(logo)
(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections

Search: Advanced Search

Anonymous User (login or join us)Upload
See other formats

Full text of "Bedouins; Mary Garden, Debussy, Chopin or the circus, Botticelli, Poe, Brahmsody, Anatole France, Mirbeau, Caruso on wheels, Calico cats, The artistic temperament; Idols and ambergris; with The supreme sin, Grindstones, A masque of music, and The vision malefic"

LIBRARY 

UNIVERSITY OF 
CALIFORNIA 
SANTA CRUZ 





. 



XF 



BY JAMES HUNEKER 

MEZZOTINTS IN MODERN MUSIC (1889) 

CHOPIN: THE MAN AND HIB MUSIC (iwo) 

MELOMANIACS (1902) 

OVERTONES (1904) 

ICONOCLASTS: A BOOK OF DRAMATISTS (1906) 

VISIONARIES (1905) 

EGOISTS: A BOOK OF SUPERMEN (1909) 

PROMENADES OF AN IMPRESSIONIST (1910) 

FRANZ LISZT. ILLUSTRATED (1911) 

THE PATHOS OF DISTANCE (1912) 

NEW COSMOPOLIS (1915) 

IVORY APES AND PEACOCKS (1915) 

UNICORNS (1917) 

BEDOUINS (1920) 

In Preparation 
STEEPLEJACK. TWO VOLUMES 

CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS 



BEDOUINS 




From a photograph by De Meyer 

MARY GARDEN HERSELF 



BEDOUINS 



MARY GARDEN, DEBUSSY, 

CHOPIN OR THE CIRCUS, BOTTICELLI, POE, BRAHMSODY, 
ANATOLE FRANCE, MIRBEAU, CARUSO ON WHEELS, 

CALICO CATS, THE ARTISTIC TEMPERAMENT; 

IDOLS AND AMBERGRIS; WITH THE SUPREME SIN, 

GRINDSTONES, A MASQUE OF MUSIC, AND 

THE VISION MALEFIC 



JAMES HUNEKER 



WITH VARIOUS PORTRAITS OF MARY GARDEN IN 
OPERATIC COSTUME 



NEW YORK 

CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS 
1920 



COPYRIGHT, 1920, BY 
CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS 

Published February, 19.20 



COPYRIGHT, W9, BY THE NEW YORK TIMES CO. 

COPYRIGHT, 1918, BY THE ESS ESS PUBLISHING CO. 

COPYRIGHT, 1917, BY THE SUN PRINTING & PUBLISHING ASSN. 




PS 

Z044 

H4 

B4 



THIS BOOK OF BEDOUINS 
IS DEDICATED 

"A la tres-belle, a la trs-bonne, la trs-chere." 



"J'aime mieux le d6sert, je retourne chez les Beclouins 
qui sont libres . . . ." 

Gustave Flaubert. 

"The Bedouins camp within Pharaoh's palace walls, 
and the old war-ship is given over to the rats." 

Robert Louis Stevenson. 



CHAPTER 



PAGE 



CONTENTS 

PART I MARY GARDEN 

I. SUPERWOMAN 3 

II. INTIMATE 15 

III. THE BABY, THE CRITIC, AND THE GUITAR 21 

IV. INTERPRETER 3<> 

V. MLISANDE AND DEBUSSY 45 

VI. THE ARTISTIC TEMPERAMENT .... 53 

VII. THE PASSING OF OCTAVE MIRBEAU . . 64 

VIII. ANARCHS AND ECSTASY 73 

IX. PAINTED Music 8l 

X. POE AND His POLISH CONTEMPORARY . 94 

XI. GEORGE LUKS 6 

XII. CONCERNING CALICO CATS 118 

XIII. CHOPIN OR THE CIRCUS? 125 

XIV. CARUSO ON WHEELS 134 

XV. SING AND GROW VOICELESS 144 

XVI. ANATOLE FRANCE: THE LAST PHASE . .154 

XVII. A MASQUE OF Music 164 

vii 



CONTENTS 
PART //IDOLS AND AMBERGRIS 

CHAPTER PAGE 

I. THE SUPREME SIN 177 

II. BROTHERS-IN-LAW 201 

III. GRINDSTONES 216 

IV. VENUS OR VALKYR? 225 

V. THE CARDINAL'S FIDDLE 247 

VI. RENUNCIATION 256 

VII. THE VISION MALEFIC . 261 



Vlll 



ILLUSTRATIONS 

Mary Garden Herself ....... Frontispiece 

PACING PAGE 

Rosina Galli 24 

Mary Garden as M61isande 34 

Mary Garden as Monna Vanna 38 

Mary Garden as Salome 78 

Rosina Galli as the Princess in "Le Coq d'Or" . 140 



PART I 
MARY GARDEN 



SUPERWOMAN 

LA BEAUTfi 

"Je suis belle, 6 mortels! comme un reve de pierrc, 
Et mon sein, ou chacun s'est meurtri tour a tour, 
Est fait pour inspirer au poete un amour 
fiternel et meut, ainsi, que la matiere." 

Charles Baudelnire. 

THAT little girl down Boston way, who had 
mastered William James and Boris Sidis before 
she was in her teens, behaved badly one after- 
noon. Possibly it was the sultry weather, or 
growing pains in the psychic sphere, of course 
or, perhaps, it may have been due to the re- 
flexes from prolonged attention to the Freudian 
psycho-analysis and the significance of Twilight 
Sleep; but whatever the cause, that precocious 
child flew off her serene handle and literally 
' 'sassed" the entire household. The tantrum 
over she afterward described it as a uric-acid 
storm and order reigning once more in Bach 
Bay, she was severely interrogated by her male 
parent as to the whys and wherefores of her 
singular deviation from accustomed glacial in- 
tellectual objectivity. Her answer was in the 
proper key: "My multiple personalities failed to 
3 



BEDOUINS 

co-ordinate. Hence the distressing lack of cen- 
tripetal functioning." She was immediately for- 
given. Multiple personalities are to blame for 
much in this vale of tears; that is, if you are 
unlucky or lucky enough to be possessed of the 
seven devils of psychology. 

Mary Garden was, no doubt, a naughty little 
girl in her time. That she climbed trees, fought 
boys twice her size, stuck out her tongue at 
pious folk, scandalized her parents, and tore 
from the heads of nice girls handfuls of hair, I 
am sure. Hedda Gabler thus treated gentle 
Thea Elvstad in the play. But was this demon 
Mary aware of her multiple personalities? Of 
her complexes? Her art fusion is such perfect 
synthesis. Subconscious is nowadays an excuse 
for the Original Sin with which we are saddled 
by theologians. 

Well, one bad turn deserves another, and we 
may easily picture the wild Scottish thistle de- 
fiantly shrugging shoulders at law and order. 
She did not analyze her Will-to-Raise-Merry- 
Hell. No genius of her order ever does. There 
had been signs and omens. Her mother before 
her birth had dreamed wonderful dreams; 
dreamed and prayed that she might become a 
singer. But even maternal intuition could not 
have foreseen such a swan triumphantly swim- 
ming through the troubled waters of life. A 
swan, did I say? A condor, an eagle, a peacock, 
a nightingale, a panther, a society dame, a gal- 
lery of moving-pictures, a siren, an indomitable 
4 



MARY GARDEN 

fighter, a human woman with a heart as big as 
a house, a lover of sport, an electric personality, 
and a canny Scotch lassie who can force from 
an operatic manager wails of anguish because of 
her close bargaining over a contract; in a word, 
a Superwoman. 

My dear friend and master, the late Remy de 
Gourmont, wrote that man differs from his 
fellow animals he didn't say "lower" because 
of the diversity of his aptitudes. Man is not 
the only organism that shows multiple person- 
alities; even in plant life pigmentation and the 
power of developing new species prove that our 
vaunted superiorities are only relative. I may 
refer you to the experiments of Hugo de Vries 
at the Botanical Gardens, Amsterdam, where 
the grand old Dutch scientist presented me with 
sixteen-leaf clover naturally developed, and 
grown between sunset and dawn; also an eve- 
ning primrose ^Eonthera Lamarckiana which 
shoots into new flowers. Multiple personalities 
again. In the case of Mary Garden we call her 
artistic aptitudes "the gift of versatility." All 
distinguished actresses have this serpent-like 
facility of shedding their skin and taking on a 
fresh one at will. She is Cleopatra with 
"serpent and scarab for sign" or Melisande, 
Phryne, or Monna Vanna; as Thais she is both 
saint and courtesan, her Salome breeds horror; 
and in the simplicities of Jean the Juggler of 
Notre Dame a Mary Garden, hitherto sub- 
merged, appears: tender, boyish, sweet, fantastic; 
5 



BEDOUINS 

a ray of moonshine has entered his head and 
made of him an irresponsible yet irresistibly 
charming youth. 

Not without warrant is Karma believed in by 
people whose imagination cannot be penned be- 
hind the bars of Now. Before to-day was yester- 
day, and to traverse that Eternal Corridor of 
Time has been the fate of mankind. The Eternal 
Return rather say, the Eternal Recommence- 
ment mad as it seems, is not to be made mock 
of. It is always the same pair of eyes that peer 
through windows opening on infinity. What the 
Karmas of Mary Garden? In spirit-land what 
avatars! Is she the reincarnation of that 
Phryne of the "splendid scarlet sins," or the 
Faustine who crowded into a moment the mad- 
ness of joy and crime; or the recrudescence of 
a Sapho who turned her back on the Leuca- 
dian promontory, turned from the too mascu- 
line Phaon and sought her Anactoria, sought 
and wooed her with lyric sighs; has she recap- 
tured, this extraordinary Mary of Aberdeen, the 
soul of Aspasia, who beguiled Pericles and 
artistic Athens with the sinuous irony of the 
serpent; and Gismonda, Louise, and Violetta, 
all those subtle sonorous sinners was she in 
her anterior existence any or all of them? 
Did she know the glory that was Greece, the 
grandeur that was Rome? Henry James has 
warned us not to ask of an author why he selects 
a particular subject for treatment. It is a dan- 
gerous question to put; the answer might prove 
6 



MARY GARDEN 

disconcerting. And with Miss Garden the same 
argument holds. Her preference for certain 
characters is probably dictated by reasons ob- 
scure even to herself. With her the play- 
instinct is imperious; it dominates her daylight 
hours, it overflows into her dream-life. Again 
the sounding motive of multiple personalities, 
Karma, subconsciousness, the profound core of 
human nature. And on the palette of her art 
there is the entire gamut of tones, from passion- 
ate purple to the iridescent delicacies of iris- 
grey. 

That Mary Garden interprets a number of 
widely differentiated characters is a critical 
platitude. Chapter and verse might be given 
for her excellences as well as her defects. Nor 
does she depend upon any technical formula 
or formulas. Versatility is her brevet of dis- 
tinction. An astounding versatility. Now, the 
ways and means of the acting-singer are differ- 
ent from actors in the theatre. Dramatic 
values are altered. The optique of the opera 
shifts the stock attitudes, gestures, poses, and 
movements into another and more magnified 
dimension. Victor Maurel, master of all sing- 
ing-actors, employed a sliding scale of values in 
his delineation of De Nevers, Don Giovanni, 
lago, and Falstaff. His power of characteriza- 
tion enabled him to portray a Valentine true to 
type, nevertheless individual; and if there is a 
more banal figure on the operatic boards than 
Valentine, we do not know his name (perhaps 
7 



BEDOUINS 

Faust . . .!). But every year the space that 
separates the lyric from the dramatic stage is 
shrinking. Richard Wagner was not the first 
composer to stress action; he is the latest, how- 
ever, whose influence has been tremendously 
far-reaching. He insisted that the action should 
suit the singing word. To-day acting and sing- 
ing are inextricably blended, and I can conceive 
of nothing more old-fashioned and outmoded 
than the Wagnerian music-drama as interpreted 
in the dramatic terms of the old Wagnerian sing- 
ers. They walked, rather waddled, through the 
mystic mazes of the score, shouted or screamed 
the music, and generally were prodigious bores 
except when Lilli Lehmann sang. After all, 
Wagner must be sung. When Jean de Reszke 
pictured a Tristan a trifle of the carpet-knight 
he both sang and acted. It was the begin- 
ning of the New Wagner, a totally changed 
Wagner, else his music-drama will remain in 
dusty pigeonholes. Debussy has sounded the 
modern key. 

There is bora, or reborn nothing is new since 
the early Florentines a New Opera, and in its 
train new methods of interpretation. Merely 
to sing well is as futile as attempting to act 
though voiceless. The modern trend is away 
from melodrama, whether Italian, French, or 
German; away from its antique, creaking ma- 
chinery. Debussy patterned after Wagner for 
a time and then blazed new paths. As Serge 
ProkorierT so acutely observed to me: "In Pel- 
8 



MARY GARDEN 

16as and Melisande Debussy rewrote Tris- 
tan and Isolde." The emotional scale is trans- 
posed to fewer dynamic values and rhythms 
made more subtle; the action is shown as in a 
dream. The play's the thing, and reality is 
muffled. Elsewhere we have studied the Meli- 
sande of Mary Garden. Like her Monna 
Vanna, it reveals the virtues and shortcomings 
of the New Opera. Too static for popular taste, 
it is nevertheless an escape from the tyranny of 
operatic convention. Like the rich we shall 
always have "grand opera" with us. It is the 
pabulum of the unmusical, the unthinking, the 
tasteless. Its theatricalisms are more depressing 
than Sardou's. The quintessence of art, or the 
arts, which the modern Frenchmen, above all, 
the new Russian composers (from the mighty 
Slavic races may come the artistic, perhaps the 
religious salvation of the world for I am a be- 
liever in Dostoievsky's, not Tolstoy's, Christian- 
ity), are distilling into their work is for more 
auditors than the "ten superior persons scat- 
tered throughout the universe" of whom Huys- 
mans wrote. There is a growing public that 
craves, demands, something different from the 
huge paraphernalia of crudely colored music, 
scenery, costume, lath and plaster, and vocifer- 
ous singing. Oh, the dulness, the staleness, the 
brutal obviousness of it all! Every cadence 
with its semaphoric signalling, every phrase and 
its accompanying gesture. Poetry is slain at a 
stroke, the ear promise-crammed, but imagina- 
9 



BEDOUINS 

tion goes hungry. The New Art an art of 
precious essences, an evocation, an enchantment 
of the senses, a sixth sense is our planetary 
ideal. 

And in the New Opera Mary Garden is the 
supreme exemplar. She sounds the complex 
modern note. She does not represent, she 
evokes. She sings and she acts, and the densely 
woven web is impossible to disentangle. Her 
Gaelic temperament is of an intensity; she is 
white-hot, a human dynamo with sudden little 
retorsions that betray a tender, sensitive soul, 
through the brilliant, hard shell of an emerald 
personality; she is also the opal, with it chame- 
leonic hues. Her rhythms are individual. Her 
artistic evolution may be traced. She stems 
from the Gallic theatre. She has studied Sarah 
Bernhardt and Yvette Guilbert the perfect 
flowering of the "diseuse" but she pins her 
faith to the effortless art of Eleonora Duse. 
The old contention that stirred Coquelin and 
Henry Irving does not interest her so much as 
does Duse. We have discussed the Coquelin- 
Irving crux: should an actor leave nothing to 
chance or should he improvise on the spur of 
high emotions? that is what the question 
comes to. Miss Garden denied her adherence 
either to Coquelin or Irving. I asked her to 
give us a peep into her artistic cuisine while she 
prepared her sauces. Notwithstanding her re- 
fusal to let us participate in the brewing of her 
magic broth, I still believe that she sided with 
10 



MARY GARDEN 

Coquelin. She is eminently cerebral. And yet 
her chief appeal is to the imagination. Not a 
stroke of her camel's-hair brush, not the boldest 
massing of colors, are left to chance. She knows 
the flaming way she came, she knows the misty 
return. Not a tone of her naturally rich, dark 
voice but takes on the tinting of the situation. 
This doesn't forbid a certain latitude for tem- 
peramental variations, which are plentiful at 
each of her performances. She knows tempo 
rubato and its value in moods. She has mas- 
tered, too, the difficult quality described by 
William Gillette as the First-time Illusion in 
Acting. Various are the Mary Gardens in her 
map of art. 

And she is ours. Despite her Scottish birth 
she has remained invincibly Yankee. Despite 
long residence in her beloved Paris, enough 
American has rubbed off on her, and the resili- 
ent, dynamic, overflowing, and proud spirit that 
informs her art and character are American or 
nothing. Race counts. Can any good come 
out of our Nazareth of art? The answer is 
inevitable: Yes, Mary Garden. She is Our 
Mary. Lyrically, dramatically ours, yet an 
orchid. Dear old Flaubert forcibly objected to 
Sarah Bernhardt being called "a social expres- 
sion." But she was, and this despite her Dutch 
ancestry and the exotic strain in her blood. 
Miss Garden may not emphasize her American 
side, but it is the very skeleton of her artistic 
organism. Would that an Aubrey Beardsley 
ii 



BEDOUINS 

lived to note in evanescent traceries her potent 
personality, a rare something that arouses the 
"emotion of recognition," but which we cannot 
define. " Come," said Berlioz to Legouve in the 
early years of the third decade of the last cen- 
tury. "I am going to let you see something 
which you have never seen, and some one whom 
you shall never forget." Berlioz meant the 
playing and personality of Frederic Chopin. 
Garden is leagues asunder from Chopin who 
was the rarest apparition of his age; but as an 
interpretative artist she is rare enough for sym- 
pathetic writers to embalm in the amber of their 
pagan prose; definitely to pin to their pages this 
gorgeous dragon-fly. 

Another bribe to her audience is the beauty 
of Mary Garden. But I do not wish here to 
dwell upon its value in her unforgettable por- 
trayals of the dear dead grand ladies, the stately 
courtesans of the dim past. Stephane Mal- 
larme wrote a poem, though not in verse, de- 
picting a crowd assembled in the canvas house 
of the Interpreter of Past Things. 

George Moore thus Englished "The Future 
Phenomenon." A showman tells the despair- 
ing, ugly men and women of his wonderful prize. 
"No sign regales you of the spectacle within, 
for there is not now a painter capable of present- 
ing any sad shadow of it. I bring alive (and 
preserved through the years by sovereign sci- 
ence) a woman of old time. Some folly, original 
and simple, in ecstasy of gold, I know not what 
12 



MARY GARDEN 

she names it, her hair falls with the grace of 
rich stuffs about her face and contrasts with 
the blood-like nudity of her lips. In place of 
her vain gown she has a body; and her eyes, 
though like rare stones, are not worth the look 
that leaps from the happy flesh; the breasts, 
raised as if filled with an eternal milk, are 
pointed to the sky, and the smooth limbs still 
keep the salt of the primal sea. ..." You 
think of fair-haired Melisande as she exquisitely 
murmurs her pathetic "Je ne suis pas heureuse 
ici." 

Some years ago in Paris I saw and heard the 
Garden Traviata. The singing was superlative; 
she then boasted a coloratura style that would 
surprise those who now only know her vocaliza- 
tion. It was, however, the conception and act- 
ing that intrigued me. Originality stamped 
both. The death scene was of unusual poign- 
ancy; evidently the young American had been 
spying upon Bernhardt and Duse. This episode 
adumbrated the marvellous death of Melisande, 
the most touching that I can recall in either the 
lyric or dramatic theatre. It is a pity that she 
cannot find sterner stuff than Massenet, Leroux, 
Fevrier, and the rest of that puff-paste decora- 
tive school. There are composers, too, of more 
vital calibre than Camille Erlanger. Debussy 
is a master; but there must be newer men who 
could view Mary Garden as the ideal exponent 
of their music. Meanwhile, she has discovered 
a rdle in which she would pique the curiosity of 



BEDOUINS 

the most uncritical mossbacks. She has added 
Isolde to her long list. Mary Garden and 
Isolde ! Incredible ! Nevertheless, an interest- 
ing experiment this if she could be persuaded to 
voice the sorrows of the Irish Princess. It 
would be no longer Wagner. It would suffer a 
rich sea-change. Wagner muted, perhaps Wag- 
ner undone; certainly unsung if we remember 
glorious Olive Fremstad. But a magical Isolde, 
with more than a hint of the perversely exotic 
we feel in Aubrey Beardsley's drawings of Isolde 
and Tristan. The modern note again. Beards- 
ley paraphrasing Botticelli; Watteau plucking 
at the robe of Rubens; Debussy smiting the 
chords of Wagner. Such an Isolde would be 
too bewildering to be true. 



II 

INTIMATE 

"Et on fait la guerre avec de la musique, des panaches, 
des drapeaus, des hanches d'or. ..." 

Tentation de Saint Antoine (slightly altered}. 

THE penalty of publicity is one which singers 
seldom evade. Little need to give the reason, 
nevertheless, for sensitive souls it is a trial to 
see one's personality put in the wash, squeezed, 
and hung up to dry with other linen in the piti- 
less laundry of the press. Some singers are born 
advertisers, some achieve advertising, but few 
have advertising thrust upon them. That sort 
usually fade into shadow-land rather than face 
the fierce white light which beats about the 
operatic throne. Really, it must be disconcert- 
ing for a woman singer to hear herself discussed 
as if she were a race-horse. Every point in her 
make-up is put on a platter ready to serve 
hot in the newspapers. You fancy yourself 
overhearing the conversation of jockeys and 
trainers. "Oi sye, Bill, that there filly is goin' 
queer. Jest look at her fetlocks, and her crup- 
per is gettin' too heavy. Take her out for an 
hour's spin on the downs. Breathe her a bit 
and then give her a hard sweatin' run and a 



BEDOUINS 

rub down. No water, Bill, mind ye, or I'll 
knock yer block off." 

The private life of a prima donna is not unlike 
that of a racing mare's. Flesh reduction, with 
all the succulent food and champagne are 
banished; indulgence spells decadence, and de- 
cadence is eagerly noted by the psychic detec- 
tives known as music-critics. We are not in 
the game to find fault as simple souls imagine, 
but to register values, vocal and personal. 
It's a pity, but this is a condition and not a 
theory. We have heard of a Mary Garden cult. 
Now, as has been said by Dr. Wicksteed, a cult 
is always annoying to those who do not join in 
it, and generally hurtful to those who do. But 
is there such a Garden cult? We doubt it. 
She has a certain gleet following, and for those 
admirers she can do no- wrong. She has aroused 
the critical antagonism of some who, rightly 
enough, point out her obvious limitations. To 
these the gruff reply of Brahms is appropriate. 
A presuming youth called his attention to a 
theme in a work of his which was evidently 
borrowed from Mendelssohn. "That any fool 
can see," said the crusty Johannes. The voice 
of Miss Garden is sometimes a voice in the wil- 
derness: sandy, harsh, yet expressive. The 
same may be said of Geraldine Farrar, who 
every year is gravitating toward the zone, not 
of silence, but of the singing-actress. A Gallic, 
not an Italian zone. Voice does not play the 
major r61e; acting, that is, dramatic character- 
16 



MARY GARDEN 

ization, does. Not to recognize in Miss Garden 
the quintessence of this art not altogether a new 
one, and its most perfect flowering is the art of 
Yvette Guilbert is to miss the real Mary Gar- 
den. Voilatout! We saw a like misunderstand- 
ing of Eleonora Duse. Immediately she was com- 
pared, and unfavorably, with Sarah Bernhardt, 
when she was achieving something vastly differ- 
ent, and, I think, vastly finer. Sarah was more 
brilliant, Duse more human; the one an orches- 
tra, the other an exquisitely balanced string 
quartet. Mary Garden is the nearest approach 
to Duse on the lyric stage. 

Mary Garden, too, is "different," in the sense 
Stendhal meant that banal word. Her cadenced 
speech is not singing in the Italian manner. 
To begin with, her tonal texture is not luscious. 
But there are compensations. Every phrase is 
charged with significance. She paints with her 
voice, and if her palette is composed of the 
cooler tones, if the silver-greys and sombre 
greens of a Velasquez predominate, it is because 
she needs just such a gamut with which to load 
her brush. She is a consummate manipulator 
of values. To be sure, we do not expect the 
torrential outbursts of Margaret Matzenauer. 
Why confuse two antithetical propositions? I 
don't look at one of the Paul Cezannes in the 
rare collection of Miss Lillie Bliss expecting the 
gorgeous hues of a Monticelli. Cezanne is a 
master of values. And if these similes seem 
far-fetched which they are not; music and color 
17 



BEDOUINS 

are twins in the Seven Arts then let us pitch 
upon a more homely illustration: Mary Garden 
is an opal, Margaret Matzenauer a full-blown 
rose. Voltaire said that the first man who com- 
pared a woman to a rose was a poet; the second, 
an ass. I hope Mme. Matzenauer will accept 
the simile in the poetic sense. 

Nuance, which alone makes art or life endur- 
able, becomes an evocation with Miss Garden. 
I lament that she is not in a more intimate set- 
ting, as the misted fire and rhythmic modulations 
of her opaline art and personality are lost in 
such a huge auditorium as the Lexington Thea- 
tre. I saw her, a slip of a girl, at Paris, early 
in this century, and framed by the Opera Com- 
ique, of whose traditions she is now the most dis- 
tinguished exponent. She was then something 
precious: a line of Pater's prose, the glance of 
one of Da Vinci's strange ladies; a chord by 
Debussy; honey, tiger's blood, and absinthe; 
or like the enigmatic pallor we see in Renais- 
sance portraits; cruel, voluptuous, and suggest- 
ing the ennui of Watteau's L'Indifferent. 

She is all things to all critics. 

There are those who see in her the fascinating 
woman. And they are justified in their belief. 
There are those who discover in her something 
disquieting, ambiguous; one of Baudelaire's 
"femmes damnees" from whom he fashioned his 
Beethovenian harmonies, fulgurating, profound: 
"Descendez le chemin de 1'enfer eternel! . . . 
flagelle's par un vent qui ne vient pas du del." 
18 



MARY GARDEN 

. . . And there is still another group to which 
I adhere, one that envisages Mary in the more 
lucid light of an admirable artist, who has 
fashioned of her body and soul a rare instru- 
ment, giving forth the lovely music of attitude, 
gesture, pose, and rhythm. There are moments 
when she evokes the image of the shadow of a 
humming-bird on a star; and often she sounds 
the shuddering semitones of sex, as in Thais. 
The Melisande moods are hers, the dim, remote 
poesy of antique sonorous tapestries; and the 
"modern" note of Louise, grazing the vulgar, 
though purified by passion. But the dissenters 
no doubt believe in the Cambodian proverb 
when estimating the singing of both Geraldine 
Farrar and Mary Garden. It runs thus: When 
in hades it is bad form to speak of the heat. 

Do you remember the night when Mary Gar- 
den came from the refectory of the monastery 
in Le Jongleur, and oh, the winsome little 
devil! paused on the stairway to remark to 
her audience: "La cuisine est tres bonne"? 

The accent was indescribable. At Paris they 
admired her individual French streaked with 
exotic intonations. That night it revealed the 
universal accent of a half-starved lad who had 
just filled his tummy; a real "tuck-out." The 
joy of life! How human she was! It is the 
sartorial technique of Miss Garden that is su- 
preme. Her taste in costumes is impeccable. 
In the eternal game of making masculine eyes 
misbehave, she is quite irresistible. But this 
19 



BEDOUINS 

orchidaceous Circe, this uncommon or garden 
variety, does not with her fatal philtres trans- 
form men into the unmentionable animal; rather 
does she cause them to scurry after their vocab- 
ulary and lift up their voices in rhetorical praise. 
And that is something to have accomplished. 
Did you ever read Casuals of the Sea, by 
William McFee, a fiction I had the honor to 
introduce to the American reading public? On 
page 443 there occurs at the chapter end the 
following dialogue: "Mother!" "Yes, Min- 
nie." "Mother, I was just thinking what fools 
men are ! What utter fools ! But oh, mother, 
dear mother, what fools we are, not to find it 
out sooner ! " Minnie had seen a bit of life on 
the Continent; she was then snug in the land- 
locked harbor of stagnant matrimonial waters. 
But she understood men. Miss Garden is a 
profounder philosopher than Minnie Briscoe. 
She knew her public " sooner," and the result is 
Mary Garden. Qui a bu, boira ! 

I have been asked whether Miss Garden be- 
lieves that she is the wonderful artiste I believe 
her to be. I really don't know. But I feel 
assured that if she discovers she does not measure 
up to all the qualities ascribed to her she will 
promptly develop them; such is the plastic, 
involutionary force of this extraordinary woman. 



20 



Ill 

THE BABY, THE CRITIC, AND 
THE GUITAR 

GEORGE SAINTSBURY, that blunt literary critic 
who always called a cat a cat, wrote a study of 
Charles Baudelaire in an English magazine at 
least forty years ago. It practically introduced 
the poet to English readers, although Swin- 
burne had imported no little of the "poisonous 
honey from France" in Laus Veneris. Prof. 
Saintsbury told of a friend to whom he had 
shown the etching of Francois Flameng after 
Herrera's The Baby and the Guitar. "So," 
said the friend, "you like this picture. I al- 
ways thought you hated babies !" The remark 
is a classic example of that sin against the 
holy ghost of criticism, the confusion of two 
widely varying intellectual substances; a mixing 
up of the babies with a vengeance. The anec- 
dote may serve to point a moral if not to 
adorn my sermon. 

The operatic undertow of the past season 
cast up strange flotsam and jetsam and dere- 
licts, usually in the shape of letters. Letters 
signed and unsigned. Two I select as illustrat- 
ing the Baby and the Guitar crux. I stand for 
the Baby and two celebrated singing girls repre- 
21 



BEDOUINS 

sent the Guitar. Both letters are unsigned, both 
reveal a woman's handwriting, though different 
women. The first roundly accuses the dignified 
author of being madly in love with Mary Gar- 
den; the second wonders why I worship Mar- 
garet Matzenauer. Now, the venerable age of 
the present alleged and versatile "great lover" 
Leo Ditrichstein should look to his laurels ! 
might serve as an implicit denial of these charges, 
were it not the fact that there are hoary-headed 
sinners abroad seeking whom they may devour. 
If I were a young chap I should pay no atten- 
tion, but being as old as I am I proudly confess 
my crimes, merely pausing to ask, who isn't in 
love with Mary Garden and Margaret Matze- 
nauer? Their audiences, to an unprejudiced 
eye, seem to be very much so, men, women, and 
children alike. Why not that worm-of-all-work, 
the music-critic? We, too, have feelings like 
any other humans. But worse follows. A sym- 
pathetic singer sent me a telegram which read 
thus: "Why doesn't your wife put you behind 
bars?" to which I promptly replied, Celtic 
fashion, by asking another question: "Which 
one?" meaning, of course, which bar. Here is 
a concrete case of the Baby and the Guitar 
muddle. One can't praise the art of Mary 
Garden without loving the woman ! One can't 
admire the opulent voice of Margaret Matze- 
nauer without being dragged a hopeless slave at 
her triumphant chariot wheels; a critic butchered 
to make a prima donna's holiday ! Absurd ! 

22 



MARY GARDEN 

And there are others. What of radiant Ger- 
aldine with the starry eyes? What of Frieda 
Hempel, exquisite Violetta, delicious Countess 
in the Rose-Cavalier? And what of Olive 
Fremstad, always beautiful, an Isolde whose 
tenderness is without peer, a Sieglinde who 
plucks at your heartstrings because of her pity- 
breeding loveliness, or as that dazzling witch, 
Kundry; and to whose beauty the years have 
lent a tragic, expressive mask? There were 
queens, too, before Agamemnon's. Lilli Leh- 
mann, Emma Eames, Lillian Nordica, Emma 
Calve did we not burn incense under the nos- 
trils of those beautiful women and great artists? 
Go to! Nor was our praise accorded only to 
the girls of yesteryear. The De Reszkes, Vic- 
tor Maurel, Max Alvary as perfect a type of 
the matinee idol as Harry Montague or Charles 
Coghlan the stately, if slightly frigid, Pol Plan- 
on upon them we showered our warmest en- 
thusiasms. And Ignace Jan Paderewski, once 
Premier Opus I of Poland was he neglected? 
The piano god par excellence. No, such gener- 
alizations are unfair. The average music-critic 
or dramatic critic is nothing if not versatile in 
his tastes. Remember that either one has op- 
portunities to see and hear the most comely faces 
and sweetest voices. Nevertheless I know of 
none who ever lost his head. We play no favor- 
ites. I also admit that this apologetic tone is the 
kind of excuse that is accusatory. But ! 

But there is another name which slipped the 
23 



BEDOUINS 

memory of my faultfinders. What of Rosina 
Galli, whose pedal technique is as perfect as the 
vocal technique of Miss Hempel; whose mimique 
is as wonderful in its way as are the hieratic atti- 
tudes and patibulary gestures of Mary, the 
celebrated serpent of Old Nile? Don't we, to 
a man, adore Rosina ? Thunderous affirmations 
assail the welkin ! And then there is the " poet's 
secret," as Bernard Shaw, the "Uncle Gurne- 
manz" of British politics, has it. The secret in 
question is as simple as Polchinelle's. Do you 
realize that to a writer interested in his art such 
women as Mary Garden or Margaret Matze- 
nauer serve as a peg for his polyphonic prose or 
as models upon which to drape his cloth-of-silver 
when writing of Geraldine Farrar? A suscepti- 
ble critic may perforce sigh like a symphonic 
furnace, but apart from such fatuities he can't 
keep up the excitement without a lot of emotional 
stoking. And coal is so costly this year. That 
alone negates the assertion of undue sentimen- 
tality. Pooh! I shouldn't give a hang for a 
critic so cold that he couldn't write overheated 
prose, Byzantine prose, purple-patched and 
swaggeringly rhythmed, when facing these 
golden girls. "Passionate press agents," indeed, 
but in the strict sense intended when Philip Hale 
struck off that memorial phrase. There is Pitts 
Sanborn with his "lithe moon-blonde wonderful 
Mary," which I envy him; after my spilth of 
adjectives he limns in five words the garden- 
goddess, Themes, those singers, for gorgeous 
24 



From a photograph by De Strelecki 

ROSINA GALLI 



MARY GARDEN 

vocables; nothing more. Footlight-prose quickly 
forgotten if you take from the shelf in your 
library the beloved essays of Cardinal Newman 
and swim in the cool currents of his silvery style. 
A panacea for the strained, morbid, fantastic 
atmosphere of grand opera. 

A character in one of Goethe's novels Wil- 
helm Meister? exclaims: "Five minutes more 
of this and I confess everything ! " Another such 
season of overwrought reportage and my bag of 
highly colored phrases, all my trick adjectives, 
would be exhausted, else gone stale, and the 
same gang of girls ever expecting new and more 
miraculous homage in four languages with a 
brass band around the corner. Oh ! la ! la ! 

There was one critic that did fall in love with 
an actress. His name is Hector Berlioz, and he 
celebrated the charms of Henrietta Smithson, 
English born, a "guest" at a Parisian theatre, 
by passionately pounding the kettle-drums in 
the orchestra. His amatory tattoo, coupled with 
his flaming locks, finally attracted the lady's 
attention, and after she broke her leg and was 
forced to abandon the stage she had her revenge 
she married the kettle-drum critic and com- 
poser, and lived unhappily ever afterward. Yet 
the feeling against critics persists, probably 
prompted by envy. In a Dublin theatre gallery 
a fight broke out, and one chap was getting the 
worst of it. His more powerful adversary was 
pushing him over the rail into the orchestra, 
when a wag called out: "Don't waste him. Kill 
25 



BEDOUINS 

a fiddler with him !" Nowadays he would say, 
"Kill a critic." But sufferance is the badge 
of our tribe. There are times when I long for 
the unaffected charm of Heller rather than 
Chopin; when I prefer to gaze at Wagner's Grane 
rather than hear Brunhilde sing. 

Mary Garden makes herself beautiful, if only 
by thinking "beautiful." "Whatever happens, I 
must be an emerald," said Antoninus of the 
emerald's morality. Havelock Ellis asserts, 
"the exquisite things of life are to-day as rare 
and as precious as ever they were." She is rare 
and precious in Melisande, Monna Vanna, Jean, 
and other roles. And what imaginative inten- 
sity is hers ! But I don't care a fig for the 
depraved creatures of the Lower Empire she so 
marvellously portrays. It is Mary with the 
strain of mysticism, the woodland fay she shows 
us, its nascent soul modulating into the supreme 
suffering and sorrow of motherhood. Her bed 
of death in Melisande is one of the high consola- 
tions in the memory of a critic whose existence 
has been spent in the quagmire of mediocrity. 
In the kingdom of the mystics there are many 
mansions, and Garden lives in one at times. 

But the detraque lemans she pictures are 
often repugnant. The decadent art of Byzance. 
The Infernal Feminine. A vase exquisitely 
carved containing corruption. Sculptured slime. 
You close your eyes but open your fingers; the 
temptation to peep is irresistible. 

In his illuminative studies of Fremstad, Far- 
26 



MARY GARDEN 

rar, Garden, Mazarin, Interpreters and Inter- 
pretations, Carl Van Vechten says that to Miss 
Garden a wig is the all-important thing. "Once 
I have donned the wig of a character, I am that 
character. It would be difficult for me to go 
on the stage in my own hair." However, she 
did so in Louise, adds the critic. Felix Orman 
reports that when he asked her if she would be 
content to give up singing and become a dra- 
matic artist, she replied: "No. I need the 
music. I depend on it. Music is my medium 
of expression." An art amphibian, hybrid, hers. 
The flying fish. The bird that swims. The du- 
bious trail of the epicene is not a modern note. 
Rome and Alexandria knew it. It is vile, soul- 
less, yet fascinating. Miss Garden incarnates it 
as no other modern since the divine Sarah. She 
is "cerebrale," and a cerebral is defined by 
Arthur Symons as one who feels with the head 
and thinks with the heart. Richard Strauss is 
a prime exemplar. The image suggests both 
apoplexy and angina pectoris, yet it serves. She 
is as hard as steel in Louise or Cleopatre, yet 
how melting as Monna and Melisande. She 
may be heartless for all I know, and that is in 
her favor, artistically considered, for Steeplejack 
hath enjoined: A cool head and a wicked heart 
will conquer the world; also, what shall it profit 
a woman if she saves her soul but loseth love? 
Cynical Steeplejack ? Yet, a half-truth though 
not the upper half of that shy goddess, Truth. 
As for Margaret Matzenauer, her art and per- 
27 



BEDOUINS 

sonality transport the imagination to more 
exotic climes. That sombre and magnificent 
woman, who seems to have stepped from a 
fresco of Hans Makart, himself a follower of 
Paolo Veronese, is a singing Caterina Cornaro. 
She brought back an element of lyric grandeur 
to our pale operatic life; a Judith, a Deborah, 
Boadicea, Belkis, Clytemnestra, Dalila, Amneris, 
or Aholibah, all those splendid tragic shapes of 
the antique world, she evokes, and in her sing- 
ing there is a largeness of dramatic utterance 
that proclaims her of the line royal: Lehmann, 
Brandt, Ternina, Fremstad, Schumann-Heink. 
Is it at all remarkable that I admire Matzenauer ? 
And now that we have cleared away some 
cobwebs of misapprehension with the aid of the 
Baby and the Guitar, let me relate a story of 
Chateaubriand, that Eternal Philanderer, as I 
once named him, who met at Rome gay Hor- 
tense Allart, afterward Madame Meritens. The 
supreme master of French prose regretfully ex- 
claimed to her: "Ah, if I had back my fifty 
years." Thereupon the sprightly lady replied: 
"Why not wish for twenty-five?" "No," 
moodily returned the Ambassador, "fifty will 
do." Which recalls the witty design of Forain, 
representing a very old man apostrophizing the 
shadow of his past: "Oh, if I only had again my 
sixty-five years!" I should be glad to have 
my threescore and ten if only to tell those great 
ladies of opera how much I admire them. "Bar- 
kis is willin'." 

28 



MARY GARDEN 

Another picture and I shall have done. Lis- 
ten. I, many years ago, visited the Fondation 
Ste. Ferine at Auteuil, an institution endowed by 
the Empress Eugenie, one in which the benevo- 
lence is so cloaked as not to hurt the sensibilities 
of the resident superannuated ladies and gen- 
tlemen. The company boasted noble origins. 
Among the ladies I met was a Polish-born Mar- 
quise, with brilliant eyes and wonderful white 
hair, her own. She had studied with Chopin. 
She said he was fickle and that George Sand was 
often jealous of his pupils. For me she sang in 
a sweet, true, but quavering voice Chopin's 
Maiden's Wish, and compelled tears. The 
Marquise then tinkled with a still small tone a 
Nocturne by Field upon a pianoforte whose 
ivory keys looked as if they exhaled pearly 
sighs. She gently coquetted with a touch of 
exquisite Sarmatian evasiveness. For me she 
was adorable, although if she had laughed her 
face would have cracked its artistic plastering. 
What a new Diana of Poitiers ! What wit, fire, 
malice, were in the glance of her soft, faded blue 
eyes ! What a magically youthful heart ! She 
must have been more than fourscore. 

But yet a woman. 



29 



IV 
INTERPRETER 

TO MARY GARDEN AS CLEOPATRA 
"C'estAffreuxMourir" 

"And now this scorched terrace is your sole domain, 
Your only subject Roman, dying Anthony; 
The outer vastnesses they held, the soldiery 
Of Caesar; their stout captain will not here refrain. 

You lived, Queen, but not to countenance that pain 
Which is surrender of the body's sovereignty; 
You take your part; is it the frightful thing to die 
And see in dying just the realm you must regain? 

You have not let the game play you, my Queen, but fed 
The aspic at a famished breast the rascal fresh 
From gluttony a glutton still ! Why, the hot land 
Is dim, alone lies Anthony save for the dead 
One more ambition, Queen, for your expiring hand. 
The last adventure, woman of imperious flesh !" 

Pitts Sanborn. 

CLEOPATRA 

THOUGH the first hearing of the work in New 
York was during the winter of 1919 at the Lex- 
ington Theatre, and sung by the Chicago Opera 
Association, Cleofonte Campanini, director, it 
had been presented before Chicago audiences 
when the impersonation of the supersubtle ser- 
pent of Old Nile by Mary Garden caused much 
30 



MARY GARDEN 

comment, critical and otherwise. The libretto 
states that the conception of M. Payen radically 
differs from Shakespeare's tragedy a rather 
superfluous remark. It does considerably differ, 
the principal difference being that Shakespeare 
wrote great poetry as well as great drama. 

Payen's attempt resolves itself into a series of 
tableaux, the characterization generalized, his 
verse respectably tepid. In a word, not the 
Queen that Shakespeare drew. Of this Cleo- 
patre you dare not say: "Age cannot wither her, 
nor custom stale her infinite variety." She is 
more germane to that Queen shown us in the 
sumptuous prose of Theophile Gautier's Une 
Nuit de Cleopatre than the imperial courtesan 
who turned the head of Anthony and stirred the 
pulse of Julius Caesar to the supreme tune of 
Shakespeare's music. 

There is plenty of action, some picturesque 
episodes, and at least one brutal scene. Of love 
and the talk of love there is no end. Yet it is 
not all convincing. Moving pictures. You 
think of Gerome, of Le Nouy, of the hundred 
and one painters who have celebrated on can- 
vas this seductive creature of old Egypt. "For 
her own person, it beggar 'd all description; she 
did lie in her pavilion, cloth-of-gold of tissue, 
o'er-picturing that Venus where we see the 
fancy out-work nature." 

Cleopatre is Massenet and the modiste. 
Brackish-sweet, it is the ultimate expression 
of musical impotence. Clever craftsman Masse- 



BEDOUINS 

het could turn out martial music and amorous, 
the clangor of trumpets and voluptuous, dizzy 
dance measures. But here it is generally bosh. 
Languid, enervating, it attained a feeble climax 
in the ballet of the penultimate act. Ambigu- 
ous shapes and attitudes crowded the scene. 
Two dancers slipped and fell, but the recovery 
was so swift that the tumbled ensemble seemed 
a veritable climax. Cleopatre cynically regarded 
this daring symbolism, though Marc-Antoine 
seemed rather shocked. And he should have 
been. Musically speaking, nothing happened in 
Act I; less followed in Act II, while Act III was 
a glittering triumph of vacuity. In the last act 
the asp played protagonist. As its name did 
not figure on the programme, it probably died 
from envy, or else inanition, doubtless humming 
Will Shakespeare's mournful lay: "I am dying, 
Egypt, dying." You also recall Swinburne's: 
"Under those low, large lids of hers She hath 
the histories of all times. . . ." 

But the Cleopatre ! A youthful Sphinx, her 
entrance on the great burnished barge was an 
evocation. As she faced Antoine so must have 
looked Sheba's Queen before the majesty of Sol- 
omon. It would have been trying on the nerves 
of the most pudic potentate from Herod down. 
A saucy lad, in a later scene, Cleopatre got in a 
mix-up at an early-Egyptian boozing-ken. An 
extraordinary apparition, a fantastic faun of 
Aubrey Beardsley caught the roving riggish eye 
of the disguised Queen. She encouraged the 
32 



MARY GARDEN 

advances of the anonymous animal. An Adonis 
a rebours. Pavley was this delicate monster 
and his subtle rhythms made Cleopatre shiver. 
Here the music was too prudish. 

Stravinsky or Richard Strauss would have 
given the screw an enharmonic wrench. Act III 
saw the Queen attired at once so sonorously and 
exquisitely that the vast audience gasped with 
admiration. It is, however, the tavern scene 
that will save the tawdry work. The anatomi- 
cal wigwagging of the two golden lads set the 
lobby buzzing. Cleopatre is doomed to packed 
houses in the future. Nothing succeeds like 
true spirituality. 

Mary Garden is Cleopatre, as she is Melisande 
and Thais. It is not a role that taxes her drama- 
tic resources or her personal pulchritude. All 
she did was to look beautiful and turn on the full 
voltage of her blandishments. Men went to the 
ground before that dynamic yet veiled glance, like 
soldiers facing a machine-gun. It is uncanny, 
the emotion she projects across the footlights 
and with such simple but cerebral means. 

That she would have been burned at the 
stake a few centuries ago, this lovely witch, is 
no conjecture. Her nose is not "tip-tilted like 
the petal of a flower," as Cleopatre's is said to 
have been; nevertheless, she is the tawny Egyp- 
tian. And she has never spoken so eloquently 
as in this parlando part. Perhaps the most 
poignant criticism was carelessly uttered by a 
big policeman who had strayed in during the 
33 



BEDOUINS 

garden scene. "Some Queen!" he said. And 
the definitive words had been spoken. Fie on 
naughty professional opinion after that memo- 
rial phrase ! 

MLISANDE 

Once upon a time we called this "precious" 
lyric work Wagner and Absinthe, for there 
are many rumors of Tristan and Isolde in it, 
and the opalescent music, drugged with dreams, 
has the numbing effect of that "green fairy" 
no longer permitted in la belle France. Like all 
epigrams, this is only a half-truth. In the Bel- 
gian poet's The Death of Tintagiles so wonder- 
fully interpreted in tone by Charles Martin 
Loeffler his marionettes are beginning to mod- 
ulate into flesh and blood, and, like the mermaid 
of the fairy story, the transformation is a pain- 
ful one. We note the achievement of a new 
manner in Pelleas and Melisande. Played in 
English first by Forbes-Robertson and Mrs. 
Patrick Campbell, the piece created a mixed 
impression in London, though it may be con- 
fessed that, despite the scenic splendor, the act- 
ing transposed to a lower realistic key this 
lovely drama of souls. No play of Maeterlinck's 
is so saturated with poesy, replete with romance. 
There are episodes almost as intense as the 
second act of Tristan. We listen for King 
Mark's distant, tremulous hunting-horns in the 
forest scene when Pell6as and Melisande un- 
cover their hearts. 

34 




From a photograph copyrighted by Davis and Eickemeyer 

MARY GARDEN AS MELISANDE 



MARY GARDEN 

The second act begins at an immemorial 
fountain in the royal park. Here the young 
Prince sits with the wife of his brother. Meli- 
sande is the most convincing full-length portrait 
of the poet. Exquisitely girlish, she charms 
with her strange Undine airs. Melisande is en- 
veloped in the haze of the romantically remote. 
At times she seems to melt into the green tapes- 
try of the forest. She is a woodland creature. 
More melancholy than Miranda, she is not 
without traces of her high-bred temperament; 
less real than Juliet, she is also passion-smitten. 
You recall Melusina and Rautendelein. Not 
altogether comprehensible, Melisande piques us 
by her waywardness, her fascinating if infan- 
tile change of moods. At the spring the two 
converse of the water and its healing powers. 
"You would say that my hands were sick to- 
day/' she murmurs as she dips her fingers into 
the pool. The dialogue is as elliptical as if 
written by Browning or Henry James. But the 
symbol floats like a flag. 

The mad apostrophe to the hair of Melisande 
is in key with this moving tableau. Perhaps 
Maeterlinck took a hint from the mournful tale 
of his friend, the Belgian poet Georges Roden- 
bach (Bruges-la-Morte), with its reincarnation 
of a dead woman in the form and features of a 
live one. The beautiful hair of the new love 
serves but to strangle her. Pelleas is more 
tender. 

"I have never, never seen such hair as thine, 
35 



BEDOUINS 

Melisande. I see the sky no longer through 
thy locks. . . . They are alive like birds in 
my hands." The last scene, as Melisande 
dies of a broken heart, even when read on the 
printed page, is pity-breeding. It is the tragedy 
of souls distraught. "She must not be dis- 
turbed," urges the venerable Arkel. "The 
human soul is very silent. . . . The human 
soul likes to depart alone. ... It suffers so 
timorously. . . . But the sadness, Golaud, the 
sadness of all we see. . . . J Twas a little being 
so quiet, so fearful, and so silent. 'Twas a poor 
little mysterious being like everybody." Pascal 
comes to the mind here. No matter the splen- 
dor of human lives, we must die alone. 

The speech of the poet in its rhapsodic rush 
merges into Debussy's music. That we shall 
ever see another such ensemble as at the Man- 
hattan Opera House years ago is doubtful. 
Mary Garden is Melisande. No further praise 
is needful. All her trumpery roles, Thais, Gis- 
monda, Cleopatre, with their insincere music 
and pasteboard pathos, are quickly dismissed. 
Her Melisande is unforgettable. 

MONNA VANNA 

.This opera was first heard here on February 
17, 1914, at the Metropolitan Opera House, 
with Mary Garden, Vanni Marcoux, and Huber- 
deau. It had been produced by the Boston 
Opera Company in December, 1913, and by the 

36 



MARY GARDEN 

present organization January 23, 1918. Miss 
Garden was the heroine on that occasion, and 
was greeted with overwhelming applause. The 
premiere of the play Monna Vanna occurred at 
the Nouveau Theatre, Paris, May 17, 1902. 
We had the good fortune to see it a week later. 
Georgette Leblanc was the original Monna. 
Jean Froment, Darmont, and Lugne Poe were 
the other principals. The drama enjoyed an 
immediate success all over Europe from Bergen 
to Palermo. London alone stood firm against 
its blandishments. The censor forbade a pro- 
duction. New York first saw it in English with 
Bertha Kalich at the old Standard Theatre, 
Harrison Gray Fiske, manager. 

As a play it was a new departure for Maeter- 
linck. It is almost theatric. In the heyday of 
his glory Sardou never devised anything more 
arresting than the denouement setting aside 
consideration of the psychologic imbroglio. 
There are spots in the dramatic scheme which 
tax the credulity. However, something of the 
improbable must always be granted a play- 
wright, be he never so logical. The rapid 
mental change of Vanna hints at a native-born 
casuist, an Italian Renaissance type of mind. 
Her love of Colonna could not have been deep- 
rooted. But she did not betray him in the 
tent, and yet she has been adjudged profoundly 
immoral; in a word, not to put an edge too fine 
upon the sophistries of the situation, this heroine 
committed an imaginative infidelity as well as 
37 



BEDOUINS 

uttering a splendid falsehood. The madness of 
the finale is the logical outcome of her passion 
for Prinzevalle. All that has gone before in her 
life had been a bad dream. The true, the beau- 
tiful moment is at hand. It will be both her 
revenge and justification. 

She goes to Prinzevalle in his cell. "This 
must end here; it is too perfect. ... It is one 
blaze about me and within me. . . . Oh, some 
death will run its sudden ringer round this spark 
and sever us from the rest!" Thus Browning 
sings In a Balcony. 

The play's the thing ! though it did not seem 
to catch the conscience of the composer. Nev- 
ertheless, Monna Vanna is more grateful to our 
ears than Gismonda. There are too many 
"things" that are set to music in the Sardou 
libretto, while Maeterlinck deals only with the 
primal passions love, jealousy, hatred, con- 
flict of wills. There is more unity in action and 
mood in the older score. The music is Wag- 
nerian'irom first to final curtain, but it is cleverly 
assimilated and swifter, more poignant. The 
introduction to the third act recalls the third 
act of Valkyrs; so we were not surprised to find 
Brunhilde pleading, or to hear the chorus shrilly 
cry out the Valkyr theme. In the tent scene, 
Tristan and Isolde reign, as might be expected. 
The first act has been cut and to its advantage. 

At our first view of Mary Garden as the medi- 
aeval Judith who fetches to Pisa her beloved 
Holofernes, we frankly confess that the impres- 

38 




prom a photograph copyrighted by Mishkin 

MARY GARDEN AS MONNA VANNA 



MARY GARDEN 

sions of her interpretation were strong. Monna 
Vanna will rank in her portrait-gallery among 
the finest. It far outshines Gismonda, as 
Monna herself outshines the incredible, erotic 
Duchess of Athens. There was no attempt to 
make a disrobing scandal in the tent scene, 
which would be obviously theatrical flimflam. 
Miss Garden disposed of the situation simply. 
She did not appear half-nude, but clothed in 
exquisitely- toned draperies. But if she did not 
show her lovely person, she spilled for us the 
soul of the heroine who saved her country and 
lost her reputation. In the opening act she did 
little, but suggested the psychology of a woman 
who had begun to loathe a supine husband. 
Note the nuance with which she uttered " J'rai, 
mon pere," and the repetition when she says it 
to Colonna. It was like molten steel at first; 
it was cold, rigid steel, the steel of unalterable 
resolution the second time. Yet how tender is 
her "Si" when she turns to her fuming spouse. 
There was tenderness in the tent scene, yes, 
true tenderness, not expressed by the senti- 
mental symbols of the English theatre, but in 
the restrained terms of the French tradition; 
therefore, more eloquent, more artistic, despair 
and pride modulating into amazed joyfulness at 
meeting her early friend, stern Prinzevalle. 
But the last scene gave us the most moving side 
of this wonderful woman's art. The shock of 
incredulity caused by her husband's suspicions, 
merging into the supreme ecstasy as she grasps 
39 



BEDOUINS 

\ 

the key that is to unlock the future in sooth; 
no such acting has been witnessed for a long 
time. The scale was essentially smaller than 
Bernhardt's, but as subtle as the art of Sarah 
were the indications of love triumphant with 
death staring her in the face. The tiny play of 
shadows round her eyes and mouth as she sees 
her lover trapped were touching. That she was 
a picture in every act is a matter of course. Her 
slow steps to the open door most impressive. 
It was a veritable march to the scaffold. Fev- 
rier's music in this last episode rings true. 



GISMONDA 

Of Mary Garden it is always the correct thing 
to say that she is charming. True. Charming, 
and also many other qualities she boasts. She 
is exquisite, and she is sometimes a great dra- 
matic artist. But her voice is a sonorous 
mirage. The lower register is still rich, sombre 
in coloring, thrilling when she wills. The gift 
of temperamental ecstasy is hers, though the 
character she paints so subtly is hardly worth 
the powder and shot to blow it sky-high. A 
sensual prowling panther, notwithstanding the 
al fresco exhibition of mother-love in Act I. 

The panther glides from its midnight jungle 
to meet its mate, and then Miss Garden's magic 
begins to operate. Her soliloquy is the finest 
bit of psychology expressed in voice, mimique, 
and with the entire arsenal of her personal 
40 



MARY GARDEN 

beauty that we have seen on any stage, dramatic 
or lyric, for years. She needs an intimate atmos- 
phere. Her diction, her phrasing, her general 
grasp of the r61e are most impressive. She has 
distinction in every pose, distinction in the car- 
riage of her head and arch of the neck. 

Her cadenced step in the first scene is replaced 
by rhythmic movements in the second act that 
reveal her glowing inner life. She is all flame 
and gold except when she sings above the 
staff. Even then she infuses it with a charac- 
teristic timbre. A singing-actress. People like 
Mary Garden because she has that rarest of 
artistic virtues personality. 



THAIS 

During the first week of last season's Chicago 
opera the temperament of Mary Garden was 
carefully chained in its cage; nevertheless, we 
overheard its growls in Gismonda, but the mock- 
Fafner at the bottom of the cistern outroared 
Miss Garden's tame panther. In Monna Vanna 
there were whimperings and menacing claws. 
The feline had no chance to spring, not even in 
the tent scene. At a matinee in the Lexington 
Theatre Thais was sung by the Chicago Opera 
Association, and now or never ! we said, the tem- 
perament so artistically expressed, rather canal- 
ized and exquisitely distributed, in the two other 
operas, will leap. It did. In the palace of Thais 
the panther appeared for a few moments and 



BEDOUINS 

it as'sumed the form of hysteria. The famous 
courtesan of Alexandria experienced a true " con- 
version," the physical manifestations of which 
were well-nigh pathological. "You have cre- 
ated a new shudder," wrote Victor Hugo to 
Charles Baudelaire after the production of his 
Flowers of Evil. The "nouveau frisson" of 
Miss Garden is thrilling, and must have appalled 
the well-meaning, stupid Athanael. 

This singing-actress does not widely depart 
from her usual interpretation, except that 
slight perpetual novelty which we expect 
from her. Her last scene is beautiful in con- 
ception and execution; the "spiritual" flirtation 
on the mossy bank as piously piquant as ever. 
The kiss suggested and evaded set us to won- 
dering again at the morose monk. In the early 
acts Thais is too restless. The firm yet plastic 
lines of the character are thereby disturbed. 
She looked lovelier than ever, and she did not 
sing in the best of voice. A trying week was 
behind her; besides, the domesticated panther 
must have tugged hard and frequently at its 
leash. 

CARMEN 

I attended Miss Garden's reading of the 
score for my first time, and freely admit my 
mixed feelings. We were assured by perfectly 
honorable lobbyists that the last season the 
Garden version was much better, more temper- 
amental; and one who had overheard her in 
42 



MARY GARDEN 

Paris swore that she was a seething caldron in 
Act II. Her interpretation seems to us to be 
"overpainted," to employ studio argot. Like 
the canvas in Balzac's Unknown Masterpiece, 
there is little left of the original design, except 
perhaps a miraculously painted foot. 

There were bits here and there that are ad- 
mirable; the slow awakening of her interest in 
the toreador as he thunders forth that supreme 
song of table d'hotes. We see some delicate and 
definitive notations, yet it is lost in the cloudy 
chaos of the scene. All the strong theatrical 
points are deliberately renounced; the first tu- 
multuous entrance, the Habanera, Seguidilla, 
and the duo in Act II. The renunciation sug- 
gests technical heroism, but it doesn't help us 
much in the development of the character. 

Her Carmen is essentially frigid. And it is 
neither sinister nor sensuous. To be sure, it is 
different, but then so is Hedda Gabler "differ- 
ent." We went to see, to hear, Carmen, and 
Hedda in a lyric mood was more often adum- 
brated than the Merimee-Bizet gypsy. The dis- 
turbing element of the performance was the un- 
deniable fact that, granted her idea of the r61e, 
she didn't even "get it across." She missed fire 
in Act III, in the card episode particularly. 
Nor did she look bewitching. We quite under- 
stand her avoidance of the conventional posing, 
hipping, strutting, and inane postures; yet there 
should have been compensations. (In the days 
of Calve the criticism was " Elle se hanche trop.") 
43 



BEDOUINS 

These were slim, not her singing, nor yet the 
beautiful shawl that might have been designed 
by Sorolla y Bastida. The famous fan we 
missed. If Mary Garden had but lavished a 
tithe of her blandishments on her Don Jose 
that she so recklessly, so alluringly bestowed 
upon Marc-Antoine Maguenat in Cleopatre, we 
might have been won over a little to her general 
conception. This Carmen was a distinguished 
dame. Lilli Lehmann alone outshone her in 
aristocratic Sevillian courtesy. But Lilli could 
sing. And Lilli had not the Aberdeen-cum 
Philadelphia-cum Chicago-aim Boston complex 
of Mary. 

We have since learned that the singer was 
grievously indisposed. And she surely missed 
the Don Jose of Dalmores and Muratore. 

And on this rather chilly note of dissent I pre- 
fer to end. Of Miss Garden's twenty or thirty 
other r61es it is hardly necessary to speak. Her 
Louise and Salome, so dissimilar, yet both in- 
comparable, need no belated praise. She is 
unique. Thus endeth the Book of Mary the 
Garden. 



44 



V 

MELISANDE AND DEBUSSY 

GEORGE MOORE has remarked that we never 
speak of Shakespeare or Hugo or Flaubert as 
the authors of any particular work. Simply to 
utter their names suffices. I give the illustra- 
tions haphazard. Any great artist will do. From 
Claude Debussy we never ask of what he is the 
composer. Pelleas and Melisande is his monu- 
ment; rather, Melisande and Pelleas; as, in the 
case of Isolde and Tristan, it is the woman who 
is protagonist. Is it because in creating charac- 
ters of our mother's sex that the Eternal Mascu- 
line is projected across the feminine soul? Or, 
is woman the genuine, the aboriginal force, that 
we unwittingly obey, all the while calling her 
"little woman"? (condescendingly, of course). 
Oh, what a joke of almost cosmical proportions 
it would be if the latter supposition be the truer 
one ! But mere male mortals may always con- 
sole themselves with the ineluctable fact that it 
is man who has endowed woman with a vital 
figure in the arts. He has created Ophelia and 
Gretchen, Beatrice and Francesca, the Milo 
Venus, the Winged Victory and Isolde, Lady 
Macbeth and Emma B ovary, Carmen and Me*li- 
sande. Honors, then, are even. Even if mod- 
45 



BEDOUINS 

els existed in nature, the art of man it was that 
shaped them and breathed life into their clay. 
But Melisande is the protagonist in the drama. 

The music to Maurice Maeterlinck's strangely 
haunting play is so wedded to the moods and 
situations that as absolute music it is unthink- 
able. And these moods are usually "con sor- 
dino." Despite his musicianship, Debussy is 
obviously a " literary" composer; his brain had 
first to be excited by a dramatic situation, a 
beautiful bouquet of verse, an episode in fiction, 
or the contemplation of a picture. 

Why demand if the initial impulse be the 
Monna Lisa or a quatrain by Verlaine? A 
composer who can interpret in tone the recon- 
dite moods of Baudelaire, Verlaine, Mallarme, or 
the dramatic prose-poem of Maeterlinck, need 
not have been daunted by criticism; in sooth, it 
is the angle of critical incidence that must be 
shifted to adapt itself to the new optique. Pel- 
leas and Melisande is a study in musical decom- 
position; the phrase is decomposed, rhythms are 
dislocated, the harmonic structure melts and re- 
solves itself into air. His themes are developed 
in opposition to the old laws of musical syntax. 
But what have laws in common with genius? 
Once assimilated, they may be broken as were 
broken the stone tablets by the mighty icono- 
clast, Moses. Besides, every law has its holiday. 
In the Debussy an idiom there seems to be no 
normal sequence. I say seems, for much water 
has gone under the bridge since his appearance, 



MfiLISANDE AND DEBUSSY 

and compared with Schoenberg, Stravinsky, 
Ornstein, and Prokofieff he is a conservative; in 
another decade he may be called a reactionary. 
Life is brief and art is swift. 

Our ears were not accustomed to his novel 
progressions and the forced marriage of har- 
monies. His tonalities are vague, but his values 
just. The introduction to the forest scene when 
Golaud discovers Melisande is of an acid sweet- 
ness. Without anxious preoccupation Debussy 
has caught the exact Maeterlinckian note. As 
it is impossible to divorce music and text De- 
bussy seems to be Maeterlinck's musical other 
self so it is needless to dwell upon the charac- 
teristic qualities of the score. It is like some 
antique and lovely tapestry that hypnotizes the 
gaze. It has the dream-drugged atmosphere of 
Edgar Allan Poe; the Poe of the dark tarn of 
Auber, of Ligeia, of Ellenora, of Berenice, and 
Helen, those frail apparitions from claustral 
solitudes and the Valley of the Many-Colored 
Grass, all as exotic as they are incorporeal. It 
is the complete envelopment of the poem by an 
atmospheric musical haze shot through with 
gleams of light never shown before on land or sea. 

We pardon the monotone of mood and music, 
the occasional muffled cacophonies, the lack of 
exterior action, and the absence of climaxes; after 
so long waiting for a passionate outburst, when 
it does come it is overpowering in its intensity. 
In music the tact of omission has never been 
pushed so far. From the pianoforte partition 
47 



BEDOUINS 

little may be gleaned of its poetic fervor, its 
reticences, its delicate landscapes, psychologic 
subtleties. The pattern seldom obtrudes, as the 
web is spun "exceeding fine." The orchestra- 
tion reveals the silver-greys of Claude Monet 
and the fire-tipped iridescence of Monticelli. 
His musical palette proclaims Debussy a sym- 
bolist, one in the key of Verlaine, who loved 
nuance for its own sake and detested flauntingly 
brilliant hues. "Pas la couleur, rien que la 
nuance . . . et tout le reste est litter a ture," 
sang Paul of the asymmetrical jaws and supernal 
thirst. 

Debussy is the most interesting of contem- 
porary music-makers and the most subtle com- 
poser for the pianoforte since Chopin. His 
originality is not profoundly rooted in the his- 
tory of his art, but his individuality is indis- 
putable. He is a musician doubled by a poet. 
He is almost as Gallic as Chopin is Polish. De- 
bussy shows race. His artistic pedigree stems 
from a grafting of old French composers upon 
ultramodern methods. Wagner, Chopin, cer- 
tain aspects of Liszt, and Moussorgsky. The 
visit he made to Russia in 1879 had important 
consequences. He read the manuscript score 
of Boris at Rome, he absorbed Moussorgsky 
and the whole-tone scale, and this influence 
contributed to the richness and complexity of 
his style. Above all, he is a stylist. He has 
Wagner at his finger-tips, and, like Charpentier, 
he can't keep Tristan out of his music; it is his 
48 



MfiLISANDE AND DEBUSSY 

King Charles's head. Naturally such highly 
peptonized aural diet is not nourishing. Like 
the poetry and prose-poems of Stephane Mal- 
larme, too much Debussy becomes trying to the 
nerves. Schumann has spoken of the singularly 
irritating effect of muted dissonances. Pelleas 
is nearly all muted. The mental and emotional 
concentration involved in the hearing of this 
music fatigues as does no other music; not even 
Tristan. 

The range of ideas, like the dynamic range, 
is limited. Yet there is magic in his music, 
the magic of evocation. Not to describe, but 
to evoke, in effortless imagery, is the quintes- 
sence of his art. He is a painter of cameos and 
aquarelles. Never does he carve from the big 
block; an exquisite miniaturist, he does not 
handle a bold brush, nor boast the epical sweep 
of his predecessors; Berlioz for one. But he is 
more intimate, he is the poet of crepuscular 
moods. The sadness of tender, bruised souls is 
in his pages. Of virility there is little trace, it 
is music of the distaff, and seldom sounds the 
masculine ring of crossed swords. Chopin, too, 
had his nocturnal moments, but he also wrote 
the A flat Polonaise, with its heroic defiance of 
a Poland crushed yet never conquered; with its 
motto: "Jescze Polska nie zginiela!" 

Long before his death this French master was 

critically ranged. Lawrence Oilman, the most 

sympathetic of his commentators, is also the 

fairest. To his essays I go for delectation. It 

49 



BEDOUINS 

would be rash to say that Debussy had achieved 
his artistic apogee; he may have had surprises in 
store, but it is safe to conclude that Pelleas and 
Melisande is his masterpiece, that the dewy 
freshness of L'Apres Midi d'un Faune would 
never have been recaptured. The symphonic 
suite, Printemps, the Nocturnes, La Mer, and 
Images, at once reveal the strength and limita- 
tions of Debussy, who was not a builder of the 
" lofty rhyme," though he is a creator of com- 
plex rhythms; not a cerebral composer like 
Vincent d'Indy, for example but an emotional 
one; not a master of linear design, but a colorist; 
a poet, not an architect. His vision is authen- 
tic. He knew that the core of reality is poetry; 
he lived not at the circumference but the 
hub of things. He loathed the academic. He 
is the antipodes of Saint-Saens. He gave us a 
novel nuance in music, as did Maeterlinck in 
literature. (Think of Interior with its motive 
again Poe the fear of fear !) Debussy is a 
composer of nuance, of half-hinted murmurings 
of "the silent thunder afloat in the leaves," of 
the rutilant faun with his metaphysical xeno- 
mania, of music overheard, and of mirrored 
dreams. Little wonder he sought to interpret 
in his weaving tones Baudelaire and Verlaine, 
Mallarme and Maeterlinck. He was affiliated 
to that choir of sensitive and unhappy souls, of 
which Maurice Maeterlinck is the solitary survi- 
vor. A poet himself, Claude Achille Debussy, 
even if he had never written a bar of music. 
So 



MfiLISANDE AND DEBUSSY 

One summer evening in 1903 I was intro- 
duced to him at a cafe on the Boulevard des 
Italiens. Debussy spoke a few polite words 
when I told him that I belonged to the critical 
chain-gang. He had written much musical 
criticism, chiefly memorable for its unsympa- 
thetic attitude toward Schubert and Wagner, 
not because of reasons chauvinistic, but doubt- 
less the result of a natural reaction against the 
principal educative forces in his life. At least 
once in his career an artist curses his artistic 
progenitors. Wagner must have hated Weber 
because of his borrowings from him, and I am 
quite sure Chopin despised Hummel; internal 
evidence may be collated in the Pole's wide de- 
parture from the academic patterns of Hum- 
mel's passage-work. However, Debussy never 
went so far as his friend Jean Marnold, who in 
the Mercure de France concludes a comparative 
study of Pelleas and Tristan in these words: 
"Le pathos de Tristan vient trop tard; si tard, 
qu'il semble aujourd'hui, a sa place adequate en 
notre Opera toulousain." Yet if Tristan came 
so late, how is it that there is so much of its 
music in Pelleas ? a fact that Philip Hale doubts. 
There's the score. Who steals my idea steals 
trash; 'tis something, nothing; 'twas mine, 'tis 
his, and has been slave to thousands; but he 
that filches from me my style robs me of that 
which not enriches him and makes me poor 
indeed ! (This is reorchestrated to suit the 
simile.) Tristan always seems to be waiting in 



BEDOUINS 

the wings when Pelleas is played, awaiting his cue 
to enter. It never fails to be given by Debussy. 
Later I asked Maurice Maeterlinck his opin- 
ion of Debussy's music to Pelleas and Melisande. 
It was an imprudent question, for Lucienne Bre- 
val had captured the r61e of Melisande, not 
Georgette Leblanc. Maeterlinck is a polite 
man, and his answer was guarded; never- 
theless, his dislike of the music pierced his 
phrases. To him it was evident that his play 
needed no tonal embellishment, that it was 
more poetic, more dramatic, without the De- 
bussy frame. He is quite right. And yet the 
spiritual collaboration of poet and musician is 
irresistible. And in the garden of the gods 
there is only one Melisande. Some little dramas, 
like little books, have their destiny. The com- 
poser of Pelleas and Melisande suffered from 
the nostalgia of the ideal, suffered from home- 
sickness for his patrie psychique, the land of 
fantasy and evanescent visions. The world will 
not willingly forget him. 



VI 
THE ARTISTIC TEMPERAMENT' 

IT was twenty minutes to Eternity on a sunny 
morning in Gotham. The breakfast room was 
large, airy, and the view of upper Manhattan 
from the various windows gave one a joyous 
sense of our quotidian life, its variety and spa- 
ciousness. Central Park, a square of dazzling 
emerald, the erect golden synagogue on the 
avenue, the silver hubs of the wheels on passing 
carriages across the East Drive, were pictures 
for eyes properly attuned. The four eyes, how- 
ever, in this particular apartment, were busily 
engaged in devouring, not the dainty breakfast 
spread before them eyes eat, too but the 
morning newspapers. On the walls were framed 
photographs. She as Juliet. He as Tristan. 
She as Isolde. He as Faust. She, Carmen. 
He, Siegfried. A versatile pair. Theirs had 
been a marriage prompted by love. A mag- 
nificent, a devastating passion had amalgamated 
their destinies Paul Bourget would have said 
"sublimes." They still loved despite the poign- 
ant promiscuity of matrimony, although mar- 
ried nearly a year. They also loved others. 
And in the morning hours they hated one an- 
other with the holy hatred engendered by per- 
53 



BEDOUINS 

feet sympathy. And they were so consumedly 
happy that they couldn't stay indoors for a day. 
It is easy to love fervidly; it is hard to hate in- 
telligently. On one point, however, this won- 
derful soprano and glorious tenor were united 
they despised musical criticism, even when it 
was unfavorable. Banishing Mildred, the pretty 
English maid she was too pretty about six in 
the evening, so He noticed to the bedroom, 
they read the newspapers undisturbed. They 
read aloud, and occasionally as a duet. She 
freely embroidered her commentaries. He em- 
bellished his with indignant outbursts. 

"Dearest, hear this. What a beautiful notice 
from Spoggs. I appreciate it all the more be- 
cause he was once epris of that Garden woman. 
I honestly believe the man is truly in love with 
me." "Pooh! Sweetheart, a music-critic has 
only ink and ice- water in his veins. Spoggs is 
in love with his hifalutin' phrases. All the rest 
is cannonading canaries. If he saw you in the 
right key he would never speak of your second- 
act Isolde. That's just where you fall down, dar- 
ling. Whereas my third-act Tristan "Dear 
old boy. How you do run on. Always jeal- 
ous when his poor little wine is praised." "I 
jealous ? Of you ! " Longa pausa ! Suddenly 
she exclaims: "Oh, you poor man! Did you 
read what he said of your make-up last night? 
I hate that man now. He is so unjust to you; 
though he does admire me. Why, what's the 
54 



THE ARTISTIC TEMPERAMENT 

matter, baby? Where are you going? Your 
coffee is cold " He storms out of the room, 
stumbling over Mildred on her knees near the 
door, either praying or polishing the keyhole 
with her lustrous eyelashes. Familiarity may 
breed contempt, but contiguity breeds, tout 
simple. 

It really happened. In this instance I have 
transposed the key to opera. The true story 
deals with a well-known actress and her first 
husband, also her leading man. Two prima 
donnas under one roof. She read him to his 
death with unfavorable criticisms. I know of a 
more curious case. He was an idealist of an 
idealism so lofty that he often stumbled over 
the stars, enmeshed himself in constellations 
and took the sun for footstool. Her eyes, young 
as yesterday, were like an Irish sea-green moun- 
tain lake; at dusk, a sombre pool, profound at 
dawn as a sun-misted emerald. He painted. 
She sang. He painted her portrait. Then he 
painted other women's portraits. Each por- 
trait he painted was the portrait of his wife. 
She was beautiful. At first society was amused, 
flattered, and finally resented the unsought com- 
pliment. Time drove the enamored couple 
asunder. They were too happy. She married 
again, happily. He remarried. I saw the last 
portrait he had painted of his second wife, a 
lovely creature. As in a pictorial palimpsest 
the features of his first wife showed in the new 
text; the expression of her eyes peeped through 
55 



BEDOUINS 

the other woman's eyes. A veritable obsession 
this, comparable to the exquisite and melan- 
choly tale of Georges Rodenbach and the dear 
dead woman of Bruges-la-Morte. 

What is the artistic temperament so-called? 
Years ago I wrote to great lengths of "The 
Artist and His Wife," quoting ancient saws and 
modern instances to fatten my argument that 
artistic people are, in private life, very much 
like others; if anything, more human. I proved, 
by a string of names beginning with the Robert 
Brownings and the Robert Schumanns, that 
artists may marry or mix without fear of sudden 
death, cross words, bad cookery, rocky behavior, 
or diminution of their artistic powers. "There 
are no women of genius," said that cross-patch 
celibate, Edmond de Goncourt; "the only 
women of genius are men." A half-truth and a 
whole lie. Artistic men are as "catty" as the 
"cattiest" women. But why dwell only upon 
the incompatibility of artists? Doesn't Mr. 
Worldly Wiseman sometimes weary of his stout 
spouse? Why does the iceman in the adjacent 
alley beat the skinny mother of his children? 
Or why does a woman who never heard of Nora 
Helmer, Hedda Gabler, or Anna Karenina leave 
her husband, her family, not for the love of a 
cheap histrion, but because she thinks she can 
achieve fame as a "movie" actress? Is it not 
the call of the exotic, the far-away and unfamil- 
iar ? A woman can't live alone on stone without 
the bread of life at intervals. The echoes of 

56 



THE ARTISTIC TEMPERAMENT 

wanderlust are heard in the houses of bankers, 
tailors, policemen, politicians, as well as in the 
studies of artists, poets, and musicians. 

But the artist's misdemeanors get into print 
first. The news is published early and often. 
A beautiful young actress, or a rising young 
portrait-painter, a gifted composer, talented 
sculptor, rare poet, brilliant pianist, versatile 
writer when one of these strays across the bar- 
rier into debatable territory, the watchmen on 
the moral towers lustily beat their warning 
gongs. It is prime matter for headlines. To 
the winds strong lungs bawl the naked facts. 
Depend upon it no matter who escapes the 
public hue and cry, the artist is always found 
out and his peccadilloes proclaimed from pulpits 
or yawped over the roofs of the world. Why, 
you ask, should a devotee of aesthetic beauty 
ever allow his feet to lead him astray? Here 
comes in your much-vaunted, too-much-dis- 
cussed artistic temperament odious phrase! 
Hawked about the market-place, instead of 
reposing in the holy of holies, this temperament 
has become a byword and a stench in the nos- 
trils. Every coney-catcher, prizefighter, or co- 
cotte takes refuge behind "art." It is become 
a name accursed. When the tripesellers of lit- 
erature wish to rivet public attention upon 
their wares, they cry aloud: "Lo, the artistic 
temperament!" If an unfortunate woman is 
arrested she is usually described in the police- 
blotter as an "actress." If a fellow and his 
57 



BEDOUINS 

wife tire of too much bliss, their "temperaments" 
are aired in the courts. Worse "affinities" are 
dragged in. Decent folk shudder and your 
genuine artist does not boast of his "artistic 
temperament." It has become gutter-slang. 
It is a synonym for rotten "nerves." 

A true artist abhors the ascription^of tempera- 
ment, keeping within the sanctuary of his soul 
the ideal that is the mainspring of his creation. 
The true artist temperament is, in reality, the 
perception and appreciation of beauty, whether 
in pigment, form, tone, words, nature, or in the 
loftier region of moral rectitude. It may exist 
coevally with a strong religious sense. And it 
may be gayly pagan. But always for the serious 
artist the human body is the temple of the Holy 
Ghost, as Mother Church, profoundest of psy- 
chologists, has taught. The dignity of men 
and women dare be violated only at the peril of 
their immortal souls. The artistic temperament 
adds new values to everv-day life and character. 
But its possessor must not parade this personal 
quality as an excuse for self-indulgence. That 
he leaves to the third-rate artisan, to the char- 
latan, to the buffoon who grins through a horse 
collar, to the vicious who shield their vileness 
behind a torrid temperament. Now, art and 
sex are correlated. Sex is the salt of life. Art 
without sex is flavorless, hardly art at all, a 
frozen simulacrum. All great artists are virile. 
And their greatness consists in the victory over 
their temperaments; not in the triumph of mind 



THE ARTISTIC TEMPERAMENT 

over matter futile phrase but in a synthesis, 
the harmonious comminglement of intellect and 
artistic material. Sensualist your artist may 
be, but if he is naught else, then his technical 
virtuosity avails him not. He cannot achieve 
artistic grandeur. The noblest art is the tri- 
umph of imagination over temperament. 

Too often a rainbow mirage is this entering 
into wedlock of two congenial souls. 

When He whispers it is the marrying month 
of June and the moon swims above in the tender 
blue "Why, dear, it is just as easy for two to 
live as one on fifty dollars a week," the re- 
cording angel smiles, then weeps. Nor has the 
hardy young adventurer spiders on his ceiling. 
He dares to be a fool, and that is the first step 
in the path of wisdom. But She? Oh, She is 
enraptured. Naturally they will economize; 
occasional descents into cheap Bohemias; saw- 
dust, pink wine, pinker wit, pinkest women. 
No new gowns. No balls. No theatres. No 
operas. No society. It is only to be Art, Art, 
Art! So they bundle their incompatible tem- 
peraments before an official and are made one. 
At least they are legally hitched. She plays 
the piano. He paints. A wonderful vista, 
hazy with dreams, spreads before them. She 
will teach a few pupils, keep up her practice, 
and save enough to study some day with a 
pupil of a pupil of Leschetizky. He will man- 
fully paint, yes, a few portraits, though land- 
scape is his ambition. But it is hard to resist 
59 



BEDOUINS 

the bribes of our dear common life. They try, 
they fail. 

A year passes. What a difference ! Gone are 
the dreams. There are many spiders on the 
ceiling now. To pay for the food they eat, to 
own the roof over their heads, are their ultimate 
desires. She looks paler. He may or may not 
drink; it doesn't much matter. There are no 
portraits painted; an artist must be doubled by 
a society man to capture commissions, to enjoy 
the velvet vulgarities of the new-rich. And 
artists demand too much of their wives. She 
must be a social success; also a combination of 
cook and concubine. Women are versatile. 
Women are born actresses. It was a woman, 
not a man, who discovered the art of leading a 
double life on ten dollars a week. But on thrice 
that amount they can't run a household, watch 
the baby oh, wretched intruder! play like 
Fannie Bloomfield Zeisler, and look like an 
houri. To be a steam-heated American beauty, 
your father must be a billionaire. 

The artist-woman is a finely attuned fiddle. 
You may mend a fiddle, but not a bell, says 
Ibsen. True, but if you smash your fiddle the 
music is mute. And every day of fault-finding 
snaps a string, or reduces its tautness. How 
long does beauty endure? Begin misunder- 
standings. Pity, the most subtly cruel of the 
Seven Deadly Virtues, stalks the studio. Se- 
cretly She pities him. Secretly He pities her. 
Pity breeds hatred. Difference develops dis- 
60 



THE ARTISTIC TEMPERAMENT 

content. At breakfast, the most trying time of 
the twenty-four hours oh, the temperamental 
breakfasts when we were young and delightfully 
miserable ! even when you haven't anything to 
eat at breakfast, He pities her flushed face as 
She runs in from the kitchen with eggs and 
coffee. No longer is She a sylph in his eyes. 
The fifty dollars a week seem shrunken, not 
enough for one to live upon, much less two or 
three. She pities him because He is flushed 
from his night's outing. His appetite, like his 
temper, is capricious. In her eyes He is the 
ordinary male brute (feed the brute!). Then 
He becomes imprudent and flings Schopenhauer 
at her head. That old humbug of a misogynist, 
who was always elbow-deep in woman scrapes ! 
But She has no time to retort with Ibsen and 
Shaw for his swift discomfiture. The milkman 
is dunning her, and as baby must have pure 
milk She smiles at her foolish young man and 
teases him for the money. He looks blankly 
at her as He dives into empty pockets. This 
sort of thing may last for years. In reckless 
despair He may throw his lamp at the moon, 
She her bonnet over the windmill. Female suf- 
frage will make such conditions impossible in 
the future by forbidding men the ballot. Like 
a sensible shoemaker let him stick to his last, or, 
to shift the image, let him grind the handle of 
the domestic barrel-organ while She collects 
the coppers. 

It is when the lean years are upon the philan- 
61 



BEDOUINS 

dering artist, the years of thin thoughts and 
bleak regrets, that he may miss the loving wives 
of his past. Then will he cry in the stillness of 
his heart: O Time! Eternal shearer of souls, 
spare me thy slow clippings. Shear me in haste, 
shear me closely ! You see, he remains the lit- 
erary artist, and in the face of death he wears 
his shop mask. His artistic affinity, encoun- 
tered late in their earthly pilgrimage, congratu- 
lates herself that her latter lonesome years won't 
be burdened by the ills and whims and senile 
vanity of an old man. She may be a spinster 
and boast the artistic temperament. Or she 
may escape that fate by marrying a sensible 
business or professional man, who pays the 
freight and admires her pasty painting, her 
facile, empty music-making, her unplayed plays, 
unread verse and novels that are privately 
printed. Thus doth Nature hit the happy 
mean. He who could hold hands with a pretty 
girl in eleven languages consoles himself with 
his corroded memories. After all, has he not 
been a success, has he not eluded entangling 
matrimonial alliances? Ah, the artistic tem- 
perament ! 

During a certain London silly season some 
enterprising imbecile posed this query: Can a 
woman on the boards remain virtuous? This 
absurd question set Great Britain buzzing. His 
Grace the Archbishop answered, and every 
Tom, Dick, and Harry rushed into type to record 
their precious opinions. The theatrical profes- 
62 



THE ARTISTIC TEMPERAMENT 

sion rose as a single woman. Mrs. Kendal and 
Mary Anderson were held up as shining pat- 
terns, which they are. But there were many 
sceptics. George Moore's Mummer Worship 
was hurled at the camp of the optimists. Ra- 
chel, Sarah Bernhardt, and Duse were adduced 
by the pessimists. Finally it occurred to the 
one intelligent person in all London to interview 
George Bernard Shaw. 

"Mr. Shaw, do you think a woman can be 
virtuous in the theatre?" 

"Why should she be?" asked St. George, 
and then and there the moral symposium went 
up in a burst of uncontrolled laughter. Mr. 
Shaw is like the little candid girl in the crowd; 
for him the truth is always naked. So is the 
artistic temperament. 



VII 

THE PASSING OF OCTAVE 
MIRBEAU 

OCTAVE MIRBEAU was a prodigious penman. 
When Remy de Gourmont called Paul Adam 
"a magnificent spectacle" he might have said 
with equal propriety the same of Mirbeau. A 
spectacle and a stirring one it is to watch the 
workings of a powerful, tumultuous brain such 
as Mirbeau's. He was a tempestuous force. 
His energy electric. He could have repeated 
the exclamation of Anacharsis Clootz: "I belong 
to the pdrty of indignation!" His whole life 
Mirbeau was in a ferment of indignation over 
the injustice of life, of literature, of art. His 
friends say that he was not a revolutionist born; 
nevertheless, he ever seemed in a pugnacious 
mood, whether attacking society, the Govern- 
ment, the Institutes, the theatre, the army or 
religion. There is no doubt that certain tem- 
peraments are uneasy if not in opposition to 
existing institutions, and while his sincerity was 
indisputable an imperious sincerity, a sincerity 
that was perilously nigh an obsession Mirbeau 
seemed possessed by the mania of contradiction. 
After his affiliations with Jules Valles and the 
anarchistic group he was nicknamed "Mira- 
64 



THE PASSING OF OCTAVE MIRBEAU 

beau," and, indeed, there was in him much of 
the fiery and disputatious, though he never in 
oratory recalled the mighty revolutionist. Nev- 
ertheless, he was a prodigious penman. 

He was born in Normandy, 1850 (Ernest Gau- 
bert says 1848), the country of those two 
giants, Gustave Flaubert and Barbey d'Aure- 
villy. He died early in 1917. His Odyssey, 
apart from his writings, was not an exciting one. 
Well born and well educated, he took a violent 
dislike to his clerical instructors, and as may 
be noted in Sebastien Roch (1890), he suffered 
from the result of a shock to his sensibilities be- 
cause of an outrageous occurrence in the course 
of his school years. He early went to Paris, 
like many another ambitious young man, and 
began as an art-critic, but his first article on 
Monet, Manet, and Cezanne was also his last 
in the journal VOrdre; it created so much scan- 
dal by its attack on those mud-gods of art, Meis- 
sonier, Cabanel, Lefebvre and Bouguereau, that 
he was drafted into the dramatic department. 
There he did not last long. After a violent dia- 
tribe against the House of Moliere he found 
himself with several duels on his hands and 
enjoyed the distinction of a personal reply from 
Coquelin. He wrote for a little review Les 
Grimaces, and in 1891 defended Jean Grave's 
La Societe Mourante and composed a preface 
for that literary firebrand. He had dipped into 
the equivocal swamp of politics and had been 
a sous-prefet (at St. Girons, 1877), but the expe- 
65 



BEDOUINS 

rience did not lend enchantment to his patriot- 
ism. He saw the inner machinery of a democ- 
racy greasy with corruption and it served him 
as material for his political polemics. 

His first decade in Paris he wrote for such 
publications as Ckroniques Parisiennes, La 
France, Gaulois, and Figaro. The entire gamut 
of criticism was achieved by him. He was fear- 
less. His pen was vitriolic and also a sledge- 
hammer. Like old Dr. Johnson, if his weapon 
missed fire he brained his adversary with its 
butt-end. A formidable antagonist, yet the 
obverse of his medal shows us a poet of ab- 
normal sensibilities, a leather of all injustice, a 
Quixote tilting at genuine giants, not missing 
windmills; also a man of great literary endow- 
ment and achievement. His critics speak of a 
period of discouragement during which he 
smoked opium, though without ill consequences. 
His was not a passive temperament to endure 
inaction. Like others, he had perversely imi- 
tated Baudelaire and De Quincey, but soon gave 
up the attempt. A nature trembling on the 
verge of lytic pantheism and truculent satire, 
Mirbeau had a hard row to hoe, and it is gratify- 
ing to learn that as he conquered in his art so 
he conquered himself. He waged war against 
Octave Mirbeau to the last. And no wonder. 
He has written stories that would bring a crim- 
son blush to the brow of Satan. 

Turning the pages of the principal Paris re- 
views to which he copiously contributed we find 
66 



THE PASSING OF OCTAVE MIRBEAU 

him calling the financial press blackmailers; the 
law reporters "vermine judiciaire"; French jour- 
nalism decidedly decadent: "The press kills lit- 
erature, art, patriotism; it aggrandizes the shop 
and develops the shopkeeping spirit. It exalts 
the mediocre painters, sculptors, writers. Its 
criticism is venal." As for the theatre from 
the frying-pan into the fire ! The theatre is the 
prey of mediocrity, wherein Le Maitre de Forges 
is pronounced a masterpiece ! 

The comedians ("les tripots revenus; caboti- 
nisme") of La Comedie Frangaise come in for 
their share. Emile Zola, naturally enough, has 
his allegiance, but he dealt hard raps on the 
skulls of his followers, the Zolaettes, who hung 
on the fringe of the novelist's dressing-gown. 
He admired Barbey d'Aurevilly and Elemir 
Bourges, as well he might; he attacked Daudet, 
Paul Bourget, Ohnet, Legouve, Feuillet, Sarcey 
dear old Uncle Sarcey, how Huysmans and 
Mirbeau did pound him ! and, last and worst, 
the art-critic of the Figaro, Albert Wolff. But 
he deserved the flaying. 

In La Presse Mirbeau saluted the genius of 
Rodin, Maupassant, and praised Paul Hervieu. 
He adored Victor Hugo, not only as supreme 
poet but as humanitarian the very quality that 
to-day so many find monotonous in his lyrics. 
But there was more than a strain of humanitari- 
anism in Mirbeau. He was truly a Brother to 
Man, but he never exploited it as do sentimental 
socialists. It was the spectacle of poverty, of 



BEDOUINS 

the cruelty of man to man, of the cruelty to 
animals he wrote a novel about a dog that 
set the blood boiling in his veins and forced him 
to utter terrible, regrettable phrases. His 
friends grieved, yet^the'spectacle was not unlike a 
volcano in action. That all this was prejudicial 
to the serenity of his art is not to be doubted. 
Mirbeau cared little. Let art perish if he 
accomplished a reform! Yet he has written 
some almost perfect pages, and in the presence 
of nature his angry soul was soothed, ennobled. 
A poet was slain in him before his vision became 
voice. He loved the figure of Christ and he 
drifted into the mystic and lovable theories of 
Kropotkine, Elisee Reclus, and Tolstoy. Their 
influence is manifested in his Lettres de ma 
Chaumire (1886). These tales overflow with 
sympathy and indignation. The French peas- 
ant as he is, neither idealized by Millet nor cari- 
catured by Zola, is painted here with an intimate 
brush it is painted miasma, one is tempted to 
add. That he was an unyielding Dreyfusard is 
a matter of history. 

It may be said in passing that Mirbeau had 
not the stuff in him to make a sound or satisfac- 
tory critic of the Fine Arts. He was too one- 
sided in his Salons, his enthusiasms were often 
ill-placed, and he resembled Zola in his vocabu- 
lary of abuse if any one disagreed with him. 
M. Durand-Ruel, where he was liked for his 
sterling qualities, has a pamphlet of Mirbeau's 
on the Impressionists. Published here it would 
68 



THE PASSING OF OCTAVE MIRBEAU 

have resulted either in a libel suit or a prosecu- 
tion for obscenity. His definitionof a certain art- 
critic is unprintable. When he hated he stopped 
short of nothing. A true Celt. But how he 
could tune down the peg of the false heroic to 
make sound the mean music of mean souls! 
There are a dozen men in Paris who were riddled 
by his shot and shell. He did not spare the 
Government and told some wholesome truths 
about the Tonkin affair. But he was not all 
fire and fury. He had intellectual charity, and 
the artist in him often prevailed. He was de- 
structive, and he could be constructive. He 
could be charming and tender, too, and his style 
ranged from thunder-words to supple-sweet 
magic. 

The constructive in him was artistic, but 
when the propagandist reins were between his 
teeth his judgments were muddied by his 
turbulence. And how clearly he could judge 
was proved by his clairvoyant article in Le 
Figaro on an unknown Belgian, by name Maurice 
Maeterlinck (1890). Mirbeau literally discov- 
ered Maeterlinck; and while we now smile over 
the title of " Belgian Shakespeare/ 7 there is no 
denying the flair of the Parisian critic. Cer- 
tainly he made a better guess than the amusing 
Max Nordau, who once described the author of 
The Treasures of the Humble as "a pitiable 
mental cripple." In 1888 L'Abbe Jules ap- 
peared. It was Mirbeau's first novel. For the 
chief character he went to his uncle, a priest of 

69 



BEDOUINS 

rather singular traits. The book became a burn- 
ing scandal. 

Le Calvaire (1887) confirmed the reputation 
of the young writer. He certainly had a predi- 
lection "pour la poesie de la pourriture," as one 
critic puts it. But Calvary is a masterpiece 
and his least offensive fiction. The story of the 
little soldier who shoots an Uhlan in the war of 
1870 and then tries to revive the dead man, 
finally kissing him on the forehead as a testi- 
mony of his fraternal feeling, is touching. S6- 
bastien Roch, the third novel, is full of verity 
and power only marred by a page, one of the 
most hideous in French fiction (irrespective of 
avowedly crapulous stories). But Mirbeau has 
testified to its truth elsewhere. The hero be- 
comes a victim to aboulia, or the malady of 
doubt. Happiness is not for him and he dies 
in the Franco-Prussian conflict. Le Jardin des 
Supplices (1899) set Paris cynically shivering 
with a new sensation. This garden of tortures 
is the most damnably cruel book in contempo- 
rary fiction. It was conceived by a Torque- 
mada of sadism. Yet Mirbeau disclaimed any 
notion of writing for mere notoriety. These 
sombre pages of blood and obscenity were 
printed to show the cruelty and injustice of all 
Governments. The Chinese were selected as 
masters of the most exquisite tortures. A vile 
nightmare is the result. It demands strong 
nerves to read it once through; a rereading 
70 



THE PASSING OF OCTAVE MIRBEAU 

would seem incredible. Swift is in comparison 
an ironical comedian. 

Les Memoires d'une Femme de Chambre 
(1901) is backstairs gossip, though the purpose 
is not missing; again satire of the better classes, 
so-called. Les vingt-et-un jours d'un Neur- 
asthenique (1902) need not detain us, nor such 
one-act pieces as Vieux Menage (1901), Amanto 
(1901), Scrupules (1902), or Le Foyer, with 
Natanson (1908). He also wrote a preface to 
Margaret Andoux's story, Marie Claire. The 
first important dramatic work of Mirbeau was 
Les Mauvais Bergers, in five acts, produced at 
the Theatre de la Renaissance (December 14, 
1897). We can still evoke the image of Sarah 
Bernhardt in the last act, an act charged with 
pity and irony. The play, because of its politi- 
cal and social currents, created a dolorous and 
profound impression. The work has in it some- 
thing of both The Conquest of Bread and The 
Weavers. In Les Affaires sont les Affaires, pro- 
duced at the Theatre Frangais (April 20, 1903), 
Mirbeau is at his satirical best. The play has 
been shown here, but in a colorless, unconvinc- 
ing style. In De Feraudy's hands the character 
of Isidore Lechat, both a type and an individual 
one of our modern captains of industry (in the 
old days, a chevalier of industry?) was per- 
fectly exhibited. After witnessing in June of the 
same year a performance of this bitterly satirical 
comedy I met the author, who appeared as 



BEDOUINS 

mUd-inannered a pirate as ever cut a poet or 
scuttled a ship of State. 

Paul Hervieu told me at the time that the 
bark of this old growling mastiff was worse than 
his bite; but his victims did not believe this. 
He was, in his dynamic prime, the best-hated 
publicist in all Paris and that is saying a lot, 
for there were also Barbey d'Aurevilly, Ernst 
Hello, Louis Veuillot, J. K. Huysmans and sev- 
eral other virtuosi in the noble art of making 
foes. Decidedly, Mirbeau was not a lagger be- 
hind those pamphleteers and dealers in corrosive 
verbal values. 

That he could be human was shown in his 
vertiginous automobile story La 628-E8, where, 
after retelling what Victor Hugo had hinted at 
in his Choses vues, Mirbeau made an apology 
to the daughter or was it granddaughter? of 
Mme. Hanska Balzac for a certain chapter 
which relates the Russian lady's doings on the 
heels of her great husband's death. Mirbeau 
was not legally compelled to withdraw this 
chapter, as it was a thrice-told tale in Paris, but 
a friend explained to him the lady's distress 
and he promptly made the only amend he could. 
This man had also a prodigious heart. 



72 



VIII 
ANARCHS AND ECSTASY 

LEST we forget. While competition is the 
life of cocottes, the rival opera companies that 
fill the air of Gotham with their lyric cries 
offer to the truly musical only the choice be- 
tween two despairs; with our accustomed happy 
indecision we prefer Leopold Godowsky to 
Puccini. We frankly confess our love of sym- 
phonic music, and would rather listen to a Bee- 
thoven string quartet played by the Flonzaleys 
than all the operas ever written; the majority of 
them depicting soul-states in a sanatorium. 
However, there is the charm of aversion, and 
that piques the curious. Music in opera is 
prodigal, never generous. It is the too-much 
that appalls. It is as reticent as a female poli- 
tician and a hundredfold more attractive. Fly- 
ing fish, these singing-actors. They needs must 
swim and fly. Winged fish, birds with fins. It 
is an ambiguous art, the operatic, and it is de- 
vised to tickle the ears, dazzle the eyes, of the 
unmusical and myopic. It breeds personal gos- 
sip, never thought. For God's sake, let us sit 
upon the ground and tell sad stories of Mary 
Garden's celebrated eyebrows! (This modern 
instance, for Mary always goes first, as Henry 
73 



BEDOUINS 

Arthur of the Jones family would say, does not 
necessitate Shakespearean quotation marks.) 
From Bach to Scriabin, have not all composers 
been anarchs ? At first blush the plodding John 
Sebastian Bach of the Ill-Tempered Clavichord 
seems a dubious figure with which to drape the 
red flag of revolt. He grew a forest of children. 
He taught early and late. He played the organ 
in church of Sundays. Nevertheless, his music 
proves him a revolutionist. And, like any good 
social democrat, he quarrelled with his surround- 
ings. He even went out for a drink during a 
prosy sermon all sermons are necessarily prosy, 
else they wouldn't be sermons and was almost 
discharged by his superiors for returning late; a 
perpetual warning to thirsty organists. If Lom- 
broso had been cognizant of this suspicious fact 
he would have built a terrific structure of de- 
generation theories with all sorts of inferential 
subcellars. Stranger still, the music of Bach 
remains as revolutionary as the hour it was 
written. No latter-day composer has gone so 
far as some of his fantasies. Mozart and Gluck 
depended too much on aristocratic patronage 
to play the r61es of anarchs; yet tales are extant 
of their refusal to lick the boots of the mighty 
or curve the spine of the suppliant. Handel! 
A fighter, a revolutionist born, a hater of ty-: 
rants. And the most virile among musicians 
except the peasant Beethoven since the recent 
war become a Belgian composer ! His contempt 
for rank and its entailed snobberies was like a 
74 



ANARCHS AND ECSTASY 

blow from a muscular fist. Haydn need not be 
considered. He was a henpecked Croatian, and 
strange stories are related of this merry little 
blade, truly a chamber-music husband. Men- 
delssohn was Bach watered down for general 
consumption. Schubert and Schumann were 
anarchs, but the supreme anarch of art was 
Beethoven, who translated into daily practice 
the radicalism of his music. 

Because of its opportunities for the expansion 
of the soul, music has ever attracted the strong 
free sons of the earth. It is, par excellence, the 
art masculine. The profoundest truths, the 
most blasphemous ideas, may be incorporated 
within the walls of a symphony, and the police 
none the wiser. Think of Chopin and Tchai- 
kovsky and the arrant doctrines they preached. 
It is its freedom from the meddlesome hand of 
the censor that has made of music a playground 
for brave hearts. In his Siegfried and under 
the long nose of royalty Richard Wagner 
preached anarchy, put into tone, words, ges- 
tures, attitudes, lath, plaster, paint, and canvas, 
pronouncements so terrible that the Old Man 
of the Mountain, as Bernard Shaw calls Gov- 
ernment, if it but knew, would forbid his music, 
not because it was penned by a German, but 
because it is inimical to tyranny, therefore the 
most democratic music ever composed. 

Chopin presents us with a psychic "equiva- 
lent of war," as William James has put it, in 
portions of his music, notably the polonaises; 
75 



BEDOUINS 

while Richard Strauss has buried more bombs 
in his work than ever Chopin with his cannon 
smothered in roses, or Bakounine and his nihilis- 
tic prose. Liszt, midway in his mortal lif e, was 
bitten by the socialistic theories of Saint-Simon, 
and, though a silken courtier, he was an inno- 
vator in his music. Brahms was a free-thinker 
and a democrat, but closely hugged the classic 
line and seldom strayed from the boundaries of 
his Romantic park. Berlioz, Hector of the 
Flaming Locks, was, his life long, a fiery indi- 
vidualist. He would have made a picturesque 
figure waving a blood-red flag on the barricades. 
His fantastic symphony is charged with the 
tonal commandments of anarchy. Richard 
Wagner may not have shouldered a musket 
during the Dresden uprising of 1849, yet he was, 
with Roeckel and Bakounine, one of its inspirers. 
Luckily for us he ran away, else Tristan 
might have remained in the womb of eternal 
silence. Wagner may be called the Joseph 
Proudhon among composers; his music is anar- 
chy incarnate, passionately deliberate, like the 
sad and logical music we find in the great 
Frenchman's Philosophy of Misery (by the way, 
a subtitle). His very scheme of harmonization 
is the symbol of a soul insurgent in the music of 
Richard Strauss. And what shall we say to the 
exquisite anarchy of Debussy and Ravel? To 
the cerebral insurrection of Schoenberg? To 
the devastating sirocco blasts of Scriabin, Stra- 
vinsky, Ornstein, and Prokofieff? The Neo- 



ANARCHS AND ECSTASY 

Scythians, who, like their savage forebears, 
throw across their saddle-bow the helpless dia- 
tonic and chromatic scales and bear away their 
prisoners to their ultimate goal; the unknown 
land of the sinister duodecuple scale ! Ah ! we 
did not heed years ago the wise words of our 
critical Nestor, H. E. Krehbiel, when he said, 
"'Ware the Muscovite!" (He denies having 
used this precise phrase. Too late. We have 
pinned it to paper and it will go marching down 
the corridor of destiny wearing his label.) Ecce 
Cossakus ! Bad Latin, but reality. The Tar- 
tars are coming. Anarchs all. 

And ecstasy ! It is not an eminently modern 
quality in the Seven Arts. Sculpture did for a 
time resist the universal disintegration, this im- 
broglio of all the arts. Before Rodin no sculptor 
had so greatly dared to break the line, had 
dared to shiver the syntax of stone. Sculpture 
is a static, not a dynamic, art; therefore, let us 
observe the rules, preserve the chill spirit of the 
cemetery ! What Mallarme attempted in poetry 
Rodin accomplished in clay. His marbles do 
not represent, but present emotion, are the evo- 
cation of emotion; as in music, form and sub- 
stance coalesce. If he does not, as did Mallarme, 
arouse "the silent thunder afloat in the leaves/' 
he summons from the vasty deep the spirits of 
beauty, love, hate, pain, joy, sin, ecstasy, above 
all, ecstasy. The primal and danger-breeding 
gift of ecstasy is bestowed upon few. Keats had 
it, and Shelley; despite his passion, Byron missed 
77 



BEDOUINS 

it, as did the austere Wordsworth who had, per- 
haps, loftier compensations. Swinburne had it 
from the first. Not Tennyson, and Browning 
only in occasional exaltation. Like the "cold 
devils" of Felicien Rops, coiled in frozen ecstasy, 
the winds of hell booming about them, the po- 
etry of Charles Baudelaire is ecstatic. Poe and 
Heine knew ecstasy, and Liszt too; but Wagner, 
ill-tempered like all martyrs, was the master 
adept of his century. Tchaikovsky closely fol- 
lows him, and in the tiny piano pieces of Chopin 
ecstasy is pinioned in a few bars, the soul rapt 
to heaven in a phrase. Richard Strauss has 
shown us a variation on the theme: voluptuous- 
ness troubled by pain, the soul tortured by the 
very ecstasy of ecstasy. Like Yeats, he is 
"Master of the Still Stars and of the Flaming 
Door." William Blake and his figures rushing 
down the secret pathway of the mystic, which 
zigzags from the Fourth Dimension to the bot- 
tomless pit of materialism, was a creator of the 
darker nuances of pain and ecstasy. A sadistic 
strain in all this. 

Scriabin is of this tormented choir; as Arthur 
B. Davies, our own mystic, primitive painter. 
And Charles Martin Loeffler. It may be the 
decadence, as any art is in decadence which 
stakes the parts against the whole. That ec- 
stasy may be aroused by pictures of love and 
death, as in the cases of Poe and Baudelaire, 
Wagner and Strauss, should not, therefore, be 
78 



ANARCHS AND ECSTASY 

adjudged morbid. In the Far East they hyp- 
notize neophytes with a bit of broken mirror, 
for in the kingdom of art, as in heaven, there 
are many mansions. It was possibly a relic of 
his early admiration for the Baudelaire poems 
that set Wagner to extorting ecstasy from his 
orchestra by images of love and death, though 
doubtless the temperament which seeks assuage- 
ment in such a comminglement a temperament 
more often encountered in mediaeval art than 
now was natural to Wagner. He makes his 
Isolde sing madly and mournfully over a corpse, 
and, throwing herself upon the dead Tristan, 
she dissolves into the ecstasies of sweet, cruel 
love; in Salome, Richard Strauss closely pat- 
terns after Wagner; there is the head of a dead 
man though on a charger and there follows a 
poignant ecstasy not to be found in all music. 
Both men play with similar counters: love and 
death, and death and love. In Pisa may be 
seen (attributed by Vasari) Orcagna's fresco, 
The Triumph of Death. It has been set to 
grotesque music by Liszt in his Dance of 
Death. Let us not forget the great Italian, 
Gabriele d'Annunzio, whose magnificent prose, 
from The Triumph of Death to Forse Che Si, 
Forse Che No, is a paean to the tutelar gods of 
humanity, love and death. The sting of the 
flesh and the way of all flesh are intermingled 
in Rodin's astounding fugue, The Gate of Hell. 
First things and Last things, love and life, bit- 
79 



BEDOUINS 

terness and death, have ever ruled the arts; and 
all great art is anarchic, cosmos and chaos cun- 
ningly proportioned. 

But between the sublime and the silly there 
is only a hair's breadth. If not guided by tact 
and vision, the ecstatic in art and literature 
may degenerate into the erotic, and from the 
erotic to the tommyrotic is only a step. All this 
tumultuous imagery, this rhapsody Huneker- 
esque, is prompted by a photograph of Mary 
Garden, whose enigmatic eyes collide with my 
gaze across the Time and Space of my writing- 
desk. Your memory is wooed by the golden 
trumpets of Byzance, and when Mary speaks 
she wears the sacred Zaimph of Salammbo. 
Voltaire, in Candide, was wise when he advised 
us: "II faut cultiver notre Jardin." 



80 



IX 
PAINTED MUSIC 

PAINTED music. The common identity of the 
Seven Arts was a master theory of Richard Wag- 
ner and a theory he endeavored his life long to 
put into practice. Walter Pater, in his essay 
on The School of Giorgione, has dwelt upon 
the same theme, declaring music the archetype 
of the arts. In his Essays Speculative, John 
Addington Symonds has said some pertinent 
things on the subject. Camille Mauclair, in 
Idees Vivantes, seriously proposed a scheme for 
the fusion of the arts. The fusion would be cere- 
bral, as the actual mingling of sculpture, archi- 
tecture, music, drama, acting, painting, and 
dancing could never evoke the sensation of 
unity. Not thus is synthesis to be attained. 
It must be the "idea" of the arts rather than 
their material blending. A pretty chimera! 
Yet one that has piqued the attention of artists 
for centuries. It was the half-crazy E. T. W. 
Hoffmann, composer, dramatist, painter, poet, 
stage manager, and a dozen other professions, 
including those of genius and drunkard, who 
set off a train of fireworks that dazzled the brains 
of Poe, Baudelaire, and the later symbolists. 
81 



BEDOUINS 

Persons who hear painting, see music, touch 
poems, taste symphonies, and write perfumes 
are now classed by the psychical police as deca- 
dent, though such notions are as old as art and 
literature. In his L'Audition Coloree, Suarez 
de Mendoza has said that the sensation of color- 
hearing, the faculty of associating tones and 
colors, is often a consequence of an association 
of ideas established in youth. The colored 
vowels of Arthur Rimbaud, which should be 
taken as a poet's crazy prank; the elaborate 
treatises by Rene Ghil, which are terribly ear- 
nest; the casual remarks that one hears, such as 
"scarlet is like a trumpet blast" it was scarlet 
to the young Mozart; certain pages of Huysmans 
and Mallarme, all furnish examples of the curi- 
ous muddling of the five senses and the mixing 
of artistic genres. Naturally, this confusion has 
invaded criticism, which, limited in imagery, 
sometimes seeks to transpose the technical terms 
of one art to another. 

Whistler, with his Nocturnes, Color-Notes, 
Symphonies in Rose and Silver, his Color- 
Sonatas, boldly annexed well-worn musical 
phrases that, in their new estate, took on fresher 
meanings, while remaining knee-deep in the 
swamp of the nebulous. Modern composers 
have retaliated. Musical Impressionism is en- 
joying its vogue and the New Poetry is desper- 
ately pictorial. Soul-landscapes and etched 
sonnets are titles not unpleasing to the ear. 
What if they do not mean much ! There was a 
82 



PAINTED MUSIC 

time when to say "she had a sweet voice" 
aroused a smile. What has sugar to do with 
sound? It may be erratic symbolism, this 
melange of terminologies, yet, occasionally, it 
strikes sparks. There is a deeply rooted feeling 
that the arts have a common matrix, that, emo- 
tionally, they are akin. "Her slow smile" in 
fiction has had marked success, but when I 
wrote of the "slow Holland landscape," the 
phrase was suspiciously regarded. (I proba- 
bly found it in Verlaine or Rodin.) The 
bravest critic of the arts was Huysmans, who 
pitched pell-mell into the hell-broth of his 
critiques any image that assaulted his fecund 
brain. He forces us to see his picture; for he 
was primarily concerned with the eye, not the 
ear. Flaubert represents in its highest estate a 
fusion of sound and sense and seeing; he was 
both an auditive and a visualist. His prose 
sings, while its imagery sharply impinges upon 
the optic nerve. Nor are taste and smell neg- 
lected recall the very flavor of arsenic that 
killed Emma Bo vary or the scents of the wood- 
land where that adorable girl lingered with her 
lover. Joined to those evocations of the five 
senses there is a classic balance of sentence, 
phrase, paragraph, page; the syntactic architec- 
ture is magnificent, though not excelling the elo- 
quent Bossuet or the pictorial Chateaubriand as 
to complex, harmonious structure. These three 
great French writers had polyphonic minds, and 
their books and the orations of the superb Bos- 

83 



BEDOUINS 

suet englobe a world of ideas and sensations, 
music and painting. 

And Botticelli? Was Botticelli a "compre- 
hensive," as those with the sixth, or synthetic, 
sense have been named by Lombroso-Levi ? 
Beginning as a goldsmith's apprentice (Botti- 
cello, the little bottle), Botticelli as a painter 
became the most original in all Italy. His can- 
vases possess powers of evocation. He was a 
visionary, this Sandro Filipepi, pupil of the mer- 
curial Fra Lippo Lippi and of the Brothers 
Poliajuolo, and his vision must have been some- 
thing more than paint and pattern. A palimp- 
sest may be discerned by the imaginative 
rather let us say fanciful, since Coleridge set 
forth the categories whose secrets are not to 
be easily deciphered, and are something more 
than those portrayed on the flat surfaces of his 
pictures. Like most artists of his period he 
painted the usual number of Madonnas; never- 
theless, he did not convince his world, or suc- 
ceeding generations, that his piety was ortho- 
dox. During his lifetime suspected of strange 
heresies, this annotator and illustrator of Dante, 
this disciple of Savonarola, is now definitely 
ranged as a spirit saturated with paganism, and 
yet a mystic. Does not the perverse clash in 
such a temperament produce exotic dissonances ? 

All Florence was a sounding-board of the arts 

when Botticelli paced its narrow streets and 

lived its splendid colored life. His sensitive 

nature absorbed, as does a sponge water, the 

84 



PAINTED MUSIC 

impulses and motives of his contemporaries. 
The secrets lurking in the "new learning" 
doctrines that made for damnation, such as the 
recrudescence of the mediaeval conception of an 
angelic neuter host, neither for heaven nor hell, 
not on the side of Lucifer, nor yet with the 
starry hosts were said to have been mirrored 
in his pictures. Its note is in Citta di Vita, in 
the heresies of the Albigenses, and it may well 
go back to Origen. Those who could read his 
paintings and there were clairvoyant theolo- 
gians abroad in Florence might make of them 
what they would. Painted music is less under- 
standable than painted heresy. Matteo Pal- 
mieri is reported to have dragged Botticelli into 
dark corners of disbelief; there was in the Medi- 
cean days a cruel order of intelligence that de- 
lighted to toy with the vital faith and ideals of 
the young. A nature like Botticelli's, which 
frankly surrendered to new ideas if they but 
wore the mask of subtlety, was swept, no doubt, 
away in the eddying cross currents of Florentine 
intellectual movements. Mere instinct never 
moved him from his moral anchorage, for he 
was a sexless sort of man. Always the vision. 
He did not palter with the voluptuous frivolities 
of his fellow artists, yet his canvases are fever- 
ishly disquieting. The sting of the flesh is 
remote. Love is transfigured, though not spiri- 
tually, and not served to us as a barren parable, 
but made more intense by the breaking down of 
the thin partition between the sexes; a consuming 
85 



BEDOUINS 

emotion, not quite of this world nor of the next. 
However, the rebellion that stirred in the bosom 
of Botticelli never took on concrete aspects. 
His religious subjects are Hellenized, not after 
the sterner, more inflexible method of Mantegna, 
but resembling those of a philosophic Athenian 
who has read and comprehended Dante. His 
illustrations show us a different Dante, one who 
might not have altogether pleased that gloomy 
exile. The transpositions of the Divine Comedy 
by William Blake seem to sound the depths; 
Botticelli, notwithstanding the grace of his 
"baby Centaurs" and the wreathed car of Bea- 
trice, is the profounder man of the pair. 

His life, veiled toward the last, was not happy, 
although he was recognized as a great painter. 
Watteau concealed a cankering secret; so Botti- 
celli. Melancholy is the base of the Florentine's 
work. As a young man he created in joy and 
freedom; but the wings of Diirer's Bat were out- 
stretched over his brooding head. Melencolia ! 
He could ask if there is anything sadder under 
the sun than a soul incapable of sadness. There 
is more poignant music in his Primavera, in the 
weary, indifferent countenances of his lean, 
neuropathic Madonnas Pater calls them " pee- 
vish " in his Venus at the Uffizi, than in the 
paintings of any other Renaissance artist. The 
veils are there, the consoling veils of an exquisite 
art, which are missing in the lacerated and realis- 
tic holy folk of the Flemish Primitives. Joyful- 
86 



PAINTED MUSIC 

ness cannot be denied Botticelli; but it is not 
the golden joy of Giorgione; "Big George of 
Castelfranco." An emaciated music emanates 
from the eyes of that sad, restless Venus, to 
whom love has become a scourge of sense and 
spirit. Music? Yes, there is the "colored- 
hearing" of Mendoza. The canvases of Bot- 
ticelli sound the opalescent overtones of an 
unearthly composition. Is this Spring, this 
tender, tremulous virgin, whose right hand, 
deprecatingly raised, signals as a conductor from 
invisible orchestra its rhythms? Hermes, su- 
premely impassive, hand on thigh, plucks the 
fruit as the eternal trio of maidens with woven 
paces tread the measures of a dance we but 
overhear. Garlanded in blossoms, a glorious 
girl keeps time with the pulsing atmospheric 
moods; her gesture, surely a divine one, shows 
her casting flowers upon the richly embroidered 
floor of the earth. The light niters through the 
thick trees, its rifts as rigid as a candle. The 
nymph in the brake is threatening. Another 
epicene creature flies by her. Love shoots his 
bolt in mid-air. Is it from Paphos or Mitylene ? 
What the fable? Music plucked down from 
vibrating skies, music made visible. A mere 
masque, laden with the prim, sweet allegories of 
the day, it is not. That blunt soul, Vasari, saw 
at best its surfaces. The poet Politian got 
closer to the core. Centuries later our percep- 
tions sharpened by the stations traversed of sor- 
87 



BEDOUINS 

row and experience, lend to this immortal canvas 
a m'ore sympathetic, less literal interpretation. 

There is music, too, in the Anadyomene of 
the Uffizi. Still stranger music. Those sudden 
little waves that lap an immemorial strand; 
that shimmering shell, its fan-spokes converging 
to the parted feet of the goddess; her hieratic 
pose, its modesty symbolic, the hair that ser- 
pentines about her foam-born face, thin shoulders 
that slope into delicious arms; the Japanese 
group blowing tiny gem-like buds with their 
puffed-out cheeks; the rhythmic female on tip- 
toe offering her mantle to Venus; and enveloping 
all are vernal breezes, the wind that weeps in 
little corners, unseen, yet sensed, on every inch 
of the picture what are these mundane things 
but the music of an art, original at its birth, and 
since never reborn ? The larger, simpler, curved 
rhythms of the greater men, Michelangelo, Da 
Vinci, Shakespeare, Beethoven, are not in Botti- 
celli. Nevertheless, his voice is irresistible. 

Modern as is his spirit, as modern as Watteau, 
Chopin, or Shelley, he is no less ethereal; ethe- 
real and also realistic. We can trace his artistic 
ancestry; but what he became no man could 
have predicted. Technically, as one critic has 
written, "he was the first to understand the 
charm of silhouettes, the first to linger in ex- 
pressing the joining of the arm and body, the 
flexibility of the hips, the roundness of the 
shoulder, the elegance of the leg, the little 
88 



PAINTED MUSIC 

shadow that marks the springing of the neck, 
and, above all, the carving of the hand; but 
even more, he understood "le prestige insolent 
des grands yeux." 

Pater found his color cold and cadaverous, 
"and yet the more you come to understand 
what imaginative coloring really is, that all 
color is no mere delightful quality of natural 
things, but a spirit upon them by which they 
become expressive to the spirit, the better you 
like this peculiar quality of color." Bernard 
Berenson goes further. To him the entire can- 
vas, Venus Rising from the Sea, presents us 
with the quintessence of all that is pleasurable 
to our imagination of touch and movement. . . . 
The vivid appeal to our tactile sense, the life- 
communicating motion is always there. And 
writing of the Pallas in the Pitti galleries, he 
most eloquently declares: "As to the hair 
imagine shapes having the supreme life of line 
you may see in the contours of licking flames, 
and yet possessed of all the plasticity of some- 
thing which caresses the hand that models it to 
its own desire!" And, after speaking of Botti- 
celli's stimulating line, he continues: "Imagine 
an art made up entirely of these quintessences 
of movement-values and you will have some- 
thing that holds the same relation to represen- 
tation that music holds to speech and this art 
exists and is called lineal decoration. In this 
art of arts Sandro Botticelli may have had 
89 



'BEDOUINS 

rivals in Japan and elsewhere in the East, but 
in Europe never ! . . . He is the greatest mas- 
ter of lineal design that Europe ever had." 

Again, painted music; not the sounding sym- 
bolism of the emotions, but the abstract music 
of design. Nevertheless, the appeal of Botti- 
celli is auditive. Other painters have spun 
more intricate, more beautiful webs; have made 
more sensuous color-music; but the subtle sara- 
bands of Botticelli they have not composed. 
Here is a problem for the psychiatrist. In 
paint, manifestations of this order could be set 
down to mental lesion; that is how Maurice 
Spronck classifies the sensation. He studied it 
in the writings of the Goncourts and Flaubert. 
The giant of Croisset told the Goncourts that 
to him Salammbo was purple and L'Education 
Sentimentale grey, Carthage and Paris. A char- 
acteristic fancy. But why is it that scientific 
gentlemen, who predicate genius as eye-strain, 
do not reprove poets for their sensibility to the 
sound of words, to the shape and cadence of the 
phrase? It would appear that only prose-men 
are the culpable ones if they overhear the harp- 
ing of invisible harps from Ibsen's Steeplejacks, 
or describe the color of the thoughts of Zara- 
thustra. In reality, not one but thousands of 
people listen in the chill galleries of Florence to 
the sweet, nervous music of Botticelli. This 
testimony of the years is for the dissenters to 
explain. "Fantastico, Stravagante," as Vasari 
nicknamed Botticelli, has literally created an 
90 



PAINTED MUSIC 

audience which learned to use its eyes as he did, 
fantastically and extravagantly. 

He passed through the three stages dear to 
arbitrary criticism. Serene in his youthful 
years; troubled, voluptuous, and visionary dur- 
ing the Medicean period; sombre, mystic, a 
convert to Savonarola at the end. He traversed 
a great crisis not untouched. Certain political 
assassinations and the Pazzi conspiracy hurt 
him to the quick. He noted the turbulence of 
Rome and Florence, saw behind the gayly tinted 
arras of the Renaissance the sinister figures 
of supermen and criminals. He never married. 
When Tommaso Soderini begged him to take a 
wife he responded: "The other night I dreamed 
I was married. I awoke in such horror and 
chagrin that I could not fall asleep again. I 
arose and wandered about Florence like one 
possessed." Evidently not intended by nature 
to be husband or father. Like Watteau, like 
Baudelaire, like Nietzsche, grand visionaries 
abiding on the thither side of the facile joys 
of life, Botticelli was not tempted by the 
usual baits of happiness. His great Calumnia, 
in the Uffizi, might be construed as an image 
of the soul of Botticelli. Truth, naked and 
scorned we see again the matchless silhouette 
of his Venus misunderstood and calumniated, 
stands in the hall of a vast palace. She points 
to the heavens. She is a living interrogation- 
mark. Pilate's question ? Botticelli was adored. 
But understood? An enigmatic malady rav- 



BEDOUINS 

aged his innermost being. He died poor, soli- 
tary, did this composer of luminous chants and 
pagan poems, this moulder of exotic dreams, and 
of angels who long for gods other than those of 
Good and Evil. You think of the mystic Joa- 
chim of Flora and his Third Kingdom; the 
Kingdom of the Holy Spirit which is to follow 
the Kingdom of the Father and the Kingdom of 
the Son; the same Joachim who declared that 
the true ascetic counts nothing of his own, save 
only his harp. "Qui vere monachus est nihil 
reputat esse suum nisi citharam." And you 
also recall St. Anselm, who said that he would 
rather go to hell sinless than be in heaven 
smudged by a single transgression. 

A grievously wounded, timid soul, an intruder 
at the portals of Paradise, Botticelli had not 
the courage either to enter or withdraw. He 
experienced visions that rapt him into the ninth 
heaven, but when he reported them in the lan- 
guage of his design his harassed, divided spirit 
chilled the ardors of his art. In sooth, a spiri- 
tual dichotomy. And thus it is that the multi- 
tude does not worship at his shrine as at the 
shrine of Raphael. Do they unconsciously note 
the adumbration of a paganism long dead, but 
revived for a brief Botticellian hour? Venus or 
Madonna! Adonais or Christ! Under which 
god? The artist never frankly tells us. Leg- 
ends are revived of fauns turned monks, of the 
gods in exile and at servile labor in a world that 
has forgotten them, but with a sublimated 
92 



PAINTED MUSIC 

ecstasy not Heine's. When we stand before 
Botticelli and hear the pallid, muted music of 
his canvases we are certain that the last word 
concerning him shall not be uttered until his 
last line has vanished; even then his archaic 
harmonies may reverberate in the ears of man- 
kind. But always music painted. 



93 



POE AND HIS POLISH CONTEM- 
PORARY 

IN the City of Boston, January 19, 1809, a 
son was born to David and Elizabeth Poe. On 
March i, 1809, in the village of Zelazowa-Wola, 
twenty-eight English miles from Warsaw, in 
Poland, a son was born to Nicholas and Justina 
Chopin (Chopena or Szop). The American is 
known to the world as Edgar Allan Poe, the 
poet; the Pole as Frederic Francois Chopin, the 
composer. On October 7, 1849, Edgar Poe died, 
poor and neglected, in Washington Hospital at 
Baltimore, and on October 17, 1849, Frederic 
Chopin expired at Paris surrounded by loving 
friends, among whom were titled ladies. Tur- 
genev has said there were at least one hundred 
princesses and countesses in whose arms the 
most wonderful among modern composers 
yielded up his soul. Poe and Chopin were con- 
temporaries, and, curious coincidence, two su- 
premely melancholy artists of the Beautiful 
lived and died almost synchronously. 

My most enduring artistic passions are for 

the music of Chopin and the prose of Flaubert. 

In company with the cool, clear magic of a Jan 

Vermeer canvas, that of the Pole and French- 

94 



POE'S POLISH CONTEMPORARY 

man grazes perfection. But as a lad Chopin 
quite flooded my emotional horizon. I had 
conceived a fantastic comparison between Poe 
and Chopin, and I confess I was slightly piqued 
when Ignace Jan Paderewski, not then Premier 
of Poland, assured me that Chopin was born 
in the year 1810, and not the year earlier. 
The date chiselled on Chopin's Paris tomb in 
Pere Lachaise a sad tribute to the mediocre 
art of Clesinger, who married Solange Sand is, 
after all, the correct one, and this new date, 
which is also the old, is inscribed on the Chopin 
Memorial at Warsaw, Poland. I shall not at- 
tempt to dispute the claim; even the most pains- 
taking of Chopin biographers, Prof. Frederick 
Niecks, admits his error. The latest biog- 
raphy, said to be definitive, by the Polish mu- 
sicograph, Ferdinand Hoesick, I have not seen; 
the war impeded the translation. Yet I am 
fain to believe that too many parish registers 
were in existence, and perhaps the next one that 
is unearthed may give as new dates either 1808 
or 1811. I prefer 1809, while apologizing for 
my obstinacy. Unhappily for future investi- 
gators, Russian Cossacks in 1915 ravaged with 
torch and sword the birthplace, not only de- 
stroying the Chopin monument, but burning 
his house and the parish church. These once 
highly esteemed vandals, pogrom heroes, and 
butchers of thousands of helpless Jewish women, 
children, and old men, only repeated at Zela- 
zowa-Wola the actions of their forebears at War- 

95 



BEDOUINS 

saw during the sanguinary uprising of 1831. 
The correspondence of Chopin, treasured by his 
sister, Louise Jedrzejewicza, and the piano of 
his youth were completely destroyed. (Louise 
died in 1855, and the other sister, Isabella Bar- 
cinska, in 1881.) 

The love of Poe began early with me. My 
father had been a friend of the poet's in Phila- 
delphia, and a member of the Poe circle during 
the forties of the last century; " roaring forties, 
indeed. That prime old comedian, Billy Burton, 
the ideal Falstaff of his day; John Sartain, the 
engraver, and father of William Sartain, the 
painter; Judge Conrad, who could move his 
listeners to tears when he recited the Lord's 
Prayer; the elder Booth, a noble tragedian much 
given to drink; Graham, the publisher, and sev- 
eral others whose names have escaped my mem- 
ory, composed this interesting group. In his 
memoirs John Sartain has written of Poe and 
of a certain wild midnight walk in Fairmount 
Park. I remember the elder Sartain as an in- 
frequent visitor at our house, and I also remem- 
ber how I hung on his words when he spoke of 
Poe. My father told me that Poe would be- 
come a raving maniac after a thimbleful of 
brandy, so sensitive was his cerebral mecha- 
nism. But other authorities contradict this 
theory. Poe had been often seen to toss off 
a tumblerful of cognac neat. Last year at 
Atlantic City I met Mr. Hutzler, a well-known 
merchant of Baltimore, a spry young octo- 



POE'S POLISH CONTEMPORARY 

genarian and a seasoned raconteur. He told 
me, and in a vivid manner, of seeing Edgar 
Poe and Junius Brutus Booth hanging on to 
the same lamp-post, both helplessly drunk at 
midday. This happened about 1845, as the boys, 
Mr. Hutzler among the rest, trooped out to 
dinner from the public school on Holiday Street. 
Mr. Hutzler's memory has a mirror-like clear- 
ness, and he described the occurrence as if it 
had happened yesterday. Like irreverent school- 
boys, they surrounded the greatest living Shake- 
spearean actor and the greatest American poet 
and mocked at them. 

We lived on North Seventh Street, and twice 
a day, on my trip to and from school, I passed 
the house where Poe had lived during his sojourn 
in Philadelphia, from 1838 to 1844. That house 
I should not have been able to locate to-day if 
my friend, Christopher Morley (charming writer, 
with a name that recalls spacious Elizabethan 
times: Kit Morley !), hadn't described it. This 
house, in which Poe wrote The Raven and The 
Gold Bug, is at the northwest corner of Sev- 
enth and Brandywine Streets. Another critic 
friend, Albert Mordell, assures me that the old 
pear-tree in the back yard still bears fruit for 
the present resident, Mrs. Owens. The house 
is the rear building of another numbered 530 
North Seventh Street. Mr. Mordell sent me a 
photograph which shows a typical Philadelphia 
red brick structure with white shutters and 
marble steps. I have heard of many spots 
97 



BEDOUINS 

where Poe wrote The Raven, Fordham among 
the rest, but as boys we told ourselves when 
we stared at the old building: "Poe wrote his 
Raven and Gold Bug there !" It is something 
to remember in these piping times of hypocrisy 
and universal hatred of art, music, and litera- 
ture. 

It would be a strained parallel to compare 
Poe with Chopin at all points; nevertheless, 
chronological coincidences are not the only com- 
parisons that might be instituted without exag- 
geration. True, the roots of Chopin's culture 
were more cosmopolitan, more richly nurtured 
than Poe's; the poet, like an air-plant, found his 
spiritual sustenance from sources unknown to 
the America of his day. Of Poe's intellectual 
ancestry, however, we may form some concep- 
tion, though his learning was not profound, 
despite his copious quotations from half-forgot- 
ten and recondite authors, Glanvil, for example. 
Nevertheless, the matchless lines, "Helen, thy 
beauty is to me like those Nicean barks of yore," 
. . . were struck off in the fire of a boyhood 
passion. Chopin had a careful training under 
the eye of his Polish teacher, Eisner; but who 
could have taught him how to compose his 
Opus 2, the Variations on Mozart's La ci 
darem la mano? Both Poe and Chopin were 
full-fledged artists from the beginning, their in- 
dividualities and limitations sharply defined. 
Perhaps the most exquisite music penned by 
Poe is this same Helen, while the first mazourka 



POE'S POLISH CONTEMPORARY 

of Chopin stamps him as an original poet. In 
the later productions of these men there is more 
than a savor of morbidity. Consider the Fan- 
taisie-Polonaise, Opus 61, with its most musical, 
most melancholy cadences; or the F minor Ma- 
zourka, composed during the last illness of Cho- 
pin; a sick brain betrays itself in the rhythmic 
insistence of the theme, a soul-weary Where- 
fore? In the haunting repetitions and harmo- 
nies of Ulalume there is a poetic analogue. This 
poem, in which sense swoons into sound, pos- 
sesses a richness of color and rhythmic accent 
that betoken the mentality of a poet whose brain 
is perilously unhinged. If alcohol produced this 
condition, then might a grateful world erect 
altars to such a wondrous god of evocation. 
Prohibition has not thus far produced a Poe. 
But he wasn't the creation of either alcohol or 
drugs, though they were contributory causes; 
they prodded his cortical cells into abnormal 
activity, made leap the neuronic filaments with 
surprising consequences. No, a profound cere- 
bral lesion was the real reason why Poe resorted 
to brandy to soothe his exacerbated nerves, and 
not because he drank did he go to wrack and 
ruin. His "case" is like Baudelaire's and 
E. T. W. Hoffmann's; not to mention the names 
of James Clarence Mangan and Monticelli, one 
the singer of Dark Rosaleen, the other that 
master of gorgeous hues, fantasies of enchanted 
lands and crumbling linear designs. 
Poe, then, like Chopin, did not die too soon. 
99 



BEDOUINS 

Neurotic natures, they lived their lives with the 
intensity which Walter Pater has declared is the 
true existence. "To burn always with this 
hard, gem-like flame, to maintain this ecstasy, 
is success in life. Failure is to form habits. " 
Alas ! that way madness lies for the majority of 
mankind, notwithstanding the aesthetic exhor- 
tation of Pater. Poe and Chopin fulfilled the 
Pater conditions during their brief sojourn on 
our parent planet. They ever burned with the 
flame of genius, and that flame devoured them. 
They were not citizens of moral repute. Nor 
did they accumulate "mortal pelf." They 
failed to form habits, and while the psychic 
delicacy of Chopin proved a barrier against 
self-indulgence of the grosser sort, he contrived 
to outrage social and ethical canons even 
in tolerant Paris. The influence of George 
Sand, her ascendancy over his volition, worked 
evil and unhappiness. The delicate porcelain of 
his genius could not float down-stream in com- 
pany with her brassy ware without ensuing 
disaster for the finer of the twain. Alcoholic 
neurosis did not trouble him, but he was tuber- 
cular, and that malady is more fatal than alco- 
holism. Poe was not precisely a drunkard; 
probably masked epilepsy accounts for his va- 
garies; such victims are periodical dipsomaniacs, 
" circulates" is the term of the psychiatrists. 
His personality was winning, his speech electric, 
his eye alight with genius; but, then, the obverse 
of the medal ! A sad, slouching creature, with 
100 



POE'S POLISH CONTEMPORARY 

a cynic's sneer, a bitter tongue which lashed 
friend and foe alike, a gambler, a libertine 
what has this unhappy poet not been called? 
Baudelaire asked whether the critical hyenas 
could not have been prevented from defacing 
the tomb of Poe. (He used Rabelaisian lan- 
guage in the original French.) Charles Baude- 
laire, a spiritual double of Poe, was another un- 
happy wraith of genius, and of the same choir 
of self-lacerated and damned souls. 

Fancy Poe and Chopin in New York during 
the prosaic atmosphere of those days ! If Chopin 
had not achieved artistic success at the Soiree 
of Prince Radziwill in Paris, 1831, he would 
probably have gone to America, where he might 
have met Poe. He had declared his intention 
to leave Paris for New York, and his passport 
was vised "passing through." Poe and Chopin 
conversing! The idea is rather disquieting. 
Stendhal, not hoodwinked by Chateaubriand, 
with his purple phrases and poetic visions of 
virgin forests and sweet Indian girls in an im- 
possible Louisiana, declared that America was 
materialistic beyond hope of redemption. Tal- 
leyrand knew better. However, it was bet- 
ter for the artistic development of the Po- 
lish composer that he remained in the Old 
World. Think of Chopin giving piano les- 
sons to the daughters of the New-Rich at 
the fashionable Battery, and Poe encountering 
him at some conversazione they had conver- 
saziones then and propounding to him Heine- 
101 



BEDOUINS 

like questions: Are the roses at home still in 
their flame-hued pride? Do the trees sing as 
beautifully as ever in the moonlight ? Are hum- 
ming-birds and star-dust Francesca Astra 
still as rare as ambergris ? At a glance Poe and 
Chopin would have sympathized. In sensibility 
the American was not inferior to the Pole. Poe 
would have felt the "drummed tears" in the 
playing of Chopin, and in turn Chopin would 
not have failed to divine the vibrations of Poe's 
high-strung nature. Both men were mystics, 
were seers. What a meeting that would have 
been; yet inevitable misery might have come to 
the Pole in unsympathetic New York. A dif- 
ferent tale if Poe had gone to Paris and enjoyed 
a meed of artistic success. Baudelaire, who 
was born in April, 1821, therefore a young chap 
in 1845, would have known him and, congenial 
souls, they would surely have gone to the devil 
quicker than apart. Baudelaire and Poe! 
There's a marvellous combination for you of 
fantasy, moonlight, rotten nerves, hasheesh, and 
alcohol! The fine flower of the genius of Poe 
might have bloomed more fragrantly on French 
soil; perhaps with the added note of depravity 
not in his sexless creations, and so corroding a 
note in Les Fleurs du Mai. Who may dare say ! 
But then we might not have had the sinister 
melancholia, so sweetly despairing, so despair- 
ingly sweet, that we enjoy in the real Poe. 

The culture of Chopin was not of a finer stamp 
than Poe's, nor was his range so wide. In their 
102 



POE'S POLISH CONTEMPORARY 

intellectual sympathies both were rather narrow, 
though intense to an emotional poignancy, and 
both were remarkable in mood- versatility. B orn 
aristocrats, purple raiment became them well. 
Both were sadly deficient in planturous humor 
and the Attic salt that conserves the self-mock- 
ery of Heine. Irony they possessed to a super- 
lative degree. Both created rhythmic beauty, 
evoked the charm of evanescence. A crepuscu- 
lar art; the notations of twilit souls and the 
" October of the sensations." Both were at 
their best in smaller artistic forms. When either 
one spreads his pinions for symphonic flight we 
think of Matthew Arnold's interpretation of 
Shelley: "beating in the void his luminous wings 
in vain." Which phrase truly is of Mat's own 
making, yet somehow misses the essential Shel- 
ley. Poe and Chopin supremely mastered their 
intellectual instruments. Artificers in precious 
cameos, they are of an artistic consanguinity 
because of their extraordinary absorption in the 
Beautiful. Poe wrote in English, but was he 
really as American as Hawthorne and Emerson 
were American? His verse and prose depict 
characters and landscapes that belong to No 
Man's Land, in that mystic region east of the 
sun, west of the moon. The American scene 
was unsympathetic to him, and he refused 
to become even morally acclimated. His El- 
dorado is "over the mountains of the moon, 
down the valley of the shadow." His crea- 
tions are bodiless; shadow of shadows, the 



BEDOUINS 

incarnation of Silence, set forth in spectral 
speech. Unlike any other native-born writer, 
he sounds better in a French garb; the Baude- 
laire translations improve his style, and Stephane 
Mallarme has accomplished an almost miracu- 
lous transposition of Ulalume. (The Raven 
Le Corbeau by the same master I do not care 
for as much, and with its refrain, " Jamais plus ! " 
is not so musically sonorous as "Nevermore!") 
Henry Beyle-Stendhal wrote in his witty, 
malicious manner that "Romanticism is the art 
of presenting to the people literary works which 
in the actual state of their habitudes and beliefs 
are capable of giving the greatest possible plea- 
sure; Classicism, on the contrary, is the art of 
presenting literature which gave the greatest 
possible pleasure to their great-grandfathers." 
Stendhal is half right. A Classic is sometimes 
a dead Romantic. But Poe and Chopin remain 
invincibly Romantic, yet are Classics. Chopin 
is more human than Poe, inasmuch as he is 
patriotic. His polonaises are "cannons buried 
in flowers," his psychic bravery overflows in the 
Revolutionary Etude. He is Chopin. And he 
is also Poland. Like the national poet, Adam 
Mickiewicz, he struck many human chords, 
though some of his melodies could dwell in Poe's 
"misty mid-region of Weir," where Beauty 
boasts an icy reign. There is a disturbing 
dissonance in the Poe-Chopin case: Poe was a 
man without a country; Chopin had the price- 
less possession of Poland. On his heart was 
104 



POE'S POLISH CONTEMPORARY 

engraved "Poland." The love of Frederic 
Chopin for his native land dowered him with a 
profounder nature than the Lucifer of Amer- 
ican poetry, Edgar Allan Poe. But what en- 
igmatic, beautiful souls ! 



105 



XI 
GEORGE LUKS 

OF course, I knew in a vague way where 
Edgecombe Road and Jumel Place spotted the 
map, for I am a seasoned Manhattan cockney. 
But, after all, I mixed up the Jumel Mansion 
and the house of George Luks, and so I asked 
that painter for some travel indications. He 
sent me a map that was clarity itself. All I 
had to do was to sit in the Broadway subway 
till I reached One Hundred and Sixty-eighth 
Street; then take the elevator as deep down in 
the bowels of the earth as if in the London Un- 
derground; on reaching the sidewalk proceed 
northward to One Hundred and Seventieth 
Street the little arrows on the chart are marked ; 
then eastward (another arrow) and behold ! Am- 
sterdam Avenue. There you enter a delicates- 
sen bureau and tactfully inquire after Edge- 
combe Road. 

I did all these things, and was recently told 
on a fine, breezy afternoon by a foreign youth 
that the road was in front of my face, as was 
Highbridge Park; around the corner was Jumel 
Place. Enfin! I said to the polite guide, and 
nosed my way till I saw an ideal cottage 
though rather large for a cottage with a big 
1 06 



GEORGE LUKS 

studio window facing the north. Recalling 
what Luks had often said "To hades with a 
north light; a man ought to be able to paint in 
a cellar!" I wondered. Then I traversed a 
garden and broke into the house, a burglar, 
armed with a pen and a bagful of question- 
marks. It was the home of the only George 
Luks, who, happy boy, has a painting tempera- 
ment with an "angel in the house" to protect 
him from the contact of a world of cruel critics, 
and is also the possessor of the disposition de- 
scribed as "bubbling." His favorite exclama- 
tion is: "Yours for happiness." He means it. 
It is the leading-motive of his life. 

Here are domestic comfort, a north light, and 
plenty of models across the road in the open 
air, splashed by sunshine or shadowed by trees; 
babies, goats, nurse-girls, park loafers, police- 
men, lazy pedestrians, noisy boys, nice little 
girls with hoops, and the inevitable sparrows. 
Rocks are in abundance. The landscape "com- 
poses" itself. And you are not surprised, when 
ushered into the great studio on the second 
floor, to be confronted by canvases registering 
various phases of the vibrating world hard-by. 
Since he moved from down-town the painter is 
becoming more of a plein-airiste. 

Luks doesn't wander afar for subjects. He 
still loves the familiar, the homely, the simple. 
It had been several years since I saw his work. 
Occasionally in Holland I would run across a 
canvas by Jan Steen, Adrien Brouwer, or even 
107 



BEDOUINS 

Hals, that recalled Luks. His artistic affinities 
are Dutch rather than French; above all, he is 
an American painter to his blunt finger-tips. 
Beginning in the field of illustration, he was 
plunged up to his eyes in New York life. I be- 
lieve it was Arthur Brisbane who first suggested 
to him that he should go in for painting in oils. 

He went to Diisseldorf and survived that try- 
ing experience a school that would submerge a 
Manet. Paris followed. But George is not a 
product of the schools. Theories sit lightly on 
his mercurial shoulders. He loathes "move- 
ments," and refers to the "new" men, cubists, 
lamp-post impressionists, and futurists in words 
that curdle the blood. Indeed, his vocabulary 
is as variegated and picturesque as his palette. 
As for the personality of the man well, it is 
absolutely impossible to set down on paper any 
adequate description of him. He is Puck. He 
is Caliban. He is Falstaff. He is a tornado. 
He is sentimental. He can sigh like a lover, 
and curse like a trooper. Sometimes you won- 
der over his versatility; a character actor, a low 
comedian, even song-and-dance man, a poet, a 
profound sympathizer with human misery, and 
a human orchestra. The vitality of him ! 

Perhaps the simile of a man-orchestra is the 
most fitting. Did you ever see and hear those 
curious creatures, less rare in our streets a 
quarter of a century ago than now? I remem- 
ber one in a small French city, a white-haired 
fellow who, with fife, cymbals, bells, concertinas 
108 



GEORGE LUKS 

he wore two strapped under either arm at 
times fiddles, made epileptic music as he quivered 
and danced, wriggled and shook his skull. The 
big drum was fastened to his back, upon its top 
were cymbals. On his head he wore a pavilion 
hung with bells that pealed when he twisted his 
long skinny neck. He carried a weather-worn 
violin with a string or two missing; while a pipe 
that might have been a clarinet years before 
emitted but cackling tones from his thin lips. 
By some incomprehensible co-ordination of mus- 
cular movements he contrived simultaneously 
to sound his armory of instruments; and the 
whistling, screeching, scratching, drumming, 
wheezing, and tinkling of metal were appalling. 
But it was rhythmic, and at intervals the edge 
of a tune might be discerned sharply cutting 
through the dense cloud of vibrations, like the 
prow of a boat cleaving a fog. And the rever- 
berating music swelled, multifarious and amaz- 
ing, as if a military band, from piccolo to drum, 
were about to descend upon the town. A clat- 
ter and bang, a sweet droning and shrill scrap- 
ing were heard, as the old chap alternately 
limped and danced in the middle of the roadway. 
Now, George Luks is not venerable; he is a 
comparatively young man, yet he reminds me 
of that human orchestra. It is an image of 
lithe activity that he suggests. What has this 
to do with his art? Much. It is rhythmic, 
many-colored, intensely alive, charged with 
character and saturated with humanity, not 
109 



BEDOUINS 

forgetting humor. Pathos is not absent. In 
his latest productions I noted with satisfaction 
more repose, deeper feeling, more solicitude for 
his surfaces, the modulation of tones; and the 
same old riotous joy in color for color's sake. 
Yes, in his themes he still belongs to the illus- 
trators. He seldom tells a definite story, but 
there is no mistaking his point of view. 

I saw portraits of girls in masquerade that 
were expressed in terms of beautiful paint. A 
little red-head, the sheer tonal charm immedi- 
ate, made me think of both Henner and Whistler. 
Then a Hals-like head, virile and sincere; a sen- 
sitively limned portrait of a young girl, his 
niece; a large canvas; charming girls under 
umbrageous trees, a veritable gamut of greens; 
an old woman who simply cried to be framed 
and exhibited how many things did I not stare 
at, wondering over the inexhaustible fecundity, 
and groaning over the reckless prodigality, of 
this gifted man ! With a tithe of his talent and 
personal quality other painters have achieved 
renown. However, he is not lacking in honors. 
He has plenty of admirers, plenty of commis- 
sions; yet do his friends wish that he would 
sometimes apply the brakes to that fiery tem- 
perament of his and steer his bark into less 
tumultuous waters. His art would gain thereby 
in finish, and distinction, and repose. And it 
might also die. 

I once called George Luks "a hand and an 
eye." His power of observation is great. He 
no 



GEORGE LUKS 

has the intensity of a Spaniard and the realism 
of a Dutchman. He is both exact and rebel- 
lious. Wherever he happens to pitch his tent 
becomes his studio; preferably in the open. But 
the East Side is his happy hunting-ground. In 
the Yiddish restaurants where old men with 
Biblical heads drink coffee and slowly converse; 
on Houston Street, when, apparently, the entire 
population is buying fish Shabbas- abend; in 
vile corners where the refuse of humanity drift, 
helpless, hopeless there Luks catches some 
gleam of humor or pathos, some touch that 
Gorky-like brings before us in a dozen strokes 
of the brush or pencil a human trait which 
emerges to the surface of this vast boiling ket- 
tle like a spar thrown up by an angry sea. All 
happiness is not lost in those mean streets; a 
rift of wintry sunlight, a stray tune from some 
wheezy barrel-organ, and two children waltz 
with an unconscious zest of life that will sur- 
vive until they are nonogenarians. Of such 
contrasts Luks is the master. 

His Spielers is like a quivering page from 
from whom ? The East Side is yet to boast its 
Dickens. And Dickens would have enjoyed 
the picture of the little tousled Irish girl, with 
her red locks, who dances with the pretty flaxen- 
haired German child, surely a baker's daughter 
from Avenue B. Now, you might suppose that 
this vivid art, this painting which has caught 
and retained the primal jolt and rhythm of the 
sketch, must be necessarily rude and unscientific 
in 



BEDOUINS 

in technique. It is the reverse. This particu- 
lar picture is full of delicious tonalities. The 
head of the blonde girl might be from an English 
eighteenth-century master, and the air it fills 
the spaces with a fluid caress. 

And his Little Gray Girl, a poor wisp of flesh 
wearing a grotesque shawl and hat, shivering in 
the chill of a gloomy evening, sounds touching 
music. The note of sentiment is not forced; 
indeed, the passages of paint first catch the 
eye, modulations of grays and blacks that tell 
of the artist's sensitive touch. He has wanton 
humors. He paints a French coachman, life- 
size, seated at a cafe table about to swill brandy. 
It is so real that you look another way. Or you 
are shown a collection of beggars who were 
famous a few years ago on Sixth Avenue, Broad- 
way, the east side, Fulton Market: Matches 
Mary, the Duchess, the tottering Musician, the 
old Italian, "Gooda nighta, Boss!" and a host 
of nocturnal creatures since dead or in the 
hospital, perhaps in jail. Luks is their inter- 
preter. Nor does he lean to the pessimistic; he 
is a believer in life and its characteristic beauty. 
The pretty he abhors. 

There is the Duchess. In life she was an 
elderly hag with a distinguished bearing, a 
depraved woman of rank, who wore five or six 
dresses at once, on her head a shapeless yet 
attractive gear, and in her pocket she carried 
a fat roll of bills fer purposes of dissipation, or 
bribery, or for bailing out some Tenderloin 
112 



GEORGE LUKS 

wreck. She is maleficence incarnate. Just 
fancy this bird of the night set forth by a sym- 
pathetic brush, endowed with a life that over- 
flows the canvas, and you see this grande dame 
strut by, the embodiment of evil, yet a duchess 
a la Sir Johsua, though a rebours. It is a sinister 
art which recalls the genius of Toulouse-Lautrec. 
With Lautrec the work of Luks has certain 
affinities. He may never have studied that 
painter; rather is it a temperamental resem- 
blance, a certain tolerant way of seeing men 
and things. But Luks is not so cynical as the 
Frenchman. 

And that striking embodiment of Whisky Bill, 
a once well-known personage in the American 
Parisian colony! Several judges have praised 
the Fraser portrait, which we greatly admire 
for its excellent qualities, but personally we 
plump for the head of Whisky Bill, the head of 
a great violinist and also a profound alcoholist. 
In Gorky's Nachtasyl there is an old actor 
who runs about the play exclaiming: "I have 
poisoned my organism with alcohol." We have 
never seen Whisky Bill, but we are sure from 
the canvas that he has poisoned his organism 
with alcohol. Nevertheless, a man who thinks, 
one who has suffered from the mirage of thirst, 
not one of the Hals or the Steen jovial drinkers. 
The spleen of life has killed the ideals of Bill. 
They are submerged in his melancholy eyes. 
As for his hair, we might almost compare it to 
Masson's engraving of the gray-haired man, 
"3 



BEDOUINS 

Guillaume de Brisacier, after Mignard; but with 
a difference the hair is treated more luminously 
in mass than detail. 

There are the usual number of studies from 
life, of Old Mary Curling Her Hair, a companion 
piece to the Goose Girl. The most characteris- 
tic picture in the Luks collection is an ideal 
head of Bobbie Burns's Suter Johnnie. Therein 
is the synthesis of all the more admirable quali- 
ties of Luks: humor, technical audacity, solid 
modelling, vital color, sweet sentiment, and a 
searching humanity, all of which combined make 
a vigorous appeal to the spectator. Luks 
sometimes plays to the gallery, but at the core 
he is sincere. His feet are set upon the moun- 
tain. He is not pausing to grasp at the flowers 
or the applause. But do not imagine because 
he is the smiling George Luks with the Napo- 
leonic brow, round cherubic cheeks, and nimble 
wit, that he is easy to decipher. 

As for The Pawnbroker's Daughter she 
might have stepped out from some old Holland 
master's studio. The Dutch strain in Luks 
and his shrewd Yankee humor are here blended 
in the happiest manner. The girl is carrying a 
carafe on a tray. The rich comminglement of 
tones, the tribal " awareness" of the girl's glance, 
her tangled hair, and the smouldering splendor 
of her garb are indicated without a suspicion of 
bravura; yet one is conscious of virtuosity, clair- 
voyance, and sympathetic observation. 

There is the reverse of the medal. No man 
114 



GEORGE LUKS 

is made all of a piece, and the art of Luks has 
its seamy side. He displays an infernal impa- 
tience, that chief sin of heresiarchs, according 
to Cardinal Newman. He sometimes takes 
criticism in no amiable way. And the corollary 
of impatience is haste in execution. Luks sel- 
dom finishes a canvas. He must have five hun- 
dred stowed away in his studio. Many are not 
half-begun. Nevertheless, this rough handling 
of his material neither irreverent nor careless 
bears special fruits. Some subjects respond 
instantly to this treatment. Swift, brutal, sel- 
dom subtle, though suggestive, his portraits leap 
from the bare canvas into vital being. In the 
fury of his execution, when the fit is upon him 
he could cover miles of walls with figures. This 
itching of the nerves, this tugging of the mus- 
cles, which impels a pianist to play until Jericho 
falls or his listeners die, is but the special artistic 
organ of any artist keyed up to the pitch of 
intensity. Luks is the most normal man imag- 
inable. Full of the kindly sap of life, he too 
often boasts his powers when he should be 
making lines and color patches. That is his 
very human side; " human all too human" 
as Nietzsche would say. Slightly inhuman is 
his capacity for sustained work mind you, we 
don't say sustained in the sense of sticking at 
one picture until he has exhausted its possibili- 
ties, but a capacity for toil, prolonged, laborious. 
This exuberance, this boiling over of energy, 
these dashes at reality, these slices of life, bold 



BEDOUINS 

portraits of men and women who dare to live, 
though only painted, this Human Comedy 
merely hinted at, are testimonies to the creative 
and tumultuous powers of a man who is of Rab- 
elaisian energies. The saving fact is that Luks 
is not old, and knows what he most lacks. To 
advise him to paint like some one else, to make 
slim silk purses when he so superbly paints 
sows' ears, would be futile. He is not academic. 
He has a grim vein of irony that spells at a 
glance the tragi-comedy of life his Parisian 
sketch-books would have attracted Daumier 
and also a superabounding confidence that some- 
tunes leads its owner into dubious, as well as 
devious, places. 

But he is one of our native, commanding tal- 
ents, and with study and experience must come 
the purging of the dross; with his mellowing 
Luks will take his proper place among his con- 
temporaries, and it will be in the seats of the 
mighty or nowhere. The only possible school- 
ing that will hasten this result will be the stern 
self-schooling of George Luks. But he is just 
the style of man who may bid criticism go hang 
and nevertheless win out at the end. Like the 
turbulent and fleshly Bard of Camden, he can 
"sound his barbaric yawp over the roofs of the 
world," and make of this "yawp" an art ex- 
tremely personal and arresting. 

As a portraitist he has his good days and bad. 
When he is deeply gripped by his subject he is 
usually successful. The head of Senator Root 
116 



GEORGE LUKS 

was criticised because of a certain hardness and 
rigidity in texture and pose, but there were 
critics who declared that the painter's psychol- 
ogy had revealed the essential Root austere, 
profound, Machiavellian statesman and scholar. 
The self-portrait, like the Smoker of Brouwer, 
is the record of a passing mood. It is a swift 
sketch, and is Luks in the heydey of a happy, 
devil-may-care humor. Truly a * human docu- 
ment/ I admire his landscape, Round Houses 
at High Bridge. The atmosphere is finely 
evoked; Luks knows his values. Steam, and 
again steam, is painted in a delicate scale of 
pearl-greys. 

But even Lux pinxit becomes a long-drawn-out 
line of light. I bade my hosts good day. "I'll 
see you as far as the subway," said Luks. He 
accompanied me to the station, where you go 
down to the train in a lofty elevator, as you do 
in the gloomy London Underground. I had 
passed an admirable afternoon with a human 
painter. Some painters are not human. 



1-17 



XII 
CONCERNING CALICO CATS 

THIS is to be a sober Sunday sermon, even 
though it largely concerns Calico Cats. What 
is a calico cat? you will ask. The first we ever 
heard of the strange beast, after the Eugene 
Field poem, was at a concert of the Philharmonic 
Society, when Mortimer Wilson conducted a 
clever orchestral suite in which figured the 
Funeral of the Calico Cat; that is, a specific cat, 
one, let it be said in passing, that was quite tiny 
at the beginning of the music, but grew to mon- 
strous proportions before its interment; a cat 
that would have put to blush the "Cheshire 
Puss" of Alice's in the fable. Cats in calico may 
be seen on the streets any Gotham summer day, 
but a calico cat what in the world may that 
be? The simulacrum of a feline, an eidolon, 
such as Mr. Howell once described? We can't 
ask Mr. Wilson, because he might refer us 
to his charming score, which speaks for itself. 
Verhaeren, the Belgian poet, the greatest living 
poet at the time of his death at Rouen, with the 
solitary exception of Gabriele d'Annunzio, Emile 
Verhaeren has written about "Cats of ebony, 
Cats of flame," but, manifestly, a cat can't be 
both flaming and calico. We must turn to that 
118 



CONCERNING CALICO CATS 

lover of cats, Charles Baudelaire, who wrote 
sonnets to his cats as others have penned praises 
of their mistresses' eyebrows. He discovered to 
France the genius of Richard Wagner and the 
genius of Edouard Manet, not to mention Poe's. 
Jules Clare tie relates that Baudelaire said to 
him, with a grimace: "I love Wagner; but the 
music I prefer is that of a cat hung by his tail 
outside of a window, and trying to stick to the 
panes of glass with its claws. There is an odd 
grating on the glass which I find at the same 
time strange, irritating, and singularly harmo- 
nious." 

Now, obviously, this is an invention. Per- 
verse as Baudelaire undoubtedly was, he loved 
cats too much to torture them. Without know- 
ing it, the late director of the Theatre Frangais 
has described, "avant la lettre," as the etchers 
say, the music of the future: Schoenberg, Stra- 
vinsky, Ornstein, and Prokofieff. But calico 
cats! Not a spoor of them in all this, so we 
are forced to fall back upon symbolism, which 
seems to be the art of saying the reverse of 
what you think. (I nearly meant this.) In 
his Hunting of the Snark Lewis Carroll finds 
that it is a Boojum. Perhaps our calico cat is 
not a cat at all, but a critic. But then a cat 
may look at a critic, as a critic is privileged to 
stare a composer out of countenance. A calico 
cat may, for all we know, house the soul of a 
real cat. Therefore, children, do not treat it 
rudely ! It may be watching you with its ma- 
119 



BEDOUINS 

lignant, beady eyes, ready to spring, ready to 
scratch when you least expect it! And we 
should not forget Baudelaire, who would lower 
his voice when showing his friends some Poly- 
nesian idol of wood, bidding them not mock, 
because once upon a time a deity may have in- 
habited the rude carving. The remote ancestor 
of a calico doll may have been that scourge of 
a vanished geological epoch, the sabre-toothed 
tiger, just as the iridescent dragon-fly that 
flashes winged sunshine as it skims is the pitiful 
reduction of the dread Pterodactyl, the flying 
saurian, which also reappears as the Jabberwock 
(furnished with a monocle by Sir John Tenniel, 
ever a stickler for etiquette). The calico cat 
might be a prowling version of the Frumious 
Bandersnatch, with the claws that scratch. 

But a truce to paleontology ! Let us of the 
nonce assume that the cat in question stands 
for the tutelar totem of criticism. A mere figure 
of speech, "Hypocrite lecteur mon semblable 
mon frere ! " I can see my surprised colleagues: 
He has called us musical lounge lizards, now we 
are calico cats ! What the next recrudescence ? 
In Hindu-land what Avatar? I remember the 
sage advice of Vance Thompson: When all 
trumps fail, write about your liver! He was 
speaking of criticism. Musical trumps are, as 
a rule, mesugah, in the classic parlance of 
pinochle; hence I fall back on a hypothetical 
hepatic condition, i. e., calico cats and criticism; 
criticism of music, art, literature, or mixed. 
120 



CONCERNING CALICO CATS 

Swinburne's theory that "I have never been 
able to see what should attract a man to the 
profession of criticism but the noble art of 
praising" was vitiated in practice by the poet 
himself, who wrote scurrilously of any one who 
disagreed with him. "After all, what are crit- 
ics?" asked Balzac, and later Disraeli-Beacons- 
field. "Men who have failed in literature and 
art." Mascagni, the Single-Speech Hamilton of 
Italian composers, cried aloud in resentment 
that a critic was only a "compositore mancato." 
(Probably some fellow musician had wounded 
him with a pen.) 

But every one is a critic, a calico cat, your 
gallery god, as well as the most stately practi- 
tioner of the gentlest art. The difference be- 
tween your criticism and mine, as I have re- 
marked elsewhere, is that I am paid for mine, 
and you must pay for your privilege to criticise. 
As some Paris wit said of a certain actress: 
"She is not beautiful, she is worse." A critic 
is never unjust he is worse. Nevertheless, I 
prefer the plain critic's opinions rather than the 
professional pronouncement of a composer. He 
always knows more than the critic, yet I doubt 
his attitude, which is seldom disinterested. 
How could it be? Why should it be? Schu- 
mann, who "discovered" Chopin and Brahms, 
missed Wagner. In Wagner he met his critical 
Waterloo, and as George Moore wrote of Ruskin 
vs. Whistler: "It is the lot of critics to be remem- 
bered by what they have failed to understand." 
121 



BEDOUINS 

Berlioz also missed Wagner Wagner who had 
helped himself so generously to the ideas on 
instrumentation of the Frenchman. But Balzac 
did not miss Stendhal, whose generation refused 
to recognize his genius. The "creative" critics 
are few. Montaigne, Goethe, Sainte-Beuve, 
Taine, Baudelaire, Georg Brandes, Nietzsche, 
Pater, Benedetto Croce, Havelock Ellis, Mat- 
thew Arnold, Arthur Symons, Anatole France, 
De Gourmont, Edgar Saltus, Brownell the list 
might be spun out, but these names suffice. Yet 
my idol among them, Sainte-Beuve, missed Bal- 
zac, Stendhal, Flaubert, and to Victor Hugo 
was inconsiderate possibly on account of his 
affair with Adele Hugo. Consider the Osrics of 
literature eternally embalmed in the amber of 
Sainte-Beuve's style, a fatal immortality for so 
many futile butterflies, and you will admit that 
he still lives when many a mighty reputation 
has withered. 

In sheer wonderment George III asked how 
the apples got inside the dumpling. How can 
a critic criticise a creator ! Oscar Wilde, shrewd 
enough when he so willed, has a middle term; 
critics who are "creative." But isn't he the 
man who looks on while the other fellow does 
things ! He should be artist as to temperament, 
and he should have a credo. And like most 
prima donnas, he is "catty." He need not be 
a painter to write of painting, a composer to 
speak of music. His primary appeal is to the 
public. He is the interpreter. The psycho- 
122 



CONCERNING CALICO CATS 

physiological processes need not concern us. 
There are the inevitable limitations. Describ- 
ing music in terms of prose is hopeless. The 
only true criticism of music is the playing 
thereof. We are again confronted by the Vance 
Thompson crux: write about your liver, or the 
weather, or calico cats, as I am now doing. All 
the rest is technical camouflage. Of course, a 
catholic critic doesn't mean an unprejudiced 
one. A critic without prejudices would be a 
faultless monster, and like Aristides the Just, 
should be stoned. 

Carl Van Vechten has told us of Erich Satie, 
the eccentric French composer, who sets snails 
and oysters to music, and, no doubt, has com- 
posed a Cooties Serenade for wind instruments 
with a fine-tooth comb obbligato, and we are 
amazed at the critical exposition of such a per- 
plexing "case." To let his music speak for it- 
self, would be unwise, as it is not sufficiently 
explicative. Rhizopods can't converse. Just 
here is where your music-critic, your calico cat, 
intervenes. After Van Vechten has polished off 
his man, we feel that we know all about Satie, 
so much so that we never wish to hear a bar of 
his crustacean music. The difference between 
tweedle-dum and tweedle-dee is infinitesimal, 
but that very difference may contain great art. 

Professor, now Sir Walter Raleigh, has said 

that "Criticism, after all, is not to legislate but 

to raise the dead." Sometimes it raises hades. 

Millet declared that "there is no isolated truth"; 

123 



BEDOUINS 

Constable denied that a good thing is ever done 
twice, and Alfred Stevens the Belgian painter, 
not the English sculptor defined art as "na- 
ture seen through the prism of an emotion," 
thus forestalling the more pompous pronounce- 
ment of Zola in The Experimental Novel. 
These are not merely epigrams, but truths. On 
the other hand, recall what Velasquez is reported 
to have said to Salvator Rosa, according to 
Boschini and Carl Justi. Salvator had asked 
the incomparable Spaniard whether he did not 
believe Raphael to be the best of all the painters 
he had seen in Italy. Velasquez answered: 
"Raphael, to be plain with you, for I like to be 
candid and outspoken, does not please me at 
all." There were the mountains criticising, deep 
calling unto deep. All said and done, a ques- 
tion of temperament, this opinion of one great 
man about the work of another. 

Therefore, brethren, it behooves us to be 
humble, as pride goeth before a fall. Like the 
industrious crow, the critic, or, as you will, the 
calico cat, should hop after the sowers of beauty, 
content to pick up in the furrowed field the 
grains dropped by genius. At best the critic 
sits down to a Barmecide's feast, to see, to smell, 
but not to taste the celestial manna vouchsafed 
by the gods. We are only contemporaries of 
genius, all of us, and the calico cat is the badge 
of our tribe. But who dares confess this shock- 
ing truth? And who shall bell the calico cat? 



124 



XIII 
CHOPIN OR THE CIRCUS ? 

RATHER hotly I argued the question with my 
editor: "After all, music-critics are men and 
brethren," I said. "Except when they are sis- 
ters/' he ironically interposed. I sternly re- 
sisted a temptation to blush and continued: 
"Because I love Chopin must I forever write of 
his music tou jours perdrix! It's an indiges- 
tion of strawberries, clotted cream, and green 
eyes. I'm suffering from spring-fever. Let me 
write a story about the circus." "Why not 
Ibsen?" interposed my editor, who is subtle or 
nothing. "He was a grand man," I assented, 
"but in the present case he is only red-herring 
across the trail. Suppose I mix up Chopin with 
sawdust merely for the sake of the melange?" 
My chief assented, wearily. There are more 
important problems on the carpet than Chopin. 
Jim Beck vs. Pop Hylan in a catch-as-catch-can 
for the welter-weight championship. Or the 
celebrated Mrs. J. and the Beethoven-Hambur- 
ger steak controversy. Why not Chopin and 
sawdust? I retired with a thoughtful mien. 

Had I ever been to the circus? What a sin- 
gular question. Yet, yet ! No, I confessed 
to myself, I had not been to the circus for at 
125 



BEDOUINS 

least three decades. Critics are tame cats away 
from their regular guests. In the concert-room 
or at the play, armed with our little hammers, 
we are as brave as plumbers; but on a roof gar- 
den, in church, at a circus, or innocently slum- 
bering, we are the mildest gang of pirates that 
ever scuttled an American sonata or forced 
ambitious leading-ladies to walk the plank. We 
may go alone to the theatre with impunity and 
another fellow's girl, but at the circus we need 
a nurse to show us the ropes and keep us from 
falling under the elephants' hoofs. A private 
nurse not necessarily old say I, is the only 
safety for a critic out of his element; otherwise 
a sense of the dignity of our calling is not main- 
tained. 

Therefore, I swallowed my Chopin scheme 
without undue fervor and went to the circus. 
No matter which one. All circuses are in an 
attractive key to me. Thackeray said the same 
thing about the play, and said it better. Any 
circus will serve as a peg for my sawdust sym- 
bolism. Any Garden will do, so that it has a 
capitalized initial letter. (No allusion to Magi- 
cal Mary.) The circus ! What a corrective for 
the astringent Ibsen or the morbidezza of Sar- 
matia's sweet singer, Chopin! The circus. It 
is a revelation. One thing I regretted that I 
could not be a boy again, with dirty hands, a 
shining brow, and a heart brimming over with 
joy. Peter Pan! Oh! to recapture that first 
careless rapture, as Browning or some other 
126 



CHOPIN OR THE CIRCUS? 

writing Johnny said; surely he must have meant 
the circus, which is the one spot on our muddy 
planet where rapture rhymes with the sawdust 
ring. 

"Have you ever seen Hedda Gabler?" I asked 
of the Finland giantess. We were wedged in 
front of the long platform at the Garden, upon 
which were the Missing Link, the Snake-En- 
chantress, the Lion-Faced Boy, the English Fat 
Girl so fat the Human Skeleton, the Welsh 
Giant, the Lilliputians, tattooed men, a man 
with an iron skull, dancers, jugglers, gun-spin- 
ners, "lady" musicians, and the three-legged 
boy. Eternal types at the circus. The noise 
was terrific, the air dense with the aura of un- 
washed humanity. This aura was twin to the 
aura in a monkey-house. But I enjoyed my 
"bath of multitude," as Charles Baudelaire 
names it, and I should not have bothered the 
tall creature with such an inept question. She 
coldly regarded me: 

"No, I haven't seen Hedda to-day, but I re- 
member George Tesman always teased her with 
one question, 'What do you know about that, 
Hed?' Shoo! Sardou for mine." "Do you 
read George Blarney Shaw?" I persisted. "He 
ought to be in a cage here. He would draw 
some crowds. But I'm told he lives in Germany 
now on account of the beer." I backed away 
quickly as an East Side family consisting of a 
baker's dozen would allow. Why had I asked 
such a question of a perfect stranger? This 
127 



BEDOUINS 

giantess, I mused before the rhinoceros with 
the double prongs, is Finnish. That's why she 
knew the name of Hedda Gabler. Why didn't 
I speak of Rosmersholm? Rebecca West had 
Finnish blood in her veins. Careful, careful 
this Ibsen obsession must be surmounted, else I 
shall be inquiring of the giraffe if neck or noth- 
ing is the symbol of Brand. All or Nothing! 
of course. How stupid of me. Among the ani- 
mals I regained my equilibrium. Their odors 
evoked memories. Yes, I recalled the old-time 
circus, with its compact pitched canvas tent on 
North Broad Street, Philadelphia; the pink lem- 
onade, the hoarse voice of the man who en- 
treated us to buy tickets there were no mega- 
phones in those days the crisp crackling of the 
roasting peanuts, the ovens revolved by the 
man from Ravenna, the man from Ascoli, and 
the man from Milan. They followed the circus 
all the way from Point Breeze, and I swear they 
were to me far more human than the policemen 
who gently whacked us with their clubs when 
we crawled under the tent. 

The sense of smell is first aid to memory. As 
I passed the cages saluting our pre-Adamic 
relatives, bidding the time of day to the zebu, 
nodding in a debonair fashion to the yak, I 
could not help longing for my first circus. Again 
I saw myself sitting in peaceful agony on a 
splintery plank; again I felt the slaps and 
pinches of my tender-hearted Aunt Sue now 
in Paradise, I hope; again my heart tugged like 
128 



CHOPIN OR THE CIRCUS? 

a balloon at its moorings as the clowns jumped 
into the ring, grimacing, chortling, and fascinat- 
ing us with their ludicrous inhumanity. 

Other days, other ways. I sighed as I tore 
myself loose from the prehensile trunk of a too 
friendly baby elephant and passed into the huge 
auditorium where Gilmore had played. Ah ! the 
sad, bad, glad, dear, dead, tiresome, poverty- 
stricken, beautiful days when we were young 
imbeciles and held hands with a fresh "ideal" 
every week (sometimes two). Ah ! the senti- 
mental "jag" induced by peanut eating, and 
the chaste, odoriferous apes. 

It is time. We seat ourselves. I look about 
me. Two resplendent gentlemen wearing eve- 
ning clothes at high noon, after the daring man- 
ner of our Gallic cousins, toll a bell. I became 
excited. Why those three-and- thirty strokes? 
What the symbolism ! Chopin, or Ibsen; again, 
I groaned, and turned my attention to my 
neighbors, one of whom I could feel, though did 
not see. I raised my voice, employing certain 
vocables hardly fit to print. The effect was 
magical. "Johnny, take your feet out of the 
gentleman's collar. That's a good boy." It 
was the soothing voice of a mother. Bless her 
clairvoyance! I sat comfortably back in my 
seat. Johnny howled at the interference with 
his pleasure. I felt sorry for him. Childhood 
is ever individualistic, even pragmatic. But I 
only had one collar with me, and it was well the 
matter ended thus. 

129 



BEDOUINS 

Hurrah ! Here they come ! A goodly band. 
The clowns ! the clowns ! Some hieratic owl of 
wisdom has called the clown the epitome of 
mankind. He certainly stands for something, 
this "full-fledged fool," as good old Tody Hamil- 
ton used to write, and "surcharged with the 
Roe of Fun," which phrase beats Delaware shad. 
Odds fish! There was only one Hamilton. 
What a Rabelaisian list of names boast these 
merry clowns! If the years have passed over 
the skulls of these lively rascals, the jolly boys do 
not show them. The same squeaks, the identi- 
cal yodling, the funny yet sinister expression of 
the eyes, the cruel, red-slitted mouths not a 
day older than ten did I seem as they came tum- 
bling in and began their horse-play, punctuated 
with yelling, yahoo gestures, ribald ejaculations, 
and knock-about diversions. It must all mean 
something, this hooting, in the economy of the 
universe, else "life is a suck and a sell," as Walt 
Whitman puts it. As in a dream-mirror I saw 
Solness slowly mount the fatal tower when 
Hilda Wangel cries to him: "My my Master- 
builder!" She sings The Maiden's Wish, and 
he hears the harps of Chopin hum in the air. I 
rub my ears. It is not Hilda who is crying, but 
a pet pig in a baby carriage, wheeled by a chalk- 
faced varlet. How difficult it is to escape the 
hallucinations of the critical profession. I 
couldn't forget Chopin or Ibsen, even at the 
circus. 

It was a relief, after more bellmanship from 
130 



CHOPIN OR THE CIRCUS? 

the man with the shiny silk hat and spiked 
coat, when the elephants majestically entered. 
Followed the horses. Tumblers and wire-walk- 
ers, women who stood on their heads and smiled 
as they do in life, something like the " inverted 
pyramid," as James Hinton called modern civ- 
ilization plastic poseurs, Oriental jugglers, the 
show was let loose at last. Human projectiles 
were launched through mid air to the tap of a 
drum. My nerves forbade me to look at them, 
so I read a programme advertisement of wall- 
paper for bathrooms. Some people like such 
horrible sights. I do not. They dare not pre- 
cisely formulate to themselves the wish that 
"something" would happen, and if it does 
they shudder with sadistic joy. I close my eyes 
when the Whirl of Death or any other sensa- 
tional act is staged. " Something" might hap- 
pen. 

The mad dancers delight our rhythmic sense 
as they make marvellous arabesques. The 
chariot races stir the blood. The crash around 
curves, the patters of gleaming metal excite so 
that you stand up, and, brushing the feet of 
inevitable Johnny from your neck (notwith- 
standing his remonstrances), you shout with 
woolly mouth and husky voice. Instinctively 
you turn down your thumbs: "Pollice verso," 
which Bayard Taylor translated "the perverse 
police." You remember the Ger6me painting? 

"This beats Ibsen," I hilariously exclaimed 
to Johnny's mother. (She was a comely ma- 



BEDOUINS 

tron.) "His name is John, and when he gets 
home his father will beat him," she tartly re- 
plied. With the prevoyance of boyhood Johnny 
burst into despairing howls. I at once folded 
up my mind. A million things were happening 
in the haze of the many rings. The New Circus 
is polyphonic, or naught. 

Enough ! Filled to the eyes with the distract- 
ing spectacle, ear-drums fatigued by the blare 
and bang of the monster brass band, my collar 
quite wilted by Johnny's shoemaker, my temper 
in rags because of the panting, struggling army 
of fellow beings, I reached the avenue in safety, 
perspiring, thirsty, unhappy. Like Stendhal, 
after his first and eagerly longed-for battle with 
love, I exclaimed: "Is that all?" In sooth, it 
had been too much. The human sensorium is 
savagely assaulted at the twentieth century cir- 
cus. I was in pessimistic enough humor to 
regret the single ring, the antique japes of a 
solitary clown, and the bewitching horseman- 
ship of Mile. Leonie, with her gauze skirts and 
perpetual rictus. As a matter of fact, we 
wouldn't endure for five minutes the old-fash- 
ioned circus and its tepid lemonade. Where are 
the mullygrubs of yesteryear? But the human 
heart is perverse. It always longs for the penny 
and the cake in company, while ineluctable des- 
tiny separates them ever. Perhaps my editor 
was right. Render unto Chopin the things that 
are Chopin's; send Ibsen back to his Land of the 
Midnight Whiskers. Smell the sawdust at the 
132 



CHOPIN OR THE CIRCUS? 

Garden, not forgetting that the chilly, dry days 
are at hand when even Panem et Circenses shall 
be taboo; when pipe and prog and grog will be 
banned; when these United States shall have 
been renamed Puritania; when a fanatically sel- 
fish minority shall take all the joy from life. 
Ergo, carpe diem ! I thank you. 



XIV 
CARUSO ON WHEELS 

THAT trip was all the fault of Billy Guard, 
better known to the musical world as Signor 
Guglielmo Guardi though no relative of the 
famous painter of Venetian waterscapes by the 
same name; it is even rumored that Guardi 
originally hails from the "Ould Dart/' but that 
knotty question will be solved, no doubt, by 
future historians. He is none the less no-per- 
cent American in the shade. However, to my 
story. I was standing in the concourse of the 
Pennsylvania Station when Billy interrupted 
my meditation on the evils of near-beer. "Are 
you going with us?" he hospitably inquired. 
I was about to board the regular three o'clock 
train to Philadelphia and I cheerfully accepted 
his invitation. And then something happened. 
Not far from us a circle of spectators enclosed 
as a focal point the natty person of Enrico 
Caruso and a Red Cross girl. Evidently curi- 
osity had ascended to the blood-heat mark of 
the human thermometer. With difficulty was 
the mass kept from swamping the border of 
safety, and, literally, embracing the well-be- 
loved Italian tenor. What was he doing in 
suet a place at the uncanny hour of 2.30 p. M. ? 
134 



CARUSO ON WHEELS 

Singers operate their throats all night and sleep 
out the daylight. It was not difficult to guess 
that he was going to Philadelphia on the Metro- 
politan Opera House Special, which during the 
season leaves every Tuesday afternoon at 2.54, 
returning some time after 2 o'clock the next 
morning. The present intermezzo piqued my 
interest. I shouldered my diminutive frame 
through the mob, exclaiming, "Tickets, please !" 
and because of this official camouflage soon 
reached the centre of attraction. Attired hi 
garb of fashionable hue and cut, Signer Caruso 
held earnest converse with a pretty Red Cross 
nurse, whose face beamed with joy. Something 
had been given which pleased her sense of the 
fitness of things, and later I heard that Caruso 
had enrolled the names of his two sons as mem- 
bers of the Red Cross Association; both lads 
were then fighting in the Italian army; Caruso 
is patriotic. 

"Say, ain't dat guy Caroos?" was asked of 
me by one of the chaps at the news-stand. 
"Doesn't he get ten thousand dollars a night?" 
he further queried. "More," I replied. "Well, 
he don't look it," came the unexpected com- 
ment. Young America thus paid tribute to 
the absence of fuss and feathers in the person- 
ality of the singer. It is true Caruso does not 
look like the typical tenor of Italian opera, nor 
does he behave like one. There he was, happy 
as a boy out on a lark, the dingy December day 
not depressing him, and his spirits so high that 
135 



BEDOUINS 

we expected him to waltz with that gentle 
nurse on the finest dancing esplanade in the 
world. Nor did the young lady seem averse 
from the diversion. To the disappointment of 
the crowd by this time grown to monstrous 
size Caruso did not dance, contenting himself 
with lustily carolling a basketful of precious high 
notes as he descended to his drawing-room car. 
Manager Gatti-Casazza would have shuddered 
if he had been present. His supreme vocal 
planet prodigally wasting his golden wind in a 
hall bigger than the Metropolitan Opera House 
and no box-office in view ! Besides, it was fly- 
ing in the face of nature. Tenors always bundle 
up to the eyebrows; they do not speak, much 
less vocalize, and usually are as cross as the 
proverbial bear. Caruso, who has defied doctors 
and vocal hygiene since he opened his magical 
mouth, is a false beacon to other singers. His 
care-free behavior should be shunned by lesser 
men who attempt to bend the bow of this great 
singing Ulysses. 

But Caruso is careful about tobacco. He does 
not enter the compartment where others smoke. 
He prefers the odor of his own choice cigarettes. 
I never saw him without one, either in mouth 
or fingers. The despair he is of any throat 
specialist. He sits in company with his old 
friend, Signor Scognomillo, otherwise the Man- 
Mountain. Sits and smokes. He is to sing 
and so he doesn't talk, only smokes, or makes 
caricatures. Returning is another tale. In 
136 



CARUSO ON WHEELS 

hilarious mood, he orders carte-blanche supper 
for the chorus. He plays pranks on his fellow 
passengers. Even that most potent, grave, and 
bearded Signor, Manager Gatti, is forced to 
smile. Caruso is irresistible. He recalls the 
far-away days when he sang two operas every 
Sunday in the Teatro Mercadante at Naples 
or the good old summer-time at Salerno, when, 
during entr'actes, he would drop a string from 
his dressing-room window and draw up the 
fond prize sardine and cream-cheese sand- 
wiches. He was thin in those youthful days, 
and thin boys always have hollow legs that 
must be filled. Prosperity has not spoiled 
Caruso. He is human and tolerant, with a big 
heart, and he is devoid of professional mega- 
lomania. In common with oldsters I have railed 
betimes at altered musical tastes and often de- 
clared that in the days of my youth there were 
better singers. I still abide by this belief. 
There were vocal giants in those days; but there 
was not Enrico Caruso. 

Since my dear old friend Italo Campanini 
there has been no one to match Caruso. Italo 
was a greater actor, indeed more versatile. 
His Lohengrin, the first I ever heard, I shall 
never forget. Mr. Finck is happy in his sug- 
gestion that Caruso add Lohengrin to his long 
Hst of operatic portraits. I have heard tenors 
from Brignoli to Gayarre, from Campanini to 
Tamagno, Masini and Nicolini this second 
husband of Aunt Adelina Patti wasn't such a 



BEDOUINS 

mediocrity as represented by some critics; he 
suffered only from contiguity to a blazing star 
of the first magnitude yet no one possessed a 
tithe of the vocal richness of Camerado Enrico. 
Some have outpointed him in finesse, Bond; 
Tamagno could have outroared him; Jean de 
Reszke had more personal charm and artistic 
subtlety; nevertheless, Caruso has a marvellous 
natural voice, paved with lyric magic. It is 
positively torrential in its outpouring, and with 
the years it grows as mellow as a French horn. 
Why, there are men in this vast land of ours 
who would rather be Caruso than the Presi- 
dent of the United States of Europe. Can you 
blame them? In his golden prime, happily 
mated, full of verve, gayety and healthy 
well, his presence, apart from his art, consoles 
us for many a gray day on this ocky little orb 
we inhabit. 

The recognition of personality has become in 
my "middle-years" a veritable obsession. With 
Henry James I could say that "I have found 
myself, my life long, attaching values to every 
noted thing in respect to a great person." 
Please strike out "great" from this sentence 
and substitute "any"; any person is interest- 
ing to me. Himself exquisitely aware of the 
presence of others, Henry James placed his 
fastidious preference amid certain castes, social 
and artistic. Like Walt Whitman, I prefer the 
company of "powerful uneducated persons," and 
nothing inhuman or human is foreign to me. I 

138 



CARUSO ON WHEELS 

shouldn't be surprised to find more interesting 
"stories" among the members of the chorus 
than in the ranks of the "stars"; but the "stars" 
alone capture the curiosity of the public, and 
thus it is that I speak of some of them to-day 
instead of la bella ragazzina in Mr. Setti's 
forces. I was bundled on Manager Gatti's 
special car and promptly paid my fare to a 
conductor who suspiciously appraised my pres- 
ence; to him I was neither fish nor flesh, nor 
good red chorus. I should have liked very 
much to walk through the chorus car, but with 
Otto Weil on one side and Edward Ziegler on 
the other I couldn't escape; furthermore, young 
Ziegler thus admonished me: "Sir, it's no place 
for an elderly inflammable person, is that car 
full of pretty young song-birds; Pattis and 
Scalchis en herbe." I meekly submitted and 
found myself in a smoking-compartment where 
a card-table was promptly installed. 

A friendly game of old cat bridge-whist. 
Now, I play Bach inventions every morning, 
but I can't play cards. I despise card games, 
agreeing with my friend J. K. Huysmans, who 
asserted that a monument should be erected to 
the memory of the inventor of cards because 
"he did something toward suppressing the free 
exchange of human imbecility." If the dis- 
tinguished French pessimist and master of 
jewelled prose could have been with us that day 
he might have revised his polite judgment. 
Such gabbling. Such "kachesse," such feminine 
139 



BEDOUINS 

squabbles. No hotel piazza on the Jersey coast 
of an August afternoon could have held a can- 
dle to the shrewd repartee and vivacious wran- 
gling over a few painted pasteboards. Antonio 
Scotti, drumming on the table the rhythm of 
the Rataplan, would suddenly scowl, and, with 
Scarpia-Uke intensity, demand: "Why you play 
that ace?" And Technical Director Siedle 
would groan in reply. A flash of lightning 
from a blue sky. Then Otto Weil banged down 
his cards and audibly expressed his opinion of 
his partner's playing. It is not fit to print. 
Judels never turned a hair, and he isn't bald. 
Even Scotti relaxed for a moment his ferocious 
Neapolitan air. No one can "stay mad" long 
with Judels. Pan Ordynski drops in, and 
Am'ato, Chalmers, or Althouse. Scotti is smoke- 
proof. It is pleasant to record that this big 
operatic organization with its divers national- 
ities is en route a happy family. Music, after 
all, is the solvent, the real melting-pot of which 
we hear so much and see so little in every-day 
fife, 

Caruso is not the only f unmaker on the wheels 
of this Opera Special. Rosina Galli of the 
dainty, tapering toes and woven paces is al- 
ways rollicksome. Her imitations would make 
her fortune in vaudeville. Signor Gatti philo- 
sophically reposes after the fatigue of travel and 
Union League Club terrapin. Scotti munches 
chicken, resting after his Sergeant Sulpizio 
140 




From a photograph by De Strelecki 

ROSINA GALLI AS THE PRINCESS IN "LE COQ D'OR" 



CARUSO ON WHEELS 

r61e, and still strums the Rataplan. Caruso 
smokes. Friend Scognomillo sleeps with one 
eye open. Florence Easton, wrung from her 
triumph as Santuzza, is there. In a compart- 
ment sits Geraldine Farrar. She sips coffee. 
Her mother is with her. So are chicken sand- 
wiches. "Our Jerry" is bright-eyed and keyed 
up as might be expected. I mention the name 
"Sid" Farrar, my boyhood's idol. The ladies 
become sympathetic. When I stoutly declared 
that I had never fallen in love with a prima 
donna during four decades as a music reporter, 
my "specialty" being admiration of the mothers 
of singers, the air is charged with interrogation- 
marks. Why hasn't some authoritative pen 
been employed in behalf of the mother of the 
singer who has succeeded ? What a theme ! 
What peeps into a family inferno! I think 
that Mrs. Farrar could write a better book 
about her brilliant daughter than did Mrs. Lou 
TeUegen of herself. 

Another time I talk with Frieda Hempel, 
who is one of the rapidly dwindling race of 
artists who know Mozart as well as Donizetti. 
What a Marguerite she would be ! On the train 
she is like her contemporaries. She sits. She 
chats. For all I know, she may doze. Singers 
are very human. To fancy them as "gloomy, 
grand, and peculiar" is to imagine a vain 
thing. In private they behave like their butch- 
ers, bakers, candlestick makers. If they have 
141 



BEDOUINS 

one weakness peculiar to their tribe, it is never 
to read newspaper criticism of their perform- 
ances! This is discouraging for music-critics. 
But the public likes sentimental flimflam, and 
the opera singer is pictured as a strange and 
fearful bird of prey; when seen at close range 
she is in reality a domesticated fowl. The much- 
advertised artistic temperament is only inter- 
mittent; even arrant bohemians are normal at 
least twice every twenty-four hours. 

The call is sounded. Again New York! A 
jumble of voices is heard in the smoking-com- 
partment. " If you hadn't played that trump ! " 
it is Judels speaking. "Oh!" groans Papa 
Siedle. Scotti is now whistling the Rataplan. 
The blond Ordynski, having wished the Polish 
curse on Otto Weil "may you have hangnails 
and dandruff!" dons his greatcoat. "Addio, 
Hunekero ! " sings Caruso. After refusing Ned 
Ziegler's kind offer of "First Aid to Flatbushers," 
which means his private car, I find myself 
alone on the chilly concourse. The hour of dis- 
illusionment, three past midnight. I've been on 
and off wheels with Caruso for twelve times 
sixty minutes. I ponder Flatbush and the possi- 
bilities of getting there by dawn. The scrub- 
women are at work, a new postwoman saunters 
along. The luncheon-room cat rubs against 
me, almost coos with joy. I slink away, being 
superstitious regarding cherry-colored cats, step- 
ladders, and cross-eyed theatre managers. (I 
142 



CARUSO ON WHEELS 

am writting plays.) Then, resigned to the in- 
evitable, I seek my trusty Glenn Curtiss hydro- 
aeroplane, which is anchored in the Thirty-third 
Street enclosure, and fly home to Flatbush-by- 
the-Sea. I've had a crowded and enjoyable day. 



143 



XV 
SING AND GROW VOICELESS 

SING and grow voiceless! Why not? We 
know of a dozen methods that are guaranteed 
to ruin even a Rose Ponselle vocal equipment 
in thirty lessons by mail, better known as ab- 
sent treatment. We have had over forty years' 
experience in the fair land of song, a scarred 
battle-field strewn with the shards and wrecks of 
beautiful voices and high hopes. In no sphere 
of music are there so many sharks, cormorants, 
swindlers, humbugs, criminals, as in the ranks 
of vocal teaching so-called. The hard-earned, 
carefully saved money of parents is extorted 
from victims, who usually return home with 
health impaired, voices gone, even worse. It 
is pitiful. It is cruel. What are you going to 
do about it? The profession of medicine is 
protected. Why not music? Malpractice is 
swiftly punished. Why not lock up the ras- 
cals who ruin a voice and get money under false 
pretenses? No, chewing gum in public is of 
far more importance to people; now a national 
neurosis, it will soon be elevated to the dignity 
of a Fine Art. If we had our way we should 
drive every one of these vocal parasites who in- 
144 



SING AND GROW VOICELESS 

fest the temple of music into the swamp of 
public odium. 

Now, having worked off my chronic bad 
humor, let us look at the matter through the 
spectacles of the absurd. There is a comic side 
to everything, from a volcano to a prohibition- 
ist. The fake singing-teachers are as funny as 
their fakery is pernicious. 

I am reminded of all the pamphlets from How 
to be Happy Though Divorced, How to Starve 
and Grow Fat when I read the pompous pro- 
nouncements of certain Voice Builders. I con- 
fess that I am not an expert in vocal hygiene, 
but I have heard all the great men and women 
for the past half-century who have made this 
drab, dreary planet worth living on with their 
beautiful voices. And that is a brevet of taste. 
Standards. Without standards we critically 
perish, says, in effect, Mr. Brownell. I also 
confess that I don't know a resonator from a 
refrigerator, or the difference between a lynx 
and a larynx. Both growl, I believe, if you rub 
them the wrong way. I have not the science of 
W. J. Henderson or Holbrook Curtis. But I do 
know when a singer slathers her phrases or sings 
above or below pitch and there are more who 
sing sharp than you think. The main thing is 
that I criticise by ear, not with a laryngoscope 
or a mirror to peep at the breath-control. 

Herbert Witherspoon, not unknown to fame 
as an operatic artist and concert singer, summed 
up for me the situation in a phrase. "Opera 
145 



BEDOUINS 

singers open their mouths too wide." Hence 
screaming and bawling which nearly splits 
sensitive ears. That the public likes shouting 
on top-tones is only evidence of the public's 
appalling taste. Noise, noise, noise ! We wor- 
ship noise in America. Another neurosis. 
Noise the Ultimate Vulgarity. At last the sub- 
way voice has penetrated our opera-houses; 
charmless, voiceless, vicious. The three dra- 
matic unities in the modern theatre have re- 
solved themselves into Legs, Glitter, Buncombe. 
On the lyric stage the chief unit is yelling. No 
wonder they sing and grow voiceless. Purdon 
Robinson, himself a concert singer of note, in 
the course of an instructive lecture recently re- 
marked: "My own opinion, backed by thirty 
years of singing and teaching, has resulted in 
the belief that a mechanical method makes a 
mechanical singer"; and "after the voice has 
been placed and one has it under control, forget 
it when singing. Try to get at the composer's 
meaning, realizing that words in themselves 
mean little, and that notes in music are simply 
the symbols by which musical ideas are indi- 
cated." For the average vocalist words are not 
symbols but cymbals. But Mr. Robinson's 
words are golden. 

Years ago (do sit still a moment, this is not a 
spun-out story of my life !) a young woman con- 
sulted me about a vocal master. She was a choir 
singer from the remote South, her parents poor 
as brewery mice are to be and she thought 
146 



SING AND GROW VOICELESS 

she had a remarkable voice. I say "thought." 
Care killed a cat. Thought never slew a larynx. 
I played a hymn tune. She sang. I shuddered, 
but was relieved when she told me that her 
name was Elvina Crow. After all, there is 
something to be said for Prof. Slawkenbergius 
and his theory of names as set forth by the 
veracious Rev. Laurence Sterne. I suggested 
that if she decided on a career she change her 
name to "Sgallinacciare," which appropriately 
enough means to crow; also a faulty method of 
singing. " Signorina Sgallinacciare ! " How that 
would ring in the credulous ears of the dear old 
deluded public, which, Hamlet-like, doesn't know 
a hawk from a hand-saw, or, if you prefer, a 
hernshaw. Shriek and grow rich ! Nothing else 
matters but "mazuma" in the box-office of the 
Seven Deadly Arts. 

It must have been a month after our interview 
that Miss Crow again visited me. I was at the 
time assistant professor of applied paleontology, 
and mightily interested in the psychic life of 
micro-organisms, so naturally singers came first 
on the list. Into my large and sympathetic 
tympani Elvina poured a tale, not of woe, but 
of thrilling truth. This is not the first time I 
have related it, yet it improves on repetition, 
just because of its probability. Not discouraged 
by my slurring, even portamento, criticism of 
her voice, the lone girl bravely started to find 
out the truth herself; the real test of charac- 
ter. She said that her first experience was in 
147 



BEDOUINS 

the studio of a maestro. She had a letter to him 
which he barely read. In a rich Italian brogue 
he bade her be seated. He wore a velvet 
jacket. He was bald. He smoked cigarettes. 
The type was perfect. 

" I giva da lesson in fiva minuta," he explained, 
and then scowled at a tall girl who faced a mir- 
ror in a guilty manner as her eyes computed the 
possible value of the newcomer's gown. " Must 
I sit here like a fool?" the professor angrily de- 
manded. His pupil opened her mouth. Elvina 
eagerly listened. But no sound escaped the 
lips of the other girl. She gazed into the mirror 
and mouthed and grimaced, and almost, though 
not quite, formed words. "Faster," cried the 
teacher at the keyboard. The student's lips 
moved like a praying mill; she clicked her teeth 
Castanet fashion; and at last with a wild bang 
on the keyboard the voiceless aria ended. The 
maestro knitted his dyed eyebrows. " Vara fair, 
not presto assai. You sing without expression. 
You are too cold what shall I call it?" A 
husky voice asked: "Shall I try it over again?" 
"Dio mio ! girl, how dare you speak after singing 
such a difficult aria from Rossini's Cinderella? 
Your vocal pores are open, you perspire with 
your lungs pouf ! You die of the inflamma- 
tus by, by" he impatiently pulled at his large 
nose. "The Inflammatus by Rossini, you 
mean!" interposed Elvina. "How? No, no, 
ah ! by pneumonia, that's it." And he bustled 
from the instrument. Throwing an old bearskin 
148 



SING AND GROW VOICELESS 

rug over his speechless singer, he led her to a 
chair, admonishing her : ' ' Now perspire ! ' ' She 
coughed in a terrifying way while the maestro 
imperturbably explained his method to Elvina. 
He did not permit his pupils to open their mouths 
for a year, during which time he put them 
through a severe throat and lung drill. All songs 
were given in vocal miming, with due facial ex- 
pression, and the ventriloquist was adduced as 
the highest type of masterly vocal control, for a 
ventriloquist can sing in his stomach without 
moving a muscle of his face. Think of Fred 
Stone and his Very Good Eddie. The Signer 
became eloquent. Had the young Miss Elvina 
Corpo di Baccho ! what a pretty name ! had 
she a little money for tuition? One thousand 
dollars. Dirt cheap. A second Patti she would 
become for the money. Sign a contract with 
him for ten years. Then the movies for a year 
so that her stage nervousness would wear off, 
then vaudeville, et puis done grand opera. 
A ravishing prospect. He rolled his eyes ecstati- 
cally as he took Elvina's ten-dollar bill. She 
escaped. To her taste the method seemed a 
trifle too swift. 

In another part of the town she found the 
atelier of Mme. Boche. She was about to enter 
the anteroom unannounced when she heard low 
moaning sounds, which presently increased in 
volume and intensity, then suddenly died away 
in a sickening style. It seemed as if some ani- 
mal were undergoing vivisection, and Elvina, her 
149 



BEDOUINS 

sympathies aroused, pushed open the door with- 
out knocking. It was a strange sight that met 
her indignant gaze, a sight that set her wonder- 
ing, and soon smiling. On a huge mattress, 
which occupied half the room, were a dozen 
girls in seaside bathing costume. They lay on 
their backs, and upon their diaphragms rested 
twenty-pound weights, and from their closed 
lips issued the moans made by their respiration. 
The Madame, a high-nosed old dame, stood by, 
rattan cane in hand, and in militarist accents 
gave her commands: "One, two, three inhale! 
Hold breath! Shoulders up ! Relax! Down!" 
And the class went patiently through this ven- 
tral drill until completely fagged. After the 
order to arise a babel of chatter ensued as Elvina 
told the Madame of her aspirations and the 
amount of cash she possessed. 

"Na ! I have the only system for the breath- 
ing. My pupils know how to breathe, how to 
breathe, and, again how to breathe. There is 
one necessary thing in singing, the breath. If 
my pupils can't stand my system I send them 
forth." 

Elvina positively feared this martinet. Her 
pupils' figures were lanky. She mildly inquired 
when they sang. " What, sing ? Niemals, never, 
jammai, jamais de la leben ! You heard them 
breathing? Did they breathe or no?" Then 
turning to her class she resumed: "Young ladies, 
attention! Fall down! Relax!" Elvina slipped 
150 



SING AND GROW VOICELESS 

away, muttering as she went: "Calisthenics, not 
art." It had cost her another ten dollars. 

After a hurried Automat luncheon she pro- 
ceeded to a cross town street, the address of 
which she had read in the newspapers. The 
window displayed this sign, " Professor Erasmus 
Brick, Voice Builder." He was a burly gentle- 
man, the Prof. His linen was not irreproach- 
able, his forehead looked like a mansard roof, 
and his eyes were shrewd. She named her 
errand, confided her doubts, hinted at the pov- 
erty of her purse. He laughed, and his voice 
restored her courage, if not her confidence. 
"My dear Miss, cast your eye round this room 
and see if I have a piano, a looking-glass, a pul- 
someter, or any other foreign fiddle-faddle of 
those Signers or Fraus. I build the voice up 
into the perfect thing the good Lord intended 
it to be, and without any extry fixin's or bricks 
and mortar. The job is simple if you know how. 
All this gabble about vocal registers and nasal 
emission makes me tired. I build up a voice 
on the word 'Moo'; jest keep 'em right at that 
word till the old cow so to speak dies of the 
tune. While you sing I work this pocket-fan. 
I use it to fan away the breath as you sing 
'Moo.' By this means the lungs are unob- 
structed and the voice grows of its free accord. 
My theory is that the breath kills the voice 
Moo!" Elvina passed out, and in the hall a 
phonograph hoarsely sang: "Do, re, mi, fa, sol. 



BEDOUINS 

Five dollars. Please put the cash on the man- 
telpiece." "That's a dollar a note," she calcu- 
lated. She paid, and her bank-roll became omi- 
nously slender. 

She found Mile. Pinson in her apartment, 
small, stuffy, crowded with rickety furniture, 
books, china, music, even a parrot. The lady 
was drinking chocolate. "Via, Mamselle ! I've 
purchased a frugal meal, is it not? I diet my- 
self as carefully as in the days when I was lead- 
ing soprano at the Grand Opera. Helas ! those 
miserable days when I was so happy. Oh, Paris ! 
Now sing ' la/ Mamselle. No, no, louder, please. 
C'est bon. You must know that when you sing 
correctly the vibrations travel to the knee-caps. 
I test them and know exactly if the tone is 
formed naturally or not. My vibratory system 
is the only true one. Yes, twenty dollars will 
be enough for this time. You have a sweet 
voice, my dear, and I'll make a great singer of 
you in five years." Elvina faintly asked : ' ' When 
do I begin on songs ? " " What ! Songs ? Ah ! 
those Americans, they are always in a hurry, 
what you call get rich in a week! My child, 
you can't hurry art. Bonsoir, Mamselle ! To- 
morrow at nine, precisely, and I'll test your 
knee-caps. Take one of my pamphlets. Vibra- 
tion, vibration, vibration !" The parrot opened 
its beak: " Vibration, vibration, vibration. I'm 
in for life, ch6rie. Take me out of jail, che"rie." 
Elvina sat in a Madison Avenue tram and read 
the booklet of Mile. Mimi Pinson, entitled Hy- 
152 



SING AND GROW VOICELESS 

giene for Voiceless Singers. Numerous rules 
and "Don'ts," ending with, "Don't marry. 
Husbands of opera-singers always collect their 
wives' salaries. Vibrate when you breathe. 
You may achieve fame and happiness. Think 
blue! It is the color of hope. Vogue la galere !" 
"This is becoming monotonous," said Elvina 
aloud, and gritting her teeth she packed her duds 
and returned to her home town with only one 
dollar and twenty-five cents in her pocket. 
However, family affection, above all family flap- 
jacks, restored her jarred nerves to their normal 
pitch. From time to time she sends me pro- 
grammes of concerts in which she is described: 
"Our native song-bird, Elvina, Prima Donna 
Dissoluta." As Esther Beautiful Queen (newly 
reorchestrated by Stravinsky) she made a "real 
hit." She may have exaggerated a little hi her 
confidences, but I can personally vouch for the 
heavy weights on pupils' chests to promote 
breathlessness. There was advocated such a 
vocal system two or three decades ago in New 
York. Sing and grow voiceless ! Basta ! 



153 



XVI 

ANATOLE FRANCE: THE LAST 
PHASE 

ANATOLE FRANCE is seventy-six years old, but 
his mind is still vigorous, if that word be not 
too brisk when applied to such a subtle, supple, 
undulating intelligence as his. He now writes 
prose glowing with patriotism. Like the late 
Remy de Gourmont he shed his cynic's skin 
when war invaded his beloved land. And it 
was not the first time that he, a writer of human- 
itarian impulses, opened the door of his ivory 
tower and descended into the stormy arena; 
witness the Dreyfus case. However, it would 
be idle to deny that his best work is well behind 
him. Prefaces to letters to distinguished men 
and women he occasionally publishes, such as 
Sur la Voie Glorieuse, or Ce que disent nos 
morts; but the Anatole France of La Revoke 
des Anges seems to have vanished forever. In 
the vast whirlwind of European events his scep- 
ticism, irony, and pessimism have given way to 
pity and tenderness for human suffering. The 
son of the bookseller Thibaut may figure, some 
day, in a modern hagiography of those lay- 
saints who fought for a new spiritual freedom. 

The subject-matter composing Sur la Voie 
154 



ANATOLE FRANCE 

Glorieuse is altogether patriotic and contains 
much that is striking. The cloven hoof of the 
original faun that lurks somewhere in this 
Frenchman's temperament is shown in a pas- 
sage wherein he groups the Christmas festival 
with other antique festivals and symbols of 
Adonis and Mithra. A pagan to the end. Pos- 
sibly the best pages are devoted to a free trans- 
lation from Herodotus, a dialogue between the 
potentate Xerxes and a Spartan slave. The 
moral rings clear. Of quite different material is 
fashioned The Revolt of the Angels. We can- 
not conscientiously recommend the fiction to 
elderly persons of either sex, though, no doubt, 
it is favorite reading of the "advanced" college 
girl. What would be vulgarity in another writer 
is turned to favor and prettiness by the wand 
of the Gallic enchanter. Violence, rapine, hiss- 
ing irony, and Rabelaisian episodes make a feast 
for lovers of Anatolian literature. Those who 
have retained any old-fashioned prejudices con- 
cerning propriety morality is out of the run- 
ning may expect to be shocked. Has he not 
said: "Man, seek not to know thyself ! Man is 
not a reasoning animal." 

In this fable the deity that created us is in 
the new cosmology only a tribal god, who, since 
he deposed Lucifer in pitched battle, rules ty- 
rannically. He keeps close watch on our mud- 
pie of a planet because he suspects that numer- 
ous angels disguised as men and women are 
fomenting a second angelic rebellion. With 
155 



BEDOUINS 

them are the socialists and anarchists, and this 
gives M. France an opportunity to score monar- 
chical forms of government. The clerical order 
is lashed. He spares no one. He repeats his 
familiar axiom: "Les guerres sont tou jours les 
affaires." There are pages in which sensuality 
and sheer burlesque are mingled in a disquieting 
compound. The book is one of the most dar- 
ing. In its essence it is a supreme revolt against 
all social systems that uphold slavery: indus- 
trial, militaristic, religious, political. The de- 
basing Asiatic systems that still make captive 
the conscience of mankind are mercilessly at- 
tacked, and while the castigating hand is in- 
cased in velvet the shining steel is none the less 
deadly. 

Constable, the English landscapist, said that a 
good thing can't be done twice. Anatole France 
has demonstrated the contrary in his latest, let us 
hope not his last book, Le Petit Pierre, another 
series of exquisite notations of childhood. His 
delightful Livre de Mon Ami gave us glimpses of 
his early days. Fascinating are the chapters de- 
voted to Pierre and Suzanne in this memoir. 
The tenderness of M. France, and his power of 
summoning up the wonder and awe of our youth, 
may be seen in Abeille; the development of the 
lad is followed in Pierre Noziere. A portrait of 
the young Anatole reveals his excessive sensibil- 
ity. His head was large, the brow too broad for 
the feminine chin, though the long nose and firm 
mouth contradict possible weakness in the lower 

156 



ANATOLE FRANCE 

part of the face. It was in the eyes that the 
future of the child might have been read they 
were lustrous, in shape beautiful, with a fulness 
that argued eloquence and imagination. Such 
eyes were possessed by the boy Charles Dickens. 
France has told us that he was a strange child, 
whose chief ambition was to be a saint, a second 
St. Simon Stylites, and after that thrilling ex- 
perience to write a history of France in fifty 
volumes! In Le Petit Pierre his memory for 
the important little events of a child's exist- 
ence is unusual; evidently nothing has been in- 
vented, all happened. Through the haze of the 
immemorial years there now and then sharply 
shines some significant incident, some old wives' 
tales, a portrait of an elderly contemporary 
like the Balzacian Uncle Hyacinthe or the in- 
comparable evocation of the beloved servant 
Melanie a dog, like Caire, the truant parrot, 
the boy chimney-sweep, and the sweet smile of 
Pierre's mother, who seems to be every one's 
mother so admirably generalized is the type 
what a magician is this writer! Told with 
naivete and verve, we feel in every page of Le 
Petit Pierre the charm of personality. 

In clarity Anatole France is the equal of 
Renan and John Henry Newman, and, while at 
one time clarity was a conventional quality 
of French prose, it is rarer to-day. Symbolism 
has supervened, if not to darken counsel, cer- 
tainly to trouble verbal values. Never synco- 
pated, moving at a moderate tempo, in transi- 
157 



BEDOUINS 

tions smooth, replete with sensitive rejections, 
crystalline in diction, a lover and a master of 
large, luminous words, the very marrow of the 
man, Anatole France is in his style. And what 
a model he should be for those wilful young 
writers who boast that lumpy, graceless para- 
graphs are better suited to their subjects than 
swift, clear, concise prose. It was not so long 
ago that one scribe positively glorified in his 
own dull style; he asserted that it was a truth- 
ful reflection of his drab themes. There is, in- 
deed, such a thing as an apposite garbing, a 
verbal orchestration. The pellucid sentences of 
Mr. Howells, so free from the overblown, are 
happily wedded to his admirable character etch- 
ing. Flaubert, master of ornate, or " numer- 
ous" prose, as well as cool, rhythmic prose, 
wrote Salammbo in a purple, splendid key, and 
Madame Bovary in the greyer tonalities of the 
province; yet nothing could be further removed 
from the style of either novel than Sentimental 
Education, which is urban and suffused with 
sober daylight. It was a favorite contention of 
de Gourmont that at his sovereign best Flaubert 
is to be found in Bouvard et Pecuchet, the style 
of which is sinewy, pregnant, powerful. The 
principal mistake of beginners is to believe that 
ornament is good style. In Anatole France 
matter and manner are perfectly welded. 

Few writers swim so easily as he under their 
heavy*burdens of erudition. His knowledge is 
precise, his range wide. He is a humanist. He 
158 



ANATOLE FRANCE 

knows many literatures. He loves learning for 
the sake of learning. He loves words, treasures 
them, fondles them, burnishes anew their mean- 
ings tarnished by custom. He seldom tarries in 
the half-way house of epigram. Over all, his 
interest in humanity sheds a tranquil glow. 
Without a marked feeling for the dramatic, 
nevertheless, he surprises mankind engaged in 
its minute daily acts; those he renders as can- 
didly as snow in the sunshine; just as the old 
Dutch painters stir our "emotion of recognition " 
with a simple shaft of light passing through a 
half -open door, or upon an old wrinkled woman 
polishing her spectacles. He sees and notes 
many gestures, inutile or tragic, and notes them 
with the enthralling simplicity of a complicated 
artistic nature. He deals with ideas so vitally 
that they seem human. Yet his personages are 
never abstractions, nor do they serve as pallid 
allegories. They are all alive from Sylvestre 
Bonnard to the group that meets to chat in the 
Foro Romano (Sur la Pierre Blanche) ; from his 
Penguins to his Angels. A dog, a cat, he de- 
picts with the same love; his dog Riquet bids 
fair to endure in literature. France is an in- 
terpreter of life, not precisely after the manner 
of the novelist, but life as viewed through the 
temperament of a poet of extreme delicacy and 
one doubled by a tolerant philosopher. 

This ultramodern thinker, who has outgrown 
the despotism of positivist dogma, has the soul 
of a chameleon. He loves, he understands, 



BEDOUINS 

Christianity with a fervor and a knowledge that 
surprise, until we measure the depth of his 
affection for antique cultures. Further to con- 
fuse us, he exhibits sympathy with the Hebraic 
lore. He has rifled the Talmud for half-forgot- 
ten tales. He delights in juxtaposing the Greek 
sophist and the strenuous Paul. He contrasts 
Mary Magdalen repentant with a pampered 
Roman matron. He is familiar with the pro- 
ceeds of science, particularly astronomy. With 
the scholastic speculations of the Renaissance, 
with the simple affirmations of mediaeval piety, 
he is as conversant as with the destructive pyr- 
rhonism of a boulevard philosopher. So com- 
mingled are his contradictory cultures, so nu- 
merous his angles, so avid of impressions is he, 
that we end in wholly admiring the exercise of 
a beneficent magic that can blend into a happy 
synthesis moral dissonances and harmonize such 
a bewildering moral preciosity. But there are 
moments when we regard the operation as intel- 
lectual legerdemain. We suspect dupery. How- 
ever, it is his humor that is the most potent of 
his solvents. This humor often transforms a 
doubtful battle into radiant victory. We see 
him, the protagonist of his own psychical com- 
edy, dancing on a tight rope in the airiest fash- 
ion, deliciously capering in the metaphysical 
void, and, like a prestidigitator, bidding us doubt 
the very existence of his rope. 

Proofs from life gay pagan Anatole does not 
demand. He has the hesitations of profound 
160 



ANATOLE FRANCE 

erudition. Possessing the gift of paradox, he 
rejoices in his philosophic indifferentism. Not- 
withstanding his famous phrase, "the mania of 
certitude," Renan was ever pursued by the idea 
of an Absolute. He cried for proof. To Ber- 
tholet he wrote: "I am eager for mathematics." 
To him numbers promised rigid reality. Not 
so, however, to M. France, who could have 
asked with Ibsen whether two added to two do 
not make five on the planet Jupiter ! To Mon- 
taigne's "What know I?" he opposes the injunc- 
tion of Rabelais: "Do what thou wilt!" Of 
Plato he might have asked, "What is Truth?" 
and if Plato in turn would have posed the same 
question, Anatole could reply by handing him a 
copy of Jardin d'Epicure, that perfect breviary 
of Anatolian scepticism. In Socrates perhaps 
he would discover a congenial companion; yet he 
might mischievously allude to Montaigne "con- 
cerning cats," or quote Aristotle as to the form 
of hats. And then we spy him adorning the 
Wheel of Ixion with garlands. A wilful child of 
belles-lettres and philosophy, M. France always 
may be expected to utter the starting, lucent 
phrase. 

He believes in the belief of God. By the 
gods of all times and climes he swears. His the 
cosmic soul. A man who infuses into his tales 
something of the Mimes of Herondas, La Bru- 
yere's Characters, and the Lucian Dialogues, 
with faint flavors of Racine and La Fontaine 
superadded, may be pardoned his polychromatic 
161 



BEDOUINS 

faiths. This chromatism in creeds, a trust in 
all or none, is rather diverting. But the classic 
world of thought shows several exemplars for 
M. France, from the followers of Aristippus to 
the Sophists. Nevertheless, there is a specific 
note of individuality, a roulade altogether Ana- 
tolian in the Parisian. No one but this accom- 
plished sceptic could have devised The Opinions 
of Jerome Coignard, and his scheme for a Bureau 
of Vanity (Villiers de ITsle Adam invented a 
machine for manufacturing glory). "Man is an 
animal with a musket," declares Anatole. Here 
is a morsel for hypocrites: "Even virtue may be 
unduly praised. Since it is overcoming which 
constitutes merit, we must recognize that it is 
concupiscence which makes saints. J ' This sounds 
like William Blake done into choice French; 
Blake who has said that "the fool cannot enter 
the kingdom of heaven be he ever so pious"; 
that Blake who believed that the road to wis- 
dom lies through the valley of excess. 

Henry James has declared that the province 
of art is all life, all feeling, all observation, all 
vision. According to this rubric, M. France is 
a many-sided artist. Philosopher as well, he 
plays with the appearances of life, lifting be- 
times the edge of the curtain to curdle the blood 
of his spectators with the sight of Buddha's 
shadow in some grim cavern beyond. He shows 
his Gallic tact in decorating the empty spaces 
of theory and the blank spots of reality. A fol- 
lower of Kant, in his denial of the objective, we 
162 



ANATOLE FRANCE 

cannot imagine him approving of that sage's 
admiration of the starry heavens and the moral 
law. Both are relative, would be the report of 
the Frenchman. Yet he yearns for faith. He 
humbles himself beneath the humblest. He ex- 
cels in exposing the splendor of the simple soul, 
though faith has not anointed his intellect with 
its chrism. He admires the golden filigree of 
the ciborium; its spiritual essence escapes him. 
At the portals of Paradise he lingers, or stoops 
to pick a rare and richly colored feather. He 
eloquently vaunts its fabulous beauty. But he 
hears not the whirring of the wings whence 
it has fallen. Pagan in his irony, his pity 
wholly Christian, Anatole France betrays a 
nuance of Petronius and a touch of St. Francis. 
Because of this spiritual dislocation or dare I 
say bilocation ? he is in art, letters, and life a 
consummate flowering of the dilettante. 



163 



XVII 
A MASQUE OF MUSIC 

HERE is an evocation of a projected Masque 
of Music. Not a Miltonic hymn in praise of 
the melting art, nor yet an Alexander's Feast 
celebrating its power, after the manner of John 
Dryden, but a grandiose vision which would 
embrace the legend of sound from its unor- 
ganized beginnings to the to-morrow of the ulti- 
mate Kalmuck. It is written with such men as 
Reinhardt, David Belasco, Gordon Craig, Stan- 
islavsky, Michel Fokine, and Richard Ordyn- 
ski in view. They, or artists of their calibre, 
might make the idea viable in the theatre. 
What music would best envelope my Masque is 
a question answered by the composers whose 
names are figuratively deployed. Or what gifted 
American composers might "set" the Masque in 
a symphonic poem! Where this kaleidoscope 
would be produced and how many evenings it 
might need for complete interpretation are puz- 
zles I do not seek now to solve; suffice to add, 
that I have for the sake of dramatic unity placed 
myself at the centre and circumference of this 
prose recital, as sensations are veritable hallu- 
cinations for me. In a performance the spec- 
tators would occupy the same relative position. 
164 



A MASQUE OF MUSIC 

. . . The curtains of Time and Space drew apart. 
I stood on the cliff of the World, saw and heard 
the travailing and groaning of light and sound 
in the epochal and reverberating void. A pedal- 
bass, a diapasonic tone that came from the 
bowels of the firmament, struck fear to my 
heart; this tone was of such magnitude as might 
be overheard by the gods. No mortal ear could 
have held it without cracking. This gigantic 
flood, this cataclysmic roar, filled every pore of 
my body. It blew me about as a blade of grass 
is blown in a boreal blast, yet I sensed the pitch. 
Inchoate nature, the unrestrained cry of the 
rocks and their buried secrets crushed aspira- 
tions, and the hidden sorrows of mineral, plants, 
and animals became vocal. It was the voice of 
the monstrous abortions of nature, the groan of 
incomplete or transitional types, born for a 
moment and shattered forever. All God's mud 
made moan for recognition. 

It was night. The strong fair sky of the 
South was sown with dartings of silver and 
starry dust. I walked under the great wind- 
bowl with its few balancing clouds and listened 
to the whirrings of the infinite. I knew that I 
was close to the core of existence, and though 
sound was less vibratile than light, sound touched 
earth, embraced it, and was content with its 
eld and homely face. Light, a mischievous 
Loge; Sound, the All-Mother Erda. I walked on. 
My way seemed clearer. . . . 

Reaching a plain, fabulous and mighty, I 

165 



BEDOUINS 

came upon a Sphinx, half-buried in sand and 
looming in the starlight. As I watched her face 
I felt that the tone had ceased to surround me. 
The dawn filtered through the dark and there 
were stirrings abroad in the air. From afar 
sounded a fluttering of thin tones. As the sun 
shone rosy on the vast stone, like a clear-colored 
wind came back the tone from the sea. And in 
the music-filled air I fell on my knees and wor- 
shipped the Sphinx, for music is a window 
through which we gaze upon eternity. Then 
followed a strange musical rout of the nations; 
I saw defile before me Silence, "eldest of all 
things"; Brahma's consort, Saraswati, fingered 
her Vina, and Siva and his hideous mate, Devi, 
sometimes called Durga; and the brazen heavens 
were like a typhoon that showered appalling 
evils upon mankind. All the gods of Egypt 
and Assyria, dog-faced, moon-breasted, and 
menacing, passed playing upon dreams, making 
choric music, black and fuliginous. The sacred 
Ibis stalked in the silvery footsteps of the 
Houris; the Graces held hands. Phoebus Apollo 
appeared. His face was as a shining shield. 
He improvised upon a many-stringed lyre of 
tortoise-shell, and his music was shimmering and 
symphonious. Hermes and his Syrinx wooed 
the shy Euterpe; the maidens went in woven 
paces, a medley of masques flamed by, and the 
great god Pan breathed into his pipes. 

I saw Bacchus pursued by ravening Maenads, 
saw Lamia and her ophidian flute, as Orpheus 
166 



A MASQUE OF MUSIC 

sorrowfully sped, searching his Eurydice. Nep- 
tune blew his wreathed horn. The Tritons gam- 
bolled in the waves. Cybele changed her cym- 
bals. And with his music Amphion summoned 
rocks to Thebes. Jepthah danced to her death 
before the Ark of the Covenant, praising the 
Lord God of Israel. Unabashed behind her 
leered the rhythmic Herodias, while were heard 
the praiseful songs of Deborah and Barak as 
St. Caecilia smote the keyboard. With her 
timbrel Miriam sang hymns of triumph. Before 
the Persian Satrap on his purple litter Abyssinian 
girls, their little breasts carolling to the sky, 
alluringly swayed; the air was crowded by the 
crisp tinklings of tiny bells at wrist and ankles 
as the Kabaros drummed; and hard by in the 
brake brown nymphs moved in languorous 
rhythms, droning hoarse sacrificial chants. The 
colossus Memnon hymned, priests of Baal 
screamed as they lacerated themselves with 
knives, Druid priestesses crooned sybillic incan- 
tations. And over this pageant of Woman and 
Music the proud sun of old Egypt scattered 
splendid burning rays. 

From distant strands and hillsides came the 
noise of unholy instruments with names, sweet- 
sounding, and clashing. Nofres from the Nile, 
Ravanastrons of Ceylon, Javanese gongs, Chi- 
nese Pavilions, Tambourahs, Sackbuts, Shawms, 
Psalteries, Dulcimers, Salpinxes, Keras, Tim- 
brels, Sistra, Crotala, double flutes, twenty- 
two stringed harps, Kerrenas, the Indian flute 
167 



BEDOUINS 

called Yo, and the quaint Yamato-Koto. Fol- 
lowed fast the Biwa, the Gekkin, and its cousin 
the Genkwan; the Ku, named after a horrid god; 
the Shunga and its cluttering strings, the Sama- 
sien, the Kokyu, the Vamato Fuye which 
breathed moon-eyed melodies the Hichi-Riki, 
and the Shaku-Hachi. The Sho was mouthed 
by slant-haired yellow boys, while the sharp roll 
of drums covered with goatskins never ceased. 
From this bedlam there occasionally emerged a 
splinter of tune like a plank thrown up by the 
sea. No melody could I discern, though I 
grasped its beginnings. Double flutes gave me 
the modes: Dorian, Phrygian, ^Eolian, Lydian, 
Ionian; after Sappho and her Mixo-Lydian mode 
I longed for a modern accord. 

The choir went whirling on with Citharas, Re- 
becs, Citoles, Domras, Goules, Serpents, Crwths, 
Pentachords, Rebabs, Pantalons, Conches, Flag- 
eolets made of Pelican bones, Tams-tams, Caril- 
lons, Xylophones, Crescents of beating bells, 
Mandoras, Whistling Vases of clay, Zampognas, 
Zithers, Bugles, Octochords, Naccaras or Turk- 
ish Castanets, and Quinternas. I heard blare 
the two hundred thousand curved trumpets 
which Solomon had made for his Temple, and 
the forty thousand which accompanied the 
Psalms of David. Jubal played his Magrepha. 
Pythagoras came with his Monochord. To the 
music of the Spheres Plato listened. The priests 
of Joshua blew seven times upon Shofars, or 
rams-horns. Then fell the walls of Jericho. To 
168 



A MASQUE OF MUSIC 

this came a challenging blast from the terrible 
horn of Roland of Roncesvalles. The air had the 
resonance of hell as the Guatemalan Indians wor- 
shipped their Black Christ upon the Plaza; and 
naked Ishtar, Daughter of Sin, stood shivering 
before the Seventh Gate. A great silence en- 
sued. I saw a green star drop over Judea and 
thought music itself were slain. The pilgrims 
with their Jew's-harps dispersed into sorrowful 
groups. Blackness usurped the sonorous sun. 
There was no music in all the universe, and this 
tonal eclipse lasted long. From remote coasts 
came faint cries: The Great God Pan is dead! 
They have slain Our Lord and we know not 
where to find Hun. . . . 

I heard as if in a magic mirror the submerged 
music of Dufay, Okeghem, Josquin Depres, Or- 
lando di Lasso, Goudimel, and Luther; the cathe- 
dral tones of Palestrina, the frozen sweetness of 
Arezzo, Frescobaldi, Monteverde, Carissimi, Tar- 
tini, Corelli, Scarlatti, Jomelli, Pergolesi, Lulli, 
Rameau, Couperin, Buxtehude, Sweelinck, Byrd, 
Gibbons, Purcell, and the Bach; with their Lutes, 
Monochords, Virginals, Harpsichords, Clavicy- 
therums, Clavichords, Cembalos, Spinets, Theor- 
bos, Organs, and Pianofortes, and accompanying 
them an army, vast, formidable, of the immemo- 
rial virtuosi, singers, castrati, the night-moths 
and midgets of music. Like wraiths they waved 
desperate ineffectual hands and made sad mim- 
ickings of their dead and dusty triumphs. . . . 
Again I heard the Chromatic Fantasia of Bach, 
169 



BEDOUINS 

ever new, yet old. In its weaving sonant pat- 
terns were the detonations of the primeval world 
I had just left; also something disquieting and 
feminine. But the Man predominates in Bach, 
subtle, nervous, magnetic as he is in this Fan- 
tasia. 

A mincing, courtly old woman bows low. It 
is Joseph Haydn, and there is sprightly malice in 
his music. The glorious periwigged giant of 
London conducts a chorus of a million. The 
hailstones of Handel pelt the pate of the Sphinx. 
"A man!" I cried, as the very heavens stormed 
out their cadenced hallelujahs. A divine youth 
approaches. His mien is excellent, and his voice 
of rare sweetness. His band discourses ravish- 
ing music. The primeval tone is there, but fem- 
inized, graceful; troupes of painted stage players 
in fallals and furbelows present pictures of 
rakes, rustic maidens, and fantastics. An or- 
chestra minces as Mozart disappears. Behold, 
the great one approaches, and beneath his Jovian 
tread the earth trembles ! Beethoven, the sub- 
lime peasant, the conqueror, the god ! All that 
has gone before, all that is to be, is globed in 
his symphonies, was divined by this seer. A 
man, the first since Handel! And the eagles 
triumphantly jostle the scarred face of the 
Sphinx. Von Weber prances by on his gayly 
caparisoned arpeggios, Meyerbeer and Verdi fol- 
low; all three footlight folk. Schubert, a pan- 
pipe through which the wind discourses exquisite 
melodies; Gluck, whose lyre is stringed Greek 
170 



A MASQUE OF MUSIC 

fashion, but bedecked with Parisian gauds and 
ribbons; Mendelssohn, a charming, girlish echo 
of Bach; Chopin and Schumann, romantic wres- 
tlers with their muted dreams, strugglers against 
ineffable madness and sorely stricken at the end ; 
Berlioz, a primitive Roc, half-bird, half-human, 
also a Minotaur who dragged to his Crete all 
the music of the Masters; and the Turk of the 
keyboard, Franz Liszt, with Cymbalom, Czardas, 
and crazy Kalamaikas pass. But suddenly I 
noted a shriller tonal accent, the accent of a 
sun that has lost its sex, a sun that is stricken 
with moon-sickness. A hybrid appears, fol- 
lowed by a cohort of players. A huge orchestra 
plays straightway; the Sphinx wears a sinister 
smile. . . . 

Then I saw the tone-color of each instrument. 
Some malign enchanter had diverted from their 
natural uses every member of the tonal army. 
I saw the strings in rainbow hues, red trumpets, 
blue flutes, green oboes, purple clarinets, horns 
glorious golden yellow, scarlet trombones, dark- 
brown bassoons, carmilion ophecleides, as the 
drums punctured space with ebon crepitations. 
That the triangle always had been silver I never 
questioned, but this new chromatic blaze, these 
novel tin tings of tone what did they portend? 
Was it a symbol of the further degradation and 
effeminization of music? Was art become as the 
sigh of a woman? A vain, selfish goddess was 
about to be placed on high and worshipped ; soon 
the rustling of silk would betray her sex. Re- 
171 



BEDOUINS 

leased from the wise bonds imposed upon her 
by Mother Church, music is now a parasite of 
the emotions, a modern Circe whose "feet take 
hold on hell," whose wand enchants men into 
listening swine. Gigantic as antediluvian ferns, 
as evil-smelling and as dangerous, music in the 
hands of this magician is dowered with ambigu- 
ous attitudes, with anonymous gestures, is color 
become sound, sensuality masking as chaste 
beauty. This Klingsor evirates, effeminates, 
disintegrates. He is the spirit who denies all 
things natural, and his revengeful theatric music 
goes about in the guise of a woman. She has- 
tens its end, its spiritual suicide is at hand. I 
lifted my eyes. Surely I recognized that short, 
dominating figure conducting the orchestra. 
Was it the tragic comedian, Richard Wagner? 
Were those his mocking, ardent eyes fading in 
the morbid mist? 

A fat, cowled monk stealthily marches after 
him. He shades his eyes from the fierce rays of 
the Wagnerian sun; to him more grateful are 
moon-rays and the reflected light of lonely forest 
pools. He is the Arch-Hypocrite of Tone, and 
he speaks in divers tongues. Brahms it is and 
he wears the mask of a musical masquerader. 
Then swirled by a band of gypsies, with guitars, 
castanets, and led by Bizet. Spain seemed 
familiar land, Spain with the odors of the bou- 
doir. Gounod and Faust go simpering on tip- 
toe; a disorderly mass of Cossacks stampeded 
them, Tchaikovsky at their head. They yelled 
172 



A MASQUE OF MUSIC 

as they banged upon resounding Svirelis, Bala- 
laikas, and Kobzas, dancing the Ziganka all the 
while. And as a still more horrible uproar was 
heard I became suddenly conscious of a change 
on the face of the Sphinx; streaked with grey 
it seemed to be crumbling. As the clatter in- 
creased I diverted my regard from the massive 
stone and beheld an orgiastic mob of men and 
women howling and playing upon instruments of 
fulgurating colors and vile shapes. Their skins 
were white, their hair yellow, their eyes of vic- 
torious blue. 

"Nietzsche's Blond Barbarians, the Apes of 
Wagner!" I exclaimed, and I felt the ground 
giving away. The naked music, pulsatile and 
opium-charged, turned hysterical as Zarathustra- 
Strauss waved on his myrmidons with frenzied 
philosophical motions. Music was become ver- 
tiginous, a mad vortex wherein whirled mad 
atoms madly embracing. Dancing, the disso- 
nant corybantes of the Dionysiac evangel scarce 
touched earth, thus outvying the bacchantes. 
The roar of enemy cannon pursued them as the 
last Superman yielded his ghost to the Time- 
Spirit. . . . 

Then there gravely marched a group of men 
of cold cerebral expression. They carried steel 
hammers with which they beat upon their anvils 
the whole-tone scale. Near by hovered Arnold 
Schoenberg with Claude Debussy, but they put 
their fingers into their pained ears as the Neo- 
Scythians, Scriabine Stravinsky, Ornstein and 
173 



BEDOUINS 

Prokofieff hammered with excruciating dynamics 
hell itself into icy enharmonic splinters. With 
thunderous peals of ironic laughter the Sphinx 
sank into the sand, yawning as it vanished and 
mumbling: "No longer are there dissonances, 
Nothing is true. All is permitted!" By a 
mighty effort to escape the nipping arctic air 
and the harsh grindings of impending icebergs, 
I fled. 
And that is my Masque of Music. 



174 



PART II 
IDOLS AND AMBERGRIS 

" Idols and ambergris and rare inlays. . . ." 

Ezra Pound. 



I 

THE SUPREME SIN 

'Et Diabolus incarnatus est. Et homo factus est." 
From the Litany of the Damned Saints. 

"Shall no new sin be born for men's trouble?" 

Swinburne. 

*' Let us deny Satan!" 

-Sar Piladan. 



IDLY tapping the metal-topped table of the 
cafe with his stick, Oswald Invern waited for 
the Hollin boys. They had promised, the night 
before, to be punctual. It was past eleven and 
the pair had not turned up; he was bored, ir- 
ritated. If they couldn't remember their en- 
gagement, well and good; but why ! 

"Oswald, have we kept you waiting?" in- 
toned two pleasant tenor voices. There they 
were at last! Oswald made room for them on 
the divan and at once the twin brothers be- 
gan smoking. Harry fetched a pipe from the 
bulging pocket of his coat and Willy lighted a 
cigarette. It was their pet affectation to pre- 
tend that they disliked any suggestion of twin- 
ship. Willy wore high heels and fashionably 
cut clothes so as to appear taller than his 
177 



BEDOUINS 

brother, while Harry sported Bohemian velvet 
and a broad-brimmed hat. But both agreed 
as to art and brotherly love. People endured 
them for these salient traits, though Oswald 
declared that it only made them the more 
stupid. 

"No headache this morning, Oswald?" 
"No heartache this morning, Oswald?" 
The young man envied them as they pulled 
their fan-shaped beards and sipped their ver- 
mouth-citron. They were in key with the 
cosmos and he was not. 

"Neither one nor the other," he absently 
replied. 

"But is not Miss Tilney a charmer? I saw 
you looking at her the entire evening. Come 
now, say?" Harry Hollin spoke with en- 
thusiasm. Invern slowly shook his head and 
he continued to gaze down the Boulevard de 
Vaugirard. The cafe stood at the meeting of 
this boulevard and the Place du Maine, across 
from the Gare Mont-Parnasse. The Avenue 
du Maine intersected the Place and, while be- 
yond lay the choicer precincts of the Quarter, 
there was no spot on the "left bank" that was 
gayer in silent weather or duller when the rain 
fell. This particular morning the sky reported a 
delicate pigeon-blue, a nuance that occasion- 
ally may be seen in Paris after a storm; it had 
withdrawn above the housetops and was im- 
measurably far away; a melochromatic horizon 
was tinged with flushes of pink and ochre. 
178 



THE SUPREME SIN 

The twins followed Oswald's eyes and boiled 
over ecstatically: 

"What tones!'' cried Harry. 

"I could model them in precious gems!" ex- 
claimed his brother. 

"There you go, with your atelier slang," 
muttered their companion. " I've been in Paris 
ten years longer than you and you beat me as 
a Frenchman." 

"Qa ne biche pas?" Harry continued. "It's 
lovely." 

"Oui, c'est kif kif!" chimed his brother. 
Invern watched them, the echo of a smile 
sounding across his compressed lips. He was 
not more than twenty-eight; a slender figure 
proclaimed his youth. The head was well set 
on his shoulders. It was the expression of his 
.frowning forehead and large, dark, heavy eyes 
that made the man look much older. Not 
dissipation, rather discontent, marred features 
of a Byzantine type. Yes, he had been thirteen 
years in Paris and these foolish good-hearted 
fellows only three; but they knew the argot of 
the Beaux-Arts better than he, and they openly 
boasted their anti- Americanism. He asked 
them: 

"Frankly, what are you going to do with 
yourselves in America when you get there?" 
They answered in happy unison: "Make 
money." 

He shook his head. 

"Make money by selling tombstones that's 
179 



BEDOUINS 

you, Willy! and painting society dames in 
impossible attitudes, tints, and expressions 
that's you, Harry." 

"Never mind us, Invern. You may never 
go, but if you do a comic opera with a howl- 
ing success is our wish." 

"I'll never return now," said Invern. 
"The cursed microbe of artistic Paris is in my 
system. And, what's more, I'll never do any- 
thing. When a Yankee comes over here to 
paint he tries to paint like a Frenchman. Look 
at the three Salons with their half-baked imi- 
tations. Let me finish" the brothers had 
lifted angry shoulders " and if a Yankee 
studies music here he composes French music 
ever afterward French music which is a sad 
mixture of German and Italian; eclectic style, 
the wise ones call it." 

"And if he goes to Germany?" demanded 
Harry. 

"Then he composes German music." Sud- 
denly Willy stood up. 

" I have solved the mystery. This pessimism, 
Oswald, is the result of of why, you're 
in love, man ! I know her name. It's Miss 
Tilney June Tilney. The secret is out." 

"Is her name June?" asked Oswald irrele- 
vantly. 

"It's June and she's rich as the sound of her 
name." The Hollin boys were irrepressible 
this gay morning. 

"So! But why June?" 
180 



THE SUPREME SIN 

"You're interested. Listen," interpolated 
Harry. "She's a Yankee girl with a Russian 
mother or had one and she was educated 
in London, Russia, Italy, Germany, Paris " 

" Go on ! Why not New York ? " 

"She never saw New York, but she speaks 
United States." 

"And," added Willy, "the Count hates it 
like the dickens." 

" What a pair of rattles you are ! Who's the 
Count?" 

"Why, Count Van Zorn, her guardian, of 
course. Haven't you met old Van Zorn yet? 
He's very musical, goes to all the swell musical 
Salons of Paris, to the Princesse de Brancovan, 
to the Comtesse de Blanzay, to Duchesse de 
Bellune, to the Princesse de Bibesco " Oswald 
held up his hands in consternation. 

" Stop ! I don't care a sou where he goes. 
Who is he?" 

"He's very rich and looks after June Tilney's 
affairs. And they say wants to marry her 

only thirty years' difference she won't 
have it, though she likes the old codger and is 
seen everywhere with him and they say the 
Rasta he's from Roumania or South America 

goes in for magic and puts spells upon the 
girl." 

"Drop the mufle," interrupted Oswald. "The 
main thing now is breakfast. And, incidentally, 
why don't you marry the girl yourself, Willy?" 

"C'est Bibi!" exclaimed Harry, pointing 
181 



BEDOUINS 

to himself. "Willy has signed over all rights 
and interests to his loving brother. And we 
have the cabot on the run he will be here in 
five minutes "; the brothers were embarrassed 
after this statement. Their friend stared at 
them shrewdly for a moment and then laughed 
one of his rare " Rosmersholm " laughs, as the 
brothers had christened such a happening. 

"So that's the game? Coming here to de- 
jeuner! Miss June with him?" They blushed 
over the tops of their beards. Invern began 
grumbling. 

"Oswald !" exclaimed the boys deprecatingly; 
they were fond of him, notwithstanding his 
frowns and gloomy moods. A waiter was sum- 
moned and the order given for the mid-day meal. 
" Five plates, Louis, and have the whitest table 
linen in the house, please !" 

After the introductions Oswald again ad- 
mired the girl he had seen the previous night. 
She had accompanied the fraternal pair much 
against the wish of her guardian to a ball in the 
Quarter and she had not, she said, found it 
wonderfully diverting. The color of her eyes 
was hazel they were wide with golden flecks 
in them, the same curious gold as her hair 
and her little ears and nose with its tiny nos- 
trils, that became inflated when she was inter- 
ested, held the gaze of the young man. Under 
his dyed eyebrows Count Van Zorn regarded 
the company. It was not quite to his liking, 
the Hollin brothers soon discovered, so they 
182 



THE SUPREME SIN 

engaged him in conversation and paid him ex- 
aggerated compliments. His bird-like profile, 
with the dull, prominent eyes, moved slowly 
from one brother to the other. 

" Who's your friend?" he finally asked. He 
was told all sorts of impossible things; Invern 
was the coming composer; he had not arrived 
yet, but ! The Count grunted. He had 
heard this blague before. In Paris all your 
artistic friends are just about to, but never do, 
arrive. Miss Tilney spoke to Invern. 

"It is charming to think of an American giv- 
ing up his great country for the sake of music 
preferring notes to gold." He made a gesture 
of disapproval. 

"Ah, don't play the modest genius," she gayly 
cried. "You know, I am very sensitive to 
genius. I've never heard your music, yet I'm 
sure you are doomed to greatness or sorrow." 
She added these last two words under her 
breath. Oswald heard them. He started and 
looked into her eyes, but he might as well have 
questioned two pools of light; they reflected no 
sentiment, nor did they directly return his 
glance. Across the table the Count made a 
motion and she colored; he summoned at the 
same time the attention of the young composer. 

"You write music, do you?" he asked in a 
grating voice. "I am a composer myself. I 
studied with a great Russian musician, now 
dead. I- 

"Tell us about Sar Merodack Peladan," in- 

183 



BEDOUINS 

terrupted the vivacious Willy; "tell us if you 
ever witnessed his incantations." Every one 
but the Count and Invern laughed. The girl 
rapidly said something to her guardian. It 
must have been in Russian. He shook his head. 

"Not to-day," he answered in French. 

"No secrets!" the brothers adjured. At last 
the crowd began to modulate into that hazy 
amiable humor which follows a copious break- 
fast. As they drank coffee conversational 
themes were preluded, few developed; the ball 
of dialogue was lightly tossed and Oswald no- 
ticed that Miss Tilney could, at will, be Ameri- 
can, French, German, Russian, and English, 
and again Russian. Like a many-colored skein 
she unwound her various temperaments accord- 
ing to her mood. With him she was sombre; 
once she flashed anger at the Count and showed 
her teeth; for the two Hollins she played any 
tune they wished. The real June Tilney 
what was she? Oswald wondered. But, when 
he fancied himself near the edge of a revelation, 
his mind must have collided with her guardian's 
Van Zorn's expression was repellent. Invern 
greatly disliked him. The talk drifted to art, 
thence to religion, and one of the Hollins jested 
about the Devil. Count Van Zorn fixed him 
at once. 

"No one must mock sacred things in my 
presence," he coldly announced. The others 
were startled. 

"M. Van Zorn!" said Miss Tilney. Oswald 
184 



THE SUPREME SIN 

saw her hands fluttering in nervous excite- 
ment. 

"I mean it," was the firm response of the 
Count. "The Devil is the mainspring of our 
moral system. Mock him and you mock God 
who created him. Without him this world 
would be all light without shadow, and there 
would be no art, no music the Devil is the 
greatest of all musicians. He created the chro- 
matic scale that's why Richard Wagner ad- 
mired the Devil in music what is Parsifal but 
a version of the Black Mass ! Ah ! it is easy to 
see that Wagner knew Baudelaire only too well 
in Paris, and was initiated into the mysteries 
of Satanism by that poet who wrote a Litany 
to Lucifer, you know, with its diabolic refrain !" 
These words were fairly pelted upon the ear- 
drums of his listeners. The girl held her peace, 
the brothers roared at the joke, but Invern 
took the phrases as a serious insult. He arose 
and bowed. 

"The Count sees fit to insult my art very 
well! But I am not compelled to hear any 
more." Before he could leave June plucked at 
his sleeve and tried to hold him; stranger still 
was the behavior of the old man. He reached 
across the table, his hands clasped in supplica- 
tion. 

"My dear young man," he panted, "I meant 
no offense. Pray be seated. I adore your art 
and practise it daily. I am a devout Wagnerian. 
I was but repeating the wisdom of certain an- 

185 



BEDOUINS 

cient Fathers of the Church who ascribed, not 
without cause, the origin of music to Satan. 
Do not be annoyed. Beg of him, June, not to 
go." Invern fell back in his seat bewildered 
by this brusque cannonade. The Count held 
up t his ten skinny ringers. 

"These claws," he cried, "are worn to the 
bone on the keyboard. I belong to an antique 
generation, for I mingle music and magic. 
Credit me with good intentions. Better still, 
visit me soon to-night June, we go nowhere 
to-night, hein ! Perhaps as you do not believe 
in the existence of the Devil, perhaps music 
my music may " 

Oswald received a shock, for a small foot was 
placed upon his and pressed down with such 
electric vigor that he almost cried aloud. It 
told him, this foot, as plainly as if its owner 
had spoken: "Say no! Say no!" Responding 
to a stronger will than his own, he did not 
answer. 

"Ha, you fear the Devil! But I assure you 
the Devil is a gentleman. I have met him, 
conversed with him." His voice filed down to 
a brittle whisper and to the acute perception of 
the young man an air of melancholy enveloped 
the speaker. Oswald hung his head, wondering 
all the while. Was this fanatic really in his 
sane senses? And the girl what part did she 
play in such a life? Her voice cut sharply 
across his perplexity. 

"Dear guardian, stop your Devil talk. I'm 
sick of it. You spoil our fun. Besides, you 
186 



THE SUPREME SIN 

know the Devil is not a gentleman at all the 
Devil is a woman." Shocked at the very tone 
of her voice, almost as harsh and guttural as 
her uncle's, Oswald intercepted a look rapidly 
exchanged between the Count and his ward. 
The blood rushed to his head and he slowly 
balled his fists. Then he arose: 

"I don't know what you boys expect to do 
to-night, but I'm going to see the Devil I 
mean the Count; that is, if he does not with- 
draw his invitation." The Rollins looked re- 
gretfully at Oswald and Miss Tilney. She had 
upset the salt and was slowly passing the tips 
of her fingers over its gritty surface, apparently 
dreaming, leagues distant. The Count was al- 
most amiable. 

"Ah, my dear June, I shall at last have an 
auditor for my bad Wagner playing! I live, 
Monsieur Invern, around the corner in the little 
Impasse du Maine, off the Avenue. We are 
neighbors, I think, and perhaps it may interest 
you to know that we, June and myself, inhabit 
the old atelier of Bastien Lepage, where he 
painted Sarah Bernhardt, where, also, unfortu- 
nate Marie Bashkirtseff was often wheeled to 
see the dying painter." 

"Oh ! oh !" remonstrated the girl in a toneless 
voice, "first Devil-worship, and now studio scan- 
dal. Fie !" Her high spirits had vanished; her 
face was ash-grey as she bowed to Invern. 
After shaking hands with the brothers, Count 
Van Zorn turned to him and said: 

"Don't forget eleven o'clock. Impasse du 



BEDOUINS 

Maine. The Devil perhaps; anyhow, Wagner. 
And the Devil is a gentleman." He tittered, 
baring his gums, his painted eyebrows high on 
his forehead. 

"The Devil is a woman/' tremulously insisted 
the girl. "Have you forgotten Klingsor and 
his 'Rose of Hell'?" With Van Zorn she dis- 
appeared. 

II 

When he reached his room Invern sat on the 
bed. These new people puzzled him. He had 
shaken off the Hollin brothers, telling them 
they were idiots to have introduced such an old 
lunatic to him. 

"But we thought you liked occult Johnnies !" 
had been their doleful answer; and then Oswald 
bade them seek the old Nick himself, but leave 
him to his own thoughts; many had clustered 
about his consciousness during that afternoon; 
the principal one, the girl. Who was she ? With f 
all the boastings of the brothers that Count 
Van Zorn was welcome in distinguished musical 
circles, Oswald made up his mind to a decided 
negative. That man never went into the polite 
world nowadays, though he may have done so 
years before. An undefinable atmosphere of 
caducity and malodorous gentility clung to this 
disciple of music and the arts esoteric. How 
came it then that June Tilney, so mundane, so 
charming, so youthfully alert, could tolerate 
the vulture? What a vulture's glance suggest- 
188 



THE SUPREME SIN 

ing inexpressible horrors was his brief, warning 
look! Oswald grew dizzy. "By God!" he 
groaned, "no, not that! But surely some sort 
of diabolic business !" 

Why not go? Nothing but boredom could 
result at the worst, and boredom in his life was 
rapidly merging into a contempt for existence, 
contempt for this damnable Parisian morass. 
His ambition had winged away years before. 
Occasionally at dusk, on white summer nights, 
he seemed to discern a flash of some shining 
substance aloft, and felt his eyes fill, while in 
his ears he heard the humming of a" great col- 
ored melody. Then he would make marks in 
his note-book and the next day forget his infre- 
quent visitor; he believed in old-fashioned in- 
spiration, but when it did arrive he was too 
indifferent to open the doors of his heart. 

The Devil? Any belief but the dull, cynical 
unfaith of his existence, any conviction, even a 
wicked one, any act of the will, rather than the 
motiveless, stagnant days he was leading. Why 
not call on the Count ? Why not see June Til- 
ney again? He recalled vaguely the freshness 
of her face, of her presence. Yes, alert was the 
word, alert, as if she were guarding herself 
against an enemy. Ah ! hiding a secret. That 
was in her light fencing, feathery raillery, cold 
despondency, half-smothered anger, fierce out- 
burst, and, at the close, in her obstinate reiter- 
ation. What did it all mean? He sat on his 
bed and wondered. 



BEDOUINS 

And in the dim light of early evening he heard 
his name called, once, twice with the memory 
of June Tilney's warning earlier in the day 
pressing thick upon his spirit, he rushed into 
the hallway from whose vacancy came no re- 
sponse to his excited challenge. Yet he could 
have sworn to the voice, a soundless voice which 
had said to him: " Don't go! Don't go!" 
Oswald put on his hat, picked up his walking- 
stick, and left the house. . . . 



HI 

He wandered up and down the BouP Mich' 
obsessed by his ideas, and the clocks in the cafes 
were pointing to five minutes of eleven when 
he turned from the Avenue du Maine into the 
little street, closed at one end, which bears the 
name of the adjacent avenue. Invern had never 
been before in this Impasse du Maine, though 
he had passed it daily for ten years. He remem- 
bered it as a place where painters and sculptors 
resided; it was dark, and the buildings for the 
most part were dingy, yet his impression, as he 
slowly moved along the lower side of the street, 
was not a depressing one. He reached the 
number given him as the bells in the neighboring 
church began to sound the hour. He had not 
time to summon the concierge when a hand was 
laid upon his arm; a woman, wearing a hood, 
and enveloped in a long cloak, peered at him 
through a heavy veil. He knew that it was June 
190 



THE SUPREME SIN 

Tilney and his heart began to pump up the 
blood into his temples. She stooped as if en- 
deavoring to hide her identity, and in her hand 
she carried a little cane. 

"Don't go in!" she adjured the young man 
who, astounded by this apparition, regarded her 
with open-mouthed disquiet. 

"Don't go in there !" she again admonished 
him. "It means peril to your immortal soul if 
you do. I caution you for the second time." 

"But how can it harm me?" 

"I have warned you," she answered abruptly 
was this his June Tilney of the bright morn- 
ing airs? "and I repeat: it is my wish that 
you do not visit there to-night." Something in 
her tone aroused opposition. 

"Nevertheless, Miss Tilney, I mean to see 
the Devil to-night." 

"Then go see her! But deny her if you 
dare!" She vanished in a doorway across the 
street. . . . 

Shocked as was Oswald, he stolidly pulled the 
bell until the massive doors opened. A light at 
the end of a large, dim court showed him the 
staircase of the atelier. A moment later he had 
let fall a grinning bronze knocker in the image 
of a faun's hoof, and he had hardly time to ask 
himself the mystery of Miss Tilney's request, 
when he was welcomed by Count Van Zorn. 

Nothing could have been pleasanter than the 
apartment into which he was conducted. The 
Count apologized for the absence of the young 
191 



BEDOUINS 

lady Miss Tilney was a slave to social obliga- 
tions ! Invern winced. He looked about while 
the Count busied himself with carafe and 
glasses. Decidedly an ideal home for a modern 
wizard of culture. Book-shelves crowded with 
superb volumes, pictures of the Barbizon school 
on the walls, an old-fashioned grand pianoforte, 
an alcove across which was drawn black velvet 
drapery; everything signalized the retreat of a 
man devoted to literature and the arts. There 
were no enchantments lurking in the corners. 
Then his glance fell upon a warmly colored 
panel, a Monticelli, of luscious hues with richly 
wrought figures. It depicted a band of youths 
and maidens in flowing costumes, strayed revel- 
lers from some secret rites, but full of life's in- 
toxication; hard-by stood an antique temple, at 
its portals a wicked smiling garden god. And 
over all was the flush of a setting sun, a vivid 
stain of pomegranate. . . . The desk of the 
piano held an engraving. Invern approached, 
but turned away his head. He saw that it was 
by that man of unholy genius, Felicien Rops. 
The Count crossed to his visitor and smilingly 
told him to look again. 

"My Rops! You do not admire this Temp- 
tation of St. Anthony? No? Yet how differ- 
ent in conception from the conventional com- 
bination of the vulgar and voluptuous. Wag- 
ner's Parsifal is only a variation on this eternal 
theme of the Saint tempted by the Sinner. The 
Woman here is crucified what a novel idea !" 
192 



THE SUPREME SIN 

Invern was ill at ease. The place was not 
what it seemed. He read the titles of several 
imposing tomes: the Trait6 Methodique de Sci- 
ence Occulte, by Dr. Papus; Sar Peladan's 
Amphitheatre des Sciences Mortes, and Com- 
ment on devient mage; Au Seuil du Mystere and 
Le Serpent de la Genese, by Stanislaus de 
Guaita. Eliphas Levi, Nicolas Flamel, Ernest 
Bosc, Saint-Martin, Jules Bois, Nehor, Remy 
de Gourmont's Histoires Magiques, and many 
other mystics were represented. Upon the 
dados were stamped winged Assyrian bulls, the 
mystic rose, symbolic figures with the heads of 
women and anonymous beasts, lion's paws ter- 
minating in fish-tails and serpent scales. In- 
scriptions in a dead language, possibly Chaldean, 
streamed over the walls, and the constellations 
were painted in gold upon a dark-blue ceiling. 
Luini's Sacrifice to Pan, an etching of the picture 
in the Brera at Milan, caught his eye and he 
wondered why its obvious Satanic quality had 
been so seldom noted by diabolists. A cum- 
brous iron lamp of ornate Eastern workman- 
ship, in which burned a wisp of green flame, 
comprised all that was bizarre in this apartment; 
otherwise, the broad student's table, the com- 
fortable chairs and couches, did not differ from 
hundreds of other studios on the left bank of the 
Seine. 

Count Van Zorn coaxed Invern into a loung- 
ing chair and gave him a glass of wine. It was 
Port, of a quality that to the young man's pal- 
193 



BEDOUINS 

ate tasted like velvet fire. He was soon smok- 
ing a strong cigar in company with the old man, 
his fears quite obliterated. But his visitor noted 
that the Count was engrossed. As he sat, his 
eyes fastened upon the pattern of the polished 
parquet, Van Zorn looked like a man planning 
some grave project, perhaps a great crime. His 
head was hollowed at the temples, on his fore- 
head the veins were puffy, his eyebrows, black 
as ink in the morning, were now interspersed 
with whitish-gray the dye had worn away. 
At intervals he groaned snatches of melody, 
and once Invern heard him gabble in a strange 
tongue. 

"And the music and the magic!" broke in 
the young man, weary of this interval. Slowly 
Van Zorn arose and stared at him steadily with 
his bird-of-prey eyes. 

"Have you ever realized," he finally began 
in sing-song tones, "what an instrument for 
good or evil is the art you profess to practise? 
Hear me out," he continued, as the composer 
made a motion of dissent; "I don't refer to the 
facile criticism which classifies some music pro- 
fane, some music sacred. The weaklings who 
are hurt by sensual operatic music would be 
equally hurt by a book or a picture; I refer to 
the music that is a bridge between here and 
over there, over there!" His voice sank as he 
waved his lean brown fingers toward the alcove. 
"In the days of old, when man was nearer to 
nature, nearer to the gods, music was the key 
194 



THE SUPREME SIN 

to all the mysteries. Pan and Syrinx answered 
its magic summons. A lost art, lost with the 
vulgarization of the other beautiful arts, you 
say? I deny it!" He drew up his rickety 
figure as if he held the keys of a conquered city. 

"No! I repeat, music is still the precious 
art of arts and across its poisonous gulf of sound, 
on the other side, over there" again he pointed 
to the alcove, with its sable velvet funeral pall 
"the gods await our homage. Wagner a 
worshipper at the diabolic shrine pictured his 
faith in Parsifal. He is his own Klingsor, and 
the music he made for the evocation of Kundry 
came straight from the mouth of hell. Ah ! how 
it burns the senses ! How it bites the nerves' 
'Gundryggia there, Kundry here!' Yes, the 
gods and the greatest of all the gods, my master. 
Music is the unique spell that brings him to 
his worshippers on earth. We near the end of 
things. This planet has lived its appointed 
years. All the sins save the supreme one 
have been committed, all the virtues have 
bleached in vain our cowardly souls. Tell me, 
young man, tell me," he grasped Oswald by his 
wrist, "do you long for a sight of the true mas- 
ter ? Through the gates of music will you go 
with me to my heaven where dwells the Only 
One?" 

Invern nodded. He was more curious than 

afraid. With apish agility Van Zorn darted to 

the pianoforte and literally threw his hands 

upon its keyboard. A shrill dissonance in B 

195 



BEDOUINS 

minor sounded; like the lash of hail in his face 
the solitary auditor felt the stormy magnetism 
of the playing. He had sufficient control of his 
critical faculties though it seemed as if he 
were launched into space on the tail of some 
comet to realize the desperate quality of the 
performance. It was not that of a virtuoso; 
rather the travail of a spirit harshly expressing 
itself in a language foreign to its nature. The 
symmetry of the Wagner structure was almost 
destroyed; yet between the bits of broken bars 
and splintered tones there emerged the music of 
some one else, a stranger, newer Wagner. Was 
the Horla of Wagner buried in this demoniacal 
prelude to the second act of Parsifal struggling 
into palpable being! Carried before the ban- 
ners of this surging army of tones, Oswald 
clutched his couch and eagerly listened to the 
evil music of Kundry and Klingsor. 

He saw the stony laboratory with its gloomy 
battlements, from which the necromancer Kling- 
sor witnessed Parsifal defeat the emasculate 
squires. He saw the mystic abyss hidden in 
the haze of violet vapor whence, obeying the 
hoarse summons of her master, Kundry slowly 
emerged. Her scream, the symphonic scream 
of woman, beast, or devil, fell upon his ears as 
though an eternity of damned souls had gnashed 
their teeth. And the echoes of her laughter 
reverberated through the porches of hell. 

Gundryggia dort! Kundry hier! The suc- 
cubus, or she-devil, demon, Rose of Hell, after 
196 



THE SUPREME SIN 

vainly refusing to obey the demands of the 
harsh magician, sank with a baffled cry: "Oh! 
Woe is me!" The vast fabric of Klingsor's 
abode shivered, dissipated into nothingness. 
But there followed no shining garden filled with 
strange and gorgeous flowers, shapes of delights, 
wooing maidens with promises of unearthly love 
on their lips. Vainly Oswald awaited that scene 
of tropical splendor with its dream-terraces, 
living arabesques, and harmonious commingle- 
ment of sky and mountain, earth and fountain, 
the fair mirage painted by Klingsor's dark art. 
It did not appear. Instead the music became 
no longer Wagner's, became no longer music. 
Van Zorn amid brazen thunders wrenched him- 
self from the keyboard, and prostrate upon the 
floor fairly kissed its surface, mumbling an aw- 
ful litany. The room was murky, though violet 
hues suffused the velvet at the end. Invern 
became conscious of a third person, where he 
could not say. An icy vibration like the re- 
mote buzzing of monstrous dynamos apprised 
him that a door or window had been opened in 
the apartment which permitted the entrance of 
-what! His heart beat in the same rhythm 
with the mighty dynamos and the hoarse chant- 
ing of the Count. 

"O Exiled Prince on whom was wrought such wrong I 

Who, conquered, still art impious and strong I" 
"O Satan have mercy on us !" 
"0 Satan, patron saint of evil !" 
"0 Satan take pity on our misery!" 
197 



BEDOUINS 

"0 Prince of Suicide, Maker of music t" 

"0 Satan have pity on us 1" 

"O Father of Pain, King of Desolation, true Master of 

the House of Planets I" 
"0 Satan have mercy on us I" 
"0 Creator of black despair t" 
"O Satan take pity on us I" 

Indifferent Christian as was Invern, his knees 
knocked at this sacrilegious Baudelairian invo- 
cation. The violet grew in intensity as the 
prayers of the blasphemer increased. Slowly 
across the sombre velvet stretched in patibulary 
attitude a human skeleton. No thorns crowned 
its grinning skull; instead a live viper wreathed 
about its bony nest and turned glittering eyes 
upon the two men. Van Zorn's voice became a 
wail, calling down imprecations on earth to 
men of good-will. He cursed life and praised 
death, and his refrain was ever: 

"O Satan? take pity on" our misery I" 

Oswald no longer heard him. With hysterical 
agitation he remarked the transformation of the 
adumbrated phantom. The skeleton had begun 
to carnify its frame was first covered with 
ivory-white flesh, and then, with amazing veloc- 
ity, a woman bourgeoned before his eyes. 
Gone the skull, gone the viper. In their stead 
emerged the delicate head of a goddess fil- 
leted by Easter lilies with smiling lips, en- 
ticing pose, the figure of a delicious nubility. 
Hazel were the wide, gold-flecked eyes that 
198 



THE SUPREME SIN 

shot forthright shafts into the bosom of Oswald, 
and charged him with ineffable longing. The 
arms, exquisite in proportion, the graciously 
modelled torso, pierced him with an epileptic 
ecstasy. And the crazy tones of Van Zorn as- 
sailed his ears as if from a great distance: 

"0 Satan, have mercy on us /" 

But the entranced youth cared little now for 
the diabolic litany. One idea seized and was 
burning up the vital spark of him. As the 
creature waxed in beauty he knew her June 
Tilney ! Yes, it was she or was it the daugh- 
ter of the devil in the Rops picture ? who 
drew him toward her with an irresistible caress 
in her eyes; eyes full of the glamour of Gehenna, 
eyes charged with sins without joy, penitence 
without hope. Forgotten her warnings before 
this Kundry of Golgotha. 

"0 Satan come down to us" rhythmically 
crooned the grovelling old man. 

This, Satan? This radiant maiden with the 
flowery nimbus and beaming eyes, her young 
breasts carolling a magnificat as they pointed 
to the zenith Oswald stumbled to the foot 
of the gibbet, in his ears the throbbing of death. 
Her glance of cadent glory transfixed him. 
Scorched by the vision, some fibre snapped in 
his brain and he triumphantly cried: 

"Thou art a goddess, not the Devil." 

A freezing blast overturned him, the saints of 
199 



BEDOUINS 

hell encircled him, as he heard Van Zorn's 
grinding sobs: 

"Thou hast denied the Devil! Thou hast 
committed the Supreme Sin ! Quickly worship, 
else be banished forever from the only Para- 
dise!" 

Sick, his lips twisting with anguish, Invern 
had sufficient will to close his eyes and despair- 
ingly groan: "Son of Mary, save me!" The 
apparition crumbled. After a panic plunge he 
found himself somehow in the wintry street, his 
forehead wet with fear, his nerves tugging in 
their sheaths like wild animals leashed, his 
heart a cinder in a world of smoke. . . . 

From Asia Minor, years later, the brothers 
received a letter signed by Oswald Invern. In 
it there were misty hints of monastic immure- 
ment, and the hopelessness of expiating a cer- 
tain strange crime, compared with which the 
sin against the Holy Ghost is but a youthful 
peccadillo. The Hollin boys giggled in unison. 

"What joy!" they exclaimed, "to have in- 
vented the Supreme Sin!" 



200 



II 

BROTHERS-IN-LAW 

WITH the vision of an antique marble facade 
lingering in his memory he slowly walked up 
the Avenue, only stopping at Fiftieth Street 
to turn and as leisurely retrace his route. Vin- 
cent Serle was in the middle of his vigorous life, 
but this day, an early one in April, his forces 
seemed arrested; like the curling wave which 
crests before its ultimate recoil and crumble. 
He attributed his mood to the weather. It was 
not precisely spring-fever, but a general slacken- 
ing of physical fibre. He felt almost immoral: 
he desired respite from toil; he longed for some 
place where his eyes would not encounter 
palette or print; and, a versatile man of uncer- 
tain purpose, he longed to write a novel, chiefly 
about himself. 

The clock on the church-tower told him that 
he was farther down-town than he had planned. 
He had mechanically spoken to passing ac- 
quaintances. He had saluted Mrs. Larce, over 
whose portrait he was laboring, with a vacant 
regard and flamboyant hat. Then he emerged 
from his engulfing spleen and hastily ascended 
Delmonico's steps. It was his day of disap- 
pointments. All the windows in the cafe were 
201 



BEDOUINS 

occupied; nothing remained except a large table 
in the centre of the room, decidedly an unpleas- 
ant spot, with people passing and repassing. 
He hesitated and would have gone away when 
he remembered that this hour always saw a 
mob of hungry folk at any establishment. And 
Benedict, his favorite waiter, whispered to him 
that he would assiduously attend to monsieur's 
wants. The bored painter sank heavily into his 
chair. 

The meal was not an enlivening one. Like 
most artists educated in Paris, Vincent never 
took anything save coffee and rolls before one 
o'clock. He was not an early riser; he deplored 
morning work, being lazy and indifferent; but 
he soon discovered that if he were to keep pace 
with the desperate pace of New York artistic 
life he dared not waste the first half of the day. 
Mrs. Larce, for example, insisted upon a ten- 
o'clock sitting. At that precise hour he wished 
himself a writer with liberty to work at mid- 
night; then he might indulge in more tobacco, 
dreams, and later uprisings. In the meantime 
he was munching his fish without noting its 
flavor, a fact that Benedict witnessed with dis- 
appointed eyes. 

He had achieved coffee and cognac and was 
about to light a black cigar when a man hurried 
in, and, after gazing at the coveted window- 
tables, sat himself opposite Serle with a short 
nod, though hardly looking at him. The match 
burned Serle's fingers and he struck a fresh 
202 



BROTHERS-IN-LAW 

one. Instinctively he stood up, searching the 
room for another place. The garc,on asked if 
he desired his account. Vincent shook his 
head and fumingly demanded a newspaper; 
behind it he swallowed his brandy and puffed 
his cigar. The fine print melted into a blurred 
mass before his eyes and his hands trembled. 
He could feel the beating of blood at his wrists 
and temple. He did not peep over the paper 
rampart because of his discomposed features. 

"Damn him!" he thought, "I wonder if he 
knows me yet?" 

The newcomer calmly ate his omelette with 
the air of a man intent upon some problem. He 
was not so tall, so dark as Serle, but older, 
wirier and of a type familiar to Fifth Avenue 
after four o'clock on fine afternoons: a law- 
yer, broker, an insurance officer, but never an 
artist. He did not glance at his table com- 
panion until the other had folded his newspaper, 
and then without a gleam of recognition. 

"He doesn't know me," reflected Serle; "so 
much the better, I'll not go away. I'll watch 
him. It will be interesting." 

He sardonically hoped that the absorbed man 
would choke as he swallowed his chop. Then 
he smiled at his vindictive temper, smiled bit- 
terly because of his childishness after all the 
fellow was not to blame; he had been a mere 
accomplice of a stronger, a more unprincipled 
will. Yet, slowly studying the face, he could 
not call it a foolish one. Its owner showed by 
203 



BEDOUINS 

his concentrated pose, the stern expression of 
his mask, that he was not a weakling. 

"But," mused the painter, "I've seen men 
with jaws as if modelled in granite, eyes that 
imperiously reminded you that they were your 
master, men whose bearing recalled that of a 
triumphant gladiator; well, these same indi- 
viduals, artists, despots, brutes, bankers, were 
like whipped dogs in the presence of some 
woman. No. Hector Marden's outward sem- 
blance is not an indication of the real man. 
We are all consummate actors in our daily 
lives, none more so than those who have much 
to conceal." 

Hector Harden and had he not much to 
conceal the beast! Vincent's clinched fists 
were drumming on the table. " Come," he pon- 
dered, "I'll have to cease this baby game or I'll 
end by making a scene and consequently an 
ass of myself." He stared at Benedict just as 
Marden raised his finger. The waiter hurried 
to the table and presented his memoranda to 
the men. Serle frowned. He was in a nasty 
humor. 

"What's this, Benedict?" He tendered the 
embarrassed gargon his slip of paper. 

"Pardon, a thousand times pardon, monsieur ! 
I made a mistake." Marden looked up smiling. 

"I fear I have the bill intended for you," he 
said, in a conciliating tone. 

"It's nothing," murmured Serle. Both men 
bowed. The accounts were soon settled and 
204 



BROTHERS-IN-LAW 

Benedict nervously retreated to the background. 
But neither one stirred. Vincent, without paus- 
ing to analyze his action, offered Marden the 
newspaper. It was politely refused. Possibly 
because of the mellowness of the moment, or 
the ample repose that follows luncheon, Marden 
was not averse from entering into conversation, 
one of hazy indirectness, equally suggestive and 
non-committal. He made a few commonplace 
remarks about the unseasonable heat, the de- 
plorable twilight of New York's tower-begirt 
highways, and soon, against the prompting of 
his inner spirit, Serle chimed an accordance. 
They chatted. Benedict discreetly moved 
nearer. Presently Serle asked his neighbor if 
he would have a cigar or perhaps a liqueur. 

"I don't mind," rejoined Marden. "The 
fact is I feel lazy this afternoon. I had ex- 
pected to meet a friend here a client of mine 
-but I fancy he is off somewhere wondering 
if New York shall ever boast a decent sky-line. 
He is an architect and enthusiastic over French 
Gothic." Serle's ears began to burn. 

"Architecture in New York? That's a taU 
joke. Curiously enough, though, this very 
morning I was admiring the new library. It 
has a stunning facade. If I were Emperor of 
America I'd raze every building within the 
radius of ten blocks so as to give the building a 
chance. Only think of the Cathedral without 
a house near it!" 

"You are an artist, evidently," Marden said 
205 



BEDOUINS 

without the faintest trace of curiosity in his 
voice. Serle nodded. Benedict with clasped 
hands hinted that the two gentlemen might 
prefer a window. There were empty tables upon 
which the sun no longer shone, since the for- 
midable walls across the street blocked its rays. 
The painter shuddered. They would surely be 
seen by impertinent passers-by. He sent the 
man away, sharply adding that he would be 
called when needed. As for Marden, he was 
languidly drifting on the current of his fancy. 
Was it pleasant or unpleasant? The watcher 
could not decide. But he had made up his 
mind that he would draw Marden up to the 
danger-line, and if discovered, if discovered? 
He would at least tell him what he thought of 
the mean scoundrel who had 

"I've noticed/' Marden broke in on Serle's 
ugly revery, "that painters seem to have lots 
of time on their hands. I beg your pardon. 
You have quite as much reason for advancing 
a similar remark about a professional man. 
Here I am lounging as if I had no office or desk 
loaded with unanswered correspondence. But I 
assure you I don't often dissipate this way, and 
I take it you are of the same opinion regarding 
yourself." He paused. 

"You spoke of painters loafing. What made 
you single out that particular profession? I 
believe it may be called a profession," Vincent 
laughed. 

"Oh! You said you were a painter " 

206 



BROTHERS-IN-LAW 

"Yes, but you were not thinking of me, I'll 
wager. You've only seen me half an hour." 

"You're right; I was not thinking of painters, 
or of you in general, but of a particular case 
that came under my personal observation." 

"Yes, yes," eagerly responded Serle, as he 
mentally abused the lawyer for his measured, 
pedantic delivery. "Your story interests." 

Marden glanced at the other's flaming cheeks 
and replied, rather abruptly: 

"But you haven't heard it yet. However, it's 
not much of a yarn. It happened several 
years ago. A lady, a client, came to me for 
advice. She was married, married, I say, to 
an artist, a painter a big, good-for-nothing 
fellow, who was lazy, who drank, ran after his 
models and spent her money." Marden was 
interrupted. 

"Excuse me, you said the lady was rich?" 

"Did I?" 

"Certainly, spent her money was your last 
phrase." 

"Oh! Well, perhaps I shouldn't have said 
her money. She had no money. I meant that 
her husband had money and didn't spend it on 
her. A mere slip of the tongue." 

"Good. I'm a regular cross-examiner, you 
see." 

"True. You might prove a difficult witness 
in the chair. My friend my client, informed 
me that her husband was so lazy that he re- 
mained in bed until one or two o'clock in the 
207 



BEDOUINS 

afternoon; then he would slowly dress and 
saunter for a walk, and often she did not see 
him until the next morning." 

"How did he make a living?" 

"Oh, I suppose he painted a portrait or two 
and managed to get on." 

"A portrait or two? That would hardly pay 
household expenses that is, unless your friend 
I mean your client's husband, was a Sargent 
or a Boldini. Then they could have struggled 
along at the rate of one portrait every year." 
Serle laughed so harshly that Harden looked at 
him wonderingly. 

"I see you are acquainted with the artistic 
temperament, as they call it in the newspapers," 
observed the lawyer. 

"Not as they call it, but as it is. My 
dear sir, an artist is not built to put in a ton 
of coal every day. A man whose brain is 
delicately adjusted, whose whole soul is in his 
eyes- 

"When he sees a pretty girl?" The sly tone 
of Marden angered the painter. 

"No, hang it! For a painter there are no 
pretty, no ugly girls; no pretty, no ugly land- 
scapes; no agreeable, no disagreeable subjects. 
Only a surface to be transferred to canvas, to 
be truthfully rendered. And that's what busi- 
ness men, with their lack of imagination, will 
never understand." He spoke hotly. 

"I confess I have a lack of imagination when 
it comes to an appreciation of the artistic tem- 
208 



BROTHERS-IN-LAW 

perament." Harden said this so slyly that 
Serle at once begged his pardon. 

"After all, we are not at Dehnonico's just to 
thrash out a stale question. Pray go on your 
story interests me strangely." 

"It's not very interesting that's all I know. 
The woman left the man " 

"For another?" calmly interjected Vincent. 

"Not at all, not at all that is, not at the 
time." The lawyer fumbled his glass, his ex- 
pression overcast. 

"You know what strange creatures women 
are. I had the greatest difficulty in persuading 
my client to make up her mind. She suffered, 
yet she cared for the fellow " 

Serle impatiently asked: "But you haven't 
revealed what the fellow did to her what his 
special crime! Didn't he give her a good 
home?" 

"My dear sir ! A good home when he turned 
night into day ! A good home when he seldom 
put brush to canvas ! A good home why, I 
thought I told you he was too friendly with his 
models." 

"His models! A portraitist ! Do you mean 
his sitters? Did he flirt with them? If he did 
so he was a fool, for he was killing the goose 
that laid the No, I'll not be so impolite. I 
meant to say he would endanger his reputation." 
Marden dryly laughed. 

" That's good reputation is good. My client 
informed me, and she is a serious woman, that 
209 



BEDOUINS 

she never met an artist who could be relied upon. 
And she knew, for she was one herself. " 

Serle's jaw dropped. "How odd ! What did 
she do?" 

"Oh, she painted a little, just enough to make 
pin-money and to annoy her husband. You see, 
it was this way. She did not care to take money 
from a man she loathed." 

"Loathed!" 

" I said loathed. She literally loathed him. 
She told me so." 

"Why didn't she leave him sooner? Besides, 
a few moments ago you said he never offered 
her money. Now, she loathed him so she 
wouldn't take any " 

"Ah! That's not in my fable," tartly an- 
swered Harden. Again he turned gloomy and 
tapped nervously on the table. 

The afternoon waned. A soft light slipped 
through the high curtained windows and modu- 
lated into glancing semitones over the richly 
decorated apartment. Several men entered 
the vanguard of the five-o'clock brigade of ab- 
sintheurs. Serle became nervous. What if ! 
But he determined to take the chance of seeing 
some imbecile who might salute him by name. 
He leaned forward on his folded arms and asked 
with a show of concern: 

"And what became of your charming client?" 

"My charming Oh! Why, she married 
and settled down." 

"At last! Is she happy?" 

210 



BROTHERS-IN-LAW 

"How can I tell?" The response betrayed 
an irritable nuance. 

"I didn't mean to put the question so bluntly. 
The reason I ask is a simple one. I studied a 
case not unlike the one you narrated. It is just 
as sordid and commonplace. My artist, also a 
painter, had married a pupil whom he taught 
as much as she could absorb. She hadn't much 
talent; it was the sort you see expressed on fans 
and bon-bon boxes. 

" She might have been all right if her admiring 
friends had not told her that she had more talent 
than her husband really, there wasn't enough 
between them both to set the river on fire. 
However, she devilled him so effectually that 
he took a separate studio to get away from the 
sound of her voice and from their home. Like 
your painter, he turned day into night, but with 
a difference; he made illustrations for the maga- 
zines and newspapers, painted cheap portraits, 
demeaned himself generally to get money 
enough to run the house. She enjoyed herself, 
flirted, went into society of some sort, a cheap 
compromise between Bohemia and the frayed 
fringe of Fifth Avenue you may not know the 
variety, as you are a member of another profes- 
sion. It is diverting, this society, because it is 
as false as the hair on the head of its women. 
The bohemian side largely consists of bad claret, 
worse music, and ghastly studio teas; its fash- 
ionable side, poverty-stricken grand ladies with 
tarnished reputations. I've seen it all. One of 
211 



BEDOUINS 

the sights of greater Gotham is this glittering 
set of fakirs. The woman I speak of was whirled 
off her feet by the cheap show. She was a fresh, 
pretty little girl when she came here from a 
small town up State. Her friends were ambi- 
tious fools, she was green and very vain. So 
vain! Then her name crept into the newspa- 
pers; it's hard work keeping out of them now- 
adays. She was called 'The beautiful Mrs. 
Somebody, who painted exquisite miniatures of 
socially prominent ladies'; you know the style 
of such rot? The horror of it! Rather you 
don't, for you have never lived in this particular 
set " 

"But, I do, I do!" cried Harden. "My 
client told me something of it." Serle sneered. 

"She didn't tell you much or you might have 
asked her whether there wasn't another side to 
her case. The girl I am talking about went the 
pace; and, as an old philosopher on the police 
force remarks: 'When a woman is heading for 
hell, don't try to stop her; it's a waste of time/ 
Her husband saw it and he did try. Her friends 
knew it and helped her on her merry way. The 
painter even sent her to Europe, and with her 
some of her friends to keep her company, if 
they couldn't keep her straight. Well Paris is 
worse than poison for such women. She was 
soon back in New York, leaving behind her a 
sweet record, many unpaid bills and with a half a 
dozen fools, picked up, God knows where, at her 
heels. And then he went away. It was too 

212 



BROTHERS-IN-LAW 

much. However, being a woman, she won all 
the sympathy. Her story was believed, not his, 
and- 

" Singular coincidence. But wasn't the hus- 
band to blame a little?" 

"Oh!" said Vincent. "Men are always to 
blame." 

"Could he have forgiven her?" 

"He did better, he forgot her." 

"Did she go to the bad?" sympathetically 
inquired Harden. 

"On the contrary. She married well a pro- 
fessional man of some sort." He smiled with 
good-humored malice. 

"And is she is she right now? I mean 
is she happy?" 

"She will be happy always, a selfish little soul. 
You mean is her present husband happy ? " 

"Yes." Marden leaned back nonchalantly 
and his hands, lean-fingered, traversed the cor- 
ner of the table. To Serle the air became as 
dense as a vapor-bath. He continued, merci- 
lessly: 

"Of course he is happy her husband. Why 
shouldn't he be? He doesn't know." 

"Doesn't know what? Really, you set me on 
edge," exclaimed Marden. He tried to smile, 
but his upper lip lifted, displaying white eye- 
teeth. Vincent lighted a fresh cigar. His arm 
did not tremble now. Then, swallowing the last 
of his cold coffee, he continued: 

"Her husband doesn't dream the truth of her 
213 



BEDOUINS 

life in New York and Paris. She is, as I said, 
very pretty and can pull the wool over any man's 
eyes. She is so interesting, so poetic, you know. 
She plays that little trick of the abused wife 
with the artistic temperament; plays it off on 
all the men she meets, on my friends " 

"Your friends?" 

"My friends know her as a capricious vixen, 
masquerading as a delicate oversoul. I knew 
her once." (Serle was cool; he had himself well 
in hand.) "And she always wins and still plays 
the game. At this moment she is probably fool- 
ing her husband, taking tea with some soft- 
head. She gets her wealthy male friends " 

"How does she get them? Tell me." Mar- 
den's voice was subdued. "Does she say to 
her husband that she must secure orders for 
miniatures by dining with rich fellows ? Doesn't 
she " 

" Really, my dear sir, I don't know everything 
about this clever lady's method. You seem 
quite taken with her story. It is, I pride my- 
self, more exciting than your narrative of the 
artistic temperament." Vincent's intonations 
were markedly sarcastic. The older man's face 
was afire. 

"Who the devil " 

Benedict came to the table and placatingly 
asked: 

"Is this Mr. Marden?" 

"I'm Mr. Marden. What do you want?" 

"Madame, your wife, has just arrived. She 
214 



BROTHERS-IN-LAW 

is in the large salon with a gentleman, and she 
desires me to ask you to join her." The men 
arose. 

"It was quite a pleasant afternoon, was it 
not?" In his most charming manner Serle 
put out his hand and Marden took it, grudgingly, 
his shrewd face surly, his little eyes suspiciously 
fastened on the smiling countenance of his com- 
panion. Then he followed the obsequious gar- 
on, and Serle went into the street, first looking 
after the pair. He discerned Marden at a table 
on the Fifth Avenue side; with him was a fresh- 
colored, graceful woman, in elaborate afternoon 
toilette; a big, overdressed man sat beside her. 

Once in a taxi Vincent Serle gave the order 
to cross over to Madison Avenue. 

"I'll not risk passing that window," he mut- 
tered. "It was a mean trick, but it served the 
meddling fool right. I wonder which one of us 
lied the more? And I never saw Amy look so 
bewitching!" 



215 



Ill 

GRINDSTONES 

"Yet each man kills the thing he loves, 

By each let this be heard; 
Some do it with a bitter look, 

Some with a flattering word. 
The coward does it with a kiss, 
The brave man with a sword." 

Oscar Wilde. 

IT was nearly nine o'clock in the evening 
when the young ladies entered the fashionable 
boarding-house drawing-room. Madame Re- 
camier's, on the upper West Side, was large 
enough to defy the heated spell; yet the group 
seemed languid on this tepid night in June, 
fluttered fans and were not disposed to chatter. 
No one had called. Miss Anstruther, a brilliant 
brunette, cried out: 

" Oh, my kingdom for a man ! " Mild laughter 
was heard. The girl went to the grand piano and 
said: "What shall it be?" 

"No Chopin," exclaimed Miss Beeslay. 

"Do play a Chopin nocturne. Why, it's the 
very night for nocturnes. There's thunder in 
the air," protested Miss Pickett. 

"Listen to Anne. Isn't she poetic " 
By this time the young women were quite 
animated. Tea served, Madame Recamier sent 
216 



GRINDSTONES 

down word by the black page to ask Miss An- 
struther for a little music. The dark girl 
pouted, yawned, and finally began the noc- 
turne in F minor. Before she had played two 
bars the door-bell rang, and its echoes were not 
stilled before a silvery gong sounded somewhere 
in the rear. The drawing-room was instantly 
deserted. 

Presently the page brought in two young 
men, both in evening dress. 

"We should like to see Miss Anstruther and 
Miss Pickett," said the delicate-looking fellow. 
"Say that Mr. Harold and a friend are here." 
The page departed. Mr. Harold and his com- 
panion paced the long apartment in a curious 
mood. 

"Tea! They don't drink tea, do they?" 
asked the other man, a tall blond, who wore his 
hair like a pianist. 

"I'm afraid that's all we'll get, Alfred; unless 
Madame Recamier comes down-stairs or else 
is magnetized by your playing. She keeps a 
mighty particular boarding-house." 

"For God's sake, Ned, don't ask me to touch a 
piano. I've only come with you because you've 
raved about this dark girl and her playing. 
There they are!" Two came in; introductions 
followed, and the conversation soon became 
lively. 

"We drink tea," said Anne Pickett, "because 
Madame Recamier believes it is good for the 
complexion." 

217 



BEDOUINS 

"You have a hygiene like a young misses' 
school, haven't you?" said Ned, while Harold, 
fascinated by the rather gloomy beauty of Miss 
Anstruther, watched closely and encouraged her 
talk. She had a square jaw; her cheek-bones 
were prominent. She was not pretty. The 
charm of her face it was more compelling 
than charming lay in her eyes and mouth. 
Brown, with a hazel nuance, the eyes emitted 
a light like a cat's in the dark. Her mouth was 
a contradiction of the jaw. The lips were full 
and indicated a rich, generous nature, but the 
mask was one of a Madonna a Madonna who 
had forsaken heaven for earth. Harold found 
her extremely interesting. 

"Of course, you are musical?" he asked. 

"Yes; I studied at Stuttgart, and have re- 
gretted it all my life. I can never get rid of the 
technical stiffness." 

"Play for me," he begged. But playing was 
not to the girl's disposition. Sultry was the 
night, and a few faint flashes of heat-lightning 
near the horizon told of a storm to come. Anne 
Pickett was laughing very loudly at her com- 
panion's remarks and did not appear to notice 
the pair. Several times, at the other end of 
the long drawing-room, eyes peeped in, and 
once the black page put his head in the door 
and coughed discreetly. 

It seemed a dull hour at Madame Recamier's. 

Suddenly Harold placed his hand on Miss 
Anstruther's and said: "Come to the piano," 
218 



GRINDSTONES 

and, as one hypnotized, she went with him. He 
lifted the fall-board, put back the lid, glanced 
carelessly at the maker's name, and fixed the 
seat for the young woman. Anne Pickett was 
watching him from the other side of the room. 

" Who's your friend? He acts like a piano 
man. There were three here last night." 

"H'sh!" said Ned, as the pianist struck a 
firm chord in C-sharp minor and then raced 
through the Fantaisie-Impromptu. The man 
beside her listened and watched rather cynically 
as her strong fingers unlaced the involved fig- 
ures of the music. That he knew the work was 
evident. When she had finished he congratu- 
lated her on her touch, observing: "What a pity 
you don't cultivate your rhythms!' 7 She 
started. 

"You are a musician, then?" Before he 
could answer, the page came in and whispered 
in her ear: "Madame Recamier wants to know 
if the gentlemen will have some wine." 

Miss Anstruther blushed, got up from the 
piano and walked toward the window. Harold 
followed her, and Miss Pickett called out: 
"Ned, we can have some champagne; old 
Mumsey says so." 

When Harold reached the girl she was lean- 
ing out of the window regarding the western 
sky. Darkness was swallowing up the summer 
stars: he put his hand on her shoulder, for she 
was weeping silently, hopelessly. 

"How can you stand it?" he murmured, and 
219 



BEDOUINS 

the ring in his voice caused the girl to turn 
about and face him, her eyes blurred but full 
of resentment. 

"Don't pity me don't pity me; whatever 
you feel, don't pity me," she said in a low, 
choked voice. 

"My dear Miss Anstruther, let me under- 
stand you. I admire you, but I don't see why 
I should pity you." Harold was puzzled. 

"Anne, he doesn't know; Harold doesn't 
know," cried Miss Anstruther, and Anne 
laughed, when a sharp flash of lightning al- 
most caused the page to drop the tray with the 
bottles and glasses. 

It grew hot; the wine was nicely iced, so the 
four young people drank and were greatly re- 
freshed. Madame Recamier was justly proud 
of her cellar. Anne pledged Ned, and Harold 
touched glasses with Miss Anstruther, while the 
first thunder boomed in the windows, and the 
other boarders out in the back conservatory 
shivered and thirsted. 

Harold went to the piano. He felt wrought 
up in a singular manner. The electricity in the 
atmosphere, the spell of the dark woman's sad 
eyes, her harsh reproof and her undoubted 
musical temperament acted on him like a whip- 
lash. He called the page and rambled over the 
keyboard. Miss Anstruther sat near the pian- 
ist. Soon the vague modulations resolved into 
a definite shape, and the march from the Fan- 
taisie in F minor was heard. It took form, it 
220 



GRINDSTONES 

leaped into rhythmical life, and when the rolling 
arpeggios were reached, a crash over the house 
caused Miss Pickett to scream, and then the 
page entered with a tray. 

Harold stopped playing. Miss Anstruther, 
her low, broad brow dark with resentment, said 
something to the boy, who showed his gums and 
grinned. "It's de wine, missy," he said, and 
went out on ostentatious tiptoe. The group in 
the conservatory watched the comedy in the 
drawing-room with unrelaxed interest, though 
little Miss Belt declared the thunder made her 
so nervous that she was going to bed. Madame 
Recamier rang the gong twice, and a few min- 
utes later a smell of cooking mounted from 
the area kitchen. Harold started afresh. The 
storm without modulated clamorously into the 
distance, and orange-colored lightning played 
in at the window as he reached the big theme 
of the bass. It was that wonderful mel- 
ody in F minor which Beethoven might have 
been proud to pen, and was followed by the 
exquisite group of double notes, so fragrant, so 
tender, so uplifting, that Anne Pickett forgot 
her wine; and the other girl, her eyes blazing, 
her cheek-bones etched against the skin, sat 
and knotted her ringers and followed with dazed 
attention the dance of the atoms in her brain. 
She saw Harold watching her as she went to 
school; Harold peeping in at the lodge of her 
college; Harold waiting to waylay her when 
she left her father's house, and she saw Harold 
221 



BEDOUINS 

that terrible night ! He had reached the medi- 
tation in B and her pulses slackened. After 
the crash of the storm, after the breathless rush 
of octaves, Miss Anstruther felt a stillness that 
did not come often into her life. The other 
pair were sitting very close, and the storm was 
growling a diminuendo in the east. Already a 
pungent and refreshing smell of earth that had 
been rained upon floated into the apartment, 
and Harold, his eyes fixed on hers, was rushing 
away with her soul on the broad torrent of 
Chopin's magic music. She was enthralled, she 
was hurt; her heart stuck against her ribs and 
it pained her to breathe. When the last harp- 
like figure had flattened her to the very wall, 
she sank back in her chair and closed her eyes. 

"Ho, Margery, wake up; your wine's getting 
warm !" cried lively Anne Pickett as she sipped 
her glass, and Ned rang the bell for the page. 
Harold sat self-absorbed, his hands resting on 
the ivory keys. He divined that he had won 
the soul of the woman who sat near him, and 
he wondered. He looked at her face, a strong 
face, in repose with a few hard lines about 
the eyes and mouth. He gazed so earnestly 
that she opened her eyes, and catching his re- 
gard, blushed blushed ever so lightly. But 
he saw it and wondered again. More wine 
came, but Miss Anstruther refused and so did 
Harold. By this time the other pair were jolly. 
Ned called out: 

"Harold, play something lively. Wake up 
222 



GRINDSTONES 

the bones, old man! Your girl isn't getting 
gay." Harold looked at her, and she walked 
slowly toward the conservatory. Miss Pickett, 
crazy Anne, as they called her, went to the 
piano and dashed into a lively galop. Ned 
drank another glass of wine and began to dance 
from the end of the room to the piano. 

"Come on, let's have a good racket!" he 
yelled, as the piano rattled off in rag-time while 
Miss Anstruther and Harold sat on near the 
conservatory. The whispering increased behind 
them, but the girl did not hear it. The music 
unlocked her heart, and her commonplace sur- 
roundings faded. If she had but met a man like 
him that other time! She realized his innate 
purity, his nobility of nature. Little wonder 
that his playing aroused her, made live anew 
the old pantomime of her life. She unconsciously 
placed in the foreground of her history the fig- 
ure of the man beside her, yet she had never 
before seen him. It was wonderful, this spirit- 
ual rebirth. Only that morning she told the 
girls at breakfast she could never love again 
she hated men and their ways. "They are ani- 
mals, the best of them!" and Madame Re- 
camier laughed the loudest. 

Harold left her, took another glass of wine, 
and seeing Miss Pickett light a cigarette, asked 
permission to do the same. 

"Can't I bring you another glass of wine?" 
Harold tenderly asked. The gang of girls in 
the conservatory nudged one another and stared 
223 



BEDOUINS 

with burning eyes at Miss Anstruther through 
the lattice. She gently shook her head, and 
again he saw her blush. She did not stir. He 
began the luscious nocturne in B the Tube- 
rose Nocturne, and Madame Recamier's gong 
sounded. The page entered and said: 

"No more piano playing to-night. Madame 
wants to sleep." 

Miss Anstruther started so angrily that there 
was a titter behind the lattice. But she did not 
notice it; her whole soul was bent on watching 
Harold. He spoke to Ned, and Miss Pickett's 
jarring laugh was heard. 

Then he went over to her, and, sitting down 
beside her, leaned and touched her face with 
his finger. The girl grew white and she felt her 
heart beat. At the next word, the old, tired, 
cold look came back, and she faced him as she 
had first received him. 

Then suddenly the laughter behind the lat- 
tice grew noisy. Anne Pickett screamed out: 

"Another of Margery's dreams shattered!" 

Ned laughed and rang for more wine. 

As they came down the steps the next morn- 
ing Harold said to Ned: 

"My boy, there are worse crimes than mur- 
dering a woman." 

"Oh, let's get a cocktail," croaked Ned. 



224 



IV 
VENUS OR VALKYR ? 

PAUL GODARD found the ride between Nu- 
remberg and Baireuth discomforting. The hot 
July breezes that blew into the first-class coupe 
of the train were almost breath-arresting; and 
Paul had left Stuttgart that morning in a savage 
mood. The slowness of the railway service ir- 
ritated him, the faces of his travelling compan- 
ions irritated him, and he had shocked an Eng- 
lishman by remarking early in the afternoon: 

"If the old engine doesn't run any faster 
than this we had better get out and walk, or 
push." 

The other simply peered at the speaker and 
then resumed Wolzogen's book on Leading- 
Motives. 

Three Roumanian ladies laughed in oily 
Eastern accents. They understood English, 
and the sight of a human being, a strong young 
man, in a passion about such a little matter as 
European railroad punctuality struck them as 
ridiculous. So they laughed again and Paul 
finally joined in, for he was an American. 

He had been rude, but he couldn't help it; 
besides, it looked as if they would reach Bai- 
225 



BEDOUINS 

reuth too late for the opening performance, and 
his was the laughter of despair. 

The youthful pilgrim journeying to Bai- 
reuth was born in New York. He had studied 
music like most young people in his country, 
and had begun with that camel, that musical 
beast of all burdens, the piano. This he prac- 
tised most assiduously at intervals, because he 
really loved music; but college, lawn- tennis, 
golfing, dancing, and motor-boating had claims 
not easily put aside. Naturally, the piano suf- 
fered until Paul left college; then for want of 
something better to do he took lessons from 
Joseffy and edified that master by his spurts of 
industry. His club began to encroach on his 
attention, and again the piano was forgotten. 
Paul, whose parents were rich, was not a society 
butterfly, but his training, instincts, and asso- 
ciations forced him to regard a good dinner, a 
good tailor, and a racing motor-car as necessary 
to his existence. From his mother he inherited 
his love of music, and his father, dead many 
years, had bequeathed him a library; better 
still, a taste for reading. 

An average cultivated American, intensely 
self-conscious, too self-conscious to show him- 
self at his best, ashamed of his finer emotions, 
like most of his countrymen, and a trifle spoiled 
and shallow. 

One day Edgar Saltus told Paul he should 
read Schopenhauer, and he at once ordered the 
two volumes of The World as Will and Rep- 
226 



VENUS OR VALKYR? 

resentation. It was not difficult reading, be- 
cause he had been in Professor Bowne's class at 
college and enjoyed the cracking of meta- 
physical nuts. He began to get side glimpses 
of Wagner's philosophy, but despite the wit of 
the German Diogenes his pessimism repelled 
him. He could not agree with Saltus's ingenious 
defense of pessimism in his two early books, and 
he looked about for diversion elsewhere. Walter 
Pater's silken chords, velvety verbal music, 
had seduced Paul from the astringencies of 
Herbert Spencer, and Chopin made moonlight 
for his soul on morbid nights. 

Yet Paul, with his selfish, well-bred, easy life, 
had encountered no soul-racking convulsions; 
he had never been in love, therefore he played 
the nocturnes of Chopin in a very unconvinc- 
ing manner. 

He always declared that Poe was bilious, and 
this remark gained for him the reputation of 
wit and scholar among his club associates. 

The Calumel Club is not given to velleites of 
speech. . . . 

n 

Then Paul Godard fell into the clutches of 
Richard Wagner and swallowed much of him. 

Chopin seemed tiny, exotic, and feminine 
compared to the sirocco blasts of the Baireuth 
master. Paul was not too critical, and, like 
most Americans, he measured music by its im- 
mediate emotional result. The greater the as- 
227 



BEDOUINS 

sault upon the senses, the greater the music. 
The logic was inescapable. 

Friedrich Nietzsche was the next milestone in 
Paul's mental journeyings. The attack on Wag- 
ner, the attack on the morals that made our 
state stable, the savage irony, sparkling wit, and 
brilliant onslaught on all the idols, filled the 
mind of the young man with joy. He dearly 
loved a row, and though he recognized Nordau's 
borrowed polemical plumage, he liked him be- 
cause of his cockiness. 

So he devoured Nietzsche, reckless of his 
logical inferences, reckless of the feelings of his 
poor mother, a most devoted Episcopalian of 
the High Church variety. Paul always pained 
her with his sudden somersaults, his amazing 
change of attitude, and, above all, his heartless 
contempt for her idols, the Church and good 
society. Society sufficed her soul hunger, and 
Paul's renunciation of Mozart and Donizetti 
she simply loved Lucia his sarcastic flouting 
of churchgoers and his refusal to range himself, 
were additional weeds of woe in her mourning 
life. 

There was Edith Vicker; but Paul was such a 
hopeless case and wouldn't see that a nice, pretty, 
rich, moderately intelligent, well-reared young 
woman was slipping through his fingers. Mrs. 
Godard often sighed that winter in her sump- 
tuous uptown apartment. 

Nietzsche revealed new intellectual vistas for 
Paul and he actually became serious. The 
228 



VENUS OR VALKYR? 

notion of regarding one's own personality as a 
possible work of art to be labored upon and 
polished to perfection's point, set him thinking 
hard. What had he done with his life? What 
wasted opportunities ! He deserted his club 
and began piano-playing again, and when re- 
proached by his friends for his fickleness he 
excused himself by quoting Nietzsche; a thinker, 
as well as a snake, must shed his skin once a 
year, else death. He also was ready with Emer- 
son's phrase about fools being consistent, and 
felt altogether very fine, and superior to his 
fellow-beings. Nietzsche feeds the flame of 
one's vanity, and Paul was sure that he belonged 
to the quintessential band of elect souls that is 
making for the Uebermensch the Superman ! 
He really was a nice, boyish lad, and he could 
never pass a pretty girl whether a countess or 
a chambermaid without making soft eyes at 
her. Paul was popular; and so the Roumanian 
ladies laughed at him admiringly. Paul had 
left his mother in Paris, the heat was too trying 
for travel, and he was close to Baireuth on this 
torrid summer day, one Sunday afternoon in 

July- 

Yet another hour before him, he turned his 
critical attention to the laughing trio. One was 
a princess. She told Paul so, and spoke of the 
sultry diversions of Bucharest. The second was 
a fat singer, who startled the Englishman by 
inquiring if there wasn't a good coloratura part 
in Parsifal. If there were, she intended asking 
229 



BEDOUINS 

Frau Cosima Wagner to let her sing it; but if 
there wasn't, she supposed she would have to 
be content with the Forest Bird; even Melba 
had been a Waldvogel, why couldn't she be one 
also? 

Her sparkling eyes and mountain of flesh 
amused Paul exceedingly. He knew Heinrich 
Conried very well, and he told the singer that 
when Parsifal was sung next season at the Met- 
ropolitan Opera House he would speak to the 
impresario and get her the part of Kundry. It 
was for a lark-like voice, such as the lady said 
she possessed, and full of Bellinian fioritura. 

As he gravely related these fables he was con- 
scious of the penetrating gaze of the third 
woman. She was tall, frail-looking, with a dark 
skin, hair black and glossy, and she had the 
most melancholy eyes in the world. Paul re- 
turned her glance with discretion. His eyes 
were Irish blue-gray and full of the devil at 
times, and they could be very sympathetic and 
melting when he willed. The two young people 
examined each other with that calm regard 
which, as Schopenhauer declares, mars or makes 
the destiny of a new generation. But metaphys- 
ics and the biology of the sexes bothered not at 
all the youth and maiden. Paul admired the 
classic regularity of her nose and forehead, and 
wondered why her face seemed familiar. Her 
mouth was large, irregular, perverse. It sug- 
gested Marie Bashkir tseff's, and it was just as 
yearning and dissatisfied. Despite their sadness, 
230 



VENUS OR VALKYR? 

fun lurked in the corners of her eyes, and he 
knew that she enjoyed his harmless hoax. 

Then they both burst out laughing, and the 
princess said in a surprised voice: 

"Helena, why do you laugh with the young 
American gentleman?" 

She also mentioned a family name that caused 
the New Yorker to stare. What, was this girl 
with the determined chin and brows the identical 
one who almost set Russia quarrelling with an- 
other nation and upset the peace of Roumania? 
Yes, it was, and Paul no longer puzzled over her 
face. It had been common property of the 
photographers and newspaper illustrators a few 
years ago, and as he mentally indexed its features 
he almost said aloud that her curious beauty 
had never been even faintly reproduced. 

His imagination was stirred; Roumania had 
always seemed so remote, and here was he, Paul 
Godard, a plain American citizen, face to face 
with the heroine of one of those mysterious 
Eastern intrigues in which kings, crowns, queens, 
and ladies-in-waiting were all delightfully mixed 
up. So he chatted with Helena about Wagner 
and Degeneracy, and discovered that she was 
an admirer of Ludwig of Bavaria, Nietzsche, 
Guy de Maupassant, Poe, Schumann, Chopin, 
Marie Bashkirtseff, and all the rest of the sick- 
brained people born during the sick-brained 
nineteenth century. She, too, had written a 
book, which was soon to appear. It was full of 
the Weltzchmerz of Schopenhauer and the bold 
231 



BEDOUINS 

upspringing individualism of Nietzsche. She had 
odd theories concerning the Ring of the Nibe- 
lungs, and had read Browning's Sordello. She 
told Paul that she found but one stumbling-block 
in Wagner. How, she asked gravely, with a 
slight blush how could Parsifal become Lohen- 
grin's father? 

Paul said he didn't know. It must have oc- 
curred long after his experiences with Kundry 
and the Flower Girls, and perhaps it was a sort 
of 

"Oh, no, M. Godard !" she quickly answered. 
"Not that. The swan died, you know; besides, 
Parsifal was always a Pure Fool." Paul sug- 
gested that it might have been another of the 
same name but of a different family. And then 
the conversation went to pieces, for the soprano 
called out: 

"Voila! Baireuth, the Wagner theatre!" 
and they all craned their necks to catch the first 
glimpse of that mystic edifice built on the hill, 
the new musical Pantheon, the new St. Peter's 
of the Bewitched Ones. 

And the Englishman continued to calmly read 
about the Loki-motif as the train slowly steamed 
into Baireuth. 

m 

Paul found comfortable lodgings in the Liszt- 

strasse and his new friends went to the Hotel 

Sonne. At half-past four he was up on the hill 

looking at the world, and as immaculately dressed 

232 



VENUS OR VALKYR? 

as if he stood in the bow window of the Calumel 
Club, ogling Fifth Avenue girls. He was only 
vaguely interested in the approaching perform- 
ance, and his pulses did not quicken when Don- 
ner's motif told the gabbling, eager throng that 
the great Trilogy was about to unfold its fables 
of water, wood, and wind. He took his seat 
unconcernedly, and then the house became 
black and from space welled up those elemental 
sounds, not merely music, but the sighing, dron- 
ing swish of waters. The Rhine calmly, majes- 
tically stole over Paul's senses, he forgot New 
York, and when the curtains parted he was with 
the Rhine Daughters, with Alberich, and his 
heart seemed to stop beating. All sense of 
identity vanished at a wave of Wagner's magic 
wand, and not being a music-critic, his ego was 
absorbed as by the shuiing mirror in the hand 
of a hypnotist. This, then, was Wagner, a 
Wagner who attacked simultaneously all the 
senses, vanquished the strongest brain, smoth- 
ered, bruised, and smashed it; wept, sang, surged, 
roared, sighed in it; searched and ravished your 
soul until it was put to flight, routed, vanquished, 
and brought bleeding and captive to the feet 
of the master. 

The eye was promise-crammed, the ears sealed 
with bliss, and Paul felt the wet of the waters. 
He panted as Alberich scaled the slimy steeps, 
and the curves, described by the three swimming 
mermaids, filled him with the joy of the dance. 

The rape of the Rhinegold, the hoarse shout 
233 



BEDOUINS 

of laughter from Alberich's love-forsworn lips, 
and the terrified cries of the three watchers were 
to Paul as real as Wall Street. 

Walhall didn't bore him, and he began at last 
to catch faint clues of the meaning of the mighty 
epic. He went to the underworld, and saw the 
snake, the ring, and the tarnhelm; he heard the 
anvil chorus so different from Verdi's ! he 
saw the giants quarrelling over their booty, and 
the rainbow seemed to bridge the way to an- 
other, brighter world. As the Walhall march 
died in Paul's ears he found himself in the open 
air, and he thought it all over as he slowly went 
with the crowd down the hill, that new Mount 
of Olives trod by the feet of musical martyrs. 
He had a programme, but he was too confused, 
too overcome by the clangor of his brain-parti- 
cles, to read it. He was not dreaming, nor yet 
was he awake; he was Wagnerized. The first 
attack is not always fatal, but it is always 
severe, even to the point of pain. Paul God- 
ard had become a Wagnerite, and his Nietzsche 
and Schopenhauer skins melted from him as 
melts the snow in sunshine. 

Striking through his many exalted moods was 
the consciousness of having recognized one of 
the Rhine Daughters. It was the contralto, an 
Eastern girl from Maine. Rue Towne was her 
odd name, and she had been once a pupil of a 
New England vocal school, but she had lived 
that down, and after the usual hard, interest- 
ing struggle abroad she had reached Baireuth. 
234 



VENUS OR VALKYR? 

Paul remembered her well. A blonde girl, eyes 
indescribably gray, with dark lashes, a face full 
of interesting accents, a rhythmic chin and cheek- 
bones that told of resolution. Her figure was 
lovely, and Paul resolved to call on her the very 
next day. 

He soon discovered Rue's address; Baireuth 
is small and full of information for the curious. 
Paul on Monday morning went to the Alexan- 
derstrasse, where she resided, only to find her 
at a rehearsal of Die Walkiire. He was rather 
put out, as he was accustomed to accomplish 
what he wanted without much exertion. He 
then bethought him of Helena, the Roumanian 
beauty, and he warmed at the recollection of a 
glance he had received the afternoon previous. 
That, and the hand pressure, had been unmistak- 
able. So he went to the Sonne Hotel and sent 
up his card. The three ladies were at breakfast. 
Would Mr. Godard call in an hour ? 

Paul cursed his luck and walked to Wahn- 
fried, wondering if he was to be bored during 
his stay. The reaction from the exalted condi- 
tion after Rhinegold had set in. Paul was not 
a beer-drinker, so he could not avail himself of 
the consolations offered by Gambrinus, the 
Drowsy Deity of Germany. He had taken a 
pint of bad champagne and some tough chicken 
and slept badly. His cigar, too, was abomina- 
ble, and he felt absolutely disillusioned as he 
paced the historic garden of Wahnfried. The 
true Wagnerite is always in heaven or hades. 
235 



BEDOUINS 

There is no middle-distance in his picture of life 
and art. At Wagner's grave Paul felt a return 
of the thrill, but it passed away at the barking 
of a boarhound. He went slowly toward the 
hotel and was in such a perverse mood that he 
avoided it and turned into the Ludwigstrasse. 
Then he met some one. 

A girl passed him, gave him a shy, half- 
startled glance, hesitated, and spoke to him. It 
was Rue Towne. 

"Mr. Gpdard, I found your card a moment 
ago. I am very glad to see you. How did you 
likeRhinegold?" 

Paul was standing in the street, the girl look- 
ing down into his eyes; he made a conventional 
answer, their hands touched, and they went 
down the street together. 

That afternoon Paul received a pretty note 
from the Roumanian. She wrote of her sorrow 
at his not having called again, and asked him to 
join them during the first entr'acte of Die Wal- 
kiire. He tossed the note away, for his brain was 
filled with the vision of a girl in a straight- 
brimmed straw hat, a girl with a voice like a woo- 
ing clarinet and eyes that were dewy with desire. 
Paul was hard hit, and, as one nail drives out 
another, the blonde woman supplanted the bru- 
nette in his easily stirred imagination. 

The first act of Die Walkiire did not lay the fair 

ghost in his brain; he went out on the esplanade 

and encountered the three Roumanians. Helena 

detached herself and came to him with that 

236 



VENUS OR VALKYR? 

gracious gait and proud lift of head and throat 
that gave her a touch of royalty. She re- 
proached him with her magnetic gaze, and soon 
the pair were strolling in the leafy lanes about 
the theatre. 

Paul had never met a woman who mentally 
tantalized him as did Helena. She had a man- 
ner of half uttering a sentence, of putting a 
nuance into her question that interested while it 
irritated him. Artistic people are mutually at- 
tracted, and there was a savor in the personality 
of this distinguished girl that was infinitely en- 
ticing to his cultivated taste and at the same 
time slightly enigmatic. Without effort they 
glided into confidences, and the Sword-motive 
sounding for the second act found them old 
friends. Youth is not the time for halting com- 
promise. 

Lilli Lehmann's art took Paul out of himself, 
and the beauty and vigor of the act stirred him 
again. But he could not recapture the first fine, 
careless rapture of the night before. To the 
nerves, virginal of Wagner, that thrill comes once 
only. 

In the long intermission Paul found Helena 
and took her to the crowded cafe across the road 
to get something to eat and drink. It was a 
quarter after seven, and Wagner wears on the 
stomach. Even a poetical Roumanian girl has 
earthly appetites. So they drank champagne 
and ate pasties of goose liver, and confessions 
were many. Nothing establishes a strong bond 
237 



BEDOUINS 

of sympathy like the hunger and thirst of two 
healthy young humans. Paul seemed to have 
forgotten Rue and the splendour of her hair and 
complexion. He was rapidly losing his head in 
the subtle blandishments of the Eastern woman. 
He saw that she was a coquette, but her serious- 
ness, her fierceness, that broke through the shell 
of silky manners, gave him a glimpse of a woman 
worth winning, and he was just gambler enough, 
American enough to dare. When he left her he 
carried away a look that was an unequivocal 
challenge. 

Paul's brain was on fire during the Ride of 
the Valkyries, and hardly realized that it was 
Hans Richter's masterly reading. The stage 
failed to interest him until he discovered Rue 
in Valkyrean garb, and then he watched with 
his soul in his eyes. Her profile, so charming in 
its irregularity; her freedom of pose, her heroic 
action filled him with admiration. By the light 
from the stage he read her name, Fraulein Rue 
Towne, and she was the last in the list of the 
Valkyries. He watched with indifferent gaze the 
close of the act, and mentally voted the Paris 
version of the Magic-Fire scene far superior to 
Baireuth's. 

He went toward the Hotel Sonne, as he had 
promised to sup with Helena, and wondered how 
he could see Rue that night. The American girl 
seemed something infinitely sweet, healthy, sun- 
swept in nature compared with her Slavic rival. 

"By Jove," said Paul aloud, "it's a case of 
238 



VENUS OR VALKYR? 

rouge et noir, and I'm in for it and no mistake." 
Paul was fond of polyphony. 

IV 

After supper he suggested to Helena the Sam- 
met Garden. The artists always flocked there 
and it might prove interesting. Although a 
chaperon was a necessity, Helena persuaded the 
princess that she could go out just once in the 
American fashion. It would be so novel. Paul 
pleaded and, of course, won. The young people 
hardly spoke as they went down the dark street 
to the garden. The air was full of electricity. 
A touch, a glance, and a storm would be pre- 
cipitated. So they reached the garden and 
found a seat near enough the house to be tor- 
tured by Herr Sammet's crazy trombone. At 
the same table was a black-bearded little man 
dressed in white flannels. 

"It is the Sar Peladan; I know him by his 
musk," said Helena discontentedly, and they 
changed their seats. 

"What a decadent you are!" said Godard 
laughingly. 

"Yes. I believe sometimes I can think with 
my nose, my smelling sense is so keen. I can 
almost divine approaching enemies. Who is 
that girl staring at you so hard, M. Godard, a 
very pretty blonde; she looks like an American? 
No, not near the house there, over there!" 
Helena reminded Paul of a cat that lifts a threat- 
239 



BEDOUINS 

ening furry back when she scents a hostile 
dog. 

"Oh, Lord !" he groaned. "It must be Rue. 
That settles me for good." It was Rue, and 
she had never looked lovelier. The slight bruise 
under her eyes betokened emotional exhaustion. 
She was dressed in white, and the simplicity of 
her gown and its charming fit made the German 
women plainer. Paul's heart knocked against 
his ribs as he returned her constrained bow. He 
saw that she had quietly and earnestly examined 
Helena, and as the eyes of the women met an- 
tagonism kindled. But the American girl was 
mistress of herself. She began to talk to the 
group of artists about her, while Helena sulked 
and glowered at Paul's too openly expressed 
admiration. 

"You admire your own countrywomen, do 
you not, M. Godard?" she asked, and the in- 
flection in her voice was cruelly sarcastic. Be- 
fore Paul could answer she touched his arm softly 
and said: 

"If you can't look at me when I talk to you, 
why, you may take me home." 

Paul at once begged her pardon, called for 
his reckoning and they prepared to leave the 
garden. He did not again salute Rue Towne, 
for she was talking earnestly to an ugly old fat 
man with a grey beard and a Wagnerian fore- 
head half a foot high. But from the tail of his 
eye he saw that she was fully conscious of his 
departure. Scarlet spots came into her face, and 
240 



VENUS OR VALKYR? 

as Paul walked down the garden steps he felt 
as if two eyes burned into his back. Then he 
did what other desperate men have done under 
similar circumstances. He made violent love to 
Helena, and it relieved the pain of his heart. 
But the girl was capricious, and only by dint of 
magnificent lying did he finally force her hand 
into his. They were now walking toward the 
Hofgarten, down a deserted street. The many 
bells of 'Baireuth told them that it was a 
quarter past eleven, and the moon rode tenderly 
in the blue. It was a night made for soft vows 
and kisses, and as Paul walked he thought of 
Rue; Helena fell to dreaming of the prince in 
her native Roumania who had played the weak- 
ling to her strong woman's heart, and thus the 
pair reached the hotel, and after a brief parley 
at its door said good night and parted. 

O blessed love, that can at least console two 
hearts glowing for the absent ! 

Paul awoke next morning with what the hard- 
headed Germans call a moral headache. He 
had a bad taste in his conscience, and he decided 
to call as soon as possible on Rue. It was 
nearly eleven before he got to her house. As 
she had no rehearsal for Siegfried, she received 
him. He thought that she was distant, but he 
talked fast and earnestly, and soon the ice 
began to thaw. Paul felt happy. Helena ap- 
pealed to his decadent taste, but Rue was as 
the perfume of the morning. He told her so, 
and explained at great length and with consid- 
241 



BEDOUINS 

erable ingenuity how he came in the company 
of a lone young woman. Her two chaperons 
Paul fancied two sounded more imposing had 
gone by mistake to the garden of the Sonne 
Hotel; that is why he left so soon with the lady, 
who was only a recent acquaintance. 

He felt Rue's eyes on him as he wove this 
roundelay, and, feeling hot about the neck and 
a little fearful of his ability to keep up the 
strain much longer, he suddenly grasped the 
girl, crying out, and most sincerely: 

"0 Rue ! why do we waste time talking about 
a woman I never cared for and never expect to 
see again. I love you, I love you, my darling ! 
Kiss me just once and tell me you care a little 
for me." 

As he fell upon her she was taken off her 
guard, and the inevitable happened. She kissed 
Paul and he placed a big ring on her finger, and 
left the house an hour later an engaged and also 
a much be-perjured man. He was happy until 
he thought of Helena. 

That evening when Siegfried was finished 
Paul walked arm and arm with Rue down the 
hill to Sammet's. As they entered they brushed 
against three ladies, and Paul said aloud: "Oh, 
Lord!" 

The next day Rue had to go to a rehearsal for 
the Rhine Daughters in Die Gotterdammerung, 
and Paul was whistling the Spring Song from 
Die Walkure in his room when a knock at his 
door brought the news that a lady wished to 
242 



VENUS OR VALKYR? 

see him. He wondered who the lady was, and, 
as the parlor of the house had been turned into 
a bedroom, he put on his hat and went into the 
hall, to be confronted by Helena, shamefaced 
but resolute. 

"Come out into the street," he begged, for in 
her implacable eyes he read signs of the ap- 
proaching storm. 

They silently descended to a lower 6tage. 
Then she turned and faced him: 

"So you didn't come to me this morning/' 
she said. Roumania excited was a stirring spec- 
tacle, nevertheless Paul wished that he was up 
the Hudson playing golf. 

He endeavored to placate her. Helena, an- 
gered at her loss of dignity in condescending 
to call on this man, reproached him bitterly, 
and it seemed to him that she was about to sing 
the picturesque songs of hate which Carmen 
Sylva has made known to us, when they reached 
the street. Then her rage vanished in a moment. 

"You conceited man, and you really took me 
in solemn earnest! I fancied the Americans 
had a sense of humor. Pooh! You're not a 
man to love more than a moment, anyhow," 
and she went on her way laughing mockingly, 
leaving Paul shamefaced, angered, his self-love 
all bruised and his senses aroused, for Helena 
wrathful was more beautiful than Helena ami- 
able. 

He was so distressed in mind that he only sat 
through one act of Die Gotterdammerung; his 
243 



BEDOUINS 

Wagner madness seemed to have evaporated. 
He hovered around the back of the theatre, and 
caught a glimpse of Rue getting in a carriage 
with the same fat old German her singing- 
teacher, he fancied. 

Although it was late, he called at her house. 
She had not yet arrived, the maid told him. 
He mooned about disconsolately until one 
o'clock, keeping at a safe distance from the 
Hotel Sonne. Then he wearily went to bed 
and dreamed that the Nornes were chasing him 
down Fifth Avenue. 

The next morning he called again on Rue. She 
sent down word that she was tired. He called 
again in the afternoon; she was not at home. 
In the evening, feeling as if he were going mad, 
he was told that she had gone out and would 
not be back until late. He hung around the 
house in a hungry-dog fashion, smiling bitterly 
at times and beginning to doubt even his own 
intentions. But no Rue. 

He went home at last, and in a rage of love 
and jealousy he sat down and wrote to Rue this 
letter: 

"Rue, my Rue, darling, what is the matter? 
Have I offended you? Why did you not see 
me to-day, to-night? Oh, how lonely was the 
street, how sad my heart! I thought of Ver- 
laine's 'It rains in my heart as it rains in the 
town.' Why don't you see me? You are mine; 
you swore it. My sweet girl, whose heart is as 
fragrant as new-mown hay ! Darling, you must 
244 



VENUS OR VALKYR? 

see me to-morrow to-day for I am writing 
to you in the early, early morning. You know 
that you promised to come to me next year in 
America. Only think, sweetheart, what joy 
then ! The sky is aflame with love. We walk 
slowly under few soft spring stars, and your 
hand is in mine, and that night, that night your 
heart will sob on my breast, my lovely woman, 
and your heart will fiercely beat as we both slip 
over the hills to heaven. Rue, you will make 
me a poet. Only tell me, I beg of you, the 
hour when I may see you." 

Then Paul threw himself on the bed, but not 
to sleep. It was daybreak, and the Teutonic 
chanticleer of the dawn had lusty lungs, and it 
was almost time for coffee. He dressed in fever- 
ish haste, went out of doors, secured a messenger 
and despatched the letter. He walked up and 
down the Lisztstrasse for twenty minutes, and 
his emotion was so great at the sight of the boy 
returning, a letter in hand, that he retreated into 
the doorway and awaited the news. It was 
brief. He read this in Rue's firm handwriting: 

"Your friend Helena has told me all. Here 
is your ring." 

There was no signature. 

Then Paul did what most cowards do. He 
went to the other woman. The storm in his 
soul might be allayed, and he could have the 
pleasure of showing Rue that she was not neces- 
sary to him. Of course the jealousy of Helena 
had spoiled his game; for he really had meant 
245 



BEDOUINS 

to be sincere with Rue, so he told himself in the 
inward, eloquent manner which paves hell with 
composite intentions. It was all clear to him, 
Helena loved him, else why did she tell Rue of 
his double-dealing ? It gave him a glowing feel- 
ing again in his distracted bosom, and as he 
walked into the Hotel Sonne he said between 
clutched teeth: 

"Black wins!" 

He was met by a polite portier, who told him 
that his friends had left on the early train for 
Vienna. But there was a letter ! 

Heart-sick and with trembling hands he tore 
open the envelope. 

"Did you really think I loved an American 
when I can have a Roumanian ? Better console 
your singer." 

No signature. 

"When does the next train leave for Paris?" 
asked Paul of the polite portier. 

There is a rumor in society that Paul God- 
ard is engaged to Edith Vicker. He never 
goes to a Wagner music-drama, and is passion- 
ately addicted to cabaret dancing. 

Americans are versatile. 



246 



V 
THE CARDINAL'S FIDDLE 

YAKOV leaned out of his window and greedily 
listened to the Cardinal playing his fiddle. The 
window was small and under a hot roof. From 
it a view of the great palace of his Eminence was 
easy, for the house of Yakov's mother stood in 
a narrow court at the rear, and was a low-sized 
building, not far from the Cathedral which 
dominated this old-fashioned and once aristo- 
cratic section of the city. The bedroom of the 
boy was on a level with the living-room of the 
Cardinal a tall, spare old man with mild 
eyes and ascetic face. His bushy white hair 
and ruddy complexion, coupled with a high, 
hawk-like nose, gave him the appearance, in 
Yakov's eyes, of a benevolent bird of exotic 
origin. Stranger still was his passion for music. 
At least once a day he could be seen by the lad, 
walking with long, elastic strides about the large 
bare room, a violin tucked under his chin, his 
eyes closed, and he fiddling as if rehearsing for 
a classical concert. Yakov knew it was u clas- 
sical^ music because he couldn't make head or 
tail of it, although he was studying the instru- 
ment himself at the big conservatory on the 
square. But he was only a beginner that's 
247 



BEDOUINS 

what his cross teacher told him when his lesson 
was a poor one and he realized the fact, while 
the Cardinal oh! he played everything diffi- 
cult, and always without notes. 

He wondered why this kindly old gentleman 
in the queer dress should fiddle in the great pal- 
ace across the way; he, so rich and powerful, 
doing for fun what the poor little Yiddish boy 
did as a task. When Yakov could play he 
wouldn't live in a palace, but would try to get 
a' job in a theatre orchestra. His mother an- 
swered his query, "What is a cardinal?" with a 
vague, "Oh, he is a sort of high rabbi/' which 
didn't tell her son much. He was brought up 
in the orthodox faith, went to Shool the syn- 
agogue and was careful to eat no food that 
had not been prepared in Kosher fashion. This 
last practice brought him into conflict with the 
boys of his class at the public school around 
the corner. They were American born, though 
many of foreign descent. That made no differ- 
ence, for, as much as they quarrelled with one 
another, they were a unit as to the undesirabil- 
ity of the Jew. Their teacher had scolded, had 
even punished them, but uselessly. They were 
sarcastic, were these boys of Italian, Irish 
and German parents, calling aloud, "Micky," 
"Dutchy," "Guinney," "Wop," but for Yakov 
and his like in the majority at the school 
they had choicer terms: "Sheeny" "Kike!" 
"Mekmek!" Yakov didn't much mind the 
nicknames. 

248 



THE CARDINAL'S FIDDLE 

He only feared the suddenly delivered punches 
at his back, the vise-like grip of "Jimmy the 
Brick" (self-christened) on his neck, and the 
hateful grin with which a ham sandwich would 
be thrust into his mouth. This last was the 
supreme insult. If he did not complain to his 
teacher, it was because he feared reprisals. So 
he only told his mother, with tears in his large, 
dark, expressive eyes, and she comforted him. 
She said it was the glory of his race, this badge 
of suffering, these insults from the Gentiles. 
He must not fight back, but meekly endure. 
Jehovah would watch over him. She was a 
decent widow woman, who had a small dress- 
making business in her house and barely sup- 
ported herself and child, also giving him a musi- 
cal education. Oh ! to see him a great violinist ! 
She loved music, and as she worked her sewing- 
machine she hummed to its rhythms. Once, 
many years ago, she had heard in Lemberg, her 
Galician birthplace, the greatest violinist in the 
world, Joseph Joachim, and one of her race. 
She was unmarried then, yet she made a silent 
vow that if ever she had a son . . . 

She had Yakov now, and his father was gone. 
She always said to him dead. But she knew 
better. He had deserted her for another woman, 
left her without a dollar, and she had been fight- 
ing for ten years to keep their heads above 
water. Living in this humble yet genteel court 
behind the Cathedral, she dreamed of Yakov's 
future, and she cried with joy when the teacher 
249 



BEDOUINS 

at the conservatory grudgingly admitted that 
the boy had talent and might he coughed his 
reservations with hard work make a fair 
musician. Yakov went to school and in the 
afternoons practised. The weather was warm, 
windows were opened, and he attentively heard 
the fiddle of the Cardinal. 

The music was a succession of beautiful sounds 
for the young visionary. His eyes glittering, his 
lips apart, his arms tightly folded about his thin 
little frame, he listened as if to the voice of God. 
The Cardinal played the slow movement of 
Mendelssohn's concerto, and, threadbare as has 
become this familiar song, to Yakov it was an 
enchantment. Its obvious sentiment seemed a 
call from his dead father in heaven. When the 
music ceased he involuntarily stretched aloft his 
arms. The eye of the Cardinal must have 
caught the glint of white the boy was in his 
shirt-sleeves and came to the window cau- 
tiously, peering across to Yakov. He vaguely 
smiled, and to Yakov's sorrow he closed the 
window, yet the sound of his fiddle softly echoed 
in the ears of the boy. 

Every evening he stationed himself at the 
same spot, but the Cardinal did not play. 
Yakov yearned for his music. His own cheap 
red fiddle became hateful to him. Its rasping 
tones when he attempted scales extinguished his 
ambition. One day his mother said in her purr- 
ing Yiddish: "Yakov, you must be more indus- 
trious, else the gentleman at the conservatory 
250 



THE CARDINAL'S FIDDLE 

will send you home." Even that didn't arouse 
him. He suddenly took to playing in the court 
with the other boys after school. Such rough 
games ! He stood a lot of kicking and punching, 
especially from Jimmy the Brick, who, after all, 
wasn't a bad-hearted chap. He once grabbed 
Yakov's lunch-box and critically swallowed the 
contents, which pleased him, as he liked full- 
flavored food. "Say, Kike, that's not bad 
grub. I like your stuffed fish better than the 
macaroni of that Wop kid Tony." With this 
backing of the boss Yakov enjoyed comparative 
peace. He had thought of revenge, of organiz- 
ing into a compact phalanx the large body of 
Jewish boys at the school, but his mother's ad- 
vice and the patience of his race dissuaded him 
from active rebellion. He let things slide along, 
and in the meantime his music was almost neg- 
lected. In vain did his teacher rap his knuckles 
with the fiddle-bow and threaten him with dis- 
missal. Yakov knew the crosspatch wouldn't 
keep his word, for he was a pay pupil; not much 
pay, to be sure; anyhow, not a charity scholar. 
The magic of a windless June night trans- 
formed the old Red Lion court into an operatic 
picture. Moonlit, it recalled a prosperous past 
that had hardly modulated into its present mid- 
dle-class shabbiness. Old houses, colonial in 
style, but sadly defaced by time, slept tranquilly 
in the magnetic rays of a moon which breasted 
the low housetops. The din and gabble had 
ceased, the only noise being the sound of ham- 
251 



BEDOUINS 

mered iron on the anvil of the blacksmith's at 
the corner. So changed were times that the 
legend over the door of the smithy read, " Soko- 
lov & Griinstein Horseshoers." The ancient 
and honorable profession had been wrested from 
sturdy English and Irish hands by the more per- 
sistent hosts from southeastern Europe. For 
Yakov the change meant nothing, but it gave 
extreme pain to Jimmy's parents, and so Jimmy, 
with his faithful band, was in the habit of yell- 
ing defiant and insulting words at the two 
blacksmiths, though keeping at a safe distance. 
The rhythmic tapping of the hammers brought 
peace to Yakov, who stood in his window re- 
garding with awakened curiosity the spectacle 
of the Cardinal's living-room, lighted for the 
first time in weeks; perhaps ! Presently the 
sound of a fiddle oozed through the open space. 
He was back, the Cardinal with his fiddle. 
What was he playing? Hymn tunes, surely. 
First, the Adeste Fideles, which Yakov remem- 
bered because in a moment of condescending 
generosity Jimmy had taken him to Vespers at 
the Cathedral and had told him the name of 
the music he had heard. 

Then the tune shifted to a more solemn, a 
celestial tune, indeed, which the listener couldn't 
place. He didn't know it was the Jesu, by 
Haydn, but that didn't matter; his ear was rav- 
ished by its pleading strains, and he hung out 
of his perch, tremulously absorbing every tone. 
The Cardinal's humor shifted. He dashed off a 
252 



THE CARDINAL'S FIDDLE 

gay Tipperary jig, and followed this with The 
Valley Lay Smiling Before Me, and The Harp 
of Tara. Yakov felt that the violinist must be 
an Irishman, but ever so different from the noisy 
Jimmy. Yet Irish ! 

What, what! He pinched himself as the 
grave music of the Kol Nidre, the sacred tune 
sounded on the Day of Atonement, came swell- 
ing across the Cardinal's windows. The Kol 
Nidre, that immemorial cantillation of the He- 
brews, in it compressed the dolors of the ages, 
and perhaps first chanted in the house of Egyp- 
tian bondage, perhaps out of the dim centuries 
before Egypt, before the shadowy Sumerians! 
Who knows? What concerned the boy was the 
strange happening a potentate of the Gentile 
Church playing on a fiddle the grand and ven- 
erable hymn of the Jews. But that he was fas- 
cinated by the music he would have rushed 
down to his mother to tell her the glad tidings. 
She knew of the playing across in the palace, 
and was pleased because of Yakov's evident in- 
terest. She would welcome the return of the 
Cardinal, for her boy would be again spurred to 
study. He couldn't leave the window till the 
last note had been squeezed from the august and 
mournful melody. 

In a fever Yakov seized his tiny instrument 
and lovingly mimicked the Cardinal. Its squeak 
reached the priest, who came to the window 
and waited until Yakov's imperfect interpreta- 
tion of the Kol Nidre ended, and, smiling a kind 
253 



BEDOUINS 

smile that melted the heart within the bosom 
of the boy, he waved a slender hand, as if to 
say, "I salute a brother artist!" It was too 
much for Yakov, who ran to his mother's sew- 
ing-room, there to pour out his joy and receive 
her gentle blessing. He, too, would play the 
fiddle like the Cardinal play the Kol Nidre for 
a hall full of listeners, who would applaud him ! 
The mighty Cardinal had played the Kol Nidre 
for the poor little Jew boy, and he hadn't even 
bowed his profound gratitude ! 

On wings of song, he mounted the stairway to 
his garret, but the music was no longer heard, 
though the windows were still alight. Not able 
to control himself, Yakov took his instrument, 
and, all the while playing, marched down-stairs 
into the court, and in the mystic moonshine he 
played on, played the Kol Nidre. Soon the 
gang surrounded him, and Jimmy the Brick 
cried: "Aw, give us a rest with that tune. Play 
a coon song." Yakov only shook his head and 
kept on playing. 

"Stop it, I say!" yelled Jimmy. "We want 
none of yer Kike music in this court. D'ye 
hear?" Yakov still played, and the tune rang 
out with the terror and desolation of the Day 
of Atonement. 

"Hit him, Tony ! Grab his fiddle, you Wop ! " 
hoarsely commanded the leader. The boys 
closed about him and in a twinkling the current 
of the music was cut off, the red violin smashed 
into a hundred bits, the bow snapped in two and 
254 



THE CARDINAL'S FIDDLE 

its coarse hair twisted about Yakov's neck. He 
fought silently, tearlessly. The firm of Sokolov 
& Griinstein came to his rescue, and, being mus- 
cular men, they routed the band and sent the 
victim to his home with consoling phrases. But 
he was hopeless. That another fiddle might be 
bought for him found no place in his whirling 
imagination. He had been cruelly treated. 
Why should he be so punished ? As he sank on 
his knees at his attic window tears flowed and 
sobs followed. Yakov mourned and would not 
be comforted. And across the court in the 
chamber of the palace the Cardinal played with 
exquisite melancholy that antique Hebraic tune, 
the Kol Nidre. 



255 



VI 

RENUNCIATION 

The hearts of some women are as a vast cathedral. 
There are its gorgeous high altars, its sounding gloom, its 
lofty arches, and perhaps in an obscure niche burns a tiny 
taper before the votive shrine. And many pass through 
life with this taper unlighted, despite the pomp and cere- 
monial of the conjugal comedy. Others carry in the little 
chapel of their hearts a solitary glimmering lamp of love 
that only flames out with death. 

A GRAND piano, its burnished ivory teeth 
gleaming in the candle-light, stood near the 
open window, and at it one lounged and idly 
preluded Schumann-like harmonies that ques- 
tioned the night. Outside a veiled fumidity, 
behind which lurked thunderous prospects; the 
air was still with languorous anticipation, and 
the month of the year was April. He would 
not have been human and an artist to have 
withstood the dumb depression of the moment. 
Snatches of heavily brocaded harmonies of 
Chopin, mute interrogations of Brahms, and 
furtive glitterings of Liszt vibrated through the 
chamber. One sultry chord, persistently re- 
peated and unresolved, told the temper of him 
who played. 

It was a sober"apartment; a half-score of wax 
tapers sang with a bunch of tuberoses a sweet 
duo. 

256 



RENUNCIATION 

A few chairs, some music scattered about, a 
tall bookcase, gaunt and shadowy in the back- 
ground, and a polished floor made the ensemble 
of an artist's living-room. The playing grew 
vaguer and the night without more menac- 
ing. Then the first eight or ten bars of the 
prelude to Tristan und Isolde forced into shape 
on the keyboard and hush ! a delicate knock 
at the door. He harshly called, "Entrez!" 
She was without a wrap, her head enveloped in 
a filmy burnoose. She faltered, then moved 
to him as moves a sleep-walker. "I know that 
it is wrong, but I how can I help it ? I have 
come to you and you?" She paused, her 
face illuminated by love-doubt. His voice was 
muffled when he answered her, "Pray be seated, 
madame." 

She divined his reluctance: "We leave to- 
morrow, and you must play for me once more." 

"I could have called at your hotel," he gently 
replied. 

Impetuously she cried: "I have risked much 
to be near you, to hear you play; yet you stand 
coldly, and after yesterday Ah, you for- 
get!" 

"I do not forget," he replied. 

She moved toward him; his reserve vanished 
and he advanced with both hands outstretched. 
"Dearest, it is madness. See, it is late; you 
will be missed, and the night bodes a storm. 
Play ! I would play for you if Paradise threat- 
ened and hell yawned rather than refuse you." 
257 



BEDOUINS 

"Play!" she cried. "Play for me Chopin, 
but do not come near me." He shivered, and 
their eyes kissed, hers burning like misty-green 
signals of love and sorrow; then he faced the 
night for a moment, and turning to the piano 
began without preluding. 

It was the Second Impromptu of Chopin, the 
rarely heard one in the key of F sharp, major 
mode. As he struck the octave in the bass the 
approaching storm muttered in the west, the 
wind soughed into the room, and the flame 
of the wax tapers flickered faint messages 
to the tuberoses. She on the couch sighed 
softly. The magic of Chopin enveloped them 
as the plaintive theme broke the air into melodic 
ripples. It sang her into depths of dreams, 
anterior to which lurked other dreams dreams 
with soft-sounding syllables, dreams that lapped 
her consciousness into the golden gloom of 
drugged slumber, dreams opal-tinted and music- 
melancholy beyond compare. She swooned and 
then swam out to the infinite with bold, blissful 
strokes, for he was playing with rare cunning 
the closing choral-like measures of the first part 
of the Impromptu. 

The moan without deepened into a roar, then 
came a vermilion flash followed by a crash of 
thunder. The lights were extinguished, all but 
one, swayed feebly in the rush of the wind, and 
the tuberoses listened thirstily to the plash of 
the new-born rain. 

He had begun the D major section of the Im- 

258 



RENUNCIATION 

promptu; the rhythmical swing of the bass 
seemed a proud spirit defying destiny, and the 
massive chords, with virile assertive tones, 
blended with the night and roared answer to 
the thunder's bellow. They rose to a crescendo, 
they dominated all, for the man within was 
storming out his resolves and passions on the 
keyboard. The fury increased to a sheer height 
of tone; then, melting away into a mere echo, it 
almost fainted. His soul chased hers and to- 
gether they followed the enigmatic tones of that 
modulation which is an abysm betwixt fragrant 
meads, and warns them that seek its depths. 
The lovely F major part glimmered in the air. 

"Come back to me, to the first of all; 
Let us learn and love it over again. 
Let us now forget and now recall, 

Break the rosary in a pearly rain, 
And gather what we let fall." 

"Browning," she softly mused, "and life." 
The plot thickened, the harmony grew denser 
a musical palimpsest lay before them, and as 
they strove to unweave its meaning they shud- 
dered at the gulf. Weary and panting in spirit 
they stared askance and questioned the future. 
"Not that," the music implored. Then burst 
that delicious cascade of silvery scales. They 
coruscated, they foamed, they boiled with melo- 
dic laughter. It seemed as if God was with the 
world and he and she heard the lark trilling to 
the dawn as hand in hand they mounted in 
259 



BEDOUINS 

their dizzy flight. Their naked, unabashed 
souls groped in the azure and they carolled that 
song which is as old as eternity. They fell 
through space into fathomless twilight, and the 
piano sang the echo-like refrain of the first 
motif. It was the swan-song of their hopes. 
The heavy-scented night spoke softly to their 
hearts; a nightingale dimly piped in the distance, 
and with velvety clangor the music ceased. 

He remained at the piano. She rose. With- 
out were odors and starlight. The two drank 
each other's gaze with the thirst of lost souls. 
Then she went into the night, and the other one, 
staring at the tuberoses, heard their perfumed 
murmur: "Renounce thou shalt; thou shalt re- 
nounce." 



260 



VII 
THE VISION MALEFIC 

"To be in Heaven the second, he disdains: 
So now the first in Hell and flames he reigns, 
Crown'd once with joy and light: crown'd now with fire 
and pains." 

Phineas Fletcher (1582). 

I AM not a diabolist. I was an agnostic until 
... I have read Huysmans and I do not believe 
he ever saw half he describes. Yet I, and in 
commonplace America, have seen things, have 
heard things, that would make mad the group 
of Parisian occultists. I dislike publicity, but 
Vance Thompson has asked me to relate the 
story, and so I mean to give it, names and all, 
with the fauit hope that it may serve as a warn- 
ing to callow astrologists, and all the younger 
generation affected by the writings of impious 
men who deny the existence of the devil. 

More than twenty years ago I was the organist 
of a Roman Catholic church in the lower part 
of my city. I had studied the instrument in 
Germany and believed in Johann Sebastian 
Bach. I played and pedalled fugues on week- 
days for my own pleasure, and on Sundays exe- 
cuted with unction easy masses by Bordoni, 
Mercadante, and Haydn; my choir was not an 
ambitious one. The stipendium was small, the 
261 



BEDOUINS 

work light, and the two priests amiable enough. 
One, a German, Father Oelschlager, was the 
rector. His assistant was an Irishman with 
French blood in his veins. His name shall I 
ever forget his name and face? was Father 
Michael Moreau. He was crazy about music 
and occultism. The former he made no secret 
of; the latter I discovered only after a long ac- 
quaintance. Moreau came to the organ-loft 
when I practised on week-days, sang a little, 
and feasted much on Bach chorales. Urged 
often to visit his room, I did so, and he showed 
me rare black-letter missals, and later the backs 
of a number of old books whose titles I could 
not decipher. I am no Latinist, yet I knew 
these volumes were written neither in Latin nor 
Greek. The characters I had never seen before, 
and when I remarked their strangeness, Father 
Moreau smiled and even laughed as I quoted 
Poe: "the volumes of the Magi in the iron- 
bound melancholy volumes of the Magi." 

Music led us to discuss religion, and my friend 
astonished me by his erudition. His sensitive 
features would become illuminated when he 
spoke of the strange tales of the Talmud. "Oh, 
my God !" he would cry with a patibulary ges- 
ture. "Why hast Thou not vouchsafed us more 
light?" And then would beg for Bach, and on 
the mighty stream of the D minor fugue his har- 
assed mind seemed to float and find comfort. As 
time wore on he grew morbid, morose, reticent, 
and devoted himself to his dull duties with a 
262 



THE VISION MALEFIC 

fanaticism that was almost harsh. The parish- 
ioners noticed it, and his reputation for saint- 
liness increased. His confessional was always 
crowded and his sermons remarkable for the 
acerbity, the awful pictures he made of the suf- 
ferings of the damned and of the relentlessness 
of God's wrath. His superior, good-natured 
Father Oelschlager, bade the other look at the 
cheerful side of the question, to believe more in 
God's mellowness and sweetness, and would 
quote Cardinal Newman's Lead Kindly Light, 
and certain comforting texts from the Scriptures, 
and then smoke his pipe. But the ascetic tem- 
perament of Moreau barred all attempts at pal- 
liation or attenuation of the God of Hosts, of 
the God who laid low the pride of Greece and 
Rome. Life to him was a cancer to be extir- 
pated, and he confessed to me one night after 
rehearsal that he had almost doubted God's 
existence and courted suicide after reading 
Renan's Vie de Jesus. I suggested change of 
scene, less strenuous labors, above all, the world, 
music, and athletics. My advice availed not, 
and I saw that Father Moreau was fast becom- 
ing a monomaniac. His sermons during the 
hot summer were devoted to the personality of 
the devil, to his corporeal existence, to his daily 
presence in the marts of mankind; and so con- 
stant was his harping on this theme that Father 
Oelschlager had to forbid him the subject. "It 
is so warm, my son ! Why, then, do you hold 
forth on hell? Let the poor people hear more 
263 



BEDOUINS 

of the crystal rivers, the green meads of the 
New Jerusalem. It would be more seasonable." 
Moreau frowned, but obeyed his superior. 

With the autumn and winter his habits became 
more secretive, his visits to me less frequent, 
and his air of detachment most melancholy. 
Advent saw him a mere wraith of a man, worn 
by speculation, devoured by an interior flame, a 
flame that was wasting his very soul to despair. 
He seldom conversed with me, although I 
watched him anxiously and occasionally interro- 
gated him regarding his health. At last I spoke 
to his associate, but encountered an easy-going 
philosophic spirit, which assured me Father 
Moreau was going through what most young 
priests should. He was at the period of unfaith, 
was nettled by doubt, and after he had wrestled 
with Satan, and won the good fight, he would 
again become normal. This seemed consoling 
though vague. 

The day before Christmas I promised that I 
would not send a substitute to play the mid- 
night mass at the church. Our church was the 
only one in the city where the old-fashioned 
mass at twelve o'clock on Christmas Eve was 
celebrated. It is located near the river, and my 
journey was a long one, for I lived up-town. I 
ate a six o'clock supper and went to bed, telling 
them to arouse me at a quarter before eleven. 
I wished to be fresh for the early service. By 
eleven I was out on the street, and took a car 
bound south. I reached the church in time, 
264 



THE VISION MALEFIC 

and soon the solemn high mass began. My 
choir had with elaborate care prepared Cheru- 
bim's mass, and despite the poor organ, the 
extra chorus and much enthusiasm made some 
effect. The congregation was attentive, and 
Father Oelschlager delivered a short, happy ser- 
mon, urging his flock to rejoice at the birth of 
the Babe of Bethlehem, Jesus the Infant Christ, 
uncrucified, but newly born into a world of toil 
and sin for our redemption. At the consecra- 
tion of the host the good rector's beaming faith 
was most edifying. He was served by Father 
Moreau, a melancholy deacon, indeed. "Ite 
Missa Est" pronounced, the faithful dismissed, 
I was overjoyed at the release, for I was tired. 
The choir chatted about the service, the singing, 
and at last I was alone. I placed the music- 
books back in the tall Gothic cupboard, closed 
the manuals of my instrument, and put on my 
overcoat. It must have been half past one, per- 
haps quarter of two, and I relished the prospect 
of my arrival home, where a warm breakfast 
would be awaiting me, and then once more to 
bed, for I had to play the regular half past ten 
o'clock Christmas mass for the benefit of the 
sleepy ones, who loved their couch better than 
their Christ. 

Father Moreau met me at the bottom of the 
choir-loft steps. He was dressed for the street, 
his eyes were blazing, and as he took my arm 
his fingers were vise-like. "Will you come with 
me?" he asked. I was startled. I explained 
265 



BEDOUINS 

that I would not have much rest, nor should he 
waste his sleeping time on the dismal, cold 
streets; besides, I was hungry. I feared that he 
was about to deluge me with more of his studies 
in the customs of the early Gnostics, and, to be 
quite frank, I was worn out and not in a recep- 
tive humor for such untoward cryptic wisdom. 
Any other time "Will you come with me?" 
he reiterated, and the clutch on my arm became 
oppressive. "Where?" I asked, for I hated to 
affront a friend. "Will you come with me?" 

By this time the church was quite empty, 
and I pushed out into the street. It was dark 
and snowing hard. We walked toward the 
street, and as we neared the corner I heard the 
lucky sound of a horse-car there were no 
trolleys then. I excused myself, ran and caught 
the car; the priest, following, sat down beside 
me. I paid both fares, and as I had nothing to 
say we preserved a sad silence. The mean light, 
the deserted streets, the lonely car, and the 
muffled strokes of the horses' hoofs on the snow 
chilled my soul. I looked sideways at Father 
Moreau. He was reading a big parchment- 
covered book, which I saw by the dim lamplight 
was entitled Le Satanisme, by Jules Bois. I was 
shocked. A priest fresh from the holy sacrifice 
of the mass devouring the blasphemies that I 
was sure were in the gruesome volume, alarmed 
my piety. Presently he saw me and shut its 
leaves. "There are curious things in it, my 
dear friend," he muttered, and his voice came 
266 



THE VISION MALEFIC 

from across a waste of sorrow. " Curious things; 
but you are a believer, are you not?" he eagerly 
repeated. "I am," I replied devoutly, and I 
crossed myself. He fairly jumped at me, his 
eyes wide open and full of devouring flames. 
"Will you come with me?" he almost screamed, 
and for the fourth time. "East Street," called 
out the conductor, and rather than let my half- 
mad companion alone he surely must have 
been mad I left the car with him, the con- 
ductor gazing after us with cynical eyes. He 
evidently took us for belated revellers. 

We walked slowly for ten minutes until we 
arrived in front of a sad-looking church, and 
then I stopped: "The place is not open yet; 
they do not have Christmas service until five 
o'clock." For the last time my companion 
whispered, "Will you come with me?" and, 
pushing past me, struck three times on the big 
doors. A small postern gate opened at once 
and we entered the vaulted passageway. I 
trembled at the strangeness of the adventure, 
and held fast to Moreau, for it was pitch black, 
and while I heard soft footfalls beside me the 
footfalls of an unknown man I could not see 
my hand before my face. We must have trav- 
ersed a long yard, for the wind blew freely 
about me; I heard it playing on the housetops 
like a balloon in distress. Yet it felt as if issuing 
from a sepulchre, and my heart went to my 
empty stomach. Even in my growing terror I 
craved for coffee; its aroma would have made 
267 



BEDOUINS 

me stronger for this inhuman cruise. We went 
down eleven steps I counted them my con- 
ductors on either side of me. Dampness and 
malodors warned me of our proximity to some 
ancient cellarage, some forgotten catacombs, 
wherein Father Moreau expected to give me a 
sacerdotal surprise, a revival perhaps of an 
antique and early Christian ritual. I feebly 
applauded his intentions, but wished he had 
chosen some other time and that the surround- 
ings had been less sinister. 

At last we paused and descended another 
flight of steps this time I didn't number them, 
for the cold was intense, and it was with 
relief that we suddenly arrived in a dimly lighted 
and warm chapel. It was empty, devoid of 
pews, of chairs, of furnishings of any sort, except, 
at the upper end, a small votive altar. Before 
it swung a lamp of Byzantine workmanship, in 
which burned a solitary tongue of yellow flame. 
The lamp swayed rhythmically, and on the altar 
were two tall tapers, lighted and perfumed. And 
then my eyes rested on the spot where should 
have been the tabernacle, surmounted by the 
gold cross. Judge of my consternation when I 
saw, saw as distinctly as I see the pen which 
traces these letters, a huge bronze serpent, with 
overlapping, glistening, metallic scales. The eyes 
of this python were almost feminine, and their 
regard gentle, reproachful, and voluptuous. My 
knees bent beneath me and my face was wet 
with fright. 

268 



THE VISION MALEFIC 

"You are a believer, then?" crooned a dull 
voice in my ear. It was Moreau. He had 
thrown off his outer wrap and stood in a black 
soutane. He was white with emotion and said 
in tenderest accents: "Listen; be my friend. 
Do not desert me at the crisis of my life. It is 
to be my first mass, my first three o'clock mass. 
My deacon is already at the altar. Be the soli- 
tary worshipper. It will be a low mass re- 
member, a low mass!" He spoke clearly, rap- 
idly, sanely, and seeing that I had something 
more than a lunatic to deal with, I removed my 
overcoat and knelt down near the altar just as 
Father Moreau ascended its steps, his assistant 
holding the end of his Hack canonicals. If it 
had not been for the apparition of the serpent, 
I might have fancied that I was assisting at the 
lonely, pious vigil of a parochial curate. But 
the eyes of the serpent devoured mine, and I 
had none for the two silhouetted figures that 
went through with febrile velocity the familiar 
motions of the mass. It was low mass, and 
from the introit to the preface the space was 
scarcely appreciable. I heard mumblings, and 
the air became chillier as the celebrants moved 
and bowed or extended arms; the air grew colder, 
denser, and tenser. It vibrated like the wires 
of a monstrous zither, and my temples throbbed 
as if in the midst of a magnetic storm. I felt 
that I was nearing a great catastrophe, that God 
had abandoned His universe to its wicked will, 
and that I must sob, or scream, or pray, or die, 
269 



BEDOUINS 

or be damned forever, or the tap of the sil- 
very little bell was as if a sweet summer air had 
swum over my agitated soul. It was the bell 
that announced the solemn moment when God 
became man, when the divine spirit, by the 
miracle of transubstantiation. became flesh and 
blood. 

In an ecstasy of faith, of awe, I plunged on 
my face and adored and wept, and a mighty 
wind swept from the altar with strange moanings 
and lamentings, and the lights were extinguished; 
yet there was a luminous fog, that enfolded 
us, and in it I saw the great serpent, symbol of 
wisdom, symbol of eternity, rear spirally aloft, 
and beneath it oh, beneath it! was the 
Beatific Vision. In swelling nimbus of flame 
was a counterfeit Mother of God, and holding 
the hand of Him, of the Infant, Jesus, born but 
three hours, and oh, the horror of it! not 
my Christ, not our Christ, not the Christ of the 
Christians, but an Antichrist from some fetid 
hell, sent to seduce us, curse us, destroy us! 
My eyes almost burst from their sockets, and 
the humming of hell's loom roared about me as 
I met the gaze of the Woman. And now 
her eyes were the serpent's eyes, and on her head 
was the crown of hell and its multiple kingdoms. 
She was naked, and set against her breasts were 
sharp swords. She was Mater Malorum, and 
her breath sowed discord, lust, and cruel murder. 
I yearned to pronounce the name of the true 
Mother of God, to bid this blinding vision, this 
270 



THE VISION MALEFIC 

damnable vision, vanish, but my tongue was 
like wet twine and my sight blistered by the 
pageantry of Satan, of Satan and his Dam. And 
as I struggled the silvery little bell tapped once 
more, and in a fading perspective I saw the 
Madonna and the Child give me such a sweet, 
beseeching glance that my heart dissolved within 
me, and I cried aloud, my tongue snapping in 
the roof of my mouth: 

"Mary, Mother of God, preserve us from the 
Devil and all his works!" A withering streak 
of light struck my eyeballs, and I glimpsed the 
serpent falling to earth with distended jaws, as 
two priestly figures reeled off the altar-steps, 
and in the brassy clangor of despair we fell, all 
three, and swooning blackness shut down upon 
us like smothering velvet. 

It was still dark when solicitous hands lifted 
me to my feet: my coat was thrown about my 
shoulders, and I was hurried in shivering gloom 
to the street. The other one disappeared at the 
little postern gate, and, parting outside, with 
damp, hot hands, and face plastered with hide- 
ous passion, the mad priest said to me, in a 
cracked voice: 

"You have seen my God, the only true God 
of hell heaven and earth/' 



271 



BOOKS BY JAMES HUNEKER 



What some distinguished writers have said of 
them : 

Maurice Maeterlinck wrote, May 15, 1905: "Do 
you know that 'Iconoclasts' is the only book of high 
and universal critical worth that we have had for 
years to be precise, since Georg Brandes. It is at 
once strong and fine, supple and firm, indulgent and 
sure." 

And of "Ivory Apes and Peacocks" he said, among 
other things: "I have marvelled at the vigilance and 
clarity with which you follow and judge the new liter- 
ary and artistic movements in all countries. L do not 
know of criticism more pure and sure than yours." 
(October, 1915.) 

"The Mercure de France translated the other day 
from Scribner's one of the best studies which have been 
written on Stendhal for a long tune, in which there was 
no evasion of the question of Stendhal's immorality. 
The author of that article, James Huneker, is, among 
foreign critics, the one best acquainted with French 
literature and the one who judges us with the greatest 
sympathy and with the most freedom. He has pro- 
tested with force in numerous American journals 
against the campaign of defamation against France and 
he has easily proved that those who participate in it 
are ignorant and fanatical." "Promenades Litteraires" 
(Troisieme Serie), Remy de Gourmont. (Translated by 
Burton Rascoe for the Chicago Tribune.) 



Paul Bourget wrote, Lundi de Paques, 1909, of 
"Egoists": "I have browsed through the pages of 
your book and found that you touch in a sympathetic 
style on diverse problems, artistic and literary. In the 
case of Stendhal your catholicity of treatment is ex- 
tremely rare and courageous." 



Dr. Geprg Brandes, the versatile and profound 
Danish critic, wrote: "I find your breadth of view 
and its expression more European than^ American; but 
the essential thing is that you are an artist to your very 
marrow." 



BOOKS BY JAMES HUNEKER 



UNICORNS 

"The essays are short, full of a satisfying and fascinating 
crispness, both memorable and delightful. And they are full of 
fancy, too, of the gayest humor, the quickest appreciation, the 
gentlest sympathy, sometimes of an enchanting extravagance." 

New York Times. 



MELOMANIACS 

"It would be difficult to sum up 'Melomaniacs' in a phrase. 
Never did a book, in my opinion at any rate, exhibit greater con- 
trasts, not, perhaps, of strength and weakness, but of clearness and 
obscurity." 
HAROLD E. GORST, in London Saturday Review (Dec. 8, 1906). 



VISIONARIES 

"In 'The Spiral Road' and in some of the other stories both fan- 
tasy and narrative may be compared with Hawthorne in his most 
unearthly moods. The younger man has read his Nietzsche and has 
cast off his heritage of simple morals. Hawthorne's Puritanism finds 
no echo in these modern souls, all sceptical, wavering, and unblessed. 
But Hawthorne's splendor of vision and his power of sympathy with 
a tormented mind do live again in the best of Mr. Huneker's stories." 
London Academy (Feb. 3, 1906). 



ICONOCLASTS: 

A Book of Dramatists 

"His style is a little jerky, but it is one of those rare styles in which 
e are led to expect some significance, if not wit, in every sentence." 
G. K. CHESTERTON, in London Daily News. 



MEZZOTINTS IN MODERN 
MUSIC 

"Mr. Huneker is, in the best sense, a critic; he listens to the 
music and gives you his impressions as rapidly and in as few words 
as possible; or he sketches the composers in fine, broad, sweeping 
strokes with a magnificent disregard for unimportant details. And 
as Mr. Huneker is, as I have said, a powerful personality, a man of 
quick brain and an energetic imagination, a man of moods and tem- 
perament a string that vibrates and sings in response to music 
we get in these essays of his a distinctly original and very valuable 
contribution to the world's tiny musical literature." 

J. F. RUNCMAN, in London Saturday Review. 



BOOKS BY JAMBS HUNEKER 



IVORY APES AND PEACOCKS 

"Out of the depressing welter of our American writing upon 
aesthetics, with its incredible thinness and triteness and paltriness, 
its intellectual sterility, its miraculous dulness, its limitless and 
appalling vapidity, Mr. James Huneker, and the small and honor- 
able minority of his peers, emerge with a conspicuousness that is 
both comforting and disgraceful. . . . Susceptibility, clairvoyance, 
immediacy of response, are his; he is the friend of any talent that is 
fine and strange and frank enough to incur the dislike of the mighty 
army of Bourbons, Puritans, and Boeotians. He is innocent of 
prepossessions. He is infinitely flexible and generous. Yet if, in 
the twenty years that we have been reading him, he has ever praised 
a commonplace talent, we have no recollection of it. His critical 
tact is well-nigh infallible. . . . His position among writers on 
sesthetics is anomalous and incredible: no merchant traffics in his 
heart, yet he commands a large, an eager, an affectionate public. 
Is it because he is both vivid and acute, robust yet fine-fingered, 
tolerant yet unyielding, astringent yet tender a mellow pessimist, 
a kindly cynic? Or is it rather because he is, primarily, a tem- 
perament dynamic, contagious, lovable, inveterately alive ex- 
pressing itself through the most transparent of the arts?" 
LAWRENCE OILMAN, in North American Review (October, 1915). 



NEW COSMOPOLIS 

"Mr. James Huneker, critic of music in the first place, is a crafts- 
man of diverse accomplishment who occupies a distinctive and 
distinguished place among present-day American essayists. He is 
intensely 'modern,' well read in recent European writers, and not 
lacking sympathy with the more rebellious spirits. Ancient seren- 
ity has laid no chastening hand on his thought and style, but he has 
achieved at times a fineness of expression that lifts his work above 
that of the many eager and artistic souls who strive to be the thinkers 
of New England to-day. He flings off his impressions at fervent 
heat; he is not ashamed to be enthusiastic; and he cannot escape 
that large sentimentality which, to less disciplined transatlantic 
writers, is known nakedly as 'heart interest.' Out of his chaos 
of reading and observation he has, however, evolved a criticism of 
life that makes for intellectual cultivation, although it is of a Bo- 
hemian rather than an academic kind. Given a different environ- 
ment, another training, Mr. Huneker might have emerged as an 
American Walter Pater." London Athenaeum (November 6, 1915)- 



BOOKS BY JAMES HUNEKER 

FRANZ LISZT 

WITH NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS 



CHOPIN: The Man and His Music 



OVERTONES: 

A Book of Temperaments 

WITH FRONTISPIECE PORTRAIT OF RICHARD STRAUSS 

"In some respects Mr. Huneker must be reckoned the most 
brilliant of all living writers on matters musical." 

Academy, London. 



THE PATHOS OF DISTANCE 

A Book of a Thousand and One Moments 

"He talks about Bergson as well as Matisse; he never can keep 
still about Wagner; he hauls over his French library of modern 
immortals, and he gives a touch to George Moore, to Arthur Davies, 
and to many another valiant worker in paint, music, and letters. 
The book is stimulating; brilliant even with an unexpected bril- 
liancy." Chicago Tribune. 



PROMENADES OF AN 
IMPRESSIONIST 

"We like best such sober essays as those which analyze for us the 
technical contributions of Cezanne and Rodin. Here Mr. Huneker 
is a real interpreter, and here his long experience of men and ways 
in art counts for much. Charming, in the slighter vein, are such 
appreciations as the Monticelli and Chardin." FRANK JEWETT 
MATHER, JR., in New York Nation and Evening Post. 



EGOISTS 

WITH PORTRAIT AND FACSIMILE REPRODUCTIONS 

"Closely and yet lightly written, full of facts, yet as amusing as 
a bit of discursive talk, penetrating, candid, and very shrewd." 
ROYAL CORTISSOZ, in the New York Tribune. 

CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS, NEW YORK 



THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ 

This book is due on the last DATE stamped below. 



Om-8,'65(F6282s8)2373 



PS2044.H4B4 




3 2106 00207 30C 



V1NVS 



dO