<; .<.<;. t . <:'<: <.t
c • C C •
< ot c
"
- <T c c c «C£
C <. < - • c «
_ C c,
,. C <
CC <• <•'<'
•
:CO 0*TV«
O«C
<C f <_-c-C • «-<
< <. ' • i
- «. <: -C <«t
< •
«^:<'^'
< <r <• ^«
^ c <r " ctc
c <t<.
ric <^c cc-
- c <C cc.-c
, c<
:<•-
. . :
< c <> ^
^C
• <.• i ^
c <
<.«. <wt:
^ c --<: <:
c <r < ^- ~ ^
~
< c c c
c c <r <:
<:• <:.'«'
•c <:<£
<*£.«' •v
c«r"<"c" <r
< <L S^fevTci
_3T<^C
c «. or< -' — '
-
^ oc
c: c <
* ( ?
<<CI«^,<T <
<"
r, >- <r <, ^c <
i s s
•"-^•^^
«
' * ^— ^ cv
« < *• ,
rc<
< Vc V\ ^
< ^ c
<S,"X_<
,«
S V. ?
*~
FROM THE LIBRARY OF
PROFESSOR W. H. CLAWSON
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE
THE
ATLANTIC MONTHLY
A MAGAZINE OF
,iterature, l^cience,, Stot, ana
VOLUME XCIII
BOSTON AND NEW YORK
HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY
€l)e lUitjcr^itie
1904
COPTKIOHT, 1903 AND 1904,
BY HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY.
AP
2>
A*
The Riverside, Press, Cambridge, Mass., U. S. A.
Electrotyped and Printed by H. O. Houghton & Company.
CONTEXTS.
INDEX BY TITLES.
Abuses of Public Advertising, Charles Mul-
ford Robinson 289
Advertising, The Psychology of, Walter
D.Scott 29
Age Limit, The, E. S. Johnson .... 542
America in Literature, H. W. Boynton . 417
American Primer, An, Walt Whitman . 460
Aristocracy of the Dollar, The, Thomas
Wentworth Higginson 506
Bachelor's Fancy, Alice Brown .... 37
Bachelors of Braggy, The, Seumas Mac-
Manus 597
Basket of "Chips, A, Henry Oldys ... 219
Baxter's Procrustes, Charles W. Chesnutt . 823
Beggar's Pouch, The, Agnes Repplier . . 385
Biographical, M. A. De W. Howe . . . 567
Blue Color of the Sky, The,, T. J. J. See 85
Books New and Old.
Stops of Various Quills, H. W. Boyn-
ton 119
Old Wine in New Bottles, Ferris Greens-
let 265
Hans Holbein and Some Other Masters,
Royal Cortissoz 402
Byways of Literature, H. W. Boyn-
ton 560
Some Biographical Studies, H. W. Boyn-
ton 707
A Few Spring Novels, H. W. Preston . 852
Books Unread, Thomas Wentivorth Higgin-
son 344
Butterflies in Poetry, Thomas Wentworth
Higginson 746
By Catalogue, Beatrice Hanscom . . . 241
Christian Science, John W. Churchman . 433
Cicero in Maine, Martha Baker Dunn . . 253
Common Lot, The, Robert Herrick, 14, 202, 352,
479, 633, 754
Contemporary Men of Letters Series, The,
Bliss Perry 274
Cynicism, Arthur Stanwood Pier . . . 260
Death of Thoreau's Guide, The, Fannie
Hardy Eckstorm 736
Decent Thing, The, Frederick Orin Bartlett 379
Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi
Valley, The, Frederick J. Turner . 676, 807
Dream of Akinosuke, The, Lafcadio Hearn 340
England, A Letter from : The Issue of
Protection, R. Brimley Johnson . . . 141
English and American Cousins, Thomas
Wentworth Higginson 184
Ethics of Taxation, The, Winthrop More
Daniels 772
Father Hennepin, Bliss Perry 419
Fishing with a Worm, Bliss Perry . . . 699
Fra Paolo Sarpi, Andrew D. White . 45, 225
France, The Year in, Alvan F. Sanborn . 652
Frenchwoman's Son, The, <S. Carleton . . 449
George Borrow, H. W. Boynton .... 244
Germany, A Letter from, W. C. Dreher . 389
Great Delusion of our Time, The, John H.
Denison 721
Home Life in the Seventeenth Century,
S. M. Francis 566
Hour with our Prejudices, An, Samuel
McChord Crothers 663
Humors of Advertising, The, R. L. Hartt 602
Indianapolis : a City of Homes, Meredith
Nicholson 836
" Intensely Human," Thomas Wentworth
Higginson 588
Is Commercialism in Disgrace ? John Gra- •
ham Brooks 194
Judge, The, Harriet A. Nash 692
Laura Bridgman, William James ... 95
Law of the Soul, The, I. B. Finley . . . 623
Letters of John Ruskin, Charles Eliot
Norton 577, 797
Lincoln, Recollections of, Henry Villard . 165
Literary Aspect of Journalism, The, H.
W. Boynton 845
Lugging Boat on Sowadnehunk, Fannie
Hardy Eckstorm 501
Lynching : A Southern View, C. H. Poe . 155
Mississippi Valley, The Diplomatic Con-
test for the, Frederick J. Turner . 676, 807
Moorish Empire in Europe, The, A. L. P.
Dennis 862
Moral Overstrain, George W. Alger . . . 4%
Morley's Gladstone, Rollo Ogden . . . . 63
Mr. Mabie's Latest Book, Bliss Perry . . 418
Mr. Huneker's Musical Essays, Lewis M.
Isaacs 859
Music, A History of American, Howard M.
Ticknor . . 860
IV
Contents.
New American Type, The, H. D. Sedgwick 535
New England, Two Books about, H. W.
Boynton 126
New Hunting, The, Kate Milner Babb . 99
Notes on the Scarlet Letter, Theodore T.
Munger 521
Novel Experiment in Poetry, A, H. \V.
Boynton 275
Odd Sort of Popular Book, An, Gamaliel
Bradford, Jr 548
On Catering for the Public, Bliss Perry . 1
Part of a Man's Life, Thomas Wentworth
Higginson.
The Sunny Side of the Transcendental
Period 6
English and American Cousins .... 184
Books Unread 344
The Aristocracy of the Dollar .... 506
" Intensely Human " 588
Butterflies in Poetry 74ti
Platonic Poetry, Ferris Greenslet .... 124
Poet Gray as a Naturalist, The, Ferris
Greenslet 420
Prescott the Man, Eollo Ogden .... 320
Psychology of Advertising, The, Walter
D. Scott 29
Quiet Man, The, Arthur S. Pier .... 830
Race Factors in Labor Unions, William
Z. Eipley 299
Return of the Gentlewoman, The, Harriet
Lewis Bradley 400
Rhode Island, The Meaning of, G. P. W. 127
Roman Cabman, A, T. E. Sullivan ... 308
Roxella's Prisoner, Harriet A, Nash . . 72
Ruskin, Letters of John, Charles Eliot
Norton . 577, 797
Scab, The, Jack London 54
Shadow, The, Charles Miner Thompson . 175
Sicilian Highlands, The, William Sharp . 471
Singapore, Elizabeth W. H. Wright ... 105
Small Business as a School of Manhood,
The, Henry A. Stimson 337
Some Books about Cities, //. W. Boynton 276
Some Nineteenth-Century Americans, M.
, A. DeWolfe Howe 79
Tsome Recent Aspects of Darwinism, E. T.
Brewster 513
Song-Forms of the Thrush, Theodore Clarice
Smith 777
Stage Coach, The, Elia W. Peattie ... 787
Street Railway Legislation in Illinois, Ed-
win Burritt Smith 109
\
Tenement House Problem, The, Burton J.
Hendrick 414
Theodor Mommsen, Jesse Benedict Car-
ter 373
Three Dramatic Studies, H. W. Boynton . 712
Three English Writers, H. W. Boynton . 569
Timotheos and the Persians, J. Irving
Manatt 234
Training in Taste. W. H. Downes ... 817
Transcendental Period, The Sunny Side of
the, Thomas Wentworth Higginson ... 6
Trolley Competition with the Railroads,
Bay Morris 730
" True Poets, " Ferris Greenslet .... 421
Wall Street and the Country, Charles A.
Conant 145
Warwick Castle and its Earls, S. M.
Francis 714
When I Practised Medicine, Leighton
Parks 555
Work of the Woman's Club, The, Martha
E. D. White . . 614
INDEX BY AUTHORS.
Alger, George W., Moral Overstrain . . 496
Bartlett, Frederick Orin, The Decent
Thing 379
Boynton, H. W.
Two Books about New England . . . 120
George Borrow 244
A Novel Experiment in Poetry . . . 275
Some Books about Cities 276
America in Literature 417
Three English Writers 569
Three Dramatic Studies 712
The Literary Aspect of Journalism . . 845
Books New and Old.
Stops of Various Quills 119
Byways of Literature 560
Some Biographical Studies .... 707
Bradford, Gamaliel, Jr., An Odd Sort of
Popular Book 548
Bradley, Harriet Lewis, The Return of
the Gentlewoman 400
Brewster, E. T., Some Recent Aspects of
Darwinism 513
Brooks, John Graham. Is Commercialism
in Disgrace ? 194
Broicn, Alice, Bachelor's Fancy .... 37
Buck, Gertrude. Invocation 500
Burton, Bichard, Dead Out of Doors . . 319
Carleton, S., The Frenchwoman's Son . . 449
Carter, Jesse Benedict, Theodor Momm-
sen 373
Cawein, Madison, Whippoorwill Time . 613
Chadwick, John White, Timeo Danaos . . 233
Cheney, John Vance.
Thanks 352
Content 554
Weeds and Flowers 851
Chesnutt, Charles W.. Baxter's Procrustes 823
Churchman, John W., Christian Science . 433
Conant, Charles A., Wall Street and the
Country 145
Cortissoz, Boyal.
Books New and Old.
Hans Holbein and Some Other Mas-
ters .402
Contents.
Crothers, Samuel McChord, An Hour with
our Prejudices 663
Daniels, Winthrop More, The Ethics of
Taxation 772
Denison, John H., The Great Delusion of
our Time 721
Dennis, A. L. P., The Moorish Empire in
Europe 862
Downes, W. H., Training in Taste . . . 817
Dreher, W. C., A Letter from Ger-
many 389
Dunn, Martha Baker, Cicero in Maine . . 253
Earle, Mabel, Birch Creek Caiion ... 71
Eckstorm, Fannie Hardy.
Lugging Boat on Sowadnehunk . . . 501
The Death of Thoreau's Guide. ... 736
Finley, Isabel Bowman, The Law of the
Soul 623
Francis, S. M.
Home Life in the Seventeenth Century . 566
Warwick Castle and its Earls .... 714
Grant, Robert, Verses to Colonel Higgin-
son on his Eightieth Birthday .... 192
Greenslet, Ferris.
Platonic Poetry 124
Books New and Old.
Old Wine in New Bottles .... 265
The Poet Gray as a Naturalist ... -120
"True Poets" .421
Hanscom, Beatrice, By Catalogue . . . 241
Hartt, Rollin Lynde, The Humors of Ad-
vertising 602
Hearn, Lafcadio, The Dream of Akino-
suke" 340
Hendrick, Burton J., The Tenement House
Problem 414
Herrick, Robert, The Common Lot, 14, 202, 352,
479, 633, 754
Higginson, Thomas Wentworth.
Part of a Man's Life.
The Sunny Side of the Transcendental
Period 6
English and American Cousins . . . 184
Books Unread 344
The Aristocracy of the Dollar . . . 506
" Intensely Human " 588
Butterflies in Poetry 746
Howe, M. A. De Wolfe.
Some Nineteenth-Century Americans . 79
Strange Instrument of Many Strings . 174
Biographical 567
Isaacs, Lewis M., Mr. Huneker's Musical
Essays 859
James, William, Laura Bridgman ... 95
Johnson, E. S., The Age Limit .... 542
Johnson, R. Brimley, A Letter from Eng-
land : The Issue of Protection .... 141
Ketchum, Arthur, Candlemas 218
Lennah, M., The Richness of Poverty .
London, Jack, The Scab
MacManus, Seumas, The Bachelors of
Braggy
Manatt, J. Irving, Timotheos and the Per-
sians
Messer, Mary Burt, Life's Tavern .
Morris, Ray, Trolley Competition with
the Railroads
Munger, Theodore T., Notes on the Scarlet
Letter
Nash, Harriet A.
Roxella's Prisoner
The Judge
Nicholson, Meredith, Indianapolis : a City
of Homes
Norton, Charles Eliot, Letters of John
Ruskin 577,
Ogden, Hollo.
Morley's Gladstone
Prescott the Man
Oldys, Henry, A Basket of Chips
Palmer, Francis Sterne, Paul Lenthier's
Feeshin'-Pole
Parks, Leighton, When I Practised Medi-
cine
Peattie, Elia W., The Stage Coach . .
Perry, Bliss.
On Catering for the Public
The Contemporary Men of Letters
Series
Mr. Mabie's Latest Book
Father Hennepin
Fishing with a Worm
Pier, Arthur Stanwood.
Cynicism
The Quiet Man
Poe, Clarence H., Lynching: A Southern
View
Preston, Harriet Waters, A Few Spring
Novels
Rabb, Kate Milner, The New Hunting . .
Reese, Lizette W., The Cry of the Old
House
Repplier, Agnes, The Beggar's Pouch . .
Ripley, William Z., Race Factors in Labor
Unions
Robinson, Charles Mulford, Abuses of Pub-
lic Advertising
Sanborn, Alvan F., The Year in France .
Scollard, Clinton, The Book-Lover . . .
Scott, Walter D., The Psychology of Ad-
vertising
Sedgwick, H. D., The New American
Type.
See, T. J. J., The Blue Color of the
Sky .......
Sharp, William, The Sicilian Highlands .
Smith, Edwin Burritt, Street Railway
Legislation in Illinois
99
54
597
234
470
730
521
72
692
836
797
63
320
219
706
555
787
174
418
419
699
260
830
155
852
99
821
385
299
289
652
264
29
535
85
471
109
VI
Contents.
Smith, Theodore C., Song-Forms of the
Thrush 777
Spofford, Harriet Prescott, Dust to Dust . 674
Stimson, Henry A., The Small Business as
a School of Manhood 337
Sullivan, T. R., A Roman Cabman . . * . 308
Tabb, John B., A Wind Call 379
Thayer, William Roscoe, At the Grave of
Samuel Adams 771
Thompson, Charles Miner, The Shadow . . 175
Ticknor, Howard M., A History of Amer-
ican Music . . 860
Turner, Frederick J., The Diplomatic Con-
test for the Mississippi Valley . . 676, 807
Van Dyke, Henry.
Reliance 28
A Quatrain 806
Villard, Henry, Recollections of Lincoln . 165
White, Andrew D., Fra Paolo Sarpi . . 45, 225
White, Martha E. D., The Work of the
Woman's Club 614
Whitman, Walt, An American Primer. . 460
Wright, Elizabeth W. H., Singapore . . 105
POETRY.
At the Grave of Samuel Adams, William Quatrain, A, Henry van Dyke 806
Roscoe Thayer 771
Reliance, Henry van Dyke 28
Birch Creek Canon, Mabel Earle ... 71 Richness of Poverty, The, M. Lennah . . 99
Book-Lover, The, Clinton Scollard ... 264
Strange Instrument of Many Strings,
Candlemas, Arthur Ketchum 218 M. A. De Wolfe Howe 174
Content, John Vance Cheney 554
Cry of the Old House, The, Lizette W.
Eeese . 821
Thanks, John Vance Cheney 352
Timeo Daiiaos, John White Chadwick . . 233
Dead Out of Doors, Richard Burton .
Dust to Dust. Harriet Prescott Spofford
319
674
Verses to Colonel Higginson on his Eight-
ieth Birthday, Robert Grant .... 192
Invocation, Gertrude Suck 500 Weeds and Flowers, John Vance Cheney . 851
Whippoorwill Time, Madison Cawein . . 613
Life's Tavern, Mary Burt Messer ... 470 Wind-Call, A, John B. Tabb 379
Paul Lenthier's Feeshin'-Pole, Francis
Sterne Palmer . 706
CONTRIBUTORS' CLUB.
Clock-Ticks 574 On Traveling 138
Confessions of a Woman Lecturer . . . 868
Contemporaneousness 871
On Traveling, Again : The " Deposit " Sys-
tem .720
Disagreeable People I have Known Who
have Loved Plants ........ 866
Pilgrim Fathers, The : Their Debt to
Us 137
Plea for Patent Affection, A 719
Educated Mispronunciations 864 Punster and the Poet, The 135
Europe Unvisited 428
" Handsomely Illustrated " ...
Honorable Point of Ignorance, An .
136
132
Quotation and Allusion 575
Things Found in Books 863
Tradition and Biography 285
Idealistic Realist, An 280 Typewriter vs. Pen 425
I Take My Niece to Parsifal 717
Unhandsomely Illustrated 427
Mouth of the Mime, The 716 Unruly Kingdom, The 282
New Conditions in Reading 572 Waning Art of Making Believe, The .
New England Visionaries 430 What Children Want to Know . . .
133
286
THE
ATLANTIC MONTHLY
of literature^ ^>cience5 3rt> anD
VOL. XGIIL — JANUARY, 1904. — No. DL V.
ON CATERING FOR THE PUBLIC.
IN that brief catalogue of New Year's
resolutions which the good American is
periodically tempted to construct, the re-
solve not to talk shop deserves a place
of honor. To be silent about one's trade
is the beginning of virtue ; but it is diffi-
cult for most of us to maintain such reti-
cence for long. That an editor of a
magazine should presume to the posses-
sion of qualities beyond the compass of
his readers is not to be thought of, and
the present writer proposes, even before
the New Year has fairly begun, to break
that fragile resolution of discretion, and
to turn his yearly greetings to the Atlan-
tic's company into a discourse upon one
aspect of his own profession. May the
Toastmaster, before the real entertain-
ment for 1904 begins, chat for a moment
upon the perilous art of catering for the
public ?
The best that may be said for Tho-
reau's regimen of beans is, not that that
immortal diet was merely wholesome or
cheap, or even that it was transmuted
into delightful literature, — but that Tho-
reau liked it. He was catering for him-
self and to himself. When Byron came
of age, he provided the conventional
roast ox and ale for his tenants in honor
of his majority, and then dined alone
upon his favorite delicacy, eggs and ba-
con. He catered for his public first, and
to himself afterwards. But the only edi-
tors who permit themselves such solitary
luxury of personal indulgence are the
young men who own, write, and print the
queer little 5x7 magazines with still
queerer names. They give no hostages
to fortune except paper, printer's ink, and
time. If you would seek a better analo-
gy to the real editorial function, follow
some excellent citizen of Baltimore, or
of a foreign city where marketing bears
as yet no social stigma, as he journeys to
the public market, with basket upon his
careful arm, intent upon selecting a din-
ner for his family.
Observe him. For all his apparent
leisureliness of manner, the good gentle-
man is carrying the burden of a theory.
He has certain convictions, more or less
definite, about desirable combinations of
food and drink. Convention, which is
only common sense deposited for long
periods upon the reluctant mind of our
species, has dictated to him some rude
outline of a bill of fare. He has indi-
vidual partialities of taste, but he has
also tolerably distinct ideas of what is
possible for his purse. Terrapin and
champagne must be for high days only.
And our worthy householder has also
some fixed notions as to what is best for
his family. They will thrive better, he
knows, upon honest soups and roasts than
upon cocktails and eclairs. Thus, as he
makes his way from stall to stall, does
he select, from the countless appetizing
things displayed, the material for a fore-
ordained dinner. He buys it, precisely
as he would gather harmoniously colored
flowers for a bouquet, and tucking it into
that ample basket, takes it home in all
innocence of heart. It is his affair, after
all. If he and his family like what is
On Catering for the Public.
purchased, well and good, provided their
tastes do not become a public scandal, or
their cookery grow too menacing to their
neighbors' peace of mind. It is a sim-
ple matter, this catering for a family
table, though not quite so simple as Tho-
reau's beans or Byron's eggs and bacon.
But where is the analogy to editing a
magazine ? Is it so cunningly hidden
away in this image of the householder
that one cannot find it at all ?
" Patience a moment," — to quote the
most impatient of poets. We are get-
ting " warm," as the children say, and in
a minute more we shall discover our com-
plete and archetypal editor. He is fore-
shadowed in the market-haunting house-
holder, but he is — the being who keeps
boarders.
Is it not The boarding-house
keeper is no vulgar caterer to the public
in general. He leaves that art to the
yellow journal and the corner saloon.
But he does cater for that portion of the
public who have done him the honor to
become his guests. Individual dietary
theory may still lurk in his imagination,
but it must not be over-indulged. His
own favorite beans or eggs and bacon will
be too monotonous for his boarders. The
family responsibilities of the householder
linger in him, too ; he must not poison
his boarders, or subtly undermine their
faith in human nature. Yet he has his
weekly or monthly bills to meet, and he
can meet them only by pleasing his pa-
trons. Not what his boarders ought to
like, if they would grow truly fat and
wise and good, but what they do like,
gradually comes to affect the policy of
even the most stubborn-souled Provider.
The Toastmaster wonders if any read-
ers of the Atlantic recall the once fa-
mous pension in Paris, kept by M. Al-
phonse Doucette, " formerly professor at
Lyons?" It was known in the Anglo-
American colonies, from one end of Eu-
rope to the other, as the pension des vio-
lettes, — spoken with a smile. Yes, one
smiled at M. Doucette's amiable vagaries,
but one kept on going there, and paying a
whole franc more a day than was charged
at any pension of its class in Paris. For,
as every one hastened to explain, it was
really an admirably kept establishment,
— and then there were the violets !
Every night at dinner, in season or out
of season, there was a tiny boutonniere
of them for each gentleman, and a cor-
sage bouquet of violets was laid by each
lady's plate. And Monsieur himself,
"formerly professor at Lyons," if you
please, always sat at the head of the
table and addressed his variegated com-
pany with the most incessant and exqui-
site drollery. Only a franc more than
was charged at the commonplace pen-
sions, and all those violets thrown in !
It happened that the Toastmaster re-
turned to the Pension Doucette very late
one night, after witnessing a most dreary
seven-act tragedy at the Frangais. In
the little office off the dining-room sat
M. Doucette in his shirt-sleeves, drink-
ing sugared water, and looking more
tragic than Mounet-Sully at his worst.
Something had gone wrong. It was a
trivial matter enough, but the former
professor at Lyons opened his whole
heart. Never before or since — save
once in a Vermont woodshed on a Sun-
day morning, when my host was morosely
freezing the ice cream for dinner and im-
parting with each slow turn of the crank
some darkly pessimistic generalization
on the subject of summer boarders — has
the Toastmaster seen deeper into the
Caterer's professional soul. Oh, the sor-
rows of trying to hold the fickle taste of
English and American visitors in Paris !
" But there are the violets," I ven-
tured.
" The violets ! " M. Doucette spread
his palms.
A ghastly suspicion dawned upon me.
Was his love for violets only a pretense ?
" I loathe violets ! " he broke out. " A
bas les violettes ! The odor and the sight
of them are nauseating to me. But it
is too late. If I were to give up the
On Catering for the Public.
violets, I should lose my trademark,
my prestige, my clientele. My pension-
naires expect violets ! "
I saw the trap he had laid for himself.
And, oddly enough, my thoughts wan-
dered to the veteran editor of a famous
magazine, who was once discussing two
sonnets by the same poet. He had ac-
cepted one and rejected the other ; and
now he was praising the one he had re-
turned.
" But it was the other which you
printed ! " exclaimed his puzzled auditor.
" Oh, that was my choice for the maga-
zine, certainly ; but personally " — And
he waved his cigar stub in a parabola
that opened up infinite distances of per-
spective into the editorial consciousness.
Was it possible that he, too, loathed his
violets ?
And yet, why not ? Not to speak it
profanely, does anybody suppose that
Mr. Munsey's favorite reading is the
Munsey Storiettes ? Does " the sound
of the swashbuckler swashing on his
buckler " seem less humorous to the edi-
tors who encourage it than it does to
Mr. Howells, who has laid aside his edi-
torial armor and can smile at the weak-
nesses of his former fellow warriors ?
Do the peaceful editors of The Outlook
really thrill with those stern praises of
fighting men and fighting machines which
adorn its secularized pages ? Or does
the talented conductor of The Ladies'
Home Journal really . . . No, he can-
not. As the Toastmaster makes these
too daring interrogations, it seems to him
that he perceives a faint odor of violets,
— not the shy flower of the woodside,
but the brazen-faced, tightly laced bou-
tonniere of the pavement, — in a word,
the violet of commerce.
That single glimpse of M. Doucette
in his shirt-sleeves and in his despon-
dency ought not to obliterate the memory
of a hundred nights when, clothed in
proper evening attire, he reigned glori-
ously over his long table-full of guests,
giving and receiving pleasure. When
all is going well, catering has its inno-
cent delights and its honest satisfactions.
To invent a new dish, or to serve an
old one with recognized skill, is to share
at once the artist's joy and the bour-
geois's complacency. Yet having once
beheld the confidential shirt-sleeves, one
is thenceforward subtly aware of them,
hidden though they be for another hun-
dred nights by the dress coat. They are
there, those shirt-sleeves of the Caterer,
and his workaday responsibilities are
inescapable. In vain does Sir Leslie
Stephen, in one of those papers which
have lately charmed the Atlantic's read-
ers, blithely assert that an editor " only
vouches for the readability of the article,
not for the correctness of the opinions
expressed." It is a a tt§nnial dream.
It asks too much of human nature.
Shall the Toastmaster, except in a New
Year's confidence, dare to say, " My dear
guests, I am no mycologist. This dish
may be toadstool or mushroom for all I
know, but I assure you that the odor is
appetizing " ?
Alas, it is true that he is no mycologist ;
he prints every month a dozen articles
on topics concerning which he knows
nothing, as well as a half dozen more
whose views of politics and society and
criticism are the very opposite of his
own. He vouches for their readability,
that is all ; — and sometimes this is quite
enough to take upon his conscience. But
the public is shrewdly suspicious of this
happy impartiality of ignorance. It keeps
reminding the Toastmaster that he is Ca-
terer too ; that he has the responsibility
of buying the provisions in the open mar-
ket as well as merely arranging them
upon the table and announcing the bill
of fare.
In one sense, the public is quite right.
Some one must take the responsibility of
decision. But the public sometimes for-
gets how the Caterer must make up in
faith what he lacks in special knowledge.
He depends upon the honesty of the mar-
On Catering for the Public.
ketmen, the producers. This confidence
is rarely betrayed. M. Doucette would
have died of shame, no doubt, if he had
really served toadstools to his trusting
company. Yet it never happened. His
mushrooms were always mushrooms. It
is the contributors to a magazine like the
Atlantic who maintain, after all, the fine
traditions of the institution. For pur-
poses of convenience, it is assumed that
the editor knows what he is purchasing.
In reality, he is only exercising faith in
writers who know what they are writing
and whose views — strange as it may
seem ! — may be worth consideration
even if they do not harmonize with his
own. The monthly table of contents is
neither more nor less than such a con-
fession of faith. It cannot be made with-
out a certain hardihood. In camp, when
it is your week to cook, you can always
enjoy the luxury of finding fault with the
man who laid in the supplies : he should
have bought more bacon or a different
brand of coffee, and why did he forget
the onions ? Even the suave conductor
of the dining-car, who presents you with
a menu which requests explicit criticism
of meals and service, can shrug his shoul-
ders and explain that he did not buy that
steak himself. But here in the magazine
world there is no shuffling. Month by
month what is in the larder comes on to
the table, and if it is mouldy or tough or
raw the Toastmaster cannot blame the
Caterer, for he is both in one : Dr. Jekyll
and Mr. Hyde, the red slayer and the
slain.
Who is there that can tell, after all,
precisely how to please even the most in-
dulgent of publics ? The editors of the
Atlantic have always been drafted from
the ranks of its contributors ; mere con-
tributors, who once inclosed stamps for
the return of manuscript and waited and
wondered if it would prove " magazin-
able." How can such a one, drawn in
a moment, like Browning's conscript,
" From the safe glad rear to the dreadful van "
pretend that he has been invested with
infallibility? "I am fain to think it
vivacious," wrote Lowell of a certain
Contributor's Club which he was submit-
ting to the editor in 1890, nearly thirty
years after his own editorship closed,
" but if your judgment verify my fears,
don't scruple to return it. I can easily
make other disposition of it, or at worst
there is always the waste-basket." His
Club was accepted, in spite of Lowell's
fears, — and, as it happened, it was his
last contribution to the magazine. But
whenever an author's manuscript carries
the bunker of the editor's judgment, there
remains a far more formidable hazard
still, namely, the unknown taste of the
public.
Who really understands it ? Did not
Emerson, that most unmercenary of edi-
tors, accept for The Dial, pro honoris
causa and with a sinking heart, that ar-
ticle of Theodore Parker's on the Rever-
end John Pierpont, which nevertheless,
to Emerson's astonishment, sold out the
entire edition ? Did not Coleridge, an
equally unworldly member of the guild,
lose five hundred subscribers to the ill-
starred Watchman on the publication of
the very second number, by " a censurable
application of a text from Isaiah as its
motto" ?
Of one thing only may the editor be
sure. No matter what dish be served,
some one at the table will be positive
that it either ought not to have been
brought on at all, or that it should have
been cooked differently. If the Atlantic
has dispatched a representative to Bor-
rioboola Gha to report upon the condition
of blankets-and-top-boots in that unhap-
py country, some correspondent will turn
up, as soon as the article is printed, to
prove that he himself was the sole origi-
nator of the blankets-and-top-boots idea,
and that the Atlantic has misrepresent-
ed the blessed work now going forward
there. May he not have ample space in
the next number to reply ? Well, very
likely he ought to have it. But the un-
lucky editor, puzzling at that moment
On Catering for the Public.
over the problem of finding space in the
issue three months hence, thinks with a
sigh of M. Doucette's pension. For at
those long table-d'hote dinners no one
was expected to care for every course ;
if you allowed a dish to pass or left it
barely tasted, you must for that very rea-
son talk the more agreeably with your
neighbor ; and if individual clamor over
some unfortunate concoction reached the
quick ear of M. Doucette, with what
infinite ease and wit did he offer the
critic the honor of planning and pre-
paring the next meal in person, — an
invitation which was somehow never ac-
cepted. Besides, as M. Doucette used
sometimes to hint, when flushed with his
success, if one did not like the pension
des violettes, there were plenty of other
pensions across the way, eager for patron-
age.
Is all this too intimate a survey of the
editorial pantry and kitchen ? Pray con-
sider it nothing more than the shirt-
sleeved conversation of that garrulous
M. Doucette, provoked into real confi-
dence by an unusual hour. The New
Year's greetings come but once a twelve-
month, after all. And the Caterer's sor-
rows are very few in comparison with
the pleasure of spreading the Atlantic's
table and seeing the still increasing guests
appear. May every one find in the
courses now presented something to his
taste ! Not to like Colonel Higginson's
new essays will indeed be to betray a
fantastic appetite. If articles upon Ad-
vertising and the Ethics of Business
savor too much of the very shop which
you take up the Atlantic to forget, turn
back to the sixteenth century, and follow
Mr. Andrew D. White's account of the
singular career of Father Paul. If you
love that cheerful sound of the swash-
buckler in fiction, you must wait a little
longer, for Mr. Herrick's The Common
Lot is only about Chicago, and concerns
itself with men and women who are un-
commonly like ourselves. There will be
some contributions from writers who
long since laid down their pens : from
Emerson, whose Journals begin in a few
months ; from Timrod, and the elder
Henry James ; and from Walt Whitman,
who appeared in these pages twice or
thrice in his early manhood, and now
comes back as a lusty ghost. But many
of the contributors are young ; provok-
ingly young, indeed, to know so much
and to write so well. There will be va-
riety enough, at least, with some dishes
of the fine old substantial sort, and wine
that needs no praise, and coffee and
cigars for those who like them, or gossip
about men and women and books, if that
be more to your after-dinner fancy. And
perhaps there will be a few violets, pur-
chased with secret anxiety of heart, but
laid by each plate with such grace as
Park Street may afford.
At any rate, here is a clean cloth for
1904 and an unfeigned welcome. For-
get, if you will, the unskilled service, and
remember that market-place and kitchen
are as yet imperfect places in an imper-
fect, although improvable and improv-
ing world. And here is a boy's appe-
tite to every guest, and a Happy New
Year!
B. P.
The Sunny Side of the Transcendental Period.
PART OF A MAN'S LIFE.
" The uttered part of a man's life, let us always repeat, bears to the unuttered, unconscious
part a small unknown proportion. He himself never knows it, much less do others." — Carlyle's
Essay on Scott.
THE SUNNY SIDE OF THE TRANSCENDENTAL PERIOD.
IT happened to me once to be sum-
moned on short notice to the house of a
most agreeable neighbor, then Dean of
the Episcopal Theological School at Cam-
bridge, to assist in entertaining two Eng-
lish guests unexpectedly arrived. These
guests were a husband and wife, both
authors, and visiting this country for the
first time. They proved to belong to that
class of British travelers who, as the gen-
ial Longfellow used to say, come hither,
not so much to obtain information about
America, as to communicate it. We
were scarcely seated at table when the
little lady — for they were both very
small in person — looked up at me con-
fidingly and said, " Don't you think it
rather a pity that all the really interesting
Americans seem to be dead ? " It was
difficult for a living man to maintain any
resistance against a conclusion so deci-
sive, and all I remember is that our talk
became a series of obituaries. To those
might now be added, were it needful,
similar memorials of my fair questioner,
of her husband, and of our gracious host
himself, since these also have passed
away. And why should such remem-
brances be sad, one may well ask, if they
are brought together in a sunny spirit,
and have for their motto, not the mourn-
fulness of old-time epitaphs, but rather
the fine outburst of Whitman's brief song
of parting, " Joy, Shipmate, Joy." Even
the gloomy Carlyle had to admit that
" there is no life of a man faithfully re-
corded, but is a heroic poem of its sort,
rhymed or unrhymed."
Those who followed the chorus of af-
fectionate praise which surrounded the
celebration of Emerson's hundredth
birthday must have felt very keenly its
unlikeness to the ever renewing tumult of
discussion around the grave of Carlyle.
The difference was in great measure the
penalty of temperament, or in Emerson's
case, its reward. No one recognized
this more fully than Carlyle himself
when he said sadly to me, " Ah ! the
dear Emerson ! He thinks that every-
body in the world is as good as himself ; "
just as he had said to Longfellow, years
before, that Emerson's first visit to him
was " like the visit of an angel." It is
clear that the whole atmosphere of Emer-
son's memory is that of sunshine, but it
gradually appears, in tracing it farther,
that much of this traditional atmosphere
extends — at least for those who lived
through it and perhaps for their children
also — over the whole intellectual period
of which Emerson was the best repre-
sentative. This period is now usually
and doubtless vaguely known in America
as the period of Transcendentalism. Un-
satisfying as the word, when thus ap-
plied, must be, it may yet be employed
for want of a better, without entering too
profoundly into its source or its services.
Originally a philosophic term, it can be
used for the present to indicate a period.
The word " Transcendentalism " was
apparently first employed by the leader
among modern German philosophers,
Immanuel Kant, to designate the in-
tuitive method of reaching truth, as apart
from the experimental or sensational
method of Locke, which had held its
own so stoutly. Kant died in 1804, but
the word was handed on, so modified
and, we might perhaps say, battered by
The Sunny Side of the Transcendental Period.
later German thinkers, that it would
now be useless to attempt to employ it
further than as a landmark or guidepost,
as it will be used here. If we wish to
ax the birth-time of the American pe-
riod bearing that name, we may place it
somewhere near the publication of Emer-
son's Nature (1836), or the appearance
of the first number of The Dial (July,
1840), or the formation of the " Brook
•Farm Institute " or " Community " as it
was oftenest called, near Boston (1841).
The special interest of this household for
the world was not so much because it
gave a new roof-tree for a little domestic
experiment, — the Moravians and Shak-
ers had long before done that, — but
rather because it offered also an atmos-
phere of freedom.
It visibly relaxed restraint, suggested
a substitute for the strict Puritan tradi-
tion, brought together the most open and
hopeful minds of the community, some-
times uniting with them the fanatics,
still oftener the do-nothings ; giving con-
servatives and radicals alike something
to talk about. Those whose names are
now oftenest associated with the Brook
Farm enterprise, as Emerson, Alcott,
Margaret Fuller Ossoli, and William
Henry Channing, never actually be-
longed to it ; while its most noted mem-
bers, as Hawthorne and George William
Curtis, were there only during the first
year. The only narrator who has writ-
ten his personal remembrances of it was
but a second-year member ; and its more
systematic historian, Mr. Lindsay Swift,
says justly of it, " There was a distinct
beginning, a fairly coherent progress,
but a vague termination." He also
touches the keynote of the whole history
when he says in his preface, " It is more
than fifty years since the last dweller in
that pleasant domain turned his reluctant
steps away from its noble illusions, and
toward the stress of realities ; but from
no one of this gracious company has ever
come the admission that Brook Farm was
a failure." Surely this is much to say.
In going still farther back for the his-
toric origins of American transcendental-
ism, we must recognize the earlier influ-
ence of Burns, Coleridge, and Words-
worth, as laying the foundations for all
this new atmosphere of thought and liv-
ing. This is a fact of much interest as
compared with the first reception of all
these poets in their own country. The
London Monthly Review — the lead-
ing critical magazine in England before
the Edinburgh Review appeared — pro-
nounced Burns's first volume to be " dis-
gusting," and " written in an unknown
tongue/' the editor adding his own partial
version of The Cotter's Saturday Night
translated into the English language !
The same editor pronounced Coleridge's
Ancient Mariner " the strangest story of
a cock and bull that we ever saw on paper
... a rhapsody of unintelligible wildness
and incoherence, of which we do not per-
ceive the drift," while Christabel was
described by him as " rude, unfeatured
stuff." Even of Wordsworth's Tintern
Abbey the same critic complains that it is
" tinctured with gloomy, narrow, and un-
sociable ideas of seclusion from the com-
merce of the world ; " and yet on turning
the pages of Dennie's Portfolio published
in Philadelphia simultaneously with the
English periodical just quoted (1786), we
find these very poets and, indeed, these
identical poems hailed as the opening of
a new intellectual era. Such, indeed, it
was, but an era heralded in America with
an eagerness, cordiality, and, above all, a
cheerfulness such as might well belong to
a fresher and more youthful life.
Then followed Carlyle's great influ-
ence through his Sartor Resartus, whose
American editor, Charles Stearns Wheel-
er, I can well remember to have watched
with timid reverence at the Boston Athe-
naeum Library as he transcribed that ex-
citing work from the pages of Fraser's
Magazine, for its first reprinting in book
form. Still more must be recalled the in-
fluence of Kant and Fichte, Hegel and
Schleiermacher, with the more transient
8
The Sunny Side of the Transcendental Period.
eclectic philosophy of the Frenchmen
Cousin and Jouffroy, whose books were
translated from the French and used for
a time as text-books in Harvard College
and elsewhere, as early as 1839. The
German poets also were just being trans-
lated, though of course in a fragmentary
way, in America, especially Goethe, Schil-
ler, and even Heine ; and the poetic writ-
ings of Hoffmann, Novalis, Jean Paul
Richter, and others lent their influence,
first under the lead of Carlyle, and after-
wards through direct American transla-
tors, the Rev. Charles T. Brooks and Mrs.
Eliza Buckminster Lee. Many of these
poetic translations appeared in The Dial,
and the prose versions in the series of vol-
umes, fourteen in all, entitled Specimens
of Foreign Standard Literature, planned
and edited by George Ripley. To him
especial attention should be given, since
if the sunny atmosphere of the period
was personally incarnated in any one, it
was undoubtedly in him.
George Ripley was the single con-
summate type, during that period, of
that rarest of combinations, the natural
scholar and the cheery good fellow. Evi-
dence of the former quality might be
found in the catalogue, had it only been
. preserved, of his library sold in aid of
the organization of Brook Farm, and uni-
versally recognized as the best German
library then to be found in America;
while the best tribute to the other trait
was the universal regret said to have
been felt among his clerical brethren at
the loss of the gayest companion and best
story-teller in their ranks. He it was
who with Emerson, Hedge, and George
Putnam called together the first meet-
ing of " what was named in derision the
Transcendental Club," as Hedge writes ;
and he it was who resigned his clerical
charge in 1840, with a view to applying
to some form of action the newer and
ampler views of life.
Even Dr. Channing, then the intellec-
tual leader of Boston, had some confer-
ence with Ripley as to whether it would
be possible to bring cultivated and
thoughtful people together and make a
society that deserved the name. Mr.
Swift in his admirable book on Brook
Farm reminds us that there was a con-
sultation on this subject at the house of
Dr. John C. Warren, then the leading
physician of Boston, which ended " with
an oyster supper, crowned by excellent
wines." Undoubtedly, on that occasion,
George Ripley told his best stories and
laughed his heartiest laugh. But we may
be sure that his jubilant cheeriness was
no less when he turned his back on all
this and left the flesh-pots of Egypt for
a dinner of herbs at Brook Farm.
There is something very interesting
and not wholly accidental in the way in
which a German influence was thus eai'ly
making itself felt in this country and
contributing, as a matter of course, to
its sunshine. This clearly came from
a double influence, the appearance in
America of a number of highly educated
Germans, of whom Lieber, Follen, and
Beck were types, who were driven from
their country by political uproar about
1825 ; and, on the other hand, the return
of a small number of highly educated
Americans, at a period a little earlier,
who had studied at the German universi-
ties. The most conspicuous among these
men were Edward Everett, George Tick-
nor, George Bancroft, and Joseph Green
Cogswell, the latter being the organizer
of our first great American library, the
Astor. Their experience and influence
had a value quite inestimable, and the
process of their training is shown unmis-
takably in a remarkable series of letters
from them to my father, then steward
of Harvard College, and in some respects
their sponsor ; letters published by my-
self in the Harvard Graduates' Magazine
for September, 1897. In one of these
letters, the cool and clear-headed Ever-
ett, going from the Continent to inspect
the universities of Oxford and Cam-
bridge, expressed the opinion that Amer-
ica had at that date (1819) " nothing to
The Sunny Side of the Transcendental Period.
9
learn from England [in regard to uni-
versity methods], but everything to learn
from Germany," and I have been more
than once assured by English scholars, on
quoting to them the passage, that the re-
mark was, at the period indicated, abso-
lutely true. It is, however, also true that
Mr. Everett himself practically recog-
nized a subsequent change in conditions,
when he sent his own son, forty years
later, to an English and not to a German
university.
It must not be supposed that the
" Disciples of the Newness," as they liked
to call themselves, were allowed to go on
their way unchecked. Professor Bowen of
Harvard, always pungent and often tart,
followed them up vigorously in the North
American, as did Professor Felton more
mildly. Yet there was always something
behind the cloud, an influence which re-
vived these victims like some cloud-con-
cealed goddess in Homer, and however
severe the attacks may have been they
were usually the fruit of narrowness, not
of mere malice. They were rarely mixed
with merely personal bitterness, as were
the contests of the same period, under
Poe's influence, among New York men
of letters ; nor were they so much en-
tangled with money-quarrels as those,
since money was a thing with which New
England students had little to do. No
one among them, however, fared so mis-
erably, in financial negotiations, as did
poor Cornelius Mathews in New York,
who, after his Big Abel and the Little
Manhattan had been announced as a
forthcoming volume of a series, was of-
fered by the repentant publishers $100
to allow them to withdraw the offer and
leave the book unpublished, but who re-
fused the request. The North American
Review — then a Boston periodical —
settled the case of this unfortunate au-
thor tersely by saying, " Mr. Mathews
has shown a marvelous skill in failing,
each failure being more complete than
the last." Horace Greeley hit his mere-
ly political opponents as hard as this, but
the New York Tribune under Margaret
Fuller's influence kept clear of bitter per-
sonalities in literature, something which
she had not always quite done in The
Dial.
It must be remembered that the Tran-
scendentalists never, in the early days,
called themselves by that name. Their
most ambitious title was, as has been said,
that of Disciples of the Newness. It
must also be remembered that this New-
ness itself was in some degree a reversion
to the old, as in Margaret Fuller's case it
came from a learned father who brought
her up in direct inheritance of whatever
was ancient. She was, by her own state-
ment, early " placed in a garden with a
great pile of books before her." She be-
gan to read Latin before she read Eng-
lish. The Greek and Roman deities were
absolutely real to her, and she prayed,
" O God, if thou art Jupiter ; " or else to
Bacchus for a bunch of grapes. When
she was old enough to think about Chris-
tianity, she cried out for her dear old
Greek and Roman gods. It was a long
time, her friend Mrs. Dall tells us," before
she could see the deeper spirituality of the
Christian tradition." Hence it is, per-
haps, that we see rather less of sunshine in
her than in the other Transcendentalists.
For the unbelieving world outside, it
must be remembered, the Transcendental
movement at least contributed some such
sunshine through the very sarcasms it
excited ; as when Mrs. Russell, Father
Taylor's brilliant daughter, did not flinch
from defining the Transcendentalists as
" a race who dove into the infinite, soared
into the illimitable, and never paid cash ; "
or when Carlyle described Ripley, who
had called on him in England, as " a So-
cinian minister, who had left the pulpit to
reform the world by cultivating onions."
Emerson compared Brook Farm to " a
French Revolution in small," and a cer-
tain meeting of the Transcendental Club
to " going to heaven in a swing." All
the peculiai-ities of Brook Farm, we may
be sure, were reported without diminu-
10
The Sunny Side of the Transcendental Period.
tion in the gossip of Boston society, even
the jokes of the young people made upon
themselves being taken seriously in the
world outside; as when they asked at
the dinner-table, "Is the butter within
the sphere of your influence ? " or pro-
posed that a pie should be cut " from the
centre to the periphery." There being
more young men than young women,
at first, an unusual share of household
duties, moreover, fell upon the stronger
sex. They helped in the laundry, brought
water from the pump, prepared vege-
tables in the barn. The graceful George
William Curtis trimmed lamps, and the
manly and eminently practical Charles
Dana organized a band of " griddle-cake
servitors," composed of " four of the most
elegant youths of the community."
There was also a Brook Farm legend
that one of the younger members or pupils
confessed his passion while helping his
sweetheart to wash dishes ; and Emerson
is the authority for stating that as the men
danced in the evening, clothespins some-
times dropped from their pockets. Haw-
thorne wrote to his sister, not without sar-
casm, " The whole fraternity eat togeth-
er, and such a delectable way of life has
never been seen on earth since the days of
the early Christians. We get up at half-
past six, dine at half-past twelve, and go
to bed at nine." An element of moral
protest also entered into the actual work
of the more serious members. Thus Mr.
Ripley said to Theodore Parker of John
Dwight, afterwards eminent as a musi-
cal critic, " There is your accomplished
friend ; he would hoe corn all Sunday if
I would let him, but all Massachusetts
could not make him do it on Monday."
Rumor adds that Parker replied, " It is
good to know that he wants to hoe corn
any day in the week." The question is
not how far these details were based on
fact or were the fruit of fancy, but the
immediate point is that they materially
aided in keeping up the spirits of the un-
believing world outside.
It is possible that those seemingly
vague and dreamy times might have com-
municated to those reared in them too
passive and negative a character but for
the perpetual tonic of the anti- slavery
movement, which was constantly entan-
gling itself with all merely socialistic dis-
cussion. At every crisis brought on by
this last problem it turned out that mere
moral purpose might impart to these pa- .
cific social reformers a placid courage
which rose on occasion to daring. Thus
it took years to appreciate the most typi-
cal of these men, Bronson Alcott. The
quality that was, at first, rather exas-
perating in him became ultimately his
greatest charm : the manner in which
this idealist threw himself on the Uni-
versal Powers and left his life to be as-
signed by them. That life had seemed
at first as helpless and unpromising as
the attitude of the little Italian child who,
having stopped at a certain door near
Boston and received breakfast for sweet
charity's sake, was found sitting placidly
on the doorstep, two hours later, and be-
ing asked why she had not gone away
replied serenely, " What for go away ?
Plenty time go away ! " The wide uni-
verse was to Alcott a similai-ly vast and
tranquil scene. He had, as was said of
his English friend Greaves, " a copious
peacefulness." It was easy enough to
see this in a humorous light, but when in
later years, after those who had broken
down the Boston Court House door for
the rescue of Anthony Burns had been
driven out, and the open doorway was left
bare, it was Alcott who walked unarmed
up the empty steps, calmly asking, " Why
are we not within ? " and on finding him-
self unsupported turned back slowly, then
walked placidly down again, he and his
familiar cane, without visible disturbance
of mind. It has lately come to light, since
the publication of the memoirs of Daniel
Ricketson, that Alcott afterwards offered
to be one of a party for the rescue of Cap-
tain John Brown. It was still the same
Alcott, only that he watched the slowly
forming lines of his horoscope, and found
Sunny Side of the Transcendental Period.
11
them in Emerson's phrase, " come full
circle." In a similar way, Thoreau, after
all his seeming theories of self-absorption,
ranged himself on the side of Brown as
placidly as if he were going for huckle-
berries.
Yet the effect of Transcendentalism on
certain characters, a minority of its adher-
ents, was seemingly disastrous; though
the older we grow, the harder it is to
be sure that we know all the keys to in-
dividual character. The freedom' that
belonged to the period, the sunny at-
mosphere of existence, doubtless made
some men indolent, like children of the
tropics. Some went abroad and lived
in Europe, and were rarely heard from ;
others dwelt at home, and achieved no-
thing ; while others, on the contrary, had
the most laborious and exacting careers.
Others led lives morally wasted, whether
by the mere letting loose of a surge of
passion ill restrained, or by that terrible
impulse of curiosity which causes more
than half the sins of each growing gen-
eration, and yet is so hard to distinguish
from the heroic search after knowledge.
I can think of men among those bred in
that period, and seemingly under its full
influence, who longed to know the worst
of life and knew it, and paid dearly for
their knowledge ; and their kindred paid
more dearly still. Others might be named
who, without ever yielding, so far as I
know or guess, to a single sensual or
worldly sin, yet developed temperaments
so absolutely wayward that it became
necessary, in the judgment of all who
knew the facts, for their wives and chil-
dren to leave them and stay apart, so that
these men died in old age without seeing
the faces of their own grandchildren.
Others vanished, and are to this day
untraced; and yet all these were but a
handful compared with that majority
which remained true to early dreams
while the world called them erratic, and
the church pronounced them unredeemed
or, in Shakespeare's phrase, " unhousel'd,
disappointed, unaneled."
It must be remembered also that, in
that period of general seething, all other
reformatory movements alternated with
efforts of the socialists and joined with
them to keep up the spirits of the Com-
munity. The anti-slavery meetings, for
instance, mingled sorrow with joy and
sometimes even with levity. Nowhere in
all the modern world could have been
seen more strikingly grouped the various
dramatis personae of a great impending
social change than on the platform of
some large hall, filled with Abolitionists.
There sat Garrison in the centre, his
very attitude showing the serene im-
movableness of his mind, and around him
usually two or three venerable Quaker
Vice Presidents, always speechless, while
in themselves constituting an inexorable
though unwearied audience. Grouped
among them were " devout women, not
a few," as the Scripture has it, and fiery
orators brought together from different
fields of action, where they had been al-
ternately starved, frozen, or mobbed, ac-
cording to the various methods adopted
by unbelieving rural scoffers. Mingled
with these were a few city delegates, the
most high-bred men and women in ap-
pearance to be found in Boston, like Wen-
dell Phillips, Edmund Quincy, and Mrs.
Chapman. Among these, strangest of
all, were the living texts for all the im-
pending eloquence of the platform : the
fugitive slaves, black or mulatto or some-
times indistinguishably white, perhaps
just landed from their concealment on
Southern packet ships, or in covert cor-
ners of freight cars. There might be
Henry Box Brown, so named from the
box in which he had been nailed up and
been borne, occasionally on his head, from
slavery to freedom ; or Harriet Tubman,
who after making her own escape from
the land of slavery had made eight or
ten covert visits thither, each time bring-
ing back by the underground railroad her
little band of fugitives ; or William and
Ellen Craft, she going from city to city
northward as a white woman, and he as
12
The Sunny Side of the Transcendental Period.
her attendant slave. These, and such
as these, passed across the stage in suc-
cessive years. And no one who early saw
Frederick Douglass just rescued from
slavery could possibly have foreseen in
him the princely and commanding aspect
with which he was to tread in later years
those same boards and prove himself, as
the veteran reporter Yerrington used to
say, the only orator on the platform, ex-
cept Wendell Phillips, whose speeches
needed absolutely no revision before
printing.
These gave the tragic, the Shakespear-
ean aspect of the anti-slavery movement,
to be relieved by another side of the
screen when Wendell Phillips and some
other hero of the platform led beyond the
door the shrieking Abby Folsom, with her
unfailing cry, " It 's the capitalists ! " or
Mellen was silenced by more subtle per-
suasions, and tempted away to continue
his interminable harangue to some single
auditor in the side scenes. Once take
Garrison himself away from the conven-
tion and no man better loved his placid
joke. He could go to prison without
flinching, but could not forego his pun,
we may be sure, after he got there, and
would no more have denied himself that
innocent relaxation in jail than a typical
French nobleman in Revolutionary days
would have laid aside his snuff-box in the
presence of the guillotine. A similar
cheerful and unwavering tone pervaded
those leaders generally, and I remem-
ber when Mrs. Chapman established the
first outdoor anti-slavery festival, on the
avowed ground that there was no reason
why the children of this world should
enjoy themselves better than the Chil-
dren of Light.
It is needless to say that the tropical
race in whose interest all this anti-slavery
work was carried on took their share of
levity, when opportunity came, the in-
stances of habitual gloom being usually
found, not among those who had escaped
from slavery, but rather in those born
free, bred at the North, having some
worldly prosperity, and yet feeling that
a modified subjugation still socially rest-
ed upon them. The inexhaustible sense
of humor in Frederick Douglass, on the
other hand, kept him clear of this, as was
never better seen than on the once famous
occasion when the notorious Isaiah Ryn-
ders of New York at the head of a mob
had interrupted an anti-slavery meeting,
captured the platform, placed himself in
the chair, and bade the meeting proceed.
Douglass was speaking and, nothing
loath, made his speech only keener and
keener for the interference, weaving
around the would-be chairman's head a
wreath of delicate sarcasm which carried
the audience with it, while the duller wits
of the burly despot could hardly follow
him. Knowing only, in a general way,
that he was being dissected, Rynders at
last exclaimed, " What you Abolitionists
want to do is to cut all our throats ! "
" Oh, no ! " replied Douglass in his most
dulcet tones. " We would only cut your
hair ; " and bending over the shaggy and
frowzy head of the Bowery tyrant he
gave a suggestive motion as of scissors, to
his thumb and forefinger, with a profes-
sional politeness that instantly brought
down the house, friend and foe, while
Rynders quitted the chair in wrath, and
the meeting dissolved itself amid general
laughter. It was a more cheerful con-
clusion, perhaps, than that stormier one
— not unknown in reformatory conven-
tions — with which Shakespeare so often
ends his scenes : " Exeunt fighting."
One of the most curious circumstances
connected with the whole Transcenden-
tal period, and one tending, whether in
seriousness or through satire, to bring
out its sunny side, was its connection
with Horace Greeley. He himself was
a strange mixture of the dreamy and the
practical, and his very appearance and
costume, his walk and conversation, com-
bined these inconsistent attributes. The
one great advertising medium possessed
by the whole Brook Farm movement was
the New York Tribune, and it is a part
The Sunny Side of the Transcendental Period.
13
of the quaintness of the whole affair at
Brook Farm that an enterprise so physi-
cally insignificant should have for its
organ a journal then rapidly on its way
to becoming the most widely circulated
in the nation. Yet Greeley's own exter-
nals, when he first stood at the door at
Brook Farm, might have suggested a
visitor from any part of the land rather
than New York city, and a delegate from
any other sphere rather than that of
metropolitan journalism. Miss Amelia
Russell, a member of Brook Farm, thus
describes his appearance at first glance :
" His hair was so light that it was almost
white ; he wore a white hat, his face was
entirely colorless, even the eyes not add-
ing much to save it from its ghostly hue.
His coat was a very light drab, almost
white, and his nether garments the same."
No better samples could, perhaps, be
given of the mirth-making aspects of
that period than might be done by a se-
ries of extracts from Greeley's letters as
published in the volume called Passages
from the Correspondence of Rufus W.
Griswold, in which you find Greeley al-
ternately moving heaven and earth to
get for the then unknown Thoreau the
publication of his maiden essay on Car-
lyle in Graham's Magazine and himself
giving $75 to pay for it in advance ; and
about the same time writing to Griswold,
" Gris. make up for me a brief collection
of the best Epigrams in the Language —
say three folio sheets of MSS. ; " then
cheerfully adding, " A page may be given
to epitaphs, if you please, though I don't
care ! "
This suggests how much of the sun-
shine at that period came also to many
from Thoreau himself, whose talk and
letters, like his books, were full of deli-
cate humor ; and who gave to outdoor
hours such an atmosphere of serene de-
light as made one feel that a wood-thrush
was always soliloquizing somewhere in
the background. Walks with him were
singularly unlike those taken with Alcott,
for instance, who only strolled serenely
to some hospitable fence at the entrance
to some wood, and sat down there, obliv-
ious whether frogs or wood-thrushes filled
the air, so long as they did not withdraw
attention from his own discourses. As
Alcott carried his indoor meditations out
of doors, so Thoreau brought his outward
observations indoors, and I remember
well the delightful mornings when his
favorite correspondent, Harry Blake, my
•neighbor in Worcester, Mass., used to
send round to a few of us to come in
and hear extracts from Thoreau's last let-
ter at the breakfast table ; these extracts
being the very materials that were af-
terwards to make up his choicest vol-
ume, Walden ; letters that combined with
breakfast and with sunrise to fill the day
for us auditors with inexhaustible de-
light.
That period is long passed, and these
few stray memories can at best give but
a few glimpses of its sunnier side. The
fact that it did pass and that it can never
be reproduced is the very thing that
makes its memories worth recalling.
The great flood -tide of the civil war
bore this all away, followed by the stu-
pendous growth of a changed nation.
Every age has its own point of interest ;
and the longest personal life, if lived
wholesomely, can offer but a succession
of these. But one question still remains,
and will perhaps always remain, unan-
swered. Considering the part originally
done by the English Lake Poets in bring-
ing about this period of sunshine in
America, why is it that the leaders of
English literature on its native soil for
the last half century have had a mourn-
ful and clouded tone ? From Carlyle
and Ruskin through Froude and Arnold
to Meredith, Hardy, Stevenson, and
Henley, all have had a prevailing air of
sadness, and sometimes even of frightful
gloom. Even Tennyson, during at least
a portion of his reactionary later life,
and Browning, toward the end of his,
showed the same tendency. In Amer-
ica, on the other hand, during the same
14
The Common Lot.
general period, the leading literary fig-
ures, with the solitary exception of Poe,
— who was wont to be an exception to
all rules, — were sunshiny and hopeful,
not gloomy. This is certainly true of
Emerson, AJcott, Thoreau, Longfellow,
Lowell, Holmes, Whittier, Whitman.
Even if Hawthorne may have seemed to
the world an exception from his reti-
cence and sombre bearing, we must re-
member how he laid aside those traits
within his own household. " Never was
there such a playmate," said to me once
his noble and stately daughter Una, de-
scribing her happy childhood. These
and all the rest, save Poe, found joy,
predominant joy, in life. Why this dif-
ference ? It is not yet time, perhaps, to
fathom the mystery and give a clear an-
swer to the question.
Thomas Wentworth Higginson.
THE .COMMON LOT.1
FROM time to time the door opened to
admit some tardy person. Then the May
sunlight without flooded the dim, long
hall with a sudden radiance, even to the
arched recess in the rear, where the coffin
was placed. The late-comers sank into
the crowd of black-coated men, who filled
the hall to the broad stairs. Most of these
were plainly dressed, with thick, grizzled
beards and lined faces : they were old
hands from the Bridge Works on the
West Side, where they had worked many
years for Powers Jackson. In the par-
lors at the left of the hall there were more
women than men, and more fashionable
clothes than in the hall. But the faces
were scarcely less rugged and lined.
These friends of the old man who lay in
the coffin were mostly life -worn and
gnarled, like himself. Their luxuries had
not sufficed to hide the scars of the bat-
tles they had waged with fortune.
When the minister ceased praying, the
men and the women in the warm, flower-
scented rooms moved gratefully, trying
to get easier positions for their cramped
bodies. Some members of the church
choir, stationed at the landing on the
stairs, began to sing. Once more the
door opened silently in the stealthy
hands of the undertaker, and this time it
remained open for several seconds. A
woman entered, dressed in fashionable
widow's mourning. She moved deliber-
ately, as if she realized exactly the full
effect of her entrance at that hour among
all these heated, tired people. The men
crowded in the hall made way for her
instinctively, so that she might enter the
dining-room, to the right of the coffin,
where the family and the nearest friends
of the dead man were seated. Here, a
young man, one of Powers Jackson's
nephews, rose and surrendered his chair
to the pretty widow, whispering : —
" Take this, Mrs. Phillips ! I am afraid
there is nothing better."
She took his place by the door with a
little deprecatory smile, which said many
things at the same time : " I am very late,
I know ; but I really could n't help it !
You will understand, won't you ? "
And also : " You have come to be a
handsome young man ! When I saw you
last you were only a raw boy, just out of
college. Now we must reckon with you,
as the old man's heir, — the heir of so
much money ! "
Then again : " I have had my sorrows,
too, since we met over there across the
sea."
All this her face seemed to speak
1 Copyright, 1903, by ROBERT HERKICK.
The Common Lot.
15
swiftly, especially to the young man,
whose attention she had quite distracted,
as indeed she had disturbed every one in
the other rooms by her progress through
the hall. By the time she had settled
herself, and made a first survey of the
scene, the hymn had come to an end, and
the minister's deep voice broke forth in
the words of ancient promise, " I am the
Resurrection and the Life "...
At these words of triumph the pret-
ty widow's interruption was forgotten.
Something new stirred in the weary
faces of those standing in the hall, touch-
ing each one according to his soul, vibrat-
ing in his heart with a meaning personal
to him, to her, quite apart from any feel-
ing that they might have for their old
friend, in the hope for whose immortality
it had been spoken. . . .
" I am the Resurrection and the Life "
..." yet in my flesh shall I see God ". . .
The words fell fatefully into the close
rooms. The young man who had given
his chair to Mrs. Phillips unconsciously
threw back his head and raised his eyes
from the floor, as though he were follow-
ing some point of light which had burst
into sight above his head. His gaze swept
over his mother's large, inexpressive coun-
tenance, his cousin Everett's sharp fea-
tures, the solemn, blank faces of the other
mourners in the room. It rested on the
face of a young woman, who was seated
on the other side of the little room, al-
most hidden by the roses and the lilies
that were banked on the table between
them. She, too, had raised her face at the
triumphant note, and was seeing some-
thing beyond the man's eyes, beyond the
walls of the room. Her lips had parted
in a little sigh of wonder ; her blue eyes
were filled with unwept tears. The man's
attention was arrested by those eyes and
trembling lips, and he forgot the feeling
that the minister's words had roused, in
sudden apprehension of the girl's beauty
and tenderness. He had discovered the
face in a moment of its finest illumina-
tion, excited by a vague yet pure emotion,
so that it became all at once more than
it had ever promised. The tears trembled
at the eyelids, then dropped unnoticed to
the face. The young man looked away
hastily, with an uncomfortable feeling at
beholding all this emotion. He could not
see why Helen Spellman should take his
uncle's death so much to heart. The old
man had always been kind to her and to
her. mother. She had been at the house
a great deal, for her mother and his uncle
were old friends, and the old man loved
to have the girl about the house. Yet he
did not feel his uncle's death that way ;
he wondered whether he ought to be af-
fected by it as Helen was. He was cer-
tainly much nearer to the dead man than
she, — his nephew, the son of his sister
Amelia, who had kept his house all the
many years of her widowhood. And, —
he was aware that people were in the
habit of saying it, — he was his favorite
nephew, the one who would inherit the
better part of the property. This last
reflection set his mind to speculating on
the impending change in his own world.
The new future, which he pleasantly
dreamed, would bring him nearer to her.
For the last few days, ever since the doc-
tors had given up all hope of the old
man's recovery, he had not been able to
keep his imagination from wandering in
the fields of this strange, delightful future
which was so near at hand. . . .
" There is a natural body," so the min-
ister was saying solemnly, " and there is
a spiritual body. . . . For this corruptible
must put on incorruption, and this mor-
tal must put on immortality."
The young man tried to curb his im-
agination, to feel the significance of the
fact before him in some other way than as
it might affect his own material fate. . . .
When the clergyman began his re-
marks about the dead man's personality,
he roused the tired people and brought
them back to their common earth. What
could he say ? The subject was full of
thorns. Powers Jackson had not been a
bad man, take his life all in all, but he
16
The Common Lot.
had been accused, justly, of some ruth-
less, selfish acts. His morality had never
quite satisfied the ideals of his neighbors,
and he could not be called, in any sense
of the word known to the officiating min-
ister, a religious man.
Yet there was scarcely a person present
to whom Powers Jackson had not done
some kind and generous act. Each one
in his heart knew the dead man to have
been good and human, and forgave him
his sins, public and private. What did
it matter to old Jim Ryan, the office por-
ter, who was standing in the corner with
his son and grandson, whether Powers
Jackson had or had not conspired with
certain other men to capture illegally a
great grant of Texas land ! He and his
family had lived in the sun of the dead
man's kindness.
While the minister was saying what
every one agreed to in his heart, — that
their dead friend was a man of large
stature, big in heart as in deed, strong for
good, as for evil, — his nephew's thoughts
kept returning to that glowing, personal
matter, — what did it all mean to him ?
Of course, his uncle had been good to him,
had given him the best kind of an edu-
cation and training in his profession ; but
now he was about to give him the largest
gift of all, — freedom for his whole life-
time, freedom to do with himself what he
pleased, freedom first of all to leave this
dull, dirty city, to flee 'to those other parts
of the earth which he knew so well how
to enjoy ! . . . The pretty widow beside
him fidgeted. She was exceedingly un-
comfortable in the close, stuffy room, and
the minister's skillful words only roused
a wicked sense of irony in her. She
could have told the reverend doctor a
thing or two about old Powers ! She
threw back her jacket, revealing an at-
tractive neck and bust. She had scanned
the faces of most of those in the rooms,
and, with great rapidity, had cast up
mentally their score with the dead. This
handsome young nephew was the only
one that counted in her own estimation.
What was he going to do with the old
fellow's money? She threw a specula-
tive, admiring look at him. . . .
Across the room the girl's face had
settled into sober thought, the tears dry-
ing on her cheeks where they had fallen.
In that glorious promise of Life Ever-
lasting, which was still reverberating in
her soul, she felt that the only real Life
which poor human beings might know
was that life of the " spiritual body," the
life of the good, which is all one and alike !
To her, Powers Jackson was simply a
good man, the best of men. For she had
known him all her life, and had seen no-
thing but good in him. She loved him,
and she knew that he could not be dead !
Finally, the minister rounded out his
thought and came to the end of his re-
marks. The singers on the stairs began
to chant softly, " Now, O Lord, let
thy servant depart in peace ! " And the
tired faces relaxed from their tense se-
riousness. Somehow, the crisis of their
emotion had been reached and passed.
Comforted and reassured, the men and
women were leaving this house of mourn-
ing. An old man, childless, a widower
of many years, who had done his work
successfully in this world, and reaped the
rewards of it, — what can one feel for
his death but a solemn sense of mystery
and peace ! Perhaps to one only, the
girl hidden behind the lilies and the roses
in the dining-room, was it a matter of
keen, personal grief. He had left her
world, who had stroked her head and
kissed her, who had loved her as a father
might love her, who had always smiled
when she had touched him.
On the sidewalk outside the people
gathered in little knots, speaking in sub-
dued tones to one another, luxuriating in
the riotous spring air. Then they moved
away. After the house was pretty well
emptied, those mourners who had been
in the dining-room appeared, to take car-
riages for the cemetery. Mrs. Phillips
came first, talking to young Jackson Hart.
She was saying : —
The Common Lot.
17
" It was all quite what the dear old gen-
tleman would have liked and such good
taste, — that was your part, I know ! "
As he handed her into her carriage,
she leaned toward him, with a very per-
sonal air : —
" It is so different from the last time
we met ! Do you remember ? You must
come and see me, now that I am hack in
this place for good."
As the young man turned away from
her, he met Helen Spellman descending
the long flight of steps. She was carry-
ing in her arms a great mass of loose
flowers, and his cousin Everett was simi-
larly burdened.
" Are you going on ahead of us ? "
Jackson asked anxiously.
" Yes. I want to put these flowers
there first ; so that it won't seem so bare
and lonely when he comes. See ! I have
taken those he liked to have in his library,
and yours and your mother's, too ! "
She smiled, but her eyes were still
dull with tears. Again she brought his
thoughts back from self, from his futile,
worldly preoccupations, back to her love
for the dead man, which seemed so much
greater, so much purer than his.
" That will be very nice," he said, tak-
ing the flowers from her hands and plac-
ing them in a carriage that had driven
up to the curb. " I am sure he would
have liked your thought for him. He
was always so fond of what you did, of
you."
" Dear uncle," she murmured to her-
self. Although the dead man was not
connected with her by any ties of blood,
she had grown into the habit of calling
him uncle, first as a joke, then in affec-
tion.
" He always had me get the flowers
when he wanted to give a really truly
dinner ! " she added, a smile coming to
her face. " I know he will like to have
me take these out to him there now."
She spoke of the dead in the present
tense, with a strong feeling for the still
living part of the one gone.
VOL. XGIII. — NO. 555. 2
" I should like to drive out there with
you ! " the young man exclaimed impul-
sively. " May I ? "
" Oh no ! You must n't," she replied
quickly. " There 's your mother, who
is expecting you to be with her, and
then," — she blushed and stepped away
from him a little space, — "I had rather
be alone, please ! "
When the heavy gates of the vault in
Rose Hill had closed upon Powers Jack-
son forever, the little group of intimate
friends, who had come with him to his
grave, descended silently the granite
steps to their carriages. Insensibly a
wave of relief stole over the spirit of the
young nephew, as he turned his back
upon the ugly tomb, in the American-
Greek style, with heavy capitals and false
pillars. It was not a selfish or heartless
desire to get away from the dead man,
to forget him now that he no longer
counted in this world ; it was merely the
reaction from a day of gloom and sober
thought. He felt stifled in his tall silk
hat, long frock coat, patent-leather shoes,
and black gloves. His spirit shrank
from the chill of the tomb, to which the
day had brought him near.
" Let 's send all the women back to-
gether, Everett," he suggested to his cou-
sin, " and have a smoke. I am pretty
nearly dead ! "
As the three men in the party got into
their carriage, Jackson took out his
cigarette-case and offered it to his cousin;
but Everett shook his head rather con-
temptuously and drew a cigar from his
breast pocket.
" I never got in the habit of smok-
ing those things," he remarked slowly.
There was an implication in his cool tone
that no grown man indulged himself in
that boyish habit.
" He never liked cigarettes either, —
would n't have one in the house," Jackson
commented lightly.
The other man, Hollister, had taken
a cigar, and the three men smoked in
18
The Common Lot.
silence while the carriage bumped at a
rapid pace over the uneven streets of
Chicago. Hollister, so Hart reflected,
must know what was in the will. He had
been the old man's confidential business
man for a good many years, and was one
of the executors. Everett Wheeler, who
was a lawyer with a large and very high-
ly paid practice, was another.
Perhaps this cousin was to get the bulk
of the property after all, though their
uncle had never displayed any great fond-
ness for Everett. The lawyer had al-
ways done the best that was expected of
him. He had entered a law office from
the high school, preferring to skip the
intermediate years of college training,
which Powers Jackson had offered him,
and he never ceased referring to his suc-
cess in his profession as partly due to the
fact he had " fooled no time away at col-
lege." So far as his business went, which
was to patch together crazy corporations,
he had no particular use for a liberal edu-
cation. He had no tastes whatsoever out-
side of this business and a certain mild
interest in politics. His dull white fea-
tures, sharpened to a vulpine point, and
his large nose betrayed his temperament.
He was a silent, cool-blooded, unpassion-
ate American man of affairs, and it would
be safe to say that he would die rich.
Thus far he had not had enough emotion
to get married. No ! his cousin reflected,
Everett was not a man after old Powers
Jackson's heart ! Their uncle was not a
cold, passionless man. . . .
Those two men opposite him knew what
was the fact in this matter so momentous
to him. They smoked, wrapped in their
own thoughts.
" I wonder who was the joker who
put up that monstrous Greek temple out
there in the cemetery ! " Jackson finally
observed, in a nervous desire to say
something.
" You mean the family mausoleum ? "
Everett asked severely, removing his
cigar from his lips, and spitting carefully
out of the half-opened window. " That
was done by a fellow named Roly, and it
was considered a very fine piece of work.
It was built the time aunt Frankie died."
" It 's a spooky sort of place to put a
man into ! "
" I think the funeral was what your
uncle would have liked," Hollister re-
marked. " He hated to be eccentric,
and yet he despised pretentious cere-
monies. Everything was simple and
dignified. The parson was good, too, in
what he said. And the old men turned
out in great numbers. I was glad of
that ! But I was surprised. It 's nearly
two years since he gave up the Works,
and memories are short between master
and man."
" That 's a fact. But he knew every
man-jack about the place in the old
days," Everett observed, removing his
silk hat as if it were an ornamental in-
cumbrance.
"Yes," said Hollister, taking up the
theme. " I remember how he would
come into the front office on pay days,
and stand behind the grating while the
men were signing off. He could call
every one by a first name. It was Pete
and Dave and Jerry and Steve, — there
were n't so many of those Hungarians and
Slavs, the European garbage, then."
"But he was stiff with 'em in the
strike, though," the lawyer put in, a
smile wrinkling his thin, pallid lips.
" He fired every one who went with the
union, — never 'd let 'em back, no matter
what they did. Those there to-day were
mostly old ones."
The two older men began to exchange
stories about the dead man, of things they
had seen while they were working for
him, — his tricks of temper, whims of
mind. The older man spoke gently, al-
most tenderly, of the one he had worked
with, as of one whose faults were flaws
in a great stone. The lawyer spoke
literally, impassively, as of some phenom-
enon of nature which he had seen often
and had thoroughly observed.
Young Hart lit another cigarette, and
The Common Lot.
19
he thought of the girl's face as he had
seen it that day, utterly moved and trans-
fixed with a strange emotion of tender
sorrow that was half happiness. She was
religious, he believed, meaning by that
word that she was moved by certain feel-
ings other than those which affected him
or Everett or Hollister, even. And this
new thought of her made her more pre-
cious in his eyes. He looked for her
when they reached the sombre old house
on Ohio Street, but she had already driven
home.
As Hollister was leaving, he said to
the young man : —
" Can you come over to Everett's office
to-morrow about four ? Judge Phillips
will be there, the other executor. We are
to open the will. They have suggested
that I ask you to join us," he added has-
tily, with an effort to be matter-of-fact.
" All right, Hollister," the young man
answered, with an equal effort to appear
unconcerned. " I '11 be over ! "
But his heart thumped strangely.
II.
" Get all ready before you start," Pow-
ers Jackson had said, when his nephew,
after four years at Cornell and three
years at a famous technical school in the
East, had suggested the propriety of fin-
ishing his training in architecture by
study in Paris. " Get all ready, — then
let us have results."
He had been getting ready. He had
chosen to go to Cornell rather than to a
larger university, because some of the
boys of his high school class were going
there. With us in America such mat-
ters are often settled in this childish way.
The reason why he chose the profession
of architecture was, in the first place,
scarcely less frivolous. A " fraternity
brother " at Cornell, just home from
Paris, fired the college boy's imagination
for " the Quarter." But, once started
in the course of architecture at the tech-
nical school, he found that he had stum-
bled into something which really inter-
ested him. For the first time in his life
he worked.
At the Beaux Arts he worked, also,
though he did not forget the amenities of
life. The two years, first talked of, ex-
panded into two and a half, then round-
ed to three. Meanwhile the generous
cheques from the office of the Bridge
Works came with pleasant regularity.
His mother wrote, " Powers hopes that
you are deriving benefit from your stud-
ies in Paris." What the old man had
said was, " How 's Jackie doing these
days, Amelia ? " And young Hart was
" doing " well. There were many bene-
fits, not always orthodox, which the young
American, established cosily on the Rue
de rUniversite", derived from Paris.
The day of preparation came to an
end, however. Those last weeks of his
stay in Europe he was joined by his
mother and Helen Spellman. Powers
Jackson had taken this occasion to send
them both abroad. Mrs. Spellman being
too much of an invalid to take the jour-
ney, Mrs. Amelia Hart had been very
glad to have the girl's companionship.
Jackson met them in Naples. After he
had kissed his mother and taken her
handbag, to which she was clinging in
miserable suspicion of the entire foreign
world, he turned to the girl, whose pres-
ence he had been conscious of all the
time. Helen was not noticeably pretty
or well dressed ; but she had an air of
race, a fineness of feature, a certain per-
sonal delicacy, to which the young man
had long been unaccustomed. Perhaps
three years of student life in Paris had
prepared him to think very well of a
young American woman.
So their six weeks in Italy had been
very happy ones for all three, — six
golden weeks of May and early June.
The beautiful land smiled at them from
every field and wall. Each fresh land-
scape in the panorama of their little
journeys was another joy, a new excite-
20
The Common Lot.
ment that burned in a flush of heightened
color on the girl's face. One of their
last days they spent at the little village
of Ravello, on a hilltop above Amalfi, and
there in the clear twilight of a warm
June day, with gold-tipped clouds brood-
ing over the Bay of Salerno, they came
for the first time upon the personal note.
They were leaning over the railing of
the terrace in the Palumbo, listening to
the bells in the churches of Vetri beneath
them.
" Would n't this be good for always ? "
he murmured.
He was touched with sentimental self-
pity at the thought of leaving all this, —
the beauty, the wonder, the joy of Eu-
rope ! In another short month instead of
this there would be Chicago, whose harsh
picture three years had not softened.
" I don't know," the girl replied, with
a long sigh for remembered joy. " One
could not be as happy as this for months
and years."
" I 'd like to try ! " he said lightly.
" No ! Not you," she retorted with
sudden warmth. " What could a man
do here ? "
" There are a lot of fellows in Europe
who manage to answer that question
somehow. Most of the men I knew in
Paris don't expect to go back yet, and
not to Chicago anyway."
Her lips compressed quickly. Evi-
dently they were not the kind of men
she thought well of.
" Why ! " she stammered, words
crowding tempestuously to her tongue.
" How could you stay, and not work out
your own life, not make your way in the
world like uncle Powers ? How it would
trouble him to hear you say that ! "
He was a trifle ashamed of his desire
to keep out of the fight any longer'
Hers, he judged, was a militant, am-
bitious nature, and he was quick to feel
what she expected of him.
After they had sat there a long time
without speaking, she said gently, as if
she wished to be just to him : —
" It might be different, if one were
an artist ; but even then I should think
a man would want to carry back what
he had received here to the place he was
born in, — should n't you ? "
" Well, perhaps," he admitted, " if it
were n't just — Chicago ! "
And these simple words of the girl
spoken in the garden of Ravello were a
tonic for other moments of regret.
They made the long voyage homewards
through the Mediterranean, touching at
Gibraltar for a last, faint glimpse of ro-
mance. It was a placid journey in a slow
steamer, with a small company of dull,
middle - aged Americans, and the two
were left much to themselves. In the iso-
lation of the sunny, windless sea, their
acquaintance took on imperceptibly a per-
sonal character. After the fashion of the
egotistic male, he told her, bit by bit, all
that he knew about himself, — his college
days, his friends, and his work at the
Beaux Arts. From the past, — his past,
— they slid to the future that lay before
him on the other shore of the Atlantic.
He sketched for her in colored words the
ideals of his majestic art. Tucked up on
deck those long, cloudless nights, they
touched the higher themes, — what a man
could do, as Richardson and Atwood had
shown the glorious way, toward express-
ing the character and spirit of his race
in brick and stone and steel !
Such thoughts as these touched the
girl's imagination, just as the sweet frag-
ments of a civilization finer than ours
had stirred her heart in Italy. All these
ideas she took to be the architect's
original possessions, not being familiar
with the froth of Paris studios, the wis-
dom of long dejeuners. And she was
eager over his plans for the future. For
something earnest and large was the first
craving of her soul, something that had
in it service and beauty in life. . . .
At the time of the great exposition in
Chicago she had had these matters
brought to her attention. Powers Jack-
son, as one of the directors of the enter-
The Common Lot.
21
prise, had entertained many of the artists
and distinguished men who came to the
city, and at his dinner-table she had
heard men talk whose vital ideals were
being worked into the beautiful buildings
beside the lake. Their words she had
hoarded in her schoolgirl's memory, and
now in her sympathy for the young
architect she began to see what could be
done with an awakened feeling for art,
for social life, to make our strong young
cities memorable. This, she dreamed
shyly, would be the work of the man be-
side her !
He was handsome and strong, vigor-
ously built, though inclined to heaviness
of body. His brown hair waved under
his straw hat, and a thick mustache
turned stiffly upwards in the style of the
German Emperor, which was then just
coming into fashion. This method of
wearing the mustache, and also a habit
of dressing rather too well, troubled the
girl ; for she knew that uncle Powers
would at once note such trivial aspects of
his nephew. The keen old man might
say nothing, but he would think con-
temptuous thoughts. The young archi-
tect's complexion was ruddy, healthily
bronzed ; his features were regular and
large, as a man's should be. Altogether
he was a handsome, alert, modern Amer-
ican. Too handsome ! She thought ap-
prehensively of the rough-looking, rude
old man at home, his face tanned and
beaten, knobby and hard like the gnarled
stump of an oak !
She was very anxious that the archi-
tect should make a good impression on
his uncle, not simply for his own sake,
but for the lonely old man's comfort.
She felt that she knew Powers Jackson
better than his nephew did ; knew what
he liked and what he despised. She
wanted him to love this nephew. Sev-
eral times she talked to Jackson about
his uncle. The young man listened with
an amused smile, as if he had already a
good formula for the old man.
" Mother can't get him out of that
Mansard brick menagerie on Ohio Street,
where he has lived since the fire. All
his friends have moved away from the
neighborhood. But he thinks the black-
walnut rooms, the stamped leather on the
walls, and the rest of it, is the best going
yet. That buffet, as he calls it ! It 's
early Victorian, a regular chef-d'oeuvre
of ugliness. That house ! "
" It 's always been his home," she pro-
tested, finding something trivial in put-
ting this comic emphasis on sideboards
and bookcases. " He cares about good
things too. Lately he 's taken to buying
engravings. Mr. Hollister interested him
in them. And I think he would like to
buy pictures, if he was n't afraid of being
cheated, of making a fool of himself."
" You '11 make him out a patron of
the fine arts."
Jackson laughed long at the picture
of his uncle as a connoisseur in art.
" Perhaps he will be yet ! " she re-
torted stoutly. " At any rate, he is a
very dear old man."
He would not have described his uncle
Powers in the same simple words. Still
he had the kindest feelings toward him,
mixed with a latent anxiety over what
the old man would do about his allow-
ance, now that his schooldays had come
definitely to a close. . . .
Thus in the long hours of that voyage,
with the sound of the gurgling, dripping
water all about them, soothed with the
rhythm of pounding engines, the man
and the woman came to a sort of know-
ledge of each other. There was created
in the heart of each a vision of the other.
The girl's vision was glorified by the
warmth of her imagination, which trans-
formed all her simple experiences. In
her heart, if she had looked there, she
would have seen an image of youth and
power, very handsome, with great mas-
culine hopes, and aspirations after un-
wrought deeds. Unconsciously she had
given to that image something which she
could never take back all the years of her
life, let her marry whom she might !
22
The Common Lot.
And he could remember her, if here-
after he should come to love her, as she
was these last days. The shadow of the
end of the romance was upon her, and it
left her subdued. To the artist in the
architect her head was too large, the brow
not smooth enough, the hair two shades
too dark, the full face too broad. The
blue eyes and the trembling, small mouth
gave a certain childishness to her ex-
pression that the young man could not
understand. It was only when she spoke
that he was much moved ; for her voice
was very sweet, uncertain in its accents,
tremulous. She seemed to breathe into
commonplace words some revelation of
herself. . . .
In the morning of their arrival the lofty
buildings of the great city loomed through
the mist. The architect said : —
" There are the hills of the New World !
Here endeth the first chapter."
" I cannot believe it has ended," she
replied slowly. " Nothing ends ! "
Powers Jackson and Mrs. Spellman
met the travelers in New York. It was
just at the time that Jackson was nego-
tiating with the promoters of a large
trust for the sale of his Bridge Works.
This fact his nephew did not learn for
some months, for the old man made it a
rule to tell nothing about his deeds and
intentions. At any rate, he did sell the
Works one morning in the lobby of his
hotel and for his own price, which was
an outrageous one as the stockholders
of the new trust came to know to their
chagrin.
He shook hands with his sister, kissed
Helen on the forehead, and nodded to
his nephew.
" How 's the Pope, Amelia ? " he
asked gravely.
" You need n't ask me ! Did you
think, Powers, I 'd be one to go over to
the Vatican and kiss that old man's
hand ? I hope I 'm too good a Chris-
tian to do that ! "
" Oh, don't be too hard on the feller,"
Jackson said, continuing his joke. " I
hoped you 'd pay your respects to the
Pope. Why, he 's the smartest one of
the whole bunch over there, I guess."
He looked to Helen for sympathy. It
should be said that Powers Jackson re-
garded his sister Amelia as a fool, but
that he never allowed himself to take ad-
vantage of the fact except in such trifling
ways as this.
When the two men were alone in the
private parlor at the hotel, the uncle
said : —
" So you 've finished up now? You 're
all through over there ? "
" Yes, sir," Hart answered, not feel-
ing at all at his ease with this calm old
man. " I guess I am ready to begin
building, as soon as any one will have
me!"
" I see there 's plenty doing in your
line, all over."
The architect fidgeted before he could
think what to say. Then he expressed
his sense of gratitude for the great op-
portunities his uncle had given him in
Paris. Jackson listened but said nothing.
The architect was conscious that the old
man had taken in with one sweep of his
sharp little eyes his complete appearance.
He suspected that the part in the middle
of his brown hair, the pert lift to the ends
of his mustache, the soft stock about his
neck, the lavender colored silk shirt in
which he had prepared to meet the piti-
less glare of the June sun in the city, —
that all these items had been noted and
disapproved. He reflected somewhat re-
sentfully that he was not obliged to make
a guy of himself to please his uncle. He
found his uncle's clothes very bad. Pow-
ers Jackson was a large man, and his
clothes, though made by one of the best
tailors in Chicago, had a draggled ap-
pearance, as if he had forgotten to take
them off when he went to bed. However,
when the old man next spoke, he made
no reference to his nephew's attire.
" I was talking to Wright about you
the other day. Ever heard of him? "
The Common Lot.
23
" Of Walker, Post & Wright? " Hart
asked, naming one of the best known
firms of architects in the country.
" Yes. They 've been doing something
for me in Chicago. If you have n't made
any plans, you might start in their office.
That '11 teach you the ropes over here."
Nothing was said about an allowance
or a continuation of those generous and
gratefully acknowledged cheques which
had made life at Cornell and at Paris so
joyous.
And nothing more was ever said about
them ! Jackson Hart had taken the posi-
tion that Wright had made for him in
his Chicago office, and within a fortnight
of the day he landed at New York he
was making his daily pilgrimage to the
twelfth floor of the Maramanoc Building,
where under the bulkheads worked a
company of young gentlemen in their
shirt-sleeves.
That was two years ago, and by this
time he was ready for almost any kind of
change.
III.
The morning after the funeral Francis
Jackson Hart was working on the eleva-
tion of a large hotel that Walker, Post
& Wright were to build in Denver. This
was in all probability the last piece of
work that he should be called upon to do
for that firm, and the thought was plea-
sant to him. He had not spent an al-
together happy two years in that office.
It was a large firm, with other offices in
St. Paul and New York, and work under
construction in a dozen different states.
Wright was the only member of the firm
who ever thought of coming to Chicago ;
he dropped into the office nearly every
month, coming from somewhere north or
east and bound for somewhere south or
west, with only a few days to spare. He
was a tall, thin man, with harassed, near-
sighted eyes, — a gentleman, and well
trained in his profession according to the
standards of a generation ago. But he
had fallen upon a commercial age, and
had not been large enough to sway it.
He made decent compromises between his
taste and that of his clients, and prided
himself on the honesty of construction in
his buildings.
Wright had hurt Hart's susceptibilities
almost at the start, when he remarked
about a sketch that the young architect
had made for a new telephone exchange :
" All you want, my boy, is the figure of
a good fat woman flopping around above
the third story to make the Prix de
Rome"
For the next few months Hart had
been kept busy drawing spandrels. From
this he was promoted to designing stables
for rich clients. He resented the im-
plied criticism of his judgment, and he
put Wright down as a mere Philistine,
who had got his training in an American
office.
Now, he said to himself, as he took
down his street coat and adjusted his
cuffs before going over to his cousin's
office to hear the will, he should leave
Wright's " department store," and show
" the old man " what he thought of the
kind of building the firm was putting up
for rich and common people. He, at least,
would not be obliged to be mercenary.
His two years' experience in Chicago had
taught him something about the fierce-
ness of the struggle to exist in one of the
professions, especially in a profession
where there is an element of fine art.
And his appetite to succeed, to be some
one in the hurly-burly of Chicago, had
grown very fast. For he had found him-
self less of a person in his native city
than he had thought it possible over in
Paris, — even with the help of his rich
uncle, with whom he had continued to
live.
So, as the elevator of the Dearborn
Building bore him upwards that after-
noon, his heart beat exultantly : he was
to hear in a few moments what advan-
tage he had been given over all the toil-
ing, sweating fraternity here in the ele-
24
The Common Lot.
vator, out there on the street ! By the
right of fortunate birth he was to be
spared the common lot of man, to be
placed high up on the long, long ladder
of human fate. . . .
When he entered Everett Wheeler's
private office, Hollister was talking with
Judge Phillips. The latter nodded plea-
santly to the young man, and gave him
his hand.
"How do you do, sir?" he asked,
with great emphasis.
The judge, who had not sat in a court
for more than a generation, was a vigor-
ous, elderly man, with a sweeping gray
mustache. He was an old resident of
Chicago, and had made much money,
most of it in Powers Jackson's enter-
prises.
Hollister nodded briskly to the archi-
tect, and motioned him to a seat. Pre-
sently Everett came in from the safe
where he had gone to get some papers,
and Hollister, who seemed to be spokes-
man for the executors, clearing his throat,
began : —
" Well, gentlemen, we all know what
we are here for, I presume."
The young architect never remem-
bered clearly how it all came about. At
first he wondered why old Hollister
should open the proceedings with such
elaborate eulogies of the dead man. Hol-
lister kept saying that few men had un-
derstood the real man in Powers Jack-
son, the warm, man's heart that beat
beneath the rude and silent manner.
" I want to say," Hollister exclaimed
in a burst of unwonted emotion, " that
it was more than mutual interest which
allied the judge and me to Mr. Jackson.
It was admiration ! Admiration for the
man ! "
The judge punctuated this opinion
with a grave nod.
" Especially these latter years, when
your uncle was searching for a way in
which he might most benefit the world
with the fortune that he had earned by
his ability and hard work."
The gray-bearded man ceased talking
for a moment and looked at the two
younger men. Everett was paring his
nails, very neatly, with the air of atten-
tion he wore when he was engaged in tak-
ing a deposition. The architect looked
blankly mystified.
" He wanted to help men," Hollister
resumed less demonstratively. " Espe-
cially workingmen, the kind he had known
all his life. He never forgot that he
worked at the forge the first five years
he lived in Chicago. And no matter
what the labor unions say, or the cheap
newspaper writers, there was n't a man
in this city who cared for the best inter-
ests of laboring men more than Powers
Jackson."
Across the judge's handsome face flit-
ted the glimmer of a smile, as if other
memories, slightly contradictory, would
intrude themselves on this eulogy. Ever-
ett, having finished cutting his nails, was
examining his shoes. He might be think-
ing of the price of steel billets in Liver-
pool, or he might be thinking that Hol-
lister was an ass, — no one could tell.
" He took advice ; he consulted many
men, among them the president of a
great Eastern university. And here in
this document " — Hollister took up the
will — " he embodied the results, — his
purposes."
In the architect's confused memory of
the fateful scene there was at this point
a red spot of consciousness. The man
of affairs, looking straight at him, seem-
ingly, announced : —
" Powers Jackson left the bulk of his
large fortune in trust with the purpose
of founding a great school for the chil-
dren of workingmen ! "
There ensued a brief pause. Hart did
not comprehend at once the full signifi-
cance of what had been said. But the
others made no remark, and so Hollister
asked the lawyer to read the will, clause
by clause.
It was a very brief document. There
was an item, Jackson recalled afterward,
The Common Lot.
25
leaving the old family farm at Vernon
Falls in Vermont to "my dear young
friend, Helen Powers Spellman, because
she will love it for my sake as well as
for itself." And to this bequest was
added a few thousand dollars as a main-
tenance fund.
He might have treated her more gen-
erously, it occurred to the architect vague-
ly, valuing in his own mind the old place
as naught.
"And to my nephews, Everett Wheeler
and Francis Jackson Hart, ten thousand
dollars each in the following securities."
This he understood immediately. So,
that was his figure ! He scarcely noted
the next clause, which gave to his mother
the Ohio Street house and a liberal income
for her life. He did not fully recover
himself until Hollister remarked with a
little upward inflection of satisfaction :
" Now we come to the core of the ap-
ple ! "
Slowly, deliberately, Everett read
on: —
" Being desirous that the larger part
of whatever wealth I may die possessed
of may be made of immediate and wide
benefit to mankind, I do give and be-
queath the residue of my estate to Judge
Harrison Phillips, Everett Wheeler, and
Mark Kingsford Hollister, in trust, for
the following described purposes. . . .
Said fund and its accumulations to be
devoted to the founding and maintenance
of a school or institution for the purpose
of providing an education, industrial and
technical, for the children of working-
men, of the city of Chicago."
" That," exclaimed Hollister trium-
phantly, " is to be Powers Jackson's gift
to mankind ! "
There were a few more sentences to
the will, elaborating slightly the donor's
design and providing for a partition of
the estate into building and endowment
funds. Yet, as a whole, the document
was singularly simple, almost bare in its
disposition of a very large amount of
money. It reposed a great trust in the
men selected to carry out the design, in
their will and intelligence. Doubtless
the old man had taken Hollister, at least,
into his confidence, and had contented
himself with leaving verbal and general
directions, knowing full well the fate
of elaborately conceived bequests. The
wise old man seemed to have contented
himself with outlining broadly and plain-
ly his large intention.
" That 's a pretty bad piece of work,
that instrument," Everett observed, nar-
rowing his eyes to a thin slit. " He
didn't get me to draw it up. I can't
see how the old man could trust his stuff
to such a loosely worded document."
" Fortunately," Hollister hastened to
say, " in this case we may hope that will
make no difference."
There was an awkward pause, and
then the lawyer replied drawlingly : —
" No, I don't suppose there '11 be any
trouble. I don't see why there should
be."
Jackson felt dimly that here was his
chance to protest, to object to Everett's
calm acceptance of the will. But a cer-
tain shame, or diffidence, restrained him
at the moment from showing these men
that he felt injured by his uncle's will.
He said nothing, and Hollister began to
talk of the projected school. It was to
be something new, not exactly like any
other attempt in education in our coun-
try, and it would take time to perfect the
details of the plan. There was no need
for haste.
" We must build for generations when
we do start," Hollister said. " And the
other trustees agree with me that this
is not the most opportune time for con- *
verting the estate into ready money."
" It will pretty nearly double the next
five years," the judge observed authori-
tatively.
" At the present, as closely as we can
estimate it, there is available for the pur-
poses of the trust a little over three mil-
lions of dollars."
Over three millions ! Jackson Hart
26
The Common Lot.
started in his chair. He had had no
idea that his uncle was worth anything
like that amount. And these shrewd
men thought it would probably double
during the next five years ! Well, so
far as he was concerned it might be three
cents. Possibly Everett would get a few
dollars out of it as trustee. He had al-
ready shared in some of the old man's
plums, Hart reflected bitterly. While
the trustees were discussing some detail
among themselves, the young architect
made an excuse of a business engage-
ment and slipped away. Just as he
reached the door, Everett called out : —
" We '11 send the will over for probate
to-morrow. If there 's no hitch, the lega-
cies will be paid at once. I '11 be over
to see your mother very soon and ar-
range for the payment of her annuity."
Jackson nodded. He did not like to
try his voice. He knew that it was very
dry. Somehow he found himself in the
elevator herded in a cage of office boys
and clerks, sweating and dirty from a
long day's work. At the street level he
bought a newspaper, and the first thing
that caught his eye in its damp folds
were the headlines : —
JACKSON'S MILLIONS GO TO EDUCA-
TION
THE STEEL MAGNATE'S MONEY WILL
FOUND INDUSTRIAL SCHOOL
Hart crumpled up the sheet and threw
it into the gutter. The first intelligible
feeling that he had over his situation was
a sort of shame that his uncle should
have held him so cheap. For so he in-
terpreted the gift of ten thousand dol-
lars ! And he began to try in his mind
the case between himself and his uncle.
He had always been led to believe that
he was the most favored of all the old
man's dependents. Surely he had been
treated like a son, and he was not con-
scious that he had ever been ungrateful
or unworthy. Now, without having com-
mitted any public folly, he was made a
thing of pity and contempt before his
friends !
He resented the old man's kindness,
now that he knew where it led. Very
swiftly he began to realize what it would
mean to be without fortune. He had in-
tended to move to New York, where some
of his friends had started prosperously,
and had invited him to join them. And
there was Helen, whom he had come to
love ! Marriage was now out of the
question. For Helen no more than he
had been favored by his uncle. Even
Helen, whom he had pretended to love,
had been left with only a stony farm. . . .
Thus he ploughed his way down the
murky street in the direction of the North
Side -Bridge. The gloom of a foggy
spring evening was added to the smoke
and grime of the careless city. The ar-
chitect felt dirty and uncomfortable, and
he knew now that he was condemned to
struggle on in this unlovely metropolis,
where even the baked meats of life were
flung at one ungarnished.
When the architect entered the house,
his uncle's old home, his mother was
sitting by the library table reading, just
as she had sat and read for the past
twenty years. Powers Jackson had seen
to it that she could continue this habit as
long as she might live. She called to
her son : —
" You 're late, son. Supper 's on the
table."
" Don't wait for me. I must -wash
up," he answered dully.
When he joined his mother at the
supper-table, his mustache was brushed
upwards in a confident wave, and his
face, though serious, was not blackened
by soot and care.
" Did you see Everett ? " Mrs. Hart
asked suggestively.
Jackson told her in a few words the
chief provisions of the will as he remem-
bered them. For some moments she
said nothing. Then she remarked, with
a note of annoyance in her voice : —
The Common Lot.
27
" Powers was always bound I sh'd
never leave this house except to follow
him to Rose Hill. He 's fixed it so now
I can't! I could never make him see
how sooty it was here. We have to wash
the curtains and things once a fortnight,
and then they ain't fit to be seen."
Her son, who thought that he had his
own grievances against his uncle, made
no reply to this complaint. Before they
had finished their meal, Mrs. Hart
added : —
" He might have done more for you,
too, seeing what a sight of money he left."
" Yes, he might have done it, but you
see he did n't choose to. And I guess
the best thing we can do is to say as
little as possible about the money. That
is, unless we decide to fight the will."
He threw this out tentatively. It had
not occurred to him to contest the will
until he began to wash for supper. Then
he had thought suddenly : —
" Why should I stand it ? "
But Mrs. Hart, who had never opposed
her brother in all her life, exclaimed : —
" You would n't do that, Jackson ! I
am sure Powers would n't like it."
" Perhaps not," the young man replied
ironically. " It is n't his money, now,
though."
It occurred to him soon, however, that
by this act he would endanger his mo-
ther's comfortable inheritance, besides es-
tranging his cousin Everett and all the old
man's friends. To contest the will would
be a risk. It was a matter upon which
he should have to take advice at once.
When he spoke again at the end of their
supper, he said judicially : —
" I am glad you are comfortably
looked out for, though I hope I should al-
ways be able to give you a home anyway.
And we must remember that uncle gave
me my education and my three years in
Paris, and I suppose that after that he
thought ten thousand dollars was all that
I was worth, — or could take care of ! "
He said this, standing in front of the
heavy black-walnut bookcases, which he
abhorred, while he lit a cigarette, one of
those vices despised by the old man. He
felt that he was taking his injury in a
manly way, although he still reserved to
himself the right to seek relief from the
courts. And in the deeper reaches of his
being there was a bitter sense of resent-
ment, a desire to make the world pay
him in some manner for his disappoint-
ment. If he had to, he would show
people that he could make his own way ;
that he was more than the weakling his
uncle had contemptuously overlooked -in
the disposal of his property. He should
rise in his profession, make money, and
show the world how he could swim with-
out Powers Jackson's millions.
" What kind of a school are they go-
ing to start with all that money ? " Mrs.
Hart asked, as she seated herself for the
evening.
" Oh, something technical. For sons
of mechanics, a kind of mechanics' in-
stitute."
He thought of some of the old man's
caustic remarks about charities.
" Wanted to make good before he
quit, I suppose," he mused.
" Will you stay on with that firm ? "
Mrs. Hart asked, taking up Lanciani's
Pagan and Christian Rome.
" I suppose I '11 have to," her son an-
swered after a time. . . .
Thus these two accepted the dead
man's will. Powers Jackson had come
to his decision after long deliberation,
judging that toward all who might have
claims of any kind upon him he had acted
justly and generously. He had studied
these people about him for a long time.
With Everett he had acquitted himself
years before, when he had put it in the
young man's way to make money in his
profession, to kill his prey for himself.
Jackson, he deemed, would get most out
of the fight of life by making the strug-
gle, as he had made it himself, unaided.
As for Helen, he had given the girl what
was most intimately his, and what would
do her the least harm by attracting to her
28 Reliance,
the attention of the unscrupulous world, doubt. Whether or not he had chosen
There remained what might be called his the best way to settle this account with
general account with the world, and at the world, by trying to help those unfa-
the end he had sought to settle this, the vored by birth, cannot be easily answered,
largest of all. Conceiving it to be his inalienable right
Powers Jackson had not been a good to do with his money what he would,
man, as has been hinted, but that he after death as in life, he had tried to do
took his responsibilities to heart and a large thing with it. Thus far, he had
struggled to meet them there can be no succeeded in embittering his nephew.
Robert Herrick.
(To be continued.)
KELIANCE.
NOT to the swift, the race:
Not to the strong, the fight:
Not to the righteous, perfect grace:
Not to the wise, the light.
But often faltering feet
Come surest to the goal ;
And they who walk in darkness meet
The sunrise of the soul.
A thousand times by night
The Syrian hosts have died ;
A thousand times the vanquished right
Hath risen, glorified.
The truth the wise men sought
Was spoken by a child;
The alabaster box was brought
In trembling hands defiled.
Not from my torch, the gleam,
But from the stars above :
Not from my heart, life's crystal stream,
But from the depths of Love.
Henry van Dyke.
The Psychology of Advertising.
29
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF ADVERTISING.
[This article, the first of a series of studies of Modern Advertising, has been written by Walter
D. Scott, Assistant Professor of Psychology in Northwestern University. — THE EDITORS.]
THE only method of advertising known
to the ancients was the word of mouth.
The merchant who had wares to offer
brought them to the gate of a city and
there cried aloud, making the worth of
his goods known to those who were en-
tering the city, and who might be induced
to turn aside and purchase them. We
are not more amused by the simplicity
of the ancients than we are amazed at
the magnitude of the modern systems of
advertising. From the day when Boaz
took his stand by the gate to advertise
Naomi's parcel of land by crying, u Ho,
. . . turn aside," to the day when Bar-
num billed the towns for his three-ringed
circus, the evolution in advertising had
been gradual, but it had been as great as
that from the anthropoid ape to P. T.
Barnum himself.
As soon as printed symbols were in-
vented the advertising man made use of
them to give publicity to his merchan-
dise. We find advertisements engraved
on walls and tombs, written on parch-
ment and papyrus, and printed by the
first printing presses. Although these
various forms of advertising were em-
ployed, but little thought and care seem
to have been expended upon them. Post-
ers, painted signs, street -car placards,
booklets, calendars, almanacs, handbills,
magazine and newspaper advertising
have now become forms of advertising
so well established that we look upon
them as a necessity, and are surprised to
learn that most of them are modern in-
novations.
The first advertisement printed in
English appeared in the Imperial In-
telligencer in March, 1648. Advertis-
ing in magazines was not begun until
comparatively recent times. For in-
stance, the first advertisement appeared
in Harper's Magazine in 1864. In this
magazine more space has been devoted
to advertising during the past year than
the sum total of space for the twenty-
four years from 1864 to 1887, inclusive.
Indeed, advertising may be said to have
been in its swaddling clothes until about
the year 1887. The most rapid devel-
opment has taken place during the last
fifteen years. The change has been so
great that the leading advertisers say
that in comparison with to-day there was
in existence fifteen years ago no adver-
tising worthy of the name.
The gain in the quantity of advertis-
ing can be seen by observing the increase
in the number of pages devoted to ad-
vertisements in any of our publications.
The month of October is regarded as the
typical month, therefore we present the
number of pages devoted to advertise-
ments for the month of October in Har-
per's Magazine for each year from the
first appearance of advertisements in that
magazine to the present time, • — 1864,
3£ ; '65, 2 ; '66, 3 ; '67, 6 ; '68, 7£ ;
'69, 5£ ; '70, 4* ; '71, 3 J ; '72, 2 ; '73, i ;
'74, 6 ; '75, 0~; '76, 0 ; '77, 0 ; '78, 0 ;
'79, 0 ; '80, 0 ; '81, 0 ; '82, 1£ ; '83, 8J ;
'84, 8 ; '85, 1H ; '86, 20 ; '87, 37 ; '88,
54 ; '89, 48 ; '90, 73 ; '91, 80£ ; '92, 87 ,•
'93, 77^ ; '94, 75| ; '95, 78£ ; '96, 73 ;
'97, 80f ; '98, 81f ; '99, 106f ; 1900,
97i ; '01, 93^; '02, 128; '03, 141.
It will be noticed in the data as given
above that during the years of special
prosperity there was a very great in-
crease in the volume of advertising while
there was but a slight falling off follow-
ing a financial depression. The increase
was not pronounced until about 1887,
but from that time on it has been very
marked, not only in Harper's, but in al-
most all of our publications.
30
The Psychology of Advertising.
There has not only been an increase
in the number of advertising pages in
the individual publications, but the num-
ber of publications has increased enor-
mously of recent years. The increase of
population in the United States has been
rapid during the last fifty years, but the
increase in the total number of copies of
the different publications has been many
fold greater. Thus the distribution of
the copies of these periodicals to each
individual was as follows : —
In 1850 each individual received on
the average 18 copies from one or more
of these periodicals ; in 1860, 29 ; in
1870, 39 ; in 1880, 41 ; in 1890, 74 ;
in 1900, 107.
A significant cause of this increase is
the reduction in the subscription price
which is made possible because of the
profit accruing to such publications from
their advertisements. The total income
secured from subscriptions for all these
publications last year was less than the
amount paid for the advertising pages.
We have this current year about 20,000
periodicals carrying advertisements, each
with a constantly increasing number of
pages devoted to them, and with a rapidly
advancing rate secured for each adver-
tisement. In addition to this, the in-
crease is phenomenal in the use of book-
lets, posters, painted signs, street-car
placards, almanacs, and many other
forms of advertising. One firm is sup-
posed to have distributed 25,000,000
almanacs in a single year.
The expense connected with these
various forms of printed advertising
reaches far into the millions. One au-
thority puts the total annual expense of
printed forms of advertising at six hun-
dred million dollars. This sum does not
seem to be an exaggeration. Mr. Post
spends as much as six hundred thousand
dollars annually in advertising his food
products. One million dollars was spent
last year in advertising Force. Over
six hundred thousand dollars is spent
annually in advertising Ayer's remedies ;
and over one million dollars in adver-
tising Peruna.
The advertising rate has been ad-
vanced repeatedly in many magazines
during the last few years. Firms which
formerly paid but one hundred dollars
for a full-page advertisement in the Cen-
tury Magazine now pay two hundred
and fifty dollars for the same amount of
space. The Ladies' Home Journal has
increased its advertising rate to six dol-
lars for a single agate line (there are
fourteen agate lines to the inch), the
width of one column, for a single inser-
tion. The cost of a full page for a single
issue is four thousand dollars. The Proc-
ter & Gamble Co. have made a three
years' contract for a single page in each
issue, to be devoted to the advertisement
of Ivory Soap. For this space they pay
four thousand dollars a month, forty-eight
thousand dollars a year, and one hundred
and forty-four thousand dollars for the
term of three years. Think of the risk
a firm runs in investing four thousand
dollars in a single page advertisement !
How can they expect to get back the
equivalent of such a sum of money from
a single advertisement ?
There are very many advertisements
that do not pay. One man has roughly
estimated tha.t seventy-five per cent of
all advertisements do not pay ; yet the
other twenty-five per cent pay so well
that there is scarcely a business man
who is willing to stand idly by and allow
his competitors to do the advertising.
The expense connected with advertising
has increased ; the competition between
rival firms has become keener ; and con-
sequently the demand for good advertis-
ing has become imperative. The number
of unsuccessful advertisements are many,
and yet the loss incurred in an unsuccess-
ful advertising campaign is so great that
many firms stand aghast at the thought of
such an undertaking. Many merchants
see the necessity of advertising their busi-
ness, but feel unable to enter the arena
and compete with successful rivals.
The Psychology of Advertising.
31
The day of reckless, sporadic, haphaz-
ard advertising is rapidly coming to an
end so far as magazine advertising is
concerned. Although the number of
pages devoted to advertising in our best
magazines has increased during the last
ten years, the number of firms adver-
tising in these same magazines has de-
creased. The struggle has been too
fierce for any but the strongest. The
inefficient advertisers are gradually being
eliminated, and the survival of the fittest
seems to be a law of advertising as it is
of everything else that develops.
The leaders of the profession feel that
their work has grown till it is beyond
their control and comprehension. They
have been successful, and hardly know
how it has all come about. The men
who have been the most successful are
often the ones who feel most deeply their
inability to meet new emergencies. They
believe that there should be some under-
lying principles which could help them in
analyzing what they have already accom-
plished, and assist them in their further
efforts. As their entire object is to pro-
duce certain effects on the minds of pos-
sible customers, it is not strange that
they have turned to psychology in search
of such principles. Traditionally the
practical business man scouts at theo-
ry. Psychology, to the popular mind, is
something devoid of all practical appli-
cation, related to metaphysics, and suited
only to the recluse and the hermit. If
ever there was ground to expect sarcastic
and pessimistic prophecies from the hard-
headed business man, it was when it was
proposed to establish advertising on a the-
oretical basis deduced from psychology.
Such adverse criticism has, however, been
the exception. The American business
man is not afraid of theories. He wants
them, and the more the better.
The best thought of the advertising
world finds expression in the advertising
journals and in the addresses delivered
by various experts at gatherings of pro-
fessional advertisers. In 1895 in one
of the leading advertising journals ap-
peared the following editorial : " Prob-
ably when we are a little more en-
lightened, the advertisement writer, like
the teacher, will study psychology. For,
however diverse their occupations may
at first sight appear, the advertisement
writer and the teacher have one great
object in common — to influence the hu-
man mind. The teacher has a scientific
foundation for his work in that direction,
but the advertisement writer is really
also a psychologist. Human nature is a
great factor in advertising success ; and
he who writes advertisements without
reference to it is apt to find that he has
reckoned without his host." The man who
penned this editorial was a practical
advertiser, but he admitted of no incon-
gruity between the practical and the
theoretical.
In Publicity, for March, 1901, ap-
peared a leading article on psychology
and advertising. The following is a quo-
tation from it : —
" The time is not far away when the
advertising writer will find out the in-
estimable benefits of a knowledge of psy-
chology. The preparation of copy has
usually followed the instincts rather than
the analytical functions. An advertise-
ment has been written to describe the
articles which it was wished to place
before the reader ; a bit of cleverness,
an attractive cut, or some other catchy
device has been used, with the hope that
the hit or miss ratio could be made as
favorable as possible. But the future
must needs be full of better methods
than these to make advertising advance
with the same rapidity as it has during
the latter part of the last century. And
this will come through a closer know-
ledge of the psychological composition
of the mind. The so-called ' students of
human nature ' will then be called suc-
cessful psychologists, and the successful
advertisers will be likewise termed psy-
chological advertisers. The mere men-
tion of psychological terms, habit, self,
32
The Psychology of Advertising.
conception, discrimination, association,
memory, imagination and perception,
reason, emotion, instinct and will, should
create a flood of new thought that should
appeal to every advanced consumer of
advertising space."
In an address before the Agate Club
of Chicago the speaker said : "As adver-
tisers, all your efforts have been to pro-
duce certain effects on the minds of pos-
sible customers. Psychology is, broadly
speaking, the science of the mind. Art
is the doing and science is the under-
standing how to do, or the explanation
of what has been done. If we are able
to find and to express the psychological
laws upon which the art of advertising
is based, we shall have made a distinct
advance, for we shall have added the
science to the art of advertising."
In a recent address before the Atlas
Club of Chicago the speaker said : "In
passing to the psychological aspect of
our subject, advertising might properly
be defined as the art of determining the
will of possible customers. . . . Our acts
are the resultants of our motives, and it
is your function in commercial life to
create the motives that will effect the
sale of the producer's wares."
In response to this felt need on the
part of the advertiser, several students
of psychology have tried to select those
principles of psychology which might be
of benefit to the advertiser, and to present
them to the advertising world through
pamphlets,1 magazine articles,2 public ad-
dresses,8 and, in one case at least, by
means of a book.4
The method employed by the psycho-
logist in attempting to give advertising a
theoretical basis has been quite uniform.
He has first analyzed the human mind
into its various activities, then analyzed
i
1 On the Psychology of Advertising. Pro-
fessor HARLOW GALE, author and publisher :
Minneapolis, Minn. 1900.
2 Mahin's Magazine, Chicago. This maga-
zine contains monthly articles on The Psycho-
logy of Advertising.
advertisements to discover what there is
in them that may or may not awaken the
activity desired. This method can best
be understood from an example. For
an illustration we shall consider Mental
Imagery as understood by the psycholo-
gist and in its application to advertising.
The man who is born blind is not only
unable to see objects, but he is equally
unable to imagine how they look. After
we have looked at objects we can see them
in our mind's eye with more or less dis-
tinctness, even if our eyes are closed or
the object is far removed from us. When
we imagine how an absent object looks
we are said to have a visual image of it.
We cannot imagine how a thing looks
unless we have actually seen it in our
previous experience. The imagination
can take the data of former experience
and unite them into new forms, but all
the details of the new formation must be
taken from the former experience of the
individual.
The man who is born deaf can neither
hear nor imagine what sounds are like.
Whatever we have heard, we can live
over again in imagination, — we can form
auditory images of it. We cannot im-
agine any sound which we have not ac-
tually heard, although we can unite into
new combinations the sounds and tones
which we have experienced.
I can imagine how beefsteak tastes,
but I cannot imagine the taste of hashish,
for in all my past experience I never
have tasted it, and do not even know
which one of my former experiences it
is like. If I knew that it tasted like
pepper, or like pepper and vinegar mixed,
I could form some sort of an image of
its taste ; but as it is I am perfectly help-
less when I try to imagine it. I can,
with more or less success, imagine how
8 Found in the published proceedings of the
various advertising clubs.
4 The Theory of Advertising. By WALTER
DILL SCOTT. Boston : Small, Maynard & Co.
1903.
The Psychology of Advertising.
33
everything tastes which I have eaten, but
I cannot imagine the taste of a thing
which I have not touched to my tongue.
Analogous descriptions could be given of
images of movements, of smell, of touch,
of heat, of cold, of pressure, and of pain.
We have no direct knowledge of the
minds of our neighbors ; we assume that
their thinking is very much like ours, for
their actions — outward expressions of
thought — are so similar to ours. It was
formerly assumed that, given any partic-
ular object of thought, all normal minds
would reach the same conclusion con-
cerning it, and, furthermore, the differ-
ent stages in the line of thought and
the " mind stuff " would be the same
throughout. Such a conception is wholly
false. Normal minds reach different
conclusions under apparently identical
outward circumstances, but there is a
greater difference in the terms of thought,
or the mind stuff with which the think-
ing is done. One man thinks in terms of
sight. He is said to be " eye-minded."
His thinking is a rapid succession of pic-
tures. When he thinks of a violin he
thinks rather how it looks than how it
sounds.
Another man thinks in terms of sound.
He is " ear-minded." His thinking is a
succession of sounds. When he thinks
of his friends he hears their voices, but
cannot possibly imagine how they look.
He does not know that there are other
possible forms of thought, and so assumes
that all people think in terms of sound
as he does. If he should describe a
battle his description would be full of
the roar and tumult of the strife. An-
other man is " motor-minded." He
thinks in terms of movements. Even
when he looks at a painting he whispers
inaudibly to himself a description of the
painting. Later when he describes the
picture to a friend he may do it in the
terms which he whispered to himself
when he was looking at the picture.
Thus it has been found that there are
great personal differences in normal in-
voii. xcni. — NO. 555. 3
dividuals in their ability to form certain
classes of mental images.
All persons seem to be able to form
at least unclear and indistinct visual
images ; most persons seem to have some
ability in forming auditory images ; very
many can imagine movements with some
degree of satisfaction. There are many
who cannot imagine how pickles taste ;
others cannot imagine the odor of a
flower. There are persons who have a
limited ability to form all sorts of images,
but most persons have a very decided
ability for one class and a corresponding
weakness for others. This difference in
the ease with which certain classes of
images can be formed, as well as the dif-
ference in individuals in imagining differ-
ent classes of sensations, is followed with
practical consequences.
In a former age the seller, the buyer,
and the commodity were brought to-
gether. The seller described and exhib-
ited his wares. The buyer saw the
goods, heard of them, tasted them, smelt
them, felt, and lifted them. He tested
them by means of every sense organ to
which they could appeal. In this way the
buyer became acquainted with the goods.
His perception of them was as complete
as it could be made. In these latter days
the market-place has given way to the
office. The consequent separation of buy-
er, seller, and commodity made the com-
mercial traveler with his sample case seem
a necessity. But, with the growing vol-
ume of business, and with the increased
need for more economical forms of trans-
acting business, the printed page, as a
form of advertisement, has superseded
the market-place, and is, in many cases,
displacing the commercial traveler. In
this transition from the market-place and
the commercial traveler to the printed
page, the advertiser must be on his guard
to preserve as many as possible of the
good features of the older institutions.
In the two older forms of barter all the
senses of the purchaser were appealed to,
if possible, and in addition to this the
34
The Psychology of Advertising.
word of mouth of the seller was added
to increase the impressions, and to call
special attention to the strong features
of the commodity. In the printed page
the word of mouth is the only feature
which is of necessity entirely absent. In-
deed, the printed page cannot appeal
directly to any of the senses except the
eye, but the argument may be of such a
nature that the reader's senses are ap-
pealed to indirectly through his imagina-
tion.
The function of our nervous system is
to make us aware of the sights, sounds,
feelings, tastes, etc., of the objects in our
environment, and the more sensations
we receive from an object the better we
know it. The nervous system which does
not respond to sound or to any other of
the sensible qualities is a defective ner-
vous system. Advertisements are some-
times spoken of as the nervous system of
the business world. That advertisement
of musical instruments which contains
nothing to awaken images of sound is a
defective advertisement. That advertise-
ment of foods which contains nothing to
awaken images of taste is a defective ad-
vertisement. As our nervous system is
constructed to give us all the possible
sensations from objects, so the advertise-
ment which is comparable to the nervous
system must awaken in the reader as
many different kinds of images as the
object itself can excite.
A person can be appealed to most easi-
ly and most effectively through his domi-
nating imagery. Thus one who has vis-
ual images that are very clear and dis-
tinct appreciates descriptions of scenes.
The one who has strong auditory im-
agery delights in having auditory images
awakened. It is in general best to
awaken as many different classes of im-
ages as possible, for in this way variety
is given, and each reader is appealed to in
the sort of imagery which is the most
pleasing to him, in which he thinks most
readily, and by means of which he is
most easily influenced.
One of the great weaknesses of the pre-
sent day advertising is found in the fact
that the writer of the advertisement fails
to appeal thus indirectly to the senses.
How many advertisers describe a piano
so vividly that the reader can hear it ?
How many food products are so described
that the reader can taste the food ? How
many advertisements describe a perfume
so that the reader can smell it ? How
many describe an undergarment so that
the reader can feel the pleasant contact
with his body ? Many advertisers seem
never to have thought of this, and make
no attempt at such descriptions.
The cause of this deficiency is twofold.
In the first place, it is not easy in type to
appeal to any other sense than that of
sight. Other than visual images are
difficult to awaken when the means em-
ployed is the printed page. In the sec-
ond place, the individual writers are defi-
cient in certain forms of mental imagery,
and therefore are not adepts in describing
articles in terms which to themselves are
not significant. This second ground for
failure in writing effective advertise-
ments will be made clear by the examples
taken from current advertisements which
are quoted below.
A piano is primarily not a thing to
look at or an object for profitable invest-
ment, but it is a musical instrument. It
might be beautiful and cheap, but still
be very undesirable. The chief thing
about a piano is the quality of its tone.
Many advertisers of pianos do not seem
to have the slightest appreciation of this
fact.
When they attempt to describe a
piano they seem as men groping in the
dark. Their statements are general and
meaningless. As an example of such a
failure the advertisement of the Knabe
Piano is typical : —
The KNABE
Its successful growth and experi-
ence of nearly seventy years guar-
antees to new friends the greatest
The Psychology of Advertising.
35
degree to tried and tested excel-
lencef judged from any stand-
point of criticism or comparison.
WM. KNABE & CO.
NEW YORK BALTIMORE WASHINGTON
This is a half-page advertisement, but
it contains no illustration, makes no re-
ference to tone or to any other quality of
music, and does not even suggest that the
Knabe is a musical instrument at all.
Many advertisers describe the appearance
and durability of the case or the cost of
the entire instrument, but ordinarily their
statements are so general that the adver-
tisement could be applied equally well
to perfumes, fountain pens, bicycles, au-
tomobiles, snuff, or sausages, but would
be equally inefficient if used to advertise
any of them. They do not describe or
refer in any way to the essential charac-
teristics of a piano. They awaken no
images of sound ; they do not make us
hear a piano in our imagination.
The following is a quotation in full of
an advertisement of the Vose Piano, but
with the words " sewing machine " sub-
stituted for " piano." This advertise-
ment, like the one quoted above, contains
no illustration, and it will be noted that
there is nothing in the text which does not
apply equally well to a sewing machine.
VOSE
SEWING MACHINES
Have been Established over 51 Years
They are perfect examples of sewing
machine strength. The Construction of
the Vose is the result of fifty years of
development and the application of the
highest mechanical skill to the produc-
tion of each separate part.
By our easy payment plan, every family in
moderate circumstances can own a fine sewing
machine. We allow a liberal price for old in-
struments in exchange, and deliver the sewing
machine in your house free of expense. Yon
can deal with us at a distant point the same as
in Boston. Send for our descriptive catalogue H,
which gives full information.
VOSE & SONS SEWING MACHINE CO.
161 BOYLSTON STREET, BOSTON, MASS.
Many of the advertisements of the
Emerson, Weber, Everett, and of a few
other piano firms are equally poor at-
tempts to present the desirable features
of pianos.
In recent advertisements of the Bla-
sius piano an attempt is made to present
a piano as a musical instrument. A
music score is used as the background
of the advertisement ; there is a cut of a
young lady playing the piano ; and in
the text appear these expressions : " Ex-
cellent tone," " the sweetest tone I ever
heard," " sweet and melodious in tone,"
" like a grand church organ for power
and volume : and a brilliant, sweet-toned
piano in one." Thus the background,
the illustration, and the text all unite to
awaken images of sound, and to suggest
that about a piano which is the real
ground for desiring such an instrument.
In determining which foods I shall eat
it is a matter of some importance to know
how the goods are manufactured, what
the prices are, how they are prepared for
the table, and whether they are nourish-
ing or harmful to my system. The one
essential element, however, is the taste.
When I look over a bill of fare I choose
what I think will taste good. When I
order groceries I order what pleases and
tickles my palate. I want the food that
makes me smack my lips, that makes my
mouth water. Under these circumstances
all other considerations are minimized to
the extreme*- >
In advertisements of food products it
is surprising to note that many foods are
advertised as if they had no taste at all.
One would suppose that the food was to
be taken by means of a hypodermic in-
jection, and not by the ordinary process
of taking the food into the mouth and
hence into contact with the organ of
taste. The advertisers seem to be at a
loss to know what to say about their
foods, and so have, in many cases, ex-
pressed themselves in such general terms
that their advertisements could be ap-
plied to any product whatever.
36
The Psychology of Advertising.
The following is the complete text of a
full-page advertisement which appeared
in recent magazines. The only change is
that here we have substituted " scouring
soap " for the name of the commodity :
"The grocer's smile. The smile that
wont come off.
More scouring soap the grocer said,
No other brand will do instead ;
And o'er his kindly features spread
The smile that won't come off.
Look for the coupon in the package."
The illustration was that of a grocer
looking at a package which might as well
have been scouring soap as Quaker Oats.
There is nothing to suggest taste.
Some advertisers of food are evidently
chronic dyspeptics, and take it for grant-
ed that all others are in the same condi-
tion. They have nothing to say about
their foods except that they have won-
derful medicinal properties. To me a
food which is only healthful savors of hos-
pitals and sickrooms, and is something
which a well man would not want.
There are other advertisers who appre-
ciate the epicurean tendency of the ordi-
nary man and woman. They describe
food in such a way that we immediate-
ly want what they describe. The man
who wrote the following advertisement
belongs to this class : " That very old
proverb about reaching the heart of a
man is best exemplified with Nabisco su-
gar wafers. A fairy sandwich with an
upper and a lower crust of indescribable
delicacy, separated with a creamy flavor
of lemon, orange, chocolate, vanilla,
strawberry, raspberry, or mint. Ask for
your favorite flavor." The picture repre-
sents a beautiful young lady presenting a
gentleman with the commodity described.
This advertisement has character and
individuality. Its statements , could not
be applied to anything but foods, and, in-
deed, to nothing but Nabisco. They do
not say that Nabisco is healthy, but
when I read them I feel sure that Na-
bisco would agree with me.
This illustration of the way in which
one chapter of psychology (Mental Im-
agery) can be applied to advertising is but
one of a score of illustrations which could
be given. Psychology has come to be one
of the most fascinating of all the sciences,
and bids fair to become of as great prac-
tical benefit as physics and chemistry. As
these latter form the theoretical basis for
all forms of industry which have to do
with matter, so psychology must form the
theoretical basis for all forms of endeavor
which deal with mind.
The householder in glancing through
his morning paper has his attention
caught by the more attractive advertise-
ments. The mechanic in going to and
from his place of employment whiles
away his time in looking at the display
cards in the trolley or the elevated cars.
The business man can scarcely pass a day
without being forced to look at the ad-
vertisements which stare at him from the
bill boards. The members of the family
turn over the advertising pages in their
favorite magazine, not because they are
forced to, but because they find the ad-
vertisements so interesting and instruc-
tive. These persons are oblivious to the
enormous expense which the merchant
has incurred in securing these results.
They are unconscious of the fact that the
results secured are the ones sought for,
and that in planning the advertising cam-
paign the merchant has made a study of
the minds of these same householders,
mechanics, business men, and members
of the family. Advertising is an essen-
tial factor in modern business methods,
and to advertise wisely the business man
must understand the workings of the
minds of his customers, and must know
how to influence them effectively, — he
must know how to apply psychology to
advertising.
Walter D. Scott.
Bachelor's Fancy,
37
BACHELOR'S FANCY.
CYNTHIA GALE sat by the window in
the long shed chamber, her hands at mo-
mentary ease. She was a slight, sweet
creature, with a delicate skin, and hair
etherealized by ashen coverts. Her eyes
were dark, and beauty throbbed into
them with drifting thoughts. Cynthia
was tired. She had been at work at
the loom since the first light of day, and
now she had given up to the languor of
completed effort, her head thrown back,
her arms along the arms of the chair,
in an attitude of calm. Her hair had
slipped from its coil, and fallen on
either side of her face in gentle dis-
array. She was very lovely.
The room, the scene of her toil and
resting, was dark with age and signifi-
cant in tokens of a disused art. The
loom stood well in the centre, its great
upright beams obstructing the light
from window to window. All about
were the lesser implements of a weav-
er's trade : the linen wheel, the reels
and swifts. On a chest were skeins of
indigo-blue yarn Cynthia had dyed, and
near by, the flaxen thread she had un-
earthed from an ancient hoard under
the rafters. At last, she knew how to
weave. She had walked a weary way
in the pursuit of her trade, and now she
had reached the first of many goals.
The stillness of the autumn day made
a great world about her where every-
thing was happy because everything was
busy. A woodpecker settled on the
locust outside, and began drumming.
She looked out at him from 4he idle-
ness of a well-earned rest, and smiled.
It seemed to her a wonderful earth
where there was so much to do. From
first to last, she saw, creation moved
and toiled, and she moved with it.
Without conscious thought, she felt the
strength and beauty of the twisting
chain.
Cynthia had come to happiness by a
long road. Her first memories were of
the poorhouse near the sea, where her
mother, a sad waif out of the drift of
life, had been swept, to die. Cynthia
knew nothing about her father, except
that he drank and played the violin.
People said he invented things, what
things she never heard. He was clever
with his hands and brain ; but nothing he
had was used to his own advantage. He
was one of life's pensioners. Cynthia,
growing up at the poorhouse, seemed to
have no more to do with life as it is than
he. She did the housework set her as
her portion with an absent care, and
then escaped into the open for some
mysterious sustenance that she under-
stood as little as the people who watched
her ways. There were hours when,
tramping inland, she lay prone under
the pines in the pasture, smelling at life
and very happy. There were more when
she sat looking at a great island of fern,
entranced by something she could not
apprehend, and had no need to, because
feeling was enough. Though she did
her tasks, she was called lazy, and she
lived, in a sense, apart from people un-
til one day Andrew Gale, driving about
to buy cattle, met her in the country
road as she was coming home like Ruth
from her gleaning, only that Cynthia's
arms were piled with golden-rod instead
of grain. Her eyes were brimming
with still happiness. Her cheeks had
a bloom over their summer tan. An-
drew caught his breath and stared again.
The next day, after patient watching,
he found her by the sea, and again he
met her when she went to gather grapes.
In a month he married her and took her
home to the great house where he had
lived alone since his mother's death,
with only old Hannah to do the work
in a perfect fashion that left him lone-
lier than before, in the solitude made
by her deaf ears.
38
Bachelor's Fancy.
Cynthia blossomed like a flower, and
from some inner secret of being she felt
like one. This was like growing in a
garden with fructifying soil, the sun
upon her and gentle rains, and one great
tree to shade her from too strong efful-
gence. Andrew was the tree. He was
a silent creature, the emotion in him
hidden by a fine reserve ; but he tended
and protected her until she grew wor-
shipful of him in a way neither of them
quite realized. All Cynthia's capacity
for love bloomed out in a fervor that
made her vivid, with a charm added to
her beauty. When they had been mar-
ried a few months, old Hannah died, and
then Cynthia, shrinking from a new pre-
sence in their intimate solitude, did the
work alone. She threw it off easily
enough, without heart or fancy, and very
swiftly, to give her time to be with
Andrew in the fields or during his trips
over the countryside. Housework, to
her mind, was a dull means to life, only
made tolerable because Andrew was sat-
isfied with everything she did. It was
devoid of grace, not, like weaving, a
road to happy fantasy. In spite of it,
she kept the purely untrammeled habit
of life which lies in a perfect freedom,
with love at the end of each day's work.
Again her estate seemed to her like
that of the flowers of the field. She
had nothing to do but live and bloom.
When she had been married a year,
her own individual passion came upon
her. One day she went up into the
shed chamber in search of an old sad-
dle Andrew remembered as one of the
family holdings, and found herself in a
mysterious workshop. This was the
weaving room. It had a strange look
of waiting, of holding secrets it was
ready to divulge, of keeping a strange
silence it might some time break. In-
stant recognition laid hold on her. At
first it seemed curiosity; then it grew
into something more piquing. Thrown
upon a bench, as if the last weaver had
left it there, was a book written in a
delicate yet unformed hand, in faded
ink upon a yellowed page. She turned
it swiftly. There were the patterns for
weaving the old blue coverlets of which
the house already had a store. The
names made her breathless with their
sound of homely poesy : Bachelor's
Fancy, Girl's Love, Primrose and Dia-
monds, Chariot Wheels and Church
Windows, Pansies and Roses in the
Wilderness. There were full directions
in the faded hand, and the patterns had
been made in the careful drawing of
one who rules her lines and works from a
pathetic ignorance. Cynthia ran down-
stairs tumultuously, and unfurled the
book before Andrew where he sat mend-
ing the harness.
"See here! " she cried. "See what
I 've found."
Andrew looked up with an abstracted
interest.
"Oh," said he, "that 's Argentine's
book."
" Who was Argentine ? "
"She was great-grandmother Pyn-
cheon's sister. She was a great weaver.
She stuck to it when everybody else had
give it up. She was goin' to be mar-
ried, but he was lost at sea, an' after
that she never did much but weave.
Them coverlets you set such store by
were all hers."
Cynthia had treasured the coverlets
with an unreasoning love. Their pat-
tern pleased her. The close firm weave
awoke respect, beside more modern fab-
rics. New passion stirred in her from
that first interest.
" 0 Andrew ! " she breathed, " do you
s'pose I could weave coverlets? "
It was not Andrew's custom to deny
anything in their little world.
" I guess so, " said he indulgently.
"I guess you could do anything you set
out to. Mebbe old Foss could put you
on the road."
Old Foss lived a mile away, in a lit-
tle house filled with treasures of ancient
usage which he seemed to prize only
because collectors came at intervals and
fixed a market value in his mind. Next
Bachelor's Fancy.
39
day Andrew hitched up and went down
to borrow him ; but Foss clung to his
hearthstone. He could weave, he said,
but weaving had gone out. He guessed
with cotton cloth as cheap as it was
now, there 's no need of wastin' any-
body's time over a loom. Next day,
Cynthia herself went down with her
book of patterns, and he gave her a few
grudging rules. Then she started on
her ignorant way, and to-day was the
culmination of long desire. Bachelor's
Fancy was in process of growth. It
was only a question of time when she
should have a coverlet of her own to
hoard with Argentine's.
The silence in the shed chamber grew
more drowsy with the mounting day.
Suddenly Cynthia was aware that she
was more than half asleep, nodding
over the verge of something almost tan-
gible, it was so deep and still. She was
hungry, too, but that she scarcely knew.
A slice of bread and a cup of milk had
made her early breakfast, and since then
this breathless achievement had lifted
her outside the pale of daily needs.
But now she rose and went swaying
down the stairs, her eyelids heavy.
The house below was still. Andrew
had been away a week with the thresh-
ing machine, leaving- the next neighbor
to milk and "feed the critters." Cyn-
thia had half promised to go over to the
neighbor's house to sleep, but the pas-
sion for weaving had so engrossed her
that now she scarcely knew light from
darkness, and the short intervals in her
work it seemed foolish to spend away
from home. Besides, she missed An-
drew less if she stayed in their familiar
places, where the walls were reminiscent
of him. In the bottom of her heart was
always a crying hunger for him, an
aching loneliness. But she could bear
it. She had the weaving and a child's
eager hope to bring him the work of
her own hands.
Down there in the kitchen she looked
about and smiled a sleepy smile at
its disorder. Her plate and cup were
on the table, and there was a pile of
dishes in the sink. Even the milk
pails were unwashed, and she did shrink
momentarily under the guilt of that.
"O my soul ! " said she.
Ashes had blown across the hearth,
and the kitten had rolled an egg from
the table to the rug. Through the open
bedroom door her unmade bed was
yawning. It was sweet and clean.
The sun lay brightly on the tick, and the
autumn breeze blew on snowy sheets.
Yet it was disorder, and Cynthia knew
it, as any housewife would know, or
any man used to the rigor of routine.
She was a slattern. Her house tattled
the tale even to her own eyes. Never-
theless, she had achieved Bachelor's
Fancy, and her mouth curled in a smile
that widened to a pretty yawn. She
stretched herself out on the lounge and
went to sleep.
There was a step on the threshold,
impatient, swift. Cynthia opened her
eyes from deep beatitude to a flood of
noon sunlight in the disordered room,
and a figure standing in the midst of
it. She rose to her elbow, pushing back
her hair. Then she gave a cry : —
"Andrew! Andrew! O Andrew!"
She was on her feet, on tiptoe to fly to
him, but his face arrested her. "An-
drew! " she called, "what is it? "
He had had a hard week. A man had
failed them, and he had been doing dou-
ble work, feeding the machine in dust
and heat and for two days with a beard
of barley in his eye. They had taken
the threshing by the job, and he had put
it through madly, to get home to Cyn-
thia, spurred always by the certainty of
her loneliness, and half ashamed of his
childish worry over her. He was dead
tired, he was hungry, dirty, hot. Even
his face was blackened from the dust,
and little moist runnels had streaked
and whitened it. The sight of him
amazed her, and she stood there a-wing,
ready to go to him, her child's cheeks
creased with drowsiness and her great
eyes dark. But something about his set
40
Bachelor's Fancy.
mouth and glowing eyes forbade her
nearer greeting.
"0 Andrew! " she breathed again,
"I did n't think you 'd come."
"You did n't think I 'd come ? Why
did n't you? "
Instantly there flashed into her mind
a story she had heard about the Gale
temper. Andrew was a slow man, the
neighbors said, "till you got him
roused. Then you better stan' from
under." Andrew had owned it to her
once, with a shamefaced grin. But after
his confession they had both laughed,
and she had felt his arms about her in
that mutual understanding which was
more than human trust, but a some-
thing ineffable neither could define.
Now for the first time in her life there
was a barrier between them, invisible
but potent. She did not dare approach
him.
" Why did n t you think so ? " he re-
peated.
She faltered in her answer. "You
said 'twould be a week."
"It 's been a week. I said I 'd be
here Thursday noon."
" Yes " — she opened her mouth in
futile protest and then closed it. But
the truth came to her, and she told it
with a childlike confidence that it would
be the same to Andrew as to her. "I
got weaving. I forgot."
"You got weaving! " he repeated.
Then he looked about the room, and its
disorder made satirical commentary on
her words. But Cynthia had gained
courage. The mention of her new tri-
umph reminded her that she had a joy
to bring him.
"O Andrew! " she breathed, "I 've
learned it. I 've learned Bachelor's
Fancy. Mine 's as good as Argen-
tine's."
Andrew stood looking at her for a
moment, her distended eyes, her pretty
mouth where the smile was just begin-
ning, and would come if he invited it.
But at that moment the smile was not
for him. It meant a child's absorption
in a foolish game, and oblivion of him
for whom there was hard work and
barley beards. He turned abruptly.
"Well," he announced, "I've got
no more to say."
He had taken a step toward the open
door, but her voice followed him. It
was sharp with quick alarm.
"Andrew, where you goin' ? "
He turned upon her.
"I '11 tell you where I 'm goin'. I 'm
goin' on to Trumbull's with the thrash-
ers, an' get a meal o' victuals."
"But, Andrew, I '11 get dinner. I
can, in no time. There 's eggs. You
like eggs, Andrew."
"Mebbe you don't remember what
we said that last mornin' I set off. I
told ye I 'd bring Miles an' t'other men
to dinner. It ain't been out o' my
mind a minute. For two days I 've
been houndin' 'em to finish up, so 's
we could git here this noon. What do
you s'pose I wanted to do it for? I
wanted to show off. I wanted to let
'em see how well we were fixed. An'
this kitchen don't look as if there 'd
been a meal o' victuals cooked in it
sence the time o' Noah. It ain't a
kitchen; it 's a hurrah's nest."
"O Andrew! " She backed pite-
ously away from him, with a sudden,
alien sense of a house not her own.
She seemed to herself in that instant
to be not his wife, but a guest by whom
his hospitality had been abused. Then
again she trembled into speech. "May-
be you 've done with me, Andrew.
Maybe you don't want me to stay here
any more."
"I don't care what ye do nor where
ye go," said Andrew blindly. "I'm
goin' to Trumbull's." He strode out
and away down the path, and she heard
him hailing the threshers at the gate.
They answered jovially, and then the
heavy team went grinding on.
She sat down upon the couch and
looked about her. The sun came cru-
elly in at the window, and showed the
room in all its dusty disarray. The
Bachelor's Fancy.
41
dazed spot in her brain cleared, like a
lifting sedative, and left her vulnerable
to pain. She saw his house as he had
seen it, and for the instant felt how he
had hated it and her. With that cer-
tainty she met also the ultimate pang
of youth which knows when its hour is
spoiled, and says, "This is the end."
There was but one thing to do. She
must take herself away. She went to
the cupboard and reached to the up-
per shelf where old Hannah used to
keep her toothache drops. There was
laudanum enough in them, Andrew had
said, to kill an army. It would kill
her. But as she stood there in the
stillness with the bottle in her hand,
distaste came upon her for the ugliness
of such a death, and that moment,
sounding in her ears, she heard the sea.
Whether it was because she had begun
her life by it or through some quickness
of the mind, running over the possibil-
ities of a decent death, she remembered
a little mate of hers who had been play-
ing in a dory when the anchor slipped,
and had drifted out, never to be seen
again. And now the sea was calling
her.
"You gimme a match, won't ye? "
called old Nancy Hutchens from the
door. "I won't come in. I 'm all*
over muck from the swamp down there.
I crossed by the willers, to save steps."
Cynthia tucked the bottle back in its
place and crossed the kitchen swiftly,
taking a card of matches as she went.
Old Nancy stood there on the door-
stone, a squat figure with one shoulder
higher than the other. She had the
imposing equipment of an aquiline nose
and sound white teeth at seventy.
Her thick gray hair was drawn back
into a knot, and the lines in her brown
face were crisp and deep. A life soli-
tary in itself, and yet spent among peo-
ple in a drifting way, had touched her
face with little quizzical shades of
meaning. Her cold pipe was in her
hand, waiting to be filled.
" Here 's the matches, " said Cynthia.
Nancy took them with a mechanical
touch, and remained looking at her.
" Law ! " said she, " 't ain't wuth it."
"What ain't? " repeated Cynthia.
" What you 've got on your mind,
whatever 't is. Wait a day an' it '11 be
a thing o' the past. If 't ain't in a
day, 't will be in a year, or ten year,
or a lifetime. Wait long enough, an'
the whole on us '11 be underground."
"Yes," said Cynthia, "we shall be
underground." But her mind was not
with the old woman, but on her own
preparations for flight. The tawdry
room still troubled her, the slatternly
picture he must find when he came
home. She would leave his house in
order for him. "Look here, Nancy,"
said she suddenly, "you stay the rest
o' the day an' help me clean."
Nancy smiled satirically. She looked
up at the blue sky, sown with flying
white, and then over the line of upland
where her fate, every day renewed, was
waiting for her.
"I don't clean for myself," she
said. "My bed ain't been made nor
slep' in for a fortnight. I been tramp-
in' the countryside."
"I '11 give you a dollar!"
"I ain't got much use for dollars till
winter time, an' then I guess I shall be
provided for. I got a passel o' herbs
to sell this fall." But she was search-
ing Cynthia's face with her impersonal
glance, and her mind altered. "Law,
yes! " said she. "It 's as good a way
o' passin' time as any other. You let
me pull off these muddy boots. You
got a pair o' rubbers I can scuff round
in? Where you goin' to begin? "
With the word, she had caught up
an old pair of Andrew's shoes beside
the shed door, and slipped her feet into
them. Cynthia left her, and went fly-
ing upstairs with an unregarding haste.
She went first to the shed chamber, and,
without a glance at her precious handi-
work, closed the door upon it. Then,
running to the other rooms in turn, she
breathed dull satisfaction at finding
42
Bachelor's Fancy.
them in comfortable array. There was
the west chamber; she had put that in
order when aunt Patten had been ex-
pected, a week before, to spend the
night, and the other rooms had to match
it because aunt Patten would go mous-
ing round. Cynthia had laughed with
Andrew, in the doing, over so patently
setting her scene for a meddler. But
aunt Patten had diverged, on her vis-
iting way, and Cynthia's pains had
seemed unnecessary.
At the foot of the stairs Nancy was
awaiting her. She had an air of large
leisure; yet in some subtle fashion her
man's attitude showed the reserve
strength in her and inspired content.
"What be I goin' to fly at fust? "
she asked indulgently, as at a madness
not her own.
"You sweep the sittin'-room, " re-
turned Cynthia. "When the dust is
settled, you can do the winders. I '11
begin on the bedroom."
Cynthia did not, it seemed to her,
think at all as she went about her work,
doing it swiftly and still with the far-
off sound of the sea in her ears. She
was simply a different creature from
that other happy woman who had been
weaving coverlets that morning. She
had brought upon herself a colossal pun-
ishment. She never stopped to won-
der whether the punishment were just.
It was simply there.
At one she and Nancy had some eggs
and tea, and in mid afternoon they met
in the kitchen, each about her task.
Cynthia was baking now, cream o' tar-
tar biscuits and custard pie, and Nancy
was cleaning the woodwork with great
sweeps of her lean arm.
"I didn't know you was such a
driver," she said at length, as. she sat
on the top of the step-ladder, taking a
pull at her pipe.
"I guess I ain't been," said Cyn-
thia, her pretty brows in a painstaking
frown over the scalloped edges of the
pie. "I ain't done much housework."
" You like it ? " asked Nancy.
A swift terror fled across Cynthia's
face, like a beating wing. At that mo-
ment she liked housework better than
anything on earth. It was not a cold
routine. It had at last a poignant
meaning. It meant Andrew and her
home. But she answered stolidly, "I
guess so."
"If you 've took it on yourself,
you 've got to like it, " said Nancy phil-
osophically, rising and knocking the
ashes from her pipe. "You hand me
up that bar soap. That 's the wust o'
menfolks. Once you 've got 'em, you
got to slave for 'em. Lug 'em or leave
'em! But don't git 'em, I say. Look
here, now! Fifty year ago come No-
vember, I said I 'd marry a man down
Sudleigh way. I went to stay a spell
with his mother. Well, sir! I come
home an' I broke it off. ' I ain't a-goin'
to spend my days makin' sugar ginger-
bread,' says I. 'No, sir! Nor cuttin'
it out in an oak-leaf pattern, — not by
a long chalk! '
" He likes sugar gingerbread, " said
Cynthia to herself. "I guess I got
time to make some."
"I warrant ye the colored pop 'lation
never felt freer 'n I did when I see him
walkin' away down the path arter I
told him 't was broke off," chuckled
Nancy, moving the step-ladder along.
"I never had a minute's sorrer over it,
— not a second."
"I guess I '11 put in a mite o' gin-
ger, " said Cynthia, stirring breathless-
ly. "Do you use ginger, Nancy? "
"Law! I dunno what ye do, it's
so long sence I 've tried any. I don't
concern myself with sweet trade. I
can make as good a meal as I want out
o' crackers an' cheese an' wash it down
with a drink o' water out o' the well.
Look here ! did it ever come into your
head that everybody ain't called to
preach, an' everybody ain't called to
marry? "
"Some ain't fit," said Cynthia bit-
terly, her passionate mind on her own
defects, "they ain't fit to marry."
Bachelor's Fancy.
43
" 'T ain't only that, — they 're like a
bird in a cage. You look here! men-
folks think they 're dull sometimes, set-
tled down in a pint measure with one
woman. Lordymighty ! the women 's
dull, too, on'y they don't let on. Pious
little devils ! they go round washin'
dishes an' moppin' up under the sto',
and half on 'em wants to be trampin'
like me, an' t'other half dunno what
they want. Keep out on 't, I say ! keep
out on't! "
Nancy lifted her voice in a tuneful
stave, the words satirically fit, but Cyn-
thia was not listening. The notes fell
upon her like a patter of unregarded
rain, as she creased her gingerbread
and beat her mind back from futile
wonderment over her own plight when
Andrew should be here alone.
"The house has got to be jes' so,"
pursued Nancy. "The woman 's got
to be jes' so. They can come home all
over gurry, but she 's got to have on a
clean apron an' her hair slicked up to
the nines. They can set all the even-
in' huskin' together an' hootin' over
old stories, an' come stumblin' in when
they git ready, an' find doughnuts an'
pie set out complete. What 's fair for
one 's fair for another, I say."
"No, it ain't! " cried Cynthia, sud-
denly awakened. She stood straight and
slender in the middle of her kitchen.
Defensive fires burned hotly in her
eyes. "Nancy, I ain't goin' to have
such talk in here. I can't stand it.
You think of him gettin' all over dust
an' dirt workin' like a dog. You think
of it, Nancy! It's his house. It's
no more 'n right he should have it the
way he wants it. I should like to know
if he ain't goin' to have anything the
way he wants it? " Her voice choked
in passionate championship of the man
whose pride was hurt.
But Nancy only gave a derisive
chuckle. "Law! " said she. "You
needn't worry. I guess they'll look
out for themselves. I never see a man
yet but had time enough for that."
At five o'clock the house was in or-
der and Nancy had started on her
homeward way, a dollar in her pocket,
and, despite some ruthless indifference
on her part, a basket of food in her
hand. Cynthia dismissed her with an
unwitting solemnity.
"Good-by, Nancy," said she.
"You 've been a real help to me. I
don't know how I should have got
through it if it hadn't been for you."
"It's clean as a ribbin, " Nancy
called back cheerfully. "But land!
cleanin' up 's nothin'. Trouble is to
keep it so. Well, I '11 be pokin'
along. "
Cynthia stood and watched her well-
knit figure swinging on between the
willows that marked the road. Then
she turned back to her clean house for
a last look and the renewed certainty
of its perfect state. She walked deli-
cately about the kitchen, lest a grain of
dust should be tracked upon the speck-
less floor. The food not yet cooled from
the oven was in the pantry. All through
the lower rooms there was the fragrance
of cake and bread. It was a house set
in order, and finding it perfect, she made
herself sweet and clean, and changed
her working dress for a crisper calico.
In the doing, she thought solemnly how
she had once helped bathe a child that
had died at the poorhouse, and prepare
it for burial. This body of hers was
also being prepared, and though she had
no words to say so, it seemed to her
the body of her love. And all the time
the sea kept calling her, with its assur-
ances of manifold and solemn refuge.
Presently she was ready to go. She
had made the clothing she had slipped
off into a little bundle, to leave none
but fresh things behind her, and now she
took it in her hand and stepped out at
the front door. That she closed, but
the windows were still open. It was
better that storms should invade the
house than that he should find it inhos-
pitably shut. Day and night could be
trusted with their welcome to him.
44
Bachelor's Fancy.
But turning from the door, she smelled
her garden, and its autumn bitterness of
breath awoke in her a final pang of
homesickness. She laid down her bun-
dle and hurried round to the well, to
draw bucket after bucket of water and
drench the roots she had kept tended
since the spring. It was a separate good-
by to every one. Here were the deli-
cate firstlings whose day had long been
over, and the hollyhocks that had made
the summer gay. Dahlias and asters
were the ones to keep this later watch,
but she sprinkled them impartially,
whether they were to bloom again or
wither till the winter's spell. The moon
was rising behind the wooded hill, and
there was suddenly a prophetic touch of
frost in the air. She stood for a moment
listening to the stillness, recognizing
life as if it all came flooding in on her
at once, only to retreat like a giant
wave and wash some farther shore.
Her brain apprehended what her tongue
could never say. She understood the
meaning of service and harmonious liv-
ing. It was no more dull to her now
than daily sunrise. She looked at An-
drew's house, builded by another Gale
over a hundred years ago. It meant
more than a shelter. It was the roof
of love, the nest of springing hopes.
Yet being a child at heart, she could
not stay after he had found her for one
day unworthy, and she was too young
to know how storms may pass.
The man came heavily along the dark-
ened road and reached the gate as she
did. She saw him and dropped her bun-
dle in the shade of the lilac at the fence.
Andrew did not speak. He threw open
the gate, stepped in, and put his arms
about her. He held her to him as we
hold what is almost lost us through our
own lax grasp ; but when he spoke to
her, she did not hear, and when he loosed
his clasp to look at her, she sank down
and would have fallen.
"Cynthy.for God's sake! " he cried,
and his voice recalled her. Then she
gained her feet, he helping her.
" What is it, dear ? what is it, dear ? "
he kept saying, and she answered him
with her tremulous breath upon his
cheek. Presently they went up the path
together, and in at the closed door.
"By George, don't it smell good! " said
Andrew. His voice, in nervous jovial-
ity, was shaking, like his hands. "Le'
me git a light, honey. I 've got to
look at you. Got to make sure you 're
here!"
The blaze from the shining lamp
struck full on her, and Andrew caught
his breath. Cynthia looked like the
angel of herself. Her tired face, over-
laid by joy, was like that of a child
awakened from sleep to unexpected wel-
come. She seemed an adoring hand-
maid, incredulous of the beauty of her
task. Andrew felt the wistfulness of
her air, the presence of things unknown
to him. He went over to her and drew
her nearer.
"You knew I'd come," he said.
"You knew I could n't stan' it after
I 'd been ugly to you. Look at this
house! You fixed all up, an' made it
neat as wax. I started just as they set
down to supper, an' put for home. I 've
been scairt 'most to death all the after-
noon. I dunno what I thought would
happen to you, but I had to come."
"I 've cleaned the house," said Cyn-
thia, like a child. "I got old Nancy."
"Yes, dear, yes," he soothed her.
"You knew I 'd come. You knew I
would n't stay away a night after I
broke your heart. You tell about your
weavin', dear. I want to hear it now. "
"My weavin'?" repeated Cynthia
vaguely. The words roused her a lit-
tle from her happy dream, and for one
luminous instant she felt the signifi-
cance of all the threads that make the
web of life. She laughed. "'Twas
only Bachelor's Fancy," she said. "I
learned it, that 's all. There 's lots o'
things I 'd ruther do. You go in the
pantry, dear, an' look."
Andrew left her with a kiss that was
like meeting, not good-by. But as
Fra Paolo Sarpi.
45
he took the lamp from the table, Cyn-
thia slipped out at the front door.
"Where you goin' ? " he called.
"Only out to the lilac, " she answered
throbbingly. "I dropped somethin'
there."
While he lingered for her, she came
back and, as she ran, tossed her little
bundle into the closet under the stairs.
The hues of youth were on her face.
Her eyes were wet and glad.
"I'm terrible hungry, too," she
told him. "Come! there 's sugar gin-
gerbread."
Alice Brown.
FRA PAOLO SARPI.
A THOUGHTFUL historian tells us that,
between the fourteenth century and the
nineteenth, Italy produced three great
men. As the first of these, he names
Machiavelli, who, he says, " taught the
world to understand political despotism
and to hate it ; " as the second, he names
Sarpi, who " taught the world after
what manner the Holy Spirit guides the
Councils of the Church ; " and as the
third, Galileo, who " taught the world
what dogmatic theology is worth when
it can be tested by science."
I purpose now to present the second
of these. As a man, he was by far the
greatest of the three and, in various re-
spects, the most interesting ; for he not
only threw a bright light into the most
important general council of the Church
and revealed to Christendom the methods
which there prevailed, — in a book which
remains one of the half-dozen classic his-
tories of the world, — but he fought the
most bitter fight for humanity against
the papacy ever known in any Latin na-
tion, and won a victory by which the
whole world has profited ever since.
Moreover, he was one of the two fore-
most Italian statesmen since the Middle
Ages, the other being Cavour.
He was born at Venice in 1552, and
it may concern those who care to note
the subtle interweaving of the warp and
woof of history that the birth year of
this most resourceful foe that Jesuitism
ever had was the death year of St.
Francis Xavier, the noblest of Jesuit
apostles.
It may also interest those who study
the more evident evolution of cause and
effect in human affairs to note that, like
most strong men, he had a strong mother ;
that while his father was a poor shop-
keeper who did little and died young,
his mother was wise and serene.
From his earliest boyhood, he showed
striking gifts and characteristics. He
never forgot a face once seen, could take
in the main contents of a page at a
glance, spoke little, rarely ate meat, and,
until his last years, never drank wine.
Brought up, after the death of his
father, first by his uncle, a priest, and
then by Capella, a Servite monk, in
something better than the usual priestly
fashion, he became known, while yet in
his boyhood, as a theological prodigy.
Disputations in his youth, especially one
at Mantua, where, after the manner of
the time, he successfully defended sev-
eral hundred theses against all comers,
attracted wide attention, so that the
Bishop gave him a professorship, and
the Duke, who, like some other crowned
heads of those days, — notably Henry
VIII. and James I., — liked to dabble
in theology, made him a court theologian.
But the duties of this position were
uncongenial : a flippant duke, fond of
putting questions which the wisest theo-
46
Fra Paolo Sarpi.
logian could not answer, and laying out
work which the young scholar evidently
thought futile, apparently wearied him.
He returned to the convent of the Ser-
vites at Venice, and became, after a few
years' novitiate, a friar, changing, at the
same time, his name ; so that, having been
baptized Peter, he now became Paul.
His career soon seemed to reveal an-
other and underlying cause of his re-
turn : he evidently felt the same impulse
which stirred his contemporaries, 'Lord
Bacon and Galileo ; for he began devot-
ing himself to the whole range of scien-
tific and philosophical studies, especial-
ly to mathematics, physics, astronomy,
anatomy, and physiology. In these he
became known as an authority, and be-
fore long was recognized as such through-
out Europe. It is claimed, and it is not
improbable, that he anticipated Harvey in
discovering the circulation of the blood,
and that he was the forerunner of noted
discoveries in magnetism. Unfortunate-
ly the loss of the great mass of his papers
by the fire which destroyed his convent
in 1769 forbids any full estimate of his
work ; but it is certain that among those
who sought his opinion and advice were
such great discoverers as Acquapendente,
Galileo, Torricelli, and Gilbert of Col-
chester, and that every one of these re-
ferred to him as an equal, and indeed as
a master. It seems also established that
it was he who first discovered the valves
of the veins, that he made known the
most beautiful function of the iris, — its
contractility, — and that various surmises
of his regarding heat, light, and sound
have since been developed into scientific
truths. It is altogether likely that, had
he not been drawn from scientific pur-
suits by his duties as a statesman, he
would have ranked among the greater
investigators and discoverers, not only
of Italy, but of the world.
He also studied political and social
problems, and he arrived at one conclu-
sion which, though now trite, was then
novel, — the opinion that the aim of pun-
ishment should not be vengeance, but
reformation. In these days and in this
country, where one of the most serious of
evils is undue lenity to crime, this opin-
ion may be imputed to him as a fault ;
but in those days, when torture was the
main method in procedure and in penal-
ty, his declaration was honorable both to
his head and heart.
With all his devotion to books, he
found time to study men. Even at
school, he had seemed to discern those
who would win control. They discerned
something in him also ; so that close re-
lations were formed between him and
such leaders as Contarini and Morosini,
with whom he afterwards stood side by
side in great emergencies.
Important missions were entrusted to
him. Five times he visited Rome to
adjust perplexing differences between
the papal power and various interests
at Venice. He was rapidly advanced
through most of the higher offices in his
order, and in these he gave a series of
decisions which won the respect of all
entitled to form an opinion.
Naturally he was thought of for high
place in the Church, and was twice pre-
sented for a bishopric ; but each time he
was rejected at Rome, — partly from
family claims of less worthy candidates,
partly from suspicions regarding his
orthodoxy. It was objected that he did
not find the whole doctrine of the Trinity
in the first verse of Genesis, that he cor-
responded with eminent heretics of Eng-
land and Germany, that he was not
averse to reforms, that, in short, he was
not inclined to wallow in the slime from
which had crawled forth such huge in-
carnations of evil as John XXIII., Ju-
lius II., Sixtus IV., and Alexander VI.
His orthodox detractors have been
wont to represent him as seeking ven-
geance for his non-promotion ; but his
after career showed amply that personal
grievances had little effect upon him. It
is indeed not unlikely that when he saw
bishoprics for which he knew himself
Fra Paolo Sarpi.
well fitted given as sops to poor crea-
tures utterly unfit in morals or intellect,
he may have had doubts regarding the
part taken by the Almighty in selecting
them ; but he was reticent, and kept on
with his work. In his cell at Santa Fosca,
he quietly and steadily devoted himself to
his cherished studies ; but he continued
to study more than books or inanimate
nature. He was neither a bookworm nor
a pedant. On his various missions he
met and discoursed with churchmen and
statesmen concerned in the greatest trans-
actions of his time, notably at Mantua
with Oliva, secretary of one of the great-
est ecclesiastics at the Council of Trent ;
at Milan with Cardinal Borrorneo, by far
the noblest of all who sat in that assem-
blage during its eighteen years ; in Rome
and elsewhere with Arnauld Ferrier,
who had been French Ambassador at the
Council, Cardinal Severina, head of the
Inquisition, Castagna, afterward Pope
Urban VII. , and Cardinal Bellarmine,
afterward Sarpi's strongest and noblest
opponent.
Nor was this all. He was not content
with books or conversations ; steadily he
went on collecting, collating, and testing
original documents bearing upon the
great events of his time. The result of
all this the world was to see later.
He had arrived at middle life and won
wide recognition as a scholar, scientific
investigator, and jurist, when there came
the supreme moment of a struggle which
had involved Europe for centuries, — a
struggle interesting not only the Italy
and Europe of those days, but universal
humanity for all time.
During the period following the fall of
the Roman Empire of the West there
had been evolved the temporal power of
the Roman Bishop. It had many vicis-
situdes. Sometimes, as in the days of St.
Leo and St. Gregory, it based its claims
upon noble assertions of right and justice,
and sometimes, as in the hands of pon-
tiffs like Innocent VIII. and Paul V., it
sought to force its way by fanaticism.
Sometimes it strengthened its authority
by real services to humanity, and some-
times by such monstrous frauds as the
Forged Decretals. Sometimes, as under
Popes like Gregory VII. and Innocent
III., it laid claim to the mastership of the
world, and sometimes, as with the ma-
jority of the pontiffs during the two cen-
turies before the Reformation, it became
mainly the appanage of a party or faction
or family.
Throughout all this history, there ap-
peared in the Church two great currents
of efficient thought. On one side had
been developed a theocratic theory, giving
the papacy a power supreme in temporal
as well as in spiritual matters through-
out the world. Leaders in this during the
Middle Ages were St. Thomas Aquinas
and the Dominicans; leaders in Sarpi's
days were the Jesuits, represented espe-
cially in the treatises of Bellarmine at
Rome and in the speeches of Laynez at
the Council of Trent.1
But another theory, hostile to the des-
potism of the Church over the State, had
been developed through the Middle Ages
and the Renaissance ; — it had been
strengthened mainly by the utterances
of such men as Dante, ^Egidio Colonna,
John of Paris, Ockham, Marsilio of
Padua, and Laurentius Valla. Sarpi
ranged himself with the latter of these
forces. Though deeply religious, he re-
cognized the God-given right of earthly
governments to discharge their duties
independent of church control.
Among the many centres of this strug-
gle was Venice. She was splendidly re-
ligious — as religion was then under-
stood. She was made so by her whole
environment. From the beginning she
had been a seafaring power, and seafar-
ing men, from their constant wrestle with
dangers ill understood, are prone to seek
and find supernatural forces. Nor was
this all. Later, when she had become
1 This has heen admirably shown by N. R. F.
Brown in his Taylorian Lecture, pages 229-234,
in volume for 1889-99.
48
Fra Paolo Sarpi.
rich, powerful, luxurious, licentious, and
refractory to the priesthood, her most
powerful citizens felt a need of atoning
for their many sins by splendid religious
foundations. So her people came to live
in an atmosphere of religious observance,
and the bloom and fruitage of their reli-
gious hopes and fears are seen in the whole
history of Venetian art, — from the rude
sculptures of Torcello and the naive mo-
saics of San Marco to the glowing altar-
pieces and ceilings of John Bellini, Titian,
and Tintoretto and the illuminations of
the Grimani Psalter. No class in Venice
rose above this environment. Doges and
Senators were as susceptible to it as were
the humblest fishermen on the Lido. In
every one of those glorious frescoes in
the corridors and halls of the Ducal Pal-
ace which commemorate the victories of
the Republic, the triumphant Doge or
Admiral or General is seen on his knees
making acknowledgment of the divine
assistance. On every Venetian sequin,
from the days when Venice was a power
throughout the earth to that fatal year
when the young Bonaparte tossed the
Republic over to the House of Austria,
the Doge, crowned and robed, kneels
humbly before the Saviour, the Virgin, or
St. Mark. In that vast Hall of the Five
Hundred, the most sumptuous room in
the world, there is spread above the heads
of the Doge and Senators and Council-
ors, as an incentive to the discharge of
their duties on earth, a representation of
the blessed in Heaven.
From highest to lowest, the Venetians
lived, moved, and had their being in this
religious environment, and, had their Re-
public been loosely governed, its external
policy would have been largely swayed
by this all-pervading religious feeling,
and would have become the plaything of
the Roman Court. But a democracy has
never been maintained save by the dele-
gation of great powers to its chosen lead-
ers. It was the remark of one of the fore-
most American Democrats of the nine-
teenth century, a man who received the
highest honors which his party could
bestow, that the Constitution of the
United States was made, not to promote
Democracy, but to check it. This state-
ment is true, and it is as true of the Ve-
netian Constitution as of the American.1
But while both the republics recognized
the necessity of curbing Democracy, the
difference between the means employed
was world-wide. The founders of the
American Republic gave vast powers and
responsibilities to a president and un-
heard-of authority to a supreme court ;
in the Venetian Republic the Doge was
gradually stripped of power, but there
was evolved the mysterious and unlim-
ited authority of the Senate and Council
of Ten.
In these sat the foremost Venetians,
thoroughly imbued with the religious
spirit of their time ; but, religious as they
were, they were men of the world, trained
in the politics of all Europe and espe-
cially of Italy.
In a striking passage, Guizot has shown
how the Crusaders who went to the Orient
by way of Italy and saw the papacy near
at hand came back skeptics. This same
influence shaped the statesmen of Venice.
The Venetian Ambassadors were the fore-
most in Europe. Their Relations are
still studied as the clearest, shrewdest,
and wisest statements regarding the men
and events in Europe at their time. All
were noted for skill ; but the most skill-
ful were kept on duty at Rome. There
was the source of danger. The Doges,
Senators, and controlling Councilors had,
as a rule, served in these embassies, and
they had formed lucid judgments as to
Italian courts in general and as to the
Roman Court in particular. No men had
known the Popes and the Curia more
thoroughly. They had seen Innocent
VIII. buy the papacy for money. They
had been at the Vatican when Alexander
VI. had won renown as a secret murderer.
They had seen, close at hand, the merci-
1 See Horatio Seymour's noted article in the
North American Review.
Fra Paolo Sarpi.
49
less cruelty of Julius II. They had care-
fully noted the crimes of Sixtus IV.,
which culminated in the assassination of
Julian de' Medici beneath the dome of
Florence at the moment the Host was up-
lifted. They had sat near Leo X. while
he enjoyed the obscenities of the Ca-
landria and the Mandragora, — plays
which, in the most corrupt of modern cit-
ies, would, in our day, be stopped by the
police. No wonder that, in one of their
dispatches, they speak of Rome as " the
cloaca of the world." *
Naturally, then, while their religion
showed itself in wonderful monuments of
every sort, their practical sense was shown
by a steady opposition to papal encroach-
ments.
Of this combination of zeal for religion
with hostility to ecclesiasticism we have
striking examples throughout the his-
tory of the Republic. While, in every
other European state, cardinals, bishops,
priests, and monks were given leading
parts in civil administration and, in some
states, a monopoly of civil honors, the
Republic of Venice not only excluded all
ecclesiastics from such posts, but, in cases
which touched church interests, she ex-
cluded even the relatives of ecclesiastics.
When church authority decreed that com-
merce should not be maintained with infi-
dels and heretics, the Venetian merchants
continued to deal with Turks, Pagans,
Germans, Englishmen, and Dutchmen
as before. When the Church decreed
that the taking of interest for money was
sin, and great theologians published in
Venice some of their mightiest treatises
demonstrating this view from Holy Scrip-
ture and the Fathers, the Venetians con-
tinued borrowing and lending money on
usance. When efforts were made to en-
force that tremendous instrument for the
consolidation of papal power, the bull
In Coena Domini, Venice evaded and
even defied it. When the Church frowned
1 For Sixtus IV. and his career, -with the
tragedy in the Cathedral of Florence, see Vil-
lari's Life of Machiavelli, English Edition, vol.
VOL. xcin. — NO. 555. 4
upon anatomical dissections, the Vene-
tians allowed Andreas Vesalius to make
such dissections at their University of
Padua. When Sixtus V., the strongest
of all the Popes, had brought all his pow-
ers, temporal and spiritual, to bear against
Henry IV. of France as an excommuni-
cated heretic, and seemed ready to hurl
the thunderbolts of the Church against
any power which should recognize him,
the Venetian Republic not only recog-
nized him, but treated his Ambassador
with especial courtesy. When the other
Catholic powers, save France, yielded to
papal mandates and sent no representa-
tives to the coronation of James I. of
England, Venice was there represented.
When Pope after Pope issued endless
diatribes against the horrors of toleration,
the Venetians steadily tolerated in their
several sorts of worship Jews and Greeks,
Mohammedans and Armenians, with Pro-
testants of every sort who came to them
on business. When the Roman Index
forbade the publication of most important
works of leading authors, Venice de-
manded and obtained for her printers
rights which were elsewhere denied.
As to the religious restrictions which
touched trade, the Venetians in the pub-
lic councils, and indeed the people at
large, had come to know perfectly what
the papal theory meant, — with some of
its promoters, fanaticism, but with the
controlling power at Rome, revenue, rev-
enue to be derived from retailing dis-
pensations to infringe the holy rules.
This peculiar antithesis — nowhere
more striking than at Venice, on the one
side, religious fears and hopes ; on the
other, keen insight into the ways of ec-
clesiasticism — led to peculiar compro-
mises. The bankers who had taken inter-
est upon money, the merchants who had
traded with Moslems and heretics, in
their last hours frequently thought it best
to perfect their title to salvation by turn-
ii. pp. 341, 342. For the passages in the dis-
patches referred to, vide ibid. vol. i. p. 198.
50
Fra Paolo Sarpi,
ing over large estates to the Church.
Under the sway of this feeling, and es-
pecially of the terrors infused by priests
at deathbeds, mortmain had become in
Venice, as in many other parts of the
world, one of the most serious of evils.
Thus it was that the clergy came to pos-
sess between one fourth and one third of
the whole territory of the Republic, and
in its Bergamo district more than one
half ; and all this was exempt from tax-
ation. Hence it was that the Venetian
Senate found it necessary to devise a
legal check which should make such ab-
sorption of estates by the Church more
and more difficult.
There was a second cause of trouble.
In that religious atmosphere of Venice,
monastic orders of every sort grew lux-
uriantly, not only absorbing more and
more land to be held by the dead hand,
thus escaping the public burdens, but
ever absorbing more and more men and
women, and thus depriving the state of
any healthy and normal service from
them. Here, too, the Senate thought it
best to interpose a check : it insisted that
all new structures for religious orders
must be authorized by the State.
Yet another question flamed forth.
Of the monks of every sort swarming
through the city, many were luxurious
and some were criminal. On these last,
the Venetian Senate determined to lay
its hands, and in the first years of the
seventeenth century all these questions,
and various other matters distasteful to
the Vatican, culminated in the seizure
and imprisonment of two ecclesiastics
charged with various high crimes, —
among these rape and murder.
There had just come to the papal
throne Camillo Borghese, Paul V., —
strong, bold, determined, with the highest
possible theory of his duties and of his
1 For details of these cases of the two monks,
see Pascolato. Fra Paolo Sarpi, Milano, 1893,
pp. 126-128. For the Borghese avarice, see
Ranke's Popes, vol. iii. pp. 9-20. For the de-
velopment of Pope Paul's theory of govern-
position. In view of his duty toward him-
self, he lavished the treasures of the
faithful upon his family, until it became
the richest which had yet risen in Rome ;
in view of his duty toward the Church,
he built superbly, and an evidence of the
spirit in which he wrought is his name,
in enormous letters, still spread across
the facade of St. Peter's. As to his po-
sition, he accepted fully the theories and
practices of his boldest predecessors, and
in this he had good warrant ; for St.
Thomas Aquinas and Bellarmine had
furnished him with convincing arguments
that he was divinely authorized to rule the
civil powers of Italy and of the world.1
Moreover there was, in his pride, some-
thing akin to fanaticism. He had been
elected by one of those sudden movements,
as well known in American caucuses as in
papal conclaves, when, after a deadlock,
all the old candidates are thrown over,
and the choice suddenly falls on a new
man. The cynical observer may point
to this as showing that the laws govern-
ing elections, under such circumstances,
are the same, whether in party caucuses
or in church councils ; but Paul, in this
case, saw the direct intervention of the
Almighty, and his disposition to magnify
his office was vastly increased thereby.
He was especially strenuous, and one of
his earliest public acts was to send to the
gallows a poor author, who, in an unpub-
lished work, had spoken severely regard-
ing one of Paul's predecessors.
The Venetian laws checking mort-
main, taxing church property, and re-
quiring the sanction of the Republic be-
fore the erection of new churches and
monasteries greatly angered him ; but
the crowning vexation was the seizure
of the two clerics. This aroused him
fully. He at once sent orders that they
be delivered up to him, that apology be
ment, see Ranke, vol. ii. p. 345, and note, in
which Bellarmine's doctrine is cited textually ;
also Bellarmine's Selbstbiographie, herausge-
geben von Dollinger und Reusch. Bonn, 1887.
pp. 181, et seq.
Fra Paolo Sarpi.
51
made for the past and guarantees given
for the future, and notice was served that,
in case the Republic did not speedily
obey these orders, the Pope would ex-
communicate its leaders and lay an inter-
dict upon its people. It was indeed a
serious contingency. For many years
the new Pope had been known as a hard,
pedantic ecclesiastical lawyer, and now
that he had arrived at the supreme
power, he had evidently determined to
enforce the high mediaeval supremacy of
the Church over the State. Everything
betokened his success. In France he had
broken down all opposition to the decrees
of the Council of Trent. In Naples,
when a magistrate had refused to dis-
obey the civil law at the bidding of
priests, and the viceroy had supported
the magistrate, Pope Paul had forced the
viceroy and magistrate to comply with
his will by threats of excommunication.
In every part of Italy, — in Malta, in
Savoy, in Parma, in Lucca, in Genoa, —
and finally even in Spain, he had petti-
fogged, bullied, threatened, until his op-
ponents had given way. Everywhere he
was triumphant ; and while he was in the
mood which such a succession of triumphs
would give he turned toward Venice.1
There was little indeed to encourage
the Venetians to resist ; for, while the in-
terests of other European powers were
largely the same as theirs, current politi-
cal intrigues seemed likely to bring Spain
and even France into a league with the
Vatican.
To a people so devoted to commerce,
yet so religious, the threat of an inter-
dict was serious indeed. All church ser-
vices were to cease ; the people at large,
no matter how faithful, were to be as
brute beasts, — not to be legally married,
— not to be consoled by the sacraments,
— not to be shriven, and virtually not to
be buried ; other Christian peoples were
to be forbidden all dealings with them,
under pain of excommunication ; their
1 For letters showing the craven submission
of Philip III. of Spain at this time, see Cornet,
commerce was to be delivered over to
the tender mercies of any and every other
nation ; their merchant ships to be as
corsairs ; their cargoes, the legitimate
prey of all Christendom ; and their peo-
ple, on sea and land, to be held as ene-
mies of the human race. To this was
added, throughout the whole mass of the
people, a vague sense of awful penalties
awaiting them in the next world. Despite
all this, the Republic persisted in assert-
ing its right.
Just at this moment came a diplomatic
passage between Pope and Senate like a
farce before a tragedy, and it has histor-
ical significance, as showing what re-
sourceful old heads were at the service of
either side. The Doge Grimani having
died, the Vatican thought to score a point
by promptly sending notice through its
Nuncio to Venice that no new election
of a Doge could take place if forbidden
by the Pope, and that, until the Senate
had become obedient to the papacy, no
such election would be sanctioned. But
the Senate, having through its own Am-
bassador received a useful hint, was quite
equal to the occasion. It at once declined
to receive this or any dispatch from the
Pope on the plea, made with redundant
courtesy and cordiality, that, there being
no Doge, there was no person in Venice
great enough to open it. They next as
politely declined to admit the papal Nun-
cio on the ground that there was nobody
worthy to receive him. Then they pro-
ceeded to elect a Doge who could receive
both Nuncio and message, — a sturdy op-
ponent of the Vatican pretensions, Leo-
nardo Donato.
The Senate now gave itself entirely
to considering ways and means of warding
off the threatened catastrophe. Its first
step was to consult Sarpi. His answer
was prompt and pithy. He advised two
things : first, to prevent, at all hazards,
any publication of the papal bulls in Ven-
ice or any obedience to them ; secondly,
Paolo V. e la Republica Veneta, Vienna, 1859,
p. 285.
52
Fra Paolo Sarpi.
to hold in readiness for use at any mo-
ment an appeal to a future Council of the
Church.
Of these two methods, the first would
naturally seem by far the more difficult.
So it was not in reality. In the letter
which Sarpi presented to the Doge, he
devoted less than four lines to the first
and more than fourteen pages to the
second. As to the first remedy, severe
as it was and bristling with difficulties,
it was, as he claimed, a simple, natural,
straightforward use of police power. As
to the second, the appeal to a future
Council was to the Vatican as a red flag
to a bull. The very use of it involved ex-
communication. To harden and strength-
en the Doge and Senate in order that
they might consider it as an ultimate pos-
sibility, Sarpi was obliged to show from
the Scriptures, the Fathers, the Councils,
the early Popes, that the appeal to a
Council was a matter of right. With won-
derful breadth of knowledge and clear-
ness of statement he made his points and
answered objections. To this day, his
letter remains a masterpiece.1
The Republic utterly refused to yield,
and now, in 1606, Pope Paul launched
his excommunication and interdict. In
meeting them, the Senate took the course
laid down by Sarpi. The papal Nuncio
was notified that the Senate would re-
ceive no paper from the Pope ; all eccle-
siastics, from the Patriarch down to the
lowest monk, were forbidden, under the
penalties of high treason, to make public
or even to receive any paper whatever
from the Vatican ; additional guards were
placed at the city gates, with orders to
search every wandering friar or other
suspicious person who might, by any
possibility, bring in a forbidden missive ;
1 For Sarpi's advice to the Doge, see Bi-
anchi Giovini, vol. i. pp. 216, et seq. The doc-
ument is given fully in the Lettere di F. P. S.,
Firenze, 1863, vol. i. pp. 17, et seq. ; also in
Machi, Storia del Consiglio dei Dieci, cap.
xxiv., where the bull of excommunication is
also given.
a special patrol was kept, night and day,
to prevent any posting of the forbidden
notices on walls or houses ; any person
receiving or finding one was to take it
immediately to the authorities, under the
severest penalties, and any person found
concealing such documents was to be pun-
ished by death.
At first some of the clergy were re-
fractory. The head of the whole church
establishment of Venice, the Patriarch
himself, gave signs of resistance ; but the
Senate at once silenced him. Sundry
other bishops and high ecclesiastics made
a show of opposition ; and they were
placed in confinement. One of them
seeming reluctant to conduct the usual
church service, the Senate sent an exe-
cutioner to erect a gibbet before his door.
Another, having asked that he be al-
lowed to await some intimation from the
Holy Spirit, received answer that the
Senate had already received directions
from the Holy Spirit to hang any person
resisting their decree. The three reli-
gious orders which had showed most op-
position — Jesuits, Theatins, and Capu-
chins — were in a semi-polite manner
virtually expelled from the Republic.2
Not the least curious among the re-
sults of this state of things was the war
of pamphlets. From Rome, Bologna, and
other centres of thought, even from Paris
and Frankfort, polemic tractates rained
upon the Republic. The vast majority
of their authors were on the side of the
Vatican, and of this majority the leaders
were the two cardinals so eminent in
learning and logic, Bellarmine and Ba-
ronius ; but, single-handed, Sarpi was, by
general consent, a match for the whole
opposing force.8
Of all the weapons then used, the
2 For interesting details regarding the de-
parture of the Jesuits, see Cornet, Paolo V. e
la Republica Veneta, pp. 277-279.
3 In the library of Cornell University are
no less than nine quartos filled with selected
examples of these polemics on both sides.
Fra Paolo Sarpi.
53
most effective throughout Europe was
the solemn protest drawn by Sarpi and
issued by the Doge. It was addressed
nominally to the Venetian ecclesiastics,
but really to Christendom, and both as to
matter and manner it was Father Paul
at his best. It was weighty, lucid, pun-
gent, and deeply in earnest, — in every
part asserting fidelity to the Church and
loyalty to the papacy, but setting com-
pletely at naught the main claim of Pope
Paul : the Doge solemnly declaring him-
self " a prince who, in temporal matters,
recognizes no superior save the Divine
Majesty."
The victory of the friar soon began to
be recognized far and near. Men called
him by the name afterward so generally
given him, — the " terribile frate." The
Vatican seemed paralyzed. None of its
measures availed, and it was hurt, rather
than helped, by its efforts to pester and
annoy Venice at various capitals. At
Rome, it burned Father Paul's books and
declared him excommunicated ; it even
sought to punish his printer by putting
into the Index not only all works that he
had ever printed, but all that he might
ever print. At Vienna, the papal Nuncio
thought to score a point by declaring that
he would not attend a certain religious
function in case the Venetian Ambassa-
dor should appear ; whereupon the Vene-
tian announced that he had taken physic
and regretted that he could not be pre-
sent, — whereat all Europe laughed.
Judicious friends in various European
cabinets now urged both parties to re-
cede or to compromise. France and Spain
both proffered their good offices. The
offer of France was finally accepted,
and the French Ambassador was kept
running between the Ducal Palace and
the Vatican until people began laughing
at him also. The emissaries of His Holi-
ness begged hard that, at least, appear-
ances might be saved ; that the Republic
would undo some of its measures before
the interdict was removed, or at least
would seem to do so, and especially that
it would withdraw its refusals before the
Pope withdrew his penalties. All in vain.
The Venetians insisted that they had
committed no crime and had nothing to
retract. The Vatican then urged that the
Senate should consent to receive absolu-
tion for its resistance to the Pope's au-
thority. This the Senate steadily refused ;
it insisted, " Let His Holiness put things
as before, and we will put things as be-
fore ; as to his absolution, we do not need
it or want it ; to receive it would be to
acknowledge that we have been in the
wrong." Even the last poor sop of all
was refused : the Senate would have no
great " function " to celebrate the termi-
nation of the interdict ; they would not
even go to the mass which Cardinal Joy-
euse celebrated on that occasion. The
only appearance of concession which the
Republic made was to give up the two ec-
clesiastics to the French Ambassador as
a matter of courtesy to the French king ;
and when this was done, the Ambassador
delivered them to the Pope ; but Venice
especially reserved all the rights she had
exercised. All the essential demands of
the papacy were refused, and thus was
forever ended the papal power of lay-
ing an interdict upon a city or a people.
From that incubus, Christendom, thanks
to Father Paul and to Venice, was at last
and forever free.
The Vatican did, indeed, try hard to
keep its old claim in being. A few years
after its defeat by Fra Paolo, it endea-
vored to reassert in Spain the same au-
thority which had been so humbly ac-
knowledged there a few years before.
It was doubtless felt that this most pious
of all countries, which had previously
been so docile, and which had stood
steadily by the Vatican against Venice
in the recent struggle, would again set
an example of submission. Never was
there a greater mistake : the Vatican re-
ceived from Spanish piety a humiliating
refusal.
Next it tried the old weapons against
the little government at Turin. For
54
The Scab.
many generations the House of Savoy
had been dutifully submissive to religious
control ; nowhere out of Spain had here-
sy been treated more cruelly ; yet here,
too, the Vatican claim was spurned. But
the final humiliation took place some
years later under Urban VIII., — the
same pontiff who wrecked papal infalli-
bility on Galileo's telescope. He tried
to enforce his will on the state of Lucca,
which, in the days of Pope Paul, had sub-
mitted to the Vatican decrees abjectly ;
but that little republic now seized the
weapons which Sarpi had devised, and
drove the papal forces out of the field :
the papal excommunication was, even by
this petty government, annulled in Vene-
tian fashion and even less respectfully.1
Thus the world learned how weak the
Vatican hold had become. Even Pope
Paul learned it, and, from being the
most strenuous of modern pontiffs, he
became one of the most moderate in
everything save in the enrichment of his
family. Thus ended the last serious
effort to coerce a people by an interdict,
and so, one might suppose, would end the
work of Father Paul. Not so. There
was to come a second chapter in his bio-
graphy, more instructive, perhaps, than
the first, — a chapter which has lasted
until our own day.
A. D. White.
THE SCAB.
[Although the author of this paper has been chiefly known to the readers of the ATLANTIC as
a writer of stories of the Klondike, he has given many years to the study of social problems.
The People of the Abyss is one of his latest productions in this field. The present article is an
interesting contribution, from a radical point of view, to the ATLANTIC'S series of papers on the
Ethics of Business. It is to be followed in February by an article, Is Commercialism in Dis-
grace ? by John Graham Brooks. — THE EDITORS.]
IN a competitive society, where men hours. To hold his place (which is to
struggle with one another for food and
shelter, what is more natural than that
generosity, when it diminishes the food
and shelter of men other than he who
is generous, should be held an accursed
thing ? Wise old saws to the contrary,
he who takes from a man's purse takes
from his existence. To strike at a man's
food and shelter is to strike at his life,
and in a society organized on a tooth-
and-nail basis, such an act, performed
though it may be under the guise of
generosity, is none the less menacing
and terrible.
It is for this reason that a laborer is
so fiercely hostile to another laborer who
offers to work for less pay or longer
1 The proofs — and from Catholic sources —
that it was the Pope who condemned Galileo's
doctrine of the earth's movement about the
sun, and not merely the Congregation of the
live), he must offset this offer by another
equally liberal, which is equivalent to
giving away somewhat from the food
and shelter he enjoys. To sell his day's
work for two dollars instead of two dol-
lars and a half means that he, his wife,
and his children will not have so good a
roof over their heads, such warm clothes
on their backs, such substantial food in
their stomachs. Meat will be bought
less frequently, and it will be tougher
and less nutritious ; stout new shoes will
go less often on the children's feet ; and
disease and death will be more imminent
in a cheaper house and neighborhood.
Thus, the generous laborer, giving
more of a day's work for less return
Index, the present writer has given in his
History of the Warfare of Science with The-
ology, vol. i. chap. iii.
The Scab.
55
(measured in terms of food and shelter),
threatens the life of his less generous
brother laborer, and, at the best, if he
does not destroy that life, he diminishes
it. Whereupon the less generous laborer
looks upon him as an enemy, and, as
men are inclined to do in a tooth-and-
nail society, he tries to kill the man who
is trying to kill him.
When a striker kills with a brick the
man who has taken his place, he has no
sense of wrong-doing. In the deepest
holds of his being, though he does not
reason the impulse, he has an ethical
sanction. He feels dimly that he has
justification, just as the home-defending
Boer felt, though more sharply, with
each bullet he fired at the invading Eng-
lish. Behind every brick thrown by a
striker is the selfish " will to live " of
himself and the slightly altruistic will
to live of his family. The family-group
came into the world before the state-
group, and society being still on the
primitive basis of tooth and nail, the
will to live of the state is not so com-
pelling to the striker as the will to live
of his family and himself.
In addition to the use of bricks, clubs,
and bullets, the selfish laborer finds it
necessary to express his feelings in
speech. Just as the peaceful country-
dweller calls the sea-rover a " pirate,"
and the stout burgher calls the man who
breaks into his strong-box a " robber,"
so the selfish laborer applies the oppro-
brious epithet " scab " to the laborer who
takes from him food and shelter by being
more generous in the disposal of his la-
bor-power. The sentimental connotation
of scab is as terrific as that of " trai-
tor " or " Judas," and a sentimental de-
finition would be as deep and varied as
the human heart. It is far easier to ar-
rive at what may be called a technical
definition, worded in commercial terms,
as, for instance, that a scab is one who
gives more value for the same price
than another,
The laborer who gives more time, or
strength, or skill, for the same wage, than
another, or equal time, or strength, or
skill, for a less wage, is a scab. This
generousness on his part is hurtful to his
fellow laborers, for it compels them to
an equal generousness which is not to
their liking, and which gives them less
of food and shelter. But a word may
be said for the scab. Just as his act
makes his rivals compulsorily generous,
so do they, by fortune of birth and train-
ing, make compulsory his act of gener-
ousuess. He does not scab because he
wants to scab. No whim of the spirit,
no burgeoning of the heart, leads him to
give more of his labor-power than they
for a certain sum.
It is because he cannot get work on
the same terms as they that he is a scab.
There is less work than there are men
to do work. This is patent, else the scab
would not loom so large on the labor-
market horizon. Because they are
stronger than he, or more skilled, or more
fortunate, or more energetic, it is impos-
sible for him to take their places at the
same wage. To take their places he
must give more value, must work longer
hours, or receive a smaller wage. He
does so, and he cannot help it, for his
will to live is driving him on as well
as they are being driven on by theirs,
and to live he must win food and shelter,
which he can do only by receiving per-
mission to work from some man who
owns a bit of land or piece of machinery.
And to receive permission from this man,
he must make the transaction profitable
for him.
Viewed in this light, the scab who
gives more labor-power for a certain
price than his fellows is not so generous
after all. He is no more generous with
his energy than the chattel slave and the
convict laborer, who, by the way, are
the almost perfect scabs. They give
their labor-power for about the minimum
possible price. But, within limits, they
may loaf and malinger, and, as scabs,
are exceeded by the machine, which
56
The Scab.
never loafs and malingers, and which is
the ideally perfect scab.
It is not nice to be a scab. Not only is it
not in good social taste and comradeship,
but, from the standpoint of food and
shelter, it is bad business policy. No-
body desires to scab, to give most for
least. The ambition of every individual
is quite the opposite, — to give least for
most ; and as a result, living in a tooth-
and-nail society, battle royal is waged
by the ambitious individuals. But in its
most salient aspect, that of the struggle
over the division of a joint-product, it is
no longer a battle between individuals,
but between groups of individuals. Cap-
ital and labor apply themselves to raw
material, make something useful out of
it, add to its value, and then proceed to
quarrel over the division of the added
value. Neither cares to give most for
least. Each is intent on giving less than
the other and on receiving more.
Labor combines into its unions ; capi-
tal into partnerships, associations, cor-
porations, and trusts. A group-struggle
is the result, in which the individuals, as
individuals, play no part. The Brother-
hood of Carpenters and Joiners, for in-
stance, serves notice on the Master Build-
ers' Association that it demands an in-
crease of the wage of its members from
$3.50 a day to $4.00, and a Saturday
half-holiday without pay. This means
that the carpenters are trying to give less
for more. Where they received $21.00
for six full days, they are endeavoring to
get $22.00 for five days and a half, —
that is, they will work half a day less
each week and receive a dollar more.
Also, they expect the Saturday half-
holiday to give work to one additional
man for each eleven previously employed.
This last affords a splendid example of
the development of the group idea. In
this particular struggle the individual
has no chance at all for life. The indi-
vidual carpenter would be crushed like
a mote by the Master Builders' Associa-
tion, and like a mote the individual mas-
ter builder would be crushed by the
Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners.
In the group-struggle over the division
of the joint-product, labor utilizes the
union with its two great weapons, — the
strike and boycott ; while capital utilizes
the trust and the association, the weapons
of which are the blacklist, the lockout,
and the scab. The scab is by far the
most formidable weapon of the three.
He is the man who breaks strikes and
causes all the trouble. Without him
there would be no trouble, for the strik-
ers are willing to remain out peacefully
and indefinitely so long as other men
are not in their places, and so long as
the particular aggregation of capital with
which they are fighting is eating its head
off in enforced idleness.
But both warring groups have reserve
weapons up their sleeves. Were it not
for the scab, these weapons would not be
brought into play. But the scab takes
the places of the strikers, who begin at
once to wield a most powerful weapon, —
terrorism. The will to live of the scab
recoils from the menace of broken bones
and violent death. With all due re-
spect to the labor leaders, who are not
to be blamed for volubly asseverating
otherwise, terrorism is a well-defined and
eminently successful policy of the labor
unions. It has probably won them more
strikes than all the rest of the weapons
in their arsenal. This terrorism, how-
ever, must be clearly understood. It is
directed solely against the scab, placing
him in such fear for life and limb as to
drive him out of the contest. But when
terrorism gets out of hand and inoffensive
non-combatants are injured, law and
order threatened, and property destroyed,
it becomes an edged tool that cuts both
ways. This sort of terrorism is sincerely
deplored by the labor leaders, for it has
probably lost them as many strikes as
have been lost by any other single cause.
The scab is powerless under terrorism.
As a rule he is not so good or gritty a
man as the men he is displacing, and he
The Scab.
57
lacks their fighting organization. He
stands in dire need of stiffening and
backing. His employers, the capitalists,
draw their two remaining weapons, the
ownership of which is debatable, but
which they for the time being happen to
control. These two weapons may be
called the political and judicial machin-
ery of society. When the scab crumples
up and is ready to go down before the
fists, bricks, and bullets of the labor-group,
the capitalist-group puts the police and
soldiers into the field, and begins a gen-
eral bombardment of injunctions. Vic-
tory usually follows, for the labor-group
cannot withstand the combined assault of
gatling guns and injunctions.
But it has been noted that the owner-
ship of the political and judicial machin-
ery of society is debatable. In the Ti-
tanic struggle over the division of the
joint-product, each group reaches out for
every available weapon. Nor are they
blinded by the smoke of conflict. They
fight their battles as coolly and collected-
ly as ever battles were fought on paper.
The capitalist-group has long since real-
ized the immense importance of con-
trolling the political and judicial machin-
ery of society. Taught by gatlings and
injunctions, which have smashed many
an otherwise successful strike, the labor-
group is beginning to realize that it all de-
pends upon who is behind and who is be-
fore those weapons. And he who knows
the labor-movement knows that there is
slowly growing up and being formulated
a clear, definite policy for the capture of
the political and judicial machinery.
This is the terrible spectre which Mr.
John Graham Brooks sees looming por-
tentously over the twentieth - century
world. No man may boast a more intimate
knowledge of the labor-movement than
he, and he reiterates again and again the
dangerous likelihood of the whole labor-
group capturing the political machinery
of society. As he says in his recent book: l
1 The Social Unrest. New York : The Mac-
millan Co. 1903.
" It is not probable that employers can
destroy unionism in the United States.
Adroit and desperate attempts will, how-
ever, be made, if we mean by unionism
the undisciplined and aggressive fact of
vigorous and determined organizations.
If capital should prove too strong in this
struggle, the result is easy to predict.
The employers have only to convince
organized labor that it cannot hold its
own against the capitalist manager, and
the whole energy that now goes to the
union will turn to an aggressive political
socialism. It will not be the harmless
sympathy with increased city and state
functions which trade unions already
feel ; it will become a turbulent political
force bent upon using every weapon of
taxation against the rich."
This struggle not to be a scab, to avoid
giving more for less, and to succeed in
giving less for more, is more vital than
it would appear on the surface. The
capitalist and labor groups are locked to-
gether in desperate battle, and neither
side is swayed by moral considerations
more than skin-deep. The labor-group
hires business agents, lawyers, and or-
ganizers ; and is beginning to intimidate
legislators by the strength of its solid
vote, and more directly, in the near
future, it will attempt to control legisla-
tion by capturing it bodily through the
ballot-box. On the other hand, the cap-
italist-group, numerically weaker, hires
newspapers, universities, and legisla-
tures, and strives to bend to its need all
the forces which go to mould public
opinion.
The only honest morality displayed by
either side is white-hot indignation at
the iniquities of the other side. The
striking teamster complacently takes a
scab driver into an alley and with an iron
bar breaks his arms so that he can drive
no more, but cries out to high heaven
for justice when the capitalist breaks his
skull by means of a club in the hands of
a policeman. Nay, the members of a
union will declaim in impassioned rhet-
58
The Scab.
oric for the God-given right of an eight-
hour day, and at the time be working
their own business agent seventeen hours
out of the twenty-four.
A capitalist, such as the late Collis P.
Huntington, and his name is Legion, af-
ter a long life spent in buying the aid of
countless legislatures, will wax virtuous-
ly wrathful and condemn in unmeasured
terms " the dangerous tendency of cry-
ing out to the government for aid " in
the way of labor legislation. Without a
quiver, a member of the capitalist-group
will run tens of thousands of pitiful child-
laborers through his life-destroying cot-
ton factories, and weep maudlin and
Constitutional tears over one scab hit in
the back with a brick. He will drive
a " compulsory " free contract with an
unorganized laborer on the basis of a
starvation wage, saying, " Take it or
leave it," knowing that to leave it means
to die of hunger ; and in the next breath,
when the organizer entices that laborer
into a union, will storm patriotically
about the inalienable rights of all men
to work. In short, the chief moral con-
cern of either side is with the morals of
the other side. They are not in the busi-
ness for their moral welfare, but to
achieve the enviable position of the non-
scab who gets more than he gives.
But there is more to the question than
has yet been discussed. The labor scab
is no more detestable to his brother
laborers than is the capitalist scab to his
brother capitalists. A capitalist may
get most for least in dealing with his
laborers, and in so far be a non-scab ; but
at the same time, in his dealings with his
fellow capitalists, he may give most for
least and be the very worst kind of scab.
The most heinous crime an employer
of labor can commit is to scab on his
fellow employers of labor. Just as the
individual laborers have organized into
groups to protect themselves from the
peril of the scab laborer, so have the em-
ployers organized into groups to protect
themselves from the peril of the scab
employer. The employers' federations,
associations, and trusts are nothing more
or less than unions. They are organized
to destroy scabbing amongst themselves
and to encourage scabbing amongst
others. For this reason they pool inter-
ests, determine prices, and present an
unbroken and aggressive front to the
labor-group.
As has been said before, nobody likes
to play the compulsorily generous role
of scab. It is a bad business proposition
on the face of it. And it is patent that
there would be no capitalist scabs if there
were not more capital than there is work
for capital to do. When there are enough
factories in existence to supply, with oc-
casional stoppages, a certain commodity,
the building of new factoi-ies, by a rival
concern, for the production of that com-
modity, is plain advertisement that that
capital is out of a job. The first act of
this new aggregation of capital will be to
cut prices, to give more for less ; in short,
to scab, to strike at the very existence of
the less generous aggregation of capital,
the work of which it is trying to do.
No scab capitalist strives to give more
for less for any other reason than that he
hopes, by undercutting a competitor and
driving that competitor out of the mar-
ket, to get that market and its profits for
himself. His ambition is to achieve the
day when he shall stand alone in the field
both as buyer and seller, when he will
be the royal non-scab, buying most for
least, selling least for most, and reducing
all about him, the small buyers and sell-
ers (the consumers and the laborers), to
a general condition of scabdom. This,
for example, has been the history of Mr.
Rockefeller and the Standard Oil Com-
pany. Through all the sordid economies
of scabdom he has passed until to-day he
is a most regal non-scab. However, to
continue in this enviable position, he
must be prepared at a moment's notice
to go scabbing again. And he is pre-
pared. Whenever a competitor arises,
Mr. Rockefeller changes about from giv-
The Scab.
59
ing least for most, and gives most for
least with such a vengeance as to drive
the competitor out of existence.
The banded capitalists discriminate
against a scab capitalist by refusing him
trade advantages, and by combining
against him in most relentless fashion.
The banded laborers, discriminating
against a scab laborer in more primitive
fashion, with a club, are no more merci-
less than the banded capitalists.
Mr. Casson tells of a New York capi-
talist, who withdrew from the Sugar
Union several years ago and became a
scab. He was worth something like
twenty millions of dollars. But the
Sugar Union, standing shoulder to
shoulder with the Railroad Union and
several others, beat him to his knees till
he cried enough. So frightfully did they
beat him that he was obliged to turn over
to his creditors his home, his chickens,
and his gold watch. In point of fact, he
was as thoroughly bludgeoned by the
Federatio.u of Capitalist Unions as ever
scab workman was bludgeoned by a labor
union. The intent in either case is the
same, to destroy the scab's producing
power. The labor scab with concussion
of the brain is put out of business, and
so is the capitalist scab who has lost all
his dollars down to his chickens and his
watch.
But the role of scab passes beyond the
individual. Just as individuals scab on
other individuals, so do groups scab on
other groups. And the principle in-
volved is precisely the same as in the
case of the simple labor scab. A group,
in the nature of its organization, is often
compelled to give most for least, and, so
doing, to strike at the life of another
group. At the present moment all Eu-
rope is appalled by that colossal scab,
the United States. And Europe is clam-
orous with agitation for a Federation of
National Unions to protect her from the
United States. It may be noted, in
passing, that in its prime essentials this
agitation in no wise differs from the
trade union agitation among workmen in
any industry. The trouble is caused by
the scab who is giving most for least.
The result of the American Scab's ne-
farious actions will be to strike at the
food and shelter of Europe. The way
for Europe to protect herself is to quit
bickering among her parts and to form
a union against the Scab. And if the
union is formed, armies and navies may
be expected to be brought into play in
fashion similar to the bricks and clubs
in ordinary labor struggles.
In this connection, and as one of
many walking delegates for the nations,
M. Leroy-Beaulieu, the noted French
economist, may well be quoted. In a
letter to the Vienna Tageblatt, he advo-
cates an economic alliance among the
Continental nations for the purpose of
barring out American goods, an economic
alliance, in his own language, " which
may possibly and desirably develop into
a political alliance"
It will be noted in the utterances of
the Continental walking delegates that,
one and all, they leave England out of
the proposed union. And in England
herself the feeling is growing 'that her
days are numbered if she cannot unite
for offense and defense with the great
American Scab. As Andrew Carnegie
said some time ago, " The only course
for Great Britain seems to be reunion
with her grandchild, or sure decline to a
secondary place, and then to comparative
insignificance in the future annals of the
English-speaking race."
Cecil Rhodes, speaking of what would
have obtained but for the pig-headedness
of George III., and of what will obtain
when England and the United States are
united, said, " No cannon would . . .
be fired on either hemisphere but by
permission of the English race." It
would seem that England, fronted by
the hostile Continental Union and flanked
by the great American Scab, has nothing
left but to join with the Scab and play the
historic labor-role of armed Pinkerton.
60
The Scab.
Granting the words of Cecil Rhodes, the
United States would be enabled to scab
without let or hindrance on Europe, while
England, as professional strike-breaker
and policeman, destroyed the unions and
kept order.
All this may appear fantastic and
erroneous, but there is in it a soul of
truth vastly more significant than it may
seem. Civilization may be expressed
to-day in terms of trade unionism. In-
dividual struggles have largely passed
away, but group struggles increase pro-
digiously. And the things for which
the groups struggle are the same as of
old. Shorn of all subtleties and com-
plexities, the chief struggle of men, and
of groups of men, is for food and shelter.
And, as of old they struggled with tooth
and nail, so to-day they struggle, with
teeth and nails elongated into armies
and navies, machines, and economic
advantages.
Under the definition that a scab is
one who gives more value for the same
price than another, it would seem that
society can be generally divided into the
two classes of the scabs and the non-
scabs. But on closer investigation, how-
ever, it will be seen that the non-scab is
almost a vanishing quantity. In the
social jungle everybody is preying upon
everybody else. As in the case of Mr.
Rockefeller, he who was a scab yester-
day is a non-scab to-day, and to-morrow
may be a scab again.
The woman stenographer or book-
keeper who receives forty dollars per
month where a man was receiving
seventy-five is a scab. So is the woman
who does a man's work at a weaving
machine, and the child who goes into the
mill or factory. And the father, who is
scabbed out of work by the wives and
children of other men, sends his own
wife and children to scab in order to
save himself.
When a publisher offers an author
better royalties than other publishers
have been paying him, he is scabbing
on those other publishers. The reporter
on a newspaper who feels he should be
receiving a larger salary for his work,
says so, and is shown the door, is re-
placed by a reporter who is a scab ;
whereupon, when the belly-need presses,
the displaced reporter goes to another
paper and scabs himself. The minister
who hardens his heart to a call, and waits
for a certain congregation to offer him
say five hundred a year more, often
finds himself scabbed upon by another
and more impecunious minister ; and the
next time it is his turn to scab while a
brother minister is hardening his heart
to a call. The scab is everywhere. The
professional strike-breakers, who, as a
class, receive large wages, will scab on
one another, while scab unions are even
formed to prevent scabbing upon scabs.
There are non-scabs, but they are
usually born so, and are protected by the
whole might of society in the possession
of their food and shelter. King Edward
is such a type, as are all individuals
who receive hereditary food-and-shelter
privileges, such as the present Duke of
Bedford, for instance, who yearly re-
ceives $75,000 from the good people of
London because some former king gave
some former ancestor of his the market
privileges of Covent Garden. The irre-
sponsible rich are likewise non-scabs, and
by them is meant that coupon-clipping
class which hires its managers and brains
to invest the money usually left it by its
ancestors.
Outside these lucky creatures, all the
rest, at one time or another in their lives,
are scabs, at one time or another are en-
gaged in giving more for a certain price
than any one else. The meek professor
in some endowed institution, by his meek
suppression of his convictions, is giving
more for his salary than the other more
outspoken professor gave, whose chair
he occupies. And when a political party
dangles a full dinner-pail in the eyes of
the toiling masses, it is offering more for
a vote than the dubious dollar of the op-
The Scab.
61
posing party. Even a money-lender is
not above taking a slightly lower rate of
interest and saying nothing about it.
Such is the tangle of conflicting inter-
ests in a tooth-and-nail society that peo-
ple cannot avoid being scabs, are often
made so against their desires, and un-
consciously. When several trades in a
certain locality demand and receive an
advance in wages, they are unwittingly
making scabs of their fellow laborers in
that district who have received no advance
in wages. In San Francisco the bar-
bers, laundry workers, and milk-wagon
drivers received such an advance in
wages. Their employers promptly add-
ed the amount of this advance to the
selling price of their wares. The price
of shaves, of washing, and of milk went
up. This reduced the purchasing power
of the unorganized laborers, and, in point
of fact, reduced their wages and made
them greater scabs.
Because the British laborer is disin-
clined to scab, that is, because he restricts
his output in order to give less for the
wage he receives, it is to a certain extent
made possible for the American capital-
ist, who receives a less restricted output
from his laborers, to play the scab on the
English capitalist. As a result of this
(of course, combined with other causes),
the American capitalist and the Ameri-
can laborer are striking at the food and
shelter of the English capitalist and la-
borer.
The English laborer is starving to-day
because, among other things, he is not a
scab. He practices the policy of " Ca'
Canny," which may be defined as "go
easy." In order to get most for least, in
many trades he performs but from one
fourth to one sixth of the labor he is well
able to perform. An instance of this is
found in the building of the Westing-
house Electric Works at Manchester.
The British limit per man was 400 bricks
per day. The Westinghouse Company
imported a " driving " American con-
tractor aided by half-a-dozen " driving "
American foremen, and the British brick-
layer swiftly attained an average of 1800
bricks per day, with a maximum of 2500
bricks for the plainest work.
But the British laborer's policy of
Ca' Canny, which is the very honor-
able one of giving least for most, and
which is likewise the policy of the Eng-
lish capitalist, is nevertheless frowned
upon by the English capitalist whose
business existence is threatened by the
great American Scab. From the rise of
the factory system, the English capitalist
gladly embraced the opportunity, wher-
ever he found it, of giving least for most.
He did it all over the world wherever he
enjoyed a market monopoly, and he did
it at home, with the laborers employed
in his mills, destroying them like flies till
prevented, within limits, by the passage
of the Factory Acts. Some of the proud-
est fortunes of England to-day may trace
their origin to the giving of least for
most to the miserable slaves of the fac-
tory towns. But at the present time
the English capitalist is outraged because
his laborers are employing against him
precisely the same policy he employed
against them, and which he would em-
ploy again did the chance present itself.
Yet Ca' Canny is a disastrous thing
to the British laborer. It has driven
ship-building from England to Scotland,
bottle-making from Scotland to Belgium,
flint-glass-making from England to Ger-
many, and to-day it is steadily driving
industry after industry to other coun-
tries. A correspondent from Northamp-
ton wrote not long ago: "Factories are
working half and third time. . . . There
is no strike, there is no real labor trouble,
but the masters and men are alike suf-
fering from sheer lack of employment.
Markets which were once theirs are now
American." It would seem that the un-
fortunate British laborer is 'twixt the
devil and the deep sea. If he gives most
for least, he faces a frightful slavery such
as marked the beginning of the factory
system. If he gives least for most, he
62
The Scab.
drives industry away to other countries,
and has no work at all.
But the union laborers of the United
States have nothing to boast of, while,
according to their trade-union ethics, they
have a great deal of which to be ashamed.
They passionately preach short hours and
big wages, the shorter the hours and the
bigger the wages the better. Their ha-
tred for a scab is as terrible as the hatred
of a patriot for a traitor, of a Christian
for a Judas. And in the face of all this
they are as colossal scabs as the United
States is a colossal scab. For all of their
boasted unions and high labor-ideals, they
are about the most thorough-going scabs
on the planet.
Receiving $4.50 per day, because of
his proficiency and immense working
power, the American laborer has been
known to scab upon scabs (so called) who
took his place and received only $.90 per
day for a longer day. In this particular
instance, five Chinese coolies., working
longer hours, gave less value for the price
received from their employer than did
one American laborer.
It is upon his brother laborers over-
seas that the American laborer most out-
rageously scabs. As Mr. Casson has
shown, an English nailmaker gets $3.00
per week, while an American nailmaker
gets $30.00. But the English worker
turns out 200 pounds of nails per week,
while the American turns out 5500
pounds. If he were as " fair " as his
English brother, other things being equal,
he would be receiving, at the English
worker's rate of pay, $82.50. As it is,
he is scabbing upon his English brother
to the tune of $79.50 per week. Dr.
Schultze-Gaevernitz has shown that a
German weaver produces 466 yards of
cotton a week at a cost of .303 per yard,
while an American weaver produces 1200
yards at a cost of .02 per yard.
But, it may be objected, a great part
of this is due to the more improved
American machinery. Very true ; but,
none the less, a great part is still due to
the superior energy, skill, and willing-
ness of the American laborer. The Eng-
lish laborer is faithful to the policy of
Ca' Canny. He refuses point blank to
get the work out of a machine that the
New World scab gets out of a machine.
Mr. Maxim, observing a wasteful hand-
labor process in his English factory,
invented a machine which he proved
capable of displacing several men. But
workman after workman was put at the
machine, and without exception they
turned out neither more nor less than
a workman turned out by hand. They
obeyed the mandate of the union and
went easy, while Mr. Maxim gave up in
despair. Nor will the British workman
run machines at as high speed as the
American, nor will he run so many. An
American workman will " give equal at-
tention simultaneously to three, four, or
six machines or tools, while the British
workman is compelled by his trade union
to limit his attention to one, so that em-
ployment may be given to half-a-dozen
men."
But to scabbing, no blame attaches it-
self anywhere. All the world is a scab,
and, with rare exceptions, all the people
in it are scabs. The strong, capable
workman gets a job and holds it because
of his strength and capacity. And he
holds it because out of his strength and
capacity he gives a better value for his
wage than does the weaker and less ca-
pable workman. Therefore he is scab-
bing upon his weaker and less capable
brother workman. This is incontrover-
tible. He is giving more value for the
price paid by the employer.
The superior workman scabs upon the
inferior workman because he is so con-
stituted and cannot help it. The one, by
fortune of birth and upbringing, is strong
and capable ; the other, by fortune of
birth and upbringing, is not so strong or
capable. It is for the same reason that
one country scabs upon another. That
country which has the good fortune to
possess great natural resources, a finer
Morley's Gladstone.
63
sun and soil, unhampering institutions,
and a deft and intelligent labor class and
capitalist class, is bound to scab upon a
country less fortunately situated. It is
the good fortune of the United States
that is making her the colossal scab, just
as it is the good fortune of one man to
be born with a straight back while his
brother is born witli a hump.
It is not good to give most for least,
not good to be a scab. The word has
gained universal opprobrium. On the
other hand, to be a non-scab, to give
least for most, is universally branded as
stingy, selfish, and unchristian-like. So
all the world, like the British workman,
is 'twixt the devil and the deep sea. It
is treason to one's fellows to scab, it is
treason to God and unchristian-like not
to scab.
Since to give least for most and to
give most for least are universally bad,
what remains ? Equity remains, which
is to give like for like, the same for the
same, neither more nor less. But this
equity, society, as at present constituted,
cannot give. It is not in the nature of
present-day society for men to give like
for like, the same for the same. And as
long as men continue to live in this com-
petitive society, struggling tooth and nail
with one another for food and shelter,
(which is to struggle tooth and nail with
one another for life), that long will the
scab continue to exist. His will to live
will force him to exist. He may be flout-
ed and jeered by his brothers, he may be
beaten with bricks and clubs by the men
who by superior strength and capacity
scab upon him as he scabs upon them
by longer hours and smaller wages, but
through it all he will persist, going them
one better, and giving a bit more of most
for least than they are giving.
Jack London.
MORLEY'S GLADSTONE.
MOOBE records in his Diary a break-
fast at Jeffrey's where Sydney Smith
spoke of Sir T. Lawrence having bled
to death owing to the ignorance of a ser-
vant in not properly adjusting the band-
age : " On my remarking the additional
ill luck, after such a death, of falling into
the hands of such a biographer as Camp-
bell, he started up and exclaimed theat-
rically, ' Look to your bandages, all ye
that have been blooded ; there are bio-
graphers abroad ! ' '
The modern biographer abroad, to say
nothing of his lack of skill in dressing
wounds, has torn open so many that one
commonly experiences a certain involun-
tary trepidation on taking up a new Life.
Nor does the fact that the biography is
official necessarily relieve the apprehen-
sion. " Literary executors," said Cole-
ridge, " make sad work in general with
their testators' brains." This was prob-
ably not a direct prophecy of Froude or
Purcell. Even before their day, which
Coleridge would have distinctly not re-
joiced to see, lives had been taken under
the guise of being written. That literary
tragedy, however, no man need have
feared to see repeated in John Morley's
biography of Gladstone.1 It was certain
in advance that nothing but poised judg-
ment, measured estimate, and perfect
taste, with fair though pungent phrase
and characterization, should we get from
the biographer of Cromwell and Cobden,
the interpreter of Diderot and Voltaire
and Rousseau, of Walpole and of Burke,
and, latterly, the political orator whom
the best of England hear gladly. His
1 The Life, of William Ewart Gladstone.
By JOHN MORLEY. In three volumes. New
York: The Macmillan Co. 1903.
64
Morley's Gladstone.
old chief never gave a better proof that,
contrary to the general opinion, he was
a good judge of men than in the choice
of a literary executor. The appeal to
Mr. Morley's discretion, to speak for the
moment of that quality alone, was of the
slightest from the transparent openness
of Gladstone's manner of life. " No-
body ever had fewer secrets." There
were no pathological passages in his
letters or journals of which to make a
public clinic. Even the asterisks de-
noting omitted sentences in his corre-
spondence, as printed, hide, Mr. Morley
assures us, " no piquant hit, no person-
ality, no indiscretion." There will be
no place, then, for the future digger- up
of the original manuscripts, on scandal
bent. We have before us the " real "
Gladstone, without that abused word at
all possessing its now customary conno-
tation of something derogatory or repel-
lent.
One formidable difficulty obviously
confronted Mr. Morley from the start.
How was the biographer to disentangle
the hero from the history of his time, of
which he was so great a part ? The life
could not be made intelligible apart from
its political setting ; on the other hand,
to make the latter stand out full and
clear would be to run the risk of throw-
ing the man himself too much into the
shadow. It cannot be said that the
bulky volumes wholly escape the double
peril. It would be unfair to apply to
them what has been said of Professor
Masson's Life and Times of Milton, —
that the Times are to the Life as nine to
one ; yet there is an undeniable impres-
sion, now and then, in this work of Mr.
Morley's, of the historian getting the bet-
ter of the biographer. Even contem-
porary events in which Gladstone had
but a minor r<5le — such as the Franco-
German war — are narrated in a way to
come near falling between two stools.
The history is scamped, the biography
overweighted. In the case of such themes
as Ireland, the Transvaal, Egypt, the
struggle for Italian unity, the rescue of
the bleeding provinces from the Turk,
we may well admit the demand for full
handling, since with them Gladstone had
a militant and fiercely debated connec-
tion. Indeed, there is one theory of the
function which Mr. Morley may have
defined to himself that would justify all
his historical longueurs. It is possible
that he designed his great work, not pre-
cisely as a " huge Whig tract " of the
Macaulay order, but as a conscious con-
tribution to the propaganda of Liberal-
ism, — using that word in no party sense,
but as signifying the movement to en-
franchise the spirit of mankind. The
careful translation of all the citations
from Greek, Latin, and even French and
Italian, would look as if his volumes were
sent out in the hope of being understand-
ed of the common people. Their sale by
popular subscription in England points
the same way. If the actual aim were
to make all plain to short memories and
meagre reading, there is constructive ex-
cuse for pages which would otherwise be
voted both superfluous and tedious.
Thirty years ago, John Morley as the
biographer of William Ewart Gladstone
would have seemed the most palpable
misfit. Even to-day, many have had
grave doubt on one point. Would not
the Life reveal much less than perfect
sympathy between writer and subject
on the religious side ? How could an
avowed agnostic, though of the most
grave and weighty cast of mind, possibly
hope to portray the ardent theologian,
the convinced Churchman, the devout
Christian believer, who, as Dean Church
said of his personal knowledge of Glad-
stone, went from his knees to the business
of the nation ? Mr. Gladstone himself,
so Frederic Harrison reminds us, thought
Morley's Life of Cobden defective in re-
ligious appreciation. In his own case
the difficulty would seem vastly greater.
But it is vanquished ambulando. Frank-
ly stating that he can only describe from
the exterior Gladstone's religious nature
Morley & Gladstone.
65
and activities, Mr. Morley at once rises
to serene impartiality of spirit in saying :
" It was the affinity of great natures for
great issues that made Mr. Gladstone
from his earliest manhood onwards take
and hold fast the affairs of the churches
for the objects of his most absorbing in-
terest. He was one and the same man,
his genius was one. His persistent in-
cursions all through his long life into
the multifarious doings, not only of his
own Anglican communion, but of the
Latin church of the West, as well as of
the motley Christendom of the East,
puzzled and vexed political whippers-in,
wire-pullers, newspaper editors, leaders,
colleagues ; they were the despair of
party caucuses ; and they made the neu-
tral man of the world smile, as eccen-
tricities of genius and rather singularly
chosen recreations. All this was, in
truth, of the very essence of his charac-
ter, the manifestation of its profound
unity." If that does not echo the emo-
tional sympathy of a brother in the faith,
it at least shows us the sound and fair
critic. Mr. Morley, in reality, sets forth
the churchly and the Christian side of
Gladstone with satisfactory clearness, if
not with all ecclesiastical amplitude. The
most apprehensive Anglican must con-
fess the picture to be faithful. Minuter
traits are not overlooked. We are shown
Gladstone's Cromwellian habit of being
greatly stayed by some verse of Scrip-
ture when goingf orth to oratorical slaugh-
ter. If anything is left out it is the
laughter, or the mockery, which Mr.
Gladstone's consuming religious zeal so
often provoked in the ungodly. Their
gibes Mr. Morley passes by. Kinglake,
for example, was only one of many to
call Mr. Gladstone " a good man in the
worst sense of the , term, conscientious
with a disordered conscience." And it
was in an " Imaginary Conversation "
between Madame Novikoff and Gort-
chakoff that the same brilliant but bit-
ter writer conveyed wittily the general
impression of the way in which Glad-
VOL. xcin. — NO. 555. 5
stone's theological flank lay open to at-
tack : —
" Gortchakoff : How did you get hold
of Gladstone ?
" Madame Novikoff : Rien de plus
simple. Four or five years ago I asked
what was his weak point, and was told
that he had two — ' Effervescence ' and
'Theology.' With that knowledge I
found it all child's play to manage him.
I just sent him to Munich, and there
boiled him up in a weak decoction of
Filioque, then kept him ready for use,
and impatiently awaited the moment
when our plans for getting up the ' Bul-
garian atrocities ' should be mature," etc.
Whatever might have been dreaded in
regard to Mr. Morley's painting of Glad-
stone the theologian, everybody must
have recognized his peculiar advantage
in describing Gladstone the statesman.
It is the advantage of first-hand acquain-
tance with the matter. This enables him
not only to understand, but to give those
realistic touches of experience which we
find, for example, in Condorcet's Life
of Turgot, Disraeli's sketch of Bentinck,
Rosebery's Pitt, and Schurz's Clay. Sat-
urated for years in politics, himself active
in the movements that he describes, an
intimate of the men who made the history
it is his task to write, Mr. Morley is able
to light up his pages with many a flash
of personal familiarity. Thus when the
mysterious break-up of a certain Cabinet
is under discussion, he turns this ray
upon the problem, — " Perhaps the Min-
isters had grown weary of each other."
That could have occurred to no one who
had not himself kissed hands and held
a portfolio. Even his journalistic years
yield Mr. Morley something, as when,
referring to an unhappy attempt to " in-
spire " a newspaper, he remarks : " Un-
luckily, it would seem to need at least the
genius of a Bismarck to perform with
precision and success the delicate office
of inspiring a modern oracle on the jour-
nalistic tripod."
Mr. Morley is no idolizing biographer.
66
Morley's Gladstone.
His critic's eye is not dazzled even by the
splendid orb of Gladstone's genius. He
sees and points out the flecks in the bril-
liance. With resolute hand he unveils for
us the deep mystery of Mr. Gladstone's
complex nature, — simply duplex, his
enemies called it. This personal interest
is, after all, the most compelling thing in
the 1800 pages. Old political issues —
Maynooth and the Gorham judgment,
distribution bills and budgets, even Bul-
garia and Irish Home Rule — seem far
away and burned out compared with the
perennial charm and vitality of a domi-
nant human personality. In Gladstone
there was as extraordinary a union of
opposites as ever met in one breast.
" Ah," said a disapproving old Whig, at
the time of the 1860 budget, " Oxford on
the surface, but Liverpool below." This
was but one of the many phrases in which
Gladstone's remarkable dualism of char-
acter was bodied forth. He was at once
the meticulous scholastic theologian, and
the prodigious worker in the practical.
This strange mingling of qualities, with
its resultant perils, Mr. Morley puts
fairly before us. A hair-splitting intel-
lect yoked to immense moral enthusiasm
was certain to lead its owner into awk-
ward passages, and to lay him open to the
charge of sophistry or insincerity. The
subtly mediaeval tinge of Mr. Gladstone's
mind was perceived with marvelous clar-
ity of vision by Walter Bagehot, in that
acute analysis of the man which he pub-
lished as far back as 1860. " His intel-
lect is of a thoroughly scholastic kind.
He can distinguish between any two pro-
positions ; he never allowed, he could not
allow, that any two were identical. If
any one on either side of the House is
bold enough to infer anything from any-
thing, Mr. Gladstone is ready to deny that
the inference is accurate — to suggest
a distinction which he says is singularly
important — to illustrate an apt subtlety
which, in appeai'ance at least, impairs the
validity of the deduction. No schoolman
could be readier at such work. ... It
must be pleasant to have an argumenta-
tive acuteness which is quite sure to ex-
tricate you, at least in appearance, from
any intellectual scrape. But it is a dan-
gerous weapon to use, and particularly
dangerous to a very conscientious man.
He will not use it unless he believes in its
results ; but he will try to believe in its
results, in order that he may use it."
Mr. Morley practically acquiesces in
this diagnosis. Indeed, confirmation of
it rains upon any one who closely follows
Gladstone's career, and notes the im-
pression he made upon different men.
" He perplexes his chief [Sir Robert
Peel]," writes Lord Rosebery of Glad-
stone, in his little book on Peel, "who
complains of sometimes finding great dif-
ficulty in exactly comprehending what
he means." This recalls a saying of the
Pope : " I like, but I do not understand,
Mr. Gladstone." It was a complaint
which dogged Gladstone from his earliest
to his latest years. In 1830 he wrote a
long letter to his father urging that he be
permitted to give his life to the Church.
There were in it sentences of burning and
martyr-like devotion, but alongside stand
others which leave one uncertain what
the youth really wanted. This " vague
and obscure " letter is, observes Mr. Mor-
ley, " the first definite indication alike
of the extraordinary intensity of his reli-
gious disposition, and of that double-mind-
edness, that division of sensibility be-
tween the demands of spiritual and of
secular life, which remained throughout
one of the marking traits of his career."
From this involved letter at twenty-one,
down to his apparent but Orphic denial
that he was to resign the premiership at
eighty-five, — though he promptly did it,
— Gladstone left behind him an enor-
mous number of letters, articles, and
speeches in which lurking qualifications,
meaning everything to him, though un-
perceived by the general, lay as so many
snares for the unwary, so many causes of
wrath to the plain and blunt Englishman
who blurts his whole mind out. No won-
Morley's Gladstone.
67
der that this trait " sometimes amused
friends, but always exasperated foes. . . .
His adversary, as he strode confidently
along the smooth grass, suddenly found
himself treading on a serpent; he had
overlooked a condition, a proviso, a word
of hypothesis or contingency, that sprang
from its ambush and brought his triumph
to naught on the spot. If Mr. Gladstone
had only taken as much trouble that his
hearers should understand exactly what
it was that he meant, as he took trouble
afterwards to show that his meaning had
been grossly misunderstood, all might
have been well. As it was, he seemed
to be completely satisfied if he could
only show that two propositions, thought
by plain men to be directly contradic-
tory, were all the time capable on close
construction of being presented in perfect
harmony."
Along with this tendency to " over-
refining in words, a disproportionate im-
pressiveness in verbal shadings without
real difference," went an amazing com-
bativeness. This is perhaps a part of the
oratorical temperament. Fox was once
reproached for disputing vehemently
about a trifle. " I must do so," he said ;
" I can't live without discussion." To
quote Bagehot again : " Mr. Gladstone
by nature, by vehement overruling na-
ture, longs to pour forth his own belief ;
he cannot rest till he has contradicted
every one else." This made the most
peace-loving of statesmen the most pug-
nacious of debaters. " He can bear a
good deal about the politics of Europe ;
but let a man question the fees on vatting,
or the change in the game certificate,
or the stamp on bills of lading — what
melodious thunders of loquacious wrath !
The world, he hints, is likely to end at
such observations." Indeed, great as
were Mr. Gladstone's oratorical powers
in exposition or persuasion, they never
blazed so high as in rejoinder. " He is
terrible in the rebound," testified Lord
Aberdeen. This falls in with what Glad-
stone himself said, when asked if he were
ever nervous about speaking. " In open-
ing, yes ; in reply, never."
But this intense nature was not always
in the white heat of mighty labor or close-
joined debate. He had his lighter, play-
ful side. The bow was sometimes unbent.
His wonderful charm in undress conversa-
tion, his story-telling, his mimicry, his fa-
cile acting — to say nothing of his stores
of out-of-the-way knowledge and exhaust-
less fund of reminiscence — built up a
strong and enduring tradition of his fas-
cinating personality in private life. But
almost all of this part of Gladstone is left
in the shadow by Mr. Morley. He asserts
its existence, but he illustrates it only in
the most meagre way. Presumably, au-
thentic material was lacking. There was
no Boswell by, unluckily. Mr. Morley
prints twenty-five pages of his own notes
of Gladstone's conversation on successive
days at Biarritz. It is bookish, glancing,
rather superficial ; little quotable, no-
where making a deep impression, though
showing a great range of reading for a
busy public man. In his letters Mr.
Gladstone seems never to have overflowed
in raillery or anecdote. All was intent
on the matter in hand. It was as if the
previous question were always on the
point of being ordered. Even in the
correspondence with his friend of many
years, the Duchess of Sutherland, one
finds little of that lightsome play of mind
which an intellectual woman will call out
of a man if he has it in him. This helps
us to understand the Queen's complaint
that Gladstone always talked to her as
if she were a public meeting. The net
result is to make his letters uninteresting,
except as fixing disputed dates and the
true order of his unfolding policy ; so
that Mr. Morley was wise to publish but
a few pf the thousands that were turned
over to him. Nor is Gladstone's private
diary richer in the asides and leisurely
jottings of a full mind. It was strictly
business, — a kind of skeleton agenda or
adjudicata. It was a record, and re-
cords are not lively reading. And yet,
68
Morley's Gladstone.
and yet, we know that there was a Glad-
stone who could disarm and delight even
his enemies by his bright bravura at din-
ner or reception ; who gave George Rus-
sell some of his best and wickedest sto-
ries, — even that one about the swearing
Archbishop of Canterbury ; who pursued
the oddest fads with enthusiasm, and
took up with the wildest fashions in a
spirit of hilarity. In Lord Malmesbury's
memoirs we find him writing in 1844 :
"Met Mr. Gladstone, a man who is much
spoken of as one who will come to the
front. We were disappointed at his ap-
pearance, which is that of a Roman Cath-
olic ecclesiastic." But twenty years later
the same nobleman wrote : " Gladstone,
who was always fond of music, is now
quite enthusiastic about negro melodies,
singing them with the greatest spirit and
enjoyment, never leaving out a verse, and
evidently preferring such as ' Camptown
Races.' " Punch seized upon the con-
trast of monk and negro minstrel, and
had its caricature of Mr. Gladstone in
clerical black, his downcast eyes upon
his breviary ; with a parallel portrait dis-
playing him in the exaggerated dress of
the end man, screaming, " Oh, do dah
dey ! " But no comic art, testifies an in-
timate of the family, " could body forth
a more amusing picture than the scene
in real life when Mr. Gladstone, taking
Mrs. Gladstone by the hand, would war-
ble the song of the wandering fiddler : —
' A ragamuffin husband and a rantipoling wife.
We '11 fiddle it and scrape it through the ups
and downs of life.' "
One can only sigh and wish that it had
been in Mr. Morley's power to give us
more of this Gladstone. We moderns
would not be so fastidious as Greville,
who confided to his diary, in 1854, that
he conld not dispute Gladstone's " ex-
traordinary capacity," but noted that " I
was not prepared to hear the Chancellor
of the Exchequer warble a sentimental
ballad, accompanied by his wife."
For so conspicuously marked and bril-
liant a young man, Mr. Gladstone's
political development was strangely slow.
He signally defied the saying that the
great driving impulses come to a man
under thirty. Gladstone was fifty be-
fore it even became certain to which
political party he was to belong. A dis-
heartening list of reactionary measures
had his early approval. But his sympa-
thies broadened with time ; he burst
through the hard casing of his Oxford
education, and began to be of Burke's
approved type of statesman, — one who,
with a disposition to preserve, united the
ability to improve. His improvements, no
doubt, often looked like willful changes.
It was said of him that he could let
nothing alone — in flat defiance of Lord
Melbourne's counsel of political wisdom.
" Sir," said an old distributer of revenue
stamps, " I must resign. My head is
worn out. The Chancellor, sir, is im-
posing of things that I can't understand."
Many others rebelled at Mr. Gladstone's
appalling industry of innovation. Yet
one supreme test always differentiated
him from the mere agitator. He was
ever ready with his bill to enact his
policy. His outcry was not the vague
protest which aims at it knows not what.
His grievances he stood ready to reduce
to writing, and produced his remedy in
the form of an act of Parliament. It
was not his way to carry an election on
blown promises, and then, when chal-
lenged on the score of fulfillment, to fall
back with the audacious cynicism of a
Disraeli upon the assertion that " many
things have happened " since the pledge
was made. " Do you call that amus-
ing ? " he asked Browning, when the
poet once told him of " Dizzy's " latest
duplicity ; " I call it devilish." And
through all the changes of front which
he had to offer to a changing enemy,
Gladstone held fast to some one princi-
ple which, to him at least, was vital.
This is no place to review his Irish policy.
Those who wish to must go to Mr. Mor-
ley. But one thing may be said. From
the moment that Gladstone bent his mind
Morley' s Gladstone.
69
to the discovery of a real cure for the
chronic malady of Irish misgovernment,
he clung to the central conception which
he formed, through good report and
through evil report. One dismal failure
more, or a splendid posthumous success
— and it is too soon to say which his
Home Rule scheme will be rated by his-
tory — in his personal attitude through-
out the great debate he seemed to be the
visible realization of Coleridge's prayer:
" How miserably imbecile and objectless
has the English government of Ireland
been for forty years past ! Oh ! for a
great man — but one really great man —
who could feel the weight and the power
of a principle, and unflinchingly put it
into act ! "
But all Mr. Gladstone's political prin-
ciples were subsumed in one. " Political
life was only part of his religious life."
Mr. Morley writes : " At nearly every
page of Mr. Gladstone's active career,
the vital problem stares us in the face of
the correspondence between the rule of
private morals and of public. Is the
rule one and the same for the individual
and the state ? From his early years
onwards, Mr. Gladstone's whole language
and the moods that it reproduces, — his
vivid denunciations, his sanguine expec-
tations, his rolling epithets, his aspects
and appeals and points of view, — all take
for granted that right and wrong depend
on the same set of maxims in public life
and in private. The puzzle will often
greet us, and here it is enough to glance
at it. In every statesman's case it arises ;
in Mr. Gladstone's it is cardinal and
fundamental." It is, of course, easy for
the closet moralist to maintain that the
law of right conduct is for the politician
exactly what it is for the man ; but for a
leader of a great party in a democracy
to assert it, and proudly to challenge
the testing of his own political course
through many years by this touchstone —
that is another thing. It would be ab-
surd to say that Mr. Gladstone always
emerges triumphant from the ordeal.
No intellect but one as subtle and refin-
ing as his own could make out a clear
moral consistency in all the crises of his
public career. He himself confesses to
a certain opportunism. The difficulty of
saying at a given moment just what is
the greater good, he admits. But there
lies the hidden rock for the Christian
statesman. A little weak compromising
to save the party, concealment or truck-
ling for the sake of " the cause," doubt
whether the nation might not suffer more
by your renouncing the devil, and being
driven out of office for it, than by speak-
ing him fair and staying in to compass
your beneficent ends, — those are the
nice distinctions which make political
morality so dubious and controverted.
That Gladstone never left a gap between
his principles and his acts need not be
contended. Mr. Morley defends no such
thesis. But the principles were so high,
and the approximation to them in prac-
tice so remarkable, — in the age of Bis-
marck, — that Gladstone was, in this
respect, if not impeccable, at least first,
and the rest nowhere, among the com-
manding public figures of his time.
This trait of a higher standard and a
severer morality early impressed those
who observed him narrowly. " The only
Cabinet Minister of five years' standing,"
wrote Cobden in 1859, " who is not afraid
to let his heart guide his head a little at
times." This was particularly the case
in all matters affecting foreign relations.
He. was the most plain-spoken and fear-
less of diplomats. Every one recalls the
lengths he went in denouncing the Aus-
trian government during his Midlothian
campaign. For this, when taking office
again, he made an apology as Minister of
the Crown ; as Gladstone the man, his
opinions doubtless remained the same.
"Gladstone," wrote the Duke of New-
castle to Abraham Hay ward in 1858, " is
not a diplomat, and probably spoke in the
salons of Count Beust very much what he
felt about the tyrannies of Bomba, or those
of some of our more intimate friends."
70
Morley's Gladstone.
That early and chivalrous championing
of the wretched in Naples marked a hu-
mane and lofty impulse which never
ceased to vibrate under appeal. Glad-
stone left a mass of notes for a volume
which he once contemplated on Future
Retribution. The pages were found dock-
eted : " From this I was called away to
write on Bulgaria." The present scorch-
ing of sinners could not wait as well as the
Day of Judgment. Mr. Gladstone had
an extraordinary capacity for righteous
indignation. What his flaming speech
against giant injustice could do in the way
of impressing the popular imagination,
let his sweeping victory of 1880, in the
teeth of the wisest political prophets, be
the witness. And as the historian J. R.
Green wrote to Humphry Ward : " Let
us never forget that the triumph is his.
He and he only among the Liberals I met
never despaired. He and he only fore-
saw what the verdict on this ' great trial '
would be. When folk talk of ' cool-head-
ed statesmen ' and ' sentimental rhetori-
cians ' again, I shall always call to mind
that in taking stock of English opinion at
this crisis the sentimental rhetorician was
right and the cool-headed statesmen were
wrong." Mr. Morley quotes Green's
glowing tribute to the leader of whom he
was so proud, — the man who " was al-
ways noble of soul." Mr. Gladstone had
the power of thus impressing widely di-
verse natures. Large -fibred Spurgeon
rivaled the finely grained Green in admi-
ration. " We believe," he wrote, " in no
man's infallibility, but it is restful to be
sure of one man's integrity." " That ad-
mirable sentence," comments Mr. Mor-
ley, " marks the secret." No ordinary
man could have so clasped to himself
such differing supporters. At Oxford,
he had Pusey's vote, and he had Jowett's.
Of this richly endowed and flashing
nature, what was the master-passion ?
Gladstone himself thought it was a love
of human liberty. He worked out into
it slowly. Oxford scholasticism and Ox-
ford prejudice long smothered the sacred
flame. But at last it burst out. Blazingbe-
fore the eyesof all the world, it gave Glad-
stone his peculiar fame, — friend of hu-
manity, enemy of all tyrants. An extract
from his journal in 1879 lets us into his
inner mind : " I am writing in the last
minutes of the seventh decade of my life.
... It is hardly possible that I should com-
plete another decade. . . . For the last
three and a half years I have been pass-
ing through a political experience which
is, I believe, without example in our par-
liamentary history. I profess to believe
it has been an occasion when the battle to
be fought was a battle of justice, human-
ity, freedom, law, all in their first ele-
ments from the very root, and all on a
gigantic scale. The word spoken was a
word for millions, and for millions who
for themselves cannot speak. If I really
believe this, then I should regard my
having been morally forced into this
work as a great and high election of God.
. . . Such are some of an old man's
thoughts, in whom there is still something
that consents not to be old." Nor did it
for fifteen years thereafter. That frame
of steel bore him later into still fiercer
battles for the inarticulate oppressed. His
intellect, with its wonderful strength and
its almost equally wonderful weaknesses,
— entirely dead, as it was, to the whole
scientific movement of his age, — flamed
high and steady for a decade and a half
longer before the men who followed him,
like another Dandolo, to a nobler fight ;
while over all, a pillar of cloud by day
and fire by night, was that moral enthu-
siasm, that majestic rage for truth and
right and justice which made Gladstone
an inspiring leader not simply of a party,
but of mankind.
Hollo Ogden.
Birch Creek Canon. 71
BIRCH CREEK CANON.
THREE pines stand out against the tawny hill,
With long roots reaching down among the moss ;
A slender aspen slants with leaves a-thrill,
And at its foot a charred log leans across
The damp black rocks, the fronded ferns, the thread
Of silver glittering from its gravel bed.
Feeling its way beneath low briers and brush
The stream slips onward, fed by hidden springs ;
A crystal murmur in the canon's hush,
Through splintered rocks, and wild sweet growing things,
Into the shade where narrowing pine-walls rise
Dark on the blue of burning stainless skies.
(0 my heart's heart, beyond the purple pines,
A thousand leagues beyond the sunset hill,
I find you here, where yonder wild-rose twines ;
Your step has left the aspen leaves a-thrill ;
Your voice was here but now — or whence this ache
Of poignant silence, sweet on brier and brake ? )
By shadowed banks the water murmurs on,
Where shelving ledges shut the light away,
With glitters from the darkness come and gone,
And ripples gleaming out against the day,
And silver flash of fins, where lurking trout
From the green shadow of the ledge leap out.
A black birch swings its lustrous branches down,
Flecking the sunlight through its checkered screen,
Above the boulders mossed with lichens brown,
And fallen leaves, and starry tufts of green.
On either slope the serried fir trees wait
Rank after rank, to guard the canon gate.
(0 my heart's heart, beyond that guarded watt
A world of struggle lies between us still ;
Yet you are here ! I felt your shadow fall
But now across the grassy sunlit hill,
And where the fir-boughs yonder interlace
Could I but venture, I should find your face.)
Mabel Earle.
72
Koxella's Prisoner.
ROXELLA'S PRISONER.
THE house part, painted white with
neat green blinds, faced the village and
the sunrise with an air of conscious rec-
titude, which quite overshadowed all
suggestion of bad company. The dingy
stone structure in its rear looked away
through narrow close-barred windows to
the open country and the hills. There
were no other buildings near, for the
shire town of Evergreen County was but
a sleepy country village after all, and
prospecting home builders by common
consent avoided the near neighborhood
of Evergreen County Jail. Yet it had
been a not unpeaceful neighborhood in
years gone by. For long months of many
years the narrow stone rooms had stood
closed and tenantless, or open only to
admit a mild offender for the briefest
possible term. Evergreen County was
the banner county of the state, and Pe-
terson Thomas, who had been its sheriff,
and jailer for twelve successive years,
boasted freely of the county's record
during that time. "We ain't sent but
three to State Prison in all them years, "
he was fond of asserting, "and one of
them I never felt sure ought to gone;
this circumstantial evidence is a terri-
ble clincher when it comes to provin'
things that could have happened so and
so whether they actually did or not.
The other two I ain't got nothin' to say
for. They might have been guilty of
the crimes charged against 'em, and then
again they mightn't. But I'm free
to confess, after a close acquaintance of
two months, that prison was the proper
place for 'em both on any charge what-
soever that would gain 'em entrance
there, whether they did it or not. I
never could see no real good reason why
the brains we send down to Augusty year
after year, and pay 'em high to go,
could n't make a law that '11 take care
of the natural-born criminal before he
actually jeperdizes the safety an' well-
bein' of the community. A villain 's a
villain so fur as that goes, and any hon-
est man of good judgment can size him
up first jest as easy as last. But then
professional villains ain't common to
Evergreen County. No, sir. Our folks
for the most part are an honest, good-in-
tentioned sort of fellers, who 'd done a
heap better if they hadn't meant so
well. Weak wills and shif tlessness may
be full as aggravatin' as crime, but
they 're more respectable."
For Jailer Thomas in his career as
sheriff had learned to regard his pris-
oners with much the same loyalty which
Dr. Roswell, president of a neighboring
college, felt toward his students.
"If the other party don't increase in
power more 'n they have, Emily Ann,
you and me bids fair to die in harness, "
Jailer Thomas frequently assured his
good wife. "Well, we might done
worse. It 's a peaceful life, and our
record 's one to be proud of. Heaven
grant there don't no murders nor bank
robberies come up in this county to dis-
grace us in our old age."
That the thirteenth year of his term
of office entered upon Friday was not at
the time regarded by the good man as
a specially ominous circumstance, yet
he recalled it mournfully when, in the
months following, the jail experienced
what Mrs. Thomas declared to be "a
terrible rush of business, " and seven of
its ten cells were occupied at once by
offenders of varying degrees of crime.
Peterson Thomas was plunged in gloom.
"We 're goin' back on our record," he
declared mournfully. "I 'd ought to
let well enough alone, and refused to run
the thirteenth year." His dejection
did not lessen when just before spring
planting an attack of lumbago prostrated
the energetic mistress of the house.
"I sh'll have to have a girl, Peter-
son," she said tearfully, — "I that 's
Roxella's Prisoner.
73
made my boasts never once to have hired
a day's work or a washing done in all
my married life. Poor health in it-
self 's a dretful affliction, but it rs no-
thin' in my opinion to the hired help
which comes in its train." Sheriff
Thomas, sitting hopelessly on the edge
of her bed, whistled a funeral march in
dreary notes.
"The case is peculiar, " he declared
as the tune came to an end, "and or-
dinary hired help ain't fit to be trusted
with county responsibilities. I wonder
if one of Hiram Hodges 's girls would
n't come down for a spell jest to accom-
modate. The Hodgeses are mighty de-
pendable stock, and in pickin' a hired
help for the county I feel jest as I did
in pickin' a wife for myself, — the best
ain't none too good."
"I don't believe but what they
would, " assented Mrs. Thomas in a re-
lieved tone. " Never havin' been used
to village life, those girls wouldn't be
light-headed and flighty like so many
young folks nowadays. You better set
right down and write up to their folks. "
So it came about that one April
morning Roxella, youngest of Hiram
Hodges 's seven daughters, stood just
behind Jailer Thomas while he unlocked
the heavy iron door which shut the
stone jail off from the white house.
Roxella's rosy cheeks were a little pale.
"I'm almost scairt, " she acknow-
ledged in an awestruck whisper. "Are
they awful bad ? "
" Bad enough, " returned Jailer
Thomas, whose gloom was still appar-
ent. "There ain't no actual murderers
among them that 's ever manifested
themselves as such, but there 's one
sheep thief which makes the general
average pretty low. That 's him sulk-
in' by the window of his cell 'way down
along. I 've had several sheep thieves
more or less in the last twelve years,
but I can't recall one that 's ever turned
out well yet. Now mind, Roxelly, you
ain't to hold any converse with 'em
whatsoever. I don't know what your
father 'n' mother 'd say to me lettin'
you sweep this corridor anyhow, but
I 'm clear at my wit's end unless you do.
I 'm too fur behind with the county's
plantin' to do any more such work my-
self, and I don't dare risk Emily Ann
gettin' around to see it in this state.
Like enough she 'd have a relapse.
You ain't scairt, be you? There ain't
none of 'em really dangerous. If they
speak to you don't answer. They get
sassy sometimes."
Left alone in the long chilly corridor,
lighted only by a high window at either
end, Roxella strove to quiet her fears.
"There is n't anything to be scared of, "
she assured herself, even while uncom-
fortably mindful of interested faces
looking out upon her from five of the
grated doors.
"Good-mornin', miss, how long are
you in fur? " called a derisive voice.
"Sent up for stealin' some poor fel-
ler's heart most likely, " added another.
Roxella did not even glance toward
the line of doors, but commenced her
work in a far corner by an unoccupied
cell. " I won't be scared, " she insisted
to herself, and in an attempt to prove
it began the first verse of Pull for the
Shore, in a voice which quavered no-
ticeably at first, but increased in power
as she sang. "That 's a handsome piece,
miss ; give us another, " suggested the
prisoner who had first accosted her, as
the song came to an end. The voice at
least held no note of wickedness, and
Roxella, though mindful of her instruc-
tions to make no reply, summoned cour-
age for a glance in its direction. The
glance was followed at intervals in her
work by others toward the line of faces
still regarding her with deep interest.
Roxella's spirits lightened suddenly,
and she was conscious that she had ex-
pected to find these prisoners not unlike
the Wild Man from Orinoco, who had
grimaced and gnashed his teeth at her
from his securely barred cage in the cir-
cus at Plainville last summer. These
men, hardened criminals though they
74
Roxella^s Prisoner.
were in Roxella's estimation, differed
not in general appearance from the cus-
tomers she was accustomed to serve in
her father's little country hotel far up
the river. Four of them were young,
not so very far past her own age. The
fifth, a gray-haired man, whose mild
blue eyes smiled vacantly upon her,
called her Susie, and begged her to
bring him a handful of dandelions from
the grassy yard below. Roxella hesi-
tated. Jailer Thomas's prohibition of
conversation had not included dande-
lions. "He ain't wicked so much as
he is foolish, " decided Roxella as she
passed the coveted blossoms through
the grating. " And goodness knows
I 've seen fools enough in my life, so
I needn't be scared of them." She
shook her head in refusal of a polite
request for squash blossoms from cell
No. 4, and even smiled guardedly at
No. 3's petition for a fresh watermelon.
It was not so bad after all ; these young
men might have been a party of honest
woodsmen come in for supper after
a hard day's toil. She glanced with
some apprehension at the occupant of
No. 6, who had thus far taken no no-
tice of her presence. "That 's the sheep
stealer, " she remembered uncomfort-
ably, with a second glance at the stal-
wart figure which stood back to the door
with hands deep in its pockets, staring
out of the narrow window. " He looks
dangerous, " decided Roxella.
There was one more prisoner, a little
apart from the others, in cell No. 9.
Roxella noticed with some curiosity
that this cell was larger than the oth-
ers and rather more comfortable. A
vase of flowers stood upon the window
ledge, and a table with writing mate-
rials occupied the centre of the room.
A young man whose dress was some-
what superior to that of the other pris-
oners sat beside the table, his head
pillowed upon his folded arms. Roxel-
la observed that his hair was black and
curly, and wondered as she carefully
swept the corners of his doorway what
injustice or misfortune had brought him
here. "He certainly ain't like the
others, " she decided, even before the
prisoner lifted his head to regard her
mournfully with large eyes set in a face
of startling pallor. He sighed heavily
and dropped his head upon his arms
once more. The girl's heart stirred
with pity, and she began to regret the
command which prevented an expres-
sion of it. She lingered a little by the
door, wondering if he would address
her, but he took no further notice of
her presence.
" Roxelly, " said Peterson Thomas
doubtfully, three mornings later, "do
you s 'pose you could give the board-
ers their feed, come noontime, for a
spell? Now we're workin' on that
northeast medder I could save an hour
for the county ev'ry day by not comin'
home. I hate to have you do it, but it
don't seem jest right to waste the coun-
ty's time. You wouldn't be scairt,
would you ? "
Roxella consented readily. "Not a
mite," she declared.
"So fur as that goes," Peterson
Thomas continued musingly, "I s'pose
you 've fed worse criminals 'n they be,
many 's the time, and never give it a
thought. The criminals ain't all be-
hind bars, and there 's some men in
that ought to be out, though that ain't
for us to settle. I ain't sayin' but
what there 's such in this very jail.
However, our part is to keep 'em safe
and give 'em enough to eat. Nobody
livin' can't say a prisoner ever went
hungry from this jail yet. You 're
sure you ain't scairt? Well, don't talk
to 'em, and above all don't let 'em
think you feel scared."
"I ain't," Roxella declared stoutly.
"I 've got all over that."
"It 's funny," she said reflectively,
sitting by Mrs. Thomas's bedside a
week later. "But there ain't a man
up there that 's done a thing to be put
in for without it 's the sheep stealer,
and he don't say a word as to whether
Roxella's Prisoner.
75
he did or didn't. They don't any of
'em say a word about each other, but
accordin' to each man's own story there
ain't a guilty one there."
"There never is," replied the pros-
trate mistress of the house skeptically.
"In all the years I 've been here we 've
never had one that was guilty by his
own showin', except a crazy man who
confessed to a crime he never commit-
ted, and was proved innocent against his
own testimony. You can't help their
running on to you I s'pose, but you
mustn't talk back to 'em, Roxelly.
Peterson would be terrible put out."
"No, ma'am, I don't, " replied Rox-
ella obediently, adding a moment later,
"that is, not without it 's just to pass
the time of day, or say ' do tell ' or ' is
that so ? ' or something. I don't even do
that much talkin' with the sheep man.
He acts dreadful ill natured. You don't
suppose he 's dangerous, do you? "
Mrs. Thomas shook her head con-
temptuously. "There never was one of
his breed had spunk enough to be dan-
gerous, " she said. "They 're a bad lot
all through, and Peterson and I both
hope he '11 get a long term when his
case comes up. Just let him sulk it out
and take no notice of him."
Roxella portioned the plain fare pro-
vided by Evergreen County for its
prisoners into seven narrow tin trays,
and surveyed it doubtfully. "I s'pose
a hotel bringin* up makes this look
meaner, " she mused ; "but the county 's
well-to-do, and on the ground of holdin'
every man innocent till he 's proved
guilty I must say I can't see any justice
in it. No. 9 don't eat enough to keep a
mouse alive, and I believe his appetite
needs temptin'. Neither the county
nor Peterson Thomas would want him
to go into a decline on their hands."
She resolutely added a rhubarb pie
to the tray, and carefully cut it in seven
impartial sections. "Nobody ever told
me not to, " she protested to her con-
science as she traversed the long corri-
dor, "and anyhow rhubarb's cheap."
"I '11 leave it for you to say," she
said, standing pie in hand before the
door of cell No. 1. "The county ain't
been accustomed to servin' desserts, but
those that think they ain't undeservin'
of pie can have it."
There was no apparent feeling of
unworthiness until she timidly repeated
her formula at the door of No. 6. To
her surprise the tall prisoner smiled and
shook his head. "I guess I ain't wor-
thy, miss, " he admitted, attacking his
bread and potatoes with the appetite of
a hungry man. Roxella reflected upon
his hardened character as she went on
to No. 9, who pushed aside the plainer
food disdainfully, but consumed the
two remaining pieces of pie with appar-
ent relish. "It reminds me of home,"
he said in a subdued tone. "I was
longing for a piece of my mother's pie
this morning when I saw you pulling
rhubarb' in the jail garden. I have
watched you far more than you know
in the past two weeks. You can never
realize how a true woman's presence
brightens even a gloomy prison. I hope
your womanly powers of perception
have revealed to you that I am not like
these others." Roxella blushed.
"Of course I couldn't help seeing
there was a difference, " she acknow-
ledged shyly.
"A political prisoner has much to
endure of injustice and persecution, "
he continued sadly; "but he has the
satisfaction of knowing that no one, not
even his enemies, can rate him with the
common criminal. My only crime is
in loving my native land too well. Yet
in the dreary days which passed before
you came to lighten the darkness I never
regretted it."
Roxella listened attentively. It
sounded like a book.
"It's a downright pity," she de-
clared in deeply sympathetic tones.
"I wish there was something more I
could do for you, " she added bash-
fully. "Could you relish a custard, do
you suppose ? "
76
Roxella's Prisoner.
"Your sympathy is more help than
you realize, " he replied sadly. "Cus-
tard, did you say? Yes, mother used
to make those too."
The six worthy prisoners dined upon
custards next day. "For I ain't goin'
to show partiality even if he is differ-
ent, " Roxella decided.
The day following there was ice
cream. "The county can afford it,"
Roxella assured herself, resolutely sti-
fling a guilty pang.
She went one afternoon to answer an
unaccustomed peal of the front door
bell, and received from the hands of a
ten-year-old girl a large basket and a
bouquet of lilac blossoms. "For pa, "
the child explained. "Hiram Risley,
you know. He 's stoppin' here a spell. "
Roxella hesitated. "I don't know
whether it 's against the rules or not, "
she acknowledged frankly, "and Mis'
Thomas is havin' a poor day, so I can't
ask her. Her lumbago 's developed into
nervous prostration. Never mind, sis,
I '11 risk it. What 's your pa's num-
ber did you say ? "
The child looked puzzled. "What 's
he in for? " Roxella continued.
"Nothin' at all," the child returned
hotly. " They said he stole John Fre-
mont's sheep ; but he never, for ma
says he never. "
Roxella carried the basket to the
door of No. 6 and tapped gently.
"Your folks have sent you some lit-
tle tokens, " she explained. The tall
prisoner's face lighted.
"Well, now, that 's something I was
n't lookin' for," he said.
"Most people get more or less that
they don't really deserve," remarked
Roxella. "I hope 'twill lead you to
serious thoughts of a better life. " She
crowded the lilacs through the grating
as she spoke and looked doubtfully at
the basket. "This won't go through;
shall I open the basket and pass the
things in ? " she asked. He looked with
interest at the doughnuts and ^ponge
cake.
"I don't know why it should be
made easier for me any more than other
men," he said aloud. "I guess I won't
eat any, miss. You just pass the sweet
stuff round among the boys wherever
you think it 's needed most, and give'
the flowers to Uncle Petingill. He '11
like 'em to play with, poor old soul.
For me, I '11 take jail life just as it
comes."
Roxella delivered the lilacs to the
delighted old man, then carried the
basket straight to No. 9.
"The sheep man don't feel worthy
of all this which his folks has sent, "
she explained. "And I 'm glad to see
him show a little proper feelin'. Could
you relish a piece ? " He finally ac-
cepted the entire loaf of cake under
protest. "The others like doughnuts
best, so I will leave them all for them, "
he said. "The cake isn't frosted as
mother used to do, but it may be I can
eat a piece. " He slipped a folded paper
through the grate.
"This will show you how I brighten
the weary hours," he explained.
It was a little poem, written upon
a sheet of letter paper and entitled A
Fettered Bird. "It was just lovely,"
Roxella assured him next day as she
passed a tiny dish of early strawberries
through the grate.
She was becoming very good friends
with most of the prisoners, even while
following Sheriff Thomas's command to
say little to them . " You can get pretty
well acquainted with folks by just lis-
tening, " Roxella decided. She brought
to the gray-haired man in No. 2 a daily
offering of spring blossoms, wrote occa-
sional letters for illiterate No. 3, and
one June afternoon paused triumphant-
ly before the door of No. 5, bearing
upon Mrs. Thomas's best china platter
a frosted mound encircled by exactly
two dozen wild roses. Upon the snowy
surface of the cake, wrought in pink
candy, was the inscription "No. 5 aged
24." "It 's angel underneath," Rox-
ella announced. "Too bad you can't
Roxella's Prisoner.
11
have it whole, but I 've brought a long
knife so you could cut it yourself through
the grating and then take in the pieces.
I heard you holler to No. 4 this morn-
in' about to-day bein' your birthday."
No. 5 sliced the cake carefully, con-
cealing beneath a gay exterior some real
emotion. "There never was any wo-
man livin' ever made me a birthday
cake before, " he said solemnly as he
swallowed the last pink crumb of the
"5," "and this 's the first time I ever
even tasted angel. I would n't be sur-
prised if it went clear through and made
another fellow of me. Now, miss,
please pass some of it to the other
boys."
Even No. 6, after a moment's hesi-
tation, accepted a piece, and No. 9, hav-
ing eaten his, spent the rest of the af-
ternoon in writing a poem entitled The
Angel of the Prison.
A week later Nos. 4 and 5, having
served their ninety days' sentence for
drunkenness and disorderly conduct,
were dismissed, and the gray-haired
prisoner finished his term for vagrancy
soon after. Roxella found her midday
duties lightened. She was becoming
deeply interested in the political pris-
oner, who confided to her by degrees long
portions of his early history and blighted
career.
"My real name is Philip Cart-
wright," he whispered one day. "I
wanted you to know, though for politi-
cal reasons I am now bearing another.
It doesn't matter, since the rest of
my life will undoubtedly be passed in
prison. If I could only be brought to
trial all might yet be well. But my
enemies prevent that, knowing that my
innocence could soon be proved."
"I didn't know those things ever
happened outside of story books, " Rox-
ella assured him with distressed face.
No. 6 beckoned to her one day as she
passed his door. "It 's none of my af-
fair," he said kindly, "but I sh'd want
somebody to meddle if 'twas a sister
of mine. I 'm no hand to talk about
my neighbors, and I wouldn't for the
world carry tales to Peterson Thomas
as mebbe I ought to do, but I want to
advise you as a wellwisher not to go
too far with any of us fellows in here,
or to take too much stock in what we
say. Our judgment gets warped till
we think too well of ourselves and too
little of other folks, and we ain't to be
trusted. I would n't listen to that fel-
low in No. 9 quite so long to a time,
if I was you."
Roxella' s cheeks blazed. "That 's
about what I should have expected from
you," she said with indignation. "If
I want advice, thank you, I can get it
outside the jail."
Next day she defiantly spent a full
half hour in conversation with No. 9.
The political prisoner was looking ill
from his long confinement. "I am
wasting for want of sunshine and fresh
air," he reluctantly admitted when
Roxella anxiously remarked upon his
failing health. " Roxella, would it not
be possible for you to grant me a brief
hour in the open air, sometimes? It
would be perfectly safe. The wall is
far too high for me to scale in my weak
condition even were other bonds than
my word necessary. Let me have an
hour there with you in the moonlight,
since sunlight is no more for me."
Roxella assented eagerly. "It 's
just what you need," she declared.
"I'll ask Sheriff Thomas this very
night."
He stopped her sadly. "That is
worse than useless, " he said. " It would
only end in depriving me of the one
pleasure left in life — your visits. No,
if you do not pity me enough to grant
this little boon without the knowledge
of any one, I must still languish here."
For a week Roxella held firm against
pleading and reproaches, while No. 9
grew paler and weaker each day. Then
she yielded.
"Broad daylight 's the best time,"
she said shortly. "Sheriff's gone all
day, and Mis' Thomas's room is on the
78
Roxella's Prisoner.
front. You '11 give me your word of
honor to come back when the hour is
up ? " He cast a reproachful look upon
her. "This — f rom you, Roxella, " he
said weakly.
He drew in deep breaths of the sum-
mer air as they sat in the shadow of the
south wall upon a long bench. A huge
elm tree drooped its branches from the
other side, and fragrant odors of sum-
mer floated about them. "Oh, to be
free again and go my way unhindered
— with you beside me, " he sighed.
Roxella rose hastily. "The kitchen
clock 's striking four, " she announced.
She locked the door of No. 9 upon
him once more, and went back to pre-
parations for the evening meal with
troubled face. "It 's nothing short of
unfaithfulness to them that trust me,"
she acknowledged to her conscience.
"I 'm choosin' a wrong course deliber-
ately rather than see a fellow bein'
who is really innocent waste away be-
fore my eyes."
The following day was rainy, but
Roxella and her charge walked for an
hour up and down the gravel walk be-
neath a large umbrella.
"Even the rain is a blessed privilege
— with you," he whispered.
On the fourth day, as they sat again
beneath the wall, the prisoner leaned
suddenly toward his jailer. "Dear-
est " — he began, but Roxella shrank
away. "Don't! " she commanded.
A sudden push sent her headlong
upon the soft grass. Half stunned she
scrambled to her feet, to find her pris-
oner scaling the high wall in a manner
which indicated both strength and agil-
ity. Already his hands were grasping
the very top. In Roxella 's bewildered
brain there was room for but one
thought, — her responsibility to Ever-
green County. She flung herself against
the wall, grasping his right foot with
desperate energy, while the other flour-
ished wildly about her head, and threats
of dire vengeance all unheeded floated
down to her from the top of the wall.
" Help — help — help ! " screamed
Roxella, though hopeless of aid ; for
Sheriff Thomas and his farm hands
were two good miles away.
A well-aimed kick struck the top of
her head. Roxella felt her brain reel
and her grasp weaken. He would es-
cape, and she had betrayed the trust of
Evergreen County. Her hands weakly
slipped from their hold, but a pair of
strong arms reaching above her head
pulled the escaping prisoner to the
ground.
"You contemptible villain! " cried
the indignant voice of No. 6. "I don't
see why I didn't stop you before you
got this fur."
He marched the recaptured prisoner
back to his cell, delivering upon the
way sundry pungent bits of advice and
warning, while Roxella, with aching
head and deep humiliation of spirit,
followed with the political prisoner's
hat.
"How 'd you get out? " she ques-
tioned of No. 6 as they locked their
prisoner in once more.
"I ain't ever been locked in," re-
plied No. 6 lightly. "Pete Thomas
said he couldn't help my bein' fool
enough to come here, since that was a
matter between me and my own brains
or the lack of 'em, but he swore he
would n't never turn a key on me, and
he hasn't." He turned to Roxella.
"What did you s'pose I was here
for? " he asked. "No, I ain't goin' in
again. My time was up two days ago,
but I made a bogus excuse to Pete and
hung on here to watch that fellow. I
knew he was up to something of this
kind, and I 'd ought to stopped him
sooner. What 'd you say you thought
I was here for? "
He laughed shortly at Roxella 's fal-
tered confession.
"That's Hi Risley in No. 9," he
said with some sarcasm. "Mighty slick
talker, ain't he? "
Roxella, sitting down in the side
doorway of the white house, subsided
Some Nineteenth- Century Americans.
79
into a flood of emotion. No. 6's sar-
castic tone changed instantly.
"Oh, come now, little girl, don't take
it that way," he pleaded. '"T ain't
any wonder after all. Hi 's the slick-
est liar I ever saw, and he 's fooled
many a shrewd man who had long ex-
perience in the art himself. Why
should n't he take in a tender-hearted
little woman, who, bein' the soul of
truth herself, has a right to expect it in
other folks ? That interestin' paleness
of his was chalk, and them circles
round his eyes black lead. More or
less of it got rubbed off in rescuing
him, but he '11 have it on again before
he goes before a jury. There, there,
never mind. He ain't worth sheddin'
a tear over. But with all his lyin'
propensities there never was truer words
spoke than those poetry pieces he wrote
off about sunshine and angels gettin'
into the jail."
"I wouldn't never believed it of a
Hodges, Roxelly, " said Sheriff Thomas
in a reproachful tone as he listened to
Roxella' s confession. "I 'm terri-
bly disappointed. But there, as Tom
Leslie says, it wa'n't any more than
natural for one so innocent and trustin'
to be taken in, and I 've a strong sus-
picion your father 'd say I was the one
to blame. Anyhow, Tom made me
promise I would n't blame you, so we
won't say no more about it. Court
sets next week, and we '11 soon be rid of
this blot on a respectable institution."
"Mr. Sheriff," questioned Roxella
a few moments later, "who is No. 6,
and what was he here for? "
"That," replied Peterson Thomas
with satisfaction, "was Tom Leslie.
He 's been one of my best deputies for
years, for all he 's a young feller. And
he 's jest served a term of sixty days
for contempt of Court in refusin' to
testify against a neighbor, and send him
to jail away from his dyin' wife and
little children. It ought to been set-
tled by a fine, but Tom and the Court
was both stuffy, though the judge says
to me afterwards, says he, ' Every inch
of that fellow's six feet is clear man,'
says he. And that 's the truth. You 've
done well for yourself, Roxelly, and
your father, who knows the Leslies,
won't find no fault with me on that
ground."
"But it 's not — I did n't — I have
n't done anything," protested Roxella
with burning cheeks.
"You wait and see," replied Sheriff
Thomas in prophetic tones.
Harriet A. Nash.
SOME NINETEENTH-CENTURY AMERICANS.
THE books on the biographical shelf
of any library stand a double chance of
interesting the reader to whom no human
thing is foreign. They are like all other
books in that the writers must give their
own flavor, more or less individual, to
each. They are unlike the rest of the
library in that the theme of each is in-
evitably that most human of themes, — a
person and his life, with all that is im-
plied in the contact of one life with oth-
ers. It may almost be said that a dou-
ble stupidity is required to make a bio-
graphy dull, — a stupidity enveloping
both the writer and his theme. There
are widely varying degrees of interest in
the things to be revealed in different bio-
graphies, even as biographers display a
wide diversity of cunning and power in
making the most of their opportunities.
Yet the stars do not often conjoin so
malignly as to permit a complete disap-
pointment both in theme and in treat-
ment. Certainly the titles and the au-
80
Some Nineteenth- Century Americans.
thorship of a few of the new accessions
to the shelf of biography bear with them
a promise of which at least a partial ful-
fillment is assured.
It has become the fashion amongst
biographers to let a man speak as volu-
bly as possible for himself — through
letters, diaries, and quotations from his
published works. When the biographer
is essentially less interesting than his
theme, this is a fortunate fashion. This
relation, however, does not always exist.
It may even happen at times that the
reader finds himself in the condition of
a guest at a dinner to which a delightful
host has asked him to meet a delightful
friend. The guest goes home disap-
pointed if the host has taken the role of
a mere prompter, asking those leading
questions which provide the links of con-
versation, and has contributed nothing
more himself. Our host, Mr. Henry
James, leaves no such regret with those
whom he has introduced to William Wet-
more Story and His Friends.1 His book
has grown from " a boxful of old papers,
personal records and relics all," which
was placed in his hands. In printing
these papers, chiefly letters, he has seized
every opportunity to let Story speak for
himself ; but, in the nature of the case,
the letters to Story outnumber those of
his own writing. From beginning to end
of the two volumes, moreover, Mr.
James supplies a generous contribution
of comment and interpretation, page af-
ter page of writing which could have
come from no pen but his own. The
reader is correspondingly grateful that
Mr. James has not followed blindly the
current fashion of biography, for besides
learning all that is told of Story and his
friends one gains a new and fuller ac-
quaintance with Mr. James himself.
The preliminary chapter, Precursors,
strikes the keynote of Mr. James's spe-
cial fitness for his task. His Precursors
1 William Wetmore Story and His Friends.
By HENRY JAMES. In two volumes. Boston
and New York : Houghton, Mifflin & Co. 1903.
are those first Americans of the nine-
teenth century who found their native
land barren of artistic promptings and
satisfactions, and sought in Europe what
they missed at home. The keen sympa-
thy of Mr. James with these pioneers
and their successors is repeatedly shown
forth. This, indeed, is quite as it should
be, for Story, with all his reasons for
feeling himself a true portion of the Bos-
ton and Cambridge community, mani-
festly suffered from something very like
homesickness when he revisited it. What
it all amounted to — as Mr. James him-
self has made bold to state the case —
" was that, with an alienated mind, he
found himself again steeped in a soci-
ety both fundamentally and superficially
bourgeois, the very type and model of
such a society, presenting it in the most
favorable, the most admirable, light ; so
that its very virtues irritated him, so that
its inability to be strenuous without pas-
sion, its cultivation of its serenity, its pre-
sentation of a surface on which it would
appear to him that the only ruffle was an
occasionally acuter spasm of the moral
sense, must have acted as a tacit re-
proach." Yet Mr. James indulges the
speculation that if Boston, and not Italy,
had been the home of Story, the poet
rather than the sculptor might have at-
tained the higher development in him.
The literary art, as the biographer sub-
tly argues, " has by no means all its ad-
vantages in the picturesque country. . . .
In London, in Boston, he would have
had to live with his conception, there be-
ing nothing else about him of the same
color and quality." In one way and an-
other, then, it is honestly made to appear
that Story paid the penalty of the absen-
tee. But the points at which the insight
of Mr. James has penetrated the less
evident significances of this theme are
quite too many to specify.
Of the letters at Mr. James's disposal,
those written by Story himself reveal
many winning qualities of a man with
rarely versatile powers. In none of them
Some Nineteenth- Century Americans.
81
does he stand forth more clearly than
when writing to the friends of longest as-
sociation, Lowell and Mr. Norton. Yet
he appears with but little loss of distinct-
ness in the letters which all his friends
wrote to him. One realizes him the more
clearly for finding Lowell at his own de-
lightful best in more than one of his char-
acteristic bits of fooling. It is only to a
man of a certain sort — none too familiar
— that Browning could have written as
he did in the great crisis that came to him
with the death of Mrs. Browning. Of
many other friends — such as Sumner,
Landor, Lord Lytton — there are char-
acteristic glimpses. Mr. James's image
of most of them as " ghosts " is forced per-
haps into a duty too constant and obvious.
In many passages of the biographer's
work there is of course much that is any-
thing but obvious. Humor, insight, deli-
cacy of perception and expression, —
these good things are so abundant that
one should not grow querulous over such
sentences as, " The ship of our friends
was, auspiciously — if not indeed, as
more promptly determinant of reactions,
ominously — the America, and they
passed Cape Race (oh the memory, as
through the wicked light of wild sea-
storms, of those old sick passings of Cape
Race !) on October 13th." This is not an
isolated example of what may be called
Mr. James's past-mastery of the English
sentence. These happily separated frag-
ments baffle and estrange one like pas-
sages from his later novels. Yet here
they may be taken — like the inadequate
index with which the volumes are
equipped — not too seriously ; for the
compensations are many. The total im-
pression of the volumes is that of a faithful
picture of a delightful man, period, and
group of personalities.
The fruits of sophistication and of sim-
plicity could hardly be contrasted more
strongly than in turning from Mr. James's
work to the record of Mr. J. T. Trow-
1 My Own Story. With Recollections of
Noted Persons. By JOHN TOWNSEND TBOW-
VOL. xcin. — NO. 555. 6
bridge's * fruitful years. In this volume,
witli which the readers of the Atlantic
have already had some opportunity to
familiarize themselves, subject and writer
are one. The Backwoods Boyhood which
Mr. Trowbridge describes, and his early
experiences of teaching and bread-win-
ning by various methods, provided as a
whole the most valuable training he could
have had for the work he was destined to
perform. In spite of the novels and
poems with which he has delighted his
maturer readers, it is of course as a
writer of stories for boys that he has
taken his securest hold upon the remem-
brance of his generation. It is the privi-
lege of maturity to exhibit toward what
has concerned the boyhood left behind
an attitude in which something patroniz-
ing, perhaps half apologetic, is found.
But with this is blended the peculiar ten-
derness which accompanies a sense of
proprietorship and early discovery. If
the boys who have not yet grown to man-
hood are doomed to lack a memory which
shall become a possession of this sort, so
much the worse for them. Their fathers
have had Mr. Trowbridge, and in his Own
Story many of them will find abundant
grounds for their allegiance to him.
The qualities in a writer upon which
the youthful reader is perhaps surest to
insist are those of directness and sanity.
These appear with rare distinctness in
Mr. Trowbridge's reminiscences. The
manner of the narrative is simplicity it-
self. It is all as modest as the writer
was when he spoke to Longf eUow " of his
being already a famous poet, a Cam-
bridge professor, a man representing the
highest culture, when I first came to
Boston with the odor of my native back-
woods still upon me, — without friends, or
academic acquirements, or advantages of
any sort ; — and of the feeling I could
never quite get over, of the immense
distance between us." Yet there is never
a trace of that false modesty which
BRIDGE. Boston and New York : Houghton,
Mifflin & Co. 1903.
82
Some Nineteenth- Century Americans.
sometimes becomes a distorting glass
when its possessor looks through its me-
dium upon surrounding objects and per-
sons. This seeing of things clearly —
the quality which appeals to boys — gives
a high value to the comments Mr. Trow-
bridge has made in the later chapters of
his book upon contemporary writers. To
Emerson his " spiritual indebtedness was
first and last the greatest," and he ac-
knowledges it generously. In writing of
Whitman, whom he knew well, he takes
the point of view which must ultimately
come to prevail — of separating wheat
from chaff, both in the man's character
and in his work. His powers are recog-
nized, and his limitations. His debt to
Emerson is recorded, apparently beyond
dispute. Against those later friends of
Whitman who maintain " that he wrote
his first Leaves of Grass before he had
read Emerson," Mr.Trowbridge squarely
arrays himself : " When they urge his
own authority for their contention, I can
only reply that he told me distinctly the
contrary, when his memory was fresher."
The handling of Alcott is as reverent
as one with Mr. Trowbridge's esteem of
Emerson's opinion would naturally make
it. Yet the pervading sanity of the rem-
iniscences incites the reader to draw
his own conclusions from the story of
Alcott on the Nantasket boat, compla-
cently accepting the "provision" which
he foresaw would be made for his fare,
and of the Conversation in which the
Sage ascribed to himself and Emerson
the " highest " temperament, and placed
his hearers, including Mr. Trowbridge,
far lower in the scale. By swelling the
list of just such anecdotes as these, Mr.
Trowbridge does his part in confirming
the justice of Professor Wendell's esti-
mate of " the extreme type of what
Yankee idealism could come to when un-
1 Recollections Personal and Literary. By
RICHARD HENRY STODDARD. Edited by
RIPLEY HLTCHCOCK, with an Introduction by
EDMUND CLARENCE STEDMAN. New York:
A. S. Barnes & Co. 1903.
hampered by humor or common-sense."
Indeed, there is hardly any one of whom
Mr. Trowbridge has written without
making a personality more definite. It
is even worth while to know that Long-
fellow after a conversation with Dr.
Holmes almost always suffered from a
headache. It is noteworthy, also, that the
author — as if to symbolize his habit of
getting at the reality of whatever he is
writing about — is fond of setting down
the stature of his friends in feet and
inches. The book, in a word, is one of
those valuable contributions to the know-
ledge of a period which are also to be
measured by the genuine pleasure they
bring to the reader.
The service of Mr. Trowbridge's boy-
hood in preparing him for his work in
the world is one of those things which
are easier to recognize when past than
they would have been in looking forward.
Yet the recognition is complete. The
two other autobiographies in the present
group of books provide instances of be-
ginnings from which it is even harder to
see how a poet l and a scientist 2 could
have emerged.
The New England childhood of Rich-
ard Henry Stoddard was of the somewhat
squalid, quite unlettered kind not often
recorded of real persons, for the simple
reason that few who have experienced it
have developed the power to conquer
their circumstances. Even of his mother-
who moved from one mill town to an-
other, and after his father's death married
a stevedore and drifted to New York,
the son cannot give an encouraging re-
port. His schooling was of the slender-
est, yet, with what he taught himself by
indomitable reading, it might have led to
something more germane to his later life
than the work in an iron foundry to
which he found himself committed at
2 Reminiscences of an Astronomer. By SIMON
NEWCOMB. Boston and New York : Houghton,
Mifflin & Co. 1903.
Some Nineteenth- Century Americans.
83
eighteen. After three years of this hard
labor there was a period of employment
by a carriage painter, and of the emer-
gence from this work into that of the
writer there is no more definite account
than the statement with which the story
of his courtship comes to a climax : " Be-
ing married, I set resolutely to work to
learn the only trade for which I seemed
fitted — literature." The rarely con-
genial life of the married poets, the good
and evil fortunes which they faced with
equal courage, the intimacies with such
men from the front rank of the second
order in letters as G. H. Boker, T. B.
Read, and Bayard Taylor, the frequent
glimpses of others with more abiding
claims to greatness, — these are the chief
themes of Mr. Stoddard's reminiscences.
Interesting as many of them are, they
fail as a whole to impress one with the
importance which would attach to a small
collection of the very best lyrics from the
published writings of Mr. and Mrs. Stod-
dard.
Of a type of boyhood quite as unfami-
liar in American annals as that of Mr.
Stoddard Professor Newcomb's Reminis-
cences afford a striking example. The
Canadian provinces have so far supplied
but few of our men of distinction. Yet
the picture of Nova Scotia in the fourth
and fifth decades of the century is drawn
against a background like that of the re-
moter parts of New England at an earlier
time. The anomaly of Professor New-
comb's formative period was his appren-
ticeship through the important years
between sixteen and eighteen to a quack
botanic doctor whose theory of life was
summed up in his declaration : " This
woi'ld is all a humbug, and the biggest
humbug is the best man. That 's the
Yankee doctrine, and that 's the reason
the Yankees get along so well." It was a
good augury for the future of the appren-
tice that this man and his theory filled
him with increasing disgust, which finally
expressed itself in just such a running
away to seek his fortunes as many a
writer of fiction has utilized as " mate-
rial " for his opening chapters. The
hero of the escape soon found himself in
those thickly trodden paths of school-
teaching which have so often led on to
eminence. On the avenues by which it
was reached — through work on the Nau-
tical Almanac, in the Naval Observatory
at Washington, in many important astro-
nomical undertakings — he came into
contact with many men of distinction in
the world of science. Of them, and of
the various scientific enterprises with
which Washington and the national gov-
ernment have had to do, Professor New-
comb has written with enthusiasm and a
contagious sympathy. To some readers
it will be a matter of surprise to find how
many of the names which are instantly
recognized as important mean less to the
uninstructed in scientific lore than cor-
responding, or even less important, names
in almost any of the arts would signify.
With the realization of this fact comes a
sense of the usefulness of Reminiscences
like these of Professor Newcomb's : they
will bring into the clearer light of recog-
nition some of the most valuable phases of
intellectual activity in America through
the generations which may now fairly be-
gin to be reminiscent.
The beginning and the long continu-
ance of Whittier's career are matters of
pi'ofuse and familiar record. One does
not look, therefore, for' many surprises
in the new attempts to picture his life.
It is more interesting to compare the
points of view of two writers who bring
to their task respectively the qualifica-
tions of the younger contemporary and
of the very much younger student who
belongs to a later generation.
Colonel Higginson's book 1 has already
been a year before the public. The per-
sonality of the writer finds expression in
it perhaps a little less freely than one
might wish. Like one without the ad-
1 John Greenleaf Whittier. By THOMAS
WENTWOHTH HIGGINSON. English Men of Let-
ters. New York : The Macmillan Co. 1902.
84
Some Nineteenth- Century Americans.
vantages of a contemporary, Colonel Hig-
ginson has availed himself freely of the
previous records of Whittier and his
times, not even eschewing his own good
story of the Atlantic Club dinner in
honor of Mrs. Stowe. But in addition
to his use of the more obvious sources, he
has drawn with advantage — as befits so
constant a champion of the sex — upon
the short sketches of Whittier by his
friends Mrs. Fields and Mrs. Claflin.
The passages from their little books con-
firm all one's impressions of the true sym-
pathy which existed between Whittier
and his feminine friends, and therefore
have even a greater biographic value than
that which appears on the surface. For
the light the volume throws upon the an-
ti-slavery period one welcomes especial-
ly such pages as those in which Colonel
Higginson discriminates between the vot-
ing and the non-voting abolitionists, and
shows how possible he himself found it
to work with both. It is because these
pages have so marked a value that the
reader finds himself regretting that there
are not more of them.
The writer of a later generation cannot
rely upon the aid of these personal re-
membrances. The necessity is therefore
laid upon him of putting to the best
possible use all the existing sources of in-
formation. Before Professor Carpenter's
book l was finished Colonel Higginson's
could be added to the list of authorities.
What he has done is not so much to draw
upon their pages for quotation — though
of course they must frequently be used
in this way — as to make them his own,
and to give forth in a fresh form their
essential elements. Professor Carpenter,
addressing the younger generation in its
own language, has accomplished this dif-
ficult task with uncommon success. He
has been fortunate, moreover, in securing
really important letters, not hitherto pub-
1 John Greenleaf Whittier. By GEORGE RICE
CARPENTER. American Men of Letters. Bos-
ton and New York : Houghton, Mifflin & Co.
1903.
lished, which passed between Whittier
and such men as John Quincy Adams,
Henry Clay, and William Lloyd Garri-
son. These, together with what appears
to be the justifiable emphasis laid upon
Whittier's reluctant celibacy, place cer-
tain pages of the book among the " origi-
nal sources " for future study. There is a
fresh value also in the author's discussion
of the anti-slavery question as it affected
not only Whittier, but all his fellow coun-
trymen. The book, from its very nature,
makes no attempt at the completeness
of the Lives and Letters which are sure
to follow the death of a great man. It
is merely an admirable specimen of those
products of a later day which give pos-
terity what it really wishes and needs to
know, and render the more voluminous
records necessary in the course of time
to special students only.
It has been said in England that the
supreme test of citizenship in the United
States is found in the record of a man's
relation to the civil war. Both Whit-
tier and Henry Ward Beecher were of
the generation to which the remark ap-
plies. A full third of Dr. Lyman Ab-
bott's new life of Beecher 2 deals with
the period which begins with the anti-
slavery agitation and ends with the prob-
lems of reconstruction. Beecher's part
in the great struggle of our national life
is set forth with a fullness and compre-
hension which make these pages — like
the. best of Colonel Higginson's and Pro-
fessor Carpenter's — a genuine addition
to the history of the period. The unique
service of Beecher to his country was —
as everybody knows — the series of
speeches in England which had so re-
markable an effect in bringing the British
middle and laboring classes into sym-
pathy with the Union cause. It was a
self-imposed duty undertaken with some
doubt regarding its wisdom. The
2 Henry Ward Beecher. By LYMAN ABBOTT.
Boston and New York : Houghton, Mifflin &
Co. 1903.
The Blue Color of the Sky.
85
speeches, but five in number, were de-
livered under circumstances of the utmost
physical difficulty. But their success,
first with the audiences that had to be
conquered, and then with a half-hostile
public, was one of the notable triumphs
of our heroic period ; and Dr. Abbott is
to be thanked for putting it so effective-
ly on record. For the rest of Beecher's
career — it is no easy task to write of
the most conspicuous member of the
family which inspired the remark that
mankind is divided into " the good, the
bad, and the Beechers." It would be
harder for most biographers than it has
been for Dr. Abbott, for, except in such
a chapter as the discreet and restrained
" Under Accusation," into which the
whole miserable Tilton business is com-
pressed, the author has permitted himself
the fluency of one whose constant prac-
tice has made it easy to expatiate on any
theme. Some condensation might there-
fore have been well. Yet the book
leaves a clear impression of an extraor-
dinary personality : — the preacher who,
using his text, as he said himself, as a
gate not to swing upon, but to push open
and go in, made his pulpit a living power ;
the editor, who observed no rules or
office hours, yet profoundly affected the
type of journalism with which he had to
do ; the writer and public speaker, of
persuasive wit and eloquence. The fig-
ure of Beecher could not be spared from
an American gallery of the last century,
and Dr. Abbott's picture bids fair to
stand as the authoritative portrait.
M. A. DeWolfeHowe.
THE BLUE COLOR OF THE SKY.
THE blue color of the sky on a clear
day is familiar to all. And yet how
many have considered the source of this
delicate mantle of azure which Nature
spreads over the dome of the heavens?
The beautiful tints of the sky are uni-
versally admired, and every one has wel-
comed with mental relief the break in
the clouds which gives a glimpse of
the firmament when gloom and darkness
have long hovered over the Earth. The
color of this blue naturally appears the
more striking when seen in immediate
contact with the clouds.
Probably our very familiarity with
the every-day appearance of the sky
diminishes our wonder at one of the
most exquisite colors in the physical
world, and for this reason we seldom in-
quire into its origin. It certainly is a
remarkable circumstance in the history
of the human mind that some of the
most obvious of natural phenomena,
which every one notices and no one
especially dwells upon, should have es-
caped the attention of philosophers to
such an extent that even now their
causes are not fully understood, while
other phenomena much more remote,
and having little connection with daily
life, excite such wonder that they have
long since been duly explained and
appreciated. These latter phenomena
obviously are cases where "distance
lends enchantment to the view," and
therefore after all are not so unnatural
as they at first appear.
It is undeniable that a singular charm
often attaches to objects remote from us
either in time or space, and a similar
mental attitude is frequently illustrated
in the history of the Physical Sciences.
This subtle psychological tendency
arises from a natural disposition to en-
dow those things which we see in the
distance, or learn of only by report,
with all the perfections of descriptive
language so framed as to convey the
salient qualities of interest, without the
imperfections usually revealed by per-
8G
The Blue Color of the Sky.
sonal contact and close observation.
The creations of the imagination are
more ideal than the works of Nature,
and we always see these remote objects
under the fascination of the imagina-
tion.
The blue color of the sky on a bright
clear day has been constantly noticed
by the individual from childhood. To
the primitive lay mind the azure tint
of the firmament is simply its natural
color. But our daily experience shows
that the visible dome of the heavens is
only an appearance, and Science teaches
us to inquire critically into the nature
of things. The cause of this color
viewed from a scientific standpoint has
been almost as elusive as the fabled
philosopher's stone, which during the
Middle Ages was for centuries an object
of profound research. The same may
be said of the familiar color of the deep-
blue sea, which has elicited the admira-
tion of dwellers on the ocean shores
from the earliest ages of mankind ; and
yet probably no great number of in-
dividuals have inquired into the cause
of this color.
Viewed from an artistic standpoint,
the ancient Greeks, who were so much
favored by auspicious influences both
human and divine, were especially for-
tunate in their location in a region of
the world where the color phenomena
of sea, sky, and mountains assume a
beauty not only unsurpassed but prob-
ably unapproached at any other point of
the terrestrial globe. These vivid im-
pressions of the Physical Universe, work-
ing upon the free minds of the most
gifted race of antiquity, turned their
idealizing tendency to Art, Poetry,
and Science, whence has come the most
beautiful language and literature in
history. The sea- faring Greeks beheld
daily the bluest of skies reflected in
dark blue seas beneath their feet ; and
at the distant horizon snow-capped
mountains of bluish purple appeared to
prop the firmament above the Earth like
the fabled Atlas of old. Admiration
for these wonders of nature finds expres-
sion in the gorgeous colors which they
bestowed on their temples in imitation
of the divine spirit pervading the world,
and which they worshiped in majestic
edifices of noble simplicity.
It was natural for the Greeks to
inquire into physical phenomena, so
far as the knowledge of the times per-
mitted, and nothing excited their won-
der and admiration more than the blue
canopy of the heavens, from which the
gods of Homer descended to their min-
istrations in the affairs of men. Indeed,
Zeus or Jupiter means the Father of the
Skies, the deity who presides over the
orderly and beautiful Cosmos. This
spirit is admirably conveyed by Kaul-
bach's justly celebrated painting in the
National Gallery at Berlin, where the
Greeks of the Homeric age are seen on
the seashore near an imposing temple,
mingling with the nymphs of the blue
sea. while the gods are ascending to
Heaven over the arches of a brilliant
rainbow which illuminates the sky, after
the manner of the token which God set
in the clouds as a sign of the everlasting
covenant made with Noah and all living
creatures after the Flood.
If the Physical Sciences had been de-
veloped in antiquity, it is safe to say
that the Greek spirit of devotion to all
that is artistic and beautiful in the Cos-
mos would have led them to inquire as
minutely into the colors of the sea and
sky as they did into those sublime rela-
tions of Art, Philosophy, and Mathe-
matical Science, which have filled sub-
sequent generations with admiration
and despair. Nothing could surpass
the artistic and aesthetic spirit of the age
of .ZEschylus and Sophocles, Phidias
and Praxiteles, Aristotle and Plato.
Yet astonishing as were the intel-
lectual creations of the Greeks, there
is no record of the scientific study of
the familiar color of the firmament.
Nor indeed could such study be expect-
ed, when we consider the infancy of the
sciences at that early epoch, and the
The Blue Color of the Sky.
87
amazing difficulties of the problem as
made known by the scientific methods
of our own age. We look therefore in
vain for a correct understanding of the
cause of the color of the sea and sky
among the ancients, not because artis-
tic appreciation or scientific ability was
lacking, but because the state of re-
search was then much too primitive to
fathom the depths of a problem at once
familiar and profound.
The color of the sky has to be stud-
ied in connection with the theory of
light, and as this was not well under-
stood by the ancients, we find scientific
theories of the colors of natural objects
only in modern times, chiefly since the
epoch of the great Newton.
The simple propagation of light in
right lines was well known to the an-
cients. Archimedes understood the
conic sections and the elementary theo-
ries of optics so well that by means of
reflecting mirrors of his own construc-
tion he was enabled to burn the ships of
the besieging Romans in the harbor of
Syracuse. The astronomer Ptolemy
clearly understood the reflection of light
from mirrors, and even recognized the
effects of atmospheric refraction upon
the light of the stars and planets. But
all the ancients thought the velocity of
light was infinite, or that it passed in-
stantaneously from one part of the earth
to another; and even in modern times
similar views continued to prevail
until the year 1675, when Roemer
discovered from irregularities in the
eclipses of Jupiter's satellites that light
is propagated across the Earth's orbit
in measurable time. This discovery is
one of the most fortunate in the annals
of history ; and yet when first announced
Roemer 's theory seemed so extraordi-
nary that for a time it was scarcely be-
lieved. The realization of Roemer's
observations of the satellites of Jupiter
depended upon the astronomical tele-
scope which Galileo had invented sixty-
five years before, and applied with such
revolutionary effect to the study of the
heavens. These discoveries opened up
new views of the nature of light, and
it subsequently came to be the subject
of profound philosophical research and
experimentation, especially by the illus-
trious Newton, who analyzed the spec-
trum in 1666, and during the next ten
years was much occupied with develop-
ing a theory of the colors of natural
bodies. These were the first strictly
scientific attempts to explain the color
of objects by principles deduced from
experimental research, in which the an-
cients had been singularly deficient.
Unfortunately, the novelty of the new
theory of colors gave rise to professional
jealousies which involved Sir Isaac New-
ton in disputes so bitter that he after-
wards regretted publishing his work.
He blamed his imprudence in parting
with so substantial a blessing as his
peace of mind to run after the shadow
of fame, and said if he got rid of certain
controversies with Linus he would bid
adieu to such experiments forever except
such as he did for his own satisfaction,
or left to come out after him. He de-
clared that " a man must either resolve
to put out nothing new, or make himself
a slave to defend it."
Before the memorable work of New-
ton some of the great Continental paint-
ers of the Renaissance had formed the-
ories of light and color based upon the
mixture of pigments ; and a few of them
naturally attempted to account for the
blue color of the sky. Leonardo da
Vinci, who had devoted much atten-
tion to the composition of colors in his
extensive artistic designs, conjectured
that the blue color of the sky was the
result of the mixing of the white sun-
light reflected from the upper layers of
the atmosphere with the intense black-
ness of space. Historically this is the
first explanation of the color of the sky
worthy of mention, and its simplicity
reminds one of the early speculations of
the Ionian philosophers that the world
is composed of the elements water, fire,
air, and earth. Though resembling the
88
The Blue Color of the Sky.
natural science of the primitive Greeks,
this explanation after all comes nearer
the modern theories than might be ex-
pected, for these declared that the blue
color of the sky is due to reflections
from very minute particles of oxygen
and nitrogen in the upper layers of the
atmosphere.
Before touching upon these recent
investigations it seems advisable to elu-
cidate the historical steps by which such
views were established. Newton's study
of the color of the sky was a part of
the brilliant optical experiments which
he finished about the year 1675. While
absorbed in these laborjs during the year
1666, the young philosopher admitted
a beam of sunlight into his chamber
through a small aperture in the win-
dow shutter. On passing it through a
triangular prism of glass he produced
the famous experiment of colors, lead-
ing at once to the solar spectrum ; and
when this spectrum was again passed
through a reversed prism he produced
white light. To a keen youth of twenty-
four these experiments opened a very
wide field of optical investigation, and
for the next ten years he was largely
occupied with researches into the nature
of light, and especially with investi-
gating the colors of thin films of trans-
parent bodies. He used soap bubbles
as the most practicable means of getting
films of water of the requisite thinness,
and studied the colcrs which they ex-
hibit.
It is well known that under the ac-
tion of gravity the water composing such
a thin shell tends to run down on all
sides, so that the walls of the bubble
grow thin at the top and thicken
toward the bottom. After a time the
bubble becomes so thin at the top that
further flow of water from this point can
hardly take place, and finally the bubble
bursts. But before this last stage is
reached a degree of thinness in the
walls of the bubble is attained, which
causes it to glow with brilliant irides-
cent colors. Newton noticed that on
top of the thin bubble illuminated by
white sky light a black spot is formed ;
with increase of thickness downward
from this point on all sides, a red band
next appears, then a blue one ; then,
again, red and blue, red and blue, and
so on; the colors showing more ex-
tremes of red and purple in the higher
orders. This blue band, which first ex-
pands outward from the black spot at
the top, and descends slowly with the
subsidence of the water, Newton called
the "blue of the first order; " and al-
though somewhat dingy, he judged it to
be of the same tint as the blue of the
sky-
Newton's theory of the colors of bod-
ies rests upon the iridescent effects pro-
duced by white light falling upon thin
plates of the given substances; and he
says the color will be the same when the
plates are cut up into infinitely thin
strips, and again cut crosswise into par-
ticles ; so that he explains the color of
powdered paint by referring it to the
color of plates of the same thickness as
the grains of powder.
Reasoning from analogy, he inferred
that the transparent globules in the air
were small particles of water, such as
a thin soap bubble would yield when cut
up into small particles. The following
passages from Newton's famous Treatise
on Optics, published in 1704, are of
interest : —
"If we consider the various phenom-
ena of the Atmosphere, we may observe
that when Vapors are first raised, they
hinder not the transparency of the Air,
being divided into parts too small to
cause any reflexion in their superficies.
But when in order to compose drops of
rain they begin to coalesce and consti-
tute globules of all intermediate sizes,
those globules, when they become of a
convenient size, reflect some colors and
transmit others, may constitute clouds
of various colours according to their
sizes. And I see not what can be ra-
tionally conceived in so transparent a
substance as water for the production of
The Blue Color of the Sky.
89
these colours, besides the various sizes
of its fluid and globular parcels. . . .
"The blue of the first order, though
very faint and little, may possibly be
the color of some substances ; and par-
ticularly the azure of the skys seems to
be of this order. For all vapors, when
they begin to condense and coalesce into
small parcels, become first of that big-
ness whereby such an azure must be re-
flected, before they can constitute clouds
of other colours. And so, this being the
colour which vapours begin to reflect, it
ought to be the colour of the finest and
most transparent skys in which vapours
are not arrived to that grossness requi-
site to reflect other colours, as we find
it by experience. "
Newton's explanation seemed so
plausible that for a long time it was
generally accepted as correct. But
since the discovery of the blue clouds
which Tyndall artificially produced in
the laboratory about a third of a cen-
tury ago, and Lord Rayleigh's subse-
quent mathematical investigations of the
reflection of light from small particles,
it has been replaced by the theory of
Tyndall as verified by Rayleigh, an ac-
count of which will be given below.
Before taking up this recent work it
may be remarked that the French phy-
sicist Mariotte about 1675 adopted
the naturalistic .view that it is an in-
herent quality of the sky to reflect blue
light. Under the influence of this
opinion the great Euler in 1762
wrote : " It is more probable that all
the particles of the air should have a
faintly bluish cast, but so very faint as
to be imperceptible, until presented in
a prodigious mass, such as the whole
extent of the atmosphere, than that
this color is to be ascribed to vapors
floating in the air, which do not pertain
to it. In fact the purer the air is, and
the more purged from exhalation, the
brighter is the lustre of heaven's azure,
which is sufficient proof that we must
look for the cause of it in the nature of
the particles of the air. "
Sir John Herschel about 1830 still
adhered to Newton's original view that
the color of the sky is a blue of the first
order, and he made extensive use of
this theory. When Clausius in 1847 at-
tempted to test Newton's theory math-
ematically, he reached the conclusion
that if the heavenly bodies are to ap-
pear sharply defined through such a
medium the particles of water in the
air must have the form of thin shells or
hollow spheres, whose parallel surface
would not greatly refract the waves of
light, but, when the bubbles are suffi-
ciently thin, would yet reflect the blue
of the first order. This singular doc-
trine of vesicular vapor did not origi-
nate with Clausius, but had come down
from the speculative age of Leibnitz
and Descartes ; in recent years it has
been entirely abandoned as having no
foundation in nature.
It was discovered by Arago in 1810,
and more fully established by the ob-
servations of Sir David Brewster about
1840, that blue sky light is always po-
larized in a plane passing through the
Sun, the point of the sky observed, and
the observer. According to the laws
of polarization of light by reflection, this
proved that the light of the sky is sun-
light reflected from solid particles in the
air. Moreover, the maximum polariza-
tion occurs in a great circle of the hea-
vens ninety degrees from the Sun. In
1853 the German physicist Brucke
showed that the light scattered by fine
particles in a turbid medium is blue,
and that the blue of the sky is in reality
much deeper than Newton had supposed,
being of at least the second or third
order.
In 1869 Tyndall showed by some
very beautiful experiments which have
since become famous that when the par-
ticles causing the turbidity are so ex-
ceedingly fine as to be invisible with a
powerful microscope, the scattered light
is not only a magnificent blue, but is
polarized in the plane of scattering, the
amount of the polarization being a max-
90
The Blue Color of the Sky.
imum at an angle of ninety degrees
with the incident light. The definition
of objects seen through this fine-grained
medium was found to be unimpaired by
the turbidity. Here for the first time
the physicist at work in the laboratory
had produced all the essential qualities
of blue sky light. Tyndall's experi-
ment was recognized as giving the key
to the problem which had wellnigh
proved the riddle of the ages.
Using a glass tube about a yard in
length and some three inches in diame-
ter containing air of one tenth the ordi-
nary density mixed with nitrite of bu-
tyl vapor, which is extremely volatile,
and then exposing the mixture to the
action of a concentrated beam of elec-
tric light which would pass almost un-
hindered through the . transparent ends
of the tube, Tyndall was enabled to pre-
cipitate the attenuated vapors in the
form of a blue cloud. This cloud is not
visible in ordinary daylight, and to be
seen must be surrounded with darkness,
the vapor alone being illuminated. The
blue cloud differs in many ways from the
finest ordinary clouds, and, in fact, oc-
cupies an intermediate position between
these clouds and true cloudless vapor.
By graduating the quality of vapor ad-
mitted into the tube, Tyndall found
that the precipitation may be obtained
of any desired degree of fineness, so that
particles could be produced sufficiently
coarse to be visible to the naked eye,
or so fine as to be hopelessly beyond the
reach of the most powerful microscope.
The light emitted by the blue cloud in
a direction perpendicular to the beam
of incident light was found to be com-
pletely polarized, and the polarization
was the more perfect the deeper the
blue of the cloud. Tyndall demon-
strated that the blue cloud would result
from particles of any kind provided
they are sufficiently fine, and the ana-
logy of the blue sky was so evident that
he concluded that the phenomenon of the
firmamental blue found definite expla-
nation in these experiments. He as-
sumed the existence of fine particles of
water in the higher regions of the air,
and his studies on the heat-retaining
power of aqueous vapor, which does not
extend very high above the Earth, led
him to think that these particles are in a
solid state, owing to the intense cold to
which they are exposed in the rare me-
dium of oxygen and nitrogen composing
the upper layers of the atmosphere.
In these experiments Tyndall felt
confident that "particles might be pre-
cipitated whose diameters constitute but
a very small fraction of the wave length
of violet light.1 . . . In all cases, and
with all substances, the cloud formed
at the commencement, when the precip-
itated particles are sufficiently fine, is
blue, and it can be made to display a
color rivaling that of the purest Italian
sky." On account of certain difficulties
incident to the use of aqueous vapor at
the pressure and temperature desirable
in these experiments, he made no actual
use of water in any form; yet he says:
" That water-particles, if they could be
obtained in this exceedingly fine state
of division, would produce the same
effects, does not admit of reasonable
doubt. . . . Any particles, if small
enough, will produce both the color and
polarization of the sky. But is the exist-
ence of small water-particles, on a hot
summer's day, in the Jiigher regions of
our atmosphere, inconceivable ? It is to
be remembered that the oxygen and ni-
trogen of the air behave as a vacuum to
radiant heat, the exceedingly attenuated
vapors of the higher atmosphere being
therefore in practical contact with the
cold of space."
Tyndall concludes his theory of the
color of the sky thus : " Suppose the at-
mosphere surrounded by an envelope
impervious to light, but with an aper-
ture on the sunward side, through which
a parallel beam of solar light could enter
and traverse the atmosphere. Sur-
rounded on all sides by air not directly
1 Which is about one sixty -thousandth of an
inch.
The Blue Color of the Sky.
91
illuminated, the track of such a beam
would resemble that of a parallel beam
of the electric light through an incipient
cloud. The sunbeam would be blue, and
it would discharge light laterally in the
same condition as that discharged by
the incipient cloud. The azure revealed
by such a beam would be to all intents
and purposes a ' blue cloud.' '
Lord Rayleigh's profound mathemat-
ical investigations prove that when white
light is transmitted through a cloud of
particles small in comparison with the
cube of the shortest wave length, the
light scattered laterally is polarized in
the plane of scattering, the maximum of
polarization is ninety degrees from the
incident light, and the intensity of the
scattered light varies inversely as the
fourth power of the wave length. This
result takes no account of light which
has undergone more than a single scat-
tering. All the facts brought out by
Lord Rayleigh have been shown to agree
with phenomena observed in the labora-
tory when light is passed through turbid
media ; and very recently this illustrious
physicist has shown that about one third
of the total intensity of the blue light
of the sky may be accounted for by the
scattering due to the molecules of oxy-
gen and nitrogen in the air, entirely in-
dependent of the dust and aqueous vapor
which assume great importance in the
lower layers of the atmosphere. Solid
particles of water, ozone, and very fine
aggregations of oxygen and nitrogen
condensed under the intense cold pre-
vailing in the upper regions of the at-
mosphere enable us to account for the
rest of the sky light in accordance with
Rayleigh's mathematical theory.
It is worthy of remark that but for
the brightness of the sky the stars could
be seen in daylight. Even as matters
stand, some of the brighter of them have
been seen after sunrise by explorers in
high mountains, where the air is very
clear and the sky dark blue. If we
could go above the atmosphere the sky
would appear perfectly black, and stars
would be visible right close up to the
Sun. Astronomers observe bright stars
in daytime by using long focus tele-
scopes, the dark tubes of which cut off
the side light ; and persons in the bot-
toms of deep wells have noticed stars
passing overhead, the side light being
reduced by the great depths of the
wells.
The sky is bluer in the zenith than
elsewhere, because the path traversed
by scattered light is here the shortest,
so that it appears with less admixture
of white light reflected from haze and
water vapor, and less absorption of blue
light in the same watery envelope.
Near the horizon, where the path trav-
ersed by the light reflected from the
Sun is very long, there should be a great
increase in the whiteness of the back-
ground, and this is fully verified by ex-
perience. The sky is generally more
or less milky near the horizon, and if
it assumes a perfectly blue color it is
usually just after a heavy rain. At
this time all the dust is washed out of
the air and the watery haze has been
precipitated. Even then the blue re-
mains deepest in the zenith, for the rea-
sons above mentioned.
In the average condition of the sky
the haze is usually sufficiently prevalent
to render our sunsets and sunrises yel-
lowish or reddish. This is due mainly
to selective absorption of the blue rays
by water vapor, smoke, and dust in the
air. The existence of this selective ab-
sorption is a fortunate circumstance for
painters, poets, and writers, who have
used these beautiful and familiar adorn-
ments of Nature to fascinate the minds
and charm the imaginations of mankind
in all ages.
The study of the polarization and
color of the sky viewed scientifically is
very useful to meteorologists, as indi-
cating the size and kind of condensation
taking place in the atmosphere. Con-
siderable observational data on these
points have been collected in the past
by Sir David Brewster and Professor
92
The Blue Color of the Sky.
James D. Forbes, and by the Swedish
physicist Rubenson, but a vastly greater
work is being done now by the scientists
of the United States Weather Bureau in
supplying valuable observations for the
future study of the atmosphere.
The great aerial ocean over our heads
is made up of an infinite multitude of
moving currents and streams of varying
density and temperature, all in process
of continued change and adjustment due
to the heating of the atmosphere by the
Sun during the day and cooling by ra-
diation at night. The atmosphere is
full of little waves or streaming masses
of air somewhat resembling the ripples
in a shallow stream of water flowing
over gravel. And if the astronomer
will point his telescope on a bright star
and remove the eye-piece, so as to look
directly upon the object-glass illumi-
nated by the light of the star, he may
see these streaming currents dancing in
all their complexity. It is these little
waves in the air which cause the twin-
kling of the fixed stars. As the waves
are passing before our eyes they act
like prisms, deflecting the light first this
way and then that, producing flashes
of the spectral colors and sometimes
almost extinguishing the stars, so that
momentarily they appear to go out. In
high dry countries where the atmosphere
is quiescent these waves are greatly di-
minished in importance; and astrono-
mers have noticed that in such localities
the scintillation of the stars almost
ceases. There the air is quite free from
agitating currents, and the astronomers
can make good observations. At pre-
sent such regions are known chiefly in
Peru, and in the high dry plateaus of
the southwestern part of the United
States.
Having thus penetrated the cause of
the blue color of the sky, it is not a very
great leap to infer that a similar expla-
nation holds for the color of the ocean,
which next to the sky offers to our
senses the most attractive tints of the
great objects in nature. The saline and
other mineral substances dissolved in
the waters of the sea may be looked
upon as infinitely small particles in a
turbid medium ; and these should reflect
the sunlight and give a bluish green ap-
pearance to the ocean, just such as we
observe. For the salts are not in chemi-
cal combination with the water, but
merely dissolved in the medium, and
thus constitute an infinitely fine mixture
of molecules and particles suspended in
a colorless fluid. The light of the Sun
penetrates the ocean to a considerable
depth before all the reflections are pro-
duced, and the depth of this layer is
such that some of the shorter waves of
blue are absorbed, while the slightly
longer waves of green are transmitted.
This accounts for the appearance of the
well-known greenish tinge in the color
of the ocean.
If the sea water is full of air bub-
bles, as in the neighborhood of breakers,
or when turning violently before a mov-
ing ship, the light reflected from the
surface of these bubbles suffers a double
absorption by the water before it reaches
the eye, thus producing some of the
exquisite colors of the sea. Near the
shore, or in shoal water, another cause
sometimes comes into play, namely, fine
solid particles suspended in the water.
Such particles, whether in air or in
water, if sufficiently small, may produce
colors due to their minuteness alone, as
we have seen in the experiments of
Tyndall. If the particles are somewhat
coarser, like fine grains of soil washed
down in the erosion of rivers, they may
give the water a muddy appearance, as
in the China Sea ; while again, if exces-
sively minute, they may produce the deep
blue seen in the West Indies and the
equatorial Pacific. Extremely minute
animalculse, both living and dead, are
said to affect the color of the sea water
in many places. Owing to the suspen-
sion of such mineral matter in the
waters of the ocean, they are not pene-
trable by the Sun's rays to any very
great depth. After a depth of a few
The Blue Color of the Sky.
93
hundred fathoms has been attained, the
darkness becomes so great that attempts
at submarine photography have to be
made by artificial electric light sent
down for the purpose. And sea animals
of all kinds living in the bottom of the
ocean are wrapt in perpetual night of
such blackness that Nature has bene-
ficently provided them with phosphor-
escent powers for illuminating their
surroundings, not unlike the common
bull's-eye lamp so frequently used for
exploring dark corners. The phosphor-
escent lamps of the denizens of the deep
sea serve for the explorations needed in
their daily life, and also for gratifying
the sense of color, which is preserved
and even highly developed among ani-
mals dwelling in the total darkness of
the uttermost abysses of the ocean.
The beauty of pictorial works of Art
dealing with ocean scenery depends very
largely upon the magnificent coloring of
the background ; and here, as in the case
of the aerial ocean over our heads, the
color is due to reflection of light by small
particles suspended in the fluid medium.
According to Helmholtz, the blueness
of the eyes is also due to the action of
suspended particles. The "dark blue
sea " of Homer, and the endless variety
of allusions to the color of the ocean in
the literature of all ages, thus find a cu-
rious and instructive explanation in the
light of modern Science.
Let us now consider how the theory of
Tyndall and Rayleigh works when the
lower strata of the atmosphere are filled
with dust and water vapor in its various
forms. It is well known that but lit-
tle water vapor ascends to a very great
height above the Earth's surface. The
temperature decreases so rapidly as we
ascend, that at a height of 29,000
feet the thermometer falls to sixteen
degrees below zero centigrade, as was
observed by the English aeronauts
Glaisher and Coxwell in 1862. At this
height the color of the sky was noticed
to be "an exceedingly deep Prussian
blue, " and the air was "almost deprived
of moisture. " In an ascent to the height
of 23,000 feet made at Paris in 1804
Gay-Lussac found the temperature nine
degrees below zero centigrade, and the
dryness of the air so extreme that hy-
grornetric substances such as paper and
parchment became dried and crumpled,
as if they had been near a fire. At this
great height he noticed that the sky had
a dark blue tint, and that the absolute
silence prevailing was impressive. Most
of the moisture in the atmosphere had
been left behind before the balloon
entered the rare abode of the cirrus
clouds, which surround the tops of our
highest mountains.
In high altitudes in the Rocky Moun-
tains, the Andes, and the Alps, travel-
ers notice the striking blueness of the
sky, and the rarity and dryness of the
atmosphere. The writer recalls very
vividly the blue aspect of the sky as
seen from the top of the San Francisco
Mountains in Arizona, which have an
altitude of 13,000 feet above the sea;
and in an ascent of Popocatepetl to a
height of 16,000 feet the sky also ap-
peared deep blue. The same color was
noticed at other points of the Rocky
Mountains and in the Alps of Switzer-
land, where the contrast between the
blue of the sky and white snow on the
mountain peaks appeared so striking as
to attract the instant notice of the
thoughtful observer. Similar phenom-
ena have been noticed by travelers who
have explored high mountains in all
parts of the globe, and theory and obser-
vation agree in indicating that water
vapor is confined mainly to the lower
part of the atmosphere, though in the
form of cirrus clouds the height has been
shown occasionally to exceed ten miles.
At this height the water of course is
frozen, and the clouds are made up of
crystals of ice and snow.
One of the simplest means of verify-
ing these views, that the water vapor
and dust of the air are confined to the
layers within a few miles of the sea
level, is to notice the shadows cast by
94
The, Blue Color of the Sky.
heavy clouds on mountains at the set-
ting or rising of the Sun. The great
beams which spread out fanlike from
the setting Sun teach us a great deal
about the atmosphere. We always see
a blue streak where the clouds or moun-
tains cast a shadow ; while the sur-
rounding region of the sunset sky is
whitish, golden, purple, or even red-
dish, and sometimes the colors are
amazingly brilliant. Thunder clouds
seldom exceed the height of five miles,
and yet the shadows cast by them at the
time of sunset are conspicuously blue.
The blue color of the shadow indicates
that the predominant part of the blue
light of the sky originates at great
height, while the whitish, yellow, and
reddish colors are confined to the lower
strata of the air. The persistence of
the blue color for more than an hour
after sunset, when the sky light is re-
flected from illuminated particles in the
rare medium more than one hundred
miles above the Earth's surface, also
strengthens this view. In the spaces
intervening between the blue beams the
lower layers of the atmosphere are di-
rectly illuminated by the Sun, and re-
produce Homer's "rosy -fingered dawn. "
This color is due to the absorption of
blue light in the denser and more tur-
bid medium of the lower air, through
which only the longer waves, as the yel-
low, 'orange, and red, can be freely
transmitted.
It was this gorgeous aspect of the
rising Sun, casting shadows from the
clouds and mountains of Greece against
a sky naturally rich in color, which gave
the Greek poets their elegant concep-
tions of the dawn. The sun-god Apollo,
worshiped at Delphi, without doubt owes
much of his mystery and impressiveness
to the towering mountains which sur-
round the seat of the ancient oracle.
Nothing could be more majestic than
mountains like Parnassus, to the east
of Delphi, from which the morning sun
looks down into the precipitous gorges in
front of that famous temple. The Sun
emerges suddenly from his hiding be-
hind overhanging peaks, and is seen ra-
diating with all brilliancy in a sky of
the deepest blue. The natural color of
the Greek landscape combined with the
gorgeous phenomena of the rising Sun
bursting upon a scene where shadows
from mountains and clouds fill the air
with luminous beams of purple and
azure, without doubt accounts for much
of the glory of Apollo at the Temple
of Delphi. As seen by the art-loving
Greeks of the primitive ages nothing
could be more beautiful or more impres-
sive than this grand natural spectacle,
which we now explain by the reflection
of light from myriads of minute parti-
cles suspended in the atmosphere. Most
of the deep sky blue comes from ex-
cessively minute particles at a great
height ; while the " rosy-fingered dawn "
arises from aqueous vapor, and haze,
and innumerable particles of smoke and
dust floating near the earth.
Those who have visited Egypt, where
the atmosphere is usually clear, and so
free from clouds that the annual rain-
fall is only tan inch and a half, have
been impressed by the absence of a pure
deep blue sky. The vault of the firma-
ment appears rather whitish, or muddy,
due of course to the absorption of the
blue by dust diffused from the dry re-
gions of Sahara. While the Egyptian
sky is very bright, the white light is so
pronounced that the blue does not ap-
pear particularly attractive. The skies
of Italy and the Alps, on the other
hand, frequently are clear blue. Of all
the places which the writer has visited
Greece has the purest and deepest blue
sky. The color frequently is so strik-
ing that one does not wonder at even
the most vivid descriptions in Greek
literature. While traveling in Greece
during the spring of 1891 the writer
took particular occasion to notice the
color of the sky, sea, and mountains.
The atmospheric colors are much the
most brilliant known in any part of the
world. The mountains of Greece seen
Laura Bridgman.
95
at a distance of more than ten miles
appear of deep indigo blue tinged with a
delicate purple of inexpressible beauty.
The admirable paintings in the Na-
tional Museum at Berlin, representing
restorations of various places of clas-
sic celebrity, as Athens, Olympia, and
Syracuse, convey this rich coloring of
bluish purple in great vividness, but are
not in the least degree overdrawn. They
are among the most beautiful paintings
in the world, and eminent scholars have
regretted that they are not extensively
reproduced.
It is probable that the climate of
Greece, from a combination of several
natural causes, is such that the atmos-
pheric reflection and absorption be-
come especially pronounced. And as
this sky was evidently the same in clas-
sic antiquity as it is to-day, this color
phenomenon affords an interesting proof
of the unchanging climatic conditions
of that part of our globe during the last
two thousand years.
In most parts of the United States
our skies are whitened by water vapor,
haze, and dust; and we usually see the
deepest blue just after rainy days, when
the haze and moisture have been pre-
cipitated, and the particles of dust
washed out of the atmosphere by the
falling rains.
It is perhaps fortunate, from an
aesthetic point of view, that the appear-
ance of the sky varies so much as it
does. The infinite varieties of color
which it affords when so delicately
frescoed with clouds of all forms and
of all shades of color and intensity, com-
bined with vegetable and mineral hues
upon the land, whether in the green of
spring, the smoky blue of Indian Sum-
mer, the purple of autumn, or the white-
ness of winter, yield in due succession
a constant mental relief, and have in-
spired most of the exquisite delineations
of Nature in pictorial Art as well as in
Literature. The soft hues with which
the land is clothed give to the whole as-
pect of the world a lifelike appearance,
and the light of the Sun reflected from
the blue sky and luminous clouds fills the
whole scene with such vivid radiation,
that the Universe becomes to a modern
student as truly an inspiration as the or-
derly and beautiful Cosmos was to the
primitive Greeks. As Goethe says : —
" Angels are strengthen' d by the sight,
Though fathom thee no angel may ;
Thy works still shine with splendour bright,
As on Creation's primal day."
Now that Science has at length added
her share to these pleasurable contem-
plations by showing the causes from
which the inspirations of the mind have
sprung, the result of explaining the
color of the sea and sky, phenomena
often considered almost obvious and yet
for long ages wholly obscure, may be
ranked among the most gratifying tri-
umphs of the human mind.
T. J. J. See.
LAURA BRIDGMAN.
THE world changes, and the minds
of men. Helen Keller outstrips Laura
Bridgman,1 as Rudyard Kipling out-
strips Maria Edgeworth. Will Helen
herself appear quaint and old-fashioned
fifty years hence, to a generation spoiled
1 Laura Bridgman. Dr. Howe's Famous Pu-
pil and what He taught Her. By MAUD HOWE
by some still more daring recipient of its
sympathy and wonder ? We can answer
such a question as little as Dr. Howe
could have answered it fifty years ago ;
for the high-water mark of one age in
every line of its prowess always seems
and FLORENCE HOWE HALL. Boston : Little,
Brown & Co. 1903.
96
Laura Bridgman.
" the limit," — at any rate the only limit
positively imaginable to those who are
living, — and just what form and what
direction Evolution will strike into when
she takes her next step into novelty is
ever a seci'et till the step is made.
Laura was the limit in her day. The
child of seven was dumb and blind and
almost without the sense of smell, with
no plaything but an old boot which served
for a doll, and with so little education in
affection that she had never been taught
to kiss. She was sternly handled at home,
and was irascible and an object of fear
and pity to all but one of the village
neighbors, and that one was half-witted.
The way in which she became in a few
years, through Dr. Howe's devotion, an
educated girl, delicate-mannered, spirit-
ual-minded, and sweet-tempered, seemed
such a miracle of philanthropic achieve-
ment that the fame of it spread not only
over our country, but throughout Europe.
It was regarded as a work of edification,
a missionary feat. The Sunday-schools
all heard of Laura as a soul buried alive
but disentombed and brought into God's
sunlight by science and religion work-
ing hand in hand. The few other blind
deaf-mutes on whom attempts at rescue
had been made — Oliver Caswell, Julia
Brace, and others — were so inferior that
Laura's decidedly attenuated personality
stood for the extreme of richness attain-
able by humanity when its experience
was limited to the sense of touch alone.
Of such all-sided ambitions and curiosi-
ties, of such untrammeled soarings and
skimmings over the fields of language, of
such completeness of memory and easy
mastery of realities as Helen Keller has
shown us, no one then had a dream.
It is now indeed the age of Kipling
versus that of Edgeworth. Laura was
primarily regarded as a phenomenon of
conscience, almost a theological phenom-
enon. Helen is primarily a phenome-
non of vital exuberance. Life for her
is a series of adventures, rushed at with
enthusiasm and fun. For Laura it was
more like a series of such careful indoor
steps as a convalescent makes when the
bed days are over. Helen's age is that
of the scarehead and portrait be-spat-
tered newspaper. In Laura's time the
papers were featureless, and the public
found as much zest in exhibitions at in-
stitutions for the deaf and dumb as it
now finds in football games.
In contrast with the recklessly sensa-
tional terms in which everything nowa-
days expresses itself, there seems a sort
of white veil of primness spread over
this whole biography of Laura. All
those who figure in it bear the stamp of
conscience. Dr. Howe himself took his
educative task religiously. It was his
idea, as it was that of all the Amer-
ican liberals of his generation, that the
soul has intuitive religious faculties
which life will awaken, independently
of revelation. Laura's nature was in-
tensely moral, — almost morbidly so, in
fact, — and assimilated the conception
of a Divine Ruler with great facility ;
but it does not appear certain that such
an idea would have come to her spon-
taneously. She was easily converted
into revivalistic evangelicism at the age
of thirty-three, through communications
which her biographers deplore as having
perverted her originally optimistic faith.
Her spiritual accomplishments seem to
have been regarded rather as matters for
wonder by the public of her day. But,
granted a nature with a bent in the
spiritual direction, it is hard to imagine
conditions more favorable, to its develop-
ment than Laura's. Her immediate life,
once it was redeemed (as Dr. Howe re-
deemed it) from quasi-animality, was al-
most wholly one of conduct toward other
people. Her relations to " things," only
tactile at best, were for the most part
remote and hearsay and symbolic. Per-
sonal relations had to be her foreground,
— she had to think in terms almost ex-
clusively social and spiritual.
When she was twenty-two years old
her education was practically finished,
Laura Bridgman.
97
and she was sent to her parents' home
in New Hampshire. The withdrawal
of the personal attentions with which at
the Perkins Institution she had been
so lovingly surrounded, the loss of the
thousand communications which had fed
her mental being daily, came near cost-
ing the sensitive creature her life. At
the farm, mother, father, brothers, all
had engrossing occupations, and no one
could give time to the formidably tire-
some task of manual alphabet conver-
sation with Laura. She had to subsist
mainly on her internal resources. Julia
Brace would have turned over on her
face and gone to sleep like a dog. Laura
simply sickened unto death with moral
starvation. " On one occasion she be-
came so impatient with her mother for
not talking with her, that she struck her !
— and was immediately overcome with
despair at her action. She brooded over
it continually and would not be comfort-
ed. . . . Dr. Howe was summoned and
found her a shadow of herself, dying of
that subtle disease which we call home-
sickness." A friend, Miss Paddock, was
sent to bring her home. It was bitter
winter weather. When Miss Paddock
came to the girl's bedside " and spelt into
the nerveless hand these words : ' I have
come to take you home,' a wave of color
surged over the wan face. ' When do
we start ? ' whispered the thin fingers.
'As soon as you can eat an egg,' an-
swered the practical Paddock." Before
they had covered half the distance to
the railroad, Laura had fainted, but her
will never faltered. " To Boston ! to
Boston ! that cry had gone up night
and day from her homesick heart. . . .
And her fingers flew faster and faster as
the train brought her nearer. Would
Doctor meet them ? Was he glad she
was coming ? These two questions were
repeated endlessly." At last they ar-
rived, and in the warm and affectionate
human atmosphere of the institution she
soon recovered her vitality. It was an
exquisite case of purely moral nostalgia.
VOL. xcin. — NO. 555. 7
Laura never got a perfectly free use
of the English language. Her style in
writing was of a formality both quaint
and charming. From the History of
My Life, which she wrote at the age
of thirty, I cull a few examples, slips of
the pen and all, just as they were writ-
ten : —
" I was very full of mischief and fun.
I was in such high spirits generally. I
would cling to my Mother so wildly and
peevishly many times. I took hold of
her legs and arms as she strode across
the room. She acted so plain as if it
irritated her very much indeed. She
scolded me sternly. I could not help
feeling so cross and uneasy against her.
I did not know any better. I never was
taught to cultivate patience and mildness
and placid until I came away from my
blessed family at home. . . . Sometimes
I took possession of a small room in the
attic. I slept and sat there with some
of my dear friends. I observed many
different things in the garret, barrels con-
taining grain and rye etc. and bags filled
with flour wheat. I was very much
alarmed by not finding a banister on the
edge of the floor above the stairs. . . .
l( I loved to sport with the cat very
much. One morning I was sitting in
my little rocking chair before the fire.
I stretched out my hand toward the old
cat and drew her up to my side. I in-
dulged myself in having a game with her.
It was so cruel a sport for the poor liv-
ing being. I was extremely indiscreet
and ignorant. I rejected the poor crea-
ture into the hot fire. My Mother came
rushing suddenly and rescued the cat
from her danger. She seemed very im-
pulsive with the insent she shook and
slapped me most sternly for my commit-
ting a sin against her dear cat. She
punished me so severely that I could not
endure the effect of it for a long time.
She held two of the cat's paws up for me
to discerne the mark of the flame of fire.
My conscience told me at length that it
was truly very wicked in me to have done
98
Laura Bridgman.
a harm to her. It was very strange for
the cat to go with the greatest fearful
suspeetion. She concealed herself so
lucky some. The old cat never brought
her company to her oldest home since
she was banished from our sight. I can-
not ask her the reason why she never re-
traced her natural steps. I am positive
that it must be reality of her death now.
The favorite cat had not faith in us that
we should treat her more kindly and
tenderly again. . . .
" Once I set a chair by the fire place ;
I was trying to reach the shelf to search
for something. I drooped my central
gravity down and I scorched my stom-
ach so terribly that it effectually made
me very unwell and worrisome." ]
There are endless interesting traits,
some of them humanly touching, some
of them priceless to the psychologist,
scattered through this life of Laura. The
question immediately suggests itself,
Why was Laura so superior to other
deaf-mutes, and why is Helen Keller so
superior to Laura ? Since Galton first
drew attention to the subject, every one
knows that in some of us the material of
thought is mainly optical, in others audi-
tory, etc., and the classification of human
beings into the eye-minded, the ear-
minded, and the motor-minded, is fami-
liar. Of course if a person is born to be
eye-minded, blindness will maim his life
far more than if he is ear-minded origi-
nally. If ear-minded, deafness will maim
him most. If he be natively constructed
on a touch-minded or motor-minded plan,
he will lose less than the others from
either blindness or deafness. Touch-im-
ages and motor-images are the only terms
that subjects " congenitally " blind and
deaf can think in. It may be that Laura
and Helen were originally meant to be
more " tactile " and "motile " than their
less successful rivals in the race for edu-
cation, and that Helen, being more ex-
1 I take these extracts from Professor San-
ford's article on Laura Bridgman's writings, in
clusively motor-minded than any subject
yet met with, is the one least crippled by
the loss of her other senses.
But such comparisons are vague con-
jectures. What is not conjecture, but
fact, is the philosophical conclusion which
we are forced to draw from the cases
both of Laura and of Helen. Their entire
thinking goes on in tactile and motor
symbols. Of the glories of the world of
light and sound they have no inkling.
Their thought is confined to the pallid-
est verbal substitutes for the realities
which are its object. The mental ma-
terial of which it consists would be con-
sidered by the rest of us to be of the
deadliest insipidity. Nevertheless, life
is full of absorbing interest to each of
them, and in Helen's case thought is free
and abundant in quite exceptional mea-
sure. What clearer proof could we ask
of the fact that the relations among
things, far more than the things them-
selves, are what is intellectually inter-
esting, and that it makes little difference
what terms we think in, so long as the
relations maintain their character. All
sorts of terms can transport the mind
with equal delight, provided they be
woven into equally massive and far-reach-
ing schemes and systems of relationship.
They are then equivalent for intellectual
purposes, and for yielding intellectual
pleasure, for the schemes and systems
are what the mind finds interesting.
Laura's life should find a place in
every library. Dr. Howe's daughters
have executed it with tact and feeling.
No reader can fail to catch something of
Laura's own touching reverence for the
noble figure of " the Doctor." And if
the ruddier pages which record Helen's
exploits make the good Laura's image
seem just a little anaemic by contrast,
we cannot forget that there never could
have been a Helen Keller if there had
not been a Laura Bridgman.
William James.
the Overland Monthly for 1887. For some rea-
son they are omitted from the present volume.
The Richness of Poverty. — The New Hunting.
99
THE RICHNESS OF POVERTY.
GOD made nay spirit somewhat weak and small.
From rich satiety of joy I shrink :
The faintly fragrant wild-rose, faintly pink,
Better I love than garden beauties tall,
Deep-scented, with full-petaled coronal ;
Better the hillside brook wherefrom I drink
Than strong sweet wines; and best the twilight brink
And borderland of whatso holds me thrall.
But if life's pageantry is not for me,
And if I may not reach the mountains dim
That beckon on the blue horizon rim,
No disillusion hath mine eyes defiled,
And I shall enter Paradise heart-free,
With the fresh April wonder of a child.
M. Lennah.
THE NEW HUNTING.
THE good fairy evidently considered
that she had done enough for Tommy
when she gave him the eyes of a saint.
Either she considered soul an unimpor-
tant matter, or left it to some other of
the twelve invited fairies. The story of
the christening has never been told, but
it is barely possible that the thirteenth
godmother cut off Thomas's supply of
soul, or hampered its development in
some way or other. At any rate, there
is abundant room for this inference.
Fortunately for Tommy, however, a
deficiency in soul is not so conspicuous
as some mere physical imperfection, and
no one ever looked once at the dear little
fellow with his yellow hair fashionably
bobbed, and his sweet little face with
its great innocent black - fringed eyes,
without longing to take him up and kiss
him. And Tommy, even in trousers and
short hair and the Fifth Grade, was still
an angel so far as ocular expression was
concerned.
But if Tommy was lacking in soul,
Miss Laurel Petit, teacher of the Fifth
Grade, was oversupplied with it. Ever
since Miss Laurel began teaching, — and
her career may be fitly epitomized by
stating that she entered on her life-work
when programme was spelled with the
me and accented on the last syllable,
and had taught through program, pro-
gr'm, and back to programme again, —
she had been an ever-flowing fount of
soulf ulness in the arid desert of the three-
story brick schoolhouse in which she
presided over Grade 5A. Other teach-
ers complained of stupidity, of the odor
of onions and asafoetida bags worn to
keep off contagion, which hung about
certain classes, of supervisors, of new
methods, but through it all, Miss Laurel,
her head above the clouds, her sweet
blue eyes slightly rolled upward, her
plump form becomingly attired in dainty
stylish gowns, knew nothing of such dis-
comforts, but took fresh and ever-grow-
100
TJie New Hunting.
ing joy in the instruction of the infant
mind. For one reason, she ever found
her work more congenial. Leaders of
the new education had year by year
been refuting the axiom that there is no
royal route to learning. The corduroy
roads of her childhood had given place
to macadam pavements ; the birch rod
and the frown had been supplanted by
persuasion and the smile ; the once ugly
schoolroom had been beautified, and there
was a constantly increasing demand for
the instillation of soul into school work,
— the development of soul among the
children. " Remember that spirit is
more important than information ; " " in
beginning to teach birds, think more of
the pupil than of ornithology ; " " nature
study is not facts, it is not science, it is
not knowledge, it is spirit," were some
of the principles laid down by her pre-
ceptors, principles which naturally ap-
pealed far more to her than they did
to Miss Henrietta Tuck, teacher of the
GAB, and Assistant Principal of the
Thomas Jefferson School, whose scien-
tific training had been acquired by strict
laboratory methods, and whose sharp
brown eyes saw through every boy, to his
certain knowledge, the very first time he
marched downstairs under her strict su-
pervision.
Having duly inspected and classified
Tommy on his entrance to the Thomas
Jefferson School some years before, and
having found no reason for changing her
classification, Miss Henrietta laughed
scornfully at Miss Laurel's exposition
of her favorite's nature work.
" Dear little fellow ! He is such an
inspiration ! Just look at his notes on
spring ! " They were together in Miss
Laurel's room one spring evening after
school.
" Humph ! " said Miss Tuck, glancing
through the meagre notes in Tommy's
painfully vertical hand. " Here he has,
' The lilac buds is 4sided. The snow bird
is a wren. They is fond of evergreens.
The popular buds looks like catapil-
lers. The pussy willows is baby kittens.'
Baby kittens ! What does that mean ?
Humph ! " And Miss Henrietta threw
down the notebook and looked sharply
at Mr. Putnam, the Principal, who was
standing in the doorway.
" That is where you make a mistake,
Ret," remonstrated Miss Laurel gently.
" I was just saying to Mr. Putnam yes-
terday that this is where you fail to catch
the meaning of nature study, — where
your strict scientific training leads you
astray. We are not teaching science,
we are instilling a love for nature. Sup-
pose dear little Tommy does say a lilac
bud is four-sided when, in fact, it is six ;
so long as he really loves the lilac, what
is the difference ? "
" Prove to me that Tommy Owen loves
anything, and I '11 give you a prize," re-
sponded Miss Henrietta sharply.
" You would never say that if you had
him in your classes. I feel fresh inspi-
ration every time I look into those beau-
tiful clear gray eyes of his. Other chil-
dren may be slow to comprehend, but
I always feel that Tommy understands.
And even if he never studies botany,
and never finds out your scientific truths
about the lilac bud, I am sure that his
whole life will be sweetened and
strengthened by the beauty of the lilacs,
that his soul " —
" Soul ! That child has no soul !
Soul ! Humph ! "
And Mr. Putnam, who, though an apos-
tle of nature study, had had a fine sci-
entific training, disregarding the pained
look in Miss Laurel's sweet blue eyes,
turned and went downstairs with Miss
Henrietta.
In spite of his trained mind, it had
never occurred to the Principal that
these vexations over Miss Laurel's un-
scientific enthusiasms came only in the
presence of Miss Henrietta's flouts at
nature study. Neither had his scien-
tific training been of the slightest avail
in interpreting a certain expression in
Miss Henrietta's eyes in his presence, a
The New Hunting.
101
queer softening and brightening that
was, however, perfectly visible and in-
terpretable to every boy and girl in the
building.
But Mr. Putnam was openly delighted
witli the club which Miss Laurel organ-
ized that spring among her pupils, and
of which, at her suggestion, Tommy
Owen was made president. The object
of this club was to pursue nature study
more fully than was possible in the
classroom, to study natural objects in
their places in the fields and woods, and,
above all, to instill a love for wild ani-
mals which would forever prevent the
child's doing them any injury.
All the apostles of nature study being
unanimous in declaring that the pupil
must study from the living animal, —
" Will a stuffed bobolink do ? No ! To
the fields for a live bobolink ! The
light, the dark, the fly, the bird, the
cockroach, they are all ours ! " — even
Miss Henrietta could make no carping
criticism on the club in Mr. Putnam's
presence. Its motto was from Agassiz,
" Study nature, not books," a point on
which, it is needless to say, the members
thoroughly agreed with Agassiz ; and it
rejoiced in the rather ponderous name
of " Hast Thou Named All The Birds
Without A Gun Club."
The success of Miss Laurel's organ-
ization, whose work consisted of strolls
after school about the neighboring
parks, and on Saturdays of trips to the
groves beyond the city limits, was
nothing short of phenomenal. Not only
were teachers in other buildings exhorted
to follow Miss Laurel's example, and to
teach humanity to all living things, to-
gether with nature study, but articles
descriptive of its work appeared in the
leading educational journals, dwelling
particularly on this beautiful phase of
nature study, the instillation of humane
instincts, the teaching of little children
from live, uncaged specimens, picturing
the future of this coming generation,
taught in its infancy, so to speak, to
hate the instruments of slaughter, the
gun and the knife, taught to loathe the
very idea of bloodshed. When these
children reached their majorities, surely,
it was prophesied, time would run back
and fetch the Age of Gold, and the
battle flags would be furled in the Par-
liament of Man, the Federation of the
World.
Whenever a party of teachers from
some other town came to Enterprise to
visit its far-famed schools — and these
visits were frequent — they demanded
first of all to be taken to the Thomas
Jefferson School, there to visit the grade
in which was organized the famous
Hast Thou Named All The Birds
Without A Gun Club, that they might
tell their pupils about it. And once
there, all speedily fell victims to Miss
Laurel's charm of manner, and to the
beauty of Tommy's innocent eyes, as, at
Miss Laurel's request, for the fiftieth
time that term, perhaps, he flitted across
the beach with the little sandpiper, or
chee-chee-cheed with Robert o' Lincoln.
One morning in June, when Miss
Laurel had been detained at home by
some unforeseen occurrence, she found a
company of teachers from a town some
twenty miles from Enterprise already
assembled in the lower hall when she
arrived. Miss Henrietta was there also,
leading across the hall in the direction
of Mr. Putnam's office two boys in an
attitude of resistance. Bud Dolan, Miss
Henrietta's worst pupil, was one ; the
other she recognized, to her horror, —
not instantly, because of his flushed face
and disheveled hair, — as her beloved
Tommy !
" What does this mean, Ret ? " she
whispered anxiously, as the Assistant
Principal thrust the boys in Mr. Put-
nam's office, and there commanded them
to remain until that gentleman came
downstairs.
" Go up to your room and see ! " re-
plied Miss Henrietta sternly.
Miss Laurel, hastening upward, met
102
The New Hunting.
Mr. Putnam in the doorway. Across
the room, from Tommy's seat in the
front row to her desk, stretched a long
procession of legless grasshoppers, living
but helpless, bisected earthworms, and
dehorned pinching bugs.
Miss Laurel's pleading eyes met Mr.
Putnam's stern ones. " Wh — what does
this mean ? " she gasped.
" As nearly as I can gather," he re-
plied, " Bud Dolan and the angelic Tom-
my have fallen out and had a fight.
Unfortunately, Tommy was the victor,
and this is Bud's revenge. Bud, it
seems, is weary of having Tommy ex-
alted and himself abased, and he has
taken this unique method of revealing
the young villain in his true colors. A
fine collection for the president of such
an organization, is it not ? And an op-
portune moment for their exhibition !
Those people downstairs will be up here
presently."
His tones cut like a knife, and Miss
Laurel's eyes filled with tears. Amiable
as she was, a swift suspicion of the in-
stigator of Bud's activity had flashed
through her mind, but this, of course,
she could not voice. With a distinctly
feminine shiver at the approach of an
unusually active pinching bug, she drew
back into the hall, her pleading blue eyes
fixed on Mr. Putnam's impassive face.
" I '11 send up the janitor at once to
take them away," said the Principal,
softening visibly in Miss Henrietta's ab-
sence.
" And Tommy " — she faltered. " You
know my recitation will be nothing with-
out him. Could n't you — could n't you
punish him afterwards ? "
"It has been my plan," explained Miss
Laurel half an hour later to her visitors,
" to write every week a little nature story
which I have some one of the children tell
to the others. Each has his turn, and this
morning, Thomas Owen, president of our
little club, will tell the story of the little
starfishes."
" One time," began Tommy in his
sweet, piping little voice, at the same
time taking a dried starfish from Miss
Laurel's table.
" One minute, Tommy. It is not our
plan," explained Miss Laurel to her
visitors, " to use dead specimens in our
work ; indeed, we are opposed to the use
of specimens at all. Rather will we
roam the fields and see the little animals,
unfrightened and happy, in their homes.
But it is necessary, as well, that the chil-
dren should know something of the trea-
sures of the great deep, and as it is
manifestly impossible to procure a living
starfish, I have, for one time, violated
my rule, and brought this specimen. Go
on, dear."
" One time," repeated Tommy, his
eyes, which had been resting during this
interlude, with deep meaning, on a boy in
the front row, now turned to the visitors
with a look of angelic sweetness in their
clear gray depths, — " one time a little
starfish laid some tiny eggs in the white
sea sand, and then hovered over them,
watching lest some danger should threat-
en them. One day the eggs opened,
and some strange little creatures that
looked much like the eggs themselves
came out. They moved about in the blue
water with their pretty star mother, and
at night they saw, far above, many other
stars like their mother, only far more
bright, in what seemed like another blue
ocean.
" How beautiful these stars were !
Why could not they, too, be stars ? They
became discontented as they thought
about it. But their star mother said,
' Do not have such thoughts ; the way
to grow beautiful is to think beautiful
thoughts.' Then the little ones stopped
thinking of themselves. They thought
of the beautiful things about them, — the
coral branches bearing flower-like pol-
yps ; the sea flower whose hues seemed
to grow more lovely as they watched it ;
and the pearly shells that lay all about
on the shining sand. The golden sun
gilded the waves above them, and at
The New Hunting.
103
night the heavenly stars seemed to smile
upon them, for now they were not dis-
contented as they watched their mother
and these brighter stars.
" And all the time the loving Father
of all had not forgotten for one instant
these little creatures ; and one night the
stars above shone down through the
waves on the mother star and some tiny
stars that moved happily beside her."
" And what does this lesson teach you,
Tommy ? " asked Miss Laurel sweetly.
" The lesson of aspiration ; that by
continually striving we may at last at-
tain."
The visitors, properly impressed, had
no suspicion of why Tommy was at once
excused to Mr. Putnam's office. Neither,
of course, could they know what occurred
there ; but Miss Henrietta did, and re-
joiced thereat.
But worse was to happen that same
day, for, unexpectedly, another delega-
tion of teachers came in, and Tommy,
restored again to the seat of honor in the
front row, was the principal object of
interest to the visitors. The Superin-
tendent of the visiting school, an ardent
ornithologist, and therefore intensely
interested in the Hast Thou Named
All The Birds Without A Gun Club,
not only listened to the recitations, but
himself told the children of a little bird
he had seen that afternoon, a very lit-tle
bir-rd which he had seen from the win-
dows of the inter-urban as he came over,
flitting happily about from fence post to
tree. It was a lit-tle bir-rd, the crown
of its head slate color, bordered by a
white line, its throat was yellow, the
back of its wings and tail were a black-
ish olive, there was a large white patch
on its wings, and the middle of its tail
quills were white. How many lit-tle
boys and gir-rls of this class could tell
him, he wondered, what might be its
name.
Miss Laurel eyed her class anxiously.
" A canary," piped one small voice.
"No — no " —
" An oriole," ventured another.
" No — no — not an oriole, not a
canary. What would a lit-tle caged
canary be doing out in the wide free
fields and woods ? No, no, little ones,"
he continued benevolently. " Now, who
is going to answer my question correctly ?
A lit-tle yellow and black bir-rd, a large
white patch on its wings, the middle of
its tail quills white — Ah, I thought
so ! Here is a lit-tle hand ! Who, of
course, can answer my question, if not
the president of this club of which we
have heard so often ? Rise, lit-tle boy,
and let me hear your reply to this ques-
tion. But first, step out here, my lit-tle
fellow, and let us hear you repeat the
poem which has given its name to the
club."
Tommy, his beautiful gray eyes fixed
on the visitors, his sweet little innocent
voice, pure music, recited the poem on
which Miss Laurel had been drilling him
ever since the organization of the club : —
" Hast thou named all the birds without a
gun?
Loved the woodrose and left it on its stalk ?
At rich men's tables eaten bread and pulse ?
Unarmed, faced danger with a heart of trust ?
And loved so well a high behavior
In man or maid, that thou from speech re-
frained
Nobility more nobly to repay ?
0 be my friend and teach me to be thine ! "
" Good, very good ! Beautifully and
feelingly spoken ! Recited as though he
meant it." The Superintendent nodded
to his teachers, while Miss Laurel smiled
happily. " And now, my lit-tle fellow
— Thomas ? yes ? Thomas, let us hear
the name of the bird which I have de-
scribed to you. Without a doubt, you
can name it correctly."
"It 's a Magnolia Warbler."
" Correct, my lit-tle fellow, correct. I
knew we should get an answer. And
now, wait a bit," as Tommy, who had
returned from the platform, prepared
to take his seat. " One more ques-
tion: tell us where and how you came
to know this lit-tle woodland creature
104
The New Hunting.
— on what one of your pleasant strolls
through — through field and grove you
saw him flitting from bough to bough."
" 'T was n't on no walk," replied
Tommy, rules of grammar forgotten
in his contempt for such guilelessness.
" 'T was yesterdevening in our yard. I
swatted him with my sling-shot, I did,
and Miss Tuck she come along just then
and told me his name."
No amount of optimism and soulful-
ness could lift Miss Laurel from the
depths into which this incident plunged
her, but somehow the days dragged on
until the Thomas Jefferson School picnic,
which took place on the last Saturday
before the close of the term.
She must attend this, of course, and
so must Tommy, who, though deposed
from his high office of president of the
Hast Thou Named All The Birds
Without A Gun Club, showed surpris-
ingly little feeling over his disgrace and
that which he had brought on his room
and his teacher.
It was a beautiful June day, just warm
enough to make the shelter of the forest
trees agreeable. The picnic was held in
a park recently added to the city, a large
part of which was still uncultivated wood-
land. Naturally the children liked this
best, for it was " real woods," and they
found its rough state much more delight-
ful than the smooth shaven parks so like
their own city lawns.
The teachers too, so nearly freed from
the winter's slavery, rejoiced, and sat
about after luncheon was eaten, talking
together and paying as little attention as
possible to their young charges, who scam-
pered here and there, playing wood tag
and hide and go seek.
All were happy, — that is, all but Miss
Laurel, who sat alone on a great log, a
volume of Wordsworth in her plump
white hands. Wordsworth was a nature
poet, and Miss Laurel should have been
reveling in his cloud of golden daffodils
and other poems on nature's pure de-
lights. Instead, however, she was using
the book as a blind, as a pretense of be-
ing occupied.
In what other way could she occupy
herself when Mr. Putnam, who had been
freezingly polite and very distant to her
ever since the, to Henrietta ridiculous, to
her heartbreaking, episode of Tommy
and the bird, was absorbingly engaged
with Miss Henrietta ? They had come
out to Eden Park together, they had
eaten their lunch together, or, rather, he
had eaten with Miss Henrietta the lunch
provided by her, and together they had
been spending the afternoon, gathering
flowei-s, analyzing them, prodding the
shallows of the little brook to stir up pol-
liwogs and minnows for the entertain-
ment of the children, always entirely
neglecting and ignoring her.
Mr. Putnam had felt himself and his
whole school disgraced by the New Hunt-
ing episode, for he had himself made
much of the club, and Miss Henrietta
had endeavored to make him feel the
disgrace as keenly as possible. He re-
proached himself for his weakness in
allowing Miss Laurel's feminine attrac-
tiveness to lure him from the paths of
duty ; had he not been unduly influenced
by her blue eyes, the tragedy would never
have happened. Hardening his heart,
he devoted himself to Miss Henrietta,
who was only too glad to accept his at-
tentions and snub her colleague.
Miss Laurel had worn a pretty gown
to the picnic, a light blue muslin with
much lace trimming and many billowy
little ruffles. It was very becoming, as
was also the big hat with the forget-me-
not garland, and the white parasol,
but was as inappropriate a costume for
such an occasion as Miss Henrietta's shirt
waist and short skirt were sensible. Miss
Henrietta could tramp about in the tall
weeds and wade along the edge of the
brook without fear of soiling her clothes,
and it did not seem to matter at all to
Mr. Putnam that she looked square and
stumpy, and that stray locks of straight
hair hung down about her ears and neck.
Singapore.
105
Of these things Miss Laurel was think-
ing dejectedly, so dejectedly and ab-
sorbedly that at first she scarcely no-
ticed something touch her foot. At a
second touch, however, and the sensa-
tion of a heavy body resting there, she
looked up from the page to gaze straight
into the beady eyes of what seemed to
her an immense snake.
At her scream, everybody turned to
see what was the matter, but no one was
near enough to go to her help. Nobody,
that is, except Tommy, who, concealed
behind a tree near by in his game of hide
and go seek, heard her agonized cry for
help. Tommy, though devoid of soul,
possessed some slight traces of affection,
and an exceptionally well - developed
memory. He remembered that it was
Mr. Putnam and Miss Henrietta who had
trounced him, and what heart he had
was tender toward Miss Laurel, who had
merely shed some senseless tears, and
had relieved him of the presidency of
that miserable club. And so, seizing a
fallen branch that lay at hand, he rushed
to the rescue.
" Don't move, teacher ; I '11 kill him ! "
And thwack, down on the serpent's body
descended Thomas's mighty blows.
In a few minutes the other members
of the party were gathered about them,
and the deposed president of the Hast
Thou Named All The Birds Without A
Gun Club was receiving congratulations
on the promptness and efficiency with
which he had performed the act he had
been trained not to do. All were inter-
ested equally in Tommy and the snake,
which was really a remarkably large
specimen of the Coluber Constrictor.
Miss Henrietta was already on her knees
beside it, scolding Tommy for having
thwacked it with such unnecessary vigor
as to spoil its skin for mounting, explain-
ing the arrangement of the scales, and
exhibiting its forked tongue to the chil-
dren. Mr. Putnam's eyes, however, were
on Miss Laurel's pale face. They must
have said much, for in another minute
vivid blushes had chased away the pallor,
and Miss Laurel, obeying his look, had
risen and stepped toward him.
Miss Henrietta, looking up a few min-
utes later, saw the blue muslin ruffles
trailing off over the grass beside Mr. Put-
nam, who was carrying the closed white
parasol over his shoulder. The little
blue volume of Wordsworth lay forgot-
ten on the log. She followed them with
her eyes until they disappeared among
the shadows of the trees, and then, sneer-
ing savagely, returned to her specimen.
It was the triumph of " spirit " over
science, and on Miss Henrietta's shoul-
ders lay the dust of defeat.
Kate Milner Rabb.
SINGAPORE.
THE equator burns its course through
the Indian Ocean, belts a path across Su-
matra, strikes east again into the sea, —
and just here Asia ends, and finishes with
a period. • This is the island and town of
Singapore.
There is an hotel in Singapore the
town, where you can sit and watch the
ships of all the world go by. And that
means steamers with red funnels, and
freighters with black ones, and yachts
that quiver white in the sunlight, and
men-of-war that stare a sullen gray. It
means white-winged sailing ships, and
junks that creak a flap of burnished
brown, and myriads of tiny paddling
craft that fret the water with their cease-
less motion. It means everything, in
fact, that drives upon the sea as the great
highway.
106
Singapore.
You can even sit at your table and see
all this if you face the right way, for the
sea swims off blue through all the wide
doors and openings. The room that you
sit in is huge and white and cool. It is
of white marble or white plaster, or any-
way, of whatever it is, the color is white,
so the effect is the same. There are big
pillars and a high sort of dome that ends
in a skylight, and to most of the pillars
are fastened whirring electric fans. And
so you sit and are comforted by the cool
whiteness about you and the cool whir-
ring above you.
If you go outside you can take a rick-
shaw or a gharry, — if you are wise, a
gharry. They rattle furiously, and the
seats are hard, but the roof is thick, and
there are shutters that pull up all the
way round. The gharry pony is a wee
troublesome beast. Sometimes he balks
rigid in the roadway, and the gharry
rolls over him and he is lost. Some-
times he kicks and plunges on both sides
of the road at once, and speaks clamor-
ously to the passers-by. Oftener the
gharry-syce runs at his head and stuffs
him with bright green grass, and this en-
courages him to go forward.
At first, you sit and blink at the hard
sunlight and the clouds of fine red dust
that choke your lungs. Gradually you
make out the red road unwinding be-
fore you and the hedges covered with red
dust. Then you see other gharries pass-
ing, and rickshaws, and high English
carts with red-faced men and white-faced
women. You see victorias roll by with
much be-liveried servants and a heavy
rattling of chains, and every time you
look you see a sleek Chinaman lolling on
his cushions, with a wide alpine hat and
a fat cigar.
You see Sikh policemen in khaki knick-
erbockers and red turbans, standing in
the streets or marching past in squads.
Not so readily you spy government peons,
Tamils, and Malays, in white duck with
bands of red across their breasts, and
pancake hats of red and yellow.
There are quantities of creatures pass-
ing you continually whom you seldom
notice. They are more or less the color
of the road, and their sarongs and loin-
cloths have been burned to almost the
color of their wearers. Sometimes there
is a flash of green or orange past your
window, and you look and shudder at
the rings and buttons screwed into ugly
noses. These are Tamil women ; they
are bold and black, and stride along
chewing betel, which leaks red out of
the corners of their mouths. The Ma-
lay women you rarely see, for their sa-
rongs seem always dun-colored or dust-
colored, like the feathers of timid birds.
They hood their heads and slip by un-
noticed, — but if you knew, you would
catch a corner down and round eyes
staring at you.
If Sikh women or Bengali chance to
pass, you stare after them out of the back
of the gharry ; but this is not often.
They look like beautiful tropical birds,
and their plumage is green and saffron
and flame-color. They step daintily like
birds, and their slender legs are bound
tight with coral or pale lemon. Their
ankles ring with heavy silver bracelets,
and it was the clashing of the chains
about their throats that made you look.
You never look at the Chinese in the
roads. They are ugly creatures, — coo-
lie women with blue, wide-flapping trou-
sers, and men with bare backs burned a
dirty yellow. They swing by with heavy
burdens, heads down, muttering a heavy
sort of chant.
These, then, are the roadway people,
whose naked feet leave patterns "in the
thick red dust. There are thousands of
them, and their twitterings sink un-
heeded in the vast low hum of Singa-
pore.
There are other people whom you
cannot fail to see. They reign in the
hotels and shops, and fill gharries and
I'ickshaws, and sometimes dogcarts.
If you meet them on foot they are apt
to jostle you and stare rudely. They
Singapore.
107
dress like Europeans, only more so, and
they love pink and brightest blue.
Some of them are ash-color, some are
yellow, and all of them are sallow and
unhealthy-looking. These are the Eura-
sians. All the people you cannot quite
place are sure to belong to them, — the
foreign-looking people in high traps, and
the frouzy, wretched women who wear
cotton wrappers on their front door-
steps.
But these are the people of Singapore ;
besides, there are things, — buildings and
bridges, and a dirty little river crammed
with boats. There are long red roads
with avenues of bright green trees that
meet overhead. There are private
houses in deep tangled gardens, and
cottages called villas staring on the open
street. There are polo grounds with
lathered horses and dripping sun-burned
men, and golf links and tennis courts
with heated women. There are bar-
racks for the regiment, and deep-browed
bungalows for the officers. There is a
wide-spi-eading garden rustling with rare
plant life, and in one corner a dark
nook of transplanted jungle, — birds and
beasts just trapped, and a restless yawn-
ing tiger striped and shining.
Then there is Government House, in
a big park that might be England. Par-
ticularly in the evening, when the road
winds through a bit of meadow land
with low mists rising, like English mists,
only more unhealthy, — and just beyond
where you startle three deer. But the
view from the top is not English. That
is of the East, with its stretch of shining
sea lying hot and languid. And the green
islands, green the year round, they are
not English. Nor is the blur of spread-
ing brown roofs, nor the slow droning
hum that rises above the heat and the red
dust. Nor again, when a breeze puffs
that way, is the sickish, heavy, clinging
breath a Western breath.
The signal station waves its gaunt arms
just beyond, and on the bare beams
ripples a speech that East and West
may read. A speech of colors that
light and hover on the naked mast like
fluttering butterflies in sunlight, and
spell in symbol the passing word.
There are many turns to the winding
roads of Singapore. They stretch under
avenues of branching trees, and the air
is still and heavy with perfume, and the
horses step on limp, wide-flaring blos-
soms. They spread hot and glaring to
the water front that reeks of brine and
rotting wood. Fragrant and shaded
again, they draw into villas and cottages.
Then out they run between two lines of
marching palms to the island's rim, with
Johore across the way.
There are other places not so nice.
One long road of dust and flat-faced
houses. You bend low when you enter,
and even then your head is brushed by
dangling shabby coats and cast-off finery.
And in the dim corners are cases filled
with the glitter of pawned gold and
the trinkets of half the world grown
desperate. This road winds narrow into
other streets, wretched streets where a
noisy, reeling life washes night and day.
Heavy, helpless, heated ways where the
final misery of the world drifts in. No
green shows here, only the trodden red
road and the stare of blistered house
fronts.
There is yet another part of Singa-
pore. You sit on a wide veranda that
leans an elbow in the street, and smoke
and drink and stare at the people going
past, — and time curls away. There
is a thin gray mist in the air, and the
harbor is of glass. The boats float in
slowly like dreams, and the mist drifts
out to sea.
You do not want to move, — never.
Perhaps you cannot ; you wonder about
it languidly. The big, hot, open play-
ground is just across the way. And
everywhere is a swimming together of
much green, — heavy, motionless lettuce-
green. The road looks hot, and passing
traps raise great clouds of the eternal
red dust. You stare after them lazily
108
Singapore.
and watch them out of sight. You can
do this without moving.
And .also without moving you can see
a great blur of red in the midst of the
trees. You have been speculating about
it idly for the last hour or so. The
ground under it looks like spilled blood,
and every few minutes the air about
it dims with falling red. It looks very
hot and striking in the great smear
of green. Sleepily it pleases you, and
you wonder what manner of tree, or
bush, or beast it is.
Down the same way is the big, yellow,
sun-bleached cathedral. Bits of it are
sticking through the trees. It looks un-
Eastern and out of place, yet altogether
rather nice. It seems to be Sunday, and
slow tired bells are telling people so.
The punkah-pullers are jerking at their
ropes outside. And you actually find
yourself inside, with a high, slender,
Gothic distance before you, and a glint
of long blue windows. The walls and
arches look dim, and a white punkah on
a very long rope is swinging just above
your head.
There are other punkahs, all on long
ropes, and all flapping slowly. There
seems to be no particular connection be-
tween them. They flap and swing most
irregularly, and you watch and try des-
perately hard to fit them to an even time.
You give it up at last, but the attempt
has got you into a delicious, rhythmical
mood that you vaguely feel is sleep.
Then you do not know anything very
clearly. You are conscious of a deep
throbbing that is probably the organ,
and of languid groups of voices that fade
away before you place them.
Finally a single voice speaks, and that
startles you for a moment into listening.
At the same time you become distinctly
aware of the Eurasian school in front
of you. They are all of them in white
with white hats, and they look partic-
ularly clean. They all have a bit of blue
about them. Some have blue sashes with
scant bows. The smaller ones wear
scarfs of blue across their breasts like
peons. Others have only collars and
belt ribbons of blue. You wonder why
they do not choose different colors, — and
then realize how much cheaper a single
one must be. You look more closely at
the big girl just in front, and find that she
is almost white with tawny hair. But
the little one next is as nearly black with
stiff straight hair. After that you find
all shades and features, — and speculate
thoughtfully on Eurasians in general.
Your eyes wander farther and watch
curiously a jet-black Tamil in white
duck. He seems tremendously in ear-
nest and never misses a response. He
is rather dramatic, and stands with arms
impressively folded. There is a large
smattering of gay brunette ladies who
nod a great deal and wear artificial flow-
ers and much fluttering ribbon. They
sing with great zest, but their voices are
not pleasant ; they are flat and shrill, and
their words round off lamely. They are
Eurasians of course. Finally, you pick
out a handful of Europeans in limp, out-
of-date clothes, and a pervading atmos-
phere of mildew and camphor.
Then your interest wanes, and the last
thing you remember is the downward
swish of your punkah, and out of an
opening a final gleam of pure gold be-
hind a cocoanut.
Afterwards you go home in a rick-
shaw. Quantities of other rickshaws
rattle past you, and the night seems full
of double yellow lights. Suddenly an
unknown land stretches close at hand.
Lights have started in the harbor, and
you marvel at their number. You watch
the far-away flickerings of sampans and
the beacons swaying at heavy mast-heads.
There are streets and avenues of these
lights, — and unrecorded constellations.
A bugle call rings into the shore, —
the last notes with a breeze at their heels.
This is later, for the call is " lights out."
You are alone now on your veranda,
and the night is droning on. Rickshaws
roll past softly. Out in that other night
Street Railway Legislation in Illinois.
109
a vagrant ship pokes off again into the
great loneliness.
Far away comes a crash of Chinese
cymbals, and much nearer is the low,
broken whining of an Indian pipe. But
these sounds come far apart, are filled in
with spaces of silence, with waves of
muffled heavy darkness.
Down the street are the dim lamp-
lighted tents of a wandering circus. At
the entrance is a flare of smoke and
torches, and the sudden lighting up of na-
tive faces. There is a deadened banging
and beating going on inside. Snatches of
it drift into the listless night, — mirth-
less, mournful tunes of decades ago.
A heavy, breathless night settles over
the town, and beyond in the black sea
sink the four great stars of the Southern
Cross.
Elizabeth W. H. Wright.
STREET RAILWAY LEGISLATION IN ILLINOIS.
THE story of the street railways of
Chicago illustrates at every point the
want of foresight that has marked the
policy, or lack of policy, of American
cities touching the public services now
required by urban populations. Recent
Illinois legislation, due to the Chicago
street railway situation, is of more than
local or passing interest. The Act of
May 18, 1903, known during its stormy
passage through the two houses of the
General Assembly as " Senate Bill No.
40," is believed to be the first general
legislative act in the United States pro-
viding for the municipal ownership of
street railways. Its final passage after
six years of earnest effort, despite the
utmost opposition of public service cor-
porations and their political allies, is one
of the most notable triumphs of public
opinion within recent years.
The street railways of Chicago were
constructed and have been maintained
under statutes and ordinances enacted
from time to time since 1858. All stat-
utes enacted prior to the State Constitu-
tion of 1870, which prohibited such acts,
were special. By enactments of 1859
and 1861 three street railway corpora-
tions, for the several natural divisions
of the city, were created, each to have
corporate life for twenty-five years. In
1865, by act passed at the instance of
the companies, and by means which have
never been defended, over the veto of
Governor Oglesby, their corporate life
was extended to ninety-nine years.
They claim that this act also operates
to extend their rights in the streets of
Chicago for a like period. The city
has always protested against this legisla-
tive disposition of its streets as a viola-
tion of the principle of home rule. It
also contends that the act violates the
State Constitution of 1848 in certain
particulars.
There are wide differences of view as
to the scope of the Act of 1865. The
city contends that, if valid, it only affects
the streets occupied by the companies at
the date of its passage. This view is
practically that of the Chicago City Rail-
way Company, which occupies the south
division of the city, and is owned by local
capitalists. This company only claims
that about fifteen percentage of its mile-
age, including important portions of its
terminals in the centre of the city, is
covered by the act. The allied companies
which occupy the north and west divi-
sions of the city, and are largely owned
by the Widener-Elkins syndicate of New
York and Philadelphia, after accepting
during many years grants from the city
for extensions and cross lines, strictly
limited to twenty years, have recently
110
Street Railway Legislation in Illinois.
sought to repudiate all limitations in
favor of the city, claiming that the Gen-
eral Assembly of 1865 really intended a
system grant, and that every concession
since made by the city added so much
to their ninety-nine-year possessions.
The city, on July 30, 1883, to set at
rest for the time being its controversy
with the companies over the Ninety-
Nine-Year Act, made a general exten-
sion grant for twenty years without pre-
judice to the conflicting claims of the
parties. Under this and many subse-
quent grants similarly limited for exten-
sion and cross lines, the cable and electric
lines of the companies have been con-
structed and operated. At no time have
the companies operated any of their lines
under the Ninety-Nine- Year Act unsup-
ported by city grants.
The state, by a general act of 1874,
provided for corporations to construct,
maintain, and operate " Horse and Dum-
my Railroads." Under its provisions the
cities of the state might make grants of
rights in their streets for terms not ex-
ceeding twenty years. This act, never
sufficient for the protection of the public
and private interests involved, gradually
became more and more inadequate for
these purposes. With the transforma-
tion of pioneer horse lines into costly
cable and electric systems having hun-
dreds of miles of trackage, great power
plants, thousands of employees, and mil-
lions of dollars in annual receipts, the
need of new legislation became more
and more apparent. However, the
growth of the public service corporation
from small beginnings had been so
rapid, its corrupting influence was so
insidious, and the citizens were so occu-
pied with their private concerns, that as
yet there was no clearly defined public
policy to be expressed in new legislation.
The people of Chicago, while still
groping for a policy, as long ago as 1896
realized that the employment of private
capital in the conduct of the public busi-
ness is the direct cause of municipal mis-
rule and the real issue in municipal
politics ; that the question in every Ameri-
can city is whether the public authority
shall be exercised by the people for pub-
lic ends, or by allied public service cor-
porations for incorporated greed; and
that it will soon be determined whether
the city of the people is to become a pri-
vate municipality.
The City Council, for oft-repeated good
and valuable considerations, had long
been a corporate possession of the street
railways and their allied corporate inter-
ests. With the first attempt of the people
to recover possession of the legislative
authority of the city, these interests took
alarm. Under cover of the exciting na-
tional campaign of 1896 they in advance
acquired title to the incoming Govern-
or and General Assembly of the state.
Early in the legislative session of 1897,
the street railway companies caused to
be introduced into both houses of the
General Assembly a bill to extend for
fifty years their disputed rights in the
streets of Chicago, in wanton disregard
of public interests. This bill promptly
passed the Senate by a large majority.
It was bitterly opposed by the people
and press of Chicago, and was finally
defeated in the House. The companies
thereupon caused to be introduced and
passed a simple measure authorizing the
several cities of the state to make grants
to street railway companies for periods
not exceeding fifty years.
The Act of 1897 operated to extend
the term for which franchise grants
might be made by municipalities from
twenty to fifty years. It was passed by
means that disgraced the state, and
aroused bitter feeling from Chicago to
Cairo. How keenly the people of Illi-
nois resented this debauchery of their
state government was shown a year and a
half later, at the next election of members
of the General Assembly. Of sixteen
retiring senators who voted for the ob-
noxious measure of 1897 but two were
reflected ; and of the eighty-two represen-
Street Railway Legislation in Illinois.
Ill
tatives who so voted but fourteen secured
reelection. There was, perhaps, never
such a slaughter of state legislators. The
memory of the tragedy of 1898 still
haunts the corridors of the state capitol
at Springfield. Indeed, since that mem-
orable election the General Assembly of
Illinois has dealt with much fear and
trembling with the subject of street rail-
way legislation. At its next session, by
unanimous vote in the House, it repealed
the Act of 1897, and restored the former
statute. The Governor who signed the
obnoxious measure of two years before
gave his official sanction to the new act
restoring the situation. Meantime the
street railway companies, which for two
years had vainly sought fifty-year exten-
sions from the City Council of Chicago,
stood idly by, unable to avert the bitter
humiliation of utter defeat.
Thus closes the first chapter of the
story of recent street railway legislation
in Illinois. Pending the struggle above
outlined, an affirmative public policy for
the better control of street railways was
taking form in Chicago. Leaders in the
movement for the protection of public
interests had framed a comprehensive
bill looking to public control and possible
public ownership, which they offered at
the legislative session of 1899. How-
ever, public opinion was not yet ripe for
constructive legislation in the public in-
terest ; and the General Assembly, al-
most entirely composed of new members,
was afraid to experiment with so dan-
gerous a subject.
The movement to make the City Coun-
cil representative of public interests had
so far succeeded, that from the year 1900
its able Committee on Local Transporta-
tion properly assumed the leadership on
behalf of Chicago in the effort to secure
adequate street railway legislation. The
committee, having made an extensive
study of the conditions, submitted to the
General Assembly of 1901 a compre-
hensive bill for a general street railway
law. It was assumed by the framers of
this measure that local transportation
should be treated as a monopoly ; that,
while conducted by the public service
corporation, it should be subjected to
strict public control ; and that the right
of municipal ownership should be re-
served and safeguarded. The bill, drawn
on these lines, although ably supported
by the Council Committee at Springfield,
was strangled in the House Committee
to which it was referred. After re-
peated public hearings this committee
simply failed to report. The bill was
not relished by certain of the street rail-
way interests ; and it is believed that the
inaction of the House was not solely due
to legislative timidity.
Two years now quickly passed, during
which the struggle on behalf of public
interests steadily gained ground in Chi-
cago. The general extension ordinance
of 1883 was to expire on July 30, 1903.
In the spring of 1902, under a recent
act permitting the submission of public
questions to popular vote, the electors of
the city, by a majority of about five to
one, expressed their opinion in favor of
the municipal ownership of the street
railways. However, as many grants of
particular streets made at different times
to the companies will not expire for sev-
eral years, and the city is not in financial
condition for so great a purchase, early
municipal ownership is impracticable
even if desirable. The popular vote of
1902 favoring it must be regarded as an
expression of hostility to the street rail-
way companies rather than as a demand
for immediate municipal ownership.
The failure of the comprehensive
street railway bills of 1899 and 1901,
and the conservative attitude of leading
country members to legislation uniformly
branded " socialistic " by the owners of
the securities of public service corpora-
tions, led the Committee on Local Trans-
portation of the City Council of Chicago
and its supporters to propose a more
simple measure at the session of the
General Assembly of 1903. The end
112
Street Railway Legislation in Illinois.
sought was to reverse existing conditions,
and place the city, instead of the com-
panies, in control of the situation. To
accomplish this, it was deemed necessary
to obtain for the city power to acquire,
own, and operate its street railways.
Hence there arose, prior to the opening
of the session, a wide demand for ena-
bling legislation as a condition precedent
to the further extension of the expiring
franchises of the street railway compa-
nies. Bills to empower the cities of Illi-
nois to acquire street railways, and to re-
serve the right of municipal acquisition
in franchise grants, were promptly offered
by the Council Committee and others.
It was known prior to the organization
of the House that the effort to pass such
a measure would be the chief feature of
the session. The Governor, represent-
ing the spoils faction of his party, of
course desired to have his supporters
control the House. The party boss of
Chicago, Mr. William C. Lorimer, for
purposes of " politics " wished to pos-
sess the House. The editor of the In-
ter-Ocean, Mr. George W. Hinman, —
brought from New York by Mr. Charles
T. Yerkes when he purchased that stal-
wart party organ and made it the avowed
champion of the street railway corpora-
tions, — had, in his capacity of organ
grinder, acquired some party influence
outside Chicago, which gave him a place
in the combine to control the House.
These allies, by the utmost effort, in-
cluding the use of state patronage, con-
trolled the caucus by a bare majority
and secured the organization. They
chose for Speaker a weak and unknown
man, pledging him to obey orders. It
was subsequently understood in the
House that as a condition of his election
the Speaker was required to promise to
carry out Hinman's orders on all street
railway measures, and to use the gavel
when necessary to defeat objectionable
legislation. Mr. " Gus " Nohe, — Lori-
mer's member from his own legislative
district, — when asked whether there
was to be any traction legislation, re-
plied : " I don't know. I do whatever
the old man tells me to ; and he tells me
to do about traction as Hinman says."
Hinman himself announced that there
would be no traction legislation at that
session. The companies, thus safe-
guarded by the organization of the
House, were not openly represented at
Springfield.
The City Council of Chicago sent to
the General Assembly, with its indorse-
ment, a bill for an enabling act prepared
by its Committee on Local Transporta-
tion. A special committee, composed in
part of members of the Council, pre-
sented a somewhat more radical measure.
Several members offered individual bills
largely copied from these two. A bill,
mainly drafted by the Secretary of the
Municipal Voters' League of Chicago,
and offered in the Senate by Senator
Mueller, became known as Senate Bill
No. 40.
While the situation at Springfield was
thus confused, the mayoralty campaign
came on in Chicago. The platform of
the Municipal Voters' League, on which
more than two thirds of the members
of the Council had been elected, was
heartily indorsed by the conventions of
both parties. The Mayor had actively
participated in the development of the
street railway programme embodied in
the League platform. His Republican
opponent, who was without a traction
record, actively exerted his influence to
advance the " Mueller Bill " at Spring-
field. In part because of his efforts, and
in response to the unanimous demand of
the public press of Chicago, Senate Bill
No. 40 passed the Senate just after the
municipal election in Chicago.
The House organization now set itself
to suppress the Senate measure and
to defeat all street railway legislation,
meanwhile pretending to meet the popu-
lar demand. Messrs. Lorimer and Hin-
man went to Springfield and openly as-
sumed personal direction of the House.
Street Railway Legislation in Illinois.
113
The municipal committee, composed al-
most entirely of machine puppets, prompt-
ly suppressed the Senate bill, reporting a
substitute prepared by its chairman, Mr.
Cicero J. Lindley, under the immediate
supervision of Messrs. Lorimer and Hin-
man. These open supporters of the
Yerkes legislation of 1897 now posed as
saviors of the city from the alleged evil
designs of the reform leaders. They
insisted that there should be no grants,
even if made from time to time in suc-
cession, for more than twenty years in
the aggregate. They claimed that their
" Lindley Bill " was the only genuine
municipal ownership measure. The bill
itself was a blundering abstract of parts
of the Senate bill. The provision of
that measure authorizing cities to borrow
money on special certificates with which
to acquire street railway property was
carefully emasculated. Other changes
and omissions pointed unmistakably to a
desire to protect the existing companies.
It may be asked, why did Lorimer,
absolute dictator of the House organiza-
tion, offer a substitute for the Senate bill
in the House ? Why did he not suppress
the obnoxious measure and have done
with the matter ? The answer is that
public opinion was so aroused in favor of
enabling legislation, the suspicion of cor-
porate interference with the public pro-
gramme was so general, that even Lori-
mer did not dare openly to defy it. The
plan was for the House to pass pretended
enabling legislation, and to have it fail
between the two houses.
The popular demand for the Mueller
Bill became so insistent that on the
night before the substitute was set for
second reading, Mr. Lorimer became
alarmed. The Democrats and minority
Republicans that night held separate cau-
cuses to plan for the substitution of the
Senate measure. How many votes could
be mustered against the organization, be-
lieved absolutely to control the fate of all
pending measures in the then closing
hours of the session, was not clear; but
VOL. xcni. — NO. 555. 8
it was evident that the revolt was for-
midable.
Late that night a memorable confer-
ence was held at the call of William C.
Lorimer. The place was his private
chamber at the Leland House, in Spring-
field. The time was from about 11.30
P. M. to 3.30 A. M. The subject discussed
was the pending street railway legisla-
tion. There, in his lair, the boss and his
subordinates received the representatives
of public interests. Mr. Lorimer was
supported by Mr. Hinman, and Messrs.
Lindley, David E. Shanahan, " Gus "
Nohe, and u Ed " Morris of the House.
Mr. Frank O. Lowden was present in
the dual capacity of friend of the organ-
ization and of the city. Messrs. Bennett,
Mavor, and Eidman, of the Council Com-
mittee, and Mr. Graeme Stewart (late
Republican candidate for Mayor of Chi-
cago'), Mr. E. L. Reeves, and the writer,
of the Chicago delegation, were present
on Mr. Lorimer's invitation.
We were promptly asked, " What do
you want ? " Our reply was, " We care
nothing for names ; but, in substance, we
want the Senate bill. Nothing less will
serve." Mr. Lorimer emphatically told
us that the Senate bill was dead and
buried, and that the only hope of legis-
lation at that session lay in the enact-
ment of the Lindley substitute. We were
urged to accept that measure, and invited
then and there to submit amendments.
It was assumed throughout the confer-
ence that we were " up against the real
thing ; " that whatever amendments Mr.
Lorimer might accept that night would
go through the House the next day. The
attitude of the members of that body on
the principal question of the session was
assumed to be wholly immaterial.
It makes one, who regards the people
as the source of political authority and
the General Assembly as a means for the
expression of their will, feel somewhat
queer to participate in a midnight gather-
ing called by a voluntary political boss
to dispense legislation of vital public con-
114
Street Railway Legislation in Illinois.
cern. However, under present conditions,
only thus may one be sure to get next
to the " powers that prey." Thus only
may one reach the source of legislation
affecting privileged interests and study
it in process. In this instance we knew
full well that our presence that night be-
hind the scenes was solely due to omi-
nous signs of revolt in the House. The
boss sought to avert the storm.
The night wore on in discussion — of-
ten heated discussion — of the defects
of the substitute bill. That measure, as
it then stood, was a bungling imitation
of the Senate bill, so emasculated as to
render it practically valueless. It bore
unmistakable marks of tender regard for
the traction interests. It appeared on
its face to provide for municipal owner-
ship, but withheld the means for its ac-
complishment. By the omission of the
provision of the Senate bill, broadly au-
thorizing the municipality to grant streets
already occupied by street railways to
any corporation, without new frontage
consents, it was sought to make it ne-
cessary for the city to deal with the pre-
sent companies and to confirm them in
their possession of the streets.
These chief defects of the substitute
bill were stoutly defended, the first as
an alleged protection to the public from
the possibility of grants for more than
twenty years ; the second out of a pro-
fessed regard for abutting property own-
ers. Amendments to cure several mi-
nor defects, and one covering frontage
consents so worded as not to fall within
the title of the bill, were finally offered
us. The boss thereupon delivered his
ultimatum, in substance as follows :
" You must accept the Lindley Bill with
these amendments, pull down all oppo-
sition on the floor of the House and from
the Chicago press, and actively support
the bill. It is the Lindley Bill or no-
thing."
A few hours later, as the House as-
sembled to consider the Lindley substi-
tute on second reading, the Chicago dele-
gation, about twenty in number, — com-
posed of the Mayor, citizens appointed by
him, and the Council Committee, — re-
jected by practically unanimous vote the
Lorimer ultimatum. This action, taken
with full knowledge that it might mean
present defeat instead of a weak compro-
mise with the machine, was taken the
more readily because Lorimer by giving
out the proposed amendments had already
committed himself to them, and because
the representatives of the city believed
that it was his intention to pass the
amended substitute through the House
and kill it in the closing hours of the
session.
The fight on the floor of the House
was now on. The Speaker, who, the
day before, on the written demand of a
majority of the House, declined to say
whether he would recognize the constitu-
tional demand of five members for a yea
and nay vote on all proposed amend-
ments, arbitrarily postponed the second
reading of the bill to two o'clock that
day, and then until nine o'clock the next
morning. Meanwhile the recalcitrant
members were subjected to one of the
most severe of machine tests. Some
seventy-five bills making appropriations
for the state government and the public
institutions throughout the state, and
many other bills of local or special inter-
est to the members, stood on the calendar
on third reading. Those favoring the
Senate traction bill, led by Mr. Oliver
W. Stewart, the able prohibition mem-
ber, had given notice that none of these
measures should pass until the traction
question was acted on by the House.
The organization leaders now pre-
sented two carefully chosen appropriation
bills for passage. The first was the ap-
propriation bill for the maintenance of
the State Normal School at Macomb, the
home of Mr. Sherman, leader of the Re-
publican opposition. It was permitted to
fail, the friends of Senate Bill No. 40,
including Sherman, refusing to vote. A
second appropriation bill shared the fate
Street Railway Legislation in Illinois.
115
of the first. Thereupon the House trans-
acted some unimportant business and
adjourned for the day. That night re-
presentatives of the city declined an in-
vitation by Mr. Lorimer to another con-
ference.
All now anxiously awaited the morrow.
Would the Speaker obey his oath of
office, permitting a roll call ? Was the
will of William Lorimer to be more po-
tent than the Constitution of Illinois ?
Was the Speaker's gavel to be used to
make a minority equivalent to a major-
ity ? The action of the Speaker would
plainly demonstrate to an entire people
whether the public service corporation
regards its wants superior to all law,
whether corporate influence has become
the supreme law of a great state. The
opponents of the Lindley Bill believed
that the Speaker would finally observe
his oath. Even they had not fathomed
corporate and political insolence.
The next morning, when the House
met with packed galleries, " the organi-
zation " made a final effort to break the
ranks of the majority. The " Child Labor
Bill," the most popular measure on the
calendar, was called on final passage.
The vote disclosed the exact strength
of the opposing forces. Fifty members
voted aye. Ninety-six sat mute. The
majority against the Lindley Bill was
almost two to one. Had William Lori-
mer been present, he might have changed
the pi'ogramme ; but, having given his
Speaker orders for the day, he awaited
results at his hotel. No one having au-
thority was there.
The crisis now came. The Lindley
Bill was called on second reading. The
Speaker, deathly pale, stood at his desk,
gavel in hand. Behind him were several
ladies. Massed about his desk were
twenty or more strong men prepared to
defend him. Mr. Lindley offered his
first amendment. The opposition leader
moved to lay it on the table. Ninety-
six members rose in their seats and
shouted, "Roll call! Roll call!" The
Speaker, refusing to hear them, declared
the amendment adopted by viva voce
vote. "You lie! " shouted Representa-
tive Allen of the minority. Then amid
the utmost confusion and excitement, with
the majority members standing on their
desks shouting, " Roll call! Roll call! "
Mr. Lindley hastily offered his six other
amendments. The Speaker, without the
formality of reading or a vote, declared
them all adopted. Without motion, he
also declared the bill passed to its third
reading, beyond the reach of further
amendments.
It is impossible to describe the scene
or to convey an adequate idea of its in-
tensely dramatic interest. The pale and
trembling Speaker, protected from fly-
ing inkstands by the women placed for
that purpose at his back, hastily executed
his orders. But he was not thus to es-
cape the utmost personal humiliation.
While in the act of declaring the bill
passed to a third reading, Representative
Burke of Chicago, unsupported, made a
rush for him, only to be roughly thrown
to the floor. This was the extent of the
so-called " riot " in the House. There
was a rush of members to the support of
Burke ; but the cowardice of the Speaker
averted a general fight. The rush of one
outraged member was quite enough for
him. Without waiting for more, he pre-
cipitately fled to his room, declaring that
the House had taken a recess until after-
noon.
All this took place in much less time
than it has taken to describe it. The
turmoil and excitement at this point are
indescribable. The Speaker's hasty flight
led to a quick transformation. Repre-
sentative Murray of Springfield, stand-
ing on his seat near the Speaker's desk,
solemnly called the House to order and
said : " It appears that the House is with-
out a presiding officer ; I move that Mr.
Allen of Vermilion be chosen Speaker
pro tern." The motion carried, Mr.
Allen took the deserted chair, and the
confusion quickly subsided. Within per-
116
Street Railway Legislation in Illinois.
haps a minute after the Speaker fled,
the reorganization was perfected, and a
roll call of the House was in progress.
The manner in which the ninety-six
members, whose high duty it was to re-
store constitutional government in Illi-
nois, performed their unexpected task left
nothing to be desired. Their action on
that memorable day and in the remain-
ing days of the session will forever re-
main conspicuous among the landmarks
on the difficult road to really represen-
tative government. There are men in
our public life who are not the creatures
of the corporations, men who care for
something higher than spoils.
The House now proceeded to recall
the Liudley Bill from its third read-
ing. When each amendment had been
reconsidered and laid on the table, the
Senate bill was substituted, and the
Lindley Bill became in fact, if not in
name, Senate Bill No. 40. Meanwhile
the leaders of the majority, in conference
in an adjoining committee room, pre-
pared the following preamble and reso-
lution : —
" Whereas, The Speaker of this House
has by revolutionary and unconstitutional
methods denied a hearing in this House
on a roll call constitutionally demanded
upon measures of grave import, prepared
by those not members of this House, and
has attempted by the same methods to
force the same beyond the point where
they can be amended or calmly con-
sidered upon their merits,
" 'Therefore, be it resolved, That, un-
til the House records shall show a re-
consideration of the action of this House
on House Bill No. 864 [Lindley Bill]
and all amendments thereto, and shall
show the adoption of this resolution, and
the House shall be assured of the con-
tinuous observance during the remainder
of this session of the constitutional right
of a roll call on all questions and the
due consideration of the business of this
House, no further votes be cast upon any
pending bill by the members of this
House without a permanent reorganiza-
tion of this House."
The foregoing preamble and resolution
were thereupon signed by the ninety-six
opposition members and spread on the
Journal of the House. The Speaker
pro tern, was also instructed to read it to
the Speaker in the presence of the House
on his return to the chair. This was
done by Mr. Allen with great solemnity
that afternoon. Whereupon the House
took a recess, during which the Speaker
conferred with Mr. Lorimer, Mr. Hin-
man, the Governor, Mr. Lindley, and a
few others. Upon his reappearance he
presented the following written state-
ment to the House : —
" I have been approached at different
times by parties who intimated to me
that I could make money by allowing a
roll call on what is known as the Mueller
Bill or permitting its passage. I do not
know whether the parties making the
statements were authorized to make them
or not, but the statements having been
made to me, and some of them recently,
fully convinced me that there was some-
tiling wrong with this effort on the part
of outside parties to push this bill. For
this reason, I denied the roll call, and
have stood firm on this proposition up to
the very limit. A majority of the House
having signified their desire to have a
roll call on this proposition, I wash my
hands of the entire matter, and will per-
mit a roll call to be had."
Thereupon Mr. Rinaker, the able
leader of the majority, promptly moved
the appointment by the Speaker himself
of a committee of five members to in-
vestigate his charges. Upon Mr. Rina-
ker's suggestion it was determined that
no action should be taken on traction or
any other important legislation pending
the investigation of the charges made by
the Speaker reflecting on the House, and
that the time of adjournment, already
agreed upon, should be postponed as long
as might be necessary for a thorough
investigation of the charges, and for the
Street Railway Legislation in Illinois.
117
consideration thereafter of the pending
street railway measures.
The next morning the press contained
a statement from Governor Yates, in
which he said : —
" As to Speaker Miller's action in
opposing a roll call on the Mueller Bill,
... I am glad to have the opportunity
to say that I believe him to be a brave
and honest man, pursuing the only course
such a man can pursue under the circum-
stances. ... I repeat, that I believe
that in opposing what he believed to be
corruption, his action is honest and brave,
and entitles him to the thanks of every
good citizen of Illinois."
The following morning Representative
Schlagenhauf of the majority called the
attention of the House to a recent edi-
torial published by Mr. Hinman in the
Chicago Inter-Ocean, which was in part
as follows : " And the boodle is ready.
And it is in use. And some members
already have been bought. And others
are negotiating for it. ... Can money
buy the Forty-Third General Assembly
of the State of Illinois ? " Thereupon
the House voted to call Mr. Hinman
before its bar to give such information
as he might have in support of his
charges. Afterwards the House referred
this matter to the investigating commit-
tee. The Speaker in appointing the
committee passed over Mr. Ririaker,
placing on it members a majority of
whom it was feared could be depended
upon to make a whitewashing report.
Thereupon Representative Darrow of
Chicago, after a hasty consultation,
moved to amend by adding six names of
leading members, including Mr. Rinaker.
This motion was carried on roll call.
This committee on April 30 made
its report, finding in part as follows : —
"1. That the evidence produced be-
fore us does not establish any real at-
tempt to corruptly influence the action of
the Speaker of this House.
" 2. That there was no reasonable or
substantial ground for the editorial en-
titled ' Boodle,' published in the Chicago
Inter-Ocean on April 21, 1903, and re-
cited in the resolution introduced by Re-
presentative Schlagenhauf ; and that the
charges therein contained, and as speci-
fied further in the testimony of Mr. Hin-
man, were wholly without truth or foun-
dation as to any member or officer of
this House, so far as we have been able
to discover. Your committee feels it due
to it to say, in view of the publication by
Mr. Hinman of his statement read before
it, that it regarded the ' rumors ' so fre-
quently referred to by him, and the jocu-
lar remarks attributed to members and
others, as utterly unworthy of notice, and
the charges reflecting upon citizens of
Chicago, employed or selected to repre-
sent it, who, in the opinion of your com-
mittee, deservedly stand high in the es-
timation of its best citizens, as wholly
outside the purposes of this investigation.
It also, in the light of the evidence before
it, upon the specific charges made by him,
placed no credence upon any of his
charges of improper conduct or motives
upon their part in connection with the
subject of this investigation."
The report of the committee was adopt-
ed by a unanimous vote of the House on
roll call. Messrs. Lorimer and Hinman,
at the close of Mr. Hinman's testimony
before the committee, had left Spring-
field, not to return during the session.
Upon the adoption of the report of the
committee, the House by unanimous vote
directed its Municipal Committee to re-
port Senate Bill No. 40. Mr. Lindley
at once complied, and the bill was prompt-
ly passed, with certain amendments pro-
posed and accepted by the representa-
tives of the city, by both houses. It went
to the Governor the day before final
adjournment. He promptly called on
the Attorney-General for an opinion as to
its constitutionality, meanwhile request-
ing both houses of the General Assembly
not to adjourn until he had had time
fully to consider its terms. The At-
torney-General on the last night of the
118
Street Railway Legislation in Illinois.
session gave his opinion to the effect that
the constitutional objections to the mea-
sure were not well founded. The friends
of the bill in both houses, believing that
to comply with the Governor's request
would lead to a veto, and that if the
whole responsibility was thrown on him
he would approve it, adjourned sine
die.
The Governor took the full ten days
allowed by the Constitution to determine
whether to veto or sign the bill. After
two public hearings, and after receiving
much advice, both public and private, he
finally on the last day approved it with
extreme reluctance. How difficult it was
for him to do so appears from the memo-
randum explaining his action, which he
filed with the Secretary of State. In
that remarkable document, he said : —
'' I would veto this bill, wei-e it not
that I have great confidence in the City
Council of 1903, and great confidence in
the people. . . .
" It has been urged against this bill by
the one man in Illinois who was so cour-
ageous as to argue for its veto after it
was passed . . . that this bill was passed
under the whip and spur of a few news-
papers in the city of Chicago. This is
true. Worse than that, it was passed by
default in the Senate and by riot in the
House. Intimidation of every possible
kind has been resorted to, and within the
ten days during which the Governor has
the right, under the wise and wholesome
and hitherto unquestioned veto power of
the Constitution, to consider and examine
a bill, these same newspapers have en-
deavored to complete their usurpation of
governmental functions — their ' govern-
ment by newspapers ' — by ridiculing
and abusing the executive.
"I approve the bill in spite of this
clamor, because the real question is, shall
the city councils of cities, and the people
thereof, be permitted to do a right thing,
and not, has the right thing been brought
about in the wrong way ?
" I believe that this bill should be ve-
toed, were the General Assembly in ses-
sion, and that then either this bill should
be amended, or a new bill passed with-
out the faults of this bill."
Thus after six years of strenuous con-
flict between public and private interests,
Senate Bill No. 40 became a law of the
State of Illinois. This struggle, if it be
as significant as it seems to the writer,
means that the employment of private
capital in the conduct of the public busi-
ness has led us to the brink of gov-
ernment by corporations. If the public
service corporation is permanently to
participate in the public administration,
it must submit to public control. Some
basis other than that of vested right must
be sought for the security of private
capital employed in the public business.
That, however, is another story.
It is sufficient here to add that pre-
sent conditions are intolerable. By means
of the Act of 1903 the people of Chicago
have sought to create conditions that will
make the interests of the city and of the
companies much more nearly identical,
and lead to greatly improved relations,
with adequate public control. Conserva-
tive men hope that this attempt will suc-
ceed. If other solution of the problem
be not found, and that speedily, public
ownership is inevitable and desirable.
Edwin Burritt Smith.
Books New and Old.
119
BOOKS NEW AND OLD.
STOPS OF VARIOUS QUILLS.
THE present commentator wishes to
offer for consideration several books of
verse which seem to him to merit more
than ordinary attention. It is always in-
teresting to examine a first book of verse
by a writer who has won a reputation in
prose. Who knows but it may bring us
into a new and more intimate relation
with an old acquaintance ? Who knows
— and human nature faces this possibili-
ty with almost equal complaisance — but
the verse may bring into clear outline cer-
tain suspected limitations, arid so settle
the question once for all. In taking up
the first collection of Josephine Daskam's
poems,1 one is struck anew with the re-
markable flexibility of her talent. She
touches with no little adroitness the stops
of various quills ; she satisfies the ear
with metres and the taste with images.
Once or twice she stirs the imagination.
In short, she writes excellent verse, most
of which seems the product of an inspi-
ration from without. She has written,
one surmises, from some motive other
than the desire for self-expression ; per-
haps from a private wish to prove her-
self possessed of something more than
the worldly cleverness upon which her
popularity is founded. As a result, her
verse, skillful and interesting as it is,
lacks personal distinction ; it is not her
u right-hand mode of expression ; " it is
not, perhaps, in the very strictest sense,
poetry.
This is high ground, but one is excused
for taking it by the quality of several
other new books of verse which seem to
possess both spontaneity and distinction.
1 Poems. By JOSEPHINE DASKAM. New
York : Charles Scribner's Sons. 1903.
2 The Singing Leaves. A Book- of Songs and
Young persons still dream dreams of
startling the world by some outburst of
metrical frenzy which shall write their
names upon the skies. Few persons of
any age are ready to devote themselves,
for better or worse, to " the homely
slighted shepherd's trade." Few of us
are worthy to be so slighted ; we do not
deserve the tribute of contempt which the
vulgar world is ready to pay to those who
brazenly pursue the best. No American
writer of verse is now moved by a more
sincere poetic impulse than Miss Pea-
body. Among her lesser qualities is a
cleverness which might easily have been
employed to win popular success in some
of the forms of literature now most sure
of a wide, and casual, audience. It has
not been cultivated to that end, and the
writer's reward is to have produced, in a
period during which good versifying has
become the rule, not a little true poetry.
As " a book of songs and spells " The
Singing Leaves 2 differs in some evident
respects from Miss Peabody's former
books of verse ; but its essential qualities
are the same. This is to say that they
are the reverse of commonplace. Her
poetry has a delicate savor of its own,
a mystical sweetness, a purity of ways
untrodden and apart, yet not remote from
the common field of this our strife. I
am almost sorry to have used the word
" mystical," lest some brethren of robust
sense, who connect the word with a vague
condition of inspired foolishness, should
mistake my meaning. It means nothing
of the sort to me. However simple the
diction, one cannot always be sure, on
first reading, of the distinct " meaning "
of some of Miss Peabody's songs. Very
Spells. By JOSEPHINE PRESTON PEABODY.
Boston and New York : Houghton, Mifflin &
Co. 1903.
120
Books New and Old.
likely there might be difficulty in para-
phrasing them ; perhaps one might find
it hard to reduce them to logical form.
Miss Daskam's verses are characterized
by the same alert common sense which
is the mark of her prose work. Miss
Peabody's poems are the product of a
sense uncommon and subtle, a divining
sense ; and whatever appearance of ob-
scurity there may be in its expression is
due to the diviner's method of suggesting
truth by adumbration rather than by de-
finition. This seems a clumsy way of
explaining what is, after all, a sufficiently
simple thing. One does not need to have
the difference between this Road-Song
and a mathematical proposition set forth
with diagrams : —
" At home the waters in the grass
Went singing happy words ;
But here, they flicker through my hands
As silent as the birds.
" I see a Rose. But once they grew
All thronging, thronging, — wild,
And white, and red, before I came
To be a human child."
Perhaps it is in her " spells " that the
poet's sense of intangible relations is most
clearly expressed. We may quote only
one, a Charm : to be Said in the Sun : —
" I reach my arms up to the sky,
And golden vine on vine
Of sunlight, showered wild and high,
Around my brows I twine.
" I wreathe, I wind it everywhere,
The burning radiancy
Of brightness that no eye may dare,
To be the strength of me.
" Come, redness of the crystalline,
Come green, come hither blue
And violet — all alive within,
For I have need of you.
" Come honey-hue and flush of gold,
And through the pallor run,
With pulse on pulse of manifold
New largess of the Sun !
" O steep the silence till it sing !
O glories from the height,
Come down, where I am garlanding
With light, a child of light ! "
The latest book of verses by Mr.
Yeats * does not show an increase of con-
trol over his instrument. One has ad-
mired the childlike quality of his genius
while deploring its occasional lapses into
childishness. A poet must for proof of
greatness show independence even of his
own fancies. Mr. Yeats is often spirit-
ualistic rather than spiritual, vaguely su-
perstitious rather than mystical. How
much of his work is the product of crea-
tive imagination, how much of indulged
whimsy, remains to be determined. In
form the present volume is deliberately
queer. The printer has been encouraged
to use red ink in certain passages which
do not seem especially to cry for rubrica-
tion. A preface is let fall unexpectedly
in the middle of the book. Here and
there the sign for " and " is substituted
for the word. Is there something sym-
bolic in the usage ? Several of the poems
seem to mean nothing, and one or two
are not recognizably metrical, as, for in-
stance, the lines called The Arrow : —
" I thought of your beauty and this arrow
Made out of a wild thought is in my marrow.
There 's no man may look upon her, no man,
As when newly grown to be a woman,
Blossom pale, she pulled down the pale blossom
At the moth hour and hid it in her bosom.
This beauty 's kinder, yet for a reason
I could weep that the old is out of season."
This is rather too much for the old-
fashioned ear, which is used to expect
that a poem shall be written in some
kind of verse and shall make some kind
of sense. It is an extreme instance of
Mr. Yeats's irresponsible manner. There
are many passages of pure poetry in the
book : —
" We sat grown quiet at the name of love.
We saw the last embers of daylight die,
And in the trembling blue-green of the sky
A moon, worn as if it had been a shell
Washed by time's waters as they rose and fell
About the stars and broke in days and years."
With such lines for evidence, one must
continue to hope that time will prove
1 In the Seven Woods. By W. B. YEATS.
New York : The Macmillan Co. 1903.
Books New and Old.
121
this brilliant writer priest of a true poetic
faith, and not merely victim of a minor
obsession.
Mr. Yeats is childlike in his lack of
humor ; to the profane, indeed, humor-
lessness seems a main quality of these
symbolistic people. We are really not
ready to be persuaded that the sublime
and the ridiculous are precisely the same
thing. When Mr. Yeats writes grave-
ly:-
" Michael will unhook his trumpet
From a bough overhead,
And blow a little noise
When the supper has been spread.
Gabriel will come from the water
With a fish tail, and talk
Of wonders that have happened
On wet roads where men walk,"
one must be allowed to think it funny ;
though one may keep his face straight
as he does before a child whose speech
is equally ingenuous and cryptic.
II.
There is no mysticism in Gawayne
and the Green Knight,1 and there is a
great deal of humor. It is, in fact, an
agreeable reversion to a type of poetry
now little cultivated. The present review-
er confesses that lie sighed over the title,
expecting to find some aerated treatment
of the familiar Arthurian material. A
glance at the first page relieved his mind
at once. " Bless me ! " he murmured,
rubbing his eyes, " couplets ! " —
" My tale is ancient, but the sense is new, —
Replete with monstrous fictions, yet half
true ; —
And, if you '11 follow till the story 's done,
I promise much instruction, and some fun."
The promise is kept. The story shall
not be told here. One might say that the
style combines something of the mellow-
ness of Holmes with the airy familiarity
of Byron ; but it is not especially grace-
ful, after all, to express admiration of
one person in terms of two or three
1 Gawayne and the Green Knight. By CHARL-
TON MINER LEWIS. Boston and New York :
Houghton, Mifflin & Co. 1903.
others. Mr. Lewis is not an imitator ;
his little work bears all the marks of
spontaneity. It belongs to a school of
English poetry older and clearly more
indigenous than that of Mr. Yeats ; a
school of which the first and greatest
master is Chaucer. For a brief sample
of its quality we may quote the descrip-
tion of the heroine : —
" Her face was a dim dream of shadowy light,
Like misty moonbeams on the fields of night,
And in her voice sweet Nature's sweetest tunes
Sang the glad song of twenty cloudless Junes.
Her raiment, — nay ; go, reader, if you please,
To some sage Treatise on Antiquities,
Whence writers of historical romances
Cull old embroideries for their new-spun fan-
cies ;
I care not for the trivial, nor the fleeting.
Beneath her dress a woman's heart was beat-
ing
The rhythm of love's eternal eloquence,
And I confess to you, in confidence,
Though flowers have grown a thousand years
above her,
Unseen, unknown, with all my soul I love her."
Mr. Zangwill's verses 2 are modern,
and, as a whole, impressive. They possess
the poignant racial note which has given
the key to his best prose work. Few
among the inspired sons of Israel have
concerned themselves so frankly and
forcibly with the issues of Zion. There
are, to be sure, many bits of verse in
the present volume which, unless as they
remind us of Heine, seem the work of
a poet, and not especially of a Hebrew
poet : —
" Of woman and wine, of woods and spring,
And all fair things that be,
The poets have sung, of everything :
What is there left for me ?
Why, songs of thee."
But the poems which strike deepest are
those which express the poet's sombre
fidelity to the truth of that racial fate
in which his own fate is involved. Mr.
Zangwill has never shrunk from re-
cording the sordidness as well as the
grandeur of the Hebrew character.
2 Blind Children. By ISRAEL ZANQWILL.
New York : Funk & Wagnalls Co. 1903.
122
Books New and Old.
The conclusion of the whole matter seems
to be expressed in the verses which he
calls simply Israel : —
" Hear, O Israel, Jehovah, the Lord our God is
One,
But we, Jehovah, his people, are dual and so
undone.
" Reeling before every rowdy, sore with a
hundred stings,
Clothed in fine linen and purple, loved at the
courts of Kings.
"Faithful friends to our foemen, slaves to a
scornful clique,
The only Christians in Europe, turning the
other cheek.
" Priests of the household altar, blessing the
bread and wine,
Lords of the hells of Gomorrah, licensed keep-
ers of swine.
" Blarneying, shivering, crawling, taking all
colors and none,
Lying a fox in the covert, leaping an ape in
the sun.
" Tantalus — Porteus of peoples, security comes
from within ;
Where is the lion of Judah ? Wearing an
ass's skin! "
This is vigorous speech, bitter speech ;
for there is nobody more loyal to the
ideals of his race than the speaker.
Not a few of the poems possess an
almost classical grace and finish. Here
is one of the best of them : —
" Silly girl ! Yet morning lies
In the candor of your eyes,
And you turn your creamy neck,
Which the stray curl-shadows fleck,
Far more wisely than you guess,
Spite your not-unconscious dress.
In the curving of your lips
Sages' cunning finds eclipse,
For the gleam of laughing teeth
Is the force that works beneath,
And the warmth of your white hand
Needs a God to understand.
Yea, the stars are not so high
As your body's mystery,
And the sea is not so deep
As the soul in you asleep."
1 The Eastward Eoad. By JEANNETTE
BLISS GILLESPY. New York : James Pott &
Co. 1903.
Miss Gillespy's bent is reflective rather
than impassioned, and finds an especially
happy expression in the measured phrase
and balanced structure of the classical
forms of English verse.1 Possibly her
tendency toward didacticism is a little
too strongly marked, but that is a fault
easily to be detected in other people ;
and it is something like ingratitude to
animadvert upon an impulse which can
produce such a quatrain as this : —
" ' 0 clear-eyed daughter of the gods, thy
name ? ' —
Gravely she answered, ' I am called Success.'
' The house, the lineage, whence thy beauty
came ? ' —
' Failure my sire ; my mother, Weariness.' "
But classical versification is also, in
the right hands, an instrument for the
expression of impassioned feeling which
none of the modern exuberant forms
have excelled. So pure a technique as
Mr. Watson's, applied to the expression
of so pure a passion, could hardly fail
to make his verses, " written during
estrangement," 2 unusually impressive.
The very restraint which his chosen
medium imposes upon him is to the
ultimate advantage of his poetry. If
Mr. Kipling was the laureate of impe-
rialism during the Boer war, Mr. Wat-
son was the laureate of England ; and
this, in after years, when The Absent-
Minded Beggar and other popular dog-
gerel of the sort is forgotten, England
will not be slow to feel. What is there
in such verse as this, unless the prick of
truth, to have aroused a popular clamor
of resentment ? —
" When lofty Spain came towering up the seas
This little stubborn land to daunt and quell,
The winds of heaven were our auxiliaries,
And smote her, that she fell.
" Ah, not to-day is Nature on our side !
The mountains and the rivers are our foe,
And Nature with the heart of man allied
Is hard to overthrow."
2 For England: Written During Estrange-
ment. By WILLIAM WATSON. New York and
London : John Lane. 1903.
Books New and Old.
123
The popular clamor did, as we know,
arise. If the poet had written blatant
nonsense about the Briton's Duty to
Strike for his Altar and his Birthright,
his verse would have been accepted as
quite suitable for the occasion. His
position needs no further defense than is
given by his own noble lines, On Being
Styled " Pro-Boer : " —
" Friend, call me what you will : no jot care I :
I that shall stand for England till I die.
England! The England that rejoiced to see
Hellas unbound, Italy one and free ;
The England that had tears for Poland's doom,
And in her heart for all the world made room ;
The England from whose side I have not
swerved ;
The Immortal England whom I, too, have
served,
Accounting her all living lands above,
In Justice, and in Mercy, and in Love."
Surely this is worthy to be set among
the " noble numbers " of old England.
in.
Signs increase of a tendency on the
part of our verse writers to approach
the dramatic form. Miss Daskam's vol-
ume ends with a dramatic sketch in
blank verse which is, perhaps, the best
thing in the book. Mr. Yeats's collec-
tion includes a fresh play for his new Irish
stage, — apparently (how can a plain
person be sure ?) only another leaf out
of Maeterlinck. There are, moreover,
since last accounts, several new volumes
of metrical plays upon the market, only
two of which can be mentioned here.
The first * is especially interesting be-
cause in presenting " five modern plays
in English verse," the author is actually
trying to interpret the present moment
in blank verse ; and she comes very near
success, nearer, perhaps, than any one
else has come. The three briefer num-
bers can hardly be called plays, but
they are extremely good poetic dialogues,
and one of them, at least (At the Goal)
1 The Passing Show. By HARRIET MON-
ROE. Boston and New York : Houghton, Mif-
flin & Co. 1903.
is, with all its brevity, not only dra-
matic, but tragic. One is not sure that the
two longer pieces should have been cast
in verse at all. Perhaps it is simply
their novelty which one resists ; I am
inclined to think there is a real incon-
gruity between their substance and their
form. It is hardly possible to doubt
that the author has found her key-note
in Sudermann, and Sudermann is essen-
• tially a prose interpreter of life. There
is plenty of human intensity in his plays,
but no precipitation of immortal pas-
sion. Like Ibsen, he studies conditions
and types ; the record of his observa-
tions is a marvel, but it is not poetry.
In Miss Monroe's two plays we find
similar materials. Each of them pre-
sents a pregnant psychological episode
in the lives of a group of persons ; and
there is nothing in either situation which
prose could not have taken care of.
Such, after several careful readings and
some serious thought, is my unwilling
conclusion with regard to the absolute
merit of these interesting studies.
Mr. Torrence's play 2 is both less
novel and less questionable in quality.
It is tragic both in substance and in form.
Its theme has the inestimable advantage
of possessing already a hold upon the
imagination of the general ; an advan-
tage which great dramatic poets from
.ZEschylus to Shakespeare have sedulous-
ly pursued, and which the best of their
successors down to Mr. Stephen Phillips
have continued to pursue. Mr. Tor-
rence has, like Mr. Phillips, successful-
ly avoided the Shakespearean manner.
How difficult a feat this is can hardly
be understood by those who disbelieve
in the existence of a poetic diction. Ob-
serving the usage rather than the theory
of Wordsworth, we perceive that every
age has its noble and familiar forms of
speech ; and the poet's only folly is to
fail of recognizing the loftier instrument
2 El Dorado. By RIDGELY TORRENCE. New
York and London : John Lane. 1903,
124
Books New and Old.
which, in his own day, is ready to his
hand. This is the variety of folly which
produces pseudo-Elizabethan plays and
plays in modern colloquial verse.
Mr. Torrence's play is dignified and
original. He does not altogether discard
old forms, but he does not slavishly fol-
low them. The Prologue and Epilogue
are so admirable that one wishes to
quote them entire. This much, at least,
we may give from the Prologue : —
'' Shadow. Into this world where Life is born
of Light
I, Shadow, have been sent to bring you peace,
To make you wise ; within my tragic themes,
Lost Love, A Sullen Will, Dead Hope and
Dread,
You shall find balm, pleasant with secret nard
To heal your discontent, for all men know
That he for whom noon's brightest radiance
glows
Is he who waked and shuddered at midnight
The gold, five-keyed Elizabethan horn
Shall be for us the soothing instrument.
Then for the tale's sake I do kneel for help,
To sky-browed ^Eschylus, who, down the years,
Mourns deeply through a sterner, briefer shell,
Making men hear the eagle wheel and shriek
Round the sea rock on which all hope lay
bound."
There is no mistaking the firm, sus-
tained touch of these verses ; and their
promise is not belied in the drama which
follows. If the characterization were
of as rare quality as the theme and the
verse, the play would be great indeed.
Just at that point in the poet's effort
there seems a little suggestion of strain.
Beatrix d' Estrada is admirable, but
Perth and Coronado, the leading male
characters, are not altogether free from
that overt appeal to the sympathies which
is a known property of melodrama. The
dialogue is,- for the most part, rapid and
compact, and the action, while it does not
attempt to preserve the unities, is dramat-
ically true and complete. We ought to
be grateful for so pure a product in dra-
matic poetry from the hand of an Amer-
ican.
1 Platonism in English Poetry of the Sixteenth
and Seventeenth Centuries. By JOHN SMITH
In the end, one finds that the study
of these contrasting experiments in po-
etic drama has served simply to reaffirm
an ancient article of faith. No great
dramatic poetry, no great epical poetry,
has ever dealt with contemporary con-
ditions. Only the austere processes of
time can precipitate the multitude of
immediate facts into the priceless re-
siduum of universal truth. The great
dramatists have turned to the past for
their materials, not of choice, but of
necessity. Here and there in the dark
backward and abysm of time, some hu-
man figure, some human episode, is seen
to have weathered the years, and to
have taken on certain mysterious attri-
butes of truth ; and upon this founda-
tion the massive structure of heroic
poetry is builded.
H. W. Boynton.
ONE envies Mr. Harrison the many
Platonic months of earnest study which
Poetry. must have gone to the making
of his account of Platonism in English
Poetry.1 To walk familiarly, when one
is young, with the ideal forms of Beauty,
Truth, and Goodness which loom over
the pages of Plato, and ennoble by their
presence so many fine English poems, is
to insure genial and humane thinking
when years shall have brought the philo-
sophic mind. Yet the wisdom of allow-
ing such delightful studies to be erected
into a volume is not so clear. In-
deed, the book seems to fall between
the academic and literary stools. "Its
method," says Mr. Harrison, " is purely
critical. It has not attempted to treat
the subject from the standpoint of the
individual poet, but has tried to inter-
pret the whole body of English poetry
of the period under survey as an integral
output of the spiritual thought and life
of the time." Unluckily the " purely
critical " method is not justified in the
result. The book is disabled for both
HARRISON. New York : The Columbia Uni-
versity Press. (The Macmillan Co.) 1903.
Books New and Old.
125
the scholarly and the general reader by
lack of perspective and of definition.
Spenser and John Norris are mentioned
in the same breath, despite the century
of changing ideals between them. Henry
More, an interesting man, but one of
the most lamentable of poets, is made
to bulk as large as Sidney ; yet Joseph
Beaumont, the 40,000 lines of whose
Psyche was one vast fabric of Platouism,
is not mentioned at all. Save in the
preface, nothing is said of those Conti-
nental forces from which English Pla-
tonism can never be disentangled, and
there is no account at all of any of those
personal groups and influences on which
the actual life of any Platonism has
always depended. To a purely critical
book the lack of definition is a more
serious drawback. No clear distinction
is made between the theoretical and
almost systematic Platonism which ap-
peared in the poetry of the period, and
the more intimate Platonism of mood
which has never been absent from the
poetic temperament ; nor is any line of
cleavage laid down between Platonism
proper, and Cabbalism, Cartesianism,
Rosicrucianism, Catholic mysticism, and
the hundred other isms too tedious to
mention, which engaged the men of those
moody and unquiet times. It is a pity
that so much detraction must be made
from an earnest book which contains
many interesting poetical extracts, some
pages of excellent expository writing,
and a useful bibliography, yet it is im-
portant that persons having authority in
such matters should consider the dangers
which beset the belletristic student when
he ventures upon the strange seas of
philosophic thought.
An interesting volume for collateral
reading with Mr. Harrison's book is Mr.
Cooke's anthology of Transcendental po-
etry.1 It is a workmanlike compilation
made with information and taste. It
1 The, Poets of Transcendentalism. Edited by
GEORGE WILLIS COOKE. Boston and New
York : Houghton, Mifflin & Co. 1903
presents a striking racial embodiment of
the Platonic mood in poetry, and offers
some curious points of similarity and
opposition to the specimens of Platoniz-
ing poetry furnished by Mr. Harrison.
The Transcendental poets themselves
would have disclaimed the analogy ; for
Platonism was but a drop in the vast
bucket of their omniscience. They ac-
cepted the universe, and all one to them
were
' ' The grand and magnificent dreamers ;
The heroes and mighty redeemers ;
The martyrs, reformers, and leaders ;
The voices of mystical Vedas."
Yet considering their poetry as a finished
product, its spiritual sense of life — its
constant sense of the unity and sempi-
ternity of beauty — makes it more com-
parable to the body of English Platonic
poetry than to any similar body of verse
in the world, not excepting the flights of
the German Transcendental lyre. On the
other hand, the racy, indigenous qual-
ity of the verse which Mr. Cooke has
collected makes a difference as strik-
ing as the likeness. Where the typical
Platonizing poem is florid with imagery
drawn from the beauties of sky and
meadow and the female sex, the typical
Transcendental poem is as scrawny and
pungent as a rock-rooted pine. Indeed,
poetic Transcendentalism seems almost
the cult of the pine ; and there are few
stanzas, and fewer poems, in Mr. Cooke's
books, that do not allude to it. We
hear a great many such ejaculations as
this : —
" 0 tall old pine ! 0 gloomy pine !
O grim gigantic gloomy pine !
What is there in that voice of thine
That thrills so deep this heart of mine ? "
Yet there is as fine poetic impressiveness
in the poet's suggestion that in the sigh-
ing of the pines he catches a sound of
" The soul's unfathomable sea,
The ocean of eternity,"
as in Vaughan's
" I saw eternity the other night
Like a great Ring of pure and endless light."
126
Books New and Old.
In both the English Platonics and the
American Transcendentalists there was
a growing tendency toward artificiality ;
the lesser men constantly tended to accept
as mere current counters the phrases and
images which the leaders had used to ex-
press real emotions and sincere thoughts.
In the long run the Transcendentalists
fall far behind the Platonists not only in
the music and color of their verse, but
in elan and suggestiveness as well. Yet
when it becomes a question of which set
of poets concealed the ink-horn more suc-
cessfully the advantage goes the other
way. The Platonist poets were largely
young men in libraries or courts or tap-
rooms, and most of them died young.
The Transcendental poets were of both
sexes ; they seem, when out of the pul-
pit or parlor, to have been walking
woodland roads. We discover from Mr.
Cooke's biographical notes that few of
them failed to weather threescore and ten,
while many of them — half a century
after the flowering of their school — still
survive at an even more advanced and
honorable old age. F. G.
WE do well to cherish the remains,
Two Books wnether recorded or legend-
afcout New ary, of our Colonial phase. It
England. .
is pleasant to feel that, with all
our youthfulness as a nation, we have a
local past of some venerableness. It did
not express itself in any form of art, but
we have ceased to take for granted on this
account that Virginian life was all laxity
and unintelligence, or Puritan life all
primness and fanaticism. Fiction has
done much of late to invest the Colonial
period with a romantic glamour ; but our
new sense of its mellowness and com-
pleteness we owe rather to the diligence
which keeps unearthing and classifying
old chronicles, town records, legal docu-
ments, journals, and letters.
To this useful order belong our two
1 The Romance of Old New England Churches.
By MABY C. CRAWFORD. Boston : L. C. Page
& Co. 1903.
books.1 The reader who has an eye for
such chronicles will remember Miss Craw-
ford's recent Romance of Old New Eng-
land Roof-Trees. It was a much less
sentimental book than its title led one to
suppose, a piece of simple, clear, readable
annal-writing. The present book is of
the same sort. In this case, also, the
title fails to suggest the exact nature of
the contents. The narrative concerns
itself little with the history of churches,
though here and there interesting data
are presented in compact form, in con-
nection, for instance, with King's Chapel,
the Old South Church, Old Trinity, and
other churches as old though less widely
known. But the book will not be mainly
acceptable for its data. The chapters,
most of them, chronicle the varied lives
of certain members of the old ecclesias-
tical aristocracy of New England. It
is pleasant to note how much more satis-
faction the writer takes in dealing with
the experiences of Elizabeth Whitman or
Esther Edwards or Samuel Sewall, than
in recording the history of church organ-
izations, sites, and edifices. Her treat-
ment of these themes is historical rather
than literary. She does not fail to sug-
gest her interpretation of the incidents
which she records, but her main purpose
is to make the record ; yet, as is not un-
commonly the reward of such an effort,
the literary quality of her work is the
sounder for being less fanciful.
Old Paths and Legends of New Eng-
land is a much more bulky and compen-
dious book. It is, indeed, a little too
bulky and heavy to serve, as it might
otherwise admirably serve, as a way-
book for Massachusetts, Rhode Island,
and New Hampshire. The large num-
ber of illustrations are responsible for its
size and weight ; but they need not be
ashamed of the responsibility. They are
as good pictures as can be made by the
reproduction of good photographs, and
Old Paths and Legends of New England. By
KATHARINE M. ABBOTT. New York and Lon-
don : G. P. Putnam's Sons. 1903.
The Meaning of Rhode Island.
127
are really a valuable supplement to the
text. Each chapter deals jvith some his-
toric town, concisely, yet not mechani-
cally, matters of guidebook information
being relegated to a separate note under
the heading " Landmarks." The text
is spirited and intelligent. It contrives,
in presenting many facts, to preserve
their value in perspective, and, a more
difficult thing, to suggest the emotion
inherent in old places and structures
which, only less convincingly than the
written word, embody the past for us.
A New Englander may harbor a preju-
dice against sightseeing and still be un-
able to lay down this book without an
impulse to look up some of the ancient
haunts, which, it reminds one, lie well
within a Sabbath day's trolley of the
home-spot. This is to say that the vol-
ume is particularly worth the care of the
pilgrim from Chicago or Oklahoma who
wishes to do the East and not be done
by it.
The reasonable and sympathetic spirit
in which the author has undertaken her
task is well suggested by the opening sen-
tences of her Preface : " Once upon a
time it might have been said, ' Who
knows an American town ? ' . . Some
travellers thought we were too young to
be interesting ; others, in the words of
the Old Play, directed their search ' to
farthest Ind in. search of novelties,'
blinking owl-like at ' ten thousand ob-
jects of int'rest wonderful ' before their
very thresholds, arid even the most inde-
fatigable lovers of America became dis-
couraged by difficulties in the way of
travelling almost insurmountable. The
American found it a far more simple
affair to journey with the immortals from
Loch Katrine to Mont Blanc than to
follow the course of Whittier's Merri-
mack with its sheaf of legends from
source to sea. To-day . . . our history-
loving countryman, with his favorite vol-
ume in his pocket, may step down by the
wayside from the wheel, the electric car,
or automobile, and explore some little
stream to the spot where the grist-mill's
wheel turns still, and, in the hand-made
nails of a primitive garrison, live over
again, as it were, his great-great-great-
grandfather's experiences."
With such a traveler this volume
might well be a chosen favorite. It
will not go into his pocket, but perhaps
a lighter and more compact edition may
follow. H. W. B.
THE MEANING OF RHODE ISLAND.1
" THE meaning of Rhode Island " im-
plies a problem, the solution of which is
attempted in every comprehensive work
on American history, but which still re-
1 Rhode Island, its Making and its Meaning,
1636-1683. By IRVING BEBDINE RICHMAN,
with an Introduction by JAMES BBYCE. Two
volumes. New York : G. P. Putnam's Sons.
1902.
State of Rhode Island and Providence Plan-
tations at the End of the Century. A history [by
CLARENCE SAUNDERS BRIGHAM] edited by
EDWARD FIELD. Three volumes. Boston and
Syracuse : Mason Publishing Company. 1 902.
mains a problem to those who are trying
to understand the past and the present of
this puzzling little commonwealth. The
circumstances which led to the founding
Correspondence of the Colonial Governors of
Rhode Island, 1723-1775. Edited by GER-
TRUDE SELWYN KIMBALL, for the Colonial
Dames of America in Rhode Island. Two vol-
umes. Boston and New York : Houghton, Mif-
flin & Co. 1902.
Harris Papers [with an Introduction by
IRVING B. RICHMAN and Notes by CLARENCE
S. BRIGHAM]. Collections of the Rhode Island
Historical Society, X. Providence. 1902.
128
The Meaning of Rhode Island.
of the colony, and the conditions under
which it developed during the second
quarter of the seventeenth century, were
most exceptional. To no other American
community were offered such opportuni-
ties for experimenting with the theories of
democratic government, along the lines
in which progress has been made toward
freedom for the individual and power for
the body politic. Bancroft, picturing the
development of the nation with the eye
of a painter seeking the general effect,
and Charles Francis Adams, sketching
the details with realistic accuracy, alike
see in Rhode Island the original sugges-
tion for more of the ideas which are em-
bodied in the present scheme of govern-
ment for the United States than in any
other of its constituent parts. Such a
reputation demands that the history of
this state shall be made known, so as to
reveal why these ideas originated there,
how they were experimented with, and
what led to their ultimate acceptance by
the nation.
The annals of Rhode Island's forma-
tive years have been set forth with abun-
dance of detail, and their record shows
clearly that the men who projected the
first settlements on Narragansett Bay
fully appreciated their opportunities.
They deliberately prepared the founda-
tions for a society in which the members
might enjoy the utmost individual liberty
in civil and social as well as in religious
affairs. It is such a society as exists
to-day, more than anywhere else, in the
United States of America ; which was
made possible, and which was on the
verge of coming into being, in the settle-
ments at Providence and Aquidneck in
1640. The story of those two commu-
The Fourth Paper presented by Major Butler,
wi'h other Papers edited and published by Eager
Williams in London, 1652. With an Introduc-
tion by CLARENCE SAUNDERS BRIGHAM. Prov-
idence : The Club for Colonial Reprints. 1903.
The Early Records of the Town of Providence,
Vol. XVII. Town Papers, 1682-1722. Prov-
idence : Record Commissioners. 1903.
The Early Records of the Town of Portsmouth,
nities during the five years preceding that
date is in many respects unsurpassed in
interest or importance by any equal
period of Colonial history. It has re-
ceived from historical writers the atten-
tion it so fully merits. No community,
however, and least of all an independent
commonwealth, is entitled to be judged
by a single half decade of its career.
The friends of " Little Rhody " are far
from asking for any such limitation of
judgment. The temptation is never-
theless very strong for the historian to
look at the succeeding years through the
halo created by the ideas which domi-
nated that formative period. Even Mr.
Richman, searching for the truth with
the broad outlook of a dweller on the
prairies beyond the Mississippi, is carried
by the impulse of the idyllic begin-
nings through half a century of rancorous
squabblings over land and bloody alterca-
tions about cattle, of bitter theological
recrimination and hypocritical neglect of
social safeguards. Rhode Island's part
in the making of the United States is less
significant than is her contribution to the
more important history of human society ;
and the meaning of this must be sought
in the periods beginning where it would
be more agreeable to leave the story of
colony and state.
Rhode Island has suffered because of
the reputation given her by writers who
have formed their opinions without taking
into account two essential factors, — the
development of similar ideas contempo-
raneously in other parts of the world,
and the relation between what her peo-
ple have said and what they have done.
Roger Williams was in a remarkable de-
gree, to quote Mr. Richman's admirable
edited by the librarian of the Rhode Island
Historical Society [C. S. BRIGHAM]. Provi-
dence, for the State. 1901.
The Dorr War, or the Constitutional Struggle
in Rhode Island. By ARTHUR MAY MOWRY.
Providence : Preston & Rounds. 1901.
The Finances and Administration of Provi-
dence. By HOWARD KEMBLE STOKES. Balti-
more : The Johns Hopkins Press. 1903.
The Meaning of Rhode Island.
129
phrase, " the exponent in America of
the time - spirit of Toleration." Mr.
Brigham, the librarian of the state His-
torical Society, in his essay on a tract
which Williams published in London in
1652, presents abundant evidence to
prove that the founder of Rhode Island
was one of a large company of English-
men,— undoubtedly well-nigh the fore-
most among them, — with Milton and
Cromwell and a score of others, who be-
lieved as thoroughly as he did in the right
of all men to have their own opinions re-
garding the best way of worshiping God.
The others realized, as Williams, despite
his exceptional opportunities for observ-
ing the theory in practice, apparently
never realized, that most people in 1650
were not sufficiently sure of their own
opinions to disregard in every-day life
the opinions of their neighbors. Roger
Williams also failed to perceive that the
Englishmen who joined him in settling
Rhode Island were among those most
deeply imbued with the "time-spirit,"
and that they, better than he, understood
its full import. Mr. Richman shows
with much skill that it was not Williams,
but the general body of settlers, their
ideas shaped by constant friction, who
developed the practical conception of
individual freedom for opinions regard-
ing social and political, as well as reli-
gious matters. A great deal of gratitude
is due to the founders of Rhode Island
who put these ideas, which had been
agitating men's minds all over Europe
for a hundred years, to the test of actual
experiment. The experience and the
example of Rhode Island were kept con-
stantly in mind by those who were re-
sponsible for the administration of the
neighboring colonies, and they, and the
nation which they founded, profited in-
estimably by the lessons taught by Rhode
Island.
It is surprising that Mr. Richman,
keenly in touch as he is with contempo-
rary tendencies in historical study, did
not take advantage of his opportunity to
VOL. xcin. — NO. 555. 9
depart from the traditional notion that
the ideas of the founders constitute the
substance of Rhode Island's history.
The theories practiced by Roger Wil-
liams and his fellow settlers make up an
important chapter in the record of the
evolution of religious, political, and social
ideas. It is a chapter to which Mr.
Richman contributes some noteworthy
additions, chief of which is his explana-
tion of what became of Williams, theo-
logically, after his brief mental sojourn
with the Baptists. The passages by
which he is traced to the Seekers, a sect
among whom he became a leader in the
quest for something believable, are
among the best in Mr. Richman's many
brilliant pages. But the true meaning
of Rhode Island, its important contribu-
tion to the history of institutions and of
society, is to be found, not in these ideas,
but in the use which has been made of
them. Rhode Island had a start in-
comparably more favorable for the de-
velopment of democratic institutions than
any other of the communities out of
which has grown this freest of repub-
lics. She has still a reputation for free-
dom in speech and action beyond any of
her neighbors. It is, according to the
repeated statements of the man whom
the people of the state have elected to
be their governor, the freedom which
tends to license and libertinism. These
statements, and the current daily news
from Rhode Island, are curiously sig-
nificant commentary upon two facts in
her earliest history. Providence organ-
ized itself into a government absolute-
ly without control, restraint, or guidance
from beyond its own narrow limits, and
such control as its neighbors undertook to
impose was successfully rejected. New-
port, organized under similar external
conditions, began its career by selecting
as its first governor one of the richest
men of his time in English America.
Students of society and of political organi-
zation are fairly entitled to information
regarding the way in which the existing
130
The Meaning of Rhode Island.
state of affairs has developed out of the
seed planted by Roger Williams, Wil-
liam Coddington, and Samuel Gorton.
The chapters of Rhode Island history
which need to be written will deal with
the periods associated with the names
of William Harris and John Clarke, the
governors Wanton, Hopkins, and Ward,
and Thomas W. Dorr. Material addi-
tions to an understanding of each of
these periods have recently been made,
and more will, follow when the long-ex-
pected work of Mr. Sidney S. Rider ap-
pears, wherein there are likely to find
expression more of the distinctive char-
acteristics of Rhode Island than in any-
thing that has yet been printed.
Rhode Island is essentially a problem
in social organization. Its beginnings,
unprecedented in ideals and opportuni-
ties, were sadly like those of other fron-
tier settlements in personnel. As the
growth of the surrounding colonies shut
it in, the aggressive qualities developed
by frontier responsibilities disappeared.
Rhode Island after a few years became
a sort of back water, an eddy into which
was gathered the flotsam cast off by the
main current of New England life. A
large proportion of the population of
Rhode Island in its earlier days appears
to have been made up of those who had
not succeeded in making a place for them-
selves in the other colonies. Harris, de-
scribed by Williams as " an impudent
Morris dancer in Kent," who, under a
very ragged " cloak of separation, got in
with myself," was doubtless a fair speci-
men of the crowd that flocked toward
the new settlements at Providence and
Portsmouth. At Portsmouth, where the
followers of Mistress Hutchinson built
the first houses on the island at the
mouth of Narragansett Bay, the unruly
ne'er-do-wells became so large a major-
ity that most of the first-comers, who
had been men of substance and stand-
ing in Boston, withdrew and chose new
homes for themselves at the less fertile
Newport. In Providence, the lawless
members of the community, who refused
to vote taxes and resisted execution of
the decrees of town meeting with blud-
geon and flint-lock, were driven out after
a bitter struggle, to resettle down the bay
toward Warwick, or deep in the Paw-
tuxet woods.
Newport, settled by men of property,
and so situated that unusual diligence
was necessary to secure a livelihood, soon
became a prospering seaport. It is, in
consequence, Newport which represents
Rhode Island in external dealings
throughout the pre-Revolutionary period.
This fact is made very clear by the two
volumes of letters to and from the govern-
ors and the agents who represented the
colony in London, edited by Miss Kim-
ball, for the Colonial Dames of America
in Rhode Island. These volumes are
like a breath of Newport's own refresh-
ing sea air to the reader who turns their
pages after a sitting with the town meet-
ing records of disputes about land and
cattle, of bastardy and divorce, tax-dodg-
ing and log-rolling, and the other details
which engrossed the local Solons. The
mercantile interests of Newport con-
trolled the Colonial administration down
to the middle of the eighteenth century,
and even after the increasing wealth of
the northern capital enabled it to com-
pete for the rural vote — the cash price
of which was as well known in 1760 as
in 1903 — the Newporters continued to
direct the policy of the colony in its deal-
ings with the English authorities. The
natural result is that the letters of the
London agents show that, so far as they
were concerned, Rhode Island was very
much like the other colonies of New
Hampshire and New Jersey. They were
alike slow in making payment for long
past services, equally liable to sudden
and unreasonable contradictions in giv-
ing instructions whenever temporary ad-
vantages loomed before the Provincial
legislators, and equally averse to furnish-
ing data concerning their local commerce
and industries. The agents' letters re-
The Meaning of Rhode Island.
131
veal a most interesting phase of Colonial
life, the importance of which has only
come to be recognized since historical
students awoke to the fact that the
American settlements were an integral
portion of the British kingdom, directly
affected by European political changes,
and vitally concerned with the commer-
cial news from Lisbon, Copenhagen, and
Marseilles.
In the commercial and industrial life
of Rhode Island lay the hope for its fu-
ture. Therein was dormant whatever of
public spirit the colony possessed. The
example of Coddington, scheming to or-
ganize a government wherein he might
wear all the gold lace, and of Harris,
anxious to serve any interest, for or
against the colony he had helped to es-
tablish, provided he could thereby in-
crease the value of his landed posses-
sions, sank deep into the popular imagi-
nation and still dominates the standards
of a large part of the community. Pub-
lic spirit implies education, which means
expenditure without immediate visible
return, and to this the earlier inhabitants
of town as well as country were immov-
ably opposed. Rhode Island was settled
by men who were unwilling to pay for
the religious teaching desired by a ma-
jority of the people among whom they
had been living. Most of them pos-
sessed each his own religion, sufficient
unto himself, and they quickly acquired
an indisposition to contributing toward
any sort of merely spiritual service for the
community as a whole. Public spirit has
existed from the beginning, and as com-
mercial prosperity increased it becomes
evident more and more frequently against
the background of popular indifference
regarding posterity. Before the Revolu-
tion, Hopkins in Providence and Red-
wood in Newport established libraries
which continue to exert an active influ-
ence on the intellectual life of these
cities. Manning was guaranteed a liv-
ing in order that a school might be set
up in Warren. Nicholas Brown & Co.
agreed to pay all the bills for erecting
the college edifice in Providence, when it
became certain that many of the sub-
scribers toward the cost of the build-
ing were expecting to evade their obliga-
tions. Members of the same firm of
" the Four Brothers," when the Boston
Port Bill threw the Massachusetts me-
chanics out of work, engaged them to
put up the famous First Baptist Meeting
House, " for the worship of God and to
hold Commencement in," which is still
the pride of Providence. There is to-
day no lack of evidence of generous, pub-
lic-spirited willingness to do everything
for the public except trust it politically.
The fault is obviously with the people,
who do not care about being trusted,
doubtless because they do not trust them-
selves. From the standpoint of the po-
litical theorist, the need of Rhode Island
to-day, quite as much as when Dorr be-
gan his " rebellion," is a modern consti-
tution of democratic government. Prac-
tically, this is insignificant in comparison
with the need for citizens who care
whether their governor closes gambling
houses and stops the playing of policy.
The " lively experiment " of Roger Wil-
liams succeeded for a time because the
people who made up his community did
not care what other folks thought so long
as each could do as he or she liked. It
afterwards failed, in the opinion of many,
because most persons object to living in
the neighborhood of those who are likely
to do extremely disagreeable things. The
outcome is a commonwealth which is still
trying to solve the problem of how to
prevent the doing of things that are un-
pleasant and unprofitable to the body
politic, without the use of compelling
force. Rhode Island continues to be a
very lively experiment, carried on by
the lineal and spiritual descendants of
Williams and Harris and Gorton and
Arnold and John Clarke and Mary Dyer,
and the thousands of others who have
followed them out from Massachusetts,
— and its full meaning is yet to be told.
132
The, Contributors' Club.
THE CONTRIBUTORS' CLUB.
To add anything to Mr. Crothers's in-
. H valuable pleafor theprotection
able Point of of ignorance would seem to
Ignorance. ^Q ag unfi^ing as to attach
footnotes to Charles Lamb. I shrink
from doing it, but a hardened missionary
spirit within me makes me yearn that his
message should prevail to the largest pos-
sible extent. I fear that too many will
look upon his delightful achievements in
not knowing too much, long for the same
freedom and happiness, and then fall back
discouraged again into the old ways, as
defenseless against knowledge as poor
Robert Elsmere was said to have been
against the truth.
Mr. Crothers has lifted up the vision.
Our hearts have gone out to it and been
lifted up to it, but when we came back
to the common life again we hardly
knew how to go to work to keep the
vision permanent. Of the actual disci-
plines which are to produce in others his
own freedom Mr. Crothers has hardly a
word to say. He acts as if it were per-
fectly easy and perfectly feasible for
any one to be ignorant, and as if all one
has to do is to let himself go. Not so
easily, however, does one escape from the
lifelong habit of knowledge. It would
have been kinder had he furnished us a
few hints as to how to begin. I have be-
gun, and should my experience be of
use to others it is freely offered.
I was looking about for some good
chance to begin over again, and I found it.
It was New Zealand. It was the only
subject I could think of which could be
taken in time. It was the only one which
so far had not intruded on me to the
point of making ignorance ever after
impossible. Without the least intention
I had gotten implicated in the China
business before I was aware of it, and it
is now too late to withdraw. I cannot
shake off what I know of China, — it
has gotten a right of way in me, and I
am resigned to it. No one knows what
I have suffered from the Philippines.
Five years ago I should have said that
of all things in this world the Philip-
pines were the least likely ever to invade
my ignorance, but now I can never hope
to shake them off. I shall go through
life knowing about the Philippines. I
have no use for them, but must act as if
I had. Our old religious weekly, which
for years had been a faithful protector
of ignorance, suddenly capitulated to the
enemy and went over. After that we
were fortunate to get off with one edi-
torial a week on these distant islands.
We now speak of the paper at our house
as The Philippine Weekly. Occasion-
ally the editor gives us something of the
old sort, but it is manifest that he does
not like it. Henceforth my mental
background is full of unwelcome bolo-
men and friars and tariffs. Nothing
can be done about it now.
But New Zealand is my providential
opportunity, and with gratitude I take it.
I am determined not to know anything
about New Zealand. New Zealand
shall have a fair chance. My mistake
hitherto has been in supposing that my
ignorance would take care of itself,
hence I was always endangering it and
risking it here and there too carelessly.
Now I know that one must watch it with
all diligence as too good a thing to be
left to chance. Whenever, therefore, I
see anything about New Zealand I say
to myself, " Now is the time to put your
professions and aspirations to the test,"
and I deliberately turn away. Tempta-
tion comes to me in many forms, but I
remain resolute. No matter if nearly
everybody in our club does know about
it, what is that to rne ? Ignorance ought
to cost something. There are weeks in
which it seems as if the whole magazine
The Contributors' Club.
133
and newspaper world were in a conspir-
acy to make New Zealand gain a foot-
ing in my soul. At such times I fight
it off hour by hour, as the mariner does
the storm, and when after a day of it a
fine glow suffuses my soul, as I go down
to join the family at dinnei-, they wonder
what has happened to me. But, alas, it
would be useless to tell them, for such
things are best confessed only to " the
great congregation." I could never get
any of my family to believe that it cost
me anything to remain ignorant. They
suspect nothing of what I suffer.
Once or twice I have recklessly imper-
iled all. In a moment of wool-gathering
one evening I had allowed a friend of
sociological tendencies to get going with-
out noticing what he was about. I was
trimming the wick at the time, and when
I sat down I found him launched out
into a full course of the wonders of New
Zealand. I shut my inward ears and
professed to be bored, when in reality I
was frightened. Finally, I said that I was
not interested in New Zealand. A so-
ciological friend needs no more than this
to set him going. " What," said he,
" are n't you interested in the finest
specimen of economic freedom and cour-
age in the world ? " " Not a bit," I re-
plied. Then, scornfully, " What are you
interested in, may I ask ? " That par-
ticular day I had been dwelling with
profound delight upon Charles Lamb's
aunt at Calne, whom he had never seen
engaged in any more arduous occupa-
tion than dropping large beans into a
fair basin of cool water, and I confessed
it. When he recovered his speech he
asked if it was not true, as he had
heard, that I once had an uncle living
in Australia. This was true, but I cut
off this method of approach by telling
him of a native in the backwoods of
Connecticut who, on hearing that I
came from Bangor, said he thought we
ought to get on finely together as he was
well acquainted up in those parts, hav-
ing a daughter living in Fitchburg, and
five or six sisters buried in Prince Ed-
ward Island.
On another occasion I nearly suc-
cumbed to temptation through my in-
nate love of what Dean Stanley called
an ecclesiastical curiosity. It was just
a line in some paper, which began by
stating that in New Zealand there was a
movement toward the union of Presby-
terians and Congregationalists. There
I stopped and painfully examined my
resolutions. Had the tempter caught
me at last ? If it had been a scientific
announcement that at last some way had
been discovered of blending oil and vine-
gar, it would have left me without sur-
prise, because I was accustomed to the
thought that in nature almost anything
was possible ; but when it was a case
of two kinds of ecclesiastical oil being
coaxed into unity, I confess it was a
great temptation to go on and know
more no matter what happened. But I
turned toward another page, and to this
day remain guiltless of any knowledge
as to the reunion of our brothers in Aus-
tralia.
What Mr. Crothers speaks of so gen-
tly and winningly is heroic business down
at the bottom. It demands ways and
means coolly planned and relentlessly
carried out. I thought to drift pleasant-
ly into it, but found that for me the only
way to it was strenuously to let New
Zealand remain new. It is only a be-
ginning, yet it has made me feel that I
have read the fine essay on The Honor-
able Points of Ignorance as Augustine
advises when he says, " So read that you
may deserve to understand."
I AM told concerning one of the plays
The Waning now running in New York
Art Of Making . °
Believe. that the piano that appears
upon the stage in the third act is a real
one, that the silver service is marked
sterling, and that the books on the
shelves are the literature of the genuine
library. I can see for myself that the
children who scamper about the play-
room in the first act are real children,
134
The Contributors' Club,
and within a year or two of the age for
which they are dressed. The acme of
realism is achieved in the properties,
and if the acting sometimes fails to con-
vince, the background is irreproacha-
ble. For my part, I rather like this
honest, downright method of creating
atmosphere for a play, and I judge that
most of my companions among theatre-
goers also like it. We have the feeling
of the child whose Christmas doll turns
out to have in its wardrobe an umbrella
and a mackintosh, and a pair of bona
fide rubbers to protect its impervious
feet. We are conscious of a sense of
superiority over our neighbor who at-
tends plays in which wobbling walls are
shaken by the slightest tap upon the
equally uncertain door, in which the
jewels are paste, and the silver is some-
thing worse than pewter. Thus it is
that we are being trained by those who
provide our pleasures to scorn shams
and rejoice in the lovely truth. One
doubt only is occasionally whispered by
the still small voice of my mind in the
presence of these aids to sincerity. Ai'e
we possibly in danger of losing thereby
a very precious possession, our happy
faculty for making believe ? I remem-
ber a servant who came from the lower
order of Irish peasantry, and who upon
reaching this country was obliged to
learn how to walk upstairs. The same
atrophy of function has been discovered
in children born in apartment houses,
and raised and lowered by the public
elevator. And then I recall the dolls
of my childhood, made out of rags, with
mouths indicated by a red cotton thread.
They called forth all my power of trans-
muting prose of fact into poetry of feel-
ing. They may be said to have pre-
pared the way for my becoming in later
life that most imaginative of writers, —
a biographer. My fancy waxed as
sturdy upon their uncompromising sur-
faces as the puppy gnawing at his pi&ce
de resistance, a bone stripped of its
meat. I learned from them to use the
concrete as merely a symbol of the ab-
stract, and to work with my mind upon
the most uninspiring material. In those
days all my world was a stage and I the
only player. I composed theatrical per-
formances after the manner of children,
in which I was cast for the double role
of actor and audience. I remember that
the scene of one of my tragedies was laid
in the arctic regions, and for iceberg
and snowy plain I appropriated my
grandmother's parlor pier glass with a
marble slab at its base. It was the most
realistic of my properties.
In after years I went frequently to
melodramatic performances, and I found
that my practice in making believe stood
me in excellent stead. It was nothing to
me that the scenic backgrounds were as
wrinkled as the brow of old Polonius,
and that the solid earth rose and fell
like the waves of the sea at any gust of
air. The heroine's cotton velvet gown
was the emblem of elegance to my initi-
ated mind. There was no disillusion-
ment possible, as the illusion was sup-
plied by my faithful and trained imagi-
nation.
Now all this has changed. I have not
tried myself on dolls, but the other day
after an interval of many years I went
again to a melodrama. The theatre
teemed with sad and sweet associations.
I loved the signs upon the walls warn-
ing me that my seat ticket did not in-
clude a babe in arms, and that I must
not whistle or hang my wraps on the
balcony rail. When the good old cur-
tain went up and I saw the noble-hearted
sub-hero pacing the stage, inquiring in
stentorian tones what he could do to
save his friend, I could have wept in an
ecstasy of reminiscence. But there for
me it ended. As the play advanced I
found myself lazy and listless, unwilling
to take my part in the performance and
translate the whole shabby and super-
ficial show into sound reality and legiti-
mate art. And the fault was not chiefly
with the acting ; of that I am convinced.
The Contributors' Club.
135
The heroine had her moments of real
passion and her expressions of sincerity.
Certainly her poor young bones must
have ached with the thumping ardor of
the swoons which sent her crashing to
the floor in every second scene. As for
the hero, there were notes in his voice,
forced elocutionary notes, that I had
heard frequently enough in the little
theatre of the piano and the solid silver
service. But the " business " of the
stage was so stupidly false to life that
after a time I ceased even to be amused
by it. The scenery was so tawdry that
it bored me. The die cast by Irving
in his splendid settings had spoiled for
me the theatre of my youth. I was like
the formal city guest at the friendly coun-
try table, — stiffly unaccustomed to reach-
ing and passing, uncomfortably conscious
of missing the luxury of service. Cer-
tain critics assure me that this is my good
fortune, that my taste lias been elevated,
but I have my moments of indecision
when I mourn my ancient knack at mak-
ing believe.
A PUNSTER is an incipient poet ; a poet
The Punster mav we^ De a perfected pun-
and the Poet. ster- Charles Lamb was the
one, William Shakespeare was the other ;
and yet the man who makes a pun is rele-
gated to the ranks of those " who would
not scruple to pick a pocket." Scorners
of the pun have no right to self -congratu-
lation ; rather should they lament their
lack of appreciation of a very telling or-
der of genius. If the potential power of
the pun-maker were directed along artis-
tic lines he would very soon achieve dis-
tinction by reason of a gift desired by
all poets, and one that only a poet can
properly appreciate.
The link that unites the punster and
the poet is neither wit nor worth, but
words. These two do not meet in the
high realms of imaginative fervor, but on
a material, linguistic plane. The poet
loves to win from human speech its full-
est beauty and significance, he delights
in delicate discriminations, he lingers over
melodious and expressive turns of phrase.
So, also, does the punster ; is not he, too,
^twctilious in the use of language ?
What is a pun ? It is a perversion of
words, a willful interference with the so-
ber meaning of a word or phrase. Lamb
said of a certain man, " From his gravity
Newton might have deduced the theory
of gravitation." In this species of pun
we can see the whole relation of poet and
punster. The latter has a sensitive ear,
he is quick to notice resemblances be-
tween sounds, and on the rapidity of his
associative powers depends his success.
The more exact and close the purely ex-
ternal association of words, the mere skel-
eton of sound, and the more remote the
intellectual content and signification, the
greater the incongruity, the more ludi-
crous the pun.
Was not the instinct for puns, which
gives spirit to so much of the literature of
the Age of Elizabeth, simply a manifes-
tation of the poetic impulse of the time ?
Does it not represent for us one side of
the vigorous love of language, that exces-
sive pleasure in music and in harmonious
adjustment of letters ? Shakespeare was
an inveterate pun-maker, brilliant, euphu-
istic, delighting in chance allusions and
incongruous resemblances. His full and
rounded genius did not shrink from ver-
bal nonsense. In King Henry IV. how
he carries it to extremes.
Falstaff. . . . And, I prithee, sweet wag,
when thou art king, as, God save thy
grace, — majesty I should say, for grace
thou wilt have none, —
Prince. What, none ?
Falstaff. No, by my troth, not so much as
will serve to be prologue to an egg and
butter.
But the poets who make no puns, who
have none of that sensitive affection for
pure sound ! Are not our poorest makers
of rimes those who pun not ? They have
no ear for the softer correspondences,
the subtle cadence of the syllable. Can-
not the taste for well-sustained rimes be
learned from the punster who would cen-
sure such lines as these : —
136
The Contributors' Club.
" I saw her upon nearer view
A spirit, yet a Woman too !
A Creature not too bright or good
For human nature's daily food."
Let us withdraw the opprobrium we
have been pleased to attach to the pun-
ster. Indeed, let us establish a new
school of criticism of poetry, and have
rightfully associated with the serene lover
of wisdom the lover of puns, who has de-
voted his best and worst service to a
muse.
SINCE the Atlantic is not illustrated
"Handsomely (save in its advertisements) I
Illustrated." mav hope to find place in its
uniform pages for my quarrel with the
" handsomely illustrated." Being in pre-
carious relations with the editors of illus-
trated magazines, I prefer to exhibit my
views anonymously in the department of
Clever-Things-Guess- Who -Wrote - 'Em.
It is safer sometimes to fight with a
mask.
Illustrations include two sorts of pic-
tures, — those which decorate, and those
which elucidate. To pure ornaments no
one need object ; it is proper for any
book or magazine to bear designs on the
cover, and to contain illuminated initials,
tail-pieces, scrolls, swirls, and other fan-
ciful embellishments. My objection is
to most pictures the function of which is
indicated by the intellectual sense of the
word illustration.
In a novel of American society I find
both in the book and in the numbers of
the magazine which offered the story in
serial parts a dozen pictures " hand-
somely illustrating " the text. " She
smiled and looked up at him expres-
sively." Half-tone picture of her smil-
ing expressively. The picture does not
give a better idea of her smile or of his
manner of receiving it than the reader
could get from the printed words. Unless
the illustrator has had personal confer-
ence with the author he derives his idea
from the text just as the reader derives
his. " ' Good - evening,' he remarked,
removing his hat politely." Half-tone
drawing of a brick pavement on which
stands a young man with his hat held in
his right hand four inches from his hair.
In the story this polite incident is re-
counted by a few words tucked into the
narrative. It is a passing detail which
the illustrator has raised to the impor-
tance of a full page. The young man
may be worth looking at, but so he is in
that mental picture which the skill of the
writer has conjured forth in the mind of
the excited reader. Here, again, the il-
lustrator proceeds with no more certain
or ample knowledge than the author af-
fords to any human being who reads his
words. Indeed, the picture may hinder
perfect understanding, for the modern
illustrator frequently leaves his author
behind, and tracks off into the human wil-
derness in independent quest of the model
young man. The gesture as represented
in the picture has no significance ; neither
has the hat. We all know how hats are
removed. If the picture appeared in a
book of fashions, published by a mer-
chant tailor, the shape of the hat might
increase our grasp of the prevailing
styles. Possibly, too, the kind of hat de-
picted may tell us something of impor-
tance by indirect exposition. A silk hat
would indicate that the courteous episode
took place in the afternoon. An opera
hat would fix the time after six o'clock.
A derby hat might establish the hour
broadly between seven in the morning
and five in the afternoon. The signifi-
cance might be still deeper. A slouch
hat would indicate that the story is laid
in the South, or that the young man is
a college student. But here, again, we
should learn only facts which we could
descry by such scrupulous study of the
text as most of us devote to current fiction.
Illustrations have thorough value in
exemplifying printed information about
unknown things and unusual people. An
article on the compass should contain
both a diagram of the compass and a
good picture of the arrangement of a
The Contributors' Club.
137
compass on a real ship. A photograph
would be best because it would be accu-
rate, and with modern photographic im-
provements it might be beautiful and in-
teresting in itself. Similarly an essay
on Thibet should be illustrated with views
of the people, the houses, and the land-
scape. Likewise some Personal Reminis-
cences of George Washington and Abra-
ham Lincoln might be accompanied by
good portraits of those great men.
In addition, there is value in illustra-
tions of strange and difficult fiction. Sup-
pose an American magazine publishes an
expurgated story of modern French life,
in which occurs a fight between two of
the villains. " ' La-la-la ! ' cried Aston,
kicking Galphonse deftly behind the
ear." This needs an illustration. We
do not understand that kind of fighting.
The magazine should send to Paris a
staff of artists to get valid pictures of
typical footfights, and should publish a
good picture, carefully studied, whereby
we should see with full knowledge and
an understanding heart this thrilling en-
counter and know the technicalities of
the contest. The corresponding episode
in an American novel of Indiana life
would need no picture. "The big fel-
low was almost laid away by the left
hook jab, but negotiated heavily with his
right, and landed on the point of Percy
Frederick Billington's jaw." No picture
is necessary. Every true American,
every honest Englishman, would under-
stand that incident at the first flash of
the words.
In some other modern stories illustra-
tions are legitimate, especially in realis-
tic fiction, which is so perplexingly un-
real. I should like to own an illustrated
edition of Henry James for my wife and
children. The vague, interthreaded ab-
stractions would, under the touch of a
really great illustrator, solidify into vis-
ual actualities which any child could
apperceive — were he not enfolded by
the veil of a temperamental density, were
he not of a weakness relating to certain
ocular defects of heredity, which, had he
known it, would have deterred him, no
doubt, for a time, at least, from essaying
with show of hope of success any visual
activity whatsoever. The style is easy to
write, but difficult to read (propter hoc).
The illustrator who could depict James's
women probably does not exist. If he
could be found, what a benefactor would
he be of his race and generation.
The whole matter is clear. Decora-
tions should decorate ; illustrations should
illustrate. Other sorts of pictures re-
duce a book or a magazine to a mere
picture album.
THE Pilgrim Fathers. What words
The Pilgrim these are to conjure with, and
Fathers; i i i •
Their Debt how the modern conjurers,
to Us. historic, literary, and social,
have exercised that privilege ! From the
first epoch of our youth when we are sad-
dened by the recital of that poem which
pictures their landing amid " breaking
waves" upon a "rock -hound shore"
(from which all rocks save one have
strangely disappeared), through the times
when we are harassed by text-books tell-
ing of the forefathers' stay in Holland,
and why they failed to do it longer, and
on through all the entire Pilgrim's Pro-
gress, we are reluctantly conveyed. In
after years we focus our attention upon
their social, educational, and ethical con-
ditions, and our declining days are punc-
tuated by books regarding them, memo-
rials to them, societies commemorating
them under all phases and circumstances.
" Posthumous glory " has been defined
as " a revenue payable to our ghosts,"
and such a revenue we have paid gladly
and abundantly to those grim Pilgrim
ghosts. We have awarded them a wealth
of fame beyond the wildest dreams that
their imaginations might have formu-
lated.
We hear much of our debt to these
hardy and conscientious pioneers. We
have been trained to estimate our pre-
sent blessings, our country's vast posses-
sions, the land's prosperity, and then to
138
The Contributors' Club.
give thanks to Heaven and to the Pilgrim
Fathers.
What is our debt to them ?
In the first place, they came here to
suit themselves. They were dissatisfied
with their surroundings and wanted a
land where they could follow their own
sweet wills, and be quite free to order
others about and make them attend meet-
ing for as many hours at a time as they
saw fit. They did not come on our ac-
count. If any thought of us entered
their minds, it must have been formed
upon apologetic lines. They must have
realized the problems and perplexities
they were bequeathing us, helpless pos-
terity. In place of " merry England,"
arranged, mapped out, and in good run-
ning order, we had a wilderness, peopled
with savage tribes, in which to demon-
strate our right to " life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness."
Gratitude is most fittingly bestowed
on those who intentionally benefit their
kind, and not on those who do it inciden-
tally or accidentally.
What did the Pilgrim Fathers give us
intentionally ? Little compared with
that which they relinquished for us ;
even the admirable traits of character
which they bestowed were cultivated not
on our account, but rather as a kind of
fire insurance against an equatorial at-
mosphere in the hereafter ; and then the
other traits which formed our small in-
heritance, they were not much to be
desired. That stern intolerance, that
torturing New England conscience, that
self-repression, that jealous mistrust of
simple joy for its own sake ; all those and
similar possessions were our unasked-for
legacy. Is the debt vast or not, on our
side?
And how is it on theirs ?
What have we done for them ? We,
who had power to consign them to total
oblivion. We have immortalized them ;
glorified their aims and endeavors. In
song and story, in bronze and marble, we
have commemorated their most minute
concerns. We have erected innumerable
monuments to their memory. Our art
and literature are permeated with ap-
preciative tributes to these first comers.
No modern cruiser, or ocean greyhound,
may ever hope to vie with the fame of
that little boat that landed its valuable
cargo on Plymouth Rock. We may " re-
member the Maine " for a brief season
only, but we can never forget the May-
flower.
It were too difficult a task to enumer-
ate what we have done for these our
Pilgrim ancestors, we whom they intro-
duced to a rough country and then de-
serted, with small thought of our welfare,
leaving us to work out our own salvation
through very troublous times. We have
done them much credit, and have amply
bestowed the same upon them. We
have done all that any grateful posterity
may do in this free country, where we
have not the Chinese prerogative of en-
nobling our forefathers.
Each year a splendid gathering of
members of the New England Society
meets in the city of New York to cele-
brate that chilly and auspicious day
which brought the Pilgrim Fathers to
these shores. At every such assembly
eloquent tones voice our indebtedness to
those first immigrants. Is it not time
some voices were lifted to proclaim the
vastness of the debt which has accumu-
lated upon the Pilgrim Fathers' side ?
IN old literature life is compared to a
On Travel- journey, and wise men rejoice
to question old men because,
like travelers, they know the sloughs and
roughnesses of the long road. Men arose
with the sun, and toddled forth as chil-
dren on the day's journey of their lives,
and became strong to endure the heavi-
ness of noonday. They strived forward
during the hours of early afternoon while
their sun's ambition was hot, and now as
the heat is cooling they have reached the
crest of the last hill, and their road dips
gently to the valley where all roads end.
And on into the quiet evening, until, at
The Contributors' Club.
139
last, they lie down in that shadowed val-
ley, and await the long night.
This figure has lost its meaning, for
we now travel by rail, and life is now
expressed in terms of the railway time-
table. As has been said, we leave and
arrive at places, but we no longer travel.
Consequently, we cannot understand the
hubbub that Marco Polo must have caused
among his townsmen when he swaggered
home. He and his crew were bronzed
by the sun, were dressed as Tartars, and
could speak their native Italian with great
difficulty. To convince the Venetians of
their identity Marco gave a magnificent
entertainment, at which he and his offi-
cers received, clad in gorgeous Oriental
dresses of red satin. Three times dur-
ing the banquet they changed their
dresses, distributing the discarded gar-
ments among the guests. At last, the
rough Tartar clothing worn on their
travels was displayed and then ripped
open. Within was a profusion of price-
less jewels of the Orient, the gifts of
Kublai Khan of Cathay. The proof was
regarded as perfect, and from that time
Marco was acknowledged by his coun-
trymen, and loaded with distinction. And
it is neither the first time, nor the last,
that the flash of wealth has served as a
letter of introduction. When Drake re-
turned from the Strait of Magellan, and,
powdered, wigged, and beflunkied, told
his lies at fashionable London dinners,
no doubt he was believed. And his crew,
let loose on the beer-shops, gathered each
his circle of listeners, drank at his ad-
mirers' expense, and yarned far into the
night. It was worth one's while to be a
traveler in those times.
But traveling has fallen on evil days.
The greatest traveler now is the brake-
man. Next is he who sells colored cot-
ton. A poor third pursues health and
flees from restlessness. Wise men have
ceased to question travelers, except to in-
quire of the arrival of trains and of the
comfort of hotels.
To-day I am one thousand miles from
home. From my window the world
stretches massive, homewards. Even
though I stood on the most distant range
of mountains and looked west, still I
would look on a world that contained no
suggestion of home ; and if I leaped to
that horizon and to the next, the result
would be the same, — so insignificant
would be the relative distance accom-
plished. And here I am set down with
no knowledge of how I came. There
was a continuous jar and the noise of
motion. We passed a barn or two, I be-
lieve, and on one hillside animals were
frightened from their grazing as we
passed. There were cluttered streets of
several cities and villages. There was
a prodigious number of telegraph poles
going in the opposite direction, hell-bent
as fast as we, which poles considerately
went at half-speed through towns, for
fear of hitting children. The United
States was once an immense country, and
extended quite to the sunset. For con-
venience we have reduced its size, and
made it but a map of its former self.
Any section of this map can be unrolled
and inspected in a day's time.
In the books the children read is the
story of the seven-league boots, wonder-
ful boots, worth a cobbler's fortune. If
a prince is escaping from an ogre, if he
is eloping with a princess, if he has an
engagement at the realm's frontier and
the wires are down, he straps these boots
to his feet, and strides the mountains and
spans the valleys. For with the clicking
of the silver buckles he has destroyed the
dimensions of space. Length, breadth,
and depth are measured for him but in
wishes. One wish and perhaps a theat-
rical snap of the fingers, or an invoca-
tion to the devil of locomotion, and he
stands on a mountain top, the next range
of hills blue in the distance ; another
wish and another snap and he has leaped
the valley. Wonderful boots, these !
Worth a king's ransom. And this prince,
too, as he travels thus dizzily may remem-
ber one or two barns, animals frightened
140
The Contributors' Club.
from their grazing, and the cluttered
street of cities nested in the valley.
When he reaches his journey's end he
will be just as wise and just as ignorant
as we who now travel by rail in magic,
seven-league fashion. For here I am
set down, and all save the last half-mile
of my path is lost in the curve of the
mountains. From my window I see the
green-covered mountains, new to me this
morning, so different from city streets
with their horizon of buildings.
I fancy that, on that memorable morn-
ing when Aladdin's Palace was set down
in Africa after its magic night's ride
from the Chinese capital, a house-maid
must have gone to the window, thrown
back the hangings and looked out, as-
tounded, on the barren mountains, when
she expected to see only the courtyard
of the palace and its swarm of Chinese
life. She then recalled that the building
rocked gently in the night, and that she
heard a whirling sound as of wind.
These were the only evidences of the
devil-guided flight. Now she looked on
a new world, and the familiar pagodas
lay far to the east within the eye of the
rising sun.
There are summer evenings in my re-
collection when I have traveled the skies.
I and my pipe, and quiet companionship
which does not intrude on my fancies,
have landed from the sky's blue sea upon
the cloud continent, and traversed its
mountain ranges, its inland lakes, har-
bors, and valleys. Over their wind-swept
ridges we have gone, like gods watching
the world-change, seeing
" the hungry ocean gain
Advantage on the Kingdom of the shore,
And the firm soil win of the watery main,
Increasing store with loss and loss with store."
The greatest traveler that I know is
a little man, slightly bent, who walks with
a stick in his garden or sits passive in his
library. Other friends have boasted of
travels in the Orient, of mornings spent
on the Athenian Acropolis, of visiting
the Theatre of Dionysius, and of halloo-
ing to the empty seats that reechoed.
They warn me of this and that hotel,
and advise me concerning the journey
from London. The usual tale of travel-
ers is that Athens is a ruin. I have
heard it rumored, for instance, that the
Parthenon marbles are in London, and
that the Parthenon itself has suffered
from the " wreckful siege of battering
days ; " that the walls to the Piraeus con-
tain hardly one stone left upon another.
And this sets me to thinking, for my
friend denies all this with such an air
of sincerity that I am almost inclined
to believe his word against all the rest.
The Athens he pictures is not ruinous,
the Parthenon stands before him as it
left the hand of its sculptor Phidias.
The walls to the Piraeus stand high as
on that morning, now almost forgotten,
when Athens awaited the Spartan attack.
Men, women, and children have wiped
the sweat from their faces, as they lay
down their motley tools and surveyed
their work complacent. For him the Di-
onysian Theatre does not echo with tour-
ists' shouts, but gives forth the sound of
many-voiced Greek life. He knows, too,
the people of Athens. He walked one
day with Socrates along the banks of the
Ilissus, and afterward visited him in his
prison when about to drink the Hemlock.
It is of the grandeur of Athens and her
sons that he speaks, not of her ruins.
The best of his travels is that he buys no
ticket of Cook, nor, indeed, of any one,
and when he has seen the cities' sights, his
wife enters and says, " Is n't it time for
the bookworm to eat ? " So he has his
American supper in the next room over-
looking Attica, so to speak. Oh, there
are many ways of traveling, and my
brakeman's view from his box-car is not
the only view.
A Letter from England : The Issue of Protection.
141
A LETTER FROM ENGLAND: THE ISSUE OF PROTECTION.
I MAY be pardoned, I hope, for open-
ing the present letter by recalling the
fact — however immaterial — that last
January, when summarizing 1902, I
hazarded a reference to Protection as
one of two questions " rapidly stealing
upon us to the exclusion of all others,
the decision of which may be destined to
bring about more far-reaching changes
in our civic and commercial life than the
inventions or reforms of the century."
The dramatic fulfillment of this modest
prophecy, enacted by Mr. Chamberlain,
I cannot certainly pretend to have fore-
seen ; but, in writing to-day, there can
be no difference of opinion as to the pre-
dominance of the issue. In wisdom or
folly, for good or ill, we are inevitably
committed to a very searching and ex-
haustive inquiry into the situation.
Meanwhile, the particular manner in
which this crisis has been precipitated
involves us in one incidental element of
danger, and in another of no less signifi-
cant security. In the first place we may
wander, at least temporarily, from the
vital issue toward a too curious study,
or a too enthusiastic partisanship, of the
attitudes adopted and the characters dis-
played by individual statesmen. The
ex-Colonial Secretary, who shares with
the German Emperor a genius without
parallel for absorbing public attention,
has thrown himself in the face of Eng-
lish tradition with an impetuosity which
lends to his proposals a certain glamour
of knight-errantry. He declaims our
difficulties so fearlessly that he may
hurry us into the adoption of his panacea.
The middle position of Mr. Balfour is
too intellectual and too apparently tem-
porizing for the average mind to trust
its sincerity ; while the most zealous and
most thoughtful Free Traders can with
difficulty escape the suspicion of having
set their faith on shibboleths and of
out-Cobdening Cobden. Leader-writers
in support of the new commercialism
are forever crying out : " Free Trade
may be an ideal, but it is unattainable.
Trade has never been free, it is not free,
it cannot be free. Drop the moral atti-
tude and face facts." Thus they ignore,
and in time they may tempt us to forget,
that Free Trade — as taught by all econ-
omists — is no more an absolute theory
or dogma than Protection. Both are
practical policies or systems, " in one of
which the protective element is slight
and accidental, while in the other it is
considerable and avowed." We should
do well to avoid either catchword and
speak of " Tariff Reform," through the
investigation of which any given propo-
sal may be fairly stated and discussed on
its own merits.
But a compensating consequence of
the sensational denouement of the last
few months may be found in the precise
contrary of what it seems on the surface
to have produced. Though Mr. Cham-
berlain might be accused, with some show
of justice, of having split up the Tory
camp by his latest sortie as effectually
as he broke the ranks of Liberalism by
opposing Home Rule, it is by no means
improbable that his present campaign
may have the ultimate effect of restoring
to almost stable equilibrium the balance
of parties, on which our system of gov-
ernment is generally believed to depend.
The Home Rule rupture dislocated old
landmarks, and they were finally demol-
ished under the war fever. Unionism
has never been a healthy growth. But
we are confronted to-day — on Mr.
Chamberlain's initiative undoubtedly —
by a broad and definite parting of the
ways. We are face to face with a prob-
lem in which the genuine and tradi-
tional spirit of the Liberal is unflinch-
ingly opposed to the stout Tory. An
142
A Letter from jEngland : The Issue of Protection.
honest fight in the open field should
clear the air. Maybe even the Whigs
will find their feet again, and, once the
temporary confusions of nomenclature
are eradicated, we shall every one of us
know where we stand. The issue is
modern, inasmuch as it is essentially at
once imperial and commercial ; but the
most cherished of our national ideals
are equally involved, and a fair poll on
Protection would nail the electorate to
its colors.
On the eve of the struggle, perhaps,
amidst the clamor of tongues and the
hailstorm of political pamphlets, it may
not be immediately easy to discern why
the English peoples should have been
summoned, thus suddenly and imperi-
ously, to the settlement of a controversy
which in reality consists, as one of our
younger economists has written,1 of two
cries and four problems.
" The cries are, on the one hand, that
our national prosperity is threatened by
foreign competition, and, on the other,
that the fabric of imperial unity is crum-
bling away. The problems have refer-
ence to the desirability, or otherwise, of
the following suggestions : first, a return
to some form of general Protection, es-
pecially in the case of manufactured ar-
ticles ; secondly, a special and limited
application of Protection against the ag-
gressive action of Trusts and Kartels ;
thirdly, a modification of tariff policy,
designed to increase our power of bar-
gaining with other nations ; and, lastly,
a system of reciprocal preferential ar-
rangements within the British Empire."
Impartial judgment will probably in
a short time decide that the plea of ur-
gency based on these cries, by which
some of our protectionist friends have
tried to shout down opposition, is not
justified by facts. In the first place,
though trade statistics are formed from
very complicated detail of which the
significance may be variously interpret-
ed, the consensus of responsible opin-
1 The Riddle of the Tariff. By A. C. Pigou.
ion does not sanction either the vague
alarms of " depression " or the assump-
tion of alien underselling as its cause.
The common deduction is taken entirely
from import and export returns, where-
as " the richer a country becomes, the
greater in all probability will be the
disparity between advances in its real
wealth and prosperity and the upward
movement of its foreign trade." It is
obvious that, " in the limiting case of a
nation already rich enough to buy all
the foreign goods of which it has any
need, these latter figures will go no high-
ex-, however great the leaps and bounds
by which wealth continues to increase."
The second, that is the imperial, cry
of " Rocks ahead " may be silenced by
statements at once simple and convin-
cing. Amid much of certain evil, of
doubtful promise, recent events in South
Africa have at least proved beyond cavil
that the ties of sentiment between Great
Britain and her distant daughter-lands
are more than verbal. And through
the present crisis the leaders of Colo-
nial thought have been unanimous in de-
clarations that contain " no hint or sus-
picion of any anxiety to force a prefer-
ential market upon us as the price of
their continued loyalty."
If, then, we can rest assured that re-
form is not, in fact, immediately impera-
tive, it becomes possible to dispassionate-
ly investigate " certain rival schemes of
fiscal policy," which may still, of course,
for other reasons be desirable toward
our ultimate prosperity. And we may
further admit in passing, on the one
hand, that foreign protected competition,
like all trusts and dumping, is one of
the elements producing crises in com-
merce ; and, on the other, that all advan-
tages claimed for Protection have a far
greater appearance of cogency for young
and undeveloped countries (as trusts
have for new industries) than for those
of established status like our own.
Reverting to the four practical sugges-
tions named above, it will be easily rec-
A Letter from England : The Issue of Protection. 143
ognized that, while the first " has been
advocated only by irresponsible persons
upon grounds implying an imperfect un-
derstanding of economic analysis, " the
second and third are now admitted into
the official programme of Mr. Balfour
and his present Cabinet, while the fourth
presents the distinguishing item of Mr.
Chamberlain's personal campaign, the
chosen corner stone of the New Impe-
rialism.
The Prime Minister claims to " ap-
proach the subject from the free trade
point of view," 1 and, theoretically, the
proposal to increase our bargaining pow-
ers — by retaliation or concession —
does not involve the introduction of the
protection principle. Our present tariff
policy, aged twenty-five years, would
" confine that part of our revenue which
is derived from customs " (with one spe-
cial exception from which the protec-
tive element is eliminated by excise) " to
duties on commodities not produced at
all in the United Kingdom." It would,
therefore, seem feasible to open tariff ne-
gotiations in some quarters by raising or
lowering the duties on such commodities,
without in any way disturbing home in-
dustry. But to " compensate ourselves
for the harm done us by a given rise in
our own tariff, we should need to secure a
fall about equal to that rise in the tariff's
of all the world ; " a triumph of diplomacy
surely Utopian ; while retaliation would
be even more dangerous. On the con-
trary, we must remember that our free
trade policy has not tempted other na-
tions to any hostile discrimination. " It
has everywhere, and in all important par-
ticulars, secured for our goods ' most
favored nation ' treatment, — an advan-
tage of which there is no reason to sup-
pose that they are the least likely to be
deprived." And in practice it is almost
certain that " the conversion of the na-
tion to tariff bargaining would mean the
1 Economic Notes on Insular Free Trade.
By the Eight Hon. Arthur James Balfour,
M. P.
erection of a customs system under
which more than one British interest
benefited at the public expense."
Arguments for the principle of Pro-
tection, whether generally applied or lim-
ited to the attack on Trusts and Kartels,
are too intricate for full discussion within
the limits of this letter. Every one is
familiar with the outlines of the crusade
against the threatened encroachments of
foreign monopolists. It remains for the
English electorate to consider how far the
injury undoubtedly inflicted upon us by
the high customs duties of other nations
is really different in kind, or even in
degree, from any other form of "check
upon exchange ; " and whether it would
not, in fact^be increased by any " burden
we might ourselves put upon the inward
branch of our foreign trade," similar to
that now put by others upon the outward.
The protectionist can easily show that
small temporary benefits would accrue
from the erection of tariff walls to par-
ticular industries, or, more accurately, to
the capitalists controlling them ; but he
must prove that such a nursing of vested
interests will be permanently advanta-
geous to the community. He must main-
tain, in fact, what would seem contrary
to the laws of economy, that any deliber-
ately imposed artificial restraint of capi-
tal and labor from those occupations, to
which it is being impelled by the broad
economic forces of the time, would notpro-
duce a loss of total efficiency. Finally,
he must face the grave disadvantages
(if an advocate of limited Protection)
" which are bound to arise when or-
dinary human beings endeavor in prac-
tice to select the proper cases for inter-
vention, the right time for beginning it,
and, above all, the moment at which the
temporary duty ought to be removed ; "
since, once the protective element has
been introduced, powerful interests are
perennially opposed to any reductions.
" There are also to be apprehended those
evils other than material which Protec-
tion brings in its train, — the loss of
144 A Letter from -England : The Issue of Protection.
purity in politics, the unfair advantage
given to those who wield the powers of
jobbery and corruption, unjust distribu-
tion of wealth, and the growth of sinister
interests." 1
It is not difficult to see that Mr.
Chamberlain's preferential scheme in-
volves unlimited Protection, and, indeed,
presents the most natural and consistent
completion of the new policy. We can-
not give a preference to some without
taxing all ; we cannot effect anything
substantial for the Colonies by confin-
ing our action to goods not produced
at home. We shall be pledged to full
retaliation, because the Colonies have
plainly declared that any return con-
cessions from them to us will not take
the form of lower rates to the Mother-
land, but of higher to the foreigner.
Should an Imperial Fiscal Unity be
established, we may lose the " most fa-
vored nation " treatment as a retalia-
tion to Colonial action. Preferences,
therefore, can only be recommended by
evidence of very strong internal advan-
tages, which mostly vanish with a denial
of the urgency plea. They are commonly
also defended as the surest means of
encouraging the development of agri-
cultural resources, which, however, are
bound in nature to make rapid strides
whatever our attitude toward them ; and
for certain political considerations, which
will not bear close inspection. It is
said that a protected supply of food
within the Empire would be invaluable in
case of war ; but the emergency presup-
1 From a Letter to the Times, signed by four-
teen academic economists.
poses the hostility of all other markets ;
which is most improbable, for example,
in the case of the United States. It is
said that we must make any sacrifices to
secure the fighting service of our sons
" over the water ; " but, in fact, the diffi-
culties of adjustment between the Colo-
nies would be infinitely provocative of
friction, as they were in the first half of
the nineteenth century, and a cash nexus
may easily snap the thread of disinter-
ested affection. Here, more emphatically
than in any other form of Protection,
we dare not go back in case of failure.
" The old preferences of sixty years ago
were not done away without rousing very
bitter feeling among the Colonists. To
grant them a second time, and again to
withdraw them, would be scarcely possi-
ble without the risk of grave disaster.
There is at present no evidence of a ten-
dency on the part of the Empire to ' fall
to pieces and separate atoms ; ' but it is
doubtful if the same could be said, should
it ever come to be subjected to so severe a
strain as this."
Any one of the present schemes for
fiscal reform, or any compromise be-
tween all, more likely to override the
free trade tradition, is accompanied by
certain danger ; and it remains for the
protectionist to prove that evils exist de-
manding the change or amenable to the
remedy. Popular opinion sees that Pro-
tection must make food dearer. It is
not yet convinced that our commercial
difficulties are due to Free Trade, or that
a change of policy would secure us an
increase of wealth to meet the greater
cost of living.
R. Brindey Johnson.
THE
ATLANTIC MONTHLY:
at tfiaga;ine of literature^ ^>cience3 &rt3 anD
VOL. XCIIL — FEBR UARY, 1904. — No. DL VI.
WALL STREET AND THE COUNTRY.
THE perturbations to which prices have
been subjected on the New York Stock
Exchange during the past year have
naturally caused revulsions of feeling
among those who have suffered from
them, and much questioning of the wis-
dom of some of the recent operations of
prominent American financiers. It is a
familiar aphorism that " Wall Street "
is very popular in periods of ascending
prices, and is very unpopular in periods of
declining prices. The public often seem
to forget that quotations in Wall Street
are only the mirror of their own estimate
of the value of securities, and that most
financiers would be as well pleased as
outsiders if they could warp this mirror
to give the reflection of a constantly as-
cending value to the properties which
they control. There are many lessons
to be learned from recent experiences,
one of the most obvious being that the
outsider should not enter the stock mar-
ket in the gambling spirit, but only for
investment, and then only when he has
made a careful study of values of proper-
ties and their earning power, and of the
conditions which affect the market.
The creation of industrial companies
during the past five years and the as-
cending prices of their securities until
within the past year have written a new
chapter in the history of the world's ef-
fort to work out its economic destiny.
It has afforded a new illustration of the
law of the survival of the fittest. Prac-
tically every form of financial enterprise
has had to go through the same birth-
pangs when it was a new and untried
project ; and only those features of it
have survived which have been found to
possess real economic value. It is usually
those who initiate the new methods who
take the greater risks. If their projects
will not stand the test of competition,
they carry down their projectors with
them to disaster ; if they succeed, they
sometimes confer rich rewards upon the
far-sighted and venturesome pioneer ; but
in the latter case they render a net eco-
nomic service to the community. It is
the experience through which the new
methods of finance have passed, and that
through which they are yet to pass,
which is to determine whether they
have in them elements of survival.
The mechanism of modern finance
has been devised piece by piece to meet
the constantly growing demand for more
efficient methods of giving mobility to
capital. By mobility is meant facility
for transferring capital promptly and
without loss from one person to another.
It was the use of money which primarily
made possible the transfer of capital
when trade began to emerge from the
condition of barter. It has been the func-
tion of modern commerce and finance,
as capital grew in volume, to devise
new means of transferring it from place
to place and from industry to indus-
try. Hence has arisen the complicated
but symmetrical structure of deposit
banking, note issue, the joint stock
company, the negotiable security, the
produce and stock exchanges, the bank-
146
Wall Street and the Country.
ers' clearing house, the stock exchange
clearing house, the cable transfer for
credit, and the arbitrage of stock and ex-
change transactions, by which the change
of a fraction of one per cent in the rate
indicating the demand for credit in one
market would put at its command the
resources of the other markets of the
world.
This great fabric has been rendered
necessary by the growth of the fund of
capital seeking investment. This growth
in the volume of capital has been the
phenomenon of our generation. It has
been a growth of astonishing rapidity,
because the increase in the investment
fund has been much more rapid than
the increase in the total capital of the
community. This has resulted from a
simple process of mathematical incre-
ment. If an agricultural producer in
1850 had an annual producing power
which might be expressed by $350, of
which $300 was necessary to supply his
actual physical necessities, he would have
a surplus of $50, to be made a part of
the investment fund of the community.
If ten years later, in 1860, he had in-
creased his producing power by one sev-
enth, his total annual product would be
$400 ; but the effect would be felt upon
the investment fund of the community,
not merely by the increase of one sev-
enth, or about 15 per cent, in his total
product, but by an increase of 100 per
cent in the net product. Assuming that
his actual needs were still supplied by
$300, he would have $100 for investment
where he formerly had $50. If by 1880
his annual producing power further in-
creased by one fourth part of its effi-
ciency in 1860 to a total of $500, the
surplus funds seeking investment in the
market would have risen by another 100
per cent within twenty years, or by 400
per cent within thirty years.
These conclusions, based upon hypoth-
esis, are sustained by the evidence. The
increase in the capital employed in man-
ufactures over and above the normal in-
crease in proportion to population is one
of the gauges of the increased fund of
saving in the community. This increase
was from $2,118,208,769 in 1870 to
$9,835,086,909 in 1900. This increase
of more than $7,700,000,000 in manu-
facturing capital since 1870 is paralleled
by the increased application of capital in
another direction, — the construction and
equipment of railways. The total liabili-
ties of American railways, chiefly upon
their capital stock and funded debt, in-
creased from $3,784,543,034 in 1873 to
$12,326,491,526 in 1901.1 The pro-
portional increase called for by the
growth of population was only to about
$7,000,000,000, leaving a residue of
about $5,300,000,000 as the result of the
increased producing power of the people
of the United States under modern con-
ditions. The two items of manufacturing
capital and railway investment thus ac-
count for an investment fund of $16,000,-
000,000, which has been accumulating
during the past generation, and these are
only illustrations of the great fund of
saved capital seeking investment which
has been accumulating in recent years in
every field of productive industry.
Capital available for investment is
subject to the law of supply and demand.
In this respect, it does not differ from
commodities of a more specific charac-
ter. Other things being equal, two impor-
tant elements operate upon the price paid
for an investment, — its safety and the
net return paid in interest or dividends.
A high degree of safety will contribute
toward raising the price of an invest-
ment, but this rise in price will render
it less attractive upon the other side by
reducing the return upon it. For the
owner of an investment security, and es-
pecially for him who has it to sell, a
scarcity of safe securities and a rise in
their price are acceptable and desirable.
For the owner of capital seeking invest-
ment, however, an excess of such capital
in the market and a high price for securi-
1 U. S. Statistical Abstract, 1902, p. 407.
Wall /Street and the Country.
147
ties are an injury, because they reduce
the earning power of his capital, in what-
ever particular securities he may invest
it. To meet his needs, new demands for
capital must be found from time to time,
equal to the amount of capital created.
To find such openings for investment
is the business of the financier and pro-
moter. He found them early in the
nineteenth century without difficulty, be-
cause new demands for capital were
springing up faster than they could be
met. When society is in a stationary
state, — that is, when there are no im-
portant new inventions or changes in
social conditions, — saved capital ac-
cumulates faster than opportunities for
secure and profitable investments present
themselves. The tendency of such a
condition is to correct itself by creating
new wants, and hence invoking a demand
for the capital to provide the mechanism
to supply them ; but this tendency has
not prevented on several occasions the
serious congestion of savings beyond
effective demand and a consequent fall in
the rate of interest.
In modern times, even more than in
those more remote, there has been a
frequent tendency to the accumulation
of saved capital temporarily beyond the
legitimate demand for it for the creation
of new enterprises. The eminent French
economist, Paul Leroy-Beaulieu, in dis-
cussing this subject in L'Economiste
Francais of January 28, 1899, calls at-
tention to the fact that there were inter-
ruptions in the downward course of in-
terest when steam came to be generally
employed as a motive power between
1850 and 1865, and again after the great
destruction of capital in the Franco-
Prussian war. But, he declares, " after
each of these interruptions, the rate of
interest again tended to decline to a level
lower than before ; so that, in taking as
the point of departure the beginning of
the last quarter century, or that of the last
half century, or that of the last century,
— the year 1874 or the year 1850, —
it may be noted that the rate of interest
has considerably fallen, not in a straight
line, it is true, but in a broken line, and
that never in our history was it as low
as in 1897."
One of the best proofs of this super-
abundance of capital in the market about
1897 was the great number of cases in
which governments and stock companies
successfully sought to convert old obliga-
tions on which they were paying a high
rate of interest into new ones paying a
low rate of interest. Great Britain re-
funded her consolidated debt in 1888 at
two and three quarters per cent, and in
1897 and 1898 the quotations of these
new issues reached 112, and even a max-
imum of 113 J. The great Prussian con-
version was operated during 1897, and
applied to $850,000,000 of consolidated
four per cent securities. These four per
cents were quoted at 104.5, and the
three and a half per cents were quoted
at 104.2 in October, 1896. The three
per cent obligations issued in 1890 and
then quoted at 86.5 reached par on
July 5, 1895, and stood at 99.6 on Octo-
ber 5, 1896. Herr Miquel, the Prussian
Minister, in announcing his project, re-
called the fact that in 1894 France had
converted her four and a half per cents
into three and a half per cents ; that
Sweden, Norway, Luxembourg, Zurich,
Saxe-Gotha, Wurtemberg, and Bavaria
had converted four per cent into three
and a half per cent securities ; and that
Denmark, Belgium, Holland, Bremen,
and Berne had converted three and a
half per cents into three per cents, not
to speak of the great Russian conversion
of five per cents into four per cents.
In the United States, in spite of the
fact that a new country usually makes
large demands for capital, the supply
tended to exceed the legitimate and ef-
fective demand down to 1897. The fact
that this increase in the supply had great-
ly reduced its capacity to earn interest is
plainly indicated by the facts set forth in
the spring of 1903 by Professor Meade :
148
Wall Street and the Country.
" For the last thirty years the invest-
ment rate of interest has been steadily
sinking. In the early Seventies seven
per cent railway bonds were common.
In the next decade these were largely
replaced by five per cent bonds, and in
recent years three and a half per cent
bonds have been generally issued by
railway companies. At the same time
that the interest rate was falling, the
price of a $1000 bond increased. In
the Seventies railway companies often
paid ten per cent for money. At the
present time three and a half per cent
is the ordinary rate."
It is clear that this great accumulation
of capital would be employed with great
difficulty but for the organization of a
system of transferring it readily from
hand to hand and place to place. If
every one who saved was compelled to
employ his savings under his own per-
sonal care and direction in order to make
them fruitful, many difficulties would
arise and serious blunders would be
made. Large savings would seem in the
natural course of events, therefore, to
have suggested the organization of means
of employing them without imposing the
burden upon each individual who had
made savings. This has been the case
in advanced commercial society, but has
not been the case in undeveloped society.
The economic efficiency of Europe
and America is due in a large degree to
the fact that saved capital does not re-
pose in idle hoards, but is transferred as
fast as it is saved into hands which are
able to put it to productive use. In all
civilized countries the mechanism of
credit has now attained a considerable
degree of efficiency, but this efficiency
varies to a marked extent from country
to country.
Among the methods of putting capi-
tal into negotiable form these may be
enumerated : attracting deposits to bank-
ing institutions ; the organization of
stock companies for banking and other
large enterprises ; the organization of
railroad companies ; the capitalization
of industrial enterprises as stock com-
panies ; the diversification of banking
methods and of the forms of security
investment.
It is not necessary here to dwell upon
the expansion of banking in its simpler
forms. This has been more obvious to
the ordinary observer as a means of ac-
cumulating and transferring capital than
some of the other features of the modern
organization of credit. Next in order
to banking deposits as a part of the new
mechanism of finance comes the joint
stock company. A joint stock company
affords the means for dividing the own-
ership of properties in such a way that,
on the one hand, an individual of small
means may become part owner in a great
enterprise, and, on the other hand, enter-
prises may be successfully carried out,
of a magnitude which could not well be
undertaken by a single individual. The
creation of share companies divides the
risk of an undertaking among many per-
sons, and places the enterprise beyond
the accidents of a single human existence
by giving it a fictitious body dowered by
law with perpetual life. When these
properties are listed on the stock ex-
change they are afforded a general mar-
ket, in which it is easy to obtain a de-
finite test of their value. A mill or a
factory which is in private hands is sala-
ble or not according to individual and
local circumstances. When not con-
verted into the form of shares, a small
property of this character has a market
which is narrow and uncertain. The
property may pay a fair dividend upon
the capital invested or upon the cost of
replacement, but unless it happens to at-
tract the attention of a capitalist who is
also an expert in the same line of indus-
try, it cannot be sold at the will of the
owner. When, however, it is a part of
a property which comprises many other-
mills, and this property is represented by
bonds, preferred stock and common stock,
distributed among a multitude of own-
Wall Street and the Country.
149
ers and listed on the stock exchange, then
it is in the power of the individual owner
to part with his property at will at the
quotations of the market.
One of the natural consequences of
the abundance of capital seeking invest-
ments is the tendency to produce new
forms of securities. The evidence of
this is afforded by the great variety of
securities which are now at the command
of the investor in Great Britain and
America. The first form of investment
offered in the stock markets was govern-
ment obligations. These represented
capital taken from the community and
often applied in a manner which was not
economic, for the purposes of war or
preparations for war. Then came the
primitive form of the stock company,
which was simply the issue of shares es-
tablishing a common and divisible right
in a large property. It has remained
for recent years to develop the preferred
share, the mortgage bond, income bonds,
convertible bonds, debentures, and many
other forms of obligation. These vari-
ous types of securities offer a variety of
investment which permits each investor
to choose among them according to his
individual valuation of the relative ad-
vantages of risk with large returns, se-
curity with small returns, prompt returns
or ultimate profit. The mortgage bond
of a first-class railway, varying little
under ordinary conditions in its market
quotations because it pays a fixed income,
is the most secure investment after the
government bond, and the most appro-
priate for the investment of trust funds.
The preferred stock of a well-established
investment enterprise offers a fixed re-
turn with perhaps a higher degree of risk,
and is, therefore, likely to pay a larger re-
turn in relation to the price than the bond.
The convertible bond offers a high de-
gree of security, with the additional
allurement of admitting the bondholder
to a share in the expanding profits of the
preferred shareholder when the price of
stock rises above the price of the bonds.
Every form of investment which
proves more attractive to a certain class
of investors than previous forms adds to
the means for drawing capital out of
hoards and private hands and putting it
at the command of the community. If
bonds and ordinary shares prove unat-
tractive to a certain type of investor,
then the market where only those forms
of investment are available does not af-
ford the highest facilities for drawing
hoarded capital from idleness into utili-
ties. This was the case until recently
in France, where the issue of preferred
shares was not permitted by law, but only
common shares and bonds. The device
so frequent in the organization of Amer-
ican industrial corporations, by which
the assured earning power is capitalized
as preferred stock and the contingent
profits of bankers and promoters are con-
verted into common stock, to be sold for
what it will bring or laid away until it
earns dividends, was not available for the
French financier. Hence the inducement
was lacking to unify and strengthen
French industry by consolidating old
companies and putting the best equip-
ment and most far-sighted management
at the command of new companies.
The countries of Europe, especially
those of the Continent, have much to
learn from America in diversifying the
forms of investment so as to put saved
capital to its most productive use ; but
America has also something to learn
from Europe. We have done much
more than France and Germany to draw
the small capitals of the masses into our
commercial banks ; but they have devel-
oped forms of investment which we have
not tried, or which we have not managed
with prudence.
A striking instance of the diversifica-
tion of banking methods which has thus
far failed to obtain a firm footing in
America is the mortgage loan bank. The
purpose of such an institution is to give
to the ownership of real estate something
of the transferability and divisibility of
150
Wall Street and the Country.
other property. This is accomplished
by converting the aggregate of many
small mortgages upon real estate into
negotiable bonds. In Europe great
banks of this character exist in France,
Germany, Austria-Hungary, Spain, and
several other countries, and recently the
system has been extended to Egypt.
By the sale of a block of debenture bonds,
secured by mortgages upon the land upon
which loans have been made, the in-
vestor has a security which is negotiable
at any time on the market, instead o£
dealing with a single mortgage which he
might find difficulty in selling, in case of
need, for what he paid for it. There is
no doubt of the perfect practicability
and safety of the system, when loans are
made to only a legitimate percentage of
the ascertained value of the property
and other proper precautions are taken.
The Credit Foncier of France, which is
engaged in such business, has mortgage
bonds out to the amount of about $350,-
000,000. In Germany thirty-three such
banks have similar obligations to the
amount of more than $1,500,000,000,
scattered in every part of the empire ;
while the Land Mortgage .Bank of Aus-
tria-Hungary has debentures of nearly
$40,000,000, and the Mortgage Bank of
Spain has similar obligations of $17,000,-
000. These institutions practically bring
into the security market a large part of
the land values of Europe. A mortgage
bank of this sort is able to increase its
loans to the limit of the debentures which
it can sell, and every few months wit-
nesses an offer of a block of such securi-
ties, which are eagerly subscribed for by
those seeking a safe and steady invest-
ment.
The genius of American financiers and
promoters has blazed out investment
paths of its own. The path followed
during the last few years has been the
conversion into large corporations of in-
dustrial enterprises. The Wall Street
Journal recently estimated the new se-
curities thrown upon the market as a
result of this process at nine billions of
dollars, and declared : —
" The next stage was the sale of these
securities to people who had up to that
time neither been owners of plants and
manufacturers, nor investors, but who,
tempted by the novel opportunity, in-
vested their money in the new industrial
securities. The fact that the United
States Steel Corporation now has some-
thing like 55,000 stockholders is the best
demonstration of this that any one could
wish. Consequently, the industrial pro-
motions had the effect of tapping to quite
a large extent a fund which had hereto-
fore not been available to the security
market, having found investment largely
in savings banks, real estate," etc.
When capital began to accumulate
rapidly, therefore, after the recovery
from the long prostration of 1893-97,
and only a limited outlet was found for
it at first in the creation of new manu-
facturing plants and the extension of
railways, the financier turned naturally
to the project of organizing manufactur-
ing industries upon the basis of stock com-
panies. Other reasons, like the sever-
ity of competition, undoubtedly produced
the tendency to consolidate industries by
bringing to an end useless duplications
of expenditures and getting rid of com-
petition. These causes, however, could
not have produced the phenomena of re-
cent years if there had not been a great
fund of capital in the money market seek-
ing new investments. There would not
have been the capital available in the
hands of one manufacturer to buy out
another, or in the hands of promoters to
buy them both out, which has been found
available under the conditions of recent
years.
When, however, the earning power
of a number of mills or factories could
be capitalized into bonds and preferred
stock, a supply of securities could be thus
created which would meet the demand
for new forms of investment arising from
among those who were rapidly making
Wall Street and the Country.
151
money under favorable commercial con-
ditions. In many cases it was found
that the owners of the old establishments
were willing to retire from business and
to accept a fixed income upon their capi-
tal. To others the original investment
could be reimbursed from the savings of
outsiders who became shareholders in the
consolidated industries. The transfer of
such considerable sums to the owners of
the old plants, where they were paid in
cash, added to the fund seeking invest-
ment, and thereby added to the capacity
of the market for absorbing securities.
That this tendency to create securities
has been overdone within the past few
years is undoubtedly true. The inevit-
able operation of the law of supply and
demand curtailed demand when the sup-
ply of capital available for such invest-
ments was absorbed. The process of
creating new securities proved so profit-
able — or at least appeared so — that
the demand was soon more than satisfied.
Hence came the phenomenon of a mass
of " undigested securities " which could
no longer find the ready market of a few
years before. The fault has not lain al-
together with the character of the securi-
ties. The fall in quotations for indus-
trials on the New York stock market is
not due altogether to impairment of con-
fidence in the value of such enterprises,
but it is the inevitable result of an ex-
cessive offer in relation to effective de-
mand. That effective demand depends
upon the supply of capital. The evidence
of deficiency of capital in Great Britain
is afforded by the heaviness of British
consols, which carried them down from
112 in 1897 to 94 in 1899, and finally be-
low 88 in 1903. It was not that confi-
dence had been impaired in the willing-
ness and ability of the British government
to pay interest in full on these securities
as it became due, but the fact that new
issues of such obligations increased the
supply on the market beyond the demand
for a safe security at the higher prices.
To a like cause — absorption of the
surplus capital in the market — may be
attributed the fall in first-class railroad
stocks and the hesitation of the market
to absorb new stocks and bonds of the
most gilt-edged character.
Undoubtedly, also, in the case of in-
dustrial securities issued on the Ameri-
can market, the character of those issued
has tended in many cases to become
worse as the issues have increased. This
would not necessarily be the fact in each
separate case, but would result from the
natural tendency to consolidate indus-
tries and issue securities first where there
was the best economic justification for it.
The first consolidations were the result
of the pressure of economic necessity in
order to escape forms of competition
which had become unprofitable. They
promised real economies in management
and increased earnings, in order to com-
mend themselves to the promoters and
investors who took them up. When con-
solidation, however, had become simply
an imitative mania, and the investor,
tempted by the large profits, or appar-
ent large profits, of the first combina-
tions, became eager to buy their securi-
ties, it was inevitable that the quality of
new enterprises of this character should
progressively deteriorate. When the de-
mand for new securities was small, it
was necessary that they should be of the
highest character to find a market ; when
the demand became apparently insati-
able, it was natural that shrewd and some-
times unscrupulous promoters should set
themselves to provide a supply. It might
be said in a broad sense that the early con-
solidations were forced upon promoters
and financiers by industrial conditions,
— while some of the later ones were the
result of the efforts of such promoters
to create conditions which would afford
them opportunities for " a rake-off." In
an economic sense, the later process was
putting the cart before the horse. When
mushroom trust companies were created
for the purpose of imitating the large pro-
fits of the older and more conservative
152
Wall /Street and the Country.
companies, it was natural that they should
greedily swallow any bait which pro-
mised large profits, without going behind
the prospectus to inquire too closely into
the solidity of the new projects, or even
into the honesty of those who brought
them forward.
But the public is to blame in such
cases quite as much as misguided or dis-
honest promoters. If they pass by con-
servative companies and safe investments
to seize upon glittering offers of specula-
tive stocks.by mushroom institutions, who
is to stay them or retrieve their errors,
so long as those who delude them keep
barely within the line of indictable fraud ?
It is the same old story which has been
told many times in periods of expanding
trade. The public fail to discriminate
between those securities which are proper
for trust investments and those whose low
prices are determined by the very fact
that they are speculative. Each succes-
sive generation in a period of prosperity
and ascending prices seems to forget the
fundamental rule of finance, — that the
return paid upon a security is inversely
to its safety. To those financiers who in-
culcate this rule they turn a deaf ear, and
the latter are perforce compelled to drift
with the current or see themselves strand-
ed without clients or profits.
Every new form of financial organiza-
tion has to pass through the test of fire.
Experience is required, to develop its ele-
ments of strength and weakness. When
the principle of the stock company with
limited liability was first recognized in
modern industry, Adam Smith declared
that its use was limited to a few special
enterprises like banking, which followed
a settled routine. Every one has gotten
away from that prejudice, but the ulti-
mate capacity of the joint stock system
of organization is still untested. During
the past century it has been extended to
nearly every form of manufacture and to
the complicated problems of transporta-
tion by land and sea. It contains, how-
ever, other possibilities which have not
yet been developed. Among those which
have recently been put into practice have
been the consolidation of great industries,
the leasing of one corporation's property
to another, and the control of operating
companies by companies holding their
securities. Whether these new forms of
joint stock enterprise will be successful
must be determined by the same test
which has been applied to all other en-
terprises, — the test of experience.
It is not surprising that the first experi-
ments have afforded results which in
some cases are subject to criticism. This
was the case with some of the first joint
stock companies in their simplest form,
and was so conspicuously the case with
banking in our earlier history that the
innocent use of credit in the form of
printed bank-notes has not yet shaken off
the prejudice resulting from these experi-
ments. Even the corporate organization
of railways, with their issues of bonds
and stock to create pathways through the
wilderness, resulted in great losses in
1873, and nearly two hundred receiver-
ships as recently as 1893. The London
Statist has within a few weeks recalled
to British investors that " in their early
days many of the [American] railroads
were over-capitalized much as indus-
trial companies now are, but owing to
their enormous betterment outlays for
many years past, the water in Ameri-
can railway capital has now been in most
cases effectively squeezed out, and the
properties brought up to their book val-
ues."
But the joint stock principle, the rail-
ways and the banks have survived the
trials resulting from early errors, and are
now admitted by every one to be essen-
tial and beneficent parts of our finan-
cial machinery. Railway bonds and
many railway stocks have reached a
solid investment basis, superior to the
storms of business disturbance which are
sweeping over the newer enterprises.
The older and larger banks and trust
companies have also avoided the blun-
Wall Street and the Country.
153
ders of early days, and have kept their
assets in a form in which they could be
quickly converted into cash in case of
need. The fact that deposits payable on
demand should be covered by assets
convertible on demand has been well
learned by American bankers. Only the
amateurs and the incompetents among
bankers and trust company managers
have forgotten the famous distinction of
Mr. Hankey between a mortgage and a
bill of exchange. The more conservative
of the New York trust companies in par-
ticular, making their advances exclu-
sively on the best stock exchange securi-
ties, with a margin of twenty per cent
between the market value and the amount
loaned, have not failed since the first
signs of a coming storm to husband their
resources, to scan critically even high-
priced collateral, and to give the benefit
of the doubt always on the side of con-
servatism.
It remains to apply to the industrial
trust and the new forms of financial
organization the lessons so well learned
in the school of experience in railroading
and banking. To obtain a given result
by the greatest possible economy of cap-
ital and of effort is the secret of success
in finance, in industry, and in competi-
tion in foreign markets. The Bank of
England does the great business of the
British banking system with a metallic
reserve many times less than that of the
New York banks and the Treasm-y of
the United States. In the early days
of England's financial primacy, the re-
serve proved insufficient, and English
finance was all but wrecked. So it may
be that our industrial combinations must
learn the lesson of larger reserves and
sufficient working capital before they are
planted on a solid basis ; but in the end,
even if they cannot realize the ambitious
dream of putting an end to perturbations
in industry, they are likely to vindicate
their claim to increasing the productive
efficiency and competitive power of our
country.
It may well prove, also, that the prin-
ciple of the operating company, and the
security-holding company, in spite of the
fact that they give a minority of strong
holders the power to dictate the policy
of the corporation under control, may
serve the public interest by bringing
unity and concentration into manage-
ment which has been incoherent and in-
competent. The system of the security-
holding company permits far - sighted
men, for instance, who are willing to
postpone present dividends to future
wealth, to study the needs of a growing
community, and to promote its growth by
building traction lines in advance of the
public demand instead of waiting for
such a demand to become imperative.
It enables the managers of a great trunk
line to put an end to transfers of pas-
sengers at state boundaries and local
terminals, and to run the palatial trains
across the continent upon harmoniously
adjusted schedules which, far from being
" in restraint of trade," have done more
to promote it than all the laws for pre-
venting combination or all the suits begun
in pursuance thereof. The system of
the holding company undoubtedly in-
creases the power of the big financiers,
but it enables them in many cases to go
forward with far-sighted plans for meet-
ing the certain expansion of local traffic
in our imperial city, or of international
traffic between the grainfields of Min-
nesota and the markets of Asia, which
would be difficult or impossible under
the old system of petty competing or-
ganizations governed by the restricted
vision of some neighborhood magnate.
The voting trust is another system of
organization designed to the same end,
— to put properties into the hands of
competent and responsible persons, and
to remove them from the danger of
manipulative control through the stock
market. One of the greatest evils of our
system of an unfettered stock market is
the opportunity which it affords to rich
buccaneers to upset values and threaten
154
Wall Street and the Country.
the tranquil ownership of property.
Against this danger the voting trust
forms a safeguard. In thus making it
easy to locate upon a few heads the re-
sponsibility for the conduct of great en-
terprises, the management of our finan-
cial projects follows the tendency to-
ward the fixing of responsibility which
has become the model under our best city
charters, where the scattered authority
of commissions and legislative bodies has
been concentrated to a large degree in
the hands of a single executive.
The concentration of banking re-
sources and the power which is derived
from cooperation among the banks and
a few resolute leaders in times of crisis
are generally recognized to be one of
the most potent factors in our recent
industrial progress and our present
financial security. If the recent decline
in the price of securities had found the
market depending upon a large number
of banking institutions with small cap-
ital, indifferently managed, and divid-
ed by petty jealousies, it might have
tumbled them over like a row of bricks,
and made the declining market of 1903
a repetition of the panic experiences of
1873 and 1893. Combination has vin-
dicated itself the world over in banking ;
it remains to be seen whether, after due
experimentation, it will not also vindi-
cate itself in railway management and
manufacturing.
America has a great destiny to per-
form in the industrial development of
the world. She can perform it only by
applying to every part of the machin-
ery of production, transportation, and
exchange the principle of the greatest
economy of effort to obtain the greatest
sum of results. The opportunity for
every man to rise by his talents from
the lowest to the highest place, the right
to reap and hold the rewards of one's
labor without excessive taxation or vex-
atious visitation, the privilege of trans-
ferring property on the stock exchanges
without the fetters imposed on such
transactions in Europe, and the freedom
to extend new methods of economy and
combination in trade and finance across
the continent, untrammeled by local tar-
iffs and state boundaries, are among the
weapons which give our country its great
advantages in dealing with older compet-
itors. It is not surprising that, in the
strenuous work of forging these weapons
to their sharpest temper, mistakes have
been made, capital has been lost, the sub-
tile resentment has been aroused of those
incompetent to meet the new conditions ;
but such errors are the almost inevitable
incidents of a period of progress. They
correct themselves in the furnace of com-
petition better than they are likely to be
corrected by paternal legislation, which
is usually bungling and often ineffective.
A community which does not within
proper limits encourage the enterprise of
the promoter puts fetters upon the trans-
fer of its capital to its most efficient
uses and upon the development of the
highest industrial efficiency. Upon the
proper direction of capital rests the in-
dustrial development of a nation. Every-
thing which tends to hamper the trans-
fer of capital from an industry which
has ceased to be profitable, because per-
haps it has been too widely extended,
tends to prevent the direction of the
capital of the country into the channels
where it is most efficient. The work of
the promoter in recent years has tended
to increase this transf erability of capital
by providing a method for getting rid of
useless plants without direct loss to their
owners, and adjusting the productive
capacity of an industry to the actual
demand for its products. More than
this, in the organization of a new enter-
prise, like the opening of a new mine,
the promoter actually adds to the effi-
cient wealth of the community by open-
ing sources of income which were before
untouched. As Professor Meade well
says in his book on Trust Finance : —
" In the present scheme of production
the resources and the money are useless
Lynching : A Southern View.
155
apart. Let them be brought together,
and wealth is the result. The unassisted
coincidence of investment funds with
investment opportunities, however, is
fortuitous and uncertain. The investor
and the land or patent or mine owner
have few things in common. Left to
themselves they might never meet. But
the promoter brings these antithetical
elements together, and in this way is the
means of creating a value which did not
before exist, and which is none the less
a social gain because much of it is ab-
sorbed by the promoter and the finan-
cier."
The new methods and the new pro-
jects are going through the test of fire
to-day, and some of them are being con-
sumed. The tests which weeded out
the badly organized and incompetent of
the early stock companies, which drove
to the wall the " wildcat " banks of ante-
bellum days, and which wiped out divi-
dends and stock rights in badly managed
railways, are now being applied to the
new forms of organization which have
been the growth of the past decade. But
the stronger and better organized of
these new corporations are likely to meet
these trials without disaster, or to modify
their methods to conform to the teach-
ings of experience, until there remains
to the financial world a valuable residu-
um of new methods for giving flexibility
to capital and promoting its transfer
promptly and efficiently from the in-
dustries where it is not needed to those
where it will render its highest service.
Charles A. Conant.
LYNCHING: A SOUTHERN VIEW.
[The author of this article is a native of North Carolina, and has been for several years editor
of the Raleigh Progressive Farmer. — THE EDITORS.]
THAT lynching is an evil is denied by
no one. Even Mr. John Temple Graves,
who defended it in his recent Chautau-
qua address, had to admit that it is de-
moralizing and criminal, and that its
logical consummation is anarchy. The
savage, we know, punishes by the mob
or by personal vengeance, while " it is the
first law of the social order that no man
shall be the judge in his own cause,"
that the government alone shall have the
right to fix penalties and punish crimi-
nals, and that each citizen shall uphold
the majesty of the law and swear alle-
giance to the courts of justice. This is
the basis of all order ; on this depends
the safety of life and property. And
such unity obtains in our governmental
fabric that we cannot disturb this funda-
mental principle in any manner without
endangering the entire structure. If one
pillar totters, all the pillars will totter.
To protect anarchy at one point is to
spread anarchy to all points. We can-
not encourage a hundred men to disre-
gard law without encouraging the indi-
vidual to disregard law ; we cannot
encourage law-breaking to gratify ven-
geance without encouraging law-breaking
to gratify hate or greed or lust. The
mob spirit breeds disrespect for all law.
For yet other reasons is lynching to
be dreaded and deplored. It threatens
justice and engenders unrest. Our judges,
as a class, are men of high character and
ability, and our juries are composed of
fair-minded and intelligent men. But
the mob may be recruited from the worst
element of the community, men of bad
character and low intelligence ; its mem-
bers may even have private grudges
against the alleged criminal. The court,
too, acts in the open, seen and scrutinized
by all ; the judge and the jurymen are
156
Lynching : A Southern View.
known, and they know that their repu-
tations will be injured if they act care-
lessly or unrighteously. But the mob has
no such incentive to right action. It
hides itself in the dark ; it shrinks from
the gaze of men ; its members are not
known to their fellow citizens ; the fear
of incurring individual condemnation
does not restrain them from injustice.
Moreover, thfe court considers evidence
calmly and carefully. " If this man is
guilty, let him be punished ; if he is not
guilty, let the real criminal be sought
out and dealt with." But the mob works
in the heat of passion and in great haste.
Too often it hangs the man on incom-
plete circumstantial evidence, hangs the
wrong man. But that ends the matter ;
there is no further investigation, and the
guilty man goes free, — perhaps to repeat
his crime. These are a few of the many
dangers of mob law.
Hurtful and vicious as is the lynching
evil, we have in the South another evil
that is not less dark and diabolical. For
every negro who is disturbed by fear of
the mob, a hundred white women are
haunted by the nameless dread. These
are the twin perils that menace South-
ern peace, — twin perils, I say, for there
is a vital connection between them. To
say that men are lynched for other crimes
than that against white women, and that
therefore lynching cannot be attributed
to it, is to be more plausible than accu-
rate. It is with this crime that lynch-
ing begins ; here and here only could
the furious mob spirit break through the
resisting wall of law and order. Once
through, it does not stop. But it is only
because lynching for rape is excused
that lynching for any other crime is ever
attempted. If there were no lustful brutes
to deal with, it would be easy to develop
a public sentiment that would make any
form of lynching impossible.
There are, therefore, two ways of at-
tacking the mob spirit. We may (1) as-
sail lynching directly, or we may (2)
seek to destroy the crime which nour-
ishes and sustains it. Both direct and
indirect methods, as I shall try to show
in this paper, ought to be employed.
Heretofore we have attacked mob law
only in the most direct of direct ways.
We have passed laws breathing out
threatenings and slaughter against lynch-
ers, only to find that it is useless to have
an anti-lynching law on our statute books
until the people have an anti-lynching
law in their hearts and consciences. In
the eyes of the court eveiy man who kills
without warrant of law — whether or
not the victim be accused of crime — is a
murderer. In North Carolina this prin-
ciple was supplemented more than a de-
cade ago by a special statute making it a
felony to break into a jail for the pur-
pose of lynching a prisoner. Judges
have charged juries against the crime,
and Governor Aycock — risking his po-
litical fortunes for his convictions — re-
cently offered a reward of $400 each for
the conviction of a party of seventy-five
who lynched a negro near Salisbury.
But never yet has the law punished a
North Carolina lyncher.
We may as well admit, therefore, that
this plan of action, unless supplemented
by other measures, is a failure.' When
the flock is threatened, it is wiser to
unloose the dogs than try to bind the
wolves. When law is threatened, it is
better to unfetter the courts than to try
to fetter the mob. And the courts are
fettered.
That the law at present is lacking in
efficiency is not an idle assertion, a mere
excuse of the bloodthirsty. It is not an
unsupported supposition of editors and
politicians, and of people not versed in
legal lore. It is the testimony of men
who know whereof they speak. One of
the finest and gentlest men I know, an
old-school Southern lawyer whose tender-
ness is such that he will not prosecute a
man for his life, said to me two years
ago that with our peremptory challenges,
Lynching : A Southern View.
157
habeas corpus proceedings, writs of error,
changes of venue, exceptions, appeals,
new trials, respites, pardons, etc., our law-
makers have labored so assiduously to
protect the accused prisoner that they
have become unjust to the accusing pub-
lic. " Our civilization has gone too far
in these matters," says the Georgia Bar
Association, " and has overdone itself."
" Enough lias been done for those who
murder," says one Chief Justice ; " it is
time the courts were doing something for
those who do not wish to be murdered."
And Justice Brewer of our United States
Supreme Court, who speaks from wide
experience and lifelong observation, said
to the law class of Yale College a few
months ago : —
"It has seemed to me at times that
legislation was conceived in the spirit of
obstruction to the punishment of crimi-
nals. To obstruct the administration of
justice, the writ of habeas corpus, writs
of error, and pleas for stays of proceed-
ings have been resorted to by many law-
yers, and, last of all, often and often
stand tender-hearted executives to inter-
pose clemency. It is not to be wondered
at that some communities have arisen in
their wrath and have inflicted the sum-
mary punishment that machinery of the
law has delayed, and which they feared
it might delay among them, too."
It may be claimed — and I know
lawyers who do claim — that such ex-
pressions as these have themselves en-
couraged the mob spirit. But the mob
gets ten times as much strength from the
fact as from the publication of the fact ;
the danger is, not that the weakness is
charged, but that it exists. Loyalty to
law demands that we condemn lack of
reverence for it, whatever its imperfec-
tions ; but loyalty demands no less sure-
ly that we remove these imperfections
that irreverence may be more readily
destroyed.
Taking first things first, let us con-
sider the matter of peremptory challenges
of venire men. In most states the dis-
parity between the number allowed the
defendant and the number allowed the
state is much too great. In this we have
a survival of that early period of judicial
history when the man accused of a capi-
tal offense was not allowed compulsory
process to summon witnesses in his be-
half, was without counsel to speak for
him, and was supposed to be discrim-
inated against by the officers of the law
who selected the prospective jurymen.
To protect the prisoner in the face of
these unfair conditions, he was given
much the larger number of challenges,
— an advantage which he still largely
retains, in spite of the fact that the de-
fense is now on an equal footing with
the prosecution. " The policy of those
states which discriminate against the
prosecution in this particular," says one
of our best-known American authorities
(Thompson and Merriarn on Juries),
" is not apparent. The government cer-
tainly has the same right to an impartial
jury as an accused person has, and, it
would seem, ought to be possessed of
equal facilities for procuring it."
The latest statistics which I have been
able to obtain, however, show that in
the trial of prisoners for capital crimes
only seven of the United States (New
York, Massachusetts, Colorado, Illinois,
Florida, Connecticut, and Rhode Island)
have these " equal facilities for procur-
ing an impartial jury." Three hundred
peremptory challenges for the prosecu-
tion to six hundred and fifty for the de-
fendant is about the aggregate for the
several states. Massachusetts is unique
in that it allows a greater number to the
government than to the prisoner, — twen-
ty-two to twenty. On the other hand,
twenty for the defendant and two for the
state is the rule in South Carolina, whose
population is said to have furnished the
largest number of murders last year, and
the smallest proportion of legal hang-
ings. In North Carolina the defendant
has twenty-three peremptory challenges,
the state four ; and Chief Justice Clark
158
Lynching : A Southern View.
in a recent opinion referred to this dis-
parity and the consequent weakening of
the law as one reason for the increase of
crime and lynching. " It is only neces-
sary," he says, " for the defendant to
' run ' for one man on the panel who is
friendly to him, for if he can secure that
man by the rejection of twenty-three oth-
ers, besides those stood aside for cause,
he has defeated the unanimous verdict
which is requisite for conviction."
A case in point has just been brought
to light in the writer's own city. In the
trial of a man of wealth, charged with
murder, it transpired that he had em-
ployed agents in each township to take a
census of the men subject to jury duty
and ascertain who were friendly to him
and who hostile, who inclined to be
friendly and who inclined to be hostile,
— thus enabling him to use his larger
number of challenges in a manner mani-
festly inimical to the interests of justice.
Clearly, therefore, to take away this
unfair advantage given the criminal is
one of the imperative tasks confronting
those who would stay the mob spirit. It
will make for surer punishment of crimi-
nals. But we must also have speedier
trials. " Crime and punishment grow
out of one stem," says Emerson ; but the
only way to teach the ignorant classes
the logical connection between the two is
to inflict the punishment while public in-
terest is still fixed on the crime. More-
over, speed is required because punish-
ment is sure only when it is speedy.
The indignation and abhorrence which
wrong-doing always excites effervesce too
quickly. Let an unruly child induce its
parents to postpone punishment for a
week or a month, and the offense will
be punished inadequately or not at all.
At first the voice of our brother's blood
may cry to us from the ground, but the
voice grows weaker and weaker as time
goes on. The legal principle, an eye for
an eye and a life for a life, can be en-
forced only when there is a vivid reali-
zation of the victim's loss. As this be-
comes dimmer, the punishment of the
criminal seems more and more like a
new and useless effusion of blood. Thus
"the law's delay," regarded even in
Hamlet's day as one of life's grievous
evils, is still a force for evil.
Of remedies, the most notable yet pro-
posed is that advocated by Justice David
J. Brewer. In cases of capital crime he
would have the nearest judge convene
court as early as possible for the trial of
the accused. He would abolish appeals
in all criminal cases, but would allow the
prisoner to submit at once to the Su-
preme Court a stenographic report of the
evidence, — a new trial to be granted
should the court reach the conclusion
that the wrong man had been convicted,
but never for mere violation of legal
technicalities. We may not wish to go
so far, but the fact that a member of our
highest court suggests such a remedy for
the weakness ,of the judiciary and the
spread of lawlessness is enough to con-
vince all of the need of genuine reform.
For example, it is stated on high author-
ity that " not a single public official
charged with wrong-doing in New York
within the last fifteen years has actually
received legal punishment. Many have
been indicted ; a number have been con-
victed and sentenced, but some higher
court has interfered in every case, always
on the ground of a flaw in the indictment
or some other purely technical defect, and
never on the relative merits of the ques-
tion at issue." One inexcusable fault was
pointed out by a Southern bar association
some time ago in a resolution which de-
clared that new trials should not be
granted on account of error " unless it
appear to the satisfaction of the appellate
court that such error probably and rea-
sonably affected the result adversely to
the appealing party." The mere state-
ment of such a condition is argument
enough for a change. Let us not blame
the criminal lawyer for using these op-
portunities for delay ; let us blame our-
selves for permitting them to exist.
Lynching : A Southern View.
159
The pardoning power ought also to be
hedged about with greater restrictions.
That it has been often abused there can
be no doubt. A false idea of mercy
has led many of our governors to do far-
reaching harm to society. Where mercy
can be given the criminal without in-
justice to the public, the pardoning power
should be exercised. But often, to par-
don means to lessen the criminal's fear
of law, to weaken the citizen's confidence
in it, and to strengthen the mob spirit
among all classes. In such cases it is
better to be merciful to a thousand law-
abiding citizens than to one man whom
the courts have pronounced guilty of
crime. It would probably be well to re-
strict pardons and commutations — at
least for those crimes of which the ex-
treme penalty is death — to those recom-
mended by the judge or solicitor of the
court which tried the prisoner.
These are some of the changes needed
in our general legal machinery. But we
shall have to recognize the fact that the
one crime which oftenest provokes lynch-
ing is a peculiar one and demands pe-
culiar treatment. Whatever we may do
in murder cases, in dealing with rape we
shall have to adopt Judge Brewer's plan
in its entirety.
Moreover, the Universal Peace Union
and a number of prominent periodicals
have recently suggested the unsexing of
criminals of this class. In the South, at
least, where the peril is most imminent,
nothing less than death will ever be re-
garded as sufficient punishment. Im-
prisonment, however, is our only penalty
for assault with intent, and for this crime
the surgeon's remedy would doubtless
prove more effective as a deterrent, while
as a protection to society against the
repetition of the offense it would be ab-
solute. The Wilmington, Delaware, ne-
gro who was lynched last spring had once
been in prison for attempted assault. Set
free with the same lustful mania, a wolf
in human form, he brought death to
himself and to a pure-hearted victim,
and shame to a great state. The law
should effectively protect the public
against the degenerate whose uncontrol-
lable passion has once led him to threat-
en our women ; if it will not, the mob
will. The proposed legal remedy may
be objected to as a reversion to barbaric
custom, but, as Qollier's Weekly ob-
serves, " no precedent for maiming as a
general practice could be established in
these days." And I repeat that we must
recognize the fact that we have a peculiar
crime, to be dealt with in a peculiar man-
ner.
We should also take notice of the fact
that lynching is often condoned because
of the humiliation the wronged woman
must endure in appearing against the
prisoner in open court. As for the time-
worn suggestion that the affidavit of the
woman be accepted as sufficient, this is
effectually barred by the Sixth Amend-
ment to our national Constitution, which
guarantees the right of the criminal to
be " confronted by the witnesses against
him." But the judge has power to keep
the defendant's counsel within the bounds
of decency and courtesy, even if the dan-
ger of outraging public sentiment were
not alone enough to insure this. In a
case of this kind a short time ago a
Southern judge excluded all women and
all boys under sixteen from the court
house. He then requested that all
"gentlemen" who were mere onlookers
leave the room, and the majority left.
Such methods as these might be more
generally adopted. Better still, the law
might empower judges in such cases to
clear the room of all idle spectators. I
believe it is generally admitted that this
would not infringe upon the constitu-
tional rights of the defendant.
" The establishment of greater confi-
dence in the summary and certain pun-
ishment of the criminal," — this is Judge
Brewer's remedy for lynching, and the
changes we have considered will do much
to bring it about. It will remove the
cause of most lynchings that are regarded
160
Lynching : A Southern View.
as excusable, and will uncloak the inex-
cusable ones. For there are inexcusable,
utterly inexcusable lynchings. The mob
is not always actuated by fear of a guilty
man's escape. Sometimes the ruling
passion is only a savage, diabolical blood-
thirstiness. Sometimes it is sheer and
fiendish bullyism tormenting the weak
and defenseless. Sometimes it is the
mob leader's desire for personal ven-
geance, — murderous hate doing its work
in the name of justice. But these crimi-
nals find refuge in the same defense
which shields those who are impelled by
an honest (however mistaken) desire to
protect the sanctity of their homes, — the
inefficiency of the law. We must de-
prive them of this protection and expose
them to the penalties they deserve. Re-
move the legal shortcomings that cause
law-loving men to condone lynching, and
the lawless can no longer practice it
with impunity. Excepting possibly for
the most heinous crimes and in commu-
nities where the white population is en-
tirely outnumbered by negroes of the
lowest type, lynching can then be made
odious and punishable (as it should be).
For our warfare on mob law will not
be complete without a stringent, but flex-
ible and enforcible anti-lynching law.
First of all, the law must recognize the
fact that the average lyncher, criminal
as he is, does not deserve the punishment
given for capital crime, and that to re-
fuse to recognize lynching as anything
but murder is equivalent to refusing to
recognize it as a crime at all ; for it can-
not be punished as murder. There
should be a wide range of penalties, be-
ginning with a fine and brief imprison-
ment for the man who joins a mob,
prompted only by a desire to punish
crime, and ending with death for the
possible enormity of using the mob to
kill a personal enemy. If only a three
months' term in jail stared every lyncher
in the face, only the sternest sense of
duty or the strongest of passions would
cause men to take the law into their own
hands. And not only should lynchers be
punished, but all officers who tamely sur-
render prisoners to the fury of the mob
ought to be severely dealt with.
Finally, good men everywhere must
preach in season and out of season the
sanctity of law and the peril of lawless-
ness. We must excuse lynching under
no conditions, for as certainly as a fire,
fanned to a fury in one room, will sweep
on to other rooms, so certainly will the
mob, if generally encouraged to punish
one crime, sweep irresistibly on to sup-
plant the court at all points. Instead
of excusing it where the crime is horrible
and the guilt of the criminal undoubted,
we must teach that in such cases mob
law is the more indefensible — because
of the increased certainty and speed of
legal punishment.
It is not the criminal's rights, but the
court's rights, that we need to emphasize.
In his heart of hearts every man must
say with the lynchers that the rapist is a
brute who has forfeited all human rights.
But the law that we have set up in God's
name, and in the name of all the people,
— this has the highest and noblest of
rights, and it is the law's right to try the
criminal, not the criminal's right to a
lawful trial, that is violated whenever
and wherever an irresponsible minority
usurps the powers which the whole peo-
ple have vested in our courts of justice.
We need to teach that, if Satan himself
should commit a crime, we should try
him in legal form, — not for Satan's sake,
but for the sake of law and order and
civilization ; not that he would have the
right to a court trial, but that our courts
alone would have the right to try him ;
and that trial by any other body is, and
will ever be, usurpation and minority rule,
— un-American, undemocratic, and un-
endurable.
n.
So much for the direct ways of at-
tacking the mob spirit. With these im-
provements in our judicial system, I be-
lieve that lynching for any other crime
Lynching : A Southern View.
161
than that against white women can be
stopped within a reasonable period of
time, and that lynching for this offense
can be materially and steadily dimin-
ished. For this crime, however, the less
intelligent classes will long regard the
mob as the rightful executioner ; and it
is by this crime, and this only, that the
lynching evil can be kept alive in the
South. It is not without reason, there-
fore, that so much of this paper is de-
voted to a discussion of how to stop the
offense which, under existing conditions,
will continue to provoke outbreaks of mob
violence, and which, even with a perfect
law, would mightily stir the passions of
the people.
There are two ways of working to
this end. We should (1) endeavor to
put such safeguards about those exposed
to the crime as to make its commission
less frequent, and (2) endeavor to de-
stroy the spirit of savagery and back-
wardness of which this offense is but
one of many evidences.
The first consideration of those who
seek direct methods of preventing the
crime is to provide better protection to
residents of isolated country districts.
Of course, the progress of civilization is
itself contributing to the solution of this
problem. As population becomes denser
and the people get into closer touch
with one another by means of good
roads, the criminal's chances of escape
correspondingly decrease, and crime dies
when the hope of escape dies. The ru-
ral telephone system, where it has been
introduced, is also a notable deterrent,
for, as a correspondent in another coun-
ty has just reminded me, " no sane man
is likely to commit a heinous crime in
a community where a network of wires
makes it easy to put the entire neigh-
borhood immediately on the alert."
But as yet these agencies are not
widespread, and for some years to
come we must depend on other rem-
edies. In the first place, the vagrancy
laws should be more strictly enforced,
VOL. xcni. — NO. 556. 11
and the public should be continually on
guard against the reckless, roving ele-
ment of blacks from which the criminal
class is chiefly recruited. The rural
districts should also have better police
protection. A member of the Georgia
Legislature last winter presented a bill
for a rural police patrol, — mounted
patrolmen to guard country residents
against tramps and criminals in much
the same way that the " patty-rollers "
of the Uncle Remus stories guarded the
people against vicious or runaway slaves.
This bill of Mr. Blackburn's attracted
much attention and much favorable
comment, and I shall not be surprised
to find the idea generally adopted by
Southern Legislatures within the next
ten years.
And now we come to the deeper and
profounder problem, — that of dealing
with the spirit back of the crime, the
spirit of degradation and animalism of
which the rapist is the most horrible
product. It is the old story of the
white man's burden. And we have the
old message so often repeated by the
late Dr. J. L. M. Curry : " We must
lift these people up or they will drag us
down."
Fraught with much meaning is the fact
that the crime against white women was
practically unknown in slavery ; that not
one of the hundreds of graduates who
have gone out from Hampton and Tuske-
gee has ever been guilty of it ; and that
of those who commit this crime to-day
few are able to read, have steady employ-
ment, or own homes. Ignorance, idle-
ness, thriftlessness, — out of these does
crime come, and against these must our
warfare be waged if we would destroy
the spirit that breeds crime. The dis-
cipline of steady labor is a wonderful
restraint on the passions, and the fact
that women were not attacked by even
the lowest negroes in slavery must be
chiefly attributed to this. Of the negro
prisoners in 1890 (the 1900 census fig-
ures on crime are not yet available), less
162
Lynching : A Southern View.
than one tenth had trades, and less than
two fifths were able to read and write.
I look then to right industrial, educa-
tional, and religious training as our chief
safeguard against negro crime. Only a
few weeks ago a friend of the writer's re-
ported this illustration : " Last year I
spent some time on one of the islands off
the Georgia coast where the negroes when
emancipated were as depraved as any-
where in the South. They even offered
libations to the moon. But into that mass
of ignorant blacks two good teachers
went, and set about uplifting the peo-
ple, morally, industrially, intellectually.
When I was there last summer the South-
ern lady with whom I stopped went with
her young daughter on a night trip of five
miles across the island, and without a
thought of danger."
But do the general, nation-wide results
indicate that education is helpful ? It
has often been claimed that they do not.
And in proof we have the oft-repeated
charge that the percentage of literacy
among negro criminals in 1890 was
higher than that for the total negro pop-
ulation, — in other words, that the lit-
erate negroes furnished a larger propor-
tion of prisoners than the illiterate.
This statement was made in an address
before the National Prison Association
in 1897. It was printed in one of our
foremost magazines, the North Ameri-
can Review, in June, 1900. It was re-
peated by a governor of Georgia in a
public message. A Mississippi preach-
er has sent it broadcast over the South,
and it was doubtless used in the re-
cent campaign in that state. Scores
of papers have copied it. Even now
a Southern daily which I have just
received has a two-column argument
against negro education, based on the
alleged census figures. " To school the
negro," says the writer, " is to increase
his criminality. Official statistics do not
lie, and they tell us that the negroes who
can read and write are more criminal
than the illiterate. In New England,
where they are best educated, they are
four and a half times as criminal as in
the Black Belt, where they are most ig-
norant. The more money for negro ed-
ucation, the more negro crime. This is
the unmistakable showing of the United
States Census."
That such statements as these have
thus far gone unchallenged should in-
deed excite our special wonder. It was
only a desire to get the exact figures
that led me to discover their falsity.
The truth is, that of the negro prisoners
in 1890 only 38.88 per cent were able
to read and write, while of the total
negro population 42.90 per cent were
able to read and write.1 And in every
division of the country save one (and
that with only a handful of negro crimi-
nals) the prisons testified that the liter-
ate negroes were less lawless than the
illiterate. To make the matter plain,
the following figures have been prepared
by the United States Bureau of Educa-
tion. They show the number of crimi-
nals furnished by each 100,000 colored
literates, and the number furnished by
each 100,000 colored illiterates, accord-
ing to the Census of 1890 : —
CRIMINALS IN EACH 100,000.
Section. Literates. Illiterates.
North Atlantic Division . . 828. '. .1174
South Atlantic Division . . 320 . . . 426
South Central Division .. 317 ... 498
North Central Division .. 807 ... 820
Western Division .... 542 . . . 518
When we consider that there were
only 258 negro prisoners in all the West-
ern Division (out of the 24,277 in the
Union), the mere accident that, of these
few, seven more than the exact propor-
tion came from the literate element loses
all significance ; the test is on a scale
too small for general conclusions. Sum-
ming up, it appears that of our total
colored population in 1890 each 100,000
illiterates furnished 489 criminals, and
1 See Compendium of Census, part iii. p. 300,
and Bulletin on Crime, Pauperism and Benevo-
lence, part i. p. 173.
Lynching : A Southern View.
163
each 100,000 literates only 413 crimi-
nals. Even more striking testimony
comes from the North Carolina State's
Prison situated in the writer's own city.
In the two years during which it has
kept a record, the proportion of negro
criminals from the illiterate class has
been forty per cent larger than from the
class which has had school training.
It is plain, therefore, that even with
the pitifully foolish and inefficient meth-
ods which have obtained heretofore,
the schooling the negro has had has
been helpful and not harmful. But we
must adopt a wiser policy. Industrial
education, as exemplified in Hampton
and Tuskegee Institutes, strikes directly
at the evils which foster crime ; and to
breathe the spirit of these institutions
into the general public school system of
the race is the imperative and immedi-
ate duty of those who have the matter
in charge. To delay in this means dan-
ger. It is the impotence and ineptness
of the old systems that have brought
people to doubt the wisdom of all negro
education. A direct result is the tri-
umph of Governor-elect Vardaman of
Mississippi, on the platform, " No white
taxes to teach negroes."
But even if the negro's schools were
not to be improved and rationalized, to
adopt the Vardaman policy would be
disastrous. It means either that we are
to abandon the black man to animalism,
and honeycomb the South with African
savagery, or that we are to surrender
his education to incensed leaders and
fanatical theorists, — and from their sow-
ing of dragons' teeth we have had har-
vest enough. The present prevalence
of negro crime is probably due in some
measure to unwholesome notions of social
equality and intermarriage that they
have inculcated, — the natural, elemental
passion to breed upward, to mate with a
higher order, called forth in violent form.
How much worse would be the condition
if the teaching of millions of negro chil-
dren were entirely surrendered to this
class ! We must abandon the errors in
our educational work, but not the work
itself.
And not only must we use the schools
to guide the young negroes into right
paths, but to stay the spread of crime
there must be greater cooperation be-
tween the religious leaders of the whites
and the religious leaders of the blacks.
The strongest religious denomination in
the South will make a step in this direc-
tion at its next general convention. As
a factor in actual life negro religion
now counts for almost nothing, and the
moral instruction of the young is prob-
ably inferior to that given by the slave-
holders of the Upper South. Hysterical
preaching is more popular than Biblical
teaching. A typical illustration has just
come to my notice. An intelligent,
educated negro pastor had been labor-
ing earnestly with his congregation, try-
ing to raise their morals and give them
worthier ideals. He went away for a
week, and found on his return that
he had been supplanted. An old-time
" mourner " preacher, appealing only to
the emotions, had captivated the mem-
bership by making everybody " happy."
Writing of this problem in a recent
Hampton Institute publication, Frances
A. Kellor says : " The religious life of
the negro to-day, with its mysticism,
superstition, and excesses, in some cases
predisposes to crime. It accentuates an
excess of emotion, which condition is
traced in many criminal cases." And
yet we are sending missionaries thou-
sands of miles to Africa while the Africa
at our own doors goes neglected.
The white people of the South should
do their full duty in providing proper
educational and religious training for
the blacks, and then they should hold
the negro leaders largely responsible for
the moral condition of the race. As
one of the most thoughtful and conserv-
ative North Carolina editors has said :
" The negro preachers, teachers, and
leaders must be made to feel their
164
Lynching : A /Southern View.
responsibility for negro crime. They
should manufacture an anti-raping sen-
timent, and force it down through the
several strata of their society until it
touches bottom ; then outrages would
cease. They have not done it. Instead
they have virtually encouraged the crime
by denouncing only its punishment by
the mob." So careful a journal as the
Review of Reviews has commented on
this indifference on the part of the
colored leaders. " Why do they bother
themselves so much about the lynching
of negro criminals and so little about
the hideousness of negro crime ? " asks
Dr. Shaw. "Here we have the most
painful aspect of the whole problem."
This condition, moreover, is reflected
in the negro's general attitude toward
law. Not a guardian protecting his
rights, but an enemy restricting his free-
dom, has always been his conception of
government. Lynching would be much
less frequently resorted to, if the negroes,
instead of concealing and shielding their
criminals, would disown them and coop-
erate with the whites in the endeavor to
punish them.
But let us also deal honestly with our-
selves. Let us see to it that we place
no stumbling-block in the path of the
weaker race. Here, for example, is a
charge which comes, I believe, from
Dr. H. B. Frissell, of Hampton Insti-
tute : " The way in which many re-
spectable, intelligent colored girls are
hounded by white men of the baser sort
does much to create bitterness among
the negroes, and leads them to palliate
the crimes of their own race." If this
condition exists in any degree whatever
we ought to free ourselves from the
shame of it. The pressure of outraged
public opinion should be strongly brought
to bear on any white man who by any
means encourages immorality among
negro women. It is demoralizing. It
is unworthy of our race. It reacts to
our hurt. The bestiality of negro men
is fostered by the unchastity of negro
women. No form of racial amalgamation
must find toleration among the whites.
Here, too, is a charge by Professor
W. H. Council, one of our best-known
negro educators : " The negroes are bru-
talized, prepared for a career of crime, by
low saloons and dens of vice, and these
vice-factories owe their existence to white
people. The blacks make no laws, they
execute no laws. No judge or board of
aldermen would allow the establishment
of a saloon on the petition of negroes
alone." In view of the earnestness with
which we have sought to protect the In-
dian against the demoralizing effects of
drink and vice, it is surprising that the
phase of the matter to which Professor
Council alludes has not had more atten-
tion. I would commend to other states
the action of our last North Carolina
Legislature in abolishing all saloons in
rural districts. In a community in which
the whites are in a minority, and without
police protection, it is little less than
suicidal to keep a bar-room to inflame
the passions and derange the reasons of
criminally disposed negroes.
in.
And the outlook — what of it ? I see
no reason whatever for pessimism. The
careful reader has probably anticipated
this point, and has perceived that three
notable forces are making against the
progress of the mob spirit.
1. The delays, the technicalities, the
solemn plausibilities of our legal machin-
ery have done much to promote the evil.
But now there are unmistakable signs of
a public awakening. Reforms will fol-
low, and lynching will become less fre-
quent as law becomes more effective.
2. The sudden translation of the ne-
gro from a state of slavery to that of
freedom and political prestige engen-
dered unnatural aspirations and unwhole-
some tendencies. With many, to avoid
manual labor and to get social recognition
among the whites became a ruling pas-
sion. But now the leaders of the race are
Recollections of Lincoln.
165
beginning to lay emphasis on the fun-
damentals, industry and character, as of
more importance than political ambition
or a veneering of impossible " culture."
A Booker Washington, who trains work-
ers, and who preaches peace and self-re-
liance, has succeeded a Frederick Doug-
lass, whose business was politics, and who
preached social equality and practiced
miscegenation. The change is to uplift
negro character, and to decrease lynch-
ings by decreasing the crimes which pro-
voke lynching.
- 3. The isolation of our rural districts
has made effective police protection im-
possible, thus widening the opportuni-
ties for crime and the opportunities for
the punishment of crime by the mob.
But with the coming of denser population
and quicker means of communication, the
diminished number of crimes and the
greater efficiency of the law will alike
insure the decadence of the mob spirit.
In its deepest meaning, lynch law is
only a belated outcropping of primitive
anarchy, a symptom of an immature
civilization. The development of the
reforms I have indicated will bring the
day when it can no longer exist in an
American atmosphere.
Clarence H. Poe.
RECOLLECTIONS OF LINCOLN.
[The following recollections of Abraham Lincoln are from the pen of the late Henry Villard,
war correspondent and financier, and form part of his autobiography, which is shortly to appear
in book form. Mr. Villard came to the United States from Germany in 1853, and as soon as he
bad mastered the English language began newspaper work, contributing to various New York
and Western journals. He first met Mr. Lincoln while reporting the Lincoln-Douglas debate
for the New York Staats-Zeitung, as stated below. From that time on it was his good fortune
to see a great deal of Mr. Lincoln, and to accompany him to New York on his journey to Wash-
ington for his inauguration, and to win Mr. Lincoln's confidence. He was in turn able to be of
service to Mr. Lincoln in various ways, as, for instance, in bringing to the President the first au-
thentic account of the condition of the Ariny of the Potomac after the battle of Fredericksburg.
— THE EDITORS.]
nothing in favor of Lincoln. He had a
lean, lank, indescribably gawky figure,
an odd-featured, wrinkled, inexpressive,
and altogether uncomely face. He used
singularly awkward, almost absurd, up-
and-down and sidewise movements of his
body to give emphasis to his arguments.
His voice was naturally good, but he fre-
quently raised it to an unnatural pitch.
Yet the unprejudiced mind felt at once
that, while there was on the one side a
skillful dialectician and debater arguing
a wrong and weak cause, there was on
the other a thoroughly earnest and truth-
ful man, inspired by sound convictions
in consonance with the true spirit of
THE LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATES.
THE first jointdebate between Douglas
and Lincoln which I attended (the sec-
ond in the series of seven) took place
on the afternoon of August 27, 1858, at
Freeport, Illinois. It was the great event
of the day, and attracted an immense
concourse of people from all parts of the
state. Douglas spoke first for an hour,
followed by Lincoln for an hour and
a half ; upon which the former closed
in another half hour. The Democratic
spokesman commanded a strong, sono-
rous voice, a rapid, vigorous utterance, a
telling play of countenance, impressive
gestures, and all the other arts of the
practiced speaker. As far as all exter-
nal conditions were concerned, there was
American institutions. There was no-
thing in all Douglas's powerful effort
that appealed to the higher instincts of
166
Recollections of Lincoln.
human nature, while Lincoln always
touched sympathetic chords. Lincoln's
speech excited and sustained the enthu-
siasm of his audience to the end. When
he had finished, two stalwart young farm-
ers rushed on the platform, and, in spite
of his remonstrances, seized and put him
on their shoulders and carried him in that
uncomfortable posture for a considerable
distance. It was really a ludicrous sight
to see the grotesque figure holding fran-
tically to the heads of his supporters,
with his legs dangling from their shoul-
ders, and his pantaloons pulled up so as
to expose his underwear almost to his
knees. Douglas made dexterous use of
this incident in his next speech, express-
ing sincere regret that, against his wish,
he had used up his old friend Lincoln so
completely that he had to be carried off
the stage. Lincoln retaliated by saying
at the first opportunity that he had known
Judge Douglas long and well, but there
was nevertheless one thing he could not
say of him, and that was that the Judge
always told the truth.
I was introduced to Lincoln at Free-
port, and met him frequently afterwards
in the course of the campaign. I must
say frankly that, although I found him
most approachable, good-natured, and full
of wit and humor, I could not take a real
personal liking to the man, owing to an
inborn weakness for which he was even
then notorious and so remained during
his great public career. He was inordi-
nately fond of jokes, anecdotes, and sto-
ries. He loved to hear them, and still
more to tell them himself out of the in-
exhaustible supply provided by his good
memory and his fertile fancy. There
would have been no harm in this but for
the fact that, the coarser the joke, the
lower the anecdote, and the more risky
the story, the more he enjoyed them,
especially when they were of his own
invention. He possessed, moreover, a
singular ingenuity in bringing about oc-
casions in conversation for indulgences of
this kind. I have to confess, too, that,
aside from the prejudice against him
which I felt on this account, I shared
the belief of a good many independent
thinkers at the time, including prominent
leaders of the Republican party, that,
with regard to separating more effec-
tively the anti-slavery Northern from the
pro-slavery Southern wing of the Demo-
cracy, it would have been better if the
reelection of Douglas had not been op-
posed.
The party warfare was hotly continued
in all parts of the state from early sum-
mer till election day in November. Be-
sides the seven joint debates, both Doug-
las and Lincoln spoke scores of times
separately, and numerous other speakers
from Illinois and other states contributed
incessantly to the agitation. The two
leaders visited almost every county in
the state. I heard four of the joint de-
bates, and six other speeches by Lincoln
and eight by his competitor. Of course,
the later efforts became substantial repeti-
tions of the preceding ones, and to listen
to them grew more and more tiresome to
me. As I had seen something of politi-
cal campaigns before, this one did not
exercise the full charm of novelty upon
me. Still, even if I had been a far more
callous observer, I could not have helped
being struck with the efficient party or-
ganizations, the skillful tactics of the man-
agers, the remarkable feats of popular
oratory, and the earnestness and enthu-
siasm of the audiences I witnessed. It
was a most instructive object-lesson in
practical party politics, and filled me
with admiration for the Anglo-Ameri-
can method of working out popular des-
tiny.
In other respects, my experiences were
not altogether agreeable. It was a very
hot summer, and I was obliged to travel
almost continuously. Illinois had then
only about a million and a half of in-
habitants, poorly constructed railroads,
and bad country roads, over which latter
I had to journey quite as much as over
the former. The taverns in town and
Recollections of Lincoln.
167
country, as a rule, were wretched ; and,
as I moved about with the candidates and
their followers and encountered crowds
everywhere, I fared miserably in many
places. Especially in the southern part •
of the state, then known as " Egypt "
and mostly inhabited by settlers from the
Southern states, food and lodging were
nearly always simply abominable. I
still vividly remember the day of semi-
starvation, and the night with half-a-
dozen room-mates, I passed at Jonesboro',
where the third joint debate took place.
I saw more of Illinois than I have
since seen of any other state in the Union,
and I acquired a thorough faith, based
on the immeasurable fertility of her
prairies, in the great growth that she has
since attained. I also formed many val-
uable acquaintances, a number of which
have continued to this day. It was then
that I first saw my lifelong friend Horace
White, who accompanied Mr. Lincoln as
the representative of the Chicago Tri-
bune, and R. R. Hitt, the official steno-
grapher of the Republican candidate.
He was one of the most skilled shorthand
writers in the country, and his success as
such led in due time to his appointment
as reporter of the United States Supreme
Court. This position he resigned for a
successful career as diplomat and Con-
gressman.
I firmly believe that, if Stephen A.
Douglas had lived, he would have had a
brilliant national career. Freed by the
Southern rebellion from all identification
with pro-slavery interests, the road would
have been open to the highest fame and
position for which his unusual talents
qualified him. As I took final leave of
him and Lincoln, doubtless neither of
them had any idea that within two years
they would be rivals again in the Presi-
dential race. I had it from Lincoln's
own lips that the United States Senator-
ship was the greatest political height he
at the time expected to climb. He was
full of doubt, too, of his ability to secure
the majority of the Legislature against
Douglas. These confidences he imparted
to me on a special occasion which I must
not omit to mention in detail before leav-
ing this subject.
He and I met accidentally, about nine
o'clock on a hot, sultry evening, at a flag
railroad station about twenty miles west
of Springfield, on my return from a
great meeting at Petersburg in Menard
County. He had been driven to the sta-
tion in a buggy and left there alone. I
was already there. The train that we
intended to take for Springfield was
about due. After vainly waiting for half
an hour for its arrival, a thunderstorm
compelled us to take refuge in an empty
freight car standing on a side track, there
being no buildings of any sort at the
station. We squatted down on the floor
of the car and fell to talking on all sorts
of subjects. It was then and there he
told me that, when he was clerking in a
country store, his highest political ambi-
tion was to be a member of the state
Legislature. " Since then, of course,"
he said laughingly, " I have grown some,
but my friends got me into this business
[meaning the canvass]. I did not con-
sider myself qualified for the United
States Senate, and it took me a long time
to persuade myself that I was. Now,
to be sure," he continued, with another
of his peculiar laughs, " I am convinced
that I am good enough for it ; but, in
spite of it all, I am saying to myself
every day : ' It is too big a thing for
you ; you will never get it.' Mary [his
wife] insists, however, that I am going
to be Senator and President of the Unit-
ed States, too." These last words he
followed with a roar of laughter, with
his arms around his knees, and shaking
all over with mirth at his wife's ambi-
tion. " Just think," he exclaimed, " of
such a sucker as me as President ! "
He then fell to asking questions re-
garding my antecedents, and expressed
some surprise at my fluent use of Eng-
lish after so short a residence in the
United States. Next he wanted to know
168
Recollections of Lincoln.
whether it was true that most of the edu-
cated people in Germany were " infi-
dels." I answered that they were not
openly professed infidels, but such a con-
clusion might be drawn from the fact
that most of them were not church-goers.
" I do not wonder at that," he rejoined ;
" my own inclination is that way." I
ventured to give expression to my own
disbelief in the doctrine of the Christian
Church relative to the existence of God,
the divinity of Christ, and immortality.
This led him to put other questions to me
to draw me out. He did not commit him-
self, but I received the impression that
he was of my own way of thinking. It
was no surprise to me, therefore, to find
in the writings of his biographers Ward
Hill Lamon and W. H. Herndon that I
had correctly understood him. Our talk
continued till half-past ten, when the
belated train arrived. I cherish this
accidental rencontre as one of my most
precious recollections, since my compan-
ion of that night has become one of the
greatest figures in history.
I went from Jonesboro' to Chicago,
and remained there till after the election.
I considered the outcome so uncertain
that I did not venture any predictions in
my correspondence. Douglas himself, I
knew, was much in doubt ; Lincoln and
his friends were very confident, and there-
fore bitterly disappointed by the result.
LINCOLN AND THE BUFFALO ROBE.
[In 1859 Mr. Villard went as correspondent
of the Cincinnati Commercial to Colorado to
report upon the newly discovered gold regions.
On his return journey over the plains, which
was made in a two-horse wagon, there occurred
the meeting described by him as follows : — ]
About thirty miles from St. Joseph
an extraordinary incident occurred. A
buggy with two occupants was coming
toward us over the open prairie. As it
approached, I thought I recognized one
of them, and, sure enough, it turned out
to be no less a person than Abraham
Lincoln! I stopped the wagon, called
him by name, and jumped off to shake
hands. He did not recognize me with
my full beard and pioneer's costume.
When I said, " Don't you know me ? "
and gave my name, he looked at me,
most amazed, and then burst out laugh-
ing. " Why, good gracious ! you look
like a real Pike's Peaker." His surprise
at this unexpected meeting was as great
as mine. He was on a lecturing tour
through Kansas. It was a cold morn-
ing, and the wind blew cuttingly from
the northwest. He was shivering in the
open buggy, without even a roof over it,
in a short overcoat, and without any
covering for his legs. I offered him one
of my buffalo robes, which he gratefully
accepted. He undertook, of course, to
return it to me, but I never saw it again.
After ten minutes' chat, we separated.
The next time I saw him he was the Re-
publican candidate for the Presidency.
SPRINGFIELD.
[In the last days of November, 1860, the As-
sociated Press sent Mr. Villard to Springfield,
Illinois, to report current events at that place
by telegraph, until the departure of Mr. Lin-
coln for Washington. This duty brought Mr.
Villard into daily relations with the President-
elect, who gave him a most friendly welcome
and bade him ask for information at any time
he wished it.]
Mr. Lincoln soon found, after his elec-
tion, that his modest two-story frame
dwelling was altogether inadequate for
the throng of local callers and of visitors
from a distance, and, accordingly, he
gladly availed himself of the offer of the
use of the governor's room in the Cap-
itol building. On my arrival, he had
already commenced spending a good part
of each day in it. He appeared daily,
except Sundays, between nine and ten
o'clock, and held a reception till noon,
to which all comers were admitted, with-
out even the formality of first sending in
cards. Whoever chose to call received
the same hearty greeting. At noon, he
went home to dinner and reappeared at
about two. Then his correspondence was
given proper attention, and visitors of
Recollections of Lincoln.
169
distinction were seen by special appoint-
ment at either the State House or the
hotel. Occasionally, but very rarely, he
passed some time in his law office. In
the evening, old friends called at his
home for the exchange of news and polit-
ical views. At times, when important
news was expected, he would go to the
telegraph or newspaper offices after sup-
per, and stay there till late. Altogether,
probably no other president-elect was so
approachable to everybody, at least dur-
ing the first weeks of my stay. But he
found in the end, as was to be expect-
ed, that this popular practice involved a
good deal of fatigue, and that he needed
more time for himself ; and the hours he
gave up to the public were gradually
restricted.
I was present almost daily for more or
less time during his morning receptions.
I generally remained a silent listener, as
I could get at him at other hours when I
was in need of information. It was a
most interesting study to watch the man-
ner of his intercourse with callers. As
a rule, he showed remarkable tact in
dealing with each of them, whether they
were rough-looking Sangamon County
farmers still addressing him familiarly
as " Abe," sleek and pert commercial
travelers, staid merchants, sharp politi-
cians, or preachers^ lawyers, or other
professional men. He showed a very
quick and shrewd perception of and
adaptation to individual characteristics
and peculiarities. He never evaded a
proper question, or failed to give a fit
answer. He was ever ready for an ar-
gument, which always had an original
flavor, and, as a rule, he got the better
in the discussion. There was, however,
one limitation to the freedom of his talks
with his visitors. A great many of them
naturally tried to draw him out as to his
future policy as President regarding the
secession movement in the South, but he
would not commit himself. The most
remarkable and attractive feature of
those daily "levees," however, was his
constant indulgence of his story-telling
propensity. Of course, all the visitors
had heard of it and were eager for the
privilege of listening to a practical illus-
tration of his preeminence in that line.
He knew this, and took special delight
in meeting their wishes. He never was
at a loss for a story or an anecdote to
explain a meaning or enforce a point, the
aptness of which was always perfect.
His supply was apparently inexhaustible,
and the stories sounded so real that it
was hard to determine whether he re-
peated what he had heard from others,
or had invented himself.
None of his hearers enjoyed the wit —
and wit was an unfailing ingredient —
of his stories half as much as he did
himself. It was a joy indeed to see the
effect upon him. A high-pitched laughter
lighted up his otherwise melancholy
countenance with thorough merriment.
His body shook all over with gleeful
emotion, and when he felt particularly
good over his performance, he followed
his habit of drawing his knees, with his
arms around them, up to his very face,
as I had seen him do in 1858. I am
sorry to state that he often allowed him-
self altogether too much license in the
concoction of the stories. He seemed to
be bent upon making his hit by fair
means or foul. In other words, he never
hesitated to tell a coarse or even outright
nasty story, if it served his purpose. All
his personal friends could bear testimony
on this point. It was a notorious fact
that this fondness for low talk clung to
him even in the White House. More
than once I heard him " with malice
aforethought " get off purposely some
repulsive fiction in order to rid himself
of an uncomfortable caller. Again and
again I felt disgust and humiliation that
such a person should have been called
upon to direct the destinies of a great
nation in the direst period of its history.
Yet his achievements during the next
few years proved him to be one of the
great leaders of mankind in adversity, in
170
Recollections of Lincoln.
whom low leanings only set off more
strikingly his better qualities. At the
time of which I speak, I could not have
persuaded myself that the man might
possibly possess true greatness of mind
and nobility of heart. I do not wish to
convey the idea, however, that he was
mainly given to trivialities and vulgari-
ties in his conversation ; for, in spite of
his frequent outbreaks of low humor, his
was really a very sober and serious na-
ture, and even inclined to gloominess to
such an extent that all his biographers
have attributed a strongly melancholic
disposition to him.
I often availed myself of his authori-
zation to come to him at any time for
information. There were two questions
in which the public, of course, felt the
deepest interest, and upon which I was
expected to supply light, namely, the
composition of his Cabinet, and his views
upon the secession movement that was
daily growing in extent and strength.
As to the former, he gave me to un-
derstand early, by indirection, that, as
everybody expected, William H. Seward
and S. P. Chase, his competitors for
the presidential nomination, would be
among his constitutional advisers. It was
hardly possible for him not to recognize
them, and he steadily turned a deaf ear
to the remonstrances that were made
against them as " extreme men " by
leading politicians from the Border
States, particularly from Kentucky and
Missouri. As to the remaining mem-
bers of his Cabinet, they were definitely
selected much later, and after a pro-
tracted and wearisome tussle with the
delegations of various states that came
to Springfield to urge the claims of their
" favorite sons." I shall refer again to
this subject.
No one who heard him talk upon the
other question could fail to discover his
" other side," and to be impressed with
his deep earnestness, his anxious con-
templation of public affairs, and his
thorough sense of the extraordinary re-
sponsibilities that were coming upon
him. He never refused to talk with me
about secession, but generally evaded
answers to specific interrogatories, and
confined himself to generalizations. I
was present at a number of conversa-
tions which he had with leading public
men upon the same subject, when he
showed the same reserve. He did not
hesitate to say that the Union ought to,
and in his opinion would, be preserved,
and to go into long arguments in sup-
port of the proposition, based upon the
history of the republic, the homogeneity
of the population, the natural features
of the country, such as the common
coast, the rivers and mountains, that
compelled political and commercial unity.
But he could not be got to say what he
would do in the face of Southern seces-
sion, except that as President he should
be sworn to maintain the Constitution
of the United States, and that he was
therefore bound to fulfill that duty. He
met in the same general way the fre-
quent questions whether he should con-
sider it his duty to resort to coercion by
force of arms against the states engaged
in attempts to secede. In connection
therewith I understood him, however,
several times to express doubts as to
the practicability of holding the slave
states in the Union by main force, if
they were all determined to break it up.
He was often embarrassed by efforts of
radical anti-slavery men to get something
out of him in encouragement of their
hopes that the crisis would result in the
abolition of slavery. He did not respond
as they wished, and made it clear that
he did not desire to be considered an
" abolitionist," and that he still held the
opinion that property in slaves was en-
titled to protection under the Constitu-
tion, and that its owners could not be
deprived of it without due compensation.
Consciously or unconsciously, he, like
everybody else, must have been influ-
enced in his views by current events.
As political passion in the South rose
Recollections of Lincoln.
171
higher and higher, and actual defiance
of Federal authority by deeds of violence
occurred almost daily after his election,
culminating in the formal secession of
seven states and the establishment of
the Southern Confederacy under Jeffer-
son Davis at Montgomery, Alabama,
the belief, which he doubtless had origi-
nally, that by a conciliatory course as
President he could pacify the rebellious
states, must have become shaken. Still,
I think I interpret his views up to the
time of his departure for Washington
correctly in saying that he had not lost
faith in the preservation of peace be-
tween the North and the South, and he
certainly did not dream that his princi-
pal duty would be to raise great armies
and fleets, and the means to maintain
them, for the suppression of the most
determined and sanguinary rebellion, in
defense of slavery, that our planet ever
witnessed.
The Jacksonian " doctrine " that " to
the victors belong the spoils " was still
so universally the creed of all politicians,
that it was taken for granted there
would be a change not only in all the
principal, but also in all the minor, Fed-
eral offices. It was also expected that
the other time-honored party practice of
a division of executive patronage among
the several states would be carried out.
Accordingly there appeared deputations
from all the Northern and Border
States at Springfield to put in their re-
spective claims for recognition. Some
of them came not only once, but several
times. From a number of states sev-
eral delegations turned up, representing
rival factions in the Republican ranks,
each pretending to be the rightful claim-
ant. Almost every state presented can-
didates for the Cabinet and for the prin-
cipal diplomatic and departmental offices.
The hotel was the principal haunt of the
place-hunters. The tricks, the intrigues,
and the manoauvres that were practiced
by them in pursuit of their aims came
nearly all within the range of my obser-
vation, as it was my duty to furnish the
earliest possible news of their success or
failure. As a rule, the various sets of
spoilsmen were very willing to take me
into their confidence, but it was not al-
ways easy to distinguish what was true
in their communications from what they
wished me to say to the press purely in
furtherance of their interests. Among
the political visitors the most prominent
I met were : Simon Cameron, S. P.
Chase, Thurlow Weed, Lyman Trum-
bull, N. B. Judd, Richard J. Oglesby,
Francis P. Blair, Sr. and Jr., B. Gratz
Brown, William Dennison, D. C. Carter
of Ohio, Henry J. Winter, and Oliver
P. Morton. Thurlow Weed was by far
the most interesting figure and the most
astute operator among them all.
From what I have said, it will be
understood that the President-elect had
a hard time of it with the office-seekers.
But as he himself was a thorough be-
liever in the doctrine of rotation in
office, he felt it his duty to submit to
this tribulation. The Cabinet appoint-
ments, other than those already named,
were especially troublesome to him.
There was an intense struggle between
Indiana and Illinois, most embarrassing
inasmuch as there were several candi-
dates from his own state, all intimate
personal friends. Then came the bitter
contest between the Border States of
Kentucky, Missouri, and Maryland, and
the Pennsylvania cabals pro and contra
Simon Cameron. Amidst all his per-
plexities, Lincoln displayed a good deal
of patience and shrewdness in dealing
with these personal problems. His nev-
er-failing stories helped many times to
heal wounded feelings and mitigate dis-
appointments. But he gradually showed
the wear and tear of these continuous
visitations, and finally looked so careworn
as to excite one's compassion.
THE JOURNEY TO WASHINGTON.
During the month of January, 1861,
there appeared in Springfield one W. S.
172
Recollections of Lincoln.
Wood, a former hotel manager and or-
ganizer of pleasure excursions, I believe,
from the interior of New York state,
who, on the recommendation of Thur-
low Weed, was to take charge of all the
arrangements for the journey of the
President-elect to Washington. He was
a man of comely appearance, greatly
impressed with the importance of his
mission, and inclined to assume airs of
consequence and condescension. As he
showed a disposition to ignore me, I
made a direct appeal to Mr. Lincoln,
who instructed him that I was to be one
of the presidential party. In fact, I
was the only member of the press form-
ing part of it as far as Cincinnati, al-
though Messrs. Nicolay and Hay, for
some unexplained reason, fail to men-
tion me in naming the members of the
party.
The start on the memorable journey
was made shortly after eight o'clock
on the morning of Monday, February
11. It was a clear, crisp winter day.
Only about one hundred people, mostly
personal friends, were assembled at the
station to shake hands for the last time
with their distinguished townsman. It
was not strange that he yielded to the
sad feelings which must have moved
him at the thought of what lay behind
and what was before him, and gave
them utterance in a pathetic formal fare-
well to the gathering crowd, as fol-
lows : —
" My Friends, — No one not in my
position can appreciate the sadness I feel
at this parting. To this people I owe
all that I am. Here I have lived more
than a quarter of a century ; here my
children were born, and here one of them
lies buried. I know not how soon I
shall see you again. A duty devolves
upon me which is, perhaps, greater than
that which has devolved upon any other
man since the days of Washington. He
never would have succeeded except for
the aid of Divine Providence, upon which
he at all times relied. I feel that I can-
not succeed without the same Divine aid
which sustained him, and in the same
Almighty Being I place my reliance
for support ; and I hope you, my friends,
will all pray that I may receive that
Divine assistance, without which I can-
not succeed, but with which success is
certain. Again I bid you all an affec-
tionate farewell."
I reproduce this here, as but for me
it would not have been preserved in the
exact form in which it was delivered.
It was entirely extemporized, and, know-
ing this, I prevailed on Mr. Lincoln,
immediately after starting, to write it out
for me on a " pad." I sent it over the
wires from the first telegraph station.
I kept the pencil manuscript for some
time, but, unfortunately, lost it in my
wanderings in the course of the civil
war.
Our traveling companions at the start
were (besides Mr. and Mrs. Lincoln and
their three sons) W. S. Wood; J. G.
Nicolay and John Hay ; two old personal
friends of Mr. Lincoln, Judge David
Davis of Bloomington, afterwards As-
sociate Justice of the United States Su-
preme Court, and N. B. Judd of Chicago,
who had the promise of the Secretaryship
of the Interior ; Dr. W. S. Wallace, a
brother-in-law ; Lockwood Todd, a rela-
tive of Mrs. Lincoln, who was employed
on several important political missions
during the next few months ; and Ward
Hill Lamon, a lawyer of Bloomington,
who afterwards became United States
Marshal for the District of Columbia,
and as such a sort of major-domo at the
White House, and finally the author of a
biography of Abraham Lincoln. For de-
scribing him in this as an infidel Lamon
was much and unjustly attacked. He
brought a banjo along, and amused us
with negro songs. There was also a mili-
tary escort, consisting of Colonel Ed-
win Vose Sumner, the white-haired com-
mander of a cavalry regiment of the
regular army, and of Major David Hun-
ter, Captain John Pope, and Captain
Recollections of Lincoln.
173
Hazard of the same service. Colonel
Suraner, Major Hunter, and Captain
Pope became well-known commanding
generals during the war. Another " mili-
tary " character, a sort of pet of Mr.
Lincoln, was Colonel E. E. Ellsworth,
who, though a mere youth, of small
but broad figure, curly black head, and
handsome features, had achieved con-
siderable local notoriety as a captain
of a crack " Zouave " militia company in
Chicago. He was one of the first victims
of the civil war, being shot by a rebel
while raising the United States flag at
Alexandria, Virginia.
The party had a special train, com-
posed at first only of an ordinary passen-
ger car, — there were no parlor or draw-
ing-room or sleeping cars in those days,
— a baggage-car, and engine. The first
day's journey took us from the capital of
Illinois to that of Indiana. Until we
reached the boundary of the latter state,
the demonstrations along the route were
insignificant, except at Decatur, where a
great crowd, headed by Richard J. Ogles-
by, then a hotel-keeper, but subsequently
a general in the war, Governor, and
United States Senator, greeted the future
Chief Magistrate, who delivered another
farewell speech. At the boundary, the
train was boarded by a large delegation
of leading Indianians, including Schuyler
Colfax, Henry S. Lane, Caleb B. Smith,
and Thomas H. Nelson. At Lafayette,
a great crowd awaited our coming, and
the President-elect had to appear and
speak to them. At Indianapolis, where
the first day's journey ended, he was
formally welcomed by Governor Oliver
P. Morton, and replied to him at length.
His speech was remarkable for the first
public intimation that he should consider
it his duty as President to retake the
properties of the United States, including
the forts unlawfully seized by the rebel-
lious states, and otherwise reestablish the
authority of the Federal Government.
The next stage of the journey was
from Indianapolis to Cincinnati ; the
third, from Cincinnati to Columbus ; the
fourth, from Columbus to Pittsburg ;
the fifth, from Pittsburg to Cleveland ;
the sixth, from Cleveland to Buffalo,
where a rest was taken over Sunday.
The eighth day the journey was contin-
ued as far as Albany, and on the follow-
ing day we reached New York. Every-
where there were formal welcomes by the
state or municipal authorities and by
great crowds of people, with brass bands,
and public and private receptions. In
different localities pleasant variations
were offered in the way of serenades,
torchlight processions, and gala theatri-
cal performances. Altogether, the Presi-
dent had every reason to feel flattered
and encouraged by the demonstrations in
his honor. But the journey was a very
great strain upon his physical and mental
strength, and he was well-nigh worn out
when he reached Buffalo. He must have
spoken at least fifty times during the
week. In the kindness of his heart —
not from any love of adulation, for he
really felt very awkward about it — he
never refused to respond to a call for his
appearance wherever the train stopped.
While he thus satisfied the public curi-
osity, he disappointed, by his appearance,
most of those who saw him for the first
time. I could see that impression clearly
written on the faces of his rustic audi-
ences. Nor was this surprising, for they
certainly saw the most unprepossessing
features, the gawkiest figure, and the most
awkward manners. Lincoln always had
an embarrassed air. too, like a country
clodhopper appearing in fashionable so-
ciety, and was nearly always stiff and
unhappy in his off-hand remarks. The
least creditable performance en route was
his attempt to say something on the ques-
tion of tariff legislation in his Pittsburg
speech. What he said was really nothing
but crude, ignorant twaddle, without
point or meaning. It proved him to be
the veriest novice in economic matters,
and strengthened my doubts as to his
capacity for the high office he was to fill.
174
Strange Instrument of Many Strings.
So poor was his talk that most of the
Republican papers, while they printed it,
abstained from comment.
After ten days of the wearisome same-
ness of the " performances " at the sever-
al halting-places, I was very sick of the
" traveling show," and I therefore asked
to be relieved from my duties on reach-
ing New York. My request was granted,
and I remained behind. It turned out
that I lost only the reception in Inde-
pendence Hall in Philadelphia, as the
journey was cut short by the incognito
night run of the President from Harris-
burg to Washington. This sudden move
on his part created at the time consid-
erable disappointment, even among his
warmest political followers, being regard-
ed as an evidence of unwarranted fear.
But subsequent events and developments
proved his course to have been a wise
one.
Henry Villard.
STRANGE INSTRUMENT OF MANY STRINGS.
THOU instrument of many strings
For men to play on, slaves and kings,
Let me but keep thee, Life, in tune,
That fall what may, by night or noon,
Still in the heart shall sing for me
One clear and constant melody.
Too oft the clamor and the strife
Of living quench the notes of life ;
Too oft they lose their customed way,
In alien sequences to stray.
Yet ever stealing back, they fall
Into the cadence sought through all.
Then grief and gladness, love and pain
Blend all their harmonies again ;
The heavens uplift a shining arch
Spacious above the soul's brave march :
If I but keep thee, night and noon,,
Ever and truly, Life, in tune —
Strange instrument of many strings
For slaves to play on, and for kings.
M. A. DeWolfe Howe.
The Shadow.
175
THE SHADOW.
JOHN BARRINGTON, whose sombre and
exceptional history I am going to tell,
suggested, when I first knew him, no-
thing either sombre or exceptional. He
was an undergraduate at Harvard in the
earliest eighties, and will be recalled by
all his contemporaries there as big Jack
Barrington. The mention of this name,
so far from suggesting to those who knew
him anything tragic, may, if their memo-
ries are acute, evoke a vision not only
commonplace, but touched with remi-
niscent humor. For before their mind's
eye will rise a youth, tall, florid, and
handsome, to be sure, but dressed in the
height of the absurd style of those days,
— an incredibly shallow derby hat, a cut-
away coat of rough material, a high-cut
waistcoat of gorgeous colors, with a bril-
liant watchchain extending from one up-
per pocket to the other, and patent leather
shoes preposterously long and pointed.
Still, after all, the clothes — as much
extravagant apparel has done before and
will do again — expressed the joy and
glory of youth.
He was a Western man, rich, lavish,
very popular. His success with the fel-
lows he owed to his smile, and to the
democratic, indiscriminate way in which
he lavished it. His cordial eye, his reg-
ular white teeth, his whole round, fresh-
colored, good-humored face, made this
smile very charming. Health and good
humor radiated from him ; he seemed to
like every one, and certainly every one
liked him. I can see him now — the
centre and the leader of a group of ex-
clusive youths — sauntering through the
yard, and smiling his irresistible smile
upon the unfashionable, the poor, the shy,
the " grinds," — upon every one whom
so magnificent a creature might be expect-
ed not to want to know, and I fully under-
stand his amazing popularity.
A butterfly he doubtless was, but one
who did not seem doomed after that one
sunshiny hour. There seemed no rea-
son why he should not live through all
of a long life in the same care-free, hap-
py way. Some brilliant urban society
seemed his natural playground in winter ;
Newport or Europe his natural place of
recreation in summer. I think that many
a poor classmate envied him his roseate
future.
A man, as I discovered afterwards, of
much sensibility, he had the gift of grace-
ful expression — whether with tongue
or pen. This — with the smile — car-
ried him on to the staff of one of the
college papers. As I also was chosen
an editor, I met him, and underwent
the charm of his splendor and affability.
For some reason — perhaps because all
men like a faithful, unquestioning wor-
shiper — he liked me, and I, happy in
his friendship, followed him about, as
much a slave of his as the bulldog
which usually trotted at his heels. I was
not ashamed of my subjection : I had
much company, and the post was one of
honor.
When Barrington was graduated, he
went to New York and bought aseat in the
Stock Exchange. I, on the other hand,
became principal of a high school in a
small and rather remote village in New
Hampshire. As it happened, none of
my classmates lived very near me, and
all I could learn of my college friends
was what I gleaned from the periodic
reports of our class secretary. Barring-
ton's accounts of himself were meagre in
the extreme : in fact, I can remember
but one item. Five years after his grad-
uation, he reported his marriage to a girl
whose name I recognized as one I often
saw in the " society columns " of the
New York newspapers. That was quite
as it should be, and I smiled at this con-
firmation of the prevision I had had in
17G
The Shadow.
college days of his worldly success. Ob-
viously, the butterfly was still as gorgeous
as ever.
More than fifteen years went by before
I strayed from my country solitudes ;
then I went to New York for a brief
holiday, and at once sought out Barring-
ton. When I saw him I was shocked.
Although but thirty-seven, his hair was
not only thin, but quite gray. That he
should be stout and florid was perhaps no
more than I should have expected, but
his flesh and his color suggested drink
rather than health, and his face had a
strained, nervous look, quite at variance
with the air of careless good humor
which it had worn in college days. The
familiar splendor of garb was there, but
it accented, rather than concealed, his
misery and ill health. I wondered if he
were engaged in any dangerous specula-
tion.
His smile, as I marked with much re-
lief when he greeted me, had, at any rate,
lost none of its old charm. He explained
that his wife had gone South for the
winter for the benefit of her health, and
that he was leading what, with an ob-
vious attempt at gayety, he was pleased
to call a merry bachelor existence. We
dined at one of his clubs, — he knew, no
man better, how to order a dinner, —
went to the theatre, and then wandered
again to the club for a late supper and a
chance to talk over old times. As the
evening passed I could not help studying
him. On the street, his eyes, traveling
constantly from right to left, studied the
crowds as if there were some one whom
he expected, yet dreaded, to meet, and
he showed a certain distinct if very slight
nervous shrinking as we turned corners
or approached his places of habitual re-
sort. I gave up the idea of risky specu-
lation. His worry was of a different
kind : he acted like a man afraid.
As was natural, it was over our late
supper that we grew confidential. See-
ing that the old intimacy still had its
rights, I ventured to speak of his altered
appearance, and to ask him what was the
trouble.
He looked up in unaffected surprise.
" What," he said, " is it possible you do
not know ? In New York I 'in a marked
man. Every one knows my history. How
does it happen that " —
" But you forget my backwoods exist-
ence," I interrupted him. " You are
the first of the fellows whom I have seen
since we graduated."
Then he told me his history. But
before I repeat it I want to mention a
fact which, as it gradually grew plain to
me, increased a thousandfold the pitiful-
ness of his tale. The man actually en-
joyed telling the tragedy of his life. I
have mentioned his literary gift : he used
it to deepen the contrasts, to heighten
the effects. I saw that, by a quality in
human nature easy enough to understand,
he had grown to prize his calamity for
the distinction it gave his life. I divined
that it was not only a glory, but that it
was also — as, for example, in the matter
of his drinking — a never-failing excuse.
My classmates, at any rate, will under-
stand that, if I make this comment on
my friend, it is because he and his wife
are dead, and no one remains who might
be pained by it. Were this not so, in-
deed, I should not tell any of his story.
" I was only a year or so out of
college," he began, " when I met Elea-
nor. She was not exactly in my social
set. She was an orphan, alone in New
York, without friends. She had money,
— plenty of money ; but she lived a life
which I fancy is not uncommon in New
York. There must be many solitary
women of means, the last surviving
members of good families, who come to
the city to escape the dullness of country
life. Too proud to make the acquain-
tances that offer, and unable to know the
people whom they would naturally choose
to meet, they lead lives of practical soli-
tude. An aunt lived with Eleanor and
played respectability. I think that among
ordinary people this aunt would have
The Shadow.
177
seemed a woman of some force of char-
acter, yet Eleanor ruled her absolutely.
Eleanor was quiet in manner, but she
always had her way. The two women,
domiciled in an apartment in a good quar-
ter of the town, found their amusement
in the streets and in the shops. They
shopped a great deal, they went to con-
certs and to the theatre, but they had no
social life.
" A classmate of ours who had known
Eleanor in other days wrote and asked
me to call upon her. We all get such
letters : we call once, we find some pro-
vincial and uninteresting little girl, and
— well, the most of us never call again.
Such a girl I expected to find when
I made my first call, and I went with-
out enthusiasm, — from a sense of duty.
What I found was a girl of twenty, of
somewhat shy and sullen manner, to be
sure, but surprisingly beautiful, and far
from dull. Her manner I put down at
once to social inexperience ; I found
myself pitying her lonely life, and, in
short, I fell in love with her. Not ten-
tatively, self-indulgently, as a man often
does with lonely and pretty girls who
are not quite — well, you understand
what I mean ; but deeply, absorbingly,
without reserve. I burned all my bridges ;
we became engaged.
" Then I began to find out what sort
of a woman I had promised to marry.
You are an old friend ; I may tell you
things I might not tell to every one. She
was jealous and exacting beyond belief.
I do not mean that she was jealous of
other women only, — although her re-
cluse life had made her suspicious of
what she called my fashionable women
friends, — but of anything and every-
thing which kept me away from her,
even for a moment. She was jealous
of the men I knew, of my clubs, of my
business, of my books, of my very
thoughts. Whenever I saw her, I was
met with questions — questions — ques-
tions — adroit, persistent, suspicious —
which searched out everything, which
VOL. xcni. — NO. 556. 12
turned my soul inside out for her terrible
inspection. To this jealousy I had to
sacrifice my friends, — women first, then
men. My man had to go ; she did not
trust him. To please her, I destroyed
photographs that I cared for, until none
but her own was to be found in my
rooms. Finally, she made me sell my
dog; think of it, my dog! I lavished
upon it too much affection. Can you
imagine it ? — she was jealous, actual-
ly jealous of the poor beast. Then my
letters, — she read every one of them,
and each was the subject of irritating
cross-examination. And woe to me if I
contradicted myself. She had a memory
for what interested her that was like a
burr : facts clung to it forever. If what
I said to-day varied by a hair's breadth
from what I had said a week, or a month,
or even a year before, the discrepancy
was at once detected, and had to be ex-
plained on the spot, — minutely, compre-
hensively explained and justified.
" And she had the mania of control.
Where she loved, she wished to rule.
She insisted upon dictating what I should
do, where I should go, what I should eat,
what I should wear, what I should spend.
The complaint seems petty, but I assure
you nothing can be more exasperating,
more humiliating, than this tyranny of
a loving woman.
"Why did I not rebel? Man, this
woman had a will like steel, and a pride
in ruling that would not be thwarted.
You might murder her — if you dared ;
but while she lived, you obeyed. And
I have shown you but one side of the
shield. She was not merely beautiful,
— she was fascinating. There are wo-
men whom if you have once kissed, you
will go through any humiliation, any loss
of self-respect, if only you may come to
kiss them again. Eleanor was such a
woman. Besides, I did rebel — in a
fashion. Dreading the ordeal through
which I always had to pass at the begin-
ning of our interviews, I dared now and
then to give myself a holiday. But
178
The Shadow.
when I returned to her, I paid heavily for
my stolen day of liberty. Never losing
control of herself, she drove me to fury
by the most humiliating questions, by
making me satisfy the most cruelly in-
jurious suspicions. These scenes left
me stricken with shame both for myself
and for her, left me stripped bare of
self-respect.
"These are things which a man does
not usually tell ; but I want you to un-
derstand why I left her, — jilted her,
broke my vows. Flesh and blood could
not stand her exactions, and the prospect
of a lifetime with her became a thing to
drive one insane. There came a time
when it seemed to me that if I saw her
any more, I should kill her — or myself.
Yet, for a time, I continued to endure all
her injuries, her cool insults. It seems
incredible, and I hardly know how to
explain, — to find the words. She was
proud, imperious, passionate, feline, — all
suspicion and jealousy one instant, all
caresses and affection the next. She had
infinite surprises, she was infinitely in-
teresting. In going to her, I knew only
that I should be intensely happy, or in-
tensely miserable, or both. Do you won-
der that she owned me morally, physical-
ly ; that I was her slave, her plaything !
Some of the old Italian women must have
been like her.
" Was she of foreign blood ? Not at
all ! She was a Yankee, the daughter
of a man of rare force of character, I
believe, whose mills created the prosper-
ous town from which she came. You
have read Miss Wilkins's new novel
Pembroke, perhaps. It 's a horrible
story of the force of perverted wills, but
it has helped me to understand Eleanor.
" But at last I summoned every bit
of moral strength I had and broke from
her. I cannot make you understand
what the struggle cost me, so strong
was the desire which now and again
came over me to return to my bond-
age. But I did not go to her. I refused
to see her. I refused to answer her let-
ters, though they revealed to me a depth
of passion I had not guessed before.
Finally, I refused — partly through fear
of the emotion they caused me — even to
read them. I returned them all — un-
opened. Then she sent me telegrams.
As I could not, of course, guess from
whom these might be, I had to open
them. They were — unbelievable !
" Finally, they stopped. For a while
I breathed more easily. Little by little
I gained — so I thought — an assured
self-control. Only one thing spoiled my
pleasure in my recovered freedom, — I
knew that she still loved me even more
deeply, perhaps, than I had loved her. I
knew she never would, never could love
again. I knew how much against her
were the circumstances of her lonely life.
I knew how — without friends, without so-
cial distractions — she would have every
opportunity to brood morbidly over my
desertion. I knew how deep and cruel
would continue to be her despair, how
bitter and fierce would be her resentment
of the insult I had given to her pride.
I knew — and the burden was heavy —
that I had ruined a life.
" Well, the weeks went by: these pain-
ful impressions lost something of their
sharpness. I began again the inter-
rupted round of my usual social routine.
Calls, dinners, dances, the play, and the
opera became again a part of my life.
I thought only occasionally of the deso-
late woman going about her apartments,
too proud, as I imagined, to seek the
one source of possible sympathy, — the
old aunt. One night I had been with
a theatre party to the play. It was
a winter evening, bitterly cold, with a
wind that cut like a knife. When we
left the theatre we were all talking and
laughing, and I had stepped forward
to help one of the women — a pretty
girl, radiant at the moment with pleasure
— into one of the waiting carriages,
when a familiar perfume made another
woman rush back into my memory, and
filled me with the most disturbing, the
The Shadow.
179
most poignant emotion. I turned in-
stinctively. Dressed in black, thin, pale,
her resolutely compressed lips blue with
cold, her eyelids with their dark lashes
cast down, there at my elbow stood
Eleanor. She did not look at me, she
did not speak, she did not move. She
simply stood there in the cutting wind,
a living reproach. And there she re-
mained until all of us had entered the
carriages and been driven away. My
wonder as to what accident brought her
there at that hour, and in that garb, did
not prevent the spectacle of her desolate
and pathetic figure from striking deep
home to my conscience. It made me
realize the depth of her misery, and for
that misery I, and I alone, was responsi-
ble. Only by recalling with all possible
vividness the somewhat blunted memory
of her jealous exactions could I keep
myself from going to her at once. For
that evening all power even to appear
cheerful went from me.
" More surprises followed. The next
evening when I went to the club for
dinner, she stood on the curbstone, in
the same black gown, with the same
pallor, the same controlled quiet, the
same downcast eyes. Oppressed by the
thoughts and emotions which these un-
expected meetings evoked, I went that
night again to the theatre, on the chance
of finding there some slight self-f orgetf ul-
ness. She stood by the door as I passed
in, she was standing on the curb when I
came out. The next morning when I
went down town to my office, she was
there, — a black, accusing figure against
one of the white pillars that upheld the
portico of the great building. And so it
was for a week, a month. Everywhere
I went, there she was patiently waiting
on the sidewalk near where I must pass,
— in rain, in shine, in cold, in snow, —
always in black, always silent and mo-
tionless, like a statue with downcast eyes.
I soon saw that these meetings were not
accidental : they were planned. I thought
I divined. I had left her no way to win
back her happiness except by this dumb,
pathetic appeal."
Harrington paused and wet his dry
lips from the glass of whiskey and water
which stood by his hand on the table.
He had been drinking steadily all the
evening, but the liquor seemed to have
no other effect than to flush his cheeks,
and to brighten the lustre of his restless,
fear-struck eyes.
"You can imagine," he continued,
" how this would affect a man. Her ap-
pearance so moved me, so filled me with
pity, that all I recalled was the charm,
the affection of her good moments. And
bear in mind her beauty, her seductive-
ness, her strong will, which I felt upon
me even through her always downcast
lids. It was like magnetism. Remem-
ber, I had been under her powerful spell
for months, — and to the last degree of
possible humiliation. Remember that I
had the habit of yielding to her. Habit,
desire, pity, remorse for the wrong I
had done her were the powerful enemies
I had to fight. For a time, wherever I
saw her, my face turned white, my knees
-were like broken reeds ; I seemed to suffo-
cate ; I had an almost irresistible impulse
to surrender. Then came a period when
I was visited with an even more over-
whelming emotion. It took the form of
a strange anger and terror, a mastering
desire to escape or to resist ! Is it strange
that in those few moments when I saw
the situation sanely, — how utterly im-
possible it was that I should ever return
to her, — I was afraid of her, doubly
afraid of myself?
" Then came a new trouble, — petty,
but real. My friends began to notice.
No one asked questions, but veiled allu-
sions were made, adroitly managed op-
portunities were offered me to explain.
Women whom I was with grew silent
when we passed a certain black figure,
and cast discreet sidelong glances full of
inquiry. Men sauntered, as if acciden-
tally, to the club windows and gazed.
Sudden hushes fell among people as I
180
The Shadow.
approached. Some — and among them
were the best women I knew — grew
cool in their demeanor. I received fewer
invitations.
"The mere spectacle of her had
hitherto so moved me, so preoccupied
my thoughts, that I had never questioned
the accuracy of my first guess as to her
motive in so showing herself to me. But
in the third month little by little came
doubt. In all that troubled period, I
had given myself courage by saying to
myself that she would see that this last
appeal was, like all the others, quite vain
and would pursue me no longer. But
she had never let me see her eyes, which
might have revealed to me something
of her thoughts. Now, I had certainly
proved my firmness, yet she showed not
the slightest sign of discouragement.
Perhaps, I said to myself, passion has so
wrought in her that she must see me, and
that sight of me is her sole object. Then,
once or twice, it came into my unwilling
mind that her motive might be revenge,
that she sought to cause me misery rather
than to allay her own. That thought I
dismissed. It was unworthy.
" As another slow month went by,
other questions began to form themselves
in my mind. How long did she intend
to continue this strange appeal, — if it
were one ; this senseless persecution, —
if it were that ? And whence did she
obtain so close a knowledge of my move-
ments ? As to that, I began to test her
powers, — or, rather, it was with a blind
wish to avoid her that I began to change
my hour of arriving at my office, to dine
at unusual hours at clubs I did not or-
dinarily frequent, or at obscure restau-
rants. But this I soon found out : change
my ways as I would, I could not long
avoid her. Before the day was over, some-
where, early or late, I saw her. The
nervous dread of seeing that pale face
was every moment with me. I found
myself asking, ' Will it be on the steps
of my office ? On the curbstone by this
restaurant ? Will I meet her as I turn
this corner ? ' Dread of her became an
acute mental torture impossible to de-
scribe.
" I became wretchedly nervous, unfit
for work, unfit for pleasure. Once I
stayed for two days in my rooms without
stirring from them ; but on the second,
chancing to look from my window, I saw
her there in the street before my door.
There was no escape for me even in cow-
ardly retreat. I hope you can understand
why, as the months passed, I found this
strange, silent battle wearing me out,
slowly killing me. I hope you will un-
derstand how the idea of retreat, escape,
hiding, — no matter how cowardly, —
grew more and more attractive. Pride
struggled hard, self-respect said no ; all
my manhood revolted ; nevertheless, one
day — it was now early June — I threw
some things into a bag and left for Bar
Harbor. There, for one blessed day and
night, I was a free man, walking the
earth without dread. On leaving my
hotel on the second day, there by the
door, doubly conspicuous in that little
town, was the silent, black-robed figure
I had so learned to dread.
" I took the next train back to New
York. I said to myself, I will stay in
the city the entire summer ; she cannot
endure the heat. But she did. Then
— for I was utterly unnerved and not my-
self — I did an unmanly thing : I went
to the police. I asked to be protected
from the persecution of a woman.
" ' What does she do ? ' asked the high
official to whom I had applied.
" ' Nothing,' I was forced to answer,
feeling how like an imbecile it was to
say so. I tried to explain, and I saw by
his look that he thought me demented.
That a woman stood on the sidewalk,
without so much as looking at me as I
went by, did not seem to him serious
persecution. The man had no imagi-
nation ! He did not see, and I could
not make him understand, the exquisite
cruelty.
" Finally he said, ' I am sorry, Mr.
The Shadow.
181
Barrington, but I can do nothing. She
has the same right to the use of the streets
that you have. If she should accost
you, or make herself disagreeable in any
way, of course — But until she commits
some overt act I cannot interfere. Or,
hold on ; I could instruct policemen to
tell her to move on if she stays too long
in one place ; but you say she 's a re-
spectable woman ? — and has means ?
There might be a difficulty. I think
we 'd better not move in the matter.
Come, sir, you 're worked up over no-
thing. Go along quietly, pay no atten-
tion to her ; she '11 soon tire of that
amusement. What can she get by it,
after all ? '
" ' Accost you,' — ' commits some
overt act,' — you can guess how these
stale bits of the police vocabulary jarred
on me. You can see how significant they
were of a vulgar police interpretation of
the facts. And then the question, ' What
can she get by it ? ' It measured the
comprehension of human nature which
is given to the police. The man had no
conception of anything more subtle than
blackmail. I went away utterly dis-
heartened.
" I went to my rooms and thought.
I tried to divine her plan, her object.
I could make nothing of the mystery.
Broken as I was, I thought again of
flight, of Europe. But I had yielded to
cowardice once — and again ; I would
yield no more. I had unquestionably
done the woman an irreparable wrong,
and I would stay and face the punish-
ment like a man. And, besides, flight to
Europe, or anywhere, was vain. She had
followed me to Bar Harbor ; she could
follow me anywhere. She had money
enough, and I well knew she did not
lack determination.
" Until winter returned, I kept my
resolve to suffer in silence. Then
again I felt the temptation to escape —
by any means. With I hardly know
what hope, I employed a private detec-
tive to find out what he could. Little
enough he told me, — only that certain
associates of his in the trade were hired
by her to shadow me, and were well
paid, and that they knew nothing of her
motives. Thus I found out how she
knew so well where to place herself
where I must pass. Thus I was enabled
to see with terrible clearness the lengths
to which she was willing to go !
" Next, I consulted a lawyer. But all
that he could suggest was an inquiry into
her sanity. He thought that such an in-
quiry might result in her confinement in
an asylum. But, much as I desired to es-
cape, I had at least strength enough not
to resort to that cruel expedient. If she
was insane, — and I for one did not
believe she was, — clearly it was I who
had made her so. My hands were tied.
" Probably her detectives reported to
her these proceedings. At any rate, when
I next saw her, I detected for the first
time a difference in her expression, — so
slight, indeed, that I am not sure to this
day that it did not exist solely in my im-
agination, morbidly active after a year of
mental suffering. I had been making
a call, — for, in spite of everything, I
forced myself to lead my usual life, — and
came down the steps of my friend's house
late in the afternoon of a winter day.
She stood under a gaslight, and as I
passed her, I thought I detected in her
face — I know I detected in her face —
the subtlest look, a mere shadow of irony.
You may guess I knew this face well.
How could the minutest change escape
me ?
" The new expression dwelt in my
memory, and seemed to suggest an ex-
planation. Of course I inferred at once
that she knew I had had recourse to detec-
tives and to lawyers, but there seemed to
be more in her look than that. I racked
my mind with that intense effort which
is common to us all when we are trying
to recall anything which we greatly wish
to remember, and which is, as we say, on
the tip of our tongue. I seemed as near
to the meaning of her expression as that.
182
The Shadow.
But I could not catch the whole of its
deep significance.
" That night I awoke in a cold sweat,
starting up in bed as if with nightmare,
my heart beating as if with uncontrol-
lable terror. The scales had dropped
from my eyes — I knew !
" She was not like the police ; she did
have imagination! And what an im-
agination it was that could conceive the
plan which I had at last divined ! She
knew the danger of the ' overt act,' and
indeed she would despise anything so
clumsy. She had the courage and the
will power to do anything, even murder,
— of the long-planned, deliberate kind,
which shows will. No sudden assault,
nothing which might cause my death,
such as might content a weak-willed
woman, could be adequate to her ideal
of revenge as it was now suddenly re-
vealed to me. She wanted no scene, no
physical attack which the police could
stop, and which could terminate only in
the vulgarity of the police court. She
wished to subject me to a torture that
was insidious and slow, against which I
could make no protest, that would in-
crease rather than diminish as time went
on, that would be unending. Such tor-
ture as that must transcend the physical,
it must be mental. Seeking such an
end, she had imagination enough to con-
ceive this plan of becoming my shadow,
she had the strength of will — and a pro-
digious strength was required — to carry
it out. But the horror lay in this, —
her plan, to be perfect, must include the
intention of being my shadow as long as
I lived !
" If I well knew her unconquerable
will, I knew, also, her devouring pride.
Do what I would, she would rule my
life in spite of me. Her love I might
reject ; but her pride, at least, I should be
made to gratify. And to this passion, and
to that of revenge, and to her distorted
love, she would subordinate her whole
life, — all her strength, all her fortune,
all her prospects of happiness. No dif-
ficulty would daunt her, no discourage-
ment reach her, no ill health weaken
her. I quailed before the vision.
" For a moment, — but believe me
only for a moment, — as I gazed ahead
into the years and saw this life, — one
the most stolid could not endure unmoved,
— I thought of suicide. Then I said no :
I will stay and fight. She shall never
know — so far as I can help it — that I
suffer from her persecution, nor will I
again attempt to interfere. Her only
punishment shall be to think her revenge
a failure. I will try to make her think,
hereafter, that I mind her no more than
I do any casual passer-by, than a lamp-
post, or a hydrant.
" This resolution calmed me, and I
slept again. I awoke in the morning
not so much fatigued. For in a way the
full revelation of her purpose had freed
me of one source of weakness. Pity for
the woman vanished ; intense aversion
took its place. For a while thereafter
I think I actually enjoyed the sight of
her miserable face.
" Another year went by. My moods
during this time alternated between ab-
ject dread and a certain savage joy as I
met her. For I believed that to her I
showed no sign of suffering. Of course
my history gradually became known to
my friends, and as it did so I observed
a certain shifting of sympathy from her
to me. I had had none while the affair
remained a mystery. Now, people be-
gan to think I was being excessively pun-
ished. She became known as ' Barring-
ton's ghost,' and the slur in the name
was for her, not for me. All this gave
me courage. I thought with joy that I
should really, in time, become wholly in-
different. I might, perhaps, even enjoy a
certain happiness.
" Now, if a man is in misery, there is
always some woman who will love him,
and her love will be measured not by
his deserts, but by his suffering. I met
such a woman, — a girl whose pure
beauty, whose exquisite goodness, whose
The Shadow.
183
great courage seemed to make a bright-
ness round about her. I loved her, and
I dared to tell her so. She knew, I
said, what shadow haunted me : could
she, in spite of that, dare to marry me ?
' When this unhappy woman,' she an-
swered, 'sees you married, happy, in-
different, surely she will know she is
defeated and will cease to trouble you.'
Although I knew I should see my shadow
when I left the house that night, I allowed
myself to believe her. Why not ? I
knew my recent indifference had been
manifest ; I knew she knew her revenge
was failing. Would not such a new proof
as my marriage show her that I was se-
cure against her ? As a matter of fact,
I had put a new weapon into her hands.
" But, full of these hopes, I married.
The Shadow was present when we left
the church ; the Shadow, in her black
gown and with her white face, stood a
little apart from the crowd in the rail-
way station when we returned from our
wedding trip. I afterwards learned
that illness alone had prevented her fol-
lowing where we went. She never left
us after our return. At first my wife
never seemed to notice, she never com-
plained, she never even mentioned the
Shadow; she lived her life with a gay
courage ; but when the Shadow stood
with us by the grave of our baby, born
only to die — Well, I think I said my
wife has gone South for the winter ?
The reason ? She is a complete nervous
wreck, — health, beauty, youth, all gone !
" Did I never make any appeal to
that woman? Once. When, after the
death of our child, I saw that my wife
grew afraid, when I saw that her health
began to fail, I did try. I went to her
house, but I could not gain admission.
I wrote, but without result. Then, much
as I dreaded a scene in the streets, I de-
termined to speak to her. That even-
ing I went to a political dinner. At its
close I saw her, and, for the first time in
six years, I spoke to her. I begged her
to let me say a few words. She turned,
and by a gesture permitted me to walk
up the street at her side. For a block,
while men who knew the story stared in
wonder, I poured forth remonstrance,
denunciation, entreaty. Through it all,
her even pace never changed, her cold
face never altered, she spoke no word,
made no gesture of assent or of dissent.
At the end of the block was her carriage.
Into this she stepped, and left me —
without a word. She must enjoy the
memory of that hour !
" Come," added Barrington, breaking
off abruptly. " I 've finished my story.
It's late. We must go. For fourteen
years I 've endured this misery. Don't
say anything — I know," and then, half
under his breath, he added, " Poor Elea-
nor ! her beauty is quite gone, too."
Out of doors, a drizzling rain was fall-
ing. The reflected light of the street
lamps shimmered on the damp pave-
ments. It was two o'clock in the morn-
ing ; the strange odor of streets on a
warm wet night filled the air ; it was
very still. Then, suddenly, the roar of
an elevated train on Sixth Avenue,
a block away, broke the silence. We
turned down the street, and there, stand-
ing on the edge of the sidewalk, was
an apparition at which I stared with
instinctive, certain recognition. The wo-
man was in black ; she was very pale ;
her eyes were feverish and had deep
shadows under them ; her cheeks were
hollow. As Barrington had said, her
beauty had gone in these fourteen years,
but her unconquerable will had not gone.
A glance satisfied me of that. She was
his fate, and could not leave him. She
did not speak or move, but, as we passed,
the expression of her eyes as she re-
garded Barrington — for she raised her
eyes the second he had passed — was
one I shall never forget. Then, turning,
I saw her beckon to a waiting carriage.
This she entered, and was driven rapid-
ly away, the wet top of the vehicle flash-
ing as it passed under successive electric
lights.
Charles Miner Thompson.
184
English and American Cousins.
PART OF A MAN'S LIFE.
" The uttered part of a man's life, let us always repeat, bears to the unuttered, unconscious
part a small unknown proportion. He himself never knows it, much less do others." — Carlyle's
Essay on Scott.
ENGLISH AND AMERICAN COUSINS.
I HEARD on board ship, a few years
ago, a discussion as to the comparative
number of Americans visiting England
and of Englishmen visiting America.
None rated the proportion of the for-
mer class as less than ten to one ; but
the most experienced traveler among us
laughed at this low estimate, and declared
that five hundred to one would be much
nearer. Be the difference less or more,
it shows the utterly unequal ground on
which the two national bodies meet, as to
mutual acquaintance. Traveling on the
Continent of Europe, soon after, with a
party of young Americans, I was witness
of their dismay at being assailed from
time to time by friendly English fellow
travelers with such questions as these :
" Is it not very lonely in America ? Are
there any singing birds there ? Any
wild flowers ? Any bishops ? Are there
booths in the streets of New York ? Do
people read English books there ? Have
they heard of Ruskin ; and how ? " These
were from the rank and file of question-
ers, while a very cultivated clergyman
lost caste somewhat with our young peo-
ple by asking confidently, "Are Harvard
and Yale both in Boston ? " a question
which seemed to them as hopelessly be-
nighted as the remark of a lady, just
returned from the wonders of the New
World, who had been impressed, like all
visitors, with the novelties offered in the
way of food at the Baltimore dinner-
tables, but still sighed with regret at hav-
ing been obliged to come away without
eating " a canvas-backed clam."
One needs to know but little of large
families of collateral kindred to recog-
nize that the nearer the cousinship, the
closer the criticism. Theodore Hook
profanely declares the phrase "a friend
that sticketh closer than a brother" to
designate a cousin, and Lord Bacon
comes near enough to the same thought
to point out that we are bidden by the
highest authority to forgive our enemies,
but are nowhere bidden to forgive our
friends. It may be wise, therefore, for
Americans to draw their compliments,
not from their own newspapers, but from
the verdicts of such English critics as
Lord Lyons, who, as recorded in the
delightful Letters from a Diplomat's
Diavy, declared on his return from a
long residence in Washington that he
" had never yet met a stupid American
woman," or Mr. Froude, who, during his
voyage around the world, records, "Let
me say that nowhere in America have I
met with vulgarity in its proper sense."
These two compliments are undoubtedly
so sweeping that perhaps no American
citizen would think it quite safe to ap-
ply them to the people who live in the
adjoining street : but they are at least
worth a thousand vague newspaper libels.
Even Matthew Arnold, who certainly
cannot be said to have loved America
much, or to have known much about it, —
for what can a man be said to know
about America who describes a Virginia
mob as fortifying its courage with fish
balls and ice water ? 1 — was led, while
making a comparison with those whom
he had left at home, to say, "Our [Eng-
lish] countrymen, with a thousand good
qualities, are really, perhaps, a good deal
wanting in lucidity and flexibility."
In the same way, Americans might
1 The Nineteenth Century, May, 1887, p. 317.
English and American Cousins.
185
borrow their criticisms on England from
those writing in that country. Tims,
Mr. H. G. Wells, a novelist and scien-
tist in one, but not himself a university
man, writes in the Fortnightly Review
of " the ordinary Oxford, Cambridge, or
London B. A. : " " He has a useless
smattering of Greek ; he cannot read
Latin with any comfort, much less write
or speak that tongue ; he knows a few
unedifying facts round and about the
classical literature ; he cannot speak or
read French with any comfort ; he has
an imperfect knowledge of the English
language, insufficient to write it clearly,
and none of German ; he has a queer,
old-fashioned, and quite useless know-
ledge of certain rudimentary sections of
mathematics, and an odd little bite out
of history. He knows practically nothing
of the world of thought embodied in
English literature, and absolutely no-
thing of contemporary thought ; he is
totally ignorant of modern political or
social science. If he knows anything of
evolutionary science and heredity it is
probably matter picked up in a casual
way from the magazines, and art is a
sealed book to him."
And lest it be said that Mr. Wells,
with all his knowledge and brilliancy, is
not himself a graduate of any English
university, it is fair to cite the opinion
of Mr. Rudolph C. Lehmann (Trinity
College, Cambridge, M. A.), who, after
spending much time in America, where
he was familiar with our university life,
makes the following remark as to the
English and American schoolboy. He
writes : —
" There can be no comparison between
the two. The English public schoolboy
is one of the most profoundly ignorant
creatures on the face of the earth. Of
geography he knows only as much as
he may have gathered by collecting post-
age stamps. With English literature he
is not even on terms of distant polite-
ness. The style and composition of his
letters would make a housemaid smile,
and modern history, whether of his own
country or of the world in general, is a
sealed book to him."
No criticism from Americans is more
common than that as to the greater slow-
ness of the English mind as compared
with the American ; and Professor Tyn-
dall, when lecturing in this country, was
amused to find, as he told me, that
whereas in making experiments before
a London audience he had to repeat his
explanation three times, — once to make
his hearers comprehend what he was
about to do, then to show what he was
doing, and then to explain what he had
done, — he could after his first lecture
in America omit the final explanation,
and latterly the middle one as well. He
also told a story to the same effect about
an English manager of a " minstrel "
troupe, traveling in America, who was
accustomed to prolong his jokes by the
aid of two end men, each bringing out a
part of the joke, but who found with in-
dignation that every American audience
" caught on " without waiting for the
second end man. Yet the careful Ameri-
can observer soon finds that the standard
of quickness is to be determined in Eng-
land, as everywhere else, by the point
of view. People who go slowly on new
ground may turn out to be quick enough
when wholly at home with any particu-
lar line of thought.
How odious and complicated, for in-
stance, seems to an American observer
the computation of pounds, shillings, and
pence ! It seems strange that any na-
tion should consent for a day to employ
anything but a decimal currency ; yet
with what lightning rapidity does a Lon-
don bookkeeper make his computations !
Again, what a life of tedious formality
seems that of an English house servant ;
yet there was no slowness of intellect in
that footman, in an earl's family, who,
when his young lord fell over the banis-
ter, and his younger brother called to
ask if the elder boy was hurt, answered
promptly, " Killed, my lord ! " thus pro-
186
English and American Cousins.
moting the second son to the peerage
while the elder was falling over the ban-
ister. Even in the House of Commons,
the difference from an American delib-
erative body is found to vary accord-
ing to the point from which you look at
the discussion. The Englishman begins
with a curious air of hesitation, whereas
the American glides into his speech at
once ; but the difference is that the Eng-
lishman suddenly surprises you by com-
ing to his point with clearness and
decision, after which he amazes you yet
more by sitting down ; whereas the
American, after his first good hit, is
apt to seem intoxicated by his own suc-
cess, and feels bound to keep on indefi-
nitely, waiting for another. You are
left under the impression that an ideal
speech in any debating body would be
achieved by having an American to be-
gin it and an Englishman to end it.
Such plain facts as these show the
injustice of attributing to our cousins
any deliberate unfairness to ourselves,
and any conscious spirit of boastfulness.
We have only to read the newspapers to
see that party spirit rises, on the whole,
higher in England than here ; and cer-
tainly it is impossible for our cousins to
criticise us with more formidable frank-
ness than that which they apply to one
another. No man who ever lived was
more universally claimed as a typical
Englishman than Walter Savage Lan-
dor, and yet he wrote to Lady Blessing-
ton, "I would not live in London the
six winter months for £1000 a week.
No, not even with the privilege of hang-
ing a Tory on every lamp arm to the
right, and a Whig on every one to the
left, the whole extent of Piccadilly."
It must be remembered that the pro-
gress of events is in one respect, at least,
distinctly drawing the two nations into
closer connection. The advance of colo-
nization undoubtedly tends to democra-
tize England, while the same develop-
ment has the opposite effect in America.
Froude, in his travels, found the British
colonists, here and there, thinking that
Tennyson must have lost his wits to ac-
cept a peerage, and it is well remem-
bered that at least one of those who
came to the Queen's Jubilee to represent
different regions of the globe refused a
proffered knighthood on the ground that
his constituents would not endure it.
Anglo-Indian life, to be sure, shows no
such results, the conditions there be-
ing wholly different ; but I speak of the
self-governing colonies like Canada and
Australia ; and no one can have stayed
any time under the same roof with such
colonists in England, or paced the quar-
ter-deck with them on board ship, with-
out feeling them to be nearer to Ameri-
cans than to Englishmen in their general
mental attitude. Both would probably
be criticised by Englishmen as having
that combination, which a high educa-
tional authority once selected as the qual-
ity most frequently produced by the great
English public schools, — "a certain shy
bumptiousness."
Perhaps the best single key to the lin-
gering difference between English and
American temperament is to be found
in that precept brought to the front in
almost any text-book of morals or man-
ners one can open in England, bidding
each man to be faithful to that station
of life to which he is called. For the
American upon whom has always been
imposed the duty of creating for himself
his own station, this seems to explain all
the vast and unsatisfactory results which
seem to follow from the English method.
Is the calling equally providential and
even sacred, no matter from whom the
voice proceeds ? The first glance at the
history of the English peerage shows
us six peerages created to ennoble the
offspring of Charles II, who left no le-
gitimate child. Seven more were cre-
ated by William IV for his illegitimate
sons ; and his two illegitimate daughters
were the wives of peers. All these fam-
ilies are entitled to use the royal liv-
eries. Next to this lineage of degrada-
English and American Cousins.
187
tion come the peerages and other grades
of rank founded primarily on wealth, —
a process naturally beginning with the
lower grades. Hume tells us that James I
created the order of Baronets in 1611 by
selling two hundred of those titles for a
thousand pounds each. Mr. Pitt went so
far as to say that all men whose income
was rated at more than twelve thousand
pounds should be in the House of Lords.
How systematically this method has been
carried on to this day may be seen in the
following passage from the Spectator of
May 23, 1896 : —
" The Birthday Honors published on
May 20 hardly call for comment. Lord
Salisbury does not distribute them ec-
centrically, but according to the regular
custom, taking wealthy squires like Mr.
E. Heneage and Colonel Malcolm of Pol-
talloch for his peerages ; and giving bar-
onetcies to Mr. R. U. P. Fitzgerald, Mr.
W. O. Dalgleish, Mr. Lewis Mclver,
Mr. J. Verdin, and Mr. C. Cave, because
they are wealthy men who have done
service to the party."
If it be said that this process does
not vary essentially from the method by
which social rank is created in America,
the reply is plain enough. Grant that
the two forms of aristocracy have much
in common, both in their sense of power,
and in that comforting fact which Lady
Eastlake so finely pointed out, that both
of them often " return to the simplest
tastes ; they have everything that man
can make, and therefore they turn to
what only God can make." Nevertheless
there is this further difference, that, as
Mr. Howells has so well shown, though
the rich man may look down as distinctly
as the lord can, the poor man does not
equally look up. Note, too, that in the
next place, the prestige of the rich Ameri-
can vanishes with his wealth, and in case
he dies poor, his children inherit nothing ;
whereas inherited rank in England goes
by blood only, and is not impaired by
the fact that it passes afterwards into
the hands of a bankrupt or a scoundrel.
The same limitation applies to the riches
of the brain, which may also refuse to
be hereditary. One can hardly cast so
much as a glance at the United States
Senate in session, and then at the Eng-
lish House of Lords in session, without
recognizing the American elective body to
have a far more intellectual aspect than
the other assemblage ; or without further
observing that nine tenths of the visible
intellect in the British House is to be seen
in the faces and foreheads of the Bench
of Bishops, or the so-called Law Lords,
whose origin may have been of the hum-
blest. "Why noble Earls should be so
ugly," wrote one English observer of some
note in his day, " is a problem in na-
ture ; " but the question is not that of
mere beauty or ugliness ; it is of visible
mental power.
Even so far as a possible heredity
goes, it must be recognized that a repub-
lican life is what makes grandparents
most truly interesting. Free from the
technical whims of an organized peerage,
— such, for instance, as primogeniture, —
one is left free to trace for good or for
evil his inheritance from the various lines
of ancestry. Those lines may be drawn
with especial interest from public service
or social prominence ; from pursuits, or
education, or even wealth. Whittier's
Quaker inheritance was as important to
him as Longfellow's parentage of judges
and landed proprietors was to him. I
knew an American radical, who, on going
to England, paid some one at the Her-
alds' College to look up his ancestry.
Coming back to London some months
later, he found that the inquirer had
gone back no farther, as yet, than to
reach one of his name who was hanged
as a rebel under the Tudors. " Just as
I expected," said the American in de-
light ; " do not follow it any further. I
am perfectly satisfied."
Fifty years ago, so far as mere trav-
eling was concerned, the distinctions of
rank in the mother country did not in-
trude themselves on the American cousin.
188
English and American Cousins.
It was the frequent habit of traveling
Americans, visiting England for the first
time, to assume that their hosts would be
ungracious, and that they themselves
must necessarily wear a hedgehog suit.
As a matter of fact, however, even then,
the American traveler usually laid aside
his prickles on the second day, finding
that there was no use for them in those
small railway carriages. Traveling Eng-
lishmen of all conditions, at least on their
own soil, turned out quite as ready to
offer a railway guide, or a bit of advice,
as in this country. It is to be remem-
bered, moreover, that the whole system of
traveling habits in England — railways,
hotels, and all — has greatly expanded
and liberalized within that time. No
doubt much of the former American in-
justice was due to the example of Eng-
lishmen of the last generation in doing
injustice to one another. Horace Wai-
pole said that he should love his country
very much if it were not for his country-
men. " I hate Englishmen," said Keats,
"for they are the only men I know."
Heinrich Heine, that Parisian German,
said that he was firmly convinced that a
blaspheming Frenchman was regarded
with more favor by the Almighty than a
praying Englishman, and one might find,
even among Englishmen themselves, al-
most equally piquant self-reproaching.
On the other hand, the sense of truth-
fulness, of national rectitude, of a cer-
tain solid quality, comes over you like
a whiff of English air in the very tone
of voice of the first railway porter you
meet. I recall vividly, as a type of this
trait, a certain little English sergeant,
with hair as fiery as his uniform, whom
I met in an Irish post office in 1870. I
had landed at Cork the day before, on
my first trans-Atlantic trip, soon after
the civil war ; and having been lately
familiar with our own troops, felt a great
desire to see those of the mother coun-
try. Having readily obtained informa-
tion from him as to the barracks near
by, we carried the conversation a little
further. My new acquaintance seemed
pleased at hearing that I had taken a
modest part in the civil war, and rather
disappointed to find that I had been on
what he evidently regarded as the wrong
side. He told me in return that al-
though now a sergeant of the Guards,
he had previously served in another regi-
ment. Leaving him presently, I went
to purchase some stamps at the office,
where I was somewhat delayed by other
applicants, and also by a natural in-
experience in handling British money.
During this time I observed that my
friend of the brilliant coloring was lin-
gering and keeping his eye on me, as if
waiting for some further interview ; and
as I went toward the door he approached
me, and begged my pardon for say-
ing something more. " I told you, sir,"
he said, "that I was a sergeant of the
Guards, which is true. But I wish to ex-
plain that I was not originally a mem-
ber of that regiment, but was transferred
to it after the battle of the Alma, where I
was severely wounded. I give you my
word of honor, sir, that I am the very
shortest man in the corps ! " I could
only think of the phrase attributed to
the Duke of Wellington, " The Guard
dies, but never surrenders ! "
The name of the Guards suggests to
me a striking instance where an English
friend and distant kinsman of mine, then
in command of the Grenadier Guards,
found himself under the need of testing
very suddenly the essential manhood of
a body of Englishmen on the dangerous
verge of what seemed for the moment
an insurrection. It was on that well-re-
membered night when the London mob
tore down the fences of Hyde Park, to
be used either as bonfires or as barri-
cades, as the case might be. On that
perilous evening, this officer was dining
at a friend's house, all unconscious of
impending danger, when he received a
summons from the War Department,
telling him that his regiment was or-
dered out to deal with a mob. Hurrying
English and American Cousins.
189
back to his own house, and calling for his
man servant to saddle his horse, he found
that the man had gone by permission for
the evening, and had the key of the stable
in his pocket ; so that the officer, after
hastily donning his uniform, must pro-
ceed on foot to the Guards' Armory,
which lay on the other side of Hyde Park.
Walking hastily in that direction, he
came out unexpectedly at the very head-
quarters of the mob, where they were
piling up the fences. Already his uni-
form had been recognized, and angry
shouts began to rise. It must have
seemed for the moment to the mob that
the Lord had delivered their worst enemy
into their hands. There was but one thing
to be done. Making his way straight
toward the centre of action, he called to
a man mounted on the pile, the apparent
leader of the tumult, " I say, my good
fellow, my regiment has been called out
by Her Majesty's orders. Will you give
me a hand over this pile ? " The man
hesitated for an instant, and then said
with decision, " Boys, the gentleman is
right ! He is doing his duty, and we have
no quarrel with him. Lend a hand, and
help him over." This was promptly done,
with entire respect, and the officer, in his
brilliant uniform, went hastily on his way
amid three cheers from the mob, which
then returned to its work, to be completed
before he whom they had aided should
come back at the head of his regiment, and,
if needful, order them to be shot down.
Surely the most travel-worn American,
one would think, when recalling such
scenes, can never revisit London without
being reminded of the noble description
of that great capital in Milton's Areo-
pagitica, written in 1644 : " Behold now
this vast city, a city of refuge, the man-
sion house of liberty, encompassed and
surrounded with his protection ; the shop
of war hath not there more anvils and
hammers working, to fashion out the
plates and instruments of armed justice
in defence of beleaguered truth, than
there be pens and heads there sitting by
their studious lamps, musing, searching,
revolving new notions and ideas where-
with to present, as with their homage
and fealty, the approaching reformation ;
others as fast reading, trying all things,
assenting to the force of reason and con-
vincement. . . . Under these fantastic
terrors of sect and schism, we wrong the
earnest and jealous thirst after know-
ledge and understanding which God hath
stirred up in this city."
When it comes to the use of their com-
mon language, the English and American
cousins have no doubt those variations
which habitually mark kindred families,
even in adjacent houses ; and, as between
those families, there are always argu-
ments on both sides, and many dictiona-
ries and even lexicons need to be turned
over before coming to a decision. In
the same way, when a New England
farmer says, " I don't know nothin' about
it," we are apt to forget that this dou-
ble negative was a matter of course in
the Anglo-Saxon (see Hickes's Thesau-
rus), as it still is in the French ; and it
may be found abundantly in Chaucer and
in Shakespeare, as in Romeo and Ju-
liet (act iii, scene v), —
" a sudden day of joy,
That thou expect'st not nor I look'd not for."
In the same way, when our country
people say " learn me," instead of " teach
me," they have behind them the author-
ity of the English Bible, " learn me true
understanding," and also of Chaucer,
Spenser, and Shakespeare, the latter,
curiously enough, sometimes employing
both words in the same sentence, as in The
Tempest (act i, scene ii) where Cali-
ban says, —
" You taught me language ; . . .
. . . The red plague rid you
For learning me your language ! "
The French apprendre combines the
meaning of the two words in the same
way.
All the cousins must admit that such
phrases are everywhere better preserved
in rustic communities than elsewhere.
190
English and American Cousins.
Even in America, we get nearer the
Chaucerian and Shakespearean dialect in
the country than in the city. Old people
are also necessarily nearer to it than
the young, whatever the language. Thus
M. Pasquier, who died in France in 1615
at the age of eighty-seven, remembered
that in his youth the French word honnete
had still an s in it, as in the English " hon-
est," and complained that he lived to see
the s dropped and a circumflex accent
substituted. It is to be noted, also, that
in a new country all changes, when once
introduced, make their way much faster
than in an older one. We still see Eng-
lish critics laying the whole responsibil-
ity for the dropping of the u in " hon-
or," " favor," and the like, on Webster's
Dictionary, when it really originated in
England long before the publication of
that work. It is stated in The Gentle-
man's Magazine for 1803 (No. Ixxiii,
part i, p. 146) that there was at that time
in the library of St. John's College, Cam-
bridge, a copy of Middleton's Life of
Cicero printed with the omission of the u
in such words, — a volume in which some
pious student had taken the pains to re-
insert them all. It would, at that time,
have been thought an equal outrage to
drop the closing k from physick, musick,
publick, and the like, the only difference
being that the u has thus far held its own,
and the k has not. The English language
simply changes faster in America than
in England ; and in this respect, as in
some others, we are more like the French
in our qualities. Vaugelas, an old French
translator of Quintus Curtius, after de-
voting thirty years to the work, had to
correct the language and spelling of the
earlier part to make it conform to that
of the latter pages ; so that the critic
Voiture applied to his case the Latin epi-
gram of Martial on a barber who did his
work so slowly that the hair began to
grow again upon one half the face, while
he was shaving the other.
When we pass from the comparative
dialects of the English and American
cousins to their respective intonations, we
find that, as Mr. William Archer has
admirably pointed out in the Pall Mall
Magazine, there are so many whims and
inconsistencies to be counted up in each
family that it is hardly worth while to
strike the balance. In colloquial utter-
ance it is a curious fact that the nation
which uses the more even and uninflected
tone is the more impetuous and impulsive
of the two, namely, the American ; while
the Englishman, slower and more staid,
has yet a far more varied intonation.
The most patriotic American, after a
stay of some months in England, is struck
by a certain flatness and monotony in
the prevailing utterance of his fellow
countrymen, on the quarter-deck of the
returning steamer. Here, as in most
things, there is a middle ground, and the
two families are much less distinguish-
able in this respect than formerly. The
American nasality is also toned down,
and it is more and more common for two
English-speaking strangers to meet and
try in vain to guess the national origin
of each other. When it comes to the ac-
tual pronunciation, it is a curious fact to
notice, that special variations of speech
in the English lower class have ceased
to be accidental and unconscious, if they
ever were so, but are more deliberate and,
so to speak, premeditated, than those
of the corresponding class — so far as
there is such a class — in America. I
heard with interest, for the first time,
in a third-class railway carriage in Lon-
don an evidently conscientious and care-
ful mother impressing on her child as a
duty that extraordinary transformation
of the letter a into i or y, of which the
best manual is to be found in Mr. White-
ing's inexhaustible tale, No. 5 John
Street. His neighbors on that street
usually transformed " paper " into " pi-
per," " lady " into " lidy," and " always "
into " alwize." In my own case, when
a sudden shower came up, the little boy
called attention to it, in what would seem
to us a natural enough dialect, '' Mother,
English and American Cousins.
it 's rainin' ! " " You should n't say rain-
in'," said the anxious mother ; " you
should say rynin' ! " It brought home
to me a similar attempt, on the part of
an Irish- American orator, to correct Sen-
ator Lodge's habitual and very proper
pronunciation of the place of his summer
residence, Nahant. " Mr. Lodge of Na-
hant," said the orator, with a contemptu-
ous prolongation of the last two vowels.
He then paused for a sympathetic re-
sponse from a Cambridge audience, but
receiving none, he repeated, " Mr. Lodge
of Nahant ; that 's the way he calls it.
Common people call it N&hant."
The conclusive statement as to the
future relation of English and American
cousins may perhaps be found in that
quiet sentence in which Emerson's vol-
ume called English Traits sums up (in
1856) its whole contents : " It is no-
ticeable that England is beginning to
interest us a little less." Toward this
tends the whole discussion of that in
which the mother country differs from
her still formidable rival, France, on the
one side, and from her gigantic child, the
American Republic, on the other. As
against both of these, England still clings
to the toy of royalty and all which it im-
plies. Against countries where aspir-
ing intellect finds nothing too high for
it to aim at, there still remains in Eng-
land the absolute precedence of the House
of Lords. I knew a young American
girl, who, going to England under the
care of an ambassador's family, and
attending her first large dinner party,
selected, upon looking about her, as the
most interesting guest in the room, one
man of distinguished aspect, whom she
resolved to watch. When the guests
were ushered into the dining-hall accord-
ing to the laws of precedence, she found
herself at the very end of the brilliant
procession, as one of two untitled plebe-
ians, in company with the very man who
had interested her, and who proved to
be Samuel Rogers, the poet and patron
of art, and the recognized head of liter-
ary society in London. She always said
that she secured two things at that en-
tertainment, namely, the most delight-
ful companion that she ever had at a
dinner party, and, moreover, a lesson in
the outcome of mere hereditary rank that
would last a lifetime. Rogers's poems
are not now read so much as formerly,
but at that time the highest attention a
literary American visitor could receive
in London was to dine with him. He
was also one of the richest bankers in
that city, and was very possibly the only
person in the room who had won for him-
self a reputation outside of his own little
island ; but he was next to nobody in that
company, and the little American girl
was the nobody.
Max O'Rell points out that the French-
man who takes no notice of a duke will
turn to take a second look at a great
literary man or savant. No doubt the
English aristocracy, as is always the
case with aristocracies, often goes out of
its way to do honor to literature and art
in the form of courtesy or patronage ;
but this, too, has its limits. It is easy
enough for a literary man in England to
dine with a lord who shares his own
tastes ; it is only when he is asked to
dine with a stupid lord that the attention
can be counted as a social recognition.
Even in this case it may be in the hope
of finding the barbaric guest amusing ;
and it was said that the immediate cause
of the artist Haydon's suicide was his
despair at being hopelessly eclipsed in
polite society by Tom Thumb. If this is
true, what fatal instances of self-destruc-
tion may not have taken place among
American artists and authors who found
themselves equally outshone in the Eng-
lish fashionable life by Buffalo Bill !
But let us turn from these trifles and
go deeper. No American could possi-
bly have passed through England dur-
ing the anxious days of President Mc-
Kinley's final ordeal and death, without
being profoundly impressed with the in-
alienable tie between the two nations
192
Verses to Colonel Thomas Wentworth Higyinson.
whose cousinship never before was so
strikingly visible. I happened to be at
Exeter, a city as marked, perhaps, as any
in England for all that is non-American
in church and state. All through that
fatal Sunday the telegrams conveying the
latest returns were put out, ^from time to
time, at the windows of the office, and
all day long one might see groups or sin-
gle observers coming, going, and pausing
to inspect ; even children eagerly trans-
mitting the successive items of news from
one to another. There was no religious
service held in the city, from the most
conservative to the most liberal, where
there was not some reference made to
the incident. In all of these there was
reported — and as to three or four I can
personally testify — a fullness of feeling
such as touched the heart of every Ameri-
can. On the next morning, whole pages
of the country newspapers, usually so bar-
ren of American items, were crowded with
reports of Sunday services in various
towns and villages. Driving through the
country, in any direction, during those
sorrowful days, one saw mourning flags
here and there, on the streets, on public
buildings, and before private houses. In
London the very omnibus drivers some-
times carried them. We were constantly
told that no European sovereign's death
had ever brought forth so much testimo-
nial of grief, and we could well believe it.
No American who happened to be in
England during that experience can ever
again doubt the depth and reality of Eng-
lish and American cousinship.
Thomas Wentworth Higginson.
VERSES TO COLONEL THOMAS WENTWORTH HIGGINSON
ON HIS EIGHTIETH BIRTHDAY.
PREACHER of a liberal creed,
Pioneer in Freedom's cause;
Ever prompt to take the lead
In behalf of saner laws,
Still your speech persuasive flows
As the brooks of Helicon.
You have earned a fair repose,
Thomas Wentworth Higginson !
You have never stooped to feat
Taunt of opulence or place,
Smug convention's frosty sneer,
Fashion's elegant grimace.
In your youthful vision pure
Truth a constellation shone.
Truth is still your cynosure,
Thomas Wentworth Higginson.
Throbbing with indignant zeal,
Lawlessly you sought to save
From the law's relentless seal
Burns the fugitive, a slave.
Verses to Colonel Thomas Wentworth Higginson. 193
Your indictment came to naught,
For some flaw was hit upon.
Time is an enshrining court,
Thomas Wentworth Higginson.
Wounded where the bravest fell
To redeem your fellow men ;
Working by the double spell
Of your eloquence and pen ;
Now that eighty years are scored,
Busy souls may pause to con.
'T was the service of the Lord,
Thomas Wentworth Higginson.
You have printed many lines
To inspire an eager age.
Counsel wholesome as our pines,
Timely essays keen and sage.
Memories of " Oldport Days "
Which we love to dwell upon, ,
With your " Cheerful Yesterdays,"
Thomas Wentworth Higginson.
Eighty years are but a crown
When the soul is true and kind,
And sparse locks of grizzled brown
Grace a vigorous active mind.
Soldier, patriot, and seer,
Writer, scholar, gentleman,
To the native heart more dear
For the gauntlet which you ran
In pursuit of many a goal
Which the creeping world condemned ;
Aspiration kept your soul,
And you feared not to offend.
Lo ! amid your autumn leaves
What men scorned now truth appears,
And your dreams are bearing sheaves
In the harvest of your years.
Preacher of a liberal creed,
Pioneer in Freedom's cause ;
Ever prompt to take the lead
In behalf of saner laws,
Still your speech persuasive flows
As the brooks of Helicon.
You have earned a fair repose,
Thomas Wentworth Higginson !
Robert Grant.
VOL. xcni. — NO. 556. 13
194
Is Commercialism in Disgrace ?
IS COMMERCIALISM IN DISGRACE?
IT must be admitted that a certain
ignominy rests upon " Commercialism "
as that term is commonly used. It is not
merely that, in the recent months, we have
witnessed something like a national out-
burst of mingled indignation and cyni-
cism because the poker mask has been
torn from certain giddy schemes of the
" high finance." Such obloquy as exists
dates from days older than Christian-
ity. Neither Plato nor Cicero conceals
his scorn of the trader. So long as the
heroic energies of the race were given
to war, it was inevitable that some odi-
um should be associated with mercantile
pursuits. These obscure callings then
brought no splendor of social distinction.
They were honestly believed to be squal-
id occupations. Every enlarged privi-
lege of the trader had to be gained by
cunning, by bribes, or by slavish impor-
tunities. There is quite enough humili-
ating economic history in our own civil
war to make this clear. A man of sci-
ence in the employ of the Government
went to Mr. Lincoln, in 1863, to tell him
how the large contractors were debauch-
ing our politicians and fleecing the Gov-
ernment. Mr. Lincoln heard his story,
but at its end surprised the visitor by
saying, " Mr. , I know all that and
a good deal more, but to stop this thiev-
ing would stop the war."
Every gluttonous passion for gain had
so instantly allied itself with the desper-
ate practical needs to which war gives
rise, that to stop the looting was to im-
peril the work of the army in the field.
The financial orgies connected with mod-
ern wars in Russia, France, and England
are well known. Even of the German
war of 1870, a Berlin banker has said
that the secret history of supplying the
army at that time would, if allowed to
be published, shock the whole Father-
land. If this be true to-day, it is easy
to understand how business methods must
have suffered in ages that were prevail-
ingly military.
It is less clear why the reproach should
appear among the scholastic economists
who had come to disapprove of war and
to recognize the social service of trade.
Yet a world of proof is at hand that the
trader had a sorry task to account for
himself morally. The ethical censure
was severest against those whose main
occupation it was to take interest on
moneys, and it was long before usury
was distinguished from interest. In spite
of civil laws, as late as the fourteenth
century the church prohibited usury on
moral grounds. Aquinas condemns it as
against nature and all precepts of reli-
gion, while Dante in the Inferno has the
usurers in his low seventh circle of Hell.
One might charge interest to an enemy
as a means of punishing him, —
" If thou wilt lend this money, lend it not
As to thy friend, — for when did friendship
take
A breed of barren metal of his friend ?
But lend it rather to thine enemy."
If the military era be thought to char-
acterize race effort until the modern in-
dustrial regime fairly begins, this would
go far to account for these earlier disgraces
of money-getting as a primary occupation.
It is the soldier in Napoleon that taunts
England with being a nation of shopkeep-
ers. It was meant in derision, and was
taken in the polite world as an insult.
Even Ruskin delights to hold up the
soldier as a gallant figure, in comparison
with which the trader is but a shabby
creature.
Yet this conflict between military and
industrial ideals but partially explains
the aversion to commercialism. Other
hostilities have arisen which, in their
origin, are quite apart from this tradition
of war versus peace. Three terms are
Is Commercialism in Disgrace ?
195
now in current use : " industrialism,"
" capitalism," '• commercialism." While
a literature of vituperation has appeared
against capitalism and commercialism,
there is rarely a word of abuse for indus-
trialism, probably because it stands pop-
ularly for the quieter and better behaved
processes of wealth production. This
inoffensive term represents, however, the
principles applicable to industry as now
organized and carried on. Yet it goes
scot free, while capitalism and commer-
cialism take their scathing. As the one
term is taken at its best, the other two are
taken at their worst.
One could fill an encyclopaedia with
picturesque and vehement denunciation
of commercialism from the pulpit, from
men of letters, from social and political
reformers, and especially from the whole
world of art. We hear a great deal
about the commercializing of the church ;
the exclusion of the poor by the money
standard of high pew rents, and the un-
due influence there of rich men. From
political reformers we hear no less inces-
santly about the impudent disregard of
every civic decency, if only franchises
or legislative immunities are required.
It is against these dangers to our polit-
ical health and well-being that the moral
revolt culminates. Yet neck to neck in
this tilt against commercialism, every-
where may be found the artist. It is
the artist in Morris, in Zola, in Ibsen,
that flames out against " the sordidness
of our huckster age." In Carlyle, in
Raskin, in Tolstoi, one is uncertain
whether the anger springs first from
the moralist or first from the artist.
The moral reproach is directed largely
against the passion for gain when it be-
comes an end in itself. Once the am-
plest competence has been won, why, it is
asked, should the fever and the strain go
on until the victim has no other joy left
but this accumulating for its own sake ?
In one of his later essays Max Muller
maintained that this disease was under
our control. His remedy took the form
of an appeal, to those who had gained this
competence, to quit work, not merely for
their own sake, but to open the way for
younger men. There appears to be no
eagerness to take this counsel so long as
the " disease " is there. It is precisely
this unnatural stimulus to mass unneces-
sary gains which has brought against our
competitive system the most convincing
ethical reproach. Commercialism, in its
current bad sense, has come to stand for
all this abnormal overdoing, as well as
for the incidental frauds that may accom-
pany it.
It was Ruskin's opinion that we should
not become a civilized people until men
went into business to serve their fellows.
Men with genuine spiritual elevation go
into the church under the influence of
this motive. Why, asks Ruskin, should
we not take up business with the express
object of doing good ? I once heard this
view stated before a group of business
men of the better sort. It was taken
first as a sally of humor. When the
speaker grew serious about it, the audi-
ence still regarded it as food for merri-
ment. It was like telling a soldier that
he was in the army for the purpose of
forgiving his enemies. Men go to busi-
ness with the very distinct aim of mak-
ing money. Multitudes of them have
high and unselfish motives about the use
to which the money shall be put when
gained. First, and most general, is the
support and education of the family.
The affections which centre there are the
spring of much of the hardest work men
do in business. Nor is money ever used
to better purpose. Others, obviously in
considerable numbers, are moved by the
hope of enriching the community life
by gifts. For beauty, health, recreation,
educational opportunity, several hundred
millions have been given to our people
in the last generation.
To say that men go to business solely
for money conceals more truth than it
discloses. It is true that the first object
is not to do good, but to get money, and
196
7s Commercialism in Disgrace ?
it is this primary and engrossing aim
which brings it into conflict with those
who are striving first for other ideals.
An architect, if he have the serious pas-
sion of the artist, insists first upon the
fitness, symmetry, and beauty of his de-
sign. To say that he thinks first of
money is to say that he is not first an ar-
tist. To the business man who employs
the architect, the controlling aim is likely
to be the return upon his investment.
" Fitness " to him and to the designer
is not the same word. Symmetry and
beauty must take their chances. They
are subservient and secondary to other
purposes. There is no sphere of art,
science, politics, or religion in which this
conflict is not felt. So long as the money
motive acts on its own plane, it is with-
out offense ; but let it once invade the
field of other arts, conflict arises so far
as it essays to dominate there. It is
this attempted domination against which
all those who are loyal to other ideals
enter protest.
The very existence of the Arts and
Crafts Societies is owing to the rude
ascendency of commercialism in a sphere
where it should serve and not rule. Quan-
tity, and not quality, will be the busi-
ness aim ; specialization will separate the
designer from the craftsman, and every
art value will become accidental. The
heroic effort of these associations to keep
the designer and craftsman together, to
give the conditions and leisure for per-
fect workmanship, to safeguard the ut-
most freedom of the artistic impulse, is
a valiant attempt to keep the enemy at
bay. The more definite form which the
enemy takes in this special field is the
machine. It is the body, of which com-
mercialism may be called the soul.
The embittered diatribes of Ruskin
against this monster are now seen to be
whimsical in their extravagance. In its
place the machine, like commercialism, is
as much a part of civilization as a statue,
a symphony, or the Stones of Venice. It
is only when machinery is allowed to
enslave us, or is set to tasks for which its
automatic character forever unfits it, that
objection is raised. The artist must have
structure and raw material on which to
work. The imprint which the pliant
spirit of his genius leaves on this mate-
rial is art. Those who deserve the name
of artist fret and are jealous when the
machine is out of place. They feel, and
feel rightly, that, out of place, its results
are mischievous. In no sphere better
than that of the artist can one see that
the contest is not against the proper
service of the machine, or the business
spirit that works through it, but against
specific perversities traceable to man's
ignorance and greed. The artists are,
however, not alone in this crusade.
Three men of such splendid equipment
as John Stuart Mill, Professor F. A.
Lange, and Herbert Spencer would class
awkwardly as artists, yet each writes
himself down among the sharpest censors
of commercialism. Though the displea-
sure of the socialist is primarily against
capitalism, because the world's machin-
ery is so narrowly owned that it turns
interest, rent, and profits into the private
purse, rather than into the common trea-
sury, yet socialists never weary of de-
faming the mercantile spirit. To make
things for profit and gain, rather than for
use, is a sin they never allow us to forget.
We read, without surprise, in Belfort Bax:
" In the commercial relation, as such, the
moral relation is abolished. . . . Con-
science, which has its ground in social
union, can have no part nor lot with com-
merce which has its ground in anti-social
greed." No one, indeed, quite matches
the thorough-going socialist in damnatory
phrases. Yet if our social destinies ever
fall under collectivist control, trade and
commerce, with political management,
would still go on. They assure us that
capitalism would cease, as the mech-
anism of production — railways, banks,
mills, mines — slowly passes to public
ownership.
The formidable task that socialism
Is Commercialism in Disgrace ?
197
sets itself is to do the world's work direct-
ly by the community, without the help of
the individual money lender and profit
maker. The community, as communi-
ty, is to furnish the capital and the man-
agement, and is, therefore, to retain the
fruits of both. If only the community
(city and state) could do this effective-
ly, capitalism, as now understood, would
cease. Commercialism in some sense
must go on. The socialist's easy answer
to a hard question helps us in this inquiry.
He assures us that every fang of commer-
cialism would be drawn if it were once
freed from certain abuses. With this
the sturdiest individualist agrees, only
he would fix upon another order of abuses
as the chief source of danger. To him,
the first and supreme difficulty is neither
in the "incubus of the three rents," nor in
the private control of machinery. So far
as these are evil, they are secondary and
not primary. Thus, when Spencer, the
" High Priest of individualism," criti-
cises trade, he is of more help to us than
Mr. Bax.
It is Spencer who has made the great
plea of our time in favor of industrialism
as against the military spirit. He is the
doughtiest individualist in the arena, yet
in his Morals of Trade he writes : " On
all sides we have found the result of long
personal experience to be the conviction
that trade is essentially corrupt. . . .
To live in the commercial world it appears
necessary to adopt its ethical code : nei-
ther exceeding nor falling short of it, —
neither being less honest nor more hon-
est. Those who sink below its standard
are expelled ; while those who rise above
it are either pulled down to it or ruined.
As, in self-defense, the civilized man be-
comes savage among savages ; so, it
seems that, in self-defense, the scrupu-
lous trader is obliged to become as little
scrupulous as his competitors. It has
been said that the law of the animal crea-
tion is — Eat and be eaten ; and of our
trading community it may similarly be
said that its law is — Cheat or be cheated.
A system of keen competition, carried
on, as it is, without adequate moral re-
straint, is very much a system of com-
mercial cannibalism. Its alternatives
are — Use the same weapons as your
antagonists, or be conquered and de-
voured."
This essay was written nearly a half
century ago, when the position of a
tradesman in England was something
better than that of a lackey. No son
of the great Argyle yet sold tea, nor
had the scions of stately houses begun
to flock to city markets with the express
object of making money in trade. They
do not thus far take gayly to retailing
useful commodities, but they take al-
most greedily to various forms of money
lending ; though, in the hands of Jews,
this was thought by Christians, for cen-
turies, to be but a scurvy pursuit. This
knightly approval of the hitherto vulgar
has much to encourage us, though it may
not wholly rescue the higgling of the
market from its knaveries.
Of the tart comments of Lange and
Mill on commercial practices, it may be
said confidently that their own writings
show that they were dealing with the
abuses of trade, and not with its uses.
The cheating and the buccaneering con-
nected with trade sting Spencer into
indiscriminate protests that seem an im-
peachment of the entire industrial and
trade process, which is commercialism,
unless we choose arbitrarily to apply
this word to whatever is evil in our in-
dustrial life. The products which con-
stitute wealth must in some way be
exchanged, and the methods of these
exchanges must be organized. What
names shall we give to those trade func-
tions ? Shall we invent a new word,
or shall we retain commercialism, with
the knowledge that it must, like other
race forces, include the evil with the
good?
After writing the words " trade is
essentially corrupt," Spencer shows us
that he does n't quite mean it. He not
198
Is Commercialism in Disgrace ?
only speaks of "the large amount of
honest dealing," but adds, "There is no
good reason for believing that the trad-
ing classes are intrinsically worse than
other classes." He then straightway
exposes with much skill the frailties in
other professions. Nor does he fall into
the error of many socialists, who would
have us believe that, if it were not for
our present business regime, all other
callings, like medicine, letters, law, and
politics would forthwith be clean and
disinterested.
By no torturing of the word can com-
mercialism be made to bear so heavy a
burden. Average human nature, with
its undisciplined hungers, underlies this
and all other ways of winning power.
It has come about that no symbol of
what man desires has quite the fasci-
nation that attaches to money. With
neither question nor delay, it exchanges
for all other forms of wealth. As no
other, it opens the way to every satisfac-
tion, save the rarest and highest, for
which ordinary folk do not agonize. To
possess this medium of exchange a part
of the race will sacrifice most other
values.
Because the most dazzling prizes in
this kind are connected with the market
and trade, ambitious men flock thither
and play the game according to their
character, as they play all other games,
— love, war, or politics. Even in the
excesses of these " men of the market,"
they usually act' with the consent of the
community in which they live. A cor-
poration wants a franchise for a street
railway, and it wants it at the earliest
possible date. The bolder officials say
plainly, that, if it is to he done in busi-
ness fashion, legislatures or city councils
must be manipulated.
Now it happens that the whole com-
munity wants quickness, as the business
man wants it. Society is impatient for
speedy and imposing results. This is
the atmosphere in which our hardiest
business men live ijj common with most
of their neighbors. If there is a twist
in the character of the petty retailer, he
plays the game just as disreputably as
the most rakish millionaire. Blood sis-
ter to these is the woman who, with more
or less indirection, lies her pretty things
through the Custom House in known
violation of the law of her own land. Of
the same kin is that multitude of those
whose delight is in extremes of cheapness
that are a direct premium on dishonesty.
or inconsistent with a living wage to the
workers, as in the sweat-shop, or in the
many uses of child labor.
While low-priced commodities are as
much a boon to people of small resources
as are higher wages, there are countless
forms of cheapness under which dishon-
esty is organized with deliberate intent
to trick the public. They may take
shape in arbitrary rebates to favored
persons, or in a " cut-price " drug store,
where articles known for their genuine-
ness and excellence are advertised at cost.
If one asks in these jugglers' shops for
the honest article, the main occupation
behind the counter is to persuade the
customer that some adulterated article,
at half the price, is quite as good. This
succeeds often enough to make the im-
position profitable. Necessity, ignorance,
or greed on the part of the customer
gives enormous scope to these humbug
wiles.
It is again the very essence of the
whole gambling spirit, and the protean
shapes it takes in the community, to
get an advantage without an equivalent.
Yet from top to bottom, this temper per-
meates society. It may be nearly as com-
mon among factory operatives as in a club
of the idle rich. Newshoys, miners, and
dagos may do far more gambling in pro-
portion to their means than any class
of the well-to-do, as it is almost a pri-
mary occupation among many primitive
peoples who have no commercialism what-
ever.
Admitting, then, to the full the dreary
list of sinister facts that are a part of
Is Commercialism in Disgrace ?
199
trade, there is no namable class among
us that has not its deliberate share in a
common guilt. Most of us directly or
indirectly are " in it," and give continu-
ance to the ills by our own easy acqui-
escence in accepting the fruits.
I have often heard a literary man in
a fine frenzy of resentment against com-
mercialism, although at regular intervals
he went into deliberate partnership with
the object of his scorn. I have heard
a clergyman very eloquent against trade
abuses upon which much of his church
and charitable work directly depended,
and still more indirectly depended. I
have known an Arts and Crafts Society
many of whose members were very su-
perior in their belief that commercialism
was the best synonym for general degen-
eracy, yet this admirable association, as
it got to work, became definitely com-
mercial. One of the leaders told me,
" The truth is, we can't do any work as
an organization, without adopting trade
principles."
This was said apologetically and with
regret, yet the society was justified from
its own point of view. It was in no
sense primarily a money-making institu-
tion. This would have been its defeat.
Its controlling aim was the artistic edu-
cation of the community. That a mar-
ket had to be organized, and trade rela-
tions established to connect the worker
and the buyer ; that the society came to
act as middleman, taking a profit on ar-
ticles sold, was commercial, but it was
this wholly freed from abuses.
I have known a society to fail and
close its doors because it would not com-
promise even to this extent, and its fail-
ure was deserved. It was trying to
meet a problem by running away from
it. Trade alliances may be formed that
are as honorable as any of life's activities.
Our first plain duty is to stop telling lies
about trade as a whole. By far the larger
part of business is carried on in decent
and uneventful ways, with open competi-
tion on every hand. Innumerable shops,
mills, stores, — even the department car-
avansaries,— are so pitted against one
another in unfenced fields, that their very
existence is conditioned on serving the
public with better and cheaper products.
They rest solidly upon a credit system
that assumes the competence and gen-
eral integrity of those in control. Much
more than three fourths of our wealth-
making and distributing is of this char-
acter.
The so-called trust touches hardly ten
per cent of our commodities. No class that
can be named has, upon the whole, more
readiness and ability for good citizen-
ship than that of those who have gained
their moral strength by carrying business
burdens. Proofs of this are at hand in
most communities where hard and unpaid
service to the public is given by business
men. It is as unfair to say that the trade
activities which engage these men are in
disgrace, as to say that religion, education,
or law is in disgrace. There are men
who direct science and invention to evil
objects. To this degree, such persons
are, or ought to be, under ban. In no
other sense should commercialism be un-
der condemnation. The use of its mech-
anism to further huge schemes has set
its ugly stamp on so many shady ventures,
that we confuse this occasional use with
the incalculably greater service which or-
ganized industry renders.
It is these excesses of the " dramatic
tenth of business " which justly excite
our pessimistic humors. The winners
in this game often have the gamblers'
vices. They riot in showy expenditures.
Their pleasures must have the glare and
spice of extravagance. Order and re-
straint become as intolerable to them as
to a prostitute. Yet the very glitter and
loudness of their lives fix upon them
a degree of attention grotesquely out of
proportion to their real share in our na-
tional life. They are as exceptional as
purposed fraud is exceptional in the en-
tire volume of business. Seen upon the
background of the whole, it is partial
200
Is Commercialism in Disgrace ?
and occasional, rather than uniform and
organic.
The world's first and most imperious
concern is to get its living. The methods
through which this is accomplished can-
not always bear the seal of the later and
the higher virtues. Practical exigencies
are first in order, and will long remain
so. Though, for the most part, bereft of
beauty, they are not necessarily immor-
al. The exchange of commodities by the
help of money, or by primitive swapping,
may carry, and usually does carry, an ad-
vantage to both parties. If it were not
generally so it could not go on.
Ills enough are here, as in every walk
of life, but they are evils to be distin-
guished from things not evil. Immense
energy is devoted to the art of healing,
but shameless quackeries are practiced
every day by armies of men and women
who play upon the elemental fears and
superstitious of the race. To this extent
an excellent profession is in disgrace.
Except by a belated theologian here
and there, we no longer hear science
anathematized. The dignity and univer-
sality of its service are conceded, yet it,
too, is in disgrace precisely as commercial-
ism is in disgrace. As electricity may
light either a brothel or a village library,
science may have many perverse uses.
It enables trained men to use their skill
in adulterating foods, medicines, drinks,
knowing that lying labels will be attached
with express intent to deceive the buyer.
A stigma so far rests upon science, or,
more strictly, upon the men who use it
basely. In no other sense can commer-
cialism be brought to judgment. . There
is this large difference. Into trade and
commerce the main energies of our peo-
ple are poured. It is overwhelmingly
the occupation of the many and of the
strong. In bulk and intensity it is su-
preme. In proportion to this mass of
effort, has it more abuses than chemistry ?
Has the average business man more or
subtler temptations than the doctor, the
lawyer, or the clergyman ? I do not be-
lieve it, different as the temptations may
be. It is, moreover, by this yielding to
temptation that the case is to be judged
in every calling. It is in each case the
man we are criticising, and not the field
in which he works. We do not say that
electricity is good or bad, farther than
men direct it to social hurt or to social
welfare. Politics is in disgrace enough,
yet no jot or tittle farther than men de-
mean themselves in working it. In the
hand of the gamester, commercialism
may turn to piracy or petty pilfering,
but it is against him and his kind that
the gravamen always holds.
Nor is much bettering likely to come,
faster than the intellectual and moral
recognition of this fact. President Had-
ley is right when he asks that business
turpitude be met by social ostracism. It
must be met, too, not by easy and safe
abstractions, but definitely and person-
ally. In a social club, I once saw a man
not only refuse to shake the proffered
hand of a well-known financier, but de-
liberately turn his back upon him. The
reason was given to me thus : " He gives
regularly the largest amounts in my ward
to corrupt members of the city govern-
ment. He has done it systematically for
years, because he wants to break certain
ordinances, or get an extension of fran-
chises for a corporation in which he is a
heavy owner. When I charged him with
this, he got mad and said, ' Well, do you
think me fool enough to want what you
call honest men there ? ' I cut him for
that, and shall never recognize him so-
cially or personally again."
This gentleman had large interests of
his own, and ran some risks because of
this uncompromising act. Yet the strong-
holds of ill-doing are never taken, and
the area of social morality extended, by
any other means. A hundred men in
that club knew this freebooter's charac-
ter as well as the man who cut him.
Most of them would have been very lofty
and severe with a rogue in fustian, but
before this well-groomed financier, with
Is Commercialism in Disgrace ?
201
power, a palace, and costly toys, there was
general and smiling deference. There
is no knavish ruse in trade so dangerous
as this humiliating fact of our common
cowardice. Nor is there any cure apart
from its cure in ourselves. As long as
the fleshpots of utmost attainable wealth
are desired above all things, we shall be
speciously busy in framing excuses why
we should not show the mettle of this
gentleman at the club.
Given in any community men and wo-
men enough of his moral valor, and the
most scandalous practices of commercial-
ism would begin to diminish. It is true,
they would have to be scandalous in the
sense of being conspicuously and prova-
bly evil, — an evil as definite and heinous
as that of using company funds to pur-
chase walking delegates ; of promoting
combinations known from the start to be
fraudulent, or, as in the case just cited, in
which dignified officials permit the use of
corporation resources to strengthen the
political party from which it expects to
get lawless privileges.
We are very squeamish about such
unpleasant words as boycott. It is as-
sociated with insolent perversities, yet
there is about as much social morality
in any community as there is boycot-
ting of persons definitely known to be
evil. The eminent and telling service
which a small group of plucky men has
rendered to cleaner politics in Chicago
has been through the boycotting of men
found on examination to be personally
unfit for office. It is to a Philadelphian
that we owe the sentence, " Until we get
moral stamina enough to begin to boycott
certain very influential persons in our city
and state, we shall retain our distinction
of being the worst governed city in the
country."
This by no means denies the need of
many legal and administrative reforms :
some approach to equity in taxation ; an
extension of community power over the
franchises and values that are distinct-
ly social in their origin, and the utmost
furtherance of the non-partisan concep-
tion of municipal politics. These, and
many other practical duties, are still un-
done. They are measui-es, every one, that
strike at private privilege in its most
dangerous form. Many outer changes
must go hand in hand with the trans-
formation of our inner temper, purpose,
and aim in life. There is, nevertheless,
no darker delusion from which we suffer
than this : that we are abject and help-
less until the external and administra-
tive reforms have been effected.
It would be but the fool's paradise to
cozen ourselves with the hope that the
evils of commercialism will much abate
until we desire other objects more eager-
ly than we desire what the overdoing of
commercialism gives us, — that is, the
too long list of our materialistic excesses ;
the unnatural lust for bigness, glare, in-
tensity, display, strain, and needless com-
plication. In coming days, when the na-
tional heart, perhaps from very surfeit,
sickens of all this, and looks for peace
and health in simpler and less distracted
ways, it may then be that our span can be
lived out with new capacity for achieve-
ment more consistent with serenity, re-
pose, and gladness.
John Graham Brooks.
202
The Common Lot.
THE COMMON LOT.1
rv.
THE next morning Jackson Hart was
at work once more on the plans for
the Denver hotel. Now that he knew
his fate, the draughting-room under the
great skylights of the Dearborn Building
seemed like a prison. The men in the
office, he felt sure, had read all about
the will, and had had their say upon his
affairs before he had come in. He could
tell that from the additional nonchalance
in the manner of the head draughtsman,
Cook. Early in the afternoon a wel-
come interruption came to him in the
shape of an urgent call from the electri-
cians working on the Canostota apart-
ment house on the South Side. The
head of the office asked Hart to go to the
Canostota and straighten the men out, as
Harmon, their engineer, was at home ill.
As Jackson crossed the street to take
the elevated he met his cousin. They
walked together to the station, and as
Wheeler was turning away, the architect
broke out : —
" I 've been thinking over uncle's will.
I can't say I think it was fair — to treat
me like that after — after all these years."
The lawyer smiled coldly.
" We both got the same deal," he re-
marked.
" Well, that don't make it any better ;
besides, you have had as good as money
from him long ago. Your position and
mine aren't just the same."
" No, that 's so," the lawyer admitted.
" But what are you going to do about
it?"
" I don't know yet. I want to think
it over. How long " — he started to ask.
" How long have you to give notice
you want to contest ? About three weeks,"
Wheeler replied coolly. " Of course, you
know that if you fight, you '11 put your
mother's legacy in danger. And I guess
Hollister and the judge would fight."
" And you ? "
Wheeler shrugged his shoulders.
" Oh, I suppose I should stick with
the others."
Then Wheeler nodded and was off
down the street. He was as much dis-
turbed as if his cousin had told him it
was going to rain on the morrow. Hart
continued on his way to the Canostota.
There he found the foreman for the elec-
trical contractor, and spent a busy hour
explaining to the man the intricacies of
the office blue prints. Then the steam-
fitter got hold of him, and it was nearly
five o'clock before he had time to think
of himself or his own affairs. As he
emerged from the basement by a hole
left in the floor for the plumbers and
steam-fitters to run their pipes through,
he noticed a section of the fireproof ,
partition which had been accidentally
knocked out. Through this hole he could
see one of the steel I-beams that support-
ed the flooring above, where it had been
drilled to admit the passing of a steam
pipe. Something unusual in the thick-
ness of the metal caught his eye, and he
paused where he was, halfway out of
the basement, to look at it again. The
I-beam seemed unaccountably thin. He
was not quite familiar, even yet, with the
material side of building in America ; but
he knew in a general way the weights of
steel beams that were ordinarily specified
in Wright's office for buildings of this
size.
" How 's this, Davidson ? " he asked
the steam-fitter, who was close at his
heels. " Is n't that a pretty light fifteen-
inch I-beam ? "
The workman looked absolutely blank.
" I dunno. I expect it 's what 's called
for."
Copyright, 1903, by ROBERT HERBICK.
The Common Lot.
203
Even if the man had known all about
it, he would have said nothing. It was
silly to ask a subcontractor to give evi-
dence damaging to his employer. The
architect stooped, and asked the man to
hand him his rule. As he was trying to
measure the section of steel, he saw a
man's face looking down at him from the
floor above. Presently a burly form ap-
peared in the opening. It was Graves,
who was the general contractor for the
building.
" We have n't begun to patch up the
tile yet," the contractor observed, nod-
ding to the architect. " We thought
we 'd leave it open here and there until
Mr. Harmon could get around and look
into things. I 'm expecting Mr. Wright
will be out here the first of the week,
too."
The contractor talked slowly, without
taking his eyes from Hart. He was a
large, full-bearded man, with a manner
self-confident or assuming, as one chose
to take it. Hart was always at a loss
how to treat a man like Graves, —
whether as a kind of upper workman to
be ordered about, or as a social equal.
" Is that so ? " he asked in a noncom-
mittal tone. " Mr. Harmon has n't been
out here much of late ? "
" No, sir. It must be three weeks or
more since Mr. Harmon was here last.
He 's been sick that long, ain't he ? "
The steam-fitter had slipped away.
Hart had it on his lips to ask the con-
tractor to show him the specifications for
the steel work. Graves kept his cool
gray eyes fastened on the young archi-
tect, while he said : —
" That 's why I 've been keeping things
back, so as Mr. Wright could satisfy
himself that everything was all right. A
tei-ribly particular man, that Mr. Wright.
If you can please him ! "
He was studying the young man be-
fore him, and very ably supplying an-
swers to the architect's doubts before he
could express them. The contractor did
not pause to give Hart time to think, but
kept a stream of his slow, confident words
flowing over the architect.
" You fellows give us a lot of bother.
Now take that tile. Mr. Wright speci-
fies Caper's Al, which happens to be out
of the market just now. To please him
I sent to Cleveland and Buffalo for some
odds and ends they had down there. But
there are a dozen makes just as good ! "
He spoke like a man who did always
a little more than his duty. Although
the architect was conscious of the skillful
manner in which his attention was being
switched from the steel beams, he felt in-
clined to trust the contractor.
Graves was not one of the larger con-
tractors employed on the firm's buildings.
He had worked up from small beginnings
as a master mason. Wright had used
him on several little commissions, and
had always found him eager to do his
best. This was the first job of any con-
siderable size that Graves had done for
the firm, and he had got this by under-
bidding considerably all the other gen-
eral contractors who had been invited to
bid on the work. These facts Hart did
not happen to know.
" Are you going north, Mr. Hart ? "
Graves asked, as they turned to the
street entrance. " My team is just out-
side. Shall be pleased to give you a
lift."
Speaking thus he ushered the architect
from the Canostota where the dusk was
already falling.
The contractor's horse was a nervous,
fast little beast. The light runabout
whirled into the broad avenue of Grand
Boulevard, and there Graves let the ani-
mal out for a couple of blocks. A thin
smile of satisfaction wrinkled the con-
tractor's bearded lips. Then he pulled
on the reins, and turned in his seat to
face the architect.
" I 'm glad of this chance to see you,
Mr. Hart," he began pleasantly. " I
have been thinking lately that we might
be of some use to each other."
He paused to let his words sink into
204
The Common Lot.
his companion's mind. Then he resumed
in a reflective manner : —
" I ain't content to build just for other
folks. I want to put up something on
my own account. Oh, nothing like as
fine as that Canostota, but something
pretty and attractive, and something that
will pay. I 've just the lot for it, out
south alongside Washington Park. It 's
a peach ! A corner and two hundred
feet. Say ! Why won't you come out
right now and have a look at it ? Can
you spare the time ? Good."
The little runabout whisked around,
and they went speeding south over the
hard boulevard.
" Now 's about the time to build. I 've
owned the property ever since the slump
in real estate right after the fair. Well,
I want an architect on my own account !
I suppose I could go to one of those Jews
who sell their dinky little blue prints
by the yard. Most of the flat buildings
hereabouts come that way. But I want
something swell. That 's going to be a
fine section of the city soon, and looks
count in a building, as elsewhere."
Hart laughed at this cordial testimony
to his art.
" There 's your boss, Wright. But
he 's too high-toned for me, — would n't
look at anything that toted up less than
the six figures. And I guess he don't
do much designing himself. He leaves
that to you young fellows,! "
Hart could see, now, the idea that was
in the contractor's mind. They pulled
up near the south corner of the Park, be-
side some vacant land. It was, as Graves
said, a very favorable spot for a showy
apartment building.
" I want something real handsome,"
the contractor continued. " It '11 be a
high-priced building. And I think you
are the man to do it."
Graves brought this out like a shot.
" Why, I should like to think of it,"
the architect began conventionally, not
sure what he ought to say.
" Yes, you 're the man. I saw the
plans for that Aurora church one day
while I was waiting to talk with Mr.
Wright, and I said to myself then,
' There 's the man to draw my plans.
That feller 's got something out of the
ordinary in him ! He 's got style ! ' '
Praise, even from the mob, is honey to
the artist. Hart instinctively thought
better of the self-confident contractor,
and decided that he was a bluff, honest
man, — common, but well meaning.
" Well, what do you say, Mr. Hart ? "
It ended with Hart's practically agree-
ing to prepare a preliminary sketch.
When it came to the matter of business,
the young architect found that, notwith-
standing the contractor's high considera-
tion of his talent, he was willing to offer
only the very lowest terms for his work.
He told the contractor that he should
have to leave Wright's office before un-
dertaking the commission.
" But," he said with a sudden rush of
will, " I was considering starting for my-
self very soon, anyway."
It was not until after the contractor
had dropped him at his club in the
down-town district that he remembered
the steel beams in the Canostota. Then it
occurred to him that possibly, had it not
been for the accident which had brought
Graves to that part of the building just
as he was on his knees trying to mea-
sure the thickness of the metal, the con-
tractor might not have discovered his
great talent. As he entered the club
washroom, the disagreeable thought came
to him that, if the I-beams were not right,
Graves had rather cleverly closed his
mouth about the Canostota. In agreeing
to do a piece of work for Wright's con-
tractor, he had placed himself where he
could not easily get that contractor into
trouble with his present employer.
As he washed his hands, scrubbing
them as if they had been wood to re-
move the afternoon's dirt, he felt that
there was more than one kind of grime
in the city.
The Common Lot.
205
V.
There were very few men to be found
in the club at this hour. The dingy
library, buzzing like a beehive at noon
with young men, was empty now except
for a stranger who was whiling away
his time before meeting a dinner en-
gagement. The men that the archi-
tect met at this club were, like himself,
younger members of the professions,
struggling up in the crowded ranks of
law, medicine, architecture. Others were
in brokers' offices, or engaged in general
business. Some of them had been his
classmates in Cornell, or in the techno-
logical school, and these had welcomed
him with a little dinner on his return
from Paris.
After that cheerful reunion he had
seen less of these old friends than he
had hoped to, when he had contemplated
Chicago from his Paris apartment. Per-
haps there had been something of envy
among them for Jackson Hart. Things
had seemed very pleasantly shaped for
him, and Chicago is yet a community
that resents special favors.
Every one was driving himself at top
speed. At noon the men fell together
about the same table in the grill-room,
— worried, fagged, preoccupied. As
soon as the day's work was over, their
natural instinct was to flee from the dirt
and noise of the business street, where
the club was situated, to the cleaner quar-
ters north or south, or to the semi-rural
suburbs. Thus the centrifugal force of
the city was irresistible.
To-night there were a number of men
in the cardroom, sitting over a game of
poker, which, judging from the ash-trays
about them, had been in progress since
luncheon. Several other men with hats
on and coats over their arms were stand-
ing about the table looking on.
" Well, Jackie, my boy ! " one of the
players called out, " where have you been
hiding yourself this week ? "
Ben Harris, the man who hailed the
architect, had apparently been drinking
a good deal. The other men at the ta-
ble called out sharply, " Shut up, Ben.
Play!"
But the voluble Harris, whose drink
had made him more than usually im-
pudent, remarked further : —
"Say, Jack! ain't, you learned yet
that we don't pattern after the German
Emperor here in Chicago ? Better comb
out your mustache, or they '11 be taking
you for some foreign guy."
Hart merely turned his back on Har-
ris, and listened with exaggerated inter-
est to what a large, heavy man, with a
boy's smooth face, was saying : —
" He was of no special 'count in col-
lege, — a kind of second-rate hustler,
you know. But, my heavens ! Since he
struck this town, he 's got in his work.
I don't believe he knows enough law to
last him over night. But he knows how
to make the right men think he does.
He started in to work for those Selinas
Mills people, — damage suits and collect-
ing. Here in less than five years he 's
drawing the papers for the consolidation
of all the paper mills in the country ! "
" Who 's that, Billy ?" Hart asked.
" Leverett, Joe Leverett. He was Yale
'89, and at the law school with me."
" He must have the right stuff in
him," commented one man.
" I don't know about that ! " the first
speaker retorted. " Some kind of stuff,
of course. But I said he was no lawyer,
and never will be, and I repeat it. And
what 's more, half the men who are earn-
ing the big money in law here in Chi-
cago don't know enough law to try a
case properly."
" That 's so," assented one man.
" Same thing in medicine."
" Oh, it 's the same all over."
The men about the card-table launched
out into a heated discussion of the one
great topic — Success. The game of
poker finally closed, and the players
joined in the conversation. Fresh drinks
206
The Common Lot.
were ordered, and cigars were passed
about. The topic caught the man most
eager to go home, and fired the hrain
most fagged.
" The pity of it, too," said the large
man called Billy, dominating the room
with his deep voice and his deliberate
speech, — " the pity of it is that it ruins
the professions. You can see it right
here in Chicago. Who cares for fine
professional work, if it don't bring in
the stuff ? Look at our courts ! Yes,
look at our doctors ! And look at our
buildings ! It 's money every time. The
professions are commercialized."
" Oh, Billy ! " exclaimed Ben Harris.
" Is this a commencement oration you
are giving us ? "
A quiet voice broke in from behind
the circle : —
" There 's much in what you say, Mr.
Blount. Time has been when it meant
something of honor for a man to be a
member of one of the learned profes-
sions. Men were content to take part
of their pay in honor and respect from
the community. There 's no denying
that's all changed now. We measure
everything by one yardstick, and that
is money. So, the able lawyer and the
able doctor have joined the race with
the mob for the dollars. But " — his eye
seemed to rest on the young architect,
who was listening attentively — " that
state of affairs can't go on. When we
shake down in this modern world of ours,
and have got used to our wealth, and
have made the right adjustment between
capital and labor, — the professions, the
learned professions, will be elevated once
more. Men are so made that they want
to respect something. And in the long
run they will respect learning, ideas, and
devotion to the public weal."
" That 's all right, Pemberton," Har-
ris retorted. " That 's first-class talk.
But I guess I see about as much of
human nature in my business as any
man, and I tell you, it 's only human
nature to get what you can out of the
game. What men respect in this town
is money, — first, last, and all the time.
So it 's only natural for a man, whether
he is a lawyer or anything else, to do
as the other Romans do."
Harris brought his bony, lined hand
down on the card-table with a thump,
and leaned forward, thrusting out his
long, unshaven chin at the older man
who had spoken. His black hair, which
was thin above the temples and across
the middle of his head, was rumpled,
his collar bent, and his cuffs blackened
about the edges. Hart had known him
as a boy twelve years before at the South
Side High School. From the Univer-
sity of Michigan Harris had entered
a broker's office, and had made money
on the Board of Trade. Lately it had
been reported that he was losing money
in wheat.
" Yes, sir," he snarled on, having sup-
pressed the others for the moment. "It
don't make much difference, either, how
you get your money so far as I can see.
Whether you do a man in a corner in
wheat, or run a pool room. All is, if
you want to be in the game, you must
have the price of admission about you.
And the rest is talk for the ladies and
the young."
The older man, Pemberton, said in a
severe tone : —
" That is easy to say and easy to be-
lieve. But when I think of the magnifi-
cent gift to the public just made by one
of these very men whom you would con-
sider a mere money-grabber, I confess I
am obliged to doubt your easy analysis
of our modern life ! "
Pemberton spoke with a kind of au-
thority. He was one of the older men
of the club, much respected in the city,
and perfectly fearless. But the broker,
also, feared no man's opinion.
" Gifts to education ! " sneered Ben
Harris. " That 's what they do to show
off when they're through with their
goods. Anyway, there 's too much edu-
cation going around. It don't count.
The Common Lot.
207
The only thing that counts, to-day, here,
now, is money. Can you make it or
steal it or — inherit it ! "
He looked at Jackson Hart and
laughed. The architect disliked this vul-
gar reference to his own situation, but,
on the whole, he was inclined to agree-
with the broker.
" I am sorry that such ideas should
be expressed inside this club," Pember-
ton answered gravely. " If there is one
place in this city where the old ideals
of the professions should be reverenced,
where men should deny that cheap phi-
losophy of the street, by their acts as
well as by their words, it should be here
in this club."
Some of the other men nodded their
approval of this speech. They said no-
thing, however ; for the conversation had
reached a point of delicacy that made
men hesitate to say what they thought.
Pemberton turned on his heel and
walked away. The irrepressible Harris
called after him belligerently : —
" Oh, I don't know about that, now,
Mr. Pemberton. It takes all kinds of
men to make a club, you know."
The little group broke up. Harris
linked his arm in Hart's.
" I 've got something to say to you,
Jackie," he said boisterously. " We '11
order some dinner, if you are free, and
I '11 put you up to something that 's bet-',
ter than old Pemberton's talk. It just
occurred to me while we were gassing
here."
The young architect did not quite
like Harris's style, but he had planned to
dine at the club, and they went upstairs
to the dining-room together. He was
curious to hear what the broker might
have to suggest to him.
Hart had agreed with Pemberton's
ideas, naturally enough, in the abstract.
But in the concrete, the force of circum-
stances, here in this roaring city where
he found himself caught, was fast pre-
paring him to accept the Harris view.
He was neither an idealist nor a weak
man : he was merely a young man, still,
making up his character as he went
along, and taking color more or less
from the landscape he found himself in.
His aspirations for art, if not fine,
were sufficiently earnest and sincere.
He had thought of himself as luckily
fortuned, so that he could devote himself
to getting real distinction in his profes-
sion. So in Paris. Now, brought back
from that pleasant world into this stern
city, with all its striving, apparently, cen-
tred upon the one business of making
money, then deprived by what seemed to
him a harsh and unfair freak of fortune
of all his pleasant expectations, he was
trying to read the face of Destiny. And
there he seemed to find written what this
gritty broker had harshly expressed.
" Say, you 've got a good friend in
Mrs. Will Phillips," Harris began blunt-
ly when they were seated opposite each
other.
Hart remembered that he had not fol-
lowed the widow's invitation to call upon
her, all thought of her having been driv-
en out of his mind by the happenings of
the last few days.
" How do you know ? " he asked.
" Oh, I know all right. She 's a good
customer of ours. I 've been talking to
her half the afternoon about things."
His next remark had nothing to do
with Mrs. Phillips.
"You fellows don't make much money
building houses. Ain't that so ? You
need other jobs. Well, I am going to
give you a pointer."
He stopped mysteriously, and then be-
gan again : —
" I happen to know that the C. R. &
N. Road is going to put a lot of money
into improvements this summer. Among
other things they 're getting ready to
build new stations all along the north
line, — you know, up through the sub-
urbs, — Forest Park, Shoreham, and so
on. They 've got a lot of swell patronage
out that way, and they are making ready
for more."
208
The Common Lot.
Hart listened to the broker intently.
He wondered why Harris should happen
to know this news ahead of the general
public, and he tried to think how it
might help his fortune.
" That 's where they are going to put
a lot of their surplus earnings. Now,
those stations must be the top of the
style, — real buildings, not sheds. I
don't think they have any architect."
" Oh ! " objected Hart, disappointed.
" The president or one of the vice presi-
dents will have a son, or nephew, or some
one to work in. Or, perhaps, they will
have a competitive trial for the plans."
" Perhaps they will, and perhaps they
won't," Harris answered knowingly.
" The man who will decide all that is
their first vice president, — Raymond,
Colonel Stevens P. Raymond, — know
him ? "
Hart shook his head.
" Well, Mrs. Phillips does. He lives
out in Forest Park, where she 's think-
ing of building a big house."
" Is Mrs. Phillips thinking of build-
ing in Forest Park ? " the architect
asked.
Harris looked at him in a bored man-
ner.
" Why, I thought you were going to
draw the plans ! "
" She asked me to come to see her,"
Hart admitted. " But that was all."
" Well, if a rich and good-looking wo-
man asks you to call, I should n't take
all year about making up my mind."
Hart could not help thinking that it
would be harder to go to Mrs. Phillips
now than if he had not had this talk
with the broker. Their meeting in Paris
had been pleasant, unalloyed with busi-
ness. He remembered how he had ra-
ther patronized the ambitious young wo-
man, who had desired to meet artists, to
go to their studios, and to have little
dinners where every one talked French
but her stupid husband.
"The widow Phillips thinks a lot of
your ability, Jackie, and old S. P. R.
thinks a lot of the widow. Now do you
see ? "
The architect laughed nervously. He
could see plainly enough what was
meant, but he did not like it altogether.
" She can do what she likes with the
old man. The job is as good as yours,
if you do the proper thing. I 've given
you the tip straight ahead of the whole
field. Not a soul knows that the C. R.
& N. is going in for this kind of thing."
" It will be a big chance," the archi-
tect replied. " It was good of you to
think of me, Ben."
" That 's all right. It popped into my
head when that ass Pemberton began his
talk about your uncle's gift to the pub-
lic. I must say, it seemed to me a dirty
trick of the old man to cut you out the
way he did. Are you going to fight the
will, or is it so fixed that you can't ? "
" I don't know, yet."
" To bring a fellow up as he did you,
and then knock on him at the end, —
it 's just low-down."
That was the view Jackson Hart was
more and more inclined to take of his
uncle's will, and he warmed to the coarse,
outspoken broker, who had shown him
real friendliness. Harris seemed to him
to be warm-blooded and human. The
young architect was beginning to feel
that this was not a world for delicacy of
motive and refinement. When Hart sug-
gested diffidently that some large firm of
architects would probably be chosen by
the C. R. & N. people, Harris said : —
" Rats ! Raymond won't hunt round
for references, beyond what Mrs. Phil-
lips will give him. You see her as quick
as you can, and tell her you want the
chance."
The opportunity which Harris had
suggested would be given to him by a
woman. Yet, however much he might
dislike to go to a woman for such help, the
chance began to loom large in his imagi-
nation. Here was something that Wright
himself would be glad to have. He saw
himself in his own office, having two
The Common Lot.
209
large commissions to start with, and
possibly a third, — Mrs. Phillips's new
house in Forest Park.
Perhaps Wright did know, after all,
about the C. R. & N. matter. Hart's fight-
ing blood rose : he would do his best to
snatch the good thing from him, or from
any other architect ! He forgot his con-
tempt for that American habit of pull,
which he had much deplored in studio
discussions. All that had been theory ;
this was personal and practical.
Within the day Fortune had smiled
upon him twice. Neither time, to be
sure, was the way to her favor quite
what he would have chosen if he could
have chosen. But one must not dis-
criminate too nicely when one picks up
the cards to play. . . .
Below, from the busy street, rose the
piercing note of the city, — rattle, roar,
and clang, scarcely less shrill at eight of
an evening than at noon. From the bulk-
heads on the roof of the next building
soared a drab-colored cloud of steam,
eddying upwards even to the open win-
dows of the club dining-room. The noise,
the smell, the reek of the city touched
the man, folded him in, swayed him like
a subtle opiate. The thirst of the ter-
rible game of living, the desire of things,
the brute love of triumph filled his veins.
Old Powers Jackson, contemptuously
putting him to one side, had uncon-
sciously worked this state of mind in
him. He, Jackson Hart, would show
the world that he could fight for himself,
could snatch the prize that every one
was fighting for, the prize of man's life,
— a little pot of gold !
VI.
" How did young Mr. Hart take the
news of the will? " Mrs. Phillips asked
her brother-in-law the first time she saw
him after the funeral.
" Why, all right, I guess," the judge
answered slowly. " Why should n't he ? "
VOL. xcni. — NO. 556. 14
" I hoped he would fight it," the
widow replied, eyeing the judge calmly.
" I believe he is n't that much of a fool.
Just because Powers looked after his
mother, and fed him all these years, and
gave him an expensive education, — why
should he be obliged to leave the chap
all his money, if he did n't want to ? "
Mrs. Phillips avoided a direct reply,
and continued to announce her opinions,
— a method of conversation which she
knew was highly irritating to the judge.
" Philanthropy ! What 's the use of
such philanthropy ? The city has enough
schools. It 's all foolishness to give your
money to other people to eat up ! "
" That is a matter of feeling," Judge
Phillips answered dryly. " I should n't
expect you to feel as Powers did about
such things."
Harrison Phillips had few illusions
concerning his sister - in - law, and she
knew it. Years before they had reached
the point where they dispensed with po-
lite subterfuges. He had known her ever
since she came to Chicago from a little
Illinois town to study music. Indeed,
he had first introduced his younger bro-
ther to her, he remembered unhappily.
She was Louise Faunce, then, — a keen,
brown-eyed country girl of eighteen.
When Will Phillips wanted to marry
her, the judge had already felt the girl's
little claws, and had been foolish enough
to warn his brother. Will Phillips was
a dull young man, and had poor health.
The older brother knew that Will was
being married for his money, — a con-
siderable fortune for a girl from Ot-
tumwa, Illinois.
And the marriage had not been a
happy one. The last years of his life
Will Phillips had taken to drinking. The
judge felt that the wife had driven his
brother to his sodden end, and he hated
her for it, with a proper and legal hatred.
The last six months of her husband's
life, Mrs. Phillips had spent in Europe
with her two children. Why she had
chosen to return to Chicago after her
210
The Common Lot.
husband's death was a mystery to the
judge, who never gave Louise Phillips
credit for half her character.
She told him that she had found Eu-
rope an unsuitable place in which to
bring up the children, and proposed to
build a new house, perhaps in Forest
Park, — one of the older and more de-
sirable suburbs to the north of the city.
" I must make a home for my children
among their father's friends," she said to
the judge with perfect propriety. " Ve-
netia, especially, should have the right
background."
Venetia, so named in one of the rare
accesses of sentiment which came to Mrs.
Phillips, as to all mortals, was now six-
teen years old. Her brother Stanwood,
a year younger, had been placed in a
fashionable Eastern school, where he was
preparing for Yale, and ultimately for
the " career of diplomacy," as his mother
called it.
The judge had been discussing to-day
his sister-in-law's intentions in regard to
the new house, and she had notified him
that she should need presently a large
amount of money.
" If you will wait," she remarked,
having exhausted her opinion about phi-
lanthropy and Powers Jackson's will,
" you might see my architect. I have
asked Mr. Hart to call this afternoon."
" I don't pine to see him," the old
man retorted testily. " So you have gone
that far ? "
" Yes ! There is n't the slightest use
of being disagreeable about it, you see.
Nothing that you can say will change my
mind. It never has. You would like
to keep me from spending the money.
But you can't without a row, a scandal.
Besides, it 's a good investment for both
the children."
" You were always pretty keen for a
good investment ! "
" You mean by that sarcasm that you
think I was sharp when I married your
brother, because I had nothing but my
good looks. They were worth more than
a husband — who — drank himself — to
death."
" We won't go into that, please," the
judge said, his bright blue eyes glitter-
ing. " I hope, Louise, to live to see the
day when you get what you deserve, —
just how I don't know."
" Thank you, Harrison," Mrs. Phillips
replied unperturbed. " We all do get
what we deserve, sooner or later, don't
we?"
" Sometimes I give up hope ! "
" There 's my young man now ! " she
exclaimed, looking out of the window.
" If you want to know just what extrav-
agances I am going into, you had better
wait."
" I '11 know soon enough ! Where 's
Ven ? I want to see her."
" She should be out riding with John."
Mrs. Phillips rose from her deep chair
to greet the architect. All at once her
face and manner seemed to change from
the hard, cold surface that she had pre-
sented to the judge, the surface of a mid-
dle-aged, shrewd woman. Suddenly she
expanded, opened herself graciously to
the young man.
The old gentleman stalked out of the
drawing-room, with a curt nod and a
grunt for Hart. The architect looked
to the widow for an explanation of the
stormy atmosphere, but she smiled a
warm welcome, ignoring the judge.
" So good of you to answer my note
promptly," she murmured. " For I know
how busy you are ! "
" I had already promised myself the
pleasure," Hart replied quickly, using a
phrase he had thought up on his way
into the room.
As he looked at her resting in her
deep chair, he realized that it was a dis-
tinct pleasure to be there. In Chicago
Mrs. Will Phillips was much more of a
person than she had been in Paris. Still,
the woman in her was the first and last
fact. She was thirty-seven, and in the
very best of health. To one who did not
The Common Lot.
211
lay exclusive emphasis on mere youth,
the first bloom of the fruit, she was
much more beautiful than when she mar-
ried Willie Phillips. Sensitive, nervous,
in the full tide of her physical life, she
had, what is euphemistically called to-
day, temperament. To this instinctive
side of the woman, the handsome, strong,
young man had always appealed.
It is also true that she was clever, and
had learned with great rapidity how to
cover up the holes of a wretched educa-
tion. At first, however, a man could
think of but one thing in the presence
of Mrs. Phillips : —
" You are a woman, and a very pretty
one ! "
Doubtless she meant that men should
think that, and nothing more, at first.
Those who had come through the fire, to
whom she was cold and hard, like an in-
ferior gem, might say with the judge : —
" Louise flings her sex at you from the
first smile. The only thing to do is to
run."
Jackson Hart had not yet reached this
point of experience. He was but dim-
ly aware that the woman opposite him
troubled his mind, preoccupied, as it hap-
pened to be, with business, like a too pro-
nounced perfume. Here, in the hard at-
mosphere of an American city, he was
not inclined to remember the sentimen-
talities of his Paris days. According-
ly, Mrs. Phillips, with quick perception,
dropped the reminiscential tone that she
had been inclined to take. She came
promptly to business : —
" Could you consider a small commis-
sion, Mr. Hart ? " she asked with appar-
ent hesitation.
The architect would have undertaken
to build a doll's house. Nevertheless,
his heart sank at the word " small."
" I so much want your advice, at any
rate. I value your taste so highly. You
taught me how to look at things over
there. And we should agree, should n't
we?"
Then she unfolded more plainly her
purpose of building in Forest Park.
She had thought of something Tudor.
(She had been visiting at a Tudor house
in the East.) But the architect, without
debating the point, sketched on the back
of an envelope the outline of an old
French chateau, — a toy study in part of
the famous chateau at Chenonceaux.
" What a lovely roof ! " Mrs. Phil-
lips exclaimed responsively. " And how
the thing grows under your hand ! It
seems as if you must have had me in
mind for a long time." She leaned over
the little piece of paper, fascinated by
the architect's facility.
As he drew in the facade, he noticed
that the widow had very lovely hair, of
a tone rarely found in America, between
brown and black, dusky. He remem-
bered that he had made the same obser-
vation before in Paris. The arch of her
neck, which was strong and full, was also
excellent. And her skin had a perfect
pallor.
By the time he had made these obser-
vations and finished his rough little
sketch, the Tudor period had been for-
gotten, and the question of the commis-
sion had been really decided. There re-
mained to be debated the matter of cost.
After one or two tactful feints the archi-
tect was forced to ask bluntly what the
widow expected to spend on the house.
At the mention of money Mrs. Phillips's
brows contracted slightly. A trace of
hardness, like fine enamel, stole across
her features.
" What could you build it for ? " she
demanded brusquely.
" Why, on a thing like this you can
spend what you like," he stammered.
"Of course a house in Forest Park
ought to be of a certain kind, — to be a
good investment," he added politely.
" Of course. Would twenty-five thou-
sand dollars do ? "
The architect felt relieved on hearing
the size of the figure, but he had had time
to realize that this agreeable client might
be close in money matters. It would be
212
The Common Lot.
well to have her mind keyed to a liberal
figure at the start, and he said boldly : —
" You could do a good deal for that.
But not a place like this. Such a one
as you ought to have, Mrs. Phillips," he
added, appealing to her vanity.
Once he had called her Louise, and
they both were conscious of the fact.
She eyed him keenly. She was quite
well aware that he wanted to get all the
freedom to develop his sketch that a
good sum of money would give, and also
had in mind the size of his fee, which
would be a percentage of the cost. But
this did not offend her. In this struggle,
mental and polite, over the common
topic of money, she expected him to do
his best.
" It 's no use being small in such mat-
ters," she conceded at length. " Let us
say fifty thousand ! "
" That 's much more possible ! " the
architect replied buoyantly, with a vague
idea already forming that his sketches
might call for a house that would cost
seventy or seventy-five thousand dollars
to complete.
The money matter out of the way, the
widow relapsed into her friendly manner.
" I hope you can begin right away !
I am so anxious to get out of this old
barn, and I want to unpack all the trea-
sures I 've bought in Europe this last
time."
Judge Phillips would have shuddered
to hear his brother's large brick house,
with its neat strip of encircling green
lawn, in Chicago fashion, referred to as
a barn. And the architect, on his side,
knowing something of Louise Phillips's
indiscriminate taste in antiquities, was
resolved to cull the " treasures " before
they found a place in his edifice.
" Why, I '11 begin on some sketches
right away. If they please you, I could
do the plans at once — just as soon as I
get my own office," he added honestly.
" You know I have been working for
Walker, Post & Wright. But I am go-
ing to leave them very soon."
" Yes," Mrs. Phillips replied sympa-
thetically. " I know it ought to have
been so different. I think that will was
disgraceful ! I hope you can break it."
" I don't know that I shall try," he
answered hastily, startled at the widow's
cool comment on his uncle's purposes.
''Well, you know best, I suppose.
But I should think a long time before I
let them build that school."
" I shall see. At any rate, it looks
now as if I should want all the work I
can get," he said, looking into her eyes,
and thinking of what Harris had told
him of the C. R. & N. job. He had
it on his lips to add, " Can't you say a
word for me to your friend Colonel Ray-
mond ? " But he could not bring him-
self to the point of asking outright for
business favors at a woman's hand.
However, she happily saved him from
the crudity of open speech.
" Perhaps I can help you. There 's
something — Well, we won't begin on
that to-day. But you can rest assured
that I am your friend, can't you ? "
They understood each other thus easi-
ly. He knew that she was well aware
of what was in his mind, and was dis-
posed to help him to the full extent of
her woman's power. In his struggle for
money and place, — things that she ap-
preciated, — she would be an able friend.
Having come to a complete agreement
on many matters, in the manner of a
man and a woman, they began to talk of
Paris and of other days. Outside in the
hall there was the sound of steps, and
a laughing, vigorous girl's voice. The
architect could see a thin, tall girl, as
she threw her arms about Judge Phil-
lips's plump neck and pulled his head
to a level with her mouth. He noticed
that Mrs. Phillips was also watching
this scene with stealthy eyes. When
the door had closed upon the judge, she
called : —
" Venetia, will you come here, dear.
I want you to meet Mr. Hart. You re-
member Mr. Hart ? "
The Common Lot.
213
The girl crossed the drawing-room
slowly, the fire in her strangely extin-
guished. She gave a bony little hand
to the architect, and nodded her head,
like a rebellious trick dog. Then she
drew away from the two and stood beside
the table, waiting for the next order.
She was dark like her mother, but
her features lacked the widow's pleasant
curves. They were firm and square, and
a pair of dark eyes looked out moodily
from under heavy eyebrows. The short
red lips were full and curved, while the
mother's lips were dangerously thin and
straight. As the architect looked at the
girl, standing tall and erect at the ta-
ble, he felt that she was destined to be
of some importance. It was also plain
that she and her mother were not sym-
pathetic. When her mother spoke, the
daughter seemed to listen with the ter-
rible criticism of youth lurking in her
eyes.
A close observer would have seen,
also, that the girl had in her a capacity
for passion that the mother altogether
lacked. The woman was mildly sensu-
ous and physical in mood, but totally
without the strong emotions that might
sweep her to any act, mindless of fate.
When the clash came between the two,
the mother would be the one to retreat.
" Have you had your ride, dear ? "
Mrs. Phillips asked in soothing tones,
carefully prepared for the public.
" No, mamma. Uncle Harry was
here, you know." ';'i •
" I am sorry not to have you take
your ride every day, no matter what
happens," the mother continued, as if
she had not heard the girl's excuse.
" I had rather see uncle Harry. Be-
sides, Frolic went lame yesterday."
"You can always take my horse,"
Mrs. Phillips persisted, her eyebrows
contracting as they had over the money
question.
A look of what some day might be-
come contempt shadowed the girl's face.
She bowed to the architect in a way that
made him understand it was no recom-
mendation to her favor that he was her
mother's friend, and walked across the
room with a dignity beyond the older wo-
man's power.
" She is at the difficult age," the mo-
ther murmured.
" She is growing' beautiful ! " Hart
exclaimed.
" I hope so," Mrs. Phillips answered
composedly. " When can you let me
see the sketches ? Won't you dine with
us next Wednesday ? "
She seemed to have arranged every
detail with accuracy and care.
VII.
The Spellmans lived on the other side
of the city from Mrs. Phillips, on Maple
Street, very near the lake. Their lit-
tle stone-front, Gothic-faced house was
pretty nearly all the tangible property
that Mr. Spellman had to leave to his
widow and child when he died, sixteen
years before. There had been also his
interest in Jackson's Bridge Works, an
interest which at the time was largely
speculative, but which had enabled Pow-
ers Jackson to pay the widow a liberal
income without hurting her pride.
The house had remained very much
what it had been during Mr. Spellman's
lifetime, its bright Brussels carpets and
black-walnut furniture having taken on
the respectability of age and use. Here,
in this homely eddy of the great city,
mother and daughter were seated read-
ing after their early dinner, as was their
custom. Helen, having shown no apti-
tude for society, after one or two seasons
of playing the wall-flower at the modest
parties of their acquaintance, had reso-
lutely sought her own interests in life.
One of these was a very earnest attempt
to get that vague thing called an edu-
cation. Just at present, this consisted
of much reading of a sociological charac-
ter.
214
The Common Lot.
Mrs. Spellman, who had been turning
the leaves of a magazine, finally looked
up from its pages and asked, " Have you
seen Jackson since the funeral ? "
Helen dropped her book into her lap
and looked at her mother with startled
eyes.
" No, mother. I suppose he is very
busy."
She spoke as if she had already asked
herself this question and answered it
without satisfaction.
" I wonder what he means to do about
the will," Mrs. Spellman continued. " It
must have been a disappointment to him.
I wonder if he had any idea how it would
be ? "
" What makes you think he would be
disappointed ? " the girl asked literally.
" Why, I saw Everett this morning,
and he told me he thought his cousin
might dispute the will. He said Jack-
son was feeling sore. It would be such
a pity if there were any trouble about
the will!"
Helen shut the book in her lap and
laid it on the table very firmly.
" How can Everett say such things !
You know Jackson would never think of
anything so — mean, so ungrateful! "
" Some people might think he was
justified. And it is a very large sum of
money. If he expected " —
" Just because uncle Powers was al-
ways so good to him ! " the girl inter-
rupted hotly. " Was that any reason
why he should give him a lot of money ? "
" My dear, most people would think it
was a sufficient reason for giving him
more than he did."
" Then most people are very self-in-
terested ! Everett Wheeler might ex-
pect it. But Jackson has something else
in life to do than worry over not getting
his uncle's money."
Mrs. Spellman, who had known Jack-
son since he was a child, smiled wisely?
but made no reply.
" What should he want more than he
has, — the chance to do splendid things,
to work for something better than money?
That 's the worst about Chicago, — you
hear nothing but money, money, from
morning to night. No one believes any
man cares for any other thing. Everett
does n't ! "
" Poor Everett ! " her mother said with
quiet irony. " He is n't thinking of con-
testing the will, however."
"Nor is Jackson, I know," the girl
answered positively.
She rose from her chair by the lamp,
and walked to and fro in the room.
When she stood she was a tall woman,
almost large, showing the growth that
the New England stock can assume in a
favorable environment. While she read,
her features had been quite dull. They
were fired now with feeling, and the deep
eyes burned.
Suddenly Mrs. Spellman remarked,
" Why should n't we go away, to Eu-
rope ? Would n't you like to spend a
year abroad ? "
" Why ? " the girl demanded quickly,
pausing opposite her mother. " What
makes you say that ? "
" There is n't much to keep us here,"
Mrs. Spellman explained.
The girl turned away her face, as she
answered evasively, " Why should we
go away ? I don't want to leave."
She knew that her mother was think-
ing of what had occurred to her many
times as these last days had gone by
without their seeing the young architect.
Possibly, now that he knew himself to
be without fortune, he wished to show
her that there could be no question of
marriage between them. She rejected
the idea haughtily. And even if it were
so, she would not admit to herself the
wound. It would be no pleasure for her
to go away.
Could it be true that he was thinking
of fighting the will ? Her heart scorned
the suggestion. She returned to her
chair, resolutely picked up her book, and
turned the pages with a methodical, un-
seeing regularity. As the clock tinkled
The Common Lot.
215
off nine strokes, Mrs. Spellman rose,
kissed her daughter, silently pressing her
fingers on the light folds of her hair, and
went upstairs to her room. Another half
hour went by ; then, as the clock struck
the hour, the doorbell rang. Helen, recol-
lecting that the servants had probably
left the kitchen, put down her book and
stepped into the hall. She waited a mo-
ment there, but when the bell rang a
second time she went resolutely to the
door and opened it.
" Oh ! " she exclaimed. " Jackson !
I thought it might be a tramp."
" You are n't so far wrong," the archi-
tect answered with a laugh. " Is it too
late to come in ? "
For answer she held the door wide
open.
" I have been dining with Mrs. Phil-
lips ; she has asked me to draw some
plans for her," Hart explained. " I
thought I would tell you and your mo-
ther about it."
" Mother has gone upstairs, but come
in. You know I read late. And I am
so glad to hear about the plans."
The strong night wind brushed bois-
terously through the open door, ruffling
the girl's loosely coiled hair. She put
her hands to her head to tighten the
hairpins here and there. If the man
could have read colors in the dark hall,
he would have seen that the girl's face,
usually too pale, had flushed. His ears
were quick enough to detect the tremu-
lous note in her voice, the touch of sur-
prise and sudden feeling. It answered
something electric in himself, something
that had driven him across the city
straightway from Mrs. Phillips's house.
He followed her into the circle of
lamplight, and sat down heavily in the
chair that she had been occupying.
" What 's this thing you are reading ? "
he asked in his usual tone of authority,
picking up the bulky volume beneath
the lamp. " Hobson's Social Problem.
Where did you get hold of that ? It 's
a queer thing for a girl, is n't it ? "
His tolerantly amused tone indicated
the value he put on women's education.
" Professor Sturges recommended it."
" Una," he commented, turning over
the leaves critically.
" But tell me about Mrs. Phillips and
the plans."
There was an awkward constraint be-
tween them, not that the hour or the
circumstance of their being alone made
them self-conscious. There was nothing
unusual in his coming late like this.
But many things had happened since
they had been together alone : the old
man's death, the funeral, the will, —
most of all the will !
He told her of the new house in For-
est Park. It had been decided upon
that evening, his plans having been re-
ceived enthusiastically. But he lacked
all interest in it. He was thinking how
the week had changed everything be-
tween them. Because of that he had not
been to see her before, and he felt guilty
in being here now.
" Mother and I have just been talking
of you. We have n't seen you since the
funeral," Helen said, speaking what was
in her mind.
Her words carried no reproach. Yet
at once he felt that he was put on the
defensive ; he did not care to explain
why he had avoided the Maple Street
house.
" A lot has happened," he replied
vaguely. " Things have changed pretty
completely for me ! "
A tone of bitterness crept into his
voice in spite of himself. He wanted
sympathy ; for that, in part, he had come
to her. At the same time he felt that
it was a weak thing to do, that he should
have gone almost anywhere but to her.
" It takes a man a few days to catch
his breath," he continued, " when he
finds he 's been cut off with a shilling,
as they say in the play."
Her eyes dropped from his face, and
her hands began to move restlessly over
the folds of her skirt.
216
The Common Lot.
" I 've had a lot to think about — to
look at the future in a new way. There 's
no hope now of leaving this place, thanks
to uncle ! "
" Oh ! " she exclaimed in a low voice.
The coldness of her tone was not lost
upon the man. He saw suddenly that
it would not do to admit to her that
he contemplated contesting his uncle's
will.
" Of course," he hastened to add mag-
nanimously, " uncle had a perfect right to
do as he liked. It was his money. But
what could he have had against me? "
" Why, nothing, I am sure ! " she an-
swered quickly.
" It looks as if he had ! "
" Perhaps he thought it was better
so, — better for you," she suggested gen-
tly. " He used to say that the men of
his time had more in their lives than
men have nowadays, because they had to
make all the fight for themselves. Now-
adays so many young men inherit capital.
He thought there were two great gifts
in life, — health and education. When a
man had those, he could go out to meet
the future bravely."
" Yes, I know all that," he hastened
to say. " But the world is n't running
on just the same lines it was when uncle
Powers was working at the forge. It 's
a longer road up these days."
" Is it ? " the girl asked vaguely. Then
they were silent once more.
There was nothing of reproof in her
words, yet he felt the strange difference
in the atmosphere of this faded little
Maple Street house from the world he
had been living in. He had told himself
for the last ten days that now he could not
marry this woman, that a great and per-
fectly obvious barrier had been raised
by his disinheritance. It had all been
so clear to him that he had not questioned
the idea.
That very evening he had had more
talk about the will with the clever Mrs.
Phillips, and he had come away from
her resolved to contest the instrument.
On the morrow he intended to notify his
cousin and take the preliminary steps.
Yet, on the very heels of that decision,
there had come an irresistible desire to
see this other woman, the longing for
the antithesis which so often besets the
feeble human will. Nothing was more
unlike Mrs. Phillips in his horizon than
this direct, inexperienced girl, full of
pure enthusiasms.
Now he saw very clearly that nothing
would remove him farther from Helen
than the act he was contemplating. If
she but knew his intention, she would
scorn him forever ! He had lost her
somehow, either way, he kept saying to
himself, as he sat there trying to think
calmly. He put another black mark
against his uncle's memory !
He had never cared to be near her
so much as now. Every soreness and
weakness of his spirit seemed to call out
for her strong, capable hand. Even the
sensuous Mrs. Phillips, by some subtle
crossing of the psychological wires, had
driven him to this plain girl, with the
honest eyes and unimpassioned bosom.
So also had the contractor and the men
at his club. In fact, his world had
conspired to set him down here, before
the one who alone knew nothing of its
logic !
" You have n't said anything about
the school," Helen remarked after a
time. "Aren't you glad!" she ex-
claimed, in the need of her spirit to know
him to be as generous as she thought him.
" It was so big, so large-hearted of him !
Especially after all the bitter things the
papers had said about him, — to give
everything he had made, the whole work
of his life, to help the people and the very
ones who had so often misunderstood him
and tried to hurt him. He was great
enough to forget the strikes and the riots,
and their shooting at him ! He forgave
them. He saw why they erred, and he
wanted to lift them out of their hate and
their ignorance. He wanted to make
their lives happier and better ! Were n't
The Common Lot.
217
you glad ? Was n't it a splendid answer
to his enemies ? "
The warmth of her feeling lent her
quiet face glow and beauty. She spoke
fast, but in a distinct, low voice. It
had a note of appeal in it, coming from
her desire to rouse the man. For the
moment she succeeded. He was ashamed
to be unworthy in her eyes.
" Why, yes," he admitted ; " as you
put; it, it seems fine. But I don't feel
sure that I admire an old man's philan-
thropies, though. He does n't want the
money any longer, — that 's a sure thing !
So he chucks it into one big scheme or an-
other that 's likely to bring him a lot of
fame. Uncle Powers was sharp enough
in gathering his dollars, and in keeping
'em too " —
" Oh ! How can you say that ! Don't,"
the girl implored, looking at him with
troubled eyes.
If she had had much experience of men
and things, she would have understood
the architect's attitude long before this.
But added to her inexperience was her
persistent need of soul to see those she
loved large and generous.
" Well," Hart resumed, less confident-
ly, " I did n't mean any disrespect to the
old man. It 's only the oldest law of life
that he lived up to. And I guess he
meant to have me learn that law as fast
as I can. You 've got to fight for what
you want in this world, and fight hard,
and fight all the time. And there is n't
much room for sentiment and fine ideas
and philanthropy until you are old, and
have earned your pile, and done your
neighbor out of his in the process."
She was silent, and he continued, will-
ing to let her see some of the harder,
baser reaches of his mind : —
" It 's just the same way with art.
It 's only good when it succeeds. It
does n't live unless it can succeed. I see
that now ! Chicago has taught me that
in two years. I 'm going to open my own
shop pretty soon and look for trade.
That 's what uncle wanted. If I get
some big commissions, and put up a lot of
skyscrapers or mills, why, I shall have
won out. What does any one care for
the kind of work you do ? It 's the price
it brings every time ! "
" Don't say that ! Please, please don't
talk that way, so bitterly."
There was real pain in her voice, and
her eyes were filmed with incipient tears.
He leaned forward in his low chair and
asked impetuously, " Why do you say
that? Why do you care what I say ? "
Her lips trembled ; she looked at him
piteously for a moment, as if to beg him
not to force her to confess more openly
how he had hurt her, how much she
could be hurt by seeing in him the least
touch of baseness. She rose, without
knowing what she did, with an uncon-
scious instinct of flight. She twisted her
hands nervously, facing him, as he rose,
too, with her misty, honest eyes.
" Tell me ! " he whispered. " Do you
care ? "
" Don't," she moaned inarticulately,
seeking in her whirling brain for some
defense against the man.
They hung there, like this, for the
space of several seconds, their hearts
beating furiously, caught in a sudden
wave of emotion, which drew them in-
exorably closer, against their reason and
their will ; which mastered their natures
without regard for their feeble human
purpose. . . .
He drew her to him and kissed her.
She murmured in the same weak, de-
fenseless tone as before, — " Don't, not
yet."
But she gave herself quite unreserv-
edly to his strong arms. She gave her-
self with all the perfect self-f orgetf ulness
of an absolutely pure woman who loves
and is glad. The little thoughts of self
were forgotten, the preconceptions of her
training. She was glad to give, to give
all in the joy of giving to him !
The man, having thus done what his
reason had counseled him for the past
218 Candlemas.
week not to do, what he would have said He had committed himself to a very
an hour before was impossible for him difficult future by engaging himself to a
to do, came out of the great whelming poor woman and struggling upwards in
wave of feeling, and found himself alone real poverty, instead of taking the de-
upon the dark city street under the tran- cencies of a comfortable bachelorhood,
quil canopy of the city smoke. His whole But there was something inspiring in
being was at rest with the purification of what had happened, something strange-
strong passion, at rest and at peace, with ly electrifying to his nerves. He had
that wonderful sense of poise, of Tightness stooped and caught the masculine burden
about one's self, which comes when pas- of the race, but he felt his feet a-tingle
sion is perfect and touches the whole soul, for the road before him. And, best of
The fret about his affairs and his uncle's all, in his heart there was reverence for
will, in which he had lived for the past that unknown woman who had kissed
week, had vanished with the touch of her him and taken him to her — for al-
lips. ways.
Robert Herrick.
(To be continued.)
CANDLEMAS.
THE hedge-rows cast a shallow shade
Upon the frozen grass,
But skies at evensong are soft,
And comes the Candlemas.
Each day a little later now
Lingers the westering sun ;
Far out of sight the miracles
Of April are begun.
O barren bough ! O frozen field !
Hopeless ye wait no more.
Life keeps her dearest promises —
The Spring is at the door !
Arthur Ketchum.
A Basket of
219
A BASKET OF CHIPS.
IN the season when trees are bare and
grass is brown the varied blossoms and
bird songs are but a memory, or, if
the mind be prophetic rather than re-
trospective, an anticipation. True, a few
days of unusual mildness may induce a
modest chickweed or veronica to open a
sleepy eye here and there, particularly
in the more protected park or lawn of
the city, or a song sparrow or Carolina
wren, or perhaps a tufted titmouse, mead-
ow lark, or even a cardinal, to try its
voice ; but these are straggling and in-
cidental occurrences that merely serve
to accentuate the general emptiness of
winter.
Still, though the musical spirit may be
dormant or fled to another clime, the
woods and fields are not absolutely silent.
For the birds are not limited vocally to
those aesthetic utterances that bring us
so much delight. Many are the notes at
their command, expressive of other emo-
tions than the pure love of music, which
so palpably governs them in their sing-
ing. Surprise, anxiety, alarm, content-
ment, happiness, — these and other states,
doubtless, have their appropriate utter-
ances. Mere chattering, for companion-
ship's sake, may be heard, too. Often,
as it seems, a mere habit — as though
a human were to hum unconsciously to
himself without reference to mental state
or occupation — is the only cause of
some of the little notes or phrases that
thinly clothe the wintry woods.
It is, therefore, worth while sometimes
to take a winter's walk and gather a few
of these " chips," as most of them are
called. They may be drier and colder
than the full-clad tree of song from which
they are cut, but they have much power
for warmth to the spirit, and the pursuit
is full of interest.
Strictly speaking, such birds as king-
lets, chickadees, and wrens do not chip ;
but then, very strictly speaking, neither
do sparrows, — not even chipping spar-
rows, — so we need not balk at the term.
It must be confessed, too, that if we
listen very closely, the chickadee 1 does
not utter his name as he roves singly or
in a merry band through the trees, glean-
ing such sustenance as the season permits.
His common phrase, which has been thus
anglicized, consists of two kinds of utter-
ances, — a high note of a somewhat thick
soprano quality, and a series of low
notes, often very musical in tone. These
low notes are very peculiar. They vary
in pitch, apparently with the varying
stress with which they are uttered, but
by breaks, instead of gradually. The
first I ever listened to attentively were
confined to the three notes of the first
inversion of the chord of D minor,
passing irregularly from each to the next
above or below. For a while I heard
these same notes in the dee part of each
chick-a^dee that I noted closely, and con-
cluded that it was likely that all the dee
notes were similarly constructed, and
that this probably accounted for the
mournful tinge that attaches to this ut-
terance despite its sprightliness. But I
subsequently heard tones of other pitch
that upset my supposed fact and its corol-
lary, the major triad of F
being among the chords represented.
Chickadee has also a very high, fine
note, which he has, perhaps, borrowed
from, or lent to, the kinglet, and which
1 The chickadee referred to in this article is
the Carolina chickadee, which is very abundant
about Washington, particularly in winter.
220
A Basket of Chips.
may often be heard from the trees
through which he is passing. This note,
which is much higher than his chick note,
he commonly uses as a preface to the
clear notes of his song. He is also fond
of introducing his dee note into his songs,
giving an effect somewhat suggestive of
the vocal efforts of the red-winged black-
bird. Only last Christmas eve I heard
this incongruous mixture as a chickadee
flitted over a partly frozen stream. I also
heard from the same bird a very clear,
pretty song consisting of treble B flat,
a second B flat an octave higher (the
kinglet note), and treble G. This song
8va. loco.
really has no more place in the present
article than a flower would have had in
the basket of Christmas greens I was
gathering at the time ; still, had I met
with a flower during my quest it would
probably have gone into my basket.
Our bright little friend with attractive
garb and unfailing good spirits is a so-
ciable youngster, fearless of man, and on
excellent terms with his avian neighbors,
through constant association with which
he has become a very good linguist, and
so is able to express himself to several
of his associates in their own languages.
Sometimes he utters a quacking chip like
that of the English sparrow ; certain of
his notes suggest a speaking acquain-
tance with the house wren ; and very fre-
quently he may be heard reproducing
the phffibe's song, though without the
phffibe's silvery quality of voice. Anent
the last a word of explanation is nec-
essary. When Thoreau wrote of the
" phoebe note " of the chickadee he prob-
ably had in mind the two long, clear
whistles often uttered by the Northern
chickadee ; and these two tones have
been referred to by other writers since
as the phrebe note of the chickadee.
But the chickadee of the South has an-
other utterance, one of his various calls
— not a song — in which he imitates
almost perfectly, though with coarser,
harsher tone, the phce-be' which an-
nounces the spring arrival of the earli-
est flycatcher. This is more properly
entitled to be called his phcebe note.
Sometimes he mixes this with his chick-
a-dee, producing a combination somewhat
like chick-er-a-be1 .
I cannot interpret these varied frag-
ments of sounds other than as notes of
content, sociable chattering, or semi-con-
scious utterances of habit, with a sec-
ondary object — or maybe it is primary
— of serving to keep united the jolly lit-
tle bands that go a-roving through the
woods. That none are expressive of dis-
agreeable emotions I am confident ; for
never have I seen the chickadee disturbed
by fear or anger.
The tufted titmouse, in passing like the
chickadee through the woods in a forag-
ing band, makes his presence manifest
by notes that are very suggestive of the
chick-a-dee of his cousin, — that is, when
the band is in a noisy mood, for fre-
quently only the first of the dual notes
is heard. The full utterance usually con-
sists of a high note, followed by sever-
al slightly upward gliding chest notes,
bringing to mind a brood of young pigs.
A lively crew it is that goes by, — flit-
ting from tree to tree by a route laid out
by some avian geographer or surveyor.
Each voyager hastily snatches a bit from
a limb, and hurries on with it to join his
companions, fearful lest the strenuous
pace (quite as needless in their case as in
that of humanity) should cause it to be
left behind, should it linger to select or
enjoy a choice morsel ; and each, all the
while, calls to his mates his tse-day-day-
day. As they pass they fill the trees
before us with life, and for some distance
the stir of their presence is yet to be per-
ceived. When, however, as often oc-
curs, the chest notes are omitted, there is
merely an unobtrusive sound of icy tin-
kles, as though a few minute icicles were
suspended and lightly clinked together.
A Basket of Chips.
221
This double-register utterance consti-
tutes the characteristic conversational or
call note of the tufted titmice, by means
of which, probably, they come or keep
together, but it does not exhaust their
vocabulary. Indeed, I am strongly in-
clined to believe that if any species of
bird be studied carefully, it will be found
to have many unsuspected little quips
and quirks of conversation. The fact
that it is impossible to write the song
of any species, because of individual va-
riety, is becoming well known ; and it
seems probable that much of the same
individuality is to be found in the chips
and calls. And why should not the wild
birds have something of the variety of ar-
ticulations possessed by domestic fowls,
— a slighter, earlier manifestation of
man's articulatory powers ? It never
surprises me when I hear a familiar bird
utter a strange note ; nor am I inclined
to question another's record of a song or
call that has no correspondence with my
own recorded experience.
Hence, when on a day of mid-May I
heard a peculiar cry, which may be in-
terpreted (as well as syllables will per-
mit) ts-yanh', the last syllable very nasal
and with a metallic ring, and traced the
unusual woodland sound to a tufted tit-
mouse in a neighboring tree, it seemed
quite natural that I should thus have
stumbled upon a word of the titmouse
language that I had not happened to hear
before.
Nor was I surprised at another time,
early in spring, to hear from a tufted
titmouse another utterance that was new
to me. This could hardly be called a
word or call, but was probably intended
for a musical performance designed to
form an important factor in the court-
ship then in progress. The bird —
doubtless a male — perched on a twig in
some brush, was stooping with elevated
and rapidly quivering wings, uttering a
high-pitched, bell -like, vibratory note,
very attractive to my ear, as, I have no
doubt, it was also to that of his lady-love.
The usual note of the white-breasted
nuthatch has been written yank and
hank. My own observation would lead
me to adopt the second of these terms as
most closely representing the sound, but
with the substitution of an h for the k,
and with the explanation that the n re-
presents nearly the sound of the French
nasal, so that the call is a close rhyme
for vin. When I first heard the call it
suggested to my mind an old woman say-
ing querulously, " Hanh, hanh ? " But
whether the tone of the first nuthatch I
met was particularly light and uncertain,
or whether the first impression has been
altered by familiarity, there is now to
my ears a sturdier ring to the note. It
has a muffled quality, also, as though the
bird were carrying in its mouth the nut
it is designing to hatch. Sometimes it
suggests one of the notes of a distant
crow or the subdued chimp of a song
sparrow. Again I imagine it to resemble
a note from a far-off bluebird. There is
a ventriloquial effect to it that seems to
separate it from that little bluish bird
that is so carefully inspecting the bark
of the tree in the foreground.
Much has been said of the propensity
of the nuthatch to progress head up or
down indifferently, but his tendency is
generally upward, though he does not
hesitate to reverse his position for con-
venience' sake. Nor is he peculiar in
the latter regard, as is supposed by many
observers. I have seen the brown creeper
move a short distance down a tree trunk
with his tail pointed toward the zenith,
and I am a competent witness to a some-
what related feat on the part of a downy
woodpecker that was on the under side
of a horizontal limb, and dropped off with
his back toward the ground, but righted
himself by an aerial somersault before he
had fallen a foot.
The mention of the downy woodpecker
floods my mind with memories. I never
before fully realized how thoroughly the
little elf is identified with my rambles
through the separate domains of Nature,
222
A Basket of Chips.
— how many doors of my storehouse are
ready to fly open at the sound of his
strident voice. A sturdy, solitary, inde-
pendent descendant of Thor, pursuing
his own way up or down the tree trunk,
hammering persistently at the end of
a broken limb, or resting quietly after
meals composedly making his toilet, —
all the while utterly unmoved by the
many alarms that perhaps send com-
posite bands of tree and song sparrows,
j uncos, goldfinches, and other birds, from
the field where they are feeding to seek
shelter in his tree. I admire his isola-
tion and independence as I admire the
chickadee's good-fellowship and sociabil-
ity ; and though the harsh call that tells
of his presence, and the clattering, scram-
bling descent of the gamut, his nearest
approach to a song, have little of musical
beauty, they are such sounds as pro-
perly harmonize with his cynical philoso-
phy. How many days of solitary, un-
disturbed commingling with Nature are
bound up in those jagged-edged tones ! —
Days spent in the heart of the wilderness,
though but a few minutes' walk from
my home in the suburbs of Washington ;
for the wilderness is not measured by
miles, and he who seeks it in the right
spirit will always find its heart. It needs
not a railroad journey across a conti-
nent to enjoy the charm of the primeval
forest. It often requires but the brief-
est walk to step into a domain where
epoch and race no longer exist, — an-
other world where a spell of enchantment
seizes and enthralls us. We belong to
no country, no age. Our identity falls
from us like a discarded mantle, and we
blend with our environment.
" I steal
From all I may be, or have been before,
To mingle with the universe."
In the world we have left we are tied
by a million bonds to a particular spot
on the earth's surface, to a particular
point in the earth's history, but here, in
the land of woodpeckers and titmice,
there is no such bondage, and we roam
free and untrammeled. This little purl-
ing brook, this lichen-covered rock, these
massive oaks and beeches, these dark,
quiet pools may belong to any one of
many ages or climes : they own no spe-
cial master. Amid their unchanged
beauties might meet on equal terms, as
tenants, the savage of a prehistoric era
and one of that noble race that shall in-
herit the earth when the present era shall
have passed into the dark gloom of bar-
barism. We are in the presence of an
eternal Now, and for the hour are one
with it. Our occupation, even though it
be but the gathering of chips, is trans-
formed by its touch into a pursuit of
prime importance, to which we may lend
ourselves zealously without compromise
of dignity. In fact,, it must be confessed,
the little local issues of ephemeral poli-
tics, shifting commercial and industrial
systems, fluctuating empires, varying re-
ligions, which have such prominence in
that remote world we have left, seem
petty and ignoble objects of thought
and attention in the majestic presence of
this world of immutability we have en-
tered.
To return to our birds, — the white-
breasted nuthatch has a Canadian cousin
that spends the winter with us, whose
breast is red, instead of white ; a trim
little sprite, that seems designed for a
perpetual example of staccato. He darts
about in a series of quick, short jerks,
uttering all the while a little pit-pit-pit-
pit-pit, of very light notes, suggestive of
dripping water. These notes he some-
times expands into a hanh-hanh closely
resembling that uttered by his cousin,
but distinguished by a brassier sound,
that recalls the tones of the tiny toy
trumpet whose music used to delight our
childish ears for a full hour of a Christ-
mas morning.
The first red-breasted nuthatch of my
acquaintance gave me a surprise : he flew
down to a stream to drink, and, as he
lifted his bill skyward and chewed the
water, after the peculiar manner of birds,.
A Basket of Chips.
223
he uttered a funny little series of faint,
spueaky notes that suggested the thought
that the delicate machinery of his throat
needed oiling. The purpose, if any, of
these notes was not apparent.
One would think that the nuthatch
method of earning a living would cause
nearsightedness. Constantly and actively
moving up or down the trunks and limbs
of trees, with the focus of the gaze only
an inch or two from the eyes, these birds
might well be excused if objects a few
feet away were but a blurred mass. Yet
I have seen the red-breasted nuthatch
dart out twenty feet from the limb on
which he sat preening his feathers and
capture a flying insect. The eyesight
of birds and other creatures, however,
teaches us to be cautious in judging oth-
ers by ourselves. To say nothing of the
eagle gazing at the sun without blink-
ing, or the hawk on the top of a tall
tree descrying the grasshopper in the
meadow grass, we must remember that
the eyes of birds are set so far back in the
head that they cannot come to a focus ;
they must either see double or use only
one eye at a time. Still further are we
removed from the certain and proved
ground of experience if we descend to
the fish, whose eyes stare simultaneous-
ly in opposite directions. And when, as
in the case of the flounder and others,
each eye can be projected slightly and
turned backward and forward indepen-
dently of what, according to our experi-
ence, ought to be its mate, we can but
focus our own interdependent eyes upon
the peculiar creature in a helpless stare.
The brown creeper, like the nut-
hatches, looks at his food at close range.
Clinging even more closely than they to
the tree trunk, he progresses upward in
the same jerky fashion, seeking his prey
in the crevices of the bark, and uttering
the while faint, high-pitched, and elusive
notes. Usually his presence in the vicin-
ity is indicated by a constantly repeated
note that should be marked on a minia-
ture staff with the point of a needle ;
though this is often replaced by a silvery,
tremulous trill that might be a section
cut from the reduced song of a chipping
sparrow. Again, when flying from the
upper part of one tree trunk to the base
of another, he frequently transmits to
the bird world a musical telegram, in
which only such characters are used as
c, e, h, i, and others that are represented
solely by dots.
The chips thus far collected have been
gathered in the woods, the usual place
to pick up chips, it is true, but by no
means the only one, particularly in the
case of birds. Out in the brown meadow
or idle winter field, where grasses and
weeds furnish a full supply of provender
to those birds whose bills are adapted to
the fare they offer, are many more, blown
about by the wind, perhaps, but easy to
gather for our basket.
Here, close to protecting cover, — a
bushy brook, or the edge of a wood, or,
perhaps, a tangle of blackberry and
brier, — we shall find many a motley
throng of birds banded together by the
gregarious spirit, rather than by commu-
nity of interest, busily attacking the crop
that the farmer can best spare. There
may have been a heavy fall of snow,
and only the tallest of the plants that re-
tain their seeds through the season, such
as amaranth and broom-sedge, are with-
in reach ; yet bountiful meals may still
be had, and the enforced diet but gives
greater zest to the variety attainable
when the white cover has been removed.
But howsoever limited the choice of
food, there is abundant variety in the
notes that besprinkle the frosty air.
There are the long-drawn, tremulous
tseets of the white-throated sparrows ; the
dry chips of the song sparrows, replaced
by louder, more resonant chimps when
danger seems nigh ; the goldfinches'
light, staccato notes, uttered in groups
of four or five with a tendency to rise at
the end, and once in a while giving way
to a sweet, sympathetic ah-ee, that sug-
gests the idea of a most musical yawn ;
224
A Basket of Chips.
and, perhaps, an occasional note from one
or two big, overgrown fox sparrows that
have lingered thus far .north, either a
high, chirpy chip or a tseet very much
like that of the whitethroats. And un-
derlying all, leaving no interstices, are
the many bits of sound contributed to
the general chorus by the loquacious tree
sparrows and juncos. The former fill
the air with liquid splinters, each of
which sounds like a nasal e-lick', and
which have t been aptly likened to the
clink of a tiny stone chisel ; the juncos,
true genii of winter in this latitude, are a
well-equipped battery of wintry notes, —
icy tinklings, electric snappings, and pe-
culiar muffled tones, such as accompany
a stone skipping over a frozen pond.
It may be that in the cover to which
these birds are making frequent trips
en masse to escape a real or more often
imaginary hawk, or other bugaboo, there
is a cardinal. If so, it is easy to detect
his loud, commanding clink above the
twittering uproar of the frightened mob.
Or we may hear from him a peculiar ut-
terance, — a series of percussive notes,
to -to -to -to- to, followed by a whirring
sound that recalls the drum roll some-
times made by a horse with his lips.
It is, perhaps, from frequent associa-
tion with the cardinal that the juncos have
acquired a to-to-to that is the cardinal's
own on a smaller scale, and that is often
used by them as the expression of some
emotion incident to their winter's sojourn
in the South. Their commonest note,
however, is the little crystalline tinkle.
This bit of frosty music characterizes
every winter ramble ; for the juncos have
appropriated our season of bare woods
and fields and made it their own. Go
where you will, the juncos, with their
clean, neutral wintry colors, are there
before you. That walk must indeed be
barren of birds that does not yield sight
or sound of at least one of these spirits of
snow and ice. Sometimes I have come
upon an immense flock of them in a cor-
ner of a pine wood, — for they are ubi-
quitous, and are as likely to be found in
dense woods as in the open, — splitting
its silence into tiny slivers with their mul-
titudinous snappings and tinklings.
What trim little birds they are ! And
how demure their Quaker garb ! They
seem to have been colored by the same
artist that painted the field of snow and
the gray sky that meets it at the horizon.
I am glad we do not have them with us
in summer, for they belong so wholly
to the winter.
But this last supply of chips has quite
filled our small basket, and we must de-
fer the gathering of more to that future
day that may or may not dawn. A
pleasant and profitable expedition it has
been, for we have filled our souls as we
have filled our basket, and have breathed
the tonic air of purity and peace. Our
spiritual lungs will be better able to resist
the miasmatic atmosphere of the world to
which we must return, — a world whose
responsibilities and duties we cannot shirk,
if we would, but can only leave behind
for a brief respite.
Yet, as we make our way from world
to world, let us linger a moment to note
this band of cedar birds resting motion-
less in the top of a tall tree, and seem-
ingly all unconscious of the whining tone
of a single pitch that oozes from their
many throats. We have not yet passed
the confines of this land of loitering, and
may stop to listen and see without fear
of reproach.
How still they are ! Has not some
whimsical taxidermist passed this way
and filled the tree with samples of his
skill ? It is hard to believe that these
sleek, fawn-colored bodies, rigid and up-
right, and that penetrating tone of com-
plaint, are in any way related. The
sound seems like a dog's whine, disem-
bodied, and hovering for the moment
above our heads. Only for the moment,
for at some imperceptible signal the en-
tire flock has suddenly risen with a single
movement, and is on its way to a distant
Fra Paolo Sarpi.
225
tree to hold another solemn meeting in a
different part of the field.
And now we, too, must be going.
Bidding farewell to this land of eternity,
we must step across the boundaries into
the region where time and locality gov-
ern, and resume our trivial duties, tem-
porarily abandoned, of guiding the Ship
of State and making a living.
Henry Oldys.
FRA PAOLO SARPI.
II.
THE Venetian Republic showed it-
self duly grateful to Sarpi. The Sen-
ate offered him splendid presents and
entitled him " Theologian of Venice."
The presents he refused, but the title
with its duty, which was mainly to
guard the Republic against the en-
croachments of the Vatican, he accept-
ed, and his life in the monastery of
Santa Fosca went on quietly, simply,
laboriously, as before. The hatred now
felt for him at Rome was unbounded.
It corresponded to the gratitude at
Venice. Every one saw his danger, and
he well knew it. Potentates were then
wont to send assassins on long errands,
and the arm of the Vatican was espe-
cially far-reaching and merciless. It
was the period when Pius V, the Pope
whom the Church afterwards proclaimed
a saint, commissioned an assassin to
murder Queen Elizabeth.1
But there was in Father Paul a trust
in Providence akin to fatalism. Again
and again he was warned, and among
those who are said to have advised him
to be on his guard against papal assas-
sins was no less a personage than his
greatest controversial enemy, — Cardi-
nal Bellarmine. It was believed by
Sarpi's friends that Bellarmine's Scotch
1 This statement formerly led to violent de-
nials by ultramontane champions ; but in 1870
it was made by Lord Acton, a Roman Catholic,
one of the most learned of modern historians,
and when it was angrily denied, he quietly cited
the official life of Pope Pius in the Acta Sanc-
VOL. xcin. — NO. 556. 15
ideas of duty to humanity prevailed over
his Roman ideas of fealty to the Vati-
can, and we may rejoice in the hope that
his nobler qualities did really assert
themselves against the casuistry of his
brother prelates which sanctioned assas-
sination.
These warnings were soon seen to be
well founded. On a pleasant evening
in October, 1607, a carefully laid trap
was sprung. Returning from his day's
work at the Ducal Palace, Father Paul,
just as he had crossed the little bridge
of Santa Fosca before reaching his con-
vent, was met by five assassins. Two
of his usual attendants had been drawn
off by the outburst of a fire in the neigh-
borhood ; the other two were old men
who proved useless. The place was well
chosen. The descent from the bridge
was so narrow that all three were obliged
to march in single file, and just at this
point these ruffians from Rome sprang
upon him in the dusk, separated him
from his companions, and gave him, in
a moment, fifteen dagger thrusts, two
in his throat and one — a fearful gash
— on the side of his head, and then,
convinced that they had killed him, es-
caped to their boats, only a few paces
distant.
The victim lingered long in the hos-
pital, but his sound constitution and
torum, published by the highest church au-
thority. This was final ; denial ceased, and the
statement is no longer questioned. For other
proofs in the line of Lord Acton's citation, see
Bellarmine's Selbstbiographie, cited in a pre-
vious article, pp. 306, et seq.
226
Fra Paolo Sarpi.
abstemious habits stood him in good
stead. Very important among the qual-
ities which restored him to health were
his optimism and cheerfulness . An early
manifestation of the first of these was
seen when, on regaining consciousness,
he called for the stiletto which had been
drawn from the main wound and, run-
ning his fingers along the blade, said
cheerily to his friends, " It is not filed. "
What this meant, any one knows who
has seen in various European collections
the daggers dating from the "ages of
faith " cunningly filed or grooved to hold
poison. l
As an example of the second of these
qualities, we may take his well-known
reply when, to the surgeon dressing the
wound made by the "style " or stiletto,
— who spoke of its "extravagance,"
rudeness, and yet ineffectiveness, — Fra
Paolo quietly answered that in these
characteristics could be recognized the
style of the Roman Curia.
Meantime the assassins had found
their way back to Rome, and were wel-
comed with open arms ; but it is some
comfort to know that later, when such
conscience as there was throughout Italy
and Europe showed intense disgust at
the proceeding, the Roman Court treat-
ed them coldly and even severely.
The Republic continued in every way
to show Sarpi its sympathy and grati-
tude. It made him many splendid offers
which he refused ; but two gifts he ac-
cepted. One was full permission to ex-
plore the Venetian archives, and the oth-
er was a little doorway, cut through the
garden wall of his monastery, enabling
him to reach his gondola without going
through the narrow and tortuous path
he had formerly taken on his daily
journey to the public offices. This
1 There is a remarkable example of a beau-
tiful dagger, grooved to contain poison, in the
imperial collection of arms at Vienna.
2 The present writer has examined with care
the spot where the attack was made, and found
that never was a scoundrelly plot better con-
ceived or more fiendishly executed. He also
humble portal still remains. Beneath
few triumphal arches has there ever
passed as great or as noble a con-
queror.2
Efforts were also made to cajole him,
— to induce him to visit Rome, with
fine promises of recognition and honor,
and with solemn assurances that no
harm should come to him ; but he was
too wise to yield. Only a few years
previously he had seen Giordano Bruno
lured to Rome and burned alive on the
Campo dei Fiori. He had seen his
friend and correspondent, Fra Fulgentio
Manfredi, yield to similar allurements
and accept a safe conduct to Rome,
which, though it solemnly guaranteed
him against harm, proved as worthless
as that of John Huss at the Council
of Constance ; the Inquisition torturing
him to death on the spot where, six
years earlier, it had burned Bruno. He
had seen his friend, the Archdeacon
Ribetti, drawn within the clutch of the
Vatican, only to die of "a most pain-
ful colic " immediately after dining with
a confidential chamberlain of the Pope,
and, had he lived a few months longer,
he would have seen his friend and con-
fidant, Antonio de Dominis, Archbishop
of Spalato, to whom he had entrusted
a copy of his most important work, en-
ticed to Rome and put to death by the
Inquisition. Though the Vatican ex-
ercised a strong fascination over its ene-
mies, against Father Paul it was pow-
erless ; he never yielded to it, but kept
the even tenor of his way.8
In the dispatches which now passed,
comedy was mingled with tragedy.
Very unctuous was the expression by
His Holiness of his apprehensions re-
garding " dangers to the salvation "
and of his "fears for the souls " of the
visited what was remaining of the convent in
April, 1902, and found the little door as ser-
viceable as when it was made.
8 A copy of Manfredi' s "safe conduct "ia
given by Castellani, Lettere Inedite di F. P. S.,
p. 12, note. Nothing could be more explicit.
Fra Paolo Sarpi.
227
Venetian Senators, if they persisted in
asserting their own control of their own
state. Hardly less touching were the
fears expressed by the good Oratorian,
Cardinal Baronius, that "a judgment
might be brought upon the Republic '-'
if it declined to let the Vatican have
its way. But these expressions were
not likely to prevail with men who had
dealt with Machiavelli.
Uncompromising as ever, Father
Paul continued to write letters and
publish treatises which clenched more
and more firmly into the mind of Ven-
ice and of Europe the political doctrine
of which he was the apostle, — the doc-
trine that the State is rightfully inde-
pendent of the Church, — and through-
out the Christian world he was recog-
nized as victor.
Nothing could exceed the bitterness
of the attacks upon him, though some
of them, at this day, provoke a smile.
While efforts were made to discredit
him among scholars by spurious writings
or by interpolations in genuine writings,
efforts equally ingenious were made to
arouse popular hostility. One of these
was a painting which represented him
writhing amid the flames of hell, with
a legend stating, as a reason for his
punishment, that he had opposed the
Holy Father.
Now it was indeed, in the midst of fe-
rocious attacks upon his reputation and
cunning attempts upon his life, that he
entered a new and most effective period
of activity. For years, as the adviser
of Venice, he had studied, both as a
historian and as a statesman, the great-
est questions which concerned his coun-
try, and especially those which related
to the persistent efforts of the Vatican
to encroach upon Venetian self-govern-
ment. The results of these studies he
had embodied in reports which had
1 For the extent to which these attacks were
carried, see the large number in the Sarpi col-
lection at the Cornell University Library, es-
pecially volume ix.
2 The old English translation of this book,
shaped the course of the Republic ; and
now, his learning and powers of thought
being brought to bear upon the policy
of Europe in general, as affected by
similar papal encroachments, he began
publishing a series of treatises, which
at once attracted general attention.1
First of these, in 1608, came his
work on the Interdict. Clearly and
concisely it revealed the nature of the
recent struggle, the baselessness of the
Vatican claims, and the solidarity of
interest between Venice and all other
European states regarding the question
therein settled. This work of his as a
historian clenched his work as a states-
man; from that day forward no nation
has even been seriously threatened with
an interdict.
Subsidiary works followed rapidly
from his pen, strengthening the civil
power against the clerical; but in 1610
came a treatise, which marked an epoch,
— his History of Ecclesiastical Bene-
fices.2 In this he dealt with a problem
which had become very serious, not only
in Venice, but in every European state,
showed the process by which vast trea-
sures had been taken from the control
of the civil power and heaped up for ec-
clesiastical pomp and intrigue, pointed
out special wrongs done by the system to
the Church as well as the State, and ad-
vocated a reform which should restore
this wealth to better uses. His argu-
ments spread widely and sank deep, not
only in Italy, but throughout Europe,
and the nineteenth century has seen
them applied effectively in every Euro-
pean country within the Roman obedi-
ence.
In 1611 he published his work on
the Inquisition at Venice, present-
ing historical arguments against the
uses which ecclesiasticism, under papal
guidance, had made of that tribunal.
published in 1736 at Westminster, is by no
means a very rare book, and it affords the gen-
eral reader perhaps the most accessible means
of understanding Fra Paolo's simplicity, thor-
oughness, and vigor.
228
Fra Paolo Sarpi.
These arguments spread far, and devel-
oped throughout Europe those views of
the Inquisition which finally led to its
destruction. Minor treatises followed,
dealing with state questions arising he-
tween the Vatican and Venice, each
treatise — thoroughly well reasoned and
convincing — having a strong effect on
the discussion of similar public questions
in every other European nation.
In 1613 came two books of a high
order, each marking an epoch. The
first of these was upon the Right of
Sanctuary, and in it Sarpi led the way,
which all modern states have followed,
out of the old, vicious system of sanc-
tioning crime by sheltering criminals.
The cogency of his argument and the
value of its application gained for him
an especial tribute by the best authority
on such questions whom Europe had
seen, — Hugo Grotius.
Closely connected with this work was
that upon the Immunity of the Clergy.
Both this and the previous work were
in the same order of ideas, and the
second fastened into the European mind
the reasons why no state can depend
upon the Church for the punishment of
clerical criminals. His argument was
a triumphant vindication of Venice in
her struggle with Paul V on this point ;
but it was more than that. It became
the practical guide of all modern states.
Its arguments dissipated the last efforts
throughout Europe to make a distinc-
tion, in criminal matters, between the
priestly caste and the world in gen-
eral.
Among lesser treatises which fol-
lowed is one which has done much to
shape modern policy regarding public
instruction. This was his book upon
the Education given by the Jesuits.
One idea which it enforced sank deep
into the minds of all thoughtful men, —
his statement that Jesuit maxims devel-
op "sons disobedient to their parents,
citizens unfaithful to their country, and
subjects undutiful to their sovereign."
Jesuit education has indeed been main-
tained, and evidences of it may be
seen in various European countries.
The traveler in Italy constantly sees in
the larger Italian towns long lines of
young men and boys, sallow, thin, and
listless, walking two and two, with
priests at each end of the coffle. These
are students taking their exercise, and
an American or Englishman marvels as
he remembers the playing fields of his
own country. Youth are thus brought
up as milksops, to be graduated as scape-
graces. The strong men who control
public affairs, who lead men and ori-
ginate measures in the open, are not
bred in Jesuit forcing-houses. Even the
Jesuits themselves have acknowledged
this, and perhaps the strongest of all
arguments supplementary to those given
by Father Paul were uttered by Padre
Curci, eminent in his day as a Jesuit
gladiator, but who realized finally the
impossibility of accomplishing great
things with men moulded by Jesuit
methods.
All these works took strong hold upon
European thought. Leading men in all
parts of Europe recognized Sarpi as both
a great statesman and a great historian.
Among his English friends were such men
as Lord Bacon and Sir Henry Wotton ;
and his praises have been sounded by
Grotius, by Gibbon, by Hallam, and by
Macaulay. Strong, lucid, these works
of Father Paul have always been espe-
cially attractive to those who rejoice
in the leadership of a master mind.
But in 1619 came the most impor-
tant of all, — a service to humanity
hardly less striking than that which he
had rendered in his battle against the
Interdict, — his history of the Council
of Trent.
His close relations to so many of the
foremost men of his day and his long
study in public archives and private
libraries bore fruit in this work, which
takes rank among the few great, endur-
ing historical treatises of the world.
Throughout, it is vigorous and witty,
but at the same time profound ; every-
Fra Paolo Sarpi.
229
where it bears evidences of truthfulness
and is pervaded by sobriety of judg-
ment. Its pictures of the efforts or
threats by representatives of various
great powers to break away from the
papacy and establish national churches ;
its presentation of the arguments of
anti-papal orators on one side and of
Laynez and his satellites on the other ;
its display of acts and revelations of
pretexts ; its penetration into the whole
network of intrigue, and its thorough
discussion of underlying principles, —
all are masterly.
Though the name of the author was
concealed in an anagram, the book was
felt, by the Vatican party, to be a blow
which only one man could have dealt,
and the worst blow which the party had
received since its author had defeated
the Interdict at Venice. Efforts were
made, by outcries and calumnies, to dis-
credit the work, and they have been con-
tinued from that day to this, but in
vain. That there must be some gaps
and many imperfections in it is certain ;
but its general character is beyond the
reach of ultramontane weapons. The
blow was felt to be so heavy that the
Jesuit Pallavicini was empowered to
write a history of the Council to coun-
terbalance it, and his work was well
done; but Ranke, the most unpreju-
diced of judges, comparing the two,
assigns the palm to Father Paul. His
book was immediately spread through-
out Europe ; but of all the translations,
perhaps the most noteworthy was the
English. Sarpi had entrusted a copy
of the original to his friend, Antonio
de Dominis, Archbishop of Spalato,
and he, having taken refuge in Eng-
land, had it translated there, the au-
thorship being ascribed on the title-page
to "Pietro Soave Polano." This Eng-
lish translation was, in vigor and pith,
worthy of the original. In it can be
discerned, as clearly as in the original,
that atmosphere of intrigue and brutal
assertion of power by which the Roman
Curia, after packing the Council with
petty Italian bishops, bade defiance to
the Catholic world. This translation,
more than all else, has enabled the
English-speaking peoples to understand
what was meant by the Italian historian
when he said that Father Paul " taught
the world how the Holy Spirit guides
the Great Councils of the Church. " It
remains cogent down to this day ; after
reading it one feels that such guidance
might equally be claimed for Tammany
Hall.
Although Father Paul never acknow-
ledged the authorship of the history of
the Council of Trent, and although his
original copy, prepared for the press,
with his latest corrections, still remains
buried in the archives at Venice, the
whole world knew that he alone could
have written it.
But during all these years, while
elaborating opinions on the weightiest
matters of state for the Venetian Sen-
ate, and sending out this series of books
which so powerfully influenced the atti-
tude of his own and after generations
toward the Vatican, he was working
with great effect in yet another field.
With the possible exception of Voltaire,
he was the most vigorous and influen-
tial letter-writer during the three hun-
dred years which separated Erasmus
from Thomas Jefferson. Voltaire cer-
tainly spread his work over a larger
field, lighted it with more wit, and
gained by it more brilliant victories ;
but as regards accurate historical know-
ledge, close acquaintance with states-
men, familiarity with the best and
worst which statesmen could do, sober
judgment and cogent argument, the
great Venetian was his superior. Cu-
riotlfcly enough, Sarpi resembles the
American statesman more closely than
either of the Europeans. Both he and
Jefferson had the intense practical in-
terest of statesmen, not only in the
welfare of their own countries, but in
all the political and religious problems
of their times. Both were keenly alive
to progress in the physical sciences,
230
Fra Paolo Sarpi.
wherever made. Both were wont to
throw a light veil of humor over very
serious discussions. Both could use,
with great effect, curt, caustic descrip-
tion: Jefferson's letter to Governor
Langdon satirizing the crowned heads
of Europe, as he had seen them, has a
worthy pendant in Fra Paolo's pictures
of sundry representatives of the Vati-
can. In both these writers was a deep
earnestness which, at times, showed it-
self in prophetic utterances. The amaz-
ing prophecy of Jefferson against Ameri-
can slavery, beginning with the words,
" I tremble when I remember that God
is just, " which, in the light of our civil
war, seems divinely inspired, is par-
alleled by some of Sarpi 's utterances
against the unmoral tendencies of Jesu-
itism and Ultramontanism ; and these
too seem divinely inspired as one reads
them in the light of what has happened
since in Spain, in Sicily, in Naples, in
Poland, in Ireland, and in sundry South
American republics.
The range of Sarpi's friendly rela-
tions was amazing. They embraced
statesmen, churchmen, scholars, scien-
tific investigators, diplomatists in every
part of Europe, and among these Gali-
leo and Lord Bacon, Grotius and Mor-
nay, Salmasius and Casaubon, De Thou
and Sir Henry Wotton, Bishop Bedell
and Vossius, with a great number of
others of nearly equal rank. Unfortu-
nately the greater part of his corre-
spondence has perished. In the two
small volumes collected by Polidori,
and in the small additional volume of
letters to Simon Contarini, Venetian
Ambassador at Rome, unearthed a few
years since in the Venetian archives by
Castellani, we have all that is known.
It is but a small fraction of his episto-
lary work, but it enables us to form a
clear opinion. The letters are well
worthy of the man who wrote the his-
tory of the Council of Trent and the
1 For this famous utterance, see notes of
conversations given by Christoph, Burggraf von
Dohna, in July, 1608, in Brief e und Acten zur
protest of Venice against the Inter-
dict.
It is true that there has been derived
from these letters, by his open enemies
on one side and his defenders of a
rather sickly conscientious sort on the
other, one charge against him : this is
based on his famous declaration, "I
utter falsehood never, but the truth not
to eveiy one." ("La falsita non dico
mai mai, ma la verita non a ogniuno. ") l
Considering his vast responsibilities
as a statesman and the terrible dan-
gers which beset him as a theologian;
that in the first of these capacities
the least misstep might wreck the great
cause which he supported, and that in
the second such a misstep might easily
bring him to the torture chamber and
the stake, normally healthful minds
will doubtless agree that the criticism
upon these words is more Pharisaic than
wholesome.
Sarpi was now spoken of, more than
ever, both among friends and foes, as
the "terribilefrate." Terrible to the
main enemies of Venice he indeed was,
and the machinations of his opponents
grew more and more serious. Efforts
to assassinate him, to poison him, to
discredit him, to lure him to Rome, or
at least within reach of the Inquisition,
became almost frantic ; but all in vain.
He still continued his quiet life at the
monastery of Santa Fosca, publishing
from time to time discussions of ques-
tions important for Venice and for Eu-
rope, working steadily in the public ser-
vice until his last hours. In spite of his
excommunication and of his friendships
with many of the most earnest Protest-
ants of Europe, he remained a son of
the church in which he was born. His
life was shaped in accordance with its
general precepts, and every day he heard
mass. So his career quietly ran on
until, in 1623, he met death calmly,
without fear, in full reliance upon the
Geschichte des Dreissigjahrigen Krieges, Mun-
chen, 1874, p. 79.
Fra Paolo Sarpi.
231
divine justice and mercy. His last
words were a prayer for Venice.
He had fought the good fight. He
had won it for Venice and for human-
ity. For all this, the Republic had, in
his later years, tried to show her grati-
tude, and he had quietly and firmly re-
fused the main gifts proposed to him.
But now came a new outburst of grate-
ful feeling. The Republic sent notice
of his death to other powers of Europe
through its Ambassadors in the terms
usual at the death of royal personages ; in
every way, it showed its appreciation of
his character and services, and it crowned
all by voting him a public monument.
Hardly was the decree known, when
the Vatican authorities sent notice that,
should any monument be erected to
Sarpi, they would anew and publicly
declare him excommunicate as a here-
tic. At this, the Venetian Senate hesi-
tated, waited, delayed. Whenever af-
terwards the idea of carrying out the
decree for the monument was revived,
there set in a storm of opposition from
Rome. Hatred of the terrible friar's
memory seemed to grow more and more
bitter. Even rest in the grave was de-
nied him. The church where he was
buried having been demolished, the ques-
tion arose as to the disposition of his
bones. To bury them in sacred ground
outside the old convent would arouse
a storm of ecclesiastical hostility, with
the certainty of their dispersion and
desecration ; it seemed impossible to se-
cure them from priestly hatred : there-
fore it was that his friends took them
from place to place, sometimes conceal-
ing them in the wall of a church here,
sometimes beneath the pavement of a
church there, and for a time keeping
them in a simple wooden box at the
Ducal Library. The place where his
remains rested became, to most Vene-
tians, unknown. All that remained to
remind the world of his work was his
portrait in the Ducal Library, showing
the great gash made by the Vatican
assassins.
Time went on, and generations came
which seemed to forget him. Still
worse, generation after generation came,
carefully trained by clerical teachers to
misunderstand and hate him. But these
teachers went too far; for, in 1771,
nearly one hundred and fifty years af-
ter his death, the monk Vaerini ga-
thered together, in a pretended bio-
graphy, all the scurrilities which could
be imagined, and endeavored to bury
the memory of the great patriot beneath
them. This was too much. The old
Venetian spirit, which had so long lain
dormant, now asserted itself: Vaerini
was imprisoned and his book suppressed.
A quarter of a century later the Re-
public fell under the rule of Austria, and
Austria's most time-honored agency in
keeping down subject populations has
always been the priesthood. Again
Father Paul's memory was virtually
proscribed, and in 1803 another desper-
ate attempt was made to cover him with
infamy. In that year appeared a book
entitled The Secret History of the Life
of Fra Paolo Sarpi, and it contained
not only his pretended biography, but
what claimed to be Sarpi 's own letters
and other documents showing him to be
an adept in scoundrelism and hypocrisy.
Its editor was the archpriest Ferrara of
Mantua ; but on the title-page appeared,
as the name of its author, Fontanini,
Archbishop of Ancira, a greatly re-
spected prelate who had died nearly
seventy years before, and there was also
stamped, not only upon the preliminary,
but upon the final page of the work, the
approval of the Austrian government.
To this was added a pious motto from
St. Augustine, and the approval of Pius
VII was distinctly implied, since the
work was never placed upon the Index,
and could not have been published at
Venice, stamped as it was and registered
with the privileges of the University,
without the consent of the Vatican.
The memory of Father Paul seemed
likely now to be overwhelmed. There
was no longer a Republic of Venice to
232
Fra Paolo Sarpi.
guard the noble traditions of his life
and service. The book was recommend-
ed and spread far and wide by preachers
and confessors.
But at last came a day of judgment.
The director of the Venetian archives
discovered and had the courage to an-
nounce that the work was a pious fraud
of the vilest type ; that it was never
written by Fontanini, but that it was
simply made up out of the old scurrilous
work of Vaerini, suppressed over thirty
years before. As to the correspondence
served up as supplementary to the bio-
graphy, it was concocted from letters
already published, with the addition of
Jesuitical interpolations and of forger-
ies.1 Now came the inevitable reaction,
and with it the inevitable increase of
hatred for Austrian rule and the in-
evitable question, how, if the Pope is the
infallible teacher of the world in all mat-
ters pertaining to faith and morals, could
he virtually approve this book, and why
did he not, by virtue of his divine iner-
rancy, detect the fraud and place its con-
demnation upon the Index. The only
lasting effect of the book, then, was to
revive the memory of Father Paul's
great deeds and to arouse Venetian
pride in them. The fearful scar on his
face in the portrait spoke more elo-
quently than ever, and so it was that,
early in the nineteenth century, many
men of influence joined in proposing a
suitable and final interment for the poor
bones, which had seven times been bur-
ied and reburied, and which had so long
been kept in the sordid box at the Ducal
Library. The one fitting place of bur-
ial was the cemetery of San Michele.
To that beautiful island, so near the
heart of Venice, had, for many years,
been borne the remains of leading Ve-
netians. There, too, in more recent days,
have been laid to rest many of other
lands widely respected and beloved.
1 For a full and fair statement of the re-
searches which exposed this pious fraud, see
Castellani, Prefect of the Library of St. Mark,
preface to his Lettere Inedite di F. P. S., p.
But the same persistent hatred which,
in our own day, grudged and delayed
due honors at the tombs of Copernicus
and Galileo among Catholics, and of
Humboldt among Protestants, was still
bitter against the great Venetian scholar
and statesman. It could not be forgot-
ten that he had wrested from the Vati-
can the most terrible of its weapons.
But patriotic pride was strong, and final-
ly a compromise was made : it was ar-
ranged that Sarpi should be buried and
honored at his burial as an eminent man
of science, and that no word should be
spoken of his main services to the Re-
public and to the world. On this condi-
tion he was buried with simple honors.
Soon, however, began another chapter
of hatred. There came a pope who add-
ed personal to official hostility. Gregory
XVI, who in his earlier days had been
abbot of the monastery of San Michele,
was indignant that the friar who had
thwarted the papacy should lie buried
in the convent which he himself had
formerly ruled, and this feeling took
shape, first, in violent speeches at Rome,
and next, in brutal acts at Venice. The
monks broke and removed the simple
stone placed over the remains of Father
Paul, and when it was replaced, they
persisted in defacing and breaking it,
and were only prevented from dragging
out his bones, dishonoring them and cast-
ing them into the lagoon, by the weight
of the massive, strong, well-anchored
sarcophagus, which the wise foresight of
his admirers had provided for them.
At three different visits to Venice, the
present writer sought the spot where
they were laid, and in vain. At the
second of these visits, he found the Pa-
triarch of Venice, under whose rule va-
rious outrages upon Sarpi 's memory
had been perpetrated, pontificating gor-
geously about the Grand Piazza ; but at
his next visit there had come a change.
xvii. For methods used in interpolating or
modifying1 passages in Sarpi's writings, see Bi-
anchi Giovini, Biografia di Sarpi, Zurigo, 1847,
vol. ii. pp. 135, et seq.
Timeo Danaos.
233
The monks had disappeared. Their in-
sults to the illustrious dead had been
stopped by laws which expelled them
from their convent, and there, little re-
moved from each other in the vestibule
and aisle of the great church, were the
tombs of Father Paul and of the late
Patriarch side by side ; the great pa-
triot's simple gravestone was now al-
lowed to rest unbroken.
Better even than this was the reaction
provoked by these outbursts of ecclesi-
astical hatred. It was felt, in Venice,
throughout Italy, and indeed through-
out the world, that the old decree for
a monument should now be made good.
The first steps were hesitating. First,
a bust of Father Paul was placed among
those of great Venetians in the court of
the Ducal Palace ; but the inscription
upon it was timid and double-tongued.
Another bust was placed on the Pincian
Hill at Rome, among those of the most
renowned sons of Italy. This was not
enough : a suitable monument must be
erected. Yet it was delayed, timid men
deprecating the hostility of the Roman
Court. At last, under the new Italian
monarchy, the patriotic movement be-
came irresistible, and the same impulse
which erected the splendid statue to
Giordano Bruno on the Piazza dei Fiori
at Rome, — on the very spot where he
was burned, — and which adorned it
with the medallions of eight other mar-
tyrs to ecclesiastical hatred, erected in
1892, two hundred and seventy years
after it had been decreed, a statue,
hardly less imposing, to Paolo Sarpi,
on the Piazza Santa Fosca at Venice,
where he had been left for dead by the
Vatican assassins. There it stands,
noble and serene, — a monument of
patriotism and right reason, a worthy
tribute to one who, among intellectual
prostitutes and solemnly constituted im-
postors, stood forth as a true man, the
greatest of his time, — one of the great-
est of all times, — an honor to Venice,
to Italy, and to humanity.
Andrew D. White.
TIMEO DANAOS.
ART proud, my country, that these mighty ones,
Wearing the jeweled splendor of old days,
Come bringing prodigality of praise
To thee amid thy light of westering suns ;
Bidding their blaring trumpets and their guns
Salute thee, late into their crooked ways
Now fallen, to their sorrow and amaze,
Blood of whose hearts the ancient honor runs ?
Nay, fear them rather, for they cry with glee,
" She has become as one of us, who gave
All that she had to set a people free:
She wears our image — she that loved the slave!"
Fear them, for there is blood upon their hands,
And on their heads the curse of ruined lands.
John White Chadwick.
234
Timotheos and the Persians.
TIMOTHEOS AND THE PERSIANS.
FOB a dead language Greek betrays
a shameless vivacity. Not content with
putting forth new shoots and fruits, —
and Athens to-day, is said to turn out
more books and periodicals per capita
than any other community on the globe,
— the old trunk must needs revive at the
roots. Dead, it may be, in the snap
judgments of a little hour ; yet the Phi-
listine woodman may well be warned to
spare this sacred olive, whose very stump
gives promise of immortal aftergrowth.
The voluminous literature of contem-
porary Greece does not concern us here ;
but the " bursting forth of genius from
the dust " is brought home to us once
more in the recovery of Timotheos. It
is hardly six years since we were wel-
coming back a far sweeter singer in Bac-
chylides; yet few may remember how
this new lead was opened well-nigh fifty
years ago by the finding of Alkman's
maiden-song, — a song that admits us to
the very dance of that Laconian herd of
girls, with the radiant Hagesichora and
Agido at their head. Since then every
mummy-case is become a possible casket
of hid treasure for the Hellenist, for even
the embalmed crocodile is often wrapped
in old Greek texts ; and to such safe-
keeping we are already indebted for not
a few precious works long lost to the
world, — among them considerable vol-
umes of Aristotle, Bacchylides, and He-
rondas, and important fragments of Ar-
chilochos, Sappho, and Menander.
The earliest and latest of these finds
1 The papyrus measures some 42 inches in
length, divided into five columns of about 26
lines each, and is written in clear-cut capitals,
such as mark the lapidary inscriptions of the
fourth century, — thus confirming the other
archaeological data, which fix the interment
about 350 B. C., and so make this by far the
oldest Greek book yet known to us. Strictly
speaking, it is but half a book. The papyrus
had been cut clean in two, leaving no margin,
come from the same neighborhood, that
of old Memphis ; and each restores an
else lost form of Greek melic, — the par-
thenion, all the more precious because of
Alkman's unchallenged mastery in that
kind, and the nome in which Timotheos
won his chief laurels.
This last recovery we owe to a German
spade, as we owe its editio princeps to
that prince of German humanists, von
Wilamowitz-Mollendorf . While conduct-
ing excavations in February, 1902, at
Abousir (ancient Busiris, a suburb of
Memphis), Ludwig Borchardt struck an
old Egyptian mummy-case tenanted (at
second hand) by a stalwart Greek, whose
well-kept anatomy shows once more how
fully the Greeks in the Nile country had
adopted Egyptian burial customs. From
lesions in the skull it would seem that
this strapping Greek had come to a vio-
lent end ; and, indeed, he may have
fought and fallen in that Egyptian cam-
paign of Agesilaus and Chabrias (circa
358 B. c.). For his last long Campaign
in the undiscovered country, his outfit
is slight enough, — chiefly, an empty
leather purse, a pair of sandals, and a
poet ! Happily, in this instance, the poet
had signed his work ; and no sooner was
the papyrus unrolled than it was seen to
be the long lost PERSIANS of Timotheos,
and that in a copy well-nigh old enough
to have come from the author's own
hand.1
A volume that Demosthenes and Aris-
totle might have thumbed must stir even
not to say fly-leaf, for our first column ; and
Wilamowitz judges from the text that more
than half the whole poem is missing. Appar-
ently, a stingy heir grudged our mummied
Greek a full libretto ; and, inasmuch as the
roll always opened from the title-column, it is
the first part (possibly including other pieces)
that is lopped off, — leaving us, luckily, the
poet's seal and signature.
Timotheos and the Persians.
235
a sluggish imagination. And, quite apart
from that, Wilamowitz is not without
warrant, in holding that these two hun-
dred and fifty verses of Timotheos are
historically worth a hundredfold more
than as many new verses of Pindar or
Sophocles, no matter how inferior in in-
trinsic value. On the other hand, some
good Hellenists — regarding the Pin-
daric rule that " each ungodded thing is
none the worse for being quenched in si-
lence " — might be glad to give our poet
another millennial lease of sleep. Cer-
tainly, no Hellenic god in his sober spells
could have taken pure delight in a per-
formance so un-Hellenic as The Persians,
— as un-Hellenic, at first blush, as the
" Artimis by Ephesus," on whom our
sputtering Phrygian relies. Still, as no
artist can pass quite unheeded that out-
landish alabaster-bronze Diana of the
Ephesians in the Naples Museum, so no
student of literature can quite shut his
eyes to a work, however unclassical, of
this master-singer of his time.
In that conviction, I have had the
temerity — in the face of the editor prin-
ceps, who declares it untranslatable — to
undertake a transcript of The Persians,
and, indeed, to try to hit off " the very
turn of each phrase in as Greek a fash-
ion as English will bear." How much of
that fashion English will bear, now that
the man in the street is our schoolmas-
ter, it may not be easy to measure. Cer-
tainly, were he to-day asked for glosses
on his great Pindaric ode, Gray could
hardly plead again " too much respect for
the understanding of his readers to take
such a liberty." At all events, the pre-
sent reader will hardly resent the liberty
taken in some slight prolegomena, intend-
ed mainly to clear his way through a jun-
gle of metaphor, and to set him in touch
with the old singer and his audience.
If Timotheos was "the detestation of
the old Athens, the darling of the new,"
we must remember that he was not Athe-
nian born. " The town that nursed him,"
as he tells us in The Persians, was Mile-
tus ; and Milesian manners — Ionian
crossed with Carian on the distaff side
from the very start — would have some-
what of an Oriental cast even when the
place ceased for a while to be a Persian
outpost under the Peace of Kallias, con-
cluded about the time of the poet's birth
(circa 450 B. c.). And we know what
strange fruits its proper breeding could
yield, — fruits which Athens was even
then proving, with no great relish, in the
person of Aspasia.
To the young Milesian sane fifth-cen-
tury Athens would be but a slow old
town ; and, when he bestirred him to
set the pace anew, no wonder she de-
tested him. In The Persians, indeed, the
apology for his art may impress the
reader as a bit abject, but then he is
pleading to a Spartan bench. Contrast
this frank avowal (Fragment 12), doubt-
less flung in the face of Athenian cen-
sors, who hardly went with Euripides in
hailing Timotheos as the poet of the
future : —
" Nay, I sing no more the old songs,
For our new ones are the better.
Newly Zeus our king now reigneth,
But of old was Kronos ruler.
Get thee gone, then, thou antique Muse."
Of the new Muse's quality, the extant
fragments — some thirty lines all told —
had left us in small doubt. Notably,
the first from the Hymn to Artemis,
which Ephesian taste rated at a thousand
gold pieces, and the Ephesian budget
provided for accordingly, but which must
have set Athenian teeth on edge. Its
sole fragment is just a string of epithets,
6vid8a (f>oij3a.8a //.atvaSct AucreraSa
(as who should say, —
antical frantical mantical rant-ical ! ),
singularly suggestive of the Naples enor-
mity ; and we can but sympathize with
lank old Kinesias, — something of a
" song-twister " himself, — who, on the
poet's repeating them at Athens, rose in
the theatre and sang out, " May you get
a daughter of your own like that ! "
236
Timotheos and the Persians.
In one instance, happily, we can con-
front the new Muse with the old, and
measure the celestial diameter that di-
vides them ; for we have the Milesian's
" Wine of Ismaros " and its Homeric
original. Here is the good old vintage
(Odyssey ix, 208 f.) : —
" Oft as they drank that red wine honey-sweet,
One cup he 'd fill and then on twenty parts of
water
Pour it, and a sweet smell from the mixer
smelled
And marvellous. Then, truly, 't were no plea-
sure to refrain."
And here is the Milesian brew (Frag-
ment 3) : —
" He filled one ivy-cup of the dark
ambrosial drop, with foam a-bubbling,
and that on twenty measures poured and
blended
Bacchus' blood with Nymphs' fresh-flowing
tears."
Shades of Byron and his " Chinese
nymph of tears, green tea ! " The ratio
is Homeric, but the bouquet is fled ; and
for honest wine and water who could
choose this drench of blood and tears !
From these bits we get a fair foretaste
of the longer poem. Timotheos is nothing
if not metaphorical. He cannot call a
spade a spade. It is no plain javelin, but
Ares himself, whose ether-borne body we
see shot from men's hands, and lighting on
limbs (of ships ?), where it still quivers ;
the sword is a cutthroat minister (" ye
murthering ministers ") ; and hors de
combat is orphaned of battles. His ships
have no gunwales and rowlocks, but
mouths and teeth, — which are, to be
sure, the children of the mouth ; no oars,
but hands or feet, — now fir-tree hands,
and now long - neck - floating mountain-
grown feet ; no hulls, but limbs ; no ram,
but an iron skull or a side-assailing flash.
They are not simply stripped of their
oars, they are " disglorified," and, in
lieu of keeling over, they just " toss up
their manes." Quite the caper, this, for a
sea-horse, and even Pindar sings " swift
Argo's bridle," and makes Viking Posei-
don Master of the Horse tTnraos, as
he was, in fact, the primal Horseman;
or it may be a concession to the " emer-
ald-haired sea," which swallows many a
wretch from "Mysia's tree-maned glens "
before the " ship-drops " incarnadine it.
As these ship-drops may be either fly-
ing brands or spurts of blood, my " ships'
red rain " follows the poet in leaving the
reader his choice. The bay of Salamis
is " Amphitrite's fish-enwreathed mar-
ble-girt bosom ; " and to one who has
watched the play of a glancing school
of many-tinted fishes that were no bad
posy for the sea-dame's breast. From
his throne on ^Egaleos the Great King
" hems in with errant eyes " these floating
plains (one thinks of the Lotus-Eaters'
" wandering fields of barren foam "), —
that is to say, he sweeps the battle scene
with imperious glance. But he has al-
ready "built a solid roof o'er floating
Helle," and " yoked down her haughty
neck in a hemp-bound collar," — both
variations on the familiar bridge of boats.
Yet this protean sea fairly outdoes her-
self, when upon the Phrygian landlubber
she rains " a foaming flood unbacchic,"
and plumps into — not his stomach, but
— his bread-basket (rp6<ftifjiov ayyos).
But this sea-water cure is sui generis ;
and we can almost hear the roar of the
groundlings, to whom, here and again
flagrantly in the broken Greek of the
Kelainaean, the poet is playing.
Still, there are redeeming touches:
" the woven beauty of the limbs ; " " Fire's
lurid sprite with its fierce body burning
up" the flower of Persia's youth; and
" the Mountain-Mother's dark-leaf-kir-
tled queenly knees" and "fair-elbowed
arms." There we can yet see, as the
wretched suppliant saw in his mind's
eye, the sculptured form of his far-away
Phrygian goddess, with her embroidered
drapery, like that of the kindred Mis-
tress of Lykasoura now in the Athens
Museum, and her bare forearms gleam-
ing white, as we know them in many an
old Greek marble.
But we must not anticipate too much,
Timotheos and the Persians.
237
needful as these glosses are to the ap-
prehension of a poet who has so far
abused the coining privilege and over-
worked the metaphor that the " dress-
ing " bids fair to oust the dinner. Still,
we may not forget that these multiple
Massilian compounds, with their ringing
numbers, were addressed not so much to
the understanding as to the ear. It is no
longer, as in the great Lyric Age, " music
married to immortal verse," but verse
harnessed in the triumphal car of music.
The Queen of the Lyre is become its
creature, the poet lost in the composer ;
and The Persians is an opera. But only
its bare words have come down to us ;
for the old Greek who fell on sleep at
Busiris was no singer, and so had not
provided himself with the score. Justly
to appreciate it, we must put ourselves
in the place of its first hearers : we must
take our seats in the great gathering of
the twelve Ionian cities at Poseidon's
sacred grove on the north slope of Mount
Mykale in or about the year 396 before
Christ.1
On this bold headland one vividly re-
calls that well-aimed blow at Persian
power delivered here not so many years
past, and one may even fancy that the
Milesian singer in his new Persians is
to celebrate that day and this scene.
But not so. It is the scene and day
of Salamis, already immortalized by a
greater singer in a greater Persians, —
by a poet who was there, and who is tell-
ing the story to his comrades in the
Athenian theatre, whose upper benches,
at least, look out on the strait where he
and they pulled stroke for stroke, and
fought shoulder to shoulder, only eight
years before. If there be on Mykale
to-day a centenarian who was in that
fight and at that play, and who is look-
ing for somewhat to stir his old Athe-
1 Such, with good reason, Wilamowitz takes
to be the time, place, and occasion of bringing
out the piece.
2 Anyway, it was so with Philopoamen
some two centuries later, when, at the head of
the stalwart, well set-up men whom he had
nian blood, he is doomed to sore disillu-
sion. For Athens the times are out of
joint, and Sparta is in the saddle, — ay,
in the front seats here at the Panionia.
Even the Persian has more to do him
reverence now than the City, — the Per-
sian who in three short years is again to
sit as satrap in Miletus itself, while Ko-
non restores the Long Walls with the
King's gold. And so in all our opera,
a thinly veiled plea for an aggressive
Eastern policy under Sparta's lead, we
do not catch the name of Athens. But
then it is all a story without a name, —
even Salamis and Xerxes are nameless ;
and, indeed, the only persons named in
the body of the piece are deities. How
unlike our jEschylus's bristling bead-roll
of Iranian grandees, his stately muster
of the streams and isles of Hellas !
As the musician-poet enters in his
singing robes, with the garland on his
brow, and, smiting the lyre, leads off in
the noble hexameter, —
" Liberty's great and glorious jewel for Hellas
achieving," —
our old Athenian may well think of
Themistocles, but all eyes are upon
Agesilaus,2 as they are again when he
portrays the strenuous Spartan's very
features in the line, —
" Revere ye spear-embattled Valor's helpmate,
Modesty ; ' '
and again, upon this ringing challenge, —
" Ares is lord, but Hellas dreads not Gold."
For this Spartan Agamemnon of a new
Iliad has turned the tables on the Per-
sian, and satraps are learning to cool
their heels on his doorsteps ; while herds
of Asiatics, spoil of his triumphant
raids, are stripped and paraded in their
soft, white limbs for athletic Greeks to
crow over, and then — particularly the
Phrygians — driven off to glut Ionian
slave marts.
recently led to victory at Mantinea (207 B. c.),
he entered the theatre at Nemea just as Pyla-
des, the first kitharoides of the age, was sing-
ing the same verse. We owe to Polybius this
proof that the Persians held the stage so long.
238
Timotheos and the Persians.
Timotheos has caught the cue ; and,
having once set his battle in array, he
passes to a series of scenes well chosen
to heighten Hellenic scorn without too
far outraging Hellenic taste.
There is, to begin with, the Phrygian
landlubber afloat and — with all comic cir-
cumstance— swallowing the sea, which
takes his tongue-lashing, and then swal-
lows him in turn. Then the shivering
wretches on the rocks, the pathos of
whose appeal to their far-off fatherland
and the Phrygian goddess strikes a true
tragic note. Again, to split the ears of
the groundlings, another Phrygian, haled
by the hair of his head, grovels at his
captor's knees, and in painfully broken
Greek sues for life, in which suit a cho-
rus of Asiatics join, as in a fugue. And,
finally, we look upon the utter rout, and
listen to the Great King's simple and
not undignified lament.
If we have* not perused a battle his-
tory, we have witnessed a battle drama ;
and we feel how fully the poet must have
placed the scenes before his own eyes,
and acted the parts in his own mind, be-
fore he could bring them, thus throbbing,
home to us. He does not stay to cele-
brate the victory ; but, with brief allu-
sion to trophy, paean, and dance, he drops
the theme. Indeed, to compare slight
things with sublime, he has just touched
the theme " in points of light," as the
Theban singer signals us from peak to
peak in his Quest of the Golden Fleece.1
It remains to seal the performance
with the poet's apology addressed to the
Spartan who has flouted him and his
muse, but who should now be mollified
by the subtle flattery pf his new song.
It is a rather pedestrian " Progress of
Poesy : " first, Orpheus ; next, your
own Terpander ; now, Timotheos, —
come not to pervert, but to perfect. And
then, with his best bow to mother Mile-
tus and the Panionian community, in-
voking on their heads Apollo's gift of
Peace, with her mate Good Government,
1 Pindar's Fourth Pythian.
the singer quits the thymele (not Diony-
sos' altar, here, but Poseidon's), leaving
us content with the sweet and insinuat-
ing music of his eleven strings, even if
somewhat surfeited with his superfine
metaphors and his coarse fun. All but
our old Athenian : now that he has
assisted at the great Persians and the
small, he must be taking the true mea-
sure of his century as he muses grimly
on the descent from ^schylus to Timo-
theos ; from Salamis to jEgospotami ;
from that
"Radiant, violet-crowned, exalted in song,
Bulwark of Hellas, glorious Athens,
City of walls divine,"
to the flute-girl frolic in which the
starved and stricken City has but lately
seen those walls pulled down. And it
is a son of Miletus, her eldest and best
loved daughter, who can sing the song
of Salamis without once remembering
that Athens was ! Between this lyre
and those flutes our veteran surely has his
fill of a music fit " to untune the sky."
But it is high time to let the poet
speak for himself, albeit in broken num-
bers. With all the resources of free
coinage, wherein German asks little or no
odds of Greek, Wilamowitz pronounces
The Persians untranslatable ; and the
reader may presently agree with him.
But what follows is Timotheos unadul-
terated, with his metaphors gone mad,
his long, loose-jointed epithets, his dithy-
rambic diction, — half riddle, half jar-
gon, — in short, treading his own mea-
sure, so far as I dare let him, without
leaving the reader quite in the dark.
Something has been sacrificed to keep
the prevailing iambic movement, while
quite neglecting the lyric variations ; for
the transcript makes no claim to be any-
thing but modulated prose, and the lin-
ing is merely for convenience in refer-
ring to the Greek text.
Of the first half of the poem, we have
only the three random lines already
quoted which it may be well to reset in
their probable connection. The first col-
Tlmotheos and the Persians.
239
umn of the papyrus yields hardly one
complete word, to say nothing of connect-
ed sense. In the second, though some-
what mutilated, the drift is clear. The
battle is on, the ram is rampant. We
get a glimpse of ships, " with cornice-
lanced frame of teeth set round for the
feet," — that is to say, red gunwales, with
white rowlocks for the oars ; and of rams,
" with arched heads beset, that sweep
aside the fir-tree hands." And now, from
verse 8 of the editio princeps, we may
take the plunge with the poet.
THE LIBRETTO.
Liberty's great and glorious jewel for Hellas
achieving . . .
(The overture would align the great antagonists,
Greek and Barbarian, and must have sounded a
note of genuine national feeling. Then comes the
contrast with Eastern swagger or Athenian hy-
bris :)
Revere ye spear-embattled Valor's helpmate,
Modesty !
(And, now that the King's gold is again open-
ing Greek city-gates, this defiance :)
Ares is lord, but Hellas dreads not Gold.
And oft as thence was dealt
the unforewarned blow,
10 thwart-breaking, all rushed upon
the foeman front to front.
And if upon the sides the lightning leapt,
with sweep of quick-stroke pine
the ships bore back again.
And some, with timbers riven all apart,
laid bare their linen-girthed ribs ;
some, 'neath the plunging leaden shaft,
tossed up their manes and sank ;
and some on beam-ends lay,
20 of all their bravery shorn
by the iron skull.
Now, like to Fire, man-quelling
Ares loop-enleashed
shot from hands and fell on limbs,
through all his ether - coursing frame
a-quiver still.
The hard-packed murderous leaden bolts
sped on their coarse, and on sped pitchy
balls
on galling ox-goads set and all aflame
with fire.
And life innumerons was sacrificed
30 to slender feathery bronze-tipt flights
from bow-string tense.
And, lo ! the emerald-tressed sea
in furrows 'neath the ships' red rain
incarnadined ;
and shriek and shout commingled rose.
And now anear the ships' array
barbaric, pell-mell, bore down again
in Amphitrite's fish-enwreathed bosom
marble-girt ; where, sooth to say,
40 a Phrygian landsman,
lord of demense a day's run round,
plowing with his legs the showery plain
and paddling with his hands, an islesman
floated now,
lashed by winds and billow-buffeted,
still vainly seeking thoroughfare.
( But there is no thoroughfare ; and the next 25
lines are in as desperate case as the spent swim-
mer who meets us again as soon as the text closes
up in Column III.)
70 ... When here the winds went down,
there in upon him rained
a foaming flood unbacchic
and down his gullet poured ;
but when the upheaved
brine surged o'er his lips,
in shrill-pitched
voice and frenzied
mood of mind
thus, loathful, on that ruin of his life,
80 the sea, he railed
and gnashed his teeth
in mimic wise :
" Erewhile, bold brute,
thy furious neck thou got'st
yoked down in linen-lashed bond ;
and now my master, mine,
shall rouse thee up
with mountain-gendered pines
and hem in thy fields of flood with er-
rant eyes —
90 thou oestrus-maddened ancient hate
and fickle leman
of the whelming wind ! "
He said, with spent breath strangling,
and the loathly gorge outcast,
withal upbelching
at the mouth the deep-sea brine.
Anon, in flight back sped the Persian
host barbaric in hot haste.
And swirl on swirl of galleys crashed ;
100 and out of hand they flung
the long lithe-plying highland
feet o' the ship, while from ship's mouth,
ontleapt its marble-gleaming
offspring in the shock.
240
Timotheos and the Persians.
As sown with stars, with bodies now
bereft of life and breath
the deep sea swanned
and laden were the shores.
Or on the sea-cliffs
110 stranded, naked-freezing,
with cry and moan and trickling tear,
breast-beating wallers
urged the mournful plaint
and called, the while, upon their father-
land:
" 0 Mysia's tree-maned glens,
rescue me hence, where we by blasts
are borne ; else nevermore
shall earth receive my frame,
now that my hand hath touched the old-
nymph-
breeding grot untrodden
. . . goal deeper than the sea.
O, have me hence, where once o'er
Helle's flood a solid roof —
a pathway far and firm —
my master builded me. Else Tmolos
I had not quitted, — nay, nor Sardes'
Lydian town,
nor come to ward this Hellene Ares off.
130 And now how shall we win — of refuge
all forlorn —
a refuge sweet from doom ?
She that fares to Ilion sole deliverer
from woes might prove,
if haply at the Mountain-Mother's
dark-leaf -kirtled queenly knees
't were mine to fall
and I might clasp her fair white arms.
Deliver, golden-tressed goddess
Mother, I implore,
140 my life, mine own — of refuge all forlorn ;
for that right now
and here with cutthroat minister of steel
they shall make way with me,
or wave-dissolving ship-destroying
blasts, with nightly freezing Boreas
leagued,
to pieces dash me. For round about
the billow wild hath broken all
the woven beauty of my limbs
and I shall lie here, pitiful,
150 for carrion crew of birds to batten
So made they moan and wept.
But oft as iron -haf ted Hellene
took and haled
some denizen of many-flocked Kelainai —
now orphaned of the fight —
by the hair he 'd clutch and hale him ;
while round about his knees the wretch
would twine
and supplicate, Hellenic speech with
Asian
intertwining and shrilly
160 shattering his lips' close seal,
the while he hunted out Ionian utter-
"I — thee — me — how — and what to
do?
Never would I come back again !
Even now my master 't was
that hither fetched me here.
Henceforth, no more, 0 sire,
no more to battle back here am I com-
ing
but to home I keep.
I — thee — hither — nay — I
170 yonder by Sardis, by Sousa,
by Agbatana abiding.
Artimis, my great god,
by Ephesus shall guard me."
Now, when back-faring flight
they took, swift faring,
straightway two-edged darts
from out their hands they flung,
and face by nail was torn,
and Persian robe fine-spun
180 about the breast they rent,
and tense attuned was
the Asian wail.
And then with many a groan and blow
on breast
the King's whole muster fell
on panic fear, envisaging the doom to
come.
And as the King beheld
that motley host urge on
the backward faring flight,
then on his knees he fell and marred his
flesh
190 and in the flood - tide of his troubles
" Alas ! the ruin of my house
and scorching ships of Hellas —
ye that utterly destroyed my mated prime
of youth — full many a man ;
and our ships . . .
shall bear them home again no more,
but Fire's lurid sprite
with its fierce body burn them up,
while groans and anguish
200 wait on Persia's land.
O heavy lot
that into Hellas led me !
Nay, go — no more delay — yoke ye
here
the four-horse chariot,
and the uncounted treasure
bear ye yonder on the wains,
By Catalogue.
241
and fire the tents,
and may they get
no comfort of our wealth."
210 And so they raised their trophy, Zeus'
holiest shrine ; Paian
hailed they loud, le'ian king ;
and in full choir beat time
with flying feet. •
O thou, who dost exalt the golden lyre's
new-fashioned strain,
come helper to my hymns,
le'ian Paian.
For Sparta's mighty leader-folk,
220 high-born, longeval,
yet swelling in youth's bloom,
with fiery blame upflaring
doth vex and drive me out —
for that with new-spun hymns
I put the elder Muse to shame.
But none, or young or old
or my co-eval,
from any hymns would I bar out.
Only the ancient-Muse-debasers —
230 them I ward away,
manglers of song
that quite outstrain
the shrill-loud-lungid heralds' cry.
First, the shell of varied note
our Orpheus fathered,
Kalliope's Pierian son.
And next with ten chords
Terpander yoked the Muse —
him Aiolian Lesbos bred,
240 Antissa's boast.
And last Timotheos
ushers in his lyre
with measured rhythm of eleven beats,
thus opening a many-hymned store
of the Muses garnered.
The town that nursed him is Miletus,
that graces our twelve-castled common-
wealth —
prime offshoot of the Achaian stock.
And now, far-darting Pythian, come
250 with blessing to this holy town ;
and aye to this inviolate commonwealth
send Peace
that blooms as Order's mate.
J. Irving Manatt.
BY CATALOGUE.
THE Doctor lifted the old lady out of
his buggy, and carried her carefully into
the hospital hall.
The transit would have been more dig-
nified and less dangerous if she had not
insisted on clinging to an uncommonly
large bandbox, which, being of a light-
hearted and irresponsible character, blew
about in the fresh breeze, now banging
the Doctor on the knee, now threatening
to knock off his hat, now caroming lightly
against the gate-post, and, finally, nar-
rowly escaping its own destruction by
getting underneath the old lady herself
just as the Doctor put her down in the
big chaii*.
" Now we 've got you where we can
take care of you, Mrs. Parrish," he said
cheerfully, as he wiped his brow with an
expansive and immaculate handkerchief,
and inwardly gave devout thanks that
the goal was reached ; for the hospital
. VOL. XCITI. — NO. 556. 16
was directly opposite a house where lived
a certain young woman with a sense of
humor, and the Doctor, being similarly
endowed, realized fully that it would not
have been possible to view his tortuous
course from the buggy to the hospital
door without an outburst of mirth.
Mrs. Parrish looked about her in ju-
dicial criticism and qualified disapproval.
Her dingy gown refused to yield to
the friendly advances of the chair, and
had the appearance of holding itself gin-
gerly aloof ; a still dingier bonnet of
mixed architecture sat upon her sparsely
haired head with a questioning air ; and
her careworn face, seamed with the long
war between inherent energy and dis-
couraged resignation, turned restlessly
as the sharp black eyes scrutinized that
spotless hall in search of a vantage-point
for unfavorable criticism.
" Well, I 'm here, right enough," she
242
By Catalogue.
said rather grimly. " I hope you did n't
hurt that bunnit-box any, comin' in.
You acted kind of keerless. Sounded to
me 's if it hit that fence-post pritty hard.
" Won't you ketch cold in that calico
dress ? " she inquired sharply of the nurse
who came toward her. " This 's as drafty
a hall 's I ever see."
" Then you 'd like to go to your room
at once, I 'm sure," responded the nurse
pleasantly. " I hope you '11 like the view
from the window as well as I do. You
can see every one who goes down town.
It 's like having callers all the time with-
out the trouble of entertaining them."
Katherine Gray, Nurse, was one of
those people whom you like instinctively
at first sight.
Even Mrs. Parrish's time - battered
face relaxed before the pleasant, sympa-
thetic smile, which seemed to compre-
hend, in some occult way, the exact men-
tal attitude of the person to whom it was
given.
The Doctor sometimes wondered if
Nurse Gray was as understandingly sym-
pathetic as she looked, and, if so, why she
was still alive.
One of the first signs of her conquest
in the present instance was Mrs. Par-
rish's graciously accorded permission to
carry the bandbox upstairs to the little
room overlooking the main thoroughfare.
" I don't know what she has in it,"
said the Doctor to Nurse Gray later, in
the corridor, "but from the way she
guarded it coming down, I should sus-
pect that it held the crown jewels, at least.
You have n't heard that any of the
crowned heads have been advertising
that they 've lost theirs ? — No ? —
Have her ready for the operation at eight
to-morrow morning. Yes. Major opera-
tion, — pretty serious. McShane 's com-
ing to help me. She has a fair chance
if the heart behaves all right. Good-
morning, Miss Gray."
It was a bright, cheery little room :
the white-painted furniture, the white
iron bed, the crisp white muslin curtain
at the window, and the cool, fresh feeling
of the bed linen gave Mrs. Parrish an
unaccustomed sense of well-being; and
her tired muscles, tense with the struggle
of coping with the exigencies of life, per-
mitted themselves the pleasure of a gen-
tle relaxation.
Nevertheless, when Nurse Gray came
into the room, Mrs. Parrish's eyes closed
in apparent slumber ; while beneath those
deceptive lids the keen old eyes watched
the nurse's every movement.
By accident, or design, the nurse kept
her back to the bed as she deftly lowered
the window shade just enough to shut
out a sunbeam that was growing a trifle
intrusive, and not enough to shut out the
sight of the passers-by.
But when she turned and placed on
the bedside table a perfect pink, hothouse
rose, in a slender, clear, glass vase, Mrs.
Parrish, suddenly wide-eyed, gave a gasp
of surprise.
" 'T ain't fur me," she said incredu-
lously.
" Certainly it is," smiled the nurse ;
" the lady across the hall sent it to you
with her kind regards. She is just sit-
ting up after an operation much like
yours, and she was interested in you at
once. She is coming in to see you when
she can."
A tear coursed its uncertain way down
the furrowed cheek.
" It 's proper kind of her," said Mrs.
Parrish, her mouth working at the cor-
ners.
Nurse Gray went quietly out of the
It was evening, and Mrs. Parrish sat up
in bed, with a dull red spot on each cheek.
" You 're a good girl," she said to the
nurse, " 'n' I 'm goin' to tell you about it.
It 's an even chance I don't git through
that operation to-morrow, 'n' I want it off
my mind anyway. Hand me my bun-
nit-box. I hed to bring it with me. I
wa'n't goin' to have folks a-peekin' an'
By Catalogue.
243
pryin' round while I vvuz gone, 'n' spec'-
latin' on it. You see," she went on, work-
ing at the knot with trembling fingers,
" I ain't got any too much money. I
guess you could see that. But I 've tried
awful hard to keep up 'pearances, 'n' to
do the best I could. 'N' I 've paid my
debts, 'n' hed a new bunnit once a year,
'n' kep' my mouth shet about half starvin'
myself to git it. 'N' I expect I talked
bigger 'n I spent, to the neighbors ; but
you know how 't is : you 've got to keep
up some in talk when you can't keep up
much in spendin'."
" I know," said Nurse Gray gently.
" 'N' I allus sent fur Morton 'n' Kurd's
catalogue, — you kin buy anything on
airth there, — 'n' picked out my bunnit
from the pictures, 'n' ordered it by num-
ber ; 'n' I mus' say they was allus jus'
like it, 'n' give me good satisfaction.
" Well, this spring I saved 'n' scrimped,
'n' I picked out a proper bunnit. It hed
a feather ?n' a velvet bow ; 'n' 't was
three seventy-five. The catalogue man
hed printed under it, ' Really worth jive
dollars.' I s'pose probably 't was. I
wrote 'em jus' as I allus hed, 'n' ordered
by number, 'n' sent the money. 'N'
this," said Mrs. Parrish solemnly, " this
is what come."
With the air of a priestess placing a
sacrificial offering upon the altar, she took
from her box, and presented to Nurse
Gray's astonished eyes, a child's hat.
And such a hat ! Coarse leghorn,
decked out with ribbon whose blue paro-
died the Mediterranean, and a wreath of
roses whose garish color and patent ar-
tificiality constituted a grotesque carica-
ture which would have caused the Queen
of Flowers to win in a libel suit.
" Well ? " gasped Katherine Gray, for
once nonplused.
" I 'd ordered from an old fall cata-
logue," answered Mrs. Parrish wearily.
" This was the number in the new spring
one."
" But would n't they exchange it ? "
The nurse was catching at straws now.
" I wrote 'em," said Mrs. Parrish, giv-
ing the touch of finality to the tragedy,
" 'n' they wrote back that they regretted
that they could n't break their invariable
rule not to exchange trimmed hats, 'n'
they was sincerely mine. So was this
hat," she added grimly.
" That 's all," she said, lying back on
the pillows again, " except that I ain't
got any money to git another ; 'n' I don't
much keer how that operation comes out
to-morrow. I 'd 'bout as soon die 's
wear my ol' bunnit all summer. It 's
easy enough to talk about not keerin'
fur the things of this world, but the
folks that does is mostly the folks that
has 'em, I 've noticed."
From disaster to its remedy, Nurse
Gray's mind took its usual logical course,
— surmounted several obstacles to find
itself in a blind alley, and came back,
finally, to take, not at all to her surprise,
the way which led to a personal sacrifice
on her part.
For there were reasons why even
three seventy-five looked a sizable sum
to Nurse Gray just then.
" We must find some child whose
mother will buy it," she said cheerfully.
" Of course, if you paid three seventy-
five for it, it is worth that. And I think
if you will trust me with it, I can sell it
for you."
" I guess I kin trust you, right
enough," said Mrs. Parrish, with a grim
smile. " I ain't a mite afraid you '11
wear it yourself ; 'n' if you could sell
it " — The light of hope came back into
her eyes.
Up in her own room, Nurse Gray ex-
tracted the sum in question from a pock-
et-book whose extreme emaciation sug-
gested long lack of proper nourishment,
and she laughed a little unsteadily as she
did so.
The Things of This World are also
desirable when one is twenty-four.
Then she fell upon the offending band-
244
George, Borrow.
box with superfluous energy, and jammed
it, with its contents, on her brightly burn-
ing grate fire.
" You shall disfigure no human head,"
she said gayly, shaking her finger at the
last rose as it burned to a crisp on its
supposedly parent stem, "and you de-
served death anyway."
Mrs. Parrish's eyes questioned her.
"Yes, it's sold," she said.
" Was the party responsible ? " qua-
vered Mrs. Parrish.
" Entirely," laughed the nurse. " I '11
have the money for you when you wakeup.
Now you must take the ether nicely."
" Breathe slowly and deeply, Mrs.
Parrish," said the Doctor, " slowly and
deeply — slowly — deeply — slowly —
deep — "
It sounded like the ticking of a clock
to her as she slipped away down — down
— down — into a black stillness.
The little room was bright with the
glory of the noonday sun ; the Doctor
stood beside her, smiling like a school-
boy, Nurse Gray was adjusting the pil-
low comfortably under her head, and
on the dresser she saw a little pile of
silver coins.
" You 're a prize patient, Mrs. Par-
rish," said the Doctor exultantly, " and
you are going to be a well woman. Now
while you 're lying here perfectly still,
you must think of the thing you 'd like
most to have, first of all."
Mrs. Parrish looked at the nurse.
" If you 'd send fur Morton 'n' Kurd's
spring catalogue ? " she said hesitat-
ingly.
" The very latest one," said Nurse
Gray gayly.
" Oh, you women ! " said the Doctor ;
but he smiled as he said it.
Mrs. Parrish closed her eyes con-
tentedly.
Beatrice Hanscom.
GEORGE BORROW.
IN that hour of precocious senility
which marks the passing of boyhood,
when it seemed quite clear to me that
everything was known and nothing worth
knowing, I had the luck to fall into the
company of George Borrow. He took
me in hand somewhat brusquely, and
showed me how to break a way through
the sophomoric thickets in which I had
got myself entangled. I had about de-
cided against immortality, for one thing,
and this seemed to leave me a little lan-
guid, temporarily, as to the business of
the present world. For the rest, I had
been growing sickly over sundry ques-
tions of current literary contrivance. I
wished (as much as it was convenient to
wish anything) to write like Maupassant
and to talk like Meredith ; I should not
have minded producing a story as good
as Tess of the D'Urbervilles. I also wrote
sonnets, after Rossetti, on love and death,
and on other themes of which I was as
well qualified to speak. Doubtless, con-
tact with any hardy nature might have
set me right, but the honor happened to
fall to Borrow. He was prompt to as-
sure me, in his blunt way, that life is not
a quibble, nor literature a trick ; and so
made a Borrovian of me for good and
all.
Borrovians are not a sect ; I believe
there is no society. They are simply the
people who belong to Borrow. No bet-
ter excuse can be made for the present
estimate than the one which was offered
nearly ten years ago by an English critic :
" I think that he should be written about
occasionally, if only for the reason that,
George Borrow.
245
his name being so seldom heard, there is
some danger of the right people going to
their graves without encountering him, —
a mischance that cannot be contemplated
easily by any right-thinking man." It
may be that the excuse is not so good as
it was, for Borrow 's work has been sev-
eral times reprinted since then, and the
little company of his friends has un-
doubtedly grown. Let us take refuge in
the fact that his centenary is barely past ;
and that some fresh mention of him in
these pages is therefore only a little over-
due.
If Borrow opens a new world to the
right people, it is not a world into which
mere wandering led him. One finds little
indication of his genius in the fact of those
early roving experiences of his. The
newspapers remind us daily how ordi-
nary, as recorded fact, extraordinary
conduct is. In his own time Sorrow's
exploits were barely a nine days' wonder;
now they would not be thought worthy of
remark. The slum, the dive, the hell,
the joint, are among the popular exhib-
its of our Vanity Fair, and it is easy to
get a respectable guide. Also, we have
learned to fare forth, with notebooks,
along the trail of the gypsy or the hobo,
and to make a show-place of his most
retired habitat. Borrow's motive differ-
entiates him from us, to be sure. He was
not a reporter or a student. He did not
look forward to a Ph. D. in sociology, or to
a display of higher journalism. His way-
side studies in ethnology and philology
were even less serious than he took them
to be. The simple truth is that he had
an instinct for vagabondage, and could
not keep away from it. It was a part
of him, and, as his talent was primarily
autobiographical, it went far toward de-
termining the substance of his work. But
it is the world in Borrow which gives en-
chantment to the world through which he
moved. If there are no new facts under
the sun, there is, thank Heaven, no dearth
of new personalities in the light of which
the old facts continue to serve admirably.
George Borrow was born in July, 1803,
of decent Cornish stock. His father was
a captain of militia, a sturdy, simple-
minded Briton, whose pride was to have
been for one glorious day the conqueror
of Big Ben, champion bruiser of all Eng-
land. , The son was also strong of frame
and able with his fists, but there was no-
thing else about him for the father to
understand. He bore, indeed, many of
the marks of the ne'er-do-weel. He left
undone many things which, from the pa-
rental point of view, he ought to have
done, and did many things which he
ought not to have done. He neglected
his Greek for Irish, he neglected law for
the company of law-breakers, and he
preferred the acquaintances to be made
in an inn or a stable to those which a re-
spectable provincial drawing-room could
afford. Yet there was much health in
him. He went his own way not through
viciousness, but through a hardy inde-
pendence of nature. Unfortunately the
world — and parents — have to make a
rule of discountenancing irregularity and
insubordination, because these are, in the
ordinary instance, signs of moral and
mental weakness. So, by this lamenta-
ble chance, it comes about that extraor-
dinary exertions of force often look quite
like the commonest laxities. It is easy
enough to see now that Borrow was sim-
ply going about his business. He did not
himself understand what that business
was, and had even a quaint sympathy
with the paternal disapproval. For whom
shall we feel the greater sympathy as
we listen to the last interview reported
between Lavengro and the stout cap-
tain ? —
" ' I wish to ask you a few questions,'
said he to me one day, after my mother
had left the room.
" ' I will answer anything you may
please to ask me, my dear father.'
" ' What have you been doing lately ? '
" ' I have been occupied, as usual, at-
tending at the office at the appointed
hours.'
246
George Borrow.
" l And what do you there ? '
"'Whatever I am ordered.'
" ' And nothing else ? '
" ' Oh, yes, I sometimes read a book.'
" ' Connected with your profession ? '
" ' Not always ; I have been lately
reading Armenian.' . . .
" ' What 's that ? '
" ' The language of a people whose
country is a region on the other side of
Asia Minor.'
" < Well ! '
" ' A region abounding in mountains.'
" « Well ! '
" ' Amongst which is Mount Arai-at.'
" ' Well ! '
" ' Upon which, as the Bible informs
us, the ark rested.'
" « Well ! '
" ' It is the language of the people of
those regions.'
" ' So you told me.'
" ' And I have been reading the Bible
in their language.'
" ' Well ! . . . And what does it all
amount to ? '
" ' Very little, father ; indeed, there
is very little known about the Armeni-
ans ; their early history, in particular, is
involved in considerable mystery.'
" ' And if you knew all that it is possi-
ble to know about them, to what would it
amount ? To what earthly purpose could
you turn it ? Have you acquired any
knowledge of your profession ? '
" ' Very little, father.'
" ' Very little ! Have you acquired
all in your power ? '
" ' I can't say that I have, father.' "
Upon such terms they soon after
parted.
It was not his unconventionality alone
which gave the family of young Borrow
cause for uneasiness. He was subject
to fits of what I suppose we should call
acute melancholia, — he called it " the
Fear," or " the Horrors," and it led him
more than once to the brink of suicide.
He never quite outgrew these seizures, but
in later life he learned to control them
by a prompt application of ale or port, —
a remedy which he recommends, with an
air of discovery, to whomsoever it may
concern.
The death of his father put an end to
Borrow'slaw studies, and dispatched him
to London, the forlorn spot in which,
with the customary fatuity of English
provincials, he fancied that a fortune lay
waiting for him. For the next ten years
he had a hard struggle to keep alive, by
dint of the meanest literary hack-work.
Beyond the compilation of records of
criminal trials, and the probably mythi-
cal Life of Joseph Sell of which Laven-
gro tells us, we are ignorant as to what
specific tasks may have occupied him.
It is clear that his appointment in 1833
as agent of the British and Foreign Bible
Society meant a rise in life. Thereupon
followed the adventures in Spain, and,
in 1840, his marriage to a widow of com-
fortable means. This brought an end to
his struggles, and set him free to lead for
the rest of his years (he died in 1881) a
quiet and independent life in the country.
By all accounts he was fonder to the last
of his gypsies and his 'ostlers than, as he
would have said scornfully, of " the gen-
teel persons " of his vicinity.
Wild Wales is the only record of these
later years, and the journey, made with
the impedimenta of a wife and a step-
daughter, could not be expected to yield
the most romantic episodes. It is by a
lucky chance that we are not given the
bill of fare at quite every meal. Yet
the vintage, if milder, has the right bou-
quet, and the faithful Borrovian would
sacrifice hardly a drop of it. Here, for
example, is a little vignette (wife and
stepdaughter being, it happens, some
miles in the background) : —
"The inn at Cerrig y Drudion was
called the Lion, whether the white, black,
red or green lion I do not know, though
I am certain that it was a lion of some
colour or other. It seemed as decent
and respectable a hostelry as any travel-
ler could wish, to refresh and compose
George Borrow.
247
himself in, after a walk of twenty miles.
I entered a well-lighted passage, and
from thence a well-lighted bar-room, on
the right hand, in which sat a stout,
comely, elderly lady dressed in silks and
satins, with a cambric coif on her head,
in company with a thin, elderly man with
a hat on his head, dressed in a rather
prim and precise manner. ' Madam,'
said I, bowing to the lady, ' as I sup-
pose you are the mistress of this estab-
lishment, I beg leave to inform you that
I am an Englishman walking through
these regions in order fully to enjoy their
beauties and wonders. I have this day
come from Llangollen, and being some-
what hungry and fatigued, hope I can be
accommodated here with a dinner and
a bed.'
" ' Sir,' said the lady, getting up and
making me a profound curtsey, ' I am
as you suppose the mistress of this estab-
lishment, and am happy to say that I
shall be able to accommodate you —
pray sit down, sir,' she continued, hand-
ing me a chair. ' You must indeed be
tired, for Llaugollen is a great way from
here.' "
All of the writing which brought Bor-
row fame was done after his marriage.
The Zincali (1841) lacked the vigor and
discursiveness of the later books, but
its theme was fresh, and its style had an
odd tang of its own which caught not
a few ears in Europe and elsewhere.
The author was advised of his faults,
and urged to do something better ; and
the something better which resulted was
The Bible in Spain. A remarkable pas-
sage in one of his prefaces describes his
manner of composing the book ; it is in
Sorrow's characteristic style : —
" Mistos amande : / am content, I re-
plied, and sitting down I commenced
The Bible in Spain. At first I pro-
ceeded slowly, — sickness was in the
land, and the face of nature was over-
cast, — heavy rain-clouds swam in the
heavens, — the blast howled in the pines
which nearly surround my lonely dwell-
ing, and the waters of the lake which
lies before it, so quiet in general and
tranquil, were fearfully agitated. ' Bring
lights hither, O Hazim Ben Attar, son
of the miracle ! ' And the Jew of Fez
brought in the lights, for though it was
midday I could scarcely see in the little
room where I was writing. ... A dreary
summer and autumn passed by and were
succeeded by as gloomy a winter. I still
proceeded with the Bible in Spain. The
winter passed, and spring came with
cold dry winds and occasional sunshine,
whereupon I arose, shouted, and mount-
ing my horse, even Sidi Habismilk, I
scoured all the surrounding district,
and thought but little of the Bible in
Spain. . . .
" Then came the summer with much
heat and sunshine, and then I would lie
for hours in the sun and recall the sunny
days I had spent in Andalusia, and my
thoughts were continually reverting to
Spain, and at last I remembered that
the Bible in Spain was still unfinished;
whereupon I arose and said, This loiter-
ing profiteth nothing, — and I hastened
to my summer-house by the side of the
lake, and there I thought and wrote, and
every day I repaired to the same place,
and thought and wrote until I had fin-
ished the Bible in Spain."
This is highly imaginative writing,
though Borrow probably was conscious
of giving nothing more than a simple
autobiographical item. There is an odd
reminder of Poe in it ; the opening lines
might almost be taken from The Fall of
the House of Usher, — or is it " the dank
tarn of Auber " of which this ominously
agitated English lake reminds one?
The Bible in Spain was taken seriously
by the English reviews. Borrow found
himself compared to Le Sage, Bunyan,
and Cervantes ; the critic who pleased
him most was the one who called the
book " a Gil Bias in water colours."
As a mere narrative of travels it would
have gained a wider hearing than such
248
George Borrow.
books can now hope for. It appeared
during a dark age of English and
American intelligence with regard to
foreign lands and peoples. If we still
manage to be reasonably ignorant of such
matters, it is not because we have lacked
the chance to learn. Just then even the
European world lay dark to our eyes,
and we were only beginning to ask for
light. Americans were eager for the
chance rays of Irving, and Englishmen
were ready to look upon the unaccus-
tomed scenes which Borrow brought be-
fore them.
This collocation of names suggests an
odd contrast. The Tales of the Alham-
bra were published in 1832, and The
Bible in Spain ten years later. Irving and
Borrow must have been in Spain at near-
ly the same time ; both were there pri-
marily on other than literary business ;
both presently turned their experiences to
literary account. Here the resemblance
ends. Irving was the senior by twenty
years, a writer of established reputation,
a man of elegant tastes. He was loyal
to the theory of democracy, but breathed
comfortably only in the air of what
Borrow called " gentility." He had a
quick eye for the picturesque and the
romantic, and a discreet blindness for the
squalid and the obscene. He found in
Spain a mighty treasure of romance, a
tradition of past greatness, striking rel-
ics of the Moorish occupancy, a national
temperament still full of grace and color.
So he wrote The Tales of the Alham-
bra.
Borrow was an unknown hack-writer,
a man of singular life and violent opin-
ion, by instinct a democrat, and by prac-
tice a vagabond. Spain was not a land
of romantic glamour to him. It was a
land of gross ignorance and superstition,
of duplicity, of kind hearts, of pleasantly
various dialects, of engrossing wayside
encounters. These are the materials
from which the fabric of The Bible in
Spain is wrought. How much weight the
element of information had with Bor-
row's audience is shown by the remark
of a contributor to Chambers's Cyclo-
paedia of English Literature after the ap-
pearance of Lavengro and The Romany
Rye : " These works are inferior in in-
terest to his former publications, but are
still remarkable books." The public was
not prompt in recognizing the pure genius
of this English colporteur and student of
gypsies.
That genius found, of course, its best
expression in Lavengro and its sequel,
which together form one of the strangest
narratives the world has known. I do
not mean that it seems to me queer ; the
strange thing about it is its spontaneity.
Nobody can feel that Borrow had to
choose between modes of expression ; it
was discursive autobiography or nothing
for him. Nor does there seem to have
been possible question as to the period
which he should record. At the end
of The Romany Rye he has reached his
twenty-fourth year. Of the next seven
years he never gave any account, allud-
ing to it as " the veiled period." One
or two intimations he let fall as to ex-
tensive traveling, which must have been
done, if at all, during this interval. His
editor and biographer (Professor Knapp,
an American) thinks this time was spent
at dreary hack-work which he wished to
forget and to have forgotten. However
this may be, there is no doubt that the
Lavengro narrative gives a full and fairly
accurate account of the first twenty-three
years of the author's life. During his
later years, Borrow chose to assert, and to
reassert, with a good deal of heat, that
the narrative " was not what is general-
ly termed an autobiography." Why he
made so sweeping an assertion nobody
knows. The researches of his biographer
have shown that in its original manu-
script form the narrative was frankly
personal, and that the changes which he
afterwards made to give it an impersonal
turn were as slight as they could well be.
That his characters were all drawn from
the life, moreover, is a fact which has
George Borrow.
249
been placed beyond doubt. What Bor-
row did, saw, felt, and was : these are the
themes which give his work value.
This he never fully understood, or we
should have been spared not only the
unhappy Appendix of which I shall have
to speak, but a good deal of material
which obstructs the free course of his
narrative. It is irritating that the Man
in Black should be allowed to intrude
upon so many of the precious moments
which we have to spend in Mumper's
Dingle with Lavengro and the glorious
Isopel. It is well enough to be invited
to hate the Pope of Rome, but there are
moments when we should prefer simply
to ignore him. Borrow prided himself
on being a champion of Protestantism,
a scholar, a philosopher. He was none of
these, but a writer of unique genius ; and
upon this fact, if he suspected it, he
prided himself not at all. Consequently,
when his book is attacked, he sets him-
self to defend it as a work in theology,
or philology, or morals. " Those who read
this book with attention . . . may derive
much information with respect to matters
of philology and literature ; it will be
found treating of most of the principal
languages from Ireland to China, and of
the literature which they contain ; and
it is particulai'ly minute with regard to
the ways, manners, and speech of the
English section of the most extraordinary
and mysterious clan or tribe of people to
be found in the whole world, — the chil-
dren of Roma. But it contains matters
of much more importance than anything
connected with philology, and the litera-
tures and manners of nations. Perhaps
no work was ever offered to the public
in which the kindness and Providence of
God have been set forth by more striking
examples, or the machinations of priest-
craft been more truly and lucidly ex-
posed, or the dangers which result to a
nation that abandons itself to effeminacy,
and a rage for what is novel and fashion-
able, than the present."
So Borrow looks upon his masterpiece
when it is done. Was there ever a more
extraordinary begging of the question ?
Of the voluminous commentary upon
himself and his critics, from which I have
just quoted (there are eleven chapters
of it printed as an Appendix to The
Romany Rye), one need only say that
it shows him at his worst. His creative
work was spontaneous and sound ; but
he was neither graceful nor convincing
as a controversialist. There is open ran-
cor with unstinted Billingsgate in this
extraordinary effusion : an indiscrimi-
nate damning of gentility, Popery, Tory-
ism, Whiggery, teetotalism, Jacobitistn,
Wellington - worship, and, in general,
"the thousand and one cants and species
of nonsense prevalent in England." It
is not pretty to read or comfortable to
remember. The truth is, Borrow never
knew what was important in his own
work ; and when it was received with
acrimony, on minor counts, among vari-
ous classes of sticklers for the conven-
tional, he was indiscreet enough to retort
in kind. He had plenty of bees in his
bonnet ; it is lucky that they did not
make greater havoc.
As a work of pure literature, Lavengro
and its sequel needed no defense ; they
constitute a sort of English Odyssey of
the Road. The hero has the Odyssean
craft and power of arm, and a wholly
English integrity ; he goes his way as the
wind blows, without fear or favor. What
talk, what ale, what scenes, what blows !
And what amazing figures : the Flam-
ing Tinman, Mrs. Hearne, who " comes
of the hairy ones," Mr. Petulengro the
inconsequential, the postilion, Francis
Ardry, the apple-woman, — there is no
end to them, unless (and she ought to be
the beginning) we make an end with the
name of the great Isopel Berners. Her
real name was Bess, late authorities say ;
I shall continue to love her as Isopel. I
can forgive Lavengro anything else, even
his Armenian verbs, but never his clumsi-
ness in losing that magnificent young per-
250
George, Borrow.
son. Nor can I help thinking that last
glimpse of her one of the most moving
scenes in literature, though there is not
much in the words, after all : " On ar-
riving at the extremity of the plain, I
looked towards the dingle. Isopel Ber-
ners stood at the mouth, the beams of the
early morning sun shone full on her
noble face and figure. I waved my hand
towards her. She slowly lifted up her
right arm. I turned away, and never
saw Isopel Berners again."
In truth, this is not " what is generally
termed autobiography." Each incident
and character seems to have had a coun-
terpart in Borrow's actual experience, but
stands transfigured in his narrative. He
was not, I have said, a reporter. He was
a creative artist who worked with the
chance materials which experience of-
fered. It is well enough to rank him with
Cervantes, Le Sage, and Bunyan ; he
has also been compared to Hawthorne,
Sterne, and Defoe ; and I have just been
guilty of finding something of Foe in him.
The truth is, one might go on with this
kind of rating until one had complet-
ed the list of prose geniuses who have
expressed themselves somewhat irregu-
larly and discursively. So far, I be-
lieve, nobody has happened to name
Rousseau or De Quincey in this connec-
tion. If it were profitable to make any
detailed comparison, it would be with
Defoe, the writer who first aroused Bor-
row from his childish lethargy, the only
master whom he acknowledged : " Hail to
thee, spirit of Defoe ! What does not my
own poor self owe to thee ? England has
better bards than either Greece or Rome,
yet I could spare them easier far than
Defoe, ' unabashed Defoe,' as the hunch-
backed rhymer styled him."
Borrow stood as square upon his own
feet as any one who ever wrote, and this
has irritated the academic mind. He
has yet to make his way, after Defoe,
into the manuals of literary history.
There are, as we have seen, confused ele-
ments in his work. When one cannot
tell whether a writer is trying to express
opinions, to communicate facts, or to in-
terpret life, it is hard to make up one's
mind as to what he has actually done.
With Borrow the chief intention seems
to have been to edify, the chief impulse,
to interpret. His work seems too often
to spring from the unamiable wedlock
of these two motives.
In The Zincali, after speaking of the
skill of the English gypsies as jockeys,
he says impressively, "They are also
fond of resorting to the prize ring, and
have occasionally even attained some emi-
nence in those disgraceful, and brutal-
izing exhibitions called pugilistic com-
bats." Now the Borrows, father and
son, were, as we have noted, skilled in
the manly art, and not a few passages
in Lavengro owe their charm to the gusto
with which the artist and Briton de-
scribes a hearty bout with the natural
weapon. What should we do without the
battle between Jerry Grant and Bagg ? —
"Bagg says that he was quite satisfied
with the blow, more especially when he
saw the fellow reel, fling out his arms,
and fall to the ground." — Or the mill
with the Flaming Tinman, Belle second-
ing, and coaching Lavengro to the final
triumphant application of " Long Mel-
ford " ? — Or the salutary lesson given to
a bully by the elderly disciple of Brough-
ton?
Nor is Lavengro always a reluctant
spectator at " those brutalizing exhibi-
tions." He has, indeed, hardly a more
memorable passage than that noble apos-
trophe of the bruisers of England : " Let
no one sneer at the bruisers of England
— what were the gladiators of Rome,
or the bull-fighters of Spain, in its palm-
iest days, compared to England's bruis-
ers ? Pity that ever corruption should
have crept in amongst them — but of
that I wish not to talk ; let us still
hope that a spark of the old religion, of
which we were the priests, still lingers
in the breasts of Englishmen. There
they come, the bruisers from far London,
George Borrow.
251
or from wherever they might chance to
be at the time, to the great rendezvous
in the old city. . . . Hail to thee, Tom
of Bedford. . . . Hail to thee, six-foot
Englishman of the brown eye, worthy
to have carried a six-foot bow at Flod-
den, where England's yeoman triumphed
over Scotland's King, his clans and chiv-
alry. Hail to thee, last of England's
bruisers, after all the many victories
which thou hast achieved — true English
victories, unbought by yellow gold." A
true Briton this ! we exclaim. With all
his fondness for drifting among alien
peoples and tongues, he retained the
ground-anchor of his insular bias ; if
England was, to his mind, full of cant
and nonsense, his heart held that it was
the best of all lands, containing the best
bruisers, the best poets, the best aristo-
cracy, and the best ale in the world.
He was, by his own account, of a mo-
rose and unsocial nature, but we find that
he has no trouble ii. making friends
everywhere, in spite of his blunt manner.
He understood the people he met, in-
stinctively ; and not only as individuals.
His portraits of them are without ex-
aggeration, leisurely, unquestioning, real-
istic in the best sense. His humor is
saturnine. He makes no broad appeal
to the sensibilities, never seduces us into
whimpering, nor cajoles us into hearty
laughter. His immobility often suggests
apathy, but it really expresses his re-
luctance to meddle, — or, perhaps, rather
his extreme independence. Lavengro is
not going to be bothered with opportuni-
ties, either for action or for speech. He
reserves the right to ignore any advances
which Providence may make.
One of my favorites among the minor
figures is that of the old 'ostler. Borrow
might easily have made it more popular-
ly effective by a little coarser method.
He prefers to let the old boy speak for
himself : as he does, at some length.
His directions to Lavengro for making
a journey on horseback, in case he should
ever be a gentleman, and own a horse,
and wish to take such a journey, would
fill some five or six pages of the Atlan-
tic. The tune goes like, this : —
" Before you start, merely give your
horse a couple of handfuls of corn and
a little water, somewhat under a quart,
and if you drink a pint of water your-
self out of the pail, you will feel all the
better during the whole day ; then you
may walk and trot your animal for about
ten miles, till you come to some nice inn,
where you may get down and see your
horse led into a nice stall, telling the
'ostler not to feed him till you come. If
the 'ostler happens to be a dog-fancier,
and has an English terrier-dog like that
of mine there, say what a nice dog it is,
and praise its black and tawn ; and if he
does not happen to be a dog-fancier, ask
him how he 's getting on, and whether
he ever knew worse times ; that kind of
thing will please the 'ostler, and he will
let you do just what you please with your
own horse, and when your back is turned,
he'll say to his comrades what a nice
gentleman you are, and how he thinks he
has seen you before ; then go and sit
down to breakfast, and before you have
finished your breakfast get up and go
and give your horse a feed of corn. . . .
When you have finished your breakfast
and called for the newspaper, go and
water your horse, letting him have one
pailful, then give him .another feed of
corn, and enter into discourse with the
'ostler about bull-baiting, the prime min-
ister, and the like."
One can imagine the gravity with
which Borrow may have listened to this
monologue, and the grim smile with
which he may have set it down.
There is, in the end, no accounting for
the excellence of Sorrow's work except
on the score of pure genius. A merely
remarkable talent could hardly have been
developed by his experience. He knew
too much, for one thing. An acquain-
tance with thirty-odd tongues and dia-
lects, and some sort of contact with as
252
George Borrow.
many literatures, does not conduce to ori-
ginal work. On narrower grounds, a ro-
ver and a linguist is not likely to be master
of one tongue ; yet Borrow is both a mas-
ter of English and a creator of literature.
His style, in the small sense, is not without
relation to the established literary man-
ner of the day. It was a statelier man-
ner than ours ; it was not afraid of being
even eloquent. Apostrophe was one of
its most effective forms, and no modern
English writer, unless De Quincey, has
made such effective use of it as Borrow.
As a mode of condensed retrospective
description, what have we to take its
place in the shamefaced English of our
day ? Borrow evidently rejoiced in it as
an escape-valve for the emotion which
his instinct led him to repress under or-
dinary circumstances.
How shall I make an end without quot-
ing, for the benefit of those hypothetical-
ly ignorant " right people," this and that
cherished passage of description or dia-
logue from the well-thumbed volumes ?
Yet how, if the brake were once let
go, should I make an end at all ? With
one simple little scene I must be con-
tent : —
" ' Young gentleman,' said the huge
fat landlord, ' you are come at the right
time ; dinner will be taken up in a few
minutes, and such a dinner,' he con-
tinued, rubbing his hands, ' as you will
not see every day in these times.'
" ' I am hot and dusty,' said I, ' and
should wish to cool my hands and face.'
" ' Jenny ! ' said the huge landlord,
with the utmost gravity, ' show the gentle-
man into number seven, that he may
wash his hands and face.'
" 'By no means,' said I, ' I am a per-
son of primitive habits, and there is no-
thing like the pump in weather like this.'
" ' Jenny,' said the landlord, with the
same gravity as before, ' go with the
young gentleman to the pump in the back
kitchen, and take a towel along with
you.'
"Thereupon the rosy-faced, clean-look-
ing damsel went to a drawer, and produ-
cing a large, thick, but snowy white towel,
she nodded to me to follow her ; where-
upon I followed Jenny through a long
passage into the back kitchen.
" And at the end of the back kitchen
there stood a pump ; and going to it I
placed my hands beneath the spout, and
said, ' Pump, Jenny ; ' and Jenny incon-
tinently, without laying down the towel,
pumped with one hand, and I washed and
cooled my heated hands.
"And when my hands were washed
and cooled, I took off my neckcloth, and,
unbuttoning my shirt collar, I placed my
head beneath the spout of the pump, and
I said unto Jenny, ' Now, Jenny, lay down
the towel, and pump for your life.'
" Thereupon Jenny, placing the towel
on a linen-horse, took the handle of the
pump with both hands and pumped over
my head as handmaid had never pumped
before ; so that the water poured in tor-
rents from my head, my face, and my
hair, down upon the brick floor.
"And, after the lapse of somewhat
more than a minute, I called out with a
half-strangled voice, ' Hold, Jenny ! ' and
Jenny desisted. I stood for a few mo-
ments to recover my breath, then taking
the towel which Jenny proffered, I dried
composedly my hands and head, my face
and hair ; then, returning the towel to
Jenny, I gave a deep sigh and said,
' Surely this is one of the pleasant mo-
ments of life.' "
Borrow has more intense moods than
this, as well as more trivial ones ; but this
will do to rest upon. It is the mood for
which, after all, one is likely to return
oftenest to the tale of the word - mas-
ter. Manly health and courage, womanly
bloom and strength, the delight of clear
airs, pure waters, hearty fare, and honest
buffets, — these are what Borrow has to
offer. The haunt of his Muse is, it may
be, the pump in the back kitchen ; no mat-
ter : not the Bandusian rill, not smooth-
sliding Mincius, not the very sisters of
Cicero in Maine.
253
Jove's sacred well can put her to shame.
"Surely," says the right person, as, La-
vengro in hand, he settles comfortably
into his evening niche (there is a pile of
new fiction at his elbow which ought to
be looked over, the children have quieted
down, the fire is in good condition, the
cat has stopped fidgeting, and the pipe
draws) : " Surely, this is one of the plea-
sant moments of life."
H. W. Boynton.
CICERO IN MAINE.
WHEN I was a girl attending the high
school, — a when that opens the gate-
way into a magic land of youth, — we
were fortunate enough to have a teach-
er who was, as I heard a college youth
phrase it the other day, " dead stuck on
Latin." It was not simply that this
gifted man had a passion for Latin lit-
erature, but he was, or seemed so to our
youthful imaginations, besotted with the
grammar of the language. No degree
of proficiency or distinction to which we
could attain in the matter of fluent trans-
lations was ever allowed to excuse us
from the daily collection of gems of
knowledge from Andrews's and Stod-
dard's Latin Grammar.
The class of which I was a member
was a small but unique aggregation.
Our teacher had high hopes of classical
triumphs for us because, though our in-
tellectual gifts might not be of surpass-
ing lustre, our critical faculties were ab-
normally developed. The heroic degree
of discipline which enabled the immortal
Light Brigade to feel that it was
" Theirs not to make reply,
Theirs not to reason why,"
would have found no favor in our ranks.
The most uncouth lad in the class, the
least hopeful of success in polite literary
attainments, was the very one, it seems
to me now, who oftenest voiced our unit-
ed conclusions most clearly.
" If we ain't to ask questions, and ain't
to say what we think, what are we goin'
to do ? " he queried ; and one and all felt
that to such a question there could be
but one reply : we were to ask questions,
we were to say what we thought, — for
what else were we in school ?
To this method of pursuing our re-
searches our teacher had no objection
provided we kept within reasonable
bounds, and he had his own way of set-
ting the limits.
" Ain't we ever goin' to git through
studyin' grammar ? " inquired the afore-
mentioned awkward lad, after months
of hope deferred.
" If Mr. Brown thinks he has learned
all the grammar has to impart, perhaps
he will kindly give us a little informa-
tion about its contents," the teacher sug-
gested blandly ; and then followed a ter-
rible ten minutes for Mr. Brown, during
which every vestige of his fancied fa-
miliarity with Andrews and Stoddard
fled from his grasp.
The victim sat down at last baffled,
perspiring, but by no means entirely van-
quished ; no sooner was he seated than
his hand began to wave frantically aloft,
signaling the fact that he had yet a Par-
thian arrow to dispatch.
"Obstupui, steteruntque comae, et vox fauci-
bus haesit,"
he quoted in a quavering voice from
yesterday's lesson, while we looked at
him open-mouthed at such erudition.
" When I 'm all badgered up so, I know
a good deal more 'n I 'pear to be able to
tell."
"It would seem so, Mr. Brown, it
would seem so," the teacher assented
with a darkling glance which warned the
254
Cicero in Maine,
rest of us of sorrow to come, " and there-
in you differ from some of your class-
mates who are often able to tell more
than they can know."
It was owing to this lively, though
shallow, intelligence of ours, and the
facility with which we engrafted pagan
Rome on Puritan New England, that our
instructor was encouraged to jump us
from Caesar to Virgil with no interven-
ing stages. To him, as to Mr. Cooper,
the commentator whose notes assisted our
studies, the reading of Virgil was a joy
of which one could not partake too soon
or too copiously. He expected us to be-
come rapturously interested in the pro-
gress of the story, to enjoy with him the
favorite passages which he rolled out so-
norously for our benefit ; mouth-filling
lines like
"Exoritur clamorque virum clangorque tu-
barum,"
or the softer modulations of
"Sunt lachrymae reruin et mentem mortal ia
tangunt."
Alas, how grievously we disappointed
the good man's hopes ! Virgil's poetic
genius appealed to us little more than
Milton's Paradise Lost would appeal to
a primer class suddenly plunged into its
mysteries. Even when we translated
most glibly we were like creatures
" Moving about in worlds not realised."
The virtues of the pious 2Eneas were of
a variety not mentioned in our Sunday-
school lessons ; we held his seamanship
very cheap ; we had reasons of our own
for doubting the authenticity of the whole
Trojan legend.
" How did they ever git to Troy ? "
our class orator inquired dubiously.
" There wa'n't one in the whole lot 't
knew any more 'bout navigation 'n a fly
in a pan o' milk ! " This was after we
had learned from Mr. Cooper's preface
to Book I that our friend ^neas had
already been roaming the seas for seven
years before presenting himself for the
pleasure of our acquaintance.
From the first we had no use for Dido.
Love was an emotion which had been
mentioned in our hearing, and there were
boys and girls among our number who
" went together," and displayed varying
degrees of what we called " softness " in
so doing ; but that any human creature
could be soft enough deliberately to toast
herself upon a funeral pile, simply because
another human creature sailed away and
left her, was beyond our wildest concep-
tion of the tender passion.
The uncouth lad, who frequently wrote
notes for general circulation among the
girls of the class, issued the following as
soon as Dido's funereal intentions were
announced : —
" Pass this On.
" Dido was a Fool ; how 'd she know
but Eneeus would be Blowed back by the
first Wind ? "
Some of the boys who were studying
Greek originated a sort of class chant,
and the schoolroom for a time resound-
ed during play hours with the ringing
notes of
" Dido, Dido, died ou' doors ! "
As a result of such callousness to all the
tender and lofty emotions, we were at
last transferred to Cicero, and here, for
the first time, we touched solid ground.
We lived in an age when treason and
traitors were matters of recent history,
and philippics were something we were
very familiar with, albeit under a differ-
ent name.
The class lyric, by an easy transition,
blossomed into
" We '11 hang old Cat'line to a sour apple tree,"
and without a dissenting voice we took
the great orator to our homes and hearts.
The teacher, when he discerned our
enthusiasm, and heard the uncouth lad
vociferating genially, " He 's jest givin'
it to the old Cat to-day, ain't he ? " heaved
a sigh, perhaps, over the incomprehen-
sible vagaries of pupils, and wisely ad-
dressed himself to making the most of
the situation.
Cicero in Maine.
255
One Saturday forenoon he brought
Rufus Choate's Eloquence of Revolu-
tionary Periods, and read us what a
great American orator had to say about
the genius of Cicero. Splendid words
they were, these vibrating sentences of
Choate's, and as we listened our eyes
shone and our hearts beat : —
" From that purer eloquence, from
that nobler orator, the great trial of fire
and blood through which the spirit of
Rome was passing had burned and
purged away all things light, all things
gross ; the purple robe, the superb atti-
tude and action, the splendid common-
places of a festal rhetoric, are all laid
by ; the ungraceful, occasional vanity of
adulation, the elaborate speech of the
abundant, happy mind at its ease, all
disappear ; and instead, what directness,
what plainness, what rapidity, what fire,
what abnegation of himself, what disdain,
what hate of the usurper and the usur-
pation, what grand, swelling sentiments,
what fine raptures of liberty, roll and
revel there ! "
On the next declamation day, as soon
as the class orator mounted the platform,
we realized by the light in his dark eyes
that he had something new to offer us.
There never was a more moving speaker
than our class orator. No matter how
many times he declaimed Virginius, —
and, owing to many pressing engage-
ments which swallowed up his time for
learning new " pieces," this happened
with tolerable frequency, — with that
slow, deliberate, musical accent he cap-
tured his audience. At every repetition,
" Over the Alban mountains the light of morn-
ing broke,"
as if it were for us a new birth ; when,
at the critical moment,
" Virginius caught the whittle up and hid it in
his gown,"
we greeted its disappearance with
the same shuddering breath; and that
"hoarse, changed voice" in which he
spake, " Farewell, sweet child, farewell ! "
never lost its magic for tears.
On this well-remembered day, how-
ever, the sorrows of Virginius were for-
gotten ; it was Rufus Choate's magnifi-
cent version of a representative passage
of Cicero's oratory that fell upon our
charmed ears, and we listened to the
swelling tones of the speaker with that
quickened, thrilling breath which marks
the hearer who has surrendered himself
to the emotion of the moment.
" Lay hold on this opportunity of our
salvation, conscript fathers — by the im-
mortal gods I conjure you! — and re-
member that you are the foremost men
here, in the council chamber of the whole
earth. Give one sign to the Roman
people that even now as they pledge their
valor, so you pledge your wisdom to the
crisis of the state," — thus the appeal
opened. It was the ageless cry for liberty,
the cry that is the same yesterday, to-
day, and forever.
" Born to glory and to liberty, let us
hold these distinctions fast, or let us
greatly die!" — these are words that
belong to every century and to every race
of men. We did not know how to for-
mulate what we felt, but it was a moment
when Bull Run and Gettysburg, that
worn face of Abraham Lincoln, and all
the unmarked graves on Southern battle-
fields confused themselves within us in
some indefinable passion, and took hold
on the heroic memories of ancient Rome.
— a moment when, as in all the high
impulses of life, the barriers of time and
place were melted away.
I believe, as I look back now, that our
first conscious inspiration toward what
was best in literature and noblest in
statesmanship took root from that time.
We were living in strenuous days of re-
construction after a great war, and the
air was still full of battle echoes, but we
drank in the influences of the hour as
unheedingly as a plant drinks the sun-
shine and the dew ; it needed this breath
from ancient Rome to shape the cumu-
lative forces within us into the beginnings
of American citizenship.
256
Cicero in Maine.
No healthy young creature realizes
the process of his own growth, but many
of us can vaguely remember the period
when
" those first affections
Those shadowy recollections,
Which, be they what they may,
Are yet the fountain light of all our day,
Are yet a master light of all our seeing,"
first reminded our bodies of the souls that
dwelt mysteriously within. We received
that reminder noisily or undemonstra-
tively according to our varying tempera-
ments, but in each one of us, none the
less, life marked the hour when a new
epoch began.
The regular daily session of the school
closed at half-past four in the afternoon,
but from that time until five o'clock a
dark-faced, sweet-voiced woman, with
what seemed to us a marvelous twist to
her tongue, gave instruction in French
to the ambitious few who aspired to a
knowledge of that polished language.
There was the girl who learned easily
and forgot everything, the girl who
learned ploddingly and forgot nothing,
and another, still, who seems to me now
the farthest away of all, although there
are buoyant hours when her once over-
flowing youth and bounding vitality re-
turn to her pulses like the resurrection of
a lost joy.
Of the three male members — for the
class was a well-balanced one — the class
orator and the uncouth lad constituted
two, and the third was the genius of the
school, the only scholar, perhaps, whose
intuitions leaped unerringly to the goal,
who saw a subject whole, and wrested
the inwardness from it while the rest of
us were laboriously pondering its earliest
developments. Just why the uncouth
lad elected to study the French language
I could not then comprehend, though I
have often told myself that the mere re-
collection of his recitations added a dis-
tinct flavor to life.
He himself accounted for his presence
in the class by the statement that " as
he took care o' the schoolhouse he might's
well be recitin' French as doin' nothin',
seein' as he 'd got to stay anyway; "
and to behold the vital interest whicli he
displayed in the sugar and spice of the
grocer, or the mahogany table of the
cabinet maker, was only one degree less
joy-inspiring than when he announced,
giving to each syllable its full value,
" Jay lese belles pantou-flees de ma belle-
mare," or clothed himself gayly in the
ribbons of his father-in-law.
It was when the French recitation had
ended, however, and the old brick school-
house was left to our undisturbed pos-
session, that we sat around the great
sheet-iron stove, with no light but the
red blur of the setting sun through the
western windows, and told all things that
ever we knew. On one Tuesday after-
noon in particular, I remember, the talk
began with that tale of the celebrated
wooden horse which Virgil makes .^EneaS
tell as a sort of after-dinner story in the
second book of the ./Eneid. Our teacher,
always hoping against hope that he might
some day interest us in his beloved Virgil,
had that afternoon been dwelling on the
great poet's talent as a raconteur.
It is needless to say that we rejected
the whole narrative as puerile. The
school genius, indeed, made some modi-
fying reflections in regard to the primi-
tiveness of the age in which the decep-
tion was located. " I s'pose we ought
to consider " — he began deprecating-
ly, but the uncouth lad brusquely inter-
rupted, —
" We ain't got to consider nothin', " he
declared, " except that the' wa'n't any
last one of 'em 't had any more head 'n
a carpet tack."
" A wooden hoss," the class orator
sneered, taking up the theme ; — " poh !
't would n't fool a baby. My little
brother had one for a Christmas present,
an' 't would n't go into his stockin', so
mother took an' hitched it on with a
string."
" I '11 bait ye, sir," the uncouth lad
Cicero in Maine.
257
declaimed oratorically, " that we could
n't 'a' fooled the rebels with any wooden
hoss when we was tryin' to take Rich-
mond. If they 'd seen us drawin' off an'
leavin' any such contrivance round to
hitch to their stockin', they 'd said, ' No,
thank ye. We ain't keepin' Christmas
this year, an' if we was, the Yankees ain't
no Santy Glaus.' "
" What do you think," asked the girl
who was quick to learn, " of the man that
came into school to-day ? " It was a part
of her adaptability that she knew how to
change a subject in season to prevent it
from growing threadbare.
We lived within two miles of the State
capitol, and in all the high moments of
life we felt ourselves enhaloed by the
shadow of its dome. The state legisla-
ture was in session, and our visitor that
day had been one of the members of this
august body. Our generation was much
less sophisticated than the present up-
to-date class of young people, and for
us very simple things frequently assumed
heroic proportions. To our admiring
eyes this visitor was not a mere country
lawyer, with that taste for the literature
of Latin which many country lawyers used
to possess ; he was a wise and powerful
being, who created laws out of his inner
consciousness, and hobnobbed with prin-
cipalities and powers, and we venerated
him accordingly. The teacher had in-
formed him of our intimacy with Cicero,
and when, at the close of the recitation,
the great man " addressed " us, he had
the acumen to leave the ordinary plati-
tudes unsaid, and draw from the Roman
orator's life and words the message of
that nobler patriotism, that larger citizen-
ship, whose ideal forever appeals to ar-
dent souls with the thrill of a passion for
which men have been content to die.
When the girl who was quick to learn
recalled our visitor to our minds the
thrill came back too, and our eyes turned
toward the red streamers in the darken-
ing west, as if they were the banners of
victory beckoning us on.
VOL. xciu. — NO. 556. 17
" Le 's go up to the legislature to-mor-
row," the slow girl suddenly suggested,
seized by an unwonted inspiration ; and
with one accord we assented, for Wednes-
day afternoon would be a holiday.
When, next day, we met at the ap-
pointed hour for our long walk, the af-
ternoon seemed to have been created for
our purpose. It was one of those clear,
bracing winter days when the snowy
path echoes crisply under one's tread,
and snow and sky melt into a dazzle,
whose blended light and color is empha-
sized by the dark shapes of feathery pine
and fir trees.
It must not be thought that our lit-
tle company dallied along in couples
absorbed in any sentimental discourse.
On the contrary, we marched by threes,
the boys leading the way, the girls
briskly keeping pace. The road which
we followed was then, and to me is to
this day, filled with childhood memories
of " the war," and it was of these things
that we discoursed as we went along.
That commonplace-looking, hip-roofed
farmhouse had been the military pest-
house, and awesome associations lingered
around it still ; in yonder field a battery
had once encamped, and one of the girls
related the story of how, at the venture-
some age of twelve, she, with several
companions of equally mature years,
having wandered within the limits of
the camp, had been promptly arrested
and haled before the commanding offi-
cer, the terrors of whose cross-examina-
tion had been little mitigated by roars
of laughter from surrounding listeners.
The echoes of marching infantry and
the beating hoofs of cavalry horses
seemed to us hardly to have died from
the air, and when we reached the State
House at last we were keyed for heroic
doings.
The capitol building of our native
state was to us, in those days, the grand-
est structure in the world. I confess
here that it has never lost its ancient
charm for me. It stands on high
258
Cicero in Maine.
ground, and I have seen its dome blur
grandly into many sunrises and sunsets ;
when one begins to mount the succes-
sive flights of broad, granite steps that
lead to the majestic front entrance, one
begins to say to one's '' inward ear,"
" Here is a centre of deeds ; here events
are shaped for good or ill ; " and the fact
that many of these shapings are trivial
in themselves — sometimes, indeed, ill-
shaped — does not altogether rob them
of their significance in the eternal frame-
work of things.
As we entered the rotunda that day,
our footsteps resounding on the floor
seemed almost an impertinence. We
lingered to look at the portraits of the
old-time governors in their gay coats ;
we paused in sincere homage before the
clustering battle-flags, which were then
being gathered into the State House as
their last, honored resting-place. A
copy of Moses Owen's stirring poem,
the Returned Maine Battle-Flags, hung
beside the sacred relics, and the class
orator could not resist the opportunity to
thrill us with its music. As he read he
forgot himself and the place, and more
than one hurrying foot checked itself at.
the sound, as if a sentinel had called
"Halt!"
" As the word is given — they charge ! they
form !
And the dim hall rings with the battle's
storm !
And once again through the smoke and strife
Those colors lead to a nation's life."
After numerous digressions we reached
the gallery of the House of Representa-
tives, and hung over the rail gazing at
the mighty men below. The triviality
of the subjects under discussion might,
had we been maturer auditors, have
served to dampen our heroic mood, but
to us it was all mysteriously large and
significant. When two honorable mem-
bers chanced to indulge in lively recrim-
ination, the uncouth lad was observed
to murmur as in meditation, " How
long, O Catiline," — the familiar phrase
which had become to us like a household
word.
Once during the afternoon a large,
blond young man, with a cherubic vis-
age, rose in answer to a question, and
drawled forth a reply which commanded
the instant and amused attention of the
house.
•' That 's Tom Reed," we heard some-
body say, and we looked with quick-
ened interest at a speaker who had al-
ready begun to make himself felt as a
power.
By and by there was a stir in the rear
of the great hall as loitering men in the
corridor greeted a fresh comer. Now
Cicero was indeed among us ! We all
knew that erect form, with the head gal-
lantly thrown back, and the keen, dark
eyes that had not then learned to ques-
tion Fate otherwise than blithely ; the
eyes that had ever a smile of quick re-
cognition, as we well knew, for every
boy and girl to whom their glance had
been directed. It was little wonder that
we all loved Mr. Blaine, — there was
much about him that was supremely
lovable.
The usual routine of a visit to the
State House included the climbing of the
winding stairs which led to the cupola,
to assure ourselves that Kennebec County
remained securely anchored below ; but,
on this occasion, as the short winter af-
ternoon was waning fast, we contented
ourselves with a visit to the massive
stone balcony which opens from the sec-
ond story. A tinge of rosy light was
already reflected in the eastern sky, and
a few ambitious stars had begun to
show themselves. In front of us lay the
" state grounds," which had so lately
been a bustling camp, empty now and
solitary save where a marble shaft glim-
mered whitely to mark the spot where
some departed statesman had wrapped
the drapery of his couch about him and
lain down to pleasant dreams. Even the
glimmering line of the river was white,
too. As we stood at the balustrade's
Cicero in Maine.
259
edge, brooding over the landscape, life
thrilled large within us, life uncompre-
hended, unformulated, the full cup, the
fulfilled dream, which seem wholly pos-
sible only to the hopefulness of youth.
When the
" whole soul revolves, the cup runs over,
The world and life 's too big to pass for a
dream."
A large bird rose slowly in the distant
sky, his wings showing black against the
clear ether. " It 's funny, too," the
genius said, thinking aloud ; " the Roman
eagles, the American eagle, — and those
old chaps thought their birds were the
emblems o' freedom jest as we think ours
is ! Well, I don' know 's I 'd change
James G. Blaine for old Cicero."
In the middle of the Latin recitation
next day the uncouth lad inquired ab-
ruptly, " What ever became o' him, any-
how, — I mean what end did he make ? "
The teacher stared for a moment, un-
comprehending. " Oh, you mean Cic-
ero ? "
"Course," the uncouth one replied
laconically.
Then the teacher — how fortunate it
was for us that this wise man always
knew how to seize the heart of an oppor-
tunity— gave us a brief sketch of the
great Roman's life, showing us how his
true nobleness overbalanced his politi-
cal weaknesses and vanity. He — the
teacher — " knew a man " who had vis-
ited Tusculum and seen the spot where
the ruins of Cicero's villa still stand, with
the great ivy tree growing against the
sunny wall. He told us of the neighbors
whose country houses surrounded Cic-
ero's dwelling, — Caesar, Pompey, Bru-
tus, the poet Catullus, Lucullus, cele-
brated for his feasts, with whom Cicero
used to exchange books, — names these
were to conjure with. He told us, too, of
our hero's beloved daughter, his little
Tullia, and her early death ; and he made
it all more real by reminding us that this
was the same Tusculum with whose long,
" white streets " we were so familiar in
Macaulay's poem. Here the class 'ora-
tor's lips began to move, and we knew
that he was muttering dumbly, —
" From the white streets of Tusculum,
The proudest town of all."
He had often declaimed it.
When the narrator went on to describe
how Cicero, betrayed and deserted, was
finally assassinated, the fatal blow being
struck by a man whom he had formerly
defended, the uncouth lad, forgetting the
dignity of the place and hour, brought his
hand down on his knee with a resound-
ing smack, and declared in quivering
tones, " I call it gol-darned mean ! "
All this passed years ago. The girl
who was quick to learn and the school
genius both heard the call early in life
to that land where naught but evil is
ever forgotten, and where insight is di-
vine and eternal. The girl who never
forgot has spent her powers in patiently
bestowing her accumulations on others ;
the class orator has disseminated his
gifts of language through the pen rather
than the persuasive voice ; and it was,
after all, the uncouth lad, uncouth no
longer, magnificent in stature and in
wisdom, who, on a well-remembered day,
rolled grandly forth that noble address
on Christian Citizenship.
There was a lump in my throat when
I heard him say, " My own first con-
scious impulse towards making a good
citizen of myself dates from the time
when I was awkwardly but enthusiasti-
cally translating Cicero's orations in the
old brick schoolhouse in my native town.
I was fortunate enough to begin the
study of Latin under a teacher who
taught with the spirit and the under-
standing also, and who had the magnetic
power of making his pupils realize that
every great language possesses a soul as
well as an anatomy."
When I stood before that former un-
couth lad at the close of his discourse,
and saw him look at me questioningly, as
one who dimly divines a ghost of the
260
Cynicism.
past, I said to him, — since it is generally
wiser to laugh than to cry, — " Avez-
vous les pantoufles de velours de I'e'pi-
cier ? "
He seized my hand in a mighty grasp
of recognition and welcome : " I have,
— and those of the butcher and baker
and candlestick-maker as well. The wo-
men in my parish were always sending
'em to me before I was married."
But, when all is said, the true link be-
tween us, in the new as in the old day,
was something in which the grocer's vel-
vet slippers had little part : that which
made our old school days worth remem-
bering, the image which shaped itself in
both our minds as we stood there, —
" One and one with a shadowy third,"
was that of the wise schoolmaster, who
had known how to draw us into the
grand circle where old Rome and young
America, all nations, indeed, and all
races of men, were made one and indi-
visible in the deathless continuity of a
moral ideal.
Martha Baker Dunn.
CYNICISM.
ONE of the seeming waywardnesses
of our human nature is the respect for a
cynic that lurks in nearly every heart.
The respect is not for his character,
certainly not for his disposition ; but it
goes out to him as a man of intellect,
and is often disproportionate to his abil-
ity. To hear that a man is cynical is to
accept him as of superior intelligence.
There is a universal deference to what
is universally deemed an unlovely and
undesirable attitude of mind. The en-
trance of the cynic into the drawing-
room produces an air of expectant in-
terest ; his rancorous comments are re-
ceived as admirable wit. So, at least,
according to the contemporary novels of
society ; so, even, — though in a some-
what less obvious and artificial manner,
— according to one's own observation.
We all find more interesting the person
who discusses his friend's failings than
him who dwells upon his friend's vir-
tues. We do not like the cynic better,
but we regard him as the more pene-
trating, and the better informed.
Hence we find him excellent com-
pany. For instance : Brown takes pains
to make a pleasant impression on those
whom he meets, and, in the ordinary re-
lations of life, gets on with his acquain-
tances and friends very comfortably.
When, therefore, the cynical observer
shrugs his shoulders and intimates some-
thing to Brown's discredit, the idea has
for those who know Brown the charm of
novelty, and adorns him with a new in-
terest. Having never before held him
in discredit, they feel that his detractor
has got below the surface. The convic-
tion is strengthened by the cynic's air of
mental reservation, his unwillingness to
utter definitely what he knows, his man-
ner that implies, " Oh yes, all very well,
but I could tell things if I would."
This, however, is not the only cause
that contributes to the general deference.
If one man declares a person to be
charming, fascinating, or delightful, and
another pronounces him disgusting, re-
pulsive, or intolerable, who makes the
more profound impression ? The lan-
guage of enthusiasm is emasculate com-
pared with that of hatred or contempt.
A sufficient reason for the undemon-
strative nature of the English-speaking
race lies in the effeminate quality of the
adjectives that denote admirable traits.
Some of them can hardly be uttered
without a consciousness of a loss of
Cynicism.
261
virility. One has only to contrast with
them the hearty gusto of our vocabulary
of dislike and depreciation to perceive
the tremendous advantage that the cynic
enjoys.
His very name supports his preten-
sions to a superior intelligence. " Cynic,"
for all that it meant originally " dog-
like," is an aristocratic word. One is
not prone to think of coal heavers, sail-
ors, miners, as cynics ; it has probably
occurred to but few that their grocers
and butchers are cynics. The word is
erudite and Greek ; the presumption is
that the man designated by a term of
such distinguished lineage is of education
— and intelligence. We have a habit
of deriving ideas in this illogical way.
The cynics in the humbler walks of life
are not regarded as cynics, but as men
soured and disappointed. And when we
hear of one that he is soured and disap-
pointed, we do not instinctively pay trib-
ute to his intelligence.
Is there, then, no wisdom in cynicism,
no virtue in disbelief ? Does the un-
doubted suggestion of intelligence which
the word implies rest entirely upon such
trivial and empty grounds ? Unques-
tionably the inner respect which persists,
notwithstanding the superficial condem-
nation, proceeds from a dim recognition
of certain useful services that cynicism
does perform. An attempt to discover
these and set them forth fairly need not
disturb even the most believing.
A reasonable cynicism affords recrea-
tion to the mind. A man may always,
with advantage to his mental health, in-
dulge in a cynicism as a hobby ; he may,
for instance, be cynical of women, or
newspapers, or party politics, or the pub-
lishers of novels, and be the better for it.
But he is in a serious state if his cyni-
cism includes women and newspapers and
party politics and the publishers of nov-
els. Then, indeed, is his outlook bleak
and barren, and, in all probability, he
lives and works only to malign ends.
Nearly all sane, normal people, how-
ever, enjoy one cynicism by way of di-
version. It is, indeed, essential to char-
acter to have some object at which to
scoff, swear, or sneer. Cynicism is never
a native quality of the mind ; it always
has its birth in some unhappy experi-
ence. The young man finds that the
girl who has gathered up for him all the
harmony and melody of earth rings hol-
low at the test ; and he drops his lyrical
language and becomes cynical of women.
The citizen of Boston has naturally
grown cynical of newspapers. The can-
didate for public office who has been de-
finitely retired to private life by being
" knifed " at the polls distrusts party
politics. A man publishes a novel and
thenceforth is cynical of the publishers
of novels. Yet these misfortunes have
their salutary aspect. The disappointed
lover, generalizing bitterly upon the sex,
is not always implacable ; a cooler judg-
ment tempers and restores his passion,
gives it another object, and so guides him
to a safer, if less gusty and emotional
love. The citizen of Boston, the be-
trayed candidate, the blighted young
novelist, all have for their condition, even
though they know it not, a valuable com-
pensation ; for the very experience that
has brought them to this pass of reason-
able cynicism has stirred their indigna-
tion; yes, in spite of their seeming in-
ertness, indignation is now smouldering.
And this is a great force ; slow though it
may be to start the wheels of machinery,
it is still an important fuel in keeping
alive the fires under the boilers of civili-
zation. The faculty of it becomes dulled
by disuse, and is the more alert and
righteous for a little rasping. How im-
pressive and commanding a quality in a
man is that of a great potential indigna-
tion ! It is essential to the chieftain. He
may never show more than the flash of an
eye, yet that will serve. And such power
of indignation never came to one who
had not penetrated some large bland
sham, and learned thereby to hate and
disbelieve all its seductive kindred.
262
Cynicism.
In supplying one with a theme for
indignation, the turn toward cynicism
furnishes also an additional amusement
and charm. If a man is in the habit,
for example, of expecting nothing but
tales of murder, suicide, and scandal on
the first page of his newspaper, he be-
comes actually pleased at the rich daily
reward of his expectations. " Scurrilous
sheet ! " he cries, striking it with open
palm. To behold, morning after morn-
ing, its recurring off ensiveness and hypoc-
risy, to feel that there are less discern-
ing persons who approve of the very
features that make it despicable, and to
exclaim to himself, " So this is what the
public likes ! " brings him each time
a curious * satisfaction. Perhaps it is
merely the satisfaction of a small grati-
fied vanity, but it enables him to begin
his day in a comfortable frame of mind ;
he is prepared to snarl only at news-
papers. It is desirable that every man
should have a small vanity gratified
daily ; it keeps him in good temper with
himself and the world. And to observe
small vanities and foibles in others per-
forms this service, since a man always
absolves himself from sharing the weak-
nesses that he sees.
Yet cynicism has a more valuable end
than merely to amuse. It is a means to-
ward sturdiness and independence in a
man ; it quickens his activities, and pre-
vents a too ready acceptance of exist-
ing conditions. It is almost necessary to
important achievement. The reverential
frame of mind is inefficient when con-
fronted with the world's work ; too much
in the problems of life demands not to
be reverenced, but to be cursed. There
can be no useful and permanent building
up without a clearing of the site ; old
foundations and debris have to be swept
away. The man of reverential mind,
who has no touch of cynicism, is unfit
for this work. He is unfit, for instance,
to serve as district attorney in one of our
large cities, — as useful a function as
an educated man may perform, yet one
in the performance of which the man
of entirely reverential spirit would be
harmfully employed. The reverential
spirit, contemplative of the established
order, crowds out capacity for initia-
tive ; the cynical spirit, scouting the es-
tablished order, stimulates initiative. Of
this spirit have been the great reformers,
men for whom Swift, in defining his own
life, has supplied a motto : " The chief
end of all my labor is to vex the world
rather than to divert it." It was charac-
teristic of Cromwell that in dissolving
the Long Parliament he should display
a wanton cynicism. " My Lord Gen-
eral, lifting the sacred mace itself, said,
' What shall we do with this bauble ?
Take it away ! ' ' ' The scorn with which
he disposed of the revered symbol of
majesty was in itself symbolic ; as the
Cavalier had been cynical of the Puri-
tan's piety, so was the Puritan cynical
of the pomp and trappings of the Cava-
lier.
The great rulers, like the great re-
formers, have had the cynical sense, and
have in the same way derived from it,
not paralysis, but an effective reckless-
ness. Louis XIV, most brilliant of mon-
archs, observed in making an appoint-
ment to office, " J'aifait dix mScontents
et un ingrat" And he continued to ap-
point whom he pleased. Frederick the
Great was the pupil of Voltaire ; and
when a Board of Religion came to him
with a complaint that certain Roman
Catholic schools were used for sectarian
purposes, he bade them remember that
" in this country every man must get to
heaven his own way." The ruthless cyn-
icism of Peter the Great was supple-
mented by the splendid constructive
hopefulness from which issued his say-
ing, " I built St. Petersburg as a window
to let in the light of Europe."
Yet we need not go to history for illus-
tration ; even in one's own experience it
is not difficult to note the efficiency which
a vein of cynicism, properly combined
with other qualities, gives a man. Those
Cynicism.
263
who are regarded as successful, or as
being on the road to success, are cheerful,
hopeful persons, with just this slightly
cynical outlook. Those who have failed,
or are failing, are just as surely the utter-
ly cynical, the decayed, querulous, and
embittered, or the supremely reveren-
tial, who have too much respect for things
as they are to undertake any altera-
tion. These are the indolent ; they may
work hard all their lives, yet are they
none the less indolent mentally, and un-
alert.
There is, indeed, what may be called
the cynical sense, not to be confused
with the sense of humor, though akin to
it. It is this which enables a man to
keep out of the stock market, and, even
more, to look without jealousy on the
achievements of those who are in the
stock market. It is the antiseptic sense.
So far from promoting envy, malice, and
uncharitableness, it is allied with sympa-
thy. For sympathy means understand-
ing, and there can be no true understand-
ing if one does not detect the weaknesses
as well as the virtues ; without this cyni-
cal sense, one has not humanity. It gives
a man a lively and discriminating inter-
est in life ; it guards him against the par-
alyzing vice of hero - worship, — which
is a virtue only in the young and imma-
ture, — and against the more sinful fault
of arrogance toward the dejected and
beaten. For just as it enables him to
see how trivial are even the greatest
achievements of human ingenuity and
labor, with what little loss the work of
even the best and wisest might have been
omitted in the progress of the world,
so, also, it prevents him from being un-
duly scornful of those who have accom-
plished — for all that appears on the sur-
face — nothing. Seeing a man who has
failed, the cynically minded wonders
what accidents of birth and circumstance
imposed his f ruitlessness upon him ; see-
ing a man who has succeeded, the cynic
wonders if he had done so without the
innumerable reinforcements of chance.
If this view tends toward fatalism, so
does it also toward democracy.
Yet one's cynicism must always be
tempered in its sentiment and limited in
its scope. A man may profitably be
cynical of women, yet his faith and loy-
alty to at least one woman — his mother,
or his sister, or the woman he loves —
must be unswerving and unquestioning.
A man may not be cynical of children,
or with children. He cannot be cynical
of friends, and keep them. He must
not grow cynical of himself, for then
nothing remains. And the danger of
cynicism is that once admitted into a
man it may grow, appropriating one
after another of his channels and outlets,
narrowing his hopes and enthusiasms,
until finally it rots the man himself.
Reasonably limited and kept within
bounds, it is a source of strength to a
man rather than of weakness ; it gives
him an independent and self-respecting
point of view ; it berates him if he tends
toward a weak sentimentality ; it is the
companion of a cheerful levity. Take
their cynical outlook away from Heine
and Goethe and Victor Hugo, from Swift
and Johnson and Franklin, — and how
flavorless would be what remained !
How insipid would be a literature in
which wit and humor had to disport them-
selves entirely among the pleasant facts
of life !
Arthur Stanwood Pier.
264 The Book-Lover.
THE BOOK-LOVER.
I LOVE a book, if there but run
From title-page to colophon
Something sincere that sings or glows,
Whate'er the text be, rhyme or prose.
And high-perched on some window-seat,
Or in some ingle-side retreat,
Or in an alcove consecrate
To lore and to the lettered great,
For happiness I need not look
Beyond the pages of my book.
Yea, I believe that, like an elf,
I'd be contented with a shelf,
If thereupon with me might sit
Some work of wisdom or of wit
Whereto, at pleasure, I might turn,
And the fair face of Joy discern !
I love a book, — its throbbing heart !
And while I may not hold the art
That dresses it in honor scant, —
The tree-calf " tooled " or " crushed " Levant, —
Rather a rare soul, verily,
Than a bedizened husk for me !
So, though no Midas' magic hands
To gold transmute my barren sands,
Though friendly Fame deign not to lay
About my brows the vine and bay,
Though fond eyes marry not with mine,
Nor lip to lip give sacred sign,
The core of all content I know,
A blessing that is balm for woe ;
On life with level gaze I look,
And all because I love — a book !
Clinton Scollard.
Books New • and Old.
265
BOOKS NEW AND OLD.
OLD WINE IN NEW BOTTLES.
THE ancient disputation between the
Body and the Soul gives rise — in a
fanciful mind at least — to a curious
conception of the world of books. In
that fresh and vigorous inaugural lec-
ture, wherewith the present professor of
poetry at Oxford took up his torch,
there is a text, apt to the elaboration
of this view. " An actual poem," said
Mr. Bradley, " is the succession of expe-
riences — sounds, images, thoughts, emo-
tions — through which we pass when we
are reading as poetically as we can." 1
So, one might say by way of inference, an
actual book is the train of various and
connected pleasures which we enjoy on
a long winter's evening by the fire, or
under Jove on a summer's day, as we
peruse from top to bottom one of the
inky, multitudinously split parallelepi-
peds miscalled a volume. It is a queer
realm of phantasmagoria to which this de-
finition leads us ; the idealistically mind-
ed reader may wander there at his own
sweet will, while the pedestrian reviewer
goes his ways.
In appraising some of the more not-
able new editions of the past year, upon
which the publishers have expended
time and money and taste in the en-
deavor to make them beautiful and fit,
this old notion of the ideality of letters
will cheer and guide us. Yet the true
book-lover is no mere Platonick, any
more than he is of that Epicurean Stye,
where large-paper editions quite virgin
of the paper-knife go down to a forlorn
decay. He is one who is peculiarly
aware of the temperament of books, —
1 Poetry for Poetry's Sake. By A. C. BRAD-
LET. Oxford : The Clarendon Press. 1901.
2 The Marble Faun. By NATHANIEL HAW-
THORNE. (The Unit Books, No. 1.) New
York: Bell. 1903.
that misty mid-region where Soul and
Body, the Actual Book and its format,
blend in an individuality as of a person.
Such an one knows well how appreciably
the fit embodiment adds to his joy in a
beloved author; his first care with the
new edition of an old author is to read
it through ; and with him the consider-
ation of the beauty and fitness of its
form is always secondary to his plea-
sure in the Actual Book, and to his in-
terest in determining whether there has
been any change in the quality of this
pleasure since last he felt it, — and, if
there has been, the reasons and the ex-
tent of the change.
There has been in recent years no
more interesting and revolutionary ven-
ture in publishing than that which is
now giving life to the so-called Unit
Books.2 The scheme calls for a series
of reprints of classical and entertaining
works at the uniform price of one cent
for each unit of twenty-five pages, with
a slight addition for variation in bind-
ing. The first two volumes, The Marble
Faun, and Lincoln's" Letters and Ad-
dresses, are, in many respects, admir-
able specimens of book -making. The
paper and letter-press are decent and
comely, the binding in good taste, and
the editorial notes more than ordinarily
intelligent and useful. Yet though the
Actual Books are there, the true book-
lover, who is always something of a
whimsicalist, is likely to find the vol-
umes lacking in temperament, and the
Letters and Addresses of Abraham Lincoln.
(The Unit Books, No. 2.) New York : Bell.
1903.
266
Books New and Old.
melancholy product of a machine-made
age. In the little stock-company theatre
under his shabby hat some such comedy
as this is sure to be enacted : —
PERSONS OF THE DRAMA : MERCATOR ;
BIBLIOPHILUS.
Scene: Mercator's Book Emporium.
Mercator solus, to him Biblio-
philus.
Mercator. Good-morning, Bibliophi-
lus, how can I serve you this morning,
sir ?
Bibliophilus. Cut me off four pounds
of fiction, if you please, and trim me up
a dozen essays.
Mercator. Very good, sir ; anything
else, sir?
Bibliophilus. No, but let me tell you
that if you send me any more short-
weight histories, as you did day before
yesterday, I shall take my patronage
elsewhere.
Mercator. The history was an even
nine pounds, sir, as you ordered.
Bibliophilus. It was not !
Mercator. I will speak to my clerks,
sir.
(Excursions and alarums, and final-
ly exit Bibliophilus, drawing his cloak
about him, and tapping the ground
feverishly with his stick as if in agi-
tation.)
We may imagine that Bibliophilus
does, indeed, take his patronage else-
where, — and most of his ilk with him,
— while the book-butcher continues to
make a living, and a fat one, by catering
to the needs of Scholasticus, Viator, and
Bibliothecarius. So let us leave them
1 The Works of Charles Lamb. Edited by
WILLIAM MACDONALD. In twelve volumes.
Vol. I. The Essays of Elia. Vol. II. Critical
Essays. Vol. III. Last Essays of Elia. Lon-
don : J. M. Dent & Co. ; New York: E. P. But-
ton & Co. 1903.
2 Not the least admirable and desirable of
the reprints of the year is Mr. Ingpen's new
edition of this same Autobiography, — that
" pious, ingenious, altogether human and
worthy book," as the atrabiliar, honest old
with their units and the rest, and pass
with Bibliophilus to the perusal of cer-
tain newly reprinted volumes wherein
writings more than ordinarily savored
with the salt of personality have been
embodied in forms which pretend to a
like distinction.
n.
At the risk of having some Lamb-like
reader wishful to " get at our bumps,"
we may venture the truism that in all
literature there is no book more vitally
instinct with the pure essence of per-
sonality than the Essays of Elia.1 Mr.
MacDonald has endeavored in his new
and complete edition of Lamb to pro-
duce a definitive edition, comporting
with the individuality of the author. As
an announcer Mr. MacDonald interests
us a good deal. The superior complete-
ness of his own edition is proclaimed,
perhaps a bit too noisily, but he has
gathered into his set much that the lover
of Lamb would not willingly forgo. It
is pleasant, for example, to know that
he is to forsake the narrow path of pre-
vious editors and include among Lamb's
complete works some minor pieces ex-
cluded by Mr. Ainger's modesty, as well
as the lovely volume of Poetry for Chil-
dren. As Leigh Hunt wrote, in that
charming passage of his Autobiography 2
where the character of Lamb is painted
with so tender a detachment, " he was
a great acquaintance of the little chil-
dren," and his selective instinct in
choosing their poetry is in the highest
degree sound and fine, and significant
of character.
Sage of Chelsea called it. Thornton Hunt's
additions to his father's story are printed with-
in brackets continuously with the text ; Mr.
Ingpen's own biographical annotation is terse
and helpful ; and the two stately, parchment-
backed octavos, with their many excellent
portraits, are as judiciously made up as the
most difficult Bibliophilus could desire.
The Autobiography of Leigh Hunt. Newly
edited by ROGER INGPEN. 2 vols. New York :
E. P. Button & Co. 1903.
Books New and Old.
267
Mr. MacDonald's Memoir of Lamb,
which attains the proportion of a re-
spectable short biography, is a very hon-
est and virile piece of writing. His
Gaelic sportiveness, both here and in
his excellent ample notes, does not always
consort quite amicably with the Celtic
playfulness of Lamb. Some of his face-
tiae come but lamely off, and one likes
to imagine how Elia (to filch yet another
phrase from Hunt) would have " pelted
his head with pearls." He is addicted,
too, to the use of passing queer words in
what he seems to think the manner of
his author ; and he accomplishes the ses-
quipedalian by the sheer strength of his
bootstraps, with none of the tender, hu-
morsome irony which makes Lamb's dal-
liance with big, old words so charming.
We are presented with many a morsel
like this : "... an extreme example,
this, of flagrant intrusion, of unseason-
able ebullition ; rapscallion irruption of
the mere quotidian mortal "... Yes,
indeed ! Yet we like the fellow.
For all his noise, Mr. MacDonald's is
in many respects the best brief life of
Lamb that we have had. No other paints
so convincingly, and with so little of
mere quavering sentimentality, the som-
breness and horror that made the warp
of Lamb's life. It reads like a Greek
tragedy of love and madness and valiant
renunciation. Some months before the
letters to Myra Kelly had been made
public, Mr. MacDonald, by a curious
piece of biographic insight, had recon-
structed the episode, and woven a new
tragic factor into the story of Elia's life.
No one, not even Walter Pater, has writ-
ten better of the transmutation of these
tragic forces into the finest humor in the
world ; and how searching and sombre is
this statement of Lamb's cbaracteristic
view of the world : —
"The problematical was too continu-
ously a dweller in his own house — the
need to justify the ways of God to man,
even as seen in the history of one inno-
cent woman, was too often forced upon
his attention — for him to have any de-
light in the expatiations of adipose piety
or the philosophic earnestness that never
knew a grief. Existence for him and
for Mary had been a gift too fateful and
dark, too fraught with a burden of ques-
tions that could only be answered by
tears, for him ever to refer with large
assurance to those common topics of
everybody else — of the meanings of
life, and the nature of man, and the
ascertained destiny of the world. He
drew instinctively toward the particular
things and the comradeships of the earth :
the old places, and the old books, and
the full-flavored passages of old writing
in them ; but especially towards those
human relationships, of which not the in-
telligence but the sympathies are the in-
terpreter, the sanction, and the proof."
Yet Charles Lamb was no mere dim
doubter, no mere vague-eyed seeker of
sympathy. His was a head, as Leigh
Hunt declared, worthy of Aristotle or of
Bacon. We like best to leave him in
the light of Mr. MacDonald's final char,
acterization, which is quite in accord with
that of his masculine admirers every-
where, — a pure intellect fit to be com-
pared with the greatest, a writer of the
finest and richest prose, and the brav-
est man in the history of English let-
ters.
What a pleasure it would be to read
Lamb in folio, so that the eye might have
that luxurious sense of covering ground as
it moves along the amplitude of the lines !
Yet as no publisher has seen fit to give
us a fourteen-inch Elia, we may well be
grateful for the present light and distin-
guished edition, with its excellent print-
ing and dainty binding, — a bit too fussy
perhaps, but savoring of personality.
Bibliophilus could wish nothing away
save Mr. Brock's illustrations. The pic-
tures are always quaintly and delicately
drawn, with perhaps as intimate an im-
aginative visualization of the subtile text
as is possible for an illustrator to attain.
Yet, for all that, they vulgarize the iin-
Books New and Old.
perishable and ideal charm of Elian folk,
as the sweetest melody jars upon the
spirit ditties of no tone which melt in the
music of a true lyric.1
in.
The reader in this year of grace 1904,
who shares Lamb's love for old books
and the full-flavored passages of old
writing in them, will find much to engage
him in the new editions of the past year.
Whether he is moved by the affection-
ate curiosity of the amateur of letters,
or by that deeper passion which still
drives many a man to seek upon his
shelves solace for the barrenness or the
stifled sorrow of his days, where shall he
drink more deeply of life, or bring away
a better cheer than from old romance
of adventure, from the older English
Dramatists, from Fielding and Smollett,
from Don Quixote, or from the novels
of Thomas Love Peacock ? 2
A book that would surely have glad-
dened the heart of Elia, to which nothing
quaintly human was ever alien, is The
History of Oliver and Arthur, the oldest
wine in the newest bottle that we have
to taste. After nearly four centuries of
Stygian obscurity the tale comes again
bravely from the press in a form full of
temperament ; for the double-columned
page of Caxton type, with its rubrica-
tions and facsimiles of queer, simple-
minded woodcuts, is as close an approxi-
1 Excursive readers, who wish to consider
further this attractive question of the relation
of the lyric to its musical setting, will do well
to consult a recently published volume wherein
the whole subject is set forth with learning and
taste, and with an unusually intimate sense of
the moods of music and poetry. It is an aca-
demic dissertation, yet singularly like an Ac-
tual Book : —
The Elizabethan Lyric. By JOHN ERSKINE.
New York : The Columbia University Press.
(The MacmiUan Co.) 1903.
2 The History of Oliver and Arthur. Written
in French in 1511, translated into German by
WILHELM LIELY in 1521, and now done into
English by WILLIAM LEIGHTON and ELIZA
BARRETT. Boston and New York : Houghton,
Mifflin & Co. 1903.
mation to old printing as has recently
been seen. The flavor of the wine does
not belie the look of the bottle. Wilhelm
Liely of Bern, who in 1521 turned this
old tale out of French into German, was
no Malory. He was rather, if one may
guess, the Trollope, the E. P. Roe, the
Mrs. Alexander of his age, and he tells
the story of the generous friendship and
miraculous adventures of Oliver and Ar-
thur in the sentimental, prosy, and prag-
matical vein of one who writes for the
common reader. This quality, which
doubtless accounted for the popularity
which the tale seems to have enjoyed in
its century, has been caught with con-
siderable felicity by the present transla-
tors, who — by virtue of eschewing the
aureate diction affected by most trans-
lators of Mediaeval or Renaissance prose
— have contrived to convey from their
German original much of its homely and
flat-footed gait, together with many of
its turns of unconscious humor. In vir-
tue of this quality and of the significance
of the book in showing the attitude of a
Plain Man of the Renaissance approach-
ing and retelling a marvelous Mediaeval
story, this book, which has been strange-
ly overlooked by literary historians, will
deeply engage the interest not only of
Bibliophilus, but of Scholasticus as well.
The excellent Mermaid Series — what
memories in the name for the lover of
old plays ! — is extremely prepossessing
The Mermaid Series. (New thin paper edi-
tion.) New York : Imported by Charles Scrib-
ner's Sons. 1903. Marlowe, Steele, Congreve,
Shirley, Otway, each 1 vol. Jonson, 3 vols.
The Works of Henry Fielding. With Intro-
ductions by G. H. MAYNADIER. 12 vols. New
York : T. Y. Crowell & Co. 1903.
The Works of Tobias Smollett. With Intro-
duction by G. H. MAYNADIER. 12 vols. New
York : T. Y. Crowell & Co. 1903.
Don Quixote ; by Miguel de Cervantes Saave-
dra. Edited by JAMES FiTzMAURicE KELLY.
Translated by JOHN ORMSBY. 4 vols. New
York : T. Y. Crowell & Co. 1903.
The Novels of Thomas Love Peacock. New
York : Imported by Charles Scribner's Sons.
1903.
Books New and Old.
:>G9
in its new embodiment. For getting at
the full, salty savor of an old dramaturge,
" So nimble and so full of subtle flame,"
naught can compare with a dog's-eared
small quarto. Yet the man who per-
sists in squeezing small quartos into the
side pocket of his coat, with a dolorous
distention of the same, will be too fre-
quently called upon to enact an inglori-
ous part in curtain-comedy, to contem-
plate his return from the pleasantest
ramble without anxiety. Such, an one,
can he be but once brought to it, will be
most thankful for the present reprint, —
so slim and insinuating. He will be
glad to know, too, that new volumes
are to be added, offering for his perusal
some of the best of the eloquent high-
flown plays of Shadwell and Dryden.
It is just possible that our worthy
Bibliophilus may be disposed to wrinkle
his delicate nose, as he thrusts it into the
successive volumes of the new editions
of Fielding and Smollett which Mr. May-
nadier has edited. The rubrication of
the title-pages may seem to him too
gratuitous, the pictures, for all their firm
and studious drawing, a bit too conven-
tionally Howard Pylean, and the look
of the page too suggestive of the Six
most Popular Books of the Week, to be
quite the proper dress for such roister-
ing, full-bodied tales as those of Jones
and Rory Random. Yet here again a
Plain Man may venture with an apage
to send Bibliophilus piking home to the
dust and dilapidation of his old editions,
while he himself sits him down to enjoy
the clear large type and comfortable
lightness of the new. The Plain Man
may perhaps find Mr. Maynadier's Intro-
ductions to the various novels somewhat
over ample, but they are full of sound
and readable criticism, which will help
him, not only by the longer balking of
his curiosity, to bring a keener gust to
the enjoyment of the Actual Books.
Should the Plain Man rise from his
reading of Fielding and Smollett with a
desire to refresh his memory of the in-
comparable Book which was their chief
exemplar and inspiration, he may now
procure an edition of Don Quixote which
will suit his purpose admirably, and by
which even the querulousness of Bibli-
ophilus will be subdued. The idea of
an English Don Quixote in thin and
pocketable volumes is not a new one,
but it was a wise choice that selected in
the present instance John Ormsby's trans-
lation for such embodiment. With the
exception of Shelton's quaint and breezy
version, no English translation of Cer-
vantes's book is in itself such delightful
reading, while, by virtue of the trans-
lator's superior Spanish scholarship, it
is the most faithful of all. Ormsby, we
recall, was a private scholar, so virile and
reticent that the name Warrington was
constantly on the lips of his friends.
His favorite reading was always in the
great English novelists of the eighteenth
century, and this, one thinks, was the
prime source of the curious felicity of
his dealings with Don Quixote. In his
version there is just the mingling of gus-
to and formality, plain speech and ornate,
that the book needs, and that is best at-
tained by imbuing one's self with the
modes of expression of Smollett and
Fielding. His style has always an old-
time, but not an archaic, flavor ; and
no one else has dealt so well with the
proverbial wisdom of Sancho Panza.
The English Cervantist will be unaffect-
edly pleased with this handy little set,
and its component volumes will often
be found in his pocket.
The seven Novels of Thomas Love
Peacock complete in one volume seven
inches by four, with its pages, numerous
as the years of Methuselah, bulking to
but three quarters of an inch in thick-
ness, is as big a book of its size as
any one could wish to see. It is hard
to measure the joy in it of the true-born
Peacockian. A more genial traveling
companion for sea or shore than this
learned whimsicalist it would be impos-
270
Books New and Old.
sible to conceive. Nor will Bibliophilus
find the book lacking in temperament,
for the soft, intricately stamped leather
cover and quaintly conceived title-page
agree most harmoniously with the ex-
quisite humor, poetic fancy, and all the
other kindred qualities of that light fan-
tastic pen which they embellish.
The reader who has drunk his fill of
Peacock's inimitable distillation may
wish to round out the night by applica-
tion to the good English ale of other
Early Victorian and Late Georgian hu-
morists. Nothing can be more apt for
the purpose of such an one than a series
of reprints whose sleek red bodies and
white labeled backs chime most conso-
nantly with their rubicund contents.1 The
Memoirs of John Mytton, the Napoleon
of English eccentrics, are as valuable to
students of the Byronic mood as they are
diverting to lovers of curious reading.
For collateral reading with this veracious
memoir nothing could be more fit than
the high-spirited sporting fiction wherein
R. S. Surtees set forth, in the ample
diction of his sub-title, u The Hunting,
Shooting, Racing, Driving, Sailing, Eat-
ing, Eccentric and Extravagant Exploits
of that Renowned Sporting Citizen, Mr.
John Jorrocks of St. Botolph Lane and
Great Coram Street." The amazing ac-
tivity of those beefy times is still further
and more strikingly shown in the Tour
of Doctor Syntax, and the other poems
of William Combe, where his poetic fac-
ulty is seen to be no mere trickling rill in
a Castalian meadow, but a spring freshet
and inundation. Yet in all the prodi-
gious submerged area of his doggerel ver-
sifying there is hardly a dull or a nerve-
1 Memoirs of the Life of John Mytton. By
NIMBOD. With colored plates by H. ALKEN and
T. J. RAWLINS. The Life of a Sportsman. By
NIMROD. With colored plates by H. ALKEN.
The Tour of Doctor Syntax, The Second Tour of
J)octor Syntax, The History of Johnny Quae
Genus, The Dance of Life, each 1 vol. The
English Dance of Death, 2 vols. All with col-
ored illustrations by THOMAS ROWLANDSON.
Handly Cross. By R. S. SUKTEES. With col-
less line ; and nowhere in the rapid poetic
narrative is there a serious discrepancy
from Rowlandson's vigorous Hogarth-
ian plates, which it was written to ac-
company.
If, during this ambrosial night and
long potation of the pride of life, any
reader feel sharp compunction stir within
him, he may find penitential reading in
the Bay Psalm Book.2 It was a sublime
adventure that called " the thirty pious
and learned ministers " then in New Engt
land to set all the Psalms of David over
into English metre ; and it is a worthy
ambition that leads the present publish-
ers to call in the aid of Old Sol — sub-
tlest of printers — in reproducing the
first volume printed in America. The
metrical versions, not smoothed " with
the f weetnes of any paraphrafe," breathe
more piety than poetry ; but they are full
of the very quintessential spirit of quaint-
ness, and the page lacks only the savor
of must in the nostrils of being an ideal
setting. Yet the last impression we bring
away from the book is not that of re-
moteness and queerness, rather it is a
feeling of the actuality and sempiterni-
ty of what the men of those times were
pleased to call the motions of the Soul.
Thus we are pleased to learn by the first
words of the preface of the pious and
learned ministers, that even in those
days church music was not always a
cause of congregational concord. For
they tell us : " The finging of Pfalmes,
though it breath forth nothing but holy
harmony and melody : yet f uch is the
fubtilty of the enemie and the enmity of
our nature againft the Lord, & his wayes,
that our hearts can finde matter of dif-
ored plates and woodcuts by JOHN LEECH.
Jorrocks' Jaunts and Jollities. By R. S. SDB-
TEES. With colored illustrations by H. ALKEN.
New York : D. Appleton & Co. 1903.
2 The Bay Psalm Book. Being a facsimile
Reprint of the First Edition Printed by STE-
PHEN DATE At Cambridge in New England
in 1640. With an Introduction by WILBER-
FORCE EAMES. New York : Dodd, Mead & Co.
1903.
Books New and Old.
271
cord in this harmony, and crotchets of
divifion in this holy melody."
IV.
To pass from the pleasant, busy land-
scape, through which the reader of the
books we have been considering progresses
so wholesomely, to the devious coverts
of spiritual dismay which await him in
the poems of Dante Gabriel Rossetti is
a parlous affair. Yet the present pub-
lication of a notable edition of Rossetti's
poems,1 illustrated from his own designs,
forces an issue which even a peace-lov-
ing man like Bibliophilus cannot dare to
shirk. Let us follow him as, pulling the
bolt upon his books, he grasps a stout
staff, — which may be useful, — and fares
to his adventure.
In nearly all of its mechanical and
editorial details this edition is admirable.
The page is tall and noble-seeming, the
paintings excellently reproduced, and the
binding in commendable taste. Miss
Gary has done her work well. One
wishes that more of Rossetti's paintings
might have been offered, and that some
of those given us might have been dis-
posed in a little easier contiguity to the
poems they carnify. The propriety of
printing introductory notes continuously
with the poetical text and in the same
type is questionable ; but the notes them-
selves are more than commonly intel-
ligent and sensible. All in all, by virtue
of the presentation of both poems and
pictures, the chronological arrangement
of them together with many earlier ver-
sions, and the judicious statement of sig-
nificant biographical details, this is the
best edition that we know of, to be studied
by a person wishing to get at the actual
Rossetti. It is, precisely, this Actual
Rossetti that will engage Bibliophilus and
his stout staff.
For our final impression of the book is
that it contains the mongrel art of a man
whom a mixed ancestry had deprived of
1 The Poems of Dante Gabriel Rossetti, with
illustrations from his own designs. Edited by
the deep-rooted imaginative energy of
racial integrity, at the same time that
it endowed him with the wistful, brief
fecundity which so often appears in the
hybrid. In Rossetti's work, poetry and
painting were strangely interfused, and
in this arrangement of it the pictorial
quality of his writing is strikingly mani-
fest, and the relation of the quality of his
art to the quality of his mind becomes
clear. Despite Miss Gary's and other
evidence of his bursts of epistolary ani-
mation, we do not get over the notion
that he was a moody, preoccupied man.
Through this very preoccupation his pas-
sionate dream of the world became deeply
colored and rich in beautiful detail. The
depth of coloring and beauty of detail
appear equally in his pictures and in his
poems. But in his pictures these quali-
ties are adapted to the development of a
composed theme, while in his poems —
save in sonnets where structure is given
in the form, and in a few tales like the
King's Tragedy where it is given in the
subject — we have only a series of pic-
turesque moments of arrested expression,
slackly joined by an under-running mood.
The crystallizing heat of the true poetic
fire is not there. We hear his sad music
with its ravishing division ; we are sub-
jected to the witchery of a spell as sedu-
cing as Lady Lilith's ; yet, with all its
glamour, no poetry of this sort, so devoid
of initial poetic energy, has ever proved
more than a beautiful, short-lived hybrid.
The reader of this new edition will not
see in its queer interfusion of poetry and
painting any conscious and premeditat-
ed Anderstreben, or Wagnerian striving
after the effect of mingled arts ; rather
he will see a mind in which the visualiz-
ing faculty of the painter and the senti-
mentalizing faculty of the poet are inex-
tricably tangled in a mystical and un-
healthy temperament ; in which neither
is of sufficient independent vigor to be
applied quite independently. As the
ELISABETH LUTHER GARY. 2 vols. New York :
G. P. Putnam's Sons. 1903.
272
Books New and Old.
result of this he will find a dispropor-
tionate amount of imagery in the poems,
and an equally disproportionate amount
of sentiment in the pictures. Where the
poem and the picture are closely linked
together the effect is startling and phan-
tasmagoric ; and this will be the interest-
ing and characteristic, if not the attrac-
tive thing about Rossetti to the men of
the more classically minded age which is
likely to succeed our own. To romantic
sensibilities easily touched by the wist-
fulness of beauty, or to shadowy souls
who go mournfully adown the world,
" Bipae ulterioris amore,"
the appeal of the Blessed Damozel is the
same whether she be painted in words
or in pigments. The malign light, as
of another world than ours of the sun, in
which Beata Beatrix sits ugly, unwhole-
some, and forlorn is the same that baffles
and distorts our vision in the House of
Life, — the same that Dr. Johnson in his
Elysian conversation with Mr. William
Watson reprobated so severely.
v.
" The faces of the Madonnas are be-
yond the discomposure of passion, and
their very draperies betoken an Elysian
atmosphere where wind never blew."
So wrote Edward FitzGerald in one of
his casual, imperishable letters ; and how
good it is to come up out of the dim and
troubled places, whither our pursuit of
Bibliophilus has led us, into the upper
air, the calm and quietude of high art,
there to hear one discoursing of great
things simply, in a style as pure and liv-
ing as ever mirrored the mind of a man
of genius : —
" E quindi uscimmo a riveder le stelle."
To the zeal of FitzGerald's authorized
publishers, and to the pious care of his
friend Mr. Aldis Wright, we owe a lux-
urious definitive edition of his complete
works in seven octavo volumes.1 It would
1 Letters and Literary Remains of Edward
FitzGerald. 7 vols. London and New York :
Macmillan. 1902-3.
have startled the recluse of Woodbridge
could he in his retired and unlaborious
days have foreseen such a monument
erected from the materials of his daily
literary diversions. One who, already
knowing his FitzGerald well, is lured by
the dignified page and artfully contrived
temperament of the set into a thorough
re-reading, so to taste again and re-mea-
sure his joy in the Actual Books, will be
not so much startled as more deeply de-
lighted and impressed.
Beginning with the four volumes dl
the letters, it is pleasant to notice that
the letters to Fanny Kemble have been
disposed in their proper chronological
places, thus giving to the collection some-
thing of the completeness and continuity
of autobiography, and compensating in
a measure for Mr. Wright's extreme re-
ticence in the matter of biographical an-
notation. Of the irresistible personal
charm of the letters it is as needless to
speak here, as it is impertinent to dis-
course at large of the reality of learning,
the precision and intensity of taste, the
lively humanity, which everywhere in-
form them. It is enough to say that
they are of the priceless Actual Books
of the world.
When one comes to the volumes of
the translations of -*Eschylus and Sopho-
cles and Calderon he is newly filled with
admiration for the mingled unction and
grandeur of an English dramatic style,
which in its harmonious union of racy,
homespun speech with poetic phrases
that go like arrows to the gold is nearer
to the inapproachable Shakespearean
style than that of any other dramatic
writer in English for a hundred 'years.
Nor will he complete the reading with-
out an admiration still more profound
for the intellectual force that would con-
vey into English both the pathos and the
ethos of alien drama, so fully and firmly,
and with so little loss. It is not easy to
exaggerate the importance of such work.
For all the long list of admirable trans-
lations that have appeared in our tongue
Books New and Old.
273
since King Alfred set so high a standard
in the translator's art, we are still far
behind the Germans in the wealth of
translated literature which we possess.
It is probably not too much to affirm
that there is no considerable piece of the
world's literature which cannot be found
done into German not only adequately,
but brilliantly, — naturalized, as it were.
The part played by such an inheritance
in enriching national culture is incalcu-
lable.
It is a fair question whether, from the
suffrage of the centuries, these free dra-
matic translations may not appear to be
a service to English literature greater
than the perfectly phrased and musical
rendering of the blasphemous Persian
Horace, greater than the faultless Eu-
phranor, with its exquisitely drawn pic-
ture of young English manhood, greater,
even, than the incomparable letters. At
any rate, these two volumes, with their
dozen of plays, serve to put FitzGerald
quite out of that polite company of liter-
ary idlers to which he is so often rele-
gated. Despite his modest disclaiming,
they give evidence of a scholarship be-
side which slovenly and ill-assimilated
learning is seen for what it is, and of a
vital imaginative realization which could
only have been attained by the strictest
and most searching thought in a mind
of unusual native power. Furthermore,
it is a good subject for psychological
inquiry by some earnest young man,
whether thei'e is not actually as much
volitional energy — as much overcom-
ing of organic inhibitions — involved in
translating a difficult play from Greek
or Spanish as in taking a city.
The character of Old Fitz emerges
from this monumental collection of his
classic " scribblings " less eccentric, more
human, more melancholy than he has
sometimes seemed to essayists and bio-
graphers who have not been forgetful of
the popular appeal of lettered eccentri-
city. We know him for a sturdy senti-
mentalist, who could ignore Rossetti and
rail at Mrs. Browning, yet weep over
Sophocles, Virgil, and Crabbe. If he
was " eccentric " it was largely because
he preferred a breezy human talk with
the captain of his schooner to being
bored in a parlor ; the first-rate in litera-
ture to the third-rate ; God's country to
man's town.
As we by aid of the letters share his
mood from his ardent, friendly youth
down to his serene and solitary old age,
we notice how tenaciously he held to the
old friends and the old books ; how, as
death and inevitable estrangement did
their mortal work, he more and more
found in these old books support against
the failing and angustation of his life.
" I read of mornings," he says, " the
same old books over again, for I have
no command of new ones : Walk with
my great black dog of an afternoon, and
at evening sit with open windows up to
which China roses climb, with my pipe,
while the black-birds and thrushes begin
to rustle bedwards in the garden, and
the nightingale to have the neighbor-
hood to herself." He was the sincerest,
sanest, most constant Book-lover since
Lamb.
It is a moved and mellowed Biblioph-
ilus that rises from this survey and pere-
grination defauteuil, and proceeds with
slippered shuffling to his bed. The Ac-
tual Books that have taken place within
him have left him the breath of a richer
being, and stirred him with the undula-
tions of a deeper self. So let us leave
him, stepping bedwards with no evil in
his heart ; none toward those wan, sad
women of the painter-poet ; toward Mer-
cator and his Units, none.
Ferris Greenslet.
VOL. xcin. — NO. 556.
18
274
Books New and Old.
THE editor of the Contemporary Men
The Oontem- °f Letters Series l announces
SlTene^e- that its PurPose is to P™'
ries. vide brief but comprehensive
sketches, biographical and critical, of liv-
ing writers and of those who, though dead,
may still properly be regarded as belong-
ing to our time. European as well as
English and American men of letters are
to be included, so as to give a survey of
the intellectual and artistic life of a cos-
mopolitan age. It is too soon to hazard
a guess whether this new venture will seri-
ously dispute the territory now occupied
by the well-known English and American
Men of Letters Series. Externally, as
compared with them, the new volumes
are evidently to be much more brief, con-
taining scarcely more than twenty to
twenty-five thousand words. Their typo-
graphy is unusually attractive.
The critical work of the authors of the
first two volumes issued is already fami-
liar to readers of the Atlantic. Mr.
Boynton's easy command of the resources
of sound objective criticism is seen to
good advantage in his study of Bret
Harte. Independence of attitude, clarity
and precision of treatment characterize
it throughout. The skillful, if somewhat
over-generous use of illustrative quota-
tions supports his position, and as an
assessment of the value of Bret Harte's
stories, Mr. Boynton's book leaves little
for the Judgment Day to complete. For
it is doubtless true, as Mr. Boynton re-
marks, that Bret Harte's talent was not
quite of the first kind, and that " he had
one brilliant vision and spent the rest of
his life in reminding himself of it." One
cannot quarrel with the essential justice
of this estimate. But in sketching Bret
Harte's personality, Mr. Boynton's right-
eous and almost petulant resentment of
the elder author's idleness, extravagance,
and irregularity seems to blind him, mo-
1 Contemporary Men of Letters Series. Edited
by WILLIAM ASPENWALL BRADLEY.
Bret Harte. By HENRY W. BOYNTON. New
York: McClure, Phillips & Co. 1903.
mentarily, to other traits that also belong
in the picture. Less truth would have
been somehow more true. Hazlitt had
a friend who bound Burke's Reflections
on the French Revolution and Paine's
Rights of Man into one volume, claiming
that together they made a very good
book. If by some lucky accident Mr.
Howells's delightful reminiscences of
Bret Harte in the December Harper's
could be bound up with Mr. Boynton's
study, we should have an excellent com-
posite portrait of the author of Dickens in
Camp and the Outcasts of Poker Flat.
Compared with Mr. Boynton's cool
expertness in walking around his object
and making swift sketches of it, Mr.
Greenslet's book on Walter Pater re-
presents criticism of the " laborious ori-
ent ivory " order of workmanship. It is
wrought with true inwardness, consum-
mate refinement, a happy ingenuity, and
the merest touch, here and there, of pre-
ciosity. Like Pater's own writing, it is
intended for the judicious and attentive
reader, for " modern young men of an
uncommercial turn." The little book
invites and rewards the very closest
scrutiny. If in certain passages there
are traces of a preference for the " hu-
manistic " rather than the human, and
for the superfine rather than the fine,
these are faults which in our day of dic-
tated composition and of blurred sense
for literary values may almost pass for
virtues. The third and fifth chapters,
devoted to Criticism of Art and Let-
ters and The New Cyrenaicism, contain
especially valuable contributions to the
intelligent study of Pater. Mr. Greens-
let does not lack audacity, as witne-ss his
clever defense of his paradox that Pater
is essentially a humorous writer. Of his
many felicitous passages this description
of the " African " quality of Pater's prose
must serve as a single example : —
Walter Pater. By FERRIS GREENSLET. New
York: McClure, Phillips & Co. 1903.
Books New and Old.
275
" Pater's prose is obviously not Attic
prose. Matthew Arnold and Cardinal
Newman, among the Victorians, came
nearer to that, and how different they are
from Pater ! Nor is it Asiatic ; it has lit-
tle of De Quincey's florid luxuriance, his
Ciceronian rhythms, and Persian pomp.
To keep to the figure for suggestion
rather than definition, Pater's style is
African in its flavour. It is a character-
istic product of an Alexandrine society,
too urbane ever to be grandiloquent, yet
too curious in its scholarship, too profuse
of its sympathies to be quite content with
simple, Addisonian clarity."
In pages like these Mr. Greenslet
not only betrays the secret of Pater's
charm for the Paterian, but brings his
author into such clearly apprehended re-
lations to the great world of letters that
the very infirmities of Pater's style and
the defects in his scheme of things are
discreetly manifested. It may be pos-
sible, after a score or two of years, to
write more positively than Mr. Greens-
let has done concerning Pater's influence
upon his generation, but Pater will be for-
tunate if he finds another critic of such
catholic scholarship and such affectionate
intimacy of interpretation. B. P.
THERE could hardly be a more curi-
A Novel Ex- ous expression of the modern
periment in . . r ••..•. • «• j
Poetry. scientific spirit than is afford-
ed by the preface of Mr. Shaler's recent
work.1
In youth he has, he admits, loved
poetry and written verses. Thereafter
he has been more and more completely
diverted from such addictions by enthu-
siasm for scientific studies. Shakespeare
has long since become tedious to him,
and he " has not willingly visited a thea-
tre for forty years." Nevertheless, he
believes that his imagination has con-
tinued to ripen by exercise upon scien-
tific themes. He believes that a scien-
1 Elizabeth of England. A Dramatic Ro-
mance. In Five Parts. By N. S. SHALEK,
Professor of Geology in Harvard University.
list's progressive indifference to literature
(he naturally cites the case of Darwin)
is due not to loss of faculty, but simply
to preoccupation. This belief, which the
lay intelligence might be willing to let
stand as a conviction, Mr. Shaler has
wished to put to the proof, for his own
satisfaction. Coming to the conclusion
(with the advice, as he says, of " those
well-informed in the matter ") that the
Elizabethan dramatic form would be
best for his purpose, he has produced the
present " romance." After some experi-
menting with prose " the writing began to
take shape as heroic verse, which at once
proved to be an easier and more sustain-
ing mode of expression than prose." At
this point we come to one of the most in-
teresting details of the transaction. The
romance was written at odd intervals, but
" it soon became evident that the compo-
sition was, in a way, continued from day
to day in the region below the plane of
consciousness, appearing only when at-
tention was directed to it."
This is a sound doctrine of literary
composition, and has, no doubt, a true
analogy in the processes by which im-
portant advances in science are made.
But it is not quite clear that Mr. Shaler's
long exercise of the scientific imagination
has directly affected his present exercise
of the poetic imagination. Despite the
reliable assurance that the author has
made little conscious preparation for the
work, by way either of special research
or of practice in writing blank verse, one
cannot take the product as that of a
literary novice. Mr. Shaler's instinct
for poetic expression was early aroused,
and has been developed by a perfectly
normal, though sub-conscious or " sub-
liminal " process. His knowledge of life,
his general efficiency, have been increased
by experience, and his sense of literary
form has been singularly tenacious. From
these unusual conditions we cannot be
Boston and New York : Houghton, Mifflin &
Co. 1903.
276
Some Books about Cities.
surprised that an unusual product has
emerged. That absorbed application to
scientific study need not prevent the par-
tial development of a preexistent literary
faculty is abundantly proved by this ex-
periment.
We say " partial development," be-
cause it is evident that Mr. Shaler's nat-
ural faculty for poetic expression might
have been further developed by conscious
and continued effort. In structure it
is evident that this study does not pro-
ceed from the hand of a writer practiced
in dramatic composition. The parts of
the romance, though they are given the
five-act form, cannot be called in any
strict sense plays. They lack the com-
pactness of dialogue, the rapidity of ac-
tion, and, what is more important, the
organic structure, of real drama. Mr.
Shaler has, he tells us, omitted something
like one third of his material as it stood
in the original manuscript. What re-
mains might still, under the influence of
a controlled as well as spontaneous crea-
tive faculty, be advantageously subjected
to further compression. Much of his po-
etic matter is yet in solution, and would
be greatly more effective if, by that right
touch which only experience can confer,
it had been fairly precipitated. But the
experimenter does not profess to be an
accomplished poet, and is right in sup-
posing that his work possesses, though
not a supreme, a genuine poetic quality.
The fourth part, The Death of Essex,
most nearly approximates the form and
the substance of a veritable drama. It
has greater unity of action, and a more
effective climax. Its verse is more preg-
nant and stately : one might have said
more studied, if the author had not as-
sured us to the contrary. One finds
it, indeed, not a little difficult to read a
speech like this of Elizabeth's as the im-
provisation of a person unskilled in the
poetic craft, unaware of any resemblance
between his manner and that of the great
period of English poetic drama : —
" But he 's a man
With noble gentleness to move all hearts.
He strides not with his fellows, for his feet
Are winged with eager thoughts. The ancient
hills,
The common mount with panting, are to him
But stepping stones which space unnoticed voids
That part him from his goals. So on he goes,
An Atlas seeking for some world that waits
His might to stay its fall, or else to hurl
Some blessed orb to ruin. For such will
There is no place within this balanced realm
Where might needs ward of reason."
Of the lyrics with which the dialogue is
interspersed it can only be said that they
betray more readily than the blank verse
that method of improvisation which the
author has not hesitated to avow, even
to insist upon. As a most interesting
exercise in a somewhat irregular form
of dramatic composition, this work can
hardly fail to be read with attention ;
and more than this its author does not
ask of us. H. W. B.
SOME BOOKS ABOUT CITIES.
IT is no longer a national virtue to
mind one's own business. The globe-
trotter, it seems, has not trotted for no-
thing, nor the white man carried his bur-
den in vain. We feel a neighborly con-
cern not only in the earthquakes and
famines, the wars and rumors of wars of
Dan and Beersheba, but in their little
domestic privacies. Yet with this in-
quisitiveness as to the holes and corners
of creation, our main interest is reserved
for the typical cities. Expansion is a
beautiful word, but the force which we
actually count upon to advance the spe-
Some Books about Cities.
277
cies is centripetal. A great city, more-
over, cannot long be a congregation with-
out becoming a personality. That con-
noisseur in subtle emotions, Mr. Arthur
Symons, is among other things a collector
of cities, and has just brought together a
series of papers l dealing with the more
important treasures of his collection.
His standard of choice has been personal
and exacting. " I have come upon many
cities," he says, " which have left me
indifferent, perhaps through some acci-
dent in my way of approach ; at any rate,
they had nothing to say to me : Madrid,
for instance, and Vienna, and St. Peters-
burg, and Berlin. It would be impossible
for me to write about these cities : I should
have nothing to say. But certain other
cities, Rome, Venice, Seville, how I have
loved them, what a delight it was to me to
be alive, and living in them ! . . . Moscow,
Naples, how I have hated them, how I
have suffered in them, merely because I
was there ; and how clearly I see them
still, with that sharp memory of discom-
fort ! " The writer of these sentences
is not quite an English D' Annunzio, but
one cannot deny that he possesses that
abnormal form of susceptibility which is
always on the fearful edge of satiety.
To such a nature even a city may be
an object of voluptuous pursuit, and the
record of its adventures will not be free
from an element of almost pathological
interest.
Mr. Symons has not been unconscious
of the perilousness'of his chosen method.
He has " tried to do more than write a
kind of subjective diary, in which the
city should be an excuse for his own sen-
sations." In this attempt he has suc-
ceeded quite as well as we should care
to have him, for he is, at best and at
worst, an individuality. Moreover, he is
not at all a person of die-away intelli-
gence. The present book has plenty of
vigorous passages, the product of that
sound critical sense which Mr. Symons
1 Cities. By ARTHUR SYMONS. New York :
James Pott & Co. 1903.
has so often shown in another kind of
work. And in seizing upon the salient
element of appeal in his chosen cities,
he by no means confines himself to a re-
cord of vague emotions. "Everything in
Rome," he says, for example, " impresses
by its height, by an amplitude of adjusted
proportions, which is far more than the
mere equivalent of vast space covered,
as in London, invisible for its very size.
The pride of looking down, the pride of
having something to look up to, are alike
satisfied for the Romans, by what nature
and art have done for Rome." The chap-
ters on Rome, Venice, and Seville, records
of fond enthusiasms, are, in the nature of
things, pleasanter to read than the rest ;
they are, perhaps, more profitable, as love
is more profitable than hatred. A sen-
tence or two from the paper on Moscow
will serve to suggest the pictorial quality
of the author's descriptions, and the acute
discomfort to which his sensitiveness
makes him liable : " Colours shriek and
flame ; the Muscovite eye sees only by
emphasis and by contrast ; red is com-
pleted either by another red or by bright
blue. There are no shades, no reticences,
no modulations. The restaurants are
filled with the din of vast mechanical or-
gans, with drums and cymbals ; a great
bell clashes against a chain on all the
trams, to clear the road ; the music which
one heai'S is a ferocity of brass. The
masons who build the houses build in
top-boots, red shirts, and pink trousers ;
the houses are painted red or green or
blue ; the churches are like the temples
of savage idols, tortured into every un-
natural shape and coloured every glaring
colour."
The other books about cities which
have recently come to hand happen to
deal with material altogether different
from that with which Mr. Symons con-
cerns himself. Their method is less per-
sonal, therefore less literary ; it ranges
all the way from the journalistic to the
sociological, and from the sociological to
278
Some Books about Cities.
the historical. Mr. London's latest book 1
has to do professedly with one of the ug-
liest results of the centripetal tendency.
His picture of London slum life is ap-
palling enough, painted with plenty of
vigor and not a little coarseness ; but it is
not strikingly fresh. There is something
needlessly exacerbated in the perennial
astonishment with which students of so-
ciology rediscover the horrors of urban
vice and poverty. The evils are there,
and we ought never to cease hearing of
them ; but not seldom the social Jere-
miah seems to have insufficiently assimi-
lated the facts with which his somewhat
hasty observation has acquainted him.
The indignation with which he speaks is
more savage than righteous ; the book is
unfortunately deficient in the firmness
and dignity of mood and touch which
might have made it literature. One is
likely to lay it down with the feeling that
one has been reading a long and reason-
ably sensational newspaper story.
Thirty Years of Musical Life in Lon-
don 2 ignores the " submerged " society
of the East End no more thoroughly than
the commercial and drawing-room circles
of the West End. Its busy professional
air is not tempered by amenities, literary
or other. It has to give, in a simple and
personally modest way, certain reminis-
cences of the London experience of many
of the greatest musicians of the nine-
teenth century. The book contains much
good anecdote and not a little interesting
criticism. A fact which it makes sur-
prisingly clear is that Englishmen have
persisted in resenting the preference for
foreign musicians which the English public
has unmistakably felt. One imagines that
in America the preeminence of European
musicians, whether composers or players,
is pretty generally recognized. The pre-
sent reviewer recalls hearing, some years
ago, an American violinist of merit re-
1 The People of the Abyss. By JACK LON-
DON. New York : The Macmillan Co. 1903.
2 Thirty Years of Musical Life in London. By
H. KLEIN. New York : The Century Co. 1903,
mark, somewhat wearily but not resent-
fully, that there was only one American
in the Boston Symphony Orchestra. We
do not understand that the organization
of musical labor which has just adver-
tised itself so widely has made a distinc-
tion against the immigrant ; it could ill
afford to do so. Yet in Dr. .Klein's book
we find so prominent a man as Sir Ar-
thur Sullivan gravely protesting against
the appointment of Hans Richter as con-
ductor of the Birmingham Festival : " I
think," he says, in a letter to the author,
" all this musical education for the Eng-
lish is vain and idle, as they are not al-
lowed the opportunity, of earning their
living in their own country. Foreigners
are thrust in everywhere, and the press
supports this injustice." As Richter
was one of the great conductors of the
day, the point of injustice does not seem
quite clear. Sir Arthur Sullivan was, ac-
cording to Dr. Klein, " England's great-
est musician ; " yet how little he stands
for in world-music ! The present volume
owes its interest largely to the foreign
composers, conductors, and players who
have been inevitably in the foreground of
English musical life. Nevertheless, it is
an important phase of life in nineteenth-
century London which the book records.
And the treatment of special phases is,
apart from the personal literary method,
the only fresh method of dealing with
metropolitan life to be hoped for.
People who are fond of " fashnable
fax and polite annygoats " will find it
worth while to glance, at least, into the
latest book which is made up of this sort
of material.8 It is always a relief to come
upon an English book about Paris which
succeeds in keeping clear of the boule-
vards and the Latin Quarter. These
letters were written during the Second
Empire by a French attache". The fact
that they were originally contributed to
3 Gossip from Paris. Selected and Arranged
by A. R. WALLER. New York : D. Appleton
&Co. 1903,
Some Books about Cities.
279
an English newspaper would be more
surprising if one did not see at once that
the political allusions are of the most
general nature. In fact, the writer is all
for high life. He has no end of sprightly
gossip about court functions ; he has an
excellently light touch in the description
of places and persons ; and there is much
amiable chatter about the pedigree, social
achievements, matrimonial concerns, of
the fashionable set in which he moves.
He writes always with grace and anima-
tion, but superficially, as a talented cor-
respondent rather than a person who
wishes to produce literature. The let-
ters are perishable stuff ; they yield at
best a suggestion of faded elegance, an
odor of forgotten trifles ; they are not alive,
they have simply been restored for a mo-
ment to the light. It is fortunate that the
editor has retained only one twelfth of
the material at his disposal ; and it is
doubtful if even that deserves more than
a momentary audience at this time. So
much it does deserve.
Some years ago a book on Egypt was
published which has proved to be suffi-
ciently important to deserve revision.1
The writer's aim is simple. He does not
attempt, he says, " to solve the riddle of
the Sphinx," but merely to furnish " a
discursive budget of information and com-
ment, — social, political, economic, and
administrative." He is successful in do-
ing just this. The book has no literary
graces, but those who wish to know some-
thing about the irrigation, women, ciga-
rettes, bazaars, and rulers of Egypt may
find, as Mr. Penfield says, "something
and not too much " in this well-made,
well-illustrated, and pleasantly written
volume.
The two books 2 among our number
which deal with American cities are his-
1 Present Day Egypt. By FREDERIC C. PEN-
FIELD. New York: The Century Co. 1903.
2 Boston : The Place and the People. By
M. A. DEWOLFE HOWE. New York: The
Macmillan Co. 1903.
torical in substance, but literary in treat-
ment. They do not profess to be based
upon original research, but rather to pre-
sent a readable and reliable interpreta-
tion of material which has been accumu-
lated by other hands. The compara-
tively recent work of such writers as Mr.
Fiske has done much to deepen our sense
of the value of the historical interpreter
as distinguished from the historical in-
vestigator.
For variety, for picturesqueness, for
richness in the elements of romance, the
annals of Old Boston can hardly rival
those of Old Quebec. The present nar-
rative begins and continues in a style of
vigor and " pace." Its character as a
story is never compromised by the in-
troduction of minor, or, rather, insig-
nificant detail. It is no small triumph
for the authors to have succeeded in pro-
ducing an " assimilation of the generous
data " as to the history of Quebec which
have now become common property.
Due credit is of course given to Parkman,
the only American who both as investi-
gator and as interpreter stands in the
first rank among historians.
The style of Mr. Howe's Boston is
less fluent, more anecdotal and descrip-
tive. It possesses some of the qualities
of a handbook ; all of them, if we give
the word its best possible sense. For the
general reader it is the best compact work
on Boston which has yet been produced.
Professedly historical as these books
are, it is plain that neither writer has
failed to develop a sense of intimate ac-
quaintance with one city or the other as
a living personality. " The venerable
fortress on the tidal water," say the au-
thors of Old Quebec, in drawing to a
close, " ever was, and still remains, the
noblest city of the American continent.
There still works the antique spirit which
Old Quebec: The Fortress of New France.
By GILBERT PARKER and CLAUDE G. BRYAN.
New York : The Macmillan Co. 1903.
280
The Contributors' Club.
cherishes culture and piety and domestic
virtue as the crown of a nation's deeds
and worth. . . . Apart from the hot winds
of politics — civic, provincial, and na-
tional — which blow across the temper-
ate plains of their daily existence, the
people of the city and the province live
as simply, and with as little greedy am-
bition, as they did a hundred years ago."
Mr. Howe, accepting the definition of
Boston as " a state of mind," finds that
state made up largely of '* a keen sense
of civic responsibility." He is not trou-
bled by the fact, which he records, that
the Boston government is largely in the
hands of foreign-born persons. " The
attempt to amalgamate the diverse ele-
ments into a common citizenship goes for-
ward through hundreds of agencies, —
the public schools, the social settlements,
the organization of charities, secular and
religious, designed to meet every con-
ceivable need of the unfortunate, but in
such a way as to create citizens as well
as paupers." Perhaps we have not been
sufficiently ready to think of Boston as
an abode of citizens ; we feel more at
home with "the critical attitude" and
" the good principle of rebellion," which
Mr. Howe presently mentions as com-
ponents of the Boston state of mind.
There are other and subtler ingredients,
one feels, — they are all present in the
character and work of the Autocrat.
One may be in a state of mind about
things ; Boston has always been that :
but to be a state of mind is a horse of
another color. H. W. B.
THE CONTRIBUTORS' CLUB.
IN the vocabulary of criticism the word
An Idealistic "realism" has been soiled
Realist. with all ignoble use, and one
would hate to apply it unconditionally to
the work of a writer whom one admired.
George Gissing, whose death is a loss
to English literature none the less actual
because he never won a wide circle of
readers, would no doubt be called a real-
ist by those who fancy that when once
they have attached a label to a man there
is nothing more to be said about him ;
but such a characterization cannot be ac-
cepted if it is meant to put him in the
same category with Emile Zola, Flau-
bert, Mr. George Moore, and Mr. How-
ells, who are all realists in their differ-
ent ways. With them it is the fact, and
the fact only, which seems to count.
But it is the fact transfigured by the
imagination that one seeks in a work of
art ; and the finest realism is not found
in the record, but in the interpretation
of the record. Gissing was a realist con-
trolled by an ideal. He might seem to
insist upon the sordid side of life, but he
had a passionate love of beauty. Con-
sequently, in his analysis of the ugly
there was always an implied contrast
with the beautiful. This idealizing ten-
dency grew upon him as he wrote. The
Crown of Life, one of his last books, is
far richer in spiritual nourishment than
The Unclassed, one of his first.
Yet even in The Unclassed, and in
Demos, and Workers in the Dawn, the
difference between his method and that
of others who have dealt with the under
side of human existence was sufficiently
marked. It was no doubt a fault in his
art that hb emphasized things evil un-
duly ; but he did not fail to see the soul
of goodness in them. He was not mor-
bid and he was not indecent. He did
not spare the dark touches necessary to
complete the picture, but he did not put
them there simply because they were
dark. One feels that Zola gloated over
The Contributors' Club.
281
his repulsive details, that Flaubert de-
picted vice with cold contempt, that Mr.
Moore attempts to discover in a spirit of
bravado how much the public will stand,
that Mr. Howells more genially expounds
the significance of the unessential. But
George Gissing was obviously moved by
the " daily spectacles of mortality " he
contemplated. His was not the detached
attitude of the scientist ; it was the keen
sympathy of the artist. He did not let
his sensibilities run away with him ; he
was never morbid or mawkish ; he dis-
dained the devices of a melodramatic
sentimentalism ; he was incapable of
" working up " pathos. He could put
the situation before us as vividly as any
realist of them all. But the deep and
poignant emotion was there, even if the
superficial reader did not discover it. No
cold observation could have accomplished
this. No novelist by a little intellectual
slumming can really tell us how the other
half lives.
In the second period of his career
that saeva indignatio in him turned more
to grim satire. He dealt, not with those
whom all classes had cast out, but with
a class least likely to have comprehen-
sive sympathies, the class which one
must still call, despite the objections of
many persons to the term, the "lower
middle." Perhaps In the Year of Ju-
bilee is his most remarkable achieve-
ment in this respect. The dull monotony
of the daily round, the sordid aims, the
laxity of moral fibre, the incapacity to
comprehend, much less to experience,
the nobler emotions, — these things are
portrayed with a distinctness which one
may fairly call appalling. Eve's Ran-
som is a study of human selfishness.
The man sacrifices himself for the girl,
and she receives the sacrifice gayly, and
goes her way, leaving him to cherish his
hurt in silence. Yet even here Gissing's
idealism has the last word. The man
realizes that his pain has been worth
living through. " Entbehren sollst du,
sollst enibehren" — that is the law of
life. The lesson is taught with bitterer
emphasis to the hero of New Grub
Street, for whom " la lutte pour la vie "
proves. too much, and whose genius can-
not survive the hardest blows of fate.
In the struggle of Reardon to be true
to his art against the most adverse con-
ditions there is possibly some flavor of
autobiography, — though for that matter
every novel that is worth anything must
have a glimpse of the writer's own soul.
But Gissing was not the man to exploit
his personality ; he was not up to the
tricks of the trade as practiced by the
commercial novelist ; and it does not
require for the appreciation of his art
any impertinent intrusion into his life.
New Grub Street is a book to be read.
Those who choose to do so may take it
as an argument against the marriage of
men of genius to commonplace and self-
ish women. Indeed, the unequal bond
of wedlock was often a theme with
Gissing. But if so many marriages are
unhappy, if a union brought about by
anything less than perfect love and trust
is certain to be unhappy, what place in
the world shall the women who do not
marry take ? Such a question is hardly
answered by The Odd Women, an-
other novel far superior to most con-
temporary fiction. The heroine of that
tale does not have, after all, the courage
of her convictions. But then so few of
us do !
The Odd Women manifested conspicu-
ously Gissing's growing interest in wider
and higher themes ; it also marked a
further growth of his idealistic temper ;
and therefore his later books may appeal
to readers whom his earlier did not in-
terest. The Crown of Life is, on the
whole, the most remarkable of these ; it
reveals the passionate tenderness which
is the root of all the author's convictions.
Love is the crown of life, and the right
woman is worth any man's while to wait
for. And there are large public ques-
tions involved in the story, — imperial-
ism, for example. Our Friend the Char-
282
The Contributors' Club.
latan is a still closer study of political
conditions, though what gives it its value
is the unsparing analysis of the man who
deludes himself no less than he deludes
others. It is upon his skill in the deline-
ation of character that the fame of the
novelist is most likely to rest ; plots are
easily forgotten, but the Becky Sharps
and Colonel Newcomes remain more real
than the figures of authentic history.
One cannot help feeling that Gissing
would have done, had he lived, better
work in the future than in the past. But
he did enough to make his fame secure.
" MY mind to me a kingdom is," wrote
The Unruly Sir Edward Dyer something
Kingdom. \faQ three hundred years ago ;
and in a tiresome strain of self -laudation
he continues, —
" Though much I want that most would have,
Yet still my mind forbids to crave."
To condense the substance of several
stanzas into plain prose, this remarkable
mind, he claims, was indifferent to wealth,
power, love, or hate, had no desires to
satisfy, nothing to fear, no cares to trou-
ble ; and he concludes, —
" Thus do I live, thus will I die ;
Would all do so as well as I ! "
To me it has always seemed that in
the matter of that poem Sir Edward was
either an impostor or the victim of gross
self-delusion. If he had taken the trou-
ble to keep a careful eye upon the go-
ings-on of his mind for even one day, he
doubtless would have discovered that his
kingdom was in no such ideal state of
subjection as he proudly asserted.
In fact, I much misdoubt any human
being's having a perfectly disciplined,
docile mind which never runs away, un-
expectedly shies, or balks at inconvenient
seasons. When I encounter a person
who is always outwardly serene and self-
controlled, I find myself wondering what
sort of scenes he has with himself in pri-
vate. That there are some lively ones
I am confident.
Of course there are minds and minds,
all differing in their amenability to con-
trol and in their various ways of evading
and rebelling against the will and judg-
ment of their owners. I may be biased
in my impression of their general un-
reliability by the peculiarly untractable
character of my own, which I have found
endowed with all. of the undesirable ten-
dencies mentioned by Professor James,
as well as possessed of several original
shortcomings as yet uncatalogued by psy-
chologists.
Often after a day spent in heading off
and checking one train of thought after
another, only to have each in its turn
supplanted by something equally objec-
tionable, I have found myself exhausted
by the conflict with these rebellious men-
tal processes, and in a mood of unquali-
fied disgust and discontent with myself.
At such times I have occasionally taken
an imaginary revenge on the refractory
mind, which has given so much trouble,
by telling it how cheaply I would dis-
pose of it, if minds were only market-
able commodities. On the supposition
that they could be bartered, I have im-
agined myself inserting in the column
for subscribers' wants in some reputable
journal an announcement something like
the following : " For sale or exchange.
A mind in a good state of preservation,
never having been subjected to hard use,
tolerably quick, and fairly good in dis-
position. The owner's reason for part-
ing with it is that it never has been well
broken, is somewhat willful, and too fond
of play. Any one able to train it would
find it desirable for light, varied use.
The present proprietor is in need of a
thoroughly trained, steady-going mind
of a more substantial character."
But, on- the whole, if one could be at
will the possessor of a plodding, draft-
horse sort of mind, would there not be
some disadvantages connected with such
an article ? It seems as if there might
be a dreary monotony about the opera-
tions of, a mind which always worked in
a rut, and whose methods and proceed-
ings could be predicted with tolerable
The Contributors' Club.
283
certainty. The erratic kind is more than
a little trying at times, when it neglects
the tasks assigned it, and disports itself
on forbidden ground ; but it must be
confessed that the unexpectedness of its
performances sometimes makes it more
entertaining than if it were better regu-
lated.
When one is thrown upon one's own re-
sources for diversion, it is not altogether
a bad thing to have a mind liable at
times to do idiotic or preposterous things.
It becomes rather amusing, if not car-
ried too far. I suspect that many peo-
ple have discovered a closer mental kin-
ship between themselves and Mr. Barrie's
Thomas Sandys than they would care to
acknowledge. It was with genuine de-
light that I read of the sprained ankle
which Tommie was obliged to have as
an excuse for being discovered in tears.
I have been caught so many times in a
similar predicament that it is a pleasure
to believe that Mr. Barrie may possibly
himself have experienced the shame and
confusion into which one is plunged un-
der such circumstances.
When a small child I was one day
found crying comfortably by myself.
The family was greatly concerned to
know the cause of a trouble which sought
retirement instead of demanding sym-
pathy and consolation. Upon hearing
that I was just thinking how I should
feel if a bear came up and bit my hand,
there was a chorus of laughter, and I was
left to the enjoyment of my grief. Since
then I have been surprised more than
once in either tears or laughter due to an
imaginary cause, and have been forced
to conjure a more or less plausible ex-
planation ; but never since that first time
have I owned the truth that I was merely
making believe.
When as a child I was taken to church
I used to beguile the time during the
prayer and sermon by counting the panes
of glass in the long windows which ran
nearly to the ceiling. There were three
sashes to a window, and each sash, I think,
had four rows of five panes. I counted
those panes in every possible way, — up
and down, sideways, diagonally, and zig-
zag. If the results did not tally, I knew
there was a mistake somewhere and be-
gan again. At a later period I formed
the habit of amusing myself during the
sermon by repeating poetry. Now, if
my mind shows a disposition to wander
from the clergyman's discourse, I sit with
my eyes fastened respectfully upon him
and perhaps make up a sermon of my
own. Two or three of these have proved
of more interest than the others, so I go
back to them in preference to inventing
new ones. Sunday after Sunday I have
delivered one or the other of those ser-
mons to large and attentive audiences.
On such occasions I speak without notes.
My delivery is exceedingly simple and
quiet, with no effort at display, but the
audience is invariably impressed by the
deep feeling and moral earnestness with
which the address is pervaded.
I am more fond, however, of singing in
opera than of being a popular preacher.
My voice is a soprano of remarkable
purity and richness, equally good in its
high and low tones. My favorite part
is that of Brunhild, which I render with
a dramatic intensity never yet equaled.
The cry of the Valkyrs, as I give it, has
a superhuman quality which sends chills
creeping up and down the spine of the
most stolid listener. Not infrequently I
appear in the ballet of an opera. Quite
often I am an actress. It being hard for
me to decide on my favorite character, I
generally play on benefit nights, when I
give the best scenes from several of my
most famous parts.
However, I am by no means always a
celebrity. Frequently I am content to
be a very commonplace person, my only
remarkable points being an extremely
magnetic personality combined with an
ever ready sympathy and a charm none
the less real because indefinable, which
bring me the love and esteem of all who
know me.
284
The Contributors' Club.
Of course this is supremely idiotic, and
no one would confess to being so foolish
if he were not tolerably sure that most
of his fellow creatures know in their
own hearts they are no more sensible.
They may not acknowledge it. That is
a different matter.
I wonder how many people realize the
comfort there is in having a real brisk
quarrel mentally with your friends when
they prove exasperating. If it could
only be rightly managed, a not too fre-
quent vigorous scene would be a help in
most of the intimate relations of life. It
would serve at least to break out of the
rut of commonplace into which any con-
stant companionship is liable to sink. All
the accumulating annoyances and vexa-
tions from small daily frictions could thus
be swept away in one half hour and the
weather cleared for some time to come.
The difficulty is that it is an exceedingly
delicate piece of business to conduct such
a settlement in the right way. One side
or the other is pretty sure to overdo the
matter. In sultry weather a hard shower
with some sharp thunder and lightning
is refreshing, but you don't want a water
spout or a six weeks' pour.
It is a more prudent procedure, there-
fore, unless reasonably confident of the
discretion of the other party, to conduct
such a readjustment entirely by one's
self. In that way, while endeavoring in
the presence of a friend to preserve an
outward demeanor aptly described by
Scott's Pet Marjorie in the lines quoted
by Mr. Lang with such relish, —
" She was more than usual calm,
She did not give a single dam," —
I have been freely applying to the un-
conscious object of my wrath the entire
alphabet of abusive terms at my com-
mand, ranging from anaconda, beast and
crocodile, to zebra. After further going
on to declare mentally to the person be-
fore me that I despise, detest, loathe, and
hate him or her, as the case may be, the
atmosphere will be decidedly fresher and
a pleasant friendly feeling restored.
What satisfactory substitute can mar-
ried people find for the amusement of
considering the qualifications of mem-
bers of the opposite sex for husbands or
wives? One ought doubtless to have
conscientious scruples against indulging
in this diversion after marriage, and what
a source of entertainment must be lost !
A woman can find endless mental occu-
pation in contemplating the various mer
of her acquaintance, and deciding with
regai-d to each whether he would be com-
panionable, or glum, uncommunicative
and frigid, at home ; whether he would
make himself a dictator in regard to
family affairs, so that his wife would feel
under constant restraint. Could she go
to the city for a day just because she was
in the mood for it, without his wanting
to know the reason, and thinking she
had better take another day and another
train than she had planned ? Worse yet,
would he insist upon going with her and
regulating the whole day's programme
according to his own ideas ?
What turn do a man's speculations
take with respect to the women he knows ?
Probably he wonders whether such a
woman is given to nagging, fretting, or
worrying ; whether she would be serene
and adequate to the situation when the
cook leaves without warning; whether
she would inflict all the particulars of
domestic annoyances upon her husband
every day, and — and — Well, men
know best what they think.
But one of the greatest annoyances
liable to be experienced from minds
arises from having one that is a misfit.
There is a disagreeable incongruity about
an old head on young shoulders. We all
know people who were old in character
and tastes* from the time they were born ;
and very tedious they usually are, too.
But the contrary of this is still worse. It
is positively mortifying to have a mind
which totally ignores birthdays, and finds
its delight in pastimes it should have out-
grown. It is decorous to retain an in-
terest in the enjoyments of youth, but it
The Contributors' Club.
285
is highly undignified to have a fondness
for them yourself after the season for
them is past. My mind has shown most
alarming symptoms in this direction.
Already it is a good ten years behind its
age. What a prospect if it should con-
tinue to lag ! Imagine getting into the
sixties and being disgraced in the eyes
of all who know you by a mind that still
lingered in the thirties ! Does any one
know of a remedy for such a case ?
SUCH a book as Wilfrid Meynell's
Tradition and fthout Disraeli1 makes one
Biography. doubt whether a formal bio-
graphy has, after all, so great an advan-
tage over tradition in fixing the reputa-
tion of a man who has lived long in full
view of the public. It is one contrast
more between the great rivals. Mr.
Morley's copious illustration of Glad-
stone appeared nearly at the same time
that we learned of Lord Rowton's death.
He was Disraeli's literary executor, and
for twenty years it had been supposed
that the official life of his chief would
come from him. But he is gone ; and
except for a handful of what Americans
would call " campaign " biographies of
Disraeli, along with the personal detail
and pleasant gossip that Mr. Meynell
has now given us in his disconnected
narrative, we have no documented record
of his career. Yet what figure could
stand out with more individual distinct-
ness in the history of his time ? Could
the most elaborate written life do more
than expand or deepen the impression
of him that intelligent students of the
English politics of his day have already
formed ? His novels and speeches and
epigrams, with the report of him that
thousands bore away from personal con-
tact, have etched a character which, we
may be sure, no amount of recovered
letters or diaries could present with fun-
damental difference. Color and body
might be added, but the great outlines
1 Benjamin Disraeli. An Unconventional
Biography. By WILFRID MEYNELL. New
York : D. Appleton & Co. 1903.
are there. " Dizzy always wants plenty
of lights," said his attentive wife. He
lived in full glare. A set biography could
bring out little from dark corners. The
Disraeli tradition has grown up, and we
are entitled to say of it, with the prince
in Richard III : —
" But say, my lord, it were not registered,
Methinks the truth should live from age to age,
As 't were retailed to all posterity,
Even to the general all-ending day."
Men will have their stubborn theories,
of hero or villain, in real life, and so
they will in biography. What an idea
of tenacious conviction one gets, for ex-
ample, from Mr. Meynell's account of
Nathaniel Basevi, Disraeli's cousin. Ear-
ly in his political career, when he was
hard pressed for money, as, indeed, he
long was, Disraeli had applied to his
uncle, Mr. George Basevi, for a loan.
The father called son Nathaniel into
counsel, and the two determined that the
flighty political adventurer, as they de-
cided he was, had no real security to
offer. Accordingly, the request for an
advance met a peremptory refusal. Very
well ; uncles had been hard-hearted and
cousins incredulous before. But note
what followed. Years later, the Right
Honorable Benjamin Disraeli, Prime
Minister of England, was at Torquay,
where Mr. Nathaniel Basevi was living
in retirement. To this Israelite, indeed,
in whom there was no giving in, it was
intimated that his distinguished kinsman
would be glad to receive him, letting
bygones be bygones. But the stout old
gentleman would not budge. He was
not dazzled. Once an adventurer, al-
ways an adventurer, whether starveling
aspirant or triumphant Premier. The
cousin would neither call upon him, nor
be called upon by him. How could Lord
Rowton possibly have converted this
sturdy skeptic ?
Jowett's theory of Disraeli was less
simple or rigorous. He wrote to Sir
R. B. D. Morier in 1878 : " Dizzy is a
curious combination of the Archpriest
286
The Contributors' Club.
of Humbug and a great man." Mr.
Meynell, loyal as he is to Disraeli, — but
also loyal to the truth, — does not wholly
break down the first part of this defini-
tion of Jowett's, though he undoubtedly
brings much reinforcement to the second
part. At a few critical junctures, Dis-
raeli appears tricky, careless of veracity.
There was, for example, that letter which
he wrote to Sir Robert Peel, applying for
office. This in his lifetime he roundly
denied having written. After his death
it was published in the Life of Peel.
Mr. Meynell admits that we have here
something " mysterious." There were
other things betraying a shifty nature.
They helped make Disraeli so intensely
" unpopular " even with his own party, as
one of his colleagues in different Minis-
tries, Lord Malmesbury, frequently noted
in his diary that he was. Yet he made
himself indispensable to the inarticulate
country squires who were the strength
of the Tory party. He could speak.
His fleering audacity in debate and bold
initiative in policy, his merciless attack,
his biting characterization, his immense
gift of language, and his unbounded self-
confidence made him the leader he was
for so many years. Little loved, he was
greatly admired. There was never any
question of his genius, though there un-
fortunately sometimes was of his sincer-
ity. Strong and straightforward natures
somehow found in him no echo. They
caught, rather, an ostentatious, an Ori-
ental note. Asked once what was the
most enviable life, Disraeli replied in a
gleam of self-revelation, " A continued
grand procession from manhood to the
tomb." He had it. The crowd and the
shouting seldom failed him. Opportuni-
ties for display came thick and fast. The
extraordinary favor of the Queen he
knew how to conquer. For his aston-
ishing talents he found a great theatre.
Yet tradition has been just ; it has per-
petuated a faithful picture of the man in
habit as he was ; and no biography, no
matter how full it might be, nor how
many minor myths it might destroy,
could now make posterity see Benjamin
Disraeli in any other essential guise than
that in which his shrewdest and most
sharp-sighted contemporaries have bid-
den us behold him.
IT is usual for teachers to propound
What CM1- <luesti°ns' an(i ^ or children to
dren want answer them, and there is no
doubt about which is the easier
task of the two. To reverse matters, and
also, if possible, to find out what is pass-
ing in the thoughts of my children, I
yesterday confronted them with this de-
mand : " Suppose this morning an all-
wise man were to enter our classroom,
one who could and would answer any
question you chose to put to him, what
six things would you ask ? "
The children were common, ordinary,
every-day boys and girls, between the ages
of nine and fourteen, — but the questions
they put to that imaginary shape from
the All- Wise shades were not common-
place. They surprised me not a little,
and have set me thinking. Perhaps they
will interest others.
The first set of questions was from a
boy of eleven, a little button-nosed, red-
headed chap, and they were all of a geo-
graphical strain : " Who made the oceans
salty ? Why is it that the sun only goes
halfway round the earth? Why is it
that we don't slip off the earth ? If the
earth stopped what would happen to us?
How big is a volcano inside ? What is
the quietest spot in Europe ? "
The next six were a girl's, and all of
them purely personal in their nature, her
motto evidently being, " Know thou thy-
self." — " Who is my future husband ?
When am I going to die ? Where is the
thief that stole my watch ? Please can
you tell me how to draw well ? What
position or situation will I have when I
get older ? How could I be healthy all
my life ? "
A quiet little girlie of ten, who walks
gently in and out of her classroom every
day, and looks demure and purely recep-
The Contributors' Club.
287
tive, produces from the quiet depths of
somewhere these six posers : " Who was
the first school-teacher ? Why are not all
the people in the world the same color ?
Why are boys and girls not the same ?
Why is it that oil will not mix with wa-
ter ? How many feet of snow are there
hi the Rocky Mountains ? Please can
you tell me all about history ? "
A remarkable series is that of a black-
eyed little Jewess, a bright wee maid as
sharp as a needle : " How many jewels
has Queen Alexandra? Will I be rich
or poor ? Who were the first people who
lived in Jerusalem ? How is it that the
more people get the more they want?
Is it true that there is gold and diamonds
on Cocos Island ? When the world comes
to an end, how can the people be united
if parts of their bodies are in different
parts of the world ? "
A young cynic with but half-veiled
irony demands (it is a boy this time) :
" Who was the man that invented gram-
mar ? Who was Your school - teacher
when You was at school? Who first
thought it was wise to have schools ?
What good does history do us ? Did
you ever count the stars, — you think you
know everything ? What does ignorance
personified mean ? "
Many go back to first principles with
mild little queries like these : " Why did
Adam die ? How old is North America ?
What was here before the world was
made? What language did Adam and
Eve speak when they first entered the
world? Who married Cain? Where
was the Lord before He made the world ?
Where was God born ? Are we de-
scendants of the ape ? When we hear
about Christ, He lived at the beginning
of the first century ; was that his first
time on this earth ? If Jesus was born
on the 25th of December, why did they
not begin to count time then instead of at
the first of January ? What would there
be if there was no universe ? When and
how was God the Father created ? What
holds this world up ? What were Adam
and Eve, — English, French, or what ?
Is it true that we were once monkeys ?
How are we to connect what the Bible
says of the beginning of the earth with
what science says ? What comes after
space ? " These are the problems which
occupy our children's minds when they
obediently are doing " simple interest "
for us, or " long division," or pointing
out the boundaries of Europe.
But there are worse to follow : " Why
is a wise man better than an inventor ?
Where do people go when the Mael-
strom takes them down ? How far does
a bird fly without stopping ? Please can
you tell me, if all the people on the earth
were dead, what would happen? Who
made the Sphinx, and when, and how?
When will the Lord come again ? Why
should a girl have more sleep than a
boy ? Is Charley Ross, the boy that was
kidnapped long ago, living, and where ?
I would like to know when and how the
Russian nation came to be so. Why do
large fish eat little ones ? What was the
first show in the Coliseum ? How many
births occurred on Wednesday last in
Canada ? Will perpetual motion ever
be discovered ? In Christ's time were
the people who lived to be hundreds of
years old, 100 years a baby, or 100 years
an old man ? Will the American repub-
lic ever become a limited monarchy ?
When will there be no saloons or bar-
rooms ? When will there be no more
war ? What do men see in tobacco ?
How do earrings make people's eyes
sharper? Is it true that when we die,
we will come back as a cat or dog ? " etc.
The rapid transition of thought strikes
one on reading the question slips. For
instance, were two things more widely
apart than these ever before brought into
juxtaposition : " If you jumped off the
world, and went straight on, where would
you go to ? Who killed Julius Caesar ? "
Or take this pair : " Why did Joseph not
tell his brethren he was their brother the
first time they came down to Egypt to
buy corn ? What is the power of one
288
The Contributors' Club.
of the suckers of a devil-fish ? " Or this :
" When will the Doukhobors go home to
be sensible and eat proper food ? Why
has the elephant got a trunk ? "
The purely ethical questions are, some
of them, very good : " Why are there so
many religious sects and denominations,
as there is only one way, all taken into
consideration, to serve God? I would
like you to tell me why men equally
brave are some despised and some hon-
ored under the same conditions and by
the same country. Is it right to rescue
from drowning a man who is your ene-
my and a scourge to his neighbors ?
When people have great troubles in this
world, why do they not end these trou-
bles ? Why do some people fancy them-
selves above others, when they all have
to die some day, and as we are told
when Christ comes again to judge the
living and the dead we will all be equal,
none above any of the others, — and some
men are great, but the paths of glory lead
but to the grave ? If we live again in
this world will we be better, and will we
be able to have the accomplishments we
have in our present life, to a greater ex-
tent? Can or will we be able to send
messages to each other through our
thoughts ? How ? People say it is wrong
to drink wine. Why then did Jesus turn
water into wine ? When a man murders
another man and then a man hangs the
murderer, is the hangman not a mur-
derer himself ? Do you think the world
will ever become one nation with the
same religion ? Why should the King
and Queen be more powerful and be
treated better than any other person ?
Why should a man be hung if he shot
another man, and in war, if they shoot a
man, they would be praised and thought
much of ? Is it wrong to tell stories in
defense of others ? Is it wrong to sus-
pect ? If so, how are we to know what
to guard against ? Will people who have
had no chance of hearing about God be
admitted to Heaven ? What is the no-
blest life ? " These, surely, all of them,
are thoughtful questions; these young
people are doing their own thinking.
With a few of what even to Swivel-
ler would be " staggerers " we close the
list. Here they are : " Do you know
how people hypnotize each other ? Was
Shakespeare the same as other men in
his age as regards to morals ? Who
wrote the first poem ? Who is the pret-
tiest person in the world ? Will you
please tell me all about the people in
this world ? Where did Mozart, Schu-
bert and the other old musicians learn so
much in the first place ? Why do peo-
ple get sick ? Will women ever be con-
sidered as equal to men in politics and
in business ? What makes some people
so clever and others so stupid? Why
did Noah take some animals into the ark
and leave others to get drowned ? Will
there ever again be as clever a writer as
Shakespeare ? Why do men smoke to-
bacco ? Was Hamlet after his father's
death sane or insane ? Why do people
think differently and after about an hour's
argument think the same as they did be-
fore ? How is it that animals don't be-
come civilized ? Will there come a time
when the castes in India join ? Why
is there such a thing as polotics f What
are people's brains like ? What kind
of a bird was it that first lit in Canada ?
How many hairs are there in a man's
head ? Why can't the owl see in the
daytime ? Why don't people look the
same ? What does the teacher make
us ask these questions for ? Why can't
I always do my lessons right? What
makes me lose my temper so much ?
Why are some people more sensible than
others ? "
It is a boy who writes : " I would
like to know how you could tell mother-
pigeons from father-pigeons," and " Who
invented the first joke ? " — while the
youngest girl in the whole class wrote in
a wee little hand in the middle of a sheet
of foolscap, " Please would you tell me
what my mother thinks every day in her
mind ? "
THE
ATLANTIC MONTHLY:
iftaga$ine of literature; ^cience^ art, anD
VOL. XCIIL — MAR CH, 1904. — No. DL VII.
ABUSES OF PUBLIC ADVERTISING.
[The author of this article in the series devoted to modern advertising is a member of the
National Committee on Municipal Improvement of the Architectural League of America, and
Secretary of the American Park and Outdoor Art Association. His books, The Improvement of
Towns and Cities, and Modern Civic Art, are of recognized authority. — THE EDITORS.]
IN considering the abuses of public ad-
vertising, it is best to admit at the start
that advertising is a thoroughly credit-
able, an important, and even an indispen-
sable part of trade, and that its benefit
is scarcely less to the consumer than to
the producer. Hence, discussion of its
" abuses " means only discussion of the
wrong use of a good thing, — as one
might find, if he wished, a fruitful theme
in the " abuses " of religion or of public
libraries.
As a matter of fact, there are many
different phases of this wrong use of pub-
He advertising, so that they cannot all be
grouped under the two heads, moral and
aesthetic, beneath which they would prob-
ably be placed by a general audience
asked to classify them. There is, for in-
stance, not infrequently, economic abuse.
Yet the wrong uses of advertising that
concern the public are undoubtedly most
often violations of the ideals of morality
or aesthetics.
In so far, however, as advertising is
public, in the sense that it does not make
a personal appeal by inclosure in an ad-
dressed envelope, by appearing on the
front steps of the house, or under the
door, or by its publication in a periodical
admitted to the home, the moral issue has
ceased to be especially pressing. Even
in that personal appeal that is so general
as barely to escape being " public," the
offense (when there is one) is rather in
suggestiveness, or against good taste, than
actually immoral in its character.
The public advertising that vaunts it-
self upon the highway recognizes, as re-
gards moral standards, the force of a pub-
lic opinion that has found itself. It is no
part of the advertiser's business to offend
people, and even had he himself a very
debased moral standard, that of the com-
munity would become his law. So the
moral issue, in fact or in name, is raised
only now and then concerning the public
advertising ; and it is confined for the
most part to a dispute regarding what
may be called the conventional street cos-
tume of the ladies of the billboard, in
communities with a stricter sense of the
proprieties than is common in great cities.
The matter becomes one of local option,
with the advertisers willing enough to
respect the existing prejudices, if they
know them ; since the play can hardly
make a profit in the town that will not
endure its posters. And of all the sub-
jects of public advertising, only one in-
volves these objections.
Thus it is that a consideration of the
abuses of this business must deal mainly
at present with its violation of aesthetic
ideals. There are several reasons for
this. The aesthetic standard of the com-
munity is much less definite and concur-
rent than the moral ; and advertisers, con-
290
Abuses of Public Advertising.
sidering the matter one only of taste, have
no special compunction about offending
such a standard as may exist. They
may even glory in shocking the eye, on
the ground that thus they will make an
impression, and that, willy nilly, their an-
nouncement will be remembered. So in
the business of public advertising much
is done that an intelligent and increas-
ingly large section of the public may
properly deem an abuse of the public's
aesthetic rights ; and there is coming to be
serious question concerning these abuses,
and what steps can be taken to check or
to remedy them.
The first question of the exasperated
citizen is likely to be an impatient inquiry
whether the whole business of display
advertising in public cannot be stopped ;
whether the advertisers may not be
driven to the newspapers and magazines
to make their announcements, pictorial
or printed ; or, at best, be suffered to
make public announcement only on the
premises occupied by the business adver-
tised. If the step were possible, it would
be sheer folly to take it. This kind of
advertising has been accurately described
as an attempt " to call people's attention
to something for which they are not seek-
ing, but which it may be for their advan-
tage to know." How long some of us
would live without certain little conven-
iences or luxuries of table, toilet, or dress,
and what a business we should have to
make of watching the papers for amuse-
ment announcements, if display adver-
tising in public were not constantly call-
ing our attention to such matters, insur-
ing us from overlooking them ! The
producer's need of advertising would not
exist, did not the public need it also.
The next question, and one repeatedly
advanced by those who write letters to
newspapers, is whether it may not be pos-
sible for an " enlightened " public opinion
to make its influence felt, and to compel
respect for its taste by the advertisers,
through means of the boycott. If the
goods offensively advertised were not
so often the best goods of their class,
and if, through the very aggressiveness
of their advertisement, their names did
not stick in the mind when the article
of modest announcement has been forgot-
ten, there might be a chance for the pro-
posed boycott to succeed. But now all
the weight of psychology and the force
of our poor sheeplike human nature are
against it.
Shall we give up the fight, then ; shall
we offer no obstructions to the ever ris-
ing flood of public advertisements ; shall
we abandon our towns and cities to them,
relinquish the dream of dignity, peace,
and beauty in our surroundings ; shall
we hold nothing sacred, • — sky or ocean,
rock or tree, public building, church, or
monument? The churches and monu-
ments of Paris have served as boards for
despised and fluttering posters ; trees
have died that their dead trunks might
advertise a pill ; romantic scenery has
been forced to offer reminder of ache or
appetite ; the glory of the sunset silhou-
ettes against the sky the title of a break-
fast food ; and the windows of the de-
fenseless home look out on circus girls,
corsets, and malt whiskey. There is need-
ed no apology for an assertion that the
business has abuses ; and clearly, if we
cannot deal with it in one general act
of prohibition or of boycott, there yet
must be expressions and developments
upon the abusive quality of which we
all shall agree. For such abuses correc-
tion should be possible ; but we must be
fair, for against unreasonableness even
the bulwark of law and ordinance cannot
stand.
First, then, we may consider the dese-
cration of natural scenery. This was one
of the earliest and most flagrant of the
abuses. It is still so rampant on lines
of heavy travel that its correction seems
a futile dream, and yet in response to
a public opinion that is proceeding cau-
tiously and reasonably in its demands re-
forms are in progress. The Associated
Billposters of the United States and Can-
Abuses of Public Advertising.
291
ada now officially condemn the practice
of painting signs upon rocks and other
natural objects in picturesque landscapes,
although they seem to offer no objection
to putting a hoarding for posters and
paintings in front of the natural object.
The distinction is a fine one, but it means
some gain. Several railroads have pro-
hibited the erection of billboards on their
own property ; and although this scarcely
disturbs the advertiser, who can still use
the private property on either side of the
right of way, it shuts out one possible ex-
tension of the abuse that has tremendous
possibilities. In at least one case, also,
a great railroad company has taken to
planting quickly growing trees at such
places as to hide the hoardings erected on
adjacent land. The Boston and Albany
Road has gained a like end in the subui-bs
of Boston by planting screens of shrubs or
a hedge at the top of the cut ; and it has
become no unusual thing for a railroad
company, conscious of the popular feel-
ing, to exert its influence, as far as it can,
upon the adjacent property owners, to in-
duce them to refuse to lease advertising
rights. But a public opinion, that very
unanimously considers the extension of
hospitality to advertisements by a barn
or other outbuilding, or even by a field,
as a badge of the farmer's poverty, is per-
haps doing more than, is anything else to
remedy this abuse.
When the natural scenery is not that
of the free and open country a new phase
of the difficulty appears. If it should
be easy now for the public to keep adver-
tisements out of a domain which the pub-
lic has reserved for its own enjoyment,
the very circumstance that the excep-
tional beauty or grandeur of the scene
attracts multitudes of visitors makes the
field one especially coveted by the adver-
tiser. He cannot enter, but he can go
to the border. For example, two govern-
ments have united at great expenditure
to preserve from violation the majesty of
Niagara Falls. Yet on a strip of untaken
territory, in full view from nearly every
vantage point, an enormous hoarding
overlooks the cataract. If it stands upon
Canadian soil it advertises an American
business, so that the enterprise is as
fairly international as must be the recog-
nition of the sign's unfitness there.
In The Billposter for January, 1903,
there was the statement : —
" At a seaside resort you will find all
classes gathered together, all looking for
health, rest, and happiness. At these
places every one is at ease, there are no
business cares to worry or annoy, and
when people are in that peculiarly happy
frame of mind, they are more easily im-
pressed, and the impressions last longer
than at any time.
" As all advertising is simply the in-
denting of certain facts into the minds of
the public, then at no other place can
these results be reached as quickly or as
surely as at a seaside resort. In large cit-
ies busy men and women may not always
have the time to see a billboard or bulle-
tin, but at a seaside resort they take the
time to look at it, to read it, and to store
up the statements."
This is the argument of the advertiser.
It is the explanation of a development in
the business that we all perceive to be an
abuse. Its logical conclusion would find
in the city parks, created that the people
might there find rest and throw off the
protective shell of hostile indifference,
which in town is their only safeguard
against nervous exhaustion, a capital site
for billboards. But the public saw this
danger, and the parks were saved from
trespass. The advertiser accordingly ob-
tained a footing on private lands in sight
of the parks, and there erected posters
that should scream across the meadows,
overtop the shrubs and bushes, and peer
among the trees. At Niagara Falls he
attained a triumph that was splendid be-
cause he had so little to overcome ; but
in kind it did not diffe'r from the petty
victories on the park borders of count-
less towns and cities. Thus it has lately
become clear that the public must go a
292
Abuses of Public Advertising.
step farther, fully to safeguard its own
reservations. It must regulate the ad-
vertising on the adjacent land.
In Massachusetts a legislative bill be-
came a law in the winter of 1903, confer-
ring upon " the officer or officers, having
charge of public parks and parkways in
any city or town " of the state, authority
to " make such reasonable rules and reg-
ulations respecting the display of signs,
posters, or advertisements in or near to
or visible from public parks or parkways
entrusted to their care, as they may deem
necessary for preserving the objects for
which such parks and parkways are es-
tablished and maintained." Violation of
the regulations adopted was made pun-
ishable by fine. The enactment of such
a law had been vigorously contested for
years, and it was only after a strong and
very interesting opinion, upholding its
constitutionality, had been secured from
the attorney general, that the public-
spirited bodies engaged in pushing the
bill were able to secure its passage. Now
that the bill is a law the fact that there
was such a fight vastly strengthens it. A
1 The principal contest in regard to this legis-
lation was waged over the point whether the
state, if proposing to take from the owner of a
piece of land a right that might be valuable (as
the display of advertisements), should not take
this right by eminent domain and compensate
him for its loss, rather than under the police
powers without compensation. Following are
some extracts from the attorney general's opin-
ion:—
" Any use of private property which materi-
ally interferes with the public comfort, except in
those cases where the reasonable requirements of
the owner afford him justification or excuse, is a
nuisance. Noises and odors have always been
treated as nuisances, even without legislative
adjudication that they are unwholesome. . . .
" There is no legal reason why an offense to
the eyes should have a different standing from
an offense to the other organs. To strike the
unwilling ear is in principle the same as to
catch the unwilling eye. . . .
" Persons whose property is affected by such
restrictions have no right to compensation, be-
cause one of the incidents to property is a condi-
tion that it shall not be so used as unreasonably
to impair the interests of the community. . . .
test case, however, has been carried into
the courts.
Of the rules adopted by the various
park boards in response to the author-
ity thus granted, those of the Metropoli-
tan Commission may be fairly taken as
a type. They prohibit the erection or
maintenance of any sign, poster, or ad-
vertisement within such distance of the
park or parkway, or in such place, as
shall render its " words, figures, or de-
vices . . . plainly visible to the naked
eye within such park or parkway." But
from this prohibition they except, on
land or building, one advertisement not
exceeding fifteen inches by twenty feet,
and relating exclusively to the property
on which it is placed, " or to the business
thereon conducted, or to the person con-
ducting the same." These rules, which
have been accepted as " reasonable," yet
safeguard even the borders of the re-
served domain.1 In Chicago there had
been adopted, two years before, a local
ordinance declaring that any billboard
within two hundred feet of a park or
parkway, and more than three feet
" Since the public good justifies the spending
of money to produce an aesthetic effect, the
court will not hold that a. reasonable regulation
to preserve the effect for which the public
money was spent is beyond the power of the
Legislature."
Another argument brought forward at the
hearings was that the principal value of the right
to be curtailed had been created by the public
as an incident to the establishment of the much
sought public pleasure grounds, and that it was
proposed to curtail the right only in so far as
its exercise interfered with the public purpose
which gave rise to its value. The question of
compensation has lately had a similar decision
in Prussia, where within a few months the par-
liament has enacted a bill " to prevent the dis-
figurement of places remarkable for their nat-
ural beauty." The bill empowers police courts
(elective municipal bodies) to prohibit "such
advertisement boards and other notices and pic-
tures as disfigure the landscape outside urban
districts." No exception is made for the place
or purpose of the sign, as the one criterion is
disfiguring effect ; and no compensation is al-
lowed. This measure also had very thorough
discussion before it was passed.
Abuses of Public Advertising.
293
square, was a public nuisance, and should
be torn down ; and in New York an or-
dinance to like effect had been passed
even earlier. It would seem that the
principle, which has had such thorough
examination, must apply with equal fair-
ness in other states and cities, and thus
that one popularly recognized abuse of
advertising may be remedied.
From the thought that advertisements
may be properly restricted in certain
places in a town, because of the injury
they do to a desired aesthetic effect, it is
no long step to a belief that the right
should be given to the municipality to
determine where they may or may not
be put, in all parts of the town. To illus-
trate : a few years ago the London branch
of a Chicago firm caused two huge adver-
tisements to be so placed at Dover that
they were staringly visible against the
background of the cliffs. Although no
park scenery was affected, protests ap-
peared in the newspapers, not only of
Dover, but of London and other cities ;
and a strongly signed petition was pre-
sented to the Mayor and Council beg-
ging for interference. The officials re-
quested the firm to forego its privilege,
and the firm declined. The Mayor and
his colleagues then appealed to Parlia-
ment, and secured the passage of a bill
giving to the Corporation of Dover the
power to grant advertisement licenses for
such sites as it saw fit, and to require the
removal of any advertisements for which
there was no license, unless they were
exhibited within a window, or gave notice
of an entertainment to be held on the
land or in the building that bore them.
So the step was taken. And the history
of its taking at Dover is little more than
a repetition of the circumstances which
had caused it in 1897 to be taken in
Edinburgh, with the result that Edin-
burgh has been called the pioneer in the
municipal regulation of advertisements.
But if the thought that town or city
can designate the places on which adver-
tisements may be shown, and can prohibit
their erection elsewhere, has seemed to
be reached by entirely natural steps, it
is not to be supposed that this conception
has failed to encounter vigorous opposi-
tion from the advertisers. It is too sim-
ple and sweeping a panacea to the abuses
of advertising for them calmly to submit.
Fully to understand this, we should go
back a little and note that there have been
three interesting movements in progress
in the advertising business : (1) Its amaz-
ing increase in the last few years, and
the multiplication and growing extent of
what may be called its abuses ; (2) the
consequent increase of public interest,
concern, and occasional resentment, with
no little hostile legislation resulting ; (3)
the affiliation of local billboard interests
into a national body, for the purpose of
more successfully opposing adverse pub-
lic action.
The line of battle has thus been clearly
drawn. The public in a thousand com-
munities recognizes certain developments
of advertising as abuses, and is trying to
check them, while the advertisers are
standing together for what they call their
rights. A fourth movement that should
develop with us, and for which there is
already call, is a similar coordinating of
the local public efforts. This has been
accomplished in Great Britain, first by
the organization of a National Society for
Checking Abuses of Public Advertising
(" Scapa "), and second by the formation
of the Parliamentary Amenities Party.
The latter is a committee, of which
James Bryce is chairman, made up of
members of both houses of Parliament,
who agree to stand by and stand for the
preservation of civic and rural amenities
and to oppose unfavorable legislation.
To accomplish its purposes, the com-
mittee appoints a small sub-committee
which keeps in communication with seven
societies that exist for the furtherance of
one or another phase of these amenities.
There are plenty of societies in this coun-
try, and the work to be done now is
to make possible their concerted action.
294
Abuses of Public Advertising.
Until this has been accomplished, the
warfare between the public and the ad-
vertisers must be a series of guerrilla con-
flicts which can be of little satisfaction
to either side. The narrative also be-
comes difficult to write, for it is made up
from various small specific contests that
have to serve as types. These can best
be marshaled into order by now imagin-
ing ourselves as entering the town.
In the open country " the enemy " had
gathered in strongest force along the
steam road, the trolley road, and high-
way ; coming into town we have observed
that the parks are safe, and that the
advertisers are retiring even from park
boundaries. But we shall see that in the
town there is the hardest fighting. Here
the advertisers have most to lose. Such
satisfactory conditions as those described
in Edinburgh and Dover are exceptional
in Great Britain, and are probably with-
out parallel in the United States. Most
communities have to deal separately with
a large variety of abuses.
Possibly the first to attract attention is
the fixture of advertisements to trees.
This is done in the country also, but in
the city it tends to become a prevalent
rather than an occasional evil. There is
a state law against it in Massachusetts ;
in New Hampshire one must have a writ-
ten permit from the tree warden ; and
municipal ordinances against the abuse
have become throughout the country far
commoner than is their strict enforce-
ment. It is clearly an economic waste
to endanger the life of a beautiful tree
that has attained its growth only after
years by affixing to it posters of doubtful
interest to-day and of none to-morrow.
The abuse is so palpable that there has
been little difficulty about making it ille-
gal ; but the advertisements put on trees
are generally small, and public opinion is
careless about the law's enforcement.
Frequently the ordinance designed to
1 These words are taken from the opinion
written by Justice Martin of the Court of Ap-
peals (New York) in the case of the City of
protect the tree classes with it the tele-
graph, telephone, and lighting service
pole, though the abuse in this case as
far as the public is concerned is much
less obvious. But the fixture of posters
to a pole is almost as bad for the pole as
for the tree, and if an ordinance does
not protect it the company to whom the
poles belong is likely to require that ad-
vertisers keep away. In the larger cities,
therefore, this evil — recently so serious
— is beginning to be checked.
Advertisements on the trees seemed an
abuse so outrageous as to demand im-
mediate attention ; but the billboards that
in the country were scattered, now that
the town is reached, commence to close
in upon us. They line the street where
there is vacant land ; they are erected even
upon roofs ; they are no respecters of fine
views, of neighborhoods, of civic dignity,
of pretensions to civic pride or stateliness.
They may rise billboard upon billboard,
two " decked " or three ; they are of all
kinds, — some neat and orderly, and
some with torn posters on broken boards,
thoroughly disreputable. It is plain that
the billboard question of the cities is not
one question, but many ; and it is here
that the guerrilla warfare becomes most
in evidence.
There is no public demand that the
billboards be utterly suppressed, — only
that they be regulated ; and if we are to
regulate them we must determine what
of their developments may be fairly called
abuses. Excessive height certainly is
one. Municipal ordinances usually at-
tack this under the building laws, on the
plea that hoardings wholly unlimited as
to height and dimensions " might readily
become a constant and continuing dan-
ger to the lives and persons of those who
should pass along the street in proximity
to them." * There is, as pointed out in
some communities, an added danger from
fire.
Rochester against Robert West (1900), all the
judges concurring.
Abuses of Public Advertising.
295
This effort to limit the height of bill-
boards affords, by the way, some interest-
ing illustrations of the unequal conflict
now going on between the united bill-
posters and a public that lacks union.
An ordinance was adopted in Buffalo, for
example, a few years ago, to limit the
height of billboards to seven feet. It
was contested, and the battle was carried
from court to court, until finally the ordi-
nance was approved by the highest court
of the state. The Billposters' Associa-
tion, in order to become a foreign corpo-
ration and thus come under the jurisdic-
tion of the Federal courts, then obtained
incorporation outside of New York, and
began injunction proceedings in a United
States court to prevent action under the
ordinance. By this means long delays
were gained, and the fight is now being
made for the Buffalo posters by the Na-
tional Association. This is thoroughly
organized, and its system is said to be so
complete that it practically controls the
situation in every city and town in the
United States.
The location of the billboards may be
a not less aggravating abuse than exces-
sive height, and it is even more frequent
in its annoyance. We have seen how the
thought that a city can forbid the placing
of billboards in proximity to a park may
lead by a natural advance to its claim of
the right to determine where they shall
be located, in all parts of the town. But
the step, if natural, has proved too radi-
cal to be taken as yet except on the rar-
est occasions, and the billposting com-
panies are restricted in their choice of
desirable sites only by the easy task of
finding a land-owner who is willing to
lease to them a strip of property that
otherwise probably brings him nothing.
It has been many times suggested that a
reasonable condition to impose would be
the procurement of the consent of the ad-
jacent property holders. A man should
not be suffered to do with his property
that which his neighbors consider a nui-
sance. In Chicago this requirement has
been put into an ordinance which de-
mands that no billboard be erected on a
residence street without the consent of
three fourths of the frontage in the block
concerned. Another suggested require-
ment is that the billboards be put back a
certain number of feet from the building
line, with the result that they shall be vis-
ible only when one is directly in front of
them, and shall not mar the street vista.
The measures that have been adopted
in some foreign cities for the control of
advertisements, generally, of course affect
hoardings in particular, since these ex-
ist expressly for advertisements. They
will be touched upon later. Meanwhile
it is only fair to say parenthetically that
even the billboard, with all its faults, has
good points and has improved. A well-
built hoarding, with neatly framed post-
ers, may be so much preferable to an
abandoned vacant lot as to be by com-
parison no nuisance. And with the enor-
mous growth and more efficient organiza-
tion of the advertising business, there are
factors naturally at work to remedy some
of the more glaring billboard offenses.
The hoardings are better constructed ;
they are kept in repair ; the posters have
distinctly improved in artistic character ;
it is becoming the custom, in order to
secure greater effectiveness, to set each
poster within its own frame or moulding ;
and this, with a standardizing of sizes,
tends to lessen somewhat the discordance
of the always inharmonious battery.
Finally, the advertisers themselves have
learned that mere multiplicity may go too
far ; and now in almost every city there
are advertising rights which are leased
but not used, because the signs displayed
are rendered more valuable through the
keeping of neighboring sites vacant.
That the best billboard may invite to
acts behind it that are contrary to the
law, and may be so offensive in itself to
a neighborhood as actually to decrease
the value of property, is good evidence
that the possibilities of advertising abuse
are very many in the billboard, and that
296
Abuses of Public Advertising.
unless the hoardings are legislated out
of existence no general restrictions can
guarantee unfailing satisfaction. There
will always remain cases to be separately
judged. In justice, therefore, it ought
to be acknowledged that the hoarding is
not wholly evil, however fruitful a source
of evil ; and that the billboard which is
a civic abuse iu one place may not be
one somewhere else.
Of other advertising developments, the
so-called " sky signs " are generally re-
cognized in Great Britain as an abuse,
many of the corporations having ordi-
nances prohibiting the erection of signs
of which the letters, standing clear of
a building's top, show against the sky.
This is forbidden even in London. Flash-
lights and certain kinds of illuminated
advertisements are also condemned, on
the ground that they might frighten
horses ; and the use of vehicles exclu-
sively or principally for the displaying of
advertisements is very frequently pro-
hibited. American cities and towns
quite commonly go to the extent of pro-
hibiting the stringing of banners across
the street, or requiring for the act a spe-
cial permission that is rarely granted
except to political parties. Projecting
signs, standing out from building fronts,
have so many possibilities of abuse that
ordinances almost always hedge them
about, determining their minimum height
above the sidewalk and their maximum
projection and size.
It may be well at this point, lest these
and other curbs to the advertiser's free-
dom to ply his business how and where
he pleases seem too onerous, to ask our-
selves just what would be a reasonable
ideal in the display of advertisements
on the street. For our modern civic art
is not impractical. It would not exclude
from its dream of the city beautiful the
whir and hum of traffic, the exhilarat-
ing evidences of nervous energy, enter-
prise, vigor, and endeavor. It loves the
straining, striving, competing, as the most
marked of urban characteristics, and in
the advertising problem it will feel, not
hostility, but the thrill of opportunity.
It will recognize evils in the present
methods, but will find them the evils of
excess and unrestraint, and it will perceive
possibilities of artistic achievement by
which even the advertising can be made
to serve the ends of art dans la rue. As
far, then, as abuses are concerned, civic
art would predicate its desire for restric-
tions upon the conception of what the
street reasonably ought to be. Any ad-
vertising display out of harmony with this
conception would be considered an abuse.
There would be required, first, a clear
path for travel by walk or road, which
means that advertisements must retire to
the building line. Second, there would
be insistence that no announcement in-
trude upon the vista of the street. These
requirements purport, concretely, that
civic art — that is, the art of making
cities dignified and beautiful — would
prohibit advertisement erections of any
kind at the curb or on the sidewalk, and
would suffer no public utility, or ornament
of the way, to be placarded ; would frown
upon projecting signs, and would have
no banners hung across the street. It
would sweep, the street clean of adver-
tisements from building line to building
line. And, on the buildings, it would re-
quire that there be some respect for the
architecture ; it would not have adver-
tisements plaster a fagade. In this mat-
ter it has a positive as well as a negative
creed, but that is not part of a discussion
of the abuses of advertising.
Of the restrictions thus demanded sev-
eral have already had mention. In re-
gard to the removal of bulletin boards,
signs, and transparencies from a position
on the sidewalk, probably the most in-
teresting case for citation is that lately
offered by the Merchants' Association of
San Francisco. This is interesting be-
cause the prime movers in demanding the
ordinance and its rigid enforcement were
merchants, — not a few visionary and
impractical idealists, but the advertisers
Abuses of Public Advertising.
297
themselves ; and the action, formally
taken after long thought, was that of the
association which represented them, and
which is one of the strongest commercial
bodies in the United States. The ordi-
nance excludes everything except clocks,
and refuses to permit any advertisement
on these. It should be noted in con-
nection with this that when all the adver-
tisers of a community are subject to the
same prohibition, no one is put at a disad-
vantage ; and that, without restrictions,
there may be a competition between ad-
vertisers which will prove a very serious
abuse to them.
The fixture of posters to monuments
and other public ornaments of the way
is not attempted in this country ; but
two years ago it was a serious abuse in
Paris. The public utilities are usually
protected by ordinance, whether owned
by the municipality or public service cor-
porations, and lately there has been an
interesting extension of this restriction
by its application to railroad structures.
Chicago offers an example in an ordi-
nance adopted last fall. It requires that
the advertisements on so much of the
elevated railroad structures and stations
as is not on the company's own right of
way — that is, for instance, on stations
built over cross streets — shall be re-
moved. In London advertising on rail-
road bridges is forbidden, and in Glas-
gow and many other cities of Great
Britain advertisements are not allowed
on the outside of the trams. This was
an advertising abuse that had become
much more serious in England than it
ever has become with us. Finally, any
advertisements on the public buildings
or on the pavements, or the scattering of
handbills in the streets which the city is
trying to keep clean, may be properly
called an advertising abuse that it is ut-
terly inconsistent for the city to allow.
There is philosophically also an essen-
tial fitness in the protection by a city of
its own property from advertising disfig-
urement ; for if the community as a body
cannot be loyal to a wish for civic dig-
nity and beauty, or does not on its own
property set an example, it cannot ex-
pect its citizens to be zealous and partic-
ular. It has the advantage, too, that it
can be frankly loyal to an aesthetic ideal,
while the citizens have to show that the
advertisement to which they object does
injury and is a nuisance. They also are
distracted by conflicting interests, and
find it difficult to judge impartially of
the good or evil of advertisements from
the standpoint that the city, in its aloof-
ness, takes. And no other course than
the protection of its property is logical
for a community that is spending money
not merely to keep clean and neat, but to
secure positive aesthetic results by main-
taining parks and squares, and by erect-
ing handsome public buildings, fountains,
and statues.
A grievous mistake, therefore, is made
when a town undertakes to advertise its
attractions by means of a monster hoard-
ing beside the railroad. This is an abuse
of advertising that is growing somewhat
in frequency. In the West you will
often come to a town with a town-sign ;
but the best thing that a town can have
is an ideal, and a civic spirit that will
work for that ideal. The town-sign re-
veals, more emphatically than it says
anything else, the crudity of the vision
which the community has: The condi-
tion is sad enough when the great city
of New York presents to the stranger on
the viaduct of Brooklyn Bridge only a
sea of signs ; but he does not think quite
as badly of it as he would if the city
itself had officially set up the signs, —
to show him that it was thriving ! He
would have then considered it thriving,
and nothing better.
Akin, in lack of consistency, to a
town's deliberate and official marring of
its beauty by the erection of a hoarding
is the permission which associations that
exist to uplift communal life sometimes
grant to advertisers to use their property.
The Academy of Design in New York,
298
Abuses of Public Advertising.
having purchased a spacious site for a
beautiful new home, let for advertising
purposes the boards surrounding its pro-
perty. These were covered with a huge
sign to advertise a five-cent cigar, while
on the same premises the society was
conducting free art classes in an effort
to train the taste of the youth of New
York. It is clear that all the advertis-
ing abuses are not due to the advertisers.
A degree of responsibility rests upon the
public itself.
In occasional discouragement, the
champions of a better sort of advertising
may well ask, now and then, " Whom
shall we trust ? " This feeling, and, above
all, the knowledge of the immense and
rapid growth of the business, of its in-
creasing resources, and its efficient or-
ganization, have inspired a fear that has
led to attempts to control it and restrict
it as a whole. Foreign cities and nations,
managing this more easily than can the
United States, offer a number of inter-
esting examples. France and Belgium
have a tax on posters, and such an impost
has been proposed in England. It is
easily levied by means of stamps, and
through the proportioning of the tax to
the size of the poster considerable re-
straint is exercised. The tax also makes
it possible for the government to scruti-
nize the advertisements before they are
set up, the law requiring their submission
before posting. In France the poster tax
brings in something like four millions of
francs a year. In the cities of France,
Belgium, Germany, and Italy, the post-
ers must be placed on columns or other
devices especially prepared for the pur-
pose. These are placed at designated
spots, are of a design approved by the
municipality, and are frankly artistic in
effort.
In New York state a bill was intro-
duced in the Legislature in the winter of
1902, and received influential backing,
for the imposition of a stamp tax on post-
ers, the suggested tax being one cent per
two square feet, measuring the greatest
length by the greatest width. The bill
was opposed by the labor and other in-
terests, and failed to pass ; but the intro-
duction of the measure was not a little
significant. In Pennsylvania there was
enacted last winter a law which makes it
necessary for the advertiser to secure the
written consent of the owner or tenant
upon whose property a sign or poster is
attached, and prohibiting altogether the
fixture of advertisements (save legal
notices or announcements pertaining to
the business conducted on the premises)
to any property of the state or of any coun-
ty, township, or city in the state. In Illi-
nois last winter a bill was introduced and
valiantly championed which would have
given to the officials of the cities, towns,
and villages of the state the " power to
license street advertising and billboard
companies, and regulate and prohibit
signs and billboards upon vacant proper-
ty and upon buildings advertising other
business than that of the occupant." The
measure was fought aggressively by the
billboard trust, and at last it failed.
Now these bills are significant because
they go to show that in this country also
popular attention has been aroused to the
abuses of public advertising. Any seri-
ous extension of these abuses is likely
to provoke an adverse legislation that
will be costly to the advertisers. This
significance is the more marked when
the origin of the bills is examined. Be-
hind the bill which was introduced in
New York state was the American Scenic
and Historic Preservation Society ; the
bill that became a law in Pennsylvania
was fathered by the American Park and
Outdoor Art Association, which has on
this subject a standing committee, to
whose interesting latest report this paper
is much indebted ; the Illinois bill was
introduced at the request of the Munici-
pal Art League of Chicago. The public
has not yet united, as have the billboard
people, — but it has taken the first step
in forming itself into organized bodies
for the waging of the contest. If any
Race Factors in Labor Unions.
299
abuse becomes very serious these bodies
can be depended upon to act together,
if they do not combine. And there are
these hopeful elements in the contest:
the public does not and will not fight to
suppress advertising, but only to restrict
it to reasonable proportions ; the adver-
tisers do not want to offend the public,
but are bound to respect any genuine
popular sentiment. As it is not war to
the death, but a mutual adjustment of
opinions (which have differed because
of different points of view), that is be-
fore us, in the just settlement of the ad-
vertising problem, mere discussion must
help to cure the mistakes on either
side.
Finally, there is this to be said : the
advertisers can gain their ends in other
and unobjectionable ways. In the bare
recital of abuses it may have seemed as
if there were so many that, should they
all be checked successfully, there would
be left to the advertiser small chance to
proclaim his wares. But that is not true.
He would still have opportunities, sub-
stituting — with much gain to the com-
munity and probably with some to him-
self — for mere bigness and multiplicity
of announcements a quality of attractive-
ness. There would lie the new compe-
tition. He has already learned that em-
phasis is gained not only by screaming
a word, but by pausing before and after
its utterance. He is finding it more pro-
fitable to put his colors together harmo-
niously than to shock the eye. He has
discovered that if he can entertain and
amuse the public with jingles or clever
names or well-drawn pictures, he makes
more impression than by shouting. Thus
advertisements now render many a long
ride less tedious than it used to be, and
even win for the billboards some friends
where before, because of the abuses, all
must have been their enemies.
Charles Mulford Robinson.
RACE FACTORS IN LABOR UNIONS.
[The author of this paper is professor of economics in Harvard University. His investigations
in preparing his well-known work on the Races of Europe peculiarly qualify him to treat the
present theme with authority. — THE EDITORS.]
SOME months ago Wall Street was cur-
rently reported to be suffering from an
overload of undigested securities, — the
result of unprecedented industrial pro-
motion. This situation has now resolved
itself into the " digestion of insecurities,"
through the long process of financial liqui-
dation which has been in progress since
last summer. American trade-unionism
to-day, while numerically prosperous be-
yond comparison, shows symptoms of the
same disorder. The incubus, in this case,
consists of a vast new and as yet but half-
assimilated membership.1 This condition
1 The recent phenomenal rise of trade-union-
ism in the United States is traced by the writer
in the World's Work for November, 1903.
of instability in labor organization as
compared with Great Britain is, in part,
due to the racial peculiarity of the popu-
lation of the United States. Ethnic het-
erogeneity enormously complicates the sit-
uation for all parties concerned, but espe-
cially for the working classes themselves.
Consider the situation for a moment.
For half a century about one seventh
of our total population has been regu-
larly constituted of persons born outside
the United States; and for twenty-five
years at least, one third of our people
have not enjoyed the inestimable privi-
lege of American-born parentage, that is
to say, with both parents native born.
More than half of the population of the
300
Race Factors in Labor Unions.
North Atlantic States in 1900, nearly
two thirds in Massachusetts and Rhode
Island, and three fifths in New York
and Connecticut, — all primarily manu-
facturing communities, — was of foreign
parentage, wholly or in part. True, the
proportion is almost as high in Wiscon-
sin, Minnesota, and North Dakota ; but
these states are mainly agricultural. This
proportion of alien blood, high enough
for the population at large, is more
marked in the cities, which are the main
centres alike of industry and of trade-
unionism. New York and Chicago are
more than three fourths of foreign par-
entage. Boston and Pittsburg follow
with about two thirds of their population
as yet imperfectly American ; while in
some of the smaller industrial centres in
the East, the proportion of foreign par-
entage rises above four fifths, — as in
Lawrence, Holyoke, Fall River, and
Hoboken, — almost rivaling Milwaukee
in this regard. Boston is largely an
Irish town ; Chicago is said to be the
third largest Bohemian city in the world.
It would be easy to duplicate in size
many of the large cities of Europe in the
foreign-born population of our munici-
palities. These proportions, be it ob-
served, are for our great cities as a whole.
We may push the comparison still far-
ther by considering the proportion of pop-
ulation of foreign extraction, not only
in the great cities at large, but in their
industrial sections separately. As an ex-
ample, tbe custom clothing trade of New
York may be mentioned ; wherein, on the
authority of the United States Industrial
Commission, it was found that nearly
three fourths of those employed were di-
rect immigrants ; while among the tailors
in the same city the proportion of actual
foreigners rose to upwards of ninety per
cent.
These proportions of alien blood are
very marked among the so-called work-
ing-classes, recruited as they are directly
from the Old World. The reservoir of
onr industrial population is indeed sup-
plied from the bottom rather than the
top. The data for 1900 are not yet
available, but prediction is not difficult.
While approximately half of the total
population of the United States in 1890
was born in the United States of Ameri-
can parentage, only about forty per cent
of the population engaged in manufac-
tures was thus doubly dyed American.
About one fourth of those so employed
in industry in 1890 were born in the
United States, although their parents
were foreign born ; and nearly one third
of the industrial class was constituted of
actual immigrants. Such being the con-
dition, how great is the task of the trade-
unionist in the attempt to bring these
aliens into any permanent organization,
foreign as they^re to one another and to
us in every detail of life. Not only a
large number of undigested trade-union-
ists has to be dealt with, but a mass of
imperfect Americans as well. In 1900
there were a million and a quarter white
persons in the United States who could
not speak English, this being about one
eighth of our foreign-born population
over ten years of age. Even when by
the use of interpreters — and the United
Mine Workers sometimes have to use
three or four different ones in their gen-
eral meetings — these foreigners can be
made to understand what is up, consider
how various are their social standards
and customs. What is mere bread and
meat to a Swede may be cake or taboo
to a Russian Jew, according to the dic-
tum of his rabbi. A subsistence mini-
mum to a German is luxury to a Pole.
The old adage about " fleas upon fleas "
finds application here. The English and
American workman is underbid by the
Scandinavian. He in turn is cut under
by the Jew and Bohemian. The Pole
will take less even than these, and finds
at last his standard of living undermined
by the Syrian and the Armenian. Even
the lowly have their different social
standards to uphold. The Jew will not
permit his wife to work in a factory, and
Race Factors in Labor Unions.
301
insists upon sending his children to
school ; while the Italian is the hardest
of taskmasters to his own family. The
Polish factory Lands are predominantly
women and young girls. The Bohemian
will not allow religious scruples to inter-
fere with his livelihood, while the Jew
must observe his religious holidays at
any cost. The Finns and Syrians prefer
to work, if at all, in bunches, under their
customary clan rule. The individualistic
Jew will throw up his job rather than
work in a factory, subjected to its neces-
sary and rigid discipline. Then again the
workmen all have their political antago-
nisms and inherited hatreds. It is said
that the Austro - Hungarian Empire is
held together only by the life of the ruling
sovereign. We annually receive many
thousands from these warring national-
ities of Austria-Hungary alone. The
Czech hates the German ; and the Hun
and the Slovak will not work together.
The Finn feels toward the Russian as —
shall we say ? — the Irish regard the Eng-
lish. Even within the same nationality
these hatreds are observable. The Pole
from Austria bears an inherited hatred
of the Pole from Russia. All hands
dislike the Jew, the Syrian, and the Ar-
menian.
Certain curious differences in attitude
respecting labor organization are observ-
able among these different nationalities.
The English and Scotch take to team
work like ducks to water. No sooner
are they landed than their trade-union
cards have given them a status among
their fellows. This is partly due to nat-
ural aptitude, but more to long practice
in the school of experience at home. The
German workingmen take their places in
the trade to which they were born, and
speedily comprehend the novel problems
of the new residence. The Swedes are
said to be hard to organize, but become
excellent members when once initiated.
One branch of the clothing trade in Chi-
cago, the " special order " business, has
been entirely remodeled under their con-
trol. These Swedes have, in fact, com-
pelled the Jewish, Polish, and Italian
home finishers of clothing to come into
an organization. The Bohemians also
speedily become ardent unionists. They
are reputed to be " good stickers " in
a strike, and are ready to support the
organization through thick and thin by
prompt payment of dues. In this re-
spect they contrast sharply with the
Poles, who have well earned their racial
opprobrium of strike breakers. Excel-
lent workmen showing great endurance,
and seemingly capable of great speed in
piece work, in many parts of the country
the Poles show an especial zeal for house
owning. They are industrious, but are
hated by their neighbors in industrial dis-
tricts because they apparently have little
sense of working-class solidarity. The
long course of Polish history seems to
have made them over-docile and submis-
sive. Their priests appear to be partly
responsible for this attitude of hostility
to labor organizations. It was through
them, for example, that the Chicago
strike of 1896 was broken. This pecu-
liarity of the Poles has operated greatly
to increase their representation in the
clothing trades of our great cities. An
agricultural, outdoor people, they would
not seem otherwise to be well suited to
this sedentary occupation ; yet clothing
contractors, discovering that the Poles
will refuse to go out on strike with the
Jews and Bohemians, at the behest of the
labor leaders, have encouraged the Polish
shops as a consequence. The only na-
tionalities more hated by the trade-union-
ist are the political rough-scuff of Europe
now coming in ever-increasing numbers,
such as the Armenians, Greeks, and Syr-
ians. These are all lumped as strike
breakers in a class by themselves. And
where employed in large establishments,
as in a prominent Philadelphia house,
they are so disliked as to make it neces-
sary to segregate them in departments by
themselves.
The French Canadians, who are flock-
302
Race Factors in Labor Unions.
ing in increasing numbers into the indus-
tries of New England, show little liking
or aptitude for trade-union organization
and discipline. This is partly due to
their low standard of living, making them
content under conditions which would en-
gender a strike among other peoples ; but
I am inclined to the belief that the main
reason for their backwardness lies in the
transient character of their employment.
They are birds of passage to a consider-
able extent. It is estimated that from
fifty to seventy thousand come and go
from Canada into New England for em-
ployment in the cotton mills alone. In
this respect they resemble the South
Italians, and the " Blue-noses " who come
down from Nova Scotia to work in com-
petition with American carpenters. Most
of these people, especially the French
Canadians, remain only so long as times
are good. When the mills are shut down,
as in the recent Lowell strike, they be-
take themselves to their farms again.
The French Canadians seem to be even
less useful unionists than the Portuguese,
who are increasing so rapidly in the same
part of the country. These people are
reported to be trustworthy members of
working organizations. Only when the
French Canadians have been long enough
in the cities to become thoroughly Amer-
icanized do they respond to the demands
of the trade-union leaders. This peculi-
arity of the industrial population of New
England will serve to explain, in part, a
curious contrast between the labor situa-
tion in Great Britain and the United
States. In England the cotton mill oper-
atives have one of the oldest, and, next
to the miners, the most powerful organ-
ization in the country. It is over a half-
century old, and numbers 130,000 mem-
bers. Practically all of the Lancashire
cotton mill operatives of all grades are
enrolled in it. This exemplifies the close
relationship between labor organization
and the development of the factory sys-
tem. On the other hand, our New Eng-
land cotton mills were the first, and have
always been the most notable, examples
of industrial organization on a large scale.
Yet, strange to say, the New England
cotton mill operatives have never suc-
ceeded in building up an organization
of any great importance. This anomaly
is doubtless due in part to the generally
amicable relations which have subsisted
between the employers and operatives ;
but it is also due in part to the large
number of French Canadians who dom-
inate the situation.
The position of the Jewish race in in-
dustry is a peculiarly interesting one.
Their activities are almost entirely con-
fined in this country to a few trades, such
as tailoring, cigar-making, and the like.
This is not due to any previous industrial
training, for scarcely more than ten per
cent of the Jewish immigrants seem to
have been tailors, for example, at home ;
while in New York, until recently, practi-
cally all of the clothing manufacture was
in their hands. The race is, in fact, con-
demned to follow these sedentary trades
because of its physical disabilities. By
reason of their predominance in these
few chosen occupations the condition of
trade-unionism therein plainly reflects
certain racial peculiarities of the Jews.
Professor Commons, in his excellent re-
port on Immigration, for the United States
Industrial Commission, aptly described
the situation in the assertion that even as
a trade-unionist the Jewish conception of
organization is that of a tradesman rather
than a workman. The Jew will join a
union only when there is a bargain directly
in sight in the shape of material advance-
ment. His natural timidity renders him
otherwise unaggressive ; so that he is apt
to be inconstant in his allegiance to the or-
ganization during flush times when wages
are high and work is plenty. The Jew-
ish unions have consequently in the past
shown a rather abnormal fluctuation in
their membership as compared with other
organizations. Even in this period of
trade-union activity, the clothing trades
since October, 1902, are almost alone
Race Factors in Labor Unions.
303
in showing considerable decline in their
membership. Nevertheless, the Jews are
rapidly learning, under the leadership of
peculiarly able men ; and no more splen-
did service in uplifting the lot of the lowly
can be found than that rendered by the
warfare of the United Garment Workers
of America against the sweat shops.
The future of the Jew in the labor
field is bound to be interesting. Under
novel American conditions he is begin-
ning to invade many other trades. For
example, I have in mind a very large
shoe factory, which, by reason of the
harassing exactions of the unions in a pro-
vincial trade centre, moved to one of
the large cities as an experiment. The
first feature to attract my attention in
visiting this model plant — for such it is
in its mechanical equipment — was the
extraordinary number of Jews. Their
presence was rendered peculiarly notice-
able by the fact that the Jews were all
men, working in rooms in direct compe-
tition with Irish-American and German
girls and women. In other words, men
were competing at women's work. This,
many of the more virile nationalities will
not undertake. In this instance it ap-
peared that a vast reservoir of cheap
male labor had been tapped. These Jews
were rapidly adapting themselves to the
new trade of shoemaking. As in tailor-
ing, these men developed an extraordi-
nary speed in piece work. This, together
with their low standard of living, enabled
them to compete on even terms with the
women operatives. These city Jews are
as yet unorganized except in the clothing
and cigar trades, but it is not without
interest to note that they labor under an
autocracy no less formidable than that
of the walking delegate. In this par-
ticular instance I chanced to visit the
establishment just after an enforced re-
ligious holiday of three or four days.
The absence of the Jews seriously crip-
pled the entire factory of several thou-
sand hands, nor was there any argument
or board of conciliation which could sub-
due the operatives or their rabbis. In-
dustry had run afoul of a deep-seated
religion ; and industry had to give place.
A new element in the labor situation was
apparent, threatening to prove no less
menacing to the calculations of the em-
ployer than his previous interviews with
strike committees.
The first step toward assimilation of
the various nationalities in our country,
where the trade is large enough, is by ef-
fecting the labor organization not only by
occupations, but by nationalities within
each trade. Where, as among the Jews
in the clothing industry in New York,
they are all of one race, the question is
relatively simple. On the other hand,
in Chicago, in the same business the sit-
uation is very different. The trade there
is recruited from Swedes, Bohemians,
and Jews in about equal proportions, the
remaining quarter being composed main-
ly of Poles, with a scattering of Ger-
mans. New York has had for fifteen
years a headquarters of unionism in the
United Hebrew Trades. The only dis-
turbing element now is the presence of
the Italians ; but in Chicago the conten-
tion is not only against the avarice and
cupidity of the clothing contractors, but
against the racial antipathies of the op-
eratives among themselves. In Boston,
the Italians in this industry, most of whom
cannot speak English, are allowed to
form by themselves a section of the local
union. They meet in a separate room,
debate matters of importance in their
own tongue, and transmit their votes to
the general assembly through an inter-
preter-representative.
Interesting examples of the organiza-
tion of trade-unions by nationality are
given by Professor Commons in the ex-
cellent report to which reference has al-
ready been made. The longshoremen
on the Great Lakes have for some years
had a powerful and efficient organization
which has greatly improved their lot.
This occupation is recruited from the
Swedes, Italians, Finns, Slavs, and Por-
304
Race Factors in Labor Unions.
tuguese. The difficulty of maintaining an
organization has been partially overcome
at Ashtabula, for example, by having a
local union for each nationality. A cen-
tral council composed of English-speak-
ing delegates from the local unions is an
essential part of the same scheme. A
similar arrangement is made in many in-
dustries in Chicago, notably in the wood-
working trades, where the Germans, Bo-
hemians, and mixed English-speaking
unions are maintained separately. The
Chicago carpenters likewise have sep-
arate and distinct unions for the French,
Bohemians, Swedes, Germans, and Jews.
The hod - carriers, originally polyglot,
have now reorganized along similar lines,
with separate unions for Germans, Bo-
hemians, Poles, and English-speaking
peoples.
There are certain disadvantages, how-
ever, in this form of organization along
racial lines. Take the United Mine
Workers, for example. Their ethnic het-
erogeneity is probably greater than that
of any other occupation, over ninety per
cent of them, as a whole, being actually
of foreign birth. Only about half of the
miners can speak English at all. This
English-speaking group is about half
Irish, with the remainder constituted of
Welsh, English, German, and Scotch.
Most of these latter are native born, being
one generation removed from the original
immigrants. They are mainly in charge
of the collieries as superintendents, bosses,
engineers, pump runners, and skilled
artisans. The other fifty per cent of
the miners are about half Poles, leaving
the remaining one quarter of the entire
body of miners about evenly divided be-
tween Ruthenians, Letts, and Hungari-
ans. A few Italians and some Bohemians
are scattered through the fields. Of these,
the Poles are increasing most rapidly
since 1890. Formerly the United Mine
Workers were organized as far as possi-
ble along racial lines, but the attempt
has been abandoned for two reasons. In
the first place, it affords no chance for
the men to learn English ; and, secondly,
the different nationalities are so geo-
graphically scattered that organization
has to be effected on the basis of locality
for purposes of convenience.
The racial heterogeneity of our Amer-
ican population affords a rare opportunity
to the Irishman. It will never cease to
be a surprise to me that the Irish, who
have never been allowed to govern them-
selves, should show among all the races
of the earth the greatest aptitude for the
control of political organizations. One of
the most peculiar features of our Ameri-
can labor problem is found in the leader-
ship which the Irish have assumed in the
movement. Thus, for example, while
not more than one fourth of the United
Mine Workers are of Irish extraction, it
appears that more than three fourths of
the officers and organizers are of this
stock. Curious upon this point, I have
taken some pains to examine the avail-
able data. Two years ago the United
States Industrial Commission took testi-
mony from nearly seven hundred wit-
nesses from all parts of the United States.
Seventy-nine of these were representa-
tives of organized labor. Judging by
their names, — an imperfect criterion, to
be sure, — thirty of these seventy-nine, or
about forty per cent, were of Irish blood,
while only twenty-eight of the labor lead-
ers bore English names. The remainder
were Germans or Jews. The American
Federation of Labor annually publishes
a list of officers of its affiliated national
unions. Twenty-nine out of ninety-six
unions, or about thirty per cent, so list-
ed a year ago were officered by men of
Irish extraction. The proportion of Irish
leadership varies greatly, of course, as
between different trades and sections. It
is but natural that Irish trades should be
officered by men of the same nationality.
One would naturally expect the bricklay-
ers, stone masons, lathers, and plasterers,
and the street and dock laborers, to
elect Jrish leaders. The Irishman domi-
nates the building trades all over the
Race Factors in Labor Unions.
305
country. Nineteen witnesses before the
Industrial Commission represented or-
ganized labor in testimony concerning
the Chicago strike of 1900. Of these
more than half were Irish. In one hun-
dred and twelve unions in the building
trades in New York, about forty per cent
of the officers were of the same national-
ity. Analyzing the returns from different
parts of the country, the same high pro-
portion is manifested. In Massachusetts
twelve out of twenty city Central Labor
Unions were officered by Irish ; and of
twenty-two local unions listed for Con-
necticut fourteen were so officered.
The Irishman tends to monopolize the
situation, not alone in the distinctively
Irish trades and states, but peculiarly in
proportion as the rank and file in the or-
ganizations are composed of the inert,
non-Teutonic, unpolitical peoples of the
earth. He will hold his fair proportion
of the offices in a company of Scotch,
English, Swedes, or Germans ; but his
place is securely at the head of the line
in a company comprising Bohemians,
Slovaks, Huns, and Italians. The rea-
sons are perfectly obvious : a ready com-
mand of English makes the Irishman
their natural spokesman ; his native elo-
quence makes him a most effective or-
ganizer; his strong sense of personal
fealty makes him peculiarly faithful to
the organization. Add to these qualities,
tact, a generous good nature, and aggres-
sive fighting qualities, and a rare combi-
nation is the result. They are precisely
the qualities which have given the Em-
erald Isle so predominant an influence
in the direction of our municipal political
affairs. Kipling has put it well : —
" There came to these shores a poor exile from
Erin ;
The dew on his wet robe hung heavy and chill ;
Yet the steamer which brought him was scarce
out of hearin'
Ere 't was Alderman Mike inthrojucin' a bill."
One of the strangest features in the
American situation, as contrasted with
Great Britain, is revealed by this unique
VOL. xcni. — NO. 557. 20
position of the Irish. They tend to dom-
inate and direct the policy of our Amer-
ican unions ; while in the United King-
dom, they seem not only to have been
backward, but rather unsuccessful, in
the councils of the trade-unionists. The
early English labor organizations were
for a long time unable to assimilate the
Irish either to their theory or to practice.
According to the reliable chronicle of the
Webbs, conditions of fraternal relation-
ship amounting to tacit, if not formal,
federation prevailed between the British
and the Scotch trade-unions ; but, after
years of vain striving to incorporate the
Irish successfully, the attempt was in
some cases abandoned, as in 1840 by
the Friendly Society of Operative Stone
Masons. The records of years are filled
with criticisms of the Irish trade-union-
ists from the British point of view. Even
in 1892, according to the Webbs, no less
than four principal Irish branches of the
Amalgamated Society of Tailors suffered
rebuke for their shortcomings. One of
the difficulties in another case was well
put : " Holding that there was only one
element of danger, and it was the put-
ting of too many Irishmen together."
We need not examine as to details. The
failings were those which we all recog-
nize as peculiar to the Irish as a people.
Far be it from me to underestimate the
fine qualities and the magnificent contri-
butions of the Irish- Americans to our
national well-being ; but with their vir-
tues certain shortcomings are to be found,
which are in many cases coincidentally
attributable to our labor organizations.
Not least among these are the qualities,
admirable in certain predicaments, of
aggressive combativeness, of blind and
enthusiastic loyalty, too often coupled
with an inability to husband resources
against a time of need. Could the lead-
ers of our trade -unions guard against
eveiy one of these faults, all human,
but also — may we say so ? — peculiarly
Irish, the proportion of successes to fail-
ures in the labor movement might be con-
306
Race Factors in Labor Unions.
siderably increased. Our labor leaders are
too seldom tactful and compromising, and
their followers are not quick enough to
sink their personal loyalty in a judicial
habit of mind. And the third fault
which we have mentioned is a peculiarly
flagrant one, namely, the financial reck-
lessness of the organizations in time of
stress. In this respect a powerful con-
trast with the policy of their British con-
temporaries is noticeable. This may
form the topic of further discussion in
another place.
What is the attitude of the native
American, or, shall we say, of the Ameri-
canized mind toward labor organization ?
Assuming that it is a question of indi-
vidualism, or of personal initiative and
independence of action, versus collectiv-
ism, or subordination to a class will, this
question would appear to be answerable
by psychological analysis. One would
naturally expect the free-born, liberty-
loving American to rebel against the so-
called tyranny of an organization, espe-
cially when the policy of that organization
is dictated by a foreign-born majority.
Such analysis by an appeal to mere psy-
chology is, however, dangerous to an ex-
treme in industrial questions. The fac-
tors are too complex. Action is too often
a compromise between conflicting im-
pulses, — the love of individual freedom
as against the desire for material advance-
ment. Too often, also, the question is
merely a quantitative one, turning upon
the degree of individual subordination
within or without the organization.
Without organization the isolated work-
man may be entirely at the mercy of the
employer ; within it he may still be as
clay, but the potter, at least, is one of his
own class, while he himself has a turn at
the wheel. The only satisfactory answer
as to the native American attitude is to
be found in the recorded facts of indus-
trial life. It is difficult to obtain statis-
tics, and not always easy to believe them
when once they have been found. Only
one investigation have I been able to find,
and that from a predominantly agricul-
tural state, — a fact rendering the returns
inadequate and somewhat inconclusive.
The Minnesota Bureau of Labor made
an especial attempt some years ago to
discover whether the trade-unions in that
state were controlled by the foreign
born, and also as to the attitude of the
unions toward American boys seeking
admission. Returns were received from
1985 workmen. Of this number 59 per
cent were born in the United States, and
41 per cent were of foreign birth. In
the general population of Minnesota, on
the other hand, only 38 per cent of the
males of voting age were native born.
This was taken at the time to mean that
native-born workmen were one and a
half times as frequent in the trade-unions
as in the adult male population at large.
The phenomenal growth of unionism in
recent years in the United States would
seem also to support this contention, for
such progress could never have obtained
without successful appeal to the great
body of artisans of American birth.
On the other hand, it seems clear that
the native American, as well as the for-
eigner, must be educated to appreciate
trade-union standards. He must indeed,
as the advocates of organization affirm,
often be forced into the organization in
the first instance, in order to test its bene-
fits. Whether as a free-born American
he will thereafter remain an ardent trade-
unionist must depend upon the judgment
which he may form after joining. Dr.
Bushe'e, in his excellent monograph on
Ethnic Factors of the Population of
Boston, observes that rural Americans,
particularly those from northern New
England, do not appear to favor the
labor organizations. Another interesting
instance tending to confirm this view as
to the attitude of the rural American is
offered by the experience of the United
Mine Workers. This is described in the
excellent report on Immigration to which .
reference has already been made. For
seven years after the organization of the
Race Factors in Labor Unions.
307
United Mine Workers in 1886 they
struggled against the competition of the
unorganized miners in southern Illinois.
Even at the present time they are seek-
ing ineffectually to enroll the native-born
West Virginia miners in their organiza-
tion. In Illinois, however, the case is
more interesting, because the standard
of living is considerably higher than in
West Virginia. In 1899, in the mine
districts of northern Illinois there were
as few as 11 per cent of American-born
miners, while in the southern part of the
same state 80 per cent of the miners
were pure-blooded Americans. These
latter were in the main farm laborers,
who resorted to the mines as a source of
ready cash. These Americans were of-
ten willing to work for less than half the
price per ton paid in northern Illinois.
This they could do because of the greater
thickness of the veins and their compara-
tive ease of working. The competition
of such wages was, however, none the
less severe. Finally, these American
miners were persuaded to come into the
organization by the foreign-born miners
in the northern part of the state. We
need not deal with the relative adjust-
ment of wages effected, other than to say
that it aimed to equalize not the earn-
ings, but the competitive conditions. The
important point for us to note is that the
American-born miners were induced to
demand higher wages, in order that their
foreign-born competitors in another dis-
trict might obtain a living wage. Or-
ganization aimed to benefit both parties,
but the initiative came surely, not from
the American, but from the foreign born.
The significant query for the student
of American conditions is as to the future
attitude of these Americans. Will they
continue to be docile in the hands of
their old leaders ? Or will they here, as
elsewhere, assume a more positive role in
directing the policy of the organization ?
The future of American trade-unionism
will depend largely upon the attitude thus
assumed, not alone by these American-
born miners, but by workmen of Ameri-
can parentage and tradition in every line
of industry throughout the country.
Whatever our judgment as to the le-
gality or expediency of the industrial
policy of our American unions, no stu-
dent of contemporary conditions can
deny that they are a mighty factor in
effecting the assimilation of our foreign-
born population. Schooling is primarily
of importance, of course, but many of
our immigrants come here as adults.
Education can affect only the second gen-
eration. The churches, particularly the
Catholic hierarchy, may do much. Pro-
testants seem to have little influence in
the industrial centres. On the other
hand, the newspapers, at least such as the
masses see and read, and the ballot un-
der present conditions in American cities,
have no uplifting or educative power at
all. The great source of intellectual in-
spiration to a large percentage of our
inchoate Americans, in the industrial
classes, remains in the trade-union. It
is a vast power for good or evil, accord-
ing as its affairs are administered. It
cannot fail to teach the English language.
That in itself is much. Its benefit sys-
tem, as among the cigar-makers and
printers, may inculcate thrift. Its jour-
nals, the best of them, give a general
knowledge of trade conditions, impossi-
ble to the isolated workman. Its demo-
cratic constitutions and its assemblies
and conventions partake of the primitive
character of the Anglo-Saxon folkmoot,
so much lauded by Freeman, the histori-
an, as a factor in English political edu-
cation and constitutional development.
Not the next gubernatorial or presidential
candidate ; not the expansion of the cur-
rency, nor the reform of the general staff
of the army ; not free-trade or protection,
or anti-imperialism, is the real living thing
of interest to the trade-union workman.
His thoughts, interests, and hopes are
centred in the politics of his organization.
It is the forum and arena of his social
and industrial world.
308
A Roman Cabman.
Are the positive educational advan-
tages of trade-unionism, in the solution
of our pressing racial problem, more than
offset by the evils which attach to the
labor movement in its present status?
If the raw immigrant finds himself ruled
by leaders of the Sam Parks type ! If
he observes that the end in view is not
to increase the efficiency of the work-
man, but rather to enforce rules for the
restriction of output, in order to " do "
the employer ! If the opportunity for
his children to fit themselves to become
honest artisans is closed by absurd re-
strictions concerning apprentices ! If the
policy of " graft " is kept to the fore by
secret agreements with capitalistic mo-
nopolies to down their rivals, and jointly
fleece the consumer, as has recently been
revealed in the case of the New York
Realty and Construction Company, the
Chicago Coal Dealers' Association, and
others, of a like kind, which might be
named in our own Massachusetts ! If
recruits are to be gained and held, not by
the promise of tangible benefits, social
and financial, but by the methods of the
foot-pad and the anarchist ! If these be
the lessons taught by the Unions to their
neophytes, the future is dark indeed.
The friend of Unionism can only hope
that these shadows are cast by passing
clouds, and that a brighter day for hon-
est labor effort will ensue.
William Z. Ripley.
A ROMAN CABMAN.
IT was in the vast, solemn precincts
behind St. Peter's that I saw him first.
Coming out under the pale November
sky after a morning in the Vatican sculp-
ture gallery, I suddenly found the cab-
stand at its portal the most grateful sight
in Rome. He stood third or fourth in
the line, and he had neither moved nor
spoken, though his eye caught mine with
a sympathetic sparkle. I saw that his
small, black horse was plump and glossy,
that the whole equipage, from his own
dress to the well-brushed cushions of the
open victoria, looked scrupulously neat;
and, bidding the man drive to the Piazza
di Spagna, I sprang in, with no thought
beyond that of making this last course in
a busy morning as comfortable as cir-
cumstance permitted.
" Your horse wastes no time," I said,
when we came out into the great square,
and shot across it through the spray of
the fountains toward the bridge of Sant'
Angelo.
" No, signore ; the Moor is never lazy.
That is his name, — the Moor, from the
accident of his color, as one sees ; he eat
well, sleeps well, and goes on all his foi
feet, — not so badly."
" And is treated not so badly, — as one
also sees."
The man laughed. " Eh, signore, we
have nothing to complain of, either of
us. We understand each other, the Moor
and I, and take the world lightly."
" ' A merry heart goes all the day ! '"
thought I, with Autolycus. " What bet-
ter motto for a cabman ? " Then, think-
ing aloud, I added, " You are a vei
cheerful philosopher."
He turned to look down at me, laugt
ing louder than before. " I am a mar
like another. Che, die! After fifty
years of life, one adjusts himself to the
seat, — or Dio mio ! one gets do\
signore ! "
There was no more to be said, just
then, for we had crossed the river, and
our intricate way toward the Corso deep-
ly engaged both the Moor and his master.
Meanwhile, their cheery vigilance im-
pressed me so favorably, that when I
A Roman Cabman.
309
spoke again it was to secure them for the
afternoon ; and by the hearty wish for
good appetite given me as I alighted at
the hotel door, I was convinced that the
master, at least, if not the Moor, still
found cheer in the prospect.
I sat, smoking, near a window that
overlooked the courtyard, when the man
drove in at the appointed hour. And,
waiting on to finish my cigar, I had for
the first time a good look at him. In
figure he was below the middle height,
broad-shouldered, sturdy, and erect ; nat-
urally dark, he was bronzed by years of
Roman sunshine ; his cheeks were deep-
ly furrowed, his features large and clum-
sy, plain indisputably ; so that his face
would have been heavy, dull even, but
for the smile that seemed always to lurk
under his gray mustache, and the re-
sponsive light in his sharp, black eyes.
The soul of good-humored jollity illumi-
nated him now, as he stood chatting with
the portier j the horse put up his nose
for a caress, and he turned in his talk to
stroke his Moorship's neck affectionately.
The hint thus given of their pleasant
comradeship suggested a familiar horse-
dealing phrase, which, mentally, I ap-
plied to both. " Sound and kind ! " I
thought ; and found no occasion to qualify
that first judgment through any after
knowledge. In all my travels along the
world's highways a sounder and kinder
pair than this, most assuredly, I have
never known.
That afternoon, we drove far out upon
the Campagna, where my tired brain
sought rest and rumination from the
morning's labors. The sky had clouded
over, and in the mild, gray light the
softened plain, stretching hazily off to
the Alban hills, brought to eyes over-
occupied with artistic detail their natural
refreshment. We followed the old Via
Latina, at first, toward the arches of the
Claudian Aqueduct, by grass-grown walls
and crumbling tombs ; then, turning from
the straight road, we took a winding cart-
path through open meadows and rough
pasture-land, into the heart of the wil-
derness ; until, nearer than Rome itself,
stood out the white villages of the snow-
capped hills, — Genzano, Ariccia, Rocca
di Papa, — my companion identified
them, one and all, — and the wine of
Genzano was not so bad ! At a sharp
turn of the road we drew up on a bit of
rising ground, to consider the strange,
sombre landscape ; and, looking back
upon the city walls and towers, I asked
my genial guide where he lived. Point-
ing with his whip, he explained that he
lodged in the Trastevere, close under the
Janiculan Hill ; as we looked, in line with
the cathedral dome. Then I inquired his
name, and learned that he was called
Bianchi Andrea, — the surname coming
first, in the usual Italian fashion. And
when I commented upon this custom,
" Why not ? " said he, " since every one
calls me Bianchi, — except my wife."
Ah, he was married, then ? " Oh yes,
signore." And he had children ? " No,
signore ; there was a child once, — a
daughter, — but, alas ! . . . there is a
grandchild, signore, — a boy, who lives
with me, — very quick and capable, —
Hector is his name."
We drove on, encountering no living
creature but a shaggy dog, left on guard
over his herd that grazed in a neighbor-
ing field. An inquisitive pair of crows
circled lazily above our heads ; then, with
croaks of disapproval, flew off to join
their flock hovering over the great sepul-
chral tower on the Appian Way. Be-
tween us and that noted landmark of the
Campagna stood a solitary farmhouse to
which my vetturino drew attention. One
could find fresh eggs there at a bargain ;
we must pass its door ; might he have
the signore's permission to buy the raw
material for an omelet, to celebrate his
name-day, which fell upon the morrow ?
To wait for a little moment only ?
Of course this favor was granted him ;
and as we approached the farm I looked
at it curiously. Never had I seen a
drearier dwelling-place. The stucco of
310
A Roman Cabman.
its walls was stained and weather-beaten ;
the outbuildings were ruinous ; all seemed
deserted as well as neglected, for no one
stirred to question us. A whistle from
Bianchi was unanswered. " Agostino ! "
he called ; then, muttering, " The boy
sleeps, lazy hound ! " he handed me the
reins, with a "permesso, signore ? " and
went off upon his errand.
The haze was fast turning into mist,
through which I heard the sound of
wheels. It came from a peasant's cart,
rude and cumbersome, with the custom-
ary wisp of hay attached to a forked stick
projecting from one of the shafts. At
this primitive lure, just out of his reach,
the horse, as he labored toward me, made
ineffectual plunges. I watched his slow
advance with a smile, suddenly discover-
ing that I was watched in my turn by
the man and woman who sat behind him.
They wore peasant costume ; the man.
gray, uncouth, listless, held the reins
loosely, as if he were half asleep ; but
his lack-lustre eyes fixed themselves upon
me with a vacant look, strangely forbid-
ding. The woman at his side, though
by no means old, had faded early, after
the manner of her countrywomen. Yet
her face showed signs of former beauty ;
and she had in her bright colors an air
of self-conscious picturesqueness that sug-
gested a posing contadina from the Span-
ish Steps, rather than a toiling one. As
if she fancied that my smile was meant
for her, she leaned forward to return it,
and seemed about to speak a friendly
word. But either her intent changed,
or I deceived myself ; for she drew back
without the greeting, and to my good-day
only muttered a forced reply. " He is
a foreigner," I heard her say to her com-
panion, as they passed. Then, at a little
distance, both turned to stare again in-
tently ; I looked away ; looked back, to
find them still staring. So they moved
out of sight mysteriously, like spectres of
the mist, leaving a chill behind them.
The sinister effect, however, was only
of the moment. In the next, out came
Bianchi, with the farm-hand whom he
had called Agostino, — a shy, sickly boy,
who turned from me with a smile to wish
his compatriot a merry night of feasting.
At this word, Bianchi pointed to his
small purchase of eggs, wrapped in a red
handkerchief. " IScco, signore ! Per la
festa di San? Andrea ! " Chuckling, he
stowed them carefully away under the
box-seat, and we drove off ; slowly, at
first, for the road was heavy and steep.
As we climbed up from the hollow, the
sun burst through the clouds, glorifying
the ruined farm buildings, when I turned
for a last look at them, with a shaft of
golden light. But now before the door,
where I had waited, stood the cart which
had passed me by ; two peasant figures,
descending from it, entered the house ;
they were gone hi a flash ; yet, clearly
enough, they were the figures that I had
seen, — the man and woman whom my
presence for some reason had discon-
certed.
The sunlight faded, the mist shut
down. Consultation with Bianchi shed
no gleam upon my small adventure. He
had not seen the uncouth wayfarers, nor
could he .recognize them by my descrip-
tion. The farm was leased to a shep-
herd, who acted as agent, or fattore ;
honest, as men went, — we were none of
us saints, nowadays ; he was absent in
the pastures, as the boy had stated ; if
one chaffered well, having the wit to in-
vent a " combination " and to make the
most of it, he sold his eggs at a fair price.
Perhaps the strangers had come to drive
a bargain ; they, too, perhaps, kept the
feast of Sant' Andrea ! Why not ?
We drove back to Rome in the twi-
light ; and long before reaching the city
gate I had dismissed the intruders fror
my mind. But to dismiss is one thing,
to forget is another. Who shall say that
the brain really loses the vaguest impres-
sion which it has once recorded ? In
my dreams, that night, the two sinister
shapes of the Campagna passed before
me again, with threatening looks like
A Roman Cabman.
311
harbingers of evil. I woke, and they
were gone, — I laughed at them. These
disturbers of my peace clung to me,
nevertheless, dogging my steps in the
form of a recurrent nightmare. Often,
that winter, I saw them, — at Cairo, at
Luxor, at Damascus, at Constantinople ;
whenever, for any cause, my sleep was
oppressed, the oppression always resolved
itself into that prospect of the wide and
desolate Campagna, with the same grim
peasant figures moving toward me in the
gathering twilight. They never spoke,
they threatened only with their eyes.
Gradually the visitations became more
infrequent, less vivid ; and they might
have ceased altogether, fading even from
my remembrance, but for the accident
of my return to Rome, where, in the
spring, as I journeyed back from the
East, my stay was unexpectedly pro-
longed. So improbable had seemed this
change of plan, that I had neglected to
obtain the address of my good vetturino ;
and an hour after my arrival, as I walked
up the Corso, I found that I missed him
sorely. Rome was a strange, unfriendly
city without his thoughtful assiduities.
By what steps could I regain them ? I
had taken hardly ten steps more, when
lo ! they were mine again ; for the man
drove toward me along the crowded pave-
ment. Upon the instant our pleasant
relations were resumed.
These were the early days of April,
and I was to remain until after Easter,
which, that year, fell late. Winter had
melted away at a breath; the grayness
was all gone ; and under soft white
clouds, which only deepened the blue be-
yond them, Rome kept holiday, for the
most part, in dazzling sunshine. The
roses were coming on ; and when we
drove now over the Campagna, which no
longer was desolate, but gay with nodding
wild-flowers, we often started up a lark,
whose flight was only to be traced by the
sweetest of all bird-songs borne far above
our heads straight into the sun's eye. The
days passed all too swiftly, like the song ;
even though, recognizing them as rare
ones, I clung to each tenaciously, avoid-
ing my kind, and keeping, so far as was
possible, to myself.
One evening (that of Easter Monday,
to be exact) after my coffee and cognac
at the big cafe" in the Piazza Colonna,
much frequented by chattering soldiers,
I grew tired of their noisy argument, and
broke away from it. Having, as usual,
dismissed Bianchi at sundown, I was un-
attached ; on foot, therefore, I made my
way into the Via Nazionale. Glancing
up, I saw that the stars were obscured,
and felt that a shower threatened. I
had no umbrella ; but as I carried over
my arm a waterproof coat of well-tested
infallibility, rain, more or less, would be
nothing. A moment later, when I was
halfway up the hill within a stone's throw
of the theatre, the first drops fell. I
stepped aside into a doorway to put on
the coat, which was of that sleeveless, en-
veloping sort known to Anglo-Saxons as
an Inverness cape, dark gray in color ;
pleasantly inconspicuous, it looked by
night, at least, not unlike the loose cloak
so often worn by Italian men.
As I stood in shelter, muffling myself
about the throat, I started in surprise at
seeing what appeared to be my own
likeness passing swiftly along on the
other side of the way. At home, it is no
uncommon thing for the man of average
height and figure to be taken for some
one else. We are not all, unfortunately,
of a type so distinguished as to induce
the belief that Nature, after our satisfac-
tory development, destroyed the mould.
Yet rarely, at home or abroad, does one,
unprompted, detect a close resemblance
to himself. This, certainly, was the first
accident of the kind in my own experi-
ence ; and it proved so startling that I
shrank from the impression. I watched
the man disappear in the uncertain light,
and thought of old, uncanny tales with
fatal issues. Then I shrugged my shoul-
ders, and, laughing at my own credulity,
turned the other way.
312
A Roman Cabman.
Evidently, it was a gala night at the
Teatro Nazionale. There were many
signs of that besides the highly colored
poster announcing a special performance
of Hamlet, with a famous young actor in
the title part. The bait lured me into a
demand for any vacant place obtainable.
Nothing, absolutely nothing, was the first
answer. Stay ! One of the posti distinti
had just been returned by the purchaser
at the last moment, — far from the stage
it was, to be sure, but still worth having,
even at the advanced price. I closed
the bargain quickly, hurrying on to grope
my way with difficulty ; for the lights
were down, the ghostly revelations upon
the platform at Elsinore already in pro-
gress. They seemed a long way off, as
I settled into my seat, which proved to be
in the right-hand curve of the great horse-
shoe, directly under the boxes. The
proscenium arch slowly detached itself
from the gloom, until I saw its principal
box on the left of the grand tier, still
vacant, elaborately draped with flags
and garlands, — the royal box, decked
for the King and Queen ! The audience,
ever on the alert, awaited their arrival
with an indifference to the mimic court
of Denmark which even the anguish of
the Ghost could not dispel. The pre-
vailing restlessness soon infected me,
and I congratulated myself upon my point
of view, which, though distant, was not
unfavorable.
The curtain fell upon the first act
tamely enough ; the lights went up, mak-
ing the whole place resplendent ; while
the row of chairs in the royal box stood
out conspicuously, still unoccupied. Dur-
ing the long wait, I observed with a stran-
ger's interest alien details, — the shrill
hawkers of books and papers, the per-
sistent, sharp-eyed flower-girls, brazen in
their assurance. Then came the signal
from the stage, the hush of anticipation ;
and at that moment something struck
my shoulder, darting from it into my
hand, — a little bunch of white flowers,
such as the women had been pressing
upon us. But this had dropped from
one of the boxes, surely. I glanced up,
and saw in the third tier, almost over-
head, a woman's face peering down at
me. She drew back, but not before I
recognized the fact that our eyes had
met before ; though when, I failed to re-
collect. Where could I have encountered
those worn, gaunt features, that keen scru-
tiny which seemed at once to warn and
threaten me ? " Grim as fate ! " I mut-
tered ; "they fade early, these Italians ! "
I had thought precisely this before of the
same face, and knew it now. She was
my evil spirit of the Campagna, who had
passed me by on that chill November
afternoon, haunting my dreams long af-
terward. Then she had worn peasant
garb, now she was in lace and jewels :
yet there could be no question of iden-
tity. It was she, beyond a doubt. I
turned from the stage, and, leaning for-
ward in my place, fixed my eyes upon
the box from which the flowers had fall-
en. The lights were down again, how-
ever ; I strained my muscles until they
ached, — in vain.
The second act ended, and still royalty
did not appear. There was manifest im-
patience everywhere, and a general out-
ward movement for the interval. I fol-
lowed, mainly to get a better view of that
box in the third tier, which now was
empty. Going on into the foyer, I stood
in ambush there to watch the faces. All
were unfamiliar. The fateful presence,
having fulfilled its purpose, if such pur-
pose existed, apparently had left the the-
atre. I looked at the flowers in my
hand, and wondered whether they had
been dropped by accident, or whether,
like the eyes that seemed to guide them,
they conveyed some message capable of
interpretation into threat or warning.
The sprays of jasmine were still fresh
and sweet. The better to slip into an
unguarded buttonhole, they were bound
to a long, straight twig from which the
waxed thread had loosened. As I pre-
pared to re-wind it, a gleam of white
A Roman Cabman.
313
underneath resolved itself, upon reversal
of the thread, into a narrow strip of paper
tightly curled about the twig. Unroll-
ing this, I found scrawled upon it in pen-
cil these words : —
" He will not come"
This, then, was her message. Though
without date or signature, the cramped
irregular handwriting had a feminine
cast ; not for the fraction of an instant
could I doubt that it was hers. But the
purport of it ? Who would not come ?
What was his coming or not coming to
me ? Why, of all men, had I been se-
lected at the moment for this covert no-
tification ?
I stuffed the flowers and the paper
into my pocket, and went back to my
place at the sound of the signal-bell, not-
ing by the way that the occupant of the
third-tier box had not returned. The
act began ; and it was well advanced
when, suddenly, at a word of command
the lights flashed up. At once, the voice
of Denmark died away in a broken pe-
riod, while all action upon the stage came
to a standstill. With one impulse the
spectators, high and low, rose at the en-
trance of the Court, which was accom-
plished swiftly and silently. Almost in
the same instant the Queen was seated
in the place of honor, bowing and smil-
ing an acknowledgment of the applause
which welcomed her, while the household
grouped itself in the background. Then
the lights were turned down, the motion-
less actors woke to life, the tragedy re-
sumed its course.
My republican eyes found in the small
ceremonial but one cause for disappoint-
ment, — the absence of the King. I had
assumed, not unnaturally, that he would
be there with the others ; and I was not
the only one to assume it, as much whis-
pered comment about me clearly proved.
But the subject was soon dismissed, and
the whole house became absorbed in the
question of the play, which now swept on
superbly into a triumph for its chief in-
terpreter. At the end, following the au-
dience out at leisure, I found the better
part of it drawn up in the halls and cor-
ridors as if for a supplementary pageant.
What ceremony else ? I wondered, and
was not long in doubt. Down the wide
sweep of staircase, which seemed built
for the purpose, came the Court, pre-
ceded by footmen in scarlet livery ; there
was a glitter of gold lace, a rustle of
silken fabrics, a gleaming of jewels, while
the crowd looked on in solemn silence,
with heads uncovered. All eyes were
bent upon the Queen's face, which now
was sad and preoccupied, deepening by
its look the reverence they paid. I stood
at the foot of the stairs, and could have
touched her as she passed. This un-
looked-for epilogue, at once so stately
and so simple, impressed me profoundly.
Yet it oppressed me, too ; when it was
over, and the last carriage had driven
off, I breathed more freely. Graceful
as the expression of faith in the people
had been, I doubted its worth in view of
the attendant risk. In these perilous
days of death-dealing inventive power,
of fanatical crimes committed in the
name of liberty, was it well wholly to un-
hedge the King of his divinity and leave
humanity unbridled?
" After all, the King was not there,"
I argued, as I walked to my hotel through
the drenched, deserted streets ; " he did
not come." A weak, inconsequent con-
clusion, yet it haunted me all the way
like a refrain, and, seated by the fire, I
found myself reiterating it. " He did
not come." The bit of staircase etiquette
with its dangerous possibilities had given
me a new sensation, which stood foremost
in my thoughts. By way of diverting
them, I pulled out the crushed flowers,
the enigmatic message which read now
like the echo of my own persistent bur-
den. " He will not come, — he did not
come ! " Were the two one and the same ?
Was it the King to whom the woman's
word had reference ? For the moment
I seemed to have solved the riddle. But
314
A Roman Cabman.
why should she desire to furnish me —
a stranger — with that information ?
O
Why, unless she mistook me for some
one else ? No ; I must still be wide of
the mark, for that was inconceivable ;
such a mistake would imply a very close
resemblance ; surely, in Rome I had no
double —
The thought, the word, brought me to
my feet with a sharp cry. No double ?
I had one, and had seen him three hours
ago, — there in the Via Nazionale, a few
steps from the theatre. What if my seat
there had been his, but just relinquished ?
What if through a coincidence, strange
indeed, yet not impossible, I, his counter-
part, had acquired and occupied it ? Ad-
mitting this, the woman's error was the
most natural thing in the world. More-
over, this would explain, as nothing else
could, her interest in me at our former
meeting upon the Campagna. It had
amounted almost to a recognition. She
had been on the very point of speaking,
and her changed purpose held in it a
wonder ill concealed. Why ? Because it
was my fortune or misfortune to be the
living image of a man whom she knew
well, whose presence at the theatre to-
night she had confidently expected.
The more I thought of it, the more con-
vinced I became that in this resemblance
lay the clue to the enigma. But when,
striving to follow the clue, I sought a
definite solution, I was soon lost in pure
conjecture. That my double in some
way had gained in advance the informa-
tion conveyed to me, and so absented
himself from his post, was not improb-
able. But to what did the information
tend ? to whom refer ? That it involved
the King I had really not the smallest
proof. I was, perhaps, merely entangled
in the meshes of some vulgar intrigue,
— some rendezvous, frustrated or post-
poned.
The next morning, for once, the faith-
ful Bianchi failed me. When his hour
came, I received word that he was kept
at home by a slight cold, and that I might
expect him on the morrow, if the day were
fine. Perfect as that was otherwise, it
brought no sign of him ; and fearing that
he might be seriously ill, I went as soon
as possible to his address in the Traste-
vere, which, this time, I had been care-
ful to procure.
The street was a dark, narrow one,
between the river and the Janiculan Hill.
I found the house without difficulty, amid
a long row of dingy tenements. The
cabman's rooms were at the top, up in-
numerable stairs. He lay in bed, rest-
less and feverish, attended by his wife,
a shy, gentle soul, prematurely old. The
place was neat, but poorly furnished. On
one bare, whitewashed wall hung a col-
ored print of the Madonna ; on another, a
crucifix above a shelf filled with tawdry
ornaments. The woman, agitated by my
visit, nervously dusted the one chair in
the room, and, after drawing it for me
to the bedside, fluttered away.
Bianchi was much distressed at the
thought of putting me to inconvenience.
He had tried to come, but the doctor's
order prevented that ; and so he had writ-
ten me a letter by the hand of his grand-
son. It was somewhere about, — on
the shelf perhaps. I did my best to quiet
him, begging him not to talk ; then, as
he insisted, to relieve his mind I looked
for the letter, which lay, as he supposed,
upon the shelf behind me. In taking
it down I accidentally overturned a small
unframed photograph that stood against
a vase which held a spray of artificial
flowers ; and when I picked up the card
to replace it, I could scarcely suppress a
startled cry. For the portrait, taken
from life, was of the woman — my sibyl
of the Campagna and the Teatro Nazion-
ale — who had disturbed repeatedly my
waking hours and my dreams.
After a second look, to make sure, —
as if the face were one that I could for-
get ! — I put back the photograph, and
a few moments later went away without
gratifying or even betraying my curiosity
concerning it. I had questions to ask,
A Roman Cabman.
315
but poor Bianchi was in no state to an-
swer them, and I let them all await his
convalescence or recovery. Fortunately,
for my peace of mind, I did not have to
wait long. His malady with timely care
was soon checked ; in a week he was on
his box again. Then, catching him in
a confidential mood on one of our long
drives together, I soon discovered the
surprising fact that the woman was none
other than his own daughter. She had
been well married in her own class to a
skilled workman of the quarter ; had
borne him one child, the grandson, Hec-
tor, now an inmate of Bianchi's house ;
but, developing ambitious tastes above
her station, she had followed false stan-
dards which she was pleased to call ad-
vanced, — secretly, at first, until detec-
tion precipitated an end that from the
first was inevitable. Then she had left all
abruptly — home, husband, child — for
a rich man, whose creature she had be-
come. He was a brute, a barbarian, a
social outcast, a skeptic, irreconcilable,
irresponsible ; he had cast his evil eye
upon her, and had enticed her away. It
was believed that they were in foreign
parts ; just where, no one knew. The
husband had died ; Bianchi had taken the
boy to bring him up ; but as for the wo-
man, once his daughter, he disowned her,
— she was dead to him. It was his wife,
poor, tender-hearted soul, who clung to
that likeness of her, which he longed to
tear into a thousand pieces. If the si-
gnore understood ! Santo nome di dia-
volo !
His story trailed off into a storm of
oaths that grew inarticulate with tearless
rage. I had no heart to torment him
further by any detail of my own adven-
ture. It could avail nothing to state upon
the best of evidence that his degenerate
daughter was a little nearer than he im-
agined. I let all go, and lapsed back
into silence, while my good friend's wrath
slowly wore itself out. We were coming
in from the Valle dell' Inferno, and at the
Ponte Molle, where the ways diverged,
I chose the Flaminian one, for a turn in
the Villa Borghese.
It was a perfect Roman afternoon.
The old elms of the Villa avenues were
in full leaf ; the wide, grassy slopes
gleamed with daisies, violets, and anem-
ones ; the students of the Propaganda, in
particolored gowns, played ball sedate-
ly on their green amphitheatre, around
which a double line of carriages circled
back and forth in continuous parade. All
ranks were represented, all nationalities.
We were democratic and informal. Yet
we could be formal, too, upon occasion ;
for when the Queen came by in state, we
straightened in our seats and doffed our
hats to her. And when the King fol-
lowed, not in state at all, but driving, him-
self, in a high dogcart with an officer at
his side, we did the same for him, even
more punctiliously, if possible. Then we
drove on among the moss-grown foun-
tains, the gray marbles, the clumps of
ilex, the long vistas of sun and shade ;
until, meeting royalty again in another
segment of the circle, we looked the op-
posite way, according to etiquette, in the
proud consciousness of duty done, — as
if such exalted personages could recall
our humble features and the fact that we
had paid our tribute loyally.
We passed the Queen for the second
time with averted faces, and the King
drew near. Close before him in the ad-
vancing line came a low, one-horse victoria
of no richer appointments than our own.
Almost abreast of us its horse reared and
balked, — plunged, reared again, refused
to go on. Instantly a space opened be-
side us, while all beyond stood still. The
King's way was blocked ; general confu-
sion threatened ; there were contradictory
shouts, which only confirmed the brute
in his obstinacy ; and the man on the box
seemed to have lost control of him. The
stolid fellow, with his hat pushed over his
eyes to shield them from the setting sun,
clutched the reins mechanically, incom-
petently. Bianchi hesitated for a mo-
ment. Then he pulled up the Moor,
316
A Roman Cabman.
handed me the reins, and made a dash for
the bridle of the unruly horse ; he caught
it, dragged him down, was dragged along
in his turn almost to the ground. The
victoria swept past me with its occupants,
a man and a woman whom I scarce-
ly noticed, until the man leaped down
almost at our wheel and disappeared
among the carriages. But not before I
had a good look at his face, — a startled
look it must have been ; for I recognized
in him my double of the Via Nazionale.
Bianchi had conquered. I glanced be-
hind and saw that the horse was quiet-
ed. The victoria drove on without hin-
drance, smoothly enough. But as it passed
my vetturino, he saw the woman, and a
change came over him. His genial face
grew white with anger, then flushed to the
temples. " Canaglia ! " he hissed ; and,
turning after her, repeated with a shout
the obnoxious word, " Canaglia ! " She
paid no heed to it, — was gone. In rage
ungovernable he stamped and spit upon
the ground ; then, recovering himself, he
rushed back, climbed to his box, seized
the reins, and started forward without a
word. The woman was veiled, as I re-
membered, and I had caught the merest
glimpse of her ; yet I suspected instantly
who she was ; before I could confirm the
suspicion, however, a stir in front of us
diverted my thought. I heard a scuffle
in the crowd, a murmur of excitement.
The King passed again, driving as before,
unruffled, at the accustomed gait. A
stern voice ordered us to move on quickly.
As we obeyed, whirling by to join the fast
receding line at its vanishing point, I saw
a man, with his back toward me, led
away by the police, and understood that
within a few feet of us, for some indeter-
minate offense, an arrest had been made.
What had happened ? We wondered
and demanded on all sides, but no one
could enlighten us. When, fifteen min-
utes later, we returned to the scene of our
adventure, the crowd had dispersed, the
carriages were few and far between.
Impending twilight marked the limit of
the fashionable hour, and we turned the
Moor's head toward home. Bianchi 's
low spirits were apparent ; but I forbore
to question him, until, as we crossed the
Piazza del Popolo alone in the dim light,
he gave me a sidelong look so mournful
that it appealed for sympathy. Lean-
ing forward, I whispered, " It was she,
then ! " And he, through his clenched
teeth, replied : " Yes, signore. Here in
Rome, la malcreata ! Oh, the shame of
it ! " with an amazing sequence of mut-
tered imprecations. I let him alone ; but,
later, at the hotel door, shook his hand
and tried to cheer him, — wasting my
words, for he would not be comforted.
The mystery of the arrest was cleared
up in the next morning's paper, where I
read of a bold attempt to assassinate the
King in the Villa Borghese. During a
momentary halt in the line, a man had
sprung — from the earth, as it seemed
— to the carriage-step with a drawn knife
in his hand. Providentially, at that in-
stant the King's horses had started up ;
the man's foot had slipped ; and, falling,
he had been easily disarmed, captured,
dragged away to prison. There he bore
himself with unexampled indifference, im-
plicating no one else, refusing to explain
his motive, or to make any statement
whatever, beyond the simple fact that he
was an Englishman ; a fact doubted by
the authorities. Then followed a rough
woodcut of the prisoner, who was de-
scribed as well dressed and sufficiently
presentable in appearance. The sketch
hardly warranted even this craftily quali-
fied clause about his looks. Yet with its
help I promptly identified my enigmatic
shadow, — run to earth, at last. The re-
semblance, now reduced to its lowest
terms, was most unflattering. But I
could only attribute that to the draughts-
man's lack of skill, and rejoice that
things were no worse, — or no better.
Nothing in the printed report con-
nected the assailant with the blockade in
the line of carriages. The whole affair
had been of a moment only ; and the
A Roman Cabman.
317
man, worming his way in and out be-
tween the wheels, might well have seemed
to spring from the earth. But for his
familiar face, he would have slipped by
me unnoticed. Now I perceived plainly
that, in his deep-laid scheme to gain a
sure foothold and possible escape, the halt
and the small distraction occasioned by
it were important factors. He had reck-
oned confidently upon both ; but he had
reckoned without Bianchi. Through the
vetturino's quick wit and ready resource,
unconsciously working to a purpose un-
foreseen, the scheme had miscarried.
Thus did my spurred imagination, so
long ineffective, suddenly begin to patch
these shadowy proofs together into one
clear, substantial whole.
Nor did imagination stop there. Its
vivid light streamed backward, making
significant my adventure at the theatre.
The abortive attempt in the Villa Bor-
ghese seemed to me no sudden impulse,
but the outcome of a deliberate plot, an
organized conspiracy, in which several
minds had long been actively engaged.
The woman, surely, must be an accom-
plice ; so, likewise, the too incompetent
driver of the victoria, who might or
might not have been her former compan-
ion, the dull-eyed spectre of the Cam-
pagna. Intent upon the King's murder,
they had awaited a favorable opportu-
nity, which almost offered itself on that
gala night in the Teatro Nazionale. Had
the King attended the performance, their
attempt would have been made at its
close, as he walked down the staircase,
within reach of the assassin's hand. But
something had occurred to change his
plan, and word of the change had been
passed on to me, in mistake. The deed
of yesterday proved the tardy de'noue-
ment to which these threads had tended.
For an hour or so I contemplated a
descent upon the police, to put myself
and all my theories at their disposal. But
sober second thought reversed this rash
intention. The ways of the police were
inscrutable. My testimony, as I fore-
saw, would involve me in awkward, not to
say vexatious delays, conflicting with all
my plans, and of most unpleasant publi-
city ; when all was done, it might well be
deemed too slight, and lead to nothing.
The plot, if plot there were, had failed
completely, yielding the law its victim.
Here was a conclusion upon which I could
rest comfortably. It was clear that in
Bianchi's mind the two incidents of the
halt and the attack were unrelated. He
had not seen his daughter again ; he
neither knew nor wished to know her
whereabouts ; she had passed beyond the
pale of his conjecture even. There I
resolved to leave her. And when, I said
farewell to him and Rome a few days
afterward, nothing had occurred to shake
my resolution.
At the moment of departure, as a mat-
ter of course, I had tossed a soldo into
the Fountain of Trevi to insure my re-
turn ; but with small faith in this travel-
er's charm, which, indeed, failed to work
for many a day. Ten years and more
elapsed. Then, through a happy whirl
of Fortune's wheel, I found myself in
Rome once more, with a whole month —
the month of May — before me. Again,
almost my first thought was of Bianchi.
But, this time, no sudden stroke of good
luck conjured him up. I had kept his
old address, and wrote to him there, re-
ceiving no answer. I watched for him
in the Corso, inspected cabstands, ques-
tioned porters, without result. At men-
tion of his name all shook their heads.
And, finally, I dropped the matter.
A Sunday came which was to be my
last in Rome. As I returned on foot
from St. Peter's,in the afternoon, through
the Via Condotti, the declining sunlight
shone full upon the distant church of
Santa Trinita de' Monti rising above the
vista of the Spanish Steps against a clear
blue sky. I remembered opportunely
that this was the hour for the fine choral
service there, at which, on Sunday, the
nuns of the adjoining convent assisted.
318
A Roman Cabman.
Hurrying on, I was still in time for a
portion of the office ; and pushing aside
the leathern curtain, I went in.
The dim nave was crowded to the in-
tersecting grate which defends the nuns
and their sanctuary from the world.
Through the bars, afar off, gleamed the
candles of the altar, the vestments, the
swinging censers ; the unseen choir sang,
the organ boomed, the smoke curled up-
ward in the encroaching darkness. I
listened to the music, idly watching the
beam of daylight that stretched across
the nearer pavement when the curtain
swung inward. Suddenly, revealed for
the moment in its glow, stood the fig-
ure of an elderly man, shabbily dressed,
broken with years and with illness too,
perhaps, for his gait was uncertain. He
limped forward into the shadow, and be-
came immediately absorbed in his devo-
tions. The picturesqueness of the man
and his reverent attitude interested me,
and I studied his face, which now was
but just discernible. " He is a little like
Bianchi," I thought; "though much
older." Then, remembering that I had
not seen my former friend for ten years,
I began to wonder whether it could be
he. " No, impossible ! " I soon decided ;
yet I drew toward him for a better and
more searching look. Just then, in the
distance, came the elevation of the host,
and the man knelt slowly and painfully.
Turning his head for an instant, he caught
my eye, but with no light of recognition.
"It is not he ! " I sighed.
None the less, when, a few moments
later, the man rose, and, after dusting
his knees carefully, moved toward the
door, I followed him out, down the steps
at his own slow pace, keeping close be-
hind him. As he reached the Piazza, he
turned with an air of mild surprise. " Is
your name Bianchi Andrea? " I asked.
At the sound of my voice he started,
flashed upon me the old sparkling look,
and knew me instantly. " Dio mio, Dio
mio, Dio mio / " he chattered, like a par-
rot ; " what a combination, what a com-
bination, caro signore! To think you
should be there in the church ! It was
the Madonna that led me to it ! "
" Bianchi ! It is really you ! Still at
your old trade ! "
" Of course ! " he laughed, limping
toward the vettura, which stood near by.
" See ! Here is my horse. Alas, no
longer the Moor ! But what a combina-
tion ! Dio mio, Dio mio, Dio mio ! "
" You have been ill ? You are lame."
"Naturally, since I am old. It is no-
thing. My health is not so bad."
" And your wife ? She is well, too ? "
"Ah, signor mio! She is dead, —
dead these two years. Yet I am not
alone ; the boy is with me, and " —
At that moment we were interrupted
by the vetturino's fare for the time being,
— two elderly women, severe in aspect,
evidently English and single. They had
followed from the church, and now eyed
us with impatient wonder. I could do
no more than give Bianchi my address,
bidding him come to me on the morrow.
He clambered to the box and drove off;
while I, left alone, slowly recovered from
my astonishment at this happy chance
which ha4 reestablished the old relation-
ship,— with the Madonna's help, as I,
too, was half inclined to believe.
We made the most of the two days
left me, with many a blessing for the be-
lated favor. When the end drew near,
I told him that I must see his grandson
before going away, and begged him to
drive at once to his lodging. It was not
the old place, but a brighter and better
one in a new quarter. My visit had been
timed for the breakfast hour, when the
youth, who was a laborer, would not fail
to be at home. In a few moments he ap-
peared, stalwart and unabashed, — a tall,
manly fellow, who looked as if, upon oc-
casion, he might prove as valiant as his
namesake, the Trojan hero. While we
talked together, a voice summoned him,
and he excused himself. The meal was
ready, he had a sharp appetite. " Con
permesso ! " And he went out;
Dead Out of Doors.
319
His keen, black eyes recalled others,
still unforgotten, that I ana not likely to
forget. Upon my lips trembled a ques-
tion, which I had been often tempted to
ask during the previous forty-eight hours.
Yet the subject was one that I wished to
make Bianchi, himself, introduce, if that
could be accomplished. He may have
read my thought ; for while he shifted
his position uneasily, his eyes avoided
mine. " Let us go ! " I said ; and he
sprang eagerly toward the door ; but at
the sound of a step on the landing out-
side, he drew back, as a woman stood
before him in the doorway. Pale, worn,
wasted by disease, in dress of the hum-
blest sort, she would have been unrecog-
nizable but for the eyes, which, shining
with what now seemed unnatural bright-
ness, betrayed her identity even through
the transforming mask of years. She re-
coiled at sight of us ; then with a mur-
mured apology for her intrusion, shuffled
hastily away. An inner door closed be-
hind her. And when all was quiet, Bi-
anchi silently led the way out. Not until
we were in the open air did he meet
my inquiring glance. Then there was
no need of further question. At once he
told me the little there was to tell, readily
and volubly.
After that chance encounter in the
Villa Borghese, his daughter did not
cross his path again, and he heard no-
thing of her for a long time. All trace
seemed lost forever. But his wife upon
her death-bed, convinced that the daugh-
ter was still alive, had exacted from him
a promise that if any appeal should be
made, he would hearken to it. His wife
died and was buried. Then, three months
later, word came that his daughter had
returned to Rome ill, if not dying, and
in want. He had kept his promise faith-
fully, going to her relief, cancelling all
the past, and bringing her home to die,
as he believed. She was there ; she had
recovered, in a measure ; but there was
no harm in her now, as one might see at
a glance. She devoted herself to her boy,
to him, to her mother's memory. Oil,
an angel of devotion ! What would the
signore have ? It had been a sad story,
but it was well over. In this world, one
must be a good father, or one was nothing.
Upon that word we parted company.
And it is the last woi-d of his that I re-
member. Our leave-taking of the next
morning at the station, hurried and for-
mal as it was, slips wholly from my re-
collection. The honest-hearted fellow
turned back into the Roman streets, where
still, perhaps, grown older and grayer,
he pursues his calling. If so, at church,
or Corso, or piazza, with the Madonna's
help, we shall surely meet again. If
not: —
" Atque in perpetuum, frater, ave atque vale ! "
T. R. Sullivan.
DEAD OUT OF DOORS.
HIGH from the ground, and blown upon by air
Sun-sanctified ; caught from corruption's mould,
Girdled by streams amidst the foot-hills fair,
With wind-chants making music sweet and old,
This red man rests. Unto the elements
He doth return ; his soul soars glad and free,
And e'en his body seems, in going hence,
To cry, " O grave, where is thy victory ! "
Richard Burton.
320
Prescott the Man.
PRESCOTT THE MAN.
GEORGE HILLAKD, writing to Prescott
in January, 1844, spoke of " that warm
heart of yours which makes those who
have the privilege of being your friends
entirely forget that you are a great his-
torian, and only think of you as a person
to be loved."
Subsequent forgetting has been of a
different kind. For most of us, the his-
torian has swallowed the man. We think
of Prescott in his study, though for but
few of us, even there, do his twenty
pairs of old shoes piled on a step-ladder
cause the face of Clio to relax ; but we
scarcely realize him at all in the nursery.
That boon companion of children ; that
rich and spontaneous nature ; that most
charming of hosts and most welcome of
guests ; that devoted son, that fond fa-
ther, that sportively benignant grandfa-
ther ; that loyal friend, good citizen,
helper of the poor ; that man in whom
gentleness dwelt with strength, and whom
kindness clothed as with a garment, —
very human, withal, and not exempt from
laughable weaknesses and engagingly
whimsical traits, — the winning person-
ality has been too much lost in the stately
historical writer.
This is due partly to the inevitable
fading of personal tradition with the
lapse of time. Those who knew Pres-
cott in his radiant youth and sunny man-
hood are gone. In his family the mem-
ory of the authentic man survives, but
for the world at large there remains only
the written record. That, so far as the
histories are concerned, necessarily yields
but a feeble light upon the man behind
the book. An author may unlock his
heart in a sonnet, but certainly cannot
in a history of dead centuries. And
even in Prescott's formal biography his
real personality is somewhat elusive.
Ticknor was Prescott's lifelong friend,
and a most painstaking biographer. He
had ample material, and used it conscien-
tiously, — it is not necessary to say dis-
creetly, for not a line that Prescott wrote
needed to be suppressed for fear of hurt-
ing the feelings of the living or of the
friends of the dead. But Ticknor was
an old man when he wrote the Life.
His own view of society and of literature,
always severe, had deepened into some-
thing like austerity ; and for him to have
brought out vividly the playful, jocose,
and warmly human aspects of Prescott's
character would doubtless have seemed
to him very much like taking liberties
with the Muse of History. At any rate,
the awful dignity of historical composi-
tion, and the weighty responsibilities go-
ing with life in that " pale of society "
where Ticknor drew his well-regulated
breath, are the main personal impressions
which one derives to-day from the official
biography of Prescott. The rest is there,
no doubt, by implication, and f ugitively.
Prescott's social charm is asserted, though
without detail; his light-heartedness at
home, his vivacious wit in conversation,
his grace of manner, his innocent fond-
ness for the good things of life, — all are
affirmed by Ticknor, but in a slighting
way which prevents these qualities from
taking the place which they ought to have
in the picture of the total man. Over a
great mass of material in Prescott's jour-
nals and letters, illustrating the true na-
ture of the historian in habit as he was,
Ticknor passed too hastily.
Prescott was not only well born but
happily born. His heredity was nicely
fitted to his problem of life. From his
mother, Governor Wolcott thought, he
derived his " unfailing spirits." In
Pierce's Life of Sumner there is record
of a conversation at dinner, where Web-
ster, Ticknor, Sumner, and Prescott were
present, among others. The talk turned
on the question what most vitally shaped
Prescott the Man.
321
men's characters and activities. Some
said one thing, some another. "Mr.
Prescott declared that a mother's influ-
ence was the most potent." He was a
living witness. All the accounts which
Ticknor piously gathered from Salem
contemporaries agree that the boy Wil-
liam had his bright vivacity from his
mother. "I am the only classmate of
Mr. Prescott now present," said Presi-
dent Walker of Harvard, at the memorial
meeting held in honor of the dead his-
torian by the Massachusetts Historical
Society on February 1, 1859. " My re-
collections of him go back to our college
days when he stood among us one of the
most joyous and light-hearted." He had
need to be. An accident, in his junior
year, destroyed the sight of his left eye,
and later was followed by an obscure
disease in the other which brought him
to the verge of total blindness. From
fear of the latter he was never exempt
while he lived. Nothing but an indom-
itable gayety of spirit could have carried
him through those early years of almost
absolute darkness and the lifelong crip-
pling, and left him the serene and happy
nature his friends always found him.
He was, in fact, obstinately and unrea-
sonably cheerful. At his grandfather's
house in the Azores, a lad of nineteen,
he was for three months shut up in a
dark room and kept on a reducing diet.
Yet his spirits were throughout unflag-
ging. He was not merely not despondent,
he was positively hilarious. He sang and
spouted poetry, and mouthed Latin, and
walked hundreds of miles within the four
walls of his large chamber, — from cor-
ner to corner, thrusting out his elbows to
keep himself from running, in the dark,
against the sharp angles. Indeed, as he
wrote to his parents, he " emerged " from
his "dungeon, not with the emaciated
figure of a prisoner, but in the full bloom
of a bon vivant." A little later, in Lon-
don, he was told by the leading oculist
whom he consulted that there was no
hope of a permanent cure of his affection
VOL. xcni. — NO. 557. 21
of the eye, and that, as he wrote home,
" I must abandon my profession for-
ever." But even that could not daunt
him, and he added, " Do not think that
I feel any despondency. . . . My spirits
are full as high as my pulse ; fifteen de-
grees above the proper temperament."
As one proof more of Prescott's un-
conquerable temper and light-heartedness
that never failed, may be cited what his
mother said, years after, to her pastor :
" This is the very room where William
was shut up for so many months in utter
darkness. In all that trying season, when
so much had to be endured, and our
hearts were ready to fail for fear, I never
in a single instance groped my way across
the apartment to take my place at his
side that he did not salute me with some
hearty expression of good cheer, — as if
we were the patients, and it was his place
to comfort us."
Prescott was known as "the blind
historian ; " and the tradition that he
was totally blind became early fixed and
almost impossible to dislodge. Maria
Edgeworth sighed over the " poor man,"
on the supposition that he was entirely
without sight. The Edinburgh Review,
in its notice of the Conquest of Mexico,
spoke of the writer as having " been blind
several years." " The next thing," wrote
Prescott in his journal, " I shall hear of
a subscription set on foot for the blind
Yankee author." At about the same
time he wrote to Colonel Aspinwall, " I
can t say I like to be called blind. I
have, it is true, but one eye ; but that
has done me some service, and, with fair
usage will, I trust, do me some more."
But in spite of all his explanations the
world went on believing that Prescott
was, as he humorously protested that he
was not, " high-gravel blind." Edward
Everett wrote him from London, June 2,
1845 : " I noticed the note in the Edin-
burgh Review [this was a correction of
the earlier mistake] about your blindness,
and I continually hear and as often con-
tradict the same statement in conversa-
322
Prescott the Man.
tion, but I do not always command belief.
Sir John Hobhouse last Saturday even-
ing insisted upon it you were as blind as
a mole, and being a quiet man, I was
obliged to let him have his own way."
The truth is that Prescott always had
precarious vision in one eye, which he
was able to use only with extreme caution
and for but short periods at a time ; and
even so, frequent intervals of complete
blindness fell upon him with the recur-
rence of his disease. The oculists of the
day assured him of the sufficiency of his
one feeble eye for all the ordinary pur-
poses of life, provided he would give up
his literary labors. But he quietly re-
fused to pay the price. Holding himself
to a rigid regimen, carefully observing
every precaution that his own experience
or the skill of physicians could suggest,
he yet preferred the joys of his intellec-
tual pursuits to the certainty of eyesight.
Again and again in his journals we find
him calmly contemplating the possibil-
ity of absolute and permanent blindness.
Even then there is no expression of re-
gret or slackened resolution ; only a
weighing of the possibility of his being
able to press on with his work when
wholly dependent upon the eyes of others.
" The obstacles," he wrote in 1830, " I
do not believe to be insuperable, unless
I become deaf as well as blind." As to
the actual extent and effect of his disable-
ment, a few of his own private records
are worth pages of description : —
January 16, 1831. " I can dispense
entirely with my own eyes."
June 26, 1836. " The discourage-
ments under which I have labored have
nearly determined me more than once
to abandon the enterprise. I met with
a remark of Dr. Johnson on Milton at
an early period, stating that the poet
. gave up his history of Britain, on be-
coming blind, since no one could pursue
such investigations under such disadvan-
tages. This remark of the great doctor
confirmed me in the resolution to attempt
the contrary. ... I must not overstate
the case, however, for certainly my eyes
have not been high-gravel blind all the
while."
March 24, 1846. " The last fortnight
I have not read or written, in all, five
minutes. . . . My notes have been writ-
ten by ear-work : snail-like progress."
November 1, 1846. "I reckon time
by eyesight, as distances are now reck-
oned by railroads. There is about the
same relative value of the two, in regard
to speed."
July 9, 1848. " I use my eyes ten
minutes at a time, for an hour a day. So
I snail it along."
February 15, 1849. "How can I
feel enthusiasm when limping like a blind
beggar on foot ? I must make my brains
— somehow or other — save my eyes."
July 15, 1849. " Worked about three
hours per diem, of which with my own
eyes (grown very dim, alas !) about 30
minutes a day."
October 3, 1853. " Have been quack-
ing again for my eye."
It was not really quacking, though
Prescott suffered many things of many
physicians. His case seemed to be pre-
figured in Voltaire's Zadig. The great
impostor Hermes, in whose person the
whole faculty was satirized, declared, " If
it had been the right eye I could have
cured it, but the wounds of the left are
incurable."
One entry more from the journals : —
June 16, 1857. " I fight as — meta-
phorically speaking — Cervantes fought
at Lepanto — with one hand crippled."
For more than thirty years Prescott
employed private secretaries. They read
to him, made notes for him, and, hardest
task of all, deciphered and transcribed
his own blind man's writing, — his noc-
tographs. In the latter form nearly all
his composing was done. He himself
described the writing contrivance. The
apparatus, he wrote in a letter to the
publisher of the Homes of American
Authors, consisted of " a frame of the
size of a common sheet of letter-paper,
Prescott the Man.
323
with brass wires inserted in it to corre-
spond with the number of lines wanted.
On one side of this frame is pasted a leaf
of thin carbonated paper, such as is used
to obtain duplicates. Instead of a pen,
the writer makes use of a stylus, of ivory
or agate, the latter better or harder.
The great difficulties in the way of a
blind man's writing in the usual manner
arise from his not knowing when the ink
is exhausted in his pen, and when his
lines run into one another. Both these
difficulties are obviated by this simple
writing case, which enables one to do his
work as well in the dark as in the light."
It is a fact, however, that one difficulty
remained. Prescott sometimes forgot to
insert the sheet of paper, and then, as
he once wrote, he would proceed for a
page " in all the glow of composition "
before finding that all had been in vain.
With characteristic good nature, he al-
luded to this occasional contretemps as
one of the " whimsical distresses " of his
method. Of the resulting manuscript,
let one of his secretaries speak. Mr.
Robert Carter, who was engaged by
Prescott in 1847, had assigned him as
his first duty the task of familiarizing
himself with the noctograph writing. " I
was appalled," he wrote afterwards, " by
its appearance. It was nearly as illegi-
ble as so much shorthand. I could not
make out the first line, or even the first
word." This is fully confirmed by what
Prescott wrote to R. W. Griswold in
1845. He said that the characters of his
noctographs " might indeed pass for hie-
roglyphics." His secretaries managed
to interpret them, but " sometimes my
hair stood on end at the woeful blun-
ders and misconceptions of the original
which every now and then found their
way into the first proof of the printer."
It may be added "that the noctograph
original of this very letter to Griswold
is preserved among the Prescott papers,
and is itself a fine example of his most
inscrutable writing. The resource of
dictation was distasteful to Prescott. He
did, indeed, dictate his short memoir of
Pickering, but his secretary states that
he " did not like the method, and never
again resorted to it when writing for the
public." Prescott's own account of the
matter is as follows : " Thierry, who is
totally blind, urged me by all means to
cultivate the habit of dictation, to which
he had resorted ; and James, the eminent
novelist, who has adopted his habit, finds
it favorable to facility in composition.
But I am too long accustomed to my own
way to change. And, to say truth, I
never dictated a sentence in my life for
publication without its falling so flat on
my ear that I felt almost ashamed to send
it to the press. I suppose it is habit."
The outward effects of Prescott's par-
tial blindness were not so important as
its influence in shaping and making
beautiful his character. No one can read
the remarkable record in his journals of
the way in which he turned from a dim
world without to a radiant world within,
took himself in hand, and forged labori-
ously in the dark the tempered weapon
of his mind and heart, without becoming
persuaded that his strength was plucked
from his very disabling. It was this view
of the matter which led the Rev. N. L.
Frothingham to say of him after his
death that the mischance which robbed
him of eyesight could " hardly be called
a calamity, so manfully, so sweetly, so
wondrously did he, not only endure it,
but convert it to the highest purposes
of a faithful, scholarly, serviceable life."
On Prescott's tomb, as on that of another
gentle scholar and intrepid invalid of
New England, might have been written,
" Meine Trtibsal war mein Glttck."
The making of the man lies open to
us in Prescott's letters and especially in
his journals. Never was there a sharper
reminder of the physical basis of life ;
never, also, a more reassuring proof that,
after all, it is the soul which doth the
body make. In Prescott's case, the
process clearly began with the physical.
His bodily crippling gave him an intro-
324
Prescott the Man.
spective habit. He watched himself like
an experimenter. Every symptom he
noted down. His diet he scrupulously
recorded for many months. His parti-
tion of the day, — his hours of sleep ; the
time given to reading ; the amount of
exercise and recreation, with the effects
of each ; social amusements and the tax
paid to friendship, — all was written out
and studied and commented upon through
several rigorous years. It was not done
selfishly, least of all morbidly. Prescott
had a problem to solve. How could he
do the work of a man without a man's
eyesight? It was to answer that ques-
tion that he undertook his prolonged self-
scrutiny and self-testing. He did it with
almost scientific objectivity. He was as
cool and unbiased as if writing of an-
other. Not one hint of a diseased con-
sciousness appears in the whole record,
which thus stands unparalleled, I think,
in the literature of diaries. To put one's
nature, physical and mental, under the
microscope daily, yet to betray, not
simply no morbid feeling, but almost no
sense of self at all ; to be calm, even
jocose, while recording ill health and
noting limitations ; to preserve a cheer-
ful temper while wrestling with the prob-
lem how to make his life bear fruit in
darkness ; and to do all this in a series of
records meant only for his own eye and
his own guidance, — such was the high
and unique achievement of Prescott.
Brought up in what was, for those
times, luxury, Prescott had certain temp-
tations of the palate. In his early trav-
els he carefully noted, and sampled, the
confectionery of the various countries
he visited. Until within a few years, a
Boston druggist was living who used to
supply him regularly with licorice-root,
— that child's dainty of a ruder age !
It was used by the historian as a means
of ingratiating himself with children.
His grandchildren recall the little packets
of licorice-root, and other sweets, which
he always had ready for them
While still a young man in Europe,
he began mortifying the flesh. A Paris
physician bade him never exceed two
glasses of wine per diem. The story of
a traveling companion was that Prescott
at once seized upon the largest wine-
glasses on the table, to measure by.
However that may have been, we have
in his own handwriting a register of his
daily wine-drinking for a period of two
years and nine months. It was no cal-
endar of a sybarite. The effect on his
eye was the one standard to which every-
thing was referred. Thus when we find
him writing, July 22, 1820, " Went to
Nahant — drank too much wine in Bos-
ton," — we know that he simply meant
too much for his eye. Wine was pre-
scribed for him ; he found it useful ; the
only thing required was to work out a rule
as to kind and quantity, and this he did
with an amazing sort of impersonal zeal.
And every other act or experience of his
daily life was interrogated in the same
spirit and to the same end. After months
of minute inspection and full experiment,
aiming at the correct regimen, he wrote
down the* following : —
" Eat jneat ; light breakfasts ; temper-
ate dinners ; light teas ; no suppers ; sim-
ple food ; no great variety at dinner ;
exercise = 4 miles pr. day at 3 or 4 dif-
ferent times ; light not intense, but full,
clear ; no spirits ; no wine except excel-
lent and old ; not exceed 4 glasses of that,
nor oftener than once in 5 days ; read
moderately large print, when eye is well ;
not walk in the cold or wind ; no wine
when I have a cold ; no goggles ? not sit
up late."
Other kindred entries in his joui
are : —
January, 1820. " N. B. Theatre, late
Balls, smoking, supper parties, alwaj
pernicious — ergo, not go — or not stay
late."
" Rule about balls. Not more than
one a week, and not stay after 11 or more
than 2£ h."
" Club, not stay after 12."
It is easy to understand, from the fore-
Prescott the Man.
325
going, how one of Prescott's intimate
friends could speak of a certain " stoical "
basis in a life of which the outward man-
ner was only ease and smiling amiability.
This man, all rippling with grace and
good nature, who, as Professor Parsons
said of him, " could be happy in more
ways, and more happy in every one of
them, than any other person I have ever
known," had the power of gripping him-
self silently and in secret, and making
himself lord of his own fate. Yet he was
no methodarian. His rules were aids,
not fetters. Even his dietary was not in-
flexible. " How can you eat that, Wil-
liam ? " his wife would sometimes call out
at table, seeing him wander into forbid-
den dishes. He would laugh away the
warning, and affirm that the only way
he knew he had rules of eating was by
occasionally breaking them. During his
English trip in 1850, he stood up nobly
for the honor of his country's digestion,
and was a valiant trencherman at the
endless breakfasts and dinners to which
he was invited. Sydney Smith had sent
word to him in advance that, if he visited
London, he would be drowned in claret or
turtle soup. " I believe I can swim in
those seas," wrote Prescott in his journal.
His wonderful social charm was instant-
ly recognized by the best English society.
He was as much sought after there as he
always was in Boston and New York.
" If I were asked," said Theophilus Par-
sons, "to name the man, whom I have
known, whose coming was most sure to
be hailed as a pleasant event by all whom
he approached, I should not only place
Prescott at the head of the list, but I
could not place any other man near him."
It was not that he was a professional
diner-out, still less that even more porten-
tous person, the professional teller of sto-
ries and retailer of smart sayings. Pres-
cott used to make horrible puns, but his
social manner had its immense attrac-
tion mainly through unfailing kindness,
unerring sympathy, and vivacious good
spirits which nothing could depress. It
was his simplicity and spontaneity which
delighted everybody.
Mr. G. T. Curtis, writing to Mr. Hil-
lard, says : " Prescott, the historian, not
yet an author, was at that time in the full
flush of his early manhood, running over
with animal spirits, which his studies and
self-discipline could not quench ; talking
with a joyous abandon, laughing at his
own inconsequences, recovering himself
gayly, and going on again in a graver
strain which soon gave way to some new
joke or brilliant sally. Wherever he
came there was always a ' fillip ' to the
discourse, be it of books or society, or
reminiscences of foreign travel, or the
news of the day."
Sometimes this unstudied impulsive-
ness of his betrayed him into an un-
conscious malapropos. " What have I
said ? " he would cry out when he saw
his wife, who kept a dutiful watch upon
these lapses of his, looking at him se-
verely. Naturally, such a fresh naivete^
would but lay additional stress upon his
original unlucky remark. Once a titled
Englishwoman was arguing with him in
his own home on the subject of Ameri-
canisms. She objected strongly to our
use of the word " snarl " in the sense
of confusion. " Why, surely," spoke up
Prescott in all innocence, " you would say
that your ladyship's hair is in a snarl?"
As such unfortunately was the case at
the time — it was the era of plastered
hair — the visitor had to cool her wrath
by remembering that her host was blind.
Samuel Eliot describes the home life
of Prescott at his country place in Pep-
perell. Here he passed the happiest part
of his existence. Work went on as usual,
but did not seem to be his principal in-
terest. This lay in " the enjoyment of
the family and the friends forming a por-
tion of the family ; the drive or the walk ;
the gay dinner ; the evening with read-
ings, but oftener and more delightfully
with games and songs." One game in
particular was an especial favorite with
Prescott. It was called Albano, because
326
Prescott the Man.
introduced by some young friends of his
who had played it in Rome. It was
really only a variant of Puss in the Cor-
ner. The players chose geographical
names from the four quarters of the
globe ; but the one that Prescott took,
and which was never shouted without
provoking tumultuous outbursts of glee,
was Nessitisset. It was the name of the
stream flowing by his farm. Eliot also
tells of a comic dispute which once oc-
curred at Pepperell between Prescott and
his uncle, Isaac Davis. The old gentle-
man complained of growing deaf, but
Prescott maintained that his uncle's hear-
ing was as good as his own. To test it,
he had his wife hang an old-fashioned
watch at the end of the room, and the
two men advanced slowly toward it to
determine which could first hear the tick-
ing. " Do you hear it, Davis ? " " No."
" Neither do I." So on, step by step,
until in amazement Prescott put his ear
actually to the timepiece. " Susan !
the thing isn't going!" he cried to the
sly woman who had stopped it. This
boyish spirit and welling gayety Prescott
carried into his work as well as his social
relaxation. One of his secretaries wrote
that whenever he came to describe some
stirring scene, like a battle, he would hu-
morously key himself up to it by bursting
into song. One favorite was a ballad
beginning, " 0, give me but my Arab
steed ! " He was fond of music. Senti-
mental songs would sometimes set him
weeping. " They are only my opera
tears," he would explain. This was one
sign of that " simplicity in which noble-
ness of nature most largely shares," to
quote the words of Thucydides which
Professor Felton applied to Prescott after
his death. Such tributes could be multi-
plied. " One of the most frank, amiable,
warm-hearted and open-hearted of human
beings," wrote Hillard ; and added, " Of
all men I have known he was the most
generally beloved, the most universal so-
cial favorite." It might be said of Pres-
cott, as Sydney Smith said of Mackintosh,
that " the gall-bladder was omitted in his
composition." " Not a single unkind or
harsh or sneering expression," testifies
one of his secretaries, " could be found in
any of the hundreds of letters I wrote at
his dictation." The same may be said
of his private journals. Not a line of
them needs to be blotted. This man had
that even sweetness of temper and ex-
haustless benevolence which can stand the
searching test of impressions made upon
children and servants. Prescott was not
a hero to his valet, but he was sometliing
better, — a man to win undying respect
and love. All his private secretaries left
his service with regret, and ever retained
for him the most affectionate regard.
Prescott's self-discipline was applie
as rigorously to his moral as to his physi-
cal or mental nature. His habit was
keep by him a complete inventory of his
moral qualities, — chiefly a list of the
faults which he set himself to strive to
correct. Slips written by his own hand,
and seen by his eye alone, he kept in a
large envelope, each one containing a rec-
ord of something he had found amiss in
himself. * Over this card-catalogue of fail-
ings he would periodically go, — usually
on a Sunday morning after church, — •
and conscientiously check up his moral
account. One besetting defect mastered,
its record would be blotted out ; a new
weakness detected, it would have its
scrupulous entry. To the last he kept
up this recurring self-examination, and
after his death the envelope was found,
marked, " To be burnt." To ashes the
whole was reduced. Not enough to make
a moment's blaze, — the sum of the faults
of one so universally loved. " The only
man," wrote Hillard, " whom we never
heard any one speak against."
In the early journals there are some
traces of the struggle of Prescott's spirit
to find itself.
" Since the age of 23, the most wretch-
ed period of my life was when my pas-
sions and temper controlled me, the most
happy when I controlled them"
Prescott the Man.
327
" Without answering for others, I may
say that these qualities of mind are suffi-
cient for my happiness : —
" I. Good Nature. II. Manliness.
III. Independence. IV. Industry. V.
Honesty. VI. Cheerful Views. VII.
Religious Confidence."
On one occasion, as if bursting into a
" let us hear the conclusion of the whole
matter," he wrote : —
Voila.
P. S. I have been perfectly contented,
light-hearted and happy, ye last two
weeks — with my BOOKS 7 hrs. & DO-
MESTIC SOCIETY — & Benev* Feels (Not
thinking of it) Not VANITY
Prescott's athletic training of mind
and pen for the task he set himself can
be but barely alluded to here. He knew
to the full " what belonged to a scholar ;
what pains, what toil, what travail, con-
duct to perfection." The records of his
rigid discipline from his twenty -sixth
to his fortieth year remain as proof of
what would otherwise seem, considering
his handicap, the incredible amount of
work he got through. With the certain
prospect of indifferent health and depen-
dence upon the eyes of another, he yet
attacked light-heartedly a mass of read-
ing which would have taxed the rudest
physique. His toils were undertaken,
moreover, through no necessity, — except
the spur of a noble mind, — since his
father's ample means assured him com-
fort and even luxury. Yet we find him,
while still only feeling after his life-oc-
cupation, sitting down in 1822 to the fol-
lowing self-imposed task : " I am now,"
he wrote in his journal, " twenty-six
years of age, nearly. By the time I am
thirty, God willing, I propose, with what
stock I have already on hand, to be a
very well-read English scholar ; to be
acquainted with the classical and use-
ful authors, prose and poetry, in Latin,
French, and Italian, and especially in
history ; I do not mean a critical or pro-
found acquaintance. The two following
years, 31-32, I may hope to learn Ger-
man, and to read the classical German
writers ; and the translations, if my eye
continues weak, of the Greek. And this
is enough for general discipline." For
German he had later to offer Spanish as
a substitute ; his dim eye and the aid of
his secretary having proven, greatly to
his disappointment, inadequate to mas-
tering the tongue of the learned. All
told, however, in those acquisitive years,
almost without the knowledge of his
most intimate friends or even of his own
family, he put an immense amount of
material behind him. The record of it
remains, — not simply a bare catalogue
of books, but analyses and criticisms,
often very full and always careful ; for,
as he wrote in describing his own method
and purpose, it was obvious to him that
" superficial considerations are not worth
recording, as the recollection of them can
in no way add to the solid stores of
knowledge."
To his reading, and especially to his
writing, Prescott held himself faithfully,
and constantly reinforced his resolution
by admonitory entries in his journal.
One amusing resort of his to flog him-
self along was his habit of imposing for-
feits upon a failure to complete a given
task by a day fixed. This contrivance
he appears to have taken up while still
in college. Very early in his journals
we find traces of the custom. Thus one
of his " Maxims of Composition," writ-
ten down almost at the beginning, reads :
" Pay a forfeit if you read a word as
you are writing it — if you look over
the last 3 lines you have written, except
it be impossible, after trying, to recollect
them (you may at last 3 words), if you
review any except 2 pages when I begin
to write in the day ... I may read
what has been written on the same day
in which I take this liberty, provided it
shall be absolutely necessary to write
further" Later, he transmuted his sys-'
tern of forfeits into a plan of making
wagers (the odds heavily against him-
self) with his private secretaries. A
328
Prescott the Man.
memorandum of one of them survives,
and runs as follows : —
" June <ith 1846. This memorandum
is to witness that a bet of one dollar
to fifty dollars has been made between
E. B. Otis and Wm. H. Prescott Esq.,
the latter betting fifty dollars that he
will read for, compose and write one
hundred pages of his History of Peru in
a hundred days, the days to be counted
from the fourth day of June, 1846, in-
clusive, making due allowance for the ex-
cepted days hereinafter specified.
" This bet shall be renewed at the end
of the hundred days (the amount, con-
ditions, and exceptions of the second bet
being the same in every particular with
those herein recited ;) unless Mr. Pres-
cott shall, within two days from the
expiration of the first period of a hun-
dred days, enter on this memorandum
a written statement of his desire to dis-
solve the Bet. If the History, including
the Postscripts, should not hold out, but
should fall short of the second hun-
dred pages, the wager shall be con-
strued pro rata, that is, Mr. Prescott
shall lose his second bet of fifty dollars
unless he finishes the remainder of his
History at the rate of a page a day,
(reckoning the days from the expiration
of the first hundred days) for every day
after the determination of the first wager
till the work is finished, with the follow-
ing exceptions.
" The days to be excepted when calcu-
lating the result of either bet are these,
viz. : When Mr. Prescott is absent from
town for a day or more, also a day be-
fore and after return, also two days
must be allowed for moving to Nahant,
to Boston and to Pepperell — each ; or
when prevented from study by the sick-
ness of himself or friends for a day or
more, or by the occurrence of any unfore-
seen event (to be determined himself)
that might occupy him otherwise, also
the days employed in writing the Me-
moir of Mr. Pickering; (Writing letters
is not an unforeseen event ; ) also the
days that gentlemen visitors stay in the
house with Mr. Prescott. No days shall
be excepted but those herein specified,
and entered on this sheet.
" Weakness of the eyes shall not count
as illness unless upon such days as Mr.
Prescott cannot read himself 2 hours
and has not his secretary with him, or
the latter, (when Mr. Prescott is unable
to read said two hours — ) from any
cause is unable to read 3 hours on any
day when Mr. Prescott is not employed
in composing text of a chapter and ex-
cept working (not reading) causes pain.
" If working exclusive of reading causes
pain for several days Mr. Prescott has
a right to dissolve this agreement.
" Signed June 4th.
WM. H. PRESCOTT.
EDMUND B. OTIS.
" I promise on my honor as a gentle-
man not to release Mr. Prescott from
any forfeiture that he may incur by this
Engagement except in such cases as are
provided for in the contract — this con-
tract being made at his desire for his own
accommodation solely.
EDMUND B. OTIS.
" Days excepted June 7-21, 25, 26, 28. July
6-14."
Prescott always took this betting on
his own industry with perfect seriousness.
Sometimes he would radiantly greet his
secretary with, " You have lost ! You
owe me a dollar." And he would exact
payment. Occasionally he would, with
woe-begone countenance, produce and
pay over to the protesting secretary the
twenty or thirty dollars he himself had
lost. It was Prescott's one " oddity,"
remarked a friend. Madame de Se'vigne',
who had a similar habit, called it a sot-
tise. " Je reviens a nos lectures : c'est
sans prejudice de Cle*opatre [a romance
in twelve octavo volumes] que j'ai gage"
d'achever (vous savez comme je soutiens
mes gageures) : je songe quelquefois d'ou
vient la folie que j'ai pour ces sottises-
la."
With his warm social nature, and the
Prescott the Man.
329
constant invitations and increasing duties
as host and as representative of Ameri-
can literature thickening upon him, Pres-
cott often found it difficult to adhere to
hours and plans of work. His friend
Gardiner gave one instance of the way
in which pleasure struggled with his rule
of quitting any company in which he
might be by ten o'clock : —
" Mr. Prescott was the entertainer, at
a restaurateur's, of an invited company
of young men, chiefly of the bon vivant
order. He took that mode sometimes
of giving a return dinner, to avoid intrud-
ing too much on the hospitality of his
father's roof, as well as to put at ease
the sort of company which promised exu-
berant mirth. His dinner hour was set
early ; purposely, no doubt, that all might
be well over in good season. But it
proved to be a prolonged festivity. Un-
der the brilliant auspices of their host,
who was never in higher spirits, the
company became very gay, and not at
all disposed to abridge their gayety, even
after a reasonable number of hours. As
the hour of ten drew near, I noticed that
Prescott was beginning to get a little
fidgety, and to drop some hints, which
no one seemed willing to take, — for no
one present, unless it were myself, was
aware that time was of any more impor-
tance to our host than it was to many
of his guests. Presently, to the general
surprise, the host himself got up abrupt-
ly, and addressed the company nearly as
follows : ' Really, my friends, I am very
sorry to be obliged to tear myself from
you at so very unreasonable an hour;
but you seem to have got your sitting-
breeches on for the night. I left mine
at home, and must go. But I am sure
you will be very soon in no condition to
miss me, — especially as I leave behind
that excellent representative,' — point-
ing to a basket of several yet uncorked
bottles, which stood in a corner. ' Then
you know,' he added, ' you are just as
much at home in this house as I am.
You can call for what you like. Don't
be alarmed, — I mean on my account.
I abandon to you, without reserve, all
my best wine, my credit with the house,
and my reputation to boot. Make free
with them all, I beg of you, — and, if
you don't go home till morning, I wish
you a merry night of it.' With this he
was off, and the Old South clock, hard
by, was heard to strike ten at the in-
stant."
A few extracts from the journals will
further light up this aspect of the histo-
rian : —
November 10, 1839. " Diverted too
much by passing objects — children's re-
citation, talking, etc. Another year ar-
range what hours children may occupy
the library [at Pepperell] — how often
ask questions about their lessons, and al-
low a definite time for them — not to be
exceeded."
January 10, 1841. " I have not been
diligent enough. I chew on my subject
more than enough. If I put my bones
to it, I should do the work better as well
as faster. I will. Or write against time
and a forfeit."
September 10, 1841. " I will be stead-
ily employed, as suits this holy quiet of
the country. ' Rapido si, ma' rapido con
leggi ' — as Tasso says. Work — not
overwork. ... I feel as if the country
should be my chronic residence."
February 6, 1842. " Have not been
super-industrious — on the contrary. I
have got through with Dickens, who
dined with me yesterday — and as the
lions are all done up, I suspect for the
season, I will be true and hearty, almost
exclusive, in my own work — till May 4,
say, my birthday. My daily labor and
my thoughts by night. Eschew company,
especially dining."
September 4, 1842. " Company —
company — company ! It will make me
a misanthrope — and yet there is some-
thing very interesting and instructive in
the conversation of travelers from dis-
tant regions. Last week we had Cal-
deron — just from Mexico — Stephens
330
Prescott the Man.
from Central America and Yucatan,
General Hai-lan from Afghanistan, where
he commanded the native troops for many
years. But what has it all to do with the
conquest of Mexico ? "
September 8, 1842. " I am here [Pep-
perell] 40 miles from all enemies — and
friends, worse than enemies — except a
few dear ones."
November 16, 1842. " I will see if I
can't adopt some rules which shall se-
cure me as much time in town as country."
June 24, 1843. " Nahant ! To-day
I have been settling, clearing the decks
for action. Now if I don't make the
powder and shot fly ! I will be out to
everybody. I will have but one idea.
I will be a free man by September —
first week. I will not invite nor will I
go out to dine, and very rarely have com-
pany — once or twice only — and that
only at Nahant, and not sit long then.
I will answer letters shorthand, and
economize every way, eyes and time.
. . . The very day of this entry a
stranger came to Nahant and, being re-
fused admittance — I being ' out ' — staid
overnight and passed all the evening with
us. He came, he said, to Boston to see
me, so what could I do less ? What then
becomes of the Conquest? ot fjuol. It
is no joke."
September 15, 1844. " Pepperell.
Dragged to town two days since to see
Von Raumer. Neither Von nor Don
shall start me again."
August 15, 1845. " Great doings for
so long a stretch — and would carry me
through more than 1000 pages per an-
num ! . . . — Lucky for the world I am
not starving ! "
December 14, 1845. "Twaddle —
twaddle ! . . . I will make regular heb-
domadal entries of my laziness. I think
I can't stand the repetition of such rec-
ords long. ... I may find some apology
in the demi winter days, and in an influx
of visiting friends in my new quarters —
and be hanged to them — not the quar-
ters, but the friends."
January 11, 1846. " A miracle — I
have kept my resolve thus far and been
industrious three whole days ! Now
meliora spero."
October 1,1855. Pepperell. "I shall
have at least the sense of sweet security
from friends — the worst foes to time."
October 28, 1855. "Boston is not
Pepperell. The first day I dined with
a large party. The second, at the theatre
with Mdlle. Rachel till midnight. This
is not the way they lived at Yuste."
The kindest and most considerate of
men, Prescott inherited much of the en-
ergetic philanthropy of his mother. He
was actively or tacitly interested in many
public charities. Particularly to the
Perkins Institution for the Blind did he
give time and money. " Much occupied
the last ten days with the affairs of the
Blind," is an entry of May 9, 1833, not
without its pathetic suggestion. He had
his private pensioners as well, some of
whom were a legacy, so to speak, from
his lady bountiful mother. One of his
secretaries tells us that he regularly gave
away one tenth of his income. The latter
was figured, in the late forties (of course,
after his father had died) at upwards of
$12,000 a year. For the times, it spelled
luxury. Prescott's methods in alms-
giving were not always, one fears, such
as would commend themselves to the
Charity Organization Society. Here is
a specimen of his minute accounts writ-
ten down after taking a walk : " Apple
2 — newspaper 2 — gloves 1.00 — char-
ity 25." During his stay in London he
employed a valet, one Penn (" a Penn I
will not cut," was his punning description
to his wife), who, he wrote home, would
be " perfectly invaluable if he did not
drink, to which he has an amiable incli-
nation." There is something human in
the addition : " I will let him get drunk
once before I part with him."
Here is as good a place as any to in-
troduce extracts from his English letters
of the summer of 1850, passed over by
Ticknor : —
Prescott the Man.
331
TO MRS. PRESCOTT.
STEAMER NIAGARA, June 3, 1850.
. . . This sea life is even worse than
I thought it was. I had forgotten half
its miseries. I will never trust a man
hereafter who talks complacently of it.
As to Kirk [his private secretary] he has
been actively sick ever since we left
Halifax. For myself, I have had a ba-
sis of nausea that turns my stomach
against everything I usually like. Chew-
ing camomile is my best satisfaction —
almost as bad off as Milton's devils with
their dust apples. . . .
But nothing can redeem the utter
wretchedness of a sea life — and never
will I again put my foot in a steamer,
except for Yankee land, and, if I were
not ashamed, should ree'mbark in the
Saturday Steamer from Liverpool, and
settle the wager in another fortnight. . . .
LONDON, June 7, 1850.
... It was a rich cit's dinner — dull
eno' — and concluded by a clergyman —
a great gun here — making an exposition
of a verse or two of " Revelations " — a
hopeful theme. In the midst of the
lecture a mischievous clock in the room
struck ten — and at once went off with a
waltz, running it off merrily, as if to dis-
tance the preacher. The poor host was
in great alarm — tried in vain to throttle
the imp ; the more he tried, the louder
the tunes it played ; till the good divine
was fairly silenced. Is it not a strange
style of things at a dinner ! But they
tell me here it is not likely I shall meet
with such an experience again.
... — before I reached the great le-
viathan [London] I would have given
something to see a ragged fence or an
old stump, or a bit of rock, or even stone
as big as one's fist — to show that the
herd of men had not been combing Na-
ture's head so vigorously. I felt I was
not in my own dear wild America.
LONDON, June 9, 1850.
... In the latter part of the evening,
as I was talking with the Duchess of
Leeds — one of the Catons (Louisa) who
has grown coarser, with a bad complexion
— a rather striking-looking Jewish cast
of physiognomy, with long love locks, at-
tracted my eye, and she said, " That is
Disraeli ; would you like to know him ? "
" Pray," said he, " are you related to the
great American author — the author of
the Spanish Histories ? " I squeezed his
arm, telling him that I could not answer
for the greatness, but I was the man him-
self ; and though at first he was a little
confused — as one or two near smiled at
the blunder — we had a merry chat. . . .
LONDON, June 11, 1850.
. . . The lunch [with Richard Ford]
was all Spanish ; — Spanish wines —
delicious ; Spanish dishes, which good
breeding forced me to taste, but no power
could force me to eat, for they were hot-
ter than the Inquisition.
LONDON, June 18, 1850.
. . . Lockhart said, when I was intro-
duced to him, " You and the Nepaulese
Ambassador are the lions of London, I
believe." " And the hippopotamus ? " —
I added.
LONDON, June 9, 1850.
. . . He did not come up in costume to
the Nepaul envoy, who is walking about
here at the evening parties with a huge
necklace of rough emeralds, — a scarlet
petticoat well garnished with pearls, and
a head-gear made of the beak of a bird,
six inches high.
LONDON, June 30, 1850.
. . . • — the Prince did me the honor to
say a few words to me. He asked me, of
course, how long I had been here, said he
believed this was not my first visit to the
country, and expressed his satisfaction
that I had now repeated my visit. To all
which I replied with wonderful presence
of mind, " Your Royal Highness does me
honor." I was introduced, by the bye,
at Hallam's, the other day to a gentle-
332
Prescott the Man.
man whom I thought he called Lord
Aberdeen. Hallam in introducing me
made a little flourish about my being al-
ready known, etc., and as I like to give
tit for tat on such occasions, as far as
may be, I said, " And the name of the
person to whom I have the honor of being
introduced is also known wherever the
Anglo-Saxon race is to be found." After-
wards at dinner I observed that this in-
dividual, with whom I had then no fur-
ther talk, seemed very shy whenever I
attempted to address him across the
table. On my asking the lady next me
if this was not Lord Aberdeen she said
it was Lord Harry Vane.
TO MRS. TICKNOR.
LONDON, July 18, 1850.
. . . Lockhart showed us the diary of
Sir Walter. He (Lockhart) had two cop-
ies of it printed for himself. One of them
was destroyed in printing the memoir,
for which he made extracts. One he did
not make because the party was living.
It was this : " We dined at Sam Rogers'.
He told me that it was recommended to
print the Italian on the opposite pages of
Rose's translation of Ariosto, in order the
better to understand the English ! "
TO MR. SUMNER.
LONDON, September 4, 1850.
. . . Just seen old Rogers, for the last
time — Cato the Censor Atticized. He
was in his drawing-room, preparing to go
to Brighton, and says he has humbugged
the world this time. [Rogers had been
desperately ill, but had recovered ; hence
the humbug.]
The mention of Sumner's name sug-
gests not merely a long and stanch
friendship of Prescott's, but the question
of his political sympathies. It was pre-
cisely of him, I believe, that John Quincy
Adams made the remark, " A great his-
torian has neither politics nor religion."
As regards the first, at any rate, Pres-
cott is commonly thought to have been as
colorless in life as he was in his writings.
Ticknor dismisses this aspect of the man
in a cold phrase or two. Nor would it
be just to give the impression that Pres-
cott ever took such keen interest in that
passing pageant of present politics which
makes future history, as did, for example,
Dr. Arnold. Brought up a conservative
Whig, and kept by his physical limita-
tions and chosen pursuits from the hurly-
burly of public affairs, it was only late
in life that he showed signs of being
deeply stirred by the conflicts of politi-
cal doctrine which foreshadowed the civil
war. He admired Sumner, and stood
by him personally and socially when all
blue-blooded Boston turned its very cold
shoulder upon the man whose radicalism,
Ticknor said, had placed him outside
" the pale of society." Apropos of this
early obloquy, Prescott wrote to Sumner
in 1851, reminding him how Judge
Story had suffered from "the bitterness
of party feeling," and adding, "Boston
is worse than New York in this respect."
Yet Sumner understood perfectly that
_ Prescott did not go with him politically.
Writing to Lord Morpeth in 1847, he
said, " Prescott shakes his head because
I have anything to do with the thing
[slavery]. His insensibility to it is a
perfect bathos. This is wrong ; I wish
you would jar him a little on this side."
Yet it was only six years later, when
Sumner made his great speech in the
Senate on the repeal of the Missouri
Compromise, that Prescott wrote, "I
don't see but what all Boston has got
round ; in fact, we must call Sumner the
Massachusetts Senator." Brooks's in-
famous assault on Sumner roused Pres-
cott as no display of the slavery spirit
had before done. " You have escaped
the crown of martyrdom," he wrote to
his friend, " by a narrow chance, and
have got all the honors, which are almost
as dangerous to one's head as a gutta-
percha cane. There are few in old
Massachusetts, I can assure you, who do
not feel that every blow on your cranium
Prescott' the Man,
333
was a blow on them." And when the
Senator returned to receive the homage
of Boston, Prescott and his family waved
a welcome to him, as the procession
passed, from the balcony of their Beacon
Street house. Calling on Sumner the
next day, the historian told him that if
he had known there were to be decora-
tions and inscriptions on the houses, he
should have placed on his these words :
" May 22, 1856.
" Then I, and you, and all of us fell down,
Whilst bloody treason flourish' d over us."
Sumner, on his part, was loyalty itself to
the man with whom, as he testified, his
relations " had for years been of peculiar
intimacy." " This death," he wrote to
Longfellow, when, in France, he heard
of Prescott's end, "touches me much.
Perhaps no man, so much in people's
mouths, was ever the subject of so little
unkindness. Something of that immu-
nity which he enjoyed in life must be re-
ferred to his beautiful nature, in which
enmity could not live." To the widow,
five years later, Sumner wrote, on occa-
sion of the publication of Ticknor's Life
of Prescott : " The past has been revived.
... I have felt keenly how much I was
permitted to enjoy, and how much I have
lost. Those evenings in the darkened
room in Bedford Street, with the kind,
sparkling, intimate talk on books, his-
tory, friends abroad and at home ; the
pleasant suppers below, where were the
venerable parents, so good and cordial ;
then as I became absorbed in public af-
fairs, the constant friendship which we
maintained ; the welcome he always gave
me on my return from Washington ; our
free conversation on public affairs and
public men ', and perhaps more than all
things else his tender sympathy as he sat
by my bedside, revealing how his heart
was moved, only a short time before the
summons came to himself, — all these I
think of, and in selfish sorrow I grieve
that he is gone."
To piece out the account of Prescott's
political associations and gradual change
of view, the testimony of his private sec-
retary, Mr. Robert Carter, may be cited.
Speaking of their first acquaintance
(1847), he wrote, "He was a conserva-
tive Whig as I a Free Soiler." But he
adds, " Ten years later, I had the plea-
sure of knowing that he voted for Fre-
mont for President, and for Burlingame
for Congress, notwithstanding his high
personal esteem for his friend and neigh-
bor, Mr. Appleton, the candidate opposed
to Burlingame." It would be a mistake
to class Prescott among abolitionists, or
even as outspoken against the aggressions
of slavery ; but that his nature did not
fail to thrill under the indignities heaped
upon the free North is made manifest in
a letter which he wrote to an English-
woman in 1854 : —
" We have had most alarming doings
here lately in the fugitive slave line. . . .
A regiment of the militia was called out,
the streets in certain quarters were closed
against passengers, and swords and mus-
kets were flashing in our eyes as if we
had been in a state of siege. I am rather
of the conservative order, you know, but
I assure you it made my blood boil to see
the good town placed under martial law
so unceremoniously for no other purpose
than to send back a runaway negro to his
master. It is a disagreeable business at
any time, and it was only a strong con-
viction of the claims which the South had
on us by virtue of the Constitution, which
made us one nation, that induced our
people to sign the famous Compromise
act of 1850. But the Nebraska Bill
looks to us so much like double dealing
in the matter that there is now a great
apathy in regard to our enforcing our
own part of the contract. Then the thing
was carried here with such a rash hand.
The town was turned over to the military
by the mayor. . . ". Every petty captain
of a militia corps was left to act at his
own discretion. In one case the guns
were leveled to fire on the multitude
without any notice to warn the people of
the danger ; and it was by a mere acci-
334
Prescott the Man.
dent that a bloody fray did not take
place, which, if once begun, would have
put us in mourning for many a day. Old
Boston has rather a relish for rebellion,
and when it lay in the path, as it seemed
to do here, it required some restraining
grace not to pick it up. ... I am told
the government was quite willing we
should dip our fingers in rebellion. It
knows it cannot have any support, and
for that reason would be very glad to put
us in the wrong with the rest of the coun-
try. The Nebraska business has called
up a feeling which, though not Free Soil,
or Abolitionist, is so near akin to them
that they can all work in the same har-
ness."
It is, in truth, in Prescott's English
correspondence that we find the work-
ings of his mind on American politics
most clearly revealed. At one time, he
is enlisting the sympathies and receiving
the contributions of English friends in
behalf of a slave, — presumably a fugi-
tive. At another, he is discussing with
the Duke of Argyll, or with Lord Mor-
peth, the fatal drift of slavery toward the
extinction of human rights. Not im-
mediately upon these themes, but on
others which, after all, were kindred with
them, a couple of unpublished letters are
of interest.
TO MB. B. C. WINTHROP.
May 30, 1847.
. . . Everything has gone well for
you here, no extra session of Congress,
and none like to be. We ride on, con-
quering and to conquer, as you see, up to
the very Halls of Montezuma, and many
I should think from the positive manner
they speak of them expect to find the
palace of the old Aztec still standing.
The Mexicans have missed it in fighting
pitched battles instead of trusting to a
guerilla warfare. My friend General
Miller, who has much experience of the
Spanish- American character, told me that
the guerilla was the only way by which
they could fight us with success ; and if
they pursued that system they would be
invincible. They may trouble us yet in
that way ; but the capital and seaports
seem destined to come into our hands.
But what shall we do with them ? It
will be a heavy drag on our republican
car, and the Creole blood will not mix
well with the Anglo-Saxon. Then there
will be the slavery question as a fire-
brand which will keep you hot enough
next winter in the Capitol.
TO C. GUSHING.
BOSTON, April 3, 1848.
MY DEAR SIB, — I should sooner
have thanked you for your friendly letter
from the environs of Mexico. You are
in a position for an accurate comprehen-
sion of my narrative and the subject of it.
And I shall be very glad if the result does
not lead to the detection of greater inac-
curacies than those you have pointed out.
You have closed a campaign as brilliant
as that of the great conquistador him-
self, though the Spaniards have hardly
maintained the reputation of their hardy
ancestors. The second conquest would
seem a priori to be a matter of as much
difficulty as the first, considering the
higher civilization and military science of
the races who now occupy the country,
but it has not proved so, — and my read-
ers I am afraid will think I have been
bragging too much of the valor of the old
Spaniard.
I hope we shall profit by the tempo-
rary possession of the capital to discover
some of the Aztec monuments and MSS.
The Spanish archives everywhere, both
public and those belonging to private
families in Old Spain and in the colonies,
are rich in MSS., which are hoarded up
from the eye of the scholar as carefully
as if they were afraid of the facts coming
to light. Of late these collections have
been somewhat opened in the Peninsula.
But such repositories must exist in Mex-
ico, and Senor Alaman, formerly min-
ister of foreign affairs, has communicated
some to me, and made liberal use of
Prescott the Man.
335
others in his own publications. If you
meet with him you will see one of the
most accomplished and clever men in
Mexico. But I hear he was in disgrace
a year since from his royalist predilec-
tions. Could you oblige me by saying
to him if you meet him that I am very
desirous to send him my Conquest of
Peru, and if he can let me know how to
do so I shall do it at once with great
pleasure. Have you met on the spot any
of the Mexican translations of my Mex-
ico ? The third volume of one of them
contains and is filled with engravings
taken from old pictures of the time of
the Conquest, at least so it purports.
This edition alone contains also some
very learned and well-considered criti-
cism on different passages of the work.
I trust that your military duties and
dangers are now at an end, and that
Mexico will accept our propositions for
peace. It has been a war most honor-
able to our arms, as all must admit, what-
ever we may think of the wisdom of the
counsels that rushed us into it.
At the end of one of Prescott's nocto-
graph letters to his wife, written from
Philadelphia in 1828, appears a sentence
printed with most painstaking care. It
was to please the four-year-old at home,
who, he was sorry to hear, was suffer-
ing from a cold, and it ran : " I love
little Kitty, and will buy her a work-
box in New York, if she is a good girl."
But on February 1, 1829, this eldest
child, Catherine Hickling Prescott, died.
The event was, to her father, not only a
source of profound sorrow, but the oc-
casion of driving him to a close exami-
nation of the foundations of his religious
faith. " The death of my dearest daugh-
ter," he wrote in his journal, " having
made it impossible for me at present to
resume the task of composition, I have
been naturally led to more serious re-
flection than usual, and have occupied
myself in reviewing the evidences of the
Christian religion." To this work, with
characteristic thoroughness, he devoted
many weeks. In company with his fa-
ther, " an old and cautious lawyer," he
read thoroughly the various standard
works on the " Evidences." His conclu-
sion was that the Gospel narratives were
authentic, though he did not find in them
the doctrines commonly accounted ortho-
dox, and deliberately recorded his rejec-
tion of the dogmas of " eternal damna-
tion, the Trinity,the Deity of Christ, Elec-
tion, and Original Sin." Theologically,
therefore, he confirmed his belief in that
more liberal form of Unitarianism in
which he had been reared. Practically,
his life was one of those which make
observers say that its creed can't be
wrong, so reverent and pure was it, and
so filled with goodness. Yet it was this
gentle and tolerant man, abounding in all
charity of thought and deed, whom a re-
viewer in the Baltimore Catholic Maga-
zine dubbed a " bigot," while the Dublin
Quarterly Review breathed a prayer for
his " conversion from spiritual error."
Prescott's sole comment in his journal
was : " As I have always considered
charity as the foundation of every hon-
est creed, whether religious or political,
I don't believe I deserve the name of
bigot."
If suffering fools gladly and bearing
with the infirmities of the weak are evi-
dences of true religion, Prescott was
entitled to something like canonization.
From the earliest burst of his fame to
the end of his life he was peculiarly be-
set by aspirants seeking his counsel or
patronage. When, in 1840, his kinsman,
Henry Prescott of Newfoundland, wrote
to express his gratification at seeing the
family name raised to literary distinction
by Ferdinand and Isabella, he begged to
invite the historian's benevolent attention
to some accompanying poems by the
writer's daughter. A more flattering
poet was Mr. William Henry Leatham
of Wakefield, England. He wrote in
1841 to request permission to dedicate
to Prescott a corrected edition of his
336
Prescott the Man.
drama, the Siege of Granada. Three
years later, the same volunteer corre-
spondent sent some verses of his own on
Montezuma — suggested by reading the
Conquest of Mexico. Lowell thought at
one time of writing an epic on the ex-
ploits of Cortes, but he surely could never
have sounded the lyre in Mr. Leatham's
strain, in which, to quote himself, " hu-
man gore was seen to pour like water in
the sun." To show what are the unwrit-
ten penalties of fame, a few of the lines
inflicted upon Prescott may be cited : —
" He speaks no more but bows his head, his
eye-balls cease to roll.
His race is run and with the sun has passed the
monarch's soul.
Soon as the awestruck Mexicans had heard their
king was dead,
A distant wail rose on the gale, and through
the city spread.
But short their grief; each warrior-chief by
Cuitlahuac led
In wrath arose to smite his foes, if not already
fled —
Their sullen tramp has reached the camp where
Cortez vainly strives ;
The Spaniard from the wave-girt wall the gal-
lant Aztec drives ;
Till morning breaks o'er reedy lakes throughout
the dismal night,
The swarthy sons of Mexico prolong the bloody
fight.
And for his cursed stratagem the General dearly
paid,
For vainly did he wield his lance and keen
Toledo blade !"
Another English writer to whose im-
possible appeals Prescott made wonder-
fully considerate responses was Dr. Dun-
ham. That worthy but dull man, having
failed to support himself by his pen in
his own country, had the happy thought
of setting up as a literary man in Amer-
ica. Prescott's kind but frank discour-
agement of the proposal casts an instruc-
tive light upon the conditions of author-
ship in the forties.
TO DB. DUNHAM.
BOSTON, January 30, 1844.
MY DEAR SIR, — I am extremely con-
cerned to learn that the cloud still hangs
so darkly over your prospects, now that
you are again on your native soil. I was
in hopes that, once more among your
friends, and in a country where men of
letters are sufficiently numerous to make
a distinct and important class, your just
claims would be recognized. It is im-
possible for a foreigner, like myself, to
judge of the expediency of the plans you
suggest for the future maintenance of
your family. And I am grieved to be
obliged to say that I think it would be
in vain to look for a contribution towards
it here. There are so many projects that
appeal so directly to those most liberally
disposed in our community that their re-
sources seem to be preoccupied.
With respect to contributions to the
newspapers, I fear there will be as little
chance of success in that quarter. You
might indeed furnish articles on literary
matters to a respectable Journal like our
North American. But the compensation
is too inconsiderable to furnish an induce-
ment ; since it is only a dollar a printed
page. I have known this Journal to
give two dollars a page to a popular
writer who would contract for a certain
amount of pages per annum. I know
not whether this is ever done by the pre-
sent editor. Should you send anything
to me for that Journal I shall have much
pleasure in handing it to the Editor, and
ascertaining whether he would be in-
clined to make an engagement with you
for the future. Our newspapers do not
press often into their service writers
who have drunk deep of the good wells
of learning, and a penny-a-line manufac-
turer of casualties will find more encour-
agement with most of them than a man
of learning. I have suggested it to one
of our most respectable editors, but he
has given me no encouragement.
W. H. PRESCOTT.
Opening in 1858 a new volume of the
journal which he had kept for more than
forty years, Prescott wrote on the inside
of the cover, " Literary Memorandum
The Small Business as a School of Manhood.
837
Book No. XIV — and, as I eschew long
entries, probably the last." Less than
three pages were, in fact, written in this
volume. On February 4, 1858, he suf-
fered a slight stroke of apoplexy. Though
his strength slowly returned, the remain-
der of his life was passed in something
of a shadow, — yet his spirit continued
undaunted and his brightness undimmed.
Parting from his wife in merry laughter
on January 28, 1859, he went into his
study. The blow fell swiftly; he was
heard groaning, was found absolutely
unconscious, and died in a few hours.
As grieving Motley wrote, " The night
of time had suddenly descended upon
the unfinished peristyle of a stately and
beautiful temple." Before burial, the
body of Prescott was taken, in accord-
ance with a request he had made, to lie
for a time in his library. The best of
all ages looked down upon him from their
books, but not one of those " lettered
dead " was manlier or purer than he.
Rollo Ogden.
THE SMALL BUSINESS AS A SCHOOL OF MANHOOD.
FOB generations the small business,
that is, the business house as it was be-
fore the advent of the great Corporation
and the Trust, was a school of char-
acter second in importance only to the
Church. It is now rapidly being super-
seded, and the question is, What is to be
the effect upon the business world ?
Many years ago I was confidential
clerk in a typical city business house of
the old style. Its heads were two young
merchants, both from New England. As
I was their confidential clerk, I had the
opportunity of knowing them both inti-
mately, and of observing the effect of their
business upon their characters. The one
was a gentleman by instinct and family
connection, — courteous, kindly, and un-
selfish. The other was self-made, aggres-
sive, cold-blooded, ambitious, selfish, and
intelligent enough to know the value of
honesty as a policy, but without convic-
tions. The daily routine of the business
divided itself between these two men by
a kind of natural law. Everything that
required courtesy and the cultivation of
the good will of customers fell to the one ;
while the planning of the business, and
all those important decisions which had
to do with men whose good will was not
particularly important to the firm, were
VOL. xcm. — NO. 557. 22
passed upon by the other. The business
itself, with its daily necessities and rou-
tine, constituted a school of character,
giving play to the talents of both, and
holding their limitations' in restraint. It
would be interesting to look over the of-
fice letter-books of those days and read
in the correspondence the characteristic
features of those two men, one of whom
has since become very prominent. There
would be found recorded, as accurately
as in the record of a boy at school, their
native traits and the story of their growth.
Each knew, as all the men of their day
knew, that the success of every business
house depended upon the personal traits
of the partners and their individual re-
lations to the world of business, quite as
much as upon the wisdom of their plans.
This is understood in all forms of in-
dividual business, from the village store
to the city establishment, where in each
instance the storekeeper is made keenly
aware of the value of the good will of
his customers. As a consequence he ia
kept under an impulse to be courteous
and honest and considerate and truthful,
until these traits become largely charac-
teristic. Whatever men may think about
the business of the world, it is inconceiv-
able that the great business houses of the
338
The Small Business as a School of Manhood.
older type, which, passing from father to
son, sometimes survived for centuries,
could have continued under any other
conditions. The great guilds of the
Middle Ages were simply associations
of men of this pattern. They organized
for self-defense as individual merchants
or tradesmen, not in any sense as part-
ners in a corporation. And membership
in these guilds quickly came to he de-
pendent upon certain established types
of character. Because of this the guilds
held together, and became the permanent
power which resulted in making the cit-
ies the instruments which enabled the
early kings to shake off the power of the
barons, and to break up the foundations
of the feudal system in Europe. The
Chinese guilds, the oldest existing organ-
izations of business men, are also of this
class.
The record of those early days still re-
mains in our literature. Shakespeare's
tale, the Merchant of Venice, turns upon
the integrity, indisputable and dominant,
of the merchants of that time ; and the
effect of the Chinese guilds upon the Chi-
nese mercantile life is everywhere appar-
ent. The other day the president of the
Anglo-Chinese Bank at Shanghai, resign-
ing, to return to England, after twenty-
five years of service, in a public address
testified that not a dollar had ever been
lost by the bank through a Chinese mer-
chant, and that the great fear he had for
the changes now going on in the relations
between the Orient and the Occident was
lest the influx into China of foreign mer-
chants, with a different standard of per-
sonal honesty, would do more to compli-
cate and disturb the relations of China
with the outside world than any other
cause. For the Chinese have not been
familiar with the lower standards of busi-
ness integrity which prevail elsewhere.
Over against the guilds have arisen
the modern Corporation and the modern
Trust. They have so completely changed
the essential conditions of business life
as these bear upon the individual busi-
ness man, that it is well to attempt to
estimate the effect. Many men in New
York remember when A. T. Stewart
opened his great establishment in the
Chambers Street building. It soon be-
came known in the street that when any
failure occurred in the dry-goods district,
the principal man in the broken firm
would be quickly invited by Mr. Stewart
to enter his employ. And it was not
long before in the Stewart establishment
could be seen many well-known business
men, whose houses had been unfortunate,
now servants of Mr. Stewart, as buyers,
or heads of departments. A change in
the bearing of these men was noticeable
even to young people. They no longer
had either the responsibilities or the dig-
nity of their former position. Their in-
come, it is true, was assured, and per-
haps was in some cases as large as it had
been before. They were not burdened
with cares for the business as a whole, and
could go home at night with the same feel-
ing of a day's work done that other clerks
enjoyed. But they were no longer busi-
ness mien, in the old sense. They were
servants, in that their powers were obe-
dient to the decisions of another ; and
they were removed from the stimulus,
intellectual and moral, which the neces-
sities of meeting the conditions of inde-
pendent business require. It is true they
slept well at night, and grew fat and
sleek ; but one was reminded of the fable
of the wolf and the house dog, — one
looked for the sign of the collar, and
mourned for the loss of something fine
in manhood. Such a man came into the
employ of the firm for which I worked,
and his struggle to maintain his self-
respect, and his little-repressed exulta-
tion in being a member of a social club to
which his ambitious employer could not
obtain election, were to his fellow clerks
both intelligible and pathetic.
The pride of the merchant, or the
manufacturer, in the business to which
he was giving his life, and which bore
his name, and which he hoped to make
The Small Business as a School of Manhood.
339
permanent in the community and to trans-
mit to his children, has given place to
another temper of mind in the passing
of those smaller men into the great cor-
porations. Names still linger from the
early days : the Maydole hammer, the
Buck chisel, the Disston saw, the Scott
gun, the Morley hosiery, the Clay woolen,
the Torrey strop, the Hassell brush, tell
of a day when the skillful workman be-
gan to produce a better article than his
neighbor, and soon discovering that his
customers recognized its merits, found
the way open to a career in which his
heart found its sweetest pride, and his
business life its most satisfactory reward.
All that has vanished with the passing
of the old conditions.
Under the new conditions a very few
men are carrying the heavy strain, or
may be considered as responding to the
old challenge to be their very best, and
to prove themselves masters in a splen-
did contest. It must be admitted that
the prizes of the business world were
never so magnificent for the capable few
as they are to-day. The title " merchant
prince " has taken on a new significance.
But this applies only to the very few.
Where there are in every great corpora-
tion or trust two or three or, perhaps, a
few more, men at the head who carry the
responsibility and find their powers taxed
to the utmost by their daily duties, there
are thousands of all grades of capacity,
who now have no other feeling than that
of the clerk, or the servant. Their in-
tellectual activity is limited to doing the
task that is set for them. They need to
be keen, simply to understand directions
and to meet the requirements of their
department. Their moral responsibility
is limited to obeying orders and earning
their daily wage. The tax made upon
them is only to do their day's work as
it arrives, and at night leave their desk
clear. They are part of a vast machine
to whose perfection they are contribut-
ing ; and in so doing are limiting their
own powers, and bringing on the day
when they can the more readily be dis-
pensed with and forgotten. The best
they can hope for is a pension. As life
goes that is much, but it is not the best.
The other day I asked the auditor of
a great Trust, " What is the method upon
which your new business is being organ-
ized, — to make a machine so perfect
that no knave can take advantage of it,
or to develop individual character to such
an extent that the machinery shall be
relatively secondary ? " He looked at
me for a moment, and then with a curious
smile, said, " The latter is what I should
be glad to do, but my directors have dif-
ferent ideas. We are trying to make a
machine which will be as absolutely per-
fect as possible." " Then," I said, " you
will be beaten, for a man is always
cleverer than a machine." " Yes," he
said, " I fear so." He has himself since
resigned, and gone back into private busi-
ness.
The great corporation is unquestion-
ably the necessity of the hour. It will
continue to take on constantly new forms
of development. It is already playing
and will continue to play a tremendous
part in the progress of civilization. But
its limitations are none the less real. The
evils that are inevitably connected with
it must be clearly realized if they are
to be offset. Among them all none is
more serious than this radical one of the
effect upon the character of many em-
ployees, who, under former conditions,
would have been either managing their
own business or ambitious for the oppor-
tunity of doing so. The life, in a multi-
tude of homes where a salary takes the
place of business earnings, is doubtless
calmer and steadier, and also in many
cases ampler, in that the income is
larger. A certain stability is hoped for
in a society where anxiety over business
conditions is exchanged for the content-
ment of an assured stipend. And the
steadying and quieting of the temper, no
longer made irritable by the daily anx-
iety, is unquestionably a notable social
340
The Dream of Akinosuke.
contribution. Indeed, it is quite con-
ceivable that whole communities, like our
new suburban settlements, made up of
pretty homes, with their flowers and their
lawns, which are occupied so largely by
the well-to-do employees of the great cor-
porations, may be regarded as one of the
most beautiful and most characteristic
features of modern life. But when one
looks within and asks what is to take the
place of the old discipline, with its insist-
ent demand for those traits of character
which have made the merchant and the
manufacturer the sturdy, thoughtful, self-
respecting men they always have been,
we are at a loss for an answer.
When thoughtful writers like Mr. Ben-
jamin Kidd speak of " the freest possible
play of forces within the community, and
the widest possible opportunities for the
development of every individual's facul-
ties and personality " as the condition of
progress, and of "the personal rivalry
and competition of life " as being not only
now, but having been from the begin-
ning " the fundamental impulse behind
all progress," there is surely cause for
concern as we find ourselves tempted to
exploit agencies which effectually remove
or destroy those conditions.
It is certain that a great change is
going on, and one of that subtle and un-
perceived kind the effect of which is
sure to be widely felt before it is under-
stood, not to say corrected. How much
it means of difficulty, or even of disaster,
in the business world of the future, it
may be difficult to determine, but it will
certainly have a profound effect in shap-
ing the prospects even of the Trust. It
creates conditions under which it will be
growingly difficult to produce men with
the character and the intellectual stamina
which are necessary in the management
of the great corporations. Men who have
grown up simply as clerks will never be
truly competent to fill these positions.
They will become more and more men of
detail. And the system of inbreeding,
that is, of limiting the filling of their
more important posts to men who have
risen through all the ranks of lower ser-
vice, — which now is proclaimed by some
of our great railways, — is a policy as
truly suicidal as it is unintelligent. Great
administrative positions require men who
have been accustomed to that indepen-
dence of action and that breadth of view
which only the responsibility of directing
their own affairs can produce. It is a
temper of mind and of spirit as far as
possible from that of the lifelong clerk or
employee. And no problem in the busi-
ness world is more vital, or has farther-
reaching relations, than the question how
such men are in the future to be produced.
Henry A. Stimson.
THE DREAM OF AKINOSUKE.
THERE used to live, in the district of
Toichi, in the province of Yamato, a
goshi named Miyata Akinosuke". . . .
[Here I must tell you that in Japanese
feudal days there was a privileged class
of soldier-farmers, freeholders, — corre-
sponding to the class of yeomen in Eng-
land, — and these were called goshi.~\
In Akinosukd's garden there was a
very old and very large sugi tree,1 under
which he liked to rest on sultry days.
One very hot afternoon, while he was
sitting under this tree with two of his
friends, fellow-goshi, drinking wine, he
felt all of a sudden very drowsy, — so
drowsy that he begged his comrades to
excuse him for taking a nap in their
presence. Then he lay down at the foot
of the tree, and dreamed this dream : —
1 Cryptomeria Japonica.
The, Dream of Akinosuke.
341
He thought that he saw, as he lay
there, a procession advancing, like the
train of a daimyo, and that he got up to
look at it. A very grand procession it
proved to be, — more imposing than any-
thing of the kind that he had ever seen
before ; and in the van of it he observed
a number of young men, in costly ap-
parel, drawing a great lacquered palace-
carriage, or gosho - guruma, hung with
bright blue silk. When the procession
arrived within a short distance, it halt-
ed ; and a richly dressed stranger, evi-
dently a person of rank, approached
Akinosuke, bowed profoundly, and then
said : —
"You see before you, honored Sir, a
kerai [follower] of the Kokuo of To-
koyo.1 My master, the King, commands
me to greet you in his name, and to place
myself at your service. He also bids me
convey to you this message, — that he
augustly desires your presence at his pal-
ace. Be therefore pleased to enter im-
mediately this august carriage which he
has sent for you."
Upon hearing these words, Akinosuke'
wished to make some fitting reply ; but
he found himself too much astonished and
embarrassed to utter a word ; and at the
same time his will seemed to melt away,
so that he could do only as the kerai bade
him. He entered the carriage ; the kerai
took a place beside him, and gave a sig-
nal ; the drawers, seizing the silken cables,
turned the great vehicle southwards ; and
the journey began.
In a very short time, to Akinosuk^'s
surprise, the carriage stopped before a
huge two -storied gateway (romon), of
Chinese style, which he had never be-
fore seen. Here the kerai dismounted,
— saying, " I go to announce the august
arrival," — and disappeared within. Af-
ter some little waiting, Akinosuke' saw
1 This name is strangely indefinite. Accord-
ing to circumstances it may mean any unknown
or far-off country, — or it may signify that " un-
discovered country from whose bourn no travel-
ler returns," — or it may signify the Fairyland
two noble-looking men, wearing robes of
purple silk and high caps of the form in-
dicating lofty rank, come from the gate-
way. These, after having profoundly
saluted him, helped him to descend
from the carriage, and led him, through
the gate and across a vast garden, to
the entrance of a palace whose front
appeared to extend, west and east, to
a distance of miles. Presently he was
shown into a reception hall of wonder-
ful size and splendor. His guides con-
ducted him to the place of honor, and
respectfully seated themselves apart ;
while serving-maids, in costume of cere-
mony, brought refreshments. When
Akinosuke had been duly served, the two
purple-robed attendants bowed low be-
fore him, and addressed him in the fol-
lowing words, — each speaking alter-
nately, in accordance with the fashion
of courts : —
" It is now our honorable duty to in-
form you ... as to the reason of your
having been summoned hither. . . .
Our master the King augustly desires
that you become his son-in-law ; . . .
and it is his wish that you wed this very
day . . . the August Princess his daugh-
ter. . . . We shall soon conduct you to
the presence-chamber . . . where His
Augustness even now is waiting to re-
ceive you. . . . But it is necessary that
we first invest you . . . with the ap-
propriate garments of ceremony."
Having spoken thus, they rose to-
gether, and opened an alcove at the fur-
ther end of the apartment ; and they
took, from a chest of gold-lacquer in
that alcove, various robes and girdles of
rich material, and a kamuri, or regal
cap. With these they attired Akino-
suke' as befitted a princely bridegroom.
Then they conducted him to the pre-
sence room, where he saw the Kokuo of
of Far-Eastern fable, the Realm of Horai, the
Elysian Mountain. — The term " Kokuo " means
the ruler of a country, — therefore a monarch
or king.
342
The Dream of Akinosuke.
Tokoyo, seated upon the daiza,1 wearing
the high black cap of state, and robed in
robes of yellow silk. Before the daiza,
to left and right, a multitude of dignitaries
sat, motionless as images within a tem-
ple ; and Akinosukd, advancing between
their ranks, saluted the King with the
triple prostration. The King then greet-
ed him with gracious words, and said : —
" You have already been informed as
to the reason of your having been sum-
moned to Our presence. We have de-
cided that you shall become the adopted
husband of Our daughter ; and the wed-
ding ceremony shall now be performed."
As the King finished a sound of joy-
ous music was heard ; and a long train
of beautiful court ladies entered from
behind a curtain to conduct Akinosuke" to
the room in which his bride awaited him.
The room was immense ; but it was
scarcely able to contain the multitude of
guests that had assembled to witness the
ceremony. All bowed down before Aki-
nosuke', as he took his place, facing the
King's daughter, on the kneeling-cushion
made ready for him. As a maiden of
heaven the bride appeared ; and her robes
were beautiful and bright as a summer
sky. And the marriage ceremony was
performed amid great rejoicing.
Afterwards, the pair were conducted
to a suite of apartments that had been
prepared for them in another portion of
the palace ; and there received the con-
gratulations of many noble persons, and
wedding gifts almost beyond counting.
Some days later, Akinosuke' was again
summoned to the presence room. On
this occasion he was received even more
graciously than before; and the King
said to him : —
" In the southwestern part of Our do-
minion, there is an island called Raishu.
We have now appointed you the Gov-
ernor of that island. You will find the
people loyal and docile ; but their laws
have not yet been brought into proper ac-
1 This was the name given to the Estrade, or
dais, upon which a feudal prince or ruler sat
cord with the laws of Tokoyo, and their
customs have not yet been properly regu-
lated. We entrust you with the duty of
improving their social condition as much
as possible ; and We desire that you shall
rule them with wisdom and kindness.
All the preparations necessary for your
voyage to Raishu have been made."
So Akinosuke' with his bride departed
from the palace of Tokoyo, accompanied
by a great escort of nobles and of retain-
ers, and embarked upon a ship of state
provided by the King. And with favor-
ing winds he sailed safely to Raishu, and
found the good people of the island as-
sembled upon the beach to welcome him.
Then he entered upon his new duties
at once ; and they did not prove difficult.
During the first three years of his gov-
ernorship, he was occupied chiefly with
the devising and the enactment of laws ;
but he had wise counselors to help him,
and he never found the work unpleasant.
When it had all been finished, he had no
active duties to perform, beyond attend-
ing ,the ceremonies and rites ordained
by ancient custom. The country was so
healthy and so fertile that -sickness and
want were unknown ; and the people were
so good that no laws were ever broken.
And Akinosuk^ dwelt and ruled in Rai-
shu for twenty years more, — making in
all twenty-three years of sojourn, during
which no shadow of sorrow traversed his
life.
But in the twenty-fourth year of his
governorship a great misfortune came to
him ; for the princess his wife, who had
borne him seven children, — five boys
and two girls, — fell sick and died. She
was buried with high pomp on the sum-
mit of a hill in the district of Hanryoko ;
and a monument, exceedingly splendid,
was erected above her grave. But Aki-
nosuk£ felt such grief at her loss that he
no longer cared to live.
Now, when the legal period of mourn-
ing was over, there came to Raishu a
in state. Literally the term signifies " great
seat."
The Dream of Akinosuke.
343
King's messenger (shisha) from Tokoyo.
The shisha delivered a message of con-
dolence to Akinosukd, and then said to
him : —
" These are the words of our august
master, the King of Tokoyo, which I am
bidden to repeat : We will now send
you back to your native place. As for
the seven children, they are the grand-
sons and the granddaughters of the
King, and shall be properly cared for.
Do not, therefore, allow your mind to be
troubled concerning them."
On receiving this mandate, Akinosuke*
prepared for his departure. When all
his affairs had been arranged, and the
ceremony of bidding farewell to his coun-
selors and trusted officials had been con-
cluded, he was escorted with great honor
to the port. There he embarked upon the
ship sent for him ; — and the ship sailed
out into the blue sea under the blue sky ;
— and the shape of the island of Raishu
turned likewise blue, and then turned
gray, and then vanished like a ghost.
And Akinosuke' suddenly awoke un-
der the sugi tree in his own garden ! . . .
For the moment he was dazed and
stupefied. But he saw his two friends
still seated near him, — drinking and
chatting merrily. He stared at them
in a bewildered way, and cried aloud,
" How strange ! "
"Akinosuke' must have been dream-
ing," one of them said, with a laugh.
" What did you see, Akinosuke', that
was so strange ? "
Then Akinosuke' told them all his
dream, — that dream of three-and-twenty
years passed in the island of Raishu, in
the realm of Tokoyo ; — and they won-
dered very much, because he had really
slept for no more than a few minutes.
One of the goshi said : —
" You saw strange things indeed ! We
also saw something strange while you
were asleep. A little yellow butterfly
was fluttering over your face for a mo-
ment or two ; and we watched it. Then
it lighted on the ground beside you, close
to the tree ; and almost as soon as it
perched there, a big, big ant came out of
a hole, and seized it, and dragged it down
into the hole. Just before you awoke,
we saw that very butterfly come out of
the hole again, and flutter over your face
as before. Then it disappeared : we do
not know where it went."
" Perhaps it was Akinosuke^s soul,"
the other goshi said ; " certainly I
thought that I saw it fly into his mouth.
. . . But even if that butterfly was Aki-
nosuke" s soul, the fact would not explain
his dream."
" The ants might explain it," said the
first speaker. . . . "Ants are queer beings,
— possibly goblins. . . . Anyhow, there
is a big nest of ants under that sugi tree."
" Then let us look ! " exclaimed Aki-
nosuke', greatly impressed by the sugges-
tion ; and he went for a spade.
The ground beneath and about the
tree proved to have been excavated in
the most surprising way by a prodigious
colony of ants, whose tiny constructions
of sticks and straws and leaves and clay
bore an odd resemblance to miniature
cities. In the centre of one construction,
larger than the rest, there was a marvel-
ous swarming of small ants around one
very big ant, which had yellowish wings,
and a long black head.
" Why, there is the King of my
dream!" cried Akinosuke', "and there
is the palace of Tokoyo ! . . . How ex-
traordinary ! . . . Raishu ought to lie
somewhere southwest of it, — to the left
of that big forked root . . . Yes ! here
it is ! . . . How very strange ! Now I
am sure that I can find the hill at Han-
ryoko, and even the grave of the prin-
cess." . . .
He searched and searched in the wreck
of the nest, and actually discovered a tiny
mound, on the top of which was lying a
water-worn pebble, resembling in shape
a Buddhist tomb. Underneath it he
found, embedded in clay, the dead body
of a female ant . . . !
Lafcadio Hearn.
344
Books Unread.
PART OF A MAN'S LIFE.
" The uttered part of a man's life, let us always repeat, bears to the unuttered, unconscious
part a small unknown proportion. He himself never knows it, much less do others." — Carlyle's
Essay on Scott.
BOOKS UNEEAD.
than by Margaret Fuller when she says,
" A man who means to think and write
a great deal must, after six and twenty,
learn to read with his fingers." A few
men of leisure may satisfy themselves
by reading over and over a single book
and ignoring all others, like that Eng-
lish scholar who read Homer's Iliad and
Odyssey every year in the original, de-
voting a week to each canto, and reserv-
ing the minor poems for his summer vaca-
tion. Nay, there are books in the English
language so vast that the ordinary reader
recoils before their text and their foot-
notes. Such, for instance, is Gibbon's
Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire,
containing substantially the history of
the whole world for thirteen centuries.
When the author dismissed the last page
of his book, on June 27, 1787, in that his-
toric garden at Geneva, knowing that he
was to address his public at once in four
different languages, is it not possible that
he may have felt some natural misgiving
as to whether any one person would ever
read the whole of it ? We know him to
have predicted that Fielding's Tom Jones
would outlast the palace of the Escurial
and the imperial eagle of Austria, but he
recorded no similar claim for his own
work. The statesman, Fox, to be sure,
pronounced the book to be " immortal,"
simply because, as he said, no man in
the world could do without it ; and Sher-
idan added, with undue levity, that if
not luminous, it was at least voluminous.
But modern readers, as a rule, consult it,
they do not read it. It is, at best, a tool-
chest.
Yet there lies before me what is, per-
haps, the most remarkable manuscript
ofcf yap TO viro/j.vri(*dTid
ffov ft.f\\tis a.vayiv<i>ffKfiv, afire ras apxaicov
'Pamaiiuf Kal 'E\\rjv(tjv irpofeiy, Kal ras e/c ruv
awYypa.find.Toiv fK\oyas, &s els TO yrfpas aavTip
aTreTlBfffo." — MABCUS ANTONINUS, iii, 14.
" No longer delude thyself ; for thon wilt
never read thine own memoranda, nor the re-
corded deeds of old Romans and Greeks, and
those passages in books which tliou hast been
reserving for thine old age."
IN the gradual growth of every stu-
dent's library, he may or may not con-
tinue to admit literary friends and ad-
visers ; but he will be sure, sooner or
later, to send for a man with a tool-chest.
Sooner or later, every nook and corner
will be filled with books, every window
will be more or less darkened, and added
shelves must be devised. He may find
it hard to achieve just the arrangement
he wants, but he will find it hardest of
all to meet squarely that inevitable in-
quiry of the puzzled carpenter, as he looks
about him, " Have you really read all
these books ? " The expected answer is,
" To be sure, how can you doubt it ? "
Yet if you asked him in turn, "Have
you actually used every tool in your tool-
chest?" you would very likely be told,
" Not one half as yet, at least this sea-
son ; I have the others by me, to use as
I need them." Now if this reply can be
fairly made in a simple, well-defined, dis-
tinctly limited occupation like that of a
joiner, how much more inevitable it is in
a pursuit which covers the whole range
of thought and all the facts in the uni-
verse. The library is the author's tool-
chest. He must at least learn, as he grows
older, to take what he wants and to leave
the rest.
This never was more tersely expressed
Books Unread.
345
catalogue of books read that can be found
in the English-speaking world, this being
the work of a man of eighty-three, who
began life by reading a verse of the Bible
aloud to his mother when three years old,
had gone through the whole of it by the
time he was nine, and then went on to
grapple with all the rest of literature,
upon which he is still at work. His vast
catalogue of books read begins with 1837,
and continues up to the present day, thus
covering much more than half a century,
a course of reading not yet finished and
in which Gibbon is but an incident. One
finds, for instance, at intervals, such items
as these : " Gibbon's Decline and Fall of
the Koman Empire, read twice between
1856 and 1894 ; " « Gibbon's Decline and
Fall, third reading, 1895 ; " " Gibbon's
Decline and Fall, vols. 1 and 2, fourth
reading ; " followed soon after by " Gib-
bon, vols. 3-6, fourth reading ; " " Gib-
bon, vols. 7-8, fourth reading." What
are a thousand readings of Tom Jones
compared with a series of feats like this ?
And there is a certain satisfaction to those
who find themselves staggered by the con-
templation of such labor, when they read
elsewhere on the list the recorded confes-
sion that this man of wonderful toil oc-
casionally stooped so far as cheerfully to
include That Frenchman and Mr. Barnes
of New York.
The list of books unread might proper-
ly begin with those painted shelves of
mere book covers which present them-
selves in some large libraries, to veil the
passageway. These are not books un-
read, since they are not books at all.
Much the same is true of those which
perhaps may still be seen, as formerly, in
old Dutch houses round Albany ; the effi-
gies of books merely desired, but not yet
possessed ; and only proposed as pur-
chases for some day when the owner's
ship should come in. These were made
only of blocks of wood, neatly painted
and bound in leather with the proper la-
bets, but surely destined never to be read,
since they had in them nothing readable.
Almost as remote from the real books
are those dummies made up by booksell-
ers to be exhibited by their traveling
agents. Thus I have at hand a volume
of my own translation of Epictetus, con-
sisting of a single " signature " of eigh-
teen pages, repeated over and over, so
that one never gets any farther : each
signature bearing on the last page, by one
of Fate's simple and unconscious strokes,
the printed question, "Where is progress,
then ? " (page 18). Where, indeed !
Next to these, of course, the books which
go most thoroughly unread are those
which certainly are books, but of which
we explore the backs only, as in fine old
European libraries ; books as sacredly
preserved as was once that library at
Blenheim, — now long since dispersed, —
in which, when I idly asked the custo-
dian whether she did not find it a great
deal of trouble to keep them dusted, she
answered with surprise, " No, sir, the
doors have not been unlocked for ten
years." It is so in some departments of
even American libraries.
Matthew Arnold once replied to a
critic who accused him of a lack of learn-
ing that the charge was true, but that he
often wished he had still less of that pos-
session, so hard did he find it to carry
lightly what he knew. The only know-
ledge that involves no burden lies, it may
be justly claimed, in the books that are
left unread. I mean those which remain
undisturbed, long and perhaps forever, on
a student's bookshelves ; books for which
he possibly economized, and to obtain
which he went without his dinner ; books
on whose backs his eyes have rested a
thousand times, t'enderly and almost lov-
ingly, until he has perhaps forgotten the
very language in which they are written.
He has never read them, yet during these
years there has never been a day when
he would have sold them ; they are a part
of his youth. In dreams he turns to
them ; in dreams he reads Hebrew again ;
he knows what a Differential Equation
is ; " how happy could he be with either."
346
Books Unread.
He awakens, and whole shelves of his
library are, as it were, like fair maidens
who smiled on him in their youth but
once, and then passed away. Under dif-
ferent circumstances, who knows but one
of them might have been his ? As it is,
they have grown old apart from him ; yet
for him they retain their charms. He
meets them as the ever delightful but
now half-forgotten poet Praed meets his
" Belle of the Bail-Room " in later years :
' ' For in my heart's most secret cell
There had been many other lodgers ;
And she was not the ball-room's belle,
But only Mrs. Something Rogers."
So in my case, my neighbors at the
Harvard Observatory have solved the
differential equations ; my other neigh-
bors, the priests, have read — let us hope
— the Hebrew psalms ; but I live to
ponder on the books unread.
This volume of Hirsch's Algebra, for
instance, takes me back to a happy period
when I felt the charm given to mathemat-
ics by the elder Peirce, and might easily
have been won to devote my life to them,
had casual tutorships been tossed about
so freely as now. No books retain their
attraction when reopened, I think, as
much as the mathematical ; the quaint
formulae seeming like fascinating recluses
with cowled heads. A mere foreign lan-
guage, even if half forgotten, is some-
thing that can be revived again. It is
simply another country of the world, and
you can revisit it at will ; but mathemat-
ics is another world. To reenter it would
be to leave common life behind, and yet
it seems so attractive that even to sit
down and calculate a table of logarithms
would appear tempting. The fact of
dwelling near an observatory, as I do,
might seem to nourish this illusion, yet I
have never encountered any pursuit, not
even astronomy, which does not leave its
votaries still, by their own confession,
bound by the limitations of mortal men.
Many books go unread in our libra-
ries that are prized for their associations
only. There is, for instance, yonder set
of Fourier in five volumes. I have read
them little, but they are full of manu-
scripf notes in the fine Italian hand of the
dear friend to whom I loaned them in
our days at the University. His life and
career have e^er been a note of sadness
in those early memories, but when I open
the books he comes before me in all his
youthful charm. There is Fourier's por-
trait, still noble and impressive as when
I pasted it in the first volume ; nothing
in his books ever equaled it, yet its ex-
pression is as hard to read as were his
books. How much of that period they
all represent ! and each time I open them,
the face of Fourier seems to fade away,
and there is the shadowy impression of
that of my friend, just receding at the
open door.
The same illusion extends also to all
one's shelves of Greek and Latin authors ;
they reproduce their associations. We
chant with Pindar, sing with Catullus,
without taking a book from its place.
Yonder series of volumes of JEschylus,
with his commentators, holds the eye with
charm and reverence ; I rarely open any
one of them except that which contains
the Agamemnon ; and that most often to
verify some re - reading of FitzGerald's
wonderful translation ; the only version
from the Greek, so far as I know, in
which the original text is bettered, and
one in which the translator has moreover
put whole passages of his own, that fitly
match the original. Yet he wrote in a
letter which lies before me, "I am yet
not astonished (at my all but seventy
years of age) with the credit given me
for so far succeeding in reproducing other
men's thoughts, which is all I have tried
to do. [Italics my own.] I know yet
many others would have done as well,
and any Poet better." And again, on
those other shelves are sixteen volumes
relating to Aristophanes, of which only
three contain the originals, and all the
rest hold only commentaries or transla-
tions, exhibiting the works of the one
light or joyous brain which ancient
Books Unread.
347
Greece produced ; a poet who was able
to balance all the tragedians by the grace
and charm of his often translated but
never reproduced comedy of The Birds.
Books which we have first read in odd
places always retain their charm, whether
read or neglected. Thus Hazlitt always
remembered that it was on the 10th of
April, 1798, that he " sat down to a vol-
ume of the New Eloise at the Inn at Llan-
gollen over a bottle of sherry and a cold
chicken." In the same way I remember
how Professor Longfellow in college re-
commended to us, for forming a good
French style, to read Balzac's Peau de
Chagrin ; and yet it was a dozen years
later before I found it in a country inn,
on a lecture trip, and sat up half the
night to read it. It may be, on the other
hand, that such haphazard meetings with
books sometimes present them under con-
ditions hopelessly unfavorable, as when
I encountered Whitman's Leaves of
Grass for the first time on my first voy-
age in an Azorian barque ; and it inspires
to this day a slight sense of nausea, which
it might, after all, have inspired equally
on land.
Some of my own books, probably the
most battered and timeworn, have re-
called for nearly half a century the as-
sociations of camp life during the civil
war. They represent the few chosen
or more likely accidental volumes that
stood against the wall in the primitive
little shelves at some picket station. A
part of them survived to be brought home
again : the small Horace ; the thin vol-
ume containing that unsurpassed book
of terse nobleness, Sir Thomas Browne's
Christian Morals ; the new translation of
Jean Paul's Titan just then published,
sent from home by a zealous friend, and
handed from tent to tent for reading in
the long summer afternoons ; books in-
terrupted by the bugle and then begun
again. They were perhaps read and re-
read, or perhaps never even opened ; they
may never have been opened since ; but
they now seem like silent members of
the Loyal Legion or the Grand Army of
the Republic. I may or may not care
much for the individual men as they are,
but they represent what was and what
might have been ; and it is the same with
the books. The same mixture of feel-
ings applies to certain French or German
books bought in the lands where they
were printed, or even imported thence,
or from old bookstores in London. No
matter ; their land is the world of litera-
ture ; their mere presence imparts a
feeling like that which Charles Lamb
applies to himself in the cloisters at Ox-
ford which he had visited only during
the weeks of vacation : " In graver moods,
I proceed Master of Ai-ts."
The books most loved of all in a stu-
dent's library are perhaps those which
first awakened his literary enthusiasm,
and which are so long since superseded
by other and possibly better books that he
leaves them unread and yet cannot part
with them ; books which even now open
of themselves at certain favorite passages,
having a charm that can never be com-
municated to a more recent reader. Re-
membering, as I do, the first books which
created in America the long period of
enthusiasm for German literature which
has now seemingly spent itself, I turn to
them with ever fresh delight, although
I may rarely open them. Such, for in-
stance, are Heine's Letters on German
Literature, translated by G. W. Haven
in this country in 1836, and Mrs. Aus-
ten's Characteristics of Goethe, largely
founded on Falk's recollections, and pub-
lished in 1841. A passage in this last
book which always charmed me was
that which described how the heroes of
German literature — Goethe, Herder,
Wieland, and Gleim — went out with the
Court into the forests where Goethe's
gypsy songs were written ; and another
passage where it says, "At the hermitage,
where a visit from a wandering stag is
not uncommon, and where the forester
watches the game by the light of the
autumnal moon, a majestic tree is yet
348
Books Unread.
standing, on which, inscribed as in a liv-
ing album, the names of Herder, Gleim,
Lavater, Wieland, and Goethe, are still
distinctly legible." How many vows I
made in youth to visit that little hermit-
age built of trunks of trees and covered
with moss, on whose walls Goethe had
written the slumber song of summer : —
Ueber alien Gipfeln
1st Huh,
In alien Wipf eln
Spiirest da
Kaum einen Hauch ;
Die Vogelein schweigen im Walde.
Warte nur, balde
Ruhest du auch.
Thus much for Goethe's Characteristics.
I fear that my boyish copy of Heine opens
of itself at the immortal compliment
given by the violin player Solomons to
George III of England, then his pupil :
" Violin players are divided into three
classes : to the first belong those who
cannot play at all ; to the second belong
those who play very miserably ; and to
the third, those who play finely ; Your
Majesty has already elevated yourself to
the rank of the second class." Tried
by such a classification, Heine certainly
ranks in the third class, not the second ;
yet strange it is that, of the two German
authors who bid fair to live longest on
the road to immortality, the one, Goethe,
should be the most absolutely German
among them all, while Heine died in
heart, as in residence, a Frenchman.
But there are other books, perhaps
inherited or bought in a deluded hour,
that have no page at which they open of
themselves through mere habit. " What
actual benefits do we reap," asks Hazlitt,
" from the writings of a Laud, or a Whit-
gift, or a Bishop Bull, or a Bishop Water-
land, or Prideaux's Connections, or Beau-
sobre, or St. Augustine, or of Pufendorf,
or of Vattel ? " Take from this list St.
Augustine, and I could indorse it; but
his Confessions I think will forever
remain fascinating because they are in-
tensely human, though one cannot easily
read more than one or two pages at a
time. He makes revelations which are,
in depth of feeling, when compared to
the far-famed Confessions of Rousseau,
as Hamlet to Love's Labour 's Lost. I
refer especially, in case we must read
it in English, to a fine anonymous frag-
mentary translation, far superior to Pu-
sey's, and edited by Miss Elizabeth P.
Peabody in Boston, sixty years ago.
Upon what superb sentences does one
open in this version, " How deep are
Thy ways, O God, Thou only great, that
sittest silent on high and by an unwearied
law dispensing penal blindness to lawless
desires ! " How this thought of penal
blindness haunted the author ! and who
ever penetrated the desultory tragedies
of too ardent youth like Augustine?
" Thy wrath had gathered over me, and
I knew it not. I was grown deaf by the
clanking of the chain of my mortality, the
punishment of the pride of my soul, and
I strayed further from Thee, and Thou
lettest me alone, and I was tossed about,
and wasted, and dissipated, and I boiled
over in my fornications, and Thou held-
est Thy peace, 0 Thou my tardy joy !
Thou then heldest Thy peace, and I wan-
dered further and further from Thee,
into more and more fruitless seed-plots
of sorrow, and a proud dejectedness, and
a restless weariness." What trenchant
phrases are these ! — and what self -analy-
sis in such revelations as this : " What is
worthy of blame but Vice ? But I made
myself worse than I was, that I might
not be dispraised ; and when in anything
I had not sinned like the abandoned ones,
I would say that I had done what I had
not done, that I might not seem con-
temptible in proportion as I was innocent ;
or of less account, the more chaste."
Who can wonder that the heretical
Pope, Clement XIV (Ganganelli), wrote,
" Take care to procure the Confessions
of St. Augustine, a book written with
his tears " ? or who can be surprised that
a certain Bishop said to Augustine's mo-
ther, when she reproached him for not
watching and questioning her son inces-
Books Unread.
349
santly, "Go thy ways and God bless
thee, for it is not possible that the son
of these tears should perish " ? Most im-
portant of all, and a passage which I, for
one, would gladly see engrossed on parch-
ment and hung above the desk of every
teacher of elocution in America, is the
following : —
"Behold, O Lord God, yea, behold
patiently, as Thou art wont, how care-
fully the sons of men observe the cove-
nanted rules of letters and syllables that
those who spake before them used, neg-
lecting the eternal covenant of everlast-
ing salvation received from Thee. In
asmuch, that a teacher or learner of the
hereditary laws of pronunciation will
more offend men, by speaking without
the aspirate, of a ' uman being,' in de-
spite of the laws of grammar, than if he,
a ' human being,' hate a ' human being '
in despite of Thee. ... In quest of the
fame of eloquence, a man standing before
a human judge, surrounded by a human
throng, declaiming against his enemy
with fiercest hatred, will take heed most
watchfully, lest, by an error of the tongue,
he murder the word ' human-being ; '
but takes no heed, lest, through the mal-
ice of his heart, he murder the real hu-
man being."
There are many books which, although
left unread, are to be valued for single
sentences only, to be found here and
there. Others are prized for the pic-
turesque manner in which their quarto
or folio pages are filled with capital or
italic letters, or even for the superb and
daring eccentricity of their title-pages
alone. I have volumes of Jacob Behmen
where each detached line of the title-page
has something quaint and picturesque in
it, and a dozen different fonts of type
are drawn upon to conduct the reader
through their mazes, as for instance in
this: —
" Aurora.
That is, the
Day-Spring.
Or
Dawning of the Day in the Orient
Or
Morning-Rednesse
in the Rising of the
Sun.
That is
The Root or Mother of
Philosophic, Astrologie & Theologie
from the true Ground.
Or
A Description of Nature.
All this set down diligently from a true
Ground in the Knowledge of the
Spirit, and in the impulse of God,
By
Jacob Behme
Teutonick Philosopher.
Being his First Book.
Written in Gerlitz in Germany Anno
Christi M. DC. XII. on Tuesday after
the Day of Pentecost or Whitsunday
^tatis suae 37.
London, Printed by John Streater, for
Giles [sic] Calvert, and are be sold at
his Shop at the Black-spread-Eagle at
the West-End of Pauls, 1656."
Could I represent this title-page by pho-
tography as it is, you would see " Day-
Spring " in lower-case letters ; but in the
largest type of all, as if leading a flight,
the " Morning-Rednesse " in broad smil-
ing German text, the " Dawning of the
Day in the Orient " in a long italic line
which suggests the very expansion of the
light ; and the " Sun " in the very centre
of the page, as if all else were concentrat-
ed there ; the word itself being made still
terser, if possible, by the old-fashioned
spelling, since it reads briefly " SVN."
Or consider such a magnificent hurl-
ing together of stately and solemn words
as this ; the whole Judgment Day of the
Universe, as it were, brought together
into a title-page : —
" Signatura Rerum :
or the
Signature of all Things:
shewing
The Sign, and Signification of the sev-
erall
350
Books Unread.
Forms and Shapes in the
Creation :
And what the
Beginning, Ruin, and Cure of every
Thing is ; it proceeds out of Eternity
into Time,
and again out of Time into Eternity,
and comp-
rizeth All Mysteries.
Written in High Dutch, MDCXXIL
By Jacob Behmen,
alias
Teutonicus Phylosophus.
London,
Printed by John Macock, for Gyles Cal-
vert, at the black spread
Eagle, at the West end of Pauls Church,
1651."
Here again the words " Beginning, Ruin,
and Cure " are given in large italic let-
ters, and I never open the book without
a renewed sensation of awe, very much
as if I were standing beside that gulf
which yawned at Lisbon in 1755, and
had seen those 30,000 human beings
swallowed up before my eyes.
We do not sufficiently appreciate, in
modern books, the condensed and at
least readable title-pages which stand
sentinel, as it were, at their beginning.
We forget how much more easily the
books of two centuries ago were left un-
read, inasmuch as the title-page was apt
to be in itself as long as a book. Take,
for instance, this quaint work, not to be
found in Allibone's Dictionary of Au-
thors, but owing its authorship to " J.
Bland, Professor of Physic," who pub-
lished in 1773, at London, " An Essay in
Praise of Women ; or a Looking Glass
for Ladies to see their Perfections in
with Observations how the Godhead
seemed concerned in their Creation ;
what Respect is due to them on that
Account ; how they have behaved in all
Ages and especially in our Saviour's
Time." Thus begins the title-page, which
is as long as an ordinary chapter, and
closes thus : " Also Observations and Re-
flections in Defense against base and
satirical Authors, proving them not only
erroneous and diabolical but repugnant
to Holy Scripture. The Whole being a
Composition of Wit and Humor, Moral-
ity and Divinity fit to be perused by all
the curious and ingenious, especially the
Ladies." After this title-page, it is ask-
ing too much of any one to read the book,
unless it be to study the manner in which
the tea-table, now held so innocent, had,
in 1733, such associations of luxury and
extravagance that Professor J. Bland is
compelled to implore husbands not to find
fault with it. " More harmless liquor
could never be invented than the ladies
in this age have made choice of. What
is so pleasant and grateful to the taste as
a dish of tea, sweetened with fine loaf
sugar ? What more innocent banquet
could have ever been in use than this?
and what more becoming conversation
than the inoffensive, sweet and melodi-
ous expressions of the fair ones over an
entertainment so much like themselves ? "
Or let us turn to one of the early
American books, " The Columbian Muse,
a Selection of American Poetry from
various Authors of Established Reputa-
tion. Published in New York in 1794."
The most patriotic American could not
now read it with patience, yet the most
unpatriotic cannot deny its quaint and
fervent flavor. It is full of verses on the
President's birthday and the genius of
America ; and of separate odes on Amer-
ican sages, American poets, and Ameri-
can painters. The monotonous coup-
lets, the resounding adjectives, the per-
sonifications, the exclamation points, all
belong to their period, the time when
" Inoculation, heavenly maid " was
deemed an appropriate opening for an
ode. The very love poetry was patriotic
and bore the title " On Love and the
American Fair," by Colonel Humphreys,
who also contributes a discourse on " The
Future State," which turns out to refer
to " Western Territory." Aside from the
semi-political allusions there is no local
coloring whatever, except that Richard
Books Unread.
351
Alsop in an elegy written in February,
1791, gives the very first instance, so far
as I know, of au allusion in verse to any
flower distinctively American : —
" There the Wild-Rose in earliest pride shall
bloom,
There the Magnolia's gorgeous flowers un-
fold,
The purple Violet shed its sweet perfume :
And beauteous Meadia wave her plumes of
gold."
This last plant, though not here accurate-
ly described, must evidently have been
the Dodecatheon Meadia, or " Shooting
Star." This is really the highest point of
Americanism attained in the dingy little
volume ; the low-water mark being clear-
ly found when we read in the same vol-
ume the work of a poet then known as
" W. M. Smith, Esq.," who could thus
appeal to American farmers to celebrate
a birthday : —
" Shepherds, then, the chorus join,
Haste the festive wreath to twine :
Come with bosoms all sincere,
Come with breasts devoid of care ;
Bring the pipe and merry lay,
'T is Elua's natal day."
Wordsworth says in his Personal Talk,
" Dreams, books are each a world ; "
and the books unread mingle with the
dreams and unite the charm of both.
This applies especially, I think, to books
of travel ; we buy them, finding their
attractions strong, but somehow we do
not read them over and over, unless
they prove to be such books as those of
Urquhart, — the Pillars of Hercules espe-
cially, where the wealth of learning and
originality is so great that we seem in a
different region of the globe on every
page. One of the most poetic things
about Whittier's temperament lay in this
fact, that he felt most eager to visit each
foreign country before he had read any
book about it. After reading, the dream
was half fulfilled, and he turned to some-
thing else, so that he died without visit-
ing any foreign country. But the very
possession of such books, and their pre-
sence on the shelves, carries one to the
Arctic regions or to the Indian Ocean.
No single book of travels in Oceanica, it
may be, will last so long as that one stanza
of Whittier's, —
" I know not where Thine islands lift
Their f ronded palms in air ;
But this I know, I cannot drift
Beyond Thy love and care."
How often have I known that poem to
be recited by those who did not even
know the meaning of the word " f rond-
ed " ! It is the poet, not the explorer
or the geographer, who makes the whole
round world his own.
' After all," as the brilliant and melan-
choly Ruf us Choate said, " a book is the
only immortality ; " and sometimes when
a book is attacked and even denounced,
its destiny of fame is only confirmed.
Thus the vivacious and cheery Pope, Pio
Nono, when asked by a too daring author
to help on his latest publication, suggest-
ed that he could only aid it by putting it
in the Index Expurgatorius. Yet if a
book is to be left unread at last, the fault
must ultimately rest on the author, even
as the brilliant Lady Eastlake com-
plained, when she wrote of modern Eng-
lish novelists, " Things are written now
to be read once, and no more ; that is,
they are read as often as they deserve.
A book in old times took five years to
write and was read five hundred times
by five hundred people. Now it is writ-
ten in three months, and read once by
five hundred thousand people. That 's
the proper proportion."
Thomas Wentworth Higginson.
352 Thanks. — The Common Lot.
THANKS.
THANKS to you, sun and moon and star,
And you, blue level with no cloud, —
Thanks to you, splendors from afar,
For a high heart, a neck unbowed.
Thanks to you, wind, sent to and fro,
To you, light, pouring from the dawn ;
Thanks for the breath and glory-flow
The steadfast soul can feed upon.
Thanks to you, pain and want and care,
And you, joys, cunning to deceive,
And you, balked phantoms of despair;
I battle on, and I believe.
Thanks to you ministers benign,
In whatsoever guise you come ;
Under this fig tree and this vine,
Here I am master, and at home.
John Vance Cheney.
THE COMMON LOT.1
VIII. died and remembered him in their
wills."
" HELLO, Jackie ! " But Cook dismissed the subject by
Such familiarity of address on the part calling out to one of the men, " Say,
of Wright's head draughtsman had long Ed, come over here and tell me what
annoyed Hart, but this morning, instead you were trying to do with this old hen-
of nodding curtly, he replied briskly, — coop."
" Hello, Cookey ! " He might take privileges with the au-
The draughtsman winked at his neigh- gust Jackson Hart, whose foreign train-
bor and thrust out an elbow at a derisive ing had rather oppressed the office force
angle, as he laid himself down on the at times ; but he would not allow Gracie
linen plan he was carefully inking in. Bellows, the stenographer, to " mix " in
The man next to him snickered, and the his joke.
stenographer just outside the door smiled. Cook was a spare, black-haired little
An office joke was in the air. man, with beady brown eyes, like a squir-
" Mr. Hart looks as though something rel's. He was a product of Wright's
good had happened to him," the ste- Chicago office, having worked his way to
nographer remarked in a mincing tone, the practical headship of the force. Al-
" Perhaps some more of his folks have though he permitted himself his little
1 Copyright, 1903, by ROBERT HKKKICK.
The Common Lot.
353
fling at Hart, he was the young architect's
warmest admirer, approving even those
magnificent palaces of the French Renais-
sance type which the Beaux Arts man
put forth during the first months of his
connection with the firm.
The little man, who was as sharp as
one of his own India ink lines, could see
that Hart had something on his mind,
and he was curious, in all friendliness, to
find out what it was. But Hart did not
emerge from his little box of an office
for several hours. Then he sauntered
by Cook's table, pausing to look out of
the window while he abstractedly lighted
a cigarette.
Presently the stenographer came up
to Hart and said : —
" Mr. Graves is out there and wants
to see you particular, Mr. Hart. Shall
I show him into your office ? "
"Ask him to wait," the young archi-
tect ordered.
After he had smoked and stared for a
few moments longer, he turned to Cook.
"What did we specify those I-beams
on the Canostota ? Were they forty-twos
or sixties ? "
Without raising his hand from the mi-
nute lines of the linen sheet, the draughts-
man grunted : —
" Don't remember j ust what. Were n't
forty -twos. Nothing less than sixties
ever got out of this office, I guess. May
be eighties."
" Um," the architect reflected, knock-
ing his cigarette against the table. " It
makes a difference in the sizes what make
they are, does n't it ? "
" It don't make any difference about
the weights ! " And the draughtsman
turned to his linen sheet with a shrug of
the shoulders that said, " You ought to
know that much ! "
The architect continued to stare out
of the murky window.
" When is Harmon coming back?"
" Ed lives out his way, and he says
it 's long-term typhoid. You can't tell
when he '11 be back."
VOL. xcm. — NO. 557. 23
" Has the old man wired anything new
about his plans ? "
" You '11 have to ask Miss Bellows."
" He said he 'd be here next Wednes-
day or Thursday at the latest."
The draughtsman stared hard at Hart,
wondering what was in the man's mind.
But he made no answer to the last re-
mark, and presently Hart sauntered to
the next window.
As Hart well knew, Graves was wait-
ing to close that arrangement which he
had proposed for building an apartment
house. The architect had intended to
look up the Canostota specifications be-
fore he went further with Graves, but he
had been distracted by other matters.
Jackson Hart was not given to undue
speculation over matters of conduct. He
had a serviceable code of business morals,
which hitherto had met all the demands
of his experience. He called this code
"professional etiquette." In this case
he was not clear how the code should
be applied. The Canostota was not his
affair. It was only by the merest acci-
dent that he had been sent there that day
to help the electricians, and had seen
that drill-hole which had led him to
question the thickness of the I-beams,
about which he might very well have
been mistaken. If there were anything
wrong with them, it was Wright's busi-
ness to see that the contractor was pro-
perly watched when the steel work was
being run through the mill. And he did
not feel any special sense of obligation
toward Wright, who had never displayed
any great confidence in him.
He wanted the contractor's commis-
sion, now more than ever, with his en-
gagement to Helen freshly pricking him
to look for bread and butter ; wanted it
all the more because all thought of fight-
ing his uncle's will had gone when Helen
had accepted him.
When he rang for the stenographer
and told her to show Graves into his
office, he had made up his mind. Clos-
ing his door, he turned and looked into
354
The Common Lot.
the contractor's heavy face with an air
of alert determination. He was about
to play his own game for the first time,
and he felt the man's excitement of it !
The two remained shut up in Hart's
cubby-hole for over an hour. When
Cook had returned from the restaurant
in the basement where he lunched, and
the other men had taken their hats and
coats from the lockers, Hart stepped out
of his office and walked across the room
to Cook's table. He spread before the
draughtsman a fresh sepia sketch, the
water scarcely dried on it. It was the
front elevation for a house, such a one
as is described impressively in the news-
papers as " Mr. So-and-So's handsome
country residence."
" Now, that 's what I call a peach ! "
Cook whistled through his closed teeth,
squinting at the sketch admiringly. " No-
thing like that residence has come out of
this office for a good long time. The old
man don't favor houses as a rule. Is this
for some magnate ? "
" This is n't for the firm," Hart an-
swered.
" Oh ! " Cook received the news with
evident disappointment. " Just a fancy
sketch?"
" Not for a minute ! This is my own
business. It's for a Mrs. Phillips at
Forest Park."
Cook looked again at the elevation of
the large house with admiring eyes. If
he had ever penetrated beyond the con-
fines of Cook County in the state of Illi-
nois, he might have wondered less at
Hart's creation. But he was not fami-
liar with the Loire chateaux, even in
photograph, for Wright's taste happened
to be early English.
" So you 're going to shake us ? " Cook
asked regretfully.
" Just as soon as I can have a word
with Mr. Wright. This is n't the only
job I have on hand."
" Is that so ? "
" Don't you want to come in ? " Hart
asked abruptly. " I shall want a good
practical man in the office. How would
you like to run the new office ? "
Cook's manner froze into caution.
" Oh, I don't know. It 's pretty good
up here looking after Wright's business."
Hart picked up his sketch and turned
away.
" I thought you might like the chance.
Some of the men I knew in Paris may
join me, and I shan't have much trouble
in making up a good team."
Then he went out to his luncheon, and
when he returned, he shut himself up in
his box, stalking by Cook's desk without
a word. When he came forth again the
day's work was over, and the office force
had left. Cook was still dawdling over
his table.
" Say, Hart ! " he called out to the
architect. "I don't want you to have
the wrong idea about my refusing that
offer of yours. I don't mind letting you
know that I ain't fixed like most of the
boys. I 've got a family to look after,
my mother and sister and two kid bro-
thers. It is n't easy for us to pull along
on my pay, and I can't afford to take any
chances."
" Who 's asking you to take chances,
Cookey ? " Hart answered, mollified at
once. " Perhaps you might do well by
yourself."
"You see," Cook explained further,
" my sister 's being educated to teach, but
she 's got two years more at the Nor-
mal. And Will 's just begun high school.
Ed 's the only earner besides myself in
the whole bunch, and what he gets don't
count."
Thereupon the architect sat down on
the edge of the draughting - table in
friendly fashion and talked freely of his
plans. He hinted at the work for Graves
and at his prospects with the railroad.
" I have ten thousand dollars in the
bank, anyway. That will keep the office
going some time. And I don't mind tell-
ing you that I have something at stake,
too," he added in a burst of confidence.
" I am going to be married."
The Common Lot.
355
Cook grinned sympathetically. It
pleased him vastly to be told of Hart's
engagement in this confidential way.
After some further talk the matter of the
new office was arranged between them
then and there. Cook agreed to look into
a new building that had just pushed its
head among the skyscrapers near the
Maramanoc, to see if there was anything
left that would answer their purposes.
As they were leaving the office, Hart
stopped, exclaiming, —
" I 've got to telephone ! Don't wait."
" That 's always the way," the
draughtsman replied. " You '11 be tele-
phoning most of the time, now, I ex-
pect ! "
The architect did not telephone to
Helen Spellman, however. He called up
his cousin's office to tell Wheeler that he
had concluded not to contest the will.
" And Everett," he said frankly, " I
guess I have made rather an ass of my-
self, telling you I was going to kick up
a row. I hope you won't say anything
about it."
The lawyer wondered what had
brought about this change of heart in his
cousin. Later, when the news of the en-
gagement reached him, he understood.
For he knew Helen, in a way better than
her lover did, — knew her as one knows
the desired and unattainable.
A few days later Wright reached the
office, and Hart told him of his plan to
start for himself, asking for an early
release because important business was
waiting for his entire attention.
Wright had arrived only that morn-
ing ; he was seated before his broad desk,
which was covered to the depth of sev-
eral inches with blue prints, typewritten
specifications, and unopened mail. He
had been wrestling with contractors and
clients every minute since he had entered
the office, and it was now late in the af-
ternoon.
" So you are going to try it for your-
self," he commented, a new wrinkle
gathering on his clouded brow. It oc-
curred to him that Hart might be merely
hinting politely for an advance in salary,
but he dismissed the thought. "Have
you had enough experience ? " he asked
bluntly.
" I '11 be likely to get some more ! "
Hart replied, irritated at the remark.
" I mean of the actual conditions under
which we have to build, — the contractors,
the labor market, and so on ? Of course
you can leave at once if you wish to. I
should n't want to stand in your light.
It is rather a bad time with Harmon
home sick. But we can manage some-
how. Cook is a pretty good man for al-
most everything. And we can draw on
the St. Paul office."
Hart murmured his regret at the incon-
venience of his departure, and Wright
said nothing for a few minutes. He re-
membered now that some one had told
him that Hart was drawing plans for
Mrs. Phillips. That had probably made
the young architect ambitious to start for
himself. He felt that Hart should have
asked his consent before undertaking this
outside work. At least it would have
been more delicate to do so. But Wright
was a kindly man, and bore no malice.
In what he said next to the young archi-
tect he was moved by pure good will.
" I don't want to discourage you, Hart,
but I know what sort of luck young fel-
lows, the best of them, have these days
when they start a new office. It 's fierce
work getting business, here especially."
"I suppose so," Hart admitted con-
ventionally.
" The fine art side of the profession
don't count much with client or contrac-
tor. It 's just a tussle all the time ! " he
sighed, reflecting how he had spent two
hours of his morning in trying to con-
vince a wealthy client of the folly of cut-
ting down construction cost from fifty to
thirty cents a cubic foot.
"You young fellows just over from
the other side don't realize what it means
to run an office. If you succeed, you
356
The Common Lot.
have no time to think of your sketches,
except after dinner or on the train, may-
be. And if you don't succeed, you have
to grab at every little job to earn enough
to pay office expenses."
Hart's blank face did not commit him
to this wisdom.
" The only time I ever had any real
fun was when I was working for the old
firm, in New York. God ! I did some
pretty good things then. Old man Post
used to trim me down when I got out of
sight of the clients, but he let me have
all the rope he could. And now, — why,
it 's you who have the fun ! "
" And you who trim me down ! " Hart
retorted, with a grim little smile.
"Well, perhaps. I have to keep an
eye on all you Paris fellows. You come
over here well trained, damned well
trained, — we can't do anything like it
in this country, — but it takes a few
years for you to forget that you are n't
in la belle France. And some never get
over their habit of making everything
French Renaissance. You are n't flexi-
ble. Some of you are n't creative — I
mean," he said, getting warm on a favor-
ite topic, "you don't feel the situation
here. You copy. You try to express
everything just as you were taught. You
have got to feel things for yourself, by
thunder ! "
Hart kept his immobile face. It did
not interest him to know what Wright
thought of the Beaux Arts men. Yet
he had no intention of falling out with
Wright, who was one of the leading ar-
chitects of the country, and whose con-
nection might be valuable to him.
" I see you don't care to have me
preach," the older man concluded hu-
morously. " And you know your own
business best."
The Powers Jackson educational be-
quest meant that there would be a chance
for some one to do a large public build-
ing. Probably the family interests had
arranged to put this important piece of
work into Hart's hands. Wright hoped
for the sake of his art that the trustees
would put off building until the young
architect had developed more indepen-
dence and firmness of standard than he
had yet shown.
" I think I understand a little better
than I did two years ago what it takes
to succeed here in Chicago," Hart re-
marked at last.
Wright shot a piercing glance at him
out of his tired eyes.
" It means a good many different
kinds of things," the older man said slow-
ly. " Just as many in architecture as else-
where. It is n't the firm that is putting
up the most expensive buildings that is
always making the biggest success, by a
long shot."
" I suppose not," Hart admitted.
And there the conversation lapsed.
The older man felt the real impossibility
of piercing the young architect's manner,
his imperturbability.
" He does n't like me," he said to
himself reproachfully.
For he would have liked to say some-
thing to the younger man out of his twen-
ty years of experience, something con-
cerning the eternal conflict there is in all
the professions between a man's ideals of
his work and the practical possibilities in
the world we have about us ; something,
too, concerning the necessity of yield-
ing to the brute facts of life and yet not
yielding everything. But he had learned
the great truth that talk never saves a
man from his fate, especially that kind
of talk. A man lives up to what there
is in him, and Jackson Hart would follow
the rule.
So he dug his hands into the letters
on his desk, and said by way of conclu-
sion : —
" Perhaps we can throw some things
your way. There 's a little job, now."
He held up a letter he had just glanced
at. " They want me to recommend some
one to build a clubhouse at Oak Hills.
There is n't much in it. They can't
spend but seven thousand dollars. But
The Common Lot.
357
I had rather take that than do some
other things ! "
"Thank you," Hart replied with con-
siderable animation. " Of course I want
every chance I can get."
He took the letter from Wright's out-
stretched hand.
IX.
After the few swift months of spring
and summer they were to be married,
late in the fall.
Above the lake at Forest Park, in a
broad, open field, Mrs. Phillips's great
house had already risen. It was judged
variously by those who had seen it, but
it altogether pleased the widow ; and the
architect regarded it — the first work
of his manhood — with complacency and
pride. Helen had not seen it since the
walls had passed the first story. Then,
one day late in September, the architect
and she made the little journey from the
city, and walked over to the house from
the Shoreham station, up the lake road.
It was a still, soft fall day, with all
the mild charm of late summer that
comes only in this region. The leaves
still clung in bronzed masses to the little
oaks ; a stray maple leaf dipped down,
now and then, from a gaudy yellow tree,
and sailed like a bird along their path.
There was a benediction in the country,
before the dissolution of winter. The
girl's heart was filled with joy.
" If we could only live here, Francis ! "
" All the year ? " he queried doubt-
fully.
" Yes, always. Even the worst days
I should not feel lonely. I shall never
feel lonely again, anyway."
As he drew her hand close to his
breast, he said contentedly, with a large
view of their future : —
" Perhaps we can before long. But
land is very dear. Then you, have to
keep horses and servants, if you want to
live in the country."
" Oh ! I did n't think of all that."
They walked slowly, very close to-
gether, neither one anxious to reach the
misty horizon, where, in a bed of opal-
escent gray, lay the beautiful lake. The
sunshine and the fruity odors of the
good earth, the tranquil vistas of bronze
oaks, set the woman brooding on her
nesting time, which was so close at hand.
And the man was thinking likewise, in
his way, of this coming event, anxiously,
yet with confidence. The plans for the
Graveland, the contractor's big apart-
ment house, were already nearly finished.
New work must come to the office.
There were the Rainbows, who had
moved to Shoreham, having made a sud-
den fortune. And Raymond, the rail-
road man, on whose good will he counted,
with Mrs. Phillips's assistance.
Suddenly the house shot up before
their eyes, big and new in all the rawness
of fresh brick and stone. It towered
blusteringly above the little oaks, a great
red-brick chateau, with a row of little
round windows in its massive, thick-tiled
red roof.
Helen involuntarily stood still and
caught her breath. So this was his !
" Oh ! " she murmured. " Is n't it
big, Francis ! "
" It 's no three-room cottage," he an-
swered, with a little asperity.
Then he led her to the front, where
she could get the effect of the two wings,
the southerly terrace toward the lake,
the sweeping drive, and the classic en-
trance.
" I know I shall grow to like it, Fran-
cis," the girl said loyally. " It must be
very pretty inside, with those lovely
French windows ; and the brick court is
attractive, too."
She felt that she was hurting her
lover in his tenderest spot, and she tried
anxiously to find better words, to show
him that it was only her ignorance which
limited her appreciation. They strolled
about among the refuse heaps of the
builders, viewing the place at every angle.
Just as they were about to enter the
358
The Common Lot.
house, there came from the Shoreham
road the puffing of an automobile, and
presently Mrs. Phillips arrived in a large
touring car, with some people who had
been lunching with her at the Shoreham
Club. They came up to the house, talk-
ing and joking in a flutter of good-na-
tured comment. The architect recog-
nized the burly form of Colonel Ray-
mond. He was speaking : —
" Well, Louise, you will have to take
us all in next season. I didn't know
you were putting up a hotel like this."
" Hotel ! It is a perfect palace ! " ex-
claimed a short, plump woman who was
following close behind. " I hope you
are going to have a pergola. They 're
so nice. Every country house has a per-
gola nowadays."
" Why not an English garden and a
yew hedge ? " added a man who had on
the red coat of the Hunt Club. " I hope
you have got your stabling up to this,
Mrs. Phillips."
Then they recognized the architect and
Helen. Mrs. Phillips introduced them to
her friends, and they all went inside to
make a tour of the rooms. The painters,
who were rubbing the woodwork, looked
curiously at the invading party ; then,
with winks among themselves, turned in-
differently to their tasks. The visitors
burst into ripples of applause over the
hall with its two lofty stone fireplaces,
the long drawing-room that occupied the
south wing of the house, the octagonal
breakfast room and the dining-room in
the other wing. The architect led them
about, explaining the different effects he
had tried to get. He did it modestly,
touching lightly on architectural points
with a well-bred assumption that the vis-
itors knew all about such things. The
plump little woman followed close at his
heels, drinking in all that he said. Helen
wondered who she might be, until, in an
eddy of their- progress, Hart found a
chance to whisper to her, " It 's Mrs.
Rainbow ; she 's thinking of building."
He seemed very much excited about
this, and the general good luck of being
able to show these people over the house
he had made. After the first floor had
been exhausted, the party drifted up-
stairs in detachments. Helen could hear
her lover's pleasant voice as he led the
way from suite to suite above. The
voices finally centred in Mrs. Phillips's
bathroom, where the sunken marble bath,
the walls of colored marble, caused much
joking and laughter.
" Can you tell me where Mrs. Phillips
is ? " a voice sounded from the door.
Helen turned with a start. The young
girl who asked the question was dressed
in a riding habit. Outside on the drive
a small party of people were standing
with their horses. The girl spoke some-
what peremptorily, but before Helen had
time to reply, she added : —
" Are n't you Miss Spellman ? I am
Venetia Phillips."
Then the two smiled at each other in
the way of women who feel that they
may be friends. "I was off with my
uncle the day you dined with mamma,"
she continued, " so I missed seeing you.
Is n't this a great — barn, I was going
to say." She laughed and caught her-
self. " I did n't remember ! We have
just been out with the hounds, — the first
run. It 's too early to have a real hunt
yet. Do you ride ? "
They sat down on the great staircase
and were at once 'absorbed in each other.
In the meantime the party of visitors had
returned from the upper story by the
rear stairs, and were penetrating the mys-
teries of the service quarters. Hart was
showing them proudly all the little de-
vices for which American architecture is
famous, — the interior telephone service,
the laundry shoots, the electric dumb-
waiters, the electric driers. These de-
vices aroused Colonel Raymond's ad-
miration. When the others came back
to the hall he took the architect aside
and discussed driers earnestly. From
that they got to the heating system, which
necessitated a visit to the basement.
The Common Lot.
359
Mrs. Phillips took this occasion to say
to Helen : —
" You can be proud of your young man,
Miss Spellman. He 's done a very suc-
cessful piece of work. Every one likes it.
It 's all his, too," she added generously.
Helen found nothing to say in reply.
The widow was not an easy person for
her to talk to. On that other occasion
when they had met, in Mrs. Phillips's
city house, the two women had looked
into each other's eyes, and both had re-
mained cold. The meeting had not been
all that the architect had hoped for it.
So this time Mrs. Phillips examined
the younger woman critically, saying to
herself, " She 's a cold piece. She won't
hold him long ! "
At last the party gathered itself to-
gether and left. The big touring car
puffed up to the door, and the visitors
climbed in, making little final comments
of a flattering nature, to please the archi-
tect, who had charmed them all. He
was assiduous to the very end, laughing
at Mrs. Rainbow's joke about the marble
tub, which she repeated for the benefit
of those who had not been upstairs.
After Hart had helped her to mount
the steps of the car, she leaned over and
gave him her hand.
" So glad to have met you, Mr. Hart,"
she said with plump impressiveness. " I
am sure if we build, we '11 have to come
to you. It 's just lovely, everything."
" I shall have to give that away to
Rainbow," the colonel joked. " There 's
nothing so bad to eat up money as a good
architect."
Then he shook hands cordially with
Hart, lit a cigarette, and swung himself
to the seat beside Mrs. Phillips. After
the car had started, the riders mounted.
Hart helped Venetia Phillips to her seat,
and slipped in a word about the hunt.
But the girl leaned over on the other
side toward Helen, with a sudden en-
thusiasm.
" When you are married, can't I see
a lot of you ? "
Helen laughed, and the two held hands
for a moment, while the man in the red
coat talked with the architect.
When they had all gone, Jackson
turned to Helen, a happy smile of tri-
umph on his face.
" It seemed to take ! "
There had not been one word of com-
ment on the house itself, on the building
as a home for generations of people.
But Hart did not seem to notice that.
He was flushed with the exhilaration of
approval.
" Yes," Helen answered, throwing all
the animation she could into the words ;
" I think they all liked it."
She was silent, with many vague im-
pressions from the little incident of the
afternoon. There had been revealed to
her a new side of her lover, a worldly
side, which accorded with his alert air,
his well-trimmed mustache, and careful
attention to dress. He had been very
much at home with all these people ;
while she had felt more or less out of
her element. He knew how to talk to
them, how to please them, just as he
knew how to build a house after their
taste for luxury and display. He could
talk hunters or motor cars or bridge
whist, as the occasion demanded. He
was one of them in instinct !
She cast a timid look at the great
facade above them, over which the cold
shadows of the autumn evening were fast
stealing, leaving it still more hard and
new and raw. She was glad it was not
to be her fate to live there in all its
grandeur and stiff luxury.
The architect had to speak to the su-
perintendent of the building, and Helen
sat down on the stone balustrade of the
terrace to wait. The painters were leav-
ing their job, putting on their coats as
they hurried from the house. They
scarcely cast a glance her way as they
passed, disappear ing into the road, fleeing
from the luxurious abode and the silent
woods, which were not theirs, to the vil-
lage and the city. . . . This great Amer-
360
The Common Lot.
ican chateau was so different from what
she had always dreamed her lover would
build, this caravansary for the rich, this
toy where they could hide themselves in
aristocratic seclusion and take their plea-
sures. And the thought stole into her
mind that he liked it, this existence of
the rich and prosperous, their sports
and their luxuries, — and would want to
earn with his life their pleasures, their
housing, their automobiles, and hunters.
It was all strange to her experience, to
her dreams !
From the second floor there came the
sound of voices : —
" I tells you, Muster Hart, you got to
rip the whoal dam piping out from roof
to basement if you wants to have a good
yob of it. I tole you that way back six
weeks ago. It ware n't specified right
from the beginning."
" I '11 speak to Rollings about it to-
morrow and see what can be done."
" That 's what you say every time,"
the Swede growled.
" See here, Anderson ! Who 's run-
ning this job ? " . . .
The girl strolled away from the voices
toward the bluff, where she could see the
gray bosom of the lake. The twilight
trees, the waveless lake soothed her :
they were real, her world. The house
back there, the men and women of it,
were shadows on the marge.
" Nell ! " her lover called.
" Coming, Francis."
When he came up to her she rested
her head on his shoulder, looking at him
with vague longing, desiring to keep him
from something not clearly defined in
her own mind.
"We must hurry to get that train.
When we live out here we '11 have to
sport a motor car, won't we ? " he said
buoyantly.
She answered slowly, " I don't know
that I should want to live just here, after
all."
" Why, I thought you were crazy
about the country ! And I 've been
thinking it might be the very thing for
us to do. There 's such a lot of building
in these places now. Mrs. Phillips has
asked me several times why I didn't
move out here on the shore. Just before
she left she asked me if I did n't want
to build a lodge for her and take it for
a year or so. Of course that 's a joke.
But I know she 's bought a lot of pro-
perty on the bluff here, and might be
willing to let me have a small bit on rea-
sonable terms. She 's been so friendly
all along ! "
He was still in the flush of his triumph,
and talked rapidly of all that opened out
before his fervent ambition. Suddenly
he took note of her mood and said sharp-
ly, " Nell, you don't like her."
"Why do you say that?" she ex-
claimed, surprised in her inner thoughts.
" I don't really know."
" Why, it 's plain enough. You don't
talk to her. You are so cold ! And the
same way with Mrs. Rainbow."
" 0 Francis ! I did n't mean to be
cold. Ought I to like them if you are
to do work for them ? "
The architect laughed at her simpli-
city.
" Rich people always puzzle me," she
continued apologetically. " They always
have, except uncle Powers, and you never
thought of him as rich ! I don't feel as
if I knew what they liked. They are so
much preoccupied with their own affairs.
That other time when I met Mrs. Phil-
lips she was so much worried over the
breakfast room and the underbutler's
pantry ! What is an underbutler's pan-
try, Francis ? "
This raillery over the needs of the
rich seemed almost anarchistic to the
architect. They walked to the station
silently in the gathering darkness. But
after a time, on the train, he returned to
the events of the afternoon.
" She can do anything she likes with
Raymond. It would be a big stroke to
get that C. R. & N. business ! "
Helen made no reply to this observa-
The Common Lot.
361
tion, and they relapsed again into silent
thought.
The night before their marriage the
architect told her exultantly that he had
been sent for by Raymond's private sec-
retary to talk over work for the railroad
corporation.
"That's Mrs. Phillips's doing," he
told Helen. " You must remember to
say something to her about it to-mor-
row, if you get the chance. It 's likely
to be the biggest wedding present we '11
have ! "
"I am glad," Helen replied simply,
without further comment.
He thought that she did not compre-
hend what this good fortune meant.
And he was quite mystified when she re-
fused to see him again before the cere-
mony of the following day. He could
not realize that in some matters — a few
small matters — he had bruised the wo-
man's ideal of him ; he could not under-
stand why these last hours, before she
took him to her arms forever, she wished
to spend alone with her own soul in a
kind of prayer. . . .
There were only a few people present
at the marriage in the little Maple Street
house the next day. Many of their
fashionable friends were still away from
the city. Mrs. Phillips had made a
point of coming to the wedding, and after
much insistence she had been made to
bring Venetia, who had discovered a
sudden enthusiasm for weddings. Pem-
berton, an old friend of the Spellmans
who had recently been added to the Jack-
son trustees, was there, and also little
Cook, who was the backbone of the new
office. Everett Wheeler was the best
man. He and Hollister had put off their
yearly fishing trip to do honor to Jack-
son Hart, who had earned their approval,
because the young man had swallowed
his disappointment about the will and
was going to marry a poor girl. Hollis-
ter and Pemberton had brought Judge
Phillips with them, because he was in
town and liked weddings, and ought to
send the pair a goodly gift. Of the pre-
sence of all these and some others the
young architect was pleasantly conscious
that October morning.'
Only that morning, on the way to the
house, Everett had referred to the great
school, a monumental affair, which the
trustees would have to build some day.
It was in the aroma of this new prospect,
and of all the other good fortune that
had been his since he had taken up his
burden of poverty, that Jackson Hart
was married.
But the girl walked up to him to be
married, in a dream, unconscious of the
whole world, with a mystery of love in
her heart. When the ceremony was
over, she looked up into her husband's
resolute face, which was slightly flushed
with excitement. Venetia, standing by
her uncle's side a few steps away, could
see tears in the bride's eyes, and the girl
wondered.
Did Helen know now that the man
who stood there face to face with her, her
husband, was yet a stranger to her soul ?
She raised her lips swiftly to him, and
he bowed his head to kiss her, there be-
fore all.
X.
After a winter in the city the Harts
went to live at Shoreham, taking rooms
for the season at the club. The new
station which the railroad was building
at Eversley Heights, and the Rainbows'
cottage on the ridge just west of the
club, had brought the architect consid-
erable reputation. His acquaintance was
growing rapidly among the men who rode
to and fro each day on the suburban
trains of the C. R. & N. It was the
kind of acquaintance which he realized
might be very valuable to him in his
profession.
Between Chicago and Shoreham, the
northernmost of the long line of pros-
perous suburbs, there lay a considerable
362
The Common Lot.
variety of American society. As the
train got away from the sprawling out-
skirts of the city, each stop marked a
pause in social progress. Each town
gathered to itself its own class, which
differed subtly, but positively, from that
attracted by its neighbor. Shoreham
was the home of the hunting set, its so-
ciety centring in the large club. At
Popover Plains there was a large sum-
mer hotel, and therefore the society of
Popover Plains was considered by her
neighbors as more or less " mixed."
Eversley Heights was still undeveloped,
the home of a number of young people,
who were considered very pleasant, even
incipiently smart. But of all the more
distant and desirable settlements Forest
Park had the greatest pride in itself, be-
ing comparatively old, and having large
places and old-fashioned ugly houses in
which lived some people of permanent
wealth. All these suburban towns had
one common characteristic : they were
the homes of the prosperous, who had
emerged from the close struggle in the
city with ideals of rest and refreshment
and an instinct for the society of their
own kind. Except for a street of shops
near the stations, to which was relegated
the service element of life, the inhabit-
ants got exclusively the society of their
kind.
The architect went to the city by one
of the earlier trains and came back very
late. He had all the labor of superin-
tending the construction of his buildings,
for the work in the office did not warrant
engaging a superintendent. He emerged
from the city, after a day spent in run-
ning about here and there, with a kind
of speechless listlessness, which the wife
of a man in business soon becomes ac-
customed to. The dinner in the lively
dining-room of the clubhouse, with the
chatter about sport and the gossip, the
cigar afterwards on the veranda over-
looking the green, turfy valley golden in
the afterglow of sunset, refreshed him
quickly. He was always eager to accept
any invitation, to go wherever they were
asked, to have himself and his wife in
the eyes of their little public as much as
possible. His agreeable manners, his
keen desire to please, his instinct for the
conventional, the suitable, made him
much more popular than his wife, who
was considered shy, if not positively
countrified. As the season progressed,
Hart was sure that they had made a wise
choice of a place to settle in, and they
began to look for a house.
In spite of all the apparent prosperity
which the little office enjoyed from the
start, the profit for the first year was
startlingly small. The commission from
the Phillips house had long since been
eaten ; also as much of the fee from
Graves as that close contractor could be
induced to pay over before the building
had been finished. The insatiable office
was now devouring the profits from the
railroad business. When Cook saw the
figures, he spoke to the point : — "It 's
just self-indulgence to build houses. We
must quit." If they were to succeed,
they must do a larger business, — fac-
tories, mills, hotels, — work that could
be handled on a large scale, roughly and
rapidly.
The Harts were living beyond their
means, not extravagantly, but with a
constant deficit, which from the earliest
weeks of their marriage had troubled
Helen. Reared in the tradition of thrift,
she held it to be a crime to spend money
not actually earned. But she found that
her husband had another theory of do-
mestic economy. To attract money, he
said, one must spend it. He insisted on
her dressing as well as the other women
who used the club, although they were
for the most part wives and daughters
of men who had many times his income.
At the close of the first six months of
their marriage venture Helen spoke au-
thoritatively : —
" At this rate we shall run behind at
least two thousand dollars. We must go
back to the city to live ! "
The Common Lot.
363
They had been talking of renting a
house in Forest Park. But she knew
that in the city she could control the ex-
penditure, the manner of living. The
architect laughed at her scruples.
" I '11 see Bushfield to-day and find out
when they are to get at the Popover sta-
tion."
She still looked grave, having in mind
a precept that young married people, bar-
ring sickness, should save a fifth of their
income.
" And if that is n't enough," her hus-
band added, " why, we must pull out
something else. There 's lots doing ! "
He laughed again, and kissed her be-
fore going downstairs to take the club
'bus. His light-hearted philosophy did
not reassure her. If one's income was
not enough for one's wants, he said, —
why, expand the income ! This hopeful,
gambling American spirit was natural to
him. He was too young to realize that
the point of expansion for professional
men was definitely limited. A lawyer,
a doctor, an architect, had but his one
brain, his one pair of hands, his own
eyes, — and the scope of these organs
was fixed by nature.
" And we give so little ! " she protested
in her heart that morning. Her mother
had given to their church and to certain
charities always a tenth of their small
income. That might be a mechanical,
old-fashioned method of estimating one's
dues to mankind, but it was better than
the careless way of giving when it oc-
curred to one, or when some friend who
could not be denied demanded help. . . .
The architect, as he rode to the early
morning train in the club 'bus, was talk-
ing to Stephen Lane, a rich bachelor, who
had a large house and was the chief pro-
moter of the Hunt Club. Lane grum-
bled rather ostentatiously because he was
obliged to take the early train, having
had news that a mill he was interested
in had burned down overnight.
" You are going to rebuild ? " the ar-
chitect asked.
" Begin as soon as we can get the plans
done," Lane replied laconically.
It shot into the architect's mind that
here was the opportunity which would
go far to wipe out the deficit he and
Helen had been talking about. With
this idea in view he got into the smoking
car with Lane, and the two men talked
all the way to town. Hart did not like
Stephen Lane; few at the club cared
for the rich bachelor, whose manners
carried a self-consciousness of wealth.
But this morning the architect looked at
him from a different angle, and condoned
his tone of patronage. As the train
neared the tangled network of the city
terminal, he ventured to say, " What
architects do your work ? "
He hated the sound of his voice as he
said it, though he tried to make it im-
personal and indifferent. Lane's voice
seemed to change its tone, something of
suspicion creeping in.
" I have always had the Stearns bro-
thers. They do that sort of thing pretty
well."
As they mounted the station stairs,
Lane asked casually, " Do you ever do
that kind of work ? It is n't much in
your line."
" I 've never tried it. But of course
I should like the chance ! "
Then Lane, one hand on the door of
a waiting cab, remarked slowly, " Well,
we '11 talk it over, perhaps. Where do
you lunch ? " and gave the architect two
fingers of his gloved hand.
He was thinking that Mrs. Hart was
a pleasant woman, who always listened
to him with a certain deference. And
these Harts must be hard put to it, with-
out old Jackson's pile.
Hart went his way on foot, a taste of
something little agreeable in his mouth.
He had to stop at the railroad offices to
see the purchasing agent.
The railroad did its own contracting,
naturally, and it was through this man
Bushfield that the specifications for the
buildings had to pass. The architect had
364
The Common Lot.
had many dealings with the purchasing
agent, and had found him always friend-
ly. This morning Bushfield was already
in his office, perspiring from the July
heat, his coat off, a stenographer at his
elbow. When Hart came in he looked
up slowly, and nodded. After he had fin-
ished with the stenographer, he asked, —
" Why do you specify Star cement at
Eversley, Hart ? "
" Oh, it 's about the best. We always
specify Star for outside work."
" How 's it any better than the Cli-
max ? " the purchasing agent asked in-
sistently.
"I don't know anything about the
Climax. What 's the matter with Star ? "
Bushfield scratched his chin thought-
fully for a moment.
" I have n't got anything against Star.
What I want to know is what you have
got against Climax ? "
The smooth guttural tones of the pur-
chasing agent gave the architect no cause
for suspicion, and he was dull enough not
to see what was in the air.
" It would take time to try a new ce-
ment properly," he answered.
The purchasing agent picked up his
morning cigar, rolled it around in his
mouth, and puffed before he replied : —
" I don't mind telling you that it means
something to me to have Climax used at
Eversley. It's just as good as any ce-
ment on the market. I give you my
word for that. I take it you 're a good
friend of mine. I wish you would see
if you can't use the Climax."
Then they talked of other matters.
When Hart got back to the office he
looked up the Climax cement in a trade
catalogue. There were hundreds of
brands on the market, and the Climax was
one of the newest. Horace Bushfield, he
reflected, was Colonel Raymond's son-in-
law. If he wished to do the Popover
station, he should remain on good terms
with the purchasing agent of the road.
Some time that day he got out the type-
written specifications for the railroad
work, and in the section on the cement
work he inserted neatly in ink the words,
" Or a cement of equal quality approved
by the architect."
Not many days later the purchasing
agent telephoned to him : —
" Say, Hart, the Buckeye Hardware
people have just had a man in here see-
ing me about the hardware for that build-
ing. I see you have specified the For-
rest makes. Are n't the Buckeye people
first-class ? "
The architect, who knew what was
coming this time, waited a moment be-
fore replying. Then he answered coolly,
" I think they are, Bushfield."
" Well, the Buckeye people have al-
ways done our business, and they could
n't understand why they were shut out
by your specifying the Forrest makes.
You '11 make that all right ? So long."
As Hart hung up his telephone, he
would have liked to write Raymond, the
general manager, that he wanted nothing
more to do with the railroad business.
Some weeks later when he happened
to glance over the Buckeye Company's
memoranda of sales for the Eversley sta-
tion, and saw what the railroad had paid
for its hardware, he knew that Horace
Bushfield was a thief. But they were
talking of the Popover station then.
Something similar had been his expe-
rience with the contractor Graves.
" Put me up a good, showy building,"
the contractor had said, when they dis-
cussed the design. " That 's the kind
that will take in that park neighborhood.
People nowadays want a stylish home
with elevator boys in uniform. . . . That
court you 've got there between the wings,
and the little fountain, and the grand
entrance, — all just right. But they
don't want to pay nothin' for their style.
Flats don't rent for anything near what
they do in New York. Out here they
want the earth for fifty, sixty dollars a
month ; and we got to give 'em the near-
est thing to it for their money."
The Common Lot.
365
So, when it came to the structure of
the building, the contractor ordered the
architect to save expense in every line
of the details. The woodwork was cut
to the thinnest veneer ; partitions, even
bearing-walls, were made of the cheapest
studding the market offered ; the large
floors were hung from thin outside walls,
without the brick bearing-walls provided
by the architect. When Hart murmured
Graves said frankly : —
" This ain't any investment proposi-
tion, my boy. I calculate to fill the
Graveland in two months, and then I '11
trade it off to some countryman who is
looking for an investment. Put all the
style you want into the finish. Have
some of the flats Flemish, and others Co-
lonial, and so on. Make 'em smart."
The architect tried to swallow his dis-
gust at being hired to put together such
a flimsy shell of plaster and lath. But
Cook, who had been trained in Wright's
office, where work of this grade was never
accepted, was in open revolt.
" If it gets known around that this is
the style of work we do in this office,
it '11 put us in a class, and it ain't a plea-
sant one, either. . . . Say, Jack, how 's
this office to be run, — first-class or the
other class ? "
" You know, man," the architect re-
plied, " how I am fixed with Graves. I
don't like this business any better than
you do, but we '11 be through with it be-
fore long."
He growled in his turn to the contrac-
tor, who received his protest with con-
temptuous good humor.
" You 'd better take a look at what
other men are doing, if you think I am
making the Graveland such an awful
cheap building. I tell you, there ain't
money in the other kind. Why, I worked
for a man once who put up a first-class
flat building, slow-burning construction,
heavy woodwork, and all that. It 's old-
fashioned by this time, and its rents are
way down. And I saw by the paper the
other day that it was sold at the sher-
iff's sale for not more than what my bill
came to ! What have you got to say to
that ? "
Therefore the architect dismissed the
Graveland from his mind as much as he
could, and saw little of it while it was
under construction, for the contractor did
his own superintending. One day, how-
ever, he had occasion to go to the build-
ing, and took his wife with him. They
drove down the vast waste of Grand
Boulevard ; after passing through that
wilderness of painful fancies, the lines of
the Graveland made a very pleasant im-
pression.
Hart had induced Graves to sacrifice
part of his precious land to an interior
court, around which he had thrown his
building like a miniature chateau, thus
shutting out the sandy lots, the ragged
street, which looked like a jaw with teeth
knocked out at irregular intervals. A
heavy wall joined the two wings on the
street side, and through the iron gates
the Park could be seen, just across the
street.
" Lovely ! " Helen exclaimed. " I 'm
so glad you did it! I like it so — so
much more than the Phillips house."
They studied it carefully from the car-
riage, and Hart pointed out all the little
triumphs of design. It was, as Helen
felt, much more genuine than the Phillips
house. It was no bungling copy, but an
honest answer to a modern problem, —
an answer, to be sure, in the only lan-
guage that the architect knew.
Helen wanted to see the interior, al-
though Jackson displayed no enthusiasm
over that part of the work. And in the
inside came the disaster ! The evidences
of the contractor's false, flimsy building
darkened the architect's brow.
" The scamp ! " he muttered, emerg-
ing from the basement. " He 's propped
the whole business on a dozen or so ' two-
by-fours.' And he 's put in the rotten-
est plumbing underground that I ever
saw. I don't believe it ever had an in-
spection."
366
The Common Lot.
" Show me what you mean," Helen
demanded.
He pointed out to her some of the de-
vices used to skimp the building.
" Even the men at work here know it.
You can see it by the way they look at
me. Why, the thing is a paper box ! "
In some of the apartments the rough
work was scarcely completed ; in others
the plasterers were at work ; but the
story was the same everywhere.
" I can't see how he escaped the Build-
ing Department. He 's violated the or-
dinances again and again. But I sup-
pose he 's got the inspectors in his pay ! "
He remembered the Canostota : he had
no manner of doubt, now, about those
I-beams in the Canostota !
" Francis ! " Helen exclaimed with
sudden passion ; " you won't stand it !
You won't let him do this kind of
thing?"
The architect shrugged his shoulders.
" It 's his building. He bought the
plans and paid for them."
She was silent, troubled in her mind
by this business tangle, but convinced
that some wrong was being done. A
thing like this, a fraud upon the public,
should be prevented in some way.
" Can't you tell him that you will re-
port him to the Building Department ? "
she asked finally.
Hart smiled at her impetuous unprac-
ticality.
" That would hardly do, would it, to
go back on a client like that ? It 's none
of my business, really. Only one hates
to feel that his ideas are wasted on such
stuff as this is made of. The city should
look after it. And it 's no worse than
most of these flat buildings. Look at
that one across the street. It 's the same
cheap thing. I was in there the other
day. . . . No, it 's the condition of things
in this city, — the worst place for good
building in the country. Every one says
so. But God help the poor devils who
come to live here, if a fire once gets
started in this plaster-and-lath shell ! "
He turned to the entrance and kicked
open the door. His wife's face was pale
and set, as if she could not dismiss the
matter thus lightly.
" I never thought of fire ! " she mur-
mured. " Francis, if anything like that
should happen ! To think that you had
drawn the plans ! "
" Oh ! it may last out its time," he re-
plied reassuringly. " And it does n't
affect the appearance of the building at
present. It 's real smart, as Mrs. Rain-
bow would say. Don't you think so,
Nell ? "
She had turned her back to the plea-
sant facade of the Graveland, and was
staring into the Park across the street.
She turned around at his words and cast
a swift, scrutinizing glance "over the build-
ing.
" It is n't right ! I see fraud looking out
of every window. It 's just a skeleton
covered with cloth."
The architect laughed at her solem-
nity. He was disgusted with it himself ;
it offended his workman's conscience.
But he was too modern, too practical, to
allow merely ideal considerations to upset
him. And, after all, in his art, as in
most arts, the effect of the thing was two
thirds the game. With her it was alto-
gether different. Through all outward
aspect, or cover, of things pierced their in-
ner being, from which one could not es-
cape by illusion.
As they, were getting away from the
building, the contractor drove up to the
Graveland for his daily inspection. He
came over to the architect, a most affable
smile on his bearded face.
"Mrs. Hart, I presume," he said, smil-
ing. " Looking over your husband's
work ? It 's fine, fine, I tell you. Be-
tween ourselves it beats Wright all out."
Helen's stiffness of manner did not
encourage cordiality. Graves, thinking
her snobbish, bowed to them, and went
into the building.
" You '11 never do anything for him
again, will you, Francis ? Promise me ! "
The Common Lot.
367
And he promised lightly enough, for
he thought it highly improbable that the
contractor ever would return to him, or
that he should feel obliged to take his
work if he offered it.
Nevertheless, the contractor did return
to the office, and not long afterwards. It
was toward the end of the summer, when
the architect and his wife were still de-
bating the question of taking a house in
the country for the winter. One after-
noon Hart returned from his luncheon to
find Graves waiting for him in the outer
office. The stenographer and Cook were
hard at work in the room beyond, with
an air of having nothing to say to the
contractor. As Graves followed Hart
into his private office, Cook looked up
with a curl on his thin lips that expressed
the fullness of his heart.
" Say," Graves called out as soon as
Hart had closed the door to the outer
room, " I sold that Graveland a month
ago, almost before the plaster was dry.
A man from Detroit came in to see me
one morning, and we made the deal that
day."
" Is that so ? " Hart remarked coolly.
" It was a pretty -building. I knew I
should n't have any trouble with it. Now
I have something new in mind."
Hart listened in a non-committal man-
ner.
" Part of that trade with the Detroit
feller was for a big block of land out west
here a couple of miles. I am thinking
of putting up some tidy little houses to
sell on the installment plan."
" What do you mean to put into
them ? " the architect asked bluntly.
" Well, they 'd ought to sell for not
more than eight thousand dollars."
"And cost as much less as you can
make them hold together for ? I don't
believe I can do anything for you, Mr.
Graves," the architect replied firmly.
" Is that so ? Well, you are the first
architect I ever saw who was too busy
to take on a paying piece of business."
He sat down more firmly in the chair
opposite Hart's desk, and he began to de-
scribe his scheme. There was to be a
double row of houses, three stories and
basement, each one different in style, in
a different kind of brick or terra cotta,
with a distinguishing " feature " worked
in somewhere in the design. They were
to be bait for the thrifty clerk, who want-
ed to buy a permanent home on the install-
ment plan rather than pay rent. There
were many similar building schemes in
different parts of the city, the advertise-
ments of which one might read in the
street cars.
" Why do you want me to do the
job ? " Hart asked at last. " Any boy
just out of school could do what you
are after."
" No, he could n't. He has n't the
knack of giving a fresh face to each
house. It won't be hard work for
you ! »
This, the architect knew, was very true.
It would be very easy to have Cook hunt
up a lot of photographs from French
and English architectural journals, which,
with a little arrangement, would serve.
With a few hours' work he could turn
out that individual fagade that Graves
prized commercially. Here was the
large job that could be done easily and
roughly, ready to hand.
"I don't like to have such work go
through the office. That 's all there is.
about it ! " he exclaimed at last.
" Tony, eh ? Well, we won't fight over
that. Suppose you make the sketches
and let another feller prepare the de-
tails ? "
There were many objections to this
mode of operation, but the contractor
met every one. Hart himself thought
of Van Meyer, a clever, drunken Ger-
man, to whom he had given work now
and then when the office was busy. He
would do what he was told and say no-
thing about it. ...
It was late when Graves left the of-
fice. Cook and the stenographer had
368
The Common Lot.
already gone. Hart went down into
the street with the contractor, and they
nodded to each other when they parted,
in the manner of men who have reached
an understanding. On the way to the
train, Hart dropped into his club for a
drink. He stood staring into the street
while he sipped his gin and bitters.
The roar of the city as it came through
the murky windows seemed to him more
than commonly harsh and grating. The
gray light of the summer evening filtered
mournfully into the dingy room. . . .
He was not a weak man ; he had no
qualms of conscience for what he had
made up his mind that afternoon to do.
It was disagreeable, but he had weighed
it against other disagreeable alternatives
which might happen if he could not get the
money he needed. By the time he had
reached Shoreham he had entirely ad-
justed his mind to Graves, and he met his
wife, who had walked over to the station,
with his usual buoyant smile. And that
evening he remarked : —
" I guess we had better take the Lor-
ing place. It 's the only fit one for rent.
We '11 have to keep a horse, — that 's all."
They had been debating this matter
of the Loring house for several weeks.
It was a pleasant old house, near the
lake, not far from Mrs. Phillips's in For-
est Park. It was Mrs. Phillips who had
first called the architect's attention to it.
But, unfortunately, it was too far from
either station of the railroad to be within
walking distance. And it was a large
establishment for two young persons to
maintain, who were contemplating the
advent of a baby and a nurse.
All this Helen had pointed out to her
husband, and lately they had felt too
poor to consider the Loring place.
" What has happened, Francis ? " she
asked.
" A lot more business has come in, —
houses. They will be very profitable,"
he answered vaguely, remembering
Helen's antipathy to the contractor.
" Did you lunch with Venetia? "
XI.
The Lady Venetia de Phillips, as the
young woman used to call herself in the
doll age, had never set foot in a common
street car, or, indeed, in anything more
public than a day coach on the Forest
Park suburban train ; and in that only
because the C. R. & N. had not found
it profitable to provide as yet a special
coach for her class. Mrs. Phillips, who
had known what it was to ride in an Ot-
tumwa buggy, comfortably cushioned by
the stout arm of an Ottumwa swain, un-
derstood the cardinal principle of class
evolution, which is separation. She had
educated her children according to that
principle.
So it happened shortly before Mrs.
Phillips had taken possession of her new
home that Miss Phillips, having to pay
a visit on the North Side of the city, was
driving in her mother's victoria, in dig-
nity, according to her estate. Beside
her sat her favorite terrier, Pete, scan-
ning the landscape of the dirty streets
by which they were obliged to pass from
the South to the North Side. Sudden-
ly as the carriage turned a corner, Pete
spied a long, lank wharf rat, of a kind
that did not inhabit his own neighbor-
hood. The terrier took one impulsive
leap between the wheels of the victoria,
and was off up Illinois Street after the
rat. It was a good race ; the Lady
Venetia's sporting blood rose, and she
ordered the coachman to follow. Sud-
denly there dashed from an alley a light
baker's wagon, driven by a reckless
youth. Pete, unmindful of the clatter-
ing wagon;* intent upon his loping prey,
was struck full in the middle of his body :
two wheels passed diagonally across him,
squeezing him to the pavement like
india-rubber ball. He dragged hi
to the sidewalk, filling the street wi
hideous howls. The passers-by stoppe
but the reckless youth in the baker
wagon, having leaned out to see wh
The Common Lot.
369
damage had been done, grinned, shook
his reins, and was off.
Before the coachman had brought the
victoria to a full stop Venetia was out
and across the street. Pete had crawled
into an alley, where he lay in a little
heap, moaning. When his mistress tried
to gather him into her skirt he whim-
pered and showed his teeth. Something
was radically wrong ! The small boys
who had gathered advised throwing Pete
into the river, and offered to do the deed.
But Venetia, the tears falling from her
eyes, turned back into the street to take
counsel with the coachman. A young
man who was hurrying by, swinging a
little satchel and whistling to himself,
stopped.
' " What 'a up ? " he asked, smiling at
the girl's tears.
Venetia pointed at the dog, and the
stranger, pushing the small boys aside,
leaned over Pete.
" Gee ! He 's pretty well mashed,
ain't he ? Here, Miss, I '11 give him a
smell of this and send him to by-by."
He opened his little satchel and hunt-
ed for a bottle. Venetia timidly touched
his arm.
" Please don't kill him ! "
" That 's just what I 'm going to do,
sure thing ! " He paused, with the little
vial in his hand, and looked coolly at the
girl. " You don't want the pup to suffer
like that?"
" But can't he be saved ? "
The stranger looked again at Pete,
then back at Venetia. Finally he tied
a handkerchief over the dog's mouth, and
began to examine him carefully.
" Let 's see what there '» left of you
after the mix-up, Mr. Doggie. We '11
give you the benefit of our best atten-
tion and skill, — more 'n most folks ever
get in this world, — because you are the
pet of a nice young lady. .If you were
just an alley-cat you would n't even get
the chloroform. Well, Miss, he 'd have
about one chance in a hundred, after he
had that hind leg cut off."
VOL. xcm. — NO. 557. 24
" Could you cure him ? Mamma will
be very glad to pay you for your ser-
vices."
" Is that so ? " the stranger remarked.
" How do you know that my services
don't come very high ? Well, come on,
pup ! We '11 see what can be done for
you."
Drawingtheimprovised muzzle tighter,
he gathered Pete up in a little bundle.
Then he strode down the street to the
west. The coachman drew up beside
the curb and touched his hat.
" Won't you get in ? " Venetia asked.
" It 's only a step or so to my place,"
he answered gruffly. " You can follow
me in the carriage."
But she kept one hand on Pete, and
walked beside the stranger until he
stopped at an old, one-story, wooden cot-
tage. Above the door was painted in
large black letters, " S. COBUKN, M. D.
PHYSICIAN AND SURGEON."
" May I come in ? " the girl asked
timidly.
" Sure ! Why would I keep you sit-
ting on the doorstep ? "
Inside there was a little front room,
apparently used as a waiting-room for
patients. Back of this was a large bare
room, into which the doctor led the way.
It occupied all the rest of the cottage.
A wooden bench extended the entire
length of this room, underneath a row of
rough windows, which had been cut in
the wall to light the bench. Over in
one corner was a cot, with the bed-
clothes negligently dragging on the floor.
Near by was an iron sink. On a table
in the centre of the room, carefully
guarded by a glass case, was a complex
piece of mechanism which looked to the
girl like one of the tiresome machines
her teacher of physics was wont to ex-
hibit.
" My laboratory," the doctor explained
somewhat grandly.
Venetia stepped gingerly across the
dirty floor, glancing about with curios-
ity. The doctor placed the dog on the
370
The Common Lot.
table, and turned on several electric
lights.
" You '11 have to help at this perform-
ance," the doctor remarked, taking off
his coat.
Together they gave Pete an opiate
and removed the muzzle. The doctor
then turned him over and poked him
here and there.
" Well," he pronounced, " Peter has
a full bill. Compound fracture, broken
rib, and mashed toes. And I don't know
what all on the inside. He has a slim
chance of limping around on three legs.
Shall I give him some more dope ? What
do you say ? "
" Pete was a gamy dog," Venetia re-
plied thoughtfully. " I think he would
like all his chances."
" Good ! " The doctor tossed aside
the sponge that he had held ready to give
Pete his farewell whiff. He told the
girl how to hold the dog, and how to
touch the sponge to his nose from time
to time. They were absorbed in the
operation when the coachman pushed his
way into the room.
"What shall I do, Miss, about the
horses ? Mis' Phillips gave particler
instructions I was n't to stay out after
five-thurty. It 's most that now."
" Tell him to go home," the doctor
ordered. " We '11 be an hour more/'
" But how shall I get home ? " the
girl asked, perplexed.
" On your feet, I guess, same as most
folks," the doctor answered, testing a
knife on his finger. " And the cars ain't
stopped running on the South Side, have
they?"
" I don't know. I never use them,"
Venetia replied helplessly.
The doctor put the knife down beside
Pete, and looked at the girl from her
head to her feet, a teasing smile creeping
over his swarthy face.
" Well, it 's just about time for you to
find out what they 're good for. I '11 take
you home myself just to see how you like
them. You won't get hurt, not a bit.
You may go, Thomas ! " He waved his
hand sarcastically to the coachman.
" And when you go out, be good enough
to slip the latch. We have a little busi-
ness to do here, and don't want to
interrupted."
When the coachman had left, Venetia
turned to the doctor with a red face, and
copying her mother's most impressive
tones, asked, —
" What would you like me to do now,
Dr. C oburn ? "
" Nothing special. Turn your back
if you don't like to see me take a chop
out of doggie."
He laughed at her dignity ; therefore
she kept her face turned resolutely on
poor Pete. She could not help being
interested in the man as she watched his
swift movements. He was stocky and
short, black-haired, with a short black
mustache that did not disguise the perpet-
ual sardonic smile of his lips. She noticed
that his trousers were very baggy and
streaked at the bottoms with mud. They
were the trousers of a man who, according
to her experience, was not a gentleman.
The frayed cravat, which showed its
cotton filling, belonged to the same cate-
gory as the trousers. But there was
something in the fierce black eyes, the
heavy jaw, the nervous grip of the lips
when the man was thinking, that awed
her. The more Venetia looked at him,
the more she was afraid of him ; not
afraid that he would do any harm to
her, but vaguely afraid of his strength,
his force. His bare arms were thick and
hairy, although the fingers were supple,
and he touched things lightly. Alto-
gether he was a strange person in her
little world, and somewhat terrifying.
Dr. Coburn talked all the time, whil<
he worked swiftly over the dog, descril
ing to the girl just what he was doing.
Venetia watched him without flinchinj
though the tears would roll down h<
face. She put one hand under Pete's
limp head to hold it, as she would have
liked to have her head held under the
The Common Lot.
371
same circumstances. At last the doctor
straightened himself and exclaimed : —
" Correct ! He 's done up in first-class
style." He went to the sink and washed
his arms and hands. " Yes, Peter is as
well patched as if the great Dr. Parks
had done it himself and charged you ten
thousand dollars for the job. I donno'
but it 's better done. And he would have
charged you all right ! " He gave a loud
ironical laugh, and swashed the water
over his bare arms.
Then he came back to the operating
table, wiping his hands and arms on a
roller towel that was none too clean.
" You can quit that sponge now, Miss,
and I guess doggie won't appreciate the
little attention of holding his head yet a
while. He has n't got to the flower and
fruit stage yet, have you, eh, purp ? "
Venetia stood like a little girl, awk-
wardly waiting for orders.
" What 's your name ? " the doctor
demanded abruptly.
" Venetia, — Venetia Phillips."
" Well, Miss Venetia, you seem fond
of animals. Would you like to see my
collection ? "
He strode to the farther end of the
room and opened a trap door.
" Come over here ! "
The girl peeped through the trap door
into the cellar. There, in a number of
pens, were huddled a small menagerie of
animals, — dogs, cats, guinea-pigs, rab-
bits.
" What do you do with all of them ? "
the girl asked, her heart sinking with
foreboding.
" Cut 'em up ! "
"Cut them up?"
" Sure ! And dose 'em. This is an
experimental laboratory." The doctor
waved his hand rather grandly over the
dirty room. " There are not many like
it in the city of Chicago, I can tell you.
I am conducting investigations, and I
use these little fellers."
" It 's horrid ! " the girl exclaimed,
looking apprehensively at Pete.
" Not a bit of it ! " The doctor reached
his hand down and pulled up a rabbit, a
little mangy object, which tottered a few
steps and then fell down, as if dizzy.
"Jack 's had fifteen minims of the so-
lution of hydrochlorate of manganese this
morning. He looks kind of dopy, don't
he ? He 11 be as smart as a trivet to-
morrow. But I guess he 's about reached
his limit of hydrochlorate, eh, Jack ? "
In spite of herself the girl's curiosi-
ty was aroused. When the doctor had
returned Jack to his pen, she asked,
" What 's that queer machine over
there ? "
" That 's to pump things into your
body, to squirt medicines into you, in-
stead of dropping them into your tummy
loose, as doctors usually do. See ? When
I stick this long needle into you and work
this handle, a little stream of the thing
I want to give you is pumped into your
body at the right spot. Would you like
to have me try it on you ? No ! I
thought not. That's why Jack has to
take his dose every morning."
He went into his explanation more
thoroughly, and they talked of many
things that were as wonderful to Vene-
tia, brought up in the modern city of
Chicago, as if she had come out of Thi-
bet.
" I suppose I shall have to leave Pete.
May I come to see him sometimes ? "
she said at last.
" Sure ! As often as you like. I 'm
generally in afternoons. I '11 telephone
if the patient's pulse gets feeble or his
temperature goes up."
"You need n't make fun of me. And
I think I can find my way home alone,"
she added, as the doctor took las hat from
the table and jammed it on his head.
" I said I 'd see you home. I am not
going to miss seeing you take that first
ride on the cable, not much ! Perhaps
you won't mind walking across the bridge
and up the avenue to the cable line ? It 's
a pretty evening, and it will do you good
to take the air along the river."
372
The Common Lot.
So the two started for the city and
crossed the busy thoroughfare of the
Rush Street Bridge just as the twilight
was touching the murky waters of the
river. The girl was uncomfortably con-
scious that the man by her side was a
very shabbily dressed escort. She was
glad that the uncertain light would hide
her from any of her acquaintances that
might be driving across the bridge at
this hour. The doctor seemed to be in
no hurry ; he paused on the bridge to
watch a tug push a fat grainboat up the
river, until they were almost caught by
the turning draw.
" That 's a fine sight ! " he remarked.
" Yes, the sunset is beautiful," she re-
plied conventionally.
" No ! I mean that big vessel loaded
with grain. That 's what you live on :
it 's what you are, — that and a lot of
dirty cattle over in the pens of the stock-
yard. That 's you, Miss Venetia, —
black hair, pink cheeks, and all ! "
" What a very materialistic way of
looking at life ! " Veuetia replied se-
verely.
" Lord, child ! " the doctor exclaimed
ironically. " Who taught you that hor-
rid word ? " He proceeded to give her
a little lecture on physiology, which oc-
cupied her attention all the way to the
cable car, so that she forgot her snobbish
anxieties.
The car was crowded, and no one of-
fered her a seat. She was obliged to
stand crowded in a corner, swaying from
a strap overhead, while the persistent
doctor told her all about the car, the
motive power, the operatives, the num-
ber of passengers carried daily, the dis-
pute over the renewal of the franchise,
and kindred matters of common concern.
" Now, it 's likely enough some of your
folks own a block of their watered stock,"
he continued in his clear, high voice, that
made itself felt above the rattle of the
car. " And you are helping pay them
their dividends. Some day, though, may-
be the rest of us won't want to go on
paying five cents to ride in their old ca
Then your stock will go down, the wa
will dry up, and perhaps you '11 have o:
or two dresses less. You '11 rememb
then I told you the reason why."
Venetia had heard enough about stocks
and bonds to know that a good deal of
the Phillips money was invested in the
City Railway. But she had also learned
that it was very vulgar for a man to dis-
cuss money matters with a girl. Further-
more, peering about the crowded con-
veyance, she had caught sight of Porter
Howe, one of her brother Stanwood's
friends. He was looking at her and the
doctor, and she began to feel uncomfort-
able again. It had never occurred to
her that the young men of her class were
in the habit of using the street cars, at
least until they had reached those as-
sured positions at the head of industry
which awaited them.
So the novelty of the ride in the pub-
lic car had something of torture in it,
and she was glad enough to escape
through the front door at Eighteen
Street.
" Won't you come in ? " she asked t
doctor politely when they came to the
formidable pile of red brick where she
lived.
" Thanks. I don't believe your folks
will want me to stay to supper, and I
am getting hungry. Hope you enjoyed
your ride. Some day I '11 come and
take you for a trolley ride down toward
the south."
He shook her hand vigorously and
laughed. Then he started briskly for
the city, his hands thrust in his trousers'
pockets, his black felt hat drawn forward
over his brows. Venetia had barely
mounted the first bank of steps befo:
she heard her name.
"Say, Miss Venetia !"
The doctor was shouting back to he
one hand at the side of his mouth.
" Don't you worry about that pup !
think I can bring him round all right."
She nodded, and stepped into the ves
pe
Theodor Mommsen.
373
bule with a sense of relief from her com-
panion. She knew that Dr. Coburn was
what her brother called a " mucker," and
her mother spoke of as a " fellow." Yet
she recognized that there was something
in the man to be respected, and this in-
sight, it may be said, distinguished Ve-
netia from her mother and her brother.
Robert Herrick.
(To be continued.)
THEODOR MOMMSEN.
THE conditions of human life vouch-
safe an immortality of personal fame to
every great artist, but the scholar's por-
tion is usually to be forgotten ; he builds
his share of the City of Knowledge, proud
if they who come after him carry on the
work along his lines, content if they tear
down what he has done, and use for a
fairer building the stones which he has
quarried. For a few brief years after
his death the fragrance of his personality
may linger, the impact of the whole man
may still be felt, but slowly he will pass
over into the long list of scholars known
only to scholars, and even to most of
them only by name. We must needs re-
mind ourselves of these things because
they are truths which we are apt to for-
get in the presence of an individual case,
truths which we are only too ready to
doubt in the fullness of our present know-
ledge. And yet, if they are true, a great
scholar's life when it is completed de-
serves an immediate study before the
color has faded from the sunset sky. It
is safe to say that none of us will ever
again see the like of Theodor Mommsen,
and the elements of the scholar's life
which we may study elsewhere, piecing
them together, here a bit and there a bit,
are found combined in him, and writ so
large that even the most unsympathetic
must be impressed by them.
Christian Matthias Theodor Momm-
sen was born November 30, 1817, at
Garding, a small village in Schleswig-
Holstein, not far from the North Sea.
It was not without result that his earliest
years were passed in the borderland of
Germany, in a province whose heart was
with Germany, but whose land was then
reckoned a part of Denmark, in the years
when the reaction from Napoleon was
setting in, and the German national feel-
ing was springing into life. Up to the
age of seventeen he lived with his par-
ents in company with his two younger
brothers, Tycho (born 1819), afterwards
known for his work on Pindar and Hor-
ace, and August (born 1821), whose
reputation rests principally on his studies
in Greek and Roman chronology. After
spending five years at the Gymnasium
at Altona (near Hamburg), he matricu-
lated in 1838, aged twenty-one, at the
University of Kiel. There he studied for
another five years, attaining his Doctor-
ate of Philosophy in 1843 with a modest
treatise on a subject connected with Ro-
man Law, the forerunner of so many
hundreds of monographs from his pen.
In the following year he obtained a trav-
eling fellowship, which enabled him to
pursue his studies in Italy. He spent
there the years 1843-47. These Wan-
derjahre were a time of wonderful de-
velopment for the young Mommsen. He
made the acquaintance of the great Bor-
ghese, the most famous authority of his
day on Roman Inscriptions. Subsequent-
ly (in 1852) the dedication of Momm-
sen's first great work, the Inscriptions
of the Kingdom of Naples, to Borghese,
" Magistro., Patrono, Amico," bears trib-
374
Theodor Mommsen.
ute to these years. The thirty-year-old
student was already looking far into the
future, for in the last year of the Italian
stay (1847) he published a Plan for a
Corpus of Latin Inscriptions. As early
as 1844 the famous jurist Savigny had
proposed to the Berlin Academy that
Mommsen be put in charge of the Col-
lection of Roman Inscriptions which the
Academy proposed to publish. But when
Mommsen's ideas had been explained to
them they feared the expense and favored
a rival claimant, a certain Zumpt, who
proposed an economical (and worthless)
rehashing of existing printed collections,
whereas Mommsen demanded that the
original stones be sought for again and
recopied. It took Mommsen a year to
establish his point, and he was compelled
to give tangible proof of it in his Inscrip-
tions of the Kingdom of Naples, published
independently, before he was eventually
put in charge of the undertaking.
It is characteristic of the man that
even in the midst of this scholastic work
in the congenial surroundings of Italy
his ear should not have been deaf to the
call of his fatherland. Christian VIII
of Denmark had begun to threaten
the liberty of Schleswig-Holstein, and
Mommsen the epigraphist became ap-
parently lost temporarily in Mommsen
the patriot. With his wonted energy
he not only returned to Schleswig-Hol-
stein, but became the editor of a political
paper in Rendsburg. In the nature of
things his work there came to an end in
the early months of 1848, when Fried-
rich VII succeeded Christian VIII, Den-
mark became a constitutional monarchy,
and the war of the Duchies began. And
so in 1848 the editor of the Schleswig-
Holsteinische Zeitung became the Pro-
fessor of Roman Law in the University
of Leipsic. It need not surprise us that
in this same year the ex-editor, now pro-
fessor, should publish a learned work on
Roman surveying, nor that in the follow-
ing year his political interests, invoking
his sympathy with Prussia, should have
made him so hostile to the Saxon authori-
ties that he was compelled to resign his
professorship and seek refuge in hospit
ble Switzerland. Nothing daunted
his voluntary exile, he accepted a prc
fessorship at the University of Zurich ii
1852, and made the most of his oppor
tunities. These were the years in whicl
he was quietly working on his Roma
History ; but alongside of this he founc
time to turn his environment to a profit
able use, writing the admirable article or
Switzerland in Roman Times, and pub-
lishing a collection of the Latin inscrip-
tions found in Switzerland. These smal
articles are characteristic of the man's
ever present consciousness of envirot
ment and his sympathetic touch with it
In 1854 his Roman History began to
appear, and at the same time he was
transferred from Zurich to Breslau, again
as Professor of Roman Law. The suc-
cess of the Roman History was phenor
enal, and in less than a decade it he
been translated into most of the Eu-
ropean languages. It was largely owing
to the success of the book that he wa
called to Berlin in 1858 to a professor
ship of Ancient History.
In the year of his coming to Berlii
falls the publication of his Ronu
Chronology, a work which, altogethe
aside from its historical value, is of
culiar personal interest because it ws
largely inspired by the writings of his
brother August, and was written in oj
position to his theories. The preface
gives a frank statement of the case, ane
combines in a rare degree personal syi
pathy and admiration for " brother AT;
gust " and reckless objective criticism
the theories of "A. Mommsen," enc
ing with a prayer to the reader not
confuse the two standpoints. " If f utur
biographers shall repeat in connectic
with this controversy the note in the lis
of the Roman Consuls, ' Hei fratres ge-
minifuerunt,' let them do so unhinderec
But those who wish to know the trut
in the matter will, I hope, convince ther
Theodor Mommsen.
375
selves that the personal element does not
enter into the discussion." We can only
wish that the same distinction of person
and thing had characterized all his sub-
sequent expression of opinion in other
connections.
From 1858 on, except for one short
interval, his home was in Berlin ; and,
for most of these forty-five years till his
death, in the modest little house in Char-
lottenburg where he died. During this
almost half-century his scholarly activity
continued unbroken up to within a few
days of his death, for it would be a great
error to consider that his outside interests,
notably his political life, in any wise in-
terfered with his literary activity. The
two proceeded side by side, each inevit-
ably bound up with the other. In 1863
the first volume of Corpus of Latin In-
scriptions appeared, his own work, in
preparation for which he had been plan-
ning and toiling for almost twenty years.
In the following year came the first of
his two volumes of monographs on Ro-
man History. Seven years later the
Roman Constitutional Law appeared, a
stupendous undertaking, as technical and
erudite as the Roman History was pop-
ular and simple. Events were moving
rapidly for him in these years. In 1872
he founded a periodical devoted to the
Science of Inscriptions, — a sort of light-
weight cavalry troop, preceding the slow
moving infantry of the Corpus. In the
following year he was made Perpetual
Secretary of the Berlin Academy, and at
the same time a member of the Prussian
House of Representatives. Until 1882
he continued a member of the Prussian
Diet, identifying himself with the Lib-
eral party, and more particularly with
that portion of it which stood aloof from
Socialism. In these years following the
Franco-Prussian war all eyes were turned
on Bismarck. Mommsen's attitude here
was one of intense hostility. He saw in
Bismarck not the man who had given
unity to Germany, Mommsen's own ideal,
but merely the triumphant aristocrat with
whom he could have no sympathy. His
hostility led him so far as to speak of
Bismarck's policy as a " swindle." He
was brought to trial for his words, and
though he was ultimately acquitted by
the Court of Appeals, it was in a sense
the end of his active political life.
However, during the decade (1873-
82) the scholar was not forgotten in the
politician. In 1877, on the occasion of
his sixtieth birthday, a memorial album
was published in his honor by his friends
and pupils. Six different languages are
used as the medium of expression, and
almost every branch of the study of an-
tiquity is represented. In return Momm-
sen sent to each of the contributors a lit-
tle volume entitled " Roman History by
Theodor Mommsen : Volume IV," — a
reference to the famous fourth volume
of his History, which has never appeared.
It was inscribed with this motto : —
" Genie hatte ieh fortgeschrieben
Aber es ist liegen geblieben." 1
The book contained merely a reprint of
a small article published in Hermes some
time before. But while the fourth vol-
ume was never written, Volume V, the
History of the Roman Provinces under
the Empire, appeared in 1885. A great
multitude of short articles and many re-
visions of already published works helped
to fill up the next fourteen years. But
his main occupation during this time was
the preparation of the work on Roman
Criminal Law, which appeared in 1899,
— a closely printed book of over a thou-
sand pages, crowded with references, and
accompanied by all the paraphernalia of
scholarship, published by this wonderful
old gentleman in his eighty-second year.
It is hardly necessary to add that this
was his last large book, although he con-
tinued to publish articles until the end,
and was at work on the Lives of the Ro-
man Emperors when death stopped his
busy pen, which had been writing for
threescore years.
1 I would have finished it gladly !
But alas ! it lagged so sadly !
376
Theodor Mommsen.
Moramsen's biography is more than a
bibliography, for, wonderful as were his
works, he was more man than book.
We instinctively apply to him his own
words : " Each one must specialize in
one branch of learning, but not shut
himself up in it. How miserable and
small is the world in the eyes of the
man who sees in it only Greek and Latin
authors or mathematical problems ! "
There was no danger of this in his case,
for in him were combined the man of
books, the man of letters, the man of the
state, and the man of the world. Schol-
arship, letters, and politics were all united
in an unforgettable personality. Person-
ally he was a curious combination of the
ascetic savant and the man of the world ;
rising at five to drink a cup of cold cof-
fee to begin his work, so absent-minded
that he failed to recognize his own chil-
dren on the street, so helpless that he
put his crying baby in a scrap-basket
and covered it with papers to deaden the
noise, so absorbed that he set his hair on
fire while looking for a book, — and yet
alongside of this, the social favorite, a
perfect dinner companion, fond of dining
out and of entertaining. It is perhaps
foolhardy at this early date to try to es-
timate the value of his life, and to ap-
praise his worth along the various lines
of activity which he pursued, and yet al-
ready certain great facts are evident.
With that curious fallacy of self-esti-
mation of which history brings so many
instances in the case of great men,
Mommsen possibly set more store by his
political work than by his scholarship or
his letters, and probably he would rather
go down in history as a great statesman
than as a great scholar. Certainly in
the last twenty years of his life the one
drop of bitterness in his cup of joy was
his lack of political power and influence.
He cast longing eyes away from the
honors of scholarship heaped at his feet
to the laurels of the statesman which
were being decreed to others. It is true
that those who knew him cannot con-
ceive of him other than he was, anc
Mommsen without the political instint
would be a riddle beyond solution,
political interests are absolutely essential
to his life ; out of them much that is
otherwise a puzzle may be explained,
and his greatest and most popular worl
owes its greatness and popularity alike
to them. It was no affectation, but the
necessary expression of the whole mar
because he was a whole man. He neve
exchanged living citizenship in the pre
sent in return for the doubtful honor
being more at home in the ancient world
than in the modern. His studies never
brought with them that paralyzing cor
viction of the cyclic movement in histoi
and the vanity of present endeavor.
From the stirring year of 1843 on, when
his sympathy for Schleswig-Holstein's
liberty led him to seek Prussia, for sixty
years he continued a German and
Prussian, — a valiant fighter for the lib-
erty of the individual and the unity
the German people. He was devoid
once of all self-seeking and all fear. Ii
1850, with Haupt and Jahn, he lost his
professorship at Leipsic in his defiance
of Saxony ; and what the youth of 185(
dared then, the old man of 1882 dared
in his defiance of Bismarck. But, after
all, it was Mommsen the scholar that lent
dignity to Mommsen the politician. His
vehemence of expression, which merelj
quickens our attention when it is turne
against Cicero, makes us move uneasilj
when it strikes Bismarck, or the French,
or the English. Especially in his lat
years he spoke with a freedom whicl
the world loved, because it was the gram
old man who spoke, and the world fel
honored that he should speak of it
all ; but his was never the sane, equabl
speech of the calm, deliberate statesmar
However, just as little as we could
ford to lose the touch of the born stat
man Gladstone writing on the Homeric
problem, just so little could we afford
to lose the sight of the born scholar
Mommsen attacking Bismarck. Home
Theodor Mommsen.
377
and Bismarck were not much injured,
while Gladstone and Mommsen gained
infinitely. The eye which saw so clear-
ly the Caesar of two thousand years ago
was holden that it could not see the Caesar
of his own day. Whatever his political
errors and indiscretion may have been,
in at least two points he was a rock of
strength, — in his opposition to the fat-
uous anti-Semitic movement in recent
years, and in his championship of aca-
demic freedom.
But the man who failed to be in poli-
tics all he desired to be, succeeded in
scholarship and in literature beyond his
highest expectations. He was certainly
the greatest scholar of our time, and in
point of toilsome erudition turned into
knowledge, it is doubtful if the world has
ever seen his superior. To Mommsen,
history and jurisprudence were insepara-
bly combined, but any estimate of him
must distinguish between the two fields,
because, great as were his deserts in both,
he accomplished a very different thing in
one case than in the other. At the time
when Mommsen turned to the study of
Roman jurisprudence, private law had
been rescued from the philologists by Sa-
vigny and his predecessors, but public law
was still in the grasp of men who cared
more about history than law, and more
about literature than both law and his-
tory. It was fortunate that Mommsen's
early training had taught him more of
law than the average philologist knew,
and that he was not a philologist attack-
ing the study of law, but an out-and-out
jurist, philologically trained. The result
was that he accomplished what neither
jurists nor philologists before him had
been able to do, — namely, he presented
Roman law as a lawyer would present
it, but with the philological knowledge
which a lawyer would ordinarily lack.
His treatment marks, therefore, a distinct
advance both in method and in know-
ledge : in method, because the subject
was treated as jurisprudence, not as phi-
lology demanded ; in knowledge, because
the philologist found new material, which
had hitherto escaped the jurists.
Many men go into the vineyards of
history and gather the grapes, many
others press out the wine, but there are
few who do both, as Mommseu did.
There is hardly a source of Roman his-
tory where he has not been at work
at some time in his busy life, improv-
ing texts, arranging chronology, pointing
out parallels, explaining allusions. The
largest source of all, the material in in-
scriptions, has been so widened and clar-
ified by his lifework on the Corpus of
Latin Inscriptions that it has become al-
most a new field. Of course there were
many collaborators ; that very fact re-
dounds to his credit, partly because he
was one of the greatest exponents of the
cooperative method in scholarship, and
partly because the presence of these col-
laborators, while it made the task feasi-
ble, by no means removed many of its
difficulties. The ability to pick the best
men, to gain their cooperation, and to
keep them at the height of their output,
and their output at its highest quality, —
these are the traits of a great general,
and here, too, Mommsen was tried and
not found wanting. The infinitude of
small detail incident to the publication
of a volume of inscriptions is fully known
only to one who has attempted it, but
even a layman cannot pick up a volume
of the Corpus without an overwhelming
sense of the multitude of minute facts
requisite to the proper fulfillment of the
task. Yet in all the volumes for which
Mommsen is directly responsible, inac-
curacies are so rare that a positive inter-
est attaches to one little inscription to
which Mommsen wrote a Latin comment
with this humiliating confession : " I
have unfortunately neglected to make a
note of where I found this inscription."
One is tempted to feel that here in the
Corpus and in his publication of the Mon-
umenta Germanise, the sources of early
German history, that better part of bis
work lies which shall not be taken from
378
Theodor Mommsen.
him. It does not seem possible that schol-
arship will ever reach the point where
these books will be out of date. Cer-
tainly no scholar now living can point
out any reason why this should ever be
so. But if that which is not at present
conceivable should eventually be realized,
if the day should come when some grand
international Academy should reedit the
body of Roman inscriptions along some
new and superior line, so that the present
Corpus would have merely historic in-
terest, Mommsen's name would still live,
and that in a totally different connection,
in the realm not of pure scholarship, but
of mere literature.
Some one has well said that but for
the Roman History Mommsen would be
a great man " taken on faith." That is
probably true, but we have the Roman
History, — perhaps the most remarkable
piece of German literature written in
the middle of the nineteenth century. It
is a wonderful testimony to the power of
humanity over humanity that the most
human work which Mommsen wrote
should be the most popular. The Ro-
man History was the expression of the
whole man, and if ever it should cease
to have value as Roman history, it will
never cease to be of value as a spirit-
ual document, as a picture of the hopes
and ideals of Theodor Mommsen. By
a happy chance, when the book was
brought into the world it appeared in the
naked simplicity of its narrative with-
out the swaddling clothes of footnotes
and sources. The clear-cut style showed
forth to its best advantage. The world
at large took its statements on faith, schol-
ars were at liberty to test them in other
books of Mommsen himself, or of other
men. At the time when his history was
published the world was feeling the re-
action which was bound to follow the
renunciation demanded by the new criti-
cal method of Niebuhr. That scholar
had shown most brilliantly what Roman
history was not. He had made many
erasures. It remained for Mommsen to
fill them up and show what Roman his-
tory was. Mommsen had to help him,
what Niebuhr had not had, the compara-
tive method. Yet it is not even this
method with its results, nor yet his com-
mercial theory of the origin of Rome,
which elevates his book to its rank in lit-
erature. It was the fact that the author
wrote it out of the fullness of his own
feelings. Rome had done, so Mommsen
thought, what his own Germany had
failed to do. With a careful guarding
of all the liberties of the individual she
had worked out her own unity. And so
Mommsen read Roman history in the
light of the nineteenth century, and stud-
ied contemporary politics in the light of
Roman history. A book thus written
with the heart enforcing the head could
not fail of success. Impartial history it
is not, but literature it is, — and of the
first order. And yet, with all its exag-
geration it does not go wide of the mark,
and it is a question whether the artist
Mommsen did not come nearer to ultimate
historical truth than the scholar Momm-
sen did in his more objective works. It
may lose in calm judicial weighing of
opinion, but in passion and dramatic ef-
fect it gains almost the value of the nar-
rative of a contemporary historian.
We are in an age of extreme reticence
in regard to opinion. We are willing
to write endless columns of the debit and
credit of historical facts, yet few have
the courage to add up and strike the bal-
ance. But learning can ripen into know-
ledge only in the sunshine of opinion.
Mommsen opened up to the world a
wealth of historical sources. Other men
will use them, and scholarship will be ad-
vanced by them, yet their names and the
name of Mommsen will be hidden under
their own massive constructions. But
the Roman History as a work of art is
an abiding possession, never out of date
as literature, a memorial to its author
more lasting than bronze.
Jesse Benedict Carter.
A Wind -Call. — The Decent Thing.
379
A WIND-CALL.
DUST thou art, and unto dust,
Playfellow, return thou must ;
Lingering death it is to stay
In the prison-house of clay —
Bricks of Egypt year by year
Walling up a sepulchre.
Better far the soul to free
From its close captivity,
And with us, thy comrades, go
Wheresoe'er we list to blow.
Come ! for soon again to dust,
Playfellow, return thou must.
John B. Tabb.
THE DECENT THING.
I.
THE chattering typewriters had ceased
their gossiping, and the telegraph instru-
ments down the corridor were snapping
out in sharp metallic clicks the lag end
of things coming in too late for the last
edition. The electric fan in the corner
sang like a droning bee. The hot, dead
air from the street below entered at the
open window, was caught in its brass
blades, and skirled out into the corridor
to fight with the heavy odor of printers'
ink. The clock hands were crawling to-
ward five, and three men were watching
them crawl. If ever five were reached
without a summons from the city editor,
Jackson, the tall man with the brierwood
pipe, would go to the beach ; Fay, the
man with the corncob, would go home
to his wife and three children ; Barton,
the cub, would go, — well, he did n't
know where he would go.
Fay, who covered funerals and such
things, whined a complaint about people
dying in July.
" It 's the most sensible thing a man
can do," opined Jackson.
" And then," continued Fay, unloosen-
ing his collar, " to think of their having
the nerve to go and get burned ! Bah !
I can stand a funeral in a house where
the blinds are down and it 's cool, but
services at a crematory, with the forced
draft and " —
" Oh, cut it out ! " cried Barton.
" I shall dream of that " —
" Barton ! Oh, Barton ! " It was the
office boy with a call from the city editor.
As Barton hurried out, Jackson re-
moved the pipe from his mouth.
" He 's about all in," said he.
" Good thing," answered Fay. " If
he can get scared out of this work, he is
to be congratulated."
" It is n't fear. I know what it is.
I 've had it."
" Home and mother ? "
" Bah ! " growled Jackson in disgust.
"One could hold a more intelligent con-
versation with a rhinoceros on the uses
of face powder."
380
The Decent Thing.
Both men smoked on in silence. Then
Fay said irritably, —
" Your simile is far-fetched, and you
are n't up against the proposition of how
to support five on twenty per week. Damn
such weather ! The baby is sick."
When Barton returned to the room,
Jackson glanced curiously at him.
" What cher got, kid ? "
There was a strained expression on
Barton's face as of one very ill. His lips
were white and compressed, and beaded
with moisture. He threw himself in a
chair without answering, and folding his
arms on the desk before him, buried his
face, not weeping.
Fay went out.
" What cher got, Billy ? " asked Jack-
son again.
Barton slowly raised his head. He
had delicate, sympathetic features, of the
kind capable of hardening on occasion.
" What have I got ? " he repeated
fiercely ; " I 've got another misery story.
Weymouth has a tip that old Baxter, who
lost all his money last year, is living out
of town here in a garret with his daugh-
ter. It is one of his damn human inter-
est stories. ' Go write up the contrast,'
said he, ' the poverty, the dying old man,
faithful daughter brought up in society
now doing housework. Whoop it up
for a Sunday special ! ' Why can't he
let 'em alone ? "
" It 's a good story," commented Jack-
son without removing his pipe.
For a second Billy stared straight
ahead of him, and then suddenly leaning
forward, he asked in a nervous, pleading
voice, —
" I say, Jackson, is n't there anything
decent in this world ? "
" Lots of things, if you are blind
enough to see them."
" Then God help me ! " burst out Bar-
ton, rising to his feet. " I wish I were
blind ! I can't look a man in the face
now without wondering when he is going
crooked ; I can't look at the outside of
a respectable house, without wondering
when a skeleton is going to stalk forth ;
I — I can't look a woman in the face
without — Oh, I 'm sick of it, — sick
of it, do you hear ? I want to get back
to the green fields, and the mountains,
and the fresh air! I am sick of all
this ! "
He stood there with his nostrils quiv-
ering as though he had been running.
Jackson arose, and going to his side, laid
a hand upon his arm.
" See here, boy, I don't want the re-
sponsibility of inducing you to remain in
this business. I believe as the French-
man said, ' It 's a good business if you
get out of it soon enough.' Only there
are some of us who don't get out ; could
n't get out if we wanted to. And we
don't want to. That 's the trouble, we
don't want to. But don't run and don't
get out too soon. That 's worse. It 's —
it 's like going behind the scenes and see-
ing the tinsel, and the paint, and the
wheels, without waiting long enough to
learn what it all means. Now listen,
Billy ; I don't set myself up as a philoso-
pher, but I have learned this, — there is
just one decent thing in all this world,
but that one thing makes all things else
decent. Find it before you quit. Find
it for yourself."
He looked at Barton a moment as
though about to say more, but changed
his mind and started from the room.
He knew the lad would be ashamed of
himself for his temporary weakness, and
likely enough would hate him for his ad-
vice. But he turned back once.
" Say, why don't you come down to
the beach and have a swim before you
start ? You are looking kind of white."
"No," answered Billy, with sudden
stubbornness, " I 'm going. I 'm going
now."
So he took the 5.30 train for Wessex.
The stuffy, suffocating cars were drawn
over hot rails by a panting engine, leav-
ing in their wake a cloud of dry, yellow
dust. Men spoke seldom, and then me-
chanically, in emotionless monosyllables.
The Decent Thing.
381
A querulous babe cried in spasms. The
sun sank red behind the parched fields,
and left an atmosphere as parched as the
grass itself. The brown landscape flowed
past the car windows, a dark stream, like
a sluggish tropical river. The monotony
of it all was only varied by the sight of
factories and huts, and yards full of bro-
ken and unclean things.
He leaned far back in the seat, and
closed his eyes. His mind became occu-
pied with trying to find breath in the gas-
laden atmosphere, and in thinking an
exasperating air which he soon felt that
he must hum in time with the clicking of
the car wheels over the rails. It was an
unpleasant task, but if he neglected it,
the cars would go off the rail or some-
thing, and then there would be an odd,
jumbled-up mass of twisted iron and
splinters, with arms and legs sticking
out. And he would have to go round
and ask their names for his paper. Yes,
he would have to shout into that pile of
burning ties, —
" I say, you with the arm sticking out,
I 'm from the Times, what 's your name ? "
If the man died, gasping it, would that
be a scoop ?
He laughed mirthlessly as he straight-
ened himself and gazed out the window
again.
The lamps in the car had been light-
ed before the smutty - faced brakeman
growled, " Wessex."
He found himself on the station plat-
form. A small boy was watching the
disappearing train, and wriggling his toes
in an uncomfortable fashion. A baggage-
man in blue overalls was making much
ado over the single parcel left on the hot
planks. Beyond the station, Billy saw
a few houses, lights in the windows ; be-
yond that, darkness. He stood there
stupidly, looking at the lights.
" Waitin' fer some one? " queried the
baggageman.
" Yes," answered Billy mechanically.
"Hot, ain't it?"
" Yes."
" Should n't wonder if we had a
shower."
"Yes."
He wondered vaguely how much this
fellow stole in the course of a year. He
was of half a mind to ask him. It would
make a good story, — trusted railroad
employee, country station —
" — and so I reckon I 'd better g'orn
home and tell my wife and be done with
it."
What had the man been talking about ?
" I tell yer, young feller, don't you
never git married. That 's when yer
troubles begin ! "
Billy turned upon him fiercely, with
sudden madness : —
" You lie ! It 's good for a man, I tell
you. It 's " —
The baggageman was staring in open-
mouthed astonishment. Billy regained
his senses.
" I beg your pardon. I — I — Where
does old man Baxter live ? "
" Old man Baxter ? " asked the bag-
gageman suspiciously.
" Poor old man Baxter."
" Dunno 's he 's so poor. He lives on
the old Baxter place down the road.
Keep up over the hill and g'orn till you
come to a little house with a flower gar-
den before it."
The man sidled away, and from a safe
distance watched Billy as he stumbled
off down the road.
It was a pleasant road, a peaceful,
quiet sort of road, with large maple trees
either side of it and fields beyond, but it
was full of a white hot dust that choked
and burned. He hurried along unmind-
ful of the cooling breeze trying to stir
the large green leaves, unmindful that
the air was freshening, unmindful of the
night song of the birds. He continued
to the turn, and kept on over the hill.
By that sheer force of will power which
a runner exercises on the last mile of a
long race, he forced his legs down the
hill to the house with the flower garden
before it.
382
The Decent Thing.
There was a light in the window.
He stumbled and fell.
II.
When Billy opened his eyes, he knew
that two persons were bending over him,
though in the dark he could not dis-
tinguish their faces.
" He 's fainted, dad," said one in a
voice soft, low, half full of fright. It
was as though a shadow should speak.
With an effort Billy rose on his elbow.
"I — I beg pardon," he said.
A man's hand was laid upon his
shoulder.
" What 's the trouble, lad ? "
It was the voice of an old man.
" Trouble ? I — I don't know. I
fell."
" I guess it 's the heat. Can you walk
a little ? Ruth, take his other arm."
Between the two, still unconscious of
where he was, he reached the cottage
with the flower garden before it. They
led him into the living-room, where a
single candle was burning, and bade him
sit while they hurried about for water and
ice. Then he knew where he was, —
knew with a rush of ugly thoughts that
nearly drove him again into unconscious-
ness. This was old man Baxter's home.
He closed his eyes. He had no right
there, no right to see. He would n't see !
He would take their cooling draught, and
then go out, his eyes still closed so that
he should not be even tempted to de-
scribe what was within.
But he heard a voice near him, —
" Won't you drink this ? "
And upon opening his eyes he saw be-
side him a young woman clothed in dainty
white muslin, holding out to him a glass
in which the ice tinkled. He drank, his
eyes still upon her.
" You look very tired and — and hun-
gry," she said. " Are you hungry ? "
" No," he answered.
He should have been hungry, for he
had not eaten since breakfast, but all he
knew now was that the mere sight of tl
girl, so fresh, so pure, so cool, was as
balm to his eyes, and through his eyes
reached and cooled his feverish brain.
Then dad came in with an ice bag for
his head, and made him lie back in the
chair a few moments while this took the
heat from out the space over his brow.
He studied him in the feeble candlelight,
— an old man with hair snow-white and
a clean shaven face furrowed with deep
lines just above the aquiline nose and
about the thin mouth, his eyes half hid-
den beneath shaggy brows. And beside
him was his daughter, one arm thrown
over his shoulder. Her face was his face
without the lines, and throughout of a
finer mould, differing only in that her
eyes were gray and his were blue. Anc
both were happy. He thanked God for
that, — they both looked happy. He felt,
as much as saw, that the room in which
they sat was comfortably furnished ; and
in the dark, in one corner, he discovered
the outlines of a piano. He thanked God
for that, too.
The ice made him very comfortable
and half drowsy. He would have liked
to remain there so, indefinitely, just
watching these two. There seemed to
be no reason why he should n't until —
he suddenly remembered who he was.
He had no right there ! He was a news-
paper man ! He had come to hurt them,
— to lay bare to the world, in the brutal
fashion of a Sunday paper, the sweet pri-
vacy of their life ! He was to bring the
world into this house, — the coarse, vul-
gar, curious world they had fled to
cape ! He felt as foul as he who spit
upon Godiva!
Staggering to his feet, he started act
the room.
" I must go," he said huskily,
must go."
" No, no ! " exclaimed the girl, " yoi
must n't go yet. There is no carriaf
and you cannot walk."
" Ruth is right," added the old gentle
The Decent Thing.
383
man. " You will faint before you reach
the road. If you have important busi-
ness " —
" No, I have n't any business, only " —
Why, that was it : he had n't any busi-
ness. How simple it was ! He returned
to his chair with a heavy weight lifted
from his shoulders. His thought up to
now had been that he must obey orders,
for that had been drilled into him as it
is into a soldier. Well, and if he would
not, what then ? His brain started to rea-
son about the matter, but he would not
listen. He refused absolutely to listen,
even at the beginning. He was sole mas-
ter of himself, and that was the end of it.
"You are very good to me," he said ;
" I feel much better."
" You have walked far to-day ? " asked
the old gentleman, not to question, but
out of sympathy.
" No, not far," answered Billy. " Only
it has been a rough road and a hot, dusty
road."
He glanced first at the girl and then
at the father, with a curious look of doubt,
pleading, and frankness.
" Do you mind if — if I forget a lit-
tle?"
The father drew his daughter closer.
" No," he said, " forget. This is the
house of Oblivion."
She kissed her father's hair and smiled
her assent, too.
" I have a sister who looks like you,"
went on Billy. "My name is Barton.
I come from Maine. She is down there
now among the trees, — the big trees."
The old gentleman bowed slightly.
"My name is Baxter. This is my
daughter."
Billy rose, but she motioned him to be
seated again. He leaned far back in the
big chair. Though still feeling weak, all
the pain had vanished, all the fever. He
felt as one tired and dusty does after a
bath in a clear cold spring. Glancing
about him once again, he noticed how
each article in the room breathed that
wonderful word, " Home."
" Oh, but this is good ! " he exclaimed.
" You don't know how good this is ! "
The old man's eyes and the young
man's eyes met and they understood each
other.
" You have learned early," said the
elder. " It took me fifty years to learn
what is good."
The girl was watching them both curi-
ously, not understanding.
" You men ! " she said, with a little
laugh ; " I envy you your power of learn-
ing. You learn — everything, and we
women, we go on learning only by acci-
dent."
" But half of what we learn," said her
father, " is learning all over again. We
forget so much ! "
" And we remember so much ! " said
she.
" And happiness is only learning what
to remember and what to forget," said
Billy.
" And we all get so mixed up and
Maeterlincky when we try to be wise,"
she laughed.
And then they all laughed together,
with the perfect sympathy of three notes
going to make up a chord.
Billy settled himself more comfortably.
But this was good ! There was such
a dead certainty about happiness like
theirs, and it was big and wholesome
and beautiful, like a spring morning.
They chatted away for an hour, the
girl always laughing when the conversa-
tion threatened to become serious, and
dad and Billy always stopping to listen,
and then to laugh themselves. And
finally dad asked her to play, and with-
out excuse she melted into the shadow
of the piano and struck a chord.
" But do you not play, Mr. Barton ? "
she asked, turning a moment.
" I used to play a little, — the violin,
— but" —
The old gentleman straightened him-
self.
" Won't you try ? T myself used to
play, but now " —
384
The Decent Thing.
He held out his palsied, trembling arm.
When he brought the instrument to
the young man, he passed his hand over
it as a father often does over his child's
head when introducing him to a stranger.
"I think you will like it," he said
simply.
And as Billy tuned it, he felt his nerves
thrill at the softness of it, — the sympathy
of it.
They sat there in the light of the single
candle, she at the piano in the shadows,
Billy in his chair, with the instrument
tucked heneath his chin, and his eyes
closed, the old gentleman with his hand
over his brow, as though in prayer. He
spoke only to ask them to play some
favorite air of his. Billy seemed to re-
member everything that evening, and she
at the piano followed him almost intui-
tively with rich soft chords and little
laughing hurries of her own, up and down
the keys. And as they listened, each fol-
lowed a different path with his thoughts,
— the old man, the young man, and the
girl. But that which they dreamed that
hour was sacred to them ever after.
The last air died away. There was a
long silence in which the essence of all
those songs still lingered like the perfume
of flowers just removed. The old gen-
tleman could be heard breathing deeply,
regularly. Then Billy was conscious of
a whisper.
" He has not slept so for long, — oh,
very long ! " she said.
" Do not wake him," he whispered in
reply ; " I will go. I am very strong
now."
He tiptoed across the floor, she follow-
ing.
" I am sure," she said, "he would wish
you to remain. May I call him ? "
It was odd, the way she asked if she
might. He liked it.
" No," he answered ; " such sleep
should not be broken. You will thank
him for me ? "
He found his cap and she went with
him to the end of the path. He hesitated
because he did not like to say good-by.
Only her little form was visible in the
dark, with just a white suggestion of the
face.
"It is very wonderful how you two
have come into my life," he said. There
was a touch of finality in his tone which
she was quick to catch.
" But you speak as though you were
not to return," she said.
He seemed to ponder a moment.
" I thought so at first because — Why,
perhaps I am to return ! "
" Yes, I think you are to return," she
said. " And — and dad asks you to tea
to-morrow."
She had gone.
•
When Billy Barton stamped up the
office stairs the next morning, he was
whistling a brisk march. There was a
swing to his shoulders, a careless poise to
his head, and a brusqueness of manner
which had not been his for many months.
The city editor glanced up as he en-
tered the office.
" Well ! " he growled.
"Nothin1 doin','' said Billy cheerfully.
" What ! "
" No story down there."
A moment the editor stared at him.
Then he said very slowly, —
" Young man, I feel way down deep in
my heart that your talents are being
wasted here. I wish you Godspeed."
" S'long," said Billy.
Down the corridor he saw Jackson,
and made a dive for him.
" I 've found it, Jackson ! Oh, I 've
found it ! " he shouted.
Then a broad grin slowly spread over
his features, and he gave Jackson's hand
a grip that made the latter wince.
" And say," he announced, " I 'm
fired ! "
" So ! " said Jackson. " What you go-
ing to do ? "
" Do ? " queried Billy as though sur-
prised at the question ; " do ? Why, I 'm
going to Wessex for tea ! "
Frederick Orin Bartlett.
The Beggar's Pouch.
385
THE BEGGAR'S POUCH.
A RICH American, with a kind heart
and a lively sense of humor, was heard
to remark as he crossed the Italian fron-
tier, en route for Switzerland, " Now,
if there be any one in the length and
breadth of Italy who has not yet begged
from me, this is his time to come for-
ward."
It was a genial invitation, betokening
that tolerance of mind rarely found in
the traveling Saxon, who is fortified
against beggars, as against many other
foreign institutions, by a petition - proof
armor of finely welded principle and pre-
judice. He disapproves of mendicancy
in general. He believes — or he says
he believes — that you wrong and de-
grade your fellow men by giving them
coppers. He has the assurance of his
guidebook that the corps of ragged vet-
erans who mount guard over every church
door in Rome are unworthy of alms, be-
ing themselves capitalists on no ignoble
scale. His irritation, when sore beset, is
natural and pardonable. His arguments
are not easily answered. He can be
vaguely statistical, — real figures are hard
to come by in Italy, — he can be earnest-
ly philosophical, he can quote Mr. Au-
gustus Hare. In the end, he leaves you
perplexed in spirit and dull of heart,
with sixpence saved in your pocket, and
the memory of pinched old faces — which
do not look at all like the faces of capi-
talists at home — spoiling your appetite
for dinner.
This may be right, but it is a melan-
choly attitude to adopt in a land where
beggary is an ancient and not dishonor-
able profession. All art, all legend, all
tradition, tell for the beggar. The splen-
did background against which he stands
gives color and dignity to his part. We
see him sheltered by St. Julian, — ah,
beautiful young beggar of the Pitti ! —
— fed by St. Elizabeth, clothed by St.
VOL. xcm. — NO. 557. 25
Martin, warmed by the fagots which
St. Francesca Romano gathered for him
in the wintry woods. What heavenly
blessings have followed the charity shown
to his needs, what evils have followed
thick and fast where he has been reject-
ed ! I remember these things when I
meet his piteous face and outstretched
palm to-day. It is true that the Italian
beggar almost always takes a courteous,
or even an impatient denial in wonder-
fully good part ; but, should he feel dis-
posed to be malevolent, I am not one to
be indifferent to his malevolence. I do
not like to hear a shaken old voice wish
that I may die unshriven. There are too
many possibilities involved.
" So sang a withered Sibyl energetical,
And banned the ungiving door with lips pro-
phetical."
Mr. Henry James is of the opinion
(and one envies him his ability to hold
it) that " the sum of Italian misery is,
on the whole, less than the sum of the
Italian knowledge of life. That people
should thank you, with a smile of en-
chanting sweetness, for the gift of two-
pence is a proof certainly of an extreme
and constant destitution ; but — keeping
in mind the sweetness — it is also a proof
of a fortunate ability not to be depressed
by circumstances." This is a comforting
faith to foster, and more credible than
the theory of secreted wealth within the
beggar's pouch. It takes a great many
pennies to build up a substantial fortune,
and the competition in mendicancy is too
keen to permit of the profits being large.
The business — like other roads to for-
tune — is " not what it once was." A
particularly good post, long held and
undisputed, an imposingly venerable and
patriarchal appearance, a total absence
of legs or arms, — these things may lead
to modest competency ; but" these things
are rare equipments. My belief in the
386
The Beggar's Pouch.
affluence of beggars — a belief I was
cherishing carefully for the sake of my
own peace of mind — received a rude
shock when I beheld a crippled old wo-
man, whose post was in the Piazza S.
Claudio, tucked into a doorway one cold
December midnight, her idle crutches ly-
ing on her knees. If she had had a com-
fortable, or even an uncomfortable home
to go to, why should she have stayed to
shiver and freeze in the deserted Roman
streets ?
The latitude extended by the Italian
Church to beggars, the patronage shown
them, never ceases to vex the tourist mind.
An American cannot reconcile himself
to marching up the church steps between
two rows of mendicants, each provided
with a chair, a little scaldino, and a tin
cup, in which a penny rattles lustily.
There is nothing casual about the appear-
ance of these freeholders. They make
no pretense — as do beggars at home
— of sudden emergency, or frustrated
hopes. They are following their daily
avocation, — the only one for which they
are equipped, — and following it in a
spirit of acute and healthy rivalry. To
give to one and not to all is to arouse
such a clamorous wail that it seems, on
the whole, less stony-hearted to refuse
altogether. Once inside the sacred walls,
we find a small and well-selected body of
practitioners hovering around the portals,
waiting to exact their tiny toll when we
are ready to depart. " Exact " is not
too strong a word to use, for I have had
a lame but comely young woman, dressed
in decent black, with a black veil fram-
ing her expressive face, hold the door of
the Aracoali firmly barred with one arm,
while she swept the other toward me in a
gesture so fine, so full of mingled entreaty
and command, that it was worth double
the fee she asked. Occasionally — not
often — an intrepid beggar steals around
during mass, and, touching each member
of the congregation on the shoulder, gen-
tly implores an alms. This is a practice
frowned upon as a rule, save in Sicily,
where a " plentiful poverty " doth so
abide that no device for moving com-
passion can be too rigidly condemned. I
have been present at a high mass in
Palermo, when a ragged woman with a
baby in her arms moved slowly after the
sacristan, — who was taking up the of-
fertory collection, — and took up a sec-
ond collection of her own, quite as though
she were an authorized official. It was a
scandalous sight to Western eyes, — in
our well-ordered churches at home such
a proceeding would be as impossible as
a trapeze performance in the aisle, — but
what depths of friendly tolerance it dis-
played, what gentle, if inert, compassion
for the beggar's desperate needs !
For in Italy, as in Spain, there is
no gulf set between the rich and poor.
What these lands lack in practical phi-
lanthropy is atoned for by a sweet and
universal friendliness of demeanor, and
by a prompt recognition of rights. It
would be hard to find in England or
America such tattered rags, such gaunt
faces and hungry eyes ; but it would be im-
possible to find in Italy or Spain a church
where rags are relegated to some incon-
spicuous and appropriate background.
The Roman beggar jostles — but jostles
urbanely — the Roman prince ; the no-
blest and the lowliest kneel side by side
in the Cathedral of Seville. I have heard
much all my life about the spirit of equali-
ty, and I have listened to fluent sermons,
designed to prove that Christians — im-
pelled by supernatural grace — love this
equality with especial fervor ; but I have
never seen its practical workings, save in
the churches of southern Europe. There
tired mothers hush their babies to sleep,
and wan children play at ease in their
Father's house. There I have been priv-
ileged to stand for hours, during long
and beautiful services, because the only
available chairs had been appropriated
by forlorn creatures who would not have
been permitted to intrude into the guard-
ed pews at home.
It has been always thus. We have
The Beggar's Pouch.
387
the evidence of writers who give it with
reluctant sincerity ; — of Borrow, for
example, who firmly believed he hated
many things for which he had a natural
and visible affinity. " To the honour of
Spain be it spoken," he writes in The
Bible in Spain, " that it is one of the
few countries in Europe where poverty
is never insulted, nor looked upon with
contempt. Even at an inn the poor man
is never spurned from the door, and, if
not harboured, is at least dismissed with
fair words, and consigned to the mercies
of God and His Mother."
The more ribald Nash, writing centu-
ries earlier, finds no words too warm in
which to praise the charities of Catho-
lic Rome. — " The bravest Ladies, in
gownes of beaten gold, washing pilgrims'
and poor soldiours' feete. . . . This I
must say to the shame of us English ; if
good workes may merit Heaven, they
doe them, we talk about them."
The Roman ladies " doe them " still ;
not so picturesquely as they did three
hundred years ago, but in the same noble
and delicate spirit. Their means and
their methods are far below the means
and methods of charitable organizations
in England and America. They cannot
find work where there is no work to be
done. They cannot lift the hopeless
burden of want which is the inevitable
portion of the Italian poor. They can
at best give only the scanty loaf which
keeps starvation from the door. They
cannot educate the children, nor make
the swarming populace of Rome " self-
respecting," by which we mean self-sup-
porting. But they can and do respect
the poverty they alleviate. Their men-
tal attitude is simpler than ours. They
know well that it is never the wretchedly
poor who " fear fate and cheat nature,"
and they see, with more equanimity than
we can muster, the ever recurring tra-
gedy of birth. The hope — so dear to
our Western hearts — of ultimately rais-
ing the whole standard of humanity
shines very dimly on their horizon ; but
if they plan less for the race, they draw
closer to the individual. They would
probably, if questioned, say frankly with
Sir Thomas Browne, " I give no alms
only to satisfy the hunger of my Brother,
but to fulfil and accomplish the Will and
Command of my God." And if the Re-
ligio Medici be somewhat out of date, —
superseded, we are told, by a finer altru-
ism which rejects the system of reward, —
we may still remember Mr. Pater's half-
rueful admission that it was all " pure
profit " to its holder.
When Charles Lamb lamented, with
innate perversity, the decay of beggars,
he merely withdrew his mind from actu-
alities, — which always annoyed him, —
and set it to contemplate those more
agreeable figures which were not suffer-
ing under the disadvantage of existence.
It was the beggar of romance, of the bal-
lads, of the countryside, of the merry old
songs, whose departure he professed to
regret. The outcast of the London streets
could not have been — even in Lamb's
time — a desirable feature. To-day we
find him the most depressing object in the
civilized world ; and the fact that he is
what is called, in the language of the phi-
lanthropist, " unworthy," makes him no
whit more cheerful of contemplation.
The ragged creature who rushes out of
the darkness to cover the wheel of your
hansom with his tattered sleeve manages
to convey to your mind a sense of degrad-
ed wretchedness, calculated to lessen the
happiness of living. His figure haunts
you miserably, when you want to forget
him and be light of heart: By his side,
the venerable, white-bearded old hum-
bugs who lift the leather curtains of Ro-
man and Venetian churches stand forth
as cheerful embodiments of self-respect-
ing mendicancy. They, at least, are no
pariahs, but recognized features of the
social system. They are the Lord's poor,
whose prayers are fertile in blessings. It
is kind to drop a coin into the out-
stretched hand, and to run the risk —
not so appalling as we seem to think —
388
The Beggar's Pouch.
of its being unworthily bestowed. " Rake
not into the bowels of unwelcome truth
to save a half -penny ; " but remember,
rather, the ever ready alms of Dr. John-
son, who pitied most those who were least
deserving of compassion. Little doubt
that he was often imposed upon. The
fallen women went on their way, sinning
as before. The " old struggler " prob-
ably spent his hard-earned shilling for
gin. The sick beggar whom he carried
on his back should by rights have been
languishing in the poorhouse. But the
human quality of his kindness made it
a vital force, incapable of waste. It
warmed sad hearts in his unhappy time,
as it warms our sad hearts now. Like
the human kindness of St. Martin, it
still remains — a priceless heritage — to
enrich us poor beggars in sentiment to-
day.
And this reminds me to ask — without
hope of answer — if the blessed St. Mar-
tin can be held responsible for the num-
ber of beggars in Tours ? The town is
not pinched and hunger-bitten like the
sombre old cities of Italy, but possesses
rather an air of comfort and gracious
prosperity. It is in the heart of a pro-
vince where cruel poverty is unknown,
and where " thrift and success present
themselves as matters of good taste."
Yet we cannot walk half an hour in Tours
without meeting a number of highly re-
spectable beggars engrossed in their pro-
fessional duties. They do not sin against
the harmony of their surroundings by
any revolting demonstration of ragged-
ness or penury. On the contrary, they
are always neat and decent; and, on
Sundays, have an aspect of such unob-
trusive well-being that one would never
suspect them of mendicancy. When a
clean, comfortably dressed old gentle-
man, with a broad straw hat and a rose-
bud in his buttonhole, crosses the street
to affably ask an alms, I own I am sur-
prised, until I remember St. Martin, who,
sixteen hundred years ago, shared his
military mantle with the beggar shiver-
ing by the way. It was at Amiens that
incident occurred, but the soldier sain
became in time the apostle and bishop of
Tours ; wherefore it is in Tours, and not
in Amiens, that beggars do plentiful!
abound to-day ; it is in Tours, and
in Amiens, that the charming old tal
moves us to sympathy with their not very
obvious needs. They are an inheritance
bequeathed us by the saint. They are
in strict accord with the traditions of t
spot. I am told that giving sous to o
men at church doors is not a practi
form of benevolence ; but neither was it
practical to cut a valuable cloak in two.
Something must be allowed to impu
something to the generous unreason
humanity.
And, after all, it is not begging, bu
only the beggar who has forfeited favor
with the elect. We are begged from on an
arrogantly large scale all our lives, and
we are at liberty to beg from others. It
may be wrong to give ten cents to a leg-
less man at a street corner ; but it is right,
and even praiseworthy, to send ten tick-
ets for some dismal entertainment to our
dearest friend, who must either purchase
the dreaded things, or harass her friends
in turn. If we go to church, we are con-
fronted by a system of begging so com-
plicated and so resolute that all other
demands sink into insignificance by its
side. John Richard Green, the historian,
was wont to maintain that the begging
friar of the pre-reform period, " who at
any rate had the honesty to sing for his
supper, and preach a merry sermon from
the portable pulpit he carried round
had been far outstripped by a " fin
mendicant," the begging rector of to-da
A hospital nurse once told me that s
was often too tired to go to church
— when free — on Sundays. "But it
does n't matter whether I go or not," she
said with serious simplicity, " because in
our church we have the envelope system."
When asked what the system was which
thus lifted church-going from the number
of Christian obligations, she explained
I
>m
I
A Letter from Germany.
389
that envelopes marked with each Sun-
day's date were distributed to the con-
gregation, and duly returned with a
quarter inclosed. When she stayed at
home, she sent the envelope to represent
her. The collecting of the quarters be-
ing the pivotal feature of the Sunday's
service, her duty was fulfilled.
With this, and many similar recollec-
tions in my mind, I own I am disposed
to think leniently of Italy's church-door
mendicants. How moderate their de-
mands, how disproportionate their grati-
tude, how numberless their disappoint-
ments, how unfailing their courtesy ! I
can push back a leather curtain for my-
self, I can ring a sacristan's bell. But
the patriarch who relieves me of these
duties has some dim, mysterious right
to stand in my way, — a right I cannot
fathom, but will not pretend to dispute.
He is, after all, a less insistent beggar
than are the official guardians of gal-
leries and museums, who relieve the un-
utterable weariness of their idle days by
following me from room to room with
exasperating explanations, until I pay
them to go away. I have heard tourists
protest harshly against the ever-recur-
ring obligation of giving pennies to the
old men who in Venice draw their gon-
dolas in to shore, and push them out
again. They say — what is perfectly
true — that it is an extortion to be com-
pelled to pay for unasked and unneces-
sary services, and they generally add
something about not minding the money.
It is the principle of the thing to which
they are ruthlessly opposed. But these
picturesque accessories of Venetian life
are, for the most part, worn-out gondo-
liers, whose days of activity are over,
and who are saved from starvation only
by the semblance of service they perform.
Their successors connive at their pre-
tense of usefulness, knowing that some
day they, too, must drop their oars, and
stand patiently waiting, hook in hand,
for the chance coin that is so grudgingly
bestowed. That it should be begrudged
— even on principle — seems strange to
those whose love for Venice precludes
the possibility of fault-finding. The
graybeards sunning themselves on the
marble steps are as much a part of the
beautiful city as are the gondoliers sil-
houetted against the sky, or the brown
boys paddling in the water. Such old
age is meagre, but not wholly forlorn.
A little food keeps body and soul to-
gether, and life yields sweetness to the
end. "It takes a great deal to make
a successful American," confesses Mr.
James ; " but to make a happy Venetian
takes only a handful of quick sensibility.
. . . Not the misery of Italians, but the
way they elude their misery, is what
pleases the sentimental tourist, who is
gratified by the sight of a beautiful race
that lives by the aid of its imagination."
Agnes Repplier.
A LETTER FROM GERMANY.
THE year 1903 was not an eventful
one to Germany in its foreign relations.
It brought, indeed, the conclusion of
the Venezuela incident ; but of the other
large movements that agitated the world,
— the Macedonian outbreak, Russia's po-
sition in Manchuria and the Russo-Jap-
anese imbroglio, the surprising revival of
protectionism in England, — Germany
occupied merely the attitude of an inter-
ested spectator. All the more interesting,
on the other hand, were the home devel-
opments of the year, — the Reichstag
elections, registering the amazing pro-
gress of Socialism ; conditions in the Lib-
eral parties, foreshadowing their possible
390
A Letter from Germany.
reunion and the rejuvenation of Liberal-
ism ; army discipline, the maltreatment
of soldiers, and the doings of military
courts. Less important was the year's
legislation ; while in the economic life
of the Empire the watchword was the
recuperation of business, along with the
consolidation of industrial and financial
interests.
" Our policy in East Asia is to hold
on to what we have and develop it, with-
out burning our fingers in matters that do
not concern us." In these words Count
von Billow rejected the assumption that
Germany should take an active hand in
excluding Russia from Manchuria. Ac-
cording to the Chancellor there is no quar-
ter of the world in which Germany has
less to seek than in Manchuria. This
declaration of policy by Germany's lead-
ing statesman may seem to approach the
utmost verge of modesty, in view of the
fact that Germany seized Kiao-Chau only
six years ago for the express purpose of
extending her trade relations in the Far
East. Nevertheless, it merely extends
to Asia what has grown to be Germany's
traditional attitude toward Russia in the
field of European politics. Ever since
the estrangement between the two coun-
tries growing out of the Berlin Congress,
Germany's policy has been to win back
the confidence of the St. Petersburg Gov-
ernment. Hence, Russia's will must not
be crossed, except upon the very gravest
occasion. In view of possible develop-
ments beyond the Vosges, Germany must
necessarily regard Russia's friendship as
a most valuable asset in her political bal-
ance sheet ; and to transfer it to the side
of liabilities for the sake of wholly prob-
lematical trade advantages in Manchuria
would be moonshine madness. This is
the view that prevails at Berlin, and it
cannot be doubted that it meets the ap-
proval of the vast majority of the Ger-
man people, Herr Bebel to the contrary
notwithstanding. During the embroil-
ment of Russia and Japan, too, this line
of action has been rigidly adhered to.
Germany has maintained a strict neutral-
ity ; no word or act of the Government
has shown where its sympathies lie ;'and
the standpoint of the press, whether in-
spired or other, has been the same. Ger-
many maintained a similar reserve dur-
ing the Macedonian troubles. From the
very beginning she took the position that
Russia and Austria were the two foreign
countries most immediately concerned,
and that they should be given the lead
in shaping the policy of the great Powers
in respect to introducing reforms and re-
moving the reasonable grievances of the
Macedonian population. Berlin, ther
fore, loyally supported every line of
tion agreed upon at St. Petersburg ar
Vienna.
The most notable event in the relatioi
between Germany and the United Stat
during the year was the winding up
the Venezuela incident. While Germany
succeeded beyond expectations in enfor
cing her claims against that vagabond :
public, the feeling here was pretty ger
eral that the game was not worth the i
die, since it aroused in the United Stat
deep suspicions as to Germany's genera
policy for the future in South America ;
and it also brought into bold relief tt
animosity against Germany that had
cumulated in England during the
happy war in South Africa. In sor
quarters, too, the Venezuela affair ws
regretted as having only increased tl:
prestige of the United States in worl
politics, while damaging, rather than ir
proving, that of Germany. This vie\
found expression, at least, in the opj
sition speeches in the Reichstag. Cei
tainly the whole matter did nothing
better the state of German feeling
ward the people of the United States ;
and when the little Panama revolutic
occurred the newspapers pretty genei
ly vented their spleen against us by
nouncing that they heard " the rolling i
the almighty dollar." With all the cod
sureness of subjective journalism, — h
the lack of a decent news-service abroa
A Letter from Germany.
391
— German editors can spin out their dis-
quisitions about the settled policy of the
United States to absorb the whole of
South America ; and American machi-
nations and American money are readi-
ly pressed into service to throw light on
sinister events in that continent where
simpler explanations would be more ob-
vious.
Nevertheless, the Panama revolution
certainly gave satisfaction to the German
Government, and to the saner part of
the press, from one standpoint, — name-
ly, the possibility that it opens for the
construction of the Isthmian canal. It
was doubtless this consideration — along
with the wish to do a friendly act to the
United States — that moved the German
Government to recognize the young re-
public with unusual promptness. The
assumption that has found expression in
a few American newspapers, that Ger-
many would like in some way to hinder
that enterprise, is too fantastic for sober
treatment. On the contrary, she awaits
the building of the canal by the United
States with impatience, since her trade
connections with the west coasts of North
and South America, with Australia and
the German possessions in the Pacific,
can only be greatly improved through
the establishment of this shorter route.
All that I said in this magazine a year
ago regarding the serious situation cre-
ated for us by the new German tariff
law could be repeated here. Indeed,
the prospect for satisfactory trade rela-
tions between the two countries has grown
still more ominous since that time ; for
the probability foreshadowed in my let-
ter of March, 1903, that Germany would
withdraw from us trade advantages given
to other countries under treaty, has now
become a certainty. Indeed, before that
letter appeared in print, Count Posa-
dowsky announced in the Reichstag that
the most-favored - nation clause no lon-
ger exists as between Germany and the
United States, because our action in mak-
ing special concessions to other coun-
tries, in order to secure reciprocity ar-
rangements, amounts to its suspension.
The correctness of this policy has only
been strengthened, from the German
standpoint, through the ratification of
our Cuban Reciprocity Treaty, which
will give the deathblow to Germany's
sugar trade in the United States.
In view of the changed situation
brought about by Count Posadowsky's
announcement, it is high time that our
statesmen should begin to consider what
they can do to secure as favorable terms
for the admission into Germany of our
agricultural produce and other merchan-
dise as other countries will enjoy. No-
thing short of a radical revision of our
tariff law in the direction of giving the
President large discretion to reduce du-
ties in return for equivalent advantages
will enable him to secure to our farmers
and exporters their due place in the
German market. There are no indica-
tions, indeed, that anybody in Germany,
beyond a handful of extreme Agrarians,
wants a tariff war with us. With the
German Government, however, the ques-
tion will not be what it wants, but what
the domestic and foreign political situa-
tion will force upon it. How can it
again succeed in negotiating good com-
mercial treaties with Russia and Austria,
for example, if those countries know in
advance that the United States can have,
without the asking, all the trade advan-
tages that they themselves must haggle
and barter for ? And, at home, how can
it affront the powerful Agrarian parties,
upon which it must rely for general
political support, by making unbought
concessions to the very country that of-
fers the sharpest competition for German
agriculture ? The German Government
is friendly enough toward us ; but, for all
that, the exigencies of home and foreign
politics will compel it to apply to our
goods, in the absence of treaty, rates of
duty which it regards itself as excessive.
Those rates are in the law against its
will ; only our action will enable it to
392
A Letter from Germany,
dispense with applying them against us.
I am sure that the German Government
would be thankful to us if we should re-
lieve it from this unpleasant dilemma.
The passage of a law by Congress to
prevent the pirating of literary and art
productions exhibited by foreigners at
the St. Louis Exposition, made a good
impression here, and corresponds with
the expressed wish of Germans inter-
ested in those lines. There was consid-
erable agitation of the matter when many
manufacturers of art prints refused to
exhibit at St. Louis, on the ground that
they had no protection from virtual theft.
While the enactment of the law, therefore,
has been received with satisfaction, the
latter is tempered by the consideration
that Congress only acted as an after-
thought, in order to promote the material
success of the Exposition, while ignoring
the abiding equities in the matter. In
this connection the German press has in-
dulged in some rather bitter comment
upon the general subject of copyright
conditions in the United States. German
laws, it is complained, give the American
author and artist absolute protection from
piracy, while our Copyright Law requires
the manufacture of books and art prints
in the United States before guaranteeing
protection. It is a standing source of
irritation among German writers that
their stories are habitually reprinted by
German newspapers in America, without
their having any way of securing re-
dress ; and newspaper editors, given to
plainness of speech, hold us up to con-
tempt as "a state with legally author-
ized robbery of intellectual property."
The visit of an American squadron to
Kiel, the Emperor's speech there at the
banquet given by our ambassador at
Berlin, together with his subsequent of-
fer of a cup to American yacht clubs as
a prize for an international race across
the Atlantic, were all events making for
good relations between the two countries.
After reading his speech at Kiel, surely
no intelligent American can doubt the
Emperor's sincere good will for the
United States and its people. The organ-
ization of a thriving American Chambe
of Commerce at Berlin creates anothe
bond between the two lands that promise
happy results for both. I mentioned la
year the fact that many Germans wei
visiting the United States in order to
study our industrial and transportation
methods. Those economic pilgrimages
became in 1903 more frequent and mor
important than ever ; and during 19(
the St. Louis Exposition will cause such
a migration of inquiring Germans on er-
rands of investigation into various fields
of American economic activity as we
have never before witnessed. Indeed,
it is no exaggeration now to speak of the
United States as the economic Mecca of
German manufacturers and students of
affairs. The United States attracts mor
German visitors of this class than
other countries combined ; even impoi
tant lands like England and Franc
scarcely count in comparison. Ever
newspapers that are little friendly to
are now saying that the German write
who undertakes to discuss the large ecc
nomic questions and tendencies of tt
world without accurate knowledge of tr
United States, based upon personal ol
servation, is only a second-rate authorit
and his opinions carry no weight.
Herr Goldberger recently publishe
his study, Das Land der Unbegrenztei
Moeglichkeiten ; and it is highly
ficant of the interest felt here in 01
country that six editions of the bool
were called for in two months, althougl
the Germans proverbially buy few bool
It is no less significant that its tit
speedily became a " winged word "
the fugitive literature of the day. Every-
body is now talking about " Unbegrenzt
Moeglichkeiten " in a thousand different
applications, and everybody is asking
American friends what they think ol
Goldberger's book. These, if they ar
discriminating, have to admit that fc
once a German has taken a too ros
A Letter from Germany.
393
colored view of the United States, that
his keen appreciation of our material
progress and our aptitude for marshal-
ing purely economic forces, has misled
the writer into an optimism hardly war-
ranted by manifestations on higher planes
of our national life. The late Wilhelm
von Polenz also brought out during the
year a book on the United States, founded
on extended personal observations, and
giving full recognition to the finer ten-
dencies in our life, without ignoring our
many shortcomings.
Along with this more careful study of
our country, the exaggerated fear of the
" American Danger " that agitated the
German public several years ago has been
greatly modified. The economic travel-
ers referred to above all came home with
an immense respect for our material re-
sources and their magnificent develop-
ment ; nevertheless, some of them re-
turned with the conviction that Ger-
many's economic position in the world is
not imperiled by our progress. Count
Thiele-Winkler, indeed, was so impressed
with what he saw in our iron industry
that he came home and brought out a
translation of Mr. Vanderlip's pamphlet
on the American commercial invasion of
Europe, adding a preface pitched in a
tone of despondent concern as to Ger-
many's prospects in competition with
American iron and steel manufactures.
Goldberger, on the other hand, boldly
says, " For Germany there is no Amer-
ican Danger." This more confident at-
titude is due to tendencies and events
observed in the United States. It rests
chiefly upon the fact that the costs of pro-
duction with us have risen through high-
er wages, dearer raw materials, heavier
transportation charges ; while the remark-
able growth of labor unions and their au-
tocratic methods for forcing high wages
by multiplying strikes are referred to as
a serious handicap for the American ex-
port trade. The financing of our indus-
trial trusts, their over-capitalization, the
breakdown of the Shipbuilding Trust,
and the forced retirement of the president
of the Steel Corporation deepened the
German distrust of our financial meth-
ods ; while Mr. Morgan's contract with
the British Admiralty was interpreted as
a practical capitulation of the great finan-
cier. He was accordingly treated in the
German press as shorn of his locks, and
was compelled to make sport for the Phi-
listines. Corresponding, too, with this
waning of the American Danger, the
great process of liquidation in Wall Street
made almost no impression on the Ger-
man security markets, notwithstanding
the eager attention given to our stock
quotations.
The pleasant facts already mentioned
as making for satisfactory relations be-
tween us and Germany might convey a
false impression, if left to be considered
alone. Of course there is another side
to the picture, — German chauvinism
and German sensitiveness were sure to
provide for that. An American living
in Germany never ceases to be amazed
at the supersensitiveness of many Ger-
mans in regard to their national dignity.
There is an element here — characterized
by the late Professor Mommsen as " our
national fools, they are called Pan-Ger-
mans " — which is ever on the watch-
towers of the nation's glory, ever seeking
to espy some enemy who but crooks his
finger at the object of their patriotic
adoration. To them it is a deep humili-
ation for their nation when the German
ambassador at Washington goes to the
railway station to bid adieu to the Presi-
dent. When young Mr. Vanderbilt
visited Dantzic last summer at the sug-
gestion of the Emperor, the latter, in
recognition of the American attentions
to Prince Henry, had an unimportant
government official detailed to receive
him and show him objects of interest.
Forthwith the alarm was sounded in a
section of the German press, which sus-
pected their Emperor of bending the
knee to American Mammon ; and the
tempest in the national teapot fumed and
394
A Letter from Germany.
sputtered for weeks. Five months later,
when the incident had sunk out of public
view, it again came up in the Reichstag,
where the Chancellor of the Empire
thought it necessary to make an official
statement about it. Alas, what a petty
incident I am putting into my letter ! —
but how typically German !
German newspapers are never weary
of attributing to our " yellow press " the
blame for whatever unpleasantness may
exist in the relations between the two
countries ; and even weighty professors
of history write for the reviews in sup-
port of this assumption. One of the
specialties of that press seems to be the
invention of stories about Germany ac-
quiring a coaling station somewhere in
American waters. This canard has re-
appeared in so many forms that it has
quite lost its adaptability for inch head-
lines on the American side. Neverthe-
less, it never fails to bring out a chorus
of indignant protests in the German
newspapers ; and I suspect that the in-
ventors of it are subscribers to some
German clipping agency, and take a mean
delight in studying the German echo to
their cheap trick. At any rate, the story
argues no special malice toward Ger-
many, but rather a foolish love for sen-
sation. What we Americans find to ob-
ject to, however, in a part of the German
press, is a more serious matter, — their
brutal disregard of tact in treating of
American affairs, their malevolent gibes,
their studied superciliousness, their gross
exaggeration of our national vices, — but
the list is a long one, and I shall not try
to complete it. What we complain of,
too, is by no means confined to the news-
papers. The following is a mild case :
The Berlin Wagner Society recently pro-
tested against the performance of Parsi-
fal in New York, as it had a perfect right
to do ; but it could not lose this opportu-
nity to express its deep contempt for the
musical taste of New York, thus : " The
sacred legacy that Richard Wagner left
to art is to be thrown away upon hear-
ers in the dollar-land, upon whom the
true spirit of Wagnerian art has hardly
dawned, and doubtless never will dawn."
The Society was bidding for American
support in preventing the " desecration ; "
here we have its conception of how to
win it.
The protectionist revival in England
naturally awakens lively interest in Ger-
many. As that country affords far and
away the largest market for German
goods, the Chamberlain agitation cannot
be viewed with indifference by German
statesmen. The fact, too, has not es-
caped attention here that the erratic
Englishman finds the ground prepared
for his agitation by German help ; for
the anti-German feeling that has sprung
up in England in connection with the
Boer War, impartial writers admit, has
given an immense impulse to that move-
ment. The Germans had in 1903 an-
other striking illustration, too, of the deep
resentment now cherished against them
in England. A group of London capi-
talists was about to join similar groups
of German and French financiers last
spring in organizing the Bagdad Rail-
way, and were only awaiting the sanction
of the British Cabinet for certain features
of the enterprise. That sanction appeared
to be no longer in doubt after the Prime
Minister had spoken in Parliament, show-
ing the desirability of enlisting English
financial support for the undertaking,
rather than leave it to the exclusive con-
trol of the Germans and French. There-
upon a storm of indignant protests was
heard, the old cry of " British interests "
was raised ; and the result was that the
Cabinet faced about sharply and refused
to sanction the project.
The subject most strongly engaging
the attention of Germany just now in its
foreign relations is the negotiation of
new commercial treaties. The old ones
elapse with the current year ; and all
the business interests of the country are
eagerly speculating as to their probable
status under the forthcoming agreements.
A Letter from Germany.
395
It was expected, when the new tariff
law was passed, that some of the trea-
ties could be laid before the Reichstag
within a twelvemonth. Instead of this,
however, one hears only of negotiations
with Russia and Switzerland, with no
indication as to their completion. Mean-
while, the Conservatives in the Reichstag
are interpellating the Government about
them, and demanding that the old trea-
ties, at least, be denounced. How the
negotiations are progressing nobody
knows ; but the impression prevails that
the Russian treaty presents very grave
difficulties.
Indeed, the whole question of the
treaties is involved in the greatest un-
certainty. What the Reichstag will do
with them nobody can predict. The
Socialists, by whose votes the existing
arrangements were ratified, have an-
nounced in advance that they will sup-
port no treaties that increase the price
of the necessaries of life. It is highly
improbable, moreover, that any treaties
that the Government can make will prove
acceptable to the two Conservative par-
ties and the Agrarian element among
the Clericals and National Liberals ; for
they can only be ratified by conceding
heavy reductions from the maximum
scale of duties, — a thing which the Agra-
rians would bitterly resist. It may easily
occur, therefore, that the most reaction-
ary elements in German politics and the
most radical, the Socialists, will unite to
reject the Government's treaties.
What would then happen ? Would
the Government put the new tariff law
into force, or would it — as some free-
trade optimists predict — continue the
present law, after having made agree-
ments with the treaty powers to prolong
existing arrangements ? The former al-
ternative would undoubtedly be exceed-
ingly repugnant to the Government, since
it is fully aware that the high duties
forced into the law against its will would
greatly damage German interests in
many directions. On the other hand,
could it refuse to enforce the law and
take the political risks involved ? Con-
stitutionally, indeed, the Cabinet is re-
sponsible, not to the Reichstag, but to
the Emperor ; and the latter can nega-
tive a law by refusing to promulgate it.
This theoretical independence of the Cab-
inet, however, would hardly embolden it
to break with its own supporters in a mat-
ter where they and their constituents have
such large private interests at stake ; for,
after all, a German Cabinet cannot gov-
ern long without a majority.
Germany continues to round out her
social reform legislation. Hitherto the
various sick funds gave assistance for only
thirteen weeks, while the invalid pen-
sion could be drawn only after twenty-six
weeks of continuous sickness. A new
measure passed last year closes the gap,
so that the working classes are now com-
pletely insured against sickness. Another
measure worthy of mention was the intro-
duction of secret balloting at the Reichs-
tag elections, which the country squires
cannot quite forgive the Government for
carrying through at the repeated demand
of the Radicals and Socialists.
The Reichstag elections showing the
prodigious growth of the Social Demo-
cracy was the largest event of the year
in the national life. Indeed, this gain
of 900,000 Socialist votes in five years
is a most stupendous fact. It marks
a significant milestone in the country's
history, and the national consciousness
has been busy for a half-year in contem-
plating and trying to explain it, — a
milestone to which Germans will long
revert as the starting-point of new con-
ditions in the Empire. Those 3,000,000
votes weigh heavily upon the minds of
men who fancy themselves the appointees
of Providence to keep this mad world
in its social orbit. Something must be
done, they are saying ; " we are on an
express train that is rolling with the
wind's velocity into the Zukunfts-Staat,
and only the Government can save us ; —
let it put on the brakes ! "
396
A Letter from Germany.
How was this Socialist victory possi-
ble ? Was it, in fact, a Socialist vic-
tory? In my letter of a year ago I
said that the cry of " Bread-usury "
would be raised by the party, and its
speakers would everywhere attack the
new tariff law as designed to enhance the
price of the laboring man's necessary
food. Such, indeed, was the case ; the
burden of the Socialists' speeches was
everywhere the tariff ; they and their
enemies are agreed as to that. Apart
from this they made some political capi-
tal out of their treatment by the courts
and the Government, the restrictions
upon the liberties of the working popula-
tion in the matter of their organizations,
and the association of these for common
action ; out of army conditions, mal-
treatment of privates, and the sentences
inflicted by military courts ; finally, out
of the Emperor's speeches against the
Socialists, which they regarded as an un-
warrantable interference by the Crown
in the political controversies of the peo-
ple. All live, present-day matters, —
nothing anywhere about the Utopia of
the Socialists, a state with all industries
nationalized and everybody made happy
under a system of collectivism. Thus
their surprising success was hardly a
victory of Socialism, but rather of radical
Liberalism. Somebody has aptly char-
acterized it by paraphrasing Disraeli's
well-remembered ban mot : the Socialists
caught the Liberals bathing and stole
their clothes.
Under this view the election affords a
sort of bitter-sweet solace for the three
little radical parties, which are being
ground to powder between the upper
and nether millstones of the Reaction
and Socialism. Indeed, it is recognized
on all sides that the Socialist vote was
swollen to its huge volume partly through
the assistance of electors who do not
dream of adopting the creed of that party.
Large numbers of citizens were deeply
disgusted with political conditions in the
Empire, and wanted to give the strongest
possible expression to their protest. They
found the Socialists ploughing with the
Liberal heifer, cutting a much wider fur-
row, too, than the rightful owner, and so
holding out the promise of exterminating
the weeds more speedily and effectively.
Hence, a vote for Socialist candidates
would be the heaviest body blow against
the Government that they could deliver ;
and so they voted. That party was thus
the only one that came out of the elec-
tion with a marked accession of strength.
They gained twenty-one seats, raising
their force in the Reichstag to eighty-
one members ; and they would have one
hundred and twenty-five if the districts
were apportioned according to popula-
tion.
The election then demonstrated anew
and with overwhelming force that So-
cialism is a great elementary movement
in the life of the German people. What
will come out of it ? Did June Sixteenth
register its high-water mark, or was it
the point at which the dike began to
crumble before the inrushing flood ? Can
the rising tide be stemmed in time to
save the State ? Where and how are
the resisting walls to be built? Such
are the anxious questions that people be-
gan to ask themselves last June.
While this perturbed state of the pub-
lic mind was at its height an event oc-
curred which partly relieved its tension.
The yearly convention of the Social De-
mocracy was held in Dresden in Sep-
tember, and presented such a repulsive
picture of dissension and distrust in the
party as to restore in a measure the
equanimity of over-anxious souls. The
Socialist leaders, the laurels of their June
victory still fresh upon their brows, greet-
ed one another there with such ejacula-
tions as " lies ! " " perfidy unparalleled ! "
One " comrade " was denounced as " deep-
ly degraded morally ; " and Herr Bebel,
the fiery Boanerges of the party, was
forced openly to admit, " We were never
more divided than now." Then, too, the
stringency of party discipline, brought
A Letter from Germany.
397
out in the debates where it was shown
that Socialist writers had to apply to the
National Committee for permission to
print articles in bourgeois newspapers,
was pointed to by the foes ot Socialism
as a tyranny that must ultimately grow
intolerable and disrupt the party.
However, while the Dresden Conven-
tion reassured some minds, it was a dis-
tinct disappointment to others. Some
progressive politicians and university pro-
fessors had hoped that the Socialists, in
view of their accession of new followers
from various sections of the urban and
rural population, would depart from their
old policy of narrowly representing the
interests of the proletariat and put their
movement upon a broader basis. That
hope was dashed at Dresden. The Re-
visionists were again voted down by
an overwhelming majority ; Bebel, who
again proved himself the soul of the par-
ty, swept the Convention away with his
declaration of undying hostility to the
existing order of society ; and his resolu-
tions, reiterating that the Socialist move-
ment is a class conflict, were emphatically
indorsed. Hermann Sudermann, always
a pronounced Liberal, thus confessed his
disappointment over the outcome at Dres-
den : " Since the Dresden Convention
the middle-class bourgeoisie is without
hope, without a future."
The strife in the party as exhibited at
Dresden was regarded in some quarters
as foreshadowing its speedy dissolution ;
but the united front presented by it a
few weeks later in the elections for the
Prussian Diet demonstrated anew the
ability of the Socialists to bury their
theoretical differences and go to work.
The Revisionists, under the leadership
of Bernstein, continue to pound away at
the Marxist groundwork of the party's
creed, and perhaps they will crumble it
in time — after Bebel is gone ; but their
faith in State collectivism remains intact,
and harmony at this cardinal point will
doubtless keep the party united and on a
war footing for all practical tasks.
As to the final issue of the Socialist
movement nobody at present can form
an authoritative judgment ; but condi-
tions undoubtedly point to its ultimate
success. The party has now shown its
ability to win support from the peasant-
ry ; it has swept into its ranks vast num-
bers of petty tradesmen and independent
artisans. It is spreading among the
smaller Government officials ; and many
retired army officers, fretting over what
they regard as the premature termina-
tion of their careers, quietly embrace
Socialism. The crowded state of the
professions, too, makes for the spread of
that doctrine ; and the Universities, with
their 37,000 students, are yearly swell-
ing the ranks of the discontented intel-
lectual proletariat which lightly takes to
Socialist views. A recent inquiry brought
out the fact that thirty-one per cent of
the physicians of Berlin have incomes of
less than $750 from their practice and
all other sources. Now, a man living
under these hard conditions is sure to
think earnestly upon the social problem,
and it is almost certain that he will think
radically. Thus the crowded profes-
sions supply the material from which
Socialism continually recruits its intel-
lectual leaders.
Moreover, the foes of Socialism have
apparently learned nothing from June
Sixteenth, and continue to turn water
upon its wheels. In the Reichstag a Con-
servative leader suggested a law for the
disf ranchisement of all Socialists profess-
ing to be republicans and revolutionists.
The Chancellor, indeed, rejected the idea
of special measures of repression, and an-
nounced his intention to enforce existing
laws against open attack, and to extend
social reform legislation ; but he thought it
necessary to give the following warning
to Socialists : " The State will defend it-
self. Who is the State ? If you once
resort to action you will soon find out."
In other words, the final argument is —
the sword. Also, the Chancellor's an-
nouncement that no Government official
398
A Letter from Germany.
who is a Socialist would be retained in
the service of the State will prove but a
blow in the water ; for a discreet silence
can be practiced by the official, as well
as by the soldier. The latter is forbidden
by the regulations to confess himself a
Socialist ; indeed, a perturbed Conserva-
tive leader reminded the Chancellor that
the time was coming when the army could
no longer be relied upon to act unitedly
against that party in an emergency.
The election has started a remarkable
agitation in the four Liberal parties of
the Empire. The impotence of German
Liberalism, through its unhappy divi-
sions, was never more apparent than
now ; and the outcome of the elections
has forced it to serious questionings as
to its future. There is something ex-
ceedingly pathetic in the disappointment
of many of the best minds of Germany,
like that of the late Professor Mommsen,
over the decline of Liberalism and the
apathy of the masses. In answer to an
editor who asked for an expression of his
views upon the result of the elections, the
old historian wrote : " To me it seems
that the battle is definitively lost. . . .
I am too old and weary to give expres-
sion publicly in the press to absolute
hopelessness."
Decimated by the advance of Social-
ism, and weakened by their own fac-
tional quarrels, the Radical Liberals see
their modicum of political influence slip-
ping from them ; whereas the National
Liberal Party, the controller of the Em-
pire's destinies a generation ago, has
more and more lost its Liberal principles,
and succeeded in checking its numerical
decline only by meekly voting for the
measures of the Government. The three
radical groups — the Radical People's
Party, the Radical Union, and the South
German People's Party — were nearly as
strong as the Socialists in the old Reichs-
tag ; now they are not half so strong ;
and even including the National Liberals
they only slightly outnumber the Social-
ists. The weakening of Liberalism and
the advance of Socialism have both tend-
ed in the same direction, so far as their
influence upon the Government is con-
cerned ; the latter, namely, has been
forced to ally itself more closely with the
Conservatives and the powerful Cleri-
cals ; and these latter parties have grown
more disposed to bury their differences
of religious creed, in order to interpose
a common front against the rising tide
of Socialism on the one hand, and intel-
lectual freedom on the other. That the
spirit of the age must be resisted and the
principle of authority upheld are com-
mon articles of political faith with these
parties ; and they are known to cherish
designs against the common schools, as
well as against those bulwarks of Ger-
many's intellectual liberty, the Universi-
ties.
Threatened thus from right and left,
the Liberals are beginning to ask them-
selves what they can do to bring their
principles again into favor. The idea
of reuniting their scattered fragments is
abroad in the land ; the watchword of
a Great Liberal Party has been spon-
taneously given out in many quarters ;
even in the ranks of the National Lib-
erals the idea of union has taken hold, and
is fermenting vigorously. When, how-
ever, the attempt is made to formulate
a common creed for the new party, the
enormous difficulties in the way of union
become painfully apparent. The Na-
tional Liberals, for example, are most-
ly high protectionists, being the party
of the great manufacturers ; the radical
groups, on the other hand, are free-
traders. On other important matters,
like appropriations for the army and
navy, the parties are equally at variance.
However, a modest beginning toward
reunion was made last autumn, when
Pastor Naumann's little National Social
Party was absorbed by the Radical
Union. This move has deeply offended
Eugen Richter, the leader of the Radi-
cal People's Party, who is a stiff Liberal
of the old school, and who boasts that
A Letter from Germany.
399
he has not changed his opinions for for-
ty years. Dr. Barth, the leader of the
Union, realizes that no party can make
headway in Germany which stands in
the way of the national defense, and
which opposes social reform legislation ;
while Richter, with his group, opposes all
increases of army and navy, and still oc-
cupies toward social reform the old stand-
point of laisser-faire. Barth, too, enthu-
siastically espouses the idea of reuniting
the Liberals, while Richter regards this
as a visionary plan, and coldly says,
" Perhaps a great Liberal party will be
possible after some decades." All things
considered, therefore, it seems certain
that the Great Liberal Party will remain
a pious wish.
Dr. Barth has also started a new move-
ment in the radical groups in favor of
an alliance with the Social Democracy,
and has argued his case with great force.
His own party indorsed the idea in a
modified form, and so did the South Ger-
man Radicals ; but the Richter group will
none of it, and evidently the voters are
averse to an alliance with the Socialists.
The latter, on their part, have given the
plan a cold reception ; and apparently
there is no encouragement for German
Liberalism in this direction.
The army was, last year, again the sub-
ject of much discussion and much con-
cern. The country has been treated
within six months to one sensation after
another in the shape of military trials
for the maltreatment of soldiers. On a
recent date a lieutenant was sentenced
for 698 instances of maltreating his men,
and a non-commissioned officer for 1520
instances. These and numbers of other
cases of the kind have made an exceed-
ingly unfavorable impression upon the
country ; and the public mind is appre-
hensive lest conditions in the army are
even worse than revealed by these sen-
sational cases. It was but natural that
this public concern should be reflected in
the recent Reichstag debates, and the
speakers of all parties except the Con-
servatives tried a tilt at the army admin-
istration, which, of course, gave earnest
assurances that the evils complained of
would be rooted out.
It is interesting to note that litera-
ture has already seized upon this new as-
pect of the army for treatment. Hitherto
the officer had figured in fiction and on
the stage mainly as an agreeable social
figure, irresistible to young maidens'
hearts ; now the more tragical note is
caught. Baron von Schlicht has recent-
ly printed nine novelettes under the col-
lective title, Ein Ehrenwort, with the
following bill of fatalities : five officers
resign under compulsion, five shoot them-
selves, and one is killed in a duel. The
most widely read book of the year was
Beyerlein's Jena oder Sedan ? which
casts doubt upon the efficiency of the
army because of the spread of immorali-
ty and luxury therein. It is significant,
too, that active corps commanders are
writing in the magazines against luxury
in the army, and urging the return to the
good old simple ways. Another book,
far less important as literature, but hardly
less sensational than the one just men-
tioned, was Lieutenant Bilse's Aus einer
Kleinen Garnison. It would scarcely
have attracted any attention if it had not
been made the basis of a court-martial
for the author, at which the astonishing
fact was brought out that his realistic
descriptions of moral decay in the social
life of a small garrison battalion were
largely photographic copies from real
life.
William C. Dreher.
400
The Return of the Gentlewoman.
THE RETURN OF THE GENTLEWOMAN.
IT is true she has not wholly left us,
but her presence has grown rare, and at
times she seems vanishing, as fringed
gentians have a way of doing in favorite
meadows, where once there were blue
stretches of them, until a summer comes
when the most diligent searcher is only
rewarded by a scattered half-dozen.
To-day every New England town pos-
sesses localities in whose still stately
mansions lived families spoken of as
" best." These " Best Families " hav-
ing diminished and faded away, their
dwellings stand with closed blinds, or,
it may be, have developed into homes
for the aged, orphan asylums, schools,
places where people lodge and board.
Here and there a house retains its origi-
nal character, and its mistress goes se-
renely in and out. She is surrounded
by souvenirs of the past and the flowers
of her garden, is much given to hospital-
ity and the reading of good books, uses
the most charming English we have ever
heard, and has on all subjects views that
are wise and witty and, withal, consider-
ate and charitable. In brief, — a Gen-
tlewoman.
But it is like the half-dozen fringed
gentians in the meadow. Only now and
then does one find her.
There is a descriptive word of dreary
import formerly applied with freedom to
a Gentlewoman in such moments of ad-
versity as involved the loss of friends
and fortune. In this sad situation one
was apt to call her " decayed," exactly
as if one were speaking of a fallen house
or a ruined castle, instead of a sweet
and gracious soul that would always be
greater than anything that could happen
to it.
Heaven be thanked, this word, in her
connection, is becoming obsolete and not
likely to be associated with her in the
future. The modern Gentlewoman will
have profited by the modern processes
of life and learned how to defend her-
self against evil days.
The fashion of this world passeth,
and it was no doubt decreed from the be-
ginning that a number of things should
cease to exist, that there should be a pass-
ing of the spare room, of the front door-
yard, of the polite art of letter-writing,
of the pleasant companionship of the
horse in drives through town and coun-
try, of that receptacle, once so essential
a part of a woman's dress, the convenient
pocket. The Gentlewoman is not a fash-
ion of this world. She is of that world
that was and is and ever shall be.
But when she comes again, what will
be the conditions ? Will she serve tea
as of old in delicate heirloom china ?
Will her pleasant rooms, hung with an-
cestral portraits, look into a well-kept
garden, rose-planted, and shaded by an-
cestral fruit trees ? Possibly, since the
title she bears implies wealth of years,
and hence opportunities of inheriting
things having the charm of years.
Still the immediate ancestors of the
Gentlewoman of the future are no longer
home-makers in the sense that their own
ancestors were. Many of them are
birds of passage, flitting from one point
to another, collecting memories and ex-
periences in greater numbers than house-
hold treasures or plants in gardens.
They board ; they live in apartments ;
they spend six months here and six
months there ; they give away their old
gowns and coats and hats, instead of
packing them in attic chests to be taken
out half a century later for use in cha-
rades and tableaux and private theatri-
cals. Or if too much occupied, or not
sufficiently well-informed concerning the
need of their neighbors to distribute in-
telligently of their abundance, societies
stand ready to do this for them, societies
The Return of the Gentlewoman.
401
whose business it is not only to dispense
thoughtfully the necessities of life, but
also its feathers and ornaments and
flowers ; as, for instance, that of the " In-
ternational Sunshine " with its motto, —
" Have you had a kindness shown,
Pass it 011 ; " —
which means, literally, if you have a ball
dress, or a fan, or a volume of poems, or
a piece of embroidery lying idle, send it
to us and we will see that it gives plea-
sure elsewhere.
This habit of modern life, so essential
to a Bird-of-Passage Person who has no
hoarding-place save in the hired corner
of a public storehouse, somewhat limits
the future Gentlewoman's chances of in-
heriting ancestral articles. However, all
people of to-day are not birds of passage.
Some there be who have built or bought
themselves housesj and in making the
latter habitable, followed the tendency
of the age to put old wine into new bot-
tles, that is to say, old furniture collected
from the earth's four corners into modern
rooms. Having safely passed the un-
beautif ul period of parlor sets and cham-
ber sets and vases in pairs, they thirst for
unmatched pieces of antiquity. Go into
a twentieth-century dwelling and you
will find chairs and tables that must be
enjoying a sensation of renewed youth,
since in place of growing daily more ven-
erable in native air, they have knocked
about all over Bohemia, and are now
making new acquaintances in a manner
quite unusual with things of their day
and generation. Here is a chair ac-
quired yesterday at a sale of old colonial
furniture from Virginia ; here is a clock
bought last summer in a Dutch fishing
village ; here is a dressing-table that
once crossed the sea in that ship pre-
pared, so the story runs, to rescue the
unhappy Marie Antoinette, and finally
obliged to set sail without her. Here is
an old stool, carved and gilded, and a
spinnet with some yellow music resting
open upon it, — stool found in one town,
spinnet in a second, and music in a third.
VOL. xcui. — NO. 557. 26
If these things, with others, can be kept
together until the future Gentlewoman,
now a child, has herself grown old among
them, her surroundings, in appearance at
least, will in no wise greatly differ from
those of the Gentlewomen of her ances-
tors. The difference will be in the his-
tory of her surroundings.
The other day I heard some one say,
alluding to the death of an aged relative,
" She was the last gentlewoman of our
family." It was as if the speaker had
said, " The last princess of a royal line ;
there will never be another."
And it may be that never again shall
we see Gentlewomen like those now go-
ing from us, as it may be that never
again will there be a field white and gold
and fragrant in exactly the same manner
as the one through which we walked last
June, never again a summer night like
that of last July, when the evening prim-
roses, little sisters to the moon, were
shining along the garden path ; but the
memory of the afternoon in June and of
the evening in the midsummer garden is
ours to keep forever, and each of us has
a heritage bequeathed by the Gentlewo-
man we loved, also to keep forever, if
we can, — a heritage that has nothing in
common with real estate or the safety
deposit bank, that is not subject to dam-
age by fire or flood and yet demands
more care than ever material possessions.
Each year of living means more rush
and more haste, and less time for think-
ing, since the main thing seems to be to
arrive, and to do that one must run faster
and faster. It is well to arrive, and ad-
visable. It is also well to make one's
haste after the fashion recommended by
the German proverb, " Eile mit Weile,"
even at the risk of not arriving at all.
It is safer for the heritage left us by the
Gentlewoman we loved. In the break-
neck speed of modern life there are so
many chances of accidents to things other
than limbs.
Happening to call upon a friend the
other evening at the moment of a dinner
402
Books New and Old.
party, I was shown into the presence of
the young son and daughter of the house,
aged fourteen and thirteen. They gave
me cordial greeting, and after I had
been told the names of the guests in the
dining-room, and we had somewhat dis-
cussed them and wondered how much
longer they would sit at the table, and
talked of the animals at the Zoo and the
birds in the Park and the books we liked
best, the children showed me a picture
that had been occupying their attention
when I entered.
It was a large colored print of a
Christy girl playing golf.
" I am going to have it framed for my
room," said Ruth. " What do you think
of it ? Oh ! I forgot," she added, " you
don't approve of the modern girl."
There was a pretty apology in her
voice, and nothing in her manner to give
the impression that a person in the state
of mind she had indicated might be un-
reasonable or unnatural or otherwise ob-
jectionable. But Richard arose, asking
in a voice that sounded like a challenge,
" Not approve of her, — why not ? "
"Well," I said, "I don't exactly
know. It 's a sort of feeling. Of course
it does n't include every modern girl.
It would never include Ruth. The
young woman in the picture is certainly
bewitching, but I should n't think of giv-
ing such a picture to Ruth for her room ;
or at least I might give one, but not a
whole row of them, there are so many
other pictures to give her " —
Under Richard's clear and questioning
gaze I was growing confused, when Ruth
spoke for me.
"You see, Richard," she said, " yoi
were not with us last August, but thei
was a girl who used to come into the
dining - room with such a stride ! anc
she always wore her sleeves stripped uj
above her elbows, and her arms had gc
fearfully burned ; in fact, they were quit
black, and she was so proud of them ; but
of course they did n't look very well,
pecially at dinner with pretty dresses;
and her hair was rather wild, and she
never wore a hat, not even when she
went into the business part of the town
and she knew a good deal of slang, but
she was a very nice girl, and " — Just
here the dinner party was heard wend-
ing its way into the drawing-room, anc
we three being invited to join it, the
strain of the situation ended.
What makes a Gentlewoman? Put
the question in another form. Whc
made the Gentlewoman ? God ms
her. To say that He made the Societ
Woman, and the Club Woman, and the
Sportswoman with her sisterhood, woulc
be not unlike saying that He made the
town and the steam cars and green ca
nations and gray roses. But we may
quite sure that He made the Gentlewc
man, and that with every generatioi
adopting the best of things new and keej
ing the best of things old, she will retui
in all her sweet dignity to add to the joj
of the world.
Harriet Lewis Bradley.
BOOKS NEW AND OLD.
HANS HOLBEIN AND SOME OTHER MASTERS.
THIS is a lawless age in matters of art
There are as many " schools " as there
three men younger than themselves
Dumas used to say that all he needed fo
are painters clever enough to impose the making of a drama was two trestle
their ideas, or eccentricities, on two or some boards, and a passion. Nowadays
Books New and Old.
403
all that is needed for the making of an
artistic " movement " is a handful of
brushes, some colors, and a new trick. I
remember the first exhibition of the New
Salon, — it was new once. There was
probably not a man there whom some-
body or other was not calling " cher
Maitre." Well, these " schools " dis-
appear. Even Whistler's following, that
wonderful source of Whistlerian sym-
phonies which in essence were neither
Whistlerian nor symphonic, is not to-day
what it was. But while the old cliques
pass new ones arise, and the general ten-
dency of artists to run after this or that
specious novelty is always with us. It
is comforting, therefore, whenever a book
appears like the one which Mr. Gerald S.
Davies has published on Hans Holbein
the Younger.1 This author brought out,
a year ago, a book on Frans Hals which
showed that he was well qualified to as-
sume the duties of an historian of art.
He has knowledge, sympathy, taste, and
common sense. These qualities have
gone to the making of a book on Holbein
which was much needed, for the biblio-
graphy of the subject has hitherto in-
cluded nothing in English sufficiently
comprehensive, nothing embodying all
the fruits of recent research. Wornum's
book is nearly forty years old, and the
last edition of the translation of Wolt-
mann's Holbein und Seine Zeit dates
from 1872. Both works are of value,
but for the preparation of a really defin-
itive biography Mr. Davies has had prac-
tically a clear field. He has entered it
not only well equipped as a writer, but
with all the advantages which modern
reproductive processes could give him.
His illustrations include fine photograv-
ures of the paintings, tinted facsimiles of
the drawings, and good reproductions of
Holbein's decorative designs and of the
Dance of Death.
Somewhere, in contemplating the writ-
1 Hans Holbein the Younger. By GERALD S.
DAVIES, M. A. New York : The Macmillan
Co. 1903.
ings of the Fathers, and the huge mass
of literature based on the firm foundation
they provided, Matthew -Arnold speaks
of the disposition of the man of imagina-
tion, " in spite of her tendency to burn
him," to gravitate toward the Church of
Rome. In spite of its tendency to freeze
him, the connoisseur must always, sooner
or later, gravitate toward the school
whose principles make for law and order.
It does not smother idiosyncrasy, but it
has a way of putting that element of ar-
tistic interest in its proper place. It im-
plies, no doubt, certain renunciations, and
the rank and file in any age, but espe-
cially in our own, find it difficult, if not
impossible, to accept its conditions. But
there have been great masters to whom
the keen airs on the heights most con-
genial to the methods of this school are
as the very breath of life, and Hans Hol-
bein was one of them. He is great, first
by virtue of the clearness of his vision,
and then through the perfection of his
skill in realizing what he saw in terms
of form and color, without even the most
trifling deviation into obscurity or man-
nerism. He, too, made his renuncia-
tions, though it is perhaps more accurate
to say that his works involve renuncia-
tions for us rather than for him, since he
was indubitably unconscious of just what
was sacrificed to the realistic trend of his
genius. The point refers, of course, to
the diminution of the force of the spirit-
ual motive in Holbein by the assertive-
ness of that material fabric which it was
his peculiar gift to express. Mr. Davies
takes a more favorable view of the mat-
ter, but this is due, I fear, to the common
weakness of biographers, who cannot
well live absorbed for a long period in
the works of a single master without un-
consciously seeing them too much with
that master's eyes.
He says of the central figure in the
Solothurn Madonna that " nothing more
womanly, more pure, more gentle, more
sweet, and yet more strong has been given
to us by any painter who has essayed
404
Books New and Old.
this subject and made us richer by this
vision or by that of divine motherhood."
Passing from this to the Meier Madonna
at Darmstadt, he maintains the same at-
titude. It is hard to quarrel with him.
Both pictures have great sweetness and
beauty as religious conceptions. But in
such conceptions the North must yield to
the South, and though a completely Ital-
ianized Holbein would have been a Hol-
bein weakened, it seems to me that ad-
miration of his Madonnas should rest, if
it is to be discriminating, somewhere on
the safe side of the ecstatic. Mr. Davies
is even more provocative in what he has
to say in describing the two panels in
monochrome at Basel, the Ecce Homo
and Mater Dolorosa. Both designs are
powerful, but when this biographer re-
marks that " the figure of Christ in the
Man of Sorrows has, for its expressive-
ness of its great theme, few equals in
Art," he is overstating the case. Is it
really possible, in studying this famous
panel, to place the artist's purely ana-
tomical preoccupation in the subsidiary
position to which it should be relegated ?
I doubt it. The difficulty, and the loss
that it implies, will be made manifest
even more clearly, perhaps, by a com-
parison of the Entombment, also at Basel,
with, say, Mantegna's Dead Christ, in
the Brera, with Michael Angelo's Pieta,
in St. Peter's, or with the latter's beau-
tiful drawing in the British Museum.
Instantly Holbein's want of tragic pas-
sion makes itself felt. But to dwell on
his limitations would be, after all, seri-
ously to distort the perspective in which
Holbein must be seen, and it is pleasant,
in returning to the qualities that give
him his high rank, to find the best pos-
sible light thrown upon them in a pas-
sage by Mr. Davies.
Alluding to the German's realistic
method, which is, " in the hands of any
man of less genius, apt to degenerate into
mere laborious accuracy, or to take the
place and usurp the interest in the picture
which ought to be left for the products
of the higher imagination," he points out
that with Holbein it never takes this
pedestrian turn, and continues : " It is
to him the natural and only method of
expressing himself, — absolute perf ectior
of craftsmanship, in all that he handles
carried into every part of the picture, anc
yet all of it so kept in due relation and di
subordination, because of the dominating
presence of the higher interests and aims
of the picture, that you are unconscioi
until you begin purposely to forget thes
higher interests in order to search int
his way of doing things, that you ai
looking at a work in which industry anc
perfect craftsmanship have borne theii
part in carrying out the master thought"
There is a sure touchstone here, ready
the hand of the student of Holbein ; anc
it is gratifying to observe that Mr. Davit
renders a further service to his reader
laying stress upon the fact that while his
artist's method is wholly unlike that
later painters, such as Velasquez, Fra
Hals, and Van Dyck, " neither method is
righter than the other."
If Holbein's method rests too muc
upon a basis of reality to lift his religious
pictures to the loftiest plane, it serves,
all events, to make him one of the si
preme masters of portraiture. In what
he has to say under this head, Mr. Davit
rarely provokes dissent. His efforts
deprive Holbein of the Dorothea Offer
burg and the Lais Corinthiaca, and
give them to Cesare da Sesto, are moi
zealous and ingenious than convincing
— I do not believe the Milanese eve
saw either of the two, — but in traversii
the bulk of the master's work as a poi
trait painter, he is content to avoid
venturous hypotheses. He might have
taken safely a firmer line in following
Miss Hervey's opinion, rather than that
of Mr. W. F. Dickes, in the curious con-
troversy over the identity of the figures
in the Ambassadors, of the National
Gallery. The main point, however, is
that he does full justice to those incom-
parable portraits, like the George Gyze,
Books New and Old.
405
at Berlin, the Derich de Born, at Wind-
sor, and the Erasmus, at Longford Cas-
tle, which, for insight into character,
heroic simplicity, and beauty of style,
stand as monuments, so to say, to the
glory of realistic art. Holbein is, in
these portraits, a painter if ever there
was one, despite the glib assumption
made in some quarters that only Velas-
quez and one or two others deserve the
title ; yet there is no denying the great
part which a purely linear quality plays
in these very works. Mr. Davies rightly
pays attention to the drawings as of no
less significance than the paintings, for
in Holbein's line, wherever we find it, we
have the most characteristic reflection of
his genius ; in it he illustrates, with crys-
talline clearness, the power of knowledge
and authority in art.
He stumbles over no details, he evades
no problems, but draws with a kind of
naked force, and proves, what it is always
so important to remember, that in the
artistic interpretation of beauty it is not
in the least necessary to be esoteric, or to
torture technique and experiment with
the point or with the brush, until the
truth is lost in a maze of self-conscious
or eccentric " method." In his portraits,
painted or drawn, you have art in its bare
integrity. It is a testimony to the illim-
itable scope of art taken in that estate,
that it still gives the freest sway to indi-
viduality. Holbein is almost scientific
in his precision, but his style remains
one of the most original in the annals of
European painting. He is a standing
protest against the theory that emotion-
al rapture is the only source of great
achievement in art. From his triumphs,
as from those of Raphael, for example,
we may know that intellectual power is
also a key to artistic immortality.
With Holbein the drawing and the
painting are practically interchangeable
if we are pursuing the secret of his art ;
1 The Drawings of the Florentine Painters.
Classified, Criticized and Studied as Documents
in the History and Appreciation of Tuscan
but, with most men, work with the pen-
cil or chalk has meant a more sponta-
neous disclosure of personal qualities than
usually goes with work in oils, and this
circumstance has given to drawings a
special place in the history of connois-
seurship. Such souvenirs of a great artist
have, of course, a strictly historical value,
and are of much practical use in the clear-
ing up of questions of attribution and
the like. But if a study in chalk for
some famous picture or decoration has
much the same curious and instructive
interest as attaches to a poet's first draft
for some famous composition, it possesses,
also, much more than the literary sketch,
an intrinsic charm. The pressure of an
artist's hand upon his crayon is an affair
peculiarly self-revealing ; it is like the
violinist's pressure upon his bow, with
this difference, that your musician must
blend his personality with a definite idea
if he is to make a successful appeal,
whereas, in the case of the artist, it
sometimes scarcely matters whether he
has anything important to say or not ; it
is his way of saying it, it is his accent,
which he can convey in the veriest trifle,
that counts.
Mr. Berenson's work on the Drawings
of the Florentine Painters * possesses un-
usual importance on its scientific side
alone. The two huge volumes — too
huge for mere convenience — were un-
dertaken in a spirit of severe research.
The author has classified his material, he
has threshed out many questions of au-
thenticity, and he has framed a catalogue,
embracing nearly three thousand num-
bers, which constitutes in itself an indis-
pensable work of reference. Surveying
his draughtsmen, from the Primitives
down to ,Pontormo and Rosso, in chro-
nological order, he has annotated their
works with a fullness of detail that places
the student in search of critical informa-
tion deeply in his debt. The facsimiles
Art. With a Copious Catalogue Raisonne". By
BERNHARD BERENSON. New York : E. P.
Button & Co. 1903.
406
Books New and Old.
he gives are among the finest reproduc-
tions I have ever seen ; they are, for or-
dinary working purposes, equivalents for
the originals as nearly exact as could be
desired. But I confess that it is not of
the workshop that I am disposed to think
longest in considering Mr. Berenson's
book. I am grateful for the additions he
has made to the tools of art criticism, but
I am grateful also for the influence which
the volumes must exert in developing ar-
tistic taste where it is too often weak.
I once heard a drawing of Diirer's
criticised because the man it portrayed
was made to appear cross-eyed. Per-
haps the poor creature was really so af-
flicted, but, supposing' that Diirer had
libeled him, we might deplore the slip
without losing sight of the linear beauty
with which the drawing brims over.
Beauty of this sort does not need to be
impeccable as regards fidelity to nature.
In Holbein's drawings truth happens to
be of prime significance. With many
other masters, whether truth be present
or not, our pleasure remains the same. It
is the pleasure which you find in a deli-
cately turned phrase, in an intonation, or
even in a sudden and well-placed silence,
— the counterpart of the omission in
linear art, one of the most potent of all
sources of effect. Line is, in short, a
language by itself, susceptible of being
used for the conveyance of great thoughts
or for the most casual and intimate pur-
poses. The early Florentine fascinates
you by flinging some new and beautiful
creation in all its freshness upon the pa-
per, giving it a poignancy which may
disappear when he comes to elaborate it
into a formal scheme ; or, with the best
intentions in the world, seeking to carry
out a given idea within the limits of a
drawing, he actually ends by leaving
you indifferent to his subject, as subject,
and absorbed in what I may call pure-
ly autographic qualities. Mr. Berenson
well clarifies this point in speaking of
Botticelli's illustrations to Dante. " Their
value," he says, "consists in their being
drawings by Botticelli, not at all in th
being illustrations to Dante," and h
happily remarks of the Florentine
" he loved to make the line run and lea
to make it whirl and dance." Bottice
being what he was, — a poet and a drea
er, — wove his line into beautiful form
and he moves the imagination,
satisfies the eye, in these Dantesq
drawings ; they have the glamour of
fancy as they have the glamour of his
style. But it is the glamour of style thai
we could not afford to do without.
It is the same with all the maste
discussed by Mr. Berenson, and the fi
ought never to be forgotten by the s
dent, since it explains and justifies
survival across the ages, as objects
enthusiasm among artists and collecto
of drawings sometimes very nearly mea
ingless so far as subject is concern
The merest scrap will often exert thi
perhaps sensuous spell upon the disce
ing critic. Witness Van Dyck's c
brated sketchbook at Chatsworth, whic
contains odds and ends of no earthly i
terest save as fragments of that langu
which the painter used when he dash
off a pictorial memorandum, a note o
some masterpiece he saw in Italy,
the other hand, Mr. Berenson's collection
of facsimiles emphasizes once more that
element in Italian art which makes it
unique, the instinctive and often, no
doubt, unconscious expression, on th
part of every painter or sculptor of an
consequence whatever, of a feeling for th
imponderable beauty that seems som
how bound up with all that was finest i
the Italian genius of the golden a
They had something to say even whe:
they were not themselves aware of i
That is, they put into their work ch
acter, distinction, the things that com
from imaginative fervor. It is interesi
ing to place an old Italian study of
limb or bit of drapery beside simil
drawings from any modern studio, n
matter how eminent. The old worl
quivers with inspiration, it has a kind
Books New and Old.
407
soul. The modern work may be all com-
pact of cleverness, it may suggest a won-
derful eye and an extraordinarily skillful
hand, but beside the other it is like an
empty shell. Mr. Berenson gives us
abundant data to support this contention,
confining himself to the Florentines. I
hope the preparation of a similar book
by him, treating of the North Italian mas-
ters, is only a question of time, — and
not simply, I may add, because he writes
about drawings to such good purpose,
but because, in the course of his work,
he has so much to say that is worth read-
ing on the general aspects of Italian art.
His chapters on Leonardo and Michael
Angelo in this book are so suggestive,
they are so rich in the fruits of scholar-
ship, presented with far less pedantry
than has hitherto marred his criticisms,
that they deserve publication in a form
more widely accessible. It might easily
be worth while to publish the text and
catalogue given in these volumes in a
handy octavo, the illustrations being put
in portfolios by themselves.
Mr. Berenson's heroic folios rather
dwarf the other contributions which have
recently been made to the literature of
Italian art, but several of these never-
theless command high respect. I would
place well in the forefront of this com-
paratively minor group of publications
what is, in great measure, an old book,
yet practically a new one, the revised edi-
tion of Crowe and Cavalcaselle's History
of Painting in Italy,1 which has long been
out of print. Though it has never lost
its usefulness, it has been much in need
of correction. Sir Joseph Crowe, be-
fore he died in 1896, had finished the
rewriting of more than a third of the
book, and with the help of the additional
manuscripts he left, and their own not
inconsiderable resources, Mr. Langton
1 A History of Painting in Italy. By J. A.
CROWE and G. B. CAVALCASELLE. Edited by
R. LANGTON DOUGLAS, assisted by S. ARTHUR
STRONG. New York : Charles Scribner's Sons.
1903.
Douglas and Mr. S. Arthur Strong have
undertaken to overhaul this classic of
criticism and bring it abreast of the latest
modern research. The publishers are
giving it substantial if not luxurious form,
numerous good half-tones being used as
illustrations, with a few photogravures.
The edition is to be completed in six
volumes, two of which have thus far ap-
peared, devoted respectively to Early
Christian Art and Giotto and the Giot-
tesques. In the first of these volumes
there are brief sketches of the two au-
thors, in which Mr. Douglas speaks of
them with appreciation not only of their
historical and critical aptitudes, but of
their admirable personal qualities. Crowe
and Cavalcaselle have suffered too much
patronage at the hands of certain later
writers, who, pinning their faith upon
Morelli, have liked to assume that only
from him — or from themselves — could
the student expect to receive the pure
milk of the word. Mr. Douglas, with a
little needless temper, redresses the bal-
ance. The fact is that one has only to
dip into these familiar pages to recall the
services the devoted pair have rendered
in illuminating many a bewildering ques-
tion, and to realize anew with how much
insight and thoroughness they did their
work. Of course to-day they require
editing. In Mr. Douglas's notes on the
Rucellai Madonna, which he prefers to
give to Duccio rather than to Cimabue,
we have a good instance of the desira-
bility of reediting periodically a work of
the sort. But it is noticeable that occa-
sions for the drastic rehandling of any
matter dealt with by Crowe and Caval-
caselle have not been frequent. This
is one of the new art books which the
student could not possibly ignore. With
it must be bracketed the translation,
bearing the hybrid title of The Anonimo,2
2 The Anonimo. Notes on Pictures and Works
of Art in Italy made by an Anonymous Writer
in the Sixteenth Century. Translated by PAOLO
Mussi. Edited by G. C. WILLIAMSON, Litt. D.
New York: The Macmillan Co. 1903.
408
Books New and Old.
of those anonymous sixteenth - century
notes which have been familiar to spe-
cialists in the original, but which have
not hitherto been put into English. They
record the observations of an intelligent
traveler, whose pages are useful inas-
much as they give the original locations
of certain famous works of art, describe
others which have since been lost and may
some day reappear, and give suggestive
hints to the critic hunting down mys-
teries of attribution. The book has been
well translated by Paolo Mussi, and Mr.
G. C. Williamson has discreetly edited
it. This edition contains, moreover, a
number of good illustrations.
A book to be commended not only to
the student but to the layman with artis-
tic predilections is Mr. Charles Holroyd's
Michael Angelo Buonarroti,1 which is
really a translation of Condivi's Life,
with the three famous dialogues by Fran-
cisco d' Ollanda placed at the back.
Modern biographies of Michael Angelo,
like the one which Symonds made almost
but not quite definitive some ten years
ago, are numerous enough, but Condivi's
first-hand narrative has virtues to which
none of his successors can lay claim, and
which make it difficult to understand
why it was not sooner put into English.
It is full of living personal details. The
tragic story of the tomb for Pope Julius
has never been set forth elsewhere with
the direct and vivid touch which we find
in Condivi. Mr. Holroyd supplements
his translation with some chapters of his
own on Michael Angelo's work, exhibit-
ing acumen and an admirable faculty for
the blending of critical with biographical
notes ; and his version of the Portuguese
dialogues rounds out a book which has a
1 Michael Angelo Buonarroti. By CHARLES
HOLROYD, Keeper of the National Gallery of
British Art, with Translations of the Life of the
Master by his Scholar, ASCANIO CONDIVI, and
Three Dialogues from the Portuguese of Fran-
cisco d' Ollanda. New York : Charles Scrib-
ner's Sons. 1903.
2 Donatella. By Lord BALCARRES. New
York : Charles Scribner's Sons. 1903.
much more tangible reason for existing
than is often to be discovered where art
publications are concerned. It is tl
first volume in a series published undt
the general title of the Library of Ai
It has been followed by a monograph or
Donatello,2 by Lord Balcarres, a carefully
written production, supplying guidance
that is trustworthy, but none of the
which it would be good to find in a studj
of such an inspiring theme. Both bool
are attractively made and have manj
half-tone illustrations. Only subjects
the highest importance are to be treat
in the series. It is to include volume
on Titian, Dtirer, Correggio, and Piss
nello, and there are to be others or
groups or schools of painters, as, for ex-
ample, Ghirlandajo and the Earlier Flor
entines, Raphael and his School in Rome
and the Three Bellini and the Earlie
Venetians. The prospectus is exceptioi
ally promising, and the two volume
briefly touched upon above warrant the
assumption that the series will be mail
tained upon a level of serious, authorit
tive workmanship.
Of no popular series, however, is it
safe to predicate absolutely uniform ex-
cellence. In the one, for example, edit
by Dr. Williamson under the title ol
the Great Masters in Painting and Sculj
ture, the Botticelli 8 by Mr. A. Streeter,
which has recently appeared, is a mildly
creditable handbook, but nothing mor
The Michael Angelo Buonarroti 4 oi
Lord Ronald Gower, though painstakii
enough, is, on the whole, rather wooder
The same author's Thomas Gainsbor
ough,5 in the British Artists Series, is
better book, and will serve as a rapc
sketch of the subject ; but it is at bottom i
3 Botticelli. By A. STREETER. New Yorl
The Macmillan Co. 1903.
4 Michael Angelo Buonarroti. By Lord Roi
ALD SUTHERLAND GOWER, F. S. A. Ne
York : The Macmillan Co. 1903.
5 Thomas Gainsborough. By Lord RONAI
SUTHERLAND GOWER, F. S. A. New Yori
The Macmillan Co. 1903.
Books New and Old.
409
commonplace piece of work, and is chief-
ly to be valued for its illustrations, which
include a welcome batch of the paint-
er's drawings and studies. The series
of pocket volumes called the Popular Li-
brary of Art, edited by Edward Garnett,
has thus far preserved, in its modest way,
a good standard. Dr. Gronau's Leonardo
da Vinci * is a first-rate piece of conden-
sation. Less weighty, but thoroughly in-
telligent and readable, are the booklets
written for this series by Miss Lina Eck-
enstein on Albrecht Dilrer,2 by M. Ro-
main Holland on Millet,8 by M. Canaille
Mauclair on the French Impressionists,4
and by Mr. A. B. Chamberlain on
Thomas Gainsborough.6 This series is a
good one for beginners. The monographs
in it are brief, they contain enough infor-
mation, and though published at a small
price are very well illustrated. The last
series I have to mention is the Artist's
Library, in which four new volumes have
recently appeared. Two of them, on
Van Dyck,6 are written by Mr. Lionel
Cust, who has published a large volume
on the Flemish painter, and knows his
subject well. He treats it adequately in
these brief chapters, and at the same time
gives too much the impression of a piece
of clever hack work. Miss Frances C.
Weale's Hubert and John Van Eyck7
is similarly thoroughgoing, and similarly
innocent of the faintest spark of kindling
emotion. The best of the recent publi-
cations in this series is Mr. Herbert P.
Home's Leonardo da Vinci,8 which is
formed of a felicitous translation of Va-
sari's life of the painter, with interpola-
tions by the English critic. It is a some-
what audacious performance, but Mr.
1 Leonardo da Vinci. By Dr. GEOBG GRO-
NAU. New York : E. P. Button & Co. 1903.
2 Albrecht D'drer. By LINA ECKENSTEIN.
New York : E. P. Button & Co. 1903.
8 Millet. By ROMAIN HOLLAND. New York :
E. P. Button & Co. 1903.
4 The French Impressionists. By CAMILLE
MAUCLAIR. New York : E. P. Button & Co.
1903.
8 Thomas Gainsborough. By A. B. CHAM-
Horne knows what he is about, and has
brought some really serviceable ideas and
facts to the completion of his unconven-
tional task. In these books the full-page
illustrations are always at the back, by
themselves. The Leonardo plates are
particularly welcome since they include
some of his drawings.
Every series of popular handbooks on
art that is published nowadays follows
much the same editorial policy. One
may differ from another in size and
price, but all are alike in that all run to
a sort of specialization. It is assumed
that what is wanted by the public ad-
dressed is concise instruction on this or
that famous man. The system has its
merits and its drawbacks. It leads, for
one thing, as in literary enterprises of a
kindred nature, to the useless duplication
by one publisher of projects undertak-
en by another. Furthermore, as the au-
thors engaged are, as a rule, simply good
journeymen, without anything very fresh
or startling to communicate, safe but not
in the least inspiring ciceroni, the ulti-
mate results threaten to be more impos-
ing in bulk than in quality, and we shall
not improbably see many a pretty volume
dismembered for the sake of its illustra-
tions, by those who have found out the
usefulness of a well-ordered scheme of
scrapbooks. In the meantime these in-
numerable little manuals are fertilizing
the soil, — one may cheerfully admit that
without taking them too seriously, — and
it is good to know, moreover, that the
rule of brevity forced upon the writers of
them spares us a lot of highfalutin.
But to whom is the student to go for
general ideas, for the broader edification
BERLAIK. New York : E. P. Button & Co.
1903.
6 Van Dyck. By LIONEL CUST. New York :
Longmans, Green & Co. 1903.
7 Hubert and John Van Eyck. By FRANCES
C. WEALE. New York : Longmans, Green &
Co. 1903.
8 Leonardo da Vinci. By HERBERT P.
HORNE. New York : Longmans, Green & Co.
1903.
410
Books New and Old.
which, when all is said, is more impor-
tant to him than the minutiae of any single
artist's history ? If such ideas are pre-
sent in the more elaborate works, like
those of Mr. Davies and Mr. Berenson
at which we have just glanced, they are
necessarily incidental to analysis of a
leading theme. The few new books in
which masters or schools are discussed
at large are interesting, but not momen-
tous. The Art of the Italian Renais-
sance,1 by Professor Wolfflin, offers a
rational interpretation of a subject often
enveloped by historians in a haze of
metaphysics. The learned author has
common-sense views of Leonardo, Mi-
chael Angelo, Raphael, and the lesser
masters ; and in his explication of the
significance of pure form in their work,
he takes his reader close to the con-
structive principle underlying much of
the most characteristic art of the Re-
naissance. He helps to clear the air of
aesthetic cant ; his artists, when he has
completed his surveys of them, are seen
more as artists in the true sense, less as
the seers and high priests which loose-
thinking writers like to consider them.
Yet the book wants gusto ; it is a shade
too professorial. Klaczo's Rome and
the Renaissance,2 in the agreeable trans-
lation which has been made by John
Dennie, is not so deeply pondered, and
when the author gives rein to his fancy,
inventing conversation with the hope of
lending verisimilitude to his picture, he
is more diverting than instructive. But
the work embodies an excellent idea.
It portrays Pope Julius in his artistic
relations, and the pages on the masters
he employed are written partly in ex-
position of their individual traits, but
1 The Art of the Italian Renaissance. By
Professor HEINKICH WOLFFLIN. New York :
G. P. Putnam's Sons. 1903.
2 Rome and the Renaissance. The Pontifi-
cate of Julius II. From the French of JULIAN
KLACZO. Authorized Translation by JOHN
DENNIE. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
1903.
8 Isabella D'Este, Marchioness of Mantua,
still more with the purpose of reprodu-
cing the atmosphere in which they la-
bored. We have here not a bodv of
technical analysis, but a panorama drawn
with scholarship, flexibility, and a con-
stant feeling for the human aspect of
artistic affairs.
Since they are not strictly works on
art, I may only give a few words to Isa-
bella D'Este, Marchioness of Mantua,8
by Julia Cartwright (Mrs. Ady), and
to the new edition of Beatrice D'Este,
Duchess of Milan,4 by the same author,
but they are, as a matter of fact, worth
a dozen textbooks as aids to an appre-
hension of the conditions under which
art was produced in the time of which
they treat. These great ladies of the
Renaissance patronized the painters,
sculptors, and artistic craftsmen of their
day with ardor and intelligence, and
their biographies contain many passages
showing their relations with the masters,
relations typical of a great epoch in civ-
ilization. The story, delightfully told
by Mrs. Ady, of Isabella's efforts to se-
cure for her collection certain marbles,
an antique, and a Cupid of Michael
Angelo's, that had fallen into the hands
of Cesare Borgia, is exactly the kind
of story to set the reader on a clearer
notion of Renaissance taste and of those
racial springs of high enthusiasm to
which we owe such a wilderness of things
of beauty. Some interesting sidelights
on what the South has done to influence
and color European culture are afforded
by the Book of Italian Travel,5 a com-
pilation in which Mr. Neville Maugham
has put together the impressions record-
ed by famous travelers as far back as
the sixteenth century, and by writers as
1474-1539. By JULIA CARTWRIGHT (Mrs.
Ady). New York : E. P. Button & Co. 1903.
* Beatrice D'Este, Duchess of Milan, 1475-
1497. By JULIA CARTWRIGHT (Mrs. Ady).
New York : E. P. Button & Co. 1903.
5 The Book of Italian Travel (1580-1900).
By H. NEVILLE MAUGHAM. New York : E. P.
Button & Co. 1903.
Books New and Old.
411
near our own time as Symonds and Henry
James. The patchwork is the outcome
of wide but judicious reading, and is
deftly arranged. It may not overwhelm
the reader with a flood of those general
ideas for which he is looking, but it will
put him in a frame of mind, giving him
something of that glamour of Italy which
never comes amiss in the study of Italian
art. The efficacy of Cellini's Autobio-
graphy as a means of initiation into the
spirit of the Renaissance is a common-
place of criticism. Miss Anne Macdon-
ell has newly translated this classic of
picaresque and artistic literature,1 and
though she has not shaken my loyalty to
Symonds's version, I confess that her
animated treatment of the text is very
beguiling. She has a pointed note on
Cellini's portrait, discrediting the fami-
liar image of a " white-bearded, benevo-
lent person," the one prefixed to Sy-
monds's translation, and identifying with
Cellini a certain head, which she repro-
duces, in a fresco by Vasari in the Pa-
lazzo Vecchio at Florence. The portrait
bears out her contention. It is of a " vig-
orous, fiery man," and readily persuades
us that in it we have, as Miss Macdonell
asserts, " our Benvenuto to the life."
Mr. La Farge's Great Masters 2 is a
collection of papers on Michael Angelo,
Raphael, Rembrandt, Rubens, Velas-
quez, Dtirer, and Hokusai, which were
originally written for a popular maga-
zine, and have the qualities essential in
discourse addressed to a large and mis-
cellaneous audience. The author avoids
technical jargon, and, though writing
from the artist's point of view, gives to
his fellows a perfect illustration of the
way in which to appeal to laymen with
no risk of being misunderstood. Indeed,
if the book errs anywhere it is on the
side of simplicity. The history of each
1 The Life of Benvenuto Cellini. Written
by Himself. Translated out of the Italian with
an Introduction by ANNE MACDONELL. New
York: E. P. Button & Co. 1903.
artist is carefully traversed, and his sa-
lient characteristics are clearly indicat-
ed. Here and there an observation, re-
minding us that the author has views of
his own, ripples the surface of the expe-
ditious and businesslike narrative, but the
tone of the book as a whole is neither as
original nor as stimulating as Mr. La
Farge's previous excursions into art criti-
cism have caused one to expect. He has
gained much in clearness of style, but
while his book should prove beneficial
when placed in quite inexperienced hands,
it leaves the reader who has made any
artistic investigations at all practically
where it finds him. A popular introduc-
tion to the study of some of the masters,
as well written as this is, could not but be
a credit to any one, even to a painter who
is himself a master. Yet it would be a
great gain if Mr. La Farge were to give
his pen to flights worthier of his powers,
if he were to write a book taking a wider
sweep and going deeper into the subject.
In place of the rich banquet for mature
minds which he might spread, he has set
forth the mild fare suited to the naive
young reader, and, coming from him, it
inspires gratitude tempered, with regret.
I cannot grudge the multitude of undisci-
plined seekers after artistic instruction
the benefit and pleasure they will de-
rive from these pages, but it is impossi-
ble to suppress a wish that Mr. La Farge
might at least have given them a freer
scope.
He is not the only American who has
of late been occupied with the public dis-
cussion of artistic topics. Mr. Lorado
Taft has written an excellent History
of American Sculpture 8 in a new series,
treating of all the manifestations of art
in this country, which is being edited by
Mr. John C. Van Dyke. We have no
other book covering the field so thor-
2 Great Masters. By JOHN LA FAROE. New
York : McClure, Phillips & Co. 1903.
3 The History of American Sculpture. By
LORADO TAFT. New York : The Macmillan
Co. 1903.
412
Books New and Old.
oughly. Mr. Taf t treats in chronological
order all of our sculptors down to the
men who are still living, and he has
given his book the more authority by tak-
ing pains to avoid too enthusiastic or too
severe a tone. He is just to exploded
reputations, he loses sight of nothing that
is good in the work of artists generally
so feeble as Hiram Powers, or Harriet
Hosmer, and he does not lose his head
when he is talking about either St. Gau-
dens or French. A truthful, sober book,
which places the American school of
sculpture in a clear light, and supplies
the information that is needed about all
its members, famous and obscure. With
Mr. Whistler, of course, the makers of
books are already busy, but not, so far
as the first fruits of their labors go to
show, to very good purpose. Mr. Arthur
Jerome Eddy's Recollections and Im-
pressions of James A. McNeill Whis-
tler * is an ill-formed collection of anec-
dotes and other miscellaneous data. It
contains a quantity of raw material which
some future biographer may find useful,
but it is neither serious biography nor
soundly reasoned criticism ; it belongs
in the category of distinctly ephemeral
productions. The illustrations are good
photogravures. The Art of James Mc-
Neill Whistler,2 by Mr. T. R. Way and
Mr. G. R. Dennis, has likewise the de-
fects of the " occasional " publication ;
it is superficial and scrappy, but the au-
thors keep to a dignified key, and one of
them, Mr. Way, through his personal re-
lations with Whistler, has been enabled to
contribute some interesting information
to the volume, especially with reference
to his work in lithography. This book
contains many illustrations that have not
hitherto been accessible to the student.
Whistler's own book, the Gentle Art of
1 Recollections and Impressions of James A.
McNeill Whistler. By ARTHUR JEROME EDDY.
Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Co. 1903.
2 The Art of James McNeill Whistler. An
Appreciation. By T. R. WAY and G. R. DEN-
NIS. New York : The Macmillan Co. 1903.
Making Enemies,3 has just been brought
out in a new edition with some additional
matter, notably the catalogue of the fa-
mous exhibition of Nocturnes, Marines,
and Chevalet Pieces, in which the artist
repeated his trick of discomfiting his crit-
ics by reproducing, with ingenious malice,
the comments on his work in which they
had had the misfortune to indulge. I
have so recently discussed the volume in
these pages that I merely call attention
now to the fact of its reappearance.
Mr. Whistler's brilliant fellow coun-
tryman, the painter whose fame not only
equals but has threatened to overshadow
his own, the painter whose Carmen-
cita figures no less triumphantly in the
Luxembourg than the famous Portrait
of the Artist's Mother, has been made
the hero of a book which for divers de-
lightful reasons can only be characterized
as astonishing. The Work of John S.
Sargentr R. A.4 is, in a way, unique.
Other modern men have been celebrated
in books, and some of them have deserved
the honor. Paul Baudry, for example,
was the kind of artist to bear the severe
test of an exhibition of his works within
the covers of a book, and Ingres has
more than deserved the beautiful tribute
paid him not long ago through the devo-
tion of M. Lapauze in getting his draw-
ings reproduced. But Mr. Sargent's
case remains an extraordinary one. He
has withheld from this volume a great
number of his paintings, and he still has
years of activity before him. Yet in a
selection from his works — including
many of his best things, but still only a
selection — there is enough genius to
keep a dozen ordinary men going all
their lives.
Mr. Sargent has something of the fe-
cundity and the power of the old masters.
8 The Gentle Art of Making Enemies. By
JAMES MCNEILL WHIST LEB. New York:
G. P. Putnam's Sons. 1903.
* The Work of John S. Sargent, JR. A. With
an Introductory Note by Mrs. MEYNELL. New
York: Charles Scribner's Sons. 1903.
Books New and Old.
413
Whether or not he will ever attain to
their rank is an interesting problem.
If he falls short of it, it will be, I think,
because of his limitations as a colorist,
and because of his want of spiritual
depth. On other grounds he moves us
already as we are moved by the great
executants of the historical epochs. This
collection of sixty large photogravures is
dazzling to the eye somewhat as the col-
lection of paintings by Frans Hals in the
little old building at Haarlem is daz-
zling. To keep the latter memorable as-
semblage of portraits in the mind's eye,
as one considers the portraits in this
book, is to revive dubiety as to Mr. Sar-
gent's ever standing on equal terms with
the Dutchman. The latter has a broader
humanity. His art, for all that it is so
thoroughly realistic, goes deeper. Yet it
might fairly be argued that Hals's sin-
cerity, as we see it, draws a great deal of
its virtue from his models, and that the
feverish flush on the modern man's work
is there just because he is a modern man,
— in other words, that the restless bril-
liancy so characteristic of Mr. Sargent is
but the natural expression of the leading
traits in the world he depicts. This much
is certain, that no painter of his time
could face the future with more confi-
dence in its verdict than Mr. Sargent is
justified in feeling. He knows what he
wants to do, and he knows how to do it.
He paints his sitters with a fluency that
no other living artist can rival, and it is
not the fluency of the merely clever man,
it is that of a positive master.
His range promised at one time to be
wider than it seems to-day. He painted
canvases like the Carnation, Lily, Rose,
and El Jaleo, and in them approved
himself a true maker of pictures. But
long after, when he undertook the deco-
rations for the Boston Public Library,
he got out of his depth, and it is per-
haps fortunate that since he has aban-
1 Bryan's Dictionary of Painters and En-
gravers. Edited by G. C. WILLIAMSON, Litt. D.
New York : The Macmillan Co. 1903.
doned the pictorial ambitions of his ear-
lier years he has devoted himself more to
portraiture than to anything else. There
he gives play to his inborn gifts with the
ease and buoyancy of some giant exult-
ing in his strength ; he grasps, without
apparent effort, one individuality after
another, covers scores of canvases with
seemingly inexhaustible fertility of de-
sign and unchanging sureness of hand,
and never for a moment ceases to exert
the fascination of an original and splen-
did style. He is spectacular, if you like,
but there is not a trace of vulgarity in
the spectacle. Like the giant aforesaid,
he is a type of materialism triumphant.
But his is a materialism wonderfully
refined by intelligence and taste, and if
on opening this book of reproductions
one is seized with an emotion of unques-
tioning admiration, one closes it with
feelings of the most thoughtful respect.
It is a pity that the plates are accompa-
nied by an essay by Mrs. Meynell, whose
delicate affectations are totally inappro-
priate to the occasion. Mr. Sargent's
work is too masculine, too brilliant, to
be made the subject of pretty vaporings.
The half-dozen publications to which
brief allusion remains to be made are
works of reference or books of special
interest to collectors. Two of the five
volumes in which the new edition of
Bryan's Dictionary of Painters and En-
gravers 1 is to be completed have thus
far appeared. A revision of the text
has for some time been required, and
many omissions have needed to be re-
paired. Dr. Williamson is bringing the
book up to date with judgment, and the
publishers are greatly enhancing its
interest by filling it with full-page illus-
trations, though a rather arbitrary mode
of selection slightly discounts their good
intentions. Some of the plates seem
only to reflect the editor's whim. The
Sculptures of the Parthenon,2 by Dr.
2 The Sculptures of the Parthenon. By Dr.
A. S. MURRAY. New York: E. P. Dutton &
Co. 1903.
414
Books New and Old.
A. S. Murray, gives in a few terse chap-
ters a vivid description of the marbles,
with explanations, never idly speculative,
of their significance. The illustrations
have been prepared with solicitude for
the interests of the student following his
researches in his own library. They
have been planned so that he may ex-
amine the sculptures in their decorative
and architectural relations, no less than
for their individual character, as nearly
as possible as though he were looking at
the Parthenon itself.
Mr. J. J. Foster's Miniature Paint-
ers, British and Foreign, with Some Ac-
count of Those who Practised in Amer-
ica in the Eighteenth Century,1 a work
in two handsome volumes, contains well-
written text and some very useful lists,
but for collectors the significance of the
book lies largely in its plates, which re-
produce more than two hundred exam-
ples. In the department of prints two
good books have been issued. Mr.
Cyril Davenport's Mezzotints 2 appears
in the Connoisseur's Library, a series
practical in aim and luxurious in form.
The author of this volume writes with
authority on the technical side of his
subject, and discourses pleasantly on the
engravers whose works he describes.
The plates are beautiful photogravures.
Samuel William Reynolds,8 by Alfred
Whitman, deals at length with an Eng-
lish master of mezzotint, to whom, of
course, Mr. Davenport can only give a
limited amount of space. This volume
also is fully illustrated. The two indi-
rectly draw attention to a fashion of col-
lecting which has become a fad. The
high prices paid in the auction room for
eighteenth-century mezzotints are out of
all proportion to their intrinsic value.
But the best plates of the best men have
unquestionably great beauty, and appre-
1 Miniature Painters, British and Foreign,
with Some Account of Those who Practised in
America in the Eighteenth Century. By J. J.
FOSTER. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co.
1903.
ciation of them cannot fail to be greatly
furthered by the books I have just men-
tioned.
Royal Cortlssoz.
ONE of the latest evidences of growing
The Tsne- American civilization is the
ment House . ., , . ,
Problem. interest manifested in housing
reform. Stimulated largely by the work
of the New York Tenement House Com-
mission of 1901, many cities are now in-
vestigating their slums and framing laws
for their improvement. The importance
of this awakening is emphasized by the
growth of immigration and by the change
in its character. The congested sections
of our large cities are populated mainly
from the immigrant ships. In New York
the connection has always been so close
that popular movements for tenement re-
form have almost invariably followed pe-
riods of the largest immigration. These
uprisings against the physical shortcom-
ings of the city have been about as fre-
quent, and, as far as lasting results are
concerned, almost as ineffectual, as the
periodical outbursts against its govern-
mental failings. The one commission
that resulted in widespread and perma-
nent betterment was that appointed by
Governor Roosevelt in 1900. Its most
active members were its chairman, Mr.
Robert W. de Forest, and its secretary,
Mr. Lawrence Veiller. They directed
the investigations that formed the basis
of the law ; and the law itself, incorporat-
ing the new Tenement Department, was
framed by them. They were promptly
selected by Mayor Low as the organizers
and administrators of the new depart-
ment, which, under their supervision, was
one of the strongest features of the reform
government. Their most recent service
to the cause of housing reform is two
exhaustive volumes on the Tenement
2 Mezzotints. By CYRIL DAVENPORT. New
York : G. P. Putnam's Sons. 1903.
8 Samuel William Reynolds. By ALFRED
WHITMAN. New York: The Macmillan Co.
1903.
Books New and Old.
415
House Problem,1 which present a graphic
description of existing conditions in New
York, a concise and reasonably thorough
record of the seventy-five years' agitation
which finally resulted in the law of 1901,
and a large amount of cognate material
on tenement conditions both in this coun-
try and in Europe.
It is evident at once that Chicago,
Boston, and other leading American cit-
ies, herding a large impoverished popula-
tion, have everything to learn from the
experience of New York. The prepon-
derant space allotted to the metropolis
does not detract from the general inter-
est of the book. It is true that Man-
hattan Island's tenement situation is
unique ; but the same tendencies are at
work elsewhere. The city is useful es-
pecially as a warning. It is a horrible
example of what a metropolis can be-
come, once vested interests, with abun-
dant opportunity for employment, are
given free scope. In spite of the excel-
lent results accomplished under the De
Forest law, the tenement problem in
New York is, to a considerable degree,
insolvable. The mischief, in great sec-
tions of the city, has already been done.
The East Side, the abiding place of not
far from 600,000 Jews, 200,000 Italians,
and scattering representations of other
races, is almost entirely built up with the
worst type of tenement. The same is
true of other congested areas. These
buildings are far more profitable than
any that could replace them, because
they hold at least one third more people.
They will not be demolished except by
municipal action, — a contingency not
immediately possible, — and they must
therefore continue to house the bulk of
the city's poor. Such parcels of unim-
proved land as remain will, under the
new law, be built up with sanitary tene-
ments ; and the future of the now vacant
outlying sections is also assured. But
1 The Tenement House Problem. Including
the Report of the New York State Tenement
House Commission of 1900. By Various Writ-
for the most part the city must remain
as it is. It is an extreme evidence of
the fathers' sins visited upon the chil-
dren. In Manhattan Island to-day we
see the results of a century's neglect.
Had the repeated warnings of public-
spirited citizens, philanthropic organiza-
tions, and state and municipal commis-
sions been heeded, the poor people of
New York, instead of being among the
worst housed in the world, would have
been among the best. The present vol-
umes review the repeated attempts made
to secure better ventilated and more sani-
tary tenements. As far back as 1842
Dr. John H. Griscom, the City Inspec-
tor of the Board of Health, attempted to
rouse public interest in the subject, the
evils he described being substantially
those that exist to-day. The report of
the first Tenement Commission, that of
1853, devoted much space to one of the
city's most notorious tenements, — a cer-
tain Gotham Court on Cherry Street.
This structure was not destroyed until
1896. Some gain resulted, of course,
from the numerous agitations extending
from 1842 to 1900 ; but real tenement
reform begins at the latter date. That
is, it was not until then that the build-
ers were forced to abandon the old tene-
ment type, and to begin the construction
of large, well-ventilated, fire-protected,
many-family dwellings.
A distinction should be made between
tenement evils and bad housing. Lon-
don, for example, which has compara-
tively few tenements, is famous for its
slums. The working people live for the
most part in small two and three story
dwellings. The chief problems are over-
crowding in single rooms and lack of
adequate sanitation. In New York, on
the other hand, the poorer classes live al-
most exclusively in four, five, and six story
tenements, usually built upon a 25-foot
lot, each floor divided into four two and
era. Edited by ROBERT W. DE FOREST and
LAWRENCE VEILLER. Two volumes. New
York : The Macmillan Co. 1903.
416
Books New and Old.
three room apartments. The only rooms
in these structures receiving direct light
and air are those facing the street and
the yard. Those in the interior are al-
most entirely without ventilation. Their
occupants are thus deprived of the two
gifts of nature which, perhaps above all,
make for health and happiness, — fresh
air and sunshine. Life in these build-
ings is practically one long Arctic twi-
light. The development of an entire
city along these lines, and the consequent
dwarfing of the physical and moral na-
ture of at least one half its population,
would seem a fearful reflection upon
American twentieth-century civilization.
This, however, is the tenement problem
of New York. It is evident at once that
it is difficult of solution. Insanitary two
and three story dwellings can be de-
stroyed, and replaced with model cot-
tages. This is the favorite method of
correcting bad housing in England. But
the razing of whole tenement blocks, each
populated by 2000 or 3000 people, is too
drastic and expensive a process for this
generation. The proper treatment evi-
dently is not correction, but prevention.
Thus the experience of New York is
of the utmost importance to other cities.
It is true that tenement evils, as described
above, have not developed elsewhere to
the same alarming degree. Compared
with Europe, housing in American cities
is almost ideal. Mr. Veiller has inves-
tigated twenty-seven municipalities, and
finds even the beginnings of a tenement
house problem in only six. These, be-
sides New York, are Boston, Pittsburg,
Cincinnati, Jersey City, and Hartford.
Bad housing conditions are found occa-
sionally elsewhere ; but the wholesale
erection of tenements, except in the cities
mentioned, is unknown. This general
immunity, however, is not likely to last.
The poor of Chicago are housed mostly
in one and two story dwellings. A few
of the orthodox New York double-decker
tenements, however, began recently to
appear. Had Chicago followed the ex-
ample of New York, the portent would
have been officially ignored ; and, in a
few years, a tenement system would have
been deep-seated. The City Homes As-
sociation, however, made a thorough in-
vestigation, and secured the passage of
a tenement act closely following that of
New York. As a result, Chicago can
never become a city of insanitary tene-
ments. Other places, even those where
the " tenementization " process has not
begun, have thus forever forestalled it.
Mr. Veiller finds fairly satisfactory hous-
ing conditions in Cleveland. About five
per cent of the houses are occupied by
more than one family. Yet the citizens
of Cleveland are now framing a law
based upon that of New York. Thus
Cleveland again can never become a
city of insanitary tenements. Here and
elsewhere the same tendencies, unless
checked in time, threaten to duplicate
the New York conditions. All our large
cities have poor and ignorant populations
which must be housed. They all have
rich and not over - scrupulous property
owners and builders, eager to invest their
money at profitable rates. The danger
increases every day, with the growth of
an especially benighted class of immi-
grants. These immigrants not only fur-
nish the tenants, but the real estate spec-
ulators, the builders, and the landlords.
Thus thousands of the tenements of New
York are owned by Jews, Germans, and
Italians, who fight hard whenever the
system is attacked. Such antagonisms
will not be aroused in cities in which the
tenement has not developed. Land prices
are not predicated upon the possible
construction of many-storied dwellings ;
and, in other ways, property interests are
not greatly involved. The present is
thus a favorable time for those cities that
have no tenement laws to pass them.
Reform in this particular case should
properly begin before there is anything
to reform.
Burton J. Hendrick.
Books New and Old.
417
THE series of essays which Mr. Wood-
America In berry here assembles 1 consti-
Literature. tutes a fairly complete though
extremely compact summary of Ameri-
can literary activity and achievement.
The activity has been considerable, he
decides, the achievement in pure litera-
ture small. American readers who have
been brought up to a theory of patriot-
ism which holds that one can hardly be
loyal to the flag without exaggerating,
among other things, the feats of Ameri-
can authorship, will not be pleased with
these papers. The writer does not scru-
ple to assert that our production of work
which possesses some absolute literary
value begins with Irving. He professes
no reverence for " the received tradition
of our colonial literature which has so
swelled in bulk by the labors of our liter-
ary historians." He has no mercy even
upon those few colonial relics in which,
many of us think, a true spark is to be
discerned. " What of the Day of Doom,
The New England Primer, and Poor
Richard's Almanack, and the other
wooden worthies of our Noah's Ark, sur-
vivors from the Flood, archaic idols ?
These are relics of a literary fetichism,
together with Franklin's Autobiography
and Edwards's On the Freedom of the
Will, except that the great character of
Franklin still pleads for one, and the
great intellect of Edwards for the other,
with a few. They do not belong with
the books that become the classics of a
nation." Here Mr. Woodberry is speak-
ing of literature in the polite sense ; else-
where he more commonly uses the word
to mean any utterance in print of any
human activity. So in speaking of New
York he says : " In no other city is the
power of the printed word more im-
pressive. The true literature of the city
is, in reality, and long has been, its great
dailies ; they are for the later time what
the sermons of the old clergy were in
1 America in Literature. By GEORGE E.
WOODBERRY. New York : Harper & Brothers.
1903.
VOL. xcin. — NO. 557.
27
New England, — the mental sphere of
the community ; and in them are to be
found all the elements of literature except
the qualities that secure permanence."
The paper on the Knickerbocker Era
is the most finished and adequate of the
four chapters which deal with special
periods. The power of Mr. Woodberry 's
style is in general cumulative rather than
episodical ; yet there are pithy phrases
of his which stick in the memory : " It
is hard in any case to localize Bryant.
... That something Druidical which
there is in his aspect sets him apart."
..." Drake and Halleck stand for our
boyish precocity ; death nipped the one,
trade sterilized the other; there is a
mortuary suggestion in the memory of
both." ..." Every metropolis, how-
ever, breeds its own race of local writers,
like mites in a cheese, numerous and ac-
tive, the literary coteries of the moment.
To name one of them, there was Willis ;
he was gigantic in his contemporaneous-
ness."
Mr. Woodberry's treatment of the
New England period, or, as he has it, the
Literary Age of Boston, is far slighter ; it
reminds us that the present book is a
collection of separately published essays,
and not a composition of chapters. For
the book, it is unfortunate that the scale
of the Knickerbocker paper should not
have been maintained. The material at
the critic's disposal here (he includes
the Cambridge and Concord writers and
Whittier) would seem to be quite equal
in importance to all the rest of his sub-
ject matter. His discussion of Emerson,
Hawthorne, and Longfellow, the three
in whom " the genius of the people,
working out in the place and among the
things of its New England nativity,
reached its height," is full and satisfy-
ing. But we are not quite prepared
to find Thoreau disposed of with a bare
mention, and Holmes, Whittier, and
Lowell each hit off in a brief paragraph.
We should have liked some qualification,
or expansion of some of his judgments,
418
Books New and Old.
as this of Holmes : " Such a writer is sel-
dom understood except by the generation
with which he is in social touch ; magnet-
ism leaves him ; he amuses his own time
with a brilliant mental vivacity, but there
it ends." There should end, by this
same token, one reflects, your Horace,
your Pepys, your Lamb, all your blessed
provincials, whether rural or town-made,
who have made shift to keep their audi-
ences thus far.
He has much to say of Southern writ-
ers, and little to say for them. Simms
composed " facile and feeble poems ; "
Timrod had, " like the whippoorwill, a
thin, pathetic, twilight note ; " Hayne,
" one would rather liken to the mocking-
bird, except that it does no kind of justice
to the bird ; " Lanier, with his " emotion-
al phases . . . seems like Ixion, embra-
cing the cloud." Poe, finally, is " the one
genius of the highest American rank who
belongs to the South."
The tone of these judgments would
seem less severe if it did not chance that
in the ensuing essay on the West, the au-
thor places much stress upon the agree-
able wild notes of Joaquin Miller, and
upon the " pietistic " romancer, Lew
Wallace. The moods of the two essays
seem to be somewhat different. The
Southern writers are attacked upon the
stern ground of literary merit ; the West-
ern writers are forgiven much because
they seem to embody the Western spirit.
The volume is, we may repeat, a collec-
tion of essays, not a treatise. The final
chapter, in which the discussion of gener-
al " results and conditions " is no longer
hampered by the necessity for personal
estimates, conveys an impression of en-
tire consistency. In it the author's mys-
ticism, his profound faith, are seen to
mellow and ennoble the sobriety of his
attitude toward what has been and what
is : " Special cultures arise . . . and min-
gle with currents from above and under,
and with crossing circles in the present ;
and the best that man has found in any
quarter, nationalized in many peoples,
takes the race and shapes it to itself after
its own image, and especially with power
in those who live the soul's life. . . . But
now in our own time, and in this halt of
our literary genius, it is plain that our
nobler literature, with its little Western
afterglow, belonged to an heredity and
environment, and a spirit of local culture
whose place, in the East, was before the
great passion of the Civil War, and, in
the West, has also passed away. It all
lies a generation, and more, behind us.
The field is open, and calls loudly for
new champions." H. W. £.
URBANITY of manner, breadth of
Mr. Matte's yiew> tolerance of temper, and
Latest Book. a kindly, easy, genial attitude
toward life, — these are the qualities
ascribed to Irving in the latest book by
Mr. Mabie. Fortunate is the man of let-
ters who possesses them ; they account in
part for the charm of Backgrounds of Lit-
erature,1 but they also serve to explain the
ungracious and perhaps illogical irritation
with which some of Mr. Mabie's readers
will close the pages of his attractive vol-
ume.
There is no question of Mr. Mabie's
competency for commenting upon the
natural and social surroundings which
have affected the work of these seven
well-known, although quite unrelated au-
thors. He is a man of wide reading, of
swift and sympathetic observation. A
long row of popular books already bears
witness to his facility of expression. In
the present volume, the easiest task was
to describe the Lorna Doone country, and
the most difficult was to analyze the
American spirit in the poetry of Walt
Whitman. Both papers are extraordi-
narily well done. The constructive criti-
cism of Whitman is quite as skillful in its
complex workmanship as is the essential-
ly slight but pleasing record of the obvi-
ous emotions of a sentimental tourist in
1 Backgrounds of Literature. By HAMILTON
WRIGHT MABIE. New York : The Outlook Co.
1903.
Books New and Old.
419
the Doone valley. Goethe, Scott, Words-
worth, Irving, and Emerson are the sub-
jects of the other papers. That they are
graceful and well-informed goes without
saying. The better one knows Weimar
and Edinburgh and Concord the better
one realizes how admirable these essays
are up to a certain point ; but the great-
er also is one's regret that Mr. Mabie so
rarely chooses to go beyond the bounds
which he has set for himself.
An author's choice of company is of
course his own affair ; as far as conscious
election plays a part in it he may write
for posterity or for " antiquity " as he
prefers. Mr. Mabie early chose the mod-
est and useful part of preaching the gos-
pel of culture to the half-cultivated. He
has talked long and well to the Christian
Endeavorers of literature. He has earned
the right of addressing himself more di-
rectly to the saints. No American writ-
er of our day has done more "good,"
in the simple sense of that word ; but he
has been gradually educating the more
thoughtful portion of his large audience
away from those mellifluous common-
places in which beseems to think that
the greatest good for the greatest number
is still to be found. Many excellent mis-
sionaries have, through long and fluent
preaching in a foreign tongue, forgotten
how to use English. Danger lurks in Mr.
Mabie's hierophantic manner of chanting
the eternal truths of literature. Those
rich cadences may please the ear without
leaving any trace upon the memory. His
is not, in its characteristic features, a style
that " bites," but rather one of smooth-
ly woven periods, produced by words
thrown deftly back and forth upon a well-
oiled shuttle, reversing automatically at
every " but " or "yet," and then, as the
arithmetics used to say, " proceeding as
before."
Our quarrel, it will be perceived, is
not with one of the most genial and gifted
of our writers, but with that missionary
1 A New Discovery of a Vast Country in
America. By Father Louis HENNEPIN. Ed-
spirit which keeps him so frequently in
Macedonia when he ought to be preach-
ing to the Athenians on Mars' hill. No
man reasons more persuasively concern-
ing righteousness and temperance in let-
ters, yet he might, we think, say more
than he does about the judgment sure
to come upon faulty theory and slovenly
practice. Mr. Mabie uses every word in
a critic's vocabulary except that one in-
dispensable word " damn." His public
does not like this expression, and all pub-
lishers unite in thinking it very bad form.
Mr. Mabie courteously refrains from its
use. This is a pity, for we have few men
who care more sincerely for excellence,
and who might say with greater authority
to our generation : —
" Thou ailest here, and here ! "
If any proof of this were needed, it may
be found in the essay on America in
Whitman's Poetry in the present vol-
ume. Here is discriminating criticism,
expressed with vigor and precision. For
penetration, steady grasp of a complicated
matter, and luminous statement, it is the
best critique of Whitman thus far writ-
ten in England or America. B. P.
UNIFORM with their excellent reprint
Father Hen- °^ *ne Expedition of Lewis
nepln. an(j dark5 issued a year or
more ago, Messrs. A. C. McClurg &
Company have now published, under the
editorship of Reuben Gold Thwaites,
Father Hennepin's famous New Dis-
covery.1 The text is that of the second
London issue of 1698, and there are fac-
similes of original title-pages, maps, and
illustrations, together with a breezy in-
troduction by Mr. Thwaites, and a bib-
liography of Hennepin's works by Mr.
Victor Paltsits of the Lenox Library.
Father Hennepin was one of the most en-
tertaining liars who ever journeyed into
a far country. His account of Niagara,
of " the incomparable River Mescha-
ited by REUBEN GOLD THWAITES, Chicago :
A. C. McClurg & Co. 1903.
420
Books New and Old.
sipi," and of the savage tribes that in-
habited the vast Mississippi basin, loses
no whit of its interest as the learned
editor of the Jesuit Relations points out
the precise measure of his departure from
the truth. As if in anticipation of au
age of historical scholarship, note how
charmingly the mendicant friar defends
himself against his future annotators : —
"I am not insensible of the Reflec-
tions I shall meet with from such as
never dar'd to travel themselves, or
never read the Histories of the Curious
and Brave, who have given Relations of
the strange Countries they have taken
upon them to see ; I doubt not but that
sort of Cattle will account of this my Dis-
covery as being false and incredible.
But what they say shall not trouble me
much : They themselves were never Mas-
ters of the Courage and Valour which
inspires Men to undertake the glorious
Enterprizes that gain 'em Reputation in
the World, being confin'd within narrow
Bounds, and wanting a Soul to atchieve
any thing that can procure 'em a dis-
tinguishing and advantageous Character
among Men. It were better therefore
for such to admire what they cannot com-
prehend, and rest satisfy'd in a wise and
profound Silence, than thus foolishly to
blame what they know nothing of."
No less delightful is his melancholy
summary of the causes of his failure to
propagate the gospel among the Indians
at Fort Frontenac : —
" They were attentive and diligent in
coming to their Prayers, tho they had
none of that openness of Spirit which
is necessary to enter into the Verities of
Religion. They came to seek Instruction
with a Spirit of Interest, to have our
Knives, Awls, and such like things."
Surely our contemporary apostles of the
New Education, which endeavors, alike
in the innocent tasks of the kindergar-
ten and in the Graduate Schools of Ap-
1 The Poet Gray as a Naturalist. With Se-
lections from his Notes on the Systema Naturae
of Linnaeus and Facsimiles of Some of his Draw-
plied Science, " to seek Instruction with
a Spirit of Interest," should give their
days and nights to a study of Henne-
pin. They will find no edition so good
as this. £, p^
"SULLENLY" was the adverb which
The Poet ^r' J°nnson chose to describe
Gray as a the temper in which Gray
Naturalist , , . . . , . '
passed his days in his Cam-
bridge chambers. For once the Levia-
than's judgment of men, usually so con-
vincing, was at fault. The case against
him has become clearer with time, and
the issue of The Poet Gray as a Natural-
ist 1 only serves to illustrate more vivid-
ly the perversity of phrase. Mason had
written at length of Gray's wholesome
concern with the out-of-door sciences,
and his prote^ Bonstetten had written
of his preoccupation with the Systema
Naturae : "After breakfast appear Shake-
speare and old Lineus [stc] struggling
together as two ghosts would do for a
damned soul. Sometimes the one gets
the better, sometimes the other." But
not until now has it been possible to
know the extent and/juality of the poet's
dealings with this same old " Lineus."
Gray's copy of the Systema, passing
through several hands, came at last to
Ruskin's, and after his death was given
by his heir to Charles Eliot Norton.
Now we have a selection from Gray's
notes therein and facsimiles of his* draw-
ings, edited by Mr. Norton with his fa-
miliar fine carefulness, and published in
a form of much distinction and beauty.
In the three volumes of the Systema,
Gray, it seems, caused to be inserted
1380 pages of interleaving, which he all
but quite covered with Latin notes in
his delicate, cursive script, and with easy
and spirited delineations of birds and
insects. Along with the laborious learn-
ing which we might expect, the notes
show a skill as a descriptive naturalist
ings. By CHARLES ELIOT NORTON. Boston :
Charles E. Goodspeed. 1903.
"True Poets"
421
which could only come from the nice
observation of the types of nature, sub
Jove. The relation of these studies to
the classic quality of Gray's poetic art, to
his poetic taciturnity, would be a choice
theme for the expatiation of a casual
critic who could keep his reader in ig-
norance of the awkward fact that they
were chiefly the occupation of Gray's last
years, when his brief poetic activity had
ceased. It is, however, certainly not out
of place to note how the firm hold of the
substantial forms of things which marks
these notes comports with the reality of
image, which for all his personifications
and allusiveness is the life of his poetry.
And it is, at least, amusing to trace spe-
cific parallelisms between his poetry and
his scientific annotation. To take a sin-
gle instance : does not this description of
Fells catus serve to illustrate the mood
of the elegist of Selima ? " Domesticus
parum docilis, subdolus, adulatorius ;
domino dorsum, latera, caput, affricare
amat. Junior mire lusibus deditus et
jocis ; adultus tranquillior ..." and
so to more technical items. Indeed, to a
careful critic nothing which makes clear-
er the mind of a poet is quite foreign to
the appreciation of his art ; and this little
book — so full of the reality of scholarship
— is a true piece of Gray's mind. F. G.
"TRUE POETS."
AT a time when the flattering proposals
of a publisher, who — for a suitable sum
in hand — " has faith in poetry," bring
before an inattentive public too many
meagre volumes of unripe and bewil-
dered verse, it is cheering to find four
books containing the artistic expression
of sincere imaginative moods. The
latest volumes of Mr. Carman and Mrs.
Watson, whatever we may think of the
worth of the thoughts informing them,
have that measure of virtue at least ; Mr.
Taylor's first book shares it, and has a
very marked poetic idiosyncrasy beside ;
while Mr. Woodberry's collected Poems
is almost unique among recent books of
verse in giving evidence of all three of
the aptitudes of the " true poet " in har-
monious accord, — temperament, skilled
mastery of the ancient resources of the
poetic art, and a poet's mind.1
1 Sappho. One Hundred Lyrics. By BLISS
CABMAN. With an Introduction by CHARLES
G. D. ROBERTS. Boston : L. C. Page & Co. 1904.
After Sunset. By ROSAMUND MARRIOTT-
WATSON. New York and London : John Lane.
1904.
Mr. Carman's attempted compellation
of the shade of Sappho in the rewriting
of her hundred lost odes is an instructive
experiment, colored by a very pleasing
poetic quality. Handicapped as it is
by Mr. Roberts's emotional Introduction
singularly lacking in " the high, imperi-
ous verbal economy " which it celebrates,
and notwithstanding the copious same-
ness of the work itself, it contains scarce-
ly a line which read by itself will not
trouble and delight the imagination with
a vague sense of
" Old, unhappy, far-off things,"
and quicken it with the poignancy of
" the first sob of the south wind
Sighing at the latch with spring."
Yet a haunting sense of poetic imperfec-
tion will stay with the reader. This is
particularly noticeable in the different
The Overture. By JOSEPH RUSSELL TAYLOR.
Boston and New York : Houghton, Mifflin &
Co. 1903.
Poems. By GEORGE EDWARD WOODBERRY.
New York : The Macmillan Co. 1903.
422
"True Poets."
lustre of the tags from Wordsworth and
from Mr. Carman which we have just
quoted. Mr. Carman's half-quantitative,
unrhymed versification, with its subtle
suggestion of Sapphic metre, is a technical
triumph, the atmosphere and mood suffer
no lapse, and the phrase is always suave
and limpid ; but its very suavity and
limpidity are allied to the source of its
defect. Sings Mr. Carman, —
And there as darkness gathers
In the rose-scented garden
The god who prospers music
Shall give me skill to play.
And thou shalt hear, all startled,
A flute blown in the twilight
With the soft pleading magic
The greenwood heard of old.
This sweetness of phrase and tune is
everywhere in the book, but it goes along
with a kind of facile profusion which is
never drawn together in a single great
line, compact, pregnant, and immortal
like the one of Wordsworth's we have
applied as a touchstone, and like all of
Sappho's. Furthermore, there is a letting
down of tone, a coolness of passion, that
estops the verse from dateless perfection.
For a time the magic of the flute (and
with all its useful tone-color and conno-
tation, the word occurs in nearly every
poem) makes us oblivious of the real
mood of what we are reading. Grad-
ually we are aware : it is not Love, not
Sapphic love, not even Theocritean love ;
it is I'amour.
Mrs. Watson's writing in verse has
the poetic effectiveness that inheres in
the simple and musical expression of
moods of real tenderness and regret.
Her pieces rarely convey the effect of
bookishness so common in the plaintive
music of fellow poets not for nothing
called minor. Her chief literary inspira-
tion is clearly from the German lyric
Muse ; but the likeness is one of affinity
rather than of imitation. This connec-
tion is most obvious in her naming of
poems, where such titles as Abschied,
"Einst O Wunder," or Zigeunerlied
aptly suggest the burden of her song.
Her gift of intimating a lyric mood in
the German fashion, with the sparing
use of " poetic " imagery and diction, as
well as her tone of casual, unrevising
spontaneity will appear from these fine
memorial verses : —
The wind blows sweet through the valley,
A strong wind, pleasant and free ;
It blows with a rumour of travel
To the moorland up from the sea.
The miles and the desolate distance,
It shatters them all at will,
While we- wait here for a message
From a voice forever still.
O wind from the great new countries,
What know you of pain or loss ?
We are weeping for him in England
Who died 'neath the Southern Cross.
Herrick in Ohio would have been an
apt sub-title for the little book of an un-
commonly attractive individuality which
Mr. Taylor has happily called The Over-
ture. Mr. Taylor has little of the lim-
pidity of Mr. Carman, and less of the
simplicity of Mrs. Watson. His work
is exuberant with imagery and sound
drawn from American woods and fields,
conveyed in a prodigious number of
lyric words drawn from the vast stor,e-
house of the poets. But this opulence
is more promising than penury ; it is so
often controlled by an imaginative heat,
and so invariably modulated in unusual
and effective rhythms, that it augurs still
better work to be done. There is no
other poet now writing who adventures
irregular swallow flights of dactyls and
anapaests so successfully as Mr. Taylor ;
witness these enraptured lines : —
Hark, how the bobolinks ripple and bubble !
Out of the orchard what rapture of robins !
And look, the brown thrush up and facing the
storm
With a shaken, jubilant splendor and storm of
song,
And more than the heart can bear !
We like Mr. Taylor better in his deal-
ings with bird songs and the Ohio
countryside than we always do in his
"True Poets"
423
celebrations of more social sentiments.
He is rather too much disposed toward
undue detail and unction in his enumer-
ation of a girl's charms, too prone to
dally over some one of them, like the
ankle, not particularly expressive of
character. Some of the Elizabethans
and Herrick contrived to produce fine
poetry in spite of a similar predilection.
But nowadays it is haply a dangerous
thing to attempt to poetize the passion
of love unidealized either by the mood
of romantic devotion, or by that fore-
boding of motherhood which has en-
nobled most English poetry in this kind.
Mr. Taylor has the advantage that his
dalliance is out of doors, and the keen
air and sunlight which fill his lines keep
the sentiment just above I'amour. As is
often the case with young poets, whose
store of allusion and observation is an
embarrassment, Mr. Taylor is seen at his
best in set verse forms. This sonnet
might to advantage have known more of
file and hammer, but nevertheless it re-
presents the quality of his best achieve-
ment, and conveys his characteristic mood
and poetic creed : —
Not only through old legend's royal guise,
Nor in the quest that sought the fleece, the grail,
The sudden god looks forth to turn men pale
With wonder looking out of beauty's eyes.
At times a light of great enchantment lies
On my plain fields ; in woods as through a veil
Gleams the unknown romance ; and the lost tale
Informs familiar rivers with surprise.
Once, when upon the utmost hills the sun
An hour unmoving hung, and, all song dead,
Grew lovelier, sterner, deepening into red,
Harrow of stars, shaping the arrow blade
I saw the wild geese go. Summer was done.
The winged longing left me half afraid.
Writing in the Atlantic fourteen years
ago Mr. Thomas Bailey Aldrich, then
editor of the magazine, said at the close
of an extended review of Mr. Wood-
berry's first volume of verse : " The re-
viewer whose diversions in this sort are
not many counts it a fortunate month,
indeed a fortunate year when he can say,
' Here is a new poet,' and commend a
volume which makes so rich promise as
the North Shore Watch." But two cli-
macterics of Mr. Woodberry's life have
passed since then ; " a life," as he says,
in his preface, " never so fortunate as to
permit more than momentary and inci-
dental cultivation of that art which is the
chief grace of the intellectual life ; " yet
the promise has been made good. The
collected edition will be welcomed by
many readers to whom the North Shore
Watch and Wild Eden are not so much
books of admirable verse to be respect-
fully neglected, as a constant and inti-
mate possession. Though it is too fine
and sincere a product ever to be the idol
of a cult, there are qualities in Mr.
Woodberry's poetry which make it, in
a certain loose sense, esoteric. For all
its human wistfulness it is not quite po-
etry for the man in the street, nor is it
poetry for the lean and slippered panta-
loon ; it is peculiarly the poetry of young
men, of young men of generous mind, no
strangers to the old paths of the Muses
and soaring philosophies, yet quick with
the sense of present beauty, and earnest
with the thought of present obligation.
It will, perhaps, not be amiss to take oc-
casion of the appearance of this collected
edition to consider the quality and signi-
ficance of Mr. Woodberry's work.
It is impossible to open the volume
anywhere, at random, without at once
observing as its prime characteristics a
purity of line, a sweetness of melody, a
fineness of sentiment, not to be found
present in such perfect and unbroken
harmony in the work of any other among
contemporary poets. These lines from
the little Platonic drama of Agathon are
not a purple patch ; they represent the
color and texture of the woof of the
poem : —
Love comes in youth, and in the wakeful heart
Delight begins, soft as Aurora's breath
Fretting the silver waves, and dimly sweet
As stir of birds in branches of the dawn,
So soft, so sweet, thy touches round my heart.
O, fable, fable on !
424
'•'•True Poets"
Here, in little, are many of the qualities
of Mr. Woodberry's work ; its musical
sweetness, its fineness, its concern with
maidenhood, and maiden youth. But to
see these traits in their intensity we shall
have to turn to some of the lyrics, where-
in a true lyrical mood is poetized, with
firm lyrical structure, and with the cano-
rous quality that invites to reading aloud.
Take, for example, these stanzas : —
O, strange to me and wondrous,
The storm passed by,
With sound of voices thundrous
Swept from the sky ;
But stranger, love, thy fashion, —
0, tell me why
Art thou, dark storm of passion,
So slow to die ?
As roll the billowy ridges
When the great gale has blown o'er ;
As the long winter dirges
From frozen branches pour ;
As the whole sea's harsh December
Pounds on the pine-hung shore ;
So will love's deep remember,
So will deep love deplore.
In the deepening music of the vowels,
in subtle and haunting repetends, in per-
fect fusion of syntax in cadence, as well
as in the imaginative Tightness of the
underlying similitude, this is as perfect
in its way as — why should we hesitate
— the songs of Tennyson.
There are in these lines qualities, other
than those of formal perfection, which
will lead us inward. The view of na-
ture in them is of a piece with that found
in every poem. There is almost no piece
without its setting of landscape, — Italy,
the Cy clop's shore, the sea, the prairie ;
— but most often it is the keen, sweet
New England countryside and seashore.
This is the real natural background of
Mr. Woodberry's mind, and it is so
sharply realized that all of his work has
a peculiarly racy and indigenous tang.
In that noble elegy the North Shore
Watch, for all its freightage of idealistic
monism, the mood of the old lament for
Bion is as perfectly reproduced amid the
" brine and bloom " of the Beverly shore
as it was by Milton on the banks of Cam,
or by Arnold on Thamesside. But here,
as everywhere else in the volume, there
is one striking fact to be noted which
will help us to apprehend the quality of
the poetry still more intimately. The nat-
ural background is uncommonly real and
vivid, but we do not enter upon it by the
aid of many details of observation, as in
the case of Mr. Taylor's verse, or through
very much concrete imagery. Mr. Wood-
berry's affair is not so much with the
types of Nature, as with her moods and
symbolical processes, with the turn of
tides and seasons, and with the temper-
ament of the weather. It is Nature
recollected in tranquillity — and Plato-
nized.
Here we have foreshadowed the trait
of Mr. Woodberry's poetry that gives it
its power with youth, and justifies our
attribution to him of the poet's mind.
His work has the tonical coherence that
springs from a single view of the world,
clearly conceived, and firmly and con-
sistently maintained. It is easy for the
whimsicalist who has never found — or
has lost — himself to smile at " ideal-
ism ; " it is easy for the Lockist to con-
fute it ; yet it is the indispensable stuff
of poetry which is life. Mr. Woodberry
is a Puritan by inheritance, a Platonist
by temperament, and a cosmopolitan stu-
dent of letters by training. Out of these
strands he has woven and presented else-
where in prose an idealistic programme
which is pretty much that of Sidney
and Shelley ripened for the times. Held
by an immature mind of any age, such
a faith is often far from convincing, but
when it is put forth with mature enthu-
siasm, and informed with the results of
sound histoi-ical and literary scholarship,
it gains an evidential import that will
not be gainsaid. This is the vital prin-
ciple in Mr. Woodberry's poetry, and it
will appear more clearly from almost
any stanza of the poetry itself than from
many paragraphs of expository tedious-
ness. These stanzas, torn from an ode
The Contributors' Club.
425
remarkable for its sustained flight in a
perilous course, will serve for illustra-
tion. We quote from Wild Eden (1899),
which here, as in several other cases,
presents a better text, to our mind, than
that of the collected edition : —
I shall go singing over-seas :
" The million years of the planet's increase,
All pangs of death, all cries of birth,
Are clasped at one by the heart of earth."
I shall go singing by tower and town :
" The thousand cities of men that crown
Empire slow-rising from horde and clan
Are clasped at one by the heart of man."
I shall go singing by flower and brier :
" The multitudinous stars of fire,
And man made infinite under the sod
Are clasped at one by the heart of God."
It is clear that poetry so intellectual
as this, so constantly — even in occa-
sional pieces — guided by the spiritual
sense of life, is not calculated to win to
the outer circles of popularity. There
will, moreover, be those who will call it
" academic." This is a true character-
ization, but if it be used in dispraise it in-
volves a misconception. Mr. Woodberry
is an academic poet in precisely the sense
that Virgil and Catullus, Milton and
Tennyson were academic poets ; not in
the sense that Addison and Leo XIII
were so. He has the sieve for noble
words. Everywhere in the volume are
images, turns of thought, cadences, sym-
bols, that send the lettered mind flash-
ing away to Shelley, or Gray, or Tasso,
or Theocritus ; yet no piece is merely
bookish. The mood is always real and
deeply felt, and if for the expression of
it the author has drawn deeply from the
old stores of the Muses, it is but the
rightful privilege of the ultimus cala-
mus, the last pen, which, so it make them
its own by eminent domain, may use at
will all the riches of its predecessors.
It may well be that here and there is a
turn of this sort that is " bookish " in the
sense that it fails quite to carry to a reader
not acquainted with the classics of our
own and other tongues. In the main,
however, Mr. Woodberry's volume is a
vindication of the scholarly mode of
poetry. His envisagement of life is the
richer for his scholarship, his expression
more suave and eloquent. And if there
be a loss in extensiveness of appeal, there
is a compensating gain in the intensity of
delight for qualified readers. F. G.
THE CONTRIBUTORS' CLUB.
WHEN I declare my preference for
Typewriter tine Pen over the typewriter,
vs. Pen. tbe hustling business man of
to-day will class me among the cranks
who would abolish the railway in favor
of the stagecoach. But I am no bigoted
devotee of ancient ways. I have myself
used the typewriter for thirteen years,
and would not hesitate to give it a testi-
monial for services rendered. I can un-
derstand, too, that to the merchant or
lawyer, with his immense correspon-
dence, it has become a necessary labor-
saving device. I do not dispute its use-
fulness as a commercial instrument ; it is
as a literary instrument that I believe its
value to be commonly over-rated.
Let it be granted that in many cases
the machine promotes legibility. There
are persons of so vexatious a handwrit-
ing that the Golden Rule would prohibit
them from putting their thoughts on pa-
per without its assistance. Yet, in spite
of the neglect of penmanship in modern
schools, these are exceptions. The next
advantage is speed. No doubt this counts
for much in an office, or in the reporters'
room of a daily paper, but where it is a
426
The Contributors' Club.
question of thoughtful composition, and
not of the mere transcribing of shorthand
notes, the supposed profit is illusory. You
do not need a literary automobile for
ideas that can scarcely keep up with a
pedestrian pace. I have serious doubts
about the ingenious conceptions that have
been lost to the world because the author's
pen lagged behind his imagination.
Now for my grievances against this
vaunted substitute for the old-fashioned
pen. First, there is its weight, which
restricts its use to the table or desk at
home. Next, there is the fact that, be-
ing a machine, it is subject to all the ills
that machinery is heir to. All makes
of typewriter except one — see adver-
tisements and circulars passim — have
a tendency to get out of order, and the
law of chances makes it unlikely that any
individual among us will capture that elu-
sive perfect creation. Now, as a rule, the
professional author is not of a mechani-
cal bent : neither natural aptitude nor
training has given him the knack of deal-
ing authoritatively with levers and pawls.
And the derangements are sure to come
at the most irritating moments, with dis-
astrous effects upon the writer's moods.
There was no unhealthiness of tone about
Oliver Wendell Holmes, yet he was care-
ful to avoid all possible friction that
might interrupt the act of composi-
tion. Many a fine thought, he said, had
perished ere it was fairly born, being
strangled in the birth by a hair on the
nib of the pen or choked out of life by
muddy ink. How much more apprehen-
sive would he have been of the intellec-
tual parts of an erratic type-bar or a
refractory ribbon ! Then, the physical
labor involved in the working of any
make of machine must consume much
more energy than the formation of let-
ters by the pen. Possibly the average
literary man would be better if he took
more exercise, but indoor athletics of this
sedentary type scarcely supply the lack.
Further, although one may not be acutely
conscious of the noise of the operation,
the constant rattle cannot hut add to tt
strain, and produce a certain nervoi
wear and tear.
A novice at typewriting commonlj
fears that the demand of the machir
upon the attention must make origins
composition upon it impossible. Acti
ally there is no difficulty here, for aft
a little practice he thinks as little aboi
his keys as the bicyclist about his ba
ance. The real drawback does not
in any sense of the unnaturalness of the
medium, but in the awkwardness of mat
ing corrections while writing. It is
clumsy task to alter a word, or chang
the order of clauses, or make interlines
tions while the paper is on the cylinder
so we decide to wait until the sheet come
off the machine. By the time we ha^
reached the bottom of the page
projected amendment has slipped 01
memory. To some kinds of writing
forfeiture of this opportunity means
serious loss. Literary quality is stil
further impaired by a temptation
which the typewriter exposes those
thors for whose work there is a grea
demand. In the facilities it supplies f c
the copying of dictated matter in a shor
time, and at a cheap rate, some profe
sional writers have discerned an expedi-
ent for increasing their output. This
inevitably means the production of poorer
stuff. Mr. Herbert Spencer confessed
not long ago that in re-reading his own
books he found those which had been
dictated inferior in style to the others.
When a writer attempts to compose at
shorthand speed he turns himself into
an extempore speaker ; he is insensibly
drawn to cultivate the style of the man
on the platform, and his article has the
diffuseness of an harangue. It might
be impressive with an audience, but it
wearies the reader.
But suppose that the book or article is
completed without the aid of either ste-
nographer or machine, is it not desirable
that the manuscript should then be trans-
lated into the clearer letterpress of the
The Contributors' Club.
427
typewriter before coming into the print-
er's hands ? Only in one case, — namely,
when the author performs this translation
himself. If his own handwriting is hard
to read, better let him send his autograph
sheets to the printer in all their tangle and
uncouthness than have them ''straight-
ened out " in a typewriting office. The
average compositor, in a good house, is
far more competent than the average
girl typist to decipher difficult manu-
script, and when his sagacity fails he has
expert assistance close at hand to appeal
to. The typist will misread a word and
substitute another, which, though it goes
a long way toward spoiling the sentence,
does not make nonsense of it. The au-
thor, glancing hurriedly through the type-
written sheets and not comparing them
minutely with the fii'st draft, does not
notice the difference, and the printer, of
course, follows the copy that is set before
him. If the autograph original had gone
straight to the compositor's case the mis-
take would not have been made. I could
give instances within my own knowledge,
illustrating the corruption of a text by
the process just described. As I said at
the outset, I am no unreasoning foe to
the typewriter, for it has been a helper
and friend to the journalist and author
as well as to the man of business ; but
at a time when there are so many other
causes of slovenliness in the production
of printed matter it will be a great pity
if its indiscriminate use leads to a degen-
eration in literary style, or to a lowering
of the standard of high-class printing.
I BEGAN" to read the Contribution called
Unhand- "Handsomely Illustrated," in
somely
Illustrated, a recent Club, with all the
pleasant anticipation of the small boy
who sees his contemporary about to come
in for an application of the maternal
slipper. (Let me correct myself and say
paternal, for the Contributor has done
his utmost for the credit of the Club by
betraying his sex.) I read with interest
and sympathy, but finished disappointed.
Was it possible that he had failed to
bring the slipper down on the right spot,
— which meant, of course, the one I was
thinking of ? Should that bad boy still
go unpunished for that particular sin ?
Discipline forbid ! Not if I have to give
him what he deserves myself !
" He [the illustrator] derives his idea
from the text just as the reader derives
his," remarks the Contributor. But
there are times when we are forced sadly
to doubt the truth of this statement, in
fact, to wonder whether the illustrator
derives his idea from the text at all.
'' Sophronia sat in the twilight ponder-
ing," Sophronia being represented in the
story as a gentle, quiet New England
maid. Illustration, a thick-lipped, fierce-
eyed, disheveled, tropical sort of creature
whom one suspects of mixed descent.
Or Alicia's straitened circumstances and
narrow village life are happily indicated
by a modish, low-cut, evening frock. Two
generations ago we could forgive a Becky
Sharp who was apparently a decrepit Ital-
ian hag. And in 1840, when the burning of
the Steamer Lexington was pictured, we
were much edified toseeall the gentlemen,
escaping on mattresses or floating in the
water, prudently attired in high hats.
We should not, I think, have caviled if
we had seen them courteously removing
those stately coverings in deference to
the ladies whom they were helping to
places of refuge. But times have changed
since then, and our demands have
changed with them. It appears, how-
ever, that methods have not changed so
much as we are sometimes led to fancy.
With all the boasted advance in illustra-
tion, Sophronia's West Indian counte-
nance and Alicia's low-necked dress seem
to my humble perception to belong to the
same stage of development as the early
Becky and the " toppers " of the Lexing-
ton's passengers.
Another weakness we should surely
have outgrown. " Isabel watched Rob-
ert's changing expression," remarks an
author in a late magazine. But in the
illustration, Isabel's attention is deter-
428
The Contributors' Club.
minedly fixed upon a spot on the wall,
about on a level with Robert's waist.
Again I am sent back to the past, this
time to those large wall-engravings that
within not so very long a memory no gen-
tleman's parlor was without. " The Mar-
riage of Pocahontas " was especially ad-
mirable for the ingenuity of the artist in
providing separate points of attention for
all the numerous wedding guests, and still
avoiding the necessity of having a single
one glance in the direction of the pair just
making their vows to Heaven. " The
Declaration of Independence " presents
the same effect with no less success, the
august Signers showing an entire lack of
interest in the great document before
them, and bending their minds, to judge
from their evident uneasy self-conscious-
ness and rapt gaze at vacancy, on hav-
ing their pictures taken. The illustrator
who gave us Isabel cannot rival these
examples in point of elaborate composi-
tion, but so far as his subject permits he
has followed their tradition faithfully.
I quite agree with the Contributor.
Illustrations should illustrate. Is it too
much to ask that they also make a nearer
approach to that realism which we are
so often assured is the most striking char-
acteristic of our time ?
IT is a matter of self-gratulation with
Europe Un- me that ^ am at one and the
visited. same time an American, and
not a millionaire. Because of the first
I may go to Europe ; because of the sec-
ond, I have n't been there already.
But I find two fears menacing my air-
ship fancies. Do I know enough to go
to Europe ? When Tarn ready to see Eu-
rope, will there be a Europe there to
see ? For I am densely, deeply ignorant.
That is all very well in America, where
I am only one among a nation of bluffers ;
but would not Europe see through me,
find me out, refuse to shake hands ? I
fear that the Grandmother Past would not
take me on her lap and tell me stories if
I could n't recite my English sovereigns,
if I proved hazy on architecture, and im-
perfect in geography. Would the des
come forth debonair out of their crypt
to welcome me, if I could furnish nc
dates by way of credentials ? I knowint
no Italian, would the gondoliers sing int
my heart all the gayety of Venice ?
French being rusted, would Paris p
with me the merry time of day ? l
afraid Europe will say to me, Out of mj
palaces, away from my pictures, don't
lay finger on my cathedrals, — no ignor
mus wanted here ! — But I have no time
to study all these matters, nor patiem
either. Nor am I minded to do Euroj
by Baedeker ; I am right gypsy with the
lust for strange faces and beckoning by-
ways, and with no nose whatsoever
be buried in a guidebook. I mentione
these my doubts and fears to a fellov
worker, who had scraped and saved anc
bought herself a summer, and returne
as one likes to see travelers return -
shabby - coated, shining - eyed, speaking
little, with do-it-again-as-soon-as-possibl
writ large over all her plans and pui
poses. She answered promptly, " It
much better to study about it after yoi
have seen it than before." Perhaps it is ;
I will leave it that way, I think. Euroj
must take me just as I am ; if it does n't
so much the worse for Europe.
Yet when I take stock of my kno\
ledge of that various other side, what
small parcel it is, and how shakily dor
up ! London, for instance. In Londor
there are the Tower, and Westminster
and the Temple, and lodgings, — street
and streets of lodgings. In the Towe
are beef -eaters, — a sort of mediaen
policemen carrying halberds ; and
jewels in glass cases, — I never did ca
much for things in glass cases ; and the
there are bloodstains ; but I am afraic
to appreciate bloodstains ; I should ha\
gone abroad younger. Westminster is
great dim place where you may stay
day, like a Mr. Addison or a Mr. Hare
ing, or poking about the Poets' Corner
feeling the ashes of the great mouldering
genially all about you, — only it would
The Contributors' Club.
429
be just my luck to be thrilled by a ceno-
taph.
The Temple is a name of magic. I 've
no notion of its appearance. There is
an Inner Temple, — that implies, I sup-
pose, a building like an American apart-
ment house built around a court. But it
is the Temple, the Inner Temple that I
want to see in London, because he lived
there, had chambers there, held his
Wednesday evenings there, — the sad-
dest, merriest soul that ever chuckled in
print.
Those London lodgings, — I should
have to live in lodgings in London, poor
lodgings, because they are cheap and I
am cheap, — frowzy lodgings, savored
with frying, garnished at intervals with
a slatternly landlady and a little slavey.
In lodgings they furnish candles and
toast and tea, a diet which would have to
be washed down with plentiful draughts
from that cask I carry with me, that wine
called Traveler's Delight.
My Continental itinerary is delight-
fully vague ; my imagination supplies a
map of the everywhere, marked with
bright red crosses where are the Alps,
Paris, Rome, Venice. My general im-
pression of the Continent is that, as a
whole, it suffers from a lack of the great
American bathtub, and does not supply
ice water. Dirty and thirsty and happy-
hearted shall I make my pilgrimage.
Paris first, where you can sit — sit on
what ? — and see all the world drive by,
see all the world out pleasuring ; Paris,
that performs all manner of naughtiness
so prettily that nobody cares, because it 's
Paris, — should I dare to sip the tiniest
sip of absinthe myself ? Paris, — where
I should be cheated of my hard-wrung
dollars with shrugs so picturesque and
smiles so ready that I would gladly pay
the price. But I have heard that in
Paris strange men speak to young girls
on the street. I am not a young girl, but
a man might speak to me, and being an
American, I should n't like it.
Posting southward, I shall find my
Italy, with its sunshine, its brown, care-
free beggars, its old gardens, its old pal-
aces, its old statues, all its grace of beauti-
ful decay. I want to see Rome, Horace's
Rome, Hawthorne's Rome, Crawford's
Rome ; I want to see the Pope, and St.
Peter's, and the Faun, and Miriam. And
I want to see the catacombs. How do
you get to them ? I picture myself run-
ning about the streets hunting diligently
for a stairway down, just as I hunt for
the basement in a department store.
How damp and shivery and fearsome
and Poe-ish ! Let no man cheat me of
my catacombs.
Venice is the next red spot on my map,
Venice by day and Venice by night, with
the music over the water, the rhythmic
dip of oars, the lights of palace windows,
and the gliding through moonlight into
shadow. But my American soul rises
up in query, as thus, — if Venice were in
America, what a clatter it would make
in the press with its typhoid and its ma-
laria ! what in the world does Venice do
about microbes and mosquitoes ? This is
irreverence. Let me here admonish my-
self betimes, — look 'ee, miss, when you
go to Europe, do not carry the skeleton
of a microbe with you to spoil the feast.
But even as I dream of my red crosses,
and the brave unknown roads that lead
to them, that other fear of mine comes
knocking, knocking, — will Europe wait
for me ? Even now it shows signs of
impatience at my delay, says, " Hurry
up ! " and knocks down a Campanile in
dudgeon. It is causing its cathedrals to
crumble, it is girdling its Alps with trol-
ley lines, it is undressing its peasants to
trick them out in ugly clothes like ours,
it is even muttering threats of household
sanitation. If it would only wait a little
while !
Such titles as " Vanishing London "
alarm me. I had not supposed that Lon-
don would be vulgar enough to vanish.
I thought they did things better over
there ; Henry James gave me so to un-
derstand. I should have thought John
430
The Contributors' Club.
Bull would thrust forward his jaw as
who should say, " Pooh, pooh. Don't
talk to me about vanishing ! "
Not long since there appeared a series
of articles showing forth the commercial
conquest of Europe by America. I did
not read the articles ; the illustrations
made me sufficiently sick at heart. They
represented glaring American dollar
signs hung out all over the landscape
from Labrador to the boot-toe of Italy,
from Portugal to Siberia ! Matter of
apprehension, indeed, to the wanderer
held at home !
You travelers who are setting out
ahead of me, who are even now shoulder-
ing scrip and taking up staff for the pil-
grimage, carry my message over the seas,
— tell Europe to wait for me, pray Europe
to sit down hard and hold on to itself
with both hands to keep from vanishing,
for I am surely coming, — I, the great
American wage-earner — tramp, tramp !
— I am coming !
A PHASE of the rural life of New Eng-
NewEng- land, often touched upon by
landVi- ' At
sionaiies. local writers, surely needs fur-
ther elucidation. No attempt to define
the cause or even the nature of a well-
known feature of this part of our country
seems adequate. There are not many
villages or settlements in New England
where there is not at least one person
afflicted — if you choose to use that
word — with a sort of mild monomania,
an unshaken belief in something which
does not exist, either a remembering of
what has never happened, or a hoping
for what cannot come. One can hardly
call this insanity, madness, for upon all
other points the mind is clear and
healthy. Some have styled these hallu-
cinations dreams. But we wake from
dreams, and I have never known a case
of the kind referred to cured, or one of
these illusions or delusions dispelled. I
would not bring such a trite subject to
these pages had I not met lately with
two or three illustrations which seem to
me somewhat significant.
For several years I have met at inter-
vals in one of our northern hill villages
a pleasant little countrywoman. He
neat, white cottage and gay little garde
are well known to many summer boa
ers. She is a tiny creature, with twir
kling black eyes and intelligent face, ai
I have always enjoyed my chats wit
her about her posies, her dog and cat, ar
her neighbors. For years I never sav
in her the faintest sign of an unbalance
mind, nor did any of the country fol
about seem to regard her as anything
but sane and sensible. But one day when
she came to bring me a bunch of " posy-
peas " — a name given to distinguish the
decorative sweet peas of the borders from
the homelier blossoms of the kitchen gar-
den — she told me a story. I knew that
she had lost two children under painful
circumstances many years before, but
had forgotten that she had a son still
living. Some word of mine showed that
I thought her childless, and she ex-
claimed, " Why, don't you know I 've got
a boy livin' way out West ? " Her
whole face shone as she went on speak-
ing of that boy. In her story he was
the best, the most devoted of sons, steady,
industrious, prosperous, and, moreover,
very religious. He was married, and
had two children, little girls. These she
had never seen, but they loved her dearly,
and always sent her messages of affec-
tion in their father's weekly letters. " I
wish I 'd got their picturs here," she said
wistfully. " I 'd 'a' fetched 'em along if
I 'd thought ; so pretty and cunnin' they
be in their little white frocks, with their
hair all slicked and curled. John says
in his last letter — Here, I '11 read it to
you." She put her hand to the bosom
of her dress as if to draw forth the
cherished paper, but withdrew it, saying,
" No, I left it to home. But I can say
it off every word." And she repeated
slowly, as if from memory, " ' Mary Ann
and 'Lizy ' — that one 's named for me
— ' send their love to dear grandma.
They keep a-talkin' about you, and every
The Contributors' Club.
431
single night when they say their prayers
they put in " God bless grandma and take
care of her." ' The old woman's voice
broke, and the tears rolled down her face
as she quoted this. She gave me many
homely details, till I seemed to know all
about this loving son and his filial piety.
It was a pathetic tale, but as she used
the broadest dialect of the region, and in-
troduced many odd idioms of her own, I
often " smiled as well as sighed." When
she spoke earnestly of her daughter-in-
law, "John's wife, Libby Jane, the best
woman that ever breathed the breath o'
life," I was touched, and thought of
Jean Ingelow's lines, —
" A sweeter woman ne'er drew breath
Than my son's wife, Elizabeth."
But when she added that Libby Jane was
a real Christian though she did weigh
nigh on to two hunderd pounds, I smiled
inwardly.
She went away, promising to bring the
pictures and letters soon.
Now for my sequel : The poor wo-
man's story was true only in one par-
ticular, — she had a son living. But he
was a scamp. He left her years before,
and had never sent her a word since he
went away. She heard of him from
time to time, of his ill repute as a drunk-
en, worthless vagabond. He had mar-
ried, but had abandoned his wife after a
few months. These were the hard foun-
dation facts upon which was reared the
airy, beautiful castle shown me that day.
Now, nobody can make me believe
that this little woman was deliberately
lying. That she thoroughly believed, at
the time, all she told me, I cannot doubt.
You would not doubt had you seen and
heard her. The neighbors whom I ques-
tioned all gave her credit for being hon-
est and truthful, and all pronounced her
sane. " But," as one of them said in
explanation, " she 's had a sight of trou-
ble, and no child to be a mite of com-
fort, so she 's just got to believing this
about her son being good and all that,
and we never let on it is n't so." Well,
I hope no sincere but mistaken stickler
for truth will ever let on to the poor
woman that it is n't so. I have met her
again and again since that time, but she
has rarely spoken of her son. Once she
met me, with a beaming face, saying, as
soon as she was within hearing, " I got
a letter from John last night, and I 'm
goin' to fetch it over." She never fetched
it. Now, where and how did her story,
with its many little details of her son's
devotion and that of his family, come to
the simple soul ? She could not have
manufactured all at any one time. It
must have been the growth of years, all
that the poor creature had heard or seen
of filial affection being woven into it, bit
by bit. It seems to me it must have be-
gun with a yearning desire which at last
became to her the firm substance of the
" things hoped for."
I was driving in northern New Eng-
land a few years ago, and stopped for
the night at a small inn. When I went
to my room I was at once struck by the
odd look of a piece of furniture there.
It was a low, benchlike table or table-
like bench, not a foot-stove, nor a shelf,
but a little like either or both. Its deco-
ration was the most striking thing about
it. This was in gaudy color, — a wild,
flying, sprawling, bold, free creation.
Was it a dragon or an archangel ? Was
it meant for a winged victory or the
spirit of plague, pestilence, and famine ?
I cannot describe it ; I never saw any-
thing so weird as this — Thing — as it
tossed its limbs or wings or tentacles
about and flung them across that wooden
background. I found myself saying over
to myself some lines from an old hymn
my father used to sing : —
" And on the wings of mighty winds
Came flying all abroad."
When the landlady's little daughter
came into the room I asked her what the
strange object was. She answered glibly,
but I could not understand her. The
reply seemed one long, unintelligible
432
The Contributors' Club.
word. I repeated my inquiry. This
embarrassed the bashful child, and rat-
tling off the name again she fled from
the room. But this time I made out
the syllables of the strange utterance,
" crazy-man's- vision." And she spoke
the strange name as if it was the well-
known designation of any ordinary bit
of household furnishing, as one should
say, a low-boy, or a settle, or a secre-
tary.
As I passed through the hall on my
way downstairs I glanced into two or
three bedrooms, and in each I saw an
exact counterpart of the article in my
own room. Later I found one in the
parlor and another in the dining-room.
Then I questioned the landlady, an in-
telligent, sensible woman, and this is
what she told me : —
These objects were all made by a resi-
dent of the village, a man of some means,
not obliged to work for a living. For
years his one occupation had been the
making and decorating these strange,
useless things. They were all exactly
alike, having upon each the same mar-
velous, spreading, flying — as my in-
formant described it, " sprangling " —
creature. And it was his own name for
these which the little girl had given me,
crazy-man's-vision. He never sold one,
but gave them all to friends and neigh-
bors. " He don't need money," the good
woman said, "being about the well-to-
doest man about here." And she add-
ed, " There is n't a house in the village,
I guess, that has n't got at least one of
these crazy - man's - visions." The man
himself was said to be sensible and bright,
esteemed by his neighbors, and often con-
sulted by them in matters of business and
village affairs. He had never shown the
slightest sign of an unsound mind save
in this one matter. But my landlady
and one or two neighbors with whom I
talked all spoke of his strange absorption
in this occupation, and his intense ad-
miration of the completed work. " I 've
seen him sit and look at one of those
outlandish figures," said one old man,
" by the hour, and I 've heard him say
that folks did n't know how splendid that
picture was, but they would some day."
These two illustrations — drawn from
real life and not retouched or exagger-
ated in the slightest degree — seem to
have much in common.
The mother - love, disappointed and
objectless, seeking a resting - place so
earnestly that it seems already gained ;
the artistic, imaginative nature, untaught,
untrained, aspiring toward expression,
and finding this strange outlet and ut-
terance, — these are not dissimilar. But
I found no theory upon them. I leave
that to wiser heads.
THE
ATLANTIC MONTHLY:
iftaga?ine of Literature, Science, art, anD
VOL. XCIIL — APRIL, 1904. — No. DL VIII.
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE.
THE historian of the future, review-
ing an epoch preeminent in so many re-
spects, will find the nineteenth century
not, at least, far behind its predecessors
in the odd character of its cults. He
will be, moreover, surprised to learn that
one of the most bizarre of these, though
compelled by nature to make its way
without the assistance of logic, actually
grew — slowly but surely — until it had,
in a few years' time, attained a size to
be accounted for, if not an influence to be
reckoned with ; and that this eminently
illogical proceeding took place without
the appearance of anything that could
be called a serious answer to the chal-
lenges made, — even from the profes-
sion most directly attacked. For the
criticisms of Christian Science, though
numerous and in many cases just, have
been, I think, far from satisfactory. And
for this reason : that they have attacked
superficial defects without due regard
to underlying principles. Probably no
characteristic of the Christian Science
Bible, for example, is so obvious as its
inconsistencies ; certainly no book, mak-
ing any claim to scientific consideration,
so abounds in manifest contradictions.
And yet we have not disposed of the
question when we have pointed these
out. Mrs. Eddy offers us a theory of
knowledge and of evil ; and her incon-
sistencies in elaboration affect the truth
of neither the one nor the other. Jibes,
too, make a somewhat poor substitute
for logic, — if reasoned conviction be,
indeed, your aim ; for it is easy to ridi-
cule where you cannot cope, and a very
small genius may be a very large jester.
Nor does the charge of fanaticism do
away with all need of debate ; for Truth
has, in more than one instance, been
done high service by this enthusiasm run
riot. Jeopardizing accuracy in an epi-
gram, we may say that history hibernates
between honest fanatics. But for them,
indeed, the world's thankless chores would
fare but ill. Without under-estimating
the value of a conservative position in
both the theoretical and the practical con-
cerns of life, or for a moment suggesting
that any other position could, in the long
run, surpass it in the majestic front it
offers to fickleness of thought and ac-
tion, it is important to remember that
the people of one idea — the " dare-to-
do-right " men of the juvenile books —
have done, unattractive as their lack of
mental equilibrium may be, some big
things in the world. The really intel-
lectual men of an age are, for the most
part, conservative men ; and often they
are conservative to the extreme of pre-
judice. Anything iconoclastic risks be-
ing for them, ipso facto, beyond the pale
of legitimate belief. Yet we must not
forget how often in history the thought-
ful and conservative men of a century
have accepted and taught ideas which
the conservative and thoughtful men of
preceding years had dallied with only to
scoff at them. Any striking work must
expect striking opposition. Indeed, those
434
Christian Science.
who wish to be effective in the world
have, among the first and most discour-
aging obstacles they meet, the wooden
men who hover on the safe edge of every
conflict, their arms laden with wet blan-
kets, finding the delight of their life in
smothering enthusiasms. A long history
has taught us that to condemn as a fa-
natic may be to canonize, — provided,
always, the enthusiast qualify for saint-
hood by his absolute sincerity.
Nor, again, is it any sure sign of fal-
sity that Christian Science has been an
intellectual failure. Mrs. Eddy has, to
be sure, failed to make a strong brief
for a confessedly weak case. She has
elaborated a system which will be most
readily accepted by those who are usually
found at the other end of tangents. Yet
truth may live in spite, not because, of
its intellectual support. Indeed, many
of the thought-movements which subse-
quent history has stamped as genuine
advances of the truth have had at the
outset to contend with the culture and
refinement of their day, and to find their
champions in the crude, the unlettered,
sometimes even the coarse stratum of
society. Luther, with his monk's train-
ing and one deep conviction, gave a new
direction to history ; while Erasmus, the
aristocrat of scholars, refusing to soil his
mind with theological squabbles, busied
his more brilliant talents with the fine
subtleties of thought, leaving the dark
age to get its light as best it could. The
humility of intellect and the insolence of
intellect are phrases with a meaning in
history. An emphasis of the moral rea-
son and a relative neglect of the pure
reason are no sure signs of weakness ;
and the logician has sometimes to follow
the visionary.
In a word, then, it is the duty of the
critic of Christian Science to detect some
weakness in its basal principles. That
duty neglected, he has accomplished no-
thing final, though he attack its obvious
inconsistencies with never so logical an
accuracy, or its fanaticism with never so
keen a humor, or its intellectual weak-
ness with never so fine a scorn.
To gain -anything like a clear idea of
just what Mrs. Eddy intends the teacl
ing of Christian Science to be is a mos
difficult matter ; for it is never easy to
analyze into a systematic grouping of
principles, a maze of disconnected anc
contradictory statements. Mrs. Eddy's
book is absolutely inorganic, — wha
Lamb would call ySt/SAtW a/3i/3Aiov :
sequence of sentences characterized
chronic nou-sequaciousness. It kn
nothing of outline, and is innocent of df
velopment. Yet certain points are made
clear, even if not consistently adhered
to. To begin negatively, — and this is
an all-important point, because misun-
derstanding of the facts has resulted in
the popular misconception to the contra-
ry, — Christian Science is not funda-
mentally a system of therapeutics, any
more than it is fundamentally a system
of salvation. Sin and Sickness are, by
its dictum, in the same category ; and
the transference of emphasis from Evil
in general to Sickness in particular, is an
incident in the history, rather than at
essential in the theory, of Christian Sci-
ence. The transition from philosophy
therapeutics is, of course, simple enougt
if you start with a certain kind of pi
losophy. Here is Mrs. Eddy's logic:
Instances of the deceitful testimony of
the sense-organs are common ; therefor
we can never trust what they tell us of
the world without. But their testimony
of that world being that it is existent
and that testimony being always false
the external world does not exist. There
fore, matter in general does not exis
and the conditions of matter must
illusions. Disease is a condition of
ter, and is, therefore, an illusion ; anc
the cure for it is the removal of the ilk
sion. Therapeutics, evidently, is onl>
secondary ; and an attack in that direc
tion, to be effective, must be aimed bad
at the philosophy. For Christian
Christian Science.
435
ence therapeutics is the truth if Chris-
tian Science philosophy is the truth ;
indeed, if Mrs. Eddy's premises be cor-
rect, her conclusion is the only consistent
one. Fundamentally, Christian Science
is a philosophy of Evil based on a phi-
losophy of Knowledge, and its cure of
disease is only incidental, even though
identified in the popular mind with the
system itself.
The basal propositions upon which
Christian Science may be wrought into
a system, and at which any criticism of
that system must be directed, are its
teachings about God, Man, Knowledge,
Matter, Evil, and Christianity. Briefly,
they are these : —
1. God, the Ego, is All in All, the only
Life, Substance, and Soul, the only In-
telligence of the Universe. He is Mind
and fills all space.
2. Man is the true image of God ; he
has no consciousness of material life or
death ; his material body is a mortal be-
lief ; he was, is, and ever shall be per-
fect.
3. Knowledge. Knowledge gained
from the material senses is a tree whose
fruits are sin, sickness, and death. The
evidence of the senses is not to be ac-
cepted in the case of sickness any more
than it is in the case of sin. The physi-
cal senses are simply beliefs of mortal
mind.
4. Matter cannot be actual. God
being all, matter is nothing.
5. Evil, (a) Sin. Error is unreal.
All that God made is good ; hence there
is no evil, (b) Sickness. Health is not
a condition of matter. Human mind
produces organic disease as certainly as
it produces hysteria, (c) Death is an
illusion, (d) Cure. The cure for sin,
sickness, and death — since all are illu-
sions — is the destruction of the illusion.
6. Christianity is a demonstration
of divine principle casting out error and
healing the sick. Soul cannot sin nor
being be lost. Scripture must be inter-
preted spiritually.
n.
There are four great highways of evi-
dence which will lead, I think, — as all
roads met at Rome, — to the essential
unsoundness of Christian Science : though
each may bring us to a different aspect
of it. In the first place it defies the
canons of history ; and it may be shown,
in addition, to be specious philosophy,
superficial science, and a caricature on
Christianity.
Christian Science comes to us claiming
a revealed origin ; and the presumption
from the first is therefore against it
Men who have read history have learned
to suspect such claims. They know that
thousands like it have been made before ;
and they know, too, that few have stood
off oblivion long enough even to get
themselves discussed. They have come
to recognize certain characteristics as
proofs of speciousness ; they have learned
to demand as indispensable certain other
distinguishing qualities. Simplicity, with
a majestic mystery ; humility, with a
commanding dignity ; when these are
wanting — as they are most emphatically
wanting in Science and Health — men
with some knowledge of history have a
right to be suspicious ; and when shocked
Christian Science replies, " The Hand
that made me is Divine," the critic, with
his textbook of the Past open, answers,
" Your name is Legion." Claims to
divinity must stand history's tests ; when
they fail to do so, history can do no more
than stamp them specious. And it is
about as likely that the Great Unknown,
casting about for a medium for his sani-
tary pronouncement, should have singled
out this bungling prophetess, as that the
immortal spirits, dead and not yet born,
should find no more profitable occupa-
tion than strumming banjos for the de-
light of mediums too spiritually consti-
tuted to engage in honest work.
But Christian Science takes its second
fling at the canons of history in its atti-
tude toward the future and its limitless
436
Christian Science.
claims over it. For this naive philosophy
nothing is impossible. It is a catholicon
— absolute and unfailing. The myste-
ries of Life — the one mystery especially
which has absolutely baffled every think-
er who has attacked it (and that includes
humanity) — are to Mrs. Eddy ridicu-
lously plain. We are suspicious of om-
niscience, and we have a right to be. A
few aeons of disappointed hopes have
taught us to smile at that word " Pan-
acea."
More unhistorical still, however, is
the claim of Christian Science to be, not
a development, but a flash of light from
heaven. Truth hates haste, and history
knows no short cuts. Most iconoclastic
institutions have made their entrance into
the world gradually, in the face of re-
cognized difficulty ; and, if analogies from
nature be valid, it would seem that it is
always thus with progressive processes.
Indeed, so thoroughly have men come to
realize this fact that " evolution " is a
byword with the essayists ; and whether
the subject be " The Digestive Apparatus
of the Oyster," or " The Origin of Reli-
gion," they are never tired of telling us
that slow growth is the universal habit
of the truth. Only in rare instances has
any new truth been brought to light by a
flash ; the rule that history teaches is — a
slow stumbling in the dark until the light
is reached. The presumptive evidence,
as the great laws of life working them-
selves out in history have made it of value
to us, is against Christian Science. The
system fails to align itself with the past.
It fails emphatically to exhibit the pre-
monitory symptoms of truth. And, apart
from all other considerations, these are
strong counts against it.
But, as a system of philosophy, — and
as, essentially, a theory of matter and
knowledge, — Christian Science is even
more obviously unsatisfactory. The
history of idealism in modern times,
from Bishop Berkeley down through
Leibnitz and Kant to Hegel, is one
of the most fascinating chapters in the
story of thought. Moreover, the contest
that raged so long and so fiercely as
to the ultimate nature of knowledge re-
sulted, at least, in establishing the value
of the profound idea that is at the basis
of a thoughtful idealism. The thinkers
of this school felt, not of course for the
first time, but perhaps more centrally
and vividly than their predecessors, that
we had possibly been too hasty in ac-
cepting as final the outer world as it im-
pressed itself upon us. They suggested
that we be cautious in regarding as real
anything which could not be proven real.
And, while they realized that our rela-
tion to the objective world — as mediated
by senses which we must trust absolutely
in their perceptions, though never allow-
ing them to be final in their interpreta-
tions— was an unchangeable fact, they
also realized that the traditional theory
of matter and our relation to it was not
necessarily the true one. The value of
idealism became, of course, apparent;
and men, as usual in history, began to be
extreme. From doubting matter they
came to deny it ; and the fundamental
weakness of idealism, cropping out even
in its most thoughtful exponents, but
painfully obvious in the extremists, was
seen to be its failure to square with whs
we may call — indefinitely, it is true, but
still intelligibly — common sense. To
say that matter is non-existent means
nothing, in the ordinary sense of those
words ; the only way in which it can be
made to mean anything is by interpret-
ing it, not as a statement about matter,
but as an unusual definition of existence.
And it was just this that the profounder
idealists had in mind. It was not the
annihilation of phenomenal existence,
but the distinction of it from real exist
ence which they insisted upon ; so thz
on logical grounds they stand immeasur
ably above the gross philosophy whicl
identifies lack of " existence " with nc
thingness. Yet, on grounds of commor
sense, even this position is a weak one
" The essence of anything," said Spinoz
Christian Science.
437
in his seventh axiom, " which can be con-
ceived as non-existent does not imply ex-
istence." But the point is that matter
cannot be so conceived. For matter is
as existent as anything we know about.
We can conceive of spirits as on a higher
plane of existence because manifesting
qualities which we, intuitively or empiri-
cally, if not arbitrarily, call higher ; but
the qualities which we ascribe to spirit
are as much a matter of perception with
us (though not, it is true, directly per-
ceived by the physical senses) as the qual-
ities which we ascribe to matter. So
that, to discard the findings of percep-
tion is to annihilate not matter only,
but spirit also, and to leave us with no
world to explain. We must ask extreme
idealists to define their terms. When
they say that matter does not exist what
do they mean ? That it really fails to
exhibit extension in space ? Then there
remains for them to explain the illusion,
and they have only substituted one prob-
lem for another ; beside which, they have
denied to the one object we know which
seems to exhibit extension in space that
attribute without the manifestation of
which by matter the whole conception of
extension in space becomes unthinkable.
Or do they mean that extension in space
can be exhibited by an object which does
not exist ? Then they are merely defin-
ing existence in a new way, and species
of existence must now be distinguished.
What then do they take as a standard ?
Spii-itual existence ? This itself is a mat-
ter of perception, and there is nothing to
show that it exhibits more stigmata of
reality than material existence — what-
ever you may hypothecate about its im-
mortality or self -consciousness, which are,
after all, only added attributes to an al-
ready existent object. Or do they speak
in terms of abstract existence ? Then I
answer that their statements mean no-
thing ; for while abstract existence may
be a dialectical entity, it is far more rea-
sonable to suppose that an object, with
which we are brought into actual relation
with every activity of the cells of our
sense-organs, really is, than to imagine
that existence is monopolized by a some-
thing the conception of which simply
passes human understanding ; unless we
only hypothecate it as a basis for the
actual world with which we have to do,
and so make that world not final, but a
manifestation of something more funda-
mental. But philosophy must be more
than a " soulless play of concepts." It
will not do merely to " play bricks with
words " and imagine that we are doing
a grown man's work. It is possible, I
suppose, by way of analogy, to talk of
dry water. But it is ridiculous ; as it
is always ridiculous for men to adopt the
concepts of another universe than their
own and apply them to present condi-
tions. We mean nothing when we talk
in terms of another existence. The world
of matter and the world of spirit are the
two worlds with which we have actually
to do ; and to talk of one of them as illu-
sional is an attempt to view life with
a perspective which only omniscience
makes possible. " A dream which all
dream together/' said Kant, " and which
all must dream, is not a dream, but real-
ity." " That which is probable for all,"
said Aristotle, " is certain." And, prac-
tically, too, the theory is unsatisfactory.
For, granted that external objects have
no existence save as subjective ideas, how
will that change my relation to them ?
I cannot destroy my sensations ; and so
long as I have sensations the illusion
stays. While eyes and ears and hands
remain the fashion, the world will exist
for me ; and my belief that it does not
exist in itself, but only in my mind, can
alter in no respect my practical attitude
toward it. If subjective idealism means
merely that matter and spirit manifest
themselves in different ways, then it is a
self-evident truth ; if it means that all
our knowledge is a knowledge of rela-
tions, and that the unconditioned is at-
tainable by faith alone, then it is, if not
the truth, at least defensible ; but if it
438
Christian Science.
means, on the other hand, that matter
can be actually proven non-existent, then
it is a philosophy which, though conceiv-
ably tenable for omniscience, is ridiculous
and unpractical as a theory of life for
finite man.1
So much for idealism per se. The un-
compromising idealism, however, which
Mrs. Eddy offers us not only has these
defects, but is guilty of a far more seri-
ous charge. It poses as an explanation,
and is in reality a total evasion. To
deny that matter exists, and assert that
it is an illusion, is only another way of
asserting its existence ; you are freed
by your suggestion from explaining the
fact, but forced by it to explain the il-
lusion. It is the old mistake of imagin-
ing that an escape from a problem is a
solution. You are out of the frying-pan,
it is true, but you are in the fire instead.
Christian Science philosophy makes sen-
sations and dreams analogous ; but it is
a fallacy to attempt to analogize two
activities which not only are felt to be
different in kind, but which bear a sug-
gestive time relation to each other, and
without the previous occurrence of one
of which the other can never be shown
to function. And this is the fact about
sensations and dreams. I smell a rose,
and that night I dream of what I have
done. Both acts, says Mrs. Eddy, are
dreams. Then, I answer, how do you
account for my recognition of the two
activities as different in kind ? If all
psychic phenomena are dreams, why do
I recognize only certain psychic phe-
nomena as dreams ? To equate illusion
and sensation is to balance inches with
pounds; and it explains neither. The
great ideal philosophers recognized this
inadequacy; though it was Berkeley's
weakness that he failed to recognize it
clearly. Kant, Leibnitz, Fichte, and
Hegel were idealists with a qualifica-
tion ; and this qualification was their
1 For a recent statement, in more philosophi-
cal form, of the epistemology here advanced,
see Reality and Delusion, by August Kirch-
salvation. But Mrs. Eddy has strength-
ened her position in no such way. For
the testimony of the senses is, to her,
absolutely unacceptable : not because it
fails to be final, but because it is essen-
tially false. She quite ignores the fact
that while, so long as we have no extrin-
sic standard, it may be impossible to
demonstrate the reliability of the senses'
reports, it is equally, and for the same
reason, impossible to prove their unreli-
ability. And matter, which idealism had
warned us against accepting as known
or knowable, Mrs. Eddy rejects, not as
unproven, but as proven non-existent.
In a word, she has jumped at a conclu-
sion in a way that is pathognomonic of
dilettanteism. From slight hints which
Nature gives that, in certain details, the
external world is not just as our senses
report it, the wild hypothesis is, I will
not say arrived at, but rushed at, that
everything with which our senses have
to do is a deep, base lie. She tells us
that inasmuch as we cannot be sure that
the external world does exist as we per-
ceive it, we must be sure that it does
not exist at all ; whereas the conservative
and rational theory, which the facts sug-
gest, is that the report of the senses, so
far from being rejected, is to be sin-
cerely accepted : but always under the
condition that the perceptions be sub-
ject to mental interpretation. " Do not
conclude," says Browning, "that the
child saw nothing in the sky because he
assuredly did not see a flying horse there
as he says."
While Christian Science, then, is so
closely allied to this fundamental posi-
tion of philosophy, it must not, for a
moment, be supposed that it rises or
falls with the rise or fall of idealism.
The latter, in its healthy manifestations,
is one of the profoundly true positions
of modern thought, for it makes the
valuable fundamental distinction be
mann. American Journal of Psychology, Julj
October, 1903.
Christian Science.
439
tween conditioned and non-conditioned
existence ; but Christian Science onto-
logy is not healthy ideal metaphysics,
and the very best that can be said for
it is that it wildly hypothecates what
the extreme interpretation of ideal-
ism merely suggests. Transcendentally
speaking, we can never show that mat-
ter either has or has not real existence.
The weakness lies not in suggesting that
it may not exist, — philosophers recog-
nize that clearly enough, — but in assert-
ing dogmatically that it does not exist ;
and Mrs. Eddy has taken the weakest
portions of a weak philosophy, and, by
subtracting its elements of strength, has
made it weaker still.
Her treatment of Evil, too, — mani-
festing itself in the favorite trio : sin,
sickness, and death, — is equally unsatis-
factory from the philosopher's point of
view. The explanation of each is its
non-existence ; the origin of the illusion
is simply neglected. Here, for example,
is a man from whom you have removed
the heart. He is dead, according to our
ignorant and loose use of the word.
" No," says Mrs. Eddy, " that statement
shows a subjective illusion." " Whence
did this illusion arise ? " I ask. " From
custom," is the reply ; " men have
learned to associate the supposed ab-
sence of a non-existent heart with the
illusion, death." kt But," I say, " back
in primitive times, before there were
customs or majority opinions, before
men had learned to connect the heart
with life at all, what started the illusion,
death ? " And there is absolute and
ridiculous silence. She has done nothing
more, you see, than define death — and
the same holds true of sickness — in an
unusual way ; but incapable of a large
vision, and ignorant of the distinction
between proximate and ultimate causes,
she persuades herself that she has really
explained the mystery.
Moreover, aside from all theoretical
considerations, the practical solution of
suffering which the heroes of life and
thought have given us, and have proven
practicable by applying it to the sorrow
and limitations and cruel obstacles in
their own careers, has in it so much of
nobility and bravery, so little of hypo-
crisy and willing blindness to facts, —
rings, in a word, so true to the highest
ideas and ideals of life, — that the dis-
cordant clang of this panacea grates
on a discriminating taste. Blind John
Milton, " bearing the mild yoke " in a
life of high-minded and stimulating con-
tent ; Stevenson refusing to allow medi-
cine bottles and bloody handkerchiefs
to color his view of things ; martyrs and
saints in high places and low, going cheer-
fully and usefully to work in a world
whose ugliest facts are best known to
them in some circumstances of their own
lives, which are there to be triumphed
over, but which, nevertheless, are there :
does not this attitude appeal by its frank-
ness and bravery and nobility where
Christian Science disgusts by its insin-
cerity and bravado and lack of refine-
ment ? " That he is unhappy," writes
Epictetus, " is an addition which each
one must make for himself ; " signifi-
cantly calling attention to the facts which
must exist before our attitude can be
added, and reminding us that the nature
of the addition we make determines the
character of our philosophy — whether of
hope or despair — and the outcome of our
living — whether in triumph or defeat.
The theology which Mrs. Eddy offers
us is nothing more nor less than panthe-
ism. It is true that she denies this ac-
cusation often and strenuously ; but, as
a matter of fact, no grosser statement
of the pantheistic position has ever been
made than when Mrs. Eddy attempts
to eliminate matter by maintaining that
if it existed and had real dimensions,
God would by it be actually elbowed out
because there would be no room for Him
in space. The philosophical argument
against pantheism is, of course, well
enough known, and, it may be thought,
admits of satisfactory answer. I wish
440
Christian Science.
here only to point out the inconsistency
of Mrs. Eddy's adoration of the Bible,
on the one hand, and her absolute mon-
ism, on the other. The man who has
finally accepted pantheism should, in-
deed, take his Bible from the philosoph-
ical shelf and treat it henceforth as mere
literature. His thinking from that time
on, if it is to be characterized by sincer-
ity and brave honesty, must find some
other foundation than the book of the
Christians : for to attempt to insinuate
pantheism in the Biblical philosophy is
an experiment in dovetailing, the miser-
able results of which are among Mrs.
Eddy's most obvious failures.
But if the system is heretical on the
philosophical side, it is even more so as
science. Nothing, I suppose, is more
characteristic of the best science than
accuracy of observation and carefulness
in recording it ; yet you will find Mrs.
Eddy's method as loose in the latter re-
spect as it is inconsistent in quoting and
arguing from the evidence of the former.
Having positively overthrown the senses'
testimony, you might be surprised to
find the Christian Scientist proving her
cures from data obtained by those same
senses ; but that is because you do not
understand the Divine Science. And
to one used to the reports of experiments
written with a carefulness of detail that
makes accurate deduction possible, Mrs.
Eddy's clinical records are somewhat
startling. Let us take a few examples.
In order to prove that man is neither
young nor old a story is told of a wo-
man, who, becoming insane and losing
all account of time, literally grew no
older. Now I am curious enough to ask
whether a microscopical examination of
her tissues actually showed no senile
changes ; also, if she died ; and if so,
how it was explained on the hypothesis
that death is an illusion ? A scientific
observer would follow a case to the end.
Again, we are frequently told of cures
of "consumption " and of " organic dis-
ease," but I am impudent enough to ask,
in the first place, how the healer knew
what disease she had in charge ; and, in
the second place, what warrant she had
for considering it cured. In view of the
popular misconceptions on medical sub-
jects and the similarity of Mrs. Eddy's
claims to the conventional quackery, I
must ask something more definite than
mere lay assertions : bacteriological and
pathological and clinical testimony, for
example. For if ever there was debate
in which appeal to demonstration could
be final, the discussion about the cure of
disease is that debate. Here is a novel
treatment claiming definitely to accom-
plish certain things ; and Medicine, her-
self somewhat familiar with the condi-
tions of the case, says quite fairly and
reasonably, " Well and good ; but show
us your results." And what has the an-
swer been ? Has the case been ingenu-
ously submitted to competent judges ?
Has the slightest effort been made, by
those who claim to have here a balm for
every ill, to ascertain the facts and pub-
lish them for the conviction of the be-
nighted world in which Mrs. Eddy has
such a keen maternal interest ? You may
search the " literature " of the subject
through, but you will find not a single
complete clinical history, not the record
of one careful examination, nothing, from
hark away to kill, beyond the " I say so "
of laymen and laywomen who could not
tell a floating cartilage from a floating
kidney, or a malarial parasite from a
cobra de capello. For, though " yarbs "
have cured their thousands, and simples
their tens of thousands, you will still find
men, like Judge Ewing of Boston, who
ought to know something of the nature of
evidence, throwing the whole weight of
the Christian Science structure on simi-
lar and equally convincing testimony.
But to this deplorable inaccuracy
added a looseness of statement and of
gument that is simply laughable. " Lon-
gevity is increasing," Mrs. Eddy tel
us, " for the world feels the alterative
Christian Science.
441
effect of Truth." Is this guessing or
statistics ? Does she seriously mean to
tell us that since 1865, or thereabouts,
the slight hold that Christian Science
has had on the world has really length-
ened life ? Could statistics culled in a
period covering only thirty-eight years
really prove anything as to longevity and
its cause ? Has she any scientific un-
derstanding of the meaning of statistics
and of the tremendous periods they must
cover in order to be of value ? " It is
proverbial," we are told again, " that so
long as you read medical works you will
be sick ; " and the expansion of a fal-
lacy with a semblance of truth in it
into such a lie as that is expected to
appeal to hard-headed men ! " The ear
really hears not," Mrs. Eddy tells us in
her typical dogmatic way ; but such a
glib statement is surely capable of de-
monstration, and if the demonstration
has been wanting, it is fair to assume
that the statement is prattle. Will she
stuff her ears and tell me what I am
saying ? " Brain," we are told, " is the
material stratum of the human mind, a
mortal consolidation of material men-
tality and its suppositional activities ; "
and we are not surprised that a mind
which can call that mess of words a de-
finition — in face of the fact that all
materiality has previously been denied
— runs into argument after argument
whose weakness and looseness are ob-
vious to the slightest thought. Here
are a few samples of such logic. The
simple fact that the sun's apparent ro-
tation is really due to the movement
of the earth is made a proof of the
unreliability of the senses' testimony.
" Until this false testimony of the eye
was rebuked by clearer views of the
everlasting facts it deluded the judgment
and induced false conclusions ; " but, as
a matter of fact, the testimony of the
eye falsely interpreted, so far from be-
ing rebuked by clearer views, was set
straight by that same eye - testimony,
rightly interpreted. It was not the tes-
timony, but the meaning of it, that was
at fault ; and it is the most specious sort
of logic which can argue away the value
of the sense-organs by quoting conclu-
sions based on the work done by those
very organs. It is obvious enough that
the brain is necessary back of the senses ;
but that does not eliminate the senses.
For Copernicus, as for Ptolemy, the
thing seen was a moving sun ; Astro-
nomy was reborn only when an old ob-
servation received a new and true inter-
pretation.
Again, notice the absurd explanation
of the action of drugs. '' When the sick
recover," we are told, " by the use of
drugs, it is the law of general belief, cul-
minating in individual faith, which heals ;
even if you take away the individual
confidence in a drug . . . the chemist,
. . . the doctor, and the nurse equip the
medicine with their faith, and the ma-
jority of beliefs rules." Acetanilid, then,
reduces temperature, by action on the heat-
coordinating nerve centre, because the
majority of men, or the patient himself,
believe this to be the case. Well, the
fact is that the majority of men have never
heard of acetanilid, or the heat centre ;
that there was a time when practically
no one had heard of the drug, and yet it
had the very action that it now exhibits ;
that the explanation of its power, as due
not essentially to an effect on metabolism
but to an increase of heat-dissipation
through a vaso-motor change, had to win
its way to its present universal accept-
ance in the face of scientists' previous
unanimous belief that the opposite was
the case ; that the drug itself, in spite of
the majority opinion of those who know,
— that it will always reduce fever, —
sometimes fails to do so even when ex-
hibited in maximal quantities ; and that
its action, so far from being dependent
on the patient's belief, is observed in ani-
mals, which may reasonably be assumed
to have no belief on the subject whatever !
Again, Mrs. Eddy has loosely ignored
origins. She neglects the fact that a ma-
442
Christian Science.
jority opinion must start somewhere ; and
she betrays a lamentable ignorance of the
frequency, in the history of pharmacolo-
gy, with which an established majority
belief has been overthrown by the ideas
of one man. Her explanation, besides,
takes no account of the varying action of
drugs when exhibited under varying con-
ditions. Some of the antipyretics, for
example, fail to reduce temperature when
the connection between body and basal
ganglia is broken ; yet there can be only
one majority opinion at one time, and this
is not affected by an operation on an un-
conscious dog's brain. If belief were the
essence of therapeutics, patent medicine
would, long ere this, have induced para-
dise : as a myriad dupes could testify.
But no less deplorable than her inac-
curacy and speciousness is Mrs. Eddy's
ignorance of elemental natural history, —
an ignorance quite unimportant except
for the fact that she has not only claimed,
but actually usurped, the function of ora-
cle to a large and growing clientele.
When a finger is amputated we are told
that the nerve is gone which we say had
been the occasion of pain in the finger ;
and referred pain after amputation is
made to prove that sensation is inde-
pendent of matter. This is inexcusable
ignorance. The nerve is not gone; and
pain is, of course, just as possible, as it
is possible for water to run through a
hose with its nozzle wanting ; or, in Weir
Mitchell's simile, as it is possible to ring
a doorbell from any point along the
wire as well as from the knob itself.
The appearance of the horizon on the
retina is cited as a proof of the falsity of
sense testimony ; here sky and earth ap-
pear to meet when, as a matter of fact
(we are told this as though it were a new
idea), they do nothing of the kind. Well,
Mrs. Eddy is apparently ignorant of the
fact that the retina alone does not give
us our idea of the outside world ; that a
complicated system of fibres, known as
the optic tract, and a part of the brain in
the region of the calcarine fissure are
part and parcel of the visual apparatus.
If apparent vision proves the sense-organ
a liar, what about the sight of the mind
without an organ of vision ? Does a
blind man see truly ?
Unscientific, too, is the charlatanry
with which the author of Science and
Health appropriates for proof, as re-
sults of her system, cases in which that
system has not been applied. It is a
popular misconception that the thera-
peutics of Christian Science is identical
with the therapeutics of Mental Science ;
that both teach the annihilation of exist-
ent disease by the superior influence of
spirit over existent matter. True mental
therapeutics is, however, as a matter of
fact, based on the theory that disease is
a molecular disorder, and that the power
of mind is curative by reason of its abil-
ity to bring order out of molecular chaos ;
while obviously, Mrs. Eddy teaches no-
thing of the kind. " The remedy for
disease," as she outlines it, " lies in prob-
ing the trouble to the bottom, in finding
and casting out, by denial, the error of
belief which produces a mortal disorder,
and never honoring it with the title of
law or yielding obedience to it ; " and yet
in nearly every one of her reported cures
such a procedure is conspicuous by it
absence ! It is the boldest kind of aj
propriation to assume that a given cui
is the result of a therapy which has not
been applied in the case, but which has
been replaced by methods of treatment
whose power is perfectly well recognized.
And appropriation is only a parlor name
for theft.
But, again, Mrs. Eddy is unscientific
in her attitude toward the Bible. This,
she noisily claims, over and again, as her
sole guide ; but when we press the mat-
ter home we find that the Bible means ar
allegory based on the Hebrew Scriptures
interpreted so as to accord with a specia
pleader's views, and mutilated till it suj
ports them. It is a canon of scientific
criticism that the right meaning of a pa
sage is the meaning it would naturall)
Christian Science.
443
have conveyed to those for whom it was
written. In this light read Mrs. Eddy's
" Spiritual interpretation " of the Lord's
Prayer, which (though I say nothing of
the actual mutilation where, by altering
the hortatory of the original Greek, the
petition " Thy Kingdom come " is made
to read " Thy kingdom is come," and is
interpreted as a statement of a proposi-
tion of Christian Science) which, I say,
were it not so blasphemous, would be as
ridiculous as it is unscientific ; and then
place with it her interpretation of Simon's
impetuous reply, " Thou art the Christ,
the son of the living God " (by which he
meant, she says, " The Messiah is what
Thou hast declared — Christ, the divine
idea of Truth and Life which heals men-
tally ") ; and, though you are ignorant
of her ridiculous, fragmentary view of
Genesis and of numerous other absurd in-
terpretations which defy every principle
of criticism, you have in these two quota-
tions alone sufficient patents of quackery.
But the last item in the indictment is
that Christian Science is fundamentally
unchristian, — a charge made, not against
one who has refused intellectual assent
to a certain faith, in which case it would
be a statement and no charge, but
against one confessedly committed to the
very tenets thus wantonly emasculated,
in which case the question of honesty
naturally arises. For Christianity cer-
tainly embodies some ideas, and you can-
not, without hypocrisy, bow piously in the
creed, and then go about denying in the
voice of the street what you have just in-
toned. And central in the Christian the-
ology stands the idea of the Atonement ;
for it is the one idea, to say nothing of
the uniqueness of its Christian form, in-
timately incorporated in, and expressly
developed by, Jewish ritualistic history,
Psalms and Prophecy, Christ's own
words, and the writings of apostles and
fathers alike. To deny it may be to take
a perfectly rational position ; but of one
thing there is no question : it is to take a
thoroughly antichristian position.
I offer no theory of the Atonement ;
nor do I pretend here to defend the tra-
ditional theory. I make all reasonable
allowance for the honest difference of
opinion which has long existed on every
side of the question, among those whose
ideas we are bound to respect, as to the
correct interpretation of the mystery. I
ask for no hard-and-fast definition of a
phenomenon which men can no more ex-
plain than comprehend. I plead neither
for a vicarious, nor for a symbolic, nor
for an idealistic interpretation. But I
do say that, given a belief in the essen-
tial truth of the Bible, no one can dare
honestly to call himself a Christian who
does not regard Christ's death as sacrifi-
cial, whatever interpretation he may sub-
sequently make of that word. And the
point is that logically, whatever may be
Mrs. Eddy's method of smoothing over
this obvious defect, the whole idea of the
Atonement, whether interpreted sacrifi-
cially or not, should be rejected by Chris-
tian Science ; for, having annihilated sin
as a fact in life, what need is there for a
savior from sin ? But it is characteris-
tic of Mrs. Eddy to reject so much of a
system of thought as flies counter to her
hypotheses, and to accept enough to serve
for a captious catch-call. Nazarene, not
Christian, should she be called, — as
Canon Liddon said of Martineau. The
Resurrection, too, — which most Chris-
tian thinkers rationally regard as a cen-
tral fact in Christian apologetics, — Mrs.
Eddy will have none of. She does not
deny the historical fact, — we might
sympathize with her if she did. But she
interprets the fact away. It is not, she
tells us, a demonstration of Christ's
divinity, but of man's divinity. Christ
rose — that is, spirit overcame matter —
in order to show that man may do the
same. " Anybody can do that," is her
Easter hymn ; and it seems only a fail-
inference to draw that a system which re-
jects both Atonement and Resurrection
does little less than masquerade when it
poses as Christian.
444
Christian Science.
But it is in her attitude toward the
Scriptures that Mrs. Eddy is most
brazenly unchristian. This shows itself,
first, in literal contradiction ; for exegesis
with her means acceptance of so much
of the Bible as aligns itself with her
hypotheses, and flat contradiction of the
rest. Her pages bristle with assertions
most strikingly opposed to the state-
ments of the Book she loves so much, and
the opposition extends, in many cases,
to verbal gainsaying. But what are we
to expect ? We cannot ask literal con-
sistency of one whose theory of interpre-
tation allows her to accept as revealed
truth two chapters and five verses of
Genesis because so much of it answers
her needs, and to reject as Error's
Story the rest of the account, for the
very acceptable reason that it fails to
square with her ideas ! The fact is,
Mrs. Eddy's loving adoration of the
Bible shrivels, under the light of inves-
tigation, to the crassest maudlin senti-
ment. She is innocent of exegesis. Eise-
gesis she has substituted for it, and she
has* done it clumsily.
It often happens, however, that heresy
hi spirit is more serious than crime
against the letter : and Mrs. Eddy's is a
case in point. Her philosophy is more
blasphemous than her exegetical mutila-
tion. The Bible has little or nothing to
say as to the origin of evil ; for the ac-
count of the Fall is, after all, not an ex-
planation, but a description. But it has
a great deal to say on man's attitude to-
ward the problem. I suppose it says it
nowhere more fully nor more clearly
than in the Book of Job : the book which,
Mr. Froude tells us, " will one day be
seen towering up alone, far away above
all the poetry of the world." I take it
that that book teaches essentially three
things as to suffering : first, that it is
really here ; second, that God, if not its
author, has, at least, an overseeing part in
it ; and third, that the solution consists,
not in denial of the fact, but in one's atti-
tude toward the fact. In one line — mag-
nificent and triumphant — the man of Uz
outlined the attitude toward suffering
which found favor with God. " Though
he slay me, yet will I trust him ; " that
was the optimism of Job. And the
whole Bible teaches no other. From
Genesis to Revelation the word is, En-
dure ; and Christ himself never at-
tempted to treat as anything less than
fact the sorrow of the world, before his
share of which even his own bravery al-
most flinched. There is nowhere the
slightest Scriptural warrant for expect
ing immunity from pain. No rosy pic-
ture is anywhere drawn. The only solu-
tion of the problem from first to last
is the old-fashioned trust of intelligent
resignation. And the drama of Job,
aligning itself with Scripture as a whole,
teaches as plainly as drama can teach
that faith is the only philosophy which
can square with God's demands ; that,
as Mr. Froude puts it, " no clearer or
purer faith is possible for man than that
which Job achieved when he learned to
feel that he could do without happiness
that it was no longer essential, that he
could live on and still love God and cling
to Him." This is the answer of the He-
brew poem to the world's great question :
Be brave and trust ; for " only to those
who have learned to say ' We can do
without happiness, it is not what we ask
or desire,' is there no secret." But for
Christian Science the opposite is
truth. With a flare of bravery that
nothing more than bravado, a foolisl
claim of certainty is substituted for
majestic and triumphant faith. Suffei
ing is no longer a mystery and trust
impossible. The grim philosophy of Jot
which has seldom failed in history
lead to the sturdy faith that makes mer
is swept away at a blow ; and in its pi
we have the effeminate bravery of a vi
gar creed of certainty. Essentially
lacks nobility. If it had been regarde
as truth from the first, history woulc
have lost its chapter of heroes. It stands
condemned by rational philosophy
Christian Science.
445
shamed by Christian faith ; and by its
fundamental opposition to the Scriptural
theory of the solution of the problem of
evil, it brands itself as criminally incon-
sistent. It is nothing less than blasphemy
— and blasphemy of the most insidious
kind — to distort the plain philosophy of
the Bible, until it offers men the pathetic
delusion that they are to escape completely
the suffering, without a relatively large
share of which no human being has been
known to pass his threescore and ten.
The essential unsoundness of practical
Christian Science lies here : that a phi-
losophy is proposed which assumes man
made purposely for perfect happiness in
this dispensation, — an assumption at
once gratuitous if observation base phi-
losophy, and groundless if Holy Writ be
the standard. It is not, as Dr. Wace
said in a very different connection, that
things ought not to be so explained, but
that they cannot be. Mrs. Eddy's op-
position to the spirit of the Bible is even
more fundamentally heretical than her
contradictions of its letter ; and the evi-
dence of infidelity to professed standards,
corroborating the evidence of historical,
philosophical, and scientific weakness,
points to the fact, or, — if knowledge
may never get higher than probability, —
to the extremely well-founded probabil-
ity that Christian Science is, at the best,
a long, long way from the truth.
m.
The bald facts of life may be said to
be the legitimate forbears of pessimism ;
the possibilities of life the legitimate for-
bears of meliorism ; and rose-water op-
timism a bastard for which indifference,
ignorance, or inexperience is responsible.
Pessimism is here ; meliorism must be
constructed. Material for it exists, no
doubt ; but it is not obvious, does not ob-
trude like the other, — must, indeed, be
sought for with diligence, and marshaled,
even whipped, into line before any ser-
viceable theory results. That the Evil
of the world is a reality, that improve-
ment is a possibility, but that equation of
facts with our highest desires is an ex-
treme improbability : this is a creed to
which, I suppose, the most wholesomely
thoughtful among men would not hesitate
to subscribe. " Panacea " and " De-
spair " are twin devil-words, which, de-
spite their fascination, history has blot-
ted from thoughtful language. Healthy-
minded men, while they do not blind
themselves by gazing straight at the sun,
are broad enough, at the same time, not
to turn backs to the sun and spend their
lives with eyes on the shadows. Not to
emphasize either the cloud or the lining,
but to stand aside that we may see both,
— this is the liberalism of culture. Evil
is a fact ; but possibility of improvement
is also a fact ; and the honest seeker af-
ter truth must not look so intently at the
former as to be blind to the latter. Men
who have known what it is to suffer and
to see others suffer are cruel if they are
not ever ready to accept any innovation
that gives promise of amelioration. But
such men, aware of the terrifying power
of disease, and of the pathetically help-
less attitude which medicine must take
before so many of its manifestations, will
turn with a sickening sense of disappoint-
ment and disgust, and a humiliating feel-
ing of tricked credulity, from the boastful
claims of Christian Science. Its ridicu-
lous extremism, unsupported by dignity,
breadth, or logic, marks it unmistakably
as charlatanry. It ignores the past, as
it defies the future. It makes limitless
claims, substitutes assertion for proof,
prefers the captious to the logical,
abounds in contradiction, never hesitates
to shift ground when the enemy's firing
grows hot, answers unanswerable argu-
ment with suave evasion, contents itself
with the most obviously superficial rea-
soning, appropriates as its own work
what is manifestly the work of others :
in a word, exhibits absolutely no points
of strength, courage, or consistency, but
preserves an unbroken monotony of fan-
tastical word-play that, were it true,
446
Christian Science.
would be as hopelessly unpractical as,
being false, it is hopelessly unappealing.
And when all is said and done, what does
it offer suffering men ? Why, this emi-
nently satisfying advice : that to ignore
obstacles is to overcome them ; that to
avoid the precipice we must close our
eyes and be blind to it ; that the darkness
of night is to be illuminated by blowing
out the stars ! And what is the word
with which we are sent back to a world
of error and ignorance and sin and suf-
fering ? That God's service is the dead-
ening of sensation ; that a world of brave-
ly struggling individuals must be trans-
formed into a raft of logs : heroes and
God's men being the most thoroughly
anaesthetized among them !
And yet it is interesting to inquire
whether the " genetic succession of
ideas " may not be found to account for
the presence in the world — not of Chris-
tian Science, for that certainly can be
given no place in so distinguished an evo-
lution, but — of the general mental move-
ment of which it is but one, and that a
pathological, manifestation. And I think
the people who are fond of the word " in-
evitable " might use it with some effect
in this connection. It might, for instance,
be found that a movement, no matter how
exorbitant, which tended to restrain a
popular mind now in extravagant ecsta-
sy over a purely natural method could,
where it touched thought at all, only im-
prove it. For it ought not to be forgotten
that the great problem as to the ultimate
nature of matter and spirit is not yet
really laid ; nor assumed that it will ever
be solved by a " wave of the critical
hand." History has, it is true, shown
the practical results of spiritual intoxi-
cation : volatilization of activity with
nothing more virile than asceticism left.
But it has also shown something of the
other extreme, — prostitution of activity,
degradation of purpose, and worship of
license that come when a people has
*' sucked — got drunk — at the nipple of
sense." And it may quite conceivably
be true that we need, both in our philoso-
phy and in our life, a reminder of the
mental problem, so busy are we with the
concerns of the physical. For Science, •
a loose enough word to be sure, but one
suggesting pretty definitely the attitude
of mind which inaccurate usage has assc
ciated with it, — having passed her non-
age and reached her proverbially dan-
gerous majority, begins to assume the
precarious function of making the tra-
ditions ; and mindful, perhaps, of the
bullying to which she was subjected in
youth, when the traditions had another
source, she has in some instances be£
to bully in turn. We have, for example,
but the other day, seen a book — the
reasoning of which was pronounced from
a high source to be a disgrace to the phi-
losophy of Germany — set the scientific
world agape, and the pseudo-scientific
herd hurrying along after it like hungry
sheep, for no better reason than that the
author spoke the tongue of science like a
native, — the tongue from the vocabulary
of which " authority " and its synonyms
were once blotted with such gusto. It is
quite easy, indeed, to forget the limits be-
yond which Roger Bacon long ago stated
that scientific explanation had no right
to go ; and, rushing into metaphysics, to
indulge in dogmatism far more sweeping
than that which is criticised so keenly in
the opponents.
But the simple fact remains that the
question " Whence ? " still goes unan-
swered save for the old-fashioned reply ;
and the chief objection to that rejoinder
seems to be that it clashes, not with
truth, but with the new traditions, —
which is a sort of reversed echo from the
past with a ring Science ought to reco|
nize. And while we cannot complain if
Science refuse to dally with that question,
— indeed the point is that her sphere
lies entirely this side of it, and has to dc
with that other question, " How ? " — we
are right in complaining if she presumes,
with no more data than are now at hand,
to answer it definitely with any othe
Christian Science,
447
word than the traditional one. Sugges-
tive phenomena, too, keep crowding to
the front with every advance in know-
ledge, which make it idle blandly to dis-
miss the metaphysical element in living
activity.
In calling attention to this limitation
of a purely natural method, it is by no
means necessary, of course, to degrade
criticism to tirade. It would be idle, as
it would be unjust, to attempt to detract
from the glory of the recent triumphs of
Natural Science. The term, indeed, has
been not so much developed as made
anew. Old fields have been worked out
and fresh ones opened. New hypotheses,
new methods, and a new spirit, — what
could these beget save an almost new
world of thought ? Instruments hitherto
undreamed of for their delicacy and in-
genuity, a technique almost fantastic in
some of its refinements, an equipment
made possible by the combination of
growing interest and growing wealth, a
spirit almost religious in its enthusiasm,
fidelity, high ideals, and intolerance of
defect, — these are some of the forces
whose resultant we see in that array of
facts and figures, laws and hypotheses,
truths and guesses, which, massed to-
gether, we know as Science. And the
questioner has known no bounds. Birth
and death, hitherto restraints to inquiry,
no longer block the way. Research re-
fuses to confine her labors to the day of
Life. She will prevent the morning ;
and far into the dark, when only the
stars are burning, she will carry the
query with a brave spirit, a triumphant
hope, and what light from the day her
ingenuity can devise. " But do not con-
clude from this," the mental philosophy
might say, " that the whole problem has
been cleared up." The " Topsy " theory
of things — that they " just growed " —
has yet to prove itself the final theory ;
Feuerbach's definition of man (" Er ist
was er isst ") has not given quite the
complete satisfaction once prophesied
and hoped for ; mental causation, as
Martineau said, has not been success-
fully reduced to physical by diluting it
with duration ; nor is there now any
more reason than in Romanes's day for
concluding that, when " a phenomenon
has been explained by means of natural
causation, it has thereupon ceased to be
ascribable to God." It is, moreover, to
put it mildly, hasty epistemology to echo
the trite and tiresome monotone running
through thought and literature to-day :
" We know only what we see or feel or
taste or hear or smell ; " and any system,
be it Christian Science or what not,
which strikes a blow at this cheap sort
of precipitate conclusion from quite in-
adequate data has, to that extent, struck
for fairness, if not for the truth.
But such considerations as these lead
us somewhat afield ; for our most obvious
task, in view of the popular identifica-
tion of Christian Science with its thera-
peutics, is to determine whether this
thought-deformity — whatever may be
our criticism of its metaphysics — has
really anything of value to offer ortho-
dox medicine as regards either its theory
or its practice. Now it must never be
forgotten that the moment we make
philosophical inquiry into the nature of
disease we enter on a devious path
leading through delicate metaphysical
ground. The word itself hardly admits
of exclusive definition ; and, though you
have as you think never so satisfactory
a theory, you will be sore put to it to
understand or explain intelligently many
pathological phenomena lying in the twi-
light realm between perfect health and
outspoken disease. You cannot draw
sharp lines about disease by making it
always depend on a pathological lesion,
and so class those morbid phenomena,
with apparently no such etiology, as illu-
sory conditions. For that test is obvi-
ously impossible always to apply. Nor
will it do to imagine that by introducing
the word " neurasthenia " or " psycho-
sis " the problem vanishes. For pain,
one of the most constant and striking
448
Christian Science.
manifestations of disease, is so obviously
a subjective symptom that our diagnosis
of it as " in the head " not only gives us
no solution of the problem, but is a hair-
fine distinction for the patient, whose
testimony, after all, is the final witness
as to the existence or non-existence of
the condition in question. The problem
of perception is, of course, elusive enough,
attack it where you will ; but when the
question is of such a nature that the
perceptive faculties of more than one
individual may be called into court, we
have, at least, the law of probability to
guide us. So that if one man sees a
golden cross in the sky and a hundred
thousand cannot see it, the verdict can
only be one way. " Illusory pain " can-
not, however, be so easily dealt with ;
so that when Christian Science offers us
a theory of disease which is manifestly
not the true one, Medicine ought to re-
member that her own pathological theory
of the thing, though perfectly satisfac-
tory so far as it goes, ceases to be in-
vulnerable where all natural reasoning
begins to weaken, — at the mysterious
blending of physical and " mental " con-
ditions. As a matter of fact, technical
terminology no more explains " illu-
sional " pathological conditions unasso-
ciated with known lesions, than Chris-
tian Science explains ordinary organic
disease. Virtually an orthodox physician
yields to the Christian Science position
when he talks of " appendicular hypo-
chondriasis ; " but these and similar
perfectly legitimate descriptive words
are disingenuously assumed to be at the
same time explanatory in a far different
sense. So long, however, as we cannot
ourselves offer any explanation that is
satisfactory, a bland dismissal of a the-
ory of disease — which emphasizes, even
if it exaggerates, the mental factors of
pathological conditions — is unwarranted.
For there are certainly clinical facts —
like the curious phenomena of hysteria
— far too suggestive to be waved away ;
and to attempt to cover our low-sound-
ing ignorance with high-sounding wore
is merely to substitute the pretentioi
Latin of the physician for the captious
capitals of Mrs. Eddy, — without anj
gain in the logical appeal. For the
problem is a real one. On this side, ol
vious physical facts ; on that side, quit
as apparent " mental " phenomena ; be
tween them, a mysterious link, the exist
ence of which long ago ceased to be de
batable. What sort of a theory is
which removes or lessens the mystery
Certainly not the one Mrs. Eddy ha
given us, — that to acknowledge the mei
tal factors of disease or health is to make
cancer a phantom. But when that
said the problem still looms, — loor
large despite a scientific shrug, an ii
posing dialect, a condescending smile
How satisfactorily to comprehend the eti-
ological importance of mental states
disease, and the relation of tissue change
to psychoses ; how intelligently to applj
to therapeutics the mental factor whicl
present ignorance forces us to negle
altogether, or to treat as a mere plaj
thing, — these are the problems whicl
the " mental " movement is giving ove
to science for solution. Christian Scienc
may have succeeded in calling more ei
phatic attention to a neglected group
phenomena ; certainly it has failed sat
isfactorily to interpret them. But just
as certainly, in spite of a tendency in-
differently to shun the issue or to regai
the question as a closed one, the la
word is very far from having been sa
on this mysterious subject.
And all this theoretical consideratior
has a very practical bearing. For this
much may at least be said : that, how-
ever great be the limitations in our the
ory, the relation of intelligence to disea
is a clinical reality. In the large major
ity of patients (most typically, perhaps
in those afflicted with tumors) it is hai
to conceive that this relation means any-
thing at all : for there is not the slighte
trustworthy evidence that the course
one of these has ever in a single instam
The Frenchwoman's Son.
449
been affected by the mental state. In
others, however, the " habit of mind "
seems to be an important factor in deter-
mining the occurrence or issue of disease,
— a proposition of no mystical nature
if the well-established relation between
" emotions " and physiological processes
be kept in mind. And if this be true,
as I think it is, the therapeutic deduction
is obvious. Moreover, it is a deduction
which a generation destined to a high-
tension life (such as the coming genera-
tion will necessarily lead) would do well
to write on the tablets of their hearts.
It is not mysticism, but the statement
of clinical inference, to call Descartes'
motto — "tacher tou jours a me vain-
cre " * — good hygiene as well as good
philosophy ; and if the children of to-
day, who are to-morrow's men, be taught
to overcome that sort of selfishness which
centres attention on one's own sensations,
future health will have been potentially
promoted by the relegation to history of
that class who — " habit," with them,
" tending toward disease " (as Burton
said) — enter the large army of the neu-
rasthenics, and worry themselves into
their graves. For the striking fact is that
people of high intelligence and of natu-
ral or studied composure actually offer a
stronger front to disease, other things be-
ing equal, than their weaker brethren.
If a cancer single them out they will, of
course, go the one way, for all their
" willing ; " but with a properly schooled
mind the man of an average constitution,
decently cared for, may actually avoid
that great class of diseases which, though
their etiology is not yet clear, are certain-
ly furthered, if not started, by an impro-
per mental attitude. High-minded and
intelligent indifference to small but an-
noying ailments beyond cavil increases
effectiveness and makes for health.
The history of philosophy has grown
up about three high aims of intellect.
Theories of the Universe, theories of
Knowledge, theories of Evil : these are
the massive concept-systems which As-
piration has left pricking up into history,
relieving the deeps of degeneration, and
ribbing — as mountain ranges stand out
from a continent — the dead flat of self-
content. But Christian Science, exhib-
iting no constructive activity whatever,
has certainly played no part in this crea-
tive work. No peak in the philosophi-
cal landscape reaches, after Mrs. Eddy's
vaporings, one whit nearer heaven. The
most charitable thing to be said is that
attention has again been called to certain
glaring defects and limitations in our
much vaunted towers of Babel.
John W. Churchman.
THE FRENCHWOMAN'S SON.
IT was the year of the coarse April
that the Frenchwoman's son took to the
woods. He had no reason, except that
with the spring he had become abruptly
aware that since his mother's death his
house was intolerable, and that he could
farm no longer on the small holding that
had been hers. It was beyond him to
" TScher toujours plutot a me vaincre que
la fortune et a changer mes de"sirs que 1'ordre
du monde."
VOL. xcin. — NO. 558. 29
dig, and plant potatoes, and raise two
lean pigs to be killed in the fall. He
left Bear Cove without ostentation, and
his absence found it indifferent ; he had
never been an ornament, nor precisely
a reproach ; but neither was he missed.
The priest was the only soul in the par-
ish who stood an instant at the shut door
of the silent, forlorn house, and even he
said nothing. As for his thoughts, they
were more in tune with the ceaseless rain
450
The Frenchwoman's Son.
than with the battering -west wind that
was driving the ice off the shore and lift-
ing up the dull winter grass. But he had
been too cold all winter, and too much
given to fasting that the poor of his flock
might eat, to have much of the spring in
his blood. And the fact remained ; the
Frenchwoman's son was gone.
He had made inland of a rough, gray
morning, and his method of traveling
was the method of the otter, who never
sleeps two nights in the same place ; and
for a fortnight he rioted in it. He sang
to himself as he toiled over the wet, tree-
less barrens ; laughed when he just got
out with his life from the sucking soil
of the Long Swamp, which was not
a thoroughfare ; was exultant when he
came at last to the woods where the trees
were a man's girth round. He had turned
his back on the sea for good and all ; on
the gray swelter of the spring tides ; on
the winter-thickened waves that ran sul-
len, too cold to break ; on the miserable
village that dragged a living out of the
bitter water and the sour, brackish land.
He was free. He did not even mind the
icy rain, nor the wicked gales that blew
all that month, though down on the shore
he had left they would have been another
matter. He was where he belonged ; and
he accepted the rough weather as pla-
cidly as did the just come robins that
sang all round him, no more at home
than he. Things he had never known
came to him spontaneously. He built
and lit his fires of wet wood without any
trouble to speak of, though he had scarce-
ly made a fire out-of-doors in his life ; and
the camp that he began to build one
morning by the head waters of the lonely
Sou'west was done in a way which was
not that of the shore settlements, nor of
any shelter he had ever seen. But it
had a form of its own, and it pleased
him ; also it shed water like a loon's
back, and when he was inside it the roar
and lash of the spring storms might be
sounding like a mighty organ in the great
hemlocks overhead, and the rain sluicing
on the open spaces, but he was in his
house.
"It is," he said to himself thought-
fully, " a camp with long walls." The
words pleased him, and sounded fa-
miliar ; which was absurd, because in all
his twenty years he had never heard of
anything but shingled houses.
He had no plans about life; it was
merely a thing that had been thoroughly
distasteful, and was become an insistent,
ever-present pleasure and excitement ;
and when one morning the sun at la
came out clear and scorching he sat on
drying deadfall and basked in it, am
smelt the spring out of the soggy grounc
He never thought at all of Bear Cove, nc
even of the priest ; and he had been f one
of the priest. His mother had been or
curiously equal terms with the smooth-
faced old man. She had never been a
common woman, no matter what else she
had been in the years she cast behind her
when she arrived in the ugly little Eng-
lish-speaking settlement and bought Jim
Miller's house.
"The Frenchwoman," the village
called her, all but the priest ; who, per-
haps, was sorry for her, for he was kind
to her and the boy, and unoffended by
her wild moods and flinging tongue.
But she had been dead for a year now,
and there was no tombstone over her till
Sandy Brine had time to cut one. Father
Gillespie had not hurried him. There
was in his mind a discrepancy between
his answers to her dying instructions as
to a truthful inscription over her grave,
and those regarding her son. But the
son had cut away the knot of both pro-
mises by his absolute unconsciousness that
there was any to cut. Whereby he sat
and whistled on his sunny perch, and
mocked a song sparrow till it suddenly
flew away. The boy sniffed the air quite
as suddenly, and swung round his long
legs till he faced the east.
An Indian was standing close beside
him. He looked young, but it was not
then the Frenchwoman's son .could tell
The Frenchwoman's Son.
451
an Indian's age. Anyhow, he was not
thinking of it. He sat angry and very
still; and the man greeted him eagerly
•with a long-drawn " Well ? "
" What do you want ? " he asked
roughly. He had been thoroughly star-
tled, for he had not heard a sound of
footsteps. " Do you live here ? "
" Want you." The man regarded him
from under the thatch of stiff hair that
stuck out from his hat. " Your name
John — John Noel ? " He said Noo-el,
with the soft Indian o.
The boy stared. "Yes — But I
don't use that name ! Ba'tiste, I use."
" That all same," said the visitor
blandly. " Ba'tiste your mother call you ;
your father John. You his son, so we
come."
" Whose son ? " snapped John Ba'-
tiste ; he had never heard mention of his
father, nor been particularly concerned
about him.
The Indian took off his hat. " The
Old Man's."
It was Greek to the hearer, to whom
an old man was an old man ; he never
dreamed that the words and the act
were a shibboleth of respect for an In-
dian esteemed next to a chief.
" What old man ? " he asked con-
temptuously ; the thing had nothing to
do with him if his name were John ten
times over.
" He tell me you come some day " —
the question was placidly ignored — " so
we come. Long time ago that — fifteen
year — we don' know ! But he say you
come all same as him."
" You could n't know I was here ! "
" We come see," quietly ; " every year
we come. Old Man my friend ; he say,
' We die. You be good friend my son.
Some time he come to the Sou'west,
where he was born at. You be help to
my son.' "
The listener got down from his log and
spoke with rage. " I was born at Miri-
michi ; and I don't know who you are,
but you never knew my father. He 's
been dead for years, and he never needed
Indians for friends. Where d' ye live ?
Because you 'd better go back there."
The Indian turned away with an ugly
dignity. " Old Man good man to me,
he say you all same ; very well. You
say not so ; very well too. We go."
" Oh, stop. Do you live round here ?
That 's what I want to know." If he
had neighbors he would tramp at once.
" No one live here. No Indian come
but me." He waved his hand around
him. " We come not one time more. Your
house, your place," he observed finally ;
and the Frenchwoman's son affirmed it
with an oath.
Yet his curiosity was awake in him,
and he turned a volley of questions on
his visitor ; but the man walked away
untouched by the demands fired at him.
The Frenchwoman's son never knew
what made him care, but he made a
dash after him and held out his hand.
The Indian seized it, his whole face
changing, till it was another man who
smiled.
" We bring things," he cried ; " flour,
all what you say ! You good friend ;
we give you this. Every year we bring it
here, like Old Man say. He say : ' Good
friend to you, you give it ; bad friend,
you go 'way ! ' ' He fumbled in his
coat and brought out a letter.
The Frenchwoman's son stared at it.
Old, tattered, dirty, and written in char-
acters and a language he did not know,
it could not belong to him. But he took
it. And then a lordly thought struck
him.
" Come in and have something to eat."
Houses still meant eating to him, and his
house was his pride.
The Indian laughed. " We got plenty
meat ! We kill caribou two days back.
You got plenty meat ? "
"Yes." John Ba'tiste was savage
again. It had seemed to him that he
was doing great things by living alone
in the wilderness, and here was a low
person who considered it a storehouse.
452
The Frenchwoman's Son.
" Well," he nodded offendedly, " good-
by ; if you don't want anything to
eat!"
"Adiou," returned the man, and
laughed again. He was gone into the
bushes while the Frenchwoman's son
stood staring stupidly, and wondering
where he had heard people say adieu
with that twist to it before, till suddenly
there came back to him his mother's
daily cry at him : " Will you speak like
a pig and an outcast ? Whistle your u,
I tell you ; shape your mouth ! I will
not have you ' adiou ' like an outcast."
It was funny, and he laughed. Through
the laugh a voice came to him suddenly.
" Bitneby you hungry ; then we come,"
it remarked.
The Frenchwoman's son swore at it,
and retired to his house. He glanced
contemptuously at the extraordinary let-
ter which was meant for somebody else,
and was going to burn it ; only his fire
was out ; and then he applied himself
once more to the joys of doing nothing,
and not caring what time it was ; he had
had to care in the village. Yet daylight
of the next morning found him pulling
the letter out of a crack in his wall, and
staring at it. What if it were for him,
after all? But the queer words were
nothing that he could make out, and only
made him angry ; he put it away again,
and was suddenly aware that he was
lonely, and afraid ; something had taken
the heart out of him. He had no plea-
sure any more in his house, nor in his
prowls over the country. He took to sit-
ting at his door, beside a senseless anxie-
ty. Every now and then he took out the
crazy letter that was not meant for him,
and all he got from it was a biting anger
that he could not read the thing. It
grew to be an obsession ; he woke to it
in the long mornings, could not eat for
the memory of it lying in its chink ;
time and again tried to burn it, and never
did. He let his food give out, because
every day he meant to leave his camp
and the letter in it ; but he never started,
and he knew it was because he had taken
a terror of meeting more men who should
speak to him of his father. It was like
sitting alone in the dark and fearing a
dead man at his elbow, and about as
sensible. If he had been in his white-
washed house by the shore he would have
sickened, but the woods he had loved
kept him whole. They were kind to
him, even while he was hardly conscious
of them. The black birch twigs that he
chewed, just to be chewing, took his bod-
ily fever out of him ; the nameless sweet-
ness in the wind of midnight made him
drowsy ; a hundred things helped him
even while he was careless of all but his
own haunting misery, till one May morn-
ing he woke to find himself lying hungry
at his door with a man between him and
the sunshine.
It was the Indian back again, and a
queer pain jolted the boy's heart, till he
could not think of a word to say. He
saw that the man carried a heavy load,
and that there must be things to eat in
it, but his real thought was that now he
could get at that letter. He swayed on
his feet as he stood up.
The man looked at him curiously.
" We bring things," he said, " we cook ;
bimeby we talk. You call us Sabiel."
He flung down his pack, and the
Frenchwoman's son sat and glared. He
had not eaten fresh meat all that winter,
— it was not an article of diet in Bear
Cove, — and the smell of it made him f 01
get even the letter. As he ate, the stronj
food went to his head like drink, till
sat happy in the sun, and, basking, lit
last fill of tobacco, or meant to. T)
match died in his fingers as he spill<
half his pipeful in his palm and held ii
out to Sabiel, who shook his head.
" Bapkusedumef ! " said he, brinj
out a dirty clay.
The Frenchwoman's son starti
Somewhere, long and long ago, he h;
heard that word time and again. He
swore to himself in French, and Sabiel
smiled uncomprehendingly : —
The Frenchwoman's Son.
453
" We say, we light our pipe ! "
" I know that," snapped the boy,
" though I don't see how you do ; " and
through his angry puzzle a queer phrase
came to him. " Menuagai tamovvayau ! "
said he, very slowly and falteringly ; and
sat back lax and sick. The Indian had
handed him a fig of tobacco, and gab-
bled something in a jargon of which at
least two words were familiar even if
he had not translated the last one as
he pointed to the camp, — " pembtek, a
house with long walls."
" What are you talking ? " screeched
the Frenchwoman's son ; " what kind of
language ? "
" Indian," placidly. " Your father's
talk."
" Indian ! Do you mean my father
was an Indian ? " He hardly knew he
said it, and he did not listen to the an-
swer. He was seeing, as from a long
way off, his mother making a fire on the
ground ; seeing himself, a little boy,
playing with a burning stick, and an In-
dian man laughing where he sat beside
him ; and the man had been his father.
He knew it as he knew he sat now cheek
by jowl with another Indian and under-
stood his tongue. " But my father was a
Frenchman ! " He found his voice with-
out commanding it, and even in the mak-
ing of the words, remembered they had
never been said to him ; he had only
taken them for granted. But he kept on
speaking. " I don't believe you."
Sabiel returned three slow sentences.
They broke the defenses the boy was
trying to make in his mind, because he
knew them to be true ; and the gist of
them checked his heart. He was a half-
breed ; just a half-breed. He knew now
why there had been days when his mo-
ther hated him, knew why the priest had
set him down to books and the choir-
singing as soon as he began to take to
the wind-swept woods over the village.
He had never been meant to know ; and
he saw how easy it had been to keep
him ignorant. They never had Indians
round Bear Cove, never thought of them ;
his mother's French blood had been
enough to carry a darker skin and eyes
than his. Half of his soul rose up in a
dreadful revolt, and half of it in a wilder
exaltation of freedom. He sat and stam-
mered questions at the man on the other
side of the fire, and finally got out what
was last in his mind as it had been first.
The letter : he wanted it read to him.
When he had heard it his eyes were
different. He got up and lit his pipe as
if he had never thrown it away from
him ; and after a long time he spoke,
with a laugh that was not a boy's laugh.
" While I choose to be a white man, I
will be a white man ! " he said, and cast
away salvation ; for in the woods he was
one tiling, and out of them another. He
took the Indian letter he could not read
for himself from where it lay on the
ground, and threw it on the fire, and on
top of it he tossed the red head handker-
chief that had been his mother's. The
old paper blazed, and the common silk
smouldered writhingly, but he did not
look at them ; neither of the two should
ever call to him any more. He would
be a white man now, and make a new
name for himself.
But he never did it, his world being a
jealous world which did its own chris-
tening. There were not ten people who
ever knew him as John Noel, and they
were unimportant, chief among them
being a despised squatter called Welsh,
to whose retired abode he was in the
habit of repairing when he was tired of
being the white man whom his intimates
addressed as Frenchy. As for his offi-
cial name, it was no new one; though
when it cropped up in a lawless country
it stood for a hundred things. Well-
off people shook at the mention of it,
but to the poor and desolate it was an-
other matter. When Sabean the out-
law was finally caught and caged there
were scores of prayers going up that the
Frenchwoman's son might not be caught
too. Sabean had been the terror of two
454
The Frenchwoman's Son.
counties, and, having the poor on his
side, had robbed with impunity ; there
was not a man anxious for his capture
'but his victims and the sheriff, and every
one but they knew he was only the tool
of the Frenchwoman's son. If there
were darker things they were only whis-
pered of; the Frenchwoman's son had
found a world full of friends by the sim-
ple process of placidly, and at once,
cracking down on his enemies. There
was always, or nearly always, a smack of
righteous vengeance in his sins.
When McManus's mill was burned
just as he was bringing down his season's
cut, well-informed people did not con-
sider it an accident, though not one of
them said so ; and the Frenchwoman's
son was unostentatiously elsewhere on
important business, so that the law did
not seek him any more than public gos-
sip named him. It was well for McManus
that he had no insurance, or his friends
would have said he fired his mill him-
self. As it was they smiled crookedly,
and remarked that the attention drawn
to the working of his lumber business
was worse than the fire ; — whereat he
swore impotently, and cast about for ven-
geance, which was not forthcoming ; and
was so unpleasant to Fanny, his house-
keeper, that she ran away of a dark night
with his foreman, and he had to do his
own cooking, which did not cool him.
He began to talk of sending for his only
daughter, who had been banished to her
uncle Welsh's with the advent of Fanny ;
but it was a radical measure, and he put
it off.
The Frenchwoman's son heard nothing
of these last matters because he had gone
out to Welsh's on the Long Swamp to
make love to Welsh's niece.
In the northern woods the spring comes
up in scarlet, leaf and shrub and blossom,
with white drifts of Indian pear flower
flung across a blood-red world. He had
seen the red of it often enough, but it
was the first year in his life he had no-
ticed the white, or thought of the priest
at Secret Lake in connection with a
woman ; and he had known a few as tall
as Welsh's niece, and not so ragged. In
the intervals of his variegated life he had
watched her growing up, cast off, half
starved, and lonely, till his heart was soft
within him.
Welsh was a kind man when he was
not drunk, but his shack was too con-
venient a place to bestow an incon-
venient child. In front of it stretched
a lake, and close behind it the Long
Swamp, which was not as pretty as it
looked. It was not called a quicksand ;
but it was not crossed, even in winter.
A few Indians had tried it. Persons
having business afterwards on the other
side went round ; and there grew up
about it an ugly tradition with an Indian
name. It looked an innocently sleeping
waste ; but it had its times, which were
not seasons, for waking. In the dead
calm of an August noon the French-
woman's son had seen its bay bushes
sway as with wind, bow, and spring
backwards with the passage of things he
could not see ; had heard out of it the
crying that might have been the crying
of a hurt loon, or the frantic screech of a
man who tries to keep death off him by
shrieking to the living. To a stray trap-
per hearing it meant to wipe the sweat
from his face, if he knew any Indian
words. But the Frenchwoman's son was
a white man determinedly, and had put
away all fear of ghost-calling ; it was
merely a shamefaced care for the child
that sent him to Welsh's to see her after
an absence of a year. He found her a
woman. Also absolutely and astound-
ingly beautiful in an old flannel shirt
Welsh's, and a skirt made of flour sacl
At the sight of her he stood dumb f 01
the first time in his pleasantly irrespor
sible life. Then, as she ran to him ane
put her hands on his, he was suddenly
aware that the spring was scarlet, anc
the whiteness of the pear blossoms th«
whiteness of Mary McManus's face anc
throat above her unspeakable clothes. It
The Frenchwoman's Son.
455
was not till he had spoken about the
priest at Secret Lake that he kissed her.
He was not known by sight in that dis-
trict, so that when he went to McManus
and announced he was going to marry
his daughter it was annoying to be shown
the door — profanely. McManus's mill
happened to burn down the night John
Noel went back to his courting. His
plans were not changed, merely hurried,
but back at Welsh's by the Long Swamp
they bade fair to be destroyed. Mary
McManus had waked to the desire of
clothes.
" But," said he, very tenderly and
without laughter, " I will buy you clothes
for the wedding. Your father says " —
he had never lost his mother's shrug —
" there will be no wedding ; and he says
other things, too."
" You saw Fanny ! " She spoke with-
out looking at him.
" Yes." For once his mind was slow.
" Then," very low, " / 'II have a dress
with roses on it ; and a pair of shoes !
I never had a pair of shoes since I come
here."
" I can buy them." He smiled into
her eyes, but they did not answer him.
" No ; I '11 make him ! I 'm his daugh-
ter; and Fanny has silk dresses."
The Frenchwoman's son sat down on
the spring flowers, and looked across the
nameless color of the Long Swamp.
" Then it will be a long time to the
wedding," he said, softly considering,
" when he takes you home and I have
to steal you out of his house in the dark.
It is spring now, and there are a great
many things to do where I live — in
spring ! There is the loon to watch, — on
her nest." Something in his slow voice
flooded her slim throat scarlet.
" When I cook for you in your house
you shall buy me clothes," she retorted
passionately.
The Frenchwoman's son was not used
to complex emotions. He sat silent, be-
cause he was provoked and grieved and
proud of her all at once. He knew that
the sooner he and she were off to the
priest and the Sou'west the better, for
many reasons. But she was extremely
beautiful, and very white.
" You go 'way and get me some pa-
per," she ordered suddenly, " and I '11
send him in a letter." With his first
word of love to her she had changed from
the little girl who had openly adored him
all her life at Welsh's to a woman who
dominated him body and soul. " You
learned me to write ; I '11 write to him."
" When we 've been to the priest," he
said. calmly; and she flung round on
him.
" I can't — in these," she sobbed. Her
shame had caught her at her heart as she
looked at her rags and her bare legs.
" Why, there 's people, and — I can't.
And Welsh has n't any money, and I
want a — cotton dress — with roses on
it."
The Frenchwoman's son took her in a
strong arm and comforted her with more
confidence in himself than in McManus.
" You shall have the dress with roses
on it. I will bring the paper and you shall
write ; but it will take two days. Will
that do ? "
"What's that?" she said, without
answering. " Don't you hear some one
calling ? " She twisted away from him,
and stood listening.
" No ! " And on the heel of it he did
hear. It was only the old cry he was
used to disbelieving in that floated over
the loneliness, and he laughed. " That ?
It 's only a bird in the swamp ! You 've
often heard it."
" Never that way. There," — every
line of her was rigid, — " it 's coming
again ! It — it sounds like as if it was
calling me. I — oh, I 'm afraid ! "
" There 's no harm in it. Why," —
he moved to her serenely as he remem-
bered, — "I went through the swamp
once, when I was a boy. It's a very
good way to go if you know the path."
" There 's no path ! "
" I know one ; " and over his comfort-
456
The Frenchwoman's Son.
able voice the call came close and mock-
ing.
" Welsh says," she clutched him, whis-
pering, " that 's lost people's ghosts ; and
they only call when they 're hungry ! I
— don't it sound like my name ? " and he
felt the fear in her.
" It 's only a bird," he said softly. " Do
I look as if I were afraid of it ? If it
were your name I would be afraid."
McManus's daughter looked at him,
and at five-and-twenty the Frenchwo-
man's son was a beautiful sight. There
was no half-breed about him except
the straight sling of his walk and the
dark clearness of the cheek bent down to
her ; and there was that in his eyes that
made her safe and happy and miserable
all at once. If she had not caught sight
of her own incredible skirt she would
have clung to him, and begged him to
take her away then and there. But she
had remembered the cotton dress, and
her father's money ; and Fanny in silk.
And perhaps the sudden terror that cut
the quiet air was only a bird ! What he
said was gospel.
" There 's nothing you 'd be afraid of,
except me ! " she said, with the insolence
of a woman to the man she adores. " Get
me the paper an' a pencil."
It was Welsh who took in the letter,
half from honest affection for his niece,
and half for the chance of getting thor-
oughly drunk on some one else's whiskey.
If he did it was not on McManus's.
Mary was no diplomatist, especially in
the written word.
" I take my pen in hand to tel you I
am going to be married to mister Noel if
you don't send me some mony to get a
dress I wil come down to the vilage and
tel how you tret me I wil come in
Welsh's old shirt and the flower sak I
hav for a petticoat that is al the dress I
hav and show them Mary at Welsh's."
Perfectly sober, and a day before his
time, the messenger returned, and sheep-
ishly confronted his niece and Noel.
" He says," he announced sourly,
" that you 're to come home right to once,
and he '11 flour-sack you ! — and his mill 's
burnt down, and the talk is that the
Frenchwoman's son done it. And Fan-
ny 's run off with Jake Perry, and you 'i
to go home to-morrow. And so I gues
you two 'd better git married and gont
and tell him afterwards ; for he won't
give you nothing, and he 's wanting
you home."
" He can want," said McManus'g
daughter blackly. " Did n't he send :
nothing ? "
" Just that word, honey ; and you ain't
but seventeen ; he can git you. I — I
ain't a man to fight," with sudden shrill-
ness, " and that letter made him dump
me right out on the road ! "
She stood up straight and looked at
him. " I '11 never go home, and I '11 have
my clothes ; and I 'm glad his mill 's
burnt, and I love the Frenchwoman's son
for doing it, and I 'm glad Fanny 's run
away ; and I hate dad," she said, as emo-
tionless as though she repeated a lesson.
Noel looked sharply from Welsh
the girl. " What 's that about the Frencl
woman's son ? "
" Some say it was him had a grudge
again McManus. Labrador said so ; he
only said so ; they don't know who done
it. I ain't never seen the man, but he 's
got a hard reputation, and Labrador
thinks it was him. But when I wanted
to know why, he soured on me ; and he
said he 'd kill me if I opened my mout
on it to McManus."
" He certainly would," returned Mr.
Noel placidly ; and having been hand in
glove with Frank Labrador, perhaps he
knew.
" The Frenchwoman's son ain't bad if
Labrador likes him," said Mary unex-
pectedly. " I love him, anyhow ! "
" Yes " — began Noel stupidly, anc
stopped. She did not know any moi
than Welsh did, and perhaps he hac
never realized it before. But it was timt
to get away from the Long Swamp anc
take his wife with him. " I am SOT
The Frenchwoman's Son.
457
about that burning," he observed slowly.
" It was a pity ; and foolish. But he is
not altogether a bad man, the French-
woman's son."
" Well, there 's no handling McManus
till he finds out who burnt his mill ! "
muttered Welsh. He was suddenly tired
of the subject. "He ain't heard of the
Frenchwoman's son, and he ain't likely
to. You git away and git married,
honey ! Noel, he '11 git you a dress."
Mary made no answer ; the French-
woman's son saw there was no handling
her, either. He stood and whistled a
thoughtful tune, and she .swung round
on him.
"Who's the Frenchwoman's son?"
she demanded.
"Just a man." He said it between
two bars of the tune that covered his
thoughts.
" Is he in the village ? "
He shook his head.
" Can dad catch him ? "
The whistle stopped abruptly in a
scornful smile. " Not if he 'd seen him
fire the mill ! "
" Do you think he did it ? "
" Oh yes," carelessly. " But he had
his reasons ! " He looked at her with
amusement. " He has never done things
without his reasons."
" They say he 's a hard-living man,"
Welsh objected casually.
" That 's a lie," slowly. " And if he
was he 's done with it. And catch him " —
he laughed superbly. " When they can
catch the screaming in the swamp ! "
He flung back at it with a free gesture
of his head and shoulders, and McMa-
nus's daughter drew a breath and set
her teeth on it. There could not be in
all the world a man like him ! She would
go with him to the priest in a dress with
roses on it, in spite of her father. She
listened without objecting while he and
Welsh arranged for the wedding in three
days' time, but when she turned away to
the house she sat thinking, instead of
getting supper. Noel had departed to
interview the priest, and, incidentally,
the proprietor of the only shop at Secret
Lake. In three days he would be back
for the wedding ; and the dress with
roses oji it was no nearer. Nothing
would take Welsh back to McManus,
and she had no other messenger. But
when in the white dawn Welsh arose
and unexpectedly went fishing, his niece
leaped from her bed and cast on her cas-
ual garments. Even as his back disap-
peared in the thin spring bushes she was
down at the lake shore, and the last sound
of his going was covered by another
sound : the plunging rush of a canoe
launched and sprung into with one and
the same movement. Frank Labrador,
coming up half an hour later on business
of his own, saw the shack deserted ex-
cept for the blue jays making faces at
him from the roof tree, and went half-
heartedly away.
It was sunrise of the next day when
the girl came back, to find the place
still empty. She was tired, and she went
to sleep, but once and again a horrible
clamor in the swamp roused her till she
went out to listen : when she came back
for the second time she barred the door
uneasily, and dressed herself. Her skin
crept on her as she crouched down by the
window and watched the empty glitter-
ing lake the long, silent morning, wish-
ing impatiently that Welsh would come
back ; if she had had even a dog to speak
to it would have lightened the senseless
dread that was on her. And at the
thought, leaning out and shading her
eyes, she forgot it. A canoe had shot
round the point and was at the landing.
There was one man in it, — a dirty mes-
senger with a parcel.
When she raced down and dragged it
out of his hand she saw her shoes, her
stockings, and her wedding gown. Her
father had been as good as his word,
though he had sent the things by a
stranger, instead of by Labrador as she
had asked him. With a low laugh she
plumped down on her knees and fondled
458
The Frenchwoman^ Son.
the common print with roses on it ; when
she looked up to ask the man who had
brought it if he wanted his dinner, he
had gone away, and in the still air the
rustling from the swamp was loud. For
a moment her chill fear rushed back on
her, but she would not heed it. She was
back at the house, kneeling on the floor,
feverishly putting the scissors into her
wedding gown.
The Frenchwoman's son, coming unex-
pectedly to the door in the late afternoon,
stood thunderstruck. Mary had sprung
to her feet at the sight of him, transfig-
ured; her face a pale flame, her eyes
shining, her triumphant mouth scarlet.
He let fall the things he had painfully
procured for her as he stared.
" I got it ! " she cried, and flung her-
self at him, her arms warm round his
throat; "I made him. I've shoes and
stockings and white cotton and a dress
with roses on it. And it 's nearly done,
and I '11 marry you to-morrow ! "
" How did you get them ? " He
laughed because he was proud of her,
and had never seen her so beautiful.
"Tell me! How?"
" I went down," — simply, — " and
waited at the portage, and sent a boy with
notes on the paper you gave me. I asked
him if he would give me the dress if I told
him who fired his mill, and he sent back
' Yes.' So I told him it was the French-
woman's son, and he sent back to say ' it
was cheap at a cotton gown, and he 'd
send it right away.' And he did. And
you said he could n't catch the French-
woman's son ! "
Life, color, and expression were all
wiped off her listener's face.
" The Frenchwoman's son ! " he re-
peated like a parrot. " But — and you
told him ? " His ready tongue had failed
him.
"You said he could n't catch him,
any more than the ghost-calling in the
swamp." She stood back, a little anx-
ious. " He — he can't, can he ? "
" Not then ! Now " — He took her
with both hands, and held her at his arms'
length, and the feel of his hands fright-
ened her, like the strangeness in his
voice. " Did n't you know Labrador
was here looking for me? That he
found me last night, and told me a man
from Sabean's had seen me when I fooled
over to speak to your father, and told
him it was me you were going to marry ;
me, the Frenchwoman's son ! And
now " — The familiar shrug did not
match the sound in his voice. " Well —
I should have told you. But I could n't
trust Welsh."
" You ain't French." She smiled dis-
dainfully ; but as she saw what was in
his face her legs shook under her, and
she shrieked at him, " Do you mean it ?
Did I do — that?"
" My mother was a Frenchwoman," he
said heavily ; he had no desire to swear,
even to be angry with her ; the thing had
gone too deep. " But I 've been coming
here for so long I forgot you could n't
know." He glanced through the open
door to get the time from the westering
sun, and saw, instead, that the young
scarlet was gone from the world ; it was
old, green, usual, — and the thought made
his voice rough. " Come, we '11 get out
of this ! " If he left her behind he would
lose her, and once at the head waters of
the Sou'west, it would be a better man
than McManus who should lay a claw
on him. But his heart felt numb as he
stooped to gather up the poor finery that
had betrayed him.
As he bent, the girl's miserable eyes
1 fell on the window.
" Keep down," she whispered thickly.
" There 's a boat ! There 's — it 's dad,
and another man ! "
The Frenchwoman's son heard her
without surprise. He did not even glance
out, but as he stepped softly back into
the shadow of the room he looked at her
with a curious trick of the eyes that made
them seem all pupil, and showed the
whites above and below the irids.
"That is the sheriff," he said evenly,
The, Frenchwoman's Son.
459
"with your father. What would you
like me to do ? For I burned the mill
because your father was cruel to you, and
I disliked him." He kept his strange
gaze on her, standing motionless.
McManus's daughter sobbed word-
lessly as she sprang at him and ran him
out the back door.
" There 's the swamp ; you ain't afraid
of it," — anguish and hate had killed her
own terror of the place ; " hide ! What 's
an old mill ? Hide ! "
" You 'd be afraid in it ! " he said un-
easily ; and she laughed fiercely over her
sobbing.
" That would n't make me stay. Hur-
ry ; stoop down ! "
There was dead silence abroad now.
Through it the two slipped safely across
Welsh's inadequate clearing, into the
thin green of its fringe of alders ; and
between them and the heavy screen of
the swamp maples something moved.
It was the man from Sabean's, the dirty
messenger of the morning; and the
Frenchwoman's son cut off his shout in
the middle. But the half cry had done
it McManus was hot foot round the
house with the sheriff after him, and
Noel was dragging the girl through the
binding maples, down into the bay bushes
that stretched breast-high between green
abysses and runnels of fathomless black
water. When they reached his path
they could drop and lie hidden, for not
a man would dare follow them ; but for
now they must be cat-footed over the
deadly green that spurted to their every
step. There was cover enough, and he
put her behind him, without daring to
take his eyes from the quaking ground
under his feet.
"Walk in my steps," he ordered,
wondering if the next few yards would
bear them ; and his heart stopped as she
screamed, —
" My dress — my dress with roses on
it! " Even as he wheeled to clutch her
she had broken away from him and was
running, leaping helter-skelter back to
the house, with no heed to the careful
way she had come.
The Frenchwoman's son stood up
straight in the afternoon light, his black
head a clear mark against the young
sun-filtered green of the thicket he was
making for.
" Lie down ! " he yelled, " lie down ! "
He did not hear any answer. It was
McManus who had fired, and the sheriff,
who was half-hearted about the whole
business, had been slow in knocking up
his gun. Mary McManus had lain down
in a very pretty patch of quaking grass.
The Frenchwoman's son knew she was
dead as she crumpled forwards, but he
was a white man who had been going to
marry a white girl. He went back for
her. He was heedless of the sheriff's
calling ; he knew a path through the
swamp, and he must carry her to it that
he might bury her out in the clean ground
of the Sou'west. But the weight across
his shoulder had somehow confused him ;
and the dead girl's hair kept brushing
over his eyes, so that in the waving shad-
ow of it he saw another shadow moving
before him. To the dull anguish of his
haste the very bushes were malignant ;
they kept him back, springing in his face
with blow after blow, as though he fol-
lowed too close a trail. But he was a
white man, and he fought through them,
making blindly for the sinking sun. It
was on the edge of a bottomless black
channel that he stumbled, and fell.
No sound came back out of the swamp ;
that which had been unquiet was perhaps
fed ; but in Welsh's house a light air
crept through the open back door and
fluttered the dress with roses on it that
lay half made on the floor.
S* Carleton.
460
An American Primer.
AN AMERICAN PRIMER.1
[The American Primer is a challenge rather than a finished fight. Whitman shows in it what
he was prepared to do rather than what he thought he had perfected. It was his original inten-
tion to enlarge these notes into a study which would in a sense inclose the theme and dignify it
in the way it deserved. Whitman in his early career planned for all sorts of literary ventures
which were not consummated. Whitman was undoubtedly convinced that he had a mission.
This conviction never assumed fanatic forms. Whitman was the most catholic man who ever
thought he had a mission. But he did regard himself as such a depository. Yet he never be-
lieved or contended that he possessed exclusive powers or an extraordinary divination. He felt
that if the message with which he was entrusted did not get out through him it would get out
through some other. But in his earlier career, after he tired of writing in the formal way and
to the formal effect, — for he played the usual juvenile part in literary experiment, — he felt thi
it would be difficult, if not impossible, to secure publishers either for his detail work or for
books. He often asked himself, How am I to deliver my goods ? He once decided that
would lecture. And he told me that when the idea of the American Primer originally came
him it was for a lecture. He wrote at this thing in the early fifties, — even as far along as 1856-57.
And there is evidence that he made brief additions to it from time to time in the ten years tl
followed. But after 1855, when he succeeded in issuing the first edition of Leaves of Grass,
some of his old plans were abandoned, — this lecture scheme with others, — and certain new plans
were formulated. The Primer was thenceforth, as a distinct project, held in abeyance. I re-
member that once in the late eighties he laughed and said to me, " I may yet bring the Primer
out." And when I laughed incredulously he added, " Well, I guess you are right to laugh : I
suppose I never shall. And the best of the Primer stuff has no doubt leaked into my other
work." It is indeed true that Whitman gave expression to the substance of the Primer in one
way or another. Even some of its sentences are utilized here and there in his prose and verse
volumes. But the momentum gathered and brought to bear upon the subject in the manuscript
now under view was nowhere else repeated. The Primer, therefore, has, as a part of Whitman's
serious literary product, a marked identity. Whitman said of it, " It was first intended for a
lecture : then when I gave up the idea of lecturing it was intended for a book : now, as it stands,
it is neither a lecture nor a book." — HORACE TRAUBEL.]
MUCH is said of what is spiritual, and rude. As humanity is one under its amaz-
spirituality, in this, that, or the other, —
in objects, expressions. For me, I see no
object, no expression, no animal, no tree,
no art, no book, but I see, from morn-
ing to night, and from night to morn-
ing, the spiritual. Bodies are all spirit-
ual. All words are spiritual — nothing
is more spiritual than words. Whence
are they ? Along how many thousands
and tens of thousands of years have they
come ? — those eluding, fluid, beautiful,
fleshless realities, Mother, Father, Wa-
ter, Earth, Me, This, Soul, Tongue,
House, Fire.
A great observation will detect same-
ness through all languages, however old,
however new, however polished, however
1 As an alternate to his adopted headline I
find this among Whitman's memoranda : " The
Primer of Words : For American Young Men
ing diversities, language is one under its.
The flippant read on some long past age,
wonder at its dead costumes [customs ?],
its amusements, &c. ; but the master un-
derstands well the old, ever-new, ever-
common grounds, below those anil
growths, and, between any two ages,
two languages and two humanities, how-
ever wide apart in time and space, marks
well not the superficial shades of diffei
ence, but the mass shades of a joint na-
ture.
In a little while, in the United Si
the English language, enriched with coi
tributions from all languages, old an<
new, will be spoken by a hundred mi]
lions of people : perhaps a hundred thoi
and Women, For Literati, Orators, Teacher
Musicians, Judges, Presidents, &c." — H. T.
Copyright, 1904, by HORACE TKAUBEL.
An American Primer.
461
sand words (" seventy or eighty thousand
words " — Noah Webster).
The Americans are going to be the
most fluent and melodious voiced people
in the world — and the most perfect
users of words. Words follow character,
— nativity, independence, individuality.
I see that the time is nigh when the
etiquette of salons is to be discharged
from that great thing, the renovated Eng-
lish speech in America. The occasions
of the English speech in America are
immense, profound — stretch over ten
thousand vast cities, over through thou-
sands of years, millions of miles of mead-
ows, farms, mountains, men. The occa-
sions of salons are for a coterie, a bon
soir or two — involve waiters standing
behind chairs, silent, obedient, with backs
that can bend and must often bend.
What beauty there is in words ! What
a lurking curious charm in the sound of
some words ! Then voices ! Five or six
times in a lifetime (perhaps not so often)
you have heard from men and women
such voices, as they spoke the most com-
mon word ! What can it be that from
those few men and women made so much
out of the most common word ! Geogra-
phy, shipping, steam, the mint, the elec-
tric telegraph, railroads, and so forth,
have many strong and beautiful words.
Mines — iron works — the sugar planta-
tions of Louisiana — the cotton crop and
the rice crop — Illinois wheat — Ohio
corn and pork — Maine lumber — all
these sprout in hundreds and hundreds
of words, all tangible and clean-lived, all
having texture and beauty.
To all thoughts of your or any one's
mind, — to all yearnings, passions, love,
hate, ennui, madness, desperation of men
for women, and of women for men, — to
all charging and surcharging, — that head
which poises itself on your neck and is
electric in the body beneath your head,
or runs with the blood through your
veins, or in those curious incredible mira-
cles you call eyesight or hearing, — to all
these, and the like of these, have been
made words. Such are the words that
are never new and never old.
What a history is folded, folded inward
and inward again, in the single word I.
The words of the Body ! The words
of Parentage ! The words of Husband
and Wife. The words of Offspring !
The word Mother ! The word Father !
The words of Behavior are quite nu-
merous. They follow the law ; they are
courteous, grave, have polish, have a
sound of presence, and abash all furni-
ture and shallowness out of their sight.
The words of maternity are all the
words that were ever spoken by the mouth
of man, the child of woman, — but they
are reborn words, and the mouth of the
full-sized mother, daughter, wife, amie,
does not offend by using any one of them.
Medicine has hundreds of useful and
characteristic words — new means of cure
— new schools of doctors — the wonder-
ful anatomy of the body — the names of
a thousand diseases — surgeon's terms
— hydropathy — all that relates to the
great organs of the body. The medical
art is always grand — nothing affords a
nobler scope for superior men and wo-
men. It, of course, will never cease to
be near man, and add new terms.
Law, Medicine, Religion, the Army,
the personnel of the Army and Navy,
the Arts, stand on their old stock of
words, without increase. In the law is
to be noticed a growing impatience with
formulas, and with diffuseness, and ven-
erable slang. The personnel of the
Army and the Navy exists in America,
apart from the throbbing life of America,
— an exile in the land, foreign to the in-
stincts and tastes of the people, and, of
course, soon in due time to give place
to something native, something warmed
with throbs of our own life.
These States are rapidl}r supplying
themselves with new words, called for by
new occasions, new facts, new politics,
new combinations. Far plentier addi-
tions will be needed, and, of course, will
be supplied.
462
An American Primer.
Because it is a truth that the words
continually used among the people are,
in numberless cases, not the words used
in writing, or recorded in the dictionaries
by authority, there are just as many
words in daily use, not inscribed in the
dictionary, and seldom or never in any
print. Also, the forms of grammar are
never persistently obeyed, and cannot be.
The Real Dictionary will give all the
words that exist in use, the bad words as
well as any. The Real Grammar will
be that which declares itself a nucleus
of the spirit of the laws, with liberty to
all to carry out the spirit of the laws,
even by violating them, if necessary.
The English Language is grandly law-
less like the race who use it, — or, rather,
breaks out of the little laws to enter
truly the higher ones. It is so instinct
with that which underlies laws and the
purports of laws it refuses all petty in-
terruptions in its way.
Books themselves have their peculiar
words, — namely, those that are never
used in living speech in the real world,
but only used in the world of books.
Nobody ever actually talks as books and
plays talk.
The Morning has its words and the
Evening has its words. How much there
is in the word Light ! How vast, sur-
rounding, falling, sleepy, noiseless, is the
word Night ! It hugs with unf elt yet
living arms.
Character makes words. The Eng-
lish stock, full enough of faults, but averse
to all folderol, equable, instinctively just,
latent with pride and melancholy, ready
with brawned arms, with free speech,
with the knife-blade for tyrants and the
reached hand for slaves — have put all
these in words. We have them in
America, — they are the body of the
whole of the past. We are to justify our
inheritance, — we are to pass it on to
those who are to come after us, a thou-
sand years hence, as we have grown out
of the English of a thousand years ago :
American geography — the plenteous-
ness and variety of the great nations of
the Union — the thousands of settlements
— the seacoast — the Canadian North
— the Mexican South — California and
Oregon — the inland seas — the moun-
tains — Arizona — the prairies — the
immense rivers.
Many of the slang words among fight-
ing men, gamblers, thieves, prostitutes,
are powerful words. These words ought
to be collected, — the bad words as well
as the good. Many of these bad words
are fine.
Music has many good words, now
technical, but of such rich and juicy
character that they ought to be taken for
common use in writing and speaking.
New forms of science, newer, freer
characters, may have something in them
to need new words. One beauty of
words is exactitude. To me each word
out of the that now compose the
English language, has its own meaning,
and does not stand for anything but it-
self — and there are no two words the
same any more than there are two per-
sons the same.
Much of America is shown in its
newspaper names, and in the names of
its steamboats, ships, — names of char-
acteristic amusements and games.
What do you think words are ? Do
you think words are positive and original
things in themselves ? No. Words are
not original and arbitrary in themselves.
Words are a result — they are the pro-
geny of what has been or is in vogue. If
iron architecture comes in vogue, as it
seems to be coming, words are wanted
to stand for all about iron architecture,
for the work it causes, for the different
branches of work and of the workman —
those blocks of buildings, seven storie
high, with light, strong facades, and gird-
ers that will not crumble a mite in a thoi
sand years.
Also words to describe all America
peculiarities, — the splendid and rugge
characters that are forming among the
states, or are already formed — in
An American Primer.
463
cities, the firemen of Mannahatta, and the
target excursionist and Bowery boy — the
Boston truckman — the Philadelphian.
In America an immense number of
new words are needed to embody the
new political facts, the compact of the
Declaration of Independence, and of the
Constitution — the union of the States
— the new States — the Congress — the
modes of election — the stump speech —
the ways of electioneering — addressing
the people — stating all that is to be said
in modes that fit the life and experience
of the Indianian, the Michiganian, the
Vermonter, the men of Maine. Also
words to answer the modern, rapidly
spreading faith of the vital equality of
women with men, and that they are to
be placed on an exact plane, political-
ly, socially, and in business, with men.
Words are wanted to supply the copious
trains of facts, and flanges of facts, argu-
ments, and adjectival facts, growing out
of all new knowledges. (Phrenology.)
Drinking brandy, gin, beer, is gener-
' ally fatal to the perfection of the voice ;
meanness of mind the same ; gluttony in
eating of course the same ; a thinned
habit of body, or a rank habit of body
rots the voice. . . . The great Italian
singers are above all others in the world
from causes quite the same as those that
make the voices of native healthy sub-
strata of Mannahatta young men, espe-
cially the drivers of horses, and all whose
work leads to free loud calling and com-
manding, have such a ring and freshness.
Pronunciation of Yankees is nasal and
offensive — it has the flat tones. It could
probably be changed by placing only
those teachers in schools who have rich
ripe voices — and by the children practi-
cing to speak from the chest and in the
guttural and baritone methods. All sorts
of physical, moral, and mental deformi-
ties are inevitably returned in the voice.
The races that in their realities are sup-
ple, obedient, cringing, have hundreds of
words to express hundreds of forms of
acts, thoughts, flanges, of those realities,
which the English language knows no-
thing of.
The English tongue is full of strong
words native or adopted to express the
blood-born passion of the race for rude-
ness and resistance, as against polish and
all acts to give in : Robust, brawny, ath-
letic, muscular, acrid, harsh, rugged, se-
vere, pluck, grit, effrontery, stern, resist-
ance, bracing, rude, rugged, rough, shag-
gy, bearded, arrogant, haughty. These
words are alive and sinewy, — they walk,
look, step, with an air of command. They
will often lead the rest, — they will not
follow. How can they follow? They
will appear strange in company unlike
themselves.
English words. Even people's names
were spelt by themselves, sometimes one
way, sometimes another. Public neces-
sity remedies all troubles. Now, in the
80th year of these States, there is a little
diversity in the ways of spelling words,
and much diversity in the ways of pro-
nouncing them. Steamships, railroads,
newspapers, submarine telegraphs, will
probably bring them in. If not, it is not
important.
So in the accents and inflections of
words. Language must cohere — it can-
not be left loosely to float or to fly away.
Yet all the rules of the accents of and
inflections of words drop before a per-
fect voice — that may follow the rules or
be ignorant of them — it is indifferent
which. Pronunciation is the stamina of
language, — it is language. The noblest
pronunciation, in a city or race, marks
the noblest city or race, or descendants
thereof.
Why are names (words) so mighty ?
Because facts, ancestry, maternity, faiths,
are. Slowly, eternally, inevitably, move
the souls of the earth, and names (words)
are its (their) signs.
Kosmos words, words of the free ex-
pansion of thought, history, chronology,
literature, are showing themselves, with
foreheads, muscular necks and breasts.
These gladden me. I put my arms
464
An American Primer.
around them — touch my lips to theirs.
The past hundred centuries have confided
much to me, yet they mock me, frown-
ing. I think I am done with many of
the words of the past hundred centuries.
I am mad that their poems, bibles, words,
still rule and represent the earth, and are
not yet superseded. But why do I say
so ? I must not, will not, be impatient.
The American city excursions, for
military practice, for firing at the target,
for all the exercises of health and man-
hood, — why should not women accom-
pany them ? I expect to see the time in
Politics, Business, Public Gatherings,
Processions, Excitements, when women
shall not be divided from men, but shall
take their part on the same terms as men.
What sort of women have Massachusetts,
Ohio, Virginia, Pennsylvania, and the
rest, correspondent with what they con-
tinually want. Sometimes I have fancied
that only from superior, hardy women
can rise the future superiorities of these
States.
Man's words, for the young men of
these States, are all words that have
arisen out of the qualities of mastership,
going first, brunting danger first, —
words to identify a hardy boyhood —
knowledge — an erect, sweet, lusty body,
without taint — choice and chary of its
love-power.
The spelling of words is subordinate.
Morbidness for nice spelling and tenaci-
ty for or against some one letter or so
means dandyism and impotence in litera-
ture. Of course the great writers must
have digested all these things, — passed
lexicons, etymologies, orthographies,
through them and extracted the nutri-
ment. Modern taste is for brevity and
for ranging words in spelling classes.
Probably the words of the English tongue
can never be ranged in spelling classes.
The phonetic (?) spelling is on natural
principles — it has arbitrary forms of
letters and combinations of letters for all
sounds. It may in time prevail, — it
surely will prevail if it is best it should.
For many hundred years there was no-
thing like settled spelling.
A perfect user of words uses things
— they exude in power and beauty from
him — miracles from his hands — mira-
cles from his mouth — lilies, clouds, sun-
shine, woman, poured copiously — things
whirled like chain-shot rocks, defiance,
compulsion, horses, iron, locomotives, the
oak, the pine, the keen eye, the hairy
breast, the Texan ranger, the Boston
truckman, the woman that arouses a man,
the man that arouses a woman.
Tavern words, such as have reference
to drinking, or the compliments of those
who drink, — the names of some three
hundred different tavern drinks in one
part or another of these States.
Words of all degrees of dislike, from
just a tinge, onward or deepward.
Words of approval, admiration, friend-
ship. This is to be said among the young
men of these States, that with a wonder-
ful tenacity of friendship, and passionate
fondness for their friends, and always a
manly readiness to make friends, they
yet have remarkably few words of names
for the friendly sentiments. They seer
to be words that do not thrive here among
the muscular classes, where the real qual-
ity of friendship is always truly to
found. Also, they are words which the
muscular classes, the young men of these
States, rarely use and have an aversion
for ; they never give words to their most
ardent friendships.
Words of politics are numerous in these
States, and many of them peculiar. The
Western States have terms of their own :
the President's message — the political
meeting — the committees — the reso-
lutions : new vegetables — new trees —
new animals.
If success and breed follow camels
and dromedaries, that are now just in-
troduced into Texas, to be used for trave
and traffic over the vast wilds between
the lower Mississippi and the Pacific,
number of new words will also have
be tried after them.
An American Primer.
465
The appetite of the people of these
States, in popular speeches and writings,
is for unhemmed latitude, coarseness,
directness, live epithets, expletives, words
of opprobrium, resistance. This I un-
derstand because I have the taste myself
as large, as largely, as any one. I have
pleasure in the use, on fit occasions, of
— traitor, coward, liar, shyster, skulk,
doughface, trickster, mean cuss, back-
slider, thief, impotent, lickspittle.
The great writers are often select of
their audiences. The greatest writers
only are well pleased and at their ease
among the unlearned, — are received by
common men and women familiarly, do
not hold out obscure, but come welcome
to table, bed, leisure, by day and night.
A perfect writer would make words
sing, dance, kiss, bear children, weep,
bleed, rage, stab, steal, fire cannon, steer
ships, sack cities, charge with cavalry or
infantry, or do anything that man or
woman or the natural powers can do.
Latent, in a great user of words, must
actually be all passions, crimes, trades,
animals, stars, God, sex, the past, might,
space, metals, and the like — because
these are the words, and he who is not
these plays with a foreign tongue, turn-
ing helplessly to dictionaries and author-
ities. How can I tell you ? I put many
things on record that you will not under-
stand at first, — perhaps not in a year, —
but they must be (are to be) understood.
The earth, I see, writes with prodigal
clear hands all summer, forever, and all
winter also, content, and certain to be
understood in time. Doubtless, only the
greatest user of words himself fully en-
joys and understands himself.
Words of names of places are strong,
copious, unruly, in the repertoire for the
American pens and tongues. The names
of these States — the names of Coun-
tries, Cities, Rivers, Mountains, Villages,
Neighborhoods — borrowed plentifully
1 Whitman here inserts a memorandum, a
sort of self -query, to this effect : " A few char-
acteristic words — words give us to see — (list
VOL. xcin. — NO. 558. 30
from each of the languages that graft the
English language — or named from some
natural peculiarity of water or earth, or
some event that happened there — often
named from death, from some animal,
from some of those subtle analogies that
the common people are so quick to per-
ceive. The names in the list of the Post
Offices of these States are studies.
What name a city has — what name a
State, river, sea, mountain, wood, prairie,
has — is no indifferent matter. All abo-
riginal names sound good. I was asking
for something savage and luxuriant, and
behold, here are the aboriginal names.
I see how they are being preserved.
They are honest words, — they give the
true length, breadth, depth. They all
fit. Mississippi ! — the word winds with
chutes — it rolls a stream three thousand
miles long. Ohio, Connecticut, Ottawa,
Monongahela, all fit.
Names are magic. One word can pour
such a flood through the soul. To-day I
will mention Christ's before all other
names. Grand words of names are still
left. What is it that flows through me
at the sight of the word Socrates, or
Cincinnatus, or Alfred of the olden time
— or at the sight of the word Columbus,
or Shakespeare, or Rousseau, or Mira-
beau - — or at the sight of the word
Washington, or Jefferson, or Emerson ?
Out of Christ are divine words — out
of this savior. Some words are fresh
smelling, like lilies, roses, to the soul,
blooming without failure. The name of
Christ — all words that have arisen from
the life and death of Christ, the divine
son, who went* about speaking perfect
words, no patois — whose life was per-
fect, — the touch of whose hands and feet
was miracles, — who was crucified, —
his flesh laid in a shroud, in the grave.1
Words of names of persons, thus far,
still return the old continents and races
— return the past three thousand years —
of poets — Hindoo — Homer — Shakespeare —
Pythagoras, Plato, Zoroaster, Menu, Socrates,
Sesostris, Christ). Improve this." — H. T.
466
An American Primer.
perhaps twenty thousand — return the
Hebrew Bible, Greece, Rome, France,
the Goths, the Celts, Scandinavia, Ger-
many, England. Still questions come :
what flanges are practicable for names of
persons that mean these States ? What
is there in the best aboriginal names?
What is there in strong words of quali-
ties, bodily, mental, — a name given to
the cleanest and most beautiful body, ot-
to the offspring of the same ? What is
there that will conform to the genius of
these States, and to all the facts ? What
escape with perfect freedom, without af-
fectation, from the shoals of Johns, Pe-
ters, Davids, Marys ? Or on what happy
principle, popular and fluent, could other
words be prefixed or suffixed to these, to
make them show who they are, what
land they were born in. what govern-
ment, which of the States, what genius,
mark, blood, times, have coined them
with strong-cut coinage ?
The subtle charm of beautiful pronun-
ciation is not in dictionaries, grammars,
marks of accent, formulas of a language,
or in any laws or rules. The charm of
the beautiful pronunciation of all words,
of all tongues, is in perfect flexible vocal
organs, and in a developed harmonious
soul. All words, spoken from these,
have deeper, sweeter sounds, new mean-
ings, impossible on any less terms. Such
meanings, such sounds, continually wait
in every word that exists — in these
words — perhaps slumbering through
years, closed from all tympana of tem-
ples, lips, brains, until that comes which
has the quality patiently waiting in the
words. . . . Likely there are other words
wanted. Of words wanted, the matter
is summed up in this : When the time
comes for them to represent anything or
any state of things, the words will surely
follow. The lack of any words, I say
again, is as historical as the existence of
words. As for me, I feel a hundred re-
alities, clearly determined in me, that
words are not yet formed to represent.
Men like me — also women, our counter-
parts — perfectly equal — will gradually
get to be more and more numerous, —
perhaps swiftly, in shoals ; then the words
will also follow, in shoals. It is the glory
and superb rose-hue of the English lan-
guage, anywhere, that it favors growth
as the skin does, — that it can soon be-
come, whenever that is needed, the tough
skin of a superior man or woman.
The art of the use of words would
a stain, a smutch, but for the stami
of things. For in manners, poems, or
tions, music, friendship, authorship, w
is not said is just as important as w
is said, and holds just as much meanin
Fond of men, as a living woman is
fond of women, as a living man is.
I like limber, lasting, fierce words. I
like them applied to myself, — and I like
them in newspapers, courts, debates, con-
gress. Do you suppose the liberties and
the brawn of these States have to do only
with delicate lady-words ? with gloved
gentlemen words ? Bad Presidents, bad
judges, bad clients, bad editors, owners
of slaves, and the long ranks of Nor
era political suckers (robbers, traito:
suborned), monopolists, infidels, . .
shaved persons, supplejacks, ecclesi
tics, men not fond of women, women i*
fond of men, cry down the use of stron
cutting, beautiful, rude words. To t
manly instincts of the People they
forever be welcome.
In words of names, the mouth and
of the people show an antipathy to titl
misters, handles. They love short fi
names abbreviated to their lips: To
Bill, Jack. These are to enter into
erature, and be voted for on politi
tickets for the great offices : Expletiv>
. . . curious words and phrases of
sent or inquiry, nicknames either to p
sons or customs. Many actions, ma
kinds of character, and many of the
fashions of dress have names among two
thirds of the people, that would never be
understood among the remaining third,
and never appear in print.
Factories, mills, and all the processes
An American Primer.
467
of hundreds of different manufacturers
grow thousands of words. Cotton, wool-
len, and silk goods, — hemp, rope, car-
pets, paper - hangings, paints, roofing
preparations, hardware, furniture, pa-
per mills, the printing offices with their
wonderful improvements, engraving, da-
guerreotyping.
This is the age of the metal iron. Iron,
with all that it does, or that belongs to
iron, or flanges from it, results in words :
from the mines they have been drawn, as
the ore has been drawn. Following the
universal laws of words, these are welded
together in hardy forms and characters.
They are ponderous, strong, definite, not
indebted to the antique, — they are iron
words, wrought and cast. I see them all
good, faithful, massive, permanent words,
— I love well these iron words of 1856.
Coal has its words also, that assimilate
very much with those of iron.
Gold, of course, has always its words.
The mint, the American coinage, the
dollar piece, the fifty dollar or one hun-
dred dollar piece. California, the me-
tallic basis of banking, chemical tests of
gold, — all these have their words: Can-
ada words, Yankee words, Mannahatta
words, Virginia words, Florida and Ala-
bama words, Texas words, Mexican and
Nicaraguan words, Ohio, Illinois, and In-
diana words.
The different mechanics have differ-
ent words, — all, however, under a few
great over-arching laws. These are car-
penter's words, mason's words, black-
smith's words, shoemaker's words, tailor's
words, hatter's words, weaver's words,
painter's words.
The farmer's words are immense.
They are mostly old, partake of ripeness,
home, the ground, — have nutriment, like
wheat and milk. Farm words are added
to, now, by a new class of words, from
the introduction of chemistry into farm-
ing, and from the introduction of numer-
ous machines into the barn and field.
The nigger dialect furnishes hundreds
of outre* words, many of them adopted
into the common speech of the masses of
the people. Curiously, these words show
the old English instinct for wide open
pronunciations, as yallah for yellow, —
massah for master, — and for rounding
off all the corners of words. The nigger
dialect has hints of the future theory of
the modification of all the words of the
English language, for musical purposes,
for a native grand opera in America,
leaving the words just as they are for
writing and speaking, but the same
words so modified as to answer per-
fectly for musical purposes, on grand
and simple principles. Then we should
have two sets of words, male and female
as they should be, in these States, both
equally understood by the people, giving
a fit, much-needed medium to that pas-
sion for music which is deeper and purer
in America than in any other land in the
world. The music of America is to adopt
the Italian method, and expand it to
vaster, simpler, far superber effects. It is
not to be satisfied till it comprehends the
people and is comprehended by them.
Sea words, coast words, sloop words,
sailor's and boatman's words, words of
ships, are numerous in America. One
fourth of the people of these States are
aquatic, — love the water, love to be near
it, smell it, sail on it, swim in it, fish,
clam, trade to and fro upon it. To be
much on the water, or in constant sight
of it, affects words, the voice, the pas-
sions. Around the markets, among the
fish-smacks, along the wharves, you hear
a thousand words, never yet printed in
the repertoire of any lexicon, — words,
strong words solid as logs, and more beau-
ty to me than any of the antique. . . .
In most instances a characteristic word
once used in a poem, speech, or what
not, is then exhausted ; he who thinks
he is going to produce effects by freely
using strong words is ignorant of words.
One single name belongs to one single
place only, — as a keyword of a book
may be best used only once in the book.
A true composition in words returns the
468
An American Primer.
human body, male or female, — that is
the most pei'fect composition, and shall
be best beloved by men and women, and
shall last the longest, which slights no
part of the body, and repeats no part of
the body. To make a perfect composi-
tion in words is more than to make the
best building or machine, or the best
statue or picture. It shall be the glory
of the greatest masters to make perfect
compositions in words.
The plays of Shakespeare and the
rest are grand. Our obligations to them
are incalculable. Other facts remain to
be considered : their foreignness to us
in much of their spirit — the sentiment
under which they were written, that caste
is not to be questioned — that the noble-
man is of one blood and the people of
another.
Costumes are retrospective, — they rise
out of the sub-strata of education, equal-
ity, ignorance, caste, and the like. A
nation that imports its costumes imports
deformity. Shall one man be afraid, or
one woman be afraid, to dress in a beau-
tiful, decorous, natural, wholesome, inex-
pensive manner, because many thousands
dress in the reverse manner? There is
this, also, about costumes, — many save
themselves from being exiled, and keep
each other in countenance, by being alike
foolish, dapper, extravagant. I see that
the day is to come very soon in America
when there will not be a flat level of
costumes.
Probably there is this to be said about
the Anglo-Saxon breed, — that in real
vocal use it has less of the words of the
various phases of friendship and love
than any other race, and more friend-
ship and love. The literature, so full of
love, is begotten of the old Celtic met-
rical romances, and of the extravagant
lays of those who sang and narrated, in
France, and thence in England, — and
of Italian extravaganzas, — and all that
sighing, vowing, kissing, dying, that was
in songs in European literature in the
sixteenth century. Still, it seems as if
this love sickness engrafted on our lite:
ature were only a fair response and ei
joyment that people nourish themselvi
with, after repressing their words. T]
Americans, like the English, probabb
make love worse than any other raci
Voices follow character, and nothing
better than a superb vocalism. I think
this land is covered with the weeds and
chaff of literature.
California is sown thick with
names of all the little and big sainl
Chase them away and substitute aboi
ginal names. What is the fitness
what the strange charm — of aborigini
names ? Monongahela : it rolls with ven-
ison richness upon the palate. Among
names to be revolutionized : that of the
city of " Baltimore."
Never will I allude to the English
Language or tongue without exultation.
This is the tongue that spurns laws, as
the greatest tongue must. It is the most
capacious vital tongue of all, — full
of ease, definiteness, and power, — full
of sustenance, — an enormous treasure
house, or ranges of treasure houses, ar-
senals, granary, chock full of so many
contributions from the north and from
the south, from Scandinavia, from
Greece and Rome — from Spaniards,
Italians, and the French — that its own
sturdy home-dated Angles-bred words
have long been outnumbered by the
foreigners whom they lead — which is
all good enough, and indeed must be.
America owes immeasurable respect and
love to the past, and to many ancestries,
for many inheritances, — but of all that
America has received from the past,
from the mothers and fathers of laws,
arts, letters, etc., by far the greatest
inheritance is the English Language —
so long in growing — so fitted.
All the greatness of any laud, at any
time, lies folded in its names. Would I
recall some particular country or age ?
the most ancient ? the greatest ? I recall
a few names — a mountain or sierra of
mountains — a sea or bay — a river —
An American Primer.
469
some mighty city — some deed of per-
sons, friends or enemies, — some event,
perhaps a great war, perhaps a greater
peace — some time-marking and place-
marking philosoph, divine person, king,
bard, goddess, captain, discoverer, or the
like. Thus does history in all things hang
around a few names. Thus does all hu-
man interest hang around names. All
men experience it, but no man ciphers it
out.
What is the curious rapport of names ?
I have been informed that there are peo-
ple who say it is not important about
names, — one word is as good as another
if the designation be understood. I say
that nothing is more important than
names. Is art important ? Are forms ?
Great clusters of nomenclature in a land
(needed in American nomenclature) in-
clude appropriate names for the months
(those now used perpetuate old myths) ;
appropriate names for the days of the
week (those now used perpetuate Teu-
tonic and Greek divinities) ; appropriate
names for persons American — men, wo-
men, and children ; appropriate names
for American places, cities, rivers, coun-
ties, etc. The word " country " itself
should be changed. Numbering the
streets, as a general thing, with a few
irresistible exceptions, is very good. No
country can have its own poems without
it have its own names. The name of
Niagara should be substituted for the St.
Lawrence. Among the places that stand
in need of fresh appropriate names are
the great cities of St. Louis, New Or-
leans, St. Paul.
The whole theory and practice of the
naming of college societies must be re-
made on superior American principles.
The old theory and practice of classical
education is to give way, and a new race
of teachers is to appear. I say we have
here, now, a greater age to celebrate,
greater ideas to embody, than anything
even in Greece or Rome, or in the names
of Jupiters, Jehovahs, Apollos, and their
myths. The great proper names used
in America must commemorate things
belonging to America and dating thence.
Because, what is America for ? To
commemorate the old myths and the
gods ? To repeat the Mediterranean
here ? Or the uses and growths of Eu-
rope here? No (na-o-o), but to destroy
all those from the purposes of the earth,
and to erect a new earth in their place.
All lies folded in names. I have
heard it said that when the spirit arises
that does not brook submission and imi-
tation, it will throw off the ultramarine
names. That Spirit already walks the
streets of the cities of these States. I,
and others, illustrate it. I say that
America, too, shall be commemorated,
— shall stand rooted in the ground in
names, — and shall flow in the water in
names, and be diffused in time, in days,
in months, in their names. Now the
days signify extinct gods and goddesses,
— the months half-unknown rites and em-
perors, — and chronology with the rest is
all foreign to America, — all exiles and
insults here.
But it is no small thing, — no quick
growth ; not a matter of ruling out one
word and of writing another. Real names
never come so easily. The greatest cities,
the greatest politics, the greatest physio-
logy and soul, the greatest orators, poets,
and literati, — the best women, the freest
leading men, the proudest national char-
acter, — such, and the like, are indis-
pensable beforehand. Then the greatest
names will follow, for they are results, —
and there are no greater results in the
world.
Names are the turning point of who
shall be master. There is so much virtue
in names that a nation which produces its
own names, haughtily adheres to them,
and subordinates others to them, leads
all the rest of the nations of the earth.
I also promulge that a nation which has
not its own names, but begs them of
other nations, has no identity, marches
not in front, but behind.
Names are a test of the aesthetic and
470
Life's Tavern.
of spirituality. A delicate subtle some-
thing there is in the right name — an
undemonstrable nourishment — that ex-
hilarates the soul. Masses of men, un-
aware what they like, lazily inquire what
difference there is between one name and
another. But the few fine ears of the
world decide for them, — the masses be-
ing always as eligible as any whether
they know it or not. All that immense
volumes, and more than volumes, can
tell, is conveyed in the right name. The
right name of a city, State, town, man,
or woman, is a perpetual feast to the aes-
thetic and musical nature. Take the
names of newspapers. What has such
a name as The -iEgis, The Mercury,
The Herald, to do in America ?
Californian, Texan, New Mexican,
and Arizonian names have the sense of
the ecstatic monk, the cloister, the idea
of miracles, and of devotees canonized
after death. They are the results of the
early missionaries and the element of
piety in the old Spanish character. They
have, in the same connection, a tinge
of melancholy and of a curious free-
dom from roughness and money-making.
Such names stand strangely in Califor-
nia. What do such names know of
democracy, — of the hunt for the gold
leads and the nugget, or of the religion
that is scorn and negation ?
American writers are to show far more
freedom in the use of words. Ten thou-
sand native idiomatic words are grow-
ing, or are to-day already grown, out
of which vast numbers could be used
by American writers, with meaning and
effect, — words that would be welcomed
by the nation, being of the national
blood, — words that would give that taste
of identity and locality which is so dear
in literature.
Walt Whitman.
LIFE'S TAVERN.
IN this old Tavern there are rooms so dear
That I would linger here.
I love these corners and familiar nooks
Where I have sat with people and with books;
The very imperfections and the scars
About the walls and ceiling and the floor,
The sagging of the windows and the door,
The dinginess that mars
The hearth and chimney, and the wood laid bare
There on the old black* chair.
The dear dilapidation of the place
Smiles in my face,
And I am loath to go.
Here from the window is a glimpse of sea,
Enough for me ;
And every evening, through the window bars,
Peer in the friendly stars.
— And yet I know
That some day I must go, and close the door,
And see the House no more.
Mary Burt Messer.
The Sicilian Highlands.
471
THE SICILIAN HIGHLANDS.
WITH the exception of the hinterland
of Calabria, there is probably no part of
Europe so unknown to the ordinary trav-
eler as the interior of Sicily. These in-
lands practically begin at the coastline
all along the circumference of over six
hundred miles ; it is only on the southern
and southwestern coasts, or the desolate
promontory behind which lie the ruins of
Selinunte, and then again at Terranova,
the ancient Gela, and thence along the
sea-loop to Syracuse and Augusta, to
Lentini and Catania, that a mountain-
wall does not at once exclude the inlands
from the shore lands as a country apart.
Of the seven or eight railway lines or
short branches which traverse this Sicil-
ian hinterland at remote distances, only
three are commonly traveled by the tour-
ist in Sicily : the north-coast line from
Messina to Palermo, the east-coast line
from Messina to Syracuse, and the cen-
tral line from Palermo and Termini via
Castrogiovanni to Catania (with its due
south bifurcation from Roccapalumba to
Girgenti). Very few tourists avail them-
selves of the Palermo-Occidental rail-
way, except those interested in the wine
and other export trade of Marsala and
Trapani — or a few of the more erudite
travelers, anxious to break at Calatafimi
for the solitary magnificence of the ruins
of Segesta ; or at Castelvetrano for the
fallen temples of Selinunte (Selinus) ; or
at Marsala to view that promontory of
Lilybaion, the " most splendid city," the
scene of one of the greatest of Roman
sieges, where thirty years earlier the great
Pyrrhus failed disastrously, and where
for generations Melkarth and the gods of
Carthage reigned supreme. Every year,
too, a few classical enthusiasts journey to
Trapani, to see and climb the Monte San
Giuliano of to-day, the Eryx of the an-
1 The highest reach is between Randazzo and
Bronte. Between the watersheds of the Al-
cient world, at whose summit (2500 feet)
stood one of the most famous of all the
shrines of antiquity, that of Venus Ery-
cina, — as, before her, of the Erycinian
Aphrodite of the Hellenes, as, before her,
of the Phoenician Astarte ; and, once
more, as, before her, of the unknown
Goddess of the Sea and of Love, wor-
shiped by the primitive Sikelians, — per-
haps in turn the successor of the Woman
before whom bowed down the semi-leg-
endary Elymians and Sicanians.
The southwest railway between Sira-
cusa and Licata may be said to be wholly
unused either by the " classically mind-
ed " traveler or the ordinary tourist.
The country is desolate and unbeautif ul :
traveling is never comfortable, and in out-
lying regions is sometimes unsafe ; and
the towns of Modica, Ragusa, and Licata
(the Hellenic Phintias) have little to at-
tract the general traveler, though they
have much to interest the folk-lorist.
Even less traversed, save by the few
Sicilians concerned, is the short bifurca-
tion inland, from Lentini to Caltagirone.
There remains only the short line south
from Palermo up into the mountain lands
of Corleone, — concerning which the Pa-
lermitans have a jibe, — that only one
forestiero (foreigner) in a year attempts
the journey, and he never returns !
To these official railway lines must be
added the short CircunWEtnea loop line,
— a narrow mountain-climbing railway
starting westward from Catania or north-
ward from Giarre, and making the cir-
cuit of the vast lava lands of Etna by
Linguaglossa and Terremorte to Ran-
dazzo and Bronte (west, north, and east
of which lies the duchy of Bronte, — the
Sicilian estate of our great Nelson, Duke
of Bronte), — where the line ascends
sometimes to close on 4000 feet,1 to
cantara and the Simeto, a few miles from Ran-
dazzo, the elevation of the line is over 3800
472
The Sicilian Highlands.
Adern6 (the ancient ffadranum), Pa-
tern 6 (Hybla Minor), and southwest-
ward down the lava-ravaged, earthquake-
shaken, southern flanks of Etna, through
a paradise of orange and lemon and
almond, of prickly pear and medlar and
fig, to where the black flood of the vol-
cano stops like an arrested wave outside
the Borgo of Catania.
But if one look at an enlarged map of
Sicily, it will be seen at a glance that by
far the greater part of the island, prac-
tically the whole hinterland from the
coasts, remains uninvaded by the dra-
gone a vapore, — the iron horse, as we
have it. And, in truth, as with so much
of the Basilicata and Calabria, this vast
isolated country is little invaded even by
roads, — roads, that is, as distinct from
stony mule-paths or craggy hillways.
From centres such as Petralia, under
Monte Salvatore of the Madonian moun-
tain range ; or Gangi in its hill- wilder-
ness between Monte Zimmara and Monte
Zambughetti ; or those regional mountain
capitals Nicosia or Troina, one may look
out upon a vast mountainous wilderness
little changed if at all for a thousand
years. Or, again, as wild and lonely a
region may be seen from Mistretta, iso-
lated between the highlands of Tusa and
the great Bosco or forest region of Karo-
nfa to the north of the Nebrodian Range,
or from Novara, swept by the Tyrrhene
winds beating upon the arid crests of the
Peloritanitan (or Peloric) Mountains,
whence one may look far southward past
Roccafiorita or Francavilla to where
Mount Tauros overhangs beautiful Taor-
mina on the Ionian Sea, or far north-
ward to the pearl-white gulf where of
old (with Vulcano and Stromboli and the
other Lipari Islands beyond) sat the
towns of Mylae and Tyndaris and per-
haps Longanum (to-day, respectively,
Milazzo, and La Scala di Capo Tindaro,
feet ; at Maletto, the station for the Castle of
Maniace (the Duke of Bronte) stands at 3700.
1 Not only is the site of the short-lived if not
legendary Longanum uncertain, but it is dis-
and Barcellona1), and even westward to
the long shore where are the Sweet
Waters of Saint Agatha, and that lovely
promontory of Karonia, the Kalakte, or
"beautiful shore," founded by Ducetius
in the fifth century.
To-day, as in the days of the Hellenes
of Sicily, the true centre of the land
Enna (Castrogiovanni). But the famous
home of Persephone is not a suitable
" centre " for the pilgrim to old sites 01
the seeker of interesting or picturesque
survivals. Indeed, except the excursion
to the opposite crag-citadeled town of
Calascibetta, on the north, or, on the
south, to the Lake of Pergusa, " that
beautiful water where Persephone sank,"
a desolate swamp (without charm save
in early spring) reached by an undriv-
able circuitous path, or, on the east, to
Assoro, the site of the ancient Sikelian
town of Assorus, there is none that a
not better be made from a more accea
sible point of departure, — for thougl
Agira (Agyrium) and Centorbi (Ke
turipa) seem near, these can be reached
more conveniently from Adernb, on the
Circum-^Etiiea railway ; whence also, or
from Bronte, it is easier to reach the
mountain towns of Troina and Nicosia.
Moreover, at Castrogiovanni, everything
of to-day is as it was three hundred years
ago, as Sicilians themselves complain.
If, however, the traveler, or travelers
(for it is not agreeable, nor even advis-
able, for strangers to travel alone in
this region) are hardy, and content to
fare roughly in the Holy City of De-
meter and Persephone, and can discard
the service of a carriage for that of mules,
or, at need, can go far afoot, then, cer
tainly, rooms may be taken for a day or
two at the locanda in the Via Roma.
An undulating line drawn througl
the inlands of Sicily will loop at the
six mountain towns: Corleone, in the
pnted that the stream by Barcellona is
Longanus where Hiero, Tyrant of Syraci
defeated the Mamertines in B. c. 269.
The Sicilian Highlands.
473
heart of the western province, some
forty miles due south from Palermo (for
Salemi, the ancient Ifalicyce, some fifty
miles westward toward Marsala, though
it has a population of about 15,000, is
only a rude hill village without an inn) ;
Castrogiovanni, in the heart of the cen-
tral province ; Troina, the " capital " of
the northeast ; Centuripe, high-set among
its craggy ways above the valley of the
Symaithos (Simeto); Randazzo, formerly
&tnea, between which and Troina lie
the lofty forest lands and lower vine-
lands and orange woods of the beautiful
duchy of Bronte ; and Novara, the cen-
tre of the province of Messina.
Corleone is the mountain terminus of
the little line which crawls up from Pa-
lermo, by way of Misilmeri, the Moor-
ish Menztt-al-Ensir. Both at the last-
named and at Corleone, whose name has
changed little from Korliftn, the Sara-
cenic type has survived more strongly
than perhaps anywhere else in Sicily.
There is little of interest to see here :
the population is of the worst Sicilian
type, and the beggars have all the swarm-
ing instinct of those at Cefalu, the gnat-
like insistency of those at Monreale,
and the insolence of those at Girgenti,
with a clamant perseverance and terrible
famished appeal all their own. Still, if
one would traverse the wild and desolate
crossways between Corleone and Cas-
trogiovanni, one must either begin here
or leave the region unexplored. The
best road is that southeast along the
rocky slopes of Monte Cardellia, and
thence to Castionoro, where fresh mules
and a hill guide must be hired for the
mountain paths of the Cammarata. But
for the less hazardous traveler I should
recommend that the Corleone-Prizzi hill
road be left about halfway, at the Ford of
the Amendola, and that then the course
of the Amendola be followed for some
twelve miles by rude goat-ways, till a
road is reached beneath the hill village
of Vicari, which will lead south and then
northeastward to Roccapalumba. There
is neither good accommodation nor tol-
erable fare to be had in the village, but
at the station of the same name (the junc-
tion on the Palermo-Catania Central Line
for Girgenti) one can be fairly sure of a
meal and even of the purchase of provi-
sions. Here as elsewhere, however, one
should remember the cardinal rule for
travel in the interior of Sicily, — name-
ly, to travel with waterproof tent if pos-
sible, but in any case always to carry
ample provender, solid and liquid. Milk
(goat's milk, of course) can sometimes
be procured by the way, but rarely any-
thing else, even bread. In many regions,
too, one must be on guard against drink-
ing the water unboiled.
It is extremely doubtful, however, if
this part of the Sicilian hinterland be
worth the trouble, expense, and fatigue
of a systematic tour. It would be better
for the traveler to start by rail from Gir-
genti in the south, or from Termini-
Imerese (or, better, of course, as so near,
from Palermo itself) on the north, and, by
either route, reach Roccapalumba, hav-
ing previously arranged with the Capo
di Stazione there to procure mules and
a guide. Hence one may pass under
the old half-savage hill town of Alia, —
where it is said certain ancient Moorish
or Saracenic rites as well as types sur-
vive, — across the picturesque and beau-
tiful region of the southern Madonian
spurs to the two Petralias, — Petralia
Soprana, and Petralia Sottana, — and
thence to the remote and almost from
year's end to year's end unvisited moun-
tain town of Gaugi, and so to Nicosia,
of which the citizens claim that it is the
heart of Sicily.
Although in the Nebrodian and Pelo-
ritanitan highlands of the north and
northeast the mountain scenery is, as a
rule, wilder and grander, no trip in cen-
tral Sicily could be more impressive in
its way, or could better afford an idea of
the Sicily of the Middle Ages and of the
Norman and Saracenic days, than that
from Corleone or Termini to Nicosia.
474
The Sicilian Highlands.
If one has time to spare, money to
spend, patience to accept the divers
tribulations of travel in a country less
civilized than England or France many
centuries ago, and a serviceable know-
ledge of Italian (with at least a smatter-
ing of Sicilian colloquial terms), the best
way to make this trip would be to start
from Termini-Imerese, with mules hired,
not at the Grande Albergo della Terme,
where the few foreigners invariably put
up, but at the neighboring and less pre-
tentious Locanda della Fenice. There
is also a very fine forest route, somewhat
shorter, starting inland a few miles east-
ward of Cefalii, via Castelbuono and
Gerace (called Gerace Siculo to distin-
guish it from the Gerace of Calabria) to
Gangi. But from first to last the incon-
veniences of this route are very great.
As to making Gangi a point at which to
rest, or upon which to depend for any
manner of accommodation or service in
that wild and desolate if picturesque hill
capital of one of the most wild and deso-
late regions of Sicily, blessed is he who
expects nothing, for he shall not be dis-
appointed.
Having left Termini-Imerese, then, we
travel eastward two or three miles till
we reach the gray-green waters of the
Fiume Torte, and then diverge due south
by the road to Cerda. In this wild re-
gion, between the Fiuma Torte on the
west and the Fiume Grande (or Imera
Settentrionale) on the east, we are upon
the famous Saracen Road ; for this was
the favorite route of the Carthaginians
of the city which the later Hellenes called
Panormus, and of the Saracens (and Nor-
mans) of Palermo, on their martial or
predatory raids into the interior. On
this steep winding road southward from
Cerda to Sclafani (a desolate township
in a relatively fertile region, where one
must not look to obtain even a cup of
coffee) many a splendid procession of
turbaned and vividly arrayed Orientals
must have ridden proudly through what
they considered subject lands, or re-
turned more proudly still, with spoil and
captives from the Hellenic settlements or
Sikelian towns of the interior. ,
The abrupt racial contrasts so often to
be noted in Sicily are exceptionally evi-
dent here. At Termini-Imerese, for in-
stance, Norman and Roman, or the later
" Sicilian blend," are prevalent ; at Ce-
falu, a few miles away, the Greek type
is to be seen oftener than perhaps any-
where along the north coast, where it is
less frequent than on the southern shores,
and notably at Syracuse, Girgenti, and
Taormina, or rather the vicinage of Ta-
ormina (Letojanni, Gallodoro, Mola,
Graniti, Roccafiorita, Castiglione, and
Linguaglossa) ; and here at Sclafani the
debased Italic type is common, while at
the high hill town opposite, Caltavuturo,
one might almost fancy one's self in El
Keb or other of the mountain towns of
Western Tunisia, or in the beyarchy of
Constantino. It is worth the ascent, to
walk or ride on muleback up the steep
winding road to Caltavuturo, that ancient
Saracenic eyrie perched at a height of
3000 feet. The population (of whom,
at certain seasons, few will be seen, ex-
cept women, children, and old men) will
not beg insistently, as in most places of
the kind, but will stare at one with a
fixed, passive curiosity as concentrated
as that which meets the European in one
of the oasis towns of the Sahara. The
name, too, is Saracenic, and is taken
from the ruined fortress which crowns
the arid rock rising beyond it, much as
Mola rises beyond the Monte di Castello
at Taormina, or, rather, as the Monte di
Castello rises out of and over Taormina.
Till the Arabic tongue faded out of Sici-
ly the hill fortress of Caltavuturo was
Kala't-Abi-Tooro (TMr), — the fortress
town of the lord Abi-Thur.
In the now extraordinary and fantas-
tic savagery of this region a rough ti'i-
angle might be drawn, with Caltavuturo
as its left base, the two Petralias as its
right, and Polizzi with the towering
height of Monte Salvatore and of the
The Sicilian Highlands.
475
Peaks of the Antenna — two of the high-
est summits of the Madonian Range —
as its apex.
There is, except from Mount Etna or
from the Comb of the Cammarata, from
the great rock above Castrogiovanni, or
from the walls of Centuripe or Troina, or
from the beech woods of Maniace at the
summit of the Serra del Re, no view in
Sicily comparable in magnificent range
with that from La Generosa, as Polizzi
is surnamed. This small town, once a
Norman eyrie of Count Roger, — his
mountain whip for the Saracens, — stands
on an extraordinary rock or precipice at
an elevation of over 3000 feet sheer from
the surrounding mountain region. In the
Middle Ages Polizzi was one of the most
prosperous inland towns of the Sicilian
Highlands, though how it could ever have
been so may well puzzle the traveler of
to-day, who looks up to its crag-set height
either in the blaze of the merciless heat
beating with a furnace-wing against the
arid rock, or with the sleety rain and
tempestuous cloud of the tramontane/, or
gregdle in the dreaded stagione di Tem-
porale — the Season of Tempest.
But none will grudge the ascent.
There is, too, a tolerable locanda, not to
put up at, but at which to rest awhile and
enjoy, perhaps, a garlicky omelet or still
more highly savored frittura, and some
strong and crude, but otherwise credita-
ble, red wine. The immense panorama
of the view extends over much of cen-
tral Sicily, — from the last spurs of the
Madonian Range on the north, above
Cefalu and the Tyrrhene Sea, to the
height of Enna in the south; from the
Montemaggiore and Cammarata moun-
tain ranges of the west to the steeps of
Nicosia and Troina and to the snows .of
sky-reaching Etna on the east. Far be-
low, in the rocky valley, foam the tor-
rents which become the Fiume Salso (the
Himera Meridionalis) and the Fiume
Grande (the Himera Septentrionalis).
Near by are the precipitous neighboring
mountain towns of Castellana and Pe-
tralia, and, due south, Alimena, on the
flanks of Monte Balza, — the site, it is
believed, of the ancient Imacha. And
even in the little' town itself there are
things of interest to be seen, — in particu-
lar some fine carving and other sculptural
adornment in the Duomo, or Chiesa Ma-
tinee, as the cathedral church is always
called in Sicily, and in the church of Sta.
Maria degli Angeli a really fine archaic
triptych, brought here no one seems to
know when or by whom, but obviously
painted by a disciple of Memlinc, if not
by the great Fleming himself.
As for the Petralias, I wonder if any
tourist has ever wandered thither by
some strange freak of curiosity or acci-
dent ? Coins and other remains have
been found here in considerable number,
but nothing, I believe, of special inter-
est, or even absolutely to confirm the
fact that here of old stood Petraea.
Gangi, on the other hand, that grimly
sordid centre of a region in part luxuri-
antly fertile, and for the rest desolately
wild, may well draw the archaeologist
who remembers how Verres (who de-
spoiled so many Sicilian fanes and so
many civic treasures, and yet whom we
in a sense gratefully remember as the
cause of some of Cicero's most vivid and
splendid eloquence) swept this Siculo-
Cretan township of all it held most
sacred, and how the great Roman orator
spoke bitterly of the " august and sacred
fane " that, till the robber-praetor came,
still stood here undefiled in honor of the
Cretan Mothers (the " Magna Mater,"
rather, of Cicero's oration). The ama-
teur archaeologist must be on guard,
however ; for the Gangi of to-day is not
the same as that which as Engyum stood
some two miles southward, on the bridle
path leading to Buonpietro. All that
remained of Engyum to the Middle
Ages was destroyed in the last year of
the thirteenth century by the then ruler
of Sicily because of the revolt of its over-
lord, one of the powerful family of Ven-
timiglia.
476
The Sicilian Highlands.
From Gangi to Nicosia is from ten to
twelve miles, though a pedestrian in late
spring or early autumn might think it
twenty.
Nicosia is perhaps the one remote
town of the interior to which a few trav-
elers do annually find their way. These,
however, do not approach from the north-
east or north or west, rarely even from
Castrogiovanni in the south ; but from
Troina in the east, or directly from more
distant Adern6, — which, by comparison
with the rail-unserved towns of the inte-
rior, appears to the inland traveler as a
modern civilized town of excellent parts.
Nicosia is certainly well worth a visit for
its picturesque aspect, standing as it does
on a precipitous steep with two ragged
peaks, on the higher of which are the ruins
of one of Roger the Norman's many cas-
tles or fortresses. Below are the two tor-
rents of the Fiume Salso, and all around
is a region of sometimes beautiful and
always savage and fantastic mountain
scenery. But the interest of the town and
its citizens has been exaggerated. The
one is said to be the most mediaeval-look-
ing town in Sicily, or even in Italy, and
the other are reputed to be both in dia-
lect and appearance a people more Lom-
bard than Sicilian. Nicosia is certainly
" mediaeval " enough, both in dirt and
discomfort, and in general backwardness,
but is less noteworthy in this respect
than, say, Corleone, or even than Bronte,
for all that the latter is on the popu-
lous ^Etnean slope. The " Lombard,"
too, has long since disappeared. As to
the dialect, it seems to be neither better
nor worse than the Sicilian of the coast
lands, though colloquially it no doubt
retains many archaic or debased Lom-
bard words, survivals of the Norman and
Lombard colonists who settled, or were
" planted " here seven or eight centu-
ries ago. For the benefit, however, of
those who think their Italian will carry
them far with Sicilian, let me give a few
lines in the vernacular. A popular son-
net begins, —
A Ddi e a Mmaria. . . . Acussi passa V atr1
anuu. . . .
Another, —
liva u mmiaggiu agghiiri a Bbillafranca.
Another, —
A nna~tru lu 'ngiuriani Sam Pasquali.
But as the most popular sonetti are thoa
in dialogue, here is a typical example, —
mercifully given only in part : —
Chi ffa la chiina ?! ...
— A ddocu ! . . . taliati !
Ari 'ria facci di malacunnutta
Co 'm pari veru ! . . .
— Bbah ! . . . si vi fidati
D' idda pi ccamadora, vi cci ammutta
Certu ddagghiusu a mmari : 'un ci pinzati !
Pi ccomu la canussciu ji' ! . . .
— Cchiu ssutt
L'acqui fannu trimari ! 'Ntrubulati
Tunnu p' unn' en' e gghi& ! . . . (etc.)
A friend in Taormina, to whom I showed
this, remarked that it took away from him
all desire to visit the interior, as he could
not sleep a night in a place where he
heard any one — " murderer or mur-
dered " — " sputtering " words like, —
Certu ddagghiusu a mmari . . . 'Ntrubulati
Tunnu p' unn' en' e gghifc !
The hill town of Troina, some twelve
miles eastward, is better worth a visit.
From both, it should be added, are to
had the noblest views of Etna in its full
gigantic magnificence. Troina is calle
the highest town in Sicily, but there ai
several at a greater elevation, thougl
certainly, it looks a more inaccessible
eyrie than any other mountain citadel.
The neighboring JEtnean township of
Maletto, for example, is higher in actm
elevation above the sea by about a hur
dred feet (3730). Here, at Troina, the
people are indeed primitive. I writ
this article at Taormina, and only a fev
days ago a good lady came to this " dz
zling " place in the great outer world or
her first visit away from her mountaii
town, though she is nearer seventy thar
sixty ; and it was strange to note he
anxiety to behold at first hand thre
things she had never seen, — a steamei
a train, and a piano. The steamer wa
The Sicilian Highlands.
477
too far away to impress her much ; the
train, even viewed from the safe distance
of the station wall at Giardini, had more
of terror than of delight ; but before the
marvel of the piano her whole soul all
but worshiped and adored.
No one who visits Troina is likely to
omit a visit to its rival, Centuripe or
Centorbi, where to this day more coins,
terra-cottas, and other Graeco - Roman
fragments are found than almost any-
where else in Sicily. The people here
are markedly of the Hellenic type or
types, though the Roman or Neronian
face is often to be seen among the lithe
stalwart youth. Probably the real Sicil-
ian of the earlier Middle Ages survives
more in Troina and Centorbi than in any
other Trinaerian town.
Novara, far away in the northeast,
the hill capital of the Messenian High-
lands, or the " Neptunian mountains,"
or " Peloric range," as the geographers
and historians have it, is practically
never visited. From the north, it can
be best reached by the village of Fal-
cone in the Gulf of Milazzo, about half-
way between Barcellona and Patti, — a
long and arduous but superbly beautiful
ascent. But few will ever attempt that
route. From the south, by mule, I
should recommend either the northeast
route from Randazzo (a guide, and per-
haps a single carabiniero escort, and
certainly ample store of provender,
should be taken), or, if the traveler be
a good climber and willing to " rough
it," and able also to risk rapidly vary-
ing climatic changes, to go from Taor-
mina — the Eden of Sicily, where it
rests in inexhaustible beauty and charm
on its chasm-riven crags above the
Ionian Sea — either up behind Mola
and Monte Venere, and then by way of
Graniti and Francavilla, or first to Leto-
janni on the eastern Corniche, and then
northward and upward by Gallodoro,
Mongiuffi, and Roccafiorita. At these
last-named villages, however, the people
are often unfriendly, and at best are apt
to be sullen. It will be well, therefore,
not to accede to any prior requests for
a halt for food or rest there, unless for
change of mules. But except for the
splendid views, — hardly, however, so
exceptional as to be worth the fatigue and
trouble of the excursion, — there is no-
thing to see in Novara itself, and even
the archaeologist is hardly likely to be im-
pelled by any passionate desire to view
the site of ancient Abacaenum. At Roc-
cafiorita, I may add, one day last spring,
I came upon a brotherhood of three re-
joicing in the baptismal names Orestes,
.^Eschylus (jffischllb), . . . and Gala-
had (Galahotto) ! and heard of a girl
of the place called Saffa (Sappho,
Psappha). At Taormina and Syracuse,
indeed, there are many Greek names in
common use among the people. I have
been shaved by an Orestes in the one,
and by a Diodoro in the other, and, in
the same street as the latter, saw Olisso
(Ulysses) and Ullissu (Sicilian) twice,
and Dionisio (Dionysius) and Empedo-
cle, above shops or handicraft quarters.
Medea and Aretusa, and other Greek
women-names survive ; and among the
two or three hundred vine laborers on
the lands of Maniace, in the duchy of
Bronte, are such unexpected baptismal
names as the ancient Zeffonla and
Sephone, both (like the Sicilian Ssuf-
finnu) a corruption of Persephone —
and as the more modern surname Kyrie-
eleison ! Indeed, there are at least a
score of vintagers — possibly a score of
families — on the Maniace estate, whose
name of Kyrieeleison (Pietro Kyrieelei-
son, Maria Kyrieeleison, Giorgio Kyrie-
eleison, and so forth — modern Graeco-
Sicilian colonists, no doubt) I have seen
entered on the Duke of Bronte's labor
list, kindly brought to me for my inter-
ested investigation by Mr. Charles Beek,
Lord Bridport's (the Duke of Bronte's)
agent at Castello di Maniace, the ducal
residence.
From Castello di Maniace date some
of my most memorable and delightful
478
The Sicilian Highlands.
experiences of inland Sicily. In the
company of the Duca Alessandro J — or
the Ducckino, the Young Duke, as he is
commonly called — I have seen more of
the wild and beautiful country behind
Etna than would be practicable other-
wise. The duchy of Bronte is, in itself,
one of the most remarkable tracts in
Sicily, stretching as it does from the
high plateau of lava-covered lands near
the Lake of Gurrida (between Randaz-
zo and Maletto), — the Baize, as it is
called, and not only the legendary scene
of the wanderings of Demeter, but the
historical background of a great battle
wherein the Saracen host was routed by
the Greek general Maniaces and his ally
— of all unexpected persons, Harald
Hardrada, future King of Norway, with
his fierce Northmen ! — to the superb
orange forest of the ravines of the Sime-
to (Symaithos), miles away beyond Ma-
niace Castle and its vinelands, and dis-
tant, half-savage, hill-set Bronte itself,
and more than a thousand feet lower.
At Maletto one looks over a great re-
gion that is all the duchy ; and at
Bronte, ten or twelve miles away, at
another part of it ; and from the hills
above the Simeto at another part, hidden
below the gorges of that classic and
beautiful stream ; and from the far-
stretching vinelands of Maniace, below
the fantastic hill of Rapiti, as from the
beautiful gardens and north end of the
castle itself, up at hill rising from hill,
and mountain ridge cresting upon moun-
tain ridge, first to the oak woods of the
Serraspina, and then to the famous ducal
beech forests of the Serra del Re.
I have lived amid and traversed this
wonderful region — which one regrets
that the first Duke of Bronte, our great
Nelson, never saw — in spring and au-
1 Lord Bridport's son, the Hon. Alex. Nel-
son Hood, Administrator-General of the duchy
of Bronte.
tumn and winter, and hardly know
when it is loveliest. Doubtless it has a
supreme loveliness in March and April,
when the lava-wilderness blossoms with
the yellow flowers of the spurge, — that
characteristic Sicilian plant, the euphor
bia, more characteristic even than the
cactus or prickly pear ("Indian fig"),
so omnipresent throughout Sicily am
southern Italy, and yet so strangely ig
nored by both painter and poet that I car
remember no painting wherein it take
its dominant place, and only a single
poem in which it is even mentioned,
one of the lovely " sonetti di natura sel-
vaggia " in the Flora of Alinda Bruna
monti ; and there, as Veleni (used equiv-
alently to fleurs-dii-mal), the poet see
only the evil side of this beautiful if poi-
sonous plant : —
Euforbie gonfie di maligno latte,
Neri solani e di cicuta ombrelle
Consacrate alia morte atre sorelle,
Grescon tra sassi dove il Sol non batte. . .
At this season, too, every variety of
crocus and lily and violet, of jonquil anc
narcissus and iris, almost every wild
bloom of north and south, from the wil
rose to the asphodel, appears in incred-
ible luxuriance. This is the season of
Persephone, and of the youth of the
world. But inland Sicily is not a joyoi
land, and I think its beauty is less poign-
ant and more exquisite in late Octot
or early November. Is there anything
in Europe finer than the beech forests of
the Serra del Re when the wind fror
Etna, blowing at a height of six to eight
thousand feet, moves across this golc
and amber mountain raiment, immense
primeval, solitary, on the neck of the
vast Sicilian watershed ; or, anywhere, is
there another Enchanted Garden like
that giardino selvaggio of the Castle
Maniace, surrounded by giant poplars
vast tremulous columns of shaken br
unfailing gold ?
William Sharp.
The Common Lot.
479
THE COMMON LOT.1
XII.
THE Phillipses had spent the winter
in Europe. Mrs. Phillips was still add-
ing to her collection for the new house,
— Forest Manor as she had dubbed it.
Leaving Venetia in Paris with some
friends, she descended upon Italy, the
rage for buying in her soul. There she
gathered up the flotsam of the dealers, —
marbles, furniture, stuffs, — a gold ser-
vice in Naples, a vast bed in Milan, bat-
tered pictures in Florence. Mrs. Phil-
lips was not a discriminating amateur ;
she troubled her soul little over the au-
thenticity of her spoil. To San Giorgio,
Simonetti, Richetti, and their brethren
in the craft, she was a rich harvest, and
they put up many a prayer for her re-
turn another season.
In March of that year, Jackson Hart,
struggling with building strikes in Chi-
cago, had a cablegram from the widow.
" Am buying wonderful marbles in Flor-
ence. Can you come over ? " The ar-
chitect laughed as he handed the mes-
sage to his wife. " Some one ought to
head her off ! She '11 send over a ship-
load of fakes." Helen, thinking that he
needed the vacation, urged him gener-
ously to accept the invitation and get a
few weeks in Italy. But it was no time
just then for vacation : he was in the
grip of business, and another child was
coming to them.
From time to time Mrs. Phillips's
treasures arrived at Forest Park, and
were stored in the great hall of her
house. Then late in the spring the wid-
ow telephoned the architect.
" Yes ! I am back," came her brisk,
metallic tones from the receiver. " Glad
to be home, of course, with all the dirt
and the rest of it. How are you getting
on ? I hear you are doing lots of things.
Maida Rainbow told me over there in
Paris that you were building the Bush-
fields an immense house. I am so glad
for you, — I hope you are coining mon-
ey!"
" Not quite that," he laughed back.
" I want you to see all the treasures I
have bought. I 've ruined myself and
the children. However, you '11 think
it 's worth it, I 'm sure. You must tell
me what to do with them. Come over
Sunday, can 't you ? How is Mrs. Hart ?
Bi-ing her over, too, of course."
Thus she gathered him up on her re-
turn, with that dexterous turn of the
wrist which exasperated her righteous
brother-in-law. On the Sunday, Jack-
son went to see the " treasures," but
without Helen, who made an excuse of
her mother's weekly visit. He found
the widow in the stable, directing the
efforts of two men servants in unpacking
some cases.
" How are you ? "
She extended a strong, flexible hand
to Hart, and with the other motioned to-
ward a marble that was slowly emerging
from the packing straw.
" Old copy of a Venus, the Syracuse
one. It will be great in the hall, won't
it?"
" It 's ripping ! " he exclaimed warm-
ly. " Where did you get that bench ? "
"You don't like it?"
" Looks to be pure fake."
"Simonetti swore he knew the very
room where it 's been for over a hundred
years."
" Oh ! He probably slept on it ! "
" Come into the house and see the
other things. I have some splendid
pictures."
For an hour they examined the arti-
cles she had bought, and the architect
was sufficiently approving to delight the
Copyright, 1903, by ROBERT HEBBICK.
480
The Common Lot.
widow. Neither one had a pure, reti-
cent taste. Both were of the modern
barbarian type that admires hungrily,
and ravishes greedily from the treasure
house of the Old World what it can get,
what is left to get, piling the spoil hel-
ter-skelter into an up-to-date American
house. Mediaeval, Renaissance, Italian,
French, Flemish, — it was all one ! They
would turn Forest Manor into one of
those bizarre, corrupt, baroque museums
that our lavish plunderers love, — elec-
tric-lighted, telephoned, with gilded mar-
ble fireplaces, massive bronze candelabra,
Persian rugs, Gothic choir stalls, French
bronzes, — a house of barbarian spoil !
A servant brought in a tray of liquors
and cigarettes ; they sat in the midst of pic-
tures and stuffs, and sipped and smoked.
" Now," Mrs. Phillips announced
briskly, " I want to hear all about you."
" It 's only the old story, — more jobs
and strikes, — the chase for the nimble
dollar," he answered lightly. " You have
to run faster for it all the time."
" But you are making money ? " she
questioned directly.
" I 'm spending it ! "
He found it not difficult to tell her
the state of his case. She nodded com-
prehendingly, while he let her see that
his situation was not altogether as pros-
perous as it appeared on the surface.
Payments on buildings were delayed on
account of the strikes ; office expenses
crept upwards ; and personal expenses
mounted too. And there was the con-
stant pressure of business, the fear of a
cessation in orders.
" We may have to move back to town.
That Loring place is pretty large to
swing. In town you can be poor in ob-
scurity."
" Nonsense ! You must not go back.
People will know that you have n't money.
You are going to get bigger things to do.
And you are so young. My ! Not thirty-
five ! "
Her sharp eyes examined the man
frankly, sympathetically, approving him
swiftly. His clay was like hers ; he
would succeed — in the end.
" Come ! I have an idea. Why
should n't you build here, on my land ?
Something pretty and artistic, — it would
help you, of course. I know the very
spot, just the other side of the ravine,
— in the hickories. Do you remember
it?"
In her enthusiasm she proposed to go
at once to examine the site. Pinning a
big hat on her head, she gathered up her
long skirt, and they set forth, following
a neat wood-path that led from the north
terrace into the ravine, across a little
brook, and up the other bank.
" Now, here ! " She pointed to a patch
of hazel bushes. " See the lake over
there ! And my house is almost hid.
You would be quite by yourselves."
He hinted that to build even on this
charming spot a certain amount of capi-
tal would be needed. She frowned and
settled herself on the stump of a tree.
" Why don't you try that Harris man ?
You know him. He made a heap of
money for me once, — corn, I think.
He knew just what was going to happen.
He 'a awfully smart, and he 's gone in
with Rainbow, you know. I am sure he
could make some money for you."
" Or lose it ? "
She laughed scornfully at the idea of
losing.
" Of course you have got to risk some-
thing. I would n't give a penny for a
man who would n't trust his luck. You
take my advice and see Harris. Tell
him I sent you."
She laughed again, with the conviction
of a successful gambler, and it became
her to laugh, for it softened the lines of
her mouth.
She was now forty-one years old, and
she appeared to Jackson to be younger
than when he had first gone to see her
about the house. She had come back
from Europe thinner than she had been
for several years. Her hair was per-
fectly black, still undulled by age, and
The Common Lot.
481
her features had not begun to sharpen
noticeably. She had another ten years
of active, selfish woman's life before her,
and she knew it.
Meantime he had grown older, so that
they were much nearer together. She
treated him quite as her equal in experi-
ence, and that flattered him.
" Yes," she continued, in love with
her project, "there is n't a nicer spot all
along the shore. And you would be next
door, so to say. You could pay for the
land when you got ready."
She gave him her arm to help her in
descending the steep bank of the ravine,
and she leaned heavily on him. The
June sun lay warmly about the big house
as they returned to it. The shrubbery
had grown rankly around the terrace,
doing its best in its summer verdancy
to cover the naked walls. Beneath the
bluff the laka lapped at the sandy shore
in a summer drowse. The architect
looked at the house he had built, with
renewed pride. It was pretentious and
ambitious, mixed in motive like this wo-
man, like himself. He would have fitted
into the place like a glove, if his uncle had
done the right thing ! Somewhat the
same thought was in the widow's mind.
" It was a shame that old Powers
treated you so shabbily ! It ought to
have been yours."
They stood for a moment on the ter-
race, looking at the house. Yes, it was
like them both ! They loved equally the
comforts and the luxuries and the powers
of this our little life. And they were
bold to snatch what they wanted from
the general feast.
" You must make Harris do something
for you ! " she mused. " You can't bury
yourself in a stuffy flat." Then in a few
moments she added, " How 's that hand-
some wife of yours ? I hear she 's going
to have another child." She continued
with maternal, or, perhaps, Parisian, di-
rectness, — " Two babies, and not on
your feet yet ! You must n't have any
more. These days children are no un-
VOL. xcni. — NO. 558. 31
mixed blessing, I can tell you. . . . Ve-
netia ? I left her in the East with some
friends. She 's too much for me, already.
She needs a husband who can use the
curb."
When Jackson reported to Helen the
widow's offer, his wife said very quickly,
" I had rather go back to the city,
Francis ! "
" Why ? " he asked with some irrita-
tion.
" Because, because " —
She put her arms about his neck in
her desire to make him feel what she
could not say. But he was thinking of
Mrs. Phillips's advice to see the broker,
and merely kissed her in reply to her
caress. It was the year of the great bull
market, when it seemed as if wealth
hung low on every bough, and all that a
bold man had to do to win a fortune was
to pick his stock and make his stake. . . .
Forest Park was very gay that sum-
mer. There were perpetual dinners and
house parties and much polo at the
Shoreham Club. The architect, who was
very popular, went about more than ever,
sometimes with his wife, and often alone,
as her health did not permit much ef-
fort. Occasionally he played polo, tak-
ing the place of one of the regular team,
and usually when there was a match he
stopped at the club on his way from the
city.
One of these polo Wednesdays, late in
August, Helen strolled along the shore-
path in the direction of the Phillipses'
place, with an idea of calling on Venetia
Phillips, if her strength held out. The
path followed the curves of the bluff in
full view of the lake, from which rose
a pleasant coolness like a strong odor.
Back from the edge of the bluff, in the
quiet of well - spaced trees, stood the
houses. They seemed deserted on this
midsummer afternoon ; those people who
had the energy to stir had gone to the
polo grounds. The Phillips house was
asleep, but Helen finally roused a ser-
482
The Common Lot.
vant, who departed in search of Venetia.
The silence of the long drawing-room,
with its close array of dominating furni-
ture, oppressed her. She moved about
restlessly, then crossed the hall to an
open window, where from the north the
lake air was floating into the close house.
Outside on the terrace there were voices.
The murmur of the voices was broken
by a laugh which she knew to be her hus-
band's, and she started forward in sur-
prise. Through the open window she
could see the blue lake, and, nearer, a cor-
ner of the north terrace, where the lux-
uriant vines curtained a sheltered nook.
Jackson and Mrs. Phillips were there,
leaning slightly forward in the animation
of their talk. The widow put her hand
on the architect's arm to emphasize her
words, and it lay there while she looked
into the man's face with her vivacious,
gleaming eyes. The odor of Jackson's
cigar floated up through the open win-
dow into Helen's face.
It was nothing. She had no suspicion
of wrong, or jealousy of this woman, who
liked men, — all men. Yet some unfa-
miliar pain gripped her heart. Some
mysterious and hostile force had entered
her field, and she seemed to see it pic-
tured, dramatized here before her in this
little scene, a man and a woman with
chairs pulled close together, their faces
aglow with eager f eelings ! The other
part of her husband, that side she dimly
felt and put from her with dread, was
fed by this woman. And the wife hated
her for it.
She lingered a moment, not listening,
but trying to still her beating heart, not
daring to trust herself to move. . . .
There was nothing evil, however, be-
tween those two on the terrace. The ar-
chitect had come from town by an early
train to see the polo, and there Mrs. Phil-
lips had found him, and had brought him
home in her automobile. She had just
learned a piece of news that concerned
the architect closely, and they were dis-
cussing it in the shade and quiet of the
north terrace.
" I know they 're going to start soon.
The judge let it out last night. He 's
no friend of yours, of course, because I
like you. You must get hold of your
cousin and the other trustees."
It was here that Mrs. Phillips laid her
hand on the young man's arm in her
eagerness. Hart murmured his thanks,
thinking less of the widow than of the
trustees of the Powers Jackson bequest.
" It '11 be the biggest thing of its kind
we have had in this city for years. It 's
only right that you should have it, too.
Can't your wife win over the judge?
He 's always talking about her."
It was not strange that the man should
take the woman's hand in the end, and
hold it while he expressed his gratitude
for all her good offices to him. It was a
pleasant hand to hold, and the woman
was an agreeable woman to have in
one's confidence. Naturally, he could not
know that she considered all men base,
— emotionally treacherous and false-
hearted. . . .
Venetia found Helen in the drawing-
room, very white, her lips trembling, and
beads of perspiration on her forehead.
" It 's nothing," the older woman pro-
tested. " I should n't have walked so
far. And naw I must go back at once,
— yes, really I must. I 'm so sorry ! "
" Let me call Mr. Hart," Venetia
said, troubled by the woman's face. " I
saw him come in with mamma a little
while ago."
"No, no, I prefer not, please. It
would worry him."
Then Venetia drove her home, and left
her calmer, more herself, but still cold.
She kissed her, with a girl's demonstra-
tiveness, and the older woman burst into
tears.
" I am so weak and so silly ! I see
things queerly," she explained, endeavor-
ing to smile.
After the girl had gone, Helen tried to
recover her ordinary calm. She played
The Common Lot.
483
with the little Francis, who was beginning
to venture along the walls and chairs of
his nursery, testing the power in his stur-
dy legs. This naive manifestation of
his masculine quality touched the mother
strangely. She saw in this germ of man-
hood the future of the boy. What other
of man's instincts would he have ? Would
he, too, fight for his share of the spoil of
the world ?
The terrible hour of her woman's agony
was fast approaching, when she should
put forth another being into the struggle
with its mates. She did not shrink from
the pain before her, although she began
to wonder if it might not end her own
life, having that dark foreboding com-
mon to sensitive women at this crisis.
If death came, now, what had she
done with her life ? She would leave it
like a meal scarce tasted, a task merely
played with. This afternoon when she
saw her husband, so remote from her,
traveling another road, a bitter sense of
the fruitlessness of all living had entered
her heart. This husband, whom she had
so passionately loved !
An hour later, as the architect was
taking his leave of Mrs. Phillips, the
butler brought him a telephone message
from his house. His wife was suddenly
taken ill. He raced home through the
leafy avenues in the big touring car,
which fortunately stood ready to take
him. He found Helen white and ex-
hausted, her eyes searching the vacant
horizon of her bedroom.
"Why, Nell! Poor girl!" he ex-
claimed, leaning over her, trying to kiss
her. " Venetia said you were there this
afternoon. Why did n't you let me
know ? "
Her lips were cold and scarcely closed
to his caress. She pushed him gently
from her, wishing to be alone in her trial.
But shortly, purging her heart of any
suspicion or jealousy, — still haunted by
that fear of death, — she drew him again
to her.
" You were with Mrs. Phillips. I
did n't — It 's all right, Francis. I love
you, dear ! "
XHI.
Rumor had it that the Powers Jack-
son trust was about to be fulfilled. It
had become known among the friends of
the trustees that during these prosperous
times the fund for the educational pro-
ject had grown apace, and was now esti-
mated to be from five to six millions of
dollars. It was understood that certain
trustees were in favor of handing over
this munificent bequest to a large local
university, with the stipulation that a part
of the money should be devoted to some
form of manual training or technological
school on the West Side.
One morning Jackson Hart read from
the newspaper an item to the effect that
negotiations were under way with the
university.
" So that 's their game ! " he exclaimed
to Helen, seeing an unexpected check to
his ambition. He went away to the train,
trying to remember who were the influ-
ential trustees of the university, and won-
dering whether, after all, there would be
any monumental building. He scarcely
noticed his wife's disgust over the news.
She was stirred unwontedly to think
that already to this extent had the old
man's design become blurred !
"He did n't care for universities
or theoretical education," she protested
warmly the next time she met Judge
Phillips on the Chicago train.
Pemberton, also one of the trustees,
was sitting beside the judge. He listened
gravely to Helen's speech. The judge,
who preferred to talk babies or shrubs
with a pleasant young woman, admitted
that there had been some negotiations
with the university ; but nothing had been
decided.
"Mr. Hollister seems to be against it.
You '11 have to talk to Pemberton here.
It was his idea ! "
484
The Common Lot.
" He would n't have done it ! " Helen
protested, looking at Pemberton. " We
often used to talk over college education.
He thought that colleges educated the
leaders, the masters; and there would
always be enough of that kind of institu-
tion. He wanted to do something with
his money for 'the people ! "
" Yes, of course, it must be a technical
school," Pemberton replied dryly, " and
it must be out there on the West Side."
" But for the people, the working peo-
ple," she insisted.
" Naturally ! But we are all the ' peo-
ple,' are n't we, Mrs. Hart ? I have n't
much sympathy with this talk nowadays
about the ' people ' as opposed to any
other class."
" That 's the unions ! " the judge nod-
ded sagely. " We are all the ' people ' !
We want to offer the best kind of educa-
tion for the poor boy or the rich boy.
What was Powers himself ? His school
must be a place to help boys such as he
was."
They were both completely at sea as to
the donor's real intentions, she felt sure,
and she was eager to have them see the
matter as she saw it. Suddenly ideas
came to her, things she wished to say,
things that seemed to her very important
to say. She remembered talks that she
had had with the old man, and certain re-
marks about college education which had
dropped from him like sizzling metal.
" But a technological school like the
one in Boston," — Pemberton had in-
stanced this famous school as an exam-
ple they should follow, — " that 's a place
to educate boys out of their class, to make
them ambitious, to push them ahead of
their mates into some higher class."
" Well ? " asked Pemberton. « What 's
the matter with that idea ? "
"Uncle wanted something so differ-
ent ! He wanted to make boys good
workmen, to give them something to be
contented with when they had just labor
before them, daily labor, in the factories
and mills."
The judge's face was puckered in
puzzle. He was of an older generation,
and he could see life only in the light of
competition. Free competition, that was
his ideal. And the constant labor disputes
in Chicago had thickened his prejudices
against the working people as a class.
He believed that their one aim was to get
somebody's money without working for it.
But the other man was more respon-
sive. He felt that this woman had an
idea, that she knew perhaps what the
benefactor really wanted, and so they
talked of the school until the train
reached Chicago.
" Well," the judge said, as the people
bustled to leave the car, " I hope we can
get the thing settled pretty soon, and
start on the building. I want to see
something done before I die."
" Yes," Helen assented. " I should
think you would want to see the school
go up. I hope Jackson will have the
building of it."
She expressed this hope very simply,
without considering how it might strike
the trustees. It was merely a bit of sen-
timent with her that her husband, who
had got his education from Powers Jack-
son, might, as a pure labor of love, in
gratitude, build this monument to the old
man. It did not then enter her mind
that there would be a very large profit in
the undertaking. She assumed that the
architect would do the work without pay !
But Pemberton's thin lips closed cold-
ly, and the judge's reply made her face
turn crimson for her indelicacy.
" We have n't got that far yet, Mrs.
Hart. It 's probable that we shall have
a competition of designs."
The two men raised their hats and dis-
appeared into the black flood pouring
across the bridge, while she got into an
omnibus. That remark of hers, she felt,
might have undone all the good of the
talk they had had about the old man's
plan. Her cheeks burned again as she
thought of hinting for favors to her hus-
band. It seemed a mean, personal seek-
The Common Lot.
485
ing, when she had been thinking solely of
something noble and pure.
This idea distressed her until she was
engulfed in that mammoth caravansary
where one half of Chicago shops and, in-
cidentally, meets its acquaintances and
gossips. She hurried hither and thither
in this place in the nervous perturbation
of buying. Finally, she had to mount to
the third floor to have a correction made
in her account. There, in the centre of
the building, nearly an acre of floor space
was railed off for the office force, the
bookkeepers and tally clerks and cash-
iers. Near the aisle thirty or forty girls
were engaged in stamping little yellow
slips. Each had a computation machine
before her and a pile of slips. Now and
then some girl would glance up listlessly
from her work, let her eyes wander va-
cantly over the vast shop, and perhaps
settle for a moment on the face of the
lady who was waiting before the cashier's
window. This store boasted of the ex-
cellent character of its employees. They
were of a neater, more intelligent, more
American class thant those employed in
other large retail stores. Even here, how-
ever, they had the characteristic marks
of dull, wholesale labor.
Helen was hypnotized by the constant
punch, click, and clatter of the compu-
tation machines, the repeated movements
of the girls' arms as they stretched out
for fresh slips, inserted them in the ma-
chines, laid them aside. This was the la-
bor of the great industrial world, — con-
stant, rhythmic as a machine is rhythmic,
deadening to soul and body. Standing
there beside the railing, she could hear
the vast clatter of our complex life, which
is carried on by just such automata as
these girls ! What was the best educa-
tion to offer them, and their brothers and
fathers and lovers ? What would give
them a little more sanity, more joy and
humanity ? — that was the one great ques-
tion of education. Not what would make
them and their fellows into department
managers or proprietors !
The receipted bill came, with a polite
bow. She stuffed the change into her
purse and hurried away, conscious that
the girl nearest the railing was looking
languidly at the back of her gown.
Before going to the Auditorium to
meet some women who were to lunch
with her there, she stopped at her hus-
band's office. The architect had moved
lately to the top story of a large new
building on Michigan Avenue, where his
office had expanded. He had taken a
partner, a pleasant, smooth-faced young
man, Fred Stewart, who had excellent
connections in the city, which were ex-
pected to bring business to the firm.
Cook was still the head draughtsman,
but there were three men and a steno-
grapher under him now. His faith in
Hart had been justified, and yet at times
he shook his head over some of the work
which passed through the office.
He recognized Helen when she en-
tered the outer office, and opened the
little wicket gate for her to step inside.
" Your husband 's busy just now, been
shut up with a contractor most all the
morning. Something important 's on
probably. Shall I call him ? "
" No," she answered. " I '11 wait a
while. Is this the new work ? " She
pointed in surprise to the sketches on
the walls of the office.. "It's so long
since I have been in the office. I had
no idea you had done so much."
" More 'n that, too ! There 's some we
don't hang out here," the draughtsman
answered. " We 've kept pretty busy ! "
He liked his boss's wife. She had a
perfectly simple, kindly manner with all
the world, and a face that men love.
The year before she had had Cook and
his younger brother in the country over
Sunday, and treated them like " distin-
guished strangers," as Cook expressed it.
" That 's the Bushfields' house, — you
know it, perhaps ? This is Arnold Starr's
residence at Marathon Point, — Colonial
style. That's an Odd Fellows hall in
Peoria. I did that myself."
486
The Common Lot.
Helen said something pleasant about
the blunt elevation of the Odd Fellows
hall.
" That 'a the Graveland," he contin-
ued, pointing to a dingy photograph that
she recognized. " It was called after the
contractor's name. We did that the first
year."
" Yes, I think I remember," she mur-
mured. That was the building her hus-
band had done for the disreputable con-
tractor, who had made it a mere lath-
and-plaster shell.
She kept on around the room, study-
ing the photographs and sketches.
Among the newer ones there were sev-
eral rows of semi-detached houses that,
in spite of the architect's efforts, looked
as if they had been carved out of the
same piece of cake. Some of these were
so brazen in their commonplaceness that
she thought they must be the work of the
Cooks. Probably Hart had got to that
point of professional success where he
merely " criticised " a good many of the
less important sketches, leaving the men
in the office to work them out.
She sat down to wait, her interest in
the office sketches dulled. They were
like the products of the great emporium
that she had just left, — of all marketable
kinds to suit all demands. The architect
worked in all the " styles," — Gothic, ear-
ly English, French chateau, etc. There
was nothing sincere, honest, done because
the man could do it that way and no other.
It was clever contrivance.
Men came and went in the offices, the
little doors fanning back and forth in
an excitement of their own. The place
hummed with business ; messengers and
clerks came in from the elevators ; con-
tractors exchanged words with the busy
Cook ; and through all sounded the in-
cessant call of the telephone, the bang
of the typewriter. A hive of industry !
It would have pleased the energetic soul
of the manager of Steele's emporium.
Meantime the wife was thinking,
" What does it mean to him ? " When
they began their married life in a flat
on the North Side, Jackson had brought
his sketches home ; they had kept a little
closet-like room off the hall where he
worked evenings. But from the time
they had moved into the Loring house
he had rarely brought home his work ;
he was too tired at night and felt the
need for distraction. Had he lost his
interest in the art side of his profession ?
Was he turning it into a money-making
business, like Steele's ? She reproached
herself as the spender and enjoyer, with
the children, of this money, which came
out of these ephemeral and gaudy build-
ings, whose pictures dotted the walls.
She was roused by the sound of her
husband's voice. He was coming through
the inner door, and he spoke loudly,
cheerily to his companion.
" Well, then, it 's settied. Shall I have
Nelson draw the papers ? " A thick,
cautious voice replied, " There ain't any
hurry, is there ? What in hell do we
want of paper, anyway ? "
Then they emerged into the outer of-
fice. The stranger's square, heavy face,
his grizzled beard, and thick eyebrows
were not unknown to her.
" Why ! You here ! " the architect
exclaimed, when he caught sight of his
wife. " Why did n't you let me know ?
Always tell Miss Fair to call me."
He took her hand, and putting his
other hand under her chin he gave her
a little caress, like a busy, indulgent
husband.
"Who was that man, Francis?" she
asked.
" The one who came out with me ?
That was a contractor, a fellow named
Graves."
She had it on her lips to say, " And
you promised me once that you would
never have anymore business with him."
But she was wise, and said simply, " I
came away this morning without enough
money, and I have those women at
luncheon, you know."
" Of course ! Here ! " He rang a bell
The Common Lot.
487
and pulled a little cheque book from a
mass of papers, letters, memoranda that
he carried in his pocket. He made out
a cheque quickly with a fountain pen,
still standing.
" There, Miss Fair ! " He handed
the cheque to the waiting stenographer.
" Get that cashed at the bank downstairs
and give the money to Mrs. Hart."
When the young woman, with an im-
personal glance at the husband and wife,
had disappeared, the architect turned to
Helen and pulled out his watch.
" I may have to go to St. Louis to-
night. If you don't see me on the five
two, you '11 know I have gone. I '11 be
back Saturday, anyway. That's when
we dine with the Crawfords, don't we ? "
His mind gave her only a superficial
attention, and yet lie seemed happy in
spite of the pressure of his affairs. The
intoxication of mere activity, the excite-
ment of " doing," so potent in our coun-
try, had got its grip on him. In his
brown eyes there burned a fire of restless
thoughts, schemes, combinations, which
he was testing in his brain all the time.
Yet he chatted courteously, while they
waited for the stenographer to return.
" By the way," he remarked, " I tel-
ephoned Everett this morning, and he
says there 's nothing in that story about
their giving the university the money.
He says Hollister knows uncle would n't
have wanted it, and Hollister is dead set
against it."
" Judge Phillips and Mr. Pemberton
were on the train with me this morning,
and they talked about it. They don't
seem altogether clear what the trustees
will do. I hope they won't do that. It
would be too bad ! "
" I should say so ! " Jackson added
warmly.
He accompanied his wife downstairs,
and bought her some violets from the
florist in the vestibule. They parted at
the street corner. She watched him un-
til he was swallowed up by the swift
flowing stream on the walk, her heart a
little sad. He was admirable toward
her in every way. And yet — and yet —
she hated the bustle of the city that had
caught up her husband, and set him turn-
ing in its titanic, heartless embrace.
There rose before her the memory of
those precious days on the sea when they
had begun to love.
XIV.
Hart had lately bought a couple of
hunters, and Sundays, when it was good
weather, they often went over to the club
stables to see the horses and the hounds.
It was a pleasant spot of a fine summer
morning. The close-cropped turf rolled
gently westward to a large horizon of
fields, where a few isolated trees, branch-
ing loftily, rose against a clear sky. The
stables were hidden in a little hollow,
and beyond was a paddock where a yelp-
ing pack of hounds was kept. Close at
hand at one side crouched in their pen
some captive foxes, listening sharp-eyed
to the noisy dogs.
No sports of any kind were allowed on
Sundays. The community was severely
orthodox in regard to the observance of
Sunday, as in other merely moral mat-
ters. But when the weather was good
there were usually to be found about the
stables a group of young men and wo-
men, preparing for tete-a-tete rides or
practicing jumps at the stone wall beside
the paddock. Later they would stroll
back to the club veranda for a cool drink,
and gossip until the church-going mem-
bers returned from the morning service,
and it was time to dress for luncheon.
Of the younger set Venetia Phillips
was most often to be found down by the
stone wall on a Sunday morning. She
had come home from Europe this last
time, handsome, tall, and fearless, thirsty
for excitement of all sorts, and had made
much talk in the soberer circles of subur-
ban society. She was a great lover of
dogs and horses, and went about followed
488
The Common Lot.
by a troop of lolloping dogs, — an im-
mense bull presented by an English ad-
mirer, and a wolf hound specially im-
ported, being the leaders of the pack.
She was one of the young women who
still played golf, now that it was no
longer fashionable, and on hot days she
might be seen on the links, her brown
arms bare to the shoulders, and a flood
of blue-black hair hanging down her
back. She rode to all the hunts, not ex-
cepting the early morning meets late in
the season. It was said, also, that she
drank too much champagne at the hunt
dinners, and allowed a degree of famil-
iarity to her admirers that shocked public
opinion in a respectable and censorious
society, which had found it hard to tol-
erate the mother.
Indeed, Mrs. Phillips could do nothing
with her ; she even confided her troubles
to Helen : " My. dear, the girl has had
every chance over there abroad, — we
had the very best introductions. She
spoiled it all by her idiocy. Stanwood
is making a fool of himself with a wo-
man, too. Enjoy your children, now,
while you can spank them when they are
naughty ! "
Helen, who had little enough sympathy
with the domestic tribulations of the rich,
remembered the widow's words the next
time she met Venetia at the stone wall
by the club stables, watching Lane, who
was trying a new hunter. Lane's temper
was notoriously bad ; the Kentucky horse
was raw and nervous ; he refused the
jump, almost throwing his rider. Lane,
too conscious of the spectators, his vanity
touched, beat the horse savagely on the
head.
" Low ! " Venetia grumbled audibly,
turning her back on the scene. " Come ! "
she said to Helen, seizing her arm.
" Have n't you had enough of brutes for
one morning ? Come up to the club and
have a talk. That 's the man madame
my mother thinks I am going to marry.
Do you suppose he 'd use the whip on his
wife ? "
They had the club veranda to them-
selves at that mid-morning hour. Vene-
tia flung herself into a chair, and flicked
the tips of her boots with her whip.
The small Francis, who had followed
his mother, tumbled on the grass with
the terrier Pete. Now and then Pete
would hobble to the veranda and look at
his mistress.
" You would n't marry that person,
would you ? Well ? You want to say
something disagreeable. You have had
it on your conscience for weeks. I could
see it in your eye. Spit it out, as the
boys say ! "
" Yes, I have had something on my
mind ! Why — why are you so " —
" You mean, why do I smoke ? drink
champagne ? and let men kiss me ? "
She laughed at the look of consterna-
tion on Helen's face.
"That's what you mean, isn't it?
My sporting around generally, and drink-
ing too much at that dinner last fall, and
supplying these veranda tabbies with so
much food for thought ? Why can't I be
the nice, sweet young woman you were
before you were married, eh ? A com-
fort to Mrs. Phillips and an ornament to
Forest Manor ! "
" You need n't be all that, and yet
strike a pleasanter note," the older wo-
man laughed back.
" My dear gray mouse, I'm lots worse
than that ! Do you know where I was
the other night when mamma was in such
a temper because I had n't come home,
and telephoned all around to the neigh-
bors ? "
" At the Bascoms' ? "
" Of course, all sweetly tucked up in
bed. Not a bit of it ! A lot of us had
dinner, and went to see a show, — that
was all on the square. But afterwards
Teddy Stewart and I did the Clark
Street levee, at one in the morning, and
quite by ourselves. We saw lots and
lots, — it was very informing ; I could tel
you heaps ; and it went all right unti
Teddy, like a little fool, got into troubl
The Common Lot.
489
at one of the places. Some one said some-
thing to me not quite refined, and Ted
was just enough elated to be on his dig-
nity. If we had n't had an awful piece
of luck, there would have been a little
paragraph in the paper the next morning.
Would n't that have made a noise ? "
" You little fool ! " groaned Helen.
" Oh ! I don't know," Venetia contin-
ued imperturbably. " Just as I had hold
of Ted and was trying to calm him down,
somebody hit him, and there was a gen-
eral scrap. He is n't so much of a fool
when he is all sober. Just then a man
grabbed me, and I found myself on the
street. It was — Well, no matter just
now who it was. Then the man went
back for Ted, and after a time he got
him, rather the worse for his experience.
We had to send him to a hotel, and then
the man saw me home to the Bascoms'.
My, what a talking he put up to me on
the way to the North Side ! "
She waited to see what effect she had
produced, but as Helen said nothing she
continued, —
"I suppose you are thinking I am a
regular little red devil. But you don't
know what girls do. I 've seen a lot of
girls all over. And most of 'em, if they
travel in a certain class, do just as fool
things as I do. On the quiet, you under-
stand, and most of them don't get into
trouble, either. They marry all right in
the end, and become quiet little mammas
like you, dear. Sometimes when they
are silly, or weak, or have bad luck,
there 's trouble. Now. I am not talking
loose, as Ted would say. I 've known
Baltimore girls, and New York girls, and
Philadelphia girls, and Boston girls, —
they 're the worst ever !
" Why should the women be so differ-
ent from the men, anyway ? They are
the same flesh and blood as their fathers
and brothers, and other girls' fathers and
brothers, too. . . . Don't make that face
at me ! I 'm nice, too, at least a little
nice. Did n't you ever sit here evenings,
or over at the Eversley Club, and watch
the nice little girls ? But perhaps you
could n't tell what it means. You ought
to get a few points from me or some
other girl who is next them. We could
tell you what they 've done ever since
they left school, day by day."
The small Francis was rolling over
and over on the green turf, rejoicing in
the pleasure of soiling his white suit.
Beyond the polo field a couple on horse-
back were passing slowly along the curv-
ing road into the woods. The cicadas
sang their piercing August song in the
shrubs. It was a drowsy, decorous scene.
" It is n't all like that," the older wo-
man protested. " Most of the men and
women you know, here in Chicago" —
" Oh yes ! They 're good out here, most
of 'em, and dull, damn dull. They 're
afraid to take off their gloves for fear it
isn't the correct thing. A lot of 'em
are n't used to their good clothes, like
that Mrs. Rainbow. As uncle says,
' Our best people are religious and moral.'
Chicago is too new to be real naughty,
and too busy, but wait a few years.
Meanwhile, there 's more going on than
you dream of, gray mouse ! "
" You are too wise, Venetia ! "
" I '11 tell you the reason why we
sport. We 're dull, and we are looking
for some fun. The men get all the excite-
ment they need, scrambling for money.
Girls want to be sports, too, and they
can't do the money act. So they sport
— otherwise. That 's the why."
She rapped the floor with her whip,
and laughed at Helen's perplexity.
" I want to be a real sport, and know
what men are like, really, when they are
off parade, as you nice women don't know
'em."
" Well, what are they like ? "
" Some beasts, some cads, some good
fellows," Venetia pronounced definitive-
ly. " Do you know why I let men kiss
me sometimes ? To see if they will, if
that sort of thing is all they want. And
most of 'em do want just that, married
or single. When a man has the chance,
490
The Common Lot.
why, he goes back to the ape mighty
quick."
She nodded sagely when Helen
laughed at her air of wisdom. Then
she continued serenely, —
" There are some of them now, com-
ing up from the paddock. They have
had their little Sunday stroll, and now
they want a drink to make them feel
cool and comfy, and some talk with the
ladies. We must trot out our prettiest
smiles and nicest talk, while they sit tight
and are amused."
"And so you think this is all, just
these women and men you see here and
in other places like this? And the mil-
lions and millions of others who are try-
ing to live decent lives, who work and
struggle ? "
" I talk of those I know, dearie.
What are the rest to me ? Just dull, or-
dinary people you never meet except on
the street or in the train. We are the top
of it all. ... I don't care for books and
all that sort of thing, or for slumming
and playing with the poor. If you knew
them, too, I guess you 'd find much the
same little game going on down there."
" What a horrid world ! "
" It is a bit empty," the girl yawned.
"I 'suppose the only thing, after you
have had your run, is to marry the de-
centest man you can find, who won't get
drunk, or spend your money, or beat
you, and have a lot of children. Yours
are awfully nice ! I 'd like to have the
kids without the husband, — only that
would make such a row ! "
" And that would please your mother,
to have you married ? "
" Oh, mother ! I suppose it would
please her to have me marry Mr. Ste-
phen Lane," Venetia answered coldly.
" One does n't talk about one's mother,
or I 'd like to tell you a thing or two on
that head. She need n't worry over me.
She 's had her fun, and is taking what
she can get now."
The group of men and women drew
near the clubhouse. Jackson stopped to
speak to a man who had just driven up.
Venetia pointed to him.
" There ! See Jackie, your good
man ? He 's buzzing old Pemberton,
that crusty pillar of society, because he 's
got a little game to play with him. You
must n't look so haughty, dear wife.
It 's your business, too, to be nice to old
Pemberton. I shall leave you when he
comes up, so that you can beguile him
with your sweet ways. It 's money in thy
husband's purse, mouse, and hence in thy
children's mouths. Now, if we women
could scramble for the dollars, — why,
we should n't want other kinds of mis-
chief. I 'd like to be a big broker, like
Rainbow, and handle deals, and make
the other fellows pay, pay, pay ! "
She swung the small Francis over her
head and tumbled him in the grass, to
the delight of Pete, who hobbled about
his mistress, yelping with joy.
There was something hard and final
in the girl's summary of her experience.
Vigorous, hot-blooded, and daring, Ve-
iietia would have battled among men as
an equal, and got from the fight for ex-
istence health, and sanity, and joy. As
it was, she was rich enough to be pro-
tected in the struggle for existence, and
was tied up by the prejudices of her
class. She was bottled passion !
The architect still held Pemberton
conversation on the drive, and Venetu
presently returned to Helen, smiling
ly into her face.
"That doctor man was an amusing
chap, was n't he ? I mean Dr. Cobui
the one who mended up Pete when I wa
a young miss, and outraged mamma
sending her a receipted bill for two hur
dred and fifty dollars. He asks aboi
you. Why did you drop him ? "
" Where have you seen him ?"
" Oh, here and there. Why not ? Ht
was the man who helped me out of tlu
scrape with Teddy. Would n't Jackie
let you have anything to do with him !
Jackie is an awful snob, you know."
The Common Lot.
491
« How is he ? "
" Just as always, — poor, down at the
heel and all over, an out-and-out crank."
" How do you meet him ? " Helen
asked pointedly.
"Sometimes at his hang-out, as he
calls it. I 've had supper there once or
twice with Molly Bascom. You need n't
be alarmed. We talk science, and he
abuses doctors. He trundled off to Paris
or Vienna with that queer machine of
his, and got some encouragement. You
should hear him talk about Europe !
Now he 's crazy about some new scheme.
He may not make good, but he has a
great time thinking all by himself. He 'd
starve himself to do what he 's after.
That 's the real thing. I offered him
money once ! "
" Venetia ! "
" Yes. I said, ' See here, friend,
I 've more of this than I want,' which
was a lie. But I was willing to sell a
horse or two. ' Help yourself,' I said.
I put a cardcase I had with me on the
table, stuffed of course. He took it up,
took out what was in it, and put the case
back. ' None of that/ he said. ' I don't
take money from a woman,' and he
handed the money back. I was glad
afterwards that he did, though he looked
specially hard up. I suppose I might
have taken a nicer way to do it, but I
thought he would understand and treat
me like a little girl, as he always has. . . .
Well, there comes Jackson, at last."
She gave the architect a hand, which
he shook with mock impressiveness.
" How do, Jackie ! I Ve been cor-
rupting your angel."
It was evident that she and Jackson
understood each other very well.
XV.
The Harts were to dine at the Stew-
arts', and Jackson Hart had considered
this dinner of sufficient importance to
bring him back to Chicago all the way
from Indianapolis. Elisha Stewart made
his money many years ago, when he
commanded a vessel on the lakes, by
getting control of valuable ore proper-
ties. The Elisha Stewarts had lived in
Shoreham for many years, and were
much considered, — very good people,
indeed. Their rambling, old-fashioned
white house, with a square cupola pro-
jecting from the roof, was one of the vil-
lage landmarks. It was surrounded by
a grove of firs set out by Elisha himself
when he built the house.
It was a large dinner, and most of the
guests were already assembled in the long
drawing-room when Helen and Jackson
arrived. The people were all talking
very earnestly about a common topic.
" It 's the Crawfords," Mrs. Stewart
murmured asthmatically into Helen's
ear. " You know they find everything
in a frightful tangle. There won't be
much left."
" Indeed ! " Jackson exclaimed sym-
pathetically.
" He was n't all right, not fit for busi-
ness for more than a year before he
died," Colonel Raymond was saying to
the group. " And he snarled things up
pretty well by what I hear."
" That slide in copper last March must
have squeezed him ! "
" Squeezed ? I should say it did."
" It was n't only copper."
" No, no, it was n't only copper," as-
sented several men.
With the women, the more personal^
application of the fact was openly made.
" Poor old Anthony ! It must have
troubled him to know there was n't one
of his family who could look out for
himself. Morris was a pleasant fellow,
but after he got out of Harvard he never
seemed to do much. It will come hard
on Linda."
" What has the youngest boy been up
to lately ? "
" The same thing, I guess."
"I heard he 'd been doing better since
he went on the ranch."
492
The Common Lot.
" He could n't do very much else
there."
" Is n't there anything left ? "
" Oh, the widow will have a little.
But the sons-in-law will have to hunt
jobs. One is out in California, isn't
he?"
The company could not get away from
the topic. After they went out to din-
ner, it echoed to and fro around the
table.
" I say it 's a shame, a crime ! " Mr.
Buchanan pronounced. " A man with
that sort of family has no right to en-
gage in speculative enterprises without
settling a proper sum on his family first.
There 's his eldest daughter married to
an invalid, his youngest daughter en-
gaged to be married to a parson, and
neither of his sons showing any business
ability."
" That 's a fact, Oliver," Mr. Stewart
nodded. " But you know Anthony al-
ways loved deep water."
"And now his family have got to
swim in it ! "
"He was a most generous man,"
Pemberton threw into the conversation.
" I hardly know of a man who 's done
more first and last for this town."
" Seems to have looked after other
people's affairs better 'n his own. It 's
a pity now the boys were n't brought up
to business."
" That is n't the way nowadays."
From time to time there were feeble
.efforts to move the talk out of the rut
in which it had become fixed. But the
minds of most about the table were fas-
cinated by the spectacle of ruin so close-
ly presented to them. The picture of a
solid, worldly estate crumbling before
their eyes stirred their deepest emotions.
For the moment it crowded out that
other great topic of the strike in the
building trades. Everyone at the table
held substantially the same views on both
these matters, but the ruin of the Craw-
ford fortune was more immediately dra-
matic than the evils of unionism.
" When are you fellows going to st
that school, judge ? " some one asked at
last.
" Not until these strikes let up, and
there 's no telling when that will be. If
these labor unions only keep on long
enough, they will succeed in killing every
sort of enterprise."
Pemberton, who was seated next to
Helen, remarked to her, —
" You will be glad to know, Mrs. Hart,
that the trustees have decided not to
hand the work over to any institution,
at least for the present."
" I am so glad of that ! " she replied.
" That 's as far as we have got ! "
Sensitively alive to her former blunder
in expressing her wish that her husband
might draw the plans for the school, she
took this as a hint, and dropped the sub-
ject altogether, although she had a dozen
questions to ask him about it.
She noticed that Jackson, who was
seated between Mrs. Stewart and Mrs.
Phillips, was drinking a good deal of
champagne. She thought that he was
finding the dinner as intolerably dull as
she found it, for he rarely drank cham-
pagne. When the women gathered in the
drawing-room, the topic of the Craw-
fords' disaster had reached the anecdotal
" Poor Linda ! Do you remember
how she hated Chicago ? She 's been
living at Cannes this season, has n't she ?
I suppose she '11 come straight home now.
Does she own that place in the Berk-
shires ? "
" No, everything was in his name."
" He was one of the kind who would
keep everything in his own hands."
" Even that ranch does n't belong to
Ted."
" My, what a tragedy it is ! "
Helen sat limply in her chair. There
seemed to be no end to the talk of the
lost money. The leaden dullness of the
dinner-talk, the dead propriety and con-
ventionality of the service, the dishes,
the guests, had never before so whelmed
The Common Lot.
493
her spirit as they did to-night. These
good people were stung into unusual ani-
mation because a man had died leaving
his family, not poor, but within sight of
poverty, for poverty is the deadliest spec-
tre to haunt the bourgeois, at his lying
down and at his uprising !
When the men returned, murmuring
among themselves fragments of the same
topic, she felt as though she might shriek
out or laugh hysterically, and as soon as
she could she clutched her husband as
he was sitting down beside Mrs. Pem-
berton.
"Take me away, Francis. It 's awful,"
she whispered.
" What 's the matter ? Don't you feel
well ? "
" Yes, yes, I am all right. But can't
we get away ? "
As they got into their carriage, he de-
manded, " What was the matter ? "
" Nothing, — just the awful dullness of
it, — such people, — such talk, talk, talk
about poor Mr. Crawford's money ! "
" I thought the crowd was all right,"
he grumbled. " What better do you
want ? "
Then they were silent, and from the
heat, fatigue, and champagne, he re-
lapsed into a doze on the way home.
But when they reached the house he
woke up briskly enough, and began to
talk of the dinner again : —
"Nell, Mrs. Phillips was speaking to
me about Venetia. She 's worried to
death over the girl. The men say pretty
rough things about her. Little fool !
She 'd better marry Lane and keep
quiet."
" Like mother, like daughter," Helen
replied dryly.
" What makes you say that ? Louise
is all right ; just likes to have her hand
squeezed now and then."
" Phew ! " Helen exclaimed impa-
tiently.
There was something so short and
hard in his wife's voice that Jackson
looked at her in surprise. They went
to their dressing-room ; now that he had
got his eyes open once more Jackson
made no haste to go to bed. He lit a
cigarette, and leaned back against the
open window, through which the night
air was drawing gently. After a little
time he remarked, —
" The judge was talking some about
the school. They are getting ready to
build as soon as the strikes let up. Has
Everett said anything to you about it ? "
" Not lately. I have n't seen him
since we were at the Buchanans'.
Why?"
" Why ! I am counting on Everett,
and the last time I saw him he seemed
to me to be side-stepping. I 've seen
Pemberton once or twice, but he avoided
the subject. I asked him point blank
to-night what their plans were, and he
said the papers had everything that had
been settled. He 's a stiff one ! I saw
you were talking to him. Did he say
anything about the school ? "
Helen, who had been moving about
the room here and there, preparing to
undress, suddenly stood quite still. The
memory of her remark to Pemberton
that morning on the train swept over
her again, coloring her cheeks. She an-
swered the question after a moment of
hesitation, —
" Yes, he spoke about their not giving
the money to the university, but that was
all."
" Oh ! " Jackson murmured in a dis-
appointed tone. " You might have drawn
him out. He 's likely to have a good
deal to say about what is done. The
judge is down on me, never liked me
since I built for Louise, — thinks I stuck
her, I suppose. Was n't his money,
though ! Hollister is on the fence ; he '11
do what Everett tells him. It rests on
Pemberton, mostly."
Helen turned toward where he was
standing and asked swiftly, " Why do
you want them to give it to you so
much ? "
" Why ? " The architect opened his
494
The Common Lot.
mouth in astonishment. " Don't you
know the size of the thing ? They 're
going to spend a million or more, put up
one large building or several smaller ones.
It 's a chance that does n't come every
week, to do a great public building."
She had begun to unhook her dress,
and her nervous fingers tangled the lace
about the hooks. Jackson, seeing her
predicament, put down his cigarette and
stepped forward to help her. But she
swerved away from him unconsciously,
tugging at the lace until it broke loose
from the hook.
" Francis ! " she exclaimed, with a
kind of solemnity. " You would not do
it for money, just like any ordinary build-
ing?"
" And why not ? " he asked, puzzled.
" Am I drawing plans for fun these
days ? I '11 tell you what, Nell, I need
the money, and I need it badly. Some-
thing must turn up and right away.
Since the strikes began there has n't
been much new business coming into the
office, of course, and it costs us a lot to
live as we do. That 's plain enough."
" We can live differently."
" Yes, but I don't want to. That 's
nonsense ! "
They were silent for a little while be-
fore their unfinished thoughts. He broke
the silence first : —
" Perhaps I ought to tell you that I Ve
been caught in an — investment, some
stocks I bought. A friend of mine ad-
vised me, a broker who is in with Rain-
bow. But the thing went wrong. I
don't believe those fellows know as much
as the man outside ! Well, instead of
making a good thing by it, I must find
ten or fifteen thousand dollars and find
it mighty quick. Now if I get this com-
mission, I can borrow the money all
right. I know who will let me have it.
And then by the end of the year it will
straighten out. And the next time I go
to buy stocks, well " —
" But that building, — the school ? "
Helen interrupted. She pulled a thin
dressing-sacque over her shoulders, and
sat down on the edge of the bed, looking
breathlessly into his face. What he had
said about his losses in the stock market
had made no impression on her. " That
work is uncle Powers's gift, his legacy to
the people. You can't make money out
of it ! "
" Why not ? " he demanded shortly,
and then added, with a dry little laugh,
" I should say that building rather than
any other ! I 'd like to pick up a few
crumbs from the old man's cake. It 's
only common justice, seeing he did me
out of all the rest."
She stared at him with bewildert
eyes. Perhaps she was not a very quic
woman, if after five years of daily cor
tact with her husband she did not kno\
his nature. But the conceptions she
cherished of him were too deep to be
faced at once. She could not yet ui
derstand what he meant.
" ' Did you out of all the rest ' ? "
queried in a low voice.
" Yes ! " he exclaimed hardily. " Ai
I think the trustees should take it int
consideration that I did n't contest the
will, when I had the best kind of case
and could have given them no end of
trouble. I was a fool to knuckle under
so quickly. I might at least have had
an agreement with them about this mat-
ter ! "
" So," she said, " you want to build
the school to make up what you think
uncle should have given you ? "
" You need n't put it just like that !
But I need every cent I can make. The
bigger the building the better for me !
And I can do it as well for them as
anybody. They 're probably thinking of
having a competition, and having in a lot
of fellows from New York and Boston.
They ought to keep it in this city, any-
way, and then the only man I 'd hate to
run up against would be Wright. He 's
got some mighty clever new men in his
office."
He talked on as he stripped off his
The Common Lot.
495
coat and waistcoat and hung them neatly
on the clothes-tree, detailing all the con-
sideration he had given to his chances for
securing this big commission. Evidently
he had been turning it over and over in
his mind, and he was desperately ner-
vous lest he might lose what he had
counted on all along ever since his mar-
riage. He refrained from telling his
wife that he felt she had seconded him
feebly in this matter ; for she knew the
judge, and Pemberton, and Everett, too,
in a way better than he did.
Helen said nothing. There was no-
thing in her surprised and grieved heart
to be said. For the first time she knew
clearly what manner of man her husband
was. She knew how he felt about his
uncle. He was vindictive about him,
and seemed to welcome this job as a
chance to get even with the old man for
slighting him in his will. For some rea-
son unknown to her he had not tried at
the time of his death to break his will
and show his ingratitude, and now he
was sorry that he had displayed so much
forbearance.
This sudden sight of the nakedness of
the man she loved dulled her heart so
that she could not view the thing simply.
It was impossible for her to see that
there was nothing very dreadful in his
attitude, nothing more than a little or-
dinary human selfishness, sharpened by
that admirable system of civilized self-
interest, which our philosophers and
statesmen take such delight in praising !
She had been dreaming of her husband's
designing this great building as a testi-
monial, a monument of gratitude, to the
man who had succored his youth, who
had given him his education. Her sen-
timent turned rancid in her heart.
" Now, if Everett should say anything
to you, give you a chance, you know
what it means to me ! " Jackson re-
marked finally, as he put his boots out-
side the door for the man to get in the
morning.
But she had already stepped back into
the dressing-room, and did not hear him.
When she returned her husband was al-
ready in bed, and his eyelids were closed
in sleep. She placed herself beside him
and turned out the light.
She lay there a long, long time, her
open eyes staring upwards into the dark-
ness, her arms stretched straight beside
her, as she used to lie when she was a little
child and her nurse had told her not to
stir. Something strange had happened
that day, something impalpable, unnam-
able, yet true, and of enormous impor-
tance to the woman. The man who lay
there beside her, her husband, the indi-
visible part of her, had been suddenly
cut from her soul, and was once more
his own flesh, — some alien piece of clay,
and ever so to be !
She did not cry or moan. She was
stunned. All the little, petty manifes-
tations of character, unobserved through
those five years of marriage, were sud-
denly numbered and revealed to her. It
was not a question of blame. They de-
clared themselves to her as finalities, just
as if she had suddenly discovered that
her husband had four toes instead of
five. He was of his kind, and she was
of her kind. Being what she was, she
could no longer worship him, being what
he was. And her nature craved the
privilege of worship. That thin, color-
less protestantism of her fathers had
faded into a nameless moralism. She
had no Christ before whom she could
pour her adoration and love ! Instead,
she had taken to herself a man ; and
now the clay of his being was crumbling
in her hands. . . .
Outside the room the lake began to
clamor on the sands beneath the bluff.
It called her by its insistent moan. She
left her bed and stepped out upon the lit-
tle balcony that looked eastward from
their bedroom. The warm night was
filled with a damp mist that swathed the
tree trunks to their branches, and cov-
ered the slow moving waves of the lake.
Through this earth fog there was mov-
496
Moral Overstrain.
ing a current from some distant point,
touching the sleeping village.
She held her arms out to the mist,
vaguely, blindly, — demanding some
compensation for living, some justifica-
tion that she knew not of. And there in
the vigil of the misty night the woman
was born. From a soft, yielding, dream-
ing, feminine thing, there was born a
new soul, — definite, hard, and precise
in its judgment of men and life. . . .
In the house behind her slept her
husband and her two boys. Her chil-
dren and his ! But only in the words
of the sentimentalists are children a suf-
ficient joy to woman's heart. Loving
as she was by nature, she asked more of
life than her two boys, whose little lives
no longer clung to hers by the bonds of
extreme infancy. They were growing
to become men ; they, too, like her hus-
band, would descend into the market for
the game which all men play. The fear
of it gripped her heart !
And at last she wept, miserably, for
the forlorn wreck of her worship, think-
ing of the glorious man she had once
adored.
The next morning she said to her hus-
band, —
" Francis, I want to live in the city
this winter."
" Well, — there 's time to think of it,
— you may change your mind by the
fall."
She said no more, but the first step
had been taken.
Robert Herrick.
(To be continued.)
MORAL OVERSTRAIN.
IN mechanics it is part of the engi-
neer's profession to consider carefully
the amount of physical weight and pres-
sure which various substances will bear,
— how many pounds a given girder will
sustain ; how much an upright. It is
upon this science and its carefully fig-
ured mathematical details that the safety
and well-being of the housed communi-
ty so largely depend. Sometimes, to be
sure, even the most carefully estimated
plans are spoiled by some unforeseen and
unforeseeable weakness in the structural
material, and it gives way at a pres-
sure or strain apparently none too great
for its endurance. But these occasional
obsessions of inanimate nature do not
discourage the engineer, or make him
abandon his interminable mathematics.
In spite of them, or rather on account
of them, he continues his studies so that
he may better succeed in placing on
the materials which he uses no grievoi
burden, and may not subject them
a stress or strain forbidden by nature
law. Collapses of buildings are less fr
quent, and community life becomes safer
as this expert knowledge, founded or
study and experience, grows broader anc
surer.
It is rather a sad thing, when one
thinks of it, that the field of this sor
of mathematics has such definite limit
tions, and that we cannot by mathemat
ical formulae calculate moral stress ar
strain, and ascertain how far we
safely go in placing burdens on
characters of those with whom we dc
business, or of those with whom we ha\
social intercourse. Consider, for exs
pie, the great court calendars in tl
large cities. How many thousands
those cases, formal announcements
men at war with one another, or of sc
Moral Overstrain.
497
ciety itself at war with the individual,
are really nothing more or less than
examples of the unfortunate results of
moral overstrain. One man has placed
too great a burden on the moral strength
of another, and there has been a break or
a total collapse. And when that collapse
comes, note the difference in the proced-
ure which follows. As soon as the build-
ing wall cracks, or at the first observable
indication of insecurity of foundation,
the builder's first thought is to preserve
the building, to relieve the strain on the
weak spot, to strengthen its supports,
and to reinforce its foundation. There
has been no corresponding practice yet
devised which may be taken when the
moral crash comes and a business man's
character goes to pieces, or when a thief
or murderer is brought to the bar of
criminal justice. There is no " jacking-
up " process for overstrained morals to
be found in the law courts.
We take philosophically enough the
daily moral breakdown of our fellow
men, and do not ordinarily complain to
Providence against our inability to as-
certain with mathematical certainty the
extent of the confidence we can safely
repose in the people with whom we have
intercourse. It has always been so and
always will be. We cannot apply mathe-
matics to human conduct. The Fidel-
ity insurance corporations which have
sprung up within recent years have, to be
sure, their systems based on experience
for estimating moral hazards ; and they
have curious and exceedingly interesting
theories of moral probabilities by which,
for example, they estimate the chances
of defalcation by an employee in a given
employment in which given opportunities
for wrong-doing are not counterbalanced
by certain systems of inspection or super-
vision. These corporations and a few
large financial institutions apparently
recognize the necessity of considering
moral risks somewhat in the way in
which the engineer estimates as to the
girder, — how he can make it perform its
VOL. xcin. — NO. 558. 32
useful functions in a house without being
broken down by overstrain and bringing
calamity with its fall. The method of
the financial institutions in dealing with
this question deserves a study by itself.
Their method involves, generally, in its
application to subordinate employees, a
complex and carefully studied business
system filled with " checks and bal-
ances," with frequent inspections and
examinations, which are intended to
reduce the opportunity for successful
wrong-doing to a minimum. The pay of
the minor employees of a banking house
who handle fortunes daily is, as a rule,
pitifully small, showing a conscious pur-
pose in these institutions of relying prin-
cipally upon a practical certainty of de-
tection, coupled with a remorseless and
relentless severity in prosecution and
punishment, as a relief for the severe
moral strain upon employees whose op-
portunities and temptations for wrong-
doing are, from the nature of the employ-
ment, large.
Outside of these financial institutions
and these Fidelity insurance corpora-
tions, there seems to be in practical
operation no rational system for estimat-
ing or relieving the strain upon morals
which business life necessarily involves.
Outside of this narrow group the only
theory which seems current is one based
upon a generality, the fallacy in which
receives almost daily demonstration, and
yet one which is firmly fixed in the pub-
lic mind. It is a theory which is as far
as possible the absolute opposite of that
upon which the engineer deals with the
question of strain and stress in mechan-
ics. This theory, curiously enough, has
a quasi-religious origin. It is based upon
that duty of faith concerning which we
hear so much in this generation. We
are realizing now, as no previous gen-
eration has realized, the importance and
power of the element of faith, both to
our happiness and to our capacity for
usefulness. The word itself is a noble
oue, and has the greatest importance, not
498
Moral Overstrain.
solely in its connection with the unre-
vealed part of religion, but with our
daily work in business as well. It is cer-
tain that we must have faith in our fel-
low men. It is undoubtedly true that
one of the worst misfortunes, as well as
one of the most singular marks of weak-
ness and incapacity in either man or
woman, is the absence of faith and the
habit of suspicion. As Lord Bacon well
said : " Suspicions amongst thoughts are
like bats among birds. They ever
thrive by twilight. Certainly they are
to be repressed, or at least well guard-
ed, for they crowd the mind, they lose
friends, and they check with business,
whereby business cannot go on currently
and constantly."
It is undoubtedly true that faith itself
is something essential to the happiness of
mankind, whether one considers it as in-
cluding faith in God, or in man, or in
both. Our great men, both in public and
private life, have been men who had
trust and faith in their fellows. It cannot
be too often repeated that this element
of faith is one of the strongest and finest
of those unseen particles which go to
build up the highest type of character.
But, as La Rochefoucauld says, " the
truth has not done so much good in the
world as the appearance of truth has done
evil." The trouble with this constant it-
eration in these days of the necessity for
us to have faith in our fellows is that it
fails to note the necessary and logical
limitations of the doctrine. The engineer
or builder may have faith in a span or
girder he uses, but he does not for that
reason allow an unlimited pressure to fall
upon it. On the other hand, the rule of
faith which is commonly preached to us
from the pulpit is generally based upon
the assumption that faith itself has the
unique quality or power of creating
strength where it puts pressure, and that
the rules of natural or physical law can-
not be applied in this regard to the un-
seen structural materials of the spiritual
world. How many times, for example,
have we all heard, in one form or another,
the pathetic anecdote of the malefactor
turned from his projected crime by some
one trusting him, or of the criminal placed
with a full opportunity of crime imme-
diately before him, with escape practical-
ly certain, who has been deterred from
his evil purpose simply by the moral force
which the trust and confidence of another
have created in him.
This illustration of the power of faith
is one used most frequently by persons
whose understanding of spiritual matters
and things of God far overbalances their
judgment and their practical insight into
human character. It is a very beautiful
story when well told, and we all have
sentimental sides to our natures to which
it appeals. But while these occasional
cases may and undoubtedly do exist, a
theory of conduct based on them is
scarcely less foolish than for the reader
of sentimental novels to assume that in
the world of men truth crushed to earth
always rises uninjured, and that virtue
always triumphs in the last chapter.
A doctrine, the precise opposite to this
rule of faith, I heard as it was laid down
impressively some years ago by a great
criminal jurist. His long daily experi-
ence on the bench with human weakness,
while it had enlarged his great natural
insight into character and motive, had
neither soured him nor made him cyni-
cal. He, certainly, could speak on the
subject of moral strain with the voice of
authority. It was in the old court of
Oyer and Terminer in New York, and
Recorder Smyth had just passed sentence
on a young man who had been convicted
of robbery in snatching a watch from
lady in the shopping district of Sixtl
Avenue. It was in the fall of 1892,
when times were hard, and the streel
and park benches were filled with gaun
hungry-faced creatures, out of work an<
full of misery. This lady had been shop-
ping all day long in streets thronged wii
these people, Avearing a small jewel
watch attached by a chatelaine to h
Moral Overstrain.
499
dress. This young man, who was scarce-
ly more than a boy, had seen the watch,
and, snatching it, had attempted to escape
in the crowd, when he was caught. Af-
ter the Recorder had passed sentence,
sending this young fellow to penal servi-
tude, he turned and addressed a few re-
marks to the prosecutrix, who stood near
the bar, weeping sympathetically, and
mopping up her copious tears with her
handkerchief. The tears were even more
copious, though from different emotions,
when the judge had finished. " Mad-
am," he said, " it is one of the great de-
fects of the criminal law that it has no
adequate punishment for those who incite
their fellows to crime. If it were in my
power to do so, I can assure you I should
feel it a pleasanter duty to impose an even
severer sentence than the one I have just
rendered, on the vain woman who parades
up and down the crowded streets of this
city, filled as they are to-day with hun-
gry people, wearing ostentatiously on her
dress, insecurely fastened, a glittering
gewgaw like this, tempting a thousand
hungry men to wrong-doing. There are,
in my judgment, two criminals involved
in this matter, and I sincerely regret that
the law permits me to punish only one of
them."
These rather caustic remarks of the
old Recorder have a much broader scope
than merely an application to the women
who love to display costly finery. How
many thousands of business men there
are who manage their affairs in slipshod,
slovenly fashion, and who complain bit-
terly of the abuse of the " perfect confi-
dence " which they have reposed in their
employees. My own notion of this " per-
fect confidence " is that in ninety cases
out of a hundred it is not genuine confi-
dence at all, but a mere excuse for busi-
ness shif tlessness or lack of system. The
law relating to actions for personal in-
juries provides that a man whose body
has been injured by the carelessness of
another must, in order to entitle him to
claim damages, prove not only that care-
lessness, but also his own freedom from
negligence contributing to or causing the
injury. If every business man who suf-
fers from a defaulting employee were
obliged to prove not only the employee's
crime, but the absence of substantial busi-
ness carelessness on his own part, which
afforded both the opportunity and the
temptation for the offense, how few con-
victions of these defaulters there would
be ! It is a great misfortune that those
who speak so eloquently and so often on
the duty of " faith in man," and who ex-
pound this doctrine as though it had no
limitations or qualifications whatever, do
not devote at least a substantial portion
of their attention to expounding earnest-
ly the equally important duty which each
man owes his fellow of not throwing un-
necessary moral stumbling-blocks in his
way. It is curious that almost the only
u temptation " which receives any par-
ticular attention from moralists, either in
the pulpit or elsewhere, is that occasioned
by one man offering spirituous beverages
to another who may be inclined to in-
dulge in potations to excess. By some
odd distortion of moral values the custom
of " treating " has been singled out as
though it were the greatest or most im-
portant of those actions or omissions
by which we cause our neighbors or em-
ployees to offend. Whoever heard a ser-
mon or lecture on the duty of keeping
reasonably strict oversight on one's em-
ployees, or on the duty of having a busi-
ness system which shall reduce the op-
portunities of dishonesty to a minimum ?
The duty of not putting on the character
of another a greater burden than it can
safely bear is as important as any duty
in the realm of morals, and the matter of
temperance is only one branch of it, and
by no means the most important. An
examination of the daily criminal calen-
dars in the courts of the large cities con-
clusively proves this fact. In early days,
when property was mainly in land or its
products, and when business life moved
more slowly than it does in these flush
500
Invocation.
times, the temptations and opportunities
for crimes against property were far less
frequent. We are not essentially a sys-
tematic people. Our tendency is to do
business on as large a scale as possi-
ble, without that care to detail which is
exhibited in the more cumbrous busi-
ness methods of countries in which the
margins of profit are narrower, and
where commercial transactions are not
conducted with the astonishing rapidity
which characterizes our own. To a large
extent these defects in system are more
or less necessary and inherent to these pe-
culiar methods and habits of our business
life. They are nevertheless defects, and
should not be so consistently ignored and
overlooked as they have been generally
in the past. We are paying greater at-
tention yearly to the physical discom-
forts of the worker, trying to relieve the
overburdened, and to lighten the load of
hard work which has fallen so heavily in
our struggle for commercial supremacy,
particularly on the women and children.
This is all excellent, but we must remem-
ber that we have no more right to over-
load a man's morals than his back, and
that while it is a duty as well as a privi-
lege to have faith in our fellows, we
should temper that faith with common
sense, so that our faith may be to them a
help and a support rather than a stum-
bling-block and a cause of offense.
George W. Alger.
INVOCATION.
BLOWN mist of rosy grasses,
Into my singing drift ;
Kindle its cloven masses
With lights that sway and shift ;
Within its dark impasses
Your fairy torches lift.
Brown rill through rushes wending,
Where red-wings flash and dip,
Lend me the rhythm bending
Each dark reed's yellowing tip, —
The pause, the swift ascending,
The careless slide and slip.
Into my plodding measure
Your least enchantment fling,
Earth of the winds' wild pleasure
And leaves' soft jargoning :
Yield me but one hid treasure,
Then listen while I sing !
Gertrude Buck.
Lugging Boat on iSowadnehunk.
501
LUGGING BOAT ON SOWADNEHUNK.
THIS is a Penobscot story.
When the camp-fire is lighted, and the
smoke draws straight up without baffling,
and the branches overhead move only as
the rising current of heat fans them, then
if the talk veers round to stories of crack
watermen, and the guides, speaking more
to each other than to you, declare that
it was Big Sebattis Mitchell who first ran
the falls at Sowadnehunk, — though full
twenty years before John Ross himself
had put a boat over and come out right
side up, — do not, while they are debat-
ing whose is the credit of being first, let
slip your chance to hear a better tale :
bid them go on and tell you how it was
Joe Attien, who was Thoreau's guide,
and his men who followed after and who
failed, that made the day memorable.
And if your guides are Penobscot men
they will tell it as Penobscot men should,
as if there were no merit in the deed be-
yond what any man might attain to, as
if the least a man should do was to throw
away his life on a reckless dare, and count
it well spent when so lavished. For so
are these men made, and as it was in
those days of the beginning, so is it yet
even to the present among us.
You will have heard, no doubt, of Se-
battis, he who from his bulk was called
by the whites Big Sebat, and from his
lazy shrewdness was nicknamed by his
tribesmen Ahwassus, the Bear. Huge
and round he was, like the beast he was
named for, but strong and wise, and in
his dark, flat face and small, twinkling
eyes there were resources, ambitions,
schemes.
And scores of you who read this will
recollect the place. In memory you will
again pass down the West Branch in your
canoe, past Ripogenus, past Ambeje-
mackomas, past the Horse Race, into
the welcome deadwater above Nesowad-
nehunk. There, waiting in expectancy
for that glorious revelation of Katahdin
which bursts upon you above Abol, that
marvelous picture of the giant tower-
ing in majestic isolation, with its white
" slide " ascending like a ladder to the
heavens, you forgot yourself, did not
hear the tumult of falling waters, did
not see the smooth lip of the fall suck-
ing down, were unconscious that just be-
fore you were the falls of Sowadnehunk.
Then, where the river veers sharply to
the right, you felt the guide spring on
his paddle as he made the carry by a
margin, and you realized what it would
have been to drift unguided over those
falls.
So it has always been, the sharp bend
of the river to the right, blue, smooth,
dazzling; the carry at the left, bare, broad,
yellow-earthed. Crossing it forty rods,
you cut off the river again, and see above
you to the right the straight fall, both
upper and lower pitches almost as sheer
as mi 11 dams, and in front the angry boil of
a swift current among great and thick-
set rocks. So it always stays in memory,
— at one end the blue river, smooth and
placid, and the yellow carry ; at the other,
the white hubbub of tossing rapids below
perpendicular falls.
One May day long ago, two boats-
crews came down to the carry and lugged
across. They had lugged three miles on
Ripogenus, and a half mile on Ambeje
mackomas, besides the shorter carry past
Chesuncook Dam; they had begun to
know what lugging a boat meant. The
day was hot, — no breeze, no shade ; it
was getting along toward noon, and they
had turned out, as usual, at three in the
morning. They were tired, — tired, faint,
hot •, weary with the fatigue that stiffens
the back and makes the feet hang heavy j
weary, too, with the monotony of weeks
of dangerous toil without a single day
of rest, the weariness that gets upon the
502
Lugging Boat on Sowadnehunk.
brain and makes the eyes go blurry ;
weary because they were just where they
were, and that old river would keep flow-
ing on to Doomsday, always drowning
men and making them chafe their shoul-
ders lugging heavy boats. There was not
a man of them who could not show upon
his shoulder a great red spot where the
pole used in lugging boat, or the end of
an oar on which barrels of pork or flour
had been slung in carrying wangun, had
bruised and abraded it. And now it was
more lugging, and ahead were Abol and
Pockwockamus and Debsconeag and Am-
bejijis and Fowler's and — there are, in-
deed, how many of them ! The over-
weary always add to the present burden
that mountain of future toil.
So it was in silence that they took out
the oars and seats, the paddles and pea-
vies and pickaroons, drew the boats up
and drained them of all water, then, rest-
ing a moment, straightened their backs,
rubbed the sore shoulders that so soon
must take up the burden again, and ran
their fingers through their damp hair.
One or two swore a little as relieving
their minds, and when they bent to lift
the boat one spoke for all the others.
" By jinkey-boy ! " said he, creating a
new and fantastic oath, " but I do believe
I 'd rather be in hell to-day, with ninety
devils around me, than sole-carting on
this carry."
That was the way they all felt. It is
mighty weary business to lug on carries.
For a driving boat is a heavy lady to
carry. The great Maynards, wet, weigh
eight to nine hundred pounds, and they
put on twelve men, a double crew, to
carry one. The old two-streakers (that
is, boats with two boards to a side where
the big Maynards had three) were not
nearly so heavy, and on short carries
like Sowadnehunk were lugged by their
own crews, whether of four men or six ;
but diminishing the crew left each man
with as great a burden. A short man
at the bow, another at the stern, with
the taller ones amidships under the
curve of the gunwale if they were lug-
ging without poles, or by twos fore, aft,
and amidships for six men lugging with
poles, was the usual way they carried
their boats ; and it was '* Steady, boys,
steady ; now hoist her ! " — " Easy, now,
easy ; hold hard ! " for going down hill
she overrode John and Jim at the bow,
and going up a rise Jack and Joe at the
stern felt her crushing their shoulders,
and when the ground was uneven with
rocks and cradle-knolls, and she reeled
and sagged, then the men at the sides
caught the whole weight on one or the
other of them. Nothing on the drive
speaks so eloquently of hard work as
the purple, sweat-stained cross on the
backs of the men's red shirts, where
the suspenders have made their mark ;
they get this in lugging boat on carries.
But they bent their backs to it, wrig-
gled the boat up and forward to her
place, each crew its own boat, and stag-
gered on, feet bracing out, and spike-
soled shoes ploughing the dirt and scratch-
ing on the rocks. They looked like huge
hundred-leggers, Brobdingnagian insects,
that were crawling over that yellow carry
with all their legs clawing uncertainly
and bracing for a foothold. The head
boat crowded Bill Halpin upon a rock
hard that he fell and barked his shins >
the granite ; that dropped the weight sud-
denly upon Jerry Durgan's shoulder, so
that a good two inches of skin was rasped
off clean where it had been blistered be-
fore ; little Tomah Soc stumbled in a
hole, and not letting go his grip, threw
up the other gunwale so that it half
broke his partner's jaw. Those boats
took all the mean revenges wherewith a
driving boat on land settles scores for
the rough treatment it receives in the
water.
They were lugging that May morning
only because no boat could run those
falls with any reasonable expectation of
coming out right side up. For those
were the days of the old-style Wallace
Lugging Boat on Sowadnehunk.
503
boat, built low and straight in the gun-
wale, raking only moderately at the bow
and low in the side. It is related that
when the great high -bo wed Maynard
batteaus were first put on the river, short
old Jack Mann, who wore the laurels of
senior waterman on Penobscot, and was
pensioned in his latter days by " P. L. D.,"
looked with high disfavor on the big,
handsome craft, and then, rushing into
the boat-shop, demanded an axe, an au-
ger, and a handsaw.
" What 's that for ? " asked the fore-
man, suspecting that it was but one of
Jack's devices for unburdening his mind
in some memorable saying.
" Want 'em to cut armholes in that
blasted boat," growled Jack, insinuating
that the bows were above the head of a
short man like himself.
But the old boat, — you may yet some-
times see the bones of one of them bleach-
ing about the shores of inland ponds, or
lying sun-cracked in the back yards of
country farms, — stable and serviceable
as she was, was no match for this hand-
some lady of to-day. They run the
Arches of Ripogenus now with all their
boats, and have done it for years ; but at
the time when Sebattis came down to
Sowadnehunk, such water no man ever
dreamed of running.. It is likely enough
that Sebattis, just back from a sixteen
years' residence at Quoddy,did not know
that it had ever been run successfully.
Be that as it may, when Sebattis and
his crew came down, the last of three
boats, and held their batteau at the tak-
ing - out place a moment before they
dragged her out and stripped her ready
to lug, what Sebattis, as he sat in the
stern with his paddle across his knees,
said in Indian to his bowman was simply
revolutionary.
" Huh ? " grunted his dark-faced part-
ner, turning in great surprise ; " you
fought you wanted run it dose e'er falls ?
Blenty rabbidge water dose e'er falls ! "
The bowman had stated the case con-
servatively. That carry was there merely
because men were not expected to run
those falls and come out alive.
But the bowman's objection was not
meant as a refusal : he knew Sebattis,
that he was a good waterman, few bet-
ter. A big, slow man, of tremendous
momentum when once in motion, it was
likely enough that all the years of his
exile at Quoddy he had been planning
just how he could run those falls, and if
he spoke now it was because this was the
hour striking. In his own mind he had
already performed the feat, and was re-
ceiving the congratulations of the crowd.
It was no small advantage that he knew
an audience of two boats' crews was
waiting at the lower carry-end to testify,
however grudgingly, to the authenticity
of what he claimed to have done.
The bowman had faith in Sebattis ;
as he listened to the smooth stream of
soft-cadenced Indian that cast silvery
bonds about his reluctance and left him
helpless to refuse (Sebattis being both an
orator in a public and a powerful pleader
in a private cause), the bowman caught
the rhythm of the deed. It was all so
easy to take their boat out into mid-
stream where the current favored them
a little, to shoot her bow far out over
the fall, and, as the crews ashore gaped
in horrified amazement, to make her
leap clear as a horse leaps a hurdle.
And then to fight their way through the
smother of the whirlpool below, man
against water, but such men as not every
boat can put in bow and stern, such
strong arms as do not hold every paddle,
such great heads for management, such
skill in water-craft as few attain.
This was the oration, with its Indian
appeal to personal glory. It was, as
Sebattis said, " Beeg t'ing" and he fired
his bowman with the desire for glory.
The Penobscot man, white man or In-
dian, dies with astonishing alacrity when
he sees anything worth dying for. And
the name of " crack waterman " is a
shining mark to strive for.
Thus at the upper end of the carry
604
Lugging Boat on Sowadnehunk.
Sebattis and his bowman talked over at
their leisure the chances of dying within
five minutes. At the other end the two
boats' crews lay among the blueberry
bushes in the shade of shivering birch
saplings and waited for Sebattis. It did
not worry them that he was long in com-
ing; they knew the leisurely Indian ways,
and how unwilling, though he weighed
hard upon two hundred and sixty, and
had strength to correspond, was Big Se-
battis to lug an extra pound. They pic-
tured him draining his boat and sopping
out with a swab of bracken the last dis-
pensable ounce of water, then, tilting her
to the sun for a few minutes, to steam out
a trifle more before he whooped to them
to come across and help him. It did not
worry them to wait, — it was all one in
the end: there would be carries to lug
on long after they were dead and gone.
So, looking at the logs ricked up along
the shores and cross-piled on the ledges,
looking at the others drifting past, wal-
lowing and thrashing in the wicked boil
below the falls, they lounged and chaffed
one another. Jerry Durgan was surrep-
titiously laying cool birch leaves on his
abraded shoulder, and Bill Halpin was
attentively, though silently, regarding his
shins : there had been none too much
stocking between him and that " big
gray." The Indians, stretched out on
their backs, gazed at the sky ; nothing
fretted them much. On one side, an In-
dian and an Irishman were having a pas-
sage at wit ; on the other, two or three
were arguing about the ins and outs of
a big fight up at 'Suncook the winter be-
fore, and a Province man was colloguing
with a Yankee on points of scriptural
interpretation. It was such talk as might
be overheard almost any time on the
drive when men are resting at their ease.
" It was French Joe that nailed Billy ;
Billy he told me so," came from the
group under the birches.
From among the Indians out in the
sunlight arose a persuasive Irish voice.
" Why is it, Tomah, that when your
folks are good Catholics, and our folks
are good Catholics, you don't ever name
your children Patrick and Bridget ? "
And the reply came quick : " 'Cause
we hate it Irish so bad, you know ! "
Off at the right they were wrangling
about the construction of the Ark.
" And I 'd just like to have seen that
bo't when they got her done," said the
Yankee ; " just one door an' one windei-,
an' vent'lated like Harvey Doaue's scho'l-
'ouse. They caught him nailin' of the
winders down. ' How be ye goin' to
vent'late ? ' says they. ' Oh,' says he,
' fresh air 's powerful circulatin' stuff ; I
callate they '11 carry the old air out in
their pockets, an' bring enough fresh air
in in their caps to keep 'em goin' ; ' an'
that was all they ever did get 's long 's
he was school agent. My scissors ! three
stories an' all full of live stock, an' only
one winder, an' that all battened down !
Tell you what ! I 'd 'a' hated to be Mr.
Noah's fambly an' had to stay in that ole
Ark ten months an' a half before they
took the cover off ! Fact ! I read it all
up onct ! "
Said another : " I don't seem to 'mem-
ber how she was built 'ceptin' the way
they run her seams. She must have ben
a jim-dickey house with the pitch all on
the inside 's well as on the outside o' her.
Seems to me a bo't ain't bettered none
by a daub o' pitch where the' ain't none
needed."
" 'T ain't the Ark as bothers me some,"
put in the Province man ; " I reckon
that flood business is pretty nigh straight,
but I couldn't never cipher out about
that Tower of Babel thing. Man ask
for a hod o' mortar, an' like enough
they 'd send him up a barrel of gaspe-
reau ; that 's " —
The religious discussion broke off
abruptly.
"Holy Hell!— Look a-comin'!"
gasped the Yankee.
Man ! but that was a sight to see !
They got up and devoured it with their
eyes.
Lugging Boat on Sowadnehunk.
505
On the verge of the fall hovered the
batteau about to leap. Big Sebat and his
bowman crouched to help her, like a
rider lifting his horse to a leap. And
their eyes were set with fierce excite-
ment, their hands cleaved to their paddle
handles, they felt the thrill that ran
through the boat as they shot her clear,
and, flying out beyond the curtain of the
fall, they landed her in the yeasty rapids
below.
Both on their feet then ! And how
they bent their paddles and whipped
them from side to side, as it was " In ! "
_ « Out ! " — " Right ! " — " Left ! "
to avoid the logs caught on the ledges
and the great rocks that lay beneath the
boils and snapped at them with their
ugly fangs as they went flying past. The
spray was on them ; the surges crested
over their gunwales ; they sheered from
the rock, but cut the wave that covered
it and carried it inboard. And always
it was " Right ! " — " Left ! " — " In ! "
— " Out ! " as the greater danger drove
them to seek the less.
But finally they ran her out through
the tail of the boil, and fetched her
ashore in a cove below the carry-end,
out of sight of the men. She was full of
water, barely afloat.
Would Sebattis own to the boys who
were hurrying down through the bushes
that he had escaped with his life only by
the greatest luck ? Not Sebattis !
" Now you bale her out paddles," said
he to his bowman, and they swept her
with their paddles as one might with a
broom.
" Now you drain her out." command-
ed Sebattis, when they could lift the re-
maining weight, and they raised the bow
and let the water run out over the slant-
ing stern, all but a few pailf uls. " Better
you let dat stay," said the shrewd Se-
battis.
It was quick work, but when the crew
broke through the bushes, there stood
Sebattis and his bowman leaning on their
paddles like bronze caryatids, one on
either side of the boat. They might
have been standing thus since the days
of the Pharaohs, they were so at ease.
" Well, boys, how did you make it ? "
queried the first to arrive on the spot.
Sebattis smiled his simple, vacuous
smile. " Oh, ver' good ; she took inlilT
water mebbe."
" By gee, that ain't much water ! Did
she strike anything ? "
Sebattis helped to turn her over. She
had not a scratch upon her.
Then the men all looked again at the
boat that had been over Sowadnehunk,
and they all trooped back to the carry-
end without saying much, two full bat-
teau crews and Sebattis and his bowman.
They did not talk. No man would have
gained anything new by exchanging
thoughts with his neighbor.
And when they came to the two boats
drying in the sun, they looked one an-
other in the eyes again. It was a foregone
conclusion. Without a word they put
their galled shoulders under the gunwales,
lifted the heavy batteaus to their places,
and started back across that carry forty
rods to the end they had just come from.
What for ? It was that in his own
esteem a Penobscot man will not stand
second to any other man. They would
not have it said that Sebattis Mitchell
was the only man of them who had tried
to run Sowadnehunk Falls.
So they put in again, six men to a
boat, full crews, and in the stern of one
stood Joe Attien, who was Thoreau's
guide, and in the bow Steve Stanislaus,
his cousin. That sets the date, — that it
was back in 1870, — for it became the
occasion for another and a sadder tale.
And they pushed out with their two
boats and ran the falls.
But the luck that bore Sebattis safely
through was not theirs. Both boats were
swamped, battered on the rocks into
kindling wood. Twelve men were thrown
into the water, and pounded and swashed
about among logs and rocks. Some by
swimming, some by the aid of Sebattis
506
The Aristocracy of the Dollar.
and his boat, eleven of them got ashore,
" a little damp," as no doubt the least ex-
aggerative of them were willing to admit.
The unlucky twelfth man they picked up
later, quite undeniably drowned. And
the boats were irretrievably smashed.
Indeed, that was the part of the tale that
rankled with Sebattis when he used to
tell it.
" Berry much she blame it us " (that
is, himself) " that time John Loss."
(Always to the Indian mind John Ross,
the head contractor of the drive, was the
power that commanded wind, logs, and.
weather.) " She don' care so much
'cause drowned it man, 'cause she can get
blenty of it men ; but dose e'er boats she
talk 'bout berry hard."
That is how they look at such little
deeds themselves. The man who led off
gets the credit and the blame ; he is the
only one remembered. But to an out-
sider what wins more than passing ad-
miration is not the one man who suc-
ceeded, but the many who followed after
and failed, who could not let well enough
alone when there was a possible better 1
be achieved, but, on the welcome end of
the carry, the end where all their trou-
bles of galls and bruises and heavy bui
dens in the heat are over, pick up theii
boats without a word, not one man of
them falling out, and lug them back a
weary forty rods to fight another round
with Death sooner than own themselves
outdone.
Fannie Hardy Eckstorm.
PART OF A MAN'S LIFE.
" The uttered part of a man's life, let us always repeat, bears to the unuttered, unconsciou
part a small unknown proportion. He himself never knows it, much less do others." — Carlyle's
Essay on Scott.
THE ARISTOCRACY OF THE DOLLAR.
IT is much to be doubted whether any
marriage contract in history had ever a
simpler or compacter basis than that be-
tween the celebrated Dr. Samuel Johnson
and the lady who became his wife. It
stands recorded, not in Boswell's Life of
him, but in the scarcely less entertaining
letters of his contemporary, Miss Anna
Seward. He told the object of his affec-
tions that he was, in the first place, of
mean extraction ; that, in the second place,
he had no money ; and that, in the third
place, he had had an uncle hanged. Not to
be outdone, the lady replied as promptly
that she valued no man the more or the
less for his parentage ; that as to money,
she had none herself; and that, in re-
gard to his last point, although she had
never had a near relative literally and
actually hanged, she had at least twenty
who deserved to be. It is needless
say that a marriage between two sucl
congenial spirits followed, and that
was, all things considered, fairly happj
It is worth noticing, also, that the t\
lovers sketched out unconsciously the sue
cessive phases of social structure whicl
have prevailed in the world. Societ
must always have some kind of arist
cracy or leadership, some standard
social precedence. The aristocracy
birth is one form of this standard ; tha
of wealth is another ; while that of wia
dom, of virtue, and of never having li£
a relative hanged is still another. Let
for the present confine ourselves to tl
first two of these alternatives.
We are living in a transition period of
our social history. The aristocracy of
birth is passing away. The aristocracy
The Aristocracy of the Dollar.
507
of wealth is coming forward. This in
its turn may yield to something better.
There is certainly room for it! But
standing as we do at the deathbed of one
form of social organization and the birth
of another, it is worth while to compare
their merits. There are those who hon-
estly believe that in losing hereditary
aristocracy the world is losing much, and
who see a formidable danger in the aris-
tocracy of wealth. Others maintain, as
sincerely, that this movement is a step
forward and not backward. It is a good
time to set the two side by side and see
how far the world is likely to lose or gain
by the exchange.
In all Europe, of the hereditary gov-
erning bodies which once ruled it, there
is left to-day but one, the English House
of Lords. In one or two other countries,
such as Austria and Prussia, the upper
chamber contains the hereditary element,
but it is never exclusive, while the Eng-
lish House of Lords stands by itself. It
is, indeed, in one respect more aristo-
cratic than in the Middle Ages, because
in those days it consisted quite largely of
an appointive body, the dignitaries of the
church, who had commonly risen from the
ranks of the people, and whose position
was not hereditary. This life element,
comprising the bishops, has now been
reduced, as Gold win Smith once said,
" to comparative insignificance in point
of numbers, and to almost total insignifi-
cance in point of influence." This im-
pairing of power further extends to the
whole body of the House of Lords from
the very dignity of its traditions, and
from the recent origin of most of its peer-
ages. Not only do very few of these date
back as far as the landing of the Pilgrims
in America, but the very membership of
the House, and consequently its voting
power, depends at any moment on the ac-
tion of the King. When the Reform Bill
was carried, June 7, 1832, by the express
promise of the King to create new peers
enough, if needful, to carry it through the
Lords, the Lords became from that mo-
ment, for practical action, a wholly sec-
ondary body ; a system of brakes — not
of wheels — for the car of state. It is
becoming filled, accordingly, as Mr. Bod-
ley tells us in his France, with " newly
made peers, who prevail upon the editors
of peerages to erase from their pedigrees
the worthy aldermen who founded their
fortunes, and accord them forefathers who
performed feats at Hastings unknown to
the workers of the Bayeux tapestry "
(ir. 375). We see the outcome in the
criticisms of Vanity Fair on London so-
ciety : "In Rome and Vienna, and even
in republican Paris, London society has
become a laughing stock. Blood, pride
of race, what are these ? Where are
they nowadays ? Money, above all the
willingness to entertain, these are the
pass-keys to what was once a fortress to
be entered by birth, and by birth alone."
For the aristocracy of birth, the Eng-
lish basis was the law of primogeniture,
which Dr. Johnson maintained to be a
good law, because it made only one fool
in each family. Yet we forget how few
years it is since, in some of our older
American colonies, the traditions of Old
England were still upheld, in this respect,
and hereditary forces ruled the state. I
remember talking once with a Rhode
Islander, now an aged man, who recalled
the time when he had returned from In-
dia from a five years' absence, and who
had then voted when but one day in port,
because he was the oldest son of his fa-
ther.
Nothing, indeed, now remains in Amer-
ica which so recalls the feudal system as
the whole region of the Narragansett
country in Rhode Island, where one still
sees the remains of a class of buildings
differing in kind from any now erected.
They represent great square houses of
fifty or a hundred and fifty feet front,
with drawing-rooms twenty feet square
and from fourteen to sixteen feet high.
There were two stories, with high gam-
brel attics for the slaves, who often occu-
508
The Aristocracy of the Dollar.
pied outbuildings, also. The houses were
so large that in one of them, the old Potter
house, there occurred a house-warming
of three days and nights, during which
the old father and mother, in their out-
of-the-way rooms, never learned that any-
thing was going on. Under the law of
primogeniture, then prevailing, the house-
holds were on such a scale that one of
these magnates, Robert Hazard, is said
to have boasted of economy, when he
brought his family down to seventy per-
sons. He owned twelve thousand acres,
kept foxhounds, four thousand sheep, one
hundred and fifty cows, and fourteen sad-
dle horses. He employed twelve • negro
dairymaids, each with a small girl to wait
upon her, by whose joint labors from
twelve to twenty-four cheeses were made
every day in the year for family con-
sumption ; and, let us hope, people took
exercise enough to digest the product.
These are, at any rate, the still living tra-
ditions of the Narragansett country as
they prevailed thirty years ago.
In a similar way an almost feudal sys-
tem of proprietorship was tried on the
Hudson, and went down in the " anti-rent
war." In the catalogues of our early
colleges, the names of students were not
arranged alphabetically, as now, but ac-
cording to the relative social position of
students' families, this lasting until 1767
at Yale, and until 1772 at Harvard. The
Society of the Cincinnati was undoubted-
ly relied upon by many as a step toward
hereditary aristocracy. But what came
of it ? You hear of a few quiet, elderly
gentlemen as eating an annual dinner to-
gether, and that is all the world knows of
it. Thus easily have died out all efforts
to establish such hereditary classes among
us. Yet I can remember when it was
jocosely said of some families of Massa-
chusetts that they claimed to have had,
in the time of Noah's deluge, a boat to
themselves ; and I can recall, on the other
hand, when a social aspirant in Boston
asked, " Who belong to the really old
families, grandmamma ? " and that rela-
tive shook her weary head and said,
" Mostly no one, my dear."
The advance in the standard of wealth
in the last century is recognized by all
as something formidable. In the writer's
boyhood, John P. Gushing was the only
man in Boston, or its vicinity, who was
suspected of being a millionaire ; and
even in his case some regarded such
wealth as incredible. He was an essen-
tially modest, retiring man, and said to
a lady of my acquaintance, who ventured
to reproach him for having holes in his
shoes, that he knew no real advantage
of wealth, except to be able to wear one's
old shoes without criticism. But what
is a million dollars to-day ? To the eyes
of many it represents economy, almost
poverty ; at any rate, a step toward the
almshouse. John Jacob Astor was said
to be worth twenty millions, and that was
such a colossal fortune, people had again
to alter their standard of figures in arith-
metic. After this, Commodore Vander-
bilt's forty millions seemed but a step,
and the next Vanderbilt's two hundred
millions were not so wholly startling. Yet
men looked with commiseration on the
division of this last fortune by his pub-
lished will. Sixty millions to each of
two sons, and the rest of the family cut
off with ten millions apiece ! Men felt
like taking up a contribution in the
churches. Yet what seemed even these
wonders compared with the personal for-
tunes of the present day !
Let us look first at the alarming side
of this rapid growth of wealth. First
comes its possible interference with our
whole system of local government. A
successful merchant of the last genera-
tion in Boston felt the increasing burden
of taxation so heavily that he moved
from the city to a country town where
his father had been a modest clergyman.
Inquiring of the town officials as to his
taxation, they hesitated a little to reply,
as if wishing to deal gently with the
brilliant fish thus migrating to their quiet
The Aristocracy of the Dollar.
509
pool. To solve the problem, he suggested
that they send him the town bills as pre-
sented for the coming year, and let him
try a financial experiment. He then
paid them all in succession, and thereby
saved twenty thousand dollars on his
annual tax, as paid hitherto in Boston.
The selectmen, meanwhile, collected of
all other taxpayers their usual amount,
made a separate fund of it, and spent
that in securing the best roads and sign-
boards in the county. It was all very
well in this instance. But suppose a
series of millionaires, migrating to a
series of country towns, what would be
the result, and how long before we
should have a new form of feudalism ?
This was one question to be seriously
raised, and soon there were others.
How is it all to end, men asked, this
new development ? Consider history,
they said. We can readily understand
how the castles on the Rhine went down.
The traveler visits their terrible torture-
chambers, their oubliettes, and then
reads the tale of the free burghers, the
weavers and lace-makers of the Low
Countries who swept down that beautiful
valley and made an end of feudalism.
No such easy process suggests itself amid
the complications of modern labor ; and
should a new race, born of sudden wealth,
arise, what would it be ? How many
generations would it take to secure good
manners, for instance, in the new masters
of the community ? What will become
of the refinements of life, if all the guid-
ance of good society is to be transferred
to the hands of those who have spent
the prime of their existence in making
money ?
It is to be noticed, moreover, that the
very men who repudiated the coat-of-
arms were the men most eager to as-
sume it when they once had an excuse.
How rarely do you find in society the
men who have the courage to tell the
exact truth about their own antecedents !
It is so exceptional that, wherever it is
done, it fills us with admiration. Pope
Urban IV was the son of a cobbler, and
had pursued that vocation himself, and
so, with proper pride, he used a cobbler's
tools as his symbol. Bishop Willegis,
who was brought up as a wheelwright,
becoming at last a bishop, and being en-
titled to a coat-of-arms, found, when he
went to take possession of his palace, that
the little boys had been chalking wheels
all over the walls. Being a man of sense,
he put a wheel upon his coat-of-arms,
and the little boys lost their fun, while
the price of chalk went down.
Again, Goethe's father was in early
life a blacksmith, and in Frankfort, over
the door of the house where the great
German poet was born, may be seen the
coat-of-arms assumed, in a manner, by
his father. The elder Goethe was skilled
in the manufacture of horseshoes, and he
wished to put three horseshoes over his
door for a crest ; but his architect, wish-
ing the fact to appear to the utmost ad-
vantage, wove those horseshoes into the
shape of a musical lyre, and thus uncon-
sciously predicted that within those walls
the greatest of modern poets should be
born. How fine is all this, yet how
vainly one may watch along the streets
of any fashionable watering-place for
any carriage panel that might have been
designed by Pope Urban, Bishop Wille-
gis, or the elder Goethe ; and how many
may one see which represent a dragon
or unicorn or griffin, some creature out
of whose hide and horn no one ever
made a living since the world began.
Not one of these even rivaled the tra-
ditional motto of Senator Philetus Saw-
yer, of Michigan, who, having gained a
fortune by the honest pursuit his name
implied, adorned his carriage with the
Latin word " Vidi," which, being trans-
lated, signifies " I saw."
No doubt there were facts enough on
which to base all this solicitude, yet there
is another side. The aristocracy based
on the dollar has its own weaknesses and
follies ; yet it has certain merits. Its first
510
The Aristocracy of the Dollar.
merit is that it belongs to the present,
not to the past ; it represents something
that is being done, or has lately been
done, whether for good or evil ; not some-
thing which has long gone by. When
Theodore Parker first.visited Cincinnati,
at that time the recognized leader among
Western cities, he said that he had made
a great discovery, namely, that while
the aristocracy of Cincinnati was unques-
tionably founded on pork, it made a great
difference whether a man killed pigs for
himself, or whether his father had killed
them. The one was held plebeian, the
other patrician. It was the difference,
Parker said, between the stick 'ems and
the stuck 'ems ; and his own sympathies,
he confessed, were with the present tense.
It was, in other words, aristocracy in the
making. It stood for a race which had
found forests to be cleared, streams to
be bridged, and roads to be built ; the
dollar was not only behind these forms of
service, but it was the corner-stone of the
schoolhouse and the church. It predicted
a civilization which should belong to to-
day, not to yesterday ; and belonging to
to-day, should also predict to-morrow.
Out of this close allegiance to the pre-
sent tense, the aristocracy of the dollar has
derived several other advantages. It has
always emerged, within a generation or
two at the farthest, from the ranks of
the plain people, and thus always seems
nearer to them. It takes for that reason
the color of its time. It is not too per-
manent. It finds sympathies at home, and
spends its money there : in three quarters
of the towns in Massachusetts, for ex-
ample, you find a town hall or a public
library that was presented by some native
of the town. It is not easily crushed or
even intimidated ; so that it is not un-
common to find a man who has made one
or two fortunes and lost them, and is now
resting on his third. It appreciates other
forms of influence than its own, and has
a secret reverence for science, for history,
and even for literature.
None are more ready than rich men
to recognize that while one man makes
money in business, another may devote
himself to intellectual pursuits. The
elder Agassiz once refused a profitable
course of lectures on the ground that he
had not, just then, the time to make
money. If mere material wealth is all
that is thought of among business men, he
would have been thought fit for an in-
sane hospital, but as it was, he was all the
more respected. Those who say that our
people look merely at wealth take a very
superficial view. As a rule, men do not
know who is the richest man in the next
city or the next state. Mere wealth has,
after all, a very limited reputation com-
pared with that of intellect. An English
novelist comes here, and every town hall
is open to him ; a Swedish peasant girl
comes to sing to us, and we pay any price
to hear. Bring forward your art and
your genius, the community seems to say,
and we will provide the money. Let an
ordinary millionaire land at the wharf,
on the other hand, and no more attention
is paid to him than if he were an ex-
governor. The very fact that the pur-
suit of wealth among us demands rare
talent and energy seems of itself to cre-
ate respect for those same qualities when
manifested in other ways.
Why did the aristocracy of parentage
fail to hold its own ? Why did it die out
in America and, practically speaking, in
all the British colonies ? It had every
advantage at the outset ; it held the in-
side track. It failed because two great
laws of the universe were against it : first,
the laws of arithmetic, and, secondly, the
laws of physiology. It violated the prin-
ciples of arithmetic because it required
that each individual or household should
have a distinct line of ancestors, and it
would thus be discovered in a few gener
ations that there were not nearly enough
ancestors to go round, leaving people ii
the position of Mark Twain, who declare
that he had " no parents to speak of, onlj
a father and mother or so." It was con-
trary to the laws of physiology, as showr
The Aristocracy of the Dollar.
511
by the deterioration of one royal fami-
ly after another in Europe, these having
come to resemble those English race
horses which have so much blood that
there is very little horse, and it must be
replenished from a more plebeian stock.
To sum it all up, the strength of hered-
itary aristocracy lay, undoubtedly, in a
sort of accumulated self-respect ; the
coats-of-arms may or may not have been
given originally for great deeds, but mem-
ory or imagination gradually assigned
them to that origin as time went on. As
Marmontel nicely defined it, " Nobility
of birth is a letter of credit given us on
our country, upon the security of our an-
cestors, in the conviction that at a proper
period of life we shall acquit ourselves
with honor to those who stand engaged
for us." On the other hand, the strength
of the newer form of aristocracy lies in
its greater nearness to the community at
large, as being of more recent and tan-
gible origin, and as usually showing some
special visible gift or faculty in those who
represent it. Its beginning may have
been never so humble, yet these qualities
bear some vague promise of its future.
The thing which most puzzled that
early traveler in America, Captain Basil
Hall, in 1827, was to see on the high-
road a pig-driver wearing spectacles ;
and it is only a few years since a newly
arrived Englishman mentioned to me, as
something requiring explanation, that he
had seen somebody in a full suit of black
broadcloth feeding hogs. I had a call,
many years since, from a young lady,
well-dressed, well-bred, and of Ameri-
can birth, who wished to be hired to do
housework, and stipulated that she should
bring her own piano. I met lately a man
whose professions were farming, cigar-
making, running a saw-mill, ice-cutting,
sailing a fishing schooner, and peddling
parched-corn candy balls. The average
life of a college boy might furnish mate-
rial for that book entitled the Romance
of a Poor Young Man ; and we all make
a living, as Shakespeare's Touchstone
threatens to kill his rival, in a hundred
and fifty different ways. No doubt
plenty of young people are now born
rich, but they are very rarely people
whose grandparents had that experience.
The community watches them with some
interest to discover whether they are to
furnish new illustrations of the rural
American proverb that it takes but three
generations to go from shirt - sleeves to
shirt-sleeves.
After all, the worship of the dollar is
but the foam upon the advancing wave
of modern civilization. It breaks into
spray and vanishes, even while we gaze.
Even now there are not a score of men.
in America who are known by name
throughout the land for their wealth
alone ; but a young man who makes a
single brilliant speech at a political meet-
ing, or a young girl who writes a clever
story, may wake up some fine morning
and encounter a fame spread from Maine
to California, before either of them has
made enough money out of it to pay a
washerwoman's bill. " The whole in-
terest of history," says Emerson, " lies in
the fortunes of the poor." All the novels
are full of the enjoyments of wealth ; but
who celebrates the joys of poverty ? The
pride of its little prudences, the joy of
its wholesome abstinences, the magnifi-
cent delight of its occasional holidays ; —
who but Dickens ever described them ?
Who but his little Jacob ever knew what
oysters were, or really saw a play ? En-
joyment does not lie in quantity, but in
quality. The first book is worth the
library ; the first cheap engraving may
give more lasting pleasure than the pic-
ture gallery that follows. How few really
cheerful faces one sees in the carriages
on a fashionable avenue ; in the carriage,
for instance, of Mrs. Croesus, who thinks
it her duty to drive, " in order to air the
horses." But what unutterable bliss is
the Sunday afternoon drive to the over-
worked clerk who has been putting by
the two dollars for at least two years,
512
The Aristocracy of the Dollar.
and lying awake at night to decide on
the cheapest livery stable ! True, Mrs.
Croesus has the felicity of being the more
stared at, but the young man has the pro-
founder felicity of not caring whether he
is stared at or not, so long as he — and
the young woman — enjoy themselves.
Thus the little boy who was seen asleep
at the theatre, night after night, ex-
plained, toward the end of the season, to
the sympathetic and inquiring stranger
who waked him, " Ah, but you see, I
have to come. I 've got a season ticket ! "
Alas for wealth, which has season tickets
for everything and gets the full relish
out of nothing !
If the general tenor of this essay is
thus far correct, it may be claimed that
the aristocracy of the millionaires is only
a prelude to the aristocracy of the mil-
lions. We talk of the upper ten thousand
now, and may talk of the upper ten mil-
lion by and by, and so on toward the
whole population. As this advance is
gradually made, we need not fear but
that all the proprieties of life will follow,
even if slowly. It is really a greater
step to have taught a whole people to
read and write than to have taught them
all to carry themselves politely and to
use their forks properly. I can remem-
ber well, in visiting our Western states,
fifty years ago, that one encountered in
traveling scarcely a person who did not
eat with the knife ; whereas now one
would think, in hotel or steamboat, that
every man was born, not with a silver
spoon, but with a silver fork in his mouth.
A friend of mine, in those days, using a
choice phrase at a Western steamboat
table was hailed by an unexpected voice :
" That 's a very pretty word you made
use of, stranger. Would you have the
goodness to repeat that word ? " That
condition of things made the popularity
of English novels at that day. They
were handbooks of good manners for a
public longing to be taught. Here were
twenty-five million people eager to learn
the manners of duchesses. This spread
the new fashions ; in older countries,
dress was a badge ; the cook would lose
her place if she ventured to wear a bon-
net like that of her mistress. Here, if
the mistress objected to the bonnet, she
would lose her cook.
In all this process of gradual develop-
ment, wealth naturally takes the lead
upon a path which tends, on the whole,
upward. The aristocracy of the dollar
may or may not prepare the way for any-
thing better than its predecessor, but it
will have its day. The aristocracy of
birth yields, though reluctantly. A story
is told of an Englishman who, after a de-
lightful chat with Thackeray, whom he
met as a stranger at a club in London,
upon being told that it was a famous
author to whom he had been talking, re-
plied with surprise, " Is he an author ?
I had taken him for a gentleman." So
Dr. Johnson, nearly two centuries ago,
had defined an English merchant as " a
new species of gentleman," and Lord
Stanhope said, with undoubted truth,
that the only trade in which an English
gentleman could then engage was that
of a wine merchant. Travelers tell us
of an instance in Scotland where, at
dinner party, an upper servant was sent
round beforehand to inquire how many
acres of land each guest had inherited,
so that they might be arranged at the
table in their proper order. How child-
ish these discriminations appear in a land
where, as the newspapers lately informed
us, a single resident of Rochester, New
York, owned four hundred farms in dif-
ferent states in the Union, including tl
ty-five thousand acres in the state of Ken-
tucky alone ; or where, as was stated not
long since, one American citizen cor
trolled two great telegraph lines acre
the continent and four out of the sever
New York daily papers !
That the new aristocracy will have it
own problems to meet is plain enougt
One great one lies already in the for
ground. In Mr. Bodley's France, ger
Some Recent Aspects of Darwinism.
513
erally recognized as one of the ablest
of modern social studies, he tells us that
in all the leading modern nations, whether
styled republican or otherwise, society
is no longer complex, but has practical-
ly become divided into only two social
classes : " that which gains a livelihood
by manual toil, and that which earns a
living in other ways, or subsists on the
interest of capital " (i. 9). Is this easy
conclusion justified ? Now that mercan-
tile life has come to be, as in America,
a gentleman's employment, who can help
seeing that it only involves a question
of time for mechanical occupations to re-
ceive the same recognition ? Who can
go into a machine shop of the present day
without thinking how much more of in-
tellect dwells in those wheels and bands
than in the majority, not merely of count-
ing-rooms, but even of court-rooms and
pulpits ? Constant inventive power is
steadily transforming trades into arts ;
the great factory not only educates the
man who runs it, but every boy who
tends a lever or minds an engine. I re-
member that once, when I approached at
evening, by a local railway branch, the
New England village where I was to give
a lecture, I noticed, as we drew near the
station, an eager interest and mutual con-
ference among the passengers, joined
with an air of evident pride and exulta-
tion. I was at last approached by the
conductor, who had evidently noted me,
with the inquiry whether I was the lec-
turer expected. On my assenting, his
face lighted up as he eagerly told me the
fact which had evidently thrilled every
breast. " You may not be aware, sir,"
he said, " that the president of the lecture
association has been called out of town,
and that the vice president who is to pre-
sent you to the audience is the engineer
of this very train ! " When the time
came, no President of the United States
could have introduced a guest with more
propriety and dignity than did this rail-
way engineer ; and when I left that little
town at dawn, he honored me with a seat
beside him on the locomotive, — his own
lecture platform. I felt for an hour, in
the glory of the swift motion and of that
winter sunrise, as if the whole problem
of democracy were solved and the future
of the republic were secure.
Thomas Wentworth Higginson.
SOME RECENT ASPECTS OF DARWINISM.1
FOB us who have grown up since 1859,
the doctrine of the Origin of Species
has become so far one of those things
quod semjjer, quod omnibus, quod ubique
creditum est, that we waken from our
dogmatic slumbers with something of a
start to find that, of three recent books
which touch upon Darwinism, two are
1 Doubts about Darwinism. By A SEMI-
DARWINIAN. New York : Longmans, Green
& Co. 1903.
Evolution and Adaptation. By THOMAS
HUNT MORGAN, Ph. D. New York: The
Maemillan Co. 1903.
Variation in Animals and Plants. By H. M.
VOL. xcin. — NO. 558. 33
frankly skeptical as to the sufficiency of
Natural Selection.
The fact is, however, that the Darwin-
ian, along with his other troubles, has
always had to face one serious dilemma.
Seeking to discover why, if there must
be living beings in the world, there should
be so very many different kinds, he
VERNON, M. A., M. D. New York: Henry
Holt & Co. 1903.
Mendel's Principles of Heredity, a Defence.
With a Translation of Mendel's Original Papers
on Hybridization. By W. BATESON, M. A.,
F. R. S. Cambridge, at the University Press.
1902.
514
Some Recent Aspects of Darwinism.
seizes — not unreasonably — upon the
little differences as the starting-point for
the big ones. He sees that, as a matter
of fact, no two leaves on the same oak
are exactly alike, and no two oaks have
just the same average leaf. Almost in-
evitably he imagines that ten thousand
of these minute differences have been
lumped together to make the greater
ones which distinguish red oak leaves
from white. Thus far the Darwinian is
one with all evolutionists. He parts
company with the others only on the
question of causes. Darwin's great dis-
covery was Natural Selection ; a con-
venient short-hand expression — though,
as experience has shown, a very confus-
ing one — for the interaction of several
causes, which together integrate little
differences into larger ones. The Dar-
winian, then, attributes a great part of
the multiform variety of living beings,
and the adaptation of each to its, special
place in the world, to the continued se-
lection of such small variations as are
seen to occur in nature. But, unfortu-
nately for the logic of his case, there
are two sorts of these variations. There
are, in the first place, those innumerable
slight differences which hardly serve to
distinguish one creature from another.
There are, besides, those occasional and
greater unlikenesses between parent and
offspring — such as the double paws of
the house cat — which it is now the fash-
ion to call discontinuous variations or
mutations. If now the Darwinian, called
upon to declare which of these two kinds
of variation has furnished the raw mate-
rial for selection, alleges the commoner
sort, he is immediately told that no new
organ can possibly arise from these, be-
cause they are always too small for se-
lection to seize upon. Survival, he is
informed, is a matter of real fitness, of
having or not having some important
quality, not a question of a little more
here and a little less there. If, on the
other hand, he takes to citing cases of
greater departures, he must meet the
objection that these are always so fe\
that they are, of necessity, promptlj
swamped by intercrossing. What if it
portant mutations do occur once in
thousand times, who can find a trace
any of them after ten generations !
Darwin himself saw this difficulty quit
as clearly as anybody. With character
istic disregard of merely formal consic
erations, he rested his case on the fact
There are, he said in effect, practically
these two sorts of variation. Gardener
and breeders have actually used one kinc
or the other to produce all the countle
varieties of pigeons, dogs, horses, cattle
fruits, flowering plants, and the rest
Whatever man has done, Nature has done
also, on a larger scale, by the saint
means. The origin of any partici
natural species, or of any prize-winning
artificial stock, by selection of one sort of
variants or the other, is a matter of de
tailed evidence, and is not to be discus
on general grounds. It was a case
solvitur ambidando, and on that basis
Darwin converted the world. Wher
however, it came to threshing out tl
evidence for individual cases, Darwin, ii
general, put most stress on the commom
sort of variation. When this did nc
seem to meet the case, he fell back or
the other kind in a way that made sor
of his opponents say that he was playing
fast and loose with the whole questioi
and many of his supporters feel that he
had not, after all, quite met the whol
difficulty. When all has been said, ar
ficial races are not exactly the same
natural species. Then, too, the analog
between Nature and the gardener anc
breeder breaks down at the wrong point
since Nature cannot segregate her single
favored individual by transplanting it
another bed, or shutting it up in a bos
stall. In spite, therefore, of a great deal
of very ingenious reasoning, the old di-
lemma, under one form or another, has
remained, to be the basis of pretty much
every reasonable objection which has ever
been urged against Natural Selection,
Some Recent Aspects of Darwinism.
515
except only those which spring out of
that other plague of the Darwinian, the
too numerous cases of imperfect adjust-
ment to environment.
For about a generation following the
publication of the Origin, writers on evo-
lution were inclined to content them-
selves with constructing ingenious theo-
ries on the basis of Darwin's evidence,
piecing out one untested hypothesis with
another, and, in general, following a dia-
lectical method which fairly merited Mr.
Bateson's sarcastic paraphrase : " ' If,'
say we with much circumlocution, ' the
course of Nature followed the lines we
have suggested, then, in short, it did.' "
As he put the case ten years ago : —
" So far, indeed, are the interpreters
of Evolution from adding to this [Dar-
win's] store of facts, that in their hands
the original stock becomes even less, un-
til only the most striking remain. It is
wearisome to watch the persistence with
which these are revived for the purpose
of each new theorist. How well we know
the offspring of Lord Morton's mare, the
bitch Sappho, the Sebright Bantams,
the Himalaya Rabbit with pink eyes, the
white Cats with their blue eyes, and the
rest ! Perhaps the time has come when
even these splendid observations cannot
be made to show much more. Surely
their use is now rather to point the di-
rection in which we must go for new
facts."
The last decade has changed all this.
A few of the younger men who have
come up since the days of ignorance have
turned their backs upon the older ques-
tions, and have gone to work on the two
great presuppositions of Darwinism, he-
redity and variation, making them always
a question of fact, and not of logic, in a
way that would have delighted Darwin's
heart. As a result of this work, unless
all signs fail, the next few years should
see an advance in the theory of evolution
comparable with that which is just now
making the physicist the thaumaturgist
of science.
Variation is, therefore, except for Dar-
win's work, almost a new subject ; so
new, that important facts concerning the
commonest animals and plants are still
ungathered. Indeed, so inconsiderable
is the amount which has yet been written
from the modern standpoint, and that lit-
tle is so easily come at, that almost any
one who enjoys play ing with mathematics,
or any amateur gardener with a turn for
experimenting, can, with a few months'
reading, put himself in the way of mak-
ing worthy contributions to science.
Luckily, too, for all writers on heredi-
ty and variation, and perhaps still more
fortunately for the interest of their read-
ers, the two turn out to be, not, as used
to be said, two antagonistic principles,
but merely different aspects of the same
problem. Nature seems always to be
striving to give to each creature seed af-
ter its kind. She never quite succeeds,
and, in so far as she fails, we call her
failure variation. She rarely fails seri-
ously, and such measure of success as
she attains we term heredity. A single
illustration will serve to show how close
the two stand to each other and to every-
day life. It must be a matter of common
observation that different parts of the
body are so correlated that, for example,
long arms nearly always accompany long
legs, and usually a long face also. Mod-
ern standards of accuracy, however, de-
mand something more definite than gen-
eral impressions that certain things are
apt to occur together. So the powerful
mathematical analysis, which is perhaps
the most distinctive feature of recent
work in this field, has yielded, among
other things, the index of correlation, a
convenient numerical measure of the
strength of the tie between the variations
of any two organs of the body. On the
other hand, the index of correlation for
the same organs between parent and off-
spring is a measure of the force of hered-
ity. Professor Karl Pearson finds that
this correlation is least between mother
and daughter, somewhat greater between
516
Some Recent Aspects of Darwinism.
mother and son, greater still between
father and daughter, and greatest of all
between father and son. Thus it appears
— and this is corroborated by other evi-
dence — that men not only transmit more
to their children of either sex than do
women, but also inherit more even from
their mothers ; a striking justification
of our immemorial emphasis on inherit-
ance in the male line. Per contra, if
women inherit less from their fathers and
grandfathers, by so much more are they
the daughters of the race. Professor
Pearson's discovery recalls a piece of bio-
logical speculation — out of fashion now
and much frowned upon in certain quar-
ters — to the effect that males furnish
everywhere the variable and progressive
element of a species, while the great
stream of racial inheritance flows through
the females ; a theory which would ex-
plain the differences between men and
women by supposing that in the one Na-
ture tries her little fliers, in the other, she
salts down her gains.
For the anonymous author of Doubts
about Darwinism the old dilemma still
offers nothing better than a choice of
horns on which to spit himself, in spite
of all the good work of the last dozen
years, with which, to be sure, he shows
no very striking acquaintance. Like the
worthy clergymen who, a generation ago,
used to refute the evolutionists on the
basis of a sight acquaintance with the
commoner domestic animals, the " Semi-
Darwinian " can only fall back on a
special act of creative energy whenever
he finds a " gap." It is always possible,
of course, that the teleologist is right,
though even his ready-made explanation
has its own difficulties. Teleology, how-
ever, is not science ; and there never
would have been any science if men had
been contented with giving the easy ex-
planation, — as there never was any un-
til they stopped giving it.
For the two naturalists, on the other
hand, the way out of the old difficulty
lies through the newer studies of inher-
itance and variation. But the two au-
thors tend so far to opposite opinions on
most theoretical questions that they are,
in a general way, the spokesmen for the
somewhat diverse schools into which stu-
dents of the double problem are dividec
by the two sorts of variation. Dr. Vernon
gives an account of all important discov-
eries in variation, heredity, adaptation,
and related subjects since Darwin, with
so much of Darwin's own work as
necessary for a background. But while
he treats all aspects of the question in
due proportion, his chief interest is wit
the stricter Darwinism which puts moa
stress on normal variation. Professor
Morgan comes to his somewhat unorthe
dox opinions by way of the remarkable
studies in the regeneration of lost parts,
an account of which he brought out two
years ago. So that his first concern is
with the problem of adaptation, where
incidentally he disposes most effective-
ly of the teleology of the Semi-Darwin-
ian. For him the study of discontinu-
ous variations and their inheritance has
been the most significant aspect of recent
work. Both authors, therefore, cover a
good deal the same ground ; Professor
Morgan with the more critical attitude
and the greater interest in the general
question, Dr. Vernon with more attention
to new facts and methods for their owi
sake. He assumes that his public is
ready on reading terms with Darwii
while Professor Morgan begins at tl
beginning, and devotes half his space
matters which the other takes for grant
ed. Dr. Vernon is, on the whole, the
easier reading ; largely because his col
lection of facts is many times greater ; ir
some degree because, as a general rule
English men of science write better tbj
Americans. Between the two, model
aspects of organic evolution get pret
well discussed.
But to return to our old dilemma
There is, from the side of continuous va
riation, a great deal which goes to she
that, all theory aside, Natural Selectk
Some Recent Aspects of Darwinism.
517
does seize on small differences which
seem to us of no great importance, and
does use them to hold one species to its
most efficient form, or to modify another
to fit a new set of conditions. To take
but one example out of many, Dr. Bum-
pus found that of 136 storm-beaten Eng-
lish sparrows, the 72 that revived differed
appreciably from the 64 that died. In
general, theaberrantindividuals perished,
and those nearest the typical size and
shape survived. But besides this, the
survivors were shorter and lighter than
the others, longer of leg and breast-bone,
and larger of skull. Yet who would not
have said a priori that half a gram more
of average weight would not be rather
an advantage than otherwise when it
came to weathering a storm, or that a
little inferiority in length of leg could
possibly make the slightest difference one
way or the other ! Still more striking,
perhaps, is the case of Mr. Weldon's
crabs, in which Natural Selection is
modifying a species under our very eyes.
It appears from measurements of thou-
sands of individuals, and after all ima-
ginable precautions for avoiding error,
that the small shore crab of Plymouth
Sound, England, is growing narrower of
body, the ratio of breadth to length fall-
ing off about two per cent in five years.
This change is due to the selective de-
struction of the broader individuals under
the rapidly changing conditions of their
environment. As the water of the Sound
becomes dirtier year by year with the
growth of the cities near by, the narrow-
er crabs are slightly better able to filter
it through their gill-chambers, and have,
therefore, by so much the advantage over
the others in the struggle for existence.
And since their days, on the average, are
longer in the water than their competi-
tors', they leave more descendants to in-
herit their advantage, with the result that
the race, continually recruited from the
offspring of the " fitter " individuals, is
maintaining itself in a situation where
many species once common have been
exterminated. The obvious conclusion is
that here are the beginnings of two new
species. Given time enough, there should
be a new sparrow to fit American wea-
ther, and a new crab to fit the mud of
Plymouth Sound. It is easy enough for
the philosopher to say offhand that the se-
lection of such little differences can never
go beyond the production of local races ;
but how, after all, does he know ?
On the other hand, from the side of
discontinuous variation, we have learned
that almost any plant or animal may sud-
denly exhibit new characters. A perfect
tulip appears with all its parts arranged
by fours, when, by all precedent, they
should go by threes ; and we men, —
who are sometimes thought, very erro-
neously, to be above all bodily change,
— even we are somewhat given to hav-
ing more ribs or fewer than is thought
quite correct, and six or seven digits in
place of the usual five. Equally strik-
ing facts of the same sort were, of course,
known to the older naturalists. But they
missed seeing how common they are ; in
part, no doubt, because the analysis of
the idea of discontinuity had not, in
their day, shown that variation may be
indefinitely small and yet entirely dis-
continuous. Size in man, for example, is
one of the most variable qualities known,
— the dime-museum giant is well up to
ten times the weight of the dwarf, — but
the variation is continuous, in the sense
that all intermediate sizes occur, and those
nearest the mean are most numerous.
Eye-color, on the other hand, though a
very small and unimportant matter, is
discontinuous. Nearly all eyes can be
assigned at a glance either to the brown-
black group or to the gray-blue-green
group. Eyes, therefore, are either dark
or light, almost never intermediate. Not
only, therefore, do we now know that
abrupt variation is very much more com-
mon than used ever to be suspected, but
we have, besides, good reason to think
that almost any species, after plodding
quietly along for ages, may, all of a sud-
518
Some Recent Aspects of Darwinism.
den, take to varying in the most unex-
pected manner. Once a species gets to
kicking over the traces, the new forms
are likely to come with a rush, and the
same mutation to appear independently
over and over again. De Vries, study-
ing mutations of the evening primrose,
found among 50,000 plants in eight
generations, 359 of one " incipient spe-
cies," 229 of another, 158 of a third,
and smaller numbers of four more, all
distinct and self-consistent. Moreover,
two of these new primroses grew wild,
and maintained themselves under natural
conditions unswamped by intercrossing
with the stock from which they came.
By all the rules of logic, half-a-dozen
plants or animals of a new variety breed-
ing freely with a hundred times their
numbers of the older sort ought short-
ly to disappear. The reason why they
do not is that a discontinuous variant
is likely to transmit its peculiarity com-
pletely, or else not at all. Though Dar-
win knew this in a general way, the first
accurate statement of the matter, like
many another fertile idea, came from
Mr. Francis Galton. Galton pointed out
long ago that there are at least three
kinds of heredity, shown conveniently
in the transmission of coat-color among
horses. If a pure white horse is mated
with a pure black one, the colt may fol-
low one parent to the exclusion of the
other, and be entirely black or entirely
white, the missing color remaining la-
tent, to appear, perhaps, in a subsequent
generation. This is alternative or discon-
tinuous inheritance. The latent quality
is now termed " recessive ; " the other
" dominant." Or the colt may fuse com-
pletely the parental qualities and be gray,
— blended or continuous inheritance.
Or it may exhibit both colors unblend-
ed, as a black and white piebald, —
particulate or mosaic inheritance. The
observer of mankind will easily recall a
sufficiency of cases of the two extreme
sorts. We expect children to be blends
of the diverse qualities of their parents,
and usually do find them a hodgepodge
of ancestral characters, — the nose of one,
the temper of another, on the average
copying their forbears in due propor-
tion ; but as to separate qualities, the
heirs of single individuals. Striking
physical peculiarities and unusual mental
gifts are thought to be very liable to en-
tail, and to come down through half-a-
dozen generations unblended and unim-
paired. Good cases of mosaic inherit-
ance are not so common. Eye-color is
almost always a discontinuous heritage,
but once in a while an iris is flecked
with two colors, or marked with two con-
centric bands, and, more rarely, the two
eyes of a pair are not mates.
All these facts had, of course, been
known time out of mind. Galton, how-
ever, analyzed the matter and provided a
terminology. He also taught the world
not to mix the evidence for different
sorts of inheritance, and he formulated
his Law of Ancestral Heredity, the most
important contribution to the theory of
the subject up to the last year of the
nineteenth century. With that year came
the final discovery which was to gather
up and interpret a thousand scattered
facts, the final chapter of a story which
began a generation before.
Gregor Mendel was Abbot of Brilnn
in Moravia when Darwin was at work on
the Origin. He does not appear to have
had any unusual interest in the problem
of evolution ; indeed, his main concern
was with an essentially pre-Darwinian
question, — the nature of plant hybrids.
With this problem as an avocation from
his serious clerical duties, the abbot busied
himself in the garden of his cloister ;
a leisurely, clear-headed, middle-aged
churchman in whom a great scientist was
spoiled. For eight years he experimented
with varieties of the common pea, and
in 1865 communicated to the Society of
Naturalists in Brtlnn the substance of the
discovery which is hereafter to be known
as Mendel's Law, " the greatest discov-
ery in biology since Darwin." Unfortu-
Some Recent Aspects of Darwinism.
519
nately, at that time, the Brilnn Society,
like the rest of the world, had other
things on its mind. The controversy
over Darwin and avolution was then
merrily under way, and the world
promptly forgot the one thing which was
needed to complete Darwin's work. He,
it is clear, never saw Mendel's paper.
If he had, a good many books would
have remained unwritten. Mendel him-
self appears never to have understood
the full value of his own idea. Except
for one short paper written in 1869 he
made no effort to follow the matter out,
and devoted the remaining twenty years
of his life to theology and the weather, —
fields where his great talent for experi-
ment could hardly have had free vent.
He died in 1884 with no suspicion that,
within twenty years, his modest paper
would stand alongside of Animals and
Plants and Natural Inheritance, and him-
self, as a student of heredity, with Dais
win and Gallon. Somehow or other,
Mendel's discovery escaped attention un-
til four years ago, when De Vries reached
it independently. Two years later Mr.
Bateson, who had been among the first to
realize its significance, made a translation
of the two original papers ; this, together
with his somewhat hasty commentary, is
the basis of Professor Morgan's excellent
though brief account, and, in part, of Dr.
Vernon's less satisfactory one. Since
then, Mendel's Law has been found to
hold for a considerable number of cases,
both among animals and plants, but
most unaccountably not to work for a few
others ; so that, as yet, no one knows how
nearly universal it may prove to be, nor
how it is to be reconciled with the older
Law of Ancestral Heredity of Galton.
Its latest important aspect is an ingen-
ious attempt to apply it to the inheritance
of that commonest and most obscure of
all discontinuities, — sex.
One illustration will serve to make
clear the practical workings of Men-
del's principle. If a single rough-coated
guinea-pig of either sex be introduced
into a colony of normal smooth-coated
individuals, all its offspring of the first
generation will be rough-coated like it-
self. In the next generation, if one of
the parents is smooth and the other
rough, the young will be half of one sort
and half of the other, but if both parents
are rough, three quarters will take the
" dominant " rough coat. In the next,
and all subsequent generations, one half
of those rough-coated individuals which
had one smooth-coated grandparent, and
one third of those which had two smooth-
coated grandparents, which were not
mated, will drop out the " recessive "
smooth-coatedness, and become, in all re-
spects, like their original rough-coated
progenitor, even to having only rough-
coated young, no matter what their mates
may have. Thus Mendel's Law, though
by no means simple, is very precise.
The essential part of his great discovery
is that in each generation of plants or
animals of mixed ancestry, a definite
proportion lose one half of their mingled
heritage, and revert, in equal numbers,
to one or other of the pure types. As
a corollary to this there is also the dis-
covery that there may be, as among our
guinea-pigs, two sorts of individuals,
alike in outward appearance, but funda-
mentally different in having or lacking
a latent quality which, when it exists,
becomes patent again in a fixed propor-
tion of their offspring. Apparently in
about one case out of two in which Men-
del's Law holds, the new quality or organ
of a mutation is " dominant " over the
old one, like the rough coat of the guinea-
pig over the smooth, and thereby gets a
fair chance to prove its fitness for sur-
vival.
If Darwin had only known this, how
easily he would have disposed of objec-
tions based on the swamping effects of
intercrossing !
The reader who follows out at length
in the pages of our two authors the case
which I have outlined here, and realizes
that, in spite of all logic, common varia-
520
Some Recent Aspects of Darwinism.
tions are seized upon by Natural Selec-
tion, and uncommon ones not swamped,
should be convinced that the horns of the
old dilemma are neither so long nor so
sharp as they were, and that — always
pace the Semi-Darwinian — one set of
objections which used to be urged against
Darwinism can now be fairly met. But
the reader of Professor Morgan will not
go very far before he discovers that the
Origin of Species by means of Discon-
tinuous Variation is, for him, no part of
Darwinism.
Professor Morgan is always a formi-
dable dialectician, and when he gets to
running amuck through Sexual Selection,
Germinal Selection, Protective Colora-
tion, Mimicry, and the rest, one comes to
realize how insecure are the foundations
of some parts of our evolutionary science.
Here is his unflattering opinion of Sexual
Selection : —
"It is not shown in a single one of
the instances that the postulated cause
has really had anything to do with the
difference in question ; and the attempt
to show that the theory is probable, by
pointing out the large number of cases
which it appears to account for, is weak-
ened to a very great degree by the num-
ber of exceptional cases, for which an
equally ready explanation of a different
kind is forthcoming."
Weismann, anent the Indian butterfly,
Kallima, which looks almost exactly like
a leaf, and is the stock case of Protective
Mimicry, gets this shrewd thrust : —
"Thus the philosopher in his closet
multiplies and magnifies the difficulties
for which he is about to offer a panacea.
Had the same amount of labor been spent
in testing whether the life of this butter-
fly is so closely dependent on the exact
imitation of the leaf, we might have been
spared the pains of this elaborate exor-
dium. There are at least some grounds
for suspicion that the whole case of Kal-
lima is ' made up.' If this should prove
true, it will be a bad day for the Dar-
winians, unless they fall back on Weis-
mann's statement that their theory is in-
sufficient to prove a single case."
Unlike Herbert Spencer and others
for whom Natural Selection is inade-
quate, Professor Morgan does not accept
the Inheritance of Acquired Characters ;
so that, if the orthodox Darwinians cut
rather a sorry figure on his pages, the
Lamarckians and other heretics will
hardly feel like grinning at their discom-
fiture.
" These experiments of Brown - S&-
quard, and of those who have repeated
them, may appear to give a brilliant ex-
perimental confirmation of the Lamarck-
ian position ; yet I think, if I were a
JLamarckian, I should feel very uncom-
fortable to have the best evidence in
support of the theory come from this
source, because there are a number of
facts in the results that make them ap-
pear as though they might, after all, be
the outcome of a transmitted disease, as
Weismann claims, rather than the inher-
itance of an acquired character." " Pale-
ontologists have been much impressed
by the fact that Evolution has been along
the lines which we might imagine that
it would follow if the effects of use and
disuse are inherited. . . . But, as has
been said before, it is not this kind of
evidence that the theory is in need of,
since Lamarck himself gave an ample
supply of illustrations. What we need
is clear evidence that this sort of inher-
itance is possible. . . . Why not then
spend a small part of the energy, that
has been used to expound the theory,
in demonstrating that such a thing i
really possible ? One of the chief virtues
of the Lamarckian theory is that it is
capable of experimental verification or
contradiction, and who can be expected
to furnish such proof if not the Neo-La-
marckians ? "
Now while much of this criticism is
admirable, coming like a fresh wind of
common sense and reality through a re-
gion of tinsel and gaslight, much of it
also serves but to suggest that in Science,
Notes on the Scarlet Letter.
521
as in Theology, the inclusive Catholic
doctrine splits up into the creeds of war-
ring sects, when one article or another is
unduly emphasized.
Darwin taught that species arise some-
times by the selection of one kind of
variation, or the other, or both ; some-
times by the inheritance of acquired
characters ; sometimes by the direct in-
fluence of environment ; sometimes by
discontinuous variation without selec-
tion ; and was quite ready to admit any
other factor for which there might be
evidence in any particular case. Weis-
mann, Wallace, and the Neo-Darwin-
ians, finding that Selection is a good ex-
planation in a large number of cases,
straightway conclude that it is the only
factor, and are prepared to excommuni-
cate everybody who agrees with Darwin.
The Neo-Lamarckians,on the other hand,
finding that the direct influence of the
environment and the inheritance of ac-
quired characters are often the better
explanations, decide that selection is of
no particular importance, and set them-
selves to account for the world without
it. Finally enter Morgan, De Vries, and
the believers in the new Theory of Mu-
tations, — which is not so very new, —
who, because Nature does get ahead per
saltum, are ready to shake off the dust
of their feet at Neo-Darwinians and Neo-
Lamarckians alike.
However, Professor Morgan is no very
violent sectary, and, having once flung
selection out at the door, is quite willing
to let it in again through the window in
half-a-dozen scattered sentences like this,
which really concede the whole case :
" From this point of view it may appear,
at first thought, that the idea of evolu-
tion through mutations involves a fun-
damentally different view from that of
the Darwinian school of selection ; but
in so far as selection also depends on the
spontaneous appearance of fluctuating
variations, the same point of view is to
some extent involved, — only the steps
are supposed to be smaller." As if that,
after all, were of any great consequence !
I venture, therefore, to interpret the Mu-
tation Theory as a wholesome reaction
against the extreme Selectionism of Weis-
mann, and one sign that the world is com-
ing back to the more moderate and saner
Darwinism of Darwin. Nevertheless,
when all is said, Natural Selection, in
some form or other, would be a logi-
cal necessity if it were not a matter of
fact. Though the future should discover
a thousand factors of organic evolution
Natural Selection would still be one of
them, and Professor Morgan, or any-
body else, who attempts to account for
the living world without it, will find that,
like Alice in the Looking-Glass Country,
when he thinks he has at last got out of
sight of the house, he is just walking in
at the front door.
E. T. Brewster.
NOTES ON THE SCARLET LETTER.
THE trouble with those who deny
Shakespeare's authorship of the plays
usually ascribed to him is that they can-
not believe in a miracle. How can this
great thing come out of Warwickshire,
— a hundred miles away from London,
— this son of a wool-comber, this truant
deer-stealer who never saw Oxford, yet
writing plays such as the world had not
heard before nor has heard since? It
was a miracle indeed, but of the kind
that is all the while happening in a world
that is greatly in need of what a miracle
only can yield. For genius is a mira-
cle; that is, it is inexplicable. Balzac, in
the preface of Le Pere Goriot, says that
522
Notes on the Scarlet Letter.
" chance is the great romance-maker of
the ages." It might be said that it also
makes the romancers, for they appear
as by chance, — unheralded and without
apparent cause. Here is this boy Haw-
thorne, born in Salem a century ago,
son of generations of shipmasters, not a
touch of genius in ancestors or kindred,
in a community absorbed in commercial-
ism and at that time singularly free from
any flame at which genius could kindle
its torch. At the age of fourteen he goes
to Maine to reside with an uncle for a
time ; returns to Salem and prepares for
Bowdoin College, where he has Longfel-
low as a classmate and Franklin Pierce
as a friend. He proves to be an indiffer-
ent scholar, and shows no signs of genius,
unless it be an undue love of solitude and
a brooding disposition that might argue
either dullness or unusual intelligence.
Genius has no clear signs. Nothing her-
alds it, and it has no true authentication
until it does some work that stamps it as
its own.
The authentication came late with
Hawthorne. Three years after gradu-
ation in 1825, he published anonymously
a short novel — Fanshawe — that had no
sale, and was so slightly regarded by him-
self that he destroyed most of the first
edition, with the result that not more
than five copies are in existence. It had,
however, the touch that is the peculiar
charm of his later writings. For the
next ten or twelve years he produced
almost nothing, at least nothing commen-
surate with the long period of time and
apparent leisure. Yet, he regarded lit-
erature as his vocation, and was striving
to live by his pen. He wrote a group of
seven short stories which he burned, with
how much wealth of genius in them we
do not know. That they were rejected
by seventeen publishers is no sign that
they lacked this subtle quality. Nothing
is so elusive and so shy of recognition as
genius, for the simple reason that there
is no rule by which it can be measured.
The publishers have a little mathemati-
cal machine by which they can, in a mo-
ment, tell you how many printed pages
will be required for your bulky pile of
manuscript ; but they have not yet found
a machine that will measure or even de-
tect the presence of that imponderable
and unmeasurable thing called genius.
The only approach to such a machine is
some rare human being who happens
(and here the miracle again comes in)
to have a spark of it — latent or active
— in his own composition. Doubtless
these seven tales were full of the quali-
ties that give priceless value to the few
stories that are left. Nor is it strange
that he did not himself detect the divine
spark that glowed within them. Genius
is like the eye which sees all things
except itself. Hawthorne had a way
of burning his productions whenever the
hour of weakness or self -distrust — such
as often visits men of genius — came
to him. Mr. James T. Fields told the
writer — in the sixties — that Haw-
thorne, having got well into the Scarlet
Letter, invited him to Salem to hear it
read. Hawthorne was disposed to de-
stroy it, and that might have been its
fate had not Mr. Fields, who, better than
any man of his day, knew a book when
he saw one, interposed with a publisher's
authority, and so saved one which Mr.
Woodberry — Hawthorne's latest bio-
grapher — says is u a great and unique
romance, standing apart by itself in fic-
tion ; there is nothing else quite like it."
There is but little to tell of him bio-
graphically ; and far less concerning his
inner life ; or, this would be the case
were it not that a writer who deals chiefly
with the human soul, and spreads it out
in scores of characters, cannot fail also
to reveal himself. He was shy to the
last degree, and he early formed what he
called " a cursed habit of solitude ; " but
the accuracy with which he uncovers the
hidden working of the hearts of others
becomes a mirror in which his own heart
is pictured. At first, one is inclined to
think him a cold, impassive writer, whc
Notes on the Scarlet Letter.
523
holds the mirror up to Nature, — himself
simply steadying it while the artist looks
through, and declares what he sees. But
a full reading somewhat alters one's
opinion of him. It does not follow that
the recluse is indifferent to humanity ;
he may be simply less gregarious, or he
has less need of others, or finds his best
development in solitude, or is called to
some task that requires a steady gaze at
certain types of life without disturbing
them with spoken words. It is easy to
say that had Hawthorne's contact with
the world been closer, and had he been
reared in a richer and more complex so-
ciety, his writings would have been less
sombre and more varied in their themes.
Mr. Henry James — his severest critic
while a great admirer — grants that the
simplicity of his life was in his favor ;
" it helped him to appear complete and
homogeneous." But when Mr. James
seems to limit him by declaring that he
is " intensely and vividly local," one
pauses to ask if local color hinders uni-
versality of treatment. He had the in-
dependence and originality of his own
genius, but he found his subjects in New
England. His chief theme was the play
of conscience under a sense of sin and
guilt. Now, nothing is truer than that
this theme had wide illustration in New
England, and especially in its theology,
where it was an organic factor. The
reality of sin ; its destructive effect on
character ; its doomlike aspect ; the hor-
rible certainty of its result ; the im-
possibility of escape from it except by
a special and personal decree of God ;
the haunting misery of it, fed by uncer-
tainty as to escape ; the tragedy that not
seldom sprang out of it in every com-
munity, — all this was familiar to Haw-
thorne ; but it is a singular fact that,
while treating the generic truth, he never
seriously touches the prevalent theologi-
cal aspects of it. It is not the sin, nor
the guilt, nor the reprobation of the New
England theology exclusively that yields
him his themes. Had he established a
closer relation to it in his plots, he might
almost have been claimed as an adherent
or a critic of it. But he cannot be lo-
cated in that region of thought. Neither
sin, nor guilt, nor remorse, belongs ex-
clusively to the Puritan, nor to any the-
ology, though wrought into all. They
belong to humanity as parts of its uni-
versal problem, and it is as such that
Hawthorne treated them. Thus he es-
caped the charge of provincialism. It
is no derogation to admit that he was, in
one sense, provincial, — like Burns and
Scott, — but his genius was adequate to
his standing in the broad field of univer-
sal humanity in company with the great
masters of it.
Why did Hawthorne choose this one
theme, — sin and its consequences, —
hardly putting pen to paper except to
set down something bearing on it ? He
was not what is usually termed a reli-
gious man ; that note was not fully ac-
centuated in him ; though what depths
of spiritual feeling were hidden in that
never-revealed heart let no man attempt
to measure. Nor did he take an interest
in the theological debates that clustered
about sin. Orthodox and Unitarian were
one or nothing with him ; their conten-
tions will pass, — his remain as new and
as old as humanity. He took no interest
in reforms, and held himself aloof from
every practical question of social life and
activity except when forced to it by the
necessity of a livelihood, — for until he
was forty-six chill penury was his lot.
Why, then, did he choose sin as his theme ?
For the same reason that the great mas-
ters in literature always gravitate to it.
The Hebrews put it into the first pages
of their sacred books. Job chose it, and
set a pace often followed but not yet
overtaken. The Greeks built their drama
upon it. Shakespeare and Goethe could
not justify their genius except as over
and over again they dealt with it. Dante
put it under heaven and hell and all be-
tween. Milton could find no theme ade-
quate to his genius but " man's first dis-
524
Notes on the Scarlet Letter.
obedience." Shall we say, then, that a
great genius makes sin his theme because
it suits his purpose as an artist ? Let us
not so belie him. He takes it because it
is the greatest theme, and also because it
falls in either with his convictions as in
the case of Milton, or with his tempera-
ment as in the case of Hawthorne. And
why is it great ? Because it is a violation
of the order of the world, and is the de-
feat of humanity. It throws human na-
ture wide open to our gaze ; we look on
the ruin and see man's greatness ; on his
misery, and so uncover pity, which be-
comes a redeeming force. Thus it opens
the whole wide play of human life in its
highest and deepest relations. Nothing
so interests men as their sins and defeats.
Tragedy is born of them, and tragedy
fixes evermore the steady gaze of man-
kind. Genius is its own interpreter ; it
makes few mistakes. Hawthorne wrote
four novels and seven or eight short sto-
ries, all turning on sin, and he never errs
in its analysis, its operation, or its effect,
— though he stops short of finality. His
characters are infallibly true to them-
selves. He is always logical. The envi-
ronment suits the case down to slightest
details. Nature conforms to the tragedy,
either illuminating or darkening the play
as it goes on, but always with rigid fidel-
ity. His entire work is bathed in truth.
Never does he weaken its absoluteness
by introducing his personal belief, though
occasionally, in his Note-Books, he gives
us a glimpse of himself, like this : " When
I write anything that I know or suspect
to be morbid, I feel as though I had told
a lie."
He has no theory of his own ; it is
the same old story: eating forbidden
fruit ; hiding from God ; losing Paradise ;
tempted of woman ; tempted of Satan ;
tempted of Mammon ; sowing to the
flesh and reaping corruption ; a deceived
heart feeding on ashes ; death the wages
of sin, — and no clear glimpse of a way
out. If stated in modern phrase, it would
be this : whatever a man does, he does to
himself. There is no profounder trut
in morals or religion, or in life than this
The Puritan theology obscured it in it
doctrine of sin and of redemption. Bot
were weakened by over-localization out
side of the man himself — putting sin it
the progenitor of the race, and redemj
tion into imputation and an expiatoi
process. However uncertainly these dc
trines are held to-day, they still cast
blinding shadow upon ethics, and make
it difficult to persuade men that whatsc
ever they sow they shall reap.
It is enough to say of Hawthorne, at
this point, that nowhere in literature is
this truth taught more clearly, — wit
such freedom from the alloy of dogmatic
obscuration, with such absence of per
sonal prejudice, — one might almost saj
of feeling, — with such solemnity, sue
tragic force and poetic beauty, and, above
all, such closeness to life, as are to
found in these four novels and the stories
We will take a closer look at the gres
est of them. What shall be said of
Scarlet Letter ; where shall it be k
ed in the realm of Letters ? It is not
love story, nor a romance, nor an alleg
ry, nor a parable, nor a historical novel
though it has something of each,
comes near being a dogma set in tei
of real life, and made vivid by inter
action ; but Hawthorne cared nothinj
for dogma of any sort. What then si
it be called ? It must go without cl
fication. It is a study of a certain for
of sin made graphic by conditions bes
calculated to intensify each featu
Mrs. Hawthorne said that during
six months he was writing it, his for
head wore a knot. So will the reader's
if he reads as carefully as Hawthon
wrote.
It was published in 1850, when Haw-
thorne was forty-six years of age. It hz
first of all, this distinction : it is — as Mr.
James says — " the finest piece of ima
native writing yet put forth in the coi
try." In the half-century since, a
Notes on the Scarlet Letter.
525
and full American literature has been
produced ; authors of high merit have
secured a lasting place ; and others of
less merit have given us works of fiction
that sell almost by the million, but none
that are worthy to stand by the side of this
short story of sin and shame and remorse.
What is claimed for it in this country is
freely accorded abroad, though, of course,
no comparisons are made with the long
annals of English literature, where there
are names that defy comparison. It is,
however, read more widely there than
here, and is held in steadier estimate than
we accord, who read as gregariously as
sheep crop the grass. We simply state
the consensus in which it is held in our
American world of letters when we say
that it is the most consummate work in
literature yet produced in this country.
The explanation of the permanent
high estimate of the Scarlet Letter —
for it would be as safe to wager on it as
on the Bank of England — is the absolute
perfection of its art and corresponding
subtilty and correctness of thought, and,
not least, a style that both fascinates and
commands. If it is criticised on slight
points, — as that it has too much sym-
bolism, that the story is mixed with
parable, and the like, — we grant or deny
as we see fit ; but we brush all this aside,
we turn to the book again and close it
with a sigh, or something deeper than a
sigh, — even thought, and pronounce it
perfect.
It is a simple story, told of a simple
age, Greek in its severity, having only
four characters : a wife forgetful of her
vows ; a clergyman forgetful of more
than his vows ; a wronged husband, left
in England, but brought forward ; a lit-
tle child, — these and no more, save the
people, individually unimportant, but ne-
cessary to form a background for the
tragedy. Boston is not yet half a cen-
tury old, Puritan to the core, hot still
with a hatred of the tyranny and sin it
had crossed the ocean to escape, governed
by the letter of Scripture wherein was
found the command that an adulteress
should die. But some mercy had begun
to qualify the Hebrew code, and instead
of death or branding with a hot iron,
Hester Prynne was condemned to stand
upon the pillory-platform, wearing upon
her breast the letter A wrought in scar-
let, not only then, but ever after. With
her babe in her arms she faces the peo-
ple, and sees her husband among them,
— an old and learned man, — who un-
expectedly appears and takes his place
as an avenger. The real history of the
tragedy begins when the young minis-
ter, Mr. Dimmesdale, is required by the
magistrate to appeal to Hester to reveal
the partner of her guilt. Dimmesdale
is at no time in the story represented
as wholly contemptible. However sin-
ful his characters may be, Hawthorne al-
ways clothes them with a certain human
dignity. From the first he is the victim
of his sin, — suffering the tortures of re-
morse to a degree impossible to Hester,
because to the first sin he added that of
concealment and hypocrisy by continu-
ing in his holy office ; and, heavier than
all, was the sense that he was dragging
the cause, in both church and state, for
which the colony was founded, down to
the level of his own degradation. It
was not for this that Hester, when ad-
jured by him, refused to make the decla-
ration for which he called, but for love
only. The story, at the outset, is lifted
out of all carnality. Shame and remorse
have burned up that dross, until in time
only the capacity to suffer is left, while in
her heart love remains, — pure always,
and made purer by acquiescence in her
punishment and the discipline of mother-
hood. The story moves on, most human,
but inexorable as fate. The scarlet let-
ter on Hester's breast almost ceases to
do its office. A sense of desert and un-
dying love and pity make her shame
endurable. But Dimmesdale finds no
relief. The scarlet letter burns itself into
his flesh, and he dies in late confession
for love, if not for his soul.
526
Notes on the Scarlet Letter.
It would be difficult to find elsewhere
so close an analysis of the play of the
soul in the supreme moments of life
as that of the leading characters, — all
brought to the logical conclusion of their
history. The blending of spiritual in-
sight and literary art forms one of those
triumphs the like of which one may look
for in vain until one reaches the great
masters in drama. It also suggests a
problem in theology that has vexed the
souls of men from the beginning, and
will continue to vex them so long as sin
and conscience stand opposed to each
other. The problem is that of forgive-
ness : is it ever fully won ? The plot
goes no further than their contrasted des-
tiny. The curtain drops when the chief
actor dies. If here and there it is lifted
for a moment, or swept aside by some
gust of irrepressible grief, it springs
from hope, not from the main purpose.
It is in Hester that riddance from sin
comes nearest a possibility. Her accept-
ance and patient endurance of her pen-
alty, without suffering it wholly to break
her heart or her will, become a natural
and real atonement that yields, if not
peace, something of more value. The
current of her life ran on in its natural
channel in the light of day, before the
eyes of the people. The contrast at the
last between her strength and his weak-
ness was not between a strong woman
and a weak man, — each such by na-
ture, — but between them as each came
to be under the discipline of the seven
years of experience so differently borne.
Dimmesdale was not originally a weak
man ; had he been, the story would have
lost point and emphasis, and would have
sunk to the level of a vulgar scandal of
every-day life. Hawthorne quickly lifts
the narrative out of that region, and con-
fines it to the world where only moral and
spiritual forces fill the stage. But under
the concealment of his sin Dimmesdale
gave way at every point ; all the sources
of his strength were dried up by the hy-
pocrisy in which he had wrapped him-
self, and he grew steadily weaker, while
Hester gained a certain robustness of wil
without loss of her love. Hawthorn*
here comes very near preaching. Indee(
he seldom does anything else ; it is the
function of genius to preach. Give hir
a text, put on him the Geneva gown, am
you have a preacher of universal ortho-
doxy fulfilling his calling with awful
veracity.
But Hawthorne will not allow the
tragedy to sink into the hopelessness of
reprobation, — not that he cared for the
doctrine one way or the other, but, as an
interpreter of evil and as a literary ar
tist, he could not leave Dimmesdale al
solutely where his sin placed him ; for,
in one character, he saw that evil, simply
because it is evil, is a mystery, and as
an artist he could not map out human
passion in mathematical lines. It had
stripped Dimmesdale of all that was best
obscured his judgment, defeated his love,
blinded him to the distinction between
good and evil, overthrown his will, in-
volved his body in the sin of his soul,
and brought him to the verge of death ;
but something is left that revives as soor
as he clasps the hand of his child, and
— leaning on Hester — he mounts the
scaffold where she at first had stood alone
and taken on herself the punishment he
should have shared with her. Under his
decision to confess he revives, and begins
to move aright. The scene changes.
Each character is transformed. Confes
sion begins to do its work. A far step
is taken in the next word : '"Is not this
better,' murmured he, ' than what w€
dreamed of in the forest ? ' " — meaning
flight together, at Hester's suggestion,
for his sake. Here he regains something
of himself ; better to die a true man than
to flee a false one. Hester can see the
matter in but one light. She had slow-
ly worked out a conscious redemptioi
through " shame, despair, and solitude."
She had not sunk to his depth, and she
could not rise to the height to whicl
confession was lifting him. She cannc
Notes on the Scarlet Letter,
527
escape the constraint of her love and
pity. She had freed herself ; she thought
she could free him. " ' I know not,' she
replied. ' Better ? yea : so we may both
die, and little Pearl die with us ! ' ' In
Hester the passion of love dominates ;
let it be death if we can die together;
but in him the passion of a soul achiev-
ing deliverance from sin in the only pos-
sible way is stronger, and he is ready
to die even if it be alone. He exults in
the confession he is about to make before
the people. It is the fifty-first Psalm
over again. Had Hawthorne read St.
Augustine ? Or was it the insight of
genius brooding in long silence on the
way of a guilty soul emerging from the
hell of measureless sin ? Nowhere does
Hawthorne rise so high in tragic skill
and power as in the confession that fol-
lows when Dimmesdale uncovers his
breast and shows burnt into his flesh the
letter Hester had worn openly upon her
bosom. Here are the stigmata of the
early saints, brought out by sin instead
of by self-absorption in the crucified One.
The final and only atonement is made,
and he sinks upon the scaffold to die.
Forgiving his tormentor whom he had
wronged, he turns to his child where the
tragedy completes itself.
Pearl is the one consummate flower of
Hawthorne's genius, — unsurpassed by
himself and absolutely original. There
is woven into her the entire history of
these two suffering but diverse souls,
which she must fulfill and yet preserve
her perfect childhood. She sets forth
the sin of her parents without a trace of
its guilt, yet reflects the moral chaos in
which it had involved her. This is done
with matchless art : — "an elf child," the
people called her, passing from one mood
to another as though a double nature,
an Undine as yet without soul, but rest-
less because it is withheld ; or, as Mr.
Dimmesdale himself had described her,
having no " discoverable principle of be-
ing save the freedom of a broken law ; "
and there is added a far-reaching word :
" whether capable of good, I know not."
Hawthorne does not here hint at inher-
itance of natural disposition, but has in
mind a possible transmission of the con-
fusion springing out of a violation of the
moral order. It was not a dream of hu-
man love that passed into her being, but
something stronger than love.
His thought here runs very deep. This
child of guilty passion inherited not the
passion, but a protesting conscience that
always put her at odds with herself.
As Chillingworth was the malignant
conscience that destroyed Dimmesdale,
Pearl was the natural conscience that
wholesomely chastened her mother so
long as the inevitable penalty lasted.
This ministration is strikingly brought
out in the profoundest chapter of the
book, where Hester's inner life is dis-
closed. One is tempted, as one follows
it, to ask if Hawthorne suffered his own
thoughts to wander into the region where
the question of woman's place and rights
in human society was undergoing heated
discussion. The din of it filled his ears
unless he closed them, as he usually did
when anything like reform met them.
But in this tender and sympathetic chap-
ter he tells where Hester's thoughts often
led her, and where she surely would have
followed them had she been free to ful-
fill her dreams. It certainly was where
his thoughts would not have gone. But
as in Tennyson's Princess a child solved
the problem, so here Pearl and mother-
hood dispelled her dreams and kept her
within the lines of natural duty. In
every case Pearl dominates the situation,
whether she be regarded as a symbolized
conscience or as a child. The story
throughout is a drama of the spirit ; the
real and the spiritual play back and
forth with something more than met-
aphor, for each is both real and spirit-
ual. She is woven with endless symbol-
ism into every page ; from the first wail
in the prison where she was born, the
child sets the keynote and keeps it to
the end. The brook in the forest ran
528
Notes on the Scarlet Letter.
through black shadows and through sun-
shine, and babbled in two voices. " ' What
does this sad little brook say, mother ? '
inquired she. ' If thou hadst a sorrow
of thine own, the brook might tell thee
of it, even as it is telling me of mine.' "
Here is a sermon in running brooks deep-
er than the Duke heard, — the response
of nature to the inner spirit of man.
But this contradiction that ran through
the child passes away as soon as the
purpose of confession enters the heart
of Dimmesdale, whom before she had
shunned so long as he and her mother
talked of flight. As the two meet upon
the scaffold after treading their bitter
but diverse paths, and become spiritually
one through this confession, the child
mingles her life with theirs through the
truth that now invests them, and proves
that " she has a heart by breaking it."
Here we have the purest idealism, Greek
in the delicacy of its allusions, and He-
brew in its ethical sincerity. What
Hawthorne has in mind all along is that
a sin involving hypocrisy can in no way
be undone or gotten over except by con-
fession, and so getting back into the
truth. Dramatic art requires that it
shall involve all the actors, — Chilling-
worth as well as Hester. Though a
wronged husband, he was fiendish in his
revenge, and as false as Dimmesdale.
Any other writer of Romance would
have hurled him to a doom of fire or
flood. But Hawthorne has other uses
for him. He is the malignant conscience
of Dimmesdale as Pearl is the beneficent
conscience of Hester. All the dramatis
personae must be subdued into the like-
ness of the common motive ; and so Haw-
thorne places Chillingworth on the scaf-
fold, where the mingled atmosphere of
unconquerable love and repentance en-
folds him. He calls it a defeat ; " thou
hast escaped me," he said to Dimmes-
dale ; but it was more than defeat. Haw-
thorne leaves room for the thought at
least that something of good found its
way into his poor soul and stayed there.
We must acquit Hawthorne here, and
on every other page of his works, fror
aiming at mere effect, but we cannot fail
to see that in this last scene he come
near losing himself and letting his pitj
carry him beyond the point where the
logic of his story left Dimmesdale ; for
to have wholly absolved him from his sir
would have carried the writer beyonc
his purpose to unfold the working oi
broken law, — a thing not to be tamperec
with by an over-sympathetic pen. Haw-
thorne was neither a skeptic, nor a pes-
simist, nor a cold-hearted man ; he ws
widely the reverse of each. It was the
intensity of his faith in the moral laws
and in the reality of goodness, and the
delicacy and strength of his sympathy,
that made him capable of writing in at
unfailing strain of justice tempered, but
not set aside, by pity.
But behind these qualities was
artistic sense, which — in a great man —
is one with his power and insight, and
he could write only what he saw and
knew ; for art is authoritative. Tennyson
was once asked why he did not give In
Memoriam a happier ending, — a Para-
diso with its vision of God instead of a
great hope only. He replied, " I have
written what I have felt and known, and
I will never write anything else." Haw-
thorne could say the same of himself ;
and we might add that his sense of art,
as well as his sense of truth, held him in
leash. His reserve, however tempera-
mental, is a sign of his consummate skill
as a literary artist. On what page, ii
what sentence, does he fall short ? The
reader turns over the last page and fe
verishly demands the next scene in tl
tragedy, but finds only hints or nothing
at all ; the characters sink back int
the mystery from which they emerget
They move like spirits in a world ui
real except as their truth makes it res
Hence their intangibleness ; they haunt
one in the guise of the quality they se
forth, but beyond that they do not exist
They stand for no person, but only fc
Notes on the Scarlet Letter.
529
some law — kept or broken — which
they symbolize. There is no Dimmes-
dale, nor Hester, nor Pearl, nor Chilling-
worth, but only shadows of broken law
working out its consequences in ways of
penalty wrought into the Eternal Order.
They stay but a moment, and — like a
faded pageant — disappear ; but while
they stay, the deepest meanings of life
are set before us in forms of transcendent
power, and become permanent in our-
selves.
This ready impartation of ideas is
everywhere a marked feature of Haw-
thorne's works, due to the absolute sin-
cerity of their ethical elements, their per-
fection of literary form, and their per-
vasive humanity. To doubt the last
factor is to rob his genius of its main-
spring. The severity of his treatment
grows out of the accuracy of his logic.
He deals with mystery and, therefore,
says little, only enough to show that
whatever a man does he does to himself ;
that obedience is light, and disobedience
is darkness in which, because nothing
can be seen, there is nothing to be said.
Still, Hawthorne does not hold it to be
contrary to his opinions or his art to suf-
fer gleams of hope to illumine even the
darkest of his pages. With a masterly
touch at the very beginning of the Scar-
let Letter, he expressly states this to be
a feature of the story he is about to tell.
He puts by the door of the prison, where
Hester was confined, " a wild rosebush,"
and says, " it may serve, let us hope, to
symbolize some sweet moral blossom,
that may be found along the track, or
relieve the darkening close of a tale of
human frailty and sorrow." Therefore,
in the last scene there are almost fore-
casts of a good outcome. " In the child
the spell that drove her apart from her
father is broken, and with tears she kisses
his dying lips. Hester raises the un-
conquerable question of love : " ' Shall
we not spend our immortal life together ?
Thou lookest far into eternity with those
bright dying eyes ! Then tell me what
VOL. xcni. — NO. 558. 34
thou seest ? ' ' Hester was mistaken.
Her cleansed eyes could see, but his could
not with any certainty ; he had lived in
the dark too long for clear vision. And
yet Hawthorne will not hide the end be-
hind so dark a pall. The rose at the
prison door blossoms into a hope. The
moralizing of the great master is not for-
gotten : " There is some soul of goodness
in things evil." Dimmesdale remembers
that there is recovery through suffering,
and that it is a sign of mercy. Having set
his ignominy before the people, his death
becomes triumphant, and he departs with
words of praise and submission. Still,
Hawthorne will neither assert nor deny,
but leaves each to read the story in his
own way.
It is not well to look for a doctrine in
this masterly and carefully balanced pic-
ture. Hawthorne did not intend one ;
he drew from a broader field than that
of dogma. One may hope where one can-
not well believe. Belief is special ; hope
is universal. Dimmesdale stated his
own case correctly, — a confused and con-
flicting statement, because having long
lived a lie its bewildering confusion im-
pregnated all his thought. In Hester life
has done its worst and its best, and, brood-
ed over continually by truth, she emerges
clear-eyed, and sees — shall we say hea-
ven or hell ? — She cared not, so long as
she could be with him. One is here re-
minded of Dante's Francesca in the In-
ferno, " swept about the never resting
blast " of hell with Paolo, — her only
consolation being that they would never
be separated. Mr. Dinsmore, who calls
attention to this resemblance in his able
book, the Teachings of Dante, thinks that
Hawthorne — not having then learned
Italian — came to it alone. It may well
be so, for it is the quality of love to tran-
scend all motives beside its own ; and not
seldom does it cast itself with loss of all
that it has in time or eternity, for so it
chooses, rather than give up itself, — not
voluptuous love, but that spiritual passion
which makes of two souls one. They
530
Notes on the Scarlet Letter.
have no life if they are separated. Such
was Hester's love. Penance had not
weakened, but rather had refined it, until
its spiritual essence only was left with
its commanding power. This Hawthorne
sees by the light of his own genius. But
to unwind the thread of human fault, and
hold it up so that it shall shine in a
brighter color, is a task that he hints at,
but does not attempt.
Still, he touches sin with a firm hand,
and traces it without flinching to the
point where it culminates, — always the
same ; it separates man from God and
his fellows, and at last from himself ; it
returns in retribution, and the evil he has
done to others he does to himself. A
casual reading may set this down as a
Puritan dogma. It is Puritan, but it is
universal before it is Puritan. Haw-
thorne in his greater works touched no-
thing that was only and distinctively
Puritan. His characters wear the garb,
but underneath is simply the human soul.
This distinction is to be made because
it helps to a right understanding of the
book, and redeems both it and its author
from the charge of provincialism, — a
derogation not to be made concerning a
genius whose province lay among themes
as broad and universal as human nature.
Hawthorne put no unmeaning words
into the Scarlet Letter, and the question
may arise how far he intended to include
Chillingworth in the scene of redemption
on the scaffold, — for such it may be
called. The answer must be found in Chil-
lingworth's exclamation : "Thou hast
defeated me ! " Why did he say that ?
Because Dimmesdale had taken himself
out of the world of lies, and put himself
into the hands of the God of truth, and
thus brought not only himself, but all
about him, under the redeeming influ-
ences that filled the air, for even the
people went home, as it were, smiting
their breasts. If the story be a parable,
the harassing conscience must be set at
rest ; it is defeated, and Chillingworth no
longer has a vocation. Dimmesdale had
done what he had advised him to do:
"Wouldst thou have me to believe, 0
wise and pious friend, that a false sho
can be better — can be more for God
glory, or man's welfare — than God
own truth ? " His advice, given in
swer to Dimmesdale's specious palte
ing with an eternal reality, deepened
victim's agony and so fed his revenge
but when acted on, his patient passed
yond his reach. He had gone deep
than he knew, and had brought to t
surface a spiritual power that outm
tered his own. Shall we say that Ha
thorne did not intend to hint that Chi
lingworth came under this greater pow
and that, finding himself a defeated m
through his own suggestion, he felt i
divineness ? He utters no word of m
ice, no confident boast, no plan of
ther revenge. Instead, what else is see
of him is beneficent, and in accord with
a nature originally sound and high-mind-
ed. Along with others, he has been in-
volved in a furious storm of human p;
sion, but it passes by when truth wi
the victory. Hawthorne, like the co
summate artist that he is, never asse
or paints in full, but only intimates an
leaves the rest to the reader ; and so we
may believe that the tragedy pauses at
the door of Chillingworth. At the close
Hawthorne plays uncertainly and with
jest over this strange yet natural charac-
ter. Chillingworth is reduced to nothin
ness and withers away, — a logical en
but he reappears in a new light as enric
ing Hester and Pearl, — a strange thing
to do unless some goodness is left in him.
Then the author jests and sends him
erally to the devil where " he would fin
tasks enough," and receive "his wages
duly." If Hawthorne ever falters it is
when he plays between the Parable and
the Romance. Here he drops the for-
mer, and ends his story — in Walter Scott
fashion — with a word for each. Evi-
dently he writes with a weary pen, yet
not with an unpitying heart. In the next
sentence he would fain be merciful to " all
Notes on the Scarlet Letter.
531
these shadowy beings, so long our near
acquaintances, — as well Roger Chilling-
worth as his companions ; " and finally,
after a bit of psychological byplay, by no
means serious, — on the possible identity
at bottom of hatred and love, — raises the
question whether the old physician and
the minister may not find " their earthly
stock of hatred and antipathy transmit-
ted into golden love." Thus, though the
Scarlet Letter is a sad book, the author
would not leave it black with hopeless
sorrow. Even as an artist Hawthorne
knew better than to paint his canvas in
sober colors only ; and as a man he had
no right to bruise the human heart with
needless pain. Sad as the Scarlet Let-
ter is, we need not think him forgetful of
Madame Necker's saying that " the novel
should paint a possible better world."
But if better, it can be such only through
truth and never through lies.
What renders the Scarlet Letter one
of the greatest of books is the sleuth-
hound thoroughness with which sin is
traced up and down and into every cor-
ner of the heart and life, and even into
nature, where it transforms all things.
Shakespeare paints with a larger brush,
and sets it in great tragic happenings ;
but its windings, the subtle infusion of
itself into every faculty and impressing
itself upon outward things, are left for
Hawthorne's unapproachable skill. This
leads us to speak of the criticism of
Mr. Henry James upon the twelfth chap-
ter, where the story reaches its climax.
Dimmesdale and Hester and Pearl stand
at night upon the scaffold, where Hester
had stood alone with her babe seven
years before. His remorse had reached
its lowest depth ; its sting lay in the fact
that she wore the scarlet letter while he
went clad in robes of unquestioned sanc-
tity. It is the letter that torments him,
and carries the guilt and shame of the
whole bitter history. He has come into
a condition where, because he can think
of nothing else, he can see nothing else.
A meteor flashes across the black sky
and paints upon a cloud the fatal letter.
A page of magnificent writing describes
the objective picture and the heart within
which only it exists. Mr. James regards
it as overworked, and, along with a gen-
eral charge of the same over-doing here
and there, intimates that the author " is
in danger of crossing the line that sepa-
rates the sublime from its intimate neigh-
bor." That Hawthorne should be termed
ridiculous after being described as " a
thin New Englander with a miasmatic
conscience " should occasion no surprise.
It shows how wide apart are the realist
and the idealist ; and also how much
nearer the idealist comes to the facts of
the case in hand.
That Dimmesdale should transfer
what he saw and felt within to the exter-
nal world is a well-known psychological
possibility ; and we appeal from the real-
ist to his brother the psychologist, who
says in his recent book that " it is one
of the peculiarities of invasions from the
sub-conscious region to take on objective
appearances." It is needless to say that
literature, from the Bible down, abounds
in this transfer of inward feeling to out-
ward form. When Balaam had sold his
prophetic gift for a price, it was not the
ass that rebuked him, but his own smiting
conscience. It was not the witches, but
Macbeth, who sang, " Fair is foul, and
foul is fair," — after which all things
were inverted : his thoughts became
ghosts and daggers and a knocking at the
gate like thunders of doom. Lady Mac-
beth can see nothing but blood on her
white hands. Beckford in his Vathek
(where possibly Hawthorne found the
suggestion of Dimmesdale's habit of pla-
cing his hand upon his heart) made the
dwellers in the Hall of Eblis happy in
all things except that each held his hand
over his heart, which had become " a
receptacle of eternal fire." Mr. James
seems to underestimate the mental con-
dition into which Dimmesdale has fallen ;
he strikes the key of the tragedy too low,
532
Notes on the Scarlet Letter.
and refers what he regards as excessive
to Hawthorne's Puritanism. Now, Puri-
tanism is a capacious thing, but it cannot
hold all that is cast into it ; and much
is set down to its credit that belongs to
a false conception of it. Mr. James, in
his able biography, insists on two things,
to which we have already referred, as
explanatory of Hawthorne ; that he was
provincial, and that he was largely in-
fluenced by his Puritan blood. Each
is to be taken with due allowance. Of
course, every man, however great his
genius, strikes his roots down into native
soil and draws his life from such air as
is about him. Something of root and
air will enter into his mental composi-
tion, and in some measure he will think
with or from his environment, and his
heart will throb with ancestral blood.
But it is a quality of genius that it is not
subject to such limitations. Genius be-
longs to the domain of nature ; it is cos-
mic, spiritual, universal. It treats these
limitations in one of three ways : it lifts
them into their ideals ; it transcends
them ; or it extracts their thin essence
or spirit. The last may be said of Haw-
thorne. Little of Puritanism remained
in him except its spirituality, by which
we mean its profound sense of the reality
of moral law. Much that is set down
to him as Puritan was a family idiosyn-
crasy, — an individualism that passed all
the bounds of early or later Puritanism.
It favored, however, the play of his gen-
ius in its chosen field.
To regard him as provincial because
Salem was provincial, or because habits
were simple in Massachusetts in the first
half of the century, is to miss the source
of his strongest quality. Hawthorne, by
virtue of his brooding solitude and the
lofty character of his thought, which was
rooted in his own peculiar genius and
was fed by an imagination that had no
need to go outside of itself for ideas or
theories, was shut off from provincialism
save perhaps in some matters of personal
habit. The nearest sign of it was an in-
tense love of New England and indiffer-
ence to the mother country where he had
lived for years, — an unweaned child of
his native land. There is more in him
that offsets Puritanism than identifies
him with it. In fact, it outdid itself, as
has continually happened, and created in
Hawthorne an individualism that sepa-
rated him from itself. A system whose
central principle is individualism cannot
count upon holding together its own ad-
herents. It is by its own nature centri-
fugal, though none the worse for that ;
it makes man a denizen of the heavens
rather than of this mundane sphere. But
the way is long, and at great cost is it
trod.
It is Hawthorne's peculiarity that he
cannot be identified with any school of
thought. He was a recluse down to the
last fibre. He did not hate men, but he
would not mingle with them. He was
shy, but in a lofty way. Any real alli-
ance in thought or action with others
was impossible to him. His individual-
ism was absolute, but it was tempera-
mental. Socially he was closely iden-
tified with the transcendental way
thinking, but it found no access to
mind. He and Emerson were neighbor
but not intimates. When they walke
together in Concord they discussed the
weather and the crops, but not philosc
phy, nor religion, nor politics. Oftem
they were silent, as great men, whc
know each other as such, can afford
be. Tennyson and Carlyle once sat
gether of an evening for three hour
smoking, and neither uttering a wor
except Carlyle's good-night : " Come
again, Alfred ; we have had a granc
time." This aloofness from men, anc
at the same time this power of draggii
to light the hidden secrets of their soul
is the inexplicable gift of genius ; it has
an eye of its own ; one glance, and it
looks the man through and througl
He mingled frequently with the Noi
Adams frequenters of the village tavei
Notes on the Scarlet Letter.
533
but he was off on the mountain-side,
among the limekilns, weaving the
threads of Ethan Brand. He spent a
year at Brook Farm, but spoke lightly
of its socialism and of his own part as
" chambermaid to the oxen," — a wasted
year, but it gave us the Blithedale Ro-
mance, which Mr. James places at the
head of his works. He hated Socialism,
but Puritanism, its opposite, — being
spiritual and social individualism, — won
in him no following save as it furnished
him standing ground and materials for
his work. Had he lived anywhere where
conscience and law had full recognition
and sin was possible, he would have writ-
ten in the same strain, — as in the Marble
Faun, where Donatello serves his pur-
pose as well as Dimmesdaie. The crime
and its effect in each belong to the gen-
eral field of ethics, where sin reveals its
nature in soul experiences that are com-
mon to all men. Indeed, he has but
one deep and permanent interest: the
play of conscience under sin. He is a
student of the soul. He watches its play
as a biologist watches an animal under
varying conditions ; but in each case it
is the study of a soul, — not degraded,
but only wounded, as it were, and while
it is keen to feel, and while the good
and evil in it are full of primal energy.
It is sometimes said, in halfway dero-
gation of Hawthorne's genius, that his
tales are parables. Why should they
not be so regarded ? It is not easy to
escape the parable, in literature or in
life. What are the world and humanity
but parables of the Eternal Mind ? The
only question in literature is, are the
parables well told ? If they are, the
witness of a vast company of great au-
thors in all ages and tongues is theirs.
Hawthorne was full of dreams, fantasies,
symbols, and all manner of spiritual ne-
cromancy, — turning nature into spirit
and spirit back into nature, but — how-
ever wild the play of his imagination —
the idea underlying it always has three
characteristics : it is real, and true, and
moral. Hence, the Scarlet Letter, — de-
void of history and of probability ; illu-
sive ; nature transformed to create and
to receive meanings ; personality sunk
in ideas and ideas made personal ; so
far away that our hearts do not reach it
with sympathy, and it is read with un-
wet eyes, but with thoughts that lie too
deep for tears ; — still it is one of the
truest and most moral of books, because
the human soul that lies behind it and
plays through it is true to itself whether
it does good or evil. Hawthorne knew
evil under its laws. Neither sentiment,
nor art, nor dogma deflected him from
seeing the thing as it is, and setting
it down with relentless accuracy. His
claim to genius would be impeached if
it were not accurate ; and the reason
why it stands clear and unquestioned is
because no taint of morbidness nor Puri-
tan inheritance lessens the absolute vera-
city of his estimates. Each may have
had something to do with the selection
of his subjects, but nothing whatever
with his own ethical opinions. His lit-
erary art and execution, faultless as they
are, would not alone secure for him the
admiration and reverence of all lovers of
good literature. For, at last, it is truth
alone for which men care ; and truth
only is strong enough to win unques-
tioned and universal verdicts.
And yet he is criticised on the score
that the Scarlet Letter, especially, is
sad, and sometimes it is added that it is
pessimistic. So are Lear and Balzac's
Alkahest sad, but neither deserves the
latter term. Nothing in literature is
pessimistic that accurately describes a
violation of the order of the world and
of human life, if it be in the interest
of truth and justice. Dimmesdaie and
Hester could not escape the pangs they
suffered ; they were not going through
their parts in a world of pessimism, but
in a world of order which they had vio-
lated, and for which they were undergo-
ing inevitable yet redemptive penalty.
There is no pessimism so long as the just
534
Notes on the Scarlet Letter.
laws of society are working normally, —
the very point on which Hawthorne in-
sists, — however hard they are bearing
on the individual. Pessimism is an in-
dictment of the moral order of the world,
and is essential atheism. Hawthorne
stood at the opposite pole. His main
function in literature was to illustrate
the tragical consequences of broken law
when the law was fundamental in char-
acter or in society. He was almost slav-
ishly logical, — putting Dimmesdale into
the lowest hell of the Inferno, and Hes-
ter in Purgatorio, where penalty purities
and makes the sufferer glad.
Absolute as was his insight, and perfect
as was his art, he has not escaped criti-
cism. There is general agreement that
his pages are overcharged with symbol-
ism. But which flower will you uproot in
that garden " of a thousand hues," though
" Narcissus that still weeps in vain "
blossoms too often there ?
Graver criticism is sometimes heard, —
as that he has no sympathy with his
characters in their suffering. So far as
it touches the Scarlet Letter it should be
sufficient refutation to read what he him-
self says in his English Note-Books, in
comparing Thackeray's " coolness in re-
spect to his own pathos," with his own
emotions when he read the last scene of
the Scarlet Letter to his wife, just after
writing it, — " tried to read it rather,
for my voice swelled and heaved, as if
I were tossed up and down on an ocean
as it subsides after a storm."
It is not well to search an author too
closely as to his feeling over the creatures
of his imagination. You may find no-
thing or everything, according to tem-
perament or literary sense. The great
author hides himself behind his canvas.
Hawthorne, the most reticent of men and
with the keenest sense of literary pro-
priety, is the most impersonal of writers
in his greater works. He tells us nothing
except what may be inferred from char-
acteristics constantly recurring through-
out his pages. Now nothing is more re-
vealing in an author than his style ; it
is almost a better witness to his character
than his assertions. It is like the voice
in conversation that speaks from the soul
rather than the mind. There are
Hawthorne's style four invariable fea-
tures, — reverence, sincerity, delicacy,
and humanity ; each is nearly absolute.
Together they stand for heart. No mat-
ter how silently it throbs, a writer who
puts these qualities into his pages is to
be counted as one who pities his fellow
men even when most relentless in tracing
their sins. It may also be set down as
a general principle, that truth is akin to
pity, as pity is akin to love. The great
virtues do not lie far apart.
The criticism is of tenest urged in con-
nection with Hester, who is both the
centre of interest and of the problem.
Hawthorne takes utmost pains to make
i clear how she lived. Whether she was
happy or not he did not undertake to
say; he would not raise so useless a
question. The tragedy is pitched at too
high a key for happiness. Possibly there
may be victory after slow-healing wounds,
but there can be no amelioration by cir-
cumstance or by deadening of sensibil-
ity. Study the thirteenth chapter — An-
other View of Hester — if you would seek
an answer to the question whether in
her case the book gravitates toward de-
spair or points to recovery and life.1
This exquisite rehearsal of Christian
service and temper might well win for
her canonization. It is the picture of a
saint. The very things that Christ made
the condition of acceptance at the last
judgment she fulfilled ; and the graces
that St. Paul declared to be the fruit of
the Spirit were exemplified in her daily
life. Plainly, this is not a picture of
despair, nor even of suffering, except
that which necessarily haunts a true soul
that has done evil. God forbid that it
should be different with any of us !
Forgiveness is not lethean. To forget
1 Note, particularly, pages 194-196 of
Riverside Edition.
The New American Type.
535
our past would defraud the soul of its
heritage in life. The Scarlet Letter
faded out and even acquired another
meaning. Her life came to blessed uses,
with rewards of love and gratitude from
others that reached even unto death. The
logic of this tender picture of a saintly
life — a gospel in itself — must not be
overlooked. Hawthorne certainly did
not mean that the reader should miss the
point. How could recovery from sin be
better told, or be more complete ? When
Peter had denied his Lord and wept bit-
terly over it, all he was told to do was to
feed his Master's sheep. Hester's for-
giveness did not shape itself in the form
of ecstatic visions, but of service in the
spirit of Him who bore witness to the
truth ; and by herself bearing witness to
it she won the reward of its freedom.
To the last touch of his pen Haw-
thorne keeps up the symbolism that both
hides and reveals his meaning, and leaves
us in such a mood as when, on some
autumn day, we watch mountain and
river and sky faintly shrouded in haze
until we wonder if these and life itself
be real, — an experience tenderly ren-
dered by Longfellow in his poem on
Hawthorne. He lived in his dreams,
but his dreams were as real as the earth
and as true as life.
Strangers in Boston still search the
burial ground of King's Chapel for the
grave of Hester Prynne : so true a story,
they think, must be true in fact. If it
had been found they might have asked,
What does the armorial device mean ?
" ON A FIELD, SABLE, THE LETTER A, GULES."
Does the scarlet letter stand for sin or
for cleansing? Is the epitaph a word
of despair or of hope ? In what direc-
tion did Hawthorne intend to lead our
thought ? If asked, he would have said,
Read out of your own heart.
Theodore T. Hunger.
THE NEW AMERICAN TYPE.
WITHIN a few months there has been
an exhibition of portraits in New York
of unusual interest. In the first place,
as the great sign over the entrance
averred, the portraits were " worth mil-
lions ; " in addition to this cynosural qual-
ity, some of them were painted by very
famous painters. A third reason, nei-
ther practical nor artistic, must serve as
the excuse for this little essay. The col-
lection included portraits old and new ;
most of the old were of English men and
women of the end of the eighteenth cen-
tury ; most of the new were present-day
pictures of living Americans, both men
and women. No one who climbed the
stairs of the American Art Galleries, and
wandered through those rambling halls,
intended by the architect for an exhibi-
tion where light was less to be wished
than shade, could keep his thoughts in ar-
tistic leash, and not let them stray from
their proper office of looking on paint-
ings as paintings only ; no one, I mean,
of the noble army of volunteer critics.
It was impossible to look first at the
group of portraits painted a hundred
years ago, and then at the group painted
to-day, and stand undisturbed. Every
spectator enacted again the comic trage-
dy of Rip Van Winkle. An astonishing
change had taken place in men and wo-
men between the time of President Wash-
ington and that of President McKinley ;
bodies, faces, thoughts, had all become
transformed. One short stairway from
the portraits of Reynolds to those of
Sargent ushered in change as if it had
stretched from the first Pharaoh to the
last Ptolemy. Enmeshed in bewilder-
536
The, New American Type.
ment the spectator rubbed his eyes, and
asked the guardian at the desk, if there
were no mistake, if this were really the
exposition " worth millions," and not
rather some biological hoax. Upon re-
flection it was apparent that there had
been no pre-arrangement, no contrived
purpose to confound the spectator ; the
ladies and gentlemen who got up the
exhibition had been bent merely on giv-
ing pleasure to the eye, instruction to the
mind. The show was honest beyond dis-
pute. The first supposition which oc-
curred to everybody was that Reynolds's
Italian-cultivated and old-time craft was
one aspect of excellence, the technical
power and modern craft of Sargent an-
other, and, therefore, that this extraordi-
nary contrast appearing between century
and century was in truth only between
painter and painter. This hypothesis soon
proved untenable. The questions how
and why it was untenable had better be
left to answer themselves, as I recount
the way in which the facts, with their in-
evitable connotations, were presented to
the spectator's mind. Naturally where
facts hang on the wall, arranged not to
illustrate a biological truth, but to econo-
mize the time of the picture hangers, they
are seen in inconsequent succession, and
need some rearrangement in the mind's
eye before they express their real mean-
ing. With some rearrangement, as slight
as may be, I shall briefly discuss the tell-
tale portraits, making, as I go, certain
obvious deductions, which, in the interest
of brevity, I substitute for elaborate pic-
torial analyses. Of course I treat the
pictures not as works of, art, but as bio-
logical witnesses, — not unscathed by
natural shame at the Philistine effront-
ery of the attempt.
A hundred years ago a British type
of body, face, and mind prevailed from
Massachusetts to Virginia ; there were
many individuals and sundry communi-
ties of other bloods, but most of our an-
cestors of Revolutionary times were fea-
tured and complexioned like British men.
Of these men there were in the galleries
several portraits painted by Trumbull.
There was John Adams, a short, ruddy,
choleric little man, with the free bearing
of an English yeoman, ready, perhaps
over-ready, to defend his curtilage and
cowyard, his ploughed fields and fallow,
against tax-gatherers, Cavalier squire, or
even the lord of the manor ; an honest,
healthy man, untroubled by any doubts
as to possible encroachment by his boun-
dary lines. Near him hung Alexan-
der Hamilton, of more aristocratic type,
open, generous, high-spirited, a sort of
dashing gallant, yet of steadfast serenity ;
his mind resting solidly on reason and
principles, an ardent English gentleman.
There was James Madison, not over-
imaginative, not noble, with a touch of
English bulldog in his jowl, shrewd, sta-
ble ; and hard by, sovra gli altri com"
aquila, the sober, godly, righteous face
of Washington, calm, almost severe, a
man of purpose inwardly sustained.
There was also Major-General Samuel
Osgood, of somewhat Southern aspect,
a hawklike keenness in the nose and eyes,
woodsman in youth, soldier in manhood,
a hardy, out - of - doors kind of man.
There were some Gilbert Stuarts, too :
Egbert Benson, a keen, astute person,
eminently a gentleman, dignity blending
with calm ; Chief Justice Jay, a dreamy,
speculative, far-seeing man with curving
lip; and Van Rensselaer, the Patroon,
a sly, foxy gentleman. Both the French
blood and the Dutch, as well as the Eng-
lish, displayed the quiet and equilibrium
which attend an orderly maintenance of
peace in the body and mind of man.
Neither Stuart nor Trumbull was a
great painter, but both were faithful
workmen with the talents allotted to
them in Fortune's hugger-mugger distri-
bution, and strove to paint what they saw.
Whatever these painted faces may be to
the artist, to the common eye they look
like clauses from the Constitution, para-
graphs from the Declaration of Indepen-
dence, maxims from Poor Richard, com-
The New American Type.
537
pendia of definite beliefs and accepted
principles. There is no need further to
describe their looks ; everybody knows
them. They were not limber - minded
men, not readily agnostic, not nicely
skeptical ; they were, neither more nor
less, excepting the sprinkling of foreign
bloods, eighteenth-century Englishmen.
Of course I have nothing to do with histo-
ry neither framed nor hung ; I merely
render a proces-verbal of the testimony
delivered by the portraits in this gallery.
In the main hall, into which the spec-
tator, having paid his toll, entered di-
rectly, most of the English portraits were
hung. There were Sir Joshuas, Gains-
boroughs, Hoppners, Romneys, and oth-
ers, as well as a few Van Dycks, and
two of that " right noble Claudio," sur-
named Coello. The English painters
must take our exclusive attention. Rey-
nolds, of right, comes foremost. In the
corner hung Colonel Cussmaker, a hand-
some, haughty young person of quality,
not without dignity, nez retrousse, mouth
well curved ; he stands carelessly, clad
in red jacket and white breeches, by the
side of his horse, embodying leisure, —
eminently a person of a class apart.
Certainly he has poise of mind and pro-
perly balanced physical constitution. The
Reynolds young women are right-mind-
ed, healthy, simple beings, not indiffer-
ent to their own loveliness, with the nat-
uralness of flowers and somewhat of their
grace ; all of them, matron and maid, of
pleasing mien and soft, curving lines, all
compact of serene dignity and calm. No
man ever made a happier comment on
happy life than Reynolds's soft, sweep-
ing, feminine line from ear to shoulder.
These ladies led lives unvexed ; natural
affections, a few brief saws, a half-dozen
principles, kept their brows smooth, their
cheeks ripe, their lips most wooable.
Even the coquettish little actress, Miss
Kitty Fisher, is as much of a country
girl in mind as any of them. At first
the admirer takes this serene loveliness,
this quiet leisure, this simple pensive
pleasantness, to be the genial nature of
Sir Joshua Reynolds, put by him upon
his canvases. If, however, we take a step
or two, and look at Gainsborough's ladies,
at Romney's, or Hoppner's, we find the
same attributes, in almost wearying repe-
tition, of calm, of simplicity, of dignity,
of leisure ; all lovely ladies led into the
ways of peace and pleasantness by simple
right-mindedness, homely principles, an-
cestral precepts, and natural affections.
Inasmuch as I refer to Reynolds's por-
traits as scientific facts, it may not be out
of place to refer to Ruskin's criticism of
him : — " Considered as a painter of in-
dividuality in the human form and mind,
I think him . . . the prince of portrait
painters. Titian paints nobler pictures,
and Van Dyck had nobler subjects, but
neither of them entered so subtly as Sir
Joshua did into the minor varieties of
human heart and temper."
If this group of portraits brought to-
gether in the American Art Galleries be
deemed too small — haphazard though
it is, and of most interesting pecuniary
value — to serve as the basis of any hy-
pothesis, a brief visit to any well-stocked
gallery will bring confirmatory evidence.
For example, in the Metropolitan Muse-
um in New York, besides several very
charming Sir Joshuas, there are a number
of other English portraits of that epoch.
There is a portrait of Lady Hardwick,
by Francis Cotes, a gentle, graceful, tran-
quil, happy figure of feminine leisure ;
there is Mrs. Reid, as Sultana, by Rob-
ert Edge Pine, — happy the seraglio so
presided over, no envy, no malice, no
faint praise, no hidden sneer ; there is
Gainsborough's Mr. Burroughs, a well-
bred, pleasant, vacant-minded gentleman ;
there is Sir William Beechey's portrait
of a young lady, tranquil as an Eng-
lish landscape. These are all of one
placid family, dwellers, as it were, in
a garden of foxglove and honeysuckle.
Even the fashionable sprightliness of Sir
Thomas Lawrence's sitters, with their
airs and graces, such as the luckless Mrs.
538
The New American Type.
Gibbon floating like a pantomimic Ariel
to an eternit^ chantante, does not conceal
the fundamental qualities of the type.
It is also worth while to notice the por-
traits of Johann Zoffany, R. A., whose
testimony is the more valuable as coming
from a foreigner, and Hoppner's paint-
ing of Mrs. Bache, Franklin's daughter,
steady and dignified, as was necessary,
being so fathered. This last picture and
such portraits as Copley's serve as con-
necting links, if any were needed, be-
tween the eighteenth - century English
type in England and the like type here.
In setting forth these facts there is
the danger, not wholly to be avoided, of
merely cataloguing; I will abridge the
record as far as I can, and yet I must re-
fer, very briefly, to a few French pictures
of the same period. In the American
Galleries was the portrait of a notaire,
M. Laidequine, by de Latour, a placid,
round-cheeked, amiable man, capped or-
namentally after the fashion affected by
baldish men, of a good digestion, — capon
on feast days, turbot on fast, — undis-
turbed by red notarial tape and the rum-
blings of '89 ; a plump, sleek man, of pure
French blood, of plain ideas, of philo-
sophic calm. He is of the bourgeoisie,
but the next portrait is of the blood royal.
M. Nattier's portrait of the dauphin, son
to Louis Quatorze, depicts a round-faced,
rosy-cheeked, pleasant young gentleman
with a little mouth and a petulant ex-
pression, and yet furnished with that
same inward gentleness, which — so it
was objected — might proceed from the
geniality of Reynolds, but in truth pro-
ceeds from a stable physique and a well-
ordered, logical, dogmatic philosophy.
Another portrait, Le Chevalier Eusebe
de Montour, by Vanloo, is a youth of dig-
nified aspect, in spite of his snub nose and
narrow mind. Further on, the Princesse
Lamballe has the air of one who has lived
in a doll's house, most of the time with
her hair-dresser, a weasel-like little lady,
whose head befitted a milliner's block bet-
ter than a guillotine.
All these portraits, American, English,
French, make a most happy and attrac-
tive picture of life in the eighteenth cen-
tury. They chant a chorus of praise for
national character, for class distinctions,
for dogma and belief, for character, for
good manners, for honor, for contempla-
tion, for vision to look upon life as a
whole, for appreciation that the world is
to be enjoyed, for freedom from demo-
cracy, for capacity in lighter mood to
treat existence as a comedy told by Gol-
doni. Such a self-satisfied benedicite ir-
ritated the susceptibility of that nouveau
riche, the nineteenth century, itself not
devoid of self-satisfaction, and drew from
it a great deal of unsympathetic and un-
scientific criticism; in fact, the nineteenth
century was more dependent on its own
spectacles than any century of which we
have record. We must endeavor to steer
between the self-flattery of the one centu-
ry and the jeers of the other, and briefly
consider the traits and qualities revealed
by the portraits.
They portray a pure national breed,
wherein like bred with like in happy
homogeneity, traits paired with consan-
guineous traits, racial habits and national
predispositions mated after their kind ;
the physiological and psychological nice-
ties, which sprang from the differentia-
tion of races and nations, were protected
from the disquiet and distress of cross-
breeding, deep affinities herded together,
and the offspring were saved from the
racking strain and distortion that beset a
hybrid generation. This physical stabil-
ity begot mental calm ; peace of body
insured peace of mind. Likewise, but in
less degree, class spirit, and smallness of
numbers, aided to preserve fixedness and
peace ; especially the peasants, kith of
the cattle, kin of the corn, laid a hardy
animal foundation, preaching silently the
great teaching of Nature that physical
life shall dominate mental life.
The abundant praise of animal life, of
healthy body, of beauty of face, shouted
out by these portraits, does not, however,
The New American Type,
539
exceed their testimony in favor of health
of mind. The calm and quiet of Sir
Joshua's age are scarcely more physical
than moral. It is a period of the Ten
Commandments, of belief, of dogma, of
fixed principles, of ethical laws ; to us
it looks like a little world, such stress
they laid on simple rules, on reverence,
on the gradations of respect, on inherited
morality, on denial of the democratic
ethics that one virtue is as good as an-
other. It had the merits of the village,
— the gentleman of the big house, his
inherited principles burnished by inter-
course with his peers, the parson and the
parson's wife, with old-fashioned Chris-
tianity, the circle round the tavern fire
that concerned itself with what Dr. John-
son had pronounced, the group of critics
in the store that threshed out a rough
garnered morality under the lead of the
schoolmaster, and all the influences which
keep unobstructed the ancient highways
of thought, principle, and conduct ; —
these are the more obvious symbols of
the conservative forces which made the
sitters to Gilbert Stuart, to Gainsborough,
to Vanloo, what they were. No doubt
the prevailing trait in the portraits cited
is leisure, aristocratic leisure ; but leisure
is the substance, aristocratic hue merely
the superficial coloring. If these eigh-
teenth-century painters had painted peas-
ants, their portraits would have mani-
fested leisure, too. It is not leisure in
our mercantile sense of intervals between
paroxysms of money-getting, — moral
mince pies at railway stops, — but mental
leisure, the " content surpassing wealth,
the sage in meditation found," the con-
templation that brings peace, consequent
upon a dogmatic orderliness of ideas and
principles, an acceptance of that condi-
tion of body and mind to which it has
pleased God to call men, the leisure that
can express itself in poetry, in art, in
good manners. Those quiet sitters had
none of the perplexity and inconsequence
which mark a generation that plays its
game with no rules ; their courses of con-
duct were all meted out by principle and
maintained by authority.
My business was, not to analyze, but to
describe, rather merely to sum up those
random faces in general terms ; and to
give a composite account of them, and
it is time to present the evidence con-
cerning our American bodies and souls.
Naturally enough Mr. Sargent's portraits
by their immense dexterity, their truth-
fulness, their extraordinary combination
of crudeness and refinement, of vigor
and art, — he is the Barbarian Conquer-
or, the Tamerlane, of painters, — make
the chief witnesses ; but their evidence is
so fully confirmed by men of markedly
different qualities, that any objection to
Sargent, as a man of peculiar tempera-
ment and genius, would be hypercritical.
He was born to depict a hybrid people,
vagabonds of the mind, to portray the
strain of physiological and psychological
transformation in the evolution of a new
species. His talents dovetail with the
exigencies of our epoch ; hence his great
historical importance.
The obvious qualities in bis portraits
are disquiet, lack of equilibrium, absence
of principle ; a general sense of migrat-
ing tenants, of distrainer and replevin,
of a mind unoccupied by the rightful
heirs, as if the home of principle and
dogma had been transformed into an inn
for wayfarers. Sargent's women are
more marked than his men ; women, as
physically more delicate, are the first to
reveal the strain of physical and psychi-
cal maladjustment. The thin spirit of
life shivers pathetically in its " fleshly
dress ; " in the intensity of its eagerness
it is all unconscious of its spiritual fidget-
ing on finding itself astray, — no path,
no blazings, the old forgotten, the new
not formed. These are signs that accom-
pany the physiological development of
a new species. Sargent's pictures, his
handling of women, poor human docu-
ments, are too well known to justify
further description.
540
The New American Type.
Sargent, however, is not idiosyncratic ;
his testimony is corroborated by the por-
traits of painters differing as widely from
him as is possible. Take the portrait
of a lady, by Mr. Abbott H. Thayer,
a most charming picture of a very at-
tractive subject, but still exhibiting the
drowsy insomnia of the soul, never all
awake, never all asleep. Take a por-
trait by Mr. J. W. Alexander, in which
we see the indefinite, unphysical charm
of American womanhood, the eager pur-
suit of an unseen good, the restless pa-
cing in the body's cage. The physique
of these pictured women is as marked as
the soul within. There is no semblance
of the simple English type, like Sir
Joshua's Mrs. Arnold, the blending of
health and peace, of grace and ease ;
none of twilight walks within a garden's
wall ; the American woman's body, too
slight for a rich animal life, too frail for
deep maternal feelings, seems a kind of
temporary makeshift, as if life were a
hasty and probably futile experiment. In
her, passion fades before self-conscious-
ness, and maternal love, shriveled to a
sentimental duty, hardly suggests the
once fierce animal instinct, the unloosed
vital bond between mother and child.
American mothers are dutiful, but duty
is a very experimental prop in a new spe-
cies, to serve in place of instinct. One
should compare Hoppner's Lady Burling-
ton and Child, or Romney's Mrs. Carwar-
dine and Child (the latter I have only
seen in copies), with a Mother and Child
by Sargent. Romney's mother bends
over her child ; birth has caused no spir-
itual separation ; she and it are one crea-
ture ; her arm holds it, her hand woos it,
her heart spreads its wings over it. In
Sargent's picture the mother waits, as in
an antechamber, for a formal introduc-
tion to the child ; coincidence of surname
in the catalogue alone suggests a previous
acquaintance.
American men, as seen in Sargent,
or in almost any contemporary painter,
exhibit a definite variability in this evo-
lutionary process. They have divested
themselves of the old English traits,
calm, poise, and the like, and show
markedly adaptive characters. What
the future type may be, if it ever become
fixed, cannot be accurately predicted,
but the process of specialization neces-
sarily involves a casting off of certain
old traits and the acquisition of new,
often displaying curious instances of
correlation of parts. Accompanying the
mental process must go a corresponding
physical change, by which certain parts
of the system are expanded, while other
parts stand still, or, perhaps, atrophy, un-
til the old systematic affinity is broken
up and another formed, much after the
fashion of the process which took place
when the unwinged animal put forth
wings, or the paw evolved into the hand.
Vivisection, even upon men of a different
color, being prohibited by public opin-
ion, or by what statesmen deem public
opinion, the inward physiological changes
can only be inferred from the new traits,
outward indices of interior processes.
These male portraits indicate that the
logical, the intellectual, the imaginative,
the romantic faculties, have been dis-
carded and shaken off, doubtless because
they did not tend to procure the success
coveted by the nascent variety ; and, in
their stead, keen, exceedingly simple
powers of vision and action are develop-
ing. This type is found in Sargen
Frank Holl, Bonnat, Chase, Richai
Hall. Perhaps the best example is tl
portrait of Mr. Daniel Lament, by Zoi
Too great stress cannot be laid on thi
impression we make upon quick-sigh
foreigners. This portrait represents
shrewd, prompt, quick, keen, com
man, well, almost brilliantly, equip
for dealing with the immediate present
he has the morale of the tennis player,
concentration, utter absorption, in volley
and take. Of faculties needful to deal
with the remote — imagination, logic, in-
tellect, faith — there is no trace. Craft,
the power that deals with a few facts
The New American Type.
541
close at hand, is depicted in abundance ;
so are promptitude and vigor ; reason,
the power that deals with many facts,
remote, recalcitrant, which require the
mind to hold many pictured combina-
tions at once or in quick succession, is not
there. The portrait indicates the usual
American amiability, domestic kindli-
ness, and aversion to cruel sights and
cruel sounds. The logical faculty which
compels a man to reconcile his theories,
to unite religion and conduct, to com-
bine principle and policy, to fuse the va-
rious parts of his philosophy into one
non-self-contradicting whole, is entirely
omitted. The chief trait in this typical
portrait is ability to react quickly and
effectively to stimuli of the immediate
present, an essential quality in a pros-
pering species ; the chief lack is imagina-
tion. How such equipment will serve
in the future, when the world shall have
passed beyond the colonizing and com-
mercial epochs of history, is of course
wholly beyond the scope of this essay.
There are a number of feminine por-
traits of this type, by Carolus Duran, by
Mr. Benjamin C. Porter (an American
painter), by Mr. Chase, which have the
unimaginative look, the terre -a- terre
spirit, the self-consciousness, of the male
examples, although they commonly lack
keenness and vigor.
The most interesting portrait for our
purposes in the whole millionaire expo-
sition, as a masculine example of that ex-
treme variation which had seemed pecul-
iarly feminine, is a painting entitled W. A.
Clark (lent by Senator W. A. Clark),
by M. Besnard, the famous French
painter, whose method is sufficiently dis-
tinct from that of the other painters to
give peculiar value to any corroborative
evidence offered by him to facts testified
by them. W. A. Clark (of the portrait)
is a slim, slight man, with reddish hair of
a decided color and curl, with beard and
mustache of like appearance, all herisses,
like the fur of a cat in a thunderstorm ;
there is no speculation in the gray-blue,
glassy eyes ; they and the thin, rather
delicate nose are drawn and pinched to-
gether, chest and waist are narrow, fin-
gers but skin on bones. The tightly but-
toned frock coat, never worn before the
sittings, abetted by the brand-new silk hat
and gloves, makes a brave attempt, with
its blue boutonniere, to suggest the air
of a boulevardier. From hair he'risse',
pinched face, crooked arm, and well-
painted sweep of frock coat, emanates
physical and mental distress, such as must
accompany perturbations in Nature, when
she, in desperate endeavor for a new type,
hurls her wild experiments through the
delicate organization of the human body,
distorting all the nice adjustments of
species and genus. No dogmas vex this
nervous spirit, no principles chafe it, no
contemplation dulls it, no discipline con-
fines it ; it ramps wildly in the strait
compass of the present, knowing no past,
unhampered by reverence or respect,
foreseeing no future, unhindered by faith
or upliftedness. It is an extreme ex-
ample, but immensely interesting, for
though it may be merely an erratic vari-
ation, it is near enough other examples
of the type to indicate the characteristic
traits of the new American nationality ;
or it may be an instance of that curious
prophetic power of Nature, by which she
creates an individual a whole generation
ahead of his type. Nevertheless, a more
conservative judgment would surmise
that Zorn's portrait represents the normal
type of the present generation, and Bes-
nard's an exaggerated example of certain
American traits.
Perhaps the most vivid of the impres-
sions carried away from that picture gal-
lery by the inartistic spectator was admi-
ration for the adaptive power of Nature.
In a hundred years, with simple means,
taking a vast expanse of land, metaled
and watered, for her work-table, with a
not too extravagant use of Irish, Ger-
mans, Scots, Jews, French, and Poles for
her tools, she has by delicate adaptive
processes — keeping steady eye on her
542
The Age Limit.
purpose to create a mechanical, soulless
engine — produced from a raw national
type, — the Adamses and Hamiltons of
Washington's era, — the new type dis-
played in Zorn's and Besnard's pictures,
the type of the McKinley era.
H. D. Sedgwick.
THE AGE LIMIT.
MATTHEW CTTRLEY and I lounged
on a pile of lumber on the shady side
of Muddy Brook breaker, while he in-
structed me in the facts of the coal-
miners' strike. Although not without
bias, his accounts of men and manners
showed him laudably fair-minded, and
his anecdotes had a charming way of
coming to the point in a few words.
Moreover, it is not every day that one
can get the stories of the breaker, the
engine room, and the shaft confidentially
and at first hand.
" There's old Sandy Anderson, now,"
said he. " Maybe you '11 know him ?
Well, he was a pious old fellow, that
was fire-boss in this mine for goin' on
forty years, till six months ago now.
Didn't talk much; quiet an' sourlike;
great one he was about his church, too,
an' Y. M. C. A., an' timp'rance meetin's,
an' those things. He 'd give it to 'em
hot if a fellow happened to swear when
he was a-walkin' down the gangway an'
heard it ; even the Hungarians an' Po-
landers, that didn't know no English
but swearin', he 'd preach away at them,
too. He got the name o' Deacon with
the men long 'fore any of us was born.
He knew his business, though, an' we
liked him good enough. Sincet the new
comp'ny bought the mine, though, he got
treated dirty mean, an' fin'lly they give
him the bounce with one week's notice.
Not for nothin' wrong, nor 'xsplosions,
nor caves, nor scraps with the men, but
just 'cause he 'd got to be sixty four
years old. An' him knowin' the mine
these forty year, every air-way an' door
an' slope, as well as I know my shoes.
Yes, sir, it 's a pretty old mine. Forty
years is pretty old for a mine, that 's
right ; but ye see, 't was opened first by
a slope by the hill yonder, an' then a
shaft this side the bend o' the creek, an'
then this openin'. But 't is all one mine,
an' he 'd been in it right along. An' him
bein' a poor man, with a kind of spite-
ful old woman to home, made it worse.
When he quit work, he had n't nowhere
to spend his time. He seemed to quit
goin' to meetin's 'bout that time, an'
there just was n't nothin' to keep him
busy.
" Him an' the engineer was the great-
est friends ; butties once when they was
young, an' always thought a lot of each
other. Day after he quit, old Sandy
did n't show his head out o' doors ; but
the next day I s'pose things got hot at
home. Anyhow, down he comes, partly
sneakin' along, an' sits in the engine
room all that day an' the next, too. The
fireman told me afterwards the old
Deacon just sat there an' mostly did n't
open his mouth for a word, an' now an'
then he 'd be sittin' up there cryin' kind
of slow and stupid-like, an' not seemin'
rightly to know it at all.
"One time he heard him say to Jim
that old men was no use in the world
after the first o' May. ' Why, Jim,'
says he, talkin' awful Scotchy, ' I 'm
verra strong man yet. Sure, I 'm bet-
ter at my wor-r-r-k than the young chap
they have given it to, who is a fearful
venturesome young man, and a profane
swearer besides, to my own knowledge.
Hark ye, Jim,' says he, ' I have served
them faithful now for forty year, good
The Age Limit.
543
times and calamities an' all, an' now
they put me to shame ! ' Then he sighed
something awful.
" Pretty soon the bell rang from down
the shaft for Jim to hoist away, an'
when the engines started it seemed to
make him feel worse again, an' the tears
run down his beard somethin' pitiful.
Soon 's he stopped the engines, Jim
went over to him and tried to cheer him
up, but he did n't really pay no attention.
" ' Mrs. Anderson takes it verra hard,'
says he, scared-like. ' She 's verra wor-
ried an' verra much put about in the
matter. She says that the man who pro-
videth not for those of his own household
is worse than a thief. We must go to
the poorhouse in our old age,' says he.
' Business is that dull I cannot get me
another place,' says he."
Here Curley paused to recline at ease
along the boards. I scarcely dared stir,
for fear of disconnecting the links of the
story. Pen cannot do justice, unfortu-
nately, to the composite dialect which dis-
tinguished the quotations.
" But presently, all along o' a little
matter o' dockage, the men struck, an'
the pump-runners an' firemen struck with
them to be in the fashion. So the fans
was stopped an' the pumps was stopped,
an' gas an' water gathered in the work-
in's unbeknownst, because there was n't
no men down that week to take notice
of it. 'T was a dry weather spell, an' had
been for a long time, an' the mines were
pretty dry, so the comp'ny's Super'ntin-
dent said he could wait for 'em two
weeks to start the pumps, an' the mines
not take no harm from it.
" Well, there come along a rain, an' a
cloudburst, an' a flood, an' a runaway
creek got down the shaft overnight, an'
things was in an awful way. The water
was anywhere an' everywhere. The new
boss, he went down with a gang o' six
men an' did n't dare to go away from the
foot of the shaft, 'cause they heard the
pillars goin' whit-wheet, chippin' some-
thing awful, an' the chunks o' top-rock
splashin' down into the water, way off
down the gangway. There wasn't no
use runnin' round the mine, when she
was actin' up that way, just on an excur-
sion-like. When she 's working as we
says, excursions is no use, an' ye want
to send down props by the hunderds, an'
do yer explorin' afterwards. So the new
boss, he comes up an' he sends down all
the props there was on hand, an' he
telyphones the office for five hunderd
more, — which was n't specially conven-
ient, them bein' stood up in piles of
fifties in the comp'ny's lumber yard ten
miles away, 'cause the Super'ntindent
was such a partic'lar man 'bout ' system
an' nateness.' The worse luck was, the
Old Man himself was on hand in th'
office, an' he telyphones back that the
props 'ud come down on a special train
soon 's they could be loaded, an' himself
'ud come down on a special engine ahead
o' the props, to help 'em. Till he got
there, they was to presarve the comp'ny's •
property, so he said. But the property
was that water-soaked by that time, the
rocks was just saggin' in, an' the pillars
was chippin' to nothin' with bearin' up
all that extra heft o' water. An' as for
gas, the fans had been stopped eleven
days an' nights, so there was a plenty ;
an' nobody could n't tell where it had
gathered, 'cause there was all the water
shovin' it round out o' its proper places.
" Afore he mounted up on his special
engine, though, the Old Man had a spell
o' workin' the telyphone lively with or-
ders. He always was a great hand to
get giving orders, anyhow. 'Bout the
time he got there, he had engineers, an*
pumpmen, an' fire-bosses, an' carpenters,
an' inside bosses, an' miners, an' tools, an'
lumber, an' powder, an' oil, an' Davy
lamps, by the dozens an' carloads from
all the comp'ny's other mines near by,
an' even some men an' lamps borrowed
from other comp'nies' works along the
creek.
" The firemen an' engineers an' pump-
runners was set to work firin' up an'
544
The Age Limit.
settin' the fans goin' all they could stand,
to get up some o' the gas outen the work-
in's. The Old Man ran around shoutin'
out orders, an' prisently he had engineers
at the fires, an' firemen outside nailin' up
lumber for brattices, an' fire-bosses run-
nin' errands, an' sweatin' over the tely-
phone, an' carpenters fillin' an' cleanin'
the safety-lamps, an' every Jack of us
doin' some other man's work. The Old
Man always loves to see things hum that
way, an' the strikers just stood round an'
laughed at the show. It was pourin' rain,
too, an' had been for three days an'
nights.
" In about two or three hours, the
young feller, the fire-boss old Sandy said
was so venturesome, had got all his props
used, an' the new ones had n't come yet.
Some o' the men, Dagos, come out after
that, and would n't go back in again, be-
cause she was a-workin' something awful,
an' the chips o' coal shootin'-off the pil-
lars every minute, an' the roof crackin',
an' water drippin' where water never
dripped when the mine was right, an'
two rows of props round the pillars did
n't seem to do no good, and they was
scared. But the boss kept right on.
When the props was gone, he left the
men up by the shaft an' went lookin'
round the mine a bit by himself. He
always was one o' those you could n't
kill. Nobody else was anxious to go.
" Pretty soon he comes back to them,
an' says he, 'Anybody here that knows
the air-ways of the old Rat-hole Slope ?
'Cause our air-way on Five Gangway is
got a fall o' clay an' top-rock to spoil its
beauty,' says he, ' so, unless we can open
into Rat-hole an' back again into ours
under the fan, we can't get air into this
gangway at all, nor get rid of the gas.'
" But there was n't a man there with
him old enough to look back to the last
days o' Rat-hole Slope. So up comes the
boss an' the men, an' the boss begins to
hunt for a man what knew the Rat-hole
air-ways.
" Well, they told him old Sandy An-
derson was the only man, an' just then
the Super'ntindent came buzzin' by an'
heard it. ' Then get him ! ' he snaps.
' Send for him ! '
" ' He 's over in the engine room,' said
somebody.
" ' He won't go,' says the new fire-boss,
' not for nobody, nor if the whole mine
fell in. You don't know old Sandy An-
derson.'
" ' He will too ! ' yelled the Super'n-
tindent, beginnin' to scold an' swear, an'
makin'a bee-line acrost the yard towards
the engine house. Everybody that heard
what was up began to run for the engine
house, too. Time I got there, there was
old Sandy standin' in the doorway, glarin'
down at the Super'ntindent an' talkin'
solemn-like.
" ' Ye discharged me the first o' May,'
says he. ' Now ye may attend person-
ally to yer own mines.' An' with that
he turns his back to go in, an' all the
crowd sets up a cheerin'.
" Then the Super'ntindent began to
swear somethin' surpassing standin'
there an' shootin' off his words through
the door. After a minute, Sandy comes
to the window an' looks out at him.
" ' Man ! ' says he, ' stop yer blas-
phemin' ! Ye 're on in life now, and ye 've
enough to reckon for if ye should be
called this night to yer account. Besides,
it riles my temper.'
" ' Will ye go down in the mine an'
help open up the old air-way, then, ye
stubborn old fool ? ' yelled the Old Ma
letting off another string.
" ' Ye discharged me the first o'
month. And I do not like to be swoi
at. I can have ye arrested,' says he.
" ' Discharged you, did I ? High time
too, I guess ! ' yells the Old Man. ' An'
now I need ye, an' I '11 hire ye again.
Get back to your work, an' quit shirkin' ! '
" ' I don't know if I just want the job,'
says old Sandy ; an' the crowd cheere
him again.
" Then the Super'ntindent saw 't ws
no use, an' he changed his tone. ' Look
The Age Limit.
545
here, Anderson, you 're the only man
that 's here now that knows the old Rat-
hole air-ways. We 've got to open that
air-way, and you 're the only one can man-
age it. Name yer own terms,' says he.
" Old Sandy just grunted an' looked
out the window, an' did n't seem to hear
the jawin' that was bein' done on his ac-
count. ' It ain't a very nice job,' says
he, squintin' his eye. ' But yet, a man
cannot be too partic'lar if he 's out of a
job.'
" He waited awhile, an' then says he,
' If you '11 promise afore these here wit-
nesses to pay me fifteen dollars a month
the rest o' my lifetime if I don't get
killed, or thirty dollars a month to Mrs.
Anderson for her lifetime if I do, I '11 go
down.'
" Gee ! I thought the Super'ntindent
would bust or blow up afore he could let
out his feelings on the Deacon ! An' yet
it was n't such an awful nervy offer as it
looked, seein' how Sandy had worked for
them forty year.
" ' Then attend to it yerself,' said old
Sandy, an' went an' sat down in the cor-
ner by the fly-wheel.
" Well, the men went down an' the
props went down, an' they did the best
they could, an' did n't accomplish nothin'.
Pretty soon, in about two hours, there
come a jolt, an' the fans was blown clean
out o' the air-shaft. 'T was the gas ex-
ploded. The engineer sent down the
cage double-quick, in case anybody should
be down there to get on. After a couple
o' minutes the bell rang to hoist away.
There was another jolt afore he got them
to the top, an' this time 't was the mine
cavin' after th' explosion had shook it.
There 's likely to be some cavin' after a
'splosion, specially if the mine had been
workin' some beforehand.
" There was three men on, two o' them
burned something awful to look at. The
other was an Italian ; he was shakin' an'
silly, though he was n't hurt much. His
English was clean jarred out o' him, an'
he could n't tell nothin'.
VOL. xciii. — NO. 558. 35
" We took the two fellows to the en-
gine room, against the ambulance should
come. — Funny how a man that 's burnt
bad gen'lly feels the cold, ain't it? —
They was just awful lookin'. Old man
Shea, he walked in of himself, an' fell
down, and says he, ' Boys, you want to
get the rest of 'em damn quick. Drownd-
in' an' gas an' cavin' an' top-rock,' says
he, an' went oft' in a dead faint. His
eyes was about all of him that was n't
burnt, being how he could n't lie down
flat in the gangway for the water that
was knee-deep, an' so he just covered 'em
with his hands an' let the rest of himself
go to cinders.
" The other fellow was n't hurt all
over, but he was blinded, an' we had to
carry him across to the engine room. He
hollered an' cried when we touched him,
an' begged us for God's sake throw him
back down the shaft to be out o' his pain.
The skin o' his one arm come off in my
hand when I touched him. It 's an aw-
ful thing to see a man burnt like that."
Curley stared off at a gleam of blue river,
and seemed to lose interest in his own
story.
" Were the rest all dead ? " I asked,
after an interval.
" No. Not but we thought they were,
though, then. We got him in 'longside
o' old man Shea, an' give him some whis-
key, and asked him did he know if any
other o' the boys was alive down there,
and where was they. Jim stood there,
listenin', listenin', to hoist away the min-
ute he got the signal, so 's there was
anybody down there to give it.
" Old Sandy Anderson was there, too,
a-shakin' all over, an' kind of chokin'
when he 'd try to speak out, an' sayin'
over to himself : ' The young fool ! The
venturesome, foolish young man ! Thret-
ty men's lives, because of a fool and hia
folly ! Thretty lives ! Myself, I 'd not
'a' had them inside this day.'
" But when the fellow that was hurted
began tellin' as how the boss an* nine
men was just leavin' the shaft after th'
546
The Age Limit.
explosion, an' ought to be near the foot
somewheres, he quit talkin' an' listened.
In a minute he had his white shirt an'
collar off, an' was strippin' to the waist.
' Gimme your shirt, Jim ! ' says he, ' an'
somebody gimme another. Two 's none
too many when we don't know where the
gas is.'
" ' Delany,' says he to a man standin'
in the doorway, ' get me eight men to go
down an' get the boss, the young fool ! '
says he. ' And be parteecular to wear
two shirts,' says he.
" So there was a great strippin' all
round out in the yard, 'count of lots of
us bein' on strike an' dressed up good,
an' not a stitch of a woolen shirt on lots
of us. Them as had on a thick wool
Bhirt was tryin' to get another, an' other
men tryin' to pull that offen them in-
stead. And not a man would Delany
hear to that wore a bit of cotton on him,
nor a thin shirt, because a thick wool
shirt has saved many a man's life from
fire, an' he knew it. Myself, I had to
wear old Sandy's shirt through the streets
that night till I could get home ; an' took
it over to Mis' Anderson after dark.
" When Delany had got his eight men,
he come to the door an' told Sandy.
" ' Who Ve ye got ? ' says Sandy ; and
Delany, he told him. They was all men
that knew Sandy, and that 'ud worked in
the mines twenty years an' over.
" ' Man ! ' says Sandy. ' Don't ye know
they 're all out on strike ? '
" ' Strike be damned ! ' says Delany.
1 That don't cut no ice now. It 's the
men we 're after. My own cousin 's
down there now.'
" ' So 's my son,' says a man with a red
shirt on over a black one ; and I seen it
was the young boss's father, that had n't
spoke to the young fellow for a month on
account of his not strikin' with the rest.
Old Sandy finished talkin' with Jim just
as some o' the boys come runnin' up with
the tools an' four safeties. He was just
turnin' around when into the door came
the old Super'ntindent, half crazy.
" ' Sandy Anderson ! ' says he, with no
swearin' at all, ' I want volunteers to go
down with me. My men are down there.
I sent 'em, but you must help me get 'em
out!'
" Sandy, he hardly looked at the Old
Man ; he just went on towards the door.
" Then the Super'ntindent he talked
faster an' worse 'n I ever heard him be-
fore, an' he ends up a-sayin', —
" ' I '11 take your blame, mud-suckin',
money-lickin' offer, you cold-blooded old
penny-pinchin' mongrel ! ' — an' other
decorations. — ' Ye shall grow fat doin'
nothin', an' cut your false teeth on your
pension money the rest of your life, you
slow old skunk ! ' He was goin' on to
say more when Sandy stopped him.
" ' Verra weel,' says he, lookin' round.
' It 's a contract between us, an' these per-
sons are my weetnesses. Jim, I name
you my executor, to see to it for Mrs.
Anderson if I do not come out.'
" The Old Man began again, but he
did n't say two words.
" ' Hold that jaw ! ' says Sandy. ' I '11
maybe be face to face wi' my Maker in
half an hour, an' I will not go to Him wi'
my ears full o' your profane oaths. An'
as for the love o' money, — good God,
man, I 'm goin' for the lives o' thretty
men ! I was goin', anyhow. — Get out
o' my road ! ' Then he just shoved the
Old Man one side an' ran out, sayin' over
his shoulder, ' The Lord forgive ye, ye
have made me begin to swear myself ! '
" The Super'ntindent ran out too, but
bein' fat an' old he did n't get to the shaft
till the cage with Sandy an' the men was
started down. But we heard Sandy call
up, ' There was competent weetnesses ' —
" ' The damned Scotchman ! ' says the
Old Man, an' went back an' began tely-
phoning for all the ambulances from the
other mines, besides the hospital."
" Did they need them all ? " I asked.
" They did," said Curley. " Thouj
when Sandy's gang went down we reallj
did n't think anybody 'd come up agair
nor even need the undertaker. There wa
The Age Limit.
547
another cave that night ; but before that,
Sandy had sent up twelve men alive an'
four bodies, an' Delany an' the eight men
got up just in time.
" Sandy did n't come, nor the young
boss, neither. The last cavin' jammed
the cage in the shaft, some way, part
way down, as Jim was lowerin' it, so
there was n't nothin' more we could do
for him.
" Jim was feelin* awful bad, an' he
would n't even leave the engine house
though the night-shift man had come on ;
but he hung round an' waited, though he
did n't know what for. An' sure enough,
'bout eleven o'clock, in came old Sandy,
dirty and tired, but not hurted.
" ' Jim,' says he, just as plain an' nat-
ural as anything, ' I 've not had time
to get any supper yet. It 's late now,
an' Mrs. Anderson is very prompt to put
away the supper at seven o'clock. Have
you or Harry a bit o' some thin' in your
pails that I could stay my stomach on
before I go away home ? I 'm a verra
strong man yet, but I 'm sixty-four years
old, an' I 'm free to say I am just faint
wi' hunger.'
" So they got the watchman's pail, an'
the fireman's, and they come in too, and
while he ate up all their three pails he
told 'em how he 'd found the young fire-
boss wedged behind a timber, an' got
him out, an' both come out by some o'
the old workin's beyond Rat-hole. He
had n't lost no appetite, neither, nor got
so much as a scratch on him."
Curley stood up, stretched, and
climbed down from the pile of timbers,
as much as to say that he had finished
the story. I followed with a question.
" What became of the old man ? Two
people cannot live on fifteen dollars a
month."
He eyed me with a peculiar smile.
" It 's been done, afore now, to my
knowledge," said he. " But he did n't
have to. Jim, he rung up the tely phone
exchange an' told them, while Sandy
was eatin' the fireman's cold pie ; an'
then he rung up the comp'ny's office an'
told them ; an' the telyphone girls, they
must 've told a thousand people an hour,
'cause the whole town was crazy to get
news. Anyhow, the next day, the Su-
per'ntindent comes round, an' 'bout noon
he posts a notice at the breaker that
Sandy Anderson is made ' consultin' fire-
boss,' with his old salary back again."
" What is a consulting fire-boss ? " I
asked.
" There ain't no such thing, but they
called him that because he was over the
age limit. He don't have nothing to do
unless they send for him to come to one
of the collieries ; there 's weeks when he
don't do a thing; then there 's weeks
when he works as hard as ever."
" So he did n't get his pension," I re-
marked, as we strolled past the chutes
of the breaker.
" You bet he did ! " responded my in-
formant with vigor. " First pay - day,
he got just his sixty dollars, and he told
them he 'd sue for the fifteen if they
did n't give it to him peaceable. Why,
the Union even made him an honorary
member, I b'lieve, the ways they could
push the thing through if he needed
them. But he gets it, all right. They
know a corporation has no show before
a jury, now'days ; and then Sandy has
his witnesses. Oh, he 's fixed fine, I tell
you!"
E. S- Johnson.
548
An Odd Sort of Popular Book.
AN ODD SORT OF POPULAR BOOK.
MULTIPLICITY of editions does uot
make a book a classic. Otherwise Wor-
cester's Dictionary and Mrs. Lincoln's
Cook - Book might almost rival Shake-
speare. Nevertheless, when a work
which has little but its literary quality to
recommend it achieves sudden and per-
manent popularity, it is safe to assume
that there is something about it which will
repay curious consideration. As to the
popularity of The Anatomy of Melancho-
ly there can be no dispute. " Scarce any
book of philology in our land hath, in
so short a time, passed through so many
editions," says old Fuller ; though why
" philology " ? The first of these edi-
tions appeared in 1621. It was followed
by four others during the few years pre-
ceding the author's death in 1640. Three
more editions were published at different
times in the seventeenth century. The
eighteenth century was apparently con-
tented to read Burton in the folios ; but
the book was reprinted in the year 1800,
and since then it has been issued in vari-
ous forms at least as many as forty times,
though never as yet with what might be
called thorough editing.
Quantity of approval is in this case well
supported by quality. Milton showed
his admiration, as usual, by imitation.
Sterne conveyed passage after passage
almost bodily into Tristram Shandy.
Southey's odd book, The Doctor, follows
Burton closely in manner and often in
matter. Dr. Johnson said that The
Anatomy of Melancholy was the only
book that ever took him out of bed two
hours sooner than he wished to rise ; large
commendation surely, and I have never
found any other, even of the most de-
vout Burtonians, quite ready to echo it.
Lamb was a reader, adorer, and imitator ;
Keats, the first two, at any rate. Finally,
Mr. Saintsbury assures us that " for
reading either continuous or desultory,
either grave or gay, at all times of life
and in all moods of temper, there are
few authors who stand the test of practice
so well as the author of The Anatomy
of Melancholy." For all that, I would
not advise the general reader to buy a
copy in too great haste. He will, per-
haps, find it easier to read about the book
than to read it.
What we know of the life of Robert
Burton is a very small matter, as is the
case with so many of his greater con-
temporaries. He was born at Lindley
in Leicestershire in 1577, thirteen years
after Shakespeare, four years after Ben
Jonson. He was at school at Sutton-
Coldfield in Warwickshire and at Nun-
eaton till he was seventeen. He the:
went to Brasenose College. In 1599 h
was elected student of Christ Church.
In 1614 he received the degree of B. D.,
and in 1616 he became vicar of St.
Thomas in the west suburb of Oxford.
About 1630 he added to this cure the
rectory of Segrave in Leicestershire.
Besides the Anatomy he wrote a Latin
comedy, Philosophaster, unusually clev-
er and brilliant in its kind. He died in
1640, and was buried in the choir o:
Christ Church Cathedral. The little bi
of gossip narrated by Wood is amusingly
illustrative of the mythical character so
apt to attach itself to the solitary scholar.
It seems that Burton's death occurred at
or very near the time which had been
foretold by himself from the calculation
of his own nativity ; in consequence of
which " several of the students did not
forbear to whisper among themselves
that, rather than there should be a mis-
take in the calculation, he sent up his soul
to heaven through a slip»about his neck."
With the exception of a few other bits
of doubtful gossip and of the full text
of his will, this is all of importance that
has come down to us about the author of
An Odd Sort of Popular Book.
549
the Anatomy. It is rather brief, cer-
tainly, when one realizes that, if he had
lived two hundred and fifty years later,
he would probably have been honored
with two solid volumes of so-called bio-
graphy, like many another much less
worthy of it.
Far more than most great writers,
however, Burton left the reflection of his
life and character in his work, and The
Anatomy of Melancholy may be called
one of the> most intensely personal books
that were ever written. To be sure, the
author does not constantly and directly
refer to himself and his own affairs.
Nevertheless, the impress of his spirit is
felt on every page.
Several of the biographical facts above
mentioned are derived from casual re-
marks dropped here and there through-
out the book. Of his mother, Mistress
Dorothy Burton, he says that she had
" excellent skill in chirurgery, sore eyes,
aches, etc.," and that she had " done many
famous and good cures upon divers poor
folks that were otherwise destitute of
help." He gives us a reminiscence of
his boyhood : " They think no slavery in
the world (as once I did myself) like to
that of a grammar scholar." He speaks
with a grain of bitterness of a younger
brother's lot : " I do much respect and
honor true gentry and nobility ; I was
born of worshipful parents myself, in
an ancient family ; but I am a younger
brother, it concerns me not."
He gives U3 many glimpses of his
lonely scholar's life. In his youth he
was ambitious : " I was once so mad to
bussell abroad and seek about for pre-
ferment, tyre myself, and trouble all my
friends." But the world is cold, friend-
ship formal and touches not the heart :
" I have had some such noble friends,
acquaintance, and scholars, but most pr.rt
they and I parted as we met ; they gave
me as much as I requested and that
was — ." His habits are those of the
recluse and ascetic : " I am a bachelor
myself and lead a monastic life in a col-
lege." "I am aquce potor, drink no
wine at all." Yet he loves the sweet of
nature too, if the bitter thirst of know-
ledge would permit : " No man ever
took more delight in springs, woods,
groves, gardens, walks, fishponds, rivers,
etc." Force of circumstance, lack of
opportunity, younger brotherhood, timid-
ity, have kept him secluded within the
wrJIs of great libraries, have piled huge
dusty tomes on the human beating of his
heart. " I have lived a silent, sedentary,
solitary, private life in the University,
as long almost as Xenocrates in Athens,
to learn wisdom as he did, penned up
most part in my study." Yet if the
Fates had willed otherwise, the man
would have been consenting. Let us
note right here that this is the whole
charm of Burton and his great book. It
is no dry treatise of a gray-haired pedant,
thumbing contentedly forever dull vol-
umes of mouldy tradition. For all its
quaint garb and thorny aspect, it is a
great human document, the work of a
man whose bodily life was passed in his
study, but whose senses were all keenly,
pantingly alert to catch the motion of
the wide world beyond. Beauty — he
adores beauty. " This amazing, con-
founding, admirable beauty ; 't is na-
ture's crown, gold, and glory." Love —
Oh, how he could have loved ! " I con-
fess I am but a novice, a contemplator
only," he writes of it ; " yet homo sum,
I am a man, and not altogether inex-
pert in this subject." Like Flaubert, he
doubtless leaned forth from his study
window on many a moonlit night, and
heard a company of revelers with merry
song and pleasant jest, and caught the
dim flutter of a white gown, and found
all his books and learning mere dust be-
side the laughter and the passion of the
world.
And so he grew melancholy, as often
happens in such cases. When a man gets
these fits on him, he may either rush out
into active life for the sake of contrast,
he may marry, or go into politics, or do
550
An Odd Sort of Popular Book.
something even more rash and criminal ;
or he may cut his throat ; or he may write
a book. On the whole, the last method
is the most to be recommended. Burton
adopted it ; and, with homoeopathic in-
genuity, he wrote a book on melancholy
itself. " I write against melancholy, by
being busy, to avoid melancholy. . . .
Shall I say, my mistress melancholy, my
Egeria, or my evil genius ? "
The loose and literary sense in which
Burton uses the word melancholy is char-
acteristic of the tone of his book. With-
out really attempting any precise defini-
tion, or, rather, having confused the
reader with a multitude of definitions
taken from all the authors under the sun,
he proceeds to include every form of ner-
vous depression, from a mere temporary
fit of the blues to acute or chronic mania
and insanity. At the same time, being a
man of a logical and systematic turn of
mind, he imposes on others, and perhaps
on himself, with a great show of formal
and scientific treatment. The work is
mapped out into divisions, partitions, sec-
tions, members, subsections, arranged in
as awful order of deduction as Euclid or
the Ethics of Spinoza. But let no one be
alarmed. This is pure matter of form.
The author speaks of what he likes, when
he likes. Occasionally he takes the pains
to recognize that he is digressing, as in
the delicious chapters entitled A Digres-
sion of Spirits, A Digression of Air.
And then, with a sigh, he tries to call
himself back to the work in hand .
"But my melancholy spaniels quest, my
game is sprung, and I must suddenly
come down and follow." The game leads
him into strange places, however. The
vast and checkered meadow of the hu-
man heart is his hunting-ground. Mel-
ancholy is the skeleton in the closet, al-
ways popping out at odd times and in
unexpected corners ; but he keeps it
wreathed with bright flowers, and made
sweet with strange and subtle savors, and
brilliant and sparkling with jewels of
quaint wit and wandering fancy. Never-
theless, when he does discuss his subject
itself, he has bits of sound common sense,
useful to-day and always, like his re-
commendation of " the three Salernitan
Doctors, D. Merryman, D. Diet, and
D. Quiet, which cure all diseases."
Some one may object that this saying
is quoted and not Burton's own invention.
Certainly, Burton is the greatest quoter
in literature, far surpassing even Mon-
taigne. His mind was full of the thoughts
of others, and he poured them forth to-
gether with his own in inextricable mix-
ture. He was a man drenched, drowned
in learning, not learning of the quick,
smart, practical, modern type, which en-
ables its possessor to give interviews on
the inhabitants of Mars and testify on
poisons at a murder trial, but mediaeval
learning, drowsy, strange, unprofitable,
and altogether lovely. In the discussion
of these melancholy matters all preced-
ing literature is laid under contribution,
not only the classics, but countless writ-
ers of the Middle Ages, doubtless re-
spectable in their own day and possibly
in Burton's, but now so dead that the
reader stares and gasps at them and
wonders whether his author is not in-
venting references, like the Oracle in
the Innocents Abroad. Melanelius, Ruf-
fus, Aetius describe melancholy "to be
a bad and pievish disease." Hercules
de Saxonia approves this opinion, as
do Fuchsius, Arnoldus, Guianerius, and
others — not unnaturally. Paulus takes
a different view, and Halyabbas still an-
other. Aretseus calls it " a perpetual an-
guish of the soul, fastened on one thing,
without an ague." In this brilliant but
hazy statement the absence of ague is at
least a comfort. It is disquieting, in-
deed, to find that " this definition of his
Merrialis taxeth ; " but we are reassured
by the solid support of ^lianus Montal-
tus. And so on.
Pure pedantry, you will say. Well,
yes. It would be, if Burton were not
saved from the extreme of pedantry by
a touch of humor, which makes you
An Odd Sort of Popular Book.
551
somehow feel that he does not take all
this quite seriously himself. Yet it is
very hard for him to look at anything
except through the eyes of some remote
authority. We have heard him speak
of his mother's excellent cures. It seems
that one of her favorite remedies was " an
amulet of a spider in a nutshell lapped
in silk," super-sovereign for the ague.
Burton finds it hard to swallow this ; it
was " most absurd and ridiculous ; for
what has a spider to do with a fever ? "
Ah, but one day " rambling amongst
authors (as often I do) I found this very
medicine in Dioscorides, approved by
Matthiolus, repeated by Aldrovandus.
... I began to have a better opinion
of it, and to give more credit to amu-
lets." I can see from here Mistress
Dorothy Burton's lovely scorn at being
confirmed by Dioscorides. What did
she care for Dioscorides ? Did she not
have the recipe from her great-aunt, and
has she not proved it a dozen times her-
self?
This trick of constant quoting has led
some shallow people to set Burton down
as a mere quoter and nothing else. There
could be no greater mistake. It is the
activity and independence of his own
mind which make him so eager to watch
and compare the minds of others ; and
while he profited by their thinking, he
was abundantly able to do his own, as
every page of his book shows. One need
ask no better specimen, of strong, shrewd,
satirical reflection than the sketch of a
Utopian commonwealth in the introduc-
tion which purports to be by Democritus
Junior ; and of many other passages we
may say the same.
Nor was our author lacking in deep,
human sympathy, although his solitary
life and keen intellect disposed him to
be a trifle cynical. The celebrated bit
with the refrain " Ride on ! " — so bril-
liantly imitated by Sterne — shows a pit-
iful appreciation of sorrow and misery,
which, indeed, are abundantly recognized
everywhere in the Anatomy.
But perhaps the most characteristic
illustration of Burton's intense appetite
for humanity is his frequent reference
to common daily life and manners.
M. Anatole France tells us that the author
of The Imitation must certainly have
been a man of the world before he betook
himself to his lonely cell and pious med-
itation. If Bui'ton never was a man of
the world, he would certainly have liked
to be one. He peers out from behind
the bars of his cell and catches every
possible glimpse of the curious things
which are shut away from him. Shreds
of fashion, hints of frivolity, quips of
courtiers, the flash of swords and glitter-
ing of jewels, — he will find a place for
them. Woman fascinates him especially,
— that singular creature who apparently
cares nothing for books and study, laughs,
weeps, scolds, caresses, without any rea-
sonable cause whatever. Certainly no
philosopher should take any notice of
her, — yet they all do. And he exhausts
himself in cunning heaps of observation,
vain interrogations of mysterious bou-
doirs : " Why do they make such glorious
shows with their scarfs, feathers, fans,
masks, furs, laces, tiffanies, ruffs, falls,
calls, cuffs, damasks, velvets, tinsel, cloth
of gold, silver, tissue ? With colors of
heavens, stars, planets ; the strength of
metals, stones, odors,flowers,birds, beasts,
fishes, and whatsoever Africk, Asia,
America, sea, land, art and industry of
man can afford ? why do they use such
novelty of inventions ; such new-fangled
tires; and spend such inestimable sums
on them ? . . . Why is it but, as a day-
net catcheth larks, to make young men
stoop unto them ? " And old philoso-
phers also, he might have added.
I have taken this passage from the
section on Love Melancholy ; for Bur-
ton devotes a large portion of his work
to that delightful subject. He feels it
necessary to make some apology for en-
tering upon it. Some persons will think
it hardly becoming in so grave, reverend,
and dignified a gentleman, — a clergy-
552
An Odd Sort of Popular Book.
man too. But he has good authors on
his side : " I excuse myself with Peter
Godefridus, Valleriola, Ficinus, Langius,
Cadmus Milesius, who writ fourteen
books of love." Surely, he would be
very critical who should ask more than
this.
The apology once made, with what
gusto he sets forth, how he luxuriates
in golden tidbits from love's delicate
revels ! " A little soft hand, pretty little
mouth, small, fine, long fingers, 't is that
which Apollo did admire in Daphne."
" Of all eyes (by the way) black are
most amiable, enticing, and fair." " Oh,
that pretty tone, her divine and lovely
looks, her everything lovely, sweet, ami-
able, and pretty, pretty, pretty." Is it
not the mere ecstasy of amorous frenzy ?
Again, he gives us a very banquet, a rosy
wreath of old, simple English names, a
perfect old-fashioned garden : " Modest
Matilda, pretty, pleasing Peg, sweet, sing-
ing Susan, mincing, merry Moll, dainty,
dancing Doll, neat Nancy, jolly Jone,
nimble Nell, kissing Kate, bouncing Bess
with black eyes, fair Phillis, with fine
white hands, fiddling Frank, tall Tib,
slender Sib, etc." Do you not hear their
merry laughter, as he heard it in his dim
study, a dream of fair faces and bright
forms twisting, and turning, and flash-
ing back and forth under the harvest
moon?
Yet, after all, love is a tyrant and a
traitor, a meteor rushing with blind fury
among the placid orbs of life. What is
a man to make of these wild contrasts
and tragical transitions ? At one mo-
ment the lover seems to be on the pin-
nacle of felicity, " his soul sowced, im-
paradised, imprisoned in his lady ; he
can do nothing, think of nothing but her ;
she is his cynosure, Hesperus, and Ves-
per, his morning and evening star, his
goddess, his mistress, his life, his soul,
his everything ; dreaming, waking, she
is always in his mouth ; his heart, eyes,
ears, and all his thoughts are full of her."
But then something goes wrong and the
note is altogether changed. " When this
young gallant is crossed in his love, he
laments, and cries, and roars downright.
k The virgin 's gone and I am gone,
she 's gone, she 's gone, and what sha
I do ? Where shall I find her ? whom
shall I ask ? what will become of me ?
I am weary of this life, sick, mad, am
desperate.' '
It becomes the sage, then, to be clear
of these toys. If he is to write aboi
Love Melancholy, let him cure it. Let
him hold up a warning to the unwary.
What is the use of days and nights spent
in toiling over learned authors, if the
young and foolish are not to have the
benefit of one's experience ? If only the
young and foolish would profit ! If onlj
the unwary would beware ! Still we
must do our part. Let us remind thei
that beauty fades. It is a rather well-
known fact, but youth is so prone to for-
get it. " Suppose thou beholdest hei
in a frosty morning, in cold weather,
some passion or perturbation of mine
weeping, chafing, etc., riveled and ill
favored to behold. . . . Let her use
helps art and nature can yield ; be likt
her, and her, and whom thou wilt, or
these in one ; a little sickness, a fever,
small-pox, wound, scar, loss of an eye or
limb, a violent passion, mars all in
instant, disfigures all." Then let us ex-
alt the charms of a bachelor's life. It
has its weak points, as I feel, writing
here alone in the dust and chill, with nc
thing but books about me, no prattle of
children, no merry chatter of busy we
men. But what then ? It is quieter,
after all. " Consider how contentedly,
quietly, neatly, plentifully, sweetly, anc
how merrily he lives ! He hath no mar
to care for but himself, none to please
no charge, none to control him, is tied
no residence, no cure to serve, may
and come when, whither, live where
will, his own master, and do what
list himself." Nevertheless, it all soum
a little hollow, and as I sit here in tl
winter midnight with my old pipe,
An Odd Sort of Popular Book.
553
wonder if it might not have been other-
wise.
I have made my quotations with very
little skill, if the ingenious reader does
not by this time feel that Burton was in
his way a great master of style. His
skill and power as a writer, more than
anything else, show that he was not a
mere pedant or Dryasdust. It is true,
he himself disclaims any such futile pre-
occupation. He lias not " amended the
style, which now flows I'emissly, as it
was first conceived." His book is " writ
with as small deliberation as I do or-
dinarily speak, without all affectation
of big words, fustian phrases, jingling
terms." But the facts belie him, and one
shudders to think what must have been
his idea of the big words he does not
use. . A careful collation of the first edi-
tion of the Anatomy with the last pub-
lished in the author's lifetime not only
shows a great number of additions and
alterations, but proves conclusively that
these changes were made, in many cases,
with a view to style and to style only.
Take a single instance. In the first edi-
tion Burton wrote : " If it be so that the
earth is a moon, then are we all lunatic
within." Later he amplified this as fol-
lows, with obvious gain in the beauty of
the phrase : " If it be so that the earth
is a moon, then are we also giddy, ver-
tiginous, and lunatic within this sublu-
nary maze." Amended, I think, but
oh, for the " big words, fustian phrases,
jingling terms " !
Yes, Burton was a master of style.
He could bend language to his ends and
do as he willed with it. If lie is often
rough, harsh, wanton in expression, it
is simply because, like Donne, he chose
to be so. Does he wish to tell a plain
story ? Who can do it more lightly, sim-
ply, briefly ? " An ass and a mule went
laden over a brook, the one with salt, the
other with wool ; the mule's pack was wet
by chance ; the salt melted, his burden
the lighter ; and he thereby much eased.
He told the ass, who, thinking to speed
as well, wet his pack likewise at the next
water ; but it was much the heavier, he
quite tired."
Does he wish to paint the foul and
horrible ? I know of nothing in Swift
or Zola more replete with the luxury
of hideousness than the unquotable de-
scription of the defects which infatuated
love will overlook, — a description which
Keats tells a correspondent he would give
his favorite leg to have written. Here,
as in so many passages I have quoted,
Burton piles up epithet after epithet, till
it seems as if the dictionary would be
exhausted, — a trick which, by the bye,
he may have caught from Rabelais, and
which would become very monotonous,
if it were not applied with such wonder-
ful variety and fertility.
Then, at his will, the magician can
turn with ease from the bitter to the
sweet. When he touches love or beauty,
all his ruggedness is gone. His words
become full of grace, of suave, vague
richness, of delicacy, of mystery, as in
the phrase which Southey quotes in The
Doctor : " For peregrination charms our
senses with such unspeakable and sweet
variety that some count him unhappy
that never traveled, a kind of prisoner,
and pity his case, that from his cradle to
his old age beholds the same still ; still,
still the same, the same." Or, to take a
more elaborate picture, see this, which
might be a Tintoretto or a Spenser :
" Witty Lucian, in that pathetical love-
passage or pleasant description of Jupi-
ter's stealing of Europa and swimming
from Phoanicia to Crete, makes the sea
calm, the winds hush, Neptune and Am-
phitrite riding in their chariot to break
the waves before them, the Tritons dan-
cing round about with every one a torch ;
the sea-nymphs, half-naked, keeping time
on dolphins' backs and singing Hyme-
naeus ; Cupid nimbly tripping on the top
of the waters ; and Venus herself coming
after in a shell, strawing roses and flow-
ers on their heads."
I have dwelt thus long on Burton's
554
Content.
style because it is absolutely characteris-
tic, and because it proves by its eminent
artistic qualities that he was not simply
a compiler and quoter, but a thinking
and feeling man, a strong, shrewd, pas-
sionate temperament, gazing with in-
tense interest out of his scholastic win-
dows at the strange and moving spectacle
of life. In his fullness and abundance
he, more than any other English author,
recalls Montaigne, whom he quotes so
frequently : he has less fluidity, more
conventional prejudice, but also more sin-
cerity, more robust moral force'. Again,
he in a certain sense resembles a greater
than Montaigne, his own greatest con-
temporary, Shakespeare, whom he also
quotes enough to show that he knew and
loved his writings, at any rate, if not
himself. Shakespeare's work is like a glo-
rious piece of tapestry, a world of rich
and splendid hues, woven into a thou-
sand shapes of curious life. Burton's
is like the reverse side of the same : all
the bewildering wealth of color, but
rough, crude, misshapen, undigested.
One of the characteristic oddities of
Burton's style is his perpetual use of the
phrase etc. When his quick and fluent
pen has heaped together all the nouns or
adjectives in heaven and in earth, and
in the waters under the earth, he com-
pletes the picture with the vast, vague
gesture of an etc. Take an often-quoted
passage in the introduction, in which he
describes his own life as an observer and
contemplator : " Now come tidings of
weddings, maskings, mummeries, enter-
tainments, jubilees, embassies, tilts and
tournaments, trophies, triumphs, revels,
sports, plays ; then again, as in a new-
shifted scene, treasons, cheating tricks,
robberies, enormous villanies in all kinds,
funerals, burials, death of princes, new
discoveries, expeditions, now comical,
then tragical matters ; to-day we hear of
new lords and officers created, to-mor-
row of some great men deposed, and
again of fresh honors conferred ; one is
let loose, another imprisoned ; one pur-
chaseth, another breaketh ; he thrives,
his neighbor turns bankrupt ; now plenty,
then again dearth and famine ; one runs,
another rides, wrangles, laughs, weeps,
etc."
So we may sum up The Anatomy of
Melancholy in an etc. The general tone
of the book, with its infinite multiplicity,
reminds one of nothing more than of the
quaint blending of mirth, mystery, and
spiritual awe so deliciously expressed in
Stevenson's baby couplet, —
" The world is so full of a number of things,
I 'm sure we should all be as happy as kings."
Only Burton would have laid a mischiev-
ous and melancholy emphasis on should.
Gamaliel Bradford, Jr.
CONTENT.
WHEN of this flurry thou shalt have thy fill,
The thing thou seekest, it will seek thee then :
The heavens repeat themselves in waters still
And in the faces of contented men.
John Vance Cheney.
When I Practised Medicine.
555
WHEN I PRACTISED MEDICINE.
THE manner of my initiation was this.
There was living in the town of Wheat-
land an old man who knew everybody in
the county, for indeed he had helped a
good part of the inhabitants into this vale
of tears, and, to speak truly, I fear had
hastened the departure from it of not a
few. This was the celebrated Dr. John
Claggett, the greatest story-teller, the best
companion with whom to share a mint
julep, the welcome guest at every wed-
ding, the friend of every child, the good
physician, whose presence was worth a
moderate sickness. For he brought the
latest news from the farthest borders of
the county ; he had stories new as well
as old ; he played practical jokes in, as it
seemed, the presence of death itself, and
drove pain off with hearty human laugh-
ter. Perhaps the wit was rather too
Elizabethan for the taste of to-day. Here
was one that the country people liked
more than the aroma of humor; they
wanted to taste it, and thought that a
joke, like whiskey, improved with age.
Mother, and then daughter, had listened
to it without shame. It is a wedding, —
not complete without the Doctor. Two,
three, perhaps more, glasses of apple-jack
have been drunk ; it 's time to break
up, but first the Doctor must salute the
bride. This he does, and adds, with a
meaning look, " I '11 see you later," an-
swered by a push and a " La, Doctor ! "
from the buxom bride, and a fatuous
giggle from the embarrassed groom. I
fear we were not a refined people, but
then, on the other hand, we were not
divorced and married again the same
day !
It came to pass, then, that this man —
now, as I say, growing old — saw one
day in the village street a child whom he
did not know. And as that was a most
remarkable thing, he stopped him and
easily learned that he had not long been
there, and that he lived on the Hill next
to the Academy. Whereupon, Dr. Clag-
gett remembered that he was on his way
to that very house to see a lady there, —
which was strange, for he was going in
an opposite direction when the child met
him. However, they returned to the
house, the child about seven, and the man
nearly ten times as old.
What talk went on behind the Vene-
tian blinds in the parlor the little boy
— swinging on the gate until the reap-
pearance of his new friend — did not
learn till years after, but when the Doc-
tor reappeared he heard, " No books nor
school, — give him to me and he '11 live,
and I '11 make a man of him."
Next morning at nine o'clock I stood
before the Doctor's house, — red brick,
with a high stoop built along the front.
An alleyway, arched over, gave protec-
tion to a little brown mare, hitched to a
staple in the wall, and kept the rain from
a buggy that was splashed to the top with
cakes of yellow mud that had dried and
made the whole vehicle almost invisible
at a distance, so near was it to the color
of the crossroads. In this vehicle I was
destined to ride for the next two years,
every day save Sunday, as the compan-
ion, the friend, and, as he said, the col-
league of the man who had the largest
practice in the county. In that way I
began to practise medicine.
The little brown mare, named Lucy,
turned to the right, and, passing through
the square, turned to the right again on
the Sharpesburg pike, then to the left,
and stretched herself comfortably east-
ward on the Frederick road toward the
blue mountains, shining like a long tur-
quoise in the early winter sun.
" Do you know where you are going ? "
said my new, indeed my first friend.
" No, sir."
556
When I Practised Medicine.
" Well, you are going to Jerusalem
across the river Jordan."
Oh, the terror of that drive ! It must
be death, or at least endless exile, that
affronted me. " Jerusalem and Jor-
dan " — I knew the names. Indeed,
they represented all I knew of geo-
graphy. They were far away, I knew.
Could I ever return ? I think here I
should have wept had I not been roused
from my sad forebodings by Lucy's stop-
ping at the toll gate. A wonderful place,
that ! What authority resided here !
Why, even the tow-headed boy sitting
on the fence could swing that bar to,
and all the traffic would cease. " There
wa'n't nobody dasen't go through when
the bar was swung in." I did not know
that then, but I learned it later from
the same tow-headed boy, when he be-
came my friend. The toll keeper was a
shoemaker, too, and well-mannered peo-
ple drove close to the step, so that he had
only to reach out a hand to take the fare.
A woman came through the orchard,
where she had been feeding hens, to have
a chat with the old Doctor.
" Why, my sakes, Doctor, where did
you get that child ? He ain't one o'
yourn, be he ? "
" No sir-ree," was the emphatic an-
swer. " This is a celebrated doctor from
Virginia, and he 's going to practise med-
icine with me from the Blue Ridge to
the Connococheague, and to-day we are
bound 'cross the Jordan to Jerusalem."
They all laughed, and I whispered pit-
eously to the woman, —
" Is it far ? "
"No, honey, 't ain't no ways now.
And don't you mind the old Doctor. He
ain't happy 'less he 's foolin' somebody."
Here the Doctor laughed, too, and
clucked to Lucy, and we climbed the long
bill, from the top of which are seen, di-
rectly below, the sluggish yellow waters
of the Antietam, spanned by a single arch
of blue limestone, the wooden covering
of the bridge's wall painted bright red.
The sycamore trees growing on the
banks touched their outmost branches a
midstream, and the old red brick flo
mill shook with the whirl of the wheel,
the yellow stream became white and
creamy as it fell over the fall, and beyond
the mill lay Funkstown, a hamlet with-
out a comely building, and yet made
beautiful by stately silver poplars which
bordered the street, and gardens sur-
rounding every house.
"There ! This is Jerusalem, and that
is the river Jordan, that we 've crossed ;
and, yes, there they are, — in that win-
dow, bull's eyes, — two for a penny, —
and soon we shall be going home."
Oh, how proud the child was that he
had not cried ! He laughed, too, with a
new sensation. He had become conscious
of thought ! This wise old man had
taken a child, who needed rousing and
an interest to make it seem worth while
to life to keep in its delicate frame,
and plunged it into the cold water of
apprehension, and now it was tingling
with the reaction of satisfaction. Like
many puzzles, the explanation was simple.
The Dunkers had a yearly baptism in
the Antietam, hence the Antietam be-
came Jordan, and Funkstown, Jerusalem.
A parable, if you will, of the power of
faith. For, as the early Italian painters
dressed the Magi and the Holy Family
in the gorgeous robes of Venice or Ve-
rona, and saw no incongruity, so these
simple-minded peasants, — for they were
little more, — in the illustration of the
great experience, saw the insignificant
stream changed to the river that cleansed
Naaman, and the mean little village into
the city of the great King.
This was the beginning of an edu
tion, impossible in school, of course, b
most important. I mean the education
of teasing. It is like teaching a puppy
to jump by holding the dainty a little
higher than he can reach. It is a sort
of mental tickling, that may indeed be-
come cruel, but is, in kindly hands, a
delicious experience. And I think, in all
the pharmacopoeia of that day there was
11 to
::
ion
When I Practised Medicine.
557
no better medicine than that of which I
learned in my first day's practice.
This day was typical of hundreds of
days, when we drove briskly, for five or
six miles, over the well-kept pikes, and
then turned to some " dirt road," to fol-
low it perhaps for three or four miles,
sometimes fairly good in dry weather,
until the red dust choked us, then deep
in mud, when the frost broke up the
ground. I can hear it now, the slow
suck of the wheel out of the mud, the
splash, the jar, as we sank to the hub in
some deep hole. No better trade could
be followed than that of blacksmith and
wheelwright. Wheels would go down
into that mud and come out crumpled
like paper. Slowly, on three wheels and
a rail under the axle, taken from the
snake fence, we would crawl back to the
pike, where we would find some sort of
wheel to take us home.
But if the roads were bad, they were
beautiful. Deep groves of hickory, up
and down which scampered gray squir-
rels, while their poor relations, the chip-
munks, flashed along the rail fences, and
in a twinkling were gone. In wide woods
of oak and chestnut the jay birds would
scream and show their colors, like an an-
gry woman shaking a petticoat ; the cat-
bird would sing from the walnut tree,
while off in the field would be heard the
red - headed woodpecker, tapping, tap-
ping with insistent stroke.
I was shown, too, the great buzzard, the
filthy scavenger, — which whoever killed
would be fined five dollars, — resting as
securely on the air as a duck on the
water, motionless as a cloud.
The Doctor would whistle " Bob
White," until the partridges, as we called
them, answering from the stubble field,
showed where the covies were hid.
But we must not linger on the road.
The farmhouse to which we are bound
is across the stream. Bridges span it
on every pike, but the dirt roads run to
the ford and stop. I soon thought no-
thing of driving into the stream when
the water was so deep as to cover the
floor of the buggy, when I had to sit
on my feet, and the Doctor placed his
on the dashboard. Then would come a
queer feeling as the jar of the horse's mo-
tion suddenly ceased, and it was swim-
ming.
I saw a vast deal of practice, I assure
you. Beside children's diseases, we had
quinsy sore throats and congestion of the
lungs, as well as pneumonia, and what
I wrongly pronounced " Chilson fever."
But generally we diagnosed the case as
liver trouble, and treated accordingly.
Sometimes we gave calomel in pills, but
we thought we got better effects from
powders ; the pills were so large and
were so unevenly covered with a bitter
powder, — and, though I became expert
in rolling them, still they would bulge
and stick and gag the people, who either
could not swallow them, or else had later
accidents, — that, as I say, we thought
best of powders. And when I say pow-
ders, have you in mind a dainty paper
with a pinch of salt, as it were, within
its ingenious folds ? Go to ! Do you
think we were mere homoeopathists ?
We gave it in a teaspoon filled from a
frequently replenished bottle carried in
the Doctor's capacious side pocket !
This was the favorite medicine with
patient and physician. No more grate-
ful compliment carne to the professional
ear than the familiar " I tell you, Doctor,
that last dose took hold right smart," re-
ceived with the complacent " Well, I
reckoned it would." When salivation
ensued, and the poor wretch had not a
yellow tooth that did not rattle as he
praised our skill, and the rebellious
stomach refused to assimilate juicy spare
ribs and the hot Sally Lunn, we gave him
bumpers of bicarbonate of soda mixed
with Brown's Essence of Jamaica Ginger.
He was taught that the disease was work-
ing out of the system, and that the ghastly
symptoms were the inevitable sequelae
of a mysterious dispensation, which they
probably were !
558
When I Practised Medicine.
Calomel was our favorite, I must ad-
mit; but we had others. I think jalap
stood next highest in our estimation. We
gave it once with curious results. As I
have retired from practice, I am happy
to share the results of my experience with
my confreres.
We were called to see a little boy
suffering with inflammatory rheumatism.
Poor little chap, when asked what the
trouble was, he said he had " a short leg."
We cut long strips of linen, and having
steeped them in a cold solution of bicar-
bonate of soda, wrapped the limb firmly,
and gave directions to have them changed
frequently. I dare say we left a little
paregoric to ease the pain at night, and
started to go. But before we reached
the door, the Doctor paused and rubbed
his chin thoughtfully. It was unusual,
for, as a rule, he was quick in his deci-
sions. Then he drew forth a bottle of
jalap and returned to the bed. " Which
do you like best, scraped apple or currant
jelly?"
" I hate 'em both ! " cried the poor
little mite, who knew what was coming.
Perhaps we decided on scraped apple.
This was my department. I scraped out
a little and spread it in a spoon, then
the powder was poured on, and after that
there was a covering of apple, but the
weight would cause the powder to ooze
out on the sides, so that an idiot would
not have been deceived. The child,
small blame, would not open his mouth.
The Doctor held the nose, compressing
the nostrils so that the lips must open
to gasp, then the spoon was slipped in,
and being deftly turned upside down and
slowly withdrawn, not a particle of this
precious dose was lost.
When we paid our next morning
visit, the child looked to me as one dead,
but the Doctor felt his pulse and skin
and said he was better. But the mother
was angry. She said suddenly : " That
child liked to died in the night. He
nigh had a spasm. He was that sick to
his stomach he could n't speak, and I
don't hold with givin' no such doses to
no child, — so there ! "
" Well," said the Doctor slowly, " I 've
seen a heap of rheumatism in my time,
and the best thing for it is exercise.
That child couldn't exercise, and that
little jalap just stretched all his muscles
a bit when it was acting, and now he 's
going to get well. He don't need any
more medicine, but keep those wet band-
ages on his leg."
We gave bushels of quinine, in tea to
women, in whiskey, more plentiful than
tea, to the men. I have spoken of cal-
omel as the trump card which we played
in the game with death, but I am not
sure that we did not oftener take the
trick with the lancet. We were ham-
pered by no modern septicaemic fears.
The little instrument, arranged with an
ingenious spring to prevent its opening,
was carried in the vest pocket along
with a plug of tobacco, a toothpick, and
odds and ends of every sort. I doubt if
there was a day we did not find use for
it. We bled for headaches and fevers ;
we bled for congestion of the lungs ; we
bled the negroes for their ills, generally
designated by the generic term " misery."
The first day there was bloodletting
I was given a basin, and told if I dropped
it I should be bled. I did not drop it,
but had I been bled, I doubt if blood
could have been found in my scared
little body ! Once we bled a negro woman
who must have weighed nearly three
hundred pounds. I can see now her
great arm like polished ebony ! The
Doctor asked me if I knew what blue
blood was. I said I did.
" I suppose you think you have it ? "
With dignity, I answered, " Yes."
He laughed and said, "Well, I'm
going to show you real blue blood." And
he did !
I squatted on the floor, caught the
blood in a yellow earthen dish, while the
Doctor — his back to the patient — bt
gan one of his marvelous stories to an
admiring group collected on the back
When I Practised Medicine.
559
porch. I caught, " We 've got the clear-
est air in the world right here in this
county. Why, last October I was on the
Blue Ridge, and, standing on Black Rock,
I looked to the town, ten miles away as
the crow flies, and on the roof of the Lu-
theran Church I saw two pigeons, and
the air was so clear I could make out
which was white and which was purple ! "
— A delighted murmur of "Oh, Doc-
tor ! " — " It 's the truth ; I '11 explain
it." But he never did.
The poor soul I was watching had
by this time lost so much blood that the
ebony had become like ashes, her head
lolled from side to side, and I heard her
murmur, " I 'se going, honey, for shore."
I burst into tears, the Doctor turned
quickly, called for whiskey, bound up
the arm, and the danger was over. May
I never come so near to murder again.
It was a strenuous life the old man
led. I shared only the forenoon practice,
but often I saw him pale and heavy-eyed
in the morning, and learned that he had
driven twenty miles in the night. Yet
he was always cheerful.
He was fond of betting, and he intro-
duced me to that fascinating pastime. I
only remember my first bet, — but it was
a sample of them all. We saw a field of
potatoes which the farmer had gathered
in heaps, and the Doctor said, —
" I suppose nothing sees so much as a
potato."
" Why, Doctor, a potato can't see."
" Why not ? "
" It has no eyes."
"Why, it has more eyes than you
have, and if you don't believe me, I '11
bet you a ' fip and a bit,' and leave it to
your mother."
This seemed easy. My mother looked
startled, but made no criticism, and the
fascinating sport continued till I owed
sixty-five cents. I saved with great diffi-
culty seventeen cents, and was then com-
pelled by my mother to offer it as an
installment. The dear old man looked at
me a moment with shining eyes, and said,
" Tell your mother the reason I 'm
rich is because I never receive partial
payments."
I repeated the message, not under-
standing one word of it, but it was the
end of my career as a gambler !
Of course we talked politics, and I
understood the Doctor to say that he was
an old " Lion Whig." So that I soon
announced that I, too, belonged to that
royal party. When the great election —
the most momentous of all elections —
was held, I repaired to the stable of the
Washington House, where the embryonic
statesmen, from ten years old to fifteen,
had decided to vote. There was only one
question asked by the tellers : —
" Breckinridge or Douglas ? "
I answered, " Bell and Everett."
" Are you crazy or sassy? " they cried.
" I 'm an old Lion Whig ! " I roared.
" Oh, you are, are you ? Well, we '11
Lion Whig you." And they did !
When I recounted with tears my ex-
perience to the Doctor, he shook his
head.
" I reckon, sonny, now they 've elected
that Black Republican Abe Lincoln, you
and I are the last of the 'old Lion
Whigs.' " And as usual he was right.
Soon after this there was a bitter
storm of sleet, and there was a case that
kept us till late in the afternoon. We
had dinner at the farmhouse. I was
kept in the kitchen with the men, while
the women and the Doctor stayed up-
stairs. All was very still, and later
moaning and words of cheer, — then, a
great cry that made my heart stand
still. Finally the Doctor came.
"Is it over ? " said a man who had
not spoken all day.
" Yes, she '11 pull through. It was
twins, and the chloroform gave out."
But there was no buoyancy in his
voice, and as he drove home he shivered
more than once. The next morning he
was too ill to move, and Lucy was led
back to the stable.
It was etiquette with us that when a
560
Books New and Old.
doctor fell ill, the oldest physician in the
town should have charge of the case, while
all the others came in in consultation.
There were thirteen in this town of less
than three thousand inhabitants, and they
all went through that sickroom, follow-
ing Dr. Ireland, the dean, and looked
wise. Then the Doctor sent for me. He
said there was no luck in odd numbers,
and, more than that, I understood his
constitution ! I spent many hours with
him, and we talked of everything except
medicine.
But he did not get well.
" I think some men have to get sick
to get rested," he said one day, when my
face must have showed what I feared, —
for indeed I feared greatly, most of all
because he took no medicine. So at last
I spoke.
" Doctor," I said, " would calomel or
jalap do ? Or, I know how to bleed."
All the old fun flushed his face as he
said, —
"Doctor, it wouldn't be etiquette
without Dr. Ireland. Besides, dear little
boy, burnt brandy would n't help me
now." The next day he died.
The town was as full of spring carts
and bug-gies and saddle horses the day
he was buried as if it had been the day
of the county fair. The negroes, break-
ing the bonds of their Protestantism,
prayed aloud in the streets for his soul,
— and the clergyman said : —
" This man sought neither riches nor
honor, but gave himself for others.
Fifty years from now his name may be
a faint memory, but I think he was one
of those whom God depends upon to
keep the world good, and to bless little
children by his gentleness and purity
and cheerfulness."
And all the people said, " Amen."
Leighton Parks.
BOOKS NEW AND OLD.
BYWAYS OF LITERATURE.
MB. HENRY JAMES once said of
Thoreau, "He was more than provin-
cial ; he was parochial. " The remark
has so much the air of finality, it is
so obviously a statement of fact, that
one's first instinct is to bolt it without
ado. Presently, it may be, that mild
inward monitor which does so much to
conserve the eupeptic mind suggests
that fact is not truth, and that the
morsel will bear reconsideration. What
is it to be provincial ? and what is it
supposed to do or undo for a man or
his work? One has heard it said that
London itself is provincial. Certainly
Mr. James's cosmopolitanism has not
kept him from dwelling among and
upon a class of Londoners whose local
preoccupation, if this were the point at
issue, is quite equal to that of a New
England villager. But local preoccu-
pation is not the point; to be provin-
cial is to be in a sense unpresentable,
to hail patently, as we may fancy Mr.
James saying, from an ineligible some-
where.
The cosmopolitan idea has apparentlj
given us a new standard of eligibility.
People used to take the grand tour for
their souls' good; but they "draggec
at each remove a lengthening chain.'
They traveled to become more worthy
of staying at home. They did not
dream that absenteeism would come
be held actually a state of grace. Tht
would hardly have seen the point ot
that witty comment upon Mr. Jame
"To be truly cosmopolitan a man mus
Books New and Old.
561
be at home even in his own country."
It is something, after all, to be indige-
nous. Thoreau had his own simple phi-
losophy as to home-staying. "There is
no more tempting novelty," he writes,
"than this new November. No going
to Europe or to another world is to be
named with it. Give me the old fa-
miliar walk, post-office and all, with
this ever new self, with this infinite ex-
pectation and faith which does not know
when it is beaten. We '11 go nutting
once more. We '11 pluck the nut of
the world and crack it in the winter
evenings. Theatres and all other sight-
seeing are puppet-shows in comparison.
I will take another walk to the cliff,
another row on the river, another skate
on the meadow, be out in the first snow,
and associate with the winter birds."
i.
It is surprising how many books
which the world preserves are built
upon local observation and anecdote.
Natural historians have not a few to
their credit; there seems to be some
property in this gentle trade which
gives especial kindliness to the pen.
The printed word of a Thoreau, a Jef-
feries, a John Muir, has a richness
and mellowness which seem to come
direct from soil and sun. Even when
a naturalist's facts are discredited by
later authority, his writing is likely
to be cherished as literature. Gilbert
White was one of the few careful ob-
servers of his time, and is still much
more than a name to naturalists, his
swallow speculations to the contrary.
Nevertheless, the editor of the latest
reprint l puts the case for White in a
way which can hardly be disputed :
"Tis as a literary monument, there-
fore, I hold, that we ought above all
things to regard these rambling and
1 The Natural History of Selborne. By GIL-
BERT WHITE. Edited by GRANT ALLEN, and
illustrated by W. H. NEW. London and New
York : John Lane. 1903.
VOL. xcin. — NO. 558. 36
amiable Letters. They enshrine for
us in miniature the daily life of an
amateur naturalist in the days when
the positions of parson, sportsman,
country gentleman and man of science
were not yet incongruous." Mr. Al-
len has treated the text successfully
from this point of view, marking here
and there a point of error, but for the
most part confining his notes to the
suggestion of additional facts about the
man or the place.
Richard Jefferies was White's most
notable English successor. His work
has not the background of a serene ex-
istence like White's. It is more tense,
more imaginative, more consciously en-
dowed with the quality of literature.
Wild Life in a Southern County, one
of the best of Jefferies's books, has just
been reprinted in Boston, — with an
unfortunate change of title.2 As a
study of the author's native habitat it
bears some analogy to Thoreau 's Wai-
den. Its range of subject is broader,
however, for Jefferies was as keen an
observer of rustic human types and
manners as of the objects more com-
monly admitted to be within the pro-
vince of the natural historian. He
was the son of a Wiltshire farmer;
early proved himself unfit for farm
life, read much, became a journalist,
and wrote a series of worthless novels ;
at last, as if by chance, hit upon his
right vein, produced the five or six
books upon which his reputation rests,
and died at thirty-nine. His distin-
guishing trait is a sort of brooding
quietude, a gentle poignancy of attitude
toward the visible world and its crea-
tures. He is, it seems, never very far
from the elegiac mood: "Just outside
the trench, almost within reach, there
lies a small white something, half hid-
den by the grass. It is the skull of a
hare, bleached by the winds and the
2 An English Village. By RICHARD JEF-
FERIES. With Illustrations by CLIFTON JOHN-
SON, and an Introduction by HAMILTON W.
MABIE. Boston : Little, Brown & Co. 1903.
562
Books New and Old.
dew and the heat of the summer sun.
The skeleton has disappeared, nothing
but the bony casing of the head remains,
with its dim suggestiveness of life, pol-
ished and smooth from the friction of
the elements. Holding it in the hand,
the shadow falls into and darkens the
cavities once filled by the wistful eyes
which whilom glanced down from the
summit here upon the sweet clover-
fields beneath. Beasts of prey and
wandering dogs have carried away the
bones of the skeleton, dropping them
far apart ; the crows and the ants doubt-
less had their share of the carcass."
Alas, poor Yorick! Just here the
mourning note is obvious ; elsewhere it
is a mere over-tone, as in this impres-
sion of a moment in an old village bel-
fry: "Against the wall up here are
iron clamps to strengthen the ancient
fabric, settling somewhat in its latter
days ; and, opening the worm-eaten
door of the clock-case — the key stands
in it — you may study the works of the
old clock for a full hour, if so it please
you; for the clerk is away laboring in
the field, and his aged wife, who pro-
duced the key of the church and pointed
the way across the nearest meadow, has
gone to the spring. The ancient build-
ing, standing lonely on the hill, is ut-
terly deserted ; the creak of the boards
under foot or the grate of the rusty
hinge sounds hollow and gloomy. But
a streak of sunlight enters from the ar-
row-slit, a bee comes in through the
larger open windows with a low inquir-
ing buzz ; there is a chattering of spar-
rows, the peculiar shrill screech of the
swifts, and a ' jack-daw-jack-daw '-ing
outside. The sweet scent of clover and
of mown grass comes upon the light
breeze — mayhap the laughter of hay-
makers passing through the churchyard
underneath to their work, and idling
by the way as haymakers can idle."
Another characteristic of Jefferies is
his strongly developed sense of color,
which leads him to dwell often upon
the purely pictorial quality of the
smaller landscape which he knows best.
It may be the mosaic of an orchard
with its many-tinted fruits ; or the
simpler chromatic scale of a ripen-
ing meadow : "All the summer through
fresh beauties, indeed, wait upon the
owner's footsteps. In the spring the
mowing-grass rises thick, strong, and
richly green, or hidden by the cloth-
of-gold thrown over it by the butter-
cups. He knows when it is ready for
the scythe without reference to the
almanac, because of the brown tint
which spreads over it from the ripening
seeds, sometimes tinged with a dull
red, when the stems of the sorrel are
plentiful. At first the aftermath has
a trace of yellow, as if it were fading ;
but a shower falls, and fresh green
blades shoot up. "
It is impossible, in short, to read
this book without being conscious of
impact with a nature singularly suscep-
tible to impression and rich in expres-
sion. It is to be hoped that many
American readers who may have re-
mained ignorant of Jefferies will make
use of this volume to scrape acquain-
tance with him.
il.
Within recent years several books
have been produced in America which
have done for one or another country-
side much what Jefferies did for Wilt-
shire and Thoreau for Walden. Mr.
Burroughs's A Year in the Fields,1 so
often reprinted, has been given another
form. It is a record of what the sea-
sons bring to an acute and genial ob-
server on the Hudson. The book has
the qualities of wholesomeness and sim-
plicity which are so common in provin-
cial writing, and which are not a little
diverting to cosmopolitan critics. The
reader, if he gives himself a chance,
carries away a grateful sense of con-
1 A Year in the Fields. By JOHN BUB-
ROUGHS. Boston and New York : Houghton
Mifflin & Co. 1903.
Books New and Old.
563
tact with air and soil, of having given
the slip, for the moment at least, to
everything silly and morbid and insin-
cere.
Mr. Torrey's 1 natural laboratory lies
farther east, and his field is suburban
rather than rural. The present note-
book is frankly and agreeably Bostonian
in flavor. Dr. Holmes would have
delighted in it, not only for its neigh-
borhood lore, but for its suave and un-
obtrusive humor, its irrepressible un-
dercurrent of (shall we say) Waltonian
moralizing. The present commentator
has had some acquaintance with Mr.
Torrey's work for a long time, but he
has never been so much impressed with
its mellowness and individuality as in
reading this volume. He confesses to
having proceeded from cover to cover
at one sitting, — not a fair way to treat
a book, but not a bad tribute to it.
This series of papers is a record not
only of natural things seen, but of a
natural flow of thought and feeling.
The author's habit of ruminative dis-
cursus accounts largely for his charm;
and the New England reader, at least,
will find nothing to balk at even in
serious passages like this : —
"A strange thing it is, an astonish-
ing impertinence, that a man should
assume to own a piece of the earth;
himself no better than a wayfarer upon
it ; alighting for a moment only ; com-
ing he knows not whence, going he
knows not whither. Yet convention
allows the claim. Men have agreed
to foster one another's illusions in this
regard, as in so many others. They
knew, blindly, before any one had the
wit to say it in so many words, that
' life is the art of being well deceived. '
And so they have made you owner of
this acre or two of woodland. All the
power of the State would be at your
service, if necessary, in maintaining
the title."
1 The Clerk of the Woods. By BRADFORD
TORREY. Boston and New York : Honghton,
Mifflin & Co. 1903.
This would be dull enough — one
would have the right to be resentful —
if it were a text for some socialistic
propaganda. But as a purely sponta-
neous speculation it has its effective
value. The suggestion is made and
dropped; it is a thought, not a theory.
Mr. Torrey, in short, has several of the
rarer qualifications of that rare person,
the essayist.
Next to the Ground 2 is another book
which should have a fair chance of sur-
vival among books of this order. It
gives a remarkably minute description
of life, both natural and human, upon
a large country place in Tennessee.
It deals in an orderly but not me-
chanical way with methods of farming,
with the habits of wild and domestic
animals, with hunting, with trees and
flowers, insects, local sounds and odors,
with types of negro, poor white, and
country gentleman. The author seems,
indeed, the complete chronicler of the
conditions of country life upon a large
Tennessee estate. Her book, like all
faithful studies of this sort which are
fortunate enough to possess that right-
ness of expression which is called liter-
ary, is likely to appeal not less to out-
siders than to Tennesseeans. Of natural
history proper the chronicle contains
not a little. It is all presented in
a vigorous idiomatic style, — a style
full of local flavor, and embellished
here and there with delightful provin-
cialisms, or rather (for most of them
are as old as Shakespeare) archaisms.
Here is an interesting bit of wood- lore ;
the passage may serve as a fair exam-
i O «/
pie of the author's matter and man-
ner: —
"Trees felled as the new wood is
hardening give the very best timber,
provided the trunks are at once lopped
of boughs and branches. Should they
lie as they fall, with all their leaves
and twigs, the wood becomes brash and
2 Next to the Ground. By MARTHA Mo-
CULLOCH WILLIAMS. New York : McClure,
Phillips & Co. 1902.
564
Books New and Old.
lifeless. . . . Whether wind - felled,
or ax-felled, the timber lasts twice as
long as that cut in May or June. Big
trees do not sprout after August cut-
ting, and even tenacious shrubs like
sassafras often die of it. Indeed,
there is a short period in the month
when woody things die almost at a
touch. The stroke of an ax, a wheel
jolting roughly over an exposed root,
the wrenching of a branch, or a slight
wound to the bark may be fatal then
to the tallest, sturdiest oak. Greenly
alive to-day, to-morrow it may be with-
ered to the tip, and next week dry and
dead. "
The American desert has had more
than one chronicler of late. Mrs. Aus-
tin does more than any one else has
done to make us feel the personality
of this Land of Little Rain,1 this Coun-
try of Lost Borders. Fiction has told
us enough and more than enough of the
mere horrors of desert experience. On
the other hand, Professor John Van
Dyke not long ago constituted himself
a sort of champion of the desert. He
wished to make us understand, more
than anything else, the physical beauty
of these waste places. He spoke, how-
ever, rather as an enthusiastic visitor
than as one who knew his subject from
long and intimate experience. He had
an jesthetic appreciation of desert land-
scape, and an intellectual appreciation
of the grandeur of the wilderness as
a symbol. Mrs. Austin unmistakably
loves it for its own sake; it is part
of her life. It has, no doubt, colored
her way of thought and feeling; there
is a touch of grimness in both, not
coming quite to pessimism, not quite
to stoicism, but suggesting them. A
morbid impulse well under control, yet
not without its reactions upon a style
almost too fine, almost too tense : some-
thing like this, whether or not her
theme is responsible for it, one cannot
1 The Land of Little Bain. By MARY AUS-
TIN. Boston and New York : Houghton, Mif-
flin & Co. 1903.
help feeling in Mrs. Austin's work.
Several of these intimate interpreta-
tions (of which more than one origi-
nally appeared in the pages of the At-
lantic) have to do with human life on
the desert frontier. There is no at-
tempt to make mannerly, or even to
make picturesque, the rude conditions
which the writer has to portray; but
she does not find the life unintelligible :
" It is pure Greek in that it represents
the courage to shear off what is not
worth while. . . . Here you have the
repose of the perfectly accepted in-
stinct which includes passion and death
in its perquisites. I suppose that the
end of all our hammering and yawping
will be something like the point of view
of Jimville. The only difference will
be in the decorations."
m.
Footprints of Former Men in Far
Cornwall 2 is a book of pure description
and anecdote, and one of the most de-
lightful among masterpieces of paro-
chial literature. It was first published
some thirty years ago. Its author,
R. S. Hawker, was for a long time
vicar of Morwenstow in Cornwall, a
zealous local antiquary, who had, be-
fore turning his hand to prose, gained
some repute as a ballad-writer. The
combination of functions is significant,
for in the present papers it is hard to
say whether piety or fancy plays the
greater part. By the confession of his
editor, indeed, the Hawkerian fancy
does not scruple now and then to assume
the garb of fact. However, the point
of fact is not the important one. The
sketches are no doubt faithful enough
to the detail of local color to which we
moderns attach so much importance.
For the rest, they possess a style so
forcible, so quaint, so engaging, as to
make one content to waive all possible
2 Footprints of Former Men in Far Cornwall.
By R. S. HAWKEB. London and New York :
John Lane. 1903.
Books New and Old.
565
questions of authenticity. The Rev-
erend Mr. Hawker's professed purpose
was to arrange and set down the le-
gends about certain ancient Cornish
worthies, which he found still current
in his neighborhood. Many of them
have to do with wrecks or castaways
hurled upon the wild Cornish coast.
There, for example, is the story of
Cruel Coppinger, skipper of a Danish
vessel driven ashore during a famous
tempest. Never was there a more
dramatic entrance for a villain: "A
crowd of people had gathered from the
land, on horseback and on foot, women
as well as men, drawn together by
the tidings of a probable wreck. Into
their midst, and to their astonished dis-
may, rushed the dripping stranger: he
snatched from a terrified old dame her
red Welsh cloak, cast it loosely around
him, and bounded suddenly upon the
crupper of a young damsel, who had
ridden her father's horse down to the
beach to see the sight. He grasped
her bridle, and, shouting aloud in some
foreign language, urged on the double-
laden animal into full speed, and the
horse naturally took his homeward
way. " Cruel Coppinger appropriately
marries the damsel, maltreats her and
everybody else, his name becomes a by-
word throughout the countryside, and
he finally disappears to a satisfactory
accompaniment of thunder and light-
ning. The book is not all in this vein,
be it understood. There are passages
of measured description, records of
personal experience, the varied annals
of an ancient and in the main a quiet
neighborhood.
Highways and Byways in South
Wales 1 is a book of a different kind,
but of equal interest and charm. It
is founded on local observation upon a
larger scale ; it covers a considerable
sweep of country, and studies the per-
sonalities of ancient villages and streams
1 Highways and Byways in South Wales. By
W. C. BRADLEY. New York : The Macmillan
Co. 1903.
as well as of ancient men. The author
has produced similar volumes on North
Wales and the Lake District, which
have been extremely popular in Eng-
land. The writer comes to his present
task, therefore, not as an amateur ob-
server, but as a trained and tested pro-
fessional guide. We might expect the
result to be equally edifying and tire-
some, a heavy drag of text brightened
here and there by a facetious anecdote,
or a sally of guidebook sprightliness.
But Mr. Bradley has an unusual en-
dowment of virtues, the greatest of
which is an unaffected love for his
theme. He has not gotten it up in a
few months because there happened to
be a market for the get-up. He is a
student of Welsh topography, history,
legends, literature, manners, and fish,
of many years' standing; and he draws
upon his various stores of learning with
well-bred ease, never in the least em-
phasizing a point of erudition for the
sake of display. "These pages," he
says, "are intended for the armchair
as well as for the traveler," a conces-
sion to the sedentary person which may
relieve him of unnecessary shame in
never having beheld South Wales or
wished to behold it. He will get from
this book all that other men's eyes can
give him ; for to the vivid descriptions
of the text are added some illustrations
by Mr. F. L. Griggs, which, for their
suggestion of mass and color- value, and
for their expression of light, are very
remarkable.
Mr. Bradley 's style is urbane, idio-
matic, leisurely, now and then falling
into a pleasant garrulousness. He
never seems to have exhausted his sub-
ject; yet he knows when it is time to
leave off. One has no sense of his
being busy over his itinerary ; it is easy
traveling with him from first to last.
It does not matter that the pages bris-
tle with Welsh proper names which
offer some obstruction to the Western
eye. Bare feet can make a tolerable
episode of a stubble field if they do not
566
Books New and Old.
go too gingerly. Llwynderw, Gwrth-
reynion, nay, Portrhydfendigaiad, —if
one marches boldly with his head up
and thinks of clover, it is soon by.
We are, at all events, in excellent
company, and shall have, in the main,
excellent "going: " "Here, too . . .
the Welsh border seems marked by a
sudden growth in stature and boldness
of the hills and a louder note in the
music of the streams. For the Black
Mountains on the further or Southern
side of the valley begin here to loom
up into the imposing shapes and alti-
tudes their name and reputation seem to
demand. We on our sides are again
in Radnorshire, skirting its southern
bound, and indeed a road hereabouts
comes plunging down to our smooth
highway, which has struggled painfully
from Kington, but eight miles distant,
over the rugged semi-civilized ridges
of Brilley Mountain. " So goes the way-
side talk ; the passage is taken quite
at random. Here are a few sentences
which perhaps illustrate better the
quaint fluency of Mr. Bradley 's speech:
"It is a trite saying that a mountain-
bred pony will keep himself and his
rider out of trouble in a bog. But a
dry summer will sometimes make both
the mountaineer and his pony a little
over-confident on doubtful ground ; and
again the horseman on a strange moun-
tain may get himself into a labyrinth of
morass, and in casting about for an out-
let, lose touch with the route he came in
by and spend a grievous time, only trust-
ing that the sun may not go down on
his endeavors, if the day should by any
chance be far spent."
The present reviewer does not know
how it may have been with others, but
for him four hundred pages of this kind
of discourse, on a subject of which he
knew nothing and in which he had no
especial interest, have not been too
many. It has been one of those ex-
periences which feelingly assure him
1 Home Life under the Stuarts, 1603-1649.
By ELIZABETH GODFREY. New York : E. P.
that, dim as the beacon of literature
may now burn upon the high places,
there are yet a hundred torches, tipped
with the true fire, glowing steadily here
and there among the byways of a busy
world.
H. W. Boynton.
THE history of State and Church,
Home Life in Letters and Philosophy, dur-
tJe'ntKra- in£ the first half of the sev-
tnry. enteenth century, in a coun-
try which was Shakespeare's England
when those years began, and Milton's
England when they ended, has contin-
uously employed the pens of innumer-
able ready writers, some of whom are
known of all men. Unknown of many,
even of those from whom better things
might be hoped, are the private chron-
icles of a time peculiarly rich in such
memorials. From these, — autobio-
graphies, memoirs, and intimate family
correspondence, — Elizabeth Godfrey
has most skillfully and happily com-
piled a delightful volume,1 giving a
graphic description of the home life of
English people of condition (for they
alone left these records) in those mo-
mentous years which witnessed the pass-
ing of the old order and the stormy be-
ginning of the new. It need hardly be
said that to most of the American read-
ers likely to be attracted by the book,
that England is the one nearest to them
by kindred ties, the England which nur-
tured the adventurers for Virginia, and
the men and women who made New
England.
The author naturally begins her sur-
vey with the nursery, not so easy a
matter to treat as may be supposed,
for the child (not yet The Child) was
far from being a centre of interest,
and even in the letters of affectionate
mothers was taken very much fc
granted. Still, we are given interest-
ing glimpses of baby life and of earl)
education, which began betimes with
Button & Co.; London: Grant Richards.
1903.
Books New and Old.
567
hornbook and sampler in the years
which we should consider infantile.
There is no difficulty in following the
boy to the public school and later to
the university, — he was but a boy
when he went there, — and more than
one of his sisters has left a description
of her education, all very like Anne
Murray's, whose mother "had masters
for teaching my sister and me to write,
speak French, play on the lute and
virginals, and dance, and kept a gentle-
woman to teach us all kinds of needle-
work. . . . We were instructed never
to neglect to begin and end the day
with prayer, and orderly every morn-
ing to read the Bible, and ever to keep
the church as often as there was occa-
sion to meet there either for prayers
or preaching. " This last scarcely needs
to be quoted, for it was an age of in-
tense religious feeling in both parties
in the Church, and religious instruc-
tion was of paramount importance in
all education, public and private. And
England was still the musical country it
had been in the Queen's days, — music
was a necessary part of the training of
boys as well as girls. Says one of the
pupils at Merchant Taylors' : "I was
well instructed in the Hebrew, Greek
and Latin tongues. [My master's]
care was also to encrease my skill in
musique, in which I was brought up
by daily exercise in it, as in singing
and playing upon instruments." But
boyhood and girlhood were soon over.
Very youthful marriages were the rule,
usually matters of parental arrange-
ment, though the children generally
acquiesced readily enough. Occasion-
ally there were those who chose for
themselves, like Dorothy Osborne of
adorable memory; and of both kinds
of union the book gives, we had almost
said, modern instances, so full of liv-
ing, breathing life are the records left,
often by women, — many of whom were
veritable, and most unconscious, hero-
ines when the days of trial came.
But there was a very real heroism.
long before the years of war, which is
not noticed here. The author explains
that the comparatively small attention
given to Puritan life comes only from
lack of material. It is to be regretted
that the letters of John and Margaret
Winthrop, and such other memorials
as remain of the family at Groton, do
not seem to have fallen in her way.
To be sure, these letters give few do-
mestic details, but they show very
vividly the spirit which animated one
Puritan gentleman's household, and
the high level in thought and life, and
the mutual trust and devotion of a
husband and wife, who in middle age
were self-exiled from the pleasant
places that had known them to a pain-
ful wilderness. It should be said that
Miss Godfrey does not carry the con-
tests of the time into her story of its
home life, and she strives bravely to
write impartially, — "at least as far as
she is able." Recognizing this effort,
even the reader, who in no wise shares
her sentiment regarding " the murdered
king, " loiters over the book with great
content; for throughout it is marked
by good taste and sympathetic insight,
and informed by the historic sense.
The volume is attractive in make-up,
and the illustrations are well selected.
But though the temptation to use the
portrait of the little Arabella Stuart
as a frontispiece was doubtless strong,
it should have been resisted. Long
after the child had ceased to play with
her doll, England, including her hap-
less self, was emphatically under a
Tudor. S. M. F.
THE orators and literary historians
Biographi-
cal.
who must soon look to the
sources of preparation for
the Hawthorne centenary will be con-
fronted with no embarrassment but that
of riches. To all the autobiography of
his own volumes the members of Haw-
thorne's immediate family and his clos-
est friends have steadily added what
they could. In Hawthorne and His
568
Books New and Old.
Circle * Mr. Julian Hawthorne appears
for the second time as his father's bio-
grapher. Hawthorne Abroad would
have been a little more accurate title
for the volume, since four fifths of it
has to do with the years of the Liv-
erpool consulship and foreign travel.
These, for the author of the present
volume, were the years between seven
and fourteen. The remembered obser-
vations of a youth of this age would of
course have scanty value ; but one need
not read far to learn that the boy's
memory has been abundantly rein-
forced by the man's study of his fa-
ther's Note-Books and other important
memorials of the period. It cannot,
then, be said that the book contains
much that is at once new and impor-
tant. The story of Hawthorne climb-
ing the nut tree at Lenox produces, for
example, a vivid sense of the fellowship
between the father and his children ;
but the same sense has already been
produced by the same anecdote in Mr.
Julian Hawthorne's Nathaniel Haw-
thorne and his Wife. There are such
occasional traces of carelessness as the
unhappy conversion of Bennoch into
Bannoch in the name beneath a good
man's portrait, and the grave omission
of an index. It is to be feared also
that Mr. Hawthorne is careless in say-
ing (page 52) that the manuscript of
The Scarlet Letter was destroyed by
James T. Fields's printers. There is,
on the contrary, excellent authority for
the statement that when Hawthorne, who
gave Mrs. Fields the manuscript of an-
other novel, was asked what had become
of The Scarlet Letter, he said, "Oh,
I put that up the chimney, and now I
wish I had n't." But these — in any
larger view of the book — are trivial
matters. Taking it for precisely what
it is, — the embellished remembrances
of the first fourteen years in the life of
a great writer's son, — it has its own
1 Hawthorne and His Circle. By JUIJAN
HAWTHORNE. New York and London : Har-
per & Brothers. 1903.
distinct value, together with an individ-
ual and positive interest. It confirms
for those who are familiar with existing
records many delightful impressions of
Hawthorne through an important period
of his life. To others it will clearly
bring these impressions for the first
time. The lapses from good taste are
infrequent, and the book as a whole is
eminently readable.
It needs no approaching centenary
to give a quality of timeliness to Gen-
eral Gordon's Reminiscences,2 for it
seems only yesterday that the illus-
trated papers were helping the country
at large to realize how solemnly the
state of Georgia mourned one of her
foremost soldiers and legislators. If
one's knowledge of later American
history had no deeper background than
that which General Gordon's own book
provides, it would still be possible to
understand his holding so secure a place
in the affections of the South; for in
his own portrait he cannot help draw-
ing a lovable man. Relate him, how-
ever, — merely through a list of the
great military events in which he bore
a part, — to the history of the cause
for which he fought, and the deeper
significance of his life stands clearly
forth. But it is less for any of the
momentous facts which he records than
for the temper of his record that his
volume is exceptional. It has become
the custom to ascribe every manifesta-
tion of a national spirit in a Confeder-
ate soldier to the Spanish war, and to
detect even in the color of khaki a
blending of blue and gray. The spirit
of General Gordon's Reminiscences
bears the marks of a slower growth.
It is not an acquired generosity toward
a foe which his pages reveal, but some-
thing of sympathy and understanding
which were a part of the man at the
very time when the martial virtues
might have been forgiven for blotting
2 Reminiscences of the Civil War. By Gen-
eral JOHN B. GORDON of the Confederate Army.
New York : Charles Scribner's Sons. 1903.
Books New and Old.
569
out all others. He displays a rarely
human quality in recognizing the same
weaknesses and strengths in the sol-
diers, high and low, of both armies.
For all the inherence of this unusual
temper, it may be doubted whether any
one could have written just such a book
twenty -five years ago. At that time
it might have done incalculable good.
Yet the day of its usefulness is' by no
means past. It is precisely through
such utterances of a common feeling
that the new South and North must
come to understand each other better.
It is not often that one who deserves
so full and satisfactory a biography as
The Life of Horace Binney * is left
so long with the biography unwritten.
Mr. Binney died in 1875, ninety -five
years old. The story of his active life
might have been written some years
before that time. He had long held
in Philadelphia the place, as it were,
of an historic figure. His triumphs at
the bar — • notably in the defense of
Stephen Girard's will — had won him
the highest distinction in his profes-
sion. He was not of the class which
established for the "Philadelphia law-
yer " that reputation for "smartness "
which, in its accepted sense, was not
wholly flattering. He represented ra-
ther the dignity, the scholarship, the
high tradition of the legal calling.
His Federalist dislike for Jefferson
found its utterance in a declaration
which also reveals a fine jealousy for
the law : " He has been the steady, un-
deviating, and but for his recent death
I would say insidious enemy of my
profession in its highest walks, the
bench, the judiciary." When the
Federal party disintegrated, Horace
Binney joined himself to no other, but,
1 The Life of Horace Binney. With Selec-
tions from his Letters. By CHARLES CHAUN-
CEY BINNEY. Philadelphia and London : J. B.
Lippincott Co. 1903.
2 Fanny Burney. By AUSTIN DOBSON. Eng-
lish Men of Letters Series. New York : The
Macmillan Co. 1903.
with a rare independence through a
long period of keen partisanship, held
himself free — like the Mugwump of
a later day — to vote as he might
choose. Sympathizing the more fre-
quently with the Republican party, af-
ter its formation, he could yet, at the
age of ninety - four, stand up against
the unworthy candidates of the local
"machine." As his biographer well
says : " The sight of an aged Federal-
ist in a Republican stronghold, braving
the chill of a wintry day to vote the
Democratic ticket for lack of a better,
was a striking lesson in non-partisan-
ship. " In the last analysis is not such
independence the peculiar attribute of
the gentleman, — the man whose stan-
dards are carefully chosen and do not
admit of compromise? The portrait
of Horace Binney which his grandson
has drawn in this volume is preemi-
nently the portrait of a gentleman. It
is drawn with the reserve and sense of
proportion which the subject demands.
It shows him in the various departments
of life, professional, domestic, religious,
intellectual, patriotic, which the well-
rounded men of the nineteenth century
impartially adorned ; and the total im-
pression is that of a type which our
civilization should be loath to leave be-
hind. M. A. DeW. H.
OF the three biographical studies 2 upon
Three Eng- which we are to venture some
llsh Writers. brief comment, Mr. Dobson's
Fanny Burney is, on all counts, the most
important. For one thing, his subject
lies toward the hither boundary of the
period of which he has so curious a
knowledge, and which he has been able to
invest with charm for many persons who
might, lacking his offices, have remained
Crabbe. By ALFRED AINGEB. English Men
of Letters Series. New York : The Macmillan
Co. 1903.
Thackeray. By CHARLES WHIBLEY. Modern
English Writers Series. New York : Dodd,
Mead & Co. 1903.
570
Books New and Old.
perfectly indifferent to it. Nobody is
more punctilious in erudition, or more
genially human in interpretation, than
Mr. Dobsoii. One comes to have a weak-
ness for his footnotes, and more than tol-
eration for his amiable foible for dates.
Indeed, his dates, like Milton's proper
names, take on a sort of talismanic value ;
in the end, one is not able to see how the
text could get on properly without them :
" On the 6th of July. 1786, the Public
Advertiser announced that — ' Miss Bur-
ney, daughter of Dr. Burney, is appoint-
ed Dresser to the Queen, in the room
of Mrs. Hoggadore, gone to Germany.'
The last three words were premature, for
further notifications, with much pleasing
and ingenious variation of Mrs. Hagger-
dorn's name, made it clear that the lady
in question only took leave of the Queen
on the 13th, and retired to her native
Mecklenburg on the 17th." The date of
Mrs. Haggerdorn's departure cannot be
said to be in itself of very great impor-
tance to the narrative ; but somehow the
little pedantry, if such it be, is rather en-
gaging than otherwise.
Mr. Dobson's manner as a biographer
is a model of literary breeding. He
never allows himself to be merely clever
or witty, though wit and cleverness are,
as we have abundant reason for knowing,
very much at his disposal. He takes it
for granted that his readers are inter-
ested in his subject, and not in himself.
The calm audacity of Mr. Birrell and the
brilliant effrontery of Mr. Chesterton are
equally remote from his method. He
chooses to throw a steady beam upon his
subject rather than a series of flashes.
Yet the good rule holds : by losing him-
self he comes to his own. It is his per-
sonality, after all, which gives his work
its effectiveness.
To write a new life of Fanny Burney
was a task of delicacy and importance.
Most persons who remember her at all
probably remember her by way of Ma-
caulay, if not directly from him. That
spirited but not altogether reliable Edin-
burgh essay stands a little between us
and a direct view of the object. We see
the young Fanny the least trifle more
charming and ingenuous than she was,
and watch with dismay her metamorpho-
sis into the prim and Johnsonian Madame
D'Arblay. We harbor, perhaps, an un-
warrantably violent grudge against the
well-meaning queen and her stupid Hag.
gerdorn. We feel some resentment to-
ward the altogether admirable M. D'Ar-
blay, and can hardly forgive his wife for
having been merely happy with him for
a quarter of a century. There is no de-
nying that Miss Burney 's work was done
before she reached middle life. So was
Miss Austen's ; yet who can forbear the
wish that she, too, might have had twenty-
five years more of life to throw away
upon some man as good as M. D'Arblay ?
Mr. Dobson employs frequent quota-
tions from the Diary in the course of his
narrative. What he has to say about it
specifically is very brief ; is to be found,
indeed, in his final paragraph. His main
contention is indisputable : that Miss
Burney's fame must rest upon the Diary
rather than upon the two novels which
made her a great figure in her own day.
" It has all the graphic picturesqueness,
all the dramatic interest, all the objec-
tive characterization, all the happy fac-
ulty of ' making her descriptions alive,'
— which constitute the charm of the best
passages in Evelina. But it has the
further advantage that it is true ; and
that it deals with real people." The
short of the matter is that your true diar-
ist has a very different method from that
of the novelist; he makes use of actua
events and persons as material for his
kind of creative writing. There is ne
doubt that Miss Burney found her proper
literary strength in the intimate lett
and the still more intimate journal;
while Miss Austen, whose letters serve
mainly to endear her to us as a worm
found it in fiction.
Mr. Ainger's Crabbe, in the sat
series, is another admirable example of
Books New and Old.
571
condensed critical biography. Crabbe's
life was of the quietest, and there have
been no new data of importance for the
present biographer to unearth. His
facts, almost without exception, have
been derived from the life written by
FitzGerald's friend, the younger Crabbe,
and prefixed to the first collected edition
of the poet's work, which was published
shortly after his death. That was a bi-
ography both filial and judicial ; it con-
tained, perhaps, a single conscious sup-
pression, — the word misrepresentation
could not be used. This is of so inter-
esting a nature that Mr. Ainger is justi-
fied in discussing it somewhat at length.
Crabbe wrote three or four poems which,
though powerful, are altogether unlike
the work which gave him his audience.
Mr. Ainger gives good reasons for his
surmise that their source was like that
of the Dream-Fugue and Kubla Khan.
The younger Crabbe admits that for
many years his father used opium, " and
to a constant but slightly increasing dose
of it," he says, " may be attributed his
long and generally healthy life." A
marginal note against this passage in
FitzGerald's copy suggests that the
opium " probably influenced his dreams,
for better or worse," and adds, " See also
the World of Dreams and Sir Eustace
Grey." Mr. Ainger draws an interest-
ing parallel between the imagery of Sir
Eustace Grey and that of certain pas-
sages in the De Quincey Confessions.
He might also have called attention to
the striking resemblance to that other
famous opium-eater in the sound and
savor of such passages as this : —
They placed me where those streamers play,
Those nimble beams of brilliant light ;
It would the stoutest heart dismay,
To see, to feel, that dreadful sight :
So swift, so pure, so cold, so bright,
They pierced my frame with icy wound ;
And all that half-year's polar night,
Those dancing streamers wrapp'd me round.
Of course this is a matter of inferi-
or moment. The substance of Crabbe's
work, his most characteristic poetry, was
in a vein altogether different from that
of any of his contemporaries ; though in
its inequality of workmanship it bore a
certain analogy to the poetry of Byron
and Wordsworth.
There are curious points of contrast in
Crabbe's life and work which would have
been fair game for Macaulay if the Edin-
burgh commission had fallen to him in-
stead of Jeffrey. (Macaulay admired
Crabbe, but mentions him only once in
the essays, and then merely by way of
throwing the villainous literary figure of
a luckless Mr. Robert Montgomery into
blacker relief.) There never was a bet-
ter chance for paradox. His verse is
monotonous and slipshod, his knowledge
of human types is varied and exact. He
judges women like an Ecclesiastes, and
describes them like a Torn Moore. He
is a sentimental pessimist ; an opium-eat-
ing realist ; a stern critic of clerical short-
comings, and an absentee pluralist : and
so on. The really important fact is that
with much of provinciality in the sub-
stance of his work, and much of imperfec-
tion in its form, he did somehow succeed
in producing poetry of permanent value.
The Parish Register is a record not only
of local events, but of universal experi-
ence ; the Borough and the Tales make
up a picture of universal society. Sir
Leslie Stephen's remark may fairly be
taken as the world's verdict thus far :
" With all its short- and long-comings,
Crabbe's better work leaves its mark on
the reader's mind and memory as only
the work of genius can."
Of Mr. Whibley's Thackeray one
must speak with a good deal of qualifi-
cation. It is not without vigor, it is not
without discernment, but it seems by this
or by that to lack roundness and sound-
ness. The critical biographer is probably
more open to error than others of the
critical trade ; for it is harder to be im-
partial in interpreting a man than in in-
terpreting a work of art. One has no
quarrel with Mr. Whibley for having de-
cided opinions about Thackeray, and for
572
The Contributors' Club.
stating them frankly. A critic will not
escape the charge of folly by being too
fearful in treading his ground. He must,
quite as much as a " creative " artist,
give himself away ; he must offer his
strength and his weakness for inspection.
If he is strong enough to command the
serious attention of his audience, whether
it agrees with him or not, he will have
exposed himself not altogether vainly ;
but the best criticism is not only frank,
it is true. Mr. Whibley does not quite
convince us that truth is ready to his
call.
His method is not simple enough ; he
is too clever by half. He says a good
many brilliant things, and not a few
witty ones. He has a pretty turn for
epigram. He " illuminates " his subject
with a capable arrangement of artificial
lights. The method has its value in
reaching toward a just estimate of some
writer so recent that the question of his
greatness or mere prominence can be
determined only by time. We have had
half a century for making up our minds
about Thackeray ; and we have come
to a pretty general understanding of his
limitations. But the trial is not finished
for Mr. Whibley : he here undertakes to
sum up the case against Thackeray, and
to recommend a verdict of guilty with
extenuating circumstances. Here are
some of the counts in the indictment :
(1) Thackeray is " a gentlemanly Phi-
listine, who esteems ton higher than
truth ; " (2) he is a sentimentalist,
" who unto the end of his career delight-
ed somewhat naively in the obvious emo-
tions ; " (3) " he is too often a man and
a brother ; he forgets the impartiality of
the artist, and goes about babbling with
his own puppets ; " (4) " his style lacks
distinction, though it gives a general im-
pression of gentlemanly ease." There
is nothing really novel in the substance
of these charges ; but they have hardly
been given heretofore such a hard glit-
tering surface. Every centuiy contrib-
utes a few great personalities to the
world's cherished store. Thackeray was
one of these ; and the breath of him is
not to be found in the ingenious mani-
kin which Mr. Whibley has constructed,
and which he neatly anatomizes for us.
The disjecta membra look much like
those of a Christian or an ordinary man.
Thackeray himself, — the big, worldly,
warm-hearted gentleman whom FitzGer-
ald and Tennyson and Carlyle loved, —
the great artist in the intimate style, —
does not appear.
THE CONTRIBUTORS' CLUB.
FIFTY years ago writers were literary
New Condi- men and women, those espe-
tionsln . .. . , ! . , r ,
Reading. daily interested in ideas and
their fitting garb of expression, and read-
ers were people of their own kind, in
whom the literary impulse reached to
the leaf of appreciation, though unable
to flower in creation; they, too, cared
for ideas, and found a joy in the suitable
garment of word and phrase. To-day,
the readers are the people, the masses,
and writers are in the main those who
supply them with what they want. Stu
pendous change! What does it mean?
Whither are we tending ?
As a result of the rapid development
of wealth and general but scanty edu-
cation, an immense reading public has
sprung into being. They are not the
least bit literary ; they want to read be-
cause they know how, have found it a
way of escape from being alone and dull ;
because they have the time to read and
the money to buy reading matter. As
The Contributors' Club.
573
to the kind of reading, they don't anx-
iously consult the experts on that point.
They read what appeals to them, — what
they can grasp without laborious effort,
what amuses, takes them out of the ruts
of daily life, or makes that life more in-
teresting. Men like to learn useful facts,
to hear what is going on in the world,
what has to do with their own and their
neighbors' business, to get in a nutshell,
in easy readable form, the results of sci-
entific research, travel, and exploration,
and to know something of popular inter-
est about famous people in various lines.
Some women like these things, too, but
more prefer to be ushered into a world
where faculties in themselves, to which
their prosy lives give little play, may
get a sort of exercise ; their hunger for
the romantic, the sentimental, and thrill-
ing feeds upon novels and romances
beyond number. And all the tribe of
young folks from school like much the
same sort of thing, only writ larger, —
both parents and children manifesting
the natural, untutored taste, untroubled
by literary verdicts or standards. 0
hard fate of a classic, to fall into such
hands as these ! No halo around the
head, no laurel wreath crowning the
brow, no medals of honor on the breast,
no silver locks of age, make the slight-
est difference to its judges, and it must
stand with the rabble and be put to the
test. Is the author's style difficult?
Then he is dismissed without a hearing.
Has it delicate beauties ? They go for
nothing ; they are not perceived. Has
he treasures of deep thought? These
things are too remote ; life is too hur-
ried. Can he tell a good story ? Then
he will pass ; but he must expect to find
himself with strange bedfellows in his
reader's approval, and often be forced
to take a seat below some scribbler at
whose name his gorge has ever risen.
Can he say shrewd, sensible things about
life, real life, and put them in terse, tell-
ing shape ? Then he will pass ; but here
again he will find himself in company
with solemn -faced venders of musty
platitudes, soul-wearying commonplaces,
without one redeeming touch of grace
in the utterance. For a discriminating
taste is the product of slow growth, of
hereditary influences, home environment
through many a year, reading and wise
teaching, and study long continued, —
except in the few cases of people born,
it would seem, with a natural literary
bent. Would that we could believe that
an essential soundness of taste dwells
among the masses, and that in due time,
having educated themselves out of their
crude preference for poor stuff, they will
emerge from their chrysalis a glorious
literary constituency ! But while the
light of civilization is destined to shine
farther and farther down the sides of
the pyramid of humanity, the base is
ever enlarging. While a few chosen
ones are emerging from the mass with
tastes purged, innumerable recruits are
swelling the density below, necessarily
children in taste and judgment. No,
we must face the fact that hereafter the
literary class will form only a small part
of the great reading public, the people
who demand the "popular." We are not
at the end, but at the beginning of the
era. The people have arrived, and they
have come to stay.
And now, turning from the realm of
demand to the realm of supply, another
set of facts is patent. Writers have
arisen to match the readers, — writers
who knew not Joseph. Their aim is
simple, — to make books to supply the
market demand. Their ears have been
trained to keenness to detect what there
is a call for, since great are the prizes to
him who best succeeds in pleasing. And
what they produce their publishers have
learned how to sell to the best advantage
of writer and seller. The advertisement
of books has become a business for the
expert. Book reviews seem to exist
mainly, not to guard the reader from
what is not good literature, but to help
the writer sell his book. The foremost
574
The Contributors' Club.
of principles is to convince that " every-
body is reading " a certain book. Our
non-literary reading class are eager to
read what the many like; for the one
word that describes their taste is popu-
lar.
Who knows but this arrival in the
field of a great untutored natural hun-
ger, and this eager pressure to supply it,
may eventually reinforce our literary life
with fresh blood, and usher in an Eliza-
bethan era of rich and vigorous life, a
creative period ?
But though literature may be in the
end the gainer, time and the world-
forces, the great processes of evolution,
will settle that. For us as individuals,
here and now, hasty selection and cheap
admiration are the great overhanging
dangers to be faced and fought. We
must be on the defensive, in a condition
of things fraught with danger to reading
and writing habits.
Let the lovers of good reading dare
to go counter to the crowd; let them
support one another in the resolve to
be unfashionable, to plead ignorance of
much that is being talked of. In read-
ing, as in material possessions, there is
a wholesome poverty that develops char-
acter, — the reading of the very best that
man has written, with reflection there-
upon ; and there is an enervating wealth,
— hurried, unthinking, indiscriminate
reading, the mere tickling of the intel-
lectual palate, that becomes a matter of
habit and a craving.
THERE is a certain clock-tick that is
Clock-Ticks, as religious as a church bell,
— more religious than some church bells.
It goes with a big, sunny room, where it
is always afternoon, with a rag carpet on
the floor, and chairs set carefully against
the wall. The clock stands high on a
shelf, — at the end of the long mantel
across the chimney, — and there it ticks
away the sleepy time. . . . Tock-tock,
tock-tock, comfortable and slow. No
need for hurry. The family are all away.
You are alone in the house, — except for
the gray cat, purring by the stove, — alone
in the world, — alone in time. . . . Tock-
tock, tock-tock, slow and sure. The sun
pours in at the windows and bars the
carpet. It shifts, silently as the still-
ness. And the slow, swinging tocks lift
your soul out of space, out of time, and
lay it gently back upon the infinite.
Tock-tock. It soothes you like a dream
— and a promise. Home-home, rest-rest,
home-home. . . . Time was not made to
do things in, but for being. Is there
anything you could do, by chance, that
would amount to as much as this slow,
sleepy afternoon, with its touch on the
soul and its long, unnumbered tocks ?
They hold one deep through the years
and come creeping back, at unawares.
Above the roar of the street and the toss
of the wind — listen, you can hear them
now. . . . The house sinks silent about
you, and the long afternoon holds you.
You did not guess how deep it was, nor
how true. The place was not home,
— some farmhouse, perhaps, where you
passed the days and waited for life. And
now you understand that you have never
lived, except in a few still hours, — care-
less, full-fraught moments lifted out of the
days and nights and set forever in a sunny
place.
It is a very common room where the
old clock ticks. Four chairs and a sofa
and table. No pillows, no rugs, and no
hangings to smother the sound ; and no
pictures and bricabrac to shatter it to
bits. Have you heard, perhaps, a modern
French clock — Clackety-clack, clackety-
click, Push-push-push ? There are al-
ways ornaments on the shelf where it
stands, and ornaments on the table, and
on the floor. It has gilt on its face and
jewels on its hands, and it lives very fast,
— sixty minutes to the hour and twenty-
four hours to the day, — hurried hours,
breathless minutes, crammed to the brim
with excitement. . . . Clackety-clack,
clackety-click, Push - push - push, Quick-
quick-quick ! When I find one in the
chamber where I am to sleep, I always
The Contributors' Club.
575
look carefully about for some safe hole
in which to bestow it. If no other offers,
my traveling-bag will at least muffle its
strenuous voice till the coming of the
morn. But alas, if the clock be small
and round and easily hidden from sight
in stray corners of the bag ! Twice
have I borne away the timepiece offered
for my delectation. Twice has it fallen
to my lot to explain to an energetic
hostess my peculiar conduct. Now I al-
ways put it under the mattress. If I go
away and forget it, I am only regarded
as a little crazy, which is surely better
than rolling up a reputation for klepto-
mania.
Not till all the clocks of modern times
are drowned in the depths of the sea
shall we recover peace and serenity.
Clackety-clack, on a thousand walls they
beat, — filled with alarms and strikes
and whirs, breaking your sleep snap in
twain, with dreams half done. In our
ears they click, day and night. On our
souls they dance ; and their tune is the
tune of death.
I swing back into the past. I catch
its rhythm, slow and sure. There is no
hurry but the hurry of the heart that
runs to meet its own, and no power to
compel us but the power of love.
RECENT discussion on the ancient
Quotation subject of quotation seems
and Allu- to me a little reckless, as
likely to make people lose
sight of the fact that the world is still
in danger of pedantry even in these
quick times. In certain quarters the
old tradition lingers that quotations or
bookish allusions will give the look of
literature to any printed page. Per-
haps it is on the chance that scraps
from the works of better writers may
somehow tide the reader over when the
man's own thought gives out. Some-
times it is to show that he is a man of
varied reading, each quotation serving
as an apothecary's diploma that none
may deny that he has graduated from
the book. At all events, it often has
the air of deliberation, as if the quota-
tion had not come to the man, but the
man had gone to the quotation. In
the old days there were some involun-
tary quoters, to wit, Burton, in the
Anatomy, who could not help bubbling
over with queer, outlandish sayings
that he had picked up just for fun.
But the typical quoter was a university
man, who, before he wrote a paragraph,
went on a pot-hunt among the Latin
poets in order that he might cite tri-
umphantly twenty-four lines of Virgil-
ian metaphor beginning, "Not other-
wise a Nubian lion with his tawny
mane. " They multiplied like Austra-
lian rabbits, and it was not till the
middle of the last century that English
literature began to drive them out.
Nowadays we are comparatively safe
from them, and no writer with any
natural spring of mind ekes out his
thought with other people's phrases.
The rule of to-day is neither to shun
nor to seek.
But here and there the tawdry old
precedent is still followed, and only
the other day we read in a newspaper
article, "If a thing is right, it ought
to be done, said Cobden, " recalling the
old gibe that water was wet on the au-
thority of Beza. We have noted the
same bit of Latin nine times in one
newspaper, and each time could see the
paragraph writhing to get it in. The
Vicar of Wakefield's friend, with his
two stock phrases from the classics,
seems almost a burlesque, but he was
not, and he is not even to-day. There
are men now living who will use a
French word when there is an exact
English equivalent, and then add the
equivalent in parenthesis. There is a
per contra man, and an ad hoc man,
and a wretch who will quote you Pascal
for the sentiment that truth will pre-
vail. "Corrupt politics are not good
politics," says Burke, and "Life is a
struggle, " says Seneca, and " Dare to
do right," says Cobden, and "Law is
the bulwark of liberty," as the Lord
576
The Contributors' Club.
Chief Justice of England once re-
marked. The hardened quoter cares
only for the name, and when pressed
for time, will often forge it. That
is why you see so many dull sayings
with great names attached, — poverty-
stricken minds displaying a bogus in-
dorsement from the well-to-do. But
many, of course, are genuine, and toil-
somely gathered for use on the day of
literary deficit, when the style needs
a ringlet from Longfellow, or a boost
from Samuel Johnson, or an orotund
boom from Burke. Often the sentence
quoted is one of the great man's worst.
When young and helpless I once
fell in with a terrible family that lived
by the bad old rule. They made it a
daily duty to study up things to quote,
and every Sunday morning at break-
fast each would recite a passage mem-
orized during the week. The steam
from the coffee vanished into literary
air, and the muffins, when we had at-
tained them, seemed to be bound in
calf. They said it helped to fix the
thing in mind, and though they had no
present use for it, they thought some-
thing might happen to make it apropos.
And they saw to it that something did
happen, and out it came to the end.
They lived in a sort of vicious watch-
fulness. On wet days they conned over
their rain verse in order to whip out a
stanza in the midst of weather talk,
and if they drove through the country
they saw nothing for constantly mum-
bling what Wordsworth would have
said. They would graciously say the
passage was doubtless familiar, but re-
lentlessly repeat every word. Large
blocks of poetry would suddenly fall
athwart the conversation, no one knew
whence, while with bowed head the
startled Philistine would wait for the
seizure to pass. So busy were they
remembering, they never had time to
think, and life was a book of clippings,
and nature a table of contents, and
friendship their opportunity, till the
friend found means to escape. There
was nothing in that family that you
could not somewhere read, and the peo-
ple who once knew them now either
visit the libraries or turn to an album
of song. To be sure it was somewhat
unusual, but it shows there is life in
the old temptation, and what havoc
it still may work. And the belief is
by no means unusual that the literary
quality is a thing to be pitchforked in,
that the fruit of reading is its samples,
that the proof of a mind's adventures
is a list of the things that it ate.
Hence many a thought goes zigzag to
take in a well-authored phrase, and
many a man stops thinking for the
sake of a learned look ; and that which
would be delightful if it came of its
own accord gives the painful impres-
sion of being brought in with a scuffle
to serve on the witness stand.
THE
ATLANTIC MONTHLY:
#riaga$ine of Literature^ ^>ctence, art, ana
VOL. XCIIL — MA Y, 1904. — No. DLIX.
LETTERS OF JOHN RUSKIN.1
1855-1857.
IN October, 1855, I was on the way
to Europe. One of my fellow passengers
was Mr. James Jackson Jarves of Boston,
then well known as a writer upon art and
as the owner of a highly interesting col-
lection of pictures made by him during
a residence of several years in Italy. He
was acquainted with Mr. Raskin, and
kindly offered me a letter of introduction
to him. I declined a letter that should
make any personal claim, but gratefully
accepted a note asking Mr. Ruskin to
allow me at his convenience the privilege
of seeing the pictures and drawings by
Turner which might be open to inspection
on his walls. On my arrival in London
I inclosed this note to Mr. Ruskin, and
received the following gracious reply : —
DENMARK HILL, 31 October, 1855.
MY DEAR SIB, — On Friday, Mon-
day or Tuesday next, I should be most
happy to see you at any hour after one,
and before four. I do not know what
work I may have to do, and I may not
be able to have more than a little chat.
But the pictures should be at your com-
mand.
Very truly yours,
J. RUSKIN.
CHARLES ELIOT NORTON, Esq.
When, in accordance with this note, I
went to Denmark Hill, he received me
with unaffected kindliness, as if eager
to give pleasure, took me through din-
ing-room and drawing-room, and up-
stairs into his workroom, to show me
his pictures, talking about them with
lively animation, and when I thanked
him in taking my leave, he assured me
that I should be welcome to repeat my
visit. He had not given to me (I doubt
if he gave it to any one) any indication of
his sense of " the infinite waste of time,"
noted in his Praeterita, " in saying the
same things over and over to the people
who came to see our Turners."
He was at this time thirty-six years old.
The second volume of Modern Painters
had been published ten years before ;
he had meanwhile published the Seven
Lamps of Architecture and the Stones of
Venice, and he was busy this year in
writing the third and fourth volumes of
Modern Painters. His abundant light-
brown hair, his blue eyes, and his fresh
complexion gave him a young look for
his age ; he was a little above middle
height, his figure was slight, his move-
ments were quick and alert, and his whole
air and manner had a definite and attrac-
tive individuality. There was nothing
in him of the common English reserve
and stiffness, and no self-consciousness
or sign of consideration of himself as a
man of distinction, but rather, on the
contrary, a seeming self-forgetfulness
and an almost feminine sensitiveness
and readiness of sympathy. His fea-
tures were irregular, but the lack of
beauty in his countenance was made up
1 Copyright, 1904, by CHARLES ELIOT NORTON.
578
Letters of John Raskin.
for by the kindness of his look, and the
expressiveness of his full and mobile lips.
I did not expect to see Mr. Ruskin
again, but it happened on a beautiful
morning in the next July that we met
in the cabin of the steamer going down
the Lake of Geneva from Vevay to Ge-
neva. Ruskin was there, reading aloud,
but in a low tone, to his mother, one of.
Marmontel's tales. My mother and two
sisters were with me. He glanced at
us, but I saw that he did not recognize
me. In a pause of his reading I ven-
tured to recall myself to his memory.
He begged my pardon pleasantly for
having failed to recognize me, and then
we fell into conversation which lasted
till we reached Geneva. When we part-
ed at the quay it was with a promise
that I would come in the evening to see
him and his parents. Ruskin has re-
corded this meeting in Praeterita, with
a friendly exaggeration which is thor-
oughly characteristic of his generous dis-
position to exalt the merits of his friends,
and of his instinctive habit, manifest as
well in personal relations as in his writ-
ings, of magnifying the interest, the im-
portance, or the charm of whatever might
for the moment engage his attention and
regard.1
In the evening I carried with me a
volume of the poems of Lowell, concern-
ing whom we had spoken, and I left the
volume with him. He was going on the
next day to Chamouni. In the morn-
ing I received the following note from
him : —
[GENEVA, 18 July, 1856.]
I am truly obliged to you for showing
me this book. Lowell must be a noble
fellow. The Fable for Critics in animal
spirit and fervor is almost beyond any-
thing I know, and it is very interesting
to see, in the rest, the stern seriousness
1 Prceterita, iii. ch. 2.
2 This -was the Hotel du Hont Blanc of
which Ruskin has written: — "to
me, cer-
of a man so little soured — so fresh and
young at heart.
I hope you have enjoyed yourselves.
Can you send me a line to Union Hotel,
Chamouni, to say you have ?
Pray come to see me if you can be-
fore leaving England.
Truly yours,
J. RUSKIN.
Two or three days later we met again,
at the little inn 2 at St. Martin. He has
told of our early morning walk.8 The
friendship had begun which was to last
till the end of life.
In the autumn, my mother and sis-
ters having returned to America, I was
in London, staying at Fenton's Hotel in
St. James's Street, much out of health.
I had promised to let Ruskin know of
my coming to London, and on hearing
of it, he at once came to see me, and
while I remained there, few days passed
in which he did not send me a note like
the following, or come to my parlor, laden
with books and drawings for my amuse-
ment, or carry me off in his brougham
for an hour or two at Denmark Hill.
Saturday Morning [October, 1856].
DEAR MB. NORTON, — In case I
don't find you to-day (and I can't be at
home this afternoon), could you dine
with us to-morrow at ^ past four — or if
not able to do that, come in at any hour
you like to tea in the evening ?
Yours affectionately,
J. RUSKIN.
Of course you will only find my fa-
ther and mother and me, and perhaps
an old family friend.
DENMARK HILL [October, 1856].
DEAR NORTON, — Most unwillingly I
am forced — I '11 tell you how when we
meet — to give up my walk this after-
tainly, of all my inn homes, the most eventful,
pathetic, and sacred." Prceterita, ii. ch. 11.
3 Praeterita, iii. ch. 3.
Letters of John Ruskin.
579
noon, but I '11 come and take tea with
you at eight if I may.
Ever affectionately yours,
J. R.
Wednesday, 28th [October, 1856].
DEAR NORTON, — I do hope you have
faith enough in me to understand how
much I am vexed at not being able to
come and see you. Of course I could
run upstairs and down again at Fenton's
sometimes, but what would be the use of
that. Could you come out to see me to-
morrow, Thursday, about ^ past two ;
if not, I can come into town on Friday,
about two.
Please, if you can't come to-morrow,
send me a line to say if you can be at
home on Friday.
Yours affectionately,
J. RUSKIN.
Denmark Hill is on the Surrey side of
the Thames, in the Camberwell district
of London, and in those days had a plea-
sant suburban character. The house in
which Ruskin lived with his father and
mother stood not far from the top of the
hill, walled from the street, and set back
in grounds of its own of some six or
seven acres, with space enough for old
trees and large gardens, and with a mea-
dow, rather than lawn, behind it, over
which, so open was the region then, lay
a pleasant vista toward the east. There
was a lodge at the gate, from which a
short avenue led to the house. The house
itself was of brick, ample, solid, of no
architectural pretensions, but not with-
out a modest suburban and somewhat
heavy dignity of aspect which gave the
assurance of a home of comfort and of
tranquil ease. " The house itself," says
Mr. Ruskin, " had no specialty, either of
comfort or inconvenience, to endear it ;
the breakfast-room, opening on the lawn
and the farther field, was extremely
pretty when its walls were mostly cov-
ered with lakes by Turner and doves by
William Hunt ; the dining and drawing-
rooms were spacious enough for our
grandest receptions . . . and had deco-
ration enough in our Northcote portraits,
Turner's Slave-ship and, in later years,
his Rialto, with our John Lewis, two
Copley Fieldings, and every now and
then a new Turner drawing." l
Ruskin's father and mother received
me at Denmark Hill, as their son's new
acquaintance, with unquestioning kind-
ness. Of both of them Ruskin has writ-
ten much in delightful pages of Fors and
of Praeterita.
His father was now a man of seventy
years of age, looking perhaps younger
than his years, somewhat reserved in
manner, of rugged Scotch features, but
of refined and pleasant expression. His
mother, some years older, was plainly
the ruling influence in their domestic life.
She was a personage who seemed rather
a contemporary of Miss Austen's charac-
ters than of the actual generation. Her
air was that of one accustomed to defer-
ence from those about her. Her eyes
were keen, and her speech decisive. She
was one of those English matrons, now
become rare, of an individuality indepen-
dent of changes in fashion and conven-
tion, not bending to others, but expecting
others to accept her ways and adapt them-
selves to them. Her image, as I recall it,
was that of a vigorous old lady of some-
what commanding aspect, whose dress
betokened her feminine taste for soft-
colored silks, for abundance of old lace,
and for the heavy ornaments of English
jewelry. The manners toward her of her
husband and son were always deferential,
though her son ventured occasionally to
be playful with her with a lively humor
which occasionally ruffled her, but which,
on the whole, she did not dislike. Her
regard for him seemed to be still that
of a watchful mother for a child who,
though he has escaped her control in mat-
ters outside of an immediate personal re-
lation, has not yet reached the years of
discretion. There was less intimacy of
1 Praterita, ii. ch. 8.
580
Letters of John Huskin.
sympathy between them than between
Ruskin and his father. But even with
his father, sympathies were limited on
both sides, not so much by incompatibili-
ties of taste and judgment, for in many
respects these were much alike in both,
as by the peculiar manner in which Rus-
kin had been brought up and been taught
to regard his parents, and by the separa-
tion wrought by the position in the world
which his genius had created for him.
The feeling of his parents for him was a
compound of pride with affection, and
his feeling for them was one in which
the sense of duty, reverence, and obedi-
ence was perhaps a larger element than
natural affection.
In describing his early years, he
says : l " I had nothing to love. My
parents were — in a sort — visible pow-
ers of nature to me, no more loved than
the sun and the moon. ... I had no
companions to quarrel with, neither ; no-
body to assist, and nobody to thank. . . .
I had nothing to endure. . . . Lastly,
and chief of evils, my judgment of right
and wrong and powers of independent
action were left entirely undeveloped ;
because the bridle and blinkers were
never taken off me. . . . The ceaseless
authority exercised over my youth left
me, when cast out at last into the world,
unable for some time to do more than
drift with its vortices."
The results of these conditions were
all the more disastrous because of the
exceptional sensitiveness of his nature,
his extreme susceptibility to immediate
impressions, the affectionateness and gen-
erosity of his disposition, and the peculiar
constitution of his genius. No child ever
needed more a discipline which should
develop his power of self-control, and no
child ever was more trained to depend
on external authority. This authority he
was taught to obey without question, but
the lesson of self-restraint was omitted.
In a letter to Rossetti written not long
1 Prceterita, i. ch. 2.
before this time, he said of himself, " I
am exceedingly fond of making peo-
ple happy," and of this I soon had full
experience. He was unwearied in his
kindnesses and generosities. But in the
same letter he said : " It is a very great,
in the long-run the greatest, misfortune
of my life that, on the whole, my rela-
tions, cousins and so forth, are persons
with whom I can have no sympathy, and
that circumstances have always somehow
or another kept me out of the way of
people of whom I could have made
friends. So that I have no friendships
and no loves." 2 The barrenness of his
life in this respect, and the greatness of
the misfortune to him, soon became plain
to me. Of all men he needed friends,
and in their place he had admirers and
dependents. The manner of his educa-
tion, his genius, and his early acquired
celebrity had all contributed to prevent
him in his youth from associating on
even terms with his fellows, while the
circumstances and occupations of his life
since leaving Oxford had tended to limit
his intercourse with the world. He had
little knowledge of men, little keenness
of discernment of character, and little
practical acquaintance with affairs. Ex-
perience had not taught him the lesson,
which it compels the common run of
men to learn, of reconciling into a gen-
eral if imperfect harmony the conflicting
traits of his own disposition ; and he con-
sequently often was, and still oftener
seemed, inconsistent in conduct and in
conviction. From his earliest childhood
he had been unhappily trained to self-
occupation and self-interest, and with a
nature of extreme generosity and capa-
ble of self-forgetful sacrifice, the gratifi-
cation of his generous impulses became
often a form of self-indulgence.
It was, of course, only gradually and
slowly that I came to a knowledge of the
peculiar influences by which his life had
been shaped and his character formed.
2 Buskin: Bossetti : PreBaphaelitism. By
W. M. ROSSETTI. London, 1899. Pp. 71, 72.
Letters of John Huskin.
581
When I first knew him, he had a most
engaging personality. He was in the
very heyday of distinction. But his repu-
tation sat lightly on him ; his manners
were marked by absence of all preten-
sion, and by a sweet gentleness and ex-
ceptional consideration for the feelings
of others. The tone of dogmatism and
of arbitrary assertion too often manifest
in his writing was entirely absent from
his talk. In spite of all that he had gone
through of suffering, in spite of the bur-
den of his thought, and the weight of his
renown, he had often an almost boyish
gayety of spirit and liveliness of humor,
and always a quick interest in whatever
might be the subject of the moment.
He never quarreled with a difference of
opinion, and was apt to attribute only too
much value to a judgment that did not
coincide with his own. I have not a
memory of these days in which I recall
him except as one of the pleasantest,
gentlest, kindest, and most interesting of
men. He seemed to me cheerful rather
than happy. The deepest currents of his
life ran out of sight, but it was plain that
they did not run calmly, and their trou-
bled course became manifest now and
then in extravagances of action and para-
doxes of opinion.
Ruskin's father, as one saw him at his
own house, had not much of the air of a
man of business, but rather that of a cul-
tivated English gentleman, with an ex-
cellent acquaintance with the masters of
English literature and a genuine fond-
ness for them, and with unusual interest
and taste in matters pertaining to the
arts. He was an agreeable host, unaffect-
ed and considerate in manner, and well
able to bear his part in good talk. The
intimate friend of the house, and the one
most often found at the modest dinners,
to which three or four guests might be
invited, was Mr. W. H. Harrison, of
whom Ruskin has given a genial sketch in
an autobiographical reminiscence called
My First Editor.1 He had, indeed, good
reason for gratitude to this mild, good-
humored, secondary man of letters, ed-
itor of Friendship's Offering and the like,
and for many years registrar of the Lit-
erary Fund. Mr. Harrison had practical
sense and kindly discretion, he was skilled
in the technical elements of literature,
and he devoted unwearied pains to the
revision of his friend's hasty literary
work. " Not a book of mine for good
thirty years," wrote Ruskin, "but went
every word of it under his careful eyes
twice over." " The friendship between
Mr. Harrison, my father, and mother and
me attained almost the character of a
family relationship which remained faith-
ful and loving, more and more conducive
to every sort of happiness among us, to
the day of my father's death."
One evening at dinner, when the cloth
was drawn, Mr. Ruskin, senior, in special
honor of the occasion, had set before him
a decanter of sherry from the cask which
had been on board the Victory for Nel-
son's use in the last months of his life.
Mr. Ruskin was always proud of his
sherry, but this wine, of supreme excel-
lence in itself, not only pleased his fine
palate, but touched his romantic fancy.
It had been ripened on a fateful voyage,
it had rocked to the thunder of the guns
of Trafalgar, a glass of it might have
moistened Nelson's dying lips. The old
wine-merchant's appreciation of the as-
sociations which it evoked was a pleasant
exhibition of his suppressed poetic sensi-
bilities. The talk suggested by the wine
ran back to the early years of the cen-
tury, and the two elder men recalled
some of the incidents of the time when
they were youths beginning their way in
London, and especially of its literary in-
terests. Both of them had been mem-
bers of the scanty audience which had
gathered in the winter of 1811-12 in
a big ugly room, in a court off Fleet
Street, to listen to Coleridge's lectures
on Shakespeare and Milton. Mr. J. P.
Collier's reports of these lectures had just
1 To be found in the first volume of On the
Old Road.
582
Letters of John Ruskin.
been published, and Mr. Harrison was
able to set right from memory Collier's
account of Coleridge's classification of
readers.1
They both had been greatly interested
in the lectures, and had found in them
a general intellectual stimulus of a high
order, as well as specific criticisms which
they had learned to value as years went
on. Raskin thought Coleridge had been
vastly overrated as a philosopher, and
that his best poems were feverish. An-
other topic of the after-dinner talk was
Emerson's English Traits, which was
then a new book. All praised it. " How
did he come to find out so much about
us?" said the elder Mr. Ruskin, "es-
pecially as regards matters on which
we keep quiet and reserved among our-
selves." That was the voice of the gen-
eration to which Mr. Ruskin belonged.
His son, speaking for himself and for
his generation, would hardly have used
the like terms. One of the great changes
in England during the nineteenth cen-
tury was the breaking down of many of
the old style walls within which the shy
Englishman was wont to entrench him-
self, and no English writer ever opened
himself and his life to the public with
more complete and indiscreet unreserve
than Ruskin. His father would have
been horrified could he in the days of
which I am writing have foreseen the
revelations of Fors and Prseterita. They
do, indeed, form a contrast which is both
humorous and pathetic to the close re-
serves of Denmark Hill, and to the strict
Anglican conventions, at their best so
pleasant and so worthy of respect, in ac-
1 Mr. Harrison was good enough to write down
for me the next day what he had told at dinner,
and since Collier's is the only known report of
this course of lectures, Mr. Harrison's correc-
tion of it has perhaps interest enough to justify
its preservation. "Coleridge gave four types
of readers, one of which I have forgotten : —
1st, Those whose minds are like an hour-glass ;
what they read runs in and runs out like the
sand and not a grain is retained. 2nd, Those
who are like sponges, which suck up everything
cordance to which life there was con-
ducted.
The difference in age between Ruskin
and myself (I was nine years the young-
er), no less than other greater differences
between us, which might well have pre-
vented our intercourse from becoming
anything more than a passing acquain-
tance, seemed not to present themselves
to Ruskin's mind. His kindness had its
roots in the essential sweetness of his
nature. Everything in life had conspired
to spoil him. He was often willful and
wayward and extravagant, but the better
elements of his being prevailed over
those which, to his harm, were to gain
power when he was released from the
controlling influence of his father's good
sense and his mother's authority. The
extraordinary keenness of his perceptions
of external things, the vivacity of his
intelligence, the ardor of his tempera-
ment, the immense variety of his interests
and occupations, and the restless energy
and industry with which he pursued
them, made him one of the most inter-
esting of men. And combined as they
were with deep poetic and deeper moral
sentiment, as well as with a native desire
to give pleasure, they gave to intercourse
with him a charm which increased as ac-
quaintance grew into affectionate friend-
ship. His mind was, indeed, at this
time in a state of ferment. He was still
mainly busy with those topics of art and
nature to which his writings had hitherto
been devoted. But his work in that
field had led him into other regions of
inquiry, which stretched wide and dark
before him, through which no clear
and give it out again in much the same state,
hut a little dirtied. 3rd," [Forgotten. Accord-
ing to Collier, " Strain hags who retain merely
the dregs."] " 4th, The readers who are like
the slaves in the mines of Golconda, they cast
aside the dirt and dross, and preserve only the
jewels." Collier's plainly incorrect report of
this fourth class is as follows: "Mogul dia-
monds, equally rare and valuable, who profit
hy what they read, and enable others to profit
by it also."
Letters of John Ruskin.
583
paths were visible, and into which he
was entering not without hope of opening
a way. Henceforth his chief mission was
tHat, not of the guide in matters of art,
but of the social reformer. And it was
at the moment — a moment of perplexity
and trouble — when he was becoming
conscious of the new direction to be given
to his life that our acquaintance began.
When, after a month in which our re-
lations grew constantly more familiar,
and in our long talks he had instructed
me in many things, I left England to
spend the winter of 1856-57 in Rome, I
felt myself already under a lifelong debt
of gratitude to him. His first letter to
me after my departure was the follow-
ing:—
[LONDON] 28th December, 1856.
DEAR NORTON, — Railways are good
for letters, assuredly ; it seems very won-
derful, and is very pleasant, to hear from
you in Rome only a week ago ; for I got
your letter yesterday, and should have
had it the day before, but that I was
staying in town for a few days. And I
hope the enjoyment of that damp and
discordant city ; and that desolate and
diseaseful Campagna, of which your let-
ter assures me, may be received as a
proof of your own improved health, and
brightness of heart and imagination.
I think, perhaps, I abuse Rome more
because it is as sour grapes to me. When
I was there l I was a sickly and very ig-
norant youth ; and I should be very glad,
now, if I could revisit what I passed in
weariness or contempt ; and I do envy
you (sitting as I am just now in the
Great Western hotel at Paddington, look-
ing out upon a large number of panes
of gray glass, some iron spikes, and a
brick wall) that walk in sight of Sabine
hills. Still, reasoning with myself in the
severest way, and checking whatever
malice against the things I have injured,
1 He was there in bad health in the winter of
1840-41. See Prceterita, ii. ch. 2, for the ac-
count of his stay there.
or envy of you, there may be in the feel-
ings with which I now think of Rome,
these appear to me incontrovertible and
accurate conclusions, — that the streets
are damp and mouldy where they are not
burning ; that the modern architecture
is fit only to put on a Twelfth cake in
sugar (e. g. the churches at the Quattro
Fontane) ; that the old architecture con-
sists chiefly of heaps of tufo and bricks ;
that the Tiber is muddy ; that the Foun-
tains are Fantastic ; that the Castle of
St. Angelo is too round ; that the Capitol
is too square ; that St. Peter's is too big ;
that all the other churches are too little ;
that the Jews' quarter is uncomfortable ;
that the English quarter is un pictur-
esque ; that Michael Angelo's Moses is
a monster ; that his Last Judgment is a
mistake ; that Raphael's Transfiguration
is a failure ; that the Apollo Belvidere
is a public nuisance ; that the bills are
high ; the malaria strong ; the dissipation
shameful ; the bad company numerous ;
the Sirocco depressing ; the Tramontana
chilling ; the Levante parching ; the Po-
nente pelting ; the ground unsafe ; the
politics perilous, and the religion perni-
cious. I do think, that in all candour
and reflective charity, I may assert this
much.
Still, I can quite understand how, com-
ing from a fresh, pure and very ugly
country like America, there may be a
kind of thirst upon you for ruins and
shadows which nothing can easily as-
suage ; that after the scraped cleanliness
and business and fussiness of it (Amer-
ica), mildew and mould may be meat and
drink to you, and languor the best sort
of life, and weeds a bewitchment (I
mean the unnatural sort of weed that
only grows on old bricks and mortar and
out of cracks in mosaic ; all the Cam-
pagna used to look to me as if its grass
were grown over a floor) ; and the very
sense of despair which there is about
Rome must be helpful and balmy, after
the over-hopefulness and getting-on-ness
of America ; and the very sense that no-
584
Letters of John Ruskin.
body about you is taking account of any-
thing, but that all is going on into an
unspelt, unsummed, undistinguished heap
of helplessness, must be a relief to you,
coming out of that atmosphere of Calcu-
lation. I can't otherwise account for
your staying at Rome.
You may wonder at my impertinence
in calling America an ugly country. But
I have just been seeing a number of
landscapes by an American painter of
some repute ; and the ugliness of them
is Wonderful. I see that they are true
studies, and that the ugliness of the
country must be Unfathomable. And a
young American lady has been drawing
under my directions in Wales this sum-
mer, and when she came back I was en-
tirely silenced and paralyzed by the sense
of a sort of helplessness in her that I
could n't get at ; an entire want of per-
ception of what an English painter would
mean by beauty or interest in a subject ;
her eyes had been so accustomed to ugli-
ness that she caught at it wherever she
could find it, and in the midst of beauti-
ful stony cottages and rugged rocks and
wild foliage, would take this kind of
thing l for her main subject ; or, if she
had to draw a mountain pass, she would
select this turn in the road,2 just where
the liberally-minded proprietor had re-
cently mended it and put a new planta-
tion on the hill opposite.
In her, the contrary instinct of deliv-
erance is not yet awake, and I don't
know how to awake it. In you, it is in
its fullest energy, and so you like weeds,
and the old, tumbled-to-pieces things at
Rome. . . .
I shall be writing again soon, as I
shall have to tell you either the positive
or negative result of some correspon-
dence which the Trustees of the National
Gallery have done me the honour to
open with me (of their own accord)
1 Ruskin here inserts a playful sketch of a
wooden tenement house.
'2 This sentence is also illustrated by a whim-
sical drawing of the pass and the road.
which, for the present, has arrived at a
turn in the Circumlocution road, much
resembling in its promising aspect that
delineated above, — but which may
nevertheless lead to something, and
whether it does or not, I accept with too
much pleasure the friendship you give
me, not to tell you what is uppermost in
my own mind and plans at the moment,
even though it should come to nothing
(and lest it should, as is too probable,
don't speak of it to any one). Meantime
I am writing some notes on the Turner
pictures already exhibited, of which I
shall carefully keep a copy for you ; I
think they will amuse you, and I have
got a copy of the first notes on the Acad-
emy, which you asked me for, and which
I duly looked for, but could n't find to
my much surprise ; the copy I have got
is second-hand. You have n't, of course,
read Mrs. Browning's Aurora Leigh, or
you would have spoken in your letter of
nothing else. I only speak of it at the
end of my letter, not to allow myself
time to tell you anything about it except
to get it ; and to get it while you are
still in Italy.
This will not reach you in time for
the New Year, but it will, I hope, be-
fore Twelfth day ; not too late to wish
you all happiness and good leading by
kindliest stars, in the year that is open-
ing. My Father and Mother send their
sincerest regards to you, and do not
cease to congratulate me on having gained
such a friend. Believe me,
Affectionately yours,
J. RUSKIN.
You never saw your vignette 8 framed ;
it looks lovely.
After the winter in Rome I went to
Venice, and there received the following
letter : —
3 Turner's water-color drawing of Scott's
house, Castle Street, Edinburgh.
Letters of John Huskin.
585
[Undated, but May, 1857.]
DEAR NORTON, * — Very good it is
of you to write to me again ; and to
think of me before the snowy mountains,
in spite of my unsympathizing answer to
your first letter, and my no answer to
your second ; which, nevertheless, I was
grateful for. And so you are going to
Venice, and this letter will, I hope, be
read by you by the little square sliding
pane of the gondola window. For I hope
you hold to the true Gondola, with Black
Felze, eschewing all French and Eng-
lish substitutions of pleasure-boat and
awning. I have no doubt, one day, that
the gondolas will be white instead of
black, at the rate they carry on their
reforms at Venice.
I went through so much hard-dry,
mechanical toil there, that I quite lost,
before I left it, the charm of the place.
Analysis is an abominable business; I
am quite sure that people who work
out subjects thoroughly are disagreeable
wretches. One only feels as one should
when one does n't know much about the
matter. If I could give you, for a few
minutes, just as you are floating up the
canal just now, the kind of feeling I had
when I had just done my work, when
Venice presented itself to me merely as
so many " mouldings," and I had few
associations with any building but those
of more or less pain and puzzle and pro-
vocation. Pain of frost-bitten fingers
and chilled throat as I examined or drew
the window - sills in the wintry air ;
puzzlement from said window-sills which
did n't agree with the doorsteps — or
back of house, which would n't agree
with front ; and provocation, from every
sort of soul or thing in Venice at once ;
from my gondoliers, who were always
wanting to go home, and thought it
stupid to be tied to a post in the Grand
Canal all day long, and disagreeable to
have to row to Lido afterwards ; from
1 The greater part of this letter was printed
in my introduction to the Brantwood edition of
the Stones of Venice, 1886.
my cook, who was always trying to catch
lobsters on the doorsteps, and never
caught any ; from my valet de place, who
was always taking me to see nothing ;
and waiting by appointment — at the
wrong place ; from my English servant,
whom I caught smoking genteelly on
St. Mark's Place, and expected to bring
home to his mother quite an abandoned
character ; from my tame fish, who
splashed the water all over my room,
and spoiled my drawings ; from my little
sea-horses, who would n't coil their tails
about sticks when I asked them ; from a
fisherman outside my window, who used
to pound his crabs alive for bait every
morning just when I wanted to study
morning light on the Madonna della
Salute ; from the sacristans of all the
churches, who used never to be at home
when I wanted them ; from the bells of
all the churches, which used always to
ring most when I was at work in the
steeples ; from the tides, which never
were up, or down, at the hour they ought
to have been ; from the wind, which
used to blow my sketches into the canal,
and one day blew my gondolier after
them ; from the rain, which came
through the roof of the Scuola di San
Rocco ; from the sun, which blistered
Tintoret's Bacchus and Ariadne every
afternoon, at the Ducal palace, — and
from the Ducal palace itself, worst of all,
which would n't be found out, nor tell
me how it was built (I believe this sen-
tence had a beginning somewhere, which
wants an end some other where, but I
have n't any end for it, so it must go as
it is;) but apropos of fish, mind you get
a fisherman to bring you two or three
cavalli di mare, and put them in a basin
in your room, and see them swim. But
don't keep them more than a day, or
they '11 die ; put them into the canal again.
There was only one place in Venice
which I never lost the feeling of joy in ;
at least the pleasure which is better than
joy ; and that was just halfway between
the end of the Giudecca and St. George
586
Letters of John Ruskin.
of the Seaweed at sunset. If you tie
your boat to one of the posts there, you
can see at once the Euganeans, where
the sun goes down, and all the Alps, and
Venice behind you by this rosy sunlight ;
there is no other spot so beautiful. Near
the Armenian convent is however very
good also ; the city is handsomer, but the
place is not so simple and lonely.
I have got all the right feeling back,
now, however ; and hope to write a
word or two about Venice yet, when I
have got the mouldings well out of my
head — and the mud ; for the fact is,
with reverence be it spoken, that whereas
Rogers says, " there is a glorious city in
the Sea," a truthful person must say,
" There is a glorious city in the Mud."
It is startling at first to say so, but it goes
well enough with marble — " Oh Queen,
of marble and of Mud."
Well, I suppose that you will look at
my ' Venetian index in the Stones of
Venice, which is in St. Mark's library,
so that I need not tell you what pictures
I should like you to see, — so now I will
tell you a little about myself here. First,
I am not quite sure I shall be at home
at the middle of June — but I shall not
be on the Continent. You will, of course,
see the exhibition of Manchester, and if
not at home, I shall be somewhere in the
North, and my father and mother will
certainly be at home and know where I
am, in case we could plan a meeting.
And I shall leave your vignette in my
father's care. Secondly, you will be
glad to hear that the National Gallery
people have entrusted me to frame a
hundred Turners at their expense in my
own way ; leaving it wholly in my hands.
This has given me much thought, for had
I done the thing at my own cost, I could
have mended it afterward if it had gone
wrong in any way ; but now I must, if
possible, get it all perfect at first, or the
Trustees won't be pleased. It will all
be done by the time you come. Third-
ly, I have been very well all the winter,
and have not overworked in any way,
tn
eh
,
at
and I am angry with you for not saying
how you are. Fourthly, my drawing,
school goes on nicely, and the Marlbor-
ough House people are fraternizing with
me. Fifthly, I have written a nice lit-
tle book for beginners in drawing, whic
I intend to be mightily useful ; and so
that is all my news about myself, but
hope to tell you more, and hear a great
deal more when you come.
My father and mother beg their sin-
cere regards to you. Mine, if you please,
to your mother and sisters when you
write.
Please write me a line from Venice,
if you are not, as I used to be, out so
late in St. Mark's Place or on the la-
goons, that you can't do anything when
you come in. I used to be very fond
of night rowings between Venice and
Murano — and then the crossing back
through the town at midnight — we used
to come out always at the Bridge of
Sighs, because I lived either at Danieli's
or at a house nearly opposite the Church
of the Salute.
Well, good-bye, I can't write more to-
night, though I want to. Ever, my dear
Norton, affectionately yours,
J. RUSKIN.
Monday morning. I was half asleej
when I wrote that last page, or I would
n't have said anything about night ex-
cursions, which are n't good for you.
Go to bed. Moonlight 's quite a mis-
take ; it is nothing when you are used to
it. The moon is really very like a silver
salver, no, — more like a plated one half
worn out and coppery at the edges. It
is of no use to sit up to see that.
If you know Mr. Brown, please give
him my kind love ; and say I shall have
written to him by the time you get this.
Mind you leave yourself time enougl
for Verona. People always give too
little time to Verona ; it is my dearest
place in Italy. If you are vindictive,
and want to take vengeance on me for
despising Rome, write me a letter of
Letters of John Ruskin.
587
abuse of Verona. But be sure to do it
before you have seen it ; you can't after-
wards. You have seen it, I believe, but
give it time and quiet walks, now.
The evening school referred to in the
preceding letter was that which Ruskin
had now for three years conducted at
the Workingmen's College in Great Or-
niond Street. This college was founded
by Frederick Denison Maurice, with the
aid of such men as Dr. Furnivall, Tom
Hughes, and Charles Kingsley, with the
intention of offering " to workingmen
and others, who could not take advan-
tage of the higher education open to the
weal thy , as much of the best academic
training as could be given in evening
classes, and to combine this teaching
with a real esprit de corps, based on the
fellowship of citizens and the union of so-
cial orders." Ruskin enlisted readily in
this effort, for already his thoughts were
turned to those social questions which
were gradually to become the chief ob-
jects of his interest during his later
years. The classes at the drawing-
school, to which he gave instruction on
Thursday evenings through a great part
of the year, were mainly composed of
young men who were earning their liv-
ing, but were not* in the ranks of the
very poor. He gained from acquain-
tance with them a knowledge of actual
social conditions which tested his theo-
ries and stood him in good stead in later
years His sympathy, his patience, his
concern for their interests quickened
into affection the admiration which his
varied powers, exerted for the benefit of
his pupils, naturally excited in them, and
the indirect lessons which they received
from him were perhaps of even more
importance to them than his direct in-
struction. His interest and enthusiasm
in the work were contagious, and in the
course of the four or five years in which
he gave regular instruction at the school,
1 The story may be found in an article in the
Atlantic Monthly for June, 1889, entitled Raw-
he enlisted, as his associates in teaching,
Rossetti, and for a time William Morris
and Burne-Jones. The woi'k was one
to engage the sympathies of young ideal-
ists desirous to elevate and beautify the
life of England. Marlborough House,
to which Ruskin refers in his letter, was
then the headquarters of the govern-
ment Department of Science and Art,
removed not long afterwards to South
Kensington.
It was not for students under his
direction or that of his assistants at the
Workingmen's College that he wrote the
" nice little book " referred to in the let-
ter, — The Elements of Drawing, — but
for the many who might wish to learn to
draw and had no master to instruct them.
The chief aim and bent of its system was
discipline of the hand and the eye by a
patient and delicate method of work,
such as to insure a true sight and a cor-
rect representation of the object seen.
The little book did good service, and
though Ruskin became dissatisfied with
some portions of it, and intended to
supei'sede it by the Laws of Fe'sole, it
still remains in many respects an excel-
lent manual for the solitary student of
drawing dependent on his own efforts.
The " Mr. Brown " mentioned near
the end of this letter was Ruskin's " old
and tried friend," Mr. Rawdon Brown.
I did not then know this admirable and
unique man. More than ten years later
I had the good fortune of coming into
friendly relations with him. He had
lived in Venice since, as a youth, just
out of Oxford, in 1833, he went there on
a romantic quest.1 To the fine qualities
of a high-bred Englishman and old-
fashioned Tory he added a passionate
love of Venice, and an acquaintance with
her historic life in all its aspects, such as
few of her own sons ever possessed. His
days were given to the study of her rec-
ords and to the rescue of precious scraps
from Time's wallet. He died in 1884
don Brown and the Gravestone of " Banished
Norfolk."
588
"Intensely ffuman"
where he had lived for more than fifty
years, and where he desired to die.
I spent the month of July in England,
and was again at Denmark Hill, where
I was more than ever impressed with
Raskin's submissiveness to his mother,
who took manifest pride in "John," but
combated his opinions and lectured him
publicly, in spite of which he preserved
unruffled sweetness of manner toward
her. She had lived in a narrow circle of
strong interests, and knew little of the
world outside of it. Accustomed as I
have said to deference from her husband
and her son, she had acquired conviction
of her own infallibility, and her opinions
were expressed with decision and as if
admitting of no question. Raskin him-
self was delightful. His heart had not
yet become overburdened, nor his mind
overstrained. I wrote at the time : " He
is quite unspoiled by praise and by abuse,
of both of which he has received enough
to ruin a common man. His heart is still
fresh. It is pleasant to hear his friends
speak of him, — the Brownings, Rossetti,
Mrs. Gaskell : they all are warm in
speaking of his kindness, generosity and
faithfulness. Few men are so lovable."
The summer of 1857 was that of the
great Fine Arts Exhibition at Man-
chester. Ruskin had undertaken to give
two lectures there in the course of the
month of July. In order to secure un-
interrupted quiet for writing them he
proposed to spend a week or two at a
farmhouse near the picturesque little
village of Cowley, not far from Oxford,
and as I was to visit friends at Oxford
it was arranged that we should be there
at the same time. We were much to-
gether. He read to me from his lectures
as he wrote them, and the reading led
to long discussion. The lectures were
the first clear manifesto of the change
in the main interests of his life. They
were soon published under the title of
The Political Economy of Art, and when
reprinted, more than twenty years after-
ward, Ruskin gave them the name of " A
Joy Forever l (and its price in the mar-
ket)." In the preface to this edition of
1880, he wrote, " The exposition of the
truths to which I have given the chief
elegy of my life will be found in the
following pages, first undertaken system-
atically and then in logical sequence."
It will easily be understood how inter-
esting and how fruitful to me were the
talks we had while he was writing this
introduction to the thought and life of
his later years.
Before the end of the summer I
turned to America.
Charles Eliot Norton.
PART OF A MAN'S LIFE.
" The uttered part of a man's life, let us always repeat, bears to the unu tiered, unconscious
part a small unknown proportion. He himself never knows it, much less do others." — Carlyle\
Essay on Scott.
"INTENSELY HUMAN."
WHEN Major-General Rufus Saxton,
then military governor of South Caro-
lina, was solving triumphantly the ori-
ginal problem of the emancipated slaves,
he was frequently interrupted by long
lists of questions from Northern philan-
thropists as to the progress of his en-
terprise. They inquired especially
to the peculiar tastes, temptations, anc
perils of the newly emancipated race.
1 These words had been written in gold or
the cornice of the great exhibition.
'•'•Intensely Human"
589
After receiving one unusually elaborate
catechism of this kind, he said rather
impatiently to his secretary, "Draw a
line across that whole list of questions
about the freedmen, and write at the
bottom, ' They are intensely human, ' '
which was done. In those four words
is given, in my opinion, the whole key
to that problem perennially reviving,
— the so-called "negro question."
There prevailed, nearly sixty years
ago, at the outset of the anti-slavery
movement, a curious impression that
the only people who understood the
negro were those who had seen him in
a state of subjection, and that those who
advocated his cause at the North knew
nothing about him. A similar delusion
prevails at the present day, and not
alone among those born and bred in the
Southern states. I find in a book, other-
wise admirable, — • the Life of Whittier,
by Professor G. R. Carpenter of Colum-
bia College, ~ that the biographer not
only speaks of the original anti-slavery
movement as "extravagant and ill-in-
formed " (page 173), but says of Whit-
tier and his associates, "Of the real
negro, his capacities and limitations,
he had, like his fellows, only a dim
idea, based largely on theoretic specu-
lation " (page 179). But, as a matter
of fact, the whole movement originated
with men who had learned by personal
observation that the negro was intensely
human, and found all necessary know-
ledge to be included in that fact. They
were men and women who had been born
in the slave country, or had personally
resided there, perhaps for years. Ben-
jamin Lundy in Virginia, Rankin in
Tennessee, Garrison in Maryland, Bir-
ney in Alabama, Channing in Vir-
ginia again, and the Grimke' sisters in
South Carolina, had gained on the spot
that knowledge of slavery and slaves
which made them Abolitionists. They
had made observations, and some of
them — acting on the poet Gray's max-
im that memory is ten times worse than
a lead pencil — had written them down.
Added to this, they were constantly
in communication with those who had
escaped from slavery, and the very
closeness of contact into which the two
classes were thrown gave them added
knowledge of each other. Indeed, the
very first anti-slavery book which at-
tained wide attention, known as Walk-
er's Appeal, published in 1829, was
not written by a Northern man, but by
one born in Wilmington, South Caro-
lina, of a free mother and a slave father,
a man who had traveled widely through
the South, expressly to study the degra-
dation of his race, and had read what
books of history he could procure bear-
ing upon the subject. His book went
through three editions ; it advocated
insurrection more and more directly.
But it was based absolutely on the
Declaration of Independence and on
the theory that the negro was a man.
It must be borne in mind that there
never yet was an oppressed race which
was not assumed by its oppressors to
be incapable of freedom. In a late
volume of diplomatic correspondence
compiled from letters of an English-
man (Anthony B. North Peat), written
in 1864—69 during the sway of Louis
Napoleon, the letter- writer lays it down
as a rule (page 38) that "A Frenchman
is not fit to be trusted with liberty.
... A Frenchman is, more or less,
born to be rode roughshod over, and he
himself is positively happier when ruled
with a rod of iron." Forty years have
now passed since this was written, and
who now predicts the extinction of the
French Republic? It turned out just
the same with those who predicted that
the colored race in America was fitted
only for slavery and would never attain
freedom.
If I may refer to my own experience
as one of the younger Abolitionists, I
can truly say that my discovery of the
negro's essential manhood first came,
long before I had heard of the anti-
slavery agitation, from a single remark
of a slave made to my mother when she
590
"'Intensely Human.""
was traveling in Virginia in my child-
hood. After some efforts on her part
to convince him that he was well off, he
only replied, " Ah ! Missis, free breath
is good! " There spoke, even to my
childish ear, the instinctive demand of
the human heing. To this were after-
wards added my own observations when
visiting in the same state during a col-
lege vacation, at the age of seventeen,
and observing the actual slaves on a
plantation ; which experience was after-
wards followed by years of intimate ac-
quaintance with fugitive slaves in Mas-
sachusetts. It was the natural result of
all this that, when called upon in ma-
turer life to take military command of
freed slaves, it never occurred to me to
doubt that they would fight like any
other men for their liberty, and so it
proved. Yet I scarcely ever met a
man or woman of Southern birth, during
all that interval, who would not have
laughed at the very thought of making
them soldiers. They were feared as
midnight plotters, as insurrectionists,
disciples of Nat Turner, whose outbreak
in 1831 filled the South with terror;
but it was never believed, for a mo-
ment, that they would stand fire in the
open field like men. Yet they proved
themselves intensely human and did it.
Nor was their humanity recognized
by the general public sentiment, even
at the North, in earlier days. .Even
in Massachusetts, law or custom not
only forbade any -merchant or respect-
able mechanic to take a colored appren-
tice, but any common carrier by land or
sea was expected to eject from his con-
veyance any negro on complaint of any
white passenger; and I can myself re-
member when a case of this occurred
in Cambridge in my childhood, within
sight of the Washington Elm. Churches
still had negro pews, these being some-
times boarded up in front, so that the
occupants could only look out through
peepholes, as was once done in the old
Baptist meeting-house at Hartford,
Connecticut, where a negro had bought
a pew and refused to leave it. Or the
owner might be ejected by a constable,
as happened in Park Street Church,
Boston ; or the floor cut from under the
negro's pew by the church authorities,
as happened in Stoughton, Massachu-
setts. Even in places like the Quaker
town of New Bedford, where pupils of
both colors were admitted to the public
schools, the black boys were seated by
themselves, and white offenders were
punished by being obliged to sit with
them. So far was this carried, that it
excited the indignation of the European
world, in so much that Heine in his let-
ters from Heligoland (July 1, 1830)
gives it as an argument against emi-
grating to the United States, as Lieber
and Follen had done : " Die eigentliche
Sklaverei, die in den meisten nord-
amerikanischen Provinzen abgeschafft,
emport mich nicht so sehr wie die
Brutalitat womit die freien Schwarzen
und die Mulatten behandelt werden."
The negro was still regarded, both in
the Northern and in the Southern
states, as being something imperfectly
human. It was only the Abolitionists
who saw him as he was. They never
doubted that he would have human
temptations — to idleness, folly, waste-
fulness, even sensuality. They knew
that he would need, like any abused
and neglected race, education, moral
instruction, and, above all, high exam-
ple. They knew, in short, all that we
know about him now. They could
have predicted the outcome of such
half -freedom as has been given' him, —
a freedom tempered by chain-gangs,
lynching, and the lash.
It may be assumed, therefore,
there is no charge more unfounded ths
that frequently made to the effect that
the negro was best understood by his
former masters. This principle maj
be justly borne in mind in forming
opinion upon the very severest charge
still brought against him. Thus
Southern negro has only to be suspecte
of any attempt at assault on a whit
"Intensely Human"
591
woman, and the chances are that he
will be put to death without trial, and
perhaps with fiendish torture. Yet dur-
ing my two years' service with col-
ored troops, only one charge of such as-
sault was brought against any soldier,
and that was withdrawn in the end and
admitted to be false by the very man
who made the assertion; and this in a
captured town. But even supposing
him to have a tendency to such an of-
fense, does any one suppose for a mo-
ment that the mob which burns him on
suspicion of such crime is doing it in
defense of chastity ? Not at all ; it is
in defense of caste. To decide its real
character we need only ask what would
happen if the facts proved to be the
reverse of those at first assumed, — if
the woman proved to have, after all,
the slightest tinge of negro blood, and
the offending man turned out to be a
white man. Does anybody doubt that
the case would be dismissed by accla-
mation in an instant, that the criminal
would go free, and the victim be forgot-
ten? If I err, then the books of evi-
dence are all wrong, the tales of fugi-
tives in the old days are all false. Was
any white man ever lynched, either be-
fore or since emancipation, for insulting
the modesty of a colored girl ? Look in
the autobiographies of slaves, dozens of
which are in our public libraries ! Look
in the ante-bellum newspapers, or search
the memories of those who, like the
present writer, were employed on vigi-
lance committees and underground rail-
ways before most of the present lynch-
ers were born!
There were, again and again, women
known to us who had fled to save their
honor, — women so white that, like
Ellen Craft, they passed in traveling for
Caucasian. One such woman was under
my observation for a whole winter in
Worcester, who brought away with her
the two children of her young master,
whose mistress she had been, in spite of
herself, and who was believed by many to
have been her half-brother. So nearly
white were she and her children that
they were escorted up from Boston by a
Worcester merchant, himself pro-slav-
ery in sympathy, under whose escort
they had been skillfully put at the Bos-
ton station by the agent of the under-
ground railway. They finally passed
into the charge of an honorable man, a
white mechanic, who married her with
the full approval of the ladies who had
her in charge. I never knew or wished
to know his name, thinking it better that
she and her children should disappear,
as they easily could, in the white ranks.
Another slave child, habitually passing
for white, was known to the public as
" Ida May, " and was exhibited to au-
diences as a curiosity by Governor An-
drew and others, until that injudicious
practice was stopped. She, too, was un-
der my care for a time, went to school,
became clerk in a public office, and I
willingly lost sight of her also for a sim-
ilar reason. It must never be forgotten
that every instance of slaves almost
white, in those days, was not the outcome
of legal marriage, but of the ungoverned
passions of some white man. The evil
was also self -multiplying, since the fair-
er the complexion of every half-breed
girl the greater was her attraction and
her perils. Those who have read that
remarkable volume of Southern stories,
written in New Orleans by Grace King,
under the inexpressive title of Tales of
a Time and Place, will remember the
striking scene where a mob, which had
utterly disregarded the danger run by
a young girl who had passed for a mere
octoroon, is lashed instantly into over-
powering tumult when evidence is sud-
denly advanced at the last moment that
she is not octoroon, but white.
Supposing, for the sake of argument,
that there is to be found in the colored
race, especially in the former slave
states, a lower standard of chastity than
among whites, it is hard to imagine any
reasoning more grotesque than that
which often comes from those who claim
to represent the white race there. One
592
"Intensely Human'''
recent writer from New Orleans in the
Boston Herald describes the black race
as being "in great part immoral in its
sexual relations, whether from centu-
ries of savagery or from nature, as some
of the travelers insisted." This needs
only to be compared with the testimony
of another Southern witness to show its
folly. In a little book entitled Two
Addresses on Negro Education in the
South, Mr. A. A. Gunby, of the Louis-
iana bar, makes this simple statement :
" Miscegenation in the South has always
been and will always be confined to con-
verse between white men and colored
women, and the number of mulattoes
in the future will depend absolutely on
the extent to which white men restrain
their immoral dealings with negro fe-
males." This same writer goes on to
say, what would seem to be the obvious
common sense of the matter, that " edu-
cation is the best possible means to for-
tify negro women against the approaches
of libertines."
For my own part, I have been for
many years in the position to know the
truth, even on its worst side, upon this
subject. Apart from the knowledge
derived in college days from Southern
students, then very numerous at Har-
vard, with whom I happened to be much
thrown through a Southern relative, my
classmate, I have evidence much beyond
this. I have in my hands written evi-
dence, unfit for publication, but discov-
ered in a captured town during the civil
war, — evidence to show that Rome in
its decline was not more utterly de-
graded, as to the relation between the
sexes, than was the intercourse often ex-
isting between white men and colored
women on American slave plantations.
How could it be otherwise where one sex
had all the power and the other had no
means of escape? Rufus Choate, one
of the most conservative Northern men
of the time as to the slavery question,
is said to have expressed the opinion,
as the result of careful study, that he
had no reason to think that the indus-
trial condition of the slave, all things
considered, was worse than that of the
laboring population in most European
countries, but that for the colored wo-
man the condition of slavery was "sim-
ply hell." The race of mixed blood in
America is the outcome of that condi-
tion; and that the colored race has
emerged from such subjugation into the
comparatively decent moral condition
which it now holds proves conclusively
that it is human in its virtues as well as
in its sins. This I say as one who has
been for nearly ten years trustee of a
school for freedmen in the heart of the
black district. The simple fact, ad-
mitted by all candid men and women,
that no charges of immorality are ever
brought against the graduates of these
schools, and that, wherever they go,
they are the centre of a healthy influ-
ence, is sufficient proof that what the
whole nation needs is to deal with the
negro race no longer as outcasts, but
simply as men and women.
If thus dealt with, why should the
very existence of such a race be regarded
as an insuperable evil ? The answer is
that the tradition lies solely in the as-
sociations of slavery. Outside of this
country, such insuperable aversion plain-
ly does not exist; not even is it to be
found in the land nearest to us in kin-
dred, England. A relative of mine, a
Boston lady distinguished in the last
generation for beauty and bearing, was
staying in London with her husband, fif-
ty years ago, when they received a call at
breakfast time from a mulatto of fine ap-
pearance, named Prince Sanders, whom
they had known well as a steward, or
head waiter, in Boston. She felt that
she ought to ask him, as a fellow coun-
tryman, to sit down at table with them,
but she shrank from doing it until he
rose to go ; and then, in a cowardly man-
ner, as she frankly admitted, stammered
out the invitation. To which his reply
was, "Thank you, madam, but I am
engaged to breakfast with a duke, this
morning, " which turned out to be true.
"Intensely Human"
593
No one can watch the carriages in Hyde
Park, still less in Continental capitals,
without recognizing the merely local
quality of all extreme social antagonism
between races. In a letter to the Bos-
ton Herald, dated September 17, 1903,
the writer, Bishop Douet of Jamaica,
testifies that there is a large class of
colored people who there fill important
positions as ministers of religion, doc-
tors, and lawyers. He says :" This ele-
ment in our society that I have alluded
to is the result of miscegenation, which
the writers from the South seem to look
upon with so much horror. We have
not found that the mixing of the races
has produced such dire results. I num-
ber among my friends many of this
mixed race who are as accomplished
and intelligent ladies and gentlemen
as you can find in any society in Bos-
ton or the other great cities of Amer-
ica."
In connection with this, Bishop
Douet claims that the masses of the
colored population in all parts of the
island are absolutely orderly, and that
a white woman may travel from one end
of the land to the other with perfect
safety. All traces of the terrible pe-
riod of the Maroon wars seem to have
vanished, wars which lasted for nine
years, during which martial law pre-
vailed throughout the whole island, and
high military authorities said of the
Maroons that "their subjugation was
more difficult than to obtain a victory
over any army in Europe. " These reb-
els, or their descendants, are the people
who now live in a condition of entire
peace and order, in spite of all the pre-
dicted perils of freedom. One of these
perils, as we know, was supposed to be
that of a mixture of blood between the
races, but even that is found no longer
a source of evil, this witness thinks,
when concubinage has been replaced by
legal marriage.
Among the ways in which the col-
ored race shows itself intensely human
are some faults which it certainly shares
VOL. xcm. — NO. 559. 38
with the white race, besides the mere-
ly animal temptations. There is the
love of fine clothes, for instance; the
partiality for multiplying sects in reli-
gion, and secret societies in secular life ;
the tendency toward weakening forces
by too much subdivision ; the intolerance
shown toward free individual action. It
is only the last which takes just now a
somewhat serious form. It is a positive
calamity that a few indiscretions and
exaggerations on each side have devel-
oped into a bitter hostility to Booker
Washington on the part of some of the
most intelligent and even cultivated of
his race. Internal feuds among philan-
thropists are, alas, no new story, and
few bodies of reformers have escaped
this peril. When we consider the bit-
ter contest fought by Charles Sumner
and his opponents in the Prison Disci-
pline Society ; the conflicts in the early
temperance meetings between Total Ab-
stainers and Teetotalers; those in the
Woman Suffrage Movement between
Mrs. Woodhull and her opponents, and
in the anti-slavery movement itself be-
tween the voting and non-voting Aboli-
tionists, we must not censure the war-
ring negro reformer too severely. Nay,
consider the subdivisions of the Garrison
Abolitionists themselves, after slavery
itself was abolished, at a period when I
remember to have seen Edmund Quincy
walk halfway up a stairway, and turn
suddenly round to descend, merely to
avoid Wendell Phillips, who was coming
downstairs. Having worked side by
side together through storm and through
calm, denounced, threatened, and even
mobbed side by side, the two men had
yet separated in bitterness on the mere
interpretation of a will made by a fel-
low laborer, Francis Jackson. When
we look, moreover, beyond the circle of
moral reformers, and consider simply
the feuds of science, we see the same
thing : Dr. Gould, the eminent astrono-
mer, locking his own observatory against
his own trustees to avoid interference;
and Agassiz, in the height of the Dar-
594
"Intensely Human."
winian controversy, denying that there
was any division on the subject among
scientific men, on the ground that any
man who accepted the doctrine of evolu-
tion ceased thereby to be a man of sci-
ence. If questions merely intellectual
thus divide the leaders of thought, how
can we expect points dividing men on
the basis of conscience and moral service
to be less potent in their influence ? In
the present case, as in most cases, the
trouble seems chiefly due to the diffi-
culty found by every energetic and en-
thusiastic person, absorbed in his own
pursuits, in fully appreciating the equal-
ly important pursuits of others. Mr.
Washington, in urging the development
of the industrial pursuits he represents,
has surely gone no farther than Freder-
ick Douglass, the acknowledged leader
of his people, who said, " Every colored
mechanic is by virtue of circumstances
an elevator of his race." On the other
hand, the critics of Mr. Washington are
wholly right in holding that it is as
important for this race to produce its
own physicians, lawyers^ preachers, and,
above all, teachers, as to rear mechanics.
It is infinitely to be regretted that every-
body cannot look at every matter all
round, but this, unhappily, is a form
of human weakness in which there is
no distinction of color.
It must always be remembered that
all forward movements have their ex-
perimental stage. In looking over, at
this distance of time, the letters and
printed editorials brought out by the
original enterprise of arming the blacks
in our civil war, I find that it was re-
garded by most people as a mere ex-
periment. It now seems scarcely credi-
ble that I should have received, as I
did, one letter from a well-meaning
sympathizer in Boston, recalling to my
memory that Roman tradition of a body
of rebellious slaves who were brought
back to subjection, even after taking
up arms, by the advance of a body of
men armed with whips only. This cor-
respondent anxiously warned me that
the same method might be repeated.
Yet it seems scarcely more credible that
the young hero, Colonel Shaw himself,
when I rode out to meet him, on his
arrival with his regiment, seriously
asked me whether I felt perfectly sure
that the negroes would stand fire in line
of battle, and suggested that, at the
worst, it would at least be possible to
drive them forward by having a line of
white soldiers advance in their rear, so
that they would be between two fires.
He admitted the mere matter of indi-
vidual courage to have been already set-
tled in their case, and only doubted
whether they would do as well in line
of battle as in skirmishing and on guard
duty. Nor do I intend to imply that
he had any serious doubt beyond this,
but simply that the question had passed
through his mind. He did not suffi-
ciently consider that in this, as at all
other points, they were simply men.
We must also remember that a com-
mon humanity does not by any means
exclude individual variety, but rather
protects it. At first glance, in a black
regiment, the men usually looked to a
newly arrived officer just alike, but it
proved after a little experience that they
varied as much in face as any soldiers.
It was the same as to character. Yet at
the same time they were on the whole
more gregarious and cohesive than the
whites ; they preferred organization,
whereas nothing pleased white American
troops so much as to be out skirmishing,
each on his own responsibility, without
being bothered with officers. There
was also a certain tropical element in
black troops, a sort of fiery utterance
when roused, which seemed more Celtic
than Anglo - Saxon. The only point
where I was doubtful, though I never
had occasion to test it, was that they
might show less endurance under pro-
longed and hopeless resistance, like Na-
poleon's men when during the retreat
from Russia they simply drooped and
died.
As to the general facts of courage and
'•'•Intensely Human"
595
reliability, I think that no officer in our
camp ever thought of there being any
essential difference between black and
white ; and surely the judgment »f these
officers, who were risking their lives at
every moment, month after month, on
the fidelity of their men, was worth more
than the opinion of the world besides.
As the negroes were intensely human
at these points, they were equally so in
pointing out that they had more to fight
for than the white soldier. They loved
the United States flag, and I remember
one zealous corporal, a man of natural
eloquence, pointing to it during a meet-
ing on the Fourth of July, and saying
with more zeal than statistical accuracy,
"Dar's dat flag, we hab lib under it
for eighteen hundred and sixty-two
years, and we '11 lib and die for it now."
But they could never forget that, besides
the flag and the Union, they had home
and wife and child to fight for. War
was a very serious matter to them.
They took a grim satisfaction when
orders were issued that the officers of
colored troops should be put to death
on capture. It helped their esprit de
corps immensely. Their officers, like
themselves, were henceforward to fight
with ropes around their necks. Even
when the new black regiments began to
come down from the North, the Southern
blacks pointed out this difference, that
in case of ultimate defeat, the Northern
troops, black or white, must sooner or
later be exchanged and returned to
their homes, whereas, they themselves
must fight it out or be reenslaved. All
this was absolutely correct reasoning,
and showed them human.
As all individuals differ, even in the
same family, so there must doubtless
be variations between different races.
It is only that these differences balance
one another so that all are human at
last. Each race, like each individual,
may have its strong point. Compare,
for instance, the negroes and the Irish-
Americans. So universal among ne-
groes is the possession of a musical ear
that I frequently had reason to be grate-
ful for it as a blessing, were it only for
the fact that those who saw colored
soldiers for the first time always noticed
it and exaggerated its importance. Be-
cause the negroes kept a better step,
after forty-eight hours' training, than
did most white regiments after three
or four months, these observers ex-
pressed the conviction that the blacks
would fight well ; which seemed to me,
perhaps, a hasty inference. As to the
Irish- Americans, I could say truly that
a single recruit of that race in my ori-
ginal white company had cost me more
trouble in training him to keep step
than all my black soldiers put together.
On the other hand, it was generally
agreed that it was impossible to conceive
of an Irish coward; the Irish being,
perhaps, as universally brave as any
race existing. Now, I am not pre-
pared to say that in the colored race
cowardice would be totally impossible,
nor could that be claimed, absolutely,
for the Anglo-Saxon race. On the
other hand, to extend the comparison,
it would not have been conceivable to
me that a black soldier should be a
traitor to his own side, and it is unques-
tionable that there were sometimes Irish
deserters. All this variety is accord-
ing to the order of nature. The world
would be very monotonous if all human
beings had precisely the same combi-
nation of strong and weak points. It
is enough that they should all be hu-
man.
In the element of affectionateness
and even demonstrativeness, the negroes
and the Irish have much in common, and
it is an attribute which makes them
both attractive. The same may be held
true of the religious element. No mat-
ter how reckless in bearing they might
be, those negroes were almost fatalists
in their confidence that God would
watch over them ; and if they died, it
would be because their time had come.
" If each one of us was a praying man, "
said one of my corporals in a speech,
596
'•'•Intensely Human"
"it appears to me that we could fight
as well with prayers as with bullets, for
the Lord has said that if you have faith
even as a grain of mustard seed cut into
four parts, you can say to the sycamore
tree 'Arise,' and it will come up."
And though Corporal Long's botany
may have got a little confused, his faith
proved itself by works, for he volun-
teered to go many miles on a solitary
scouting expedition into the enemy's
country in Florida, and got back safe
after he had been given up for lost. On
the whole, it may be said that the
colored and the Irish soldiers were a
little nearer to one another than to the
white American - born type ; and that
both were nearer to the Western re-
cruits, among Americans, than to the
more reticent and self -controlled New
England men. Each type had its char-
acteristics, and all were intensely hu-
man.
All these judgments, formed in war,
have thus far sustained themselves in
peace. The enfranchisement of the
negroes, once established, will of course
never be undone. They have learned
the art, if not of political self-defense,
at least of migration from place to place,
and those states which are most unjust
to them will in time learn to prize their
presence and regret their absence. The
chances are that the mingling of races
will diminish, but whether this is or is
not the outcome, it is, of course, better
for all that this result should be legal
and not voluntary, rather than illegal
and perhaps forced. As the memories
of the slave period fade away, the mere
fetich of color-phobia will cease to con-
trol our society ; and marriage may come
to be founded, not on the color of the
skin, but upon the common courtesies
of life, and upon genuine sympathies of
heart and mind. To show how high
these sympathies might reach even in
slavery, I turn back to a letter received
by one of my soldiers from his wife, —
a letter which I have just unearthed
from a chaos of army papers where it
has lain untouched for forty years. It
is still inclosed in a quaint envelope of
a pattern devised in Philadelphia at
that day, and greatly in demand among
the negroes. It shows a colored print
of the tree of liberty bearing in the
place of leaves little United States flags,
each labeled with the name of some
state, while the tree bears the date
"1776 " at its roots. The letter is ad-
dressed to " Solomon Steward Company
H., 1st S. C. Vols., Beaufort, S. C.,"
this being the name of a soldier in my
regiment who showed the letter to me
and allowed me to keep it. He was
one of the Florida men, who were, as a
rule, better taught and more intelligent
than the South Carolina negroes. They
were therefore coveted as recruits by all
my captains ; and they had commonly
been obliged on enlistment to leave their
families behind them in Florida, not
nearly so well cared for as those under
General Saxton's immediate charge.
The pay of my regiment being, more-
over, for a long time delayed, these
families often suffered in spite of all
our efforts. I give the letter verbatim,
and it requires no further explana-
tion : —
FERNANDINA, FLORIDA, Feb. the 8 [1864].
MY DEAR HUSBAND, — This Hoi
I Sit Me Down To write you In a Lit-
tle world of sweet sounds The Choir
The Chapel near Here are Chanting at
The organ and Thair Morning Hymi
across The street are sounding and The
Dear Little birds are joining Thair
voices In Tones sweet and pure as an-
gels whispers, but My Dear all The
songs of The birds sounds sweet In My
Ear but a sweeter song Than That
now Hear and That Is The song of
administing angel Has Come and borm
My Dear Little babe To Join In Tone
with Them sweet and pure as angel
whispers. My babe only Live one daj
It was a Little Girl. Her name Is alice
Gurtrude steward I am now sick In bed
and have Got nothing To Live on The
The Bachelors of Braggy.
597
Rashion That They Give for six days I
Can Make It Last but 2 days They
dont send Me any wood They send The
others wood and I Cant Get any I dont
Get any Light at all You Must see To
That as soon as possible for I am In
in want of some Thing To Eat
I have nothing more to say to you
but Give my Regards to all the friends
all the family send thair love to you
no more at pressant
EMMA STEWAKD
Does it need any further commen-
tary to prove that the writer of a letter
like this was intensely human?
Thomas Wentworth Higginson.
THE BACHELORS OF BRAGGY.
WHILST their old mother lived, of
course, the idea of bringing any other
woman into the house was as far from
them as the far-lands of Brenter. For
they had all the nearness and lack of
sentiment that their Scotch ancestors
brought over (their only belongings) to
Ireland.
When the neighbors, on a rare oc-
casion, caught the Bachelors of Braggy
at a wake or festivity, they, in a wag-
gish mood, must match-make for them.
"Arrah, Pether Lowry, isn't it the
shame for yerself, and for Paul, and
for Richard, there beside ye, that wan
of yous hasn't yet put the word to a
woman ! "
Peter and Paul and Richard would
all hissle in their chairs from the un-
comfortableness of the topic. But all
eyes in the wakehouse were now on
them quizzically, so Peter would make
answer snarlingly : —
" What the divil do we want with a
woman ? "
"Ay!" from Paul. And "Ay!"
from Richard.
"Well, ye know, it 's a wee waik-
ness some men has, — to be fond of
the girls."
"Well, we aren't fond o' them;
an' would n't give a barleycorn if there
wasn't a girl atween here an' Haly-
fax."
" Yis ! " " Yis ! " from Richard and
Paul.
"But ye know, yerself, Pether, an'
can't deny, a woman 's an oncommon
handy thing about a house."
" Handy ? Ay ! as a conthrairy pig
(not mainin' any comparishon), that
'ill go every way but the way ye want
it. Besides, have n't we our ouF mo-
ther?"
"Right, Pether!" "Right, Pe-
ther ! " quoth the other brothers.
u Stillandall, a mother, ye know, is
n't everything till a man! "
"If a man depends on any one else
nor himself to be the remaindher,
he '11 depend on a rotten rush. An'
a wife an' a mother in the wan house
'ud be as pleasant company as spittin'
cats."
"But the wife 'ill be with a man,
Pether, when the mother 's gone."
"Then God help the man! "
" God help him ! " from Paul, and
"God help him! " from Richard.
"Now there 's Marg'et McClane
above in Altidoo, and she 'd jump at
the offer of any wan of the three of
yous."
"It 's thankful we are to both yer-
self and Marg'et; but, as ye seem to
have an inth'rest in her, better not let
her jump, for feerd she might miss."
" For feerd she might miss, — y is ! "
choired Richard and Paul.
"A fine, stout, sthrappin' girl, on the
aisy side of fifty -five ; an' a fine hand at
beetlin' praties, an' carin' calves."
598
The Bachelors of JBraggy.
But poor Peter's temper would, de-
spite desperate efforts, give out : —
"Och, to the divil with Marg'et
McClane an' her calves! We don't
want her ! We don't want no woman !
An' if we did want wan, we would n't
ax you to make her for us ! "
"Right ye are, Pether! " "Right
ye are, Pether! " quoth the brothers.
Then a deal of half-smothered chuck-
ling would sweep around the four walls ;
and Peter's tormentor would, with a
look of injured innocence, turn on his
chair, and make general complaint that
he never yet could try to do a neighbor
— because he was a neighbor — a good
turn, but he contrived to have the nose
cut off him. In response to which
Richard and Paul — Peter was too full
for speech — would mutter something
about " imperent people " poking their
noses into places where they were not
wanted. And then the doubly injured
one sought consolation in the reeking
pipe which a compassionate neighbor
passed him.
And as insistent friends had often
assured them, the old woman did die
one day: and she was waked and laid
away with all the economy known to
the three brothers, — an economy that,
they flattered themselves, would be more
gratifying to the woman who was gone,
if she only could realize it, than to any
one else. And then it was voted that
Richard, who was the youngest and
least useful, should henceforth fill their
mother's place in the house, — milk,
and wash, and cook, and make the but-
ter.
Though Richard undertook the duties
with ardor, he grumbled ere a month,
and said that, after all, the neighbors
remarked rightly that a woman was a
"mortial handy, convenient thing about
a house. " Both Peter and Paul gasped
for breath when first he sprang this
sedition upon them ; and then they
frowned upon him with awful severity,
and hoped (in their bitterest tones) that
he would never let the like of that split
his lips again. And Richard did not
let it split his lips again for two days.
Peter and Paul were sorely distressed,
however, when, as they sat round the fire
and passed the pipe, in their usual after-
supper deliberation, on the third night
following, Richard again brought up the
subject of a woman's want, and held
forth thereupon at much length. They
were so sorely distressed that they spake
not; only let Richard ramble on.
And so often again did Richard press
home the subject, that Peter and Paul,
after many secret consultations, con-
sented that, even at the cost of their
peace of mind, Richard must be hu-
mored. So they said to Richard,
"It 's a poor thing that we must fetch
in any man's daughter to support her."
"No man's daughter comes in here, "
Richard said, "onless she fetches her
support with her."
" Hum ! Then fire away, Richard,
since ye must have yer way. Where are
ye goin' to rise yer woman? "
" My woman? Faith, it 's not me 's
goin' to take her, but wan of yerselves.
/ don't want her."
"Faith, and I 'm very sure it 's not
me that 'ill take her," said Peter.
"An' I '11 give ye me 'davy it is n't
me," quoth Paul.
So Richard made the whistling sound
of a man who has found a cul-de-sac
where he was certain of a free passage.
"An' what then? " said Richard.
"Richard, astoir,it 's oftenyeheerd
our poor mother (God rest her!) say,
' Let him calls for the tune pay the
piper.'"
"I'm young an' green, boys"
(Richard would be forty-seven by Hal-
lowmas night), "an' I 'm noways suited
to manage a woman," he said plead -
" Well, there ye are ! " For neither
Peter nor Paul was anxious to help him
out of a dilemma into which stubborn-
ness had led him. •
"But, boys" —
" 'As ye make yer bed ye must
The Bachelors of Braggy.
599
on it, ' " said they, quoting again from
their mother's store of saws.
There was nothing left to Kichard
but to accept the inevitable ; and he
reluctantly resolved to bear it, for the
benefit of the house, with what grace
he could.
As the next step was to find a suit-
able woman for Richard, the brothers
agreed to take counsel with the Bacach
Gasta (the swift-footed beggar-man).
So, on the next night when the Bacach
Gasta, coming that way, dropped his
wallets in Lowrys' for his usual night's
sojourn, he was taken into confidence
after supper, and asked to procure a
good wife for Richard. And the re-
quirements were catalogued for him.
"The notion o' marry in' is on Rich-
ard," Paul informed the Bacach.
He looked Richard up and down, and
then said, —
" Well, that 's neither shame nor
blame. He 's come to the time o'
day."
"In throth, it 's wan of ourselves he
wanted to take the woman."
"Which wasn't wan bit fair," said
the beggar-man. "The young heart
always for the big burden."
"In your thravels do ye think ye
could pick up a suitable wife for us ? "
"I have no doubt of it."
"Ye know just the kind of a wife
we want for him ? "
"I have a brave guess."
"A fine, sthrong, sthrappin', agri-
cultural woman," said Peter.
"Ay."
"No frills or foldherols, " said Paul.
"No figgery-foys whatsomiver, " said
Peter.
"She must be 'holsome " (whole-
some), said Richard.
"An' as hardy as a harrow-pin,"
said Peter.
"No objection if the countenance is
well-favored," said Richard.
"Bacach," said Peter, with indig-
nant warmth, "she may be as ill-
lookin' as the divil's gran 'mother."
"Don't send any chiny doll here,"
said Paul.
Said Richard, " I mean, for ins'ance,
Bacach, if ye are in swithers about two
weemen, both equally good in every
other way, but wan of them havin' the
advantage of the other in looks " —
"Then," said Peter, "sen* us the
ugliest o' the two, by all manner o'
mains."
"The uglier the woman, the better
housekeeper," Paul added.
"An' the more savin' ; an' the less
she '11 throw out upon fine clothes, "
quoth Peter.
Richard was silent.
"The woman ye pick must have
money, — a good penny of it, " said
Peter.
"Or Ian'," said Paul.
"Or Ian', of course," Peter added.
"She must be come to years of dis-
cretion, " said Paul.
"An' have the most of a couple of
score years of work in her still, " said
Peter.
"She must be able an' willin' to
work," said Paul.
"To work like a nigger, " said Peter.
"If she 's a bit youngish, she '11 be
the companionabler, " said Richard.
"A bit ouldish, Bacach, an' she '11
be the sensibler, " said Peter tartly.
The Bacach Gasta was nodding as-
sent to all.
"She must be as wise as a fox."
"An' as close as a meal-chist."
"She must understand all about
bringin' up young calves an' pigs, " said
Peter.
"An' about doctorin' sick cattle,"
said Paul.
"She can't be too sthrong," Peter
added.
" Sthrong enough to toss a bull, "
said Paul.
"An' kindly," interpolated poor
Richard.
" Kindly ! Phew ! " said Paul.
"Sevair enough to sour crame, if ye
like, " said Peter.
600
The Bachelors of Braggy.
"Now, do ye know what we want? "
said Paul.
" Yis, to the nail on her little finger, "
said the Bacach Gasta, passing the pipe
to Peter.
"Well, keep yer eyes open, then,"
said Peter, "when ye 're up in the
Dhrimholme parish. Out of there
comes the best scantlin' of weemen I
know. "
"They 're better down the shore side
of the parish," said Richard.
"They 're hardier hack the moun-
tain way, " said Paul.
"The worst woman in Dhrimholme
is worth her ma it, " said the Bacach.
"This is Chewsda. I '11 be up there
again' Sathurda. I have a likely cou-
ple or three in me eye, an' I '11 see if
I can't fix yous up in wan."
Eight days later the Bacach Gasta
was back with word that he had a
likely woman, — a girl who had got
the better of her fortieth year, and still
remained unmarried, though she had a
valuable farm on hand, and lived by her-
self on it. He guaranteed, moreover,
that, in his opinion, she was everything
they desired.
Peter proposed then that she should
be invited down till they would satisfy
themselves that she answered the in-
voice. But Richard said that would
be too much to expect. And the Ba-
cach, as her diplomat, — which he now
was, — would not agree to the propo-
sition : they must go to see her. More-
over, failing the brothers' approval of
her, he informed them he had two
other wise and well-circumstanced wo-
men whom he wished to show them.
On the first day after, which was too
wet for any more profitable work,
Peter and Paul took the road with
Richard, and tramped to Dhrimholme,
and to Hannah Jack's house, — Han-
nah Jack was her name, — in pursu-
ance of the beggar-man's detailed di-
rections. They went in and introduced
themselves.
"The Bacach Gasta, as ye know,"
Peter said to her, " has advised us that
he b'lieves ye 'd make a suitable wo-
man for us " —
" For yous ? " said Hannah, empha-
sizing the plural.
"Well, for young Richard here.
But it 's all the same."
"Oh!"
"An' so," Peter continued, "we 've
come to see for ourselves."
Whilst, then, Hannah Jack busied
herself preparing tea for them, Peter
and Paul and Richard scanned her,
and followed every move of her, and
did not leave the arrangements of the
house unnoticed, either. Over the tea
they, in an incidental sort of way, put
various questions to her regarding her
farm and farm-stock, — and, in a
quiet way, satisfied their thirst for
knowledge in that direction. And
when tea was finished, they pulled
around the fire, Hannah in the middle,
and came to business bluntly, putting
Hannah through a catechism that dis-
covered to them her virtues and her
failings and her worldly worth.
"Now, you '11 excuse us for just a
few minutes till we have a word to-
gether," Peter said to her, as he rose,
and beckoned his brothers to follow
him toward the door.
They went without, and, after in-
specting the calves and pigs, they pro-
ceeded around to the gable of the house,
and held serious deliberation upon Han-
nah's suitability. On the whole, Rich-
ard thought, he might go farther and
fare worse. So he gave his vote for
Hannah. But, unfortunately, Peter
was prejudiced because, when she had
taken down the teapot, she extrava-
gantly cast the old tea leaves into the
pit. "An' that tay she uses is too good
for such exthravagance ; it would take
a lovely grip of the second wather."
And during tea, Paul taking advan-
tage of Hannah's temporary absence,
had peeped into a bandbox, and ob-
served that she owned a hat with fea-
thers. "An' both of yous know as well
The Bachelors of Braggy.
601
as I do, " Paul said, "what that mains,
— that she 'd let consait fly away with
her cash." "So," said Peter, "all
things bein' consithered, I think it 's
wiser laive Hannah Jack to be fortuned
on foolisher fellas."
"That's my opinion exactly," said
Paul.
Richard whistled to himself a min-
ute, and then said, "Well, yous have
better tell her the vardict, an' lose no
more valuable time."
"Richard," said they, "just tell her
yerself . If ye are n't too good to do
yer own business."
Richard could not confess he was.
So he had to command his soul grimly,
and go within, alone.
"No, thank you, Hannah Jack," he
said, "I '11 not be taking a seat again.
It 's wearin' late, an' we 're frettin'
to be on the move. Me brothers de-
sires me to say, Hannah Jack, that we
have consithered ye, an' ye 're an on-
common fine woman that any man may
think himself lucky to get; but we
consither ye '11 not do us. Good-even-
in' to ye, and thanky for yer oncom-
mon kindness."
Two other suitable women in the
same tract had been approved of by the
Bacach Gasta, 'Liza Jane Bohunnan,
and Sarah Bell Baskin. So to them,
also, they went in turn. 'Liza Jane
met their rigid requirements in every
way, — only, at the last moment, be-
fore they retired to exchange opinions,
she said that, as she had been used to,
she would require a drop of good tay
to be brought to her in bed in the
mornin' to rise her heart, and give her
courage to get up. That decided the
matter. Any woman that needed a
lever in the shape of strong tea in the
mornings was better left alone. So
they decided. And Richard had, once
again, to translate their decision into
palatable phrase, and deliver it.
Sarah Bell Baskin ingratiated her-
self with them ; for she carried pots,
and fed pigs and cows, and carded
wool, and brought in a creel of turf
whilst they interviewed her in snatches.
And she kneaded bread at one end of
the table, chatting them, whilst they
drank tea at the other. So, upon a
short consultation, Sarah Bell, with her
hundred-pound fortune, was accepted.
Of course, Richard had objected that
she did not look as "quate " (quiet) as
should the ideal he sought. But Peter
and Paul frowned him down. "She '11
be quate enough in throth, after we 've
taken twelve months' work out of her, "
Paul assured him.
"We've consented to have a wife
to humor ye, an' taken the divil's own
throuble to pick her for ye. If ye
don't take Sarah Bell Baskin," Peter
said, "the sorra a wife ever ye '11 see,
by our consent, if there was a hurry-
cane of them blown like hailstones
again' the doore."
"Oh, if she plaises you, she '11
plaise me," said Richard.
And so she should, after all. For
when the marriage license was procured
by the three, and brought home by the
three, Jemmy Managhan discovered
that 'twas Peter's name was therein
recorded: for Peter, having acted as
spokesman, his name was asked, and
given without thought, and entered.
"This is a nice how-d'-ye-do, " said
Peter.
"Well, we can't be goin' back an-
other seven mile journey, an' then, as
likely as not, pay for a new license,"
said Paul resignedly.
"Sure, it 's all the same," said the
magnanimous Richard.
And Peter heaved a sigh, resolved
to abide by his own blunder. And
Sarah Bell, for her part, did not mind.
She was marrying into "a good sittin'
down. "
Though, on the wedding-day, people
said the Lowrys had never been known
to go to church before, they said what
was untrue. For they had been to
church on the day they were christened.
And Paul, moreover, had gone in one
602
The Humors of Advertising.
day when Sam Coulter, the sexton, had
it opened, in hope of raising sport with
his rat-terrier.
As, whilst they were in the vestry
consulting, and getting instructed for
the ordeal, it was found a crowd of
the unregenerate ones of Knockagar
had assembled outside the church, with
the certain intention of giving the
Bachelors of Braggy a warm reception
when they should emerge, one bachelor
less, the minister advised that the wed-
ding be postponed for an hour for peace'
sake and theirs. Sarah Bell Baskin
agreed to the wisdom of this.
But Peter was in no amiable mood.
"I tell ye what it is, Sarah Bell Bas-
kin," said he; "either this merriage is
to be now or niver. If it 's to be now,
it '11 be now ; an' if it 's to be niver,
it '11 be NIVER! " Then he paused for
her decision.
"Then let it be now," said Sarah
Bell Baskin.
And by taking across the fields with
his bride, the strategical Peter disap-
pointed the rascals who, for a full hour
after, were keeping a reception warm
outside the church gate.
Richard had read Sarah Bell aright
when he said he did not consider her
"quate " enough for him. Richard
proved this experimentally. Paul dis-
covered it. Peter, alas, discovered it.
It took three days to bring it home to
them with force. Sarah Bell herself,
with the material aid of a three-legged
stool, supplied the necessary force. In
a week the peace of the Lowry house-
hold was irretrievably wrecked, and
most of the crockery ware, and the
more portable articles of furniture
also, and Richard's right arm, and
Paul's dental assortment, and poor
Peter's head.
In three weeks Sarah Bell Baskin,
leaving them her left-handed blessing,
took her hundred pounds and her de-
parture, and returned to the house of
her father.
On the night after she left, the three
brothers sat around the fire, smoking
in turn. And after a long silence Pe-
ter spoke. He was severely looking at
Richard, who cowered. Peter said, —
"Now, that chapture 's over an'
done with (from the depth o' me sowl
God be thankit!); an' let us hope — •
let us hope we '11 niver again hear an-
other such schame."
"Niver!" said Paul emphatically.
" Niver, we hope ! " and he gazed at
Richard with a sidelong look of scath-
ing rebuke.
Poor Richard looked into the fire
and heaved a sigh.
Uncomplainingly he again took up
his household duties next morning.
And though, henceforth, one of them
was a grass widower, they still carried
their old title of the Bachelors of
Braggy.
Seumas MacManus.
THE HUMORS OF ADVERTISING.
MY friend, Antonio Ciccone, the emi-
nent confettatore of Little Italy, used of-
ten to invite me to put his picture in the
paper. " You put peech in pape," he
would cry. " Beega peech ! Senda man,
beega machine. You say, ' Antonio
Ciccone, molto religiose, molto caritate-
vole, besta man.' " And by this I know
Antonio for a very perfect advertiser
— of that grandest type, the Homeric.
He had the splendid Greek conception
of the route to reputation ; instead of
suffering the world to pronounce upon
his merits, he would pronounce upon
them himself. He no more craved to
see himself as others saw him than did
The Humors of Advertising.
603
Achilles ; like Achilles, he desired only
that others might see him somewhat as
he saw himself.
Now I confess that I have loved An-
tonio for the boasts he has made. Many
a man, finding himself no whit less great
than that charming modern ancient of
Little Italy, is nevertheless so grievously
hemmed in by the caution of his convic-
tions, that he garbs his pride in the staid
habiliments of modesty. Such may be
dear good souls, and fit for a thousand
things, but they will play an ill hand at
advertising. Let them learn from Cic-
cone ; also from my gifted fellow towns-
man, Mr. Joe Chappie, who, frank and
unafraid, thus buoyantly declares him-
self in the public prints : —
" Do you know Joe Chappie, — the boy
who came out of the West almost penni-
less, and has built up a National maga-
zine ? Do you know Joe Chappie, — the
man who gained his knowledge of human
nature on the bumpers of freight trains ;
trading an old gray horse for his first
printing-press ; a printer's devil at twelve,
an editor at sixteen, — through all phases
of social life, up to an invited guest on
presidential trains, and as special repre-
sentative at the Coronation in Westmin-
ster Abbey? Presidents, Members of
the Cabinet, Supreme Court Judges, Dip-
lomats, United States Senators, Congress-
men, and Governors know Joe Chappie.
They speak of his work, — and they write
for his magazine when no other publica-
tion on earth can entice them. It is n't
because Chappie is brilliant that he has
won this national reputation for himself
and his magazine, — it 's his quaint origi-
nality, his homelike, wholesome good-
nature that permeates all he writes.
There 's nothing published to-day like
The National Magazine — because there
is no one just like Joe Chappie."
Over and over I have conned that ra-
diant advertisement, and my merriment,
I own, has been not unmingled with
envy. I have, perhaps, rather more dis-
cretion than Mr. Joe Chappie, but less
than a tithe of his valor. Himself he
sings, myself I dare not sing. And again
I am put to shame by the illustrious
English confectioner, who, having trod-
den the summits of conscious success, ex-
claims, " I am the Toffee King ! I have
given to England a great national candy,
and I am now offering to America the
same Toffee that has made me so fa-
mous abroad. Does America propose to
welcome me, — to welcome a candy that
is so pure that any mother can recom-
mend it to her child ? The answer is,
' Yes, by all means ! " As further,
though scarce clearer, evidence of the
Homeric temper, both Mr. Chappie and
the Toffee King have achieved the glow-
ing ideal of Antonio Ciccone : they have
" peech in pape."
Yet I would not be misunderstood;
I bring no slenderest charge of vanity
against those valiant modern Hellenes.
Pasteur accepted learned degrees and
decorations, not as honors to himself,
but as tributes to his beloved France ;
and thus devotedly, beyond doubt, do
Mr. Chappie and the Toffee King lay
their laurels upon the respective altars
of their very worthy enterprises. For
what work comes to its fullest and best
in this faithless world of ours, if it be
not haloed round with the splendor of a
commanding personality ? The worker
is — or so men fancy — the measure and
the limit of the work. Magnify the
worker, and in so doing you magnify
the work. Look where you will, you
shall find the producer acquiring what
luminosity he can, that the product may
thence take profit. Does he paint ? He
capriciously dyes his white hair black,
save one lock only, which he ties with a
jaunty ribbon ; he hales unappreciative
critics to court ; seeing a picture called
Carnation, Lily — Lily, Rose, he ex-
claims, " Darnation silly, silly pose," —
a quotable saying, if you stop to think
of it ; and the fame of that painter, go-
ing out through all the earth, adds to
high art the fine resonance of personal
604
The Humors of Advertising.
notoriety. Men laugh, but they buy.
Has he a realm to rule, — a realm made
up of many petty kingdoms, each vain
in its own conceit? He declaims the
mediaeval doctrine of " divine right,"
claps scoffers in jail, and — thanks to a
long-drawn process of audacious and fan-
tastic meddling with literature, art, mu-
sic, the drama, surgery, yachting, and
theology — quite dims the effulgence of
local princelings by becoming incompa-
rably the most talked-of individual in all
his empire. Men laugh, but they yield.
Has he books to sell? Assuming the
cast mantle of a famous craftsman, the
name of a jovial monk, the unshorn locks
of a poet, and the tripod of an oracle, he
preaches a new and strange gospel, and
with unquestionable good taste permits
the portrait of his son, "food, princi-
pally grape-nuts," to be printed as an
advertisement, which, of course, is just
what Fra Pandolf, or the elder Kean,
or the Cumsean Sibyl, or the lamented
William Morris himself would have done.
Men laugh, but they buy. There 's money
in personality, be it never so whimsical,
and to that blazing star the commercial
go-cart may very prudently be hitched.
Madame Yale, the brilliant lecturer; Max
Rdgis, the bold, bad duelist ; John Alex-
ander Dowie, the reincarnated prophet,
— these and a thousand others have
grasped the blessed truth that personal
publicity can be minted, with only the
slightest difficulty, into pecuniary suc-
cess. " Peech in pape " is pelf in purse.
And yet, for obvious reasons, the most
delicious type of personal advertising, the
matrimonial, unfortunately denies the
" pape " the " peech." Oh, for a single
photographic glimpse of the little lady of
Yokohama who thus lyrically declares
herself : —
" I am a beautiful woman. My abun-
dant, undulating hair envelopes me as a
cloud. Supple as a willow is my waist.
Soft and brilliant is my visage as the
satin of the flowers. I am endowed with
wealth sufficient to saunter through life
hand in hand with my beloved. Were I
to meet a gracious lord, kindly, intelli-
gent, well educated, and of good taste, I
would unite myself with him for life,
and later share with him the pleasure of
being laid to rest eternal in a tomb of
pink marble."
But methinks — and this I say be-
cause I have seen the hill-town folk of
New England elaborately gulled through
nibbling at matrimonial advertisements
— the almond-eyed enchantress was per-
haps a wee trifle less charming in person
than in pretense. Great Homer nods, at
times ; also the Homeric advertiser.
But to brandish testimonials, with por-
traits of important witnesses, and thus to
" let another praise thee and not thine
own mouth," is ingeniously to remove
the discussion from the Homeric, or po-
etic, to the Aristotelian, or logical, realm.
One's " loving friends " — for, and in
consideration of, value received — stand
forth as witnesses. When Mr. W. T.
Stead, fresh from his advocacy of Mr.
Wilde the astrologer, proclaims Mr. Pel-
man, the mender of memories, a noble
" benefactor of the human race," or when
a " cousin of Wm. J. Bryan " proves, by
the healthful lustre of his photograph,
that Tierney's Tiny Tablets have made
him whole, the great purpose is quite sat-
isfactorily attained, and meanwhile Citi-
zens Pelman, Wilde, and Tierney have
lost nothing of their reputation for modest
stillness and humility. This ingenious
cat's-paw device plucks many a precious
chestnut out of the fire ; to quote a single
commodity, the sale of proprietary medi-
cines is directly proportionate to the
quantity and blatancy of the advertising
they get, which proves the effectiveness
of testimonials to a nicety. Moreover —
and this, I grieve to say, is a point most
advertisers overlook — the testimonial
admits of almost infinite adaptation. For
instance, when President Harper, in an
admirably sane and tempered address,
observes that students successfully pre-
pared for college by correspondence in-
The Humors of Advertising.
605
stitutes are invariably possessed of cour-
age and application, that deliverance of
his is jubilantly pounced upon by a dozen
correspondence schools of the baser sort
(imagine an institution, which, in crying
up its course in the art of conversation,
says, "You admire the party who you
hear spoken of as ' Don't he use elegant
language ? ' "), and, by a skillful derange-
ment of context, the original dictum be-
comes President Harper's avowal that
nothing short of pedagogical absent treat-
ment can possibly inculcate courage and
application ! And when an insatiable
moral reformer once so far divested him-
self of prudence as to call a certain
vaudeville theatre " absolutely above re-
proach, — clean, wholesome, uplifting,"
the theatrical proprietor, with a delicate
appreciation of commercial values, had
the reformer's benediction quite exqui-
sitely engrossed and framed and hung up
in the foyer of his theatre ; and from
that very day diverged from the paths
of rectitude. Truly a blithe situation :
within, a jubilee of vanities, — without, a
certificate of ethical impeccability ! And
again, I have seen a reverend apostle of
temperance mischievously trapped into
indorsing a patent medicine chiefly com-
pounded of spirits of wine. Indeed, this
whole business of sponsoring other men's
goods should be carefully marked with
bell-buoys, which night and day should
cry, " Shoal — 'ware shoal ! "
But I find that a piinted testimonial,
even when got by fair means and em-
ployed with good conscience, neverthe-
less lacks the convincing fervor of viva
voce pleadings. And the spoken word,
to persuade, need not fully convince. I
think it was Sainte-Beuve who said of
Lacordaire's preaching, " Though it fails
to convince, it does a better thing ; it
charms." And the Lacordaire of adver-
tising is the sweetly persuasive "barker."
When such an one cries, " Right inside,
gepmen — see the royal Bengal tiger —
fifteen feet from the tip of his nose to the
tip of his tail — fifteen feet from the tip
of his tail to the tip of his nose — mak-
ing in all the e-normious length of forty
feet — only ten cents, gepmen, the tenth
part of a dollar," I tarry not long at the
gate. But when, on the other hand, a uni-
formed Ethiopian — barking not gently,
as befits so tender a matter, but brazenly,
bluntly, and without joy in his barking
— hales me into Black's Dental Parlors,
I cannot overmaster a certain vague
shrinking of spirit. The appeal lacks
charm, whereas even forceps and rubber
dam may, by a subtler and more delicate
order of barking, be made absolutely
alluring. In England, where this deli-
cate art has come to its finest flower, a
dentist secretly hires a viscount to com-
mend him to his friends, thus adorning
the abhorred service with the dignity of
illustrious patronage and the seductive-
ness of sympathetic suggestion ; for a
viscount will bark you as gently as any
sucking dove.
Sometimes, however, you may drive
squarely at the point, and, without re-
course to self-laudation or purchased
praises, offer the susceptible public a
tempting taste of your wares. This, the
empirical method, jumps with the modern
scientific tendency. Ethically, also, it un-
failingly commends itself, for " Sample
bottle free " bespeaks plain dealing. Nor
is this all. The open cages of the circus
parade will most exquisitely tantalize the
zoological passions ; and appetizing ex-
tracts, gratuitously published, whet in-
terest in a forthcoming work of humor.
Thus I read, " ' We 're an honest people,'
said Mr. Hennessy. ' We are,' said Mr.
Dooley, ' but we don't know it ; ' " or
again, " Once upon a time there was a
Brilliant but Unappreciated Chap who
was such a Thorough Bohemian that
Strangers usually mistook him for a
Tramp. Every Evening he ate an imi-
tation Dinner, at a forty-cent Table
d'Hote, with a Bottle of Writing Fluid
thrown in," — and two new volumes
(without which no gentleman's library is
complete) appear forthwith upon my
606
The Humors of Advertising.
bookshelf. When Artemus Ward, then
wholly unknown, papered Boston with
handbills, which, without mention of time
or place, said simply, "A. Ward Will
Speak a Piece," and when, later in his ca-
reer, his poster proclaimed " A. WARD
HAS LECTURED BEFORE THE
CROWNED HEADS OF EUROPE
ever thought of lecturing," he gave, SO to Speak,
an earnest of levity. Out in Cleveland,
the curator of an historical museum, call-
ing my attention to an antiquated desk
and chair, said, " Those pieces of fur-
niture, sir, once belonged to Charles
Browne, known to the world as Artemus
Ward. Lacked balance ! " So he did —
thank God ! — but not as an advertiser.
Now from the ridiculous to the sub-
lime 't is many a step, and it is not with-
out a momentary shock to my finer sen-
sibilities that I find the solemn and awful
melodrama of " Red-Handed Bill, the
Hair Lifter of the Far South- West "
adapting to its blood-curdling purposes
the frivolous advertising methods in-
vented by an " exhibitor of fine wax-
works and 3 moral bears." The pro-
moter of melodrama publishes a synopsis
of the impending " sensational represen-
tation," thus scattering, as it were, a
largess of shudders, which, for generos-
ity at least, fully equals Ward's largess
of laughter. Read here the synopsis,
and tremble ! " Act I. A Mountain
Pass in the Rockies. In pursuit. Kate
saved by the Cattle King. The assault
of Red-Handed Bill and his Brazen Ban-
dits. ' Avaunt ! This lady is under my
protection.' Act II. Golden Gulch and
exterior of the Bucket of Blood Saloon.
The rustic lover. Bob accused of horse
stealing. The struggle and capture of
the Cattle King. ' Coward, I '11 do
for you yet ! ' Act III. A Mountain
Gorge. The captives. Preparing for
death. The equine friend to the rescue
of his master. ' Saved ! ' Act IV.
Scene 1. Don Pedro's Ranch. Red-
Handed Bill's Visit. The attack.
Scene 2. Bob and the Irishman. ' An
eye for an eye.' Scene 3. Interior of
the Bucket of Blood» Saloon. Playing
for high stakes. ' Come and take them
if you dare ! ' Act V. Scene 1. Inte-
rior of Don Pedro's Ranch, Red-Handed
Bill and Barney. Scene 2. Heart of
the Rockies. The marriage ceremony.
Terrific knife fight on horseback be-
tween Red-Handed Bill and Nebraska
Jim. « At last ! ' Act VI. Parlor in
Don Pedro's Ranch. The threat. Time-
ly arrival of the Cattle King. Carlot-
ta's confession. Bob and Kate happy."
And, as if this were not enough, the pro-
moter of melodramas declares that " the
breakage of costly bricabrac during the
fight in the Bucket of Blood Saloon
makes a weekly expense equal to the en-
tire salary list of some companies."
In advertising wild animal shows,
where one's animals are too few to per-
mit the open-cage extravagance, and the
admission fee outweighs a barker's per-
suasiveness, still creepier pronunciamen-
tos are desirable. You remember Mr.
Janvier's story, A Consolate Giantess,
and how the lady — widowed, again
widowed, and then widowed twice more,
and for the fourth time remarried —
cried, " Ah, if our Neron would again
eat a man ! " When at last the good
Giantess could announce " the terrible
man-eating lion, Neron, who has de-
voured five men," all was indeed well.
In fact, in enterprises of this character,
no other sort of advertising will long
serve. When Bostock's animal show
first came to the Pan-American Exposi-
tion, its passionate press agent inserted
a " want " in the Buffalo papers, shriek-
ing for "fifty mules, quick, to feed the
lions." This drew its thousands. Where-
upon the press agent, quite losing his
head, advertised for " fifty tons of rags
to feed the elephants," and was there-
upon discharged. Which teaches us
how perilous is any departure from the
classic, which is the sanguinary, or
pseudo-sanguinary, method of crying up
menageries.
The Humors of Advertising.
607
But, however effectual the sample bot-
tle, the sample joke, and the sample
shudder, I can show you a yet more ex-
cellent device. Depreciate your wares.
Learn from the Tennessee innkeeper
who described his establishment as " not
the largest hotel in the burg ; not newly
furnished throughout ; no free 'bus to
trains ; not the best grub the market af-
fords ; but simply clean beds and good
food. 25 cents a sleep, 25 cents an eat.
Toothpicks and ice water thrown in.
Try us ! Pay up ! And if not satisfied
keep mum." Or emulate the New Jer-
sey husbandman who declared, " Owing
to ill health, I will sell one blush rasp-
berry cow, aged eight years. She is of
undaunted courage and gives milk freely.
To a man who does not fear death in
any form, she would be a great boon.
I would rather sell her to a non-resident
of the county." Or again, wisely imi-
tate the New York tapster who set above
his door the superscription, " Road to
Hell." By thus quietly assuming that
success can in no wise be scared off the
premises, you shall certainly outvie your
loud-boasting competitors. Besides, you
will deal exclusively with men of valor,
which, in these soft times, is a rare
enough privilege.
Do you lack the fortitude to denounce
your wares ? There are those who will
cheerfully relieve you of that responsi-
bility. Forbid them not. Detraction
has proved a Golconda to Mr. Richard
Harding Davis. " Near-food " sells fast-
er, and. the "Dope-Lovers' Library"
gains new subscribers, as a result of Mr.
Dooley's merry jibes. Life, condemning
the automobile in a hundred cartoons,
becomes an incomparable advertising
medium for the most homicidal of motor-
vehicles. Many a public man would give
his weight in radium for a " roast " in
the New York Sun. To be talked about,
— that is the requisite, — and it matters
little whether the talk be kind or cruel.
P. T. Barnum appreciated this when,
without the faintest intention of carrying
out the fearful threat, he let it be whis-
pered that he was about to buy Shake-
speare's house and bundle it off to Amer-
ica. " Shameless desecration ! " howled
the press, — which was precisely what
Barnum wanted. Without spending a
dollar, he secured hundreds of " reading
notices," in "first-class position," and
focused the lively attention of every Eng-
lish or American reader upon himself
and his business.
And if it takes grit to invite abuse,
why, bless you, so does all good adver-
tising. Only an unconquerable soul will
write upon his finished product. " I con-
sider this magazine absolutely perfect ;
had I spent a million dollars, I could
not have achieved anything more splen-
did." For we have here, you see, the
didactic *' ad," in which the advertiser,
fearlessly exalting himself above his pub-
lic, tells it what 's what. Thus the ven-
der of " near-food " declares, " What
you eat, you are. Be wise in time."
And many a self-appointed arbiter of
taste announces a full line of " art "
chairs, " art " glass, " art " bicycles, and
I know not what other objets d'art, —
" art " catalogue free on application.
Nor could Ruskin, even in his most au-
tocratic mood, have rivaled the proprie-
tor of the frying-pan clock, who pro-
nounces, with an air of sublime finality,
" The keynote of modern interior deco-
ration is simplicity — be sure you strike
it when you furnish your ' den.' One of
the most pleasing and interesting adorn-
ments for your ' den ' is our Frying-Pan
Clock. Made from a real frying-pan.
Bow of ribbon, any color." Here, I
observe, is a very brave man, and the
brave, you will find, have ever at their
heels a train of timid folk, who relish
commands. It is sweet to obey, sweet
to obey without question. Dogma, tra-
dition, authority, — upon these founda-
tions men have built religions, philoso-
phies, and governments ; what wonder,
then, that when the valiant didactic ad-
vertiser essays to lead the world by the
608
The Humors of Advertising.
nose, space bristles with willing noses !
And yet I can show you another law,
the law called protest, which, though
rarer, plays a part not less significant
than that taken by obedience. Rome
has its Luther, philosophy its Hume, gov-
ernment its Emma Goldman, the didac-
tic " ad " its brood of unconvinced re-
calcitrants. Problem : to wheedle such.
Now a well-pleased man yields soon-
est to coaxing. And it happens that
pleasure awakened by an utterly irrele-
vant matter sheds its radiance over the
business in hand. Many a wight gets
monstrously cheated by sealing a bar-
gain at dinner. Indeed, I remember a
charming Bohemian caf 6 where I myself
was once thus undone. The soft glow
of the lights, the scores of merry faces,
the tinkle of a tiny orchestra, and the
courses of dainties on dainties, — these
argued nothing, yet argued all. To con-
quer the unconvinced recalcitrant, mel-
low his mood. And in the rural districts
a show does as well as a dinner. Hence
the "medicine company," with its in-
genious employment of music and the
drama to create an atmosphere in which
proprietary remedies, heartily eulogized
by a lecturer, will sell to advantage.
They say the medicine company has
seen its day. Believe them not. The
New York Clipper still chronicles its tri-
umphs : witness this cheerful report by
Dr. Wood Leigh. "I opened my Win-
ter Medicine Show in Illinois, Oct. 3,
carrying five people, and the show is
taking big. Dick Doble, in song and
dance, is a success ; Mme. Leigh, in ser-
pentine dances, was a strong feature.
Had to stop taking money at the door
at 7.40 on her night. Walter Whitley
in contortion, rings and traps, hit them
right ; Will May, descriptive singer and
monologue, was excellent." Also the
following : " Roster and Notes from the
German Medicine Co. — Joe Sower, man-
ager ; William Herbert, black face come-
dian, marionettes and magic ; Lew Ro-
sare, contortionist ; Prof. F. E. Miller,
spirit cabinet, handcuff act and silly kid
piano player; Joe Sower, Irish and
Dutch act ; Mrs. Sower, treasurer, and
Baby Pauline, ballads. We play to
S. R. O. nightly." Here, then, you be-
hold the Muses Nine conspiring with
.ZEsculapius in a device known to ethical
philosophers as the Little Game.
Failing dinners and shows — which,
alas, come high! — the Little Game
takes the less costly form of humor.
And, from the economic viewpoint, it
waives the implied paradox and takes
its humor seriously. A joke may find
him who a sermon flies ; for the mirthful
advertisement outflanks logic by creating
a milieu hypnotically conducive to com-
mercial exchange. Truly, were Sunny
Jim to convert the nine gowned justices,
stern reasoners though they be, into regu-
lar purchasers of Force, I should not so
much as blink ; for Force is a jovial name.
Uneeda Biscuit become only the more
negotiable under so whimsical a sobri-
quet ; and " Prof. Lawrence, tonsorial ar-
tist, cranial manipulator, and capillature
abridger," gets trade in plenty. So does
the London publican, who calls his inn
" The Swallow." There 's a mischievous
winsomeness, too, in the Preacher Cigar,
the Three Nuns Cigarettes, and — save
the mark ! — St. Mary's Distillery. So
it comes about that whoso hits on a
clever name sits exalted among the gods
of his personal Pantheon. But a most
obliging divinity I find him, and ever
ready to disclose the intellectual pro-
cesses whereby he achieved his triumph.
Poe has told how he wrote The Raven,
Kipling, how he composed his Reces-
sional; and with equal appropriateness
the rat-poison man consents to lay bare
his heart. Having traced the conception
and realization of a great hope, he comes
at last to the question of nomenclature.
" That was the rub. I wrestled with
that problem for several days and nights.
One night, after working over it till well-
nigh morning, I got tired and gave it up.
But I said aloud to myself, ' Well, what
The Humors of Advertising.
609
ever I call it in the end, it certainly is
" Rough on Rats." ' It struck me like a
flash — that this expression was the win-
ning name, and in ten minutes I was
out on the floor, executing a war dance
to the refrain, ' Rats, Rats, Rough on
Rats, Hang Your Dogs, and Drown Your
Cats.' " Dear, good Mother Eddy, it
seems, had a somewhat similar experi-
ence. " Six weeks," she declares, " I
waited on God to suggest a name for the
book I had been writing. Its title, Sci-
ence and Health, came to me in the
silence of the night, when the steadfast
stars watched over the world — when
slumber had fled — and I rose and re-
corded the hallowed suggestion. The
following day I showed it to my literary
friends, who advised me to drop both
the book and the title. To this, how-
ever, I gave no heed."
Thus it befalls that a rather dismal joke
becomes little short of the magnificent
when viewed from the standpoint of its
author. And, after all, the jester should
of right be merrier than his merriest
jests, — or, at least, when one comes to
think of it, such is generally the case, —
and a defenseless world must learn to
make the best of it. To subject a humor-
ous advertisement to cold criticism is to
spoil the fun. The real jocularity is not
in the advertisement, but in the adver-
tiser. The photographer who exclaims,
" Bring on your dear little babies ; if
they don't sit still I won't get mad, for
I was a baby once myself," is funnier
than his advertisement. When I read,
Save your time and save your pelf,
Save your temper, shave yourself,
I chuckle. Is the rhyme, then, so clever ?
No, I can quote you a whole anthology
of infinitely wittier jingles. But a razor,
which none but the bearded contemplate
without a shudder, or handle without
grave solicitude, suggests a train of
thought moving, let us say, from north
to south. And a razor-monger of so
poetical a temper as that here manifest
suggests a train of thought moving, let
VOL. xcm. — NO. 559. 39
us say, from south to north. Presto,
collision ! And I laugh, not because the
two trains meet, to the well-deserved
damage of their dignity, but rather be-
cause the smash is transparently pre-
meditated ; which bespeaks jocularity
where least expected. Likewise I trea-
sure the spirited lines : - —
Mary had a little lamb ;
Its fleece was white as snow,
For every morning with Truth Soap
She washed him, don't you know ?
Now Mary never boiled the lamb.
She merely let him soak
In soap and water over night,
And rinsed him when he woke.
This, I have sometimes dared think,
almost equals the German professor's
prescription of an infallible test for the
temperature of the baby's bath : " Put
the baby in the water ; if he turns red,
it 's too warm ; if he turns blue, it 's too
cold." For the notion of a woolly little
lamb put sorrowfully to bed in a wash-
tub appeals quite powerfully to one's
sense of the pathetic, and pathos adds
ever a certain wicked zest to the humor-
ous. And yet the fine flavor of this
quaint advertisement lies chiefly, I
think, in the unexpected oddity where-
with a most respectable nursery rhyme
is perverted and elaborated to suit the
exigencies of the soap trade. Twist and
distort the familiar, till art-for-art's-sake
becomes art-for-advertising's-sake, and
you perpetrate a highly jovial crime.
Thus a facsimile of the cover design of
Confessions of a Wife attracts my
vagrant eye to what looks for all the
world like an extract from that most
delirious of novels : " To-morrow is our
wedding day, and I have a surprise for
Dana. ... I can see him sometimes
looking wistfully at his soiled left hand.
. . . Dana has grown so patient and
gentle that it frightens me. . . . When
he swears and throws the soap around
the room my spirits are quite good — it is
not natural for Dana to be patient. . . .
Cleanliness has its price as well as love,
610
The Humors of Advertising.
and it seems as if in this struggle with
common soaps he paid the cost of his
cleanliness from the treasury of his life.
... I have got a cake of Hand Sapolio
for Dana."
These charming parodies seem to me
so ingratiating, and their gratuitous pub-
lication indicates so fine a geniality, that
I find myself quite amiably disposed
toward the advertisers who have put
them forth. This is what the advertisers
wanted, and I perceive, not without a
modicum of personal satisfaction, that
verily they have their reward. They de-
serve it. For art is long, and successful
humor the longest and toughest of arts.
I have known many jokers, but few
jokes. And so I am hardly surprised to
find a distinguished authority counseling
advertisers to walk wide of the jocose
advertisement. Says he, " The man who
has no sense of humor can never see the
point of a humorous ad, while there is
every reason for believing that the man
who has a sense of humor is connoisseur
enough to select choicer food for it than
that afforded in the humorous ad." But
jocosity will out, and the comic adver-
tisement has come to stay. And as
humor is rare, especially in America
(for what other nation in Christendom
would relish Mrs. Wiggs of the Cab-
bage Patch?), the advertiser accord-
ingly addresses himself, with notorious
success and unquestioned profit, to the
humor of the humorless. Watch the
passengers in the trolley car. They are
delightedly absorbing its frieze of obvi-
ous comicalities, and with my hand on
my heart I declare there never were
more fatuous jingles, never more vapid
absurdities, never more limping attempts
at wit. This is just as it should be. For
a single disgruntled beholder — like
yourself, gentle reader — there are thou-
sands on thousands who proudly imagine
themselves amused.
" Humor," says Mr. Crothers, " is the
frank enjoyment of the imperfect." Yes,
but not of imperfect fun. And I find
the advertiser most deliciously amusing
when he least aspires to be ; I frankly
enjoy his laughterless and unconscious
imperfections. " Miss Ellen Terry will
positively appear in three pieces," writes
he ; or " Try our patent lamp-chimney
and save half your light ; " or even,
" Our fish cannot be approached." A
correspondence school of advertising
declares in its enthusiastic prospectus,
" You will never see the ad writer play
the wall-flower in society ; " and, good
lack, why should he ? I will pledge my
all to find admirers for any author of
unwittingly humorous advertisements.
Indeed, I dare say Mr. Crothers himself
would be proud to fellowship with such
an one, and " frankly enjoy his imper-
fections," though methinks he would per-
haps reserve the right to order his own
affairs without assistance from so devi-
ous and humorless an intellect. I recall
a noted clergyman who, when promoting
the American lectures of a touring Brit-
ish dean, sought counsel of a professional
advertiser. " Get a strong list of patron-
esses," said his confident Mentor, " and
I '11 do the rest." So the churchman
spent some seven laborious days ringing
just the right doorbells, and thus secured
the sponsorship of the good and great.
The advertiser spent seven days, also,
contriving a suitable sensation. Without
waiting on clerical approval — for what
do the clergy know of these mundane
matters ? — he posted ten thousand cir-
culars, each bearing the impressive ros-
ter of fashionable patronesses, and each
superscribed in monstrous letters (as be-
fitted the intellectual dimensions of the
reverend lecturer) —
COME and HEAR a
RARE EN&?SH DEAN!
The touring dean, like the king in the
ancient chronicle, waxed " wonderly
wroth ; " so did the fashionable patron-
esses ; so, in consequence, did the trust
ful clergyman, who for many a day had
to bide his light under a bushel. But the
The Humors of Advertising.
611
advertising specialist stood by his guns.
He had brought the dean's lecture to
a happy issue, packed the auditorium,
minted a snug and glittering little for-
tune. For his well-aimed gaucherie had
set the whole town babbling, and the
social cataclysm and its resultant uproar
had converted the hideous proclamation
into that best of advertisements, the
self-repeater.
When I turn advertiser, I shall ven-
ture on nothing but self-repeaters. I
shall uniformly advertise my deans after
that perilous but remunerative fashion ;
indeed, I shall even emulate the Girl
with the Auburn Hair, from whom I
one day received a very pretty missive,
which, written in a delicate feminine
hand, on irreproachable note-paper, thus
tactfully invited consideration : —
DEAR MR. HARTT, — As I never
asked a favor of you before in all my
life, I feel free to ask one now. Please
have the goodness to meet me at the
stage entrance of Shea's Garden Theatre
at eight o'clock any evening next week.
Wear a pink carnation in your button-
hole, so I shall know you. Don't tell
any one except your wife and family.
Sincerely yours,
THE GIRL WITH THE AUBURN HAIR.
As every man in town, or at least
every man in the address book, had been
honored with a similar brochure, just
imagine the hubbub ! I am not aware
that innumerable multitudes assembled,
carnation-bedecked, at the stage entrance
of Shea's Garden Theatre, but I have it
for truth that the Girl with the Auburn
Hair sang to vast and highly expectant
audiences. She had made every man of
us her herald.
And so it chances that many a com-
mercial proclamation leaps from the ad-
vertising column to the realm of popu-
lar humor, and is there repeated free of
cost. A proletarian vaudeville audience
will laugh at the merest mention of
Heinz's pickles or Dr. Munyon's inhaler.
In A Chinese Honeymoon, Miss Toby
Claude, with a marvelous horizontal pig-
tail, becomes, in the lines assigned to the
leading comedian, " Sunny Jim's sister,"
— and the joke, so profitable to the man-
ufacturers of Force, brings a burst of
uncontrollable merriment. A newspa-
per jokesmith contrives that Mrs. Mc-
Bride shall say, " I can't cokx my hus-
band to eat any breakfast ; " to which
Mrs. Oldwife rejoins, " Have you tried
Force ? " Whereupon Mrs. McBride
exclaims, " Madam, you don't know my
husband ! " All my advertisements, I
have determined, must thus reverber-
ate.
Better yet, I am fixed upon it that
whenever possible, they shall go capped
and gowned in academic dignity. I re-
member a little affair that occurred some
years ago at a venerable New England
College. It was Commencement Day.
A brilliant audience had assembled. On
the platform sat the distinguished Facul-
ty and trustees of that ancient institution
of learning. Several youthful orators
had successively striven for appreciation,
till at last appeared the putative candi-
date for the prize " for the best appear-
ance on the Commencement stage." A
handsome lad he was, and a really im-
pressive figure as he strode across the
platform in his flowing Oxford gown.
He bowed smilingly, and then said with
radiant amiability, " Good - morning !
Have you used Pears' Soap ? " With
that he paused — seconds, but hours it
seemed — while a shudder of scandal-
ized horror ran through us all. I could
have sunk into the very depths of the
earth. The learned Faculty were beside
themselves with mingled rage and mor-
tification. The audience gasped. But
after the dreadful pause came the ring-
ing exclamation, " This is the advertise-
ment that stares us in the face, turn
where we will ! Do you read the adver-
tisements in the daily papers ? You
ought to." And then followed an elo-
612
The Humors of Advertising.
quent address on the Economics of Ad-
vertising, — an address so vigorous and
sane and convincing, and delivered with
such ardor and measure, that the terrible
youth covered himself with honor, and
triumphantly bore away the prize. There
you had a self -repeater worth talking
about.
Such, then, as I view these pleasant
interests, are the humors of advertising.
I am advised, however, that some,
Charles Dickens among them, prescribe
an attitude less frivolous than mine to-
ward so solemn a thing as the printed
advertisement. Says Dickens, " The
advertisements which appear in a public
journal take rank among the most signi-
ficant indications of the state of socie-
ty of that time and place." Which is
literally true of this singular brochure
in the Dyersburg, Tennessee, Gazette :
" LOST — A HOUSE.
" On Tuesday, March 16, my dwell-
ing-house, thirteen miles above Caruth-
ersville, was washed from its foundation
and floated down the Mississippi River.
It is a new two-story frame, painted
white and built in T shape, with a hall
in the centre, and a two-story front porch
all the way across the building. It con-
tained all my household and kitchen
furniture, including an organ with J. C.
engraved on the plate. The cook stove
is an old-fashion No. 8 range. A Mar-
lin rifle, sixteen-shot, 38-calibre, was also
in the house. Any one knowing the
whereabouts of this house will be re-
warded by informing me at this place."
Here, beyond doubt, you have an accu-
rate picture of life in Dyersburg, Tennes-
see. The advertisement thus becomes
material for the sociologist, and if this
be sociology let us make the most of it !
" The most truthful part of a newspa-
per," says Thomas Jefferson, " is the
advertisements." When, therefore, I
read, " Come and see the Human Suicide :
he kills himself every fifteen minutes,"
or " A bottle of Italian air (price one
dollar) will make you sing like Patti in
her early days," I have doubtless enlarged
my personal sapiency by peacefully an-
nexing an indisputable fact. Neverthe-
less, so ill-poised is my solemnity that,
even when thus handsomely enriched, I
laugh in the face of my new acquisition.
Yet a kindly laugh it is, — with charity
for all, and with malice toward none.
Indeed, he were a sad sort of Chris-
tian, who, stalking abroad through the
sunny realna of public advertising, could
fail to be warmed by its humors. For,
despite their conscious or unconscious
grotesquerie, they bespeak the Pauline
virtues of faith, hope, and love : faith in
the omnipotence of the advertisement ;
hope writ large in a splendid commercial
optimism ; love, singing ever of noble
disinterestedness. And the greatest of
these is love. Fortunes in mining
stocks, health and long life in unfailing
pills and potions, wisdom by mail or in
packages of breakfast food, the trap-
pings of splendor for only a tithe of
their value, — these, and a hundred other
precious things, are fairly pelted at a be-
loved public, to the apparent ruin of its
benefactors. Even the advertising of
this vast and profoundly altruistic sacri-
fice costs millions of dollars. And the
pretty point of it is, the advertisers, such
is the joy with which an approving Pro-
vidence beholds their self-forgetfulness,
get rich in the process. Moreover, it is
sweet to know that, in the last analysis,
it is my money and yours that they fat-
ten on, and, by virtue of increased prices,
my money and yours that pays for their
extravagant advertising — which, me-
thinks, is the best joke of all.
Rollin Lynde Hartt.
Whippoorwill Time. 613
WHIPPOORWILL TIME.
LET down the bars ; drive in the cows ;
The west is dyed with burning rose :
Unhitch the horses from the ploughs,
And from the cart the ox that lows,
And light the lamp within the house.
The whippoorwill is calling,
" Whip-poor-will ; whip-poor-will,"
Where the locust blooms are falling
On the hill:
The sunset's rose is dying,
And the whippoorwill is crying,
" Whip-poor-will ; whip-poor-will ; "
Soft, now shrill,
The whippoorwill is crying
" Whip-poor-will."
Unloose the watch-dog from his chain :
The first stars wink their drowsy eyes
A sheep-bell tinkles in the lane,
And where the shadow deepest lies
A lamp makes bright the kitchen pane.
The whippoorwill is calling,
" Whip-poor-will ; whip-poor-will,"
Where the berry-blooms are falling
On the rill:
The first faint stars are springing,
And the whippoorwill is singing,
" Whip-poor-will ; whip-poor-will ; "
Softly still
The whippoorwill is singing,
" Whip-poor-will."
The cows are milked ; the cattle fed ;
The last far streaks of evening fade :
The farm-hand whistles in the shed,
And in the house the table 's laid ;
The lamp streams on the garden-bed.
The whippoorwill is calling,
" Whip-poor-will ; whip-poor-will,"
Where the dog-wood blooms are falling
On the hill:
The afterglow is waning,
And the whippoorwill 's complaining,
" Whip-poor-will ; whip-poor-will ; "
Wild and shrill,
The whippoorwill 's complaining,
" Whip-poor-will."
614
The Work of the Woman's Club.
The moon blooms out, a great white rose :
The stars wheel onward towards the west :
The barnyard cock wakes once and crows :
The farm is wrapped in peaceful rest :
The cricket chirs : the firefly glows.
The whippoorwill is calling,
" Whip-poor-will ; whip-poor-will,"
Where the bramble-blooms are falling
On the rill:
The moon her watch is keeping,
And the whippoorwill is weeping,
" Whip-poor-will ; whip-poor-will ; "
Lonely still,
The whippoorwill is weeping,
" Whip-poor-will."
Madison Cawein.
THE WORK OF THE WOMAN'S CLUB.
IT would be interesting to know if the
impulse to organize that first resulted in
a Woman's Club in 1868 had its basis
in any fundamental and common need
of the women of that period. That two
clubs, the New England Women's Club
of Boston, and Sorosis of New York,
were formed almost simultaneously,
would point toward such a conclusion.
That some of the leaders in the move-
ment were suffragists, that the individual
members were women who had been
intellectually quickened and trained in
practical experience by the events of the
civil war, and that the time to enjoy the
results of such organization had been
gained by the improved domestic econ-
omy, will suggest some basis for specu-
lation as to the underlying causes. The
superficial and stated reason for being,
in the constitutions of those early clubs,
was unanimously "for mutual, or gen-
eral, improvement, and to promote social
enjoyment."
With this simple and egoistic plat-
form, the club idea gained adherents
very rapidly in New England and the
Middle States. Study clubs were formed
in large cities and remote villages, each
with its encumbering constitution, and
rules of order that seemed specially de-
signed to retard the business of the day.
Outwardly, for twenty years, the wo-
man's club remained an institution for
the culture and pleasure of its members ;
but within, the desire for a larger oppor-
tunity was gradually strengthening. Par-
liamentary practice gave women confi-
dence in their ability to lead larger issues
to a successful conclusion. The inherent
longing for power, coupled with confi-
dence in the wisdom and beneficence of
whatever woman should do, brought the
leaders of the club movement to a con-
ception of social service. To effect this,
further organization was necessary. It
was then, in 1890, that a union of indi-
vidual clubs was formed into a chartered
body, known as the General Federation
of Women's Clubs. Closely following
this culmination, the women of Maine
formed the first union of the clubs of
that state into a state federation. Other
states joined in the movement, each state
federation as it organized becoming a
unit of the General Federation. There
The, Work of the Woman's Club.
615
are now represented in this body thirty-
nine states and territories and five for-
eign countries, with 3288 clubs having
a membership of about 275,000 women.
The organization of the General Fed-
eration is complete, making it possible,
given the responsible person in office, to
get immediately into touch with every
individual member. Its character is
unique ; racially heterogeneous, section-
ally widespread, theoretically of no poli-
tics, it is pledged to work for the im-
provement of its members in every line
of human culture and for all wise mea-
sures relating to human progress.
To be a member of such an organi-
zation must stimulate the imagination,
deepen the sympathies, and go a long
way toward overcoming that provincial-
ism of mind with which our country has
constantly to reckon. This subjective
work was the early endeavor of the fed-
erations ; but for eight years, since the
Biennial held in Milwaukee, and also
since the state federations found their
social consciences, the effort has been
toward the concrete issue. " Something
must be done to justify our existence,"
has been the constant cry of officers,
federation bulletins, and committee re-
ports. To see the general preparedness
to do passing on to an active doing may
well cause a certain dismay in the mind
of the onlooker.
The amused toleration that has for
long characterized the thought of those
unfortunates who were outside the club
movement is changing to a somewhat
anxious curiosity, and not without cause.
It makes little difference to the com-
munity that the club has set aside the
colored lithograph in favor of a Prera-
phaelite photograph in carbon, or that
it studiously regards the possibilities
of Hamlet's madness. Even vacation
schools and college scholarships as an
issue fail to arouse serious comment.
But when the clubs begin to appear
in legislative committee rooms, bearing
yards of signatures, and when they ques-
tion why the employees of bakeshops
are permitted to work seventy or eighty
hours a week, their potential power be-
comes a factor to be seriously consid-
ered.
The spectacle of 275,000 women splen-
didly organized, armed with leisure and
opportunity, and animated by a passion
for reform, assumes the distinction of a
" social force." Forces must be reck-
oned with, and the work and the worth of
the woman's club movement are becom-
ing important public interests.
The work of the woman's club is
threefold : to educate its members, men-
tally and morally ; to create public opin-
ion ; to secure better conditions of life.
Its worth, personal and social, is in pro-
portion to its effectiveness in securing
these ends.
The first clubs were study clubs ; all
clubs are in some degree study clubs, the
culture idea having been the most tena-
cious. The early club, and the parlor
club of to-day, would frequently devote
a season to the study of one book, or one
author, or some theory of economics or
epoch in history. Their study may not
have been either profound or judiciously
chosen, but the woman herself really be-
lieved in it, and was being as studious as
she could easily be.
The members took great interest in
naming their clubs. The heroines of
antiquity, the modern literary celebrities,
Greek words that look so simple but
mean so much, flowers of the field, all
were pressed into the significant service
of this organization.
The club members of long ago did not
bring ponderous dignity with them to
their meetings. They were gay, girlish,
and, it may be, frivolous. Their pro-
grammes and calendars reveal a school-
girl's indifference to the decorous habits
of an older society. Happily there are still
sections of our country where the presi-
dent appears in the Year Book as " Mrs.
Bob," or " Mrs. Mayme," and where the
Recording Secretary naively writes her-
616
The Work of the Woman's Club.
self "Mrs. Katie;" where the "Clio
Club" devotes the season to the study
of " Robert Louis Stevenson and of Na-
ture ; " where " Browning Clubs " read
" Shakespeare and the Magazines," and
where a " Current Events Class " studies
"The Bible."
The simple club, with its accessories of
tea and poetry, has given way to, or been
absorbed in, the Department Club, a club
that needs no distinguishing title, but is,
par excellence, the Woman's Club.
The department club has taken unto
itself the sphere of human knowledge, or,
to be specific, and according to the re-
cords of 1902, it devotes itself in general
to nine named lines of work : Literature,
Music, Art, Education, Current Topics,
Finance, Philanthropy, Household Eco-
nomics, and Social Economics. The aver-
age scope of endeavor of all the clubs of
the country is six departments to each
club, the majority undertaking five sub-
jects, and a goodly number being un-
daunted by the nine.
The theory that underlies the depart-
ment club is, that the members will natu-
rally gather around the standing com-
mittee with whose work they are in
especial sympathy, study groups being
thus formed ; while from time to time
each committee will introduce some emi-
nent person to speak to the whole club of
his specialty. Practical work will be as-
signed to the group to which it belongs,
and so all possible interests of society
will have their hospitable centre from
which community betterment will ra-
diate. That the theory is workable has
been proven by the efficient practice of
such clubs as the Cantabrigia in Massa-
chusetts, the Chicago Woman's Club, and
the Woman's Club of Denver. The com-
mon practice is far from the ideal. The
individual members do not cumulate, nor
does the standing committee radiate.
The season's work consists, instead, of
an expensive programme in which the
amusement idea is overlaid by the serious
character of the subjects presented. Few
groups of study are formed, and these are
likely to be on culture subjects. The
concrete work of the club is spasmodic,
and dependent for its performance al-
most entirely on the personnel of the
standing committee, which is annually
changing. The one permanent feature
is the lecture ; that cannot be escaped,
nor can it be related.
A succession of lectures on widely di-
vergent subjects has the effect merely of
awakening a transient emotion, buried
by the keener emotion of the next intel-
lectual opportunity. There can be no
valid objection to listening to lectures
when one is a mere listener; but the
woman's club listener has added to her
receptiveness a vague feeling that she,
by virtue of her position, must do some-
thing about it. Her passivity is aroused
into convulsive but feeble volition ; but
before she has time to respond to the
present claim, another blow has been
struck and another purpose presented,
to be vanquished in its turn by another
claimant. The indefinite process of stim-
ulation and exhaustion, without accom-
panying activity, goes on until the desper-
ate club woman listens to all causes with
equal stoicism and with mechanical in-
terest.
Quite aside from the ethical import of
the modern club lecture is its intellec-
tual appeal. Unquestionably certain lec-
tures arouse an eager desire to follow out
lines of thought. I have frequently
watched with interest the connection be-
tween the reading habit of a community,
as evinced in the call for books at the
public library, and the train of thought
inspired by the last lecturer. One day
in the poets' alcove I missed the copies
of the Odyssey and the Iliad. Their
places had not been vacant before. I
hurriedly went to the alcove where Phi-
losophy reposed. Thomas a Kempis was
not there. The last lecture at the club
had had to do with " literature and
life." The books were back in a day or
two in their accustomed places. I
The Work of the Woman s Club.
617
fancied I perceived in them a certain de-
jection, as though they had failed to meet
the expectations aroused by their eloquent
expositor. Then I remembered the Au-
dubon lecture of yesterday. Quickly I
sought Natural Science. Every book of
ornithology had disappeared. " It may
be butterflies to-morrow, but that is too
nearly related," I reflected; "it is more
likely to be ' Man's Duty to his Neigh-
bor.' "
The dubiety of thought that results
from the mixed club programme is further
complicated by the occasional mistiness
of the club vocabulary. For instance,
there is the term Social Economics. In
1902 thirty state federations and 369
clubs announced this science to be one
branch of their work. Investigation does
not reveal that the term means to any
club a particular science. On the con-
trary, it seems to be a nebulous term
covering a diversity of interests more or
less misunderstood. A certain blunting
of mental sensitiveness will result from
such inaccuracy, even if clubs escape the
criticism of intellectual dishonesty.
In a suburban car some years ago I
became interested in two ladies, in whom
I soon recognized those well-known peo-
ple, Mrs. Arrived and Mrs. Arriving.
Their conversation was an interesting
commentary on the direct intellectual
and ethical value of the woman's club.
Mrs. Arriving was directly opposite me,
and her staccato, penetrating voice com-
pelled me in this instance to be a willing
listener.
" Were you at the club yesterday ? "
she asked with a certain eagerness, as if
to bring the important subject forward
before it should be conversationally side-
tracked to make way for the regular
traffic of servants and gowns.
" No, I was too busy at home to think
of going," answered Mrs. Arrived.
" Oh, it 's too bad to let trivial things
keep you away. We had such an elevat-
ing lecture. Really, it gave me such an
uplift!"
"Indeed! I remember you were to
have Mr. O . What was his sub-
ject ? " asked Mrs. Arrived in an indul-
gent tone.
" It was Lowell. You know, the one
every one was talking about last spring.
It seemed to me that every person I
met asked me to put down my name for
a small subscription. Somebody wanted
to build a monument or do something
for him in Cambridge. If I had heard
Mr. O then, I believe I should have
given something. But it is probably just
as well. Mr. O did not say anything
about its having been done."
"What did Mr. 0 say!
Mrs.
'Did
Arrived's tone was still indulgent,
he speak of Lowell's poetry ? "
" Oh no, — at least not much. He
talked about, — let me see, I can tell
you in a minute just what his subject
was, — Lowell, the man, the American,
and the historian," answered Mrs. Ar-
riving triumphantly.
" But Lowell was not an historian,"
interrupted the other lady.
" Oh, was n't he ? How foolish ! Now
I remember. It was Lowell, the man,
the American, and the essayist. But he
said a lot about the civil war, that 's
where I got mixed up about history,"
and Mrs. Arriving's tone indicated no
confusion.
" I am very fond of Lowell's poetry,"
said Mrs. Arrived reflectively. " The
Commemoration Ode seems to me among
the noblest poetry we have produced."
" You have read it, then ! Mr. O
said something about it, and advised us
all to read it. I made up my mind that
I should just as soon as I could get it
from the library. It 's such a bother to
get a thing at once. Every one is sure to
rush for it. By the time I can get hold
of the book I have usually forgotten
what I wanted to read."
" Why don't you buy it, then ? "
" I buy books ! My goodness, my last
dressmaker's bill was three hundred dol-
lars. I guess I shan't waste any money
618
The Work of the Woman's Club.
on books as long as the public supports
a good library."
There was an eloquent pause, finally
broken by Mrs. Arrived, who asked,
"Did Mr. O refer to any other
poem, or recommend any other to your
notice ? "
" Yes, he said by all means to read the
Fable for Critics. He read some screech-
ingly funny passages from that ; and he
wanted us not to neglect Ulysses."
" Ulysses ! Lowell did not write Ulys-
ses ; that is Tennyson's." Mrs. Arrived
was evidently annoyed.
"Now I remember. I do get so
mixed up. It was Columbus ! But Mrs.
R , you know, the one whose husband
writes poetry, she said, when we were
going home, that whenever she read
Columbus, her husband made her read
Ulysses as an antidote. Was n't that a
funny thing to say ? That 's the way I
got them mixed up." Mrs. Arriving con-
tinued placidly, " I don't wonder that
I do, there is so much to think about.
Now there 's the topics of the day. You
don't go to Miss Informed's Current
Events Class, do you ? "
" No, do you ? " Mrs. Arrived ques-
tioned curtly.
" I could n't get on without it," an-
swered Mrs. Arriving. "You see, it
takes only an hour and a half once a
week. And she tells us everything
that 's going on, so I never look into a
paper, except for the deaths and teas.
I just came from there this morning.
Such an interesting morning, too ! You
know she talked about the necessity of
having a Society for the Protection of
the Motor Men from the Severe Wea-
ther. Yes, I joined. I think it is too
cruel that they should be so exposed to
the cold. I shall use all my influence,
and make my husband use his, to have
the cars vestibuled. Well, how I have
talked! Now I must get off on this
next block. You know I have to look
up a new coachman. Ours won't stay.
He got perfectly furious yesterday be-
cause he had to wait for me for an
hour."
" Well, it must have been rather hard
to sit in that storm for an hour, unpro-
tected," interposed Mrs. Arrived.
" What does one keep a coachman for ?
I guess he could stand it if the horses
could. Really, servants are getting so
delicate one hardly knows what to do.
Here 's my street. Good-by, dear, I '11
come and see you if ever I get a coach-
man who can stand the weather. Oh,
I do hope you '11 help about the motor
men. Good-by." Her last sentence was
wafted back from the platform of the
car.
I glanced involuntarily toward the
lady who remained. Our eyes met
understandingly. "The club leaves us
where it finds us," I said to her.
And she, perhaps mistakenly, an-
swered, "No, it carries us into an un-
certain knowledge that is worse than
ignorance."
To stimulate and direct public opin-
ion is a natural function of the woman's
club. Its members are curious about
local conditions, and directly interested
in the administration of civic affairs.
They have experienced in some measure
the power of organized and directed ef-
fort, and believe in the inherent right-
ness of their own theories. Lacking the
means of direct authority, they seek to
gain, by influence and persuasiveness, a
determining voice in the conduct of pub-
lic affairs. On the other hand, the fact
that there is a woman's club at all gives
evidence to the community that women
have time to give that special attention
to civic problems which is denied to
most men. Our domestic life has ap-
proximated the ideal of the ambitious
husband in Miss Jewett's story, — the
one who had realized his keenest desire,
that his wife " could set in her rocking-
chair all the afternoon and read a novel."
Because American women have this lei-
sure, the community looks to them, more
and more, to hold the sensitive plate of
The Work of the Woman's Club.
619
public welfare, and to be responsible for
the initiation of better methods and man-
ners in civic life. Women's clubs ne-
cessarily, then, find their chief scope of
altruistic work in creating public opinion.
It is of singular importance that this
should be a wise public opinion. The
leaders of the club movement are recog-
nizing this necessity, — a fact evinced
by the precautionary advice with which
they surround their plans for work. The
elimination of the tramp is the special
object of the Social Service committee of
a prominent state federation. Once he
might have been eliminated viva voce,
or by withholding his morning coffee.
But the new intelligence of organized
women demands that the case shall be
studied. Individual clubs are asked to
collect local data. They are urged to
undertake no public action without con-
sultation with the committee. The help
of able sociologists is invited, and the
•soOperation of organizations that make
a special study of the " Tramp Evil " is
secured. By these means the committee
undertakes to prevent any hasty or un-
wise action, and to supply to each com-
munity some fundamental knowledge on
which wise public opinion may be based.
As a sign of the times in the club world,
this is a significant incident. Nor is the
action of this committee isolated ; in-
stead, the same method is coming to be
adopted for each remedial measure au-
thorized by the federations. It is yet
too early to see definite, quotable results
of this plan of work in individual clubs.
Past constructive work has been too
often due to the quiescent acceptance of
whatever measures might be proposed,
rather than to their intelligent consider-
ation. Should the new leaven work, the
worth of the woman's club to a commu-
nity would be tremendously increased.
Its habits of study would be revolution-
ized. Its claim to be a " promoter of
the public welfare " would be estab-
lished.
But even without the personal en-
lightenment that counts for so much,
women's clubs have been a potent factor
in determining public opinion. As or-
ganizations, they have realized that " in
public opinion we are all legislators by
our birthright." And in practice, they
have found that they could actually legis-
late by means of this power. Legislative
work is undertaken by all the state fed-
erations, in urging and securing the
passage of laws that deal with the con-
ditions of women and children. In Mas-
sachusetts, Connecticut, and Illinois, the
state federations have promoted the pas-
sage of a bill giving joint and equal
parental guardianship to minor children.
The Juvenile Court Law has been se-
cured in California, Illinois, Maryland,
and Nebraska. The Louisiana Federa-
tion has worked successfully for the Pro-
bationary Law, and in Texas an indus-
trial school has been established. Laws
to raise the standard of public morality,
to segregate and classify defective and
delinquent classes, to secure the services
of women as factory inspectors, police
matrons, and on boards of control, are
other measures for which women's clubs
have successfully worked.
While it is difficult to determine the
degree of women's participation in this
large body of corrective legislation, care-
ful investigation proves that they were,
at least, an important single factor. In
some instances, the officers of the state
federation framed the bill and secured
the necessary guidance at every step of
its passage ; in others, petitions and pub-
lic agitation were the agencies employed.
An inland newspaper in describing the
passage of a bill, whose sponsors had
been the women's clubs, said, " It was
passed in a rush of gallantry in which
gush, good sense, and sentimentalism
were combined."
The reporter perceived a number of
the elements that have entered into the
support given by men to women's mea-
sures. And while a more elegant exposi-
tion might be made of underlying mo-
620
The Work of the Woman's Club.
tives, it is hardly possible to give one
more discriminating. Whatever the
psychical basis of their legislative influ-
ence may be, their success demonstrates
the fact that politics is possible to a non-
political body ; that a third party, with-
out vote or direct participation, may
come, in a democracy, to have a de-
termining authority in corrective legis-
lation.
Securing the passage of laws is the
extreme instance of what organized wo-
men have accomplished through the
medium of public opinion. Many other
concrete illustrations drawn from local
conditions might be given ; but they
would all serve to illustrate that the
woman's club is determining the mind
of the community in its relation to many
educational, philanthropic, and reform-
atory questions. How important, then,
becomes right thinking in the club, —
not solemn, arrogating, feminine, self-
inclusive thinking, but gay, self-forget-
ful, reflective, human thinking.
A club to which I belong at one time
concentrated its very serious efforts to
prevent the further destruction of song
birds. We interested the children in the
public schools. We argued with the
husbands and fathers, and particularly
with the bachelor sportsmen. We wrote
columns in the local paper, and succeeded
in arousing much public sympathy for
the songsters. Soon after we bought and
appeared in our new millinery. An ir-
reverent joker counted fifty aigrettes
floating from fifty new bonnets, and
proposed to our president that he come
to do a little missionary work in the club
in behalf of birds. It was fortunate for
our club that its president had a sense of
humor, else we might be still wearing
aigrettes and distributing pamphlets for
the protection of song birds.
The federation of one of the more en-
lightened states has recently undertaken
to enter the field of direct politics. I
quote the advice it gives to its constitu-
ents : —
" Before senators and representatives
are even nominated, it is very essential
that club women look up the record of
the various candidates in their districts,
and satisfy themselves as to their posi-
tion regarding women upon boards of
control of state institutions. Find out
how they voted last year. Information
will be gladly furnished by members of
this committee. Then strive to create a
sufficient public sentiment in your own
locality to defeat, at the party caucus,
any nominee known to oppose women
representatives upon Boards of Control."
It is this partial, local, and partisan type
of mind that the woman's club sup-
posedly tries to correct. That it has not
succeeded, as yet, in doing this, may be
due to the greater attention given to
objective causes than to subjective con-
ditions, or it may be an expression of the
mere femininity of the movement.
The field for constructive work in the
women's clubs — work in which they
have direct and controlling authority —
is limited. To create better conditions of
life means for them commonly to use the
indirect agencies we have been consider-
ing. In philanthropy' and public educa-
tion, they have found their chief oppor-
tunity for responsible effort, and in both
fields women's clubs have been of con-
spicuous service. They have been hos-
pitable to all forms of philanthropy,
creating, by their aggregation of non-
sectarian people, a new centre of public
beneficence. They have added fre-
quently to the educational equipment of
a community, the kindergarten, manual
training, and domestic science ; and this
not always by persuasion, but through
the establishment and support of these
branches of education, until such time
as the community should be convinced
of their usefulness and voluntarily as-
sume their responsibilities. More than
in any other way, the women's clubs
have benefited the schools by creating
better hygienic and aesthetic conditions
in school buildings and grounds. They
The, Work of the Woman's Club.
621
have made it possible for the children
to become familiar with good art, with
the beauty of cleanliness, and with the
charm of a growing vine or flower.
But it is in the work for the exten-
sion of libraries that women's clubs have
most fully demonstrated their ability to
further an educational project. Many
states in the Union have made no pro-
vision for the establishment of free
libraries, and in others, where there is
the necessary legislation, local conditions
prevent their adequate establishment.
Realizing keenly what a dearth of books
means to a community, women's clubs
have promptly initiated in many states
systems of traveling libraries to satisfy
the needs of the people until free libra-
ries could be established on a permanent
basis. In Oklahoma and Indian Terri-
tory the federation collected one thou-
sand volumes. These were classified
and divided into fifty libraries, and each
was sent on its enlightening pilgrimage.
Kansas is sending to its district schools
and remote communities 10,000 books
divided into suitable libraries. The wo-
men of Ohio circulate 900 libraries ;
Kentucky is sending sixty-four to its
mountaineers. In Maine the traveling
library has become a prized educational
opportunity. Its success has secured
the appointment of a Library Commis-
sion and the enactment of suitable li-
brary legislation. This movement is
extensive ; and as an indication of what
organized women can do, when the issue
is concrete and appealing, it is signifi-
cant. At a recent federation meeting
in Massachusetts, no orator of the day
made so eloquent an appeal as did the
neat and convenient case of good books
that invited our inspection before it
should be sent to a remote community
in the Tennessee Mountains.
Except in the two lines of work we
have just considered, women's clubs are
not zealous in undertaking to create bet-
ter conditions of life by direct and au-
thoritative measures. To many causes
they give tacit assent. A veteran club
officer said to me recently, " I am
ashamed to bring a petition before my
club ; the members will sign anything."
" But do they do everything ? " I
asked.
"No," 5 he answered, "they seem to
think that to sign a petition is tanta-
mount to securing the end desired.
Having signed, the matter is closed so
far as they personally are concerned."
An instance which will illustrate this
curious personal apathy toward causes
that are furthered by the federations,
and to which the club members abstractly
assent, is found in the history of their
relation to industrial conditions. Six
years ago the General Federation un-
dertook to help the solution of certain
industrial problems, notably to further
organization among working-women ; to
secure and enforce child labor legisla-
tion where needed ; to further atten-
dance at school ; and to secure humane
conditions under which labor is per-
formed. State federations have acted
in accordance with the General Federa-
tion's plans to appoint standing indus-
trial committees, procure investigations,
circulate literature, and create a pub-
lic sentiment in favor of these causes.
In Illinois this indirect power was of
much aid in securing a Child Labor
Law. In other communities something
has been accomplished by way of enact-
ing new laws or enforcing existing ones,
showing that organized women readily
avail themselves of the chance for indi-
rect service in promoting the intelligent
efforts of the federations.
On the other hand, there are three
opportunities by means of which women's
clubs and their members can directly
effect in a limited and local sense that
industrial amelioration for which as
federations they work so zealously. The
first is found in the industrial conditions
of the South, where it has been proved
that the establishment of schools that
offer manual training combined with
622
The Work of the Woman's Club.
some study of books, and with practical
work in gardens and kitchens, will offset
the attraction the factory has had for the
children in its vicinity. These schools
are called " Model Schools," and have
been successfully inaugurated in Georgia.
Their need is financial, and Southern
women have brought the nature and
needs of this work, which is, in a broad
sense, an industrial reform, to the notice
of women's clubs in the North. In 1903
the clubs of Massachusetts established
their first school at Cass, Georgia, and
assured its maintenance for two years.
But there is no other evidence that this
significant opportunity for industrial
amelioration has received that prompt
and direct support that might warrant-
ably have been expected.
The Child Labor Committee of the
General Federation has furnished indi-
vidual clubs with a second direct oppor-
tunity. This committee finds that the
argument most frequently encountered
while attempting to enact Child Labor
legislation has been that the earnings of
little children are needed to support
widowed mothers. Therefore the com-
mittee requests clubs to investigate local
conditions, and whenever an apparent
case of this nature is found, " to per-
suade the children thus employed to
return to school, undertaking to pay the
amount of the weekly wage, which the
child formerly earned, to his widowed
mother." This money is to be called
and regarded as a scholarship. The plan
resembles one that has been carried on
successfully by the state authorities in
Switzerland for twenty-five years ; there-
fore it is neither a visionary nor imprac-
ticable scheme, but one in which women
could realize their traditional responsi-
bilities toward the children of the com-
munity, and in which women's clubs
could find a beneficent opportunity for
direct and constructive work toward in-
dustrial amelioration. Eight such schol-
arships have been established in Chicago.
There is no further evidence that any
woman's club has undertaken to carry
out this plan.
The third instance is comprised in the
unique opportunity for individual, as well
as united, service offered to women by
the Consumers' League. This is the
case of the individual purchaser, and of
the product in one line of manufactured
goods. For some years the Consumers'
League has urged upon the community
the righteousness of buying only such
goods as have been produced under hu-
mane conditions, believing that the final
determiner of these conditions is the
purchaser. But the claims of the Con-
sumers' League are well known, and it
is also known to all women that " white
goods " bearing the League's significant
label can be bought in open market for
prices that are entirely fair. Many state
federations and the General Federation
are pledged to further the work of the
League. Single clubs give exhibitions
of white goods, and form small local
groups of membership. But the next
step, the step that concerns the individual
and makes the 275,000 members of wo-
men's clubs consistent purchasers of these
goods, is not taken. The " bargain coun-
ter " is the same scene of conflict as of
yore ; and the woman who belongs to an
organization pledged to industrial reform
is a lively participant in this warfare of
questionable economy.
The weakness of the club movement
is this lack of real contact of ideals be-
tween the federations and the single
club. The latter is satisfied, selfish, ab-
sorbed in its own local concerns ; the
federation appeals are a disquieting in-
terruption to its orderly programme ;
while the federations, counting on their
numerical strength, and believing in the
ultimate awakening of the club, flatter
it into an acquiescence that is mistak-
en for cooperation. In undertaking to
awaken interest in so many lines of
work, the federations jeopardize all in-
terests, and minimize the value of each.
If the women's clubs of 1904 could come
The Law of the Soul.
623
together on the platform of some com-
mon and fundamental social need, as did
their progenitors, the club writ large in
its federations would no longer be an
elaborate organization for the dissemi-
nation of propaganda, but would at once
become that which it now may seem to
be, — a social force. Its incoherences
would be explained, its complex methods
and motives would be simplified, and its
institutional rank might be assigned.
I asked my grocer recently what he
thought of our woman's club. And he,
with careful precision, answered me, " I
think your lady's club is very dressy."
While I was still revolving the grocer's
answer, I chanced to see these words of
an eminent educator : " When the his-
tory of this period comes to be written,
it will be recognized that from 1870 to
1900 was a period of greater significance
than any former two hundred years ; and
out of that whole time of thirty years,
that which will be recognized as the most
significant, as the most far-reaching, will
be the movement that is represented by
the women's clubs."
The adjudication of the two points of
view — the club woman and the club
movement — may still furnish scope for
the altruistic endeavor of the Woman's
Club.
Martha E. D. White.
THE LAW OF THE SOUL.
SHE fitted the piece of board over
the broken step, sawing it off and nail-
ing it down with a practiced hand.
When it was finished she did not stand
off, with head on one side, eyeing it
complacently, as amateurs in the arts
and trades are apt to do, but picked
up her tools, and putting them away
in a shed near by, walked off to the
next duty with a dull deliberateness
of action which spoke more of habit
than of interest. She was a tall, thin
woman, with a figure which might have
been graceful if more becomingly clad
than in an ill-fitting calico gown. Her
face was lined and roughened by wea-
ther, and her hair, drawn tightly back,
had grown white on the temples. To
her neighbors Mrs. Allen was only an
every-day woman, aging fast, unsocia-
ble and taciturn ; but to one who read
beyond the pothooks of observation, her
features were notably clear-cut and del-
icate, and the refinement of her voice
and speech, when she did speak, was in
striking contrast to the slipshod dialect
of her neighbors.
Eight years before, husband and
wife, with their few belongings, com-
ing from no one knew where, moved
into the little two-room, weather-beat-
en gray house in the pine clearing,
and settled down to the monotonous
existence of country solitude. They
made no reference to their past, nor
ever spoke of the future beyond the
moment, their few and scattered neigh-
bors accepting them on their merits, and
forgetting, as time went by, that there
had ever been a period when they had
not known the Aliens. If the women
complained of Mrs. Allen's lack of so-
ciability, the men could not find fault
with Mr. Allen on the same score.
He not only never shunned society, but
sought it with a shambling alacrity and
perseverance which, if put into any
kind of work, would have achieved
some remarkable results. The women
pronounced him "tur'ble shif'less, "
but the men always grumblingly took
his part.
" Women, " they contended, " were
allus hard on er man ef he did n't wu'k
624
The Law of the Soul.
from the firs' wink of the sun to his'n
las', an' never made no 'lowunce for
er man's er-gittin' ti'ahed."
"Women," said one philosopher,
passing a black bottle to Mr. Allen
behind a screen of blackberry bushes,
"women is mighty good comfut 'roun'
er stove whar there 's vittles to cook,
but they 's col' tarnachun w'en they
gits to pokin' their noses out'n doors.
Yessir. Ye gits ez much comfut out'n
them ez ye git er-settin' down on er
palmetter clump. Yessir."
Mr. Allen agreed with him, show-
ing his tobacco-stained teeth in an art-
less smile as he accepted the hospital-
ity of the bottle, drinking from it with
an avidity that was a striking, if word-
less, explanation of what was otherwise
inexplicable in his situation.
After finishing the step, Mrs. Allen
moved about the back yard, making
ready for the night. The chickens
and ducks gathered around her, cluck-
ing and quacking with garrulous famil-
iarity, she answering them with tender
diminutives, like an affectionate inter-
change of thought. When she had
given them their supper she let in the
cow from the woods, tied her, and
placed everything ready for the milk-
ing. Then, going to the rails dividing
the yard from an adjoining field, she
called, "Henry! "
A man came slouching toward her
across the furrows of sweet potatoes,
white with bloom. He was in his
shirt-sleeves, and carried a bucket in
one hand, a hoe in the other. He
dropped them both as he climbed stiffly
over the rails forming the fence.
"Didn't git any potatoes," he
drawled; "soon as I begun to hoe, my
arms got so tired I jus' had to give
up, an' I 'vebeen sittin' there restin'."
In spite of the slouchiness of his
speech a certain timbre — intangible
— betrayed the better things of long
ago. He dropped down on the box
his wife had placed by the cow for his
convenience in milking, as though there
was not, a muscle in his body firmly
jointed, and his backbone nothing but
a strip of rag. He took off his soft
hat, let it fall to the ground, and
slowly rolled up his sleeves. His face
was remarkable for its peculiar pallor,
looking as though it had been bleached
of every drop of blood ; his eyes, faded
and weak, never rested directly on any
object, but only glanced furtively at it
from the corners ; his hair and beard
were in the colorless transition stage
of passing from blond to white, and
his stooping figure gave him the false
appearance of old age.
"My arms are so weak I don't know
as I can do much milkin'," he said,
still dallying.
His wife sighed. "Let me do it,
then," she replied, a note of weary
resignation in her voice.
"Never mind; I reck'n I kin git
'nough for supper ; I '11 try, at any
rate." His mouth had a habit of
twitching when he finished speaking,
as if the word still trembled on his
tongue in dumb speech. There was an
odd look of elation on his flaccid face
which his wife could not but notice, and
it caused her to observe him more close-
ly with a suspicion he was quick to note.
"Think I've been drinkin'," he
said, eyeing her covertly, with a weak
smile of triumph at his penetration.
"I ain't had a drop; ain't seen no-
body to drink with ; no men lef ' 'round
here to-day, — all of them off beatin'
the woods for that feller."
"What fellow?'"
"The feller that — that killed ol'
woman Barton. I tell 'em they 'd
better save their legs an' their horses;
he ain't fool 'nough to stay 'round
where they 'd lynch him ; by this time
he 's safe somewheres in the city ; " and
he chuckled feebly.
The cow looked back and lowed, as
if asking why matters did not proceed.
He took the hint, and dropping his fore-
head against her flank, inertly began to
draw a thin stream of milk into the pail.
The Law of the Soul.
625
"You needn't wait," he mumbled
from his resting-place. "I '11 put her
up."
She turned away with what sounded
like a sigh of relief. Going to the
tool - shed she took up a trowel and
passed to the front of the house. The
distance from the house to the road
was very short. On each side of the
walk leading to the rickety gate, and
against the house itself, were flower-
beds bright with salvias and chrysan-
themums, and the roses were blooming
in the waxen perfection of their fall
loveliness. She knew, as we all know
and count the treasures that we cannot
have, that her flowers would be the
handsomer and more abundant for more
care and culture, but she put the thought
away, trying to lay all burdens out of
sight, for the few minutes snatched
from her busy day were the bright
beads in her rosary of cares. She went
to work, digging about the roots, sift-
ing the soil with her fingers, and pat-
ting it down again with affectionate
care. If she had been a demonstra-
tive woman she would have pressed
the roses to her cheek, or dropped a
kiss upon their petals. She loved her
flowers with passionate tenderness as
the one refinement and luxury left her
in the shipwreck of her life.
While she was busy with her plea-
sant task a cow came galloping down
the road with the ungainly energy of
her ungraceful kind. A rope was
around her neck, and hanging on to
the other end of the rope was a much
heated and exasperated boy. Follow-
ing more leisurely in their wake, a
switch in one hand, a sunbonnet in the
other, was a stout, middle-aged wo-
man, somewhat out of breath. At
sight of Mrs. Allen she readily halted,
resting her arms on the top rail of the
worm fence.
"Been up to the woods, a-huntin'
my cow," she volunteered, when they
had exchanged greetings; "she 's like
some folks, — got to switch her inter
VOL. xcin. — NO. 559. 40
the notion of er-goin' home; but onct
she gits er-started, there 's no a-holdin'
her back. Reck'n Johnny's arms '11
be mos' pulled out'r their sockets
'fore he gits through with her. Heerd
the news, o' course? " — the tone was
strongly suggestive of the hope that it
was yet to be told.
Mrs. Allen very briefly said she had
not.
"Well, they 've done ketched the
nigger ez kilt ol' Mis' Bartin, — found
him up in the Pine Ridge thicket, er-
livin' off'n the po' soul's chickings.
He 's er short, chunky nigger, black ez
er coal, they sez, an' pow'ful strong.
Co'se he sez he never done it, 'dares
he 's jes' er-trampin' it to the city, an'
bein' mos' starved, jes' gathered up
the chickings he foun' er-runnun' loose
in the woods. Nobody don't b'lieve
him, an' they 've got him locked up
in jail down to town," nodding her
head toward the west. Then she
leaned farther over the fence and
lowered her voice impressively : " Mark
my words, Mis' Allen, 'fore mornin'
there '11 be mo' than nuts er-hangin'
to the pecan tree by ol' Mis' Bart in 's
gate."
Mrs. Allen met her significant gaze
in silence. Then instinctively both
women looked up the pine-sentineled
road toward the east where, nearly a
mile farther on, at a turn in the road
toward the south, a small house faced
them, its tightly closed doors and
blinds almost hidden from sight by the
great pecan tree growing on one side
of the gate. The setting sun had dyed
its branches a moist crimson.
Forty years ago this same tree had
bravely put forth from the ground.
For forty years it had shaded the joys
and sorrows of the house's inmates,
tossing down its nuts into the eager-
ly upraised hands of happy children,
dropping its leaves on the pine coffins
as, one by one, husband and children
had been carried to the grave ; and
now it had been the sole witness of
626
The Law of the Soul.
the violent close of the last life.
Henceforth house and tree would stand
isolated, debarred from human con-
tact, the prey of bat and squirrel, for
Murder had set its red seal on the
gate.
Mrs. Allen turned her gaze away
with a sigh. "Why don't they let
the law deal with him ? " she said
dully, in response to Mrs. Bilbo's in-
sinuation. "He may be truly inno-
cent."
Mrs. Bilbo shook her head with
stout conviction. "He's the right
man, sho'. It was a real nigger ac'.
There ain't no w'ite man in these here
parts ez would choke er po' ol' woman
to death for her little savin's, and all
the niggers 'bout here is bonus' an'
frien'ly. You kin sot yo' min' to it
that this strange nigger war'n't prowl-
in' 'bout here fo' no good puppose,
an' I reck'n they '11 send him out'n
this worF ez quick ez he sent her."
Mrs. Allen shuddered. "It's hor-
rible ! " she murmured, almost acutely.
Mrs. Bilbo stared at her; there
were shades of feeling that her mind's
eye had never read. "It ain't any
worse 'n what he done," she said re-
sentfully, "an' it '11 learn other fo'ks
to be mo' keerful of their ac's."
Mrs. Allen made no further remark,
crumbling a dead rose leaf in her hand
with her usual stony air of emotion-
less lethargy. Mrs. Bilbo continued
to discourse on the all-absorbing topic,
but, eliciting no other expression of
interest, she took her arms from the
fence as the first move toward de-
parture.
"Well," she said, and the exclama-
tion had the nettled ring of the dis-
appointed raconteur, "I mus' be git-
tin' on. But don't forgit, if you
hears any oncommon noise down this
road to-night, that I give you warnin'
of it. I mus' hurry to git home 'fore
dark. Good-night to you, " and Mrs.
Bilbo went down the road toward the
west, where the crimsoned clouds fast
darkened to purple, mentally conclud-
ing that she would "sooner talk to er
gatepos' 'n some fo'ks, 'cause you
don't look fo' nothin' from a gatepos',
but you do from fo'ks, 'specially w'en
you 've got sunthin' more 'n common to
tell 'em." Life to Mrs. Bilbo had no
greater burden than its inevitable in-
terruptions to conversation.
The November night was frosty and
still and clear. Mrs. Allen shivered,
but not with cold ; she could scarcely
have said with what. Her scant time
of recreation had been cut short; it
was now too dark to see. She went
slowly, it might be reluctantly, to the
door, casting a lingering look back at
her flowers. The roses gleamed palely
in the fast falling night like a mystic
lifting of white hands, and the jasmine
and honeysuckle breathed their essence
in her face. If there was a frost be-
fore morning the jasmine would be
killed. Jasmine, like happiness, lives
only in the garden of the sun.
She turned into the room with a
sigh. Lighting a lamp, she placed it
on the white pine table standing in
the centre of the room. In front of
the big open fireplace was a stove, the
pipe running into the chimney. The
walls were the upright boards of the
house, rudely whitewashed, the cook-
ing utensils hanging on them, with two
or three colored prints, a rasher of
baeon, and strings of dried peppers.
There was but one other room, the
bedroom, which opened into it. The
other openings were a window in the
side, and the front and back doors, di-
rectly opposite each other. Starting
a fire in the stove, she put on some
coffee to heat and a square of corn bread
in the oven to re- warm. Then she
set the table with two heavy stone
china plates, but the cup she put at
her husband's place was of delicate old
china, and — strange anomaly in their
rude surroundings — the napkins were
in silver rings. She did her work with
the same mechanical precision with
The Law of the Soul.
627
which she had mended the step, and
her hands, coming under the light,
were a pathetic history of hard work,
with their worn disfigurement of scars
and broken nails.
When she had put some bacon on
the stove to fry, she went to the back
door and peered out into the yard.
The moon had not yet risen, and the
darkness seemed doubly great awaiting
its coming. The frostiness in the air
lent additional brilliancy to the stars,
and against the glittering background
the crowded tops of the forest pines
were densely outlined.
"I wonder what's keeping him,"
she murmured. "He can't be milk-
ing all this time. This is the second
night he has stayed out so long."
She seemed about to call, but, check-
ing the impulse, stepped down into the
yard and went out to the cow-shed.
He was not there, but the cow was in
her stall, comfortably munching hay,
and recognizing her mistress's step,
gave a soft low of welcome ; the chick-
ens rustled in the trees, and the air
was so still and clear that the falling
of a leaf almost created an echo, and
the distant barking of a dog traveled
on indefinitely.
Passing around a clump of orange
trees growing by a shed, she came to
a lean-to, thatched with pine boughs,
where the firewood was corded up to
within a foot of the top. In the open-
ing, coming from the narrow space
back of the wood, was the dim reflec-
tion of a light, evidently shaded from
casting its rays too strongly upward.
The unusualness of it, the absence of
her husband, coupled with the recent
tragedy in the neighborhood, filled her
with a sudden fear that caused her to
hesitate in dread of she knew not what.
But gathering her courage together,
she went forward with unconscious
caution, and sought to peer through a
crack in the end of the lean-to. Here
was another surprise, for old bagging
had been stretched across the crack
with evident intention. She knew
that there had never been anything
between the wood and the back of the
lean-to but some broken barrels and
boxes, and this evidence of mystery in
so innocent a place set her heart to throb-
bing in breathless anxiety. She was
about to turn away to go to the other
end when a ray of light, falling through
a knothole near the ground, caught
her attention. With a horrible dread
holding her heart almost pulseless in
its grip, she knelt down and put her
eye to the hole. She saw a bit of
candle stuck in the ground, a box
propped over it like a bird trap to
screen the light from shooting upward ;
half crouched by it, on his heels, was
her husband ; before him on the ground
were five little heaps of coin, — dol-
lars, halves, quarters, dimes, and nick-
els. His long forefinger, the chalky skin
tightly shriveled over the bones, trav-
eled rapidly over the piles, — one,
two, three, four, five ; then back again,
— one, two, three, four, five. Then
it climbed up each heap, touching sepa-
rately the edge of every coin with ca-
ressing exactitude as he bent over them
as though he could have kissed them
in his sordid passion. But his wife
saw nothing of his face ; she had eyes
only for a small calico bag lying over
one knee. She had seen that bag once
before when old Mrs. Barton had drawn
it from its hiding-place between the
mattresses to give her some change.
She had noticed it then only casually;
now its big red flowers flared in her
face like a mob of mouths shrieking
the secret of the crime! She did not
cry out nor faint, but knelt motionless,
paralyzed by the horror of the shock.
The man, as he sat gloating over
his pitiful treasure, was oblivious for
the moment of any fear of detection,
seemingly unconscious to any thought
but that the money was his, — his alone,
— to finger, to hoard, to spend, just
as it suited his pleasure, and she watched
him with a sickened, dead fascination,
628
The Law of the Soul.
precluding every thought of danger to
herself if discovered.
Presently he opened the little bag,
and slowly, reluctantly, piece by piece,
returned the money to it, lastly put-
ting in some bills which had been ly-
ing across the other knee; then he
placed it in a hole in the ground, cov-
ering it with earth, over which he
placed a box full of straw, scattering
straw about, making it appear like a
looted hen's nest. His next move-
ment, to take up the bit of candle and
blow it out, roused her from her torpor,
and she fled to the house as one flies
with a nameless terror at his heels.
The kitchen was filled with the odor
of burning bacon. She did not notice
it, but stood with the stove between
her and the door, her wide-stretched,
horror-stricken eyes fixed on the square
of night it framed. She had not long
to wait before a booted foot struck the
step, and her husband's face appeared
in the doorway, more ghastly than ever
in its pallor with the night as back-
ground.
"Smells like the bacon 's burnin' to
cinders," he drawled. "Fry in '-pan
upset?"
The woman mechanically looked at
the stove, and, more by instinct than rea-
son, removed the pan and replaced the
burned bacon with fresh. Her husband
put down the pail and shut the door.
"Gittin' chilly outside," he re-
marked, with a little shiver. "Should
n't wonder if we had frost 'fore morn-
in'." He took down his coat from a
nail in the wall, and, putting it on,
shambled over to the table and took
his seat. "Didn't git more 'n 'nough
milk for supper," he continued; "my
arms give out 'fore I was half through.
Think I '11 hire a boy to milk. I need
res'. Fellers as ain't born to work
can't thrive on it same as fellers that
are, an' I 'm all broke up." He was
evidently used to having his remarks
pass unnoticed, as he seemed to accept
his wife's silence as a matter of course.
"Coffee ain't done yet? " he in-
quired in a tone of latent irritation,
after vainly waiting to be served.
As she brought the coffee to the
table and poured it out, she did not
look at him; and instead of handing
him his cup, as usual, pushed it so
slightly toward him that he had to
reach across the table and take it for
himself.
"What 're you lookin' at my hands
for ? " he demanded, with querulous
protest. "I washed 'em at the pump
'fore I come in; no need to wash 'em
over again jes' to please you, is there ? "
She turned away without reply, and
made a pretense of stirring the fire.
"Ain't you goin' to eat any sup-
per? " he asked more genially, when
the coffee had warmed him up.
Her lips parted to reply, but her
voice failed, until, with great effort,
she finally answered in a low tone,
"I 'm not hungry."
"Reck'n nobody's hungry," he
gibed, with puerile irritation; "with
no thin' to eat mornin', noon, an' night
but corn bread, molasses, and bacon,
— it's a wonder one half of us ain't
a bag of meal an' the other half a
porker. I 'in tired of this picayune
bus'niss. What 're we made human
for if we don't feed better 'n animals?
I can't stand it any longer. I 'm go-
in' to take the livin' in my own hands
an' buy some decent food, — somethin'
one kin eat an' enjoy, an' not have
the thought of it afterwards turn one
sick at the stomach. You needn't
think you '11 have to dole out the
money, " — as a quick, irrepressible
gesture of his wife's caught his shift-
ing glance, — "I '11 attend to that. I
was n't born a miser, thank the Lord ! "
— and he chuckled with a sickening
air of self-satisfaction. "Look at
me, " he continued, spreading his hands
on the table; "I don't b'lieve I've
got 'nough blood in my body to fill a
saucer; it 's time I was thinkin' some-
thin' of myself; unselfishness kills
The Law of the Soul.
629
more people 'n disease." He raised
his cup and drained it to the last drop,
then set it down with a hand that
trembled as if from palsy or extreme
old age.
His supper finished, he dragged his
chair over to the stove, and, sitting
down, stretched out his legs well under
it to get the full benefit of the heat,
and, leaning back, folded his hands
in his lap, and half closed his eyes,
like a cat that lies at ease, while his
wife washed the tea things, putting
them away in a small cupboard against
the wall. It must have been a heavy
task, from the close and concentrated
attention she gave it.
The heat seemed to produce a more
genial mood in Mr. Allen as he began
a dribble of talk, chiefly relating to
his boyhood and the excellent cooking
of a certain Aunt Sally who had enun-
ciated the truism, "I does de cookin'
an' Marsa Henry de eatinV He was
too absorbed to see the glances his wife
sent in his direction, — shrinking, de-
spairing, yet now and then doubting,
as if they strove to grip the truth of
what the tongue refused to question.
When she opened the back door to
throw out the crumbs, a black cat came
running in out of the darkness, mew-
ing piteously, its eyes gleaming like
diamonds in the opposing light. It
rubbed itself confidingly against her
skirt, looking pleadingly up in her
face, evidently, from its leanness, ask-
ing for food. She drew it in, shut
the door, and, getting a saucer, gave
it milk, which it lapped ravenously.
The man's babble stopped abruptly,
his half-shut eyes centring on the cat
with curious intentness.
"Where 'd that thing come from? "
he demanded sharply. His wife was
apparently too absorbed in the cat's
comfort to hear. "Where 'd that cat
come from ? " he repeated.
Her answer came with evident diffi-
culty. "It's old — it's one of the
neighbors' cats."
"What'd you let it in for?" he
asked with restless insistence and
shrinking. "You know I hate cats.
Turn it out and let it starve."
She rubbed the animal gently.
"When it 's had enough to eat I '11
turn it out," she replied quietly.
His face twitched. "Curse it! —
if I didn't hate to touch 'em I 'd take
it by its tail and pitch it out myself.
The sight of 'em always makes me
nervous. I feel now like the infernal
thing had its claws in my heart!
Turn it out, an' don't you let it come
sneakin' back to stay in here all night.
I 'd know it in my sleep." He moved
his hand restlessly. "It 's a witch, —
all those black cats are witches ; it
ought to be drowned 'stead of bein'
pampered an' fed! Don't you fail
to turn it out ! "
Suddenly, as she bent protectingly
over the poor animal, she became aware
of a vibration rather than a sound in
the atmosphere outside, a distinct wave
of motion ; like a rustle of wind-stirred
leaves viewed through a closed window
it touched the mind rather than the
ear. Involuntarily she raised her head
and listened. Her husband caught the
action with covert sharpness, and imi-
tated it with an alertness that was
startling.
More distinct the vibration grew
through the stillness, coming nearer
and nearer, shaping itself at last into
the grim distinctness of the marching
of many feet, the terrible reality of
men moving through the night with
sinister purpose as guide. The woman
sprang to her feet, her eyes wide with
despair.
"Lynchers!"
The word seemed to form of itself
and ring through the room with un-
ending reverberation . The man dropped
back in his chair as though struck a
palpable blow. His hands twitched
and jerked, his lips gibbered as he
tried to articulate. Raising a shaking
forefinger he pointed to the door.
630
The Law of the Soul.
"Bolt it! " he gasped in a whisper.
"Blow out the light! "
As she did not move, he made an
effort to rise, but his legs refused to
uphold him. "Curse it! " he stuttered
desperately, "don't you see I can't
walk ? Help me ! — open the back door
so I can get out. Blow out the light
an' they can't see us move! Blow it
out, I say ! blow it out, quick ! "
As she still stood motionless, he
writhed in his impotence. "You want
'em to come!" he panted; "you're
showing 'em the way! If I could get
up from this chair I 'd kill you! Come
an' help me, — you! "
She looked at him, and he was so
horrible to see in his abject, conscience-
smitten terror she let her glance fall
quickly away. "They " — she gasped
for breath. "They — have the man
— they believe — to be the " — But
the word would not be said.
He caught at her meaning with eager
hope. "They have him?" he whis-
pered. "They're goin' to — hang
him? Are you sure? Who told
you?"
"Mrs. Bilbo, " — her voice was tone-
less. "It's — a negro."
The effect was electrical, life-giv-
ing. He sat up and drew a long
breath.
"So they got him after all, did
they? " he said, with a sickening ef-
fort at ease. "Well, — they '11 make
short work of him."
He got up and steadied himself
shakily on his feet. "Ib'lieve" — with
a quavering laugh — "I '11 go an' help
'em."
"Henry! " The cry was anguished.
He shrugged himself, giving her a
quick, shifting glance, and laughed
again. "Maybe they 've got 'nough
without me," and he still tried to
stand firmly on his feet. "Sounds
like it, at any rate."
There was now but the few feet of
garden between them and the mur-
dered woman's avengers; they could
hear the tread of horses among that
of men, and the clinking of bits and
stirrups.
He stood with twitching lips, in-
tently listening, scarcely breathing,
until the crowd had passed. Unno-
ticed, the cat had coiled itself up
under the stove, but disturbed by the
voices, it crept out and rubbed itself
against the man's legs. He looked
down at the touch, but shrank back
with a mumbled cry; then, with a
spasm of fury or fear, gave it a kick
that sent it, crying and spitting,
against the wall, where it crouched,
eyeing him malevolently.
The woman pressed her hands against
her breast as if suffocating. "Henry,"
she gasped, "there must be some way
of stopping them! "
"Stoppin' them? " he jeered. "Stop
the Mississippi ! "
"My God!— Why don't they let
the law deal with him ? "
He looked at her with furtive sharp-
ness. "What's it to you," he de-
manded, "if they hang every thievin'
nigger in the land ? "
"But if he 's innocent! " she urged.
"Innocent! " he snarled. "What
makes you keep on harpin' 'bout his
innocence? What do you know 'bout
it?"
Their eyes met.
The strained misery of her face was
intensified by the shadows cast upward
by the light as she stood by the ta-
ble.
With head bent forward he kept his
eyes fixed on her face with demandant,
threatening rigidity. " Well ? " he
sneered. " 'Fraid to talk?" His
hands stealthily clinched and un-
clinched as they hung by his sides.
" I " — she looked away from him,
her words so halting and low they
were scarcely audible, — "I — saw. "
"What?"
She could not speak; she raised her
hand and pointed out toward the yard .
With the silent swiftness of a cat
The Law of the Soul.
631
he sprang at her, his fingers on her
throat. He forced her back against
the wall, his fingers tightening in their
grip, his under lip clutched between
his teeth, his twitching muscles turned
to steel, the nerve of a brute in every
strained and swelling sinew. She did
not struggle or even raise her hands to
thrust him back, her spirit living only
in her eyes, staring out with agonized
despair. The cat, terrified beyond
measure, bounded about the room,
blindly seeking an exit, springing over
the table and -chairs, and finally hurl-
ing itself through the window pane.
The crash shocked the man into look-
ing around; unconsciously he loosened
his hold, and, in a pulse beat, the re-
action caught him, his strength col-
lapsed, he staggered, threw out his
arms, and fell to the floor, writhing,
his face livid and distorted.
The woman leaned against the wall,
faint, catching her breath in labored
strains. For the moment life and
memory were a blank; then, her eyes
focusing on the wretch on the floor,
both came back like a vital stab. Im-
pulsively she moved to him with the
instinct of help, then checked herself
and hurriedly turned to the door.
With her hand on the bolt she looked
back. " Christ help me !"
Throwing open the door, she ran out
and up the road, face to face with the
rising moon, and before her, like a
flying shadow, sped the cat. Behind
her, the growing moonlight spread its
silver veil over her garden where the
flowers, like the disciples in that other
Garden long ago, drooped their heads
in sleep while the spirit which had fed
their lives and sowed their resurrection
cried out, unheeded, in its agonized re-
nunciation.
It was a strange sight the old pecan
tree saw as the moon rose. Blocking
the road and overflowing into the yard
were men armed with rifles or pistols,
a few with cudgels. Some were on
horseback, the majority on foot, and
there was little or no attempt at dis-
guise beyond deeply slouched hats and
turned up coat collars. One man had
climbed the tree, and, sitting astride
of the heaviest limb branching out over
the road, was knotting around it a
rope, the other end of which dangled
loosely down, transformed by the moon-
light into a silver cable. Directly
under it, in a small space ringed by
the crowd, was a short, thickset negro
in his shirt-sleeves, and bareheaded.
Not a muscle of his face moved, but
the moonlight revealed the sullen fire
of his eyes. A man stepped out from
the crowd and faced him.
"You have three minutes to con-
fess, " he said commandingly . " Were
you alone when you did it ? "
"I ain't got nuthin' to confess,"
was the dogged reply. "I don't know
nuthin' 'bout it."
"It 's no use your lying. Once for
all, were you alone, and where is the
money ? " No answer. " Two min-
utes gone; in one more you '11 swing
from that tree, your body riddled with
bullets. Confess! "
The smothered fire broke forth.
"I ain't got nuthin' to confess; I toP
you I ain't done it, an' don't know
nuthin' 'bout who done it. You 're
jes' er-murd'rin' me, you w'ite men!
The Lord knows I 'm innurcunt, an*
you '11 pay fo' dis night's wu'k 'fore
yo' Maker."
"Swing him!"
Ready hands seized and thrust him
on a horse brought forward for the pur-
pose and stationed under the rope. As
they passed the noose over his head
he cried, "Glory! Glory hallelujah!
Lord, take me home! "
As the whip was about to fall on the
horse's flank a voice came from the
distance: "Stop! Stop!"
Every face turned in the direction
from whence it came. Up the road,
braided with moonlight and shadow, a
woman was running at full speed.
632
The Law of the Soul.
Through the dewy stillness they could
distinctly hear each labored breath.
"Stop! " she repeated as she reached
them. "Let him go! — I did it, —
nobody but I ! "
Bewildered, stunned, the crowd
looked at one another, helpless. Theirs
was a simple creed of honor, with wo-
man as its foundation stone, — woman
the weak, the loving, the merciful.
No wonder they stared at her in hor-
rified surprise ! No wonder they shrank
from her as from a thing accursed!
"Cut the rope! " some one found
voice to command. When it was done
they melted away as before a poisonous
breath, and she stood alone in the road,
not even the creature whose life she
had saved pausing to give her thanks.
"I d'clare, " Mrs. Bilbo proclaimed
to a circle of absorbed feminine friends,
"w'en I heerd it you could have
knocked me down with a pindar shell !
An' I a-talkin' to her that very even-
in' with jes' the fence between us!
Wen Bill Evans went 'bout daylight
to git her, thar she were a-settin' on
ol' Mis' Bartin's do 'step, narry bun-
nit or shawl on, jes' like she 'd been
a-settin' thar all night. W'en she
seen Bill a-comin' she riz up an' come
to meet him, an' sez, jes' ez cool ez
you please, sez she, ' You 've come to
fetch me,' an' she j'ined him, an' they
come erlong the road tergether, pass
her own do', an' she would n't stop for
nuthin', jes' sez, er-noddin' t'ards the
house, ' You '11 see to some one a-takin'
keer of him, won't you? He 's sick.'
An' then she sez, ' You '11 fin' two
picters in my room, ' sez she. ' I
want you to burn 'em up, an' not let
anybody else tech 'em.' An' Bill's
thet sof '-hearted he did jes' as she axes
him, an' Bill sez they were a-mighty
high-minded, genteel lookin' couple,
them picters, an' he reck'ns they were
her ma an' pa. Arter she 'd tol' whar
the money was hid she ain't opened
her mouth ergin, not even to pray with
the preacher; sez ez she 's done pray-
in', ez God knows all thar is to know.
An' it jes' shows how cool she is,
a-takin' the Lord's name in vain, w'en
she has blood on her soul ! Co'se they '11
sentence her to hang, though mos' fo'ks
thinks the Gov'nur'll make it 'priso'-
mint fo' life, ez they ain't never
hanged er woman in this yer state, an'
he ain't the man ez 'd keer to start it.
Ez fo' thet po' husbun' of hern, he 's
thet childish an' silly they 've done put
him at the 'sylum, an' they tells me he
jes' sets 'bout all day er-diggin' holes
in the ground, an' fillin' 'em up ergin
mighty quick w'en any one looks his
way, — er-grinnin' an' er-jabberin'
like er chil' or er monkey. The shock
of findin' out thet he was er-married to
a murd'ress jes' natchully throwed him
inter er fit, an' w'en he come out of it
the leetle min' he had was plum' gone.
An' he ain't never goin' to git it back
ergin, neither, they sez. I allus did feel
sorry fo' him, he so sociabul an' free
talkin', er-married to thet unsociabul
an' close-tongued woman, an' now my
heart jes' feels fit to bus' w'en I thinks
of his sorrerful state. Po', po' soul! "
And her audience, with fullest ac-
cord of sympathy in heart and voice,
echoed Mrs. Bilbo's commiserative ex-
pressions.
Isabel Bowman Finley.
The Common Lot.
THE COMMON LOT.1
XVI.
EVERETT WHEELER could hardly be
reckoned as a man of sentiment. Yet
in the matter of selecting an architect
for the new school he stood out persis-
tently against the wishes of Pemberton
and Judge Phillips, with but one sen-
timental argument, — the Powers Jack-
son trustees must give the commission
for building the great school to the
nephew of the founder, without holding
a competitive trial of any sort.
"It's only square," he insisted.
"Jackson was disappointed about the
will. He had some grounds for feeling
badly used, too. He might have made
us a good deal of trouble at the time,
and he did n't."
"I suppose Powers would think it
queer to pass him by, " Hollister admit-
ted, "seeing he gave the boy a first-
class education to be an architect. And
he 's a hustling, progressive fellow from
all I hear. I must say I admire the
way he 's settled into the collar since
his uncle died! "
This occurred at one of the many
informal meetings of the trustees, now
that the plans for the school were shap-
ing themselves toward action. Pem-
berton, with whom the others happened
to be taking their luncheon, glanced
sharply at Wheeler. Although not
given to suspecting his neighbors of in-
direct motives, Pemberton understood
Wheeler well enough to know that when
the lawyer fell back upon sentiment
there must be another motive in the
background. He had not forgotten
Mrs. Hart's sudden interest in this
question, which he had attributed to an
unwise zeal in behalf of her husband.
It occurred to him now that he had
once heard in past years of Everett
Wheeler's devotion to Nellie Spellman.
"I can't see that it follows that we
should put this plum into his mouth! "
the judge exclaimed testily. "If Pow-
ers had wanted to give the chap any
more money, he would have left it to
him. Frankly, I don't like the fellow.
He 's too smooth, too easy with all the
world."
"We know why you are down on
him, " Wheeler remarked, with a smile.
"He did let your sister-in-law in for a
good deal."
"Well, it is n't just that! Of course
he was beginning then, and wanted to
make his first job as big as possible, —
that 's natural enough. And I guess
Louise — Well it 's her affair ! She
manages her own property, and I
would n't let her spend any of the chil-
dren's money. But I don't like Hart's
methods. Raymond was telling me the
other day how he worked him for that
railroad job, — through — through a
woman. I suppose it 's all right; the
man must get business where he can.
It 's hard for youngsters to make a liv-
ing these days. But to get a woman
to pull off a thing like that for you!
And Raymond told me they had to drop
him, too, — he didn't do the work
economically, or something of the sort. "
"I guess there 's another story to
that, " Wheeler answered patiently.
"Jack was n't willing to let Bushfield
make all he wanted to off the contracts.
I happen to know that. And. I don't
see why you should have it in for him
because he got a lady to say a good
word for him with Raymond. You
know well enough that pretty nearly
all the big commissions for public build-
ings in this city have gone by favor, —
family or social or political pull. It 's
got to be so. You 're bound to think
that the man you know is bigger than
the other fellow you don't know! "
1 Copyright, 1903, by ROBERT HERRICK.
634
The Common Lot.
"The proper way in the case of all
public buildings is to hold an open com-
petition," Pemberton remarked stiffly.
"Well, we won't argue that question.
But this is a special case. Hart knows
more of our plans than any other ar-
chitect, naturally, and he can give us
pretty much all his attention. He '11
push the work faster."
"We can wait," Pemberton object-
ed. "There is no need for undue
haste."
"No, no, John!" Judge Phillips
protested. "I am getting to be an old
man. I want to see the school started
and feel that my duty 's done. We 've
thrashed this out long enough. Let us
take Hart and be done with it."
Pemberton had been added to their
number at the suggestion of the judge,
because of his well-known public spirit
and his interest in educational and phil-
anthropic enterprises. He had under-
taken his duties with his accustomed
energy and conscientiousness, and at
times wearied even the judge with his
scruples. The others had rather hazy
ideas as to the exact form, educational-
ly, that the large fund in their charge
should assume. Wheeler concerned him-
self mainly with the financial side of
the trust. Hollister, who had got his
education in a country school , and Judge
Phillips, who was a graduate of a small
college, merely insisted that the school
should be "practical," with "no non-
sense." After they had rejected the
plan of handing over the bequest to a
university, Pemberton had formed the
idea of founding a technological school,
modeled after certain famous eastern
institutions. This conception Helen
had disturbed by her talk with him, in
which she had vigorously presented the
founder's ideas on education.
In his perplexity Pemberton had
gone east to see the president of a
university, of which he was one of the
trustees, and there he had met one of
the professors in the scientific depart-
ment, one Dr. Everest, a clever organ-
izer of educational enterprises. Dr.
Everest did not find it difficult to con-
vince Mr. Pemberton that his dilemma
was an imaginary one, that all warring
ideals of education might be easily
"harmonized" by a little judicious
"adjustment." There should be some
domestic science for the girls, manual
training combined with technical and
commercial courses for the boys, and
all would be right, especially if the
proper man were employed to mix these
ingredients. In brief, the doctor came
to Chicago at the invitation of the trus-
tees, looked over the ground, and spoke
at several public dinners on the " ideals
of modern education." His eloquent
denunciation of a "mediaeval " educa-
tion, his plea for a business education
for a business people, his alert air and
urbane manners convinced the trustees
that they had found a treasure. Dr.
Everest was invited to become the head
of the new school, which was to be called
the JACKSON INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTE.
When Everett Wheeler had finally
obtained the consent of his associates
to ask the architect to meet the trustees
and the new director and discuss plans
for the building, the lawyer was so
pleased that he broke an engagement
for dinner, and took the train to Forest
Park instead. He might have tele-
phoned the architect, but, sluggish as he
was temperamentally, he had long pro-
mised himself the pleasure of telling
Helen personally the good news. Of
late she had not seemed wholly happy,
and he supposed that there were money
troubles, which would now be relieved.
He found a number of people on tt
veranda of the Harts' house, and
down patiently to wait. It had bee
a warm day, and the men and wome
were lounging comfortably on the grass
mats, gossiping and enjoying the cool
air from the lake. Jackson was in high
spirits, telling Irish stories, a social
gift which he had cultivated. Wheeler
found himself near Venetia Phillips,
The Common Lot.
635
who was nursing a sprained elbow, the
result of being pitched against a fence
by a vicious horse.
"Why don't you try your charms on
Helen? " she asked Wheeler peevishly.
"She 's been out of sorts all this sum-
mer. When you see the solemn way
good married women take their hap-
piness, it does n't encourage you to try
your luck. I wonder if she and Jackie
scrap. She looks as if she had a very
dull life."
"What's the matter?"
"I can't make out exactly. Unsat-
isfied aspirations, or something of the
sort. I should guess that our Jackson
does n't come up to specifications. She
sighs for the larger world. Did you
ever meet a chap who used to give les-
sons in binding paper books? That
was a couple of years ago, when we were
all trying to do something with our
hands, reviving the arts and crafts.
His name was Vleck. He was a poor,
thin little man, with a wife dying from
consumption or something of the sort.
He had hard luck written all up and
down him. I have always thought
Helen wanted to run away with Mr.
Vleck, but could n't get up her courage.
They used to talk socialism and anarchy
and strikes until the air was red. It
was the biggest fun to see him and
Jackson get together. Jack would of-
fer him a cigar, — the bad kind he
keeps for the foremen on his buildings.
Vleck would turn him down, and then
Helen would ask the bookbinder to
luncheon or dinner, and that would
give Jack a fit. But Vleck would n't
stay. He had ideas about the masses
not mixing with the classes until the
millennium comes. Helen would argue
with him, but it was no use. He
thought nothing was on the square.
Well, one day he got huffy about some-
thing Jack said, and went off and never
turned up again. Helen tried to find
him; I don't think she ever got over
it. I believe that Vleck was the man
for her. She is an unsatisfied soul!
I am going, and you had better try to
cheer her up."
It was beyond the lawyer's power,
however, to penetrate Helen's mood.
She seemed curiously removed from the
scene. The banter and talk of the peo-
ple on the veranda passed over her un-
heeded; her eyes rested dreamily on
the trees, among which the summer
twilight was stealing. To rouse her
attention Wheeler brought forth his
news.
"I came out here to tell you some-
thing, Nell, " he said.
"What is it?" she asked indiffer-
ently.
"Jack is going to build the school! "
He looked at her closely. She gave
a little start, as though his words
brought her back to the present, but
she said nothing.
"I 've just argued them into it.
They wanted a public competition, or
something of the kind."
"Why don't they have a competi-
tion? " she asked quickly.
The lawyer shrugged his shoulders.
"Why should they? Is n't Jack the
old man's nephew? "
She made no reply, and he said no-
thing more, dampened by the way she
took his splendid news. In a little
while the others left, and they had din-
ner. Wheeler expected Helen would
tell her husband of the decision, but she
seemed to have forgotten it. So, final-
ly, he was forced to repeat his news.
He dropped it casually and coldly : —
"Well, Jack, we 're getting that
school business cleared up. Can you
meet the trustees and the doctor at my
office some day this week ? "
Jackson bubbled over with glee.
"Hoorah!" he shouted. "Good
for you, Everett. We must have up
some champagne."
The lawyer, watching Helen's im-
passive face, felt inclined to moderate
Jackson's enthusiasm.
"Of course, nothing 's settled as to
the commission. You '11 be asked to
636
The Common Lot.
prepare sketches after you have con-
sulted with Dr. Everest. That 's all."
That was enough for the architect.
He thought that he could satisfy the
director, and if he succeeded with him
the rest of the way was clear. When
the champagne came, he pressed his
thanks on his cousin.
"It 's awfully good of you, Everett,
all the trouble you have taken for me
in this. You '11 have to let me build
that camp in the Adirondacks this fall.
My heavens," he went on, too excited
to be cautious, "you don't know what
a load it takes off my shoulders ! I can
feel myself free once more. It 's a big
thing, the first big thing that 's come
my way since I began. How much do
the trustees mean to put into the build-
ing?"
"That depends," the lawyer an-
swered cautiously. "It will be over
half a million, anyway, I should sup-
pose."
"It 's a great opportunity! " the
architect exclaimed, conscious that the
more elevated and ideal aspects of the
subject were slipping out of sight. "It
does n't come every day, the chance to
build a monument like the school! "
"You're quite right," Wheeler
assented.
In his excitement, Hart left his seat
and began to pace the floor, his hands
twisting his napkin nervously. Helen
was watching the bubbles break in her
champagne glass . Her face had remained
utterly blank, although she seemed to
be listening to her husband. Perhaps,
thought the lawyer, she did not realize
what this meant. So he remarked de-
liberately : —
"It 's a big commission, fast enough,
if you get it. I don't know of another
young fellow in your business in this
city who 's had the same chance to make
his reputation."
Even this did not rouse the wife to
speech. A flush stole over her face,
but her eyes remained buried in the
champagne - glass, which she twirled
gently between her fingers, thus keep-
ing up the effervescence. Jackson was
jubilant enough for two.
"Dr. Everest and I were talking
about the site the other day, " he said.
"You have only two blocks. There
should be four, at least. You must give
dignity to the main building by some
kind of approach. It should be done
in stone, if possible. But if that 's too
costly, we might try white terra cotta.
You can get very good effects in that."
"You may find the judge and Pem-
berton pretty stubborn on matters of
detail, " Wheeler remarked cautiously.
But the architect flirted his napkin
buoyantly. He had dealt with building
committees before, and he had found
that trustees usually took their duties
lightly.
"Well, what do you think of it,
Nell? " the lawyer asked finally.
"Oh! I? " She looked up blankly
from the glass of wine. "It is a great
chance, of course."
Soon after this the lawyer left to get
his train for the city, and Jackson
walked to the station with him. When
he returned he found Helen still sitting
at the empty table. His eyes were
aflame with the golden light of oppor-
tunity. He put his hand over his wife's
shoulder and pressed her cheek affec-
tionately.
"It's great, isn't it, Nell?" he
said.
She looked into his face with a wist-
ful smile. The good news had changed
him wonderfully in this brief hour,
erasing already some lines from his face.
She divined, then, that his nature was
not one that grew in the storms of
life, but needed, rather, the warmth of
prosperity.
"It 's great, is n't it? " he repeated,
desiring to savor the good fortune with
her.
"Yes, Francis," she replied, and
added almost pleadingly, "and you
must do it greatly ! "
"Of course! " he assented cheerily.
The Common Lot.
637
XVII.
About six miles from the centre of
the city on the South Side, not far from
the lake, might be seen the foundations
and first two stories of a considerable
building that had been abandoned for
several years. It was to have been a
hotel, but its promoters, who were small
capitalists from another state, had been
caught in the real estate disasters of
'93. Litigation ensuing among them-
selves, nothing had ever been done with
the property. The unfinished walls,
standing at the corner of one of the
boulevards and overlooking a large park,
were a landmark in the neighborhood.
A thick growth of weeds partially cov-
ered the loose piles of brick and stone
that littered the ground and filled the
hollow shell. Desolate, speedily dis-
integrating, the ruin stood there, four
windowless walls, a figure of unsubstan-
tial and abortive enterprise!
Hart had often passed the ruin when
his business called him to that part of
the city. One day this summer, as he
was driving through the park with
Graves on his way to inspect the last
string of cheap stone houses that the
contractor had built, Graves called his
attention to the place.
"That pile must be pretty well cov-
ered with tax-liens, " the contractor ob-
served, as they turned into the boule-
vard, and approached the ruin. "It 's
a sightly piece of property, too, and
the right spot for a family hotel."
"Who are the owners? " Hart asked.
"A lot of little fellers out in Omaha ;
they got to fightin' among themselves.
It might be had cheap. Let 's go over
and take a look at the place."
He hitched his horse to a tree in
front of the ruin, and the two men
pushed their way through the weeds
and rubbish into the cellar.
" Pretty solid foundations, " the con-
tractor observed, picking at a piece of
mortar with the blade of his clasp knife.
"There 's most enough stone lying
around here to trim the whole building.
What do you think of the walls ? Has
the frost eat into 'em much? "
They scrambled in and out among the
piers and first story walls, testing the
mortar, scraping away the weeds here
and there to get a closer view of the
joints. The upper courses of the brick
had been left exposed to the weather
and were obviously crumbling. The
architect thought that the outer walls
might have to be rebuilt from the
foundations. But the contractor ob-
served that it would be sufficient to rip
off half a dozen courses of the masonry.
"Those fellers thought they were
going to have a jim-dandy Waldorf,
judging from the amount of stone they
were putting in! " the contractor re-
marked, as they climbed into the buggy
and resumed their way to the city. " I
guess it would n't take much to buy up
the tax -rights. The land and material
would be worth it."
"I should say so," the architect as-
sented, seeing how the matter was shap-
ing itself in his companion's mind.
"Those foundations would take a
pretty big building, eight or ten sto-
ries."
"Easily."
They talked it over on their way back
to the city. The contractor had al-
ready formed a plan for utilizing the
property. He had in mind the organ-
ization of a construction company, which
would pay him for building the hotel
with its bonds, and give him a large
bonus of stock besides. The architect
was familiar with that method of oper-
ation. The hotel when finished would
be rented to another company for oper-
ation, and by that time the contractor
and his friends would have disposed of
their stock and bonds.
" You must let me in on this, " the
architect said boldly, as they neared
the city. "I 'm getting sick of play-
ing your man Friday, and taking what
you give me, Graves! "
638
The Common Lot.
"There 's no reason why you should
n't make something, too," the contrac-
tor answered readily. "You might
interest some of your rich friends in
the scheme, and get a block of stock for
yourself."
Hart had a pressing need of ready
money rather than such dubious pro-
moter's profits. Rainbow and Harris
had not pushed him to pay the balance
against him on their books, but their
leniency would not extend beyond the
first of the month. Then, if he could
not get the money in some other way,
he should have to go to his mother, or
take the little legacy that his uncle had
left Helen. That very day he had had
it in mind to ask the contractor to let
him have twelve thousand dollars on his
note, which would get him out of his
immediate difficulties. He could pay
it with the first return from the school
commission, on which he was reckoning.
But when the contractor described
the hotel project, he resolved to wait a
little longer, in the hope that somehow
he might make more than enough to pay
his debts. What he needed was some
capital. It was to get capital that
he had ventured with the broker. Why
had he not had the wit to see the chance
that lay in that old ruin ? For the last
five years many men that he knew had
been making fortunes, while he was
working hard for precarious wages. No
matter what he might earn in his pro-
fession, he could never feel at ease, have
enough for his ambitions. He must
have capital, — money that would breed
money independently of his exertions.
Latterly his mind had turned much
about this one desire.
"You '11 want me to draw the plans
for the hotel, I suppose? " he asked.
" Yes, you might get up some sketches
for a ten-story building right away, —
something to show the men I want to
interest in the scheme," Graves an-
swered quickly. "When you have it
ready, come around and we '11 see if we
can't fix up some kind of deal."
It was evident that the contractor
had gone much farther in the hotel
matter than he had told Hart.
Then came the word from Everett
that the trustees were ready to ask him
for preliminary sketches for the school,
and almost at the same time he received
a polite note from the brokers calling
his attention to his debt. He went at
once to Graves 's office, and asked the
contractor for the loan, saying that he
was to have the school and should be
put to extraordinary expenses in his
office for the next few months. The
contractor let him have the money read-
ily enough on his personal note. Graves
did not speak of the hotel, and for the
time the school had driven all else from
the architect's mind. He was kept
busy these weeks by consultations with
the trustees and the director of the
school, getting their ideas about the
building. One morning the newspapers
had an item, saying that "F. J. Hart,
the prominent young architect, had re-
ceived the commission for building the
Jackson Institute, and was engaged in
drawing plans for a magnificent struc-
ture, which in luxury and completeness
would outrank any similar institution
in the country." Before noon Hart
received a curt command from Judge
Phillips to call at his office, and fore-
seeing trouble with the trustees about
the newspaper paragraph, he went
scowling into the draught ing-room.
"Some of you boys must have been
talking loose about what 's going on in
this office," he said accusingly.
"The Tribune man had the story
straight enough when he came in here, "
Cook replied in defense. "He must
have got it from some one who knew
what he was talking about."
Hart went over to the judge's office
and tried to explain matters to the old
gentleman, who, beside having a great
dislike of "newspaper talk," felt that
the trustees were being deliberately
coerced into giving their commission to
The Common Lot.
639
this pushing young man. The architect
was forced to swallow some peppery
remarks about indelicate methods of
securing business. When he left the
judge, who was only half convinced of
his sincerity, he went to see Graves, and
vented his irritation on the contractor.
"You let things leak out of this
office. You got me into hot water by
giving out that story about the school."
"How so? It 's straight, ain't it?
You 've got the building? You said
so the other day when you came in here
to borrow that money."
"Well, it hasn't been formally set-
tled. They are touchy enough about
their old job. They 've asked me to
prepare the first sketches, — that 's all
so far."
"Oh! That 's all, is it? " the con-
tractor remarked coldly. "I thought
you had the job in your inside pocket
from the way you talked the other day."
Hart's face reddened as he stam-
mered, —
"It 'sail right. They are sure to take
me, only they are a little slow, and I
don't want to seem to force them."
Graves continued to examine the man
before him with his shrewd little eyes,
and Hart realized that the contractor
had given the news to the papers for
the precise purpose of finding out where
the trustees stood.
"Well, when you get ready to build,
I expect we shall be doing a good deal
of business together, " Graves remarked
tentatively.
The architect moved nervously in his
chair.
"We shall want you to bid, of course.
I don't know yet whether the trustees
mean to let the contracts as a whole."
"They '11 do pretty much what you
say, won't they? Ain't one of them
your cousin ? "
"Yes."
"Well, I want that contract. Can't
you fix it so 's I can get it ? "
Hart knew altogether too well what
the contractor meant. An architect
has it in his power to draw his specifi-
cations in such a manner that only a few
favored contractors will dare to bid. If
outsiders venture to bid for the work,
they cannot with safety go low enough
to get the contract. In the case of a
large building this is a more difficult
manoauvre to manage than with less
important work. Yet even with a build-
ing like the school, contractors would
be chary of bidding against a man who
was as closely identified with the ar-
chitect as Graves was with Hart.
"They say now," Hart protested,
"that nobody else gets a show in my
office."
"I don't believe you see what there
might be in this for you, Mr. Hart ! "
the contractor persisted.
A stenographer interrupted them at
that point, and the architect had a few
moments to think. He knew better
than any one else the devious methods
of the contractor, and it occurred to
him that this would be a good time to
sever his close connection with the
Graves Construction Company. He
would, of course, allow Graves to bid
on the school contracts, but would show
him no favors. Yet the contractor's
last words made him reflect. There
was the hotel with its unknown possi-
bilities of large returns. Moreover, the
Graves Construction Company was no
longer the weak enterprise that it had
been five years before. Graves had
made a great deal of money these last
prosperous years, and his "corporation "
was one of the largest of its kind in
the city. It would be stupid to break
with the man altogether.
"Come, this ain't quiet enough here !
Let 's step over to Burke's and talk it
out," the contractor suggested, looking
up from the papers the stenographer
had brought in.
So the two men went across the street
to Burke's, which was a quiet sort of
drinking-place, frequented by the bet-
ter class of sporting men. In the rear
there were a number of little rooms,
640
The Common Lot.
where whispered conversations intended
for but two pairs of ears were often
held. When the negro attendant had
wiped the mahogany tahle and brought
them their whiskey, Graves began : —
* "Mr. Hart, I 'm going to give you
the chance of your life to make a lump
of money, sure and quick, and no gold-
brick proposition, either."
Graves poured himself a drink, and
meditatively twirled the small glass
between his fat fingers.
"You do the right thing by me in
this school job, and I '11 see that you
are properly fixed on the hotel scheme. "
The details of the plan came cau-
tiously and slowly from the contractor,
while Hart listened in a non-committal
frame of mind. The thing proposed
was really very simple. The architect
was to draw the school specifications so
that only a few firms would bid, and of
these only one or two would be genuine
competitors. The contractor would see
to it that there were enough bidders at
approximately his own figure to prevent
suspicion on the part of the trustees.
In return for this favor, Graves offered
a large block of stock in the hotel com-
pany, "for the plans of the hotel,"
which he was ready to guarantee would
be worth a certain sum.
Of course there was an unspecified
item in the transaction, which was per-
fectly obvious to the architect. If the
contractor was ready to make these
terms in order to obtain the school,
there must be enough in the job above
the legitimate profit on the contract to
make it well worth his while. The
architect saw, less sharply, that this
extra profit would be made with his
professional connivance. It would be
impossible to get the trustees to accept
bids so high that the contractor could
reap his profit and still do the work up
to the specifications. It would be ne-
cessary to specify needlessly elaborate
steelwork, cut stone, and interior finish,
with the understanding that the Graves
Company would not be forced to live up
to these gilt-edged specifications. It
might be necessary, even, to prepa
two sets of specifications for the mor
important parts of the contract, — one
for the bidding, and one for the use of
the sub-contractors.
Hart smoked and listened, whil
Graves, having finished the outline of his
plan, spoke of the profit to the architect
"If you want, I '11 agree to take the
hotel stock off your hands at par fror
time to time as the two buildings
up. You can figure out now wha
you '11 make ! It will not be far froi
seventy thousand dollars, what with yoi
commissions and the stock. And I
guarantee, Hart, that you '11 have
trouble. That drunken Dutchman a
work over any details that have to
fixed, — my own expense. Nothing
need go through your office that ain't
first-class and regular."
The plan seemed perfectly simpl
and the architect's imagination fastene
on the big bait which the contract
held out. Graves repeated slowly
his thick tones : —
"A year, or say eighteen montl:
from now, you '11 have about seventy-
five thousand dollars in the bank."
That would be capital! The lack
capital had tripped him at every ti
With that amount of money, he coi
plant his feet firmly on the earth
prepare to spring still higher.
"Of course," Graves continuec
"you 'd stand by me, — help me 01
with the trustees if there was
kick."
In other words, for the term of
year or eighteen months, he would be
this contractor's creature. But the
architect was thinking of something
else. . . .
The line between what is honest and
dishonest in business is a difficult one
to plot. From generation to generation
our standards alter in the business world
as elsewhere, and to-day men will do
unblushingly, and with the approval of
their fellows, that which in another gei
The Common Lot.
641
eration will, doubtless, be a penitentiary
offense. Business is warfare, and what-
ever men may say on Sundays, the hardy
man of business will condone a thrifty
sin of competition sooner than any
other sin. Every one of the fighters
in the battle knows how hard it is to
make a dollar honestly or dishonestly,
and he prefers to call certain acts "in-
delicate " or " unprofessional, " rather
than dishonest.
Of such "unprofessional " conduct
Hart had been guilty a number of times,
and the matter had not troubled him
greatly. But this arrangement, which
the contractor was urging, was of more
positive stripe. It involved outright
rascality, which, if it became known in
the community, might ruin his profes-
sional standing for life. He would be
taking a great risk to grasp that pro-
mised lump of money. While Graves
talked in his thick, guttural tones,
Hart was weighing this risk. The
whiskey that he had been drinking had
not obscured his vision in the least, al-
though it shed a rosier glow over the
desired capital. It must be admitted
that the architect gave little thought to
the trustees or to his uncle's bequest.
It would have pleased him, if he had
considered it at all, to make a good
round hole in his uncle's millions, of
which the old man had deprived him.
And as for the trustees, they were
shrewd men of the world, quite able to
take care of themselves.
But, instinctively, he recoiled from
the act. He would much prefer a clean,
honorable, "high-class " career. If he
could have secured money enough to
satisfy his ambitions without resort to
such knavery as this, it would have been
much pleasanter. But in one way or
another he must make money, and make
it more rapidly and more abundantly
than he had been doing. That was
success! When he had come to this
point, he had already consented with
himself. . . .
They had been sitting there nearly
VOL. xcm. — NO. 559. 41
two hours, but latterly little had been
said. The contractor was patient and
diplomatic. Finally he asked, "Well,
Hart, what do you say ? "
Hart lighted another cigar before
replying, and then replied deliberately,
"I will think over what you say. I
understand that the stock is given me
for my commission on the hotel, and
will be worth a fixed sum ? "
"That 'sit!"
Then they went out into the street
without further words. Hart returned
to his office, examined his mail, wrapped
up his first sketches for the school, and
set out for the train. The deal with
Graves unconsciously filled his thoughts
and made him feel strange to himself.
He thought less of the practical detail
of the transaction than of certain spe-
cious considerations concerning the mo-
rality of what he was going to do.
Business was war, he said to himself
again and again, and in this war only
the little fellows had to be strictly
honest. The big ones, those that gov-
erned the world, stole, lied, cheated
their fellows openly in the market.
The Bushfields took their rake-off; the
Rainbows were the financial pimps, who
fattened on the -vices of the great
industrial leaders. Colonel Raymond
might discharge a man on the C. R. & N.
who stole fifty cents or was seen to enter
a bucket shop, but in the reorganization
of the Michigan Northern ten years pre-
viously, he and his friends had pocketed
several millions of dollars, and had won
the lawsuits brought against them by
the defrauded stockholders.
It was a world of graft, the architect
judged cynically. Old Powers Jack-
son, it was said in Chicago, would cheat
the glass eye out of his best friend in
a deal. He, too, would follow in the
path of the strong, and take what was
within his reach. He would climb
hardily to the top, and then who cared ?
That gospel of strenuous effort, which
our statesmen and orators are so fond
of shouting forth, has its followers in
642
The Common Lot.
the little Jackson Harts. Only, in put-
ting forth their strong right arms, they
often thrust them into their neighbors'
pockets! And the irresponsible great
ones, who have emerged beyond the
reign of law, have their disciples in all
the strata of society, — down, down to
the boy who plays the races with the
cash in his employer's till.
The architect went home to his wife
and children with the honest love that
he bore them. If they had entered his
mind in connection with this day's ex-
perience, he would have believed that
largely for their sakes, for their ad-
vancement in the social scheme of things,
he had engaged upon a toilsome and
disagreeable task. For he did not like
slippery ways.
XVIII.
Hart's design for the school had
been accepted by the trustees, and the
plans were placed on exhibition in the
Art Institute. Little knots of people
— students, draughtsmen, and young
architects — gathered in the room on
the second floor where the elevations
had been hung, and had their say about
the plans. Occasionally a few older men
and women, interested in the nobler
parts of civic life, drifted into the room,
having stolen some moments from a
busy day to see what the architect had
done with his great opportunity.
"Gee! Ain't it a hummer, now!"
exclaimed one of Wright's men, who
had known Hart in the old days. "He
let himself out this time, sure. It will
cover most two blocks."
"The main part of the design is
straight from the Hotel de Ville," one
of the young architects objected dis-
dainfully. He and his friends thought
there were many better architects in the
city than F. Jackson Hart, and grum-
bled accordingly. "I bet I could find
every line in the design from some
French thing or other. Hart 's an awful
thief: he can't think for himself."
"Where is the purpose of the struc-
ture expressed ? " another demanded.
"It would do just as well for the ad-
ministration building of a fair as for a
school!" . . .
"A voluptuous and ornamental de-
sign ; the space is wickedly wasted in
mere display. The money that ought
to go into the school itself will be eaten
up in this great, flaunting building that
will cover all the land." . . .
"What have I been telling you?
Chicago ain't a village any more. A
few buildings like this and the univer-
sity ones, and the world will begin to
see what we are doing out here! "
"What 's the dome for? " . . .
"I say the people should have the
best there is." . . .
"Pull, pull, — that 's what 's writ-
ten all over this plan ! "
Even Wright, who happened to be in
the city, stepped into the Institute to
look at the plans. He studied them
closely for a few minutes, and then,
with a smile on his face, moved off.
Hart had, indeed, "let himself out."
It was to be a master work, and put
the architect into the higher ranks of
his profession. For the first time he
had felt perfectly free to create. As
often happens, when the artist comes
to this desired point and looks into his
soul, he finds nothing there. The de-
sign was splendid, in a sense, — very
large and imposing: an imperial flight
of steps, which fastened the spectator's
eye ; a lofty dome ; and two sweeping
wings to support the central mass.
Nevertheless, the architect had not es-
caped from his training : it was another
one of the Beaux Arts exercises that
Wright used to "trim." Years hence
the expert would assign it to its proper
place in the imitative period of our arts
as surely as the literary expert has al-
ready placed there the poet Longfellow.
Though Hart had learned much in the
The Common Lot.
643
past six years, it had been chiefly in
the mechanics of his art: he was a
cleverer architect, but a more wooden
artist. The years he had spent in the
workshop of the great city had dead-
ened his sense of beauty. The clamor
and excitement and gross delight of
living had numbed his sense of the fine,
the noble, the restrained. He had
never had time to think, only to con-
trive, and facility had supplied the
want of ideas. Thus he had forgotten
Beauty, and managed to live without
that constant inner vision of her which
deadens bodily hunger and feeds the
soul of the artist.
So Wright read the dead soul in the
ambitious design.
Mrs. Phillips came rustling in with
friends, to whom she exhibited the plans
with an air of ownership in the architect.
"It 's the cleverest thing that has
been done in this city; every one says
so. I tell Harrison that he has me to
thank for this. It was a case of poetic
justice, too. You know the story?
One forgets so easily here; it 's hard to
remember who died last month ! Why,
the old man Jackson left pretty nearly
every cent of his money to found this
school. I think he was crazy, and I
should have fought the will if I had
been a relative. At any rate, it was
a nasty joke on this Mr. Hart, who
was his nephew, and every one thought
would be his heir.
"But he has made such a plucky
fight, got the respect of every one, gone
right along and made a splendid suc-
cess in his profession. He married
foolishly, too. Poor girl, not a cent,
and not the kind to help him one bit,
you know, — no style, can't say a word
for herself. She 's done a good deal
to keep him back, but he has managed
to survive that. I wonder he has n't
broken with her. I do, really! They
have n't a thing in common. They had
a pleasant home out in the Park, you
know, and a good position, — every one
knew them there. And what do you
think ? She made him give up his house
and come into town to live ! The Park
was too far away from her friends, or
something of the sort. Wanted to
educate her children in the city. I
believe it was jealousy of him. He was
popular and she was n't. No woman
will stand that sort of thing, of course.
" So now they have taken a house on
Scott Street, — a little, uncomfortable
box, the kind of place that is all hall
and dining-room. Of course they don't
have to live like that; he 's making
money. But she says she does n't want
to be bothered, — has ideas about sim-
ple living. The trouble is, she has n't
any ambition, and he 's brimful of it.
He could get anywhere, if it weren't
for her. It 's a shame ! I don't believe
she half appreciates even this. Is n't
it splendid ? He has such large ideas !
" Venetia is thick with her, of course.
You might know she would be ! It 's
through Mrs. Hart she meets those
queer, tacky people. I tell you, the
woman counts much more than the man
when it comes to making your way in
the world; don't you think so? " . . .
And with further words of praise for
the plans and commiseration for the
architect, the widow wandered into the
next room with her friends, then de-
scended to her carriage, dismissing art
and life together.
Helen made a point of taking the
boys to see their father's work, and
explained carefully to them what it all
meant. They followed her open-eyed,
tracing with their little fingers the main
features of the design as she pointed
them out, and saying over the hard
names. It was there Venetia Phillips
found her, seated before the large sketch
of the south elevation, dreaming, while
the boys, their lesson finished, had
slipped into the next room to look at
the pictures.
"Have you seen my mother? " she
asked, seating herself beside Helen.
644
The Common Lot.
. . . "Well, well, our Jackie has done
himself proud this time, hasn't he?
He 's a little given to the splurge, don't
you think ? "
Helen did not answer. She did not
like to admit even to herself that her
, husband's greatest effort was a failure.
Yet she was a terribly honest woman,
and there was no glow in her heart.
Indeed, the school and all about it had
become unpleasant to her, covered as
it was with sordid memories of her hus-
band's efforts to get the work. Lat-
terly there had been added to these the
almost daily bickerings with the trus-
tees, which her husband reported. The
plans had not been accepted easily!
" All the same, Jack 's got some good
advertising out of it, " Venetia con-
tinued, noticing Helen's silence. "The
newspapers are throwing him polite re-
marks, I see. But I want to talk to
you about something else. Mamma has
been losing a lot of money ; bad invest-
ments made in boom times ; sure things,
you know, like copper and steel. She 's
very much pressed, and she wants to
put my money in to save some of the
things. Uncle Harry is raging, and
asks me to promise him not to let her
have a cent. Stanwood has come home,
— there doesn't seem to be anything
else for him ! It 's all rather nasty.
I don't know what to do: it seems low
to hold your mother up in her second
youth. And yet the pace Mrs. Phillips
keeps would finish my money pretty
soon. It 's a pity Mrs. Raymond won't
die and give mother a chance to make
a good finish! "
"Venetia!"
"What 's the harm in my saying
what all the world that knows us is say-
ing? It 's been a ten years' piece of
gossip. I feel sorry for her, too. It
must be rough to get along in life and
see you have muckered your game. . . .
Do you know, I am terribly tempted to
let her have the money, all of it, and
skip out. Perhaps some of these days
you '11 read a little paragraph in the
morning paper, — ' Mysterious Disap-
pearance of a Weil-Known Young So-
ciety Woman ! ' Would n't that be real
sport ? Just to drop out of everything,
and take to the road ! "
"What would you do?"
"Anything, everything, — make a
living. Don't you think I could do
that? " She embroidered this theme
fancifully for a time, and then lapsed
into silence. Finally she burst forth
again, "Good Lord, why can't we get
hold of life before it 's too late? It's
going on all around us, — big, and rich,
and full of blood. And folks like me
sit on the bank, eating a picnic lunch. "
" Perhaps, " mused Helen, " it would
be different if one had to earn the
lunch. "
"Who knows? Will you try it?
Will you cut loose from Jackie ? "
As they descended the broad flight
of steps to the street, Venetia laid her
hand on the older woman's arm.
"Tell Jackie we are all proud of
him. Mamma brags of him daily. . . .
And look out for the paragraph in the
paper. They 'd give me a paragraph,
don't you think?"
The winter twilight had descended
upon the murky city, filling the long
vistas of the cross streets with a veil of
mystery. The roar of the place mount-
ed to the clouds above, which seemed
to reverberate with the respirations of
the Titan beneath. Here in the heart of
the city, life clamored with a more di-
rect note than in any other city of the
world. Men were struggling fiercely
for their desires, and their cries ascend-
ed to the dull heavens.
Helen walked home with the boys,
soothed by the human contact of the
streets. There was something exhil-
arating to her in the jostle of the
throng, the men and women leaving
their labors, bent homewards for the
night. Her heart expanded near them,
those who won their daily bread by the
toil of the day.
The Common Lot.
645
It was quite true, what the widow
had said. It was she who had willed
to return to the city from the pleasant
niche where she had spent her married
life, desiring in the emptiness of her
heart to get closer to the vast life of a
human people, to feel once more the
common lot of man. So she had taken
the little house on Scott Street, and re-
duced their living to the simplest scale,
declaring that she wanted her time for
herself and her children. Her husband
was so busy that he hardly noticed any
change in her as yet. They went out
less than they had gone in previous
years, and sometimes he thought the
people he found calling on his wife were
"queer." Her interest in a new kind
of education for the children bored him.
She seemed to be going her own way
without thought of him, and now and
then he wondered what it meant. He
did not like aggressive, faddish women ;
he wanted women to be personal and
sympathetic, with a touch of "style,"
social tact, and a little dash. • . . .
To-night he had come from his office
early, and while he waited for Helen
he looked about the little drawing-room
disapprovingly, with a sense of ag-
grieved discomfort. Helen was taking
to economy and simplicity too serious-
ly. He looked at his wife closely when
she came in with the boys. She seemed
older, more severe in face than he had
thought, than her photograph on his
office desk said. When this school
business was done with, they must run
over to Europe for a few months' vaca-
tion, and then live differently on their
return. . . .
" Nell, " he said when they were alone,
"it 's settled at last. We let the con-
tracts to-day ! "
" For the school ? " she asked . " You
must be glad of that ! "
Her lips, which curved so tenderly,
had grown strangely firm. He put his
arm over her shoulder and drew her
toward him.
"Yes, it 's a great relief! When
the building is finished we must have a
spree, and get to be lovers once more. "
"Yes, dear. . . . I 've been to the
Institute with the boys to have them
see the plans."
"They are well spoken of. I saw
Wright to-day for a moment. He
stopped to congratulate me, but I
could n't tell what he really thought.
Well, after all the trouble with them,
I got pretty much what I wanted,
thanks to Everett and the doctor. Ev-
erett 's been a good friend all through.
The idea of the others kicking so hard
because the thing was going to cost a
little more than they had made up their
minds to spend on the building! Pem-
berton thinks he knows all about archi-
tecture. It 's a pity he could n't have
drawn the plans himself! "
"But you saved your design."
"Yes, I 've won the second round
all right! "
In his joy over the thought he put
his strong arms about his wife and
lifted her bodily from the floor, as he
had often done, boyishly, in the years
before. Holding her close to him he
kissed her lips and neck. She returned
his kisses, but the touch of her lips was
cool. She seemed limp in his arms,
and he felt vaguely the want of some-
thing. She was less loving, less pas-
sionate than ever before. He missed
the abandon, the utter self-forgetful-
ness, the rush of ecstatic emotion, which
from the first moment of their love had
made her for him all woman, the woman
of women. . . . He let her slip from
his embrace and looked at her. Was
it age? Was it the penalty of living,
which dampens the fire of passion and
dulls desire? He was troubled, dis-
tressed for the loss of something pre-
cious that was get ting beyond his reach,
perhaps had gone forever.
"Oh!" he exclaimed. "It's bad
to be always on the dead push. Come !
Let 's go somewhere and have dinner
and a bottle of champagne the way we
used to ! "
646
The Common Lot.
She hesitated a moment, unwilling
to disappoint him.
"I can't very well to-night, Francis.
I promised Morton Carr I should be
home this evening. He wants me to
help raise some money for his new
building. "
"Oh! " he said, strangely wounded
in his egotism. "I remember you said
something about it."
XIX.
Late in March the corner stone for
the Jackson Institute was laid. It was
a desolate winterish day, and the prai-
rie wind chilled to the bone the little
group of interested people seated on
the platform erected for the occasion.
There were brief speeches by Judge
Phillips and Dr. Everest, and an ad-
dress by a celebrated college president
on the "new education." To Helen,
who sat just behind him, in sight of
the piles of excavated sand, and the
dirty brick walls of the neighboring
stores, the scene was scarcely in har-
mony with the orator's glowing gener-
alizations. "The mighty energies of
this industrial cosmopolis are answer-
ing to the call of man's ideals." . . .
Cook, who was standing by the mason's
windlass, caught her eye and smiled.
He looked brisk and happy, and she
could fancy him calling out, "Hey!
Ain't this the best yet? F. J. Hart
is all right."
The architect, smartly dressed for
the occasion in a new frock coat and
shining silk hat, stepped forward,
dusted the upper surface of the great
stone with a brush, and handed the
judge a silver trowel. Cook pushed up
to them a bucket of mortar, into which
the old man thrust the trowel, and
tremblingly bespattered the stone. The
windlass creaked, and down came the
massive block of Indiana sandstone, cov-
ering the recess into which had been
stuffed some records of the present day.
Then the architect and Cook busied
themselves adjusting the block, while
the judge stepped backward to his seat,
a look of relief coming over his red face,
as if he felt that he had virtually ex-
ecuted the trust left him by his old
friend.
As the gathering dispersed, Helen's
eye fell upon a great wooden sign sur-
mounting the workmen's shed: THE
GRAVES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY —
GENERAL CONTRACTORS — CHICAGO
AND NEW YORK.
This was the company that had final-
ly secured the general contract for the
building. As Helen knew, there had
been vexatious delays over the bids.
The first figures had been very much in
excess of the sum the trustees had
agreed to spend upon the building.
They had forced the architect to modi-
fy his plans somewhat, and to ask for
bids again. Pemberton had been espe-
cially obstinate, and Hart had grum-
bled about him, — "Why does the old
duffer chew the rag over a couple of
hundred thousand, when they have over
three millions anyway? It does n't
come out of his pocket! " At last,
after some wrangling, the trustees had
accepted the lowest bid, though it was
still considerably beyond the figure they
had set. Hart regarded it as a tri-
umph: he had saved substantially the
integrity of his design, and the Graves
Company got the contract.
Now all was serene. From the hour
that the contract was signed, the build-
ing rose from nothingness by leaps and
bounds. Graves was always rapid in
his operations, and for this building he
seemed to have made every preparation
beforehand. The labor situation, which
was still unsettled, caused him no de-
lay. His rivals said that he had the
heads of the unions on his pay rolls, and
could build when other contractors were
tied up by strikes. Other firms could
not get their steel from the mills for
months, but Graves had some mysteri-
The Common Lot.
647
cms way of securing his material when
he wanted it. The day after the cor-
ner stone was laid he had an army of
men at work; early in June the walls
were up to the roof trusses ; by the end
of July the great edifice was complete-
ly roofed in, and the plasterers were at
work.
The contracts once signed, the judge
and Wheeler seemed to regard their
responsibilities as over. Hollister, who
had been in poor health latterly, left
everything to the others. But Pem-
berton was the bane of the architect's
life. He visited Hart's office almost
daily, looked carefully at every voucher
before ordering it paid, and spent long
afternoons at the works. He examined
the building from foundation to roof
with his thrifty New England eye, and
let no detail escape him, stickling over
unimportant trifles, and delaying the
orders for extras or alterations. The
whole operation of modern building was
an unknown language to him. He knew
that he was ignorant of what was going
on before his eyes, and his helplessness
made him improperly suspicious of the
architect and the contractor. Many
a time he strained Hart's habitual tact.
They nearly came to blows over some
window-frames, which the architect had
seen fit to alter without consulting the
building committee.
One morning Hart found the trustee
at the school in company with a stranger,
who made notes in a little memorandum
book. Pemberton nodded curtly to the
architect, and, as he was preparing to
leave, remarked casually : —
"This is Mr. Trimble, Mr. Hart.
Mr. Trimble is an engineer, who has
done work for me from time to time.
He will look through the works and
make a report. Mr. Trimble will not
interfere with you in any way, Mr.
Hart. He will report to me."
The architect's face grew white with
suppressed rage, and his lips trembled
as he answered : —
"What is your reason for taking this
step, Mr. Pemberton? When I was
given the commission, nothing was said
about having a superintendent. If
there is to be one, he should report to
me. As you know quite well, I have
devoted my entire time to this building,
and given up other work in order that
I might be out here every day. I shall
speak to the other trustees about this,
and I '11 not stand the insult, Mr.
Pemberton ! "
"Tut, tut, no insult, Mr. Hart.
You must know that it 's quite usual
in work of this magnitude for the own-
ers to have their representative on the
works. There will be no interference
with you or the contractor, if the work
goes right."
The architect swallowed his anger
for the time, answering sulkily, "Mr.
Graves will take no orders except from
me, of course. The contracts are so
drawn."
"Eh!" Pemberton exclaimed. "I
hope there will be no occasion to alter
that arrangement."
The architect bowed and left the
building.
"Snarling, prying old fogy," he
spluttered to his wife, who was waiting
outside in the automobile. "Let him
put in his superintendent. I guess we
can give him a run for his money."
The woman's heart sank. Somehow
this school, this bit of great-hearted
idealism on the part of the old man she
loved, had thus far stirred up a deal of
mud.
Pemberton did not think it necessary
to discuss with the architect his reasons
for engaging Mr. Trimble as superin-
tendent. After the contract had been
let, the trustees had received a num-
ber of anonymous letters, which made
charges that all had not been square in
getting the bids for the building. These
letters had gone into the waste-basket,
as mere cowardly attacks from some
disgruntled contractor. Then, one day
while the building was still in the
648
The Common Lot.
rough, and the tile was going in, Pem-
berton overheard one of the laborers
say to his mate, —
"Look at that stuff, now. It ain't
no good at all," and he gave the big
yellow tile a kick with his foot; "it 's
nothin' but dust. Them 's rotten bad
tiles, I tell yer."
And the other Paddy answered re-
flectively, scratching his elbow the
while, —
"It '11 go all the same. Sure, it 's
more money in his pocket. Ain't that
so, boss ? "
He appealed to Pemberton, whom he
took for one of the passers-by gaping
idly at the building.
" What do you mean ?" Pemberton
demanded sharply.
" Mane ? The less you pay the more
you git."
" Hist, you fule, " the other one
warned, twisting his head in the direc-
tion of the boss mason.
Pemberton was not the man to take
much thought of a laborer's talk. But
the words remained in his mind, and, a
few weeks later, happening to meet the
superintendent of a large construction
company in the smoking - car of the
Forest Park train, he asked the man
some questions about fireproof building.
"Why did your people refuse to bid
the second time ? " he inquired finally.
"They saw it was just a waste of
time and money, " the man replied
frankly.
"What do you mean by that? "
" Why, the job was slated for Graves,
• — that was all. It was clear enough
to us. There 's mighty little that goes
out of that office except to Graves."
"Is that so? I asked Mr. Hart
particularly to have your company bid
on the contracts."
Then the man became confidential,
and explained how a certain ambigui-
ty in the wording of the specifications
made it risky for a contractor to bid
unless he knew just how the architect
would treat him; for the contractor
might easily "get stuck " for much
more than the possible profits, though
bidding in perfect good faith. The man
was willing enough to talk, once started
on the subject, and in the course of half
an hour he explained to the layman
some of the chicanery of the building
business.
"So you see, Mr. Pemberton, the
contractor, to protect himself when he
does n't know his man, bids pretty high,
and then the favored contractor can
safely go a good bit lower. He has an
understanding with the architect, may-
be, and it all depends on how the speci-
fications are going to be interpreted."
And he told other things, — how some
of the firms who had bid had since got
parts of the general contract from the
Graves Company, but on a new set of
specifications.
"It 's queer," he ended finally.
"We can't see how they '11 make a cent
on the contract, unless Graves is going
to rot it clear through."
He explained what he meant by "rot-
ting " it, — the use of cheap grades of
materials and inferior labor, from the
foundation stones to the cornice. In
other words, the building would be a
"job."
"For those specifications called for
a first-class building, awful heavy steel
work and cabinet finish, and all that.
If it 's built according to specifications,
you 're going to have a first-class school
all right ! "
The result of this chance conversa-
tion was that after consultation with
Judge Phillips, Pemberton sent to Bos-
ton for the engineer Trimble, whom he
knew to be absolutely honest and capa-
ble.
When Hart left Pemberton, he went
directly to Wheeler's office and ex-
ploded to his cousin. On his way to
the city his anger at the affront offered
to him had entirely hidden the thought
of the disagreeable complications that
might follow. He took a high stand
The Common Lot.
649
with Wheeler. But the cool lawyer,
after hearing his remonstrances, said
placidly, —
"If Pemberton wants this man to
go over the building, I don't see how
you can prevent it. And I don't see
the harm in it, myself. I suppose
everything is all right. See that it is,
— that's your business. Pemberton
would be a bad man to deal with, if he
found any crooked work. You 'd bet-
ter look sharp after that fellow Graves. "
The architect assured his cousin that
there was no need to worry on that
score. But he began to foresee the
dangers ahead, and felt a degree of com-
fort in the fact that Graves had only
that week paid him in cash for the
second block of his Glenmore hotel
"stock." With the previous payment,
he had now thirty-five thousand dollars
lying in his bank, and a large payment
on the commission for the school would
soon be due him.
Trouble was not long in coming!
Trimble, who was a quiet little man,
and looked like a bookseller's clerk,
was waiting for Hart one morning at
the office of the works. He made some
pointed inquiries about the plumbing
specifications. There seemed to be im-
portant discrepancies between the copy
of the specifications at the works and
the copy which Pemberton had given
him from the office of the trustees.
"Yes, a good many changes were
authorized. There were good reasons
for making them," Hart responded
gruffly.
The little man made no remarks ; he
seemed to have inquired out of curios-
ity. Then he asked questions about
some blue prints which did not corre-
spond with the written specifications,
explaining that he had gone to the
mill where the interior finish was being
turned out, and had found other discrep-
ancies in the blue prints of the wood-
work. Hart answered indifferently that
he would find a good many such changes,
as was customary in all buildings. At
this point Graves arrived ; he came into
the little shanty and looked Trimble
over without speaking. After the en-
gineer had left, Graves turned to the
architect, an ugly frown on his heavy
face, —
" Say, is that little cuss goin' to make
trouble here? "
Hart explained briefly what had hap-
pened.
" Do you think we could fix him ? "
the contractor asked without further
comment.
The architect noticed the "we " and
sulked.
"I guess you 'd better not try. He
does n't look like the kind you could
fix. It 's just as well that most of the
work is done, for it seems to me he
means trouble."
"All the finish and decoratin' is
comin', ain't it? " the contractor
growled. "I tell you what, if he holds
up the mill work, there '11 be all kinds
of trouble. I won't stand no nonsense
from your damned trustees." He swore
out his disgust, and fumed, until Hart
said : —
"Well, you '11 have to do the best
you can ! "
The Glenmore hotel was going up
rapidly, and he thought of the twenty
thousand dollars which would be com-
ing to him on the completion of that
building, — if all went well. But if
there were a row, there would be no fur-
ther profits for him on the hotel.
"The best I can!" Graves broke
forth. "I guess you '11 have to take
care of them. You 'd better see your
cousin and get him to call this feller
off, or there '11 be trouble."
" I have seen Wheeler, " the archi-
tect admitted.
"Well," the contractor blustered,
"if they want a fight, let 'em come on.
There '11 be a strike on this building
in twenty-four hours, I can tell you, and
it '11 be two years before they can get
their school opened ! "
With this threat, the contractor left
650
The Common Lot.
the office, and Hart went over to the
great building, which had become a
thorn in his flesh these last weeks. It
was not a bad piece of work, after all,
as Chicago building goes, he reflected.
Even if Graves had cut the work in
places, and had made too much money
on the steel, the stone, and here and
there all over, the edifice would an-
swer its purpose well enough, and he
had no special interest in the everlast-
ing qualities of his structures. No-
thing was built to stand in this city.
Life moved too swiftly for that!
For several weeks, as the end of
August came near, there was a lull,
while Pemberton was in the East on his
vacation. The work on the school went
forward as before; even the irritation
of seeing Trimble's face was removed,
for he had ceased to visit the works.
Then, the first week in September, the
storm burst. There came to the archi-
tect's office a peremptory summons to
meet the trustees the next afternoon.
XX.
Powers Jackson had given the old
Jackson homestead and farm in Vernon
Falls to Helen, and with it a small leg-
acy of twelve thousand dollars "as a
maintenance fund. " She had opened the
house but once or twice since her mar-
riage because Jackson was always too
busy to take a long vacation, and she did
not like to leave him. Latterly she
had thought about the old man's gift
a good deal, and there had been some
talk of her spending the summer in
Vernon Falls with the children and
her mother. Instead of this, they had
gone to the Shoreham Club for a few
weeks, putting off the journey east till
the fall.
She had never touched the legacy,
leaving it in Everett Wheeler's hands,
securely invested, and had paid what
was needed to maintain the old place
from her allowance. Now, however, a
number of repairs had accumulated, and
it occurred to her one day, when she
was in the city, to find out from
Wheeler how much surplus she had at
her disposal. They had joked a good
deal about her estate, and the lawyer
had scolded her for not coming to his
office to examine the papers and see
what he was doing with her money.
It was late in the afternoon when she
had finished other, more urgent errands,
and, turning into the lofty La Salle
Street building, was whirled up to the
twelfth floor. The middle-aged ste-
nographer in Wheeler's office looked up
on her entrance, and said that the law-
yer had not left, but was engaged with
some gentlemen. Would she wait?
She sat down in the quiet, carpeted
outer office. From this radiated several
small offices, the doors of which were
open. One door only was closed, and
through the ground-glass panel in this
she could see the dark forms of sev*
eral men. Presently the stenographer
pushed her papers into the drawer of
her desk, and fetched her hat and
coat.
" I think they must be most through, "
she remarked pleasantly. "You go
right in when they come out."
Then she gathered up her gloves and
left. Little noise came from the hall.
The vast hive seemed to be deserted at
this hour, and few places in the city
were so quiet and lonesome as this sober
law office. The murmur of voices in the
inner room was the only sound of life.
Gradually the voices grew louder, but
Helen paid no attention to them until a
man's voice, clear and shrill with exas-
peration, penetrated distinctly to whet
she sat.
"No, Wheeler! " the man almc
shouted. "We won't compromise this.
I won't have it covered up, white
washed. We '11 go to the bottom, her
and now. Let us find out what all this
double-dealing means. Let us know,
now, whether the work on that build-
ing is being done honestly or not, ar
The Common Lot.
651
whether our architect is working for us
or for the contractor against us."
It was Pemberton's voice, and Helen
recognized it. From the first words she
had grasped the arms of her chair, —
a sudden clutch at her heart. She held
herself rigid, while behind the door a
confused murmur of men all talking at
once drowned Pemberton's voice. She
tried to think whether she should leave
the office, but her strength had gone.
She trembled in her chair. Present-
ly Pemberton's high voice rang out
again : —
"No, sir! We 've given you this
opportunity to explain your conduct and
clear yourself. You have n't done it,
sir! You try to bluster it through.
There 's something wrong in this busi-
ness, and we shall find out what it is.
Not another dollar will be paid out on
your vouchers until our experts have
gone through all the papers and exam-
ined every foot of the construction so
far done. No, Wheeler, I will resign
if you like. You asked me to join you.
I was glad to do so. I considered it an
honor and a duty, and I have made sac-
rifices for this work. But if I stay on
the board this thing must be cleared
up!"
Another high and angry voice an-
swered this time : —
"You 'd better not make loose
charges, Mr. Pemberton, until you are
in a position to prove what you say. I
won't stand your talk; I 'm going! "
Helen recognized her husband's voice,
and she got to her feet, still clutching
the chair. Then she moved forward
unsteadily toward the inner office. The
handle of the door moved a little, and
against the glass panel the form of a
man stood out sharply.
"What are you going to do about it ?
Sue Graves? Or sue me? You can
discharge me if you like. But I am
your agent, and have full powers. Re-
member that ! That 's the way the con-
tract is drawn. And if I back up
Graves, what are you going to do about
it? He 's got your agent's signature
for what he 's done. . . . You 'd better
hold your temper and talk sense." . . .
"Don't threaten me, sir! " Pember-
ton retorted. "I have all the proof
I want that you are a rascal, that you
have entered into a conspiracy with this
man Graves to swindle." . . .
There were sounds of a scuffle within
the office, — the noise of falling chairs,
the voices of excited men. Above all
the clamor rose the cool tones of
Wheeler, —
"Come, come, gentlemen! This is
not business."
As he spoke, a weight seemed to fall
against the door from the outside. The
man nearest the outer office, who hap-
pened to be Judge Phillips, opened the
door, and Helen fell, rather than walked,
into the office, her face white, her hands
stretched before her.
"Francis! Francis! " she called.
It was not her husband, however,
who sprang to her aid. He was too
startled to move. Wheeler, who was
leaning against his desk, leaped forward,
caught her, and carried her from the
room.
"Nell, Nell! " he muttered. "Any-
thing, rather than this ! "
Robert Herrick.
(To be continued.)
652
The Year In France.
THE YEAR IN FRANCE.
ENGLAND and France have as many
reasons to be polite to each other as
they have few reasons to love each other.
Their commercial relations are so inti-
mate and colossal that they can ill afford,
prudentially speaking, to be at odds.
Their natural and manufactured pro-
ducts seldom come into direct competi-
tion ; on the contrary, these products are
complementary to a remarkable degree.
England depends largely on the farms,
dairies, and vineyards of France for the
daily supplies of her market and table
(for butter, eggs, vegetables, fruits, and
wines), and on the industries of France
for various highly pi-ized articles of lux-
ury ; while France, conversely, depends
on the mines and factories of England
for such staples as cotton, woolen, and
rubber goods, iron, and coal. The trade
between the two countries amounts in an
average year to a round 2,000,000,000
francs, with a balance of upwards of
500,000,000 francs in France's favor.
The interchange of visits, last summer,
between Edward VII and President Lou-
bet, and between members of the French
and English parliaments and chambers
of commerce, and the arbitration treaty
resulting therefrom indicate that " the
powers that be " in politics and finance
recognize this mutual economic depen-
dence, and are disposed to prevent, by
keeping the question of commercial ad-
vantage constantly to the fore, — alas,
that no higher motive can be appealed
to ! — gratuitous bickerings and useless
displays of bad blood. They indicate
further that these same powers have suc-
ceeded in rendering acceptable to a ma-
jority of their respective compatriots this
eminently practical point of view. They
do not indicate that either nation has
experienced a radical change of mind or
heart. The two peoples continue to mis-
understand and misjudge each other as
they have for centuries. They hate each
other out of sheer atavism, naturally,
normally, — I had almost said righteous-
ly, — and will continue to hate each oth-
er, in all human probability, to the end
of time. They have merely acquiesced
provisionally (in the absence of any im-
mediate subject of disagreement) in the
official attitude of politeness, without
committing themselves to too close an
intimacy thereby ; very much as two
clever and ambitious women of the world
hold each other at a respectful distance,
while reiterating the most amiable com-
monplaces and lavishing the most en-
gaging smiles. Nothing has been par-
doned or forgotten ; and it will take very
little to engender a dangerous irritation,
to stir the ancient rancors, and destroy
an entente which is by no means an en-
tente cordiale.
The warm reception accorded King
Edward by Paris should be assigned no
special political significance. It was an
illustration of French good nature, first
of all, and, even so, was intended less
for Edward, King of England, than for
Edward, " the royal good fellow," — who
is a prodigious favorite with the Parisians
because they know he is genuinely fond
of Paris, and because they have the
pleasantest recollections of the escapades
of his much prolonged salad days. The
bulk of the Nationalists held aloof from
this reception ; indeed, one of the Na-
tionalist organs went to the length of
issuing just before his visit a special
number devoted entirely to an indignant
exposition of the reasons why this visit
should be resented by the French people.
The arbitration treaty is a Platonic
affair, full of loopholes, a sort of toy,
child's-play treaty, not to be mentioned
in the same breath, for instance, wit
the arbitration treaties in force betweer
certain South American states. Its adoj
The Year In France.
653
tion was disapproved in France by a
number of eminent citizens, not chauvin-
ists, on tbe ground that a treaty of so
little binding force was calculated to
create a feeling of false security in the
public mind.
At a time when every great power is
playing the bully in one part of the world
or another ; when Russia and Japan are
at war in the Orient (for the possession
— or control — of territory which be-
longs, in equity, to neither) ; and when
their respective allies, France and Eng-
land, are liable to be drawn into the
fight at any moment, the temptation to
dwell on the value of arbitration treaties
in general, and of the Anglo - French
arbitration treaty in particular, is not
strong. Rather the temptation is to belit-
tle both unduly. It is just possible, how-
ever, that the restriction thus far of the
Eastern conflict to the two original bel-
ligerents has been directly due to the
existence of this Anglo-French treaty,
jthe courteous restraint it has entailed
having just sufficed to check precipitate
action and allow time for the sober sec-
ond thought. If this is really the case,
its adoption is an achievement not to be
treated flippantly even though the war
pressure ultimately becomes too strong
for it. Certain it is that the immediate
intervention of both France and England
in a Russo-Japanese war would have
been well-nigh unavoidable had such a
war broken out six months before this
interchange of courtesies had occurred.
The visit of the King and Queen of
Italy to Paris in October, and the con-
clusion between Italy and France of an
arbitration treaty identical with the An-
glo-French treaty, were the culmination
of a series of friendly acts extending
over a term of years. For this reason,
and because it is based on sentiment as
well as business interest, and is rather an
occasion for expansion than for restraint,
the Franco-Italian reconciliation offers
more serious guarantees of stability than
the reconciliation between England and
France. The French and Italian peo-
ples were intended by nature to be
friends. They are not constitutionally
antipathetic, as are the French and
English, and, unlike the French and
English, they have more reasons (in
spite of several definite past sins of
omission and commission) to love than
to hate each other.
The salient fact of the past year in
French domestic politics has been the
persistence of the Combes ministry in
the Anti-clerical campaign inaugurated
by the Waldeck-Rousseau ministry, its
predecessor.
The avowed ultimate aim of the Anti-
clerical party led by M. Combes is no-
thing less than a complete monopoly of
education by the state, — a condition
which would make it as illegal for any
other agency than the government to
fabricate scholars as it is for any other
agency than the government to fabri-
cate matches and coins.
The Anti-clerical party proposes to
create, by the " laicization " of all
instruction, " a laical spirit," " a laical
conscience," — to borrow some of its pet
catchwords, — that will " restore the in-
tellectual and moral unity of France."
To this end, it classes the monastic
orders as " pure anachronisms," and
holds the monks up to abhorrence or
ridicule because they have " deliberately
repudiated their social obligations and
the responsibilities of marriage, thereby
cutting themselves off from the family
and society." It represents the Catholic
Church as necessarily "incompatible with
progress," as an intolerant and fanatical
" adversary of liberty, of democracy, and
of civilization ; " refers deprecatingly to
its " gross superstitions " and ominously
to its " dark conspiracies ; " character-
izes its doctrines as " corrupting and per-
nicious, calculated to deform the intelli-
gence of youth and pervert the French
spirit;" and accuses it of being, in
France, a troublesome and dangerous
654
The Year in France.
foreign substance in the body politic,
"a state within a state," "a Roman
state in the French state," " a theocratic
state in the democratic state."
In contradistinction, the Anti-clerical
party presents itself as "an evangelist
of enlightenment," " a defender of phil-
osophic truth," " a liberator of intelli-
gence," " an emancipator from the slav-
ery of superstition and from the murk of
obscurantism," " a protector of the child
and of the people," " a savior of the
rising generation " from " the contagion
of error," " the inaugurator of the reign
of Reason and Humanity " (capital R
and capital H) ; as " the lineal descen-
dant and vindicator of the Revolution,"
"the sole conservator of the true national
tradition," " the sole guardian of the na-
tional interest," " the only sure friend of
the Republic," " the bulwark of the cause
of liberty, justice, and the Patrie against
the clerical domination," " the champion
predestined to set France free from the
yoke of Rome," and " the sponsor of the
France of the future."
All this is very fine in leading arti-
cles and parliamentary eloquence. The
theory of the "Laical State" (I'tftat
La/ique) is not without a certain gran-
deur as a theory of political and social
unity. It is one of those large " general
ideas " which have always possessed a
peculiar fascination for Frenchmen, and
which have been from time immemorial
at once the glory and the bane of France ;
a fresh illustration of that French passion
for unity and system which has produced
a Louis XI, a Richelieu, a Mazarin, a
Napoleon, a Revolution, a Commune, a
Calvin, and an Auguste Comte. But,
unfortunately for the practical applica-
tion of this theory, and unfortunately for
tho public peace, unity, on one basis or
another, is also the ideal of the most
antagonistic elements in French politics,
superstitious veneration for abstract ideas
being common to them all. All the ag-
gressive political groups (the Royalists,
the Imperialists, the Radicals, the So-
cialists, and the Nationalists) clamor for
unity in the name of, and along the lines
of, their mutually exclusive creeds, and
are straining toward it in the measure
of their respective forces. All expound
their claims to superiority as a unifying
agency with similar, almost identical,
high-sounding phrases, and support their
positions with similar, almost identical,
arguments. All pretend to be the only
representatives of the genuine French
tradition and the saviors of the Patrie.
All would run the minds of all their
compatriots in their own particular
moulds, and all, if they could have
their way, would expel or disfranchise,
in the name of their particular unity,
all those who proved recalcitrant to the
moulding process.
Carried away by their excessive desire
to make the heterogeneous homogene-
ous, the Anti-clericals show themselves
curiously blind to the facts of French
history and contemporary life, as well
as curiously lacking in the sense of pro-
portion, in asserting that modern France
is the daughter of Free Thought and the
Revolution, and has no kinship whatever
with the church and the ancient regime ;
curiously wanting in discrimination in
not distinguishing more carefully than
they do between unity and uniformity,
between hostility to a ministry and hos-
tility to the Republic, and between Cleri-
calism that endeavors to undermine the
state and the religious devotion that
occupies itself logically and legitimately
with the training of Christian citizens ;
curiously obtuse in not sensing the hi
in or of making a parliament a judge
philosophic truth and error ; curiously
narrow, not to say naive, in assuming
that the work of religion is done in the
world, and that the era of pure reason
has arrived ; in considering the moral
unity of a people dependent on its re-
ligious unity ; above all, in fancying that,
in our complex and groping modern
civilization, any moral unity is possible
— or desirable — which does not admit
The Year in France.
655
diversity of intellect and temperament,
and which does not make ample allow-
ance for the relativity, the vanity even,
of knowledge. And were such a doc-
trinaire moral unity possible, — and de-
sirable, — a thousand times possible and
desirable, — the Anti-clerical party, or
any other party, would still be embark-
ing in a dubious adventure in undertak-
ing to establish it by force. The Pro-
crustean method of securing conformity
succeeds only by mutilating or destroy-
ing life.
In setting up an " orthodoxy of the
state " and an official standard of pro-
gress, in utilizing the finances and the
functionaries of the state for the propa-
gation of its dogmas, and in appealing
to the authority of the law to silence its
antagonists, Anti-clericalism renders it-
self guilty of the very sins which it lays
to the charge of Clericalism. Employed
to-day by the Anti-clericals against the
Catholics, such a procedure may logically
be employed by others, to-morrow, against
the Socialists, against the Jews, against
trade-unions, against benefit orders and
cooperative groups, against the Freema-
sons, against social settlements, against
literary, philanthropic, and charitable
societies, against women's clubs (imagine
it!), against any race or sect, group or
coterie whatsoever, no matter how color-
less, that is suspected (with or without
reason) of taking the slightest interest
in public affairs.
The Combes ministry, which came into
power in June, 1902, has so far outdone
the Waldeck-Rousseau ministry in radi-
calism and sectarianism, — and this is
saying a great deal, — that the latter
appears a ministry of conservatism and
tolerance in comparison. M. Combes
has been so arbitrary in the interpreta-
tion, and so needlessly harsh and hasty
in the execution, of the Waldeck-Rous-
seau law of 1901 against the Congrega-
tions, that M. Waldeck-Rousseau him-
self — here we should have the height
of the humorous if the situation were
not an extremely grave one — has felt
obliged to protest. M. Waldeck-Rous-
seau openly accuses his successor of
" seeking to obtain from the law of 1901
results for which it was in no way in-
tended," and of transforming, without
warrant, what was designed simply as
" a law of control " into a " law of ex-
clusion ; " and he entreats him to be
more respectful of legal forms if he
would not compromise hopelessly the
results already obtained.
M. Combes and his lieutenants have,
in truth, shown scant respect for legality
in their enterprise of laicization. They
have resorted to summary arrests, to the
violation of property rights, to encroach-
ments on the prerogatives of the com-
munes, to the invalidation of elections,
to dictatorial decrees and ordinances, to
the stifling of free parliamentary exami-
nation and discussion, to the distorting
of texts, and to the exhumation of obso-
lete statutes dating from the imperial
regime. They have stooped to unworthy
subterfuges, undignified quibbles, dis-
courteous personalities, and petty perse-
cutions. They have been guilty of bad
faith. They have proposed and, when
possible, passed retroactive laws and
laws of exception, laws of confiscation
and proscription, and laws putting out-
side the pale of the common law whole
classes of citizens, by the creation of civil
and political disabilities and personal
incapacities. They have exerted official
pressure amounting to intimidation on
the employees of the civil service and
even on the magistracy.
Three extraordinary things are to be
noted in this connection : —
1. That concrete liberties — all the
so-called fundamental liberties, in fact,
with the possible exception of that of
the press — are violated in the name of
Liberty in the abstract ; as if absolutism
were any less absolutism when exercised
in the interests of " moral unity " than
when exercised in the interests of a sov-
656
The Year in France.
ereign, and as if persecution were any
less persecution when practiced in the
name of Infallible Reason than when
practiced in the name of an Infallible
Church !
2. That tolerance is abrogated in the
name of " the modern spirit," when, in
reality, tolerance is the very essence of
the modern spirit. The theory upon
which French Anti-clericalism proceeds,
that error has no rights which truth is
bound to respect, is not a modern doc-
trine, but a doctrine of the autocratic
regimes of the past, which never hesi-
tated, " ' for the good of their souls and
the good of the Kingdom,' to tear the
children of Protestants and Jews away
from their parents, to be educated in the
faith of the monarch," or to exclude the
professors of " the so-called Reformed
Religion " from office - holding privi-
leges.
3. That the sentiments of a vast ma-
jority of the people are outraged, and
their wishes overruled, by the vigorous
and united action of a perfervid minor-
ity. " Neither art nor science is need-
ed," says La Bruyere, " to practice
tyranny." Had the author of the Car-
acteres known M. Combes and the
Third Republic, he would have modified
his dictum, for the tyranny of M. Combes
presupposes a phenomenal quantity and
quality of both " art and science."
Should M. Combes ever retire from of-
fice, — a supposition which seems at the
present moment highly improbable, — he
will make no mistake in devoting his
hard-earned leisure to writing his con-
fessions. The volume, which might well
take for its title-page
M. COMBES, THE PERFECT TYRANT
or
THE CURIOUS APATHY OP A GREAT PEOPLE
An Autobiographical Study
Treating of the
TYRAJfNY OF DEMOCRACY
by an
BX-TYBANT
would be an invaluable contribution to
the literature of democracy, and would
stand every chance of becoming in good
time as much of a classic, in its kind, as
Machiavelli's Prince.
The immediate consequences of the
Draconian regime of M. Combes (what-
ever fine and fair thing the ultimate re-
sult may prove to be) are nearly all de-
plorable.
It has provoked scenes of disorder in
the Chamber of Deputies that would in-
cline a person unfamiliar with the idio-
syncrasies of French politicians to be-
lieve that the end of all things had
come ; and rioting accompanied by a cer-
tain amount of bloodshed in Paris and
in a number of the Departments. It
has equipped the Anti-Semites, the Anti-
Protestants, and the Nationalists with
new and formidable weapons by fur-
nishing them with real grievances, and
fulfilling their gloomiest forebodings
and prophecies. It has exasperated the
devout Catholics to the last degree, and
has produced in many of the hitherto
lukewarm Catholics the very devoutness
which it deplores and aims to destroy.
It has impelled the more far-seeing Pro-
testants to make common cause with
the Catholics against the Free Thought
which would allow no freedom to reli-
gion if left unopposed. It has weak-
ened the authority of France in several
of her colonies, and complicated her di-
plomacy with European and Asiatic
countries and with the Vatican by rea-
son of her role of protector of the Cat
olic missions in the Orient, and has pi
her in an unfavorable light with Catho-
lic populations all over the world. It
has diminished the national wealth, and
will involve, unavoidably, increased tax-
ation.
But the worst result is the discredit-
ing of the Republic, as such, in the very
quarters where it is the most important
it should retain or conciliate respect.
Royalist Brittany, which was just
The Year in France.
657
ceasing to sulk, after years of pictur-
esque allegiance to its " lost cause " of
royalty, and was just beginning to feel
itself an organic part of Republican
France, has been thrown violently back
to where it was a generation ago — or
nearly that — by the fussiness, sacrile-
giousness, and ferocity of the ministerial
persecution to which it has been subject-
ed during the past three years ; and the
same is true in a greater or less degree
of other half-reconciled provinces with
royalist leanings. Alsace-Lorraine (by
whose secret loyalty to France French-
men set such store), at any rate the Cath-
olic part of it, has been given good cause
at last to congratulate itself on its forcible
separation from the mother country, since
it escapes thereby an irritating religious
oppression. The neutrals in French poli-
tics, who are indifferent as to whether
the government is republican or mo-
narchic in form, so that it governs liber-
ally and well, are being rapidly alienat-
ed from the present republican govern-
ment by reason of the cavalier fashion
in which it has latterly conducted itself.
Finally, not a few veteran Republicans
to whom the Republic represented at its
founding " the reign of virtue, of justice,
of liberty, of equality, of fraternity,"
have been sadly disillusionized by the
turn events have taken, and are beginning
to query whether a republic that, after
thirty years of existence, can only be
maintained by the destruction of the lib-
erties for which a republic is supposed
to stand, is really worth maintaining.
If the upshot of it all should be the
complete separation of church and state
in France, as some predict, the unlove-
ly mediaeval intolerance of the present
hour would almost have redeemed itself.
" Separation " alone seems capable of
putting an end to the "bloodless civil
war " (la guerre civile morale) that is
sapping the vitality and dissipating the
energy of the nation. Permanent reli-
gious and social peace can never be had
under the present hybrid system of sub-
VOL. xcm. — NO. 559. 42
sidized churches (Catholic, Protestant,
and Jewish) subject to partial state con-
trol, and the only remaining alternatives
of a State Religion and a State Irreligion
are alike abominable and despotic, and
are not to be considered.
The separation idea was given a more
than respectable vote in the Chamber,
last June, and several separation pro-
jects are now in the hands of a special
parliamentary commission. The Cath-
olic bishops are almost unanimously op-
posed to separation because they fear
that without the protection afforded by
the Concordat, the regular clergy would
be dealt with in the same high-handed
fashion as the members of the religious
orders, and because it would take from
the church its principal financial sup-
port ; and, for the latter reason, a ma-
jority of the Protestant consistories like-
wise disapprove it. A goodly number
of the Anti-clericals regard it askance
because it would deprive them, at one
and the same time, of an exquisite plea-
sure (that of bullying and disciplining
the clergy) and of their principal politi-
cal capital. The moderates are inclined
to distrust it as they do every measure
of bold initiative. Nevertheless, the
separatist movement is making rapid
headway in all the political camps.
There are signs that M. Combes, who,
though favorable to separation in prin-
ciple, has so far scrupulously avoided
taking an irrevocable position on the
question as a ministerial policy, has a
separation project up his sleeve, so to
speak, and will one of these days annex
it to his official programme. In this
case, since M. Combes succeeds (by
hook or by crook) in doing what he sets
out to do, separation will be assured.
We shall see what we shall see, but
time must be reckoned with; for, as
M. Combes himself has more than once
sagaciously pointed out, the severance of
the church from the state in a country as
old as France is too gigantic an under-
taking to be accomplished in a day.
658
The Year in France.
It should be explained in fairness
(and the writer has not the shadow of
a motive to be other than fair) that the
Anti-clericalism of the period is not en-
tirely gratuitous, not absolutely without
provocation. Unquestionably the Anti-
clerical lends too ready an ear to cal-
umnies against the church, and exagger-
ates, by giving his fancy too free a
reiu, the machinations of the clergy ;
but he is not fighting a purely imaginary
adversary, a simple man of straw. Cler-
icalism, that is to say a movement " that
trespasses, in the name of the Christian
faith, on the domain of politics, and that,
under the cover of religion, menaces
the tranquillity of the state," does exist.
It is not a myth. Monks, priests, and
prelates are to be found in every part of
France who have cast in their lot, in
spite of the sage counsels of Leo XIII,
with reactionary policies and politics.
It is quite possible that the monastic
orders, especially the commercial ones,
have been acquiring a disproportionate
part of the national fortune, — though
the figures adduced to prove it are not
very convincing, — and that their riches
have been turned systematically into the
election coffers of the Reaction. It is
quite possible, also, that unworthy priests,
who have taken shameful advantage of
their pious garb and their confidential
offices to commit gross immoralities and
even common law crimes, have escaped
punishment through their affiliations with
reactionary politicians.
It is probably true that the army
officers who received their early educa-
tion in the church schools have been ad-
vanced more rapidly than those who
received their early education elsewhere,
while the flat refusal of at least two of
them to participate in the execution of
the Congregations' Law lends color to
the current charges of collusion between
the church and the army.
It is certain that a portion of the
clergy engaged more actively in the Anti-
Dreyfus agitation than was strictly con-
sistent with their priestly obligations and
functions ; that a number of journals,
Catholic at least in name (notably La
Croix, one of the yellowest of yellow
sheets), have been aggressively Anti-
Republican, and that so many zealous
Catholics have either participated in or
condoned the excesses of Anti-Semitism,
Anti - Protestantism, and Nationalism,
that these disturbing crusades have come
to be classed as, primarily, Catholic move-
ments.
Furthermore, an ill-advised minority
of the unauthorized Congregations re-
fused to apply for the legal authoriza-
tion which, for the matter of that, the
ministry had determined in advance
should not be granted. A relatively
small proportion of the monks and nuns
resisted the application of the law of
1901 and the decrees and ordinances
issued to supplement it; others, there is
much reason to believe, evaded it by
fraudulent secularizations. A few pre-
lates, indignant at the high - handed
fashion in which this law was enforced,
manifested publicly their hostility to the
ministerial policy, and exhorted the
priests and laymen of their jurisdictions
to throw themselves into anti-ministerial
politics, — which they did in a highly
offensive manner during the campaign
preceding the last general election. The
Bishop of La Rochelle counseled a boy-
cott of the traders friendly to the min-
istry, and the Bishop of Tre'guier made
a narrow and stupid protest against the
erection of a statue to Renan in his
diocese. A few priests joined the non-
resistance movement of Edouard Dru-
mont, to the extent of urging their pa-
rishioners to refuse to pay their taxes,
and the priests of Brittany paid none
too much heed to the extraordinary order
forbidding them to teach the Catechism
in the Breton language. The secularized
monks who preached the Lenten courses
last spring, in defiance of a ministerial
prohibition, were, in many cases, more
intent on berating the ministry than on
The Year in France.
659
inculcating the observance of the Lenten
season.
Do such facts seriously threaten the
Republic ? It hardly seems so to the
unprejudiced observer, especially as most
of them can be traced directly to a nat-
ural, if unphilosophic, anger under the
stress of persecution. The Anti-clericals,
however, believe (or pretend to believe)
that they do threaten it. One more can-
did than his fellows will occasionally be
found who confesses that the conduct of
the Anti-clerical ministry has been arbi-
trary and despotic, but even he justifies
it on the ground that the very existence
of the Republic is at stake. According
to him the ministerial persecution, so-
called, is a gesture not of aggression, but
of simple defense. It is a lif e-and-death
matter, he swears, and summary pro-
cedure is absolutely necessary to save
the state. The law of self-defense over-
rides every other consideration, of course,
in public as in private matters, and to
such an asseveration no answer can be
made.
In this lofty character of defender of
the Public Safety the Anti-clerical is un-
assailable, no doubt. Still, it is difficult
to repress a smile when one counts up
the number of times within the last
thirty-five years the Republic has been
" saved " (the incorrigible back-slider !)
by different parties and coalitions of
parties, if their own word is to be taken.
It is impossible to forget that this law of
Public Safety has often been made polit-
ical capital of (by at least two highly
dissimilar ministries, for instance, during
the course of the Dreyfus Affair), that
it has been invoked again and again to
pass a pet measure, to keep a minis-
try in power, or to banish or imprison
troublesome political adversaries about
whose essential patriotism there was not
the shadow of a doubt ; and that it is in
the name of this same Public Safety, to
put the case even more strongly, that
most of the great public crimes of French
history have been committed.
The present fierce outburst of Anti-
clericalism is, in one sense, a reprisal for
an antecedent Clericalism that partici-
pated in the fanatical violence of Na-
tionalism, Anti-Semitism, and Anti-Pro-
testantism ; but this antecedent Clerical-
ism was also, in one sense, a reprisal for
a still earlier Anti - clericalism, and so
on, back to the Revolution and beyond.
No one can say with certainty which of
the two hostile forces now face to face
committed the first wrong. Nor does it
much matter. In this respect, the situa-
tion is as broad as it is long. If it is
probable that, without the Clericalism
of yesterday, France would not be suf-
fering to-day from the insolent triumph
of Anti-clericalism, it is equally prob-
able that, without the Anti - clericalism
of day before yesterday, she would not
have suffered yesterday from the ex-
treme manifestations of clerical Nation-
alism, Anti-Semitism, and Anti-Protes-
tantism.
Clericalism and Jacobinism are, alas,
perennial in France, and those who see
in the war against the Congregations a
simple corollary to the Dreyfus Affair
have read history to little purpose. The
passions roused by that affair may be
the immediate occasion of the dramatic
out-cropping of Jacobinism at this par-
ticular time. But the Dreyfus Affair
itself was only a phase of the venerable
and irrepressible conflict between in-
tolerant religion and equally intolerant
Free Thought, between Clericalism and
Jacobinism, between the dogmatically re-
actionary and the dogmatically radical
elements of the nation, each determined
to impose an artificial unity by making
society over in its own image. The phe-
nomenal virulence of the Dreyfus Af-
fair was the sum of the rancors accumu-
lated in ancestral struggles.
" We are an old nation," said M. Wal-
deck-Rousseau in his all too tardy plea
for patience and moderation ; " we have
a long history ; we are attached to the
past by the deepest roots, and even those
660
The Year in France.
roots which we have reason to suppose
dried up still retain a sensibility which
the slightest wound revives, and which
communicates itself to the entire organ-
ism." This should be constantly borne
in mind by every student of the Anti-
clerical agitation, and had M. Waldeck-
Rousseau himself not temporarily for-
gotten it, it is doubtful whether he would
have assumed the awful responsibility of
inflicting a " wound." It is only in the
light of the history of many centuries
that the renascence of Jacobinism in the
France of the twentieth century can be
even approximately comprehended, and
it is in the light of history yet to be made
that it must be finally judged.
Under almost any other circumstances
than those created by the application and
perfection of the Congregations' legisla-
tion, two such sensational, if grotesque,
events as the trial of the Humberts and
the filibustering expedition of Jacques I,
Emperor of the Sahara, would have cre-
ated no small public commotion ; thanks
to the aggressiveness of Anti-clericalism,
they passed relatively unnoticed. Thanks
to it, also (as well as to a sort of apathy
in the public Dreyfus-ward, induced by
extreme fatigue), the reopening and sec-
ond revision of the Dreyfus Affair have
caused scarcely a ripple of excitement ;
nor are they likely to if the Affair can be
kept in the courts, — where it always be-
longed, — and out of the Chamber, —
where it should never have been allowed
to enter.
Under other circumstances, likewise,
the public would have shown more
interest than it has in the expulsion
from the Socialist organization of the
Socialist leader, Millerand, because of
his impenitent opportunism ; in the in-
troduction into the Chamber of a reso-
lution in favor of disarmament ; and in
the discussions of the projects of law
for the pensioning of old age, for the
reduction of the term of military ser-
vice from three years to two years, and
for the purchase of the railways by the
state.
The Anti-clerical legislation has not
only overshadowed all other legislation,
but it has served in more than one in-
stance— wherein lies its true subtlety,
perhaps — to prevent it or delay it, to
"head it off," as we say in New Eng-
land ; and for this it is entitled to the
gratitude of some of its bitterest adversa-
ries. " It is a sure and ancient policy,"
says La Bruyere, " to let the people fall
asleep in fetes, in spectacles, in luxury,
in pomps, in pleasures, in vanity ; to let
it fill itself with emptiness and savor
bagatelles." The modern policy as prac-
ticed by M. Combes (and M. Waldeck-
Rousseau before him) toward the So-
cialists, upon whom his tenure of office
depends, is analogous to this ancient one.
It consists in keeping them so gorged
— and drowsy — with Anti-clericalism,
which is one of their casual prejudices
rather than one of their essential prin-
ciples, that they neglect to insist on the
application of these essential principles.
M. Combes has practiced this policy with
such consummate cunning that he has
succeeded not only in refusing them with
impunity the measures called for by
their doctrines, but also in forcing them
to vote more than one measure in direct
violation of their doctrines. In the ab-
sence of proof to the contrary, he should
be given credit for sincerity in his work
of reform ; but if his motives were purely
political, and he had no higher ambition
than to maintain himself in power, he
could not have adopted a surer method.
And just as long as the supply of Anti-
clerical sops holds out the method is
bound to work.
Nearly every department of the com-
munity life has been more or less influ-
enced by the general preoccupation with
the issues of Anti-clericalism, as it was a
few years ago by the general preoccupa-
tion with the issues of the Dreyfus Affair.
In the field of letters this influence has
The Year in France.
661
been especially pronounced. Jules Le-
maitre and Anatole France, both masters
of gentle irony, amiable mockery, and
polite skepticism, the two most typical
dilettanti authors of their time, perhaps,
have both abjured this distinguished dil-
ettanteism (the former in the interests
of Nationalism, the latter in the interests
of Anti-clericalism) for vulgar political
polemics and pamphleteering. Fra^ois
CoppeVs naive, unctuous participation
in Edouard Drumont's anti-tax-paying
crusade a couple of seasons back made
him the laughing-stock of France. Cop-
pde has not counted in a literary way,
has been a very literary zero without a
rim, in fact, since he has taken to ha-
ranguing the multitude in the name of
the church.
Paul Bourget, having exhausted the
psychology of the alcove, has also be-
come an apostle of the church — with
not altogether unhappy results. Maurice
Barres has found in Nationalism a new
domain for his shadowy ego to cavort in,
and in the cult of " the soil and the
dead" (la terre et les morts) the new
formula which he must have periodical-
ly, or perish. His sombre, foggy talent
could hardly, for the moment, be better
employed. Charles Maurras, who pro-
mised to become one of the virile, crea-
tive artists of his generation, has dropped
into the category of the incisive pam-
phleteers since he went over body and
soul to the Reaction. Laurent Tailhade,
who used to delight in chiseling exquisite
verses, now finds his chief delight in in-
sulting the brave souls of Brittany. Henri
Be'renger and Victor Charbonnel, both
able scholars and thinkers, and both
leaders in the movement for the estab-
lishment of Universites Populaires,
seem to have lost their heads com-
pletely. Not content with exerting them-
selves against Clericalism through the
columns of their journals, La Raison
and L' Action, they have led Anti-cler-
ical mobs in assaults upon religious pro-
cessions and in the invasion and desecra-
tion of churches during the celebration
of the mass.
The unveiling of the statue of Renan
at Trdguier, which should have been a
purely literary event, was made to serve
the politics of persecution, whereby un-
pardonable violence was done to the
memory of the sweet-tempered philoso-
pher who was nothing if not an apostle
of tolerance.
The election to the Academy of Rene*
Bazin, author of a number of strong and
pure romances of provincial life, was
generally sneered at by the Anti-clerical
press, because Bazin chances to be a
professor in a Catholic university ; and
the proposed appointment of Ferdinand
Brunetiere to the chair of literature at
the College de France, as successor of
Emile Deschanel, is being fiercely op-
posed because, forsooth, M. Brunetiere
is an apologist of the church.
The books of the year which have
caused the most talk are books not pro-
per to literature that have some bearing,
direct or indirect, on the political situa-
tion. Such are M. Combes' Campagne
Laique (Introduction by Anatole France)
and Jules Payot's Cours de Morale, an-
nounced as " a handbook of laical moral-
ity, containing a system of morals solidly
based on the general results of contem-
porary science, and indispensable to a
purely rational moral education." The
political situation has inspired a number
of calm, dignified, and scholarly works
on the relations of modern science to
morality, the most notable of which is
M. Gabriel Seailles' Les Affirmations
de la Conscience Moderne ; also several
scholarly studies of ecclesiastical history
and temperate considerations of the prob-
lems involved in the separation of church
and state.
Fiction, contrary to the general im-
pression outside of France, forms a
much smaller proportion of the publish-
ing output of France than of England
or America. In history and the philos-
ophy of history, in philosophy, in ethics,
662
The Tear in France.
in biography, in aesthetics, in archaeology,
in anthropology, in sociology and social
geography, in political economy, in phi-
lology, in criticism, and in the specialized
sciences, many works have appeared the
past year, as every year, that would de-
serve extended notice did the scope of
this article permit. In poetry and in
fiction, also, the year has been, all things
considered, an average one.
A curious tendency of the literary
year has been the widespread interest
taken in the French translations of the
works of President Roosevelt and An-
drew Carnegie, and in several other
books on America by Americans and
Frenchmen. French curiosity regard-
ing American life is almost limitless at
the present moment. America is dis-
tinctly the mode to-day, as England was
at the time when Edmond Demolins
published his Anglo-Saxon Superiority.
This admiration for the American way
of doing things, particulai-ly in indus-
try and commerce, corresponds with an
effort for the rehabilitation of France
commercially and industrially. Evi-
dently the campaign carried on these
latter years by the so-called Professors
of Energy in France has accomplished
something.
The most noteworthy feature of the
theatrical year (in the regrettable ab-
sence of any new dramatic form or tran-
scendent drama) has been a sudden and
striking acceleration of the movement
for giving French and foreign classics
and the successes of the fashionable
theatres to the dwellers in the working
districts. The announcements of an aver-
age week of the busy season in Paris
show fourteen theatres giving twenty-
four pieces that may be rated without
over-indulgence as literature. The num-
ber of working-faubourg theatres giving
high-class literary drama has increased
amazingly within a single twelvemonth ;
while various organizations have devoted
themselves assiduously to the work of
carrying dramatic art to the people.
Through the agency of the Trente Ans
de Theatre, for example, the company
of the Come'die Frangaise has given per-
formances of Racine, Moliere, etc. (ac-
companied by explanatory lectures), to
wildly enthusiastic houses in all the in-
dustrial quarters of Paris, and the annual
report of the society reveals the signifi-
cant fact that the attendance on the
classic performances of the troupe in the
home theatre has been increased thereby
instead of diminished, as it was feared
would be the case.
The opening of an Autumn Salon, Le
Salon d'Automne, was the distinguishing
event of the year 1903 in art. This
Salon, which has been long needed and
long promised, is designed to create a
second art season in the year ; in other
words, to do for the art work of the sum-
mer what the spring Salons do for that
of the winter. It is a logical and neces-
sary result of the increase of the habit
of painting pictures to their finish in the
open air, as distinguished from the old
studio method of painting. It will wel-
come for a time, probably, a good many
of the younger and more daring men
who have been prevented from exposing
in either of the spring Salons by the
extreme academicism of the one and
the close-corporation spirit of the other.
It is not, however, a salon of revolt
in the sense in which the Champ de
Mars and the Salon des Inddpendants
were salons of revolt in their origins.
Most of its charter members have been
in the habit of exhibiting, and will con-
tinue to exhibit, in the old Salons which
the new Salon is intended to supplement
rather than antagonize. The art colony
of Paris is forced to seek incessantly
fresh outlets for its enormous overpro-
duction, much as the crowded nations of
Europe are forced to seek incessantly
fresh outlets for the surplus products of
their workshops. Such an outlet the
artists of Paris find in the Autumn
Salon. Since it comes at a season when
An Hour with our Prejudices.
663
there is a distinct dearth of art events in
Paris, the public seems inclined to take
kindly to it. Its first exhibition (judged
as a first exhibition) was highly credit-
able in almost every respect.
The splendid scientific activity of
France has been more than ordinari-
ly fruitful the past year in tangible re-
sults. The awarding of the Nobel Prize
in physics to M. and Mme. Curie and
M. Becquerel (for their researches re-
garding radium) called attention to a
series of discoveries which seem destined
to revolutionize what have been consid-
ered the fundamental laws of matter up
to the present. The entire civilized world
was dazzled thereby, and in France for
a few short days every other public in-
terest, even Anti-clericalism, was thrust
into the background. Latterly, M. Curie
has proved that helium can be produced
from radium, M. d'Arsonval has re-
corded a number of interesting obser-
vations regarding radio - activity, and
M. Darier has presented to the Academy
of Medicine a suggestive if inconclusive
report upon radium as an alleviator of
pain.
M. Blondlot of Nancy has announced
to the Academy of Sciences the discov-
ery of a new species of radio-activity, to
the manifestations of which he has given
the name of N-rays (les Rayons N),
and M. Charpentier, also of Nancy,
claims to have established that these
N-rays are emitted by man and by ani-
mals.
The original work of M. Edouard
Branly in connection with wireless tele-
graphy is none the less valuable intrinsi-
cally for being eclipsed by that of Signor
Marconi upon the same subject, and this
fact has been fittingly recognized by di-
viding between him and Mme. Curie the
Osiris Prize.
In applied science the year has been
marked by a decided increase in the in-
dustrial utilization of alcohol and acety-
lene, and by sensible advances, along the
lines of the three principal theories of
aerostation, toward the solution of the
problem of aerial navigation, M. Le-
baudy in particular, with his famous
airship Le Jaune, having proven himself
a worthy rival of M. Santos-Dumont.
The brilliant achievements of the re-
markable group of bacteriologists at the
Pasteur Institute have been materially
increased, particularly by the demonstra-
tions of MM. Roux and Metchnikoff.
M. Marmorek (the discoverer — in 1893
— of a valuable anti-streptococcic se-
rum) has conducted experiments that
have revealed important new facts re-
garding the nature and action of the
germ of tuberculosis, and has succeeded
in preparing an anti-tuberculosis serum
from which he has obtained positive if
not as yet absolutely decisive results.
Alvan F. Sanborn.
AN HOUR WITH OUR PREJUDICES.
WE may compare the human mind to
a city. It has its streets, its places of
business and amusement, its citizens of
every degree. When one person is intro-
duced to another it is as if the warder
drew back the bolts, and the gates were
thrown open. If he comes well recom-
mended he is given the freedom of the
city. In the exercise of this freedom,
however, the stranger should show due
caution.
There is usually a new quarter. Here
the streets are well lighted and policed,
the crowds are cosmopolitan, and the
tourist who wanders about looking in the
shop windows is sure of a civil reply to
664
An Hour with our Prejudices.
his questions. There is no danger of
highway robbers, though of course one
may be taken in by confidence men.
But if he be of an inquiring mind and
a lover of the picturesque, he is not
satisfied with this. After all, the new
quarters are very much alike, and one
tires after a while of shop windows.
The visitor longs to explore the old town,
with its winding ways, with its over-
hanging houses, and its mild suggestions
of decay.
But in the mental city the lover of
the picturesque must remember that he
carries his life in his hands. It is not
safe to say to a casual acquaintance,
" Now I have a fair idea of that part of
your mind which is like that of any
other decently educated person. I have
seen all the spick and span show places,
and admired all the modern improve-
ments. Where are your ruins ? I should
like to poke around a while in the more
dilapidated section of your intellect."
Ah, but that is the Forbidden City.
It is inhabited, not by orderly citizens
under the rule of Right Reason, but by
a lawless crowd known as the Preju-
dices. They are of all sorts and condi-
tions. Some are-of aristocratic lineage.
They come from a long line of heredi-
tary chiefs, who, as their henchmen have
deserted them, have retreated into their
crumbling strongholds. Some are bold,
roistering blades who will not stand a
question; dangerous fellows, these, to
meet in the dark! The majority, per-
haps, are harmless folk, against whom the
worst that can be said is that they have
a knack of living without visible means
of support.
A knowledge of human nature, as dis-
tinguished from a knowledge of moral
philosophy, is a perception of the im-
portant part played by instinctive likes
and dislikes, by perverse antipathies, by
odd ends of thought, by conclusions
which have got helplessly detached from
their premises, if they ever had any.
The formal philosopher, judging others
by himself, works on the assumption
that man is naturally a reasoning an-
imal, whereas experience teaches that
the craving for the reasonable is an ac-
quired taste.
Of course we all have reasons for our
opinions, — plenty of them ! But in the
majority of cases they stand not as an-
tecedents, but as consequents. There is
a reversal of the rational order like that
involved in Dr. Bale's pleasant conceit
of the young people who adopted a
grandmother. In spite of what intel-
lectual persons say, I do not see how
we can get along without prejudices. A
prejudice is defined as " an opinion or
decision formed without due examina-
tion of the facts or arguments which are
necessary to a just and impartial deter-
mination." Now, it takes a good deal of
time to make a due examination of facts
and arguments, even in regard to a
small matter. In the meantime our
minds would be sadly unfurnished. If
we are to make a fair show in the world,
we must get our mental furniture when
we set up housekeeping, and pay for it
on the installment plan.
Instead of taking a pharisaic attitude
toward our neighbor's prejudices, it is
better to cultivate a wise tolerance,
knowing that human intercourse is de-
pendent on the art of making allowances.
This is consistent with perfect honesty.
There is always something to admire if
the critic is sufficiently discriminating.
When you are shown a bit of picturesque
dilapidation, it is quite possible to enjoy
it. Said the Hebrew sage : " I went by
the field of the slothful, and by the vine-
yard of the man void of understanding ;
and, lo, it was all grown over with
thorns, and nettles had covered the face
thereof, and the stone wall thereof was
broken down. Then I saw, and consid-
ered it well : I looked upon it, and re-
ceived instruction."
His point of view was that of a moral-
ist. Had he also been a bit of an artist
the sight of the old wall with its tangle
An Hour with our Prejudices.
665
of flowering briers would have had still
further interest.
When one's intellectually slothful
neighbor points with pride to portions
of his untilled fields, we must not be too
hard upon him. We also have patches
of our own that are more picturesque
than useful. Even if we ourselves are
diligent husbandmen, making ceaseless
war on weeds and vermin, there are
times of relenting. Have you never felt
a tenderness when the ploughshare of
criticism turned up a prejudice of your
own ? You had no heart to harm the
Wee sleekit, cow'rin', tim'rous beastie.
It could not give a good account of it-
self. It had been so long snugly en-
sconced that it blinked helplessly in the
garish light. Its
wee bit housie, too, in ruins !
Its silly wa's the win's are strewin' !
And naething now to big a new ane.
You would have been very angry if any
one had trampled upon it.
This is the peculiarity about a preju-
dice. It is very appealing to the person
who holds it. A man is seldom offended
by an attack on his reasoned judgments.
They are supported by evidence and can
shift for themselves. Not so with a
prejudice. It belongs not to the uni-
versal order ; it is his very own. All the
chivalry of his nature is enlisted in its
behalf. He is, perhaps, its only defense
against the facts of an unfriendly world.
We cannot get along without making
allowances for these idiosyncrasies of
judgment. Conversation is impossible
where each person insists on going back,
all the time, to first principles, and test-
ing everything by an absolute stan-
dard. With a person who is incapable
of changing his point of view we cannot
converse ; we can only listen and protest.
We are in the position of one who, con-
scious of the justice of his cause, attempts
to carry on a discussion over the tele-
phone with " Central." He only hears
an inhuman buzzing sound indicating
that the line is busy. There is nothing
to do but to " hang up the 'phone."
When a disputed question is intro-
duced, one may determine the true con-
versationalist by applying the method of
Solomon. Let it be proposed to divide
the subject so that each may have his
own. Your eager disputant will be satis-
fied, your genial talker is aghast at the
proposition, for he realizes that it would
kill the conversation. Instead of hold-
ing his own, he awaits developments.
He is in a mood which can be satisfied
with something less than a final judg-
ment. It is not necessary that his
friend's opinions should be just ; it is
sufficient that they are characteristic.
Whatever turn the talk may take, he pre-
serves an easy temper. He is a heresy
hunter, — not the grim kind who go hunt-
ing with a gun ; he carries only a camera.
If he stirs up a strange doctrine he does
not care to destroy it. When he gets a
snap-shot at human nature he says, —
Those things do best please me
That befall preposterously.
An English gentleman relates a con-
versation he had with Prince Bismarck.
The prince was inclined to take a pessi-
mistic view of the English people. He
thought that there was a degeneration in
the race, which he attributed to the grow-
ing habit of drinking water. " Not that
he believed that there was any particu-
lar virtue per se inherent in alcoholic
drink ; but he was sorry to hear that the
old ' three bottle men ' were dying out
and leaving no successors. He had a
suspicion that it meant shrinkage in
those qualities of the English which had
made them what they were in the past,
and for which he had always felt a sin-
cere admiration."
It would have been very easy to drift
into debate over this proposition. The
English gentleman, however, defended
his countrymen more diplomatically.
" I replied that with regard to the water-
drinking proclivities of my countrymen
there was a good deal of calumny con-
666
An Hour with our Prejudices.
nected with the story. It is true that a
certain section of English society has in-
deed taken to water as a beverage. But
to argue therefrom that the English peo-
ple have become addicted to water would
be to draw premature conclusions from
insufficient data. In this way I was
able to calm Prince Bismarck's fears in
regard to what the future might bring
forth, and our conversation reverted to
Royalty."
Each nation has its own set of precon-
ceptions. We must take them altogeth-
er, or not at all. They are as compact
and as natural a growth as the concen-
tric layers of an onion. Here is a sen-
tence from Max Mtiller's Autobiogra-
phy, thrown out quite incidentally. He
has been telling how strange it seemed,
when first coming to Oxford, to find that
the students got along without dueling.
Fighting with swords seemed to him the
normal method of developing manliness,
though he adds that in the German uni-
versities " pistol duels are generally pre-
ferred by theological students because
they cannot easily get a living if the
face is scarred all over."
This remark must be taken as one
would take a slice of the national onion.
One assumption fits into another. To
an Englishman or an American there is
an incongruity that approaches the gro-
tesque, — because our prejudices are dif-
ferent. It all becomes a matter-of-fact
statement when we make the proper as-
sumptions in regard to dueling in gen-
eral and theological duels in particular.
Assuming that it is necessary for theo-
logical students to fight duels, and that
the congregations are prejudiced against
ministers whose faces have been slashed
by swords, what is left for the poor theo-
logues but pistols ? Their method may
seem more dangerous than that adopted
by laymen, but Max Miiller explains that
the danger is chiefly to the seconds.
Individual peculiarities must be taken
into account in the same way. Prince
Bismarck, in dining with the Emperor,
inquired the name of the brand of cham-
pagne, which proved to be a cheap Ger-
man article. " The Emperor explained,
' I drink it from motives of economy, as
I have a large family ; then again I drink
it from patriotic motives.' Thereupon
I said to the Emperor, ' With me, your
Majesty, patriotism stops short in the
region of my stomach.' "
It is evident that here was a differ-
ence not to be arbitrated by reason. If
the Emperor could not understand the
gastronomic limitations to the Chancel-
lor's patriotism, neither could the Chan-
cellor enter into the Emperor's anxieties,
as he economized for the sake of his large
family.
One cannot but wonder at the temer-
ity of a person who plunges into con-
versation with a stranger without any
preliminary scouting or making sure of
a line of retreat. Ordinary prudence
would suggest that the first advances
should be only in the nature of a recon-
noissance in force. You may have very
decided prejudices of your own, but it is
not certain that they will fraternize with
those of your new acquaintance. There
is danger of falling into an ambush.
There are painful occasions when we
remember the wisdom of the Son of Si-
rach, — " Many have fallen by the edge
of the sword, but not so many as have
fallen by the tongue." The mischief of
it is that the most kindly intent will not
save us. The path of the lover of man-
kind is beset by difficulties for which he
is not prepared. There are so many
antagonisms that are unpredictable.
When Nehemiah came to rebuild the
walls of Jerusalem he remarked grimly,
" When Sanballat the Horonite, and To-
biah the servant, the Ammonite, heard of
it, it grieved them exceedingly that there
was come a man to seek the welfare
the children of Israel ; " and the trouble
was that a large number of the children
of Israel themselves seem to have
sented the interference with their habit
ual misfortunes. The experience of Ne
An Hour with our Prejudices.
667
hemiah is that of most reformers. One
would suppose that the person who aims
at the greatest good for the greatest
number would be greeted with instant
applause. The difficulty is that the
greatest good is just what the greatest
number will not tolerate. One does not
need to believe in human depravity to
recognize the prejudice which most per-
sons have against anything which is pro-
posed as good for them. The most suc-
cessful philanthropists are those who
most skillfully conceal their benevolent
intent.
In Coleman's Life of Charles Reade
there is a paragraph which gives us a
glimpse of a prejudice that has resisted
the efforts of the most learned men to
eradicate it. An incident is there re-
corded that took place when Reade was
a fellow in Magdalen College. " Just as
I was about to terminate my term of of-
fice (I hope with credit to myself and the
'Varsity) an untoward incident occurred
which embittered my relations for life
with two very distinguished men. Pro-
fessor Goldwin Smith and his friend John
Conington, who belonged to us, had at-
tempted to inaugurate a debating society.
A handful of unmannerly young cubs,
resenting the attempt to teach them po-
litical economy, ducked poor Conington
under the college pump."
" Resenting the attempt to teach them
political economy ! " — What is the
source of that resentment ? What psy-
chologist has fathomed the abyss of the
dark prejudice which the natural man
has against those who would improve
his mind ? It is a feud which reaches
back into hoar antiquity. Doubtless the
accumulated grievances of generations
of schoolboys have intensified the feud,
but no amelioration of educational meth-
ods has put an end to it. In the most
successful teacher you may detect a
nervous strain like that which the trainer
of wild beasts in the arena undergoes. His
is a perilous position, and every faculty
must be on the alert to hold the momen-
tary ascendency. A single false motion,
and the unmannerly young cubs would
be upon their victim.
Must we not confess that this irra-
tional resentment against our intellectual
benefactors survives, in spite of all disci-
pline, into mature life ? We may enlarge
the area of our teachableness, but there
are certain subjects in regard to which
we do not care to be set right. The
polite conventionality according to which
a person is supposed to know his own
business is an evidence of his sensitive-
ness. Of course the assumption is not
justified by facts. A man's own busi-
ness is just the thing he is conscious of
not knowing, and he would give any-
thing in a quiet way to find out. Yet
when a candid friend ventures to instruct
him, the old irrational resentment flashes
out. What we call tact is the ability to
find before it is too late what it is that
our friends do not desire to learn from
us. It is the art of withholding, on pro-
per occasions, information which we are
quite sure would be good for them.
The prejudice against our intellectual
superiors, which leads us to take their
well-meant endeavors in our behalf as
of the nature of personal insults, is
matched by the equally irrational repul-
sion which many superior people have
for their inferiors. Nothing can be more
illogical than the attitude of these gifted
ones who use their gifts as bludgeons
with which to belabor the rest of us.
When we read the writings of men who
have a stimulating sense of their own
genius, we are struck by their nervous
irritability whenever they mention " me-
diocrity." The greater number of the
quarrels of the authors, which the elder
Disraeli chronicled, arose from the fact
that the authors had the habit of accus-
ing one another of this vice. One would
suppose mediocrity to be the sum of all
villainies, and that the mediocre man was
continually plotting in the night watches
against the innocent man of genius ; and
yet what has the mediocre man done to
668
An Hour with our Prejudices.
deserve this detestation ? Poor fellow, he
has no malice in him ! His mediocrity
is only an afterthought. He has done
his level best ; his misfortune is that sev-
eral million of his fellow men have done
as well.
The superior man, especially if his
eminence be accidental, is likely to get
a false notion of those who stand on the
level below him. The biographer of an
English dignitary says that the subject
of his memoir was not really haughty,
but " he was apt to be prejudiced against
any one who seemed to be afraid of him."
This is a not uncommon kind of preju-
dice ; and in nine cases out of ten it is
unfounded. The great man should re-
member that most of those whose man-
ners seem unduly respectful mean nothing
personal.
As great Pompey passes through the
streets of Rome, he may be pardoned for
thinking meanly of the people. They
appear to be a subservient lot, with no
proper interests of their own, their hap-
piness dependent on his passing smile, —
and he knows how little that is worth.
He sees them at a disadvantage. Let
him leave his triumphal chariot, and, in
the guise of Third Citizen, fall into
friendly chat with First Citizen and
Second Citizen, and his prejudices will
be corrected. He will find that these
worthy men have a much more indepen-
dent and self-respecting point of view
than he had thought possible. They are
out for a holiday ; they are critics of a
spectacle, easily pleased, they will admit ;
but if no one except Pompey is to be
seen to-day, why not make the most of
him ? Pompey or Caesar, it matters not ;
"the play 's the thing."
The origin of some of our prejudices
must be sought in the childhood of the
race. There are certain opinions which
have come down from the cave dwellers
without revision. They probably at one
time had reasons to justify them, though
we have no idea what they were. There
are others, which seem equally ancient,
which originated in the forgotten experi-
ences of our own childhood. The pre-
historic age of myth and fable does not
lie far behind any one of us. It is as if
Gulliver had been educated in Lilliput,
and, while he had grown in stature, had
never quite emancipated himself from
the Lilliputian point of view. The great
hulking fellow is always awkwardly try-
ing to look up at things which he has ac-
tually outgrown. He tries to make him-
self believe that his early world was as
big as it seemed. Sometimes he suc-
ceeds in his endeavors, and the result is
a curious inversion of values.
Mr. Morley, in speaking of Lord Palm-
erston's foreign policy, says : " The Sul-
tan's ability to speak French was one of
the odd reasons why Lord Palmerston
was sanguine of Turkish civilization."
This association of ideas in the mind of
the Prune Minister does seem odd till we
remember that before Lord Palmerston
was in the cabinet he was in the nursery.
The fugitive impressions of early child-
hood reappear in many curious shapes.
Who would be so hard-hearted as to exor-
cise these guiltless ghosts.
. Sometimes, in reopening an old book
over which long ago we had dreamed, we
come upon the innocent source of some of
our long-cherished opinions. Such dis-
covery I made in the old Family Bible
when opening at the pages inserted by
the publisher between the Old Testament
and the Apocrypha. On many a Sunday
afternoon my stated hour of Bible read-
ing was diversified by excursions into
these uncanonical pages. There was a
sense of stolen pleasure in the heap of
miscellaneous secularities. It was like
finding under the church roof a garret in
which one might rummage at will. Here
were tables of weights and measures, ex-
planations about shekels, suggestions in
regard to the probable length of a cubit,
curious calculations as to the number of
times the word " and " occurred in the
Bible. Here, also, was a mysterious
An Hour with our Prejudices.
669
" Table of Offices and Conditions of
Men."
I am sure that my scheme of admi-
rations, my conception of the different
varieties of human grandeur, has been
colored by that Table of Offices and
Conditions of Men. It was my Social
Register and Burke's Peerage and
Who 's Who ? all in one. It was a for-
midable list, beginning with the patri-
archs, and ending with the deacons. The
dignity of the deacon I already knew, for
my uncle was one, but his function was
vastly exalted when I thought of him in
connection with the mysterious person-
ages who went before. There was the
" Tirshatha, a governor appointed by the
kings of Assyria," — evidently a very
great man. Then there were the " Neth-
inims, whose duty it was to draw water
and to cleave wood." When I was called
upon to perform similar services I ven-
tured to think that I myself, had I lived
in better days, might have been recog-
nized as a sort of Nethinim.
Here, also, I learned the exact age of
the world, not announced arbitrarily, but
with the several items all set down, so
that I might have verified them for my-
self, had I been mathematically gifted.
" The whole sum and number of years
from the beginning of the world unto the
present year of our Lord 1815 is 5789
years, six months, and the said odd ten
days." I have no prejudice in favor of
retaining that chronology as far as the
thousands are concerned. Five thousand
years is one way of saying it was a
very long time. If the geologists prefer
to convey the same idea by calling it
millions, I am content ; but I should
hate to give up the " odd ten days."
From the same Table of Offices and
Conditions I imbibed my earliest philo-
sophical prejudices ; for there I learned
the difference between the Stoics and
Epicureans.
The Stoics were described succinct-
ly as a those who denied the liberty of
the will." Just what this might mean
was not clear, but it had an ugly sound.
The Stoics were evidently contentious
persons. On the other hand, all that was
revealed concerning the Epicureans was
that they " placed all happiness in plea-
sure." This seemed an eminently sensi-
ble idea. I could not but be favorably
disposed toward people who managed to
get happiness out of their pleasures.
To the excessive brevity of these defi-
nitions I doubtless owe an erroneous im-
pression concerning that ancient, and
now almost extinct, people, the Samar-
itans. The name has had to me a sug-
gestion of a sinister kind of scholarship ;
as if the Samaritans had been connect-
ed with some of the black arts. Yet I
know nothing in their history to justify
this impression. The source of the error
was revealed when I turned again to
the Table of Offices and Conditions of
Men and read once more, " Samaritans,
mongrel professors, half heathen and
half Jew." How was I to know that the
reference was to professors of religion,
and not to professors of the arts and
sciences ?
As there are prejudices which begin
in verbal misunderstandings, so there are
those which are nourished by the acci-
dental collocation of words. A noun is
known by the adjectives it keeps. When
we hear of dull conservatism, rabid
radicalism, selfish culture, timid piety,
smug respectability, we receive unfavor-
able impressions. We do not always
stop to consider that all that is objec-
tionable really inheres in the qualifying
words. In a well-regulated mind, after
every such verbal turn there should be a
call to change partners. Let every noun
take a new adjective, and every verb a
new adverb.
Clever Bohemians, having heard so
much of smug respectability, take a dis-
like to respectability. But some of the
smuggest persons are not respectable at
all, — far from it ! Serenely satisfied
with their own irresponsibility, they look
670
An Hour with our Prejudices.
patronizingly upon the struggling world
that owes them a living. I remember
a visit from one of these gentry. He
called to indicate his willingness to grat-
ify my charitable impulses by accepting
from me a small loan. If I did not be-
lieve the story of his frequent incarcera-
tions I might consult the chaplain of the
House of Correction. He evidently con-
sidered that he had a mission. He went
about offering his hard and impenitent
heart as a stone on which the philanthro-
pists might whet their zeal. Smug re-
spectability, forsooth !
From force of habit we speak of the
" earnest " reformer, and we are apt to
be intolerant of his lighter moods. Wil-
berforce encountered this prejudice when
he enlivened one of his speeches with a
little mirth. His opponent seized the op-
portunity to speak scornfully of the hon-
orable gentleman's " religious facetious-
ness." Wilberforce replied very justly
that " a religious man might sometimes
be facetious, seeing that the irreligious
did not always escape being dull."
An instance of the growth of a verbal
prejudice is that which in certain circles
resulted in the preaching against what
was called " mere morality." What the
preachers had in mind was true enough.
They objected to mere morality, as one
might say, " Mere life is not enough to
satisfy us, we must have something to
live on." They would have more than a
bare morality. It should be clothed with
befitting spiritual raiment. But the par-
son's zeal tended to outrun his discretion,
and forgetting that the true object of his
attack was the mereness and not the
morality, he gave the impression that the
Moral Man was the great enemy of the
faith. At last the parishioner would
turn upon his accuser. " You need not
point the finger of scorn at me. What if
I have done my duty to the best of my
ability ! You should not twit on facts.
If it comes to that, you are not in a posi-
tion to throw stones. If I am a moral
man, you 're another."
There are prejudices which are the
result of excessive fluency of speech.
The flood of words sweeps away all the
natural distinctions of thought. All
things are conceived of under two cate-
gories, — the Good and the Bad. If one
ill is admitted, it is assumed that all the
rest follow in its train. There are per-
sons who cannot mention "the poor"
without adding, "the weak, the wretched,
the oppressed, the downtrodden, the suf-
fering, the sick, the sinful, the erring,"
and so on to the end of the catalogue.
This is very disconcerting to a young
fellow who, while in the best of health
and spirits, is conscious that he is rather
poor. He would willingly admit his
poverty were it not for the fear of being
smothered under the wet blanket of uni-
versal commiseration.
When the category of the Good is
adopted with the same undiscriminating
ardor the results are equally unfortunate.
We are prejudiced against certain per-
sons whom we have never met. We have
heard nothing but good of them ; and
we have heard altogether too much of
that. Their characters have been painted
in glowing virtues that swear at one an-
other. We are sure that we should not
like such a combination of unmitigated
excellencies ; for human nature abhors
a paragon. And yet the too highly com-
mended person may, in reality, not be a
paragon at all, but a very decent fellow.
He would quickly rise in our regard were
it not for the eulogies which hang like a
millstone around his neck.
It is no easy thing to praise another
in such a way as to leave a good impres-
sion on the mind of the hearer. A vir-
tue is not for all times. When a writer
is too highly commended for being labo-
rious and conscientious we are not in-
clined to buy his book. His conscience
doth make cowards of us all. It may
be proper to recommend a candidate for
a vacant pulpit as indefatigable in his
pastoral labors ; but were you to add, in
the goodness of your heart, that he was
An Hour with our Prejudices.
671
equally indefatigable as a preacher, he
would say, " An enemy hath done this."
For the congregation would suspect that
his freedom from fatigue in the pulpit
was likely to be gained at their expense.
The prejudices which arise from ver-
bal association are potent in preventing
any impartial judgment of men whose
names have become household words.
The man whose name has become the
designation of a party or a theory is the
helpless victim of his own reputation.
Who takes th°i trouble to pry into the
personal opinions of John Calvin ? Of
course they were Calvinistic. When we
hear of the Malthusian doctrine about
population, we picture its author as a
cold - blooded, economical Herod, who
would gladly have ordered a massacre
of the innocents. Let no one tell us that
the Reverend Richard Malthus was an
amiable clergyman, who was greatly be-
loved by the small parish to which he
ministered. In spite of all his church
wardens might say, we would not trust
our children in the hands of a man who
had suggested that there might be too
many people in the world. But in such
cases we should remember that a man's
theories do not always throw light upon
his character. When a distinguished
physician has a disease named after
him, it is understood that the disease
is the one he discovered, and not the one
he died of.
When the Darwinian hypothesis star-
tled the world, many pious imaginations
conceived definite pictures of the author
of it. These pictures had but one thing
in common, — their striking unlikeness to
the quiet gentleman who had made all
this stir. By the way, Darwin was the
innocent victim of two totally discon-
nected lines of prejudice. After he had
outlived the disfavor of the theologians,
he incurred the contempt of the apostles
of culture ; all because of his modest
confession that he did not enjoy poetry
as much as he once did. Unfortunately,
his scientific habit of mind led him to
say that he suspected that he might be
suffering from atrophy of the imagina-
tive faculty. Instantly every literal-
minded reader and reviewer exclaimed,
" How dreadful ! What a judgment on
him ! " Yet, when we stop to think
about it, the affliction is not so uncom-
mon as to call for astonishment. Many
persons suffer from it who are not ad-
dicted to science.
After all, these are harmless preju-
dices. They are content with their own
little spheres, they ask only to live and
let live. There are others, however, that
are militantly imperialistic. They are
ambitious to become world powers. Such
are those which grow out of differences
in politics, in religion, and in race.
Political animosities have doubtless
been mitigated by freer social inter-
course, which gives more opportunities
for meeting on neutral ground. It is
only during a heated campaign that we
think of all of the opposing party as ras-
cals. There is time between elections
to make the necessary exceptions. It is
customary to make allowance for a cer-
tain amount of partisan bias, just as the
college faculty allows a student a certain
number of " cuts." It is a just recog-
nition of human weakness. Our British
cousins go farther, and provide means
for the harmless gratification of natural
prejudices. There are certain questions
on which persons are expected to ex-
press themselves with considerable fer-
vor, and without troubling themselves as
to the reasonableness of their contention.
In a volume of published letters I was
pleased to read one from a member of
the aristocracy. He had been indulging
in trivial personalities, when suddenly
he broke off with : " Now I must go to
work on the Wife's Sister's Question ; I
intend to make a good stout protest
against that rascally bill ! " There is no
such exercise for the moral nature as a
good stout protest. We Americans take
our exercise spasmodically. Instead of
672
An Hour with our Prejudices.
going about it regularly, we wait for some
extraordinary occasion. We make it a
point of sportsmanship to shoot our griev-
ance on the wing, and we are nervously
anxious lest it get out of range before
we have time to take aim.
Not so the protesting Briton. He ap-
proves of the answer of Jonah when he
was asked, " Doest thou well to be angry
for the gourd ? " Jonah, without any
waste of words, replied, "I do well to
be angry." When the Englishman feels
that it is well for him to be angry, he finds
constitutional means provided. Parlia-
ment furnishes a number of permanent
objects for his disapproval. Whenever
he feels disposed he can make a good
stout protest, feeling assured that his in-
dignation is well bestowed. He has such
satisfaction as that which came to Mr.
Micawber in reading his protest against
the villainies of Uriah Heep: "Much
affected but still intensely enjoying him-
self, Mr. Micawber folded up the letter
and handed it with a bow to my aunt, as
something she might like to keep."
These stout - hearted people have
learned not only how to take their plea-
sures sadly, but, what is more to the pur-
pose, how to take their sadnesses plea-
santly. We Americans have, here, some-
thing to learn. We should get along
better if we had a number of argument-
proof questions like that in regard to
marriage with the deceased wife's sister
which could be warranted to recur at
regular intervals. They could be set
apart as a sort of public playground for
the prejudices. It would at least keep
the prejudices out of mischief.
Religious prejudice has an air of sin-
gularity. The singular thing is that
there should be such a variety. If we
identify religion with the wisdom that is
from above, and which is " first pure,
then peaceable, easy to be entreated, with-
out partiality," it is hard to see where
the prejudice comes in. Religious preju-
dice is a compound of religion and sev-
eral decidedly earthly passions. The
combination produces a peculiarly dan-
gerous explosive. The religious element
has the same part in it that the innocent
glycerine has in nitro-glycerine. This
latter, we are told, is " a compound pro-
duced by the action of a mixture of
strong nitric and sulphuric acids on gly-
cerin at low temperatures." It is ob-
servable that in the making of religious
prejudice the religion is kept at a very
low temperature, indeed.
We are at present in an era of good
feeling. Not only is there an inter-
change of kindly offices between mem-
bers of different churches, but one may
detect a tendency to extend the same
tolerance to the opposing party in the
same church. This is a real advance,
for it is always more difficult to do jus-
tice to those who differ from us slightly
than to those whose divergence is funda-
mental. To love our friends is a work
of nature, to love our enemies is a work
of grace ; the troublesome thing is to get
on with those who are " betwixt and be-
tween." In such a case we are likely to
fall between nature and grace as between
two stools. Almost any one can be mag-
nanimous in great affairs, but to be
magnanimous in trifles is like trying to
use a large screw-driver to turn a small
screw.
In a recently published correspondence
between dignitaries of the Church of
England I find many encouraging symp-
toms. The writers exhibit a desire to
do justice not only to the moral, but also
to the intellectual, gifts of those who
differ from them even slightly. There
is, of course, enough of the old Adam
remaining to make their judgments on
one another interesting reading. It is
pleasant to see brethren dwelling together
in unity, — a pleasure seldom prolonged
to the point of satiety. Thus the Dean
of Norwich writes to the Dean of Dur-
ham in regard to Dean Stanley. Allud-
ing to an opinion, in a previous letter, in
regard to Archbishop Tait, the writer
says : " I confess I should n't have ranked
An Hour with our Prejudices.
673
him among the great men of the day. Of
our contemporaries I should have as-
signed that rank, without hesitation, to
little Stan, though I quite think he did
more mischief in our church and to reli-
gion than most men have it in them to
do. Still I should say that little Stan
was a great man in his way." There
you may see a mind that has, with con-
siderable difficulty, uprooted a prejudice,
though you may still perceive the place
where the prejudice used to be.
While the methods of the exact sci-
ences have had a discouraging effect on
partisan and sectarian prejudices, they
seem, for the moment, to have given new
strength to those which are the result
of differences in race. Time was when
Anti-Semitism derived its power from
religious rancor. The cradle hymn
which the Puritan mother sang began
sweetly, —
Hush, my dear, lie still and slumber !
Holy angels guard thy bed !
But after a while the mother thinks of
the wickedness of the Jews : —
Yet to read the shameful story
How the Jews abused their King,
How they served the Lord of Glory,
Makes me angry while I sing.
In these days, the Anti-Semites are
not so likely to be angry while they sing,
as while they cast up their accounts.
The natural sciences discriminate be-
tween classes rather than between indi-
viduals. Sociology deals with groups,
and not with persons. Anthropology
acquaints us with the aboriginal and un-
moralized man. It emphasizes the soli-
darity of the clan and the persistence
of the cult. Experimental psychology is
at present interested in the sub-conscious
and instinctive life. For its purpose it
treats a man as a series of nervous reac-
tions. Human history is being rewritten
as a branch of Natural History. Elim-
inating the part played by personal will,
it exhibits an age-long warfare between
nations and races.
VOL. XGIII. — NO. 559. 43
This is all very well so long as we re-
member what it is that we are studying.
Races, cults, and social groups exist and
have their history. There is no harm in
defining the salient characteristics of a
race, and saying that, on the whole, one
race is inferior to another. The diffi-
culty comes when this rough average is
made the dead line beyond which an in-
dividual is not allowed to pass.
In our Comedy of Errors, which is
always slipping into tragedy, there are
two Dromios on the stage, — the Race
and the Individual. The Race is an ab-
straction which can bear any amount of
punishment without flinching. You may
say anything you please about it and not
go far wrong. It is like criticising a
composite photograph. There is nothing
personal about it. Who is offended at
the caricatures of Brother Jonathan or
of John Bull? We recognize certain
persistent national traits, but we also
recognize the element of good-humored
exaggeration. The Jew, the Slav, the
Celt, the Anglo-Saxon, have existed for
ages. Each has admired himself, and
been correspondingly disliked by others.
Even the Negro as a racial abstraction
is not sensitive. You may, if you will,
take up the text, so much quoted a gen-
eration ago, " Cursed be Canaan ; a ser-
vant of servants shall he be. . . . God
shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell
in the tents of Shem ; and Canaan shall
be his servant." Dromio Africanus lis-
tens unmoved to the exegesis of Petro-
leum V. Nasby and his compeers at the
Crossroads : " God cust Canaan, and sed
he shood be a servant forever. Did he
mean us to pay him wages ? Not eny :
for ef he bed he wood hev ordered our
tastes and habits so es we shood hev hed
the wherewithal to do it."
The impassive Genius of Africa an-
swers the Anglo-Saxon : " If it pleases
you to think that your prejudice against
me came out of the Ark, so be it. If
you find it agreeable to identify your-
self with Japheth who shall providen-
674
Dust to Dust.
tially be enlarged, I may as well be Ca-
naan."
So long as the doctrinaires of the
Crossroads are dealing only with highly
generalized conceptions no harm is done.
But now another Dromio appears. He
is not a race ; he is a person. He has
never come that way before, and he is
bewildered by what he sees and hears.
Immediately he is beset by those who
accuse him of crimes which some one
who looks like him has committed. He
is beaten because he does not know his
place ; how can he know it, stumbling
as he does upon a situation for which he
is altogether unprepared ? It is an awk-
ward predicament, this of being born into
the world as a living soul. Under the
most favorable conditions it is hard for
the new arrival to find himself, and ad-
just himself to his environment. But
this victim of mistaken identity finds
that he has been judged and condemned
already. When he innocently tries to
make the most of himself a great uproar
is created. What right has he to inter-
fere with the preconceived opinions of
his betters ? They understand him, for
have they not known him for many
generations ?
Poor man Dromio ! Whether he have
a black skin or a yellow, and whatever
be the racial type which his features
suggest, the trouble is the same. He is
sacrificed on the altar of our stupidity.
He suffers because of our mental color-
blindness, which prevents our distinguish-
ing persons. We see only groups, and
pride ourselves on our defective vision.
By and by we may learn to be a little
ashamed of our crudely ambitious gen-
eralizations. A finer gift is the ability
to know a man when we see him. It
may be that Nature is " careful of the
type," and " careless of the single life."
If that be so, it may be the part of
wisdom for us to give up our anxieties
about the type, knowing that Nature
will take care of that. Such relief from
cosmic responsibility will give us much
more time for our proper work, which
is to deal justly with each single life.
Samuel Me Chord Crothers.
DUST TO DUST.
How dark, how rich and full the summer nights,
What warmth about them brooded, while the sea
Murmured low song, and passion throbbed to peace !
The soft airs curled around them, the great boughs
Swayed slowly with long rhythms of delight,
And sleep was but unconsciousness of joy.
Like fragile bubbles soaring sky o'er sky
How buoyantly the mornings rose and broke,
As if the world were made afresh each dawn, —
The forest folded in a fleece of mist,
The dim green wood a shimmer of the dew!
The winds were up and singing, far away
The foam-wreaths caught the sun and skimmed to shore
A shoal of sea-nymphs. Then, a rose of dreams
Her velvet cheek, he crushed her in strong arms,
Sprang for his spear and took him to the chase.
Dust to Dust. 675
One eve no hounds made music in the wood,
No hurrying echoes followed on a horn,
No mighty hunter loomed upon the hill.
" Theseus ! Where art thou, Theseus ! Love, my love ! "
She cried. And all the cliffs of Naxos mocked.
Bitter and salt as the salt bitter sea
Her tears, where prone she lay, all soul and sense
Drowned deep in seas of bottomless despair.
Then, sphered in light, at last the great god came, —
The god who gives the sweet o' the year to earth,
Who guards the world-wide curve of lovely lines,
Ripens the white wheat, pulps the purple grape,
God of the sacramental bread and wine.
The leopard-skin upon his shoulders hung,
The ivy twined his yellow locks, and like
The sunshine splintering on a spear his eye,
And like the sunshine on the heart of a flower
His smile. As beautiful as dawn he stood,
And called with strange compelling melody
This woman cast aside of dust that dies.
And lingeringly, like one in dream, she came
And found his arms a fastness. Lifted then
She lay within the heaven of his heart,
Suffused with all the godship of his love.
The winds less free throughout the courts of space,
Far from the doors of death he went with her,
Filled her with essence of immortal life,
And crowned her with a crown of seven great stars.
Yet in the tenderest moment of his care,
Though fragrant fire ran through her with his touch,
Earth in her trembled to the pulse of earth.
Old thoughts, old memories stirred the soul that bore
The pearl's dim flaw, the clay in the opal's grain.
And as black lightnings rive some growing thing
She shuddered back among her clods once more,
Sighing through silent hollows of her heart,
" Theseus ! Where art thou, Theseus ! Love, my love ! "
Harriet Prescott Spofford.
676
The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley.
THE DIPLOMATIC CONTEST FOR THE MISSISSIPPI VALLEY.
THE importance of the Louisiana Pur-
chase in the history of the United States
has become increasingly clear in the cen-
tury that has just elapsed, and as the
nation goes on to fulfill its destiny on
the Pacific and in South America it will
turn to this event with growing appre-
ciation of the significance of the march
across the Mississippi, and the acquisi-
tion of the strategic point where the
great river enters the Gulf of Mexico.
If the Declaration of Independence
marks our separation from the colonial
system of the Old World, the Louisiana
Purchase was the turning-point in the
events that fixed our position as the
arbiter of the New World.
It is the purpose of these papers to
show that this important event was no
sudden or unrelated episode in our his-
tory. It was the dramatic culmination
of a long struggle that began with the
rivalry of Spain, France, and England
for the Mississippi Valley in the colo-
nial era, continued during the American
Revolution, and brought grave problems
before the first three Presidents of the
United States in the period when Europe
was engaged in the contests of the French
Revolution.
Although the revisions of the map of
Europe, in that era, largely occupied the
European diplomats, their archives re-
veal the fact that the future of the Mis-
sissippi Valley received serious attention,
and constituted an important element in
their policy. When we consider the
power which the interior of the United
States now exerts over the economic and
political welfare of the world, we realize
that the diplomatic intrigues for the pos-
session of the Mississippi, the Ohio, and
the Great Lakes were of higher signifi-
cance in world history than many of the
European incidents which have received
more attention.
Not simply Louisiana was at stake :
the whole Mississippi Valley, — the land
between the Alleghanies and the Missis-
sippi, as well as the territory across the
river, — with the Gulf of Mexico at one
end and the Great Lakes at the other,
was the prize of the diplomatic game.
Indeed, all South America became in-
volved in the designs of the European
rivals. For the United States the mat-
ter was a vital one. The acquisition of
these regions laid the physical foundation
for our national greatness, furnished the
base from which to extend our power
to the Pacific Ocean, and gave us a domi-
nating strategic position in reference to
Spanish America. More immediately it
put an end to the plans to which France
and England had given their attention
for forming an interior dependency in
the Mississippi Valley, whose sea power
should control the Gulf of Mexico, and,
by consequence, preside over the division
of the decaying empire of Spain in the
New World. The Monroe Doctrine
would have been impossible if the de-
signs of either France, Spain, or Eng-
land, during the decade that followed
Washington's inauguration, could have
been carried out.
At the close of the war for indepen-
dence the United States held hardly more
than the Atlantic coast. Beyond the
Alleghanies an advance column of pio-
neers had pushed a wedge of sparse
settlement along the southern tributaries
of the Ohio into Kentucky and Tennes-
see. Ambitious to conquer though they
were, their hold was a precarious one.
On their right flank lay the basin of the
Great Lakes, occupied by warlike In-
dians held under control by the posts of
England at Detroit and at other strate-
gic points on the lakes. In spite of the
The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley. 677
treaty of 1783, Great Britain retained
these posts, the centres of Indian trade
and influence, alleging the failure of the
United States to carry out certain pro-
visions of the treaty, and expecting that
a speedy dissolution of the feeble con-
federation would leave to her the control
of the Great Lakes and the upper Mis-
sissippi ; nor did she forget her former
possessions on the Gulf of Mexico.
On the left flank, controlling the basin
of the Gulf of Mexico, were the four
powerful tribes of the Southern Indians.
Spain held the mouth of the Mississippi
at New Orleans, and from Mobile, St.
Marks and Pensacola furnished these
tribes with goods, arms, and ammuni-
tion. In the spring of 1784 the gov-
ernor of Louisiana, acting on the theory
that the savages were independent na-
tions, made treaties which bound them
to accept Spanish protection, and, in
return, promised to secure them in the
possession of their lands. Nor did Spain
stop with insuring her predominance
among the Indians. She avoided a
treaty with the United States at the
close of the Revolution. Refusing to
be bound by England's cession to the
United States, she set up the claim that
her victories over Great Britain in the
Revolution had given her the right to
Florida with the most extensive boun-
dary which England had given to West
Florida during her occupation. She also
contended that the eastern bank of the
Mississippi was hers, finding justification
for this in the fact that England, by the
Proclamation of 1763, had made crown
lands of the colonial territory beyond
the Alleghanies, and had forbidden the
colonists to settle there. Thus, she ar-
gued, her victories over England on the
Mississippi and in Florida gave her a
sphere of influence in the lands between
the Gulf, the Mississippi, and the Alle-
ghanies, at least as far north as the
mouth of the Ohio. She further as-
serted, as the fundamental element in
her policy, the exclusive .control of the
navigation of the Mississippi, which Eng-
land had promised us by the treaty.
All the " Western World," as the set-
tlers loved to call the land beyond the
mountains, depended on the Mississippi
for an outlet for the crops. The dwell-
ers on the Ohio, the Tennessee, the
Cumberland, and all the western waters,
shut off by the Alleghanies from the
coast, could only find a market for
their crops through New Orleans. Ob-
viously the very strength of Spain's po-
sition also constituted a menace to her-
self, in view of the feeble garrisons by
which she blocked the river. To meet
this situation, in 1786 she entered into
negotiations for a treaty by which we
should forgo our claim to the naviga-
tion of the Mississippi for twenty-five
years in return for concessions to our
commerce in her European possessions.
This proposal met the approval not only
of some of the most important statesmen
from the northeastern commercial sec-
tions, like Jay and King, but also of
Washington, who believed that the West
stood upon a pivot, — " the touch of a
feather would turn it any way." Fear-
ing that the ease of navigating the Mis-
sissippi would menace the connection of
the West with the Union, Washington
desired first to bind the West to the
East by ties of interest, opening commu-
nication by canals and roads. But many
Southern men, particularly Monroe and
Patrick Henry, saw in the proposal to
relinquish the navigation of the Missis-
sippi the sacrifice of the agricultural in-
terests to those of the maritime section,
and foretold a dissolution of the Union.
In the outcome, sufficient votes could not
be obtained to carry the treaty ; but the
West was deeply stirred by the attempt.
Another device of Spain to check the
American advance was the use of the
Southern Indians. Carondelet, the gov-
ernor of Louisiana, afterwards expressed
the Spanish policy when he declared
that there was no American force which
could protect the two hundred leagues
678 The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley.
and more of frontier from the devasta-
tions of fifteen thousand well-armed sav-
ages, nor any which would venture to de-
scend the Mississippi, leaving their com-
munications to be cut off by a swarm of
savages. " Not only will Spain always
make the American settlements tremble
by threatening them with the Indians,
but she has no other means of molesting
them." Well might Spain base her hopes
on the unsubstantial protection afforded
by her Indian allies, for, at the time, she
had but a single regiment, distributed in
twenty-one detachments, to guard nearly
two thousand miles of river front.
Under these circumstances, the Span
ish authorities also tried to detach the
West from the Union by promising free
navigation in return for the acceptance
of Spanish sovereignty by Kentucky
and the Tennessee and Cumberland set-
tlements. In the disturbed conditions
of the period, this, for a time, seemed a
possible solution of the difficulty, for
the Westerners were deeply impressed
by the effectiveness of the mountain
barrier in dividing them from the states
of the coast, and they had slight respect
for the type of social life on the sea-
board, or for the feeble government,
which, at the close of the Confederation,
afforded them protection against neither
the Indians nor the Spaniards. The
Westerners as a whole preferred the
Union ; but its value to them depended
on the efficiency with which it dealt with
the problem of the Indians and the navi-
gation of the Mississippi, and they were
determined to secure local self-govern-
ment independent of the coastwise states
whose chartered limits overspread their
territory, and whose governments dis-
posed of their land, although they were
impotent to defend the settlers. When
the old Confederation was going to
pieces in 1788-89, the Kentucky and
Tennessee settlements were engaged in
a struggle for separate statehood, and
the more radical and best known lead-
ers of these communities at the same
time entered into correspondence with
the governor of Louisiana with a view to
securing Spanish concessions in the event
of declaring independence. Inasmuch as
the thirteen states were considering the
question of ratification of the Constitu-
tion as sovereign bodies, the western
settlements, not unnaturally, were dis-
posed to decide their own allegiance at
the same time. Men like Wilkinson, of
Kentucky, later the commander in chief
of the American army, and the promi-
nent Judge Sebastian went so far as to
accept pensions from Spain as the price
of supporting her designs. General
George Rogers Clark, the most famous
military figure in the West since his
conquest of the Illinois country, offered
to become a Spanish subject, and to
transfer from the weak authority of the
United States a numerous colony if he
could receive a land grant west of the
Mississippi. Sevier and Robertson, the
founders of Tennessee, also corresponded
with the Spanish authorities, with simi-
lar ideas of saving themselves and their
communities in the midst of the general
confusion. But some of the more con-
servative and far-sighted Kentucky lead-
ers imposed a successful opposition to
precipitate action, and demanded that
further time be given to the United
States to secure from Spain the western
demands. The Spanish inti'igue for se-
ducing the West from the Union met
defeat (although Spain did not realize
the fact for some years) when the new
Constitution was ratified and a stronger
national government was established.
Another device of Spain was to attract
western settlers into her own territo-
ry by offering vast land grants to the
American frontiersmen. But Spain her-
self finally became alarmed at the idea
of taking such warlike colonies into her
bosom, and these measures were super-
seded by a regulation which gave tem-
porary relief to the settlers by opening
the river to their trade under a fifteen
per cent duty. Nevertheless, this mea-
The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley. 679
sure was permissive only, and Spain con-
tinued to control the navigation.
While Spain intrigued to dominate
both banks of the Mississippi, Great
Britain sought to attach the frontiersmen
to her interests. Decided apprehension
was felt by Madison and other congress-
men that the refusal to open the river
would throw the West into the arms of
England. Nor were these fears ground-
less, for in the fall of 1788 Dr. Connolly,
an agent of the Canadian government,
came to Kentucky, at the time when its
relation to the United States was doubt-
ful, in order to sound the disaffected as
to an English connection. Lord Dor-
chester, the governor of Canada, re-
ported to his government that private
councils in Kentucky favored declaring
independence, seizing New Orleans, and
looking to England for such assistance as
might enable them to accomplish these
designs. He sent to the British author-
ities a memorial by a gentleman of Ken-
tucky (there is reason for believing that
Wilkinson wrote it) which declared that
"the Atlantic states of America must
sink as the western settlements rise.
Nature has interposed obstacles and es-
tablished barriers between these regions
which forbid their connection on prin-
ciples of reciprocal interests, and the
flimsy texture of republican government
is insufficient to hold in the same polit-
ical bonds a people detached and scat-
tered over such an expanse of territory,
whose views and interests are discordant.
Those local causes, irresistible in their
nature, must produce a secession of the
western settlements from the Atlantic
states, and the period is not very distant.
But these people must for ages continue
agriculture ; by consequence, foreign pro-
tection will be expedient for their hap-
piness, and this protection must neces-
sarily comprehend the right of navigat-
ing the Mississippi with a marine to
protect its commerce. That power which
commands the navigation of the Missis-
sippi as completely commands the whole
country traversed by its waters as the
key does the lock or the citadel the out-
works. The politics of the western coun-
try are fast verging to a crisis, and must
speedily eventuate in an appeal to the
patronage of Spain or Britain."
In the fall of 1789 the English gov-
ernment instructed Dorchester that it
was desirable that the western settle-
ments should be kept distinct from the
United States, with a British connection.
This policy was more fully explicated in
the report of the Lords of Trade that it
would be for England's interest " to pre-
vent Vermont and Kentucke, and all
other settlements now forming in the
Interior parts of the great Continent of
North America, from becoming depen-
dent on the Government of the United
States, or of any other Foreign Country,
and to preserve them on the contrary in
a State of Independence and to induce
them to form Treaties of Commerce and
Friendship with Great Britain."
It is clear, therefore, that while Eng-
land supported the Indians in their re-
fusal to permit American settlements
north of the Ohio, she also endeavored
to control the settlements on the south
of that river. In short, Spain and Eng-
land were playing analogous parts, on
our unstable frontier, in this period of
disintegration, although England was the
more cautious, and not so unscrupulous in
her intrigue.
France also, which had viewed the loss
of Canada and Louisiana with keen re-
gret ever since the last French and In-
dian war, and had kept in view the pos-
sibility of regaining the West during the
American Revolution, was awake to the
opportunity. De Moustier, the French
Minister to the United States, sent to his
government memorials pointing out the
advantages of Louisiana and its impor-
tance to France, and before the close of
his career, in 1787, Vergennes, Prime
Minister of France, is said to have made
offers to Spain for the purchase of Louis-
iana, but was deterred by a lack of funds.
680 The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley.
Thus Washington began his adminis-
tration with a critical situation on our
frontiers. On either flank were power-
ful Indian confederacies, controlled re-
spectively by England and Spain, threat-
ening our advance. At the same time
the new and experimental government
was unable to obtain for the inhabitants
of the Mississippi Valley the navigation
of their great river, and it continually
opposed their attempts to make war upon
the Indians. In the state of unstable
equilibrium of the whole western coun-
try, these conditions constituted a grave
menace to the future control of the inte-
rior by the Union. It is easy to believe
that, in the long run, Americans would
have settled the Mississippi Valley ; but
it is by no means so certain that these
Americans would, of necessity, have been
under the flag of the United States. In
these early years an independent con-
federacy under the protection of some
European flag was entirely within the
realm of possibility, if. not of probability,
as the history of Canada illustrates.
The first important diplomatic prob-
lem with which the new American gov-
ernment had to grapple arose in connec-
tion* with the so-called Nootka Sound
affair. In the autumn of 1789 Spain
seized certain English ships on their way
to establish a trading-post at Nootka
Sound on the Pacific. During the spring
and summer of 1790 active preparations
for war were made by both nations.
There was every reason to believe that
England would strike Spain in her vul-
nerable American empire, for from the
days of Drake, England had sought the
commerce of the Spanish colonies. In
such an event, Florida and New Or-
leans were likely to be seized, and in the
operations against Louisiana it was prob-
able that an army would descend the
Mississippi, crossing from the English
posts on the Great Lakes. In fact, at
this crisis England instructed the gov-
ernor of Canada to ascertain if the Ken-
tuckians would cooperate, using the ar-
gument that freedom of navigation of
the Mississippi would be more important
to them than an attempt to recover the
Great Lake posts by a Spanish alliance.
But the plans considered by Pitt were
more far-reaching than the acquisition of
Florida and Louisiana. At this point
one of the most interesting figures in the
history of the period appears upon the
scene, — Francesco Miranda, the Vene-
zuelan revolutionist, whose life was an
epic of diplomatic intrigue and adven-
ture. Shortly after the American Revo-
lution, Miranda visited the United States,
fired with the design of liberating Span-
ish America. He made the acquain-
tance of prominent officers like Hamilton
and Knox, and he afterward alleged that
he had received assurances from them
that New England would furnish troops
for a revolution in Spanish America if
Great Britain assisted with her navy.
Miranda then went to Europe to plead
his cause, visiting almost all the leading
countries of the Continent, and, at the
news of approaching hostilities between
Spain and Great Britain, he turned for
aid to the latter country. In February,
1790, in an interview with Pitt, he un-
folded to him his plans for breaking the
Spanish yoke in America by the aid of
English arms. His design contemplated
the formation of an independent consti-
tutional empire of the Spanish colonies,
including within its limits the vast ter-
ritory between the Mississippi and the
Pacific as far north as the forty-fifth de-
gree, and all of Central and South Amer-
ica, except Brazil and Guiana. Cuba was
to be included, " since the port of Havana
is the key to the Gulf of Mexico ; " but
the other West Indian islands, together
with* Florida, were apparently to be the
reward of England. In addition a lib-
eral commercial arrangement was to be
made, which should open to her the trade
of this great domain. Miranda also fur-
nished Pitt with reports on the military
conditions in Spanish America, and the
minister agreed that in the event of war
The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley. 681
he would take up the project. If hos-
tilities had begun, two expeditions were
to be sent to Spanish America, with
cooperation from India. New Orleans
was to be captured, and a plan for an
overland march from that city against
Mexico was considered.
While Miranda urged his far-reaching
schemes in London, another interesting
adventurer, William Augustus Bowles,
was fostering British interests among
the Southwestern Indians. In the course
of his wanderings, Bowles visited the
Bahamas, where he won the patronage
of Lord Dunmore, by whose connivance
he secured stores of English arms and
goods for the Gulf Indians, and was thus
made independent of the Spanish trad-
ing-posts. Becoming one of the principal
chiefs of the Lower Creeks, he conceived
the project of building up an indepen-
dent Indian nation, and at length he was
emboldened to ask of Spain two ports
on the coast of Florida. Failing to re-
ceive a favorable response, he deter-
mined to seek British assistance and to
march his Indians into Florida against
the Spanish posts, take New Orleans,
and thence advance against Mexico. In
1790 Bowles sailed for England, with
a delegation of Creeks and Cherokees,
where in January, 1791, he memorialized
the king in behalf of his plans. Utterly
absurd as his proposal seems, at first
sight, it was not without some prospect
of success, particularly since he intended
to call upon the Cumberland settlers for
aid, and to secure supplies from England.
He found additional arguments for Eng-
lish assistance in the prospect that the
United States would destroy the North-
ern Indians, while, on the other hand, a
general Indian confederacy, North and
South, under the leadership of the Creeks
and the Cherokees, would greatly in-
crease English influence.
These proposals were made too late
to affect English plans in the Nootka
Sound affair ; but they are significant
illustrations of the far-reaching influence
which England exercised upon our bor-
ders, by means of men whose actions she
could utilize or disavow as best suited the
circumstances ; and Pitt was at this time
receiving regular reports from his secret
agents in the United States in reference
to Florida, which he called his " South-
ern Farms." While the English govern-
ment did not encourage Bowles in his
plans of active hostility against the Unit-
ed States, it conceded him the free ports
which he asked in the West Indies. On
his return to the Southwest he achieved a
dominant influence among the Indians,
arousing the apprehensions both of Spain
and the United States, until, in 1792, the
Spaniards decoyed him on board one of
their vessels and carried him off a pris-
oner.
It was in connection with the Nootka
Sound affair that the United States first
seriously considered her destiny as a na-
tion in respect to the possession of New
Orleans. Many considerations favored
an alliance between the United States and
England against Spain. A war between
Spain and the United States seemed al-
most certain, if the Creeks under the
leadership of their half-breed chief, Alex-
ander McGillivray, continued to resist
the drawing of a boundary line on the
Georgia side satisfactory to the United
States ; for in the operations against them,
as General Knox, the Secretary of War,
pointed out, our troops would invade ter-
ritories claimed by Spain.
Washington decided in favor of neu-
trality, however, and in the summer of
1790 he made strenuous efforts to ad-
just our affairs on the frontier. He en-
gaged McGillivray in a treaty at New
York, whereby our difficulties with the
Creek Indians were temporarily tided
over; he issued a proclamation against
the Yazoo Company's filibustering expe-
dition, of which George Rogers Clark was
said to be the military leader, and he
took pains at the same time to quiet the
apprehensions of the authorities of Can-
ada by assuring them that Harmar's
682 The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley.
army, which was preparing to strike the
Northwestern Indians, was not destined
to attack the posts which England re-
tained on the Great Lakes.
The most serious question before the
government, however, was what attitude
to take in case England occupied Louis-
iana and Florida, and, particularly, what
to do in case she asked a passage for her
troops from Canada and the Great Lakes
across our Northwestern territory to the
Mississippi. As early as July an agent
of England was in New York, then the
seat of our government, watching our
policy, and sounding the leading mem-
bers of the government on the possibil-
ity of a connection between the United
States and England in the war, and on
our probable attitude if she attacked
Louisiana. The views of Congressman
Scott from western Pennsylvania, al-
though they were doubtless extreme, il-
lustrate the possibilities of the situation.
He said to the agent, " If Great Britain
had possession of the opening of the
Mississippi, her commercial enterprise
would give us a fair and liberal market
for our various exports, which is not now
the case; it would tend to people our
country, in consequence to give us more
weight in the general scale." " In these
ideas," he said, " all the people upon the
western waters are united." He fur-
ther suggested that Great Britain ought
to capture New Orleans, aided by opera-
tions on the upper Mississippi by Ameri-
can troops under General Knox, and,
after effecting this, " to conduct an army
to be formed in the Western country by
land from thence into Spanish America."
However, the English agent did not meet
with equally warm responses from the
members of the cabinet. When he hinted
to Alexander Hamilton that England's
arms would be turned against Spanish
America, Hamilton, much as he approved
a closer English connection, warned him
that the United States must possess New
Orleans, and expressed our repugnance
to an English enterprise against it.
It is the attitude of Thomas Jefferson,
then Secretary of State, that is particu-
larly interesting, however, not only be-
cause he had the immediate charge of
the diplomacy of the situation, but be-
cause here he first officially grappled with
the question, who should possess the Mis-
sissippi Valley, — a question which he,
as President, a little over a decade later,
was so triumphantly to answer. On the
news of the impending war, Jefferson
did not hesitate to express his alarm at
the prospective conquest by Great Britain
of Louisiana and the Floridas. " Em-
braced from the St. Croix to the St.
Mary's on the one side by their posses-
sions, on the other by their fleet," he
wrote to Monroe, " we need not hesitate
to say that they would soon find means
to unite to them all the territory covered
by the ramifications of the Mississippi."
Thus, he declared, in the notes which he
drew up for his own guidance, England
would have possessions double the size
of ours, as good in soil and climate, and,
instead of two neighbors balancing each
other, we should have one with more than
the strength of both. It would be hope-
less, he thought, to make war against
England without securing France as an
ally, and he characteristically decided
that our wisest policy was to delay and
watch our opportunity to obtain from the
allies a price for our assistance. Such a
price might be found in the independence
of Louisiana and the Floridas. He there-
fore determined to secure the good of-
fices of France to induce Spain to cede
us the island of New Orleans. Realizing,
however, that this proposal would at first
seem extreme to the French Minister,
he advised our representative to France
to urge that country simply to recommend
to Spain the cession in general terms of
" a port near the mouth of the river with
a circumadjacent territory sufficient for
its support, well defined and extra-terri-
torial to Spain, leaving the idea to future
growth." This was the idea that grew
until the "circumadjacent territory"
The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley. 683
broadened into the vast prairies and
plains between the Rocky Mountains
and the Mississippi River. Jefferson was
not without doubts of the intentions of
France herself, for he warned our re-
presentative that her recent minister had
conceived the project of again " engag-
ing France in a colony " upon our conti-
nent ; but with a cheerful optimism that
casts light upon his later actions, he
added that he suspected France the less
since her National Assembly had consti-
tutionally excluded conquest from the ef-
fort of their government !
To our representative at Madrid he
gave directions to point out that more
than half the American territory and
forty thousand fighting men were within
the Mississippi basin. If Spain would
not concede the right of navigation, either
we must lose the West, which would seek
other alliances, or we must wrest what
we wanted from Spain. He was there-
fore to suggest the cession of New Or-
leans and Florida, and to argue that thus
we could protect for Spain what lay be-
yond the Mississippi. In the light of
subsequent events, Jefferson's argument
on this point is amusing. It would be
safer for Spain that we should be her
neighbor rather than England, he rea-
soned, since conquest is not in our prin-
ciples, and is inconsistent with our gov-
ernment ; and he added that it would
not be to our interest to cross the Missis-
sippi for ages, and would never be to
our interest to remain united with those
who do.
In his instructions to our agent in
England, he pointed out the consequences
of that nation's acquiring Louisiana and
Florida, and required him to intimate
to the English government that " a due
balance on our borders is not less desir-
able to us than a balance of power in Eu-
rope has always appeared to them." He
offered neutrality conditioned on Eng-
land's executing the treaty of 1783 fair-
ly and attempting no conquests adjoin-
ing us.
Thus we see Jefferson's Louisiana
system fully unfolded as early as 1790.
There is the characteristic passion for
peace, which leads him to determine to
await events in spite of his vigorous dip-
lomatic representations, and there is a
naive confidence in the unwillingness of
France to conquer, and of the United
States to expand by war ; but there is at
the same time a firm grasp of the impor-
tance of the Mississippi and the Gulf to
the future of the United States, and a far-
sighted vision of our need of a doctrine
of balance of power in the New World,
— a germ of the Monroe Doctrine.
The correspondence of Washington's
cabinet officers reveals the fact that
England would have met no forcible
resistance had she sent an army from
the Great Lakes down the Mississippi to
take possession of New Orleans. Once
there, a liberal policy toward the west-
ern settlers, and an efficient defense by
her fleet, would have placed her in a po-
sition difficult of attack.
This first diplomatic discussion of the
future of the Mississippi Valley by the
new government of the United States
served its purpose by turning the vision
of American statesmen to this horizon
line of our future, rather than by result-
ing in immediate action. France, then
in the beginnings of her revolution, broke
away from her Spanish alliance by de-
claring the family compact between the
two courts inapplicable to the new state
of affairs. Thus isolated, Spain was
obliged to sign a convention with Eng-
land in 1790, which terminated the pros-
pect of war between the two powers.
Spain's first movements after this epi-
sode were to give definite orders to per-
mit no American settlements on the Mis-
sissippi below the mouth of the Ohio, and
to send an agent to reside among the
Creek Indians in order to prevent the
running of the boundary line between
them and Georgia, which had been
agreed upon by the New York treaty.
In response, the United States sent an
684 The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley.
agent of its own with instructions to su-
persede McGillivray, and become him-
self the chief of the Creeks.
Thus, both in the Southwest and the
Northwest, a situation existed similar to
that which has been seen in Afghanistan,
and other buffer states, where in recent
times Russia and England have contend-
ed for dominant influence. The storm
centre rested among the savages, and in
the Southwest, as in the Northwest, a
chance spark might have produced a war.
Negotiations were transferred to Madrid,
where the American representatives were
cleverly amused by the Spanish diplo-
mats for several years. By the close of
1792, England was still persistent in her
support of the Northwestern Indians by
advice of resident agents, by equipment
in arms, and by her retention of the posts,
and Spain was as impervious as ever in
the Southwest. The conditions aroused
the fears of the government that these
two nations had a common understanding
against the United States.
These circumstances, together with the
uncertain state of affairs in Europe,
where England and Spain were joining
in opposition to France, led Hamilton in
the fall of 1792 to advocate an alliance
with England, but Washington declared
this remedy worse than the disease. Be-
fore the close of the year, however, even
Washington came reluctantly to the con-
clusion that an ally might be needed,
and he broached to Jefferson the idea of
a closer connection with France. This
met with eager sympathy from the Sec-
retary of State, who avowed that a French
alliance was his polar star. It is hardly
necessary to point out that an alliance
with any European power at this juncture
in European events would have plunged
us in the state system of the Old World,
and would have opened the Mississippi
Valley to conquest by one or the other
of these powers. Washington, in fact,
adhered to neutrality, which was, un-
doubtedly, our true policy, for in little
more than a decade the western settlers
became strong enough to insure our pos-
session of the interior.
While the American government con-
sidered the question of European alli-
ances, the results of the breaking of the
family compact between France and
Spain were making themselves manifest.
It is a significant illustration of the im-
portance of Spanish America in the di-
plomacy of the period of the French
Revolution that one of the early efforts
of France to prevent the coalition against
her was an attempt to detach England
by an offer to join with her in breaking
the power of Spain in the New World.
The rupture of the family compact had
left France free to prey upon the spoils
of her late ally, and in the spring and
early fall of 1792 she sent two successive
missions to London, in which Talleyrand
served, to win British alliance by the
offer of a joint attack upon the colonial
possessions of Spain. The emancipation
of these colonies would give their com-
merce to England, and the fact that
Miranda, now high in favor in France,
had already furnished Pitt with infor-
mation that Spanish America was ripe
for revolt must have added temptation
to the bait. But England, alarmed by
the fall of the royal power in France,
was in no mood to accept that nation as
a partner in this plan of exploitation, and
France was thrown back upon the United
States. Brissot dominated the foreign
policy of France at this time. He had
recently traveled in the United States,
was acquainted with the disaffection in
the West, believed the Alleghanies a
natural boundary to the United States,
and knew that the frontiersmen were
keenly ready to attack the Spaniards at
the mouth of their great river. He
reckoned also on the ability of France to
recall to their old allegiance the French
population of Louisiana and Canada.
The French leaders seem first to have
determined to send Miranda as governor
to San Domingo, whence he could organ-
The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley. 685
ize an expedition against Spanish Amer-
ica. "Once masters of the Dutch ma-
rine," wrote Dumouriez, " we shall be
able to crush England, particularly by
interesting the United States in the sup-
port of our colonies, and in executing a
supei'b project of General Miranda." It
was indeed a vast project, combining in
a single system the movements to unite
the French and Dutch fleets, and thus to
make possible a sea power that should
enable France, aided by American fron-
tiersmen, to attack Spain's colonial em-
pire, using the French West Indies as a
base.
If the United States would cooperate
in freeing Canada, Louisiana, and Flor-
ida, our alliance was to be sought. It
was hoped that at the worst only a nomi-
nal neutrality would be declared, and
that events on our distant frontier would
not be checked by the government of the
United States. The French ministers
informed Colonel Smith, the son-in-law
of Vice President Adams, that they in-
tended to begin the attack at the mouth
of the Mississippi, and to sweep along
the Bay of Mexico southwardly, and that
they would have no objection to our in-
corporating the two Floridas.
Under these circumstances France de-
termined to send Genet as minister to
this country. This interesting character
had represented the French government
in Russia with so much enthusiasm in
the opening of the Revolution that the
Empress Catherine dubbed him "un
demagogue enrage," and in the summer
of 1792 he was forced to leave that coun-
try. His instructions required him to
negotiate a new treaty with the United
States, which should consolidate the com-
mercial and political interests of the two
nations, and establish a close connection
for extending the empire of liberty. Such
a compact, it was stated, " would conduce
rapidly to freeing Spanish America, to
opening the navigation of the Mississippi
to the inhabitants of Kentucky, to de-
livering our ancient brothers of Louis-
iana from the tyrannical yoke of Spain,
and perhaps to uniting the fair star of
Canada to the American constellation."
Genet was required to devote himself to
convincing the Americans of the feasi-
bility of these vast designs. But if the
United States should take a wavering
and timid course, while waiting for the
government to make common cause with
France, he was to take all measures
which comported with his position to
arouse in Louisiana, and in the other
provinces of America adjacent to the
United States, the principles of liberty
and independence. Kentucky, it was
pointed out, would probably second his
efforts, without compromising Congress,
and he was authorized to send agents
there and to Louisiana, where the fires
of revolution were ready to break out
among the French population.
This programme of revolutionary pro-
paganda was reiterated in an additional
set of instructions, when the approaching
rupture with England and Spain became
evident. Thus the French government
imposed upon Genet the duty of intrigue
in Kentucky and the conquest of Louis-
iana, not as a minor element in his mis-
sion, but as one of its main purposes, —
a fact which has been ignored in the
treatment of his career by most histo-
rians.
Hardly had this new representative
of France reached Charleston early in
April, 1793, when he began his negotia-
tions for the proposed expedition against
Florida and Louisiana. He found Gov-
ernor Moultrie of South Carolina friend-
ly, for this state, as well as Georgia, was
suffering from the hostility of the Chero-
kees and the Creeks on her frontiers,
and would gladly have seen the Span-
iards driven from the Gulf states by an
alliance with France.
Without difficulty Mangourit, the
French consul at Charleston, enlisted the
services of important leaders. In order
to rally the Georgia frontiersmen, he pro-
cured the cooperation of Samuel Ham-
686 The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley.
mond, a well-known Georgian, who had
taken part in the Revolution as a colonel
of cavalry, and had been surveyor-gen-
eral at Savannah. His importance is
shown by the fact that he was later a
member of Congress, and after the ac-
quisition of Louisiana was made military
and civil commandant of Upper Louis-
iana from 1805 to 1824. While Ham-
mond was to gather the forces of interior
Georgia for a descent upon St. Augus-
tine, another frontiersman, William Tate,
who afterwards figured in a French ex-
pedition to Ireland, was to organize the
backwoodsmen of the Carolinas for a
descent upon New Orleans by way of the
Tennessee River and the Mississippi.
From Charleston Genet proceeded to
Philadelphia, where he found himself
the hero of the hour. In spite of Wash-
ington's proclamation of neutrality, is-
sued on the 22d of April, the masses of
the American people were strongly in
sympathy with the young French Repub-
lic, to which they seemed to be bound
not only by ties of gratitude, but also by
treaty obligations, and by the bond of
sympathy existing between sister repub-
lics. Jefferson himself regarded the
proclamation as pusillanimous. Carried
away by the popular enthusiasm for the
French cause, Genet quickly determined
to proceed with high hand, being confi-
dent of his ability to secure a reversal
of the majority in Congress in case the
administration opposed his plans. In
Philadelphia he was handed by his pre-
decessor a letter from General George
Rogers Clark of Kentucky, written at
Louisville early in February, 1793. Clark
had fallen into intemperate habits at this
time. He had previously involved him-
self in plans for a filibustering attack
upon the Yazoo, Virginia had rejected
his claims for Revolutionary expenses,
and he felt that the United States had
been ungrateful for his services : so he
offered his sword to France. He de-
clared that he could raise fifteen hundred
men, and he believed that the French
at St. Louis and throughout the rest of
Louisiana, together with the American
subjects at the Natchez, would flock to
his standard. With the first fifteen hun-
dred, he declared that he could take all
of Louisiana for France, beginning at
St. Louis, and with the assistance of two
or three frigates at the mouth of the
Mississippi, he would engage to subdue
New Orleans and the rest of Louisiana.
" If farther aided," said he, " I would
capture Pensacola ; and if Santa Fee
and the rest of New Mexico were ob-
jects — I know their strength and every
avenue leading to them." " When any
opportunity offered, I had it uniformly
in view, to give a vital blow to the Span-
iards in this quarter." Such, in brief,
was the proposal, apt for his purposes,
which Genet found as he took up his
work in Philadelphia in May.
He was met by the refusal of the gov-
ernment to afford him funds by making
an advance payment on our debt to
France. Finding Washington — " the
old Washington," as he called him — in-
flexible in his policy of strict neutrality,
Genet turned eagerly to the programme
of revolution. By the middle of June he
wrote home that he was arming Kentucky,
and preparing a general insurrection in
the provinces adjoining the United States.
For the Kentucky enterprise he selected,
as his secret agent, Michaux, a French
botanist, whose researches in tins' field
have made him well known. Michaux
had been picked out by Jefferson at the
beginning of this year to lead an expe-
dition across the continent to discover a
practicable means of reaching the Pacific
by way of the Missouri. This exploring
expedition now served as a useful cloak
for Genet's design. Toward the close
of June he drew up instructions for Mi-
chaux which required him to point out the
probable failure of the negotiations at-
tempted between Spain and the United
States for the opening of the Mississippi,
and the desire of France to promote the
prosperity of Kentucky by giving to it
The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley. 687
the freedom of navigation of that river.
To this end he was to concert plans with
General Clark, and with General Benja-
min Logan, another of the famous pio-
neer leaders of Kentucky. Genet had
the audacity to read these instructions
to Secretary Jefferson in an interview
which took place some time before the
5th of July, 1793. He gave Jefferson
the impression that the purpose of France
was to establish Louisiana and Florida
as free republics, commercially allied
with both the United States and France.
Jefferson called his attention to the fact
that an attempt to raise an army of citi-
zens of the United States within our bor-
ders would violate our neutrality, and
would result in the punishment of the of-
fenders, but he added that if this diffi-
culty were avoided, he did not care what
insurrections were incited in New Or-
leans. Indeed, Genet in his own account
of this interview declares that the secre-
tary went further, and added that a little
spontaneous invasion would promote the
interests of the United States. This was
a remarkable conversation. In 1790,
Jefferson, alarmed at the prospect of an
English possession of New Orleans, had
expressed sentiments which showed full
realization of the danger to American
power if this city should fall into the
hands of a strong nation ; and again,
when he learned in 1802 that Louisiana
had been ceded to Napoleon, he made his
famous statement, " There is on the globe
one single spot, the possessor of which is
our natural and habitual enemy. It is
New Orleans. . . . The day that France
takes possession of New Orleans fixes the
sentence that is to restrain her within her
low water mark. . . . From that mo-
ment we must marry ourselves to the
British fleet and nation . . . holding
the two continents of America in seques-
tration for the common purposes of the
United British and American nations."
How happened it that Jefferson, so
fierce in his insistence upon the impor-
tance of New Orleans to the United States
in 1802, should have been willing to see
the city taken by an expedition of Ameri-
can frontiersmen under the flag of France ?
In answer it must be said that as yet
Jefferson had not learned to distrust the
purposes of the French Republic. He
still was in sympathy with its fundamen-
tal ideas, and believed in the disinter-
estedness of its crusade in behalf of lib-
erty. In the second place, Genet had
put the proposition before him as that of
an attempt to create an independent re-
public, not to make a French acquisition.
Moreover, war between the United States
and Spain seemed inevitable at this time.
In June the protests of the Spanish
agents to the American government over
its attitude were so vehement that it
seemed clear that war upon the Creeks
would precipitate hostilities with Spain,
and yet their depredations upon our bor-
der, and the need of supporting the
friendly Chickasaws, made such a war al-
most a necessity. To meet the exigency
Washington sent a special messenger in
July to Madrid to explain the situation,
and to secure a categorical answer from
Spain in regard to her pretensions among
the Indians within our limits, and as to
whether she would regard an attack upon
the Creeks as hostility against herself.
Spain evaded an answer, and the Louis-
iana authorities redoubled their efforts
to consolidate the Indians against the
United States. The attitude of England
in the Northwest, as we have seen, gave
strong grounds for suspecting that she
was following a joint policy with Spain.
Acting on the hint already received, that
France might consent to our incorporat-
ing the Floridas, Jefferson, with the ap-
proval of Washington, had, in the spring
of this year, revised his original proposi-
tions, and instructed our representative
at Madrid not to give a guarantee of the
Spanish possessions across the Missis-
sippi in return for the cession of those
on the eastern side. It is clear that he
had reached the conclusion that it would
be for the interest of the United States
688 The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississip2)i Valley.
to make an ally of France in the expected
war against Spain. The terms of the
alliance might be adjusted later, and he
doubtless believed that if once the Ameri-
can frontiersmen were in possession of
New Orleans, the interests of the United
States were not likely to suffer. Jeffer-
son therefore committed himself to the
extent of giving to Michaux a letter of
introduction to the governor of Ken-
tucky, in which he mentioned that Mi-
chaux had the confidence of the French
Minister.
After this interview, Genet pushed his
preparations rapidly forward. He sent
to George Rogers Clark a letter accept-
ing his proposals and authorizing him to
take the title of major-general and com-
mander in chief of the independent and
revolutionary legion of the Mississippi,
promising him further to use his influ-
ence to obtain for him the grade of field
marshal of France. On July 12, he
defied the orders of the United States,
and allowed the Little Democrat, a re-
cently captured vessel whose status was
in dispute, to drop down the Delaware
and go to sea. In this action he was the
more urgent because he proposed to use
her to blockade the Mississippi in sup-
port of Clark's descent of the river upon
New Orleans. Three days later Michaux
departed to initiate the expedition in
Kentucky.
Genet's high-handed proceedings and
his utterances, which were construed to
threaten an appeal from Washington to
the people, made the Little Democrat
episode the turning-point in his mission.
He lost his influential friends, and the
popular sentiment gradually swung away
from him. But his activity in organizing
his secret expedition continued. Shortly
after the affair of the Little Democrat
he learned of the arrival of a French
squadron at New York, and determined
to use this naval force against New-
foundland, to recapture St. Pierre and
Miquelon, burn Halifax, then feebly
defended, and on its return, to send it,
after the October winds were over,
against New Orleans. This plan was
quickly disclosed both to the Spanish and
English authorities. On receiving in-
formation from the Spanish representa-
tives, Secretary Jefferson wrote to the
governor of Kentucky to prevent the
expedition, informing him that it was
against Kentucky's real interest to permit
it. The preparations in Kentucky dur-
ing the rest of the year were hampered
by lack of money, although Clark was
collecting supplies and boats, and offering
inducements to volunteers. In October,
Genet prepared to hasten the departure
of the fleet in two divisions : one to Can-
ada, whither he was sending his emis-
saries to stir up the French people, and
the other to take on board the Georgia
troops for the conquest of Florida. At
the same time he sent a delegation of
Frenchmen to Kentucky to arouse the
democratic societies in the West, and
to assist in organizing the Mississippi
expedition. One of these Frenchmen
proved a traitor, and divulged this phase
of the scheme to the Spanish agents.
The United States made prompt pro-
visions to restrain it, ordering the use
of force if necessary. Governor Shelby
of Kentucky, however, anxious to stim-
ulate the interest of the government in
securing the freedom of the river, alarmed
the Federal authorities by replying that
he doubted his legal right to prevent
men from emigrating from Kentucky
with arms in their hands, and the west-
ern societies drew up vigorous memorials
denouncing the indifference of the gov-
ernment to their rights.
Carondelet was in despair. He warned
his government that upper Louisiana
would fall into the hands of the enemy
under Clark, and if an attack on New
Orleans by the fleet occurred, all Louis-
iana would succumb with the greatest
ease and rapidity. The total force avail-
able for the defense of the colony amount-
ed to only 1620 men, stretched out over
600 leagues of river navigation. The
The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley. 689
New Orleans Frenchmen were ready to
join the invaders, and if Walnut Hills
(Vicksburg) and Natchez were taken, he
declared, " I shall have no other re-
source than an honorable surrender, or
to perish in defense of the redout of San
Carlos with my regular troops." He
added that he did not doubt the success
of the enemy in marching upon Santa F^.
Sending urgent demands to Spain for re-
inforcements, in desperation he also wrote
to the English in Canada asking succor.
On February 10, 1794, the Canadian
governor, Lord Dorchester, believing
war between England and the United
States at hand, had issued his proclama-
tion to the Indians, telling them that he
expected that the boundary between them
and the United States would have to
be drawn by the warriors. Carondelet's
letter begging English aid reached Lieu-
tenant-Governor Simcoe at Miami Rapids
in April, whither the latter had advanced
his forces to meet the expected attack
by General Wayne. To the overtures of
the Spanish officer Simcoe gave a sym-
pathetic answer, regretting that his own
situation prevented him from detaching
troops for the support of St. Louis, but
inclosing Dorchester's speech as evidence
of England's attitude.
Finding difficulty in using the French
fleet, Genet had postponed the attack
until spring. As yet George Rogers
Clark had not brought an army into the
field, excepting a company which guarded
the mouth of the Ohio, but later he re-
ported that he could have gotten as many
men as he chose. In the Charleston re-
gion recruiting had been checked by the
resolutions of the South Carolina As-
sembly in December against the expedi-
tion (the Southern planters were alarmed
by the French incitement of negro in-
surrection in San Domingo), but Tate
professed himself ready to move in the
spring down the Tennessee with 2000
Carolina frontiersmen, and Hammond
expected 1500 Georgians to rendezvous
for the capture of St. Augustine in con-
VOL. xciu. — NO. 559. 44
cert with the French fleet in the middle
of March. The French agents were also
negotiating treaties with the Creeks and
Cherokees, the ancient allies of France.
Making liberal allowances for the exag-
geration of the frontier leaders, success
seemed possible in the southern region.
But, at the moment of hope, Genet's
career was cut short, and the affair ter-
minated by the arrival of a new minister,
Fauchet, with instructions to terminate
the expedition. This he did by his pro-
clamation, issued March 6, 1794.
In order to understand this turn in
events, we must briefly recall the situa-
tion in France. Hardly had Genet
reached Philadelphia at the beginning
of his mission, when his friends, the
Girondist party, fell, and the reign of
terror under the Mountain began. That
awful summer, with civil war, military
reverses, and a dozen countries in arms
against France, was no time for conquest
in another hemisphere, even if the Jaco-
bins had desired to support the minister.
But Genet was denounced by Robespierre
as one of the Girondists, and France lent
a ready ear to the demands of Washing-
ton for his recall. Genet's arrest was
therefore ordered, and instructions given
to terminate the expedition.
By conniving at the designs of France,
Washington could have made the expe-
dition a success, but his consistent policy
of neutrality, which constituted a land-
mark in the history of international law
on this subject, had saved the nation
from war under French leadership, and
from the loss of the Mississippi Valley.
Hardly had the French danger passed,
when we were on the eve of a conflict
with England. The threatening attitude
of that country in the Northwest, while
Wayne's preparations against the Indi-
ans were in progress, has already been
referred to. Suspecting that we were to
unite with France, the English officials
prepared to resist an attack. As soon
as the American government learned
690 The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley.
of Simcoe's threatening advance toward
Wayne's forces, the Secretary of State
informed the British representative that
his act was hostility itself. At the same
time, England's aggressions on our neu-
tral commerce had become intolerable.
Preparations were hurriedly made for
war; Congress passed laws calling out
troops, laid an embargo on English
goods, and provided for the fortification
of American harbors. In the summer
of 1794, General Wayne faced the sav-
ages under the guns of the British fort
at Miami Rapids, and in the decisive
battle of Fallen Timbers he crushed the
Indian power of the Northwest. The
British commander promptly addressed
an inquiry to General Wayne, demand-
ing to know his purpose in making such
near approaches to the garrison, and the
taunting reply of " Mad Anthony " was
that " the most full and satisfactory an-
swer was announced from the muzzles
of my small arms yesterday morning in
the action against the heard of Savages
in the vicinity of your Post ; which ter-
minated gloriously to the American arms
— but had it continued until the Indians,
etc., were drove under the influence of
the Post and Guns you mention — they
would not much have impeded the pro-
gress of the Victorious army under my
control." To this fiery challenge the
commander of the British wrote a mod-
erate letter avowing his anxiety to pre-
vent a war which might be approved by
neither of the governments. He re-
fused to abandon the post, and declared
that a further approach within reach of
his cannon was impossible " without ex-
pecting the consequences attending it."
Wayne reconnoitred the fort in all
points, quite in sight, covered by his
light infantry and riflemen, and the
British commander wrote to his govern-
ment : " It was extremely insolent, but
he will never do it again with impunity."
Finally, failing to precipitate hostilities
by the British, Wayne withdrew his
troops. Thus narrowly was war averted
at this critical time when it needed but
a spark applied to the cannon of this
fort to precipitate a conflict which would
have involved the Mississippi Valley.
But Washington had before this deter-
mined upon a final effort to preserve the
peace, and had sent Chief Justice Jay to
make a treaty with England. The close
of 1794 (November 19) was marked by
the success of Jay's mission. The Brit-
ish agreed to evacuate the posts, and, in
1795, Wayne forced the Northwestern
Indians to a treaty by which they yielded
the larger portion of the present state
of Ohio, and abandoned their effort to
make the Ohio River a barrier to the
advance of civilization. Thus matters
were in train for our acquisition of the
Northwest.
In the Southwest, also, the sudden con-
cession of our rights by Spain after a de-
cade of steadfast refusal was as dramatic
as it was significant. Godoy, the Prime
Minister, had for the past two years been
reading the alarming dispatches of Ca-
rondelet, exhibiting the weakness of Lou-
isiana, the danger of the advance of
American settlement, and the menace of
French invasion. Writing of the settle-
ment of the lands beyond the Alleghany
Mountains, Carondelet declared : —
"This vast and restless population,
progressively driving the Indian tribes
before them and upon us, seek to pos-
sess themselves of all the extensive re-
gions which the Indians occupy between
the Ohio and Mississippi rivers, the
Gulf of Mexico, and the Appalachian
Mountains, thus becoming our neighbors,
at the same time that they menacingly
ask for the free navigation of the Missis-
sippi. If they achieve their object, their
ambitions would not be confined to this
side of the Mississippi. Their writings,
public papers, and speeches, all turn on
this point, the free navigation of the
Gulf by the rivers . . . which empty
into it, the rich fur-trade of the Missouri,
and in time the possession of the rich
mines of the interior provinces of the
The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley. 691
very Kingdom of Mexico. Their mode
of growth and their policy are as for-
midable for Spain as their armies. . . .
Their roving spirit and the readiness
with which they procure sustenance and
shelter facilitate rapid settlement. A
rifle and a little corn meal in a bag are
enough for an American wandering
alone in the woods for a month. . . .
With logs crossed upon each other he
makes a house, and even an impregna-
ble fort against the Indians. . . . Cold
does not terrify him, and when a family
wearies of one place, it moves to another
and settles there with the same ease.
" If such men come to occupy the
banks of the Mississippi and Missouri,
or secure their navigation, doubtless no-
thing will prevent them from crossing
and penetrating into our provinces on
the other side, which, being to a great
extent unoccupied, can oppose no re-
sistance. But even if this were not the
case, who could warrant that the few
inhabitants would not unite with joy
and eagerness with the men who offered
them aid and protection in securing in-
dependence, self-government, and self-
taxation, and who flatter them with the
spirit of liberty, the hope of free, exten-
sive, and lucrative commerce, etc. In my
opinion, a general revolution in America
threatens Spain unless the remedy be ap-
plied promptly."
Convinced that Spain must have peace,
Godoy, in the summer of 1795, made the
treaty of Bale with France, which gained
for him the title of Prince of Peace.
This brought Spain under the influence
of France during the rest of the period
which we are to consider. When Thomas
Pinckney arrived as minister from the
United States, Godoy suggested to him
the desirability of an alliance between
Spain, France, and the United States ;
but Pinckney was not diverted from the
main theme. While the negotiations
went on, the news of the successful ter-
mination of Jay's mission to England
reached Spain. After submitting to the
delays as long as he deemed it profita-
ble, Pinckney suddenly announced that
he was about to leave Madrid for Lon-
don, and asked Godoy if he had any
commissions for him. This veiled threat
was interpreted as implying an offensive
arrangement between England and the
United States, leveled against Spain's
colonies. Godoy had no desire to place
Spain at the mercy of France with two
such enemies on the borders of Louisi-
ana. Within three days he agreed to
the treaty of San Lorenzo, October 27,
1795, whereby Spain conceded our south-
western boundaries and the freedom of
navigation of the Mississippi, and agreed
to evacuate the ports within our limits on
the eastern bank of the river.
Thus, toward the close of Washing-
ton's administration, changed conditions
brought about new combinations and in-
trigues among the European nations for
controlling the destiny of the Mississippi
Valley. In appearance the United States
had gained control of the river. But
the victorious French Republic tried to
dominate the policy of its dependent
Spanish ally after 1795, and under the
plea of protecting her remaining Amer-
ican empire against the expanding forces
of the United States, demanded of Spain
the cession of Louisiana and the Flor-
idas. Convinced that the United States
had fallen under English control, France
considered a war with the United States
as not unlikely, and laid plans for acquir-
ing the lands between the Alleghanies
and the Mississippi, as well as Louisiana
and the Floridas. The development of
these forces until they result in the Louis-
iana Purchase will be the subject of a
second paper.
Frederick J. Turner.
(To be continued.)
692
The Judge.
THE JUDGE.
THE Judge rode slowly up the valley
of the Kennebec on his way to County
Court at Norridgewock. There were
not wanting stagecoaches between the
state capital and his destination, and
in the stable of his sumptuous home,
in the suburbs of Maine's largest city,
were coach and pair far more in keep-
ing with the judicial dignity than the
sturdy bay beneath him and the worn
saddlebags which formed a part of his
modest equipment. Legal gentlemen
whom the Judge encountered in his
journey surveyed him with surprise not
unmingled with disapproval. Had he
not been chosen from among themselves
to uphold with dignity the legal majesty
and honor of the whole state? Yet
here he was, traveling like a country
lawyer, without attendant, and in mud-
spattered raiment.
The Judge, unconscious of criticism,
rode on in humility of spirit such as he
had not known in the three years he had
sat upon the judicial bench. Not politi-
cal preference, but personal integrity
joined with brilliancy of mind, had won
for him the highest honors in his state's
bestowal, and Judge Preston had ac-
cepted them as a call to higher duties,
yet with unbiased recognition of his
own worth. To-day, riding leisurely
along the fragrant valley, with the wide
river glistening upon his right, and
rounded hills of pasture, field, and wood-
land rising above him on the left, he
questioned for the first time his fitness
for the high position. The Judge was
on his way to hold court for the first
time in his native county. He glanced
downward at himself, as the bay horse,
with drooping head, climbed the long
hill, from the summit of which the vil-
lage of Bloomfield would be visible, and
hastily removed his riding gloves, while
the reins lay loosely upon the horse's
neck. "I should n't want them to feel
I had grown stuck up, " the Judge as-
sured himself, falling unconsciously into
the vernacular of his younger days. He
put the gloves on again in a moment;
for the white hand, with its finger ring
of gold, bore no resemblance to the
sturdy brown fist which had been wont
to hold the plough or hoe handle for
hours of each summer morning, before
its owner walked cheerily along this
same road to study at Bloomfield Acad-
emy. Indeed, the hand emphasized
far more forcibly than did the glove
the change which years had brought.
The Judge sighed, but lifted his head a
moment later to recall, with boyish en-
thusiasm long unknown, a woodchuck
hole in yonder wall, and hastily repelled
an inclination to dismount. His eyes,
grown keen in long study of human
faces, rested upon the blossoming or-
chard beyond the wall, passing over the
"cider apple trees " nearest the road to
the well-remembered "summer sweet-
ings " farther on. The Judge's mouth
watered. "I wish it was three months
later, " he declared to his bay horse with
unjudicial fervor.
He drew rein for a moment on the
summit. The village had grown half-
way up the hills ; one church spire was
missing from the old common, while
two, which were strangers to the Judge,
pointed heavenward from the Island.
Columns of smoke marked the enter-
prises which had changed the quiet
country village of his remembrance to
a bustling manufacturing town. The
Judge remembered, with a homesick
pang, that old Bloomfield was Bloom-
field no longer, but had become merged
in one with its sister town across the
river, under another name. "I won't
stop here an hour," he determined with
resentment quite foreign to the calm
brain, whose freedom from emotional
qualities was believed by his colleagues
The Judge.
693
to be the secret of Judge Preston's un-
erring judgment. Stiffly erect he rode
down the long hill into the village, but
resentment softened into retrospection
as he went.
There was the old mill by Courrier
Brook, where a barefoot boy upon a
gaunt white horse had gone with grist ;
and beyond it the shady river bank,
where a student had sat with lunch and
books through the sunny hour of noon.
He stopped his horse before a square
building, the second story of which had
once been the public hall. From its cob-
webbed windows notes from long past
singing-schools seemed to echo. The
Judge looked slowly up to its roof in
some disappointment. " I thought it
was higher, " he said in a puzzled tone.
A low room over the village cobbler's
shop had been his first law office. The
whole building, it appeared, was now oc-
cupied as a dwelling, and a pile of bed-
ding protruded from the window, behind
which he had sat in delicious idleness,
all unappreciated in those days, wait-
ing for clients.
Faces from open doorways and upon
the street surveyed the traveler with
mild curiosity, but without sign of re-
cognition. Upon some of them the
Judge thoughtfully traced family re-
semblances to former townsmen, and
struggled with his mental arithmetic
to determine whether they might be
acquaintances of his youth or another
generation who knew him not. He
stopped suddenly before a low brown
house where a gray-haired man was
sawing wood in a spiritless manner.
"That's Hiram Jennings!" decided
the Judge without hesitation. " I
should have known him anywhere."
But when the sawyer, with an air of one
quite willing to delay his work, came
toward the gate, the Judge, embarrassed,
turned his head aside, and humbly in-
quired the way to Norridgewock, over a
road which he and Hiram Jennings had
traveled side by side upon many a youth-
ful excursion. He rode on thoughtfully.
The wood sawyer had been the only
pupil who outranked himself at the
Academy, whose brick walls shone
through the foliage on yonder hill.
" He seems satisfied enough, " the Judge
assured himself. " Maybe he 's never
realized any difference, and I should n't
want to be the one to remind him of it
now that it 's years too late."
The village was behind him now, and
spires of the county seat five miles be-
yond rose among the hills. The Judge
stopped by a watering-trough in the
cool shadow of the woodland and looked
absently about him. A moment later
he dismounted with a half-guilty air;
there was no one in sight, — even the
bay horse, with nose buried deeply in the
clear water, was intent upon his own
refreshment. Judge Preston sat upon
a mossy knoll while his white fingers
searched eagerly among the leaves, and
forgot for a moment all his hardly
acquired stores of legal knowledge as
he tasted "young iv'ries " for the first
time in thirty years. There was a
crimson Benjamin in the buttonhole of
his coat as he rose to mount his horse
again. Then, for the first time, he
heard the sound of voices at a little dis-
tance, and caught, behind a screen of
birch trees, the flutter of a muslin dress.
A tall young man approached him bash-
fully, drawing with him a seemingly
reluctant maiden, whose cheeks rivaled
the pink roses in her summer bonnet.
" I did n't know but what you might
be a lawyer, " the young man explained.
Judge Preston assented. "Why,
yes, I suppose I am — a kind of law-
yer," he said.
"Lawyer enough to marry folks? "
persisted the youth eagerly, while the
girl's color deepened.
"Oh yes, " the Judge responded read-
ily. It was exactly a quarter of a cen-
tury since he first performed a marriage
ceremony in the low-ceiled office down
yonder, but it seemed like yesterday as
he recalled it. The girl had had
pink cheeks and a summer dress like
694
The Judge.
this one. Looking closer, he observed
that this one, too, had been crying, and
wondered if it were an emotion com-
mon to brides. The Judge himself had
never married.
"You see," the bridegroom said in
a confidential tone, "we walked out to
the Falls this afternoon to get the thing
fixed up. But Elder Hook was down
with measles, which we ain't neither of
us ever had, and the Baptist minister 'd
gone to Augusty to tend a funeral, —
some connection of his, I understood.
Wa'n't it, Miny?"
"His wife's cousin," supplemented
the bride. "He died with fever real
sudden they said."
"I wish't he 'd waited," declared
the young man regretfully. "We
thought of goin' to Squire Clark, but
he tried a lawsuit against Miny's fa-
ther once, and besides, havin' made up
our minds to a religious weddin', we
could n't seem to bring 'em down to
a legal one."
"I see," said the Judge thought-
fully. The maiden wiped her eyes.
"She's all tired out," the bride-
groom explained. " We ought to rode,
but my gray colt was lame, and both
our folks was ploughin'. Miny would
n't minded the walk commonly, but she
set up late last night to finish her dress,
and stood to the cake-board all the
mornin' rollin' pie-crust and mixin'
dough for a little kind of house warm-
in' we was goin' to have to-night. The
fuss and furbelows that goes with gettin'
married nowadays is terrible wearin' on
womenfolks. Well, we got back here,
and she was so tired what with the dis-
appointment and all, we stopped to rest.
And it kind of come over us that here
we 'd had all that walk for nothin', and
notellin' when it could come off, for they
said Elder Tyler might stop over to
visit a spell; and here we wa'n't mar-
ried after all, and all that stuff cooked
up, and the folks invited, to say nothin'
of a grass stain on Miny's dress, which
could n't never be bran span new again.
'T wa'n't any wonder she could n't help
but cry, and though she wa'n't blamin'
me, you know how it is, Squire, when
a woman cries, — a man feels as if he
was all to blame. We was both wish-
in' we 'd let Lawyer Clark have the
job in spite of the lawsuit. Then you
come. You looked so kind of human
settin' there eatin' young iv'ries that
I says to Miny, says I, ' That 's our
chance. He 's a lawyer on his way to
court, which sets to-morrow,' says I."
He drew a folded paper from his pocket.
" Will you marry us, Squire ? "
The Judge considered, running his
eyes over the document, which assured
him that no impediment existed to a
union between John Strong and Elmina
Foster.
"The lack of witnesses seems to be
the only objection," he said.
The bridegroom's face fell. " I
forgot that," he said. "Tom Hicks
and Luella Savage went with us, but
when they found it wa'n't comin' off
they did n't feel like wastin' the whole
afternoon, so they went off pleasurin' on
their own account with peanuts and
lemonade for treat. Well, that spoils
it all, and I guess we might 's well give
up for this time."
Elmina put away her handkerchief,
smoothed down her dress, and adjusted
the lace ties of her bonnet. "Nimrod
Weston and his brother was pullin'
stumps in the next field when we come
down," she suggested shyly.
They walked along the smooth wood-
land road, the Judge following the pair
with the bay horse's bridle across his
arm.
"It won't be a religious weddin',
after all, " John Strong suggested doubt-
fully. "You 're sure you ain't goin' to
mind that when it 's too late, Miny? "
Miny cast an appealing look toward
the Judge. "You don't ever make a
prayer when you — marry folks — do
you ? " she asked.
Judge Preston hesitated; the legal
world would not have called him a
The Judge.
695
praying man, and the substantial check
he gave each year to the support of
a city church was believed to throw
all burden of his spiritual development
upon his pastor. Still, he reflected, he
had never yet joined two undying souls
in the bonds of matrimony without
feeling himself an humble instrument
in the hands of the Almighty. "We '11
see," he said whimsically. "Out here
in the Temple of Nature it may be the
Creator is near enough to hear even a
lawyer's prayer." He stopped in the
road a moment later, as vigorous shouts
indicated that the witnesses they sought
were near at hand. Habitual reserve
suddenly overcame Judge Preston.
"We need not detain your neighbors
from their work for that part of it,"
he explained. " Let us have the prayer
first.
"0 Lord, "he prayed, standing bare-
headed in the shadow of an aged pine
tree, "bless this couple waiting now
before thy judgment seat. May they
live their earthly life in unselfish de-
votion one to the other, training their
descendants to righteous living and good
citizenship, at peace with their neigh-
bors, and in fear of Thee. Let the union
about to be consummated be not for
time, but for eternity. Amen."
The Weston brothers cheerfully left
their ropes and oxen to lean blackened
hands upon the stone wall. Nimrod's
admiring eyes were fixed upon Elmina's
face as she stood by the roadside beneath
a wild cherry tree in full bloom, but
the brother, with increasing respect,
studied Judge Preston's face. It was
not until the ceremony was over, and the
Judge, having received the proffered fee
only to slip it into the bride's hand
with a gold piece from his own pocket,
had ridden on his way, that the elder
Weston turned to the newly married
pair.
"You 're a modest couple, you
two," he said derisively. "The best
ain't none too good for yer. That was
Judge Preston, that was. I saw him
oncet when I was workin' in a saw mill
down to Bangor, and a feller that got
killed sued for damages, — leastways
his folks did, — and I '11 stump any
man that 's seen Judge Preston oncet
not to know him again."
John Strong looked after the cloud
of dust with crestfallen face. " I guess
he thinks we 're cheeky," he said.
Elmina serenely polished the gold
piece with her handkerchief. "There
has n't any of the girls I know ever
been married by a judge," she said
with satisfaction. "And nobody can
say it was n't a religious weddin',
either, for there is n't a minister in
Somerset County could have made a
better prayer."
The Judge rode on. Long afternoon
shadows were beginning to rest upon the
landscape, bringing the traveler plea-
sant reminder that the end of his jour-
ney was near at hand. His wandering
attention fixed itself again upon mat-
ters professional, as he wondered just
what work awaited him in the old court-
house across the river where he had tried
and won his first case. The bay horse
shied suddenly, and the Judge looked
down at a small boy industriously dig-
ging by the wayside. "Dandelion
greens, " he remarked with inspired re-
collection. "I believe I should like
some for supper."
Ten cents for the greens and twenty-
five for the pail which held them effect-
ed a purchase, and a little later the law-
yers of the county, who had already
arrived at the Norridgewock Hotel,
stared in amazement as the travel-
stained Judge rode up to the door, bear-
ing his supper upon the saddle before
him.
"You needn't have brought provi-
sions, " the offended landlady remarked.
"There 's stewed chicken and pound
cake for supper, and roasts in plenty for
to-morrow. "
The Judge looked penitent. " Mad-
am," he said, "the fame of your house
696
The Judge.
is too widespread to allow a doubt of
its abundance. But I have n't tasted
dandelion greens for twenty years."
It was, perhaps, a fortunate circum-
stance for Judge Preston that the first
cases brought before him were suits
which included some intricate problems
of legal rights and demanded his close
attention, for he found himself, even
while losing no word of testimony or
plea, absently assigning the jury to va-
rious families of the region. And the
prosecuting attorney conceived a life-
long prejudice when the Judge smiled
broadly in the midst of his most elo-
quent plea, never dreaming that the
smile was occasioned by the memory of
a practical joke which the "boys " of
Bloomfield had once played upon the
maternal grandfather of the jury's fore-
man.
When the first criminal trial began,
the Judge awoke from absent-minded
retrospection to vivid interest in the
proceedings. His keen eyes missed no
varying expression upon the face of wit-
ness or attorney, and the prisoner, a
young man of twenty, became the object
of his thoughtful scrutiny. More than
once he interrupted a witness with an
irrelevant personal inquiry as to his an-
cestry or family connection.
The prisoner, on the testimony of two
eyewitnesses, was easily proved guilty
of repeated thefts from a neighbor's
granary ; his attorney made a weak and
faltering defense, which did as much to
convict his client as the opposing law-
yer's triumphant prosecution.
Judge Preston arose to give his
charge to the jury, his eyes resting
thoughtfully upon the prisoner. " Young
man," he asked, "was n't your father
Ezekiel Meecham who married Maria
Comstock? "
The prisoner nodded sullenly.
"Gentlemen of the jury," contin-
ued the Judge, "you know the prisoner's
ancestry. You know the Comstocks
were honest enough, but too shiftless to
cook the food the neighbors gave them,
and you know that the Meechams as a
family possessed an unusual and most
singular combination of qualities which
would lead them to steal anything they
could get their hands on, while at the
same time they would n't tell a lie to
save their lives."
The audience looked interested.
There were emphatic nods of agree-
ment throughout the room. The Judge
turned to the prisoner.
"Young man," he said again, "you
have pleaded not guilty as a legal tech-
nicality and by advice of your counsel.
Now tell me the truth. Did you com-
mit these thefts, or did you not ? "
The prisoner hesitated. "I took some
popcorn — once, " he admitted, with an
anxiou sglancetowardhis counsel . "We
was havin' a bonfire on the Island, and
't was too fur to go home. But I never
went again, nor took another thing, I
don't care what they say."
"I believe you," replied Judge Pres-
ton, adding, as the boy took his seat,
"Of course, gentlemen of the jury, I
do not advise you to acquit the prisoner
of later charges upon his own testimony.
Neither do I expect that you will con-
vict him on the testimony we have heard,
without taking into consideration the
well-known fact that Charles M. Fin-
ley's grandfather was a great man to
jump at conclusions, and the Gateses as
a family were so near of sight that they
could n't be depended upon to tell a
colt from a calf at ten rods' distance
in broad daylight, not to mention moon-
light. The charge against the prisoner
is for breaking and entering, which of-
fense he has by his own confession once
committed. It is your manifest duty
to find him guilty, remembering, while
you do not countenance the practice,
that the boys of Somerset County have
been accustomed to make free with
their neighbors' popcorn and sweet ap-
ples from the time we ourselves were
boys."
Fifteen minutes later the foreman of
the jury arose to give the verdict. "We
The Judge.
697
find the prisoner guilty of the popcorn
just as he says, " he announced, "but
not of the oats and corn that was missed
afterwards. We figure that a family
that never owned a hoss would n't have
no use for oats, and the Judge's charge
was n't necessary to remind us that no
descendant of the Comstocks was n't
likely to steal corn which had got to be
shelled."
The Judge beamed with approval
upon the jury, then addressed himself
to the audience.
"I suppose you are all thinking,"
he said slowly, "that there isn't much
hope for a young man made up of Corn-
stock and Meecham in equal parts, and
he might as well be in jail where he
can't steal as out of jail where he 's li-
able to. You may be right. But you
will remember, as I do, that Ezekiel
Meecham 's maternal gtandfather was
an honorable and God-fearing man, and
as I have watched the prisoner these
last two days his resemblance to that
ancestor has grown upon me. I believe
there 's the making of a good citizen
in him, and the state can't afford to lose
it by fixing the jail-mark upon him at
his age. Therefore, instead of senten-
cing him to a term of imprisonment, I
condemn him to pay one hundred dol-
lars fine and the costs of this trial, and
to be committed to jail until such fine
is paid."
"It practically amounts to imprison-
ment for life," the sheriff declared,
lingering in the room after court ad-
journed for the day. "No Meecham
livin' ever saw a hundred dollars all to
once." But the Judge, standing erect
and dignified by the clerk's desk, was
counting crisp bills from a well-filled
pocketbook.
"I have paid your fine, " he explained
a moment later to the embarrassed but
grateful prisoner. "One hundred and
thirty-eight dollars in all. You can
repay me at your leisure."
Ruel Meecham flushed angrily at the
laugh which arose. "I hope to die if
I don't pay it," he declared. "You
fellows just wait and see."
There was no lack of dignity upon
Judge Preston's part as he sat in the
judicial seat listening to the last case
of the term. The fragrance of lilacs
and early roses floated through the open
window, and the blue river, only a few
yards distant, was filled with a surging
mass of brown logs, which indicated that
" the drive " had reached Norridgewock.
But neither beauty of nature nor the
skillful gymnastics of red-shirted river
drivers had power to distract the Judge's
attention from his work. The court-
room was crowded, for the case of Deb-
orah B. Gilman against Lysander R.
Gilman had attracted wide attention,
and the sympathy of the whole county
round about was divided between the
nervous little woman suing for divorce,
after a quarter century of married life,
and the bluff, hard-handed farmer who
admitted in aggrieved tone that he
shared his wife's desire for separation,
but "did n't want it made to look as
if he was the only one to blame."
It was an old story. Judge Preston
in his legal career had heard it many
times before. An overworked, colorless
life for the woman, ending in irritated
nerves and fretful complaining, which
aroused the man to indignant retalia-
tion. "Incompatibility of tempera-
ment " was the plea advanced by the
youthful attorney of the wife. The
jury had been dismissed, and their places
were crowded with interested spectators.
The wife's relatives upon one side of
the room glared at the husband's fam-
ily connections upon the other. Judge
Preston listened without question or
comment to long examinations and cross-
examinations of neighbors, relatives,
and friends. Deborah Gilman, it ap-
peared from the testimony her counsel
introduced, had turned her dresses and
re-trimmed her bonnets, growing shab-
bier each year ; had discontinued neigh-
borly visits because " the team " was
always needed for farm work ; had
698
The Judge.
cheerfully donated butter and egg
money to the purchase of new farming-
tools, and performed her housework all
"by hand," while her husband rejoiced
in labor-saving implements for out-of-
door work. The principal witness in
her behalf was the hired man, a loqua-
cious individual, with oiled hair and a
red necktie.
" I never see a woman have a harder
time," Seth Jackson declared. "He
wa'n't never willin' for her to go no-
where nor have no thin '. " When pressed
for more specific information Seth's tes-
timony was largely interspersed with "I
told hers " and "said she to mes."
Lysander Oilman sat with crimson
face, and eyes fixed upon the floor, dur-
ing the long recital of his wife's wrongs.
The plaintiff sobbed hysterically. " It '&
worse 'n I thought come to tell it out
in court," she declared.
When the defense opened Lysander
Oilman drew a long breath of relief,
and as it proceeded his head became
more erect. "Lysander never had new
clothes, neither," a neighbor declared.
"Lots of times he coaxed her to go to
the Grange, and she would n't, because
she 'd rather stay to home and hook
rugs. She was hookin' from mornin'
till night when she could get a minute,
and a good part of the egg money she
spent for colorin' stuff. All the money
they saved was put in the bank in her
name. Mebbe they ain't lived very
peaceful together, but Deborah 's just
as much to blame as Lysander."
Judge Preston offered no comment
when, as principal witness for the de-
fense, Seth Jackson was called. Seth,
bent upon doing his full duty in every
relation of life, made quite as strong
a witness for the defendant's cause as
he had for the plaintiff.
"She never give him a pleasant
word from mornin' till night," he as-
serted. "Naggin' and twittin', which
is worse 'n downright scoldin'. Many 's
the time I 've said to him, 'I would n't
stand it,' says I."
The late afternoon sun streamed
through elm branches into the dusty
courtroom as, testimony and pleas con-
cluded, Judge Preston rose in his place.
"You may have shown," he said
addressing the two counsel, " abundant
reason why the law should grant divorce
to the two petitioners now before this
tribunal. But it is an impossible peti-
tion for this Court to grant. I married
this couple myself down in Bloomfield
just twenty-five years ago. I married
them good and strong in the fear of the
Lord, and in the presence of two relia-
ble witnesses, both of whom are here
present to-day. I did n't marry them
for a quarter of a century, or a half of
a century, but for whatsoever time of
mortal life should be given, until death
did them part. What God and Eben-
ezer Preston have joined together, Eb-
enezer Preston, alone and single-hand-
ed, is n't going to put asunder.
"Lysander Oilman and Deborah Gil-
man stand up, " the Judge demanded.
The two rose uncertainly in their
places ; neither looked toward the
other. "Join hands," the Judge con-
tinued sternly. There was a moment's
hesitation, then the two came nearer
together, and Deborah's thin fingers
slipped nervously into Lysander 's sun-
burned palm. "I sentence you both,"
declared the Judge, "to go back to
your home and live the remainder of
your lives in peace and affection one
towards the other. Lysander, as you
go through Bloomfield village, you stop
and buy your wife a white bonnet with
pink roses. It may not be the height
of fashion for women of her age to-day,
but it 's what she needs. And then you
buy a pound of peppermints such as you
had in your pocket on your wedding
day, and you two eat every one of them
on the way out home. Deborah, you go
home and make hot biscuit for supper,
and to-morrow morning you put away
that rug-hook forevermore. Hereafter,
when your housework is done, and
there 's nowhere to go, you sit out un-
Fishing with a Worm.
699
der the trees and read, or work in the
flower-garden. But, first of all, and
before you leave this room, Lysander,
you discharge that hired man."
The Judge rode down the valley next
morning in the same humility of spirit
in which he had come. His eyes rested
thoughtfully on the low windows of his
first office as he passed swiftly through
his native town.
"They think that earthly prominence
means increase of power, " he mused.
" But I have lived to learn that it means
only increased responsibility. Well,
Hiram Jennings has finished that wood-
pile. I wonder which of us finds the
greater satisfaction in the completion
of his task. I should n't wonder if it
were he — that wood is well worked
up."
Harriet A. Nash.
FISHING WITH A WORM.
" The last fish I caught was with a worm."
— IZAAK WALTON.
A DEFECTIVE logic is the born fisher-
man's portion. He is a pattern of in-
consistency. He does the things which
he ought not to do, and he leaves undone
the things which other people think he
ought to do. He observes the wind
when he should be sowing, and he re-
gards the clouds, with temptation tug-
ging familiarly at his heartstrings, when
he might be grasping the useful sickle.
It is a wonder that there is so much
health in him. A sorrowing political
economist remarked to me in early boy-
hood, as a jolly red-bearded neighbor,
followed by an abnormally fat dog,
sauntered past us for his nooning :
" That man is the best carpenter in
town, but he will leave the most impor-
tant job whenever he wants to go fish-
ing." I stared at the sinful carpenter,
who swung along leisurely in the May
sunshine, keeping just ahead of his dog.
To leave one's job in order to go fishing !
How illogical !
Years bring the reconciling mind.
The world grows big enough to include
within its scheme both the instructive
political economist and the truant me-
chanic. But that trick of truly logical
behavior seems harder to the man than
to the child. For example, I climbed
up to my den under the eaves last night
— a sour, black sea-fog lying all about,
and the December sleet crackling against
the window-panes — in order to varnish
a certain fly-rod. Now rods ought to be
put in order in September, when the
fishing closes, or else in April, when it
opens. To varnish a rod in December
proves that one possesses either a dila-
tory or a childishly anticipatory mind.
But before uncorking the varnish bottle,
it occurred to me to examine a dog-
eared, water-stained fly-book, to guard
against the ravages of possible moths.
This interlude proved fatal to the var-
nishing. A half hour went happily by
in rearranging the flies. Then, with a
fisherman's lack of sequence, as I picked
out here and there a plain snell-hook
from the gaudy feathered ones, I said
to myself with a generous glow at the
heart : " Fly-fishing has had enough sa-
cred poets celebrating it already. Is n't
there a good deal to be said, after all,
for fishing with a worm ? "
Could there be a more illogical pro-
ceeding ? And here follows the trea-
tise, — a Defense of Results, an Apology
for Opportunism, — conceived in agree-
able procrastination, devoted to the
praise of the inconsequential angleworm,
and dedicated to a childish memory of a
whistling carpenter and his fat dog.
700
Fishing with a Worm.
Let us face the worst at the very be-
ginning. It shall be a shameless exam-
ple of fishing under conditions that make
the fly a mockery. Take the Taylor
Brook, " between the roads," on the
headwaters of the Lamoille. The place
is a jungle. The swamp maples and
cedars were felled a generation ago, and
the tops were trimmed into the brook.
The alders and moosewood are higher
than your head ; on every tiny knoll the
fir balsams have gained a footing, and
creep down, impenetrable, to the edge of
the water. In the open spaces the Joe-
Pye weed swarms. In two minutes after
leaving the upper road you have scared
a mink or a rabbit, and you have prob-
ably lost the brook. Listen ! It is only
a gurgle here, droning along, smooth
and dark, under the tangle of cedar-tops
and the shadow of the balsams. Fol-
low the sound cautiously. There, be-
yond the Joe-Pye weed, and between the
stump and the cedar-top, is a hand's-
breadth of black water. Fly-casting is
impossible in this maze of dead and liv-
ing branches. Shorten your line to two
feet, or even less, bait your hook with a
worm, and drop it gingerly into that
gurgling crevice of water. Before it
has sunk six inches, if there is not one
of those black-backed, orange-bellied,
Taylor Brook trout fighting with it,
something is wrong with your worm or
with you. For the trout are always
there, sheltered by the brushwood that
makes this half mile of fishing "not
worth while." Below the lower road
the Taylor Brook becomes uncertain
water. For half a mile it yields only
fingerlings, for no explainable reason ;
then there are two miles of clean fishing
through the deep woods, where the
branches are so high that you can cast
a fly again if you like, and there are
long pools, where now and then a heavy
fish will rise ; then comes a final half
mile through the alders, where you must
wade, knee to waist deep, before you
come to the bridge and the river. Glo-
rious fishing is sometimes to be had
here, — especially if you work down the
gorge at twilight, casting a white miller
until it is too dark to see. But alas,
there is a well-worn path along the
brook, and often enough there are the
very footprints of the " fellow ahead of
you," signs as disheartening to the fish-
erman as ever were the footprints on
the sand to Robinson Crusoe.
But " between the roads " it is " too
much trouble to fish ; " and there lies
the salvation of the humble fisherman
who disdains not to use the crawling
worm, nor, for that matter, to crawl him-
self, if need be, in order to sneak under
the boughs of some overhanging cedar
that casts a perpetual shadow upon the
sleepy brook. Lying here at full length,
with no elbow-room to manage the rod,
you must occasionally even unjoint your
tip, and fish with that, using but a dozen
inches of line, and not letting so much as
your eyebrows show above the bank.
Is it a becoming attitude for a middle-
aged citizen of the world ? That de-
pends upon how the fish are biting.
Holing a put looks rather ridiculous also,
to the mere observer, but it requires,
like brook-fishing with a tip only, a very
delicate wrist, perfect tactile sense, and
a fine disregard of appearances.
There are some fishermen who always
fish as if they were being photographed.
The Taylor Brook " between the roads "
is not for them. To fish it at all is back-
breaking, trouser-tearing work ; to see it
thoroughly fished is to learn new lessons
in the art of angling. To watch R., for ex-
ample, steadily filling his six-pound creel
from that unlikely stream is like watching
Sargent paint a portrait. R. weighs two
hundred and ten. Twenty years ago he
was a famous amateur pitcher, and among
his present avocations are violin playing,
which is good for the wrist, taxidermy,
which is good for the eye, and shooting
woodcock, which before the days of the
new Nature Study used to be thought
good for the whole man. R. began as a
Fishing with a Worm.
701
fly-fisherman, but by dint of passing his
summers near brooks where fly-fishing is
impossible, he has become a stout-hearted
apologist for the worm. His apparatus
is most singular. It consists of a very
long, cheap rod, stout enough to smash
through bushes, and with the stiffest tip
obtainable. The lower end of the butt,
below the reel, fits into the socket of a
huge extra butt of bamboo, which R.
carries unconcernedly. To reach a dis-
tant hole, or to fish the lower end of a
ripple, R. simply locks his reel, slips on
the extra butt, and there is a fourteen-
foot rod ready for action. He fishes with
a line unbelievably short, and a Kendal
hook far too big ; and when a trout jumps
for that hook, R. wastes no time in ma-
noeuvring for position. The unlucky fish
is simply " derricked," — to borrow a
word from Theodore, most saturnine and
profane of Moosehead guides.
" Shall I play him awhile ? " shouted
an excited sportsman to Theodore, after
hooking his first big trout.
" no ! " growled Theodore in dis-
gust. "Just derrick him right into the
canoe ! " A heroic method, surely ;
though it once cost me the best square-
tail I ever hooked, for Theodore had
forgotten the landing-net, and the gut
broke in his fingers as he tried to swing
the fish aboard. But with these lively
quarter-pounders of the Taylor Brook,
derricking is a safer procedure. Indeed,
I have sat dejectedly on the far end of a
log, after fishing the hole under it in
vain, and seen the mighty R. wade down-
stream close behind me, adjust that com-
ical extra butt, and jerk a couple of half-
pound trout from under the very log on
which I was sitting. His device on
this occasion, as I well remember, was
to pass his hook but once through the
middle of a big worm, let the worm sink
to the bottom, and crawl along it at his
leisure. The trout could not resist.
Once, and once only, have I come
near equaling R.'s record, and the way
he beat me then is the justification for a
whole philosophy of worm-fishing. We
were on this very Taylor Brook, and at
five in the afternoon both baskets were
two thirds full. By count I had just one
more fish than he. It was raining hard.
" You fish down through the alders,"
said R. magnanimously. "I '11 cut across
and wait for you at the saw mill. I
don't want to get any wetter, on account
of my rheumatism."
This was rather barefaced kindness,
— for whose rheumatism was ever the
worse for another hour's fishing ? But
I weakly accepted it. I coveted three
or four good trout to top off with, —
that was all. So I tied on a couple of
flies, and began to fish the alders, wad-
ing waist deep in the rapidly rising wa-
ter, down the long green tunnel under
the curving boughs. The brook fairly
smoked with the rain, by this time, but
when did one fail to get at least three or
four trout out of this best half mile of
the lower brook ? Yet I had no luck.
I tried one fly after another, and then,
as a forlorn hope, — though it sometimes
has a magic of its own, — I combined a
brown hackle for the tail fly with a twist-
ing worm on the dropper. Not a rise !
I thought of R. sitting patiently in the
saw mill, and I fished more conscientious-
ly than ever.
Venture as warily, use the same skill,
Do your best, whether winning or losing it,
If you choose to play ! — is my principle.
Even those lines, which by some subtle
telepathy of the trout brook murmur
themselves over and over to me in the
waning hours of an unlucky day, brought
now no consolation. There was simply
not one fish to be had, to any fly in the
book, out of that long, drenching, dark-
ening tunnel. At last I climbed out of
the brook, by the bridge. R. was sit-
ting on the fence, his neck and ears care-
fully turtled under his coat collar, the
smoke rising and the rain dripping from
the inverted bowl of his pipe. He did
not seem to be worrying about his rheu-
matism.
702
Fishing with a Woiin.
«' What luck ? " he asked.
" None at all," I answered morosely.
" Sorry to keep you waiting."
" That 's all right," remarked R.
" What do you think I 've been doing ?
I've been fishing out of the saw-mill
window just to kill time. There was a
patch of floating sawdust there, — kind
of unlikely place for»trout, anyway, — but
I thought I 'd put on a worm and let him
crawl around a little." He opened his
creel as he spoke.
" But I did n't look for a pair of 'em,"
he added. And there, on top of his small-
er fish, were as pretty a pair of three-
quarter-pound brook trout as were ever
basketed.
" I 'm afraid you got pretty wet," said
E. kindly.
"I don't mind that," I replied. And
I did n't. What I minded was the
thought of an hour's vain wading in that
roaring stream, whipping it with fly
after fly, while R., the fore-ordained
fisherman, was sitting comfortably in a
saw mill, and derricking that pair of
three-quarter-pounders in through the
window ! I had ventured more warily
than he, and used, if not the same skill,
at least the best skill at my command.
My conscience was clear, but so was his ;
and he had had the drier skin and the
greater magnanimity and the biggest
fish besides. There is much to be said,
in a world like ours, for taking the world
as you find it and for fishing with a
worm.
One's memories of such fishing, how-
ever agreeable they may be, are not to
be identified with a defense of the prac-
tice. Yet, after all, the most effective
defense of worm-fishing is the concrete
recollection of some brook that could be
fished best or only in that way, or the
image of a particular trout that yielded
to the temptation of an angleworm af-
ter you had flicked fly after fly over him
in vain. Indeed, half the zest of brook
fishing is in your campaign for " indi-
viduals," — as the Salvation Army work-
ers say, — not merely for a basketful of
fish qua fish, but for a series of individ-
ual trout which your instinct tells you
ought to lurk under that log or be hov-
ering in that ripple. How to get him,
by some sportsmanlike process, is the
question. If he will rise to some fly in
your book, few fishermen will deny that
the fly is the more pleasurable weapon.
Dainty, luring, beautiful toy, light as
thistle-down, falling where you will it to
fall, holding when the leader tightens
and sings like the string of a violin, the
artificial fly represents the poetry of an-
gling. Given the gleam of early morn-
ing on some wide water, a heavy trout
breaking the surface as he curves and
plunges, with the fly holding well, with
the right sort of rod in your fingers, and
the right man in the other end of the
canoe, and you perceive how easy is
that Emersonian trick of making the
pomp of emperors ridiculous.
But angling's honest prose, as repre-
sented by the lowly worm, has also its
exalted moments. " The last fish I
caught was with a worm," says the hon-
est Walton, and so say I. It was the
last evening of last August. The dusk
was settling deep upon a tiny meadow,
scarcely ten rods from end to end. The
rank bog grass, already drenched with
dew, bent over the narrow, deep little
brook so closely that it could not be
fished except with a double - shotted,
baited hook, dropped delicately between
the heads of the long grasses. Under-
neath this canopy the trout were feeding,
taking the hook with a straight down-
ward tug, as they made for the hidden
bank. It was already twilight when I
began, and before I reached the black
belt of woods that separated the meadow
from the lake, the swift darkness of the
North Country made it impossible to see
the hook. A short half hour's fishing
only, and behold nearly twenty good
trout derricked into a basket until then
sadly empty. Your rigorous fly-fisher-
Fishing with a Worm.
703
man would have passed that grass-hid-
den brook in disdain, but it proved a
treasure for the humble.
Here, indeed, there was no question
of individually minded fish, but simply
a neglected brook, full of trout which
could be reached with the baited hook
only. In more open brook-fishing it is
always a fascinating problem to decide
how to fish a favorite pool or ripple, for
much depends upon the hour of the day,
the light, the height of water, the precise
period of the spring or summer. But
after one has decided upon the best theo-
retical procedure, how often the stupid
trout prefers some other plan ! And
when you have missed a fish that you
counted upon landing, what solid satis-
faction is still possible for you, if you
are philosopher enough to sit down then
and there, eat your lunch, smoke a medi-
tative pipe, and devise a new campaign
against that particular fish! To get
another rise from him after lunch is a
triumph of diplomacy; to land him is
nothing short of statesmanship. For
sometimes he will jump furiously at a
fly, for very devilishness, without ever
meaning to take it, and then, wearying
suddenly of his gymnastics, he will
snatch sulkily at a grasshopper, beetle,
or worm. Trout feed upon an extraor-
dinary variety of crawling things, as all
fishermen know who practice the useful
habit of opening the first two or three
fish they catch, to see what food is that
day the favorite. But here, as elsewhere
in this world, the best things lie nearest,
and there is no bait so killing, week in
and week out, as your plain garden or
golf-green angleworm.
Walton's list of possible worms is im-
pressive, and his directions for placing
them upon the hook have the placid
completeness that belonged to his char-
acter. Yet in such matters a little non-
conformity may be encouraged. No two
men or boys dig bait in quite the same
way, though all share, no doubt, the
singular elation which gilds that grimy
occupation with the spirit of romance.
The mind is really occupied, not with
the wriggling red creatures in the lumps
of earth, but with the stout fish which
each worm may capture, just as a saint
might rejoice in the squalor of this world
as a preparation for the glories of the
world to come. Nor do any two expe-
rienced fishermen hold quite the same
theory as to the best mode of baiting the
hook. There are a hundred ways, each
of them good. As to the best hook for
worm-fishing, you will find dicta in every
catalogue of fishing tackle, but size and
shape and tempering are qualities that
should vary with the brook, the season,
and the fisherman. Should one use a
three-foot leader, or none at all ? Whose
rods are best for bait-fishing, granted
that all of them should be stiff enough in
the tip to lift a good fish by dead strain
from a tangle of brush or logs ? Such
questions, like those pertaining to the
boots or coat which one should wear, the
style of bait-box one should carry, or the
brand of tobacco best suited for smoking
in the wind, are topics for unending dis-
cussion among the serious minded around
the camp-fire. Much edification is in
them, and yet they are but prudential
maxims after all. They are mere mo-
ralities of the Franklin or Chesterfield
variety, counsels of worldly wisdom, but
they leave the soul untouched. A man
may have them at his fingers' ends and
be no better fisherman at bottom ; or he
may, like R., ignore most of the admit-
ted rules and come home with a full
basket. It is a sufficient defense of
fishing with a worm to pronounce the
truism that no man is a complete angler
until he has mastered all the modes of
angling. Lovely streams, lonely and
enticing, but impossible to fish with a
fly, await the fisherman who is not too
proud to use, with a man's skill, the
same unpretentious tackle which he be-
gan with as a boy.
But ah, to fish with a worm, and then
704
Fishing with a Worm,
not catch your fish ! To fail with a fly
is no disgrace : your art may have been
impeccable, your patience faultless to the
end. But the philosophy of worm-fish-
ing is that of Results, of having some-
thing tangible in your basket when the
day's work is done. It is a plea for
Compromise, for cutting the coat accord-
ing to the cloth, for taking the world as
it actually is. The fly-fisherman is a
natural Foe of Compromise. He throws
to the trout a certain kind of lure ; an
they will take it, so ; if not, adieu. He
knows no middle path.
This high man, aiming at a million,
Misses an unit.
The raptures and the tragedies of
consistency are his. He is a scorner of
the ground. All honor to him ! When
he comes back at nightfall and says
happily, " I have never cast a line more
perfectly than I have to-day," it is al-
most indecent to peek into his creel. It
is like rating Colonel Newcome by his
bank account.
But the worm-fisherman is no such
proud and isolated soul. He is a " low
man " rather than a high one ; he hon-
estly cares what his friends will think
when they look into his basket to see
what he has to show for his day's sport.
He watches the Foe of Compromise men
go stumbling forward and superbly fall-
ing, while he, with less inflexible cour-
age, manages to keep his feet. He
wants to score, and not merely to give a
pretty exhibition of base-running. At
the Harvard-Yale football game of 1903
the Harvard team showed superior
strength in rushing the ball ; they car-
ried it almost to the Yale goal line re-
peatedly, but they could not, for some
reason, take it over. In the instant of
absolute need, the Yale line held, and
when the Yale team had to score in order
to win, they scored. As the crowd
streamed out of the Stadium, a veteran
Harvard alumnus said : " This news will
cause great sorrow in one home I know
of, until they learn by to-morrow's papers
that the Harvard team acquitted itself
creditably." Exactly. Given one team
bent upon acquitting itself creditably,
and another team determined to win,
which will be victorious ? The stay-at-
homes on the Yale campus that day were
not curious to know whether their team
was acquitting itself creditably, but
whether it was winning the game.
Every other question than that was to
those young Philistines merely a fine-
spun irrelevance. They took the Cash
and let the Credit go.
There is much to be said, no doubt,
for the Harvard veteran's point of view.
The proper kind of credit may be a bet-
ter asset for eleven boys than any cham-
pionship ; and to fish a bit of water
consistently and skillfully, with your best
flies and in your best manner, is perhaps
achievement enough. So says the Foe
of Compromise, at least. But the Yale
spirit will be prying into the basket in
search of fish ; it prefers concrete results.
If all men are by nature either Platonists
or Aristotelians, fly-fishermen or worm-
fishermen, how difficult it is for us to do
one another justice ! Differing in mind,
in aim and method, how shall we say
infallibly that this man or that is wrong ?
To fail with Plato for companion may
be better than to succeed with Aristotle.
But one thing is perfectly clear : there
is no warrant for Compromise but in
Success. Use a worm if you will, but
you must have fish to show for it, if you
would escape the finger of scorn. If
you find yourself camping by an unknown
brook, and are deputed to catch the ne-
cessary trout for breakfast, it is wiser to
choose the surest bait. The crackle of
the fish in the frying-pan will atone for
any theoretical defect in your method.
But to choose the surest bait, and then
to bring back no fish, is unforgivable.
Forsake Plato if you must, — but you
may do so only at the price of justifying
yourself in the terms of Aristotelian
arithmetic. The college president who
abandoned his college in order to run a
Fishing with a Worm.
705
cotton mill was free to make his own
choice of a calling ; but he was never
pardoned for bankrupting the mill. If
one is bound to be a low man rather than
an impractical idealist, he should at least
make sure of his vulgar success.
Is all this but a disguised defense of
pot-hunting? No. There is no possible
defense of pot-hunting, whether it be
upon a trout brook or in the stock market.
Against fish or men, one should play the
game fairly. Yet for that matter some
of the most skillful fly-fishermen I have
known were pot-hunters at heart, and
some of the most prosaic - looking mer-
chants were idealists compared to whom
Shelley was but a dreaming boy. All
depends upon the spirit with which one
makes his venture. I recall a boy of five
who gravely watched his father tramp
off after rabbits, — gun on shoulder and
beagle in leash. Thereupon he shoul-
dered a wooden sword, and dragging his
reluctant black kitten by a string, sallied
forth upon the dusty Vermont road " to
get a lion for breakfast." That is the
true sporting temper ! Let there be but
a fine idealism in the quest, and the par-
ticular object is unessential. " A true
fisherman's happiness," says Mr. Cleve-
land, " is not dependent upon his luck."
It depends upon his heart.
No doubt all amateur fishing is but
" play," — as the psychologists soberly
term it: not a necessary, but a freely
assumed activity, born of surplusage of
vitality. Nobody, not even a carpen-
ter wearied of his job, has to go fish-
ing unless he wants to. He may indeed
find himself breakfastless in camp, and
obliged to betake himself to the brook, —
but then he need not have gone into the
woods at all. Yet if he does decide to
fish, let him
Venture as warily, use the same skill,
Do his best, . . .
whatever variety of tackle he may choose.
He can be a whole-souled sportsman
VOL. xcni. — NO. 559.
45
with the poorest equipment, or a mean
" trout-hog " with the most elaborate.
Only, in the name of gentle Izaak
himself, let him be a complete angler;
and let the man be a passionate amateur
of all the arts of life, despising none of
them, and using all of them for his soul's
good and for the joy of his fellows. If
he be, so to speak, but a worm-fisher-
man, — a follower of humble occupa-
tions, and pledged to unromantic duties,
— let him still thrill with the pleasures
of the true sportsman. To make the
most of dull hours, to make the best of
dull people, to like a poor jest better
than none, to wear the threadbare coat
like a gentleman, to be outvoted with a
smile, to hitch your wagon to the old
horse if no star is handy, — this is the
wholesome philosophy taught by fishing
with a worm. The fun of it depends
upon the heart. There may be as much
zest in saving as in spending, in working
for small wages as for great, in avoiding
the snap-shots of publicity as in being
invariably first " among those present."
But a man should be honest. If he
catches most of his fish with a worm,
secures the larger portion of his success
by commonplace industry, let him glory
in it, for this, too, is part of the great
game. Yet he ought not in that case to
pose as a fly-fisherman only, — to carry
himself as one aware of the immortaliz-
ing camera, — to pretend that life is easy,
if one but knows how to drop a fly into
the right ripple. For life is not easy,
after all is said. It is a long brook to
fish, and it needs a stout heart and a
wise patience. All the flies there are in
the book, and all the bait that can be
carried in the box, are likely to be
needed ere the day is over. But, like
the Psalmist's " river of God," this brook
is " full of water," and there is plenty
of good fishing to be had in it if one is
neither afraid nor ashamed of fishing
sometimes with a worm.
Bliss Perry.
706 Paul Lenthier's Feeshin '-Pole.
PAUL LENTHIER'S FEESHIN'-POLE.
ALL his neighbors grew richer than
Old Paul Lenthier, trout-fisherman.
Yet what man in the settlement
Possessed his soul in more content?
Those days he paddled to some clear pool
Where trout lay deep in waters cool,
Those days he sat with pole and line
Drinking the air that was like good wine,
Watching the duck-brood learn to dive,
Glad like them to be there and alive.
He sang, and taught little Jeanne to fish,
To go with him was Jeanne's first wish ; —
" Rich Joe Bruseau he make charcoal,
On de lake he cannot go ; —
We, Jeanne, have only de feeshin'-pole,
But we *re richer dan rich Joe ! "
Jeanne grew fair as that white birch there,
Bruseau's Marie and she were a pair;
But Bruseau's Marie had money to buy
Finery for a French girl's eye ;
Jeanne almost cried her bright eyes out,
" Dere comes no money from feeshin' trout ! "
Paul heard, and sadly stole away
To fish alone the whole of a day ;
That night he hung up his pole and net
Slowly, with just a sigh of regret;
Then whistled as gay as blackbirds can
And bargained to be Joe Bruseau's man,
Vowing so stoutly that he was fit,
Joe gave him work in the charcoal pit.
And now Jeanne laughs, she 's covered o'er
With ribbons from the notion-store ;
Old Paul laughs too, through dust of the coal, —
And tries to forget his fishing-pole.
But in the bays, spruce-darkened, dim,
The splashing duck-brood watch for him :
" Come back ! come back ! " they make their cry,
" Come back to lake and wood ;
Quick back, old Paul, you soon must die ;
Come back where life is good ! "
Francis Sterne Palmer.
Books New and Old.
707
BOOKS NEW AND OLD.
SOME BIOGRAPHICAL STUDIES.
IT was Matthew Arnold's stated wish
that he should not be made the subject
of a biography, and occasion for totally
disregarding his preference has not yet
arisen. Sensitive men naturally shrink
from the possibility of post-mortem ex-
posure. They do not make a point of
being thrust into the ground and forgot-
ten ; but they wish to be disposed of de-
cently, and, so far as private life is
concerned, to be disposed of wholly. It
is good to be immortal in one's great-
ness, but it is not good that one's frail
mortality, however comely, should lie
embalmed under the general eye. Yet
the curiosity of the world in these mat-
ters is not altogether idle ; it is founded
on a sturdy belief, favorably reported
upon by experience, that the facts of
private life do really throw light upon
the facts of public achievement. A great
man cannot quite will himself away pri-
vately, for the world knows itself to be
his rightful legatee, and is pretty sure to
come to its own sooner or later. We
may yet be given the last detail about
Arnold.
I.
His published letters were deprived
of their more intimate touches under the
strict censorship of his family. Their
editor, deploring the fact that such treat-
ment of them seemed necessary, yet con-
siders them " the nearest approach to a
narrative of Arnold's life which can,
consistently with his wishes, be given to
the world." In his present book l Mr.
Russell makes no attempt to supplement
the personal information which the let-
ters afforded. Nor is it his purpose to
offer a fresh estimate of Arnold's work
1 Matthew Arnold. By G. W. E. ROSSELI,.
Literary Lives. New York : Charles Scribner's
Sons. 1904.
from the purely literary point of view.
" I do not aim," he prefaces, " at a
criticism of the verbal medium through
which a great master uttered his heart
and mind, but rather at a survey of the
effect which he produced on the thought
and action of his age." The ensuing
study is admirable for its scrupulous
moderation, its breadth, its directness,
— its fitness to be called criticism in Ar-
nold's sense of the word. Its historical
method is consistent with the adopted
attitude toward Arnold as a man of the
hour. It considers the kind and the ex-
tent of authority which Arnold came to
exercise as a critic of national life. It
does not claim infallibility for his specific
judgments. On the contrary, Mr. Rus-
sell is careful to suggest the fallacy or
incompletion of many of the critic's theo-
ries. He notes that Arnold's politics
were "rather fantastic;" that his theo-
ries of educational reform stopped short
of the public school and the university ;
and that his objections to generally re-
ceived dogmas were, for the most part,
based upon dogmas of his own. But
these, we are shown, are matters of com-
paratively little moment. Arnold's ser-
vice was to present to his generation
certain ideals of culture, certain princi-
ples of conduct. He suggested a point
of view from which others in common
with him might have, not a certainty,
but a fairest possible chance, of discern-
ment. There is hardly a more invidious
office than that of the critic of national
life. He must find some ideal ground
of vantage ; he must keep aloof upon it ;
he must be meek and fearless ; and for
reward the majority will charge him
with bias, or fastidiousness, or addiction
to theory. What, in the face of such
difficulties, Arnold accomplished as ad-
708
Books New and Old.
vocate of conduct through culture is
Mr. Russell's theme. Belief in the per-
fectibility of human conduct is, indeed,
the first article in Arnold's creed. For
his own generation, culture was the spe-
cific instrument which he found it well
to recommend, but he never ceased to
declare that conduct was three fourths
of life. It is accordingly in the chapters
on Society and Conduct that we find the
best substance of the present study.
In the end Mr. Russell does not resist
the impulse to insert a sketch of Arnold's
intimate personality ; a sketch worth the
attention of those who, puzzled by Ar-
nold's ironies or niceties, imagine him
to have been a cold or supercilious per-
son : " ' Never,' as Mr. John Morley
said, ' shall we know again so blithe and
friendly a spirit.' As we think of him,
the endearing traits come crowding on
the memory, — his gracious presence,
his joy in fresh air and bodily exercise,
his merry interest in his friends' con-
cerns, his love of children, his kindness
to animals, his absolute freedom from
bitterness, rancor, or envy ; his unstinted
admiration of beauty or cleverness." . . .
It chances that another study of Ar-
nold has just appeared,1 which is under-
taken in a similar spirit. It has, that
is, more to say of the public censor than
of the man or the man of letters. Mr.
Dawson, however, is concerned with
what Arnold means to the present and
the future rather than to the past. He
wishes, moreover, " to give unity to Ar-
nold's ideas and theories, to his admoni-
tions and warnings. For the Voice still
cries, and it cries in the wilderness."
The author's treatment of this theme pos-
sesses unity, but not proportion. More
than half his space is given to the dis-
cussion of Arnold's theological writings,
though the critic expressly states his be-
lief that they are " on the whole the
least necessary and the least serviceable
part of his literary work." These chap-
1 Matthew Arnold and His Relation to the
Thought of Our Time. By WILLIAM HARBUTT
ters might well have made a book by
themselves ; they bulk too large in a
study of Arnold's total effectiveness.
Mr. Dawson's style is not obscure, but
stiff and unwieldy. His habit of very
full quotation makes of the book a kind
of ordered thesaurus of Arnold's best
passages. But it is more than this, for
if the writer has no novel interpretation
to offer, he has a serviceable one. " If,"
he says, " one were to attempt to sum-
marize in a single phrase the ideal which
Arnold sought to realize, and in a rare
degree succeeded in realizing, that phrase
would be ' the balance of life.' . . . The
man who confessed that the best his in-
tellect knew was drawn from the thought
of pagan antiquity, yet nursed in his
breast a moral code as stern and austere
as that of Hebrew prophet."
n.
What Arnold was to the prophecy of
conduct, Newman was to the prophecy
of faith. To Arnold religion was " mo-
rality touched by emotion ; " to New-
man it was " an assertion of what we
are to believe ... a message, a history,
or a vision." Moreover, by Newman's
creed, conduct " flows not from infer-
ences, but from impressions, — not from
reasonings, but from Faith." In his
Oxford days, Arnold himself came un-
der the influence of the great mystic,
and remembered the experience with
tenderness, as the well-known passage in
the address on Emerson attests : " Who
could resist the charm of that spiritual
apparition, gliding in the dim afternoon
light through the aisles of St. Mary's,
rising into the pulpit, and then, in the
most entrancing of voices, breaking the
silence with words and thoughts which
were a religious music — subtle, sweet,
"mournful ? I seem to hear him still."
But Arnold had no sympathy with the
step which gave supreme expression to
Newman's inner life : " He has adopted
DAWSON. New York and London : G. P. Put-
nam's Sons. 1904.
Books New and Old.
709
for the doubts and difficulties which be-
set men's minds to-day a solution which,
to speak frankly, is impossible."
Newman's present biographer is not
inclined to dispose so summarily of that
career. His interpretation of it l is an
achievement of rare sympathy and skill.
He discerns at the base of Newman's
character " a marvelous sensibility, with-
out which he could never have thrown
himself into minds unlike his own, or
have acquired the exquisite delicacy of
touch that renders thought as if it were
the painter's landscape spread out be-
fore him in light and shade. . . . Im-
agination, with Newman, was reason, as
with Carlyle, Wordsworth, Goethe, and
Shakespeare, — not the bare mechanical
process that grinds out conclusions from
letters of the alphabet, in what is at best
a luminous void, but the swift, sudden
grasp of an explorer, making his way
from crag to crag, under him the raging
sea, above him sure ground and deliver-
ance." To such a sense Culture, with
all its claims, could not offer a straight
road toward perfection ; the only safety
lay in the message of Revelation. It is
plain that Arnold could not quite for-
give the cardinal's indifference to " the
Zeitgeist," that object of his own almost
superstitious reverence. Newman's rev-
erence was for the Eternal Spirit, and
for the institution which he took to be its
earthly embodiment. Dr. Barry's book
reinforces one's conviction that Newman
was not only the purest product of a re-
markable reactionary movement, but a
true prophet of the immemorial and the
unseen.
One notes that in literary theory and
practice these two sons of Oxford had
not a little in common. Both, regarding
literature as a means rather than an end,
worked through it, not for it. " People
think I can teach them style," said Ar-
nold. "What stuff it all is! Have
1 Cardinal Newman. By WILLIAM BARRY,
D. D. Literary Lives. New York : Charles
Scribner's Sons. 1904.
something to say, and say it as clearly
as you can. That is the only secret of
style." — " Can they really think," writes
Newman, " that Homer, or Pindar, or
Shakespeare, or Dryden, or Walter Scott
were accustomed to aim at style for its
own sake, instead of being inspired with
their subject, and pouring forth beauti-
ful words because they had beautiful
thoughts ? This is surely too great a
paradox to be borne. . . . The artist
has his great or rich visions before him ;
and his only aim is to bring out what he
thinks or what he feels in a way ade-
quate to the thing spoken of, and appro-
priate to the speaker."
It promises much that the two books
by Mr. Russell and Dr. Barry should
be the first numbers of a new biographi-
cal series. The scale is a trifle larger
than that of the English Men of Let-
ters Series, and the volumes are consid-
erably larger. The numerous portraits
inserted do not appear to augment sen-
sibly the value of the text.
in.
The nineteenth century underwent
much stern discipline at the hands of its
great men. There was Newman's sword
of the spirit for its infidelity, Arnold's
intellectual rapier for its Philistinism,
and Carlyle's inspired cudgel for its ma-
terialism. Perhaps the cudgel-play was
relished least of all ; the offender has
certainly been sufficiently maltreated in
effigy since the period of his offense.
The ill-savor of the Froude affair seems
to have lingered in the public nostril
quite long enough. We may be grate-
ful that the newly published letters 2 are
not made an occasion of further contro-
versy. These volumes are by way of
sequel to Professor Norton's collection ;
and a large part of the letters here
printed were chosen by him. One un-
derstands that a considerable mass of
2 New Letters of Thomas Carlyle. Edited and
Annotated by ALEXANDER CARLYLE. 2 vols.
London and New York : John Lane. 1904.
710
Books New and Old.
correspondence still remains, from which,
doubtless, a further gleaning may some
time be made. The quality of the pre-
sent selection indicates no thinning of the
strain, though it serves to confirm rather
than to modify our impression of the writ-
er. The continued flow of valetudinary
data (hardly to be equaled unless in Mrs.
Carlyle's letters) we might be happier
without ; it would be pleasant to think
of that strong spirit as not always on
the rack of physical anguish. But this
is a price we must pay for our admission
into the most intimate relations with
him. A very large proportion of these
letters are addressed to his wife, his
mother, or his brother. Of the detailed
chat about his plans and his work there
is much, and none too much. Of gen-
eral matter, as purely literary, as purely
the fruit of his genius as anything which
he wrote to be printed, there is a great
deal. There are passages of unmerciful
self-criticism, — a series of them, apropos
of the French Revolution, might easily
be collected. " Heigho ! " he sighs
when his task is half done. " It seems
as if I were enchanted [enchained ?] to
this sad Book : peace in the world there
will be none for me till I have it done.
And then very generally, it seems the
miserablest mooncalf of a book ; full of
Ziererei, affectation (do what I will) ;
tumbling headforemost through all man-
ner of established rules. And no money
to be had for it ; and no value that I
can count on of any kind : simply the
blessedness of being done with it ! " As
it is going through the press he says yet
more sternly : "I find ' on a general
view ' that the Book is one of the sav-
agest written for several centuries : it is
a Book written by a wild man, a man
disunited from the fellowship of the
world he lives in ; looking King and
beggar in the face with an indifference
of brotherhood, an indifference of con-
tempt, — that is really very extraor-
dinary in a respectable country. ... A
wild man ; — pray God only it be a
man ! And then buff away ; smite and
spare not : the thing you can kill, I say
always, deserves not to live."
The letters yield many notable ad-
ditions to the gallery of portraits which
the world owes to Carlyle. Here is a
sketch at first sight of the poet Rogers,
of whom Carlyle later makes more than
one gentle mention : " A half -frozen old
sardonic Whig-Gentleman : no hair at all,
but one of the whitest bare scalps, blue
eyes, shrewd, sad and cruel ; toothless
horse-shoe mouth drawn up to the very
nose ; slow - croaking, sarcastic insight,
perfect breeding ; state-rooms where you
are welcomed even with flummery ; in-
ternally a Bluebeard's chamber, where
none but the proprietor enters ! " And
here is " American Webster : " "A ter-
rible, beetle-browed, mastiff - mouthed,
yellow - skinned, broad - bottomed, grim-
taciturn individual ; with a pair of dull-
cruel-looking black eyes, and as much
Parliamentary intellect and silent-rage
in him, I think, as I have ever seen in
any man."
There are, moreover, innumerable pas-
sages expressing that mood of passionate
quandary which characterizes so much
of Carlyle's work. " Curious : there
is a work which we here and now could
best of all do ; that were the thing of
things for us to set about doing. But
alas, what is it ? A advises one thing,
B another thing, C, still more resolutely,
a third thing ! The whole Human Spe-
cies actually or virtually advise all man-
ner of things ; and our own vote, which
were the soul of all votes, the word
where all else are hearsays, lies deep-
buried, drowned in outer noises, too
difficult to come at ! " On the whole,
the earlier letters are of the greater in-
terest, but readers who have really ex-
perienced Carlyle will value all of them.
IV.
These letters complete what their edi-
tor calls the " Epistolary Autobiogra-
phy " of Carlyle. Mr. Brown's life of
Books New and Old.
711
John Addington Symonds, which has re-
cently been reprinted,1 was prepared by
a modification of this method. Symonds's
Autobiography, like Carlyle's Reminis-
cences, is tinged with the sombreness
inherent in the recollections of most men
who have passed their prime. Symonds
himself said, " No autobiographical re-
sumption of facts, after the lapse of
twenty-five years, is equal in veracity to
contemporary records." Mr. Brown,
sharing this opinion, e.ffected a skillful
composition of materials drawn from the
autobiography, letters, diaries, and note-
books which on Symonds's death came
into his hands. Compilation is altogether
too modest a word for the result, as the
editor's interpolated fragments of nar-
rative and comment are by no means the
least valuable parts of the whole. Sy-
monds perhaps represented quite as dis-
tinct a type of Oxford culture as either
Arnold or Newman. He had something
of Arnold's intellectual curiosity without
his power of coming to conclusions, some-
thing of Newman's religious aspiration
without his faith. His ample means, his
ill-health, his extreme impressionable-
ness, united in exposing him to dilettante-
ism, but he weathered the exposure.
He was not a genius, but his talent was
of the first order, and he made the most
of it, in the face of his various disabili-
ties. He was painfully aware of his
shortcomings of temperament and en-
dowment ; the victim of an emotional
skepticism which he looked upon with
loathing, of a creative impotence which
caused him the keenest chagrin : " Why
do I say, ' Lord, Lord,' and do not ?
Here is my essential weakness. I wish
and cannot will. I feel intensely, I per-
ceive quickly, sympathize with all I see,
or hear, or read. To emulate things no-
bler than myself is my desire. But I can-
1 John Addington Symonds : A Biography
Compiled from His Papers and Correspondence.
By HORATIO F. BROWN. London : Smith,
Elder & Co. ; New York : Charles Scribner's
Sons. 1903.
not get beyond — create, originate, win
Heaven by prayers and faith, have trust
in God, and concentrate myself upon an
end of action. Skepticism is my spirit."
A frock-coated Hamlet ! one might ex-
claim, taking such passages as this over-
seriously. They represent Symonds at
his worst ; what he was at his best, the
record of his friendships, of his joys, of
his labors abundantly shows : not a great
man, but certainly not an ineffectual
man.
Another striking figure of the near past
has been thrown into the foreground,
for American readers, at least, by a bi-
ography of the hour.2 General Arm-
strong stood for much that was best in
our mid-century phase, and it is good to
have so careful a study of him as the
present book affords. His was a char-
acter at quite the opposite pole from
that of Symonds. He was essentially a
man of action, alert, resolute, direct.
He possessed abounding vitality, a re-
liable instinct for duty, a preference for
rough tasks. His brief academic ex-
perience was interrupted by the war.
Thenceforth it was his business to act, not
to study. His mind did not lack soil
for intellectual cultivation, but it was
destined for a ruder tillage. From boy-
hood his impulse was to cast himself into
the first breach, and, once in, to stay till
there was no more work for him to do
there. " Missionary or pirate " was his
own boyish prophecy, and a missionary
he turned out to be. He was not a man
of one idea, but he was a man of one
aim. To edit a Hawaiian newspaper,
to lead his black regiment in a desperate
charge at Gettysburg, to put up a new
building at Hampton, — any one of these
activities was capable of absorbing all
his powers. Life was a struggle which
he thoroughly enjoyed, and he was never
2 Samuel Chapman Armstrong : A Biograph-
ical Study. By EDITH ARMSTRONG TAL-
BOT. New York : Doubleday, Page & Co.
1904.
712
Books New and Old.
beaten. Here is a brief expression of
his creed, uttered at the very inception
of the Hampton enterprise. He does
not minimize the difficulties before him,
but declines to take the possibility of
failure into consideration : " The enter-
prise is as full of bad possibilities as of
good ones ; most embarrassing condi-
tions will occur from time to time ; all
is experiment, but all is hopeful. . . .
What can resist steady energetic pres-
sure, the force of a single right idea
pushed mouth after month in its natural
development? . . . Few men compre-
hend the deep philosophy of one-man
power."
General Armstrong had a natural love
of literature, and his small opportunity
for reading caused him sincere regret.
But he could .not by any possibility have
been satisfied with the life of a literary
man. To stand aside and comment would
have been the most irksome of tasks for
him ; nor, to say truth, would his criti-
cism have been worth much. His own
path he knew. At thirty he writes cheer-
fully from Boston : " I have been over
the ' Athens,' but would n't live here for
anything. I am glad I 'm on the out-
posts doing frontier duty and pioneer
work, for the South is a heathen land,
and Hampton is on the borders thereof.
I see my whole nature calls me to the
work that is done there — to lay founda-
tions strong, and not do frescoes and
fancy work." In this spirit his lifework
was done ; he had no sense of personal
virtue in it. " Few men have had the
chance that I have had," he wrote to-
ward the end. " I never gave up or
sacrificed anything in my life — have
been, seemingly, guided in everything."
The present biographical sketch of
this strong man's life is written by one
of his daughters, with much simplicity
and modesty ; the record of a personal-
ity and a career well worth summarizing
in print, though they have written thetn-
1 The Hour-Glass and Other Plays : Being
Volume Two of Plays for an Irish Theatre.
selves most effectively otherwise than in
words.
H. W. Boynton.
WHATEVER trepidation may attend
Three Dra- the opening of Mr. Yeats's
matic Stud-
ies. second volume of Plays for an
Irish Theatre * will be happily dispatched
by a glance. One may be equally grate-
ful for what these little plays are not and
for what they are. They contain none
of the air-drawn. pseudo-Maeterlinckian
fantasy which made so puzzling an affair
of Where There is Nothing, the first play
in the series. It may be that a symbol
now and then shows its head, but it is
not encouraged to occupy the foreground.
Indeed, Mr. Yeats seems here to have
deliberately betaken himself to allegory,
which in one of his prose essays he so
sharply distinguishes from symbolism ;
" dramatic fables " is the phrase he uses
for these plays in his Dedication. They
are written in simple prose, Irish in fibre
rather than in dress. The Hour-Glass
is a Morality which superficially reminds
one of Everyman. " The Wise Man " is
suddenly warned of approaching death.
He perceives that his wisdom has been
folly, but his repentance comes too late.
The best bargain he can make with the
Angel of Death is the promise of eventual
salvation if in the hour that remains he
can find one who believes. His wife and
children, his pupils and neighbors fail
him ; they have learned their lesson from
him far too well. At last, as the final
grains drop from the hour-glass, the Fool,
of whom nothing is expected, proves the
wisest of all, and the Wise Man is saved :
" I understand it all now. One sinks in
on God ; we do not see the truth ; God
sees the truth in us." . . . All this ap-
pears to suggest not only a universal
truth, but a specific condition. It is a
vindication of faith as against reason,
and of Irish priestcraft as against Irish
skepticism.
By W. B. YEATS. New York : The Macmillan
Co. 1904.
Books New and Old.
713
Cathleen ni Hoolihan makes a direct
appeal to the devotion of Young Ireland
for Old Ireland ; not in the name of the
shillalah, but gently, with much pathos
and much simplicity. " One night,"
reads the Dedication, "I had a dream,
almost as distinct as a vision, of a cottage
where there was well-being and firelight
and talk of a marriage, and into the
midst of that cottage there came an old
woman in a long cloak. She was Ire-
land herself, that Cathleen ni Hoolihan,
for whom so many songs have been sung
and about whom so many stories have
been told and for whose sake so many
have gone to their death." She takes
the bridegroom with her when she goes ;
there is work for him to do : —
" BRIDGET [laying her hand on Pat-
rick's arm\. Did you see an old woman
going down the path ?
" PATRICK. I did not, but I saw a
young girl, and she had the walk of a
queen."
The third sketch seems to be pure
kindly satire upon Irish simplicity, upon
Irish cunning.
In the Dedication Mr. Yeats expresses
gratitude to a friend who has helped him
"down out of that high window of dra-
matic verse," to a renewed acquaintance
with " the country speech." The result-
ing " dramatic fables " have been suc-
cessfully produced in Dublin and Lon-
don. They would be a boon to our stage,
upon which the Irishman has roared in
farce quite long enough.
Meanwhile the " high window of dra-
matic verse " continues to be occupied,
not always happily. Mr. Hardy's pre-
sent volume, we note with concern, is
only the first installment of a work of
imposing proportions.1 Several hundred
speaking human characters are promised
for the whole Drama, not to speak of an
Ancient Spirit of the Years, a Spirit of
the Pities, Spirits Sinister and Ironic, etc.
1 The Dynasts : A Drama of the Napoleonic
Wars, in Three Parts, Nineteen Acts, and One
Hundred and Thirty Scenes. Part First. By
Obviously this is not to be a drama of
the practical sort. In his Preface the
author goes so far as to speculate "whe-
ther mental performance alone may not
eventually be the fate of all drama other
than that of contemporary or frivolous
life." He admits, however, that this
work is rather a " panoramic show "
than in any strict sense a drama. A
panoramic show, one supposes somewhat
vaguely, ought to possess lucidity, mo-
bility, the color and the flow of life in
the mass. The multitudinous scenes in
the present effort are full of information,
comment, and proper names ; they are
empty of persons and of poetry. They
have logical continuity, but no creative
unity whatever. They do not flow into
one another ; they are stuck up side by
side, like photographs on a wall. They
are, in short, the work of a master of
realistic fiction in a field altogether alien
to his powers. Mr. Hardy has never
proved himself a poet in a small way ;
he here scores a failure in the colossal
style. His verse is for the most part an
achievement of elaborate mischance : —
A verbiage marked by nothing more of weight
Than ignorant irregularity,
as he makes Sheridan say in the course
of a remarkable versified report of a
parliamentary debate. The Spirits have
a particularly crabbed and toplofty habit
of speech. It is the Ancient Spirit of
the Years (and not Ancient Pistol) who
emits this extraordinary couplet : —
So may ye judge Earth's jackaclocks to be
Not fugled by one Will, but function-free.
Mr. Hardy has, one discovers after some
exercise of patience, succeeded in throw-
ing emphasis upon England's part in the
Napoleonic struggle, and in expressing
a healthy British scorn for Napoleon
and other foreign persons.
Mr. William Vaughn Moody has a
true instinct not only for poetry but
for dramatic poetry, as readers of his
THOMAS HARDY. New York : The Macmillan
Co. 1904.
714
Books New and Old.
Masque of Judgment have cause to know.
That is to stand, it appears, as the sec-
ond number of a dramatic trilogy, in
which The Fire-Bringer J is to hold first
place. No more promising, no more ex-
acting theme than the Promethean myth
could be chosen for such a sequence. No
American poet of the present generation
is better qualified to deal with it than
Mr. Moody. The present dramatic study
is in no way inferior to that which ante-
dated it in publication ; and this is high
praise. Mr. Moody's versification is al-
together free from meretriciousness. It
is of classical directness and purity. The
same qualities belong to the larger treat-
ment of his theme. An occasional chorus
of irregular metre suggests the Greek
dramatic habit ; but only suggests it.
The opening dialogue between Deuka-
lion and Pyrrha acquaints the imagined
auditor with the situation. The aged
pair, preserved by the warning of Pro-
metheus from the flood by which Zeus
had determined to destroy the race of
men, have from stones and earth magi-
cally created a new but helpless and hope-
less race, lacking the boon of human love,
of which, with the boon of fire, Zeus has
bereft the world. Their only gleam of
cheer is in the lyrical presence of Pan-
dora, their only hope in the continued
magnanimity of Prometheus. The spe-
cific action concerns that prodigious theft
of fire, brought " secretly in a fennel-
stalk," and the consequent restoration of
happiness to the world. There are many
passages which one would like to quote,
— that description of Pandora singing to
the Stone Men and the Earth Women :
There by the pool they sat, with faces lift
And brows of harsh attention ; in their midst
Pandora bowed, and sang a doubtful song,
Its meaning faint or none, but mingled up
Of all that nests and housekeeps in the heart,
Or puts out in lone passion toward the vast
And cannot choose but go.
1 The Fire-Bringer. By WILLIAM VAUGHN
MOODY. Boston and New York : Houghton,
Mifflin & Co. 1904.
Or that first entrance of Prometheus : —
Pyrrha.
0 swift-comer, it is thou !
None other, thou, wind-ranger, bringer-in !
Child, be awake ! Prometheus !
Prometheus (entering, lifts Pyrrha).
Do not so ;
These hands come poor ; these feet bring no-
thing back.
Pyrrha.
Thy hands come filled with thee, thy feet from
thence
Have brought thee hither ; it is gifts enough.
Or the Fire-Bringer's account of his first
attempt at the mighty theft : —
Soft as light I passed
The perilous gates that are acquainted forth,
The walls of starry safety and alarm,
The pillars and the awful roofs of song,
The stairs and colonnades whose marble work
Is spirit, and the joinings spirit also, —
And from the well-brink of his central court
Dipped vital fire of fire, flooding my vase,
Glutting it arm-deep in the keen element.
Then backward swifter than the osprey dips
Down the green slide of the sea. . . .
At the end the punishment of Prome-
theus is hardly more than presaged ; the
third member of the trilogy, therefore,
is to deal with that part of the myth
which has been turned oftenest into poe-
try. We are promised it in the course
of a year or two, and have reason for
looking forward to its appearance with
lively interest, and with not a little con-
fidence.
IT is to be hoped that to not a few
Warwick of the American visitors who
Castle and , . .
its Earls. form so large an element in
that never - ending procession of sight-
seers which passes through Warwick
Castle, the sumptuous volumes in which
Lady Warwick has recorded its history 2
may serve as a permanent memorial of
a pleasure, to some almost painfully
keen, because perforce so brief. The
Castle, indeed, is in many ways chief
among those historic houses which in
2 Warwick Castle and its Earls, from Saxon
Times to the Present Day. By the COUNTESS OF
WARWICK. New York : E. P. Dutton & Co. ;
London : Hutchinson & Co. 1903.
Books New and Old.
715
their beauty, as much as in their gran-
deur, are the peculiar glory of England.
Its story and that of its masters must
of necessity include an epitome of Eng-
lish history during a thousand years,
and as to legend and romance, one can
go back into the wonderland of a dim
past with John Rous, the worthy fif-
teenth-century Warwickshire antiquary,
who asserts that Warwick was founded
about the time of " the birth of King
Alexander the Greek conqueror." Lady
Warwick writes in a straightforward,
unaffected style, and her work being in
its nature largely that of a compiler,
she selects and uses her material with
excellent judgment and a due sense of
proportion. She gives space enough,
and not too much, to a consideration of
the legendary chronicles, and the au-
thentic but rather scanty records of the
Saxon and Norman earls. The first
figures that can really be vitalized are
of the house of Beauchamp, especially
its greatest son, Richard, of whom the
Emperor Sigismund declared that he
had not his equal in Christendom " for
Wisdom, Nurture, and Manhood, — if
all Courtesie were lost, it might be found
in him again ; " and whose noble monu-
ment in the centre of the beautiful
chapel he founded has kept him in re-
membrance even to this day. The ca-
reer of this all - accomplished knight's
more famous son-in-law, the king-maker,
is clearly and well described, and with
him the old order passes, his hapless
grandson, the Plantagenet earl, being
the most pitiful victim of the new rule.
The outlines, at least, of the history
of one of the most notorious instru-
ments of that new rule, Edmund Dud-
ley, and of his son and grandsons, are
tolerably well known to most readers.
Lady Warwick, in a very good summing-
up of the characteristics of the most
conspicuous members of the family that
held the earldom under the Tudors,
says : " Their ambition was overween-
ing and outran their talents. . . . But
they figured impressively on the stage,
and realized the pageant of life better
than any of their contemporaries." By
the aid of The Black Book of Warwick
she is able to revivify some of this splen-
dor of life, and the whole varied story of
the house of Dudley is well told. But
why is the little son and heir of Leices-
ter — the child of the Countess Lettice
— passed over in the narrative, and his
identity confounded with that of his
elder half-brother ? All visitors in the
Beauchamp Chapel linger at the tomb
of " the noble imp," and one can im-
agine the hopeless perplexity of the ear-
nest tourist when he finds this childish
designation, and even the boy's monu-
ment, given to Sir Robert Dudley, who
died and was buried in Tuscany more
than threescore years after the effigy of
his small brother had been placed in the
Lady Chapel. There is no lack of in-
terest in the annals of the house of Rich,
or of contrasts in character ; — witness
that altogether evil man, the Lord Chan-
cellor ; his grandson, for no personal
merit made Earl of Warwick, and of
whom " Stella " was the unwilling bride ;
their son, the sturdy Puritan admiral,
whose saintly daughter - in - law, Mary
Boyle, is sketched at full length, a most
living picture with her little foibles and
great virtues. Then, in the eighteenth
century, the family obscurely ending, the
earldom came to the house of Greville,
who had possessed the Castle since the
passing of the Dudleys.
" Fulke Greville, servant to Queen
Elizabeth, councillor to King James, and
friend to Sir Philip Sidney," — thus he
wrote his epitaph, — made future gen-
erations his debtor by his admirable res-
toration and enlargement of the half-
ruined Castle, which he also " beautified
with the most pleasant gardens." Two
hundred years later, George Greville,
the second earl of his house, restored
and supplemented his predecessor's work,
and gathered from far and near those
treasures of art with which the world is
716
The Contributors' Club.
familiar. A word of appreciation must
be given to the author's spirited and
sympathetic sketch of that Lord Brooke,
the Parliamentary leader, who was slain
at Lichfield, and was in his short life an
exemplar of all that was best in the Lib-
eralism of his time. One regrets that
more space could not have been given to
descriptions of the Castle and St. Mary's
Church as well. Architecture in such a
connection is by no means so " dull " a
subject as the writer fears it to be. Space
fails to do justice to the illustrations
which are given in lavish abundance and
are excellently well selected. There are
portraits, from the illuminations of the
Rous Roll to the photographs of to-day,
relics of every kind, and views without
number of the Castle and its surround-
ings, indicating, so far as pencil and
camera may, not only the " grey magni-
ficence," but something of the dream-
like charm of the place. In a few well-
chosen closing words, the author shows
how she and Lord Warwick have striven
to blend the old and the new, and to
fulfill in various ways the duties of their
stewardship. Surely one of these duties
has been fulfilled in the preparation of
these chronicles.
THE CONTRIBUTORS' CLUB.
OKE summer Sunday morning, a num-
The Mouth ber of vears ag°> I dropped
ol the Mime. jn at the FrenCh Protestant
Church on Washington Square, New
York. It was a little late and the
preacher had begun his discourse. He
was a man of commanding presence, and
possessed of one of the most fortunate
voices, for his calling, that I had ever
listened to. I do not at all remember
what he said, but I was curiously at-
tracted by the way in which he said it,
by the purity and flexibility of his enun-
ciation, and by the subtle play of ex-
pression with which it was accompanied,
and particularly by the art — delicate
and unobtrusive and effective, but clearly
the art — with which he used his lips.
I was conscious of a haunting suggestion
of some other mouth that I had seen
betraying the like skill, employed with
equal mastery, in quite different sur-
roundings. It was only at the close of
the service, when the preacher recited
the Lord's Prayer with peculiar fervor
and solemnity, that I recognized that the
suggested parallel was with Coquelin
aine, whom I had heard recently, and
as I passed out I learned by inquiry
that the accomplished orator to whom I
had been listening was the then famous
M. Loyson, the Pere Hyacinthe whose
eloquence had once enthralled the audi-
ences of Notre Dame.
The incident set me upon one of those
desultory studies which engage most of us
more fascinatingly than our regular pur-
suits ; from time to time I seized every
opportunity that presented itself to com-
pare the mouths of orators and actors,
and I came to think, with considerable
reason, that I could recognize a man of
either profession at sight by that sole
indicium, especially, as not infrequently
happened, if the case observed was that
of a really successful practitioner of
either. Naturally the comparison was
easiest between the actors and the pul-
pit speakers, since in our land of many
sects and scant ceremonial the latter
are as numerous as the former. The
analogy, however, was as evident among
secular speakers, — Mr. Curtis, ColoneJ
Ingersoll, Mr. Bryan, and Mr. Bourke
Cockran, among political speakers ; while
my memory ran back to Phillips and
The Contributors' Club.
Ill
Sumner. One condition, it must be
noted, was practically essential. The
mouths of all my subjects of study were
unhidden by beards, and it is worth not-
ing that, while this is the rule in the
Roman Catholic Church, and the pretty
general practice in others, nearly all the
most successful orators I have known
have kept the lips shaven, as actors, al-
most of necessity, do. The distinguish-
ing characteristics of the mouth common
to the stage, the pulpit, and the platform
are more easily recognized than de-
scribed. It is generally large, larger
than other mouths, and rather out of
proportion to the rest of the features.
Possibly this is an accompaniment of the
temperament that leads to the callings
noted. Possibly, also, the greater and
more frequent use of the voice in circum-
stances requiring unusual effort may tend
to the development of the lips. But the
most marked characteristic of the mouth
I am discussing is the impression it al-
ways conveys to me of a certain con-
sciousness of it on the part of its owner.
It is not artificiality ; that is a crude
and offensive word by which to denote
its peculiarity ; but one feels that such
a mouth does not work, as the heart beats
or the eyes wink, without much conscious-
ness, and wholly without control from
the possessor. With the actor there is a
more or less definite training of the lips
and an acquired art in using them. Is
a like result attained in the other pro-
fessions as the consequence of using the
mouth in public, under the gaze of mul-
titudes whom the speaker aims to move ?
As the speaker inevitably asks himself
how his speech affects his hearers, and
how his voice sounds to them, does he,
from the same natural impulse, question
the effect produced by his countenance
and by the mouth, perhaps the most ex-
pressive feature ? And does this faint
habit of half - intended self - contempla-
tion induce the corresponding habit of
attempted control? If so, there is no
harm in it. He who seeks to move his
fellows by speech is entitled to employ
all the resources of his nature to that
end ; and if thereby he lose a little of
the candid, the unforced, the revealing
expression proper to the mouths of most
other men and nearly all women, it may
be that the loss is amply made up.
I AM afraid I am old-fashioned. I
I Take My always have mildly suspected
Niece to LJTT • T * i
Parsifal. as much, but since 1 took
Miss Dolly to Parsifal, and she told me
so quite frankly and brutally, my suspi-
cion has mounted to positive fear. I
did misbehave myself outrageously at
Parsifal, I must admit. Not that I
whispered to Dolly the amusing things
I thought — or not many of them ; but
I went fast asleep during the second act,
just at the moment (one of Wagner's long
moments) when the ascetic hero was in
most danger of becoming humanized.
And when the Festival Play was over I
asked Dolly if she were quite sure that
it was time to go home. We had
reached the opera house at five. It was
then eleven-forty. Miss Dolly smothered
a yawn, and replied that I was a brute.
Miss Dolly's mother, who has known me
longer than Dolly has, had a warm sup-
per ready for us when we did get home,
and a smile of sympathy. Dolly said,
as she sipped her chocolate, that she
considered it a " perfect shame " for
any one to produce Parsifal in English,
to dramatize it, to put it on the stage
here, there, and everywhere, with any
sort of singers in the cast, as is going to
be done.
" On the contrary," said I, " I heart-
ily approve."
"You do?" cried Dolly. "Well,
I 'd like to know why ! "
" Because," I answered, " the more it
is produced the less there will be writ-
ten about it. Besides, if enough people
see it the humbug will be exposed. You
can't fool all of the people, you know,
all" —
But Miss Dolly was gone, in a fine
temper.
718
The Contributors' Club.
I am quite prepared to admit, of
course, that Miss Dolly was profoundly
moved by Parsifal, as by all of Wag-
ner's works. Indeed, she accepts the
master with much more liberality than
some other people I know. She has
confided to me that she never sees
Lohengrin without weeping, though I
believe it is the fashion of the advanced,
or ritualistic, Wagnerites to look with
little favor on that earlier opera. Nor
am I questioning her perfect right to do
so. If she chooses to weep at Lohengrin,
— bless her dear eyes and the tender
heart that speaks behind them ! — why
should I wish to prevent? I would even
permit her to be thrilled by the dragon
in Siegfried, a piece of mechanism which
would not be tolerated seriously on the
dramatic stage, even in a Drury Lane
extravaganza. I am sorry that I ever
read her Tolstoy's sprightly description
of the performance of Siegfried he wit-
nessed ; she tried so hard not to smile !
All I ask is that she and her fellow Wag-
nerites shall not ask me to weep, or be
thrilled, or follow them in their enthu-
siasm, — or go with them again to Par-
sifal !
And yet I love opera ; even Miss Dolly
will back me up in that. I am, as she
says, old - fashioned, though, and the
opera I love was not written by Wagner.
I also love Tom Jones and the novels
of Miss Austen, and the songs Herrick
wrote and Burns, and I do not much
care for the " modern " poetry of some
of Wagner's French contemporaries and
friends, nor for the " problem story " of
to-day. . I fear my old-fashion edness is
fundamental and complete. I wish a
tune, like a story, to begin at the begin-
ning and advance bravely to a middle,
and then flow smoothly to an end, and
I don't object if it takes its own time
about it. I wish it, also, to take me
along with it, to possess sufficient buoy-
ancy to float the perhaps too, too solid
bulk of my emotional nature. Give me
the opera, grave or gay, that was writ-
ten by one of the great masters of mu-
sical narration, and that sings for the
pure love of singing, with old-fashioned
confidence in the creed of melody. Then
I sit back in my seat and ask no ques-
tions of the composer's purpose, as he
flaunts no purpose in my face, but am
simply and unaffectedly happy, full of
the good wine of song.
Something of this I expressed to Miss
Dolly one evening, between acts of The
Marriage of Figaro. Even Miss Dolly
has to admit that she enjoys The Mar-
riage of Figaro. "And my old-fash-
ioned Mozart did just what you say
your modern Wagner does, and did it
better," I added.
" What do you mean ? " said Dolly.
" There is vivid and unfailing char-
acterization in Mozart's orchestral score
throughout," said I, " that never fails to
make its point. But it never interrupts
the flow of the narrative, never ceases
to be truly dramatic. Wagner's ' mo-
tifs ' are episodic and mechanical, hence
undramatic. You see, Miss Dolly, the
difference was here : Mozart, wrapped
up in his story, poured out his music
heedlessly, and it fitted each character
because Mozart was one of those old-
fashioned things called a genius ; he
could n't help it But Wagner fitted a
theme to a character (or a character to
a theme), and the next time that char-
acter appeared I always imagine the
composer scratching his head and say-
ing, ' Now, which motif was it went
with this chap ? ' '
" Well, he always got it right, any-
how," said Miss Dolly triumphantly.
" Yes, I suppose he did," I admitted,
as the lights on the stage flared up and
the champagne of Mozart's music began
to sparkle.
Presently I saw Miss Dolly's head nod-
ding to a contagious rhythm, and her lips
parted with the pleasure that filled all her
pretty person. " The world would be a
dreary place without the old-fashioned
things, even the operas," I reflected.
The Contributors' Club.
719
And then I whispered to her, " You
like this, don't you ? "
" But I can like Wagner, too," she
said. " Oh, why can't you ? "
" Alas," said I, " I am not so young as
you are ! "
I BELONG to that old New England
A Plea for stock, Puritan to the marrow,
Patent AHec- , . ' , „.
tton. which has ever suttered ne-
cessary and unnecessary things for con-
science' sake, and which, since its first
cry of being, has read the Atlantic in-
stead of picture magazines.
They were a worthy, God-fearing lot,
these forbears of mine, having all the
depth of character and soul that one could
reasonably ask for in one's precursors.
And yet at times, — presumably more
often than others, when I am attending
a meeting of Colonial Dames, — in the
course of a recountal of doughty deeds
of divers great-greats, I am seized with
a violent mental attack which I am afraid
will make its way through the decorous
lines of my Colonial visage, so stringent
is its grasp upon me, this grasp of a dia-
bolic desire to have been the descendant
of a Milwaukee beer-brewer, sans soul,
sans blood (blue blood, I mean), sans
conscience, sans everything but a phleg-
matic temperament tempered by the dif-
fuse affectionateness of the Teuton, — a
bit frothy, and on the top, perhaps, like
the beer he brewed, but also giving its
soft, warm rotundity to the famished
form of family life.
And in the midst of this wandering
down a path, too mellow in its softened
lights of color and chiaroscuro for one
destined by fate for the sterner Puritan
path, I am dragged forcibly back by the-
strenuous tones of one whose eight great-
greats all perished at their post of duty,
and whose spirits of sacrifice and con-
tained emotion have so descended to her,
their worthy posterity, that one knows
by the ring in her voice she would cheer-
fully relinquish eight more, were they at
hand, and recite with equal ardor their
fervent demises.
With a sense of shame I pull myself
together to listen how, in the last battle
for noble principle, her only remaining
great-great tore himself away from a
dying wife ; fleeing his potato patch the
instant duty called ; stifling his love in
his heart as a weak and unworthy emo-
tion ; and running full speed to the for-
tress on the hill. Yes, brave he was, —
but why did n't he kiss her good-by, my
Milwaukee ego insists, — it would n't
have taken a minute ; would have made
him no less a hero ; and she might have
died serenely, — sure of his love as well
as his zeal.
The beer-brewer would have done it!
And again my Colonial countenance feels
the red blood coursing through its blue-
blooded veins as the New England heart
lets loose pulses and throbs in an abandon
of joyous emotion over the vision of that
open human love which may be the
greater part of life.
Reverting from the Puritan past to
our present-day America in its more gra-
cious garb of daily living, is it not still
true that albeit the affection is there,
quite as surely as in the hearts of our
Teuton and Romance cousins, it is, never-
theless, latent instead of patent? We
seem to fear showing our feelings as if
there were something ill-bred or not quite
modest about their being brought to the
surface.
Take the typical college man who in-
wardly burns to let a classmate know his
sympathy in a time of sadness. How
does he show it ? Is n't he, in his inherited
tendency to avoid seeming weakly de-
monstrative, more likely to seek relief of
expression in some off-hand remark, with
a friendly clap on the shoulder ? " And
what is the difference," you say, " if the
feeling is there ? The other man realizes
it. He, too, has inherited the penetra-
tion of the Yankee." Very possibly that
is true. But why not let the laws which
govern art and music — which, beyond
all other things, convey human longings
and sympathies and aspirations to hu-
720
The Contributors' Club.
man souls — apply similarly to human
intercourse, which strives, haltingly, to
attain the same goal ? Why use symbols
which are inharmonious expressions of
the thing signified ; which are inartistic,
incongruous, almost brutal sometimes in
their ineptness ?
My plea, then, is not for unseemly
effusiveness, for unrestrained gushings
from the font of fondness, but for the
natural expression in sane and congruous
symbols of a real affection ; the scat-
tering of rosebuds while we may along
the none-too-rosy path of human life.
FELLOW TBAVELEBS are proverbial-
On Travel- ^v conndential> I believe ; and
lag, Again : when the genial globe-trot-
The " Do-
posit "Sys- ters of the January and
March Contributors' Club
took us into their confidence, we were
at once minded to reciprocate.
We are dwellers in a little Western
college town, Joan and I. From the
eastern rim, where the sun peeps up o'
mornings, to the western edge, "where
the quiet coloured end of evening
smiles, " there is no hint that the world
is anything else but prairie. The very
vastness of the distances shuts us in
the more effectually. A mountain we
could climb, with faith that some Pa-
cific would yield us the tramontane
vision granted to Cortes of old time.
But the prairie is no respecter of pe-
destrians, and a day's journey leaves
the rim of the cup as far away as ever.
And down here, in the centre of this
unlimited nothingness, we caught, not
so long ago, the bacillus of the Grand
Tour. Perhaps it was a nonchalant
comment on Paris bookshops, made
by one of our traveled college friends,
that introduced the germ into our sys-
tem. Perhaps it was a passing refer-
ence to a tramp in Switzerland that set
the minute particle in motion. But
certain it is that a letter from a friend
of our youth, whom fate had just taken
on a trip through the Riviera, aroused
the bacillus of the G. T. to feverish
activity.
" Darby, " said Joan to me when the
letter came, "let us go to Europe."
"Done, " said I. And the very next
day a deposit went into the savings
bank, — a deposit between the lines of
which we could read, "Ticket to New
York."
Hardly had the deposit slip been
made out before the smooth prairie rose
into a serrated line of buildings, and
we were walking down Broadway.
"How easy it was," quoth Joan, to
whom Pullman cars are bugbears inde-
scribable. "Shall we not stay in New
York awhile ? " And stay we did for
two months, until "Passage to Liver-
pool " followed " New York " through
the cashier's window. What did it
matter that off there, on the wintry At-
lantic coast, the Noordland was stag-
gering in with ice-covered rigging and
broken steering gear ? We had made
the voyage without turning a hair, and
the hand of the customs officer was as
powerless to delay us at Liverpool as
the hand of Providence had been on
the voyage.
We are in London now, — just at
present happily ensconced in the library
of the British Museum. "Paris " has
not yet been deposited with the cashier ;
"Switzerland" is still a little hazy;
and as for "Italy " — well, we content
ourselves with opening our Browning
at De Gustibus. But in due time
Italy, too, will pass into the custody
of the guardian of our travels, and our
itinerary will be complete.
And then — let me whisper it in
your ear — we shall probably settle
down to such a pleasant satisfaction in
our journeyings that the prairies will
blossom anew to our eyes, and Joan
will say contentedly, " Darby, shall we
stay at home and send the boy ? "
THE
ATLANTIC MONTHLY:
jftaga?ine of literature, Science, art, ana $olitic&
VOL. XCIIL — JUNE, 1904. — No. DLX.
THE GREAT DELUSION OF OUR TIME.
IT would be but human if this age were
a trifle supercilious, not to say deluded,
concerning its own powers. Great things
have been said of it, nor can it be denied
that it has fallen heir to great things.
At least it has enjoyed and tested be-
yond all other ages the fruit of the tree
of knowledge. " It is an epoch," says
John Fiske, " the grandeur of which
dwarfs all others that can be named since
the beginning of the historic period, if
not since man first became distinctively
human. In their mental habits, in their
methods of inquiry, and in the data at
their command, the men of the present
day who have fully kept pace with the
scientific movement are separated from
the men whose education ended in eigh-
teen hundred and thirty by an immea-
surably wider gulf than has ever before
divided one progressive generation of
men from their predecessors. The in-
tellectual development of the human
race has been suddenly, almost abrupt-
ly, raised to a higher plane than that
upon which it had proceeded from the
days of the primitive troglodyte to the
days of our great-grandfathers."
This statement is so far true that it is
dangerous. Doubtless there are a great
many people, possibly a majority of so-
called educated men, who would, without
considering the limitations of scientific
knowledge, accept these words literally,
who have formed the habit of thinking
that the light which we possess to-day is,
compared with that possessed by Luther
or George Washington or Socrates, as
sunlight to starlight. Their view is not
only that we know infinitely more than
George Washington knew, but that we
alone possess the final criteria of know-
ledge. Socrates and Washington knew a
good deal, but they knew vaguely ; they
could not distinguish accurately between
fact and delusion. Our supreme advan-
tage is supposed to be not only that we
know, but that we know we know. This
egotistic cast or vogue of thought en-
velops the mind of the age. It is more
authoritative than Kaiser or Pope, than
dogma or creed. It percolates through
all classes, it penetrates our literature, it
colors our judgment. It predetermines
our view, shapes the outline of our facts,
and is interwoven with the texture of our
thought. In a considerable proportion
of our typical men it has bred a sense
of supreme judicial qualification. In the
presence of a magisterial equipment so
vast and complete, men of previous ages
appear dwarfed ; their efforts seem in-
fantile. Even Jesus appears to grope.
Our Scientific Judiciary does indeed rev-
erence the purity of his spirit, but when
it comes to his authority, or his views
about God, they tenderly but firmly put
him out of court.
Now this sovereign attitude of the hu-
man mind has in the course of history
proved intoxicating, and therefore peril-
ous. There was a man once who said,
" Is not this great Babylon, that I have
built ? " Too much magistracy had be-
gun to impair the finer workings of his
mind. His next step was to eat straw
722
The Great Delusion of our Time.
like an ox. He lost sight somehow of
organic relations. This suggests a vital
question. Does our age actually possess
the equipment for a magisterial attitude ?
Let us apply a test. How does this
equipment work practically ? Light is
a thing the main value of which is prac-
tical. If it be really clear and strong it
should be able to guide our steps. If
the light of our time is to that of other
ages as sunlight to starlight, then it ought
to show us with a clearness never vouch-
safed to Socrates or to Jesus just what
the battle of life is, and how to meet it.
Above all, there is one point at which it
ought to show the path of progressive
evolution, from which it ought to chase
the thicker shadows of the past, the
darker traces of atavism, the ferocious
reminiscence of the brute. I refer to
the social problem. Let us look at the
facts; let us turn to the views that are
prevailing to-day ; let us take those writ-
ers who most thoroughly represent the
magisterial attitude of our times ; let us
see what light they throw on the social
problem, what that radiance is which
has caused the glory of Socrates and of
Jesus to grow pale, and has made the
intellectual distance between Washing-
ton and ourselves so vast that we can
hardly see him. I quote from an article
by Brooks Adams in the Atlantic Month-
ly for last November. Let me ask you
to notice that Mr. Adams speaks not
only from the vantage ground of a care-
ful student and an eyewitness of the so-
cial movement, but as one having final
authority in regard to the laws of the
cosmos.
" From the humblest peasant to the
mightiest empire humanity is waging a
ceaseless and pitiless struggle for exist-
ence in which the unfit perish. This
struggle is maintained with every wea-
pon and by every artifice, and success
is attained not only by endurance and
sagacity, but by cunning and ferocity.
Chief, however, among the faculties
which have given superiority, must rank
the martial quality, for history teaches
us that nothing can compensate a com-
munity for defeat in battle. War is
competition in its fiercest form." " Hu-
man destiny has been wrought out
through war." " The first settlers slew
the Indians, or were themselves slain. . . .
To consolidate an homogeneous empire
we crushed the social system of the South,
and lastly we cast forth Spain. The
story is written in blood, and common
sense teaches us that as the past has been,
so will be the future."
Applying this pitiless principle to our
commercial relations, Mr. Adams argues
that our only salvation is to maintain it
to the bitter end. There is no hope of
improvement ; the human organism must
fight or die. " The evolution of human
society, like that of the brute, must be
along lines of pitiless warfare." Notice
in this quotation what the light of to-day
is, according to Mr. Adams ; it is the
doctrine of Natural Selection. By its
pure white light he discerns without any
illusions the pathway of society. " Hu-
man destiny has been wrought out
through war." " Dreams of peace have
always allured mankind to their undo-
ing." " Nature has decreed that animals
shall compete for life, in other words, de-
stroy or be destroyed. We can hope for
no exemption from the common lot."
Surely nothing could be more logical
than this. It ought to come with a shock
to those who have never thought out in
their own minds the unlimited applica-
tion of this modern scientific theory to
human life. It has been said by the
highest authority, " Natural Selection
works through death." As Mr. Adams
has put it, war is Nature's decree, not
human brotherhood. The latter, alas,
is an illusion, a tradition handed down
from the vague and inconsequential ages.
Nature's real decree for mankind is war
to the knife.
In the Atlantic Monthly for January,
1904, is a powerfully written article by
Mr. London on the Scab, in which the
The Great Delusion of our Time.
723
same view is maintained. I quote the
following : —
" In a competitive society, where men
struggle with one another for food and
shelter, what is more natural than that
generosity, when it diminishes the food
and shelter of men other than he who
is generous, should be held an accursed
thing ? . . . To strike at a man's food
and shelter is to strike at his life, and
in a society organized on a tooth-and-
nail basis, such an act, performed though
it may be under the guise of generos-
ity, is none the less menacing and terri-
ble.
" It is for this reason that a laborer
is so fiercely hostile to another laborer
who offers to work for less pay or longer
hours. . . .
" Thus, the generous laborer, giving
more of a day's work for less return, . . .
threatens the life of his less generous
brother laborer, and, at the best, if he
does not destroy that life, he diminishes
it. Whereupon the less generous laborer
looks upon him as an enemy, and, as men
are inclined to do in a tooth-and-nail so-
ciety, he tries to kill the man who is try-
ing to kill him.
" When a striker kills with a brick the
man who has taken his place, he has no
sense of wrong-doing. In the deepest
holds of his being, though he does not
reason the impulse, he has an ethical
sanction. He feels dimly that he has
justification, just as the home-defending
Boer felt, though more sharply, with each
bullet he fired at the invading English.
Behind every brick thrown by a striker
is the selfish ' will to live ' of himself and
the slightly altruistic will to live of his
family. The family-group came into the
world before the state-group, and society
being still on the primitive basis of tooth
and nail, the will to live of the state is
not so compelling to the striker as the
will to live of his family and himself."
Mr. London scientifically clears up
the moral character of the Scab, gener-
jusly including most of us in his diagno-
sis. He shows that, however we may
appear to the casual observer, we are all
Scabs by turn, and that, though out-
wardly we often seem to be generous,
we are really true at heart to the prin-
ciple of Natural Selection. Concerning
each one of us, he remarks, " He does
not scab because he wants to scab. No
whim of the spirit, no burgeoning of the
heart, leads him to give more of his labor-
power than they for a certain sum.
"It is because he cannot get work on
the same terms as they that he is a Scab.
. . . Nobody desires to scab, to give most
for least. The ambition of every indi-
vidual is quite the opposite."
I pass over the argument by which
Mr. London goes on to show that every-
body, except King Edward and a few
people whom hereditary advantage has
rescued from the real struggle of life, is
at times a Scab, — the laborer, the cap-
italist, the merchant, the minister of the
gospel, the American nation, the English
nation, — in short, every human organ-
ism which is in this competitive war-
fare plays by turn the part of Scab, ac-
cording as the strategy of its situation
requires. We work for less pay to get
control of the situation, but having once
got control of the situation we use it to
crush the Scab, reduce competition, and
secure larger returns.
Now I have quoted these two writers
because they are representative. Not
only have they carefully studied the or-
ganization of society, but they clearly
reflect the illumination of that philoso-
phy which, more than any other, is the
distinguishing and magisterial equip-
ment of our day. It is by the light of
Evolution that we feel qualified to test'
the Bible, Christianity, and, in fact, every
human belief or moral position. For
Evolution is to the popular scientific
mind so absolutely established as to seem
approximately identical with the cosmos
itself. It is therefore a final and author-
itative test. It is evident at a glance
that both these writers have studied our
724
The Great Delusion of our Time.
social problems by the light of Natural
Selection, and that this is to their minds
the only light worth considering. This
fact classifies them as distinctively men
of the type referred to by John Fiske.
They are, according to him, separated
from the men whose education ended in
eighteen hundred and thirty by an im-
mensely wider gulf than has ever before
divided one progressive generation of
men from their predecessors. For Nat-
ural Selection is the authoritative type
of Evolution so far as living organisms
are concerned, and Evolution is our dis-
tinctive magisterial equipment. Scien-
tific observation existed before our time,
but it is our peculiar glory to have dis-
covered the scientific philosophy which
appears to coordinate, account for, and
interpret all known facts past and pre-
sent, and which has therefore suggested
the idea of an apparently absolute yet
purely intellectual criterion of truth and
test of reality.
Moreover, these writers are consistent ;
they follow their logic to the bitter end.
They do not mix things up. Natural
Selection, which works through death, fig-
ures in their scheme as the sole law of
human development. It is Nature's de-
cree. " Dreams of peace are an illu-
sion." — " Human destiny has been
wrought out through blood." — " Com-
mon sense teaches us that as has been the
past so will be the future." — That con-
demns The Hague Tribunal to the Limbo
of hopeless phantasms. It exposes the
folly of our modern attempts to mitigate
the ferocity of war. We are but trifling
with an irresistible force ; ferocity and
murderous cunning are always Nature's
tools, by which she shapes not only our
physical, but our ethical manhood.
This, then, is the way in which the
magisterial doctrine solves -our social
problems, and this is the present social
status of the age which has basked in its
light, which " has been suddenly, almost
abruptly, raised to a higher plane than
that upon which the race had proceeded
from the days of the primitive troglodyte
to the days of our great-grandfathers."
Let us take account of stock. We have
society actually organized to-day on a
primitive tooth-and-nail basis. " From
the humblest peasant to the mightiest em-
pire humanity is waging a ceaseless and
pitiless struggle for existence in which the
unfit perish," a struggle in which " suc-
cess is attained not only by endurance and
sagacity, but by cunning and ferocity."
In fact, we are, according to Mr. Lon-
don's article, already passing some im-
portant milestones on the backward road
toward the moral status of the primitive
troglodyte. " When a striker kills with
a brick the man who has taken his place,
he has no sense of wrong-doing. . . . He
has an ethical sanction. . . . The fam-
ily-group came into the world before the
state-group, and society being still on the
primitive basis of tooth and nail, the will
to live of the state is not so compelling to
the striker as the will to live of his fam-
ily and himself." Now, as Mr. Adams
would say, common sense teaches us
whither this points. If the family-group
existed before the state-group, then fam-
ily needs existed before state or reli-
gious ordinances. " Thou shalt not steal."
" Thou shalt not kill." What are these
belated requirements of social conven-
tion compared to the necessities of the
family development ! If a brother clergy-
man draws away your congregation, re-
duces your salary, and so compels your
children to go barefoot, why not knock
him on the head ! This is troglodytism,
if the present writer understands the
word, and he thinks that he does. It
solves the social question by disintegrat-
ing society, and the singular fact is that
Natural Selection, which is supposed to
be the principle operating in moral de-
velopment, which is, in fact, identical with
the cosmic order, should have led us back
in a kind of blind-man's waltz, till we
have, according to these writers, actually
reached the primitive tooth-and-nail basis,
from which, according to modern science,
The Great Delusion of our Time.
725
we started hundreds of thousands of years
ago ; and that we should have reached
the lowest point thus far under the guid-
ance of an age whose intellectual gran-
deur dwarfs all others.
No doubt every optimist in the country
will declare that this is a stalwart mis-
representation of the present facts, but
if a sober-minded man considers the pre-
sent aspect of the labor question, the po-
litical situation in New York, Chicago,
St. Louis, and our other great cities, the
enormous development of graft, the thiev-
ish character of our new methods of
finance, the fact that the small investor
is to-day, like the man of scriptural
times who traveled between Jerusalem
and Jericho, sure to fall among thieves
unless personally conducted ; if he re-
flects on the Standard Oil operations and
the Turkish situation and the impotency
of our modern civilization to put a stop
to lynching, or to prevent such a fearful
catastrophe as war between Japan and
Russia, he is forced to confess that there
is, after all, too much truth in this dark
picture, and that our conduct is quite often
on the tooth-and-nail basis.
But there is nothing new about this ;
it is the old story of a wicked world
which always moves in a circle, which
needs salvation, which cannot save itself
because it cannot make steady moral ad-
vancement, which builds empires only
that they may perish under the weight
of their moral corruption. It is the old
humanum est errare, out of which grew
that conviction of sin, that cry to Hea-
ven for help, which since the time of
the Vedas has echoed out of every quar-
ter of the globe, from the heart of bur-
dened humanity. The Troglodyte we
have always with us ; like the Wan-
dering Jew, he never dies. His charac-
teristics are always the same ; he takes
a few steps forward, and then turns back
toward the tiger and the ape. But he
never becomes either tiger or ape. He
becomes what we call a fiend, or, in
modern day parlance, a degenerate. He
is always arguing plausibly for the tooth-
and-nail ethics, always ignoring its limi-
tations, always confounding the lines at
which a higher principle should take con-
trol. He is always putting the struggle
for a livelihood before honor and right.
How many there are of him we never
know, though we always try to find out
before election day. Often he lives in
high places, and very often he succeeds
in organizing society. He always con-
trols a great many votes. He has a
kind of primitive logic which takes hold
of men with a sort of cosmic force. Be-
hind him is the stern fact that man has
an animal nature, that this animal nature
is without doubt engaged in a severe
struggle for physical existence, that Nat-
ural Selection, like Gravitation, really
has a grip on him. In short, it is the old
story of the world, the flesh, and the
devil, apparently, though not really,
backed up by the cosmos itself. It is
the same world which Socrates faced,
and Jesus, and Paul. Righteous men
have faced it in all ages and feared not.
Often it has quailed before their rebuke.
It has recognized an authority higher
than intellect, greater than that of phys-
ical nature, and has cried out, " We
have sinned ! " The only difference in
our own time is that we have noble-
hearted and high-minded men, not at all
troglodytes as to their personal conduct
or ideals, who, writing with the magis-
terial authority vaguely supposed to be
possessed by our modern science, delib-
erately acquit the wicked world. True,
it is cruel, it is brutal ; they would be
ashamed, as high-minded gentlemen, to
act on such principles, yet they declare
with the finality of absolute truth that
the world cannot act otherwise ; it is
simply carrying out Nature's decree.
The peculiar feature, then, of our times
is, not that the world is on a primitive
tooth-and-nail basis, but that it stands
acquitted, nay, justified, by a verdict ap-
parently based upon the doctrine of Evo-
lution, and that conscience is discrecl-
726
The Great Delusion of our Time.
ited and put out of court by the apparent
authority of those standards which have
given us a supreme and magisterial posi-
tion among the ages. The Troglodyte
now has an unassailable backer in the
scholar who sits on a judgment seat
higher than that of Moses, and who says
to the world, " You have no grounds
for crying, 'peccavij' you have not
sinned ; you are doing just right ; you
are debtor to the flesh to live after the
flesh. It is Nature's decree, not that
you should be a brother to your neigh-
bor, but that you should rob him and
fight him for a livelihood."
Words would fail to tell how, from
the time when Darwin's and Spencer's
philosophies were published, this magis-
terial tendency has proceeded to assist
the Troglodyte in cheapening character,
by its judicial decisions based on the
evolutionary hypothesis. It has not only
enabled our primitive friend to throw
bricks with greater cheerfulness, but it
has made his creed impregnable ; nay,
it has enabled him to make all other
creeds look foolish. The Troglodyte al-
ways believed that preachers of right-
eousness retained the claw-foot under
their shoes and stockings. He knew
that prophets and apostles only waited
for a chance to show their teeth. His
intuition told him that generous people
were really scabbing when they went
about doing good. He saw by a kind
of cosmic light that those great ideals
upon which our higher morality fed were
silly dreams. His reason told him that
the power which makes for righteousness
was a sun-god, or a highly developed
form of ghost worship, or a fetish, due
to the effect of environment. He always
understood that the moral nature itself
was a product of circumstance without
the least atom of final authority, a kind
of vermiform appendix which were best
removed, since its place has been super-
seded by the exact knowledge of the cos-
mic law. Why should a man longer be
punched by conscience when he has risen
to an understanding of Nature's decree ?
What do we want of morals when reason
has become supreme ? All this the Trog-
lodyte knew in his heart, but he was a
little shy of telling it because the stal-
wart moralists had the ear of public
opinion. Now, behold a Daniel come to
judgment, who has not only confirmed
his suspicions, proved his creed, and
made him a prophet of the cosmos, but
has made the stalwart moralists them-
selves give up the validity of their moral
perceptions, while they try to explain that
their opinions were really based on Evo-
lution.
If our primitive friend has any sense
of humor, his sides must shake over this
last performance, for it has made him
look not only honest, but authoritative.
It has stimulated a natural passion for
his primitive ideals, and it has taken the
wind out of some of his opponents.
Their voice is not as clear, nor their pre-
sence as distinguishable, nor is the mass
of people as much interested in them.
In fact, the popular interest leans toward
animalism ; the animal cuts more figure
than the spiritual. The scientific moral-
ists are thinking their case over ; many
of them are still trying to patch it up
with Evolution. They have not yet
dreamed of falling back upon the valid-
ity of the moral perception itself. And
there are a great many people who want
to be good, but have lost faith in their
moral ideals, and are humbly looking to
the scientists and the philosophers for
their moral nutriment. As to the pro-
phets and apostles, their voice is still
and small in the ear of a moral nature
whose main study it is to supply practi-
cal ethics enough to make business pros-
perous and the governing party secure.
Now Mr. Huxley long ago discovered
the blunder that had been made in ap-
plying the theory of Natural Selection to
Social Evolution. He saw that the c
mic light had failed at this point, an
he introduced a variation as follows :
"There is another fallacy which seems
The Great Delusion of our Time.
727
to me to pervade the so-called ' Ethics
of Evolution.' It is the notion that, be-
cause, on the whole, animals and plants
have advanced in perfection of organi-
zation by means of the struggle for ex-
istence and the consequent survival of
the fittest, therefore men in society, men
as ethical beings, must look to the same
process to help them toward perfection.
Social progress means a checking of the
cosmic process at every step, and the
substitution for it of another which may
be called the ethical process. What we
call goodness or virtue involves a course
of conduct which in all respects is op-
posed to that which leads to success in
the cosmic struggle for existence. In
place of ruthless self-assertion it demands
self-restraint, in place of thrusting aside
or treading down all competitors it re-
quires that the individual shall not merely
respect, but shall help his fellows. Its
influence is directed not so much to the
survival of the fittest, as to the fitting
of as many as possible to survive. It re-
pudiates what we call the gladiatorial
theory of existence. Laws and moral
precepts are directed to the end of curb-
ing the cosmic process and reminding
the individual of his duty to the com-
munity, to the protection and interest of
which he owes, if not existence itself, at
least the life of something better than a
brutal savage."
Mr. Huxley made this discovery just
as any one of us might, by a simple
common-sense observation of human na-
ture as it works practically. He did not,
however, sympathetically observe all the
phenomena involved, and he excluded
some of them for this reason. So that
his theory of Social Evolution never
could claim magisterial authority, simply
because it is incomplete. It is no doubt
a profound discovery that the altruistic
principle conserves and builds up human
society, while antagonism disintegrates
it ; that love conquers, overrules, and
fructifies the lower competitive forces, as
animal life conquers, overrules, and fruc-
tifies chemical affinity or gravitation in
organic development. But it was not
original with Mr. Huxley ; thousands of
people had seen and applied it before he
was born. Jesus was the real discoverer ;
He first mastered the social or ethical
principle. He found it to be universal good
neighborhood or brotherhood, traced it
to its source in God's fatherhood, flooded
i
it with the Divine affection, put it into
his own self-sacrificing life, and showed
us how we might practically attain to it
through his help. Since then the idea has
been symbolized by the Cross of Christ,
and has for eighteen centuries been re-
garded as the Christian solution, though
Christendom has too often been antago-
nistic to it.
Mr. Huxley asserted that this ethical
process must be substituted for the cos-
mic process. Jesus and Paul declared
it to be the supreme force in the cosmic
process itself. Mr. Huxley's trouble
was that he, too, fell under the great de-
lusion of fancying that this philosophic
form of truth was the final and ultimate
one, and, therefore, he identified Natu-
ral Selection with the cosmic process it-
self ; but when he followed his new light
he lost his magisterial authority over
the high church evolutionists ; and they
are, to-day, barking at the same old tree
up which they suppose their truth has
climbed, though it has gone out of sight.
But, whichever theory is correct, could
there be a greater delusion than this
sense of magistracy ? Have we anything
to back it up? Have we any theory on
any subject which is universally accept-
ed or can be reckoned as a final and
absolute form of knowledge ? Philoso-
phy is surely an enormous help to both
intellectual and moral perception, but is it
possible to have a philosophy that can take
the place of perception ? And if it were
possible, what would become of percep-
tion, and of individuality, and of genius,
and of inventive discovery under such a
predetermining influence ? I would not
be understood for a moment as holding
728
The Great Delusion of our Time.
these writers whom I have quoted as re-
sponsible for this tendency. We are all
infected. We all take turns at it. Let
us say that it is the Zeitgeist that has
done it, and shake hands all around. It
was Count Ito who said that when he
was preparing the Japanese Constitution
he tried to think how Buddha would
look at the matter, (and he added, " I
think that I did succeed fairly well in
getting into his skin." It might be worth
while if some of us would occasionally
try to get outside the epidermis of our
so-called modern thought, and take a
straight look at the age from an exterior
point of view ; it need not be so far off
as Buddha, but sufficiently remote to af-
ford a good perspective. It is quite pos-
sible that from such a clear, cool height
of vision our generation might seem to
be, like Nebuchadnezzar, a little touched
in the head. I have selected these writers
because they are strictly logical, and, un-
like some of us, they do not straddle.
They take the most authoritative type of
Evolution, the one which most deserves
to be regarded as Nature's decree, the
one which Mr. Huxley styles the cosmic
process, the only type of philosophy which
could at the present day by any possi-
bility be exalted to the rank of a final
standard, and they think it out to the
bitter end. If we have any clear cosmic
torch, this is the one. They hold it high
and wave it wide. By its illumination
we see the column of humanity with re-
versed arms turning its back on all the
great ideals toward which it has crawled
upward in the space of a hundred thou-
sand years or so, cheapening the moral
nature, and marching back without con-
viction of sin toward the original homun-
culus. This is a dark picture, certainly.
True, if we remove this cosmic torch
things do not look so dark. There are
at least as many people to-day as ever
working for the interests of righteous-
ness and peace and human brotherhood.
They make fewer practical blunders,
they keep the issues clearer, they utilize
the results of science, they bring to the
task a broader scientific knowledge, a
profounder sympathy for human condi-
tions, a greater willingness to look at all
sides. Witness President Eliot's noble
contribution to a better understanding
between labor and capital. These peo-
ple are putting up a stout fight for the
moral nature, and they meet with much
success among plain folk. They vitalize
character, for the moral nature feeds upon
revelations and ideals as the body feeds
upon bread. But the great difficulty
with these people is that they are all
fools. This does not mean that they are
obliged to have guardians appointed over
them ; in reality, many of them are guar-
dians of the commonwealth or commu-
nity to which they belong. They are not
dull in practical affairs ; their foolish-
ness consists in the fact that all their
high ideals and inspirations rest upon a
so-called semi - mythical or subliminal
basis which they cannot prove before this
infallible tribunal that has indorsed our
friend the Troglodyte. They cannot
make their articles of faith square with
any specific type of evolutionary doctrine,
or prove their revelations to the latest
type of scholarship. Our magisterial au-
thorities are withholding a verdict on
their case until the Society of Psychical
Research has finished its investigations.
This lack of intellectual status gives
them a phantasmal appearance, which
probably caused Mr. London and Mr.
Adams to overlook them altogether. In-
deed, one frequently hears in intellectual
circles the statement that no one to-day
believes in such articles of faith. But
it is the fools who bring practical light
to the social question. They do not stop
to square things with Evolution, they do
not wait for the Society of Psychical
Research, they do not ask how things
originated. They simply look at the
problem in hand. They have one su-
preme authority, — it is moral perception
assisted by science. It is made keen by
practical use, and clear by walking in the
The Great Delusion of our Time.
729
light of the highest ideals. They and
they alone see the value of the moral
organism ; they see that its supreme or-
ganic law is love. They see that there
is a power behind it, a power which
makes for righteousness, and that it has
its supreme embodiment in the Gospel of
Christ. They see the importance of the
struggle for bread. Their heart goes out
with sympathy for those who are in that
struggle ; they themselves are in it, and
they know what it means. They know
the sinister outlook of the cosmic order ;
they have felt its dread temptation.
They know the bitterness of defeat in
battle. Through long ages they have
maintained this fight, not for a system of
ethics, but for the worth and deliverance
of the moral nature itself. Often they
have felt the tooth and nail, ay, the beak
and the claw of a degenerate civilization.
Often they have been brought before
magistrates, robbed of their goods, deliv-
ered unto death. Always they have ap-
peared to be opposing the cosmic or-
der, always they have been called fools
for their exaggerated valuation of the
moral nature. And yet to them it has
always appeared to be the one great re-
ality of this life, the soul of humanity, the
offspring of the gods, the heir of a life
beyond the grave, the bond of a human
brotherhood. For all human suffering
there seemed to be compensation if only
this higher manhood were not debased,
but for moral defeat there was no com-
pensation. Therefore, to deliver this
moral nature they have dared the worst.
Often single-handed, poor, friendless,
struggling for daily bread against mighty
odds, they have yet found courage to go
forward, chanting, as they marched, their
battle hymn : —
Let goods and kindred go,
This mortal life also.
The body they may kill,
God's truth abideth still.
His kingdom is forever.
There is something in this estimate that
awakens a response in humanity ; it
touches a lost chord. It is no vague in-
tuition ; it is the testimony of the moral
constitution itself, and it appeals to the
moral consciousness in every one of us. It
is backed up by the logic of life. It is
like the testimony of the elm tree when
it tells us that it must have sunlight and
air for its top, and moisture and earth for
its roots. It is by this authority that the
fools speak and act. Not always have
they understood ; often they have been
beguiled into thinking that their real au-
thority was a dogma or a theology. Then
they have ceased to be fools ; they have
become magisterial, and have crushed
their religious geniuses and killed their
prophets. Often they have fancied that
they have eliminated the element of mys-
tery from ethics, and established morals
on a basis of scientific logic ; and then
they have lost their dynamic force. Now
and then there has been a fool who has
understood, and his voice has shaken the
world. For every great leader of men,
whose trumpet note has rallied the army
of righteousness, and led it to victory,
has been face to face with the power
that makes for righteousness, so that he
could say with one of old, " I have heard
of thee by the hearing of the ear : but
now mine eye seeth thee."
In his Social Evolution Mr. Kidd at-
tributes all our upward march to the
fools. He has, however, an euphemism
for them ; he calls their ideals and inspi-
rations supra-rational. If he is correct,
history actually resolves itself into one
supreme battlefield. It is the fight of
the moral nature, first for survival, then
for conquest, through the power of its
supra-rational ideals. But whether or not
Mr. Kidd be right concerning the past,
there is surely but one battle to-day. On
its outcome hangs the fate of all our in-
stitutions and of our individual souls. It
is the battle of the fools. And there is
but one great question to-day, namely,
whether we will cling to our magisterial
tendency, or join the fools and accept the
validity of the moral perceptions.
John H. Denison.
730
Trolley Competition with the Railroads.
TROLLEY COMPETITION WITH THE RAILROADS.
IT is barely eight years since street
railroads have outgrown the horse-car
period, and have required the use of
the word " interurban " to describe the
enlargement of their field of traffic .
The electric installations of the early
nineties served their purpose in a mea-
sure, and were in many cases attended
by extensions of the local traction lines,
but their competition with steam rail-
roads was entirely negligible until after
1895. The year 1895 is a landmark
in the history of electric roads ; prior
to that time it may be broadly said that
the street railroad system of each city
was an independent unit, organized
•with the sole object of carrying pas-
sengers from one part of town to an-
other, and with a remote interest, if
any interest at all, in traffic centring
outside the city limits. The possibil-
ities to be achieved by running electric
cars at moderately high speed along
ten or fifteen mile stretches of country
roads, deriving both a local and a spe-
cies of through business by coupling
up adjacent cities and towns, came, as
a result of improvements in the art,
suddenly into view, and a series of ex-
tensive additions to existing lines were
planned or begun, radiating out far and
wide from the original confines of the
city limits and the adjacent suburbs.
It may perhaps be questioned whe-
ther the steam railroads were really as
slow as they appeared to be in realiz-
ing that in this interurban development
they would shortly have to face novel
and strongly fortified competition. The
electric roads were spreading, and there
was no obvious way to prevent them
from doing so. Early attempts at com-
petition were treated as isolated cases,
and it is only since 1898 that the elec-
tric roads have demanded recognition
in the field of short-haul passenger
traffic.
From 1898 through 1901 the char-
acteristic of interurban road develop-
ment was exceedingly rapid extension,
and during 1902 and 1903 there have
been considerable reorganization and
adjustment, the loose ends have been
coupled up, and extension has been
somewhat more moderate and perhaps
better directed than previously. The
government census report on electric
railroads for 1902 estimated the total
length of main track on June 30 of that
year as 16, 648 miles, as against a street
railroad mileage of 5783 in 1890.
During the twelve years, according to
the report, mileage worked by animal
power decreased 95 per cent ; by cable
power, 51 per cent, and by steam power,
76 per cent, while electric working in-
creased 1637 per cent.
In spite of the construction and con-
nection of interurban electric lines to
form through routes fifty miles or more
in length, their profitable territory still
lies about a series of centres, and it is
worthy of note that these centres are not
cities of the first magnitude, and doubt-
less never will be. The interurban
traffic about New York is carried by the
steam roads, because the congestion in
the streets is too great to permit any
extended use of cars that must thread
their way through eight or ten miles of
city streets before reaching open coun-
try. Similarly, in Chicago, the Illinois
Central runs a lucrative suburban ser-
vice with cars of special type, and re-
ports that it does not feel the compe-
tition of the street cars, which nominally
compete in the service to most of the
suburban points reached, but have not
the advantage of a private right of way,
and cannot furnish rapid transit in its
true meaning. It is a primary neces-
sity in the suburban traffic of a great city
that rapidly moving cars shall not oc-
cupy the same thoroughfare with slow
Trolley Competition with the Railroads.
731
moving cars and vehicles, and the cost
of securing suitable terminals and en-
trances into such a city effectively shuts
out any sporadic competition. Rail-
roads such as the proposed New York
& Portchester, which is endeavoring
to build a twenty-four mile suburban
line out of New York city, electrically
equipped, connecting with the Rapid
Transit Subway, scarcely come within
the scope of the present study, but are
rather to be classed with the elevated
and underground lines of great cities as
portions of a purely local system, dif-
fering from interurban roads in general
in the vital characteristic that they do
not enter the city at grade, or receive
and discharge passengers in the streets
at street level.
The maximum effect of electric com-
petition at the present period is felt in
localities where there are groups of
prosperous cities and towns within a
radius of from ten to forty miles of one
another ; and this competition is in some
cases so successful that the steam rail-
roads have lost practically their entire
local short-haul traffic, while the elec-
tric roads have created for themselves
a business not merely greater than the
entire traffic that previously existed,
but many times greater. In 1895 the
Lake Shore & Michigan Southern car-
ried 104,426 westbound and 98,588
eastbound passengers between Cleve-
land and Oberlin, Ohio, thirty-four
miles west, and intermediate points.
The competition of the electric roads,
which at this time had commenced build-
ing a network of lines around Cleveland,
was so severe, that in 1896 the steam
road carried 68,000 passengers less,
between the points named, and in 1902
carried a total of 91,761, as against
203, 014, seven years before. Between
Cleveland and Painesville, twenty-nine
miles, and intermediate points, the Lake
Shore & Michigan Southern carried a
total of 199,292, or an average of 16,-
608 a month in 1895, and 28, 708, or an
average of 2392 a month, in 1902.
In other words, the steam road carried
more passengers in two months, during
the formative period of the electric lines,
than it did in a year, after they were
completed and had developed their traf-
fic between the competitive points.
The following table summarizes these
results, showing the surprising traffic
losses which the steam roads have sus-
tained. The lower average fare on the
New York, Chicago & St. Louis indi-
cates the effort made by that company
to compete with the electric road for
the business, but the falling off in num-
ber of passengers carried shows how
futile this effort has been.
LAKE SHORE & MICHIGAN SOUTHERN.
PASSENGERS CARRIED BETWEEN CLEVELAND
AND OBEKLXN, AND INTERMEDIATE POINTS.
Average
Westbound. Eastbound. Total. per month.
1895 104,426 98,588 203,014 16,918
1902 46,328 45,433 91,761 7,647
PASSENGERS CARRIED BETWEEN CLEVELAND
AND PAINESVILLE AND INTERME-
DIATE POINTS.
Average
Westbound. Eastbound. Total. per month.
1895
1902
97,460
13,106
101,832
15,602
199,292
28,708
16,608
2,392
NEW YORK, CHICAGO & ST. LOUIS.
PASSENGERS CARRIED BETWEEN CLEVELAND
AND LORAIN.
Average
Total Passengers.
1895 42,526
1902 9,795
Revenue. Revenue.
$25,523 60 c.
4,379 44 c.
It is to be regretted that the electric
lines do not keep their records in such
a shape that an exact parallel can be
drawn, comparing their gains with the
losses of the steam roads. The Cleve-
land, Elyria & Western kept such rec-
ords for a time with considerable care,
but discontinued the practice because it
involved too much bookkeeping. Hence
it is only possible to show the traffic
over the entire system, which goes be-
yond Oberlin to Norwalk and other
points, reaching practically the same
cities and towns that the Lake Shore
& Michigan Southern reaches, together
732
Trolley Competition with the Railroads.
with some additional ones. In 1902,
the electric road carried approximate-
ly three million passengers ; well over
three times as many as were carried in
1899, while the steam road, recovering
from its low-water mark of. 71,755,
carried 91,761. Although the com-
parison is only approximate, on account
of the additional points reached by the
electric road, it at least serves to show
what has become of the short-haul traf-
fic.
The really significant part of such
figures is not the traffic lost by the steam
roads, but the entirely new traffic cre-
ated by the electric lines, seemingly out
of nothing. The results which followed
the opening of the Detroit, Ypsilanti,
Ann Arbor & Jackson electric road be-
tween Detroit and Ann Arbor furnish a
striking example of this. Ann Arbor
is forty miles from Detroit, on the line
of the Michigan Central Railroad, and
had at the last census a population of
less than 15,000, exclusive of the large
transient residence at the University
of Michigan. Before the electric road
was built, the purely local business of
the Michigan Central between Detroit
and Ann Arbor was estimated at about
two hundred passengers a day. During
the first summer after it was opened, the
electric road averaged approximately
four thousand passengers a day between
the same points, and although some part
of this travel was doubtless due to nov-
elty, the steady winter and summer busi-
ness of the electric line has been run-
ning from ten to twenty times as great
as the maximum traffic ever enjoyed by
the Michigan Central.
These surprising increases in what
may be called the visible business of
a locality are due in part to the exten-
sion of the suburban residential terri-
tory of each city, following improved
means of getting "there and back."
But the entirely new feature which the
intemrban roads have introduced into
the traffic situation is the promotion of
what may be called the traveling habit.
There are citizens of New England to-
day who can remember when prayers
were offered in the churches for the
hardy traveler of Boston who proposed
to undertake a trip to New York ; steam
communication has lessened tenfold the
minimum amount of urgency which
would induce a trip of a hundred miles,
but it has remained for the electric road
to keep people constantly traveling short
distances, impelled by motives which
would not have been sufficient to start
them, even five years ago. A twenty-
mile journey on a steam railroad re-
quires as much preparation as a two-
hundred-mile journey, but the interur-
ban car, leisurely traversing the streets
of the town to collect its passengers, at
frequent intervals, is such a convenient,
lazy way of getting around that it seems
not to require much in the way of plans
or of packing. To choose between the
morning train at 8. 13 and the afternoon
train at 3.57 required decision, to catch
the train required forethought; while
nowadays, if at 10 A. M. it seems casu-
ally advisable to go to Jonesport, all
that is necessary is to wait for the
hourly interurban car to pass the door.
It has been proved repeatedly that
these elements of convenient access and
frequent service are more of an attrac-
tion than the lower rate of fare, al-
though in some localities where local
railroad rates had been high, the con-
siderable reductions made by the elec-
tric roads have seemed to the commu-
nity to constitute a bargain in transpor-
tation, so that people traveled frequently
and perhaps needlessly, through a feel-
ing that they were saving money. Fares
on the interurban lines are seldom in
excess of two cents a mile, and usual-
ly amount to about a cent and a half,
for round trip tickets, where local rail-
road rates ranged, before the opening
of the competition, from two and a half
to four cents a mile.
The steam railroads vary greatly in
their attitude toward electric competi-
tion, but it has been almost the uniform
Trolley Competition with the Railroads.
733
experience of railroad managers, East
and West, that rate cuts to meet electric
competition are quite futile. Electric
transportation handles traffic in small
units. The power house is the locomo-
tive, and it can haul ten single cars as •
easily as it can a train of ten cars
coupled together, — more easily, in fact.
But in steam service, to reverse the fig-
ure of speech, each transportation unit
must have its own power house. Dis-
regarding technical refinements, it may
be said that it would cost a steam rail-
road five times as much to run an hour-
ly, single-car train during a fifteen-hour
day as it would to run three five-car
trains. That is the primary reason on
the side of absolute cost which makes
it impossible for a steam road to com-
pete with an electric road for light short-
haul traffic.
But the peculiar difference in the
legal status of the two kinds of trans-
portation gives the electric roads an
advantage far greater. The charter of
a steam railroad requires private right
of way, fenced in, with a problem to be
met in the ultimate disposition of every
town or city grade crossing. The elec-
tric road buys, begs, or steals a fran-
chise which permits it to run on the
side of the highway, except where it
better suits its convenience to go across
lots, and then by a sort of Jekyll and
Hyde transformation, the car that just
now dashed across the country in the
guise of a locomotive, proceeds sleepily
down the main street in the character
of a street car. No steam railroad can
build a terminal to compete with service
of this character, in the inducements
it offers to a public which is willing to
travel, but does not have to.
What, then, should be the attitude
of a steam road toward its electric
competitors ? The best opinion seems
to be that it should leave them alone,
so far as direct competition is concerned.
The traveling habit that the electric
roads further does not confine itself to
their own lines, and the steam roads
find that their alert rivals are coming
more and more to act as feeders for
long-haul business, which is the natural
and profitable traffic of a steam railroad.
The interurban car which collects pas-
sengers in country hamlets, and marshals
them at the larger stations of the steam
railroad, performs a service similar to
that of a local car line within a city. An
officer of one of the large Eastern rail-
roads much subject to the competition
of electric roads estimates that although
his company loses about sixty-five per
cent of its local short-haul business as
soon as the interurban competition be-
comes active, the lost earnings all come
back again in the form of new through
business. This statement, however,
applies only to main line competition ;
the effect of an electric parallel on a
branch line must be considered sepa-
rately.
The passenger earnings and economic
services of a branch line arise in part
from short-haul local business originat-
ing and terminating on the branch, and
in part from the services of the branch
as a feeder for the main line. The
interurban line is certain to take the
short-haul business, or at least the pro-
fit of it, and itself performs the other
part of the work, that of a main line
feeder. Hence much of the most bit-
ter competition has been in branch line
territory, as, for example, along the shore
of Lake Ontario, east of Rochester,
where the Rome, Watertown & Ogdens-
burg branch of the New York Central
has made an ineffectual effort to keep its
passenger business away from the Roch-
ester & Sodus Bay electric line, with-
in the forty-mile competitive radius.
The steam road runs from half to three
quarters of a mile from the centre of
the towns along the route ; the electric
road uses the highway for the greater
part of the distance, and runs down the
main streets. The cars have a baggage
compartment, and make a special feature
of delivering the trunks of commercial
travelers at the doors of the local hotels,
734
Trolley Competition with the Hailroads.
saving the cost of transfer, and al-
though the electric road charges slight-
ly higher fares than the steam road, it
gets prohably ninety per cent of the
business.
The only apparent way for steam rail-
roads to manage electric competition is
through control, or partial control, of
the territory. The New York, New
Haven & Hartford, with a local business
unique in its importance when the ex-
tent of the system is considered, has
done some pioneer work in this direction,
working in general to secure links which
will prevent the welding together of the
diversified electric lines in New England
into competing parallels. Electrifica-
tion of portions of the steam roadbed has
also been tried on the New Haven road,
and is just now being quite extensively
experimented with in England, where
it might almost be said that all the pas-
senger traffic is local, in view of its con-
trolling importance. The line of the
Mersey Company, converted from steam
to electric traction last May, was the
first instance of this in Great Britain;
on September 27 last, the first electric
train was run over one of the Newcastle'
lines of the North Eastern, and electri-
fication of the Lancashire & Yorkshire
between Liverpool and Southport is now
in progress.
But although transportation can be
economically conducted in small units,
on an electrified steam railroad, the
tremendous advantage possessed by elec-
tric roads through their terminal facil-
ities in the city streets is not affected,
and still leaves the interurban roads in
a competitive position which is almost
unassailable. The alternative method
of setting a rogue to catch a rogue,
and building independent electric lines
where needed to take care of competi-
tors in the same field, and to act as main
line feeders at the same time, seems
more promising. Such lines, besides
building up the territory, bringing
business to the steam railroad, and con-
stituting a defense, should be able, in
most cases, to take care of themselves
and earn an independent profit.
The freight and express business done
by interurban roads has been a separate
growth, starting somewhat later than
the passenger business. There is still
a wide divergence of opinion among
electric railroad managers as to the ex-
pediency of trying to develop anything
more than a limited package service.
The Rochester & Sodus Bay road main-
tains a regular freight service, handling
such bulky articles as coal and lumber
in five-car trains, and believes in it,
while the Detroit United lines, aggre-
gating some three hundred miles of in-
terurban trackage, hold the opposite
view, and take only a slight interest in
light package business, refusing to haul
heavy freight at all. The most ration-
al point of view is probably that ex-
pressed by the president of the Detroit,
Ypsilanti, Ann Arbor & Jackson road,
who believes that interurban lines have
a useful and legitimate field in collect-
ing and delivering all kinds of package
freight, and even garden truck and
milk, in the rural districts, but that
freight business ceases to be profitable
to an electric road as soon as it begins
in any way to retard or interfere with
passenger traffic. Even apart from the
matter of interference with the steady
business of the road, a trolley line is as
ill adapted to move freight trains in
large units as a steam railroad is for
handling light local passenger traffic in
small units. But certain electric roads,
such as the Hudson Valley, running
north from Troy, the Cleveland lines,
and others, have been very aggressive in
their package freight business, running
express cars several times daily, and
instituting a system of free collection
and delivery in wagons. Here again,
by the combined elements of low rate,
frequent service, and flexibility in the
place and manner of collection and de-
livery, the electric roads have in many
cases been able to secure almost the
entire business of a locality, and to
Trolley Competition with the Railroads.
735
build up noteworthy increases in it as
well.
The aggressiveness of electric rail-
road managers in solving new problems
rapidly, without precedents to guide
them, has led to great divergences in
the practice of different localities, and
to certain "freak " developments. The
term is used in the naturalistic sense,
and not as implying ridicule, for while
some of the efforts have doubtless been
ill considered, others are valuable pi-
oneer work in the field of experimenta-
tion. Among such developments, be-
sides the electric freight trains in north-
ern New York state may be mentioned
the sleeping-car service out of Indianap-
olis, and the fast specials from Detroit.
Sleeping-cars have been ordered at In-
dianapolis, to be run over the electric
roads to Columbus, 181 miles away, on
the theory that they will secure traf-
fic by offering to passengers a full
night's sleep between these points, and
relative freedom from noise and dirt.
The company believes, perhaps right-
ly, that it has thus solved the problem
of how to travel comfortably between
cities too far apart to permit a business
man to take time for the journey by day,
and yet so near together that the pas-
senger traveling in the sleeping-car on
a steam railroad must either go to bed
very late or get up very early. The
electric cars will take all night for the
trip, and there will be no cinders to
drift in at open windows, in the sum-
mer time.
The Detroit specials are interesting
as an experiment in high speed along
the highway, where there is no protec-
tion against stray dogs or cattle on the
track, and no safeguarding of grade
crossings. Between Detroit and Port
Huron, seventy-four miles, two specials
run daily in each direction, stopping at
only six intervening points, and making
the distance in two hours and thirty-
seven minutes. The average running
time of these specials is thus nearly
thirty miles an hour; accommodation
trains on the New Haven road between
New York and New Haven take practi-
cally the same time in running an iden-
tical distance. A similar service is
maintained to Flint, sixty-eight miles,
in two hours and a half. On portions
of the run, between stops, the cars reach
a speed of upwards of forty miles an
hour. Rates on the specials are some-
what lower than by the steam railroad ;
the service is popular, and has been free
from accidents, although the speed is
fully as great as that of most express
trains of a few decades ago.
Perhaps the most serious difficulty
which now confronts the interurban
roads of the country is the prevalent
over-capitalization. In view of the
rapid gains in traffic following every
move in extension, inflation has been
easy, and new business has for the time
covered up unsound financial methods.
In Massachusetts, where the railroad
commission has full powers, and has
done excellent work for a number of
years, the capitalization of these pro-
perties is restricted to what the com-
mission calls the fair value of replace-
ment, and now stands at $48,621, stock
and funded debt outstanding, per mile
of line. This figure is illuminating
when compared with the average capi-
talization of all the street railroads in
the country, which was $128,881 per
mile, for the year ending June 30,
1902, according to the report of the
Census Bureau. The subject is a broad
one, and discussion of it does not pro-
perly belong in an article on the com-
petitive conditions existing between
steam and electric roads, except in so
far as the stability of the latter is
threatened by the inflation. But it is
probably a safe statement that at least
half of the total average capitalization
of the electric railroads of the country
at the present time represents nothing
more than promoters' profits. Theroad-
bed and equipment of these properties
are still new, so that there is strong like-
lihood that the necessity of making a
736
The Death of Thoreau's Guide.
considerable number of simultaneous re-
newals will sooner or later arise. The
allowances out of earnings for main-
tenance and depreciation have undoubt-
edly been too small ; net earnings have
been kept as large as possible, and it is
to be feared that nothing short of ex-
traordinary traffic gains and unusually
careful management, during the next
four or five years, will keep many elec-
tric properties from urgent need of new
capital at a time when it will be exceed-
ingly hard to find.
The interurban roads have grave
problems to face. They are likely soon
to feel the restraint of the complex
legislation, both wise and unwise, which
hedges about the steam roads ; they are
certain to undergo a period of foreclo-
sure and reorganization during the next
decade. But it seems wholly logical to
expect that at the termination of read-
justments, and after extensive develop-
ment of the field and methods of elec-
tric transportation, which is still in an
elementary stage, they will become the
natural and profitable short-haul pas-
senger carriers of the country.
Bay Morris.
THE DEATH OF THOREAU'S GUIDE.
THE strangest monument a man ever
had in sacred memory, — a pair of old
boots. For a token of respect and admi-
ration, love and lasting grief, — just a
pair of old river-driver's boots hung on
the pin-knot of a pine. Big and buckled ;
bristling all over the soles with wrought
steel calks ; gashed at the toes to let the
water out ; slashed about the tops into
fringes with the tally of his season's
work, less only the day which saw him
die ; reddened by water ; cracked by
the sun, — worn-out, weather-rotting old
boots, hanging for years on the pine tree,
disturbed by no one. The river-drivers
tramped back and forth beneath them, a
red-shirted multitude ; they boated along
the pond in front and drove their logs
past, year after year ; they looked at the
tree with the big cross cut deep in its
scaly bark, and always left the boots
hanging on the limb. They were the
Governor's boots, Joe Attien's boots ;
they belonged to Thoreau's guide.1
The pine tree had seen the whole. It
was old and it was tall. Its head stretched
1 Thoreau spells the name " Aitteon ; " I have
preferred the form found on his tombstone,
" Attien," because it indicates both the pronun-
up so high that it could look over the crest
of Grand Pitch, tremendous fall though
it is, right up where Grand Falls come
churning down to their final leap into
Shad Pond. It had been looking up the
river in the sunshine of that summer
morning, and had seen the whole, — the
over-loaded boat that set out to run the
falls, the wreck in the rapids, the panic
of the crew, the men struggling among
logs and rocks, the brave attempt at res-
cue, and the dead, drowned bulk, which
had once been the Governor, as it was
tumbled down over the Grand Pitch into
the pond below. The pine tree had stood
guard over it for days, and when, after
four days in the grave of the waters, it
rose again, the pine tree still kept watch
over it, until, on the sixth morning, the
searchers found it there. " And when
they found his body, they cut a cross
into a tree by the side of the Pond, and
they hung up his boots in the tree, and
they stayed there always, because every-
body knew that they was the Governor's
boots."
elation and the derivation. For it is not Indian,
but the French Etienne, or Stephen.
The Death of Thoreau's Guide.
737
If ever Henry David Thoreau showed
himself lacking in penetration it was
when he failed to get the measure of Jo-
seph Attien. True, Joe was young then,
— he never lived to be old ; yet a man
who, dying at forty-one, is so long remem-
bered must have shown some signs of
promise at twenty-four.1 But Thoreau
hired an Indian to be aboriginal. One
who said " By George ! " and made re-
marks with a Yankee flavor, was contra-
ry to his hypothesis of what a barbarian
ought to be. It did not matter that this
was the sort of man who gave up his in-
side seat and rode sixty miles on the top
of the stage in the rain, that a woman
might be sheltered ; — all the cardinal
virtues without aboriginality would not
have sufficed Mr. Thoreau for a text.
And so he missed his opportunity to tell
us what manner of man this was. Joe
Attien's best chance of being remembered
lies, not in having been Henry Thoreau's
guide on a brief excursion, but in being
just brave, honest, upright Joseph Attien,
a man who was loved and lamented be-
cause he had the quality of goodness.
" His death just used the men all up,"
said a white river-man years afterward ;
" after that some of the best men wa'n't
good for anything all the rest of the
drive."
I could give, as I have gleaned it here
and there, the testimony to his worth, the
statements of one and another that he was
not only brave but good, an open-heart-
ed, patient, forbearing sort of a man, re-
nowned for his courage and skill in han-
dling a boat, but loved for his mild just-
ness. " He was just like a father to us,"
said a white man who had been in his
1 The newspapers said he was thirty -five
when he died, but his gravestone says plain-
ly " forty years and seven months." It is in-
teresting to learn that one who lived so well
and died so generously was born on Christmas
Day.
2 His epitaph is wrong in asserting that he
inherited the title of governor. The office had
been a life office, hereditary in the Attien
family, who were chiefs ; but at Joseph's f a-
VOL. xcin. — NO. 560. 47
boat. Thirty-three years after his death
I heard a head lumberman, who also
had served two years in his boat, a very
silent man, break out into voluble remi-
niscence at merely seeing Joe Attien's
picture. But there is a story, indispu-
tably authentic, which shows, better than
anything else, the largeness of the man.
He had been slandered by a white man,
whom he had thought his friend, in a way
which not only caused him distress of
mind, but was calculated to interfere ma-
terially with his election to the office of
tribal governor, the most coveted honor
within an Indian's grasp, and that year
elective for the first time.2 The incident
occurred just before his first election in
1862, — for he was governor seven times.
Hurt to the quick, he avoided his former
friend, yet said nothing. But as soon
as he discovered that the false accusa-
tion had arisen from a wholly innocent
and most natural mistake, without a word
in his own justification, leaving the charge
to stand undenied, he renewed the old
friendship, and his friend never knew
what just cause he had given for resent-
ment till, years after Joe's death, it was
accidentally revealed by one who had
heard the misunderstanding explained.
Such was the man.
If you ask the men who were there at
the time how Joseph Attien died, they
will never suggest that it was accident
or the hand of God. More or less em-
phatically, according to their natures
and the vividness of their recollection,
they will say right out, " Dingbat Prouty
did it ; it was Dingbat Prouty drownded
Joe Attien." They will cheerfully admit
ther's death it was made annual and elective.
Joseph Attien won his elections by popular vote
against great opposition, and he carried seven
out of the eight elections held up to the time
of his death. The eighth — by the intervention
of the so-called " Special Law," passed by the
state to reduce the friction between the parties
— was the New Party's first election, none of
Joseph Attien's friends, the Old Party, or Con-
servatives, voting that year.
738
The Death of Thoreau's Guide.
that this is not a man to be spoken of
slightingly, because he is a great water-
man ; but upon this point there is
only one opinion, — that he forced Joe
Attien to run a bad place against his
better judgment, for the mere sake of
showing off. " He pushed himself in."
— " He had n't no business in that boat
at all." — " Prouty drownded Joe Attien,
everybody who was there says so." —
" He had n't no business in that boat,
and did n't belong there anyway, but he
said he was going to run them falls, and
he did run 'em."
It is very hard to tell a true story,
and the more one knows about the facts
the harder it is to make a story of them.
Here was a simple tale of how the inor-
dinate ambition of one man to win a
name for himself brought grief upon
the whole drive. But the next turn of
the kaleidoscope gave a wholly different
combination. For I took what I had
gathered to John Ross himself. " Is this
straight ? " And he said : " No ; you are
all wrong there. Prouty belonged in
that boat; he had been bowman of it
about two days. It was my orders for
them to go down and pick a jam on the
Heater, and they were going. I was
right there and saw the whole of it, and
I never blamed Prouty."
But why then should the men have
blamed him ? No exculpation could be
more complete. There is no appeal from
what John Ross says he ordered and saw
executed. Why do not the men know
this? Instead of telling a simple tale,
are we undertaking to square the mental
circle? For, with nearly two hundred
men close at hand, it seems preposterous
that the facts should not have become
generally known ; it is still more incredi-
ble to suppose that, thinking indepen-
dently, they could all have reached the
same false conclusion ; but that, having
been cross-examined in all sorts of ways
for four -and -thirty years, they should
never have varied from their first error
is inconceivable. Why do the men still
hold Charles Prouty responsible if he was
not to blame ?
From being a study of facts, the story
turns into a question of psychology.
Why is it that when one has been look-
ing at red too long he sees green, and
keeps on seeing green, even when there
is no green there ? — that is the clue.
A man does not get a name like " Ding-
bat " and keep it all his life for nothing.
Therefore, after the men had gazed fix-
edly upon the commanding excellence
of Joseph Attien ; after they had seen
him pass beyond their ken, " all the
trumpets," as it were, " sounding for him
on the other side ; " when they turned
away and looked at the man whom fate
had elected to stand beside him that day,
what would one expect them to see by con-
trast ? Green ! Very green ! And to keep
right on seeing — green ! Having af-
firmed the worth of Joseph Attien and
the warm esteem in which all held him,
it remains to show how, because he was
placed in too sharp a contrast with such
a man, Charles Prouty incurred a blame
which his chief says was none of his.
We come now to the story. Chance
gave to it a fitting frame, — grand scen-
ery, bright sunshine, a date of distinction,
the eye of the Master. You are never
to forget that up on a log-jam, just
below where this happened, stood Him-
self, — John Ross. He ordered the boat
down; he saw it go; he sent another
to the rescue ; he reported this to me ;
it stands authenticated. But what the
men saw and felt, that which is unoffi-
cial, that which represents the current
of the story, and carries us on to the
ending of it, I gathered for myself
among them.
On the drive there is no distinction of
days. Holidays or Sundays, the drivers
know no difference ; one week's end
and the next one's beginning are all the
same to them. The Fourth of July now
is marked for them by no other suitable
The Death of Thoreau's Guide.
739
recognition than extremely early ris-
ing.
But it used not so to be. In the old
days, when it was a point of pride to have
the logs in boom by the last of June,
the men were free to celebrate on the
Fourth. To them the Fourth of July
was the greatest day of all the year.
Like boys just out of school, they were
free from work, free from restraint,
free to make just as much noise as they
pleased ; and, having plenty of money in
their pockets wherewith to purchase all
sorts of a good time, they enjoyed a
glorious liberty. The Fourth was never
a quiet day in Bangorif the drives were
in the boom.
However, the year of our Lord 1870
is distinctly chronicled as one of the
most uneventful ever known, nothing at
all going on but a church levee across the
river in Brewer, so that the police loafed
out the Fourth in weary and unwonted
idleness. The drives were late that year,
so very late that, though the head of
the West Branch drive was some miles
downstream, the rear of it rested on the
Grand Falls of the Indian Purchase.
The hands had been leaving the day be-
fore, so as to get home for the Fourth ;
the water was falling ; the whole drive
was belated and short-handed ; the head
men were worrying ; no one had any time
to remember that it was a legal holiday.
That is, no one remembered it except
the Chronic Shirk. His rights had been
assailed, and, having found a Temporary
Cripple, who could not escape by flight
from his unwelcome company, he in-
sisted on arguing the case, and volleyed
back his opinions of working on a legal
holiday with an explosiveness which re-
minded one of the reports of a bunch of
firecrackers.
It was " Rip — rip — rip — bang !
but he did n't like this workin' on a
Fourth er July ! The Declaration of
Independuns had said — that it was a
man's right — on the Fourth er July —
to git as tight as Lewey's cow — and he
did rip — rip — rip — object — to bein'
defrauded out of his constitoot'nal
rights!"
He was a sun-baked, stubble-faced
fellow, less troubled with clothes than
with the want of patches, but with shirt
and skin about one color where the sun
had toned them to each other around
the more ancient rents ; and he sat in a
niche in the log-jam, expectorating to-
bacco forcibly and to great distances,
and swore voluminously about his ill-
luck in not being somewhere else. Just
then he had nothing to do. He was an
expert at picking out jobs where there
was nothing to do. This time he was
waiting for his mate, who had gone for
an axe, and not a stroke of work had he
done since his mate left him. There it
was, a bright sunny morning about seven
o'clock, a good time to work, and the
logs ricked up like jack-straws on both
sides of the falls, the whole river in
that confusion which the rear has to
clean up and leave tidy ; plenty of work
for this fellow to do with his peavey in
picking off singles and rolling in little
handfuls caught along the edges, and
helping to do his share of the setting to
rights ; but, instead, he sat on a log-jam
in the sun, and spat more vigorously and
swore more violently, as it grew upon
him how ill the world was using him in
making him work on the Fourth of July.
The Cripple, unable to escape, tried to
divert him from his melancholy.
" Well, Tobias Johnson's boat got
down all right," he remarked.
Tobias Johnson and his crew had but
just run the Blue Rock Pitch. It was to
see the boats go down that the Cripple had
crawled out upon the logs. The water
being very bad that morning, what To-
bias Johnson had done was bound to be
a topic of conversation all that hot day
among little groups of men working on
the logs. Even the Shirk ought to have
whirled at such a glittering conversation-
al lure. Instead he sulked.
" I 'd be rip — rip — ripped — if /
740
The Death of Thoreaus Guide.
was seen runnin' these here falls to-day.
It 's a damned shame to have to work on
the Fourth er July anyway. Head men
that knowed beans from bed-bugs would
ha' had the whole jim-bang drive in
long ago ; " — and he exploded a whole
bunch of crackers on the heads of the
offending contractors of the drive.
" Here we be a-swillin' sow-belly an'
Y. E. B's,1 an' down to Bangor, don't I
know jes' 's well as can be, Deacon
Spooner has brought up a thousand
pounds o' salmon to Low's Market, an'
is reportin' all about the sunstroke to
the schoolhouse an' the camp-meetin'
they are gettin' up down to Whisgig on
Shoo-Fly, an' salmon enough for all
hands an' the cook." (Deacon Spoouer
was a sort of summer Santa Glaus, who
purveyed imaginary information and real
Penobscot River salmon. He was held
in high local esteem, but he went out of
print about this time, and the great vol-
ley of oaths which the Shirk shot off at
the merry and inoffensive deacon, though
they may not account for his disappear-
ance, would provide good reason for look-
ing for him among the damned.)
The Cripple tried to get away, but
he was too closely followed. Then, de-
ciding that talking was better than lis-
tening, he took the reins of conversation.
" Bi must have found it awful rough
water," said he ; " don't believe there '11
be not another bo't attempt it to-day
with the water slacking so. Say, did
you hear that yisterday Joe Attien tried
to git Con Murphy to leave Tobias's crew
an' come into his boat ? An' Con said he
liked his own crew, an' did n't want to
change, not even to be in Joe's bo't. I
heerd that he got Ed Conley out of Lewey
Ketchum's bo't now Lewey 's left the
drive. Speaks pretty well for Tobias
though, don't it ? "
The Discontented One turned impar-
tially from Deacon Spooner and damned
Tobias.
1 That is, yellow-eyed beans. Pork and
beans are the river-driver's staple of diet as
"Jim Hill! " said the Cripple, " how
them logs has took to runnin' ! They 're
goin' it high, wide an' lively. That stops
all bo't capers for one while. Any bo't
that had it in mind to rival Bi Johnson
had better think twice about it before they
git out into this mix-up on slack water.
Guess our fun 's up, an' I mought 's well
be crawlin' back to camp."
" Guess I mought 's well stay right
here where I be," said the Shirk ; " John
Ross is up there on that dry jam east
side, an' I 'd jes' 's soon be where I can
keep an eye on him."
The Cripple made a few painful, hob-
bling steps over the logs, and had reached
the crest of the jam, when he turned, with
his hand shading his eyes, and looked
down toward the Blue Rock Pitch, where
a boat was drawn up on the shore, and
the crew stood waiting.
" Say, though," he shouted to the
Shirk, trying to make himself heard
above the water, " looks like they was
talkin' about runnin' after all ! Who is
it ? Make 'em out ? "
The Grumbler put up his head cau-
tiously, to make sure that John Ross was
attending to his own business, before he
ran briskly to the peak of the jam, and
announced that it was that ding-ding-
danged Injun, Joe Attien ; could tell him
by his bigness.
" Hain't he the perfect figure of a man,
though ! " broke in the other in admira-
tion ; " pity his heft keeps him from his
rightful place in the bow." Joe Attien
weighed two hundred and twenty-five,
and, because of his great weight and
strength, always captained his boat from
the stern, although in running quick
water the bow is the place of honor.
The Leisurely One, having made sure
that he was getting the right man, pro-
ceeded to curse Joe Attien and all his
forbears. Then he sat down upon the
logs and resumed his original lamenta-
tion. "Now down Bangor way to-day
well as the lumberman's, and not as much rel-
ished iu midsummer as in the colder season.
The Death of Thoreau's Guide.
741
they 'd be doin' somp'n wuth lookin' at
— Loss races an' bo't races an' " —
" Joe 'd be in the canoe race, sure," in-
terrupted the other.
" Not by a long chalk ! " said the
Grumbler ; " don't you see he 's govern-
or agin ? Don't you rec'lect that last
time, when they made him a ding-danged,
no-good judge, an' him one of the best
paddles in the tribe, a rip — rip — rip —
splitting good man on a paddle, all be-
cause he was a ding-dang-donged gov-
ernor ? "
The other man admitted the cogency
of the argument. " But say," said he,
" that 's the real thing there. Ain't that
Dingbat talkin' up to Joe ? "
They watched the rapid, incisive move-
ments of a slender, agile young fellow,
outlined against Joe's bulk. " Dinged
little weasel," muttered the Grumbler,
identifying him, " so durn spry 't he
don't cast no shadder ! "
Then he relapsed once more into his re-
flective mood. " Now down Bangor way
now, you bet — oh, hoss races an' bo't
races an' canoe races, an' ' Torrent ' and
4 Delooge ' a-squirtin' out in the Square,
an' cirkiss, an' greased pig, an' tub races,
an' velocerpede races — there '11 be
somp'n down there to-day wuth lookin'
at, an' up here nothin' but this dod-
blasted ol' river an' a ding-dang passel
o' logs ! "
" Say," said the other, " I can't quite
make that out yet. I ain't a-catchin' on
to that performance. There 's McCaus-
land, an' Tomer, an' Joe Solomon, an'
Curran, an' Conley, they all belong, —
but where 's Steve Stanislaus ? An' that
little Dingbat, — what 's he doin' with
a paddle there ? "
" Wants Joe to run the falls."
" Well, but he ain't in Joe's bo't ! "
"Course not, little rum scullion ! That's
it ! He 's failed to get his own crew in
most like, an' now he 's stumpin' Joe to
take him along o' his crew. You watch
an' see him do it. He ain't a-goin' to
let Bi Johnson have the name of bein*
the only man that dares to run these falls
to-day, not if he can help it. He '11 shake
the rafters o' heaven, but he '11 show us
that he 's every bit as good a waterman
as Tobias Johnson."
" What makes him light on Joe ? and
where 's Steve ? "
The man did not know as yet that the
day before, when the crews reorganized
at the Lower Lakes, Steve Stanislaus,
who was Joe Attien's friend and cousin
and physical counterpart, had left Joe's
boat. But all sorts of low cunning being
readable to the Shirk, he was not at a
loss for an explanation.
" Well, don't you see, he 's cut Steve
out some ways. Joe handlin' stern, that
gives him a chance to go in the bow, and
that 's right on the way to a bo't of his
own, and what he could n't get with no
other man. He don't ship to be no mid-
shipman in the maulin' they are goin' to
git. He 's figgerin' how to put hisself at
a premum as a crack man."
"Reel Dingbat trick," muttered the
Cripple. " Joe knows that this ain't no
runnin' water to-day ; just wicked to try
to run here the way things is now."
" Don't want to, don't have to," re-
torted the Swearer, for once omitting the
garnish of his speech. And it was more
true than most epigrams. Joe's orders
to go down with a boat did not imply
that he was to run the Blue Rock Pitch
against his judgment. A waterman of
his reputation could dare to be prudent,
and all the spectators thought that he in-
tended to take out above the pitch and
carry by and put in below. Then they
saw him pick up his long paddle.
The Shirk pricked up his ears and be-
gan to be more cheerful. " Looks like
somp'n was goin' to happen now ! " he
chippered. " There they are a-gettin' of
her ready. Now they 're runnin' her
out. There 's Dingbat takin' bow.
Wonder what they are goin' to do with
that spare man ? Which one of them
rip — rip — rippin' galoots do you s'pose
Joe '11 be leavin' behind ? "
742
The Death of Thoreau's Guide.
That seventh man in the boat was what
the men never understood, and it gave
the color to the accusation that Prouty
pushed himself in. Seven men is a
boat's crew when working on logs, but
in running dangerous places they carry
but six, or even four men. It would
seem as if, planning not to run, Joe had
his log-working crew, and then, changing
his mind suddenly, forgot to leave be-
hind the extra man.
" Gosh ! how rough the water is ! "
said the Cripple; "all choked up with
jams both sides, and the logs running to
beat hell. They don't stand one chance,
not in — My soul ! — tbut he 's putting
that spare man in on the lazy seat ! —
Well, what you must do you will do."
It was the inbred fatalism of his class,
which makes them stoical.
Simultaneously the Grumbler fired off
a volley of curses which made the air
smoke. " Rip — rip — rip — bang ! —
bang! If that Go-douged Injun ain't
a-shippin' a Maddywamkeag crew ! "
(In the cant of the river a " Mattawam-
keag crew " means all the men a boat
will hold.)
The Shirk was fully alive now. He
jumped up and took his peavey from the
log beside him. " Guess I '11 be mosey-
in' right along down now," he chirped.
Then he set out running over the logs at
a lively pace, trailing his peavey behind
him. He anticipated seeing something
fully equal to greased pig and velocipede
races.
But there was not much to see that
time. The catastrophe came at once,
before they were fairly started. The
water was very rough that morning, —
on a falling driving-pitch it is always
roughest. There was that crowning cur-
rent, heaped up in the middle, that would
push a boat upon the shore ; there were
the log-jams making the channels nar-
row and crooked ; there were the loose
logs running free, that would elbow and
ram a boat and crowd her off when she
tried to avoid them ; there were the
doubtful, treacherous channels, creatures
of the log-jams along the banks and of
the fickle current, new with every differ-
ing condition, never to be fully memo-
rized ; there were the rocks, not less
cruel because cushioned with great boils
of water ; and there were the boat's own
weight and tremendous momentum. No
thoroughbred waterman will ever under-
take to say how fast a boat can run in a
rapid, for he does not know himself.
He says, " Very fast," and turns the
topic to all-day records.
Still the great sharp-nosed boat had as
little cause to apprehend disaster as any
boat could have had. She bore a picked
crew ; she obeyed Joe Attien ; and she
was a stanch and trusty boat, very wise
about all the ways of water. She knew
all kinds and how to take them. There
were the huge boils, those frightful,
brandy-colored boils, streaked full of
yellow foam-threads spinning from a
hissing centre ; and there were the
slicks, where a great rock betrayed his
lurking-place only by the tail of glassy cur-
rent below, — safe are such places, for the
rock lies above them ; and there were
the ridgy manes of white water-curls,
where the slopes of two great rocks
met and rolled the water backward;
— but she knew how to take them all ;
she was prepared for perils on all sides,
danger unintermittent, whether she took
it slick, or bit into the foam with her
long beak, or caught it raw and crosswise
beneath her flaring gunwales. What
she did not expect was that her peril
would come before she had caught the
set of the current at all ; no one looked
for that, not even the Shirk, who was
running fast so as to be right on hand
when she swamped, and was addressing
to them various select remarks not in-
tended to be heard above the roar of the
water, such as, " Guess you got your bel-
lyful this time, old fellow ; " and, " Go
it, boys, you'll get plumb to hell this
trip," It was nothing to one of his kind
The Death of Thoreau's Guide.
743
that seven men stood in deadly peril, and
the show of the moment he was craftily
neglecting that he might the better wit-
ness the closing spectacle. But he never
dreamed that it would come as it did.
It was a very simple accident ; the
dragon fly, with bulging eyes, rustling in
zigzag flight along the river's brink,
might have reported what he saw as well
as could a man. There was the long,
lean boat, blue without and painted white
within, lying with pointed stern and
longer, tapering snout, steeving sharply,
like a huge fish half out of water ; within
her the line of red-shirted men, their
finny oars fringing her battered sides, the
stripling Prouty high up in the bow, too
eager to snatch the honors of which he
has won so many fairly since ; then the
row of seated men, — ragged red shirts,
sorely weathered ; hard red knuckles,
tense on the oar-butts ; sunburned faces
under torn brims, or hatless ; sun-
scorched eyes, winking through sun-
bleached lashes ; all, Yankee and Irish-
man and Province man, black-eyed In-
dian and blue-eyed Indian, waiting on
big Joe Attien, towering in the stern,
confident that what he did would be
done right. Seven men, and four were
looking backward to the shore, and three
were facing forward toward the water,
four one way and three the other, as if
emblematic of the coming moment when
they should be divided by three and by
four, for life, for death. What they
thought and how they felt, who could
tell now ; but out of all those there the
man's heart which would have been best
worth reading was that spare man's on
the lazy seat, who knew rough water,
and could see ahead, and who had no-
thing at all to do. If he unbuckled his
stout, calked brogans, and slipped them
off his feet, who could say whether it was
done from fear or from foresight ?
Then the poles dip, the long, spruce,
iron-shod poles at bow and stern, the
oars sweep shallow water, and, splash-
ing and gritting gravel as they push off,
the poles dipping one side and the other,
abreast and backward, like the long legs
of an uncertain-minded crane-fly, they
shove her out.
And then was their black fate close
upon them : she did not swing to the
current ; she was too heavy, the crew
were raw to one another and to the boat,
bow and stern did not respond as they
always had done when Steve Stanislaus
and Joe handled boat, as their old crews
still say, " just like one man." Logy and
bewildered, instead of turning promptly
to the current, the old boat let the water
catch her underneath her side. It shot
her straight across the channel, right
among the ugly rocks on the other shore,
close above the Blue Rock Pitch. And
then, before she could be straightened,
the River took her in his giant hands,
and smashed her side against a rock,
smote her down with such a crash that
the men along the banks who saw and
heard it cannot be convinced that she
was not wrecked ; and some who saw her
fill so suddenly still declare that her
whole bottom was torn off as you rip the
peel from a mandarin orange. That is
not true ; she was not much hurt. But
eighteen hundred pounds of boat and
men were hurled upon that sunken rock
with the full force of the River. The
port side buckled fearfully; the ribs
groaned and gave ; the nails screamed
as the sharp rock sheared off their heads,
and a long yellow shaving, ploughed out
of her side, went writhing down the
foaming current. Down to the water's
edge dipped the up-stream gunwale ; in
poured the water in a flood, and before
she settled squarely, the lifted port side
showed that long and ugly scar. What
of the shock that sent the man upon the
lazy seat reeling backward, that tumbled
the men at the oars forward upon their
faces, that wrenched their oars from their
hands and threw the batteau seats from
the cleats, and sent the spare man's driv-
ing shoes adrift among the litter of un-
shipped seats and useless men ? Un-
744
The Death of Thoreau's Guide.
manned, unmanageable, full to the lips
of water, and just on the brink of the
Blue Rock Pitch, what could the old
boat do ? Joe dropped his useless pole
and took his paddle, but she could not
answer to it, and bow-heavy with the
weight of water running forward as she
felt the incline of the fall, her stern reel-
ing high in air, her crew, disarmed and
helpless, crowding on the bowman, she
wallowed down that wicked water among
rocks and logs.
So much is fairly certain, but beyond
this no one seems quite sure ; for I can
find no one who saw it. Tobias John-
son's crew could not, not having eyes in
the backs of their heads, for they had
sprung at once to the rescue in their own
boat. And the Shirk, who would have
been glad to see, was out of the running.
In his haste to be on hand, he had tripped
himself on his peavey, and had been
plunged headforemost into a hole in the
jam, where, kicking and clawing, he
went off like Mother Hoyt's powder-
horn. (Cursing his own awkwardness ?
No, not a bit ! Damning the men who
were struggling in the water, because
they had tripped him up, and had not
given him a fair chance to see them die !)
Nor did John Ross on his log-jam see
it, though he was so near. " I was on
a dry jam right there, but I had kept
Levi Hathorn's boat with me in case any
one should tumble in or anything should
happen, and I sent it down to them, —
and I don't know any more. I saw that
they were going to have a hard time, and
— and I turned and looked the other
way." (Ladies and gentlemen — tender-
hearted ladies, high-minded gentlemen
— pause and consider whether, standing
there, yours would have been the tran-
scendent grace that " turned and looked
the other way " !)
But one thing everybody knows, —
there were men in that boat who could
not swim ; there are such in every boat.
The others leaped and swam ; these clung
to the boat. And Joe Attien stayed
with them, — not clinging as they did,
buried in water, not crouching and ab-
ject, waiting for the death that faced
him, — not a coward, now, never, but
paddle in hand, because the water ran
too deep for pole-hold, standing astride
his sunken boat, a big, calked foot upon
either gunwale, working to the last ounce
that was in him to drive the sunken
wreck and the men clinging to it into
some eddy or cleft of the log-jams before
they were carried down over the Heater
and that thundering fall of the Grand
Pitch. It is the last one sees of Joe At-
tien ; no one has reported anything after
that ; one remembers him always as
standing high in the stern of his boat,
dying with and for his men.
The Humane Society gives no medals
for rescues made along the river; our
men have nothing to show for anything
they have done ; but when all the paeans
of brave deeds are chanted, let some one
remember to sing the praises of Tobias
Johnson's crew. We do not speak of
them, — this is not their day. Enough
that when they saw Joe Attien's boat
swamp they all leaped into their places
and swept out to the rescue. Man after
man they pulled in, heedless of their
own safety. The last one they caught
when they were just on the verge of the
Heater, and then somehow, overloaded
as they were, on the brink of sure death,
they swung in and crept back to the
landing-place.
Ashore they looked over the saved and
called the names of the dead. They had
three. Joe Attien was gone, and Stephen
Tomer, an Indian lad, and Edward Con-
ley of Woodstock, and Dingbat Prouty.
They still hoped for these, — hope dies
hard, and they knew how difficult it is to
drown a man who resolutely prefers to try
his chances of being hanged. So they and
all who had flocked in to them at the fly-
ing rumor of disaster took up pick-poles,
pickaroons, peavies, whatever might be
used to save a living man or to recover
The Death of Thorearfs Guide.
745
the body of a drowned one, and set off
down the drivers' path which skirts the
falls.
There was little hope of finding Joe.
When they saw him go they all under-
stood that, dead or alive, they would find
him with his men. But Dingbat had
been seen swimming strongly. If the
logs had not crushed him, nor the rocks
broken him, he might yet be picked up
in some inshore cove where the eddy
played, clinging to the alders, too for-
done to pull himself out, but still alive.
They searched well and they searched
some time before they found him, — for
I had it from one who was there, — and
when they did discover him, it was the
rescuers who were scant of breath.
" Ga-w-d ! but don't he seem to be
takin' it easy ! " said one.
For a man who had just been through
what he had been through, he certainly
was taking it very easy. He was sitting
on a log out in an eddy, a great hulling-
machine log, peeled by the rocks in rap-
ids, with tatters of bark hanging to its
scarred sides, bitten to the quick by the
ledges, broomed at the ends by being
tumbled over falls. There in the eddy
it was drifting because it was too big to
be dislodged until some driver prodded
it out and over the Grand Pitch. Un-
able to escape, it went sailing round and
round, sometimes butting other logs and
ramming the weaker ones out into the
rapids, sometimes nosing up against the
line of the current, and always drawing
back again into its quiet haven, swimming
slowly, but swinging often, ever a little
beyond the line of the bushes, ever a
little inside the line of the current. The
falls-spume gathered in clots against the
side farthest from the eddy's vortex, and
the torrent, as it rushed past, threw up
wavelets that lapped its flanks. And
there in the warm morning sunshine, wet
as a drowned rat, his hair plastered over
his sharp-cut face, and the wrinkles round
his nose showing more plainly than com-
mon, sat the missing bowman, dripping
from every edge and elbow, but stolidly
sucking his pipe.
" Well, I call that nerve ! " remarked
one of the rescuers, viewing him from be-
hind a screen of bushes. He appreciated
the self-command it took for a man con-
siderably more than half drowned and
entirely soaked to get out his old pipe,
dig her clean, and clamp her under his
spiked shoe to dry while he peeled his
wet tobacco down to the solid heart, got
out his matches from his water-tight vial,
and filled and lit her up. They admired
his young bravado, and waited a moment
watching him, as, theatrically unconscious
of their presence, which he well enough
observed, he drew at his pipe, and swung
with the eddy, his shadow now falling to
the front, now to the rear.
" Ain't he a James Dickey-bird ! "
said another beneath his breath.
Then Dingbat overdid the matter.
" Where 's that damned Injun ? " he
demanded, suddenly acknowledging their
presence.
The ichor of swift resentment coursed
through their veins ; already it was set-
tled in their minds who was responsi-
ble for this disaster. Here he was, safe
enough, having saved himself ; Joe At-
tien was dead trying to save his crew.
As the lightning flash sometimes photo-
graphs indelibly the objects nearest
where it strikes, so on the minds of these
men that unfeeling question branded for-
evermore the pictures that stood for those
two lives, — Dingbat floating at his ease
in the eddy, having looked out for him-
self, Joe Attien drowned and battered
and lost among logs and ledges, willing
to lose himself if he might save his crew.
They have never forgotten, never will
forget, that difference. To this day when
you ask one of them who was there at
the time how Joe Attien died, this con-
trast leaps before him, and he says that
Dingbat Prouty did it.
The rapids give place to river mea-
dows, the meadows grow into salt shore-
746
Butterflies in Poetry.
marshes, the marshes lose themselves at
the verge of ocean, and a mist creeps up
out of the sea. Time levels and softens
all, and draws a veil of haze across to hide
what is unpleasantly harsh. So be it !
Let all that is unworthy, low or mean, be
blotted out, provided that the lights we
steer by, the beacons across the wide waste
waters, be not dimmed ; — leave us, O
Time, the memory of men like this !
I was a tiny child when Joe Attien
died. He had been a familiar friend, and
often, no doubt, he fondled me as he did
his own babies. But I do not remember
him. Instead I recall — not clearly,
though I somehow know that it was they
— the delegation of Indians who came
down to ask my father where they should
go to look for his body. They were tall,
and I looked through their legs as be-
tween tree-trunks, and the shadow of
grief on their dark faces made them like
the heavy tops of the pine trees, trees of
mournfulness and sighing.
" Spos'n Gov'nor could got pole-holt
she could saved 'em."
And, " She could saved it herself, Gov-
'nor, 'cause she strong man and could
swim, but she want to preservation crew."
So my father pondered the problem
and told them where to look for the body.
" A brick would swim in that water, it is
so strong," said he. " The Governor was
a heavy man, but unless he is jammed
under logs or wedged between rocks, he
will be carried right down over Grand
Pitch. As soon as the current slackens
it will drop him, and he will sink in shal-
low water at the inlet to the pond. It is
hot weather now, and, the water being
shoal there, by the time you can get up
river the body will have risen ; you will
find it in the upper end of Shad Pond."
It all came out as he had predicted.
The body of Edward Conley had been
picked up above the falls several days be-
fore, but the two Indians they found to-
gether in Shad Pond on Sunday, the sixth
day. They took both the bodies ashore,
and where they landed they cut a deep
cross into a tree ; and because they could
not treat lightly anything which had be-
longed to so brave a man, Joe Attien's
boots they hung upon a limb of the tree.
There the river-drivers left them till they
wasted away, a strange but sincere me-
morial of a good man.
Fannie Hardy Eckstorm.
PART OF A MAN'S LIFE.
" The uttered part of a man's life, let us always repeat, bears to the unuttered, unconscious
part a small unknown proportion. He himself never knows it, much less do others." — Carlyle's
Essay on Scott.
BUTTERFLIES IN POETRY.
IT was one of the proudest moments
of my college life when I was deputed
by Dr. Harris — the foremost naturalist
then to be found in Harvard University,
if not in the nation — to report upon
the credentials of a foreign prince, and,
if these proved authentic, to introduce
him to academical society. That prince
was and is — for his posterity still re-
mains among us — the most superb
among such potentates who had ever
visited this region ; for he was the Pa-
pilio philenor (now Laertias philenor),
a tropical butterfly then first seen in Cam-
bridge, and the largest ever found so far
North, in America, bringing, moreover,
an unwonted luxuriance in form and col-
or. This butterfly was personally rear
Butterflies in Poetry.
747
by Dr. Harris from a caterpillar found
on a tropical plant at the Cambridge Bo-
tanic Garden ; and its posterity may well
be called " large and magnificent " by
Mr. Samuel H. Scudder, the present suc-
cessor of Dr. Harris as dean of Ameri-
can entomology. It is akin to the great
butterflies of the East Indies or of South
America ; its color is a deep purple, with
glossy tints of green and steel-color, and
large greenish spots passing into straw-
color and orange. Such was the emi-
nent foreigner arriving at Cambridge, in
temporary disguise, in July, 1840, but
destined to be the parent of a race now
permanently acclimated there, and spread
in a similar manner from the Atlantic
to the Pacific. This gorgeous visitant I
had the honor to receive ; and I wrote
thereon a report which may still perhaps
survive among the documents of the Har-
vard Natural History Society.
In looking through an outdoor note-
book of twenty years later I find that I
was at that period reintroduced to my
early prince.
« July 3 [1861]. — The eternal youth-
fulness of Nature answers to my own
feeling of youth and preserves it. As I
turn from these men and women around
me, whom I watch gradually submerged
under the tide of gray hairs — it seems
a bliss I have never earned, to find bird,
insect and flower renewing itself each
year in fresh eternal beauty, the same
as in my earliest childhood. The little
red butterflies have not changed a streak
of black on their busy wings, nor the
azure dragonflies lost or gained a shade
of color, since we Cambridge children
caught them in our childish hands. Yes-
terday by a lonely oak grove there flut-
tered out a great purple butterfly, almost
fresh from the chrysalis, and alighted
just before me, waving its lustrous wings.
It was the beautiful Papilio philenor,
which Dr. Harris showed us in college,
as having just been found, an entire nov-
elty, in the Botanic Garden. I had not
seen it for twenty years, and here it was,
the same brilliant tropical creature, pro-
pagated through a series of unwatched
generations, perhaps unnoticed till it
reached this lonely grove. With a col-
lector's instinct I put my hat over it, but
it got away and I was hardly sorry. It
had come to link me with those vanished
years."
Looking back on those early days, it
would seem that the butterfly world might
have drawn from my banished prince
something of its peculiar charm. Cer-
tainly this winged race has long been
familiar with royal family titles ; at least,
ever since Linnaeus drew its scientific
names from the Greek mythology, and
later European entomologists from the
Scandinavian, and our own native natu-
ralists from the American Indian. Even
these names are constantly changing,
with new subdivisions and shifting con-
nections ; while the simpler English word,
drawn obviously, like " butterfly," from
the yellow colors predominating in the
meadows at midsummer, has yet been
brought under a new interpretation, since
a poet's daughter, Sarah Coleridge,
stoutly maintains that the word simply
originated in the phrase " better fly."
After all, the chief charm of this race
of winged flowers does not lie in their
varied and brilliant beauty, nor yet in
their wonderful series of transformations,
— their long and sordid caterpillar life,
their long slumber in the chrysalis, or the
very brief period which comprises their
beauty, their love-making, their paren-
tage, and their death. Nor does it lie in
the fact that we do not yet certainly
know whether they have in the caterpil-
lar shape the faculty of sight, or not, and
do not even know the precise use of their
most conspicuous organ in maturity, the
antennae. Nor does it consist in this, that
they of all created things have furnished
man with the symbol of his own immor-
tality. It rather lies in the fact that, with
all their varied life and activity, they
represent an absolutely silent existence.
748
Butterflies in Poetry.
Victor Hugo has indeed somewhere
pronounced the whole insect world to be,
with hardly an exception, a world of si-
lence. We feel, he says, as if life in-
volved noise, but the most multitudinous
portion of the race of living things —
fishes and insects — is almost absolutely
still. The few that buzz or murmur are
as nothing compared to the vast majority
which are born and die soundless. If
this is true of insects as a whole, it is of
butterflies that it is eminently truest. All
the vast array of modern knowledge has
found no butterfly which murmurs with
an audible voice, and only a very few
species which can even audibly click or
rustle with their wings ; Darwin first
observing these in South America, and
others recording them at long intervals
of years in Europe, and, finally, in the
United States. Mr. Scudder has not only
detected a soft sound in one or two cases,
proceeding from the wings, and sounding
like the faint rustling of sandpaper, but
he hazards the opinion that many of the
quivering or waving motions of the wings
of these bright creatures, although in-
audible to us, may be accompanied by
sounds which the butterflies themselves
or their kindred might hear.
If they can be thus heard without
sound, why do we not at least hear more
of them by fame in literature? They
contribute much of the summer grace of
the universe : they are of all beings the
most picturesque in their lives, having
three different phases of existence, each
peculiar, and all frequently gorgeous,
— the caterpillar, the chrysalis, and the
imago, or fully developed creature. They
are incomparably more numerous and
more varied than birds, — the number of
species far larger, and the swarms incom-
parably greater, where swarming is their
practice ; when they enter poetry they
do it with yet more grace ; but fewer au-
thors describe them, and those few more
charily. Thoreau, for instance, rarely
mentions them, and in some ways seems
singularly ignorant of them. Thus in
his MS. diary (1853-54, page 395) he de-
scribes himself as bringing home from
the marshy meadows the great paper co-
coon of the gray sphinx moth (Attacus
cecropia) , and as carrying it unrecog-
nized to Dr. Harris, to learn about it, —
an object which every schoolboy knows,
one would suppose, and which is at least
of kindred to the butterflies.
The butterflies being thus silent, it is
not, perhaps, strange that we do not inter-
pret them better, but that each observer
finds his own interpretation, or his own
sympathetic response, varying, it may
be, from any other. Thus Austin Dob-
son, writing poetry on a fan that had be-
longed to the Marquise de Pompadour,
finds delineated upon it, "Courtiers as
butterflies bright ; " while Bryant in his
June finds the creatures quite too indo-
lent to be approved as courtiers : —
The idle butterfly
Should rest him there.
Edmund Gosse, meanwhile, finds in their
mien, as he views them while lying in
the grass, no trace of idleness, but rather
the fatigue due to arduous labor : —
The weary butterflies that droop their wings.
Percy Mackaye in his blithe book, The
Canterbury Pilgrims, complicates the
matter by obliging the butterfly to keep
off the attentions of the moth-miller : —
Mealy miller, moth-miller,
Fly away !
If Dame Butterfly doth say thee nay,
Go and court a caterpillar !
And Keats, always the closest of ob-
servers, acquits his winged creatures of
all care when he says of Endymion,
His eyelids
Widened a little, as when Zephyr bids
A little breeze to creep between the fans
Of careless butterflies.
But when we turn to that marvelous-
ly gifted family into which so much of
the descriptive power of Keats has passed,
we find Charles Tennyson weaving the
butterfly's wing and the human heart's
love into a cadence so exquisitely deli-
Butterflies in Poetry.
749
cate that his laureate brother never sur-
it: —
SONNET
To On Accidentally Rubbing the Dust from
a Butterfly's Wing.
The light-set lustre of this insect's mail
Hath bloom 'd my gentlest touch — This first of
May
Has seen me sweep the shallow tints away
From half his pinion, drooping now and pale !
Look hither, coy and timid Isabel !
Fair Lady, look into my eyes, and say,
Why thou dost aye refuse thy heart to stay
On mine, that is so fond and loves so well ?
Is beauty trusted to the morning dews,
And to the butterfly's mischanceful wing,
To the dissolving cloud in rainbow hues,
To the frail tenure of an early spring,
In blossoms, and in dyes ? and must I lose
Claim to such trust, all Nature's underling ?
Mrs. Piatt, our American poet, reached
a prof ounder, if less exquisite, touch when
she thus reproved her adventurous boy
for reversing the usual insect develop-
ment by removing the wings of a butter-
%:-
AFTER WINGS.
This was your butterfly, you see, —
His fine wings made him vain :
The caterpillars crawl, but he
Passed them in rich disdain. —
My pretty boy says, " Let him be
Only a worm again ! "
0 child, when things have learned to wear
Wings once, they must be fain
To keep them always high and fair :
Think of the creeping pain
Which even a butterfly must bear
To be a worm again !
And elsewhere she moralizes, as is her
wont : —
Between the falling leaf and rose-bud's breath ;
The bird's forsaken nest and her new song
(And this is all the time there is for Death) ;
The worm and butterfly — it is not long !
More thoughtful still, and in the end
more uplifted, is this fine poem by Mary
Emily Bradley, a poet from farther
West : —
A CHRYSALIS.
My little Madchen found one day
A curious something in her play,
That was not fruit, nor flower, nor seed ;
It was not anything that grew,
Or crept, or climbed, or swam, or flew ;
Had neither legs nor wings, indeed ;
And yet she was not sure, she said,
Whether it was alive or dead.
She brought it in her tiny hand
To see if I would understand,
And wondered when I made reply,
" You 've found a baby butterfly."
" A butterfly is not like this,"
With doubtful look she answered me.
So then I told her what would be
Some day within the chrysalis ;
How, slowly, in the dull brown thing
Now still as death, a spotted wing,
And then another, would unfold,
Till from the empty shell would fly
A pretty creature, by and by,
All radiant in blue and gold.
" And will it, truly ? " questioned she —
Her laughing lips and eager eyes
All in a sparkle of surprise —
" And shall your little Madchen see ? "
" She shall ! " I said. How could I tell
That ere the worm within its shell
Its gauzy, splendid wings had spread,
My little Madchen would be dead ?
To-day the butterfly has flown, —
She was not here to see it fly, —
And sorrowing I wonder why
The empty shell is mine alone.
Perhaps the secret lies in this :
I too had found a chrysalis,
And Death that robbed me of delight
Was but the radiant creature's flight !
The extraordinary gifts of the butter-
fly race have always excited the wonder
not only of naturalists, but of the most
ignorant observers. Note their silent and
unseen changes ; the instinct by which
they distinguish their favorite plant-food,
as, for instance, among the scarcely dif-
fering species of the complex race of
asters, where they show themselves, as
Professor Asa Gray said, " better bot-
anists than many of us ; " their skill in de-
positing their eggs unerringly on or near
the precise plant on which the f orthcom-
ingcaterpillars are fitted to feed, although
they as butterflies have never tasted it.
To these should be added their luxurious
spread of wings, giving opportunities for
those curious resemblances of color which
protect them during the few days of their
750
Butterflies in Poetry.
winged state ; and, finally, the brief time
when, if ever, their eggs must be laid
and the continuance of the race made
sure. The whole realm of animal " mim-
icry," as it is now termed, reaches its
highest point in them, and leads to some
extreme cases ; as in the fact that, while
butterflies are ordinarily monogamous,
there is yet one species in Africa which
has departed so widely from this rule
that the male has not one mate only, but
actually three different wives, each so
utterly unlike him in appearance as to
have long been taken for wholly differ-
ent species.
Even in winter, Agassiz tells us, the
changes in the eggs of insects go on
through the season, protected by the
shell, and this is still more true of the
chrysalis. Living butterflies prepare
for spring freedom by nestling away in
great numbers during the previous au-
tumn. This is especially true of the early
" Mourning Cloak " (Euvanessa antir
opa), called in England the " Camber-
well Beauty," which has been recorded
in every month of the year in our North-
ern states. No one really knows where
these butterflies may go, but they may
be seen by scores around favorite win-
dows, following their instinct of retreat.
One of them lived all winter in the cel-
lar of a house near mine in Cambridge,
Massachusetts, changing its position half-
a-dozen times during that period. Yet
butterflies of the same or kindred species
have been known to spend all of two win-
ters in the chrysalis, leaving the inter-
mediate summer also a blank. This is
one of the few butterflies which lay their
eggs in extremely methodical clusters,
usually on the under side of a leaf ; and
sometimes a hundred may thus be hatched
side by side, bending down the branches.
Let me turn again to my early outdoor
journal (1861) for this brief meditation
on a box containing chrysalids. " There
is something infinitely touching in the
thought that these creatures which have
been leading a life so free, even if low
and sordid, have now utterly suspended
all the ceaseless action and gone to sleep
in this little box of mine, each inclosed
in a yet smaller self-made tomb, pa-
tiently awaiting resurrection to an utterly
new life. When I think of the complete
suspension of their active existence dur-
ing this dark time, and of the quiet in-
variable way in which all the generations
of insect life have gone through the same
slumber and transfiguration ever since
the universe began, it makes our human
birth and death seem greater mysteries
than ever."
Reverting again to my old notebook,
I read this confession which I still can-
not retract : " I find that to me works
of art do not last like those of nature.
I grow tired of pictures — never of a
butterfly." There is doubtless among
these airy creatures something akin to
the mind's visions, else why in various na-
tions and under varying religions should
the same insect have represented immor-
tality ; or why, when the most gifted of
recent French writers of fiction lost con-
trol of his mind and said perpetually,
" Oil sont mes idees ? " should he have
fancied that he found them in butterflies ?
Or how else can we explain so fine a
strain of profound thought as in this son-
net by an else unknown English poet,
Thomas Wade, writing in 1839 : —
THE BURIED BUTTERFLY.
What lovely things are dead within the sky,
By our corporeal vision undiscern'd —
Extinguished suns, that once in glory burn'd ;
And blighted planets mouldering gloomily
Beyond the girdle of the galaxy ;
And faded essences, in light inurn'd,
Of creatures spiritual, to that Deep return'd
From whence they sprang, in far Eternity —
This e'er to know is unto us forbidden ;
But much thereto concerning may we deem,
By inference from fact familiar :
Beneath those radiant flowers and bright grass
hidden
Withers a thing once golden as a star
And seeming unsubstantial as a dream.
In passing from the transformations
of the butterfly to its higher affinities and
Butterflies in Poetry.
751
analogies, we find them suggested well
in this finely touched poem by Miss Ina
Coolbrith of California : —
THE MARIPOSA LILY.
Insect or blossom ? Fragile, fairy thing,
Poised upon slender tip, and quivering
To flight ! a flower of the fields of air ;
A jewelled moth ; a butterfly, with rare
And tender tints upon his downy wing,
A moment resting in our happy sight ;
A flower held captive by a thread so slight
Its petal-wings of broidered gossamer
Are, light as the wind, with every wind astir, —
Wafting sweet odor, faint and exquisite.
O dainty nursling of the field and sky,
What fairer thing looks up to heaven's blue
And drinks the noontide sun, the dawning's
dew?
Thou winged bloom ! thou blossom-butterfly !
A similar range of affinities is touched
less profoundly, yet -with finished grace,
by Mrs. Louise Chandler Moulton : —
A PAINTED FAN.
Roses and butterflies snared on a fan,
All that is left of a summer gone by ;
Of swift, bright wings that flashed in the sun,
And loveliest blossoms that bloomed to die !
By what subtle spell did you lure them here,
Fixing a beauty that will not change, —
Roses whose petals never will fall,
Bright, swift wings that never will range ?
Had you owned but the skill to snare as well
The swift-winged hours that came and went,
To prison the words that in music died,
And fix with a spell the heart's content,
Then had you been of magicians the chief;
And loved and lovers should bless your art,
If you could but have painted the soul of the
thing, —
Not the rose alone, but the rose's heart !
Flown are those days with their winged de-
lights,
As the odor is gone from the summer rose ;
Yet still, whenever I wave my fan,
The soft, south wind of memory blows.
We should not overlook, moreover, the
fact that our most wayward American
poet, reverting for once unequivocally to
the prose form, has given the best and
the most graphic butterfly-picture easily
to be found in that shape. The many
critics of Whitman, who have expressed
the opinion that he marred and perhaps
shortened his fame by choosing an ha-
bitual measure neither prose nor verse —
as did the once admired author of Pro-
verbial Philosophy before him — may
find their conviction strengthened, per-
haps, by the peculiar attractiveness of
this outdoor reverie in prose.
"Aug. 4 [1880]. — A pretty sight!
Where I sit in the shade — a warm day,
the sun shining from cloudless skies, the
forenoon well advanc'd — I look over a
ten-acre field of luxuriant clover-hay,
(the second crop) — the livid ripe red
blossoms and dabs of August brown
thickly spotting the prevailing dark-
green. Over all flutter myriads of light-
yellow butterflies, mostly skimming along
the surface, dipping and oscillating, giv-
ing a curious animation to the scene.
The beautiful spiritual insects ! straw-
color'd Psyches ! Occasionally one of
them leaves his mates, and mounts, per-
haps spirally, perhaps in a straight line
in the air, fluttering up, up, till literally
out of sight. In the lane as I came
along just now I noticed one spot, ten
feet square or so, where more than a
hundred had collected, holding a revel,
a gyration-dance, or butterfly good-time,
winding and circling, down and across,
but always keeping within the limits.
The little creatures have come out all of
a sudden the last few days, and are now
very plentiful. As I sit outdoors, or
walk, I hardly look around without some-
where seeing two (always two) fluttering
through the air in amorous dalliance.
Then their inimitable color, their fragili-
ty, peculiar motion — and that strange,
frequent way of one leaving the crowd
and mounting up, up in the free ether,
and apparently never returning. As I
look over the field, these yellow-wings
everywhere mildly sparkling, many
snowy blossoms of the wild carrot grace-
fully bending on their tall and taper stems
— while for sounds, the distant guttural
752
Butterflies in Poetry.
screech of a flock of guinea-hens comes
shrilly yet somehow musically to my ears.
And now a faint growl of heat-thunder
in the north — and ever the low rising
and falling wind-purr from the tops of
the maples and willows.
" Aug. 20. — Butterflies and butter-
flies (taking the place of the bumble-
bees of three months since, who have
quite disappeared) continue to flit to and
fro, all sorts, white, yellow, brown, pur-
ple— now and then some gorgeous yel-
low flashing lazily by on wings like
artists' palettes dabb'd with every color.
Over the breast of the pond I notice
many white ones, crossing, pursuing their
idle capricious flight. Near where I sit
grows a tall-stemm'd weed topt with a
profusion of rich scarlet blossoms, on
which the snowy insects alight and dally,
sometimes four or five of them at a time.
By-and-by a humming - bird visits the
same, and I watch him coming and go-
ing, daintily balancing and shimmering
about. These white butterflies give new
beautiful contrasts to the pure greens of
the August foliage (we have had some
copious rains lately), and over the glis-
tening bronze of the pond-surface. You
can tame even such insects ; I have one
big and handsome moth down here, knows
and comes to me, likes me to hold him
upon my extended hand.
" Another Day, later. — A grand
twelve-acre field of ripe cabbages with
their prevailing hue of malachite green,
and floating-flying over and among them
in all directions myriads of these same
white butterflies. As I came up the lane
to-day I saw a living globe of the same,
two or three feet in diameter, many scores
cluster'd together and rolling along in the
air, adhering to their ball-shape, six or
eight feet above the ground."
This white butterfly described is
doubtless the cabbage butterfly (Pieris
rapce) already mentioned. It was too
early in the season for its full practice of
that swarming propensity in which it sur-
passes all others, and which a poet thus
puts on record ; but Mr. Scudder tells us
of an occasion when Dr. Schultze found
himself in a dead calm in the Baltic Sea,
and " steamed for three hours and a dis-
tance of thirty miles through a continuous
flock of the Cabbage butterfly, from ten
to thirty miles from the main land, and
only five miles less than that from the
nearest island ; afterward the shore was
found strewn with their dead bodies."
If only to show that others, twenty
years before Whitman, had written for
their own pleasure some outdoor records
of butterflies, I will venture to print
from my old notebook the memoranda
of a walk in Princeton, Massachusetts, a
mountain village which I have never seen
surpassed as a nursery of butterflies and
birds.
" July 16 [1862]. — In the morning
went to visit Miss 's school. Often
as I have dreamed of a more abundant
world of insects than any ever seen, I
never enjoyed it more vividly than in
walking along the breezy upland road,
lined with a continuous row of milkweed
blossoms and white flowering alder, all
ablaze with butterflies. I might have
picked off hundreds of Aphrodites by
hand, so absorbed were they in their pret-
ty pursuit ; and all the interspaces be-
tween their broader wings seemed filled
with little skipper butterflies, and pretty
painted-ladies (Pharos) and an occasion-
al Comma. The rarer Idalia and Hun-
tera sometimes visit them also and a host
of dipterous, hymenopterous and hemip-
terous things. The beautiful mountain
breeze played forever over them and it
seemed a busy and a blissful world."
These names have all doubtless suf-
fered what may be called a land-change,
in the more than half century since their
bestowal, — so constant are the shiftings
of insect family names in the hands of
the scientists, — but they bring back, to
one person at least, very pleasant memo-
ries of summer friends.
It is a curious fact, yet perhaps not
wholly inappropriate to our broad and
Butterflies in Poetry.
753
sunny American continent, that while
England far exceeds us in the thorough
and patient study of the habits of the
insect world, yet butterflies figure less,
on the whole, in English poetry than in
American. Looking somewhat carefully,
for instance, through the nearly six hun-
dred pages of Sir M. E. Grant-Duff's
recent Anthology of Victorian Poetry
I find but one allusion of this kind,
namely, in Mrs. Norton's couplet, taken
from The Lady of La Garaye : —
The butterfly its tiny mate pursues
With rapid fluttering of its painted hues.
Yet Mr. Stedman in his volume of
American poetry — a book of about the
same size — has a number of poems on
this precise subject, several of which have
here been quoted ; while other fine pas-
sages he omits, as that in which Alfred
Street speaks of
the last butterfly,
Like a wing'd violet, floating in the meek,
Pink-color'd sunshine, sinks his velvet feet
Within the pillar'd mullein's delicate down,
And shuts and opens his unruffled fans.
Does this difference come from our more
varied landscape, or from our brighter
sunshine, lending a more brilliant tint to
the waving wings ? Of course this com-
parison may be regarded as accidental,
since no butterfly allusion is more famil-
iar than that of Wordsworth, —
My sister Emmeline and I
Together chased the butterfly ;
although in this, undoubtedly, the human
interest is predominant, and the insect
furnishes only an excuse for it. Bayly's
" I 'd be a butterfly " is hardly worth
mentioning, or Rogers's too didactic
" Child of the sun ! " but no four lines
present this winged world with more
solemn impressiveness than where Lord
de Tabley in his Circe writes, —
And the great goblin moth, who bears
Between his wings the ruin'd eyes of death ;
And the enamell'd sails
Of butterflies, who watch the morning's breath.
Yet this is only a single stanza, and I
know of no sustained poem on the butter-
VOL. xcin. — NO. 560. 48
fly so full of deep thought and imagina-
tion — despite some technical defects —
as this, by an author less known than she
should be, Mrs. Alice Archer James, of
Urbana, Ohio. With it this series of
quotations and reminiscences may well
enough end, the writer fearing lest he
may, after all, have only called down
upon himself the reproach of Chaucer, —
Swiche talkying is nat worth a boterflie.
THE BUTTERFLY.
I am not what I was yesterday,
God knows my name.
I am made in a smooth and beautiful way,
And full of flame.
The color of corn are my pretty wings,
My flower is blue.
I kiss its topmost pearl, it swings
And I swing too.
I dance above the tawny grass
In the sunny air,
So tantalized to have to pass
Love everywhere.
0 Earth, O Sky, you are mine to roam
In liberty.
1 am the soul and I have no home, —
Take care of me.
For double I drift through a double world
Of spirit and sense ;
I and my symbol together whirled
From who knows whence ?
There 's a tiny weed, God knows what good, —
It sits in the moss.
Its wings are heavy and spotted with blood
Across and across.
I sometimes settle a moment there,
And I am so sweet,
That what it lacks of the glad and fair
I fill complete.
The little white moon was once like me ;
But her wings are one.
Or perhaps they closed together be
As she swings in the sun.
When the clovers close their three green wings
Just as I do,
I creep to the primrose heart of things,
And close mine, too.
754
The Common Lot.
And then wide opens the candid night,
Serene and intense ;
For she has, instead of love and light,
God's confidence.
And I watch that other butterfly,
The one-winged moon,
Till, drunk with sweets in which I lie,
I dream and swoon.
And then when I to three days grow,
I find out pain.
For swift there comes an ache, — I know
That I am twain.
And nevermore can I be one
In liberty.
O Earth, 0 Sky, your use is done,
Take care of me.
Thomas Wentworth Higginson.
THE COMMON LOT.1
XXI.
HUSBAND and wife did not speak while
they were being driven across the city to
their home. That which lay between
them was too heavy to be touched upon
at once in words. Several times the
architect glanced fearfully at his wife.
She rested limply on the carriage cush-
ion, with closed eyes, and occasionally
a convulsive tremor twitched her body.
The summer heat, which had raged un-
tempered for weeks, had already sapped
her usual strength, and now her face had
a bloodless pallor that made the man
wince miserably. When their cab stopped
at the North Side Bridge, a burly ves-
sel was being pulled through the draw.
Helen opened her eyes languidly ; once
or twice she sought her husband's face,
which was turned blankly toward the
crowded street. Her lips moved, and
then she closed her eyes again. As they
got out of the cab, a neighbor who was
passing spoke to them and made a little
joke, to which Hart replied pleasantly,
with perfect self-control. The woman
leaning on his arm shivered, as if a fresh
chill had seized her.
The children were spending a month
in Wisconsin with Jackson's mother,
and so the two sat down to a silent din-
ner. When the maid had come and gone
for the last time, Hart looked furtively
across the table to his wife, and said
gently, —
" Won't you go upstairs, Nell ? You
don't look able to sit up."
She shook her head and tried to speak,
but her voice was gone. Finally she
whispered, —
" Francis, you must tell me all about
it, — everything ! "
He frowned and said nothing, until
she repeated, " Everything, you must
tell me ! " and then he said, —
" See here, Nell, we 'd better drop
this thing and not think of it again.
That man Pemberton, who has pestered
the life out of me all along, has made a
row. That 's all ! And he '11 repent it,
too ! He can't do anything to me. It 's
a business quarrel, and I don't want you
to worry over it."
He was cool and assured, and spoke
with the kindly authority of a husband.
" No, Francis ! " She shook her head
wearily. " That can't be. I must know,
— I must help you ! "
" You can't help me," he replied
calmly. " I have told you enough. They
can't do anything. I don't want to go
any further into that business."
" I must know ! " she cried.
He was startled at the new force
her voice, the sign of a will erecting
self with its own authority against '.
" Know what ? What that fool Per
Copyright, 1903, by ROBERT HKHRICK.
The Common Lot.
755
berton thinks of me ? You heard enough
of that, I guess ! "
" Don't put me off ! Don't put me
away from you, Francis ! If we are to
love each other, if we are to live to-
gether, I must know you, all of you. I
am in a fog. There is something wrong
all about me, and it gets between us and
kills our love. I cannot — bear — it ! "
Her voice broke into pleading, and
ended in a sob. But controlling herself
quickly, she added, —
"Mr. Pemberton is a fair man, a just
man. But if he 's wrong, I want to
know that, too. I want to hate him for
what he said to you."
"You would like to judge me, to
judge your husband ! " he retorted coldly.
" That is not the way to love. I thought
you would believe in me, all through to
the end."
" So I shall — if you will tell me all
the truth ! I would go with you any-
where, to prison if need be, if you would
be open with me ! "
" We need n't talk of going to prison
yet ! " he exclaimed in exasperation.
He went to the sideboard, and pour-
ing himself a glass of whiskey, set the
decanter on the table.
" They can't do anything but talk ! "
he repeated. Then, warmed by the liquor,
he began to be more insolent, to speak de-
fiantly.
" Pemberton 's been after me from the
start. He wanted Wright to get the work,
and he 's tried to put every obstacle he
could in my way. It was first one thing
and then another. He has made life un-
endurable with his prying and his suspi-
cions. But I won't stand it another day.
I 'm going to Everett to-morrow and tell
him that I shall get out if Pemberton is
to interfere with my orders. And they
can't lay a finger on me, I tell you. Pem-
berton can just talk ! "
Helen had put her head between her
hands, and she was sobbing. Every hot
word that he spoke drove conviction
against him into her heart. At last she
raised her tear-stained face and cried out
with a new access of power, —
"Stop! Stop!"
Then she rose, took the decanter of
whiskey, replaced it on the sideboard,
and seated herself by his side, putting her
hand on his arm.
" Francis, if you care for me, if you
want us ever to love each other again,
answer me honestly ! Have you and
that contractor done anything wrong
about the school ? "
" You can't understand ! " he replied
roughly, drawing his arm from her touch.
" You are making a great deal out of
your own imagination."
" Answer me ! " she said, in the same
tense tone of pure will. " Have you let
that man Graves cheat, — do anything
dishonest, — and shut your eyes to it ? "
" Pemberton claims he has n't lived up
to the specifications," the architect ad-
mitted sullenly.
" And you knew it ? "
"So he says."
There was a moment's silence between
them, while the vision of this fraud filled
their minds. She seemed to hesitate be-
fore the evil thing which she had raised,
and then she asked again, —
" Have you — did you make any
money from it ? "
He did not reply.
" Tell me, Francis ! " she persisted.
" Did this man give you anything for
letting him — cheat the trustees ? Tell
me!"
He was cold and careless now. This
new will in his wife, unexpected, unlike
her gentle, yielding nature, compelled
him to reveal some part of the truth. In
this last resort her will was the stronger.
He said slowly : —
" If he made a good sum from the
school contract, there was an understand-
ing that he was to give me some stock.
It was involved with other business."
" He was to give you stock ? "
" Yes ; stock in a hotel that he 's been
building, — another piece of work."
756
The Common Lot.
" And he has given you this stock ? "
" Some of it."
" What have you done with it ? "
« Sold it."
" You have sold it ? "
" Yes ! It was a kind of bonus he gave
me for getting him the contract and for
doing the hotel, too."
Further than that he would not go.
They left the subject late at night. He
was sullen and hard, and resented her
new tone of authority to him ; for he had
always counted on her acquiescence and
tenderness as his immutable rights.
In the morning this feeling of resent-
ment was more firmly fixed. He re-
gretted that in a moment of weakness
be had told her what he had the night
before. When she came to him as he
was preparing to leave the house, and,
putting her hands on his arms, begged
him to talk with her again before going,
he listened moodily and said that he was
pressed for time.
" Won't you go to them, to the trus-
tees, to Everett anyway, and tell them
everything you know ? And give them
that money, the money you got from the
stock ! "
" That 's a woman's plan ! That would
make a nice mess, would n't it ? I told
you I got that as a bonus. It 's often
done, something like that. You 'd like
to see me get into trouble, — be disgraced
for good and all ? "
" That cannot be helped now," she
answered quietly. " The disgrace can-
not be helped ! "
" What rot ! " he sneered. " You make
me out a thief at once. Suppose you
look at what some of your acquaintances
do, — the good, rich people in this town,
— and see how they make their money !
Ask people how Silas Stewart gets his
rebates from the railroads. Ask any
one about the way Strauss grades his
wheat." . . .
" I don't want to know. That has no-
thing to do with this matter."
He left her impatiently. They did
not reopen the matter that evening, nor
the next day. Her face was set and
stern, with a kind of dreary purpose in
it, which made him unhappy. He went
out of the city on business, and did not
return for several days. When he came
home no mention was made of his ab-
sence, and for another week they lived
silently. The night before the children
were to return from their vacation with
their grandmother, while husband and
wife lay awake, each troubled by the com-
mon thought, she spoke again.
" Francis," she said firmly, " we can't
go on like this. The boys are coming
to-morrow. They must n't see us living
this way. And it 's bad for you, Fran-
cis, and I can't stand it ! I have been
thinking it over. I must go away with
the boys. I shall go to uncle Powers's
house in Vernon Falls."
" You are going to leave me, and take
the children with you, because you think
I am in trouble," he said accusingly.
" You know that is n't true ! If you
will only meet it honorably, like the man
I loved and married, I will stay, and be
with you always, no matter what comes.
Will you ? "
" So you want to make conditions ! "
" Just one ! "
" You had better go, then."
The next day she telephoned her mo-
ther to come to her, and when Mrs.
Spellman arrived she said quietly, —
" Mother, I am going to Vermont, to
the farm. It may be for a long time.
Will you come with me ? "
Mrs. Spellman, who was a wise wo-
man, took her daughter's face between
her hands and kissed her
" Of course ! " she answered simply.
That day they made the necessary pre-
parations for themselves and the chil-
dren. When the architect returned from
his office and saw what was going for-
ward, he said to his wife, —
"So you are determined to leave
me? "
The Common Lot.
757
" Yes, I must go."
" I have seen Everett. They are n't
going to do anything. I told you it was
all bluff on Pemberton's part."
She hesitated, uncertain what to think,
and then she asked searchingly, —
" Why are n't they going to do any-
thing ? What does it mean ? "
" Oh, I guess the others have brought
Pemberton to his senses," he replied
evasively.
" No, Francis ! It is n't made right
yet. You would be different if it were.
Somehow, from the beginning, when there
first was talk of this school, it has been
wrong. I hate it ! I hate it ! And it
goes back of that, too. It starts from the
very beginning, when we were married,
and began to live together. We have
always done as the others do all around
us, and it is all wrong. I see it now ! We
can never go on the same way " —
" What way ? I don't understand
you," he interrupted.
" Why, earning and spending money,
trying to get more and more, trying to
get things. It 's spoiled your work ; it 'a
spoiled you ; and I have been blind and
weak, to let us drift on like the others,
getting and spending, struggling to get
ahead, until it has come to this, to this, —
something dreadful that you will not tell
me. Something you have done to make
money. Oh, how low and mean it is !
How mean it makes men and women ! "
" That 's life ! " he retorted neatly.
" No, no, never ! That was n't what
you and I thought on the steamer when
we were coming home from Europe. I
wish you were a clerk, a laborer, a farm-
hand, — anything, so that we could be
honest, and think of something besides
ambition. Let us begin again, from the
very beginning, and live like the common
people, and live for your work, for the
thing you do ! Then we should be happy.
Never this way, not if you make millions,
millions ! "
"Well, I can't see why you are leav-
ing," the architect answered, content to
see her mind turn from the practical
question.
" Tell me ! " she exclaimed passion-
ately. " Tell me ! Are you honest ?
Are you an honest man ? Is it all right
with that building ? With that contrac-
tor ? Tell me, and I will believe you."
" I have said all that I am going to say
about that," he answered.
" Then, Francis, I go ! "
The next afternoon the architect met
them at the train and saw them start,
punctiliously doing all the little things
that might make their journey pleasant.
He referred to their going as a short va-
cation trip, and joked with the boys. Just
before the train started, while Mrs. Spell-
man settled the children in their section,
Helen walked up and down the platform
with him. As the signal for starting was
given, she raised her veil, revealing the
tears in her eyes, and leaning toward
him, kissed him. She put into his hands
a little card, which she had been holding
clasped in her palm. He raised his hat
and stood on the platform until the long
train had pulled out of the shed. Then
he glanced at the card in his hand and
read : —
" You know that I shall come to you
when you really want me. H."
He crushed the card in his fist and
threw it into the roadbed.
xxn.
As the architect had said to his wife, the
trustees did nothing. In the end Everett
Wheeler settled the matter. After the
first gust of passion it was clear enough
that the trustees could not have a scandal
about the building. If the contractor
were prosecuted, the architect, the do-
nor's nephew, would be involved ; and,
besides, it was plain that Wheeler could
not continue as trustee and assist in ruin-
ing his cousin. When it came to this
point, Pemberton, not wishing to embar-
rass his associates, resigned.
758
The Common Lot.
Hart was to continue nominally as
the architect, but Trimble was to have
charge of the building henceforth, with
orders to complete the work as soon as
possible according to the original speci-
fications. At first Graves had blustered
and threatened to sue if certain vouch-
ers issued by Hart were not paid, but
Wheeler " read the riot act " to him,
and he emerged from the lawyer's office
a subdued and fearful man. The calm
lawyer had a long arm, which reached
far into the city, and he frightened the
contractor. So Graves was allowed to
complete the contract. Whatever parts
of his work had been done crookedly,
he was to rectify as far as was possible,
and Trimble was to see that the con-
struction which remained to be done
came up to specification. As for the
irrevocable, the bad work already accept-
ed and paid for, the lawyer said nothing.
Thus the man of the world, the per-
fectly cynical lawyer, had his way,
which was, on the whole, the least trouble-
some way for all concerned, and avoided
scandal. He was the calm one of the
men involved : it was his business to
make arrangements with human weak-
ness and frailty and to " avoid scandal."
That, at all costs !
He made his cousin no reproaches.
" We 've nipped your claws, young
man ! " he admonished him.
He was disappointed in Jackson.
Privately he considered him a dun-
derheaded ass, who had weakly given
himself as a tool to the contractor. In
his dealings with men, he had known
many rascals, more than the public was
aware were rascals, and he respected
some of them. But they were the men,
who, once having committed themselves
to devious ways, used other men as
their tools. For little, foolish rascals, who
got befogged and " lost their nerve," he
had only contempt.
" How 's your wife ? " he asked
brusquely. " That was a dirty blow she
got, — straight between the eyes ! I
never thought she 'd come here that af-
ternoon."
" Helen has gone east with the boys
and her mother, — to that place in
Vermont. She needs the rest."
" Oh, um, I see," the lawyer com-
mented, comprehending what this jour-
ney meant. He was surprised that
Helen should desert her husband at this
crisis. It was the part of a woman
who had character to " back her hus-
band," no matter what he might do, so
long as he was faithful to his marriage
oath. Jackson had been a fool, like so
many men ; there was trouble in the air,
and she had run away ! He would not
have thought it of her.
Hart swallowed his humiliation be-
fore his cousin. He was much relieved
at the outcome of the affair ; it released
him from further responsibility for the
school, which had become hateful to
him. He was chiefly concerned, now,
lest the difficulty with the trustees
should become known and hurt his repu-
tation ; especially, lest the men in his
office, to whom he was an autocrat and
a genius, should suspect something. He
began at once to push the work on the
last details for the hotel, with the hope of
forcing Graves to deliver another block
of the " stock," which he argued was
due him for commission.
Now that the matter had been quietly
adjusted without scandal, he was in-
clined to feel more aggrieved than ever
over his wife's departure. " She might
have waited to see how it turned out,"
he repeated to himself, obstinately re-
fusing her the right to judge himself
except where his acts affected her di-
rectly. For some time he kept up with
acquaintances the fiction of Helen's
" visit in the east ; " he even took a room
at the Shoreham Club for the hunting
season. But he soon fancied that the
people at the club were cool to him ;
fewer engagements came his way ; no
one referred to the great building, which
The Common Lot.
759
had given him reputation ; the men he
had known best seemed embarrassed
when he joined them, — men, too, who
would not have winked an eye at a
" big coup" The women soon ceased
to ask about Helen ; it was getting abroad
that there was something wrong with
the Jackson Harts. For it had leaked,
more or less : such matters always will
leak. One man drops a word to his
neighbor, and the neighbor's wife pieces
that to something she has heard or sur-
mised.
So Hart gave up his room at the
club, where his raw self-consciousness
was too often bruised. Then, finding
his empty house in the city insupport-
able, he went to live with his mother in
his uncle's old home. There was a lull
in building at this time, due to the in-
terminable strikes, but fortunately he
could keep himself busy with the hotel
and a large country house in the centre
of the state", which took him often away
from the city.
Helen wrote to him from time to time,
filling her letters with details about the
boys. She suggested that they should
return to the city to visit their grand-
mother during the Christmas holidays.
She never referred to their own situation,
apparently considering that he had it in
his power to end it when he would. He
was minded often when he received these
letters to write her sternly in reply, set-
ting forth the wrong which in her obsti-
nacy she was doing to herself and their
children. He went over these imaginary
letters in his idle moments, working out
their phrases with great care : they had
a fine, dignified ring to them, the toler-
ant and condoning note. But when he
tried to write he did not get very far
with them. Sometimes he thought of
writing simply : " I love you very much,
Nell ; I want you back ; can you not for-
give me ? " But he knew well that he
could not merely say, " I have done
wrong, forgive me," if he would affect
that new will in his wife, so gently stern !
Even if he could bring himself to con-
fess his dishonesty, that would not suffice.
There was another and deeper gulf be-
tween them, one that he could not clearly
fathom. " From the very beginning we
have lived wrongly," she had cried that
last time. " We can never go on the same
way." . . . No, he was not ready to accept
her judgment of him !
Thus the winter wore away, forlornly,
and early in April the first hint of spring
came into the dirty city. On a Sunday
afternoon the architect went to call on
his old friend Mrs. Phillips, who was one
of the few persons who gave him any
comfort these days. He found her cut-
ting the leaves of an art journal.
"There's an article here about that
German, you know, the one we are all
trying to help," she said, giving him a
hand. "I have taken to patronizing the
arts : it 's pleasanter than charities. I
have graduated from philanthropy. And
you have to do something nowadays, if
you want to keep up."
She spoke with her usual bluntness,
and then added a little cant in a conven-
tional tone : —
"And I think we who have the time
and the position should do something to
help these poor artists, who are strug-
gling here in this commercial city. Peo-
ple won't buy their pictures ! , . . But
what is the matter with you ? You look
as if you had come to the end of every-
thing. I suppose it 's the old story. That
cold Puritan wife of yours has gone for
good. It 's no use pretending to me : I
knew from the start how it would be ! "
" But I don't know whether she has
gone for good," he muttered.
"You might as well make up your
mind to it. Two people like you two
can't get along together ! "
" It is n't that," he protested.
" Well, don't mope, whatever you do.
Either go and eat your humble pie, or
arrange for a divorce. You can't go on
this way. Oh, I know all your troubles,
760
The Common Lot.
of course. Has n't that pleasant brother-
in-law of mine been in here rehearsing
that story about the school, — well, what
do you call it ? And he seems to hold
me responsible for the mess, because I
liked you, and gave you your first work.
I did n't corrupt you, did I ? "
The architect moved uneasily. The
widow's levity displeased him, and roused
his anger afresh against the trustees.
" I don't know what rot Judge Phil-
lips has been telling you, but " —
" Come ! " she interrupted him in his
defense ; "sit down here by me and let
me talk to you. You know me well
enough to see that I don't care what
the judge says. But I have something
to say to you"
She made a place for him on the lounge,
and tossed him a pillow to make him
comfortable. Then, dropping her review
on the floor, she locked her fingers be-
hind her head, and looked searchingly at
the man.
" I don't know what you have been up
to, and I don't care. Harrison always
said I had n't any moral sense, and I
suppose I have n't, of his sort. You
should have had your uncle's money, or
a part at any rate, and it 's natural that
you should try to get all you can of it, I
say. But you must have been stupid to
let that old square-toes Pemberton get in
your way ! "
This cynical analysis of the situation
was not precisely salve to the architect's
wound. He was not ready to go as far
as the woman lightly sketched. But he
listened, for the sake of her sympathy,
if for no other reason.
" Now, as I said, there 's no use mop-
ing around here. Pick right up and get
out for a few months. When you come
back, people won't remember what was
the matter. Or, if you still find it chilly,
you can go to New York and start there.
It's no use fighting things out! Bury
them."
She paused to give emphasis to her
suggestion.
" Let your wife play by herself for a
while : it will do her good. When she
hears that you are in Europe, having a
good time, she '11 begin to think she 's
been silly. ... I am going over. I 've
got to rent Forest Manor this summer.
That Harris man went wrong the last
time he advised me, and got me into all
sorts of trouble, — industrials. Venetia
pensions me ! She won't go abroad, but
she kindly gives me what she thinks I
ought to spend. I sail on the Kronprinz,
the 20th of next month ! "
The invitation to him was implied in
the pause that followed. The gleam in
Hart's eyes showed his interest in her
suggestion, but he said nothing.
" There 's nothing to do in your busi-
ness, as you said, and you should give
these good people a chance to forget !
We could have a good time over there.
You could buy things and sell them here,
and make your expenses that way, easily.
You know all the nice little'places, and
if Maida and her husband come over we
could take an auto and do them. Think
of Italy in May ! "
She unclasped her hands and leaned
forward, resting one arm on the cush-
ioned back of the lounge, and thus re-
vealing a very pretty forearm and wrist.
Two little red spots of enthusiasm glowed
in her cheeks. What life and vitality
at forty-three ! the man thought, smiling
appreciatively into her face. For the
first time she moved him emotionally.
He was lonely, miserable, and thoroughly
susceptible to such charm as she had.
" It would be awfully pleasant," he re-
plied, leaning toward her, " to get away
from this place, with you ! " . . .
His hand slipped to her beautiful arm.
At that moment Venetia came into the
room, unnoticed by the two on the
lounge. She stood for a little while
watching them, and then, with a smile
on her expressive lips, noiselessly with-
drew.
" Well, wire for a passage to-morrow,"
Mrs. Phillips murmured.
The Common Lot.
761
There was nothing more, nothing that
would have offended the most scrupulous,
for the architect was essentially healthy-
minded. In a lonely moment he might
satisfy the male need for sympathy by
philandering with a pretty woman, who
soothed his bruised egotism. But he did
not have that kind of weakness, the wo-
man weakness. A few minutes later he
was leaving the room, saying as he looked
into Louise Phillips's brown eyes, —
" I think you are right. I need to
get away from this town and rest my
nerves."
" When you come back people will be
only too glad to see you. They don't
remember their scruples long."
" There is n't anything for them to
worry over! "
" The Kronprinz, then ! "
In the hall he met Venetia, who was
slowly coming down the stairs, wrapped
in a long cloak. She hesitated a mo-
ment, then continued to descend.
"Hello, Venetia! " Hart called out.
She swept down the remaining steps
without replying, her eyes shining hotly.
As she passed him, she turned and shot
one word full in his face, — " Cad ! "
XXIII.
The girl's word was like a blow in the
face. It toppled over any self-compla-
cency that had survived these last disin-
tegrating months. Was he as mean a
thing as that ? So little that a girl whom
he had always treated with jovial conde-
scension might insult him, unprovoked ?
Probably others, all those people whose
acquaintance he valued, had a like con-
tempt for him. At first he did not resent
their judgment ; he was too much dazed.
In this plight he walked south on the
avenue, without minding where he was
going, and then turned west, automati-
cally, at Twenty-Second Street, walking
until he came to the region of dance-halls
and flashy saloons. In this unfamiliar
neighborhood there was a glare of light
from the great electric signs which deco-
rated the various places of resort. The
street was crowded with men and women
loitering about the saloons and dance-
halls, enjoying the fitful mildness of the
April evening. At this early hour there
were more women than men on the street,
and their dresses of garish spring col-
ors, their loud, careless voices, and air
of reckless ease, reminded the architect
faintly, very faintly, of the boulevards
he had loved in his happy student years.
In this spot of the broad city there flour-
ished coarse license, and the one necessity
was the price of pleasure. The scene
distracted his mind from the sting of the
girl's contempt.
He entered one of the larger saloons
on the corner of an avenue, and sat down
at a small table. When the waiter dart-
ed to him, and, impudently leering into
his face across the table, asked, " What's
yours, gent ? " he answered quickly,
" Champagne ! Bring me a bottle and
ice." His heavy heart craved the amber
wine, which, in association at least, heart-
ens man. At the tables all about him
sat the women of the neighborhood,
large-boned and heavy creatures, drink-
ing beer by themselves, or taking cham-
pagne with stupid-looking, rough men,
probably buyers and sellers of stock at
the Yards, which were not far away.
The women had the blanched faces of
country girls over whom the city has
passed like the plates of a mighty roller.
The men had the tan of the distant prai-
ries, from which they had come with their
stock. They had set themselves to de-
liberate debauch that should last for days,
— as long as the " wad " held out and
the brute lust in their bodies remained
unquenched.
Presently the waiter returned with the
heavy bottle and slopped some of the
wine into a glass. The architect raised
it and drank. It was execrable, sweetened
stuff, but he drank the glass at a draught,
and poured another and drank it. The
762
The Common Lot.
girl's inexplicable insult swept over him
afresh in a wave of anger. He should
find a way to call her to account. . . .
" Say, Mister, you don't want to drink
all that wine by yourself, do you ? "
A woman at the next table, who was
sitting by herself before an empty beer-
glass, and smoking a cigarette, had
spoken to him in a furtive voice.
" Come over, then ! " he answered,
roughly pushing a chair to the table.
" Here, waiter, bring another glass."
The woman slid, rather than walked,
to the chair by his side, and drank the
champagne like a parched animal. He
ordered another bottle.
" Enjoying yourself ? " she inquired
politely, having satisfied her first thirst.
" Been in the city long ? I ain't seen
you here at Dove's before."
He looked at her with languid curios-
ity. She recalled to him the memory of
her Paris sisters, with whom he had shared
many a consommation in those blessed
days that he had almost forgotten. But
she had none of the sparkle, the human
charm of her Latin sisters. She was a
mere coarse vessel, and he wondered at
the men who sought joy in her.
" Where do you come from ? " he de-
manded.
" Out on the coast. San Diego 's my
home. But I was in Philadelphia last
winter. I guess I shall go back to the
East pretty soon. I don't like Chicago
much, — it 's too rough out here to suit
me."
She found Chicago inferior ! He
laughed with the humor of the idea. It
was a joke he should like to share with
his respectable friends. They drank and
talked while the evening sped, and he
plied her with many questions in idle
curiosity, touched with that interest in
women of her class which most men
have somewhere in the dregs of their
natures. She chattered volubly, willing
enough to pay for her entertainment.
As he listened to her, this creature of
the swift instants, whose only perception
was the moment's sensation, he grew
philosophical. The other world, his
proper world of care and painful fore-
thought, faded from his vision. Here
in Dove's place he was a thousand miles
from the respectabilities in which he had
his being. Here alone in the city one
might forget them : nothing mattered, —
his troubles, his wife's judgment of him,
the girl's contempt.
He had loosened that troublesome coil
of things, which lately had weighed him
down. It seemed easy enough to cut
himself free from it and walk the earth
once more unhampered, like these, the
flotsam of the city.
" Come ! Let 's go over to Grinsky's
hall," the woman suggested, noticing the
architect's silence, and seeing no imme-
diate prospect of another bottle of wine.
" We '11 find something doing over there,
sure ! "
But he was already tired of the
woman ; she offended his cultivated sen-
sibilities. So he shook his head, paid
for the wine, said good-evening to her,
and started to leave the place. She fol-
lowed him, talking volubly, and when
they reached the street she took his arm,
clinging to him with all the weight of her
dragging will.
" You don't want to go home yet,"
she coaxed. " You 're a nice gentleman !
Come in here to Grinsky's and give me
a dance."
Her entreaties disgusted him. People
on the street looked and smiled. At the
bottom he was a thoroughly clean-minded
American : he could not even coquette
with debauch without shame and timid-
ity. She and her class were nauseating
to him, like evil-smelling rooms and foul
sights. That was not his vice !
He paid for her admission to the dance-
hall, dropped a dollar in her hand, and
left her. Then where to go ? How to
pass the hours ? He was at an utter loss
what to do with himself, like all proper-
ly married, respectable American men,
when the domestic pattern of their lives
The Common Lot.
763
is disturbed for any reason. He began
to stroll east in the direction of the lake,
taking off his hat to let the night wind
cool his head. He found walking plea-
sant in the mild spring air, and when
he came to the end of the street he
turned south into a deserted avenue that
was starred in the dark night by a line
of arc lamps. It was a dull, respectable,
middle-class district, quite unfamiliar to
him, and he stared inquiringly at the
monotonous blocks of brick houses and
cheap apartment buildings. Here was
the ugly, comfortable housing of the
modern city, where lived a mass of good
citizens, — clerks and small business men.
He wondered vaguely if this was what
his wife would have them come to, this
dreary monotony of small homes, each
one like its neighbor, where the two main
facts of existence were shelter and food !
A wave of self-pity swept over him,
and his thoughts returned to his old
grievance : if his wife had stayed by
him all would have been well. He
wanted his children ; he wanted his
home, his wife, his neighbors, his little
accustomed world of human relation-
ships, — all as it had been before. And
he blamed her for destroying this, shut-
ting his mind obstinately to any other
consideration, unwilling to admit even to
his secret self that his greed, his thirsty
ambition, had aught to do with the case.
He had striven with all his might, even
as the bread-winners in these houses
strove daily, to get a point of vantage in
the universal struggle. They doubtless
had their modicum of content, while he
had missed his reward. That heavy
weight of depression, which the wine
had dissipated temporarily, returned to
oppress his spirits.
He must have walked many blocks
on this avenue between the monotonous
small houses. In the distance beyond
him to the south, he saw a fiery glow in
the soft heavens, which he took to be the
nightly reflection from the great blast
furnaces of the steel works in South
Chicago. Presently he emerged upon
a populous cross street, and the light
seemed nearer, and, unlike the soft efful-
gence from the blast furnaces, the red
sky was streaked with black. On the cor-
ners of the street there was an unwonted
excitement, — men gaping upwards at
the fiery cloud, then running eastward,
in the direction of the lake. From the
west there sounded the harsh gong of a
fire-engine, which was pounding rapidly
down the car tracks. It came, rocking
in a whirlwind of galloping horses and
swaying men. The crowd on the street
broke into a run, streaming along the
sidewalks in the wake of the engine.
The architect woke from his dead
thoughts and ran with the crowd. Two,
three, four blocks, they sped toward
the lake, which curves eastward at this
point, and as he ran, the street became
strangely familiar to him. The crowd
turned south along a broad avenue that
led to the park. Some one cried, " There
it is ! It 's the hotel ! " A moment more,
and the architect found himself at the
corner of the park opposite the lofty
hotel, out of whose upper stories b^oad
billows of smoke, broken by sheets of
flame, were pouring.
There, in the corner made by the bou-
levard and the park, where formerly was
the weedy ruin, rose the great building,
which Graves had finished late in the
winter, and had turned over to the hotel
company. Its eight stories towered loft-
ily above the houses and apartments in
the neighborhood. The countless win-
dows along the broad front gleamed
portentously with the reflection from the
flames above. At the west corner, over-
looking the park, above a steep ascent of
flaunting bay windows, there floated a
light blue pennon, bearing a name in
black letters, — THE GLENMORE.
At first the architect scarcely realized
that this building, which was burning,
was Graves's hotel, his hotel. Already
the police had roped off the street be-
764
The Common Lot.
neath the fire, in which the crowd was
thickening rapidly. All about the place,
for a space of two blocks, could be heard
the throbbing engines, and the shrill whis-
tling with which they answered one an-
other. The fire burned quietly aloft in
the sky above their heads, while below
there was the clamor of excited men and
screeching engines. The dense crowd
packed ever closer, and surged solidly
toward the fire lines, bearing the archi-
tect in the current.
" They 've pulled the third alarm," one
man said, chewing excitedly on a piece
of gum. " There 's fifty people in there
yet."
" They say the elevators are going ! "
another one exclaimed.
" Where 's the fire-escapes ? "
" Must be on the rear or over by the
alley. There ain't none this side sure
enough."
" Yes, they 're in back," the architect
said authoritatively.
He tried to think just where they were
and where they opened in the building,
but could not remember. A voice wailed
dismally through a megaphone, —
" Look out, boys ! Back ! "
On the edge of the cornice appeared
three little figures with a line of hose.
At that height they looked like willing
gnomes on the crust of a flaming world.
" Gee ! Look at that roof ! Look at
it!"
The cry from the megaphone had come
too late. Suddenly, without warning,
the top of the hotel rose straight into the
air, and in the sky above there was a
great report, like the detonation of a can-
non at close range. The roof had blown
up. For an instant darkness followed, as
if the flame had been smothered, snuffed
out. Then, with a mighty roar, the pent-
up gases that had caused the explo'sion
ignited, and burst forth in a broad sheet
of beautiful blue flame, covering the
doomed building with a crown of fire.
Hart looked for the men with the hose.
One had caught on the sloping roof of
a line of bay windows, and clung there
seven stories above the ground.
" He 's a goner ! " some one groaned.
Large strips of burning tar paper be-
gan to float above the heads of the crowd,
causing a stampede. In the rush. Hart
got nearer the fire lines, more immedi-
ately in front of the hotel, which irre-
sistibly drew him closer. Now he could
hear the roar of the flame as it swept
through the upper stories and streamed
out into the dark night. The fierce light
illumined the silk streamer, which still
waved from the pole at the corner of the
building, untouched by the explosion.
Across the east wall, under the cornice,
was painted the sign : THE GLENMORE
FAMILY HOTEL ; and beneath, in letters
of boastful size, FIREPROOF BUILDING.
The policeman at the line pointed de-
risively to the legend with his billy.
" Now ain't that fireproof ! "
" Burns like rotten timber ! " a man
answered.
It was going frightfully fast ! The
flames were now galloping through the
upper stories, sweeping the lofty struc-
ture from end to end, and smoke had be-
gun to pour from many points in the
lower stories, showing that the fount of
flame had its roots far down in the heart
of the building. Vague reports circu-
lated through the crowd : — A hundred
people or more were still in the hotel.
All were out. Thirty were penned in
the rear rooms of the sixth floor. One
elevator was still running. It had been
caught at the time of the explosion, etc.
For the moment the firemen were making
their fight in the rear, and the north front
was left in a splendid peace of silent flame
and smoke, — a spectacle for the crowd
in the street.
Within the massive structure, the
architect realized vaguely, there was be-
ing enacted one of those modern trage-
dies which mock the pride and vanity
of man. In that furnace human be-
ings were fighting for their lives, or,
penned in, cut off by the swift flames,
The Common Lot.
765
were waiting in delirious fear for aid
that was beyond the power of men to
give them. A terrible horror clutched
him. It was his building which was
being eaten up like grass before the flame.
He dodged beneath the fire line and be-
gan to run toward the east end, with an
idea that in some way he could help. It
was his building ; he knew it from cor-
nice to foundation ; he might know how
to get at those within ! A policeman
seized him roughly and thrust him back
behind the line. He fought his way to
the front again, while the dense crowd el-
bowed and cursed him. He lost his hat ;
his coat was torn from his shoulders.
But he struggled frantically forward.
"You here, Hart! What are you
after ? "
Some one stretched out a detaining
hand and drew him out of the press. It
was Cook, his draughtsman. Cook was
chewing gum, his jaws working nervous-
ly, grinding and biting viciously in his
excitement. The fierce glare revealed
the deep lines of the man's face.
" You can't get out that way. It 's
packed solid ! " Cook bellowed into his
ear. " God alive, how fast it 's going !
That 's your steel frame, tile partition,
fireproof construction, is it ? To hell
with it ! "
Suddenly he clutched the architect's
arm again and shouted, —
" Where are the east-side fire-escapes ?
I can't see nothing up that wall, can
you?"
The architect peered through the
wreaths of smoke. There should have
been an iron ladder between each tier of
bays on this side of the building.
" They are all in back," he answered,
remembering now that the contractor had
cut out those on the east wall as a " dis-
figurement." " Let 's get around to the
rear," he shouted to the draughtsman,
his anxiety whipping him once more.
After a time they managed to reach
an alley at the southwest angle of the
hotel, where two engines were pumping
from a hydrant. Here they could see
the reach of the south wall, up which
stretched the spidery lines of a solitary
fire-escape. Cook pointed to it in mute
wonder and disgust.
" It 's just a question if the beams will
hold into the walls until they can get all
the folks out," he shouted. " I heard
that one elevator boy was still running
his machine and taking 'em out. As
long as the floors hold together he can
run his elevator. But don't talk to me
about your fireproof hotels ! Why, the
bloody thing ain't been burning twenty
minutes, and look at it ! "
As he spoke there was a shrill whistle
from the fire marshal, and then a wrench-
ing, crashing, plunging noise, like the
sound of an avalanche. The upper part
of the east wall had gone, toppling out-
ward into the alley, like the side of a rot-
ten box. In another moment followed a
lesser crash. The upper floors had col-
lapsed, slipping down into the inner gulf
of the building. There was a time of
silence and awful quiet ; but almost im-
mediately the blue flames, shot with or-
ange, leaped upwards once more. From
the precipitous wall above, along the line
of the fire-escape, came horrid human
cries, and through the smoke and flame
could be seen a dozen figures clinging
here and there like insects to the window
frames.
Cook swayed against the architect like
a man with nausea.
" They 're done for now, sure, all that
ain't out. And I guess there ain't many
out. It just slumped, just slumped," he
repeated with a nervous quiver of the
mouth. Suddenly he turned his pale
face to the architect and glared into his
eyes.
" Damn you ! you — ! "he stammered,
shaking his fist at him. " There were n't
any steel in the thing ! It was rotten
cheese. That 's you, you, you ! " He
turned and ran toward the burning mass,
distracted, shouting, as he ran, " Rotten
cheese ! Just rotten cheese ! "
766
The Common Lot.
But the architect stayed there in the
alley, rooted in horror, stupefied. High
above him, in a window of the south wall,
which was still untouched by the fire, he
saw a woman standing on the narrow
ledge of the brick sill. She clung with
one hand to an awning rope and put the
other before her eyes. He shouted some-
thing to her, but he could not hear the
sound of his own voice. She swayed back
and forth, and then as a swirl of flame
shot up in the room behind her, she fell
forward into the abyss of the night. . . .
A boy's face appeared at one of the lower
windows. He was trying to break the
pane of heavy glass. Finally he smashed
a hole with his fist, and stood there, dazed,
staring down into the alley ; then he
dropped backwards into the room, and a
jet of smoke poured from the vent he
had made.
In front of the hotel there were fresh
shouts : they were using the nets. The
architect covered his face with his hands,
and, moaning to himself, began to run, to
flee from the horrible spot. But a cry
arrested him, a wail of multitudinous
voices, which rose above the throb of the
engines, the crackle of the fire, the clam-
or of the catastrophe. He looked up once
more to the fire-eaten ruin. The lofty
south wall, hitherto intact, had begun to
waver along the east edge. It tottered,
hung, then slid backwards, shaking off
the figures on the fire-escape as if they
had been frozen flies. ... In the avenue
he heard the crowd groaning with rage
and pity. As he ran he saw beside the
park a line of ambulances and patrol wag-
ons ready for their burdens.
How long he ran, or in what direction,
he never knew. He had a dim memory
of himself, sitting in some place with a
bottle of whiskey before him. The liq-
uor seemed to make no impression on his
brain. His hand still shook with the pa-
ralysis of fear. He remembered his ef-
forts to pour the whiskey into the glass.
After a time a face, vaguely familiar, en-
tered his nightmare, and the man, who
carried a little black bag, such as doctors
use, sat down beside him and shouted at
him : —
" What are you doing here ? What
do you want with that whiskey ? Give
it to me. You have had all the booze
that 's good for you, I guess."
And in his stupor he said to the man
tearfully : —
" Don't take it away, doctor ! For
heaven's sake, don't take the whiskey
away ! I tell you, I have killed people
to-night. Eight, ten, forty, — no, I killed
eight people. Yes, eight men and wo-
men. I see 'em dying now. Give me
the whiskey ! "
" You 're off your nut, man ! " the doc-
tor replied impatiently. " You have n't
killed any one. You have been boozing,
and you '11 kill yourself, if you don't
quit. Here, give me that ! "
He remembered rising to his feet obe-
diently and saying very solemnly : —
" Very well, my friend, I won't drink
any more if you say so. But listen to
me ! I killed a lot of people, eight of
'em, and I don't know how many more
beside. Over there in a great fire. I
saw 'em dying, like flies, like flies. Now
give me one more drink ! "
" All right, you killed 'em, if you say
so!"
" Don't leave me, doctor ! It 's a ter-
rible thing to kill so many people, all at
once, like flies, like flies ! "
And he burst into tears, sobbing and
shaking with the awful visions of his
brain, his head buried in his arms.
XXIV.
The next morning Hart found himself
on a sofa in a bare, dusty room that
looked as if it was a doctor's office. He
sat up and tried to think what had hap-
pened to him overnight. Suddenly the
picture of the burning hotel swept across
his mind, and he groaned with a fresh
The Common Lot.
767
sense of the sharp pain. Some one was
whistling in the next room, and presently
the door opened, and Dr. Coburn ap-
peared in trousers and undershirt, mop-
ping his face with a towel.
" Hello, Jack Hart ! " he called out
boisterously. " How are you feeling ?
Kind of dopey ? My, but you were full
of booze last night! I had to jam a
hypodermic into you to keep you quiet,
when I got you over here. Do you get
that way often ? "
" Was I drunk ? " the architect asked
dully.
" Well, I rather think ! Don't you
feel it this morning ? "
He grinned at the disheveled figure on
the sofa, and continued to mop his face.
"You were talking dotty, too, about
killing folks. I thought maybe you might
have a gun on you. But I could n't find
anything. What have you been do-
ing?"
" It was the fire," Hart answered
slowly, " a terrible fire ! People were
killed, — I saw them. My God ! it was
awful ! "
He buried his face in his hands and
shuddered.
" Shook you up considerable, did it ?
Here, wait a minute ! I '11 fix you some-
thing."
The doctor went back into the inner
room, and returned with a small glass.
" Drink this. It will give you some
nerve."
The architect took the stimulant and
lay down once more with his face to the
wall. Presently he pulled himself to-
gether and drank a cup of coffee which
the doctor had prepared. Then he took
himself off, saying that he must get to
his office at once. He went away in a
daze, barely thanking the doctor for his
kindness. When he had left, Coburn be-
gan to whistle again, thinking, " There 's
something more 'n drink or that fire the
matter with him ! "
Hart bought a newspaper at the first
stand. It was swelled with pages of
coarse cuts and "stories " of the " Glen-
niore Hotel Tragedy." On the elevated
train, which he took to reach the city,
the passengers were buried in the volu-
minous sheets of their newspapers, avidly
sucking in the details of the disaster.
For a time he stared at the great cut on
the first page of his paper, which pur-
ported to represent the scene at the fire
when the south wall fell in. But in its
place he saw the sheer stretch of the piti-
less wall, the miserable figures on the iron
ladder being swept into the flames. Then
he read the headlines of the account of
the fire. Seventeen persons known to
have been in the hotel were missing ; the
bodies of ten had been found. Had it
not been for the heroism of a colored
elevator boy, Morris by name, who ran
his car up and down seven times through
the burning shaft, the death list would
have been far longer. On the second
trip, so the account ran, the elevator had
been caught by a broken gate on the third
floor. Morris had coolly run the car up
to the top, then opened his lever to full
speed, and crashed his way triumphantly
through the obstacle. It was one of those
acts of unexpected intelligence, daring,
and devotion to duty, which bring tears
to the eyes of thousands all over the land.
The brave fellow had been caught in the
collapse of the upper floors, and his body
had not yet been found. It was buried
under tons of brick and iron in the
wrecked building.
The newspaper account wandered on,
column after column, repeating itself
again and again, confused, endlessly pro-
lix, but in the waste of irrelevancy a few
facts slowly emerged. The Glenmore,
fortunately, had been by no means full.
It had been opened only six weeks before
as a family hotel, — one of those shoddy
places where flock young married people,
with the intention of avoiding the cares
of children and the trials of housekeeping
in modest homes ; where there is music
twice a week and dancing on Saturdays ;
768
The Common Lot.
where the lower windows are curtained
by cheap lace bearing large monograms,
and electric candles and carnations are
provided for each table in the dining-
room. Another year from this time there
would have been three hundred people
in the burning tinder-box.
The fire had started somewhere in the
rear of the second floor, from defective
electric wiring, it was supposed, and had
shot up the rear elevator shaft, which had
no pretense of fireproof protection. The
east wall had bulged almost at once, pull-
ing out the supports for the upper three
floors. It was to be doubted whether the
beams, bearing-walls, and main partitions
were of fireproof materials. The charred
remains of Georgia pine and northern
spruce seemed to 'indicate that they were
not. At any rate, the incredible rapidity
with which the fire had spread, and the
dense smoke, showed that the " fireproof-
ing" was of the flimsiest description.
And, to cap all, there was but one small
fire-escape on the rear wall, difficult of
access ! " The Glenmore," so the Chi-
cago Thunderer pronounced, " was no-
thing but an ornamental coffin."
Editorially, the Thunderer had al-
ready begun its denunciation of the build-
ing department for permitting a contrac-
tor to erect such an obvious " fire-trap,"
and for giving the lessees a license to
open it as a hotel. There had been too
many similar horrors of late, — the lodg-
ing-house on West Polk Street, where five
persons had lost their lives, the private
hospital on the North Side, where four-
teen men and women had been burned,
etc. In all these cases it was known that
the building ordinances had been most
flagrantly violated. There was the usual
clamor for " investigation," for " locating
the blame," and " bringing the real cul-
prits before the Grand Jury." It should
be said that the Thunderer was opposed
politically to the City Hall.
In the architect's office there was an
air of subdued excitement. No work was
in progress when Hart let himself into his
private room from the hall. Instead, the
men were poring over the broad sheets
of the newspapers spread out on the ta-
bles. When he stepped into the draught-
ing-room, they began awkwardly to fold
up the papers and start their work. Cook,
Hart noticed, was not there. The steno-
grapher came in from the outer office and
announced curtly, —
" The 'phone 's been ringing every
minute, Mr. Hart." She looked at the
architect with mingled aloofness and
curiosity. " They were mostly calls from
the papers, and some of the reporters are
in there now, waiting. What shall I say
to 'em ? "
" Say I am out of town," Hart ordered,
giving the usual formula when reporters
called at the office. Then he went back
to his private room and shut the door.
He put the bulky newspaper on his desk
and tried to think what he should do.
There were some memoranda on the desk
of alterations which he was to make in
a country house, and these he took up
to examine. Soon his desk telephone
rang, and when he put the receiver to
his ear, Graves's familiar tones came
whispering over the line. The contractor
talked through the telephone in a subdued
tone, as if he thought to escape eavesdrop-
ping at the central office by lowering his
voice.
" Is that you, Hart ? Where have
you been ? I 've been trying to get you
all the morning ! Say, can't you come
over here quick ? "
" What do you want ? " the architect
demanded sharply. The sound of the
man's voice irritated him.
" Well, I want a good many things,"
Graves replied coldly. " I guess we had
better get together on this business pretty
soon."
" You can find me over here the rest
of the morning," Hart answered curtly.
There was a pause of several seconds,
and then the contractor telephoned cau-
tiously : —
The Common Lot.
769
"Say, I can't leave. That Dutch-
man 's in here pretty drunk, and I don't
want him to get loose. Come over,
quick ! "
"All right," the architect muttered
dully, hanging up his telephone. He was
minded to refuse, but he realized that it
would he best to see what was the matter.
Van Meyer was one of the officers and
directors of the Glenmore Hotel Corpo-
ration. The architect and a couple of
clerks in the contractor's office were the
other dummies in this corporation, which
had been organized solely to create bonds
and stock, and to escape personal liability.
Hart gathered up the memoranda on
his desk, and, telling the stenographer
that he was going out to Eversley to see
the Dixon house, he left the office. As
he stepped into the hall, he met Cook,
who had just come from the elevator.
He nodded to the draughtsman, and
hailed a descending car.
" Say, Hart," Cook said in a quiet
voice, " can I have a word with you ? "
Hart stepped back into the hall and
waited to hear what the draughtsman
had to say.
" I must have been pretty near crazed
last night, I guess," Cook began, turning
his face away from the architect, " and
I said things I had no call to say."
" Come in," Hart said, unlocking the
door to his private office.
" Of course, it was n't my business any-
way," Cook continued, " to accuse you,
no matter what happened. But I saw a
friend of mine this morning, a man on
the Thunderer, and he had just come
from the city hall, where he 'd been to
see the Glenmore plans. He says they 're
all right ! Same as ours in the office.
I can't understand what happened to the
old thing, unless Graves — Well, that 's
not our business."
There was a pause, while the two men
stood and looked at each other. Final-
ly, Cook said, —
" So I wanted to tell you I was wrong,
— I had no call to talk that way ! "
VOL. xcm. — NO. 560. 49
" That 's all right, Cook," the archi-
tect replied slowly. Somehow the man's
apology hurt him more than his curses.
They still stood waiting. Suddenly
Hart said, —
" You need n't apologize, man ! The
plans are all right. But that does n't let
me out. I knew what Graves was going
to do with 'em. I knew it from the
start."
" What do you say ? " the draughts-
man exclaimed, bewildered.
" The hotel was a job from the start,"
Hart repeated.
There was another pause, which was
broken by Cook.
" Well, I suppose after this you won't
want me any more ? "
" I suppose not," Hart answered in a
colorless tone.
" All right ; I '11 go to-day if you say
so."
" As you please."
And they parted. Cook was an hon-
est, whole-souled man. It was best that
they should part, Hart reflected, as he
went down in the elevator, best for Cook
and for him, too. The draughtsman's
admiration for him had been his daily
incense, and he could not bear having
him about with this matter between them,
even if Cook would stay.
Hart found Graves in his inner office,
while a clerk held at bay a roomful of
men who wanted to get at the contractor.
Graves looked serious, but undisturbed,
manifesting no more emotion than if he
had come from the funeral of a distant
relative.
" It 's a pretty bad mess, ain't it ? "
he said to the architect, offering him a
cigar. " I guess you were right. Those
first story walls weren't solid. They
bulged, and that must have pulled the
whole business down. ... Of course
the papers are hot. They always yap
considerable when anything happens.
They'll spit fire a week or so, and
then forget all about it Everything is
straight over at the city hall. There '11
770
The Common Lot.
be the coroner's inquest, of course. But
he won't find much ! The only bad point
is this cuss Van Meyer. He 's been on a
spree, and if they get hold of him, and
ask him questions at the inquest, he 's
liable to tell all he knows, and more too.
What I want you to do is to take care
of the Dutchman."
" What do you mean to do ? " Hart
asked abruptly.
" Do ? Well, the best thing for all of
us who are connected with the Glenmore
is to be called out of town for two or
three weeks, or so. I have got to go to
Philadelphia to-night. Gotz will be here
to go on the stand if they want to get
after the hotel corporation. They won't
make much out of him ! Now, if you can
take care of the Dutchman " — <
" What do you mean ? "
Graves looked at the architect criti-
cally before answering.
" Don't lose your nerve, Hart. It '11
come out all right. I 've seen my law-
yer this morning, and I know just what
they can do with us, and it ain't much.
They can get after the building depart-
ment, but they 're used to that ! And
they can bring suit against the corpora-
tion, which will do no harm. You keep
out of the way for a while, and you won't
get hurt a particle. Take the Dutchman
up to Milwaukee and drown him. Keep
him drunk, — he 's two thirds full now.
Lucky he came here instead of blabbing
to one of those newspaper fellers ! Keep
him drunk, and ship him up north on
the lakes. By the time he finds his way
back, his story won't be worth telling."
Hart looked at the big mass of a man
before him, and loathed him with all his
being. He wanted to take him by one
of his furry ears and shake the flesh from
his bones. The same impulse that had
prompted him to admit his guilt to Cook,
the impulse to cut loose from the whole
business, cost what it might, was stirring
within him.
" Well ? " Graves inquired.
"I am going to quit," the architect
said, almost involuntarily. " I 'm sick
of the business, and I shan't run away.
You can look after Van Meyer your-
self " —
" Perhaps you 're looking for some
money ? " the contractor sneered.
" No more of yours, I know that ! "
Hart answered, rising from his chair and
taking his hat. " I 'm sick of the whole
dirty job, and if they want me to, I '11
talk, too, I suppose."
" You damned, white-livered sneak !
Ain't you got enough gut in you to sit
tight? You" —
But the contractor was swearing at the
blank wall of his office.
When the architect reached the street
he hesitated. Instead of taking the
train for Eversley, as he had intended to
do, he got on an electric car that ran far
out into the northern suburbs. He kept
saying to himself that he wanted time to
think, that he must " think it out " before
he returned to his office. For he was
not sure that it would be best to stay and
bear the brunt of the investigation which
would surely come, as he had said to the
contractor. He was not clear what good
that would do.
But he did not think. Instead, he
brooded over the vision of the past night,
which beset him. When the car stopped
he got out and walked north along the
lake shore, meaning to reach Eversley in
that way. He was still trying to think,
but saw nothing clearly ; nothing but that
terrible picture of the burning hotel, the
dying men and women. Thus he walked
on and on, still trying to think, to find
himself. . . .
Robert Herrick.
(To be continued.)
At the Grave of Samuel Adams. 771
AT THE GRAVE OF SAMUEL ADAMS.
OLD GRANARY BUKYING-GROUND, BOSTON.
THEY knew the patriot rebel's soul,
Who set his grave upon the verge
Of Boston's busy street, where roll
The vans of traffic and the surge
Of hasting footsteps : not for him
A cedar'd churchyard's blank repose,
Nor tomb in some cathedral dim
Where no bird flies nor free wind blows.
Sam Adams never ask'd to rest :
I cannot think he slumbers here,
But watches with unjaded zest
The stream rush on and disappear ;
He longs to rise and join the strife,
As in the seasons when his breath
Kindled a nation into life ;
He scorns the palsying sloth of death.
Fain would he hear which faction rules,
What men precede in town and state,
And if we guard our public schools,
And keep our courts inviolate.
He whispers, " We for Freedom fought,
Have you the love of Freedom still ?
Has Wealth not pauperiz'd your thought,
Nor Power bred the wolfish will ?
" You hurry by — what errands call ?
Service to heart, or head, or purse ?
Shed you a freeman's boon on all,
Or shape a subtler tyrant's curse?
We number'd but a little clan
Beside your million-teeming press,
Yet wrought the general good of Man, —
Woe be your meed, if you do less ! "
William Roscoe Thayer.
772
The Ethics of Taxation.
THE ETHICS OF TAXATION.
THE remark that Goldsmith in one of
his essays lets drop apropos of the his-
tory of a tavern is essentially true of the
history of taxation, — it "is a true pic-
ture of human infirmity," in which " we
see every age equally absurd and equally
vicious." If this seem too disparaging to
the present age, consider for a moment
the most obtrusive features of taxation
in the world of to-day, or, rather, the
most obtrusive features of the tax systems
of the most progressive nations. For,
despite its historical identity with early
taxation, we may no longer designate as
taxation the habit of the Orient, where
taxes are indistinguishable from black-
mail, and where the rich disguise them-
selves in rags to escape the exaction of
the publican. Nor may we longer account
as taxation the archaic methods in vogue
in the land of the Grand Llama, where
the tax-collector, happening upon the
wayfarer, accosts him with complaints of
the cruel rigor of the winter, and, after a
minatory flourish of his matchlock, re-
marks, "Thy cloak, venerable brother."
Process like this is rendered unnecessary
in civilized lands by the proper extension
of indirect taxes.
Instead of allowing the sovereign to
blackmail the subject, we graciously per-
mit the owner of personal property to
determine the amount of his contribu-
tion to the public treasury, much as he
might fix upon the gratuity to his waiter
in a restaurant.
Seriously considered, the justification
offered for indirect taxes is a most curi-
ous commentary upon our system of self-
government. In the United States, for
example, not far from half of the gov-
ernment's total revenue is obtained by
disguising taxes in the prices of mer-
chandise, either duty-paid imports, or
liquors and tobacco freighted with the
weight of the internal revenue. Despite
the incidental advantages such taxes af-
ford in consulting the convenience of the
payer as to the time and the amounts of
particular payments, the great reason for
the existence of these taxes in every coun-
try is their power to conceal from the
governed the real cost of supporting the
government. The people, in whose in-
terest the government supposedly is con-
ducted, must be induced to pay their
taxes in an unconscious condition, " lest at
any time they should see with their eyes,
and hear with their ears, and should un-
derstand with their heart, and should be
converted " to a belief in another than
the dominant programme of expenditure.
If, on the other hand, we look away
from our Federal taxes to our system of
state and local taxation, the crying in-
equalities of the latter are only too well
known. The millionaire Emigre too fre-
quently escapes his just contribution,
while the widow's mite and the orphan's
crust pay the very uttermost farthing.
Had the Lord questioned Mephistopheles
upon the subject of taxation exclusive-
ly, the verdict of " herzlich schlecht "
would have needed but little qualifica-
tion. Adam Smith, the sagacious father
of political economy, saw the situation in
his day, and was sad, but the consolation
that he offered then is about all we have
to-day. " If a nation," said he, " could
not prosper without the enjoyment of
perfect liberty and perfect justice, there
is not in the world a nation which could
have prospered. In the political body,
however, the wisdom of nature has for-
tunately made ample provision for rem-
edying many of the bad effects of the
folly and injustice of man ; in the same
manner as it has done in the natural body
for remedying those of his sloth and in-
temperance."
Whatever the causes for the persistence
of injustice and double dealing in finan-
The JEthics of Taxation.
773
cial administration, one thing is certain,
— that these evils are not due to the ab-
sence of enlightened inquiry into the na-
ture of fiscal problems. One might in
this connection almost echo the remark
made of the mediaeval Italian cities, that
nothing could surpass the excellence of
their treatises on money, or the wretch-
edness of their actual currency. Of the
extreme thoroughness with which the di-
agnosis of the financial status of the body
politic has been made, one is reminded
by the appearence of Dr. Weston's re-
cent volume.1 This work does not im-
port into the discussion any new practi-
cal plan for securing equity in taxation,
for substantial agreement upon the prac-
tical ethics of taxation had long ago been
reached. That taxes cannot properly
be regarded as an insurance premium
paid to the state for protection received,
nor as a commercial equivalent for bene-
fits enjoyed (except in case of special
assessments levied to pay for public im-
provements to private property), — upon
these points there has been for a long
time substantial agreement among seri-
ous students. And, apart from those
obsessed with the idea that society has
no claim upon its members to take aught
in taxes except what society is first al-
leged to have created in the rental values
of land, universal homage has been paid
to the dictum that contributions to pub-
lic needs should be determined by the con-
tributor's ability. This canon of ability
has hitherto been treated as sufficiently
explicit as to the matter of justice in
taxation. Indeed, the ingenuity of the
text-writers has been mainly bestowed
upon finding concrete indicia of ability,
— such as income, property, expenditure,
and the like, — and upon judging extant
tax-laws by their conformity to such
criteria. Very different is Dr. Wes-
ton's inquiry. He has undertaken rather
to show how the principle of justice in
1 Principles of Justice in Taxation. By STE-
PHEN F. WESTON, Ph.D. New York: The
Macmillan Co. 1903.
taxation stands related to what might be
called the metaphysics of finance, and
how the implicates of the science of
finance involve the fundamental theory
of the state and the problem of human
personality. To the economist and doc-
trinaire financiers, accustomed to grovel
here below in the sordid realm of mate-
rial wealth, and all the while disturbed
by the brawling of the market-place, this
aerial flight will prove a much needed
boon. Their lungs need expansion in a
rarefied atmosphere. They need to rub
their eyes and sit up and read that
" taxes are in fact voluntarily paid, even
though the attempt is almost universally
made to evade a part of them, or a pro-
test is made against their amount."
They need to learn that in a broad way
conscious membership in a state implies
acquiescent cooperation in supplying its
needs, and that, therefore, it is proper to
say that taxes are voluntarily paid, in the
Hegelian sense previously referred to in
Dr. Weston's essay, according to which
" the criminal wills his own punishment."
There is here a striking coincidence, one
would think, between the Hegelian and
Pickwickian senses in which propositions
may be understood.
It will doubtless stir the cynic devil in
the blood of the typical economist to
read at the end of sixty-seven pages
of idealistic philosophy Dr. Weston's
triumphant contention that he has de-
monstrated the intimate metaphysical
relationship between Economics and
Ethics. But this again is precisely what
the vast majority of economists need, —
to have the truth seared upon their con-
sciousness that the scientific method of
measuring the utility of wealth, where
previous abstraction has been made of
the moral character of its constituents,
can afford no fundamental basis of pub-
lic policy, and can issue no imperative
word of political guidance. In the face
of the supreme questions the oracles of
expediency are dumb.
But fully to fathom the iniquities that
774
The Ethics of Taxation.
attach to taxation we must leave the
financial experts to their own devices,
and condescend to men of low estate.
It may be that the matter will become
somewhat clearer if we consider the
average taxpayer, first as an exponent
of conservative class prejudice, and sec-
ond as an example of individual frailty.
The first will explain why unsparing re-
form of our system of direct taxation is
so unlikely ; the second will make clear
why our system of direct taxation is so
bad.
The taxpayer is above all things a
conservative animal. Before his name
appeared on the assessor's roll, he was,
like Stevenson's bachelor, " fit for hero-
ism or crime ; " but taxes, like conscience
and matrimony, make cowards of us all.
Let the average citizen interrogate his
own consciousness and ask, " Am I
willing to risk a radical change in our
system of taxation, by which doomage
shall supersede self -assessment, and per-
sonal property in the hands of the holder
be exempted altogether, — this in order
to secure a thoroughgoing reform ? " —
and the answer will almost infallibly be
in the negative. We are determined at
all hazards not " to fly to evils that we
know not of." We must be dragged to
them, if we ever reach them at all.
In a way, it is really remarkable how
certain parables of caution have become
incorporated in the canons of our politi-
cal scriptures. One cannot propose the
smallest innovation, except in accentu-
ating our truculent policy of foreign
aggression, but that our political doc-
tors take us to task by recounting to us
the fable of the Dog and the Bone, and
beseech us not to sacrifice the reality for
the shadow. They never seem to reflect
that a plunge in a clear shining stream
may often be worth the sacrifice of a
dry bone. They are continually exhort-
ing us
" To take the Cash and let the Credit go,"
forgetful of the fact that we really have
little of either, and that normally both
cash and credit go together. It is posi-
tively humiliating to think of the number
of political geese that have purchased
lifelong immunity from the knife by
constantly cackling in our ears the story
of their mythical ancestor who laid the
golden egg. It seems to be forgotten
that, as the late Mr. Whistler would
say, there is only one goose on record
that ever did lay a golden egg, and that
the day of miracles is past.
So it comes that first of all the fear-
some conservatism of the taxpayer is
responsible for the fact that " not one of
the American states has ever adopted
the recommendations of its various ex-
pert Tax Commissions." The farmer
fumes at the proposed exemption of
credits, and the city man is suspicious
of all far-reaching changes proposed in
taxation.
This reluctance to reconstitute the tax-
machinery is the more singular from the
fact that those who are unwilling to risk
a substitute grumble over the imperfec-
tions of the present system as loudly as
the reformer who is bent on radical re-
adjustment. The typical yeoman and
the well-to-do citizen of the lower mid-
dle classes, both of whom through their
frugality own a modest homestead, but
little beyond, will bitterly oppose the ex-
emption of any form of personal prop-
erty. And yet individually they will
often assent to the dictum of the West
Virginia Tax Commission, — a veritable
locus classicus in the literature of tax-
ation, — which declared that " the pay-
ment of the tax on personalty is almost
as voluntary, and is considered pretty
much in the same light as donations to
the neighborhood church or Sunday-
school."
So far as taxation is concerned, our
electorate presents the incongruous spec-
tacle of radical prepossessions coupled
with a paralyzing distrust of all efforts
at amendment. The doctrine of pro-
gressive taxation, that the percentage of
The Ethics of Taxation.
775
taxes should rise as property or income
is greater, is to the man in the street an
axiom. That a man's ability to contrib-
ute to the public chest is more than
doubled when his income is doubled —
a proposition to the classical economist
a stumbling-block, and to the hard-headed
logician foolishness — has to the ordinary
voter of reflective turn of mind the stamp
of self-evident truth. The Philistine as-
sesses lightly the sacrifice of what he
designates superfluous luxuries, which,
under progressive taxation, the well-con-
ditioned classes would have to submit to.
The man of common clay has little ink-
ling of the real pathos of Motley's cry,
"Give us the luxuries of life and we
will dispense with the necessities." He
finds it not a bitter, but an easy thing
to look into the sacrifice of happiness
through another man's eyes. But de-
spite his radical convictions, extreme and
indefensible as they often are, he shakes
his head at any proposed change in our
system either of direct or indirect taxes,
both of which notoriously impose the
heavier relative burdens upon the weaker
shoulders.
But the average taxpayer represents
not only the conservative apathy of his
social class, but another constituency as
well, essentially a pocket-borough, to wit,
himself. Despite the fact that, under the
usual process of assessing real estate,
the taxpayer has comparatively little
power over his assessment, when it comes
to the declaration of personal property, he
has almost unlimited liberty of "writing
himself down," not an ass, but a pauper.
In a sense there is no more curious prob-
lem in social psychology than the way in
which the ordinary taxpayer interprets,
and the degree in which he discharges,
the duty that rests upon him, of contrib-
uting to the expenses of the government.
The elements in the situation, so far as
the taxation of personal property is con-
cerned, are these : the individual is con-
fronted with his duty to an abstract per-
sonality, the government ; he is required
to fill out an inventory of all kinds of
personal property, itemized so minutely
that through its meshes absolutely no
chattel or credit can escape. He is fre-
quently, if not generally, required to de-
clare over his own signature, and not
uncommonly upon oath, that the list re-
turned is complete and literally correct.
Under these circumstances the taxpayer
almost universally commits deliberate
perjury, and omits, or knowingly under-
values, what personal property he pos-
sesses ; and — moral paradox that it is
— thinks none the worse of himself for
it. It has long been a truism among
students of American finance that the
tax on personalty, as various official re-
ports have it, " has in effect become a
tax upon ignorance and honesty," " a
school of perjury promoted by law," " a
premium on perjury and a penalty on
integrity ; " and that, when the tax-
payer's conscience is tender, "virtue is
perforce its own reward."
There is little use in drawing a long
face over this situation, or of saying of
all men at our leisure what the Psalmist
said of them in his haste. The truth is
that what we really need is a new code
or digest of what might be called Deca-
logical Limitations. The leading case,
so far as the commandment of veracity
is concerned, has already been decided
by a learned judge who refused to admit
as proper evidence of a witness's general
reputation for veracity the tax-duplicate
which said witness had returned under
oath. The common sense of mankind
will support this decision. " In lapidary
inscriptions," as Dr. Johnson has de-
clared, " a man is not upon oath."
Nor, we may add, is a fisherman when
questioned as to his catch ; nor a woman,
if one is graceless enough to ask her
age ; nor, of course, a God-fearing bur-
gess when he fills out his tax-bill. Must
one always squat in the dead centre of
verity, and " never hover upon the con-
fines of truth ? " Does not Jove him-
self laugh at lovers' vows? Why all
776
The Ethics of Taxation.
this simulated concern over taxpayers'
oaths ? If " charity is a demand for
beggars," self-assessment is a demand
for perjury. That the supply of either
should fail to be forthcoming would be
an anomaly indeed.
Nor let it be fancied that this vice is
wholly a masculine peccadillo. If one
would see what Lombroso, the Italian
criminologist, calls the Female Offender,
let him but visit the custom house. The
exemplary mother of a family is return-
ing from abroad, and with a ferocity
which quite overpowers the protest of
her husband's " struggling, tasked moral-
ity," she delights to outwit the ferret-
faced inspector on the dock, at the cost
of asseverations which would have put
St. Sapphira herself to the blush.
The conclusion is plain. The law, as
some one has well put it, is such a frag-
ile thing, that when men take it into
their own hands, it is almost sure to get
broken. If we want to continue to have
our tax-laws broken at the expense of
individual veracity, all we have to do
is to continue the present arrangement
of self-assessment or declaration of per-
sonal property.
If it be asked what is the prospect of
an intelligent reform of taxation, the an-
swer must be that the effective impulse
will probably come only from a sensibly
increased pinch of taxation. Peaceful
reforms, like warlike revolutions, crawl
upon their belly. Jeshurun may have
"waxed fat and kicked," but modern
peoples generally reverse the scriptural
order. The Revolution in France and
Chartism in England were the signifi-
cant precursors of the two greatest tax
reforms of modern times. This tendency
of social unrest to unsettle social injus-
tice long antedates our modern demo-
cracies. As far back as the fourteenth
century in England, the author of Piers
Plowman was enough of a political phi-
losopher to observe that, when the fluc-
tuating tide of prosperity is once past,
Demos becomes restless.
" And thanne curseth he the kynge and all his
conseille after,
Suche lawes to loke [enforce] laboreres to
greve."
Fortunate is it for us that the lines upon
which the reform of direct taxes must
proceed have been so clearly marked out,
and that some of our commonwealths
have already taken pronounced steps in
the right direction. The taxation of real
estate by and for the local governments
exclusively, the practical exemption of
credits and chattels in individual hands,
and the relegation both of the adminis-
tration and the proceeds of corporate
taxation to the state governments, fore-
shadow the financial reform to which we
may some time attain.
But if the vision of an equitable sys-
tem of direct taxation seems not im-
possible of realization in the proximate
future, the prospect for a similar adjust-
ment of Federal imposts is as yet be-
clouded and dim. The craft of state
finance and local finance ply the shel-
tered channels of fairly stable and cal-
culable expenditure ; the national ship
of state has to breast the uncharted
waters of international politics and en-
counter the storms of war. When to the
difficult task of providing sums whose
aggregate must vary greatly from year
to year, there is added the additional
task of giving through taxation a con-
stant protective stimulus to certain indus-
tries, the double and often conflicting de-
mands made upon our Federal financiers
are obvious. Were the protective func-
tion of our Federal taxes done away with,
while there would still remain perplexi-
ties great enough in all conscience, one
of the unknown and baffling factors in
the problem would be eliminated.
For over a generation many unselfish
and thoughtful American citizens have
cherished the hope and the aspiration
that the intrinsic injustice of our na-
tional system of taxation might be ex-
tirpated, not at the unreasoning anger of
the victims of its oppression, but at the
Song -Forms of the Thrush.
dictate of an enlightened national con-
science aggrieved at the spoliation too
long perpetuated by law. Difficult it is,
of course,
" To canvass with official breath
The future and the -viewless things ; "
but, looking at the present situation with-
out bias, one is bound to admit that these
hopes of revenue reform seem, if any-
thing, farther from realization to-day
than they were twenty years ago. If
peace has " her victories no less re-
nowned than war," peace has also her
disappointments and her sacrifices, — of
disenchantment, of disillusion, of hope
deferred, — and this is one of them.
Winthrop More Daniels.
SONG-FORMS OF THE THRUSH.
SEVERAI/ years ago, while reading in
an old number of the Atlantic Month-
ly an admirable description by Wilson
Flagg of the song of the hermit thrush,
I came upon the following sentence : " I
have not been able to detect any order
in the succession of these strains, though
some order undoubtedly exists and might
be discovered by long-continued observa-
tion." This suggested §a question : Had
any one ever attempted to solve the old
naturalist's problem ? So far as I could
remember, no one among the hundreds
of observers who had exhausted their vo-
cabularies in descriptions of thrush songs
had made the effort, not even Solomon
Cheney in his delightful Wood Notes
Wild, nor Schuyler Mathews, whose
musical notations of thrush songs were
so accurate and so sympathetic. The
thought flashed upon me that here was
an unoccupied field, a territory into which
perhaps only the most sanguine would
dare to venture, but still a region unex-
plored and alluring in possibilities. Such
a temptation was irresistible, and when
spring brought once more the liquid
sound of wood thrush notes, with the
rarer whispered songs of migrating her-
mits, olive backs, and veeries, I began
my task, not without some misgivings as
to my success, but sure of one thing, —
that, even if the problem proved insolu-
ble, the search itself would be a delight-
ful occupation.
Spring and summer, then, I listened
to thrushes in Ohio, New England, and
Canada ; tramping beside sluggish west-
ern streams or along ravines carved out
of the Ohio plains, scrambling through
New England woods and pastures, climb-
ing mountains in Canada, or rowing
along the rocky shores of northern lakes.
At the outset I encountered a difficulty,
that I never could wholly overcome, in
the problem of determining the form of
the phrases I heard. I had to learn to
ignore all sorts of conflicting sounds, from
the notes of rival singers to locomotive
whistles, to adjust a pitch- pipe to match
a tone held in the memory while the
bird himself was uttering a different
one, and to accustom myself to the occa-
sional sudden introduction by any singer
of new variations in his song. But the
thrushes' delivery was slow, their phrases
were repeated continually, and the tones
themselves were so clear that before long
the matter of recording became some-
what less perplexing, although never
very easy.
But in the process of learning to iden-
tify the songs by the pitch-pipe a new
difficulty appeared in the absence of
any recognized way of representing the
sounds actually uttered by the thrushes.
The birds' pitch was of course entirely
free, whereas the musical staff provided
for only a conventional series of tones
differing by fixed intervals ; and when
778
Song -Forms of the Thrush.
the pitch-pipe faithfully recorded inter-
mediate quarter or eighth tones — that
is, a trifle sharp or flat — there was no
way of representing them. I experi-
mented for a while with various devices,
hoping that I might discover some way
to record the actual sounds, but I finally
abandoned the problem as practically in-
soluble. As the study of the birds' song-
forms progressed I came, however, to
console myself for the lack of exactitude
by the discovery that thrushes tended
steadily to approximate the intervals of
the human scale. They were rarely just
on the key, but they were generally close
to it, never failing to suggest the conven-
tional pitch.
Having determined, then, while recog-
nizing the imperfections of my method
of recording, to use it as a fairly satis-
factory one, I amassed a great number
of thrush song-forms, and from these I
derived the following facts^ noted from
wood thrushes in Ohio, Massachusetts,
and Quebec. From the beginning, I was
greatly surprised to discover how few
really distinct phrases the wood thrushes
used. Very many had no more than
three, the great majority used but four,
and only a few had as many as five or
six. The finest singers I heard were
usually those with only four phrases,
which they uttered with such beauty of
modulation, and such deliberate excel-
lence, as to suggest the thought expressed
by Thoreau : " He confines himself to
his few notes, in which he is unrivaled,
as if his kind had learned this and no
more anciently."
These phrases, whether in the eastern
or western parts of the wood thrush
range, were all very much alike. I have
not recorded over twenty different forms,
yet only once did I hear precisely the
same set used by two birds. In this case
they were near neighbors along the river
bank, father and son, perhaps, I thought.
All the other sets of phrases which I re-
corded were individual and unmistak-
able, often coinciding in two phrases or
three, only to differ sharply in one or
two others.
Here is a typical example of a thrush
song with four phrases. Of course it
does not pretend to give the actual sounds,
or to enable one unfamiliar with the bird
to reproduce the song, for the timbre, the
unique, individual wood thrush voice, is
not to be hinted at by such means. All
it does is to symbolize roughly the tones
of the musical scale, to which the thrush
approximated.
THE RAVINE WOOD THRUSH.
igr
mf
PP PP P ^.
^
' Jfti fc Sj 1 J 1 1 "*
K. • I "'
i II
f
•1 N _ «i N • ~
Is if
* * I 9 \
\.
J * Lri —
*
It will be seen that these four phrases
were assignable without undue stretch-
ing of the truth to the key of G natural.
Each began with two or three softly ut-
tered grace notes, continued with three or
more loud tones, and concluded with one
or more soft staccato notes, sometimes
tinkling or buzzing, and either much
higher or much lower than the loud ones
preceding. The sotto voce part of the
song was inaudible except at close range,
but on a few occasions I heard it devel-
oped into a whisper song decidedly unlike
the well-known flute notes.
Song -Forms of the Thrush.
779
It will also be observed that these four
phrases seemed to form part of a broken
melody. The first was introductory in
character, uttered with the bird's richest
tones, round and liquid, with an organ
tremolo or pulsation on the last note quite
unmatched for vibrant beauty by any
other bird of the region. The next
phrases seemed to continue the musical
progress, the second being a cadence
into the key of D, the third an arpeggio
leading back into G again ; and each of
these was sharper and more metallic in
quality than the first one, the third being
especially rapid and brilliant, equal in
dexterity to any of the brown thrasher's
roulades, and far finer in tone. The
last phrase, which was thin and reedy,
seemed to be a sort of conclusion to the
song.
With much the same words the songs
of all the other forty odd wood thrushes
I studied might be described; for whether
they consisted of three themes only, or
as many as six or seven, they always had
one or more phrases corresponding in
musical character to those shown above,
and the vocal quality was adjusted after
the same manner. The introductory
phrases were always rich, full, and round,
the continuing ones were less steady in
tone, more brilliant, but liable to contain
squeaky notes, and the final one was
generally soft and reedy. The thrushes
did not always hold so clearly to the key
as did the "ravine" wood thrush, for
now and then one would introduce acci-
dental notes, and occasionally one would
sing persistently off the pitch ; but the
tendency was to adhere to some one
key.
Here are some other examples, begin-
ning with a thrush who, during months
of observation, never used more than
three phrases. For convenience we will
call him
THE KIVERBANK WOOD THRUSH.
mf pp
PP
PP™
In this simplest of songs the same ele-
ments may be seen as in the one pre-
viously recorded : introductory, suspend-
ing, and final.
Here is another singer, with four
phrases, who signalized himself by intro-
ducing flats, thereby making a modula-
tion into the minor of his original key.
PP
THE POOL WOOD THRUSH.
3 PP
Following are the songs of two per- troduced a phrase in an entirely unrelat-
formers, each with five phrases, one of ed key, a daring performance for one of
whom, the " pasture " wood thrush, in- his kind.
780
Song -Forms of the Thrush.
THE KOADWAY WOOD THRUSH.
PPP
THE PASTURE WOOD THRUSH.
:/:.?• PP
^3E*-
But what of the order in which these
thrushes sang ? That problem proved
relatively simple, once the phrase-forms
had been identified, for the slowness and
precision of the thrushes made it easy
to record long series. I collected many
such, running into the hundreds for some
birds, taken at various times and under
all sorts of conditions ; and from a study
of these it appeared that the wood
thrushes, while singing with free choice,
tended to use their themes so as to pro-
duce as much variety as possible without
violating the musical character of the
phrases themselves. Further, each one
had a favorite order, or set of orders,
from which he would vary, but to which
he would return unfailingly. Here, for
instance, is the phrase sequence of a
thrush noticeable for his regularity.
THE SWAMP WOOD THRUSH.
J
PP ^
PPP
PPP
PPP
I •* -«••*• W» r • i -TJ -JT -« •*• •» ^ ^>k Ti \i •*- « V J .*
fa^Sf^Wf^^^a^^fir^rij^^
±5y n^zEEEEg^ -^=^F^p=^Mq
^ |? ^3 -|=^- ^
>-^TT r •) ^ ^ '— «i \j~\j \j~ \ i *i
g^ ^^_i^^^
This " swamp " thrush had no low in-
troductory phrase, and his whole song
was rather higher pitched than usual;
and this, together with his sharp ring-
ing utterance, made his song sequence a
striking one. Now and then he would
interject a phrase out of place, but he
would immediately return to his alterna-
tion, — 1,2,3 ; 1,2,4 ; 1,2,3 ; 1,2,4. The
other thrushes whose songs are shown
above were not quite so regular, but each
had his favorite sequence.
The "ravine "thrush sang 1,2,3; 1,2,4,
much like the " swamp " thrush. The
" pool " thrush used his four phrases a
little more freely, seeming to begin each
new series with the first phrase, but using
the others in varied combinations, as fol-
lows : 1,2,4,3 ; 1,4,2 ; 1,4,2 ; 1,2,3 ; 1,2,3 ;
1,2,3,4.
Song -Forms of the Thrush.
781
The " riverbank " thrush, with only
three phrases, used them after the follow-
ing manner : 1,2,3 ; 1,2,3 ; 1,3 ; 1,2,3 ;
1,2,3; 1,2,3; 1,3,2; 1,3,2; 1,3,2,3.
The " roadway " thrush used his five
phrases in varying orders, always seeming
to lead off with the low phrase, but using
his fifth or conclusion phrase very little,
as follows: 1,2,4,3,4 ; 1,2,4,3 ; 1,2,4,3,4;
1,2,3,4,3 ; 1,2 ; 1,4,2 ; 1,4,2,3,2 ; 1,2,3,4,5.
The " pasture " thrush used his five
phrases more equally, but seemed to
have certain favorite orders, as follows :
1,2,3,4 ; 1,5,2,3,4 ; 1,4 ; 1,2,3,4 ; 1,5,2,3,4.
Examples might be furnished of an in-
definite number of these song orders. A
thrush would often sing apparently at
random for a moment, but soon one of
the familiar sequences would reappear,
the one thing never done by thrushes in
full song being to repeat the same phrase
twice in succession.
It was contrast which lent its great
charm to the wood thrush song as com-
pared with the far more elaborate strains
of sparrows or bobolinks, — contrast of
tone and timbre as well as in the suc-
cession of phrases. Only the catbird
and brown thrasher offered anything
similar, and their delivery was so jerky
and their tone quality at best so inferior
that in emotional effect the simpler wood
thrush far surpassed.
Take the song of a fine singer, such
as the " lagoon " thrush, neighbor of the
" riverbank " and " pool " thrushes, but
distinctly superior. With deliberation he
uttered a sudden clear, round, vibratory
phrase, the little staccato notes following
" like the jingling of steel," as Thoreau
says.
8 PPP
and tinkling in timbre, apparently at the
other end of the gamut from its prede-
cessor.
PPP
Then followed a pause, not indicated in
the foregoing notations, but always to be
understood between any two wood thrush
phrases, and after it another phrase, thin
Another pause, and there was heard a
sudden modulation into the key of the
dominant, in a ringing, brilliant, rather
reedy voice.
After that came the low rich phrase, then
the second, and then, in place of the third
one, a new figure in a clear mellow flute
tone in the middle of the bird's register,
the little tinkling grace notes after it
seeming to shoot up like sparks.
PP+
Then would come the first again, then
the third, and so on, the four phrases
being employed so as to produce contin-
ual variety and contrast.
Is there any apparent reason for the
order relations which the birds seemed
to prefer ? Yes and no. The singers
did not hesitate to leave progressions un-
finished, and did not feel bound to abstain
from any particular successions, but still
they seemed to prefer to use their phrases
in a way comporting with their charac-
ter. They did not sing them at random,
nor did they use the conclusion phrase to
begin combinations ; but seemed, as the
above examples have shown, to prefer
such successions and variations as an or-
chestral composer would employ. It was
this apparent deliberate choice which
marked off the wood thrush from such
singers as the bobolinks, the orioles, the
sparrows, or finches, which repeated like
an involuntary expression of joy the same
782
Song -Forms of the Thrush.
melody the day through. The wood
thrush with his few figures used them,
and them only, not inventing recklessly,
but employing his well-learned themes
with apparent purpose.
When I turned from the wood thrush
to study the song of his smaller cousin,
the hermit thrush, I found a far harder
task confronting me. Hermit thrushes
sang with untiring persistence, some-
times for an hour or more at a stretch,
and at all times of the day, but they
were generally much shyer than the wood
thrushes, harder to approach, and more
restless, often changing from tree to tree
while in song. Then, too, they were
seldom at all gregarious, being found at
considerable distances one from another,
whereas wood thrushes seemed to prefer
to nest in little colonies ; so I had to
tramp through wide stretches of New
England and Canadian pastures and
forests, and row many miles along the
shores of Canadian lakes, in order to
learn to know even a few of these singers
very well. Only on very rare occasions
did I succeed in taking notes from a few
yards ; as a rule, my studies were neces-
sarily carried on at a respectful distance
from the invisible performers, as they
perched in the thick green of hemlocks or
spruces, or among the foliage of great
sugar maples.
Each thrush, it appeared, had from
eight to eleven separate phrases, and
these, unlike the figures of the wood
thrush, were in several different keys,
and were all approximately of the same
form. This typical hermit thrush theme
consisted of a long opening note, followed
by two or more groups of rapid notes
higher on the scale, as in the following
example : —
be similar to the foregoing, and each
would generally begin on a different note,
which, as it was deliberate, loud, and pen-
etrating, was not difficult to determine
with the pitch-pipe. The rapid figures,
however, were altogether too lively to
be analyzed in this way, and had to be
guessed at from their apparent intervals.
It was my impression, not ventured as
an unqualified statement, that the song-
forms adhered rather closely to the ma-
jor or minor scale ; at all events, after lis-
tening to scores of birds and taking volu-
minous notes upon two or three singers,
that was the way it appeared. Of course
the birds sang off the pitch with freedom,
just as did the wood thrushes ; but never-
theless, the impression produced was of
an approximation to the conventional
scale.
Assuming that such was the case, it
followed that each phrase was in a key
of its own, which was determined gen-
erally by the opening note ; and from a
mass of observations the fact soon ap-
peared that the opening notes of these
phrases formed part of a definite scale.
A certain bird, for instance, as in the
case to be noted below, had nine phrases,
and these were always in the following
keys : —
Each of the eight or more phrases would
Others were in sharps, but, however
arranged, these opening notes always
formed some scale. No doubt the ac-
tual sounds did not conform entirely ;
some were a shade too low, others too
high, but the pitch-pipe never failed to re-
cord a series surprisingly close to some
conventional scale. This meant that all
of the hermit thrush utterances were
related in a much more elaborate man-
ner than were any of the wood thrush
phrases. In some cases it followed that
the bird sang in just those keys marked
by the opening notes. Here is an ex-
ample of this sort : —
Song -Forms of the Thrush.
CAMP HERMIT THRUSH.
783
The contrast in form between this and
the wood thrush's song is obvious. In-
stead of from three to five unlike phrases
forming part of a broken melody, there
were nine phrases, all similar in form,
not melodic, but thematic in character,
That songs so unlike in form should be
confused seems scarcely comprehensible,
By no means all hermit thrushes ex-
hibited the regularity of the singer fig-
ured above. A neighbor of the " camp "
thrush, whose voice often rang out with
his in response or in rivalry, had a more
complicated system, fascinating in its va-
riety. Following out the system of no-
menclature which I have used for pur-
poses of identification, I will call him the
" sugar woods " thrush.
SUGAR WOODS THRUSH.
f ; -• B— | 9-*— t- >
~T v ^^ "^5"
f k 3 v vpp
784
Song -Forms of the Thrush.
Here there were ten phrases in six keys, phrases were so long as almost to merit
of which two were minor, and in four the name of melodies. A striking fea-
ture of them was their frequent syncopa-
tion, and the fact that in one case the
A still more elaborate variety was that long opening note was omitted, — an un-
of a Canadian thrush, some of whose usual occurrence.
LAKE THRUSH.
cases the opening note was not the key-
note.
Just what Burroughs meant when he
wrote years ago that the hermit thrush's
song was " interspersed with the finest
trills and the most delicate preludes," is
not clear to me. I have heard the birds
sing at such short range that their loud
notes fairly pierced, yet I have never de-
tected any soft notes like those of the
wood thrush, to which, indeed, the fore-
going description seems to apply. Pos-
sibly it may refer to the hermit's whisper
song, which consists of the bird's highest
phrases at the top of his register, — sung
sotto voce in a rather hurried manner,
with occasional hints at one of the lower
figures. But when the bird was in full
song, these high phrases played a limited
part only.
The order of the hermit thrush's song
I found much harder to determine than
that of the wood thrush, since there were
more phrases, all of which were similar
in form, and some of which differed by
only a half tone. The ear could not be
relied upon with certainty to distinguish
in all cases between a C natural or a
D flat phrase, and it was hard to adjust
a pitch-pipe rapidly enough. Still, by
unending patience, a good many records
were obtained, and these when studied
showed a similar result to that found in
the records of the wood thrush. The
hermit thrush, while bound to no order,
tended to use certain favorite sequences
and to avoid others. With the " camp "
thrush this was not very obvious, but in
the long run it appeared that the bird
adhered to successions like that in the
Song -Forms of the Thrush.
785
notation, liking to jump by fifths and
octaves, and seeming to avoid with great
care the utterance of successive phrases
at or near the same pitch.
The " sugar woods " thrush, however,
surpassed the " camp " thrush in the in-
terest of his song order, for he had certain
definitely marked preferences. After the
first phrase in B flat major he sang the
octave phrase more than half the time,
and the E flat phrase most of the re-
mainder ; after the phrase in D major,
he sang the phrase beginning with A, the
eighth in the notation, the phrase in
B flatmajor,the phrase inE minor begin-
ning on G, — the sixth in the notation, —
and no others. So each might be taken
in succession, and it would be found that
the bird had a certain favorite order,
with a limited range of variation. Now
and then he would sing his ten phrases
in succession, but far oftener his choice
of alternatives prevented such a conclu-
sion and led to repetitions. The notation
above represents, however, an actual se-
quence. The matter may be summed
up by saying that beneath an apparently
haphazard utterance, clear signs were
found of permanent preferences in each
bird. Like the wood thrush, the hermit
tried to produce continual variety, with-
out repetition of phrases near the same
pitch, and without violent contrasts. It
will be seen that most of the sequences
are in related keys ; and when the bird
varies from flats to sharps the change is
made easy by the form. See, for instance,
how the " sugar woods " thrush, having
sung a minor phrase beginning with B
flat, — the fifth, — follows it with one be-
ginning with G natural, which is a rather
harsh sequence in itself, but rendered in-
conspicuous here by the fact that it is a
precise echo of the B flat phrase.
The contrasts of pitch were aided by
those of timbre. The lowest phrases were
generally round and hollow, not very
loud, but exquisitely finished in delivery,
uttered with deliberation and spirit, clear
and rich, after pauses even longer than
VOL. xcin. — NO. 560. 50
the wood thrush's. Here is an example
from a Massachusetts bird, the " pas-
ture " hermit thrush, neighbor of the
" pasture " wood thrush before described :
mf-
y.
After this first phrase would come a
pause, then, in a far more penetrating
voice, a middle phrase, brilliant and me-
tallic, but sometimes, it must be con-
fessed, reedy to the point of harshness.
Following that would come another low
phrase, round in the opening note, ring-
ing in the rapid figures.
Then, after the usual pause, would break
out a phrase an octave higher, in a thin,
metallic utterance, contrasting sharply
with the preceding one, and by its change
in timbre suggesting a jump of two oc-
taves rather than one.
PPP
Then down would come the bird again
to a middle phrase, this one clear and
penetrating, the opening note swelling
a little, the rapid triplets falling like
tongued flute notes.
After that a pause, and then a high
phrase in metallic tones.
P
And finally a high C, thin and tinkling,
786
Song -Forms of the Thrush.
a " spray " of notes, as Bradford Torrey
calls it somewhere.
P
And so it would go on, a half hour at
a stretch, continual contrast in pitch and
timbre, continual progression, continual
variation in the order, piquing the inter-
est with never-failing change, long after
a sparrow or a bobolink would have be-
come utterly familiar.
Why the hermit thrushes should use
sets of musical themes whose initial notes
fall into a scale, why they should employ
these themes so as to secure pleasing
contrast, or why they should prefer cer-
tain sequences to others, does not appear.
Whatever the true explanation may be,
the effect upon the listener is that of per-
sonality ; every one of the little olive and
russet singers seems to be exercising aes-
thetic judgment.
A few times during this search it was
my good fortune to hear these two
thrushes simultaneously, — twice on a
mountain side in Canada, and several
times in the brook valleys of the Berk-
shire hills in Massachusetts. On one
memorable occasion fine singers of the
two species, those called here the " pas-
ture " wood thrush and the " pasture "
hermit thrush, sang in full voice not over
fifty yards apart ; and while I drank in
the sounds, it seemed to me that the su-
perior beauty of the wood thrush's best
tones was undeniable. There was a liquid
fullness, and that pulsation like an organ
tremolo on the final note of the first two
phrases, which was not equaled by his ri-
val. The hermit's low phrases were clear
and ringing, but lacked the color of the
larger bird's. In the middle and upper
registers the two were more nearly on
an equality, and, in fact, could scarcely
be distinguished except for the form ;
but here, also, it seemed to me that the
wood thrush was rather sweeter and
more flowing. On the other hand, the
hermit's voice was more penetrating,
more vibrant with overtones ; its sweet-
ness was piercing instead of liquid, and
at any distance it rang with a silvery
chime ; while the wood thrush's short
phrases sounded, by comparison, muffled
and dull.
Although birds differ very much in
vocal quality, and some hermits are vastly
superior, not only in penetration but in
sweetness, to a great many wood thrushes,
yet on the whole the contrast of these
two birds seemed typical ; and were it
a question of vocal sweetness alone, the
hermit thrush would have to be ranked
below his larger cousin. But in song-
form, in execution, and in general effect,
the contrast was undeniably, it seemed
to me, in favor of the hermit thrush.
The wood thrush had a clear, liquid mod-
ulation, sudden and striking, and a bril-
liant arpeggio, but the hermit had a
more elaborate figure, greater delicacy
of utterance, and a manner of delivery
which no wood thrush equaled. His
long opening note in each phrase swelled
gradually, the first group of rapid notes
came louder, like a sparkling shower,
and the next one diminished, fading
away into a silvery whisper. When the
two sang together, the wood thrush's
phrases seemed beautiful, but fragmen-
tary, the hermit thrush's a finished per-
formance. He did not sing louder than
the wood thrush, but his voice and de-
livery marked him out amid the full
chorus of early summer, which at that
time made the fields and woods vocal.
Over the chirping of sparrows or war-
blers, the tinkle of wrens, the bubble and
sparkle of bobolinks, the flowing warble
of robins or grosbeaks, through the chim-
ing of veeries, even through the liquid
notes of the wood thrush, the steady,
swinging phrases of the hermit thrush
pierced their way, now high and clear,
now low and ringing, always individual,
strong, delicate, and aspiring. He was
the master artist of the Northern woods.
Theodore Clarke Smith.
The Stage Coach.
787
THE STAGE COACH.
AT the very threshold of life Julian
Grabo met with an Obstacle. It filled
the doorway. He could not pass nor
see beyond it.
" By Jove, what a nuisance ! " he had
cried when the doctor told him he had
not more than six months to live.
" But perhaps," said the physician, " if
you '11 go into the arid country, you '11
make the six months into a year."
" I could put in a year excellently,"
mused Grabo. " I believe I '11 go."
He could hardly realize that he was in
danger. He did not feel depleted nor
weakened. He was full of excitable life,
and interested in everything, — men, wo-
men, animals, poetry, history, and possi-
bilities.
" You could put me anywhere and I 'd
amuse myself," he said to a friend. " I
never yet complained about anything, —
not even my coffee. It seems such a
waste of good nature for ME to go off !"
His friends were incredulous, — the
men swore and the women wept. But
Grabo, who had once bellowed like a
calf when his football team had been
beaten by a rival college, now shed no
tear. He sent out his farewell cards,
packed up his portable possessions, and
set off post haste for a sheep ranch in
Colorado, which was kept by a young
Englishman he had met on his travels.
On the cars he tried to think things
over, but his mind would not concen-
trate. All he could think of was Steven-
son's epitaph, which the rails rattled off
at a brisk tempo : —
Under the wide and starry sky,
Dig the grave and let me lie.
Glad did I live and gladly die,
And I laid me down with a will.
This be the verse you grave for me :
Here he lies where he longed to be ;
Home is the sailor, home from the sea,
And the hunter home from the hill.
"But the real trouble with all that
is," he said to the rails, " that this hun-
ter has not yet been to the hill, nor this
sailor to the sea."
The rails kept up an idiot-iteration,
however : —
Glad did I live and gladly die.
Glad did I live and gladly die !
He grew more and more dejected as
he went westward. He resented the
vigor of the engineer who stuck his
grimy face out of the cab to nod to
Grabo as he paced the platform ; he was
angry with the brunette young woman
who was on her way to Los Angeles and
expected to find it gay ; he detested the
hale old man who told stories in the
smoking compartment. He grew bitter
at the inequalities of fate. By degrees
he reached despair, then abjection. He
sank into a sodden reverie, forgot to eat,
slept as if he were drugged, and awoke
with a semi-prostration upon him. This
made him exaggerate his symptoms.
" It will not be even three months,"
his frightened spirit shrieked out to his
trembling body.
At Upper Mesa he was to take a stage
coach, and he loathed the idea, for it
meant that he was to have companions.
And, truly enough, he found himself in
intimate proximity to them. He would
have liked to shut them out of his con-
sciousness, but so far from being able to
do that, he was forced into a minute yet
distasteful observation of them.
As a man doomed to die before sun-
down will watch the progress of a fly
on the wall, or count the tiles on the
floor of his cell, so Julian observed his
companions, though they were to him
as negligible as tiles or flies.
There were five passengers within the
coach and one outside with the driver.
To begin with, there was Grabo, the
doomed and unreconciled. Then there
788
The Stage Coach.
was an old man, a woman of forty, a
woman of seventy-five, and a child — a
girl — of seven. Outside were Tuttle
Underwood, a miner, and Henry Victor,
the owner and driver of the stage coach.
These two men had introduced them-
selves to Grabo. Victor measured six
feet three, and he handled the ribbons of
his four-in-hand with happy nonchalance.
The Rockies have a breed of their own,
and Victor was a Rocky Mountain man.
His hands, face, and beard were the color
of well-seasoned sandstone, and he affect-
ed the same color in his clothes. Never
did a human being fit more unobtrusive-
ly into a landscape. His voice had an
agreeable monotone which accorded with
the minor, undulating harmonies of wind,
water, and trees which soughed in the
canons. If some over-musician, reflect-
ed Grabo, could find the keynote to the
Rockies, that would be the keynote to
Henry Victor, too.
As for his four bays, they were moun-
tain horses as surely as their driver was
a mountain man, and no one of them
was rendered in the least nervous by the
fact that the rear wheels of the coach
were flirting over the precipice as the
vehicle flung around the buttressed rock.
Underwood, the miner, was as lean as
a coyote. His iron-gray hair was shaggy,
his eyes in perfect focus, his hand good
for the exigeant shot. He wore a dust-
colored hat, a blue flannel shirt, a faded
coat, trousers of the same sad fabric
tucked in handsome boots, and he was
belted and armed. He looked to Grabo
as if he would probably live forever.
As for the people within the coach,
each one was alone. None had known
any other member of the company till
that hour. Even the child was alone,
her only companion being an ugly doll.
"You are my little girl," she was
heard to babble. " Really and truly you
are, though I have n't seen you since
ever. You 've been living away off with
your grandmother for years 'n' years,
and now you 're coming home to your
own mamma. You 'd better look nice,
or she won't like you, so there ! "
She found a bit of string in the bottom
of the coach and tied it around the doll's
neck.
" There ! " she said in satisfied accents,
" now you 've got a tag on, telling just
who you are and where you 're going,
and there would n't be any sense in your
getting lost. You just go up to anybody,
man or woman, and show 'em that tag,
and they '11 help you on. Folks is always
good to a child."
This optimistic remark was followed
by a sigh on the part of the child, and
seemed to be more of a creed than a
conviction. It created a mild sensation.
The old man looked appealingly at the
women. The old woman felt in her bag
for treasures which she did not find.
The woman of forty started up from a
reverie, regarded the child in a puzzled
and somewhat embarrassed fashion, and
then seated herself by her.
" I hope you 're not getting tired," she
said. There was a minor cadence to the
voice, which was rather deep and serious.
" I don't think I 'm tired," said the
child, turning eyes of heavenly blue upon
the woman, " but it 's dreadful when no
one says a word ! "
" Oh, well, you see," said the woman
apologetically, letting a smile creep into
her rather bitter face, " we don't know
each other."
" Except you and me," cried the child,
with a laugh which revealed two rows of
minute and pearly teeth. " We got ac-
quainted quick, did n't we ? "
"Very," said the woman with flatter-
ing gravity.
" I Ve come a long way," continued
the little one, " and my grandma cried
when I left her. Here, read this ! "
She tugged at a string which ran about
her neck, and drew out a tag. The
woman read from it : —
" Margaret Samsom, Arline, Colo-
rado."
" That 's my name and where I 'm go-
The Stage Coach.
789
ing," announced the- child. " And my
mamma's name is just the same as mine.
She '11 be waiting for me when I get out
of the coach."
Her penetrating treble reached the
men on the front seat, and Underwood
nudged Victor.
" D' yeh hear that ? " he whispered.
" She 's th' daughter of Red Mag ! "
They turned in their seats and re-
garded the child with curiosity and some-
thing akin to horror. She had a face
as tender as a flower. Her blue eyes
were beaming with excitement, brown
ringlets clustered about her low, blue-
veined temples, her teeth were like little
grains of rice, and her parted lips were
exquisitely arched. As her soft glowing
neck crept away between the clean ruf-
fles of her gingham frock, it conveyed
an idea of delicacy and loveliness of per-
son. She beamed at the miner as he
regarded her with frowning anxiety.
" Peter 's eye ! " he said, and spat
twice in the road. At intervals he ejacu-
lated with disgust, " Red Mag ! " And
once he said, " The only decent thing
for you to do, Hank, is to run this here
stage over the gulch, and end it for her
before she meets her ' mamma.' "
" Have you a tag around your neck ? "
little Margaret asked of the bitter-faced
woman.
« No, dear."
" What am I going to call you when
I want to speak to you ? "
" Mrs. Ellery — no, aunt Anna."
The horses were toiling up the slope.
They were in the midst of a great gorge.
The world about them was vast and
dead, — its fires burned out, its floods
spent, its tumult stilled. As they climbed
up and up, the very old woman began to
move her head from side to side curi-
ously, and several times she put her
hand to her throat.
"There 's a dreadful noise in my ears,"
she complained.
" Never bin up as high as this before,
I reckon ? " said Victor interrogatively.
" Who — me ? " piped the old woman.
"No ; I 've always lived at Morgansport.
That ain't a hilly place."
" Going to live out this-a-way ? "
" Well, yes, I bethought myself to,"
responded the old lady in a neighborly
tone. " My sister Marthy, that I 've bin
livin' with, is twenty years younger than
me, and a very spry person. I got under
foot. I could see it. She did n't like
me f ussin' about her kitchen, nur weedin'
in the garden, and it seemed to her that
I had to burn a most uncommon amount
of wood to keep warm. I kin see as
plain as anything how it struck Marthy.
I did n't want her grudgin' me my days,
and I took matters in my own hands,
and lit right out for my son James's. I
knew Jim would want me ! " She put
her head on one side, exhibiting that
last form of coquetry — that of a mother
for a well-loved son.
" Does your son live at Ar line, ma'am ?"
inquired Victor.
"Yes," she answered, smiling till her
toothless gums were fully revealed.
" James Farnam. Maybe you know
him ? He was always great for makin'
friends."
Grabo saw the men on the front seat
exchange one swift and frightened look.
" Now I will drive the blamed old
stage over the rim ! " swore Victor to
Underwood. They smiled at each other
grimly.
" What 's to pay ? " wondered Grabo.
The day wore on pleasantly enough.
Grabo forgot himself a little. Or, rather,
the mysticism which was his inheritance
from a line of dreamers began to anaes-
thetize him. The vastness of the world
about him, the endurability of those
mountain ranges, the clarity of the sap-
phire heavens, the swing of the high sun,
the obvious fret and fume of man's little
life as indicated in the group there in the
coach, all reconciled him somewhat to
his grief. The old, old woman swayed
feebly in her seat, yet still smiled on,
thinking of " Jim." The little child grew
790
The Stage Coach.
fretful, and the bitter-faced woman com-
forted her with infinite tenderness. The
two men on the front seat were telling
tales to each other to pass away the time.
Only the old man and Grabo sat silent.
There seemed to be something hunted in
the old man's face.
" What 's his trouble ? " wondered
Grabo, " and how long before oblivion
will overtake him ? The trouble with me
is, I have no trouble. I 'm in fit shape
for life, and not attaining it." He remem-
bered with sudden self-pity that he had
not even kissed a woman as men kiss the
women they love. This made him turn
the eye of masculine appraisement on the
bitter-faced person near him. He no-
ticed that her eyes were gray, half-closed,
as if from instinctive reserve of soul;
that her lips were softly compressed, that
they were shapely and mournful. Her
complexion was that of a woman who has
lost anticipation, and in whose veins the
blood moves wearily. A plume of gray
hair showed above her brow in the midst
of the brown. She was costumed with
conspicuous neatness in black, and about
her neck gear was just a touch of bright-
ness, as if, after long denial, she had
awakened to the joys of decoration.
" She 's beginning over," mused Grabo.
" She has seen a mirage on the desert,
and she 's making for it."
Silence seemed to lie on Grabo like a
spell. The fundamental silence of the
abyss, of the vault, of the everlasting
hills, had come up and seized him by
the throat. It became a pain at last, —
for Grabo had always been loquacious
till he met the Obstacle. He made up
his mind to speak, and he turned to the
old man.
" You are going west for the first time,
sir ? " He spoke out of a dry throat,
and the trifling inquiry represented a
triumph of will.
" Me ? " said the old man pleasantly,
with a kind of timid neighborliness.
" Yes — the first time. I 've lived in
Ohio all my life."
" Quite a break-up — coming away
out here," said Grabo.
" Yes, yes. Well, I 've been living
with my son's wife. My son died three
years ago, and Lucy set out to do her
duty by me. It was hard for her — and
harder for me ! " he gave a sardonic little
twist to his lips, which were loose and
pitiful and discouraged-looking. " A
while ago I could see she was taking in-
terest in a man down street, — a good
man, too. I sold some things I had.
' Lucy,' says I, ' I 'm going to take my-
self off.' — ' How '11 you live, father ? '
says she. — ' There 's my pension,' says
I, ' and there 's old Luke Bailey. He
was in my regiment, you see, and he
baches it out in Red Butte. He 's often
written urging me to come out.' — ' But
father,' says Lucy, ' I always wanted to
be with you in your last hours.' She
was still thinking of her duty. That 's
Lucy's style. — ' Lucy,' says I, ' spare
yourself the pleasure. You 're a good
girl, and that 's why I 'm getting out of
your way.' "
His faded eyes watered, and he sat
staring at the wall of rock beside which
the coach was running.
" There ain't nothing so satisfying as
being out from under foot," observed
Underwood, who had been listening.
" It ain't just what I pictured for my-
self," said the old man. " I 've had good
homes, and a good wife and children,
and responsibility in my community.
They 're all gone. Sometimes I think I
never had them, — that it was a kind o'
dream. Anyhow, now I 'm going on to
a new place. It took sixty-five years for
my roots to strike in, and then I tore
'em up."
" What's your name, sir? " asked Grabo
respectfully. His heart warmed genially
toward this man who had built up the
structure of life and seen it tumble about
his feet.
"John Siller," responded the man,
with a ring in his voice, as if the name
had its significance. Grabo was sure it
The Stage Coach.
791
was a name which had counted here and
there, — perhaps at town meetings, per-
haps at local elections, maybe in abolition
gatherings, certainly on the roster of a
volunteer regiment.
"You've walked a long road," said
Grabo gently.
"Eh? Oh yes! Walked a long road !
Well, you 'd think so if you 'd walked it
with me. The people that have passed —
they 'd make a cityf ul ! But walking a
long road ain't the only thing, young
man."
He looked at Grabo with a penetrating
glance.
" He sees I 'm doomed," thought the
young man.
"Walking a road, and not being driven
along it, is the thing," said Anna Ellery.
There was an accent of wrath and sor-
row in her voice. " My idea is to walk
it and set my own pace."
It had the gusto of a fresh declaration
of independence.
"Evidently," thought Grabo, "she
found the path too narrow for two."
It came lunch time, and being in a
grove of pines, they all seated themselves
on the ground and ate together. Mrs.
Ellery made coffee ; Grabo looked after
the child, who was fastidious, and did not
take well to the cold food. Mrs. Farnam,
the old woman, could not eat at all, and
the coffee she drank intoxicated her.
" If it wa'n't for the thought of Jim,"
she gasped again and again, " I don't
know how I could git up spirit to go on."
" There ain't nothing to do, ma'am, but
git on," said Victor cheerily. " You '11
come out all right, ma'am."
But as the afternoon wore on she
became more and more distressed. Mrs.
Ellery noted how the breath fluttered
in the poor old throat. Grabo, who
watched her with fascinated eyes, and
who — so strange was his mood — ap-
peared to feel the winds of Destiny
blowing continually upon this party of
stragglers in search of happiness, saw a
peculiar pallor spreading over her face.
He was not surprised when the poor
little figure toppled forward. He caught
it in his arms, and called to Victor to
rein in. The brakes clamped the wheels,
and Grabo got out with the old woman
in his arms. She was no heavier than
a child, but repulsive with the repulsion
of wasted flesh, sunken eyes, and inert
limbs. Her cheeks began to puff out
curiously, and her eyes to roll. The
coach was, fortunately, at a small level
semicircle of honest horizontal earth.
The soil had washed down here, and
pinon trees — seven in number — stood
together in a confidential and frightened
group. Grabo put the old soul there.
Nay — the soul, which may have been
young or old, had escaped, but whether
it was in the purple and solemn valley
beneath them, or in the sweet clarity of
daffodil sky above, no man ventured to
surmise. All looked at the pitiful body,
which, bereft of that which gave it its
trifling significance, lay supine.
There being neither prayers nor tears
at hand, the bitter-faced woman, who
had been supporting the dead woman,
kissed her on the forehead.
" Good-by, mother," she said gently.
Grabo felt the tears leap to his eyes.
" I did n't know women were so
sweet," he thought.
" You heard her say she was goin' to
Arline to visit her darlin' son, did n't
yeh ? " asked Underwood with emotion.
Grabo nodded.
" Well," said Underwood, " she would
n't hev seen him. He tried to knife Bill
Upton in Garey's place three weeks back,
and got shot between the eyes."
" Dead ? " asked Anna Ellery.
" You bet, ma'am," said Underwood
devoutly.
" Poor mother ! " said Anna Ellery
once more.
The panting beasts stood at rest. The
old man, Siller, was hanging on to the
child, lest she should go too near the
precipice. A rigor began to creep over
the dead woman.
792
The Stage Coach.
" Shall we take her to Arline ? " asked
Victor.
Grabo turned sick at the idea. The
old man shivered. Anna Ellery shook
her head.
" It 's no good," she said. " Whom
would we take her to ? This is a beau-
tiful place for a — for a grave."
"And handy to heaven," muttered
Underwood.
" How about gettin' through to our
journey's end ? " asked John Siller.
" We '11 have to camp here to-night,"
Victor said. " The Rattlesnake River,
three miles from here, has been doing its
best lately. I wouldn't take anybody
through it in the dark that I was any-
ways responsible for — not to mention
the hosses." He looked affectionately at
his beasts.
"It would be too bad to risk the
horses," smiled Grabo. He was think-
ing the others might take the Long Voy-
age merrily enough. Yet who could tell !
There is a saying that the young are
prodigal with life, but the old economi-
cal of it. Perhaps old man Siller wanted
to live !
" You think, then," said Victor, " that
we 'd best plant the old soul right here ? "
He spoke almost tenderly.
" Not till the child 's asleep," whis-
pered Anna Ellery.
Victor took command, sending Under-
wood to chop wood, and Grabo to get
the victuals from the coach, while he
himself looked after the horses.
Anna led the child back among the
rocks.
" See," she said, " you can have a
little playhouse here." She made a
miniature pantry for her with pebbles
and bits of mica for the dishes. Then
she returned to the " poor mother."
She combed her straggling locks, made
her decent, covered her face with a clean
handkerchief and the whole body with a
horse blanket. By this time the men
had a fire, and a repast with hot coffee.
A good deal of time had been consumed,
and already the shadows were groping
their way far down the gorge, — troop-
ing down like blind men bound on some
grim and final errand. In the inlet of
land — for the blue ether of space ran
about them like a fluid sea — the day
began to gloom. Anna called the child
to her, and they all sat about the fire
and ate. It grew chilly, and she wrapped
the child in her cape. When the little one
began to fret Anna held her close till
she fell asleep, and then carried her over
to the shelter of the rocks, and wrapped
her well. When she came back the
men had already begun to dig the grave
with whatever implements they had at
hand. There was one shovel, an axe,
and three knives in the party. They
were all utilized for the task, and in a
little while the shallow grave was dug.
Victor and Grabo laid the old woman in
her comfortable bed. They covered
her over without the " dust to dust."
No one prayed. No one sang. But
Mrs. Ellery had found the dead woman's
full name on a letter within her pocket,
and Grabo graved the name on the rock.
MARY FARNAM. DATE AND PLACE OF BIRTH
UNKNOWN.
DIED ON THE ROAD, AND BURIED BY HER FEL-
LOW TRAVELERS.
He put the date last. They all watched
him, and stirred the fire from time to
time to give him light. After it was
over, Anna went to look at the child.
She was sleeping delicately, and when
Anna stooped close to her she noticed
that her breath was like that of a young
calf. She came back to the fire and
seated herself among the men. Her eyes
were shining, her mouth tender, all her
aspect sisterly.
" Pretty fine little gal, ma'am," said
Underwood, pointing over his shoulder
with his thumb.
" Oh ! " said Anna, unable to articu-
late her appreciation of the child.
" You want to know the kindest thing
you kin do to her ? " persisted Under-
wood. Anna's silent gesture answered.
The Stage Coach.
793
" Well, throw her over this here gorge
while she sleeps. She '11 never know
nothin' after that."
" What do you mean ? "
" You ain't acquainted in Arline,
ma'am, but if you wus, you 'd know
Red Mag. Every man there knows 'er.
Every woman runs from 'er. She lives
in a filthy hut, and talks filthier than
she looks. That 's the young un's ma."
" But I won't have it ! " Mrs. Ellery
cried, clasping her hands. " I won't
have her go to a woman like that ! "
She appeared to be shaken by some
strange passion. Grabo listened to the
wind wailing through the gorge, but he
smiled to himself, and said that of course
it was the windage of Destiny's wings.
For surely this night Her presence was
felt. He turned gleaming eyes upon
Anna. " Maternity has come to her,"
he reflected, " without birth pangs." He
was convinced that she would never let
the child go to its mother.
" I like an intelligent breaker of the
law," he mused. He threw himself back
on the ground, his hands under his head.
He was happy. He liked his compan-
ions. They seemed to him more alive
than any persons he had previously met.
" The stars are more neighborly than
I had supposed," he said, conscious that
his calm remark was out of key with
Anna's emotion, but willing to take the
attention from her.
" They do look that way out here,"
admitted Underwood. " I suppose it 's
because they 're the only neighbors you
kin get."
" I like the way they mind their own
business," observed Victor. " You 'd
think, to look at 'em, that they was thicker
than snakes at Slaney's Pocket, but they
never git mixed up."
Grabo was cheerfully misquoting some
lines of Tennyson's. Underwood caught
the last couplet : —
— " yet -with power to burn and brand
His nothingness into man."
He debated the point.
" I don't know about nothingness ! " he
said. " When I see the way men come
it over these hulking, ugly brutes of
mountains, and git their livings out of
'em, and pick and peck at 'em, and tun-
nel and bridge 'em, I don't know about
nothingness. I ain't the man to take a
back seat fur a star or a mountain."
The stars seemed to grow in brilliancy.
The blackness deepened. It was im-
penetrable, chill, yet with streams of
warmth flowing through it like currents
of charity through a censorious world.
The precipice yawned a few feet distant.
The little company rested at ease on a
narrow shelf midway between earth and
heaven. They were bound together by
the torrent, which impeded their jour-
ney, by the night which encompassed yet
could not extinguish them, by the new-
made grave of their fellow traveler, by
the sleeping child, and by the fire.
"It's odd," said old John Siller,
lighting his pipe, " but I don't know
when I 've felt so at home."
Julian Grabo let his hand fall so that,
in the darkness, it touched Anna Ellery 's
dress. He held the fabric between his
fingers, as he used to hold his mother's
gown when he was a child.
They all talked together softly, often
with a friendly incoherence. Anna had
a sense of being watched over. The
men smiled at her brother-wise. Final-
ly Grabo urged her to sleep, and she
went once more to see to the covering of
the child ; then she stood for a space by
Mary Farnam's grave. Grabo joined
her.
" She is well covered," he said.
" I 've been saying a prayer," con-
fessed Anna, " and I 'd almost forgot-
ten how."
" Were you praying for the living or
the dead ? " asked Grabo.
" I hardly know," smiled Anna. " To-
night I could easily imagine that we are
all dead."
Their eyes met. A shiver of sympa-
thy shook them, and then, with decision,
794
The Stage Coach.
they withdrew their gaze. It is the fash-
ion — world old — for souls thus to sa-
lute each other. These, having saluted,
bade each other farewell. Anna lay
down beside the child and slept a little
while. It was dawn when she awoke, and
shafts of marvelous purple light were
streaming into the uttermost recess of
the gorge. Some far mountains were
bathed in rose. The world was glorious
as a Transfiguration. Anna rose up as
one who comes into a new life. The child
awoke, too, and laughed at her, dewy-
fresh. They kissed, and while the men
were getting ready the horses Anna
bathed the little one's face and hands,
and combed her curls. Then she made
herself tidy, and had time, before all was
in readiness, to cover the grave of the
" fellow traveler " with pinon boughs.
Grabo helped her and Margaret into
the coach. Siller sat with Grabo. Under-
wood and Victor mounted in front. The
horses had had their breakfast, though
the people had not, and they started on
their way with careful speed. The ford
was reached, and they plunged among
foaming waters and hidden rocks. Lit-
tle Margaret threw her arms about Mrs.
Ellery's neck with a cry of alarm. Old
Siller grasped Grabo's arm.
" I believe we 're going down," Siller
whimpered.
" I think not," soothed Julian. " Our
friends the horses would be ashamed to
let us, you know."
Once more the eyes of Anna and Ju-
lian met. They were wondering the same
thing, — whether it would be a better
matter if the torrent should overcome
them.
"Life is too sardonic for that," re-
flected Grabo. " That innocent baby
will live to grow up under the tutelage of
her mother, Red Mag ; Mrs. Ellery, in
her search for liberty, will find some new
form of slavery ; old Siller will not per-
ish till senility has disintegrated him ;
as for me, I shall exist to watch death
creeping on me like a tide ; as for the
fellows on the front seat, they would n't
ruin their reputations by dying in so in-
nocent a manner ! "
They emerged upon a fine mesa, and
sped on swiftly to the place of relay of
horses and breakfast. At the meal they
felt the hour of parting hanging over
them heavily.
" I git tired, sometimes," said Under-
wood in an outburst, " of livin' up a
gulch. Strikin' a pile ain't the only thing
in life. It 's about time I took a little
comfort, seems to me, and got a family
about me." His eyes rested on Margaret,
who had gone into semi-eclipse behind a
bowl of milk. Her soft curls, her pink
chin, and her dimpled hands only were
visible.
" Yes," said old Siller, who was mum-
bling his food after the fashion of the
toothless, " family life 's the thing. If
only my son " — He did not finish, but
fixed a wistful gaze on Grabo.
Julian was, indeed, a good sight to look
upon this morning. He held his head
high, his eyes were clear and blue, his
complexion like a girl's, his figure ele-
gant, his garments a perfect fit. He
looked as carefully attired as if he had
come newly from his chamber. There
was something poignant in the glance
Anna turned upon him.
" If such a man had been my lover" —
she thought brokenly, and then sank into
heavy reminiscence.
" Well," said Victor aloud, " I some-
times think I 'd like to settle down, too.
I git tired of drivin' people around."
He regarded Anna with frank admi-
ration. Underwood followed his gaze,
and for the first time a personal specu-
lation took possession of him. Both of
them estimated the woman's excellent
physique, her kind yet sad eyes, the ef-
ficiency of her manner, the modest yet
striking fashion of her dress.
When the time came to resume their
journey with fresh horses, they had about
them that stalwart interest which follows
the eating of a good meal. The very
The Stage Coach.
795
pangs of parting diverted them. Siller,
particularly, was alert.
" I wonder what old Luke Bailey will
think when he sees me loomin' up," he
mused, chuckling with anticipatory glee.
" I mean to keep my settin'-room always
spic up for company," he announced.
It was intended for a general invita-
tion.
" So shall I," said Anna in her minor,
vibratory voice. " I shall make friends
of my own choosing. I shall go to church
with good people. I mean to be useful.
I am going to have some new dresses.
After a little while I 'm going to inrite
people to supper." She looked demure,
and evidently saw the pitifulness of her
spoken aspirations. " You see," she
said by way of explanation, " it 's years
since — he — let me hold up my head."
The words were almost whispered, but
every one heard them. A sympathetic
silence fell. No one asked a question,
but all four men wondered as to the legal
status of her liberty. Margaret was
playing with some little tassels on Anna's
jacket. She looked up in Anna's face
with sudden winsomeness.
" I like you," she said, and hung her
head. Anna snatched her close.
" I like you ! " she declared fiercely.
Victor turned in his seat.
" In a little while we '11 be at Arline."
The words were significant, — even om-
inous.
Anna Ellery must have heard them,
but she gave no sign. She fixed her
eyes upon the landscape, and a pecul-
iar smile fastened itself upon her face.
Margaret began to yawn, showing those
ricelike teeth, and Anna lifted her up
into her lap, and absently soothed her till
she fell asleep. The curious smile never
left her face.
A few straggling cabins came into
view, and then the raw streets of a min-
ing town.
" We 're here," announced Underwood
gloomily.
There was a gathering in front of the
general store, — ranchers, loafers, Mexi-
cans, Chinese, Indians, Negroes. The
coach stopped, and Victor threw off the
mail bag and handed out packages.
Down the street came a large woman,
her arm locked in that of a male com-
panion. Both were staggering and vo-
ciferous. Grabo guessed the truth in-
stantly. This was Red Mag, — this was
Margaret's mother ! He tried once more
to think philosophically of the wings of
Destiny, but he was in hot revolt. His
hands clenched involuntarily. Old Sil-
ler was trembling, and his jaw worked
up and down.
" Mag 's celebratin'," Grabo heard one
of the crowd remark.
" Expectin' her daughter," said a sar-
donic voice.
Anna patted the sleeping child, and
stared straight ahead.
A silence spread through the crowd as
Mag came staggering on. Grabo looked
at the bloated face, the dare-devil eyes,
the frowzy red hair, the slovenly gown,
and then at the woman who treasured
the child in her arms.
" I 'm going to see an event," he re-
flected.
Red Mag seemed to have forgotten
temporarily what she had come for.
Then, with an oath, she remembered.
She stuck her head in the coach.
" That 's my gal ! " she declared.
Underwood and Victor kept their eyes
on Anna, as men in an orchestra fasten
their gaze upon the conductor. Grabo
noticed that each sat with a hand clapped
to his pistol pocket.
" I 'm lookin' fur my gal," Mag said
defiantly. Her companion came forward
pugnaciously.
u Where 's that there young un that
took passage with you, Hank Victor ? "
he demanded.
" There 's no child here but my daugh-
ter," said Anna Ellery in her penetrating
voice.
It was the lift of the baton, and the
orchestra responded.
796
The Stage Coach.
" Git out of the way, there ! " com-
manded Victor. He raised his whip.
Mag began to pour forth oaths fluently.
But the whip fell. The horses leaped
from the watering trough, their check
reins hanging.
A mile out of town, Grabo leaned
forward, lifted one of Anna Ellery's
hands where it still clasped the sleeping
child, and put it to his lips. Old Siller
was weeping. Underwood and Victor
sat close together on the front seat and
seemed to be enjoying themselves.
In an hour they reached Grabo's
place. It was the cross-roads on a high
and sunny plain, where the pungent
smell of sage-brush perfumed the air.
Grabo looked about him, in the spirit of
reconnaissance. He had a sense that he
was to be left in space. But he liked it.
There was an open wagon and a pair
of mules waiting for him, and they were
driven by an alert boy with freckles.
" I came down yisterday," he said to
Grabo, " expectin' you. When you
did n't come, I camped. Mr. Memory
is awful anxious to see ye, sir. He 's laid
up with a twisted knee. Got throwed
off his bronc."
" You see I 'm wanted," Grabo smiled
at SiUer. « And I think you '11 be ! "
He shook hands with all the men, and
they slapped him on the shoulder. He
and Anna looked once more in each
other's eyes. For a second or two they
were motionless. Then he removed a
curious little pin from the inside of his
coat, regarded its cabalistic insignia af-
fectionately, and pinned it on her dress.
" It 's a decoration for distinguished
conduct," he said with such nonchalance
as he had at command.
He kissed Margaret on her moist
forehead.
" She '11 grow up a good woman,"
he prophesied. " She '11 be a comfort
to you. In a day or two I shall send
her a gift. Once in three months it will
be repeated. Perhaps you '11 write me
how she gets on."
He was, indeed, laying plans for the
child even as he talked. The freckled
boy transferred Julian's belongings to
the wagon.
" Sometimes when you drive by I '11
be here at the cross-roads to yell at you,"
Grabo told Victor.
He got in the wagon, and both vehicles
started on their ways.
For a few moments Grabo sat tense,
throbbing with curious emotions.
Then twelve shots rent the air, —
the parting salute of his fellow travelers.
He stood up in the wagon and waved
his adieux. He could see Anna waving,
and little Margaret, whom the shooting
had awakened, and he recognized Siller's
bandana. When he sat down the freckled
boy said, —
" You '11 git jest as hearty a hullo
when ye reach Amber Ranch."
" Shall I ? " cried Grabo. " And who
are you, friend ? "
" Me ? Biff Hathaway. I 'm herdin'
f'r Mr. Memory. I come out here to
die. The doctor giv me a month."
" How long ago was that ? " asked
Grabo.
" Four year," grinned the freckled
boy.
Grabo straightened his shoulders. He
took in the flowing spacious plain, the
perfect arch of the cloudless vault, the
windings of the persistent road.
" Does n't it seem to you we 're taking
it a little too easy ? " he asked.
The freckle-faced boy snapped his
whip, and the tawny mules leaped for-
ward. Julian sat straining his eyes into
the distance. Miraculously, the common
dust of the highway had been transmu-
ted into gold.
Elia W. Peattie.
Letters of John JRuskin.
797
LETTERS OF JOHN RUSKIN.
II.
1857-1859.
IN the preface to the fifth and last vol-
ume of Modern Painters Ruskin gives
a brief statement of " matters which had
employed or interrupted " him between
1855 and 1860. The great variety of
these matters shows the extent of his
intellectual interests, ranging from the
Elements of Drawing to theories of Po-
litical Economy.
Through the autumn and winter of
1857-58 he was occupied in caring for
and arranging the immense mass of the
Turner drawings in the National Gallery.
In May, 1858, exhausted by the hard la-
bor, the exciting interest, and the heavy
responsibility of this work, he went to
Switzerland to rest, and to make studies
in several of the old towns in order to
illustrate some of Turner's compositions.
In August he went on into Italy and
stopped at Turin. Almost twenty years
afterwards he wrote of his experience
there : "I was still in the bonds of my
old Evangelical faith, and, in 1858, it
was with me Protestantism or nothing :
the crisis of the whole turn of my
thoughts being one Sunday morning, at
Turin, when, from before Paul Vero-
nese's Queen of Sheba, and under a quite
overwhelmed sense of his God - given
power, I went away to a Waldensian
chapel, where a little squeaking idiot
was preaching to an audience of seven-
teen old women and three louts, that
1 Fors Clavigera, letter Ixxvi, March, 1877.
Ruskin gives a somewhat different account of
this critical incident in the first chapter of the
third volume of Prceterita, 1888.
2 I venture to call the reader's attention to
the fact that much in these letters is written
in a humorous vein, the humor often, indeed,
they were the only children of God in
Turin ; and that all the people in Turin
outside the chapel, and all the people in
the world out of sight of Monte Viso,
would be damned. I came out of the
chapel, in sum of twenty years of
thought, a conclusively un - converted
man. . . . Thus then it went with me
till 1874, when I had lived sixteen full
years with ' the religion of Humanity '
for rough and strong and sure founda-
tion of everything." 1
Ruskin returned to England to spend
the winter of 1859 at home, very hard at
work, which was by no means concen-
trated on Modern Painters. In the spring
he went to Berlin, to Dresden, and to
Munich, in order to study the Venetian
pictures in the galleries of those cities.
After his return home, he set himself to
his task steadily, and with his accustomed
industry, and in the spring of 1860, seven-
teen years after the publication of the
first volume, the fifth and last volume of
Modern Painters was completed and pub-
lished. The following letters illustrate
this period, which proved as time went
on. to have been practically the turning-
point of his life.2
PENRITH, CUMBERLAND,
24th September, '57.
DEAR NORTON, — I was very thank-
ful to know you had arrived safely,
and without getting any blue put on
your wings by that Atlantic, and I am
trying to conceive you as very happy in
the neighborhood of those rattlesnakes,
being1 grim enough. I should not thus call in
question the reader's intelligence, were it not
that some humorous passages in the first in-
stallment of the letters have been taken as
quite serious expressions of opinion by one or
more of their critics.
Copyright, 1904, by CHARLES ELIOT NORTON.
798
Letters of John Ruskin.
bears, etc., though it seems to me much
the sort of happiness (compared with
ours at home here) that a poor little
chimney-sweeper is enjoying helow on
the doorstep, to whom I have just im-
parted what consolation there is in six-
pence for the untowardness of his fate,
his mother having declared that if " he
didna get a job, he would stop oot all
day." You have plenty " jobs," of
course, in your fine new country ; but
you seem to me, nevertheless, " stop-
ping out all day." I envy your power
of enjoyment, however, and respect it,
and, so far, understand it ; for truly it
must be a grand thing to be in a country
that one has good hope of, and which is
always improving, instead of, as I am, in
the position of the wicked man in one
of the old paraphrases my mother used
to teach me : —
Fixed on his house he leans ; — his house
And all its props decay,
He holds it fast ; but, while he holds,
The tottering frame gives way.
And yet, I should n't say that, neither,
for in all I am doing, or trying to do, I
assume the infancy of my country, and
look forward to a state of things which
everybody mocks at, as ridiculous and
unpopular, and which holds the same re-
lation to our present condition that the
said condition does to aboriginal Briton-
ship. Still, one may look triumphantly
to the advance of one's country from its
long clothes to its jacket, and yet grudge
the loss of the pretty lace on the baby
caps. Not, by the way, that baby caps
ever should have any lace (vide, passim,
my political economy). Truly, however,
it does look like a sunset in the east, to-
day ; and my baby may die of croup be-
fore it gets its jacket ; but I know what
kind of omen it is for your American
art, — whatever else may flourish among
the rattlesnakes, that the first studies of
nature which I get sent me here by way
of present are of Dead leaves, — studies
of hectic red and "flying gold of the
ruined woodlands," by a young lady. I
have accepted them gratefully, but send
her back word that she had better draw
" buds " henceforward.
I am just returning through Manches-
ter to London to set to work on the Tur-
ner sketches, which are going finally to
be entrusted to me, altogether ; and a
pretty piece of work I shall have of them ;
pretty, I hope to make it at last, in the
most literal sense.
We have had a wonderfully fine sum-
mer, and the harvest of oats in Scotland
is quite as pretty as any vintage, prettier,
I think, for a vintage is a great mess,
and I always think it such a pity the
grapes should be squeezed. Much more
when it comes to dancing among the
grapes with bare feet, — and other such
arcana of Bacchanalian craft. Besides
there is, so far as I know, no instrument
employed on vines, either for pruning or
cutting, half so graceful or metaphori-
cal as the sickle. I don't know what
they used in Palestine for the clusters
of the " Vine of the earth," but as far
as I remember vintages, it is hand work.
I have never seen a maize or rice harvest
(have you?), and, for the present, think
there is nothing like oats ; — why I should
continue to write it in that pedantic man-
ner I know not; the Scotch word being
" aits " and the English " whuts " — the
h very mute, and the u full. It has been
such fine weather, too, that all our little
rivers are dried up. You never told me
enough about what Americans feel when
first they see one of our " celebrated "
rivers ; Yarrow, or Tweed, or Teviot, or
such like ; consisting, in all probability,
of as much water as usually is obtained
by a mischievous boy from the parish
pump, circling round a small stone with
a water wagtail on it.
I have not often been more surprised
than I was by hearing of Mrs. Stowe at
Durham. She had an introduction to
the librarian, of course, and there are
very notable manuscripts at Durham as
you probably know ; and the librarian is
very proud of them, and was much an-
Letters of John Ruskln.
799
noyed when Mrs. Stowe preferred " go-
ing in a boat on the river." This pre-
ference would have seemed, even to
me, a great manuscript hunter, quite jus-
tifiable in a novelist ; but it puzzled me
to account for Mrs. Stowe's conceding
the title of " River " to the water at
Durham, or conceiving the idea of its
floating a boat, seeing that it must, in
relation to an American river, bear much
the aspect of a not very large town
drain.
I shall write you again when I get some
notion of my work for winter ; I hope in
time for the letter to get over the water
by the 16th November ; I have put it
down 16th in my diary ; and yet in my
memory it always seemed to me you said
the 17th. I can't make out why. I am
very glad that you found all well. Pre-
sent my sincerest regards to Mrs. Nor-
ton and your sisters. My father and
mother unite in kind and grateful re-
membrances to yourself.
Ever affectionately yours,
J. RUSKIN.
DENMARK HILL, 5th December, 1857.
DEAR NORTON, — I am now begin-
ning to be seriously anxious lest you
should not have got either of my letters
— and if not, what you are thinking
of me by this time I cannot guess —
kindly and merciful as I know your judg-
ment always is. I sent you one letter
from Manchester, not a long one, but
still a " letter ; " then a " salutation "
rather than letter, posted as I thought
very cleverly, so as to get over the water
just in time for your birthday, about ten
days afterwards. Just about then — No,
it must have been later, perhaps five
days after the 16th, I got your letter of
the 30th October ; but I supposed at all
events my birthday letter would have
reached you and explained matters. My
1 I was spending the winter in Newport.
2 The first number of the Atlantic Monthly,
— that for November.
8 Ruskin gave a full and interesting account
letters were directed Cambridge, near
Boston. I knew nothing of Rhode Island
or Newport,1 nor do I know more now,
but this line must take its chance.
I was delighted with the magazine 2
and all that was in it — but I won't write
more just now, for I feel doubtful even
of your Rhode Island address and in
despair lest I should never catch you with
a letter in that fearful American Wilder-
ness, from which you will shoot barbed
arrows at me, or poisoned ones of si-
lence.
Ever affectionately yours,
J. RUSKIN.
I see you are to stay at Rhode Island
some months, so I may risk a little bit
more chat — not that I can chat at pre-
sent, for my head and hands are full to
choking and perpetual slipping through
thoughts and fingers. I 've got all the
Turner sketches in the National Gallery
to arrange, — 19,000 : of these some
15,000 I had never seen before, and
though most of them quite slight and to
other people unintelligible, to me they
are all intelligible and weary me by the
quantity of their telling — hundreds of
new questions beyond what they tell be-
ing suggested every hour. Besides this
I have to plan frames — measure —
mount — catalogue — all with single
head and double hands only : and under
the necessity of pleasing other people no
less than of satisfying myself — and I 've
enough to do.8 (I didn't know there
was anything graphic on this side of the
paper.4)
I 'm very grateful for your faith in me
through all this unhappy accident of si-
lence.
Ever affectionately yours,
J. RUSKIN.
What a glorious thing of Lowell's that
of the condition in which he found these draw-
ings, and of his work on them in the preface to
the fifth volume of Modern Painters.
* Two fragments of drawing.
800
Letters of John Ruslcin.
is * — but it 's too bad to quiz Pallas, I
can stand it about anybody but her.
[February 28, 1858.]
MY DEAR NORTON, — Your letter for
my birthday and the two little volumes
of Lowell reached me as nearly as pos-
sible together — the letter on the ninth
of February 3 — so truly had you calcu-
lated. I know you will have any pa-
tience with me, so here is the last day
of the month, and no thanks sent yet.
To show you a little what kind of state
my mind is in, I have facsimiled for you
as nearly as I could one of the 19,000
sketches. It, like most of them, is not
a sketch, but a group of sketches, made
on both sides of the leaf of the notebook.
The size of the leaf is indicated by the
red line, — on the opposite leaf of the
note-paper is the sketch on the other side
of the leaf in the original. The note-
books vary in contents from 60 to 90
leaves ; there are about two hundred
books of the kind (300 and odd, of
notebooks in all), and each leaf has
on an average this quantity of work, a
great many leaves being slighter, some
blank, but a great many also elaborate
in the highest degree, some containing
ten exquisite compositions on each side
of the leaf — thus — each no bigger than
this 8 — and with about that quantity of
work in each — but every touch of it in-
estimable, done with his whole soul in it.
Generally the slighter sketches are writ-
ten over everywhere, as in the example
enclosed, every incident being noted that
was going on at the moment of the sketch.
The legends on one side, you will see,
" Old wall, Mill, Wall, Koad, Linen dry-
ing." Another subject, scrawled through
the big one afterwards, inscribed, " Lauen-
stein [?]." The words under " Children
playing at a well " I can't read. The
little thing in the sky of the one below
is the machicolation of the tower.
1 The Origin of Didactic Poetry, in the At-
lantic.
2 Raskin's birthday was February 8.
Fancy all this coming upon me in an
avalanche — all in the most fearful dis-
order — and you will understand that I
really can hardly understand anything
else, or think about anything else.
Thank you, however, at least for all
that I can't think about. Certainly I
can't write anything just now for the
magazine. Thank you for your notice
of my mistake about freno in Dante —
I have no doubt of your being quite
right. . . .
I 've been reading Froissart lately,
and certainly, if we ever advance as
much from our own times as we have
advanced from those of Edward III, we
shall have a very pretty free country of
it Chivalry, in Froissart, really seems
to consist chiefly in burning of towns and
murdering women and children.
Well — no more at present — from —
as our English clowns say at the ends of
their letters. I assure you this is a longer
letter than I 've written to anybody this
four months. Sincerest regards to your
mother and sisters.
Ever affectionately yours,
J. RUSKIN.
FROM JOHN JAMES RUSKIN.
LONDON, 31 May, 1858.
MY DEAR SIR, — Being authorized
to open Letters addressed to my Son
Mr. J. Ruskin during his absence (a
privilege not always accorded to Fa-
thers), I have had the pleasure of perus-
ing your Letter of 17 May, and a part
of it requiring immediate reply will ac-
count for my intruding my Correspon-
dence upon you.
I beg of you to detain the Drawing
of the Block of Gneiss, being quite cer-
tain my son would so wish. He will
tell you himself when he wants it —
your Letter will go to him to-morrow, at
Lucerne.
He has spent seven months, nearly,
8 Ruskin here draws an oblong figure about
two inches by one.
Letters of John Ruskin.
801
in reducing to something of Order a
Chaos of 19,000 Drawings and Sketches
by Turner, now National property —
getting mounted or framed a few hun-
dred of such Drawings as he considered
might be useful or interesting to young
Artists or the public. These are at
Marlborough House, and he is gone to
make his own Sketches of any Buildings
about the Rhine or Switzerland or north
of Italy in danger of falling or of being
restored. His seven-month work, though
a work of Love, was still work, and
though sorry to have him away I was
glad to get him away to fields and pas-
tures new. It may be the end of Octo-
ber before he returns D. V. to London.
I conclude you have seen his Notes on
Exhibitions or I would send one. The
public seem to take more interest in the
Pictures as Artists take more pains —
It is long since I have bought a Picture
(my Son going sufficiently deep into the
Luxury), but I was tempted by 3 Small
ones at the first glance, — Plassan's
Music Lesson, French Exhn. ; Lewis's
Inmate of the Harem, Rl. Academy ;
Lewis's Lilies & Roses, Constantino-
ple, Rl. Ac'y. I did not tell my Son I
had bought the first till bis Notes were
printed — not that it could bias him,
but it might have cramped his Cri-
tique. When his Notes were out I told
him the picture was his, and I was glad
he had spoken, say written, so well of
it.1 As the Times calls the Inmate of
the Harem a Masterpiece of Master-
pieces, and the Spectator stiles it a mar-
velous Gem, it is a pretty safe pur-
chase. I had it at home before the pub-
lic saw it.
I forward to my Son your Photograph
of the Giorgione, and I cut out and send
Stillman's Lecture, as the present Post
Master of France, Nap'n 3rd, is not to
be trusted with a newspaper. You are
1 Ruskin had written of this picture as fol-
lows : ' ' Exquisite in touch of pencil, and in
appreciation of delicate character, both in fea-
tures and gesture. . . . On the whole it seems
VOL. xcni. — NO. 560. 51
fortunate in possessing a picture of Gains-
borough — neither spot nor blot of him
ever appear for sale here.
If I have used a fi'eedom in my mode
of addressing you at the commencement
of this Letter, you have yourself occa-
sioned it. In the too few visits you
made to us here you almost endeared
yourself to Mrs. Ruskin and me as you
had already done to my Son. We beg
to offer our united Regards and best
wishes for your Health.
I am, my dear Sir,
Yours very truly,
JOHN JAMES RUSKIN.
CHAS. E. NORTON, Esqr.
Will you present our Kind Remem-
brances to your Mother and Sisters. I
send a copy of Notes to make sure.
DENMARK HILL, 24th October, '58.
DEAR NORTON, — At last I begin to
write letters again. I have been tired,
ill, almost, and much out of heart during
the summer ; not fit to write to you, per-
haps chiefly owing to the reaction from
the intense excitement of the Turner
work ; partly because at 39 one begins
to feel a life of sensation rather too much
for one. I believe I want either to take
up mathematics for a couple of years, or
to go into my father's counting house and
sell sherry for the same time — for other-
wise, there seems to me a chance of my
getting into perfect Dryasdust. I actu-
ally found the top of St. Gothard " dull "
this year. Besides this feeling of weari-
ness, I have more tiresome interruption
than I can bear ; questions — begging
for opinions on pictures, etc. — all which
I must put a stop to, but don't yet see my
way clearly to the desired result : — the
upshot of the matter being that I am get-
ting every day more cold and sulky —
and dislike writing letters even to my
to me the hest piece of quiet painting in the
room " [of the French Exhibition in London].
These words must have pleased his father as &
confirmation of his own judgment.
802
Letters of John Ruskin.
best friends ; I merely send this because
I want to know how you are.
I went away to Switzerland this year
the moment Academy was over ; and ex-
amined with a view to history Habsburg,
Zug, Morgarten, Grutli, Altorf, Btlrglen,
and Bellinzona — sketching a little ; but
generally disgusted by finding all tradi-
tions about buildings and places untrace-
able to any good foundation ; the field
of Morgarten excepted, which is clear
enough. Tell's birthplace, Bilrglen, is
very beautiful. But somehow, I tired
of the hills for the first time in my life,
and went away — where do you think ?
— to Turin, where I studied Paul Vero-
nese in the morning and went to the opera
at night for six weeks. And I Ve found
out a good deal, — more than I can put
in a letter, — in that six weeks, the main
thing in the way of discovery being that
painting — to be a first-rate painter —
you must n't be pious ; but a little wicked,
and entirely a man of the world. I had
been inclining to this opinion for some
years ; but I clinched it at Turin.
Then from Turin I came nearly
straight home, walking over the Cenis,
and paying a forenoon visit to my friends
at Chamouni, walking over the Forclaz
to them from St. Gervais and back by
the road — and I think I enjoyed that
day as if it had been a concentrated
month : — but yet — the mountains are
not what they were to me. A curious
mathematical question keeps whispering
itself to me every now and then, Why
is ground at an angle of 40, anything
better than ground at an angle of 30 —
or of 20 — or of 10 — or of nothing at
all ? It is but ground, after all.
Apropos of St. Gervais and St. Mar-
tin's— you may keep that block of gneiss
altogether if you like it ; I wish the trees
had been either in the sky, or out of it.
Please a line to say how you are.
Kindest regards to your Mother and Sis-
1 Writing of this picture in the preface to
the fifth volume of Modern Painters (1860)
Ruskin says : " With much consternation but
ters. My Father and mother are well
and beg kindest regards to you.
I have written your initials and mine
in the two volumes of Lowell (how de-
lightful the new prefaces to the Fable).
He does me more good in my dull fits
than anybody, and makes me hopeful
again. What a beautiful face he has.
Ever affectionately yours,
J. RUSKIN.
29th November [1858].
DEAR NORTON, — I 'm so intensely
obliged to you for your letter and conso-
lations about Paolo Veronese and Titian
and Turner and Correggio and Tinto-
retto. Paolo and Titian are much
deeper however than you know yet,
immensely deeper than I had the least
idea of till this last summer. Paolo 's
as full of mischief as an egg 's full of
meat — always up to some dodge or
other — just like Tintoretto. In his Solo-
mon receiving Queen of Sheba, one of
the golden lions of the Throne is put
into full light, and a falconer underneath
holds a white falcon, as white as snow,
just under the lion, so as to carry Solo-
mon on the lion and eagle, — and one
of the elders has got a jewel in his hand
with which he is pointing to Solomon,
of the form of a Cross ; the Queen 's
fainting — but her Dog is n't, — a little
King Charles Spaniel, about seven inches
high, — thinks it shocking his mistress
should faint, stands in front of her on
all his four legs apart, snarling at Solo-
mon with all his might — Solomon all
but drops his sceptre stooping forward
eagerly to get the Queen helped up —
such a beautiful fellow, all crisped gold-
en short hair over his head and the fine
Arabian arched brow — and I believe af-
ter all you '11 find the subtlest and grand-
est expression going is hidden under the
gold and purple of those vagabonds of
Venetians.1
more delight I found that I had never got to
the roots of the moral power of the Venetians,
and that they needed still another and a very
Letters of John Kuskin.
803
Yes, I should have been the better
of you — a good deal. I can get on
splendidly by myself if I can work or
walk all day long — but I could n't work,
and got low because I could n't.
I can't write more to-day — but I
thought you 'd like this better than
nothing.
I 'in better now, a little, but doubt-
ful and puzzled about many things.
Lowell does me more good than any-
body, what between encouraging me and
making me laugh. Mr. Knott 1 makes
me laugh more than anything I know
in the world — the punning is so rapid
and rich, there 's nothing near it but
Hood, and Hood is so awful under his
fun that one never can laugh.
Questi poveri — what are we to do
with them ? You don't mean to ask me
that seriously ? Make pets of them to
be sure — they were sent to be our dolls,
like the little girls' wax ones — only we
can't pet them until we get good flog-
gings for some people, as well.
Always yours affectionately,
J. RUSKIN.
DENMARK HILL, 28th December, 1858.
DEAR NORTON, — I am sadly afraid
you have not got my answer to your kind
letter written on your birthday. The
answer was short — but instant — and
you must rightly have thought me un-
feeling when you received none — it is
doubly kind of you to send me this poem
of Lowell's and your good wishes.
Indeed, I rather want good wishes
just now, for I am tormented by what I
cannot get said, nor done. I want to
get all the Titians, Tintorets, Paul
Vei-oneses, Turners, and Sir Joshuas
in the world — into one great fireproof
Gothic gallery of marble and serpentine.
I want to get them all perfectly engraved.
I want to go and draw all the subjects
of Turner's 19,000 sketches in Switzer-
stern course of study." In the third chapter
of Part ix in this volume is a vivid description
of the picture.
land and Italy, elaborated by myself. I
want to get everybody a dinner who
has n't got one. I want to macadamize
some new roads to Heaven with broken
fools'-heads ; I want to hang up some
knaves out of the way, not that I 've
any dislike to them, but I think it would
be wholesome for them, and for other
people, and that they would make good
crow's meat. I want to play all day
long and arrange my cabinet of minerals
with new white wool ; I want somebody
to amuse me when I 'm tired ; I want
Turner's pictures not to fade ; I want
to be able to draw clouds, and to under-
stand how they go — and I can't make
them stand still, nor understand them —
they all go sideways, •n-A.aytai (what a
fellow that Aristophanes was ! and yet
to be always in the wrong in the main,
except in his love for ,/Eschylus and the
country. Did ever a worthy man do so
much mischief on the face of the Earth ? )
Farther, I want to make the Italians in-
dustrious, the Americans quiet, the Swiss
romantic, the Roman Catholics ration-
al, and the English Parliament honest
— and I can't do anything and don't
understand what I was born for. I get
melancholy — overeat myself, oversleep
myself — get pains in the back — don't
know what to do in anywise. What with
that infernal invention of steam, and gun-
powder, I think the fools may be a puff
or barrel or two too many for us. Never-
theless, the gunpowder has been doing
some work in China and India.
Meantime, thank you for Lowell. It
is very beautiful, but not, I think, up to
his work. Don't let him turn out any
but perfect work (except in fun). I don't
quite understand this — where is " God-
minster " ? How many hostile forms of
prayer are in the bells of the place that
woke him — or where was it ? " Oint-
ment from her eyes " is fine, read in the
temper it was written in ; but the first
1 Lowell's rollicking poem, The Unhappy
Lot of Mr. Knott.
804
Letters of John Ruskin.
touch of it on the ear is disagreeable —
too much of " Eyesalye " in the notion.
I 've ordered all I 've been writing
lately to be sent to you in a parcel.
Thank you always for what you send
me.
Our sincerest regards to you all.
Ever affectionately yours,
J. RUSKIN.
P. S. I want also to give lectures in all
the manufacturing towns, and to write an
essay on poetry, and to teach some mas-
ters of schools to draw ; and I want to be
perfectly quiet and undisturbed and not
to think, and to draw, myself, all day
long, till I can draw better ; and I want
to make a dear High Church fi-iend of
mine sit under Mr. Spurgeon.
SCHAFFHAUSEN, 31st July, '59.
MY DEAR NORTON, — I have been too
unwell or sick at heart lately to write to
my friends — but I don't think there 's
another of them who has been so good as
you, and believed still in my affection
for them. As I grow older, the evil
about us takes more definite and over-
whelming form in my eyes, and I have
no one near me to help me or soothe me,
so that I am obliged often to give up
thinking and take to walking and draw-
ing in a desperate way, as mechanical
opiates, but I can't write letters. My
hand is very shaky to-day (as I was up
at three to watch the dawn on the spray
of the fall, and it is hot now and I am
tired), — but I must write you a word or
two. The dastardly conduct of England
in this Italian war has affected me quite
unspeakably — even to entire despair —
so that I do not care to write any more
or do anything more that does not bear
directly on poor people's bellies — to fill
starved people's bellies is the only thing
a man can do in this generation, I begin
to perceive.
It has not been my fault that the Ros-
setti portrait was not done. I told him,
whenever he was ready, I could come.
But when I go now, I will see to it my-
self and have it done. I broke my pro-
mise to you about sending books — there
was always one lost or to be got or some-
thing — and it was put off and off. Well,
I hope if they 'd been anybody else's
books, or if I really had thought that my
books would do you any good, I 'd not
have put it off. But you feel all I want
people to feel, and know as much as any-
body need know about art, and you don't
want my books. Nevertheless, when the
last volume of M. P. comes out, I '11 have
'em all bound and sent to you. I am at
work upon it, in a careless, listless way
— but it won't be the worse for the
different tempers it will be written in.
There will be little or no bombast in it,
I hope, and some deeper truths than I
knew — even a year ago.
The Italian campaign, with its broken
faith, has, as I said, put the top to all
my ill humor, but the bottom of it de-
pends on my own business. I see so
clearly the entire impossibility of any
salvation for art among the modern
European public. Nearly every old
building in Europe, France and Ger-
many is now destroyed by restoration,
and the pictures are fast following. The
Correggios of Dresden are mere wrecks ;
the modern Germans (chiefly at Mu-
nich) are in, without exception, the most
vile development of human arrogance
and ignorance I have ever seen or read
of. I have no words to speak about
them in. The English are making pro-
gress — which in about fifty years might
possibly lead to something — but as yet
they know nothing and can know no-
thing, and long before they gain any
sense Europe is likely to be as bare of
art as America. You have hope in be-
ginning again. I don't see any way to
it clearly.
I want to be as sure as I can of a let-
ter reaching you just now. I shall send
this with my London packet to-day, and
the next sheet with the next packet next
week, so as to have two chances. My
Letters of John Ruskin.
805
health is well enough. I draw a great
deal, thinking I may do more good by
copying and engraving things that are
passing away.
Sincere regards to your Mother and
Sisters. Ever, dear Norton,
Affectionately and gratefully yours,
J. RUSKIN.
THUK, 15th August [1859].
DEAR NORTON, — Scrap No. 2 is
long in coming — if it had n't been for
the steamers here, which keep putting
me in mind, morning and evening, of
the steamer on lake of Geneva,1 I don't
know when it would have corne. It 'a
very odd I don't keep writing to you
continually, for you are almost the only
friend I have left. I mean the only
friend who understands or feels with
me. I 've a good many radical half
friends, but I 'm not a radical and they
quarrel with me — by the way, so do
you a little — about my governing
schemes. Then all my Tory friends
think me worse than Robespierre.
Rossetti and the P R B 2 are all gone
crazy about the Morte d' Arthur. I
don't believe in Evangelicalism — and
my Evangelical (once) friends now look
upon me with as much horror as on one
of the possessed Gennesaret pigs. Nor
do I believe in the Pope — and some
Roman Catholic friends, who had great
hopes of me, think I ought to be burned.
Domestically, I am supposed worse than
Blue Beard ; Artistically, I am consid-
ered a mere packet of quibs and crack-
ers. I rather count upon Lowell as a
friend, though 1 've never seen him.
He and the Brownings and you. Four
— well — it 's a good deal to have — of
such, and I won't grumble — but then
you 're in America, and no good to me
— except that I 'm in a perfect state of
1 On which we had met in July, 1856.
2 The Pre - Raphaelite Brethren. Morris,
Burne - Jones, and others had been painting
scenes from the Morte d'Arthur on the walls of
the Oxford Union, and Morris had been writing
gnawing remorse about not writing to
you, and the Brownings are in Italy,
and I 'm as alone as a stone on a high
glacier, dropped the wrong way — in-
stead of among the moi-aine. Some
day, ^when I 've quite made up my mind
what to fight for, or whom to fight, I
shall do well enough, if I live, but I
have n't made up my mind what to fight
for — whether, for instance, people ought
to live in Swiss cottages and sit on three-
legged or one - legged stools ; whether
people ought to dress well or ill ; whether
ladies ought to tie their hair in beautiful
knots ; whether Commerce or Business
of any kind be an invention of the Devil
or not ; whether Art is a Crime or only
an Absurdity ; whether Clergymen ought
to be multiplied, or exterminated by ar-
senic, like rats ; whether in general we
are getting on, and if so where we are
going to ; whether it is worth while to
ascertain any of these things ; whether
one's tongue was ever made to talk
with or only to taste with. (Send to Mr.
Knott's house and get me some raps if
you can.)
Meantime, I 'm copying Titian as well
as I can, that being the only work I see
my way to at all clearly, and if I can ever
succeed in painting a bit of flesh, or a coil
of hair, I '11 begin thinking " what next."
I '11 send you another scrap soon. I 'm
a little happier to-day than I 've been for
some time at the steady look and set of
Tuscany and Modena. It looks like grey
of dawn, don't it ? Sincerest regards to
your Mother and Sisters.
Ever affectionately yours,
J. RUSKIN.
DENMARK HILL, 10th December, 1859.
MY DEAR NORTON, — The first thing
I did when I got home was to go to Ros-
setti to see about the portrait. I found
tales imbued with its spirit in the short-lived
Oxford and 'Cambridge Magazine. The single
volume of this magazine contains much writing
by Morris and Burne-Jones full of the poetic
imagination of their fervent youth.
806
A Quatrain.
him deep in work — but, which was
worse, I found your commission was not
for a little drawing like Browning's, but
for a grand finished, delicate oil — which
R. spoke quite coolly of taking three or
four weeks about, wanting I don't know
how many sittings. I had to go into the
country for a fortnight, and have been ill
since I came back with cold and such
like, and I don't like the looks of myself
— however, I 'm going to see R. about it
again immediately ; * but I 'm now wor-
ried about another matter. The draw-
ing he has done for you is, I think, almost
the worst thing he has ever done, and will
not only bitterly disappoint you, but put
an end to all chance of R's reputation
ever beginning in America. Under
which circumstances, the only thing to
be done, it seems to me, is to send you
the said drawing indeed, but with it I
will send one he did for me, which at all
events has some of his power in it. I am
not sure what it will be, for I don't quite
like some bits in the largest I have, and
in the best I have the color is changing
— he having by an unlucky accident used
red lead for vermilion. So I shall try and
change the largest with him for a more
perfect small one, and send whatever it
is for a New Year's token. I shall put
a little pencil sketch of R's in with it —
the Virgin Mary in the house of St. John
— not much — yet a Thing — such as
none but R. could do.
I have your kind letter with Lowell's
— both quite aboundingly helpful to me.
Please take charge of enclosed answer to
Lowell.
I am finishing 5th vol.,2 and find it is
only to be done at all by working at it to
the exclusion of everything else. But
— that way — I heartily trust in getting
it done in spring and having my hands
and soul so far free.
I had heard nothing of that terrible
slave affair,8 till your letter came. I can
understand the effect it may have — but
here in Europe many and many a mar-
tyrdom must come before we shall over-
throw our slavery.
I hope to write you another line with
drawings — meantime love and all good
wishes for your Christmas time, and with
sincerest regards to your Mother and
Sisters,
Ever affectionately yours,
J. RUSKIN.
Charles Eliot Norton.
1 The commission was never executed.
2 Of Modern Painters.
(To be continued.)
8 John Brown's raid.
A QUATRAIN.
A FLAWLESS cup : how delicate and fine
The flowing curve of every jeweled line !
Look, turn it up or down, 't is perfect still, —
But holds no drop of life's heart-warming wine.
Henry van Dyke.
The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley. 807
THE DIPLOMATIC CONTEST FOR THE MISSISSIPPI VALLEY.
II.
AFTER Jay's treaty with England,
in November, 1794, the whole diplomatic
situation in respect to the Mississippi
Valley changed. It is necessary to ob-
serve how the United States sacrificed
the friendship of France in gaining that
of England ; how Spain, irate at the
conduct of her English ally, made the
peace of BSle with France, thus restor-
ing a concert between these two powers
for the first time since the rupture of
the Family Compact ; and how France,
seeking for means to injure England and
to render the United States more sub-
servient to French policy, turned her at-
tention again to the acquisition of Louis-
iana.
The representative of France in the
United States at that time was Fauchet.
As the successor of Genet, he was char-
acterized by Alexander Hamilton as
" a meteor following a comet ; " but
he appreciated the profound significance
of the new relations of this country with
England, and as soon as he was fairly
well informed of the purport of Jay's
treaty, in February, 1795, he proposed a
radical programme for meeting the situ-
ation. He reminded his government
that at the commencement of his mis-
sion the pressing need of France, then
threatened with famine, was American
provisions, and that political interests
were subordinated to the single consid-
eration of keeping this country from al-
liance with other powers while it served
as the granary for France and her is-
lands. He had energetically protested
against our failure to enforce the rights
of neutral commerce vigorously against
England ; but now Jay's treaty threat-
ened even more unfavorable conditions
by its concessions to Great Britain in
the matter of neutral rights, and the
alliance of 1778 was worse than use-
less. Yet, as he pointed out, France
had no means of intimidating the United
States. The ocean separated the two
powers, and the French West Indies, far
from threatening the United States, were
actually in danger of starvation in time
of war if American trade were cut off.
He quoted Jefferson's remark : " France
enjoys their sovereignty and we their
profit." A war to compel the Union to
follow French policy would deprive the
Republic of the indispensable trade of
America. Some other means must be
found, and the solution of the problem,
in Fauchet's opinion, was the acquisi-
tion of a continental colony in America :
" Louisiana opens her arms to us." This
province would furnish France the best
entrepot in North America for her com-
merce, raw material, and a market for
her manufactures, a monopoly of the
products of the American states on the
Mississippi, and a means of pressure upon
the United States. He predicted that,
unless a revolution occurred in Spanish
policy, the force of events would unite
Louisiana to the United States, and in
the course of time would bring about a
new confederation between this province
and the Western states, which would
not remain within the United States
fifty years. In this new union the supe-
rior institutions and power of the Amer-
ican element would give to it the sover-
eignty. But if France or any power
less feeble than Spain possessed Louisi-
ana, it would establish there the sover-
eignty over all the countries on the
Mississippi. If a nation with adequate
resources, said he, understood how to
manage the control of the river, it could
hold in dependence the Western states
of America, and might at pleasure ad-
vance or retard the rate of their growth.
What, then, he asks, might not France
808 The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley.
do with so many warm friends among
the Western settlers ? The leaven of
insurrection had been recently mani-
fested in the whiskey rebellion ; it would
depend upon France to decide the ques-
tion of dismemberment. In this way,
by pressure on our borders, she could
bend the United States to her will, or
in the possession of the Mississippi Val-
ley find a means of freeing herself and
her islands from their economic depen-
dence upon the United States. Such was
the line of thought presented by Fauchet
to the French authorities ; he preferred
diplomatic negotiation to war or the fili-
bustering system of Genet.
The possibility of a secession of the
people beyond the Alleghanies from the
Union was no new conception : settlers
had threatened it ; Federalists had calcu-
lated the value and the feasibility of the
union between the interior and the coast,
and after the acquisition of Louisiana
the leaders of New England threatened
secession ; travelers like Brissot had fore-
told the withdrawal of the West ; Wash-
ington had feared it; Western leaders
like Wilkinson, Sevier, and Robertson
had been ready to bring it about ; and
Spain and England, as we have seen, had
initiated negotiations to this end. There
can be little doubt that if the United States
had proved unwilling or unable to secure
free navigation for the West, it would
have withdrawn, and by reason of the lack
of sea power to defend its commerce pass-
ing from the mouth of the Mississippi
through the Gulf, it must have sought
protection from a foreign state. Fauchet
cited a dispatch by De Moustier, the
French minister to this country at the
close of the Confederation, in which he
reached conclusions similar to his own.
But properly to appreciate how deeply
rooted was the desire of France for the
whole Mississippi Valley, it must be un-
derstood that she had made the recovery
1 Me'moire historique et politique sur la Lou-
isiane par M. de Vergennes (Paris, 1802) ;
found, as its editor states, among the minister's
of this province a cardinal point in her
connections with the United States dur-
ing our Revolutionary War. If we may
accept as authentic a memoir 1 attribut-
ed to him, Vergennes, who conducted
French foreign relations at that time,
apprehended that when the United States
obtained its independence it would prove
able to give the law to France and Spain
in America. In this memoir, written
prior to the alliance of 1778, he consid-
ered means for averting this outcome, and
advised the king to insist, in the treaty
which France expected to dictate to Eng-
land at the conclusion of the war, upon the
recovery of the territory beyond the Alle-
ghanies. He regarded much of this ter-
ritory as rightly a part of the old French
Louisiana, and did not accept the view of
the Americans that it was a part of their
chartered possessions. He even drafted
a treaty providing in detail for the ces-
sion of this western region by England
to France, and for such a division of
Canada as would prevent an English at-
tack upon Louisiana by way of the Great
Lakes. He further proposed to procure
the retrocession of Louisiana from Spain,
and to restore it to its old French lim-
its, with the Alleghanies as the eastern
boundary. He pointed out to the king
that if the United States passed from the
colonial condition and secured a place
among independent nations, having
fought to defend its hearth fires, it would
next desire to extend itself over Louisi-
ana, Florida, and Mexico in order to
master all the approaches to the sea.
France, on the other hand, by possess-
ing the Mississippi Valley, the Great
Lakes, and the entrance to the St. Law-
rence, and by allying herself with the
Indians of the interior, could restrain
the ambitions of the Americans. By
the treaty of 1778, however, France re-
nounced the possession of territories in
North America that had belonged to
papers after his death, with his coat of arms at
the head of the document.
The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley. 809
England, but Vergennes supported the
Spanish contention that our own rights
stopped with the Alleghanies, and he
tried to acquire Louisiana from Spain.
He could evade the renunciation of ter-
ritory by making the region between the
Alleghanies and the Mississippi Indian
country. Instructing his minister to the
United States that France did not intend
to raise this nation to a position where
she would be independent of French sup-
port, he made earnest efforts to dissuade
the Americans from insisting on the Mis-
sissippi as their boundary in the terms
of peace. Indeed, so successful was he,
that in the dark days of 1781 Congress
voted to rescind its ultimatum, and in-
structed its representatives to be guided
by the advice of France. Fortunately,
the commissioners broke their instruc-
tions. We know what this advice would
have been from a plan which Vergennes'
confidential secretary showed to Jay.
This provided that the land south of the
Ohio, between the Alleghanies and the
Mississippi, should be Indian country, di-
vided by the Cumberland River into two
spheres of influence, — the northern to
fall to the United States, and the south-
ern to Spain. Vergennes' effort to induce
Spain to cede Louisiana to France would
have succeeded, if the latter power could
have furnished the funds to reimburse
Spain for the expenses incurred in de-
fending and administering that province.
The apprehensions of the far-sighted
French statesman were now proving only
too well-founded. France had lost the
fruits of the war which she had waged
as our ally, England was once more in
favor, and Louisiana was in danger. It
was with energy, therefore, that France
recurred to the policy of recovering her
former province.
In May, 1795, the French government
instructed Barthe*lemy, her negotiator
with Spain at Bale, to demand cessions
as the price of peace. The Spanish por-
tion of San Domingo, the Basque pro-
vince of Guipuscoa, and Louisiana were
desired, but upon Louisiana he was or-
dered to insist ; " the rest would be easy."
In support of her demand, France argued
that it would be a great gain to Spain to
place a strong power between her Ameri-
can possessions and those of the United
States, particularly since England had
by Jay's treaty guaranteed to the United
States the freedom of navigation of the
Mississippi, and it was to be feared that
these new allies would seize Louisiana.
At this juncture Godoy, the Duke of
Alcudia, was in control of the foreign
policy of Spain. Alarmed by conditions
in Europe, and chagrined at England's
arrangements with the United States at a
moment when Spain trembled for the fate
of Louisiana, he made peace with France
at Bale (July, 1795) ; but he refused to
yield Louisiana, preferring to abandon
the Spanish portion of San Domingo.
This only rendered France the more de-
termined to secure the continental colony
needed to support her West Indian pos-
sessions ; and in the negotiations later
over the terms of alliance, she pressed
hard for the additional cession. It is this
situation which explains the treaty that
Godoy made with the United States not
long after.
He was most reluctant to give up
Louisiana, but France demanded it as a
condition of her alliance. Threatened
thus with isolation, and confronted by
the prospect of a war with England, he
was disposed to conciliate the United
States, lest she join England and take
Louisiana by force. When, therefore,
Pinckney's threat to leave for London
was made, Godoy quickly came to terms,
and in the treaty of San Lorenzo (Octo-
ber 27, 1795) conceded the navigation
of the Mississippi, and our boundary on
that river, and agreed to give up the
Spanish posts north of New Orleans
within the disputed territory. Thus re-
lieved of the danger of an American in-
vasion, Godoy was in a better position to
resist the efforts of France to force him
to cede Louisiana.
810 The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley.
In the spring of 1796, the Directors
sent General Perignon to Madrid to ar-
range terms of a formal alliance. He
was instructed to warn Spain that French
influence in America was nearing its end.
War with the United States promised
France no satisfactory results, and to
punish the Americans by restrictions on
their commerce would deprive France
of a resource which the European wars
rendered necessary to her. These, how-
ever, were merely temporary difficulties.
" Who," asked the Directors, " can an-
swer that England and the United States
together will not divide up the northern
part of the New World ? What prevents
them ? " The instructions went on to
give a forceful presentation of the rapid-
ity with which settlers were pouring into
Kentucky and Tennessee, and of the dan-
ger to Louisiana from filibustering ex-
peditions. Conceding the navigation of
the Mississippi, in the opinion of France,
only prepared the ruin and invasion of
Louisiana whenever the Federal gov-
ernment, in concert with Great Britain,
should " give the reins to those fierce
inhabitants of the West." The Eng-
lish-speaking people would then overrun
Mexico and all North America, and the
commerce of the islands of the Gulf would
be dependent upon this Anglo-American
power. Only France, in alliance with
Spain, argued the Directors, can oppose
a counterpoise by the use of her old in-
fluence among the Indians. " We alone
can trace with strong and respected hand
the bounds of the power of the United
States and the limits of their territory."
All that France demanded was Louis-
iana, a province that, so far from serving
the purpose of its original cession as a bar-
rier against England, was now a danger-
ous possession to Spain, ever ready to
join with her neighbors. It had remained
in a condition of infancy while the United
States had acquired irresistible strength
on its borders. This country was now
daily preparing the subjects of Spain for
insurrection by intrigues and by the spec-
tacle of its prosperity. " On the other
hand," continued the Directors, " if this
possession were once in our hands, it
would be beyond insult by Great Britain,
to whom we can oppose not only the
Western settlements of the United States,
who are as friendly to us as they could
possibly be, but also the inhabitants of
Louisiana, who have given clear evidence
. of their indestructible attachment to their
former mother country. It gives us the
means to balance the marked predilec-
tion of the Federal government for our
enemy, and to retain it in the line of duty
by the fear of dismemberment which we
can bring about." " We shall affright
England by the sudden development of
an actual power in the New World, and
shall be in a position to oppose a per-
fect harmony to her attacks and her in-
trigues." They therefore urged Spain
to act at once, in order that the political
and military campaigns might begin in
America that very year.
As we shall presently see, the appre-
hension that England contemplated an
attack upon Louisiana was well found-
ed. But Godoy resolutely refused to give
up Louisiana, and Perignon was obliged
to content himself with a treaty of alli-
ance without this important concession.
France thereupon recalled him, and sent
a successor with the particular purpose
of persuading Spain to yield Louisiana
by the offer to join her in the conquest
of Portugal ; but the Prince of Peace re-
mained immovable ; nor did he consent
even when, in 1797, after Napoleon's
victories in Italy had given the Papal
legations to France, she offered them to
the royal house of Spain as an equivalent
for Louisiana. Had religious scruples
not prevented, however, Spain would
probably have accepted this proposition.
While France negotiated with Spain,
she prepared the ground in America.
In the winter of 1795, Colonel Fulton,
one of George Rogers Clark's officers in
the Genet expedition, was sent to con-
ciliate the Southwestern Indians, and at
The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley. 811
the same time information regarding
these Indians was procured from Milfort,
a French adventurer who, after passing
twenty years among the Creeks as an
agent of Spain, went to offer his services
to France. He had married a sister of
McGillivray, and claimed to be the prin-
cipal war chief of the Creeks. His Me-
moire ou coup d'oeil rapide sur tries dif-
ferens voyages et mon sejour dans la na-
tion Creek is one of the sources for our
knowledge of these Indians ; but he was
a hopeless liar, one of his most interest-
ing concoctions being a statement to the
French government that he had defeat-
ed 10,000 regulars under George Rog-
ers Clark near Detroit by a force of
6000 Northern Indians under his com-
mand. Nevertheless, the French lis-
tened with respect to his assertions that
he could bring about the cession of a large
portion of Creek territory to France, that
the Creeks would form an independent
nation in alliance with that power, and
that 10,000 men would suffice for the
occupation of Louisiana. He was made
general of brigade in the spring of 1796,
and his plans were later taken up by Tal-
leyrand.
Before a final breach with the United
States, France determined to send a new
minister to effect a change in our policy.
Mangourit, the former consul at Charles-
ton, who had been recalled because of the
fact that he had organized the frontiers-
men of the Carolinas and Georgia to co-
operate with Genet's proposed attack on
Louisiana and Florida, was picked out
as the representative. He was an apt
choice, if France expected to tamper
with the West ; but the protests of Mon-
roe resulted in the decision of the Direc-
tors to withhold him, and to break off all
diplomatic connection with the United
States. In August, 1796, Monroe re-
ported from Paris that it was rumored
that France was to make an attempt
upon Canada, which was to be united
with Louisiana and Florida, taking in
such parts of our Western people as were
willing to unite. A little later, Fulton,
who had recently returned from the
United States, was furnishing the Di-
rectors information as to the best time
for occupying Louisiana, and was assur-
ing them that Clark's old soldiers were
loyal to France, and asked only arms,
ammunition, and uniforms, and " their
country will find itself in the vast re-
gions which the Republic will possess."
Toward the end of the year, France
sent a new commission to George Rogers
Clark, as brigadier-general, on the the-
ory (as Delacroix, the Minister of For-
eign Relations, declared) that it was to
the interest of France to foster a favor-
able disposition among the Westerners.
" In case we shall be put in possession
of Louisiana," he wrote, " the affection of
those regions will serve us in our polit-
ical plans toward the United States."
In the meantime Adet, the French
minister to the United States, exerted
every effort to prevent Congress from
voting the appropriations to carry out
Jay's treaty. In fact, as it turned out,
the vote was a close one, but Adet, fore-
seeing defeat, and acting in accordance
with the desire of his government, in
March, 1796, commissioned General Vic-
tor Collot, formerly governor of Guade-
loupe, to travel in the West, and to make
a military survey of the defenses and
lines of communication west of the Alle-
ghanies, along the Ohio and the Missis-
sippi. Collot was gone about ten months,
and as he passed down the rivers, he
pointed out to men whom he trusted the
advantages of accepting French jurisdic-
tion. He made detailed and accurate
plans of the river courses and the Span-
ish posts, which may still be seen in the
atlas that accompanies his Journey in
America, published long afterwards. As
the military expert on whose judgment
the French government had to. rely, his
conclusions have a peculiar interest, and
may be given in his own words : —
" All the positions on the left bank of
the river [Mississippi], in whatever
812 The Diplomatic, Contest for the Mississippi Valley.
point of view they may be considered,
or in whatever mode they may be occu-
pied, without the alliance of the Western
states are far from covering Louisiana :
they are, on the contrary, highly injuri-
ous to this colony ; and the money and
men which might be employed for this
purpose would be ineffectual." In other
words, a Louisiana bounded by the Mis-
sissippi could not be protected against the
neighboring settlements of the United
States. He emphasizes the same idea, in
another connection, as follows : " When
two nations possess, one the coasts and
the other the plains, the former must
inevitably embark or submit. From
thence I conclude that the Western
states of the North American republic
must unite themselves with Louisiana
and form in the future one single com-
pact nation ; else that colony, to what-
ever power it shall belong, will be con-
quered or devoured." As the logical
accompaniment of this conclusion that
Louisiana must embrace the Western
states, Collot drew up a plan for the
defense of the passes of the Alleghanies,
which were to constitute the frontier of
this interior dependency of France to
protect it against the United States.
The Louisiana that Collot contemplated,
therefore, stretched from the Alleghanies
to the Rockies. The importance of his
report is made clearer by the facts that
the minister Adet, and the consul-general
who remained after he left, continually
refer to Collot's work as the basis for
their views on Louisiana, and that Liv-
ingston reported in 1802 that it was ex-
pected that Napoleon would make Collot
second in command in the province of
Louisiana, and that Adet was to be pre-
fect.
In view of these designs, there is a
peculiar significance in the Farewell Ad-
dress which Washington issued while
Collot was making his investigations.
Washington informed the West that " it
must of necessity owe the secure enjoy-
ment of the indispensable outlets for its
own productions to the weight, influence,
and the future maritime strength of the
Atlantic side of the Union, directed by
an indissoluble community of interests
as one nation. Any other tenure by
which the West can hold this essential
advantage, whether derived from its own
separate strength, or from an apostate
and unnatural connection with any for-
eign power, must be intrinsically preca-
rious." He added that the treaties with
Spain and England had given the West-
ern people all that they could desire in
respect to foreign relations, and asked :
" Will it not be their wisdom to rely for
the preservation of these advantages on
the Union by which they were procured ?
Will they not henceforth be deaf to
those advisers, if such there are, who
would sever them from their brethren
and connect them with aliens ? "
As he descended the Mississippi, Col-
lot learned of a plot for an attack under
the English flag upon the Spanish de-
pendencies, and on his return, early in
1797, he notified the Spanish minister
to the United States, who promptly in-
formed the Secretary of State. In the
investigation that followed, it was ascer-
tained that the British minister had been
privy to the plans, and United States Sen-
ator Blount, of Tennessee, lost his seat as
a result of the revelations, which involved
him. The incident revealed how wide-
spread were the forces of intrigue for the
Mississippi Valley, and it gave grounds
for the refusal of the Spanish authorities
to carry out the agreement to yield their
posts on the right bank of the river
while New Orleans was threatened by
an attack down the Mississippi.
It is possible to trace the outlines of
this affair, although it is difficult to fix
the exact measure of England's connec-
tion with it. On October 25, 1795, the
English government had charged Lieu-
tenant-Governor Simcoe, of Canada, to
cultivate such intercourse with the lead-
ing men of the Western settlements of
The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley. 813
the United States as would enable Eng-
land to utilize the services of the fron-
tiersmen against the Spanish settlements,
if war broke out between England and
Spain, and to report what assistance
might be afforded by the Southern and
Western Indians in such an event. In-
formation was also desired with regard
to the communications between Lake
Michigan and the Mississippi, with the
evident idea of using Canadian forces in
the operations. These " most private
and secret " instructions cast light upon
England's policy at this time ; and the
explicit injunctions of caution, lest the
government should be compromised with
Spain and the United States while mat-
ters were preparing, help us to under-
stand that whatever was to be done
must be managed secretly.
War was declared by Spain against
England in the fall of 1796. The rumors
that France was to acquire Louisiana
alarmed land speculators on the west-
ern waters, who feared the effect of the
power of France to close the river, and
even to secure the territory along its
eastern bank. Among these men was
Senator Blount, who owned some 73,000
acres. He was the most important figure
in his own section, having held the posi-
tion of governor of the Southwest terri-
tory, and the management of Indian af-
fairs in that quarter. Thus his influence
extended among all the Indian agents
and traders of that turbulent region.
The loyalists at Natchez also were struck
with alarm at the prospect of French
sovereignty. In the course of the fall
and winter of 1796—97, a plan was con-
certed between Blount, Dr. Romayne, a
land speculator, who had just returned
from Great Britain, Captain Chisholm
(who had served Blount in Tennessee,
and who was in Philadelphia in the in-
terests of the Natchez Tories), and In-
dians and British Indian agents from
New York and Canada. The plan was
submitted to the English minister by
Chisholm, for Blount did not deal di-
rectly with Liston, and, indeed, the min-
ister assured his government later that,
while he was aware that important men
in the West would be concerned in the
expedition, he did not know that Blount
himself was involved in it.
The outlines of the proposition were
as follows : a force of Pennsylvania
and New York frontiersmen, with Brant
and his Indians, was to attack New
Madrid on the Mississippi, and proceed
by the head of the Red River to the
Spanish silver mines. Tennessee, Ken-
tucky, and Natchez settlers, with the
Choctaw Indians, led by Blount, were to
capture New Orleans ; while the Chero-
kees, Creeks, and white settlers in Flor-
ida, under the direction of Chisholm,
were to take West Florida. Great Britain
was to furnish a fleet to block the mouth
of the Mississippi while the attack was
in progress, and was to become the mis-
tress of Louisiana and Florida.
The British minister was sanguine
enough to believe that the United States
itself would be glad to see this plan car-
ried into execution, if it could be effected
with rapid success. He corresponded
with the Governor of Canada, to ascer-
tain the practicability of furnishing sup-
plies from that quarter, and in the spring
of 1797 he paid the passage money of
Chisholm to England, in order to allow
the government to pass upon the project.
At the same time George Rogers Clark
wrote to his friends in France that Eng-
lish agents from Canada were enrolling
volunteers in Kentucky for the conquest
of Louisiana and Santa Fd, and asserted
that he had received propositions from
the Governor of Canada to march at
the head of 2000 men against New Mex-
ico, — an offer which he says he de-
clined because of his loyalty to French
interests. General Elijah Clarke, of
Georgia, the seasoned filibusterer of the
Oconee River and Amelia Island, also
came forward with allegations of Eng-
lish attempts to buy his services. Cer-
tain it is that the frontier was in ferment.
814 The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley.
But the exposure came when, in July,
President Adams submitted to Congress
evidence that Senator Blount had made
efforts to engage the Indian agents of the
United States in the Southwest in his un-
lawful schemes. He was expelled from
the Senate, and the investigation, which
Liston vainly endeavored to prevent, gave
such publicity to the plot that, if the Eng-
lish government ever had actively en-
gaged in it, it was obliged to abandon the
project. Liston made denial for his gov-
ernment of complicity, although he ad-
mitted accepting and transmitting infor-
mation. Indeed, he went farther, and
denied that England intended, or had
intended, any attack upon Upper Louisi-
ana, adding, on the authority of his
government, that the impropriety of vio-
lating our neutral territory, and the in-
humanity of the use of Indians, would
induce the king's ministers to reject any
such plan. These assertions are interest-
ing in view of the instructions previously
given to Simcoe.
It is only fair to assume that the ac-
tivity of the individuals engaged in pro-
moting the undertaking may have given
reason to the frontier leaders to believe
that the men who made propositions to
them acted with a direct authority which
they did not possess ; but the policy of
the British government permitted the use
or disavowal of just such attempts accord-
ing as they met its needs.
From the point of view of the larger
diplomatic problem, the most tangible
result of the affair was the retention of
Natchez and the other posts east of the
Mississippi by Spain, under the sincere
apprehension that if they were evacuated,
in accordance with the treaty of 1795,
a clear road would be opened for the
British into Louisiana. Not until the
spring of 1798 did Spain actually evacu-
ate these forts.
After the rupture of diplomatic rela-
tions with France the Federalists pro-
ceeded in the early summer of 1797 to
enact laws for raising an army and pro-
viding a fleet, and for the necessary loans
and taxes in preparation for war with
the Republic. But, less radical than
some of his advisers, and ready to make
another effort to adjust our affairs with
France, President Adams sent a com-
mission to reopen negotiations, in spite
of his chagrin that the previous minis-
ter, C. C. Pinckney, had been summa-
rily refused and ordered out of France.
When this commission sailed, Talley-
rand had just become the master of the
foreign policy of his country. He had
returned from his sojourn in the United
States, convinced that Americans were
hopelessly attached to England, and that
France must have Louisiana. In a me-
moir to the Institute he pointed out that
Louisiana would serve the commercial
needs of France, would prove a granary
for a great West Indian colonial power,
and would be a useful outlet for the dis-
contented revolutionists, who could find
room for their energies in building up the
New World. It was his policy to play
with the American representatives, re-
fusing to deal with them except informal-
ly through agents, and while detaining
them, to negotiate with Spain for Louisi-
ana. These so-called X. Y. Z. negotia-
tions extended till the spring of 1798,
when Marshall and Pinckney, outraged
by demands for bribes, and hopeless of re-
sults, left Paris. Gerry, deluded by Tal-
leyrand, remained to keep the peace, and
while the adroit diplomat deceived Gerry,
he instructed Guillemardet, his minister
at Madrid, to make Spain realize that that
government had been blind to its inter-
ests in putting the United States into
possession of the Mississippi forts ; they
meant, he declared, to rule alone ' in
America, and to influence Europe. . No
other means existed for putting an end
to their ambition than that of " shutting
them up within the limits which nature
seems to have traced for them." There
can be little doubt that Talleyrand intend-
ed the Alleghanies by this expression.
France, he argued, if placed in possession
The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley. 815
of Louisiana and Florida, would be a
" wall of brass forever impenetrable to
the combined efforts of England and
America."
Foreseeing the tendency of France to
carry her influence over Spain to the
point of absolute domination, Godoy had
resigned in March, 1798, after a vain
effort to induce the king to break with
France. But although the latter power
greatly gained in influence after Godoy's
retirement, Spain was not yet weak
enough to yield Louisiana, and France
was forced to wait for the energy of Na-
poleon to wring this province from its
reluctant owner.
In the meantime the publication of the
X. Y. Z. correspondence brought the
United States to the verge of declaring
war against France. Indeed, hostilities
were authorized at sea, the aged Wash-
ington was made titular head of the army,
while Hamilton and Knox were rivals for
the position of second in command.
Here was an opportunity made to hand
for Miranda, the old-time friend and cor-
respondent of these men. Alarmed lest
Spain should drift completely under
French domination and yield her empire
in the New World, in the beginning of
1798 Pitt summoned Miranda to Lon-
don, and discussed with him the project
of revolutionizing Spanish America.
Miranda proposed an alliance between
England, the United States, and South
America, which should give indepen-
dence to Spanish America and open its
commerce. The passage of the Isthmus
of Panama was to be " forthwith com-
pleted," and the control of the waterway
to be given to England for a certain num-
ber of years. There were to be mutual
arrangements with regard to division of
territory. In return, England was to
furnish 8000 foot and 2000 horse, to-
gether with her Pacific squadron ; while
from the United States were expected
5000 woodsmen who understood new
countries, officered by Revolutionary vet-
erans.
These proposals Pitt held under ad-
visement. If the Spanish government
were overthrown and the resources and
colonies of Spain placed at the disposal
of France, England was prepared to set
Spanish America free, and would nego-
tiate for joint action to this end with the
United States. Ruf us King, our minister
in England, eagerly accepted this idea
of cooperation, and by January, 1799,
he was urging upon Hamilton that the
time had come to settle the system of the
American nations, while England was
ready to assist us in accomplishing in
South America what we had accom-
plished in North America. " For God's
sake give attention to it," he begged.
Hamilton was not averse to engaging
in the enterprise, but he believed that
the United States should furnish the en-
tire land forces. This would have given
to him the military leadership. But
President Adams, hard-headed and de-
void of dreams of conquests in the South,
saw that in such an alliance England
would be the gainer. He regarded Mi-
randa's plan as absurd, and rightly be-
lieved he had no effective force in
America. Doubting whether Pitt had
been bewitched by this Venezuelan agi-
tator, or whether he was trying to dupe
us into war with France, the President
firmly declined to answer Miranda's let-
ters, or to open negotiations for the
proposed conquest of Spanish America.
As soon as Napoleon's overtures paved
the way he sent a new embassy to Paris,
and on September 30, 1800, a treaty
was made which restored France and
America to friendly relations. The next
day the subtle and forceful Corsican se-
cured the secret retrocession of Louisiana
to France. His material power, and the
tempting offer of the beautiful land of
Tuscany, rich in art and literature, to the
royal house of Spain, proved effective.
The rest of the story is a familiar one.
Napoleon made the peace of Amiens
with England, and in the lull prepared
to erect a colonial empire in America.
816 The Diplomatic Contest for the Mississippi Valley.
His army would first occupy San Do-
mingo, and then Louisiana, the continen-
tal feeder to the West Indies. He would
acquire the Floridas, and in time make
of the Gulf of Mexico a French lake.
His agents should establish friendly rela-
tions among the settlers beyond the Alle-
ghanies, while alliances with the South-
western Indians within our borders should
serve to defend Louisiana and Florida
from attack. There can be no doubt
that once in control of the Mississippi
and the Gulf he would have set himself to
the task of extending his province to the
Alleghanies. Lord Hawkesbury, the Brit-
ish Minister of Foreign Affairs, warned
Rufus King in 1801 that " the acquisi-
tion might enable France to extend her
influence and perhaps her dominion up
the Mississippi and through the Great
Lakes, even to Canada. This would be
realizing the plan, to prevent the accom-
plishment of which the Seven Years'
War took place."
But before he occupied Louisiana,
Napoleon undertook to subdue the negro
insurrection in San Domingo, and fever
and slaughter ruined his armies of occu-
pation. He had founded his system on
restoring this island to its once proud
position as the centre of West Indian
commerce, and he delayed taking posses-
sion of Louisiana until the interval of
peace was at an end. But the strength
of English sea power, and the danger of
a union of the forces of England and the
United States in time of war, would make
the transfer of a large army to occupy
Louisiana under hostile conditions a haz-
ardous enterprise. Was it, after all, worth
the cost, since its value was not so much
immediate, as in that remote future
which lay before the power that domi-
nated the Mississippi ?
If considerations like these engaged
Napoleon's thought, the vigorous repre-
sentations of Jefferson would have rein-
forced them. When it became clear that
Louisiana had passed to France, he wrote
our minister, Livingston, a letter, in-
tended also for the perusal of Napoleon,
which showed that the lessons of the long
and tortuous intrigues for the possession
of the mouth of the Mississippi had sunk
deeply into his mind. Confronted with
the danger of French occupation of the
mouth of the Mississippi, he saw that he
must throw aside his old antipathy to
England, navies, alliances, and conquests,
and grasp at that policy of an English
alliance for the domination of North and
. South America, which so vigorous a
Federalist as John Adams had rejected.
" The day that France takes possession
of New Orleans," he wrote, " fixes the
sentence which is to restrain her forever
within her low-water mark. It seals
the union of two nations who, in con-
junction, can maintain exclusive posses-
sion of the ocean. From that moment
we must marry ourselves to the British
fleet and nation. We must turn all our
attention to a maritime force, for which
our resources place us on very high
ground ; and having formed and con-
nected together a power which may ren-
der reenforcement of her settlements
here impossible to France, make the
first cannon which shall be fired in Eu-
rope the signal for the tearing up of any
settlement she may have made, and for
holding the two continents of America
in sequestration for the common pur-
poses of the united British and Ameri-
can nations." Jefferson perceived clear-
ly that European possession of the mouth
of the Mississippi would necessarily in-
volve North America in the system of
the Old World.
When the French minister Adet was
striving to secure the election of Jeffer-
son to the Presidency in 1796, he re-
ported to his government an estimate of
the great Virginian's character which
strikingly illustrates this letter. He said :
" I do not know whether, as I am told,
we will always find in him a man entirely
devoted to our interests. Mr. Jefferson
likes us because he detests England ; he
seeks to unite with us because he sus-
Training in Taste.
817
pects us less than Great Britain, but he
would change his sentiments toward us
to-morrow, perhaps, if to-morrow Great
Britain ceased to inspire him with fear.
Jefferson, although a friend of liberty
and the sciences, although an admirer of
the efforts which we have made to break
our chains and dissipate the cloud of
ignorance which weighs upon mankind,
Jefferson, I say, is an American, and, by
that title, it is impossible for him to be
sincerely our friend. An American is
the born enemy of European peoples."
But with his passion for peace, Jeffer-
son was in no haste to apply the rigorous
programme of hostility. He preferred
to put off the day of contention till our
population in the valley increased so that
" it could do its own business." In the
instructions which he gave to Monroe in
March, 1803, on sending him as a special
envoy to France, he set the maximum de-
sire of the United States at New Orleans
and the Floridas. To secure them he
was even ready to give to France an ab-
solute guarantee of the west bank of the
Mississippi. But his minimum demand
was simply for the continuation of the
right of deposit, to insure the freedom of
navigation of the river. It was the " bar-
ren sand, . . . formed by the Gulf Stream
in its circular course round the Mexican
Gulf," and lying at the mouth of the
Mississippi, that he coveted, for it con-
trolled the destiny of the Great Valley.
Impetuous and swift in his decisions,
Napoleon, while Monroe was still at sea,
abandoned his hopes of a great colonial
empire on the Gulf of Mexico, resolved
on war with England, and ordered that
all of Louisiana should be offered to the
Union. On April 30, 1803, the treaty
was dated which brought to an end these
years of intrigue between European pow-
ers for the control over the interior of
North America, and for the domination
of the desintegrating empire of Spain.
From that cession dates the emancipation
of North America from the state systems
of Europe, and the rise of the United
States into the position of a world power,
the arbiter of America.
Frederick J. Turner.
TRAINING IN TASTE.
THE desire to have good taste must be
almost universal, for its possession im-
plies so much that is honorable. It is
an interesting question, whether good
taste may be acquired or communicated,
and, if so, to what degree. Assuredly
few persons set out consciously upon a
quest for it. It is generally felt that it
is a gift rather than an accomplishment,
being chiefly a matter of temperament
and instinct. Education may have much
to do with its development ; culture,
which Matthew Arnold defines as " the
acquainting ourselves with the best that
has been known and said in the world,"
still more ; but experience, life itself, is
the only school in which the man of taste
VOL. xcin. — NO. 560. 52
can take his final degree. Learning and
taste do not always run together, for we
all know that there are educated persons
who have very little taste, and, on the
other hand, we know that there are illit-
erate persons who possess a " general
susceptibility to truth and nobleness,"
which is Carlyle's definition of taste. In-
deed, the difference between knowledge
and culture is as wide as that between
knowledge and wisdom. Almost every
one may acquire a certain degree of edu-
cation, but as for really " acquainting
ourselves " with the best things in the
world, that is something which, with the
best will imaginable, will never come at
the beck of mere intellect. We are so
818
Training in Taste.
made that we cannot know the things
that we do not love, even as we cannot
love the things we do not know.
Thus a prosaic and unimaginative na-
ture can never get into real contact with
the classics ; for the sensitiveness to fine
impressions, which is a necessary condi-
tion of creative work of a high type, is
equally requisite for the complete appre-
ciation of that work. Although it is not
necessary for a man to be a Dante in
order to understand and relish the Di-
vine Comedy, he must have some mental
affinity to the author, — a similar vein
of potential poetry in his nature. There
must be that in him which vibrates in
response to the call of genius. Intellect
and culture are not enough ; there must
be the heart to feel as well as the mind
to grasp the meaning.
Scientific criticism may be useful in
its way, but there is a higher kind of
criticism, which employs sympathy more
than naked facts of history in order to in-
terpret the spirit of work. It deals with
results more than with methods. No
analysis, no laboratory test, for Titian's
color, for Milton's diction ! That way pe-
dantry lies. Yet " the acquainting our-
selves with the best that has been known
and said in the world " is not a passive
achievement. Sublime revelations of
truth and beauty await our coming to
them ; but we must meet them halfway.
All your life you have heard of Rem-
brandt,— clarum et venerabile nomen!
— and have taken him, as it were, upon
faith ; but some bright morning, while
you loiter in a gallery of engravings, you
have perhaps come upon a little etching
of a New Testament scene, drawn with
a curiously awkward yet impassioned
touch, and giving forth such poignant
expression, such a full tide of emotional
life, that all the unspeakable, tragic gran-
deur of the history of the Man of Sor-
rows seems compacted in that diminutive
bit of scratched copper.
In respect to works of art of all
classes, from music and poetry to archi-
tecture and sculpture, it is not so much
perfection that we are to expect and de-
sire, as a certain combination of traits,
which, by the laws of our individual
temperaments, are peculiarly adapted to
arouse in us sympathetic enthusiasm.
This is why we choose our friends,
sweethearts, wives, politics, religions, to
suit ourselves, not to conform to some
general or ideal standard, still less to
suit the neighbors. Let us be loyal to
our preferences, and have the courage
of our prejudices. If a man can see
nothing that is good in Botticelli, Burne-
Jones, or Claude Monet, let him say so
candidly ; there is a reason for it ; and
even if that reason be somewhat unrea-
sonable, it is imperative to be honest.
The keystone of the arch of art is ex-
pressed in Polonius's counsel to Laertes,
" To thine own self be true."
Nor does a negative attitude of mind
with reference to the works of certain
authors convey any imputation of their
inferiority. We may be simply indif-
ferent at present ; it does not follow that
we shall be so always ; we are open to
conviction, and therefore shall not miss
much that is good ; every free man has
the right to change his mind when he
receives new light. To suppose that
there is any sort of moral obligation to
understand, approve, and enjoy all the
good books, pictures, music, and monu-
ments in existence, would be to suppose
an aesthetic impossibility. No one can
eat all the dishes named in the bill of
fare. We must economize our appetites,
partaking of that food only which we
can relish and assimilate. The maxim
de gustibus non est disputandum is
neither wholly true nor wholly false. It
is certain that the free exercise of indi-
vidual taste is perfectly allowable, more
than that, is perfectly desirable, and this
will inevitably lead to some differences
of opinion ; yet it is as certain that there
are fundamental principles of choice,
common to all the arts, and as a corol-
lary there is a standard of excellence
Training in Taste.
819
which in due time is recognized by all
good authorities.
If the charm, nobility, and beauty of
simple honesty in the realm of taste
were only realized, mere differences of
opinion would count for little. It is of
no avail to learn things by rote, after
the manner of the multiplication tables.
In the aesthetic world we must be ad-
venturous, hardy, and independent, use
our own eyes and minds, discover new
continents for ourselves, experience the
sensations of explorers, finding our own
way. It is of little use to believe that
two and two make four because some
one has said so. We must project the
fact in our imaginations, realize it, and
be convinced of it by our own reason.
Nevertheless, when there is a virtually
unanimous consensus of expert opinion
as to the merits of any work, would it
not be an absurd display of egotism to
set up a dissenting judgment ? A wait-
ing attitude is the wiser part, neither
scornful nor obsequious. Questions of
taste are not settled by universal suf-
frage, nor by personal whims, but by the
edicts of the intellectual elite in all ages
and generations of men. So, while we
are at liberty to reserve our opinions
in those instances where the accumulat-
ed testimony of authoritative criticism
points one way, it is at least probable
that it is sound. With all the allow-
ances that must be made for individual-
ity, there is, after all, a standard of taste
on which all competent judges may unite.
Though they may differ about minor
matters, they agree finally as to the es-
sentials.
A thoughtful person is in no danger
of remaining neutral for long with re-
gard to any important issue. Frank dis-
cussion is useful, but controversy and con-
tention seldom lead to any valuable con-
clusions. As in ethics, so in aesthetics ;
unless the mind is busied with good
thoughts, it will gravitate toward bad
ones, for it cannot remain empty. Con-
tact with good literature, since this is
an age of reading, is doubtless the most
effectual formative condition for the cul-
tivation of taste ; and when this may
be supplemented by contact with good
architecture, sculpture, and pictures, the
whole trend of mental development
should be upward. The growth of taste,
however, will vary in rapidity and
thoroughness in strict accordance with
each individual temperament ; in no case
is it possible for it to outrun the in-
nate " susceptibility to truth and noble-
ness."
The influence of personal example is
worth any amount of didacticism. I had
a friend, who, without much education,
and without any of the advantages of
travel, possessed the finest native in-
stinct for all things in nature and art
that are fine and true. Association with
him amounted to a liberal, though un-
academic, education in art appreciation.
His intellect, undisciplined by bookish
studies, was singularly alert, keen, and
vigorous. His conversation was more
picturesque and pithy than lettered, but
his intuitive wisdom was seldom at fault,
as is sometimes the way with those who
have studied men and things more than
textbooks. He could not have told you
what school Mantegna belonged to, per-
haps ; but his nature was stirred to its
depths by any and every manifestation
of a passion for beauty, whether in life
or art. I think he could be called, in
the fullest sense of the word, a connois-
seur; for he knew. But his knowledge
came from within. He obeyed the in-
ner light. His example taught me to
observe things ; my eyes were opened to
the humble and casual revelations of
every-day beauty, grandeur, and signifi-
cance, all about, which we have but to
look for in order to find. When I think
of this great-hearted friend, who could
derive more exquisite emotion from the
contemplation of a wild flower in the
woods than most people are capable of
feeling in front of a Raphael or on the
first sight of Mont Blanc, I have little
820
Training in Taste.
patience with the prattle of so-called
artists about their dependence upon an
"art atmosphere." " Coelum non ani-
inani mutant, qui trans mare currunt."
So far as a philosophy of taste exists,
its teachings ought to be affirmative
rather than negative. It is more im-
portant to know what to attain than to
know what to avoid. The mind of the
civilized man is open to impressions, and
the first condition of aesthetic culture is
mental hospitality. The terms most fre-
quently used in the philosophy of ethics
occur with equal pertinence in the field
of aesthetics, — integrity, purity, eleva-
tion, dignity, elegance, finish, reposeful-
ness, balance, poise, and the like. A
sense of humor is of great usefulness
in counteracting the opposite tendencies
toward pedantiy, conventionality, and
priggishness. But one should know when
to be serious. The habit of perpetual
banter is pernicious. A normal and
wholesome degree of sensuousness is also
an important factor in the development of
taste. Without it no vital art is possible.
The safeguard against its abuse is not
asceticism, but moral enthusiasm, — the
passion for righteousness, — which is the
supreme thing in English literature, for
instance.
In the presence of a new work of art,
many persons stand on guard, defiant,
suspicious, timid, as if afraid of being
tricked into undue admiration or enjoy-
ment. Those who are on the watch for
flaws can always find some. All criti-
cism is a confession, in which the critic
lays bare his own limitations. What we
need in criticism, an old painter once said
to me, is a nourishing, and not a destruc-
tive system. The reflex effect of the
censorious habit is very belittling. Sar-
casm is a two-edged weapon, and must
be handled with vast discretion. Yet we
do not care to learn the opinions of his-
torians who are so excessively good-na-
tured, catholic, and charitable that they
love everything.
I do not like to hear people speak of
their preferences in an apologetic tone.
Affectation is the only unpardonable sin
in the realm of taste, so none of us need
be ashamed of liking certain things that
are not strictly first-rate. It is so tire-
some to hear opinions put forth with a
preface excusing their inadequacy, that
one sometimes welcomes heartily the
blunt declaration of the man who pro-
claims Ouida or the Duchess the greatest
of novelists, and believes that John G.
Brown's pictures are truer to life than
those of John La Farge.
A little taste is a dangerous thing. A
large class of would-be aesthetes partake
of the characteristics of poor Mr. Winkle,
who was constantly getting into dreadful
scrapes because he hated to acknowledge
that he did not know. It is this ambi-
tious but vulnerable class which is for-
ever engaged in a still hunt for the latest
and costliest fashion in apparel, furni-
ture, fiction, philosophy, food, sport, —
I had almost said religion. Each new
style, or fad, is passed along in some
occult, wireless way, with marvelous
promptitude, and makes its presence felt
with the agility of the most recent mi-
crobe. There are those whose conver-
sation is ingeniously made to convey the
information that the speaker is in touch
with the only correct line of contempo-
rary thought on all the things I have
named.
The reason for the inextricable rela-
tion which exists between ethics and
aesthetics is that the only durable kind
of beauty is spiritual or moral beauty,
of which material beauty is but the ex-
terior symbol. I can exemplify this in
no simpler way than by taking the art
of Velasquez as a concrete illustration.
This painter stands, in an exceptionally
perfect manner, for all that is noble,
dignified, lucid, and refined. The chief
attributes of civilization — character,
intellect, culture, gentleness of demeanor
and conduct — are his constant theme
and inspiration. By his supreme integ-
The Cry of the Old House. 821
rity, and the lofty and pure style which cracy, the aristocracy of merit, where
results from it, he lends to civilization a all forms of meanness and vulgarity are
new lustre. It may be said that to know out of the question. Never were style
Velasquez is a liberal education in taste, and the man more completely identical.
His severity and reserve are among his The moral superiority of Velasquez is
high merits, for they belong to an art so natural, so easy, so much a matter of
in which self - respect is a conspicuous course, that the perfection of his style,
element. His work is measured, poised, growing out of it, becomes a sort of moral
sober, never florid, nor rhetorical. In excellence in itself. Such painting is an
contemplating his pictures we are enter- act of high morality, — a luminous em-
ing a natural atmosphere of real aristo- bodiment of virtue.
William Howe Downes.
THE CRY OF THE OLD HOUSE.
COME back !
My little lads, come back!
My little maids, with starched frocks ;
My lads, my maids, come back !
The poplar trees are black
Against the keen, lone, throbbing sky;
The tang of the old box
Fills the clear dusk from wall to wall,
And the dews fall.
Come back !
I watch, I cry :
Leave the rude wharf, the mart ;
Come back !
Else shall I break my heart.
Am I forgot ;
My days as they were not ? —
The warm, sweet, crooning tunes ;
The Sunday afternoons,
Wrought but for you ;
The larkspurs growing tall,
You wreathed in pink and blue,
Within your prayer-books small ;
The cupboards carved both in and out,
With curious, prickly vine,
And smelling far and fine ;
The pictures in a row,
Of folk you did not know ;
The toys, the games, the shrill, gay rout;
The lanterns, that at hour for bed,
A charmed, but homely red,
Went flickering from shed to shed ;
822 The Cry of the Old House.
The fagots crumbling, spicy, good,
Brought in from the great wood ;
The Dark that held you all about ;
The Wind that would not go ? —
Come back, my women and my men,
And take them all again!
Not yet, not yet,
Can you forget —
For you that are a man,
You battle not or reap, you dream nor plan ;
And you, so gray of look,
You cannot pluck a rose, or read a book,
Do aught for faith, or fame, or tears,
But I am there with all my years.
Oh, one and all,
When at the evenfall,
Your slim girls sing out on the stair,
Lo, I am there !
When blow the cherry boughs so fair
Athwart your slender town yards far away,
Lo, all at once you have no word to say ;
For at your throat a sharp, strange thing —
An old house set in an old spring!
Come back!
Come up the still, accustomed, wistful lands,
The poplar-haunted lands.
You need not call,
For I shall know,
And light the candles tall,
Set wine and loaf a-row.
Come back !
Unlatch the door,
And fall upon my heart once more.
For I shall comfort you, oh lad ;
Oh, daughter, I shall make you wholly glad!
The wreck, the wrong,
The unavailing throng,
The sting, the smart,
Shall be as they were not,
Forgot, forgot !
Come back,
And fall upon my heart!
Lizette Woodworth Reese.
Baxter's Procrustes.
823
BAXTER'S PROCRUSTES.
BAXTER'S Procrustes is one of the
publications of the Bodleian Club. The
Bodleian Club is composed of gentlemen
of culture, who are interested in books
and book-collecting. It was named, very
obviously, after the famous library of the
same name, and not only became in our
city a sort of shrine for local worshipers
of fine bindings and rare editions, but
was visited occasionally by pilgrims from
afar. The Bodleian has entertained
Mark Twain, Joseph Jefferson, and other
literary and histrionic celebrities. It pos-
sesses quite a collection of personal me-
mentos of distinguished authors, among
them a paperweight which once belonged
to Goethe, a lead pencil used by Emerson,
an autograph letter of Matthew Arnold,
and a chip from a tree felled by Mr.
Gladstone. Its library contains a num-
ber of rare books, including a fine collec-
tion on chess, of which game several of
the members are enthusiastic devotees.
The activities of the club are not, how-
ever, confined entirely to books. We
have a very handsome clubhouse, and
much taste and discrimination have been
exercised in its adornment. There are
many good paintings, including portraits
of the various presidents of the club,
which adorn the entrance hall. After
books, perhaps the most distinctive fea-
ture of the club is our collection of pipes.
In a large rack in the smoking-room —
really a superfluity, since smoking is
permitted all over the house — is as com-
plete an assortment of pipes as perhaps
exists in the civilized world. Indeed, it
is an unwritten rule of the club that no
one is eligible for membership who can-
not produce a new variety of pipe, which
is filed with his application for member-
ship, and, if he passes, deposited with the
club collection, he, however, retaining
the title in himself. Once a year, upon
.the anniversary of the death of Sir Wal-
ter Raleigh, who, it will be remembered,
first introduced tobacco into England,
the full membership of the club, as a
rule, turns out. A large supply of the
very best smoking mixture is laid in.
At nine o'clock sharp each member takes
his pipe from the rack, fills it with to-
bacco, and then the whole club, with the
president at the head, all smoking furi-
ously, march in solemn procession from
room to room, upstairs and downstairs,
making the tour of the clubhouse and
returning to the smoking-room. The
president then delivers an address, and
each member is called upon to say some-
thing, either by way of a quotation or an
original sentiment, in praise of the vir-
tues of nicotine. This ceremony — face-
tiously known as " hitting the pipe " —
being thus concluded, the membership
pipes are carefully cleaned out and re-
placed in the club rack.
As I have said, however, the raison
d'etre of the club, and the feature upon
which its fame chiefly rests, is its collec-
tion of rare books, and of these by far
the most interesting are its own publica-
tions. Even its catalogues are works
of art, published in numbered editions,
and sought by libraries and book-collec-
tors. Early in its history it began the
occasional publication of books which
should meet the club standard, — books
in which emphasis should be laid upon
the qualities that make a book valuable
in the eyes of collectors. Of these, age
could not, of course, be imparted, but in
the matter of fine and curious bindings,
of hand-made linen papers, of uncut or
deckle edges, of wide margins and limited
editions, the club could control its own
publications. The matter of contents
was, it must be confessed, a less impor-
tant consideration. At first it was felt
by the publishing committee that nothing
but the finest products of the human
824
Baxter's Procrustes.
mind should be selected for enshrinement
in the beautiful volumes which the club
should issue. The length of the work
was an important consideration, — long
things were not compatible with wide
margins and graceful slenderness. For
instance, we brought out Coleridge's An-
cient Mariner, an essay by Emerson, and
another by Thoreau. Our Rubaiyai of
Omar Khayyam was Heron - Allen's
translation of the original MS. in the Bod-
leian Library at Oxford, which, though
less poetical than FitzGerald's, was not
so common. Several years ago we began
to publish the works of our own mem-
bers. Bascom's Essay on Pipes was a
very creditable performance. It was pub-
lished in a limited edition of one hundred
copies, and since it had not previously
appeared elsewhere and was copyrighted
by the club, it was sufficiently rare to be
valuable for that reason. The second
publication of local origin was Baxter's
Procrustes.
I have omitted to say that once or
twice a year, at a meeting of which no-
tice has been given, an auction is held at
the Bodleian. The members "of the club
send in their duplicate copies, or books
they for any reason wish to dispose of,
which are auctioned off to the highest
bidder. At these sales, which are well
attended, the club's publications have of
recent years formed the leading feature.
Three years ago, number three of Bas-
com's Essay on Pipes sold for fifteen dol-
lars ; — the original cost of publication
was one dollar and seventy-five cents.
Later in the evening an uncut copy of the
same brought thirty dollars. At the next
auction the price of the cut copy was run
up to twenty-five dollars, while the un-
cut copy was knocked down at seventy-
five dollars. The club had always appre-
ciated the value of uncut copies, but this
financial indorsement enhanced their de-
sirability immensely. This rise in the
Essay on Pipes was not without a sym-
pathetic effect upon all the club publica-
tions. The Emerson essay rose from
three dollars to seventeen, and the Tho-
reau, being by an author less widely read,
and by his own confession commercially
unsuccessful, brought a somewhat higher
figure. The prices, thus inflated, were
not permitted to come down appreciably.
Since every member of the club pos-
sessed one or more of these valuable
editions, they were all manifestly inter-
ested in keeping up the price. The pub-
lication, however, which brought the
highest prices, and, but for the sober
second thought, might have wrecked the
whole system, was Baxter's Procrustes.
Baxter was, perhaps, the most schol-
arly member of the club. A graduate
of Harvard, he had traveled extensively,
had read widely, and while not so en-
thusiastic a collector as some of us, pos-
sessed as fine a private library as any
man of his age in the city. He was
about thirty-five when he joined the
club, and apparently some bitter experi-
ence— some disappointment in love or
ambition — had left its mark upon his
character. With light, curly hair, fair
complexion, and gray eyes, one would
have expected Baxter to be genial of
temper, with a tendency toward wordi-
ness of speech. But though he had oc-
casional flashes of humor, his ordinary
demeanor was characterized by a mild
cynicism, which, with his gloomy pessi-
mistic philosophy, so foreign to the
temperament that should accompany his
physical type, could only be accounted
for upon the hypothesis of some secret
sorrow such as I have suggested. What
it might be no one knew. He had means
and social position, and was an uncom-
monly handsome man. The fact that he
remained unmarried at thirty-five fur-
nished some support for the theory of a
disappointment in love, though this the
several intimates of Baxter who belonged
to the club were not able to verify.
It had occurred to me, in a vague
way, that perhaps Baxter might be an
unsuccessful author. That he was a
poet we knew very well, and typewritten
Baxter's Procrustes.
825
copies of his verses had occasionally cir-
culated among us. But Baxter had al-
ways expressed such a profound con-
tempt for modern literature, had always
spoken in terms of such unmeasured pity
for the slaves of the pen, who were de-
pendent upon the whim of an undis-
criminating public for recognition and a
livelihood, that no one of us had ever sus-
pected him of aspirations toward publi-
cation, until, as I have said, it occurred
to me one day that Baxter's attitude with
regard to publication might be viewed
in the light of effect as well as of cause,
— that his scorn of publicity might as
easily arise from failure to achieve it,
as his never having published might be
due to his preconceived disdain of the
vulgar popularity which one must share
with the pugilist or balloonist of the hour.
The notion of publishing Baxter's
Procrustes did not emanate from Bax-
ter, — I must do him the justice to say
this. But he had spoken to several of
the fellows about the theme of his poem,
until the notion that Baxter was at
work upon something fine had become
pretty well disseminated throughout our
membership. He would occasionally
read brief passages to a small coterie of
friends in the sitting-room or library, —
never more than ten lines at once, or to
more than five people at a time, — and
these excerpts gave at least a few of us
a pretty fair idea of the motive and
scope of the poem. As I, for one, ga-
thered, it was quite along the line of
Baxter's philosophy. Society was the
Procrustes which, like the Greek bandit
of old, caught every man born into the
world, and endeavored to fit him to some
preconceived standard, generally to the
one for which he was least adapted.
The world was full of men and women
who were merely square pegs in round
holes, and vice versa. Most marriages
were unhappy because the contracting
parties were not properly mated. Re-
ligion was mostly superstition, science
for the most part sciolism, popular edu-
cation merely a means of forcing the
stupid and repressing the bright, so that
all the youth of the rising generation
might conform to the same dull, dead
level of democratic mediocrity. Life
would soon become so monotonously uni-
form and so uniformly monotonous as to
be scarce worth the living.
It was Smith, I think, who first pro-
posed that the club publish Baxter's
Procrustes. The poet himself did not
seem enthusiastic when the subject was
broached ; he demurred for some little
time, protesting that the poem was not
worthy of publication. But when it was
proposed that the edition be limited to
fifty copies he agreed to consider the
proposition. When I suggested, having
in mind my secret theory of Baxter's
failure in authorship, that the edition
would at least be in the hands of friends,
that it would be difficult for a hostile
critic to secure a copy, and that if it
should not achieve success from a literary
point of view, the extent of the failure
would be limited to the size of the edition,
Baxter was visibly impressed. When
the literary committee at length decided
to request formally of Baxter the privi-
lege of publishing his Procrustes, he con-
sented, with evident reluctance, upon
condition that he should supervise the
printing, binding, and delivery of the
books, merely submitting to the com-
mittee, in advance, the manuscript, and
taking their views in regard to the book-
making.
The manuscript was duly presented to
the literary committee. Baxter having
expressed the desire that the poem be
not read aloud at a meeting of the club,
as was the custom, since he wished it to
be given to the world clad in suitable
garb, the committee went even farther.
Having entire confidence in Baxter's
taste and scholarship, they, with great
delicacy, refrained from even reading the
manuscript, contenting themselves with
Baxter's statement of the general theme
and the topics grouped under it. The
826
Baxter's Procrustes.
details of the bookmaking, however, were
gone into thoroughly. The paper was
to be of hand-made linen, from the Kelm-
scott Mills ; the type black-letter, with
rubricated initials. The cover, which
was Baxter's own selection, was to be of
dark green morocco, with a cap-and-bells
border in red inlays, and doublures of
maroon morocco with a blind-tooled de-
sign. Baxter was authorized to contract
with the printer and superintend the pub-
lication. The whole edition of fifty num-
bered copies was to be disposed of at
auction, in advance, to the highest bid-
der, only one copy to each, the proceeds
to be devoted to paying for the printing
and binding, the remainder, if any, to
go into the club treasury, and Baxter
himself to receive one copy by way of
remuneration. Baxter was inclined to
protest at this, on the ground that his
copy would probably be worth more than
the royalties on the edition, at the usual
ten per cent, would amount to, but was
finally prevailed upon to accept an au-
thor's copy.
While the Procrustes was under con-
sideration, some one read, at one of our
meetings, a note from some magazine,
which stated that a sealed copy of a new
translation of Campanella's Sonnets, pub-
lished by the Grolier Club, had been
sold for three hundred dollars. This
impressed the members greatly. It was
a novel idea. A new work might thus
be enshrined in a sort of holy of holies,
which, if the collector so desired, could
be forever sacred from the profanation
of any vulgar or unappreciative eye. The
possessor of such a treasure could en-
joy it by the eye of imagination, having
at the same time the exaltation of grasp-
ing what was for others the unattainable.
The literary committee were so impressed
with this idea that they presented it
to Baxter in regard to the Procrustes.
Baxter making no objection, the sub-
scribers who might wish their copies de-
livered sealed were directed to notify the
author. I sent in my name. A fine
book, after all, was an investment, and
if there was any way of enhancing its
rarity, and therefore its value, I was quite
willing to enjoy such an advantage.
When the Procrustes was ready for
distribution, each subscriber received his
copy by mail, in a neat pasteboard box.
Each number was wrapped in a thin
and transparent but very strong paper,
through which the cover design and tool-
ing were clearly visible. The number
of the copy was indorsed upon the wrap-
per, the folds of which were securely
fastened at each end with sealing-wax,
upon which was impressed, as a guaranty
of its inviolateness, the monogram of the
club.
At the next meeting of the Bodleian
a great deal was said about the Procrus-
tes, and it was unanimously agreed that
no finer specimen of bookmaking had
ever been published by the club. By a
curious coincidence, no one had brought
his copy with him, and the two club
copies had not yet been received from
the binder, who, Baxter had reported,
was retaining them- for some extra fine
work. Upon resolution, offered by a
member who had not subscribed for the
volume, a committee of three was ap-
pointed to review the Procrustes at the
next literary meeting of the club. Of
this committee it was my doubtful for-
tune to constitute one.
In pursuance of my duty in the pre-
mises, it of course became necessary for
me to read the Procrustes. In all prob-
ability I should have cut my own copy
for this purpose, had not one of the club
auctions intervened between my appoint-
ment and the date set for the discussion
of the Procrustes. At this meeting a
copy of the book, still sealed, was offered
for sale, and bought by a non-subscriber
for the unprecedented price of one hun-
dred and fifty dollars. After this a pro-
per regard for my own interests would
not permit me to spoil my copy by open-
ing it, and I was therefore compelled to
procure my information concerning the
Baxter's Procrustes.
827
poein from some other source. As I
had no desire to appear mercenary, I
said nothing about my own copy, and
made no attempt to borrow. I did, how-
ever, casually remark to Baxter that I
should like to look at his copy of the
proof sheets, since I wished to make some
extended quotations for my review, and
would rather not trust my copy to a typ-
ist for that purpose. Baxter assured
me, with every evidence of regret, that
he had considered them of so little im-
portance that he had thrown them into
the fire. This indifference of Baxter to
literary values struck me as just a little
overdone. The proof sheets of Hamlet,
corrected in Shakespeare's own hand,
would be well-nigh priceless.
At the next meeting of the club I ob-
served that Thompson and Davis, who
were with me on the reviewing commit-
tee, very soon brought up the question
of the Procrustes in conversation in the
smoking-room, and seemed anxious to
get from the members their views con-
cerning Baxter's production, I supposed
upon the theory that the appreciation of
any book review would depend more or
less upon the degree to which it reflected
the opinion of those to whom the review
should be presented. I presumed, of
course, that Thompson and Davis had
each read the book, — they were among
the subscribers, — and I was desirous of
getting their point of view.
" What do you think," I inquired, " of
the passage on Social Systems ? " I
have forgotten to say that the poem was
in blank verse, and divided into parts,
each with an appropriate title.
" Well," replied Davis, it seemed to
me a little cautiously, " it is not exactly
Spencerian, although it squints at the
Spencerian view, with a slight deflection
toward Hegelianism. I should consider
it an harmonious fusion of the best views
of all the modern philosophers, with a
strong Baxterian flavor."
" Yes," said Thompson, " the charm of
the chapter lies in this very quality. The
style is an emanation from Baxter's own
intellect, — he has written himself into
the poem. By knowing Baxter we are
able to appreciate the book, and after hav-
ing read the book we feel that we are
so much the more intimately acquainted
with Baxter, — the real Baxter."
Baxter had come in during this collo-
quy, and was standing by the fireplace
smoking a pipe. I was not exactly sure
whether the faint smile which marked
his face was a token of pleasure or cyni-
cism ; it was Baxterian, however, and I
had already learned that Baxter's opin-
ions upon any subject were not to be
gathered always from his facial expres-
sion. For instance, when the club por-
ter's crippled child died Baxter re-
marked, it seemed to me unfeelingly, that
the poor little devil was doubtless better
off, and that the porter himself had cer-
tainly been relieved of a burden ; and
only a week later the porter told me in
confidence that Baxter had paid for an
expensive operation, undertaken in the
hope of prolonging the child's life. I
therefore drew no conclusions from Bax-
ter's somewhat enigmatical smile. He
left the room at this point in the con-
versation, somewhat to my relief.
" By the way, Jones," said Davis, ad-
dressing me, " are you impressed by
Baxter's views on Degeneration ? "
Having often heard Baxter express
himself upon the general downward ten-
dency of modern civilization, I felt safe
in discussing his views in a broad and
general manner.
" I think," I replied, " that they are
in harmony with those of Schopenhauer,
without his bitterness ; with those of Nor-
dau, without his flippancy. His materi-
alism is Haeckel's, presented with some-
thing of the charm of Omar Khayya'm."
" Yes," chimed in Davis, " it answers
the strenuous demand of our day, — dis-
satisfaction with an unjustified optimism,
— and voices for us the courage of hu-
man philosophy facing the unknown."
I had a vague recollection of having
828
Baxter's Procrustes.
read something like this somewhere, but
so much has been written, that one can
scarcely discuss any subject of impor-
tance without unconsciously borrowing,
now and then, the thoughts or the lan-
guage of others. Quotation, like imita-
tion, is a superior grade of flattery.
" The Procrustes," said Thompson, to
whom the metrical review had been ap-
portioned, " is couched in sonorous lines,
of haunting melody and charm ; and yet
so closely inter-related as to be scarcely
quotable with justice to the author. To
be appreciated the poem should be read
as a whole, — I shall say as much in my
review. What shall you say of the let-
ter-press ? " he concluded, addressing me.
I was supposed to discuss the technical
excellence of the volume from the con-
noisseur's viewpoint.
" The setting," I replied judicially,
" is worthy of the gem. The dark green
cover, elaborately tooled, the old English
lettering, the heavy linen paper, mark
this as one of our very choicest publica-
tions. The letter-press is of course De
Vinne's best, — there is nothing better
on this side of the Atlantic. The text is
a beautiful, slender stream, meandering
gracefully through a wide meadow of
margin."
For some reason I left the room for a
minute. As I stepped into the hall, I
almost ran into Baxter, who was stand-
ing near the door, facing a hunting print
of a somewhat humorous character, hung
upon the wall, and smiling with an im-
mensely pleased expression.
" What a ridiculous scene ! " he re-
marked. " Look at that fat old squire
on that tall hunter ! I '11 wager dollars
to doughnuts that he won't get over the
first fence ! "
It was a very good bluff, but did not
deceive me. Under his mask of uncon-
cern, Baxter was anxious to learn what
we thought of his poem, and had sta-
tioned himself in the hall that he might
overhear our discussion without embar-
rassing us by his presence. He had cov-
ered up his delight at our appreciation
by this simulated interest in the hunting
print.
When the night came for the review
of the Procrustes there was a large at-
tendance of members, and several visi-
tors, among them a young English cousin
of one of the members, on his first visit
to the United States ; some of us had met
him at other clubs, and in society, and
had found him a very jolly boy, with
a youthful exuberance of spirits and a
naive ignorance of things American, that
made his views refreshing and, at times,
amusing.
The critical essays were well consid-
ered, if a trifle vague. Baxter received
credit for poetic skill of a high order.
" Our brother Baxter," said Thomp-
son, " should no longer bury his talent
in a napkin. This gem, of course, be-
longs to the club, but the same brain from
which issued this exquisite emanation can
produce others to inspire and charm an
appreciative world."
"The author's view of life," said Davis,
" as expressed in these beautiful lines,
will help us to fit our shoulders for the
heavy burden of life, by bringing to our
realization those profound truths of phi-
losophy which find hope in despair and
pleasure in pain. When he shall see fit
to give to the wider world, in fuller form,
the thoughts of which we have been
vouchsafed this foretaste, let us hope
that some little ray of his fame may rest
upon the Bodleian, from which can never
be taken away the proud privilege of
saying that he was one of its members."
I then pointed out the beauties of the
volume as a piece of bookmaking. I
knew, from conversation with the publi-
cation committee, the style of type and
rubrication, and could see the cover
through the wrapper of my sealed copy.
The dark green morocco, I said, in sum-
ming up, typified the author's serious
view of life, as a thing to be endured as
patiently as might be. The cap-and-bells
Baxter's Procrustes.
829
border was significant of the shams by
which the optimist sought to delude him-
self into the view that life was a desirable
thing. The intricate blind-tooling of the
doublure shadowed forth the blind fate
which left us in ignorance of our future
and our past, or of even what the day it-
self might bring forth. The black-letter
type, with rubricated initials, signified a
philosophic pessimism enlightened by the
conviction that in duty one might find,
after all, an excuse for life and a hope
for humanity. Applying this test to the
club, this work, which might be said to
represent all that the Bodleian stood
for, was in itself sufficient to justify the
club's existence. If the Bodleian had
done nothing else, if it should do nothing
more, it had produced a masterpiece.
There was a sealed copy of the Pro-
crustes, belonging, I believe, to one of
the committee, lying on the table by
which I stood, and I had picked it up
and held it in my hand for a moment,
to emphasize one of my periods, but had
laid it down immediately. I noted, as
I sat down, that young Hunkin, our
English visitor, who sat on the other
side of the table, had picked up the vol-
ume and was examining it with interest.
When the last review was read, and the
generous applause had subsided, there
were cries for Baxter.
" Baxter ! Baxter ! Author ! Author ! "
Baxter had been sitting over in a cor-
ner during the reading of the reviews,
and had succeeded remarkably well, it
seemed to me, in concealing, under his
mask of cynical indifference, the exulta-
tion which I was sure he must feel. But
this outburst of enthusiasm was too much
even for Baxter, and it was clear that
he was struggling with strong emotion
when he rose to speak.
" Gentlemen, and fellow members of
the Bodleian, it gives me unaffected
pleasure — sincere pleasure — some day
you may know how much pleasure — I
cannot trust myself to say it now — to
see the evident care with which your
committee have read my poor verses,
and the responsive sympathy with which
my friends have entered into my views
of life and conduct. I thank you again,
and again, and when I say that I am too
full for utterance, — I 'm sure you will
excuse me from saying any more."
Baxter took his seat, and the applause
had begun again when it was broken by
a sudden exclamation.
" By Jove ! " exclaimed our English
visitor, who still sat behind the table,
" what an extraordinary book ! "
Every one gathered around him.
" You see," he exclaimed, holding up
the volume, "you fellows said so much
about the bally book that I wanted to
see what it was like ; so I untied the rib-
bon, and cut the leaves with the paper
knife lying here, and found — and found
that there was n't a single line in it,
don't you know ! "
Blank consternation followed this an-
nouncement, which proved only too true.
Every one knew instinctively, without
further investigation, that the club had
been badly sold. In the resulting con-
fusion Baxter escaped, but later was
waited upon by a committee, to whom
he made the rather lame excuse that he
had always regarded uncut and sealed
books as tommy-rot, and that he had
merely been curious to see how far the
thing could go ; and that the result had
justified his belief that a book with no-
thing in it was just as useful to a book-
collector as one embodying a work of
genius. He offered to pay all the bills
for the sham Procrustes, or to replace
the blank copies with the real thing, as
we might choose. Of course, after such
an insult, the club did not care for the
poem. He was permitted to pay the ex-
pense, however, and it was more than
hinted to him that his resignation from
the club would be favorably acted upon.
He never sent it in, and, as he went to
Europe shortly afterwards, the affair had
time to blow over.
In our first disgust at Baxter's dupli-
830
The Quiet Man.
city, most of us cut our copies of the Pro-
crustes, some of us mailed them to Bax-
ter with cutting notes, and others threw
them into the fire. A few wiser spirits
held on to theirs, and this fact leaking
out, it began to dawn upon the minds of
the real collectors among us that the
volume was something unique in the way
of a publication.
"Baxter," said our president one
evening to a select few of us who sat
around the fireplace, " was wiser than
we knew, or than he perhaps appreciated.
His Procrustes, from the collector's point
of view, is entirely logical, and might be
considered as the acme of bookmaking.
To the true collector, a book is a work
of art, of which the contents are no more
important than the words of an opera.
Fine binding is a desideratum, and, for
its cost, that of the Procrustes could not
be improved upon. The paper is above
criticism. The true collector loves wide
margins, and the Procrustes, being all
margin, merely touches the vanishing
point of the perspective. The smaller the
edition, the greater the collector's eager-
ness to acquire a copy. There are but six
uncut copies left, I am told, of the Pro-
crustes, and three sealed copies, of one
of which I am the fortunate possessor."
After this deliverance, it is not sur-
prising that, at our next auction, a sealed
copy of Baxter's Procrustes was knocked
down, after spirited bidding, for two
hundred and fifty dollars, the highest
price ever brought by a single volume
published by the club.
Charles W. Chesnutt.
THE QUIET MAN.
AT college it was always easy to
create a prepossession in favor of a
man by recommending him as a "nice,
quiet sort of fellow." In the case of
the athlete who had demonstrated his
vitality and manly qualities, the rea-
son for this prepossession was clear;
the declaration of his friends was an
assurance that his head had not been
turned by his achievements, and that
he was modest and unassertive. But
it always seemed to me singular that
so negative a statement should so gen-
erally have guaranteed the worth of
one of whom little else was known.
Even in the larger world outside of
college, the same guarantee holds good ;
let a stranger in a city have but one
friend who makes it known that he is
a "nice, quiet sort of fellow," and he
will not lack for a welcome.
Yet many of the primary and obvi-
ous reasons for quietness in a man are
not prepossessing. It may be that he
is a weakling; bullied because of his
lack of strength in the Spartan age of
boyhood, he has had fixed upon him
the habit of timidity and self-efface-
ment. Or he may be stupid, yet with
just enough intelligence to perceive his
dullness and so to be dumb. Or he
may by nature be one of those passion-
less, unenthusiastic, indifferent crea-
tures who find sufficient occupation in
buttoning on their clothes in the morn-
ing and unbuttoning them at night,
eating their three meals, and going
through the daily routine work or rou-
tine idleness to which necessity or cir-
cumstance has accustomed them. The
classification is incomplete; there are
quiet men who are not weaklings, who
are not stupid, who are enthusiastic,
men of firm will and steadfast purpose.
But if we pass over these for the pre-
sent, it will appear that the self-con-
trol practiced by quiet persons had
oftentimes better give place to self-
The Quiet Man.
831
abandon, and that many a man is re-
spected for his restraint when he should
be pitied for his diffidence. There is,
for instance, the case of one whose
quiet ways have resulted from a sense
of physical inferiority in boyhood.
No matter what victories may be
attained in the development of charac-
ter, the point of view and the manner
that were fixed in the early formative
years are never quite discarded. The
boy who has less strength than his fel-
lows, less athletic skill, and yet ad-
mires and longs for these possessions,
invites only too often demonstrations
upon himself of the vigor and prowess
that he covets. A boy likes above all
things to show his power over another
boy; and the most instant method is
by putting him down and sitting on
him, or by seizing his wrist and twist-
ing it till he howls, or by gripping the
back of his neck and forcing him to
march whither the tyrant wills. Once
the unlucky weakling is discovered and
his susceptibility to teasing exposed,
he becomes the plaything of his stronger
mates. The amusement is the greater
if he resents it with spirit, the keener
if he has a sensitiveness which is hurt
by the abuse, the more frequently in-
vited if he has the fatal admiration
for deeds of strength, and haunts, in
spite of its terrors, the society of those
who can perform them. His spirit is
not crushed, but it learns discretion;
his sensitiveness grows into a shy and
morbid pride ; he likes to look on at
better men, and to know them, but he
finds it wise to be inconspicuous, inas-
much as to draw attention to himself
usually means to suffer from a display
of the very abilities which he admires.
And out of this what results? He
acquires the habit of looking on and
being socially inconspicuous. He may
have energies that in the end win for
him eminence, but he will probably be
to the end a shy and quiet man. It
is not necessary that a boy should be
a weakling to arrive at this develop-
ment ; some trifling peculiarity, a cu-
rious quality of voice, or a nervous
and easily mimicked laugh, or an alien
accent may suffice to create in him an
undue tendency to hold his tongue. I
know one man who attributes his
" cursed quietness " to an ailment of
the throat that he had when a boy, and
that made his speech husky and often
liable to break down. Another thinks
he is quiet because he never could sing ;
nearly always, in any gathering in
which he found himself, there was
singing, and he, utterly without the
musical sense, sat and contributed no-
thing. This inability in expression
extended even to his speech ; he could
not manage his voice to tell a story
effectively, and though no one has a
keener appreciation of the humorous or
dramatic, no one is less able than he
to realize it in his talk.
Then there are the humble-minded
people who fancy themselves too dull or
too uninformed to be interesting, and
who cut themselves off from sharing
freely with others their thoughts and
opinions. Often they do themselves
scant justice in their modesty, and win
all the more on that account the regard
of the few who come near enough to
know them. But they are always un-
derstood of but few, and they are bot-
tled-up people, a nervous, self -conscious,
timorous folk, of pleasant dispositions
and much sentiment, who seldom cut
any large figure in the world.
The others, who really are dull and
without being oppressed by the know-
ledge preserve a befitting retirement,
constitute perhaps a majority of the
quiet men. To be dull is certainly
not to be disliked ; and yet I question
if any one of this numerous, agreeable,
and necessary company quite fills out
the original mental picture summoned
by the recommendation, — "a nice,
quiet sort of fellow." For the phrase
suggests a man who has reserves of
thought or knowledge or moral force.
Indeed, we often follow up the desig'
832
The Quiet Man.
nation, as thus: "A nice, quiet sort of
fellow, with a lot to him." On closer
acquaintance, we are likely to find that
his quietness proceeds from lack of
strong convictions rather than from
moral force, or from mere empty-
headedness rather than from thoughts
too deep to share. We come to think
him a man with a receptive habit but
little assimilative power. He listens
but does not learn. It seems to be a
sort of mental and moral dyspepsia
from which he suffers.
Let us suppose, however, that it is
neither lack of ideas nor ill digestion
of ideas which renders him a quiet
man, but that he is indeed a person
"with a lot to him." Then, usually,
he is the man of one idea. It is rare
that he has versatility. He is the
small inventor or the mechanician,
whose mind on being diverted from
the study of wheels and cogs can in
no other sense be diverted; it is cold
alike to Shakespeare and to baseball.
He is the young poet of good impulses
and a little talent, toying with his
lyric and indifferent to the science of
the stars, of the green and growing
things about him, and to the business
and endeavors of his active fellow
men. He is the lawyer who makes a
career out of ingenuity in splitting
hairs ; he is the business man who car-
ries his ledgers home with him at
night; he is any man who, by his de-
votion to an abstract principle or prob-
lem, or to a material fact, neglects his
relations with nature and with men.
If the principle is important and ap-
peals to a missionary and reforming
conscience, and if the man has power,
he is not admitted to fellowship among
the quiet, but according to one's point
of view is hailed as a hero or denounced
as a crank, a nuisance, or a fool.
Of the many small people involved
in their struggle with one idea, and
abandoned to their solitary interest,
Emerson has supplied a phrase that
may be appropriated for definition.
They are Mere Thinkers, as contrasted
with Man Thinking. In them the hu-
man element is deficient. They may
have an absorbed interest in their one
pursuit, perhaps even a kind of dry
and laudable enthusiasm ; in their nar-
row range their souls may have conflicts
with the devil and issue worthily; but
they are not the men of rich and gen-
erous nature, whose ideas take form
in action, and who in action strike out
fresh ideas. Man Thinking is man
alert, versatile, living, — which is to
say, finding constantly new interest in
the things and beings about him, and
developing himself more and more by
the contact. From the ranks of Man
Thinking emerge most of the strong
and virile, the men of burly laughter,
observing and remembering eye, and
careless, wide - ranging talk ; the un-
hoarded, chance - flung anecdote, the
unconsciously graphic phrase, the crisp
expression of a truth shrewdly seen
drop from the lips of Man Thinking,
not from those of Mere Thinker. One
Mere Thinker in a million may some
time evolve by mathematical and intel-
lectual processes a machine of more
than mathematical, even of human
value ; yet even then it is Man Think-
ing who will perfect it, and manufacture
it, and advertise it, and sell it, and
secure to the world at large — and
to Man Thinking in particular — its
benefits. So Man Thinking is never
quiet; he is bustling, urging, cajoling,
threatening, flinging his arms about, or
battering with heavy, hostile fists ; and
in his leisure moments pouring out
prodigally, for whoever may pass, his
amazed or delighted or pained impres-
sions, — just like an earnest, excited
child.
And meanwhile the quiet man, —
Mere Thinker. Hear Emerson: "Meek
young men grow up in libraries, be-
lieving it their duty to accept the views
which Cicero, which Locke, which Ba-
con have given, forgetful that Cicero,
Locke, and Bacon were only young men
The Quiet Man.
833
in libraries when they wrote these books.
Hence, instead of Man Thinking, we
have the bookworm. Hence, the book-
learned class, who value books as such.
. . . Hence, the restorers of readings,
the emendators, the bibliomaniacs of
all degrees."
The narrowness and inertia of the
quiet man are frequently moral as well
as mental. He is firm on the point of
certain things which he will not do,
but his virtue is too likely to be of
this negative quality; and while his
noisy and active brother is blundering
about, learning what life is, perhaps
heaping up sins and offenses, yet also
building himself in his heedless, casual
way monuments of good, Mere Thinker,
with eyes upon the ground, treads the
barren path of the dull precisian. Since
he is quiet, he receives credit for vir-
tues if he does not exhibit boldly their
antithetic vices. Loyalty and stead-
fastness and a good domestic nature
are the excellent qualities most often
attributed to him. Yet as to the first
of these, can any one doubt the truth
of Stevenson's words: "A man may
have sat in a room for hours and not
opened his teeth, and yet come out of
that room a disloyal friend or a vile
calumniator " ? The quiet friend may
be as faithful as the vociferous, but
there should be no presumption in his
favor, for his very habit of life is in-
sidious, and tends to breed the germs
of doubt if not disloyalty. The look-
er-on is usually the man dissatisfied
with idleness and critical of the activ-
ity of others. Because it might draw
upon him comparison to his disadvan-
tage, he does not utter freely his carp-
ing criticism of the active; but he
bears in mind h.ow much better he
himself would do this or that if it
were not for some forbidding circum-
stance. And this habit of comparing
himself with others, which is one of
the common recreations of the quiet
man, sometimes, no doubt, begets the
envy which makes it easy to betray.
VOL. xcin. — NO. 560. 53
Even his unquestioned domesticity
may not be so comprehensive a virtue.
To support some one besides himself in
decency and honor is not all that a
man should strive to do, though it is
much. He should also feel the obli-
gation to bring gayety into the lives of
those whom he loves. It is possible
for some men by sheer earning power
to provide their families with oppor-
tunities for travel and amusement and
adventure. But the earning pov/er of
the majority is limited in these mat-
ters ; and all the more is it necessary
then for the man to bring variety and
a cheerful activity and liveliness into
his house. The fact that the routine
of the day has been dull does not ex-
cuse him for being glum and silent at
his evening meal. And too much of
the quietness in the world is but the
habit of a listless and brooding selfish-
ness.
It would be wanton to make these ex-
posures and not offer a remedy. Here
is a suggestion for the quiet man:
"Learn to make a noise."
It is not enough that he should cele-
brate the Fourth of July each year in
the customary manner, — though he
may find even that barbarous observ-
ance beneficial. Taking an active part
in the romps and play of children is a
resource that if open to him he should
embrace. Probably he has so schooled
himself to inexpressiveness that he can-
not at once emerge out of the second-
ary place into which he is relegated at
social gatherings; but three or four
times a year he should, at whatever
cost of courage, insist upon being heard.
The advice to make a noise need not
be taken literally, — though such in-
terpretation would lead few quiet men
into serious error. It may serve the
purpose if the man develops a strong
outdoor enthusiasm, or a keen spirit of
rivalry in games, for either of these
will introduce into his existence that
element of life that he most needs. If
he can acquire some undignified accom-
834
The Quiet Man.
plishment, — if he can learn to sing a
"coon song, " or to play upon the mouth
organ, or to dance a clog, or to recite
"Casey at the Bat," — he will have
made an advance in the art of living
such as none but a constitutionally shy
and quiet person can understand. Per-
haps, with the best will in the world,
he can attain to none of these things ;
he may then find a means of grace in
the occasional revels and merry-makings
that are not denied even the most quiet.
Failing all else, and being quite out of
conceit with himself, let him go tramp-
ing in search of adventure, — in the
city by-streets at night, or through the
countryside. But there, again, does the
quiet man become aware of his misfor-
tune ; adventure evades him ; and while
his assertive, unappreciative brother, on
going down town in the morning, may
have a romantic encounter with a run-
away automobile occupied by a beauti-
ful lady, or with a tiger strayed from
a circus, he may roam the world and
meet with no runaway automobile, no
tiger, and, alas and alack! no beauti-
ful lady. Even so, let him persevere ;
preparing himself for adventure, he
may almost attain the habit of mind
of the adventurous.
But never, I fear, will he fully at-
tain it. There will always be the hor-
rid, harassing doubt — never shared by
the truly adventurous — as to whether
he would, indeed, bear himself heroic-
ally. To illustrate the point, I must
make a confession ; I am a quiet man.
Although I have often prepared myself
in mind, I have not yet set out upon
my quest of adventure. But no longer
ago than yesterday, one of my direct,
unquestioning friends plunged into it;
and ever since I have been miserably
torn with inquiry as to whether in his
place I should have been so prompt.
Kid ing on his bicycle along a village
street, he was aware that a wagon over-
took and passed him at unusual speed,
but he thought nothing of this. He had
dismounted, and was entering a gate-
way when he heard a great hubbub be-
hind him ; and looking round he saw
men running, with cries of " Stop him !
Stop him ! " and in front of them a man
speeding along on a bicycle. My friend
stepped out into the street and opposed
a threatening front; still the fleeing
rider came on. And then, just as he
was about to whiz by, my friend hurled
his bicycle into the rider's path; the
two machines went down with a crash,
and the hero flung himself valiantly upon
the groaning wretch, who lay crumpled
amid the wreckage. "I 've got him ! "
cried the hero to the breathless, gather-
ing throng. " Got him ! " they an-
swered, with here and there a sneering
accent of profanity. "We yelled at
you to stop the fellow in the wagon."
"Yes, the fellow I was chasing, " added
the unfortunate captive. And, indeed,
it appeared that the driver was the
miscreant, having knocked down a wo-
man and made off; and the bicyclist
had merely been one of a humane and
inquisitive mob.
Now, my agitating question has
been, Should I, too, thus boldly, per-
emptorily, and efficiently have hurled
my bicycle? For the life of me I
cannot tell. So many reasons why I
might have done so occur to me, and
then again so many considerations
which might have stayed my hand. A
fleeing criminal — one's public duty
— and yet on such uncertain grounds
— to wreck him so utterly, to damage
him perhaps so irreparably ! All I am
sure of is that I should have opposed
a threatening front.
And this, I imagine, is the chief
affliction, the shame of many a quiet
man, — the dread of finding in some
important moment that the reflective
habit has produced paralysis. Even if
he breaks through the net of qualifying
considerations and acts efficiently, he
has the humiliated feeling that he has
made a great mental to-do over a mat-
ter that some one else would have gone
about without debate. Moreover, he
The Quiet Man,
835
shrinks from using his faculties in un-
conventional ways ; again I must serve
as corpus vile for purposes of illustra-
tion. A man who had been my guest
overnight decided the next morning,
which happened to be Sunday, that he
desired a cab. From the back win-
dow of my lodgings, which are on the
fourth floor of the house, he descried
a livery stable, and opening the win-
dow he shouted lustily in the Sabbath
stillness the name of the proprietor.
Now, although we have in our rear a
livery stable, our neighborhood is prim
and even fastidious ; the houses in our
block are occupied by families with
highly conventional notions of propri-
ety. In some dismay I pulled my
guest's coat tails, whispering that I
would send out for a cab; withdraw-
ing his head for a moment, he replied,
" This is quicker, " and then again
thrusting it forth, continued to bawl.
At last a stable boy answered him ; he
gave his order, specifying the number
of the house with painful distinctness ;
after which he turned to me and com-
plimented me on the convenience of
my situation and the needlessness of
a jingling telephone. In my scheme
of life, a cab is the last of all extrava-
gances; yet even if it were not, or if
I had found myself in the direst need
of one, I am sure it would never have
occurred to me to employ this simple,
primitive method of securing it. Quiet-
ness tends to unfit one for the use of
rudimentary instruments.
It is time, after these frank confes-
sions, to rehearse some merits of the
quiet man, and particularly to dwell
upon the admirable qualities of some
quiet men. It is hardly necessary to
summon up here the kindly and per-
haps not more than three-quarters fal-
lacious banality about the constant need
of good listeners. We must persuade
ourselves of some less negative excuse
for our existence. I dismiss from con-
sideration also the splendid quiet hero
of romance, the Imperturbable ; when-
ever I have discovered an air of the
imperturbable in a man, I have also
discovered an offensive self-compla-
cency, and I am unable to do justice
to this particular flower of the species.
Perhaps the most worthy office that
the quiet man performs is that of the
comforter, or at least the sympathetic
confidant of grief. He who is stricken
in spirit, and must utter his sorrow,
turns less readily to the exuberant than
to the silent friend, whose speech is
apter with eyes than with lips. It
matters not very much if such a man
has the weaknesses that must so often
be imputed; let him be but a true
friend and a quiet one, and the sore in
heart will take some comfort in him.
If he has not the weaknesses, but is
stanch and strong, a walk with him in
the open air, whether in the biting winds
of March or over the sunlit fields of
May, or a talk with him before the win-
ter fire, may put vigor, as well as the
first sense of peace, into the soul.
As such a friend is a resource in
time of sadness, so, on happier occa-
sions, he need never be a kill-joy.
No merriment was ever stifled because
one of those bidden to share it could
contribute nothing but appreciation.
That quality the quiet man must have.
It is the noisy or the active one who,
even while giving life to happy gather-
ings, is most dangerous. Some blurt-
ed truth, some reckless jest, some too
searching inquiry, or too downright,
blunt debate, may strike dead the gay
laughter, and transform cheerful, open-
hearted contentment into a suffering
desire to escape. Quiet men may
rarely be charged with breaches of
tact, careless and inconsiderate speech,
the little slights that gall the sensitive,
the little failures to be diplomatic
where diplomacy were honest as well
as kind. Quiet men are not the busy-
bodies ; quiet men were not, I am con-
vinced, the comforters of Job.
And the best of them are deserving
of nearly the best that we can say.
836
Indianapolis : a City of Homes.
Not quite the best; one can hardly be-
lieve that the great Elizabethans, for in-
stance, were quiet men. But out of our
own acquaintance let us pick the few
who, without an impressive show of en-
ergy and activity, perform in the most
truly workmanlike way work that they
seem willing to let pass unnoticed. They
do not spend a great portion of their
lives in efforts to attract attention to
their achievements, to their skill; they
do not despise popular appreciation, but
they find the courting of it unimpor-
tant and unworthy ; therefore they move
upon the performance of their tasks,
unfretful if they are neglected, keep-
ing to themselves the trials and per-
plexities that they encounter, patiently
overcoming and accomplishing. They
may not win so many or so varied ex-
periences and gifts from life as the
reckless and ranging adventurer ; theirs
is not often the genius that builds the
greatest and most enduring monuments ;
yet nearly all that has the charm of fine
and perfect workmanship, nearly all that
is subtly and beautifully conceived and
exquisitely wrought, in manufactures,
in machinery, in painting and music and
literature, bears testimony to the serene
vision, the unremitting toil of the quiet
man.
Arthur Stanwood Pier.
INDIANAPOLIS: A CITY OF HOMES.
THE Hoosier is not so deeply wounded
by the assumption in Eastern quarters
that he is a wild man of the woods, as
by the amiable condescension of acquain-
tances at the seaboard, who tell him, when
he mildly remonstrates, that his abnormal
sensitiveness is provincial. This is, in-
deed, the hardest lot, to be called a mud-
sill and then rebuked for talking back !
There are, however, several special insults
to which the citizen of Indianapolis is sub-
jected, and these he resents with all the
strength of his being. First among them
is the proneness of many to confuse
Indianapolis and Minneapolis. To the
citizen of the Hoosier capital Minneapo-
lis seems a remote place, that can be
reached only by passing through Chicago.
Still another source of intense annoyance
is the persistent fallacy that Indianapolis
is situated on the Wabash River. There
seems to be something funny about the
name of this pleasant stream, which a
large percentage of the people of Indian-
apolis have never seen, unless from the car
window. East of Pittsburg the wanderer
from Hoosier land expects to be asked
how things are on the Way-bosh, — a
pronunciation which, by the way, is never
heard at home. Still another grievance
that has embittered the lives of Indian-
apolitans is the annoying mispronuncia-
tion of the name of the town by benighted
outsiders. Rural Hoosiers, in fact, offend
the ears of their city cousins with Indi-
anopolis ; but it is left usually for the
Yankee visitor to say Injunapolis, with a
stress on Injun which points rather un-
necessarily to the day of the war-whoop
and scalp dance.
Indianapolis — like Jerusalem, " a city
at unity with itself, " where the tribes as-
semble, and where the seat of judgment
is established — is in every sense the capi-
tal of all the Hoosiers. With the excep-
tion of Boston and Providence, it is the
largest state capital in the country ; and
no other American city without water
communication is as large. It is dis-
tinguished primarily by the essentially
American character of its people. The
total foreign-born population of Indian-
apolis at the last census was only 17,000 ;
whereas Hartford, which is only half the
Indianapolis : a City of Homes.
837
size of Indianapolis, returned 23,000,
Rochester, with 7000 fewer people, re-
turned 40,000 ; and Worcester, in a
total of 118,000, reported 37,000 as
foreign-born. A considerable body of
Germans and German-Americans have
contributed much to the making of the
city ; but the town has been passed over
by the Swedes, Poles, and Bohemians that
are to be reckoned with in many Amer-
ican cities. There are, however, 5000
negro voters in the city. Indianapolis
is marked again by the stability of its
population. A large percentage of the
householders own their homes ; and a
substantial body of labor is thus assured
to the community.
Indiana was admitted as a state in
1816, and the General Assembly, sitting
at Corydon in 1821, designated Indian-
apolis, then a settlement of straggling
cabins, as the state capital. The name
of the new town was not adopted without
a struggle, Tecumseh, Suwarro, and Con-
cord being proposed and supported, while
the name finally chosen was opposed for
reasons not wholly academic. It is of
record that the first mention of the name
Indianapolis in the legislature caused
great merriment. The town was laid out
in broad streets, which were quickly
adorned with shade trees that are an
abiding testimony to the foresight of the
founders. Alexander Ralston, one of
the engineers employed in the first sur-
vey, had served in a similar capacity at
Washington, and the diagonal avenues,
the generous breadth of the streets, and
the circular plaza at the monument are
suggestive of the national capital. The
urban landscape lacks variety : the town
is perfectly flat, and in old times the mud
was intolerable, but the trees are a con-
tinuing glory.
Central Indiana was not, in 1820, when
the first cabin was built, a region of un-
alloyed delight. The land was rich, but
it was covered with heavy woods, and
much of it was under water. Indians
still roamed the forests, and the builder
of the first cabin was killed by them.
There were no roads, and White River,
on whose eastern shore the town was
built, was navigable only by the smallest
craft. Mrs. Beecher, in From Dawn to
Daylight, described the region as it ap-
peared in the forties : " It is a level stretch
of land as far as the eye can reach, look-
ing as if one good, thorough rain would
transform it into an impassable morass.
How the inhabitants contrive to get about
in rainy weather, I can't imagine, unless
they use stilts. The city itself has been
redeemed from this slough, and presents
quite a thriving appearance, being very
prettily laid out, with a number of fine
buildings." Dr. Eggleston, writing in
his novel Roxy of the same period, lays
stress on the saffron hue of the commu-
nity, the yellow mud seeming to cover
all things animate and inanimate.
But the founders possessed faith, cour-
age, and hardihood. Too great stress can.
not be laid on their work. They sacri-
ficed personal ambition for the good of
the community. Their patriotism even
was touched with the zeal of their reli-
gion. For many years before the civil
war a parade of the Sunday-school chil-
dren of the city was the chief feature of
every Fourth of July celebration. The
founders appreciated their opportunity,
and labored from the first in the interest
of morality and enlightenment. The
young capital was a converging point for a
slender stream of population that bore in
from New England, and a broader cur-
rent that swept westward from the Middle
and Southeastern states. There was no
sectional feeling in those days. Many
of the prominent settlers from Kentucky
were Whigs, but a newcomer's church
affiliation was of far more importance
than his political belief. Indianapolis
was charged in later years with a lack of
public spirit, but with reference only to
commercial matters. There has never
been a time when a hearing could not
be had for any undertaking of philan-
thropy or public education.
838
Indianapolis : a City of Homes.
The effect of the civil war upon In-
dianapolis was immediate and far-reach-
ing. It emphasized through the central-
izing there of the state's military energy
the fact that it was the capital city, —
a fact which until that time had been
accepted languidly by the average Hoo-
sier countryman. The presence within
the state of an aggressive body of sym-
pathizers with Southern ideas directed
attention throughout the country to the
energy and resourcefulness of Morton,
the war governor, who pursued the
Hoosier Copperheads relentlessly, while
raising a great army to send to the seat
of war. Again, the intense political
bitterness engendered by the war did not
end with peace, or with the restoration
of good feeling in neighboring states,
but continued for twenty-five years more
to be a source of political, and, markedly
at Indianapolis, a cause of social irrita-
tion. In the minds of many, a Democrat
was a Copperhead, and a Copperhead
was an evil and odious thing. Refer-
ring to the slow death of this feeling, a
veteran observer of affairs who had,
moreover, supported Mr. Cleveland's
candidacy twice, recently said that he
had never been able wholly to free him-
self from this prejudice. But the end
really came in 1884, with the reaction
against Blaine, which was nowhere more
significant of a growth of independence
than at Indianapolis.
Following the formative period, which
may be said to have ended with the civil
war, came an era of prosperity in busi-
ness, and even of splendor in social
matters. Some handsome habitations
had been built in the ante-bellum days,
but they were at once surpassed by the
homes which many citizens reared for
themselves in the seventies. These re-
main, as a group, the handsomest resi-
dences that have ever been built at any
period in the history of the city. Life
had been earnest in the early days, but
it now became picturesque. The terms
"aristocrats " and "first families " were
heard in the community, and something
of traditional Southern ampleness and
generosity crept into the way of life.
No one said nouveau riche in those days ;
the first families were the real thing.
No one denied it, and misfortune could
not shake or destroy them.
A panic is a great teacher of humility,
and the financial depression that fell upon
the country in 1873 drove the lesson home
remorselessly at Indianapolis. There
had been nothing equivocal about the
boom. Western speculators had not al-
ways had a fifty-year-old town to operate
in, — the capital of a state, a natural rail-
way centre, — no arid village in a hot
prairie, but a real forest city that thun-
dered mightily in the prospectus. There
was no sudden collapse ; a brave effort
was made to ward off the day of reckon-
ing ; but this only prolonged the agony.
Among the victims there was little
whimpering. A thoroughbred has not
proved his mettle until he has held up
his head in defeat, and the Hoosier aris-
tocrat went down with his flag flying.
A young man of this regime was reduced
to accepting employment as a railroad
brakeman, and he bought a silver-
mounted lantern with his first month's
wages. Those that had suffered the
proud man's contumely then came forth
to sneer. An old-fashioned butternut
Democrat remarked of a banker who
failed, that " no wonder Blank busted
when he drove to business in a carriage
behind a nigger in uniform." The
memory of the hard times lingered long
at home and abroad. A town where
credit could be so shaken was not, the
Eastern investor declared, a safe place
for further investments ; and in many
quarters Indianapolis was not forgiven
until an honest, substantial growth had
carried the lines of the city beyond the
terra incognita of the boom.
Many of the striking characteristics
of the people are attributable to those
days, when the city's bounds were moved
far couutryward, to the end that the
Indianapolis : a City of Homes.
839
greatest possible number of investors
might enjoy the ownership of town lots.
The signal effect of this dark time was
to stimulate thrift and bring a new era
of caution and conservatism ; for there
is a good deal of Scotch-Irish in the Hoo-
sier, and he cannot be fooled twice with
the same bait. During the period of
depression the town lost its zest for
gayety. It took its pleasures a little
soberly ; it was notorious as a town that
welcomed theatrical attractions grudg-
ingly, though this attitude must be re-
ferred back also to the religious preju-
dices of the early comers. Your In-
dianapolitan who has personal knowledge
of the panic, or who has listened to the
story of it from one who weathered the
storm, has never forgotten the discipline
of the seventies : though he has reached
the promised land he still remembers the
lash of Pharaoh. So conservatism be-
came the city's rule of life. The panic
of 1893 caused scarcely a ripple, and
the typical Indianapolis business man to
this day is one who minds his barometer
carefully.
Indianapolis was a town that became
a city rather against its will. It liked
its own way, and its way was slow ; but
when the calamity could no longer be
averted, it had its trousers creased and
its shoes polished, and accepted with
good grace the fact that its population
was approximately two hundred thou-
sand, and that it had crept to a place
comfortably near the top in the list of
bank clearances. A man who left In-
dianapolis in 1880, returned in 1900 —
the Indianapolitan, like the cat in the
ballad, always goes back ; he cannot suc-
cessfully be transplanted — to find him-
self a stranger in a strange city. Once
he knew all the people who rode in
chaises ; but on his return he found new
people abroad in smart vehicles ; once
he had been able to converse on topics
of the day with a passing friend in the
middle of Washington Street ; now he
must duck and dive, and keep an eye on
the policeman if he would make a safe
crossing. He was asked to luncheon at
a] club ; in the old days there were no
clubs, or they were looked on as iniqui-
tous things ; he was taken to look at
factories which were the largest of their
kind in the world. At the railroad
yards he saw machinery being loaded
for shipment to Russia and Chili ; he
was told that books published at Indian-
apolis were sold in New York and Bos-
ton, Toronto and London, and he was
driven over asphalt streets to parks that
had not been dreamed of before his term
of exile.
Manufacturing is the great business
of the city. There are nearly two thou-
sand establishments within its limits
where manufacturing in some form is
carried on. Many of these rose in the
day of natural gas, and it was predicted
that when the gas had been exhausted
the city would lose them ; but the num-
ber has increased steadily despite the
failure of the gas supply. There are
abundant coal-fields south and southwest
of the city, so that the question of fuel
will not soon vex manufacturers. The
city enjoys, besides, the benefits to be
derived from the numerous manufacto-
ries in other towns of central Indiana,
many of which maintain administrative
offices there. It is not only a good place
in which to make things, but a point
from which many things may be sold to
advantage. Jobbing flourished before
manufacturing became a serious factor.
The jobbers have given the city an en-
viable reputation for enterprise and fair
dealing. When you ask an Indianapolis
jobber whether the propinquity of St.
Louis, Cincinnati, Chicago, and Cleve-
land is not against him, he answers that
he meets his competitors every day in
many parts of the country and is not
afraid of them.
Indianapolis is not like other cities of
approximately the same size. It is not
the native who says so, but the visitor
from abroad, who is puzzled by a differ-
840
Indianapolis : a City of Homes.
ence between the Hoosier capital and
Kansas City, Omaha, and Denver, or
Minneapolis and St. Paul. It has per-
haps more kinship with Cincinnati than
with any other Western city. Most
Western towns try to catch the step of
Chicago, but Indianapolis has never suf-
fered from any such ambition ; so the
Kansas City man and the Minneapolis
man visit Indianapolis and find it slow,
while the Baltimore or Washington or
Hartford visitor wonders what there is
about the Hoosier capital that reminds
him of his own city.
Indianapolis is a place of industry,
thrift, and comfort, and not of luxury.
Its social entertainments were long of
the simplest sort, and the change in this
respect has come only within a few
years, — with the great wave of growth
and prosperity that has wrought a new
Indianapolis from the old. If left to it-
self, the old Indianapolis would never
have known a horse show or a carnival,
— would never have strewn itself with
confetti ; but the invading time-spirit is
fast destroying the walls of the city of
tradition. Business men no longer go
home to dinner at twelve o'clock and
take a nap before returning to work ;
and the old amiable habit of visiting for
an hour in an office where ten minutes
of business was to be transacted has
passed. A town is at last a city when
sociability has been squeezed out of busi-
ness and appointments are arranged a
day in advance by telephone.
The distinguishing quality of Indian-
apolis is its simple domesticity. The
people are home-loving and home-keep-
ing. In the early days, when the town
was a rude capital in the woods, the peo-
ple stayed at home perforce ; and when
the railroad reached them they did not
take readily to travel. A trip to New
York is still a much more serious event,
considered from Indianapolis, than from
Denver or Kansas City. It was an
Omaha young man who was so little ap-
palled by distance that, having an ex-
press frank, he formed the habit of
sending his laundry work to New York,
to assure a certain finish to his linen that
was unattainable at home. The more
the Hoosier travels, the more he likes his
own town. Only a little while ago an
Indianapolis man who had been in New
York for a week went to the theatre and
saw there a fellow townsman who had
just arrived. He hurried around to
greet him at the end of the first act.
" Tell me," he exclaimed, " how is every-
thing in old Indianapolis ? " This tri-
fling incident is more illuminative of the
characteristic qualities of the Hoosier
capital than many pages of historical
narrative.
The Hoosiers assemble at Indianapo-
lis in great throngs with slight excuse.
In addition to the sixteen railroads that
touch there, newly constructed interur-
ban traction lines have lately knit new
communities into sympathetic relation-
ship with the capital. You may stand
in Washington Street and read the names
of all the surrounding towns on the big
interurban cars that mingle with the local
traction traffic. They bring men whose
errand is to buy or sell, or who come to
play golf on the free course at Riverside
Park, or on the private grounds of the
Country Club. These cars carry freight,
too, and while they disfigure the streets,
no one has made any serious protest, for
are not the Hoosiers welcome to their
capital, no matter how and when they
visit it ; and is not this free intercourse,
as the phrase has it, " a good thing for
Indianapolis " ? This contact between
town and country tends to keep alive a
state feeling, and as the capital grows, —
as, let us say, it takes on more and more
a metropolitan spirit, — the value of this
intimacy will have an increasing value,
making a neighborhood of a large area.
The rural free delivery of mail is another
factor to be suggested in indicating the
peculiar position occupied by Indianapo-
lis as the centre of state life. A central
Indiana farmer's wife may take a news-
Indianapolis : a City of Homes.
841
paper from the country carrier at her
own door, read the advertisement of an
entertainment or bargain sale at Indian-
apolis, and within an hour or so she can
he set down in Washington Street. The
economic bearing of these changes on the
country merchant is a serious matter that
need only be mentioned here.
Unlike many other American cities,
Indianapolis has never been dominated
by a few rich men. The rich boss has
never ruled it ; the men of wealth there
have usually possessed character as well.
And when, in this frugal, cautious capi-
tal, a rich man is indicated, the term is
relative in a purely local sense. It is
probably fair to say that there are more
large fortunes in the much smaller towns
of Dayton or Columbus, Ohio, than in
Indianapolis, where a quarter of a mil-
lion dollars is enough to make a man
conspicuously rich.
There is something neighborly and
cosy about Indianapolis. The man across
the street or next door will share any
good thing he has with you, whether it
be a cure for rheumatism, a new book,
or the garden hose. It is a town where
doing as one likes is not a mere possi-
bility, but an inherent right. The only
thing that is insisted on is respectability,
— a black alpaca, Sunday-afternoon kind
of respectability. You may, in short, be
forgiven for being rich and making a
display ; but you must be good.
The typical citizen is still one who is
well satisfied with his own hearth, —
who takes his business seriously on week
days, and goes to church on Sundays,
that he may gain grace by which to view
tolerantly his profane neighbor of the
new order who spends Sunday at the
Country Club. The woman of Indian-
apolis is not afraid to venture abroad
with her market basket, albeit she may
ride in a carriage. The public market
at Indianapolis is an ancient and honor-
able institution, and there is no shame
and much honor in being seen there in
conversation with the farmer and the
gardener or the seller of herbs, in the
early hours of the morning. The mar-
ket is so thoroughly established in pub-
lic affection that the society reporter
walks its aisles in pursuit of news. The
true Indianapolis housewife goes to mar-
ket ; the mere resident of the city orders
by telephone, and takes what the grocer
has to offer ; and herein lies a difference
that is not half so superficial as it may
sound, for at heart the people who are
related to the history and tradition of
Indianapolis are simple and frugal, and
if they read Emerson and Browning by
the evening lamp, they know no reason
why they should not distinguish, the next
morning, between the yellow - legged
chicken offered by the farmer's wife at
the market and frozen fowls of doubtful
authenticity that have been held for a
season in cold storage.
The narrow margin between the great
parties in Indiana has made the capital
a centre of incessant political activity.
The geographical position of the city
has also contributed to this, the state
leaders and managers being constant
visitors. Every second man you meet is
a statesman ; every third man is an ora-
tor. The largest social club in Indian-
apolis exacts a promise of fidelity to the
Republican party, and within its portals
chances and changes of men and mea-
sures are discussed tirelessly. And the
pilgrim from abroad is not bored with
talk of local affairs ; not a bit of it ! The
nation's future is at once disclosed to
him. If, however, he wishes to obtain
a Godkinian forecast, he can be accom-
modated at the University Club grill-
room, where a court of destructive critics
meets daily at high noon. The presence
in the city, through many years, of men
of national prominence — Morton, Har-
rison, Hendricks, McDonald, English,
Gresham — further helped to make Indi-
anapolis a political centre. Geography
plays a chief part in the distribution of
favors by state nominating conventions.
Rivalry between the smaller towns is not
842
Indianapolis : a City of Homes.
so marked as their united stand against
the capital. The city has had, at least
twice, both United States Senators ; but
governors have usually been summoned
from the country. Harrison was defeated
for governor by a farmer (1876), in a
heated campaign, in which " Kid-Gloved
Harrison " was held up to derision by
the adherents of " Blue Jeans Williams."
And again, in 1880, a similar situation
was presented in the contest for the same
office between Albert G. Porter and
Franklin Landers, both of Indianapo-
lis, though Landers stood for the rural
" Blue Jeans " idea.
The high tide of political interest was
reached in the summer and fall of 1888,
when Harrison made his campaign for
the presidency, largely from his own
doorstep. For a man who was reckoned
cold by acquaintances, his candidacy
evoked an enthusiasm at home that was
a marked tribute to Mr. Harrison's dis-
tinguished ability as a lawyer and states-
man. The people of Indiana did not love
him, perhaps, but they had an immense
admiration for his talents. Morton was
a masterful and dominating leader ; Hen-
dricks was gracious and amiable ; while
Gresham waa singularly magnetic and
more independent in his opinions than
his contemporaries. William H. English
had been a member of Congress from a
southern Indiana district before remov-
ing to Indianapolis, and an influential
member of the constitutional convention
of 1850. He was throughout his life
a painstaking student of public affairs.
When he became his party's candidate for
Vice President on the ticket with Han-
cock in 1880, much abuse and ridicule
were directed against him on account of
his wealth ; but he was a man of rugged
native force, who stood stubbornly for
old-fashioned principles of government,
and labored to uphold them. Harrison
was the most intellectual of the group,
and he had, as few Americans have ever
had, the gift of vigorous and polished
speech. He did not win men by ease of
intercourse, or drive them by force of per-
sonality, but he instructed and convinced
them, through an appeal to reason and
without the lure of specious oratory. He
stood finely as a type of what was best
in the old and vanishing Indianapolis, —
for the domestic and home-loving ele-
ment that dominated the city from its
beginning practically to the end of the
last century.
The spirit of independence that
gained a footing in the Elaine campaign
of 1884 came to stay. Marion Coun-
ty, of which Indianapolis is the seat, was
for many years Republican ; but neither
county nor city has for a decade been
" safely " Democratic or Republican.
There is a considerable body of inde-
pendent voters, and they have rebuked
incompetence, indifference, and vice re-
peatedly and drastically ; and they have
resented the effort often made to intro-
duce national issues into local affairs.
At the city election held in October,
1903, a Democrat was elected mayor
over a Republican candidate who had
been renominated in a " snap " conven-
tion, in the face of aggressive opposition
within his party. The issue was tautly
drawn between corruption and vice on
the one hand and law and order on the
other. An independent candidate, who
had also the Prohibition support, re-
ceived over 5000 votes. In this connec-
tion it may be said that the Indianapolis
public schools owe their marked excel-
lence and efficiency to their complete di-
vorcement from political influence. This
has not only assured the public an intel-
ligent and honest expenditure of school
funds, — and the provision is generous,
— but it has created a corps spirit among
the city's 750 teachers, admirable in it-
self, and tending to cumulative benefits
not yet realized. A supervising teacher
— a woman — was lately offered a like
position in another city at double the
salary paid her at Indianapolis, and she
declined merely because of the security
of her tenure. The superintendent of
Indianapolis : a City of Homes.
843
schools has absolute power of appoint-
ment, and he is accountable only to the
commissioners, and they in turn are en-
tirely independent of the mayor and
other city officers. Positions on the
school board are not sought by politi-
cians. The incumbents serve without
pay, and the public evince a disposition
to find good men and keep them in office.
The soldiers' monument at Indianapo-
lis, which testifies to the patriotism and
sacrifice of the Indiana soldier and
sailor, is a testimony also to the deep
impression made by the civil war on the
people of the state. The monument is
to Indianapolis what the Washington
Monument is to the national capital. The
incoming traveler sees it afar, and within
the city it is almost an inescapable thing.
It stands in a circular plaza that was
originally a park known as the Govern-
or's Circle. This was long ago aban-
doned as a site for the governor's man-
sion, but it offered an ideal spot for a
monument to Indiana soldiers, when, in
1887, the General Assembly authorized
its construction. The height of the mon-
ument from the street level is 284 feet,
and it stands on a stone terrace 110 feet
in diameter. The shaft is crowned by
a statue of Victory thirty-eight feet
high. It is built throughout of Indiana
limestone. The fountains at the base,
the heroic sculptured groups " War " and
" Peace," and the bronze astragals re-
presenting the army and navy, are ad-
mirable in design and execution. The
whole effect is one of poetic beauty and
power. There is nothing cheap, tawdry,
or commonplace in this magnificent trib-
ute of Indiana to her soldiers. The
monument is a memorial of the soldiers
of all the wars in which Indiana has par-
ticipated. The veterans of the civil war
protested against this, and the contro-
versy was long and bitter ; but the cap-
ture of Vincennes from the British in
1779 is made to link Indiana to the war
of the Revolution ; and the battle of
Tippecanoe, to the war of 1812. The
five Indiana regiments contributed to
the American army in the war with
Mexico, and 7400 men enlisted for the
Spanish war are remembered. It is,
however, the war of the Rebellion,
whose effect on the social and political
life of Indiana was so tremendous, that
gives the monument its great cause for
being. The population of Indiana in
1860 was 1,350,000; the total enlist-
ment of soldiers and sailors during the
ensuing years of war was 210,497 ; and
the names of these men lie safe for pos-
terity in the base of the gray shaft.
A good deal of humor has in recent
years been directed toward Indiana as a
literary centre, but Indianapolis as a vil-
lage boasted writers of at least local
reputation, and Coggeshall's Poets and
Poetry of the West (1867) attributes
half-a-dozen poets to the Hoosier capital.
The Indianapolis press has been distin-
guished always by enterprise and de-
cency, and in several instances by vigor-
ous independence. The literary quality
of the city's newspapers was high, even
in the early days, and the standard has
not been lowered. Poets with cloaks
and canes were, in the eighties, pretty
prevalent in Market Street near the Post
Office, the habitat then of most of the
newspapers. The poets read their verses
to one another and cursed the magazines.
A reporter on one of the papers, who
had scored the triumph of a poem in
the Atlantic, was a man of mark among
the guild for years. The local wits
stabbed the fledgeling bards with their
gentle ironies. A young woman of social
prominence printed some verses in an
Indianapolis newspaper, and one of her
acquaintances, when asked for his opin-
ion of them, said they were creditable
and ought to be set to music, — and
played as an instrumental piece ! The
wide popularity attained by Mr. James
Whitcomb Riley quickened the literary
impulse, and the fame of his elders and
predecessors suffered severely from the
fact that he did not belong to the cloaked
844
Indianapolis : a City of Homes.
brigade. General Lew. Wallace never
D
lived at Indianapolis save for a few years
in boyhood, while his father was govern-
or, though he has in recent years spent
his winters there. Maurice Thompson's
muse scorned " paven ground," and he
was little known at the capital even dur-
ing his term of office as state geologist,
when 'he came to town frequently from
Crawfordsville, the home of General
Wallace also. Mr. Booth Tarkington,
a native of the city, has lifted the banner
anew for a younger generation.
If you do not meet an author at every
corner, you are at least never safe from
the man that reads books. In a Mis-
souri River town, a stranger must listen
to the old wail against the railroads ; at
Indianapolis he must listen to politics,
and possibly some one will ask his opin-
ion of a sonnet, just as though it were a
cigar. A judge of the United States
Court, sitting at Indianapolis, was for-
ever locking the door of his private of-
fice, to the end that some attorney, call-
ing on business, might listen to an Hora-
tian ode. There was indeed a time —
consule Planco — when most of the
Federal office-holders at Indianapolis
were bookish men. Three successive
clerks of the Federal courts were schol-
ars ; the pension agent was an enthusi-
astic Shakespearean ; the district attorney
was a poet, and the master of chancery
a man of varied learning, who was so
good a talker that, when he met Lord
Chief Justice Coleridge abroad, the Eng-
lish jurist took the Hoosier with him on
circuit, and wrote to the justice of the
American Supreme Court who had intro-
duced them, to " send me another man
as good."
It is possible for a community which
may otherwise lack a true local spirit to
be unified through the possession of a
sense of humor ; and even in periods of
financial depression the town has always
enjoyed the saving grace of a cheerful,
centralized intelligence. The first tav-
ern philosophers stood for this, and the
courts of the early times were touched
with it, — as witness all western chroni-
cles. The middle western people are pre-
eminently humorous, particularly those
of the Southern strain from which Lin-
coln sprang. During all the years that
the Hoosier suffered the reproach of the
outside world, the citizen of the capital
never failed to appreciate the joke when
it was on himself ; and, looking forth
from the wicket of the city gate, he was
still more keenly appreciative when it
was on his neighbors. The Hoosier is
a natural story-teller ; he relishes a joke,
and to talk is his ideal of social enjoy-
ment. This was true of the early Hoo-
sier, and it is true to-day of his successor
at the capital. The Monday night meet-
ings of the Indianapolis Literary Club
— organized in 1877 and with a contin-
uous existence to this time — have been
marked by bright talk. The original
members are nearly all gone; but the
sayings of a group of them — the stiletto
thrusts of Fishback, the lawyer; the
droll inadvertences of Livingston How-
land, the judge ; and the inimitable an-
ecdotes of Myron Reed, soldier and
preacher — crept beyond the club's walls
and became town property. This club
is old and well seasoned. It is exclusive,
— so much so that one of its luminaries
remarked that if all of its members
should be expelled for any reason, none
could hope to be readmitted. It has
entertained but four pilgrims from the
outer world, — Matthew Arnold, Dean
Farrar, Joseph Parker, and John Fiske.
The Hoosier capital has always been
susceptible to the charms of oratory.
Most of the great lecturers in the gold-
en age of the American lyceum were
welcomed cordially at Indianapolis. The
Indianapolis pulpit has been served by
many able men, and great store is still
set by preaching. When Henry Ward
Beecher ministered to the congregation
of the Second Presbyterian Church
(1838-46), his superior talents were re-
cognized and appreciated. He gave a
The Literary Aspect of Journalism.
845
series of seven lectures to the young men
of the city during the winter of 1843-44,
on such subjects as Industry, Gamblers
and Gambling, Popular Amusements,
etc., which were published at Indianapo-
lis immediately, in response to an urgent
request signed by thirteen prominent
men of the. city and state.
The women of Indianapolis have aided
greatly in fashioning the city into an en-
lightened community. The wives and
daughters of the founders were often wo-
men of cultivation, and much in the char-
acter of the city to-day is plainly trace-
able to their work and example. Dur-
ing the civil war they did valiant service
in caring for the Indiana soldier. The
Indiana Sanitary Commission was the
first organization of its kind in the
United States. The women of Indian-
apolis built for themselves in 1888 a
building — thePropylaeum — wheremany
clubs meet ; and they have been the
mainstay of the Indianapolis Art Asso-
ciation, which, by a generous and unex-
pected bequest a few years ago, is now
able to build a permanent museum and
school on the charming site of an old
homestead. It is worth remembering
that the first woman's club in the West,
at least, was organized on Hoosier soil
— at Robert Owen's New Harmony —
in 1859. The Indianapolis Woman's
Club is thirty years old.
The citizens like their Indianapolis,
and with reason. It is a place of charm
and vigor, — the charm and ease of con-
tentment dating from the old days, min-
gled with the earnest challenge and ro-
bust faith of to-day. Here you have an
admirable instance of the secure building
of an American city with remarkably
little alien influence, — a city of sound
credit abroad, which offers on its com-
mercial and industrial sides a remarkable
variety of opportunities. It is a city that
brags less of its freight tonnage than of
its public schools ; but it is proud of both.
At no time in its history has it been in-
different to the best thought and achieve-
ment of the world ; and what.it has found
good it has secured for its own. A kind-
ly, generous, hospitable people are these
of this Western capital, finely representa-
tive of the product of democracy as de-
mocracy has exerted its many forces
and disciplines in the broad, rich Ohio
Valley.
Meredith Nicholson,
THE LITERARY ASPECT OF JOURNALISM.
IT is a pity that we cannot get on
without definitions, but there is too much
convenience in them, too much safety.
They accoutre us, they marshal us the
way that we are going, they help us
along the difficult middle path of argu-
ment, they comfort our declining pe-
riods. Poor relations, to be sure, and
not to be made too much of ; but, at least,
one ought not to be ashamed of them
in company. If there are abstract
terms which can safely be employed off-
hand, the terms of literary, criticism are
hardly among them. What wonder ?
If political economists find it hard to
determine the meaning of words like
" money " and " property," how shall
critics agree in defining such imponder-
able objects as genius, art, literature ?
Is literature broadly " the printed word,"
the whole body of recorded speech ? Or
is it the product of a conscious and reg-
ulated, but not inspired, art ? Or is it,
with other products of art, due to that
expression of personality through crafts-
manship which we call genius ? To the
last put question I should say yes ; con-
fessing faith in personal inspiration as
846
The Literary Aspect of Journalism.
the essential force in literature, and in
the relative rather than absolute charac-
ter of such personal inspiration, or gen-
ius. I think of literature not as ceas-
ing to exist beyond the confines of poetry
and belles-lettres, but as embracing what-
ever of the printed word presents, in
any degree, a personal interpretation of
life. What he is and has, — some touch
of genius, some property of wisdom,-
some hold (however partial and uncon-
scious) upon the principles of literary
art, — these things enable a writer for
interpretative or " creative " work.
From this point of view journalism
has, strictly, no literary aspect; it has
certain contacts with literature, and that
is all. The real business of journalism is
to record or to comment, not to create or
to interpret. In its exercise of the record-
ing function it is a useful trade, and in
its commenting office it takes rank as a
profession ; but it is never an art. As
a trade it may apply rules, as a profes-
sion it may enforce conventions ; it can-
not embody principles of universal truth
and beauty as art embodies them. It is
essentially impersonal, in spirit and in
method. A journalist cannot, as a jour-
nalist, speak wholly for himself ; he
would be like the occasional private cit-
izen who nominates himself for office.
A creator of literature is his own can-
didate, his own caucus, his own argu-
ment, and his own elector. It is aut
Ccesar aut nullus with him, as with the
aspirant in any other form of art. This
is why an unsuccessful author is so much
more conspicuous an object of ridicule
than other failures. He has proposed
himself for a sort of eminence, and
has proved to be no better than a Chris-
tian or an ordinary man. He might,
perhaps, have been useful in some more
practical way, — for instance, in journal-
ism, which offers a respectable mainte-
nance, at least, to the possessor of verbal
talent. Its ex parte impersonality af-
fords him a surer foothold at the outset.
Pure journalism has no need of genius ;
it is an enterprise, not an emprise. It
records fact, and on the basis of such
fact utters the opinion of partisan con-
sensus, of editorial policy, or, at its point
of nearest approach to literature, of in-
dividual intelligence.
But it happens that pure journalism
is hardly more common than pure liter-
ature. The " spark of genius " is, one
must think, more than a metaphor. If
it did not often appear in writers whose
principal conscious effort is given to the
utilization of talent, there would be no
question of anything more than contrast
between literature and journalism.
There is a mood in which every thought-
ful reader or writer is sure to sympa-
thize with a favorite speculation of the
late Sir Leslie Stephen's. " I rather
doubt," he expressed it not long ago in
the pages of the Atlantic, " whether the
familiar condemnation of mediocre poet-
ry should not be extended to medioc-
rity in every branch of literature. . . .
The world is the better, no doubt, even
for an honest crossing-sweeper. But I
often think that the value of second-rate
literature is — not small, but — simply
zero. ... If one does not profess to be
a genius, is it not best to console one's
self with the doctrine that silence is
golden, and take, if possible, to the spade
or the pickaxe, leaving the pen to one's
betters ? "
One's betters, — it is, after all, an in-
definite phrase. Are they only the best ?
Attempts to establish an accurate rank-
ing of genius have proved idle enough.
It is not altogether agreed whether the
greatest names can be counted on the fin-
gers of one hand or of two ; it is fairly
well understood that they are worth all
the other names " put together." But
does it follow that all the other names
are, therefore, worth nothing ? The foot-
hills have never been quite put to shame
by the loftiest summits. I do not see
that it is altogether admirable, this in-
The Literary Aspect of Journalism.
847
stinct which makes men querulous for
the best. One may be reasonably cred-
ulous as to the average of human ability
without perceiving anything mediocre in
the next best, or in the next to that.
Surely there is nothing trivial in the
employment of the least creative faculty,
if it does not interfere with more impor-
tant functions. That primum mobile,
the question of the major utility, is an
ancient battleground upon which we
shall hardly venture to set foot. Here
are still fought over the eternal issues
between commerce and the arts, science
and the classics, the practical and the
ideal. It is for us only to skirt the edge
of conflict with the admission that a great
talent may be more effective, even more
permanently effective, than a small gen-
ius ; as a Jeffrey has proved to be more
effective than a Samuel Rogers. It is,
for whatever the fact may be worth, the
man of affairs, the man of opinions, rather
than the seer or the poet, who determines
what the next step of the infant world
shall be.
The fact of Sir Leslie Stephen's career
yields a sufficient gloss upon the letter of
his theory, — if theory is not too serious
a word for his half-ironical speculation.
He had, by his own account, no natural
impulse toward production in the forms
which are commonly called creative. He
was prevented from becoming a poet (as
he admits with his usual engaging frank-
ness) by his inability to write verse ; and
his instinct did not lead him toward fic-
tion. His only path to literature lay
through a superior kind of journalism.
Among his staff colleagues upon the
Saturday Review, the Pall Mall Ga-
zette, and elsewhere, were Mill, Ven-
ables, Mark Pattison, Froude, Freeman,
Thackeray, and John Morley. He does
not think too highly of the profession in
which such men were, at least tempo-
rarily, engaged. He records, not with-
out malice, the fact that Jeffrey, a
prince among journalists, complained
of Carlyle's being " so desperately in
earnest." He speaks with admiration
of Carlyle's having himself been suc-
cessful in resisting "the temptations
that most easily beset those who have
to make a living by the trade." He
permits himself an ironical comment
upon Mill's comparison of the modern
newspaper press and the Hebrew pro-
phets. " There are not many modern
journalists," he remarks with misleading
mildness, " who impress one by their
likeness to a Jeremiah or a John the Bap-
tist. The man who comes to denounce
the world is not likely to find favor with
the class which lives by pleasing it." Fi-
nally, he thinks it proper to say yet more
sharply, "To be on the right side is an
irrelevant question in journalism." Sir
Leslie's personality was not of the sub-
duable kind, and presently found its
proper expression in the varied labors of
a man of letters. His journalistic expe-
rience could be only a temporary phase.
II.
Those who have approached literature
through journalism are legion, but they
are only indirectly connected with our
present theme. More to our purpose are
the many writers of power whose per-
manent and absorbing task is journalism,
but whose work is so unmistakably in-
formed with personality, so pure in
method and in contour, as to outrank in
literary quality the product of many a lit-
erary workshop. Such writers may have
been capable of attaining a real, though
not a great, success in more purely liter-
ary forms ; yet their achievement leaves
us no room for regret. Their business
has been to record and to estimate facts
and conditions of the moment ; their in-
stinct has led them to offer a personal
interpretation of these facts and condi-
tions. Our only cause of embarrassment
lies in the resultant character of the given
product. It is not a little difficult to
reduce to a category such men as Chris-
topher North, Jeffrey, Steevens, or God-
kin. Journalism is concerned with im-
848
The Literary Aspect of Journalism.
mediate phenomena. Talent, for its
empirical method of dealing with the data
afforded by such phenomena, finds a safe-
guard in the impersonal or partisan atti-
tude ; it is enabled, at least, to generalize
by code to a practical end. A journalist
whose impersonal talent, let us say, is
unable to subdue his personal genius,
feels the inadequacy of this method. He
has a hankering for self-expression. He
is dissatisfied with this hasty summariz-
ing of facts, this rapid postulating of
inferences. He insensibly extends his
function, reinforces analysis with insight:
and produces literature. He has not been
able to confine himself to telling or saying
something appropriate to the moment;
he has merely taken his cue from the mo-
ment, and busied himself with saying
what is appropriate to himself and to the
truth as he knows it. He has, in short,
ceased to be a machine or a mouthpiece,
and become a "creative " writer.
Of course the same thing happens in
other arts, and in other forms of the
printed word. In history, in private or
public correspondence, in the gravest
scientific writing, even, one often per-
ceives a sort of " literature of inadver-
tence," a literature in effect, though not
in primary intent. There is, indeed, no
form of writing except what baldly re-
cords, mechanically compiles, or conven-
tionally comments, which may not give
expression, however incidental or imper-
fect, to personality, to the power of inter-
pretation as contrasted with the power of
communication.
ill.
We may consider a little in detail the
two functions of pure journalism, and
note how easily they transform into the
literary or interpretative function. It is
plain that little distinction can be made
between a piece of journalism and a piece
of literature on the ground of external
subject-matter alone. A squalid slum
incident, a fashionable wedding, the es-
cape of a prisoner, the detection of a
forgery, may afford material either for
journalism or for the literary art. In
one instance the product will be interest-
ing as news, in the other because it bears
upon some universal principle or emotion
of human life. So it not seldom happens
that a reporter develops extra-journalistic
skill in the portrayal of experience or
character. Writers of fiction are spawned
almost daily by the humbler press. The
journalistic use of the word " story " in-
dicates the ease of a transition which is
not a wandering from fact to falsity, but
an upward shift from the plane of simple
registry to the plane of interpretation.
Mr. Kipling happens to be the most con-
spicuous modern instance of the report-
ing journalist turned story-writer. It
seems that his genius has led him to the
instinctive development of an art based
upon principles to which he professes a
certain indifference. There are an in-
definite number of ways of inditing tribal
lays, he assures us, and every single one
of them is right. The speculation has
its merits as a tribute to personality ; it
has decided demerits in seeming to lay
stress upon the virtue of mere oddity or
inventive power. Mr. Kipling will even-
tually rank with a class of writers sepa-
rated by a whole limbo from the greatest
creative spirits ; one need not in the least
grudge them their immediate effective-
ness. Greater writers than Mr. Kipling
have been skeptical as to the value of
those lesser forms of art which suggest
mere artifice. Carlyle expressed doubt
as to the permanent effectiveness of what
the Germans call " Kunst : " the con-
scious application of artistic theories or
methods to the expression of truth. In-
deed, to take it seriously at all, one must
take art to be the expression of a per-
sonal creative faculty as distinguished
from that of an impersonal producing
faculty ; the result of a true conscious-
ness of principles, not a mere being aware
of them. So far as a record of immedi-
ate events manifests such a conscious-
ness, it asserts its right to be considered
not as journalism, but as literature.
The Literary Aspect of Journalism.
849
Nor, further, can any fortune of pub-
lication establish a distinction of quality
between these two forms of the printed
word. Not long ago a popular Ameri-
can writer ventured so far as to advance
the theory that it is largely a matter of
luck whether a given bit of writing will
turn out to be literature or not ; unless,
indeed, the act of putting it within cloth
covers be the final guaranty of its quality.
The remark was, we may suppose, not
intended to be taken very seriously. It
is pathetically true that the quality of
minor literature is not determined by the
accident of its disappearance or of its
preservation in book form. Fortunately,
the research of special students and the
enthusiasm of amateur explorers do suc-
ceed in rescuing much of desert from the
diluvial flotsam of the past. Much is
undoubtedly lost. Its vitality has proved
insufficient, over-shadowed in its own
day, perhaps, by superior vitalities. Such
is the fate also of canvases, of statues,
of beautiful buildings. Works of art are
not ephemeral because they fail to live
forever ; we must not be unreasonable
in demanding long life for all that de-
serves the name of literature. Granted
that the literature of the newspaper re-
port has less chance of permanence
than the literature of the magazine or of
the publisher's venture : it nevertheless
serves its purpose ; and perhaps makes
itself felt more than the generality sus-
pect. It may happen that a brief
sketch of some apparently trivial scene
or incident, printed in an obscure jour-
nal, actually excels in pure literary qual-
ity the more elaborate structures of fic-
tion, with all the dignity that may attend
their publication, whether serially or be-
tween covers of their own.
It is evident, moreover, that our defi-
nition of journalism applies to several
large classes of books. There are, for
example, books on exploration, physical
or other ; on anthropological or sociolo-
gical experiment ; books recording spe-
cial conditions, or commenting imper-
VOL. xcin. — NO. 560. 54
son ally on special events, of the day.
The usefulness of such books is obvious ;
they could not well be dispensed with.
Yet it is only in the hands of a Carlyle
or an Arnold or a Ruskin that this kind
of material becomes literature, — an ex-
pression of universal truth in terms of
present fact. Wherever in a journal
personality emerges and fully expresses
itself, literature emerges. Wherever in
literary forms the occasional, the conven-
tional, the partisan, the indecisive per-
sonality, are felt, journalism is present.
IV.
There is another modification of the
recording function which has assumed
great importance in the popular periodi-
cals of the day. The " special article "
represents a development, rather than a
transformation, of the newspaper report
as it deals with conditions. A descrip-
tion of proposed buildings for a new
World's Fair ; a sketch of the relations
between Japan and Korea before the
outbreak of the Russian war ; an account
of recent movements in municipal or
national politics ; a study of a commer-
cial trust : with such articles our maga-
zines are filled. They are a legitimate
and useful product of journalism ; one
should only take care to distinguish
them from that personal creative form,
the essay. The public demand for such
work has given birth to a new race of
special reporters, among whom the pop-
ular idol appears to be that picturesque
adventurer, the war correspondent. Such
men do excellent service. They write
with vivacity and with a kind of indi-
viduality ; but their work is unlikely to
possess the qualities which give perma-
nence. It is a brilliant hazard of de-
scription and comment ; it does all that
talent and special aptitude can do with
the material in hand. Almost inevitably,
it lacks the repose, the finality, the
beauty, which may eventually belong to
a personal or literary treatment of the
same material. This is true even of the
850
The Literary Aspect of Journalism.
product of so vigorous and effective a
writer as the late G. W. Steevens. He
was somewhat too closely involved in the
condition of the moment " to see life
steadily and to see it whole." Such men
are bound to take sides, and are conse-
quently doomed to half-express them-
selves in wholly uttering a point of view
or a phase. Their work will possess
individual unction, but hardly the force
of personal inspiration. It is naturally
overestimated by the public, which is
convinced that talent and energy rule
the world now, no matter what may be
true in the long run ; and that to rule
the world now is the most important of
possible achievements. But, indeed, the
value of such work is not small. One
cannot doubt that it is more meritorious
for a person of moderate ability to fling
himself into the press, and to make sure
of doing one kind of man's work, than
to sit down in a corner and murmur,
" Go to : I am about to be a .genius."
As a matter of fact, most great writers
have been active in affairs, in one way
or other. The Divine Comedy, Hamlet,
Paradise Lost, Faust, show clear traces
of activities far enough from the prac-
tice of letters. Nevertheless, Milton's
criticism of life is to be found in his
poetry rather than in his controversial
prose, and Dante's in his celebration of
Beatrice rather than in his recorded ser-
vices to Florence. The product of such
energy is calculable, the influence of
such genius altogether incalculable.
Between literature and " the higher
journalism " the partition is extremely
thin. If I understand the term, the
higher journalism means the function
of impersonal comment employed at
its utmost of breadth and dignity. It
gives utterance to individual judgment
rather than personal interpretation. It
aims to inform and to convince rather
than to express. It displays real eru-
dition, it urges admirable specifics, it
produces, in fact, printed lectures on prac-
tical themes addressed to the practical
intelligence. One perceives a close ana-
logy between the functions of the higher
journalist and those of the preacher, the
lawyer, and the politician. An exparte
impersonality is all that can be demanded
of any of them, — intellectual indepen-
dence being a desirable asset, but the thing
said being largely determined by a policy,
a creed, a precedent, or a platform. In
any of these professions will appear from
time to time the literary artist, — the
man escaping from preoccupation with
specific methods or ends, and expressing
his personality by some larger interpreta-
tion of life. Hence come our Newmans,
our Burkes, and our Macaulays.
So from the " article " of higher jour-
nalism literature frequently emerges.
The given composition ceases to be a
something " written up " for a purpose,
and becomes a something written out of
the nature of a man. It is not merely an
arrangement of data and opinions ; it stirs
with life, it reaches toward a farther end
than immediate utility. Under such con-
ditions the journalist does honor to his
craft by proving himself superior to it.
He has dedicated his powers to a prac-
tical service ; but he has not been false
to his duty in transcending it.
Nevertheless, his simple duty remains
the same ; all that his office demands of
him is official speech. More than talent
and conformity belongs to the few who
direct the course of journalism ; but even
their admitted powers are rather for
administration than for expression. A
man of this kind is content to embody a
theory in an organ or a group of organs,
to determine an editorial policy, and to
influence public opinion. The genius of
a writer like Godkin cannot be denied ;
it still presides over the admirable jour-
nal which owes its prestige to him. But
it was a genius allied with a moral sense
somewhat too readily moved to indigna-
tion. His was a singular instance of the
nature which prefers the ardor of prompt
service to the ardor of self-utterance.
His work lay, accordingly, upon the bor-
Weeds and flowers.
851
der regions between literature and jour-
nalism.
v.
There seems to be no need of serious-
ly discussing the question of superiority
between the two forms of verbal activ-
ity. Creation is always superior to pro-
duction, but that is not a fact which
ought to trouble honest producers. A
journalist is contemptible only when by
some falsetto method he attempts to lead
the public into fancying that it is get-
ting literature of him. Otherwise he de-
serves, no more than the lawyer or the
clergyman, to be held in disesteem by
men of letters. Some discredit has doubt-
less been cast upon the profession by the
existence of that forlorn army of writ-
ers who would have liked to illumine
the world, but have to make the best of
amusing it, or even to put up with pro-
viding it with information. Since jour-
nalism is a trade, a person of reasonable
endowment may have better hope of
achieving moderate success in it than in
literature. But one does not fit himself
for journalism by failing in literature, any
more than one fits himself for literature
by failing in journalism. To have one's
weak verse or tolerable fiction printed
in a newspaper does not make one a
journalist ; nor does it turn the newspa-
per into a literary publication. Literary
graces ! There are few articles so un-
promising of any good, in the great
journalistic department shop on which
the numei'ical world now depends for
most of its wants.
The popularity of journalism in
America has, we have noted before, re-
acted upon most of our magazines so
strongly that they are distinguished from
the better daily journals by exclusion of
detail and modification of method rather
than by essential contrast in quality.
Upon the character of the daily press, that
is, depends the character of our entire
periodical product ; and this means, in
large measure, the character of the public
taste. To afford a vast miscellaneous
population like ours its only chance of
contact with literature entails a responsi-
bility which may well appall even the
ready and intrepid champions of the daily
press. While, however, the night-fear of
the yellow journal is disturbing enough
to those who watch for the morning, they
will have pleasanter visions, even now not
altogether unrealized, of a journalism
more responsible, more just, more firmly
pursuant of that fine enthusiasm for ab-
solute fitness, for the steady application
of worthy means to worthy ends, which
is the birthright of literature.
H. W. Boynton.
WEEDS AND FLOWERS.
THE flowers are loved, the weeds are spurned,
But for them both the suns are burned ;
And when, at last, they fail the day,
The long night folds them all away.
John Vance Cheney.
852
Books New and Old.
BOOKS NEW AND OLD.
A FEW SPRING NOVELS.
THE flood of spring fiction,1 like other
spring floods, has been formidable in pro-
portion to the length and severity of the
winter ; but the river in which we stagger
will at least not ignite.
Out of a score or more of smartly at-
tired volumes the most important among
the native American products is the
Deliverance, by Miss Ellen Glasgow, —
and even this is hardly up to the high
level of the author's previous work. It
is neither as broad and sane, nor as
masterly in its grasp of complex and
chaotic social conditions, as the Voice of
the People ; nor has it all the solemn
unity and concentrated pathos of the
Battle Ground. Nevertheless, it is a
searching and a striking book ; and, like
its predecessors, it is especially interest-
ing for the strong light it sheds on what,
after a lapse of forty years, is only now
beginning dimly to be perceived as one
of the most momentous consequences to
our whole country of the war of seces-
sion, — the death, namely, and by vio-
lence, — or, at least, the mortal hurt, —
of a comparatively ripe white civilization
in the Southern United States.
The scene of the Deliverance is laid
in Virginia. The time is about twenty
years after the close of the civil war.
1 The Deliverance. By ELLEN GLASGOW.
New York : Doubleday, Page & Co. 1904.
Henderson. By ROSE E YOUNG. Boston
and New York : Houghton, Mifflin & Co. 1904.
An Evans of Suffolk. By ANNA FARQUHAR.
Boston : L. C. Page & Co. 1904.
The Adventures of Elizabeth in Riigen. Lon-
don and New York : The Macmillan Co.
1904.
Violett : a Chronicle. By the BARONESS
VON HUTTEN. Boston and New York : Hough-
ton, Mifflin & Co. 1904.
The Day before Yesterday. By SARA ANDREW
SHAFFER. New York: The Macmillan Co.
1904.
The pitiful relics of the proud old race
which had reigned for generations at
Blake Hall, going their ways of careless
magnificence, and adored, in the main,
by the ever increasing swarms of their
childish dependents, are now reduced to
dire penury, and living a life of grinding
toil, on the produce of a small fragment
of the ancestral tobacco fields, in the
house which was once the overseer's ;
while the overseer, Bill Fletcher, a hoary
reprobate, who had stolen, bit by bit, all
that was left of the Blake possessions
after the fall of the Confederacy, is in-
stalled in their place at the Hall.
The hero of the tale is Christopher
Blake, the youngest child of the fallen
family, and the intrigue turns upon the
conflict in his warped mind between a
steadfast purpose of revenge upon the
usurper and his love for the usurper's
granddaughter. The details of the story
are necessarily painful. The father of
the Blake children had fallen early in
the war. The mother, blind, paralyzed,
and. with memory much impaired, but
stately and overbearing still, is actually
kept in ignorance, through the pious men-
dacity of her children and one or two
devoted old servants, of the fact that they
are no longer living at the Hall, and even
Kwaidan. By LAFCADIO HEARN. Boston
and New York : Houghton, Mifflin & Co. 1904.
Cap'n Eri. By JOSEPH C. LINCOLN. New
York : A. S. Barnes & Co. 1904.
Mrs. M'Ltrie. By J. J. BELL. New York:
The Century Co. 1904.
Running the River. By GEORGE CART EG-
GLESTON. New York : A. S. Barnes & Co.
1904.
Said the Fisherman. By MARMADUKE PICK-
THALL. New York : McClure, Phillips & Co.
1904.
The Great Adventurer. By ROBERT SHACKLE-
FORD. New York: Douhleday, Page & Co.
1904.
Books New and Old.
853
that the Southern Confederacy is no more.
If this deluded lady, and her brother, —
a ruined Confederate officer, — horribly
maimed and mutilated, but of an exceed-
ing sweet and gallant spirit, and, on the
other hand, the coarse monster installed
at Blake Hall, seem collectively a trifle
overdrawn, it cannot be said that either
is an impossible, or even an improbable
figure : while that is indeed a keen ob-
server, and a skilled artist as well, who
can thus draw the hero of the Deliver-
ance as he first appeared to Fletcher's
lawyer, when the latter came to Christo-
pher as the bearer of a peculiarly insult-
ing proposition : —
" He perceived, at once, a certain
coarseness of finish which, despite the
deep-seated veneration for an idle ances-
try, isfound most often in the descendants
of a long line of generous livers. A mo-
ment later, he weighed the keen gray
flash of the eyes, beneath the thick fair
hair, the coating of dust and sweat over
the high-bred curve from brow to nose,
and the fullness of the jaw, which bore,
with a suggestion of sheer brutality, upon
the general impression of a fine, racial
type. Taken from the mouth up, the
face might have passed as a pure, fleshly
copy of the antique ideal ; seen down-
ward, it became almost repelling in its
massive power."
The plan of reprisals over which
Christopher Blake brooded throughout
his growing years was a ruthless, not. to
say a revolting one. How he achieved
his grim purpose, and then, when sud-
denly awakened to a sense of its moral
enormity, what he voluntai-ily under-
went by way of expiation, may best be
read in the book itself. The title of the
tale foreshadows a hopeful conclusion,
and we gladly accept its augury. Never-
theless, it is, as I have said, the haunting
thought of a civilization untimely slain,
which the Deliverance, no less than the
Battle Ground, leaves uppermost in our
minds.
A civilization — any civilization — is
a blossom of time, long prepared, and
slowly perfected. A revolution tears the
flower from its delicate stem, and grinds
it into the dust. The revolution may
have been, by all historic law, a right-
eous one ; the flower not worth, upon the
whole, the lavish cost, to humanity, of its
culture. The doomed order may have
served its purpose, and deserved its
fate. That is not now the point ; but
simply the fact that something fair must
needs perish even in a so-called holy
war, — which it will take uncounted
years of peace to recreate.
One of the most memorable passages
in that very stimulating and instructive
book, Trevelyan's History of the Ameri-
can Revolution, is that in which the au-
thor turns aside from his lively narra-
tive of the sequence of events in 1776,
to describe the modest affluence and quiet
beauty which had, by that time, come
to characterize a good many of the rural
homes in New York and New Jersey, so
soon to be laid waste by the hireling troops
of his most sapient Majesty George III.
The Whig historian paints a wistful and
beguiling picture of what the mere out-
ward aspect of life on the Atlantic sea-
board might have been by this time if
the American Revolution had never taken
place. It is the race-ideal of the English
home : " All things in order stored. A
haunt of ancient peace," — a vision of
mild manners, healthful growth, mod-
erate standards, and mellow surround-
ings. He can hardly be consoled for
those lost amenities, and neither, for the
moment, can I. Yet even there, — in
what used, in those far days, to be called
the Middle States, — and though that
favored region was, and remained until
the long conflict was over, a chief theatre
of military operations, the decivilizing
consequences, to a young community,
of seven years of war were hardly as
marked as in the North, where manu-
factures were completely paralyzed, and
exhausted men had to wring their scant
living out of a -harder soil and under less
854
Books New and Old.
kindly skies. I myself can perfectly re-
member, as a child, hearing very old
people describe the harrowing poverty,
and profound depression among the
farming population of New England, of
the years immediately following the war
of Independence. The men of the Revo-
lution had indeed won, while the men of
the Confederacy had lost ; but there are
moments in the history, both of individ-
uals and nations, when victory, if less
galling, seems almost more barren and
disappointing than defeat. And so we
come back to Miss Glasgow, and her
Southerners of the old social order, and
the good things which undeniably passed
away with them.
One of the best of these I take to
have been the most beautiful use of our
mother tongue, in every-day speech, that
America has yet known. From father
to son, for generations, the well-born
Virginian or Marylander went to Wil-
liam and Mary College, as a matter of
course, and lightly forgot, in his after
life of landed proprietor and sportsman,
a good deal of what he learned there ;
but seldom the trick of that sub-scholarly
English, easy, racy, and felicitous, which
was so much more excellent than the
speaker himself knew. The wives and
daughters of these men used their lan-
guage instinctively, but with a touch of
added refinement, which enhanced its
charm. Happily there are localities and
there are clans in which the tradition
of that pure speech and the soft intona-
tions that accompanied it yet live, and
many a fondly guarded chest of old let-
ters ad Familiares to attest the truth
of what I say. When a Southerner of
the ancient type stood up, of fell purpose,
to make a speech, or sat down to write a
book, he frequently became stilted and
self-conscious ; but his unstudied utter-
ance was both noble and simple ; and
most admirable of all in that it was un-
studied. The unconscious use of gram-
matical niceties is one of the most infal-
lible marks of race. I Jiave known a
white-haired Tuscan woman, bearing the
suggestive name of Massima, who went
out charring at two lire a day, and who
gracefully apologized for pointing out to
her employer that the latter had used
an expression which was not Dantesque.
And a very dear old Parisienne — who
had herself come down to taking pension-
naires for practice in French, said once
to me : " Ma belle-mere etait toute grande
dame. She used the past subjunctive
without thinking" Now the best of us
in New England, and especially in Bos-
ton, can use with precision our equivalent
of the past subjunctive ; but I fear we
seldom do it without a lurking conscious-
ness of literary merit, and a modest an-
ticipation of applause.
There is, however, great danger that
what we typify by the past subjunctive
may soon become more completely a
thing of the past among us than even its
name implies ; and one of its worst foes is
the lavish, not to say shameless, employ-
ment in print of that rude, shapeless, in-
choate utterance which can be represented
to the eye only by bad spelling and worse
grammar, and which has no legitimate
claim whatsoever to the honorable name
of dialect. Even Miss Glasgow's pages
are disfigured by too much of what that
fine purist, Theodore Winthrop, used to
call " black babble." But her own Eng-
lish is very nearly impeccable, — which
is more than can be said for the unques-
tionably clever author of Henderson, or
the unterrified author of An Evans of
Suffolk.
Yet it is hardly fair to bracket these
two books, for Henderson is a great deal
the better performance of the two, and
a decided advance upon its predecessor,
Sally of Missouri. The author can in'
deed use that as a qualifying adverb,
make the nicest of her people preface
their most serious remarks by some such
simian aggregation of consonants as
" mh-hm," and write nonsense, in her own
person, about " the dying day, trailing
off in a shining halation" and the " sud-
Books New and Old.
855
den break " in a woman's " plastic
strength." Nevertheless, her tale is
tersely and dramatically told. The young
surgeon who figures as its hero is an un-
commonly fine fellow, who passionately
does his professional best to save the
husband of the woman whom he loves ;
and may be said to deserve, in a general
way, and under the code prevailing in
fiction, that a big oak tree, uprooted by
a Missouri hurricane, should fall upon
the patient he has loyally healed, in the
last chapter of the book but one.
Miss Young, it appears, has herself
been a medical student, and a brilliant
one. " There 's only one little mistake
in that whole thing ! " was the admiring
comment of a successful surgeon on the
strong chapter entitled the Life on the
Table, which first appeared, I think, in
this magazine. But let her make her
next story a little less pathological. A
romance ought not to reek of chloroform.
Miss Anna Farquhar, having previ-
ously tried her hand at social satire in
Her Boston Experiences, and Her Wash-
ington Experiences, returns to the attack
of the former city in An Evans of Suf-
folk, but can hardly be said to have
effected a serious breach in its venerable
defenses. This book is clever too, > — in
a vain, jaunty, trivial sort of way, with
a cleverness that might be better em-
ployed. We can hardly be expected seri-
ously to believe that a respectable Bos-
tonian, returning to his native town
after a long sojourn in Paris, and being
gravely reminded by somebody's maiden
aunt that her ancestors commanded his
at the battle of Bunker Hill, is so pros-
trated by amusement at the idea as to
drop upon the main stairway of a Bea-
con Street house, in the midst of an
evening reception, and laugh until a
lady's maid has to be summoned to re-
place his missing buttons ! As a bit of
burlesque, upon the other hand, this in-
cident fails to amuse. It would appear
that, after all, and for whatever reason,
the ways of old Boston are not easy to
burlesque. Surely there is, even yet,
and though we live, as one may say,
after the deluge, a character and a cachet
about society there, as marked as in that
of the old-time South ; yet I cannot at
this moment recall a single really good
Boston novel. The Bostonians of Mr.
Henry James was written a long while
ago ; and though the author had, as a
matter of course, full knowledge of his
theme, and could never have committed
those violations of probability and sins
against good taste into which most of his
followers have fallen, his purpose was a
little too obviously and exclusively one
of persiflage. The Rev. Bolton King, in
Let Not Man Put Asunder, caught a bet-
ter likeness, but was not quite fair, upon
the whole, to the morals of the Puritan
city ; while Alice Brown, in her able and
thoughtful story of Margaret Warrener,
did not pretend to go outside the circum-
scribed limits of Boston's rather colorless
Bohemia. The true comedy — and it
should be in the fullest sense of the term
high comedy — of the three hills, and
the westward flats, and the reclaimed
fens, is yet to be written.
The Anglo-Germans are also here, —
bearing what the department stores call
their " Easter gifts." The tricksy but
ever fascinating Elizabeth, who, though
still reveling in the joy of a semi-trans-
parent incognita, takes unquestioned pre-
cedence both by social and literary law,
is at her best and brightest in the new
book, — a narrative of the adventures,
comic and sad, that befell her in the
Baltic island of Rtlgen. She would
seem to have discharged, once for all, —
in that rather caustic tale, the Bene-
factress, — all her accumulated spleen
against the petty ways of the German
female, and the oppressive ways of the
German official, and she now offers her-
self most amiably to be the reader's
guide upon an entirely novel kind of
summer tour. Her temper is, for the
moment, perfectly sunny ; her wit spon-
taneous, unflagging, irresistible. Under
856
Books New and Old.
the spell of her careless and yet
graphic word-painting, we behold great
breadths of dancing waves and the sol-
emn glory of ancient beech woods ; we
see acres of salt meadow all silvery with
plumed cotton-grass, and fairly scent the
exhilarating breeze that blows across
them. And then, the attendants who
minister to my lady's whims, — and the
few other tourists whom she meets upon
her eccentric way, — Cousin Charlotte,
the feministe, and her ineffable spouse ;
Mrs. Harvey-Brown, the bishop's lady
from England, with her simple-minded
son " Brosy," — how demurely, how in-
imitably, with what infectious and yet not
unkindly gayety all these are depicted !
" ' Why Brosy ? ' I took courage to in-
quire.
" ' It is short for Ambrose,' he an-
swered.
" ' He was christened after Ambrose,'
said his mother, ' one of the Early Fa-
thers, as no doubt you know.'
" But I did not know, because she
spoke in German, for the sake, I suppose,
of making things easier for me, and she
called the Early Fathers frilhseitige Va-
ter, so how could I know ? ' Fruhzeitige
Vater,' I repeated dully. ' Who are
they?'
" The bishop's wife took the kindest
view of it. ' Perhaps you do not have
them in the Lutheran Church,' she said ;
but she did not speak to me again at all,
turning her back on me, quite, this time,
and wholly concentrating her attention
upon Charlotte.
" ' My mother,' Ambrose explained in
subdued tones, 'meant to say Kirchen-
vater.' "
Later on in their acquaintance, Mrs.
Harvey-Brown confesses that she had
been much disappointed in the Germans.
" ' How sensible English people are
compared to them ! '
" ' Do you think so ? '
" ' Why, of course ! In everything.'
" ' But are you not judging the whole
nation by a few ? '
" ' Oh, one can always tell. What
could be more supremely senseless, for
instance,' — and she waved a hand over
the bay, — ' than calling the Baltic the
Ostsee ? '
" ' Well, but why should n't they, if
they want to ? '
" ' But, dear Frau X., it is so foolish.
East sea ? Of what is it the east ? One
is always east of something, but one
does n't talk about it ! The name has no
meaning whatever. Now Baltic exactly
describes it.' "
On another occasion, when Mrs. Har-
vey-Brown sniffs insolence in a waiter,
she inquires of the long-suffering Am-
brose whether he does not think they had
better " tell him who father is ; " and
this parochial use of the word father
gives the reader a momentary pause.
Not for the first time since the auspicious
beginning of our acquaintance with Eliza-
beth do we catch, amid her Teutonic ac-
cessories and her studied Anglican allu-
sions, the strangely familiar gleam of an
echter Americanism. " Besides," observes
the inimitable Charlotte, when explaining
how she, too, happened to be in remote
Riigen, " I was run down." He who
can tell us why she did not say " pulled
down " will prove, by the same token,
that he " knows what Rameses knows."
In Violett, by the Baroness von Hut-
ten (Violett is a boy's name, with a pre-
sumable accent on the final syllable), we
have a pathetic and original donnee, and
much of the peculiar grace of narration
which characterized Our Lady of the
Beeches. The new book is a musical
novel, and not exempt from the touch of
morbid sentimentalism which no musical
novel wholly escapes. But the profes-
sional people, in particular, who figure in
its pages, are drawn with a vigor and veri-
similitude which argue personal acquain-
tance ; — the rather cruel Bohemia where
they play their parts is invested with no
false glamour ; and the tragic end of the
sad little story is too inevitable and too
simply told to appear melodramatic.
Books New and Old.
857
As though to reprove all puling pes-
simism and warn the good American
never to despair even of his rude prov-
ince in the republic of letters, there comes
quietly to us, from somewhere in the
Middle West, a very modest and attrac-
tive little book, aptly entitled the Day
before Yesterday. It is not so much a
child's book — though the right sort of
child would revel in it — as a book about
children, — a family chronicle, humorous
and yet reverent, written in sweetest Eng-
lish and with flawless taste. And what
a family life it is which these fond recol-
lections reflect ! — simple, refined, hon-
orable, and pious ; — the life of plain but
thoroughbred village folk, with brave tra-
ditions in this world and stout hope for
the next ; — infinitely amusing, infinitely
affecting ! The locality is not very ex-
actly defined. We only know that it was
west of Ohio, east of the Mississippi, and
within easy reach of the great prairies,
that this immaculate race, with ancestors
in Virginian churchyards, and cousins in
New England colleges, had laid already,
in the first half of the last century, the
foundations of a home, the very moral of
what Sir George Trevelyan dreamed the
American home might have been — if
only it had remained English ; the type
— thank God ! for it is more to the pur-
pose now — of many in that vast mid-
land, which has come, in the course of
human events, to hold the balance of our
national destinies.
Thus far, our novelists of the vernal
season have all been women. The sex
is doing its level best to monopolize the
great industry of fiction-spinning, and
has less to dread this year than usual,
it may be, from its male competitors.
We find no very distinguished name
among these last except that of Lafcadio
Hearn, who has collected in Kwaidan :
or Stories and Studies of Strange Things,
a series of Japanese ghost stories, dainty,
wistful, beautiful ; — all softly permeated
by that amiable view of death which we
must go to the far East to find in its per-
fection ; and rendered into English with
all the sympathetic insight and airy light-
ness of diction of which the Lecturer on
English Literature in the Imperial Uni-
versity of Tokyo has, many times before,
given us admirable examples. After the
ghost stories proper come three Insect
Studies, from Japanese and Chinese
sources : on Butterflies, on Mosquitoes,
and on Ants. The first of these contains
a few exquisite English versions of Jap-
anese hokku, or seventeen-syllable poems.
The last, in gravely calling our attention
to that very complete solution of some of
the more perplexing of our social and
sexual problems, which was long since
reached in the formic societies, furnishes
one of the most delicate and delightful
pieces of satire one has met for many a
day. And we may profess and proclaim
what we will touching the theoretic obli-
gation of national neutrality, — there is
no disguising the quickened throb of sym-
pathy which we all feel, just now, with
the gallant little David of the farthest
Orient, and the good fight he has made,
so far, against the Russian Goliath.
For the rest, we have the inevitable
deluge of dialect, falsely so-called : — the
genial crudities of a nautical Yankee
commonly called Cap'n Eri ; a regret-
table attempt to repeat, in the depress-
ing memorials of one Mrs. M'Lerie, the
fortuitous triumphs of Wee Macgreegor ;
a number of dark and bloody studies
in socialistic fiction, a la Tolstoi, and
a la Gorki ; a book for boys, by George
Gary Eggleston, entitled Running the
River, brisk and, presumably, whole-
some, of which the moral is, frankly,
that the young American should be up
and making money ere he loses the dew
of his youth.
Finally, we have two books by men
not yet widely known, but from whom
we are led, by their present performance,
to look for something excellent in the
future. These are, Said the Fisherman,
by Marmaduke Pickthall, and the Great
Adventurer, by Robert Shackleford.
858
Books New and Old.
The story of Said, comprising, first
the Book of his Luck, and second, the
Book of his Fate, is an Arabian tale, and,
considered merely as a literary essay, it
is already a work of remarkable matu-
rity and finish. Its inspiration is, of
course, drawn from the same inexhausti-
ble source as that of Vathek, and Hadji
Baba, and the Shaving of Shagpat. The
Thousand and One Nights can still sup-
ply material for endless wonder-tales;
but while those which I have named are
all classics, in their way, the story of
Said, which is neither an intentional sa-
tire like the histories of Shagpat and
Hadji, nor a mere opium-fed fantasia,
like Beckford's famous novel, is perhaps
more intimately and entirely Oriental
than either. It is more so even than
Kim, because it is more purely objective,
and the author effaces his own personal-
ity, as Kipling never can. Said is a
drama of modern life, introducing recent
and well-known historic incidents. The
spirit, the motive, and the moral of it —
for it has a very distinct moral — are all
purely and simply Mohammedan ; while
the scenery of the ever picturesque East
is laid in by the hand of a rare artist.
One may open the book at random, and
find upon almost any page a tiny vignette,
as accurately drawn, as gemlike in the
brilliancy of its color, as this : —
" It was the fourth hour of the day,
and not until the flush of evening have
men leisure to go forth and drink the
sweet air of the garden. A stone bridge
of a single lofty arch, which bestrode
the wady lower down, looked at frag-
ments of its likeness in the eddies and
seemed nodding to sleep. The vast blue
cope of the firmament paled everywhere
toward the horizon in pearly haze.
Abundance of leafage compassed the
place on every side, but at one point,
through a gap in the branches, the old
wall of the city was visible, the white
cube of an upper chamber peeping over
it, with a bulging lattice and a single
minaret cleaving the soft distance."
It would be unreasonable to expect
Mr. Marmaduke Pickthall ever to write
much better than he has done in Said ;
but one must earnestly hope that he will
soon — and yet not too soon ! — write
more.
Precisely as far as the typical West
from the traditional East is the scene of
the Great Adventurer removed from that
of Said the Fisherman. The Adventurer
also may be described — in the journal-
istic sense — as an " inspired " book ; in-
spired in this instance by the fiery exam-
ple of the late lamented Frank Norris.
It was inevitable that the daring author
of the Octopus and the Pit should find
followers ; and Mr. Shackleford seems an
earnest, virile, and not altogether unwor-
thy one. His Adventurer — Newbury
Linn — is the founder of a stupendous
trust, or, rather, a combination of many
trusts, aiming at nothing less than the
commercial sovereignty of the civilized
world. The story is developed with a cer-
tain hard strength. The author betrays
a curious apparent indifference to what
may be called — by comparison at least
with the colossal iniquity which he aims to
signalize — the minor morals. We miss
altogether from his dry pages the poetry,
the passion, the strong lift of humanistic
enthusiasm, which redeemed and digni-
fied the very meanest episodes in Mr.
Norris's unfinished tragedy. Yet the in-
veterate idealism of the American asserts
itself at the last, bringing the too trite
story of Newbury Linn to a novel and
impressive end. The failure of his great
scheme, when on the very brink of suc-
cess, is due, not so much to the coun-
ter-combination which was desperately
planned for its defeat, as to a species of
moral arrest, — the sudden, but decisive
recoil of a curiously belated conscience
in the breast of the Adventurer himself.
Then resolutely, deliberately, of his own
free act and purpose, he undertakes to
dissolve the vast alliance which had been
consolidated by his own Satanic ingenu-
ity. He demolishes what he had reared,
Books New and Old.
859
undoes the work of his life, and releases,
by his own fiat, the myriad spirits con-
fined in the prison of his tyranny. Prosit.
H. W. P.
MUSICAL criticism that is at once sug-
Mr. Hune- gestive and simple, original
ker's Musi- ' , , . . .
cal Essays, and obvious, is rare in these
days of democracy in art. The great
mass of writing on musical topics is for
popular perusal, with little or nothing to
commend it to music lovers who have
more than a rudimentary knowledge of
the subject. But once in a while there
appears a writer who addresses himself
to the musical thinker, and whose ideas
are expressed in such striking literary
language as to render the most recondite
of them persuasively clear. Such a
writer is James Huneker, whose latest
volume * of essays has just been pub-
lished. The collection embraces some
essays that are not strictly musical.
There is one on Nietzsche, one on Flau-
bert, the " Beethoven of Prose " as he is
denominated, and one on Literary Men
Who Loved Music. Several of them
have appeared in the magazines, and are
republished in amplified and otherwise
altered form. All are fascinating read-
ing. The volume is inscribed to Richard
Strauss, the " Anarch of Art," who is
the subject of the first essay.
Mr. Huneker has written a brilliant
and comprehensive study of Strauss.
Even allowing for the natural lean to-
ward his subject of the moment, it is
plain that Mr. Huneker pins his faith
strongly on the new anarch of art. He
finds that Strauss has restored to instru-
mental music its rightful sovereignty,
threatened by the Wagnerian cohorts,
that he has revolutionized symphonic
music by breaking down its formal bar-
riers, and has filled his tone-poems with
a new and diverse content. Big words
these. But Huneker goes farther. He
1 Overtones : A Book of Temperaments. By
JAMES HUNEKER. New York : Charles Scrib-
ner's Sons. 1904.
does not hesitate to pit Strauss against
the master minds of music and to award
him the palm. " Berlioz never dared,
Liszt never invented, such miracles of
polyphony, a polyphony beside which
Wagner's is child's play and Bach's is
outrivaled." One may protest that all
this is extravagant, and that prudence
would dictate a little more reserve in
eulogizing the work of a man of forty,
still in his storm and stress period ; but
one must admit that Huneker has the
courage of his convictions, and very firm
convictions they seem to be. The other
side of the picture, — Strauss's over-
emphasis of color schemes and mere
size, and his apparent neglect of musical
values except as tested by programmatic
expressiveness — Mr. Huneker ignores.
He concedes that his musical themes, qua
themes, are not to be matched with Bee-
thoven's, but the drift of his argument
seems to be that the hypnotic power of
Strauss's music prevents the absence of
that melodic invention, which calm, crit-
ical judgment would demand, from being
noticed. Or, putting it in another way,
Strauss's music may sound better than
it is ; and so long as the fact is disguised,
and no one the wiser, it is not to be de-
precated. However, this is not the place
to discuss Strauss, but Huneker ; and he
has written an interesting, though ex-
treme, " appreciation " of the composer
who to-day is unquestionably the great-
est figure on the musical horizon.
The essay on Parsifal is more or less
a protest against the sudden and exagger-
ated wave of popular enthusiasm started
by the recent production of the opera in
New York. As such, it may be taken
with the proverbial grain of salt. There
is something fascinating in the very ex-
travagance of Mr. Huneker's critical ob-
jurgations. Of the book he says : " It is
a farrago of odds and ends, the very dust-
bin of his philosophies, beliefs, vegeta-
rian, anti-vivisection, and other fads.
You see unfold before you a nightmare
of characters and events. Without sim-
860
Books New and Old.
plicity, without lucidity, without natural-
ness — Wagner is the great anti-natural-
ist among composers — this book, through
which has been sieved Judaism, Bud-
dhism, Christianity, Schopenhauerism,
astounds one by its puerility, its vapidity."
He adds that " Wagner spread his mu-
sic thin over a wide surface," and sums
it all up with the remark that Parsifal
is the weakest composition its creator
ever planned. But if Mr. Huneker's
thesis finds few supporters, it is by no
means untenable, as his able brief
proves.
Of Nietzsche, Mr. Huneker has many
acceptable things to say, and he gossips
entertainingly of Turgenieff, Balzac,
Daudet, and George Moore, and their
attitude toward music. He has a fine
and contagious enthusiasm for the later
Verdi, the turning-point in whose career
he attributes to his acquaintance with
Boito.
The essay entitled After Wagner —
What ? promises more than it gives-
Mr. Huneker answers the interrogation
with another : " Why cannot we have
the Athenian gladness and simplicity of
Mozart, with the added richness of Rich-
ard Strauss ? " And again another :
11 Why cannot we accept music without
striving to extort from it metaphysical
meanings ? " To neither question vouch-
safes he an answer. And so, as Strauss
ends his tone-poem Zarathustra with
the world-riddle unsolved, does Mr.
Huneker close his latest volume with a
question unanswered — and unanswer-
able.
Mr. Huneker as a critic of music has
the faculty of giving one his impressions
with unequivocal directness : and his im-
pressions are always worth having. He
is a suggestive writer, and in his point of
view often original. His command of a
facile pen and his feeling for vigorous
and picturesque words make his criti-
cism forceful and convincing. Even while
one is quite sure that he does not agree
with a certain extravagant statement, he
finds himself doubting and, under the
stress of the brilliant phrasing, almost
persuaded. The work of so individual
a writer is always welcome. But Mr.
Huneker should guard against a dash of
cynicism which now and then evinces it-
self. Sweetness and light are of co-
equal importance in a critic, — especially
a musical critic. Without the former
quality his work must fail of perma-
nence. Lewis M. Isaacs.
Two rather bitter and pessimistic
A History of letters from the composer
American _ . r
Music. MacUowell, recently given to
the public, have directed attention to
the quality and status of the music pro-
duced in this country. In one Mr.
MacDowell resigned the professorship
of music which he had held at Columbia,
declaring that the limitations of the cur-
riculum precluded any adequate or dig-
nified development of the study of music,
but adding that all the arts were treated
equally ill, and that the graduates of the
university were little other than barbari-
ans in their knowledge or appreciation
of aesthetics. In the other he asked with-
drawal of a composition of his from a
concert devoted to American music, on
the ground that to put forward by them-
selves musical works written by Ameri-
cans was an indignity and an injustice,
inasmuch as it implied that they were
unworthy to be presented on an equality
with the writings of other composers as
integral portions of an impartial pro-
gramme. Without pausing to discuss
whether this last point be well taken, or
whether it might not be as forcibly
pressed against a concert of Flemish,
Russian, or English music, it is depress-
ing to find a man of Mr. MacDowelPs
talent and authority maintaining ur-
gently such extreme views ; and yet one
doubts whether America be, after all, a
musical Nazareth from which no real
good is to come.
But one feels relieved and cheered
after examining Mr. Louis C. Elson's
Books New and Old.
861
volume,1 many of whose statements of
fact, incident, and personality reassure,
and whose deductions and prognostica-
tions encourage. It should, however, be
called rather an essay toward a history
than a history ; for the materials, which
have been gathered carefully, and no
doubt laboriously, are not so well coordi-
nated as to afford due proportion and
perspective. So far as there is any com-
plete conspectus of musical progress in
this country, it is quite closely confined
to New England, although the early ex-
istence of transplanted English music in
the southern colonies, the life of opera in
the French dependencies, the establish-
ment of the Philharmonic Society in New
York, and the desire for conservatories
and orchestras throughout the country
are recognized fully and fairly. Mr.
Elson rightly places religious music first
in the order of influence and develop-
ment of the science and art in America,
admitting that the real point of departure
was from New England. Prayer and
praise were associated in the minds of
the early settlers, in spite of their many
grim beliefs and the severe rigidity of
their psalmody, so that the first efforts
toward formal expression of native musi-
cal feeling naturally took the shape of
religious songs and tunes, some of which
have maintained themselves to the pre-
sent time as exemplary and still availa-
ble for public services.
The expansion of private gatherings
for practice of such vocal music — as
later for the social study of instrumental
compositions, beginning in Boston near
the end of the eighteenth century — into
strong and permanent societies is con-
sidered justly as leading to that diffusion
of musical understanding and interest
which caused the formation of educa-
tional institutions, orchestras, choruses,
and chamber-music companies.
The large and ever mooted questions of
1 The History of American Music. By Louis
C. ELSON. New York: The Macmillan Co.
1904.
folk-songs and a distinctively American
musical style or school receive chapters
to themselves ; but the discussion ends
nearly where it began, — that the abori-
ginal Indian music is difficult of preser-
vation and virtually impossible of assimi-
lation into modern composition because
of its fluctuating tonality and abnormal
progression ; and that a national fashion
of song is to be sought, if anywhere, in
the plantation melodies and " spirituals,"
which rudely and yet tenderly try to
press the emotional fervor and pathos of
the negro nature into forms borrowed or
adapted from general vocalism. Extreme
value seems here to be set upon the work of
Stephen C. Foster, who, after all, merely
created a species of song better and more
faithful in giving a graceful, lovable form
to the sentiments of slave life than did
others belonging to the same genus and
epoch.
Some divisions of the book are devoted
to composers and directors of orchestral
and vocal music, to the spread of the
opera, to the participation of women in
composition, to the present conditions
of musical education and criticism, and
to the right and wrong tendencies of the
American musical disposition, the latter
deriving chiefly from the national dis-
inclination to be serious, to move slowly,
and to consider intrinsic worth before
superficial brilliancy and material profit.
But that America has made music that
Europe has welcomed and esteemed is
proclaimed plainly and stoutly as a cheer-
ing fact.
As has been implied, the only symmet-
rically developed portions of the book
relate to Boston and its derivatives. Yet
this is probably not due to partiality,
for the author has evidently striven to be
equitable, but rather to the difficulty of
finding and collating material elsewhere.
A kindly temper prevails, comparisons
are avoided, and gentle judgments are
the rule. The style is alert, fluent, and
interesting, but qualified sometimes by a
lenity that would suit better with an
862
Books New and Old.
ephemeral chronicle than a permanent
history.
The book itself is, as Holmes once
wrote, " a very heavy quarto," bulky and
fatiguing to hold, but handsome and
legible in type, liberally and relevantly
illustrated, and has a bibliography, to-
gether with an ample and excellent
index. Howard M. Ticknor.
IT would be small praise to say that
The Moorish Mr. Scott's books 1 contain the
Europe. best account in English of the
rise and fall of Muhammadan dominion
in southwestern Europe ; for these three
well-made volumes, the result of twenty
years of study, will find few and poor
competitors in English. This is the more
remarkable when the importance of Arab
empire in Spain and Sicily is properly
estimated and the degree of influence
exercised on Mediaeval Europe by Islamic
civilization is adequately measured. Un-
fortunately, many writers have still to
realize that the influence of Asia on Eu-
rope has been greater than that of Europe
on Asia. Indeed, speaking in the broad-
est sense, the history of the world has
been chiefly the history of the inter-
course — religious, intellectual, political,
and economic — between the two conti-
nents. The most interesting, perhaps the
most important, period of this intercourse
is marked by the rise of Islam, the
double attack on Christendom by Muslim
kingdoms at both ends of the Mediter-
ranean, and the continued existence in
Europe of a Muhammadan empire which,
in the domain of arts and sciences, and
in material civilization, was long the su-
perior of any state in western Europe.
The problems arising from the intimate
contact of Latin and Semitic institutions,
and the variety of matters in which Eu-
rope was debtor to the Arab, will lead the
student far afield.
The whole story of that contact in
1 History of the Moorish Empire in Europe.
By S. P. SCOTT. 3 vols. Philadelphia: J. B.
Lippincott Co. 1904.
war and peace is presented by Mr. Scott
with panoramic effect ; and though the
method is discursive and the style at
times diffuse, the results are interesting.
After warning the reader that Muham-
mad has endured varied and for the most
part unjust treatment at the hands of
biographers, he concludes : " If the ob-
ject of religion be the inculcation of
morals, the diminution of evil, the pro-
motion of human happiness, the expan-
sion of the human intellect ; if the per-
formance of good works will avail in
that great day when mankind shall be
summoned to its final reckoning, it is
neither irreverent nor unreasonable to
admit that Muhammad was indeed an
Apostle of God." Side by side with
such praise should be set a reiterated
prejudice against Roman Christianity in
the Middle Ages. Arab culture needs
for its defense and praise no such con-
trast as is presented by an unmeasured
condemnation of the whole course of
European civilization from the eighth to
the sixteenth century. Indeed, the de-
sire to secure dramatic effect has in some
respects impaired Mr. Scott's accuracy.
For this, however, the reader is partially
prepared by an examination of the elabo-
rate but poorly arranged bibliography.
Much of the best in original and sec-
ondary sources is to be noted, but sur-
prising omissions as well as curious
inclusions are apparent. Macaulay knew
much, but his History of England can
scarcely rank as an authority on Moor-
ish Spain. These facts are indicative of
what becomes certain as doubtful ques-
tions are examined. Matters long se-
riously disputed are treated with such
confidence and such obliviousness to the
difficulties which have taxed the ablest
scholars that hesitation instinctively
arises on the part of those who are asked
to accept some of the author's conclu-
sions. Yet, when all is said and done,
this interesting and ardent if somewhat
uncritical presentation deals with events
and conditions too long neglected by
The Contributors' Club.
863
English and American students. The
ultra-Teutonic tendency of many of our
histories is perhaps partly responsible
for this neglect. We need, in fact, to
be told more frequently that Europe has
not always fronted to the Atlantic. This
Mr. Scott does most successfully.
A. L. P. D.
THE CONTRIBUTORS' CLUB.
WHAT queer variety of things we some-
Things times come across in books
Found In
Books. long undisturbed — besides
what the authors and the printers put
there ! I have just opened that delightful
book, Murray on the Origin and Growth
of the Psalms, and there stares me in the
face a number of blue prints taken by one
of my sons on the gulf -side and on the bay-
side of Galveston Island, — pictures that
bring back many reminiscences. Lovely
sea-and-cloud views some of them are,
with the clumps of tamarisk in the fore-
ground, and the beach, below the sand-
dunes on which these grow, stretching
down to the surf. These call to mind a
breeze-blown summer spent partly in that
fatal Lucas Terrace, in whose ruins the
storm of 1900 buried so many, and partly
in a tent close beside one of those jungles
of salt-cedar. Ah ! those days and nights !
The bay-side sketches are of Bremen
steamers and Galveston wharves, and
speak not so strongly to the memory.
Another book, opened at random, will
reveal a leaf or flower pressed long ago,
" in the time of the Barmecides," after
a tramp in the woods near Oxford, Mis-
sissippi, or along the banks of the Con-
garee in South Carolina, or beside the
Kinchatoonee in Georgia. One calls up
a black sluggish stream, in the reedy
thicknesses of whose margin shone forth
suddenly a gemlike flower, a full reward
for heated cheeks and dusty feet, help-
ing the dense shade of the woods to bring
coolness and rest to the youngest of the
wanderers. Another takes us back to
the fern-covered bank, to which we so
often turned our steps to search for the
earliest anemones, or to gather in the
tiny glen near it our richest treasure of
golden lady-slippers. Still another trib-
ute of our travels recalls the slow voyage
in fairy waters on tlhe gulf-coast of Flor-
ida and the wonderful seaweed forms
fished up from a coral sea-bottom.
Take in hand that bulky volume, so
seldom lifted from its shelf, and it will
open of itself at the place where was
thrust long ago the wedding invitation
of our lively and charming friend who
helped to make a Shakespeare Club in
Cuthbert, Georgia, so interesting. But
the puccoon flower we showed her, as the
earliest transport of spring in the woods
beside the mill-pond, will be found in an-
other book, — perchance in that Brown-
ing our eldest used to pore over with
such zest.
It is a bad plan to hide away precious
things thus, for our old loves so often
cease to draw us to their pages. Long
years have passed since I opened a vol-
ume of my once beloved Noctes Ambro-
siaiue. Shall I try the experiment now ?
Henry Rogers in the Eclipse of Faith
mentions the curious circumstance of a
large sum of money in bank bills being
found in a family Bible where they had
been hidden under the conviction that
that book would be unlikely ever to be
opened by any one but the secret depos-
itor. Let me not be so fond as to ima-
gine treasure in these lucubrations of Kit
North. There will be no twenty-dollar
bill found there, I warrant you : never
was there one of us so insensate as to slip
864
The Contributors' Club.
money into a book, — we spend all we get
too fast for that. But, hey ! this is a
photograph, long forgotten. Can it be
anybody's sweetheart ? I would fain
hope not, — no, not even a cousin or a
friend, let us trust ! Indeed, it is hard
to remember for whom it is meant.
Is it my Greek books you are looking
at ? It is ages since I have touched them.
Scholarship is out of fashion nowadays.
There must come a need for a new Re-
naissance before Hellenic studies will
come into vogue again. But do you ima-
gine that anything striking will be found
in these ? Let me turn the pages of
this Antigone and try a new kind of
" Sortes Vergilianae?' Sure enough !
there is a flutter of falling paper, — a
cutting from an old Times-Democrat, I
opine. It is one of the most imaginative
of Mrs. Margaret J. Preston's lyrics.
My daughter must have put it there,
besides recording the verses in her mem-
ory, for I have heard her repeat them
often. But why put them into the An-
tigone ? It was the nearest book at hand,
no doubt, and it was the merest chance
that laid our poet's pretty fancies side by
side with the tragic lines of Sophocles.
As yet I have said nothing of the mar-
ginal notes, the multitudinous scribblings,
which now disfigure and now illuminate
books. Who is not familiar with them ?
And with what different emotions do we
come upon the different sorts !
When they are the notes of scholars,
we welcome them as noteworthy, possi-
bly precious commentaries on the text. I
well remember a fine copy of Horace,
once in my possession, which had be-
longed to that eminent scholar and es-
sayist, Hugh Swinton Legare', and was
thickly strewn with notes in his hand-
writing. Alas, it is now no more, hav-
ing perished in that Galveston storm
already mentioned. I had given it to
an appreciative scholar, whose life went
out with the downfall of Lucas Terrace ;
and all his possessions were buried under
its ruins.
But, when the inscriptions on margin
or blank page of the book you have in
hand are the merest rubbish, the silly
outpourings of a fool's too ample leisure,
you fume with unuttered execrations on
his memory, or laugh loudly at his idiocy,
as the mood of the moment may move
you.
I have an old French Bible, printed
at Basle in 1760, which has some inter-
esting matter inscribed on the blank pages
of front and back. One of these inscrip-
tions runs thus, — I give the spelling of
the original, —
"Cette petite Bible est a moi Jean
Bert Si je la viens a perdre Celui qui la
Trouvera qui aije la bonte' de me la Ren-
dre je lui donneray une Raisonable Trou-
viere' [evidently a provincial word sig-
nifying ' finder's reward,' perhaps ori-
ginally trouveure] car c'est un Livre pour
me conssoller et pour m'aprandre a quiter
le vice et m'atacher a la vertti Cesser de
mal faire apprandre a bien faire fuir le
mal et m atacher au bien quiter lidolatrie
du monde pour m'atacher au pur Service
de Dieu."
At the back of the book in another
hand and in paler ink, now almost illegi-
ble, are rhymed verses that constitute a
confession of faith, the first line being: —
" J'abjure de bon coeur le Pape et son Empire,"
showing the writer to have been as
sound a Huguenot as Jean Bert, the
first owner of the book.
Sometimes one has surprises. In the
textbook of one of my students I once
hit upon a capital caricature of myself.
A BRILLIANT Irishman of Boston says
Educated that New Yorkers accuse him
Mlspronnn- , , . .,, , . ,
ciatlons. of speaking with an " educated
mispronunciation." The phrase char-
acterizes excellently a kind of error of
speech which is different from vulgar
error in that it is proud of itself : vulgar
error does not recognize itself as error,
and when it does arrive at self-conscious-
ness it is heartily ashamed.
No one objects to the mistakes of an
The Contributors' Club.
865
educated person ; they do much to make
him human. Often, too, the cultivated
person wears his mistakes with a kind of
distinction, just as a well-bred body car-
ries with grace an ill-fitting garment.
But most odious is the cultivated error
that sets itself up — in print — as crite-
rion for the mob. What intellectual snob-
bery ! What narrow provincial urban-
ity ! Some months ago I read a paper
in one of the magazines by a cultivated
English lady on what she called, with irri-
tating assumption, " the trick of educa-
tion." Her underlying thought was that
between two forms equally correct, the
educated person chooses the better. That
is an old and obvious idea which I have
read in about fifteen textbooks on rhet-
oric. And because it is old and obvious
and still remembered, it is a good idea.
My regards to the lady for her nice plea
for fine distinctions ! But, alas, she falls
into the pitfall which was digged, by
what Thomas Hardy would call the
Spirit of Irony, for the aloof and high-
stepping few. Why should she crystal-
lize as correct and preferable downright
blunders, of which her particular social
class happens to be uniformly guilty ?
With easy assurance she informs us
that " girl " does not rhyme with " whirl "
and " pearl " and " curl." She is a poet,
and she ought to know better. But no,
she expects us to give up our beautiful
lyric about the little girl who did not dress
her hair in pompadour. How, then, are
we to pronounce " girl " ? Listen ! " He
who says ' girl ' to rhyme with ' pearl '
has less the trick of education than he
who says ' girl ' with the vowel of
' care.' " " The trick of education seems
indeed to be fond of this vowel — the
vowel of ' care ' and ' girl.' " It must
be a low-down trick. The vowel of
" girl " and " care," a long " a," is pro-
nounced like the long " o " in " teeth,"
and only a few English people can get it.
A little more education (say, in a good
university) and a little less " trick of edu-
cation " would tell this lady that the " ir "
in " whirl " and the " ir " in " girl " are
the same. A better ear for language,
and some study of the physiology of
phonetics, would show her that as a plain
physical fact of vocal utterance the weak
vowels become identical before " r."
" R " is a sort of cotton fibre sound which
muffles distinctions. Assertion for asser-
tion, by the facts of phonetics, by the in-
eluctable physics of sound, " girl " must
rhyme with " whirl " and " pearl " and
" curl." And so it does in all the poets.
If there is a possible better pronuncia-
tion of " girl," it is that which I have
heard from the strong throats of Scots-
men, who say the word exactly as it is
spelled, " girl." It is difficult to manage ;
you begin as if you were to speak of the
gill of a fish, and then stuff in between
the " i " and the " 1 " a good hoarse " r."
This pronunciation is historical ; it will
show you how to pronounce the word
" girles " in Chaucer. But here, again,
though we have a more reasonable " pre-
ference," the natural physiology of sound
forbids.
The same lady prefers " inerrplicable,"
" inc&ssoluble," "inacceptable," to " in-
expfo'cable," " indissoluble," and " unac-
ceptable." In the first two cases she is
right, except that it is not a question of
preference. The ordy correct pronun-
ciation is " inexplicable " and " indisso-
luble." In the third case she is em-
balming two errors. In the first place,
the word " inacceptable " does not ex-
ist ; she means " unacceptable." In the
second place, it is accented only on the
antepenult, and no other accentuation is
correct. So she is preferring something
which is quite wrong.
Cultivated people are delightful when
they mispronounce ; they give humbler
folk a comforting sense of equality.
When, however, persons of culture insist
on their errors, they are irritating. One
of the best readers and speakers I know
prides himself on saying " middiff " for
" midwife." He fancies that the least
usual thing is the best, and he is beauti-
866
The Contributors' Club.
fully misled in this case by " housewife,"
which may be pronounced " hussiff " if
one prefers. The pronunciation " mid-
diff " does not exist. I have no quarrel
with his error. My quarrel is with his
persisting that the only right way to
pronounce the word is less preferable.
In the same way he prefers " cumred "
to " commr&d." He has a right to his
preference ; but once he cried out in
alarm because I said " commrad," which
is also correct. His error in setting
down as wrong what he does not prefer
is pernicious.
Another critic and philosopher of my
acquaintance is irritated by the flat " a "
of the Westerner, which sounds like the
slap of a shingle against a picket fence.
Swinging to the other extreme, my friend
carefully pronounces " man " like the
German " mann." Oh, blunderer ! Oh,
earless one ! To talk like that and pre-
tend to give lectures on poetry !
The comic papers have already made
ridiculous the man who speaks of
" chawming weathah." And even cul-
tivated people would pronounce " r " if
they could. In the east of America, the
letter is obsolete before consonants and
at the end of a word. In the west it is
multiplied to the vibrations of a thou-
sand telegraph wires. Who is left in the
land that can pronounce " carthorse " ?
Well, no matter about that ; it is be-
side my theme. My protest is aimed at
the chests of persons who call themselves
educated, and boast their blunders as
part of their education. Consider the
lilies ! Listen to the mocking-baird !
Oh, temporary morals ! " The little
gayrl refused the unACceptable mann."
Would not that make even a Bostonian
go west of Worcester and rejoice in the
shrill purring of the Chicago " r " ?
Would not that sentence render even
tolerable the New Yorker's " little goil
who oiled hoy coils with hair-oil, and
watched the little boid sitting on the
coib-stone " ?
Let us cleave to our preferences, but
let us not prefer anything that is posi-
tively incorrect. Above all, let us not
try to reduce our preferences for what is
wrong into law and prophecy for the
Common People.
NoTHiNGbut that awful inductive habit
Disagreeable W°uld 6V6r have led me to
People I have furnish such a title as this.
Known Who r^, • •> ..
have Loved J-he inductive process is not
natural to me, and I always
feel a little mean after using it. I would
much prefer to go on the rest of my
days in my early, easy-going, and naive
theory that all who love plants must be
lovely, and to say of each exception to
the rule that it did not count. But of
late the exceptions have become so tur-
bulent and numerous that they must be
reckoned with and brought into some
sort of order. Having for some time
been applying a process of induction,
severe induction, to my earlier creed, I
now venture forth my growing doubts,
in the hope — probably entertained by
most skeptics — that some one will prove
them unfounded.
I own up that, though I have gone on
assuming the loveliness of plant-lovers, I
have always stood a little in awe of peo-
ple who were specially successful with
plants. Perhaps I ought to say, rather,
that I always supposed it to be awe, for
of late I have come to feel it rather a
subtle instinct of self-preservation which
warned me off their borders. I set down
also the fact that of the half-dozen plant
experts who immediately occur to my
mind there is not one in whose presence
I could ever become what you would call
rollicking, though I do not know that I
ever put it to myself in just that way
before. For years my first and conven-
tional mental reaction on seeing a win-
dow full of geraniums in our village
would be that some choice soul dwelt
behind them. Yet there was a strange
joylessness about the discovery, which I
now realize to have been due mainly to
a subconscious association of the best ge-
ranium windows with the largest amount
The Contributors' Club.
867
of gossip. To this day, a window of ge-
raniums will give me an unpleasant feel-
ing of being watched.
My facts are not all in yet, but from
such as come to me I form the conclusion
that those who get on best with plants
find it, as a rule, rather difficult to keep
on good terms with the highest forms of
organic matter. You can snip geraniums
and they will not protest, but human
beings on the whole, while confessing
many useless elements in themselves, pre-
fer to part with them in a manner less
peremptory than would satisfy your flow-
er expert. Is it just possible that some
folks take to plants as the only living
thing that never seems to answer back ?
Something of tartness certainly flavors
the communion of the average horticul-
turist with his kind. A boy falls enrap-
tured of all kinds of people, — hostlers,
sailors, carpenters, or tramps, — but I re-
call only one instance of a boy forming an
intimacy with a gardener, while even that
instance now lies so dimly in my mind
that I cannot vouch for it. I recall that
in my boyhood the citizens of our neigh-
borhood who had gardens, and worked
in them evenings, were always connected
in my mind with something acrid and
suspicious. In all this I am not unmind-
ful of Professor Child and his roses, and
I still celebrate in my soul the memory
of one plant-lover in our village, whose
gift to our household was always that of
heliotrope and cream, a gift the remem-
brance of which softens all my reflections
of plant experts, making me still hopeful
of them no matter how much I may suffer
from them. But these are exceptions.
If I were to put in a general law the
result of my experiences, I could not do
so better than by imitating Charles
Kingsley's famous summing up of John
Henry Newman's attitude toward truth,
and saying " that amiability is not and
on the whole ought not to be a prime
requisite of people who are devoted to
flowers."
Of all people, I should have looked to
garden folks as those from whom a gen-
ial and encouraging humanity was most
to be expected. But all this belongs
back in my deductive days. Now I
might approach the office of a capitalist
with reasonable expectations of a natural
and human half-hour, or the sanctum of
a scholar or high ecclesiastic without
undue awe, or even the neighborhood of
a statesman and yet feel calmly about
it, as if he were nothing but a human be-
ing raised to a slightly higher power ;
but I should keep an appointment with
one who had had success with small fruits
or hardy plants (and written a book
about it) with most of my natural emo-
tions in full retreat inward. Not even
the scientific expert would produce in
me the same dread. True, he knows
enough to overwhelm me ; but there is
usually something so delightfully dun-
derheaded about the scientific expert ! I
feel as a rule so sorry for him to think
that, with so much greater materials at
hand than I ever have, he can draw such
limited conclusions from it all ! Though
he would love to make a great broad-
chested affirmation he never quite does
it, and thus he appeals to my sympathy.
I sort of love him and like to be with
him.
Perhaps these doubts are corroding
my moral nature in thus making me
skeptical toward the goodness which once
I was so willing to take on trust. Once
you get started with distrust, it reaches
out into regions where you never dreamed
it would go, for here am I after years
of familiarity with the Soliloquy in a
Spanish Cloister, — in which it never oc-
curred to me to feel anything but disgust
at that brute of a monk who went about
snipping the blooms from Brother Law-
rence's plants, — here am I trying to find
excuses for the irate brother, and asking
myself whether it was not just possible
that plants were only Brother Lawrence's
way of being disagreeable in the cloister.
Let no one suppose that I hate plants.
I am trying my best to dare to love
868
The Contributors' Club.
them. What I rebel against is the hope-
less feeling of inferiority begotten in me
by these minor nature-lovers in connec-
tion with the very things which I hoped
would make me feel equal and open and
genial. A little crabbed by nature, I
had looked toward gardens and garden
books as a freeing influence, perhaps the
last one left to me, and I am disap-
pointed. I do not carry a chip on my
shoulder in this world, but have been
willing to be inferior in a hundred dif-
ferent ways. The capitalist does but
represent to me the doctrine of election
in a way to which I am accustomed, and
I never complain of unequal wealth.
The four hundred rather interest me
than otherwise. But when any one tries
to make me feel inferior by means of
mignonette and roses and lilacs, I rise
up in indignation. There 's Elizabeth,
to wit, and her German Garden. When
have I ever felt so much like a worm
and no man, so scornfully rejected as
unfit for the fellowship of flowers, — and
pretty nearly everything else, — as after
reading that? I could readily believe
that part of her story in which her gar-
dener himself appeared one day on the
scene, gone stark mad, and I thought of
what a well-known historical scholar had
told me of the French Revolution, that
it was not so much poverty and taxes as
it was scorn which brought on the final
disaster. A thousand minor French
Revolutions burned in my breast. Sup-
posing, in a general way, that I had some
affinity for flowers, here was my right
called in question by the One Only
Lover of Plants and Gardens. Between
the temptation to assert my rights and
the inclination to turn a floral anarchist,
and never again to believe in any one
who loved plants, my being was divided
against itself. For sheer supercilious-
ness, the kind that brought on the French
Revolution, commend me not to the plu-
tocrat, nor the critic, nor the four hun-
dred, but to the lover of plants.
Much of this ardor for flowers seems
to me of the sort spoken of by Amiel
when, describing some delight, he says,
" when once the taste for it is set up the
mind takes a special and keen delight
in it, for one finds in it
Son bien premifcrement, puis le d^dain d'autrui,
and it is pleasant to one's vanity not to
be of the same opinion as the common
herd."
But my earlier assumption comes back
to me. The lovers of gardens ought to
be lovely, and perhaps there is a way,
after all. In spite of the fact that on
those evenings when we as a family feel
particularly superior to the rest of the
world we always select for reading aloud
one of the recent volumes on gardens, I
say to myself that the soul of man — and
woman — has a long time to run, and
may yet grow so accustomed to the glory
of the plant as to dare to become more
agreeable about it. Then, with a new
tenderness running through my soul I
say also, " Who knows what has driven
these people to horticulture ? If we knew
all we might forgive all." Mr. Birrell
has told us how despair of ever settling
such difficult matters as Apostolical Suc-
cession and the influence of Newman have
driven some men to collecting butterflies
and beetles. If we but knew what un-
kindlier and more difficult issues they had
fled from we might forgive all to these
caustic brothers and sisters who own
gardens and have had success with small
fruits. Let us lift up our heads, then, all
of us who have for the past five years
felt so inferior just because we could
boast of nothing but an old-fashioned,
easy-going love for plants, or could say
nothing of Wild Animals Who Have
Helped Us. Let us be grateful that
life has been so normal with us that we
have never been driven to such devices
as these.
THE tribulations of the woman lecturer
Confessions are many ; and the first is
of a Woman , . Tirr, , ., ,
Lecturer. her pursuit. VY ny should she
speak in public, if she dislikes the occu-
The Contributors' Club.
869
pation ? asks the Sensible Reader. Sen-
sible Reader, the answer would carry us
far afield into psychological mysteries.
Suffice it to say that even a woman may
be so interested in the subjects of her love
that she cannot refrain from telling other
people about them. Moreover, so extraor-
dinarily prevalent in this queer country
of ours is the desire of being lectured
to, that the many women beset by appeals
to speak may almost say, in the immortal
words of Lady Laura Etchingham, "It
is expected of us." Be these things as
they may, one may shudder, yet accept ;
one may long for the Ingle and the
Stocking, yet be fated to the Platform,
the Glass of Water, the Floral Tribute,
and the Attentive Throng.
Dim reports I have indeed heard from
regions afar of " platform women " who
gloried in their shame. There are other
women, perhaps a number of them, who
yearn toward platform and publicity as
toward an unattained Paradise. One
such I met once, — a large lady, of so-
norous voice. " I know," she said to
me, with resonant emphasis, " that my
proper sphere would be the Platform.
Why else did the Lord give me such an
organ ? I could fill a hall of ten thousand
people with this organ. The only trouble
with me is " — she sighed with deep re-
gret — "I think and I think, and I can-
not seem to find anything in particular
that I could say." " Would that all pub-
lic speakers, men and women, were so
dowered with self - knowledge ! " I ex-
claimed inwardly ; but I mused in sadness
on the perversity of the little imps who
withheld the longed - for joy from this
deep-throated lady, while they forced
my shrinking self before the footlights !
One, at least, of these feminine vic-
tims — or tyrants — of the public, —
whichever you choose to consider them,
— suffers unspeakable things when she
lectures, from the constant presence of
a certain Auditor. Whether she face a
Woman's Club or a College audience, a
Charity Conference, or a University Ex-
tension meeting, this Auditor is there.
He is a burly man, of not ungenial aspect,
in brown coat of antiquated cut, and a
snuffy, crooked wig. At one point or
another of the address she catches sight
of him ; terribly often it is when an
emotional climax has been reached, and
the flushed lecturer, pausing in her flow
of words, feels a little tingle return upon
her from the hushed, vibrating audience.
At such a sweet moment as this — for
that the Woman Lecturer has her sweet
moments I attempt not to deny — that
Auditor rises ; his gruff if ghostly tones
break in familiar words upon the silence :
" Sir," — he always remarks, — though
sometimes no Sirs are present, — " Sir,
a woman speaking in public is like a dog
standing upon its hind legs ; the thing
is very badly done, but the wonder is
that it is done at all." Shall I confess
further ? I am tormented on the plat-
form — doubtless from the hypnotic sug-
gestion conveyed in these words — by
the phantom presence of the little dog to
whom my Auditor refers. He is always
a black and tan, with one yellow ear.
The inevitable desk and frequent floral
decorations conceal him from the audi-
ence ; but I see him. He presses close
to my skirts, he rears his tiny figure
with mincing grace, he dances precari-
ously about, accenting my periods, and
occasionally when my eloquence flags I
behold him with horror dropping crest-
fallen upon his hind feet. Worst of all,
miserable and disconcerting fact, his
little red jaws follow the motions of my
own. Tell me, O my sister lecturers, are
you similarly afflicted ? Tell me, O Sen-
sible Reader, may not this be called a
tribulation ?
In the presence of this ghostly accom-
paniment all minor inconveniences fade
away. Yet they are many. Would you
learn to know human nature, O ye who
do not lecture, put yourselves as speakers
at the disposal of a Cause. Not that the
knowledge you acquire will be wholly
unpleasant. Kindly arrangements will
870
The Contributors' Club.
often be made for your comfort; you
will even, I admit, gain as lecturer a
hidden joy in a singularly happy sense
of fellowship with your brother men. Yet,
if I mistake not, you will have occasion
greatly to marvel at the expectations of
the public. Hold yourself ready to at-
tend a Federation five hundred miles
away, — expenses paid one way, no other
perquisites, — for the privilege of occu-
pying fifteen minutes in presenting your
world-wide theme, — I have even known
the limit to be ten. " In order to secure
variety," says the note of invitation, "the
other addresses of the evening will be
upon the Theory of Mental Healing, and
the Best Novels of the Past Six Weeks."
— Or, it may be, you will be asked to
betake yourself in midwinter to a distant
village on the Northern seacoast, where
a Woman's Club has just been formed :
" The Club is not able to offer any fees,
but the ladies do so much want to hear
you. They wonder if the offer of a
week's board at Mrs. Brown's would
not be acceptable to you ? That would
be a very nice arrangement for them, as
the lecture has sometimes to be deferred
two or three days, since the Club does
not try to meet in stormy weather."
But why continue ? Many a tribula-
tion turns into joy when one has a sense
of humor. And then, there are the
compensating Tributes ! Space forbids
me to cull from my choice collection
more than two : " I don't know how to
thank you for your lecture," said an ef-
fusive hearer to me once. " It was
simply the most eloquent mosaic I ever
listened to." Better than this, best and
most heartening of all, was my experi-
ence with a Lady who lives forever in
the family annals as my Disciple from
Nebraska. She was portly and of ma-
jestic mien, and throughout my talk she
fixed me with her eye. The lecture
over, — I remember that it was a lec-
ture on Shelley, — she made her im-
pressive way through the circle of sym-
pathetic people who always press up to
the speaker with comment and question.
The circle opened before her ; with large
gesture she clasped my hand, and gazed
on me in silence. A tear welled up in
her eye. I returned her gaze, spell-
bound ; the others waited ; would she -
never speak? At last the words came,
slow and loud : —
" In the name of your suffering sis-
ters of Nebraska, I give you thanks,"
she said.
I gasped. I know now that I might
have said, " Thank Shelley," but at the
time this did not occur to me. Beside,
she was going on.
" And now," she continued with fer-
vor, " still in the name of your sisters,
I ask you a further favor. I ask you
for data."
The lecturer is accustomed to be
asked for anything and everything in
the way of intellectual wares : " I shall
be happy if I have any that can be of
service," I replied obligingly. " Data
on what ? "
My Disciple paused, glancing at the
listening group : —
" Data on any subject which you can
give will be a boon, indeed, to your sis-
ters in Nebraska."
I caught a twinkle in the eye of a
friend, and was lost. Hastily composing
my features, I gave the lady from Ne-
braska an appointment, — she would n't
go without one, — and escaped.
The next morning, when she was an-
nounced, I went down to find her stand-
ing, arms on hips, gravely scrutinizing
an engraving of Mona Lisa. She turned
to me, the light of appreciation in her
eyes.
"I call her plain" she remarked,
with cheery accent. " Now, how about
those data?"
I gave them to her. I do not remem-
ber what they were, but I recall that
she went away in deep content, the dusty
reports of fifteen reform movements
clasped ardently, among other matter,
to her capacious bosom. I have not
The Contributors' Club.
871
heard from her since, and she sent me
no copy of the paper, which, as I dis-
covered, she was proposing to edit for
the benefit of the women of her native
state.
EVEN chemistry, I am told, is not so
Contempora- exact a science as to exclude
neousness. myStery. Does it not teach
that certain widely different compounds
are products, in the last analysis, of the
same elements, combined in the same
proportions ? The process of combina-
tion, — the electric affinities of atoms, —
there is the riddle !
I was reminded of these strange con-
tradictions by reading, in a recent At-
lantic, a review of certain books of verse ;
or, rather, by reading certain generaliz-
ations to which the critic's subject leads
him. With all the world's masterpieces
of poetry to work with, that reviewer's
mind evolves a conclusion which satisfies
him as logical and just; and here is my
humbly anonymous intellect producing,
with exactly the same materials, a dia-
metrically opposite result.
He has been dealing with certain " con-
trasting experiments in poetic drama."
The theme of one of these dramas, he
says, " has the inestimable advantage of
possessing already a hold upon the im-
agination of the general ; an advantage
which great dramatic poets from .3£schy-
lus to Shakespeare have sedulously pur-
sued, and which the best of their suc-
cessors down to Mr. Stephen Phillips
have continued to pursue ; " whereas the
author of the other play " is actually try-
ing to interpret the present moment in
blank verse," — an effort which compels
the bewildered critic " to think there is
a real incongruity between their sub-
stance and their form." And at last we
find him laying down the law thus : —
" No great dramatic poetry, no great
epical poetry, has ever dealt with con-
temporary conditions. Only the austere
processes of time can precipitate the
multitude of immediate facts into the
priceless residuum of universal truth.
The great dramatists have turned to the
past for their materials, not of choice,
but of necessity. Here and there in the
dark backward and abysm of time, some
human figure, some human episode, is
seen to have weathered the years, and to
have taken on certain mysterious attri-
butes of truth ; and upon this foundation
the massive structure of heroic poetry
is builded."
But surely the contemporaneousness of
all great art is a truth too important to be
at the mercy of any one's experiments.
The masterpieces of every art — I ven-
ture to generalize even more broadly
than the reviewer — have been the com-
plete, the ultimate expression of the age
which produced them, never in any sense
an echo of any other. They express the
universal truth through the medium of
the thought, the feeling of their own time,
and they owe nothing to the past except
the basic materials, — the stones and
mortar, the words and the singing voice,
the vast background of nature and hu-
man nature, the dreams, the faith, the
aspirations, which belong to all the ages,
though they take widely varying forms
in their progress through the centuries.
Of course, his protest is obvious:
" However expressive of its age the mas-
terpiece may be," he will say, "it turns
to the past for its themes." I answer
that in a restricted and superficial sense
it does sometimes, and sometimes not,
but that in a larger and deeper sense it
never does. He will confront me then
with instances : What of Hamlet, Mac-
beth, Lear ? What of GEdipus, the Pro-
metheus Bound, Faust? What of Par-
adise Lost, yea, of the Iliad itself, whose
heroes lived and fought centuries before
Homer sang?
But in eveiy one of these instances, I
contend, the theme was strictly contem-
poraneous, and the characters were the
imaginative embodiments of the feeling
of the poet's time. Milton's theme was
the Puritan faith, and his God, Satan,
Adam and Eve were most wonderfully
872
The Contributors' Club.
his neighbors. Homer was the creator
of Achilles, Agamemnon, Hector, — yes,
of the Trojan war itself ; he made the
whole epic history out of a contest less
poetically promising than the present
Russo-Japanese campaign, and in doing
it he made use of all the religious im-
agery and significance with which his
high-reaching imagination, and that of
his compatriots, enriched the bareness of
the theme ; in short, he " dealt with con-
temporary conditions." Would the re-
viewer contend that Shakespeare found
in Hamlet or in Lear a human figure
which had " weathered the years and
taken on certain mysterious attributes
of truth " ? If he does, let him strip his
mind completely of these great tragedies,
and look up the childish old wives' tales
which served as the poet's point of de-
parture. Shakespeare took a hint from
some foolish ditty ; from that point he
changed plot and characters to suit the
convenience of his strictly modern pur-
pose, to make his work express his own
feeling, his own time.
I might ask him about certain other
masterpieces of art in. which the mate-
rials, as well as the general theme and
spirit, are of the most absolute contem-
poraneousness. What, for example, of
the Book of Job and the Hebrew proph-
ecies? What of the Parthenon, of the
Hermes of Praxiteles? What of the
Gothic cathedrals, of Don Quixote, of
Moliere's comedies, of Velasquez' por-
traits ? What of Dante, whose Beatrice
and Francesca he did not find in that
"dark backward and abysm of time"
where our critic — and so many others,
alas ! — would locate the treasury of art ?
For us, but not for the mighty Floren-
tine, these ladies, and other people, his
contemporaries, have " weathered the
years and taken on certain mysterious
attributes of truth." But it was Dante
who gave them to time and men's hearts,
and all that has been said about them
since — even to the well-meaning efforts
of Mr. Stephen Phillips himself — has
been but echoes of echoes.
Never, with any great poet, was his
theme " remote " and " aloof " from his
own time. Never has he dealt with any-
thing else but " contemporary condi-
tions." It is only the minor poet who
declares himself " the idle singer of an
empty day," who finds his age prosaic,
and delves forever in the past of old ro-
mance, and so necessarily becomes more
and more remote, more and more atten-
uated, in his art. Many a clever and
promising poet has gone that way : Mr.
Yeats is rapidly taking it ; even Mr.
Moody is in danger, — may the kind
fates turn him back into higher, if
rougher, paths ! Mr. Phillips has never
given evidence of an original or modern
mind, but he does not keep his gait along
the flowery, artificial path of his choice,
— his strut becomes more and more
stilted, and his instrument gets out of
tune.
The academic temperament which
speaks in this reviewer and in many
another critic strikes at the vitality of
modern art. True, such strokes cannot
quite be fatal, because no great poet will
stop for any critic. But the poet may
be cruelly hampered, heavily impeded,
by such misdirected efforts of his con-
temporaries ; he may be compelled to
spend much of his time and energy in
warding off blows. His joyousness may
be baffled and whipped into melancholy ;
his clear vision may be clouded with bit-
terness. It is much easier for an artist
to pluck flowers along the wayside than
to labor in the vineyard, especially when
a thousand voices are pleading for the
flowers. But the flowers wither in his
hands, and only the grapes produce the
wine of life. Where should our poets
be?
AP
2
A8
v.93
The Atlantic monthly
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE
CARDS OR SLIPS FROM THIS POCKET
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARY
r>; >;.7-T~'
>-> >
>
) >
> , £> ,'J
•>£> > "» '
> v >
>> ^>,
» •
• >>
> > :>•
> >«* '
^> > >>
> > ri>^?
^ -• -. > T
> •' \
1 >
-> ~y&f>
l -•; A ?
o
? •• ,
'