Skip to main content

Full text of "Biological integrity of Logan Creek (Flathead-Stillwater TMDL planning area) based on the structure and composition of the Benthic algae community"

See other formats


MONTANA  STATE  LIBB4nv 

!1l'1fT1T'f'ff 

3  0864  10022550  0 

BIOLOGICAL  INTEGRITY  OF  LOGAN  CREEK 

(FLATHEAD-STILLWATER  TMDL  PLANNING  AREA) 

BASED  ON  THE  STRUCTURE  AND  COMPOSITION  OF 

THE  BENTHIC  ALGAE  COMMUNITY 


Prepared  for: 

State  of  Montana 

Department  of  Environmental  Quality 

P.O.  Box  200901 

Helena,  Montana    59620-0901 

Contract  Officer:  Rosie  Sada 
DEQ  Contract  No.  200012-10 


Prepared  by: 

Loren  L.  Bahls,  Ph.D. 

Hannaea 

1032  Twelfth  Avenue 

Helena,  Montana    59601 


January  12,2004 


STATE  DOCUMENTS  COLLECTI, 

■  ■  ■  ■  c  2004 

MONTANA  STATE  LIBRARY 

1515  E.  6th  AVE. 
HELENA.  MONTANA  59620 


Printed  tin  Paper  Mnde  from  lOOVa  Recycled  Posl-Consumer  Fiber 


Summary 

In  July  2003,  periphyton  samples  were  collected  from  3  sites  on  Logan  Creek  in  the 
Flathead-Stillwater  River  TMDL  planning  area  in  northwestern  Montana  for  the  purpose  of 
assessing  whether  this  stream  is  water-quality  limited  and  in  need  of  TMDLs.  The  samples  were 
collected  following  MDEQ  standard  operating  procedures,  processed  and  analyzed  following 
standard  methods  for  periphyton,  and  evaluated  following  modified  USEPA  rapid  bioassessment 
protocols  for  wadeable  streams. 

Diatom  metrics  indicated  minor  stress  but  full  support  of  aquatic  life  uses  at  all 
three  sites  on  Logan  Creek.  An  elevated  percentage  of  motile  diatoms  indicated  minor 
sedimentation  at  the  upper  two  stations:   Logan  Creek  above  Cyclone  Creek  and  Logan  Creek 
above  Star  Meadows.   .A  large  number  oi  Achnanthidiian  minutissimuin  at  these  sites  also 
indicated  minor  disturbance,  which  probably  resulted  from  natural  causes.  These  two  sites 
supported  virtually  identical  diatom  assemblages,  which  had  excellent  species  richness  and 
diversity  for  a  mountain  stream.  The  non-diatom  algae  at  these  sites  were  a  healthy  mix  of 
cyanobacteria,  green  algae,  and  the  chrysophyte  Vaucheria  (above  Cyclone  Creek  only). 
Nitrogen  was  probably  the  limiting  nutrient  above  Star  Meadows. 

The  periphyton  community  at  the  Tally  Lake  Campground  was  significantly  different 
from  the  communities  at  the  upstream  sites.  The  Tally  Lake  sample  was  dominated  by  two 
genera  of  nitrogen-fixing  cyanobacteria  {Rivularia  and  Nostoc),  which  indicate  that  nitrogen  was 
probably  the  limiting  nutrient  here.  The  rare  and  pollution-sensitive  brown  alga  Herihaudiella 
was  abundant  here  and  ranked  third  in  biovolume.  The  diatom  assemblage  at  Tally  Lake 
Campground  was  dominated  by  attached  species  that  are  sensitive  to  organic  pollution.  A  large 
percentage  of  Cocconeis  placentiila  indicated  minor  stress  that  was  probably  natural  and  related 
to  the  prevailing  substrate  at  this  site.  Although  diatom  metrics  indicate  that  this  site  had  good 
biological  integrity,  modal  categories  for  diatom  ecological  attributes  indicate  that  the  site  had 
significantly  higher  alkalinity,  larger  concentrations  of  inorganic  nutrients  (phosphorus),  and 
smaller  concentrations  of  dissolved  oxygen  than  the  two  upstream  sites. 


Introduction 

This  report  evaluates  the  biological  integrity',  support  of  aquatic  life  uses,  and  probable 
causes  of  stress  or  impairment  to  aquatic  communities  in  Logan  Creek  in  the  Flathead-Stillwater 
River  TMDL  Planning  Area  of  northwestern  Montana.    The  purpose  of  this  report  is  to  provide 
information  that  will  help  the  State  of  Montana  determine  whether  Logan  Creek  is  water-quality 
limited  and  in  need  of  TMDLs. 

The  federal  Clean  Water  Act  directs  states  to  develop  water  pollution  control  plans  (Total 
Maximum  Daily  Loads  or  TMDLs)  that  set  limits  on  pollution  loading  to  water-quality  limited 
waters.  Water-quality  limited  waters  are  lakes  and  stream  segments  that  do  not  meet  water- 
quality  standards,  that  is,  that  do  not  fully  support  their  beneficial  uses.  The  Clean  Water  Act 
and  USEPA  regulations  require  each  state  to  (1)  identify  waters  that  are  water-quality  limited, 
(2)  prioritize  and  target  waters  for  TMDLs,  and  (3)  develop  TMDL  plans  to  attain  and  maintain 
water-quality  standards  for  all  water-quality  limited  waters. 

Evaluation  of  aquatic  life  use  support  in  this  report  is  based  on  the  species  composition 
and  structure  of  periphyton  (aka  benthic  algae,  phytobenthos)  communities  at  three  sites  on 
Logan  Creek  that  were  sampled  in  early  July  of  2003.  Periphyton  is  a  di\erse  assortment  of 
simple  photosynthetic  organisms  called  algae  that  live  attached  to  or  in  close  proximity  of  the 
stream  bottom.  Some  algae  form  long  filaments  or  large  gelatinous  colonies  that  are 
conspicuous  to  the  unaided  eye.  But  most  algae,  including  the  ubiquitous  diatoms,  can  be  seen 
and  identified  only  with  the  aid  of  a  microscope.  The  periph>l;on  community  is  a  basic 
biological  component  of  all  aquatic  ecosystems.  Periphyton  accounts  for  much  of  the  primary 
production  and  biological  diversity  in  Montana  streams  (Bahls  et  al.  1992).  Plafkin  et  al.  (1989) 
and  Barbour  et  al.  (1999)  list  several  advantages  of  using  periphyton  in  biological  assessments. 


Biological  integrity  is  defined  as  "the  ability  of  an  aquatic  ecosystem  to  support  and  maintain  a  balanced, 
integrated,  adaptive  communiry  of  organisms  having  a  species  composition,  diversit)',  and  functional  organization 
comparable  to  that  of  natural  habitats  within  a  region"  (Karr  and  Dudley  1981). 


Project  Area  and  Sampling  Sites 

The  project  area  is  located  within  Level  IV  ecoregion  15i  (Salish  Mountains),  which  is 
part  of  the  Northern  Rockies  Ecoregion  in  Flathead  County,  Montana  (Woods  et  al.  1999).  The 
Salish  Mountains  are  forested  and  underlain  by  Precambrian  Belt  rocks.  Its  crests  are  mantled 
with  \olcanic  ash.  rarely  exceed  an  elevation  of  7,000  feet,  and  lack  the  alpine  zones  that  occur 
in  higher  mountains.  Average  precipitation  is  about  20  to  50  inches  per  year.  The  region  was 
glaciated  by  the  Cordilleran  ice  sheet,  which  modified  physiography  and  deposited  till.  Climax 
vegetation  consists  of  Douglas-fir,  subalpine  fir,  grand  fir,  and  Engelmann  spruce  forests.  The 
main  land  uses  are  logging,  recreation,  watershed,  and  wildlife  habitat. 

Periphyton  samples  were  collected  at  three  sites  on  Logan  Creek  upstream  from  Tally 
Lake  (Table  1).     Logan  Creek  is  a  tributary  of  the  Sullwater  River  (USGS  HUC  17010210), 
which  is  a  tributar>-  of  the  Flathead  River.  Logan  Creek  is  classified  B-1  in  the  Montana  Surface 
Water  Quality  Standards. 

Methods 

Periphyton  samples  were  collected  following  standard  operating  procedures  of  the 
MDEQ  Planning,  Prevention,  and  Assistance  Division.  Using  appropriate  tools,  microalgae 
were  scraped,  brushed,  or  sucked  from  natural  substrates  in  proportion  to  the  importance  of  those 
substrates  at  each  study  site.  Macroalgae  were  picked  by  hand  in  proportion  to  their  abundance 
at  the  site.  All  collections  of  microalgae  and  macroalgae  were  pooled  into  a  common  container 
and  preserved  with  Lugol's  (IKI)  solution. 

The  samples  were  examined  to  estimate  the  relative  abundance  of  cells  and  rank  by 
biovolume  of  diatoms  and  genera  of  soft  (non-diatom)  algae  according  to  the  method  described 
in  Bahls  (1993).  Soft  algae  were  identified  using  Smith  (1950),  Prescott  (1962,  1978),  John  et  al. 
(2002),  and  Wehr  and  Sheath  (2003).  These  books  also  served  as  references  on  the  ecology  of 
the  soft  algae,  along  with  Palmer  (1969,  1977). 


After  the  identification  of  soft  algae,  the  raw  periphyton  samples  were  cleaned  of  organic 
matter  using  sulfuric  acid,  potassium  dichromate,  and  hydrogen  peroxide.  Then  permanent 
diatom  slides  were  prepared  using  Naphrax''"'^',  a  high  refractive  index  mounting  medium, 
following  Standard  Methods  for  the  Examination  of  Water  and  Wastewater  (APHA  1998).  At 
least  300  diatom  cells  (600  valves)  were  counted  at  random  and  identified  to  species.  The 
following  were  the  main  taxonomic  references  for  the  diatoms:  Krammer  and  Lange-Bertalot 
1986,  1988,  1991a,  1991b;  Lange-Bertalot  1993,  2001;  ICrammer  1997a,  1997b,  2002;  Reichardt 
1997,  1999.  Diatom  naming  conventions  followed  those  adopted  by  the  Integrated  Taxonomic 
Information  System  (http://ww\v. itis.usda.gov).  Van  Dam  et  al.  (1994)  was  the  main  ecological 
reference  for  the  diatoms. 

The  diatom  proportional  counts  were  used  to  generate  an  array  of  diatom  association 
metrics.  A  metric  is  a  characteristic  of  the  biota  that  changes  in  some  predictable  way  with 
increased  human  influence  (Barbour  et  al.  1999).   Diatoms  are  particularly  useful  in  generating 
metrics  because  there  is  a  wealth  of  information  available  in  the  literature  regarding  the  pollution 
tolerances  and  water  quality  preferences  of  common  diatom  species  (e.g.,  Lowe  1974,  Beaver 
1981,  Lange-Bertalot  1996,  Van  Dam  et  al.  1994). 

Values  for  selected  metrics  were  compared  to  biocriteria  (numeric  thresholds)  developed 
for  streams  in  the  Rocky  Mountain  ecoregions  of  Montana  (Table  2).  These  criteria  are  based  on 
metric  values  measured  in  least-impaired  reference  streams  (Bahls  et  al.  1992)  and  metric  values 
measured  in  streams  that  are  known  to  be  impaired  by  various  sources  and  causes  of  pollution 
(Bahls  1993).  The  criteria  in  Table  2  are  valid  only  for  samples  collected  during  the  summer 
field  season  (June  21 -September  21)  and  distinguish  among  four  levels  of  stress  or  impairment 
and  three  levels  of  aquatic  life  use  support:  (1)  no  impairment  or  only  minor  impairment  (full 
support);  (2)  moderate  impairment  (partial  support);  and  (3)  severe  impairment  (nonsupport). 
These  impairment  levels  correspond  to  excellent,  good,  fair,  and  poor  biological  integrity, 
respectively.  Ln  cold,  high-gradient  mountain  streams,  natural  stressors  will  often  mimic  the 
effects  of  man-caused  impainnent  on  some  metric  values. 


Quality  Assurance 

Several  steps  were  taken  to  assure  that  the  study  results  are  accurate  and  reproducible. 
Upon  receipt  of  the  samples,  station  and  sample  attribute  data  were  recorded  in  the  Montana 
Diatom  Database  and  the  samples  were  assigned  a  unique  number,  e.g.,  2954-01 .  The  first  part 
of  this  number  (2954)  designates  the  sampling  site  (Logan  Creek  at  Tally  Lake  Campground) 
and  the  second  part  (01)  designates  the  number  of  periphyton  samples  that  that  have  been 
collected  at  this  site  for  which  data  have  been  entered  into  the  Montana  Diatom  Database. 

Sample  observations  and  analyses  of  soft  (non-diatom)  algae  were  recorded  in  a  lab 
notebook  along  with  information  on  the  sample  label.  A  portion  of  the  raw  sample  was  used  to 
make  duplicate  diatom  slides.     The  slides  used  for  the  diatom  proportional  counts  will  be 
deposited  in  the  Montana  Diatom  Collection  at  the  University  of  Montana  Herbarium  (MONTU) 
in  Missoula.  Duplicate  slides  will  be  retained  by  Hannaea  in  Helena.  Diatom  proportional 
counts  have  been  entered  into  the  Montana  Diatom  Database. 

Results  and  Discussion 

Results  are  presented  in  Tables  3,  4  and  5,  which  are  located  near  the  end  of  this  report 
following  the  references  section.  Appendix  A  contains  a  diatom  report  for  each  sample.    Each 
diatom  report  includes  an  alphabetical  list  of  diatom  species  in  that  sample  and  their  percent 
abundances,  and  values  for  65  different  diatom  metrics  and  ecological  attributes. 


Sample  Notes 

Tally  Lake  Campground.    Fine  particulate  organic  matter  was  very  abundant. 
Numerous  fungal  hyphae  were  present. 

Above  Star  Meadows.  Fine  particulate  organic  mailer  and  fine  inorganic  sediment  were 
both  very  abundant. 


Above  Cyclone  Creek.  Large  amounts  of  fine  particulate  organic  matter  and  fine  to 
medium  inorganic  sediment  were  present.  Macrophytes  and  moss  were  both  present. 


Non-Diatom  Algae  (Table  3) 

Tally  Lake  Campground.  This  site  was  dominated  by  cyanobacteria  with  heterocysts 
(Rivularia  and  Nostoc),  which  are  capable  of  fixing  atmospheric  (molecular)  nitrogen.  The 
abundance  of  these  algae  indicates  probable  nitrogen-limiting  conditions  at  this  site.  The  rare 
and  pollution-sensitive  brown  alga  Heribaudiella  was  abundant  here  and  ranked  third  in 
biovolume,  followed  by  diatoms,  which  were  frequent  and  ranked  fourth  (Table  3).  An 
occasional  red  alga  {Audouinella)  was  found  in  this  sample  but  green  algae  (i.e.,  Stigeoclonium) 
were  rare.  Collectively,  the  non-diatom  algal  assemblage  at  this  site  indicates  cool  flowing 
waters  with  low  nutrient  (especially  nitrogen)  concentrations. 

Above  Star  Meadows.  The  algal  flora  at  this  site  was  similar  to  the  flora  downstream  at 
the  Tally  Lake  Campground,  except  that  one  of  the  dominant  cyanobacteria  here  {Oscillatoria) 
does  not  fix  nitrogen  under  aerobic  conditions.  However,  Nostoc  was  a  co-dominant  at  this  site 
and  this  genus  does  fix  nitrogen.  Diatoms  were  abundant  and  ranked  third  at  this  site,  follov/ed 
by  three  genera  of  green  algae,  which  ranged  in  abundance  from  abundant  {Closterium)  to 
common  (Chaetophoni)  to  rare  {Cosmahum).  Collectively,  the  algae  at  this  site  also  indicate 
cool  flowing  waters  with  low  concentrations  of  inorganic  nutrients. 

Above  Cyclone  Creek.  This  site  was  dominated  by  the  green  alga  Closterium,  the 
chrysophyte  Vaucheria,  and  by  diatoms  (Table  3).  The  cyanobacterium  Oscillatoria  was  also 
abundant  here  and  ranked  fourth.  Green  algae  were  more  common  and  the  number  of  genera  of 
green  algae  (7)  was  much  larger  here  than  at  the  two  downstream  stations.  This,  coupled  with  an 
absence  of  nitrogen-fixing  cyanobacteria,  indicates  elevated  nitrogen  concentrations  compared  to 
the  downstream  sites.  Dominance  by  Vaucheria  indicates  steady  flows  of  cool  waters. 


Diatoms  (Table  4) 

The  12  major  diatom  species  from  Logan  Creek  are  included  in  pollution  tolerance 
classes  3  and  2  and  are  either  sensitive  to  organic  pollution  or  only  somewhat  tolerant  of  organic 
pollution  (Tabic  4).  None  of  the  major  diatom  species  in  Logan  Creek  are  most  tolerant  of 
organic  pollution  (pollution  tolerance  class  =  1). 

Tally  Lake  Campground.  The  most  abundant  diatom  species  at  this  site  were 
Cocconeis  placentula  and  Achnanthidium  mimitissimum  (Table  4).  These  are  both  attached 
species  that  resist  disturbance  and  both  are  sensitive  to  elevated  levels  of  organic  pollution.  The 
third  most  abundant  diatom  at  this  site  (Encyonopsis  krammeri)  is  seldom  reported  from  North 
America  but  also  sensitive  to  organic  pollution.  Overall,  diatom  metrics  indicated  good  diversity 
and  equitability,  low  organic  nutrients,  and  acceptable  sediment  levels  for  a  mountain  stream. 

Only  a  slightly  elevated  percent  abundance  of  the  dominant  species  (C.  placentula) 
indicated  minor  natural  stress  at  this  site.  This  diatom  is  adapted  to  living  attached  to  rocks,  and 
its  dominance  here  is  probably  substrate  related.  Otherwise,  diatom  metrics  indicated  excellent 
biological  integrity  and  full  support  of  aquatic  life  uses.  The  Tally  Lake  site  shared  about  40% 
of  its  diatom  flora  with  the  next  upstream  site  (above  Star  Meadows),  which  indicates  a  minor  to 
moderate  change  in  ecological  conditions  between  the  two  sites. 

Above  Star  Meadows  and  Above  Cyclone  Creek.  These  two  sites  had  virtually 
identical  diatom  floras  (70%  community  similarity)  and  will  be  discussed  together.  A  somewhat 
elevated  percentage  of  motile  diatoms  indicated  minor  impairment  from  sedimentation  at  both 
sites  (Table  4).  Both  sites  also  supported  large  numbers  o{  Achnanthidium  minutissimum,  which 
indicates  minor  physical,  chemical,  or  biological  disturbance.  Such  disturbance  may  be  caused 
by  substrate  scour,  toxic  metals,  and/or  invertebrate  grazing.  Since  no  abnormal  diatom  cells 
were  observed  at  this  site,  metals  toxicity  may  be  ruled  out.  Overall,  diatom  metrics  indicated 
good  diversity  and  equitability,  low  organic  nutrients,  and  the  absence  of  toxic  chemicals.  Other 
than  minor  sedimentation  and  disturbance,  diatom  metrics  indicated  excellent  biological  integrity 


and  full  support  of  aquatic  life  uses  at  both  sites.  The  site  above  Cyclone  Creek  shared  only  38% 
of  its  diatom  flora  with  the  site  at  Tally  Lake  Campground. 


Modal  Categories  (Table  5) 

Several  ecological  attributes  assigned  by  Stevenson  and  Van  Dam  et  al.  (1994)  were 
selected  from  the  diatom  reports  in  the  appendix  and  modal  categories  of  these  attributes  were 
extracted  to  characterize  water  quality  tendencies  in  Logan  Creek  (Table  5). 

The  majority  of  diatoms  at  all  three  sites  on  Logan  Creek  were  non-motile  nitrogen 
autotrophs  that  prefer  fresh  waters  and  low  BOD  levels.  However,  the  modal  category  for 
oxygen  demand  declined  from  "continuously  high"  at  the  upstream  sites  to  "moderate"  at  the 
downstream  site,  indicating  a  decline  in  the  availability  of  dissolved  oxygen.  The  modal 
categories  for  pH  and  trophic  state  also  shifted  from  the  upstream  sites  to  the  downstream  site, 
indicating  significant  increases  in  alkalinity  and  concentrations  of  inorganic  phosphorus  at  Tally 
Lake  Campground. 


References 

APHA.  1998.  Standard  Methods  for  the  Examination  of  Water  and  Wastewater.  20*  Edition.  American  Public 
Health  Association,  Washington,  D.C. 

Bahls,  L.L.    1979.  Benthic  diatom  diversity  as  a  measure  of  water  quality.  Proceedings  of  the  Montana 
Academy  of  Sciences  38:1-6. 

Bahls,  L.L.   1993.  Periphyton  Bioassessment  Methods  for  Montana  Streams  (revised).  Montana  Department  of 
Health  and  Environmental  Sciences,  Helena. 

Bahls,  L.L,  Bob  Bukantis,  and  Steve  Tralles.    1992.  Benchmark  Biology  of  Montana  Reference  Streams.  Montana 
Department  of  Health  and  Environmental  Sciences,  Helena. 

Barbour,  M.T.,  J.  Gemtsen,  B.D.  Snyder,  and  J.B.  Stnbling.   1999.  Rapid  Bioassessment  Protocols  for  Use 
In  Streams  and  Wadeable  Rivers:  Periphyton,  Benthic  Macroinvertebrates  and  Fish.  Second  Edition. 
EPA/841-B-99-002.  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency,  Office  of  Water,  Washington,  D.C. 

Beaver,  Janet.    1981.  Apparent  Ecological  Characteristics  of  Some  Common  Freshwater  Diatoms. 
Ontario  Ministry  of  The  Environment,  Technical  Support  Section,  Don  Mills,  Ontario. 

Hieber,  Maggi,  C.T.  Robinson,  S.  R.  Rushforth,  and  Urs  Uehlinger.  2001.  Algal  communities  associated  with 
different  alpine  stream  types.  Arctic,  Antarctic,  and  Alpine  Research  33(4):447-456. 

Johansen,  J.R.   1999.  Diatoms  of  Aerial  Habitats.  Chapter  12  in  Stoermer,  E.F.,  and  J.P.  Smol  (eds.),  The  Diatoms: 
Applications  For  the  Environmental  and  Earth  Sciences,  Cambridge  University  Press,  New  York. 

John,  D.M.,  B.A.  Whitton,  and  A.J.  Brook  (eds.).  2002.  The  Freshwater  Algal  Flora  of  the  British  Isles:  An 
Identification  Guide  to  Freshwater  and  Terrestrial  Algae.  Cambridge  University 

Karr,  JR.,  and  D.R.  Dudley.    1981.  Ecological  perspectives  on  water  quality  goals.  Environmental  Management 
5:55-69. 

Kawecka,  B.   1990.  The  effect  of  flood-control  regulation  of  a  montane  stream  on  the  communities  of  sessile  algae. 
Acta  Hydrobiology  32:345-354, 

Krammer,  Kurt.    1997a.  Die  cymbelloiden  Diatomeen:  Erne  Monographic  der  weltweit  bekannten  Taxa.  Teil  1. 
AUgemeines  and  Encyonema  Part.  J.  Cramer,  Berlin. 

Krammer,  Kurt.    1997b.  Die  cymbelloiden  Diatomeen:  Bine  Monographic  der  weltweit  bekannten  Taxa.  Teil  2. 
Encyonema  part.,  Encyonopsis  and  Cymbellopsis.  J.  Cramer,  Berlin. 

Krammer,  Kurt.  2002.  Cymbella.  Volume  3  in  Diatoms  of  Europe,  Horst  Lange-Bertalot,  ed.  A.R.G.  Gantner 
Verlag  K.G.,  Germany. 

Krammer,  K.,  and  H.  Lange-Bertalot.    1986.  Bacillariophyceae,  Part  2,  Volume  1:  Naviculaceae.  In  Ettl,  H.,  J 
Gerloff,  H.  Heynig,  and  D.  Mollcnhauer  (eds.).  Freshwater  Flora  of  Middle  Europe.  Gustav  Fischer  Publisher, 
New  York. 

Krammer,  K.,  and  H.  Lange-Bertalot.    1988.  Bacillariophyceae,  Part  2,  Volume  2:  Bacillariaceae,  Epithemiaceae, 
Surirellaceae.  In  Ettl,  H.,  J.  Gerloff  H.  Heynig,  and  D.  Mollenhauer  (eds.),  Freshwater  Flora  of  Middle  Europe. 
Gustav  Fischer  Publisher,  New  York. 


Krammer,  K.,  and  H.  Lange-Bertalot.   1991a.  Bacillariophyceae,  Part  2,  Volume  3:  Centrales,  Fragilanaceae, 
Eunotiaceae.  In  Ettl,  H.,  J.  Gerloff,  H.  Heynig,  and  D.  Mollenhauer  (eds.),  Freshwater  Flora  of  Middle  Europe. 
Gustav  Fischer  Publisher.  Stuttgart. 

Krammer.  K.,  and  H.  Lange-Bertalot.    1991b.  Bacillariophyceae,  Part  2,  Volume  4:  Achnanthaceae,  Critical 

Supplement  to  Navicula  (Lineolatae)  and  Gomphonema,  Complete  List  of  Literature  for  Volumes  1-4.  In  Ettl, 
H.,  G.  Gartner,  J.  Gerloff,  H.  Heynig,  and  D.  Mollenhauer  (eds.).  Freshwater  Flora  of  Middle  Europe.  Gustav 
Fischer  Publisher,  Stuttgart. 

Lange-Bertalot,  Horst.   1979.  Pollution  tolerance  of  diatoms  as  a  criterion  for  water  quality  estimation. 
Nova  Hedwigia  64:285-304. 

Lange-Bertalot,  Horst.   1993.  85  new  taxa  and  much  more  than  100  taxonomic  clarifications  supplementary  to 

Susswasserflora  von  Mitteleuropa  Vol.  2/1-4.  J.  Cramer,  Berlin. 

Lange-Bertalot,  Horst.    1996.  Rote  Liste  der  limnischen  Kieselalgen  (Bacillariophyceae)  Deutschlands.  Schr.-R.  f. 
Vegetationskde.,  H.  28,  pp."  633-677.  BfN,  Bonn-Bad  Godesberg. 

Lange-Bertalot,  Horst.  2001.  Navicula  sensu  stricto:   10  Genera  Separated  from  Navicula  sensu  lato;  Frustulia. 
Volume  2  in  Diatoms  of  Europe,  Horst  Lange-Bertalot,  ed.  A.R.G.  Gantner  Verlag  K.G.,  Germany. 

Lowe,  R.L.   1974.  Environmental  Requirements  and  Pollution  Tolerance  of  Freshwater  Diatoms. 

EPA-670/4-74-005.  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  .-Agency,  National  Environmental  Research  Center, 
Office  of  Research  and  Development,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

McFarland,  B.H.,  B.H.  Hill,  and  W.T.  Willingham.    1997.  Abnormal  Frogilaria  spp.  (Bacillariophyceae) 
In  streams  impacted  by  mine  drainage.  Journal  of  Freshwater  Ecology  12(1);141-149. 

NichoUs,  K.H.,  and  D.E.Wujek.  2003.  Chrysophycean  Algae.  Chapter  12  (pp.  471-509)  m  Wehr,  J.D.,  and  R.G. 
Sheath  (eds.).  Freshwater  Algae  of  North  America:  Ecology  and  Classification.  Academic  Press,  New  York. 

Palmer,  CM.   1969.  A  composite  rating  of  algae  toleratmg  organic  pollution.  Journal  of  Phycology  5:78-82. 

Palmer,  CM.   1977.  Algae  and  Water  Pollution:  .An  Illustrated  Manual  on  the  Identification,  Significance,  and 
Control  of  Algae  in  Water  Supplies  and  in  Polluted  Water.  EPA-600/9-77-036. 

Plafkin,  J.L.,  M.T.  Barbour,  K.D.  Porter,  S.K.  Gross,  and  R.M.  Hughes.   1989.  Rapid  Bioassessment  Protocols  for 
Use  in  Rivers  and  Streams:  Benthic  Macro  invertebrates  and  Fish.  EPA  440-4-89-001 . 

Prescott,  G.W.   1962.  Algae  of  the  Western  Great  Lakes  Area.  Wm.  C  Brown  Company,  Dubuque,  Iowa. 

Prescott,  G.W.   1978.  How  to  Know  the  Freshwater  Algae.  Third  Edition.  Wm.  C.  Brown  Company  Publishers, 

Dubuque,  Iowa. 

Reichardt,  Erwin.    1997.  Ta.xonomische  Revision  des  Artenkomplexes  um  Gomphonema  pumilum 
(Bacillariophyta).  Nova  Hedwigia  65(1-4)  :99-129. 

Reichardt,  Erwin.    1999.  Zur  Revision  der  Gattung  Gowp/iowema.   .A.. R.G.  Ganmer  Verlag,  Distributed  by  Koeltz 
Scientific  Books,  Komgstein,  Germany. 

Renfro,  H.B.,  and  D.E.  Feray.    1972.  Geological  Highway  Map  of  the  Northern  Rocky  Moimtain  Region. 
American  Association  of  Petroleum  Geologists,  Tulsa,  Oklahoma. 


11 


• 


Smith,  G.M.    1950.  The  Fresh-Water  Algae  of  The  United  States.  McGraw-Hill  Book  Company,  New  York. 

Stevenson,  R.J.,  and  Y.  Pan.   1999.  Assessing  Environmental  Conditions  in  Rivers  and  Streams  with 
Diatoms.  Chapter  2  in  Stoermer,  E.F.,  and  J. P.  Smol  (eds.),  The  Diatoms:  Applications  For  the 
Environmental  and  Earth  Sciences,  Cambridge  University  Press,  New  York. 

Stewart,  W.D.P.,  P.  Rowell,  and  A.N.  Rai.   1980.  Symbiotic  Nitrogen-Fixing  Cyanobacteria.  Pp.  239-277  in 
Stewart,  W.D.P.,  and  J.  Gallo  (eds.).  Nitrogen  Fixation,  Academic  Press,  New  York. 

USDA.   1976.  Climax  Vegetation  of  Montana  (map).  U.S.  Department  of  Agriculture,  Soil  Conservation  Service, 
Cartographic  Unit,  Portland. 

USEPA.  2000.  Level  III  Ecoregions  of  the  Continental  United  States  (map).  National  Health  and  Environmental 
Effects  Research  Laboratory,  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency,  Corvallis,  Oregon. 

Van  Dam,  Herman,  Adrienne  Mertens,  and  Jos  Sinkeldam.    1994.  A  coded  checklist  and  ecological  Indicator  values 
of  freshwater  diatoms  from  The  Netherlands.  Netherlands  Journal  of  Aquatic  Ecology  28(1):1 17-133. 

Weber,  C.I.  (ed.).   1973.  Biological  Field  and  Laboratory  Methods  for  Measuring  the  Quality  of  Surface 
Waters  and  Effluents.  EPA-670 '4-73-001.  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency,  National 
Environmental  Research  Center,  Office  of  Research  and  Development,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Wehr,  J. D,  and  R.G.  Sheath.  2003.   Freshwater  Algae  of  North  America;  Ecology  and  Classification.  Academic 
Press,  New  York. 

Whittaker,  R.H.   1952.  A  study  of  summer  foliage  insect  communities  in  the  Great  Smoky  Mountains. 
Ecological  Monographs  22:1-44. 

Woods,  A.  J.,  Omemik,  J.M.,  Nesser,  J.  A.,  Shelden,  J.,  and  S.H.  Azevedo.    1999.  Ecoregions  of  Montana  (color 
poster  with  map),  U.S.  Geological  Survey,  Reston,  Virginia. 


12 


o 
O 


ro 

c 
ra 

c 
o 


ro 

c 

<D 
0) 

o 

c 

03 
CD 
O 


C 

o 
l/> 
c 
g 

ro 

c 
■q. 

E 
ro 
</) 

c 
o 

g. 

0) 
Q. 

o 

UJ 

Q 


c 
g 

ro 
u 
o 


ro 


0) 

ro  Q 


c 
o 


13 


"3  „,  >- 

QJ  ^  CD 

g  E  E 

3~  W  Z 


^  o  1^ 

ro  y  "o 

5  ro  o 

-tr:  rn  '^ 
O 


W 


C 

o 


ro 

CO 


ro 
0 

CO 

0 

TO 

00 
g 

ri 

r^ 

ri 

CD 

m 


o 
O 

o 
o 

_l 
a> 
o 
U 


T3 

C 

O 


6 

c 
ro 
en 
o 


^ 

in 

in 

in 

en 

O) 

<N 

CNJ 

O 

o 

z 

O 

O 

_j 

05 
O 
O 


O) 

(/) 

Q. 

5 

E 

0 

ro 

ro 

0 

<u 

0 

2 

^ 

t_ 

ro 

ro 

_j 

>> 

CO 

(U 

"ro 

> 

1- 

0 

ro 

0) 
0) 

CJ 

c 
ro 
en 
o 


ro 

o 

CT) 
ro 


'a- 
in 

in 

ro 

CM 

05 

00 

00 

00 

CD 

in 

CT) 
CM 


ro 
o 
O 

Z 

o 
o 

_l 

CJ5 

o 
O 


(D 
CJ 

c 

O 

> 

o 

-Q 

ro 

<D 
0) 

O 

c 
ro 
en 
o 


# 


en 

0) 


cn 

E 

c 
nj 

C 

3 
O 

£ 


o 

0) 
> 

en 

c 


>>  0) 

en  o 

C  C 

s  </>■ 


o 
> 


TO     ro 

E    - 


-    o 
c    a 


5i   SS 
ro    (D 

CO    b 


£      O     05 

^  a)    u 

"C! 
(D 


CL    E 


1/5 

<D 

"O 
Q) 
O 
0) 
CL 
X 
0) 


O     3 

(/)     TO 
TO     > 


E 
o 


C 
O 

>^ 

c 

TO 


en 

c 


• 


o  g 

CD  ° 

to     05  dJ 

Q    §  ;E 


E^ 

o    i^ 

5  o 


o 

CD 
CL 

CO 


(D 

O 

C 

in 

ro 

X 

rj 

(D 

1 — 

T3 

3 

C 

Q 


c  „ 

o  X 

—  0) 

i5  -o 

:=  C 

c/5  — 


c 

O  <-i 
=      X 


X  .— , 

0)  c 

X3  O 

c  c 

~  c 

>>  TO 

> 


Q 


in 

CL  C 

^  o 

o  O 


LD 
CM 
V 


in 

V 


o 
rsi 

V 


A 


^ 

2^ 

O) 

CO 

0) 

0) 

I— 

o 

c 

c 

c 

o 

o 

r 
o 

0) 

CL 

::3 

CL 

E 

c 

0) 

Q. 

3 

en 
o 

TO 

CO 

"53 

CO 

o 

Q. 

0) 

o 

— 

E 

(/) 

X 

3 

CD 

3 

LJJ 

LL 

CO 

en 

V 

CT) 

o 

O 

d 

CO 

A 

05 

csi 


Ln 

CM 


CD 


in 

CM 


CD 

n 


o 

CM 


en 

CD 


o 
o 


'* 

t^ 


o 


o 


ai 
in 


o 


CD 
CD 


o 
o 


"D  r-- 

+ 
o 

C3 

CD 

rIan 
199 

CD 
to 
CO 

ai 

CO 

CO 

0) 

A 

t5^ 

ci 

c3 

c 

en 

A 


A 


en 

Ln 

A 


o 
o 


CD 

O 

CD 

CN 

o 

CM 

A 

6 

CD 

V 

CN 

T— 

CD 

o 

o  2? 

CD 
O 

0) 

CO 
CO 

t_ 

1 

CO     (0 

o 

b 

CO   J. 

in 

_c 

0) 

1 

CD 
1-    CD 

o 

OJ 

3  en 

CD 

C/5 

o  ^ 

o 

CO 

JD 

CD 

CO     CO 

C3 

o 

CQ  -r. 

O 

c 

CO 
CD 

cn 


CO 
CO 


en 

cn 


CO 

m 


o 

c 


o 

-a  CO 

o  _ 

o  3 

O  u- 


0) 

o 

TO 

1— 
CD 
X3 

o 

CL 
CL 
3 
C/) 

CD 

0) 
> 
CD 

o 

CL 
CL 

CD 
U 

c 

2 

"CQ 

C/5 

3 

CD 

\_ 

t 

O 

C 

CO 

CO 

o 

o 

(U 

LL 

CL 

CL 

z 

[T 

+ 
o 
o 
in 

CD 

o 


CD 

CO 

t^ 

en 

CD 

CD 

+ 

o 
o 

1/1 

in 

CO 

CD 

CD 

CQ 

CO 

CD 
_3 

CO 
> 


CD 

en 

c 

CO 


+ 

CD 

q 

C/5 

ci 

CO 

CD 

CD 

CD 

c 

o 

o 

CO 

en 

o 

CD 

o 

cn 

o 

o 

CD 

q 

C/) 

CD 

cn 

CNJ 

C\i 

cn 

^'~ 

CO 

(D 

rsi 

^ 

1 
o 

.^^ 

to 

CD 

O 

A 

q 

LO 

V 

^ 

o 

CD 

rsj 

■^' 

CO 
CD 

^ 

Q 

CD 
c/) 
CO 
0) 

CJ 

CD 

Q 


CD 
c/) 
CO 
0) 

O 
(D 
Q 


CD 
c/) 

c 
o 

CL 
CO 

CD 

TD 
Q) 
O 
CD 
Q. 
X 

UJ 


CD 

CO 

> 

o 
o 

CO 


0) 
u 

o 
o 


CO 

0) 

o 

0) 
Ci 

cn 

E 
o 

TO 
TD 

C 

o 

E 

E 
o 
o 

0) 


'-^  CO 

CD  = 

1^  CD 

CD  -b 


O 
CD 

■c 

CD 
CD 

I 

CD 

cn 

c 

CO 

"D 
CD 

C 


CO 

.£ 

CO 

.03 
.2  I 


3 
00 

■D 

C 
CO 


CD 

C 
CO 

-S 

o 


c 

3 
O 

o 

Id 
c 
o 
t 
o 

CL 

o 


(D 

x: 


cn 


C 
0} 

e 

'x> 

0) 


0) 


3 


in 
0) 
</) 
(0 

o 

_c 

(U 

4— • 

CO 

l_ 

0) 
T3 
O 

E 


(3) 


c 
o 

CL 

cn 

CD 


cn 

E 

CO 
CD 


o 

X3 


CO 


gi  CO 


cn    ^ 

CD    ro 
cn    CD 
0 
o 


c 

CO 
0) 

o 

c 
o 


E 
>^ 

c 
o 

c    5. 
CD     tn 


CD  o  c: 

O  .  3 

H-  c  o 

°  0  E 

CD  CO  C 


en 

CD 


cn 


o 

CD 
CL 
CO 

£      CO 


o 

Q. 


CD     CO 

E  ^ 

CO 

c 


E 1 

11 


CO 

E 

o 
c 
n 

CD 


u-  o 


O     TD 


c 

1^ 

CD   cn 

c    ■^ 

O      1- 


c 
o 


cn 

CD 

o 

<^    S 
cn    to 

CD    "o 

^     c 


cn 
u 

CD 
CL 

cn 


5 

CD 

E 
o 
cn 

CD 

in 

CO 
CD 

\ 

o 

c 

CD 


!    E 
o 

CD 

c 


CD  = 
JZ  3 
■"      O 


ll 

o  5 

CL    , , 

CD    i2 


OJ      CO 

o 


o    o 


_    c 

CD      CD 


E 
3 
c 


CD 
O 

c 

O      CD 


c 
o 

T3  ^ 

CD  CD 

cn  cn 

CD  CO 

CQ  CQ 


•a 

c 
3 

_  CD     JD 

n    ■=:    -c    CD 


0 

CL 


cn 

a  o 

E  E 

o  3 

O  C/3 


CD 
> 

"O 

c 

CD 

in 
cn 
CD 

c 

SI 

o 


x:     >- 
•5    cn 

o 

CD 

CD      <D      CL 
Q.    O    Cfl 

D       r^       CO 


S  5 

u    i5 


o 

(D 

&_ 

Q> 

c 

c 

CO 

<D 

T3 

O) 

C 

3 

(0 

CO 

^^ 

II 

(0 

CO 

x: 

-i-T 

Q. 

c 

g 

CO 

'i_ 

c 

JO 

E 

o 

(0 

o 

m 

II 

c 

■o 

o 

en 

cri 

> 

o 

b 

o 

CN 

03 

c 

E 

ji: 

o 

0 

O 

15 

■o 

(J 

**_ 

c 

o 

CD 

<D 

O) 

E 

O 

_1 

3 

o 

E 

> 

o 

o 

L- 

-Q 

•o 

ai 

>< 

0 

I- 

CO 

-G 

o 

J£ 

_Q) 

II 

c 

(0 

O 

I— 

I- 

o 

-  - 

"co 

cu 

CO 

c 
g 

CO 

o 

T3 

o 

Q. 

E 

CO 

■o 

«3 

o 

c 

c 

o 

n> 

o 

II 

JO 

>. 

o 

o 

.9- 

c 

o 

a5 

o 
E 

O 

c 

CO 

c 

E 

o 
u 

"a 

CO 

II 
o 

3 

CO 

^ 

E 

^ 

CO 

c 

<B 

o 

a; 

> 

ro 

O" 

"cD 

T3 

0) 

0) 

tz 

■^ 

tr 

o 

c 

II 

CO 

CO 

j<: 

(D 

0) 

ro 

6 

o 

Q) 

O 

2 

5 

O 

^ 

o 

O 

_l 
en 

0) 

o 

> 

O 

o 

CO 

CM 

O 

U 

2 

2 

o 

CO 

o 

CO 

_J 

03 

o 

> 

o 

o 

-Q 

< 

3 

CT  O 

E^ 

Q)    _| 

-■  O 


c 

CO 
"D 

c 

15 
XJ 
CO 


CO 

s 

c 

CO 

IT)  t:- 

c 

o 

CO 

c 

T— 

£^    o 

g 

E 

CO 

"S 

^    E 

CO 

o 

E 

E 

CD 

c^  E 

o 

o 

o 
o 
o 

I— 

£   o 

o 
o 

o 

■o 

"^    o 

CNJ     T- 

c    c 

CO     CO 


E 
o 


CO 


^ 

CvJ 

^— 

Id 

il 

i3 

c 

c 

c 

o 

CO 

CD 

c 

c 

(/} 

CD 

"e 

"e 

O 

o 

o 

o 

o 

-a 

-a 

c 
g 
'oi 
CO 

u 

o 
o 


u 

(0 

n 
o 
c 
rj 
>> 
u 

a  :s 
o   o 

u 


o 

to    u 

O     (/) 

2  O 


5 


0) 


■a 


9? 
To 
c 
o 
« 

CD 
O 
O 

o 


Oi 

c 

CD 

c 

E 
o 
•a 


CO 

::i 

c 

CO 

c 

E 
o 

T3 


in 


i  2 

JO 
CO 


CO 

c 

CD 

"o        in 

c 

X3 
(D 


CO 


CO 

c 

CD 

c 

3 
XJ 
CD 


C 

a- 

cu 


0) 

(0 

c 

0) 

<u 

1- 

en  (Q 

"  2 
>•  a 

Q.  -kw 
O  0) 
1-     fO 

o  j; 


c   t 


<?  .5 


-    ft 


o 
o 


s 

3     C 


O    i^  CO 
O     O     i; 


0) 

tz 
O) 

<? 

c 
dl 

0) 

k_ 

O) 

I 

_o 

9  " 
I/)  ■-. 


o 


o 


2 


o 

c 

^-^ 

o 

!Z 

CO 

O 

Ol 

E 

E 

CC 

o 

0 

*- 

c 

nj 

ro 

5 

o 

ic 

b 

a(br 
/o//a 

<B 

ti 

>> 

o 

Q. 

H- 

o 

0 

o 

E 

ca 

3 

a. 

CO 

2 

• 


o    .  . 

"*"      1/5 

O    0)  o 


■53    «    CO 

E 


(/) 

^  —  ?^ 
.2   E  ~ 

(5     03 
O    ^ 


in 

0) 

U)    "O     03 
TO     C     03 


E 
o 


1/3     <D 

.     9J     TO 


■^  CO 

T3  > 

"O  -o 

flj  03 

o  .£ 

03  t: 

"03  CU 

U3  "O 

o  =)    o 

<n  .  SI 

05  CO    _ 

D  O    ^ 

TO  <=>  E 

>  rsi    «5 

?  ^"S 

.5?  O  -5 

^  S  i 

Q.  CO      ^ 

CO  5    (/) 

7D  ir     03 
"O     CO 


.H,    03 


CO 

E 


03 
O 

c 

CD 

•a 

c 
:3 

CO 

"c 

03 
U 

\_ 
03 
Q. 


l/>    ^    ^ 


(0 


TO 
CJ 

O 

TD 
05 

I-  . — * 

CO  -r; 

rl 

O  C13 

O  03 

C  ^ 

^  O 

1/1  a> 

05  o 

</3  Q. 

^  O 

—  c 

O  CO 

2"  ra 

CO  >- 

O  TO 

■C  CI 

O  03 

1^ 

T3  05 

t^  W 
(/3 

i:  05 

'^  5 

O  CO 

<^  t- 

5i  c 


E? 

CD    ■" 

(/)    in 


o  ^ 
£^  > 

03     O 

a.  n 


C  CD 

—  05 

(/)  i: 

03  (/) 

3 


C 
TO 

C 
D 
O 

E 


tfi 

So 


CO  O 
00  :=! 


en 
03 
(J 
05 

C2. 


CJ>    -^    OD 

0  r^  t^ 

oj 

CNI 

in 

•* 

00 

CNJ 

CD 

,-  ,-  0 

^ 

n 

n 

in 

CO 

0 

n 

t£> 

0    "* 
CN    T- 

CD 

CN 

(.'5 

10    CD 

OO 

-^ 

CD    CD    h-    CO    CD 
■>*    CNJ    CX3    r-    CM 


CO 
CNI 
CO 
CO 


CD 
CNJ 


^-  -^  -^  CN  cn  in 
^  CO  en  CD  in  CM 

CD    CnI    C\i    CD    CO    T- 


COCOrOOOCMCOCMCNCOCOCOCO 


5 

3 

(J 

c 

05 

I- 

is 

s  s 

c   c 

<TJ     CO 

c  c 
■c  ^ 
o    o 


3 

<B  O 

.!2  S 

0)  „ 


3  « 

o  t 

■S  E 

05  C 


c 
o 
o 
o 
o 
O  Q 


to 

ft 

1/) 
Q. 

05 

0 

c 

c 

0 

0 

ni 


u   o 

c   c 
UJ  UJ 


<B 

c 

O     05 

■c  5 

m     3 

^    o 

03-5 
it  S 


m     m    -3 


3    cfl 

11 

to   .^ 


to 

c 

05 

3 

w. 

tn 

<«- 

t/) 

to 

c- 

3 

0 

c 

13 

tfl 

in 

IT) 

1- 

C" 

ifl 

o> 

u 

E 

3 

to 

^    CO  CJ3 

;5t  OJ  CO 

CD 

■q-  CNJ 


o 
o 


r--  o 

CD    00 


CD 


jn  CO  CNJ  in  CO 
^  tn  r2  °o  "^  ^ 

'^  CO  cNi  2:  2  j:' 


0)    >> 


1/) 


Q:  CO 


c 

3  _ 

o  o> 

O  > 

«  tfl 

O  05 

05  o     X 

Q.  «     05 

(/)  Q.-0 

'-(/)£ 

2  ^  = 

«  o   o 

t  CO    = 

z  (/)  a. 


X 

05 

■o 

c 


I/) 

0) 

o 

05 

a 

C 

to 

c 


05  C 

o  o 

C  Q 

to  .  . 


c 

0) 

o 

*-        (A        ^ 

—    .-     0) 

w  Q  a. 


05 

o 

"io 
E"x 

II 

<   >. 

05    ^ 
Q.    CO 


0) 

03  -^ 

c"  U, 

03  C 

Q.  <" 

E  *" 

1/3  CO 

to  i-T 

.£  § 

TO  II 

"cO  CNJ 

05  iJ- 


c 

05 
O 

CD 


O     S 


03  — 

I  i 

™  II 

J/3 
"Q5 

0  CD 

—  cn 


o 

05 

o 
E 

O 

O 
CO 


1/3 
e/) 
CO 


CD 

05 
!33 
_CD 

E 

05 

in 

t/3 
CD 

E 
o 

TO 

■o 

05 


T3 
05 

CD 
13. 

E 
o 

CJ 

c 
0 

SI 

5 

cnT 
in 

CJ3 


05 
:^ 

CO 


o  =^ 


0 

05 

>. 

u 

CJ 

■^ 

0 

c 

_CD 

CO 

CO 

</> 

03 

E 

05 

0 

CO 

0 
05 
t3. 
t/3 

H 

>< 

c 
.0 

c 

C 

D 

0 

E 

^ 

E 

0 

0 

E 

TO 

ro 

a. 

0 

t/3 

ri 

"u 

0 

E 

t_ 

•*--' 

CO 

0 

c 

c 

05 

CD 

E 

CD 

05 
0 

I- 
"00 

< 

0 

05 
Q. 

C^ 

ID 

0) 
(D 

U 

c 
o 


o 

0) 
CL 
(/) 

E 
o 

TO 


Q) 
J3 


CO 
O 

_o 

O 
O 
(U 

"O 
0) 

"o 


to 
OJ 

O 
CD 

B 
TO 
O 

TO 
"O 
O 


^ 

OJ 

Q) 

CO 

o 

o 

(D 

O 

C 

z 

O 

O 

o 

O 

o 

CJ) 

(U 

o 

> 
o 

O 

JD 

< 

to 

5 

o 

"D 
TO 
(D 

CSJ 

o 
O 

2 

Z 

o 

ro 

o 

CO 

CD 

(D 

o 

> 

O 

O 

-Q 

< 

"D 

C 

3 

o 

en 

o 

Q. 

U 

E 

z 

ro 
U 

o 

0) 

_i 

-^ 

O) 

ro 

o 

_i 

U 

^ 

ro 

1- 

B 

3 

-Q 

■\__ 

< 

"S 

o 

"ot 

o 

o 

o 

LU 

^■^ 


CO 

Q) 

C 

E 

O 

b 


CO 
0 


x: 

O) 

w 

x: 
en 

X 

CL 

kz 

C/3 

^ 

o 

OJ 

c 

o 

TO 

0! 

O 

CD 

ZJ 

3 

(D 

1— 
O 

c 

< 

O 

'.^- 

c 

o 
O 

3 

0) 

c 

C/) 

2  ^ 

E 

V— 

2 

Z) 

o 

LL 

u 


•y>   CD 


CL  -^ 
O     0) 


o  i::: 


<  -2 


x: 

en 

X 

m 

>< 

o 

(/5 

c 

D 

CD 

O 

CD 

D 

o 

C 

C 

o 

O 

^■^ 


w 

!E 

Q. 

"to 


CO 

a> 


05 

CD 

CO 

Q. 

'sz 

o 

O 
O 

CD 

'c 

CD 
CD 

3     <B 
<     O 


0) 

■♦-• 

0) 
T3 
O 


cn 

O 
XI 

o 

k_ 
Cl 
CO 

en 
o 
(/) 


TO 

"55 


CO 

o 

X3 

o 

Q. 
CD 
t/5 
O 

CD 


(U 
X3 


CO 

O 
X3 

O 

u. 
Q. 
CO 
CO 
O 
CO 
CD 


X) 


_5) 

X3 
CD 

1 

CD 

> 


XI 
CD 

1 

CD 
> 


C 

Q. 

-♦-• 
LU 


X 
Cl 


(0 

X) 

c 

CO 

Q. 

E 

3 

Q 

■> 

c 

CD 

c 

CD 

(U 

[c 

o 

95 

t— 

>» 

"cD 

X 

W 

iz 

O 

X5 
O 

a. 

(0 

V) 


S 

s 

CO 
o 
x: 

CL 

o 


c 

g 

CO 

o 

'c 

Z) 

E 

E 

o 

o 

s 

O) 

'■a 

>i 

■^ 

q3 

> 

'c 

3 

S 

ro 

CO 

c 

CO 

CT 

x: 

o 

^ 

c 

o 

•^ 

(/) 

CD 

c 

CD 

0 

X— 

> 

CD 

ro 

CO 

q3 

c 

CD 

E 

^> 

CD 

q: 

Q 

c 

1— ! 

CD 

Q 

>