Skip to main content

Full text of "The biology of Stentor"

See other formats


INTERNATIONAL  SERIES  OF  MONOGRAPHS  ON 
PURE  AND  APPLIED  BIOLOGY 

Division:  ZOOLOGY 

General  Editor:  G.  A.  Kerkut 


Volume  5 


THE    BIOLOGY   OF    STENTOR 


OTHER  TITLES  IN  THE  SERIES  ON  PURE  AND 
APPLIED  BIOLOGY 


ZOOLOGY  DIVISION 

Vol.  1.  Raven   —  An  Outline  of  Developmental  Physiology 

Vol.  2.  Raven  — Morphogenesis:  The  Analysis  of  Molluscan  Development. 

Vol.  3.  Savory — Instinctive  Living. 

Vol.  4.   Kerkut —  Implications  of  Evolution. 

Vol.  6.  Jenkin  —  Animal  Hormones. 

Vol.  7.  Corliss —  The  Ciliated  Protozoa. 

Vol.  8.   George —  The  Brain  as  a  Computer. 


BIOCHEMISTRY  DIVISION 

Vol.   1.  Pitt-Rivers  and  Tata —  The  Thyroid  Hormones. 
Vol.  2.   Bush  —  Chromatography  of  Steroids. 


BOTANY   DIVISION 

Vol.  1.  BoR  —  Grasses  of  Burma,  Ceylon,  India  and  Pakistan. 

Vol.  2.  TuRRiLL  (Ed.)  -^  Vistas  in  Botany. 

Vol.  3.   ScHULTES  —  Native  Orchids  of  Trinidad  and  Tobago. 

Vol.  4.  CooKE  —  Cork  and  the  Cork  Tree. 


MODERN   TRENDS 
IN   PHYSIOLOGICAL   SCIENCES    DIVISION 

Vol.   1   Florkin  —  Unity  and  Diversity  in  Biochemistry. 

Vol.  2.  Bracket —  The  Biochemistry  of  Development. 

Vol.  3.  Gerebtzoff  —  Cholinesterases. 

Vol.  4.  Brouha  —  Physiology  in  Industry. 

Vol.  5.  B acq  and  Alexander  —  Fundamentals  of  Radiobiology. 

Vol.  6.  Florkin  (Ed.)  —  Aspects  of  the  Origin  of  Life. 

Vol.  7.  Hollaender  (Ed.)  —  Radiation  Protection  and  Recovery. 

Vol.  8.   Kayser  —  The  Physiology  of  Natural  Hibernation. 

Vol.   9.   Francon  —  Progress  in  Microscopy. 
Vol.   10.  Charlier  —  Coronary  Vasodilators. 
Vol.  1 1 .  Gross  —  Oncogenic  Viruses. 
Vol.  12.   Mercer  —  Keratin  and  Keratinization. 
Vol.  13,   Heath  —  Organophosphorus  Poisons. 


c« 

'■r. 

V 

i^ 

■t-T 

a 

^ 

•  -. 

(/J 

;S 

ri 

•^ 

o 

2i 

j: 

Oh 
72 

i 

bf, 

"^ 

1> 

~- 

1) 

c 

r^ 

t? 

3 

■"^ 

^ 

X 

-u 

bf 

"^ 

i 

^ 

£ 

s~C 

h  c  c  u: 


03 

_-M     ^ 

:i 

C 

>       >-. 

>C' 

C 

o 

-     -^ 

■^ 

c 

C     ir" 

"^ 

1> 

JZ     ^ 

c« 

r>  c; 

^^ 

;^- 

1^ 

^ 

o 

^ 

•  5f 

■iJ 

11 

^ 

1 " 

"^ 

o 

^.2 

■^ 

o 

^^ 

•& 

1 

•  c 

C 

u 

_  !^ 

0 

g 

0 

tj  Jt 

■^ 

U 

^c 

1 

U 

Si^ 

<i 

u 

^■§ 

<i" 

w 

•o    Ji 

>5 

Oh 

-S 

C/2 

"C  '" 

i^ 

S  c 

1 

h 

:S| 

z 

^« 

O 

C' 

X 
U. 

&  2i 

THE  BIOLOGY  OF 

STENTOR 


BY 


VANCE  TARTAR 

Department  of  Zoology 
University  of  Washington 


PERGAMON    PRESS 

OXFORD   •    LONDON   •    NEW  YORK   ■    PARIS 

1961 


I'I'UCAIVION    IM<i:SS   l/l'I). 

Heading  ton  Hill  Hall,  Oxford 

I  &  5  I'il'^-roy  Siiimrr,  London  11'./ 

iM':u(;aivi()N  pki.ss  inc. 

122  luisl  SS'li  StrrrI,  Nnu    Vorii  ;,'..',  A^.  V. 

Stdlln   ('enter  O/o,  ()<><>  Wihhire  Ihntleiuml 

Los  /hif^eles  17,  (California 

IM'IUCAMON    I'KI'SS,   S.A.R.I,. 
..'  /  line  (les  L'eoles,  Paris  I  '' 

IMCUCAMON    I'KI'SS  (J.m.h.ll. 
Kaiserstrassv  7^'j,  Frati/ijurt  am  Main 


(\>pyrij^lit  (C)    \i)()\ 
I'l'lUiJAMON    I'hhss    In<'. 


Lihiiuy  <>1  ( 'oii^Mcs.s  ( 'iird  No.  f)0    i57'4 


Sil  in  hnfuint   11  nn  i.'pt.  <in<l  I'tinttd  in  (hinl  IUil(nn  tit 

nil':  MAY  rRi;!-;  pki:ss,  s  ri;vi;N  aci: ,  iiiiicrs. 


PREFACE 

In  this  monograph  I  have  attempted  to  summarize  all  that  has 
been  learned  about  a  certain  group  of  ciliate  protozoa  pre- 
eminently suitable  for  class-room  study  and  research.  To  this  end 
1  have  tried  conscientiously  to  review  all  the  literature  of  Stentor 
so  that  the  reader  will  need  to  turn  to  original  sources  only  for 
minor  details.  A  few  publications  were  not  available  to  me  though 
I  had  reports  of  their  contents,  and  these  are  so  indicated  in  the 
bibliography.  Many  points  I  have  been  able  to  substantiate 
myself,  and  I  have  taken  this  opportunity  to  include  previews  of 
work  in  progress  and  miscellaneous  observations  from  my  own 
experience  with  these  ciliates. 

Naturally  I  am  keenly  aware  of  our  indebtedness  to  all  who 
have  labored  in  this  field  and  of  my  responsibility  for  reporting 
their  studies  accurately  and  commenting  upon  them  fairly.  When 
I  use  the  words  ''seem"  and  ''apparently"  with  their  goading 
provisionality,  this  is  not  in  derogation  of  a  fine  piece  of  work  but 
simply  means  that  confirmation  of  results  assures  a  firm  basis  for 
further  investigation.  It  is  often  surprising  what  differences  may 
appear  in  both  procedure  and  interpretation  when  different 
individuals  undertake  the  same  problem  or  even  the  same  approach. 
On  the  other  hand,  there  has  been  unnecessary  duplication  of 
effort  for  lack  of  a  comprehensive  review  as  here  attempted,  and 
I  have  myself  been  at  fault  in  this  regard.  Studies  in  which 
Stentor  appears  as  suitable  material  in  a  wider  context  —  frequently 
biochemical  —  may  also  be  led  astray  because  investigators  are 
not  aware  of  relevant  aspects  of  the  biology  of  this  animal  which 
are  crucial  for  proper  interpretations.  I  hope  to  have  provided 
the  basis  or  background  for  extensive  further  researches. 

The  illustrations  from  my  own  studies  do  not  represent  general 
conceptions  but  specific  cases  drawn  from  laboratory  records. 
Therefore  they  offer  the  basis  for  different  interpretations,  if  these 
need  be  made,  as  well  as  suggesting  many  directions  for  further 
study. 


VI  PREFACE 

I  wish  to  thank  Dr.  Gerald  Kerkut  for  proposing  this  book, 
and  the  pubUshers  for  their  care  in  its  reaUzation.  Emogean 
Saunders  Tartar,  my  wife,  prepared  the  manuscript.  My  own 
studies  have  been  generously  supported  by  the  American  Cancer 
Society  and,  currently,  by  our  National  Institutes  of  Health. 

Vance  Tartar 
Aquaterre 

Nahcotta,  Washington 
U.S.A. 


CONTENTS 


Preface         

I    Introduction 
II    Form  and  Function  in  Stentor 

III  Behavior 

1.  Food  selection 

2.  Swimming 

3.  Avoiding  reaction  and  learning 

4.  Response  to  light 

5.  Response  to  heat  and  electric  current 

6.  The  question  of  sensory  cilia     .  . 

7.  Cystment .  . 

IV  Fine  Structure 

1.  Feeding  organelles 

(a)  Frontal  field 

(b)  Oral  pouch 

(c)  Membranellar  band 

(d)  Gullet         

2.  Holdfast    .  . 

3.  Cytopyge 

4.  Contractile  vacuole 

5.  Cortical  structure 

(a)  The  cell  surface    .  . 

(b)  Granular  stripes;   nature   of  the  pigment  and 

granules.  . 

(c)  Clear  stripes  and  their  fiber  systems 

(d)  Fiber  systems  of  doubtful  status 

(e)  The  cilia    .  . 

6.  Fine  structure  of  the  nuclei 

7.  The  endoplasm    .  . 

V    Grov^th  and  Division 

1.  Growth     .  . 

2.  The  course  of  normal  division  .  . 

3.  Nature  and  location  of  the  fission  line 

4.  Incitement  to  division    .  . 

5.  Persistence  of  division    .  . 


PAGE 
V 


II 
II 
17 
19 
22 
24 

25 

26 


28 
28 
29 
29 

30 

34 
37 
40 
40 
42 
42 

43 
49 
54 
56 
57 
58 

61 
61 
67 

75 
81 

84 


Vll 


Vlll 


CONTENTS 


(a) 
(b) 
(c) 
(d) 
(e) 


VI    Reorganization      .  .         .  .         .  .         . .         .  .         .  .  91 

1 .  The  course  of  reorganization     .  .           .  .                       .  .  91 

2.  Analysis  of  the  reorganization  process .  .  94 

3.  Stimulus  to  reorganization  and  the  significance  of  this 
process        .  .           .  .          .  .          .  .           .  .           .  .  98 

To  replace  defective  mouthparts?           .  .  98 

Response  to  change  in  the  medium?      .  .           .  .  99 

Need  for  nuclear  reorganization?            .  .          .  .  loi 

For  growth  of  the  adoral  band? .  .           .  .          .  .  loi 

Need  for  adjustment  of  nuclear  dimensions?     .  .  102 

VII    Regeneration          .  .          .  .          .  .          . .          . .          . .  105 

1 .  The  course  of  regeneration        .  .          .  .           .  .          .  .  105 

(a)  Oral  regeneration  and  its  requirements              .  .  105 

(b)  Regeneration  of  the  holdfast       .  .                        .  .  no 

(c)  Reconstitution  of  the  normal  shape        .  .           .  .  in 

2.  Nuclear  behavior  during  regeneration .  .           ..          ..  113 

3.  Effective  stimulus  to  regeneration         ..          ..          ..  115 

4.  Time  for  regeneration    ..           ..           ..          ..          ..  117 

5.  Minimum  size  of  regenerating  fragments        ..          ..  120 

6.  Adjustments  to  proportionality  of  parts           ..           ..  123 

7.  Can  mouthparts  and  membranelles  be  formed  in  situ?  127 

8.  Repeated  oral  regeneration        .  .          .  .           .  .           .  .  130 

9.  Blockage  of  regeneration             ..           ..           ..           ..  131 

VIII    Activation  and  Inhibition  of  the  Oral  Primordium  135 

1.  The  course  and  spectrum  of  cell  interactions  .  .           .  .  136 

2.  Timing  the  period  of  activation             .  .           .  .          .  .  142 

3.  Relation    of    the    macronucleus    to    activation    and 

inhibition      ,  .           .  .           .  .           .  .           .  .           .  .  143 

4.  Relation  of  intact  feeding  organelles  to  activation  and 

inhibition      .  .           .  .          .  .          .  .           .  .  144 

5.  Synchronization  of  developing  primordia        .  .          .  .  149 

6.  Activation  in  reorganizers  and  dividers            .  .           .  .  152 

7.  Rerouting  the  oral  primordium             .  .          .  .  152 

IX    Primordium  Development           .  .                      .  .          .  .  159 

1.  Normal  location  and  development  of  the  primordium  159 

2.  Primordium  development  under  abnormal  conditions  164 

3.  Determination,  or  the  progressive  specification  of  the 

oral  anlage    .  .           .  .           .  .          .  .           .  .           .  .  170 

4.  Induction  of  mouthparts  formation      ..          ..           ..  174 

5.  Repair,  mending,  and  joining  of  primordia     ..          ..  176 

X    The  Primordium  in  Relation  to  the  Stripe  Pattern  179 

1.  Nature  of  the  normal  primordium  site  .  .                       ..  179 

2.  Production  of  supernumerary  primordia  180 

3.  Abnormal  primordia  correlated  with  abnormal  striping  184 

4.  Primordium  formation  in  loci  of  minor  stripe  contrast  188 


CONTENTS 


IX 


5.  Competition  among  loci  of  stripe  contrast; 

regeneration  and  obliteration  of  primordium  sites 

6.  Exceptions 

XI    Polarity 

1 .  Fixity  of  structural  polarity 

2.  Rate  of  regeneration  in  relation  to  the  polar  axis 

3.  Gradients  in  head  and  tail  formation 

XII    Fusion  Masses  of  Whole  Stentors 
I.  Simple  masses  and  biotypes 
2. 
3. 
4- 
5. 


Adjustments  among  formed  ectoplasmic  organelles 

Larger  masses  and  reduction  of  oral  valency  .  . 

Incomplete  oral  differentiation  .  . 

Absence  of  fission 

Tubes  and  ciliated  vacuoles 


XIII  Reconstitution  in  Disarranged  Stentors 

1.  Minced  stentors  .  . 

2.  Other  disarrangements  of  the  normal  cell  pattern 

XIV  Analysis    of    Stentor    Through    Its    Response    to 

External  Agents 

1 .  Action  of  the  membranellar  band 

2.  Coordination  of  body  cilia 

3.  Ciliary  anaesthesia 

4.  Anaesthesia  of  myonemes 

5.  Comparison  of  osmotic  effects  to  cooling 

6.  Acceleration  of  division  .  . 

7.  Changes  in  state  of  the  protoplasm 

8.  Tests  for  an  antero-posterior  metabolic  gradient 

9.  Acquired  tolerance  to  external  agents  .  . 

10.  Shedding  of  pigment  and  pellicle 

1 1 .  Shedding  of  the  membranellar  band    .  . 

12.  Morphogenetic  effects     .  . 

13.  Inhibition  of  growth  by  X-ray,  and  other  effects 

14.  Effect  of  temperature  on  size     .  . 

XV    Metabolism  .  . 

1 .  Effects  of  starvation 

2.  Storage  and  utilization  of  nutrient  reserves 

3.  Respiration 

4.  Digestion  .  .  .  .  .  .       "  .  . 

5.  Symbiosis  with  green  algae 

6.  Parasites  of  stentor 

7.  Abnormal  stentors 

(a)  Depigmented  stentors 

(b)  Over-pigmented  stentors 

(c)  Amorphous  stentors 


190 
191 

195 
195 
201 

202 

205 
205 
211 
213 
215 
215 
215 

220 
220 
226 


232 
232 
238 
240 
241 

244 
244 

245 
246 
248 
250 
252 

254 
256 

257 

259 
259 
263 
265 
266 
267 
273 
274 
274 
275 
276 


CONTENTS 


XVI    Behavior  and  Functions  of  the  Nucleus 


lO. 

II. 

12. 

13- 
14- 
15- 


Location  of  the  macronucleus   .  . 

Clumping  of  the  nucleus 

Nodulation 

Equivalence  of  macronuclear  nodes 

Shape,  size  and  number  of  nuclear  nodes 

Control  of  nuclear  behavior 

Necessity  of  the  nucleus  for  oral  redifferentiation 

Reconstitution  of  shape  in  relation  to  the  nucleus 

Functioning  and  re-formation  of  vacuole  and  holdfast 

in  enucleates 
Behavior  of  enucleates    .  . 
Digestion  in  enucleates  .  . 
Survival  of  enucleates     .  . 
Consequences  of  excess  nucleus 
Consequences  of  reduced  nucleus 
Delayed  renucleation 


XVII 


Tow^ARD  A  Genetics  of  Stentor 

1.  Interspecific  chimeras  and  nuclear  transplantations 

2.  Racial  differences 

3.  Conjugation 


XVIII    Species  of  Stentor 

XIX    Techniques  . . 

1 .  Collecting 

2.  Culturing .  . 

3.  Survival  on  slides 

4.  Staining    .  . 

5.  Cutting  methods.  . 

6.  Grafting    .  . 

7.  Minceration 

8.  Enucleation  and  renucleation 

XX    Extensions   .  . 

I.   Stentor  and  other  ciliates 

Hypotheses  concerning  morphog 
Stentors  and  cells 
Stentor  and  metazoa 
Theoretical  considerations 


Bibliography  of  Stentor 
Other  References  Cited 
Author  Index 
Subject  Index 


of  ciliates 


CHAPTER    I 

INTRODUCTION 

What  are  stentors  good  for  ? 

One  would  like  to  say  that  these  exquisite  little  organisms  are 
a  sufficient  wonder  in  themselves  and  that  to  study  them  as  a  part 
of  nature  is  an  expression  of  natural  curiosity  and  that  happy 
relationship  between  subject  and  object  which  carries  its  own  self- 
justification.  Doubtless  this  delight  sustains  the  investigator 
throughout  what  would  otherwise  be  the  weary  and  protracted 
pursuit  of  other  ends.  Moreover,  the  experience  of  science  has 
shown  that  pursuing  a  subject  for  its  own  sake  is  likely  to  turn  up 
clues  to  which  a  more  ulterior  approach  would  be  blind. 

Yet  this  hobby-like  vitality  of  interest  is  not  sufficient.  Our 
studies  become  truly  exciting  and  fruitful  to  others  only  when 
they  lead  to  general  principles  on  the  theoretical  level.  Of  necessity 
we  have  to  start  with  some  specific  organism,  woefully  unique  in 
itself,  out  of  the  immense  variety  of  existing  forms  of  life,  yet  we 
want  our  study  eventually  to  be  relevant  to  general  problems  of 
biology. 

To  rew^ord  the  question,  we  may  ask  what  particular  advantages 
Stentor  may  have  with  respect  to  these  larger  ends,  that  an  entire 
book  should  be  devoted  to  this  one  type  of  organism. 

Most  outstanding  is  that  on  stentors  one  can  easily  perform  a 
wider  range  of  micrurgical  operations  than  on  any  other  uni- 
cellular organism  or  tissue  cell,  remarkable  though  the  experiments 
with  Amoeba  and  the  single-celled  alga  Acetabularia  have  been. 
These  operations  are  made  possible  by  what  for  lack  of  a  more 
subtle  analysis  we  have  to  call  the  consistency  of  the  endoplasm 
which  permits  grafting  whole  animals  or  cell  parts  in  any  number, 
combination,  or  arrangement  desired.  The  relatively  large  size 
of  these  cells  is  a  help,  though  the  largest  are  no  bigger  than  the 
period  at  the  end  of  this  sentence.  Stentors,  unlike  amcEbas, 
exhibit  a  high  degree  of  visible  cytoplasmic  differentiation  and  in 


2  THE     BIOLOGY     OF     STENTOR 

several  species,  including  the  commonest,  the  cortical  pattern  is 
conveniently  outlined  by  a  series  of  pigmented  stripes  so  that  the 
organization  of  individualities  and  the  identification  of  local  areas 
and  grafted  patches  is  quite  evident  in  the  living  material.  This 
offers  many  advantages.  With  cells  and  patches  self-marked, 
operations  can  be  guided  and  specified,  and  the  whole  range  of 
classical  grafting  experiments  and  transplantations  can  be  ex- 
tended to  the  cell  level  of  organization.  Fixing  and  staining  are  not 
required  to  follow  the  performance  of  grafts  so  that  experiments 
proceed  rapidly  and  can  be  done  in  sufficient  number  for  valid 
conclusions.  Complex,  specific,  asymmetric  elaborations  of  form 
increase  the  number  of  responses  to  alteration  of  the  system  which 
we  can  observe  and  measure,  and  render  Stentor  highly  relevant 
to  the  great  unsolved  problem  of  organic  form.  A  cytoarchitecture 
which  has  repeatedly  been  postulated  as  necessary  to  explain  the 
orderly  development  of  eggs  is  visibly  displayed  in  stentors  and 
does  in  fact  play  a  cardinal  role  in  their  morphogenesis. 

Different  species  of  Stentor  can  be  grafted  together  almost  as 
readily  as  cells  and  cell  parts  of  one  species.  The  cytoplasms  and 
nuclei  of  two  or  even  more  species  can  be  combined  in  any  desired 
proportions,  and  this  is  a  new  method  of  ''transduction"  by 
which  not  only  different  genetic  material  may  be  added  to  a  cell 
but  also  alien  cytoplasm.  These  chimeras  persist  and  do  not  fall 
apart,  cytoplasms  mingle  and  nuclei  are  maintained  at  least  for  a 
considerable  time  in  foreign  cytoplasm  on  which  they  often  exert 
a  visible  influence. 

The  macronucleus,  which  alone  is  significant  in  the  vegetative 
life  of  stentors,  is  clearly  visible  in  the  living  animal.  Enucleations 
are  not  difficult.  Stentors  therefore  provide  additional  examples 
in  which  the  contribution  of  the  nucleus  may  be  assessed  by 
determining  the  consequences  of  its  absence.  The  more  types  of 
cell  in  which  this  operation  is  possible  the  more  likely  we  are  to 
come  to  general  conclusions.  Moreover,  the  extended  form  of  the 
nucleus  in  Stentor  allows  us  to  remove  all  or  only  a  desired  portion 
of  it.  Such  quantitative  operations,  when  combined  with  additions 
of  enucleated  or  highly  nucleated  cytoplasmic  masses  vary  the 
ratio  of  nucleus  to  cytoplasm  in  extremes  not  heretofore  possible. 
Interesting  consequences  of  this  imbalance  are  evident  in  stentors. 

The  same  properties  which  permit  grafting  also  make  possible 


INTRODUCTION  3 

the  transfer  from  one  cell  to  another  of  nuclei  retained  within  a 
thin  envelope  of  endoplasm,  allowing  enucleated  cells  to  be 
renucleated  at  any  time  or  the  nucleus  of  one  species  to  be  sub- 
stituted for  that  of  another  with  practically  no  admixture  of 
cytoplasms. 

When  added  to  the  simpler  experiments  on  stentor  fragments 
in  which  parts  become  wholes,  the  possibilities  afforded  by  these 
operations  and  their  permutations  appear  endless.  The  organic 
integration  by  which  new  individualities  become  one  can  be 
explored.  Nucleo-cytoplasmic  interactions  and  the  nature  of 
species  differences  are  opened  to  inquiry  with  fresh  material. 
Problems  of  polarity  can  be  explored  in  heteropolar  grafts  of  cells 
and  cell  parts.  Cell  differentiation  under  a  variety  of  conditions 
occurs  before  our  eyes.  The  intimate  nature  of  aging,  necrosis, 
and  damage  by  various  external  agents  can  be  investigated  by 
testing  the  revival  of  "  sick  "  animals  after  grafting  them  to  healthy 
cells  or  cell  parts  in  stentors  as  in  the  important  work  which 
Daniels  (1958)  is  doing  with  giant  amoebas.  These  are  only  a 
sampling  of  what  can  be  done. 

Stentors  share,  now  or  potentially,  experimental  advantages 
common  to  many  protozoa.  As  free-living  cells  they  are  directly 
affected  by  alterations  in  the  fluid  medium ;  and  it  has  been  found 
that  certain  substances  added  to  the  medium  may  produce  profound 
effects  in  the  behaviour,  reproduction,  and  morphogenesis  of 
stentors.  Since  stentors  undergo  sexual  conjugation  at  times, 
genetic  experiments  should  eventually  be  possible.  Irradiation  or 
other  treatments  at  the  time  when  the  nuclear  complement  is 
reduced  to  a  simple  anlage  could  produce  mutations  as  genetic 
markers  and  indicators  of  cell  activities.  If  mating  types  appear 
as  in  other  ciliates  we  would  have  a  differentiating  characterization 
in  the  expression  of  which  the  roles  of  nucleus  and  cytoplasm 
could  be  investigated  by  direct  operations.  A  fundamental  need 
in  the  cancer  problem  as  well  as  of  general  biological  under- 
standing is  to  learn  precisely  what  incites  the  cell  to  division, 
whether  it  be  an  egg,  a  tissue  cell,  or  a  protozoan.  The  great 
amenability  of  stentors  to  manipulation  encourages  us  to  search 
for  the  answer  in  them. 

Each  of  these  experimental  possibilities  is  important  in  itself 
but  their  unique  combination  within  one  organism  makes  Stentor 


4  THE     BIOLOGY     OF     STENTOR 

one  of  the  classical  types  in  biology.  These  leads  can  more  intel- 
ligently be  pursued  in  all  their  modern  implications,  if  one  has  a 
thorough  background  in  the  biology  of  Stentor.  For  this  we  can 
draw  on  all  the  many  studies  of  stentors  extending  far  back  into 
the  previous  century  as  well  as  our  own  good  observations.  In 
what  follows  we  shall  therefore  try  to  summarize  all  that  is  known 
about  the  ciliate  protozoan,  Stentor.  Many  of  these  details  may 
seem  tedious  unless  one  keeps  in  mind  the  marvel  that  so  much 
can  be  learned  through  the  patient  efforts  of  a  long  procession  of 
able  students  about  a  single  type  of  minute  organism,  and  the 
wonder  that  so  tiny  and  seemingly  insignificant  an  animal  reveals 
on  close  inspection  so  much  integrated  complexity  of  form  and 
function.  a 


CHAPTER    II 

FORM   AND    FUNCTION    IN    STENTOR 

To  BECOME  acquainted  with  Stentor  we  begin  with  an  account  of 
those  features  of  the  organism  which  are  open  to  simple  observa- 
tion, emphasizing  S.  coeruleus  which,  because  of  its  commonness 
and  reveahng  pigmentation,  has  been  the  favored  type  for  study; 
but  there  is  no  reason  to  beheve  that  even  httle-known  species 
differ  fundamentally  in  basic  Bauplan  or  manner  of  living. 

Several  of  the  early  investigators  were  impressed  by  what 
seemed  to  them  to  be  the  great  variability  in  form  of  stentors,  as 
the  species  name  polymorphus  and  multiformis  imply ;  but  the  form 
of  Stentor  is  no  more  indefinite  than  that  of  an  earthworm  merely 
because  it  extends  and  contracts.  The  shape  of  Stentor  is  simply 
that  of  a  cone  capable  of  extension  or  of  contraction  into  a  sphere. 
Attachment  is  by  the  point  of  the  cone,  a  small  enough  area  to 
permit  voluntary  release;  while  the  feeding  organelles  are  at  the 
broad  end  where  they  can  most  effectively  produce  a  vortex 
bringing  particulate  food  to  the  animal  from  a  large  region  of  the 
medium  which  lies  beyond  it  like  an  imaginary  extension  of  the 
cone.  Set  free  and  swimming,  the  shape  of  the  cell  under  what 
seems  to  be  minimum  tension  is,  as  Merton  (1932)  remarked, 
that  of  a  gently  rounded  cone.  Shortening  of  contractile  elements 
pulls  the  cone  into  a  sphere,  and  extension  is  the  result  of  elasticity, 
pulling  by  the  feeding  membranelles,  and  possibly  transverse 
contraction. 

The  surface  is  covered  by  alternating  longitudinal  stripes  of 
two  kinds:  bands  of  granules,  often  colored,  forming  stripes  which 
increase  in  width  in  an  orderly  way  around  the  cell  and,  between 
these,  clear  stripes  of  relatively  constant  width  which  bear  the 
rows  of  body  cilia  as  well  as  a  complex  of  fibers  probably  respon- 
sible for  longitudinal  contraction  and  ciliary  coordination  (Fig.  i). 
To  accommodate  for  the  decreasing  cross-section  of  the  cone  the 
granular  stripes  taper  near  the  apex  and  some  of  both  kinds  of 


b  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

Striping  stop  short  of  the  posterior  pole.  Cross-sections  of  con- 
tracted animals  show  a  corrugated  surface  with  the  clear  stripes 
lying  in  valleys  between  the  raised  granular  stripes. 

A  thin  pellicle  forms  the  outermost  surface  of  the  cell.  It  could 
conceivably  be  the  product  of  secretory  activity,  special  elaboration 
of  which  may  produce  cyst  walls  and  the  cylindrical  cases  found 
in  some  species.  The  pellicle  is  not  completely  elastic  and  on 
contraction  is  thrown  into  transverse  folds  over  the  granular 
stripes,  causing  the  surface  of  the  rounded  animal  to  appear  like 
a  scalloped  theater  curtain. 

The  graded  variation  in  the  width  of  the  granular  stripes 
provides  a  fundamental  asymmetry  to  the  pattern  of  the  cell.  In 
the  oral  meridian  these  bands  are  narrowest  and  they  gradually 
increase  in  size  around  the  cell  from  left  to  right  so  that  the  widest 
bands  eventually  come  to  lie  next  to  the  narrowest  in  a  locus  of 
stripe- width  contrast  on  the  oral  or  ventral  side.  Stripe  multiplica- 
tion occurs  in  this  region,  the  widest  granular  stripes  being  split 
by  the  interpolation  of  new  clear  bands.  Because  this  splitting 
generally  proceeds  from  the  anterior  end  and  does  not  follow  all 
the  way  through  to  the  posterior,  there  results  a  triangle  of  shorter 
stripes  which  was  called  the  ramifying  zone  by  Schuberg  (1890). 
This  area  is  also  the  region  in  which  the  oral  primordium  appears. 

All  stentors  attach  by  a  temporary  holdfast  organelle  at  the 
posterior  end.  In  undisturbed  cultures  only  a  few  animals  will  be 
found  freely  swimming  (Gelei,  1925),  and  this  may  be  taken  as  the 
usual  condition  in  nature. 

Stentors  sink  to  the  bottom  in  agitated  cultures,  their  specific 
gravity  being  greater  than  that  of  water.  Attachment  may  serve 
the  purpose  of  keeping  them  with  minimum  expenditure  of  energy 
in  favorable  locations  toward  the  surface  of  the  water  where  oxygen 
is  abundant.  It  may  also  be  assumed  that  the  effectiveness  of  the 
feeding  vortex  created  by  the  peristome  is  increased  when  the 
animal  is  attached. 

Adherence  is  firm.  Animals  just  detached  remain  sticky  at  the 
posterior  end  and  Jennings  (1902)  saw  them  dragging  trails  of 
mucoid  material  behind.  If  water  is  pipetted  out  of  a  culture, 
the  stentors  remain  fastened  to  the  sides  in  a  watery  film.  Rapid 
evaporation  may  even  leave  animals  stuck  to  the  rim  of  the  vessel 
where  they  dry  and  die,  seemingly  unable  to  loose  themselves. 


FORM    AND    FUNCTION    IN    STENTOR  7 

In  pipetting  animals  from  the  sides  of  a  vessel  the  holdfasts  are 
often  torn  off  because  of  their  firm  adherence.  Yet  stentors  can 
release  their  hold  at  will  under  favorable  conditions  in  order  to 
search  for  a  better  environment.  Thus  in  unfed  cultures  many 
animals  will  be  found  on  the  move  as  if  searching  for  food. 

Some  stentors  form  cases  and  are  still  more  sedentary.  Jennings 
(1902)  described  how  roeseli  seemed  to  explore  the  substratum  with 
its  anterior  end  and  when  a  likely  spot  was  found  the  tail  bent  over 
and  attached.  Then  mucous  was  secreted  over  the  posterior  half 
of  the  body  while  the  animal  moved  backward  and  forward  on  its 
side  for  about  two  minutes  as  it  secreted  an  elongated  cylinder. 
The  tube  was  later  compacted  somewhat  by  subsequent  contrac- 
tions of  the  stentor. 

In  describing  the  feeding  organelles  at  the  anterior  end  we  shall 
use  the  simplest  and  most  unambiguous  terms.  Confusion  and 
synonymy  have  arisen  in  the  past  largely  from  unjustified  attempts 
to  homologize  these  organelles  with  the  upper  parts  of  the  human 
alimentary  canal,  with  the  result  that  stentor  should  have  both  a 
pharynx  and  an  esophagus.  There  is  said  to  be  a  buccal  or  cheek 
cavity,  yet  what  is  called  the  mouth  or  cytostome  does  not  in  fact 
open  into  this  cavity  but  is  homologous  with  the  anterior  pyloric 
sphincter.  The  membranellar  band  is  usually  called  the  peristome, 
but  it  does  not  encircle  the  cytostome,  and  the  term  "peristome" 
was  originally  used  to  designate  a  special  fold  generally  running 
alongside  this  band  (see  Johnson,  1893).  Regardless  of  more 
precise  designations,  however,  it  will  be  convenient  at  times  to 
refer  to  the  entire  set  of  feeding  organelles  at  the  anterior  end  as 
the  '*head";  to  the  oral  pouch,  gullet,  and  cytostome  as  the 
'*  mouthparts  " ;  and  to  the  holdfast  as  the  "  foot ". 

The  anterior  end  or  frontal  field  is  covered  with  alternating 
clear  and  granular  stripes  the  same  as  the  lateral  body  wall  from 
which  it  is  derived  (Fig.  i).  Being  newly  formed,  the  granular 
stripes  there  are  narrow  and  the  clear  bands  with  their  ciliary  rows 
or  kinetics  are  close  together.  Bordering  and  almost  completely 
enclosing  the  frontal  field  is  a  band  of  membranelles  which  nor- 
mally spirals  always  in  one  direction  as  shown  in  the  figure. 
Fully  extended,  the  frontal  field  and  bordering  membranelles 
take  the  form  of  a  broad  funnel.  At  the  left  side,  in  most  stentors 
the  frontal  field  dips  down  sharply  with  its  striping  into  an  oral 


8  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

pouch  which  is  often  called  the  buccal  cavity.  The  membranellar 
band  runs  along  the  outer  edge  of  this  pouch  and  then  coils 
sharply  inward  into  an  invaginated  tube  which  itself  coils  about 
one  turn  into  the  cell.  This  tube  we  shall  call  by  the  rather  non- 
commital  term  of  gullet.  Food  vacuoles  are  separated  off  the  inner 


IroniaL  Held. 

membrsLncUar  band 
clear  harder  stripe 
oraiLpomJi 

contractile  vaciwle 
cv  pore 


ruJlei 


{ood  vacude 


macromiclesLr  node. 


micronus^us 


hxMIast 


Fig.  I.    Descriptive  diagram  of  Stentor  coeruleus. 


end  of  the  gullet,  which  therefore  has  a  temporary  film-like 
closure  to  prevent  endoplasm  from  escaping  into  the  gullet  but 
capable  of  acting  so  as  to  allow  passage  of  food  into  the  cell. 
Probably  the  ectoplasmic  lining  of  the  gullet  simply  ends  here  in  a 
thin  membrane  which  can  stretch  and  increase  to  form  the  wall 


FORM    AND    FUNCTION    IN    STENTOR  9 

of  a  new  food  vacuole  and  then  close  behind  it  as  the  vacuole  is 
pinched  off  into  the  interior.  But  vacuolar  walls  can  arise  de  novo 
as  is  seen  when  active  rotifers  are  ingested  and  thrash  around 
inside  the  cell  but  are  later  re-encapsulated  and  digested. 

In  feeding,  the  membranellar  band  by  coordinated  beating 
creates  a  powerful  vortex  which  draws  in  particulate  food  organ- 
isms, large  or  small.  Impinging  on  the  frontal  field,  particles  are 
moved  by  its  cilia  toward  the  oral  pouch  in  which  they  are  trapped 
and  concentrated,  whirling  around  within  the  cavity.  In  this  region 
the  food  is  apparently  tested.  If  undesirable  or  in  excess,  particles 
are  then  ejected  over  the  outer  rim  of  the  oral  pouch  and  carried 
toward  the  base  of  the  animal,  away  from  the  feeding  vortex,  by 
the  backward-beating  lateral  body  cilia.  If  to  be  ingested,  the  food 
is  passed  down  the  gullet  by  reason  of  its  ciliated  lining  and  is 
further  concentrated  while  peristalsis  of  the  gullet  forces  the 
material  into  the  interior. 

After  digestion  the  residue  in  the  food  vacuole  is  cast  out 
through  the  left  anterior  wall  of  the  cell  below  the  pulsating  con- 
tractile vacuole.  Especially  when  the  stentor  has  been  feeding  on 
tiny  flagellates,  many  exhausted  vacuoles  accumulate  and  fuse  in 
this  region,  forming  a  very  large  bolas  which  requires  about  one 
minute  to  be  voided.  Whether  there  is  a  permanent  anal  opening 
or  cytopyge  may  still  be  questioned. 

On  the  other  hand,  the  exit  of  the  contractile  vacuole  is  visibly 
persistent.  Moxon  (1869)  observed  openings  in  the  broad  granular 
stripes  exterior  to  the  contractile  vacuole  which  is  always  located 
in  the  anterior  left  side  of  the  cell.  These  openings  are  evident  in 
pigmented  coeruleus  as  clear  spots.  One,  at  least,  of  these  openings 
expands  noticeably  when  the  contractile  vacuole  is  voided, 
assuring  their  identification. 

Larger  species  of  Stentor  have  a  moniliform  macronucleus 
composed  of  many  nodes  lying  within  a  common  nuclear  mem- 
brane. This  nucleus  lies  underneath  the  ectoplasm  and  is  deployed 
in  a  characteristic  way  as  shown  in  the  illustration.  Adherent  to 
the  macronuclear  nodes  or  nearby  are  many  micronuclei.  Smaller 
species  show  a  single  compact  macronucleus;  and  micronuclei, 
which  are  very  tiny  in  stentors,  have  not  been  seen  in  all  species. 

Endoplasm  fills  the  interior  of  the  cell  and  is  in  irregular 
cyclosis,  possibly  because  extension  and  contraction  itself  pro- 


10  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

duces  sufficient  mixing.  The  endoplasm  has  been  described 
variously  as  alveolar  or  reticulate  and  contains  reserve  materials 
in  the  form  of  droplets  and  granules. 

When  maximally  contracted,  stentors  become  nearly  perfect 
spheres.  Most  stentors  are  also  capable  of  remarkable  extension. 
When  attached  and  feeding  the  body  may  stretch  out  to  three  to 
six  times  the  diameter  of  the  contracted  animal  while  the  feeding 
organelles  expand  vv^idely  to  produce  the  stentorian  or  trumpet 
shape.  All  the  complex  structures  of  the  cortical  layer  are  therefore 
capable  of  w^ide  displacements  though  maintaining  their  precise 
pattern  and  organization. 

Next  we  shall  consider  what  is  known  of  the  behavior  of 
stentors  and  then  we  can  deal  with  the  fine  points  of  structure  in 
terms  of  which  this  behavior  is  to  be  explained  and  which 
demonstrate  the  highly  complex  and  precise  achievements  of 
morphogenesis. 


CHAPTER    III 

BEHAVIOR 

In  broad  perspective,  multicellular  animals  enjoy  periods  of 
relaxation  or  inactivity,  but  their  constituent  cells  are  ever  active 
as  long  as  life  maintains.  Unicellular  animals  share  with  tissue 
cells  this  unresting  activity,  and  stentors  are  no  exception.  In  their 
reproduction,  continual  search  for  food,  and  avoidance  if  possible 
of  unfavorable  surroundings,  the  abiding  impression  is  that 
stentors  are  always  busy.  Cessation  of  swimming  and  attachment 
by  the  holdfast  is  only  the  prelude  to  active  feeding.  If  we  define 
behavior  as  altered  response  to  changing  conditions,  unresting 
stentors  are  continually  behaving.  Observing  them  even  briefly, 
one  is  struck  by  the  appearance  that  their  activity  is  not  mechan- 
istically simple,  though  they  may  be  high-grade  automatons.  If 
we  place  ourselves  in  the  position  of  early  investigators,  the 
wonder  is  renewed  that  even  in  these  minute  and  lowly  forms  of 
life  we  can  undertake  to  analyze  behaviour. 

I.  Food  selection 

Food  selection  in  Stentor  seems  to  have  been  clearly  demon- 
strated in  a  nice  series  of  experiments  by  Schaeffer  (1910).  He 
recorded  the  uptake  by  coeruleus  placed  for  a  time  in  a  prescribed 
suspension  of  particles  as  well  as  observing  what  happened  when 
single  particles  were  introduced  one  at  a  time  with  a  capillary 
pipette  into  the  feeding  vortex.  In  one  of  the  "hand  feeding" 
tests,  for  example,  12  Phacus  were  ingested  and  only  three  rejected, 
while  13  indigestible  sulphur  particles  were  rejected  and  only 
three  taken  in.  In  another  test  all  50  Phacus  presented  were 
ingested,  while  18  starch  grains  were  rejected  and  only  one 
accepted.  Size  was  not  determinative  because  the  starch  grains 
were  four  to  one-eighth  times  the  size  of  Phacus.  Again,  21  Phacus 
and  I  starch  grain  were  eaten,  while  7  Phacus ^  12  grains,  and  11 
glass  particles  were  rejected.  Euglena  was  preferred  to  Chilomonas. 


II 


12  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

Phacus  and  Eiiglena  recently  killed  by  heat  or  alcohol  were  eaten 
as  readily  as  live  ones.  Stentor  even  discriminated  between  two 
species  of  Phacus,  predominately  accepting  triqueter  and  rejecting 
longicaudus  but  there  were  no  observations  on  whether  the  latter 
was  actually  indigestible. 

In  mass  feedings  from  mixtures  of  equal  parts,  a  stentor  took  in 
1,500  Chlamydomonas,  85  Euglena,  and  10  carmine  particles.  In 
carmine  alone  20  units  were  taken  in.  Hence  generally  less  carmine 
was  eaten  when  food  was  present  than  when  not,  and  carmine 
was  even  rejected  preferentially  when  much  in  excess  over  food 
particles  in  the  mixture.  In  India  ink  alone  only  3  granules  were 
taken  in,  so  the  greater  number  of  mistakes  made  with  carmine  as 
compared  with  the  smaller  ink  particles  was  the  reverse  of  that 
found  with  paramecia.  These  tests  indicate  that  when  fed,  stentors 
become  more  selective  but  they  also  rejected  more  of  the  favored 
items  as  if  no  longer  hungry. 

Conversely,  hungry  stentors  were  found  to  be  less  selective. 
This  may  explain  apparently  contradictory  observations,  because 
an  investigator  testing  the  ingestion  of  a  given  type  of  material 
would  be  likely  to  use  starved,  clear  stentors  in  which  confusing 
food  vacuoles  were  not  already  present.  Thus  on  occasion  stentors 
will  ingest  considerable  numbers  of  fine  carmine  and  ink  particles 
(Schuberg,  1890;  Jennings,  1902).  Before  Schaeffer's  studies, 
Jennings  had  therefore  concluded  that  there  is  no  selection  after 
the  material  reaches  the  oral  pouch,  ''dissatisfaction"  with  the 
meal  resulting  only  in  cessation  of  feeding  and  turning  in  a  new 
direction.  Prowazek  (1904)  observed  that  coeruleus  ate  free-living 
Chlorella  though  it  could  only  partially  digest  them;  and  I  have 
found  plentiful  "food"  vacuoles  in  samples  of  this  stentor  left 
unnutrified  for  nearly  a  month  and  apparently  re-feeding  on  waste 
materials.  Johnson  (1893)  remarked  that  coeruleus  eats  the  alga 
Scendesmus  in  quantity  but  apparently  does  not  digest  it  and 
quickly  passes  this  material  through  the  cell.  Hence  even  when 
indigestible  materials  are  eaten,  the  animal  can  short-circuit  to 
the  cytopyge  food  vacuoles  with  useless  contents. 

On  the  evidence,  food  selection  does  occur  in  Stentor,  though 
by  no  means  perfect  and  distinctly  related  in  its  acuity  to  the  state 
of  the  organism. 

The  next  consideration  is  the  basis  for  this  selection,   and 


BEHAVIOR  13 

Schaeffer's  observations  on  this  point  are  interesting  though 
negative.  As  noted,  Hve  and  dead  food  organisms  were  not  dis- 
criminated nor  were  fragments  versus  whole  organisms.  When 
mixed  in  sugar,  beef  extract,  and  other  solutions,  ink  and  carmine 
particles  were  still  predominantly  rejected.  Likewise,  I  have 
observed  that  the  empty  but  well-formed  hulls  of  long-dead 
rotifers  were  quickly  rejected  at  the  same  time  that  their  live 
fellows  were  being  eaten.  Therefore  neither  size,  shape,  taste  nor 
activity  of  food  particles  seem  to  be  the  basis  of  selection,  which 
remains  a  considerable  mystery.  Schaeffer's  results  are  perhaps 
the  more  remarkable  because  his  stock  cultures  were  being  fed  on 
something  entirely  different,  viz.  ''small  paramecia",  doubtless 
with  bacteria;  and  materials  like  sulphur  grains,  carmine,  and 
glass  particles  are  probably  never  encountered  by  stentors  in 
nature.  His  demonstration  of  food  selection  is  rendered  more 
credible  by  Lund's  (1914)  evidence  of  similar  discrimination  in 
the  related  Biirsaria  truncatella. 

In  a  still  more  closely  allied  genus,  Parafolliculina,  Andrews 
(1947)  found  that  an  increase  of  10  °C  doubles  the  rate  of  feeding 
or  the  number  of  food  vacuoles  formed  in  a  given  period  of  time. 
Very  likely  it  is  the  same  in  stentors,  increased  feeding  being  the 
consequence  of  thermal  acceleration  of  the  membranelles  (Sleigh, 

1956). 

It  remains,  if  possible,  to  locate  the  site  of  food  selection  as  we 
follow  the  course  of  digestible  material  during  the  feeding  act. 
Particles  drawn  in  by  the  vortex  produced  by  the  membranellar 
band  impinge  on  the  aboral  side  of  the  funnel-shaped  frontal 
field  and  are  carried  into  the  buccal  pouch  by  the  oralward 
beating  of  the  rows  of  frontal  cilia.  In  clouds  of  carmine,  according 
to  Schaeffer,  the  frontal  field  cilia  may  beat  circularly,  forming 
balls  of  this  material  which  then  fall  over  the  edge  of  the  disc. 
If  so,  this  would  constitute  pre-oral  selection,  but  Dierks  (1926a) 
could  not  confirm  this  behaviour;  and  I  found  that  the  feeding 
vortex  simply  creates  a  locus  of  nearly  zero  water  velocity  at  the 
non-oral  end  of  the  membranellar  band  where  granules  collect 
until  a  mass  is  built  up  and  falls  into  the  rejection  current.  Current 
velocity  over  the  frontal  field  itself  is  too  great  to  permit  such 
accumulations  as  Schaeffer  described. 


14  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

When  items  of  considerable  size,  like  small  rotifers  or  hypo- 
trichs,  fall  into  the  oral  pouch  they  are  trapped  by  its  partial 
closure  as  already  indicated  by  Johnson  (1893)  and  Andrews  (1946). 
As  I  often  observed,  the  rim  of  this  cavity  is  independently  con- 
tractile and  closes  a  widely  opened  pouch  until  only  a  narrow 
orifice  is  left  while  the  rest  of  the  frontal  field  remains  completely 
expanded.  Cilia  from  extensions  of  the  ciliary  rows  in  the  frontal 
field  into  the  pouch  cause  the  particles  to  spin  around  inside. 
Schaeffer  stated  that  there  was  less  of  this  looping  if  the  animals 
were  either  hungry  or  well-fed,  as  if  in  the  first  case  they  were  in 
a  hurry  to  ingest  the  food  while  in  the  second  they  would  not 
bother  to  test  it.  He  therefore  thought  that  the  oral  pouch  is  the 
organ  of  food  selection;  but  Dierks  maintained  that  selection 
occurs  principally  at  the  opening  into  the  gullet  and  I  am  inclined 
to  agree  with  him  from  observation  that  particles  are  not  rejected 
until  after  they  have  reached  and  spun  around  for  a  moment  in 
this  region.  As  Schaeffer  noted,  particles  may  be  rejected  at  the 
same  time  that  others  are  being  ingested,  so  that  selection  is  indeed 
precise  and  implies  a  fine  coordination.  Even  after  particles  enter 
the  gullet  reversal  of  the  cilia  there  may  eject  undesirable  items, 
but  once  they  pass  to  the  lower  end  the  cilia  invariably  carry  them 
inward,  according  to  Dierks. 

Food  is  propelled  in  the  gullet  not  only  by  specialized  body 
cilia  but  also  by  the  spiral  extension  inward  of  the  membranellar 
band.  The  entire  gullet  seems  to  be  formed  by  invagination  and 
extension  of  this  band  and  of  originally  surface  ectoplasm  lying 
adjacent,  both  spiralling  inward.  An  orderly  contraction  of  ecto- 
plasmic  myonemes  thus  carried  into  the  gullet  could  therefore 
produce  the  peristalsis  observed  by  Dierks,  which  apparently 
comes  into  play  when  large  objects  are  swallowed.  Dierks  also 
confirmed  that  Stentor  is  more  selective  of  what  it  ingests  as  the 
cell  becomes  replete. 

The  pouch  and  gullet,  like  the  cell  surface  in  general,  are 
capable  of  great  extension  and  contraction.  In  cannibalization  they 
open  wide  enough  to  accommodate  a  fellow  stentor  nearly  as  large 
as  the  predator.  Gelei  (1925)  therefore  thought  that  the  fine  mesh- 
work  surrounding  the  gullet  which  he  observed  in  sectioned 
animals  is  to  prevent  tearing  of  this  organelle  when  greatly 
stretched.  He  also  found  that  the  force  of  closure  of  the  oral 


BEHAVIOR  15 

pouch  was  such  that  pieces  of  stentor  prey  could  be  bitten  off. 

As  in  many  other  cihates,  the  food  vacuoles  after  they  are 
pinched  off  from  the  inner  end  of  the  gullet  may  be  guided  into 
the  interior  by  long  fibrils  dangling  therefrom,  first  described  in 
Stentor  by  Schuberg  (1890).  But  these  could  also  serve  a  different 
purpose.  Andrews  (1946)  observed  them  in  gullets  everted  by 
pressure.  When  released  the  gullet  can  reinvert  in  only  10 
minutes  and  this  may  be  accomplished  by  traction  of  the  fibers 
in  question. 

Perhaps  a  nice  point  of  morphology  is  that  the  rim  of  the  oral 
pouch  over  which  rejected  particles  are  dumped  is  definitely 
below  the  level  of  the  frontal  field  and  membranelles  so  that 
rejects  probably  do  not  return  to  the  oral  stream. 

Gullet  ciha  and  membranelles  can  work  independently,  for 
Dierks  noticed  that  ingestion  may  occur  while  the  membranelles 
circling  the  anterior  end  have  for  some  reason  stopped. 

Cannibalism  has  been  observed  in  the  three  species  of  Stentor 
most  commonly  cultured  and  may  also  occur  in  others.  Ingestion 
of  its  fellows  by  coeruleus  was  first  reported  by  Johnson  (1893) 
and  was  the  subject  of  a  special  study  by  Gelei  (1925)  who  also 
noticed  cannibalism  in  roeseli;  and  Ivanic  (1927)  claimed  that 
cannibalism  occurs  in  polymorphus.  I  recorded  indubitable  evidence 
of  cannibalism  in  all  of  the  9  stocks  of  coeruleus  which  I  have 
growing  in  my  laboratory.  To  paraphrase  Gelei,  at  least  three 
problems  come  to  mind  in  regard  to  this  peculiar  food  choice: 
Why  stentors  come  to  eat  each  other,  how  they  are  able  to  ingest 
such  large  objects,  and  what  the  consequences  are  for  the  can- 
nibalizer,  particularly  whether  it  is  able  to  digest  its  own  species 
of  protoplasm.  These  topics  will  be  considered  in  that  order. 

Gelei  noticed  that  hunger  or  the  absence  of  other  food  organisms 
is  not  the  cause  of  cannibalism,  as  may  be  inferred  from  the  fact 
that  stentors  will  ingest  more  of  their  fellows  when  they  already 
have  one  or  more  of  these  huge  '*  meals  "  in  the  process  of  digestion. 
I  found  one  coeruleus  with  five  others  inside.  I  also  noticed  can- 
nibalism to  be  most  frequent  in  cultures  only  a  day  or  two  fol- 
lowing their  nutrification.  But  neither  is  satiety  the  cause;  for 
cannibalism  is  found  in  starving  samples,  but  not  as  frequently  as 
one  might  expect.  These  observations  disprove  Ivanic's  contention 
that  cannibalizing  stentors  and  other  protozoa  have  a  need  and 


l6  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

therefore  a  hunger  for  their  own  type  of  protoplasm  because  of 
some  deficiency  which  has  developed.  Also  it  seems  unreasonable 
to  suppose  they  could  correct  this  lack  by  ingesting  animals  in  the 
same  culture,  therefore  subject  to  the  same  deprivations.  Likewise 
we  have  to  question  Johnson's  plausible  and  attractive  suggestion 
that  cannibahsm  should  help  the  species  to  survive  a  period  of 
scarcity,  although  an  ** ecological"  study  and  sampling  of  un- 
disturbed cultures  might  demonstrate  this  to  be  the  case.  Gelei 
thought  cannibalism  a  racial  trait  in  coeruleus  but  its  occurrence 
without  exception  in  a  wide  selection  of  stocks  is  against  this 
interpretation. 

Stentors  ingest  only  free-swimming  stentors  because  the  prey 
is  taken  in  by  the  attenuated  tail  end.  By  agitating  the  culture  jar 
to  set  animals  loose,  Gelei  was  able  to  increase  the  incidence  of 
cannibalism  from  about  1.5%  to  4.6%,  but  never  more.  The 
posterior  point  of  the  animal  to  be  eaten  is  drawn  deep  into  the 
gullet  where  it  is  held  in  spite  of  the  prey's  rotating  and  attempting 
to  escape.  In  fact,  the  victims  may  usually  manage  to  escape  and 
I  believe  no  one  has  actually  observed  the  swallowing,  but  this 
may  be  due  to  disturbance  by  bright  illumination  under  the  micro- 
scope. As  mentioned,  the  rim  of  the  oral  pouch  shows  contractions 
that  may  even  bite  off  the  posterior  end  of  the  prey.  Ingested 
animals  are  usually  smaller  than  the  predator,  yet  Gelei  stated  that 
cannibals  may  swallow  animals  larger  than  themselves.  Once  inside, 
the  victim  is  not  surrounded  by  a  food  vacuole  at  first;  therefore 
it  remains  alive  and  actively  rotating  for  perhaps  the  better  part 
of  a  day,  during  which  it  can  be  released  and  always,  in  my  experi- 
ence, will  recover.  If  not  released  the  prey  is  eventually  surrounded 
by  a  membrane  and  enclosed  as  a  food  vacuole  within  which  it 
stops  moving,  dies,  and  becomes  wrinkled  within  an  hour.  Stentors 
will  also  eat  individuals  of  a  diflFerent  species  of  the  same  genus. 
I  have  frequently  found  polymorphus  ingested  by  larger  coeruleus. 

There  is  no  doubt  that  stentors,  like  other  cannibal  ciliates, 
can  digest  their  own  kind.  As  Gelei  described  the  process,  coagula- 
tion is  the  first  sign  of  digestion  and  the  corpse  becomes  friable. 
Fat  spherules  then  appear  in  "astonishing"  numbers;  this  could 
be  due  to  the  coalescence  of  pre-existing  lipoid  droplets  which  are 
very  tiny  and  not  easily  seen.  The  nucleus  is  digested,  its  nodes 
falling  apart  and  becoming  progressively  smaller  and  more  weakly 


BEHAVIOR  17 

Staining.  Pellicle  and  myonemes  are  digested  slowly.  Cilia  are  often 
the  last  to  be  digested  and  are  first  attacked  at  their  distal  ends, 
then  gradually  disintegrating  and  swelHng  towards  the  base.  Gelei 
stated  that  pigment  granules  are  not  digested,  and  certainly  the 
last  stage  of  the  food  vacuole  is  a  bright  spot  of  concentrated  pig- 
ment; yet  the  fading  of  stentors  during  regeneration  and  starvation 
may  imply,  as  Weisz  (1949a)  maintained,  that  the  animals  are  able 
to  assimilate  their  own  coloring  matter.  Cannibals  doubtless 
receive  advantages  from  their  prey  as  food.  However  massive  these 
meals  may  be  and  however  easily  most  of  the  substance  of  their 
like  may  be  assimilated,  giant  forms  do  not  result,  as  in  the  case  of 
Blepharisma  (Giese,  1938)  and  Stylonychia  (Giese  and  Alden, 
1938).  Regulation  of  size  in  Stentor  is  therefore  such  as  to  prevent 
gigantism  or  the  production  of  forms  two  or  more  times  the 
maximum  normal  size. 


2.  Swimming 

That  ciliates  rotate  when  swimming  and  describe  a  spiral  path 
through  the  water  was  first  formulated  by  Jennings  (1899)  who 
pointed  out  that  such  movement  serves  the  same  purpose  as  in 
projectiles:  by  rotating,  an  asymmetrical  body  can  maintain  an 
over-all  straightness  in  the  direction  of  its  course  (Fig.  2A). 
Rotation  is  always  predominately  in  one  direction  in  a  given 
species.  Jennings  (1899,  1902;  Jennings  and  Jamieson,  1902)  found 
that  S.  roeseli  and  coendeus,  like  most  ciliates,  including  Parame- 
cium,  rotate  to  the  left,  i.e.,  front  end  of  the  animal  rotates  clock- 
wise. Slightly  curved  toward  the  oral  side,  stentors  also  tend  to 
swerve  in  this  direction  so  their  course  is  a  spiral.  Bullington 
(1925),  who  has  made  the  most  extensive  studies  of  swimming  in 
ciliates,  confirmed  that  three  unnamed  species  of  Stentor  rotate 
and  spiral  to  the  left.  On  the  basis  of  his  surveys  Bullington 
remarks  that  Stentor  is  with  Coleps  the  only  genus  of  more  than 
one  species  in  which  all  members  spiral  in  the  same  direction. 
{Paramecium  calkinsi  for  example  rotates  to  the  right.)  This 
generalization  may  be  valid,  for  I  found  that  the  new  species 
introversus  rotates  to  the  left,  as  does  coeruleus,  polymorphus  and 
roeseli.  When  backing  up  coeruleus  continues  to  rotate  to  the  left, 
as  Jennings  earlier  noted  for  polymorphus. 


i8 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Fig.  2.    Behavior  of  Stentor. 

A.  Avoiding  response :  {a)  normal  swimming  with  left  rotation 
and  slow  spiraling;  {b)  contraction  on  adverse  stimulation;  {c) 
backward  movement  even  if  stimulated  at  the  base ;  {d)  turning 
to  aboral  side  with  resumed  forward  swimming  in  new  direction. 


B.  Graded  response  of  feeding  animal  to  adverse  stimuli:  {a) 
undisturbed  posture ;  {b)  turning  away ;  {c)  feeding  vortex  stopped 
and  beating  of  body  cilia  reversed;  {d)  sharp  contraction;  {e) 
holdfast  released  and  animal  swims  away,  abandoning  lorica  {e) 
if  present.  With  repeated  stimuli  the  response  decreases  in  the 
direction  e-^a.   (After  Jennings,  1902). 


BEHAVIOR  19 

Like  those  of  other  ciHates,  stentor  fragments  which  are  not  of 
bizarre  shape  continue  normal  swimming  behavior.  Jennings  and 
Jamieson  (1902)  observed  that  isolated  heads,  tails,  and  mid-body 
fragments  of  coeruleus  rotate  and  spiral  to  the  left.  This  indicates 
that  the  direction  of  beating  of  the  membranellar  band  during 
swimming  is  not  contradictory  to  the  movement  produced  by  the 
body  cilia,  as  well  as  that  it  is  not  the  asymmetric  oral  structures 
which  produce  the  rotation.  Rather,  it  is  to  be  inferred  that  the 
body  cilia  do  not  beat  directly  backward  but  obliquely,  as  Parducz 
(1953)  has  elegantly  demonstrated  for  Paramecium.  Not  only  is 
the  direction  of  beating  of  each  cilium  oblique,  the  whole  ciliation 
is  so  coordinated  that  metachronal  waves  move  slant-wise  over 
the  surface  of  the  cell,  giving  the  appearance  of  rows  of  grain 
moved  in  succession  by  the  same  gusts  of  wind.  This  apparently 
calls  for  a  wave-like  impulse  passing  over  the  cell  surface  or  the 
successive  ''  firing  "  of  adjacent  ciUa  down  each  ciliary  row,  as  well 
as  coordination  between  adjoining  rows. 

When  a  swimming  stentor  encounters  a  noxious  stimulus  it 
swims  backward  a  little,  reversing  the  beat  of  the  body  cilia  and 
stopping  the  membranelles  while  pointing  them  forward,  turns 
toward  the  aboral  side  and  swims  forward  again,  quite  as  with 
Paramecium  (Fig.  2a).  The  membranelles  then  begin  beating  again 
as  they  are  pointed  backwards  presumably  to  aid  in  the  forward 
progression.  Merton  (1935)  avers  that  the  membranelles  sometimes 
help  in  swimming  backwards  but  I  find  them  always  held  quiet 
then.  He  confirmed  that  posterior  fragments  can  spiral  forward 
and  also  noted  that  they,  too,  are  able  to  swim  backward  ''  at  will ". 

A  common  behaviour  of  stentors  is  to  scoot  over  the  bottom  of 
the  dish  with  the  oral  surface  apphed  thereto,  apparently  to  explore 
for  and  break  loose  food  particles  like  a  vacuum  cleaner.  This  is 
the  preferred  method  of  feeding  in  the  related  genus  Condylostoma. 

The  effect  of  various  chemicals  in  narcotizing  and  reversing  the 
ciliary  beat,  as  well  as  cutting  experiments  concerning  ciliary 
coordination,  will  be  considered  in  Chapter  XIV. 

3.  Avoiding  reaction  and  learning 

After  feeding,  the  next  commonest  response  of  stentors  is  to 
manage  to  remove  themselves  from  the  reception  of  noxious 
stimuli.  Jennings  (1902)  made  a  careful  and  interesting  study  of 


20  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

this  avoiding  reaction  in  roeseli  and  coeruleus,  prodding  them  with 
a  glass  needle  or,  by  gentle  use  of  a  pipette,  injecting  into  the  oral 
vortex  substances  of  weak  chemical  stimulation,  like  carmine 
particles.  As  if  to  conserve  their  status  quo,  the  animals  performed 
a  series  of  distinctly  different  responses  of  increasing  intensity 
until  the  stimulus  was  avoided  (Fig.  2b). 

First,  a  light  touch  as  from  an  impinging  rotifer  which  could 
serve  as  food  provoked  no  response  in  coeruleus,  which  merely 
went  on  feeding,  and  roeseli  even  made  the  positive  response  of 
bending  toward  the  source  of  stimulation. 

When  the  stimulus  was  a  little  stronger,  as  from  a  large,  hard 
object  or  a  cloud  of  carmine  particles,  the  stentors  '*  turned  away." 
Remaining  attached  but  twisting  one  or  two  turns  on  the  axis,  the 
animals  then  bent  toward  the  aboral  side  always  and  therefore  not 
necessarily  away  from  the  source  of  stimulation.  This  reaction  is 
quite  like  the  avoiding  response  of  Paramecium:  a  fixed  response 
without  reference  to  the  direction  of  stimulus,  repeated  if  un- 
successful. 

Third,  the  membranelles  might  stop  and  body  cilia  reverse  for 
an  instant,  thereby  propelling  the  carmine  particles  forward  and 
away  from  the  anterior  end.  Feeding  currents  then  continued  and 
the  reaction  was  repeated  several  times  if  the  particles  were  still 
encountered.  This  response  sometimes  occurred  instead  of  turning 
away,  but  the  variability  may  have  been  due  to  the  difficulty  of 
providing  precisely  graded  stimuli. 

If  the  noxious  chemical  stimulus  still  persisted,  or  if  poked  with 
the  needle,  the  stentors  instantly  contracted,  slowly  extended  again, 
and  re-contracted  if  conditions  were  still  undesirable.  This  reaction 
could  continue  for  fifteen  minutes  if  carmine  particles  were  kept 
available  or  prodding  repeated. 

Fifth  and  finally,  the  holdfast  was  set  free  and  the  stentors  swam 
away  seeking  a  new  environment.  Sometimes  co^rw/^w^  detached  and 
swam  away  after  the  first  stimulus  but  usually  the  other  avoiding 
responses  intervened.  From  my  own  observations  it  appears  that 
stentors  from  cultures  which  have  recently  been  fed  are  more 
likely  to  persist  in  the  feeding  response  and  to  give  the  graded 
response,  as  if  bothered  by  the  interruption  of  a  good  thing, 
whereas  unfed  animals  are  more  likely  to  detach  and  swim  away 
at  once,   as  if  the  negative  stimulus  finally  prodded  them  to 


BEHAVIOR  21 

''decide"  to  go  in  search  for  food.  However,  the  case-bearing 
roeseli  would  not  abandon  its  home  by  mechanical  shocks  alone 
even  though  Jennings  struck  it  with  a  glass  needle  for  an  hour. 

Normal  reactions  of  avoidance  were  also  shown  by  stentors  after 
their  "  heads  "  had  been  excised  (Jennings  and  Jamieson,  1902). 
But  stentors  never  became  accustomed  to  truly  injurious  stimuli 
such  as  salt  solutions  (see  also  Merton,  1935)  or  sharp  poking, 
though  they  learned  to  put  up  with  a  lot  of  minor  disturbance. 
This  may  happen  frequently  in  nature  and  stentors  growing  among 
Tuhifex  have  been  observed  to  continue  feeding  and  not  contract 
though  constantly  struck  by  the  worms.  Jennings  provided  a  simple 
demonstration  of  this  accommodation  by  attempted  equal  impacts 
with  a  glass  needle  repeated  each  time  after  re-extension  of  the 
stentor.  After  about  a  dozen  strokes  there  was  no  contraction 
response  unless  the  animal  was  poked  several  times.  The  longer 
this  was  continued  the  greater  w^as  the  number  of  strikes  which 
were  necessary  to  elicit  contraction,  although  there  was  some 
irregularity  probably  due  to  inequality  of  impacts.  Eventually  the 
animals  detached  and  swam  away.  Sometimes  there  was  a  ready 
response  only  at  first,  repeated  proddings  then  eliciting  no  response 
until  the  animals  swam  away.  But  in  these  cases  he  noted  that  the 
stentors  did  not  remain  oblivious  to  the  blows  but  twisted  continu- 
ally and  turned  away  as  if  to  avoid  them,  finally  detaching  and 
swimming  away.  Hence  in  accommodation  there  was  a  reversal 
of  the  sequence  of  avoiding  reactions,  for  example,  contraction 
later  replaced  by  merely  turning  away.  Similar  abolishment  of 
major  avoiding  reactions  occurred  in  other  contractile  ciliates 
{Epistylis,  Vorticella,  and  Carchesium)  and  was  noted  by  Holmes 
(1907)  in  Loxophyllum. 

This  orderly  change  in  response  was  not  due  to  reaction  fatigue. 
About  a  minute  was  required  for  re-extension  and  this  should  have 
been  sufficient  for  complete  recovery.  Also,  stentors  could  be  kept 
continuously  contracting  for  an  hour  at  a  time,  but  they  very  soon 
ceased  responding  to  weaker  stimuli.  Nor  could  the  response  have 
been  due  to  sensory  fatigue  because  the  animals  showed  continued 
appreciation  of  the  stimulus  (by  turning  away)  and  because  stentors 
subjected  to  strong  mechanical  blows  or  injurious  salt  solutions 
continued  reacting  indefinitely.  Schaeffer  (1910),  for  instance,  said 
that  coeruleus  would  swim  backward,  without  spiralling,  continu- 


22  THE  BIOLOGY  OF  STENTOR 

ously  for  three  hours  in  a  dish  of  dense  carmine  particles.  Therefore 
if  learning  be  altered  response  due  to  previous  experience,  this  did 
in  fact  occur. 

The  weaker  the  stimulus  the  more  rapid  the  accommodation. 
To  a  jet  of  water  from  a  capillary  pipette  coeruleus  responded  only 
once  by  contraction  and  thereafter  merely  bent  in  a  new  position. 

If  stimulated  while  swimming,  Jennings  (1899)  reported  that 
polymorphus  contracts  and  backs  up  a  short  distance  then  turns  to 
the  right  side  always  and  swims  off  in  another  direction.  This 
response  was  invariable,  regardless  of  the  point  of  stimulation. 
Though  the  posterior  end  was  less  sensitive  than  other  parts,  a 
sharp  blow  here  elicited  the  same  response,  which  therefore 
carried  the  animal  toward  rather  than  away  from  the  point  of 
stimulation.  Unlocalized  stimulation  such  as  jarring  the  dish  also 
evoked  the  same  avoiding  response,  as  did  diffuse  chemical 
stimuli. 

Unlike  Paramecium  and  Chilomonas,  stentors  were  completely 
indifferent  to  bubbles  of  carbon  dioxide  or  solutions  of  acids,  not 
showing  the  spontaneous  aggregations  of  the  former  (Jennings 
and  Moore,  1901-02). 

Even  to  relatively  strong  solutions  of  cane  sugar  roeseli  showed 
no  avoiding  reaction  and  responded  by  sudden  contraction  only 
after  the  cell  became  obviously  affected  by  osmotic  pressure 
(Jennings,  1902). 

4.  Response  to  light 

Jennings  (1902)  noted  that  roeseli  does  not  respond  to  light  of 
ordinary  intensities.  According  to  Schulze  (1951)  polymorphus 
shows  contrasting  reactions  to  hght  depending  on  whether  sym- 
biotic Chlorella  are  present:  green  animals  appropriately  went  to 
the  lighted  side  of  the  aquarium  but  white  forms  collected  on  the 
dark  side.  Hammerling  (1946)  stated  th^t  polymorphus  is  sensitive 
to  strong  light  and  that  cultures  had  to  be  screened,  but  in  nature 
I  have  found  these  stentors  fully  exposed  to  brightest  summer 
sunshine.  In  coeruleus  the  reaction  seems  to  vary  with  the  strain. 
Testing  8  races  cultured  in  the  same  manner,  fed  on  the  same 
day  each  week,  and  producing  animals  of  about  the  same  intensity 
of  green  pigmentation,  I  found  that  two  showed  a  strong  negative 
response  to  daylight  and  quickly  accumulated  on  the  side  of  the 


BEHAVIOR  23 

dish  away  from  the  window ;  two  showed  no  response ;  the  remain- 
der showed,  fair,  weak,  or  doubtful  response. 

That  Stentor  coeriileus  moves  to  the  dark  side  of  an  elongated 
aquarium  was  reported  long  ago  by  Holt  and  Lee  (1901)  and 
interpreted  tropistically  as  due  to  an  orientation  in  the  field  of  light 
away  from  the  source  of  illumination.  An  extensive  study  of  this 
subject  was  made  by  Mast  (1906)  with  different  conclusions. 
Swimming  animals  placed  in  a  dish  lighted  from  one  side  simply 
showed  repeated  random  avoiding  responses  of  backing  up  and 
turning  until  they  found  themselves  headed  away  from  the  light, 
and  then  they  continued  swimming  forward  to  the  dark  side.  This 
response  kept  animals  confined  to  the  darkened  end  of  an  aquarium, 
as  if  an  invisible  wall  were  present.  That  the  confinement  was  not 
due  to  warming  caused  by  the  light  was  shown  by  the  fact  that 
paramecia  which  are  quite  sensitive  to  heat  but  not  to  light  swam 
readily  into  the  irradiated  area.  Attachment  of  course  prevented 
the  avoiding  response  of  stentors,  which  did  not  even  lean 
(tropistically)  away  from  the  light;  but  if  the  light  was  strong 
enough  the  animals  detached  and  then  gave  the  characteristic 
response.  Mast  concluded  that  the  anterior  end  was  most  sensitive 
to  light  because,  when  the  water  was  a  thin  film  so  that  the  stentors 
could  not  face  the  light  source  above  and  received  stimulation 
only  on  their  sides,  collecting  at  the  darker  end  was  slower.  This 
point  is  confirmed  by  my  observation  that  decapitated  stentors  no 
longer  avoid  the  light  (unpublished). 

Contrasting  wdth  coer ulcus,  the  yellow  S,  niger  shows  a  marked 
attraction  to  Hght,  according  to  the  studies  of  Tuffrau  (1957).  He 
states  that  all  parts  of  the  animal  appear  to  be  equally  sensitive  to 
the  stimulus  because  there  was  no  orientation  in  a  field  of  light,  yet 
the  head  end  could  be  more  sensitive  if  the  response  is  not  tropistic 
but  one  of  trial  and  error.  Although  there  was  some  individual 
variability,  most  of  the  animals  accumulated  rapidly  at  an  illumin- 
ated opening  in  the  side  of  a  covered  tube,  and  the  response  was  so 
strong  that  a  spot  of  light  acted  like  a  trap  in  preventing  stentors 
from  leaving  it  after  they  entered.  The  shorter  the  wave  length  of 
light,  the  stronger  the  attraction:  red  elicited  almost  no  response 
and  the  aggregations  increased  as  the  spectrum  shifted  to  blue, 
violet,  and  ultraviolet.  Animals  dark-adapted  for  fifteen  hours 
recovered  photoresponsiveness  in  an  hour  or  two.  The  rapidity  of 


24  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

response  varied  directly  with  the  temperature,  and  this  may  not  be 
solely  due  to  increased  rate  of  ciliary  beating  but  also  to  the  en- 
hancement of  photoreactions  in  the  cell. 

Dabrowska  (1956)  was  unable  to  get  coeruleus  to  associate  an 
electric  current  with  its  response  to  light,  and  hence  learning  by 
conditioned  response  was  not  demonstrated. 

5.  Response  to  heat  and  electric  current 

Alverdes  (1922)  found  th^t  polymorphus  reacted  to  heat  with  a 
typical  avoiding  response.  This  response  disappeared  when  the 
anterior  end  was  cut  off,  for  the  cell  body  then  swam  indiscrimin- 
ately towards  the  heated  end  of  the  slide  and  was  killed.  To  a  i  % 
solution  of  table  salt  the  headless  cell  bodies  gave  the  avoiding 
response  just  as  whole  animals.  He  concluded  that  warmth  percep- 
tion is  limited  to  the  anterior  end  while  chemical  sensation  is  over 
the  entire  body  surface.  This  interpretation  is  open  to  question, 
first,  because  salt  apparently  compels  ciliary  reversal  with  contin- 
uous backward  swimming  by  direct  action  on  the  coordinating 
mechanism,  and  second,  because  as  Dierks  (1926b)  pointed  out, 
the  response  of  the  isolated  heads  was  not  indicated.  Anterior  and 
posterior  half  fragments  would  better  have  been  compared  since 
both  are  capable  of  typical  avoiding  reactions,  with  use  of  a  less 
noxious  chemical  stimulant  like  carmine  particles. 

With  further  regard  to  sensory  localization,  Roesle  (1902) 
claimed  that  the  mouth  is  the  part  of  stentor  most  sensitive  to 
electric  currents  but  behavior  of  stentors  with  mouthparts  excised 
was  apparently  not  studied  for  comparison.  Roesle  also  reported 
that  an  induction  current  stimulates  Stentor  to  contraction  only 
when  the  direction  of  the  current  was  parallel  to  the  axis  of  the 
animal,  contrasting  with  muscle  physiology  in  which  stimulation 
is  independent  of  the  orientation.  Yet  Hausmann  (1927)  found 
that  polymorphus  contracted  and  backed  up  in  an  electric  current 
but  without  correlation  with  its  direction.  Stentor  was  more 
sensitive  than  smaller  ciliates  of  other  genera  so  that  at  least  the 
intensity  of  the  response  may  be  correlated  with  body  size  if  the 
animals  compared  normally  swim  at  the  same  speed.  Dierks  Roesle, 
neuroid  (1926b),  repeating  the  electrical  stimulation  studies  of 
found  that  Stentor  was  more  sensitive  to  the  current  than  any  of 
the  other  cihates  tested,  which  he  credited  to  the  presence  of  fibers. 


BEHAVIOR  25 

6.  The  question  of  sensory  cilia 

Certain  of  the  body  cilia  behave  differently  from  most.  According 
to  Kahl  (1935)  the  posterior  cilia  are  strongly  thigmotactic, 
coming  to  a  stop  when  they  touch  something  substantial.  Along 
the  ciliary  rows  it  has  been  found  that  groups  of  cilia  are  stiff 
and  pointed  outward  while  the  remainder  of  the  ciliation  is  actively 
beating;  and  these  have  been  called  tactile  spines,  setae,  or  Tast- 
borsten  (Fig.  3).  They  may  disappear  and  reappear.  Hence  Stein, 
who  seems  to  have  first  noticed  them,  thought  they  could  be  with- 
drawn into  the  body.  Johnson,  with  more  probability,  said  that 


Fig.  3.    Sessile  body  cilia  as  seen  in  S.  roeseli,  possibly  sensory. 
(After  Kahl,  1935.) 

they  were  only  temporarily  rigid  cilia  which  could  start  again 
beating  and  only  seemed  longer  than  the  others  because  they  were 
stopped.  He  suggested  a  sensory  function  for  the  cilia  in  the  rigid 
state  because  they  are  found  mostly  toward  the  anterior  end  where 
stimuli  would  presumably  be  most  frequent.  Since  Johnson  saw 
them  both  in  coeruleus,  which  makes  no  case,  and  in  roeseli  which 
does,  they  are  not  uniquely  correlated  with  case  building.  He 
found  them  most  evident  in  the  frontal  view ;  and  Kahl  states  that 
there  is  always  one  group  of  "  bristles  ",  five  to  twenty  in  number 
according  to  the  species,  in  each  kinety  directly  under  the 
membranellar  band. 


26 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    ST EN TOR 


7.  Cystment 

Hibernation  in  a  cyst  may  be  regarded  as  a  response  of  Stentor 
to  adverse  conditions.  Stein's  is  the  only  published  account  and 
characteristically  he  provided  beautiful  illustration  of  coeruleus 
and  polymorphus  cysts  (1867,  Tafeln  V  and  VI).  Although  the 
final  test  of  excystment  was  lacking,  he  can  hardly  have  been 
mistaken  because  the  coeruleus  capsules  retained  the  blue-green 
striping  and  the  polymorphus  were  of  similar  form,  with  chlorellae 
and  colorless  stripes.  In  both,  the  feeding  organelles  were 
dedifferentiated  and  the  animal  rested  within  a  flask-shaped  cyst 
with  a  gelatinous  plug  (Fig.  4).  Only  once  have  I  seen  coeruleus 
apparently  beginning  encystment  within  a  membrane  inside  which 


A 


B 


Fig.  4.  Cysts  of  (A)  coeruleus  and  (B)  polymorphus.  (After  Stein, 

1867.) 


it  rotated  for  a  day  but  then  died.  In  nigery  however,  cystment 
seems  to  occur  readily,  with  small,  spherical,  brown  cysts,  though 
again,  stentors  have  not  yet  been  seen  emerging  therefrom 
(unpublished). 

Altogether,  stentors  exhibit  a  considerable  range  of  behavior 
in  their  orderly  swimming  movements,  avoiding  responses,  food 
selection,  and  attachment  or  detachment  of  holdfast  "at  will". 


BEHAVIOR  27 

To  these  frequent  reactions  may  be  added  the  "decision"  to 
encyst  or  excyst,  as  well  as  the  special  response  to  each  other 
which  leads  to  the  joining  of  pairs  in  a  specific  orientation  for 
sexual  conjugation.  Of  special  interest  is  the  accommodation  to 
repeated  adverse  stimuli  which  Jennings  demonstrated  and  which 
may  be  regarded  as  the  best  evidence  of  a  primitive  type  of 
learning  in  unicellular  organisms. 

The  ease  with  which  stentors  lend  themselves  to  micrurgical 
operations  should  provide  opportunities  for  analyzing  the  struc- 
tural basis  of  coordination.  After  the  immediate  contraction 
response  to  cutting,  stentors  show  no  evidence  of  ''  pain  "  or 
lingering  effects  of  injury  as  the  fragments  or  cut  animals  swim 
away  in  a  remarkably  normal  manner.  Later  they  mend  the  cut  or 
regenerate  missing  parts,  but  between  the  time  of  cutting  and 
repair  or  reconstruction  there  is,  it  would  seem,  a  sufficient  period 
for  observing  effects  on  behavior  of  specific  lesions  and  ablations. 
Are  there  circumferential  cuts  at  certain  levels  of  the  cell  axis 
which  abolish  coordination  between  adjacent  rows  of  body  cilia  so 
that  spiral  swimming  is  prevented,  or  may  such  cuts  prevent  attach- 
ment or  detachment  of  the  holdfast?  Are  stentors  from  which  the 
oral  pouch  has  been  removed  or  those — after  a  method  which 
will  be  described  later  (p.  172) — developing  without  a  pouch  still 
capable  of  food  selection?  If  not,  could  they  be  made  to  ingest 
unusual  materials  relevant  to  analysis  of  their  metabolism?  If 
decapitation  abolishes  the  avoiding  response  to  light  in  coeruleuSy 
can  selective  ablations  at  the  anterior  pole  demonstrate  the  sensitive 
area ;  and  do  similar  operations  also  prevent  the  positive  response  to 
light  in  niger?  Do  stentors  temporarily  bereft  of  ingestive  organelles 
still  show  the  avidity  of  normal  animals  evidenced  by  quicker 
accommodation  to  mechanical  stimuli  when  in  the  presence  of 
food  after  a  period  of  deprivation,  or  is  the  successful  formation  of 
food  vacuoles  the  necessary  prelude  to  this  behavior? 

These  questions  are  but  a  sample  of  possible  ways  in  which 
behavior  on  the  cell  level  might  be-  investigated  in  a  form  so 
amenable  to  operation  as  Stentor.  Might  the  neurone  itself,  then 
be  capable  of  considerably  more  "  behavior "  than  mere 
''excitation",  realizing  as  part  of  the  nervous  system  something 
of  the  potentialities  which  have  been  evolved  in  a  different  manner 
but  from  the  same  cellular  origins,  in  ciHates? 


CHAPTER    IV 

FINE   STRUCTURE 

Bearing  in  mind  our  general  survey  of  the  morphology  of  Stentor, 
we  can  now  probe  the  intimate  construction  of  its  parts  as  the 
structural  basis  of  its  living  functions  and  behaviour.  Every  detail 
we  learn  only  increases  our  wonder  that  stentors  are  capable  of 
such  remarkable  feats  of  regeneration  and  reconstruction  after  the 
cutting  needle  comes  crashing  through  these  complex  and  highly 
organized  cell  differentiations. 

I.  Feeding  organelles 

The  differentiations  at  the  anterior  end  of  stentor  are  formed 
in  a  few  hours  from  an  oral  primordium  in  the  most  dramatic  act 
of  cytoplasmic  elaboration  shown  by  this  animal.  A  band  of 
membranelles  develops  on  the  side  of  the  cell  and  carves  out  an 
area  of  the  ventral  striping  to  the  right  which  it  carries  forward  to 
the  anterior  end,  as  the  posterior  terminus  of  the  band  invaginates 
to  form  the  gullet  and  the  adjacent  part  of  the  isolated  striping 
indents  to  produce  the  oral  pouch.  An  important  consideration 
is  whether  all  growth  and  elaboration  of  oral  parts  occurs  only 
through  primordium  development.  If  so,  the  size  and  number  of 
membranelles  should  not  increase  thereafter,  the  gullet  would  not 
increase  in  resting  diameter  or  length,  and  the  number  of  stripes 
in  the  frontal  field  should  remain  the  same  after  oral  differentiation 
regardless  of  increase  in  cell  volume  through  growth.  Indications 
that  this  may  be  the  case  are  found  in  the  fact  that  adoral  bands 
and  gullets  abbreviated  by  cutting  do  not  grow  out  again  in  situ 
but  initiate  regeneration  of  a  whole  new  set  of  feeding  organelles. 
But  in  regard  to  decrease  in  these  structures  through  dedifferentia- 
tion  and  resorption  the  situation  is  entirely  different,  for  the 
membranellar  band  and  gullet  can  shorten  in  situ  (see  p.  125). 


28 


FINE    STRUCTURE  2g 

(a)  Frontal  field 

The  granular  or  pigmented  stripes  of  this  area  are  narrow  and 
the  ciHary  rows  correspondingly  close  together,  not  only  because 
they  are  ventral  fine  stripes  shifted  forward,  but  also  because  there 
is  usually  an  extensive  formation  of  new  stripes  within  the  arc  of 
the  developing  membranellar  band.  Some  of  the  resulting  pigment 
stripes  in  coeruleus  may  be  so  narrow  as  to  consist  of  only  a  single 
row  of  granules.  The  disposition  of  the  frontal  striping  follows 
roughly  the  curve  of  the  membranellar  band  (Fig.  i).  Some  of  the 
stripes  end  at  the  border,  while  those  nearest  the  oral  side  continue 
as  the  lining  of  the  oral  pouch  and  proceed  downward  and  spiraling 
into  the  depths  of  the  gullet. 

Like  their  lateral  progenitors,  clear  stripes  of  the  frontal  field 
bear  rows  of  small  cilia,  and  contractile  myonemes  which  are  said 
to  be  finer  than  those  of  the  lateral  body  wall  and  without 
branchings  (Dierks,  1926a).  Stevens  (1903)  thought  that  the  frontal 
stripes  can  multiply  in  situ  and  not  only  alongside  the  developing 
primordium.  This  now  seems  unlikely  because  stripe  splitting 
within  the  field  is  not  observed.  Likewise,  when  for  some  reason 
the  stripes  fail  to  increase  adjacent  to  the  anlage,  the  frontal  field 
is  then  deficient  and  remains  so  until  corrected  by  a  later  re- 
organization or  re-regeneration. 

The  frontal  stripe  area  is  bordered  by  a  wider  clear  stripe 
followed  by  a  bordering  pigment  stripe  and  finally  the  membranel- 
lar band  itself  (see  Fig.  i).  According  to  Maier  (1903),  who  studied 
niger  but  says  that  coeruleus  is  the  same,  there  is  a  marginal  ciliary 
row  which  neither  Schuberg  nor  Johnson  noticed  on  the  clear 
border  stripe,  but  no  myoneme  underlies  it.  Schroder  (1907) 
seems  to  have  been  the  first  to  mention  the  pigmented  border 
stripe  in  coeruleus  though  Schuberg  (1890)  showed  it  in  his 
drawings ;  I  have  found  it  along  the  right  side  of  the  developing 
oral  primordium  when  presumably  the  clear  border  stripe  is  also 
laid  down. 

(b)  Oral  pouch 

In  some  species  (e.g.,  introversus  and  roeseli)  the  frontal  field 
simply  dips  downwards  like  a  ramp  and  forms  a  curved  trough 
leading  to  the  opening  of  the  gullet.  In  coeruleus  there  is  a  definite 
in-pocketing  such  that  the  pouch  curves  back  under  the  frontal 


30  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

field,  forming  what  Johnson  called  the  buccal  fold.  Oralward  the 
wall  of  the  pouch  lies  against  the  body  ectoplasm,  forming  a  thin 
wall  which  is  apparently  what  Johnson  called  the  "  velum  ". 
The  membranellar  margin  of  this  wall  bends  inward,  producing 
the  groove  which  Schuberg  emphasized,  and  is  capable,  by 
independent  contraction,  of  increasing  this  over-hang  or  nearly 
closing  off  the  cavity  below.  It  was  Schuberg  who  first  pointed  out 
that  the  oral  or  buccal  pouch  is  not  a  part  of  the  gullet  but  only  a 
modification  of  the  frontal  field,  which  later  experiments  confirmed 
(see  p.  172). 

(c)  Membranellar  band 

On  first  inspection  membranelles  appear  to  be  merely  large  cilia, 
and  so  they  seemed  to  Stein  (1867)  and  Simroth  (1876);  but  Sterki 
(1878)  first  noted  that  they  are  flat  plates.  Each  lamella  is  formed 
by  many  cilia  clinging  together  in  a  sheet,  presumably  by  the  inter- 
locking, as  in  the  barbules  of  a  feather,  of  lateral  spurs  recently 
demonstrated  through  electron  microscopy  by  Randall  and 
Jackson  (1958).  The  same  occurs  in  the  formation  of  cirri  in  hypo- 
trichs  (Roth,  1956).  All  students  had  agreed  that  each  membranelle 
in  stentors  was  made  up  of  2  rows  of  cilia  and  I  found  the  same 
in  silver-stained  polymorphus.  It  is  therefore  surprising  that 
Randall  and  Jackson  describe  from  clear  photographs  triple  rows 
for  the  same  species,  except  in  the  mouth  region.  This  discrepancy 
will  have  to  be  resolved.  It  is  possible  that  strains  could  differ  in 
this  respect  and  if  so  the  number  of  rows  could  be  an  important 
genetic  character.  In  the  ciliate  Oxytricha  membranelles  are  com- 
posed of  3  rows  of  cilia  (E.  E.  Lund,  1935). 

The  row  of  membranelles  is  held  together  by  some  sort  of  band 
or  fibers  at  the  level  of  the  ciliary  bases,  and  when  shed  in  salt 
solutions  the  membranelles  do  not  fall  apart  but  come  off  as  a 
continuous  ribbon  (Tartar,  1957a).  Schuberg  thought  this  union 
was  accomplished  by  thickened  pellicle;  Schroder  by  a  special 
meshwork  or  membrane.  Dierks  saw  a  fiber  (of  coordinating 
function  he  supposed)  connecting  the  membranelles  at  this  level, 
and  such  connectives  are  clear  in  the  electronmicrographs  of 
Randall  and  Jackson  but  afford  no  indication  of  whether  the 
fibers  are  supportive,  contractile,  or  coordinating.  If  isolated  by 
crushing,  Moxon  (1869)  saw  in  the  membranellar  band  "tremulous 


FINE    STRUCTURE  3I 

waves  passing  along  it  after  patches  of  cilia  were  detached  ",  but 
no  one  has  confirmed  this.  That  the  oral  lip  is  capable  of  indepen- 
dent contraction  Hke  a  sphincter  suggests  some  means  of  developing 
tension  in  the  transverse  direction.  Whether  actively  or  passively, 
the  membranelles  of  the  entire  band  do  come  closer  together 
when  the  frontal  field  is  contracted  (Randall  and  Jackson). 

Each  membranelle  has  an  extension  into  the  endoplasm. 
Difficult  to  observe,  the  structure  and  function  of  these  processes 
have  occasioned  conflicting  interpretations,  but  recent  studies  with 
the  electron  microscope  clarify  the  issues.  Schuberg  (1890,  1905) 
described  a  triangular  sheet  or  lamella  from  the  base  of  each 
membranelle,  apparently  bordered  by  two  converging  fibers  and 
narrowing  inward  to  an  apex  which  continued  as  an  end  fiber, 
while  the  end  fibers  of  all  the  membranelles  were  joined  together 
by  a  deep-lying  basal  fiber.  Most  workers  agreed  with  this  picture 
(excepting  Schroder,  Neresheimer,  and  Dierks)  and  EM  studies 
are  confirmatory.  Neresheimer  (1903)  interpreted  the  lamellae  as 
overlapping  plates  which  were  not  joined  by  a  continuous  fiber  and 
served  for  anchoring  the  membranelles.  This  view  was  expanded 
by  Dierks  (1926a)  who  described  the  lamellse  as  anchoring 
rectangles  with  a  twist  which  accounted  for  the  other  appearances 
including  the  basal  fiber.  In  the  light  of  the  EM  studies  this  view 
will  be  discarded,  and  also  it  may  be  added  that  in  shed 
membranellar  bands  nothing  like  these  plates  is  found,  as  would 
be  expected  if  they  had  sufficient  strength  to  serve  for  anchoring. 

Faure-Fremiet  and  Rouiller  (1955)  made  an  EM  study  of 
polymorphtis,  niger  and  coeruleus.  They  find  that  each  membranelle 
is  composed  of  two  short,  parallel  rows  of  ciliary  basal  granules  or 
kinetosomes  which  are  connected  to  each  other  laterally  and  give 
off  ciliary  rootlets  into  the  interior.  Each  bundle  of  rootlets  com- 
bines with  that  from  neighbouring  cilia  to  form  the  triangle 
Schuberg  described,  which  is  now  seen  to  be  of  a  fibrous  nature 
throughout.  Randall  and  Jackson  confirmed  this  picture  and  added 
new  details  (Fig.  5).  The  fibrils  in  the  triangular  bundle  are  fitted 
together  in  an  orderly  stacking.  These  fibrils  do  not  appear  to  be 
striated,  as  is  the  case  with  some  metazoan  ciliary  rootlets  (Fawcett 
and  Porter,  1954).  Continuing  inward,  the  fibrils  form  a  long 
bundle,  corresponding  to  Schuberg's  end  fiber,  and  these  are  in 
turn  joined  together  at  their  ends  by  a  composite  basal  fiber.  The 


32  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

connection  is  a  smooth  one,  fibrils  from  the  end  fiber  bending  and 
running  into  the  basal  fiber.  Photographic  evidence  of  these  points 
is  very  convincing.  The  whole  basal  structure  of  the  membranelle 
extends  for  about  20/x  into  the  endoplasm. 


cdi 


hineiosome 


Ciliary  roois 


membranelle 


memhranelLar  hand 


inke  r  memhranelUr 
connecliye 


jfooz  bundle 


Jbasal  liber 


Fig.  5.  Structure  of  membranelles  as  revealed  by  electron  micro- 
scopy. (After  Randall  and  Jackson,  1958.) 

The  function  of  this  intracellular  structure  of  the  membranelles 
has  been  variously  interpreted  as  contractile,  nutritive,  supportive, 
or  coordinating,  beginning  with  Brauer  (1885)  who  thought  the 
basal  fiber  a  muscle  which  contracted  the  whole  frontal  field. 
Maier  (1903)  modified  this  view  with  a  speculation  that  the  basal 
lamellae  retract  or  pull  the  membranelles  inward  while  the  basal 
fiber  draws  them  together;  but  the  membranelles  do  not  seem  to 
retract,  and  were  the  basal  fiber  contractile  it  would  only  pull  the 


FINE^STRUCTURE  33 

tips  of  the  end  fibers  together  without  necessarily  compacting  the 
membranelles. 

Neresheimer  (1903),  Schroder  (1907),  and  Dierks  (1926a)  all 
maintained  that  the  basal  lamellae  were  to  give  solidity  and  support 
as  anchors  for  the  powerfully  beating  membranelles.  It  is  difficult 
to  see  how  much  support  could  be  given  because  the  membranellar 
band  is  easily  sloughed  in  salt  solutions  and  when  it  comes  off 
there  is  no  sign  of  supporting  structure  below  the  membranelles. 

Schuberg  denied  a  muscular  function  for  the  basal  fiber  since 
it  is  thrown  into  convolutions  when  the  animal  is  contracted  and 
he  thought  that  the  basal  lamellae  could  achieve  little  anchoring 
in  a  fluid  endoplasm.  He  suggested  a  nutritive  function  for  the 
parts  he  described,  though  granting  there  was  still  no  proof  of 
this.  The  membranelles  start  and  stop  together  and  they  beat  in 
an  orderly  fashion,  one  firing  after  the  other  in  regular  series  to 
produce  a  metachronal  rhythm.  It  therefore  seemed  to  Johnson 
that  the  basal  fiber  with  its  connections  to  the  membranelles  would 
be  suited  to  a  coordinating  function.  But  even  this  reasonable 
interpretation  is  not  without  its  difficulties.  Neresheimer  found 
that  the  usual  nerve  anaesthetics  had  no  effect  on  ciliary  action  in 
Stentor ;  and  also,  if  the  membranellar  band  is  severed  deep  into 
the  interior,  metachronal  rhythm  continues  on  both  sides  of  the 
cut  although  the  basal  fiber  must  certainly  have  been  sundered. 

The  wide,  clear  marginal  stripe  of  the  frontal  field  running 
along  the  inner  margin  of  the  membranellar  band  should  not  be 
overlooked  as  a  possible  site  of  fibers  coordinating  the  membranellar 
beat.  Clear  stripes  elsewhere  carry  fibers  connecting  the  cilia,  and 
in  Stylonychia  the  membranelles  of  the  oral  region  are  apparently 
connected  by  a  lateral  fiber  (Chen,  1944). 

Although  the  electronmicrographs  give  no  indication  thereof, 
the  membranellar  band  shows  an  intrinsic  polarity.  Bands  or 
sections  of  bands  similarly  oriented  will  readily  join  and  mend 
together  without  a  break  but  not  otherwise,  and  reversed  mid- 
sections of  a  band  are  reincorporated  only  after  they,  invariably, 
rotate  180°  in  reorientation.  This  polarization  appears  during 
primordium  development.  The  primordium  can  be  cut  through 
transversely  in  many  places  without  effect,  the  severed  parts  merely 
heahng  together ;  but  if  a  sector  is  cut  out  and  replaced  in  reversed 
position  it  develops  separately  (see  Fig.  41K). 


34  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

From  the  complexity  of  its  structure  we  appreciate  that  the 
formation  of  the  membranellar  band  is  indeed  an  astonishing 
achievement  of  differentiation,  involving  multiplication  of  ciliary 
basal  bodies  to  15,000  (judging  from  the  data  of  Randall  and 
Jackson),  the  precise  alignment  of  these  bodies  in  rows  and  the 
grouping  of  these  rows  by  twos  or  threes,  outgrowth  of  long  cilia 
from  these  granules,  ingrowth  of  ciliary  rootlets  and  their  precise 
association  into  triangular  plates  ending  in  a  fiber,  together  with 
the  elaboration  of  the  basal  fiber  connecting  the  end  fibers,  not  to 
mention  the  coiling  and  shifting  of  the  entire  structure  to  the 
anterior  end.  All  this  occurs  within  about  4  hours.  The  perform- 
ance is  the  more  remarkable  in  view  of  the  fact  that  when  the 
membranellar  band  is  forming  it  can  be  slashed  through  many 
times  with  a  glass  needle  without  producing  any  apparent  abnor- 
mality of  construction  (Tartar,  1957c). 

(d)  Gullet 

The  membranellar  band  continues  in  a  sharply  spiraled  course 
down  into  the  gullet,  as  does  the  ectoplasmic  striping  which  lines 
the  oral  pouch  and  is  itself  continuous  with  the  stripes  of  the  frontal 
field.  Opening  into  the  right-hand  side  of  the  oral  pouch,  the  gullet 
shows  a  double  spiraling:  as  a  pendant  tube  it  takes  about  one 
complete  turn  as  it  penetrates  into  the  endoplasm,  while  the  wall 
of  the  gullet  is  itself  under  sharp  torsion.  Dierks  claimed  that  the 
opening  into  the  gullet  is  capable  of  closure,  though  no  one  else 
has  observed  this. 

In  everted  gullets  of  coeruleus  Andrews  (1946)  saw  the  membran- 
ellar band  extending  in  a  spiral  to  the  lower  end  of  the  gullet, 
while  decreasing  to  half  its  usual  width  (Fig.  6a).  In  polymorphus, 
Randall  and  Jackson  describe  the  membranelles  in  this  region 
as  bi-  instead  of  tri-lamellar.  In  pigmented  species  the  appearance 
is  often  that  only  one  side  of  the  gullet  is  colored  because  the  band 
of  membranelles  is  itself  unpigmented.  However,  Dierks  main- 
tained, apparently  erroneously,  that  the  membranellar  band  does 
not  continue  into  the  gullet.  In  any  case,  the  gullet  has  its  own 
specialized  ciliation.  Gelei  (1925)  found  that  the  ciUa  here  stained 
differently,  and  he  likened  them  to  the  pharyngeal  cilia  of  turbel- 
larian  worms  which  serve  in  swallowing.  Dierks  even  denied  that 
the  kinetics  of  the  frontal  field  continue  into  the  gullet,  being 


FINE    STRUCTURE  35 

interrupted  where  new  types  of  cilia  begin.  The  latter  investigator 
made  fine  distinctions  regarding  the  gullet  tube.  Its  entrance  he 
called  the  cytostome  which  leads  into  a  short  passage  called  the 
pharynx  separated  by  a  ridge  from  the  extensive  remaining  portion 


orsLpomUx 


stomal  Rim. 

narrovj'm^  inembrandUa.r  baiui 


frontal  Jield 


myoneme. 


C^laslome 


Fig.  6,    Structure  of  the  gullet  of  5.  coernleus. 

A.  Exposure  of  gullet  everted  by  pressure.    (After  Andrews, 

1946.). 

B.  Schematic    course    of  myonemes    in    the    gullet    lining, 
affording  possiblity  of  peristalsis.    (After  Dierks,  1926a.) 


or  esophagus.  Each  of  these  parts  was.described  as  having  its  own 
special  ciliation:  the  ''cytostomial"  cilia  look  like  the  pharyngeals 
but  have  the  special  function  of  selecting  the  food  particles,  and 
the  esophageal  ciUa  were  said  to  be  different,  the  distance  between 
cilia  increasing  as  they  are  followed  down  into  the  gullet.  Andrews 
agrees  with    Dierks   that   in   the   profundity  of  the   gullet   the 


36  THE  BIOLOGY  OF  STENTOR 

membranelles  take  the  form  of  isolated  cilia  not  joined  in  sheets. 

Dierks  granted,  however,  that  the  myonemes  of  the  frontal 
field  are  continuous  into  the  gullet,  proceeding  uninterrupted  and 
in  a  sharply  spiraled  course  to  its  terminus  and  also,  as  in  the 
frontal  field  itself,  showing  no  branchings  (Fig.  6b).  In  the  gullet 
the  myonemes  become  much  thicker  and  presumably  stronger, 
according  to  Gelei,  and  their  disposition  more  or  less  transverse  to 
the  length  of  the  gullet  could  provide  for  the  peristaltic  movements 
in  swallowing  which  have  been  observed.  Gelei  also  described  a 
fibrous  net  surrounding  the  gullet,  which  he  thought  might  serve 
both  to  prevent  the  gullet  from  tearing  when  stretched  and  to 
coordinate  cilia  and  myonemes  in  a  swallowing  action.  Such  an 
appearance  may  have  been  due  to  the  system  of  vacuoles  and  inter- 
spersed fibers  found  near  the  gullet  by  Randall  and  Jackson. 
These  numerous  vacuoles  have  double  or  triple  membranes  and 
it  was  therefore  suggested  that  they  might  be  formed  by  invagin- 
ations from  the  gullet  wall,  as  in  the  pinoc3rtosis  of  Amoeba.  The 
adjacent  fibers  run  rather  deeply  into  the  interior  and  may 
represent  the  pharyngeal  fibers  of  Schuberg. 

Following  Schuberg  we  shall  call  the  inner  terminus  of  the 
gullet  the  cytostome.  Again  in  everted  gullets,  Andrews  (1946) 
saw  the  cytostome  as  a  thin,  clear  membrane  without  visible  struc- 
ture which  prevents  the  escape  or  regurgitation  of  endoplasm. 
Dangling  inward  from  the  periphery  of  this  cytostome  he  found  the 
long  fibers  described  by  Schuberg  but  not  seen  as  such  by  others, 
and  he  thought  that  they  formed  part  of  a  permanent  canal  which 
guides  and  might  even  propel  ingested  food  into  the  endoplasm. 
By  Andrews'  account,  ingestion  may  occur  in  one  of  three  ways : 
small  particles  may  collect  at  the  bottom  of  the  gullet  and  push  out 
the  stomal  film  until  it  breaks  off  as  a  membrane  surrounding 
them;  the  film  may  be  momentarily  broken  as  objects  like  small 
rotifers  pass  directly  into  the  endoplasm;  or  the  film  may  be 
missing  as  the  cytostome  opens  wide  to  admit  larger  organisms 
or  clots  of  food.  In  the  last  two  cases  the  ingested  animals  thrash 
around  freely  in  the  endoplasm  but  eventually  are  encased  in  a 
food  vacuole  and  die.  I  once  found  a  stentor  that  had  ingested  a 
cotton  fiber  with  one  end  still  protruding  forward  out  of  the  gullet 
and  the  other  end  passing  through  the  cell  and  emerging  through 
the  surface  near  the  posterior  end. 


FINE    STRUCTURE  37 

2.  Holdfast 

A  history  of  our  knowledge  of  stentor's  anchoring  organ  is  given 
in  Andrews'  (1945)  most  complete  account  of  this  organelle,  which 
confirmed  and  extended  the  early  observations  of  Gruber  (1878). 
Stein  (1876)  thought  that  stentors  fastened  in  part  by  means  of  a 
tiny  suction  cup.  This  idea  was  revived  by  Dierks  (1926a)  who 
described  the  myonemes  as  not  continuing  all  the  way  to  the 
posterior  pole  but  leaving  the  ectoplasm  near  the  tail  end  to  turn 
inward  toward  the  center  of  the  cell  where  they  took  another  bend 
as  they  joined  together  to  make  a  bundle  pointing  forward.  The 
result  was  a  cone  of  contractile  elements  open  toward  the  terminal 
pole.  Assuming  that  the  recurved  ends  of  the  myonemes  are 
independently  contractile  while  their  anterior  extensions  remain 
wholly  relaxed,  and  that  the  posterior  end  of  the  animal  could 
somehow  produce  a  tightly  adhering  cup,  he  conceived  that  this 
arrangement  produces  a  suction  which  is  the  principal  means  of 
attachment.  This  scheme  is  highly  dubitable.  In  the  first  place, 
the  study  was  made  on  killed  and  contracted  animals,  unattached. 
Second,  stentors  can  attach  to  the  surface  film  where  suction 
should  not  be  eflFective.  Finally,  among  the  other  assumptions 
mentioned,  this  conception  was  based  on  the  questionable  pre- 
supposition that  amoeboid  processes  with  sticky  substances  could 
not  account  for  the  firmness  of  adhesion  which  is  observed. 
Schroder  (1907),  however,  also  described  myonemes  as  recurved 
at  the  posterior  end,  but  he  did  not  advance  the  suction  idea. 
Instead,  in  the  cone  before-mentioned,  he  defined  a  special 
cytoplasm  from  which  the  attaching  organ  was  presumed  to  be 
elaborated.  I  have  sometimes  observed  the  "  hem  "  or  sharp  bend 
in  the  cell  contour  toward  the  posterior  end  which  Dierks  des- 
cribed as  indicating  where  the  myonemes  turn  inward  but  other- 
wise found  no  confirming  indications  of  his  description  in  living 
material.  Whether  Schroder's  and  Dierks'  recurved  myonemes 
are  artifacts  of  fixation  can  only  be  decided  by  successful  preserva- 
tion of  animals  in  the  fully  extended^  state. 

Johnson  (1893)  figured  the  myonemes  as  running  without 
deviation  to  the  posterior  pole  and  hence  his  conception  of  attach- 
ment was  quite  diff"erent.  Body  striping  was  described,  however, 
as  not  continuing  all  the  way  to  the  pole  itself  but  stopping  short 
to  leave  a  small  terminal  area  which,  because  of  its  absence  of 


38  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

Structure,  he  designated  questionably  as  endoplasm.  This  would 
correspond  to  the  polar  plasma  later  described  by  Schroder.  Weisz, 
too,  (1948a)  emphasized  that  the  posterior  end  is  clear  and 
structureless,  but  Dierks  denied  that  there  is  any  such  '*  naked 
protoplasm  ".  Probably  the  pellucid  polar  endoplasm  is  responsible 
for  this  illusion.  Rather  it  would  seem  that  granular  stripes,  ciliary 
rows  and  myonemes  cannot  continue  all  the  way  to  a  fine  point 
without  an  improbable  anastamosis  of  unlike  elements  and  that 
therefore  at  the  posterior  end  the  construction  would  not  be  strictly 
closed  but  allow  an  opening  for  extrusions. 

The  manner  of  attachment  may  vary  with  the  nature  of  the 
substratum.  To  clean  glass,  according  to  Johnson,  terminal  proto- 
plasm adheres  as  a  smooth  disc ;  against  slime,  pointed  pseudopods 
are  given  out  from  this  disc ;  and  in  attachment  to  the  surface  film 
pseudopods  become  broad  and  branching  as  Andrews  later  des- 
cribed more  fully.  Johnson  also  observed  that  stentors  never  attach 
until  stretched  out  and  that  the  terminal  cilia  seem  to  feel  about 
for  a  place  of  attachment. 

Enlarging  much  on  these  observations,  Andrews  (1945) 
described  that  in  the  outstretched  stentor  seeking  attachment  the 
posterior  cilia  on  the  stalk  come  to  a  stop  projecting  outward  while 
the  terminal  ciUa,  somewhat  like  the  scopula  of  a  vorticeUid, 
remain  active,  possibly  seeking  a  favorable  spot  or  effecting  a 
preliminary  attachment.  By  focusing  downward  on  the  foot  of 
stentors  attaching  to  glass  wool  or  a  cover  slip  he  was  able  to  give 
the  most  complete  account  of  the  holdfast,  one  which  also  has 
interesting  implications  concerning  the  relationship  between  cilia 
and  pseudopodia.  An  amoeboid  disc  of  naked  cytoplasm  is  first 
extruded  from  the  posterior  end  to  adhere  by  its  stickiness,  and 
some  of  the  posterior  cilia  are  apparently  transformed  into  viscid, 
rigid,  acicular  pseudopods  which  he  called  "  radiants".  (If  this 
does  indeed  occur  it  carries  the  surprising  imphcation,  contradic- 
tory to  the  hypothesis  of  the  French  school  (see  Lwoff,  1950)  that 
formed  cilia  can  transform  into  something  else  without  new 
growth  from  a  kinetosome  specifically  determined  to  produce  such 
a  structure.)  Meanwhile  some  of  the  terminal  cilia  remain  active 
("undulants")  but  these  gradually  disappear  with  continued 
attachment.  Then  the  adjacent  ectoplasm  with  its  pigmented 
stripes  and  ciliary  rows  is  drawn  out  into  extensive  projections  like 


FINE    STRUCTURE  39 

pseudopodia  which  he  called  ''radicules"  (Fig.  7A).  This  would 
account  for  the  observation  that  coeruleus  even  at  low  magnification 
shows  a  green,  stellate  foot.  In  side  view  after  long  attachment 
Andrews  observed  that  the  stentor  is  chiefly  anchored  by  the 


ackulsir  psevudopod :  j-a^a.nt 


Fig.  7.   Holdfast  of  S.  coeruleus. 

A.    Underside   of  attaching   holdfast,    showing   ectoplasmic 
projections   ("radicules")   and  active,   undulating  cilia  said  to 
convert  into  thicker,  acicular,  attaching  pseudopods. 
B.    Side  view.    (After  Andrews,  1945.) 

acicular  and  lobose  pseudopodial  processes,  Hke  a  balloon  anchored 
by  ropes  (Fig.  7B),  the  openings  between  which  would  preclude 
any  suction.  If  forcibly  detached,  the  holdfast  remains  somewhat 
intact  for  a  while  and  is  so  sticky  that  if  touched  with  a  needle 
adherence  is  firm  and  immediate.  But  later,  or  when  the  animal 
detaches  itself  at  will,  the  holdfast  is  withdrawn.  Then,  according 
to  Andrews,  its  structural  parts  resume  their  former  forms  and 
functions,  which  would  imply  that  the  striping  of  the  pseudopods 
again  takes  the  form  of  the  posterior  cell  wall  and  the  aciculars 
transform  back  into  cilia.  However  this  may  be,  it  follows  that 
structureless  cytoplasm  is  not  the  sine  qua  non  of  attachment. 


40  THE  BIOLOGY  OF  STENTOR 

Johnson  surmised  that  the  pedal  opening  could  be  used  for  the 
extrusion  of  pigment  granules  but  in  this  he  could  have  been  mis- 
led by  appearances,  as  Weisz  (1949a)  noted,  since  the  stickiness  of 
the  detached  holdfast  is  likely  to  pick  up  debris,  including  cast-off 
pigment.  However,  Weisz  stated  that  the  discontinuity  of  the 
ectoplasm  at  the  foot  can  be  used  for  the  ejection  of  such  waste 
as  the  undigested  pellicles  of  paramecia. 

3.  Cytopyge 

Undigested  material  is  usually  collected  and  extruded  at  a  single 
site  on  the  anterior  left  side,  just  below  and  to  the  left  of  the 
opening  of  the  contractile  vacuole.  As  Johnson  first  described  the 
process,  the  spent  food  vacuoles,  if  small,  accumulate  by  fusion 
in  this  place.  The  pellicle  then  ruptures  within  one  of  the  broad 
granular  bands  and  the  waste  is  slowly  defecated  as  the  slit  opens, 
often  so  widely  as  to  distort  the  adjacent  striping;  thereupon 
closing  without  leaving  a  trace. 

Whether  the  cytopyge  has  a  persisting  structure  is  still  in  ques- 
tion. Moxon  (1869)  could  find  no  pore  but  said  the  spot  was 
marked  by  an  irregularity  in  one  or  two  of  the  granular  stripes  and 
Johnson  found  no  fixed  organelle,  but  Andrews  (1946)  made  out 
a  long  slit  with  definite  lips.  Nevertheless,  it  is  certain  that  defeca- 
tion can  occur  in  other  places,  as  Johnson  first  observed.  I  twice 
observed  coeruleus  ejecting  solid  material  in  the  normal  manner 
simultaneously  at  two  points  far  distant  from  the  normal  site 
(Fig.  8a).  Defecation  openings  break  or  open  through  granular 
stripes,  clear  stripes  carrying  too  much  structure  to  permit  exit. 

4.  Contractile  vacuole 

Stentors  have  but  one  contractile  vacuole  always  located  at  the 
left  anterior  side  of  the  cell.  The  structure  of  this  excretory  system 
seems  to  be  less  well-developed  than  in  Paramecium  in  spite  of  the 
fact  that  Stentors  are  much  larger,  e.g.,  there  are  no  star  shaped 
canals  and  Haye  (1930)  found  few  lipoid  granules  associated  with 
this  system.  Walls  of  the  contractile  vacuole  were  not  blackened  in 
osmic  acid  (Park,  1929).  Schwalbe  (1866)  is  said  to  have  been  the 
first  to  see  the  excretory  pore,  in  polymorphus.  With  its  pigmenta- 
tion, coeruleus  shows  this  part  more  clearly  and  Moxon  described 
the  presence  of  two  or  three  unpigmented  spots  in  the  colored 


FINE    STRUCTURE  4I 

bands  over  the  vacuole,  one  of  which  opens  widely  to  void  its 
content.  Independently,  Maupas  (1883)  discovered  these  spots 
which  are  evidence  of  persisting  pores.  Andrews  (1948b)  noted 
that  rarely  two  pores  may  open  at  the  same  time  as  well  as  that 
the  arrangement  of  the  spots  may  vary  in  different  individuals  or 
in  the  same  specimen  at  different  times.  The  presence  of  these 
pores  is  easily  confirmed  (Fig.  8b). 


CM 


B 


Fig.  8.    Excretion  in  S.  coeruleus. 

A.  Specimen   showing  location   of  contractile  vacuole   and 
normal  site  of  cytopyge  (i)  but  also  excreting  from  a  second 

opening  (2). 

B.  Multiple  pores  in  granular  stripes,  one  of  which  is  excret- 
ing  contents   of   the    underlying    contractile   vacuole.     (After 

Andrews,  1948b.) 

All  students  agree  that  the  vacuole  increases  in  size  by  the 
confluence  of  smaller  vacuoles  or  at  least  by  the  draining  of  their 
fluid  contents  into  the  contractile  vacuole.  Although  not  as  evident 
as  in  paramecia,  a  system  of  collecting  channels  has  been  des- 
cribed. In  coeruleus,  Maupas  found  variable  canals  formed  by  the 
alignment  of  adventitious  vacuoles  which  presumably  ran  together 
and  pushed  their  fluid  toward  the  contractile  vacuole.  Johnson 
confirmed  this  picture  and  maintained  that  in  divisions  one  of  a 
pedally  directed  line  of  vacuoles  becomes  the  contractile  vacuole 
of  the  posterior  daughter  cell,  even  before  separation  beginning  to 
contract  regularly  but  not  in  synchrony  with  the  old  one  and 
acquiring  excretory  pores  in  the  pigment  stripes  above.  Johnson 
also  described  a  definite  longitudinal  canal  in  roeseli,  recalling  that 


42  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

in  Spirostomuniy  in  which  also  the  new  vacuole  is  produced  at 
division  simply  by  an  enlargement  of  this  canal.  Anterior  to  the 
new  vacuole  a  segment  of  the  longitudinal  canal  separates  both 
from  this  vacuole  and  from  the  posterior  end  of  the  anterior 
daughter,  producing  the  circumoral  "  ring  canal "  discovered  by 
Lachmann  (Claparede  and  Lachmann,  1 858-1861)  ;  but  this 
severed  portion  of  the  canal  soon  atrophies  and  hence  is  seen  only 
in  the  young  opisthe.  Haye  stated  that  polymorphus  also  has  a 
longitudinal  canal  but  he  did  not  describe  or  illustrate  it.  In 
coenileus  Andrews  saw  many  channels  emanating  from  the 
contractile  vacuole.  One  proceeded  forward  and  led  to  a  horizontal 
ring  canal  underlying  the  frontal  field ;  others  proceeded  backward 
toward  the  foot  and  from  such  might  come  the  new  contractile 
vacuole  during  fission. 

5.  Cortical  structure 

The  well-differentiated  cortex  or  ectoplasm  of  Stentor  is  highly 
extensible,  considerably  elastic,  sharply  contractile,  capable  in 
part  of  being  shed  and  regenerated,  as  well  as  bearing  cilia  with 
the  means  of  their  coordination.  These  properties  and  functions 
are  to  be  related  to  the  types  of  microscopic  and  submicroscopic 
structure  present.  Even  today  our  knowledge  of  this  correlation 
is  still  highly  problematical;  nor  is  it  certain  that  all  structural 
details  have  been  revealed,  though  electron  microscopy  has  made 
possible  astonishing  advances  in  this  study. 

From  the  standpoint  of  morphogenesis,  the  cell  cortex  with  its 
enduring  pattern  is  of  greatest  importance.  For  it  is  from  this  layer 
that  other  cytoplasmic  organelles  are  elaborated,  as  when  a  mid- 
section fragment  regenerates  a  new  head  and  foot.  As  will  become 
evident  later,  both  holdfast  and  oral  primordium  formation  are 
intimately  related  to  the  polarity  and  pattern  of  the  cortex,  and 
we  may  hope  that  the  causal  basis  of  this  relationship  will  in  time 
be  exposed. 

(a)  The  cell  surface 

Proceeding  from  the  exterior,  there  is  a  pellicle,  long  ago 
demonstrated  by  Johnson  who  saw  it  lift  off  the  cell  on  treatment 
with  weak  osmic  acid  while  remaining  firmly  attached  to  the  ciliary 
rows.  Electronmicrographs  of  Randall  and  Jackson  showed  the 


FINE    STRUCTURE  43 

pellicle  to  be  a  double  or  perhaps  even  a  triple  membrane,  joined 
to  the  body  cilia  because  continuous  with  their  outer  walls.  When 
the  pellicle  is  elevated  the  cytoplasm  does  not  flow  out  into  the 
spaces  provided  and  hence  there  is  another  film,  the  plasma 
membrane,  which  was  also  shown  to  be  double.  One  may  regard 
the  pellicle  as  being  a  somewhat  dispensable  secretion  of  the  cell 
because  salt  treatments  often  produce  the  shedding  of  a  layer  which 
is  presumably  the  outermost,  but  the  stentor  remains  intact, 
appears  not  to  be  significantly  affected,  and  probably  re-secretes 
the  layer.  These  remarks  are  demonstrably  true  for  Blepharisma 
(Nadler,  1929). 

In  cross-sections  of  contracted  stentors  the  surface  is  thrown 
into  a  series  of  ridges  parallel  to  the  longitudinal  axis  of  the  cell. 
Each  ridge  represents  one  of  the  granular  or  pigmented  stripes 
("  Rippenstreifen "  of  Butschli)  while  the  alternating  valleys  are 
the  clear  stripes  (Zwischenstreifen).  The  bases  of  the  rows  of  body 
ciUa  are  implanted  along  the  (animal's)  left  side  of  each  valley  or 
clear  stripe. 

It  was  early  noticed  that  on  contraction  the  stripes  of  pigmented 
or  non-pigmented  granules  are  thrown  into  folds,  transverse 
ridges,  or  crenulations  while  the  clear  stripes  are  not.  Schroder 
remarked  that  this  pleating  may  cause  the  granules  to  be  aligned 
in  rows,  which  indicates  that  these  particles  have  some  freedom 
of  displacement.  Hence  the  original  deception  that  these  bands 
were  striated  muscles.  The  appearance  described  impHes  that  the 
pellicle  has  a  limited  elasticity,  at  least  over  the  granular  stripes, 
and  that  it  is  more  elastic  or  simply  pinned  down  in  the  region  of 
the  clear  stripes. 

Presumably  there  is  a  break  in  the  pellicle  permitting  extrusion 
at  the  holdfast  and  no  pellicle  over  the  cytostome. 

(b)  Granular  stripes:  nature  of  the  pigment  and  granules 
As  already  described  in  Chapter  II,  the  ectoplasm  is  chiefly 
characterized  by  alternating  clear  and -granular  longitudinal  stripes 
or  bands.  In  colored  stentors  the  granules  are  pigmented,  giving 
the  appearance  of  pigmented  stripes.  These  stripes  seem  to  be 
without  specialized  structures  other  than  the  granules  located  in 
them ;  but  the  clear  bands  mark  the  site  of  complex  differentiations, 
including  not  only  the  ciliary  rows  but  also  a  band  which  in  living 


44  THE  BIOLOGY  OF  STENTOR 

animals  is  often  seen  to  be  thrown  into  transverse  waves  or  convo- 
lutions. Therefore,  the  granular  stripes  appear  to  be  merely  fill-ins 
where  surface  granules  come  to  occupy  spaces  left  between  the 
structured  clear  bands  and  membranelles.  Accordingly,  it  is  the 
granular  and  not  the  clear  stripes  which  should  have  been  called 
mere  "  between-stripes  "  ("  Zwischenstreifen  ")  even  though  they 
are  more  obvious  to  the  eye.  Moxon,  for  instance,  found  that  in 
crushed  coeruleus  the  pigment  stripes  disperse  while  the  clear 
bands  persist  as  refractile  structures,  and  Schroder  remarked  the 
same.  The  great  change  in  width  of  the  former  speaks  for  the  same 
conclusion,  contrasting  with  the  uniformity  of  the  clear  stripes. 
When  the  area  of  ectoplasm  in  coeruleus  is  greatly  reduced,  the 
patch  remaining  stretches  to  cover  the  whole  and  this  stretching 
occurs  mainly  in  the  pigmented  stripes  which  become  very  broad 
(Fig.  9a).  Furthermore,  where  stripe  increase  occurs  it  can  be  seen 
that  the  pigmented  bands  adapt  in  width  and  contour  to  the 
exigencies  of  the  situation  (Fig.  9B),  which  would  not  be  the  case 
if  they  had  to  maintain  a  uniform  and  stable  structure. 

These  stripes  are  characterized  by  uniform,  spheroid  inclusions 
about  ijLt  in  diameter.  They  are  not  fixed  in  place  but  capable  of  a 
certain  freedom  of  movement  (Andrews,  1946)  which  Weisz 
(1949a)  called  Brownian  motion.  In  all  colored  species  the 
pigmentation  is  probably  confined  to  these  granules  (though 
S.  Felici  was  differently  described),  for  there  is  not  a  second  set 
of  uncolored  bodies.  That  cortical  granules  seem  to  be  present  in 
uncolored  stentors  indicates  that  they  serve  some  purpose  besides 
pigmentation.  When  pigmented,  some  granules  can  also  be  identi- 
fied in  the  interior  of  the  cell ;  and  Weisz  indicated  this  to  be  the 
main  site  of  a  putative  metabolic  function,  the  granules  being 
stored,  as  it  were,  in  the  ectoplasm  and  loosed  into  the  interior  to 
be  utilized  during  starvation  and  regeneration.  Within  the  interior 
of  coeruleus,  Andrews  (1955)  reported  that  the  pigment  granules 
move  between  the  endoplasmic  vesicles  as  if  gliding  along  films, 
by  a  movement  not  yet  explained. 

Granules  can  also  be  cast  off  to  the  exterior  by  the  action  of 
mild  irritants  (see  p.  250).  This  effect  resembles  the  discharge  of 
trichocysts,  which  are,  however,  always  spindle-form.  Hence 
the  granules  have  been  called  protrichocysts  by  Prowazek  (1904), 
Kahl  (1935),  and  Faure-Fremiet  et  al.  (1956). 


FINE    STRUCTURE  45 

Extensive  studies  on  pigment  granules  in  coeruleus  were  made 
by  Weisz  (1949a,  1950a).  He  found  them  to  have  a  basophiUc  core 
of  protein  pigment,  surrounded  by  a  phosphoHpid  shell,  and  to 
give  a  negative  test  for  RNA  but  positive  for  cytochrome  oxidase. 


A  B 

Fig.  9.    Granular  stripes  adapting  to  space  available. 

A.  Specimen  from  which  most  of  ectoplasm  was  removed, 
granular  stripes  of  the  patch  stretching  to  cover  the  endoplasm. 

The  animal  then  regenerated. 

B .  Photograph  showing  granular  striping  of  nonuniform  width 

and  contour  according  to  the  space  provided. 

The  bright  red  appearance  of  these  green  particles  in  reflected  light 
he  attributed  to  phase  interference  by  the  outer  shell.  Andrews 
(1946)  regarded  the  pigment  granules  of  coeruleus  as  not  mito- 
chondrial; but  Weisz  concluded  that  they,  as  well  as  those  of 
Blepharisma,  are  mitochondria,  basing  this  on  their  enzymatic 
content,  lipo-protein  composition,  apparent  involvement  in 
metabolism,  and  especially  their  selectivity  for  Janus  green  B  stain 
(with  no  other  bodies  so  staining).  Admittedly  it  was  difficult  to 
make  distinctions  in  staining  a  green  body  green. 

A  better  test  is  the  demonstration  of  villiform  interior  structure 
typical  of  the  protozoan  mitochondrion.  The  electronmicrographs 
of  Faure-Fremiet  et  al.  (1956)  and  Randall  and  Jackson  (1958) 
clearly  reveal  mitochondria  in  stentors,  but  these  bodies  appear  too 


46  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

large  and  much  too  few  in  number  to  correspond  to  the  ecto- 
plasmic  granules.  It  is  possible  that  the  latter,  if  they  do  in  fact 
contain  an  oxidase,  may  be  a  new  type  of  oxidative  center  different 
from  mitochondria,  located  next  to  the  ciliary  rows  to  assist  in 
their  energy  metabolism.  Such  alternating  rows  of  ''mitochondria" 
and  cilia  have  been  described  in  other  cihates  by  Horning  (1927) 
and  Turner  (1940).  Clearly,  the  function  of  these  granules  calls  for 
further  investigation.  However  these  questions  may  be  resolved, 
Andrews  was  probably  right  in  saying  that  the  degree  of  pigmenta- 
tion is  a  delicate  indicator  of  the  physiological  state  in  stentors 
(see  p.  274).  Healthy  coeruleus  capable  of  long  survival  on  slides  are 
invariably  well  colored. 

Nothing  is  known  concerning  the  origin  of  the  bodies  in  the 
granular  stripes.  In  the  blue  Folliculina  ampulla,  closely  related 
to  stentors,  Faure-Fremiet  (1932)  found  many  blue  granules  very 
close  to  the  macronucleus  yet  he  did  not  suggest  that  they  were  of 
nuclear  origin.  Stentor  coeruleus  also  frequently  shows  pigmented 
granules  surrounding  the  macronuclear  nodes.  Perhaps  it  is 
relevant  to  mention  that  when  I  grafted  a  nearly  colorless  coeruleus 
to  another  which  was  deeply  pigmented  the  fusion  mass  became 
well  pigmented  throughout  in  the  course  of  4  hours,  far  more 
rapidly  than  in  the  usual  regeneration  of  pigment  in  faded  stentors 
left  to  themselves.  A  closer  following  of  such  cases  as  well  as  of  the 
regeneration  of  pigment  in  animals  which  have  been  artificially 
depigmented  through  chemical  treatments,  or  of  similar  studies  on 
colorless  stentors  in  which  the  granules  have  been  artificially 
sloughed,  would  seem  to  offer  considerable  possibilities  for 
obtaining  clues  regarding  their  origin. 

The  chemical  nature  of  the  pigments  themselves  is  of  interest. 
Of  these  there  seem  to  be  three,  as  Johnson  remarked :  the  blue- 
green  which  gives  the  name  to  coeruleus  and  is  probably  also  found 
in  the  similarly  colored  introversus,  multiformis  and  amethystinus, 
if  not  in  the  related  blue  Folliculinids ;  the  brown  pigment  in  niger 
and  possibly  also  in  Johnson's  nigricans  variety  of  S.  igneus;  and  a 
purplish-red  in  igneus  which  may  be  the  same  as  the  zoopurpurin 
of  Blepharisma.  Only  the  first  two  have  so  far  been  studied. 

The  pigment  of  coeruleus  was  given  the  name  "stentorin"  by 
Lankester  (1873)  in  a  pioneer  work  in  which  he  remarked  the 
extraordinary  stability  of  this  substance,  not  dissolved  by  fat 


FINE    STRUCTURE  47 

solvents,  acids,  or  alkalis.  But  Prowazek  (1904)  found  that 
sulphuric  acid  turned  it  red,  potassium  hydroxide  caused  it  to 
become  grass-green  and  osmic  salts  changed  it  to  black.  Weisz 
(1950a)  could  bleach  stentorin  with  chlorine  gas  or  potassium 
permanganate  followed  by  oxalic  acid.  Stentors  of  this  species 
appear  red  by  reflected  light  and  blue-green  by  transmitted  (see 
frontispiece),  which  is  also  the  appearance  of  blue  Folliculinids 
(Andrews,  1923).  Correspondingly,  Lankester  demonstrated  two 
strong  absorption  bands,  one  in  the  red  and  one  in  the  green. 

Prowazek  grew  coeruleus  at  higher  than  normal  temperatures 
and  one  of  the  effects  he  reported  was  that  the  animals  often 
became  more  reddish  and  showed  fluorescence,  warming  in 
general  producing  deeper  hues  of  color.  He  also  found  that  most 
animals  which  feed  on  coeruleus  do  not  digest  the  pigment,  though 
the  color  may  be  altered  somewhat  in  passage  through  the  alimen- 
tary canal,  as  specifically  confirmed  by  Gelei  (1925)  for  the  worm 
Stenostomum.  Only  certain  species  of  a  worm(?),  Nuclearian, 
which  grew  in  some  of  Prowazek's  stentor  cultures  could  assimilate 
their  pigment  and  become  colored  throughout.  Cannibalizing 
stentors  do  not  assimilate  the  pigment  of  their  own  species  but 
concentrate  and  eject  it  as  a  dark  green  excretion  vacuole,  according 
to  Gelei  (1925)  and  Andrew^s  (1955),  and  this  has  also  been  my 
impression.  So  also  in  the  resorption  of  oral  parts  in  the  trans- 
formation of  Folliculinids  the  blue  pigment  granules  are  not 
metaboHzed  (Faure-Fremiet,  1932;  Andrews,  1949). 

In  niger,  Maier  (1903)  noted  that  the  yellow  pigment  was  of  the 
granules  and  could  be  dissolved  by  chloroform  to  give  a  red 
solution.  This  unique  pigment  was  later  studied  by  Barbier, 
Faure-Fremiet,  and  Lederer  (1956),  who  found  it  to  be  soluble  in 
alcohol  and  of  two  components.  A  minor  component  was  brown  in 
color  and  eluted  by  ether.  The  major  portion,  eluted  by  ether  with 
2%  ethanol,  was  a  substance  of  red-violet  color  which  they  called 
''  stentorol ".  The  latter  could  be  dried  to  a  dark  powder,  showing 
in  ultraviolet  a  red  fluorescence  which  was  changed  to  yellow  or 
blue  after  various  treatments.  Absorption  spectra  were  obtained 
using  diflferent  solvents,  leading  to  the  identification  of  the  pigment 
as  a  polycyclic  hydroxyquinone.  They  were  impressed  by  the 
resemblance  to  hypericum,  a  photodynamic  substance  originally 
discovered  in  plants  of  that  name. 


48  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

The  nature  of  the  pigment  in  the  cortical  granules  of  coeruleus 
has  been  reinvestigated  and  much  enlarged  upon  by  K.  M.  Moller 
(i960).  Instead  of  Lankester's  (1873)  spectrometric  absorption 
maxima  of  662  m/x  and  562  m/x  he  found  with  living  or  extracted 
stentors,  only,  a  strong  band  at  618,  a  weaker  one  at  568,  and  a 
third  and  very  weak  band  at  527  m/x.  This  difference  can  be 
explained  on  the  basis  that  Lankester  used  stentors  concentrated 
in  the  gut  of  an  aquatic  worm,  which  may  have  ingested  photo- 
synthetic  organisms  as  well  or  even  S.  polymorphus  with  its  algal 
symbionts.  Stentorin  itself  does  not  resemble  chlorophyll;  and 
tests  by  Moller  and  C.  Chapman-Andresen  demonstrated  that  it 
has  no  photosynthetic  action :  coeruleus  grown  in  the  light  do  not 
incorporate  C^"  bicarbonate  solution. 

The  predominant  blue-green  pigment  is  indeed  resistant  to 
solubilization  but  is  dissolved  in  acetone-water  and  completely 
extracted  by  ethylenediamine.  Solutions,  hke  the  living  stentors, 
are  dichromatic  and  appear  green  by  transmitted  and  red  by 
reflected  light,  but  this  is  no  proof  of  fluorescence.  However, 
Moller  discovered  that  some  races  of  coeruleus  have  an  additional, 
ethanol-extractable  pigment  in  the  cortical  granules  which  renders 
them  red  fluorescent  in  ultraviolet  light  of  wave  lengths  from  366 
to  590  m/x.  Because  the  fluorescence  appears  only  after  these 
stentors  are  dead  or  dying  —  as  when  dried  on  filter  paper  or 
killed  with  boiling  water  —  he  inferred  that  the  pigment  is 
probably  bound  to  some  protein  (or  carbohydrate)  carrier  which 
uniquely  quenches  the  fluorescence  in  living  animals.  The  produc- 
tion of  this  fluorescence  is  a  nuclear-dependent  character  (see 
p.  322).  Moller  and  A.  H.  Whiteley  (unpublished)  found  the 
alcohol-extracted  pigment  or  aqueous  homogenates  only  of 
fluorescent  stentors  to  be  photolethal  (killing  action  of  pigment 
plus  strong  light)  to  Paramecium  caudatum,  Colpidium,  and  to  the 
stentors  themselves  but  not  to  non-fluorescent  coeruleus.  Yet 
living  fluorescent  stentors  seemed  to  affect  non-fluorescent 
animals,  but  not  the  reverse,  in  the  same  medium  (separated  by 
a  screen)  causing  the  latter  to  become  colorless,  smaller  in  size, 
and  even  fluorescent. 

Both  the  fluorescent  and  the  major  pigment  not  extractable  by 
ethanol  are  in  their  spectrometric  and  chemical  properties  different 
from   yet   quite   similar   to   hypericin,    a   photolethal   substance 


FINE    STRUCTURE  49 

previously  found  only  in  certain  plants,  which  is  phototoxic  to 
herbivores.  These  tests  by  Moller  showed  that  the  pigments 
which  may  comprise  stentorin  apparently  belong  to  the  mesonaph- 
thodianthrone  group  of  compounds  also  including  the  photo- 
dynamic  pigments  hypericin  and  phagopyrin.  The  function  of 
pigments  in  coeruleus  is  still  unknown.  Like  the  apparently  related 
chromatic  substances  of  niger  they  may  render  these  stentors 
sensitive  to  light.  Alternatively  or  in  addition,  if  the  pigment  in 
igneus  is  the  same  as  that  in  Blepharisma  which  Giese  (1949)  found 
to  be  toxic  to  certain  other  protozoa,  and  if  that  of  at  least  certain 
if  not  all  races  of  coeruleus  and  niger  be  phototoxic  to  some 
predators  as  eaten,  then  stentor  pigments  might  have  some 
protective  value  for  their  bearers. 

(c)  Clear  stripes  and  their  fiber  systems 

In  the  living  animal  the  highly  differentiated  clear  stripes  show 
a  row  of  cilia  on  their  left  margin  and  in  the  center  a  wide,  sub- 
pellicular  band  best  revealed  by  polarized  light  or  phase  micro- 
scopy. This  band  doubtless  represents  the  original  "  Muskelfaser  " 
described  by  Lieberkuhn  in  1857.  Later  students  of  this  minute 
structure  (notably  Schuberg,  1890;  Johnson,  1893;  Nerescheimer, 
1903;  Schroder,  1907;  Dierks,  1926a;  and  Gelei,  1926)  published 
varying  accounts  of  its  precise  nature  which  are  now  rendered 
obsolete  by  recent  studies  with  electron  microscopy.  Earlier 
accounts  agree,  however,  that  these  bands  run  the  length  of  the 
animal,  branch  and  rebranch  in  correspondence  with  the  clear 
stripes,  are  tapered  toward  the  anterior  end  but  much  thickened 
posteriorly,  in  cross-section  appearing  pendent  from  the  pellicle 
adjacent  to  the  ciliary  rows  as  shown  in  Fig.  loc,  being  contractile 
in  function  and  hence  deserving  the  name  myoneme.  The 
possibility  of  fiber  connectives  between  the  basal  granules  of  the 
cilia,  presumably  required  for  their  coordinated  movement  and 
universally  found  in  ciliates  through  subsequent  study  of  silver- 
line  and  infraciliature  systems,  was  completely  neglected. 

After  the  strained  efforts  with  light  microscopy,  the  EM  studies 
come  as  a  revelation,  though  partially  anticipated  by  Gelei  (1926). 
To  date,  we  have  the  reports  of  Faure-Fremiet  and  Rouiller  (1955), 
Randall  (1956),  Faure-Fremiet,  Rouiller  and  Gauchery  (1956)  and 
Randall  and  Jackson  (1958).  Fig.  lOA  attempts  to  combine  in  one 


50  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

diagram  the  accounts  of  these  two  groups  insofar  as  they  concern 
fibers  lying  under  the  clear  stripes. 

It  is  now  seen  that  the  bands  immediately  underlying  the  clear 
stripes  are  of  lamellae,  stacked  edgewise  and  attached  to  each  other 
as  well  as  to  the  pellicle  by  their  outer  margins,  their  inner  edges 
lying  free.  Each  lamella  is  composed  of  a  stack  or  layer  of  very 
fine  fibrils,  regularly  spaced,  adjacent  lamellae  being  connected  by 
even  finer  processes. 

According  to  the  French  workers  the  main  body  of  this 
lamellation,  which  we  shall  refer  to  empirically  as  the  ribbon 
bundle,  constitutes  the  "ectomyoneme",  a  contractile  organ  of 
unique  structure.  Number  of  lamellae  varies  with  the  level  of  the 
body.  The  ribbon  nearest  the  ciliary  row,  somewhat  different  in 
shape  and  often  separated  from  the  other  lamellae,  was  identified 
as  the  kinetodesma  which  they  supposed  to  connect  the  kine- 
tosomes  or  basal  bodies  of  the  cilia,  and  the  whole  was  referred  to 
as  the  myocihary  complex.  This  connection  was  demonstrated 
by  the  British  workers  whose  photographs  indicate  that  all 
lamellae  in  the  pile  achieve  connection  with  cilia.  They  therefore 
called  the  ribbon  bundle  the  ''  km  band  ",  suggesting  that  all  parts 
are  possibly  involved  both  in  ciliary  coordination  and  in  contrac- 
tion. Fibers  leave  the  bundle  and  bifurcate  as  they  attach  to 
opposite  sides  of  a  kinetosome,  corresponding  to  the  peduncles 
observed  by  Villeneuve-Brachon  (1940)  in  light  microscopy.  It 
was  further  suggested  that  a  given  fiber  may  terminate  forward  on 
one  kinetosome  and  posteriorly  on  another,  presumably  facilitating 
coordination  of  ciliary  beating. 

Either  the  restricted  kinetodesma  of  Faure-Fremiet  et  ah  or 
the  entire  km  band  of  Randall  and  Jackson  follows  the  rule  of 
desmodexy  (Chatton  and  Lwoff,  1935b)  in  that  the  fibrous  con- 
nectives between  the  kinetosomes  lie  to  their  right ;  but  otherwise 
the  system  is  entirely  different  from  the  infraciliature  of  other 
ciHates,  with  the  exception  of  Spirostomum  (Randall,  1956).  In 
other  forms  the  interciliary  fiber  or  kinetodesma  appears  simple 
and  single,  and  transverse  connectives  between  the  kinetodesmata 
are  often  found.  According  to  the  pioneer  work  of  Worley  (1933, 
1934)  on  coordination  of  body  cilia  in  Stentor  and  two  other 
ciliates,  stentors  do  have  these  connectives  and  a  metachronal 
wave  down  a  line  of  cilia  can  escape  around  a  small  surface 


FINE    STRUCTURE 


51 


Older  nuclear  membrane 
inner  nuclear  membrane, 
granular  nuclear  malrix 


Connectives  helween 

M  jbaiids 

macronuclear 
node 
/cinetodestna 


Fig.  10.    Fine  structure  in  Stentor. 

A.  Stereo-diagram  showing  structure  revealed  by  electron- 
microscopy.    (After  Faure-Fremiet  et  al.,   1956  and  Randall, 

Jackson,  195B.) 

B.  Drawing    of    stentor    beginning    to    re-extend,    showing 
convolutions  in  the  fibers  of  the  clear  stripes.    (After  Johnson, 

1893.) 

C.  Section  through  ectoplasm  showing  parts  distinguished  by 

early  microscopists.    (After  Schroder,  1907.) 


52  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

incision  because  of  them.  Klein  (1932)  may  have  demonstrated 
such  transverse  fibers  in  his  silver  staining  of  a  cortical  network 
in  S.  tgneus;  but  the  EM  studies  of  other  species  have  revealed 
no  specialized  connections  between  adjacent  rows.  Another  impor- 
tant difference  is  that  the  system  in  Stentor  is  refractive  to  silver- 
staining  and  neither  the  wet  (Villeneuve-Brachon,  1940)  nor  the 
dry  (Weisz,  1949a)  method  gives  the  beautiful  network  demon- 
strable by  this  means  in  most  other  ciliates. 

If  the  ribbon  bundles  we  are  now  discussing  were  indeed  what 
earlier  workers  described  as  the  myonemes,  as  appears  from 
correspondence  in  location,  certain  of  their  remarks  may  still  be 
pertinent.  Popoff  (1909)  stated  that  the  bands  were  not  only  more 
numerous  but  correspondingly  wider  in  larger  stentors,  57  of 
which  were  studied  in  this  connection.  Anteriorly,  Schroder  (1907) 
found  fine  extensions  of  their  much-tapered  ends  leaving  the 
cortex  and  passing  inward  and  forward  to  attach  to  the  outer 
margin  of  the  membranellar  band.  Dierks  (1926a)  seems  to  have 
seen  something  like  this  too.  Johnson  (1893)  noted  that  the  bands 
are  straight  during  contraction  but  much  convoluted  at  the 
moment  of  beginning  extension  before  the  lengthening  of  the  cell 
has  again  stretched  them  straight  (Fig.  iob).  This  observation 
was  confirmed  by  Faure-Fremiet  et  al.  as  the  behavior  of  the 
ribbon  band.  Gelei  (1926)  reported  that  the  bands  in  the  clear 
stripes  of  the  frontal  field  are  not  tapering  but  of  uniform  thick- 
ness. In  the  expanded  field  he  found  the  bands  to  be  still  slightly 
sinuous  and  in  the  contracted  field  they  were  strongly  coiled.  In 
this  area  the  bands  therefore  did  not  seem  to  become  straight 
when  contraction  occurs,  yet  he  still  regarded  their  function  else- 
where as  contractile. 

A  nice  point  was  made  by  Gelei  when  he  remarked  that  if  the 
fibers  responsible  for  sharp  contraction  were  fastened  only  at  their 
anterior  and  posterior  ends  they  would,  on  developing  a  tension, 
pull  to  the  center  of  the  cell  and  not  form  an  arc  following  the 
contour  of  the  surface  as  is  in  fact  observed.  Contraction  would 
then  draw  the  cell  into  the  shape  of  a  much-flattened  sphere. 
(Incidentally  this  very  shape,  with  corresponding  retraction  of 
the  frontal  disc,  actually  occurs  in  introversus,  in  which  the 
disposition  of  the  contractile  fibers  may  therefore  be  quite  diflFerent 
from  that  in  all  other  known  species  of  Stentor.)  Therefore  Gelei 


FINE    STRUCTURE  53 

postulated  that  the  contractile  bands  were  attached  at  successive 
points  to  the  "  epimuscular  band  ",  by  which  I  think  he  meant  the 
pelHcular  clear  stripe.  The  ectomyonemes  or  km  bands  fulfill  this 
requirement  in  their  connection  with  the  pelHcle.  And  this  con- 
nection not  only  allows  the  bands  to  draw  the  whole  cell  into  a 
compact  sphere  rather  than  merely  pulling  the  head  and  foot 
together,  but  also  makes  possible  the  continued  contraction  of 
isolated  fragments  because  the  bands  need  no  end  anchors.  It 
might  even  make  possible  the  independent  contraction  of  different 
sections  of  the  band,  thus  accounting  for  Dierks  observation  that 
in  simple  contraction  the  anterior  part  of  the  band  shortens  while 
the  posterior  part  remains  unthickened  and  thrown  into  curves, 
itself  straightening  and  thickening  if  super-contraction  follows. 
If  indeed  contractile,  the  ribbon  bundles  as  muscles  should  have 
their  antagonists  (Ishikawa,  1912),  which  would  be  whatever  is 
responsible  for  drawing  out  the  cell.  Elasticity  of  the  pellicle  may 
be  one  factor  here  and  the  accessory  bands  shortly  to  be  mentioned 
another,  but  this  matter  is  quite  uncertain. 

Lying  interior  to  the  ribbon  bundles,  Faure-Fremiet  et  al.  made 
out  a  layer  of  trabecular  cytoplasm  which  in  the  study  of  Randall 
and  Jackson  seemed  to  be  another  set  of  bands  under  the  clear 
stripes,  tapered  forward,  wider  posteriorly,  and  having  transverse 
connectives  (Fig.  iga).  In  their  composition,  these  bands  and 
their  connectives  showed  only  short  fibrils  more  or  less  randomly 
arranged  but  tending  to  align  with  the  axis  and  not  orderly 
stacking  of  long  fibers.  This  is  the  type  of  structure  Faure-Fremiet 
and  his  associates  find  in  the  '^endomyonemes"  of  stalked  ciliates 
like  Vorticella.  Therefore  these  bands  may  be  contractile.  Accor- 
dingly, Randall  and  Jackson  referred  to  them  as  "M  bands". 
The  transverse  connections  may  be  what  Prowazek  (19 13)  observed 
in  vivo:  delicate  transverse  connections  between  the  substance  of 
the  clear  stripes  in  the  expanded  ectoplasm  of  stentors  ''exploding" 
or  deliquescing  on  the  surface  film.  Randall  and  Jackson  found 
that  these  transverse  connections  between  the  M  bands  w^ere 
prominent  posteriorly  but  fewer  at  the  forward  end  of  the  animal. 
Their  demonstration  that  the  matrix  of  the  bands  is  continuous 
with  that  of  the  connectives  would  seem  to  imply  that  action  of  the 
latter  could  not  be  independent,  say,  in  causing  extension  of  the 
animal. 


54  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

Extension  of  stentors  to  over  six  times  their  length  when 
maximally  contracted  calls  for  an  adequate  explanation  but  is  still 
a  mystery.  Randall  and  Jackson's  report  states  that  the  volume  is 
quadrupled  on  extension  but  I  think  they  must  have  meant  the 
surface  area. 

Walls  of  the  M  bands  as  described  by  the  British  v^orkers  are 
surprisingly  indefinite,  becoming  confluent  v^ith  endoplasmic 
vesicles  so  that  the  bands  are  very  intimately  related  to  the  endo- 
plasm,  and  this  could  account  for  the  trabecular  appearance 
observed  by  the  French  investigators.  These  bands  seemed  to 
have  no  connection  with  the  pellicle,  which  of  course  poses  the 
problem  of  how  they  could  produce  the  movement  of  anything 
but  themselves.  One  also  wonders  why  stentors  should  have  two 
parallel  contractile  bands  when  one  would  seem  to  be  sufficient. 
These  and  other  problems  of  structure  and  function  we  hope  will 
be  resolved  by  further  studies  in  this  actively  developing  field. 
Apropos  of  this,  Causin's  (1931)  surprising  statement  may  be 
repeated :  that  although  a  cut  into  the  side  of  a  stentor  is  followed 
by  prompt  healing  and  does  not  initiate  the  formation  of  a  regenera- 
tion primordium,  there  results  nevertheless  a  cryptic  resorption 
and  replacement  of  the  myonemes.  This  observation  should 
certainly  be  checked. 

In  addition  to  understanding  the  static  structure  and  short-time 
activities  of  the  cortex,  we  need  to  learn  how  its  elements  grow  and 
dediflFerentiate,  develop  and  increase  in  number,  as  well  as  how 
they  manage  surprising  performances  in  mending  and  realignment 
after  cutting  and  other  gross  disturbances.  These  capabilities  seem 
contradictory  to  the  fineness  and  complexity  of  the  structures 
present  and  tax  the  imagination  to  conceive  how  they  are  possible. 

(d)  Fiber  systems  of  doubtful  status 

Still  other  types  of  fibers  have  been  reported  in  the  clear  stripes. 
They  were  located  adjacent  to  the  myonemes  and  described  as 
unvarying  in  thickness  and  convoluted  in  the  contracted  animal, 
therefore  presumably  nervous  in  function  and  not  contractile. 
We  have  to  call  them  doubtful  because  these  reports  did  not 
present  at  the  same  time  a  clear  description  or,  indeed,  indicate 
any  awareness  of  possible  kinetodesmata.  Neresheimer  (1903) 
seems  to  have  had  a  bias  for  completing  the  roster  of  '* tissues" 


FINE    STRUCTURE  55 

in  Stentor  by  identifying  nerve  structures.  Following  him  closely 
and  yet  insisting  on  the  uniqueness  of  what  he  had  found,  Dierks 
(1926a)  also  sought  a  nervous  system  because  he  thought  that  the 
coordinated  behavior  of  Stentor  implied  its  existence. 

Neresheimer  called  his  fibers  "neurophanes"  to  contrast  them 
with  *'  myophanes  ",  the  term  used  by  Haeckel  for  the  myonemes. 
In  retrospect  Neresheimer  seems  to  have  stained  and  been 
examining  the  ribbon  bundles,  which  may  indeed  have  a  nervous 
function  if  they  serve  to  coordinate  the  body  cilia.  But  in  whole 
mounts  he  could  follow  these  bands  only  from  the  posterior  end 
to  the  middle  of  the  cell.  Along  this  course  the  fibers  branched  and 
some  of  them  ended  in  minute  bulbs  or  boutons  which  he  regarded 
as  sensory  but  which  Dierks  and  Gelei  (1926)  thought  to  be  mere 
optical  artifacts.  Most  of  the  study  was  on  pieces  of  ectoplasm 
loosed  from  the  animal  by  treatment  with  methylene  blue,  and 
Schroder  (1907)  criticized  the  results  as  artifacts  from  injury  and 
distortion.  In  reply,  Neresheimer  (1907)  admitted  that  he  could 
not  find  his  neurophanes  in  all  preparations  but  insisted  that  they 
were  evident  in  some.  Apparently  he  saw  something  of  the  ribbon 
bundles  but  could  not  divine  their  intimate  structure  and  actual 
extent.  To  demonstrate  that  his  fibers  were  nervous  in  function 
he  treated  stentors  with  drugs  which  act  as  nervous  excitants  and 
depressants  in  metazoa  and  found  they  had  a  similar  effect  on 
stentors  but  not  on  other  ciliates  in  which  "neurophanes"  are 
lacking. 

The  fibers  described  by  Dierks  were  called  "neuroids".  He 
pictured  them  as  running  close  to  but  above  the  myonemes 
(ribbon  bundles)  and  present  throughout  their  entire  extent, 
either  ending  in  these  bands  or  sending  side  branches  to  them. 
The  "  neuroids  "  may  very  well  have  been  kinetodesmata  or  strips 
torn  loose  from  the  ribbon  bundles,  as  Villeneuve-Brachon  sug- 
gested. In  any  event,  nothing  like  them  has  so  far  been  found  with 
the  superior  resolution  of  the  electron  microscope. 

Although  Dierks  (1926a)  himself  questioned  why  stentors 
should  need  ''nerves"  when  the  myonemes  are  so  intimately  in 
contact  with  other  parts  of  the  cell,  he  nevertheless  considered  the 
"neuroids"  nervous  in  function.  This  assumption  was  based  on 
the  response  of  stentors  to  the  potassium  ion  which  causes  them  to 
relax  in  the  extended  state  as  if  the  "neuroids"  were  anaesthetized; 


56  THE  BIOLOGY  OF  STENTOR 

but  on  fixing  the  animals  always  contracted,  as  if  the  myonemes 
were  then  being  stimulated  directly  by  the  fixing  agent. 

Simultaneously,  Gelei  (1926)  found  the  ribbon  bundle  exterior 
to  the  *'endomyonemes"  and  described  it  quite  accurately  within 
the  limits  of  light  microscopy.  Identical  in  location  to  the  so-called 
neurophane  or  neuroid,  he  regarded  this  fibrous  band  as  giving 
support  and  attachment  to  the  myonemes,  therefore  ''skeletal" 
in  function. 

(e)  The  cilia 

Cilia  comprising  the  oral  membranelles  are  evidently  not  only 
longer  but  also  of  larger  diameter  than  the  body  ciha,  according 
to  Randall  and  Jackson.  They  found  that  the  body  cilia  oi  poly- 
morphus  measured  20  /x  in  length,  while  in  light  microscopy  they 
appear  to  be  10 /x  (Andrews,  1945,  found  them  to  be  13  /x  in  coeruleus). 
This  discrepancy  may  be  due  in  large  part  to  the  fact  that  the  cilia 
have  very  fine  tips,  not  easily  visible.  Thus,  in  a  pioneer  work  of 
Schuberg  (1905)  on  coeruleus  cilia  stained  by  the  Golgi  method  it 
was  shown  that  the  proximal  two-thirds  of  the  cilium  stains  darker 
and  is  of  uniform  diameter,  the  distal  third  being  much  narrower 
and  pointed  at  the  end.  Because  the  freed  ciha  were  curved,  he 
foretold  the  view  now  generally  held,  that  the  contraction  of  the 
cilium  is  intrinsic.  He  also  noted  that  fixation  seems  to  preserve 
the  cilia  in  phases  of  their  rhythmic  beating,  thus  anticipating  the 
interesting  work  of  Parducz  (1953).  This  general  picture  was  con- 
firmed with  the  electron  microscope  by  Randall  and  Jackson  whose 
figures  also  show  that  the  fine  tip  is  prolonged  into  the  length  of 
the  wider  portion  as  its  axis. 

Randall  and  Jackson  unmistakably  show  that  at  the  posterior  end 
of  the  cell  the  body  cilia  are  paired  and  no  longer  form  a  single 
row,  raising  the  question  of  how  in  division  the  proter,  acquiring 
a  new  posterior  end  out  of  the  middle  parts  of  the  cell,  could 
develop  a  double  row.  Possibly  there  is  new  growth  there,  as 
Johnson  first  suggested. 

Electron  microscopy  reveals  in  stentors  the  universal  fine  struc- 
ture of  the  cilium.  The  outer  layer  is  continuous  with  the  pellicle 
and  the  axis  shows  the  typical  9  +  2  fibers  (Faure-Fremiet  and 
Rouiller,  1955;  Randall  and  Jackson,  1958).  A  characteristic 
septum  or  basal  plaque  was  found  at  the  level  of  the  cell  surface 


FINE    STRUCTURE  57 

where  the  two  central  fibers  end,  and  there  also  is  to  be  seen  a 
"  kinetosome  "  or  ampule  terminating  the  central  fibers.  According 
to  the  latter  report,  the  base  of  the  cilium,  with  its  prolongation 
of  the  peripheral  fibers,  continues  inward  as  a  cylinder  without 
rootlets  extending  into  the  endoplasm  but  sometimes  showing 
minute  granules  in  longitudinal  rows  along  its  cylindrical  wall.* 

6.  Fine  structure  of  the  nuclei 

Light  microscopists  describe  the  matrix  of  the  macronucleus  as 
of  homogeneous  granules  in  a  sort  of  meshwork  with  one  clear 
spherule,  the  nucleolus,  usually  found  in  each  node  of  a  chain 
nucleus.  The  nuclear  membrane  swxUs  loose  in  distilled  water 
as  a  highly  birefringent  and  therefore  well-organized  layer; 
significantly  Hke  the  shell  of  the  pigment  granules,  its  composition 
was  indicated  to  be  phospholipid  (Weisz,  1949a).  Resting  on  the 
macronuclear  membrane.  Park  (1929)  described  osmiophihc, 
bleb-Hke  bodies,  i  to  22  for  each  node.  He  suggested  that  they 
might  be  secretory  droplets,  reminiscent  of  the  parabasal  body 
associated  with  the  nucleus  in  flagellates. 

Electronmicrographs  reveal  further  details  (Faure-Fremiet  and 
Rouiller,  1955;  Randall  and  Jackson,  1958).  The  granules  within 
the  macronucleus  turn  out  to  be  clusters  of  filaments,  possibly 
beaded,  these  masses  being  more  or  less  equidistantly  spaced 
within  a  clear  nuclear  sap.  The  outer  layer  of  the  macronucleus 
is  porous,  showing  curious  tubular  processes  extending  and 
branching  into  the  endoplasm,  w^hile  the  inner  membrane  appears 
to  be  a  system  of  tubular  vesicles  joined  by  sheets,  resembling 
spaghetti  laminated  in  plastic. 

In  his  cytochemical  studies,  Weisz  (1949a,  1950b)  made 
Feulgen  and  Millon  tests  which  indicate  that  protein  and  nucleo- 
tide or  potential  nucleotides  are  homogeneous  in  concentration  in 
the  macronucleus  at  all  times,  except  of  course  during  conjugation 
when  the  old  macronucleus  is  resorbed.  His  methyl  green  tests 
suggested  however  that  the  nucleotide. — desoxyribonucleic  acid — 

*From  observations  on  stentor  membranelles,  Sleigh  (i960)  ingeniously 
integrated  motor  and  recovery  strokes  of  cilia  as  resulting  from  one  wave 
of  localized  contractions  passing  up  and  around  the  cilium,  the  propulsive 
phase  occurring  when  bending  starts  on  one  side  at  the  base  and  the  rest 
of  the  cilium  is  straight. 


t^8  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

varies  in  degree  of  polymerization  along  the  nuclear  chain.  Faure- 
Fremiet  and  Rouiller  speak  of  this  DNA  as  in  the  form  of  micro- 
somes. In  dark-field  illumination  I  have  found  that  the  exposed 
macronuclear  nodes  are  often  a  glow^ing  light  blue,  which  may 
indicate  something  of  their  composition  or  state  as  aifecting  the 
scattering  of  light. 

The  micronuclei  of  stentors  were  first  described  by  Maupas 
(1879)  and  later  by  Johnson  (1893).  These  very  small  nuclei 
reside  on  or  near  the  macronuclear  chain.  Multiplying  mitotically, 
they  are  typically  chromosomal,  as  further  substantiated  by  their 
behavior  during  conjugation  (see  p.  329). 

7.  The  endoplasm 

The  interior  cytoplasm  w^as  examined  by  Weisz  (1949a)  who 
found  that  it  did  not  stain  with  basic  dyes  and  only  diffusely  with 
acidic.  Neutral  red  was  taken  up  by  the  living  coeruleus  and  stained 
various  inclusions  so  that  stentor  may  be  said  to  have  a  'Vacuome" ; 
this  dye  was  segregated  by  the  contractile  vacuole.  Chromidial 
nets  and  metachromatic  volutin  granules  were  not  present. 

By  introducing  minute  electrodes  into  the  cell,  Gelfan  (1927) 
went  to  much  trouble  to  prove  that  the  electrolyte  concentration 
in  Stentor  is  higher  than  that  in  the  surrounding  fresh  water  medium, 
a  conclusion  which  could  have  been  inferred  from  the  pulsation 
of  the  contractile  vacuole  in  voiding  water  imbibed  through 
osmosis.  The  specific  conductance  was  lower  in  stentors  than 
in  three  other  ciliates  tested.  Internal  conductivity  decreased  with 
injury,  presumably  due  to  the  leakage  of  electrolytes  from  the  cell. 

The  endoplasm  of  stentors  presents  a  foamy  appearance  which 
was  first  emphasized  by  Butschli  in  keeping  with  his  theory  of  the 
alveolar  nature  of  protoplasm.  Correspondingly,  Randall  and 
Jackson  found  by  electron  microscopy  that  the  endoplasm  con- 
sists of  numerous  vacuoles  within  a  matrix  which  shows  many 
small  particles  and  vesicles.  An  endoplasmic  reticulum  was  not 
revealed.  The  vacuoles  have  a  definite  membrane  and  seem  to  be 
especially  numerous  in  the  sub-cortical  regions.  Within  the  endo- 
plasm are  also  found  typical  protozoan  mitochondria.  Randall  and 
Jackson  (1958)  found  them  to  be  Janus  green  B  positive  and 
having  triple  membranes  of  equal  width,  if  one  counts  the  material 
between  outer  and  inner  layers  as  the  third.  The  enclosed  tubular 


FINE    STRUCTURE  59 

vesicles  terminate  on  the  inner  membrane.  Both  membrane  and 
vesicle  w^alls  showed  small  opaque  particles  and  the  interstices 
gave  the  appearance  of  a  finely  particulate  matrix.  Empty  mito- 
chondria were  found,  as  well  as  others  without  bounding  mem- 
branes amongst  the  normal  forms  of  these  bodies,  reminding  one 
of  Weisz's  (1949a)  suggestion  that  the  mitochondria  are  utilized 
in  starvation  and  regeneration. 

Food  reserves  are  also  present  in  the  form  of  fat  droplets  and 
glycogenoid  granules.  In  addition,  multiformis  and  introversus  have 
yellow,  brightly  refringent  bodies  or  crystals  in  the  endoplasm, 
the  nature  of  which  has  not  yet  been  determined. 

Altogether,  this  detail  of  fine  structure  represents  about  as 
extensive  and  intensive  a  cytodifferentiation  as  we  are  likely  to 
find,  comparing  favorably  with  that  of  the  most  complex  hypermas- 
tigont  flagellates  in  arthropods  and  ruminant  commensal  ciliates. 
The  number  of  definable  parts  which  have  been  "compacted** 
into  the  minute  volume  of  a  stentor  is  quite  amazing  and  attests  the 
extremely  fine-grain  structure  possible  to  organisms.  For  instance, 
there  are  about  32,500  fibers  in  the  complement  of  ribbon  bundles 
or  ^m-bands  alone,  not  to  mention  the  countless  cortical  granules, 
etc.  Not  only  in  number  but  in  their  greater  diversity  the  minute 
parts  of  an  organism  like  Stentor  stand  in  contrast  to  the  cyto- 
differentiation of  most  tissue  cells.  This  difference  in  manifest 
complexity  is  one  of  the  reasons  why  some  biologists  have  hesitated 
if  not  refused  to  call  protozoa  cells  or  unicellular  forms.  Yet  a 
stentor  represents  no  more  or  less  a  separate  nucleocytoplasmic 
system  than  a  neurone.  And  a  bridge  between  protozoan  and  tissue 
cell  may  perhaps  be  found  in  the  egg;  for  if  one  refuses  to  call  a 
fertilized  egg  a  cell,  all  seem  to  agree  that  its  cleavage  products  are 
cells  and  from  either  of  the  first  two  cells,  let  us  say,  the  whole 
complex  multicellular  organism  can  be  derived  by  embryogenesis. 
It  may  therefore  not  be  too  much  to  infer  that  such  a  cell  is 
intrinsically  as  complex  as  Stentor,  if  not  more  so,  but  manifesting 
this  complexity  in  development  through  multicellularity  instead  of 
more  directly  in  itself. 

What,  then,  shall  we  *'do"  with  all  the  complex  cytodifferentia- 
tion we  find  in  Stentor  ?  One  approach  is  to  study,  if  possible, 
certain  types  of  parts  in  themselves.  For  example,  the  ^m-bands 


6o  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

may  represent  a  unique  contractile  structure  the  elucidation  of 
which  might  define  a  specific  parameter  of  muscle  physiology. 
This  is  the  orientation  of  Randall  and  his  co-workers.  Or  by 
emphasizing  diflFerences  in  the  parts  of  descendant  individuals  one 
might  explore  new  aspects  of  genetics  such  as  the  importance  of 
cytoplasmic  inheritance,  as  in  the  work  of  Sonneborn ;  and  poten- 
tially this  approach  could  be  most  fruitful  in  Stentor  in  which 
micrurgical  exchange  of  cytoplasms  and  nuclei  is  not  difficult. 

One  may  also  consider  all  the  fine  structure  from  the  standpoint 
of  epigenetics  or  morphogenesis.  Obviously  the  criterion  of  re- 
generation and  other  types  of  epigenetic  performance,  is  the  fine 
structure  also  what  "does"  the  morphogenesis?  Is  the  fine  struc- 
ture the  cause  or  the  result  of  morphogenesis?  For  instance,  in  the 
simple  healing  of  an  incision  in  Stentor  the  ribbon  bundles  and 
their  many  fibers  in  the  clear  stripes  apparently  rejoin;  therefore  in 
addition  to  their  function  of  conduction  and  contraction  have  these 
fibers  also  the  capacity  for  guiding  their  reintegration?  In  some 
way  of  which  we  have  yet  no  understanding  all  the  fine  structure  is 
integrated,  an  obvious  inference  from  the  integrity  of  the  organism 
and  its  normative  tendencies  which  will  receive  specific  documenta- 
tion as  we  proceed  into  the  experimental  studies.  It  is  as  if,  in 
addition  to  its  specific  physiological  functions,  every  meridional 
unit  of  a  stentor  "  knows  "  when  one  of  the  mouthparts  is  missing 
or  the  oral  structures  are  misplaced,  for  all  seem  to  cooperate  in 
correcting  the  deviation  from  the  norm,  some  parts,  often  quite 
distant  from  each  other  yet  somehow  in  effective  communication, 
taking  the  leading  roles. 

For  example,  if  the  head  is  rotated  i8o°  on  the  body,  the 
mouthparts  disconnect  from  the  membranellar  band,  migrate  into 
the  frontal  field  and  are  resorbed — ^this  specific  disjunction  and 
taking  down  of  structures  being  in  its  way  a  compounding  of  the 
marvel  of  their  original  construction.  Then,  in  a  far  distant  part 
of  the  cell  a  new  oral  primordium  begins  on  some  signal,  and 
experiment  indicates  that  all  parts  of  the  cortex  support  anlage 
formation  and  are  involved  in  the  timing  of  its  development. 

But  this  is  to  anticipate  a  part  of  our  story,  yet  such  phenomena 
pose  the  further  problem  of  the  integration  of  all  the  parts  of 
Stentor  in  terms  of  the  fine  structure  w^e  have  described  if  not 
some  further  principle. 


CHAPTER    V 

GROWTH   AND    DIVISION 

I.  Growth 

Division  in  Stentor  is  of  course  usually  preceded  by  growth  to 
the  definitive  size.  Authentic  structural  growth  and  de-growth 
occur,  as  well  as  stretching  of  parts.  The  first  is  seen,  for  example, 
as  increase  in  the  number  of  lateral  clear  stripes  with  their  fibrous 
elaborations ;  the  second,  in  resorption  of  striping  or  macronuclear 
nodes  under  various  conditions ;  and  the  potentialities  for  stretching 
are  shown  when  small  patches  of  ectoplasm  come  to  cover  the 
surface  (see  Fig.  25A)  or  when  isolated  nodes  change  from  round 
to  spindle  form  (see  Fig.  82A).  We  still  have  no  comprehensive 
understanding  of  growth  in  the  individual  stentor  cell  and  no 
investigator  has  yet  addressed  himself  directly  to  this  problem, 
but  the  pigmented  stentors,  especially,  offer  many  advantages  for 
such  a  study.  In  the  first  place,  most  stentors  contract  into  a 
sphere  and  a  fair  estimate  of  their  volume  can  be  obtained  by 
measuring  one  diameter.  Grafted  pairs  can  be  identified  by  their 
pigmented  stripes,  which  are  often  seen  to  increase  both  in  number 
and  in  length  (Fig.  11  a).  Natural  markers  sometimes  are  found  in 
the  cortex  of  the  cell  and  indicate  growth  by  their  apparent  dis- 
placement (b,c).  Similar  markers  for  following  the  growth  of  the 
ectoplasm  could  be  made  by  small  disturbances  of  the  pigment 
striping,  for  the  smaller  these  disarrangements  are  the  longer  they 
persist  before  correction  (Schwartz,  1935). 

Differential  growth  of  major  cell  constituents  is  to  be  seen  in 
the  recovery  of  endoplasm  in  stentor  "skins"  (see  Fig.  25B),  as 
well  as  in  the  rapid  recovery  of  the  macronuclear  mass  when  all 
but  a  single  node  has  been  removed  from  the  cell  (see  Fig.  86c). 
In  normal  stentor  cultures  I  have  occasionally  found  specimens 
which  were  much  longer  than  usual,  with  half  the  normal  number 
of  lateral  stripes,  as  if  growth  in  length  had  occurred  at  the  expense 
of  growth  in  width.  On  isolation  this  disparity  was  later  corrected. 

61 


62 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


B 


Fig.   1 1 .    Observations  suggesting  ways  of  studying  growth  in 
stentors. 


GROWTH    AND    DIVISION  63 

The  lateral  striping  undoubtedly  increases  in  length,  though 
we  do  not  know  when  or  how  this  occurs.  Johnson  said  that  during 
division  the  striping  at  the  posterior  end  of  the  future  anterior 
daughter  cell  lengthens  as  a  new  tail  pole  is  formed  for  it.  But  we 
do  not  know,  for  instance,  how  new  body  cilia  in  a  growing  longi- 
tudinal row  could  be  interpolated  between  those  already  present, 
or  whether  cilia  are  added  only  at  the  end  of  a  row,  or  increased  in 
number  only  during  fission. 

Increase  in  the  number  of  lateral  stripes  is  much  more  obvious. 
Brauer  (1885)  first  suggested  that  the  shorter  stripes  which  do  not 
run  from  pole  to  pole  are  new  ones  resulting  from  multiplication, 
and  that  pigment  stripes  multiply  by  the  interpolation  of  a  new 
clear  stripe  was  proposed  by  Johnson  (1893).  The  number  of 
granular  and  clear  stripes  increases  with  the  size  of  the  animal. 
Largest  specimens  of  coeruleiis  have  about  100  stripes  of  either  kind. 
Tiny  individuals  from  starving  samples  which  were  about  one- 
sixteenth  the  maximum  cell  volume  had  approximately  66  stripes  of 
either  type.  When  a  cell  divides  transversely,  the  division  products 
have  about  80  stripes  of  each  kind  at  their  circumference  because 
about  20  are  carried  into  the  frontal  field  of  the  opisthe  or  posterior 
daughter  cell.  Presumably,  interfissional  increase  is  from  80  to  100 
as  the  volume  is  doubled.  The  number  of  stripes  thus  increases 
with  the  volume  but  less  rapidly,  some  of  the  surface  increase 
probably  being  accommodated  by  widening  of  the  granular  stripes. 
These  remarks  agree  well  with  earHer  conclusions  of  Popoff  (1909). 


A.  A  case  of  differential  increase  in  length  and  breadth  of  a 
grafted  patch,  a:  Patch  bearing  primordium  grafted  into  back 
of  a  host  from  which  mouthparts  were  then  excised,  b:  Primor- 
dium resorbed  but  length  and  number  of  stripes  of  the  graft  also 

promptly  increased. 
B.  Shift  in  relative  location  of  a  tube  formation,  a:  Grafted 
pair  developed  an  adventitious,  gullet-like  tube,  a:  In  process 
of  reorganization-regeneration  next  day,  with  tube  now  displaced 
far  posteriorly,  possibly  indicative^  of  differential  growth  and 
resorption  in  the  ectoplasm. 

C.  Problems   of  growth  indicated  by  another  marker,     a: 

Grafted  pair  developed  a  tube  which  was  resorbed  {b)  leaving 

patch  of  dense  pigment  granules  at  the  surface,      c:  Specimen 

reorganizing  two  days  later  with  pigment  clot  now  far  to  left  of 

primordium  site. 


64  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

Very  small  species  of  Stentor,  like  multiformis,  are  not  miniatures 
of  the  larger  since  they  contain  fewer  stripes  which  are  therefore 
relatively  much  wider  in  proportion  to  the  cell  volume. 

The  lateral  stripes  tend  toward  a  certain  maximum  number. 
When  stentors  were  cut  in  two  longitudinally,  slender  fragments 
were  produced  which  had  half  the  normal  complement  of  stripes. 
The  aboral  halves  not  bearing  the  mouthparts  were  followed 
because  stripe  increase  in  them  is  more  easily  seen  than  in  oral 
halves  with  their  finer  stripes,  as  Stevens  (1903)  noted.  Stripe 
multiplication  occurred  at  the  line  of  heal  (Tartar,  1956c),  and  in 
5  days  the  specimens  regained  the  normal  width  and  number  of 


Fig.  12.    Increase  in  lateral  striping. 

A.  Non-oral  longitudinal  half  has  less  than  half  the  normal 
number  of  stripes  {a),  h:  New  fine  granular-stripes  appear  as 
regeneration  primordium  forms  at  suture.  Continued  splitting 
of  granular  bands  with  interpolated  clear  stripes  {c)  increases 

stripes  to  the  normal  number  {d). 

B.  Parabiotic  graft  of  two  oral  halves  has  somewhat  more 
than  the  normal  number  of  lateral  stripes  yet  increases  the  com- 
plement to  near  zN,  in  correlation  with  the  double  individuality. 

Stripes  (Fig.  i2a).  When  two  of  the  oral  longitudinal  halves  were 
grafted  together  in  homopolar  parabiosis  producing  artificially  a 
more  than  normal  sum  of  stripes,  stripe  increase  still  occurred 
and  very  wide  doublets  with  about  twice  the  normal  number  of 


GROWTH    AND    DIVISION  65 

Stripes  were  produced  (Fig.  i2b).  From  such  experiments  we  may 
eventually  learn  how  the  number  of  lateral  stripes  and  fibrous 
bands  is  controlled. 

Stripe  multiplication  apparently  can  occur  in  any  meridian  of 
the  cell.  When  it  occurs  on  the  dorsal  side  where  the  pigment 
stripes  are  wide,  the  pigmented  stripes  seem  very  quickly  to  attain 
the  width  normal  for  that  area  after  they  have  been  split  in  two  by 
the  interpolation  of  new  clear  stripes.   Figure    13   thus  shows 


Fig.  13.    Specimen  suggesting  that  splitting  of  granular  stripes 

in  wide-stripe  area  quickly  leads  to  broadening  of  these  stripes 

in  harmony  with  those  adjacent. 

branches  of  the  pigment  stripes  as  wide  as  the  "  stem  ".  This  illus- 
tration also  demonstrates  that  the  splitting  of  the  granular  stripes 
can  occur  in  either  direction.  But  the  greatest  stripe  increase  occurs 
at  a  specific  region  in  the  side  of  the  cell  where  the  mouthparts  are 
located.  This  area  has  become  a  key  to  stentor  morphogenesis. 

Brauer  (1885)  had  early  described  in  coeruleus  that  posterior  to 
the  mouth  there  is  a  ''fiber  which  may  give  up  to  10  secondary 
members  lying  against  each  other".  Essentially  this  triangular  area 
is  a  place  where  about  25  clear  stripes  and  an  equal  number  of 
alternating  pigmented  bands  do  not  run  all  the  way  to  the  posterior 
pole  but  are  bounded  on  each  side  by  stripes  which  do  (see  Fig.  i). 
Since  the  stripes  become  shorter  as  they  approach  the  left  boundary 
stripe  and  because  that  stripe  takes  something  of  a  diagonal  course, 


66  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

the  appearance  is  that  the  left  boundary  stripe  is  branching. 
Schuberg  (1890)  therefore  called  this  area  the  "ramifying  zone", 
evidently  the  area  of  stripe  multiplication  and  also  the  site  of  the 
oral  primordium.  In  the  left  anterior  corner  of  this  triangle  the 
widest  pigment  stripes  begin  splitting  into  narrow  stripes.  As 
the  split  proceeds  posteriorly  the  next  wide  stripe  to  the  left  begins 
splitting,  wdth  the  result  that  a  series  of  stripes  of  ever  increasing 
length  is  formed  to  the  right  and  the  characteristic  ramifying  zone 
is  thus  achieved.  At  least  this  is  the  general  impression,  though 
other  details  doubtless  need  to  be  added.  If  so,  growth  takes  a 
spiral  course,  as  it  were,  with  the  zone  of  increase  gradually  moving 
to  the  animal's  left  as  new  short  stripes  are  added  and  older  stripes 
to  the  right  increase  in  length  until  they  reach  the  posterior  pole. 
Correspondingly,  the  oral  primordium  which  appears  in  this  zone 
would  continually  shift  leftward,  with  the  result  that  new  mouth 
parts  appear  always  somewhat  to  the  left  of  those  preceding.  Such 
spiral  growth  recalls  that  of  the  fruiting  body  in  certain  fungi 
(Delbriick  and  Reichardt,  1956). 

We  have  already  remarked  that  pigment  stripes  are  mere  fill-ins 
and  their  splitting  is  doubtless  due  to  the  emergence  within  them 
of  new  clear  stripes  with  their  ciliary  rows  and  fibrous  structures. 
Each  new  clear  stripe  would  then  not  be  connected  with  others, 
corresponding  to  the  description  of  Villeneuve-Brachon  (1940). 
Later  the  clear  stripes  do  join  together  and  cut  off  the  split 
branches  of  a  pigment  band.  Older  figures  thus  show  fibrous  struc- 
tures of  the  clear  stripes  as  branching  and  re-branching  in  the 
ramifying  zone.  From  what  we  now  know  about  kinetics  and 
myonemes  it  is  evident  that  anastomosis  would  entail  great  struc- 
tural difficulties  and  we  have  to  leave  this  problem  until  appro- 
priate EM  studies  are  available.  Because  the  number  of  stripes 
tends  toward  a  fixed  upper  limit,  the  need  for  stripe  multiplication 
may  therefore  vary,  possibly  being  minimal  in  stentors  that  have 
lived  for  a  long  time  without  dividing.  This  would  account  for  the 
observations  of  Johnson,  and  much  later  of  Dierks,  that  the 
ramifying  zone  is  variable  in  its  aspect,  sometimes  even  un- 
identifiable as  such. 

Multiplication  of  clear  stripes  could  not  occur  by  simple 
splitting  since  this  would  leave  one  branch  with  cilia  and  one 
without.  One  branch  would  have  to  migrate  sub-cortically  and 


GROWTH    AND    DIVISION  67 

then  push  up  through  the  adjacent  pigmented  stripe  somehow. 
Apparently  the  new  clear  stripes  with  all  their  attendant  complex 
differentiations  arise  in  situ,  but  of  their  origin  we  know  nothing. 
If  we  accept  the  genetic  continuity  of  the  kinetosomes  and  regard 
them  as  fibrogenic  granules  which  produce  not  only  the  cilia  but 
also  the  fibrils  of  the  ribbon  bundles  in  the  clear  stripes  (see 
Lwoff,  1950),  the  new  kinetosomes  will  have  to  be  traced  to  their 
progenitors. 

Growth  of  other  parts  of  the  stentor  cell  present  their  own 
special  problems.  The  young  daughter  cell  has  a  membranellar 
band  proportionate  in  length  to  its  size.  When  full-grown  the 
length  has  increased  and  is  still  proportionate.  Morgan  (1901a) 
therefore  thought  that  this  organelle  grows  in  length  and  implied 
that  the  number  of  membranelles  increases.  But  if  this  were  so, 
Stentor  would  need  two  ways  of  producing  membranelles :  through 
primordium  formation  and  in  situ.  If  the  length  of  the  membranellar 
band  is  abbreviated  by  cutting,  compensating  growth  does  not 
occur,  contrary  to  a  dubious  observation  of  Stevens  (1903).  There- 
fore it  seems  more  likely  that  increase  in  length  is  accomplished 
by  the  spreading  apart  of  membranelles,  already  present,  as 
obviously  occurs  during  the  development  of  the  oral  primordium. 
This  point  could  be  settled  by  counting  the  membranelles.  Both 
the  total  mass  and  the  surface  area  of  the  macronucleus  increase, 
together  or  separately.  Growth  of  the  nucleus  will  be  discussed 
in  a  chapter  devoted  to  that  organelle.  For  the  present,  we  may 
merely  remark  that  the  trophic  macronucleus,  perhaps  like  the 
giant  salivary  gland  chromosomes  of  insects,  represents  a  form  of 
nuclear  material  which  adapts  to  the  size  of  the  cell  and  not  vice 
versa  (cf.  Goldschmidt,  1940). 

2.  The  course  of  normal  division 

From  regeneration  studies  we  may  say  that  a  stentor  could 
multiply  by  simply  cutting  itself  in  two,  the  resulting  daughters 
then  regenerating  those  structures  which  they  lack.  This  would 
be  cell  fission  in  the  strict  sense  of  the  term  and  does  occur  under 
unusual  conditions  of  experiment.  A  stentor  might  even  cut  itself 
into  several  fragments  each  of  which  would  be  viable,  for  neither 
the  whole  nor  the  half  represents  a  minimum  unit  of  potential 
organization.  But  in  nature  division  is  accomplished  by  trans- 


68 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Fig.  14.    Stages  in  division  as  seen  in  living  S.  coenileus. 

Stage  o.    First  indication  of  fission:  a  splitting  of  granular 

bands  at  the  bulk-center  of  the  cell  on  the  oral  side.  (Fine  striping 

of  frontal  field  and  ciliary  membranelles  shown  here  but  omitted 

in  remaining  sketches.) 


GROWTH    AND    DIVISION  69 

forming  the  parent  organism  into  two  individualities  the  morpholo- 
gies of  which  come  to  exclude  each  other  and  are  finally  separated 
by  fission.  To  paraphrase  one  of  the  ablest  students  of  Stentor: 
the  situation  in  ciliates  is  the  reverse  of  that  in  metazoa  since  all 

Stage  I .  Initial  appearance  of  oral  primordium  for  the  pos- 
terior daughter  cell,  as  a  transverse  rift  in  the  lateral  ectoplasm. 

Stage  2.  Primordium  enlarges  by  extending  anteriorly  with 
a  new  curvature  to  the  right.  Anlage  has  a  faint  glisten  in 
reflected  light  but  no  cilia  are  apparent  yet. 

Stage  3.  Primordium  increases  in  length  and  membranellar 
cilia  are  visible  but  not  yet  grown  to  their  final  length.  Continued 
multiplication  of  striping  within  curvature  of  the  anlage. 

Stage  4.  Primordium  grown  to  nearly  its  full  length  and  oral 
cilia  are  organized  into  closely-packed  membranelles  which  beat 
in  slow^  metachronal  rhythm.  Moniliform  macronucleus  still 
shows  no  change. 

Stage  5.  An  enlargement  or  etched  space  appears  at  posterior 
end  of  the  primordium,  site  of  the  future  mouthparts.  Anlage 
now  embraces  many  fine  stripes.    Macronuclear  nodes  begin 

fusing. 

Stage  6.  Posterior  end  of  membranellar  band  coils  inward 
sharply  to  form  gullet  and  cytostome.  During  this  stage  severing 
of  stripes  begins  at  each  side  of  anterior  end  of  the  primordium 
and  progresses  on  both  sides  around  the  cell  to  form  the  fission 
furrow.  Macronucleus  fused  to  a  compact  mass.  Fading  or 
partial  dedifferentiation  of  oral  pouch  and  gullet,  begun  at  stage 
5,  is  now  at  its  maximum. 

Stage  7.  Primordium  migrates  posteriorly,  its  anterior  end 
being  cut  out  of  the  anterior  daughter  cell  whose  stripes  heal 
together  at  once  in  a  herringbone  pattern  which  will  for  a  long 
time  distinguish  proter  from  opisthe.  Gullet  and  cytostome  are 
now  nearly  complete  and  fine  striping  enclosed  by  the  anlage  is 
being  carried  forward  as  the  new  frontal  field.  Compact  macro- 
nucleus  elongates  to  rod  shape  and  begins  renodulation  from  the 

ends. 

Stage  8.  Oral  pouch  is  now  formed  as  an  inpocketing  of  the 
frontal  field  adjacent  to  the  cytostome.  Primordium  migrates  to 
its  definitive  position  at  anterior  end  of  opisthe  and  body  striping 
becomes  parallel  to  the  membranellar  band.  Rod-shaped  macro- 
nucleus  is  divided  by  constriction  of  the  furrow  which  has  nearly 
separated  the  daughter  cells  and  formed  the  new  posterior  pole 
of  the  proter.  Mouthparts  of  proter  redefined,  membranellar 
band  probably  proportionately  reduced  from  length  in  original 
cell.    Fission  products  then  twist  apart.    (After  Tartar,  1958c.) 


yo  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

the  "embryology"  occurs  before  instead  of  after  reproduction 
(Johnson,  1893).  (An  exception  is  found  in  budding,  such  as  chain 
formation  in  lower  worms  in  which  new  individualities  are  com- 
pletely formed  before  separation,  an  analogy  with  protozoan 
reproduction  first  suggested  by  Gruber  (1885a).)  A  self-cutting  or 
fission  line  is  indeed  formed  in  StentoTy  but  it  is  neither  the  cause 
nor  the  necessary  result  of  the  conversion  of  one  individuality 
into  two. 

MultipHcation  by  fission  in  Stentor  was  first  observed  by 
Trembley  (1744).  With  continued  refinement  of  the  microscope, 
further  details  of  division  were  given  by  Stein  (1867),  Moxon 
(1869),  and  Cox  (1876);  yet  it  remained  for  Schuberg  (1890)  to 
provide  the  first  really  comprehensive  account  of  what  takes  place. 
Stentor  division  as  a  developmental  process  was  beautifully  and 
accurately  drawn  in  the  illustrations  of  Johnson  (1893)  and 
Schwartz  (1935).  Visible  changes  during  division  have  been 
designated  as  a  numbered  series  of  stages  (Tartar,  1958c)  and  are 
shown  in  Fig.  14. 

Restricting  the  story  to  the  best-known  species,  coeruleus,  the 
first  sign  of  the  formation  of  a  new  individuality  is  a  splitting  of 
the  pigment  stripes  on  a  diagonal  in  the  mid-ventral  region 
(Fig.  14-0),  first  noted  by  Stevens  (1903)  and  very  probably 
representing  the  insertion  of  new  clear  bands.  In  this  area  of 
stripe  multiplication  a  rift  soon  appears  as  the  very  beginnings  of 
the  new  set  of  feeding  organelles  for  the  future  posterior  daughter 
cell.  This  primordium  lengthens  at  both  ends  according  to 
Johnson  and  broadens  quickly  to  its  definitive  width  while  the 
long  oral  cilia  develop  within  it.  At  this  time  the  anlage  is  usually 
in  the  form  of  a  crescent  and  this  appearance  is  generally  diagnostic 
of  an  early  divider.  (Occasionally  the  anterior  end  of  the  primor- 
dium may  extend  straight  forward  towards  the  old  oral  region,  as 
it  does  in  reorganizing  animals,  so  one  cannot  always  be  sure.) 
There  is  increasing  multiplication  of  stripes  as  pigment  bands  at 
the  anterior  border  of  the  primordium  split  into  2,  4,  and  8  rows 
(Fig.  15A)  (Schwartz,  1935).  It  is  these  new,  fine  stripes  embraced 
by  the  presumptive  membranellar  band  which  will  form  the  new 
frontal  field  of  the  opisthe.  Such  additions  may  increase  the 
circumference  of  the  cell  according  to  Stevens  and  Schwartz, 
though  this  is  certainly  not  obvious. 


GROWTH    AND    DIVISION 


71 


A 


Fig.  15.    Details  of  division  in  S.  coerideus. 

A.  Eight,  four  and  two-fold  splitting  of  granular  bands  to 
produce  the  fine  bands  of  the  new  frontal  field  enclosed  by  a 
stage-2    primordium.     The    number    of   interpolated    kinetics 

(clear  stripes)  is  correspondingly  increased. 

B.  Macronuclear  division  according  to  Johnson,  showing 
clumping  of  nodes,  followed  by  rod  formation,  pinching  in  two 
of  the  nucleus  by  the  dividing  cell  and  beginning  renodulation. 
A  preliminary  constriction  of  the  massed  nucleus  (c)  may  go  to 
completion  {d')  with  larger  portion  extending  into  and  contri- 
buting to  the  nucleus  of  the  proter.    (After  Johnson,  1893.) 

C.  Persisting  fission  in  late  divider  after  posterior  excision; 
rod-form  macronucleus  distributes  itself  accordingly  and  is 
unequally  —  but  proportionately  —  divided.    (After  de  Terra, 

I959-) 


72  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

Continuing  its  development,  the  posterior  end  of  the  primordium 
begins  to  coil  inward  to  form  the  gullet  (stage  6).  At  this  time  the 
cell  usually  shows  a  central  contraction  tending  slightly  toward  a 
dumbbell  shape,  but  this  constriction  is  not  coincident  with  the 
future  furrow  (Johnson)  and  makes  its  appearance  earlier,  as  our 
figure  shows. 

A  fission  line  then  appears  at  both  sides  of  the  anterior  end  of 
the  primordium.  To  the  right  it  cuts  off  the  presumptive  frontal- 
field  striping  and  runs  approximately  perpendicular  to  these  stripes 
which  have  been  somewhat  distorted  by  the  movements  of  the 
anlage.  To  the  left,  the  furrow  runs  sharply  posteriorly  while 
cutting  obliquely  across  the  wide  granular  stripes  in  this  area,  the 
two  ends  of  the  fission  line  moving  more  and  more  transversely  as 
they  proceed  around  the  cell  to  meet  on  the  lower  dorsal  side.  By 
being  oblique,  the  furrow  can  cut  the  primordium,  which  runs  far 
anteriorly,  into  the  posterior  cell  and  yet  divide  the  parent  into 
approximately  equal  daughters.  The  fission  line  is  made  evident 
by  a  change  in  the  pigmented  stripes  which  leaves  a  colorless  band 
across  each  one.  Possibly  this  may  be  caused  by  the  formation  of 
new  transverse  contractile  structures,  pushing  the  granules  aside 
and  later  responsible  for  constriction  at  the  furrow. 

Only  when  the  membranellar  band  is  fully  formed  and  the  gullet 
begins  to  develop  (stage  5-6)  does  the  macronucleus  undergo  a 
relatively  rapid  series  of  changes.  At  this  time  the  nodes  of  the 
nucleus  begin  to  coalesce  within  the  common  nuclear  membrane. 
According  to  Johnson,  this  fusion  occurs  at  separate  loci  because 
it  sometimes  may  result  in  a  premature  breaking  of  the  chain. 
Eventually  the  nucleus  is  compacted  into  one  more  or  less  spherical 
mass  in  the  center  of  the  cell,  though  unsuccessful  enucleation 
experiments  performed  at  this  time  indicate  that  occasionally  one 
or  more  nodes  may  remain  isolated.  Johnson  described  the 
clumped  nucleus  as  then  showing  a  preliminary  constriction 
which  lasts  for  about  half  an  hour,  then  disappearing  as  the  nucleus 
elongates  into  a  rod  (Fig.  15B).  But  sometimes  this  constriction 
was  completed,  the  nucleus  then  and  there  separating  into  two 
parts,  not  always  equal.  When  unequal,  the  larger  part  showed  a 
secondary  division  later,  resulting  in  a  more  equal  allocation  of 
the  nuclear  material.  These  observations  of  exceptional  behavior, 
as  well  as  the  fact  that  division  usually  occurs  later  in  the  rod 


GROWTH    AND    DIVISION  73 

Stage,  indicate  that  clumping  is  not  for  the  purpose  of  dividing  the 
nucleus  equally.  Hence  Johnson  suggested  that  both  the  clumping 
and  the  preliminary  constriction  are  a  recapitulation  of  phylogeny, 
harking  back  to  the  form  in  fission  of  the  nucleus  in  less  specialized 
protozoa.  Nor  is  there  any  evidence  of  macronuclear  reorganization 
occurring  during  clumping;  for  Johnson  found  that  the  character 
of  the  macronuclear  matrix  remained  unchanged  and  he  stated 
explicitly  that  there  was  no  indication  of  linear  arrangement  of 
threads  or  the  formation  of  something  like  chromosomes. 

At  the  earliest,  a  new  contractile  vacuole  for  the  opisthe  makes 
its  appearance  in  the  proper  location  at  stage  4.  Its  formation  is 
therefore  probably  not  initiated  by  the  division  furrow,  which  is 
not  yet  visible,  though  Weisz  (1951b)  found  that  cutting  the  stripes 
of  non-dividing  stentors  transversely  would  induce  the  temporary 
formation  of  a  posterior  vacuole  and  I  have  confirmed  this. 

As  the  division  line  cuts  around  its  upper  end,  the  primordium 
can  bend  more  sharply  and  move  backwards  into  the  future 
opisthe.  Schwartz  described  how  the  anlage  shifts  with  reference 
to  the  striping  on  the  left  side  so  that  these  lines,  at  first  parallel, 
come  to  lie  at  right  angles  to  the  new  membranellar  band.  The  cut 
ectoplasm  of  the  future  proter,  or  anterior  daughter,  closes  together 
immediately  as  the  primordium  migrates  posteriorly,  with  the 
result  that  a  herringbone-pattern  of  stripes  is  formed  which  is 
somewhat  asymmetrical  because  the  furrow  ran  more  sharply 
posteriorly  on  the  left  side.  Anterior  can  be  distinguished  from 
posterior  daughters  long  after  separation  because  this  pattern  may 
persist  for  three  days  afterward  in  starved  animals.  Gradually  the 
abbreviated  stripes  grow  posteriorly  to  reproduce  the  typical 
ramifying  zone. 

In  the  meantime  the  anterior  portion  of  the  opisthe  bearing  the 
primordium  has  been  bulging  outward  while  gullet  and  oral  pouch 
have  been  forming  and  shifting  forward.  The  clumped  macro- 
nucleus  then  elongates  parallel  to  the  main  axis  to  form  a  long 
rod,  which  begins  to  nodulate  simultaneously  at  both  ends.  As 
constriction  continues  the  stripes  of  the  proter  are  drawn  together 
to  form  its  tail  and  possibly  extend  in  length  as  they  narrow  to  a 
point.  The  half-nodulated  macronucleus  now  divides  in  two; 
Johnson  thought  that  its  division  is  autonomous  and  the  same  is 
implied  in  Causin's  (1931)  report  that  even  in  regeneration  the 


-74  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

macronucleus  can  divide  within  the  single  cell,  the  separated  parts 
then  rejoining.  Yet  it  has  been  found  (Popoff,  1909;  de  Terra, 
1959)  that  if  cell  division  is  unequal  the  macronucleus  is  likewise, 
quite  as  if  this  nucleus  were  passively  pinched  in  two  at  the  rod 
stage  by  the  constricting  furrow  (Fig.  15c).  The  proter  is  now 
connected  with  the  opisthe  only  by  the  tail  pole,  still  attached  at 
the  aboral  end  of  the  latter's  membranellar  band ;  and  up  to  this 
time  the  daughters  have  continued  to  coordinate  their  backward 
and  forward  swimming  together  (Gruber,  1886).  Final  separation 
seems  to  be  due  to  a  twisting  apart  which  sunders  the  fine  con- 
nection between  the  two  cells. 

According  to  Johnson's  account  the  micronuclei  swell  and 
undergo  mitosis  after  macronuclear  division  is  completed,  i.e., 
within  the  essentially  separate  daughters.  Each  daughter  thus 
achieves  about  the  same  number  of  micronuclei  as  the  parent  cell. 
After  completing  nodulation  there  are  about  the  same  number  of 
macronuclear  beads  in  each  product  as  there  were  in  the  original 
animal.  Therefore  these  nodes  are  half  the  size  of  the  original  ones 
and  nuclear  growth  consists  largely  of  increase  in  the  size  of  the 
new  nodes,  though  occasionally  one  segment  may  later  divide  in 
two.  This  doubUng  of  the  nodes  of  the  macronucleus  was  first 
noted  by  Balbiani  (1882)  and  later  confirmed  by  Johnson;  Stolte; 
and  Tartar  (1959c).  It  is  therefore  plausible  that  the  macronucleus 
clumps  together  to  make  possible  its  renodulation  at  once  into 
twice  the  original  number  of  nodes. 

De  Terra's  (1959)  studies  on  coeruleus  have  shown  that  the 
uptake  and  incorporation  of  radiophosphorus  is  very  rapid  before 
division  but  drops  to  one-twentieth  of  this  rate  when  the  macro- 
nucleus  is  compacted  and  fission  is  in  process,  indicating  that 
nuclear  increase  does  indeed  occur  by  growth  of  the  nodes  and 
not  when  the  nucleus  is  in  the  coalesced  stage  immediately 
preceding  fission. 

The  time  required  to  complete  the  act  of  division  is  probably 
quite  variable  but  about  6  hours  would  be  a  reasonable  average. 
The  first  stages  having  to  do  with  primordium  formation  proceed 
more  slowly.  Fusion  of  the  nodes  of  the  macronucleus  can  occur 
in  one  hour  according  to  Johnson  and  the  nuclei  renodulate  as 
rapidly.  Timing  of  the  complex  events  in  division  presents  special 
problems  in  the  integrated  action  of  the  cell,  and  one  possibility 


GROWTH    AND    DIVISION  75 

is  that  any  specific  event  triggers  the  next  following  (see  p.  295). 
From  the  general  description  of  division  wq  see  hov^  the 
daughter  cells  are  composed  of  parts  both  old  and  new.  Endoplasm 
and  nuclear  material  are  halved,  but  the  macronuclear  beads  are 
reconstituted  and  new  micronuclei  appear  as  division  products  of 
the  old.  The  original  feeding  organelles  go  to  the  proter.  They 
may  undergo  a  slight  dedifferentiation  during  fission,  with  the 
oral  pouch  temporarily  disappearing  as  such,  but  there  is  no 
comprehensive  regression  and  rediff"erentiation  as  in  Bursaria 
(Schmahl,  1926)  or  Condylostoma  (Villeneuve-Brachon,  1940). 
Nevertheless,  the  original  oral  structures  which  are  at  first  too 
large  are  gradually  reduced  to  proportionate  measure  in  some 
manner  which  is  not  yet  understood  (Weisz,  1951b).  The  proter 
also  retains  the  original  contractile  vacuole  but  it  has  to  form  a 
new  tail-pole  and  holdfast.  The  original  tail  goes  to  the  opisthe 
and  is  also  at  first  too  large,  but  the  posterior  daughter  has  a  new 
set  of  oral  structures  formed  entirely  independently  of  the  old. 
It  also  develops  a  new  contractile  vacuole,  though  this  may  be 
but  an  enlargement  of  contributory  channels  of  the  old.  The  striped 
ectoplasm  is  divided  largely  unchanged  between  the  two  daughters, 
although  there  may  be  a  growing  out  of  stripes  and  fibers  in  the 
formation  of  the  new  tail  as  there  is  also  a  post-fissional  stripe 
multiplication  in  the  opisthe  to  form  a  new  ramifying  zone 
(Schwartz,  1935).  There  is,  however,  a  marked  decrease  in  the 
number  of  lateral  stripes  because  those  in  the  ramifying  zone  are 
shifted  to  the  frontal  field.  Presumably  the  old  body  cilia  are 
passed  on  unchanged,  for  there  is  never  a  time  when  ciliation  is 
lacking.  One  should  keep  in  mind,  however,  the  amazing  possibility 
described  by  Schmahl  for  Bursaria  truncatella^  in  which  a  ciliary 
molting  seems  to  occur,  resorption  of  old  cilia  and  formation  of 
new  ones  occurring  simultaneously  and  therefore  easily  overlooked. 

3.  Nature  and  location  of  the  fission  line 

We  still  know  practically  nothing  of  what  happens  at  the  division 
furrow.  It  seems  highly  improbable,  as  Johnson  remarked,  that 
the  line  represents  the  edge  of  a  plane  passing  through  the  interior 
of  the  cell  though  Weisz  (1956)  conceived  that  there  might  be 
some  sort  of  separation  or  pre-division  of  the  endoplasm  which 
later  comes  to  expression  on  the  surface.  There  is  no  obvious 


76  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

rupture  in  the  surface  of  the  cell  as  Schuberg  (1890)  first  thought, 
for  even  with  the  most  drastic  manipulation  of  dividers  no  gaping 
or  separation  occurs  along  the  fission  lines.  Yet  it  is  reasonable  to 
suppose  that  there  is  a  severing  of  the  granular  stripes  and  fibrous 
structures  in  the  clear  stripes,  because  we  know  that  the  striping 
also  has  a  strong  tendency  to  heal  together  when  cut  and  this 
procHvity  would  have  to  be  overcome.  The  severance  is,  however, 
not  necessarily  irreversible.  Popoff  (1909)  described  one  case  and 
I  have  seen  another  in  which  division  was  aborted  and  the  fission 
line  disappeared  without  a  trace,  showing  the  pigment  stripes 
again  running  continuously  from  pole  to  pole. 

All  that  we  can  be  certain  of  at  present  is  that  the  pigment 
granules  are  moved  away  at  the  levels  where  the  colored  stripes 
cross  the  future  furrow.  Something  of  how  this  occurs  may  be 
shown  in  the  aboral  longitudinal  half  of  a  stage-4  divider  which 
still  continued  on  its  course  and  attempted  division.  As  shown  in 
Fig.  I  6a,  the  granules  at  mid-level  in  each  stripe  were  seen  in  one 
place  to  have  shifted  from  the  center  of  the  stripe  posteriorly  and 
this  may  have  been  the  prelude  to  the  complete  depigmentation  of 
the  stripes  in  the  adjacent  region.  This  appearance  resembles  that 
of  stripe  multipUcation,  and  it  is  possible  that  new,  short,  posterior 
kinetics  were  being  introduced  which  pushed  the  pigment  granules 
aside  as  they  formed  double  rows  of  cilia  demonstrated  by  Randall 
and  Jackson  for  the  new  tail  pole.  The  half-cell  did  not  complete 
division,  but  it  did  form  a  secondary  tail-pole,  very  likely  because 
the  body  striping  remained  severed.  This  case  is  also  significant 
in  showing  that  although  the  furrow  normally  begins  at  the 
anterior  end  of  the  oral  primordium  this  is  not  essential  to  furrow 
formation. 

The  fact  that  the  fission  line  does  not  form  all  at  once  but 
progresses  in  two  directions  around  the  cell  suggested  to  Weisz 
(1951b)  that  there  are  two  waves  of  dissolution,  each  beginning  at 
one  point  on  a  given  stripe  and  spreading  radially  until  it  touches 
and  sets  off  a  new  center  of  dissolution  in  the  next  adjacent  intact 
stripe,  like  the  firing  of  a  fuse.  This  would  not  explain,  however, 
why  the  fission  line  moves  sharply  posteriorly  on  one  side  of  the 
primordium;  nor  why,  in  Stevens'  (1903)  observation  of  longitu- 
dinal halves  of  dividing  stentors,  the  furrow  stopped  short  by  two 
pigment  stripes  on  each  side  of  the  line  of  heal;  nor  why  the  line 


GROWTH    AND    DIVISION  77 

Stops  at  ''indifferent"  striping  (Fig.  i6b).  The  latter  blockage  is 
probably  not  because  the  indifferent  component  is  not  in  a  "state 
of  division"  since  Weisz  (1951b)  had  shown  that,  although  removal 
of  patches  of  ectoplasm  in  the  path  of  the  presumptive  furrow  still 


D 


Fig.  16.   Pertaining  to  the  fission  line  (S.  coenileus). 

A.    Continuation  of  furrow  formation  in  the  non-oral  half  of 
divider  cut  longitudinally  at  stage  4.  Note  how  pigment  granules 
withdraw  from  the  middle  of  granular  stripes  and  accumulate 
posteriorly. 


-78  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

permits  normal  fission  as  the  division  line  crosses  the  suture,  if 
other  ectoplasm  from  the  same  dividing  animal  is  shifted  to  fill 
the  gap  the  furrow  then  does  not  cross  over.  Evidently,  as  Weisz 
remarked,  the  path  of  the  fission  line  is  strongly  and  uniquely 
determined  and  cannot  be  initiated  by  local  point-to-point  processes 
alone. 

Fixity  of  the  presumptive  furrow  is  shown  by  the  observation, 
first  reported  by  Johnson,  that  if  the  anterior  or  posterior  end  of  a 
divider  is  cut  off  just  before  the  furrow  is  to  appear,  unequal 
daughters  are  formed  because  the  fission  line  appears  in  its  normal 
place.  If  at  the  same  stage  a  cell  is  prematurely  divided  by  cutting, 
fission  still  occurs  along  the  predetermined  oblique  path  half  of 
which  lies  in  each  fragment  with  the  result  that  small  blebs  are 
separated  (Fig.  i6c).  An  artificial  cutting  of  the  body  stripes  is  thus 
not  used  as  a  substitute  for  the  normal  fission  Une.  Also,  if  pre- 
furrow  dividers  are  cut  through  transversely,  first  on  one  side  and 
then  on  the  other  so  that  the  two  halves  remain  fused  together, 
division  still  occurs  but  it  is  oblique  and  not  in  the  line  of  heal. 
Still  more  convincing  is  the  experiment  in  which  these  cut  halves 
are  rotated  180°  upon  each  other  so  that  the  body  striping  does  not 
match  or  heal  together,  as  evidenced  by  obvious  discontinuities  in 
the  granular  stripes;  for  even  in  this  case  relatively  normal  and 
equal  division  occurs  with  both  parts  of  the  severed  primordium 
going  to  the  opisthe  and  division  was  obviously  not  in  the  line  of 
created  discontinuities  (Fig.  i6d). 

These  cutting  experiments  not  only  attest  the  fixity  of  the  fission 
line,  even  before  it  is  visible  as  such;  they  also  strongly  indicate 
that  division  in  stentor  is  not  due  to  ingrowth  of  separating  mem- 
branes, surface  tension  changes,  or  other  mechanisms  which  have 


B.  Stage-5  divider  grafted  to  a  non-divider.  Fission  continues 
on  the  divider  side  but  furrow  stops  when  it  meets  indifferent 
striping.    Daughter  cells  do  not  separate  because  held  together 

by  the  partner  of  the  graft. 

C.  Stage-4  divider  cut  in  two  continues  fission  along  the  pre- 
determined fission  line  resulting  in  separation  of  small  blebs. 

D.  Stage-4  divider  with  anterior  rotated  on  posterior  half, 
separating  the  primordium  into  2  sections.  Both  parts  of  the 
anlage  still  go  to  the  opisthe.    Fission  line  does  not  follow  the 

discontinuity  of  striping  at  the  suture. 


GROWTH    AND    DIVISION  79 

been  invoked  to  explain  cleavage  in  eggs.  And  the  old  notion  of  a 
constriction  band  which  must  remain  a  complete  ring  in  order  to 
exert  a  pull  is  of  course  precluded.  There  is  no  doubt  that  con- 
striction occurs,  which  is  probably  from  point  to  point  on  the 
furrow.  Localized  contraction  together  with  the  cutting  of  the 
lateral  stripes  and  bands  are  probably  the  two  agents  directly 
involved  in  fission. 

We  now  consider  observations  and  experiments  relating  to  the 
question  of  how  the  division  line  is  determined  so  that  it  should 
be  at  a  certain  level  on  the  cell,  normally  such  as  to  produce 
daughter  cells  of  equal  volume.  This  line  appears  to  be  precisely 
laid  out  as  a  perfectly  smooth  curve  without  indefinite  zig-zagging. 

Suggestively,  there  is  a  cell  constituent  which  comes  to  follow 
this  contour  during  division.  This  is  the  complement  of  glycogenoid 
granules  which  comprises  the  carbohydrate  reserves  of  Stentor. 
Weisz  (1949a)  had  previously  noted  that  these  reserves  are  about 
equally  distributed  between  the  two  daughter  cells  though  initially 
lying  at  the  posterior  end,  and  later  I  supplied  an  exact  account  of 
their  distribution  (Tartar,  1959a).  In  a  well-fed  pre-divisional 
stentor  the  granules  lie  in  a  broad  sub-cortical  band  at  the  posterior 
end,  exclusive  of  the  pole  itself  and  interrupted  or  missing  in  the 
post-oral  meridian  (Fig.  17).  About  stage  5,  considerably  before 
the  first  visible  indication  of  a  furrow,  half  of  the  granules  migrate 
forward.  Those  left  behind  become  somewhat  more  diffuse  than 
they  were  before.  The  anterior  border  of  the  migrated  complement 
is  also  irregular,  but  its  posterior  boundary  forms  a  sharp  line 
precisely  defining  the  path  of  the  fission  fine  which  soon  appears. 
When  furrowing  occurs,  therefore,  it  merely  segregates  the 
reserves  which  were  previously  divided.  These  events  do  occur  at 
just  the  time  when  the  fission  fine  is  being  determined  with  respect 
to  its  location.  But  if  immediately  preceding  this  stage  the  carbo- 
hydrate reserves  are  excised  from  the  cell  by  cutting  off  the 
posterior  end  where  they  still  reside,  division  can  still  occur  in  their 
absence.  Therefore  the  peculiar  behavior  described  is  not  the 
cause  but  rather  seems  to  be  the  sign  of  other  factors  which 
locate  the  fission  line. 

Whatever  it  is  that  determines  the  path  of  the  division  furrow, 
there  is  further  evidence  of  the  pervasive  nature  of  this  agent  from 
unpublished  experiments  in  which  excision  of  parts  far  distant 


8o 


HE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


from  the  circumference  of  the  cell  produce  grossly  unequal 
daughters,  not  accounted  for  by  the  relatively  small  loss  of  cyto- 
plasm. Enlarging  upon  an  experiment  by  Weisz  (1951b),  I  found 
that  if  the  mouthparts  or  the  membranellar  band  or  both  are 
minimally  excised  or  caused  to  be  shed  by  salt  treatments  from 
early  dividers,  proters  are  later  produced  which  are  only  about 
half  the  volume  of  the  opisthes  (Fig.  i8a).  That  this  difference  is 
too  great  to  be  due  to  the  ablations  alone  is  obvious,  and  confirmed 


Fig.  17.    Predivision  of  carbohydrate  reserves  (S.  coeruleus). 

A.  Normal  distribution  of  glycogenoid  granules  in  a 
subcortical  band  at  the  posterior  end,  open  in  the  primordium 

meridian. 

B.  Separation  of  granules  into  two  groups  at  stage  5,  the 
posterior  border  of  the  anterior  aggregation  precisely  coinciding 
with  the  future  fission  line  and  the  posterior  granules  somewhat 

diffuse. 

C.  Division  leaves  about  half  the  carbohydrate  reserves  in 

each  cell.    (After  Tartar,  1959a.) 

by  the  fact  that  such  operations  on  dividing  animals  at  stages  5  and 
6,  when  the  division  line  is  already  determined,  do  yield  products 
which  are  approximately  equal.  It  therefore  appears  that  such 
interferences  have  a  marked  effect  on  whatever  determines  the 
level  of  the  fission  line,  shifting  it  far  forward  from  its  usual 
position.  A  rare  case  of  division  in  a  fusion  complex  of  parts  of 
two  stentors  suggests  that  the  fission  line  may  also  be  laid  down 
far  posterior  of  its  normal  location  (Fig.  i8b). 


GROWTH    AND    DIVISION 


8l 


Fig.  1 8.     Experimental    conditions    affecting    location    of   the 
division  furrow. 

A.  Head  only  of  stage-4  divider  excised;  furrow  is  shifted 
forward  with  result  that  proter  is  only  half  the  volume  of  the 
opisthe.      Proter    begins    regeneration    only    after    fission    is 

completed. 

B.  Oral  side  of  a  coeruleus  grafted  transversely  to  animal  from 
which  anterior  end  was  excised.  Unusual  subsequent  dividing 
off  of  an  anucleate  product  without  an  oral  primordium  {x) 
indicates  how  extensively  process  of  division  may  be  upset  by 

m  i  sarrangements . 

By  centrifugation,  Popoff  (1909)  was  able  to  produce  unequal 
fissions  in  coeruleus.  The  macronucleus  was  also  unequally  divided, 
yielding,  for  example,  a  small  cell  with  3  nodes  and  a  larger  one 
with  1 6.  Presumably  the  level  of  the  fission  line  was  located  other 
than  normally,  though  no  details  w^ere  given.  Prowazek  (1904) 
likewise  reported  unusual  cases  of  shift  in  the  fission  level  leading 
to  unequal  daughter  cells,  as  did  Packard  (1937),  without  being 
clearly  aware  of  what  he  was  observing.  Altogether,  these  studies 
show  that  the  fission  line  becomes  fixed  beyond  altering  only  late 
in  division,  and  can  be  shifted  in  its  location  by  earlier  influences. 


4.  Incitement  to  division 

No  one  yet  knows  what  causes  a  cell  to  divide  and  Stentor  is  no 
exception.  In  all  the  experiments  on  stentors  by  myself  and  others 
no  operation  has  been  established  as  promptly  and  invariably 
leading  to  cell  division.  Yet  the  search  for  the  inciting  cause  is  so 
important  that  it  is  appropriate  to  discuss  the  few  eflForts  that  have 
been  made  in  this  direction  with  stentors.  Generally,  stentors 
attain  a  certain  maximum  size  before  dividing,  i.e.,  dividers  are 


82  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

found  only  among  the  largest  animals.  All  we  can  assert,  however, 
is  that  whatever  precipitates  division  is  usually  correlated  with 
size  increase,  for  many  circumstances  demonstrate  that  size  alone 
is  not  the  determining  factor.  Stentors  of  smaller  than  maximum 
volume  can  divide,  and  yet  when  many  stentors  are  grafted  together 
the  combined  **  cell ",  of  extraordinary  mass,  generally  shows  no 
tendency  whatever  toward  fission. 

The  idea  that  division  is  caused  by  a  progressive  deviation  from 
some  normal  ratio  of  macronuclear  volume  to  cytoplasmic  volume 
(Popoff,  1909;  Causin,  1931)  does  not  seem  to  be  confirmed  in 
Stentor.  It  is  sufficient  to  say  that  in  a  variety  of  experiments  in 
which  nucleus  or  cytoplasm  is  at  once  added  or  subtracted  there  is 
no  clear  evidence  of  division  occurring  promptly  as  a  consequence. 
Nor  does  micronuclear  mitosis  trigger  division  (Weisz,  1951b) 
because  (a)  mitosis  occurs  near  the  end  of  fission  (Johnson), 
(b)  reorganizers  and  regenerators  also  show  mitoses  though  not 
dividing,  (c)  emicronucleate  stentors  divide  (Schwartz),  (d)  and 
many  other  amicronucleate  ciliates  reproduce  normally. 

In  certain  unpublished  experiments  I  have  found  that  when  the 
membrane  liar  band  or  the  mouthparts  alone  are  removed  from 
rather  large  specimens  the  stentors  almost  always  promptly 
divided  and  the  resulting  anterior  daughters  with  the  abbreviated 
feeding  organelles  then  regenerated  a  new  set  (see  Fig.  39B).  The 
same  operation  performed  on  the  smallest  stentors  in  the  culture, 
however,  yielded  no  divisions  at  all.  Hence  the  combination  of  size 
with  this  specific  operation  seems  to  have  done  the  trick,  but  further 
study  is  needed. 

Weisz  (1956)  conceived  that  the  problem  of  division  in  Stentor 
could  be  approached  by  determining  the  effect  on  smallest,  post- 
fissional  coeruleus  of  large  pre-divisional  and  dividing  cells  grafted 
to  them.  First  he  fused  largest  animals  which  were  soon  to  divide 
but  which  had  not  yet  produced  a  division  primordium  with 
smallest  cells  or  products  of  recent  division  which  therefore  would 
not  be  expected  to  divide  until  they  doubled  their  size.  Division 
of  the  larger  partner  was  then  greatly  delayed  but  this  could  be 
attributed  to  injuries  of  operation  since  ungrafted  controls  also 
postponed  fission  if  they  were  sliced  into.  After  this  delay  a 
division  primordium  finally  appeared  in  the  larger  partner, 
followed  by  an  induced  primordium  in  the  smaller,  promptly  if 


GROWTH    AND    DIVISION  83 

the  connection  between  the  two  components  was  quite  intimate; 
and  the  complex  then  divided  as  a  unit,  often  separating  into  two 
proters  and  a  doublet  opisthe. 

When  the  larger  partner  had  already  entered  division  and 
carried  an  early  division  primordium,  its  division  was  still  delayed 
and  the  anlage  was  resorbed  after  grafting.  Again,  this  response 
could  be  attributed  to  the  operation,  because  control  animals  also 
resorbed  the  primordium  with  cutting  injuries  and  did  not  re- 
commence division  until  6  hours  later.  In  the  graft  combination, 
primordia  then  appeared  in  both  large  and  small  components 
which  divided  simultaneously  about  6  to  7  hours  later. 

If  the  dividing  partner  was  in  mid-stage  division  with  a  well 
formed  membranellar  band,  grafting  then  resulted  only  in  arrest 
of  the  anlage  and  not  in  its  resorption.  An  induced  primordium 
then  appeared  in  the  small  component  which  divided  along  with 
the  larger.  But  if  the  divider  had  already  advanced  to  the  stage  at 
which  mouthparts  were  beginning  to  form  at  the  posterior  end  of 
the  primordium,  then  no  secondary  anlage  was  induced  and  fission 
was  largely  confined  to  the  side  of  the  original  divider.  Yet  there 
still  could  be  some  effect  on  the  smaller  component.  If  the  macro- 
nuclear  nodes  of  the  divider  had  not  yet  clumped,  then  those  of  the 
small  partner  coalesced  also.  Weisz  further  stated  that  a  division 
furrow  sometimes  extended  around  the  smaller  component,  but  I 
suspect  from  what  has  already  been  said  concerning  blockage  of 
the  division  line  that  in  these  cases  the  furrow  passed  above  or 
below  the  smaller  graft. 

These  results  were  interpreted  by  Weisz  as  demonstrating  that 
pre-divisional  animals  or  stentors  in  early  stages  of  fission  can 
induce  fission  in  graft  partners  which  otherwise  would  not  have 
divided,  and  that  this  induction  is  produced  by  some  influence 
emanating  from  the  dividing  cell  and  passing  to  its  partner.  I  am 
obliged  to  say,  however,  that  these  demonstrations  are  in  need  of 
further  clarification  and  control  before  such  conclusions  can  be 
asserted  with  certainty.  If  dividers. are  grafted  to  regenerators 
one  might  expect  that  division  would  be  the  more  easily  induced 
because  the  non-dividing  partner  already  carries  a  primordium; 
instead,  I  found  that  fission  occurred  only  on  the  side  of  the 
divider  and  did  not  include  the  partner,  which  merely  regenerated. 
Furthermore,  combinations  like  Weisz's  did  not  always  yield  the 


84  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

same  result  and  frequently  when  dividers  were  grafted  to  non- 
dividing  animals  the  complex  then  simply  reorganized  doubly, 
the  single  division  primordium  first  resorbing,  to  be  followed  by 
two  anlagen  which  served  only  to  replace  the  original  feeding 
organelles  and  no  furrow  formation  occurred  (see  Figs.  38D  and  c). 
In  only  one  case  did  I  obtain  what  appeared  like  a  prompt  and 
indubitable  induction :  a  stage-2  divider  was  grafted  to  a  small  non- 
divider,  the  division  primordium  was  not  resorbed  and  another 
was  induced  in  the  smaller  component,  whereupon  simultaneous 
division  occurred;  and  yet  the  same  result  was  obtained  in  one 
case  when  a  stage- 1  regenerator  was  used  in  place  of  the  divider, 
though  fission  then  proceeded  more  slowly.  Further  studies, 
however,  may  firmly  establish  a  phenomenon  of  induced  division, 
and  if  so,  this  would  afford  great  potentialities  for  causal  analysis 
of  division  in  Stentor. 

5.  Persistence  of  division 

Clues  to  the  nature  of  the  fission  process  may  be  sought  in  its 
persistence  in  spite  of  often  drastic  operations.  Long  ago,  Balbiani 
(1891c)  reported  a  case  in  which  a  longitudinal  half  of  a  stage-6 
divider  completed  fission  without  either  a  nucleus  or  the  division 
primordium.  In  other  instances,  whether  of  aboral  or  adoral 
halves,  the  division  products  did  not  separate  though  it  was  clear 
that  the  cortical  striping  had  been  divided  into  two  systems 
because  double  cell  shapes  resulted.  This  was  also  the  experience 
of  Stevens  (1903)  who  obtained  division  without  separation  in 
aboral  halves  and  even  in  one  enucleated  oral  half,  which  correlated 
with  her  studies  of  the  year  preceding  showing  that  enucleated 
halves  of  sea  urchin  eggs  are  still  capable  of  division.  Much  later 
Schwartz  (1935)  described  one  instance  of  complete  division  into 
two  daughter  cells  after  removal  of  the  macronucleus  from  what 
was,  to  judge  from  his  drawings,  a  stage-6  divider.  This  has  been 
confirmed  by  de  Terra  (1959)  and  myself.  Yagiu  (1951)  found  the 
same  in  Condylostoma,  and  Suzuki  (1957)  in  Blepharisma.  These 
cases  show  that  there  is  some  ''momentum"  in  the  processes  of 
division,  or  that  after  the  primordium  is  well  formed  the  final 
shifts  in  the  disposition  of  the  anlage  as  well  as  the  cutting  of  the 
cortical  striping  into  two  systems  and  even  their  total  separation 
can  be  effected. 


GROWTH    AND    DIVISION  85 

-In  de  Terra's  study  on  coeruleus  it  was  demonstrated  that  during 
fission  the  uptake  of  radiophosphorus  (P^")  dropped  to  one- 
twentieth  its  rapid  predivisional  rate  and  was  in  fact  the  same  as 
that  of  enucleated  dividers  from  which  the  compacted  macro- 
nucleus  had  been  removed.  This  indicates  that  the  large  nucleus 
is  not  very  active  biochemically  at  the  time  of  fission  and  thus 
helps  to  explain  why  division  can  continue  to  completion  in  its 
absence. 

Extension  of  studies  on  persisting  division  called  for  operations 
on  still  earlier  stages  of  dividers.  In  recent  tests  yet  unpublished  I 
found  that  division  in  Stentor  coeruleus  can  go  ahead  after  some 
rather  drastic  operations  and  often  when  the  division  process  is 
by  no  means  nearing  completion.  Dividers  in  stages  2  to  5  were 
cut  in  two  transversely  but  the  two  halves  allowed  to  heal  in  place. 
The  primordium  also  rejoined  its  parts  and  division  could  be 
consummated  in  a  perfectly  normal  manner.  Stage  4  dividers  were 
cut  longitudinally  and  the  oral  half  rotated  180°  on  the  other  in 
heteropolar  orientation;  furrow  formation  still  occurred  and 
division  was  nearly  complete  although  the  division  products  did 
not  separate  (Fig.  19A).  The  mouthparts  of  dividers  in  stages  2,  3 
and  4  were  excised  and  the  cells  either  split  down  the  back  and 
opened  out  flat  or  cut  and  spread  out  in  three  parts  like  a  clover 
leaf,  and  still  division  often  followed,  yielding  proters  which 
regenerated  the  missing  mouthparts  later.  Isolated  longitudinal 
halves  of  dividers  cut  before  there  is  any  visible  sign  of  a  furrow 
(stage  5)  could  cut  the  striping  and  form  furrows.  Usually  the 
fragment  did  not  actually  separate  into  two  pieces,  as  others  have 
also  found ;  yet  in  two  cases  at  the  preceding  stage  4,  longitudinal 
oral  halves  did  complete  division.  These  tests  clearly  indicate  that 
the  division  process  is  not  so  delicate  and  precisely  adjusted  that 
disturbances  cause  its  undoing. 

The  oral  primordium  was  excised  from  dividers  as  early  as 
stage  3  and  the  animals  continued  division.  Because  the  headless 
opisthes  later  formed  oral  structures  through  a  regeneration 
primordium  we  can  infer  that  the  macronucleus  was  also  divided. 
Well-formed  primordia  at  stage  4  were  also  circumscribed  and 
rotated  180°  in  situ  and  subsequent  fission  was  still  successful. 
These  experiments,  as  well  as  certain  of  the  aforementioned, 
show  that  although  the  fission  line  begins  at  the  anterior  end  of  the 


86 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


primordium  this  site  is  by  no  means  the  necessary  initiator  of 
furrow  formation.  The  same  is  also  indicated  by  a  case  in  which 
the  primordium  of  a  stage-3  divider  was  shifted  to  the  posterior 
end;  the  cell  still  divided  in  two  (Fig.  19B).  Nevertheless  if  for 
any  reason  the  dividing  stentor  resorbs  the  oral  primordium  itself, 
division  is  then  not  continued  (Weisz,  1956;  Tartar,  1958c). 


A 


B 


Fig.  19.    Persistence  of  division  in  spite  of  major  disturbances; 
separation  of  a  heteropolar  pair. 


GROWTH    AND    DIVISION  87 

Division,  but  without  separation  of  the  products,  can  even 
occur  though  both  nucleus  and  primordium  are  excised  before 
there  is  any  visible  beginnings  of  the  fission  line  (Fig.  19c). 

Total  removal  of  the  macronucleus  as  early  as  stage  4  does  not 
always  preclude  division  even  though  complete  development  of 
the  primordium  cannot  occur  without  nuclear  support.  However 
necessary  for  the  original  stimulus  to  divide,  the  macronucleus,  as 
Yagiu  (1951)  also  found  in  Condylostoma,  does  not  seem  to  be  the 
immediate  trigger  for  the  actual  process  of  fission.  (Micronuclei 
are  of  course  not  concerned,  because  Schwartz  (1935)  showed  that 
growth  and  division  occur  in  stentors  from  which  these  nuclei 
have  been  removed.)  At  stage  5,  when  the  division  line  is  presum- 
ably being  determined,  the  cell  can  be  cut  through  with  a  glass 
needle  following  exactly  the  path  which  the  furrow  will  take,  or  in 
stage  6,  when  the  furrow  is  visible,  it  can  be  slashed  through  with 
the  needle  around  its  entire  course,  and  still  division  is  completed. 
Together,  these  operations  indicate  that  the  division  furrow  is  not 
a  structural  elaboration ;  for  if  it  were,  the  nucleus  would  presum- 
ably be  indispensable  for  the  synthesis  of  new  parts,  and  because 
any  specialized  **  organelle  of  division  "  would  be  destroyed  by  the 


A.  a :  Left  half  of  stage-6  divider  rotated  in  polarity  reverse 
of  that  of  right  half,  with  no  fission  line  yet  begun,  b,  h' : 
Furrows  develop  along  predetermined  course  in  both  halves,  as 
seen  in  ventral  and  dorsal  views,  but  not  joining,  c:  Hence 
daughter  cells  held  together  by  cytoplasmic  connections,  only 

later  pulling  apart. 

B.  S.  coeruleus  continues  division  and  anlage  develops  com- 
pletely though  stage-3  primordium  shifted  to  the  posterior  end. 
a:    The     operation;    b:     resulting    arrangement;     c:    fission 

consummated. 

C.  Continued  fission  of  stage-6  divider  after  both  nucleus 
and  primordium  removed  before  any  sign  of  cutting  of  stripes 
to  form  the  fission  line,  a:  The  operation,  excision  of  the 
anlage  patch  and  clumped  macronucleus.  b:  Division  nearly 
completed  but  products  held  togethe-r  by  a  cytoplasmic  bridge 
probably  due  to  cortical  pattern  disturbances  from  cutting. 
c:  Substance  of  opisthe  now  largely  absorbed  into  the  proter. 

D.  Tail-to-tail  heteropolar  grafts  easily  pull  apart;  but  even 
head-to-head  pairs  like  this,  in  which  the  heteropolar  striping 
does  not  join,  also  can  separate  or  "divide"  neatly  by  a  course 

which  was  not  observed. 


88  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

Operations  just  described.  Instead,  it  appears  again  that  furrow 
formation  involves  only  the  severing  of  longitudinal  structural 
elements  of  the  ectoplasm,  v^hich  was  merely  hastened  or  abetted 
by  the  needle.  Constriction  is  probably  due  to  the  action  of  contrac- 
tile elements  largely  already  formed. 

Cutting  of  stripes  alone  does  not  result  in  fission  however.  The 
ectoplasm  of  non- dividing  cells  can  be  completely  cut  through 
around  the  equator  and  division  never  follows,  the  cortical  struc- 
tures merely  healing  together,  often  without  leaving  any  indication 
of  the  operation.  Conversely,  in  abnormal  situations  one  some- 
times finds  stentors  in  which  complete  furrowing  seems  to  have 
occurred  but  division  does  not  follow.  These  cases  indicate  the 
importance  of  constriction  in  division,  for  it  is  almost  certain  that 
had  constriction  occurred,  this  type  of  specimen  would  have  been 
divided  in  two. 

Division  is  not  the  only  means  by  which  two  separate  stentor 
individualities  can  become  separated.  Fusion  masses  of  two  or 
more  stentors  show  a  strong  tendency  for  the  components  to  pull 
apart.  This  is  especially  the  case  in  the  heteropolar  pairs,  whether 
joined  by  the  heads  (Fig.  19D)  or  the  tails;  for  when  stripes  of 
opposite  polarity  meet  it  is  quite  evident  that  they  do  not  join  and 
at  this  locus  of  discontinuity  a  separation  may  occur. Weisz  (1951a) 
remarked  that  separations  of  tail-to-tail  telobiotics  are  ''strikingly 
reminiscent  of  vegetative  division";  yet  they  are  different  in  that 
pulUng  apart  requires  a  long  time  for  completion,  as  if  sharply 
localized  constriction  could  not  occur  at  all. 

By  growing  coeruleus  in  what  were  probably  rather  putrid 
cultures  of  beef  extract,  Stolte  (1922)  produced  animals  with  highly 
vacuolated  endoplasm  which  showed  many  anomalies  of  division. 
Animals  could  divide  into  three  parts  instead  of  two,  producing 
posterior  daughter  cells  without  primordia  or  nuclei,  or  showed 
very  unequal  divisions  yielding  abnormally  small  opisthes.  A  case 
of  partial  vertical  fission  was  even  described  which  resulted  in  an 
animal  with  two  holdfasts.  Since  the  conditions  were  obviously 
abnormal,  the  interpretations  offered  seem  dubious;  yet  these 
observations  suggest,  as  Weisz  (1956)  proposed,  that  the  endo- 
plasm is  important  in  division,  vacuolization  greatly  disturbing 
whatever  its  function  may  be. 

Postponed  fission,  in  which  division  is  much  delayed  but  eventu- 


GROWTH    AND    DIVISION  89 

ally  realized,  may  be  regarded  as  another  manifestation  of  the 
persistence  of  division.  I  have  observed  (see  Fig.  64A)  repeatedly 
that  dividing  stentors  do  eventually  undergo  fission  even  though 
the  original  process  may  be  cancelled  by  causing  the  primordium 
to  be  resorbed,  or  by  intervening  reorganization  or  regeneration 
even  with  loss  of  cytoplasm  (Tartar,  1958b).  The  response  is  as  if, 
once  stimulated  to  divide,  a  stentor  is  bound  to  do  so  eventually, 
in  spite  of  intervening  catastrophies.  This  recalls  the  interesting 
hypothesis  of  Swann  (1954),  originating  from  studies  of  egg 
cleavage.  He  conceived  that,  as  a  separate  mechanism,  the  cell 
builds  up  a  reservoir  of  something  which  is  essential  to  or  stimula- 
tive of  division  alone,  so  that  this  store  is  depleted  only  by  division. 
Adapting  this  idea  to  Stentor,  greatly  postponed  division  could  be 
the  consequence  of  presence  and  persistence  of  a  reservoir  of  this 
factor  which  is  not  exhausted  by  other  intervening  acts  of 
morphogenesis. 

Reproduction  by  division  in  a  form  like  Stentor  normally  in- 
volves first  the  transformation  of  one  individuality  into  two, 
followed  by  the  physical  separation  of  the  two  individualities  pro- 
duced. The  integrative  tendency  of  the  organism  toward  unitary 
wholeness,  which  theoretical  biologists  have  generally  emphasized, 
is  therefore  suspended  or  violated  during  reproduction  in  ciliates. 
From  this  observation,  together  with  numerous  phenomena  in  the 
regeneration  of  multicellular  forms,  we  are  led  to  suppose  that  the 
organism  is  in  an  important  aspect  beyond  individuality,  though 
tending  to  individuate  as  one  or  more  than  one,  depending  on 
circumstances.  Of  this  we  shall  have  more  to  say  in  the  con- 
cluding chapter.  For  the  present  it  is  sufficient  to  say  that 
"wholeness"  is  no  metaphysical  principle  which  organisms  are 
compelled  to  maintain  and  is  in  fact  transgressed  every  time  a 
stentor  divides. 

Stentor  also  bears  on  another  issue  which  in  the  past  at  least 
has  been  prominent  in  biology :  namely,  whether  a  fully  differenti- 
ated cell  is  capable  of  division.  If  not,  then  regeneration  of 
metazoa  would  imply  either  dedifferentiation  of  cells  or  the 
presence  of  "embryonic  cells"  still  capable  of  rapid  fission  and 
pluripotential  differentiation  (see  Bronsted,  1955).  Basing  his 
argument  largely  upon  the  fact  that  apostomatous  ciliates  undergo 


90  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    ST EN TOR 

detorsion  of  the  lateral  striping  (kinetics)  preceding  fission,  and 
thus  apparently  return  to  a  more  primitive  state  of  differentiation, 
Lwoff  (1950)  maintained  that  division  does  require  a  more 
embryonic  state  and  that  '*  The  ciliates  have  solved  the  problem  of 
perpetuating  complex  adult  structure  by  cyclical  dedifferen- 
tiation  ".  Although  this  statement  may  apply  to  apostomes  and  to 
forms  like  Euplotes  which  form  new^  feeding  organelles  for  both 
proter  and  opisthe,  it  is  not  apropos  of  Stentor  in  which  pre- 
existing cytoplasmic  differentiations  are  obviously  passed  on  to 
the  daughter  cells,  and  therefore  cannot  be  generalized.  I  think 
that  the  important  point  is  that  most  ciliates  do  not  dedifferentiate 
before  or  during  fission  until  they  are  quite  formless  and  then 
divide.  For  it  is  apparent  enough  in  the  example  of  Stentor  that 
maintenance  of  the  complex  structures  of  lateral  striping  which 
continue  their  ciliary  and  contractile  functions  throughout  this 
process  and  are  simply  cut  in  two  is  not  incompatible  with 
division,  and  that  therefore  cell  division  does  not  necessarily  require 
that  a  cell  regress  below  a  high  state  of  differentiation. 

Persistence  of  cortical  differentiations  in  dividing  stentors  also 
precludes  surface  tension  changes  as  a  means  of  cell  division  in 
these  forms  and  their  allies,  and  the  separation  of  asters  in  a 
mitotic  figure  is  also  ruled  out.  Studies  on  cleaving  eggs  in  which 
these  and  other  forces  seem  to  be  operating  hence  cannot  be  taken 
as  characteristic  of  all  cell  divisions.  Perhaps  we  can  learn  from 
Stentor  of  other  factors  equally  important  or  effective,  especially 
with  regard  to  multiplication  of  tissue  cells.  It  has  been  amply 
demonstrated  above  that  stentors  can  be  operated  upon  during 
fission  in  many  ways  which  afford  a  promising  approach  to  prob- 
lems of  cell  division,  as  it  has  also  been  shown  that  the  questions 
of  differential  growth  even  within  the  confines  of  a  single  cell  are 
in  this  organism  amenable  to  experimental  analysis. 


CHAPTER   VI 

REORGANIZATION 

At  seemingly  irregular  intervals  stentors  form  an  oral  primordium 
which  serves  neither  for  division  nor  regeneration  but  merely 
replaces  oral  structures  already  present.  This  has  been  called 
reorganization  or  physiological  regeneration.  As  these  terms  imply, 
it  has  been  supposed  that  this  act  is  a  necessary  renewal  of  worn-out 
organelles,  but  this  is  by  no  means  certain  and  the  real  meaning  of 
the  act  is  still  to  be  ascertained.  The  problem  of  this  peculiar 
redifferentiation  of  the  cell  is  not  unique  to  Stentor.  Reorganization 
also  occurs  in  the  related  Condylostoma  (Tartar,  1957b)  and 
Bursaria  (Lund,  1917),  as  well  as  in  many  other  ciliates. 

The  course  of  reorganization  in  coeruleus  was  well  described 
by  its  discoverer,  Balbiani  (1891a).  To  this  description  Schwartz 
(1935)  added  many  significant  details  in  the  most  complete  and 
best  illustrated  account  in  the  literature,  and  additional  points 
were  contributed  by  others,  as  will  be  noted. 

1.  The  course  of  reorganization 

The  first  indication  of  reorganization  is  the  beginning  of  an  oral 
primordium.  Approximately  at  mid-body  level  below  the  mouth- 
parts  a  splitting  of  pigmented  stripes  occurs  as  in  division, 
but  multiplication  of  clear  and  granular  stripes  is  not  so  extensive 
(Fig.  20).  The  good  reason  for  this  is  that  a  complete  new  adoral 
field  is  not  to  be  formed  but  only  an  addition  to  the  old  one.  As 
the  primordium  lengthens  and  develops,  its  anterior  end  meets 
the  old  membranellar  band  at  the  point  where  the  latter  begins 
to  form  the  margin  of  the  oral  pouch.  At  stage  5  the  original 
mouthparts  begin  to  dediflferentiate.  Macronuclear  beads  start  to 
fuse  and  form  a  compact  mass  by  stage  6,  beginning  renodulation 
at  stage  7.  According  to  Weisz  (1949a),  some  of  the  terminal  nodes 
may  not  fuse  and  if  this  occurs  they  break  free.  He  also  reported 
that  endoplasmic  streaming  carries  the  clumped  nucleus  as  well 

91 


92 


as 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


any  free  nodes  forward  to  a  position  directly  under  the 
developing  primordium  and  he  claimed  that  this  is  a  precise  and 
invariant  event  in  reorganization,  though  neither  Schwartz  nor  I 
confirm  this.  Essentially,  the  macronucleus  clumps  and  renodulates 
without  dividing. 


b     ^  c    ^         d 

Fig.  20.    Course  of  reorganization  (S.  coeruleus). 

a:  Morphologically  complete  animal  shown  with  stage-3 
primordium.  b:  Stage-4  anlage  intirriately  joining  with  original 
membranellar  band,  c:  During  stage-6  of  primordium  develop- 
ment the  old  band  between  joining  point  and  mouthparts, 
together  with  those  parts,  is  resorbed.  d:  New  mouthparts 
and  addition  to  membranellar  band  moving  into  place  and 
carrying  new  fine  stripes  into  the  frontal  field  which  now  shows 
a  double  pattern,  2  swirls. 


Since  the  granular  carbohydrate  reserves  in  the  posterior  end 
of  the  cell  undergo  remarkable  shifts  in  division,  their  behavior 
during  reorganization  should  be  noted.  Weisz  reported  that  the 
granules  remained  in  place  without  change,  but  I  observed  that 
generally  they  diffuse  forward  under  the  ectoplasm  though  not 
separating  into  two  groups  (Tartar,  1959a).  The  chief  resemblance 
between  reorganizers  and  dividers  is  that  in  both  cases  a  primor- 
dium is  formed  although  feeding  organelles  are  already  present. 
In  the  tendency  of  the  carbohydrate  reserves  to  migrate  there  is 
also  a  slight  similarity,  but  points  of  distinct  difference  are  that 
no  second  contractile  vacuole  is  formed  during  reorganization 
(Johnson,  1893)  and  of  course  no  fission  line. 

The  anterior  end  of  the  anlage  now  fuses  with  the  original 
membranellar  band,  often  causing  a  slight  deflection  where  it 
joins ;  and  the  section  of  the  old  band  between  this  juncture  and 
the  mouthparts  then  dedifferentiates  and  is  resorbed  along  with 
the  last  traces  of  the  gullet.  The  original  oral  pouch  apparently  is 


REORGANIZATION  93 

not  resorbed  but  simply  rises  and  flattens  out  to  the  level  of  the 
adoral  field  with  whose  stripes  its  own  are  continuous.  As  the 
primordium  migrates  forward  and  carries  with  it  some  ecto- 
plasmic  striping  to  the  right,  new  and  old  frontal-field  stripes  are 
brought  together,  but  though  homopolar  they  do  not  join.  Instead, 
the  anterior  ends  of  the  new  stripes  are  pulled  over  to  the  point 
where  the  old  mouthparts  dissolved  and  the  resulting  frontal  field 
therefore  shows  two  swirls  of  striping  (Fig.  2i).This  doubleness 
is  an  enduring  character  which  identifies  stentors  that  have  under- 
gone reorganization,  a  sign  which  is  often  useful  in  following  the 
performance  of  experimental  animals.  Sometimes  one  finds 
stentors  with  three  disjunctive  systems  of  striping  in  the  frontal 
field,  indicating  that  these  animals  have  twice  reorganized,  though 
they  may  be  proters  from  an  ensuing  division. 


Fig.  21 .  Anterior  end  view  of  a  coeruleus  which  had  reorganized 
twice,  showing  muhiple  pattern  of  frontal  field. 

After  the  reorganization  primordium  is  nearing  completion, 
a  secondary  stripe  multiplication  occurs  just  below  the  newly- 
forming  oral  region  quite  as  in  the  opjsthe  of  dividers,  as  pointed 
out  by  Schwartz.  This  stripe  increase  will  form  a  new  ramifying 
zone  and  completes  the  reorganization  process.  It  now  remains  to 
report  what  has  been  done  toward  analyzing  the  sequential  events 
in  reorganization  and  above  all  to  inquire  into  its  possible  signifi- 
cance for  the  life  of  the  organism. 


94 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


2.  Analysis  of  the  reorganization  process 

There  have  been  few  experiments  on  reorganizing  stentors  and 
this  area  of  study  is  prickly  with  paradoxes,  but  I  have  some 
unpublished  data  which  is  suggestive.  These  relate  to  the  central 
question  whether  resorption  of  mouthparts  is  uniquely  character- 
istic of  animals  in  process  of  reorgnization. 

When  the  aboral  half  of  the  membranellar  band  is  removed,  an 
oral  primordium  is  formed  and  as  it  moves  into  place  the  original 
mouthparts  remaining  are  resorbed  (Fig.  22A).  Is  this  regeneration 
or  reorganization?  Such  cases  are  like  regeneration  in  compensating 


A 


a    ^  b     ^        .'    c  ^  d 

Fig.  22.   Observations  relating  to  reorganization. 

A.  When  one  half  or  more  of  the  membranellar  band  is  excised 

delayed  formation  of  a  regeneration  primordium  follows  and 

original  mouthparts  are  resorbed  as  in  reorganization. 

Regenerant  then  gains  a  peristome  of  normal  length. 


REORGANIZATION  95 

for  an  excised  part,  but  they  resemble  reorganization  because  the 
mouthparts  are  replaced.  Both  Schwartz  (1935)  and  Weisz  (1951b, 
1954)  called  this  reorganization,  and  this  may  be  permissible;  for 
if,  in  such  cases,  the  well-formed  primordium  at  stage  4  is  removed 
by  a  minimal  excision  or  caused  to  be  resorbed,  the  mouthparts  are 
still  completely  resorbed,  the  animals  then  regenerating  later 
(unpublished).  The  same  occurs  with  true  reorganizers,  bearing 
complete  feeding  organelles  (b).  It  would  appear  that  in  reorgani- 
zers and  regenerators  with  mouthparts,  these  structures  are  pre- 
determined to  be  resorbed.  In  contrast,  an  adaptive  resorption  of 

B.  Primordium  of  reorganizer  excised  at  stage  4,  before  visible 
resorption  of  mouthparts  has  begun.  Oral  structures  neverthe- 
less subsequently  resorbed  though  there  are  no  new  ones  to  take 

their  place.    Regeneration  follows. 

C.  a:  Stage-5  primordium  grafted  to  a  non-differentiating 
host,  b:  Developing  anlage  breaks  into  the  oral  zone,  joining 
with  the  original  membranellar  band,  a  section  of  which  is 
resorbed  to  permit  incorporation  of  the  new  mouthparts.  This 
imitates  band  resorption  in  reorganization,  but  the  host  mouth- 
parts are  not  resorbed  and  a  doublet  stentor  results  (c). 

D.  Stage-5  reorganizer  with  head  circumscribed  and  rotated 
180°.  Original  mouthparts  are  resorbed,  although  now  on  side 
opposite  to  primordium.  Anlage  breaks  into  the  peristome,  free 

ends  of  same  join  on  far  side  and  a  normal  stentor  results. 

E.  Specimen  reorganizing  after  anterior  was  rotated  on  the 
posterior  half.  The  primordium  formed  far  down  on  the  side  of 
the  cell  yet  the  old  mouthparts  and  adjacent  section  of  mem- 
branellar band  were  resorbed  as  if  the  anlage  were  normally 
located.  Later  the  new  organelles  moved  forward,  joined  with 
the  original  membranellar  band  and  produced  a  normal  stentor. 

F.  Stage-4  reorganizer  grafted  to  non-differentiating  stentor. 
a:  By  stage  6,  the  reorganizer  (right)  had  induced  a  transient 
reorganization  primordium  in  its  partner.  Both  original  sets  of 
mouthparts  were  resorbed,  as  also  the  out-of-phase  accessory 
anlage.  c:  Partner  left  without  oral  structures  now  regenerating, 
with  induced  re-reorganization  in  the  other  animal.  Oral  resorp- 
tion may  therefore  extend  to  other  mouthparts  present  in  the 

graft  systein. 

G.  a:  Parabiotic  graft  of  two  stage-2  dividers,  b:  No 
division  occurred,  and  the  anlagen  moved  forward  instead  but 
the  original  mouthparts  were  not  resorbed  as  in  reorganization. 
c:  Specimen  then  produced  two  reorganization  primordia  and 
all  four  pre-existing  sets  of  mouthparts  were  resorbed  as  the 

usual  doublet  was  formed  {d). 


96  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

sections  of  the  membranellar  band  is  shown  by  the  observation 
that  late  regeneration  primordia  grafted  into  the  backs  of  non- 
differentiating  cells  can  and  frequently  do  break  into  the  oral  ring 
through  a  localized  resorption  of  the  membranellar  band  (c).  This 
interpolation  also  occurs  in  reorganizing  stentors  in  which  the 
head  has  been  rotated  180°  in  place,  but  now  the  mouthparts  are 
also  resorbed  though  on  the  far  side  of  the  cell  (d). 

There  are  other  evidences  that  oral  resorption  is  a  separate  and 
predetermined  part  of  the  reorganization  process.  In  one  interesting 
case  the  stentor  was  transected  and  the  anterior  half  rotated  180° 
on  the  posterior.  This  specimen  then  reorganized.  Because  of  the 
disarrangement  of  the  striping,  the  anlage  remained  for  a  long 
time  in  a  diagonal  position  across  the  center  of  the  cell  yet  the 
mouthparts  and  adjacent  membranellar  band  were  resorbed  long 
before  the  primordium  moved  forward  (e).  It  is  also  pertinent 
that  mid-stage  reorganizers  can  induce  transient  primordium 
formation  in  non-differentiating  cells  to  which  they  are  grafted; 
reorganization  goes  to  completion  on  the  reorganizer  side  and  the 
mouthparts  of  the  other  component  are  also  resorbed  although 
there  is  not  a  new  set  to  take  their  place  (f). 

On  the  contrary,  it  appears  that  in  the  state  of  division  or 
regeneration  there  is  little  predisposition  for  the  feeding  organelles 
to  be  resorbed.  When  two  stage-2  dividers  were  grafted  together 
in  homopolar  parabiosis  division  did  not  continue,  the  two 
primordia  moved  forward  but  the  original  mouthparts  remained 
intact  (g).  True  reorganization  then  followed,  in  which  all  four  of 
the  existent  oral  parts  were  resorbed. 

These  experiments  suggest  that  in  reorganization  the  mouth- 
parts are  somehow  invisibly  dissociated,  or  cut  off  morphologically, 
and  therefore  usually  predestined  to  dedifferentiation.  This 
interpretation  seems  to  be  supported  by  the  fact  that  if  re- 
generation is  induced  by  excising  the  head  and  a  new  head  is  then 
grafted  back  into  place  later,  then,  if  the  primordium  continues 
developing,  reorganization  ensues  and  the  old  mouthparts  are 
resorbed  (see  Fig.  37B).  Also  if  the  heads  of  non-differentiating 
stentors  are  circumscribed  and  rotated  180°  in  place,  reorganiza- 
tion follows  in  the  majority  of  cases.  So  in  both  types  of  experi- 
ment it  would  seem  that  isolating  the  whole  set  of  feeding  organ- 
elles has  the  same  effect  as  the  hypothetical  disjunction  of  the 


REORGANIZATION 


97 


oral  region  only.  It  should  also  be  mentioned  that  although  injury 
to  the  cell  usually  causes  resorption  of  early  primordia  in  dividers, 
this  occurs  very  rarely  in  reorganizers.  In  every  case  w^hen  early, 
stage-2  reorganizers  w^ere  split  into  a  clover-leaf  shape  the  primor- 
dium  was  not  resorbed  and  the  animals  completed  reorganization 
after  the  parts  of  the  cell  fused  together.  Such  persistence  of  the 
anlage  almost  always  did  not  occur  in  dividers  unless  the  mouth- 
parts  were  also  excised  at  the  time  the  cell  was  split.  Therefore  the 
reorganizers  behaved  as  if  their  mouthparts  were  not  present,  i.e., 
as  if  these  parts  were  effectively,  if  cryptically,  isolated  somehow 
from  the  rest  of  the  cell.  This  hypothetical,  morphological  dis- 
junction of  parts  would  be  of  a  subtle  nature,  however — possibly 
at  the  level  of  fine  fiber  structures — for  when  I  tried  to  duplicate 
it  by  sectioning  the  membranellar  band  with  a  needle  at  the  point 
where  it  meets  the  oral  pouch,  the  band  merely  mended  together 
and  there  was  no  reorganization.  Obvious  isolation  of  mouthparts 


Fig.  23.  "Autotomy"  of  mouthparts. 
a:  Head  of  stentor  rotated  180°  with  mouth  now  opposite  the 
primordium  site,  h:  Several  days  later  the  mouthparts  —  such 
as  are  resorbed  in  reorganization  :^—  separate  from  the  mem- 
branellar band  and  move  into  the  frontal  field,  with  ends  of  the 
band  rejoining  behind  them.  Then  a  "reorganization"  primor- 
dium appears,  c:  Old  mouthparts  cut  into  the  frontal  field  are 
then  resorbed,  together  with  part  of  the  membranellar  band 
which  permits  integration  of  the  anlage  to  produce  a  stentor  of 
normal  orientation. 


98  THE  BIOLOGY  OF  STENTOR 

by  cutting  and  shifting  does  act  as  a  stimulus  to  primordium 
formation  although  no  portion  of  the  feeding  organelles  is  excised. 
Even  when  heads  were  rotated  180"  in  place  and  primordium 
formation  did  not  occur  at  once,  a  remarkable  readjustment  of  the 
cell  pattern  took  place  (Tartar,  1959b)  as  shown  in  Fig.  23.  The 
mouthparts,  including  the  oral  pouch  and  its  membranellar  margin 
were  autonomously  severed  and  thrust  in  towards  the  center  of 
the  frontal  field  while  the  membranellar  band  closed  together.  In 
the  primodium  site  there  appeared  a  "reorganization"  anlage 
which  eventually  broke  into  the  oral  ring  and  provided  a  new  set 
of  mouthparts,  now  in  the  correct  location.  In  this  performance 
we  see  that  the  very  structures  which  are  resorbed  in  the  normal 
course  of  reorganization  can  in  fact  be  "  autotomized  ". 

3.  Stimulus  to  reorganization  and  the  significance  of  this 
process 

The  seemingly  adventitious  occurrence  of  reorganization  in 
stentors,  which  appear  to  be  the  same  as  their  non-reorganizing 
fellows,  gives  the  impression  of  a  quite  unnecessary  act  which 
leaves  the  animal  just  as  it  was  before.  Hence  the  enigmatic 
character  of  reorganization.  Yet  we  naturally  assume  that  ciliates 
would  not  go  through  this  complicated  process  without  good 
reason,  and  several  hypotheses  have  been  advanced  in  the  case 
of  Stentor,  though  there  is  none  w'hich  has  not  left  its  residue  of 
paradoxes. 

(a)    To  REPLACE  DEFECTIVE  MOUTHPARTS? 

On  discovering  reorganization,  Balbiani  (1891a)  suggested  that 
the  process  is  for  replacement  of  worn-out  ingestive  organelles. 
The  act  would  therefore  be  essentially  the  same  as  regeneration 
which  is  evoked  by  removal  of  these  parts.  Having  well  observed 
that  the  entire  membranellar  band  is  not  replaced,  Balbiani 
(1891a)  assumed  that  the  mouthparts  are  the  most  "used"  and 
therefore  the  most  subject  to  deterioration;  but  there  was  also  a 
hint  in  his  initial  report  that  aging  alone  might  result  in  these  parts 
eventually  becoming  defective.  Among  modern  students  of  Stentor, 
Weisz  (1954)  accepted  this  interpretation  of  the  raison  d'etre  of 
reorganization  and  emphasized  (1951b)  that  injury  or  defect 
might  be  either  structural  or  functional,  justifying  the  term  physio- 


REORGANIZATION  99 

logical  regeneration.  In  either  case  there  should  be  less  successful 
feeding  and  one  would  expect  that  reorganizers  would  appear 
under-fed,  transparent,  and  with  few  if  any  food  vacuoles.  But  as 
I  recently  pointed  out  (Tartar,  1958c)  reorganizers  are  quite  as 
replete  as  their  fellows.  In  fact,  Weisz  (1949a,  1954)  almost 
implied  this  himself  in  explaining  that  pigment  granules  and 
carbohydrate  reserves  are  not  decreased  and  utilized  in  re- 
organization as  they  are  in  regeneration  because  reorganizers  can 
continue  feeding. 

There  are  other  strong  objections  to  the  defect  hypothesis. 
Johnson  (1893)  independently  discovered  reorganization  in 
Stentor  and  he  seems  to  have  followed  Balbiani's  interpretation, 
yet  he  described  a  case  of  two  successive  reorganizations  in 
coeruleus  which  cannot  be  explained  on  the  improbable  assumption 
that  the  mouthparts  just  formed  by  the  first  primordium  had 
become  defective  through  use  or  aging.  Then  Morgan  (1901a) 
noted  that  in  most  instances  the  old  feeding  organelles  of  re- 
organizers are  still  active  and  appear  entirely  normal,  though  this, 
he  said,  w^as  not  always  the  case.  In  my  own  studies,  I  talUed  36 
cases  in  which  newly-formed  feeding  organelles,  wholly  normal 
in  appearance,  were  promptly  subjected  to  reorganizational 
replacement,  quite  apart  from  the  fact  that  in  graft  stentor  com- 
plexes repeated  reorganization  is  the  rule  (Tartar,  1954).  These 
cases  cannot  be  explained  on  the  defect  hypothesis  unless  one 
supposes,  against  all  appearances  to  the  contrary,  that  the  pre- 
ceding differentiation  was  inadequate. 

If  the  mouthparts  wear  out,  this  should  occur  sooner  in  proters 
which  retain  the  old  ones;  yet  Hetherington  (1932b)  did  not  find 
reorganization  in  the  continued  isolation  of  proters  for  five 
generations,  i.e.,  of  feeding  organelles  five  generations  old.  Finally, 
and  most  conclusively,  one  can  specifically  injure  the  mouthparts 
by  thrusting  a  needle  down  the  gullet  and  cutting  laterally,  where- 
upon the  injury  is  simply  repaired  and  no  reorganization  follows 
(Tartar,  1957c)  (see  Fig.  33B). 

(b)  Response  to  change  in  the  medium? 

Hetherington  (1932b)  was  strongly  of  the  opinion  that  re- 
organization does  not  occur  in  stentors  under  constant  conditions 
of  culture,  and  that  reorganization  if  it  occurs  at  all,  is  brought 


\Uj  I  I  IBRARY   ]:>! 


-^'.V  '^^ss- 


lOO  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

about  by  changes  in  the  medium,  not  necessarily  unfavorable, 
such  as  transfer  from  old  to  fresh  culture  fluid.  It  may  be  that 
reorganization  is  a  response  to  disproportionality  of  cell  parts  (see 
below)  and  that  under  the  most  uniform  conditions  growth  in  all 
parts  proceeds  so  harmoniously  that  no  disproportion  arises.  But 
Hetherington's  argument  is  vitiated  by  several  contradictions. 
First,  he  says  that  no  physiological  regeneration  occurs  in  stentors. 
Then  he  admits  that  he  did  find  *'reorganizers"  in  unchanged 
stock  cultures  of  coeruleus.  To  explain  this,  he  asserted  that  such 
animals  were  regenerating  from  cryptic  injuries;  and  he  stated 
that  renewal  of  mouthparts  is  not  the  same  as  reorganization  though 
he  did  not  offer  a  different  definition.  He  said  that  his  animals 
were  invaded  by  bacilli  from  which  they  were  freed  by  repeated 
transfers  into  new  medium,  during  which  reorganizations  were 
frequent;  but  then  it  might  be  held  that  the  infection  was  really 
the  cause  of  reorganization.  Hetherington's  contribution,  then, 
was  to  direct  attention  to  changes  in  the  culture  medium  as  a 
possible  cause  of  reorganization;  and  to  raise,  if  not  resolve,  the 
question  whether  replacement  of  worn  out  or  injured  mouthparts 
should  not  properly  be  called  regeneration,  as  reasonably  as  when 
excisions  are  the  inducement. 

That  '*  depression  "  conditions  in  the  culture  may  be  the  cause 
of  reorganization,  though  not  the  only  or  principal  one,  was  also 
suggested  by  Balbiani  (1891a),  and  Weisz  (1949a)  assumed  the 
same;  but  Causin  (1931)  found  that  unfavorable  conditions  never 
seemed  to  cause  reorganization.  Merely  adding  new  water  to  the 
cultures  was  said  to  bring  about  reorganization  (Weisz,  1949a). 
Yet  it  is  difficult  to  see  how  such  a  mild  stimulation  as  change  in 
the  medium  could  elicit  reorganization  when  the  most  severe 
cutting  injuries  involved  in  many  stentor  experiments  do  not. 
I  therefore  also  question  Causin's  (1931)  remark  that  if  the  tailpole 
is  cut  off  a  stentor  the  cell  then  undergoes  a  partial  reorganization 
as  if  in  response  to  a  mild  injury.  He  did  not  describe  what 
happened  beyond  saying  that  the  nucleus  did  not  clump  together 
completely. 

Stentors  in  small  drops  under  cover  slips  are  incited  to  divide  as 
well  as  to  reorganize,  according  to  Balbiani  (1891a),  but  this  cer- 
tainly does  not  occur  with  regularity  in  depression  slides.  I 
reported  (Tartar,  1958c)  that  a  dilute  solution  of  methyl  cellulose 


REORGANIZATION  lOI 

brought  about  extensive  reorganizations  in  a  stentor  sample,  but 
this  procedure  was  not  easily  reproducible. 

(c)  Need  for  nuclear  reorganization  ? 

In  one  of  his  cytochemical  studies,  Weisz  (1950b)  reported  that 
in  the  chain  macronucleus  of  coeruleus  a  gradient  in  affinity  for 
methyl  green  seems  to  develop  in  anticipating  reorganizers  and 
pre-fissional  animals,  the  posterior  nodes  staining  less  intensely. 
In  both  cases,  after  clumping  and  renodulation  the  nuclear  beads 
stained  uniformly.  In  this  there  is  the  implication  that  re- 
organization might  be  to  reinstate  uniformity  of  composition  of 
the  nucleus  in  animals  vv^hich  for  some  reason  are  not  yet  able  to 
divide.  But  Weisz  did  not  say  so  explicitly,  perhaps  because  he 
found  reorganizers  in  "all  cycle  stages",  i.e.,  at  any  time  during 
the  interfissional  period. 

(d)  For  growth  of  the  adoral  band  ? 

It  will  be  recalled  from  the  account  of  the  reorganization  process 
that  important  new  additions  to  the  membranellar  band  and  the 
frontal  field  take  place,  while  only  the  gullet  and  the  border  of  the 
oral  pouch  are  obviously  resorbed.  Therefore  a  considerable 
enlargement  of  the  head  should  result.  Schwartz  (1935)  carefully 
counted  the  membranelles  and  found  that  approximately  twice  as 
many  are  added  as  are  resorbed.  This  suggested  to  him  that  re- 
organization may  be  a  periodic  growth  process  serving  in  part  for 
the  increase  in  the  length  of  the  membranellar  band  as  well  as 
perhaps  the  enlargement  of  the  mouthparts.  Favoring  this  concep- 
tion is  the  finding  that  if  for  any  reason  the  primordium  produces 
too  small  a  head,  with  a  short  membranellar  band  and  limited 
frontal  field,  reorganization  soon  occurs  with  resulting  enlargement 
of  these  parts  (Tartar,  1958b). 

In  at  least  one  case,  however,  I  found  that  when  an  extra  head 
was  grafted  to  a  stentor  and  this  fused  with  the  original  to  form 
a  supernormal  number  of  membranelles,  reorganization  never- 
theless occurred.  There  are  other  arguments  against  the  growth 
hypothesis.  When  there  are  repeated  reorganizations  the  membran- 
ellar band  does  not  become  of  exaggerated  length.  We  are  obliged 
to  assume  that  the  immediate  increase  results  in  a  compensatory 
resorption  of  membranelles  in  some  part  of  the  band.  Only  in 


102  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

grafted  doublet  and  triplet  stentors  does  the  frontal  field  and 
membranellar  band  become  much  enlarged  over  the  normal,  as  if 
the  excessive  girth  of  these  complexes  could  support  a  larger 
structure.  It  seems  clear  that  reorganization  is  not  an  essential 
growth  process,  for  otherwise  it  should  occur  with  great  regularity. 
Considering  only  the  opisthe,  a  daughter  cell  starts  with  a  set  of 
feeding  organelles  which  appears  to  be  proportionate  to  the  cell 
volume  and  therefore  about  half  the  size  of  those  of  the  parent 
cell.  If  the  membranellar  band  can  increase  only  by  adding  new 
membranelles  through  primordium  formation,  reorganization 
should  occur  always  before  the  next  division  and  probably  at  a 
certain  time  when  disproportion  sets  up  a  tension.  But  re- 
organization does  not  occur  with  regularity  and,  ever  since 
Balbiani,  it  has  been  observed  that  stentors  of  any  size  can  be 
found  reorganizing.  This  includes  even  very  tiny  individuals, 
which  I  can  vouch  for,  as  well  as  animals  in  which  the  oral  struc- 
tures do  not  appear  in  any  way  disproportionate  to  the  cell  size. 

(e)  Need  for  adjustment  of  nuclear  dimensions  ? 

Although  Balbiani  did  not  find  an  increase  in  the  number  of 
macronuclear  nodes  following  reorganization,  Johnson  reported 
that  this  was  usually  the  case.  Of  i8  reorganizers,  he  found  that  14 
increased  the  number  of  macronuclear  nodes,  2  remained 
unchanged  in  this  respect,  and  2  even  decreased  the  number  of 
nodes.  The  increase  was  sometimes  to  twice  the  original  number 
of  nuclear  beads,  but  the  new  ones  seemed  to  be  smaller.  Therefore 
he  suggested  that  reorganization  is  for  the  purpose  of  increasing 
the  active  surface  but  not  the  size  of  the  macronucleus,  or  that 
the  surface-volume  relation  is  adjusted  as  required,  even  in  the 
direction  of  decrease.  I  may  mention  here  that  I  have  also  observed 
cases  of  decrease  in  nodal  number  following  reorganization  of 
regenerated  stentor  fragments  that  contained  too  much  nuclear 
material. 

A  striking  demonstration  of  this  correlation  between  nuclear 
size  and  reorganization  was  given  by  Schwartz  when  he  showed 
that  reorganization  could  be  induced  at  will  by  cutting  out  most 
of  the  nuclear  beads.  Weisz  (1951a)  and  I  have  confirmed  this. 
When  only  one  or  two  nodes  were  left,  they  at  first  enlarged  the 
surface   by  becoming  spindle   shaped,  just   as   Prowazek   (1904) 


REORGANIZATION  IO3 

had  previously  observed.  This  earlier  investigator  also  noted  that 
without  primordium  formation  and  nuclear  clumping  there  are  at 
most  only  one  or  two  nodes  which  may  divide.  Schwartz  com- 
pletely cinched  the  point  by  showing  that  regeneration  of  the 
depleted  macronucleus  occurs  only  after  primordium  formation, 
when  there  is  also  a  mitotic  division  of  the  micronuclei  leading  to 
their  increase  in  number.  Moreover,  such  an  increase  in  the  nuclear 
complement  seemed  definitely  to  be  called  for,  because  he  found 
that  the  "entire  metabolism"  of  stentors  with  reduced  nucleus  is 
upset.  After  great  reduction  of  the  macronuclear  volume  there 
may  follow  a  series  of  reorganizations,  according  to  Schwartz,  with 
the  implication  that  in  each  only  a  limited  increase  in  the  macro- 
nucleus  is  possible.  This  I  have  also  observed. 

That  mitotic  multiplication  of  the  micronuclei  occurs  during 
reorganization  when  there  is  the  increase  in  the  number  of  macro- 
nuclear  nodes,  Schwartz  deduced  as  follows.  If  one  assumes  that 
in  division  there  is  but  a  single  mitosis  of  each  micronucleus  so 
that  the  total  number  is  only  doubled,  then  the  demonstrated 
presence  of  about  the  usual  number  of  these  nuclei  in  both 
daughter  cells  of  a  stentor  which  had  previously  been  induced  to 
reorganize  by  removing  most  of  the  macronucleus  (and  therefore 
most  of  the  adhering  micronuclei)  implies  that  the  micronuclei  as 
well  as  the  macronuclear  nodes  must  have  increased  during  the 
reorganization.  Furthermore,  it  has  been  demonstrated  directly 
in  Blepharisma  that  micronuclear  mitosis  accompanies  reorganiza- 
tion (Suzuki,  1957). 

It  may  well  be  that  anything  which  may  lead  to  a  macronucleus 
becoming  too  small  for  the  cell  volume  results  in  reorganization. 
The  essence  of  reorganization  would  then  not  lie  in  the  fact  that 
the  mouthparts  are  replaced,  for  this  also  occurs  after  excision  of 
substantial  lengths  of  the  membranellar  band.  Nor  would  it  be  a 
response  to  injured  or  worn-out  mouthparts,  since  this  is  essentially 
regeneration  and  the  evidence  for  this  condition's  being  the  neces- 
sary cause  of  reorganization  is  overwhelmingly  in  the  negative. 
Changing  the  medium  does  not  in  my  experience  act  as  a  stimulus 
to  epidemics  of  reorganization,  and  reorganizers  are  found  in 
cultures  that  have  not  been  altered.  Hence  it  would  seem  proper  to 
regard  reorganization  as  a  wholly  spontaneous  and  intrinsic 
response  to  certain  disproportionalities  or  disarrangements  of  parts 


104  '^"^    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

of  the  cell  which  is  for  the  purpose  of  bringing  them  into  a  more 
normal  relationship. 

Deserving  special  emphasis  is  the  point  that  the  macronucleus 
seems  to  be  as  much  dependent  on  a  cytoplasmic  primordium 
formation  for  its  growth  as  the  primordium  is  dependent  on  it. 
Hence  it  could  be  that  when  the  macronucleus  needs  adjusting  to 
the  cell  volume,  the  mouthparts  are  cryptically  **  autotomized  ",  as 
suggested  above,  in  order  to  incite  anlage  formation  without  which 
the  nucleus  cannot  undergo  extensive  alterations. 


CHAPTER    VII 

REGENERATION 

Stentors  have  long  been  the  preferred  subject  for  studies  on 
regeneration  in  the  protozoa  because  of  the  large  size  of  common 
species,  their  amenabiHty  to  cutting  operations,  and  the  elaborate 
system  of  cortical  differentiations  which  calls  for  a  substantial 
performance  in  morphogenesis  and  provides  a  definite  end-point 
for  experiments.  It  must  have  been  a  dramatic  moment  v^hen 
Nussbaum  (1884)  extended  to  the  ciliates  the  earlier  experiments 
of  Greeff,  1867,  and  Brandt,  1877,  on  heliozoa  in  demonstrating 
the  general  *' divisibility  of  living  matter"  at  the  cell  level.  Of 
course  cells  divide,  but  now  it  was  shown  that  man  could  do  the 
dividing  himself  with  similar  results.  A  year  later  Gruber  (1885a, 
1885b)  published  his  finding  that,  in  contrast  to  division,  stentors 
can  be  cut  into  three  pieces,  each  of  which  could  produce  a  new 
individuality,  and  his  drawing  of  the  regeneration  of  a  trisected 
stentor  was  reproduced  in  dozens  of  textbooks.  He  proved  that 
regeneration  was  in  fact  complete,  for  the  fragments  not  only 
regained  the  normal  form  but  could  then  subsequently  grow  and 
divide.  These  studies  were  carried  forward  by  Balbiani  in  a  series 
of  notable  early  investigations.  Following  these  pioneers,  investiga- 
tors have  turned  repeatedly  to  Stentor  as  a  form  in  which  regenera- 
tion and  reconstitution  can  be  studied  within  the  confines  of  a  cell, 
the  "  structural  unit  of  life  ". 

I.  The  course  of  regeneration 

(a)  Oral  regeneration  and  its  requirements 

Excision  of  the  head  or  any  appreciable  portion  of  the  feeding 
organelles  leads  to  oral  regeneration.  A  primordium  appears  on 
the  side  of  the  cell  and  then  moves  forward  to  the  anterior  end  as  it 
develops  a  new  set  of  ingestive  structures.  If  any  part  of  the 
original  membranellar  band  and  frontal  field  remain,  they  persist 
and  are  integrated  into  the  new  head  (Stevens,  1903).  But  if  only 

105 


io6 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Fig.  24.  Stages  in  oral  regeneration  following  excision  of  feeding 
organelles  (S.  coeruleus.) 

Stage  I.    Anterior  end  healed  over  and  primordium  appears 
as  a  rift  across  fine  striping  near  area  of  widest  stripes.   (Omitted 
stages  correspond  to  those  in  the  development  of  the  oral  anlage 
in  division  —  see  Fig.  14.) 

Stage  5.    Primordium  with  expansion  at  posterior  end  where 
mouthparts  will  form.    Multiplication  of  fine  stripes  within  the 
arc   of   the    anlage   which   will    form    the    new   frontal    field. 
Macronu clear  nodes  coalescing. 

Stage  6.    Invagination  of  the  end  of  the  primordium  to  form 

cytostome  and  gullet.    Nucleus  compacted,  but  usually  not  as 

much  as  in  division.    Stripe  multiplication  below  anlage  will 

form  a  new  fine-line  zone  and  recover  approximately  the  normal 

number  of  lateral  stripes. 

Stage  7.    Gullet  and  cytostome  now  well  formed  and  oral 
pouch    invaginating    as    primordium    moves    to    anterior   end. 
Macronucleus  renodulating.    (After  Tartar,  1957c.) 


REGENERATION  I07 

the  membranellar  band  suffers  ablation,  the  old  mouthparts  are 
resorbed  as  the  new  ones  take  their  place.  Regeneration  has  been 
staged  according  to  visible  changes  in  the  primordium  (Tartar, 
1957c)  as  in  Fig.  24. 

Just  as  regeneration  can  occur  in  starving  metazoa,  so  in  Stentor 
the  process  imposes  no  nutritive  demand.  Weisz  (1949a)  remarked 
that  in  regeneration  of  coeruleus  there  is  an  extensive  loss  of  pigment 
granules  which  he  presumed  to  be  utilized  in  supporting  primor- 
dium formation,  since  this  occurred  in  posterior  and  middle 
fragments  but  not  in  anterior  pieces  which  do  not  have  to  produce 
a  new  set  of  feeding  organelles.  I  too  have  often  noticed  a  fading 
in  the  animals,  which  seems  to  be  correlated  in  degree  with  the 
number  of  times  they  undergo  primordium  formation,  though 
this  is  not  always  apparent.  Carbohydrate  reserve  granules  may 
be  utilized  in  regeneration,  if  this  can  be  dissociated  with  their 
employment  in  mere  survival;  and  Weisz  (1948b)  claimed  that 
oral  regeneration  could  not  occur  in  the  absence  of  these  reserves 
or  their  potential  equivalent  in  the  form  of  food  vacuoles,  but  this 
could  not  be  confirmed  (Tartar,  1959a).  Regeneration  or  further 
development  of  a  regeneration  primordium  already  begun  can, 
however,  be  greatly  delayed  by  cold  (Morgan,  1901a). 

Apart  from  the  necessity  for  the  presence  of  a  segment  of  the 
macronucleus,  the  character  of  cutting  injuries  and  ablations  im- 
poses few  limitations  on  regeneration  potentialities.  Central-disc 
fragments  with  widely  exposed  endoplasm  folded  upon  themselves 
to  cover  the  wound  surfaces  and  neatly  regenerated  (Fig.  25A). 
Collapsed  stentor  "skins"  from  which  almost  all  the  endoplasm 
has  been  squeezed  out  easily  regenerated  and  recovered  the 
normal  plump  form  (b),  quite  as  in  similar  tests  with  Condylostoma 
(Tartar,  1941b).  When  almost  all  the  ectoplasm  was  sliced  off,  the 
patch  remaining  greatly  stretched  to  cover  the  exposed  endoplasm 
and  regeneration  was  consummated  (c).  But  endoplasmic  spheres 
completely  bereft  of  ectoplasm  never  regenerated,  though  they 
remained  intact  and  alive  (insofar  as  they  resisted  bacterial  attack) 
for  two  days  (Tartar,  1956c). 

These  tests  effectively  dispose  of  the  notion  (Prowazek,  1913; 
Sokoloff,  1924;  Weisz,  1948a)  that  the  ratio  of  ectoplasm  to  endo- 
plasm (how  measured  ?)  cannot  be  altered  far  from  an  optimum  if 
regeneration  is  to  be  possible,  as  well  as  the  opinion  that  wound 


io8 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


healing  is  an  important  factor  in  regeneration  (Causin,  1931; 
Weisz,  1948a).  Weisz's  (1951b)  statement  that  any  portion  of  the 
endoplasm  is  capable  of  supporting  regeneration  is  subsumed  in 
the  fact  that  no  significant  amount  of  endoplasm  is  needed  at  all. 


Fig.  25.  Regeneration  of  coeruleus  under  severe  conditions. 


A.  Mid-ring  fragments  regenerate  in  spite  of  extensive  wound 
surface  and  exposure  of  endoplasm,  because  the  piece  folds  to 
cover  surface  with  ectoplasm  and  anlage  promptly  appears  in 
short  section  of  original  primordium  site.   A  normal  stentor  can 

be  formed  within  a  day. 

B.  Specimens  with  collapsed  ectoplasm  after  removal  of 
practically  all  the  endoplasm  by  vigorous  pipetting  can  regenerate 

and  fill  out  the  cell  shape  within  a  day. 

C.  In  nucleated  endoplasmic  spheres  with  almost  all  the 
cortical  layer  excised  the  remaining  ectoplasm  stretches  to  cover, 
with  granular  bands  becoming  excessively  broad  and  pale. 
Here  the  reconstitution  was  abnormal  and  the  primordium, 
appearing  on  the  "wrong"  side,  produced  a  stentor  of  reversed 
asymmetry.  Usually  such  specimens,  with  greatly  reduced 
ectoplasm  do  not  live  or  regenerate,  possibly  because  even 
maximum  stretching  cannot  achieve  a  cortical  continuum  with 

no  "edges".   (After  Tartar,  1956c.) 


REGENERATION 


109 


A 


C 


Fig.  26.   Experiments  concerning  holdfast  regeneration. 

A.  Removal  of  posterior  portion  of  primordium-site  sector 
is  followed  by  temporary  tail  formation  from  cut  ends  of  the 
lateral  striping;  but  the  anteriorly  located  extension  is  later 
resorbed  in  favor  of  holdfast  reconstitution  at  original  posterior 

pole.    (After  Weisz,  1951b.) 

B.  Temporary  tail-pole  formation  at  suture  may  occur  when 
anterior  is  rotated  on  posterior  half.  Misaligned  stripes  do  not 
rejoin  and  projection  occurs  in  oral  meridian  of  anterior  half, 

but  is  soon  resorbed  as  stripe  patterns  interpenetrate. 

C.  a:  Sector  with  stage-3  regeneration  primordium  grafted 
heteropolar  into  a  non-differentiating  host,  b :  Anlage  is  resorbed 
and  temporary  pedal  pole  formation  occurs  from  posterior  end 
of  graft,  c:  Extra  tail  resorbed,  graft  patch  diminished,  and 
specimen  reorganizing  doubly,  d:  Short,  anterior  primordium 
contributes  only  a  sector  {x)  of  membranellar  band,  forming  no 

mouthparts. 


no 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


(b)  Regeneration  of  the  holdfast 

This  occurs  much  more  readily  and  quickly  than  oral  regenera- 
tion. It  can  even  take  place  in  the  absence  of  the  nucleus  (Tartar, 
1956c).  Within  2  hours  after  excision  a  new  attachment  organelle 
is  formed  (Morgan,  1901a;  Weisz,  1951b).  By  removing  holdfasts 
and  posterior  portions  of  the  left  boundary  stripe  of  the  ramifying 
zone,  Weisz  showed  that  a  new  tail  was  then  produced  at  the 
posterior  terminus  of  the  stripes  remaining,  even  if  this  led  to  a 
holdfast  appearing  forward  and  projecting  laterally  (Fig.  26a). 
(Actually  a  substantial  portion  of  the  ramifying  zone  must  have 
been  removed.)  The  regenerated  holdfast  then  moved  toward  the 
posterior  pole,  possibly  through  an  accelerated  growth  of  the 
striping  anterior  to  it.  When  the  original  holdfast  was  not  removed 
the  new  one  was  soon  resorbed.  I  have  found  that  when  a  stentor 
is  cut  in  two  transversely  and  the  anterior  half  rotated  180°  on  the 
posterior  so  that  the  lateral  striping  is  out  of  alignment  and  does 
not  rejoin,  a  new  tail  is  sometimes  formed  and  projects  temporarily 
from  the  oral  meridian  of  the  anterior  part  (b).  Likewise,  if  the 
ramifying  zone  is  circumscribed  and  rotated  in  place  its  posterior 
end  regenerates  a  new  holdfast  projecting  forward  (c).  Consonant 
with  these  results,  Weisz  offered  two  important  principles  of 
holdfast  regeneration:  first,  the  presence  of  one  good  organelle 


Fig.  27.  Unusual  tail-pole  and  holdfast  formation  in  folded 
non-oral  halves,  a:  Longitudinal  cut  through  the  axis  to  yield 
aboral  half  lacking  widest  and  narrowest  pigment  stripes,  b: 
Wound  healed  by  folding  which  brings  head  and  tail-poles 
together,  polarities  indicated,  c:  Lateral  striping  is  self-severed 
across  the  sharp  bend  of  the  fold,  giving  same  appearance  as  a 
fission  line.  Oral  primordium  develops  where  widest  granular 
stripes  lie  adjacent  to  their  attenuated  extensions,  d:  Cut  ends 
of  striping  drawn  together  to  form  a  new  pole.  Original  half-tail 
extends  temporarily  but  is  later  resorbed  as  the  new  holdfast 
becomes  functional  {e).   (After  Tartar,  1956b.) 


REGENERATION  III 

tends  to  inhibit  the  formation  or  persistence  of  an  extra  holdfast, 
and  second,  that  free  posterior  ends  of  one  or  more  stripes  in  the 
ramifying  zone  are  inductive  of  tail  formation. 

Surprisingly,  a  new  posterior  pole  and  holdfast  can  be  formed 
in  a  way  which  one  would  never  expect  to  occur  in  the  usual  life 
of  stentors  (Tartar,  1956b).  As  Balbiani  had  noticed,  longitudinal 
aboral  halves  tend  to  fold  on  themselves  to  close  the  wound,  and  if 
this  situation  persists,  a  new  pole  is  formed  at  the  point  of  bending. 
There  one  observes  that  the  pigment  stripes  are  severed  just  as  in 
the  formation  of  a  division  furrow,  the  cut  ends  of  these,  and 
doubtless  of  the  fibrous  alternating  clear  bands  as  well,  are  then 
brought  together  at  a  point  from  which  a  holdfast  emerges  (Fig.  27). 
Sometimes  when  the  original  half-holdfast  persisted  and  moved 
posteriorly  to  a  more  normal  location,  it  was  nevertheless  later 
resorbed  and  replaced  by  the  new  organelle  produced  in  such  an 
odd  manner. 

A  stentor  with  single  head  but  two  tail  poles  and  holdfasts, 
like  a  specimen  found  in  nature  by  Faure-Fremiet  (1906),  was 
produced  when  Balbiani  (1891b)  split  the  posterior  end.  This 
dupHcation  can  also  be  produced  in  Condylostoma  (Tartar,  1941b), 
but  in  either  genus  it  is  much  more  usual  for  the  two  parts  simply 
to  fuse  together  again. 

(c)  Reconstitution  of  the  normal  shape 

Examples  already  given  are  enough  to  indicate  the  strong 
tendency  of  stentors  to  reconstitute  the  normal  shape  and  contour 
of  the  cell.  Later  discussions  will  show  that  this  capacity  is  indeed 
phenomenal,  though  easily  passed  over  because  of  the  slow  pace 
with  which  it  is  pursued.  For  the  present  it  is  sufficient  to  say  that 
no  shape  distortion  of  a  stentor  has  yet  been  produced  from  which 
the  animal  could  not  recover  in  time.  The  gradual  nature  of  the 
processes  involved  was  emphasized  by  Schwartz  (1935),  who 
showed  that  minor  discrepancies  in  the  striping  persisted  for  a 
long  time. 

Apart  from  such  minute  disruptions,  the  shape  of  a  stentor 
seems  to  be  strictly  a  function  of  the  pattern  of  the  striping 
(Tartar,  1954).  When  from  aborted  cleavage  or  for  some  other 
reason  there  is  a  break  in  the  striping,  the  contour  of  the  cell 
shows  a  corresponding  deviation  from  normal  (Fig.  28A)  and  if  the 


112 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Striping  breaks  into  many  patches  the  whole  cell  becomes  knobby 
when  expanded  (see  Fig.  71B).  Likewise,  longitudinal  fragments 
remain  thin  and  elongate  until  they  recover  the  normal  comple- 
ment of  stripes  (see  Fig.  i2a).  If  two  stentors  are  grafted  together 
at  random,  there  is  no  arrangement  from  which  they  cannot  shift 
and  integrate    into  a  normal  shape   (Fig.  28b)    (Tartar,    1954). 


Fig.  28.    Pertaining  to  cell  shape  in  S.  coeruleus. 

A.  Any  discontinuity  in  the  lateral  stripe  pattern  results  in 

corresponding  modification  of  cell  shape. 

B.  Even  head-to-head  telobiotics  can  reconstitute  a  single 
normal  shape  by  jack-knifing  and  fusing.    (After  Tartar,  1954.) 

C.  Doublets  with  mouthparts  proximate  tend  to  form  double 

"cleavage"  shapes. 


Doublet  stentors  are  usually  wide,  but  if  they  become  single,  they 
or  their  progeny  recover  the  normal  number  of  lateral  stripes. 
When  doublets  persist  and  retain  essentially  two  sets  of  body 
striping  there  is  a  strong  tendency  to  develop  a  Siamese  twin  shape 
(c),  showing  again  that  cell  shape  depends  on  the  disposition  of 
the  ectoplasmic  striping. 


REGENERATION  II3 

2.  Nuclear  behavior  during  regeneration 

Not  until  the  primordium  is  already  half  developed  (stage  5) 
do  the  macronuclear  nodes  begin  to  coalesce;  their  fusion  is  not 
so  complete  as  in  reorganization  and  especially  division.  But 
Causin  (1931)  reported  that  regeneration  is  like  abortive  fission  in 
that  the  macronucleus  divides,  the  parts  later  rejoining.  No  one 
else  has  observed  this.  The  point  needs  checking,  in  view  of  Yow's 
(1958)  recent  work  on  Euplotes,  showing  that  in  regeneration  two 
ciliary  anlagen  are  produced,  just  as  in  division,  though  one  is 
promptly  resorbed  and  hence  was  overlooked  by  previous 
investigators. 

In  any  event,  the  compacted  regeneration  nucleus  renodulates 
and  the  number  of  new  nodes  may  not  be  the  same  as  originally. 
Johnson,  confirming  Balbiani  (1889),  remarked  that  there  is  in- 
variably a  slight  increase  in  the  number  of  nodes  after  renodulation. 
The  average  increase  was  from  12 -6  to  16  macronuclear  beads.  If 
the  regenerating  fragment  was  cut  so  as  to  contain  few  nodes  to 
start  with,  there  was  a  substantial  increase  during  regeneration. 
Hence  primordium  formation  in  regeneration  can  be  used  for 
correcting  a  decreased  nucleo-cytoplasmic  ratio,  just  as  Schwartz 
found  for  reorganization.  This  adjustment  of  the  nuclear  size  to 
the  size  of  the  fragment  was  confirmed  by  Weisz  (1949a)  and  is  in 
accord  with  my  own  observations. 

Prowazek  (1904),  too,  found  that  the  number  of  macronuclear 
nodes  always  increased  during  regeneration.  He  further  stated 
that  this  increase  might  occur  even  if  the  stentor  was  only  diagon- 
ally cut  or  injured,  but  he  does  not  seem  to  have  followed  his 
animals  closely  enough  to  exclude  the  possibility  that  an  inter- 
vening reorganization  had  not  occurred.  Evidently  he  believed 
that  any  substantial  cut  or  deletion  of  oral  parts  resulted  in  a 
nodal  increase  which  was  also  an  increase  in  the  absolute  size  of 
the  macronuclear  material,  for  he  stated  that  after  the  invariable 
nuclear  hypertrophy  there  then  occurred  a  subsequent  reduction 
to  the  normal  nucleo-cytoplasmic  ratio.  Thus  in  some  cases  he 
found  that  one  node  of  a  series  was  absorbed,  but  it  might  have 
fused  with  another.  These  observations  should  be  checked 
especially  with  regard  to  real  changes  in  the  macronuclear  volume. 
Increase  in  the  number  of  macronuclear  nodes  following  re- 
generation was  explained  by  Schwartz  (1935)  in  the  following 


114  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

manner.  The  macronucleus  increases  substantially  as  a  rule  only 
during  cell  division ;  therefore  pre-division  stentors,  as  they  grow, 
will  come  to  have  a  decreased  nucleo-cytoplasmic  ratio  or  the 
need  for  more  nuclear  material,  which  will  be  redressed  only 
during  subsequent  fission.  If  regeneration  is  then  brought  about, 
a  stentor  can  take  this  opportunity  of  primordium  formation  to 
make  up  its  lack  and  increase  the  number  of  macronuclear  nodes. 
Then  he  found  that  when  this  happened  and  the  stentor  was  caused 
to  re-regenerate  there  was  now  not  an  increase  in  nodal  number 
because  the  normal  nucleo-plasmic  ratio  had  already  been 
achieved;  and  if  substantial  parts  of  the  cytoplasm  had  been 
removed  there  might  even  be  a  decrease  in  number  or  coalescence 
of  nodes.  However,  in  all  this  Schwartz  doubted  that  there  was  an 
actual  change  in  macronuclear  volume  and  believed  it  more  likely 
that  the  adjustment  was  largely  an  increase  or  decrease  in  the 
effective  surface  of  the  nucleus.  Yet,  in  grafts  of  two  stentors 
sharing  but  one  macronuclear  node  I  found  an  indubitable  increase 
in  nuclear  mass  at  the  end  of  regeneration  (see  Fig.  86b). 

When  a  stentor  is  transected  across  the  longitudinal  axis  the 
macronucleus  is  distributed  about  proportionally;  the  posterior 
fragment  has  to  regenerate  a  new  set  of  feeding  organelles,  while 
the  anterior  does  not  and  serves  as  a  control.  Comparing  these  two, 
Weisz  (1949a)  found  that  in  the  posterior  piece  only  does  macro- 
nuclear coalescence  occur,  as  an  accompaniment  of  primordium 
formation.  More  recently,  Guttes  and  Guttes  (1959)  have  found 
that  mitotic  division  also  occurs  only  in  the  posterior  fragment, 
or  at  least  this  was  demonstrable  in  17  out  of  125  cases.  No  mitoses 
could  be  found  in  either  the  anterior  fragments  or  in  uncut 
controls  not  undergoing  fission.  If  the  exact  time  of  mitosis  is 
somewhat  variable,  this  could  account  for  their  not  always  finding 
it.  They  noted  the  similarity  between  their  results  and  those  of 
Schwartz,  who  deduced  that  micronuclear  multiplication  occurs 
during  reorganization  along  with  macronuclear  increase.  The 
results  showed  that  mitotic  multiplication  of  micronuclei,  as  well  as 
increase  in  the  number  of  macronuclear  nodes  (see  above)  can  take 
place  in  regeneration ;  for  only  the  posterior  fragments  would  have  to 
form  an  oral  primordium  to  replace  the  missing  feeding  organelles. 
This  is  in  accord  with  demonstrations  of  mitosis  in  other  ciliates 
during  regeneration  (Lewin,  191 1 ;  Suzuki,  1957;  and  Yow,  1958). 


REGENERATION  II5 

The  Guttes  assumed  that  both  fragments  regenerated.  This  is 
true  only  insofar  as  the  anterior  fragments  had  to  regenerate  the 
holdfast ;  but  this  makes  no  demands  on  the  nucleus  and  can  even 
occur  in  its  absence.  It  has  long  been  known  (e.g.,  Morgan,  1901a) 
that  anterior  halves  need  not  and  do  not  form  an  oral  primordium. 
Therefore  the  most  important  difference  between  the  two  types  of 
fragment  is  that  oral  anlagen  formation  occurs  only  in  the  posterior 
ones,  and  this  is  somehow  related  to  corresponding  changes  in 
both  macronuclei  and  micronuclei. 

To  the  Guttes,  however,  the  only  difference  between  the  frag- 
ments was  that  the  posterior  halves  lacked  the  feeding  organelles. 
Their  interpretation  is  accordingly  highly  questionable;  for  they 
suggested  that  in  the  posterior  halves  the  phosphoryolytic  energy 
utilized  in  membranellar  beating  could  now  be  diverted  toward 
promoting  mitosis.  Historically,  this  explanation  stems  from  the 
Henneguy-Lenhossek  hypothesis,  1898,  of  the  homology  between 
mitotic  centrioles  and  the  fibrogenic  basal  bodies  of  flagella  and 
cilia.  But  the  application  cannot  be  valid  if  we  accept  Schwartz's 
deduction  (see  p.  103)  that  mitosis  also  occurs  during  reorganization 
of  stentors,  during  which  the  original  membranellar  band  is 
retained  and  continues  actively  beating  as  the  new  one  from  the 
reorganization  anlage  joins  with  it.  Instead,  it  may  be  concluded 
that  regeneration,  reorganization,  and  division  are  so  similar  that 
each  gives  the  cue  for  macronuclear  and  micronuclear  increase; 
and  it  may  be  the  developing  primordium  which  provides  this 
encitement,  as  in  part  suggested  by  Weisz  (1951b).* 

3.  Effective  stimulus  to  regeneration 

That  cutting  injuries  alone,  without  excision  of  parts,  do  not 
result  in  regeneration  or  reorganization  has  been  pointed  out  many 
times.  Morgan  (1901a)  tells  how  he  cut  the  cell  nearly  in  two 
without  effect,  even  if  the  cut  passed  through  the  membranellar 
band.  I  have  found,  however,  that  if  the  feeding  organelles  are  cut 
in  two  and  displaced,  or  if  for  any  other  reason  a  good  set  of  mouth- 
parts  and  a  good  membranellar  band  are  present  but  not  joined, 

*  According  to  Uhlig  (i960)  "  regeneration  "  can  occur  without  primor- 
dium formation,  evidenced  only  by  fusion  and  renodulation  of  the  macro- 
nucleus  and  formation  of  a  new  contractile  vacuole  under  the  wide-stripe 
areas.  Division  also  occurred  without  anlagen  formation  (cf.  Fig.  18B). 


Il6  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

regeneration  will  then  ensue  (Tartar,  1957c).  Causin  (1931)  found 
neither  primordium  formation  nor  nuclear  changes  in  coeruleus 
which  were  cut  into  repeatedly.  Yet  (if  a  repetition  be  allowed  for 
completeness  of  this  account)  he  remarked,  without  giving  further 
details,  that  when  so  cut  the  ''  sectioned  myofibrils  degenerate  and 
new  ones  appear  in  the  pigment  bands  to  replace  them."  Weisz 
(1949a)  also  spoke  of  an  extensive  reorganization  of  "contractile 
equipment "  during  regeneration  and  these  hints  deserve  pursuing. 
Causin  likewise  considered  that  alteration  of  the  nucleo-plasmic 
ratio  would  be  a  sufficient  stimulus  to  regeneration,  but  whatever 
anticipations  he  may  have  had  in  this  direction  are  probably 
covered  by  Schwartz's  demonstration  that  reorganization  follows 
excision  of  major  parts  of  the  macronucleus. 

Even  substantial  portions  of  the  lateral  body  wall  and  endoplasm 
can  be  removed  without  inciting  regeneration,  but  removal  of  any 
portion  of  the  feeding  organelles  is  a  sufficient  stimulus  to  re- 
generation. Excision  of  all  mouthparts  of  course  produces  prompt 
primordium  formation.  If  the  gullet  or  the  oral  pouch  only  is 
removed  regeneration  also  occurs,  or  if  in  morphogenesis  mouth- 
parts  are  produced  which  lack  either  of  these  organelles,  or  are  in 
any  other  way  incomplete,  they  will  be  replaced  by  a  new  set 
through  regeneration  (Tartar,  1957c).  The  mere  act  of  primordium 
formation  therefore  does  not  satisfy  the  requirements  of  re- 
generation, for  there  seems  to  be  a  feedback  mechanism  which 
informs  the  cell  whether  the  resulting  differentiation  has  been 
complete. 

When  only  the  aboral  half  of  the  membranellar  band  is  removed 
regeneration  is  much  delayed  as  a  rule  but  does  occur  eventually. 
The  only  exception  is  that,  if  division  intervenes,  the  abbreviated 
feeding  organelles,  now  on  the  proter,  may  be  approximately  of 
right  proportions  for  this  smaller  cell  and  then  regeneration  does 
not  always  occur.  These  results  are  reminiscent  of  Taylor's  (1928) 
studies  on  Uronychia,  in  which  he  found  that  the  removal  of  one 
cirrus,  or  the  sectioning  of  critical  neuromotor  fibrils  which  could 
then  not  rejoin,  constituted  sufficient  stimulus  for  regeneration. 

Long  ago  Johnson  observed  that  a  double  monster  stentor 
regenerated  doubly,  on  both  sides,  though  it  needed  to  renew  only 
one  of  the  mouths.  Such  observations  were  greatly  extended  with 
the  technique  of  grafting  two  stentors  together.  In  doublet  animals 


REGENERATION  II7 

with  two  complete  sets  of  feeding  organelles  I  found  that  if  one  of 
the  mouthparts  developed  incompletely,  or  if  one  mouth  was 
excised,  or  if  one  complete  set  of  feeding  organelles  was  removed 
without  leaving  remnants  behind,  then  the  remaining  set,  normal 
and  fully  formed,  still  did  not  prove  sufficient.  Regeneration  always 
occurred  on  the  defective  side  with  simultaneous  reorganization 
on  the  other.  The  only  time  when  this  did  not  take  place  was  when 
the  doublet  was  transforming  into  a  single  stentor  and  one  of  the 
primordium  sites  was  disappearing  (Tartar,  1954).  Regeneration 
therefore  may  be  said  to  occur  whenever  a  primordium  site  is  not 
subtended  by  a  complete  set  of  feeding  organelles  normally  joined 
together  in  one  unit. 

4.  Time  for  regeneration 

Clocking  the  time  for  regeneration  may  afford  some  hint 
regarding  the  nature  or  the  order  of  magnitude  of  the  processes 
involved.  At  least  we  can  designate  the  minimum  period  within 
which  any  postulated  reaction  must  be  able  to  accompUsh  a  visible 
result,  and  this  should  offer  some  guide  to  hypothesis.  A  point 
which  is  obvious,  yet  perhaps  deserving  explicit  statement,  is  that 
regeneration  of  lost  parts  is  enormously  more  rapid  in  ciliates  than 
in  multicellular  animals. 

We  have  noted  that  an  excised  tail-pole  and  holdfast  in  Stentor 
coenileus  can  be  re-formed  in  one  to  two  hours,  and  little  or  no 
synthesis  of  new  structures  may  be  involved.  Relating  oral  as  well 
as  pedal  regeneration  to  temperature,  Weisz  found  that  lowering 
the  temperature  10  degrees  increased  the  time  by  a  factor  of  about 
1-6.  He  also  claimed  that  the  presence  of  intact  feeding  organelles 
hastens  foot  formation,  yet  it  is  possible  that  such  formations  are 
retarded  when  the  head  is  excised  merely  because  an  added  burden 
is  thrown  upon  the  cell  (Child,  1949). 

Oral  regeneration  is  by  elaboration  of  a  primordium  and  requires 
more  time.  An  important  distinction  was  emphasized  by  Weisz 
when  he  separated  a  preparatory  period,  as  the  interval  between 
excision  of  parts  and  the  beginning  of  anlage  formation,  from  the 
time  required  for  the  development  of  the  primordium  itself.  The 
former  he  found  to  require  about  4  hours  as  a  rule,  though  the 
figure  can  be  pushed  closer  to  three  if  one  is  careful  to  watch  for 
the  inconspicuous  stage- 1   anlage.    Development  then  proceeds 


Il8  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

at  the  rate  of  about  one  stage  per  hour  and  the  total  time  for 
regeneration  from  the  moment  of  cutting  is  around  8  to  lo  hours 
(Weisz,  1955).  What  may  occur  during  the  preparatory  period  is 
discussed  later  (p.  138). 

In  a  study  of  several  ciliates  other  than  Stentor  but  including 
the  spirotrichous  Spirostumumy  Sokoloff  (19 13)  stated  that  the 
larger  the  fragment  the  sooner  it  regenerates,  but  his  data  indicate 
that  differences  appear  only  when  there  is  a  marked  disparity  in 
size  of  the  pieces.  The  differences  were  explained  on  the  basis 
that  a  hypothetical  physiological  harmony  has  to  be  established 
before  regeneration  and  that  this,  rather  than  regeneration  itself, 
takes  more  time  to  accomplish  in  tiny  fragments.  Weisz  (1948a) 
did  not  find  such  differences  in  Stentor  coeruleus  and  stated  categor- 
ically that,  other  conditions  being  the  same,  the  time  for  both  oral 
and  holdfast  regeneration  is  independent  of  the  initial  size,  pro- 
vided the  piece  is  large  enough  to  permit  any  regeneration.  In  a 
recent  series  of  tests  I  have  found,  however,  that  when  the  head 
and  tail-pole  of  coeruleus  were  excised  and  regeneration  times 
measured  for  the  main  cell  body  and  its  own  polar  fragment  the 
time  for  the  initial  appearance  of  the  oral  anlage  was  with  two 
exceptions  always  greater  in  the  smaller  pieces,  and  the  difference 
was  often  considerable  (unpublished).  Size  therefore  may  have  a 
bearing  on  regeneration  rates. 

The  same  tests  —  in  which  the  posterior  fragment  was 
"  favored  "  by  the  holdfast  —  render  questionable  Weisz's  (1948a) 
contention  that  the  presence  of  a  foot  increases  the  speed  of  oral 
regeneration.  Therefore,  Child's  (1949)  criticism  of  this  point  also 
may  be  valid. 

In  aboral,  longitudinal  halves  which  lack  the  normal  primordium 
site  Weisz  (1951b)  found  that  oral,  pedal,  and  contractile  vacuole 
regeneration  were  much  delayed  —  oral,  as  much  as  30  to  40 
hours.  He  attributed  this  delay  to  the  time  required  for  other 
stripes  to  assume  the  morphogenetic  role  normally  played  by  those 
in  the  part  removed.  I  too  have  found  that  the  preparatory  period 
in  such  fragments  is  usually  very  protracted,  but  there  appear  to 
be  contradictions  that  need  resolving  because  this  was  not  always 
the  case  and  some  of  these  fragments  did  regenerate  promptly 
(Tartar,  1956c).  Likewise,  when  only  the  primordium  site  was 
removed   along  with   the   mouthparts,  the   time   for   beginning 


REGENERATION  II9 

primordium  formation  was  exceedingly  variable,  ranging  from 
5  to  12  hours  (Tartar,  1956a). 

It  is  relevant  here  that  in  doublet  stentors,  with  only  one  set  of 
feeding  organelles  removed,  regeneration  is  usually  prompt 
(Tartar,  1958b),  again  indicating  that  the  remaining  set  of  intact 
organelles  offer  no  inhibition  to  a  primordium  site  which  is  not 
subtended  by  one  of  its  own.  In  single  animals,  however,  the  time 
for  beginning  anlage  formation  does  vary  inversely  with  the  extent 
of  oral  ablations,  recalling  a  similar  rule  by  Zeleny  (1905)  for 
metazoa.  Thus  Morgan  found  that  the  more  of  the  membranellar 
band  removed  the  sooner  regeneration  followed,  and  Weisz  (1948a) 
confirmed  this.  A  similar  relationship  was  demonstrated  in  the 
hypotrichous  Ur onychia  by  Taylor  (1928).  Even  w^hen  there  are 
no  ablations,  re-regeneration  occurs  if  for  any  reason  the  differen- 
tiation of  the  oral  primordium  is  incomplete,  and  the  more 
incomplete  the  sooner  (Tartar,  1957c).  I  also  noted  the  time 
relation  in  regard  to  the  length  of  membranellar  band  removed 
and  found  in  addition  (Tartar,  i959d)  that  if  the  gullet,  buccal  and 
oral  cavity  are  neatly  removed  so  as  to  leave  almost  the  entire  length 
of  membranelles  intact  regeneration  is  still  retarded.  These  experi- 
ments indicate  that  any  portion  of  the  feeding  organelles  is  partially 
inhibitory  of  primordium  formation,  but  all  are  required  to  prevent 
this  formation  entirely. 

Sokoloff  and  others  believed  that  the  ratio  between  volume  of 
nucleus  and  volume  of  cytoplasm  cannot  vary  too  greatly  if  re- 
generation is  to  be  possible,  but  Weisz  (1948a)  found  that  re- 
generation times  are  the  same  in  comparable  fragments  regardless 
of  the  number  of  nuclear  nodes  included,  provided  of  course  that 
at  least  one  was  present.  He  therefore  discounted  the  idea  of 
necessary  nucleo-cytoplasmic  ratios.  With  this  I  can  agree  in 
regard  to  the  range  of  differences  in  the  ratio  which  one  finds  in 
fragments  from  a  single  animal,  yet  it  will  be  shown  later  (p.  306) 
that  the  extreme  decrease  in  the  ratio  of  nucleus  to  cytoplasm 
which  is  made  possible  by  grafting  exp^eriments  does  indeed  result 
in  very  tardy  regeneration.* 

*Uhlig  (i960)  emphasized  the  correlation  between  "  age  "  and  regenera- 
tion time :  this  period  was  shortest  in  young,  post-fissional  animals  which 
were  also  more  reactive  in  producing  primordium  formations  at  multiple 
primordium  sites  from  disturbances  of  cell  patterns. 

I 


I20  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

5.  Minimum  size  of  regenerating  fragments 

Given  at  least  one  macronuclear  node,  how  small  may  a  frag- 
ment be  and  still  regenerate?  In  the  earliest  cutting  experiments 
on  stentors,  Gruber  (1885b)  had  already  found  that  not  only  halves 
and  thirds  but  even  smaller  fragments  of  coeruleus  regenerate  and 
form  tiny  Stentors.  The  embryologist  Lillie  (1896)  raised  the 
question  of  the  limits  of  divisibility  of  stentors  as  leading  to 
significant  theoretical  implications.  Fragmenting  the  ciliates  by 
shaking,  he  found  that  no  piece  smaller  than  i/24th  the  volume  of  a 
large  polymorphiis  regenerated  completely,  and  the  minimal  size 
for  coeruleus  w^as  i/3oth.  Lillie  was  impressed  by  the  fact  that  such 
fragments  are  still  of  considerable  size,  since  they  were  about  80  ju, 
in  diameter,  and  therefore  emphasized  that  the  cytoplasm  is  as 
important  as  the  nucleus  to  regeneration,  postulating  that  there 
is  a  ** minimal  organization  mass"  below  which  the  complete, 
potential  form  of  Stentor  could  not  find  representation.  This  size 
limit  should  be  absolute  rather  than  relative ;  therefore  he  expected 
that  it  would  not  be  exceeded  even  if  one  started  with  smaller  cells 
for  cutting.  Morgan  (1901a)  found  that  pieces  no  larger  than 
I /64th  of  the  whole  coeruleus  could  regenerate  and  this  was  later 
confirmed  by  Stolte  (1922).  Morgan's  minimal  fragments  were  in 
fact  only  slightly  smaller  than  Lillie's  but  they  were  cut  from 
larger  cells.  Recalling  that  there  are  also  lower  limits  to  the  size  of 
regenerates  in  Hydra,  Tubularia,  and  Planaria,  Morgan  offered  a 
first-order  explanation  for  the  failure  in  regeneration  of  very  small 
pieces  in  both  metazoa  and  ciliates,  namely,  that  there  is  simply 
insufficient  material  to  produce  the  typical  form. 

Sokoloff  (191 3)  pursued  this  problem  further  in  the  ciliates 
Dileptus  and  Spirostomum.  The  first  is  suitable  because  the  macro- 
nucleus  is  finely  subdivided  and  widely  distributed,  and  the  second 
because  the  very  elongate  shape  lends  itself  to  cutting  tiny  frag- 
ments. Pieces  i/8oth  the  volume  of  the  whole  cell  could  regenerate. 
Although  fragments  i/iooth  of  the  normal  size  could  be  cut,  these 
did  not  regenerate  or  survive  for  long.  Therefore  Sokoloff  (1934) 
seems  to  have  settled  on  the  idea  that  there  is  really  no  theoretically 
significant  limit  to  the  divisibility  of  ciliates,  and  that  in  practice  a 
limit  is  imposed  only  by  the  circumstance  that  in  smallest  frag- 
ments the  wound  surface  with  its  exposed  endoplasm  is  relatively 
^-SoJ-ajcge  that  the  pieces  become  vacuolated  and  soon  disintegrate. 


REGENERATION  121 

This  conception  was  taken  to  the  extreme  by  Weisz  (1954) 
when  he  stated  that  size  is  not  a  Hiniting  condition  of  regeneration 
in  protozoa  and  that  theoretically  one  molecule  of  deoxyribonucleic 
acid  surrounded  by  a  shell  of  cytoplasm  should  be  able  to  re- 
constitute the  organism.  He  therefore  regarded  the  explanation  of 
Lillie  and  Morgan  concerning  minimal  size  as  untenable.  Weisz 
(1948a)  found  successful  regeneration  in  pieces  of  coeruleus  as 
small  as  70 /x  in  diameter;  yet  he  reported  and  later  emphasized 
(Weisz,  1953,  1954)  that  even  much  larger  fragments  could  be 
produced  which  are  incapable  of  regeneration.  The  crucial  point, 
he  thought,  was  w^hether  or  not  a  fragment  contains  a  portion  of 
the  normal  primordium  site  and  hence  presumably  specialized 
kinetosomes  which  alone  can  produce  an  oral  primordium.  Yet 
this  explanation  is  contradicted  not  only  by  Causin's  (1931) 
demonstration  of  the  dispensability  of  the  primordium  site  but  also 
by  Weisz's  own  experiments,  mentioned  above,  showing  that 
regeneration  can  occur  in  aboral  halves,  though  much  delayed. 
And  I  have  found  (Tartar,  1958b)  that  nucleated  primordium 
sectors,  or  just  the  part  of  the  stentor  cell  which  contains  the 
primordium  site,  can  regenerate  completely,  with  mouthparts, 
only  if  of  sufficient  size. 

When  a  sample  of  coeruleus  is  set  aside  for  a  week  or  two  without 
added  nutrients  the  animals  starve  until  individuals  are  produced 
which  are  much  smaller  than  normal  daughter  cells.  Starting  with 
these  starvation  dw^arfs,  I  cut  off  substantial  portions  of  the  posterior 
pole  and  found  that  pieces  as  small  as  75  ft  in  diameter  or  only 
I /123rd  the  volume  of  large,  pre-starvation  stentors,  could  re- 
generate completely  and  survive  for  over  6  days  (Fig.  29).  Although 
these  tiny  stentors  had  much  fewer  than  the  usual  number  of 
membranelles,  the  width  and  length  of  these  organelles  when 
measured  proved  to  be  very  nearly  the  same  as  in  large  animals, 
and  these  relatively  oversized  organelles  caused  the  anterior  end  of 
the  tiny  animals  to  shake  and  shudder  with  their  beating. 

Therefore  it  seems  to  me,  as  previously  suggested  (Tartar, 
1941b),  that  a  Hmit  to  reconstitution  of  the  normal  form  is  imposed 
simply  by  the  fact  that  the  units  of  ectoplasmic  structure  are  each 
of  a  nearly  constant  size  or  incapable  of ''  miniaturization  ",  so  that 
with  decreasing  volume  there  will  come  a  point  beyond  which 
the  formation  of  anything  like  a  normal  set  of  feeding  organelles 

°/  \^ 

|uj  I   LIBRARY    1>:| 


122 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


is  impossible  with  such  units.  Failure  of  smallest  pieces  to  re- 
generate would  then  be  due  neither  to  pathological  changes  nor 
to  insufficiency  of  material  but  rather  to  structural  incompatibility 
between  the  size  of  the  parts  and  what  is  to  be  made  from  them. 
Tiny  fragments  can  produce  some  oral  cilia  and  membranelles  but 
it  may  well  be  that  there  is  a  jamming  when  these  parts  attempt  to 
coil  tightly  inward  to  produce  a  gullet. 


Fig.  29.  Regenerated  *S.  coeruleiis  of  near  minimum  size,  a: 
Tiny  and  large  stentors  drawn  to  same  scale.  Note  that  mem- 
branelles are  of  same  width  and  length  in  both.  Pigment  stripes 
are  also  of  similar  widths,  hence  minute  form  had  only  about  20 
as  compared  with  100  for  the  large  animal,  b:  Enlarged  view 
of  regenerant,  which  has  but  one  macronuclear  node  and  very 
few  stripes  in  the  frontal  field. 


If  units  of  ectoplasmic  structure  in  ciliates,  such  as  oral  cilia, 
body  cilia,  and  trichocysts,  are  of  a  standard,  nearly  invariant  size 
for  any  species  of  ciliate  (cf.  Bonner,  1954;  Ehret  and  Powers, 
1959)  this  should  simplify  the  problems  of  growth;  for  one  would 
then  need  only  to  explain  their  increase  in  number,  and  further 
hypothesis  regarding  their  adaptive  size  would  not  be  necessary. 
This  seems  to  be  one  of  the  crucial  theoretical  points  involved  in 
these  small-fragment  studies.  The  other  resides  in  the  amazing 
fact  that  organic  form  is  largely  independent  of  size  and,  outside 
the  limitation  just  mentioned,  it  is  possible  for  stentor  shapes  and 


REGENERATION  123 

feeding  organelles  to  be  produced  in  an  enormously  wide  range  of 
sizes.  It  seems  that  nature  herself  has  already  explored  these 
possibilities,  for  the  tiny,  blue-green  Stentor  tmdtiformis  appears 
in  almost  every  respect  like  the  tiniest  regenerate  of  coeruleus. 


6.  Adjustments  to  proportionality  of  parts 

Tiny  fragments  form  primordia  which  are  very  short  though 
apparently  of  normal  width  and  therefore  regenerate  a  set  of  feeding 
organelles  proportionate  to  their  size  except  that  the  individual 
membranelles  are  relatively  large.  In  the  other  extreme,  Balbiani 
(1891b)  noticed  abnormally  large  mouthparts  in  some  of  his 
double  monsters  and  I,  too,  have  occasionally  seen  the  same,  as 
well  as  very  large  frontal  fields  and  unusually  long  membranellar 
bands  in  the  products  of  stentor  grafting.  Hence  the  normal  upper 
limit  in  size  of  these  organelles  can  also  be  exceeded. 

When  regeneration  is  induced  by  excising  the  mouthparts  only, 
the  new  membranellar  band  joins  with  the  old  one.  Therefore  one 
might  expect  that  when  the  entire  head  is  removed  the  regenerated 
membranellar  band  would  be  smaller ;  but  in  this  case  the  primor- 


FiG.  30.   Proportionality  of  parts  in  S.  coeruleus. 

Anterior  half  of  transected  stentor  is  at  first  too  short  and  with 
too-large  head.  Membranellar  band  and  frontal  field  are  then 
reduced  to  half  original  size  without  primordium  formation,  as 
the  cell  extends  and  a  new  tail-pole  and  holdfast  are  formed. 
Posterior  half  is  at  first  too  long,  then  regenerates  a  smaller  set  of 
feeding  organelles,  as  the  posterior  pole  is  proportionately 
reduced.    (After,  Morgan,  1901a.) 


124  '^"^    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

dium  grows  to  a  greater  length,  extending  far  forward,  and  so  the 
size  of  the  regenerated  feeding  organelles  is  the  same  and 
proportionate. 

Of  special  interest  is  the  finding  of  Morgan  (1901b)  that  frag- 
ments whose  parts  are  rendered  disproportionate  by  the  cutting 
do  not  wait,  as  conceivably  they  might,  for  gradual  differential 
growth  to  right  the  imbalance  but  adjust  to  proportionality 
relatively  soon.  Morgan  cut  unfed  coeruleus  in  two  transversely  and 
observed  in  the  anterior  fragments  that  the  stalk  which  was  at  first 
too  short  then  gradually  lengthened,  while  the  original  membran- 
ellar  band,  initially  too  large,  became  reduced  to  half  its  starting 
size  without  formation  of  a  new  one,  and  proportionality  of  parts 
was  regained  (Fig.  30).  In  posterior  fragments  the  stalk  was  at 
first  too  long,  but  it  gradually  came  to  assume  normal  proportions 
and  the  regenerated  feeding  organelles  were  of  course  of  smaller 
and  proper  size.  Reviewing  his  own  studies,  Morgan  (1901b)  then 
added  the  statement  that  the  regenerated  organelles  on  the 
posterior  fragment  are  in  fact  too  small  and  that  they  "later 
become  larger  until  the  characteristic  form  is  reached".  This 
would  imply  an  improbable  growth  in  situ,  a  question  which  will 
be  dealt  with  shortly. 

Prowazek  (1904)  said  that  he  confirmed  Morgan's  original 
findings  and  noted  that  they  imply,  with  reference  to  the  anterior 
fragment,  that  there  should  be  an  imperceptible  resorption  of 
portions  of  the  old  membranellar  band  to  make  it  proportionate 
in  size.  Such  adjustment  he  thought  was  exhibited  in  a  dramatic 
way  in  the  case  of  a  stentor  which  divided  unequally,  producing 
a  smaller  than  normal  proter  which  carried  the  now  much  too 
large  original  ingestive  structure.  The  feeding  organelles  then 
gradually  regressed  until  they  appeared  to  be  completely  resorbed 
while  a  new  primordium  was  forming  to  produce  a  head  of  proper 
proportions.  Yet  this  behavior  may  be  regarded  as  anomalous 
because  it  does  not  occur  even  in  the  most  abbreviated  anterior 
fragments  in  which  there  is  more  occasion  for  it. 

Even  in  normal  division  the  original  head,  which  is  passed  on  to 
the  anterior  daughter,  is  at  first  too  large  but  on  separation  both  the 
proter  and  the  opisthe  seem  to  have  feeding  organelles  which  are 
equal  in  size  and  proportionate.  According  to  Weisz  (1951b), 
adjustment  occurs  in  the  presumptive  proter  during  the  last  stages 


REGENERATION  I25 

of  division,  whereby  the  original  feeding  organelles  are  reduced  in 
size.  The  partial  regression  of  the  mouthparts  at  this  time,  in 
which  disappearance  of  the  oral  pouch  as  such  is  particularly 
conspicuous,  may  represent  the  initial  steps  toward  a  remodeling 
of  the  mouthparts  on  a  smaller  scale,  but  further  changes  are  not 
easily  followed. 

We  do  not  yet  understand  what  determines  the  size  or  scale  of 
mouthparts  formed  anew.  Experiments  here  are  contradictory. 
When  a  stage-3  regenerator  was  cut  in  two  transversely  through 
the  primordium  and  the  anterior  half  rotated  180°  on  the  posterior 
the  short  anterior  half  anlage  produced  a  tiny  mouth  while  the 
posterior  section  of  equal  length  was  completely  employed  in 
forming  a  large  one  (Fig.  31  a).  If  the  two  fragments  were  entirely 
separated,  however,  each  portion  of  the  primordium  produced  a 
small  and  proportionate  gullet  and  oral  pouch  in  addition  to  the 
membranellar  band  (b).  An  odd  case,  in  which  the  regeneration 
primordium  was  unusually  short,  produced  a  tiny  set  of  mouth- 
parts in  a  large  stentor  (c) ;  but  when  a  nucleated  primordium  sector 
was  isolated  from  a  stage-4  regenerator  the  mouthparts  were  still 
proportionate  to  the  fragment  although  the  anlage  was  of  normal 
length  (d).  When  tail-poles  were  grafted  into  the  frontal  field  and 
reorganization  followed,  the  mouthparts  produced  on  the  graft 
were  proportionate  to  its  size,  as  were  those  on  the  host  (e).  Hence 
in  some  cases  the  length  of  the  primordium  and  in  others  the  size 
of  the  cell  seemed  to  determine  the  scale  of  the  parts  produced. 

The  most  exaggerated  requirement  for  an  adjustment  of  cortical 
organelles  is  occasioned  by  producing  fragments  which  consist  of 
the  head  only  (Tartar,  i959d).  By  circumscribing  the  membran- 
ellar band  and  cutting  carefully  around  the  oral  pouch  and  gullet 
so  as  not  to  disturb  them,  fragments  were  cut  which  contained 
only  the  feeding  organelles  intact,  the  frontal  field,  a  little  endo- 
plasm,  and  usually  one  or  two  of  the  most  anterior  macronuclear 
nodes.  Much  shorter  than  the  anterior  fragments  cut  by  Morgan, 
these  pieces  folded  on  themselves  in  healing  to  produce  spheres  in 
which  the  membranellar  band  was  thrown  into  coils  like  the 
stitching  on  a  baseball  (Figs.  32  and  86c).  In  these  specimens  there 
was  no  primordium  formation,  but  the  membranellar  band  soon 
decreased  in  length  as  it  became  normally  disposed  and  the 
mouthparts  were  later  gradually  reduced  in  size,   while  ecto- 


126 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Fig.  31.   Observations  relating  to  proportionality  of  mouthparts 
in  S.  coeruleus. 

A.  Regenerator  in  stage  3  is  transected  and  the  halves  rotated 
on  each  other.  Both  sections  of  the  as  yet  undetermined  pri- 
mordium  produce  mouthparts.  Those  from  the  anterior  part 
are  very  small;  posterior  anlage  almost  entirely  used  to  form  a 

very  large  set  of  mouthparts.    Yet  — 

B.  If  the  halves  of  such  a  specimen  are  separated,  equal, 
proportionate     and    medium-sized     oral     differentiations     are 

produced. 

C.  From  deletions  to  the  primordium  site  a  very  short 
regeneration  anlage  was  produced,  forming  much  too  small  a 

set  of  mouthparts  for  the  size  of  the  animal. 


REGENERATION  127 

plasmic  striping  grew  out  and  the  normal  form  and  proportions 
of  a  stentor  were  reconstituted  on  a  small  scale.  But  nothing  of 
this  happened  if  no  nuclear  beads  were  included  and  the  fragment 
then  remained  until  death  about  four  days  later  just  as  it  was  after 
cutting  and  healing.  It  would  therefore  seem  that  the  nucleus  is 
essential  in  both  the  formation  and  the  dedifferentiation  of  oral 
structures.  These  cases  demonstrate  how  capable  is  Stentor  in 
adjusting  its  parts  to  normal  proportions. 


Fig.  32.  Adjustment  of  size  of  parts  in  nucleated,  isolated  head 
of  S.  coeruleus.  Feeding  organelles  and  frontal  field  are  excised 
without  injury  but  with  minimum  lateral  ectoplasm.  In  folding 
to  cover  the  wound  the  fragment  becomes  much  contorted. 
Membranellar  band  decreases  in  length  and  lateral  striping 
gradually  grows  out  to  form  a  tail-pole.  Later  the  mouthparts 
are  also  decreased  in  proportion.  Adjustment  occurs  without 
primordium  formation  but  only  if  nucleus  is  present. 

7.  Can  mouthparts  and  membranelles  be  formed  in  situ  ? 

In  the  normal  course  of  life  new  feeding  organelles  in  Stentor 
are  formed  only  through  the  development  of  an  oral  primordium ; 
yet  there  are  hints  in  the  literature  that  this  may  not  be  the  only 
pathway  to  oral  differentiation,  although  no  really  convincing 
demonstrations  have  been  offered.  In  respect  to  the  mouthparts, 

D.  Primordium  sector  isolated  from  a  stage-4  regenerator. 
Development  continues  and  size  of  mouthparts  is  proportionate 
not  to  the  original  cell  or  the  length  of  the  anlage  but  to  the  size 

of  the  fragment. 

E.  Tail  pole  was  grafted  to  frontal  field  of  a  stage-2  regenera- 
tor. First  sketch  shows  an  additional  anlage  now  induced  in  the 
graft.     On    developing,    the    primordia    produced    mouthparts 

proportionate  to  the  size  of  the  part  in  which  they  arose. 


128 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Morgan  commented  that  if  a  portion  is  removed  the  remaining 
parts  seemed  to  reconstitute  the  normal  ingestive  structure,  though 
this  was  generally  replaced  later  by  a  new  one.  In  my  experience 
an  isolated  gullet  can  attain  a  neat  opening  on  the  surface  and 
attaches  to  the  correct  end  of  a  remnant  of  the  membranellar  band, 
while  the  severed  oral  pouch  with  its  membranellar  border  also 
does  not  remain  as  cut  but  coils  sharply  to  form  a  pigmented 
depression  with  the  shape  of  the  inside  of  an  abalone  (Fig.  33A). 


Fig,  33.    Relating  to  reconstitution  and  formation  in  situ  of 
mouthparts. 

A.  Gullet  severed  inside  of  stentor,  isolated  oral  pouch  widely 
displaced,  gullet  opening  destroyed  by  anterior  incision.    Gullet 
finds  neat  opening  to  exterior  and  joins  adoral  end  of  adjacent 
membranellar  band,  while  oral  pouch  coils  sharply  as  if  attempt- 
ing mouth  formation.    Regeneration  follows. 

B.  Two  types  of  gross  oral  injury  which  are  followed  by 
mending  without  regeneration:  sectioning  mouthparts  but 
leaving  them  close  together,  and  thrusting  an  eyelash  into  the 

gullet  and  out  through  opposite  side  of  the  cell. 

C.  Before   regeneration,    adoral   end   of   the    membranellar 
band  may  produce  a  small  pit,  or  a  tight  coiling  (D). 


REGENERATION  I29 

Yet  neither  part  reconstitutes  a  complete  mouth,  even  if  either  one 
is  completely  removed.  If  the  gullet  is  severed  from  the  oral  pouch 
and  the  structures  are  left  adjacent,  or  if  the  mouthparts  are  severely 
injured  in  place,  in  the  vast  majority  of  cases  the  parts  will  rejoin 
and  perfect  mouthparts  be  reconstituted  without  the  formation 
of  a  regeneration  primordium.  That  some  remodeling  can  occur 
in  situ  was  indicated  by  the  fact  that  in  one  case  an  unusually  long 
and  wide  gullet  was  produced.  In  another  case  an  eyelash  was 
thrust  down  the  gullet  and  out  the  side  of  the  cell  yet  no  regenera- 
tion followed  and  the  stentor  was  later  capable  of  forming  food 
vacuoles  (Fig.  33B). 

Morgan  also  noted  that  some  of  his  aboral,  anterior  fragments 
formed  a  small  oral  pit  at  the  proximal  end  of  the  membranellar 
band  remaining  (Fig.  33c),  and  a  similar  effort  toward  oral  re- 
generation was  also  observed  by  Causin  (193 1).  I  have  observed 
these  formations  too,  as  well  as  the  tendency  for  the  cut,  proximal 
end  of  the  membranellar  band  to  form  at  least  a  tight  little  coil  (d). 
I  further  reported  (Tartar,  1956a)  a  case  in  which  good  mouthparts 
were  apparently  reconstituted  from  the  buccal  pouch  alone,  as 
well  as  the  formation  at  least  of  an  apparently  complete  gullet 
instead  of  merely  a  pit  at  the  end  of  an  adoral  band  (Tartar,  1956b). 
One  may  at  least  conclude  that  the  mouthparts  are  quite  capable 
of  repairing  themselves. 

This  may  also  be  said  for  the  membranellar  band.  If  the  band 
is  cut  in  two  or  small  sections  of  it  removed,  the  parts  simply  heal 
together  and  no  regeneration  ensues.  Whether  some  compensatory 
growth  of  membranelles  occurs  if  some  are  excised  has  not  been 
precisely  determined.  Stevens  (1903)  found  in  oral  longitudinal 
halves  "some  evidence"  that  the  abbreviated  membranellar  band 
increased  in  length.  But  the  formation  of  regeneration  primordia 
in  stentors  from  which  half  the  band  has  been  excised  speaks 
against  the  formation  of  membranelles  in  situ.  Were  this  possible, 
such  regeneration  would  then  not  be  necessar}^ 

In  Prowazek's  important  if  miscellaneous  paper  of  1904,  he  first 
reported  that  the  membranellar  band  in  coeruleus  is  shed  when  the 
ciliates  are  subjected  to  a  weak  solution  of  table  salt.  Then  he  noted 
that  after  24  hours  a  new  membranellar  band  was  regenerated  in  the 
same  place  (an  derselben  Stelle).  This  is  all  he  says.  The  point  is 
not  developed  further,  nor  was  this  remark  italicized,  as  was  his 


130  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

habit  in  emphasizing  major  issues  in  the  remainder  of  the  paper. 
Hence  it  seems  to  me  that  all  later  commentators  have  mis- 
interpreted this  passage  as  a  statement  that  membranelle  formation 
can  occur  in  place  or  without  primordium  formation.  But  this  is 
not  to  exclude  that  such  development  may  occur  after  a  fashion, 
anomalous  as  this  w^ould  be.  Schw^artz  repeated  Prowazek's  salt- 
shedding  experiments  and  stated  that  in  some  cases  there  W2is 
clearly  a  neo-formation  of  membranelles  in  situ.  His  explanation 
was  that  only  the  cilia  of  the  membranelles  had  been  cast  off, 
leaving  the  basal  bodies  intact,  from  which  new  cilia  may  have 
grown ;  and  he  remarked  that  if  this  can  occur,  such  replacement, 
rather  than  primordium  formation,  should  be  the  method  of 
renewing  supposedly  worn-out  feeding  organelles.  I  have  myself 
noticed  a  few  similar  cases.  In  one  of  these,  a  stage-3  divider  was 
treated  with  sucrose  and  it  shed  the  membranellar  band.  The 
division  primordium  remained  but  showed  abortive  development, 
while  around  the  anterior  rim  of  the  cell  there  appeared  within 
about  4  hours  shorter  than  normal  oral  cilia  which  beat  in  meta- 
chronal  rhythm.  Such  cases  indicate  that  if  carefully  graded  treat- 
ments were  employed,  a  renewal  of  the  large  oral  cilia  if  not  the 
entire  membranelle  might  be  firmly  established.  Yet  it  is  certain 
that  in  most  experiments  of  this  sort  the  entire  band  comes  off  and 
the  regeneration  primordium  is  soon  formed  (see  p.  252). 

8.  Repeated  oral  regeneration 

Since  the  formation  and  development  of  an  oral  primordium 
involves  the  production  of  thousands  of  new,  large,  oral  cilia  as 
well  as  other  parts,  one  wonders  whether  there  is  an  inexhaustible 
reserve  for  such  synthesis.  Gruber  (1885b)  cut  and  presumably 
decapitated  a  coeruleus  on  5  successive  days  and  each  time 
complete  regeneration  followed  until  the  animal  finally  became 
necrotic  and  too  small  for  further  operation.  With  the  same  large 
species,  Prowazek  (1904)  also  performed  successive  cuttings.  In 
one  tabulated  case  an  animal  was  cut  nine  times  during  which 
macronuclear  beads  were  not  removed,  and  this  animal  always 
regenerated.  The  material  of  the  macronucleus  seemed  to  have 
been  substantially  drawn  upon,  because  it  was  finally  reduced 
from  II  to  only  2  nodes.  He  also  reported  3  cases  in  which  the 
animal  was  repeatedly  cut  or  wounded  and  compelled  to  re- 


REGENERATION  131 

generate  and  that  these  then  became  able  to  regenerate  without 
the  nucleus.  This  surprising  result  was  explained  in  terms  of  the 
then-popular  chromidial  hypothesis,  whereby  a  nucleus  can  be 
stimulated  to  extrude  chromidia,  which  can  then  substitute  for  it 
(see  p.  299). 

Hartmann  (1922)  posed  the  question  of  whether  division  could 
be  indefinitely  postponed  by  repeated  cutting  ablations  on  a 
feeding  cell.  That  this  is  the  case,  he  demonstrated  for  Amoeba 
and  the  fresh  water  worm  Stenostomum,  as  well  as  for  Stentor 
coeruleus.  Stentors  were  fed  on  Colpidium  and  allowed  to  grow  but 
were  cut  before  they  attained  division  size.  Hartmann  noted  that 
a  cut  could  produce  either  oral  or  headless  remainders  and, 
although  his  account  is  not  clear  in  this  regard,  I  assume  from  his 
statement  that  regeneration  occurred  and  that  this  was  oral 
regeneration  and  not  merely  holdfast  renewal  or  recovery  of  normal 
shape.  In  one  tabulated  case  a  stentor  regenerated  25  successive 
times  during  52  days,  without  fission,  while  the  controls  divided 
35  times.  These  results  indicated,  that  if  there  is  an  accumulation 
of  some  factor  disposing  the  cell  to  fission,  this  factor  is  reduced  by 
excisions ;  as  well  as  that  indefinitely  repeated  regeneration  seems 
to  be  possible  within  one  individual  if  fed,  and  that  frequent  fission 
is  not  essential  to  survival. 

9.  Blockage  of  regeneration 

Although  stentors  regenerate  with  the  greatest  regularity  and 
can  even  re-regenerate  repeatedly  or  exhibit  a  succession  of  re- 
organizations in  starved  fusion  complexes,  I  have  encountered  a 
half-dozen  cases  among  thousands  in  which,  for  some  un- 
accountable reason,  otherwise  healthy  appearing  coeruleus  failed 
to  regenerate  the  feeding  organelles  though  surviving  for  many 
days.  A  similar  number  of  instances  were  found  among  starving 
animals,  which  is  enough  to  give  the  impression  that  stentors 
cannot  form  regeneration  primordia  without  carbohydrate  reserves 
as  Weisz  (1948b)  asserted.  Yet  a  direct  pursuit  of  this  question 
showed  that  even  the  most  pellucid  animals  without  food  vacuoles 
or  demonstrable  glycogenoid  granules  were  still  quite  able  to 
regenerate  (Tartar,  1959a).  On  the  other  hand,  it  is  common 
enough  to  find  that  necrotic  stentors  or  animals  which  have  an 
apparently  decreased  vitality  from  being  long  isolated  on  slides 


132  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

are  unable  to  consummate  regeneration.  Improper  healing  of  cut 
animals  is  supposed  to  offer  a  blockage  to  regeneration  according 
to  Sokoloff  (1924)  and  Weisz  (1948a) ;  but  my  experience  is  that  the 
healing  capacity  of  stentors  is  sufficient  for  neat  repair  after  any 
cutting  operation  except  an  extreme  reduction  in  the  ectoplasm 
which  alone  prevents  apposition  of  cut  surfaces. 

Nevertheless  regeneration  can  be  blocked  in  Stentor  by  treat- 
ment with  certain  chemical  agents.  Weisz  (1955)  tested  the  effects 
on  regeneration  of  over  20  compounds,  including  substituted 
purines  and  pyrimidines  and  a  variety  of  anti-metabolites.  The 
most  effective,  in  the  sense  of  producing  reversible  blockages 
without  toxicity,  was  acriflavin,  a  mixture  of  2,8-diamino-io- 
methyl-acridinium  chloride  and  2,8-diamino-acridine.  These 
compounds  or  their  allies  are  bacteriostatic,  and  some  of  their 
effects  on  ciliates  had  already  been  explored  (Robertson,  1925). 
Weisz  reported  that  acriflavin  has  a  graded  sequence  of  effects  on 
coeruletis,  depending  on  concentration  and  duration  of  exposure. 
First  there  was  some  paralysis  of  ciliary  beating  and  cell  contrac- 
tion, followed  by  more  or  less  complete  shedding  of  the  peUicle. 
Oral  primordium  formation  might  then  be  merely  delayed,  or  pre- 
vented entirely,  the  animals  then  dying.  When  primordium  forma- 
tion occurred  there  were  graded  effects  in  the  completeness  of  the 
development  of  the  anlage.  The  primordium  might  appear  briefly 
and  then  be  resorbed  without  any  attempt  at  re-regeneration.  Oral 
formation  might  be  arrested  at  stage  4,  producing  a  membranellar 
band  which  developed  no  further.  Sometimes  the  band  could 
assume  the  normal  curvature  but  failed  to  coil  inward  and  develop 
the  gullet  and  associated  mouthparts.  These  inhibitive  effects 
could  be  reversed  or  counteracted  by  other  agents:  adenine, 
guanine,  thymine,  uracil,  folic  acid,  RNA,  and  DNA,  the  two 
latter,  presumably  the  commercial  product  from  yeast,  being  the 
most  effective.  Interpreting  these  findings,  Weisz  postulated  that 
development  of  the  oral  primordium  is  a  series  of  separate  morpho- 
genetic  events  interconnected  by  acriflavin-sensitive  transition 
reactions.  Kinetosomes  might  be  affected  in  several  of  their 
functions,  first  in  the  promotion  of  ciliary  beating,  then  in  their 
synthesis  of  new  cilia,  and  finally  in  some  morphogenetic  activity 
by  which  membranelles  and  other  complex  organelles  are  pro- 
duced. Application  of  compounds  which  reversed  the  effect  of 


REGENERATION  133 

acriflavin  had  the  same  effect  whether  administered  before  or 
during  the  acriflavin  treatment,  and  hence  it  appeared  that  inhi- 
bition by  acriflavin  is  non-competitive.  He  could  not  say  whether 
the  effect  is  physical  or  chemical. 

This  inviting  biochemical  approach  to  cell  differentiation  as 
expressed  in  oral  primordium  formation  in  Stentor  is  being  pursued 
further  by  A.  H.  Whiteley.  He  is  finding  (unpublished)  that  both 
the  purine  analogue,  8-azaquanine — which  gave  no  effect  for 
Weisz — and  the  pyrimidine  analogue,  2-thiocytosine,  completely 
block  anlagen  formation  in  coeruleus.  The  inhibition  is  reversible, 
and  regeneration  of  animals  returned  to  lake  water  indicates  that 
this  result  is  probably  not  due  to  toxicity  but  to  interference  with 
the  formation  of  nucleic  acids  which  incorporate  purines  and 
pyrimidines.  Moreover,  in  the  case  of  8-azaquanine  the  effect  is 
counteracted  by  the  presence  of  normal  components  of  nucleic 
acids,  i.e.,  hydrolyzed  yeast  RNA  or  by  RNA  directly.  And  the 
impHcation  of  RNA  in  primordium  formation  is  further  indicated 
by  Whiteley's  finding  that  a  certain  concentration  of  the  RNA- 
destroying  enzyme,  ribonuclease,  can  also  block  regeneration. 
The  abolition  of  this  effect  by  added  RNAimpKes  that  the  RNAase 
was  in  fact  producing  this  blockage  through  destruction  of 
ribonucleic  acids. 

Similarly,  but  at  a  wider  range  of  concentrations,  5-methyl- 
tyrosine  prevented  regeneration  without  appreciable  toxic  side- 
effects.  Since  this  compound  is  an  antimetabolic  analogue  of 
adenosine  found  in  most  proteins,  the  result,  in  this  case  was 
probably  due  to  the  blockage  of  protein  synthesis.  Therefore  it 
appears  that  primordium  formation  in  which  thousands  of  new 
cilia  are  produced  does  involve  extensive  protein  synthesis  and 
not  merely  the  translocation  of  proteins  already  formed,  as  well 
as  that  RNA  is  equally  implicated,  in  accordance  with  the  hypo- 
thesis that  RNA  guides  protein  synthesis  (Brachet,  1957). 

A  satisfactory  elucidation  of  the  intimate  material  basis  of  the 
elaboration  of  cell  differentiations  is  rendered  promising  in  regard 
to  Stentor  by  the  fact  that  several  treatments  inhibit  oral  anlagen 
formation,  presumably  by  affecting  separate,  essential  aspects  of  a 
complex  process.  Even  simple  salts  in  very  dilute  solution  also 
delay  or  prevent  regeneration  or  inhibit  primordium  develop- 
ment (see  p.  254).   Moreover,   regeneration  may  be  blocked  by 


134  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

morphological  disarrangements  without  chemical  additives,  as 
when  reversing  the  single  primordium  site  often  if  not  always 
precludes  the  formation  of  an  anlage  (p.  197). 

Oral  regeneration  is  thus  often  the  preferred  phenomenon  for 
study  because  by  oral  ablations  we  can  induce  at  will  the  bio- 
chemical and  epigenetic  processes  involved  in  primordium  forma- 
tion. But  there  is  no  reason  to  suppose  that  the  fundamental 
features  of  anlagen  development  in  regeneration  are  different  from 
those  in  the  more  autonomous  performances  of  division  and  re- 
organization. Instead,  it  is  perhaps  reasonable  to  suppose  that 
from  the  means  providing  for  the  basic  requirement  for  reproduc- 
tion by  division  were  developed  the  capacities  for  reorganization 
and  regeneration  which  seem  far  less  significant  for  survival  of 
the  species. 


CHAPTER    VIII 

ACTIVATION   AND    INHIBITION   OF 
THE   ORAL   PRIMORDIUM 

When  a  stentor  which  is  in  the  process  of  developing  an  oral 
primordium  is  intimately  grafted  to  a  normally  feeding  partner 
not  producing  a  new  set  of  feeding  organelles,  both  animals  no 
longer  continue  on  their  original  ways  but  now  act  upon  each 
other  with  significant  and  visible  consequences.  These  inter- 
actions were  first  explored  in  fusions  of  regenerating  to  non- 
diiferentiating  stentors.  Regenerators  often  caused  the  partner  to 
produce  a  primordium  and  undergo  parallel  reorganization.  This 
type  of  interaction  may  be  called  induced  reorganization  as 
formulated  by  Weisz  (1956).  Alternatively,  the  influence  may 
proceed  in  the  other  direction,  suspending  the  regeneration  and 
causing  the  regenerator  to  resorb  its  anlage.  This  reaction  may  be 
referred  to  as  induced  resorption  of  the  primordium  (Tartar, 
1958b).  Another  way  of  exhibiting  these  interactions  is  to  graft 
cell  sectors  bearing  primordia  on  to  various  hosts.  When  grafted 
to  stentors  which  are  themselves  undergoing  regeneration,  the 
extra  primordia  are  accepted,  supported,  and  continue  developing; 
but  if  implanted  on  to  non-diflFerentiating  stentors  primordia  are 
resorbed  though  the  patch  itself  is  incorporated  into  the  lateral 
striping  of  the  host. 

The  range  and  basis  of  these  reciprocal  influences  have  been 
quite  extensively  explored  (Tartar,  1958b,  1958c).  The  results  can 
be  explained  in  terms  of  two  contrasting  cell  states:  activation,  in 
which  something  of  the  whole  cytoplasm  is  involved  in  supporting 
primordium  formation  and  development,  and  inhibition,  which  is 
equally  pervasive  and  tends  to  block  or  counteract  the  processes  of 
cell  redifferentiation.  Either  of  these  states  is  sufficiently  potent 
to  spread  from  one  cell  to  another  with  which  it  is  intimately 
joined,  in  the  one  case  to  force  a  precipitous  primordium  formation, 
and  in  the  other,  to  cause  the  complete  resorption  of  an  anlage 
which  is  already  well  begun. 

K 

135 


136  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

I.  The  course  and  spectrum  of  cell  interactions 

Enlarging  upon  these  statements,  we  shall  at  first  and  for  the 
most  part  confine  our  account  to  regenerators  and  their  parts 
interacting  with  non-differentiating  stentors  (Tartar,  1958b). 
When  a  sector  bearing  the  primordium  and  a  few  macronuclear 
nodes  is  cut  out  of  a  regenerator,  development  of  the  anlage  con- 
tinues as  the  fragment  regenerates  a  small  stentor;  or  when  the 
sector  is  grafted  into  the  back  of  another  regenerator,  both  host 
and  donor  primordia  continue  differentiating  and  produce  a 
doublet  or  bistomial  stentor.  These  tests  show  that  such  sectors 
contain  all  that  is  necessary  for  anlagen  development  and  that  the 
grafting  operation  itself  has  no  effect  on  this  process.  But  if  a 


B 


Fig.  34.  A.  Induced  primordium  resorption.  Sector  of  a  stage-3 
regenerator  grafted  to  a  non-differentiating  host  (a),    b:  Anlage 
is    promptly    resorbed,    but    not   the    multiplied    fine    striping 
encompassed    by    it.     c:    Specimen    undergoes    regeneration- 
reorganization  because  added  primordium  site  does  not  subtend 
mouthparts,  and  a  doublet  is  formed  (d). 
B.     Accelerated   reformation   of  primordium   after  excision. 
a:   Primordium   and   site   removed,     b:   Rift   soon   appears   in 
previously  closed  line  of  heal,    c:  Primordium  appears  in  rift 
within  an  hour  after  operation  and  there  is  no  multiplication  of 
adjacent  lateral  stripes,  d:  Only  relatively  few  and  broad  stripes 
are  hence  carried  into  the  frontal  field. 


ACTIVATION    AND    INHIBITION:    ORAL    PRIMORDIUM    137 

sector  bearing  a  mid-stage  primordium  is  grafted  onto  a  non- 
differentiating  stentor  (without  primordium  and  not  in  process  of 
regenerating,  reorganizing,  or  dividing),  the  primordium  is 
promptly  taken  down  and  resorbed — not  sloughed.  Notice  in 
Fig.  34A  that  the  patch  itself  is  not  resorbed,  nor  are  the  newly 
multiplied  fine  striping  to  the  right  of  the  primordium  site; 
instead,  the  sector  becomes  part  of  the  lateral  striping  of  the  host. 

This  experiment  shows  that  something  besides  cytoplasm  and 
macronucleus  is  necessary  for  regeneration.  The  cell  must  also  be 
in  a  state  of  activation.  The  nuclei  of  the  non-differentiating  host 
could  have  been  replaced  by  others  from  an  actively  regenerating 
stentor  and  primordium  resorption  would  still  have  taken  place; 
likewise  if  the  host's  primordium  site  had  been  replaced  with  the 
grafted  sector.  Therefore  the  state  of  inhibition  (or  its  opposite, 
activation)  seems  to  characterize  the  cytoplasm;  and  not  merely 
the  part  adjacent  to  anlage  formation,  but  every  part  of  the  cyto- 
plasm. For  it  is  clear  that  an  inhibiting  influence  was  spreading 
from  the  host,  across  the  grafted  patch,  to  the  primordium, 
resulting  in  its  dissolution.  There  are  indications,  though  not  yet 
conclusive,  that  the  endoplasm  as  well  as  the  macronucleus  is 
indifferent,  with  cell  states  characterizing  the  cortex  alone. 

A  reciprocal  influence  appears  to  occur  in  the  later  history  of 
this  type  of  case;  for  now  the  grafted  primordium  site,  lacking 
subtending  oral  structures,  is  incited  to  produce  a  regeneration 
primordium  and  brings  the  host  along  with  it  into  activation,  with 
the  result  that  combined  regeneration  and  reorganization  occur  to 
produce  a  doublet  stentor. 

Rapidity  and  success  of  induced  resorption  depends  upon  the 
stage  of  development  of  the  imposed  primordium.  Early  anlagen 
to  stage  3  can  be  completely  resorbed  within  about  2  to  4  hours. 
Stage-4  primordia  which  already  have  a  well  developed  membran- 
ellar  band  can  also  be  dissolved,  but  this  requires  many  hours 
during  which  the  anlagen  crumples  and  is  gradually  taken  down, 
though  complete  resorption  may  not  occur.  From  stage  5  onward, 
the  primordia  do  not  seem  to  be  resorbable  under  any  conditions, 
yet  they  do  not  remain  unaffected  when  grafted  to  non- 
differentiating  hosts.  Late  primordia  shrink  in  length  or  become 
compacted  and  convoluted  as  if  the  ectoplasm  were  not  co- 
operating in  their  deployment,  and  mouthparts  are  not  developed 


138  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

or  remain  incomplete.  Examples  of  this  abortive  development  will 
be  noted  later. 

A  state  of  inhibition  can  therefore  adversely  affect  primordium 
development  at  any  stage  until  final  oral  structures  are  formed, 
or  conversely,  a  state  of  activation  is  essential  during  all  this  time. 
The  initial  appearance  and  preparation  of  the  anlage  also  requires 
activation.  For  incipient  regenerators  at  what  may  be  called 
stage  O  will  not  even  begin  primordium  development  if  grafted 
to  inhibitive,  non-differentiating  partners.  The  inhibition  is  in 
fact  then  so  strong  that  the  regenerator  usually  does  not  begin 
regenerating  until  the  following  day. 

Returning  again  to  our  typical  experiment,  consider  now  what 
happens  to  the  regenerating  stentor  after  the  primordium  sector 
has  been  removed.  A  new  anlage  can  appear  within  one  hour, 
although  an  hour  and  a  half  is  closer  to  the  average  interval. 
This  precipitous  re-formation  of  the  anlage  is  most  simply  ex- 
plained on  the  basis  that  the  cell  was  already  activated. 

An  accelerated  renewal  of  the  anlage  of  a  quite  different  order 
of  magnitude  (6  vs.  9  hours)  was  noticed  by  Weisz  (1956)  in 
comparing  dividers,  which  had  resorbed  their  primordia  because 
of  injuries,  with  injured  pre-fissional  animals.  This  time  difference 
he  attributed  to  the  persistence  of  an  "  anarchic  field  "  or  multiplied 
store  of  new  kinetosomes  which  remain  ready  to  supply  materials 
for  the  new  primordium.  Yet,  when  an  anlage  is  resorbed  there 
is  no  rift  left  in  the  ectoplasm  to  indicate  that  kinetosomes  remain, 
and  one  would  expect  an  "embryonic"  anarchic  field  also  to  be 
resorbed  since  the  earlier  and  more  nascent  the  primordium  the 
more  easily  it  is  resorbed.  Moreover,  in  regenerators  in  which  a 
new  primordium  could  appear  within  the  surprisingly  short  time 
of  a  single  hour,  a  relatively  large  sector  bearing  the  anlage  was 
excised  so  that  any  anarchic  field  adjacent  to  the  primordium 
would  also  surely  have  been  removed.  For  in  the  related  Fahrea 
the  new  kinetosomes  lie  between  the  kineties  immediately  adjacent 
to  the  anlage  and  in  Stentor  they  seem  to  be  coincident  with  the 
primordium  itself  (Villeneuve-Brachon,  1940),  so  it  should  be 
impossible  to  cut  out  the  anlage  without  also  removing  its  progen- 
itors. I  therefore  cannot  agree  with  Weisz's  explanation,  nor  accept 
his  claim  to  have  effected  this  separation  of  primordium  and 
precursors  in  other  experiments.  The  long  preparatory  period  of 


ACTIVATION    AND    INHIBITION:    ORAL    PRIMORDIUM    I39 

about  four  hours  between  inducement  of  regeneration  and  first 
appearance  of  the  primordium  is  probably  occupied,  not  by 
developing  an  anarchic  field  or  other  assemblage  of  formed 
materials  for  the  anlage  but  in  transforming  the  cell  from  a  state 
of  inhibition  to  one  of  activation  (Tartar,  1958b). 

In  the  rapid  re-formation  of  anlagen  in  regenerators  minus 
primordium  sectors  the  primordia  themselves  are  normal  and  lead 
to  successful  regeneration,  but  their  manner  of  appearance  is  un- 
usual. As  shown  in  Fig.  34B,  the  line  of  heal  simply  reopens  and  an 
anlage  appears  in  the  rift.  Apparently  there  is  no  time  for  con- 
comitant stripe  multiplication  in  the  presumptive  frontal  field, 
and  the  primordium  simply  cuts  out  and  carries  forward  some  of 
the  relatively  wide  striping  on  its  right  side.  The  frontal  field  is 
correspondingly  abbreviated  and  reorganization  therefore  often 
follows. 

A  similar  appearance  is  also  found  in  induced  reorganization. 
If  a  stage-3  regenerator  is  grafted  to  a  smaller  non-diflFerentiation 
cell  the  latter  exerts  an  initial  influence  by  causing  the  arrest  or 
even  partial  regression  of  the  regenerator's  anlage,  though  later 
the  regenerator  is  dominant  and  induces  normal  primordium 
formation,  with  stripe  multipHcation,  in  the  partner  which  then 
reorganizes  simultaneously  (Fig.  3 5 a).  But  when  a  stage-4 
regenerator  is  used  no  transient  regression  of  the  original  anlage 
occurs,  and  the  induced  primordium  may  be  forced  to  appear  so 
rapidly  that  there  is  neither  stripe  multiplication  nor  normal 
growth  in  length  of  the  anlage  (b).  As  indicated  in  the  first  example, 
the  impression  is  unmistakable  that  in  mis-matched  grafts  there  is  a 
contest  and  conflict  between  primordium  activation  and  inhibition, 
the  flnal  outcome  of  which  is  only  decided  after  some  time. 
Figure  35c  illustrates  a  case  in  which  an  incipient  regenerator  was 
grafted  to  a  small  non-diflferentiating  partner:  a  regeneration 
primordium  soon  appeared  and  an  anlage  was  induced  in  the  other 
component,  then  regression  of  both  primordia  occurred,  after 
which  both  were  revived  and  regeneration-reorganization  went 
to  completion.  If  in  balance,  with  the  forces  of  inhibition  apparently 
equalling  those  of  activation,  neither  resorption  nor  development 
occurs ;  the  primordium  is  not  merely  arrested  but  seems  abortive 
as  it  takes  on  a  crumpled  appearance,  and  so  the  graft  complex 
remains  for  a  half-day  or  more  until  an  entirely  new  start  is  made 


140 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


(d).  Considering  this  case  as  a  mid-point,  the  range  of  interactions 
was  from  one  extreme  of  prompt  and  complete  primordium 
resorption  to  the  other,  or  precipitous  induction  of  anlagen 
formation. 

Where  the  final  result  will  lie  within  this  spectrum  depends 
upon  the  stage  of  the  original  primordium,  the  relative  volume  of 
the  two  cells,  and  the  intimacy  of  their  union.  As  we  shall  see  in 


A 


B 


C 


D 


Fig.  35.    Activation-inhibition  reactions  in  parabiotic  stentor 

grafts. 


ACTIVATION    AND    INHIBITION:    ORAL    PRIMORDIUM    141 

the  next  section,  the  stage  of  differentiation  of  the  anlage  is 
probably  significant  as  marking  the  waxing  and  waning  of  a  w^ave 
of  activation.  That  this  activation  or  the  reciprocal  state  of 
inhibition  characterizes  some  aspect  of  the  whole  cell  is  shown  by 
the  importance  of  the  relative  size  of  the  two  graft  components. 
A  large  regenerator  induces  reorganization  in  a  much  smaller  non- 
differentiating  partner,  if  the  latter  is  larger  it  forces  the  regenerator 
to  back  down  and  resorb  its  primordium.  If  the  two  cells  are  equal, 
anlage  resorption  also  occurs,  and  this  seems  to  indicate  that  the 
force  of  inhibition  is  stronger  than  that  of  activation.  However 
that  may  be,  the  two  forces  or  cell  states  are  seen  to  be  quantitative 
and  potentially  measurable. 

On  the  other  hand,  the  stimulus  which  starts  the  whole  course 
of  regeneration  is  stronger  than  the  forces  of  inhibition,  as  indeed 
it  must  be  if  primordium  formation  is  to  be  possible  at  all.  Thus 

A.  Induced  reorganization,  a:  Large  stage-3  regenerator 
(activated)  grafted  to  small  non-differentiating  partner  (inhibited 
with  respect  to  anlage  formation),  b:  Initial  partial  regression 
of  the  primordium  under  influence  of  partner,  c:  Revival  of 
regeneration  primordium  and  induction  of  reorganization 
primordium  in  small  partner,  d:  Regeneration-reorganization, 
with  resorption  and  renewal  of  oral  structures  in  the  reorganizer, 

producing  a  doublet  stentor. 

B.  a:  Stage-4  regenerator  grafted  to  small  non-differentiating 
partner,  b:  More  advanced  regeneration  primordium  does  not 
suffer  partial  regression  and  a  reorganization  anlage  is  induced 
so  rapidly  that  no  concomitant  stripe  multiplication  occurs 
{y,  cf.  x).   c,  d:  Regeneration-reorganization  produces  a  doublet. 

C.  a:  Stage-o  regenerator  (stripes  splitting  in  primordium 
site)  grafted  to  small  non-differentiating  cell  —  immediately 
following  operation  to  show  how  cells  are  split  down  the  backs 
opened  out  and  pressed  together,  b:  Regenerator  continues  to 
stage  2,  induced  primordium  in  stage  i  (predominance  of  activa- 
tion), c:  Conspicuous  regression  of  both  anlagen  (predominance 
of  inhibition),  d:  Revival  of  primordia  leading  to  doublet 
formation  through  regeneration  on  one  side  and  reorganization 

on  the  other. 

D.  Abortive  primordium  development,  a;  Stage-4  regenera- 
tor grafted  to  non-differentiating  animal  of  same  or  larger  size. 
b,  c:  No  induction.  Advanced  primordium  arrested,  shortened, 
crumpled  —  neither  developing  nor  resorbing  and  showing  no 
normal    membranelles.      d:    Simultaneous    regeneration    and 

reorganization  occurring  much  later. 


142  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

if  a  large  and  a  very  small  non-differentiating  stentor  are  grafted 
together  and  the  mouthparts  then  excised  from  the  minor  compo- 
nent, simultaneous  regeneration  and  reorganization  then  occur  in 
the  graft  complex  (Tartar,  1954).  For  now  the  reorganization 
primordium  is  not  to  be  regarded  as  induced  by  the  regenerator ; 
instead  the  stimulus  to  regeneration  somehow  passes  from  the 
small  cell  to  the  larger,  causing  it  to  produce  its  own  state  of 
activation. 

Moreover,  in  some  cases,  stage-i  regenerators  did  induce 
reorganization  in  non-differentiating  partners  which  were  much 
larger  than  they.  Here  it  is  possible  that  something  of  the  powerful 
original  stimulus  to  regeneration,  whatever  its  nature  may  be, 
lingers  in  the  early  regenerator  to  boost  its  inductive  influence. 

The  relevance  of  the  intimacy  of  union  on  the  timing  and  final 
result  of  the  interaction  between  a  differentiating  and  a  non- 
differentiating  stentor  will  be  important  in  analyzing  the  basis  of 
the  mutual  influences  (Weisz,  1956).  When  the  two  partners  are 
firmly  but  not  broadly  joined,  the  reorganization  primordium 
induced  by  a  regenerator  is  noticeably  tardy  in  appearing  (Fig.  36A) ; 
when  the  joining  is  tenuous,  there  is  no  induction  at  all  (b). 


B 


Fig.  36.  Barriers  to  induced  reorganization,  shown  in  tail-to-tail 
telobiotics  with  one  head  excised. 

A.  When    union    is    broad,    regeneration    in    one    induces 
reorganization  in  the  other  partner,  but  with  considerable  delay. 

B.  If  connection  is  tenuous,  no  induced  primordium  forma- 

tion occurs.    (After  Tartar,  1958b.) 

2.  Timing  the  period  of  activation 

When  a  late  stage-4  regenerator  is  grafted  to  a  smaller  non- 
differentiating  stentor,  there  is  usually  the  transient  induction 
of  a  beginning  reorganization  primordium;  but  the  regenerator 


ACTIVATION    AND    INHIBITION:    ORAL    PRIMORDIUM    143 

now  overtakes  the  reorganizer,  and  as  the  original  primordium 
goes  into  its  final  development  the  induced  anlagen  is  resorbed 
(see  Fig.  38E).  Stage-5  regenerators  are  no  longer  able  to  induce 
reorganization  in  a  partner  cell.  Therefore  we  may  say  that  as 
anlage  development  goes  to  completion  the  state  of  activation 
ceases  and  is  replaced  by  a  state  of  inhibition. 

When  does  activation  begin?  This  time  can  be  determined  by 
several  tests.  If  a  sector  bearing  the  primordium  of  a  regenerator 
is  grafted  into  a  regenerating  stentor  the  transplanted  anlage 
continues  its  development  along  with  that  of  the  host;  but  if  the 
primordium  is  grafted  into  a  regenerator  in  which  the  primordium 
has  not  yet  appeared,  the  transplanted  anlage  is  resorbed.  When 
regeneration  is  induced  by  causing  the  membranellar  band  to  be 
shed  in  salt  solutions  and  when  some  of  the  salt  is  carried  over 
with  the  specimen  and  regeneration  is  thereby  much  delayed,  such 
cells  are  also  not  able  to  support  primordia  grafted  to  them 
although  it  may  have  been  many  hours  since  the  stimulus  to 
regenerate  was  given.  And  if  stage-2  or  3  primordia  are  implanted 
on  non-differentiating  cells  whose  heads  or  mouthparts  are  then 
excised,  the  stimulus  to  regeneration  in  the  host  is  not  itself 
sufficient  to  support  the  primordium  development  and  the  anlage 
remains  for  a  long  time  in  arrested  development  or  may  even 
become  partially  resorbed,  but  is  finally  revived  and  continues 
differentiation  as  the  host  primordium  itself  appears  and  develops. 
Considering  these  results  and  allowing  for  an  appreciable  time-lag 
in  the  effects  upon  each  other  of  host  and  graft,  we  can  conclude 
that  activation  is  not  developed  to  an  effective  state  until  shortly 
before  the  primordium  appears. 

3.  Relation  of  the  macronucleus  to  activation  and  inhibition 

The  cell  states  relating  to  primordium  formation  and  develop- 
ment seem  to  reside  in  the  cytoplasm  and  are  possibly  restricted 
to  the  cortical  layer  or  ectoplasm.  The  nuclei  probably  respond 
to  changes  in  the  cell  state,  as  when  macronuclear  nodes  condense 
and  micronuclei  undergo  mitosis  simultaneous  with  the  passing 
of  the  cell  from  its  state  of  activation  to  one  of  inhibition ;  but  they 
do  not  seem  to  be  the  bearers  or  determiners  of  these  cell  states. 
The  evidence  for  this  is,  briefly,  that  enucleated  non-differentiating 
stentors  cause  as  prompt  and  as  complete  a  resorption  of  anlage  in 


144  '^"E    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

nucleated  primordium  sectors  grafted  to  them  as  nucleated  hosts, 
and  the  macronuclear  nodes  of  an  early  regenerator  can  be 
replaced  by  those  of  a  non-differentiating  cell  without  stopping 
the  course  of  regeneration  (unpublished).  In  the  latter  experiment 
"non-regenerator"  nucleus  clumps  and  renodulates  on  cue  just 
as  the  original  nucleus  would  have  done.  It  therefore  appears  that 
the  nucleus  simply  responds  to  any  demands  made  upon  it  by  the 
cytoplasm  without  taking  the  lead  in  cell  redifferentiation,  though 
of  course  the  macronucleus  is  essential  to  primordium  formation. 
Yet  the  presence  of  the  macronucleus  seems  to  be  necessary  for 
achieving  a  state  of  activation  in  the  cytoplasm,  as  suggested  by 
the  following  experiment.  Both  feeding  organelles  and  macro- 
nuclei  were  removed  from  coeruleus  and  after  five  hours  re- 
generation primordium  sectors  were  grafted  to  them.  Normally 
the  hosts  would  have  been  in  active  regeneration  by  this  time  but 
now,  lacking  the  nucleus,  they  behaved  exactly  like  non- 
differentiating  hosts,  causing  resorption  of  the  grafted  anlage.  It 
follows  that  the  nucleus  is  not  only  very  probably  essential  to 
protein  synthesis  in  the  elaboration  of  the  oral  primordium  but  is 
also  necessary  for  the  achievement  of  the  postulated  state  of 
activation  in  the  cytoplasm.  Another  finding  which  points  to  the 
same  conclusion  is  that  if  regenerators  with  early  primordia  are 
enucleated  the  anlage  are  then  soon  resorbed.  Not  only  is  there  no 
further  synthesis  of  ciliary  proteins,  or  whatever  is  involved  in  the 
further  development  of  the  primordium ;  the  developing  organelles, 
in  contrast  to  remnants  of  those  already  formed,  are  actually 
taken  down  and  resorbed,  so  that  it  appears  that  the  nucleus  is 
necessary  for  the  maintenance  as  well  as  the  achievement  of  the 
state  of  activation. 

4.  Relation  of  intact  feeding  organelles  to  activation 
and  inhibition 

Because  removal  of  all  or  of  a  substantial  portion  of  the  feeding 
organelles  initiates  their  complete  regeneration,  it  is  natural  to 
suppose  that  the  formed  parts  had  exerted  an  inhibition  on  the 
production  of  their  like.  Indeed,  it  is  clear  from  the  experiments 
recounted  above  that  non-differentiating  stentors  are  continually 
inhibiting  primordium  formation  because  they  even  cause 
resorption  of  already  well-formed  anlagen  grafted  on  them.  This 


ACTIVATION    AND    INHIBITION:    ORAL    PRIMORDIUM    145 

relationship  is  common  to  regeneration  in  general,  whether  of 
plants  or  multicellular  animals;  for  it  is  a  general  rule  in  re- 
generation and  embryological  studies  that  formed  parts  prevent 
neo-formations  of  their  like  and  so  allow  the  organism  to  attain 
stability  and  unity  of  form  (see  Child,  1941;  and  Rose,  1957). 
That  there  is  specific  inhibition  between  formed  and  potential 
structures  can  be  demonstrated  on  the  cell  level  in  Stentor  where 
it  presents  special  problems  as  well  as  unusual  opportunities  for 
analysis. 

The  first  exploratory  experiment  in  this  direction  was  performed 
by  Prowazek  (1904)  when  he  cut  dividing  coeruleus  in  two  trans- 
versely. If  the  animals  were  in  an  early  stage  of  fission,  the  half  of 
the  primordium  remaining  in  the  anterior  fragment  was  resorbed, 
but  not  in  the  posterior  piece ;  yet  he  was  not  aware  of  the  full 
significance  of  this  simple  test.  Today  we  can  say  that  the  portion 
of  the  anlage  in  the  anterior  fragment  was  resorbed  because  of 
the  presence  of  the  intact  feeding  organelles,  and  conversely,  that 
their  absence  in  the  posterior  piece  permitted  the  maintenance  and 
continued  development  of  its  section  of  the  primordium. 

Weisz  (1956)  later  found  that  it  was  sufficient  merely  to  sHce 
into  an  early  divider  to  cause  total  resorption  of  the  entire  primor- 
dium. I  have  also  found  that  a  single  slice  into  the  cell,  merely 
removing  the  tail  tip  (Tartar,  1958c),  or  even  a  too  long  exposure 
to  the  quieting  agent,  methyl  cellulose,  may  cause  stage  i  and  2 
dividers  to  resorb  the  primordium.  Even  at  stage  4  the  anlage 
may  be  completely  resorbed  in  the  adoral  half  of  dividers  cut  in 
two  longitudinally.  Early  primordium  sectors  cut  from  these 
dividers,  including  the  mouthparts  but  not  much  of  the  membran- 
ellar  band,  also  resorb  the  anlage  when  isolated  but  not  if  the 
original  mouthparts  are  also  excised  from  the  piece.  The  response 
of  regenerators  to  cutting  Weisz  found  to  be  entirely  different, 
for  the  primordium  is  then  never  resorbed  because  of  injuries.  This 
point  has  also  been  adequately  confirmed;  following  a  standard 
maximal  disturbance  in  which  the  regenerator  was  cut  into  three 
sections  and  spread  out  widely,  the  anlagen  were  never  resorbed 
(Tartar,  1958c). 

A  simple  explanation  for  this  difference  between  dividers  and 
regenerators  is  at  once  apparent.  It  is  not  because  the  division 
primordium  is  uniquely  subject  to  reversal  of  its  development 


146  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

(Weisz,  1956),  for  we  have  seen  that  regeneration  primordia  can 
also  be  caused  to  be  resorbed.  The  difference  lies  rather  in  the 
simple  fact  that  dividers  have  an  intact  set  of  feeding  organelles 
but  regenerators  do  not.  Thus  if  the  injurious  cut  through  a 
divider  is  such  as  to  remove  the  entire  feeding  organelles  or  the 
mouthparts,  then,  as  in  Prowazek's  original  experiment,  the 
division  primordium  is  not  resorbed.  And  therefore  the  simplest 
interpretation  is  that  presence  of  intact  organelles  is  the  cause  of 
resorption.  Then,  as  Weisz  himself  suggested,  in  division  (as  in 
reorganization)  the  primordium  site  is  somehow  enabled  to  escape 
the  inhibitive  action  of  the  existing  feeding  organelles  and  to 
produce  an  oral  primordium  in  spite  of  their  presence;  and  I 
would  add  that  cutting  injuries  in  some  manner  nullify  this 
delicate  escapement,  thus  enabling  the  formed  parts  to  re-exert 
their  full  inhibitive  force. 

Inhibition  by  the  intact  feeding  organelles  would  also  explain 
why  dividers  do  not  produce  a  new  primordium  at  once  after 
anlage  excision,  as  do  regenerators. 

The  situation  in  dividers  can  be  duplicated  in  regenerators  by 
grafting  a  new  head  in  place  of  the  one  that  was  removed  (Tartar, 
1958c).  If  the  regenerator  had  not  yet  produced  a  primordium,  it 
was  prevented  from  doing  so ;  or  if  it  already  had  an  early  primor- 
dium, this  was  then  resorbed  (Fig.  37).  When  tails  were  grafted 
instead  of  heads,  primordia  were  not  resorbed.  This  is  evidence 
that  the  formed  feeding  organelles  exert  an  inhibitive  action  on 
primordium  formation  and  development.  With  regenerators 
which  had  progressed  beyond  stage  2  the  effect  was  not  as  marked 
and  only  partial  resorption  or  merely  arrested  development 
occurred.  But  when  the  primordium  was  completely  resorbed  in 
recapped  regenerators  the  majority  of  the  specimens  later  re- 
organized. This  suggests  that  complete  healing  may  not  have 
occurred,  with  complete  union  of  lateral  striping,  and  thus  set  the 
stage  for  later  escapement  of  the  primordium  site  in  re- 
organization. 

Similarly,  it  may  be  that  in  division,  as  in  reorganization,  there 
is  some  temporary  and  invisible  severance  of  connection  between 
the  lateral  body  striping  and  the  feeding  organelles  sufficient  to 
break  the  path  of  oral  inhibition  and  permit  the  formation  of  a 
primordium    although    intact    feeding    organelles    are    present. 


ACTIVATION    AND    INHIBITION:    ORAL    PRIMORDIUM    147 

A 


Fig.  37.    Oral  inhibition  of  primordium  development. 

A.  Stage-2  regenerator  is  recapped  with  head  from  another 
stentor.  By  handling  only  pendent  portion  of  donor,  which  is 
subsequently  excised  (a),  injury  to  feeding  organelles  is 
prevented,  b:  Development  is  stopped  and  the  anlage  resorbed. 
This  occurs  neither  on  injury,  alone,  of  regenerator  nor  after 
implanting  tail  poles;  therefore  a  specific  inhibition  by  formed 
oral  structures.  Most  specimens  reorganized  later  {c,  d),  and 
some  divided  instead. 

B.  When  primordium  was  already  at  stage  4,  it  was  not 
resorbed  (a)  and  served  for  reorganizational  replacement  of  the 

grafted  feeding  organelles.    (After  Tartar,  1958c.) 

Reorganization  and  division  would  then  be  like  regeneration  in 
that  the  oral  structures  may  be  "self-excised",  and  if  so,  the 
regeneration  response  to  cutting  off  the  head  or  mouthparts  would 
be  not  so  much  an  adaptive  behavior  as  a  gross  imitation  or 
artificially  induced  performance  of  something  that  happens 
cryptically  in  the  recurring  processes  of  fission  and  reorganization. 
This  in  turn  would  at  last  answer  Gruber's  (1885a)  question  why 
stentors  should  be  so  capable  of  regenerating  from  injuries  such  as 
they  are  not  likely  to  encounter  in  nature,  as  well  as  explain  to  a 
considerable  extent  his  original  conception  of  the  close  similarity 
between  regeneration  and  division,  a  point  repeatedly  emphasized 
by  later  students  of  ciliate  morphogenesis  (see  Balamuth,  1940). 
We  need  to  learn  how  these  formed  feeding  organelles  exert  the 


148  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

inferred  inhibiting  effect  upon  the  primordium  site.  They  probably 
do  not  act  directly,  because  the  primordium  site  and  anlage  are 
at  some  distance  from  these  structures.  Moreover,  in  tandem 
grafts  the  head  of  the  anterior  cell  effectively  inhibits  regeneration 
in  the  posterior  partner,  the  head  of  which  has  been  excised, 
though  the  distance  between  ingestive  organelles  and  the  posterior 
primordium  site  is  then  abnormally  great.  Nor  do  these  organelles 
give  off  some  ''  inhibitory  substance  ",  since  regeneration  will  occur 
if  the  mouthparts  are  merely  cut  and  separated  or  the  intact  head 
rotated  in  place.  Not  the  materials  of  the  organelles  but  their 
proper  pattern  and  relationship  to  the  whole  is  essential  to  their 
inhibitory  effect.  Moreover,  non-differentiating  stentors  from 
which  the  mouthparts  have  just  been  excised  still  can  induce 
resorption  of  early  regeneration  primordia  grafted  to  them.  The 
tendency  of  the  normal  primordium  site  to  form  anlagen  is  appar- 
ently stronger  than  that  of  other  loci  in  the  lateral  ectoplasm,  and 
therefore  requires  a  stronger  inhibition.  This  is  indicated  by  the 
finding  that  fusions  of  six  aboral  halves  promptly  regenerate, 
whereas  anlagen  formation  in  these  grafts  without  normal  primor- 
dium sites  is  long  delayed  if  one  set  of  intact  feeding  organelles  is 
present  (Tartar,  1956a).  In  contrast,  when  one  set  of  feeding 
organelles  is  removed  from  a  doublet  stentor,  the  remaining  set  is 
insufficient  to  prevent,  or  often  even  to  delay,  regeneration  in  the 
"  unsaturated  "  primordium  site  left  on  the  cut  side. 

As  a  working  hypothesis  it  is  suggested  that  formed  oral  struc- 
tures act  upon  the  lateral  stripe  pattern,  with  which  they  are 
connected,  in  such  a  way  as  to  render  this  pattern  inhibitive  of 
primordium  development.  The  entire  cell-body  ectoplasm  would 
be  involved  in  this  inhibition,  as  indicated  by  the  fact  that  the 
larger  the  volume  of  cytoplasm  the  greater  the  inhibition  exerted. 
This  state  of  inhibition  could  then  be  transmitted  across  the 
borders  of  a  grafted  sector,  rendering  the  included  striping  in  the 
patch  also  inhibitory  and  producing  resorption  of  the  primordium ; 
or  the  state  of  inhibition  could  be  transmitted  in  a  similar  way  over 
the  ectoplasm  of  an  adjoining  cell.  Conversely,  when  the  head  is 
excised  or  the  mouthparts  removed,  oral  inhibition  is  dis- 
continued and  the  pattern  of  the  body  striping  gradually  trans- 
forms, with  the  aid  of  the  nucleus,  from  a  state  of  inhibition  to  one 
of  activation  which  is  to  be  characterized  in  the  same  way.  The 


ACTIVATION    AND    INHIBITION:    ORAL    PRIMORDIUM    149 

important  point  is  that  the  development  of  the  oral  primordium 
is  not  a  strictly  local  affair  except  in  morphological  terms,  that  the 
entire  ectoplasm  appears  to  be  a  continuum,  that  every  part  of  this 
ectoplasm — even  far  from  the  primordium  site — can  affect  the 
primordium  development  by  either  hindering  or  supporting  it, 
depending  on  the  intrinsic  state  of  that  cytoplasm. 

5.  Synchronization  of  developing  primordia 

In  stentor  grafts  or  complexes  of  more  than  one  individuality 
there  is  a  strong  tendency  for  both  or  all  oral  primordia  to  com- 
plete their  development  together  although  they  may  have  begun 
at  different  times.  This  synchronization  was  first  indicated  by 
Johnson  in  his  observation  of  redifferentiation  in  an  adventitious 
double-tandem  monster  of  coeruleiis.  The  anterior  individuality 
had  a  complete  set  of  feeding  organelles  but  the  posterior  lacked 
the  mouthparts.  An  anlage  first  appeared  in  the  posterior  compo- 
nent, then  somewhat  later  primordium  formation  also  occurred 
in  the  anterior  component  which  had  no  need  for  regeneration; 
but  in  spite  of  the  difference  in  the  time  of  their  appearances  the 
two  primordia  soon  fell  into  phase  and  developed  simultaneously. 
This  case  may  therefore  be  regarded  as  the  first  observation  of  a 
regenerator  inducing  reorganization  in  its  partner ;  and  it  suggested 
that  in  such  double  systems  both  parts  tend  to  do  the  same  things 
together  and  at  the  same  time. 

Even  within  a  single  primordium  the  parts  tend  to  develop 
together  when  they  might  do  otherwise.  Thus  if  half  of  an  early 
anlage  is  excised  there  is  a  compensating  growth  in  length  of  the 
primordium  but  a  difference  between  younger  and  older  developing 
membranelles  is  not  detectable  (Tartar,  1957c).  Evidently  the 
older  part  waits  while  the  growth  of  the  new  part  is  accelerated. 
This  effect  is  still  more  striking  in  cases  in  which  an  original 
primordium  later  extends  into  a  new  primordmm  site  which  is 
often  produced  by  graftings.  This  and  other  examples  described 
in  Fig.  38  show  how  an  anlage  extension  or  an  induced  re- 
organization primordium  may  differentiate  very  rapidly  in  order 
to  catch  up  with  the  first  anlage,  often  apparently  cutting  short  its 
growth  in  length  in  its  haste  to  develop.  Converselv,  in  the  achieve- 
ment of  simultaneity  of  development,  arrest  and  delay  of  one  of 
the  anlagen  is  often  noticeable. 


50 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENT OR 

^3 


a  be 


Fig.  38.    Synchronization  of  primordia  within  a  graft  complex. 

A.  a:  Anlage  of  a  stage- 1  regenerator  excised  and  patch  with 
stage-3  regeneration  primordium  implanted,  b:  Stage-3  anlage 
arrested  while  an  extension  occurs  adjacent  to  wide-stripe  area 
of  host  which  forms  a  new  primordium,  both  the  latter  in  stage  i . 
c:  All  three  anlagen  synchronous  by  stage  4.  d:  Primordia  join, 
with  metachronal  waves  of  membranelles  continuous  in  direction 
of  arrows.  Implanted  anlage,  with  its  extension,  forms  a  V-shape 
which  undergoes  stomatogenesis  at  the  point  and  a  doublet 
stentor  is  formed. 


ACTIVATION    AND    INHIBITION:    ORAL    PRIMORDIUM    151 

These  are  only  a  sample  of  many  observations  (unpublished)  in 
which  synchronous  development  within  the  same  system  by  arrest 
of  one  primordium,  or  acceleration  of  the  other,  or  both  occurred. 
But  if  the  phase  difference  between  the  two  anlagen  is  great, 
simultaneity  cannot  be  achieved  and  the  older  primordium 
overtakes  the  much  younger  one,  causing  the  system  to  pass  into 
a  state  of  morphogenetic  inhibition,  resulting  in  resorption  or 
very  incomplete  development  of  the  younger  anlage  (Fig.  38E). 

Synchronization  of  primordia,  often  involving  astonishing 
accelerations  and  delays  in  development,  should  have  important 
implications  which  are  only  coming  into  view.  For  one  thing,  it  is 
clear  that  each  primordium  is  not  given  a  start  and  a  source  of 
substrates  and  a  suitable  environment  to  proceed  on  its  own. 
Instead,  the  two  primordia  are  as  it  were  in  continuous  "com- 
munication" with  each  other  though  they  may  be  at  opposite 
sides  of  the  cell.  One  suggestion  that  comes  to  mind  is  that  there 
is  a  competition  for  substrates  which  the  younger  primordia  are 
able  to  take  up  more  avidly.  But  the  supply  does  not  seem  to  be 
limited,  since  induced  primordia  are  formed  and  present  anlage 

B.  a:  Telebiotic  with  narrow  connection  has  stage-3  anlage 
at  end  from  which  the  feeding  organelles  were  excised,  b: 
Original  primordium  at  stage  5  ;  induced  anlage  appeared  at  other 
end  and  developed  precipitously  to  stage  4.  c:  Both  anlagen 
synchronized    at    stage    6    and    regeneration    with    induced 

reorganization  continues. 

C.  a:  Smaller  non-differentiating  stentor  grafted  to  stage-3 
regenerator,  b:  Original  anlage  now  in  stage  4  and  induced 
reorganization  primordium  has  developed  so  rapidly  that  it  is 
now  in  the  same  stage,    c,  d:  Synchronous  regeneration  and 

reorganization  to  produce  a  doublet. 

D.  a:  Stage-3  divider,  with  mouthparts  excised,  grafted  to 
non-differentiating  stentor  of  same  size,  b:  Division  primor- 
dium develops  to  stage  4  but  becomes  crumpled  as  it  is  arrested 
and  waits  for  induced  reorganization  to  attain  the  same  stage. 
c:    Synchronous    regeneration-reorganization    proceeds    from 

stage  4  onward.    The  graft  complex  did  not  divide. 

E.  Stage-5  regenerator  grafted  to  non-differentiating  partner. 
A  reorganization  primordium  is  induced  {a)  in  the  partner,  but 
the  regenerator  continues  development  and  passes  out  of  the 
stage  of  activation.  Thereby  induced  anlage  is  "overtaken"  and 
can  neither  develop  to  normal  length  nor  produce  mouthparts 

to  replace  those  resorbed. 


152  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

readily  extend  themselves  into  new  primordium  sites.  Another 
possibility  is  that  somehow  the  anlage  does  receive  morphogenetic 
guidance  from  the  surrounding  ectoplasm  which  acts  as  a  unit, 
and  that  the  ectoplasm  as  a  whole  gives  "information"  only  one 
step  at  a  time,  instead  of  a  single  command  to  make  a  primordium. 
However  this  may  be,  we  see  again  that  the  cell  makes  a  strong 
attempt  to  act  together  in  all  its  parts  as  a  single  integrated  unit. 

6.  Activation  in  reorganizers  and  dividers 

It  is  natural  to  suppose  that  the  state  of  activation  which  is  not 
of  the  nucleus  but  of  the  cytoplasm  and  can  be  transmitted  from 
one  cell  to  another,  or  from  a  host  cell  to  a  grafted  patch,  is  to  be 
found  whenever  an  oral  primordium  develops.  Therefore  re- 
organizers  and  dividers  should  also  be  in  this  state.  This  can  be 
tested  by  determining  whether  they  continue  to  support  oral 
differentiation  in  regeneration  primordia  grafted  to  them,  in  the 
same  way  that  regenerating  cells  do.  They  do.  Reorganizers 
support  regeneration  primordia  (Tartar,  1958b),  likewise  for 
dividers.  But  in  the  case  of  dividers  the  intact  feeding  organelles 
seem  to  exert  a  greater  effect  than  in  reorganizers  and  the  mouth- 
parts  usually  have  to  be  excised  if  a  grafted  anlage  is  not  to  be 
resorbed  along  with  the  host's,  following  the  injury  of  cutting. 
Conversely,  both  division  and  reorganization  primordia  are 
resorbed  when  grafted  to  non-differentiating  cells.  We  may  con- 
clude that  oral  primordia  arising  under  any  circumstance  require 
the  same  type  of  cytoplasmic  as  well  as  nuclear  support. 

7.  Rerouting  the  oral  primordium 

This  state  of  activation,  or  readiness  to  support  primordium 
development  which  is  common  to  all  re-differentiating  stentors, 
points  to  a  basic  similarity  of  dividers,  reorganizers,  and  regener- 
ators which  has  often  been  remarked.  It  was  Gruber  who  first 
noted  that  oral  regeneration  is  accomplished  through  the  formation 
of  a  lateral  primordium  like  that  appearing  in  the  normal  course  of 
division.  The  unique  characteristic  of  fission  is  not  anlage 
formation  but  the  development  and  constriction  of  a  division 
furrow,  and  this  aper9u  of  Johnson's  is  amply  confirmed  by  the 
fact  that  dividers  as  early  as  stage  3  can  proceed  to  complete 
separation  after  the  primordium  is  excised.  Otherwise,  events  in 


ACTIVATION    AND    INHIBITION  I    ORAL    PRIMORDIUM    153 

regeneration  and  division  are  very  similar.  In  both,  the  macro- 
nuclear  beads  coalesce.  Causin  even  described  an  instance  of 
temporary  division  of  this  compacted  nucleus  in  a  regenerating 
stentor,  though  this  is  probably  exceptional.  In  both  there  is 
mitotic  division  of  the  micronuclei  (Guttes  and  Guttes,   1959). 

Reorganization  is  obviously  similar  to  regeneration  in  that  a  new 
set  of  feeding  organelles  is  produced  while  the  original  individuality 
of  the  organism  is  retained,  and  the  accompanying  nuclear  changes 
are  similar.  Schwartz  (1935)  commented  on  the  resemblances 
between  reorganizers  and  dividers:  in  both  there  is  oral  primor- 
dium  formation  in  the  presence  of  an  already  complete  set  of 
feeding  organelles;  and  in  reorganizers  as  in  dividers  there  can 
occur  the  mitotic  multiplication  of  micronuclei  as  well  as  an 
increase  in  the  number  of  macronuclear  nodes.  A  basic  similarity 
in  division,  reorganization,  and  regeneration  was  recognized  by 
Weisz  (1949a)  who  conceived  of  these  processes  as  alternative 
responses  to  a  graded  series  of  stimuli  increasingly  forceful  in 
their  extrinsic  character. 

In  all  three  programs  of  morphogenesis,  oral  primordium 
formation  occurs  and  a  basic  similarity  is  best  demonstrated  by 
the  fact  that  the  anlage  can  be  rerouted  to  serve  other  ends  than 
that  for  which  it  was  originally  "intended".  In  other  words, 
morphogenesis  can  be  Preprogrammed";  for  it  can  be  shown 
that  a  stentor  is  not  irrevocably  set  upon  one  course  from  the  start. 
Johnson,  for  example,  described  a  case  in  which  a  reorganizing 
coerideiis  seemed  to  have  transformed  itself  into  a  divider.  At  first 
the  primordium  ran  all  the  way  forward  to  contact  the  original 
membranellar  band,  as  is  characteristic  of  reorganizers,  but  then 
a  secondary  contractile  vacuole  developed  and  the  anterior  portion 
of  the  anlage  was  resorbed,  whereupon  the  cell  divided.  I  read  this 
report  with  some  scepticism  because  I  have  never  seen  resorption 
restricted  to  one  section  of  the  primordium;  although  I  have 
observed  three  instances  in  which  a  coeruleiis  which  should  have  re- 
organized divided  instead.  These  were  from  regenerating  animals, 
the  primordium  and  neighboring  Ectoplasm  and  endoplasm  of 
which  had  been  excised  so  that  they  had  already  suffered  a  con- 
siderable reduction  in  volume,  which  is  supposed  to  preclude 
division  (Weisz,  1956).  A  new  anlage  was  then  produced  so 
rapidly  that  no  stripe  multiplication  occurred  and  the  resulting 


\^- 


J  R  A  R  y 


'V 


154 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


frontal  field  and  head  was  much  too  small  in  relation  to  the  size 
of  the  cell.  This  disproportion  is  almost  always  the  occasion  for 
reorganization,  defined  as  the  spontaneous  replacement  of  major 
portions  of  an  intact  set  of  feeding  organelles  by  a  new  one ;  but  in 


Fig.  39.    Rerouting  of  the  oral  primordium. 

A.  Reorganization  anlage  presumably  serving  for  division. 
a:  Primordium  excised  from  stage-3  regenerator,  h:  New 
anlage  promptly  formed  in  line  of  heal,  without  stripe  multipli- 
cation, c:  Hence  regenerated  frontal  field  and  head  are  too  small. 
d:  This  disproportion  is  usually  the  stimulus  to  reorganization 
and  an  anlage  altogether  like  that  of  reorganizer  (not  D-shaped 
as  in  divider)  is  formed,  e:  Yet  animal  may  divide  instead  of 
reorganizing,  even  though  its  original  volume  was  considerably 
reduced  by  excision. 


ACTIVATION    AND    INHIBITION:    ORAL    PRIMORDIUM    155 

these  instances  the  stentors  divided  instead  (Fig.  39).  One  may 
suppose  that  for  some  obscure  reason  the  primordium  which 
developed  for  the  purpose  of  reorganization  was  used  instead  for 
the  division,  nevertheless,  of  animals  considerably  smaller  than 
the  maximum  size. 

It  is  also  possible,  but  again  not  indubitably  demonstrated, 
that  regenerators  can  be  converted  into  dividers.  In  experiments 
already  described,  all  of  the  membranellar  band  but  none  of  the 
mouthparts  or  all  of  the  mouthparts  but  none  of  the  membranellar 
band  were  removed  from  larger  animals,  with  the  result  that 
division  almost  invariably  occurred,  thus  representing  cases  in 
which  an  operation  which  would  ordinarily  be  expected  to  incite 
regeneration  led  to  fission  instead.  The  primordia  did  appear  at 
first  exactly  like  those  of  regenerators,  but  subsequently  the 
anterior  ends  of  the  anlagen  bent  to  the  right  as  division  was 
accomplished  in  the  typical  manner  (b). 

Regenerating  stentors  can  easily  be  converted  into  reorganizers. 
When  a  complete  head  is  grafted  to  a  regenerator  to  replace  the 
one  which  was  excised  and  the  regeneration  anlage  is  not  resorbed, 
then  this  primordium  finds  attachment  to  the  intact  membranellar 
band  and  the  preexisting  mouthparts  are  resorbed  as  they  are 
replaced  (see  Fig.  37). 

Dividers  are  frequently  converted  into  reorganizers  by  many 
types  of  operation  which  permit  the  continued  development  of 
the  division  primordium  but  somehow  block  furrow  formation. 
Causin  reported  that  mere  transfer  of  dividing  stentors  onto  a 
slide  often  resulted  in  their  undergoing  reorganization  instead, 

B.  Regenerator  becomes  a  divider,  a:  If  either  membranellar 
band  (as  shown)  or  the  mouthparts  only  are  excised,  a  regenera- 
tion primordium  is  called  for  and  appears  {b)  but  serves  for 
division  instead  {c)  even  though  ablation  decreased  cell  volume. 

d:  Proter  regenerates  proportionate  oral  structures  later. 

C.  Divider  becomes  reorganizer.  a:  Stage-3  divider  grafted 
to  oral  half  of  a  small,  non-differentiating  stentor.  b:  No 
induced  primordium  in  small  partner ;  anlage  of  divider  develops 
to  stage  6  without  commencing  division  or  reorganization,  c: 
Anlage  finally  used  to  reorganize  larger  animal ;  later  the  mouth- 
parts of  the  partner  were  also  resorbed  though  having  no 
reorganization  primordium  from  which  to  replace  them.  Next 
day  the  specimen  performed  double  regeneration-reorganization. 


156  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

and  this  was  confirmed  by  Hetherington  (1932b).  When  mid-stage 
dividers  were  greatly  disturbed  by  cutting  and  spreading  them  out 
in  a  clover-leaf  pattern,  the  separated  parts  then  healed  together 
and  the  primordium  continued  to  develop,  but  almost  all  of  the 
specimens  reorganized  instead  of  dividing  (Tartar,  1958c). 
Division  was  usually  only  thereby  postponed,  and  successful 
fission  with  a  new  primordium  generally  occurred  some  time  later. 
Likewise,  when  heads  of  early  dividers  were  circumscribed  and 
rotated  180°  on  the  body,  there  occurred  an  initial  partial  regression 
of  the  division  primordia,  probably  due  to  the  cutting  injury  as 
such,  after  which  the  anlagen  continued  developing  but  moved 
forward  instead  of  posteriorly  and  the  animals  reorganized  instead 
of  dividing.  In  three  cases  a  stage-3  divider  was  grafted  to  a  small 
non-differentiating  stentor  or  to  the  oral  longitudinal  half  of  such 
an  animal.  The  primordium  served  only  to  replace  the  feeding 
organelles  of  the  divider  and,  surprisingly  enough,  the  mouthparts 
of  the  partner  were  also  gradually  resorbed  though  there  were 
none  to  take  its  place  (Fig.  39c).  When  early  dividers  were  grafted 
to  regenerators,  regeneration  proceeded  on  one  side  while  re- 
organization instead  of  division  occurred  on  the  other  as  already 
mentioned  in  connection  with  dividers  failing  to  induce  division. 
Even  when  two  stage-3  dividers  were  grafted  together  in  homo- 
polar  parabiosis  they  reorganized  doubly  instead  of  dividing.  It  is 
clear  that  furrow  formation  is  not  determined  from  the  beginning 
of  the  division  process  but  is  inaugurated  much  later,  so  that  shifts 
from  division  to  reorganization  are  possible. 

Likewise  dividers  can  easily  be  changed  into  regenerators. 
Causin  had  at  least  one  case  in  which  he  cut  off  the  anterior  right 
hand  corner  with  membranelles  of  an  early  dividing  coeruleus  the 
primordium  of  which  then  served  for  regeneration  instead  of 
division.  When  primordium  sectors  were  cut  and  isolated  from 
dividing  animals,  these  pieces  made  no  attempt  to  divide  but 
used  the  anlagen  to  regenerate  the  missing  ingestive  organelles 
(Tartar,  1958c).  It  was  also  shown  that  if  the  head  or  feeding 
organelles  are  excised  from  dividing  cells  they  then  regenerated 
instead,  postponed  fission  with  the  formation  of  a  new  division 
primordium  usually  occurring  sometime  later.  In  conclusion  it 
may  be  said  that  in  their  beginning  phases  fission,  reorganization, 
and  regeneration  are  more  similar  than  different,  so  that  a  stentor 


ACTIVATION    AND    INHIBITION:    ORAL    PRIMORDIUM    157 

embarked  upon  any  one  of  these  courses  is  not  irrevocably  deter- 
mined to  pursue  no  other. 

The  experimental  analysis  reviewed  in  this  chapter  demonstrates 
that  stentors  alternate  through  at  least  two  cell  states  involving 
some  pervasive  aspect  of  the  cell.  A  prolonged  state  of  inhibition 
of  oral  primordium  formation  which  maintains  the  status  quo  of 
the  formed  organism  alternates  with  another  and  more  transitory 
state  promoting  redifferentiation  of  feeding  organelles  which 
prevails  during  regeneration,  reorganization,  and  division. 
Moreover,  the  stimulus  to  regeneration  appears  to  be  another 
condition  separable  from  the  subsequent  activation,  transmissible 
to  any  grafted  partner  regardless  of  size  and  resulting  in  its 
parallel  reorganization.  Whether  there  is  a  "  division  state "  or 
predisposition  to  fission  which  is  Hkewise  transmissible  in  fusion 
complexes  is  still  obscured  by  contradictory  evidence. 

Besides  clarifying  the  question  of  division,  we  next  need  to  know 
in  what  parts  of  stentor  these  cell  states  reside.  Present  evidence 
suggests  that  the  nucleus  is  not  involved,  since  macronuclei  can 
be  exchanged  between  regenerators  and  non- differentiating 
stentors  without  effect.  A  nucleus  or  some  nucleus  is  essential  for 
primordium  formation  and  development  but  this  organelle 
apparently  does  not  take  the  lead.  Enucleated  non-differentiating 
stentors  are  as  capable  of  inducing  anlagen  resorption  as  nucleate. 
Preliminary  tests  in  which  stentors  bereft  of  the  endoplasm  show 
the  same  inhibitive  influence  suggest  that  cell  states  reside  in  the 
cortical  layer.  If  so,  these  states  characterize  the  entire  ectoplasm 
because  the  effect  is  quantitative  and  depends  on  the  relative  sizes 
of  the  joined  stentors.  Every  part  of  this  or  some  other  pervasive 
feature  of  the  cell  may  be  involved  in  the  cell  states  of  activation 
and  inhibition  and  somehow  capable  of  affecting  what  occurs 
locally  at  the  primordium  site,  as  indicated  by  the  quantitative 
relationships. 

After  those  parts  of  stentor  which  "carry"  or  take  the  lead  in 
establishing  cell  states  are  identified,  the  next  step  according  to 
conventional  procedure  would  be  to  obtain  a  biochemical 
characterization  of  the  changes  in  these  parts.  It  is  natural  to 
suppose  that  intercellular  transmission  in  grafts  would  occur  via 
the  semi-fluid  endoplasm  which  flows  and  mixes  between  the  two 


158  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

partners.  For  instance,  this  endoplasm,  during  primordium 
formation  and  development,  might  be  charged  with  an  unusual 
amount  of  RNA  in  support  of  the  extensive  synthesis  which  then 
presumably  occurs.  But  if  it  is  the  semi-solid  ectoplasm  which  is 
involved,  the  transmission  would  be  more  probably  something 
like  an  electrical  excitation  of  a  more  novel  character.  Moreover, 
the  synchronization  of  developing  anlagen  without  indication  of 
competition  for  substrates  suggests  that  not  one  substance  or 
state  of  excitation  is  concerned  but  a  series,  paralleling  the  stages 
in  primordium  development. 

If  nourished  stentors  are  continually  undergoing  structural 
growth  and  not  merely  stretching  or  extending  the  distance 
between  their  formed  parts  as  seems  evident  in  the  case  of  the 
lateral  striping  (see  Fig.  iia),  how  is  this  possible  when  during 
the  same  period  synthesis  and  morphogenesis  in  oral  redifferentia- 
tion  is  being  so  effectively  inhibited  that  a  stentor  can  even  cause 
the  regression  of  the  primordium  of  another  stentor  and  even  after 
that  anlage  has  been  well-started  ?  Yet  extensive  nodal  increase  in 
the  macronucleus  does  seem  to  require  the  state  of  activation  or  its 
final  phases,  since  this  increase  occurs  only  during  the  last  stages 
of  primordium  development  and  it  appears  that  reorganizers  may 
instigate  anlagen  formation  in  order  to  accomplish  this  nuclear 
increase.  Evidently  the  different  parts  of  the  pattern  of  cortical 
differentiations,  however,  constitute  a  very  precise  responding 
system  in  respect  to  growth ;  and  this  is  also  indicated  by  specific 
resorption  of  extra  mouthparts  or  in  a  disproportionately  long 
membranellar  band,  when  all  other  parts  remain  apparently 
unaffected. 

In  the  resolution  of  such  problems  relating  to  cell  states  in 
Stentor  I  think  we  may  expect  interesting  discoveries  which  may 
in  turn  prove  relevant  to  cell  differentiation  in  general. 


CHAPTER    IX 

PRIMORDIUM    DEVELOPMENT 

An  acutely  felt  omission  in  our  data  on  Stentor  is  the  lack  of 
silver-stain  or  electron  micrographic  studies  of  the  developing 
oral  primordium.  We  have  therefore  no  idea  of  what  happens  on 
the  level  of  fine  structure  during  the  most  dramatic  act  of  cyto- 
differentiation.  Yet  much  can  be  said  in  simple  description  of  the 
forming  anlage  and  its  relation  to  the  pattern  of  lateral  striping. 
This  relationship  is  two-fold:  first,  some  of  the  ectoplasmic 
stripes  and  bands  adjacent  to  the  primordium  join  with  it  to 
complete  the  integrated  parts  of  the  ingestive  apparatus,  and 
second,  the  anlage  arises  in  definite  correlation  with  the  topo- 
graphy of  the  cell  surface. 

I.  Normal  location  and  development  of  the  primordium 

At  its  inception  the  oral  primordium  seems  to  violate  the 
cortical  pattern  because  it  makes  its  appearance  as  a  break  in  the 
ectoplasm,  cutting  across  the  striping.  The  unpigmented  rift  sug- 
gested to  Johnson  that  the  primordium  originates  in  the  endoplasm 
and  breaks  through  to  the  surface.  He  further  argued  that  the 
ectoplasm  is  too  thin  to  supply  the  materials  needed  for  this 
extensive  elaboration,  besides  being  too  highly  differentiated  to 
participate  in  such  ** embryonic"  formations.  In  the  related 
Bursaria  triincatella,  Schmahl  (1926)  also  found  that  the  primor- 
dium gives  the  appearance  of  breaking  through  the  ectoplasm,  yet 
his  cross-sections  clearly  showed  him  that  the  anlage  lay  entirely 
in  the  surface.  On  the  basis  of  other  ciliate  studies  (see  Lwoff, 
1950)  it  is  probable  that  the  anlage  is  formed  entirely  in  the  ecto- 
plasm and  requires  cortical  derivatives  such  as  kinetosomes  for 
its  composition.  Villeneuve-Brachon  (1940)  described  accumula- 
tion of  kinetosomes  in  the  early  primordium,  and  these,  in  Stentor 
as  in  the  related  Fabrea,  seem  to  arise  by  multipHcation  of  granules 
in  the  existing  ciliary  rows. 

159 


l6o  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

If  the  anlage  has  to  cross  the  striping,  it  is  apparent  that  the 
structural  components  of  the  clear  stripes  would  have  to  be 
sundered  and  the  pigment  granules  pushed  aside  to  make  room 
for  the  primordium.  Much  simpler  would  be  merely  to  have  the 
stripes  spread  apart  and  permit  the  anlage  to  form  parallel  to  them ; 
and  this  does  occur  in  Folliculina  ampulla,  in  which  the  primordium 
follows  the  contour  of  the  stripes  (Faure-Fremiet,  1932).  In  this 
and  other  forms  (see  Lwoif)  one  could  speak  of  a  ''  stomatogenic 
kinety  ",  if  all  kinetosomes  of  the  primordium  arise  in  connection 
with  a  single  kinety.  But  even  in  the  related  Semifolliculina, 
Andrews  (1923)  described  the  oral  primordium  as  cutting  across 
the  lateral  striping.  Also  like  Stentor,  there  is  in  the  Ophryoglenids 
no  single  kinety  which  produces  the  primordium,  according  to 
Mugard  (1947).  In  the  latter  there  seems  to  be  good  reason  for  this 
type  of  development.  Where  the  primordium  site  cuts  across  the 
lateral  stripes  these  are  bent  and  a  small  section  cut  out  of  each 
kinety,  the  sections  then  combining  to  form  the  anlage.  This  does 
not  occur  in  Stentor,  and  there  are  certainly  more  membranelles 
produced  than  kinetics  which  are  cut  by  the  anlage.  Although  the 
anlage  of  Stentor  may  come  to  lie  largely  parallel  to  the  lateral 
striping,  even  those  of  the  '' French  school "  did  not  maintain 
that  it  arises  from  a  single  ** stomatogenic  kinety"  (Chatton  and 
Seguela,  1940).  All  we  can  say  at  present  regarding  the  elaboration 
of  the  membranellar  band  is  that  kinetosomes  appear  from  some- 
where in  the  rift  provided  for  them,  sprout  cilia,  and  align  them- 
selves in  a  series  of  parallel  rows  to  make  the  membranelles.  This 
corresponds  to  Schmahl's  descriptions  of  Bursaria  in  which  he 
observed  first  single  cilia  with  separated  basal  bodies  later  coming 
together  as  membranelles. 

Normally,  the  primordium  always  appears  on  the  ventral  side 
of  the  cell  at  about  one-third  the  distance  in  contracted  animals 
between  the  mouthparts  and  the  posterior  pole.  This  precise 
localization  of  the  anlage  was  emphasized  by  Schuberg  (1890) 
who  correlated  it  with  local  differences  in  the  pattern  of  lateral 
striping.  Thus  the  primordium  appears  in  what  he  called  the 
ramifying  zone,  a  zone  of  abbreviated  striping  bounded  right  and 
left  by  bands  which  do  run  from  pole  to  pole.  Schwartz  (1935) 
however  has  pointed  out  that  as  the  primordium  increases  in 
length  its  anterior  end  may  overstep  the  left  boundary  stripe,  so 


PRIMORDIUM    DEVELOPMENT  l6l 

that  there  is  nothing  magically  restrictive  about  the  ramifying 
zone  as  far  as  primordium  formation  is  concerned. 

In  fact,  Morgan  (1901a)  soon  found  that  oral  regeneration 
occurred  readily  enough  even  after  the  normal  site  of  the  anlage 
was  removed,  and  Stevens  (1903)  confirmed  this  by  showing  that 
in  longitudinal  aboral  halves  lacking  this  site  entirely  the  oral 
primordium  appeared  in  the  line  of  heal.  Faure-Fremiet  then 
posed  explicitly  the  question  of  whether,  if  the  primordium  always 
appears  at  the  same  place  in  stentors,  there  is  some  specialized 
potential  restricted  to  this  area;  but  his  student  Causin  (1931) 
likewise  found  that  the  normal  primordium  site  could  be  com- 
pletely eliminated  without  preventing  regeneration.  Therefore 
there  are  not  localized  potentialities  for  oral  differentiation  in  one 
region  of  the  cell.  This  point  has  been  amply  confirmed  by  later 
students  of  Stentor,  including  myself.  Weisz  regarded  the  oral 
primordium  as  arising  from  a  single  stomatogenic  kinety  next  to 
the  left  boundary  stripe  of  the  ramifying  zone.  He  stated  (1953, 
1954)  that  not  only  tiny  fragments  but  also  pieces  larger  than  half 
the  cell  can  be  cut  which  do  not  regenerate  because  they  lack  the 
specialized  kinetosomes  of  this  meridian ;  although  reporting  that 
longitudinal  aboral  halves  can  regenerate  and  that  in  division  the 
primordium  bends  so  that  it  eventually  touches  the  left  boundary 
stripe,  from  which  it  follows  that  the  anlage  originates  away  from 
this  stripe.  That  the  ectoplasm  is  virtually  totipotent  throughout 
as  regards  oral  differentiation  will  become  even  clearer  as  our  dis- 
cussion proceeds,  and  this  is  not  contradictory  to  the  fact  that  the 
oral  primordium  usually  appears  in  a  certain  place. 

Stages  of  visible  change  in  the  anlage  in  regeneration  have  been 
defined  (Tartar,  1957c)  and  are  altogether  comparable  to  those 
of  division  (Fig.  40).  The  first  sign  of  primordium  formation  as 
seen  in  coeruleus  is  a  scooping  of  the  pigment  granules  to  each  side 
as  a  rift  crosses  about  10  granular  stripes  (Moxon,  1869).  A  groove 
with  slightly  projecting  flanges  is  evident  at  later  stages  in  cross- 
sectioned  view,  as  shown.  Stripe  multiplication  also  occurs  with 
the  splitting  of  granular  bands  both  immediately  above  and  below 
the  primordium.  The  primordium  extends  from  both  ends, 
cutting  across  more  stripes  posteriorly,  the  anterior  end  reaching 
forward.  Now  the  anlage  has  a  glistening  appearance,  presumably 
due  to  cilia  growing  out  from  kinetosomes  included  within  it. 


1 62 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


3^  <" 

W    '-'  <u 

P    (U  be 

0  bo    03 

— I      4->  C 

^-,    en  a 

.2  c  -M 

••    o  ^ 

^f  § 

S    5  <u 

"S  "^  • 

Jh     O  N 

(U     4-> 
?5      ^ 

b£).2  c 

ai     »H  C 

U     (D  ^ 

1  S  o 

5  a  «^ 


qj     =!        ^     ^^        ^       ^       ^ 


<u 


B  o 

.2  -^  -  ^ 

^  ^  5  go 


en     ^     4-> 


£    oj    C    ex  3 


TS  i3  £ 


w 


C3 


c« 


;^       C«       C 
I       ^      - 


0)     c« 


^■Si*  a»j-3 


be 

(At 


^  O    jH  X! 

«U  C    =^    8 

13  '::;  -O    rt^    S^    *^ 

(U  C^ 

^  s  ?^  s 


3    O 
u 
o    o 


be 

c 
o 

N     U 


(A 


O    ,C    ;3    J 


c  <^  •£ 


C    >    C    <u 
be  C  ^   W) 

>  -  ^  c 


bC 


<i>    S 


a   2   ^ 
t    bc  c 


=  .5   C 

(U     O     D    *^ 
>    -    3    O 


O  ^ 


o  "5 


c/3  bc^^ 

O  >.T3 

Oh  (U    TJ 

(U  03     CI 

'ii  (n    "^ 


III 

-^  a;  :3  .^ 
.  +i  ^  vw  ^ 
C  ^    o    D    > 

a>  ^  a-ts   Qj   bp^ 

'^    cu    ►L'l::;    be  B 

QJ   •  -^     flj   ^ — V  ■— '  I 

>..^    ^     ?^C^  O     ^ 
<v    C^^-'^ti  > 

^  ^   ^-.&  o  c;5  be  c 

<^   ^   -   §        =^   J3 

„   ^   .   ^   o  -6  •£   I 

o 

^   °"  5   «   o   t^ 


g^ 


:3 
be 


u    ^    C    ^. 
-^  Ti  ^  ^ 

03    ^  — '  T3 

!--        tJ        <U        I-l 

=^    be  o    ^,    ^    -. 
^  5  .^^  §._^-2  - 


bc^   (u   o   :;:=!  ^ 
5  t;  .S  t:  f« 


o  ">  _, 

C  .ir  03 

(U  u  u 

O  ^  R 

Jrl  <u  be 

lU  C  O! 

^  «=!  t^ 

P  ^ 

6  M 


i^  ^-p-5  6 


bco    p-t^    i)    a;  .5  13 


<u 


t3  -C  ^    a;    c3  ^  .5    o 

<L>  Cu     •  "r  73  ^  be,iH 

t^         ^^    S    o  a>  ^ 

be    •    be  oj  j2  c  "S 

03    »;5    v7  be  -^  o 

^  .in  rt  ••  •£  c  ^  ^ 

drl  ^>;ttH03OH^ 

M   f^-S  PQ    u^   2^  £    U 


be 
c 

'c 
a 

<v 
S 

-u 

O 


PRIMORDIUM     DEVELOPMENT  163 

This  1  have  called  stage  2.  At  stage  3  the  anlage  has  become  some- 
what longer  and  the  ciha  are  clearly  visible  in  it  but  they  have  not 
attained  their  final  length.  Even  so,  as  Johnson  observed,  the  cilia 
begin  beating  on  their  first  appearance,  at  first  slowly  and  without 
coordination.  Oral  cilia  then  attain  their  definitive  length,  and 
transverse  stripes  in  the  rift  indicate  the  formation  of  membranelles 
which  now  beat  slowly  but  in  metachronal  rhythm.  The  membran- 
elles are  at  first  very  close  together  and  they  will  produce  a 
membranellar  band  longer  than  the  primordium  as  the  distance 
between  them  later  increases  (Stevens,  1903;  Schwartz,  1935). 

As  now  deployed,  there  runs  immediately  to  the  right  of  the 
membranellar  row  a  pigment  stripe  and  to  the  right  of  this  a  clear 
band  (the  border  stripe  of  Schuberg),  and  further  to  the  right 
another  pigment  stripe,  which  three  will  form  the  border  stripes 
of  the  frontal  field.  In  the  meantime,  in  an  extensive  area  to  the 
right  of  these,  considerable  stripe  multiplication  has  usually 
occurred  with  formation  of  many  kinetics  separated  by  very  fine 
granular  stripes,  as  Moxon  first  noted.  It  is  these  fine  stripes  which 
will  form  the  new  frontal  field,  as  well  as  the  lining  of  the  buccal 
pouch  and  of  the  gullet  in  part.  At  stage  5  the  posterior  end  of  the 
anlage  enlarges  a  bit  and  begins  to  make  a  sharp  bend  to  the  right 
in  the  initiation  of  mouthparts  formation.  A  spiraling  ingrowth  of 
the  end  of  the  primordium  forms  the  gullet  (stage  6).  In  this 
invagination  the  terminal  membranelles  are  carried  down  inside 
the  cell,  as  well  as  the  posterior  ends  of  the  fine  striping,  and 
shortly  a  gullet  lined  with  bright  refringent  oral  cilia  and  pigmented 
ectoplasm  is  produced.  It  seems  Hkely  that  there  are  some  further 
additions  at  this  time  to  produce  the  complete  lining  of  the  gullet, 
but  this  is  not  known  for  sure. 

At  stage  7  the  ectoplasm  adjacent  to  the  membranellar  band  and 
just  forward  of  the  spiral  gullet  begins,  in  coeriileiis,  to  depress 
and  form  the  oral  pouch  as  the  anlage  starts  shifting  into  its  final 
position.  With  further  development  the  entire  anlage  moves  into 
its  final  position,  carrying  the  new  stripes  with  it  as  the  enclosed 
frontal  field  (stage  8).  In  this  migration  the  primordium  which  at 
mid-stage  was  roughly  parallel  to  the  lateral  striping  comes  to 
assume  a  position  at  right  angles  to  it  and  this  may  involve  cutting 
and  shifting  of  stripes,  as  Moxon  remarked,  as  well  as  compen- 
sating growth  in  length  of  the  stripes  below  the  new  mouthparts 


164  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

(Schwartz,  1935).  As  the  two  ends  of  the  new  membranellar  band 
approach  each  other  the  enclosed  fine  stripes  are  bent  into  arcs  in 
the  frontal  field. 

There  are  certain  modifications  of  the  primordium  in  different 
types  of  morphogenesis.  Speaking  teleologically,  the  primordium 
in  reorganization  needs  only  to  replace  the  original  mouthparts 
which  will  be  dissolved,  and,  as  Schwartz  emphasized,  there  is 
accordingly  less  multiplication  of  fine  stripes  than  in  either 
division  or  regeneration.  In  dividers  the  anlage,  already  at  stage-2, 
may  appear  semicircular  as  its  anterior  end  also  bends  to  the  right 
and  cuts  across  lateral  striping,  and  stripe  multiplication  may  be 
observed  along  both  ends  (see  Fig.  15A).  On  the  contrary,  in 
regenerators  and  reorganizers  the  anterior  end  of  the  primordium 
usually  runs  straight  forward  to  the  anterior  pole  or  to  a  pre- 
existing adoral  membranellar  band.  The  D-shaped  primordium 
is  usually  diagnostic  of  dividing  animals.  All  primordia  begin  in 
stage  I  at  the  same  site  and  level  of  the  cell.  This  was  remarked  in 
reference  to  regenerators  and  reorganizers  by  Johnson.  My  im- 
pression is  that  it  is  also  true  of  dividers,  Weisz  (1951b)  to  the 
contrary. 

Earlier  students  of  Stentor  in  the  heyday  of  the  recapitulation 
theory  saw  an  evolutionary  significance  in  the  lateral  origin  of  the 
oral  primordium  in  stentors.  Both  Schuberg  (1890)  and  Johnson 
(1893)  regarded  this  as  a  return  to  a  more  primitive  design  in 
heterotrichous  ciliates.  Spirostomum,  presumably  more  primitive, 
retains  the  lateral  disposition  of  the  membranellar  band  and 
resembles  regenerating  stentors  in  stage  6.  In  Fabrea  the  mouth- 
parts  would  be  shifted  half-way  forward  from  their  original 
posterior  location  having  the  appearance  of  stage  7  in  stentors. 
In  Stentor  itself  they  would  eventually  achieve  the  wholly  anterior 
disposition.  Finally,  in  Folliculinids  the  highest  development 
would  be  achieved,  in  which  there  is  an  enormous  extension  of 
the  membranellar  band  in  two  folds  projecting  outward  from  the 
anterior  end. 

2.  Primordium  development  under  abnormal  conditions 

Such  is  the  normal  development  of  the  oral  primordium  so  far 
as  we  now  know.  Its  behavior  under  unusual  circumstances  may 
give  us  some  insight  into  the  processes  involved  (Tartar,  1958b). 


PRIMORDIUM    DEVELOPMENT  165 

First,  multiplication  of  lateral  striping  is  not  essential  for  anlagen 
formation,  as  shown  when  a  large  regenerator,  for  example, 
induces  the  precipitous  formation  of  a  reorganization  primordium 
in  a  small,  non-differentiating  animal  grafted  to  it.  An  anlage 
appears  which  cuts  across  several  stripes  which  show  no  splitting 
whatever  and  an  extensive  presumptive  frontal  field  is  not  pro- 
duced (see  Fig.  34B).  Dissociability  of  stripe  multiplication  and 
membranellar  band  formation  is  further  indicated  by  the  reciprocal 
process  of  induced  primordium  resorption;  for  when  this  occurs 
the  new  band  disappears  entirely  but  there  is  no  regression  of  the 
newly-multiplied  fine  stripes  and  ciliary  rows  which  then  contrast 
sharply  with  the  neighboring  stripes  remaining  (Fig.  34A). 
When  a  newly  forming  membranellar  band  is  caused  to  be  shed 
by  treatment  with  salt  solutions  at  a  relatively  late  stage  in  anlage 
development,  the  multiplied  fine  striping  can  still  be  moved  for- 
ward to  form  a  new  frontal  field,  indicating  that  these  stripes  are 
not  merely  shifted  passively  by  the  migrating  adoral  band  (Fig.  41B). 

The  disposition  of  the  original  anlage  rift  at  stage  i  is  not 
rigidly  fixed.  It  may  run  almost  perpendicular  to  the  striping  or 
its  course  may  sometimes  be  considerably  canted  at  about  30°  to 
the  striping.  In  one  case  it  slanted  downward  instead  of  upward 
though  this  did  not  interfere  with  normal  oral  formation  (Fig.  41  a). 
The  primordium  opening  need  not  cut  across  the  lateral  striping 
at  all.  Thus  Stevens  (1903)  observed  that  in  longitudinal  half 
fragments  the  anlage  appears  in  the  line  of  heal  which  runs  from 
pole  to  pole.  But  this  type  of  development  is.  shown  most  clearly 
when  the  primordium,  excised  from  a  regenerating  animal,  is 
replaced  at  once.  The  line  of  heal,  at  first  tightly  closed,  opens  to 
permit  the  formation  of  a  new  primordium  entirely  parallel  to 
the  striping  (see  Fig.  34B).  Since  such  specimens  were  already  in 
regeneration,  the  new  anlage  develops  very  rapidly  and  there  is 
apparently  insufficient  time  for  stripe  multiplication.  After  stage  6, 
posterior  ends  of  such  replacing  primordia  curl  to  the  right, 
cutting  through  some  of  the  relatively  large  preexisting  stripes 
which  are  carried  forward  to  form  new  frontal  fields  of  abnormal 
appearance. 

The  primordium  need  not  develop  as  a  unit  or  single  entity 
from  the  start.  When  through  abortive  fission  a  head-like  struc- 
ture remains  athwart  the  primordium  site,  anlage  development 


1 66 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Fig.  41.   Abnormal  primordium  developments  {S.  coeruleus). 

A.  Anlage  slanting  in  direction  opposite  from  the  normal, 
satisfactory  reorganization  nevertheless  accomplished. 

B.  Stage-5  divider  treated  with  dilute  sea  water  to  cause 
shedding  of  membranellar  band  and  all  but  posterior  end  of  the 
division  primordium.  Though  the  posterior  daughter  formed 
only  a  gullet,  this  organelle  and  the  multiplied  striping  of  the 
prospective    frontal    field    moved    anteriorly    to    their    normal 

positions.    Both  cells  then  regenerated. 


PRIMORDIUM    DEVELOPMENT  167 

C.  Stage-4  divider  transected  and  posterior  fragment  dis- 
carded. In  continued  ''division"  the  anterior  half  of  the  anlage 
was  shifted  to  the  posterior  end  of  the  anterior  fragment,  later 
moving  forward  and  forming  a  crescent  of  membranelles.  After 
the  mouthparts  were  excised,  a  regeneration  primordium 
appeared  which  bridged  the  interrupting  crescent.  A  nearly 
normal  animal  was  regenerated  (though  with  an  extra  tube  in  the 
frontal  field)  either  by  resorption  of  the  crescent  or  its  incorpora- 
tion into  the  new  membranellar  band. 

D.  Island  primordia  formed  when  post-oral  sector  was  reversed 
180°.  Anlagen  formation  on  both  sides  of  the  patch.  Islands  of 
membranelles  joined  with  each  other  and  with  the  second 
primordium  but  complete  mouthparts  were  not  formed.  After 
several  transformations  the  specimen  eventually  became  normal. 

E.  Capacity  for  erosion  of  ectoplasm  shown  in  narrow-loop 
primordium.  Graft  of  4  coeruleiis  produced  one  normal,  one 
ring-  and  one  loop-primordium.  Enlarged  view  of  latter  in 
second  sketch  shows  "erosion",  lifting  and  buckling  of  ecto- 
plasmic  striping  enclosed  within  the  membranellar  band,  leading 
eventually  to   the   separation   of  a   bleb   of  ectoplasm.     Only 

membranelles  and  oral  pouch  were  formed 

F.  Etching  of  clear  band  alongside  an  oral  primordium.  a: 
Stage-4  reorganizer  (anterior)  grafted  in  tandem  with  a  stage- 1 
regenerator,  b:  Anlagen  synchronized  at  stage-5,  interrupted  by 
oral  remnant  of  the  regenerator  and  stomatogenesis  confined  to 
the  posterior  primordium.  c:  Oral  remnant  either  resorbed  or 
incorporated.  Clear  band  to  right  of  primordium,  apparently 
from  dissolving  of  ectoplasmic  structures,  permits  viewing 
through  the  interior  of  the  cell  with  its  food  vacuoles  to  the 
ectoplasm  on  the  far  side.   An  elongated  singlet  produced  which 

soon  reorganized  with  two  anlagen. 

G.  Dissolving  of  ectoplasmic  striping  in  presumptive  oral 
region  {x)  at  stage  5 — observed  in  experimental  animals  but  may  be 
an  exaggeration  of  a  normal  process  preceding  oral  invagination. 

H.   Divider  in   stage   2   transected   through  the   anlage   and 

halves  rotated.    Essentially  there  v/as  no  growth  in  length  of  the 

sections  of  the  primordium,  as  if  blocked  by  abutting  stripes. 

Oral   differentiation  w^as  incomplete   in   both   halves,    but   the 

original  mouthparts  incurred  reorganizational  resorption. 

I.  Development  of  a  V-shaped  primordium.  These  are 
formed  in  addition  to  the  host  primordium  when  a  fine  stripe 
sector  {x)  is  implanted  into  the  back  of  a  regenerator.  The  point 
of  the  V  invaginates  to  form  a  good  cytostome  and  gullet  though 
two  membranellar  bands  are  involved.  Resorption  of  subtended 
portion  of  old  peristome  permits  entrance  of  new  fine  stripes  into 
the  frontal  field. 

M 


1 68 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


J.  Development  of  a  loop  primordium.  To  a  stage-3  divider 
was  grafted  a  stage-2  regeneration  primordium.  As  shown  in 
first  sketch,  the  host  anlage  is  developed  to  stage  5  and  the 
implanted  primordium  extended  to  form  two  parallel  memhra- 
nellar  bands  separated  by  only  a  single  stripe.  The  specimen 
divided,  with  the  loop  primordium  going  to  the  proter,  resorbing 
one  of  the  bands  and  forming  no  mouthparts  but  only  a  curl. 

K.  Polarity  in  early  stage-4  primordium.  Mid-section  was 
reversed  in  situ.  Parts  did  not  rejoin,  as  when  merely  transected, 
but  developed  separately. 


PRIMORDIUM    DEVELOPMENT  169 

may  occur  both  above  and  below  it  with  a  single  mouth  produced 
only  in  the  lower  segment  (Fig.  41c).  In  one  unusual  instance,  in 
which  the  cell  was  cut  in  two  longitudinally  and  the  halves  rotated 
180°  on  each  other,  an  adventitious  primordium  appeared  first  as  a 
series  of  islands  of  oral  cilia  which  later  connected  to  produce  a 
good  membranellar  band  though  mouthparts  were  not  formed  (d). 
These  cases  suggest  that  primordium  formation  is  the  result  of 
local  episodes  of  elaboration  along  its  length  rather  than  a 
differentiation  proceeding  from  a  single  center. 

Other  observations  indicate  that  dissolving  or  etching  of  formed 
parts  may  be  involved  in  the  later  stages  of  primordium  develop- 
ment, as  if  in  this  way  space  is  provided  for  the  evolving  parts. 
Thus  in  Bursaria  truncatella  (Schmahl,  1926)  and  in  Condylostoma 
magnum  (Tartar,  1941b)  the  oral  groove  seems  to  be  scooped  out  of 
the  cytoplasm  by  an  active  process  of  dissolution.  Something  like 
this  was  seen  in  the  development  of  an  unusual  stentor  primordium 
in  the  form  of  a  pinched  ring.  The  enclosed  striping  was  dissolved 
and  cut  out  as  a  pendent  tongue  of  cytoplasm  (e).  In  two  cases  the 
breakdown  or  dissolving  of  ectoplasmic  structures  along  the  whole 
length  of  the  primordium  was  conspicuous,  and  one  of  these  is 
shown  (f).  This  was  in  a  tandem  graft  of  two  Stentor  coeruleus  in 
which,  at  stage  6  in  development  of  the  joined  primordium,  a  wide 
break  in  the  striping  was  seen  to  the  right  so  that  one  could  clearly 
see  through  the  transparent  plasma  membrane  into  the  cell  interior, 
and  the  gap  was  later  covered  by  scattered  pigment  granules  not  in 
rows.  This  may  have  been  an  exaggerated  picture  of  what  happens 
when  a  place  is  provided  for  the  clear  border  stripe  to  the  right  of 
the  membranellar  band,  as  well  as  a  demonstration  that  pigment 
granules  tend  to  invade  any  open  or  unstructured  area  of  ectoplasm. 
The  case  is  also  reminiscent  of  normal  events  in  primordium 
formation  in  Folliculina^  already  mentioned,  in  which  a  gape  or 
spreading  of  the  longitudinal  striping  to  a  distance  of  15/x  occurs. 
When  primordium  formation  occurs  without  stripe  multiplication 
there  is  sometimes  the  appearance  at  stage  5  of  a  dissolving  of  the 
ectoplasm  near  the  posterior  end  of  the  anlage  (g)  and  this  might 
be  regarded  as  a  localized  etching  of  the  structured  cortex  to  permit 
the  inward  invagination  of  the  anlage  in  gullet  formation. 

Lengthening  of  the  primordium  can  be  blocked  by  incompatible 
striping.  Thus  when  cell  and  primordium  were  cut  transversely 


170  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

and  the  anterior  half  of  the  stentor  rotated  180°  on  the  posterior, 
there  was  no  extension  of  the  primordium  from  the  cut  end  and 
very  short  membranellar  bands  were  produced  (h).  This  suggests 
that  increase  in  length  occurs  in  all  parts  of  the  primordium  and 
not  merely  at  its  ends. 

When  the  stripe  pattern  is  abnormal  after  certain  grafting 
operations  V-shaped  and  even  looped  primordia  may  be  formed 
(Fig.  41,  I  and  j).  The  former  can  produce  mouthparts  of  normal 
appearance,  and  the  latter  make  an  attempt  to  do  so,  though  the 
conditions  for  invaginations  are  certainly  quite  atypical. 

These  and  other  types  of  oral  development  show  that  cyto- 
differentiation  is  not  so  delicately  precise  a  process  that  inter- 
ferences cannot  be  surmounted.  They  also  demonstrate  the 
important  point  made  by  Driesch  that  the  same  result  in  organic 
development  can  be  achieved  by  several  routes,  even  exceeding  the 
usual  experience  of  the  organism. 

3.  Determination,  or  the  progressive  specification  of  the 
oral  anlage 

Only  early-stage  anlagen  are  resorbable  (Weisz,  1956;  Tartar, 
1958c).  Stage  3  appears  to  be  the  time  of  transition,  after  which 
oral  primordia  become  self  developing  systems  resistant  to  resorp- 
tive  influences,  though  some  early  stage-4  anlagen,  not  actually 
resorbed,  developed  astomatously  or  with  incomplete  mouthparts. 
Weisz  cut  off  the  tails  of  late  dividers  including  the  posterior  end 
of  the  primordium  and  found  that  the  anlage  then  produced  no 
mouthparts.  Similarly,  Lund  (19 17),  working  with  Bursaria 
truncatella,  stated  that  minor  injury  to  the  anlage  of  the  gullet  did 
not  prevent  development  of  the  oral  primordium  but  led  to 
abnormality  in  the  oral  structures  produced.  He  concluded  that 
"  there  appears  to  exist  in  the  anlage  of  the  gullet  a  definite  part 
which  corresponds  to  a  definite  structure  in  the  fully  differentiated 
gullet  ". 

These  isolated  indications  led  to  a  comprehensive  demonstration 
on  the  cell  level  of  something  very  much  like  the  determination 
of  parts  in  developing  embryos  (Tartar,  1957c).  It  is  well  known 
that  embryonic  anlagen  are  at  first  modifiable  but  later  not.  This 
developmental  principle  seems  to  be  simply  a  statement  that  once 
a  complex  is  well  underway  it  cannot  be  modified  and  there  is  no 


PRIMORDIUM    DEVELOPMENT  171 

turning  back,  which  is  a  rather  universal  generalization;  yet  in 
the  development  of  the  relatively  new  science  of  biology  it  was 
very  important  to  find  that  the  elaboration  of  the  organism  is  not 
magical  and  immutable  but  is  a  process  which  occurs  in  time  and 
is  subject  to  some  analysis  by  operative  manipulations.  In  many 
respects  it  can  be  shown  that  this  principle  also  appHes  to  Stentor. 

First  we  shall  discuss  deletion  experiments  on  the  oral  primor- 
dium.  Minimal  excisions  of  parts  of  the  oral  primordium,  always 
necessarily  including  some  of  the  surrounding  ectoplasm  and 
endoplasm,  were  performed  on  regenerating  stentors  in  stages  4 
and  5  when  the  membranellar  band  is  already  well  formed  but  there 
is  still  no  visible  indication  whatever  of  developing  mouthparts. 
When  the  anterior  halves  of  such  anlagen  were  removed,  develop- 
ment continued  and  complete  mouthparts  were  formed  but  the 
membranellar  band  was  only  half  its  normal  length  (Fig.  42A). 
Re-regeneration  then  occurred  about  a  day  later  to  produce  a  set 
of  feeding  organelles  in  normal  proportion  to  the  size  of  the  cell. 
If  the  posterior  half  or  third  of  the  primordium  was  excised,  only  a 
considerable  length  of  membranellar  band  was  produced  and  no 
mouthparts  at  all,  with  re-regeneration  now  following  sooner  (b). 
Extensive  removal  of  all  but  the  posterior  end  of  the  anlage  could 
lead  to  formation  of  a  perfect  set  of  mouthparts  without  any 
membranellar  band  at  all  (c) ;  and  removal  of  only  the  posterior 
tip,  at  stage  5  or  early  stage  6,  resulted  in  complete  absence  of  the 
gullet  although  oral  pouch  and  membranellar  band  were  normal  (d). 
Finally,  by  removing  a  penultimate  section  of  the  anlage  at  stage  5 
it  w^as  possible  to  produce  heads  in  which  a  normal  gullet  termin- 
ated the  membranellar  band  but  the  oral  pouch  was  missing 
entirely  (e).  Therefore,  it  is  clear  that  by  stage  4  the  oral  anlage  is 
determined  and  any  ablation  of  its  parts  results  in  corresponding 
deletions  in  the  organelles  formed. 

The  same  operations  were  then  performed  on  early  primordia. 
Even  when  extensive  sections  of  the  anlage  were  removed,  the  lack 
was  then  compensated  by  additions  to  the  primordium,  increasing 
it  to  its  normal  length,  and  conlplete,  proportionate  feeding 
organelles  w^ere  produced  (f).  At  stage  3  some  specimens  showed 
corresponding  defects  while  others  did  not,  so  that  it  may  be 
concluded  that  fixity  or  determination  of  the  primordium  occurs 
in  late  stage  3. 


172 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Fig.  42.   Developmental  determination  of  the  oral  primordium. 

Removal  of  portions  of  the  stage-4  anlage  results  in  corres- 
ponding deletions :  A.  Posterior  half  produces  mouthparts  and 
short  membranellar  band.  B.  Anterior  two-thirds  forms  no 
mouthparts,  only  peristome.  C.  Posterior  fourth  forms  only 
gullet  with  opening. 

Removal  of  parts  at  stage  5,  before  stomatogenesis  has  visibly 
begun.  D.  Excision  of  posterior  tip  of  anlage  results  in  absence 
of  gullet  and  cytostome,  only  membranellar  band  and  oral  pouch 
being  formed.  E.  Penultimate  deletion  results  in  absence  of  oral 


PRIMORDIUM    DEVELOPMENT  I73 

Now  it  is  very  suggestive  that  it  is  just  at  this  time  that  the 
primordium  becomes  susceptible  to  sloughing  when  stentors  are 
treated  with  salt  and  other  solutions  (see  p.  253).  This  shedding 
response  indicates  that  the  anlage  has  become  disconnectable  from 
the  surrounding  ectoplasm  and  this  in  turn  suggests  not  only  that 
the  primordium  has  become  an  integrated  unit  but  also  that  it  may 
now  be  isolated  from  morphogenetic  influences  emanating  from 
its  immediate  surroundings.  As  will  be  developed  shortly,  there 
are  strong  indications  that  mouthparts  are  induced  at  the  posterior 
end  of  the  anlage  by  reason  of  its  relationship  to  the  surrounding 
parts  at  the  posterior  end  of  the  cell. 

Parenthetically  it  should  be  noted  that  in  one  salt  treatment  of 
a  stentor  with  a  stage-4  primordium  it  happened  that  only  a 
section  of  the  membranellar  band  in  the  region  of  the  presumptive 
oral  pouch  was  sloughed,  and  again  there  was  formed  a  perfect  set 
of  feeding  organelles  except  that  the  pouch  was  missing.  Since  the 
ectoplasmic  striping  alongside  the  anlage  is  in  these  cases  never 
affected,  it  may  be  assumed  that  the  lining  of  the  presumptive 
pouch  had  not  been  removed.  From  this  it  may  be  inferred  that  a 
certain  section  or  bend  of  the  developing  primordium  induces 
pouch  formation  in  the  adjacent  ectoplasm  on  its  right  and  that 
in  the  absence  of  this  influence  this  material  remains  unaltered. 

Progressive  determination  of  the  oral  primordium  is  also  demon- 
strated by  shifting  its  location  on  the  cell.  When  stage-2  primordia 
were  circumscribed  and  shifted  to  the  anterior  pole  they  developed 
without  forming  mouthparts  (Fig.  43A),  but  when  this  operation 
is  performed  upon  later  anlagen,  oral  development  is  then  complete. 
Early  primordia  shifted  to  the  posterior  end  developed  adequate 
mouthparts  and  a  well-formed  though  somewhat  shortened  mem- 
branellar band  (unpublished).  In  one  case  a  grafted  anlage 
developing  at  the  posterior  pole  even  showed  an  additional  gullet 
formation  (b). 

It   therefore   appears   that   the   normal   surroundings   of  the 


pouch  only,  with  adequate  gullet  attached  to  a  long  peristome. 

F.  Removal  of  large  portions,  whether  anterior  or  posterior,  of 

stage-2  primordium  has  no  eff"ect ;  remaining  section  of  the  anlage 

elongates  and  forms  complete  set  of  feeding  organelles.    (After 

Tartar,  i957c.) 


174 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


posterior  end  of  the  primordium  act  upon  it  to  cause  formation  of 
mouthparts  and  that  when  the  anlage  is  shifted  away  from  this 
environment  such  induction  is  missing.  Later  primordia  in  stage  4 
or  5  have  already  received  this  influence  and  are  then  semi- 
autonomous  systems  capable  of  complete  self-differentiation 
regardless  of  their  surroundings. 


Fig.  43.    Oral  induction  associated  with  the  posterior  pole. 

A.  Stage-2  primordium  of  regenerator  shifted  to  the  anterior 
pole  develops  no  mouthparts  but  only  membranellar  band. 

B.  Stage-3  regeneration  primordium  implanted  heteropolar 
on  a  stage-3  regenerator.  Primordium  patch  slips  to  posterior 
end  where  it  forms  good  mouthparts  and  an  extra  oral  pouch  (y) 

and  gullet  (x)  in  addition. 


4.  Induction  of  mouthparts  formation 

As  just  indicated,  there  is  accumulating  evidence  that  the 
posterior  end  of  the  cell  in  Stentor  has  an  inductive  action  on  the 
end  of  the  developing  membranellar  band  which  causes  it  to 
invaginate  and  form  mouthparts.  Perhaps  the  first  indication  of 
this  relationship  was  in  experiments  in  which  a  sector  bearing  the 
primordium  site  was  reversed  in  situ  and  the  original  mouthparts 
excised  to  initiate  regeneration  (Tartar,  1956b).  An  oral  primor- 
dium then  appeared  in  the  reversed  patch  but  mouthparts  now 
were  formed  at  both  ends  (Fig.  44A).  Formation  of  the  normal 
mouthparts  at  the  original  posterior  end  of  the  anlage  may  be 
regarded  as  due  to  the  influence  of  its  own  surroundings  of 
"posterior"  ectoplasm,  and  that  of  the  additional  formation  at  the 
other  end  as  being  produced  by  an  influence  of  the  adjacent  tail- 
pole,  passing  across  the  graft  and  affecting  the  originally  anterior 
end  of  the  anlage.  This  experiment  has  been  confirmed  by  Uhlig 


PRIMORDIUM    DEVELOPMENT 


175 


Fig.  44.    Stomatogenesis  in  relation  to  the  posterior  pole. 

A.  Primordium  site  reversed  in  situ  and  mouthparts  excised. 
Regeneration  anlage  forms  best  mouthparts  at  its  posterior  end 
(above)  but  oral  formations  are  also  induced  at  the  other  end  by 
adjacent  posterior  pole.  Polarity  of  primordium  prevails  as 
metachronal  beat  of  membranelles  proceeds  from  posterior  to 

anterior  (arrows).    (After  Tartar,  1956b.) 

B.  Wide  stripe  patch  implanted  transversely  in  mid-region 
develops  a  primordium  but  forms  no  mouthparts  as  does  the 
other  anlage  in  the  normal  primordium  site  extending  to  the 

posterior  end.    (After  Tartar,  1956b.) 

C.  Lateral  graft  of  an  extra  tail-pole  induces  abortive  mouth- 

parts formation  in  the  middle  of  the  primordium. 


(1959)  who  emphasized  that  the  symmetry  of  the  induced  mouth  is 
always  that  of  the  inducing  pole,  i.e.,  the  anterior  end  of  the  primor- 
dium shows  a  double  curvature  which  results  in  its  coiling  in  the 
normal  direction.  This  was  also  shown  in  fusion  masses  in  which 
for  some  reason  mouthparts  formed  at  the  "wrong"  end  of  the 
primordium  yet  coiled  in  the  normal  direction  (Tartar,  1954, 
Fig.  11).  The  pattern  of  the  posterior  ectoplasm  therefore  deter- 
mines not  only  that  coiling  and  invagination  shall  occur  but  also 
the  direction  taken.  Uhlig  also  noted  that  in  these  double-ended 
formations  the  original  polarity  is  functionally  dominant,  for  the 
metachronal  beating  of  the  membranelles  originates  at  the  normal 
mouth  and  progresses  without  interruption  to  the  other. 

Several  other  observations  gave  evidence  that  mouth  formation 
depends  on  the  geometric  relationship  of  the  anlage  to  the  topo- 
graphy of  the  cell.  Ectopic  primordia,  developing  in  primordium 
sectors  grafted  transversely  across  the  lateral  striping  of  the  host 
did  not  form  mouthparts  (Fig.  44B).  Sometimes  when  primordium 
sites  or  primordia  were  reversed  in  place  there  was  not  a  bipolar 


176  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

differentiation,  as  described  above,  but  instead  no  mouthparts 
were  formed  at  all.  In  these  cases,  as  in  the  absence  or  incomplete- 
ness of  oral  formation  in  stentors  grafted  in  complex,  random 
orientation,  the  failure  of  oral  differentiation  may  be  attributed  to 
the  mutual  cancellation  of  polar  gradients  (Tartar,  1956b). 

Starting  from  these  impHcations,  Schwartz's  student,  Uhlig 
(1959,  and  unpublished  thesis),  has  pursued  this  matter  in  a 
demonstration  of  morphogenetic  gradients  in  Stentor  coeruleus, 
suggestively  similar  to  those  which  have  been  postulated  for  the 
cleaving  sea  urchin  egg.  To  mention  only  two  of  his  experiments, 
Uhlig  found  consistently  that  when  primordia  were  grafted  trans- 
versely across  the  axis  of  the  cell  they  never  formed  mouthparts, 
suggesting  that  although  the  anlage  arises  in  this  manner  the 
assumption  of  its  later  anterio-posterior  position  is  for  more  than 
*'  historical  "  reasons,  namely,  to  align  it  with  a  morphogenetic 
gradient  which  will  insure  its  complete  and  proper  development. 
He  also  found  that  when  an  extra  tail  pole  was  grafted  laterally 
alongside  a  developing  primordium  this  had  the  effect  of  inducing 
an  additional  if  somewhat  incomplete  formation  in  the  middle  of 
the  anlage  (Fig.  44c).  The  interpretation  that  this  induction  may 
be  due  to  the  operation  of  some  gradient  steepest  at  the  posterior 
pole  will  be  discussed  in  a  later  section  on  polarity  (p.  202). 

Hence  there  is  good  evidence  that  the  oral  anlage  is  induced  to 
form  mouthparts  by  its  normal  surroundings.  Once  this  inter- 
action has  taken  place  and  although  there  are  yet  no  beginnings 
of  mouthparts,  the  primordium  is  then  determined  and  can 
develop  completely  regardless  of  where  it  is  placed. 

5.  Repair,  mending,  and  joining  of  primordia 

The  oral  anlage  can  endure  drastic  cutting  injuries  without 
total  blockage  of  development  (Tartar,  1957c).  For  example,  a 
stage-3  primordium  was  transected  in  many  places  yet  produced 
an  apparently  complete  set  of  feeding  organelles,  though  these 
were  later  replaced  by  a  new  set  (Fig.  45A).  Usually,  however,  this 
operation,  or  the  comparable  one  in  which  the  whole  length  of  the 
anlage  is  slashed  through  several  times  with  the  point  of  a  glass 
needle,  generally  did  not  prevent  the  formation  of  a  good  mem- 
branellar  band  but  the  mouthparts  were  lacking  (b),  especially 
when  later-stage  primordia  were  used.  As  in  continued  develop- 


PRIMORDIUM    DEVELOPMENT 


177 


Fig.  45.    Rejoining  in  oral  primordia. 

A.  After  cross-cuts,  a:  Stage-3  primordium  of  a  divider 
transected  6  times,  b:  Anlage  continues  developing  in  normal 
time,  severed  parts  rejoining  as  the  animal  reorganizes  instead 
of  dividing,    c:  Perfect  but  tiny  mouthparts  formed,  possibly 


178  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

ment  after  deletion  of  parts,  these  tests  show  that  the  oral  primor- 
dium  need  not  be  complete  or  remain  always  continuous  for  the 
full  differentiation  of  its  separate  parts. 

It  is  equally  clear  that  in  these  interrupted  primordia  there  is  a 
strong  tendency  for  the  parts  to  rejoin.  This  association  is  perhaps 
best  shown  by  tandem  grafts  in  which  the  ends  of  two  separate 
primordia  were  made  approximate  (unpublished).  Two  stentors 
could  be  grafted  together  in  homopolar  telobiosis  without  any 
disturbance  of  the  lateral  striping  or  injury  to  the  primordia,  which 
were  brought  into  alignment.  In  almost  every  case  in  which  the 
anlagen  were  in  mid-stage  development,  they  fused  together  as  a 
continuous  membranellar  band  (c).  A  complete  set  of  mouthparts 
was  formed  only  at  the  posterior  end,  although  almost  always  at 
the  point  of  joining  there  appeared  an  accessory  oral  pouch  (see 
also  Fig.  4 if). 

We  have  therefore  learned  much  of  how  the  oral  primordium 
develops  under  both  normal  and  abnormal  conditions,  but  how 
the  precise  and  elaborate  feeding  organelles  are  guided  to  their 
perfection  remains  a  mystery. 


because  one  section   (x)  which  may  have  been  pushed  into 
heteropolar  orientation  was  not  incorporated. 

B.  After  splitting,  a:  Stage-5  reorganizer  with  anlage  sliced 
through  three  times,  b:  Reorganization  proceeds,  and  a  well- 
formed  membranellar  band  is  produced  but  no  mouthparts.  c: 
Specimen  regenerating  because  differentiation  was  incomplete. 

C.  Joining  of  tandem  primordia.  a:  Tandem  graft  of  two 
stage-3  regenerators  cut  just  beyond  the  ends  of  the  primordia. 
b:  Anlage  join  though  not  originally  touching,  development 
continues,  and  a  space  clear  of  lateral  striping  (x)  develops 
alongside  as  in  Fig.  4 if.  c:  Complete  mouthparts  formed  only 
at  posterior  end,  only  an  extra  oral  pouch  (y)  being  produced  at 

mid-level.    (After  Tartar,  1957c,  in  part.) 


CHAPTER    X 

THE    PRIMORDIUM    IN    RELATION 
TO    THE    STRIPE   PATTERN 

We  return  now  to  the  site  of  the  primordium  to  learn  what 
pecuHarity  this  region  may  have  that  it  should  serve  as  the  place 
where  the  new  feeding  organelles  always  normally  originate. 

I.  Nature  of  the  normal  primordium  site 

Schuberg  in  1890  had  already  described  a  special  geometry  for 
this  area  which  he  called  the  ramifying  zone.  There  he  noted 
especially  that  the  lateral  striping  does  not  run  all  the  way  to  the 
posterior  pole  and  his  figures  clearly  and  correctly  show  that  in 
this  region  the  granular  stripes  are  the  narrowest  of  any  on  the  cell 
and  the  ciliary  rows  correspondingly  close  together.  Causin  (1931) 
and  others  have  clearly  seen  and  depicted  these  differences  in  the 
striping  but  it  is  not  uncommon  to  find  pictures  of  Stentor  which 
completely  ignore  this  distinction.  That  the  oral  primordium 
always  appears  at  a  definite  position  on  the  cell  was  Schuberg's 
main  point.  It  soon  became  apparent  that  the  narrow  granular 
stripes  are  found  in  the  region  posterior  to  the  mouth  because  the 
wide  stripes  to  the  left  have  been  split  to  permit  the  interpolation 
of  new  clear  stripes  with  their  kinetics  and  attendant  structures. 
The  primordium  site  is  thus  also  the  region  of  stripe  multiplication, 
and  indeed  both  processes  run  simultaneously  during  anlage 
formation 

Morphologically,  the  ventral  area  may  be  characterized  as  the 
place  where  the  oldest  and  broadest  granular  stripes  meet  the 
newest  and  narrowest  in  a  locus  of  sharply  contrasting  stripe 
widths.  This  asymmetry  of  the  lateral  striping  is  found  in  all 
species  of  Stentor.  That  the  kinetics  are  not  equidistant  in  other 
ciliates,  and  close  together  in  the  region  of  oral  formation,  may  be 
the  case  in  some,  though  this  is  by  no  means  obvious.  In  the  related 
Folliculina,  Faure-Fremiet  (1932)  could  find  no  ramifying  zone 

179 


l8o  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

and  described  the  pigmented  stripes  as  not  being  graded  in  width. 
Yet  in  Paramecium  the  oral  anlage  does  appear  near  the  junction 
of  two  differently  patterned  areas  (Ehret  and  Powers,  1959). 

2.  Production  of  supernumerary  primordia 

If  the  crucial  feature  of  the  primordium  site  lies  in  something 
correlated  with  the  visible  appearance  of  contrast  between  wide 
and  narrow  granular  stripes,  then  it  should  be  possible  to  elicit 
primordium  formations  in  atypical  loci  by  creating  such  areas  of 
contrast  by  operative  manipulation.  This  has  proved  to  be  the  case, 
for  a  wide  spectrum  of  experiments  has  shown  that  primordia 
appear  wherever  and  however  wide-  and  narrow-stripe  areas  of 
the  ectoplasm  come  together  to  create  a  locus  of  sharp  contrast  in 
stripe  widths  (Tartar,  1956a,  b,  c). 

First  it  was  shown  that  the  primordium  site  need  not  be  in  the 
normal  position  in  order  to  produce  an  anlage  and  that  a  single 
animal  or  simple  coeruleus  graft  complex  can  produce  and  develop 
more  than  one  oral  primordium.  Thus  when  an  extra  primordium 
site  cut  from  one  stentor,  and  not  necessarily  carrying  any  macro- 
nuclear  nodes,  was  grafted  into  the  back  of  another  animal  and 
regeneration  induced  by  excising  the  mouthparts,  anlagen  appeared 
simultaneously  in  both  normal  and  ectopic  sites  and  a  doublet  or 
bistomial  stentor  was  always  produced  (Fig.  46A).  It  was  then 
found  that  when  only  the  sector  characterized  by  fine  pigment 
stripes  in  which  the  primordium  first  appears  at  stage  i  is 
implanted,  an  extra  primordium  still  appears  and  it  forms  on  the 
side  of  the  graft  where  the  narrowest  stripes  of  the  implant  lie 
adjacent  to  wide  stripes  of  the  host  (b).  If  such  a  patch  was  reversed 
and  implanted  heteropolar  the  extra  primordium  then  appeared 
on  the  other  side  where  the  contrast  in  stripe  widths  was  now  the 
greatest  (c).  This  anlage  soon  assumed  the  polarity  of  the  host,  but 
on  forming  the  gullet  the  posterior  end  curled  to  the  left  instead 
of  the  right  and  an  incompletely  developed  set  of  mouthparts  of 
reversed  asymmetry  was  produced.  In  the  controls  in  which  sectors 
bearing  wide  stripes  were  grafted  into  the  back,  or  wide  stripe 
area,  no  extra  primordium  formation  occurred. 

Taken  together,  these  experiments  are  enlightening.  The  suture 
as  such,  produced  by  grafting,  is  not  the  cause  of  anlagen  forma- 
tion. Instead  oral  differentiation  occurs  onlv  if  and  where  an  area 


PRIMORDIUM    IN    RELATION    TO    STRIPE    PATTERN    l8l 

characterized  by  fine  striping  lies  adjacent  to  an  area  bearing  wide 
stripes.  The  fine  stripes  need  not  be  to  the  right  of  the  wide,  as  is 
normally  the  case,  but  can  lie  to  the  left  in  an  arrangement  which 
is  just  as  effective.  Yet  in  the  reverse  arrangement  the  direction  of 
coiling  is  reversed,  as  if  the  anlage  always  bends  away  from  the 
wide  stripes  and  into  the  fine,  even  though  this  results  in  a  primor- 
dium  of  reversed  asymmetry.  And  finally,  it  is  evident  that  the 
wide-  and  fine-stripe  areas  are  able  to  interact  even  though 
heteropolar. 

One  of  the  most  convincing  demonstrations  of  the  correlation 
between  primordium  formation  and  locus  of  contrasting  stripe 
widths  (l.s.c.)  was  provided  by  splitting  the  fine  line  area  of  the 
primordium  site  by  introducing  a  narrow  sector  bearing  wide 
stripes.  Now  there  were  three  loci  of  stripe  contrast,  the  original 
primordium  site  and  on  each  side  of  the  implanted  patch,  and  on 
regeneration  three  anlagen  were  produced,  one  in  each  Ls.c.(d). 
In  further  development  the  two  primordia  on  the  left  usually 
joined  to  form  a  V-shaped  anlage  which  might  not  form  mouth- 
parts.  It  should  be  added  that  control  tests  showed  that  neither  a 
mere  splitting  of  the  fine-line  zone  nor  the  implantation  there  of 
an  additional  fine-line  sector  had  the  effect  of  producing  super- 
numerary primordium  formations. 

Many  other  types  of  graft  were  made  to  produce  juxtapositions 
of  wide-  and  fine-stripe  areas  in  all  possible  combinations,  and 
these  are  also  illustrated  in  Fig.  46.  They  showed  that  primordium 
formation  is  always  correlated  with  this  juxtaposition  but  is 
independent  of  the  orientation  of  the  striping;  for  in  addition  to 
the  modifications  already  mentioned,  the  contrasting  stripes  may 
lie  at  right  angles,  or  abut  end  to  end  homopolar  or  heteropolar. 
This  shows  not  only  that  the  two  types  of  area  can  interact  regard- 
less of  orientation  but  also  implies  that  the  developing  oral  cilia 
and  their  kinetosomes  are  autonomous  in  their  precise  alignment 
into  membranelles,  because  normal  membranellar  bands  were 
always  produced  regardless  of  the^  disposition  of  the  adjacent 
ectoplasmic  striping.  For  example,  when  anterior  halves  of 
regenerators  were  rotated  180°  on  their  posterior  halves  (g) 
membranellar  differentiation  which  was  to  all  appearances  normal 
occurred  at  the  new  l.s.c.  where  the  lateral- striping  lay  at  right 
angles  to  the  primordium  instead  of  roughly  parallel  to  it. 


1 82 


THE  BIOLOGY  OF  STENTOR 


tiilll    Ipii    liiHlt    Isfii    lii  ^   li 

lii    lill!  ilil  ^iiiiiiiii!  liiiii  tm  m 


Fig.  46.  Experiments  establishing  empirical  correlation  between 
primordium  formation  and  loci  of  stripe-width  contrast. 

A.  Sector  bearing  primordium  site  grafted  into  back  of  the 
host.    On  excision  of  mouthparts,  primordia  are  formed  both  in 

the  host's  and  in  the  implanted  site. 

B.  Sector  of  fine-stripe  grafted   into  wide-stripe   area  pro- 
duces extra  regeneration  primordium  on  the  side  with  the  finest 

stripes. 


PRIMORDIUM    IN    RELATION    TO    STRIPE    PATTERN    183 

Such  cases  also  illustrate  another  point.  In  the  normal  primor- 
dium  site  the  anlage  appears  in  and  across  the  fine-stripe  area  near 
that  part  of  the  cell  which  carries  the  broadest  pigment  stripes. 
Broad  and  fine  stripes  as  well  as  the  kinetics  between  them  are  of 
course  homopolar  and  presumably  in  intimate  continuity  since  the 
wide-stripe  zone  is  continually  transforming  into  the  fine-line  zone 
by  stripe  sphtting.  If  there  is  interaction  between  the  two  areas, 
this  would  seem  to  be  an  action  at  a  distance  and  not  something 

C.  Same,  implanted  heteropolar.  The  anlage  now  forms  on 
the  other  side  where  the  stripe  contrast  is  greatest.  Initially,  the 
ectopic  anlage  bends  at  its  posterior  end,  but  later  the  polarity 
of  host  predominates  and  mouthparts  are  induced  at  the  other 

end,  incomplete  and  of  reversed  asymmetry. 

D.  Fine-line  zone  of  host  split  by  an  implanted  sector  of  wide 
striping.  Three  anlagen  are  formed  in  correspondence  to  the 
three  loci  of  stripe  contrast :  one  in  the  host  primordium  site  {x) 
and  one  on  each  side  of  the  graft.   Adjacent  anlagen  join  to  form 

V-primordium  which  may  or  may  not  produce  mouthparts. 

E.  Pair  of  stentors  grafted  by  wound  surfaces  from  removal 
of  the  heads  develop  primordia  in  the  normal  sites  but  extending 
around  the  suture  where  wide  abut  narrow  stripes  in  heteropolar 

orientation. 

F.  Head  of  one  stentor  replaced  by  fine-line  zone  of  another, 
grafted  at  90°.    Anlage  extends  from  primordium  site  into  the 

newly  created  l.s.c. 

G.  Anterior  half  rotated  180'  on  posterior.  Anlagen  appear 
in  separated  halves  of  the  primordium  site  and  are  joined  by 
extension  which  may  run  halfway  around  the  specimen  where 

wide  stripes  abut  fine  stripes  end-to-end. 
H.    Left  half  rotated  180°  on  right.    First  sketch  shows  anlage 
formed  in  normal  primordium  site  and  extended  to  new  l.s.c. 
where  fine  stripes  meet  wide-stripe  area  of  the  other  half.  Second 
drawing  shows  third  primordium  induction  in  minor  l.s.c. 
produced  on  the  opposite  side. 
I.    Wide-stripe  patch  implanted  transversely  into  fine-line 
zone  of  host  develops  an  extra  primordium,  which  however  forms 
no  mouthparts,  probably  because  too  distant  from  posterior  pole. 
J.     Aboral   half,    folded   upon   itself,    develops   regeneration 
primordium  where  the  widest  stripes  lie  next  to  their  narrowing 
prolongations. 
K.      Summary    diagrams    showing    primordium    formation 
(indicated   by  bar)   to   be   correlated   with   loci   of  contrasting 
pigment  stripe  widths  but  independent  of  the  orientation  of 
those  stripes.    (After  Tartar,  1956a,  b.) 


f^y^-  «o4nv. 


184  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

immediately  taking  place  between  the  materials  of  the  "  last  " 
fine  stripe  and  the  **  first  "  wide  stripe.  In  certain  graft  combina- 
tions one  obtains  what  may  be  called  the  locus  of  stripe  contrast 
in  the  strict  sense  of  the  term.  For  instance  when  the  anterior  half 
is  rotated  on  the  posterior,  wide  stripes  abut  fine  stripes  but 
careful  examination  shows  that  wide  and  narrow  bands  do  not  fuse 
together  even  though  they  are  homopolar,  and  this  may  also  be 
true  of  the  associated  ciliary  rows.  In  heteropolar  telobiotics  (e)  it 
is  even  more  obvious  and  probable  that  joining  does  not  occur,  as 
a  definite  suture  persists.  When  patches  are  grafted  parabiotically 
but  in  reverse  orientation,  the  fact  that  they  usually  retain  their 
original  polarities  and  slip  on  or  creep  away  from  each  other,  is 
indicative  that  heteropolarity  of  adjacent  striping  prevents  the 
most  intimate  structural  union,  although  the  line  of  heal  may 
appear  quite  perfect.  Now,  in  such  cases  the  anlage  seems  to 
appear  within  the  suture  and  therefore  at  an  l.s.c.  in  the  strict 
sense  rather  than  in  the  sense  of  mere  adjacency,  as  in  the  normal 
primordium  site.  In  either  type  of  formation  it  is  clear  that  there 
is  something  about  the  juxtaposition  of  wide-  with  narrow-stripe 
areas  which  locates  primordium  formation.  Extra  anlagen  can  be 
produced  at  will  in  an  almost  mechanical  way  which  is  not  teleo- 
logical,  for  the  Stentor  may  form  primordia  which  it  could  better 
do  without.  Moreover,  the  number  and  length  of  oral  formations 
is  clearly  not  limited  by  some  "  critical  metabolite  "  sufficient 
only  for  one.  Both  repeated  and  multiple  regeneration  are  possible 
for  this  cell.* 

3.  Abnormal  primordia  correlated  with  abnormal  striping 

If  primordium  formation  is  reUably  correlated  with  loci  of 
contrasting  stripe  widths,  then  this  should  also  be  manifested  in 
aberrant  stentors  with  unpremeditated  misalignments  of  the 
patterns  of  cortical  striping,  leading  to  primordia  of  very  abnormal 
forms.  A  sampling  of  such  cases  is  shown  in  Fig.  47.  Perusal  of 
these  sketches  will  show  with  what  persistence  all  loci  of  stripe 
contrast  are  filled  out  with  primordia,  often  exceedingly  bizarre. 
Even  though  the  l.s.c.  may  be  very  contorted  or  of  extraordinary 

*According  to  Uhlig  (i960)  the  size  of  the  anlage  is  also  directly  corre- 
lated with  the  degree  of  stripe  contrast  at  the  primordium  site. 


PRIMORDIUM    IN    RELATION    TO    STRIPE    PATTERN 


85 


A  1 


Fig.  47.    Abnormal  primordia. 

A.  Odd  specimen  found  in  culture  and  showing  how  the 
anlage    follows   the    contortions    of  the    locus    of  stripe-width 

contrast. 

B.  Elongate  specimen  from  aborted  fission  now  regenerating 
with  extensive  primordium  formations  in  long  l.s.c. 

C.  Dividing  stentor  showing  how  anlage  follows  contour  of 
the   fine   stripes   and   not   the   broad,    which   are   considerably 

misplaced. 

D.  Short  V-primordium  from  small,  anterior  patch  of  fine 
striping  forms  no  mouthparts  and  merely  replaces  a  portion  of 

the  original  membranellar  band. 

E.  Stage-2  regeneration  primordium  grafted  posteriorly  into 
a  stage-5  reorganizer.  Regeneration  anlage  extended  and  formed 
a  loop  primordium  which  moved  to  the  anterior  end,  broke  into 

the  peristome  and  formed  good  oral  pouch. 

F.  Reorganizing  double  stentor  with  odd  anlage  in  one  half 
consisting  only  of  an  oval  of  long  oral  cilia,  not  organized  into 

membranelles.    Specimen  then  died. 


1 86 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


length,  anlagen  formation  reliably  follows  its  contour.  Yet  when 
the  wide  stripes  were  bent  and  the  fine  stripes  not,  the  primordia 
was  normal  and  straight,  confirming  that  the  anlage  comes  from 
the  fine-line  zone.  Neighboring  sectors  of  fine  striping  put  in 
wide-stripe  areas  usually  result  in  V-shaped  primordia.  If  short 
and  far  anterior,  such  anlagen  contribute  only  a  section  of  mem- 
branelles  to  the  regenerant ;  if  long  and  extending  posteriorly,  well 
formed  mouthparts  are  generally  produced  at  the  angle,  even 
though  this  involves  the  co-operative  coiling  of  two  membranellar 
bands  in  a  way  that  does  not  naturally  occur  (see  Fig.  411).  When 
a  small  patch  of  fine  striping  becomes  surrounded  by  wide-stripe 
areas  the  patch  is  encircled  by  a  new  membranellar  band  as  a 
continuous  ring.  Especially  when  in  the  form  of  a  loop,  such  anlagen 
still  attempt  to  form  mouthparts  toward  the  posterior  end  but 
these  are  never  very  complete  (Fig.  41J).  When  in  the  form  of 
small  rings,  they  contribute  at  most  a  section  of  membranelles 
enclosing  an  extra  oral  pouch.  Schwartz  informed  me  (1958)  that 
the  same  occurs  when  small  patches  of  wide  striping  find  them- 
selves surrounded  by  a  fine-stripe  area,  and  that  this  may  occur 
even  though  the  patch  is  very  small,  suggesting  to  him  that  the 
materials  of  the  primordium  probably  do  not  come  from  wide- 
stripe  areas.  Perhaps  the  case  shown  in  Fig.  47F  was  of  this  origin ; 
at  least  it  carries  the  same  implication. 


Fig.  48.  Cases  of  primordia  (x)  curving  in  the  wrong  direction: 
into  the  wide  stripe  area.  A.  In  main  portion  of  a  graft  of  12 
coeruleus  reorganizing  on  the  fifth  day.  Only  one  of  the  anlagen 
is  abnormal  and  it  formed  only  a  short  tube  and  no  adequate 
mouthparts.  B.  In  a  doublet  stentor,  but  in  this  case  the 
abnormal  primordium  apparently  formed  good  mouthparts 
notwithstanding. 


PRIMORDIUM    IN    RELATION    TO    STRIPE    PATTERN    187 

In  four  instances  it  has  been  observed  that  the  primordium 
curved  in  a  paradoxical  direction,  the  posterior  end  bending 
tow^ard  the  wide-stripe  area  instead  of  the  narrow.  Two  cases  are 
shown  in  Fig.  48.  They  remain  entirely  unexplained. 

One  of  the  most  remarkable  relationships  between  the  stripe 
pattern  and  oral  anlage  development  is  found  in  cases  of  reversed 
asymmetry.  For  these  are  always  correlated  with  a  reversed 
position  of  wide-  and  narrow-stripe  areas  (Tartar,  1956b,  c).  My 
best  case  is  shown  for  the  first  time  in  Fig.  49.  This  was  from  a 


Fig.  49.  Reversed  asymmetry  in  »S.  coeruleus.  After  rotating 
left  half  on  right  and  anterior  half  on  posterior,  stripe  pattern 
reconstituted  with  stripes  graded  in  opposite  direction  from 
normal.  The  primordium  appears  in  the  l.s.c.  but  coils  into  the 
fine-line  zone  which  is  now  to  the  animal's  left.  Macronuclear 
chain  is  also  on  reversed  side  from  normal.  Fair  but  incomplete 
mouthparts  formed  and  specimen  reorganized  four  times 
without  achieving  an  adequate  oral  differentiation. 

Specimen  of  coeruleus  which  had  been  '*  drawn  and  quartered  ", 
i.e.,  the  anterior  half  was  first  rotated  180°  on  the  posterior,  then 
the  animal  was  cut  longitudinally  and  the  left  half  rotated  on  the 
right.  Naturally,  this  operation  resulted  in  great  disturbance  of  the 
cortical  stripe  pattern  and  when  realignment  was  achieved  the  area 
bearing  widest  stripes  lay  to  the  right  instead  of  to  the  left  of  the 
fine-line  zone.  Correspondingly,  the  anlage  coiled  in  the  reversed 


l88  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

direction  but  it  was  never  able  to  form  a  complete  set  of  mouth- 
parts  even  though  it  undertook  5  successive  regenerations.  Every 
time  the  primordium  persisted  in  coiling  in  the  "  wrong " 
direction  and  the  oral  differentiation  could  not  be  perfected.  The 
character  of  the  stripe  pattern  therefore  not  only  determines  where 
the  primordium  will  be  formed  but  also  the  direction  of  its 
asymmetry.  Still  to  be  explained  is  the  barrier,  possibly  on  the 
level  of  molecular  asymmetries,  which  blocks  the  completion  of 
cytodifferentiation.  Other  ciliates  are  able  to  produce  what  appear 
to  be  complete  mouthparts  of  reversed  asymmetry  (Lund,  191 7; 
Faure-Fremiet,  1945a;  Tartar,  1941b;  Yagiu,  1952),  yet  they  are 
incapable  of  feeding,  possibly  because  the  ciliary  organelles  beat 
in  the  wrong  direction,  and  hence  reproducing  lines  cannot  be 
estabHshed. 

4.  Primordium  formation  in  loci  of  minor  stripe  contrast 

One  naturally  asks  how  great  the  difference  between  two  ecto- 
plasmic  areas  must  be  in  terms  of  visibly  different  pigment  stripe 
widths  in  order  to  occasion  primordium  formation.  Longitudinal 
aboral  fragments  lack  both  the  widest  and  the  narrowest  stripes, 
but  they  give  evidence  that  stripe  widths  are  graded  in  an  orderly 
manner  all  the  way  around  the  cell  because  in  the  line  of  heal  the 
bands  on  the  right  are  slightly  narrower  than  the  ones  on  the  left, 
and  it  is  here  that  the  primordium  always  appears.  During  and 
after  anlage  formation  there  is  multiplication  of  stripes  in  this 
region  and  a  normal  primordium  site  is  regenerated.  When  two 
such  fragments  are  grafted  together  in  homopolar  parabiosis  there 
should  be  two  minor  l.s.c,  and  if  regeneration  occurs  rather 
promptly  two  primordia  are  accordingly  formed  and  a  doublet  is 
produced.  One  such  combination  was  made  with  very  narrow 
fragments  in  an  attempt  to  eliminate  all  stripe  differences,  but  one 
primordium  did  finally  appear  at  19  hours  in  a  minor  l.s.c.  which 
contained  no  fine  striping  (Fig.  50A).  It  would  appear  that  any 
stripe  difference,  however  minor,  is  sufficient  to  locate  the  place 
where  the  primordium  will  break  through. 

As  a  rule,  but  not  always,  the  regeneration  of  longitudinal  aboral 
halves  is  delayed  as  compared  with  whole  animals  in  which  the 
mouthparts  have  been  excised.  Causin  regarded  this  delay  as  due 
to  the  necessity  for  first  regenerating  a  typical  primordium  site. 


PRIMORDIUM    IN    RELATION    TO    STRIPE    PATTERN    189 


Fig.  50.     Consequences    of    minimum    contrast    in    granular 
stripe  widths. 

A.  Graft  of  halves  of  two  stentors  with  fine-stripe  areas 
removed.   After  delay  of  19  hours  two  primordia  finally  formed 

in  the  sutures  with  very  minor  stripe  contrast. 

B,  No  regeneration  without  stripe  contrast.  Aboral  side  with 
medium-width  striping  is  isolated  by  a  cut  but  left  attached  to 
oral  portion  so  that  the  latter,  in  swimming  will  draw  out  the 
aboral  fragment  and  keep  it  from  folding.  The  parts  soon 
separate.  Last  sketch  shows  fragment  which  failed  to  regenerate, 
presumably  because  it  lacked  a  l.s.c,  though  it  lived  and  was 

active  four  days. 


but  primordium  formation  occurs  before.  Weisz  (1951b)  ascribed 
the  delay  to  time  required  for  the  transformation  of  the  ciliary 
row  next  to  the  widest  stripe  into  a  stomatogenic  kinety,  but  there 
is  no  evidence  for  a  key  kinety  in  normal  oral  differentiation. 
Instead,  it  may  well  be  the  case  that  minor  l.s.c.  are  quantitatively 
less  potent  in  exciting  primordium  formations  and  therefore  do 
so  more  gradually,  and  further  evidence  for  this  surmise  will  be 
given  in  the  next  section.  If  so,  a  quantitative  time  factor  would 
be  available  for  investigation  in  connection  with  anlage  induction 
by  l.s.c. 

An  attempt  has  been  made  to  p^roduce  nucleate  longitudinal 
fragments  which  are  so  narrow  as  to  contain  no  significant  contrast 
in  stripe  widths  (Tartar,  1956c).  A  longitudinal  cut  was  made  far 
to  the  right  of  the  central  axis  of  a  stentor  but  the  two  parts  were 
left  joined  at  the  tail  pole.  This  was  in  order  that  the  larger  portion 
by  active  swimming  would  draw  out  the  smaller  and  prevent  it 


IQO  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

from  folding  upon  itself  with  resulting  stripe  distortions  (Fig.  50B). 
The  pieces  soon  pulled  apart  but  not  before  straight-line  healing 
had  occurred.  In  4  cases,  the  narrow  fragments  did  fail  to  form 
primordia  though  they  had  no  mouths,  retained  sufficient  macro- 
nuclear  nodes,  and  survived  and  were  active  for  about  5  days.  It 
is  therefore  possible  that  in  an  almost  completely  symmetrical 
system  there  may  not  be  sufficient  difference  or  anisotropy  of 
pattern  for  oral  differentiation.  Such  specimens  presumably  were 
entirely  capable  of  producing  primordia,  since  much  smaller 
fragments  do,  but  apparently  failed  to  do  so  because  of  the 
absence  of  any  guidance  in  where  to  produce  them.  The  attempt 
to  produce  anisotropic  systems  by  grafting  together  patches  of 
fine  striping  from  the  center  of  the  cell  and  comparable  patches 
of  wide  striping,  however,  was  not  successful;  always  sufficient 
l.s.c.  remained  and  primordia  were  formed  at  these  places. 

5.  Competition  among  loci  of  stripe  contrast;  regeneration 
and  obliteration  of  primordium  sites 

Although  the  number  of  primordia  is  usually  equal  to  the 
number  of  loci  of  stripe  contrast,  this  correspondence  is  apparently 
modified  by  competition  among  primordium  sites.  Thus  it  usually 
happened  that  in  grafts  of  two  longitudinal  aboral  halves  in  which 
membranellar  band  remnants  remained  and  delayed  the  onset  of 
regeneration  a  primordium  was  formed  in  only  one  of  the  minor 
l.s.c.  and  a  single  stentor  resulted,  as  if  one  site  became  dominant 
over  the  other  (Tartar,  1956a).  This  effect  could  work  either  way. 
Two  aboral  halves  were  grafted  with  a  complete  primordium  site 
and  regeneration  was  delayed;  two  primordia  were  produced, 
instead  of  one  in  the  major  primordium  site.  This  was  explained 
by  noting  that  in  tardy  regeneration  one  of  the  minor  l.s.c.  had 
time  to  regenerate  something  like  a  normal  primordium  site  with 
major  stripe  contrast.  When  a  number  of  aboral  halves  were 
grafted  together  with  a  single  normal  primordium  site,  the  latter 
produced  the  sole  initial  anlage  and  only  one  set  of  mouthparts 
was  regenerated.  In  later  reorganizations  the  minor  l.s.c.  had  their 
effect  in  multiple  oral  differentiation,  and  eventually  the  original 
primordium  site  disappeared  (Fig.  51  a).  This  decline  of  one 
primordium  site  appears  to  have  been  by  a  shifting  forward  and 
gradual  absorption  of  the  fine-line  zone,  but  in  most  cases  the  same 


PRIMORDIUM    IN    RELATION    TO    STRIPE    PATTERN    I91 

is  accomplished  simply  by  a  widening  of  the  narrow  striping  so 
that  the  contrast  with  neighboring  areas  disappears  (see  Fig.  58B). 
Stentor  graft  complexes  in  general  often  show  a  waxing  or  waning 
of  supernumerary  l.s.c,  always  tending  eventually  toward  the 
single  form. 


Fig.  51.  Resorption  and  formation  of  loci  of  stripe-width 
contrast,  a :  Graft  of  6  aboral  halves  without  fine  striping  plus 
one  primordium  site,  b:  Initial  oral  regeneration  only  from  the 
site  with  its  maximum  l.s.c.  c:  Reorganized  now  from  three 
primordia  as  fine  striping  multiplies  in  two  sutures  with  minor 
l.s.c.  Original  fine-line  zone  being  resorbed.  d:  Re-reorganized 
from  the  two  new  l.s.c.  only,  original  l.s.c.  nearly  obliterated. 
(After  Tartar,  1956a). 


6.  Exceptions 

The  correlation  between  loci  of  contrasting  stripe  widths  and 
primordium  formation  is  not  without  its  puzzling  exceptions. 
Primordia  have  on  rare  occasions  been  observed  to  be  formed 
w^here  no  l.s.c.  was  evident,  and  still  less  frequently  the  primor- 
dium appeared  at  some  place  other  than  the  good  primordium  site 
w^hich  w^as  present.  These  exceptions  w^ere  so  few  that  almost  all 
of  them  can  be  presented  in  Fig.  52.  In  two  cases  of  doublish  or 
mixed  up  stentors,  as  explained  in  the  caption,  the  single  or 
secondary  primordium  appeared  far  from  the  major  locus  of  stripe 
contrast  (a  and  b).  Another  case  showed  a  primordium  in  the 
primordium  site  but  also  another  on  the  opposite  side  of  the  cell 
where  there  was  no  significant  stripe  contrast  (c).  Other  cases 
showed  primordium  formations  or  extensions  in  regions  where 
the  stripe  widths  were  apparently  uniform  (d,  e,  f,  g).  A  special 
case  was  a  double  primordium  with  a  single  kinety  or  clear  stripe 
separating  the  two  halves  which  also  appeared  in  an  area  without 
significant  stripe  contrast  (h). 


192 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Fig.  52.    Exceptions  to  formation  of  primordium  in  association 
with  a  locus  of  stripe-width  contrast. 

A.  Anterior  half  of  a  stentor,  with  intact  feeding  organelles, 
was  grafted  to  two  minced  stentors.     Next  day  two  division 
anlagen  were  formed,  one  in  the  l.s.c.  and  another  (jc),  paradoxi- 
cally, amidst  medium-width  striping. 

B.  Specimen  resulting  from  rotating  anterior  half  90°  on  the 
posterior  developed  primordium  only  in  the  minor  l.s.c. 

C.  Fifth  day  reorganization  in  a  regenerator  to  which  an 
additional  regeneration  primordium  had  been  grafted. 
Secondary  anlage  (x)   appeared  where  a  primordium  site  had 

been  but  which  no  longer  showed  contrasting  stripe  areas. 

D.  Regeneration  in  posterior  tip  cut  from  a  stage-2  divider, 
the  anlage  appearing  in  a  site  of  negligible  contrast  in  stripe 

widths. 

E.  Anterior  aboral  corner  fragment  of  a  coeruleus  bearing 
anlage  without  significant  l.s.c.  but  showing  some  branching  of 
striping.    Later  normal  primordium  site  was  formed  by  further 

stripe  multiplication. 

F.  Tiny  fragment  with  regeneration  primordium  developing 
amidst  a  few  uniform  granular  stripes.    Stomatogenesis  did  not 

occur  and  the  specimen  died  2  days  later. 


PRIMORDIUM    IN    RELATION    TO    STRIPE    PATTERN     193 

Although  primordia  form  at  sutures  where  wide-stripe  areas 
He  heteropolar  to  fine  striping  (Fig.  46H),  local  reversing  of  the 
wide-stripe  half  of  an  l.s.c.  completely  blocked  anlagen  formation 
and  no  regeneration  occurred  though  the  specimens  lived  for  a 
week  or  longer  (i). 

These  apparent  exceptions  may  point  up  the  fact  that  the 
correlation  between  primordium  formation  and  loci  of  contrasting 
pigment  stripe  widths  is  a  purely  empirical  one.  It  is  probable 
that  the  granular  stripes  as  such  have  nothing  whatever  to  do 
directly  with  primordium  formation.  They  contain  no  kinetosomes 
as  possible  progenitors  of  the  basal  bodies  of  the  primordium. 
Instead  of  narrow-stripe  areas  we  might  just  as  well  have  spoken 
of  close-together  areas,  referring  to  the  fact  that  the  clear  stripes 
with  their  kinetics  here  are  not  so  far  apart  and  their  opposite 
would  then  be  "  wide-apart  areas  "  (cf.  UhUg,  1959).  At  stages  i 
and  2,  in  fact,  the  anlage  arises  wholly  within  the  fine-line  zone 
which  is  not  an  area  of  stripe  contrast,  but  the  point  is  that  this 
place  is  near  a  wide-striped  area  and  that  experiments  show  this 
to  be  significant.  All  we  can  say  is  that  there  is  a  condition  which 
is  usually  associated  with  the  juxtaposition  of  areas  bearing  wide 
stripes  with  areas  bearing  narrow  which  is  conducive  to  primor- 
dium formation.  In  the  exceptions  to  the  rule  this  crucial  condition 
may  well  be  present  though  not  in  its  normal  association  with 
contrasting  stripe  widths.  Yet  the  whole  question  of  interaction  at 
the  l.s.c.  still  remains  to  be  explored. 

It  is  attractive  to  regard  the  wide-stripe  areas  as  inducing 
primordium  formation  in  fine-stripe  areas  adjacent  or  near  by. 

G.  Two  stentors  grafted  at  right  angles.  Anlage  develops  in 
the  only  intact  primordium  site  but  extends  in  suture  toward 
remnant  of  membranellar  band  along  locus  without  contrasting 

stripes. 

H.  Regeneration  primordium  in  narrow  sector  grafted  to  a 
divider.  At  stage  shown  the  division  anlage  is  developing,  while 
the  grafted  one  extended  to  form  two  membranellar  bands 
separated  by  a  granular  stripe  an^  surrounded  by  uniform 
medium-width  striping.    (Further  development  shown  in  Fig. 

41  J-) 
I.    Wide-stripes  alongside  primordium  site  reversed  in  place 
and  no  primordium  formation  occurred  though  the  specimen 
survived  for  a  week  without  mouthparts. 


194  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

Conditions  of  embryological  induction  seem  to  be  fulfilled:  a 
fine-stripe  area  remains  morphologically  inert  as  ventral  ectoplasm 
until  it  is  brought  into  association  with  a  wide-stripe  area.  The 
latter  itself  never  produces  further  elaborations,  but  in  its  associa- 
tion with  a  fine-stripe  area  there  are  produced  the  oral  structures 
of  Stentor. 

Whatever  the  difficulties  to  be  resolved  as  we  learn  what  actually 
happens  at  the  primordium  site,  the  concept  of  the  l.s.c.  is  a  useful 
guide.  It  explains  why  a  graft  complex  produces  more  than  one 
primordium — because  it  has  more  than  one  primordium  site  or 
l.s.c. — and  this  is  not  explainable  in  terms  of  either  cytoplasmic 
or  nuclear  volumes.  It  explains  why  any  nucleated  fragment  cut 
from  locations  far  from  the  normal  primordium  site  can  neverthe- 
less regenerate:  because  of  the  graded  stripe  widths  around  the 
cell,  it  is  almost  impossible  to  produce  a  piece  which  on  healing 
will  not  bring  stripes  into  juxtaposition  with  other  stripes  that  are 
not  so  wide  and  hence  produce  a  sufficient  anisotropy  to  occasion 
primordium  formation. 

It  is  therefore  remarkable  that  on  the  cell  level  in  Stentor  we 
find  something  very  much  like  induction  as  manifested  in  the 
embryogenesis  of  amphibia.  In  both  cases  there  is  the  evocation 
of  a  major  elaboration  determining  the  principal  axis  of  the 
organism — neural  tube  in  salamander  and  feeding  organelles  in 
Stentor — around  which  a  new  individuality  can  be  organized  (see 
Fig.  55d).  This  evocation  in  both  can  be  brought  about  by  the 
juxtaposition  of  certain  parts,  and  is  followed  by  a  regionalization 
or  secondary  induction,  which  in  amphibia  determines  which  end 
of  the  tube  will  form  the  brain  and  in  stentors  is  represented  by 
mouthparts  formation  under  the  influence  of  the  posterior  end  of 
the  cell.  What  the  significance  of  this  striking  parallel  may  be  we 
cannot  yet  say,  but  the  consequences  of  the  fact  that  induction 
need  not  be  intercellular  could  be  of  considerable  theoretical 
importance. 


CHAPTER    XI 

POLARITY 

Polarization  as  a  graded  "  difference  "  is  probably  a  precondition 
for  the  achievement  of  persisting  organic  form,  for  we  cannot 
imagine  how  potentiahties  for  development  could  begin  in  an 
entirely  anisotropic  system.  Although  specific  form  is  not  explain- 
able in  terms  of  polarities,  which  are  almost  universal  in  the  organic 
world,  the  guidance  of  development  is  traceable  thereto;  and 
polarity  may  well  be  intimately  involved  in  the  first  stages  of 
differentiation  itself  (see  Bonner,  1958).  For  radially  symmetric 
organisms  like  Acetabidaria,  cellular  slime  molds,  and  higher 
plants,  antero-posterior  polarization  may  be  sufficient,  but  Stentor 
is  asymmetric  in  the  position  of  its  mouthparts  and  the  pattern  of 
the  lateral  striping.  In  the  ciliate  we  may  therefore  expect  to  find 
transverse  as  well  as  axial  gradients  in  some  intimate  property  of 
the  cortical  cytoplasm ;  and  in  addition,  the  structural  elements  of 
the  ectoplasm,  which  persist  in  fragments  and  in  whole  cells  in 
reorganization  and  division,  have  a  built-in  polarity  and  asymmetry. 
The  importance  of  polar  differences  in  explaining  form  has  been 
emphasized  above  all  by  Child  (1941).  Consciously  or  not,  the 
tradition  he  established  has  continually  been  drawn  upon.  Child 
also  included  Stentor  in  the  scope  of  his  investigations,  yet  his 
findings  in  this  context  are  here  considered  in  a  different  chapter 
because  they  seem,  for  the  most  part,  to  be  more  indicative  of 
structural  differences.  In  the  autonomous  differentiation  of  stentors 
there  is  better  evidence  for  gradients  than  in  responses  to  external 
agents. 

I.  Fixity  of  structural  polarity 

There  is  abundant  evidence  that  structural  polarization  charac- 
terizes the  formed  components  of  the  ectoplasm.  As  already 
described,  ciliary  row  s  or  kinetics  are  intrinsically  polarized  because 
they  follow  the  general  rule  of  desmodexy  in  ciliates :  the  fiber  or 


195 


196  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

fibers  connecting  the  cilia  in  Stentor  are  always  to  the  right  of  the 
ciliary  meridian  so  that  one  cannot  turn  a  kinety  upside  down  and 
have  the  over-all  pattern  remain  the  same.  Endomyonemes  or 
M-bands  also  show  graded  differences  in  tapering  widths  and  in 
density  of  lateral  connections.  Polarity  may  even  characterize  the 
granular  stripes,  for  in  pigmented  forms  grafted  in  heteropolar 
orientation  there  is  always  a  white  line  or  space  where  granules 
are  not  continuous  at  the  place  of  abutment.  Since  we  do  not 
conceive  of  a  polarity  in  these  granules  themselves,  it  follows  that 
the  ectoplasm  in  which  they  reside  may  itself  be  polarized,  though 
little  differentiated  otherwise. 

Balbiani  (1893)  recognized  that  original  polarities  were  retained 
in  Stentor  fragments  as  shown  by  the  direction  of  their  swimming; 
and  Prowazek  (1904)  made  the  same  claim  on  the  basis  that  folded 
longitudinal  halves  eventually  draw  themselves  out  in  correspon- 
dence with  the  original  polar  axis.  Causin  (1931)  found  that 
triangular  fragments  cut  from  the  middle  of  the  cell  retained  their 
polarity  although  the  "  bulk  axis  "  was  at  first  at  right  angles  to 
this,  but  Weisz  (1951b)  provided  a  more  convincing  demonstration. 
He  cut  stentors  in  such  a  way  that  the  future  site  of  the  primordium 
was  bent  around  over  the  anterior  end  of  the  cell,  or  conversely, 
part  of  the  general  striping  was  bent  around  so  that  its  forward  end 
pointed  backward  toward  a  much-shortened  primordium  site. 
When  anlagen  appeared  they  followed  the  striping,  as  did  the 
general  reconstruction  of  shape,  in  complete  disregard  of  the 
"  bulk  axis  ".  It  is  in  fact  difficult  to  conceive  how  a  fluid  endo- 
plasm  could  have  an  axis  at  all.  The  main  point  is  that  intrinsic 
polarity  persists  in  the  striped  ectoplasm,  no  matter  how  oriented. 
Weisz's  inference,  that  the  polarity  of  the  so-called  stomatogenic 
kinety  determines  the  polarity  of  the  oral  primordium  and  that  of 
the  entire  cell  cannot  be  the  case,  however,  because  the  primordium 
first  appears  at  nearly  right  angles  to  the  striping  and  at  a  consider- 
able distance  from  the  kinety  in  question,  and  because  reversing 
the  whole  sector  containing  the  primordium  site  does  not  result 
in  reversing  the  polarity  of  the  entire  cell. 

For  intrinsic  polarity  within  the  ectoplasm  is  best  demonstrated 
by  altering  the  orientation  of  parts  of  the  cell  or  separating  parts 
and  turning  them  around.  The  simplest  response  is  that  the 
disarranged  parts  shift  into  homopolar  alignment.  If  a  patch  is 


POLARITY 


A. 

into 

B. 
C. 


G 

Fig.  53.    Adjustments  correcting  heteropolarity. 
When  primordium  site  is  implanted  transversely  it  rotates 
harmony   with    axis    of  the    host,    striping   of  the    latter 

accommodating. 
Left  half  rotated  180°  on  right,  but  parts  eventually  come 

into  homopolar  alignment. 
Same  operation  performed  on  doublet  stentor  leads  to 
homopolar  alignment  of  the  two  individualities. 

D.  Fine-line  zone  grafted  heteropolar  into  host  with  mouth- 
parts  removed.  In  this  case  regeneration  anlage  formed  only  at 
the  host  primordium  site,  possibly  because  the  reversed  patch 

was  gradually  resorbed  in  situ. 

E.  Wide-stripe  sector  implanted  heteropolar  often  shifts 
forward  or  posteriorly,  being  resorbed  or  isolating  itself  from 

the  host  pattern. 

F.  Early  primordium  may  fail  to  develop  even  when  grafted 
to  a  regenerator  in  same  stage  of  development  if  implanted 

heteropolar. 

G.  Alternatively,  both  early  primordia  may  be  resorbed  but 
when  re-formation  occurs  there  is  no  anlage  induced  in  the 

reversed  primordium  site. 

H.     Reversed    primordium-site    sector   commonly    leads    to 

formation    of  three    individualities,    the    lowest    in    the    figure 

being  of  reversed  asymmetry.    (In  part  after  Tartar,    1956b, 

1957c,  1958b.) 


198  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

grafted  transversely  across  the  striping  of  the  host  it  will  rotate  in 
correspondence  with  the  host  axis  (see  Fig.  44B),  and  even  when  a 
stentor  is  cut  in  two  longitudinally  and  the  halves  rotated  180°  on 
each  other  they  often  rotate  back  into  their  original  alignment 
(Tartar,  1957c),  as  shown  in  Fig.  53.  Grafted  pairs  could  shift  into 
homopolar  orientation  from  any  initial  arrangement  (Tartar, 
1954).  The  original  polarity  of  the  components  is  obviously 
retained  and  becomes  the  basis  for  their  extensive  movements 
with  reference  to  each  other  in  the  reorientation  (see  Fig.  28B). 

Another  response  which  sometimes  occurs  when  patches  or 
sectors  are  completely  reversed  is  that  the  misoriented  piece 
becomes  resorbed  in  place  (Fig.  53D)  (Tartar,  1958b).  Commonly 
the  ectopic  patch  creeps  towards  the  anterior  or  posterior  end  of 
the  host  where  it  is  gradually  resorbed  (e).  A  less  drastic  expression 
of  this  way  of  resolving  the  conflict  in  polarities  is  observed  in  the 
suppression  of  such  pieces,  as  when  early  primordium  sectors  are 
grafted  heteropolar  on  to  regenerating  hosts  and  the  anlage  then 
fails  to  develop,  or  when  the  induction  of  a  secondary  primordium 
fails  to  occur  in  an  additional  primordium  site  implanted  in 
reverse  (Tartar,  1958b)  as  we  show  in  (f)  and  (g).  These  cases 
may  be  of  great  interest  for  their  implication  that  the  instigation 
and  support  of  primordium  development  involves  geometric 
relationships  in  the  entire  cortex  and  are  not  solely  the  result,  say, 
of  a  substance  like  RNA  being  released  within  the  cell  and  affecting 
formative  loci  regardless  of  how  they  lie. 

Reversed  sectors  may  not  be  resorbed  but  creep  to  one  end  of 
the  host  and  establish  new  individualities  (Tartar,  1956a)  clearly 
demonstrating  the  autonomous  polarity  of  the  implant  (h). 
Alternatively — and  most  intriguing  for  the  problem  of  polarity — 
the  patch  may  remain  in  place  and  produce  an  astonishing 
disturbance  of  the  form  and  morphogenesis  of  the  cell  (Tartar, 
1956b).  In  Fig.  54A  is  shown  one  case  of  four  in  which  regeneration 
never  occurred  though  the  animals  survived  6  days — striking 
instances  of  inhibition  of  regeneration  apparently  due  to  polar 
conflicts ;  and  (b)  is  an  example  of  the  transient  chaos  which  may 
develop  before  polar  discrepancies  are  resolved.  Nuclear  nodes 
also  are  often  abnormally  located,  indicating  that  the  overlying 
ectoplasm  guides  the  movements  of  the  macronucleus.  From  these 
extraordinary  disturbances  it  may  be  inferred  that,  although  the 


POLARITY 


199 


polarity  is  intrinsic  within  each  part,  there  is  an  interaction  of  some 
sort  by  which  heteropolarity  may  lead  to  extensive  disharmonies 
beyond  the  original  misalignment. 


Fig.  54.    Disturbances  in  heteropolar  systems. 

A.  Primordium  sector  of  stage-4  reorganizer  reversed  in  situ. 
Absence  of  stomatogenesis  associated  with  posterior  end  of  anlage 
lying  now  in  the  frontal  field.  The  inverted  patch  {x)  apparently 
was  gradually  resorbed  but  no  regeneration  occurred  during 

7-day  survival.    Nuclear  distribution  abnormal. 

B.  Stage-2  regeneration  primordium  sector  grafted  hetero- 
polar to  regenerating  stentor  in  same  stage.  Both  anlagen  were 
resorbed;  then  two  new  ones  produced  the  incomplete  oral 
diflferentiations  shown  in  the  second  sketch  as  the  shape  became 
grossly   abnormal.     Specimen    is    re-regenerating   with   single 

primordium. 


Polar  conflicts  may  be  resolved  by  the  larger  part  becoming 
dominant  (Fig,  55A).  A  compromise  may  result  in  heteromorphosis, 
in  which  a  secondary  polarity  is  responsible  for  the  formation  of 
an  extra  set  of  feeding  organelles  but  the  lateral  striping  has, 
throughout,  the  polarity  of  the  major  portion  of  the  specimen  so 
that  the  secondary  oral  differentiation  is  of  reversed  asymmetry  (b). 
These  forms  are  however  less  frequent  and  less  well-developed  in 
Stentor  than  in  other  ciliates.  When  the  major  mid-section  of  the 
cell  is  reversed,  all  parts  retain  their  original  polarities  and 
multiple  formations  occur  (C). 

Shifting  the  head  to  the  posterior  end  does  not  result  in  reversal 
of  polarity.  The  most  frequent  result  (unpublished)  was  that  a  new 
set  of  feeding  organelles  eventually  regenerated  at  the  original 
anterior  end  of  the  major  cell  body,  and  the  displaced  head  became 


200 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Fig.  55,    Observations  concerning  polarity. 

A.  Heteromorphic  specimen  from  abortive  fission  of  a 
divider   grafted   to   a   regenerator,    showing   tendency   toward 

resorption  of  conflicting  part. 

B.  Heteromorph  with  continuous  striping  and  therefore 
reversed  asymmetry  in  the  smaller  part,  consequence  of  hetero- 
polar  implant  (later  separating)  which  set  up  a  secondary  polar 

axis. 

C.  When  major  portion  of  stentor  is  reversed  (head  and  tail 
trade  places)  all  parts  retain  their  polarities  and  mid-portion 

regenerates  separate  head  (x)  and  tail  (3;). 

D.  Head  excised  and  grafted  to  replace  tail  at  posterior  end 
does  not  reverse  the  cell  polarity  nor  prevent  regeneration  of  the 

"host"  but  organizes  a  new  individuality. 


the  center  of  organization  and  growth  of  a  secondary  cell  shape 
(Fig.  55D).  From  the  standpoint  of  oral  inhibition  these  cases  were 
also  interesting  as  showing  that  a  displaced  set  of  intact  feeding 
organelles  can  much  delay  primordiiim  formation  but  not  prevent 
it  entirely. 

All  these  experiments  so  attest  the  fixity  of  polarity  in  every 
part  of  the  cortex  that  one  wonders  whether  reversal  of  polarity  is 
ever  possible.  It  would  seem  that  the  best  place  to  look  for  such  a 


POLARITY  201 

reversal  is  in  folded  aboral  halves  in  which  the  striping  bends  and 
breaks  to  form  a  new  holdfast  (see  Fig.  27),  for  in  these  cases  both 
posterior  and  anterior  ends  of  the  severed  striping  meet  at  the  new 
posterior  pole.  Yet  such  specimens  will  have  to  be  followed  very 
closely  to  determine  whether  the  stripes  in  reversed  orientation 
are  not  subsequently  resorbed. 

2.  Rate  of  regeneration  in  relation  to  the  polar  axis 

A  further  manifestation  of  polarity  is  of  course  to  be  found  in 
the  fact  that  heads  are  always  regenerated  at  anterior  ends  of 
fragments  and  tails  at  the  posterior.  As  in  regeneration  of  metazoa, 
the  organism  can  produce  either  anterior  or  posterior  structures 
from  almost  any  level  of  the  body,  the  choice  depending  on  the 
original  polarity.  Although  coelenterates  and  turbellarians  may 
produce  heteropolar  heads  on  very  short  pieces,  this  does  not  occur 
in  stentors.  Isolated  heads  do  not  become  heteromorphic  (see 
Fig.  32)  nor  do  disc-shaped  fragments  whose  longitudinal  dimen- 
sion is  brief  (Fig.  25A).  Nevertheless,  it  is  conceivable  that  the  rate 
of  oral  regeneration  might  vary  with  level  of  cut,  as  in  flatworms 
(Bronsted,  1955).  That  this  is  not  the  case  within  a  single  cell  such 
as  Stentor  was  first  shown  by  Gruber  (1885b)  who  found  that 
animals,  minus  the  head  only,  regenerated  a  new  set  of  feeding 
organelles  as  rapidly  as  posterior  fragments.  This  was  confirmed 
by  Weisz  (1948a),  who  also  found  (1948c)  that  the  relative  growth 
rates  of  fragments  from  any  region  were  the  same.  Contrary  to  the 
experience  with  stentors,  Sokoloff  (19 13)  reported  that  middle 
pieces  of  Spirostomum  regenerate  faster  than  the  ends  but  I  think 
this  work  requires  checking. 

Although  denying  an  axial  gradient  in  speed  of  regeneration, 
Weisz  (1948a)  stated  that  oral  regeneration  is  hastened  by  the 
presence  of  a  holdfast,  mid-pieces  regenerating  more  slowly  than 
posterior  fragments.  Child  (1949)  regarded  this  difference  as 
probably  incidental  to  the  fact  that  middle  fragments  have  to 
accomplish  two  regenerations,  of  both  head  and  tail.  This  could  be 
tested  in  other  ways,  as  I  have  done  (unpublished).  If  the  presence 
of  a  holdfast  hastens  oral  regeneration,  then  stentors  from  which 
the  head  only  is  excised  should  regenerate  sooner  than  animals 
from  which  head  and  tail  are  removed,  but  they  do  not.  On  Weisz's 
assumption,  the  former  should  also  regenerate  in  the  same  time  as 


202  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

small  tail  pieces  since  both  have  holdfasts,  but  I  found  the 
regeneration  of  the  latter  to  be  always  slower.  Slower  regeneration 
of  oral  parts  in  tail  pieces  may  be  the  consequence  of  another 
aspect  of  polarity  which  will  now  be  discussed. 

3.  Gradients  in  head  and  tail  formation 

Popoff  (1909)  had  found  in  abortive  fissions  of  Stentor  that  even 
though  the  daughters  did  not  separate,  a  new  tail  pole  with  hold- 
fast, projecting  laterally,  was  produced  for  the  anterior  cell  because 
the  lateral  striping  had  been  severed  by  the  fission  line.  Weisz 
(1951b)  then  showed  that  foot  formation  could  be  brought  about 
by  excisions  of  post-oral  striping,  but  the  nearer  the  anterior  end 
the  more  incomplete  and  temporary  was  the  pedal  diff"erentiation 
(see  Fig.  26a).  Notice  that  the  holdfast  forms  not  merely  where 
the  stripes  come  together  (at  the  posterior  pole)  but  also  differen- 
tially along  the  whole  side  of  the  cell,  wherever  ablation  creates  a 
new  terminus  of  polarization. 

Uhlig  (1959)  confirmed  that  there  is  a  gradient  in  tail  formation, 
highest  at  the  posterior  end  and  diminishing  anteriorly.  This 
gradient  is  strongest  on  the  ventral  side  where  the  oral  primordium 
is  also  formed,  as  shown  by  the  appearance  of  a  secondary  tail 
projection  in  this  region  when  anterior  halves  are  rotated  on  the 
posterior  (see  Fig.  26b).  The  polar  pedal  gradient  is  therefore 
involved  with  the  circumferential  gradient  in  stripe  widths,  since 
it  is  on  the  ventral  side  that  the  locus  of  stripe  width  contrast 
determines  both  the  location  of  the  oral  anlage  and  the  side  on 
which  the  new  tail-pole  will  appear. 

Now,  the  polar  gradient  in  foot  formation  is  also  coincident  with 
that  responsible  for  the  induction  of  mouthparts  formation.  When- 
ever, but  only  when,  an  end  of  the  oral  primordium  lies  near  a  part 
of  the  posterior  end,  or  its  entirety,  are  mouthparts  produced. 
This  inductive  relationship  has  already  been  discussed  (p.  202) 
but  should  now  be  considered  further  within  the  context  of  polar 
gradients. 

Following  the  implications  of  double  oral  differentiation  in 
reversed  primordium  sectors  (see  Fig.  44A),  Uhlig  (1959)  has 
explored  this  matter  thoroughly  and  concluded  that  the  inductive 
action  is  strongest  just  beyond  the  posterior  pole,  diminishing 
anteriorly.  Because  his  detailed  report  is  not  yet  available,  I  have 


POLARITY  203 

supplied  sketches  from  my  own  experiments  (including  Fig.  44), 
which   may   therefore   be   regarded    as   generally   confirmatory. 


Fig.  56.   Observations  regarding  induction  of  stomatogenesis  by 
the  posterior  end. 

A.  In  an  oral  half  of  a  stage-3  divider  the  anlage  was  not 
resorbed  but  extended  all  the  way  to  the  posterior  pole  and 
produced  no  mouthparts,  presumably  because  inducing  region 

is  anterior  to  the  pole  itself. 

B.  Two  extra  tail  poles  engrafted  led  to  multiple  stomato- 

genesis, with  complete  but  ectopic  gullet  (x). 

C.  Specimen  with  two  tail  poles  due  to  shift  of  primordium 
site    produced    a    stentor    with    unusually    large    mouthparts, 

possibly  due  to  the  double  tail. 

Primordia  far  from  the  posterior  end  produce  no  mouthparts 
(Figs.  47D,  and  26c).  That  the  oral-inductive  gradient  stops  short 
of  the  posterior  pole  is  indicated  in  Fig.  5  6a,  showing  incomplete 
oral  differentiation  in  a  primordium  extending  too  far  posteriorly. 
It  is  possible,  also,  that  inductive  action  may  be  compounded  by 
the  presence  of  multiple  posterior  ends.  When  three  tails  were 
grafted,  double  mouthparts  were  produced  in  the  host  (b),  and  in 
another  case  three  posterior  poles  may  have  been  responsible  for 
unusually  large  mouthparts  formed  (c).  Astomatous  oral  differen- 
tiation in  large  fusion  masses  may  be  due  to  the  mutual  canceling 
of  oral  induction  gradients  in  these  random  grafts.  A  similar  initial 
astomatous  development  in  isolated  sectors  bearing  division  pri- 
mordia (Tartar,  1958c)  may  likewise  have  been  due  to  the  frag- 
ments at  first  containing  insufficient  polar  regions,  a  situation  later 
corrected  by  regeneration  of  the  posterior  pole. 


204  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

Uhlig  also  regards  the  appearance  of  a  primordium  or  new 
membranellar  band  in  connection  with  the  locus  of  stripe  width 
contrast  as  expressing  a  circumferential  gradient  in  propensity  for 
anlage  formations,  and  this  may  be  a  fruitful  way  of  regarding 
these  events.  Certainly  the  granular  stripe  widths,  or  as  he  perhaps 
more  pertinently  states,  the  distance  between  the  fibrous  clear 
stripes,  form  an  orderly  gradient  around  the  cell.  Primordium 
formation  might  therefore  be  regarded  as  always  occurring  at  the 
*'  head  end  "  of  this  gradient,  or  where  the  finest  pigment  stripes 
are  found.  Whatever  explanatory  virtue  the  polarity  or  gradient 
concept  may  have  would  then  be  applicable  to  happenings  in  this 
region.  Yet  there  are  some  difficulties  which  still  need  to  be 
resolved,  for  example,  how  primordium  formations  at  transverse 
sutures  (see  Fig.  460)  can  be  regarded  as  expressing  a  gradient. 

A  harmonious  co-operation  between  the  circular  gradient 
manifested  in  graded  stripe  widths  and  the  polar  gradient  of  mouth- 
parts  induction  is,  according  to  Uhlig,  necessary  for  complete  oral 
development.  The  former  guides  the  location  and  longitudinal 
development  of  the  membranellar  band,  later  invagination  of  its 
posterior  end  to  form  the  mouthparts  being  induced  by  some 
influence  having  its  high  point  near  the  posterior  end  of  the  cell. 

When  a  stentor  divides  or  is  cut  in  two,  there  would  be,  in 
Uhlig's  conception,  readjustment  to  a  new  equilibrium  in  which 
the  original  single  polar  gradient  is  converted  into  two.  As  inti- 
mated above,  short  tail-pole  fragments  may  therefore  be  slow  in 
regenerating  because  of  their  need  for  greater  readjustments  before 
significant  polar  differences  can  be  re-established.  When  stentors 
are  cut  in  two  and  rotated  so  that  anterior  and  posterior  stripe 
systems  cannot  rejoin,  a  conflict  between  double  but  homopolar 
gradients  apparently  ensues,  which  is  resolved  in  various  ways  to 
be  described  later  (p.  227). 

Stentors  therefore  may  be  said  to  bear  within  the  structure  of 
every  part  of  the  cortex  an  antero-posterior  and  a  left-right 
polarization.  In  addition,  there  is  experimental  evidence  for  polar 
and  circular  gradients  of  paramount  importance  in  the  elaboration 
of  major  ectoplasmic  organelles. 


CHAPTER    XII 

FUSION   MASSES 
OF  WHOLE   STENTORS 

Repeated  and  cumulative  grafting  of  stentors  made  possible  the 
formation  of  relatively  huge  fusion  masses  of  stentor  protoplasm. 
These  cytoplasmic  continuums  made  from  many  cells  are  unique 
among  biological  phenomenon,  and  their  potentialities  for  con- 
tributing to  our  understanding  of  the  organism  have  by  no  means 
been  exhausted.  At  present  we  can  at  least  describe  the  response 
of  Stentor  when  confronted  with  the  problem  of  organizing  a  far 
greater  than  normal  mass  of  protoplasm.  The  same  forces  of 
mending,  adhesion,  and  integration  which  hold  the  single  stentor 
together  conspire  in  masses  to  make  enduring  unions,  and  there 
is  little  indication  that  pathologies  arise  which  would  obscure  or 
preclude  the  expression  of  morphogenetic  potentialities. 

In  fact,  Stentor  masses  often  live  longer  than  single  individuals 
under  the  same  circumstances,  perhaps  for  the  reason  that  larger 
aggregates  have  more  substance  to  draw  upon  under  conditions  of 
relative  starvation.  Up  to  the  last  day  or  two  of  their  life,  the 
masses  remain  active  and  apparently  healthy,  and  there  is  no 
reason  to  suspect  that  they  die  from  any  other  cause  than  starvation. 
Large  masses  may  not  even  suffer  from  reduced  surface  in  relation 
to  volume  as  interfering  with  exchange  of  oxygen  and  carbon 
dioxide ;  for  they  take  the  shape  of  pancakes  about  as  thick  as  the 
normal  cell  so  that,  as  in  the  erythrocyte,  every  point  of  the  interior 
retains  a  fairly  normal  access  to  the  surrounding  medium.  The 
problems  of  these  complexes  therefore  seem  to  be  more  morpho- 
logical than  physiological  and  they  survive  long  enough  to  show 
much  of  what  they  can  do. 

I.  Simple  masses  and  biotypes 

We  begin  with  the  simplest  combinations  of  only  two  or  a  few 
more  cells,  something  of  the  behavior  of  which  has  already  been 

205 


206  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

indicated  in  our  previous  discussions.  Double  animals  are  already 
well  known  in  ciliates  (see  Faure-Fremiet,  1948a)  and  were 
encountered  in  Stentor  cultures  by  early  observers  (Balbiani, 
1891b;  Johnson,  1893;  Stevens,  1903;  and  Faure-Fremiet,  1906). 
Such  as  these  can  therefore  arise  in  nature.  They  probably 
originate  by  the  incomplete  separation  of  daughter  cells  during 
fission,  tandemly  joined  daughter  cells  later  shifting  alongside  each 
other,  often  with  apposition  of  feeding  organelles  and  tail-poles.  In 
some  ciliates,  notably  Colpidium  (Sonneborn,  1932)  and  especially 
Paramecium  (Calkins,  191 1)  growth  without  fission  may  continue 
and  produce  monsters  or  very  large  multiple  individualities.  In 
general,  however,  studies  on  these  abnormal  forms  have  revealed 
two  tendencies:  first,  that  doublets,  and  to  a  less  extent  triplets, 
become  stable  biotypes  which  can  reproduce  themselves  as  such, 
and  second,  the  complexes  eventually  become  single  individuaHties 
again  by  the  gradual  integration  of  their  multiple  morphologies; 
and  it  is  the  same  in  Stentor. 

From  the  chance  encounter  of  these  forms,  the  next  step  was  to 
produce  them  at  will.  This  can  be  accompHshed  by  a  variety  of 
means  which  block  the  final  stages  of  cell  division — to  mention 
only  one,  the  dilute  formaldehyde  treatments  of  Faure-Fremiet 
(1945a).  Possibilities  of  experiment  were  then  greatly  extended 
when  it  was  found  that  stentors  could  be  fused  together  by  grafting 
in  almost  any  number  or  arrangement  desired  (Tartar,  1941b). 

In  the  simplest  complexes,  grafted  pairs  or  2-masses  could  form 
I,  2,  or  3  primordia  on  regenerating  (Tartar,  1954).  The  number 
of  sets  of  feeding  organelles  produced  was  called  the  oral  valency. 
In  the  first  case,  the  graft  reverted  almost  at  once  to  single  indivi- 
duality; in  the  rarest  instances  in  which  3  anlagen  were  formed, 
temporary  triplets  resulted.  But  the  great  majority  of  2-masses 
remained  double  for  a  long  time.  This  corrected  Weisz's  (1951a) 
first  impression  that  pairs  always  revert  to  singles  within  18  hours 
through  the  dominance  of  one  partner  over  the  other. 

All  indications  are  that  the  oral  valency  of  small  masses  is  strictly 
correlated  with  the  number  of  effective  primordium  sites  available, 
as  earlier  intimated  (Tartar,  1954).  Neither  total  volume  nor 
amount  of  nuclear  material  was  determinative.  The  number  of 
anlagen  produced  corresponded  with  the  expected  probability 
with  which,  in  random  grafting,  the  original  sites  would  remain 


FUSION    MASSES    OF    WHOLE    STENTORS 


207 


intact,  one  would  be  obliterated,  or  grafting  would  produce  an 
extra  juxtaposition  of  wide-  and  fine-stripe  areas. 

At  first,  multiple  sets  of  feeding  organelles  often  remained 
separated  by  lateral  striping,  and  such  complexes  were  called 
doubles   or  triples.   There   was   a   strong  tendency   for  feeding 


Fig.  57.   Biotypes  of  S.  coeruleus. 

A.  Doublets  regenerate  and  divide  as  doublets,  forming  two 
anlagen  in  correspondence  to  the  two  primordium  sites  or  l.s.c. 

B.  Similarly  for  triplets. 

C.  Quadruplet  formed  by  grafting    four    oral,   longitudinal 
halves  does  not  persist  as  such  but  transforms  into  transition 

disequilibrium  forms. 


y- 


>/. 


208  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

organelles  to  associate  around  one  frontal  field  as  the  grafted 
animals  shifted  to  produce  a  normal,  homopolar,  conical  Stentor 
shape  as  persisting  doublets  and  triplets.  The  latter  forms  may  be 
called  biotypes  because  they  regenerated  and  reproduced  as  such 

(Fig.  57)- 

One  doublet  could  produce  thousands  by  multipHcation,  but 
after  i  or  2  months  cultivation  there  was  a  gradual  reversion  to  the 
normal  single  form.  Triplets  also  reproduced  themselves  and  they 
generally  reverted  to  type  in  a  shorter  period,  always  *'  stepping- 
down  "  first  to  doublets  and  then  to  singles.  Persistence  for  a  long 
time  of  these  biotypes  may  be  related  to  their  bilateral  symmetry 
and  unity  of  form  as  expressed,  for  example,  in  the  presence  of 
but  one  tail-pole  and  holdfast.*  Faure-Fremiet  (1948a)  regarded 
the  balance  between  the  two  halves  of  a  doublet  as  imposing  a 
*'  structural  constraint  "  on  labile  transformation  back  to  the  single 
type ;  for  in  such  forms  as  Leucophrys  patiila  he  found  that  cutting 
injuries  or  the  diminution  of  one  component  led  promptly  to 
reorganization  as  a  single  individuality.  The  application  of  this 
principle  to  Stentor  is  not  immediate  because  the  removal  of  a 
single  set  of  feeding  organelles  in  doublets  merely  leads  to  regenera- 
tion on  the  cut  side  and  reorganization  on  the  other,  producing 
the  doublet  type  again.  Yet  asymmetric  doublets  are  the  most 
likely  soon  to  revert  spontaneously  to  the  single  type. 

It  is  doubtless  significant  that  the  quadruplet  biotype  could  not 
be  produced.  This  limitation  has  also  been  found  in  other  ciliates 
(Faure-Fremiet,  1945a).  Grafts  of  4  stentors  could  produce  tran- 
sient quadruplets  but  these  did  not  persist  and  quickly  reduced  the 
oral  valency.  Unlike  triplets,  quadruplets  could  transform  at  once 
to  giant  singles  (Fig.  57c)  and  this  was  the  first  indication  of  the 
tendency  to  reduction  of  oral  valency  in  relation  to  the  number  of 
components  grafted,  which  became  increasingly  prominent  as  the 
size  of  masses  was  enlarged. 

The  problem  of  organic  individuality  is  confronted  when  we 
ask  whether  doublets  are  single  or  double  individualities.  They 
swim  and  feed  and  reproduce  in  a  co-ordinated  manner  like  single 
cells,  and  there  is  no  further  evidence  that  the  two  sides  of  a 


*Uhlig  (i960)  reported  that  the  one  holdfast  in  doublets  is  nevertheless 
doublish  or  larger  than  normal,  and  similarly  for  triplets. 


FUSION    MASSES    OF    WHOLE    STENTORS 


209 


doublet  contract  independently  as  Balbiani  (1891b)  first  described. 
Doublets  generally  show  the  single  conical  shape  ending  in  one 
holdfast,  but  there  are  two  contractile  vacuoles,  two  macronuclear 


Fig.  58.    Conversion  of  doublets  to  singles. 

A.  Doublet  becomes  single  by  removing  one  of  the  primor- 
dium  sites  or  major  loci  of  stripe  contrast.  On  reorganizing,  both 
sets  of  original  mouthparts  are  resorbed  and  the  excised  l.s.c.  is 

not  reconstituted. 

B.  Spontaneous  conversion,  in  which  one  (x)  of  the  two 
original  loci  of  stripe  contrast  disappears  and  the  specimen 
reorganizes  singly,  also  achieving  a  single  macronuclear  chain. 

C.  Isolated  head  end  of  doublet  shows  first  a  proportionate 
shortening  of  the  membranellar  bands,  then  cutting  out  and 
resorption  of  one  of  the  mouths  and  obliteration  of  one  primor- 
dium  site,  becoming  a  normal  stentor  even  without  primordium 

formation. 


2IO  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

chains,  and  two  complete  sets  of  feeding  organelles.  Above  all,  the 
pattern  of  lateral  striping  is  double,  with  two  primordium  sites 
or  loci  of  stripe  contrast ;  and  this  is  seen  to  be  crucial,  for  whenever 
doublets  revert  to  singles  there  is  always  the  obliteration  of  one 
primordium  site,  after  which  all  other  aspects  of  the  complex 
become  single.  And  doublets  could  be  converted  at  once  into 
singles  by  excising  one  of  the  primordium  sites,  even  if  the 
bistomial  head  was  left  intact  (Fig.  58A). 

It  was  difficult  in  cultures  to  catch  doublets  in  the  act  of  trans- 
forming into  singles,  but  something  of  how  this  occurs  may  be 
indicated  in  the  following.  Figure  5 8b  shows  an  asymmetrical 
doublet  which  was  in  fact  not  a  2-mass  but  produced  by  grafting 
a  primordium  site  into  a  single  animal.  Such  specimens  remained 
as  doublets  for  several  days,  but  then  one  of  the  primordium  sites 
disappeared  as  such,  either  the  host  site  or  that  of  the  graft 
transforming  into  uniform  lateral  striping,  for  there  was  no  evidence 
of  stripe  resorption.  The  transformation  illustrated  in  (c)  was 
instigated  in  the  anterior  half  fragment  of  a  broad  symmetrical 
doublet.  Reduction  to  half  the  original  size  resulted  in  the  length 
of  the  membranellar  bands  being  greatly  reduced  in  situ  until  they 
became  proportionate  to  the  new  cell  size,  but  the  mouthparts 
remained  large.  One  primordium  site  then  disappeared  as  its 
contrasting  pigment  stripes  became  of  uniform  width.  While  this 
was  occurring  the  mouth  subtending  these  stripes  separated  from 
the  membranellar  band  and  moved  into  the  frontal  field  where  it 
was  gradually  resorbed.  The  two  bands  then  joined  together  and 
the  final  result  was  a  single  stentor  produced  even  without  the 
formation  of  a  reorganization  primordium. 

Although  there  is  evidently  a  strong  tendency  towards  unifica- 
tion of  shape,  one  may  speak  of  a  reversed  propensity  of  sets  of 
lateral  striping  to  establish  separate  shapes,  as  if  a  complex  which 
cannot  achieve  complete  singleness  then  settles  on  a  frank  expres- 
sion of  its  multiplicity.  Doublets,  especially  when  so  oriented  as 
to  have  two  frontal  fields,  become  double  cones  or  Siamese  twins, 
and  enduring  triplets  also  develop  *'  cleavages  "  making  them 
triple  shaped  (Fig.  59A  and  b). 

A  single  animal  even  converted  itself  into  a  double  shape  when 
the  tail-pole  was  bent  and  directed  forward  (c).  These  examples 
show  again  that  there  is  no  mysterious  unity  in  the  endoplasm  and 


FUSION    MASSES    OF    WHOLE    STENTORS 


211 


that  cell  shape  is  an  expression  of  the  cortical  stripe  pattern, 
following  its  unity,  distortion,  or  multiplicity.  In  other  words,  one 
never  finds  a  normal  cell  shape  imposed  on  a  grossly  abnormal 
stripe  pattern. 


Fig.  59.    Formation  of  multiple  cell-shapes. 

A.  Persistent    doublets    often   show   tendency   to    produce 

parallel  bodies. 

B.  The  same  tendency  to  "cleavages"  shown  in  a  triplet 

(posterior  end  view). 

C.  Tail  folded  into  wound  left  by  removing  the  division 
primordium.  A  new  tail  was  produced  at  the  bend  (x)  and  each 
pole  organized  a  separate  cell  shape.     The  nuclear  chain  is 

relocated  accordingly. 

2.  Adjustments  among  formed  ectoplasmic  organelles 

Correlated  with  the  reconstitution  of  the  normal  stentor  shape 
are  shifts  and  adjustments  of  formed  feeding  organelles  and 
holdfasts.  Figure  60  illustrates  the  major  tendencies. 

Separated  organelles  migrate  together,  like  to  like,  in  spite  of 
the  intervening  ectoplasmic  striping.  In  fact,  the  lateral  striping 
co-operates  or  may  even  produce  these  shifts  by  resorptive 
shortening  between  the  parts  and  extension  elsewhere.  Isolated 
mouthparts  and  membranellar  bands  may  travel  a  long  way  to 
join  with  or  even  break  into  a  major  set  of  feeding  organelles. 
Stentors  in  which  the  left  half  was  rotated  180°  and  healed  securely 
to  the  right  nevertheless  could  sometimes  gradually  return  to  the 


212 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Fig.  6o.   Adjustments  among  formed  ectoplasmic  organelles. 

A.  Regeneration  primordium  sector  with  intact  mouthparts 
grafted  to  stentor  from  which  mouth  was  excised.  Graft  shifts 
its  alignment,  anlage  is  resorbed  and  mouthparts  join  with 
membranellar  band  to  form  a  complete  set  of  feeding  organelles 

so  that  no  subsequent  regeneration  occurred. 

B.  Grafted  patch  with  wide  striping  and  section  of  mem- 
branellar band  (x).  The  peristomal  remnant  travels  all  the  way 
to  the  anterior  end  of  the  host  and  is  incorporated  into  the  host's 
band,  even  with  resorption  of  a  part  of  that  band  to  permit 

entrance. 

C.  Small  stentor,  with  mouth  excised,  grafted  to  another 
whose  mouthparts  were  cut  in  two.  Mouthparts  mend  as 
completely  normal  structure,  separate  membranellar  ring  moves 
to    anterior    end    of    larger    animal    and    is    incorporated,    no 

regeneration  following. 

D.  In  parabiotic  graft  of  two  stentors  the  feeding  organelles 
fuse  in  spite  of  intervening  striping  and  parts  of  both  membra- 
nellar bands  are  resorbed  to  make  a  single  frontal  field. 


FUSION    MASSES    OF    WHOLE    STENTORS  213 

normal  orientation  (Tartar,  1957c)  and,  remarkably,  the  same 
behavior  is  shown  in  operated  early  sea  urchin  embryos 
(Horstadius,  1950).  These  shifts  are  as  if  like  parts  exert  a  strong 
**  attraction  "  for  each  other,  and  their  coming  together  is  an 
important  step  in  the  unification  of  a  fusion  mass. 

Selective  resorption  of  parts  occurs  not  only  on  the  lateral  stripes 
but  also  within  the  joined  heads.  When  two  sets  of  feeding  organelles 
become  tightly  apposed,  first  those  sections  of  the  two  membranellar 
bands  are  resorbed  which  permit  the  formation  of  a  single  ring 
and  frontal  field.  Extra  tails  are  resorbed  or  sloughed,  or  they  may 
lose  their  separate  identities  by  fusion.  In  all  these  precise  adjust- 
ments between  the  parts  of  grafted  cells  we  see  the  specific  acts  by 
which  wholeness  is  achieved. 

3.  Larger  masses  and  reduction  of  oral  valency 

Grafts  of  5  to  100  animals  were  necessarily  of  random  orientation 
and  displayed  several  interesting  emergent  characteristics  which 
are  shown  in  Fig.  61. 

Most  obvious  is  that  grafts  of  6  or  more  animals  cannot  attain 
the  unitary  shape  and  giant  individualities  are  not  achieved. 
Instead,  the  general  impression  is  that  of  bas  reUef  sculpturing,  as 
if  each  set  of  stripes  were  able  to  make  an  individual  hump  in  the 
over-all  contour.  Although  Stentor  is  able  to  make  perfect  forms 
in  tiny  fragments,  it  is  apparently  unable  to  cope  with  a  mass  much 
larger  than  it  would  ever  encounter  in  nature.  This  is  not  because 
such  masses  are  necrotic.  Their  limitations  seem  to  be  morpho- 
genetic  rather  than  physiological.  Either  they  represent  simply  a 
self-defeating  jumble  or  the  upper  size  limit  to  form  development 
and  regulation  bears  in  itself  important  theoretical  implications. 
Lillie's   ''  minimal   organization   mass  "   seems  to   have   lost  its 

E.  Similar,  showing  integration  accomplished  by  resorption 
in  only  one  membranellar  band.    Apparently,  parts  of  the  band 

are  resorbed  when  they  do  not  subtend  lateral  striping. 

F.  Adjustment  in  a  graft  complex,  showing  how  just  those 
portions  of  the  membranellar  bands  are  resorbed  which  make 

for  an  integrated  frontal  field. 

G.  Product  of  graft  of  two  stentors  in  early  division.   Acces- 
sory tail-pole  and  holdfast  move  posteriorly  but  are  eventually 

resorbed  (x). 


214 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Fig.  6i.   Large  fusion  masses  of  S.  coerideus. 

A.  Graft  of  12  stentors,  heads  removed,  indicating  bas-relief 
sculpturing  or  partial  emergence  of  constituent  body  shapes. 

B.  Graft  of  14  stentors,  regenerated,  showing  unusually  long 
garlands  of  membranelles  without  formation  of  mouthparts. 

C.  1 5-mass,  now  organized  into  a  bipolar  system  and  with  oral 

valency  reduced  to  seven.    (After  Tartar,  1954.) 

significance  from  the  consideration  that  the  limit  to  size  of  regenera- 
tion is  simply  that  complete  animals  cannot  be  made  of  very  few 
parts  of  invariant  size,  but  there  may  w^ell  be  a  maximum  organiza- 
tion mass  beyond  which  anything  like  the  typical  stentor  form 
cannot  be  realized. 

Although  they  do  not  organize  into  single  giants,  larger  masses 
show  a  tendency  towards  unification  in  the  reduction  of  their  oral 
valency,  number  of  primordia  formed  decreasing  greatly  with  the 
number  of  individuals  grafted.  A  1 5-mass  for  example  produced 
only  7  primordia,  and  a  5 5-mass  had  between  5  and  10  anlagen  in 
successive  reorganizations.  These  great  reductions  in  the  number 
of  oral  differentiations  have  yet  to  be  adequately  explained. 
Perhaps  some  of  the  primordium  sites  join  together  as  one.  Or  it 
may  be  that  in  larger  masses  there  is  for  some  reason  a  competition 
betw^een  primordium  sites,  with  fewer  becoming  effective  in  pro- 
ducing anlagen.  Partly  responsible,  too,  may  be  the  fact  that  oral 
differentiation  favors  the  upper  surface ;  for  these  large  masses  did 
not  wheel  about  through  the  water  but  remained  on  the  bottom 
always  with  the  same  side  uppermost. 


FUSION    MASSES    OF    WHOLE    STENTORS  215 

4.  Incomplete  oral  differentiation 

When  fifteen  or  more  stentors  were  grafted  together  there  was  no 
longer  adequate  mouthparts  formation.  Primordia  were  few  and 
unusually  long,  forming  extensive  garlands  of  oral  cilia  stretched 
across  the  mass  (Fig.  6ib).  There  was  some  indication  that  the 
membranelles  in  these  bands  were  not  completely  formed,  though 
this  has  not  been  ascertained.  But  it  was  obvious  that  formation  of 
mouthparts  was  inhibited.  Since  induction  of  these  parts  is  deter- 
mined by  a  normal  relation  of  the  anlagen  to  the  axis  of  the  cell, 
the  presence  of  numerous  cell  axes  running  in  random  directions 
and  cancehng  each  other  in  their  polar  influences  may  be  responsible 
for  the  astomatous  development  of  the  feeding  organelles  in  large 
masses. 

5.  Absence  of  fission 

Random  masses  containing  more  than  five  stentors  never  showed 
any  attempt  to  undergo  fission.  This  is  rather  surprising  for  two 
reasons.  First,  the  masses  are  very  large  and,  although  increase  in 
size  is  not  in  itself  invariably  stimulative  of  division,  one  might 
expect  that  a  very  exaggerated  volume  could  be  so.  Second, 
multiple  fission  would  seem  to  be  the  easiest  way  for  a  mass  to 
resolve  its  difficulties,  yet  this  does  not  occur.  But  when  masses  are 
cut  into  pieces  about  the  size  of  a  normal  stentor  they  promptly 
regenerate  normal  singles,  a  test  which  shows  that  no  irreversible 
pathology  occurs  within  large  fusion  complexes.  Faure-Fremiet 
(1945  a)  attributed  similar  failure  in  simpler  complexes  to  their 
heteropolar  arrangement,  which  permits  the  establishment  of  no 
single  plane  of  fission.  Whatever  the  reason,  the  elimination  of  the 
capacity  to  divide  should  make  the  study  of  fusion  masses  fruitful 
in  searching  for  the  basis  of  fission.  In  this  connection  one  is 
reminded  of  an  hypothesis  by  Berglas  (1957)  that  cancerous 
proliferation  might  be  stopped  by  capitalizing  on  the  avidity  of 
cancerous  cells,  causing  their  overgrowth  to  such  a  size  that  divi- 
sion is  no  longer  possible. 

6.  Tubes  and  ciliated  vacuoles 

In  these  unique  intracellular  formations  the  morphogenetic 
capacities  of  Stentor  seem  to  be  extended  beyond  what  is  ever 
normally  expressed.  The  tubes  extend  deep  into  the  endoplasm 


2l6 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


but  usually  open  on  the  surface,  while  the  vacuoles  are  wholly 
internal  though  they  may  break  through  the  surface  later.  Both 
are  lined  with  apparently  normal  ectoplasmic  structure:  pigment 
stripes  alternating  with  ciliary  rows,  and  contractility  was 
sometimes  noticed  in  the  tubes. 

These  remarkable  structures  were  first  observed  in  masses  of 
stentors  (Tartar,  1954).  The  tubes,  at  least,  can  occur  in  single 
individuals.  One  day  I  isolated  a  very  abnormal  coeruleus  which 
was  apparently  the  result  of  an  incomplete  fission,  and  on  the  next 
day  the  cell  was  seen  to  be  filled  with  elaborate  internal  tubules 
(Fig.  62A).  One  tube  opened  where  the  mouth  should  have  been 
and  was  therefore  like  an  exaggerated  gullet.  There  seemed  to  be 
other  tubes  with  many  convolutions  which  arose  separately  and 


Fig.  62.    Interior  tubes  and  vesicles  in  S.  coeruleus. 
A.    Front  and  back  views  of  case  apparently  from  aborted 
fission  which  developed  complex  system  of  multiple  tubules, 
blue-green  in  color  because  lined  with  ectoplasm. 


FUSION    MASSES    OF    WHOLE    STENTORS  217 

opened  to  the  outside  through  the  ectoplasm  near  the  posterior  end. 
These  tubes  were  blue-green  in  color  and  obviously  lined  with 
ectoplasm.  In  grafted  pairs  one  or  two  tubes  sometimes  appeared 
adventitiously  (b).  Sometimes  the  tubes  had  a  neat  opening  through 
the  ectoplasm  at  both  ends  (c).  Usually  they  opened  near  the 
posterior  pole  and  extended  forward,  suggesting  gullet  formation 
in  the  normal  site  of  oral  differentiation.  Their  appearance  may 
represent  acts  of  gullet  formation  entirely  dissociated  from  anlagen 
development. 

Internal  ciliated  vacuoles  are  equally  surprising.  These  were 
often  found  in  large  fusion  masses  and  may  have  been  due  to  the 
accumulation  of  water  inside.  The  vacuoles  seemed  at  first  to  have 
structureless  walls,  but  they  soon  became  lined  with  typical  striped, 
ciliated  ectoplasm,  as  could  easily  be  demonstrated  by  slicing 

B.  Graft  of  two  enucleated  stentors  which  developed  a  single 
tube,  opening  posteriorly,  extending  forward  through  the 
endoplasm,  and  lined  with  ectoplasmic  striping.  The  tube 
contracted  and  extended  with  the  mass,  twisted  through  a  90° 
arc  autonomously,  and  seemed  to  "breathe"  by  independently 
enlarging  and  narrowing.  Elaboration  of  the  structure  in  absence 

of  a  nucleus  is  paradoxical. 

C.  Tube  with  neat  opening  through  the  ectoplasm  at  each 

end,  developed  in  a  3-mass. 

D.  Appearance  of  vesicle  in  a  fusion  mass.  Initially  the 
vacuole  seems  to  consist  of  a  simple  membrane  enclosing  fluid. 
Later  it  becomes  lined  with  ectoplasmic  structure  demonstrated 
by  ciliary  circulation  of  mass  of  shed  pigment  granules  within 

and  by  transection  to  expose  ectoplasmic  striping. 

E.  Mass  with  two  vesicles,  one  of  which  has  broken  through 
the   surface,    the   collapsed   lining   becoming   continuous   with 

outside  ectoplasm  and  forming  deep,  ear-like  cavity. 

F.  Reorganization  in  Cyathodiniiim .  Cortical  ciliary 
apparatus  is  resorbed  and  a  new  one  formed  inside  as  a  vesicle, 
lined  with  cilia  and  endosprits,  which  evaginates  through  the 
lateral  surface  and  produces  a  new  cell  axis  at  right  angles  to  the 
old.    In  division  2  endocellular  ciliary  anlagen  are  formed  which 

move  to  opposite  side.    (After  Lucas,  1932). 

G.  Odd  formation  of  tubes  and  vesicles  lined  with  pigmented 
ectoplasm  and  resembling  an  "archenteron"  with  one  opening. 
Differentiation    of    the    oral    anlage    was    incomplete.     (After 

Tartar,  1954). 


21 8  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    ST  ENTOR 

through  them.  Invariably  there  was  a  shedding  of  pigment 
granules  into  the  interior  and  these  clumps  of  blue-green  debris 
circulated  around  continuously  in  an  orderly  manner  by  action  of 
the  cihary  lining  (Fig.  62D).  There  was  no  evidence  of  oral  cilia  or 
of  mouthparts  differentiation.  Several  vacuoles  could  be  present 
together  in  one  mass,  and  individual  vesicles  sometimes  increased 
in  size  as  if  growing  and  subjecting  the  mass  to  great  tension  as 
indicated  by  the  spherical  form  assumed.  After  attaining  consider- 
able size  the  vacuoles  often  broke  through  the  surface  and  their 
ectoplasm  became  continuous  with  that  of  the  outside,  giving  the 
appearance  of  ''  ears"  because  of  their  depth  and  folds  (e). 

In  this  evagination,  as  in  their  origin,  the  ciliated  vacuoles 
strikingly  recall  the  unusual  mode  of  cytodifferentiation  in 
Cyathodinium  as  described  by  Lucas  (1932).  During  normal 
reorganization  and  division  in  this  ciliate  one  or  two  ciliary  anlagen 
arise  internally,  develop  cilia  projecting  into  the  vacuolar  space, 
then  evaginate  to  the  outside  in  orderly  manner  so  as  to  produce  a 
new  ciliation  at  a  different  axis  for  the  reorganized  animal  or  the 
two  daughter  cells  (Fig.  62F).  In  both  Cyathodinium  and  Stentor, 
development  of  internal  ciliation  quite  separate  from  contact  with 
the  ectoplasm  poses  a  test  of  the  hypothesis  of  the  genetic  con- 
tinuity of  kinetosomes.  But  whether  the  basal  bodies  of  the  cilia 
arise  de  novo^  or  develop  from  division  products  of  the  surface 
kinetosomes  wandering  into  the  interior,  would  be  difficult  to 
decide. 

It  is  also  possible  that  tubes  and  vacuoles  may  have  arisen  from 
bits  of  ectoplasm  thrust  into  the  interior  during  the  process  of 
grafting  stentors.  In  several  instances  (unpublished)  when  I  tucked 
pieces  of  ectoplasm  inside  the  cell,  tubes  and  ciliated  vacuoles 
resulted.  This  observation  is  especially  interesting  as  suggesting 
that  internal  ectoplasm  can  grow  and  even  undergo  an  orderly 
disposition  into  tubes  and  spheres.  Growth,  naturally,  would  be 
from  the  morphologically  inner  surface  of  such  pieces.  Cannibalized 
stentors,  though  not  at  first  enclosed  in  food  vacuoles,  are  digested 
instead,  since  their  "  growth  surface  "  never  contacts  the  endo- 
plasm  of  the  predator.  And  conversely,  ciliated  vesicles  can  persist 
and  develop  because  they  are  "  turned  inside  out  ". 

In  a  special  case,  tube  and  vacuole  formation  seemed  to  have 
combined  in   a  most  unusual  mass  which  showed  a  structure 


FUSION    MASSES    OF    WHOLE    STENTORS  219 

resembling  an  "  archenteron  ",  with  an  ''  appendix  "  and  a  tube 
connecting  to  the  exterior  (Fig.  620).  Ahhough  fusion  masses  of 
stentors  become  increasingly  unable  to  reconstitute  the  normal 
form,  they  seem  for  this  very  reason  to  be  set  free  to  express 
unusual  types  of  cytoplasmic  differentiation. 


CHAPTER    XIII 

RECONSTITUTION    IN 
DISARRANGED    STENTORS 

CiLiATES  are  often  cited  as  achieving  in  complexity  of  structure 
and  multiplicity  of  function  the  highest  elaboration  of  the  cell  as 
a  unit,  choosing  Epidinium  as  the  ultimate.  Stentors,  with  their 
elaborate  feeding  organelles,  complex  kinetics,  ribbon  bundles  and 
M-bands  in  the  clear  stripes,  and  granular  bands  of  varying  width 
and  taper  such  that  any  part  of  the  ectoplasm  is  theoretically 
identifiable  with  reference  to  its  position  in  the  orderly  whole,  are 
not  far  behind.  Yet  in  spite  of  the  cogency  and  high  development 
of  the  cortical  pattern,  stentors  can  sustain  and  recover  from  drastic 
disruptions  of  this  exquisitely  organized  ectoplasmic  structure. 
Nor  is  reconstitution  accomplished  by  the  easier  way  of  resorbing 
existing  cortical  differentiations  and  starting  afresh,  as  in  Bursaria 
truncatella  in  which  excessive  injuries  lead  to  encystment  followed 
by  complete  reconstruction,  according  to  Lund  (19 17).  Instead, 
the  cut  up  and  disarranged  parts  of  stentors  largely  persist  as  such 
and  apparently  perform  remarkable  shifts  and  reorientations  and 
rejoinings  in  a  usually  highly  successful  recovery  of  the  normal 
pattern  of  the  cell.  This  performance  in  fact  suggestively  parallels 
the  reconstitution  by  dissociated  sponges  and  disaggregated  tissue 
cells  of  organized,  functional  units. 

I.  Minced  stentors 

The  most  drastic  operation  conceivable  with  Stentor  is  rather 
easily  accomplished.  The  ectoplasm  can  be  cut  into  as  many  as  a 
hundred  separate  patches  by  slashing  deeply  through  the  surface 
of  the  cell  with  the  sharp  point  of  a  glass  needle.  After  many  cuts, 
large  patches  will  have  been  circumscribed  and  **  float  "  free  on 
the  endoplasm.  When  these  in  turn  are  repeatedly  transected,  the 
needle  not  only  severs  the  formed  structures  but  also  pushes  the 
patches  into  gross  disarrangements  with  reference  to  one  another 


220 


RECONSTITUTION    IN    DISARRANGED    STENTORS       221 

and  the  striped  surface  comes  to  have  the  appearance  of  fields  seen 
from  the  air.  Randomness  can  be  increased  by  first  cutting  the 
cell  transversely  and  rotating  the  anterior  half  iSo""  on  the  posterior; 
after  healing,  then  recutting  longitudinally  and  rotating  the  left 
half  on  the  right.  Quarters  of  the  cell  are  thus  transposed  and 
disoriented  before  the  mincing. 

In  some  of  the  first  experiments  of  this  type  (Tartar,  1941a,  b) 
it  was  found  that  stentors  with  two  heads  or  two  tails  could  be 
produced  from  singles,  and  an  analogy  was  drawn  between  this 
result  and  the  consequence  of  inverting  embr^^os  in  the  2-celled 
stage,  by  which  twins  are  produced.  Weisz  (1951a)  had  found  that 
excessive  cutting  injuries  in  grafting  only  resulted  in  death  of  the 
specimen,  but  evidently  the  conditions  of  experiment  were  not 
optimal.  Further  studies  (Tartar,  1956c)  revealed  remarkable 
reconstitutions  and  allow  us  to  say  something  of  how  they  are 
brought  about. 

After  minceration  a  stentor  has  a  knobby  or  fascetted  appearance 
from  the  patchiness  of  the  striping,  which  again  substantiates  that 
the  over-all  shape  of  the  cell  is  determined  by  the  arrangement  of 
the  ectoplasmic  striping  (Fig.  63A).  Within  a  few  hours  the  patches 
begin  reorientation,  with  their  striping  becoming  more  or  less 
parallel.  Although  this  point  could  not  be  tested,  it  seems  likely 
that  the  arrangement  of  pieces  becomes  homopolar,  like  so  many 
tiny  magnets.  The  gradual  nature  of  this  process  suggests  that  the 
position  of  the  new  polar  axis  is  established  statistically  at  first, 
by  any  group  of  patches  which  by  chance  happens  to  be  similarly 
oriented  and  therefore  can  form  a  "  field  "  whose  influence  might 
then  spread  to  adjoining  sections  to  bring  them  into  corresponding 
orientation.  With  this  shifting,  patches  soon  appear  much  larger 
than  originally,  and  this  can  be  attributed  to  their  joining  together 
as  they  come  into  parallel  and  homopolar  orientation.  Areas 
bearing  wide  pigment  stripes  do  not  form  a  continuous  structural 
union  with  fine-stripe  areas,  but  only  Hke  with  Hke.  Although  it 
would  be  difficult  to  observe  minor  resorption  of  patches,  it  is 
apparent  that  there  is  no  large  scale  dedifferentiation. 

As  the  cut  areas  move  so  their  stripes  become  parallel,  a  visible 
polarit}'  appears  as  the  mass  elongates  in  one  direction  and  a  hold- 
fast appears  at  the  end  of  a  projecting  point.  Oral  regeneration 
never  begins  until  a  definite  locus  of  stripe  contrast  of  considerable 


222 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    ST EN TOR 


Fig.  63.    Reconstitution  in  minced  S.  coeruleus. 


A.  Realignment  and  rejoining  of  pattern,  a:  Operation, 
consisting  of  repeated  cutting  with  point  of  a  glass  needle  until 
lateral  striping  is  reduced  to  scattered  patches.  Holdfast  and 
feeding  organelles  were  removed,  b:  Patches,  numbering  about 
50  are  at  first  separated  by  endoplasm.  c:  Patches  healing 
together  and  cell-shape  knobby  because  of  striping  running  in 
multiple  directions,  d:  Indication  of  a  tail  pole  and  axis  with 
patches  aligning  in  parallel  and  joining  when  of  the  same  type 

(e.g.  wide-stripe  areas  with  wide  striping). 

B.  Subsequent  regeneration  in  a  similar  case.  An  oral 
primordium  appears  as  soon  as  a  sufficient  locus  of  stripe-width 
contrast  was  re-established  (6  hours)  and  the  anlage  follows  the 
course    of    this    l.s.c.     Second    sketch    shows    nearly    normal 

specimen  one  day  after  operation. 

C.  Intact  head  grafted  to  minced  mass  of  two  stentors  minus 
heads  and  tails.  Three  days  later  the  specimen  became  as  shown, 
striping  normalized  on  ventral  (oral)  side,  still  irregular 
anteriorly  on  dorsal  side.  Axis  seems  to  be  established  by  the 
engrafted  head  but  head  and  bordering  stripes  apparently  have 


RECONSTITUTION    IN    DISARRANGED    STENTORS         223 

length  appears.  Even  if  the  head  had  previously  been  excised  and 
the  animals  minced  just  before  the  anlage  was  due  to  appear,  the 
primordium  v^as  still  not  formed  until  considerable  reorientation 
had  occurred.  But  if  a  stentor  is  minced  and  the  mouthparts 
excised  at  the  same  time  the  primordium  can  and  often  does  appear 
within  the  normal  time  of  4  hours,  so  that  cutting  of  the  striping 
and  its  subsequent  rearrangement  does  not  seem  to  interfere  in 
any  way  with  the  activation  and  preparation  of  the  cell  for  pri- 
mordium formation.  All  the  fine-stripe  patches  may  not  aggregate 
in  one  place  and  therefore  two  primordia  may  be  formed  producing 
a  double  stentor  from  a  single.  Oral  regeneration  seems  to  proceed 
normally  whenever  an  l.s.c.  is  estabhshed  to  determine  where  the 
anlage  is  to  be  placed  and  it  was  noted  that  without  exception  the 
primordium  does  appear  in  an  l.s.c.  Such  loci  may  be  much  dis- 
torted due  to  the  original  disarrangement,  and  the  anlage  faithfully 
follows  their  contorted  contour  (Fig.  63B).  The  specimen  therefore 
does  not  wait  until  it  has  reestablished  perfect  order  in  the  striping 
but  regenerates  as  soon  as  possible  and  makes  further  adjustments 
later. 

When  all  but  the  primordium  of  regenerating  stentors  was 
thoroughly  minced  there  was  no  resorption  of  the  anlage,  which 
continued  to  develop,  though  often  slowly;  but  the  membranellar 
band  formed  was  usually  distorted.  This  indicates  that  the  state 
of  activation  is  not  nullified  by  severe  cutting,  but  that  orderly 
striping  is  required  for  normal  deployment  of  the  developing 
feeding  organelles.  Even  if  the  regeneration  primordium  itself 
was  cut  in  two,  the  parts  usually  rejoined  and  development 
continued  to  rather  successful  regeneration. 

Specific  inhibition  of  oral  primordium  formation  by  intact 
feeding  organelles  occurred  even  though  the  cell  was  minced.  This 
was  demonstrated  by  grafting  intact  heads  to  singles  and  2-masses 

no  strong  orienting  influence  on  adjacent  patches.  Specimen 
survived  8  days  without  reorganizing,  and  hence  oral  inhibition 
of  primordium  formation  was  effective  though  lateral  striping  cut 
into  patches. 
D.  Mince  graft  of  5  whole  stentors  achieves  axis  by  6  hours, 
regenerates  as  a  doublet  and  begins  dividing  as  a  doublet  2  days 
later.     Integration   of  shape  is  better  than  in  grafts  of  5  not 

minced. 


224  "T^E    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

after  they  were  minced.  Often  no  primordium  appeared  (Fig.  63c), 
or  only  days  later.  The  grafted  head  became  harmoniously 
integrated  with  the  minced  host,  and  yet  grafting  of  heads  or 
primordium-site  sectors  or  large  areas  of  intact  striping  did  not 
seem  to  hasten  the  gradual  re-alignment  of  the  patches. 

Minced  2-masses  like  grafted  pairs  produced  i,  2  or  3  primordia 
upon  regeneration.  In  most  cases  two  were  formed,  in  some  cases 
only  one,  and  very  rarely  3.  Again,  the  oral  valency  seems  to  be 
simply  an  expression  of  the  probability  of  obtaining  more  than  one 
area  of  fine  striping  in  the  reconstituted  graft  complex.  Mincing 
a  fusion  mass  in  fact  definitely  favors  attainment  of  unitary  shape. 
A  minced  25 -mass  formed  a  rather  unified  fan  shape  with  single 
axis  (Tartar,  1954,  Fig.  33B),  though  large,  unminced  masses 
never  achieved  anything  like  the  normal  form.  Two  5-masses, 
minced,  became  doublets  with  single  conical  shapes,  much  in 
contrast  to  the  bizarre  forms  produced  when  such  masses  are  not 
minced  (Fig.  63D).  Minced  masses,  unlike  minced  singles,  seem 
to  have  a  better  chance  of  producing  a  single  shape  when  all  traces 
of  the  original  axes  have  been  obliterated,  and  this  inference  is 
substantiated  by  the  confusion  of  mildly  disarranged  stentors, 
presently  to  be  described.  The  response  to  these  operations 
demonstrates  an  astonishing  capability  of  thoroughly  disorganized 
stentors  to  regenerate  and  to  reconstitute  the  normal,  orderly 
arrangement  of  the  ectoplasmic  pattern,  even  within  a  single  day, 
after  all  the  complex  ciliary,  contractile,  conductive  and  other 
differentiations  of  the  ectoplasm  have  been  cut  into  tiny  pieces 
scattered  at  random. 

Remarkable,  too,  is  the  possibility  of  the  reverse  process,  in 
which  organization  is  sacrificed  to  autonomous  disorganization. 
Several  instances  have  been  found  in  which  individual  coeruleus 
responded  to  certain  treatments  by  spontaneously  transforming  the 
orderly  striping  into  a  generally  disarranged  patchiness  much  as 
if  the  cell  had  been  minced  (unpublished).  The  two  instances  from 
cutting  operations  are  shown  in  Fig.  64.  The  same  effect  was 
sometimes  produced  by  treatment  with  dilute  salt  solutions  (see 
Fig.  71).  If  these  responses  are  reproducible,  we  have  an  oppor- 
tunity to  explore  the  significance  of  this  peculiar  break-up  of 
structure,  so  greatly  in  contrast  to  the  general  tendency  of  stentors 
to  integrate  themselves  into  an  orderly  pattern.  This  behavior 


RECONSTITUTION    IN    DISARRANGED    STENTORS         22^ 


Fig.  64.  Transient  autonomous  disorganization  of  shape  pattern. 

A.  a:  Left  half  of  stage-3  divider  rotated  on  right,  h:  Fission 
blocked  but  further  primordium  formation,  leading  only  to  3 
incomplete  oral  differentiations  in  addition  to  original  mouth- 
parts  {x).  c:  Reorganized  singly,  with  fair  stomatogenesis  and 
good  striping,  d:  On  day  4  the  lateral  striping  except  in  the  oral 
meridian  was  broken  into  patches  quite  as  if  minced.  This 
condition  was  later  corrected  to  normal;  and  the  specimen 
eventually   divided,    one   of  the   products   also   then   dividing, 

therefore  apparently  an  instance  of  postponed  fission. 

B.  a:  Sector  with  stage-3  regeneration  primordium  and  8 
nuclear  nodes  grafted  transversely  onto  an  enucleated  stage-3 
regenerator.  Both  primordia  were,  paradoxically,  resorbed. 
Two  new  anlagen  appeared,  joined  and  gave  fair  differentiation 
of  feeding  organelles  (6)  but  the  striping  became  noticeably 
patchy,   c:  Reorganized  now  with  striping  aligned  but  with  four 

tail-poles.    Further  normalization  occurred  later. 


recalls,  in  a  possibly  significant  parallel,  the  normal  fragmentation 
of  the  cortical  striping  and  kinetics  in  large  forms  of  the  ciliate 
Ichthyophthirius.  Patches  so  produced  then  become  the  ciliation 
of  multiple  daughter  cells,  according  to  the  account  of  Mugard 
(1948).  But  in  Stentor,  the  animals  seemed  to  be  able  to  recover 
after  passing  through  a  period  of  self-trituration,  as  they  do  from 
minceration. 


226 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


2.  Other  disarrangements  of  the  normal  cell  pattern 

When  gross  parts  of  the  stentor  cell  are  shifted  with  respect  to 
one  another  in  operations  much  more  simple  than  total  mincing, 
the  effects  on  form  are  usually  far  more  enduring  and  bizarre. 
Original  longitudinal  and  transverse  axes  are  apparently  retained 
in  the  large  parts  and  fall  into  conflict  with  each  other.  Gruber 
(1885a)  had  shown  that  in  stentors  suffering  a  single  cut  the  parts 
could  shift  upon  each  other  to  produce  doublish  forms,  and 
Ishikawa  (1912)  produced  these  and  large  lateral  flanges  by  slicing 
into  coeruleus  and  holding  the  split  parts  separated  for  a  few 
minutes  so  that  they  then  did  not  heal  in  place.  Here  we  shall 
simply  offer  two  new  cases  which  are  typical. 

Figure  65A  shows  a  coeruleus  which  was  simply  split  longitu- 
dinally yet  it  never  recovered  the  normal  form  before  it  eventually 
died  of  starvation.  The  other  case  (b)  was  of  a  stentor  which  had 
been  "  quartered  "  with  the  result  that  each  fourth  of  the  cell  was 
maximally  misplaced.  Gross  abnormality  resulted,  finally  leading 
to  the  formation  of  a  double  animal.  In  a  previously  cited  case  the 
same  operation  produced  a  doublet  with  reversed  asymmetry  on 


Fig.  65.  Gross  abnormalities  of  shape  produced  by  simple  shifts 
of  large  stripe  areas. 

A.  When  stentor  is  split  to  tail-pole,  and  halves  shift    by 
contraction,  healing  irregularly,  aberrant  form  is  produced  but 

later  corrected. 

B.  Anterior  half  rotated  180°  on  posterior  then  left  half  180° 
on  right.    Quartered  animal  became  very  abnormal  in  shape, 

later  converting  to  a  telobiotic  double  stentor. 


RECONSTITUTION     IN    DISARRANGED    STENTORS        227 

one  side  (see  Fig.  49).  Also  to  be  recalled  in  this  connection  is  the 
great  confusion  of  shape  when  cell  sectors  are  implanted  hetero- 
polar  in  stentors  (see  Fig.  54).  Disarrangement  of  large  areas  of 
ectoplasm  therefore  leads  to  much  more  confusion  than  mincing. 
Reorientation  of  such  areas  may  simply  be  more  difficult,  or  their 
polar  "  fields  "  may  be  so  strong  as  to  engender  major  conflicts 
within  the  cell. 

The  neatest  and  best  studied  disarrangement  of  the  pattern  of 
Stentor  is  that  in  which  the  anterior  half  of  the  stentor  is  rotated 
180°  on  the  posterior  (Tartar,  1956a;  Uhlig,  1959).  When  coeruleus 
is  selected  for  this  operation,  the  pigment  stripes  with  their  varying 
widths  can  be  used  to  identify  the  cortical  patterns  of  the  two  halves 
and  to  follow  the  changes  which  occur  in  them. 

The  nature  of  these  transformations  of  the  striping  depends  in 
part  on  whether  and  where  the  severed  stripes  may  join.  Using 
these  cases,  stentors  grafted  heteropolar  by  the  headless  anterior 
ends,  and  observations  on  minced  animals,  we  can  formulate 
provisionally  a  rule  for  the  union  of  lateral  stripes.  It  will  be 
recalled  that  the  complex  fibrous  structure  Hes  in  the  clear  bands 
and  that  the  pigment  stripes  appear  to  be  merely  the  spaces 
between  these  which  are  filled  in  with  the  colored  granules.  Yet  if 
discontinuities  in  pigment  stripes,  appearing  like  the  colorless 
fission  line,  can  be  taken  as  a  criterion  that  the  fibers  of  the  adjacent 
clear  bands  are  also  discontinuous,  then  it  seems  that  intimate 
structural  union  between  two  sections  of  ectoplasm  occurs  only 
when  the  abutting  pigment  stripes  are  of  equal  w^idth,  approxi- 
mately parallel,  and  homopolar.  Thus  in  heteropolar  grafts  there 
is  no  joining  of  pigment  stripes  even  w^hen  they  are  of  equal  width 
(see  Fig.  46E).  In  mincerates,  as  well  as  in  parts  of  the  normal 
"  ramifying  zone  "  of  Schuberg,  it  is  indicated  that  pigment  stripes 
of  equal  widths  do  not  join  if  they  are  at  an  angle  to  each  other 
(Fig.  63B).  And  in  anterior-rotated-on-posterior  grafts  there  is  a 
discontinuity  where  the  wide  stripes  of  one  half  abut  the  fine  stripes 
of  the  other,  while  in  those  places  where  stripes  are  of  equal  width 
they  join  and  become  continuous  (Fig.  66a).  As  will  be  noticed  in 
the  figures,  even  though  wide  and  narrow  pigment  stripes  do  not 
join,  there  is  the  appearance  of  a  strong  attraction  between  the  two. 
Characteristically  two  fine  stripes  move  so  as  to  subtend  one  wide 
stripe,  although  a  non-pigmented  line  continues  to  separate  them. 


228 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Fig.  66.    Consequences  of  rotating  anterior  part  i8o°  on  the 
posterior. 

A.  Equal  halves  rotated,  mouthparts  excised,  a:  Pigment 
stripes  of  like  width  join  and  mend,  wide  and  narrow  stripes 
match  up,  2  to  i,  without  joining,  b:  Regeneration  is  delayed 
because  membranellar  band  left  intact,  hence  single  primordium 
arising  only  in  relation  to  the  extending  posterior  striping, 
anterior  stripes  resorbing.  c:  Completion  of  regeneration  with 
anterior  striping  nearly  replaced  by  growth  of  posterior  striping. 

B.  Stentor  transected  somewhat  anterior  to  center;  anterior 
striping  resorbed  though  no  primordium  is  formed  since  feeding 
organelles  left  complete.  Head  therefore  does  not  make  anterior 
striping  dominant  yet  effectively  inhibits  anlage  formation  in 

the  posterior  portion,  isolated  by  rotation. 


RECONSTITUTION    IN    DISARRANGED    STENTORS         229 

The  operation  of  rotating  anterior  on  posterior  halves  was  first 
used  to  demonstrate  that  primordium  formation  can  occur  in  such 
loci  of  stripe  contrast  (Tartar,  1956a),  but  it  was  also  observed  that 
stripe  disharmonies  were  resolved  by  resorption  of  the  anterior 
striping  and  extension  of  the  posterior  to  take  its  place.  If  regenera- 
tion was  delayed  by  leaving  the  membranellar  band  intact,  the 
forward  resorption  of  the  anterior  ectoplasm  occurred  so  rapidly 
that  when  an  anlage  was  formed  it  appeared  only  in  the  primordium 
site  from  the  posterior  half  (Fig.  66a).  Even  when  regeneration  was 
not  induced,  anterior  striping  could  be  dissolved  as  it  was  replaced 
by  the  posterior  (b).  Alternatively,  in  some  cases  in  which  regenera- 
tion was  not  induced  the  striping  of  anterior  and  posterior  halves 
appeared  to  interpenetrate,  parts  of  both  anterior  and  posterior 
striping  being  preserved. 

Later  it  was  found  that  grafts  with  this  astonishing  interpenetra- 
tion  of  stripes  could  be  produced  quite  readily  (Tartar,  1959b). 
Figure  66c  shows  how  the  fine  line  zone  or  primordium  site  of 
each  half  plows  through  the  striping  of  the  other  half  as  it  extends 
in  length  and  gradually  reaches  the  opposite  pole.  Specimens  with 
two  good  primordium  sites  which  reorganize  as  doublets  are 
therefore  generally  produced.  Later  readjustments,  in  which  the 
fine  lines  of  either  side  become  wider,  then  lead  to  eventual 
recovery  of  the  single  form.  In  one  instance  the  animal  divided. 

C.  Stentor  cut  in  half,  fine-line  zones  interpenetrating  next 
day  to  reach  opposite  poles  of  the  cell,  with  result  that  two  loci 
of  stripe-width  contrast  are  extended  and  specimen  becomes  a 

doublet. 

D.  Front  and  back  views  of  dividing  specimen  with  interpene- 
trating stripes,  showing  how  fission  line  forms  indiflferent  to 

suture  between  stripes  of  the  rotated  halves. 

E.  Racial  difference  in  interpenetration  of  striping.  Same 
operation  as  in  c,  but  with  EUetsville  race.  First  sketch:  two 
days  after  operation  with  striping  still  unchanged.  Second :  i  ith 
day,  with  striping  now  running  pole  to  pole  forming  two  primor- 
dium sites,  one  with  reversed  asymrrietry  and  therefore  producing 

anlagen  which  gave  incomplete  stomatogenesis. 

F.  Stage-3  divider  cut  with  anterior  part  larger.  Specimen 
reorganizes  instead  of  dividing,  with  only  anterior  portion  of  the 
primordium  developing,  the  posterior  part  resorbed.    Posterior 

striping  is  gradually  resorbed  as  anterior  stripes  extend. 


230  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

Division  occurred  while  the  stripes  were  interpenetrating  and  the 
fission  Hne  did  not  follow  the  suture  but  cut  indiscriminately 
across  fine  and  broad  striping,  following  a  course  which  may  be 
called  typical  (d).  The  latter,  with  similar  cases,  shows  that  abnormal 
disharmonies  and  discontinuities  in  the  lateral  striping  do  not 
preclude  division  and  suggests  that  the  fission  line  is  determined 
by  some  agent  other  than  the  lateral  stripes  themselves.  Thus  the 
same  subcortical  forces  which  cause  predivision  of  the  carbo- 
hydrate reserves  in  the  neat  manner  already  described  may  impose 
a  severance  of  the  striping  lying  exterior  to  them  regardless  of  the 
nature  or  disposition  of  that  striping. 

Yet  the  most  interesting  questions  concern  how  the  highly 
structured  ectoplasm  can  permit  stripe  areas  to  slip  by  each  other, 
as  well  as  the  bearing  of  stripe  extensions  in  limited  places  on  the 
control  of  growth  throughout  the  cortex.  Moreover,  it  appears  that 
races  of  coeruleus  vary  in  the  ease  with  which  stripes  interpenetrate 
after  this  operation,  specimens  of  one  strain  remaining  as  grafted  (e) 
long  after  those  of  another  had  formed  doublets. 

Uhlig  (1959,  and  unpublished)  has  developed  this  type  of 
experiment  much  further,  by  transecting  coeruleus  at  different  levels 
before  rotating  the  two  parts.  He  substantiated  that  when  the  cut 
passes  through  the  place  of  origin  of  the  primordium  producing 
approximately  equal  halves  for  rotation,  the  anterior  striping  is 
generally  resorbed  as  the  posterior  stripes  extend  and  take  over.* 
When  a  posterior  cut  produces  an  anterior  component  about  four 
times  the  size  of  the  posterior,  anterior  striping  now  predominates 
and  extends  posteriorly,  replacing  the  original  tail-pole  striping 
which  is  resorbed.  The  case  shown  in  Fig.  66f  confirms  this 
finding.  A  dividing  stentor  was  transected  across  the  oral  end  of  the 
division  primordium  and  the  smaller  posterior  part  rotated  on  the 
larger.  The  tip  of  the  anlage  was  then  resorbed ;  the  larger  portion 
continued  development  and  led  to  reorganization  as  the  original 
posterior  striping  gradually  disappeared.  But  these  cases  were  not 
uniform  and  sometimes  there  was  an  interpenetration  of  stripes. 
Therefore  it  appears  that  in  these  grafts  there  is  a  delicate  balance 
between  the  two  systems  which  may  be  tripped  to  favor  the 


*  Uhlig  (i960)  claims  that  resorption  of  the  anterior  striping  proceeds 
from  the  anterior  ends  of  this  striping  and  not  from  the  suture. 


RECONSTITUTION     IN    DISARRANGED    STENTORS         231 

dominance  of  one  or  the  other  or  may  result  in  equiUbrium,  with 
the  striping  of  both  halves  retained  and  interpenetrating.  A  fine 
and  unnoticeable  difference  might  swing  the  balance  one  way  or 
the  other.  When  the  cell  was  so  cut  that  the  ratio  of  anterior  half 
to  posterior  was  about  3 : 2,  Uhlig  found  that  dominance  was 
exerted  by  neither  part  and  doublets  resulted  which  could  divide 
and  produce  more  doublets.  He  states  that  then  each  primordium 
site  ''  reorganized  "  completely,  but  perhaps  he  also  observed  what 
seems  to  me  to  be  the  case :  that  there  is  an  extension  of  each  half 
of  the  original  primordium  site  as  it  penetrates  through  the  stripes 
of  the  other  half.  He  interpreted  the  various  responses  as  an 
interaction  between  the  head-tail  gradient  and  the  transverse  or 
circumferential  gradient  in  stripe  width.  For  instance,  when  only 
the  posterior  end  of  the  cell  is  rotated,  its  circular  gradient  in  the 
immediate  neighborhood  of  the  steepest  end  of  the  tail-to-head 
gradient  is  apparently  obliterated. 

Experiences  wdth  this  type  of  operation  will  have  a  bearing  on 
the  analysis  of  axial  gradients  in  Stentor.  From  a  more  general 
standpoint  it  is  shown  that  stentors  have  still  further  resources,  in 
the  selective  resorption  or  interpenetration  of  stripes,  for  the 
reconstitution  of  their  normal  form  and  pattern. 


CHAPTER    XIV 

ANALYSIS    OF    STENTOR   THROUGH    ITS 
RESPONSE   TO   EXTERNAL   AGENTS 

Various  chemical  and  physical  treatments  of  living  stentors  have 
been  used  to  reveal  and  analyze  otherwise  inaccessible  aspects  of 
their  structure  and  behavior.  These  studies  are  classified  according 
to  objectives  of  the  investigation,  types  of  eflFects  produced,  or  the 
agent  used. 

I.  Action  of  the  membranellar  band 

To  immediate  observation,  the  most  impressive  activity  of 
attached  stentors  is  the  orderly  beating  of  the  large  membranelles 
in  beautiful  waves  of  metachronal  rhythm.  For  the  membranelles 
do  not  all  beat  together  in  the  same  phase  but  in  succession,  so 
that  at  any  one  instant  membranelles  in  the  eflFective  beating  stroke 
are  followed  by  others  successively  relaxed  in  the  recovery  stroke 
and  these  are  again  followed  by  organelles  in  the  effective  stroke, 
giving  the  impression  of  waves  originating  in  the  gullet  and  passing 
along  the  membranellar  band  to  its  terminus.  Hydrodynamically, 
this  type  of  beating  is  probably  the  most  efficient,  because  groups 
of  cilia  work  together  to  move  the  water  toward  the  mouth  but  this 
action  is  distributed  so  that  there  is  a  continuous  flow,  whereas  if 
all  membranelles  beat  in  the  same  phase  the  medium  would  move 
by  starts  and  stops. 

The  types  of  action  of  which  the  membranelles  are  capable  and 
the  variables  involved  are  shown  diagrammatically  in  Fig.  67. 
First,  the  membranelles  may  all  be  stopped  and  pointed  forward 
and  somewhat  inward,  when  stentor  is  swimming  backward  or 
has  momentarily  ceased  feeding  (b).  When  they  resume  beating 
they  do  so  at  first  individually  and  at  random,  soon  falling  into 
metachronal  rhythm.  Hence  each  membranelle  is  capable  of 
independent  beating.  The  number  of  strokes  per  second  is  the 
frequency  of  beating.  Presumably  the  amplitude  of  the  eflFective 

232 


ANALYSIS    OF    STENTOR 


233 


Stroke  may  vary  but  this  would  be  difficult  to  detect.  The  distance 
between  membranelles  in  the  same  phase  is  the  metachronal  waz'e 
length.  Speed  with  which  metachronal  rhythm  passes  along  the 
band  is  the  wave  velocity  and  is  equal  to  the  product  of  frequency 


hme  -  /requAncy  ot  bead: 
distance  -  ssripLiiiuLe 


A 


propulsive,  stroke  r^coveri/ 
l^AV£  LENGTH 


stroke 


■^  Wave  vetoed  If  =  ^-eqaen^i/  of  beat  X  wavelength- 


Fig.  67.   Actions  of  the  peristomal  membranelles. 
Analysis  of  successive  beating  or  metachronal  rhythm. 


B.  Swimming    backward    with    ciliary    beat    reversed    and 

membranelles  stopped  and  pointed  forward. 

C.  Forward  swimming  with  membranelles  active  and  pointing 

backward. 

D.  Coordination  in  transected  sections  of  the  peristome,  a: 
Metachronal  rhythm  maintained,  moving  distally  from  pace- 
maker in  the  oral  region,  b:  Isolated  section  sets  up  independent 
rhythm,  pace  set  by  proximal  membranelles.  c:  Beating  of 
membranelles  still  independent,  as  in  the  whole  peristome  when 
beating  recommences.    Rhythm  will  be  re-coordinated  by  new 

pacemaker  at  x. 


234  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

of  beat  and  wave  length.  Each  of  these  factors  is  variable.  In 
addition,  the  membranelles  can  be  oriented  to  point  outward  and 
backward  as  they  do  in  forward  swimming  (c). 

It  will  be  recalled  that  the  membranelles  are  rooted  in  triangular 
basal  plates  all  of  which  are  connected  by  an  inner  fiber.  It  was 
natural  for  early  microscopists  to  have  supposed  that  the  impulse 
producing  metachronal  rhythm  passed  along  this  fiber,  exciting 
one  membranelle  after  the  other;  but  there  are  at  least  two  argu- 
ments against  this  supposition.  The  wave  velocity  (roughly  700 /^ 
per  second)  is  slower  than  any  known  neuroid  transmission  (Sleigh, 
vide  infra).  And  second,  on  resuming  their  beat  the  membranelles 
do  not  start  at  once  in  metachronal  rhythm,  which  is  only  later 
established  after  a  brief  period  of  irregular  beating. 

Coordination  in  the  membranellar  band  of  S.  polymorphus  was 
the  subject  of  astute  investigations  by  Sleigh  (1956,  1957).  By 
several  approaches  he  shows  that  the  frequency  of  beating  of  the 
membranelles  is  dissociable  from  the  wave  velocity  or  rapidity  of 
transmission  of  the  impulse  from  one  membranelle  to  the  next. 
Both  frequency  and  wave  velocity  decreased  with  lower  tempera- 
ture but  the  decrease  was  more  rapid  in  the  frequency  of  beating. 
Increasing  viscosity  of  the  medium  by  addition  of  methyl  cellulose 
resulted  in  decreased  frequency  of  beating  but  no  change  in  the 
wave  velocity.  This  corresponds  to  expectations,  for  external 
resistance  should  decrease  the  frequency  of  stroke  without  affecting 
internal  mechanisms  of  transmission.  Magnesium  chloride 
increased  the  frequency  of  beating  without  affecting  the  wave 
velocity ;  and  with  aluminum  chloride  the  trivalent  ion  was  several 
times  more  effective  in  producing  the  same  response.  If  these 
metal  cations  may  be  regarded  as  reducing  the  internal  viscosity 
of  the  protoplasm  in  cilia,  increased  frequency  would  be  explained 
as  due  to  lower  internal  resistance.  Digitoxin  greatly  increased  the 
wave  velocity  but  only  slightly  increased  the  frequency  of  beat  and 
the  shape  of  the  effect- vs. -concentration  curves  was  different. 
Finally,  cutting  the  membranellar  band  interrupted  the  wave 
conduction  but  did  not  prevent  the  reappearance  of  metachronal 
rhythm  in  separated  sections  distal  to  the  gullet  (Fig.  67D).  This 
experiment  at  once  excluded  that  metachronal  waves  originate  only 
in  the  gullet  region  and  can  be  stopped  by  cutting  the  fiber  which 
connects  the  basal  plates  of  the  membranelles. 


ANALYSIS    OF    STENTOR  235 

Following  incision,  the  first  membranelle  distal  to  the  cut 
established  a  new  frequency  of  beating,  which  was  then  taken  up 
by  all  the  membranelles  in  the  isolated  section.  The  first  mem- 
branelle of  a  series  may  therefore  be  regarded  as  a  pacemaker  which 
determines  the  frequency  of  membranelles  distal  to  it.  Being 
separated  from  proximal  membranelles  the  pacemaker  can  establish 
its  own  intrinsic  rhythm,  often  different  in  different  sections. 
Usually,  its  rate  was  slower  than  that  of  the  membranelles  on  the 
gullet  side,  but  in  a  few  cases  it  was  more  rapid,  possibly  due  to 
excitation  through  injury.  In  the  intact  feeding  organelles,  the 
pacemaker  would  presumably  be  some  membranelle  within  the 
gullet.  In  this  region.  Sleigh  (1957)  found  that  the  wave  lengths 
and  wave  velocity  are  smaller  than  in  the  distal  lengths  of  the 
membranellar  band;  but  this  discrepancy  he  resolved  by  the 
observation  that  the  membranelles  are  also  closer  together  in  the 
gullet.  Therefore  the  number  of  membranelles  in  one  wave  length 
is  the  same  throughout  the  band  and  hence  the  number  stimulated 
per  second  is  the  same  regardless  of  their  density.  "  The  wave 
velocity  thus  depends  on  the  number  of  cilia  involved  in  the  trans- 
mission, and  not  on  the  linear  distance  traveled  by  the  metachronal 
wave  ".  This  is  further  evidence  that  the  cilia  themselves  are 
involved  in  transmission  of  the  metachronal  wave  and  not  the 
basal  fiber  connecting  the  basal  plates. 

Chemical  and  physical  treatments  thus  indicated  that  there  is  an 
intraciliary  excitation  which  is  separable  from  a  second  process, 
the  conduction  of  the  impulse  from  membranelle  to  membranelle. 
From  these  and  the  cutting  experiments.  Sleigh  proposed  the 
hypothesis  diagramed  in  Fig.  68.  Only  a  single  cilium  in  each 
membranelle  is  shown  for  presumably  the  closely  packed  cilia  of 
each  membranelle  work  together.  Each  cilium  would  then  be 
capable  of  spontaneous  beating  but  at  a  slower  frequency  than 
when  excited  by  interciliary  transmission.  Increasing  or  retarding 
frequency  of  beat  would  simply  alter  the  rapidity  of  ciHary  contrac- 
tion or  response  to  the  internal  state  of  excitation  and  therefore 
need  not  affect  the  rate  of  conduction  of  the  impulse  between  the 
motor  organelles.  On  the  contrary,  digitoxin,  by  decreasing  the 
threshold  of  excitability,  as  it  does  in  heart  muscle,  might  increase 
the  speed  of  excitation  and  therefore  lead  to  a  more  rapid  tripping 
off  of  the  conducted  impulse  so  that  wave  velocity  would  be  in- 


236  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

creased  without  much  affecting  the  frequency  of  beat.  The  general 
picture,  then,  is  not  of  a  row  of  effectors  joined  by  one  connecting 
nerve  or  neuroid  process,  but  of  a  series  of  triggers  which  fire  each 
other  in  succession. 


CiUu-m  of 
mem  br.anelle 


ciliary  roots  ot 
2)asBl  lamella 


bsLSaL 
fiber 


Fig.  68. 


Diagram  of  a  theory  of  metachronal  coordination. 
(After  Sleigh,  1957.) 


This  would  leave  the  basal  fiber  without  defined  function,  and 
Sleigh  does  not  even  mention  it.  Apparently  he  regards  the  conduc- 
tion as  simply  spreading  through  the  ectoplasm  between  the 
membranelles.  That  such  transmission  without  fibrous  connections 
is  possible  even  at  much  wider  dimensions  is  indicated  by  the 
membranellar  response  of  grafted  stentors.  Immediately  after  many 
stentors  were  grafted  together,  and  even  if  the  membranellar  bands 
are  cut  into  sections  of  various  lengths,  all  the  membranelles  in  the 
mass  were  observed  to  stop  and  start  together  as  the  cilia  simul- 
taneously reversed  or  beat  "  forward  ",  long  before  any  intimate 
structural  reconnections  could  have  been  made,  as  if  a  coordinating 


ANALYSIS    OF    STENTOR 


237 


influence  passed  like  a  flash  over  the  entire  surface  of  the  mass 
(Tartar,  1954).  Myonemes  respond  similarly,  components  of  a 
fusion  mass  contracting  together  almost  from  the  moment  of 
grafting  (Weisz,  1951a). 

One  approach  to  analyzing  what  the  functions  of  fibrous 
structures  associated  with  the  membranelles  may  be  is  provided 
by  the  selective  resorption  of  parts  of  bands  during  fusion  of  heads 
in  grafted  stentors.  In  the  specimen  shown  in  Fig.  69  the  resorbing 
membranelles  first  lost  their  metachronal  rhythm,  beating  irregu- 
larly in  a  local  area.  This  is  as  if  structures  responsible  for  this 


Fig.  69.  Loss  of  coordination  in  membranelles  anticipating 
resorption  of  portions  of  the  membranellar  band.  The  ends  of 
the  two  peristomes  which  were  resorbed  in  a  doublet  stentor  to 
fuse  the  frontal  fields  first  showed  independent  beating  of 
membranelles. 


type  of  coordination  were  the  first  to  become  dediflFerentiated,  for 
the  ectoplasm  presumably  retained  its  continuity. 

Other  responses  of  the  membranelles  to  chemical  treatments 
have  been  observed  (Tartar,  1957a).  In  solutions  of  1%  Nal  the 
membranelles  remained  continuously  stopped,  but  in  CaCl2  they 
kept  beating  vigorously  until  the  organelles  were  destroyed. 
Ethanol  stimulated  the  membranelles  to  keep  beating  even  while 
the  remainder  of  the  cell  was  being  destroyed,  confirming  the 
earlier  observation  of  Daniel  (1909).  This  activity  was  in  marked 
contrast  to  the  normal  avoiding  response  in  which  the  membra- 
nelles are  stopped.  In  MgCl2,  at  much  higher  concentrations  than 
used  by  Sleigh,  the  membranelles  continually  started  and  stopped 


238  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

at  a  rate  of  about  one  change  per  second  until  the  band  itself  was 
destroyed.  NiS04  in  very  weak  solution  is  an  effective  ciliary 
anaesthetic  for  protozoa  (see  Tartar,  1950);  body  cilia  and  mem- 
branelles  in  Stentor  were  stopped  in  weak  solutions,  but  although 
not  beating,  the  membranelles  keep  changing  their  orientation  in 
the  two  positions  shown  in  Fig.  67B  and  c.  This  reorientation  in 
membranelles  which  were  not  beating  was  most  striking  to 
observe  —  like  the  batting  of  eyelashes  —  and  it  should  also  be 
mentioned  that  the  body  contractions  of  the  stentor  were  in  no 
demonstrable  way  affected  by  NiS04.  Hence  the  unstriated  basal 
lamellae  and  associated  fibers  of  the  membranelles,  homologous 
with  the  striated  ciliary  rootlets  described  in  metazoa  by  Fawcett 
and  Porter  (1954),  rnay  be  contractile  (like  the  unstriated  ribbon 
bundles  of  the  clear  stripes)  and  serve  for  orienting  the  membra- 
nelles in  one  direction  or  another,  a  function  which  in  this  case 
seems  to  be  completely  dissociable  from  ciliary  beating. 

2.  Coordination  of  body  cilia 

Every  part  of  the  ciliated  ectoplasm,  without  endoplasm  or 
nucleus,  is  a  self-contained  coordinating  system.  This  was 
demonstrated  for  Stentor  and  Spirostomum  by  Worley  (1934)  who 
found  that  in  isolated  patches  the  ciha  could  start  and  stop,  reverse 
their  effective  stroke,  and  beat  in  metachronal  rhythm.  Treatment 
with  ciliary  anaesthetics  such  as  potassium  chloride  resulted  first 
in  loss  of  the  capacity  to  reverse,  then  of  metachronal  rhythm,  and 
finally  of  ciHary  beating  itself.  These  three  kinds  of  ciliary  action 
are  hence  dissociable.  Individual  activity  of  a  cilium  and  the  two 
types  of  coordinated  movement  of  cilia  therefore  are  probably  due 
to  separate  processes.  Reversal  of  beating  spread  instantaneously 
like  a  signal  passing  over  the  surface,  uninterrupted  by  incisions 
and  therefore  probably  not  mediated  by  conductile  fibers.  Meta- 
chronal waves  are  much  slower.  Hence  Worley  suggested  that  they 
are  mediated  by  interciliary  fibers,  specialized  structures  whose 
effectiveness  in  integrating  cilia  may,  paradoxically,  be  due  to 
their  slowing  down  interciliary  impulses.  In  Spirostomum^  the 
kinetics  of  which  closely  resemble  those  of  Stentor  (Randall,  1956), 
Worley  found  that  the  metachronal  beat  could  circumvent  surface 
cuts,  indicating  the  presence  of  transverse  connections  between 
rows  of  body  cilia. 


ANALYSIS    OF    STENTOR  239 

Reversal  of  beating  of  the  body  cilia  in  unattached  stentors  is 
immediately  manifested  in  backward  swimming  in  which  the 
effective  stroke  of  the  cilia  is  directed  forward  instead  of  backward. 
Merton  (1932,  1935)  made  an  extensive  study  of  the  effects  of 
various  salts  and  other  substances  in  compelling  stentors  to  swim 
backward.  The  species  used  wcreroeseli,  coeruleus,  and polymorphus. 

First  it  should  be  mentioned  that  distilled  water  alone  produced 
backward  swimming,  with  most  of  the  animals  disintegrating  in 
two  hours.  Peters  (1908)  had  early  shown  this  injurious  effect  of 
pure  water  on  coeruleus.  He  transferred  the  animals  every  15 
minutes  to  fresh  distilled  water  and  all  then  died  within  an  hour, 
death  occurring  not  by  swelling  of  the  whole  cell  but  by  the  forma- 
tion of  internal  vacuoles  w^hich  increased  in  size  and  led  to  a 
blistering  of  the  surface  with  final  disruption.  Death  he  attributed 
to  washing  out  of  the  salts  of  the  cell,  but  it  may  just  as  well  have 
been  due  to  other  osmotic  effects;  for  Jennings  (1902)  found  that 
sugars  killed  by  the  subtraction  of  water  and  that  there  is  no  effect 
at  first  but  only  after  a  sudden  contraction,  following  which  the 
animals  crumpled  and  decreased  in  volume. 

Therefore  Merton  made  up  his  solutions  in  tap  water  which  had 
no  effect  on  their  behavior  and  was  not  immediately  injurious.  He 
found  that  monovalent  cations  induced  reversal  of  ciliary  beating 
while  the  bivalent  cations  of  calcium  and  magnesium  did  not.  Thus 
weak  solutions  of  KCl  produced  a  continuous  backward  swimming. 
Using  their  chlorides,  the  monovalent  ions  tested  were  in  approxi- 
mately decreasing  order  of  effectiveness :  K>Rb>Cs>Na>NH4. 
Anions  also  had  some  effect  on  the  response.  Potassium  compounds 
were  compared,  and  the  order  of  decreasing  effect  of  the  anions  in 
promoting  ciliary  reversal  was 

C03>S04>C1>I,  NO3,  P04>Br>Ac. 

I  later  confirmed  these  results  in  regard  to  contrasting  effects  of 
monovalent  and  bivalent  cations  (Tartar,  1957a).  In  addition  I 
found  that  LiCl,  which  only  produced  disintegration  of  stentors 
for  Merton,  also  induced  conspicuous  backward  swimming.  And 
ammonium  acetate  in  strength  of  1%,  a  compound  not  tested  by 
Merton,  caused  the  most  prolonged  and  continuous  reversal  of  any 
of  the  compounds  used. 


240  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

Merton  also  tested  hydrochloric  acid,  fatty  acids,  saponin,  and 
certain  alkalis,  which  produced  only  injury  and  no  ciliary  reversal. 
Urea  and  sugars  also  gave  no  reversal,  and  this  I  can  confirm. 

Merton  regarded  the  induced  backward  movement  as  a  specific 
effect  of  the  monovalent  cations  on  the  cilium.  That  osmotic  effects 
are  not  involved  is  obvious  from  the  fact  that  the  type  of  ion  and 
not  its  concentration  is  crucial.  Nor  was  he  dealing  with  avoiding 
responses,  because  he  found  that  stentors  show  the  normal  tem- 
porary backing  up  even  when  they  encounter  calcium  chloride, 
but  this  compound  does  not  compel  the  continuous  backward 
movement  which  KCl  does.  Also,  the  reversal  in  KCl,  for  example, 
was  not  counteracted  by  adding  an  equivalent  amount  of  CaCl2. 
The  bearing  which  these  results  may  have  for  an  analysis  of  ciliary 
reversal  is  yet  to  be  clarified,  but  to  be  able  to  produce  reversal, 
immediate  and  prolonged,  is  a  beginning.  At  least  we  can  conclude 
that  the  mechanism  of  body  cilia  is  such  that  it  can  adapt  to  an 
abnormally  continuous  backward  beating  at  increased  intensity 
under  the  influence  of  reversing  agents. 

3.  Ciliary  anaesthesia 

It  has  already  been  mentioned  that  the  heavy  metal  salt  NiS04 
at  very  low  concentration  causes  reversible  paralysis  of  both  body 
cilia  and  membranelles  in  Stentor,  as  I  found  following  a  suggestion 
of  Gelei  (Tartar,  1950).  After  inducing  ciliary  reversal,  NaCl  and 
KCl  also  produce  partial  anaesthesia  of  the  cilia  (Merton,  1935) 
and  the  potassium  salt  seems  to  be  the  more  effective  for  this  use. 

Following  early  exploratory  tests  of  Verworn,  Ishikawa  (19 12) 
obtained  reversible  narcotization  of  the  cilia  in  Stentor  coeruleus 
with  chloroform  vapor.  He  brought  a  piece  of  filter  paper  soaked 
in  chloroform  near  the  drop  containing  a  stentor  in  order  to  quiet 
the  animal  for  cutting  operations,  but  by  his  own  account  this  is 
not  to  be  recommended  because  necrotic  conditions  easily  develop. 
At  lowest  concentrations  the  stentors  showed  an  accelerated 
activity,  but  at  higher  strengths  the  cilia  were  slowed  and  the 
animals  became  semi-elongate.  Wounds  from  cutting  were  slow 
in  healing.  With  nearly  lethal  concentration,  the  animals  remained 
quiet  as  if  dead,  though  sometimes  they  could  recover  slowly,  and 
it  was  also  reported  that  they  might  shed  their  cilia  or  begin 
disintegrating,  a  small  portion  at  a  time. 


ANALYSIS    OF    STENTOR  24I 

Hofer  (1890)  recommended  hydrochlorate  of  hydroxylamine 
(0-25%)  neutralized  with  sodium  carbonate  for  slowing  the  cilia 
and  relaxing  myonemes  in  coeruleus.  Of  several  related  compounds 
Mugard  and  Courtney  (1955)  found  that  only  KH2PO4  was  a 
sufficiently  non-toxic  immobilizer  of  all  ciliates  tested,  including 
stentors. 

Methyl  cellulose,  first  introduced  for  quieting  paramecia  by 
Marsland  (1943),  remains  the  least  noxious  method  for  slowing 
cilia  in  stentors.  Its  use  will  be  discussed  in  the  chapter  on 
techniques. 

4.  Anaesthesia  of  myonemes 

Stentors,  like  Spirostomum  and  the  stalked  Vorticellids  are 
capable  of  very  strong  and  instantaneous  contraction.  In  my 
experiments  with  stentors  I  have  been  impressed  by  the  observa- 
tion that  contractility  seems  to  be  one  of  the  last  functions  to 
disappear,  and  even  grossly  abnormal  and  necrotic  specimens,  no 
longer  capable  of  swimming  with  their  cilia  or  of  regenerating, 
nevertheless  continue  to  react  to  poking  with  the  needle  by  rapid 
and  vigorous  contraction,  almost  up  to  the  time  of  their  final 
demise. 

Attempts  to  anaesthetize  the  myonemes  and  abolish  contraction 
have  been  pursued  both  for  the  purpose  of  fixing  and  staining 
animals  in  the  fully  extended  state  and  to  test  whether  stentors 
behave  like  a  typical  nerve-muscle  preparation. 

It  will  be  recalled  that  Neresheimer  (1903)  found  what  he 
thought  to  be  nerve-like  fibers  which  he  called  "  neurophanes  " 
running  to  the  myonemes,  and  later  Dierks  (1926a)  described 
similar  fibers  ("  neuroids  ")  running  exterior  to  the  myonemes  and 
terminating  in  or  sending  branches  to  them.  That  these  fibers  with 
their  putative  function  represent  specialized  organelles  and  not 
mere  artifacts  of  fixation  is  still  very  questionable  (see  p.  55),  yet 
they  led  Neresheimer  to  an  extensive  study  of  the  effects  of  drugs 
on  Stentor  coeruleus  which  may  have  its  merits  apart  from  the 
conclusion  he  drew.  Control  animals  were  first  placed  in  a  small 
dish  on  a  platform  to  which  a  graduated  stick  was  fastened  in  a 
vertical  position  so  that  a  weight  on  a  pulley  could  be  dropped 
from  a  measured  height  onto  the  platform,  the  vibration  of  which 
would  then  stimulate  the  animals  to  contract.   The  minimum 


242  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

distance  of  fall  to  excite  contraction  was  then  used  as  a  basis  for 
comparison  of  the  reaction  of  stentors  subjected  to  various  drugs. 

Morphine  hydrochloride  apparently  produced  the  greatest 
insensitivity.  This  relaxation  was  counteracted  in  a  typical  manner 
by  the  antagonists  atropine  and  picrotoxin.  Strychnine  produced 
mild  contractions,  as  would  be  expected  from  its  effect  on  higher 
animals.  In  curare  the  contraction  was  so  energetic  that  both  clear 
and  pigmented  stripes  were  said  to  be  torn  loose  in  a  way  which 
he  did  not  describe  in  detail.  The  antagonist,  physostigmin, 
counteracted  this  effect.  Neresheimer  states  that  these  results 
confirmed  earlier  studies  by  Verworn  on  Stentor,  Spirostomum^  and 
Carchesium.  If  the  myonemes  are  excitable  only  through  neuroid 
fibers  one  might  have  expected  complete  paralysis  on  the  basis  of 
blockage  of  the  neuro-muscular  junction  which  curare  produces 
in  higher  forms.  Complete  relaxation  of  specimens  which  could 
then  be  fixed  in  the  extended  position  was  achieved  in  Spirostomum 
but  not  in  Stentor.  Caffein  seemed  to  increase  the  sensitivity,  but 
in  nicotine  the  stentors  relaxed  and  became  more  insensitive. 

A  student  of  mine  (N.  G.  Parisis,  1956,  unpubHshed  student 
report),  tested  the  effects  of  curare  and  strychnine,  separate  and 
combined,  on  Stentor  coeruleus  and  Spirostomum  amhiguum.  Both 
drugs  stimulated  mucoid  secretion,  as  demonstrated  by  the  obser- 
vation that  the  animals  could  be  moved  by  an  advancing  needle 
before  the  needle  came  near  the  cell.  In  neither  substance  alone 
was  contractility  lost.  In  a  mixture  of  strychnine  and  curare, 
how  ever,  the  ciliates  lost  their  power  of  contraction  completely  and 
could  even  be  cut  in  two  without  responding,  though  the  cilia 
kept  beating. 

Neresheimer  also  tested  one  bromide  (NaBr)  which  also  made 
stentors  so  insensitive  that  they  could  be  cut  in  two  without  con- 
traction, but  apparently  the  effect  was  not  reversible  and  the 
animals  did  not  survive  the  treatment.  I  have  found  that  1% 
solutions  of  the  iodides  of  sodium  or  potassium  have  the  same 
effect  and  their  action  is  completely  reversible  (Tartar,  1957a). 
Outstretched  animals  could  be  cut  in  two  without  a  single  twitch 
in  either  half,  and  after  returning  to  normal  medium  complete 
contractility  was  recovered  within  a  day. 

Although  they  might  become  very  insensitive,  Neresheimer 
found  that  his  treated  stentors  always  contracted  when  treated  with 


ANALYSIS    OF    STENTOR  243 

common  fixing  agents.  From  this  fact  together  with  the  general 
similarity  between  the  response  of  stentors  and  nerve  preparations 
to  the  drugs  and  antagonists  which  he  tested,  Neresheimer  con- 
cluded that  the  effects  were  not  on  the  myonemes  themselves  but 
on  the  "  neurophanes  "  which  were  therefore  of  a  neuroid 
character.  Dierks  was,  of  course,  of  the  same  opinion  with  regard 
to  his  ''  neuroids  "  and  he  found  that  coeruleus  became  insensitive 
to  touch  in  KCl,  while  CaCL  increased  contraction  and  was 
antagonistic  to  the  action  of  potassium ;  for  animals  made  insensi- 
tive in  the  potassium  salt  regained  their  irritability  when  calcium 
chloride  was  added.  Relaxed  stentors  still  contracted  when  fixed 
with  Flemming's  solution.  But  contraction  of  the  cell  in  strongly 
coagulating  solutions  can  scarcely  be  taken  as  demonstrating  that 
the  myonemes  were  not  directly  affected  and  the  impression 
remains  that  much  more  sophisticated  studies  will  be  needed  to 
demonstrate  similarities  and  differences  between  the  responses  of 
stentors  and  typical  nerve-muscle  preparations. 

Merton  (1932,  1935)  also  attempted  to  treat  stentors  so  that  they 
could  be  fixed  and  stained  in  the  extended  form.  Anticipating 
Dierks,  he  found  that  KCl  gives  a  partial  anaesthesia  of  the 
myonemes.  In  dilute  Ringer's  solution,  stentors  became  out- 
stretched but  their  irritability  was  increased.  Metal  salts  of  iron 
and  copper  were  said  to  produce  differential  contractions  of  the 
cell  and  from  his  description  it  appears  that  the  anterior  end  of  the 
stentor  contracted  while  the  tail-pole  remained  extended.  Copper 
sulphate  produced  a  hardening  of  the  cortex  which  therefore 
antagonized  the  contraction  of  the  myonemes  and  left  stentors  in 
a  semi-extended  state.  Fairly  well  extended  preparations  were 
made  by  relaxing  stentors  for  2  to  3  hours  in  Ringer's  solution 
diluted  1:3,  then  applying  weak  copper  acetate  to  harden  the 
surface,  following  this  treatment  with  fixation. 

Dierks  (1926b)  confirmed  that  a  0-5%  solution  of  KCl  renders 
stentors  insensitive  to  touch.  Conversely,  CaCl2  increased  contrac- 
tion and  was  antagonistic  to  the  action  of  potassium,  animals 
regaining  their  irritability  when  calcium  was  added.  A  0-04% 
solution  of  Na2S04  paralyzed  both  cilia  and  myonemes,  but  stentors 
relaxed  in  this  way  or  with  KCl  still  contracted  on  fixing. 


244  "THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

5.  Comparison  of  osmotic  effects  to  cooling 

Following  the  speculations  of  Jacques  Loeb,  Greeley  (1901) 
tested  whether  increasing  the  osmotic  pressure  of  the  medium 
surrounding  coeruleus  had  the  same  effect  as  decreased  temperature. 
Reducing  the  environmental  temperature  to  2  °C  not  only  quieted 
the  animals  but  produced  a  variety  of  pathological  conditions, 
including  the  disappearance  of  the  feeding  organelles  and  the 
lateral  striations  —  to  mention  two  of  the  most  interesting  effects 
which  deserve  checking.  On  rewarming,  the  ''  rest  of  the  cells  " 
apparently  survived  a  couple  of  weeks  but  in  only  a  few  cases  did 
they  regenerate.  Cane  sugar  was  said  to  give  the  same  effects  as 
cooling,  though  a  typographical  omission  in  the  published  account 
prevents  our  ever  knowing  the  concentration  employed.  As  we 
shall  see  later,  sugar  causes  shedding  of  the  membranellar  band, 
but  disappearance  of  the  lateral  stripes  does  not  occur  and  they 
merely  collapse  with  the  cell.  Full  regeneration  followed  sugar 
treatments;  therefore  we  presume  that  the  treatment  was  mild 
enough  to  allow  the  animals  to  survive.  Loeb's  conjecture  concern- 
ing the  similarity  between  cooling  and  concentration  of  protoplasm 
by  loss  of  water  through  osmosis  was  therefore  considered  to  have 
been  confirmed. 

Increasing  the  temperature  to  25-28  °C  apparently  accelerated 
division,  as  would  be  expected;  yet  we  cannot  give  credence  to 
Greeley's  account  that  within  3  to  4  hours  there  were  many 
successive  divisions  induced  without  marked  decrease  in  size. 

6.  Acceleration  of  division 

In  addition  to  the  strange  account  of  accelerated  division  just 
mentioned,  Peters  (1904)  claimed  that  dilute  solutions  of  KCl  also 
stimulate  fission  in  coeruleus.  The  solution  used  was  o-oi  molar 
or  a  bit  stronger.  NaCl  solutions  of  comparable  strength  produced 
a  suppression  of  division  instead.  From  the  results  it  appears  that 
Peters  probably  did  get  an  accelerated  division.  He  was  looking 
for  a  specific,  immediate  impulse  since  the  experiments  were  run 
for  only  6  hours.  Many  abnormalities  were  also  encountered. 
Apparently  the  peristomal  band  was  shed  in  some  specimens 
(because  regeneration  occurred)  although  he  did  not  say  so 
expHcitly.  Unequal  divisions  and  production  of  small  blebs  of 
cytoplasm  were  reported.  For  a  division  experiment  Peter's  proce- 


ANALYSIS    OF    STENTOR  245 

dure  was  odd,  as  he  did  not  count  the  smaller  individuals !  But  if 
anything  this  should  mask  the  strength  of  the  results  produced, 
and  hence  we  are  merely  left  with  the  suggestion  that  possibly  KCl 
may  supply  an  impulse  to  division.  The  effect,  if  valid,  was 
apparently  not  due  to  osmotic  pressure,  because  lactose  solutions 
of  even  higher  osmotic  tension  were  without  effect. 

7.  Changes  in  state  of  the  protoplasm 

An  incidental  observation  of  Prowazek  (19 13)  was  that  sodium 
taurocholicum  causes  the  endoplasm  of  stentors  to  clump  into 
balls  and  the  nucleus,  at  first  highly  refractive  then  disappears. 

Changes  in  the  internal  viscosity  of  stentors  in  relation  to  various 
ions  was  studied  by  Heilbrunn  (1928).  Centrifuging  the  animals 
in  various  salt  solutions  he  observed  the  relative  speed  with  which 
internal  granules  and  particles  passed  through  the  endoplasm. 
Bivalent  cations  (calcium  and  magnesium)  apparently  decreased 
the  viscosity  of  the  interior,  producing  liquefaction.  Monovalent 
ions  (K,  Na,  NH4,  Li)  increased  the  viscosity  and  caused  coagula- 
tion. But  later  Heilbrunn  (1943)  admitted  that  calcium,  on  rapid 
entrance  into  the  cell,  could  produce  gellation  instead  of  liquefac- 
tion. Precisely  what  was  happening  in  these  experiments  is 
therefore  not  clear. 

Heilbrunn  also  studied  in  coeruleus  and  in  Arbacia  eggs  what  he 
called  the  surface  precipitation  reaction,  or  the  formation  of  films 
over  crushed  cells  which  prevents  their  explosive  dissolution. 
Calcium  appears  to  be  necessary  for  this  reaction,  presumably  a 
type  of  coagulation,  for  no  film  formation  occurred  when  the 
calcium  was  removed  with  ammonium  oxalate.  (Schmitt,  as  quoted 
by  Moore  (1945)  states  that  calcium  has  more  affinity  for  water 
than  protein  polar  groups  and  therefore  desolvates  these  groups 
which  then  join  with  others  to  produce  a  more  solid  state.) 
Magnesium  could  not  replace  calcium  in  this  reaction  but  strontium 
could.  That  cells  do  not  supply  their  own  calcium  for  this  reaction 
he  explained  by  conceiving  that  intracellular  calcium  is  bound 
and  not  free. 

Noting  the  difficulties  of  studying  eflFects  on  the  endoplasm  by 
simple  immersion  of  a  cell.  Chambers  and  Kao  (1952)  micro- 
injected  solutions  into  the  interior.  Among  other  subjects  was  a 
*'  large  variety  "  oi  Stentor,  quite  possibly  Wrw/^w^.  They  injected 


246  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

CaCl2  and  SrCL  in  the  concentrations  used  by  Heilbrunn  and 
found  that  there  was  an  endoplasmic  clotting  at  the  site  of  injection, 
hence  agreeing  with  his  addendum  and  general  thesis  that  calcium 
has  a  clotting  effect.  It  was  especially  interesting  to  me  that  the 
clot  was  moved  to  the  surface  and  pinched  off,  as  also  in  amoebas. 
Even  when  as  much  as  two-thirds  of  the  interior  had  been  coagu- 
lated the  clot  was  still  ejected  and  the  cortex  apparently  not 
violated. 

Swimming  of  stentors  was  normal  in  solutions  of  CaCL  and 
SrCL,  but  if  the  ectoplasm  was  torn,  the  wound  opened  and  there 
was  a  clotting  of  the  exposed  endoplasm,  much  as  in  Heilbrunn's 
surface  precipitation  reaction.  Conversely,  in  NaCl  and  KCl  tears 
were  never  repaired,  the  endoplasm  flowing  out  of  the  cut  without 
any  sign  of  coagulation.  The  responses  of  Stentor  protoplasm  were 
therefore  quite  like  those  previously  found  by  the  senior  author  in 
Amoeba  dubia. 

Chambers  and  Kao  also  injected  phenol-red  and  bromcresol- 
purple  into  their  unnamed  Stentor  and  found  that  the  cytoplasm 
had  a  pH  of  6-8  while  that  of  the  macronucleus  was  at  least  7-6. 
Correspondingly,  Strom  (1926),  using  very  dilute  mixtures  of 
phosphates  to  obtain  a  varying  pH  without  specific  ionic  effects, 
found  that  stentors  are  only  slightly  influenced  by  changes  of  pH 
from  6-5  to  8-0. 

8.  Tests  for  an  antero-posterior  metabolic  gradient 

In  pursuing  his  theory  of  metabolic  gradients  in  organisms. 
Child  (19 14)  subjected  coeriileiis  to  a  respiratory  depressant,  KCN. 
The  animals  were  promptly  disintegrated,  starting  from  the  frontal 
field  and  membranellar  band  and  extending  posteriorly  over  the 
lateral  ectoplasm.  In  a  few  cases  there  was  a  secondary  wave  of 
disintegration  beginning  at  the  posterior  end.  The  species  poly- 
morphus  gave  a  similar  response,  though  difficult  to  follow  because 
of  the  unpigmented  cortex.  A  number  of  other  ciliates  also  showed 
graded  disintegration  of  the  cell.  It  was  concluded  that  there  is  an 
antero-posterior  gradient  and  that  this  is  metabolic  in  character. 

On  another  species  ("  probably  roeselW)  Child  (1949)  used  a 
more  subtle  approach  in  studying  the  intracellular  reoxidation  of 
reduced  Janus  green  and  methylene  blue.  Oxidation  changes  the 
green  dye  to  red.  This  color  change  passed  in  a  wave  from  the 


ANALYSIS    OF    STENTOR  247 

anterior  to  the  posterior  pole  followed  by  a  wave  of  ectoplasmic 
disintegration  in  the  same  direction.  The  membranellar  band, 
especially  at  the  level  of  the  basal  bodies,  showed  the  sharpest 
effect  and  therefore  seemed  to  be  a  site  of  vigorous  oxidation. 
Methylene  blue  gave  essentially  the  same  results  and  Child  felt 
confirmed  in  his  demonstration  of  a  metabolic  gradient  in  Stentor, 

Confirmation  also  seemed  to  be  evident  in  the  work  of  Monod 
(1933)  who  studied  the  differential  susceptibility  of  different  parts 
of  the  cell  in  Stentor  and  other  common  ciliates  to  ultraviolet 
radiation.  Again  there  was  an  antero-posterior  gradient  in  disinte- 
gration of  the  ectoplasm. 

Although  Weisz  ( 1 948d)  confirmed  Child  in  regard  to  the  gradient 
response  of  stentors  to  KCN  and  KMn04,  he  stood  strongly 
against  Child's  interpretation.  This  was  largely  because  he  had 
found  (Weisz,  1948a,  c)  that,  other  factors  being  the  same,  the  rate 
of  oral  regeneration  and  subsequent  growth  of  fragments  was 
independent  of  the  level  of  the  body  from  which  they  were  taken, 
though  of  course  the  shape  of  Stentor  does  not  admit  of  much 
variation  in  this  regard. 

Holding  that  primordium  formation  and  rate  of  growth  are  more 
indicative  of  metaboUc  state  than  is  cellular  disintegration,  Weisz 
denied  the  whole  concept  of  metabolic  gradients  as  applying  to 
Stentor  and  also  questioned  its  applicability  to  other  forms.  He 
gave  a  new  twist  to  these  experiments  by  studying  the  disintegra- 
tion of  fragments  of  stentors  in  KCN.  Anterior  pieces  disintegrated 
from  the  anterior  end  the  same  as  whole  animals.  Posterior  frag- 
ments began  disintegrating  not  at  their  anterior  ends  but  at  the 
holdfast.  And  middle  pieces  started  disintegrating  first  in  the 
region  of  the  contractile  vacuole.  Hence  he  viewed  the  Stentor  cell 
as  a  heirarchy  of  structures  which  vary  in  their  susceptibility  to 
external  agents,  and  this  is  a  function  not  of  any  cellular  gradient 
but  of  the  organization  of  those  structures,  although  it  is  stretching 
the  point  to  say  that  the  contractile  vacuole  is  more  highly  organized 
than  the  lateral  ectoplasm  of  middle  fragments. 

In  answering  Weisz,  Child  (1949)  seems  to  be  saying  that 
Stentor  is  not  a  good  form  for  studying  this  problem  an^^vay 
because  it  does  not  have  the  long  and  cylindrical  shape  of  worms 
and  hydroids.  But  we  shall  shortly  describe  that  there  are  a  great 
variety  of  simple  salts  and  other  substances,  not  directly  related  to 

R 


248  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

respiration  or  metabolism,  which  produce  shedding  of  the  mem- 
branellar  band  in  Stentor  followed  by  a  wave  of  disintegration 
passing  over  the  ectoplasm  towards  the  posterior  pole.  I  am 
therefore  inclined  to  agree  with  Weisz  that  the  localized  disintegra- 
tive action  of  various  solutions  is  a  function  of  the  special  state  of 
organization  of  the  different  parts  of  the  cell  cortex. 

9.  Acquired  tolerance  to  external  agents 

Pre-treatment  of  organisms  with  sub-lethal  concentrations  of 
killing  agents  generally  increases  subsequent  tolerance  of  originally 
lethal  concentrations  of  the  same  substances !  This  adaptation  has 
also  been  demonstrated  in  Stentor.  Davenport  and  Neal  (1896) 
succinctly  summarized  their  studies  on  coeruleus.  ''Stentors  reared 
for  two  days  in  a  culture  solution  containing  0-00005%  mercuric 
chloride  resist  a  killing  solution  of  o -001%  HgCl2  nearly  four  times 
as  long  as  those  reared  in  water.  Similar  results  were  obtained  by 
use  of  quinine.  "  This  was  not  due  to  the  selection  of  resistant 
individuals  but  a  genuine  acclimatization,  because  no  deaths 
occurred  at  the  lower  concentration  and  the  same  individuals  were 
carried  into  the  higher.  Nor  was  this  a  general  adaptation  to 
increased  osmotic  pressure ;  for  the  concentrations  used  were  very 
low,  and  NaCl  solutions  of  the  same  osmotic  pressure  gave  no 
increased  tolerance  to  the  killing  agents.  The  increased  immunity 
was  acquired  rapidly,  measurable  resistance  developing  after  i  or 
2  hours  exposure  to  the  sub-lethal  concentrations,  gradually 
increasing  thereafter  until  exposure  of  longer  than  96  hours  gave 
no  further  resistance.  The  stronger  the  acclimatizing  solution  the 
greater  the  resistance  developed  until  the  strength  was  such  that 
the  lethal  effects  were  additive.  Killing,  by  disintegration  of  the 
cortex  of  the  cell,  occurred  about  three  times  more  rapidly  at  23° 
than  at  15  °C,  indicating  that  death  was  caused  by  a  chemical 
reaction. 

Similar  effects  were  studied  in  the  response  of  coeruleus  to 
alcohols  and  glycerine  by  Daniel  (1909).  Animals  lived  well  for 
weeks  in  1%  ethanol,  were  destroyed  by  6  hours  in  2%,  and  died 
in  2  hours  at  3%.  At  lethal  concentrations  the  body  cilia  soon 
stopped  beating  but  the  membranelles  remained  active  up  to  the 
time  of  death.  Two  different  stocks  showed  notable  differences  in 
regard  to  acquired  tolerance.   In  the  first  stock,   1%  solutions 


ANALYSIS    OF    STENTOR  249 

Stimulated  the  animal  to  great  activity,  accelerated  division  with 
production  of  many  smaller  cells,  and  gave  no  acquired  immunity 
to  higher  concentrations.  The  resistance  of  this  stock  w^as  already 
high  but  Daniel  showed  that  this  did  not  obscure  a  fundamental 
lack  of  acclimatization. 

In  the  second  stock,  animals  in  i  %  ethanol  were  also  excited  to 
increased  activity  but  showed  practically  no  increase  in  rate  of 
division,  and  they  acquired  a  marked  immunity  as  a  result  of 
remaining  in  this  weaker  solution.  For  example,  in  6%  solutions 
they  died  in  162  seconds  if  not  acclimated  but  lived  for  301  seconds 
if  pre-treated  for  4  days  in  1%  ethanol. 

If  acclimated,  6%  ethanol  made  the  membranelles  beat  so 
vigorously  that  the  whole  cell  shook.  The  acquired  tolerance  was 
a  function  of  the  strength  of  the  acclimating  solution  and  the  length 
of  time  the  animals  were  exposed  to  it,  appreciable  immunity  being 
obtained  by  4  hours ;  with  no  further  increases  after  4  days  exposure 
to  sub-lethal  concentrations. 

All  stentors  were  killed  in  8%  ethanol.  The  membranellar  band 
and  frontal  field  were  the  last  parts  to  become  quiet  and  begin 
disintegration.  Acquired  tolerance  for  ethanol  was  not  transferable 
and  gave  no  increased  immunity  to  methanol. 

In  I  to  I /4th  molar  glycerine,  pigment  was  not  shed  as  in  the 
alcohols.  Stentors  remained  motionless  and  then  suddenly  con- 
tracted, whereupon  the  membranellar  band  was  shed  as  a  ribbon. 
If  rescued  from  the  solution,  survivors  could  then  regenerate  a 
new  set  of  feeding  organelles.  Otherwise  the  animals  plasmolyzed, 
beginning  at  the  posterior  end.  Ethanol  immunity  was  not  trans- 
ferable to  glycerine  and  indeed  only  made  the  animals  more 
sensitive  to  the  latter.  Hence  in  general  Daniel  regarded  his 
findings  as  demonstrating  Ehrlich's  principle  that  immunity  is 
specific  and  non-transferable. 

Daniel  also  found,  as  had  Peters  (1904),  that  stentors  are  not 
tolerant  to  excess  alkali  or  acid,  and  this  has  also  been  my 
experience.  Even  very  dilute  solutions  of  hydrochloric  acid  pro- 
duced rapid  killing  after  the  membranelles  stopped  beating  and 
pigment  was  shed.  Apparently  sodium  hydroxide  does  not  pene- 
trate the  cell  so  rapidly,  and  stentors  could  live  for  a  remarkably 
long  time  if  the  pellicle  was  not  ruptured.  The  alkali  caused  a  loss 
of  membranelles  as  in  glycerine  and  the  shed  pigment  became  a 


250  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

"  beautiful  sea-green  ".  Body  cilia  beat  as  long  as  the  ectoplasmic 
structure  remained  intact. 

10.  Shedding  of  pigment  and  pellicle 

The  pigment  of  stentors  is  largely  located  in  ectoplasmic 
granules  beneath  the  pellicle  where  it  is  often  readily  affected  by 
external  agents.  The  species  which  has  been  studied  is  coeruleus, 
observation  of  which  indicates  that  pigment  sloughing  may  even 
occur  under  natural  conditions,  as  was  first  suggested  by  Schuberg 

(1890). 

Loss  of  pigment  occurs  under  three  guises.  A  homogeneous 
blue-green  halo  may  be  ejected,  suggesting  that  the  pigment 
granules  have  been  burst  and  their  contents  set  free.  The  granules 
may  be  cast  off^  as  such  and  appear  as  tiny  particles,  which  seems 
to  be  the  case  in  natural  sloughing.  And  finally,  one  or  more  layers 
of  the  pellicle  may  also  be  shed,  and  in  this  case  the  outer  surface 
carries  the  granules  with  it  where  they  remain  in  rows  corresponding 
to  the  pigmented  stripes.  It  is  surprising  that  the  pellicle  can  be 
sloughed  without  apparently  interfering  in  any  way  with  the  cilia, 
for  the  outer  coating  of  the  cilium  is  in  all  ciliates  continuous  with 
the  pellicle  covering  of  the  cell  body.  This  also  occurs  even  more 
clearly  in  Blepharisma  treated  with  strychnine  in  which  the 
animals  swim  out  of  the  discarded  pellicle  (Nadler,  1929).  As 
already  suggested,  pellicular  shedding  may  have  been  elaborated 
as  a  method  of  case-making,  both  in  certain  species  of  Stentor  and 
in  FoUiculina.  In  the  latter,  Andrews  (1923)  found  that  the  form- 
ing sac  at  first  shows  lines  of  pigment  granules  corresponding  to 
stripes  on  the  body.  An  appearance  very  much  like  this  can  be 
induced  in  coeruleus  which  forms  no  lorica. 

In  methylene  blue,  Neresheimer  (1903)  produced  a  separation 
of  the  stentor  ectoplasm,  and  it  was  in  this  way  that  he  obtained 
the  pieces  which  he  stained  to  demonstrate  "  neurophanes  ". 
Much  later  Weisz  (1950a)  obtained  sloughing  of  pigment  and 
peUicle  in  Janus  green. 

Prowazek  (1904)  found  that  brief  immersion  of  coeruleus  in  \% 
NaCl  caused  a  shedding  of  pigment  as  a  homogeneous  blue  halo. 
The  coloration  was  then  regenerated  in  about  a  day  after  returning 
to  normal  medium.  In  the  same  year,  Peters  (1904)  independently 
made  the  same  observation  and  carried  the  study  much  further. 


ANALYSIS    OF    STENTOR 


251 


He  found  that  pigment  shedding  was  the  immediate  response  of 
stentors  transferred  to  certain  solutions  and  that  animals  could 
even  later  divide  in  media  which  caused  shedding.  The  colored 
slough  he  described  as  of  gelatinous  consistency,  a  homogeneous 
halo  without  granules.  Such  sloughing  was  produced  in  KCl, 
NaCl,  KNO3,  Na2S04,  (NH4)2S04,  Na2HP04,  NaOH,  HCl, 
lactose,  and  chloroform  but  no  shedding  occurred  in  CaCl2, 
Ca(0H)2,  CaS04,  or  MgS04.  Hence  monovalent  cations  which 
are  the  ones  producing  reversal  of  ciliary  beating  also  elicit  the 
sloughing  response,  but  bivalent  cations  do  not.  The  effect  is 
obviously  not  osmotic  since  lactose  and  chloroform  gave  a  similar 
result  and  CaCU  protected  the  animals  against  the  shedding  effects 
of  Na2S04,  although  the  osmotic  pressure  was  correspondingly 
increased.  In  chloroform  and  Na2S04  some  layers  of  the  pellicle 
apparently  were  also  shed  as  a  "  heavy  coat  ".  Peters  suggested 
that  the  pigment  is  a  protein  which  is  dissolved  by  certain  salts. 

We  have  just  noted  that  Daniel  (1909)  obtained  shedding  of 
pigment  in  alcohols  and  NaOH  but  not  in  glycerine. 

Peters'  study  was  confirmed  and  extended  in  some  of  my  own 
investigations  (Tartar,  1957a).  I  also  found  that  monovalent 
cations  produced  pigment  shedding,  while  calcium  and  magnesium 
salts  did  not.  The  most  vigorous  shedding  occurred  in  NaHCOa, 
NH4CI,  and  LiCl.  In  strychnine  there  was  a  violent  shattering 


\^      N 


Fig.  70. 

A.  Shedding  of  pellicular  layer  and  some  pigment  granules 

in  <S.  coeruleus  in  i  %  ammonium  chloride. 

B.  Casting  off  the  membranellar  band  in  2%  urea,  a:  Band 
shed  following  fimbriation  of  membranelles,  with  last  part  to  go 
being  the  gullet  lining,  b:  Neat  removal  of  peristome  in  proper 
treatment,  with  lateral  and  frontal  stripe  structures  remaining 
unaffected,  c:  Extended  treatment  produces  two  fronts  of 
disintegration,  but  if  stopped  (d)  middle  piece  separates,  survives, 

and  regenerates.    (After  Tartar,  1957a.) 


252  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

loose  of  the  granules  and  the  pellicle  was  shed  in  pieces,  not  as  a 
hull,  as  in  the  amazing  demonstration  with  Blepharisma  by  Nadler. 
Shedding  of  the  pellicle  was  especially  noticeable  and  clear-cut  in 
NH4CI,  ammonium  acetate,  LiCl,  and  egg  albumen  (Fig.  70A). 
Stentors  apparently  regenerate  both  pigment  and  pellicle  when 
returned  promptly  to  culture  medium,  for  their  later  appearance 
was  altogether  normal.  The  concentrations  employed  were  usually 
1%,  made  up  in  the  filtered  lake  water  used  for  culturing.  Attempts 
by  repeated  treatment  with  salts  to  obtain  stentors  which  were 
completely  devoid  of  surface  pigment  granules  and  could  not 
recover  them  later  were  not  successful.  Granules  located  in  the 
endoplasm  (Weisz,  1949a)  may  have  been  mobilized  (and 
multiplied)  to  take  their  place. 

These  shedding  responses  might  therefore  be  useful  in  tracing 
the  origin  of  the  pigment  granules  during  their  rapid  regenera- 
tion, as  well  as  in  testing  the  consequences  for  respiration  of  greatly 
reducing  the  number  of  cortical  granules.  And  treatments  causing 
a  neat  shedding  of  the  pellicle  should  provide  a  means  of  studying 
the  significance  of  this  layer  in  permeability  as  well  as  in 
immunological  reactions. 

II.  Shedding  of  the  membranellar  band 

In  addition  to  producing  extrusion  of  pigment,  Prowazek's 
(1904)  ^%  solution  of  table  salt  caused  the  shedding  of  the  mem- 
branellar band  in  coerideus;  Daniel  (1909)  obtained  such  cast-offs 
with  glycerine.  These  reports  were  generally  neglected  until, 
independently,  I  found  the  same  effect  when  stentors  were  sub- 
jected to  25%  sea  water  (Tartar,  1957a).  I  then  tested  several 
chlorides,  sulfates,  acetates,  sugars,  urea,  and  albumen  —  usually 
in  1%  solution.  All  produced  sloughing  of  the  membranellar  band 
with  one  exception.  This  was  ethanol  in  which,  as  in  the  studies  of 
Daniel,  the  membranelles  remained  completely  intact  and  beating 
as  the  last  part  of  the  cell  to  disintegrate.  In  all  treatments  which 
produced  sloughing,  the  animals  could  later  recover  and  regenerate 
the  feeding  organelles,  with  the  single  exception  of  NiS04  treat- 
ment. The  typical  response  was  for  the  stentors  to  swim  about  in 
agitation,  backwards  in  the  monovalent  cations,  then  suddenly 
contracting  as  if  the  agents  had  succeeded  in  penetrating  deeply. 
Following  this  contraction,  the  membranelles  became  fimbriated 


ANALYSIS    OF    STENTOR  253 

and  usually  the  major  portion  of  the  band  was  cast  off,  including 
both  membranelles  and  a  basement  ribbon  (Fig.  70B).  This  effect 
was  all  or  none ;  for  although  only  part  of  the  band  might  be  shed, 
there  was  no  case  in  which  the  band  was  simply  injured  while 
remaining  in  place.  When  the  animals  were  left  in  these  solutions, 
the  wave  of  disintegration  of  the  ectoplasm  passed  over  the  frontal 
field  and  proceeded  posteriorly  down  the  lateral  surfaces,  often 
being  met  by  a  corresponding  wave  originating  in  the  holdfast  and 
moving  forward  (b).  Hence  the  appearance  was  just  like  that  of  the 
disintegration  in  KCN  demonstrated  by  Child  (1914).  Again, 
there  was  an  all  or  none  effect,  the  ectoplasm  becoming  totally 
disintegrated  or  remaining  intact  with  cilia  beating.  Even  after 
half  the  ectoplasm  was  destroyed,  disintegration  stopped  at  once 
on  return  to  normal  medium  and  the  remaining  part  could  still 
survive  and  recover.  The  disintegrated  ectoplasm  as  well  as  the 
underlying  endoplasm  was  then  pinched  off  to  leave  a  viable 
mid-fragment  (b). 

It  seems  odd  that  the  membranelles,  with  their  deep-lying  basal 
plates,  should  have  been  the  first  to  go,  but  this  was  clearly  the  case. 
In  fact,  urea  and  sucrose  treatments  gave  very  neat  shedding  of 
the  membranellar  band  if  treatment  was  stopped  promptly, 
without  the  frontal  field  or  lateral  ectoplasm  being  affected  in  any 
way.  Sea  water  and  most  of  the  other  treatments  caused  a  lifting 
of  the  band  first  at  its  distal  end.  Specimens  were  often  obtained 
in  which  the  mouthparts  remained  intact,  complete  with  their 
membranelles;  but  in  Holtfreter's  solution  the  membranelles  fining 
the  gullet  and  bordering  the  oral  pouch  were  usually  the  first  to  go. 
Therefore  it  is  possible  by  choosing  the  proper  treatment  to 
produce  specimens  in  which  the  mouthparts  alone  are  complete, 
and  others  in  which  only  these  parts  have  been  subjected  to  dele- 
tions. This  technique  is  also  convenient  for  producing  large 
numbers  of  animals  in  simultaneous  regeneration  (p.  353),  or  for 
inducing  primordium  formation  in  graft  complexes  without  the 
need  for  cutting  operations  which  might  disturb  a  contrived 
arrangement  of  the  lateral  striping. 

Oral  primordia  were  also  shed  in  salts,  urea,  and  sugars.  The 
more  advanced  its  development,  the  more  likely  was  the  primor- 
dium to  be  shed.  Sloughing  usually  began  at  the  anterior  end  and 
proceeded  posteriorly.  At  early  stages,  on  the  contrary,  in  which 


254  ^^^    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

oral  cilia  had  not  yet  grown  out  to  their  definitive  length,  the  anlage 
was  notably  resistant  and  resembled  in  this  regard  the  general 
ectoplasm  from  which  it  presumably  arises.  Stage  4  is  the  time 
when  the  primordium  becomes  susceptible  to  sloughing.  It  may 
be  inferred  that  development  involves  the  elaboration  of  a  certain 
type  of  organization  which  is  peculiarly  sensitive  to  these  external 
agents. 

We  do  not  know  how  this  shedding  of  the  membranellar  band 
is  brought  about  but  we  can  at  least  exclude  some  possibilities. 
Osmotic  pressure  probably  plays  no  part  because  even  very  weak 
solutions  of  Na2C03  produce  sloughing,  and  sugars  do  likewise 
even  long  before  the  cell  begins  to  collapse.  The  action  is  not  ionic 
because  it  is  shown  by  neutral  substances  like  sugars.  There  seems 
to  be  no  relation  to  valency,  for  both  NaCl  and  CaCl2  produce 
like  results.  Hydrogen  ion  effects  are  ruled  out  by  the  efficacy  of 
neutral  substances.  Nor  does  the  result  appear  to  be  due  to  injury 
as  such,  since  the  most  drastic  operations  with  a  glass  needle  do 
not  produce  it.  The  great  variety  of  substances  producing  the 
effect  itself  poses  a  difficulty  to  analysis. 

12.  Morphogenetic  effects 

After  encountering  such  striking  and  specific  effects  on  the 
stentor  cell  of  relatively  simple  compounds  in  lethal  concentrations, 
I  prepared  sub-lethal  solutions  which  obviously  affected  the  animals 
but  allowed  their  indefinite  survival  (Tartar,  1957a).  When  stentors 
which  had  shed  their  membranellar  band  in  sucrose  were  not 
washed  before  replacing  in  normal  medium  regeneration  was 
delayed  from  i  to  2  days,  doubtless  because  of  the  carry-over  of 
some  of  the  sugar.  Otherwise  the  animals  were  entirely  normal  in 
their  behavior.  Hence  sugar  is  in  itself  an  effective  inhibitor  of 
primordium  formation. 

Diluted  sea  water  also  gave  reversible  inhibition  of  oral  regenera- 
tion. Often  there  were  graded  effects,  depending  upon  the  con- 
centration in  the  solution  and  the  susceptibility  of  the  individual. 
Sometimes  regeneration  was  merely  delayed.  In  other  individuals 
or  at  different  concentrations  there  was  formation  of  a  complete 
membranellar  band  but  with  inadequate  development  of  the 
mouthparts,  only  a  small  pit  being  produced.  A  further  influence 
was  shown  when  the  anlage  was  arrested  in  mid-development  at 


ANALYSIS    OF    STENTOR  255 

Stage  4  and  remained  as  such.  All  these  effects  are  quite  like  those 
obtained  with  acriflavin  by  Weisz  (1955).  Dilute  sea  water  also 
produced  cases  of  aborted  fission  without  separation  of  the  daughter 
cells,  as  well  as  ectoplasmic  lesions  which  produced  a  sort  of 
self-mincing  in  which  the  ectoplasmic  striping  was  broken  up  into 
irregular  patches  (Fig.  71  a). 


Fig.  71. 

A.  Effects  of  sub-lethal  dilutions  of  sea  water  on  S.  coeruleus. 
a:  Reversible  inhibition  (or  delay)  of  regeneration,  b:  Arrest 
of  primordium  development  at  stage  4.  c:  Incomplete  stomato- 
genesis.    d:  Incomplete  division,    e:  Astomatous  regeneration 

and  breaking  of  stripe  pattern  into  disorganized  patches. 

B.  Reactions  to  sub-lethal  concentrations  of  lithium  chloride 
include  the  above,  as  well  as  (a)  a  more  exaggerated  self-mincing 
of  the  stripe  pattern  with  corresponding  abnormality  of  cell- 
shape,  (b)  stacking  up  of  oral  sets  due  to  resorption  failure  in 
repeated  reorganizations,  and  (c)  extraordinary  increase  in 
breadth  of  the  cell  from  hypertrophy  of  striping,  leading  to 
spontaneous   formation   of  self-reproducing   doublets.     (After 

Tartar,  1957a.) 


Lithium  chloride  in  concentrations  of  o-i  to  0-005%  g^^^ 
reversible  effects  which  were  especially  interesting  (Fig.  71B). 
Again,  primordium  formation  could  be  reversibly  inhibited  for 


256  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

I  to  4  days,  with  complete  regeneration  occurring  on  return  to 
normal  medium.  Regeneration  was  sometimes  merely  delayed, 
astomatous,  or  blocked  in  development  at  stage  4,  which  is  just 
the  stage  at  which  the  primordium  becomes  susceptible  to  shedding. 
Abortive  fissions  were  noted,  as  well  as  distortions  of  body 
striping.  In  successive  reorganizations,  LiCl  prevented  the  resorp- 
tion of  the  old  organelles,  with  the  result  that  there  was  a  stacking- 
up  of  several  sets  of  feeding  organelles,  as  shown.  Perhaps  most 
provocative  of  all  was  that  the  stentors  became  very  broad,  as 
if  multiplication  of  lateral  striping  had  been  stimulated  much 
beyond  the  normal  bounds,  and  in  fact  some  of  these  animals 
spontaneously  converted  into  doublets,  as  illustrated. 

The  only  previous  test  of  the  eifect  of  LiCl  on  ciliates  to  my 
knowledge  was  that  of  Faure-Fremiet  (with  J.  Ducornet,  1949) 
who  found  that  this  agent  produced  microstomatous  forms  in 
Tetrahymena.  This  he  attributed  to  inhibition  of  the  multiplication 
of  cilia,  yet  it  appears  that,  in  Stentor,  broadening  of  the  cell  is 
accompanied  by  increase  of  kinetics  and  therefore  considerable 
multiplication  of  cilia  and  related  structures. 

It  is  well  known  that  lithium  has  special  eifects  on  developing 
eggs,  producing  in  general  a  vegetalization  or  depressing  a  gradient 
whose  maximum  is  at  the  animal  pole  (see  Gustafson,  1954).  The 
precise  nature  of  this  effect  is  not  known.  It  may  be  that  lithium 
alters  the  hydration  of  proteins,  for  it  seems  to  produce  a  coarse- 
ness of  the  cytoplasm  in  general  and  to  cause  proteins  to  become 
fibrillar,  coagulated,  and  stable.  Raven  (1949)  states  that  lithium 
seems  to  affect  especially  the  density  of  the  cortical  cytoplasm  in 
the  eggs  of  Limncea.  Since  the  major  morphogenetic  events  in 
stentors  are  also  located  in  the  cortex  of  the  cell,  the  effects  may 
be  comparable  and  one  might  even  regard  suppression  of  differen- 
tiation of  the  feeding  organelles  and  concomitant  broadening  of 
the  lateral  ectoplasm  as  a  parallel  of  *'  vegetalization  ".At  any  rate 
it  is  most  interesting  that  lithium  has  unique  effects  upon  Stentor, 
as  it  does  upon  embryos. 

13.  Inhibition  of  growth  by  X-ray,  and  other  effects 

Kimball  (1958)  subjected  coeruleus  to  X-rays  and  found  that 
when  irradiated  animals  were  returned  to  culture  medium  fission 
was  much  delayed.  Although  the  stentors  fed  and  formed  food 


ANALYSIS    OF    STENTOR  257 

vacuoles  they  grew  slowly  or  even  decreased  in  size.  But  they 
could  form  primordia  in  reorganizations  apparently  induced  by 
the  irradiation,  or  in  regenerations  following  transection.  The 
nuclei  were  likewise  apparently  unaffected.  At  least  some  digestion 
evidently  occurred,  because  starvation  controls  decreased  in  size 
much  more  rapidly  than  the  irradiated  stentors.  Therefore, 
Kimball  concluded  that  X-rays  inhibit  growth  by  decreasing  or 
blocking  the  net  synthesis  from  feeding,  though  not  preventing 
such  synthesis  as  occurs  in  the  building  of  primordia.  Delayed 
fission  would  hence  be  due  to  the  animal's  failing  to  attain  fission 
size  or  only  slowly  achieving  the  maximum  volume,  and  not  to 
incapacity  to  form  primordia  or  undergo  the  nuclear  changes 
which  accompany  division. 

These  effects  were  independent  of  the  presence  or  absence  of 
oxygen  during  irradiation.  But  anoxia  combined  with  X-ray 
(irradiation  in  an  atmosphere  of  nitrogen)  resulted  in  deformities 
such  as  ridges,  flanges,  in-pocketings,  and  extra  tails  and  sets  of 
feeding  organelles.  It  seems  likely  that  these  abnormalities  resulted 
from  breaks  in  the  ectoplasm  followed  by  improper  healing;  for 
the  forms  described  resemble  those  obtained  by  disarranging  the 
ectoplasmic  pattern  mechanically  so  that  disjunctive  areas  no 
longer  coordinate  (see  Figs.  65B  and  66e).  If  so,  it  may  be  suggested 
that  in  these  operations  the  separated  areas  join  but  fail  to  achieve 
intimate  union  because  of  misorientation,  while  in  the  radiation 
studies  the  orientation  is  at  first  correct,  but  intimate  rejoining, 
say,  of  the  fibrous  structures  of  the  clear  stripes,  is  inhibited  as  an 
after-effect  of  irradiation.  This  in  itself  would  be  an  interesting 
effect,  though  still  leaving  the  question  why  outgrowth  and 
joinings  of  fibers,  which  undoubtedly  occurs  during  oral 
primordium  development,  is  not  also  inhibited. 

14.  Effect  of  temperature  on  size 

A  statistical  sudy  of  variation  in  dimensions  with  temperature 
(Zingher  and  Fisikow%  1931)  showed  that  mean  size  of  stentors 
increases  with  rising  temperatures  up  to  a  certain  limit.  Natural 
collections  accordingly  showed  a  similar  enlargement,  and  also  an 
increased  coefficient  of  variation,  from  winter  to  summer.  Since 
the  measurement  curves  were  unimodal,  apparently  only  one  race 
of  coeruleus  occurred  in  the  pond  sampled.  Nor  was  illumination  a 


258  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

factor,  because  animals  cultured  in  light  and  in  darkness  did  not 
differ  in  measurements. 

All  these  studies  attest  the  accessibility  of  stentors,  as  free-living 
cells,  to  the  action  of  external  agents,  and,  by  the  often  precise 
selectivity  of  the  animal's  reaction,  their  suitability  for  the  pursuit 
of  problems  in  cell  physiology. 


CHAPTER    XV 

METABOLISM 

I.  Effects  of  starvation 

Apart  from  eventual  death,  the  most  conspicuous  response  of 
protozoa  to  suspension  of  feeding  is  an  often  marked  decrease  in 
size  of  the  individual.  That  is  to  say,  the  animal  consumes  some  of 
its  own  substance  before  dying.  Protozoa  differ  in  the  extent  of 
reduction  w^hich  is  possible.  Paramecia  decrease  little  before  they 
shrivel  and  die,  but  Dileptus  (Visscher,  1923)  and  Amoeba 
(Hartmann,  1928)  can  persist  and  dwindle  to  i/iooth,  and 
Didinium  (Mast,  1909)  to  i/6th  their  original  volume.  Bursaria 
truncatella  can  diminish  in  length  from  500  to  90 /x  as  the  feeding 
organelles  become  proportionately  smaller  (Lund,  19 17),  and 
Dembowska  (1938)  showed  that  under  starvation  Stylonychia 
repeatedly  reorganizes  on  a  smaller  scale  until  very  tiny  animals 
are  produced.  When  great  latitude  in  size  is  permitted,  the  protozoa 
do  not  simply  become  thin  and  emaciated  like  starving  vertebrates ; 
as  with  many  invertebrates,  including  hydras  and  flat  worms,  they 
become  proportionately  reduced  in  most  of  their  parts  so  that  they 
may  properly  be  called  dwarfs.  Minute  forms  are  not  only  the 
result  of  individuals  consuming  their  own  substance  but  may 
possibly  also  involve  so-called  "  hunger  divisions  ",  or  an  initial 
persistence  of  the  rhythm  of  fission  in  spite  of  decreasing  size 
during  the  first  days  of  starvation.  The  two  factors  are  not  easily 
separable  when  dealing  with  large  samples  difficult  to  count.  Yet 
Maupas  (1888)  confirmed  Gruber  (1886)  in  reporting  that  large, 
well-fed  coeruleus,  when  isolated,  continued  dividing  3  or  4  times, 
producing  smaller  than  normal  individuals.  Division  without 
attaining  maximum  size  was  indicated,  though  on  Maupas' 
evidence  the  stentors  must  not  have  been  totally  without  food 
since  division  products  much  larger  than  one-eighth,  say,  of  the 
maximum  volume  were  produced.  In  my  experience,  on  the 
contrary,  even  large  stentors  very  seldom  divide  after  they  are 

259 


26o  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

isolated  into  a  large  drop  of  coarse-filtered  medium  on  a  depression 
slide.  The  reality  of  hunger  divisions  in  stentors  therefore  remains 
still  in  question. 

Many  have  observed  that  in  the  largest  stentors,  coeruleiis  and 
polymorphus,  dwarf  forms  appear  under  conditions  of  starvation 
(Maupas,  1888;  Johnson,  1893;  Popoflr,  1909;  Prowazek,  1904 
and  Schulze,  1951).  Stolte  (1922)  observed  both  large  and  small 
forms  in  starving  cultures.  I  have  myself  frequently  noted  a  similar 
range  in  size  which  is  not  always  correlated  with  cannibalism. 
Possibly  the  larger  forms  are  animals  which  had  recently  divided, 
do  not  then  divide  further  after  food  is  withheld,  and  therefore 
would  gradually  diminish  only  through  the  utilization  of  their  own 
substance.  To  complete  this  historical  resume  Sosnowsky  (1899), 
as  reported  by  Sokoloff  (1923),  stated  that  division  in  stentor  is 
stimulated  by  starvation,  and  that  the  macronuclear  membrane 
disappears  under  these  conditions.  Ivanic  (1927)  contributed  the 
equally  improbable  notion  that,  when  feeding  is  stopped,  stentors 
and  other  protozoa  actually  increase  in  size  as  they  use  up  the 
remaining  food  but  fail  to  divide. 

Several  visible  changes  besides  decrease  in  cell  volume  occur 
during  starvation.  In  coeruleus  and  perhaps  in  other  pigmented 
stentors  the  coloration  tends  to  disappear.  This  fading  to  nearly 
white  is  conspicuous  in  single  animals  long  isolated  on  slides,  but 
larger  samples  in  a  culture  dish  remain  fairly  green  for  a  month  or 
more  though  starved.  Weisz  (1949a)  thought  that  the  pigment 
granules  are  digested  during  starvation.  Granular  bands  do  seem 
eventually  to  disappear  in  isolated  animals,  but  only  as  death 
approaches.  But  stentorin  itself  is  certainly  not  easily  assimilated 
in  cannibals  and  the  pigment  may  even  be  ejected  as  waste. 
Pigment  changes  are  therefore  enigmatic  and  require  much  more 
study.  Stolte  (1922)  emphasized  that  starvation  produces  vacuoli- 
zation of  the  endoplasm  but  this  pathological  state,  again,  is 
prominent  only  near  the  point  of  death.  An  important  alteration 
which  occurs  only  gradually  is  that  the  macronucleus  becomes 
reduced.  On  the  evidence  it  cannot  be  decided  whether  this  is 
because  the  substance  of  the  nucleus  is  drawn  upon  to  maintain 
life  or  because  the  nucleus  is  adapting  in  size  to  the  decreasing 
volume  of  cytoplasm,  or  both.  That  regulation  of  nuclear  to 
cytoplasmic  volume  is  more  important  than  consuming  the  nucleus 


METABOLISM  261 

as  a  reserve  is  indicated  by  the  often  poor  survival  of  hypernucleated 
stentors  (p.  304). 

It  was  Johnson  (1893)  who  first  noted  that  dwarf  stentors  have 
smaller  and  fewer  macronuclear  nodes  than  well-fed  animals  at 
any  stage,  and  Prowazek  (1904)  provided  further  confirmatory 
observations.  AUescher  (19 12)  made  a  separate  study  of  this 
phenomenon.  First  she  found,  naturally,  that  decrease  in  size  of 
starving  stentors  was  greatest  at  higher  temperatures,  at  which 
metabolism  would  be  expected  to  proceed  at  a  higher  pace;  but 
rate  of  decrease  also  then  fell  oflF  rapidly,  as  if  definite  limits  to 
reduction  in  size  were  met.  Cool  and  warm  cultured  animals 
eventually  shrunk  to  the  same  small  size.  Apparently  the  nucleus 
decreased  but  little  at  lower  temperatures,  while  in  warm  cultures 
under  starvation  decrease  in  the  size  and  especially  in  the  number  of 
macronuclear  nodes  was  conspicuous:  of  the  order  of  from  20  to  5. 
In  this  reduction  some  of  the  nodes  decreased  in  stainabiHty  as 
their  substance  was  apparently  transferred  to  adjacent  beads  of 
the  nucleus.  The  reduction  was  therefore  especially  one  of  surface 
area.  Her  interpretation  was  that  the  nucleus  as  well  as  the 
cytoplasm  was  consumed  during  starvation  and  that  this  is  possible 
in  ciliates  with  widely  dispersed  macronuclei,  such  as  Stentor  and 
Dileptus,  but  not  in  forms  with  compact  nuclei,  like  Paramecium. 
I  have  found,  indeed,  that  P.  caudattim  forced  to  carry  two 
macronuclei  do  eventually  resorb  one  entirely,  instead  of  diminish- 
ing both  (Tartar,  1940).  Perhaps  it  might  with  equal  plausibility 
have  been  suggested  that  paramecia  cannot  decrease  the  nuclear 
surface  further,  while  stentors  with  their  nodulated  nucleus  can 
and  do,  in  adaptation  to  decreasing  size. 

In  a  clone  of  coeruleus  I  made  some  observations  on  starvation 
dwarfs  simply  by  isolating  abundant  samples  in  caster  dishes  and 
allowing  them  to  stand  for  a  month  without  added  nutrients.  The 
size  of  the  ciliates  decreased  from  a  maximum  diameter  of  376 /x 
to  a  minimum  value  of  94 /z.  After  two  weeks  of  starvation  the 
nuclear  picture  was  varied,  for  the  number  of  nodes  ranged  from 
6  to  16  and  large  and  small  nodes  were  frequently  found  within 
the  same  individual.  This  indicates  that  the  nucleus  was  still  in 
process  of  adapting  to  decreasing  size  of  the  animals.  Eventually 
the  dwarfs  contained  only  5  or  6  nodes  which  were  still  large  in 
proportion  to  the  volume  of  the  cell  yet  smaller  than  those  of 


262 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


normal  animals  (Fig.  72).  The  dwarfs  had  tiny,  proportionate 
feeding  organelles  and  the  number  of  lateral  stripes  was  about 
half  the  normal,  indicating  the  morphological  adaptation  to  decrease 
in  size.  Johnson  had  found  that  such  dwarfs  undergo  no  irrever- 
sible changes  and  are  capable  of  complete  recovery,  growing  and 
dividing  when  later  fed.  I  demonstrated  that  fragments  of  these 
tiny  stentors  were  capable  of  normal  oral  regeneration. 


Fig.  72.  Largest  S.  coeruleus  compared  to  smallest  individual 
in  starvation  culture.  The  larger  had  a  contracted  diameter  of 
376 ju.,  18  macronuclear  nodes,  and  c.  no  pigment  stripes.  The 
smaller :  94  /x,  5  nodes,  and  c.  56  stripes.  Note  that  membranelles, 
colored  stripes,  and  nodes  are  not  proportionately  smaller  in  the 
tiny  stentor. 


As  expected,  the  fat  and  carbohydrate  reserves  (further  discussed 
in  the  following  section)  are  exhausted  during  periods  of  starvation 
(Zhinkin,  1930).  According  to  Weisz  (1949a)  their  utiHzation  is  so 
rapid  that  the  endoplasm  is  cleared  of  these  reserves  within  a  day. 
My  impression  is  that  at  least  the  carbohydrate  stores,  which  are 
clearly  visible  as  white  granules  in  dark-field  illumination  are 
exhausted  much  more  slowly.  Moreover,  when  survival  of  anterior 
halves  with  little  if  any  such  reserves  was  compared  with  that  of 
posterior  halves  bearing  abundant  reserves  no  conspicuous 
advantage  from  the  stored  material  could  be  demonstrated.  This 
may  have  been  due  to  the  abnormal  conditions  apparently  involved 
in  isolating  animals  into  small  drops  on  slides,  for  some  specimens 


METABOLISM  263 

even  died  before  the  carbohydrate  stores  were  exhausted  (Tartar, 
1959a). 

All  these  findings  merely  confirm  that  stentors,  like  other 
organisms,  are  able  to  continue  living  for  some  time  by  consuming 
nutrient  reserves  or  their  own  vital  substance  during  periods  of 
starvation.  More  precise  studies  of  starving  cells  might  dissociate 
factors  most  dependent  for  their  maintenance  on  continuous  inflow 
of  new  materials,  or  starving  protozoa  may  prove  particularly 
sensitive  and  discriminatory  in  their  response  to  specific  additives 
such  as  certain  amino  acids,  in  contrast  to  well-fed  cells.  At  present, 
one  is  above  all  impressed  by  the  adaptive  morphological  changes 
whereby  starving  ciliates  become  not  merely  shrunken  but  re- 
formed on  a  smaller  scale,  as  tiny  but  perfectly  formed  dwarfs  are 
produced. 

2.  Storage  and  utilization  of  nutrient  reserves 

Visible  reserves  in  Stentor  take  the  form  of  glycogenoid  granules 
and  fat  droplets.  The  first  can  be  demonstrated  by  dark-field 
illumination  or  Lugol's  iodine  stain  and  the  second  by  Sudan  III. 
These  reserves  were  the  subject  of  an  extensive  field  and  laboratory 
study  of  Zhinkin  (1930)  on  polymorphus,  with  incidental  observa- 
tions on  coeruleiis. 

Carbohydrate  reserves  are  present  in  the  form  of  granules  which 
are  concentrated  toward  the  posterior  pole.  Clearly  revealed  by 
Tyndall  eflFect  using  side  illumination  against  a  dark  background, 
one  can  observe  the  precise  location  of  these  granules  in  living 
coeruleus  (Tartar,  1959a).  In  animals  which  have  been  cleared  of 
food  vacuoles  by  withholding  food  organisms,  these  reserves  are 
seen  to  occupy  a  subcortical  band,  forward  from  the  posterior  pole 
and  discontinuous  in  the  oral  meridian  (Fig.  73).  This  is  the 
regular  and  preferred  location,  though  overstepped  if  the  carbo- 
hydrates are  especially  abundant.  Soluble  in  hot  water  and  staining 
red  with  iodine,  Zhinkin  identified  the  granules  as  glycogen. 
Weisz  thought  them  suflftciently  diflFerent  to  merit  the  name 
paraglycogen.  Fat  stores  are  present  in  the  form  of  tiny  droplets 
throughout  the  endoplasm. 

Zhinkin  followed  stentors  through  an  annual  cycle.  The  most 
conspicuous  changes  were  that,  with  decreasing  temperature  in  the 
autumn,  the  carbohydrate  reserves  increased;  but  when  the  ponds 

s 


264  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

were  covered  with  ice  and  developed  an  oxygen  deficiency  these 
reserves  disappeared  as  the  abundance  of  fat  droplets  increased. 
This  alternation  of  reserve  stuffs  suggested  correlations  with 
temperature  and  oxygen  tension,  as  well  as  the  possibility  that  the 
carbohydrate  was  converted  into  fats.  Zingher  (1933)  in  fact 
maintained  that  both  starches  and  proteins  are  convertible  into 
fats  by  ciliates. 


Fig. 73.    Nutritional  reserves  in  S.  coeruleus. 

A.  Photo    showing    location    of   glycogenoid    carbohydrate 

granules  (cf.  Fig.  17A). 

B.  Random  distribution  of  fat  droplets  revealed  by  Sudan  III 

staining.    (After  Zingher,  1933.) 


In  laboratory  tests,  Zhinkin  found  maximum  increase  in  number 
and  size  of  glycogenoid  granules  at  3-5  °C,  while  the  primary  con- 
dition for  fat  accumulation  was  lack  of  oxygen.  In  general  it  appears 
from  his  data  that,  naturally,  an  accumulation  of  nutrient  reserves 
requires  a  temperature  which  is  not  so  low  that  metabolism  is 
sharply  curtailed  nor  so  high  that  increased  activity  in  cell  multipli- 
cation utilizes  the  food  directly  and  may  even  draw  upon  reserves 
already  present.  Weisz  found  that  fat  stores  were  not  used  in 
regeneration,  and  Zingher  considered  them  necessary  to  a  normal 
condition  of  the  cytoplasm.  My  impression  from  long  observation 
of  stentors  in  culture  is  that  well-fed  animals  always  have  abundant 


METABOLISM  265 

carbyhodrate  reserves  and  probably  fat  stores  as  well.  Only  with 
considerable  trouble  could  coeruleus  be  divested  of  its  glycogenoid 
granules  (Tartar,  1959a).  The  seasonal  cycle  which  Zhinkin  seems 
to  have  well  documented  may  therefore  be  the  consequence  of  a 
delicate  and  changing  equilibrium  between  rates  of  feeding  and 
cell  growth. 

3.  Respiration 

The  oxygen  requirements  of  Stentor  have  been  little  studied. 
Stolte  (1922)  remarked  that  decreased  oxygen  produced  vacuoliza- 
tion of  the  endoplasm.  In  a  Russian  ecological  study  which  I 
have  not  seen,  Zhinkin  and  Obraztsov  (1930)  observed  that 
polymorphus  and  coeruleus  are  found  in  ponds  only  where  there  is 
abundant  oxygen :  under  ice,  only  where  bottom  springs  provided 
enough  of  the  dissolved  gas.  Sampling  of  an  Iowa  pond  showed 
stentors  to  be  abundant  only  near  the  bottom  under  nearly 
anaerobic  conditions  according  to  Sprugel  (1951),  a  result  most 
paradoxical  since  the  same  animals  lived  well  when  transferred  to 
jars  in  the  laboratory.  Oxidation-reduction  studied  by  means  of 
color  indicators  in  protozoa,  presumably  including  Stentor,  was 
pursued  by  Roskin  and  Semenov  (1933)  in  a  study  which  was 
not  available  to  me.  It  has  been  observed  (Whiteley,  personal 
communication)  that  in  some  races  oi  coeruleus  the  animals  remained 
near  the  bottom  while  in  other  clones  they  always  collected  near 
the  surface,  suggesting  that  there  may  be  racial  differences  in 
oxygen  requirement. 

Using  the  Cartesian  diver  technique,  Whiteley  (1956)  discovered 
a  marked  and  unique  increase  in  respiratory  rate  in  halves  of 
starved  coeruleus  containing  all  the  macronucleus  and  hence  having 
abnormally  high  ratios  of  nucleus  to  cytoplasm.  During  the  first 
day  the  rate  of  respiration  showed  increases  of  as  much  as  175%. 
This  acceleration  was  correlated  solely  with  the  nucleo-cytoplasmic 
ratio  and  was  repeated  after  a  second  removal  of  cytoplasm. 
Appropriate  controls  demonstrated  that  neither  cutting  nor 
regeneration  were  responsible  for  the  increase.  Enucleates  showed 
a  low  and  gradually  decreasing  rate  of  respiration ;  that  of  whole 
animals,  high  and  also  only  decreasing.  In  the  critical  macro- 
nucleate  halves  the  accelerated  respiration  temporarily  approached 
the  values  shown  by  whole  cells.  The  whole  macronucleus  there- 


266  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

fore  tends  to  form  the  respiratory  system  of  a  whole,  even  in  a 
diminished  amount  of  cytoplasm. 

Yet  it  is  interesting  that  when  de  Terra  (1959)  forced  all  the 
macronucleus  into  one  daughter  cell  during  division  and  so  pro- 
duced coeruleus  with  twice  the  normal  macronuclear  complement, 
the  uptake  and  incorporation  of  radiophosphorus  was  not  different 
from  that  of  normal  cells. 

As  relating  to  energy  metabolism,  sites  of  acid  phosphatase  in 
coeruleus  were  determined  by  Weisz  (1949b).  Positive  tests  were 
obtained  around  macronuclear  nodes  and  other  bodies  in  the 
endoplasm  as  well  as  at  the  basal  granules  of  membranelles  and 
body  cilia.  Enzyme  activity  decreased  during  starvation  but  not 
during  periods  of  morphogenesis,  and  appeared  in  oral  primordia 
only  after  cilia  were  present  and  active.  Therefore,  acid  phosphatase 
is  probably  involved  in  the  action  but  not  in  the  development  of 
ciHa. 

4.  Digestion 

In  Folliculina  and  Stentor  the  transit  of  the  food  vacuoles  is  not 
in  a  definite  track  provided  by  cyclosis  of  the  endoplasm,  as  in 
Paramecium,  but  each  is  individually  handled,  according  to 
Andrews  (1955).  Schwartz  (1935)  described  the  normal  digestion 
of  Colpidium  by  coeruleus,  which  required  about  20  hours  and 
included  dissolution  of  the  nucleus  of  the  prey.  In  feeding 
enucleates,  however,  the  food  vacuoles  from  the  start  contained 
excess  fluid  and  at  no  time  was  digestion  normal  or  complete.  It 
will  also  be  recalled  that  Schwartz  found  indication  that  even  a 
substantial  reduction  in  number  of  macronuclear  nodes  resulted 
in  abnormal  metabolism  with  inadequate  digestion. 

Meissner  (1888)  reported  that  stentors  (apparently  ^ofymorpAw^) 
take  up  and  digest  starch  grains.  This  was  confirmed  by  Zingher 
(1933)  who  also  noted  increased  fat  droplets  following  the  starch 
meal,  suggesting  that  carbohydrates  are  converted  into  fats;  yet 
coeruleus  predominantly  rejected  starch  grains  in  the  feeding 
studies  of  Schaeffer  (see  p.  11).  Contrary  to  Meissner,  Zingher 
found  that  coeruleus  ingests  the  fat  droplets  of  milk,  which  he 
thought  were  assimilated  directly  because  rapid  cell  multiplication 
followed.  In  rich  cultures  with  little  oxygen,  digestion  was  inhibited 
and    stentors    became    stuffed   with   undigested    food   vacuoles. 


METABOLISM  267 

according  to  Stolte  (1922),  a  condition  which  could  be  corrected 
by  supplying  oxygen  through  algae  added  to  the  medium.  His 
interpretation  was  that  oxygen  is  necessary  for  the  elaboration 
and  activity  of  digestive  enzymes. 

5.  Symbiosis  with  green  algae 

As  in  many  other  ciliates  and  in  simpler  metazoa,  certain  stentors 
may  bear  spheroid,  grass-green  cells  of  Chlorella  living  within 
them.  These  species  include  polymorphtis,  igneiis  (Balbiani,  1893), 
amethystinuSy  and  niger  (Maier,  1903).  The  algae  reside  in  the 
endoplasm  (Johnson,  1893),  where  they  are  scattered  at  random. 
That  the  relationship  is  symbiotic  is  shown  by  the  demonstrations 
that  the  stentors  in  question  can  live  without  the  algae,  that  the 
algae  do  not  disintegrate  on  death  of  the  stentor  (Balbiani,  1893) 
and  may  even  continue  life  as  free-living  cells,  and  that  both 
stentors  and  algae  receive  advantages  from  their  association. 

The  first  experiments  on  symbiosis  in  Stentor  were  made  by 
Prowazek  (1904).  He  reported  that  chlorellae  can  multiply  within 
dead  and  crushed  polymorphus,  indicating  that  the  algae  in  stentors 
can  probably  be  grown  in  ''  tissue  culture  "  like  those  of  Para- 
mecium bursaria  (Loefer,  1936).  Having  obtained  artificial  sym- 
biosis by  infecting  Stylonychia  and  Euplotes  with  free-living 
Chlorella,  Prowazek  tried  unsuccessfully  to  obtain  the  same  with 
Stentor  coeruleus.  Failure  occurred  in  spite  of  the  fact  that  the 
coeruleus  digested  the  chlorellae  only  partially  and  ejected  the 
remainder.  Even  the  enucleated  stentors  would  not  accept  chlorellae 
intimately  into  their  cytoplasm,  ingesting  the  algae  but  retaining 
them,  undigested,  within  food  vacuoles.  Prowazek  concluded  that 
the  cytoplasm  of  coeruleus  is  unfavorable  for  Chlorella  and  he  there- 
fore doubted  Kessler's  (1882)  report  that  symbiosis  can  be 
established  between  this  Stentor  and  the  chlorellae  from  a  fresh- 
water sponge.  Certain  experiments  of  mine  were  confirmatory 
(Tartar,  1953).  In  interspecific  grafts  (a  convenient  method  for 
introducing  symbionts)  any  substantial  admixture  of  coeruleus 
cytoplasm  with  polymorphus  resulted  in  the  ejection  of  symbionts 
natural  to  the  latter  species.  In  Prowazek's  observations  neither 
enucleated  polymorphus  nor  enucleated  coeruleus  with  ingested 
chlorellae  survived  longer  than  controls  without  algae. 

The  most  comprehensive  study  of  symbiosis  in  polymorphus  has 


268  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

been  that  of  Hammerling  (1946)  and  Schulze  (1951)  who  began 
their  work  together  but  published  separately.  Their  findings  will 
be  reviewed  together,  noting  points  of  difference  in  interpretation 
or  observation.  In  the  cultures  of  polymorphus,  the  stentors 
collected  appropriately  at  the  lighted  sides  of  aquaria,  yet  too 
intense  an  illumination  was  detrimental.  Hammerling  remarked 
that  the  stentors  divided  only  at  night  or  in  the  dark.  This  observa- 
tion may  be  important  in  providing  a  means  for  obtaining 
simultaneous  fission  of  animals  in  well-fed  cultures. 

Stentors  were  not  easily  divested  of  their  symbionts.  When 
grown  in  the  dark,  chlorellae  decreased  greatly  in  abundance  but 
a  few  algae  were  always  retained,  mostly  toward  the  posterior  pole. 
Persisting  symbionts  in  these  pale  ciliates  might  therefore  have 
been  removed  by  cutting  and  culturing  a  number  of  anterior 
fragments.  Instead,  the  method  employed  by  Pringsheim  (I.e.)  for 
Paramecium  hursaria  was  used:  pale  stentors  previously  grown  in 
the  dark  were  cultured  with  abundant  food  (free-living  algae)  at 
high  temperature  of  3o°C.  Under  these  conditions  for  rapid 
division,  some  stentors  would  outpace  the  chlorellae  and  emerge 
entirely  white.  Three  classes  of  animals  from  the  same  stock  could 
therefore  be  compared :  green  forms  with  abundant  chlorellae,  pale 
stentors  grown  in  the  dark  but  always  retaining  some  algae,  and 
white  animals  completely  devoid  of  symbionts. 

The  presence  of  actively  metabolizing  chlorellae  promoted  the 
survival  of  starving  stentors.  This  was  demonstrated  by  "  feeding  " 
the  symbionts  while  starving  their  hosts.  Light  and  the  mineral 
nutrients  in  soil  extract  or  Benecke's  solution  provided  conditions 
for  metabolism  and  growth  of  the  chlorellae,  as  proved  by  the  fact 
that  symbionts  did  increase  and  pale  animals  became  green  when 
only  these  factors  were  supplied.  Conditions  for  starvation  of  the 
stentors  were  established  by  withholding  the  free-living  algae  which 
they  had  been  eating  and  digesting,  and  by  repeated  transfers  to 
remove  bacteria.  Controls  were  afforded  by  comparing  white  with 
green  stentors  and  survival  in  darkness  as  well  as  in  the  light. 

When  kept  in  the  light,  green  stentors  survived  twice  as  long 
as  white  animals  without  symbionts,  and  pale  stentors  with  few 
but  increasing  chlorellae  were  in  between.  The  capacity  of  the 
stentors  to  undergo  occasional  fissions  following  starvation  was  in 
the  same  order,  green  ones  dividing  the  most.  In  the  dark  these 


METABOLISM  269 

differences  disappeared  and  maximum  survival  times  were  the 
same.  Hence  photosynthesizing  chlorellae  did  confer  an  advantage 
in  survival  of  their  starving  hosts.  Schulze  further  noted,  hov^ever, 
that  in  the  dark  the  first  individual  to  die  was  always  a  white  one, 
for  minimal  survival  times  were  in  the  order :  white,  pale  and  green. 
This  result  seems  enigmatic  since  one  would  expect  the  catabolism 
of  stentor  and  symbiont  to  be  additive.  But  according  to 
Hammerling,  stentors  receive  some  advantage  from  their 
symbionts  even  in  the  dark. 

What  is  the  nature  of  the  aid  to  survival  provided  by  Chlorella  ? 
First,  this  succor  was  not  complete,  because  stentors  with  thriving 
chlorellae  did  eventually  die.  Therefore  the  ciHates  did  not  become 
autotrophic,  or  capable  of  living  indefinitely  through  their 
symbionts  on  light  and  mineral  nutrients  alone,  as  is  possible  in 
the  more  complete  symbiosis  found  in  Paramecium  hursaria 
(Pringsheim,  1928).  Schulze  showed  this  deficiency  to  be  the  same 
in  igneiis  as  in  polymorphus.  At  first  Hammerling  said  that  starving 
stentors  simply  digest  their  symbionts,  so  that  animals  with 
abundant  chlorellae  should  live  longer  on  these  food  reserves ;  but 
he  later  softened  this  conclusion.  And  Schulze  found  that  the 
hosts  only  partially  and  never  completely  digest  their  symbionts. 
Moreover,  any  minor  aid  from  partial  digestion  should  be  com- 
pensated by  multiplication  of  the  chlorellae  at  the  expense  of  their 
hosts.  Digestion  of  the  algae  was  therefore  probably  not  the  basis 
of  longer  survival.  Hammerling  observed  that  pale  animals  with 
very  few  chlorellae  nevertheless  lived  much  longer  in  the  dark  than 
white  animals,  though  of  course  not  as  long  as  green  ones,  indicat- 
ing that  the  algae  wxre  supplying  some  minor  factor  important  to 
survival.  The  possibility  that  polymorphus  has  lost  the  capacity  for 
the  synthesis  of  one  or  more  vitamins  was  suggested  by  Schulze's 
finding  that  his  white  stentors  could  not  live  indefinitely  unless 
fed  on  green,  free-living  algae.  This  species  of  Stentor  may 
therefore  have  become  dependent  on  plants  for  certain  vitamins. 

As  stated  by  Hammerling  the  general  conclusion  from  the  tests 
was  that  the  presence  of  chlorellae  enables  stentors  better  to  endure 
a  period  of  starvation.  That  such  is  the  only  advantage  conferred 
by  the  symbionts  was  further  indicated  by  studies  of  the  division 
rate  of  well-fed  stentors.  He  found  that  the  fission  rate  was  only 
slightly  higher  if  chlorellae  were  present  and  Schulze  said  that  the 


270 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


multiplication  rate  was,  if  anything,  slower.  Evidently  the  sym- 
biosis is  of  no  particular  advantage  to  stentors  under  optimal 
conditions.  In  any  event,  rapid  division  led  to  decrease  in 
symbionts  as  the  host  outpaced  the  chlorellae. 

Interesting  experiments  on  the  artificial  development  of  sym- 
biosis and  exchange  of  chlorellae  were  also  performed.  Animals 
without  symbionts  were  put  in  an  appropriate  culture  medium  to 
which  was  added  a  brei  of  crushed  cells  containing  chlorellae. 
White  ciliates  would  then  ingest  the  liberated  symbionts,  which 


X    ^^  aatoirophjj 

hecame  colorless  laier 


^,  e/idurJn^  Sy/nbiosxs  ; 

autoirvphic 


lahile  or  defeciive  Symbiosis 


jD^yJT 


Tjor/nally  \  / 


-X  no  saiisfacwri/ 
symbiosis 


■Makeup  wihhdy^cdLty ^  hat  yoocL 
Symbiosis 

•samajbui  Chlorella  £rom  igneus 
^  rendered  capable  o£ 


y  /       \  °  o*  /       Sipnbiosis 


Symbiosis 


Fig.  74.    Exchange  of  Chlorellae  and  establishment  of  artificial 
symbiosis  between  Stentor  polymorphus,  S.  igneus,  and  Para- 
mecium bursaria,  diagramming  data  of  Schulze,  1951.    Letters 
correspond  to  descriptive  paragraphs  in  text,  p.  271, 


METABOLISM  271 

were  first  encapsulated  in  food  vacuoles  but  not  digested  and  later 
freed  into  the  endoplasm.  By  this  means  normal  symbiosis  could 
be  reestablished  in  either  Stentor  polymorphus  or  Paramecium 
bursaria  provided  with  their  own  type  of  chlorellae.  The  procedure 
itself  was  therefore  adequate. 

Exchanges  of  symbionts  made  by  Schulze,  in  part  confirmed  by 
Hammerling,  are  diagrammed  in  Fig.  74  and  may  be  summarized 
in  the  following  propositions: 

(a)  Colorless  P.  bursaria  readily  acquired  Chlorella  from 
S.  polymorphus  but  did  not  become  autotrophic  as  with  their  own 
chlorellae.  Enduring  symbiosis  was  not  established,  for  the  ciliates 
later  became  white.  This  was  confirmed  by  Hammerling. 

(b)  In  contrast,  the  paramecia  established  a  true  symbiosis  and 
became  capable  of  autotrophic  nutrition  when  chlorellae  of  -S".  igneus 
were  substituted  for  their  own. 

(c)  However,  if  chlorellae  from  a  stock  of  igneus  had  previously 
resided  for  7  months  in  polymorphus^  they  then  gave  no  satisfactory 
symbiosis  when  introduced  into  white  P.  bursaria.  The  host  can 
therefore  alter  the  symbiont,  and  in  this  case  the  pyrenoid  of  the 
igneus  chlorellae  was  lost. 

(d)  As  the  preceding  implies,  colorless  polymorphus  could 
establish  an  enduring  symbiosis  with  chlorellae  from  igneus,  in 
spite  of  the  fact  that  the  algae  were  not  readily  taken  up  and  the 
hosts  remained  paler  than  polymorphus  with  their  own  chlorellae. 
Using  certain  stocks  of  both  species  of  Stentor,  chlorellae  from  the 
igneus  were  said  to  be  rendered  capable  of  free-living  existence 
after  passage  through  the  polymorphus,  again  indicating  an  eflrect 
of  host  on  partner. 

(e)  These  independent  algae  could  then  quickly  establish  a  good 
symbiosis  when  taken  up  by  colorless  polymorphus. 

(f)  But  when  normally  free-living  Chlorella  were  offered  to  white 
polymorphus  no  symbiosis  developed. 

(g)  Colorless  polymorphus  estabUshed  with  chlorellae  from 
P.  bursaria  what  Schulze  called  a  labile  partnership.  Only  with 
difficulty  was  a  symbiosis  estabhshed,  and  this  relationship  per- 
sisted only  if  bright  light  and  soil  extract  were  provided,  but 
Hammerling  succeeded  in  maintaining  a  green  culture  for  one  year. 
Notable  was  the  fact  that  the  chlorellae  did  not  render  the  stentors 
autotrophic  as  they  do  the  paramecium. 


272  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

From  these  experiments  it  is  clear  that  symbiosis  with  chlorellae 
is  a  precise  relationship  involving  a  delicate  equilibrium  between 
specific  host  and  specific  symbiont.  Morphological  differences 
noted  by  Schulze  certainly  indicate  that  the  chlorellae  normally 
found  in  polymorphus,  igneus,  and  P.  bursaria  are  distinct  types. 
Successful  symbiosis  was  not  related  to  the  readiness  with  which 
the  ciliates  took  up  chlorellae,  for  in  some  cases  colorless  animals 
rapidly  became  green  but  not  symbiotic,  and  vice  versa.  A  first 
requirement  is  that  the  chlorellae  be  not  digested,  though  taken  into 
food  vacuoles,  and  later  infiltrated  intimately  into  the  cytoplasm. 
It  is  not  known  how  digestion  is  prevented,  since  the  hosts  seemed 
to  be  able  partially  to  digest  symbionts  when  starved,  and  they 
could  also  fully  digest  free-living  chlorellae.  The  second  require- 
ment is  that  a  harmonious  equilibrium  be  established  between 
multiplication  of  host  and  symbiont  such  that  the  one  does  not 
outpace  the  other  in  reproduction. 

According  to  Hammerling  (1946),  Ohler  (1922)  and  Pringsheim 
(1928)  have  found  that  P.  bursaria  can  take  up  different  types  of 
algae,  but  free-living  forms  are  not  capable  of  substituting  for  the 
natural  symbionts.  Apparently  this  is  also  the  case  with  S.  poly- 
morphus,  for  I  have  found  animals  containing  both  Chlorella  and 


Fig.  75.  Facultative  multiple  symbiosis,  a :  Stentor  polymorphus 
with  both  Chlorella  and  a  needle-like  algae  free  in  endoplasm. 
The  needle  forms  were  same  as  those  growing  in  the  culture. 
b:  On  isolating  onto  slides,  the  needle  algae  were  shed  — 
apparently  alive  —  but  not  the  Chlorella. 


METABOLISM  273 

bundles  of  a  needle-shaped  alga  intimately  within  the  endoplasm ; 
but  on  isolation  the  latter  were  always  eventually  ejected  (Fig.  75). 
The  transient  residents  were  apparently  picked  up  from  those 
free-living  in  the  culture  jar. 

6.  Parasites  of  stentor 

A  natural  transition  leads  from  symbionts  to  parasites,  though 
their  effects  on  the  metabolism  of  stentors  have  not  been  explored. 
For  the  following  account  I  have  relied  in  part  upon  Kirby's 
(1941a,  b)  excellent  reviews. 

Unidentified  undulating  filaments  occurring  in  bundles  within 
vacuoles  in  the  cytoplasm  of  stentors  were  observed  by  Miiller 
(1856)  and  his  students,  two  of  whom  considered  these  inhabitants 
probably  parasitic  (Claparede  and  Lachmann,  1857).  Balbiani 
(1893)  observed  S.  polymorphus  with  bloated  nuclei  in  which  the 
macronucleus  was  parasitized  and  largely  disintegrated  by 
''Holospora".  The  host  was  otherwise  normal  but  its  ultimate 
fate  was  not  determined.  Sphcerophrya  stentoris  Maupas  is  an 
unstalked  suctorian  which  is  both  free-living  and  parasitic  on 
species  of  Stentor.  In  its  parasitic  phase  this  organism  lives  in  the 
cytoplasm  and  is  without  tentacles  or  cilia.  Kalmus  (1928)  reported 
it  in  S.  roeseli.  Hetherington  (1932b)  reported  a  cytoplasmic 
invasion  by  bacilli  in  S.  coeruleiis.  The  infection  caused  the  animals 
to  become  pale,  but  they  could  be  ''cured"  by  repeated  transfers 
to  fresh  medium. 

In  S.  coeruleiis  and  Spirostomum  ambiguum^  Rowland  (1928) 
found  an  euglenoid  with  metabolic  movements  which  appeared 
commensal  or  endoparasitic.  This  she  identified  as  Astasia  captive 
Beauchamp.  The  intruder  restricted  itself  to  the  subpellicular 
cortex.  It  was  previously  reported  as  an  endoparasite  in  a  rhabdo- 
coele  in  France.  Recently  an  apparently  diflterent  species  of  Astasia 
has  been  described  as  a  facultative  parasite  in  S.  coeruleus  by 
Schonfeld  (1959).  When  well-fed  stentors  were  presented  with  this 
organism,  grown  separately  in  cultures,  the  stentors  ate  few  and 
digested  those  without  ill  effects.  Starved  animals  gorged  themselves 
on  the  astasias,  which  were  not  digested  but  were  liberated  from 
the  food  vacuoles  and  wandered  about  in  the  endoplasm.  The 
stentors  eventually  degenerated  and  died,  a  preceding  vacuoliza- 
tion possibly  resulting  from  enlargement  of  the  emptied  food 


274  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

vacuoles.  Filtered  Astasia  culture  fluid  also  killed  the  stentors  when 
transferred  into  it. 

Somewhat  resembling  Schonfeld's  account,  a  student  (William 
I^ewis,  1959)  has  recently  observed  that  coeruleus  may  ingest  and 
form  food  vacuoles  of  the  flagellate  Rhabdomonas  incurva  but  the 
prey  passes  through  the  stentors,  emerging  by  defecation  in  a 
living  and  active  state.  This  could  be  the  beginning  of  parasitism, 
since  at  least  many  of  the  flagellates  enter  the  stentor  but  are 
protected  against  digestion. 

We  may  choose  this  place  to  mention  a  report  that  stentors  are 
possibly  toxic  to  other  organisms.  Otterstrom  and  Larsen  (1946) 
very  doubtfully  attributed  kills  of  fingerling  fish  in  hatchery  ponds 
to  wild  (but  not  to  cultured)  Stentor  polymorphus  producing  toxins 
only  when  irritated. 

7.  Abnormal  stentors 

Here  we  shall  describe  certain  abnormalities  in  coeruleus  relating 
to  the  pigment  granules  which  sometimes  arise  without  operational 
interference  in  cultures  or  stentor  samples.  Whether  these  aberrant 
forms  are  due  primarily  to  disturbance  of  metabolism  or  involve 
other  factors  and  even  racial  differences  as  well  we  do  not  know. 
Very  little  is  yet  known  about  the  abnormal  animals  themselves 
or  their  origin,  but  they  offer  promising  Unes  for  further  study. 

(a)  Depigmented  stentors 

In  starving  samples  of  coeruleus  and  even  rarely  in  normal 
cultures  one  finds  stentors  which  are  nearly  devoid  of  pigment 
granules  and  appear  colorless.  Stolte  (1922)  thought  that  the 
amount  of  pigmentation  is  a  function  of  metabolism  and  decreases 
with  decreasing  oxygen  tension,  but  the  presence  of  both  green 
and  white  forms  in  the  same  culture  or  sample  implies  that  external 
conditions  are  not  wholly  determinative.  Colorless  coeruleus  were 
seen  by  Schuberg  (1890),  Johnson  (1893),  and  Gelei  (1927). 
Johnson  concluded  that  the  pigment  granules  had  been  excreted 
or  ejected,  because  green  clots  were  found  in  the  sample  dish  or 
attached  near  the  base  of  the  stentors.  In  my  observation  white 
coeruleus  retain  a  very  few  pigment  granules  in  bands  which  then 
appear  not  granular  but  trabecular,  indicating  that  the  granular 
bands  do  have  some  intrinsic  structure.    Hetherington  (1932b) 


METABOLISM  275 

said  that  pale  stentors  were  often  infected  by  a  great  number  of 
bacilli  and  that  normal  ones  showed  none.  A  pathological  cause 
seems  unnecessary,  however,  because  every  time  I  isolated  one  of 
these  stentors  the  normal  coloration  was  eventually  regenerated. 
Why  an  occasional  stentor  should  pass  through  this  depigmented 
stage  remains  a  mystery  and  problem.  A  suggestive  parallel  is 
found  in  the  chimera  studies,  in  which  a  small  graft  oi polymorphus 
causes  the  depigmentation  of  a  coeruleus  host. 

(b)    OVER-PIGMENTED   STENTORS 

Sometimes  one  finds  stentors  which  are  very  dark  in  color, 
appearing  deep  red  by  reflected  Hght.  Such  animals  may  appear  in 
the  same  culture  in  which  depigmented  stentors  are  found  and 
have  also  been  observed  to  be  capable  of  oral  reorganization  and 
to  recover  the  normal  pigmentation.  Generally  these  ''reds"  were 
smaller  and  thinner  than  normal  stentors,  and  lacking  in  food 
vacuoles,  but  the  nucleus  appeared  normal.  The  pigmentation  of 
the  granular  stripes  is  in  these  specimens  supplemented  by  an 
overload  of  pigment  granules  in  the  endoplasm.  Though  some 
recover,  others  become  exceedingly  abnormal  and  are  characterized 


b 


Fig,  76.    Over-pigmented  phase  of  S.  coeruleus. 

A.  Such  specimens  are  smaller  than  the  average  (to  the  left) 
probably  by   undernourishment   because   they   show   no   food 

vacuoles,  and  the  coloration  is  very  dark  blue-green. 

B.  Later  stage,  showing  disorganization,  some  extraordinarily 
broad  pigment  stripes,  and  abundant  pigment  granules  inside. 

Alternatively  such  animals  may  return  to  normal. 


276  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

by  extraordinarily  wide  pigment  stripes  in  some  areas  of  the 
ectoplasm,  which  again  suggests  that  an  oversupply  of  granules 
is  present  and  crowding  to  expand  the  stripes  (Fig.  76). 


A 


B 


Fig.  77.   Autonomously  developing  amorphous  ^S.  coeriileus. 


METABOLISM  277 

(c)  Amorphous  stentors 

These  bizarre  specimens  first  appeared  in  crowded  samples  in 
small  dishes  which  were  kept  for  two  weeks  or  more  without  added 
nutrient  (Tartar,  i959f).  They  have  also  sometimes  developed  in 
animals  isolated  on  slides.  The  usual  course  of  changes  leading  to 
gross  abnormalities  is  shown  in  Fig.  77A.  The  animals  are  first 
noticed  as  longer  and  narrower  than  usual.  Then  appears  a  central 
mass  of  compact  pigment  granules  which  later  becomes  sharply 
delimited  from  the  surrounding  cytoplasm.  The  form  is  increas- 
ingly long  and  snake-like.  Eventually  much  of  the  cytoplasm  is 
concentrated  at  the  anterior  end  in  a  bouton,  while  a  long  tail 
dangles  behind  resulting  in  a  characteristic  tadpole  or  vorticellid 


A.  Course  of  development,  a:  Possible  initial  stage  in  which 
internal  pigment  granules  accumulate  among  the  carbohydrate 
reserves,  h:  Narrow  "  snake  "  form  with  sharply  bounded  pig- 
ment mass  but  normal-appearing  macronucleus.  c:  Bulbous 
* 'tadpole"  form  with  long  tail  and  transverse  stripe  arrangement 
anteriorly,  d:  Increasing  abnormality  of  shape  and  defective 
stomatogenesis  though  nuclear  nodes  appear  normal,  e: 
Recovery  of  one  such  specimen,  with  pigmented  core  lost, 
normal  feeding  organelles  and  nearly  normal  shape.  /;  Usual 
course     tow^ard     completely     amorphous     condition     showing 

projecting  processes  and  followed  by  death. 

B.  Transmission  of  abnormality  to  normal  stentor.  a: 
Amorphous  stentor  grafted  in  place  of  head  of  a  normal,  in  ratio 
of  about  1:8  by  volume,  h:  Gross  abnormality  developed 
throughout  by  next  day.  c:  "Tadpole"  stage,  with  new  reorgani- 
zation peristome  but  no  mouthparts.  d:  Amorphous  by  day  4 
of  the  experiment,  pigmented  core  now  rather  diffuse.   Specimen 

later  recovered  somewhat  but  died  on  the  slide. 

C.  Similar  abnormality  produced  by  grafting  normal 
polymorphiis  to  normal  coerideus.  a:  Enucleated  polymorphus 
without  symbionts  grafted  to  coerideus  in  proportions  by  volume 
of  1:4.  b:  Reorganized  as  a  doublet  with  good  integration  of 
shape,  but  almost  all  of  the  cerulean  pigment  lost  by  influence 
of  the  graft,  c:  Elongated  form  with  large  core  of  unpigmented 
granules.    Nuclear  nodes  appear  normal,    d:  Development  of 

amorphous  condition.    Time-span  shown:  7  days. 

D.  Photograph  of  amorphous  coeruleus  in  various  stages  of 
development:  a:  elongated  cell;  b:  bulbous  form;  c:  complete 

loss  of  normal  form. 


278  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

shape.  Finally,  the  animals  become  completely  amorphous, 
showing  incomplete  feeding  organelles  and  finger-like  processes 
extending  out  from  the  mass  in  all  directions. 

In  these  abnormal  forms  the  nucleus  appears  quite  normal. 
There  are  several  indications  that  the  nucleus  is  not  involved. 
Pigmented  cores  have  also  appeared  in  enucleated  stentors;  but 
these  generally  did  not  live  long  enough,  apparently,  to  develop 
the  amorphous  shape.  When  nuclei  from  abnormals  were  sub- 
stituted in  normal  stentors  no  abnormality  resulted;  but  when 
abnormal  cytoplasm  was  added  by  grafting  to  normals,  the  whole 
fusion  mass  usually  became  and  remained  aberrant.  Whole  normal 
cells  were  grafted  to  abnormal  whole  cells.  In  about  half  the  cases 
normals  resulted;  in  the  remainder,  a  normal  stentor,  even  when 
predominant  in  volume,  was  converted  into  an  abnormal,  and  this 
might  even  occur  overnight.  (Fig.  77B). 

Amorphous  animals  could  also  be  simulated  by  coeruleus  to 
which  a  minor  piece  of  colorless  polymorphus  was  grafted.  Some- 
times the  central  mass  was  of  colored  pigment  granules,  in  other 
cases  the  mass  was  colorless  but  granular  (Fig.  77c).  In  the  latter, 
the  mass  may  have  been  composed  of  depigmented  coeruleus 
granules  or  possibly  of  the  non-pigmented  ectoplasmic  granules 
typical  oi  polymorphus. 

In  some  instances  it  was  demonstrated  that  tadpole-shaped 
abnormals  could  recover  if  transferred  onto  a  slide  with  fresh 
medium,  but  the  introduction  of  normal  animals  into  fluid  dishes 
in  which  abnormals  had  appeared  did  not  result  in  their  becoming 
promptly  abnormal.  Therefore  changes  in  the  medium  do  not 
seem  to  induce  this  condition.  Racial  differences  may  be  more 
important.  Three  races  of  coeruleus  produced  abnormal  stentors 
when  starved,  but  five  did  not. 

The  development  of  such  amorphous  forms  is  much  in  contrast 
to  the  usually  amazing  capacity  of  stentors  to  return  to  normal 
after  the  most  drastic  operations  and  disturbances.  A  connection 
with  cancer  or  abnormal  growth  is  suggested,  first,  by  the  stentor  — 
as  an  organism  —  "going  wild",  and  second  —  as  a  cell  — 
transforming,  among  its  normal  fellows,  into  a  pathological  type. 

Treatments  which  prevent  or  hinder  primordiiim  formation 
may  do  so  by  disrupting  the  basis  of  protein  synthesis,  and  these 


METABOLISM  279 

have  already  been  summarized   in  the  section  on  blockage  of 
regeneration  (p.  132). 

Speaking  generally,  metabolism  studies  on  Stentor  may  be 
fruitful  in  two  directions.  Demonstration  of  metabolic  similarities 
between  these  and  other  animals  would  prove  the  appropriateness 
of  using  the  special  advantages  of  Stentor  in  pursuing  problems  of 
"universal  biochemistry".  In  addition,  stentors  may  reveal  or 
provide  initial  discoveries  of  features  of  metabolism  hitherto 
unknown. 


CHAPTER    XVI 

BEHAVIOR   AND    FUNCTIONS 
OF  THE  NUCLEUS 

Stentors  have  two  kinds  of  nuclei,  yet  the  nuclear  story  can  be 
simplified  because  the  role  of  the  micronuclei  may  be  stated 
briefly.  On  some  signal  from  the  cytoplasm  during  fission  they 
divide  and  reproduce  themselves  by  typical  ciliate  endomitosis. 
This  also  occurs  during  the  related  cycles  of  reorganization  and 
regeneration,  in  which  the  cytoplasm  is  similarly  activated  to  oral 
primordium  formation.  Although  multiplication  in  these  two 
processes  may  be  meaningless,  that  during  fission  obviously 
assures  the  continued  presence  of  micronuclei,  available  for  their 
single  known  function,  namely,  to  produce  a  new  macronucleus 
after  sexual  reproduction  or  conjugation.  In  this,  their  performance 
is  indeed  complex  and  will  be  described  in  the  following  chapter. 
But  for  the  vegetative  life  of  stentors  the  micronuclei  are 
demonstrably  without  significance.  In  a  few  ciliates  bearmg  a 
single,  non- vesiculate,  ''massive  type"  micronucleus  the  situation 
may  be  otherwise.  By  massive  type  is  meant  that  the  micronucleus 
is  relatively  large  and  appears  on  staining  to  have  a  consistency 
much  like  that  of  the  macronucleus.  Thus  in  Ur onychia  transfuga 
(Calkins,  1911a),  Euplotes  patella  (Taylor  and  Farber,  1924; 
Reynolds,  1932),  and  in  Paramecium  caudatum  and  bursaria 
(Schwartz,  1934,  1947;  Tartar,  1940),  excision  of  the  single 
micronucleus  is  immediately  felt  and  manifests  itself  in  defective 
regeneration  or  reduced  rate  of  fission,  though  later  adjustments 
may  correct  these  deficiencies.  But  in  Stentor  coeruleus  which  has 
numerous  vesiculate  micronuclei,  a  careful  study  by  Schwartz 
(1934,  1935)  has  shown  that  the  micronuclei  may  be  entirely 
removed  without  any  appreciable  effect  on  the  macronucleated 
cell;  and  conversely,  that,  as  in  Bursaria  according  to  Schmahl 
(1926),  in  the  absence  of  the  macronucleus  micronuclei  which  are 
present  are  not  only  unable  to  carry  on  the  life  of  the  cell  but  are 

280 


BEHAVIOR    AND    FUNCTIONS    OF    THE    NUCLEUS         281 

incapable,  without  the  stimulation  accompanying  the  process  of 
conjugation,  of  regenerating  the  macronucleus.  This  result  is 
fortunate  indeed,  permitting  us  to  neglect  the  micronuclei  which 
cannot  be  seen  in  the  living  animal  and  would  be  most  difficult  to 
work  with.  Schwartz's  demonstration  of  the  ineffectiveness  of  the 
micronuclei  must  have  been  confirmed  many  times  in  the  study 
of  emacronucleate  stentors;  for  although  most  of  the  adhering 
micronuclei  are  no  doubt  removed  with  the  macronucleus,  a  few 
scattered  ones  probably  remain,  yet  these  specimens  never 
regenerate  nor  long  survive.  In  what  follows  we  shall  therefore  be 
concerned  only  with  the  macronucleus,  designating  it  as  such  or 
simply  by  the  word  nucleus. 

I.  Location  of  the  macronucleus 

In  small  species  of  Stentor,  such  as  igneus  and  multiformis ,  the 
nucleus  is  a  single  ovoid  mass  near  the  center  of  the  cell ;  but  in 
forms  like  coeriileus  and  polymorphus,  which  are  about  a  hundred 
times  larger,  the  nucleus  consists  of  many  parts  or  nodes  in  linear 
sequence  within  a  common  nuclear  membrane.  In  between,  there 
is  roeseli  with  an  elongated,  nodulated  nucleus  and  niger  which  is 
about  the  same  size  but  has  the  compact  nucleus.  It  may  be 
significant  that  nodulation  after  division  is  delayed  in  roeseli 
(Johnson,  1893)  so  that  for  a  considerable  time  the  nucleus  has  a 
rod  shape,  which  might  be  considered  a  transition  form.  The 
species  niger  is  conspicuously  slow  and  lackadaisical  in  its  swim- 
ming movements.  Phylogenetically  this  suggests  that  the  former  is 
on  the  way  to  developing  a  moniliform  nucleus  out  of  one  which  is 
rod  shaped  and  arose  by  elongation  of  the  compact  form,  as  well 
as  that  the  latter  is  pushing  the  cell  size  as  far  as  it  can  go  on  a 
compact  nucleus  whose  surface  area  of  interaction  with  the  cyto- 
plasm is  minimal  with  reference  to  the  volume  of  nuclear  material. 
The  chain  nucleus  of  a  form  like  coeriileus  of  course  passes  through 
rod  and  spheroid  phases  during  division  and  other  times  when 
there  is  oral  primordium  formation.  These  changes  in  form  led 
Johnson  to  the  conjecture  that  ontogeny  is  here  repeating  a 
phylogeny  in  which  the  compact  form  of  the  nucleus  can  be 
assumed  to  be  the  most  primitive. 

We  shall  confine  our  discussion  to  the  well-studied  chain  nucleus 
of  coeruleus,  but  this  description  will  serve  fairly  well  for  all  species 


282  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

with  moniliform  nuclei.  There  is  apparently  a  standard  pattern 
for  the  distribution  of  nuclear  material  in  all  large  species.  The 
essential  point  is  that  with  remarkable  constancy  the  macronucleus 
tends  toward  a  definite  arrangement  with  reference  to  the  topo- 
graphy of  the  cell  and  that  if  this  pattern  is  not  fulfilled  or  if 
artificially  disturbed  the  nodes  can  and  do  move  in  such  a  way 
that  they  tend  to  recover  the  normal  arrangement. 

The  typical  disposition  of  the  nuclear  beads  is  shown  in  Fig.  78A. 
With  the  possible  exception  of  a  few  of  the  posterior  nodes  the 
nucleus  is  usually  entirely  subcortical  in  its  location.  This  is  no 
doubt  why  it  can  remain  fixed  in  position;  because  it  adheres  to 
the  inside  of  the  ectoplasm.  We  do  not  say  attached,  because  one 
has  to  allow  for  the  movement  of  the  nucleus  during  clumping  and 
in  the  correction  of  disarrangements.  Generally,  the  longest  part 
of  the  nucleus  is  a  row  of  nodes  extending  almost  directly 
posteriorly  under  the  surface  near  the  meridian  which  connects 
the  mouth  with  the  posterior  pole  and  considerably  to  the  right 
of  the  primordium  site.  From  this  row,  beads  extend  around  the 
anterior  end  of  the  cell  to  the  right  for  some  distance,  while  at  the 
other  end  the  row  bends  back  on  itself  and  terminates  in  several 
beads  which  seem  to  be  rather  indefinite  in  their  location  though 
they  tend  to  place  themselves  on  the  opposite  or  left  side.  I  think 
this  arrangement  is  what  one  would  expect  if  he  had  to  work  with  a 
nucleus  of  minimal  length  for  the  sake  of  economy,  to  fasten  it 
inside  the  cell  so  that  it  would  not  "fall  to  the  bottom",  have 
every  point  in  the  cytoplasm  as  close  as  possible  to  some  nuclear 
material,  and  place  the  nucleus  as  near  as  manageable  to  the  most 
active  regions  (the  membranellar  band,  the  mouthparts,  the 
primordium  site,  and  the  holdfast),  while  keeping  it  out  of  the  way 
of  the  migrating  primordium,  i.e.,  to  assure  that  the  ectoplasm 
under  which  it  lies  will  not  undergo  major  shifts  of  position.  The 
actual  deployment  fulfills  these  assumed  requirements. 

Having  made  these  statements,  we  now  have  to  qualify  them  by 
saying  that  the  nucleus  is  not  always  in  the  same  position,  as  well 
as  that  its  precise  location  is  evidently  not  essential  to  the  economy 
of  the  cell.  The  first  of  these  qualifications  is  documented  in 
Fig.  78B,  which  shows  a  number  of  the  atypical  arrangements 
which  have  been  found  in  stentors  fished  out  of  regular  cultures 
in  which  the   majority  of  individuals  showed  a  more  normal 


BEHAVIOR    AND    FUNCTIONS   OF    THE    NUCLEUS         283 

distribution  of  the  macronucleus.  Several  of  these  forms  have 
already  been  described  by  Stolte  (1922).  He  associated  chains 
having  noticeably  recurved  ends  with  interdivisional  addition  of 
new  nodes ;  and  he  observed  that  in  stentors  with  double,  parallel 


Fig.  78.    Location  of  the  macronucleus  in  S.  coeruleus. 

A.  Normal  location,  with  post-oral  row,  right  anterior  wing, 

and  recurved  terminal  chain. 

B.  Atypical  macronuclear  arrangements  appearing  autono- 
mously, including  (a)  secondary  row,  (b)  forked  chain,  (c) 
coiling  and  posterior  shift,  (d)  scattered  nodes  (whether  con- 
nected was  not  determined),  and  (e)  "situs  inversus"  in  animals 

of  reversed  asymmetry. 

C.  Divider  with  13  nodes  and  posterior  end  excised  produced 
proter  with  17  small  nodes  in  normal  location  and  opisthe  with 

13  in  a  ring,  later  becoming  liistributed  normally. 

D.  Doublet  produced  by  engrafting  an  extra  primordium 
site  (without  nucleus)  in  time  develops  double  macronuclear 
chain,  each  deployed  normally  with  respect  to  the  stripe  pattern. 

E.  When  such  a  doublet  reverts  to  single  form  the  macro- 

nuclear chain  becomes  single  correspondingly. 


284  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

nuclear  chains  this  condition  is  corrected  after  clumping  and 
renodulation  in  division.  Stolte  also  made  much  of  divergence  from 
the  normal  picture  w^ith  regard  to  the  nucleus  which  occurs  in 
highly  vacuolated  stentors.  But  in  pathological  material  one  cannot 
be  sure  that  the  vacuoles  push  the  nuclear  nodes  out  of  place, 
since  the  necrotic  condition  could  affect  the  nucleus  directly. 
Certainly  the  vacuoles  do  not  push  the  nucleus  to  the  periphery 
of  the  cell,  as  he  said,  because  it  is  there  already. 

In  regard  to  the  second  qualification  —  that  the  nucleus  need  not 
be  at  a  special  place  —  v^e  have  the  evidence  that  in  stentors  in 
which  all  but  one  nuclear  node  has  been  removed  this  bead  may 
be  variously  located,  yet  such  animals  can  survive  and  regenerate. 
Still  more  satisfactory  tests  could  easily  be  devised  by  shifting  the 
whole  nucleus  in  such  a  way  that  it  could  not  soon  recover  the 
normal  location,  and  it  would  be  especially  interesting  to  determine 
whether  the  nucleus,  separated  by  a  narrow  neck  of  cytoplasm  from 
the  major  portion  of  the  cell,  could  support  regeneration  and  growth 
by  diffusions  across  this  bridge. 

Certain  regular  changes  in  the  distribution  of  the  nucleus  may 
now  be  noted.  When  the  posterior  end  of  coeruleiis  was  cut  off  in 
mid-fission  it  was  consistently  found  that  after  renodulation  the 
nucleus  in  the  opisthe  had  at  first  an  abnormal  arrangement,  but 
the  typical  disposition  was  later  achieved  (Fig.  78c).  When  graft 
complexes  become  persisting  doublets  the  nuclear  chain  is  dupli- 
cated even  though  the  specimen  started  with  but  one  (d),  and  when 
doublets  transform  back  into  singles  they  soon  achieve  a  normal, 
single  chain  (e).  In  Fig.  59c  we  have  a  stentor  developing  a 
secondary  tail-pole  which  later  became  furnished  with  an  extension 
of  the  nuclear  chain. 

Similar  deviations  in  the  location  of  the  nucleus  in  abnormal 
forms  have  been  observed  in  the  related  genus  Condylostoma 
(Yagiu,  1951,  1952).  The  simplest  explanation  of  these  cases  would 
be  that  the  stripe  pattern  guides  the  location  of  the  macronuclear 
nodes.  And  the  best  substantiation  thereof  is  that  in  cases  of 
reversed  asymmetry,  with  the  same  cell  shape  as  in  normal  animals, 
the  macronucleus  assumes  a  reversed  location  (see  Fig.  49). 

2.  Clumping  of  the  nucleus 

Typically,  all  nodes  of  the  moniliform  nucleus  lie  within  a  single 


BEHAVIOR    AND    FUNCTIONS    OF    THE    NUCLEUS         285 

nuclear  membrane,  doubtless  facilitating  their  coalescence  into 
one  mass  during  oral  redifferentiation  and  especially  in  division. 
When  fully  deployed  the  strand  connecting  individual  nodes  may 
be  exceedingly  tenuous  (Fig.  79),  yet  rarely  do  terminal  nodes  break 
off  and  not  participate  in  coalescence  during  fission.  Opinions 
differ  regarding  whether  separated  nodes  or  sections  of  the  nucleus 
can  rejoin  their  fellows.  Stolte  (1922)  observed  that  broken  nuclear 
chains  in  vacuolated  dividers  condense  separately,  and  I  too  have 
found  occasionally  a  double  fusion  mass;  but  he  stated  categori- 
cally that  permanent  reunion  was  not  possible  because  the  nuclei 
were  within  separate  membranes.  This  supposed  behavior  is, 
however,  contrary  to  common  experience  with  hypotrichs,  such 
as  Oxytricha,  in  which  widely  separated  macronuclei,  for  which 
there  is  no  evidence  of  a  common  boundary,  nevertheless  fuse  at 
every  division.  Much  earlier,  Prowazek  (1904)  had  reported  that 
transected  nuclear  chains  "  regenerated"  separately,  producing  two 
rows  of  beads;  but  whether  the  nuclear  volume  was  doubled  he 
did  not  tell  us.  It  is  probable  that  the  normal  nucleo-cytoplasmic 
ratio  was  not  upset. 

Weisz  (1949a)  reported  that  broken  nuclear  chains  can  rejoin. 
I  severed  the  nuclear  strand  in  coeruleus  into  five  or  more  pieces 
and  its  distribution  was  then  for  a  while  disturbed,  but  the  animals 
later  became  normal  to  all  appearances,  with  the  nodes  closely 
approximated  in  a  single  uniform  row  in  the  usual  location 


A 


Fig.  79.    Photographs  of  S.  coeruleus  showing  macronucleus  as 

seen  (A)  in  living  stentor  against  dark  field  and  (B)  after  feulgen 

staining  to  reveal  intemodal  connections. 


286  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

(unpublished).  Such  nuclei  have  not  yet  been  examined  after 
staining;  all  we  can  say  is  that  either  separated  nodes  fall  into 
perfect  alignment  or  they  are  able  to  rejoin  and  become  enclosed 
again  in  the  common  membrane.  The  latter  seems  more  probable. 

Coalescence  begins  at  both  terminals  and  progresses  toward 
the  mid-nodes,  as  Weisz  (1950b)  and  others  have  noted.  How  is 
this  accomplished?  Stolte  suggested  fusion  by  swelling  of  the  nodes, 
but  I  think  what  he  observed  was  simply  the  coalescence  of  the 
individual  nodes  into  larger  ones;  and  there  certainly  does  not 
appear  to  be  an  increase  in  the  total  volume  of  the  nucleus  during 
condensation  as  his  suggestion  would  imply.  More  probably, 
internodal  connections  swell  while  the  nuclear  membrane  contracts 
and  decreases  greatly  in  area. 

There  remains  to  be  conjectured  why  the  chain  nucleus  should 
clump  at  all.  In  both  Loxodes  (Balbiani,  1893)  and  in  Dileptus 
(Jones,  1 951)  there  is  a  distributed  nucleus  consisting  of  many 
separate  macronuclei  and  these  do  not  fuse  during  division  and 
regeneration.  Coalescence  therefore  seems  not  absolutely  necessary 
in  the  life  of  ciliates,  though  it  may  bring  advantages.  That  no 
nuclear  changes  occur  until  the  oral  primordium  is  nearly  com- 
pletely developed,  as  Balbiani  (1893)  first  emphasized,  does  not 
suggest  that  either  coalescence  or  moving  all  parts  of  the  nucleus 
close  to  the  primordium  is  necessary  to  its  development.  Hence 
Balbiani  did  not  share  Gruber's  idea  that  clumping  is  to  give  a 
single,  central  guidance  to  morphogenetic  events,  because  these 
processes  are  nearly  completed  before  the  nucleus  fuses;  and 
besides,  the  macronuclear  chain  is  all  one  nucleus  anyway. 
Balbiani's  suggestion  was  therefore  that  the  nucleus  concentrates 
in  order  to  have  the  greatest  effect ;  but  the  action  of  the  nucleus  is 
more  likely  to  be  promoted  by  increasing  rather  than  by  decreasing 
its  surface.  As  already  mentioned,  Johnson  held  that  coalescence 
of  the  nuclear  chain  is  an  instance  of  Haeckel's  law  of  recapitulation 
and  hence  is  performed  for  "historical"  reasons.  That  the  macro- 
nucleus  clumps  in  order  to  insure  equal  division  through  the  simple 
splitting  of  a  compact  mass  has  also  been  suggested  (Sonneborn, 
1947),  but  in  Stentor  at  least,  clumping  does  not  insure  this  end 
(see  p.  71).  Many  hypotrichs  like  Eiiplotes  produce  reorganization 
bands  at  every  division  and  somehow  transform  or  rework  the 
macronucleus ;  yet  in  Stentor  no  one  has  found  evidence  of  any 


BEHAVIOR    AND    FUNCTIONS    OF    THE    NUCLEUS         287 

such  change  in  the  fine  structure  of  the  nucleus  during  clumping 
and  renodulation.  According  to  certain  of  Weisz's  findings  (see 
below),  coalescence  of  the  macronucleus  would  be  necessary  for 
homogenization  after  individual  nodes  at  its  extremities  had 
become  diverse,  but  this  diversity  could  not  be  confirmed.  It  may 
be  that  the  nucleus  in  stentors  coalesces  into  a  single  mass  in  order 
to  make  possible  its  complete  renodulation  (Tartar,  1957b);  for 
in  division  the  nucleus  produces  at  one  stroke  about  twice  the 
number  of  the  original  nodes  which  are  now  half-sized.  This  could 
explain  why  coalescence  is  often  not  complete  in  regeneration  and 
reorganization :  because  the  nucleus  will  generally  return  to  about 
the  same  size  and  number  of  nodes. 

3.  Nodulation 

Following  fusion  into  a  compact  mass  the  macronucleus  extends 
to  a  long  and  conspicuous  rod  or  sausage  shape  which  is  then 
renodulated,  again,  generally  from  both  ends  towards  the  middle. 
An  exception  is  roeselt,  in  which  node  formation  proceeds  only 
from  the  anterior  end. 

As  Johnson  described  it,  nodulation  seems  to  involve  the  aggre- 
gation of  chromatic  substance  into  serial  packets  separated  by  clear 
nuclear  material  where  constriction  then  occurs;  and  he  also 
remarked  that  the  new  nodes  are  usually  "  beautifully  symmetrical 
and  alike  in  size".  Rarely  there  is  produced  a  forked  nucleus  or 
nuclear  chain  with  a  side  branch  (Fig.  78B),  of  which  Johnson 
illustrated  one  case  in  coeruleus,  also  noting  that  Stein  (1867) 
showed  a  similar  case  in polymorphus.  The  same  have  been  observed 
in  Condylostoma  (Yagiu,  1952)  and  in  Spirostomum  ambiguum 
(Bishop,  1927).  These  may  be  ectopic  rejoinings  of  separated 
parts  of  the  nucleus  with  the  main  strand. 

Even  after  the  period  of  renodulation,  the  number  of  nodes  can 
undergo  small  changes,  reduction  through  fusion  of  adjacent  nodes, 
or  increase  either  by  the  splitting  of  one  node  into  two  or  by  the 
interpolation  of  new  nodes  between  existing  ones  (Fig.  8oa).  It  is  not 
uncommon  to  find  dumbbell-shaped  nodes  or  one  or  more  tiny 
nodes  lying  between  the  larger.  Prowazek  (1904)  first  described 
a  step-wise  increase  in  nodal  number,  and  his  account  was 
generally  corroborated  by  Schwartz  (1935).  According  to  the 
earlier  investigator  a  node  may  either  split  in  two  or  part  of  its 


288 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


substance  may  travel  along  the  tube-like  internodal  connections, 
stopping  between  two  nodes  and  growing  into  a  new  one.  Weisz 
(1949a)  stated  that  extra  nodes  are  thus  interpolated  whenever  the 
strand  between  two  nodes  measures  approximately  2  nodal 
diameters  or  more.  Yet  it  should  be  emphasized  that  major  nuclear 
increases  occur  only  following  primordium  formation  in  division, 
regeneration,  and  reorganization. 


Fig.  80.    Aspects  of  macronuclear  nodulation  in  S.  coeruleus, 

A.  Diagram  of  two  means  by  which  single  nodes  appear  to  be 
added:  {x)  by  division  and  {y)  by  interpolation  between  nodes. 

B.  When  the  clumped  macronucleus  of  a  stage-6  regenerator 
is  excised  with  a  small  amount  of  cytoplasm,  the  primordium 
completes  stomatogenesis  and  the  nucleus  attempts  to  renodulate 

though  isolated  and  confined. 

C.  When  coalesced  nucleus  of  a  divider  is  sliced  into  several 
times,  the  macronucleus  is  divided  but  fails  to  renodulate,  doing 
so  only  much  later  after  regeneration  is  induced  by  excision  of 

mouthparts  without  injury  to  the  nucleus. 

I  have  found  that  when  the  clumped  nucleus  of  a  divider  is 
isolated  into  a  small  volume  of  cytoplasm  it  nevertheless  attempts 
to  renodulate  in  spite  of  the  confinement  (Fig.  8ob).  This  suggests 
that  the  impulse  to  nodulation  is  intrinsic  with  the  nucleus  itself 
since  the  nuclear  environment  was  so  completely  altered.  Individual 
nodes  are  very  tough  and  resistant  to  cutting  but  the  clumped 
nucleus  can  easily  be  slashed  through  with  a  glass  needle.  In  the 


BEHAVIOR    AND    FUNCTIONS    OF    THE    NUCLEUS         289 

few  cases  in  which  this  has  been  done  in  dividers,  subsequent 
nodulation  was  inhibited  (unpubUshed).  The  nucleus  extended  as 
a  rod  but  remained  as  such  without  any  further  change  until 
regeneration  was  induced  by  excising  the  mouthparts,  whereupon 
the  normal  nucleus  was  recovered  (Fig.  80c).  Therefore,  although 
nodulation  may  be  intrinsic,  the  stimulus  for  it  is  given  by  the 
cytoplasm  during  the  last  stages  of  oral  redifferentiation. 

As  previously  discussed  in  the  chapter  on  division,  daughter 
cells  have  about  the  same  number  of  nodes  as  the  parent  (see  Fig. 
78c).  Therefore  coalescence  of  the  macronucleus  may  be  necessary 
for  its  rapid  renodulation  into  twice  the  number  of  nodes  of  about 
half  the  size  of  the  originals  during  fission. 

4.  Equivalence  of  macronuclear  nodes 

Nuclear  fusions  and  clumping  were  also  simply  explained  as  a 
means  for  recovering  uniformity  in  parts  which  have  become 
diverse.  In  substantiation  of  this  presupposition,  Weisz  (1949c) 
claimed  that  an  intranuclear  difference  does  regularly  develop 
during  divisional  and  reorganizational  cycles  in  coeruleus,  posterior 
nodes  (but  not  posterior  cytoplasm)  becoming  increasingly  incap- 
able of  supporting  regeneration  or  even  of  maintaining  oral  and 
caudal  organelles  as  they  approach  the  time  of  coalescence.  Fusion 
was  then  said  to  restore  normal  potency  throughout  the  renodulated 
macronucleus.  Development  and  obliteration  of  differences  seemed 
to  be  correlated  with  degree  of  polymerization  of  nuclear  DNA  as 
tested  by  methyl  green  staining  (Weisz,  i95o.b),  though  the  reli- 
ability of  this  determination  was  later  questioned  (1954). 

A  similar  development  of  intranuclear  heterogeneity  was 
proposed  for  Blepharisma  (Weisz,  1949),  but  in  this  case  the  mid- 
portion  of  the  macronucleus  which  no  longer  supported  regenera- 
tion was  destined  for  extrusion  and  dissolution  anyway.  The 
general  conception  is  brought  further  into  question  by  Weisz's 
interpretation  that  proximity  to  organelles  is  the  basis  for  main- 
tenance of  potency  in  adjacent  nodes;  for  the  mouthparts  in 
Blepharisma  are  near  the  level  of  the  mid-nodes  which  should 
therefore  retain  their  full  capacities ;  and  in  Stentor,  the  posterior 
nodes  should  support  maintenance  and  regeneration  of  the  hold- 
fast, contrary  to  Weisz's  own  account.  Since  even  enucleate  frag- 
ments can  regenerate  the  foot  (Tartar,  1956c),  it  is  indicated  that 


290 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


the  conditions  in  Weisz's  experiments  were  not  optimal.  Further- 
more, Suzuki  (1957)  could  find  no  evidence  for  differences  in  the 
potentiality  of  parts  of  the  nucleus  in  Blepharisma  at  any  stage. 
Above  all,  I  was  unable  by  similar  experiments  to  confirm  that  a 
regular  and  recurring  difference  develops  between  the  serial  nodes 
of  the  nucleus  (Tartar,  1957b).  I  tested  five  different  races  of 
coeruleus  and  observed  not  only  oral  regeneration  but  also  recon- 
stitution  of  the  nuclear  chain  from  a  single  node  and  the  capacity 
of  fragments  to  reproduce  indefinitely  in  clones.  For  comparison 
I  studied  Condylostomum  magnum^  which  is  a  very  long  ciliate 
with  mouthparts  far  to  one  end  and  a  uniform  chain  nucleus 
running  the  length  of  the  body.  If  posterior  nodes  regularly 
become  depotentiated,  the  same  should  be  manifested  in  this  form 
even  more  than  in  Stentor.  It  was  found  that  even  the  single, 
terminal  posterior  node  in  many  cases  or  at  least  the  last  four 
could  support  complete  oral  regeneration  at  any  stage  (Fig.  81). 
In  stentors  (where  this  was  tested)  pre-fissional  and  pre-reorganiza- 
tional  fragments  with  only  such  nodes  could  give  rise  to  viable 
lines  with  normal  chain  nuclei. 


Fig.  81.     Equivalence  of  macronuclear  nodes  in  (A)   Stentor 

coeruleus  and  (B)  Condylostoma  magnum.  Tiny  fragments  of  early 

dividers,  carrying  only  a  few  of  the  most  anterior  or  posterior 

nodes,  are  capable  of  regeneration  and  more. 


Evidently  intranuclear  differentiation  is  neither  necessary  for 
nor  the  consequence  of  cytoplasmic  differentiation  in  ciliates.  We 
can  therefore  return  with  confidence  to  the  old  dictum  that  any 


BEHAVIOR    AND    FUNCTIONS    OF    THE    NUCLEUS         291 

portion  of  the  macronucleUvS  is  sufficient  for  regeneration  and 
survival,  implying  that  this  nucleus  is  highly  polyploid,  with 
representation  of  the  complete  genome  throughout.  The  develop- 
ment of  internuclQSir  differences  as  in  mating  type  determination 
in  certain  ciHates  is  of  course  a  demonstrated  fact.  Had  regular 
intranuclear  differences  been  confirmed,  we  would  have  been 
provided  with  another  and  most  excellent  means  for  analyzing 
nuclear  functions.  Our  disappointment  is  however  mitigated  by 
the  consequence  that  we  are  now  apparently  free  to  continue 
experiments  on  ciliates  without  having  to  take  into  consideration 
an  additional  factor  of  varying  capacities  within  the  macronucleus. 

5.  Shape,  size  and  number  of  nuclear  nodes 

When  he  removed  all  but  a  single  node  of  the  macronucleus 
from  coeruleuSy  Prowazek  (1904)  found  that  the  remaining  bead 
became  much  elongated  and  spindle  shaped.  Schwartz  (1935) 
observed  the  same,  as  well  as  that  the  remaining  node  may 
become  much  flattened  like  a  ribbon.  Cases  from  my  own  observa- 
tion are  shown  in  Figs.  82A  and  86c.  These  increases  in  the  nodal 
surface  are  as  if  to  compensate  somewhat  for  the  great  diminution 
in  nuclear  volume. 

Starting  from  a  single  node,  the  nuclear  chain  is  regenerated 
during  episodes  of  primordium  formation.  Two  reorganizations 
seem  to  be  required  to  recover  the  typical  nodal  number  from  a 
single  bead.  This  number  is  quite  variable  and  in  coeruleus  is 
between  6  and  20,  with  a  mode  around  15.  K.  M.  Moller  (unpub- 
lished) has  a  race  with  a  mode  of  lo-ii  nodes  and  suspects  that 
the  average  number  may  prove  to  be  a  racial  characteristic.  When 
de  Terra  (1959)  implanted  into  enucleate  coeruleus  2  macronuclear 
nodes  labeled  with  adenine-Ci4  she  found  that  the  regenerated 
nuclear  chain  was  labeled  throughout,  confirming  the  cytological 
picture  that  this  regenerative  growth  is  not  accomplished  by  simple 
addition  of  new  nodes.  Instead,  the  implanted  nodes  increased 
greatly  in  size,  coalesced,  and  renodulated  into  many  nuclear  beads 
from  a  common  pool  of  macronuclear  material. 

Although  the  nucleus  readily  adapts  by  increase  in  size,  the 
occasions  when  it  should  decrease  give  an  entirely  different 
impression.  It  appears  difficult  for  the  cell  to  take  down  or  diminish 
a    too-large    macronucleus.    Starving    stentors    with    decreasing 


292 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF     STENTOR 


cytoplasmic  volume  (Allescher,  19 12),  or  animals  regenerated  from 
fragments  with  proportionately  too  much  nucleus,  tend  at  first 
and  for  a  long  time  merely  to  decrease  the  surface  of  the  nucleus  by 
fusion  of  nodes  (Fig.  82B).  Nor  did  Hartmann  (1928)  observe 
decrease  in  size  of  the  nucleus  in  successive  excisions  of  amoeba 
cytoplasm.  Yet  indubitable  decrease  in  nuclear  volume  eventually 
occurs  in  hypernucleated  Stentor  fragments,  as  Prowazek  (1904) 
first  reported.  Stentors  therefore  certainly  tend  by  nuclear  increase 
or  decrease  toward  a  nucleo-cytoplasmic  ratio  of  limited  range. 


A 


Fig.  82.    Size  adaptations  of  macronucleus  in  S.  coeruleus. 

A.  Stentor  with  only  6  nodes,  half  of  which  are  much 
attenuated,  as  if  to  compensate  with  added  surface  and  to  make 
a  typically  disposed  nuclear  chain.  Mouth  was  excised  and  after 
coalescence  during  regeneration  12  nodes  were  formed,  normal 

in  shape,  but  in  forked  arrangement  in  this  case. 

B.  Nucleate  portion  with  14  nodes  is  excised,  regenerates 
proportionate  feeding  organelles  and  reduces  the  number  but 

not  the  size  of  the  nodes. 


Size  of  nuclear  beads  in  the  row  is  generally  quite  uniform,  with 
the  exception  of  interpolated  nodes  which  are,  at  least  initially, 
very  small.  Daughter  cells  have  approximately  the  same  number 


BEHAVIOR    AND    FUNCTIONS    OF    THE    NUCLEUS 


293 


of  nodes  as  mature  animals  but  the  nodes  are  at  first  small  and  all 
presumably  increase  in  size  during  the  interdivisional  period. 
However,  I  have  seen  cultures  of  coeruleus  which  consistently 
produced  animals  with  non-uniform  macronuclear  chains,  some 
nodes  being  too  large  and  others  abnormally  small.  The  lines 
eventually  succumbed. 

There  is  some  evidence  that  the  size  and  number  of  the  nodes 
may  vary  with  the  conditions  under  which  stentors  are  grown.  At 
25  °C  Prowazek  (1904)  found  that  coeruleus  had  fewer  nodes 
(average  of  8)  than  at  i5°C  (12).  Following  the  earlier  work  of 
Allescher  (19 12),  Stolte  (1922)  pursued  this  matter  quite 
thoroughly,  though  with  what  we  would  now  call  a  primitive 
control  of  culture  conditions.  For  instance,  to  subject  stentors  to 
reduced  oxygen  he  simply  grew  them  in  tall  cylinders.  His  results 
indicated  that  cell  size,  macronuclear  volume,  and  nodal  size  are 
complex  variables  which  probably  both  interact  and  are  subject 
to  environmental  influence.  The  results  were  summarized  in  a 
table  from  which  Fig.  83  was  derived.  Rich  food,  abundant 
oxygen,  and  high  temperature  were  correlated  with  a  large  number 
of  smaller  nodes,  and  vice  versa. 


HIGH  TEMPERArUKE 


MUCH 
FOOV 


tlJTL£ 
fOOD 


MUCH  OXYGEN 


large  cell 
many  nodes 
Small  nodes 
large  arri't 

ol  macro n 
rapid  growih 
&  division 


LIT  TLB    OXraEN 


small  cell 
many  nodes 
large  nodes 
rehiivltj  Ig 

cutii.  macron, 
reduced  fission 


VOm  T£MP. 


Small  cell 
lav  nodes 
larye  nodes 
Small  art^t. 

o£  macron. 
vacLLolaie 
div'n .  seldom 


large  cell 
meditun  no. 
0/  nodes 
large  nodes 
med-  Size  macron . 
large  vacuoles 
rapid  division 


large  cell 
/eiv  nodes 
large  nodes 
smaE  arri't. 

of  macron 
large  vacuotes 
div'n.  seldom 


Fig.  83.    Effects  of  environmental  conditions  on  S.  coeruleus, 
according  to  and  adapted  from  a  table  of  Stolte's,  1922. 


6.  Control  of  nuclear  behavior 

Balbiani  (1893)  first  emphasized  that  the  macronucleus  of 
Stentor  does  not  begin  its  major  performance  of  coalescence  until 
the  oral  primordium  is  well  developed  (stage  5)  and  capable  of 


294  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

completing  itself  even  in  the  absence  of  the  nucleus.  This 
chronology  suggests  that  clumping  of  the  nucleus  has  nothing  to 
do  with  primordium  formation ;  and  in  reference  to  fission  (Johnson 
(1893))  it  indicates  that  the  cytostome  leads  the  nucleus  —  rather 
than  the  reverse,  as  in  the  case  of  mitosis  in  cleaving  eggs  and 
dividing  tissue  cells.  We  can  readily  suppose  that  the  primordium 
can  go  through  its  entire  development  in  regeneration  and  reorgani- 
zation without  the  act  of  nuclear  clumping,  and  indeed  this  occurs 
in  experimental  animals  in  which  only  one  bead  is  left.  Again, 
since  the  products  of  artificially  divided  (transected)  stentors 
behave  normally  there  seems  to  be  no  obvious  reason  why  a 
dividing  stentor  could  not  simply  pinch  the  nuclear  chain  in  two 
where  it  originally  lies.  Perhaps  we  may  put  it  this  way,  that  if  the 
macronucleus  is  to  clump,  this  has  to  occur  before  the  cell  divides, 
if  one  daughter  is  not  to  be  left  without  a  nucleus. 

Questions  concerning  control  of  nuclear  behavior  include  the 
following:  What  "tells"  the  nucleus  when  to  fuse?  Is  the  macro- 
nucleus  capable  of  autonomous  division,  or  is  it  merely  pinched  in 
two  by  the  division  furrow?  Does  the  rod-shaped  nucleus  have  to 
be  ''told"  to  renodulate?  Less  anthropomorphically,  does  the 
macronucleus  time  its  own  phases  or  is  it  guided  by  the  cytoplasm, 
and  if  so,  by  what  part  of  the  cytoplasm? 

Weisz  (1951b)  suggested  that  coalescence  of  the  nucleus  is 
stimulated  by  primordium  formation,  for  if  the  early  division 
primordium  is  removed  or  caused  to  be  resorbed  there  is  no  division 
and  no  compacting  of  the  nucleus.  Yet  the  division  anlagen  may  be 
removed  at  stage  4  or  even  stage  3  and  fission  can  still  be  completed, 
with  the  nucleus  clumping  normally  just  before  furrow  formation. 
This  implies  either  that  it  is  not  the  primordium  which  gives  the 
stimulus  for  clumping  or  that  the  response  of  the  nucleus  to  this 
stimulus  is  much  delayed. 

Even  if  the  primordium  is  not  implicated,  one  could  still 
maintain  as  Weisz  (1954)  said,  that  ''Evidently,  nuclear  kinetics 
depend  on  direct  stimulus  from  the  ectoplasm".  It  has  already 
been  suggested  that  during  primordium  formation  the  cytoplasm, 
and  perhaps  especially  or  exclusively  the  ectoplasm,  is  in  a  state 
of  activation.  The  ripening  state  of  activation,  or  particularly  when 
this  stage  is  changing  over  to  that  of  inhibition  at  stage  5  or  6, 
could  therefore  provide  the  stimulus  or  the  means  for  coalescence 


BEHAVIOR    AND    FUNCTIONS    OF    THE    NUCLEUS         295 

of  nuclear  nodes.  This  would  explain  Weisz's  (1956)  observation 
that  mid-division  stentors  grafted  to  non-dividers  induce  a 
coalescence  of  the  nuclei  of  both  partners.  Originally  evolved  for 
the  proper  timing  of  nuclear  clumping  in  division,  this  relationship 
between  cytoplasmic  and  nuclear  states  would  also  be  effective  in 
producing  a  usually  superfluous  clumping  during  reorganization 
and  regeneration  because  the  state  of  activation  always  accom- 
panies primordium  formation.  On  this  hypothesis  the  nucleus 
would  fail  to  clump  in  dividers  from  which  early-stage  primordia 
were  excised  or  caused  to  resorb,  not  because  the  primordium  is 
missing  as  a  stimulus  to  coalescence,  but  because  the  cytoplasm 
again  came  under  the  inhibitive  dominance  of  the  intact  feeding 
organelles  and  the  state  of  activation  was  aboHshed. 

How,  then,  is  the  nucleus  guided  in  elongating  and  renodulating? 
Does  it  divide  autonomously?  These  problems  have  engaged  the 
attention  of  Noel  de  Terra  (1959)  whose  preliminary  findings 
she  kindly  communicated.  Apparently  the  cytoplasm  gives  the  cue 
for  elongation  of  the  clumped  nucleus,  for  if  the  compacted  nucleus 
of  a  divider  was  transferred  to  an  interphase  stentor  no  elongation 
occurred.  But  if  the  condensed  nucleus  was  transferred  to  a  cell 
with  nucleus  in  the  same  condition,  then  the  two  nuclei  elongated 
together  synchronously.  Supportive  are  experiments  already 
described,  indicating  that  if  the  nucleus  is  prevented  from  renodu- 
lating at  the  close  of  division  because  of  injuries  suffered  during  its 
compacted  stage,  then  it  remains  as  a  rod  in  the  interphase  cell  and 
does  not  nodulate  until  the  animal  passes  through  another  episode 
of  activation  or  redifferentiation  (see  Fig.  80c). 

De  Terra  is  also  finding  evidence  that  the  macronucleus  in 
Stentor  is  generally  incapable  of  autonomous  division  and  therefore 
has  to  be  pinched  in  two  at  the  rod  stage  by  the  division  furrow, 
though  autonomous  division  of  macronuclear  anlagen  occurs  during 
conjugation.  This  correlates  with  the  cytological  picture  when 
separation  of  daughter  cells  is  prevented  by  injury  to  late  dividers, 
the  compacted  nucleus  elongating  and  renodulating  as  a  single 
chain  instead  of  two.  When  she  caused  stentors  to  divide  very 
unequally,  the  macronucleus  was  also  unequally  and  propor- 
tionately distributed  to  the  daughter  products,  quite  as  if  the 
furrow  cuts  through  the  rod  nucleus  wherever  it  happens  to  strike. 
Likewise,  when  the  clumped  nucleus  of  a  reorganizer,  not  normally 


296  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

dividing,  was  used  to  replace  that  of  a  divider  it  was  divided  with 
the  cell. 

These  findings  indicate  that  the  cytoplasm  as  a  whole,  or  its 
state  of  activation-inhibition  with  reference  to  primordium  forma- 
tion, seems  to  be  involved  in  guiding  the  nucleus  in  its  behavior. 
Thus,  in  some  of  my  own  unpublished  studies  reorganizers  or 
dividers  were  cut  in  two  longitudinally  before  the  nucleus  had 


Fig.  84.  Behavior  of  the  macronucleus  of  ^S.  coeruleus  in  absence 
of  the  oral  primordium. 

A.  a:  Stage-2  reorganizer  cut  in  two  longitudinally,  b: 
Non-oral  half  retains  nucleus  in  nodulated  state  while  that  of 
oral  half  clumps  as  reorganization  proceeds  to  stage  5.  c:  But 
the  non-oral  half  soon  shows  a  tardy  coalescence  of  nodes  and 
then  renodulates  along  with  the  partner  half  (d).  e:  Fragment 
without  mouthparts  forms  regeneration  primordium  10 1  hours 

later  with  nodes  again  fusing. 

B.  Macronucleus  renodulates  in  longitudinal  half  of  a  divider 
without  the  primordium,   regenerating  later.     Stage-6  anlage 

completes  development  without  nucleus. 

C.  Nodes  coalesce  and  renodulate  in  half  without  primordium, 

while  mouthparts  rejoin  membranellar  band. 


BEHAVIOR    AND    FUNCTIONS    OF    THE    NUCLEUS         297 

coalesced,  and  the  nodes  in  the  right-hand  fragment  without  the 
primordium  nevertheless  fused  simultaneously  with  those  of  the 
other  fragment  which  carried  the  developing  anlagen.  Similarly, 
if  stage-6  dividers  were  cut  in  the  same  way  so  that  the  clumped 
nucleus  remained  in  the  fragment  without  the  primordium,  the 
nucleus  then  extended  and  renodulated  on  time  (Fig.  84).  Such 
observations  suggest  that  the  nucleus  is  guided  in  its  behavior  by 
something  which  characterizes  the  whole  cell  rather  than  by 
stimuli  emanating  exclusively  from  the  primordium. 

7.  Necessity  of  the  nucleus  for  oral  redifferentiation 

No  experiment  demonstrates  more  dramatically  the  fundamental 
duality  of  the  cell  than  the  failure  of  Stentor  and  other  ciliates  to 
regenerate  or  survive  without  the  nucleus.  The  nucleus  cannot 
regenerate  a  cytoplasm  around  it  and  is  indeed  so  dependent  upon 
its  cytoplasmic  environment  that  naked  nuclei  soon  degenerate 
and  cannot  viably  be  returned  to  the  cell.  Likewise  cytoplasm 
alone  can  never  produce  a  nucleus.  Specifically  in  regard  to  Stentor, 
our  starting  point  in  the  study  of  nucleo-cytoplasmic  interactions 
is  that  oral  regeneration  or  the  formation  and  development  of  a 
primordium  is  a  cooperative  effort  of  nucleus  and  cytoplasm  and 
does  not  occur  in  the  absence  of  some  portion  of  the  macronucleus. 

Yet  the  nucleus  does  not  make  the  primordium  in  the  sense  of  a 
handicraft  but  remains  visibly  unchanged  while  the  anlage  is 
elaborated  at  some  distance  from  it.  Hence  there  should  be  some 
intermediate  step  through  which  the  nucleus  contributes  to  the 
support  of  primordium  formation  in  the  cytoplasm.  This  inter- 
mediary would  be  truly  essential  to  redifferentiation ;  the  presence 
of  the  nucleus  only  indirectly  as  its  source.  Such  a  relationship  is 
evident  in  the  amazing  case  of  the  unicellular  plant  Acetahularia 
(see  Hammerling,  1953)  in  which  both  growth  and  the  elaboration 
of  specific  organelles  continues  long  after  enucleation,  in  a  way 
that  can  best  be  explained  by  supposing  that  the  nuclear  contribu- 
tion is  a  durable  substance  which  persists,  quantitatively,  in  the 
cytoplasm  until  exhausted. 

If  the  action  of  the  nucleus  is  indirect  and  mediated  through 
products  which  it  contributes  to  the  cytoplasm,  there  should  also 
be  some  evidence  of  this  lag-effect  in  Stentor.  Using  coeruleus  as 
the  test  organism,   I   have  found  (unpublished)  that  the  oral 


298  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

primordium  can  generally  continue  one  or  two  stages  further  in  its 
development  after  enucleation.  Stage-2  primordia  could  continue 
to  stage  4,  and  stage-4  anlagen  to  stage  6,  etc.  After  going  one  or 
two  steps  further,  early  primordia  through  stage  4  were  then 
resorbed.  In  incipient  regenerators,  enucleated,  the  primordium 
could  put  in  its  initial  appearance  and  then  disappear,  i.e.,  develop- 
ment was  possible  from  stage  o  to  stage  i.  Animals  with  stage-6 
anlagen,  or  even  at  stage  5  when  there  is  still  no  sign  of  a  gullet  and 
oral  pouch,  were  able  to  complete  oral  differentiation  and  move 
the  new  structures  into  their  definitive  position  (see  Fig.  8ob). 
These  performances  are  explainable  on  the  assumptions,  first,  that 
there  is  a  nuclear  contribution  to  cytoplasmic  differentiation  which 
does  persist  for  a  short  while  or  is  present  in  small  quantity  at  any 
one  time;  and  second,  that  by  stage  5  the  anlage  has  completed 
most  of  its  synthesis  of  new  material  in  the  form  of  oral  cilia,  etc., 
and  needs  only  to  invaginate  and  shift  the  parts  already  formed  to 
complete  the  elaboration  of  the  feeding  organelles. 

Formation  of  the  fission  furrow  after  enucleation  of  mid-stage 
dividers  demonstrates  its  independence  from  the  presence  of  the 
nucleus. 

The  experiments  on  stentors  with  late-stage  anlagen  clearly 
confirm  many  earlier  observations  on  the  completion  of  regenera- 
tion and  division  of  stentors  in  the  absence  of  the  nucleus,  begin- 
ning with  Gruber  (1883,  1885a,  b).  He  was  much  impressed  by 
the  continued  normal  behavior  of  enucleated  ActinophrySj  a 
heliozoan,  and  of  Stentor.  For  the  former,  he  claimed  "  regenera- 
tion" (however  this  may  be  manifest  in  a  rhizopod)  in  the  absence 
of  the  nucleus,  but  requiring  cytoplasmic  chromatin  of  nuclear 
origin.  In  S.  coeruleus  he  found  that  cells,  after  removal  of  the 
compacted  macronucleus,  could  complete  division  with  separation 
of  daughters  and  full  development  of  the  primordium  in  the 
opisthe.  He  therefore  supposed  that  enucleated  stentors  might 
regenerate  "under  conditions  not  yet  devised".  This  remark  is 
not  very  different  from  Morgan's  (1901a)  conjecture  that,  if  the 
nuclear  contribution  could  be  supplied  in  some  other  way,  then 
the  presence  of  the  nucleus  as  such  should  not  be  necessary  for 
regeneration  in  stentors.  I  therefore  feel  that  Gruber  has  been 
somewhat  maligned  in  reviews  of  this  subject  as  saying  that  the 
nucleus  is  not  necessary  for  regeneration  and  having  to  correct 


BEHAVIOR    AND    FUNCTIONS    OF    THE    NUCLEUS         299 

this  assertion  later.  Both  Gruber  and  Morgan  were  pointing  to  the 
high  probabihty  that  the  action  of  the  nucleus  is  indirect  and  that 
what  is  crucial  is  not  the  physical  presence  of  the  nucleus  but  of 
something  it  produces. 

Prowazek  (1904)  made  more  of  a  case  for  regeneration  in 
Stentor  without  the  nucleus,  though  he  too  regarded  nuclear 
derivatives  as  indispensable.  That  enucleated  dividing  stentors  can 
complete  fission  and  oral  differentiation  of  the  posterior  daughters, 
he  also  observed.  In  addition,  he  reported  that  elevated  tempera- 
tures in  *'  warm  cultures  "  could  supply  the  conditions  for  regenera- 
tion without  the  nucleus.  Yet  he  cited  only  one  case  and  he  did 
not  claim  that  the  oral  differentiation  was  complete.  Ishikawa 
(19 1 2)  thought  he  confirmed  this  result  in  Stentor  "  in  some  cases  ". 
Sokoloff  (1924)  made  similar  experiments  on  Bursar ia  truncatella 
in  w^arm  culture  and  reported  that  eight  out  of  thirty  enucleated 
animals  regenerated  the  feeding  organelles  and  were  able  to  ingest 
normally;  but  Schmahl  (1926)  denied  this,  though  he  did  not  say 
specifically  that  he  tried  high  temperatures.  Returning  to 
Prowazek's  studies,  his  strongest  statement  was  that  if  stentors 
are  cut  and  recut  so  that  they  are  repeatedly  compelled  to 
regenerate,  then  in  a  few  cases  (3)  oral  regeneration  could  occur 
in  enucleate  pieces,  and  he  did  not  say  that  the  regeneration  was 
incomplete.  Regeneration  in  the  absence  of  the  nucleus,  whether 
in  warm  cultures  or  by  repeated  cutting,  he  explained  as  due  to 
the  presence  of  chromidia,  substituting  for  the  nucleus.  Before  w^e 
smile  at  this,  we  should  remember  that  just  as  the  Feulgen  staining 
anticipated  the  modern  DNA  doctrine,  so  the  old  chromidial 
hypothesis  is  a  sort  of  pre-vision  of  the  RNA  story  which  is 
developing  today;  and  Prowazek's  exploratory  study  may  contain 
the  germ  of  new  techniques. 

8.  Reconstitution  of  shape  in  relation  to  the  nucleus 

Though  stentors  cannot  redifferentiate  oral  structures  without 
the  nucleus  or  its  products,  may  they  not  at  least  recover  their 
normal  form  after  injuries?  Cutting  operations  usually  have  two 
effects:  the  symmetrical,  conical  shape  of  a  stentor  is  distorted, 
and  the  lateral  striping  if  not  the  membranellar  band  is  disturbed 
and  misaUgned.  Cutting  also  produces  a  wound,  with  exposure  of 
the  endoplasm,  and  we  can  assert  categorically  that  all  investigators 


300  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

have  found  that  heaHng  is  prompt  and  to  all  appearances  as  good 
in  enucleates  as  in  nucleated  stentors. 

In  regard  to  shape  recovery,  Balbiani  (1891c)  had  observed  that 
enucleate  aboral  longitudinal  halves  which  folded  on  themselves 
retained  the  abnormal  shape;  nucleates  recovered.  From  less 
drastic  distortions,  Prowazek  (1904,  1913)  and  Schwartz  (1935) 
reported  that  enucleates  are  capable  of  rather  extensive  reconstitu- 
tion  of  the  normal  axis  and  conical  form.  This  was  my  experience 
also  (Tartar,  1956c)  and  can  be  explained  as  merely  the  shifting 
in  position  of  parts  already  present  without  requiring  new 
syntheses.  Schwartz  observed  little  or  no  reahgnment  of  the  striping 
of  the  ectoplasm,  however,  and  made  the  point  that,  since  these 
adjustments  are  gradual,  the  enucleated  cell  dies  before  they  can 
be  completed.  I  have  found  that  separate  or  separated  membra- 


F1G.85.      Activities    during    survival    of    enucleated    (minus 
macronucleus)  S.  coeruleus. 

A.  Mass  of  2  enucleate  stentors  minced  and  mouthparts 
removed.  Sections  of  membranellar  bands  come  together  and 
join  and  there  is  considerable  mending  and  alignment  of  stripe 

areas.    Specimen  lived  5  days. 

B.  Stage-4  reorganizer  enucleated.  By  day  2  of  the  experi- 
ment the  anlage  had  lengthened  but  there  was  no  stomatogenesis 
and  original  mouthparts  were  resorbed.  By  day  3  specimen  was 
about  half  original  volume,  indicating  utilization  of  its  substance 
during  starvation.  Considerable  fading  of  coloration  occurs.  On 
day  4  lateral  striping  is  present  but  only  a  few  membranellar  cilia 
remain.   Day  6 :  glistening  sphere  without  body  or  oral  cilia  but 

with  vestiges  of  striping,  found  dead  on  day  7. 


BEHAVIOR    AND    FUNCTIONS    OF    THE    NUCLEUS         3OI 

nellar  bands  can  unite,  oral  parts  may  migrate  together,  and  that 
there  is  a  fair  amount  of  reorienting  and  mending  of  stripe  patches 
in  minced  stentors  in  the  absence  of  the  nucleus  (Fig.  85A).  Yet 
we  still  need  clear-cut  tests  and  a  precise  definition  of  capabilities 
for  shape  and  form  reconstitution  in  enucleated  stentors. 


9.  Functioning  and  re-formation  of  vacuole  and  holdfast 

in  enucleates 

Balbiani  (1889)  found  that  the  contractile  vacuole  of  Stentor 
functions  without  the  presence  of  the  nucleus.  Its  rate  of  pulsation 
is  even  normal  (Prowazek,  1904),  as  is  the  case  in  Amoeba 
(Comandon  and  de  Fonbrune,  1939b).  A  new  contractile  vacuole 
appeared  in  enucleated  posterior  pieces  of  igneus  (Balbiani,  1893) 
and  this  was  confirmed  in  coeruleus  by  Stevens  (1903),  Schwartz 
(1935)  and  Tartar  (1956c).  The  same  has  been  known  for  Amoeba 
since  the  work  of  Hofer  (1890).  As  Balbiani  remarked,  the  new 
vacuole  probably  does  not  involve  structural  synthesis  and  may 
arise  merely  by  the  enlargement  of  some  feeding  canal  of  the 
existing  contractile  vacuole  system.  This  is  the  more  probable 
since  Schwartz  observed  new  pulsating  vacuoles  in  enucleated 
stentors  3  minutes  after  the  older  ones  had  been  removed. 

In  enucleated  stentors  the  old  holdfast  is  quite  capable  of 
functioning  in  reattachment  (Stevens,  1903).  It  can  also  be 
re-formed  in  the  absence  of  the  nucleus,  as  attested  by  firm 
reattachment  by  a  holdfast  of  coeruleus  from  which  both  tail-pole 
and  nucleus  have  been  removed  (Tartar,  1956c).  This  regeneration 
is  understandable  on  the  basis  that  Httle  if  any  synthesis  is  involved, 
only  a  modification  of  existing  parts. 

10.  Behavior  of  enucleates 

First  let  us  note  that  Schwartz  (1935)  observed  vigorous  cyclosis 
of  the  endoplasm  which  continued  nearly  up  to  the  point  of  death 
in  enucleated  coeruleus.  In  regard  to  the  *'  external"  behavior, 
investigators  were  impressed  from  the  start  by  the  sustained 
activity  and  normal  swimming  behavior  of  enucleated  ciliates. 
Similarly,  it  is  well  known  that  amcebas  can  continue  forming 
pseudopods  in  the  absence  of  the  nucleus.  But  in  Stentor  the 
vigorous  beating  of  thousands  of  body  cilia  and  numerous  huge 


302  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

membranelles  can  continue  for  about  one  week  and  is  dramatic 
evidence  of  the  extent  of  energy  metabolism  which  continues  in 
the  absence  of  the  nucleus.  Very  likely  this  is  to  be  explained  by 
the  presence  of  mitochondria  or  specialized  ectoplasmic  granules 
as  relatively  independent  centers  of  oxidative  phosphorylation. 
Normal  avoiding  responses  and  searching  behavior  seem  to  be 
shown  by  enucleates;  therefore,  to  repeat  an  apercu  of  doubtful 
brilliance,  the  nucleus  is  not  a  brain.  As  the  proof  of  the  pudding 
is  in  the  eating,  so  a  test  of  effective  behavior  lies  in  the  feeding. 
Prowazek  (1904)  found  that  enucleated  coeruleus  could  ingest 
chlorellae  and  Schwartz  (1935)  showed  that  some  would  take  up 
Colpidia.  Hence  the  general  impression,  which  corresponds  to  my 
own  observations,  is  oddly  indecisive:  enucleated  stentors  with 
intact  feeding  organelles  can  ingest  food  but,  like  enucleated 
amoebas  (Brachet,  1955),  usually  do  not.  As  a  rule  enucleates  feed 
little  and  soon  become  transparent  as  they  void  the  food  vacuoles 
which  were  present  in  them  originally;  for,  though  incapable  of 
further  digestion,  they  are  quite  capable  of  normal  defecation 
(Balbiani,  1889;  Prowazek,  1904;  and  Schwartz,  1935).  I  have 
found  that  the  presence  of  but  one  macronuclear  node  was 
sufficient  to  cause  stentors  to  gorge  themselves  in  the  presence  of 
abundant  food. 

II.  Digestion  in  enucleates 

Using  vital  dyes  as  indicators,  Balbiani  (1893)  found  that  food 
vacuoles  do  not  become  acidic  in  enucleates  as  they  do  in  normal 
stentors,  and  in  this  he  confirmed  the  work  of  Hofer  in  1890  on 
amoebas.  Schwartz  (1935)  followed  the  fate  of  Colpidia  which  were 
ingested  by  some  of  his  enucleate  coeruleus.  Digestion  was  never 
complete.  From  the  start  the  food  vacuoles  were  abnormally 
swollen.  Staining  showed  no  dissolution  of  the  ingested  ciliates, 
as  occurred  in  controls.  In  one  case  I  noticed  that  a  motionless 
rotifer  in  a  food  vacuole  within  an  enucleated  stentor  remained 
without  apparent  change  for  4  days,  although  rotifers  are  normal 
food  of  stentors.  Hence  it  is  very  probable  that  the  macronucleus 
is  necessary  for  digestion  and  hence  for  growth  of  the  cell. 

Though  apparently  incapable  of  digestion,  enucleated  coeruleus 
were  able  to  utilize  or  cause  the  disappearance  of  their  granular 
carbohydrate  reserves,  though  possibly  at  a  slower  rate  than  in 


BEHAVIOR    AND    FUNCTIONS    OF    THE    NUCLEUS         303 

normal  starving  animals  (Tartar,  1956c).  This  corresponds  to 
Brachet's  (1955)  results  with  Amoeba  * 

Allied  to  the  problem  of  digestion  is  the  matter  of  autolysis  or 
''  self -digestion  "  or  the  capacity  of  enucleated  ciliates  to  dedifferen- 
tiate and  resorb  existing  ectoplasmic  structures.  As  is  too  often 
disturbingly  the  case,  some  say  they  do  and  others  say  they  don't. 
In  Frofttonia,  Balbiani  (1889)  observed  the  disappearance  of  tri- 
chocysts  and  much  of  the  ciliation  in  enucleates  and  he  thought 
this  might  be  an  autodigestion  of  proteins.  Schmahl  (1926)  said  that 
membranelles  are  resorbed  in  enucleated  Bursaria;  but  he 
remarked  that  Dembowska  found  no  resorption  of  parts  in 
Stylonychia  after  enucleation.  Specifically  in  regard  to  Stentor 
coeruleus,  we  have  already  noted  that  early  primordia  are  resorbed 
when  the  nucleus  is  removed,  but  the  situation  is  quite  different 
in  respect  to  already  formed  structures. 

Weisz  (1949c)  claimed  that  enucleation  produces  prompt 
dedifferentiation  of  existing  feeding  organelles  and  holdfast  within 
24  hours.  He  therefore  believed  that  the  nucleus  is  necessary  not 
only  for  the  production  of  new  parts  but  equally  for  the  main- 
tenance of  structures  already  formed.  My  experience  has  been  to 
the  contrary  (Tartar,  1953).  I  obtained  no  impression  that  the 
feeding  organelles  soon  disappear  upon  withdrawal  of  nuclear 
''support".  Most  frequently  animals  died  with  these  organelles 
intact  or,  at  most,  a  bit  vague.  Only  when  survival  of  enucleates 
was  most  protracted  did  extensive  dedifferentiation  finally  occur 
(Fig.  85B),  but  since  dedifferentiation  was  then  so  tardy  it  was 
probably  the  result  rather  of  general  necrosis.  In  the  present 
context  it  is  significant  that  in  the  experiments  in  which  the  heads, 
only,  of  stentors  were  excised,  proportionality  of  parts,  which 
undoubtedly   involved   resorption   of  considerable   part   of  the 

*Regarding  transport  mechanisms  in  the  cell,  de  Terra  (i960)  found 
in  S.  coeruleus  that  during  the  later  stages  of  division,  after  the  macro- 
nucleus  has  condensed,  uptake  of  phosphate  as  tested  by  radio-active 
phosphorus  32  is  greatly  reduced.  This  reduction  occurred  both  in 
nucleate  and  enucleated  animals.  Return  to  high  uptake  after  division  was 
found  only  in  cells  with  the  macronucleus.  Hence  by  inference  this  nucleus 
is  chemically  inactive  during  late  fission  (which  therefore  does  not  require 
the  nucleus  for  completion),  or  at  least  the  macronucleus  is  required  for 
restoration  of  high  phosphate  uptake  characteristic  of  the  interdivisional 
period. 


304  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

original  membranellar  band,  occurred  only  if  nuclear  beads  were 
present  (Tartar,  i959d). 

12.  Survival  of  enucleates 

Gruber,  Balbiani,  Prowazek,  and  Schwartz  reported  survival 
times  of  from  32  hours  to  3  days.  Demonstrating  his  main  theme, 
Schwartz  (1935)  found  that  survival  of  coeruleus  in  which  the 
macronucleus  has  been  removed  was  not  aided  or  extended  by  the 
presence  of  i  to  16  micronuclei,  again  proving  the  indifferent 
character  of  these  tiny  nuclei  with  respect  to  vegetative  functions. 
His  enucleates  lived  for  a  much  shorter  period  than  starved  controls 
which  remained  alive  for  a  week.  Therefore  he  concluded  that 
death  was  not  due  to  starvation  but  to  some  disturbance  of  the 
entire  metabolism  in  the  absence  of  the  macronucleus. 

I  have  found  that  the  tiniest  blebs  of  ciliated  cytoplasm  separated 
off  in  abnormal  division  of  coeruleus  can  live  for  a  little  more  than 
5  hours.  Larger  enucleated  fragments  lived  for  about  3  to  4  days, 
and  the  largest  enucleates  generally  lived  for  4  days  when  isolated 
in  depression  slides,  though  some  survived  for  6.  It  is  not  uncom- 
mon to  find  enucleated  stentors  living  as  long  as  starved  controls 
(Tartar,  1956c).  One  wonders,  then,  whether  enucleates  may  not 
die  merely  from  exhaustion  of  reserves  rather  than  disturbed 
metabolism. 

13.  Consequences  of  excess  nucleus 

Stentor  fragments  and  fusion  complexes  with  an  unusually  high 
proportion  of  macronuclear  material  in  relation  to  the  cytoplasmic 
volume  can  be  produced  by  cutting  all  the  nucleus  into  one  small 
fragment,  forcing  all  the  nucleus  at  division  into  one  daughter  cell, 
or  grafting  together  sectors  of  several  cells  bearing  most  of  their 
nuclei.  Effects  of  this  artificial  alteration  of  the  nucleo-cytoplasmic 
ratio  in  favor  of  the  nucleus  can  be  followed  because,  though  neat 
studies  of  nuclear  volume  would  be  difficult  and  are  lacking,  there 
is  no  evidence  or  impression  that  excess  nuclear  material  is  quickly 
and  adaptively  resorbed  in  any  way  comparable  to  the  speed  with 
which  the  macronuclear  chain  is  regenerated  after  all  but  a  few 
nodes  are  removed.  This  statement  corresponds  closely  to  the 
observations  of  Schwartz  (1935). 

Both  Prowazek  (1904)  and  Causin  (1931)  noted  that  coeruleus 


BEHAVIOR    AND    FUNCTIONS    OF    THE    NUCLEUS        305 

fragments  with  too  much  nucleus  had  difficuhy  in  regenerating 
and  surviving  and  soon  died,  while  Sokoloff  (1924)  found  that 
Bursaria  fragments  of  the  same  sort  did  not  regenerate.  Weisz 
(1948a),  on  the  contrary,  denied  that  excess  nucleus  was  injurious. 
The  staunchest  advocate  of  the  importance  of  the  nucleo- 
cytoplasmic  ratio  in  protozoa  was  Popoif  (1909).  But  we  have  to 
doubt,  as  an  expression  of  over-exuberance  for  this  idea,  the  report 
that  he  produced  dwarf  lines  of  coeruleus  from  small  fragments  of 
normal  ratio,  and  note  that  his  hopes  for  producing  giant  races  of 
stentors  by  the  same  principle  were  not  fulfilled.  In  fact,  Burnside 
(1929)  clearly  demonstrated  that  Stentor  fragments  grow  back  to 
the  normal  size  before  they  divide,  and  this  was  fully  confirmed 
by  Weisz  (1948c).  Yet  PopoflF  made  a  summary  statement  which 
is  probably  valid :  namely,  that  too  much  nucleus  is  not  as  injurious 
as  too  little  but  is  not  without  its  eflFect.  This  remark  is  in  part 
substantiated  in  the  following  section.  In  the  present  connection, 
my  experience  has  been  that  hypernucleate  fragments  of  coeruleus 
often  die  prematurely  or  are  notably  tardy  in  regeneration  (Tartar, 
i959g)  but  this  matter  needs  much  more  study  (Fig.  86a). 
Comandon  and  de  Fonbrune  (1939b)  found  that  uninucleate 
species  of  Amoeba  carrying  3  nuclei  by  transplantation  did  not 
divide  though  followed  2  months,  but  binucleates  could  divide. 

14.  Consequences  of  reduced  nucleus 

All  but  one  macronuclear  node  can  be  removed  from  stentors 
and  the  nucleo-cytoplasmic  ratio  can  be  still  further  shifted  in 
favor  of  the  cytoplasm  by  grafting  such  an  animal  to  one  or  more 
completely  enucleated  stentors.  A  combination  of  excisions  and 
graftings  therefore  makes  it  possible  in  Stentor  to  produce  truly 
extraordinary  shifts  in  the  relative  volumes  of  cytoplasm  and 
nucleus;  and  there  is  time  to  test  the  consequences  because 
compensatory  growth  of  the  nucleus  occurs  only  later  during 
periods  of  oral  primordium  formation  (Fig.  86c). 

These  methods  were  not  available  to  earlier  workers  whose  cut 
fragments  yielded  disturbance  of  the  normal  nucleo-plasmic  ratio 
in  narrow^er  range  and  gave  no  eflFect.  Balbiani,  for  example,  said 
repeatedly  (1889,  1891c,  1893)  in  reference  to  Stentor  and  other 
ciliates  that  the  relative  size  of  the  nucleus  is  indiflFerent  for  the 
formative  processes  of  regeneration.  This  was  also  the  conclusion 


306  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

of  Weisz  (1948a,  1954).  I  have  found,  however  (Tartar,  1953, 
i959g),  that  in  whole  cells  with  only  one  node,  appearance  of  the 
regeneration  primordium  is  very  much  delayed,  substantiating  an 
early  remark  of  Popoff  (1909)  regarding  slowness  of  regeneration 
in  animals  with  a  decreased  nucleo-cytoplasmic  ratio.  In  grafts  of 
two  animals  carrying  only  one  node  the  delay  was  greater ;  primor- 
dium formation  occurred  only  after  two  days,  with  development 


Fig.  86.  Effects  of  marked  shifts  in  the  nucleo-cytoplasmic  ratio. 
A.  Indication  of  disturbance  in  hypernucleates.  a:  Fragment 
containing  all  the  macronucleus  (20  nodes)  of  a  coeruleiis  did  not 
regenerate  until  one  day  later  and  then  astomatously  {b).  c:  By 
day  3,  successful  re-regeneration  had  occurred  and  specimen 
still  had  17  to  20  nodes,  d:  Next  day  there  were  10  oval  or 
doublish  nodes  indicating  fusion  and  reduction  of  surface,  e: 
Specimen  became  sickly  and  died  on  day  5,  a  day  earlier  than 
demise  of  the  enucleate  cell  remainder. 


BEHAVIOR    AND    FUNCTIONS    OF    THE    NUCLEUS         307 

of  the  anlage  proceeding  slowly.  In  any  case  the  single  node  was 
able  to  support  regeneration  eventually,  for  increases  in  the  nucleus 
occurred  only  afterward  (Fig.  86b).  Occasionally  no  regeneration 
occurred  at  all,  although  the  single  macronuclear  node  persisted 
intact  until  death  of  the  specimen.  Therefore  extreme  reductions 
show  that  the  nucleo-cytoplasmic  ratio  does  have  an  important 
effect  at  least  on  the  time  required  for  oral  regeneration. 

An  interesting  question  is  posed  by  what  happens  to  the  single 
node  which  enables  it  to  support  primordium  formation  even  in 
a  large  mass  of  cytoplasm.  For  if  all  but  one  nuclear  bead  is  removed 
from  a  stentor  in  process  of  regeneration,  I  found  that  early 
primordia  were  then  resorbed,  though  later  anlagen  could  run 
their  course  of  development  with  the  support  of  the  single  remain- 
ing node  (unpublished).  In  a  stentor  with  15  nodes  each  may  carry 
only  I /15th  of  the  burden  of  supporting  primordium  formation 
and  development.  For  one  node  to  do  so,  especially  within  a  large 
mass  of  cytoplasm,  may  require  an  adaptation  in  which  the  output 
of  this  single  node  becomes  greatly  accelerated. 

There  is  some  evidence  that  in  stentors  with  greatly  reduced 
nuclear  complement  the  general  metabolism  of  the  cell  may  be 
upset  until  this  disparity  is  redressed.  The  first  hint  of  such  effects 

B.  Delayed  primordium  formation  in  hypernucleates.  a: 
When  a  sector  with  stage-2  regeneration  anlage  and  one  macro- 
nuclear  node  was  grafted  to  non- differentiating  stentor  minus 
nucleus  and  mouthparts  the  primordium  was  promptly  resorbed 
and  no  regeneration  occurred  until  3  days  later.  No  nuclear 
increase  occurs  until  after  anlage  passes  through  stage  6.  b:  A 
fusion  mass  of  2  stentors  coerideus  with  mouthparts  and  all  but  2 
nodes  excised  did  not  regenerate  until  two  days  later,  the  2  nodes 
increasing  to  7  only  as  the  anlagen  completed  development. 

C.  Regeneration  of  the  macronuclear  chain  and  reconstitution 
of  proportionate  parts,  a:  One  macronuclear  node  in  head 
folded  on  itself,  b:  Shape  regenerated  and  feeding  organelles 
reduced  to  proportionate  size  without  primordium  formation, 
single  node  now  spindle  form  (to  increase  its  active  surface 
area?);  reorganization  primordium  (to  make  possible  nuclear 
increase?),  c:  After  reorganization  the  specimen  has  9  small 
nodes,  d:  Membranellar  band  and  frontal  field,  again  made 
relatively  too  large  through  reorganization,  are  adaptively 
decreased  in  size,   e:  Before  its  demise,  the  animal  had  7  nodes 

(adaptation  to  decreasing  size  in  starvation  on  the  slide?). 


3o8  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

is  to  be  found  in  the  work  of  Popoff  (1909)  who  concluded  from 
his  observations  of  coeruleus  that  stentors  with  too  little  nucleus 
are  sickly  and  in  many  respects  like  enucleates.  Schwartz  (1935) 
was  even  stronger  in  his  statement  that  digestion  and  even  ''the 
entire  metabolism"  is  greatly  disturbed  through  removal  of  most 
of  the  macronucleus. 

Although  the  old  concept  of  nucleo-cytoplasmic  ratio  may  not 
have  fulfilled  the  original  hopes  that  were  invested  in  it,  it  is  likely 
that  the  extreme  variations  in  this  ratio  which  can  be  produced  in 
Stentor  will  have  an  important  bearing  in  newer  studies  of  respira- 
tion, synthesis,  and  enzyme  production  in  single  cells. 


Fig.  87.    Critical  time  for  recovery  after  renucleation. 

Macronucleus  was  excised  from  specimens  on  morning  of 
day  I.  If  renucleated  on  day  4  complete  regeneration  of  feeding 
organelles  and  of  nuclear  chain  occurred,  with  continued 
survival.  Renucleated  on  day  5,  pale  and  murky  stentor  becomes 
healthier,  regenerates  faded  pigmentation,  and  forms  primor- 
dium  which  does  not  produce  mouthparts.  Specimen  was  dead 
on  day  10.  Renucleation  on  day  6,  the  faded,  murky  specimen 
became  healthier  in  appearance  and  darker  in  color  but  died  the 
next  day  without  forming  an  oral  anlage.  Fifth  day  therefore 
seems  to  be  transition  period  for  recoverability  of  the  cytoplasm. 


BEHAVIOR    AND    FUNCTIONS    OF    THE    NUCLEUS         309 

15.  Delayed  renucleation 

Since  Verworn  (1892),  it  has  been  found  in  Amoeba  and  its 
relatives  that  the  naked  nucleus  undergoes  immediate  degeneration 
in  the  absence  of  its  normal  cytoplasmic  environment  and  is  not 
viable  when  reimplanted  (Comandon  and  de  Fonbrune,  1939b; 
Lorch  and  Danielli,  1953).  So  it  is  with  Stentor  and  with 
embryonic  cells  (Briggs  and  King,  1955).  Cytoplasm  in  the 
absence  of  the  nucleus  shows  a  very  much  slower  deterioration. 
This  raises  the  question:  Beyond  what  period  of  time  is  the 
cytoplasm  irreversibly  deteriorated  so  that  it  can  no  longer  recover 
after  reimplantation  of  a  fresh  nucleus?  We  would  like  to  be  able 
to  analyse  what  goes  wrong  in  enucleated  cells  and  what  the 
nucleus  contributes  to  the  maintenance  of  the  cytoplasm.  This 
approach  might  be  especially  fruitful  if  renucleations  were  made 
at  a  time  when  certain  cytoplasmic  functions  were  recoverable 
and  others  not. 

Amoebas  can  recover  normal  activity  and  even  divide  if 
renucleated  2  days  after  enucleation  (Comandon  and  de  Fonbrune, 
1939b;  Lorch  and  DanielH,  1953);  but  the  French  workers  found 
that  practically  no  recovery  occurred  when  renucleation  was 
delayed  to  the  sixth  day.  I  have  a  few  experiments  of  this  type  on 
Stentor  coeruleus  (unpublished).  Animals  renucleated  on  days  3  and 

4  of  the  experiment,  or  2  and  3  days  following  enucleation,  could 
recover  completely,  regenerate  the  mouthparts,  show  increase  in 
the  number  of  nuclear  nodes  following  regeneration,  and  divide. 
Very  likely  they  would  have  developed  into  clones  if  the  difficulties 
of  culturing  had  been  surmounted.  A  specimen  renucleated  on 
day  6  promptly  corrected  its  faded  coloration  and  necrotic  turbidity 
of  the  endoplasm,  but  was  not  able  to  regenerate.  Another, 
renucleated  on  day  5  recovered  and  regenerated  incompletely,  for 
although  the  new  membranellar  band  was  normal  the  mouthparts 
consisted  only  of  a  short  tube  (Fig.  87).  This  animal  survived 

5  more  days  on  the  slide.  Apropos  of  the  remarks  above,  the 
specimen  lost  its  contractility  completely  and  could  be  cut  into 
without  showing  the  slightest  twich,  as  if  the  myonemes  had 
suffered  irreversible  damage  or  loss  of  response.  Evidently  the 
fifth  day  without  the  nucleus  is  critical  for  Stentor  cytoplasm  and 
we  should  have  more  experiments  covering  this  period. 


310  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

All  the  evidence  from  Stentor  points  to  the  generally  accepted 
conclusion  that  the  nucleus  acts  upon  the  cytoplasm  through  the 
intermediation  of  chemical  substances  produced  in  the  nucleus 
and  transmitted  to  the  cytoplasm.  Weisz  (1949a)  has  even  found 
quite  direct  evidence  for  this  transmission :  fixed  specimens  which 
were  undergoing  primordium  development  showed  macronuclear 
vesicles  apparently  breaking  through  the  nuclear  membrane  to 
void  their  contents  into  the  endoplasm.  With  due  allowance  for 
lag  effects,  the  presence  of  a  portion  of  the  macronucleus  is 
necessary  for  oral  regeneration,  digestion  and  synthesis,  and 
survival  of  the  cell.  Energy  metabolism  continues  unabated  for  a 
while  in  enucleates,  to  judge  by  their  vigorous  activity,  but  in  the 
course  of  several  days  ciliary  beating  becomes  progressively  slower, 
either  through  the  impairment  of  this  metabolism  or  by  failure  to 
replace  utilized  substrates.  The  ease  with  which  stentors  carrying 
much  more  or  less  of  the  normal  proportion  of  nuclear  material 
can  be  prepared  offers  unusual  opportunities  for  a  quantitative 
study  of  the  action  of  the  nucleus  on  the  cytoplasm.  Eventually 
such  studies  may  teach  us  why  and  how  a  fairly  constant  ratio 
between  nucleus  and  cytoplasm  is  maintained. 

Conversely,  the  Stentor  macronucleus  is  clearly  affected  in  many 
ways  by  the  cytoplasm,  in  addition  to  the  obvious  fact  that  cyto- 
plasmic environment  supplies  the  basis  for  the  growth  and 
integrity  of  the  nucleus.  The  location  of  the  macronucleus  is 
determined  by  the  stripe  pattern  or  geometry  of  the  ectoplasm. 
Cytoplasmic  events  evidently  guide  the  macronucleus  in  its 
complex  behavior  during  coalescence  and  renodulation.  Such 
control  of  the  nucleus  by  the  cytoplasm  is  at  least  as  extensive  as 
has  been  demonstrated  in  any  other  cell  and  in  Stentor  is  capable 
of  being  investigated  by  micrurgical  operations. 


CHAPTER    XVII 

TOWARD   A   GENETICS    OF   STENTOR 

The  collaborative  functions  of  nucleus  and  cytoplasm  can  further 
be  studied  by  artificial  exchange  of  nuclei  and  cytoplasms  between 
different  individuals  and  even  different  species  of  Stentor.  Poten- 
tially, natural  exchange  of  traceable  genetic  material  between 
members  of  the  same  species  through  conjugation  would  comple- 
ment such  investigations.  The  circumstance  common  to  both 
approaches  is  that  now  we  deal  with  qualitative  alterations  in  either 
the  cytoplasmic  or  nuclear  component,  or  both. 

I.  Interspecific  chimeras  and  nuclear  transplantations 

New  possibilities  for  experimentation  appeared  when  it  was 
found  that  different  species  of  Stentor  could  be  fused  together  by 
their  cytoplasms  in  enduring  unions,  and  that  when  foreign  nuclei 
are  transplanted  they  are  neither  immediately  ejected  nor  destroyed 
but  also  persist,  with  the  expectation  of  revealing  interactions 
between  species-different  nuclei  and  cytoplasms.  Many  combina- 
tions are  possible.  The  macronucleus  can  be  removed  and  replaced 
by  that  of  a  different  species.  Alien  cytoplasm  can  be  grafted  so 
that  the  host  nucleus  now  operates  w  ithin  a  mixture  of  cytoplasms, 
or  nuclei  alone  can  be  added  so  that  now  a  mixed  nuclear  comple- 
ment works  with  cytoplasm  almost  entirely  of  one  type.  And 
finally,  relative  amounts  of  the  two  types  of  nuclei  and  cytoplasms 
can  be  mixed  together  in  any  desired  combination.  The  parts  of 
three  species  could  also  be  joined  in  similar  permutations,  but  we 
need  first  to  work  out  the  simpler  combinations.  In  comparison 
with  the  possibilities,  the  work  which  has  so  far  been  done  (Tartar, 
1953,  1956c)  may  be  regarded  as  only  exploratory.  In  fact,  further 
development  of  these  studies  was  postponed  until  conditions 
governing  the  states  of  activation  and  inhibition  during  primordium 
formation,  as  well  as  the  effects  of  altering  the  nuclear-cytoplasmic 
ratio,  and  other  points  could  be  explored ;  for  all  these  factors  have 

V 

3" 


312  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

to  be  considered  in  arriving  at  any  reliable  interpretation  of  the 
effects  resulting  from  species  differences  in  cytoplasm  and  nuclei. 

What  may  be  called  the  capacity  of  foreign  macronuclear  nodes 
to  support  oral  primordium  formation  and  development  in 
enucleated  coeruleus  from  which  the  oral  region  was  also  removed 
has  received  a  preliminary  survey.  We  have  to  say  preliminary, 
because  nuclear  transfers  are  not  easy  and  the  number  of  cases 
with  certain  combinations  is  still  few.  That  there  should  be  many 
is  indicated  both  by  the  circumstance  that  one  cannot  always  be 
sure  that  the  last  macronuclear  node  of  the  coeruleus  has  been 
removed,  as  well  as  the  experience  of  Lorch  and  Danielli  (1950) 
with  interspecific  transfers  in  Amoeha  in  which  many  tests  gave 
negative  results  though  a  small  percentage  could  produce  effective 
combinations.  Hence  the  positive  result  is  more  significant  in 
showing  what  an  alien  combination  can  do ;  but  the  negative  result, 
in  which  no  primordium  formation  occurs,  may  be  merely  the 
result  of  other  factors  such  as  poor  viability  or  insufficient  number 
of  cases  to  include  possible  rare  instances  in  which  the  combination 
would  work. 

In  the  first  place,  controls  showed  that  nuclei  could  viably  be 
transferred  from  one  individual  to  another  among  similar  stocks 
of  coeruleus  leading  to  their  subsequent  complete  regeneration.  The 
next  closest  combination  was  between  typical  coeruleus  and  an 
organism  I  called  Stentor  ''X"  (Tartar,  1956c).  The  latter  was  a 
small,  blue-green  stentor  like  coeruleus  but  only  about  i/8th  its 
volume,  with  far  fewer  stripes,  usually  opaque  cytoplasm,  and  tiny 
nuclear  nodes.  This  organism  was  at  least  a  distinctly  different 
variety  of  coeruleus,  or  possibly  even  a  different  though  closely 
associated  species.  Transfers  could  be  made  in  both  directions  and 
it  was  found  that  the  nucleus  of  either  could  support  regeneration 
in  the  cytoplasm  of  the  other  (Fig.  88).  This  may  be  called  the 
expected  result,  because  we  can  assume  that  the  nature  of  nuclear 
support  of  regeneration  is  the  same  in  all  species  and  varieties  of 
Stentor.  Size  of  the  feeding  organelles  was  always  appropriate  for 
the  host  cytosome.  Yet  the  chimeras  did  not  survive  as  long  as 
controls  and  soon  died.  This  is  the  reason  it  is  thought  that  the 
two  were  distant  varieties,  if  not  separate  species.  The  appearance 
was,  therefore,  that  a  successful  interaction  between  nuclei  and 
cytoplasm  of  different  type  was  later  and  gradually  overwhelmed 


TOWARD    A    GENETICS    OF    STENTOR 


313 


Interactions    between    S.   coeruleus   and    Stentor  X, 

which  was  either  a  closely  related  species  or  a  dwarf  race. 

a:  S.  coeruleus.  b:  Stentor  X,  of  about  \  volume  of  former, 
fewer  stripes,  and  smaller  macronuclear  nodes,  a' :  X-nuclei 
implanted  into  enucleated  coeruleus  gives  complete  regeneration 
{a")  but  mouthparts  resorption  and  death  soon  follow  {a"'). 

b-b'" :  Similarly  for  the  reciprocal  cross.  Feeding  organelles 
are  in  proportion  to  size  of  the  cytosome  in  which  they  are  formed. 

ab :  Graft  of  the  2  forms  undergoes  simultaneous  reorganiza- 
tion and  integrates  the  two  shapes  into  a  doublet  {ab')  but  the 
specimen  then  died.    (After  Tartar,  1956c.) 


by  some  subtle  and  possibly  immunological  difference  which 
resulted  in  eventual  malfunctioning.  The  general  picture  suggested 
is  that  nucleus  and  cytoplasm  no  doubt  have  respective  roles  in  the 
act  of  cytodifferentiation  which  are  the  same  in  all  species,  but  that 
the  specific  adaptation  of  the  one  to  the  other  is  developed  to  such 
a  degree  that  sooner  or  later  a  disharmony  will  almost  always 
emerge  to  nullify  whatever  compatibilities  were  at  first  realized. 
Initially  it  appeared  that  polymorphus  macronucleus  could  not 
support  regeneration  in  coeruleus  cytoplasm  (Tartar,  1953),  but 
further  tests  (1956c)  showed  that  primordium  formation  at  least 
is  possible  (Fig.  89A).  Typically,  an  anlage  was  produced  which 
progressed  to  stage  4  and  then  was  resorbed.  Hence  there  was  some 
effective  interaction,  but  not  as  much  as  in  the  first  combination 
described.  In  regard  to  other  combinations,  it  was  found  that 
neither  roeseli  nor  niger  nucleus  supported  regeneration  in  coeruleus, 
but  there  was  one  positive  result  with  introversus  nucleus  which 
after   5    days   finally  led  to   satisfactory  oral   differentiation   in 


314 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


/% 


a      ■      b        ^    c  d 

Fig.  89.    Interactions  in  coeruleus  X  polymorphns  chimeras. 

A.  a :  Three  polymorphiis  macronuclear  nodes  implanted  into 
an  enucleated  coeruleus  with  mouthparts  excised,  b:  Wide 
primordium  forming  in  coeruleus  cytoplasm  under  influence  of 
polymorphus  nucleus,  12  hours  later,  c:  Anlage  not  developing, 
exudate  in  primordium  site,  and  original  coeruleus  membranelles 
fimbriated,    d:  Specimen  died  after  3  days  and  showed  6  nodes, 

indicating  nuclear  increase  in  alien  cytoplasm. 

B.  Mutual  integration  of  shape,  a:  Polymorphus  grafted  at 
right  angles  to  coeruleus.  b :  Harmonization  of  shapes  and  spread 
of  chlorellae  throughout,  c:  Oral  structures  dediflferentiated, 
coeruleus  pigment  lost,  chlorellae  clumped,    d:  Prompt  death  of 

species  combination.    (After  Tartar,  1953,  1956c.) 

coeruleus  cytoplasm.  If  pigmentation  is  a  sign  of  taxonomic  related- 
ness,  the  blue-green  color  of  both  introversus  and  coeruleus  suggests 
that  these  species  are  more  closely  related  than  others,  and  this 
could  be  the  basis  for  effective  interaction  between  their  parts. 
The  species  multiformis  is  also  blue-green  and  in  fact  appears  like 
a  miniature  of  coeruleus,  with  but  a  single  macronuclear  node. 
These  animals  are  so  small  that  a  whole  cell  had  to  be  implanted 
in  the  enucleated  coeruleus.  In  4  cases  no  regeneration  occurred, 
but  we  have  to  remember  that  regeneration  on  one  node  is  greatly 
retarded  so  that  in  this  combination  the  chimeras  may  have  run 
into  difficulties  of  another  sort  before  they  were  able  to  express 


TOWARD    A    GENETICS    OF    STENTOR  315 

their  regeneration  possibilities.  Nevertheless,  this  combination 
should  be  attractive  for  further  studies  because  of  the  great 
difference  in  size  together  with  general  similarities  in  other  respects. 

Nucleated  cells  and  cell  parts  were  grafted  to  obtain  mixtures 
of  widely  varying  proportions  of  coeruleus  and  of  a  polymorphus 
strain  which  was  grass-green  with  abundant  symbiotic  Chlorella. 
The  general  result  was  that  successful  oral  redifferentiation 
occurred  only  when  there  was  a  preponderance  of  one  species  of 
nucleus  in  a  preponderance  of  its  own  type  of  cytoplasm.  The 
more  nearly  the  two  types  of  cells  approached  equality  the  less 
successful  w^as  oral  reorganization,  and  instead  existing  feeding 
organelles  were  promptly  resorbed.  When  both  species  were 
represented  in  the  cytoplasm  but  with  the  nucleus  from  poly- 
morphus only,  some  oral  differentiation  occurred  and  the  indications 
are  therefore  that  there  is  a  conflict  between  the  nuclear  compo- 
nents such  that  polymorphus  nucleus  is  more  effective  when  acting 
on  a  mixture  alone. 

In  spite  of  incompatibilities  in  regard  to  oral  differentiation, 
mixtures  of  coeruleus  and  polymorphus  in  any  proportion  showed 
very  good  shape  reconstitution  as  manifested  by  the  realignment 
of  cells  and  cell  parts  to  form  a  single,  conical  stentor  shape 
(Fig.  89B),  and  was  better  than  that  of  enucleated  grafts  of  either 
species.  This  suggests  that  reorientation  of  the  cortical  pattern  is 
either  a  more  generalized  function  in  which  species  differences  are 
not  prominent  or  makes  less  precise  demands  on  nucleo- 
cytoplasmic  interaction.  Were  the  cytoplasm  less  specific  than 
the  nucleus,  as  appears,  this  would  substantiate  present-day 
conceptions  (Monne,  1948). 

In  these  quantitatively  varying  combinations  of  coeruleus  and 
polymorphus  it  was  also  found  that  any  considerable  admixture  of 
coeruleus  cytoplasm  resulted  in  the  ejection  of  chlorellae  from  the 
fusion  mass,  and  it  should  be  added  that  uniform  distribution  of 
the  symbionts  throughout  showed  there  was  complete  mixture  of 
the  endoplasm.  Hence  coeruleus  cytoplasm  appears  to  be  anti- 
thetical to  the  entertainment  of  the  symbionts.  Correspondingly, 
admixture  of  polymorphus  cytoplasm  resulted  in  depigmentation 
of  coeruleus. 

Similar  results  in  regard  to  pigmentation  have  been  found  in 
recent  tests  in  which  nucleated  coeruleus  was  fused  with  a  smaller 


3l6  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

portion  of  white  polymorphus  which  had  been  grown  in  the  dark 
and  contained  few  if  any  chlorellae  (unpubUshed).  Even  when  the 
portion  of  polymorphus  was  relatively  small  there  occurred  an 
aggregation  of  the  pigment  granules  of  coeruleus  into  splotches 
which  later  disappeared  so  that  the  fusion  complex  became  entirely 
colorless  and  very  much  resembled  in  general  appearance  the 
white  polymorphus  stock.  These  combinations  could  regenerate, 
reorganize  and  even  divide.  They  also  showed  several  interesting 
abnormalities  (Fig.  90A).  In  some  cases  the  form  of  the  cell  became 
abnormally  elongated  and  occasionally  this  also  led  to  a  complete 


Fig.  90.    Abnormalities  from  grafting  a  small  polymorphus  to 
a  large  coeruleus, 

A.  Abnormal  form  with  granular  core,  a:  Half  a  polymorphus 
engrafted,  with  cytoplasm  and  nucleus,  b:  Aggregations  of 
coeruleus  pigment  as  graft  causes  loss  of  pigmentation ;  mouth- 
parts  excised,  c:  Regeneration  of  colorless  chimera  resulting. 
d:  Snake-like  form  with  mass  of  colorless  granules  and  irregular 

distribution  of  nuclear  nodes. 

B.  Bleaching  and  failure  to  form  membranelles.  a:  Feeding 
organelles  of  grafted  polymorphus  resorbed,  coeruleus  fading,  with 
splotches  of  pigment  granules,  h:  Chimera  now  colorless,  with 
half-length  adoral  cilia  which  start  and  stop  together  but  show 
no  metachronal  beating  nor  organization  into  membranelles.  c: 
Reorganized  animal  may  have  longer  peristomal  cilia  but  still  no 
membranelles.    Eight  large  nuclear  nodes  are  seen.    Specimen 

died  on  day  7  in  isolation  on  slide. 


TOWARD    A    GENETICS    OF    STENTOR  317 

disruption  of  the  normal  form,  resembling  the  "amorphous 
phenotype"  (see  p.  276).  The  nuclear  picture  also  became 
abnormal,  with  nuclear  nodes  of  greatly  varying  size,  atypically 
located  within  the  cell. 

One  special  case  should  be  mentioned  in  detail  for  the  interesting 
possibilities  suggested.  Addition  of  the  polymorphus  component 
caused  the  major  coeruleus  part  to  dedifferentiate  its  original 
feeding  organelles,  and  when  regeneration  occurred  the  oral  cilia 
were  at  first  only  half  the  normal  size  and  never  did  they  group  into 
membranelles.  These  cilia  started  and  stopped  together  but  there 
was  no  metachronal  rhythm  as  when  membranelles  are  present 
(Fig.  90B).  An  oral  differentiation  was  obtained  which  was,  however, 
very  different  from  the  normal. 

In  these  chimeras,  the  complex  appeared  at  first  as  if  stricken 
by  the  shock  of  incompatibility,  and  regeneration  was  often  at 
first  abortive  or  incomplete ;  but  the  specimens  then  recovered  and 
generally  showed  good  oral  redifferentiation,  yet  with  the  abnor- 
malities described  often  appearing  later.  One  may  expect,  therefore, 
that  from  small  additions  of  one  species  of  Stentor  to  another, 
after  the  manner  of  transduction,  and  with  greater  skill  in  keeping 
the  specimens  alive,  very  interesting  results  will  emerge. 

Referring  again  to  the  combination  of  coeruleus  and  niger,  it  was 
found  that  the  coeruleus  cell  was  greatly  affected  by  the  addition 
of  a  relatively  small  piece  of  niger  cytoplasm  (Fig.  91).  In  only  one 
case  was  the  host  able  to  regenerate  and  maintain  good  feeding 
organelles,  for  in  other  tests  regeneration  was  incomplete  or  not 
even  begun  (Tartar,  1956c).  These  two  species  are  apparently  so 
distantly  related  that  even  a  small  admixture  of  niger  greatly  affects 
the  behavior  of  coeruleus^  including  the  condition  of  the  macro- 
nucleus.  Conversely,  coeruleus  caused  depigmentation  of  the  niger 
graft. 

The  studies  of  Hammerling  have  shown  that  in  the  unicellular 
and  uninucleate  plant,  Acetabularia,  the  cytoplasm  is  relatively 
passive  and  can  elaborate  cell  structures  with  the  support  of  any 
species  of  nucleus  of  this  genus  whidh  was  tested,  and  the  form  is 
that  of  the  species  contributing  the  nucleus  or  the  nuclear  products. 
For  in  combinations  containing  two  types  of  nuclei  the  form  was 
more  like  that  of  the  species  contributing  the  most  nuclei.  If  the 
nuclear  contributions  were  balanced  the  structures  produced  were 


3i8 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


B 


Fig.  91.    Effects  of  niger  graft  on  coeruleus. 

A.  Regeneration  blocked,  no  bleaching  of  coeruleus  —  the 
usual  result,  a:  Enucleate  niger  grafted  and  mouthparts  of 
coeruleus  excised,  b:  Yellow  niger  pigment  disappears  but  not 
the  coeruleus  coloration,  c:  In  spite  of  regression  of  niger  graft 
no  primordium  formation  occurs  and  macronucleus  becomes  of 

5  large  nodes. 

B.  Unusual  response  to  same  type  of  graft,  a:  Regeneration 
occurs,  with  a  secondary  primordium  forming  in  suture  between 
fine  niger  stripes  and  broad  striping  of  host,  b:  Only  the  host 
anlage  has  complete  stomatogenesis.  c:  re-regeneration  follows 
with  still  less  development  of  the  primordium  associated  with 
niger  graft.  Host  nucleus  abnormal,  with  few  and  unequal  nodes, 
two  of  which  migrated  to  lie  underneath  the  graft.     (After 

Tartar,  1956c.) 


in  character  halfway  between  those  of  the  two  species.  In  some 
combinations  differentiation  occurred  but  the  cooperation  of  the 
two  nuclei  was  defective  and  abnormal  structures  resulted,  as  in 
the  case  without  membranelles  in  Stentor. 

On  the  whole  this  behavior  is  quite  different  from  the  situation 
in  Stentor,  although  the  comparison  is  limited  by  the  fact  that 
all  stentors  produce  the  same  form  of  oral  differentiation.  In  Stentor 
the  cytoplasms  seem  to  be  much  more  specific  and  nuclei  are 


TOWARD    A    GENETICS    OF    STENTOR  319 

effective  in  alien  c\1:oplasm  only  when  the  taxonomic  relationship 
may  be  considered  close.  Another  difference  is  that  in  acetabularias 
both  growth  and  differentiation  can  occur  for  some  time  in  the 
absence  of  any  nucleus,  whereas  in  stentors  whatever  the  nucleus 
contributes  to  the  cvtoplasm  for  growth  and  morphogenesis  is  not 
stored  or  is  exceedingly  short-lived. 

Following  methods  devised  by  Comandon  and  de  Fonbrune 
(1939b),  Danielli  and  his  co-workers  have  made  exchanges  of 
nuclei  between  Amoeba  proteus  and  discoides  (Lorch  and  DanielU, 
1950,  1953;  DanielU  et  al.,  1955;  reviewed  to  date  in  DanieUi, 
1959).  In  either  transfer  the  enucleated  cell  of  one  species  recovered 
its  capacit}"  for  normal  pseudopodial  locomotion  and  its  sur^  ival 
was  promoted  after  receiving  a  nucleus  from  the  other.  For  the 
most  part  these  chimeras,  as  in  my  experience  with  stentors,  did 
not  survive;  but  in  one  instance  at  least  the  implantation  of  a 
proteus  nucleus  into  discoides  cytoplasm  did  produce  a  clone  which 
was  kept  in  mass  culture  for  over  8  years.  Back  transfers  showed 
that  both  nucleus  and  C}1:oplasm  became  altered  in  the  ahen 
combination,  but  the  proteus  nucleus  never  became  functionally 
or  morphologically  identical  to  that  of  discoides,  nor  did  the 
discoides  cytoplasm  become  the  same  as  that  oi  proteus. 

The  persisting  influence  of  both  the  nucleus  and  the  c\toplasm 
was  also  evident  in  such  characteristics  of  the  chimeras  as  nuclear 
size,  form  of  the  pseudopodia,  growth  rate,  and  response  to 
antiserum,  which  in  general  fell  between  those  expressed  by  the 
two  species  in  pure  form.  These  results  led  Danielli  (1958)  to 
emphasize  the  irreducible  importance  of  the  cytoplasm,  because 
it  was  never  completely  made  over  into  the  type  of  the  nuclear 
species,  and  to  suggest  the  reasonable  hypothesis  that  the  nucleus 
of  the  cell  determines  the  specific  types  of  macromolecules  which 
are  svnthesized,  while  the  cytoplasm  controls  the  way  in  which 
they  are  organized  into  functional  units.  This  conception  is 
certainly  indicated  by  studies  of  cihates  and  especially  of  Stentor. 
Faihire  of  regeneration  and  growth  in  the  absence  of  the  nucleus 
indicates  this  organelle  to  be  essential  for  svnthesis.  But  the  c\-to- 
plasm,  and  especially  the  ectoplasmic  pattern,  is  obviously 
intimately  concerned  with  guiding  nuclear  behavior  and  deter- 
mining the  location,  extent,  and  direction  of  asymmetry  of  the 
developing  feeding  organelles. 


320  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

2.  Racial  differences 

In  the  best  known  species,  coeruleus^  definable  differences  between 
various  stocks  and  clones  may  turn  out  to  be  inherited  racial 
differences  because  they  have  appeared  and  persisted  in  strains 
cultured  by  uniform  methods.  Since  we  still  lack  the  means  for 
inducing  conjugation  at  will  in  stentors,  the  most  fruitful  approach 
would  be  by  nuclear  exchanges  to  test  whether  these  traits  are 
determined  by  the  nucleus  or  the  cytoplasm.  In  one  instance  this 
has  been  done,  but  for  the  most  part  we  can  at  present  merely 
describe  possible  strain  differences  which  might  be  analyzed  in 
this  way. 

State  of  the  endoplasm.  Separate  clones  of  coeruleus  may  differ 
in  regard  to  the  transparency  of  the  endoplasm,  a  difference  which 
manifests  itself  very  clearly  in  the  ease  with  which  macronuclear 
nodes  can  be  made  out  in  enucleation  experiments.  The  two 
extremes  of  this  condition  are  shown  in  my  stock  from  Urbana, 
Illinois,  in  which  the  cytoplasm  is  consistently  transparent  so  that 
the  nucleus  is  clearly  visible  except  in  over-fed  animals,  and 
another  from  Stella,  Washington,  in  which  the  endoplasm  is 
notably  opaque,  except  when  the  animals  have  been  completely 
starved,  and  this  stock  has  also  remained  consistently  so 
characterized  for  4  years. 

Size.  If  the  Stentor  *'X"  mentioned  in  the  preceding  section 
was  indeed  a  race  of  coeruleus^  then  we  had  a  dwarf  variety  in  which 
the  cells  never  attained  a  volume  larger  than  about  i/8th  that  of 
most  stocks  of  this  species.  Other  stocks  of  coeruleus  seem  to  show 
much  less  striking  differences  in  the  maximum  size  attained,  but 
careful  measurements  might  reveal  consistent  size  differences  such 
as  have  already  been  found  in  other  genera  of  ciliates,  notably 
Paramecium. 

^^  Astomatous".  A  stock  of  coeruleus  obtained  from  Woods  Hole 
Biological  Supply  in  1950  was  unique  in  producing  some  indivi- 
duals temporarily  without  mouthparts  (Tartar,  1957b).  After 
growing  these  organisms  in  the  laboratory  for  4  years  it  was  noticed 
that  in  certain  subcultures  about  i  %  of  the  stentors  were  poorly 
fed  because  they  lacked  ingestive  organelles.  In  division,  reorgani- 
zation, and  regeneration  the  oral  primordium  developed  without 
its  posterior  end  invaginating  and  forming  a  gullet,  and  the  oral 
pouch   was   generally   missing.    The   membranellar   band   itself 


TOWARD    A    GENETICS    OF    STENTOR 


321 


appeared  altogether  normal,  and  it  seemed  to  be  of  the  usual  length, 
including  the  part  which  descends  into  the  gullet,  because  this 
band  curved  into  a  long  spiral  (Fig.  92).  If  this  appearance  is 
correctly  interpreted,  then  normal  length  of  the  row  of  membra- 
nelles  is  not  used  as  a  sign  that  successful  oral  differentiation  has 
been  completed;  for  regeneration  or  reorganization  then  followed. 


Fig.  92.  Astomatous  primordium  development  in  Woods  Hole 
race  of  S.  coeruleus.  Normal  animal  reorganizes,  producing 
peristomal  anlage  of  normal  length  which  fails  to  invaginate  to 
form  mouthparts.  Following  regeneration  now  produces 
complete  mouthparts.  Animal  feeds  and  divides,  forming 
daughters  with  complete  feeding  organelles  but  each  having  one 
unusually  large  macronuclear  node. 

with  the  production  in  the  same  individual,  usually  on  the  first  try, 
of  good  mouthparts.  The  animals  could  then  feed,  explaining  why 
the  abnormality  did  not  result  in  its  own  extinction  but  persisted 
in  the  subcultures  for  about  a  year,  after  which  only  normal 
animals  have  been  found.  Astomatous  stentors  appeared  normal 
in  other  respects  except  for  a  variability  in  size  of  the  macro- 
nuclear  nodes,  and  analysis  of  this  trait  is  the  more  difficult  because 
the  same  individual  could  manifest  both  the  complete  and  incom- 
plete development  of  the  feeding  organelles.  Isolated  normals 
could  pass  through  the  mouthless  phase  while  astomatous  indivi- 
duals later  became  normal.  Anterior  and  posterior  fragments  did 
not  differ  significantly  in  the  frequency  with  which  they  regenerated 
incompletely.  Until  this  abnormality  reappears  and  can  be  studied 


322  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

further,  we  can  only  note  that  since  the  mouthparts  are  induced  by 
the  ectoplasm  of  the  posterior  pole,  this  induction  or  its  gradient 
basis  is  apparently  highly  labile  in  certain  stocks. 

Fluorescence.  That  fluorescence  is  characteristic  of  certain  races 
of  coeruleus  was  discovered  by  MoUer  (see  p.  48),  these  animals 
when  killed  appearing  red  in  ultraviolet  radiation.*  Other  races  lack 
the  trait,  although  they  look  the  same  in  visible  light  because  the 
major  component  of  the  pigment  is  the  same  in  all  coeruleus  and  is 
not  fluorescent.  Whiteley  and  Moller  (unpublished)  neatly  demon- 
strated fluorescence  to  be  a  trait  under  control  of  the  nucleus.  When 
animals  of  a  fluorescent  race  were  enucleated,  the  fluorescence  soon 
disappeared;  or  if  the  macronucleus  of  fluorescents  was  replaced 
by  the  nucleus  of  a  non-fluorescent  race  the  fluorescence  still 
disappeared.  Therefore  the  manifestation  and  maintenance  of  this 
trait  seems  to  depend  upon  the  presence  of  a  certain  type  of 
nucleus  and  may  be  regarded  as  a  genetic  characterization  of  great 
interest  in  itself  and  also  potentially  valuable  in  tagging  cells  of 
diflferent  origin. 

Cannibalism}  In  the  discussion  of  feeding  reactions  in  stentors, 
reference  has  already  been  made  to  the  work  of  Gelei  (1925)  on 
cannibalism  in  coeruleus.  One  of  the  main  points  of  this  study  was 
that  the  proclivity  for  eating  one's  fellows  is  a  racial  character. 
This  conclusion  was  based  on  the  observation  that  some  samples 
from  a  culture,  containing  a  natural  collection  of  stentors  which 
was  not  a  clone,  showed  cannibalism  and  others  did  not.  Daughters 
of  cannibals  cannibalized  each  other.  Even  when  not  densely  con- 
centrated, and  regardless  of  whether  they  were  well-fed  or  not, 
cannibals  seemed  actively  to  pursue  their  fellows,  while  in  other 
samples  the  stentors  simply  turned  away  on  encountering  each 
other.  On  dubious  grounds  Ivanic  (1927)  questioned  that  canni- 
balism is  a  racial  character  in  protozoa,  including  Stentor.  More 
to  the  point  is  my  observation  of  cannibalism  in  all  9  stocks  or 
clones  of  coeruleus  which  I  have  under  cultivation,  strongly  indicat- 
ing that  cannibalism  is  common  to  all  representatives  of  this 
species  regardless  of  origin. 

Other  possible  racial  differences  have  been  indicated  in  respect 
of  the  following  characteristics:  Requirement,  or  not,  for  high 

*Lately  (i960)  Moller  reports  that  some  races  of  S.  coeruleus  exhibit 
all  degrees  of  fluorescence. 


TOWARD    A    GENETICS    OF    STENTOR  323 

oxygen  tension  (see  p.  265).  Presence  of  3,  or  of  2  rows  of  cilia  in 
the  membranelles  (p.  30).  Acclimatization,  or  not,  to  alcohols 
(p.  248).  Suitability,  or  not,  of  certain  culture  media,  like  Benecke's 
solution  ior  polymorphus  (p.  268).  Negative,  or  indifferent,  response 
to  light,  as  shown  by  coeruleus  (p.  22).  Presence,  or  absence  of 
visible  nucleoli;  for  de  Terra  (1959)  remarked  a  race  of  coeruleus 
without  nucleoli,  but  Schwartz  (1935)  demonstrated  their  presence 
in  his  strain.  And  average  number  of  macronuclear  nodes  (MoUer, 
unpublished). 

3.  Conjugation 

Sexual  reproduction  by  temporary  fusion  of  partner  animals 
with  cross-fertiHzation  and  complete  renewal  of  the  nuclear 
apparatus  occurs  in  Stentor  as  in  other  ciliates.  Breeding  experi- 
ments towards  an  analysis  of  inheritance  and  the  roles  of  nucleus 
and  cytoplasm  in  the  development  of  racial  differences,  which 
may  well  include  mating  types,  should  therefore  eventually  be 
possible  in  this  genus.  Yet  conjugation  is  rarely  observed  and 
seems  to  be  quite  adventitious  in  its  appearance,  for  the  means 
have  yet  to  be  discovered  by  which  stentors  can  be  induced  to 
conjugate  as  we  desire.  There  is  available,  nevertheless,  a  com- 
prehensive cytological  study  of  sexual  reproduction  in  Stentor 
which  has  been  generally  neglected  in  reviews  of  this  subject. 

The  general  occurrence  of  conjugation  in  the  genus  Stentor  is 
attested  by  the  observation  of  pairs  in  niger  (Stein,  1867),  coeruleus 
(Moxon,  1869;  Balbiani,  1891c),  igneus  (Johnson,  1893),  poly- 
morphus (Mulsow,  1913)  and  in  roeseli  (Balbiani).  I  also  observed 
fusion  pairs  in  a  colorless  race  oi  polymorphus  in  which  symbiotic 
chlorellae  were  almost  completely  lacking.  In  seven  stocks  of 
coeruleus,  conjugation  in  five  was  observed  at  least  once  during  a 
period  of  10  years.  Schwartz  (1935)  remarked  that  he  found  no 
evidence  of  autogamy  in  his  extensive  studies  of  coeruleus;  and  I, 
too,  have  never  seen  any  indication  of  nuclear  renewal  in  unpaired 
animals. 

Exploratory  studies  of  conjugation  were  included  within  the 
compass  of  those  works  by  Balbiani  and  Johnson  to  which  we  have 
so  often  referred.  Finding  that  the  old  macronucleus  could  be 
distinguished  by  its  no  longer  being  clear  and  refractive  in  living 
animals,  Balbiani  (1891c,  1893)  studied  the  behavior  of  fragments 


324  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

in  relation  thereto.  Pieces  of  exconjugants  did  not  resorb  the  old 
portions  of  the  macronucleus  if  new  nuclear  anlagen  were  not 
present  in  them.  New  macronuclei  could  support  regeneration 
from  the  start,  but  after  the  first  stages  of  disintegration  the  old 
nucleus  could  not.  These  conclusions  are  in  line  with  what  is 
found  in  other  ciliates,  and  I  also  have  noted  that  coeruleus  which 
had  begun  conjugation  were  unable  to  regenerate  excised  oral  parts. 

That  the  proper  conditions  for  conjugation  seldom  occur  was 
noted  in  the  first  extensive  study  by  Hamburger  (1908),  who 
remarked  that  Stentor  cultures  may  be  carried  on  for  years  without 
noticing  pair-formation.  When  conjugation  does  occur  only  about 
I  to  10%  of  the  animals  are  involved  so  that  no  mass  **  epidemics  " 
occur,  as  in  Paramecium.  She  also  found  that  many  isolated  single 
animals  from  cultures  in  which  conjugation  was  occurring  did  not 
themselves  subsequently  pair.  Her  study  was  therefore  of  only  55 
conjugants,  the  products  of  which  did  not  live  sufficiently  long  to 
reveal  the  complete  nuclear  transformations.  Later,  Mulsow 
obtained  material  from  mixed  pond  samples  which  were  rich  in 
fauna  and  flora.  They  were  left  unfed  in  the  laboratory  and  after 
a  week  apparently  abundant  conjugation  of  coeruleus  and  poly- 
morphus  present  occurred.  The  experience  was  repeatable  on  fresh 
samples.  Bad  conditions  may  have  developed  in  the  jars  because 
all  the  stentors  died  following  the  period  of  conjugation.  Possibly 
a  putrid  condition  developed  although  he  did  not  say  so.  At  the 
same  time  Paramecium  and  Frontonia  present  in  the  samples  also 
conjugated,  which  would  indicate  that  methods  employed  for 
paramecia  might  be  applicable  to  stentors.  However,  I  have  made 
mixtures  of  5  stocks  of  coeruleus  in  the  hope  of  providing  mating 
type  diversity,  and  subjected  them  to  feeding  and  starvation 
routines  to  which  paramecia  are  usually  responsive,  but  this  first 
attempt  to  induce  conjugation  was  entirely  unsuccessful. 

Mulsow's  (191 3)  study  included  over  2,000  conjugating  pairs  of 
coeruleus  and  a  smaller  but  substantial  number  of  polymorphus 
conjugants,  incidentally  confirming  many  of  the  points  made  by 
his  predecessors.  He  was  able  to  keep  his  exconjugant  animals 
considerably  beyond  the  period  required  for  completion  of  all 
transformations.  Sectioned  material  was  studied,  for  he  found  that 
squashed  preparations  and  total  amounts  were  not  satisfactory.  I 
have  tried  to  express  Mulsow's  account  of  the  course  of  conjugation 


TOWARD    A    GENETICS    OF    STENTOR  325 

in  these  two  species  in  the  diagrams  and  legends  of  Fig.  93  and  94 
and  therefore  will  touch  only  the  main  points  in  the  following 
paragraphs. 

S.  coeruleus:  The  size  of  conjugating  animals  is  always  smaller 
than  the  maximum,  as  Hamburger  had  also  noted,  and  Johnson 
observed  that  conjugants  were  without  food  vacuoles  apparently 
from  the  start.  Sometimes  the  partners  are  of  different  sizes  but 
they  are  not  necessarily  so  and  hence  there  was  no  indication  of 
** gamete"  differentiation.  All  this  accords  with  my  own  observa- 
tion. Attachment  is  by  the  anterior  rim  so  that  the  partners  rest  at 
an  angle  to  one  another  and  swim  together  with  their  axes  parallel. 
In  the  conjugants  I  have  observed  there  was  always  a  special  place 
of  attachment :  a  patch  immediately  below  the  membranellar  band 
and  to  the  left  of  the  mouth.  In  location  this  point  corresponds  to 
Hamburger's  figure  though  she  said  that  attachment  was  by  the 
membranellar  bands.  That  this  locus  of  joining  is  not  invariable, 
however,  is  shown  by  the  fact  that  Mulsow  often  found  three 
animals  together  in  conjugation,  all  undergoing  nuclear  changes 
simultaneously.  He  also  found  that  the  degree  of  union  is  variable, 
from  a  small  bridge  to  quite  complete  fusion  of  the  two  lateral 
surfaces,  and  that  this  does  not  depend  on  the  stage  of  conjugation. 
Hence  there  may  be  endoplasmic  fusion,  but  the  migratory  nucleus 
always  penetrates  through  a  separating,  pigmented  membrane 
toward  the  anterior  end.  The  duration  of  the  union  is  about 
30  hours,  which  is  not  unusual,  and  nuclear  renewal  is  not 
completed  until  10  days  after  separation. 

The  old  rnacronucleus  first  breaks  up  into  separate  nodes  which 
then  lose  their  orderly  arrangement  in  a  chain  as  well  as  their 
adherence  to  the  inside  of  the  ectoplasm.  Johnson  had  observed 
that  the  nodes  carry  cytoplasmic  (attachment?)  threads  as  they 
break  loose  from  their  former  locations  and  are  carried  about  in 
the  cell  by  a  cyclosis  of  the  endoplasm,  which  is  unusually  rapid 
in  conjugation.  At  this  time.  Hamburger  said  that  the  nodes  lose 
their  amorphous  character  and  show  a  honeycomb  structure.  The 
original  macronucleus  so  remains  until  its  parts  begin  disappearing 
as  soon  as  the  new  macronuclear  anlagen  have  attained  considerable 
size. 

After  breakup  of  the  macronucleus  into  separate  nodes,  the 


326 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Conjugation    in    S.   coeruleus,   largely    following   the 
account  of  Mulsow,  191 3. 


1.  Stentors  attach  by  areas  just  below  membranellar  bands, 
maintaining  a  separating  partition  or  fusing  to  some  degree. 

2.  Old  macronuclear  nodes  break  apart,  become  spherical,  and 
may  show  honeycomb  structure.    (These  organelles  are  omitted 
from  subsequent  drawings  up  to  stage  11.)    The  50-70  micro- 
nuclei  are  near  the  macronuclear  nodes. 

3.  Micronuclei  separate  freely  in  the  cytoplasm,  all  enlarging 

and  stain  less  intensely. 

4.  Up  to  10  micronuclei  in  both  cells  degenerate.  Others 
divide  mitotically  but  not  simultaneously,  giving  about  60  nuclei 
in  each.  These  are  probably  not  maturation  but  "multiplicative" 
divisions.    Stages  in  mitosis  are  shown  below: 

a:  homogeneous,  swollen  micronucleus. 

b:   parachute    stage,    with   chromatin    at   one    end,    single 

spindle  pole  at  the  other. 
c:   chromatin  pulling  toward  equator  (by  traction  fibers?). 

Degeneration  may  occur  after  this  phase. 
d:  equatorial  ring  of  chromatin. 
e:   development    of   second    spindle    pole,    spindle    fibers 

pointing  toward  centrioles. 
/.•    polar  cones  flatten  as  nucleus  becomes  cylindrical;  no 

fibers  found  between  chromosomes,  approximately  80 

in  number. 


TOWARD    A    GENETICS    OF    STENTOR 


g:  anaphase  separation. 

h:  chromosomes  reach  poles  as  granules,  and  spindle  body 
disappears. 

5.  Nuclei  near  the  partition  may  be  the  sexual  nuclei,  con- 
siderably reduced  in  size  from  reduction  of  chromosomes  to  20 
by  maturation  division.  Further  division  figures  and  degenerating 

mitoses  elsewhere. 

6.  Exchange  of  migratory  pronuclei. 

7.  Fertilization  and  first  2  divisions  of  the  amphinucleus. 

a:  male    pronucleus    becomes    surrounded    by    halo    of 

cytoplasm. 
b:  halo  carried  with  it  as  it  penetrates  partition  into  the 

partner  cell. 
c :   nucleus  with  chromatin  massed  forward  breaks  free  from 

halo. 
d:  union  of  male  pronucleus  with  female,  which  is  larger 

and  more  loosely  formed. 
e:   fertilization    spindle    figure,    always    surrounded    by    a 

thickened  cytoplasmic  halo.- 
/;    termination  of  this  first  division. 
g:  beginning    of    second    division,    with    parachute-form 

nuclei. 
h:  division  produces  4  similar  products. 

8.  Partners,  each  with  four  new  nuclei,  now  separate. 


w 


328  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

many  micronuclei  depart  from  their  location  on  or  near  the  macro- 
nuclear  surface  and  become  freed  in  the  endoplasm.  All  become 
greatly  enlarged  and  hence  less  strongly  staining.  Then  occur  a 
series  of  non-simultaneous  mitotic  divisions,  but  increase  in  the 
number  of  micronuclei  is  overbalanced  by  the  fact  that  many 
degenerate  even  after  they  have  begun  the  first  stages  of  mitosis. 
As  these  divisions  proceed,  the  remaining  micronuclei  become 
smaller  and  fewer  in  number  until  there  is  only  one  sexual  nucleus 
in  each  partner.  Presumably  the  penultimate  division  is  the  first 
maturation  division  and  division  of  the  last  remaining  micronucleus 
is  the  second  maturation  division  with  reduction  in  number  of 
chromosomes  in  the  migrating  and  stationary  pronuclei  formed. 

The  migrating  pronucleus  then  becomes  surrounded  by  a  halo  of 
homogeneous,  darkly-staining  cytoplasm.  Nucleus  and  halo  both 
break  through  the  separation  membrane  to  move  across  to  the 
partner  cell  so  that  there  is  always  a  small  exchange  of  cytoplasm. 
At  early  stages  it  appears  that  this  cytoplasm  is  pulling  the  nucleus 
along,  later  the  reverse.  Once  across,  the  migratory  pronucleus 
breaks  loose  from  its  halo  and  unites  with  the  partner  stationary 
pronucleus  of  different  appearance.  The  fertiHzation  nucleus  then 
becomes  itself  surrounded  by  a  thickened  halo  and  undergoes  two 
post-fertilization  divisions  giving  rise  to  four  simpler  nuclei. 

Separation  of  the  animals  occurs  about  this  time.  Two  of  the 

9.  Two  nuclei  form  macronuclear  anlagen  and  two  produce 
mitotic  spindles  but  without  showing  chromosomes  and  will 

form  4  micronuclei. 

10.  Day  after  separation  i  to  10  macronuclear  anlagen, 
depending  on  combinations  of  fusion  and  amitotic  increase. 

Four  micronuclei. 

11.  Two-four  days  after  separation.  Anlagen  with  chromatin 
net  resembling  chromosomes,  and  nucleoli  appear.  Old  macro- 
nuclear nodes  resorb  as  soon  as  anlagen  attain  same  size.  Micro- 
nuclear  increase  by  mitosis  with  clearly  defined  chromosomes. 

12.  Constriction  of  anlagen  into  nodes  and  their  attaching 
together.  They  are  not  sorted  out  between  daughter  cells. 
Micronuclei  have  final  size  and  location  but  are  not  yet  of 

definitive  number. 

13.  First  fission  10  days  after  separation  of  conjugants,  with 
the   usual  vegetative   division   of  nuclei   producing  2   normal 

vegetative  stentors  (14). 


TOWARD    A    GENETICS    OF    STENTOR  329 

nuclei  remain  heavily  chromatic  and  will  form  macronuclear 
anlagen,  while  the  other  two  undergo  mitosis,  but  without  showing 
clear  chromosomes,  and  produce  four  equal  micronuclei.  The 
number  of  macronuclear  anlagen  then  changes  by  combined 
fusions  and  amitoses  so  that  there  may  be  i  to  10  masses. 

Two  to  four  days  after  separation  the  appearance  is  as  follows : 
macronuclear  anlagen  enlarge  and  show  at  first  a  chromatin  net- 
work resembling  chromosomes,  and  nucleoli  appear.  The  nodes 
of  the  old  macronucleus  then  begin  absorbing.  By  mitotic  division, 
with  appearance  of  definable  chromosomes,  the  micronuclei 
increase  in  number.  Eight  days  after  separation  the  macronuclear 
anlagen  separately  constrict  into  nodes  or  chains  of  beads  which 
then  attach  together  to  form  the  definitive  macronuclear  chain 
along  which  the  micronuclei,  now  of  their  final  size  and  number, 
find  their  location.  There  is  hence  no  sorting  out  of  anlagen  between 
daughter  cells,  and  when  the  first  division  occurs  10  days  after 
separation  this  is  the  fission  of  an  animal  which  has  in  itself 
regained  the  completely  normal  nuclear  picture.  Two  variations 
in  macronuclear  development  were  described  but  these  may  have 
been  pathological. 

S.  polymorphus:  Conjugation  in  this  species  is  of  course  quite 
similar.  Multiplicative  divisions  of  the  micronuclei  and  concomi- 
tant degenerations  occur  as  in  coeruleus.  Cross-fertilization  was 
established,  but  the  amphinucleus  divides  three  times  to  produce 
8  products  before  nuclear  differentiation  begins.  Normally  6  of 
these  form  macronuclear  anlagen  by  increasing  in  size  and  pro- 
ducing from  the  karyosome  a  spireme,  later  breaking  into  segments 
or  chromosomes  which  seem  to  be  in  the  diploid  number  and  split 
in  two  longitudinally,  like  chromosomes,  before  they  are  reduced 
to  chromatin  granules.  The  anlagen  then  nodulate  and  join  to  form 
the  definitive  macronucleus.  The  two  remaining  products  of  the 
amphinucleus  form  the  micronuclei  by  repeated  mitotic  divisions, 
during  which  the  nuclei  decrease  in  size.  Because  the  number  of 
macronuclear  and  micronuclear  anlagen  may  vary,  it  seems  likely 
that  the  8  products  of  the  third  division  of  the  amphinucleus  are 
still  equivalent,  and  that  differentiation  is  not  predeterminedand 
might  even  be  guided  by  their  location  in  the  cell,  as  is  the  case  in 
other  ciliates. 


330 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


e 


f 


e 


©■ 


Fig.  94.    Conjugation  in  S.  polymorphus,  following  the  account 

of  Mulsow,  1913.    (Early  stages  are  like  those  numbered  i  to  6 

in  coeruleus,  Fig.  93.) 

a:  Both  migratory  and  stationary  pronuclei  surrounded  by 
halos  of  cytoplasm  excluding  chlorellae,  that  of  the  female 
nucleus  being  stellate.  Immediately  preceding  maturation 
divisions  apparently  reduced  the  chromosomes  from  56 
to  28  and  from  28  to  14,  the  latter  by  seemingly  transverse 
division.  Male  pronucleus  flattens  as  a  disc  against  the 
partition. 

b:  Male  nucleus  breaks  through  and  unites  with  partner's 
stationary  pronucleus. 

c:    First  mitotic  division  of  the  amphinucleus. 

d:  Products  retain  cytoplasmic  halos  and  have  karyosomes 
with  achromatic  fibers  connecting  to  nuclear  membranes. 

e:  Second  division,  halos  disappeared  and  56  pear-shaped 
chromosomes,  producing  — 

/;     Four  nuclei  with  karyosomes. 

g:  Third  division,  simultaneous,  yielding  8  nuclei,  6  of  which 
usually  form  macronuclear  anlagen  and  have  karyosomes, 
and  usually  2,  becoming  granular,  form  the  new 
micronuclei. 

h:  Division  and  reduction  in  size  of  progenitors  of 
micronuclei. 

/.•  Separation  of  partners,  each  usually  with  6  macronuclear 
anlagen  and  4  micronuclei. 

j:  Karyosome  of  macronuclear  anlage  forms  chromatic 
spireme. 


TOWARD    A    GENETICS    OF    STENTOR  331 

In  the  polymorphus  studied  by  Mulsow,  the  micronuclei  showed 
larger  and  fewer  chromosomes  than  his  coeriileus.  The  latter 
seemed  to  have  about  80  in  the  vegetative  stage,  while  the  com- 
parable number  in  polymorphus  was  close  to  56.  Therefore,  in 
polymorphus,  Mulsow  could  demonstrate  reduction  of  chromosomes 
during  maturation  divisions  as  he  could  not  in  coeruleus.  During 
maturation  the  micronucleus  is  not  homogeneous  but  has  a  central 
chromatic  body  and  it  is  surrounded  by  a  halo  of  clear  cytoplasm 
without  symbiotic  chlorellae.  The  number  of  chromosomes 
seemed  to  be  at  first  halved  to  about  28  and  then,  when  the  final 
division  of  the  last  remaining  micronucleus  into  the  two  pronuclei 
occurred,  the  chromosomes  appeared  to  be  further  reduced  to  14. 
Such  double  reduction  would  be  entirely  anomalous,  as  Mulsow 
noted,  and  would  even  call  into  question  whether  the  bodies 
observed  were  in  fact  true  chromosomes.  I  suppose  that  this 
paradox  can  be  resolved  on  the  basis  that  in  ciliates  chromosomes 
are  sometimes  dumbbell-shaped  and  only  apparently  double.  If  the 
chromosome  number  in  coeruleus  is  reduced  from  80  to  20,  as 
Mulsow  indicates,  one  wonders  why  he  did  not  also  consider  this 
a  case  of  apparent  double  reduction. 

Conjugation  accomplishes  at  least,  and  probably  mainly,  a 
recombination  of  chromosomes  with  their  varying  genetic  deter- 
minants, both  by  the  selection  of  one  set  of  chromosomes  from 
two  for  the  pronucleus  of  one  animal,  and  the  combination  of  these 
with  a  pronucleus  from  a  different  individual.  This  is  accomplished 
through  the  micronuclei  which  alone  seem  to  retain  the  capacity 
to  form  typical  chromosomes,  but  any  recombinant  difference 
resulting  has  to  be  transmitted  to  the  macronucleus  which  alone 


k:   Anlage  enlarges. 

/:     Spireme  fragments  into  pieces  —  like  chromosomes  —  of 

different  length  but  equal  thickness. 
m:  These  chromosomes  split  longitudinally  into  56  pairs. 
n:    Some  chromosomes  disappear  (?). 
o:    Chromatic  bodies  now  with  nucleoli,  "plastin"  body  with 

chromatic  center  develops  and  later  disappears. 
p:   Anlagen  nodulate  and  attach;  micronuclei  multipled  by 

mitosis.     Normal    vegetative    stentor  produced   before 

first  fission  following  separation  of  conjugants. 


332  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

can  and  may  solely  support  the  phenotypic  expressions  in  the 
form  and  functions  of  the  cell.  Hence  the  old  macronucleus  has 
to  be  destroyed  though  it  seems  to  be  carried  along  for  support  of 
the  cell  until  the  new  nucleus  is  ready  to  take  over.  We  know 
practically  nothing  of  how  the  intricate  machinations  of  the  micro- 
nuclei  are  guided  such  that  some  degenerate  and  others  do  not, 
that  one  should  form  a  stationary  and  the  other  a  migratory 
pronucleus,  and  that  of  the  products  of  their  union  some  should 
produce  the  macronucleus  and  others  remain  as  micronuclei.  Yet 
it  can  be  assumed  that  grafting,  like  cutting  experiments,  are  as 
possible  in  conjugating  stentors  as  in  vegetatives ;  and  this  presages 
a  new  field  of  experimentation  in  which  the  manipulation  of 
conjugating  animals  in  a  variety  of  ways,  or  the  grafting  of  con- 
jugants  to  non-conjugants  or  to  other  conjugants  of  a  different 
stage,  or  the  fusion  of  different  species  of  stentors  during  conjuga- 
tion, may  provide  clues  toward  an  analysis  and  understanding  of 
the  forces  at  work  during  the  amazing  performance  of  fertilization 
and  nuclear  renewal. 


CHAPTER    XVIII 

SPECIES   OF   STENTOR 

Brief  histories  of  our  knowledge  of  the  kinds  of  stentor  are 
included  in  Kent's  Manual  of  the  Infusoria  (1881)  and  in  Johnson's 
monumental  study  of  the  genus  (1893).  The  first  recorded  observa- 
tions of  the  group  were  made  by  Abraham  Trembley  of  Hydra 
fame.  In  a  letter  to  the  Royal  Society  of  London  (1744)  he 
described  "funnel-like  polypes"  of  green,  blue,  and  white  types 
which  would  correspond  to  the  present  species  called  polymorphus, 
coeruleus,  and  roeseli  or  muelleri.  Feeding,  with  both  rejection  and 
retention  of  particles  he  noted.  Division  was  correctly  described 
as  being  oblique  and  this  was  confirmed  somewhat  later  with  much 
surprise  by  Packard  (1937).  The  present  5.  roeseli  was  included  in 
Linnaeus'  Sy sterna  Naturce,  tenth  edition  of  1767,  under  the 
name  of  Hydra  stentorea.  Stentors  were  later  clearly  differentiated 
from  hydras  and  the  first  use  of  the  generic  title  Stentor  for  this 
group  was  made  by  Oken  in  his  Lehrbuch  der  Naturgeschichte^ 
1815. 

Oken's  genus  was  not  taxonomically  accurate,  for  it  included 
vorticellids  and  rotifers  and  did  not  consistently  use  the  binomial 
nomenclature.  Nevertheless,  to  retain  a  well-known  name,  the 
genus  Stentor  Oken  181 5  was  recently  validated  at  the  instigation 
of  Kirby  (1956),  whose  account  of  the  generic  term  is  here 
summarized.  It  is  well  that  this  was  done  because  at  one  time  the 
name  had  been  suggested  for  a  group  of  howler  monkeys.  S. 
muelleri  was  chosen  as  the  type  species  since  it  was  the  first  species 
adequately  described  and  figured,  by  Ehrenberg  in  1831. 

Descriptions  of  the  more  common  and  better  known  species 
coeruleus  and  polymorphus  have  already  acquainted  the  reader  with 
the  general  morphology  of  this  genus.  The  most  outstanding 
features  in  common  are  the  trumpet  shape  from  which  the  group 
derives  its  name,  conspicuous  contractility  throughout  the  length 
of  the  body,  longitudinal  rows  of  cilia  throughout,  attachment  by 

333 


334 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


a  holdfast  at  the  pointed  end,  and  at  the  other  end  a  wholly  frontal 
disposition  of  the  feeding  organelles,  which  spiral  clockwise  as  seen 
from  above,  and  consist  most  obviously  of  an  almost  complete 
circle  of  membranelles  terminating  in  a  mouth  but  with  no 
undulating  membrane.  The  implication  of  variable  morphology  in 
the  names  polymorphus  and  multiformis  is  misleading  and  erroneous. 
The  most  complete  and  recent  treatment  of  the  taxonomy  of 
stentors  is  to  be  found  in  the  great  work  of  Kahl  (1935)  on  the 
classification  of  ciliates.  Since  his  writing,  one  species  has  been 


/eti£i 


-pohfTnOt-phuS 


roeseli 


mzijelLeri 


pi/gmseus 


Fig.  95.  Species  of  Stentor.  The  coerideus  is  about  500 /x  in 
length  and  others  are  approximately  in  scale.  S.  pygmceiis  after 
Swarczewsky,  1929;  rubra  and  loricata  after  Bary,  1950;  felici 
after  Villeneuve-Brachon,  1940;  and  amethystiniis  after  Kahl, 
1935-  S.  introversus  (contracted  and  expanded;  after  Tartar, 
1958a)  and  others  were  drawn  from  life, 


SPECIES    OF    STENTOR  335 

transferred  to  a  different  genus  and  a  few  new  ones  have  been 
added.  Stentors  are  perhaps  most  easily  confused  with  unstalked 
vorticellids,  but  the  latter  have  ciliary  rows  which  are  transverse 
rather  than  longitudinal  and  the  oral  band  spirals  in  the  opposite 
direction. 

A  key  to  the  species  and  guide  to  synonomy  was  provided  by 
Kahl.  Drawing  on  the  available  literature  and  mindful  that  I  have 
not  seen  every  one  of  the  species,  I  shall  attempt  to  give  a  brief  but 
distinguishing  description  of  each,  illustrated  by  the  frontispiece 
and  Fig.  95.  For  all  its  variability,  size  is  still  a  useful  criterion. 
Approximate  average  diameters  of  contracted  animals  are  given, 
because  the  degree  of  extension  is  variable  and  samples  to  be 
examined  are  generally  not  in  repose.  New  species  have  been 
described  from  a  single  specimen  but  this  is  certainly  to  be 
frowned  upon,  because  stentors  can  easily  be  injured  when  pipetted 
with  filamentous  algae  and  may  retain  abnormal  or  incompleted 
shapes  for  some  time.  Moreover,  in  the  method  of  cell  fusion  by 
grafting  we  now  have  a  new  means  for  testing  species  differences. 
When  diverse  forms  are  combined  in  about  equal  proportions  they 
appear  as  if  stricken  and  do  not  produce  viable  clones  as  do  fusion 
complexes  of  like  species. 

The  following  species  have  blue  to  greenish  or  violet  pigment 
granules : 

S.  coeruleus  Ehrenberg  1830.  This  is  the  large,  cerulean  blue 
species,  largest  (350/x)  of  all  the  stentors,  with  a  moniliform 
macronucleus. 

S.  loricata  Bary  1950.  The  only  large,  self-pigmented  green 
stentor  which  builds  a  case  or  lorica.  The  macronucleus  is  vermi- 
form. So  far  reported  only  from  a  stream  in  New  Zealand. 

S.  multiformis  Miiller  1786.  This  is  a  tiny  (95 /x)  blue-green 
stentor  with  an  oval  macronucleus.  (A  few  further  comments  are 
apropos.  When  swimming,  these  stentors  often  appear  plump,  with 
rounded  posterior  ends.  They  have  few  —  approximately  25  — 
pigment  stripes  which  are  therefore  relatively  large.  Kahl  states 
that  typically  there  is  but  one  micronucleus.  I  have  found  some 
collections  with  symbiotic  chlorellae.  This  species  is  reported  from 
brackish  or  salt  water,  but  I  have  repeatedly  found  animals  corres- 
ponding to  its  description  in  fresh  water.  The  fresh  water  form 


336  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

may  be  a  different  species,  as  Penard  (1922)  first  suggested,  and 
as  such  may  deserve  his  designation,  S.  gallinulus.  Further  study 
is  required.) 

S.  amethystinus  Leidy  1880.  A  medium-sized  stentor  distin- 
guished by  its  violet-blue  color  and  the  fact  that  it  does  not  stretch 
out  but  remains  habitually  pyriform  or  conical.  Macronucleus  is 
oval  —  hence  the  only  medium  sized  blue  stentor  with  a  compact 
nucleus.  Symbiotic  chlorellae  are  present  and  with  the  pigmenta- 
tion often  produce  a  dark  colored  animal. 

S.  introversus  Tartar  1958.  A  medium-sized  (280  ^u)  blue-green 
stentor  distinguished  by  a  retractable  head.  When  withdrawn  the 
feeding  organelles  and  frontal  field  are  surrounded  by  a  lip  of 
folded  lateral  body  ectoplasm.  Endoplasm  is  brown,  combining 
with  the  pigment  to  give  an  olive-green  color  by  transmitted  Hght. 
Monihform  macronucleus.  The  holdfast  is  relatively  large. 

The  following  species  are  yellow  in  color: 

S.  niger  (Miiller)  Ehrenberg  1838.  A  medium-sized  (200/x), 
yellow  to  brownish  stentor  with  an  oval  macronucleus.  (Maier 
(1903)  states  that  this  species  has  myonemes  which  are  weaker 
(narrower?)  and  that  therefore  the  structure  of  the  kinetics  is 
more  easily  studied.  These  animals  do  appear  delicate  as  they 
wheel  slowly  through  the  water.) 

S.  felici  Villeneuve-Brachon  1940.  A  medium-sized  yellow 
stentor  with  moniliform  macronucleus.  (According  to  its  author 
the  yellow  color  of  this  species  is  not  due  to  the  granules  but 
resides  in  the  cytoplasm.  I  think  this  is  to  be  questioned,  since  in 
all  other  self-pigmented  species  the  granules  are  pigmented,  and 
she  remarked  that  the  color  is  deepest  in  the  granular  stripes. 
S.  niger  at  first  appears  to  be  colored  throughout  the  ectoplasm  but 
it  is  the  granules  which  are  yellow.) 

The  following  species  are  small  and  pink  in  color: 
S.  igneus  Ehrenberg  1838.  This  is  a  tiny  (loo/x)  pmk  to  nearly 
colorless  stentor  with  an  oval  macronucleus.  It  may  have  chlorellae 
(Balbiani,  1893;  Johnson,  1893),  but  all  those  I  have  seen  were 
without  symbionts.  According  to  Johnson  there  is  no  oral  pouch. 
As  in  other  tiny  stentors,  the  pigment  stripes  are  few  and  relatively 
broad. 


SPECIES    OF    STENTOR  337 

S.  rubra  Bary  1950.  A  small,  pink  stentor  like  igneus  but 
distinguished  by  a  rim-like  margin  on  the  frontal  disc  exterior  to 
the  membranellar  band.  (One  wonders  if  this  is  merely  a  variety 
of  igneus.) 

The  following  species  have  no  pigmented  granules  and  appear 
white  by  reflected  light,  except  when  containing  symbiotic 
chlorellae : 

S.  polymorphus  (Miiller,  1773)  Ehrenberg.  A  large  (250 /a)  not 
self-pigmented  stentor  without  a  case,  usually  grass-green  with 
symbiotic  Chlorella.  (My  observations  confirm  Johnson's,  that 
this  species  is  probably  never  entirely  free  of  chlorellae  unless 
special  steps  were  taken  to  remove  them.) 

S.  roeseli  Ehrenberg  1835.  This  is  a  small  (140/x)  colorless 
stentor  which  lives  in  a  case.  Usually,  but  not  always,  the  posterior 
nodes  of  the  moniliform  macronucleus  run  together  as  a  rod,  or 
are  more  spindle-shaped  than  the  anterior  nodes.  (In  both  this  and 
the  following  species  —  muelleri  —  the  stretched  animal  shows  a 
much  attenuated  stalk  right  up  to  the  well-expanded  frontal  disc, 
hence  the  shape  of  an  uncoiled  trombone;  and  both  show  con- 
spicuous "bristles"  or  quiet  and  extended  lateral  body  cilia  near 
the  anterior  end.) 

S.  muelleri  (Bory  St.  Vincent,  1824)  Ehrenberg  1838.  A  medium- 
sized  (250 /Lt)  stentor  without  pigment  granules  which  produces  a 
thick  lorica.  The  cytoplasm  is  rather  brownish  in  color.  The  frontal 
field  generally  rests  at  an  angle  to  the  cell  axis,  hence  cala-like  in 
shape.  With  uniform  chain  macronucleus. 

A  stentor  with  dark  pigment  of  undetermined  color  because 
described  only  from  preserved  specimens : 

S.  pygmceus  Swarczewsky  1929.  A  medium-sized  pigmented 
stentor  with  an  abbreviated,  chitinoid  case  found  attached  to 
certain  Crustacea  (gamarids)  in  the  deeps  of  the  Baikal  Sea. 
(Apparently  the  case  is  used  chiefl)^  for  attachment  because  most 
of  the  animal  does  not  withdraw  into  it.  There  is  a  short,  monili- 
form macronucleus  with  4  to  6  nodes.) 

This  list  includes  species  recognized  by  Kahl,  as  well  as  the  new 
species  loricatUy  rubra^  Felicia  and  introversuSy  described  since  his 


338  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

publication.  He  also  allowed  the  species  Stentor  glohator  Stokes, 
1885,  though  questioning  its  validity.  Since  glohator  is  very  similar 
to  multiformis  {gallinulus?)  and  was  described  from  a  single  speci- 
men, I  do  not  think  there  are  adequate  grounds  for  admitting  this 
species.  Two  marine  species  unique  in  having  a  notched  membra- 
neller  band,  the  so-called  S.  auriculata  Kent,  1881,  with  a  compact 
macronucleus,  and  S.  auriculatus  Kahl,  1935  (auricula  Gruber, 
1884),  with  a  multinodal  macronucleus,  are  probably  variations  of 
the  same  species  (see  Andrews,  1948a).  They  have  been  shown  to 
be  not  stentors  at  all  but  to  belong  to  the  genus  Condylostoma^ 
because  they  have  an  undulating  membrane  and  creep  along  the 
bottom  as  well  as  attaching  by  the  posterior  end  (Faure-Fremiet, 
1936).  Also  with  notched  oral  band  is  a  non-pigmented  ciUate 
found  in  numbers  on  a  branch  of  Fucus  by  Silen  (1948)  who  pro- 
posed the  name  Stentor  acrobaticus.  This  interesting  organism, 
attaching  by  the  posterior  end  or  clinging  by  2  folds  of  the  lateral 
body  wall,  ghdes  along  cross-striated  filaments  apparently  of  its 
own  making.  Two  compact  macronuclei  were  stained.  This  is  a 
doubtful  species  because  its  contractility  was  not  notable  as  in 
stentors  and  neither  feeding  organelles  nor  lateral  striping  were 
described. 

Hence  there  are  about  1 3  known  species  of  Stentor.  This  number 
includes  quite  recent  discoveries,  suggesting  that  still  more  species 
are  to  be  found.  I  have  myself  seen  two  or  three  additional  forms 
which  do  not  correspond  to  present  descriptions,  but  I  would  not 
give  them  names  until  more  abundant  collections  are  available. 


CHAPTER    XIX 

TECHNIQUES 

The  unique  combination  of  qualifications  of  Stentor  mentioned 
at  the  beginning  and  displayed  throughout  this  review,  may  well 
have  intrigued  the  reader  with  the  opportunities  provided  by  this 
animal  for  an  integration  of  multiple  approaches  to  a  study  of  the 
life  and  structure  of  the  cell.  He  will  also  have  become  aware  of 
the  evident  gaps  in  our  knowledge,  and  the  need  for  pursuing 
provocative  suggestions  or  following  hints  in  the  literature  to 
demonstrated  conclusions,  as  well  as  the  value  of  confirming  and 
thus  securing  as  a  sound  foundation  many  points  not  yet  well 
established.  Above  all,  the  special  promise  of  the  Stentor  studies 
should  be  carried  to  the  level  of  theory  on  which  new  explanations 
and  general  principles  emerge;  and  for  this  task  all  the  many  past 
investigations  may  be  regarded  as  establishing  only  the  beginnings. 
It  remains  to  connect  the  potential  student  of  Stentor  with  this 
organism  through  an  account  of  methods,  which  are  themselves 
doubtless  capable  of  much  further  refinement  and  expansion. 

I.  Collecting 

Stentors  are  most  likely  to  be  found  in  large,  permanent  ponds 
or  lakes,  but  they  also  live  in  streams ;  and  the  outflows  of  sewage 
plants  are  not  to  be  neglected.  The  collector  may  equip  himself 
with  a  set  of  cream  cans  of  two-quart  capacity  and  a  kitchen 
strainer  fastened  to  a  long  handle.  Keeping  in  mind  that  stentors 
are  usually  attached,  one  gathers  with  minimum  disturbance 
samples  of  submerged  and  floating  vegetation  such  as  duckweed, 
Spyrogyra  mats,  and  dead  cattail  leaves  which  are  placed  in  the 
container.  More  vegetation  is  then  scooped  up  with  the  strainer 
and  gently  wrung  out  into  the  can  until  it  is  nearly  filled.  Attached 
and  loosened  stentors  are  likely  to  be  gathered  in  this  way,  with 
sufl[icient  natural  medium  to  start  a  culture.  Location  of  each 
sample  as  a  possible  source  should  be  noted  on  the  container 

339 


340 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


because  one  can  return  to  a  source  year  after  year  and  find  the 
same  species  of  Stentor. 

Returning  to  the  laboratory,  the  Hds  are  removed  from  the  cans 
to  expose  them  to  the  air.  They  are  left  to  stand  for  half  a  day  but 
no  longer.  In  this  time  the  stentors  will  swim  to  the  top.  If  allowed 
to  stand  longer  an  injurious  putrefaction  may  set  in,  or  worms  and 
water  fleas  may  take  their  toll,  for  stentors  do  not  appear  to  be  a 
dominant  form  like  parameciaor  hypotrichs,  and  persisting  cultures 
are  usually  not  obtained  by  simply  letting  the  samples  stand.  After 
a  few  hours,  stentors,  if  present,  will  be  found  near  the  surface 
where  they  are  gathered  by  pipetting  along  the  miniscus  and 
agitating  the  floating  vegetation  and  debris.  A  scraping  action  with 
the  tip  of  the  pipette  when  water  is  being  sucked  up  will  serve  to 
loosen  stentors  which  have  become  attached.  This  material  is 


Fig.  96.   Equipment  for  culturing  stentors. 


TECHNIQUES  34I 

transferred  to  a  caster  dish  or  other  shallow  container  and  examined 
for  stentors  under  low  powers  of  a  stereomicroscope.  If  stentors 
are  found,  the  whole  sample  container  may  then  be  rotated  for 
gentle  agitation  and  more  samples  poured  out.  A  portion  of  the 
original  sample  is  then  passed  through  filter  paper  of  medium 
porosity  which  will  remove  all  large  forms  and  pass  only  minute 
organisms  on  which  stentors  can  feed,  and  this  natural  medium 
can  then  serve  for  the  starting  of  cultures. 

If  stentors  cannot  be  collected  in  the  field  they  may  be  obtained 
in  mixed  culture  from  several  biological  supply  companies. 

The  next  step  is  to  select  stentors  out  of  the  sample  dishes, 
leaving  competitors  and  predators  behind.  For  this  purpose  micro- 
pipettes  are  necessary  and  the  ones  I  use  are  made  from  narrow, 
polyethylene,  catheter  tubing  obtainable  from  surgical  supply 
companies.  This  and  other  items  of  culture  technique  are  illustrated 
in  Fig.  96.  The  tubing  is  softened  by  placing  it  across  the  narrow 
flame  of  a  wing-top  gas  burner  and  pulled  out  to  a  fine  point.  The 
degree  of  heating  is  critical.  If  too  cool  the  tubing  breaks  when 
pulled  and  if  too  hot  it  collapses.  One  can  expect  to  spoil  a  dozen 
pipettes  before  one  gets  the  knack.  When  good  tubes  are  drawn  they 


A.  To  the  right:  micropipette  (actual  size)  with  poly- 
ethylene tip,  rubber  tubing  "bulb",  and  glass  rod  plug;  as  well 
as  fine  wire  (bent)  used  when  cleaning.  To  left:  drawing  out 
polyethylene  catheter  tubing  over  wing-top  burner  for  pipette 

tips. 

B.  Glass  block  cell  containing  i  ml  in  which  all  specimens  are 

clearly  visible. 

C.  Culture  in  jar  with  hole  punched  in  cap,  examined  briefly 
with  spotlight  and  magnifying  glass  to  follow  development  of  a 

culture. 

D.  Development  of  clones.  Single  stentor  first  introduced 
into  one  cell  of  deep  depression  slide;  transferred  to  test  tube 
when  multiplied  to  about  25  animals;  transferred  again  from 
hundreds  in  the  test-tube  to  a  cotton-plugged  Ehrlenmeyer 
flask.    Filtered  culture  medium  plus  culture  of  food  organisms 

used  throughout. 

E.  Migration  tube  for  obtaining  clean  stentors.  Main  body 
of  half-inch  diameter  tube  is  covered  with  black  plastic 
electrician's  tape  and  filled  with  clean  water.  Concentrated 
S.  coeruleus  introduced  at  {x)  will  migrate  away  from  lighted  end 

and  are  recovered,  clean,  at  other  end  {y). 


342  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

are  cut  off  to  proper  length  and  diameter  with  scissors  and  a  piece 
of  thick-walled  rubber  tubing,  plugged  with  glass  rod,  slipped  on  as 
a  bulb  which  will  not  be  over-responsive  to  pressure  of  the  fingers. 
These  pipettes  are  unbreakable  and  can  be  used  for  years  if  cleaned 
out  occasionally  by  passing  a  twirling  fine  wire  through  the  points. 

Sample  dishes  are  now  searched  and  individual  stentors  picked 
up  and  transferred  to  glass  block  cells,  one  for  each  species  if 
desired.  About  50  stentors  of  a  kind  should  be  isolated,  if  available, 
and  the  isolation  dish  should  then  be  surveyed,  this  time  to 
pipette  out  any  contaminating  organisms  that  may  have  been 
carried  over  with  the  stentors.  Block  cells  or  their  equivalent  are 
recommended  because  in  them  no  organism  escapes  from  view. 

Enemies  of  Stentor  and  reports  of  their  predation  include  the 
following:  the  heliozoan  Actinosphcerium  eichhornii  (Cienkowski, 
1865)  5  the  water  plant  Utrichularia  which  captures  and  kills  stentors 
in  its  unique  bladders  (Hegner,  1926);  rhabdocoele  worms 
(Prowazek,  1904;  Gelei  1925);  oligochaete  worms  like  Chcetogaster 
diaphanus  (Lankester,  1873);  the  giant  ciliate  Bursaria  truncatella 
(Lund,  1914) ;  and  the  smaller  ciHate,  Dileptus,  with  its  proboscidial 
stinging  trichocysts.  I  have  observed  that  the  little  scavenger 
ciliate,  Coleps,  devours  injured  stentors;  and  nematodes,  water 
fleas,  and  hypotrichous  ciliates  are  to  be  excluded  as  predators  or 
otherwise  undesirable. 

2,  Culturing 

I  shall  now  describe  my  method  of  setting  up  cultures,  though 
this  is  not  the  only  nor  possibly  the  best  procedure.  A  half-pint, 
wide-mouthed  peanut  butter  jar  is  filled  to  a  depth  of  about  one 
inch  with  the  filtered  pond  water.  A  large  pinch  of  absorbent  cotton 
is  then  pulled  apart  to  form  a  loose  mesh  and  dropped  in.  The 
cotton  is  regarded  as  a  purified  substitute  for  pond  vegetation. 
The  isolated  stentors  are  then  washed  into  the  jar  with  a  squirt  of 
filtered  pond  water.  One  drop  of  skimmed  milk,  one  or  two  boiled 
wheat  or  rice  grains,  or  fragment  of  a  rabbit-food  pellet  is  then 
added  as  a  source  of  nutrients,  producing  a  population  of  bacteria 
and  tiny  flagellates  and  other  food  organisms  from  the  original 
pond  water  which  passed  through  the  filter  paper.  In  this  way  as 
many  seeding  stentors  as  obtainable  are  returned  to  the  same  water 
from  which  they  came.  Only  about  100  ml  of  starting  culture  is 


TECHNIQUES  343 

set  Up  in  order  that  the  stentors  may  themselves  possibly  regulate 
the  medium  to  their  Hking;  and  very  little  nutrient  is  at  first  added, 
in  proportion  to  the  few  stentors  present. 

Progress  of  the  starting  culture  can  then  easily  be  followed  by 
placing  the  jar  briefly  in  front  of  a  bright  spotlight  and  examining 
with  a  magnifying  glass.  At  the  end  of  a  week,  if  the  stentors  are 
multiplying,  more  nutrient  is  added,  at  first  only  a  drop  or  two  of 
skimmed  milk,  but  only  if  the  water  has  become  clear.  If  turbid 
with  uneaten  flagellates  and  bacteria,  the  jar  is  let  stand  another 
week  before  nutrifying.  Since  milk  is  a  complex  mixture  forming 
a  nearly  perfect  food,  it  serves  as  a  good  basic  nutrient  and  ionic 
medium  for  stentors  and  a  variety  of  other  protozoa,  including  of 
course  the  food  organisms  (Tartar,  1950). 

As  the  stentors  increase  in  number,  more  lake  or  other  natural 
water  which  has  been  passed  through  a  Millipore  filter  to  remove 
all  protozoa  and  their  cysts  is  introduced  from  a  stock  jar,  with  a 
little  more  cotton.  Eventually  the  culture  jar  will  be  filled  to  the 
top  and  can  be  nutrified  once  a  week  with  5  or  6  drops  of  skimmed 
milk.  (Cream  content  would  form  a  film  on  top  and  exclude  the 
air.)  From  the  beginning  the  jar  is  covered  with  its  original  cap,  in 
the  center  of  which  is  punched  one  hole  with  a  large  nail  or  ice 
pick,  the  cap  preventing  contamination  and  evaporation  and  the 
hole  allowing  gaseous  exchange. 

Such  cultures  will  remain  in  thriving  condition  for  many  months. 
If  removal  of  detrimental  cohabitants  was  unsatisfactory,  or  if 
hypotrichs,  nematodes,  etc.,  should  later  infest  the  culture,  one 
has  to  begin  again,  treating  the  culture  as  if  it  were  a  pond  sample 
and  isolating  stentors  as  before.  A  cardinal  precaution  is  never  to 
over-nutrify  the  culture  so  that  a  distinctly  putrid  condition  arises. 
In  the  course  of  months  the  stentors  may  diminish  in  abundance 
in  spite  of  the  regular  additions  of  milk.  When  this  occurs  it  is 
assumed  that  the  water  should  be  changed.  Since  the  stentors  are 
mostly  attached  to  the  sides  and  the  cotton  fibers,  the  whole  jar 
can  be  gently  emptied,  or  the  cotton  can  be  retained,  and  then 
immediately  filled  with  filtered  water  .In  the  meantime  the  stentors 
have  remained  attached  to  the  sides  and  are  protected  by  a  fluid 
film.  In  spite  of  some  loss  there  will  probably  still  be  enough 
animals  to  handle  the  large  amount  of  new  water.  One  may  want 
to  add  less  milk  now  until  the  animals  become  plentiful.  A  con- 


344  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

tinued  source  of  food  organisms  will  of  course  have  been  retained 
in  the  film  adhering  to  the  emptied  jar.  It  is  well  to  have  three  or 
four  jars  of  the  same  stock.  These  can  be  developed  by  splitting 
the  contents  of  one  jar  between  two  and  refilling  both  to  the  top 
with  filtered  lake  water,  adding  more  cotton  as  needed. 

These  procedures  may  not  appear  elegant  but  they  have  served 
to  maintain  healthy  stock  animals  in  more  than  sufficient  abundance 
for  my  micrurgical  operations  continuously  for  8  years,  during 
which  not  one  of  lo  stocks  has  died  out.  The  same  method  has 
been  used  successfully  for  growing  coeruleus,  polymorphtis,  roeseli, 
and  introversus.  For  the  last  named,  skimmed  milk  must  be  added 
very  sparingly  and  never  when  clouds  of  uneaten  colorless  flagel- 
lates are  still  present.  In  my  experience,  the  cultivation  of  other 
species  like  niger  and  multiformis  is  attended  with  great  difficulties 
and  probably  calls  for  exploring  distinctly  different  methods. 

Temperature  at  which  the  stentors  are  grown  is  another 
important  factor.  Schwartz  found  that  stentors  do  better  at  lower 
temperature  than  at  higher  (io°  vs.  22°C).  I  have  found  that  in 
winter  the  culture  room  must  be  thermostatically  controlled 
to  avoid  wide  changes  in  temperature. 

Genetically  more  uniform  material  is  assured  by  developing 
clones  or  cultures  derived  from  a  single  individual.  This  is  best 
done  after  a  good  culture  of  the  wild  stock  is  obtained,  for  one  can 
then  use  filtered  water  from  the  culture  itself  as  a  starting  medium 
and  be  sure  of  its  optimal  nature.  First  one  should  develop  a 
separate  culture  of  food  organisms,  either  by  nutrifying  coarse- 
filtered  Stentor  culture  fluid  with  skimmed  milk  or  by  growing 
any  of  the  food  organisms  soon  to  be  listed.  Into  a  deep  depression 
sUde  holding  about  i  ml  is  isolated  one  stentor  in  a  small  drop, 
checking  at  once  that  only  a  single  animal  is  present.  Then  are 
added  5  drops  of  the  filtered  parent  culture  and  5  drops  of  food 
organisms.  The  slide  is  placed  in  a  moist  chamber  and  more  food 
organisms  can  be  added  as  needed.  One  should  of  course  start  with 
several  such  isolations  to  assure  that  at  least  one  will  be  successful. 
Further  addition  of  food  culture  may  be  necessary.  When  about 
25  stentors  have  developed,  the  contents  of  the  slide  are  transferred 
to  a  25  ml  test-tube  with  aluminium  cap  into  which  have  previously 
been  added,  at  the  bottom,  10  ml  of  food  organisms  and,  on  the 
top,  the  same  amount  of  filtered  parent  culture  medium.  When  the 


TECHNIQUES  345 

stentors  become  abundant,  the  test  tube  can  be  emptied  into  a 
culture  jar  which  is  carried  forward  as  described. 

Alternatively,  the  test  tube  with  its  clone  of  stentors  can  be 
emptied  into  an  Ehrlenmeyer  flask,  plugged  with  cotton  and  fed 
by  repeated  additions  of  food  organisms,  sub-culturing  when  the 
flask  becomes  filled.  Growing  the  food  organisms  separately 
prevents  over-nutrification  and  is  therefore  recommended  for 
developing  clones  as  well  as  for  producing  very  abundant  and  clean 
cultures  for  biochemical  studies. 

To  obtain  concentrated  animals  one  can  gently  shake  the  flask 
cultures  to  loosen  stentors  attached  to  the  sides  and  pour  the 
contents  into  graduate  cylinders;  for  at  first  the  oxygen  will  be 
uniform  throughout  and  the  stentors  (at  least  coeruleus)  will  rapidly 
sink  to  the  bottom  in  mass  and  the  overlying  fluid  can  be  decanted. 
If  it  is  now  desired  to  free  these  animals  from  most  of  the  food 
organisms  one  may  take  advantage  of  the  speed  with  which  most 
races  of  coeruleus  swim  away  from  the  light — or  perhaps  the  reverse 
in  the  case  of  green  polymorphus  and  niger.  Whiteley  introduces 
the  concentrated  animals  at  the  lighted  end  of  a  large,  horizontal, 
covered  tube  with  both  ends  bent  upward  and  filled  with  Millipore 
filtered  medium  (Fig.  96E).  Stentors  soon  migrate  to  the  lighted 
end,  leaving  the  slower  bacteria  and  food  organisms  behind,  and 
are  promptly  removed  for  study. 

Other  methods  which  have  successfully  been  employed  for  the 
cultivation  of  stentors  will  now  be  reviewed.  First  we  have  to 
consider  the  basic  fluid  medium.  Distilled  w^ater  is  not  used 
because  it  is  injurious  and  tap  water  is  avoided  because  it  picks  up 
metals  in  the  pipes  and  may  be  chlorinated.  Natural  waters  from 
ponds  and  lakes  are  preferred.  They  may  be  freed  from  contaminat- 
ing organisms  either  by  previous  boiling  or  by  fine-filtering  —  the 
latter  is  recommended.  These  waters  will  contain  dissolved  sub- 
stances natural  to  the  Stentor  habitat,  but  many  investigators 
recommend  the  addition  of  a  mixture  of  inorganic  salts.  (I  attempt 
to  supply  these  along  with  organic  materials  in  the  added  milk.) 
Peters  (1904)  in  particular  emphasized  the  importance  of  the  salt 
content  of  the  medium  and  suggested  the  following  mixture, 
figures  representing  moles  of  the  salts:  CaCU  (0-0005),  K2HPO4 
(0-00015),  NaNOa  (0-00015),  and  MgS04  (0-00015).  This  solution 


346  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

was  used  in  the  ratio  of  500  ml  of  salt  solution  to  3500  ml  of 
culture  water.  The  calcium  was  especially  important.  Chalkley's 
solution  for  amoebas  (NaCl,  o-ig;  KCl,  o-oo4g;  CaCl2,  0'Oo6g, 
and  1000  ml  glass  distilled  water)  has  also  been  used  (Randall  and 
Jackson,  1958),  and  Hetherington  (1932b)  suggested  0-06% 
artificial  sea  water.  Uhlig  (unpublished)  found  that  the  addition 
of  soil  extract  and  Knop's  solution  in  equal  parts  produced 
excellent  cultures  of  coeruleiis.  The  formula  for  Knop's  is:  MgS04, 
0-25  g;  CaNOs,  o-ig;  K2PO4,  o-i2g;  KCl,  oi2g;  FeCls,  trace; 
and  1000  ml  of  distilled  water.  In  all  these  additives  the  guiding 
principle  is  of  course  that  essential  ions  and  elements  should  be 
supplied  in  surplus. 

Stentor  polymorphus  has  been  cultured  in  soil  extract 
(HammerHng,  1946)  or  o-oi%  Benecke's  solution  (Schulze,  1951) 
with  the  green  alga  Gonium  tetras  as  food.  Randall  and  Jackson 
grew  these  stentors  in  Chalkley's  solution  with  added  gel  from 
wheat  grains  boiled  in  the  same.  Sleigh  (1956)  grow  polymorphus 
in  a  basic  medium  each  liter  of  which  contained  inorganic  salts 
measured  in  millimoles  as  follows:  NaCl  (1-4),  KCl  (0-05), 
NaHCOs  (0-045),  CaCl2  (0-035)  and  CaH4(P04)2.H20  (0-006), 
made  up  in  distilled  water  of  about  pH  6-8.  This  solution  was 
nutrified  with  wheat  grains  and  the  stentors  were  fed  Chilomonas. 

These  cultures  are  to  be  kept  in  the  light  if  the  stentors  bear 
symbiotic  chlorellae,  but  too  bright  an  illumination  is  undesirable. 
The  observation  that  polymorphus  undergoes  fission  only  at  night 
(Hammerling,  1946)  suggests  the  possibility  of  obtaining  simul- 
taneous division  in  well-fed  mass  cultures  transferred  from  light 
to  darkness. 

To  the  basic  fluid  medium  may  be  added  nutrient  materials  on 
which  bacteria  and  other  food  organisms  can  live.  Hay  and  hay 
infusions  have  not  been  found  satisfactory,  perhaps  because  the 
culture  becomes  too  acidic.  The  hydrogen  ion  concentration  should 
fall  between  6-2  and  8-o  (Strom,  1926;  Belda  and  Bowen,  1940). 
Prowazek  (1904)  used  lettuce  leaves  but  he  found  that  his  cultures 
went  through  periodic  depressions.  The  same,  or  lettuce  extract 
if  cleaner  cultures  are  desired,  was  recommended  by  Belda  and 
Bowen.  They  remarked  that  cultures  should  be  grown  in  a  darkened 
place  because  growth  is  not  satisfactory  where  abundant  green 


TECHNIQUES  347 

algas  develop,  and  I  can  confirm  this.  As  nutrient,  Stolte  (1922) 
used  the  scum  from  lettuce  infusions,  or  beef  extract.  He  found 
the  presence  of  algae  useful,  but  I  think  this  was  because  his  cul- 
tures were  quite  putrid  or  over-rich  and  therefore  oxygen  deficient. 
Wheat  and  barley  grains,  boiled  to  prevent  germination,  are 
satisfactory  (Hyman,  1925,  193 1;  Weisz,  1948c).  The  addition  of 
dry  leaves  and  reeds  was  recommended  by  Peters  and  I  have 
simulated  this  by  adding  desiccated  lettuce,  but  without 
conspicuous  advantage. 

Stentors  are  to  be  provided  with  food  organisms.  Very  likely 
stentors  can  accumulate  and  ingest  bacteria  but  the  eating  of  larger 
organisms  should  be  more  efficient.  The  following  organisms  have 
been  observed  to  be  eaten  and  digested  by  stentors: 

Colpidium 

Blepharisma 

Paramecium  hursaria 

Minoidium,  and  other  colorless  flagellates 

Small  rotifers 

Chilomonas 

Halteria 

Tetrahymena 

Glaucoma 

Gonium^  and  other  colored  flagellates. 
With  the  least  trouble,  cultures  can  be  inoculated  with  these 
organisms,  but  for  cleaner  and  more  abundant  cultures  the  food 
organisms  should  be  grown  separately.  Burnside  (1929)  fed 
coeriileus  on  Halteria  grown  separately  with  hay  or  malted  milk. 
Constant  cultures  fed  with  Colpidium  were  set  up  by  Hetherington 
(1932a).  Schwartz  (1935)  grew  his  animals  in  filtered  pond  water 
plus  soil  extract  and  fed  them  on  Colpidium  grown  separately  in  a 
0-03%  solution  of  yeast  extract.  Chilomonas  with  Paramecium  were 
recommended  as  food  by  Turner  and  Brandwein  (1937).  Stentors 
cannot  readily  capture  Paramecium  caudatum  so  that  smaller  and 
less  vigorous  species  are  recommended.  Gerstein  (1937)  and 
Dawson  (1953)  used  Blepharisma  grown  separately  and  obtained 
long-enduring  cultures.  I  also  found  Blepharisma  to  be  excellent 
food;  but  the  pigment  of  this  ciliate  has  a  photodynamic  action 
(Giese,  1957)  which  might  prove  damaging  under  bright  illumina- 
tion during  operations  on  stentors  which  have  ingested  them. 


348  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

3.  Survival  on  slides 

Although  Balbiani  (1889)  reported  keeping  one  stentor  alive  on 
a  slide  for  nearly  a  month  with  feeding,  most  students  since 
Johnson  have  found  that  stentors  isolated  into  a  few  drops  or  even 
into  watch  glasses  do  not  long  survive.  In  fact,  one  gains  the 
impression  that  the  results  of  many  investigations  may  have  been 
compromised  by  poor  survival  on  slides  and  the  unfavorable 
conditions  this  implies.  We  have  noted,  however,  that  stentors 
will  multiply  and  clones  can  be  started  in  deep  depression  slides 
containing  only  about  i  ml.  Hetherington  (1932b)  was  able  to 
maintain  stentors  for  a  year  in  Stender  dishes,  a  few  dozen  to 
the  dish. 

Exploring  the  limits  of  isolation  culture,  I  kept  a  normal 
coeruleus  for  41  days  in  3  drops  of  medium  with  some  feeding  and 
two  transfers  to  fresh  fluid,  together  with  the  addition,  after 
3  weeks,  of  two  squashed  stentors  which  I  thought  should  supply 
what  stentors  need.  Experimental  animals  which  had  been 
operated  on  in  various  ways  survived  as  long  as  16  days  in  3  drops, 
but  as  a  rule  stentors  live  only  about  one  week  under  these  condi- 
tions. It  is  quite  possible  that  improvements  in  isolation  culture 
can  be  made,  and  the  advantages  of  adding  some  stentor  brei  is 
indicated.  In  any  event,  if  specimens  or  controls  do  not  survive 
for  at  least  two  days,  I  regard  the  experiment  unreliable. 

4.  Staining 

More  or  less  standard  methods  have  been  used  for  the  cytological 
study  of  stentors,  and  suggestions  regarding  fixation  and  staining 
are  given  in  the  papers  of  Johnson  (1893),  Schwartz  (1935), 
Randall  and  Jackson  (1958)  and  especially  of  Weisz  (1949a,  1950a). 
Diff"ering  from  most  other  ciliates,  stentors  have  not  revealed  a 
neat  silver-line  system  either  by  the  wet  or  dry  methods  of  silver 
staining  (Villeneuve-Brachon,  1940;  Weisz,  1949a).  Merton  (1932) 
made  a  valiant  effort  to  fix  and  stain  stentors  in  the  extended  state, 
but  I  am  inclined  to  agree  with  Johnson  that  semi-contracted 
animals  are  good  enough  for  most  purposes.  To  see  the  form  of 
extended  stentors  living  animals  are  the  best.  Treatments  which 
have  been  used  for  anaesthetizing  the  contractile  elements  have 
already  been  discussed  in  Chapter  XIV. 


TECHNIQUES  349 

5.  Cutting  methods 

The  simplest  way  of  obtaining  Stentor  fragments  is  to  shake  the 
animals  briefly  but  vigorously  in  a  tiny  vial.  Presumably  formation 
and  breaking  of  bubbles  adjacent  to  the  cells  splits  them  into  pieces. 
This  was  the  method  first  used  by  Lillie  (1896)  who  well  knew 
that  cleaving  eggs  can  be  separated  into  their  blastomeres  in  this 
manner.  If  a  few  bits  of  broken  cover  glass  are  added  to  the  vial, 
random  cutting  occurs.  For  more  precise  hand  sectioning  needles 
are  used.  Steel  needles  trimmed  and  sharpened  to  a  very  fine  point 
were  used  by  Prowazek,  Schwartz,  and  Weisz.  I  employ  only  glass 
needles,  made  by  holding  the  ends  of  two  glass  rods  in  a  small  gas 
or  alcohol  torch  flame  until  they  fuse  together  lightly  and  form 
a  ball  of  molten  glass  between,  whereupon  the  rods  are  quickly 
separated  as  they  are  withdrawn  from  the  flame  and  one  or  two 
good  needles  are  produced.  The  puUing  must  be  done  at  just  the 
right  time,  w^hen  the  glass  is  neither  too  fluid  nor  too  congealed, 
and  this  requires  practice.  The  glass  rod  should  be  of  soft  glass. 
I  do  not  know  the  specifications,  but  if  success  is  not  attained  one 
should  try  a  diflFerent  stock.  When  properly  made  (Fig.  97A)  glass 
needles  provide  the  finest  points  obtainable  and  are  used  like  a 
knife  in  cutting.* 

In  earlier  days,  ciliates  were  cut  without  quieting  by  merely 
confining  them  to  a  tiny  drop,  beside  which  a  large  drop  of 
medium  was  placed,  quickly  to  be  flooded  into  the  small  one 
immediately  after  the  operation  to  prevent  drying  (Balbiani,  1889). 
The  best  quieting  agent  is  a  solution  of  methyl  cellulose  which 
greatly  retards  stentors  by  its  high  viscosity.  This  method  was 
introduced  by  Marsland  (1943)  for  paramecia  and  later  adopted 
for  stentor  experiments  by  Weisz  (1951a).  The  solution  seems  more 
innocuous  for  stentors  than  for  paramecia,  and  I  noticed  that  it 
quickly  kills  Blepharisma.  Sleigh  (1956),  in  his  studies  of  ciliary 
coordination,  found  that  methyl  cellulose  is  entirely  reversible  in 
its  eff"ect;  and  I  kept  coeruleus  for  two  days  in  a  thick  solution 
w^ithout  apparent  injury  to  the  animals.  Nevertheless,  methyl 
cellulose  treatment  sometimes  showed  an  inhibiting  influence  on 
early  primordium  formation  (Tartar,   1958c).  Early  dividers  in 

*Uhlig  (i960)  used  a  Spemann  pipette  to  remove  ectoplasm  of  the 
fission  line  bit  by  bit  to  produce  doublets  by  aborted  division. 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Fig.  97.   Equipment  for  operations  on  stentors. 

A.  Glass  needle  drawn  from  soft  glass  rod  for  cutting; 
eyelash    fastened    to    handle    for    rolling    over    specimens    to 

examine  all  sides  when  following  operated  animals. 

B.  Moist  chamber,  a  plastic  sandwich  box  with  wet  filter 
paper  on  the  bottom  and  depression  slides  stacked  on  2  bridges. 

C.  Bench  for  operating.  As  he  bends  over  microscope, 
operator  automatically  presses  hinge  at  edge  which  turns  on 
spring  switch  and  embryological  lamp.  Bench  top  used  for  arm 
rests.  Ordinary  blue  light  below  hole  in  bench  is  used  in 
searching  culture  samples  by  transmitted  light.    Both  sources 

of  illumination  have  glass  heat  filters. 

D.  Canning  funnel  covered  with  drum-head  of  fine  bolting 
silk  and  immersed  in  culture  jar,  for  maintaining  large  fusion 

masses  under  optimum  conditions. 

E.  Operating  slide  to  which  a  square  of  finely  woven  fabric  is 
applied  with  melted  paraflSn  carries  large  drop  of  methyl 
cellulose  into  which  stentors  have  been  introduced  with  the 

micropipette. 


TECHNIQUES  351 

Stage  I  and  even  occasionally  at  stage  2  resorbed  the  primordium 
if  they  were  kept  too  long  in  the  viscous  fluid,  and  regenerators 
either  did  likewise  or  the  anlage  was  considerably  delayed  in  its 
appearance.  After  cutting  in  methyl  cellulose  the  animals  should 
therefore  be  washed  once  by  passing  them  through  a  large  drop  of 
filtered  culture  medium.  Old  solutions  had  a  greater  inhibiting 
effect  so  that  it  is  well  not  to  employ  dissolved  methyl  cellulose 
which  has  been  kept  longer  than  two  months.  A  stock  solution  of 
methyl  cellulose  may  be  prepared  in  the  following  manner:  add 
50  ml  of  dry  methyl  cellulose  to  the  same  amount  of  boiling 
filtered  lake  water  used  in  culturing;  stir  the  fibers  to  remove  air 
bubbles  and  assure  complete  wetting ;  remove  the  beaker  from  the 
stove  and  allow  it  to  stand  for  half  an  hour,  after  which  another 
50ml  of  cool  lake  water  is  added  with  stirring;  let  stand  overnight 
until  the  solution  is  cool  and  the  methyl  cellulose  thoroughly 
dissolved. 

My  method  of  operating  is  quite  simple.  I  use  a  stereomicroscope 
without  base  or  mirror,  because  the  instrument  then  stands  low 
and  the  bench  itself  can  be  used  to  give  support  to  the  arms 
during  deHcate  operations  with  the  needle  (Fig.  97B).  The  'scope 
should  have  the  highest  powers  available  (about  150  x),  which 
still  gives  sufficient  working  distance  between  the  lower  lens  and 
the  specimen  to  permit  operating.  Lower  magnifications  are  needed 
for  capturing  specimens.  Sub-stage  illumination  is  provided  by  a 
hole  in  the  bench  covered  by  a  heat  filter  glass  with  the  light 
underneath.  But  for  operating,  reflected  light  is  used  from  an 
embryological  lamp,  also  supplied  with  a  heat  filter.  It  is  con- 
venient as  well  as  saving  of  bulbs  to  arrange  a  pressure  switch  with 
a  strap  hinge  at  the  edge  of  the  bench  so  that  this  light  turns  on 
only  when  one  bends  over  the  microscope.  Reflected  light  has  the 
great  advantages  of  not  silhouetting  the  stentor  but  clearly  revealing 
its  entire  surface  topography,  and  of  avoiding  eye-fatiguing  glare. 

Using  a  toothpick  dip,  a  fairly  large  drop  of  methyl  cellulose 
solution  is  placed  in  the  center  of  a  piece  of  finely  woven  cloth 
stuck  with  melted  paraffin  to  a  thick  slide.  The  slight  roughness 
of  the  cloth  keeps  the  specimen  from  skidding  under  the  needle, 
as  it  would  on  glass,  thus  helping  to  hold  the  animal  in  place. 
Paraffining  prevents  spreading  of  the  drop.  A  white  cloth  is  used 
for  pigmented  forms  like  coeruleus  and  a  black  cloth  for  unpig- 


352  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

mented  species  like  roeseli.  A  thick  slide  is  easier  to  pick  off  the 
microscope  stage  than  the  common  thin  ones.  I  use  a  depression 
slide  turned  upside  down. 

With  a  micropipette  an  animal  is  then  transferred  with  minimum 
fluid  to  the  center  of  the  drop  of  methyl  cellulose.  The  stentor 
must  not  be  allowed  to  wander  to  the  surface,  for  then,  oddly- 
enough,  the  ectoplasm  will  adhere  and  tear  off  when  the  animal 
is  moved.  With  an  eyelash  fastened  to  a  narrow  handle  the  animal 
is  then  pushed  to  the  bottom  of  the  drop ;  reason :  a  glass  needle 
is  too  sharp  and  may  impale  the  specimen. 

The  glass  needle  is  then  taken  in  hand  and  after  gently  moving 
the  stentor  into  position  the  proper  cut  is  made.  With  practice  the 
needle  can  be  precisely  ''located"  under  the  microscope  so  that 
in  time  breakage  becomes  infrequent.  After  cutting  at  high  magnifi- 
cation, the  objectives  are  shifted  to  low  power  and  the  specimen 
removed  with  the  micropipette  and  placed  in  a  block  cell  with 
several  drops  of  filtered  culture  medium  to  wash  off  the  methyl 
cellulose.  Washed  specimens  are  then  transferred  to  two  large 
drops  of  filtered  medium  in  a  shallow  depression  slide,  the  code 
number  of  the  experiment  can  be  written  in  pencil  on  the  frosted 
edge,  and  the  slide  stacked  ''  pig-stye  fashion  "  in  a  moist  chamber. 
For  the  latter  I  use  plastic  sandwich  boxes,  the  bottoms  of  which 
are  covered  with  a  thick  layer  of  wet  filter  paper.  One  box  will 
accommodate  about  2  dozen  stacked  slides.  (Fig.  97c).  At  intervals 
depending  on  the  experiment,  the  slides  are  removed  from  the 
chamber  and  examined  by  reflected  light  under  the  microscope, 
moving  them  always  in  the  same  order,  stacking  them  then  in 
reversed  order  in  another  moist  chamber.  When  necessary,  the 
specimen  can  be  transferred  briefly  to  a  drop  of  the  methyl  cellu- 
lose for  close  examination  under  high  magnification,  rolling  it  into 
position  with  the  eyelash.  On  termination  of  an  experiment,  the 
drop  is  shaken  off  the  slide,  leaving  some  moisture  by  which  it  may 
be  rubbed  clean  and  dry  with  cheese  cloth,  and  the  code  number 
erased.  I  do  not  use  elaborate  cleansing  methods  because  these  are 
unnecessary  when  control  of  bacterial  flora  is  not  involved. 

My  experience  agrees  with  the  pioneer  observations  of  Gruber, 
that  healing  of  cut  surfaces  is  always  prompt  and  effective.  Even 
if  most  of  the  ectoplasm  is  removed,  the  remainder  will  stretch 
and  manage  to  cover  all  the  endoplasm  (see  Fig.  25c).  Defective 


TECHNIQUES  353 

healing  therefore  indicates  poor  material  or  conditions  of 
experiment. 

Intentional  disarrangement  of  the  stripe  pattern  is  illustrated  by 
rotating  anterior  halves  i8o°  on  posterior  halves.  The  cell  is  first 
cut  through  halfway  on  one  side  and  then  gently  rolled  over  and 
cut  through  on  the  other  side.  The  surface  is  thus  completely 
severed  but  the  two  parts  remain  joined  by  the  endoplasm,  the 
first  wound  healing  while  the  second  is  being  made.  Quickly,  and 
before  firm  rejoining  of  the  ectoplasm  occurs,  the  side  of  the  needle 
is  spun  around  the  anterior  end  causing  it  to  be  rotated  until  it 
takes  a  position  in  which  the  mouthparts  are  now  opposite  the 
primordium  meridian  on  the  posterior  half.  Within  a  minute,  firm 
healing  of  the  parts  in  their  new  orientation  will  have  been  effected 
and  the  specimen  is  ready  to  transfer. 

Regeneration,  singly  or  en  masse,  can  be  induced  by  brief  salt 
treatment  to  cause  shedding  of  the  membranellar  band.  For  indi- 
vidual specimens  in  a  drop  on  a  sUde,  I  add  one  drop  of  4%  urea 
solution,  rescuing  the  animal  as  soon  as  the  membranelles  are 
fimbriated.  Shedding  is  completed  in  a  large  drop  of  culture 
medium  to  which  the  animal  is  transferred  for  washing.  Regenera- 
tion is  easily  evoked  in  this  manner,  a  procedure  useful  when 
cutting  would  reduce  or  disarrange  the  lateral  striping. 

When  many  stentors  in  simultaneous  regeneration  are  required, 
the  following  procedure  is  followed.  Place  10  ml  of  Stentor  sample 
in  a  25  ml  graduated  cylinder  and,  slanting  the  vessel,  introduce 
drop  by  drop  and  with  minimum  turbulence  an  equal  volume  of 
4%  urea  (or  other  solution  having  the  same  effect;  see  p.  252). 
Contents  of  the  cylinder  are  then  poured  into  a  caster  dish  under  a 
dissecting  microscope  and  follow^ed  until  membranelles  begin  to 
be  sloughed.  Effective  time  and  concentration  of  the  salt  may  vary 
with  the  condition  of  the  animals.  The  dish  is  then  emptied  into  a 
tall  olive  bottle  or  100  ml  cylinder  and  quickly  filled  with  filtered 
lake  water  to  dilute  and  stop  the  action  of  the  chemical.  As  soon  as 
the  animals  settle  to  the  bottom,  the  vessel  is  decanted  and  filled 
again  with  w^ater  for  a  second  washing,  after  which  the  settled 
animals  are  ready  to  be  set  aside  or  used  in  experiments. 

It  may  be  mentioned  here  that  the  studies  of  Chambers  and  Kao 
(1952)  and  of  de  Terra  (1959)  demonstrate  that  injection  and 
autoradiographic  techniques  are  quite  feasible  in  Stentor. 


354  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

6.  Grafting 

Ciliates  may  be  said  to  graft  themselves  in  conjugation  or  fusion 
of  gametic  individuals  (e.g.  Metopus).  Heliozoa  reincorporate 
separated  pseudopodia  and  may  fuse  together  in  clumps  for  the 
purpose  of  digesting  large  food  organisms.  Doubtless  for  this 
reason,  heliozoa  vv^ere  the  first  protozoa  artificially  to  be  grafted, 
beginning  w4th  Cienkoweski  in  1865.  The  history  of  these  experi- 
ments, as  w^ell  as  the  generally  futile  early  attempts  to  fuse  amoeboid 
forms,  w^as  recounted  by  Okada  (1930)  in  connection  with  his  own 
experiments  of  this  type.  More  recently,  Daniels  (1951)  has  been 
able  to  fuse  giant  amoebas,  by  impaling  one  cell  on  top  of  the  other 
with  one  needle  and  breaking  the  cell  membranes  together  with 
another.  To  Gruber  (1885a)  belongs  the  credit  for  conceiving  that 
stentors  can  be  grafted  if  cut  surfaces  are  brought  together  quickly 
before  healing.  In  a  few  instances  he  was  briefly  successful  in 
rejoining  cut  stentors.  Unmindful  of  Gruber's  explorations, 
Morgan  (1901a)  forecast  Stentor  grafting  but  was  unsuccessful  in 
realizing  it.  Ignorant  of  both,  I  independently  succeeded  in  fusing 
as  many  as  4  stentors  together  (Tartar,  1941b),  this  possibility 
being  suggested  at  once  by  the  ease  with  which  two  stentor  halves, 
left  attached  by  a  small  strand  of  cytoplasm,  fused  together  again. 
That  grafting  should  be  successful  in  some  other  ciliates  is  at  least 
suggested  by  Prowazek's  (1901)  experience  with  one  Glaucoma 
scintillans,  cut  parts  of  diflPerent  individuals  being  temporarily 
united  under  a  cover  glass.  How  much  may  be  accomplished  by 
cutting  and  shifting  of  parts  in  forms  too  small  to  graft  is  shown  in 
the  excellent  experiments  of  Suzuki  (1957)  on  Blepharisma. 

The  method  of  grafting  was  explained  in  my  first  paper  on  this 
subject  (Tartar,  1953).  Using  the  cloth-covered  slide  already 
described,  two  stentors  are  placed  in  a  large  drop  of  methyl 
cellulose.  The  stentors  are  moved  quite  close  to  each  other.  Each 
animal  is  then  cut  with  a  sharp  needle  and  the  wound  surfaces 
opened  widely.  By  using  now  a  blunter  needle,  from  a  stock  of 
needles  from  which  the  fine  tips  have  become  broken,  one  animal 
is  pushed  so  that  its  gaping  wound  surface  is  brought  firmly  in 
contact  with  that  of  the  other.  An  extra  thrust  will  then  spread 
the  two  wound  surfaces  a  bit  so  that  the  temporary  membranes 
which  had  been  formed  over  them  after  cutting  are  broken  afresh, 
and  the  two  animals  will  then  fuse  firmly  together  (Fig.  98A). 


TECHNIQUES  355 

Adhesion  is  therefore  by  the  naked  endoplasm.  Sheering  of  one 
animal  against  the  other  promotes  fusion,  as  if  fibrous  proteins 
were  then  stretched  out  to  expose  free  bonding  points.  Even  if 
firm  union  is  achieved  at  only  one  point,  this  is  sufficient;  for 
fusion  will  soon  spread  throughout  the  whole  wound  area. 

Large  fusion  masses  are  produced  by  repeating  the  simple 
grafting  of  2  stentors.  To  a  fresh  cut  in  a  joined  pair  another  cut 
animal  is  added,  and  so  forth.  If  masses  of  50  or  more  stentors  are 
desired,  I  stop  occasionally  to  give  both  the  mass  and  the  operator 
a  rest,  washing  the  specimen  free  of  methyl  cellulose  by  transfer 
into  culture  medium  where  it  remains  until  grafting  is  continued. 
If  broad  adhesion  is  not  secured  and  parts  are  left  dangUng  or 
projecting,  there  is  likelihood  that  the  separate  individualities  will 
later  pull  free.  With  a  blunt  needle  I  therefore  poke  protruding 
heads  and  tails  into  the  mass  to  give  a  compact  form  with  uniform 
surface.  Large  masses  may  be  kept  in  a  fruit-canning  funnel  closed 
with  bolting  silk  to  permit  fluid  exchange  with  a  Stentor  culture 
in  which  the  receptacle  is  immersed  (Fig.  97D).  Pigmented  masses 
are  then  easily  found  and  pipetted  into  block-cells  for  examination 
under  the  microscope. 

To  graft  a  patch  of  ectoplasm  onto  another  stentor,  the  desired 
area  is  cut  from  one,  using  the  granular  stripe  pattern  as  a  guide, 
but  the  patch  is  not  entirely  isolated  and  the  remainder  of  the  cell 
is  now  used  as  a  handle,  impaling  it  with  the  glass  needle  and 
carrying  the  patch  to  the  host,  in  which  a  fresh  incision  has  just 
been  made  and  opened.  Adhesion  is  accomplished  by  pressing  the 
cell  remainder  into  the  cut  opening,  fusion  spreading  to  the  critical 
patch;  but  before  secure  union  is  eflFected  a  tug  on  the  cell 
remainders  orients  the  patch  in  place  and  excess  parts  are  then 
cut  off.  In  this  way  the  patch  is  grafted  in  the  desired  position 
without  injury  from  contact  with  the  needle  (Fig.  98B). 

Similarly,  if  stentors  are  to  be  grafted  as  heteropolar  telobiotics 
the  heads  are  first  cut  loose  like  the  lids  of  flip-top  boxes  and 
fused  by  thrusting  them  together,  whereupon  the  union  extends 
to  the  cell  bodies,  and  the  heads  are  then  excised  (Fig.  98c).  The 
bodies  of  the  animals  have  then  not  been  touched  with  the  needle 
and  their  individual  stripe  patterns  remain  wholly  normal.  An 
obvious  modification  of  this  procedure  is  used  for  making  head-to- 
tail  tandem  grafts  or  tail-to-tail  telobiotics. 


356 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Fig.  98.    Grafting  operations. 

A.  Producing  a  doublet,  a:  Two  stentors  are  split  down  the 
back  with  sharp  needle  and  opened  wide  to  expose  the  endo- 
plasms.  b:  With  a  blunt  needle  (broken  tip)  animals  are 
orientated  and  one  is  pushed  against  the  other,  exposed  endo- 

plasms  pressing  together,    c :  Doublet  stentor  resulting. 

B.  Implanting  a  cell  sector,  a:  Cuts  made  from  both  ends  to 
isolate  the  primordium  sector  with  or  without  nuclear  nodes, 
leaving  cell  remnants  at  each  end.   b:  Host  split  open  and  graft 


TECHNIQUES  357 

Different  species  of  Stentor  can  be  grafted  almost  as  readily  as 
individuals  of  the  same  kind  by  the  same  methods ;  and  in  most 
cases  enduring  unions  are  produced. 

7.  Minceration 

The  striped  ectoplasm  of  stentors  can  be  separated  into  50  or 
more  disarranged  patches  by  slicing  through  the  surface  with  the 
tip  of  a  needle.  After  repeated  cutting,  areas  will  be  circumscribed 
and  ''float"  free  on  the  endoplasm.  Further  transections  of  these 
patches  not  only  cut  them  in  two  but  drag  them  into  random 
positions.  Maximum  randomness  is  produced  if,  before  mincing, 
quarter  sectors  of  the  stentor  are  traded  —  by  transverse  and 
longitudinal  cuts,  first  rotating  the  anterior  half  180°  on  the 
posterior  and  then  the  left  on  the  right  half.  The  latter  operation, 
or  beginning  minceration,  will  render  the  animal  incapable  of 
directional  swimming  and  the  operation  can  be  continued  under 
optimal  conditions  in  a  drop  of  medium,  without  further  recourse 
to  methyl  cellulose. 

8.  Enucleation  and  renucleation 

If  stentors  are  to  be  enucleated,  abundant  animals  are  first 
isolated  into  a  caster  dish  and  left  to  stand  for  one  day.  The 
stentors  will  then  have  used  up  much  of  the  available  food  material 
and  will  be  largely  free  of  food  vacuoles  which  might  be  mistaken 
for  nuclear  nodes.  A  pellucid  stentor  is  transferred  to  a  drop  of 
methyl  cellulose  on  the  slide  with  black  silk.  If  the  position  of  the 
embryological  lamp  is  adjusted  so  that  it  overthrows  the  specimen 
a  bit,  the  nodes  of  the  macronucleus  will  appear  as  opaque  white, 
or  sometimes  glowing  bluish  bodies  against  the  dark  background 
(see  Fig.  79 a).  A  slice  with  the  glass  needle  from  the  upper  right 


put    in    place,    either    homopolar    or    heteropolar.     Posterior 

remnant  pushed  into  slit  to  fuse,  then  each  remainder  pulled  as 

indicated  to  orient  graft  as   fusion  extends  to  it.     Then  cell 

remnants  excised,   c:  Graft  in  placfe;  in  this  case  its  anlage  will 

be  caused  to  resorb  by  the  non-differentiating  host. 

C.   Head-to-head  telobiotic.   a:  Heads  of  two  stentors  cut  but 

left   attached   to   cell   bodies,     b:   Underparts   of  heads,    with 

exposed  endoplasms,   thrust  together,   then  excised  as  fusion 

spreads  to  the  main  bodies,    c:  Resulting  telobiotic. 


358  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

corner  of  the  stentor  to  near  its  base  is  made  and  the  two  halves, 
still  attached  at  the  posterior  pole,  are  spread  out  widely  (Fig.  99A). 
Thus  exposed,  the  nuclear  nodes  stand  out  more  clearly  than  ever 
and  are  rapidly  teased  out  with  the  needle  or  sliced  off  with  mini- 
mum cytoplasm.  All  this  can  be  done  while  leaving  the  oral  struc- 
tures entirely  intact.  When  all  visible  nodes  have  been  removed,  the 
two  halves  of  the  specimen  are  then  brought  together  in  normal 
location  to  aid  their  rejoining  in  normal  shape.  Then  the  posterior 
end  of  the  cell  is  split  apart  and  the  last  nodes  searched  for  among 


Fig.  99.    Enucleation  and  renucleation. 

A.  a:  Incision  to  enucleate  coeruleus  without  disturbing 
feeding  orgenelles  and  with  minimum  loss  of  cytoplasm,  h: 
After  cell  is  laid  open,  margins  with  macronuclear  nodes  are 
excised  or  nodes  teased  out.  c:  As  specimen  heals  together, 
posterior  end  is  opened  to  cut  out  remaining  nodes  obscured  by 

carbohydrate  reserves. 

B.  In  renucleation  with  nodes  from  same  or  a  different  species, 
enucleated  host  is  split  open  when  endoplasmic  sac  with  nodes 
is  available  {a);  the  sac  is  broken  against  host  wound,  the  endo- 
plasms  fusing;  and  nuclear  nodes  are  then  securely  inside  (c). 


TECHNIQUES  359 

the  granular  carbohydrate  reserves  which  tend  to  obscure  them. 
Soon  after  this  operation  the  stentor  will  appear  entirely  normal 
but  lacking  the  macronucleus. 

Comandon  and  de  Fonbrune  (1939b)  devised  a  method  and 
instrument  for  transferring  the  nucleus  of  one  amoeba  into  the  cell 
of  another.  Essentially,  the  nucleated  cell  is  pressed  against  the 
enucleate  one  and  the  nucleus  pushed  through  from  the  donor 
into  the  host.  In  Stentor  the  procedure  is  different.  A  healed, 
enucleate  specimen  is  returned  to  a  drop  of  methyl  cellulose  along 
with  the  donor  of  the  new  nucleus.  The  two  animals  are  brought 
adjacent  with  the  eyelash.  The  nucleated  specimen  is  then  cut 
open  as  described  and  one  or  more  macronuclear  nodes  are  teased 
out  of  the  cell  without  ectoplasm  but  within  a  thin  halo  of  endo- 
plasm.  This  endoplasm  quickly  forms  a  membrane  around  itself 
which  serves  both  to  preserve  the  nucleus  from  exposure  to  the 
medium  and  to  form  a  means  of  transfer.  The  enucleated  cell  is 
then  cut  open  and  considerable  area  of  free  endoplasm  is  exposed. 
The  free  sac  of  nuclear  nodes  is  picked  up  with  the  point  of  the 
needle  and  broken  against  this  endoplasm,  whereupon  fusion  occurs 
and  the  nodes  are  taken  in  (Fig.  99B).  Whole  macronuclei  can  be 
transferred  in  the  same  manner  with  minimum  endoplasm  if 
dividers  with  compacted  nuclei  are  used  as  donors.  Healing  of  the 
host  wound  firmly  traps  the  nucleus  within  the  cell.  Nuclear 
transfers  are  possible  between  different  species  of  Stentor,  and  it 
can  be  seen  that  the  foreign  nucleus  is  not  ejected  but  persists  in 
the  alien  cytoplasm. 

The  possibility  of  other  techniques  should  be  explored.  For 
instance,  it  would  be  desirable  to  find  a  non-toxic  agent  which 
would  permit  healing  but  prevent  intimate  rejoining  of  cut  edges 
of  the  ectoplasm  so  that  stentors  would  remain  as  cut;  or  to 
discover  a  means  of  agglutinating  stentors  so  that  they  adhere  by 
the  ectoplasm  without  fusing.  In  the  first  case,  would  a  mincerated 
stentor  express  multiple  individuality,  and  in  the  second  could  the 
impulse  to  primordium  formation  be  transmitted  by  contact  from 
cell  to  cell  ?  Possibly  stentors  could  be  grafted  by  drastic  methods 
not  involving  individual  handling.  I  have  tried  forcing  highly 
concentrated  coerideus  through  the  finest  stainless-steel  screens 
available.  A  few  fusions  were  made  in  this  way  but  not  large 


360  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

masses  as  hoped ;  for  when  the  openings  in  the  screen  are  smaller 
than  the  diameters  of  stentor  so  that  the  animals  are  broken  open 
when  passing  through,  the  wire  diameter  is  then  wider  than  the 
pores  so  that  the  emerging  streams  of  stentor  protoplasm  are  too 
widely  displaced  to  meet  and  fuse  immediately  following  disrup- 
tion of  the  cells.  Yet  these  remarks  may  suggest  to  others  more 
ingenious  approaches  increasing  the  possible  techniques  with 
Stentor  which  have  by  no  means  been  exhaustively  explored. 


CHAPTER    XX 

EXTENSIONS 

Having  in  hand  the  already  considerable  knowledge  about  Stentor, 
we  want  to  inquire  into  the  relevance  of  these  findings  for  general 
problems  of  the  organism.  At  present  we  cannot  expect  that  these 
bearings  will  be  more  than  suggestive.  For  sound  construction  we 
need  to  proceed  step  by  step  as  far  as  we  now  can  go.  Since 
physiological  and  biochemical  studies  of  Stentor  have  only  begun, 
the  discussion  will  necessarily  be  slanted  in  the  direction  of 
epigenetics,  or  morphogenesis  in  the  widest  sense. 

I.  Stentor  and  other  ciliates 

That  the  performance  of  Stentor  as  revealed  by  experimentation 
is  not  unique  may  be  shown  by  comparing  its  behavior  with  that 
of  Blepharisma,  the  only  other  ciliate  on  which  extensive  studies 
in  experimental  morphology  are  available.  Since  my  investigations 
and  the  remarkable  studies  of  Suzuki  (1957)  were  pursued  indepen- 
dently, paralleling  of  results  on  many  points  is  the  more  striking. 
Suzuki  reported  within  a  single  publication  which  deserves  to 
become  a  classic  a  series  of  experiments  encompassing  what  would 
seem  to  be  nearly  the  whole  range  of  possibilities  in  Blepharisma. 
Although  these  animals  were  not  grafted  as  in  Stentor,  and  are 
probably  too  small  to  permit  this  approach,  by  making  suitable 
incisions  in  single  and  dividing  animals  while  keeping  the  parts 
joined  by  the  endoplasm,  Suzuki  was  able  to  shift  these  parts  with 
reference  to  one  another  and  produce  a  variety  of  alterations  and 
disarrangements  closely  paralleling  several  of  those  which  have 
been  achieved  in  Stentor.  Cutting  and  enucleation  experiments 
completed  the  study.  Similarities  in  the  performance  of  Blepharisma 
and  Stentor  are  so  numerous  that  these  correspondences  might 
have  been  referred  to  repeatedly  throughout  our  discussions,  but 
I  have  chosen  to  review  them  together,  since  this  will  allow  the 
special  comment  which  is  called  for  as  well  as  reflecting  the 
independence  of  these  studies. 

361 


362  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

Blepharisma  is  also  a  heterotrichous  ciliate,  with  bands  of  (red) 
pigment  granules  lying  between  the  kineties  or  rows  of  body  cilia. 
Otherwise  stentors  and  blepharismas  are  notably  different  in 
general  aspect.  Blepharisma  is  scarcely  or  not  at  all  contractile,  has 
no  holdfast,  possesses  a  terminal  contractile  vacuole  and  cytopyge, 
and  has  an  undulating  membrane  to  the  right  of  the  mouthparts, 
paralleHng  the  peristome  or  row  of  membranellar  plates.  There  is 
no  obvious  gradation  in  pigment  stripe  widths  around  the  cell,  but 
posterior  to  the  mouth  lies  a  ramifying  zone  where  the  kineties 
bifurcate  in  multiplying,  especially  during  the  earliest  stages  of 
division.  Suzuki's  drawing  indicates  that  multiplication  of  clear 
stripes  begins  in  the  left  anterior  corner  of  this  V-area,  just  as  in 
Stentor.  This  region  is  also  the  site  of  oral  primordium  formation. 
A  groove  or  rift  in  the  ectoplasm  there  occurs,  and  anlagen 
development  shows  only  two  points  of  difference:  first,  the  pri- 
mordium separates  longitudinally  to  place  the  undulating  mem- 
brane on  one  side  of  an  oral  groove  and  the  membranellar  band  on 
the  other;  and  second,  the  anlage  is  apparently  always  parallel  to 
the  lateral  striping  instead  of  at  first  cutting  across  the  stripes.  This 
is  understandable  because  Blepharisma  has  no  frontal  field  and 
lateral  striping  therefore  does  not  need  to  be  shifted  forward.  The 
feeding  organelles  remain  deployed  longitudinally  on  one  side  of 
the  cell,  extending  from  the  anterior  pole  to  about  mid-body  level 
instead  of  being  shifted  entirely  to  the  anterior  end. 

Major  points  of  similarity  are  as  follows.  In  division,  the  fission 
line  is  seen  as  a  clear  band  from  which  pigment  granules  are 
missing,  as  in  Stentor,  and  its  position  is  determined  late  in  the 
division  cycle.  Indifferent  ectoplasm  blocks  the  division  furrow. 
Injury  apparently  causes  the  resorption  of  early  division  primordia, 
but  mid-stage  dividers  complete  division  after  excision  of  the 
original  feeding  organelles ;  and  if  the  division  furrow  is  destroyed 
a  divider  is  converted  into  a  reorganizer.  The  macronucleus  does 
not  necessarily  split  into  two  equal  parts,  for  in  cut  dividing  cells  a 
smaller  amount  is  received  by  smaller  than  normal  daughter  cells. 
After  mid-stage,  division  is  completed  even  in  the  absence  of  the 
nucleus  or  of  the  division  primordium.  If  only  the  nucleus  is 
excised,  completion  of  the  opisthe  shows  that  primordia,  in  what 
probably  correspond  to  stage  5  of  Stentor,  can  complete  the  oral 
differentiation.  Removal  of  a  substantial  part  of  the  membranellar 


EXTENSIONS  363 

band  may  incite  division,  as  seems  to  be  the  case  in  stentors. 

In  reorganization  the  old  mouthparts  are  resorbed  and  the  new 
membranellar  bands  join  with  that  of  the  old.  Micronuclear 
mitoses  occur  during  reorganization  and  regeneration  as  well  as  in 
division.  There  is  no  evidence  for  intranuclear  differentiation,  for 
all  parts  of  the  macronucleus  in  Blepharisma  as  in  Stentor  were 
capable  at  all  times  of  mediating  oral  regeneration. 

Ablations  of  other  than  oral  parts  does  not  result  in  regeneration, 
but  the  more  of  the  peristome  removed  the  sooner  regeneration 
follows.  Primordium  formation  is  therefore  inhibited  by  existing 
feeding  organelles.  Suzuki  attributed  the  possibility  of  anlage 
development  during  division  to  a  release  from  inhibition  by  reason 
of  partial  dedilferentiation  of  the  existing  feeding  organelles. 
Gullet  and  oral  pouch  also  become  vague  in  dividing  stentors,  but 
in  both  organisms  the  blurring  itself  seems  to  occur  only  after  the 
primordium  is  well  started. 

Nucleate  anterior  fragments  of  Blepharisma  behave  like  longitu- 
dinal aboral  halves  of  Stentor  which  also  lack  the  original  primor- 
dium site.  Regeneration  is  usually  much  delayed  yet  does  occur. 
Therefore  the  normal  site  is  not  indispensable  and  all  parts  of  the 
ectoplasm  are  equipotent  as  regards  anlagen  formation. 

Rotation  of  the  anterior  on  the  posterior  half  can  lead  to  the 
formation  of  doublets  and  doublet  animals  could  be  maintained 
through  a  series  of  divisions  lasting  a  month.  Like  parts  tend  to 
join,  as  two  cytopyges  coalesce  or  tandem  membranellar  bands  join 
together.  Induced  reorganization  occurs  on  one  side  of  a  doublet 
when  the  other  side  is  caused  to  regenerate,  as  evident  in  Suzuki's 
figure  38DC.  Without  grafting,  induced  resorption  of  primordia 
could  not  have  been  demonstrated,  but  if  one  type  of  induction  is 
possible  the  other  may  be  likewise,  and  blepharismas  may  also  pass 
through  states  of  activation  and  inhibition. 

Feeding  organelles  of  reversed  asymmetry  can  be  produced  in 
Blepharisma.  These  forms  were  apparently  the  result  of  the 
influence  of  a  posterior  pole  at  the  "  wrong  "  end  of  the  primordium, 
just  as  peristomes  with  mouthparts  at  both  ends  were  formed  when 
two  posterior  ends  were  present.  As  in  all  other  cases  of  feeding 
organelles  which  are  a  mirror  image  of  the  normal,  those  in 
Blepharisma  are  unable  to  feed  and  a  self-reproducing  biotype 
with  situs  inversus  cannot  be  produced.  Evidently  the  posterior  pole 


364  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

of  the  cell  induces  invagination  and  mouthparts  formation  in  a 
terminus  of  the  primordium  which  lies  in  or  near  it. 

Homopolar  primordium  sites  are  obviously  capable  of  forming 
anlagen  though  not  in  their  normal  position.  Heteropolar  pieces 
tend  to  creep  apart,  showing  that  their  polarities  are  intrinsic  and 
retained.  As  in  stentors,  heteropolar  primordium  sites  may  not  be 
activated  to  produce  anlagen  and  smaller  reversed  patches  may  be 
resorbed.  When  longitudinal  halves  are  rotated  upon  each  other, 
an  extra  primordium  may  appear  at  the  suture,  and  this  indicates  a 
possible  inductive  action  between  these  stripe  areas  as  at  loci  of 
stripe  contrast  in  stentors. 

The  chief  differences  in  morphogenesis  in  Stentor  and 
Blepharisma  are  now  noted.  In  the  latter,  Suzuki  speaks  of  an 
evident  ** growth  zone"  at  the  posterior  end  of  the  developing 
anterior  daughter  cell  which  forms  a  new  posterior  end  during 
fission.  Such  is  not  obvious  in  stentors,  in  which  Johnson  only 
indicated  that  something  like  this  increase  may  occur.  Possibly 
related  to  the  occurrence  of  this  zone  is  Suzuki's  finding  that  the 
oral  parts  in  Blepharisma  induce  V-areas  or  primordium  sites  in 
any  indifferent  region  lying  posterior  to  them.  Thus,  when  the  cell 
was  transected  and  feeding  organelles  shifted  to  the  side  opposite 
the  original  primordium  site,  a  new  site  then  developed  posterior 
to  the  displaced  organelles  and  doublets  were  produced.  This  does 
not  occur  in  Stentor  \  for  if  the  head  is  rotated  180°  the  anlage 
appears  only  in  the  original  primordium  site  and  a  new  site  is  not 
generated  posterior  to  a  displaced  mouth.  Also,  in  Stentor  doublets 
converting  to  singles,  a  primordium  site  may  be  obliterated 
posterior  to  one  of  the  mouths,  which  remains  intact. 

Doublet  animals  behave  differently  in  other  ways.  Removal  of 
one  set  of  mouthparts  did  not  result  in  regeneration  in  Blepharisma. 
Apparently  one  set  of  organelles  can  inhibit  anlagen  formation  in 
two  primordium  sites;  but  in  stentors  double  regeneration- 
reorganization  always  occurred  if  one  site  was  not  subtended  by  a 
set  of  mouthparts.  Blepharisma  doublets  could  not  remodel 
directly  into  singles,  as  stentors  do.  They  achieved  this  end  rather 
by  exaggerating  their  doubleness  and  splitting  apart  from  the 
anterior  end.  Hence  these  two  ciliates  exemplify  the  two  types  of 
transformation  to  singles  defined  by  Faure-Fremiet  (1948b). 
Finally,  it  may  be  noted  that  when  the  anterior  end  of  a  pre- 


EXTENSIONS  365 

divisional  Blepharisma  was  excised,  both  division  and  the  regenera- 
tion of  the  proter  proceeded  simultaneously,  contrasting  with 
Stentor  in  which  regeneration  of  the  anterior  daughter  is  always 
delayed  until  after  fission  is  completed. 

These  differences  are  minor,  though  instructive,  and  should  not 
be  allowed  to  detract  from  the  demonstration  of  a  remarkable 
similarity  between  the  two  ciliates.  In  both  genera,  micrurgical 
studies  show  how  important  is  the  pattern  of  the  ectoplasm  for 
the  course  of  cytodiiferentiation. 

In  the  manner  of  elaboration  of  cytoplasmic  structures  Stentor 
is  also  not  remote  from  other  ciUates  (see  Klein,  1932;  Tartar, 
1941b;  Faure-Fremiet,  1948b;  and  Lwoff,  1950).  Starting  with  the 
flagellates  from  which  all  agree  that  the  ciliates  have  evolved,  the 
general  picture,  as  developed  by  Faure-Fremiet  (1954),  seems  to 
be  as  follows.  The  centrosome  was  originally  developed  to  produce 
spindle  fibers  for  mitotic  division  of  the  nucleus.  In  flagellates  the 
centrosome  also  assumed  the  new  role  of  producing  an  external, 
fibrous  flagellum  and  its  associated  organelles.  By  delegating  this 
function  to  other  granules  (blephoroplasts)  derived  from  the 
centrosome  and  also  self-replicating,  the  number  of  fiagellae  and 
complexity  of  organization  could  be  increased.  In  ciliates,  the 
fibrogenic  granules  lose  their  morphological  association  with  the 
nucleus,  increase  greatly  in  number,  becoming  the  semi-autono- 
mous kinetosomes  which  produce  short  fiagellae  (i.e.,  cilia,  with 
the  same  fibrous  structure).  The  transition  form,  Opalina,  shows 
uniform  ciliation  and  there  is  still  a  certain  lack  of  autonomy  in 
that  the  basal  bodies  all  stem  from  one  or  two  generative  kinetics. 
But  the  large  population  of  kinetosomes  and  their  self-reproduction 
in  ciliates  provided  the  possibility  of  specialization  of  the  fibers 
derived  from  them  as  well  as  for  the  association  of  parts  into 
organelles.  The  organelles,  specifically  the  mouthparts  (and  in  the 
case  of  Lichnophora^  the  pedal  disc),  in  turn  become  in  a  manner 
themselves  self-reproducing  in  that  new  mouthparts  are  developed 
at  least  in  close  association  with  the  old.  But,  just  as  the  kineto- 
somes become  morphologically  (yet  not  physiologically)  indepen- 
dent of  the  nucleus,  so  the  oral  anlagen  became  more  autonomous 
and,  in  Stentor,  originate  far  from  the  preexisting  mouthparts.  A 
vestige  of  the  old  relationship  (as  when  in  Euplotes  the  new 
membranellar  band  always  forms  near  the  posterior  end  of  the  old) 


366  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

may  be  evident  in  Blepharisma  in  which  the  present  feeding 
organelles  induce  not  primordia  but  sites  for  primordia.  The 
eventual  evolutionary  development  therefore  provides  a  cell  cortex 
with  a  persisting  pattern  and  polarity  (not  labile  as  in  flagellates) 
as  well  as  semiautonomous  units  of  ectoplasmic  structure  whose 
organization  is  apparently  controlled  by  that  pattern.  Possibly  the 
greatest  persistence  and  fixity  of  cortical  pattern  is  to  be  found  in 
Paramecium,  which  cannot  remodel  a  defective  pattern  as  stentors 
do  and  rounds  out  the  contour  of  the  cell  after  an  end  has  been  cut 
off  only  by  subsequent  feeding  and  structural  growth  (Tartar, 

1954)- 

2.  Hypotheses  concerning  morphogenesis  of  ciliates 

A  cortical  pattern  in  ciliates  is  best  revealed  by  silver  staining. 
By  this  method  Klein  showed  that  the  surface  of  ciliates  presents 
a  network  in  orderly  relation  to  which  are  found  the  ciliary 
kinetosomes,  oral  structures,  and  other  ectoplasmic  organelles. 
Certain  fibers,  as  others  had  suggested,  are  probably  concerned 
with  the  coordination  of  ciliary  organelles  in  swimming,  searching, 
and  feeding  behavior.  But  Klein  (1932)  also  conceived  that  the 
ground  network  might  produce  the  ciliary  and  other  organelles  or 
at  least  guide  their  organization  into  specific  patterns.  Many  have 
differed  with  Klein,  on  the  grounds  that  certain  of  his  networks  are 
mere  sculpturings  in  a  "  dead  "  pellicle  and  hence  are  an  end  result 
rather  than  a  possible  cause  of  morphogenesis,  as  well  as  that  fibers 
do  not  produce  kinetosomes  but  the  reverse.  Klein's  work  has 
therefore  been  much  neglected  because  of  these  differences  of 
interpretation,  though  Gelei  (1936)  made  notable  contributions  in 
a  similar  approach.  Yet  the  idea  of  some  cortical  pattern  which,  as 
a  continuum,  affords  the  basis  for  integrating  all  ectoplasmic 
differentiation  and,  as  a  geometric  scaffolding,  provides  for  their 
orderly  deployment  has  endured  because  it  fulfils  a  logical 
requirement. 

In  Faure-Fremiet's  (1950,1954)  conception,  there  is  a  basic 
cortical  pattern  but  it  is  on  a  finer  level  and  consists  in  the  orienta- 
tion and  association  of  molecules  in  orderly  arrangements.  We  are 
therefore  provided  a  link  with  the  biochemical  basis  of  the 
organism,  structure  being  successively  compounded  on  pre- 
existing structure  until  the  visible  form  and  differentiation  of  the 


EXTENSIONS  367 

ciliate  is  achieved.  Important  among  these  derived  structures  is 
the  infracihary  network,  and  Faure-Fremiet  (1948a)  suggested 
that  this  pattern  could  be  viewed  as  a  morphogenetic  field,  tending 
to  recover  from  distortions  and  capable  of  regaining  its  equilibrium 
wholeness  following  excision  of  parts.  Doublet  ciliates  are  instruc- 
tive as  manifesting  doubleness  of  fields  in  balance,  but  any  dis- 
equihbrium  between  the  two  sides  leads  in  most  ciliates  to  removal 
of  structural  constraint  and  hence  to  remodeling  of  the  complex 
toward  the  single  form. 

According  to  LwoflF  (1950)  this  cortical  network  or  anisotropic 
field  would  tend  to  become  ''saturated"  with  kinetosomes  in 
certain  areas  where  we  observe  the  organelles.  If  still  more 
kinetosomes  are  produced,  these  would  be  left  free  to  produce 
their  own  field  or  be  guided  into  a  separate  field  which  would 
become  a  primordium. 

Although  evoking  an  ectoplasmic  pattern  on  the  basis  of  their 
orderly  arrangement,  LwoflP  stressed  the  importance  of  the  kineto- 
somes in  the  diflFerentiation  of  ciliates.  This  emphasis  naturally 
stemmed  from  his  classical  studies  with  Chatton  on  the  develop- 
mental cycles  of  apostomatous  ciliates  (Chatton  and  LwoflF,  1935a) 
indicating  a  genetic  continuity  of  the  kinetosomes  and  a  pluripoten- 
tiality  with  respect  to  what  they  produce.  That  is  to  say,  the 
kinetosomes  are  self-reproducing  and  new  ones  arise  only  by 
multiplication  of  others  preexisting;  and  daughter  granules 
elaborate  body  cilia,  oral  cilia,  trichites,  or  trichocysts,  etc., 
depending  on  how  they  are  determined  to  develop  by  their 
biochemical  surroundings  or  organizing  relations  with  respect  to 
the  patterned  cortex.  That  nucleated  endoplasmic  spheres  of 
stentors  entirely  bereft  of  their  ectoplasm  can  regenerate  neither 
the  structured  ectoplasm  nor  the  feeding  organelles  (unpublished) 
also  suggests  a  genetic  continuity  of  kinetosomes,  although  it 
cannot  be  excluded  that  the  morphogenetic  failure  of  these  spheres 
may  be  due  to  the  absence  of  normal  outer  membranes  which 
upsets  the  entire  "metabolism"  of  the  cell. 

Perhaps  the  best  evidence  for  division  of  kinetosomes  is  to  be 
found  in  the  work  of  Hammond  (1937)  on  Euplotes.  At  the  level 
of  the  division  furrow  the  basal  bodies  of  the  dorsal  bristles  were 
seen  to  increase  in  number  and  this  occurred  within  a  lengthening, 
sub-pellicular  tubule  which  would  seem  to  exclude  the  migration 


368  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

of  kinetosomes  into  this  area  from,  say,  the  nucleus  or  from  any 
other  source,  save  that  of  the  preexisting  kinetosomes.  In  oral 
primordium  formation  in  ciliates  in  general,  a  disorganized 
aggregation  or  "  anarchic  field  "  of  additional  kinetosomes  appears 
at  the  site  of  development.  If  these  in  fact  arise  from  multiplication 
of  adjacent  basal  bodies  of  the  lateral  cilia,  this  would  explain  the 
origin  of  the  "building  blocks"  or  structural  components  of 
organelles.  Yet,  as  Lwoff  said,  *' .  .  .  if  kinetosomes  are  necessary 
for  morphogenesis,  they  seem  not  to  'command'  but  to  obey 
some  mysterious  force  which  is  responsible  for  their  orientation". 
The  alignment  and  organization  of  kinetosomes  into  complex 
structures  and  determination  of  what  type  of  fibrous  elaborations 
these  granules  will  produce  thus  implies  an  additional  agency,  a 
pattern  of  "molecular  ecologies"  or  of  some  preexisting  ground 
structure  in  the  cortex. 

Working  with  Paramecium,  Ehret  and  Powers  (1959)  have 
challenged  previous  conceptions  regarding  the  genetic  continuity 
of  kinetosomes  and  the  importance  of  fibrous  networks  in  organiz- 
ing the  ciliate  cortex.  Briefly,  they  find  that  the  cilia  of  the  oral 
primordium  arise  not  from  kinetosomes  but  from  different  entities 
which  might  be  "microsomes";  and  they  conceive  the  unit  of 
cortical  structure  as  a  ciliary  corpuscle  which  usually  bears  one  or 
double  cilia  and  associated  elements,  the  close  packing  of  these 
spherules  producing  the  appearance  of  hexagonal  and  rhomboidal 
fibrous  patterns.  This  interpretation  is  contrary  to  that  of  Yusa 
(1957)  and  Roque  (1956)  who  retain  the  postulate  of  the  genetic 
continuity  of  kinetosomes  and  agreement  has  not  yet  been  reached, 
yet  the  revolutionary  conceptions  of  Ehret  and  Powers  at  least  have 
the  merit  of  keeping  the  problems  of  ciliate  morphogenesis  in  a 
fruitfully  flocculent  state.  The  crowding  of  cortical  granules, 
apparently  of  internal  origin,  into  every  available  space  in  the 
ectoplasm  of  Stentor  coeruleus  would  seem  to  offer  a  parallel  to  the 
packing  of  ciliary  corpuscles.  But  the  unextensible,  relatively  thick 
and  solid  ectoplasm  of  forms  such  as  Paramecium  and  Frontonia 
may  represent  a  special  and  peculiar  evolutionary  development 
(Tartar,  1954)  and,  as  these  investigators  grant,  it  remains  to  be 
seen  how  far  their  intriguing  ideas  are  applicable  to  other  ciliates. 
The  orderly  packing  and  morphogenetic  control  of  corpuscular 
units,   even   in   Paramecium,   would    seem   to   require,    as   with 


EXTENSIONS  369 

kinetosomal  orientation,  some  pattern  factor  in  addition. 

Specifically  in  reference  to  his  studies  on  Stentor  (Weisz,  1951c, 
1954)  developed  a  theory  of  morphogenesis  in  ciliates  involving 
three  postulates :  first,  that  self- reproducing  kinetosomes  represent 
a  hierarchy,  with  oral  granules  dominant  over  those  of  a  stomato- 
genic  kinety  or  primordium  site  and  these  in  turn  dominant  over 
those  of  other  kinetics  of  the  more  generalized  lateral  body  surface ; 
second,  that  this  hierarchy  represents  the  degree  of  ascendency  in 
competition  of  the  kinetosomes  for  their  "food"  or  the  special 
metabolites  supplied  by  the  endoplasm  from  biochemical  activities 
supported  by  the  macronucleus  which  they  require  both  to  grow 
and  to  maintain  themselves;  and  third,  that  the  kinetosomes  in 
turn  act  back,  enzymatically,  on  the  part  of  the  macronucleus 
nearest  them.  How  this  system  was  thought  to  operate  may  be 
illustrated  by  the  case  of  regeneration.  When  the  feeding  organelles 
are  excised,  the  upper  level  of  the  kinetosomal  hierarchy  is  vacated 
so  that  the  metabolites  can  flow  to  the  kinetosomes  of  the  next 
level  —  those  of  the  stomatogenic  kinety  or,  if  this  was  also 
removed,  then  the  next  adjacent  body  kinety  —  which  are  then 
able  to  multiply  and  produce  oral  cilia  for  the  anlage  of  a  new  set 
of  feeding  organelles.  Once  formed,  this  new  set  again  exhausts  the 
special  metabolites  for  oral  cilia  so  that  further  primordium 
formation  is  inhibited.  (In  division  and  reorganization,  the  oral 
kinetosomes  somehow  lose  their  competitive  ascendancy  so  that 
the  kinetosomes  of  the  stomatogenic  kinety  are  no  longer  held  in 
check.)  The  oral  kinetosomes  in  place  now  react  with  adjacent 
nodes  of  the  nucleus,  maintaining  their  capacity  to  produce  the 
special  metabolites,  while  those  far  distant  lose  their  capability, 
and  morphostasis  is  hence  stabilized. 

The  effectiveness  of  this  hypothesis  depends  upon  two  points : 
first,  that  the  postulated  metabolites  are  necessary  for  the  main- 
tenance of  existing  feeding  organelles,  and  second,  that  these 
metabolites  are  present  only  in  limited  quantity.  Only  on  the  basis 
of  these  assumptions  would  there  occur  that  competition  which 
would  explain  the  integration  of  the  organism,  e.g.,  that  it  never 
has  more  than  one  set  of  feeding  organelles.  Yet  I  do  not  think 
that  either  of  these  points  have  been  substantiated  by  subsequent 
studies.  The  formed  feeding  organelles  and  body  cilia  of  enucleates 
are  often  maintained  to  the  point  of  death  or  at  least  they  continue 


370  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

intact  for  a  whole  week  and  undergo  dissolution  only  just  before 
the  death  of  the  specimen  at  which  time  the  appearance  of  a  general 
necrosis  could  just  as  well  account  for  structural  disintegration.  I 
have  observed  nothing  like  an  intimate  nutritive  relationship 
between  the  nucleus  and  the  feeding  organelles  such  that  removal 
of  the  nucleus  withdraws  their  maintenance  and  results  in  the 
prompt  resorption  of  specialized  organelles.  In  fact,  the  failure  of 
excised  heads  to  reduce  the  feeding  organelles  to  a  size  propor- 
tionate to  the  small  fragment,  if  enucleate,  indicates  just  the 
opposite :  that  the  nucleus  is  necessary  for  the  resorption  of  formed 
organelles.  Nor  is  there  any  substantiation  that  the  hypothetical 
metabolites  are  present  in  limited  quantity.  Arguing  against  this 
assumption  is  the  fact  that  grafted  pairs  of  stentor  produce  one, 
two,  or  three  primordia  and  sets  of  feeding  organelles  regardless 
of  the  amount  of  nuclear  material  present;  and  grafting  of  an 
enucleated  stentor  to  a  normal  animal  may  lead  to  the  production 
of  a  doublet  just  as  readily  as  when  both  nuclei  are  present 
(Tartar,  1954).  Similarly,  if  the  fine-line  zone  of  a  stentor  is  split 
by  an  enucleated  meridional  patch  of  wide  striping,  three  anlagen 
of  normal  size  are  usually  formed  instead  of  one  (Tartar,  1956a). 
On  Weisz's  hypothesis  this  would  imply  that  the  single  animal  is 
quite  able  to  produce  three  "quanta"  of  oral  metabolites.  If  so, 
there  is  no  reason  to  suppose  that  an  intact  set  of  feeding  organelles 
would  monopolize  them  and  in  this  way  exert  inhibitive  action  on 
the  primordium  site.  The  additional  postulate  —  that  the  kineto- 
somes  act  back  on  the  nucleus  to  produce  internodal  differences  — 
was  also  not  confirmed;  for  in  later  tests  all  sections  of  the 
macronucleus  were  found  to  be  equivalent  (Tartar,  1957b). 

Form  in  ciliates  is  still  without  satisfactory  causal  analysis;  but 
this  is  no  wonder  since  no  adequate  theory  of  morphogenesis  of 
any  organism  has  yet  been  achieved.  In  this  perspective,  the 
progress  with  ciliate  protozoa  appears  promising  and  we  may  ask 
how,  if  eventually  successful,  a  verifiable  explanation  of  their 
development  might  be  pertinent  to  general  problems  of 
cytodilferentiation. 

3.  Stentors  and  cells 

First  we  shall  consider  whether  a  ciliate  like  Stentor  is  a  cell,  or 
properly  should  be  included  in  the  class  of  those  things  called  cells, 


EXTENSIONS  371 

and  therefore  whether  Stentor  studies  are  relevant  to  analysis  of 
the  potentialities  of  cells  in  general.  My  opinion  is  already  evident 
from  the  fact  that  stentors  have  throughout  this  study  been 
referred  to  as  cells.  This  follows  if  we  define  the  cell  as  a  packaged 
nucleo-cytoplasmic  duality  capable  in  some  degree  of  independent 
life.  We  can  allow  that  these  ''packages"  sometimes  may  have 
''holes"  in  them  connecting  to  other  packages  (cell  bridges),  and 
that  the  enclosed  nuclear  phase  may  consist  of  one  or  more  nuclei 
of  one  or  two  types.  These  units  may  be  wholly  free-living,  like 
Stentor.  They  may  be  autonomous  but  not  free-living  as  in  the 
case  of  parasitic  protozoa.  Or  as  tissue  cells  they  may  be  subject  to 
a  system  of  intercellular  reactions  leading  to  the  morphological 
and  functional  wholeness  of  cellular  organs  and  organisms.  Even 
in  the  latter  case,  the  cell  lives  a  double  life,  both  dependent  and 
independent,  as  one  of  the  authors  of  the  Cell  Theory,  Schleiden, 
remarked.  A  tissue  cell  is  dependent  on  the  organism  for  its 
sustenance  and  participates  in  multicellular  interaction  and 
organizing  relations,  yet  its  capacity  for  independent  life  is 
abundantly  demonstrated  by  culture  outside  the  organism;  just  as 
its  self-dependence  is  shown  by  the  fact  that  if  the  long  process  of 
a  nerve  cell  is  separated  from  its  nucleated  cell  body,  neither 
proximity  to  countless  nucleated  fellow  cells  nor  being  continually 
bathed  in  blood  plasma  can  save  that  nerve  from  disintegration 
after  its  nucleo-cytoplasmic  integrity  has  been  violated.  Indeed, 
the  study  of  somatic  deletions  in  Drosophila  has  shown  that  the 
absence  of  a  single  genetic  locus,  which  may  be  tagged  by  its 
correlation  with  yellow  color,  results  in  the  independent  death  of 
the  cells  which  lack  it,  as  if  all  the  nucleus  is  needed  all  the  time 
just  to  maintain  the  hfe  of  the  cell  itself  (Demerec,  1934). 

That  larger  organisms  are  comprised  of  multitudes  of  cells 
would  seem  to  imply  the  interaction  between  nucleus  and  cyto- 
plasm is  so  intimate  that  no  portion  of  the  cytoplasm  can  be  far 
from  an  associated  nucleus.  The  nuclear  phase  is  not  aggregated 
into  one  "gland".  Even  in  the  neurone,  in  which  the  cytoplasm 
may  extend  several  feet  from  the  major  cell  body  with  its  nucleus, 
specialized  organelles  —  the  neurofibrils  —  may  have  been 
developed  to  allow  nucleo-cytoplasmic  interactions  even  at  this 
distance  (Parker,  1929). 

All  grades  are  found  between  complete  independence  of  cells, 


372  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

as  in  free-living  protozoa,  and  a  total  dependence  which  might 
best  be  exemplified  by  the  anucleate  mammalian  red  blood  cell  — 
whose  fellow  traveler  in  the  blood  stream,  the  leucocyte,  is 
relatively  autonomous  and  practically  indistinguishable  from  para- 
sitic amoebas.  In  the  cellular  slime  molds  free-living  amcebas 
cooperate  in  forming  multicellular  fruiting  bodies.  What  remains 
constant  throughout  is  self-dependence  of  the  cell  as  a  packaged 
nuclear-cytoplasmic  duality  capable  of  some  degree  of  independent 
life. 

The  further  similarity  between  unicellular  organisms  and  tissue 
cells  is  found  in  the  fact  that  the  genome  of  protozoa  is  evidently 
just  as  complex  as  that  of  metazoa  and  their  tissue  and  germ  cells. 
Higher  organisms  do  not  have  larger  or  longer  or  more  numerous 
chromosomes  and  hence,  evidently,  have  not  a  correspondingly 
greater  number  of  genes,  nor  is  the  behavior  of  their  nuclei  more 
complex.  In  present-day  terms,  this  implies  that  the  protozoan 
nucleus  contains  as  much  "information"  as  the  egg  or  tissue  cell 
(Elsasser,  1958).  This  uniformity  suggests  that  the  nucleus  is 
concerned  first  of  all  with  the  life  of  the  individual  cell,  and  that 
in  multicellular  forms  there  is  developed  among  the  cells  another 
system  of  intercellular  reactions,  about  which  we  still  know 
practically  nothing,  which  provide  the  information  for  multi- 
cellular differentiation.  Evolution,  with  its  teaching  of  the  con- 
tinuity of  life,  leads  us  to  regard  free-living  and  tissue  cells  as 
basically  the  same,  multicellular  organisms  arising  either  by  the 
adherence  of  products  of  cell  division,  as  in  the  algae,  or  by  a 
partitioning  of  a  multinucleated  cell  into  a  multicellular  body  as 
seen  in  the  Accela  or  in  insects.  A  transcending  unity  of  all  cells, 
not  as  parts  but  as  expressing  what  Woodger  (1929)  called  the  cell 
type  of  organization,  certainly  provides  the  most  hopeful  heuristic 
principle.  This  does  not  exclude  the  possibility  that  protozoa  have 
taken  this  type  of  organization  to  extremes  of  multiple  specializa- 
tion of  the  cytoplasmic  phase,  or  that  we  can  learn  as  much  from 
them  by  contrast  as  by  comparison  with  other  cells. 

4.  Stentor  and  metazoa 

Stentors  elaborate  themselves  in  only  one  direction,  to  form 
another  stentor.  In  this  regard  they  are  like  eggs  but  lack  the 
multiple    potentialities   of   embryonic   cells.    Repeated   cleavage 


EXTENSIONS  373 

without  feeding  but  also  without  intercellular  differentiation  occurs 
in  some  ciliates,  as  when  the  large  form  of  Ichthyophthirius  pro- 
duces multitudes  of  small  forms  (Mugard,  1948).  The  beginnings 
of  cellular  differentiations  may  be  seen  in  the  formation  of  mating 
types  or  the  gametic  differentiation  of  some  ciliates,  as  well  as  in 
multicellular  stages  of  certain  Sporozoa,  the  Cnidosporidea.  In 
clonal  cell  cultures,  metazoa  are  being,  as  it  were,  reduced  to 
*'  protozoa  ".  And  in  Chcetopterus,  Lillie(  1906)  was  able  to  suppress 
cleavage  of  the  egg  and  yet  obtained  unicellular  embryos  of  fairly 
normal  shape  in  which  the  elaboration  of  ciUa,  with  a  particulate 
contribution  from  the  nucleus,  and  imprecise  segregation  processes 
led  to  a  fairly  recognizable  early  embryo.  Being  cytoplasmic  con- 
tinuums, Stentor  masses  are  not  multicellular  though  they  do  show 
the  emergence  of  new  capacities  for  morphogenesis. 

Another  major  point  of  correspondence  lies  in  the  cilia  and 
ciliation.  We  now  know  that  the  basic  structure  of  cilia  and 
flagella  are  the  same  in  all  organisms.  Many  animals  have  ciliated 
epithelia  and  in  these  the  joining  of  the  cilia  by  fibrous  connectives 
does  not  differ  fundamentally  from  that  in  ciliates.  Gruber  com- 
mented on  the  remarkably  similar  construction  of  the  membranelles 
of  Stentor  and  those  occurring  in  the  *' corner  cells"  of  certain 
molluscs,  notably  Cyclas  cornea.  Whitman  (1893)  used  this  corres- 
pondence in  argument  for  the  inadequacy  of  the  cell  theory  of 
development,  having  to  emphasize  at  that  time  the  neglected  and 
still  baffling  intercellular  organizing  relations  through  which  the 
separate  cells,  regardless  of  their  size  or  number,  are  formed  into 
an  embryo.  Stentor  makes  many  such  membranelles  in  one  cell; 
a  mollusc,  one  in  each  of  many  cells.  In  their  embryonic  stages 
many  multicellular  organisms  are  conspicuously  ciliated,  offering 
the  possibility  that  something  like  ciliate  morphogenesis  may  play 
a  significant  role  in  their  early  development.  In  the  shipworm  a 
silver-staining  material  is  segregated  into  specific  blastomeres 
(Faure-Fremiet  and  Mugard,  1948);  and  in  the  sea  urchin  certain 
cells  come  to  show  an  argentophile  network  with  apparently  a 
centrosome-kinetosome  in  each  cell  which  becomes  part  of  a 
ciliated  structure  (Mugard,  1957),  but  there  is  still  no  proof  that 
these  are  causal  factors  in  development. 

Embryologists  are  generally  agreed  that  development  implies 
an  initial  cytoarchitecture  in  the  cortex  of  the  egg  as  a  guide  for 


374  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

orderly  transformations.  Stentor  has  such  an  architecture  or 
cortical  pattern  which  is  even  visible  in  its  heterogeneity  in  the 
living  organism  and  therefore  can  be  rearranged  at  will.  In  dividing 
stentors  the  migrations  of  the  carbohydrate  reserves  mimics  the 
segregation  of  distinctive  ooplasms  in  certain  eggs,  while  in  the 
^gg  coat  which  Holtfreter  (1949)  has  shown  to  be  so  important  in 
embryogenesis  we  may  have  a  direct  descendant  of  the  ciliate 
pellicle.  We  are  reminded,  too,  that  Hthium  has  marked  morpho- 
genetic  effects  on  stentors  as  it  does  on  embryos.  Truly,  we  do  not 
know  which  of  these  resemblances  are  superficial  and  which  are 
fundamental,  but  no  possible  correspondencies  should  be  ignored. 

5.  Theoretical  considerations 

Before  the  nucleus  was  discovered  and  even  after  this  cell 
organelle  was  found  to  be  present  but  not  obviously  active  except 
in  reproducing  itself  at  cell  division,  the  emphasis  w^as  on  the 
cytoplasm  as  the  basis  of  life.  All  cytoplasms  were  said  to  have  a 
common  denominator  in  *' protoplasm",  a  semifluid  substance 
conceived  as  *' living  matter".  Of  this  view  there  remains  today 
only  the  fact  that  living  organisms  are  intimately  involved  with  the 
colloidal  state,  and  the  hope  that  all  living  phenomena  will  be 
explainable  in  terms  of  molecules  and  their  interactions.  With  the 
discovery  of  the  nucleus  and  its  importance  in  inheritance  the 
emphasis  shifted  in  the  other  direction,  and  the  nucleus  was 
regarded  as  ''the  heart  of  the  cell",  or,  currently,  as  ''containing 
all  the  information  for  the  organism".  Yet  both  cytoplasm  and 
nucleus  are  necessary  as  a  natural  and  inescapable  dualism  pre- 
sented by  the  cell.  Of  course  these  two  parts  of  the  cell  interact, 
and  Verworn  (1892)  early  conceived  a  scheme  embracing  possible 
interactions,  excepting  the  more  sophisticated  modern  concept  of 
steady  states.  Simply  stated,  we  want  to  know  what  the  nucleus 
does  and  how  it  does  it,  what  the  cytoplasm  does  and  how  this  is 
accomplished,  as  well  as  how  the  two  phases  cooperate  in  the  life 
of  the  cell. 

The  nucleus  seems  to  serve  as  a  chemical  factory  for  the  cyto- 
plasm, producing  essential  substances  or  the  means  of  their  pro- 
duction, apparently  coenzymes.  Apart  from  itself  growing  and 
replicating,  the  nucleus  contributes  substances  into  the  cytoplasm 
where  reactions  leading  to  metabolism  and  structural  growth  take 


EXTENSIONS  375 

place.  The  cytoplasm  would  have  at  any  moment  a  store  of  these 
substances,  exhaustible  if  the  nucleus  is  removed.  The  nucleus  has 
therefore  been  regarded  as  the  source  of  the  regeneration  of  enzyme 
systems  present  and  acting  in  the  cytoplasm  (Mazia,  1952). 

Stentors  emphasize  the  importance  of  this  trophic  function  of 
the  nucleus.  The  micronuclei  are  significant  only  in  genetic  recom- 
bination during  conjugation.  It  is  the  macronucleus  which  supports 
the  Kfe  of  the  cell,  though  this  involves  the  expression  of  specific 
genetic  determinants  derived  from  its  progenitor,  the  micro- 
nucleus,  as  was  demonstrated  for  Paramecium  by  Sonneborn  (1947). 
In  metazoa  the  metabolic  function  of  the  nucleus  is  cryptic  and 
not  obvious,  or  is  revealed  only  by  special  demonstrations  as  in 
neurone  regeneration  or  the  somatic  deletion  studies  of  Demerec. 
But  in  protozoa,  as  in  studies  of  microbial  genetics  and  the  new 
work  on  Neurospora^  the  trophic  role  of  the  nucleus  is  apparent. 

In  stentors,  the  macronucleus  is  clearly  necessary  for  both 
digestion  and  synthesis  which  leads  to  growth.  Therefore  it  should 
make  possible  the  formation  of  enzymes  and  may  be  a  source  of 
RNA,  via  nucleolar  extrusion,  for  protein  synthesis.  This  nucleus 
also  probably  sustains  respiration,  for  though  energy  metabolism 
long  continues  in  enucleates  it  gradually  diminishes.  Several 
instances  have  been  cited  which  show  that  the  quantitative  relation- 
ship between  nucleus  and  cytoplasm  is  important  for  these 
physiological  or  biochemical  processes;  and  it  is  in  the  relatively 
simple  alterability  of  the  nucleo-cytoplasmic  ratio  that  stentors 
should  prove  most  fruitful  in  studies  of  cell  physiology. 

Some  portion  of  the  macronucleus  is  essential  for  cytodifferen- 
tiation  in  oral  regeneration.  Presumably  this  support  is  either  a 
synthesis  or  a  mobilization  of  structural  proteins;  but  in  spite  of 
the  sameness  of  stentor  organelles  this  action  is  fraught  with 
specificities,  for  the  nucleus  of  one  species  of  Stentor  can  rarely  be 
exchanged  for  another  to  yield  an  effective  nucleo-cytoplasmic 
combination.  And  where  and  how  the  building  blocks  are  put 
together  in  formed  organelles  is  very  probably  the  work  of  the 
ectoplasm  and  its  pre-formed  structure. 

This  view  was  previsioned  by  Prowazek  in  the  course  of  his 
investigations  on  Stentor  and  has  been  enlarged  upon  by  others  up 
to  the  present  day  (Tartar,  1941b;  Sonneborn,  195 1;  Ephrussi, 
1953  ;  Weisz,  1954;  Danielli,  1958).  Noting  that  the  nucleus  is  not 


376  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

bound  to  the  cytoplasm  by  any  intimate  structure  and  requires  no 
specific  geometric  relationship  with  the  cytoplasm  for  its  eflfective 
action,  Prowazek  (1904)  inferred  that  there  is  only  a  substance 
relation  between  the  two  phases  of  the  cell  which  could  well  be 
explained  in  chemical  terms.  Neither  can  the  form  of  the  cell,  nor 
that  of  the  organism  in  the  case  of  protozoa,  be  related  to  the 
flowing  endoplasm  which  indeed  has  been  shown  in  Condylostoma 
(Tartar,  1941b)  and  in  the  regeneration  of  stentor  "skins'* 
(unpublished)  to  be  dispensable.  Therefore  nucleus  and  cytoplasm 
presumably  interact  by  chemical  contributions  to  each  other,  and 
guidance  of  the  elaboration  of  formed  parts  in  the  cytoplasm  is  to 
be  sought  in  neither  a  nucleus  of  unprescribed  location  nor  a  flowing 
endoplasm  but  in  the  most  solid  portion  of  cell,  namely,  the 
ectoplasm  (Prowazek,  19 13). 

Events  in  the  ectoplasm  of  Stentor  also  clearly  exert  control 
over  the  behavior  of  the  nuclei.  Micronuclei  divide  whenever  an 
oral  primordium  is  formed,  even  when  there  is  no  cytosomal 
fission.  Macronuclei  coalesce,  re-nodulate,  or  are  divided  according 
to  the  phase  of  the  cytoplasm  in  which  they  find  themselves. 
Compensatory  increase  in  macronuclear  volume  occurs  only  if 
primordia  are  formed.  And  the  disposition  of  the  macronuclear 
nodes  is  evidently  determined  in  large  part  by  the  pattern  of 
ectoplasmic  striping. 

The  cytoplasm  may  have  its  own  replicating  units,  including 
kinetosomes  as  important  elements  of  ectoplasmic  structure.  Self- 
reproducing  entities  are  of  limited  explanatory  value  because  they 
refer  us  back  to  another  of  the  same  type  of  entity  which  we  seek 
to  analyze  and  explain.  Yet  to  establish  a  genetic  continuity  of 
cytoplasmic  parts  would  tell  us  whence  new  entities  arise,  i.e., 
from  preexisting  ones,  and  this  is  a  great  aid  in  narrowing  the  field 
of  inquiry.  Moreover,  replicating  units  and  their  elaborations  alone 
would  not  make  an  organism  but  merely  an  assemblage.  ''  Is 
anyone  willing  to  believe",  asks  Sonneborn  (1951),  ''that,  if  all 
such  self-duplicating  components  of  the  cell  were  thrown  together 
in  a  test  tube  in  the  proper  portions  with  adequate  food  for  their 
multiplication,  a  Chilomonas  cell  or  any  cell  at  all  would  result? " 
Something  more  seems  to  be  needed  and  this  is  a  cortical  pattern 
factor  itself  having  genetic  continuity. 

In  Stentor,  development  is  organized  because  there  is  always  a 


EXTENSIONS  377 

previous   pattern.    A  cortical    pattern   of   polarized,   anisotropic 
lateral  striping  is  always  visibly  present  no  matter  how  we  fragment 
the  cell.  The  location,  number,  length  and  direction  of  asymmetry 
of  the  oral  primordium  are  determined  by  the  pattern  of  the  ecto- 
plasm, quite  independently  of  the  location  or  quantity  of  the  nucleus 
and  endoplasm.  Induction  of  mouthparts  at  the  terminus  of  the 
anlage  is  also  to  be  correlated  with  the  polar  ectoplasm,  for  in 
heteropolar  implants  two   sets  of  mouthparts  are  produced  in 
correspondence  with  two  separate  posterior  poles  although  the 
endoplasms  would  mingle  indiscriminately  and  the  nuclear  nodes 
may  be  located  anywhere.  Even  the  smallest,  nucleated  pieces  bear 
short  lengths  of  a  few  lateral  ciHary  bands  which  are  separated  at 
graded  distances  by  granular  stripes  so  that  healing  produces  a 
locus  of  stripe-width  contrast  and  regeneration  of  a  whole  is  always 
guided  by  this  preexisting  polarity  and  anisotropy.  Even  in  the 
relatively  dedifferentiated  cyst  stage,   striping  and  polarity  are 
evident,  according  to  the  drawings  of  Stein;  and  in  other  ciUates 
which  have  been  carefully  studied  all  landmarks  do  not  disappear 
and  some  cortical  pattern  evidently  persists  (e.g.,  Garnjobst,  1937). 
Empirically,  Stentor  possesses  at  all  times  —  in  all  our  experi- 
mental situations  save  one:  denudation  of  the  ectoplasm  —  an 
obviously  persistent  visible  pattern.  However  the  basic  cortical 
pattern  may  be  conceived,  to  postulate  it  as  axiomatic  or  as  a  factor 
always  present  from  the  initial  state  in  any  experiment  we  can 
perform,  has  an  important  consequence.  This  is  that  we  need  not 
and  cannot  derive  the  final  form  and  pattern  from  molecules  and 
their  spontaneous  aggregation  or  interactions  as  such.  True,  these 
cortical  cell  patterns  would  have  arisen  at  some  time  in  the  early 
evolution  of  life,  and  phenomena  such  as  the  association  of  collogen 
into  fibrous  sheets  may  give  us  some  hint  of  how  this  could  have 
been  brought  about.  Once  developed,  the  relatively  large  scale 
patterns  we  have  in  mind,  like  such  replicating  units  as  macro- 
molecules,  chromosomes,  and  perhaps  kinetosomes,  could  have 
been  carefully  conserved  and  never  destroyed  but  passed  on  by 
genetic  continuity,  pattern  producing  further  pattern,  and  these 
patterns  gradually  evolving  in  complexity,  on  the  one  hand  into 
very  complicated  unicellular  flagellates  and  ciliates  and  on  the 
other  into  equally  complex  yet  cryptic  egg  patterns  capable  of 
guiding  the  development  of  the  whole  range  of  elaborate  multi- 


378  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

cellular  organisms.  Therefore,  in  any  experiment  we  perform  today 
we  do  not  have  to  demonstrate  the  origin  of  life  by  reducing  the 
results  to  molecules  and  their  interactions,  for  pattern  is  always 
there  to  start  with.  This  pattern  factor  may  have  undreamed  of 
capabilities,  itself  constituting  a  primary  determinate  of  what  kind 
of  molecules  are  synthesized  in  association  with  it  and  how  they 
behave,  for  example,  in  contributing  to  growth  or  increase  in  that 
pattern. 

These  patterns  would  be  in  one  sense  "of  molecules";  in  pre- 
cisely this  sense,  that  the  organism  is  obviously  reducible  to  a 
collection  of  identifiable  molecules  after  chemical  treatment  and 
destruction  in  a  test  tube.  This  would  explain  why  organisms  in 
their  functions  and  even  in  their  forms  are  very  definitely  and 
sometimes  grossly  affected  by  the  presence  of  certain  types  of 
molecules.  Even  a  single  ion  like  lithium  exerts  great  influence  on 
morphogenesis  in  both  embryos  and  stentors.  For  if  the  patterns 
are  ''made  up  of  molecules"  the  kinds  of  molecules  and  ions 
available  would  clearly  have  a  substantial  effect  on  these  patterns. 
The  patterns  themselves  could  have  just  as  much  influence  in  the 
formation  and  behavior  of  the  molecules.  There  is  some  evidence, 
for  instance,  that  the  molecules  we  analyze  in  the  test  tube  do  not 
exist  as  such  in  the  organism  (see  Needham,  1933).  Picric  acid  is 
said  to  precipitate  proteins  in  solution  but  not  when  injected  into 
amoebas,  and  sea  urchin  eggs  do  not  show  the  characteristic 
ultraviolet  absorption  spectrum  of  proteins  until  they  are  killed. 

From  these  considerations  it  follows  that  pattern  and  substance 
are  two  irreducible  aspects  of  the  organism.  They  may  be  related 
in  the  sense  of  Neils  Bohr's  principle  of  complementarity,  as  he 
has  himself  suggested  (1958). 

It  would  appear,  therefore,  that  our  greatest  lack  and  most 
fruitful  opportunity  in  biology  lies  in  conceiving  and  testing  the 
nature  and  capabilities  of  persistent  supramolecular  patterns.  For 
this  task  stentors  should  be  highly  appropriate  because  they 
present  us  with  a  visible  cortical  geometry  as  an  empirical  reality, 
and  stentors  as  the  most  operable  of  all  cells  have  already  shown 
how  important  this  pattern  is  in  determining  form  and  cyto- 
differentiation. 

Any  indication,  however  general,  of  the  possible  nature  of  basic 
cortical  patterns  in  ciliates  and  in  eggs  should  help  in  transcending 


EXTENSIONS  379 

this  most  important  gap  in  our  understanding  of  organisms. 
Proceeding  from  the  Stetitor  studies  we  may  suggest  that  one 
characteristic  of  the  cortical  pattern  is  that  it  is  beyond  indivi- 
duahty  but  bears  intrinsically  the  tendency  or  capacity  to  integrate 
as  one  or  more  than  one  individuality.  In  terms  of  a  model,  the 
pattern  might  therefore  be  conceived  as  a  network  which  is  a  type 
of  repeat  pattern,  somehow  capable  of  deriving  a  wholeness  while 
maintaining  its  repeat  character  and  potentialities  beyond  indivi- 
duality. Thus  fragments  of  a  stentor  or  an  egg  when  physically 
isolated  can  themselves  become  wholes,  so  that  the  original 
individuality  is  seen  to  have  contained  multiple  nascent  indivi- 
dualities. When  a  stentor  or  cell  normally  divides  the  original 
integrated  pattern  is  obviously  converted  into  two.  Conversely,  two 
or  more  whole  eggs  or  stentors  can  be  fused  together  to  produce 
only  a  single  individuahty  from  the  several  original  ones.  There- 
fore, whatever  is  operating  and  determinant  in  these  experimental 
situations  is  something  which  is  beyond  individuality  but  tends 
to  individuate.  It  is  this  characteristic  which  has  made  pattern 
unmechanical  and  so  difficult  to  pin  down,  even  in  the  case  of 
mosaic  eggs;  for  in  experiments  the  pattern  reintegrates  after 
disturbances  and  deletions  so  that  there  is  no  point  to  point 
correspondence  on  which  to  base  analysis  until  the  work  of  deter- 
mination has  already  been  accomplished.  If  the  pattern  factor  is 
beyond  individuality,  an  important  consequence  is  that  wholeness 
is  not,  as  many  have  maintained,  an  irreducible,  axiomatic  presup- 
position about  any  organism  but  rather  a  result  or  an  achievement, 
as  McDougall  (1938)  has  well  stated.  At  the  moment  when  a 
fragment  of  an  egg  or  a  ciliate  is  cut  there  is  no  wholeness  except 
in  the  sense  of  an  object  which  has  been  physically  isolated,  nor  is 
there  a  wholeness  at  the  moment  when  two  organisms  are  fused. 
Instead,  there  are  molecules,  replicating  units,  and  above  all  a 
pattern  factor  which  is  beyond  individuality  through  which  a 
wholeness  is  later  achieved.  In  learning  how  this  may  come  about, 
Stentor  may  be  an  invaluable  guide.  Though  Stentor  is  a  single  cell 
and  can  presumably  teach  us  nothing  x)f  the  complex  intercellular 
relations  which  form  the  multicellular  organism,  it  may  well  be 
that  comprehending  the  organization  of  a  unicellular  animal  is  a 
fruitful  if  not  essential  step  towards  evolving  a  satisfactory  theory 
of  more  complex  developments. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY   OF   STENTOR 

Adolph,  E.  F.  (1931):  The  Regulation  of  Size  as  Illustrated  in  Unicellular 

Organisms.  Thomas,  Springfield,  Illinois.  (Review  of  size  in  relation  to 

regeneration.) 
Allescher,  Marie  (19 12):  tJber  den  Einfluss  der  Gestalt  des  Kernes  auf 

die   Grossenabnahme   hungernder   Infusorien.   Arch.   Protistenk.   27, 

129-171. 
Alverdes,  F.  (1922):  Zur  Lokalisation  des  chemischen  und  thermischen 

Sinnes  bei  Paramoecium  und  Stentor.  Zool.  Anz.  55,  19-21. 
Andrews,    E.   A.    (1945):    Stentor's   anchoring   organs,  jf.  Morph.   77, 

219-232. 
Andrews,  E.  A.  (1946):  Ingestion  organs  in  Folliculinids  and  in  Stentors. 

y.  Morph.  79,  419-444. 
Andrews,  E.  A.  (1948a):  Folliculinids  and  Stentors  in  British  Columbia. 

Trans.  Am.  Micros.  Soc.  67,  61-65. 
Andrews,   E.  A.   (1948b):   Surface  parts  of  the  contractile  vesicle  of 

Stentor  coeruleus.  J.  Morph.  82,  257-268. 
Balamuth,  W.  (1940):  Regeneration  in  protozoa:  a  problem  of  morpho- 
genesis. Quart.  Rev.  Biol.  15,  290-337. 
Balbiani,  E.  G.  (1861):  Recherches  sur  les  phenomenes  sexuelles  des 

Infusoires.  J.  de  Physiol.  t.IV.  (Not  seen). 
Balbiani,  E.  G.  (1882):  Les  Protozoires.  Le9ons  faites  au  College  de 

France.  Jour,  de  Micrographie  t.VI,  p.  474  (or  1881?  Not  seen). 
Balbiani,  E.  G.  (1889):  Recherches  experimentales  sur  la  merotomie  des 

infusoires  cilies.  Contribution  a  I'etude  du  role  du  noyau  cellulaire. 

Recueil  Zoologique  Suisse  5,  1-72. 
Balbiani,  E.  G.  (1891a):  Sur  les  regenerations  successives  du  peristome 

comme  caractere  d'age  chez  les  Stentors  et  sur  le  role  du  noyau  dans  ce 

phenomene.  Zool.  Anz.  14,  312-316;  323-327. 
Balbiani,  E.  G.  (1891b):  Sur  la  formation  des  monstres  doubles  chez  les 

Infusoires.  Jf.  de  I'Anat  u.  de  la  Physiol.  27,  169-196. 
Balbiani,  E.  G.  (1891C-2):  Nouvelles  recherches  experimentales  sur  la 

merotomie  des  infusoires  cilies.  Annales  de  micrographie  4,  369-407; 

449-489. 
Balbiani,   E.   G.   (1893):   Nouvelles  recherches  experimentales  sur  la 

merotomie  des  infusoires  cilies.  Ibid.  5,  1-25;  49-84;  113-134. 
Barbier,  M.,  E.  Faure-Fremiet,  and  E.  Lederer  (1956):  Sur  les  pig- 
ments du  cilie  Stentor  niger.  C.  R.  Acad.  Sci.,  Paris  242,  2 182-2 184. 
Bary,  B.  M.  (1950):  Four  new  species  of  fresh-water  ciliates  from  New 

Zealand.  Zoology  publications  from  Victoria  Univ.   College  (N.Z.), 

No.  2. 

"    380 


BIBLIOGRAPHY    OF    STENTOR  381 

Belda,  W.  H.  and  W.  J.  Bowen  (1940):  A  tested  method  of  growing 

Stentor  coeruleiis.  Science  92,  206. 
Bishop,    Ann    (1927):    The    cytoplasmic    structure    of    Spirostomum 

ambiguum,  Ehrenberg.  Quart.  Jf.  Micros.  Sci.  71,  147-172.  (Containing 

review  of  fiber  systems  in  Stentor.) 
Bracket,  J.  (1957):  Biochemical  Cytology,  Academic  Press,  New  York. 
Brauer,  a.  (1885):  Bursaria  truncatella  unter  Beriicksichtigung  anderer 

Heterotrichen  und  der  Vorticellen.  Jena.  Z.  Naturwiss.  19,  489-519. 

(With  notes  on  stripe  multiplication  in  Stentor.) 
BuLLiNGTON,  W.  E.  (1925):  A  study  of  spiral  movement  in  the  ciliate 

infusoria.  Arch.  Protistenk.,  50,  219-274. 
BuRNSiDE,  L.  H.  (1929):  Relation  of  body  size  to  nuclear  size  in  Stentor 

coeruleus.  jf.  Exptl.  Zool.  54,  473-483. 
Causin,  M.  (193 i):  La  regeneration  du  Stentor  coeruleus.  Arch.  d'Anat. 

Micros.  27,  107-125. 
Chambers,  R.  and  C.-Y.  Kao  (1952):  The  effect  of  electrolytes  on  the 

physical  state  of  the  nerve  axon  of  the  squid  and  of  Stentor,  a  protozoon. 

Exptl.  Cell  Research  3,  564-573. 
Child,  C.  M.  (1914):  The  axial  gradient  in  ciliate  Infusoria.  Biol.  Bull. 

26,  36-54. 
Child,  C.  M.  (1949):  A  further  study  of  indicator  patterns  in  ciliate 

protozoa.  J'.  Exptl.  Zool.,  in,  315-347. 
Claparede,  E.  and  J.  Lachmann  (1857):  Note  sur  la  reproduction  des 

Infusoires.  Ann.  Sci.  nat.,  Zool.,  4,  221-244.  (Not  seen). 
Claparede,  E.  and  J.  Lachmann  (1858-61):  Etudes  sur  les  Infusoires  et 

les  Rhizopodes.  Geneve,  2  vols.  Mem.  Inst.  nat.  genev.,  5;  6;  7,  1-291. 

(Not  seen). 
Cox,  J.  D.  (1876):  Multiplication  by  fission  of  Stentor  miilleri.  Am. 

Naturalist  10,  275-278.  (Incidental). 
Dabrowska,  J.  (1956):  Tresura  Paramecium  caudatum,  Stentor  coeruleus, 

Spirostomum  ambiguum  na  budzce  swietne.    Folia  Biologica,  Polska 

Akademia  Nauk.  4,  77-91.  (With  English  summary). 
Daniel,  J.  F.  (1909):  Adaptation  and  immunity  of  lower  organisms  to 

ethyl  alcohol.  J.  Exptl.  Zool.  6,  571-61 1. 
Davenport,  C.  B.  and  H.  V.  Neal  (1896).  Studies  in  morphogenesis,  V. 

On  the  acclimatization  of  organisms  to  poisonous  chemical  substances. 

Archiv.f.  Entw.-mech.  2,  564-583. 
Daw^son,  J.  A.  (1953):  The  culture  of  Blepharisma  undulans  and  Stentor 

coeruleus.  Bio.  Rev.  College  City  of  Nezv  York,  15,  13-15.  (Not  seen). 
De  Terra,  Noel  (1959):  Personal  communication. 
De  Terra,  Noel  (i960):  Studies  of  nucleo-cytoplasmic  interactions  and 

P^2  uptake  during  cell  division  in  Stentor  coendeus.  Exptl.  Cell  Research. 

(In  press.) 
Dierks,     K.    (1926a):    Untersuchungen    iiber    die    Morphologic    und 

Physiologic    des    Stentor  coeruleus  mit    besonderer    Briicksichtigung 

seiner  kontraktilen  und  konduktilen  Elemente.  Arch.  Protistenk.,  54, 

1-9 1. 


382  THE  BIOLOGY  OF  STENTOR 

DiERKS,    K.    (1926b):    Lahmungsversuche   an  Stentor  coeruleus  durch 

Kaliumionen.  Zool.  Anz.  67,  207-218. 
Faure-Fremiet,  E.  (1906):   Sur  un  cas  de  monstruosite  chez  Stentor 

coeruleus.  Arch.  d'Anat.  Micros.,  8,  660-666. 
Faure-Fremiet,  E.  (1936):  Condylostoma  (Stentor)  auriculatus  (Gruher). 

Bull,  de  la  Soc.  Zool.  de  France  61,  51 1-5 19. 
Faure-Fremiet,  E.  and  E.  Lederer  (1956):  Microscopie  electronique  de 

quelque  cilies.  Bidl.  soc.  zool.  France  81,  9-11. 
Faure-Fremiet,  E.  and  C.  Rouiller  (1955):  Microscopie  electronique 

des  structures  ectoplasmiques  chez  les  cilies  du  genre  Stentor.  C.R. 

Acad.  Sci.,  Paris  241,  678-680. 
Faure-Fremiet,  E.,  C.  Rouiller,  and  M.  Gauchery  (1956):  Les  struc- 
tures myoides  chez  les  cilies.  Etude  au  microscope  electronique.  Arch. 

d'Anat.  micros.  Morph.  exp.  45,  1 39-161. 
Gelei,   J.   V.    (1925):    tjber   der   Kannibalismus   bei    Stentoren.   Arch. 

Protistenk.  52,  404-417. 
Gelei,  J.  v.  (1926):  Sind  die  Neurophane  von  neresheimer  neuroide 

Elemente?  Arch.  Protistenk.  54,  232-242. 
Gelei,  J.   v.   (1927):   Angaben   zur   der   Symbiosefrage  von   Chlorella. 

Biol.  Zentralbl.  47,  449-461.  (Including  some  remarks  on  Stentor.) 
Gelfan,  S.  (1927):  The  electrical  conductivity  of  protoplasm  and  a  new 

method  of  its  determination.  Univ.  Calif.  Publ.  Zool.  29,  453-456. 
Gerstein,  J.  (1937):  The  culture  and  division  rate  of  Stentor  coeruleus. 

Proc.  Soc.  Exptl.  Biol.  Med.  37,  2 10-2 11. 
Greeley,  A.  W.  (1901):  On  the  analogy  between  the  effects  of  loss  of 

water  in  lowering  of  the  temperature.   Am.  J.  Physiol.   6,   (1901-2), 

122-128. 
Gruber,  a.  (1878):  Die  Haftorgane  der  Stentoren.  Zool.  Anz.  i,  390-391. 
Gruber,    a.    (1883):    Ueber   die    Einflusslosigkeit   des    Kerns    auf   die 

Bewegung,    die    Ernahrung    und    das    Wachstum    einzelliger    Tiere. 

Biol.  Zentralbl.  3,  580-582. 
Gruber,  A.  (1885a):  Ueber  kiinstliche  Teilung  bei  Infusorien.  Ibid.  4, 

717-722. 
Gruber,   A.    (1885b):    Ueber  kunstliche   Teilung   bei    Infusorien   (II). 

Ibid.  5,  1 37-141. 
Gruber,  A.  (1886):  Beitrage  zur  Kenntniss  der  Physiologic  und  Biologic 

der  Protozoen.  Ber.  naturf.  Ges.  Freiburg,  i.B.  i,  33-56. 
GuTTES,  E.  and  Sophie  Guttes  (1959):  Regulations  of  mitosis  in  Stentor 

coeruleus.  Science  129,  1483. 
Hamburger,  Clara  (1908):  Zur  Kenntnis  der  Conjugation  von  Stentor 

coeruleus   nebst    einigen   allgemeinen   Bemerkungen    liber    die    Con- 
jugation der  Infusorien.  Z.  wiss.  Zool.  90,  421-433. 
Hammerling,  J.  (1946):  tJber  die  Symbiose  von  Stentor  polymorphus. 

Biol.  Zentralbl.  65,  52-61. 
Hartmann,  M.  (1922):  tJber  den  dauernden  Ersatz  der  ungeschlect- 

lichen   Fortpflantzung   durch  fortgesetzte   Regenerationen.   Ibid.   42, 

364-381. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY    OF    STENTOR  383 

Hausmann,    Gertrud    (1927):    Uber   die    Bewegungen   einigen    ciliaten 

Protozoen  im  Wechselstrom.  Biol.  Generalis  3,  463-474. 
Haye,  a.  (1930):  iJber  den  Extretionsapparat  bei  den  Protisten,  nebst 

Bemerkungen    liber    einige    andere    feinere    Strukturverhaltnisse    der 

untersuchten  Arten.  Arch.  Protistenk.  70,  1-86. 
Hegner,  R.  W.  (1926):  The  interrelations  of  protozoa  and  the  utricles  of 

Utricularia.  Biol.  Bull.  50,  239-270. 
Heilbrunn,    L.    V.    (1928):    The    colloid    chemistry    of    protoplasm. 

Protoplasm-Monographien  Vol.  i,  Berlin. 
Heilbrunn,  L.  V.  (1943  or  1952):  An  Outline  of  General  Physiology, 

either  2nd  or  3rd  ed.  Saunders,  Philadelphia. 
Hetherington,  a.  (1932a):  The  constant  culture  of  Stentor  coeruleus. 

Arch.  Protiste?ik.  76,  1 18-129. 
Hetherington,  A.  (1932b):  On  the  absence  of  physiological  regeneration 

in  Stentor  coeruleus.  Ibid.  77,  58-63. 
Hofer,  B.  (1890):  Ueber  die  lahmende  Wirkung  des  Hydroxylaniines 

auf  die  contraction  Elemente.  Z.  zuiss.  Mikr.  7,  318-326  {S.  coeruleus 

included). 
Holt,  E.  B.  and  F.  S.  Lee  (1901):  The  theory  of  phototactic  response. 

Am.y.  Physiol.  4,  460-481. 
Howland,    Ruth   B.    (1928):   A   note   on   Astasia   captive   Beauchamp. 

Science,  68,  37. 
Hyman,  Libbie  H.  (1925,   193 1):  Methods  of  securing  and  cultivating 

protozoa.  Trans.  Am.  Micros.  Soc.  44,  216-221;  50,  50-57. 
IsHiKAWA,  H.  (1912):  Wundheilungs-  und  Regenerationsvorgange  bei 

Infusorien.  Arch.  Entw.-mech.  35,  1-29. 
Ivanic,  M.   (1926):  Zur  Auffassung  der  Kernverhaltnisse  bei  Stentor 

coeruleus  und  Stentor  polymorphus,   nebst   Bemerkung  iiber  einige 

Kernverhaltnisse  bei  Infusorien  im  allgemeinen.  Zool.  Anz.  66,  55-61. 

(Dubious). 
Ivanic,    M.    (1927):    Uber   der   Kannibahsmus   bei   Amoeba   verrucosa 

(Ehrb.),  nebst  Bemerkung  uber  den  Kannibalismus  bei  Protozoen  im 

allgemeinen.  Ibid.  74,  313-321.  (Dubious). 
Jennings,  H.  S.  (1899):  Studies  on  reactions  to  stimuli  in  unicellular 

organisms.    III.   Reactions   to  localized  stimuli  in   Spirostomiun  and 

Stentor.  Am.  Naturalist  33,  373-389. 
Jennings,  H.  S.  (1902):  Studies  on  reactions  to  stimuli  in  unicellular 

organisms.    IX.    On    the   behavior   of   fixed    Infusoria   {Stentor   and 

Vorticella),  with  special  reference  to  the  modifiability  of  Protozoon 

reactions.  Am.  J.  Physiol.  8,  (1902-3),  23-60. 
Jennings,  H.  S.  and  C.  Jamieson  (190^2):  Studies  on  reactions  to  stimuli 

in  unicellular  organisms.  X.  The  movements  and  reactions  of  pieces 

of  ciliate  infusoria.  Biol.  Bull.  3,  225-234. 
Jennings,   H.   S.   and  E.   M.   Moore  (1902):   Studies  on  reactions  to 

stimuli  in  unicellular  organisms.  VIII.  On  the  reactions  of  Infusoria 

to  carbonic  and  other  acids,  with  especial  reference  to  the  causes  of  the 

gatherings  spontaneously  formed.  Am.  J.  Physiol.  6,  (1901-2),  233-350. 


384  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

Johnson,  H.  P.  (1893):  A  contribution  to  the  morphology  and  biology 

of  the  Stentors.  J.  Morph.  8,  467-562. 
Kahl,  a.  (1935):   Wimperthiere  oder  Ciliata.    In  Die  Tierwelt  Deutsch- 

landsy  25th  Teil,  Part  3,  *'  Spirotricha  ",  457-466.  Jena. 
Kalmus,  H.  (1928):  liber  den  Bodenfauna  der  Moldau  im  Gebiete  von 

Prag.    Ein    Jahreszyklus.    II.    Protozoa,    etc.    Mit    einem    Anhang: 

OkologischeBeobachtungenundVersuche./wferwa^  Rev.  Hydrobiol.  19, 

349-429. 
Kent,  W.  S.  (188 1-2):  A  Manual  of  the  Infusoria.  London,  Vol.  II, 

pp. 588-596. 
Kessler,  G.  (1882):  Ein  Beitrag  zur  Lehre  von  der  Symbiose.  Arch.f. 

Anat.  u.  Physiol.  1882,  490-492.  (Not  seen.) 
Kimball,  R.  F.  (1958) :  Experiments  with  Stentor  coeruleus  on  the  nature 

of  the  radiation-induced  delay  in  fission  in  the  ciliates.  J.  Protozool.  5, 

151-155- 
KiRBY,   H.,   Jr.    (1941a):   Relationships   between   certain  protozoa  and 

other  animals.  In  Protozoa  in  Biological  Research  (edited  by  Calkins 

and  Summers)  Columbia  University  Press,  pp.  890-1008. 
KiRBY,  H.,  Jr.   (1941b):   Organisms  living  on  and  in  protozoa.  Ibid., 

1009-1113. 
KiRBY,  H.,  Jr.  (1956):  In:  Opinion  418.  Opin.  Internat.  Comm.  ZooL 

Nom.  14,  46-68. 
Lankester,  E.  R.  (1873):  Blue  stentorin,  the  coloring  matter  of  Stentor 

coeruleus.  Quart.  Jf.  Micros.  Sci.  13,   139-142. 
Lieberkuhn,   N.   (1857):   (Muskelfasern  in  Stentor,   etc. — fibrillar  and 

contractile    structures   in   protozoa.)   Arch.  Anat.  u.  Physiol.    3,    20. 

(Not  seen.) 
LiLLiE,  F.  R.  (1896):  On  the  smallest  parts  of  stentor  capable  of  re- 
generation ;  a  contribution  on  the  limits  of  divisibility  of  living  matter. 

jf.  Morph.  12,  239-249. 
Madlen,  J.  (1946):  (The  significance  and  occurrence  of  micro-organisms 

in  forest  soils.)  Lesnicka  Prace  25  (1/2),  20-31.  (S.  polymorphus  in- 
correctly listed  as  a  soil  organism).  (Not  seen.) 
Maier,  N.  H.  (1903):  tjber  den  feineren  Bau  der  Wimperapparate  der 

Infusorien.  Arch.  Protistenk.  2,  71-179. 
Mast,    S.   O.   (1906):   Light  reactions  in  lower  organisms.    I.   Stentor 

coeruleus.  J.  Expl.  Zool.  3,  359-399. 
Maupas,  E.  (1879):  Micronucleus  of  Stentor  coerideus  and  Spirostomum 

ambiguum.  C.  R.  Acad.  Sci.,  Paris  (1879),  1274. 
Maupas,  E.  (1883):  Contribution  a  I'etude  morphologique  et  anatomique 

des  Infusoires  cilies.  Arch.  Zool.  exper.  et  gen.  i,  427-644. 
Maupas,  E.  (1888):  Recherches  experimentales  sur  la  multiplication  des 

infusoires  cilies.  Arch.  Zool.  exp.  et  gen.  6,  165-277. 
Meissner,  M.  (1888):  BeitragezurErnahrungsphysiologie  derProtozoen. 

Z.  wiss.  Zool.  46,  498-516. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY    OF    STENTOR  385 

Merton,     H.     (1932):     Gestalterhaltende     Fixierungs  —  versuche     an 

besonders    kontraktilen    Infusorien    nebst    Beobachtungen    iiber    das 

Verhalten  des  lebenden  Myoneme  und  Wimpem  bei  Stentor.  Arch. 

Protistenk.  77,  491-521. 
Merton,  H.  (1935):  Zwangsreaktionen  bei  Stentor  als  Folge  bestimmter 

Salzwirkung.  Biol.  ZenTralbL  55,  268-285. 
M0LLER,  K.  M.  (i960):  On  the  nature  of  Stentorin.  Compt.  re?id.  trav. 

Lab.  Carlsberg  (in  press). 
MoNOD,  J.  (1933):  Mise  en  evidence  du  gradient  axial  chez  les  infusoires 

cilies  par  photolyse  a  I'aide  des  rayons  ultraviolets.  C.  R.  Acad.  Set., 

Paris  196,  212-214. 
Morgan,  T.  H.   (1901a):  Regeneration  of  proportionate  structures  in 

Stentor.  Biol.  Bull.  2,  311-328. 
Morgan,  T.  H.  (1901b):  Regeneration.  Macmillan,  London. 
MoxoN,  W.  (1869) :  On  some  points  in  the  anatomy  of  Stentor  and  on  its 

mode  of  division.  J.  Anat.  and  Physiol.  3,  279-293.  (Cambridge). 
MuGARD,  Helene  and  Bernadette  Courtney  (1955):  Paralysie  des  In- 
fusoires  Cilies  au  moyen  des  phosphates  alcalins.  Bull.   Soc.   Zool. 

France  80,  196-205. 
MtJLLER,  J.   (1856):    Einige  Beobachtungen  an   Infusorien.    Monatsber. 

preuss.  Akad.  Wissensch.  1856,  389,  393  (Not  seen). 
MuLSOW,  W.  (1913):  Die  Conjugation  von  Stentor  coerideus  und  Stentor 

polyinorphus.  Arch.  Protistenk.  28,  363-388. 
Neresheimer,  E.  R.  (1903):  Ueber  die  Hohe  histologischen  Differen- 

zierung  bei  heterotrichen  Ciliaten.  Ibid.  2,  305-324. 
Neresheimer,  E.  R.  (1907):  Nochmals  iiber  Stentor  coeruleus.  Ibid.  9, 

137-138. 
Oken,    L.    (18 1 5):    Lehrbuch    der    Natiirgeschichte,  3  Teil.   Zoologique. 

Erste  Abt.  Fleischlose  Thiere.  Jena.  (Not  seen.) 
Otterstrom,  C.  V.  and  K.  Larsen  (1946):  Extensive  mortality  caused  by 

the  infusorian  Stentor  polymorphus  Ehrenb.  Rept.  Danish  Biol.  Sta.  48, 

(1943-5),  53-57-  (Dubious). 
Packard,  C.  E.  (1937):  Oblique  division  in  Stentor.  Trans.  Am.  Micros. 

Soc.  56,  191-192.  (Incidental). 
Park,  O.  (1929):  The  osmiophilic  bodies  of  the  protozoans,  Stentor  and 

Leucophr^^s.  Trans.  Am.  Micros.  Soc.  48,  20-29. 
Penard,  E.  (1922):  Etudes  sur  les  Infusoires  d'Eau  douce.  Geneve. 
Peters,  A.  W.  (1904):  Metabolism  and  division  in  protozoa.  Proc.  Am. 

Acad.  Arts,  Sci.  39,  441-516. 
Peters,  A.  W.  (1908):  Chemical  studies  on  the  cell  and  its  medium. 

III.  The  function  of  the  inorganic  .salts  of  the  Protozoan  cell  and  its 

medium.  Am.  J.  Physiol.  21,  105-125. 
POPOFF,    M.    (1908):    Experimentelle   Zellstudien.   Arch.    Zellforsch.    i, 

245-379. 
PopoFF,  M.  (1909):  Experimentelle  Zellstudien.  II.  Ober  die  Zellgrosse, 
ihre  fixierung  und  Vererbung.  Ibid.,  3,  124-180. 


386  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

Prowazek,  S.  (1901):  Beitrage  zur  Protoplasmaphysiologie  B/o/.  Zentralbl. 

21,  87-95;  144-155- 
Prowazek,    S.    (1904):    Beitrag   zur    Kenntnis    der    Regeneration    und 

Biologic  der  Protozoen.  Arch.  Protistenk.  3,  44-59. 
Prowazek,   S.   (1913):   Studien  zur  Biologie  der  Protozoen.  VI.  Arch. 

Protistenk.  31,  47-71. 
Randall,  J.  T.  (1956):  Fine  structure  of  some  ciliate  protozoa.  Nature^ 

178,  9-14. 
Randall,  J.  T.  and  Sylvia  Jackson  (1958):  Fine  structure  in  Stentor 

polymorphus.  J.  Biophys.  Biochem.  Cytol.  4,  807-830. 
RoESLE,   E.    (1902):    Die   Reaktion  einiger   Infusorien  auf  einzelne   In- 

duktionsschlage.  Z.  allgem.  Physiol.  2,  139-168.  (Not  seen.) 
RoSKiN,  G.  (1915):  La  structure  des  myonemes  contractiles  de  Stentor 

coeruleus.  Tirage  a  part  de  "  Memoires  Scientifiques  des  Chaniavsky 

Universite  de  Moscou  ",  Vol.  i.  (Not  seen.) 
RosKiN,    G.    (1922):    LJber  den   Bau  von   kontraktilen   Elementen   und 

Stutzsubstanzen  bei  einigen  Protozoen.  (Russ.  with  Ger.  summary.) 

Arch.  Soc.  Russe  Protist.  Moscow  i,  35-45.  (Not  seen.) 
RosKiN,  G.  (1923):  La  structure  des  myonemes  des  Infusoires.  Bull.  Biol., 

France  et  Belg.  57,  143-15 1. 
RosKiN,    G.,    i.    V.    Semenov    (1933):    (Study   of  oxidation-reduction 

processes  in  the  cell).  Arch.  Russes,  Anat.  Hist,  et  Embryol.   12  (i), 

Russ.,  27-55;  German  trans.   180-182.  (Not  seen.) 
ScHAEFFER,  A.  A.  (1910):  Selection  of  food  in  Stentor  coeruleus  (Ehr.). 

y.  Exptl.  Zool.,  8,  75-132. 
ScHONFELD,  C.  (1959):   Ubcr  das  parasitische  Verhalten  einer  Astasia — 

Art  in  Stentor  coeruleus.  Arch.  Protistenk.  104,  261-264. 
Schroder,    O.    (1907):    Beitrage    zur    Kenntnis    von  Stentor   coeruleus 

Ehrbg.  und  »S^.  roeselii  Ehrbg.  Ibid.  8,  1-16. 
Schuberg,  a.  (1890):  Zur  Kenntnis  der  Stentor  coeruleus.  Zool.  Jahrb., 

Abt.  Anat.  4,  197-238. 
Schuberg,  A.  (1905):  Uber  Cilien  und  Trichocysten  einiger  Infusorien. 

Arch.  Protistenk.  6,  61-110. 
ScHULZE,    K.    L.    (195 1):    Experimentelle    Untersuchungen    iiber    die 

Chlorellen-symbiose  bei  Ciliaten.  Biol.  gen.  {Vienna),  19,  281-298. 
ScHWALBE,  G.  (1866):  tjber  die  kontraktilen  Behalter  der  Infusorien. 

Arch.  f.  mikr.  Anat.  2,  351-371. 
Schwartz,  V.  (1934):  Versuche  iiber  Regeneration  und  Kerndimorphis- 

mus  der  Ciliaten.  Nachr.  Ges.  Wiss.  Gottingen,  N.S.  i,  143-155. 
Schwartz,  V.  (1935):  Versuche  iiber  Regeneration  und  Kerndimorphis- 

mus  bei  Stentor  coeruleus  Ehrbg.  Arch.  Protistenk.  85,  100-139. 
SiLEN,  L.  (1948):  On  a  new  stentor  from  the  west  coast  of  Sweden.  Ark. 

Zool.  {Stockhohn)  40A  (No.  8),  i-io. 
SiMROTH,   H.   (1876):   Zur  Kenntnis  des  Bewegungsapparates  der  In- 

fusionsthiere.  Arch.  micr.  Anat.  12,  (Not  seen). 
Sleigh,   M.  A.   (1956):   Metachronism  and  frequency  of  beat  in  the 

peristomial  cilia  of  Stentor.  J.  Exptl.  Biol.  33,  15-28. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY^    OF     STENTOR  387 

Sleigh,  M.  A.  (1957):  Further  observations  on  co-ordination  and  the 

determination  of  frequency  in  the  peristomial  cilia  of  Stentor.  Ihid.  34, 

106-115. 
Sleigh,  M.  A.  (i960):  The  form  of  beat  in  cilia  of  Stentor  and  Opalina. 

Ibid.  37,  I -10. 
SoKOLOFF,  B.   (1923):  Hunger  and  regeneration.  J.  Roy.  Micros.  Soc, 

London,  (1923),  183-189. 
SoKOLOFF,  B.  (1924):  Das  Regenerations  problem  bei  Protozoen.  Arch. 

Protistenk.  47,  143-252. 
SoKOLOFF,    D.    (1930a):    Las    particularidades    del    Stentor    viridis    de 

Xochimilco.  An.  Inst.  Biol.  {Univ.  Nac.  Mexico)  1(1),  83-86.  (Not 

seen.  See  Kahl.) 
SoKOLOFF,  D.  (1930b):  Stentor  oligomicleatiis ,  sp.  nov.  Ibid,  i,  327-328. 

(Not  seen.  See  Kahl.) 
SoSNOWSKi,  J.  (1899):  Relations  entre  le  noyeau  et  le  Protoplasme  chez 

les  protozoaires.  Trans.  Lab.  Zoot.  Varsovie.  20,  1-47  (Not  seen). 
Sprugel,    G.,   Jr.    (1951):   Vertical   distribution   of  Stentor  coeruleus  in 

relation   to    dissolved   oxygen   levels    in   an    Iowa   pond.    Ecology   32, 

147-149. 
Stein,  F.  (1867):  Der  Organismus  der  Infusionsthiere.  Abt.  II.  Leipzig. 
Stevens,  Nellie  M.  (1903):  Notes  on  regQwev^Xxonin  Stentor  coeruleus. 

Arch.  Entzu.-mech.  16,  461-475. 
Stolte,  H.  a.  (1922):  Der  Einfluss  der  Umwelt  auf  Macronucleus  und 

Plasma  von  Stentor  coeruleus  Ehrbg.  Bin  experimentelles  Beitrag  zur 

Frage  der  Kernplasmabeziehungen.  Arch.  Protistenk.  45,  344-389. 
Strom,  K.  M.  (1926):  The  influence  of  altered  H-ion  concentrations  on 

Stentor,    Diaptomus    and    Daphnia.    Nyt.    Mag.    Naturvidenskab    64, 

109-115.  (Not  seen.) 
SwARCZEW^SKY,  B.  (1929):  Zur  Kenntnis  der  Baikalprotistenfauna.  Die 

an  den  Baikalgammariden  lebenden  Infusorien.  VI.  Stentorina.  Arch. 

Protistenk.  65,  38-44. 
Tartar,  V.  (1941a):  Grafting  and  reconstitution  in  a  ciliate  protozoan. 

(Abstr.)  Anat.  Rec,  81  Suppl.  p.  132. 
Tartar,  V.  (1941b):   Intracellular  patterns:   Facts  and  principles  con- 
cerning patterns  exhibited  in  the  morphogenesis  and  regeneration  of 

ciliate  protozoa.  Growth  (suppl.)  5,  21-40. 
Tartar,  V.  (1950):  Methods  for  the  study  and  cultivation  of  protozoa. 

In,    Studies   Honoring    Trevor   Kincaid,    (Edited    by   M.    E.    Hatch), 

University  of  Washington  Press,  Seattle. 
Tartar,  V.  (1953):  Chimeras  and  nuclear  transplantations  in  ciliates, 

Stentor  coeruleus   X    S .  polymorphus .  J .  Exptl.  Zool.  124,  63-104. 
Tartar,    V.    (1954):    Reactions    of    Stentor    coeruleus    to    homoplastic 

grafting.  Ibid.  127,  511-576. 
Tartar,    V.    (1956a):    Grafting    experiments    concerning    primordium 

formation  in  Stentor  coeruleus.  Ibid.  131,  75-122. 
Tartar,  V.  (1956b):  Further  experiments  correlating  primordium  sites 

with  cytoplasmic  pattern  in  Stentor  coeruleus.  Ibid.  132,  269-298. 


388  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

Tartar,   V.    (1956c):    Pattern   and   substance   in    Stentor.    In    Cellular 

Mechanisms  in  Differentiations  and  Growth  (Edited  by  D.  Rudnick), 

Princeton  University  Press. 
Tartar,  V.  (1957a):  Reactions  of  Stentor  coeruleus  to  certain  substances 

added  to  the  medium.  Exptl.  Cell  Research.  13,  317-332. 
Tartar,  V.  (1957b):  Equivalence  of  macronuclear  nodes.  J.  Exptl.  Zool. 

135,  387-402. 
Tartar,  V.  (1957c):  Deletion  experiments  on  the  oral  primordium  of 

Stentor  coeruleus.  Ibid.  136,  53-74. 
Tartar,  V.  (1958a):  Stentor  introversus,  n.  sp.  jf.  Protozoal,  5,  93-95. 
Tartar,  V.  (1958b):  Induced  resorption  of  oral  primordia  in  regenerating 

Stentor  coeruleus.  jf.  Exptl.  Zool.  139,  1-32. 
Tartar,   V.    (1958c):    Specific   inhibition   of  the   oral   primordium   by 

formed  oral  structures  in  Stentor  coeruleus.  Ibid.  139,  479-505. 
Tartar,   V.   (1959a):   Equational  division  of  carbohydrate  reserves  in 

Stentor  coeruleus.  Ibid,  140,  269-280. 
Tartar,  V.  (1959b):  Effects  of  misorientation  by  rotation  of  the  ecto- 

plasmic  pattern  of  S.  coeruleus.  (Abstr.)  J.  Protozoal.  Suppl.  6,  32. 
Tartar,  V.  (1959c):  Division  of  the  macronucleus  in  Stentor  coeruleus 

with  regard  to  nodulation.  (Abstr.)  Ibid.  6,  32. 
Tartar,    V.    (i959d):    New   findings   on   oral   regeneration   in   Stentor 

coeruleus.  (Abstr.)  Ibid.  6,  32. 
Tartar,  V.  (19596):  Persisting  division  in  Stentor  coeruleus  regardless 

of  removal  of  parts.  (Abstr.)  Anat.  Rec.  Suppl.  134,  644. 
Tartar,  V.  (i959f) :  A  reproducible  lethal  abnormality  in  Stentor  coeruleus. 

(Abstr.)  Anat.  Rec.  Suppl.  134,  645. 
Tartar,  V.   (i959g):   Some  eflfects  of  altered  nucleo-plasmic  ratio  in 

Stentor  coeruleus.  (Abstr.)  Ibid.  134,  645. 
Trembley,  a.  ( 1 744) :  Translation  of  a  letter  from  Mr.  Abraham  Trembley, 

F.R.S.,    to    the    President,    with    observations    upon    several    newly 

discovered   species   of  fresh  water  polypi.   Phil.    Trans.   Royal  Soc. 

(London)  43,  169-183. 
Tuffrau,^M.  (1957):  Les  facteurs  essentiels  du  phototropisme  chez  le 

Cilie  heterotriche  Stentor  niger.  Bull.  Soc.  Zool.,  France  82,  354-356. 
Turner,  J.   P.   and  P.   Brandwein   (1937):    (Culture  of  Stentor).    In, 

Culture  Methods  for  Invertebrates,  (Edited  by  P.  Galtsoff  et  al.)  Ithica, 

New  York,  pp.  60-64. 
Uhlig,  G.  (1959):  Polaritatsabhangige  Anlagenentwicklung  bei  Stentor 

coeruleus.  Z.  Naturforsch.  Tilbigen.  14b,  353-354. 
Uhlig,    G.    (i960):    Entwicklungsphysiologische    Untersuchungen    zur 

Morphogenese   von   Stentor  coeruleus  Ehrbg.    (Doctoral  dissertation, 

Tiibigen  Univ.)  Arch.  Protistenk.  105,  1-109. 
Verworn,    M.    (1892):    Die   physiologische   Bedeutung   des    Zellkerns. 

Pfiiiger's  Archiv.  51,  1-118. 
Villeneuve-Brachon,  Simone  (1940):  Recherches  sur  les  cilies  hetero- 

triches,    cinetome,    argyrome,   myonemes,    formes   nouvelles   ou   peu 

connues.  Arch.  Zool.  exper.  et  gen.  82,  1-180. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY    OF    STENTOR  389 

Weisz,  p.  B.  (1948a):  Time,  polarity,  size  and  nuclear  content  in  the 
regeneration  of  Stentor  fragments.  J.  Exptl.  Zool.  107,  269-287. 

Weisz,  P.  B.  (1948b):  The  role  of  carbohydrate  reserves  in  the  regenera- 
tion of  Stentor  fragments.  Ibid.  108,  263-278. 

Weisz,  P.  B.  (1948c):  On  the  growth  of  regenerating  fragments  in  Stentor 
coeruleus.  Ibid.  109,  427-437. 

Weisz,  P.  B.  (i948d):  Regeneration  in  Stentor  and  the  gradient  theory. 
Ibid.  109,  439-449. 

Weisz,  P.  B.  (1949a):  A  cytochemical  and  cytological  study  of  differentia- 
tion in  normal  and  reorganizational  stages  oi  Stentor  coeruleus.  Jf.  Morph. 

84,  335-363- 
Weisz,  P.  B.  (1949b):  Phosphatases  in  normal  and  reorganizing  Stentors. 

Biol.  Bidl.  97,  108-110. 
Weisz,  P.  B.  (1949c):  The  role  of  specific  macronuclear  nodes  in  the 

differentiation    and    the   maintenance    of   the    oral    area    in    Stentor. 

y.  Exptl.  Zool.  Ill,   141-156. 
Weisz,  P.  B.  (1950a):  On  the  mitochondrial  nature  of  the  pigmented 

granules  in  Stentor  and  Blepharisnta.  J.  Morph.  86,  177-184. 
Weisz,  P.  B.  (1950b):  A  correlation  between  macronuclear  thymonucleic 

acid   concentration   and   the   capacity  of  morphogenesis   in   Stentor. 

Ibid.  87,  275-286. 
Weisz,  P.  B.  (1951a):  Homoplastic  grafting  in  Stentor  coeruleus.  Biol.  Bull. 

100,  1 16-126. 
Weisz,  P.  B.   (1951b):  An  experimental  analysis  of  morphogenesis  in 

Stentor  coeruleus.  J.  Exptl.  Zool.  116,  231-257. 
Weisz,  P.  B.  (1951c):  A  general  mechanism  of  differentiation  based  on 

morphogenetic  studies  in  ciliates.  Am.  Naturalist  85,  293-311. 
Weisz,  P.  B.  (1953):  The  embryologist  and  the  protozoon.  Scientific 

American  188,  76-82. 
Weisz,  P.  B.  (1954):  Morphogenesis  in  protozoa.  Quart.  Rev.  Biol.  29, 

207-229. 
Weisz,   P.   B.   (1955):   Chemical  inhibition  of  regeneration  in  Stentor 

coeruleus.  J.  Cell.  Comp.  Physiol.  46,  517-527. 
Weisz,  P.  B.  (1956):  Experiments  on  the  initiation  of  division  in  Stentor 

coeruleus.  y.  Exptl.  Zool.  131,  137-162. 
Wetzel,    A.    (1925):    Vergleichende    cytologische    Untersuchungen    an 

Ciliaten.  Arch.  Protistenk.  51,  207-304. 
Whiteley,  a.  H.  (1956):  Respiratory  patterns  in  regenerating  nucleate 

and  enucleate  fragments  of  Stentor  coeruleus.  (Abstr.)  J.  Cell.  Comp. 

Physiol,  48,  344-345. 
Whiteley,   A.   H.   (i960):   (Same  titled    C.R.    Trav.    Lab.    Carlsberg. 

(In  press). 
Worcester,  G.  W.  (1884):  Life  history  oi  Stentor  coeruleus.  Proc.  Centr. 

Ohio  Sci.  Assoc,  i,  97.  (Dubious). 
WORLEY,  L.  G.  (1934):  Ciliary  metachronism  and  reversal  in  Paramecium, 

Spirostomum  and  Stentor.  J.  Cell.  Comp.  Physiol.  5,  53-72. 


390  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

Zhinkin,   L.   (1930):  Zur  frage  der  Reservestoffe  bei   Infusorien  (Fett 

und  Glykogen  bei  Stentor  polymorphiis).   Z.    Morph.    u.    Okol.    Tiere. 

(Z.  wissenschaftliche  Biologie,  Abteilung  A.)  18,  217-248. 
Zhinkin,  L.  and  P.  Obraztsov  (1930):  (Ecology  of  Stentor  polymorphus 

and  Stentor  coeruleus.)  Russian  with  German  summary.  Hydrobiol.  Z. 

USSR.  9,  151-153.  (Not  seen.) 
ZiNGHER,  J.   A.    (1933):   Beobachtung  an   Fetteinschliissen  bei   einigen 

Protozoen.  Arch.  Protistenk.  81,  57-87. 
ZiNGHER,  J.  A.  and  W.  W.  Fisikow  (1931):  Biometrische  Untersuchungen 

an  Infusorien.   i.  Uber  die  Mittelgrosse  von  Stentor  coeruleus  Ehrbg. 

Ibid.  73,  482-486. 


OTHER   REFERENCES   CITED 

Andrews,  E.  A.  (1923):  Folliculina:  case-making,  anatomy  and  trans- 
formation, y.  Morph.  38,  207-277. 
Andrews,  E.  A.  (1947):  Temperature  effect  upon  rate  of  feeding  in  a 

folliculinid.  Physiol.  Zool.  20,  1-4. 
Andrews,  E.  A.  (1949):  Folliculinid  life-cycle.^.  Morph.  84,  401-409. 
Berglas,  a.  (1957):  Cancer:  Nature,  Cause  and  Cure.  Inst.  Pasteur,  Paris. 
Bohr,  N,  (1958):  Atomic  Physics  and  Human  Knozvledge.  New  York. 
Bonner,  J.  T.  (1954) :  The  development  of  cirri  and  bristles  during  binary 

fission  in  the  ciliate  Euplotes  eurystomus  J.  Morph.  95,  95-108. 
Bonner,   J.   T.    (1958):     The    Evolution    of    Development.     Cambridge 

University  Press,  England. 
Bracket,  J.  (1955):  Recherches  sur  les  interactions  biochimiques  entre 

le  noyau  et  le  cytoplasme  chez  les  organismes  unicellulaires.  Biochim. 

Biophys.  Acta  18,  247-268. 
Briggs,  R.  and  T.  J.  King  (1955):  Specificity  of  nuclear  function  in 

embryonic  development.  In,  Biological  Specificity  and  Growth  (Edited 

by  E.  G.  Butler),  Princeton  University  Press. 
Bronsted,  H.  V.  (1955):  Planarian  regeneration.  Biol.  Rev.  30,  65-126. 
Calkins,  G.  N.  (1911a):  Regeneration  and  cell  division  in  Uronychia. 

jf.  Exptl.  Zool.  10,  95-116. 
Calkins,  G.  N.  (1911b):  Effects  produced  by  cutting  Paramecium  cells. 

Biol.  Bidl.  21,  36-72. 
Chatton,  E.  and  A.  Lwoff  (1935a):  Les  Cilies  apostomes.  I.  Apergu 

historique  et  general ;  etude  monographique  des  genres  et  des  especes. 

Arch.  Zool.  exp.  et  gen.  77,  1-453. 
Chatton,  E.  and  A.  Lwoff  (1935b):  La  constitution  primitive  de  la 

strie  ciliare  des  infusoires.  La  desmodexie.  C.R.  Soc.  Biol.,  Paris  118, 

1068-1072. 


REFERENCES  39I 

Chatton,  E.  and  Josephine  Seguela  (1940):  La  continuite  genetique 

des  formations  ciliares  chez  les  cilies  hypotriches.    Le  cinetome  et 

I'argyrome  au  cours  de  la  division.  Bull.  Biol,  de  France-Belg.  74,  1-94. 
Chen,  Y.  T.  (1944):  Studies  on  the  neuromotor  systems  of  Stylonychia 

pustiilata  and  Stylonychia  mytilus.  J.  Morph.  75,  335-345. 
Child,  C.  M.  (1941):  Patterns  and  Problems  of  Development.  University 

of  Chicago  Press. 
CiENKOWSKi,  L.  (1865):  Beitrage  zur  Kenntnis    der   Monaden.    Arch. 

mikr.  Anat.  i,  201-232.  (Not  seen.) 
CoMANDON,  J.  and  P.  de  Fonbrune  (1939a):  Ablation  du  noyau  chez  une 

Amibe.  Reactions  cinetiques  a  la  piqure  de  I'amibe  normal  ou  denucleie. 

C.R.  Soc.  Biol.,  Paris  130,  740-744. 
CoMANDON,  J.  and  P.  de  Fonbrune  (1939b):   Greffe  nucleaire  totale, 

simple,  ou  multiple,  chez  un  Amibe.  Ibid.  130,  744-748. 
Danielli,  J.  F.  (1958):  Studies  of  inheritance  in  amoebae  by  the  technique 

of  nuclear  transfer.  Proc.  Roy.  Soc.  (London)  B  148,  321-331. 
Danielli,  J.  F.  (1959):  The  cell-to-cell  transfer  of  nuclei  in  Amoeba  and 

a  comprehensive  cell  theory.  Ann.  N.  Y.  Acad.  Sci.  78,  675-687. 
Danielli,  J.  F.,  I.  J.  Lorch,  M.  J.  Ord,  and  E.  G.  Wilson  (1955): 

Nucleus  and  cytoplasm  in  cellular  inheritance.  Nature  176,  1114. 
Daniels,   E.  W.   (195 i):   Studies  on  the  effect  of  x-irradiation  upon 

Pelomyxa  carolinensis  with  special  reference  to  nuclear  division  and 

plasmotomy.  J.  Exptl.  Zool.  117,  189-210. 
Delbruck,  M.  and  W.  Reichardt  (1956):  System  analysis  for  the  light 

growth  reactions  of  Phycomyces.  In,  Cellular  Mechanisms  in  Differen- 
tiation and  Growth  (Edited  by  Rudnick),  Princeton  University  Press. 
Dembowska,  W.  S.  (1938):  Korperreorganisation  von  Stylonychia  mytilus 

beim  Hungem.  Arch.  Protistenk.  91,  89-105. 
Demeric,    M.    (1934):    Biological   action    of  small   deficiencies   of  X- 

chromosome    of   Drosophila   melanogaster.    Proc.    Natl.    Acad.    Sci., 

U.S.  20,  354-359. 

Ehret,  C.  F.,  and  E.  L.  Pov^rs  (1959):  The  cell  surface  of  Paramecium. 

Intern.  Rev.  Cytol.  8,  97-133. 
Elsasser,  W.  M.  (1958):  The  Physical  Foundation  of  Biology.  Pergamon 

Press,  London  and  New  York. 
Ephrussi,  B.  (1953):  Nucleo-cytoplasmic  Relations  in  Micro-organisms. 

Oxford  University  Press. 
Faure-Fremiet,  E.  (1932):  Division  et  morphogenese  chez  Folliculina 

ampulla  O.  F.  Miiller.  Bull.  bioL,  France-Belg.  66,  77-110. 
Faure-Fremiet,  E.  (1945a):    Symetrie  et  polarite  chez  les  cilies  bi-ou 

multi-composites.  Ibid.  79,  106-150. 
Faure-Fremiet,    E.    (1948a):    Doublets    homopolaires    et    regulation 

morphogenetique  chez  le  cilie  Leucophrys  patula.  Arch.  Anat.  micros. 

et  Morphol.  exper.  37,  183-203. 
Faure-Fremiet,  E.  (1948b):  Les  mecanismes  de  la  morphogenese  chez 

les  Cilies.  Folia  Biotheoretica  3,  25-58. 


392  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

Faure-Fremiet,  E.  (1949):  Action  du  lithium  sur  la  stometogenese  chez 

les  Cilies.  Belg.-NederL  Cytoemhryol.  Dagen.  Genet.  1949,  100-102. 
Faure-Fremiet,  E.  (1950):  Probleme  moleculaire  de  la  morphogenese. 

Ann.  Biol.  26,  361-379. 
Faure-Fremiet,  E.  (1954):  Les  problemes  de  la  differentiation  chez  les 

protistes.  Bull.  Soc.  zool.  France  79,  311-329. 
Faure-Fremiet,  E.  and  H.  Mugard  (1948):  Segregation  d'un  materiel 

cortical  au  cours  de  la  segmentation  chez  I'oeuf  de  Teredo  norvegica. 

C.R.  Acad.  Sci.,  Paris  227,  1405-1411. 
Fawcett,  D.  W.  and  K.  R.  Porter  (1954):  A  study  of  the  fine  structure 

of  ciliated  epithelia.  jf.  Morph.  94,  221-281. 
Garnjobst,   Laura  (1937):   A   comparative   study  of  protoplasmic  re- 
organization   in    two    hypotrichous    ciliates,    Stylonethes    sterkii    and 

Euplotes  taylori,  with  special  reference  to  encystment.  Arch.  Protistenk. 

89,  317-381. 
Gelei,  J.  V.  (1936):   Das  erregungsleitende  System  der  Ciliaten.  C.R. 

I2th  Congres  Internat.  de  Zool.  (Lisbonne,  1935)  i,  174-206. 
GlESE,  A.  C.  (1938):  Cannibalism  and  gigantism  in  Blepharisma.  Trans. 

Am.  Micros.  Soc.  57,  245-255. 
GiESE,  A.   C.   (1949):  A  cytotoxin  from  Blepharisma.   Biol.  Bull.,  87, 

145-149. 
GiESE,  A.  C.  (1957):  Photodynamic  effect  of  Blepharisma  pigment  on 

nerve.  J.  Cell.  Comp.  Physiol.  49,  295-302. 
GiESE,  A.  C.  and  R.  H.  Alden  (1938):  Cannibalism  and  giant  formation 

in  Stylonychia.  jf.  Exptl.  Zool.  78,  11 7-1 34. 
GOLDSCHMIDT,  R.  (1940):  Chromosomes  and  genes.   In,   The  Cell  and 

Protoplasm,  (Edited  by  F.  R.  Moulton),  Science  Press,  Washington, 

D.C.,  pp.  56-66. 
GuSTAFSON,  T.  (1954):  Enzymatic  aspects  of  embryonic  differentiation. 

Intern.  Rev.  Cytol.  3,  277-327. 
HAmmerling,    J.     (1953):     Nucleo-cytoplasmic    relationships    in    the 

development  of  Acetabularia.  Intern.  Rev.  Cytol.  2,  475-498. 
Hammond,  D.  M.  (1937):  The  neuromotor  system  of  Euplotes  patella 

during   binary  fission   and   conjugation.    Quart.  J.   Micros.    Sci.   79, 

507-557. 
Hartmann,    M.    (1928):    Ueber    experimentelle    Unsterblichkeit    von 

Protozoen-Individuen.  Zool.  Jahrh.  45,  973-987. 
HoFER,  B.  (1890):  Experimentelle  Untersuchungen  iiber  den  Einfiuss 

des  Kerns  auf  das  Protoplasma.  Jena.  Z.  Naturwiss.  24,  105-176. 
Holmes,  S.  J.  (1907):  The  behaviour  oi  Loxophyllum  and  its  relation  to 

regeneration.  J.  Exptl.  Zool.  4,  399-430. 
Holtfreter,  J.   (1949):   Phenomena  relating  to  the  cell  membrane  in 

embryonic  processes.  Exptl.  Cell  Research,  Suppl.  i  (1949),  497-5  lO- 
Horning,  E.  S.  (1927):  On  the  orientation  of  mitochondria  in  the  surface 

cytoplasm  of  Infusorians.  Austral.  J.  Exptl.  Biol.  Med.  4,  187-190. 


REFERENCES  393 

HoRSTADius,  S.  (1950):  Transplantation  experiments  to  elucidate  inter- 
actions and  regulations  within  the  gradient  system  of  the  developing 

sea  urchin  egg.  J.  Exptl.  Zool.  113,  245-276. 
Jones,  E.  E.,  Jr.  (195 1):  Encystment,  excystment,  and  the  nuclear  cycle 

in  the  ciliate  Dileptus  anser.  J.  Elisha  Mitchell  Sci.  Soc.  67,  205-218. 
Klein,  B.  M.  (1932):  Das  Ciliensystem  in  seiner  Bedeutung  fiir  Loko- 

motion,    Koordination    und    Formbildung    mit    besonderer    Beriick- 

sichtigung  der  Ciliaten.  Ergebn.  d.  Biol.  8,  75-179. 
Lewin,  K.  R.  (1911-12):  The  behaviour  of  the  infusorian  micronucleus 

in  regeneration.  Proc.  Roy.  Soc.  {London)  B84,  332-344. 
LiLLiE,    F.    R.    (1906):    Observations   and   experiments   concerning   the 

elementary   phenomena   of  embryonic   development   in    Chcetopterus. 

y.  Exptl.  Zool.  3,  153-268. 
LoEFER,  J.  B.  (1936):  Isolation  and  growth  characteristics  of  the  "  Zooch- 

lorella  "  of  Paramecium  bursaria.  Am.  Naturalist  70,  184-188. 
LoRCH,  I.  Joan  and  J.  F.  Danielli  (1950) :  Transplantation  of  nuclei  from 

cell  to  cell.  Nature  166,  329-330. 
LoRCH,  I.  Jo.\N  and  J.  F.  Danielli  (1953):  Nuclear  transplantation  in 

Amoeba.   I.   Some  species  characters  of  Amoeba  proteus  and  Amoeba 

discoides.  Quart.  J.  Micros.  Sci.  94,  445-460. 
Lucas,  Miriam  S.  (1932) :  The  cytoplasmic  phases  of  rejuvenescence  and 

fission  in   Cyathodiunium  piriforme.   II.  A  type  of  fission  heretofore 

undescribed  for  ciliates.  Arch.  Protistenk.  'j'j^  407-472. 
Lund,  E.  E.  (1935):  The  neuromotor  system  of  Oxytricha.  jf.  Morph.  58, 

257-277- 
Lund,  E.  J.  (1914):  The  relations  of  Bursaria  to  food.  J.  Exptl.  Zool.  16, 

1-52;   17,   1-39. 
Lund,    E.    J.    (1917-18):    Reversibility  of  morphogenetic  processes   in 

Bursaria.  J.  Exptl.  Zool.  24,  1-33. 
LwoFF,  A.  (1950):  Problems  of  Morphogenesis  in  Ciliates.  Wiley,  New 

York. 
McDouGALL,  W.  (1938):  The  Riddle  of  Life.  Methuen,  London. 
Marsland,    D.    a.    (1943):    Quieting   Paramecium   for   the   elementary 

student.  Science  98,  414. 
Mast,  S.  O.  (1909):  The  reactions  of  Didinium  nasutum  (Stein)  with 

special  reference  to  the  feeding  habits  and  functions  of  the  trichocysts. 

Biol.  Bull.  16,  91-118. 
Mazia,  D.  (1952):  Physiology  of  the  cell  nucleus.  In  Modern  Trends  in 

Physiology  and  Biochemistry  (Edited  by  E.  S.  G.  Barron),  New  York, 

pp.  77-122. 
MoNNE,  L.  (1948):  Functioning  of  the  cytoplasm.  Advances  in  Enzy- 

mology  8,  1-65. 
Moore,  A.  R.  (1945):   The  Individual  in  Simpler  Forms.  University  of 

Oregon  Press. 
MuGARD,  Helene  (1947):  Division  et  morphogenese  chez  les  Ophryo- 

glenes.  C.R,  Acad.  Sci.,  Paris  225,  70-72. 


394  THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 

MuGARD,  Helene  (1948):  Regulation  du  nombre  des  cineties  au  cours  du 

cycle  de  croissance  et  de  division  chez  un  cilie:  Ichthyophthirsus  multi- 

filies  Fouguet.  Arch.  d'Anat.  micros.  37,  204-213. 
MuGARD,  Helene  (1957):  L'infraciliature  chez  la  larve  d'Oursin  Paracen- 

trotus  lividus.  Bull  Soc.  Zool.  France  82,  81-88. 
Nadler,  J.  E.  (1929):  Notes  on  the  loss  and  regeneration  of  the  pellicle 

in  Blepharisma  iindidans.  Biol.  Bull.  56,  327-330. 
Needham,  J.  N.  (1933):  Dissociability  of  the  fundamental  processes  in 

ontogenesis.  Biol.  Rev.  8,  180-223. 
NusSBAUM,    M.    (1884):    Ober   spontane    und   kiinstliche    Zelltheilung. 

Sitzber.  niederrhein.  Ges.  Nat.-u.  Heilk.,  Bonn  41,  259-263. 
Ohler,  R.  (1922):  Die  Zellverbindungen  von  Paramecium  bursaria  mit 

Chlorella  vulgaris  und  anderen  Algen.  Arb.  Staatsinst.  exper.  Therapie 

Georg  Speyer  Haus  15.  (Not  seen.) 
Okada,  Y.    K.   (1930):   Transplantationsversuche  an  Protozoen.  Arch. 

Protistenk.  69,  39-94. 
Parducz,   B.   (1953):   Zur  Mechanik  der  Zilienbewegung.   Acta  Biol., 

Acad.  Sri.  Hungari  4,  177-220. 
Parker,  G.  H.  (1929):  The  neurofibril  hypothesis.  Quart.  Rev.  Biol.  4, 

155-178. 
Pringsheim,   E.   G.   (1928):   Physiologische  Untersuchungen  an  Para- 
mecium bursaria.  Ein  Beitrag  zur  Symbioseforschung.  Arch.  Protistenk. 

64,  289-418. 
Raven,  C.  P.  (1949):  The  influence  of  lithium  on  the  development  of  the 

pond  snail,  Limncca  stagnalis  L.  Exptl.  Cell  Research,  Suppl.  i,  542-544. 
Reynolds,   Mary   E.    C.    (1932):     Regeneration  in  an  amicronucleate 

infusorian.  J^.  Exptl.  Zool.  62,  327-361, 
Robertson,    T.    B.    (1925):    The   influence   of  certain   dyes   upon   the 

multiplication  of  Infusoria  (Enchelys)  with  special  reference  to  the 

acridine  dyes  (Acriflavine  and  Proflavine).  Austral,  jf.  Exptl.  Biol.  Med. 

Sci.  2,  21-44. 
Roque,  Marie  (1956):  La  ciliature  buccale  pendant  I'autogamie  et  la 

conjugaison  chez  Paramecium  aurelia.  C.R.  Acad.  Sci.,  Paris,  242,  2592. 
Rose,  S.  M.  (1957):  Cellular  interaction  during  differentiation.  Biol.  Revs. 

32,  351-382. 
Roth,  L.  E.  (1956):  Aspects  of  ciliary  fine  structure  in  Euplotes  patella. 

y.  Biophys.  Biochem.  Cytol.  2,  (Suppl.),  235-240. 
ScHMAHL,  O.  (1926):  Die  Neubildung  des  Peristoms  bie  der  Teilung 

von  Bursaria  truncatella.  Arch.  Protistenk.  54,  359-430. 
ScHV^ARTZ,  V.  (1947):  Uber  die  Physiologic  des  Kerndimorphismus  bei 

Paramecium  bursaria.  Z.  Naturforsch.  26,  369-381. 
SoKOLOFF,  B.  (1913):  Contribution  au  probleme  de  la  regeneration  des 

Protozoaires.   C.R.  des  Seances  et  Memoires  de  la  Soc.  de  Biol.  75, 

297-301. 
SoKOLOFF,  B.  (1934):  Vitality.  Dutton,  New  York, 


REFERENCES  395 

SoNNEBORN,  T.  M.  (1932):  Experimental  production  of  chains  and  its 
genetic  consequences  in  the  ciliate  protozoan,  Colpidium  covipyhim 
(Stokes).  Biol  Bull.  63,  187-211. 

SoNNEBORN,  T.  M.  (1947):  Recent  advances  in  the  genetics  of  Para- 
mecium and  Euplotes.  Advances  in  Genetics  i,  263-358, 

SoNNEBORN,  T.  M.  (1951):  The  role  of  genes  in  cytoplasmic  inheritance. 
In,  Genetics  in  the  20th  Century  (Edited  by  L.  C.  Dunn).  Macmillan, 
New  York,  pp.  291-314. 

Sterki,  V.  (1878):  Beitrage  zur  Morphologic  der  Oxytrichinen.  Z.  wiss. 
Zool.  31,  28-58. 

Suzuki,  S.  (1957):  Morphogenesis  in  the  regeneration  of  Blepharisma 
undulans  japonicus  Suzuki.  Bull.  Yamagata  Univ.,  Nat.  Sci.  4,  85-192. 

SwANN,  M.  M.  (1954):  The  control  of  cell  division.  In,  Recent  Develop- 
ments in  Cell  Physiology.  London. 

Tartar,  V.  (1940):  Nuclear  reactions  in  Paraynecium.  (Abstr.)  Anat.  Rec. 
78,  (Suppl.),  109. 

Tartar,  V.  (1954) :  Anomalies  in  regeneration  oi  Paramecium .  J .  Protozool. 

1,11-17- 
Taylor,  C.  V.  (1928):  Protoplasmic  reorganization  in  Uronychia  uncinata 

sp.  nov.  during  binary  fission  and  regeneration.  Physiol.  Zool.  i,  1-25. 
Taylor,  C.  V.  and  W.  P.  Parser  (1924):  Fatal  effects  of  the  removal  of 

the  micronucleus  in  Euplotes.  Univ.  Calif.  Publ.  Zool.  26,  1 31-144. 
Turner,  J.  P.  (1940) :  Cytoplasmic  inclusions  in  Tillina  canalifera  Turner. 

Arch.  Protistenk.  93,  255-272. 
VisscHER,  J.  P.  (1923):  Feeding  reactions  in  the  ciliate,  Dileptus  gigas, 

with  special  reference  to  the  function  of  the  trichocysts.  Biol.  Bull.  45, 

113-143- 
Weisz,  p.  B.  (1949):  The  role  of  the  macronucleus  in  the  differentiation 

of  Blepharisma  undulans.  jf.  Morph.  85,  503-518. 
Whitman,  O.  C.  (1893):  The  inadequacy  of  the  cell  theory  of  develop- 
ment, jf.  Morph.  8,  639-658. 
WoODGER,  J.  H.  (1929):  Biological  Principles.  London. 
WoRLEY,  L.  G.  (1933):  The  intracellular  fibre  systems  of  Paramecium. 

Proc.  Natl.  Acad.  Sci.,  U.S.,  19,  323-326. 
Yagiu,  R.  (1951):    Studies  on  Condylostoma  spatiosum  Ozaki  and  Yagiu. 

III.   The  relationship  of  the  quantity  of  the  macronucleus  and  the 

power  of  division.  J.  Sci.,  Hiroshima  Univ.,  Series  B,  Div.  i,  12, 121-130. 
Yagiu,  R.  (1952):  Studies  on  Condylostoma  spatiosum  Ozaki  and  Yagiu. 

V.  Abnormal  phenomena  caused  by  being  kept  in  fresh  water.  Ibid.  13, 

92-109. 
Yow,   F.  W.   (1958):  A  study  of  the  regeneration  pattern  of  Euplotes 

eurystomus.  J.  Protozool.  5,  84-88. 
YuSA,   A.    (1957):   The  morphology  and  morphogenesis   of  the  buccal 

organelles  in  Paramecium  with  particular  reference  to  their  systematic 

significance.  J.  Protozool.  4,  128-142. 
Zeleny,  C.  (1905):  The  relation  of  the  degree  of  injury  to  the  rate  of 

regeneration.  J.  Exptl.  Zool.  2,  347-369. 

*AA 


AUTHOR     INDEX 


Adolph,     380 
Allescher,     261,  292,  293 
Alverdes,     24 
Andresen,     48 

Andrews,  13,  14,  15,  34,  36,  37, 
38,  40,  41,  42,  44,  45,  47,  56, 

160,  250,  266,  338 

Balamuth,     147 

Balbiani,  74,  84,  91,  98,  100, 
102,  111,  113,  123,  196,  206, 
209,  267,  273,  286,  293,  300, 
301,  302,  303,  304,  305,  323, 
336,  348 

Barbier,  Faure-Fremiet  and 
Lederer,     47 

Bary,     335,  337 

Belda  and  Bowen,     346 

Berglas,     215 

Bishop,     287 

Bohr,     378 

Bonner,     122,  195 

Brachet,     133,  302,  303 

Brauer,     32,  63,  65 

Briggs  and  King,     309 

Bronsted,     89,  201 

Bullington,     1 7 

BuRNSiDE,     305,  347 

BuTSCHLi,     43,  58 

Calkins,     206,  280 
Causin,     54,    82,    100,    108,    113, 
116,    121,    129,    153,    155,    156, 

161,  179,  188,  196,  304 
Chambers    and    Kao,     245,    246, 

353 
Chatton  and  Lwoff,     50,  367 
Chatton  and  Seguela,     160 
Chen,     33 


Child,     117,  118,  145,  195,  201, 

246,  247 
Cienkowski,     354 
Claparede    and    Lachmann,     42, 

273 
Comandon    and    De    Fonbrune, 

301,  305,  309,  319,  359 
Cox,     70 

Dabrowska,     24 

Daniel,     237,  248,  249,  251,  252 

Danielli,     319,  375 

Danielli,      Lorch,      Ord      and 

Wilson,     319 
Daniels,     3,  355 
Davenport  and  Neal,     248 
Dawson,     347 

Delbruck  and  Reichardt,     66 
Dembowska,     259,  303 
Demerec,     371 
De  Terra,     74,  84,  85,  266,  295, 

303,  323,  353 
DiERKS,     13,  14,  15,  24,  29,  30,  31, 

33,  34,  35,  36,  37,  38,  49,  52,  53, 

55,  66,  243 
Driesch,     170 

Ehrenberg,     333 

Ehret  and  Powers,  122,  180,  368 

Elsasser,     372 

Ephrussi,  375 

Faure-Fremiet,     46,  47,  111,  160, 

161,179,188,206,208,215,255, 

338,  364,  365,  366,  367 

Faure-Fremiet  and  Lederer,    382 

Faure-Fremiet  and  Mugard,   373 

Faure-Fremiet     and     Rouiller, 

31,49,  56,  57,  58 


396 


AUTHOR    INDEX 


397 


Faure-Fremiet,      Rouiller      and 
Gauchery,     44,  45,  49,  52,  53 
Fawcett  and  Porter,     31,  238 

Garnjobst,     377 

Gelei,     6,  14,  15,  16,  17,  34,  36, 

47,  49,  52,  55,  56,  240,  274,  322, 

342,  366 
Gelfan,     58 
Gerstein,     347 
GiESE,     17,  48,  347 
GiESE  and  Alden,     1 7 
goldschmidt,     67 
Greeley,     244 
Gruber,     37,  70,  74, 105, 120,  130, 

147,  152,  201,  226,  259,  286,  298, 

299,  304,  352,  355,  373 

GUSTAFSON,       256 

GuTTES  and  Guttes,  114,  115,  153 

Hamburger,     324,  325 
Hammerling,     22,  268,  269,  271, 

272,  297,  317,  346 
Hammond,     367 
Hartmann,     131,  259,  292 
Hausmann,     24 
Have,     40,  42 
Hegner,     342 
Heilbrunn,     245 
Hetherington,     99, 100, 156, 273, 

274,  346,  347,  348 
Hofer,     241,  301,  302 
Holmes,     21 
Holt  and  Lee,     23 
holtfreter,     374 
Horning,     46 
horstadius,     213 

HOWLAND,      273 
Hyman,     347 

IsHiKAWA,     53,  226,  240,  299 
IvANic,     15,  260,  322 

Jennings,    6,7,12,17,19,22,239 
Jennings  and  Jamieson,     17,  19, 

21 
Jennings  and  Moore,     22 


Johnson,  7,  12, 14, 15, 16,  25,  29, 
33,  37,  38,40,41,46,49,  52,  56, 
58,  63,  66,  70,  72,  73,  74,  75,  77, 
82,  92,  99,  102,  113,  116,  149, 
152, 153,  159,  163,  164,  206,  260, 
261,  262,  267,  274,  281,  286,  287, 
294,  323,  325,  333,  336,  337,  348 

Jones,     286 

Kahl,     25,  44,  334,  335 
Kalmus,     273 
Kent,     333 
Kessler,     267 
Kimball,     256 
Kirby,     273,  333 
Klein,     52,  365,  366 

Lankester,     46,  47,  48,  342 
Lewin,     114 
Lewis,     274 
Lieberkuhn,     48 
LiLLiE,     120,  213,  373 
Loeb,     244 

LOEFER,       267 

LoRCH  and  Danielli,     309,  312, 

319 
Lucas,     218 
Lund,  E.  E.,     30 
Lund,   E.  J.,     13,   91,   170,   188, 

220,  259 
LwoFF,     3.8,  67,  90,  159,  365,  367, 

368 

MCDOUGALL,      379 

Madlen,     384 
Maier,     29,  32,  47,  267,  336 
Marsland,     241,  349 
Mast,     23,  259 
Maupas,     41,  58,  259,  260 
Mazia,     375 
"  Meissner,     266 
Merton,     5,  19,  21,  239,  240,  243, 

348 
M0LLER,     48,  49,  291,  322,  323 
MONNE,      315 
MoNOD,     247 
Moore,     245 


398 

Morgan,  67,  99,  107,  110,  115, 
119,120,124,128,129,161,299, 
355 

MoxoN,  9,  30,  40,  44,  70,  161, 
163,  323 

MuGARD,     160,  225,  373 

MuGARD  and  Courtney,     241 

MULLER,      273 

MuLSOW,     323,  324,  325 

Nadler,     43,  250 

Needham,     378 

Neresheimer,     31,  33,  49,  54,  55, 

241,  242,  243,  250 
Nussbaum,     105 

Ohler,     272 

Okada,     355 

Oken,     333 

Otterstrom  and  Larsen,     274 

Packard,     81,  333 

Parducz,     19,  56 

Parisis,     242 

Park,     40,  57 

Parker,     371 

Penard,     336 

Peters,  239,  249,  250,  251,  345, 
347 

PopoFF,  52,  63,  74,  76,  81,  82, 
202,  260,  305,  306,  308 

Pringsheim,     268,  269,  272 

Prowazek,  12,  44,  47,  53,  81, 102, 
107,113,124,129,130,145,196, 
245,  250,  252,  260,  261,  267,  285, 
287,  291,  292,  293,  299,  300,  301, 
302,  304,  342,  346,  355,  375,  376 

Randall,     49,  50,  60,  238 
Randall  and  Jackson,  30,  31,  34, 

42,  45,  49,  53,  56,  57,  58,  76,  346, 

348 
Raven,     256 
Reynolds,     280 
Robertson,     132 
Roesle,     24 
Roque,     368 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Rose,     145 

RosKiN,     386 

RosKiN  and  Semenov,     265 

Roth,     30 

Schaeffer,     11,  13,  14,  21 
SchmAhl,     75,  159,  160,  169,  280, 
299,  303 

SCHMITT,       245 

Schonfeld,     273 

Schroder,     29,  30,  31,  33,  37,  38, 

43,  44,  49,  52,  55 
ScHUBERG,     6,  12,  15,  29,  30,  31, 

33,  36,  48,  56,  66,  70,  76,  160, 

164,  179,  250,  274 
ScHULZE,     22,  260,  268,  269,  271, 

272,  346 
schwalbe,     40 
Schwartz,     61,  70,  73,  75,  82,  84, 

87,91,93,95,101,102,103,111, 

113,130,153,160,163,164,186, 

266,  280,  287,  291,  300,  301,  302, 
304,  308,  323,  344,  347,  348 

SiLEN,      338 
SiMROTH,       30 

Sleigh,     13,   57,    234,    235,    236, 

346,  349 
Sokoloff,  B.,     107,  118,  119,  120, 

132,  201,  299,  305 
Sokoloff,  D.,     387 
SoNNEBORN,     206,  286,  375,  376 
SosNOWSKi,     260 
Sprugel,     265 

Stein,     25,  26,  30,  37,  70,  287,  323 
Sterki,     30 
Stevens,     29,  64,  67,  76,  84,  105, 

129,  161,  163,  165,  206,  301 
Stolte,     74,   88,    120,    260,    265, 

267,  274,  283,  285,  286,  293,  347 
Strom,     246,  346 

Suzuki,     84,   103,   114,  290,  355, 

361  et  seq. 
SWANN,      89 

Swarczewsky,     337 

Tartar,     30,  64,  70,  74,  79,  86,  89, 
91,92,98,99,100,101,107,110, 


AUTHOR     INDEX 


399 


Tartar,  {continued) 

111,112,116,117,118,119,121, 
125,129,  131,  135,136,139,142, 
145,146,148,149,152,156,161, 
164,169,170,174,175,176,178, 
180,  187, 188, 189, 190, 198,  203, 
206,  213,  216,  221,  227,  229,  237, 
238,  239,  240,  242,  252,  254,  263, 
265,  267,  277,  280,  287,  290,  300, 
301,  303,  304,  305,  306,  311,  312, 
313,317,320,343,349,355,365, 
366,  368,  370,  375,  376 

Taylor,     116,  119 

Taylor  and  Farber,     280 

Trembley,     70,  333 

Tuffrau,     23 

Turner,     46 

Turner  and  Brandwein,     347 

Uhlig,     115,  119,  174,  176,  184, 
202,   204,    208,    227,    230,    346 

Verworn,     240,  242,  309,  374 
Villeneuve-Brachon,     50,  52,  55, 

66,  75,  138,  159,  348 
ViSSCHER,      259 


Weisz,  17,  38,  40,  44,  45,  47,  52, 
57,  58,  59,  73,  75,  76,  77,  78,  79, 
80,  82,  83,  86,  88,  91,92,95,98, 
99,  100,  101,  102,  107,  108,  110, 
113,114,115,116,117,118,119, 
121,124,131,132,133,135,138, 
142,145,146,153,161,164,170, 
189,  196,  201,  202,  206,  221,  237, 
247,  250,  252,  260,  262,  263,  266, 
285,  286,  288,  289,  294,  295,  303, 
305,  306,  310,  347,  348,  349,  369, 
375 

Wetzel,     389 

Whiteley,     48,  133,  265,  345 

Whitman,     373 

WOODGER,      372 

Worcester,     389 
WoRLEY,     50,  238 

Yagiu,     84,  87,  188,  284,  287 
Yow,     113,  114 

YusA,     368 

Zeleny,     119 
Zhinkin,     262,  263 
Zhinkin  and  Obraztsov,     265 
Zingher,     264,  266 
ZiNGHER  and  FisiKOW,     257 


SUBJECT     INDEX 


Abnormal  stentors,  274  et  seq.,  316 
Abortive  development  of  primor- 

dium,     137,  139 
Acetahularia,     195,  297,  317,  319 
Acid  phosphatase,     266 
acrobaticus,     338 

Activation  and  inhibition,      \ZS  et 
seq. 

in  mincerates,     223 

in  relation  to  nodulation,     295 

in  relation  to  nuclear  behavior, 
294,  296 

site  of,  157 
Activation,     in    reorganizers     and 

dividers,     152 
Activation,  timing  of,     142  et  seq. 
Adaptation  to  stimuli,     21  et  seq. 
Advantages  of  stentor,     1  et  seq. 
amethystinus,     46,  267,  336 
Amoeba,     131,  246,  259,  292,  301, 

302,  303,  305,  309,  312,  319 
Amorphous  stentors,     277  et  seq. 
'*  Anarchic  field  ",     138 
Anesthesia  of  stentors,     238,   240 

et  seq. 
Antimetabolites,     132 
Astasia  captive,     273 
Astoinatous  individuals,     320 
Attachment,     6,  37  et  seq. 

in  enucleates,     301 
auricula,     338 
auriculata,     338 
auriculatus,     338 
Autogamy,     323 
Autolysis,     303 
Autonomous  disorganization,    224, 

255 
Autoradiography,     303,  353 


"  Autotomy  "  of  mouthparts,     98, 

209,  210 
Avoiding  reactions,     \9  et  seq. 

of  fragments,     21 

while  swimming,     22 
Axial  gradient,     195,  201,  246 

Basal  lamellae,     2>\  et  seq. 

function  of,     33,  238 
Behavior,     1 1 

of  enucleates,  301 
Biotypes,  205  et  seq. 
Blepharisma,     17,  43,  45,  46,  49, 

84,  103,  250,  252,  289,  290, 

349,  355 
comparison  with  stentors,     361 

et  seq. 
Border  stripes  of  frontal  field,     29, 

33,  163 
Bristles  or  stationary  cilia,     25,  337 
Broadening  of  stentors  in  LiCl,  256 
Bursaria,     13,   75,   91,    159,    160. 

169,  170,  220,  259,  280,  299, 

303,  305,  342 

Cancer  and  stentor,     3,  215,  276 
Cannibalism,  14,15  et  seq.,  218,322 
Carbohydrate  reserves,     263 

division  of,     79 

in  regeneration,     107,  131 

in  reorganization,     92 

use  by  enucleates,     302 
Carchesium,     242 
Case 

building,     7,  250 

in  relation  to  avoiding  reaction, 
21 
Cell  defined,     371,  372 
Cells  and  stentors,     59,  370 


400 


SUBJECT     INDEX 


401 


Chcetopterus,     373 
Chemicals,  effects  of 
acetates,     239,  252 
acriflavin,     132 
adenine,     132 
albumen,     252 
AICI3,     234 
ammonium  acetate,  252 
antimetabolites,     132 
atropine,     242 
azaguanine,     133 
CaCU,     237,  240,  243,  245,  246, 

251 
caffein,     242 
Ca(OH)2,     251 
CaS04,     251 

cations,  bivalent,     239,  245,  251 
cations,  monovalent,     239,  245, 

251 
chlorides,     252 
chloroform,     240,  251 
copper  salts,     243 
CsCl,     239 
curare,     242 
digitoxin,  234 
distilled  water,     239 
DNA,     58,  132,  289 
drugs,     55,  241 
ethanol,     237,  248,  252 
fatty  acids,     240 
folic  acid,     132 
glycerine,     249,  252 
guanine,  132 
HCl,     240,  249,  251 
HgCU,     248 

Holtfreter's  solution,     253 
hydrogen  ion,     246 
hydroxylamine  hydrochlorate, 

241 
iron  salts,     243 
Janus  green,     246,  250 
KAc,     239 
KBr,     239 
KCl,     239,  240,  243,  244,  245, 

246,  251 
KCN,     246,  247 
K2CO3,     239 


KH2PO4,     241 

KI,     239,  242 

KMn04,     247 

KNO3,     239,  251 

K2PO4,     239 

K2SO4,     239 

lactose,     251 

LiCl,     239,  251,  252,  255,  256 

methanol,     249 

methyl  cellulose,     241,351 

effects  of,     100,  145,  234,  349 

et  seq.,  352 
methyl  tyrosine,     133 
methylene  blue,     246,  250 
MgCls,     234,  237,  245 
MgS04,     251 
morphine,     242 
NaBr,     242 
NaCl,     239,  240,  244,  246,  248, 

250,  251,  252 
NaHCOs,     251 
Na2HP04,     251 
Nal,     237,  242 
NaOH,     249,  251 
Na2S04,     243,  251 
NH4AC,     239 
NH4CI,     239,  251,  252 
(NH4)2S04,     251 
nicotine,     242 
NiS04,     238,  240,  252 
oxygen,     265 
physostigmin,     242 
picrotoxin,     242 
potassium  ion,     55 
quinine,     248 
RbCl,     239 
Ringer's  solution,     243 
RNA,     132,  133 
RNAse,     133 
saponin,     240 
sea  v^ater,     252,  253,  255 
sodium  taurocholicum,     245 
SrCla,     245,  246 
strychnine,     242,  251 
sucrose,     253 

sugars,     239,  240,  244,  252,  254 
sulfates,     252 


402 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Chemicals  {continued) 

thiocystosine,     133 

thymine,     132 

tyrosine,  methyl,     133 

uracil,     132 

urea,     240,  252,  253 
Chemicals,    morphogenetic   effects 

of,     254 
Chimeras,     311 

abnormal  differentiation  in,    317 

in  Acetabularia,     317 

in  Amoeba,     319 

coeruleiis  X  introversus,     313 

coeruleus  X  multiformis,     314 

coeruleus  X  niger,     313,  317 

coeruleus  X  polymorphiis ,       278, 
313,  315  et  seq. 

coeruleus  X  roeseli,     313 

coeruleus  X  "X",     312 

depigmentation  in,     315,  317 

shape  reconstitution  of,     315 
Chlorella,     267,  271,  272,  315 

{see  symbiosis  with  green  algae) 

digestion  of,     12 

in  relation  to  light  response,     22 
Chromosomes,     see  conjugation 
Ciha,     56  et  seq. 

coordination  of,     238 

modifiability  of,     38 

in  relation  to  pseudopodia,     38 

sensory,     25 

shedding  of,     241 
Ciliary  beating,     56,163,250 

reversal  of,     238  et  seq. 
Ciliary  coordination,     15,19 
Ciliary  molting,     75 
Ciliated  vacuoles  and  tubes,     215 

et  seq. 
Clear  stripes,     49  et  seq. 

structure  of,     SO  et  seq. 
Clones,  development  of,     344 
Clumping  of  macronucleus,     284, 
294 

{see    macronucleus,    coalescence 
of) 

reasons  for,     286 


coeruleus  (referred  to  throughout) 

species  defined,     335 
Collecting  stentors,     339 
Colpidium,     48,  206,  266 
Comparison  with  other  ciliates,  see 
generic  names  of  other  ciliates 
Concentrating  stentors,     345 
Condylostomum,     IS,    84,    87,    91, 
107,  111,  169,  284,  287,  290, 
338,  376 
Conjugation,     323 

re  induction  of,     324 

in  coeruleus,     32S  et  seq. 

in  polymorphiis,     329  et  seq. 

possibilities  of  grafting  in,     332 

regeneration  during,     324 

of  three  individuals,     325 
Constriction 

in  dividers,     72 

of  macronucleus,     72 
Contractile  vacuole,     9 

in  enucleates,     301 

origin  of,     73 
Contractile  vacuole  system,     40  et 

seq. 
Contractility,     10,  14,  54,  241 

irreversibly  damaged,     309 
Contraction  of  cell  body,     52,  59 
Control  of  macronuclear  behavior, 

293  et  seq. 
Coordination  {see  metachronal  co- 
ordination) 

of  body  cilia,     238 

in  forming  daughter  cells,     74 

in  fusion  masses,     236 

in   membranellar   band,    232    et 
seq. 

in  membranelles,     234  et  seq. 

micrurgical  analysis  of,     27,  33 
Corrugations  of  pellicle,     6 
Cortex 

importance  of,     42 

structure  of,     42  et  seq. 
Cortical  pattern,     366,  373,  376 
Culturing,     342 

ionic  media,     345  et  seq. 

of  polymorphiis,     346 


SUBJECT     INDEX 


403 


Cutting  methods,     349 

Cya  thodinium,     218 

Cyclosis  of  endoplasm,     9,  91 ,  301 , 

325 
Cystment,     26 
Cytopyge,     40 
Cytostome,     36 

Defecation,     9,  40 

extrusion  of  clots,     246 

through  posterior  pore,     40 
Deformities,     226 

{see  amorphous  stentors) 

produced  by  x-ray,     257 
Depigmented  stentors,     274,  317 
Deployment  of  primordium,     137, 

163,  223 
Depression  in  cultures,     100 
Desmodexy,     50,  195 
Determination 

of  fission  line,     77,  79 

of  primordium,      170 
Didinium,     259 
Digestion,     266  et  seq. 

of  cannibal  meal,     16 

in  enucleates,     266,  302 

of  fats,     266 

inhibited  by  anaerobiosis,     266 

of  pigment,     17,47 

of  starch,     266 

of  symbionts,     267,  269,  272 
Dileptus,     120,  259,  286,  342 
Disarrangements  of  pattern,     226 

et  seq. 
Disintegration,  progressive 

in  certain  solutions,     246,   247, 
248,  253 

in  UV,     247 
Division,     67  et  seq. 

abnormalities  of,  88 

acceleration  of,     244,  249 

of  carbohydrate  reserves,     79 

dispensibility  of,     131 

endoplasmic  role  in,     88 

final  separation,     74 

herringbone  pattern  in  dividers, 
73 


incitement  to,     SI  et  seq. 

increase  of  macronuclear  nodes, 
74 

induction  of,     82 

inhibition  of,     257 

lacking  in  large  masses,     215 

of  longitudinal  halves,     84 

of  macronucleus,     295 

micronuclei  in,     74 

multiplication  of  stripes,     68 

new  and  old  parts  in,     75 

nuclear  changes  in,     72 

number  of  stripes  in  relation  to, 
63 

persistence  of,     84  et  seq 

postponed,     88,  131,  156 

primordium,     70  et  seq. 

proportional  adjustment  in,    124 

in  relation  to  differentiation,     89 

in  relation  to  size  (re  cannibals), 
215 

simultaneous,     346 

in  spite  of  injury  to  fission  line, 
87 

and  surface  tension,     90 

time,     74 

unequal,     79,  244 

uptake  of  P^^  in  division,     74, 
303 

without  macronucleus,     84,  87 

without  primordium,     85,  87 
Division  furrow,  see  fission  line 
Doubles  and  triples  defined,     207 
Doublets,     208 

formation  in  LiCl,     256 

macronuclei,     284 

multiplication  of,     208 

number  of  stripes,     64 

reversion  to  singles,     208,  210 
Doublets  and  triplets  defined,  207, 

208 
Drugs,  effects  of,     55 
Dwarf  stentors,     259  et  seq.,  305, 
320 

Ecological  considerations,    16,  265 
Ecto-endoplasmic  ratio,     107 


404 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Ectomyonemes,     50  et  seq. 
Ectoplasm 

etching  of,     169 
necessary  for  regeneration,     107 
reduction  of,     107 
totipotency  of,     161 
Ectoplasm  inside,     218 
Ectoplasmic    structures,     constant 

size  of,     121 
Eggs  and  embryos,  compared  with 
stentors,     59,  77,  89,  90,  213, 
221,  245,  256,  294,  309,  372 
et  seq. 
Ehrlich's  principle,     249 
Electrical  stimulus,     24 
Electrolyte  concentration,     58 

and  specific  conductance,     58 
Endomyonemes,     53 
Endoplasm 

clumping  of,     245 
coagulation  of,     246 
composition  of,     5S  et  seq. 
endoplasmic  vesicles,     58 
intimate  relation  to  M  bands,  54 
streaming    movements,     9,    44, 

91,  301,  325 
transparency  of,     320 
unimportant     in     regeneration, 

107,  108 
vacuolization   of,     54,    58,    260, 
265,  273,  284 
Enemies  of  stentor,     342 
Enucleates 

behavior  of,     301 

contractile  vacuole  in,     301 

defecation  in,     302 

digestion  in,     266,  302 

energy  metabolism  in,     301 

fission  of,     298 

healing  in,     299 

holdfast  in,     301 

maintenance  of  organelles  in,  303 

regeneration  in,     299 

resorption    of    primordium    in, 

144,  298 
shape  recovery  in,     299 
survival  of,     304 


Enucleation,     357 

Epidiniuniy     220 

Equivalence  of  macronuclear  nodes, 

289 
Etching  of  ectoplasm,     169 
Euplotes,     113,  267,  280,  286,  367 
Exceptions  to  induction  of  primor- 

dia  by  loci  of  stripe  contrast, 

191 
Excess  nucleus,  effects  of,     304 
Exchange  of  symbionts,     271 
Excretory  pores,     40,  41 
Extension  of  stentor  cell,     10,  14, 

54 

Fabrea,     138,  159,  164 
Fat  reserves,     263 
Feedback 

in  diflferentiation,     321 

in  regeneration,     116 
Feeding  behavior,  9,     19 

{see  feeding  vortex) 

{see  food  selection) 

ingestion,     36 
Feeding  organelles,     28  et  seq. 
Feeding  vortex,     6,  13 
felici,     44,  336 
Fission,  see  division 
Fission  line,     72 

across  irregular  striping,     230 

action  of,     76 

determination  of,     77,  79 

nature  of,     75,  87 

not  from  cutting  the  stripes,     88 

shifts  in  location,     79 

and  shifts  of  pigment  granules, 
76 
Fluorescent  coerideiis,     48,  322 

influence  of,     48,  49 
Fluorescent  pigment,     48 
Folliculina    or    FoUiculinids,     13, 
46,   47,   160,   164,    169,    250, 
266 
Food  organisms,     347 
Food  selection,     \\  et  seq. 

basis  of,     12,  13  et  seq. 

pre-oral,     1 3 


SUBJECT     INDEX 


405 


Food  vacuoles,     8 
Fragments 

behavior  of,     19,23,24 

with  head  only,     125 

minimum  size,     120 
Frontal  field,     7,  29  et  seq.,   139, 
163,  165 

border  stripes  of,     163 

origin  of,     70 

striping  of,     52 
Frontonia,     303,  368 
Function  of  the  macronucleus 

{see     nucleo-cytoplasmic     inter- 
actions) 

in  differentiation,     297 

lag  effects,     297 
Funnel,  oral,     7 
Fusion  masses,     205  et  seq. 

coordination  in,     236 

effect  of  orientation  on,     214 

incomplete  oral  differentiation  in, 
215 

large,     213  et  seq. 

reduction  of  oral  valency,     213 
et  seq. 

2-masses,     206 

tubes   and   ciliated  vacuoles  in, 
215  et  seq. 

gallinulus,     336 

Giants  not  formed,     213,  305 

Glaucoma,     355 

globator,     338 

Gradients 

axial,     195,  201,  246 

circumferential,     204 

in  foot  formation,     202 

metabolic,     246  et  seq. 

morphogenetic,     202  et  seq. 
Grafting  methods,     354 
Granular  stripes,     43  et  seq.,  21 A 

as  fill-ins,     44,  66,  169 
Granules,  cortical,  44  et  seq. 

origin  of,     46 
Granules,    pigment,    see    pigment 
granules 


Growth,     ()\  et  seq. 

of  fragments,     247 

of  macronucleus,     74 

of  primordium,     68 

spiral,     66 
Gullet,     8,  14,  34  et  seq. 

ciliation  of,     34 

eversion  of,     15,  34 

fibers  of,  36  et  seq. 

myonemes  of,     36 

pendent  fibers,     15 

peristalsis,     14 

vacuoles,     36 

Head  fragments,     125 
Healing,     226,  240,  246,  257,  299, 
352 

in  enucleates,     299 

of  membranellar  band,     129 

of  mouthparts,     99,  129 
Heat 

{see  temperature) 

perception  of,     24 

response  to,     24 
Henneguy-Lenhossek     hypothesis, 

115 
Herringbone   pattern   in   dividers, 

73 
Heteropolarity 

disharmonies  in,  199 

of  patches,     198 

resolution  of,     199 

resorption  in  relation  to,     198 
Holdfast,     31  et  seq. 

in  doublets,     208 

duplication  of,     111 

in  enucleates,     301 

formation  in  relation  to  striping, 
110 

induction,     203 

neo-formation  at  bend  of  strip- 
ing,    111 

regeneration,     WO  et  seq. 

time  for  regeneration,     110 
Hunger  behavior,     7,  12,  14,  15 
Hunger  divisions,     259 


4o6 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Hypotheses 

of  morphogenesis,     366 

of  reorganization,     96  et  seq. 

Ichthyophthirius,     225,  373 
igneus,     46,  49,  52,  267,  269,  271, 

272,  281,  301,  323,  336 
In  situ  formation  of  membranelles, 

67,  127  et  seq. 
Individuality,     89,  208,  379 
Induced 

division,     82 

reorganization,     116,  135,  149 
resorption  of  primordium,     135, 
137 
Induction 

of  holdfast,     203 

of  mouthparts,     173,  174  e^  seq., 

215 
of    primordium    sites    in    Ble- 
pharisma,     364 
Inhibition 

of  division,  see  division 

of  new  holdfast  by  old,     110 

of  oral  primordium,     119,    144 

et  seq. 
of  regeneration,     13\  et  seq. 
of  regeneration  by  cold,     117 
Injections,     353 
Injury 

causing  primordium  resorption, 

145 
not  inducing  regeneration,     115 

et  seq. 
not      inducing      reorganization, 
99,  100 
Interpenetration  of  striping,     229, 

230 
introversus,     46,  52,  59,  313,  314, 

336,  344 
Island  primordium  formation,   169 

Joining  of  striping,     227 

Kinetodesma,     50 
connectives,     50 


Kinetosomes,  50,  57,  67,  130, 
132,  138,  159,  160,  161,  218, 
365,  367  et  seq.,  376 

"  Kinety,  stomatogenic",    160, 161 

km  bands,     50  et  seq. 

Learning,     20  et  seq.,  24 
Leucophrys,     208 
Light,  in  culturing,     346 
Light  response 

dark  adaptation,     23 

location  of  sensitivity,     23 

racial  variation  in,     22 

in  relation  to  wave  length,     23 
Location    of    macronucleus,     281 
et  seq. 

in  relation  to  stripe  pattern,   284 

variations  in,     282 
Loci  of  stripe  width  contrast,     6, 
179  et  seq. 

absence  of,     189 

competition  between,     190 

exceptions  to  induction  of  pri- 
mordia  by,     191 

explanatory  value  of,     194 

formation  and  obliteration,     190 

in  mincerates,     223 

minor,     188  et  seq. 
loricata,     335 
Loxodes,     286 

M-bands,     53  et  seq. 
Macronuclear  behavior 

control  of,     293  et  seq. 

determined  by  cell  states,     143 
Macronuclear  chain,   regeneration 

of,     102,  290,  291 
Macronuclear  division 

autonomous,     72 

dependent,     74 

in  regeneration,     113 
Macronuclear  extrusions,     310 
Macronuclear  functions 

(see     nucleo-cytoplasmic     inter- 
actions) 

in  differentiation,     297 

lag  effects,     297 


SUBJECT     INDEX 


407 


Macronuclear  increase,     102,  113, 

115 
{see  macronucleus,  growth  of) 
Macronuclear  nodes,  see  nodes  of 

macronucleus 
Macronuclear  segments,  joining  of, 

329 
Macronuclei  of  doublets,     284 
Macronucleus 
{see  nucleus) 
addition  of  nodes,     287 
in  activation  and  inhibition,    143 

et  seq. 
coalescence    of,     91,    113,    114, 

284  et  seq.,  294 

in  relation  to  activation,      294 
dependence  on  cytoplasm,     104 
division  of,     295 
division  in  regeneration,     113 
effects  of  reduction  of,     305 
effect  on  transport,     303 
elongation  of,     73 
forked,     287 
functionally    quiet    in    division, 

303 
fusion  of,     72 
growth  of,     74 

increase  of  nodes  in  division,    74 
location  of,     281 
metabolism  when  reduced,     307 
necessary       for       proportionate 

adjustment  of  parts,     127 
nodal   increase   in    regeneration, 

113 
nodulation  of,     287  et  seq.,  295 
parasitized,     273 
polyploidy  of,     291 
reduction  of,     260,  291 
rejoining  of  sections,     285 
in  relation  to  amorphous  stentors, 

278 
resumption   of  typical   location, 

282,  284 
situs  inversus  of,     284 
structure  and  composition  of,  57 
Maintenance  of  organelles,     289 
in  enucleates,     303 


Masses,  see  fusion  masses 
Medium 

{see  pH) 

culture,     345 

re  effects  of  changes  in  the,     99 
Membranellar  band,     30  et  seq. 

action  of,     232 

autonomy    in    development    of, 
181 

basal  fiber,     33 

base  of,     30 

behavior  of,     249 

contraction  of,     31 

formation  of,     34 

healing  of,     129 

in  situ  formation  of,     67 

inner  lammellae  of,     31  et  seq 

oxidation  in,     247 

polarity  of,     33 

proportional    decrease    in,     75, 
101 

shedding  of,     30,  129,  249,  252 

structure  of,     235 
Metabolism,     259 

affected  by  X-ray,     257 

in  enucleates,     301,  302 

with  reduced  macronucleus,  307 
Metachronal  coordination 

of  body  cilia,     232,  238 

of  membranelles,     232  et  seq. 

passing  around  cuts,     50 
Metazoa,    comparison  with,     372, 

375 
Methyl  cellulose 

effects  of,     100,  349  et  seq.,  352 

solution,     351 
Micronuclear  division 

in  fission,     74 

in  regeneration,     114 

in  reorganization,     103 
Micronuclei,     58 

i^see  micronuclear  division) 

behavior  and  function  of,     280 

no  effect  on  survival,     304 

in  relation  to  division,     82,  87 
Microscope  set-up,     351 
Migration  of  organelles,     211 


4o8 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Milk 

in  culturing,     343 
ingestion  of,     266 
Minced  stentors,     220  et  seq. 

activation  in,     223 
Minceration,  the  operation,     357 
Mitochondria,     45,  58,  302 
Molting,  ciliary,     75 
Morphogenetic  effect  of  chemicals, 

254 
Morphogenetic  gradients,     202  et 

seq. 
Mouthparts,     28 

*' autotomy  ",     98,  209,   210 
direction  of  coiling,     174,   180, 

188 
formation  of,     163 
healing  of,     99,  129 
induction  of,  173,174  et  seq. ,215 
nomenclature,     7 
resorption  in  reorganization  and 

regeneration,     94  et  seq. 
of  reversed  asymmetry,     1 80 
selective    resorption    of,        210, 

213 
size  of,     125 
Movements,     unexplained     proto- 
plasmic,    44 
Mucoid  secretion  stimulated,     242 
muelleri,     333,  337 
multiformis,     46,  59,  63,  123,  281, 

314,  335,  344 
Multiplication  of  stripes,     63,  65, 
66,91,139,163,164,165,169, 
179 
in  division,     68 
Myociliary  complex,     50  et  seq. 
Myonemes,  anaesthesia  of,     241  et 
seq. 

Necrosis,  and  regeneration  failure, 

131 
**  Neurophanes  "  and  **  neuroids  ", 

54  et  seq. 
niger,    46,  47,  49,  267,  281,  313, 

323,  336,  344,  345 


Nodes  of  macronucleus 

effect  of  conditions  on,     293 
equivalence  of,     289 
shape  of,     291 
size  of,     292,  317 
Nodulation  of  macronucleus,     287 
et  seq.,  295 
prevention  of,     288 
in    relation    to    activation    and 
inhibition,     295 
Nomenclature  of  feeding  organelles, 

7 
Nuclear  behavior 

controlled  by  cytoplasm,     376 
in   relation   to   activation,     294, 

296 
in  relation  to  primordium  forma- 
tion,    293  et  seq. 
Nuclear    transplantations,         311, 

359 
Nuclearian,     47 

Nucleo-cytoplasmic      interactions, 
297,  310,  311  etseq.,  371,  374 
et  seq. 
{see  nucleo-cytoplasmic  ratio) 
Nucleo-cytoplasmic     ratio,       206, 
261,  265,  285,  291  etseq.,  304, 
305,  310 
adjustment  of,     113,130 
in  regeneration,     116,  119 
in  relation  to  division,     82 
in  reorganization,     102 
Nucleoli,     310,  323,  329 
Nucleus 

{see  macronucleus,  micronucleus) 
in  activation  and  inhibition,     143 

et  seq. 
degeneration  without  cytoplasm, 

309 
effects  of  excess,     304 
effects  of  reduction,     103,  305, 

307 
{see  reduction  of  macronucleus) 
Nutrient  reserves,     263 
{see  reserves,  nutrient) 

Ophryoglenids,     160 


SUBJECT     INDEX 


409 


Oral     inhibition     of     primordium 
formation,      119,    144   et  seq., 
200 
in  mincerates,     223 
Oral  pouch,     7,  16,  29,  172,  173, 
178,  186 
closure  of,     14 
contraction  of,     31 
Oral  valency 
defined,     206 
in  mincerates,     224 
reduction  of,     208,  213  et  seq. 
Organelles 

(see  maintenance  of  organelles) 
adjustment    of   multiple,       211, 

213 
migration  of;     211 
Osmiophilic  bodies,     57 
Osmotic  eflfects,     239,  244 
Over-pigmented  stentors,     275 
Oxidation  in  membranellar  band, 

247 
Oxidation-reduction  studies,     265 
Oxytrichia,     285 

Paramecium,     19,   20,  22,  40,  41, 
48,  206,  259,  266,  267,  268, 
269,  271,  272,  280,  324,  366, 
368,  375 
Parasites  of  stentors,     273  et  seq. 
Pattern 

cortical,     366,  373,  376 

disarrangements  of,     226  et  seq. 

importance  of,     148,  377  et  seq. 
Pellicle,     6,  42 

regeneration  of,     252 

shedding  of,     250  et  seq. 
Peristome,     7 

(see  membranellar  band) 
Persistence  of  division,     84  et  seq. 
pH 

of  cytoplasm,     246 

effects  of,     246 

of  food  vacuoles,     302 

of  macronucleus,     246 

of  medium,     346 
Phosphatase,  acid,     266 


Phylogeny,  recapitulation  of,     73, 

164,  176,  281 
Pigment 

of  coeruleus,  see  stentorin 

depigmentation      in      chimeras, 
315,  317 

digestion  of,     17,  49 

fading  of,     260 

fluorescent,     48 

of  niger,  see  stentorol 

regeneration  of,     250,  252,  275 

shedding,     249,  250  et  seq. 

types  of,     46 
Pigment  granules,     43,  250 

abnormalities,  of,     274  et  seq. 

attempt  to  remove,     252 

biochemistry  of,     45 

their  displacement,     43,  44 

as  fill-ins,     44,  169 

in  metabolism,     260,  274 

as  mitochondria,     45 

as  nutritive  store,     44,  107 

origin  of,     46 

regeneration  of,     252 

shifts  of  at  fission  line,     76 

transfer  between  grafted  cells,  46 
Pigment  (granular)  stripes,     43 

as  fill-ins,     44,  169 
Pigmentation,  degree  of 

depigmented  stentors,     274 

as  indicating  physiological  state, 
46 

over-pigmented  stentors,     275 
Pinocytosis,     36 
Pipette 

polyethylene,     341 

Spemann,     349 
Plasma  membrane,     43 
Polarity,     195  et  seq. 

(see  also  heteropolarity) 

adaptive    shifts    in    heteropolar 

-    parts,     196 

in  bistomatous  primordia,     175 

cancellation  of,     175 

conflicts,     215,  227 

fixity  of,     195 

in  fragments,     196 


410 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Polarity  (continued) 

of  membranellar  band,     33 
in  mincerates,     221 
and  rate  of  regeneration,     201 
reversal  of,     200 
polymorphus,     48,     56,     120,    234, 

239,  246,  259,  263,  265,  266, 

267,  268,  269,  271,  272,  273, 

274,  275,  278,  281,  287,  313, 

323,  329,  331,  337,  344,  345, 

346 
nocturnal  fission  of,     346 
Postponed  division,     88 
Preparatory  period  in  primordium 

formation,    117,  118,  138,  223 
Primordia 

abnormal,     184  et  seq. 
abnormal,     direction    of    bend, 

187 
joining  of,     178 

of  reversed  asymmetry,  187,199 
supernumerary,     1 80 
synchronization  of,     149  et  seq. 
V-shaped,  loop  or  ring  shaped, 

170,  186,  191 
Primordium 

abnormal  development,     164  et 

seq. 
abortive  development  of,     137, 

139 
arrested  at  stage  4,     132 
completion     without     macronu- 

cleus,     297 
development,      1 59  et  seq. 
deployment,     137,  163,  223 
determination  of,     170 
in  dividers,     70  et  seq. 
induction  of,     193,  194 
lengthening  of,     169,  171 
partial  resorption  of,     153 
re-formation  of,     138,  139 
repair  after  injury,     178 
resorption  of  in  enucleates,     1 44, 

298 
resorption  due  to  injury,     145 
resorption    if   nucleus    reduced, 

307 


rerouting  of,     152  et  seq. 

shedding  of,     173,  253 

stages  in  development,      161 

synthesis  in,     257 
Primordium  site,     160,  179  et  seq. 

dispensibility  of,     161 

obliteration  of,     210 
Proportionality  of  parts 

adjustment  of,     67,  75,  101,  123 
et  seq.,  210 

necessity   of  macronucleus    for, 
127 
Protoplasm 

changes  in  state  of,     245  et  seq. 
Protrichocysts,     44 
Pseudopodia  in  holdfast,     38 
pygmceus,     337 

Quadruplets,     208 

Racial  differences,     320 
Radiophosphorus  uptake,     74,  85, 

266 
Ramifying  zone,     65,  66 
Rate  of  regeneration,     204 
of  holdfast,     110 
in  relation  to  level  of  cut,     247 
in  relation  to  presence  of  hold- 
fast,    202 
Recapitulation  of  phylogeny,     73, 

164,  176,  281 
Recapped  regenerators,     146 
Reconstitution,     220  et  seq. 
of  cell  shape.      111 
of  minced  stentors,     221 
Reduction  of  macronucleus,     291 

305 
Refringent  bodies,      59 
Regeneration,     105 

blockageof  (by  chemicals),      132, 

254,  255 
blockage    of    (inhibition),      107, 

131  et  seq.,  190,  193,  198 
in  conjugants,     324 
of     contractile     structures,     54, 

116 
without  endoplasm,      107 


SUBJECT     INDEX 


411 


Regeneration  {continued) 

in  enucleates,     299 

time  for  holdfast,     110 

inhibition  by  cold,     107 

of     macronuclear     chain,     102, 
290,  291 

micronuclear  division  in,     114 

minimum  size  for,     120  et  seq. 

nutritive  requirements,   107,131 

of  pellicle,     252 

of  pigment,     250,  252 

of  pigment  granules,     252 

without  primordium  formation, 
115 

rate  of,     204 

repeated,     130  et  seq. 

simultaneous  induction  of,     353 

stimulus  to,     115  et  seq. 
Regeneration  rate,  see  rate  of  re- 
generation 
Regeneration  time,    \\1  et  seq. ^222> 

in  aboral  halves,     118 

in  doublets,     119 

effect  of  presence  of  holdfast  on, 
118 

effect  of  size,     118 

effect  of  temperature,     117 

for  holdfast,     110 

related  to  extent  of  ablations,  119 
Renucleation,     359 

delayed,     309 
Reorganization,     9\  et  seq. 

definition  of,     100,154 

essence  of,     103 

explanations  of,     98  et  seq. 

extension  of  oral  resorption  in,  1 56 

hypothesis,     96  et  seq.,  104 

induced,     149 

induction  of,     116,  135 

stimulus  to,     98  et  seq. 
Reorganizers,  identification  of,    93 
Re-regeneration,     130  et  seq. 
Reroutingof  primordium,  152  ei^eg. 
Reserves,  nutrient,     263 

{see    fat    reserves,    carbohydrate 
reserves) 

seasonal  changes  in,     263 


Resorption 

in  anterior  rotated  on  posterior 

half,     229,  230 
induced,   of  primordium,     135, 

137 
of  heteropolar  parts,     198 
of  mouthparts,     94  et  seq. 

prevented  by  LiCl,     256 
of    primordium    in    enucleates, 

144 
of  primordium  through  injury, 

145 
of      primordium      if      nucleus 
reduced,     307 
Respiration,     265 

{see  chemicals,  oxygen) 
rate  in  fragments,     265 
in  relation  to  macronucleus,   265 
Reversal  of  ciliary  beat,     238  et  seq. 
Reversed  asymmetry  of  mouthparts, 

180,  187 
Rhahdomonas  incurva,     274 
Ribbon  bundles,     50  et  seq. 
RNA,     158,  198,  299,  375 
roeseli,     239,   246,   273,   281,   287, 

313,  323,  333,  337,  344 
Rotation 

of  anterior  on  posterior  half,  227 

et  seq. 
of  left  on  right  half,     211 
technique,     353 
rubra,     337 

Selective  resorption  of  mouthparts, 
210,  213 

"  Self-minceration  ",     224,  255 

Seinifolliculina,     1 60 

Sensory  cilia,     25 

Separation  of  grafted  stentors,     88 

Shape  of  stentor,     211 

determined     bv    striping.     111, 
^     221 

in  grafts  of  2  stentors,     112 
multiple  shapes  in  grafts,     210 
reconstitution  of,     111,  315 
recovery  in  enucleates,     299 
unity  favored  by  mincing,     224 


412 


THE    BIOLOGY    OF    STENTOR 


Shedding 

of  cilia,     240 

of    membranellar     band,      129, 
249,  252 

of  pellicle,     250  et  seq. 

of  pigment,     249,  250  et  seq. 

of  primordia,     173,253 
Similarities  in  regeneration,  reor- 
ganization and  division,    147, 
152 
Size 

decrease   in   starvation,     259   et 
seq. 

of   ectoplasmic   units,    constant, 
121 

effect  of  temperature  on,     257 

no  gigantism,     17 

of  mouthparts,     125 

racial  differences,     320 
Species  of  Stentor,     333  et  seq. 
(see  names  of  species) 

tested  by  grafting,     335 
Specific  gravity,     6 
Sphcerophrya  stentoris,     273 
Spiral  growth,     66 
Spirostomum,     42,    50,    118,    120, 

164,  238,  241,  242,  273,  287 
Staining,     52,  348 
Starch 

digestion,     266 

ingestion,     1 1 
Starvation,     12,  259  et  seq. 

in  relation  to  symbiosis,     268 

utilization  of  reserves  in,     262 
Stenostomum,     47,  131 
Stentor  genus  characterized,     333 
Stentorin,     46  et  seq. 

chemical  nature  of,     46,  48 

digestion  of,     47 
Stentorol,     47 
Stentors  as  cells,     370 
Stimulus  to  regeneration,      115 

transmitted,     137,  141 
**  Stomatogenic     kinety  ",  160, 

161 


Stripe  multiplication,  63,  64,  65, 
66,91,139,163,164,165,169, 
179 

in  division,     68 
Stripes,     6 

in  doublets,     64 

interpenetration  of,     229 

joining  of,     227 

number  of,     63 

in  relation  to  division,     63 
Structure,  complexity  of,     59,  60 

in  relation  to  morphogenesis,    60 
Stylonychia,     259,  267,  303 
Surface  precipitation  reaction,  245 
Survival 

of  enucleates,     304 

not  affected  by  micronuclei,    304 

on  slides,     348 
Swimming,      \1  et  seq. 

backward,     19 

of  fragments,     1 9 

spiral,     1 7 
Symbionts 

digestion  of,     267,  269,  272 

exchange  of,     271 
Symbiosis  with  algae,     267  et  seq.y 

315,  335,  336,  337 
Synchronization     of     primordium 

development,     149  et  seq. 
Synchronous  division,     346 

Techniques,     339 
Temperature 

and  feeding  rate,     13 

effects  on  membranellar  beating, 
234 

effect  on  regeneration,    107,  117 

in  relation  to  light  response,     24 

other  effects  of,     244,  248,  257, 
261,  263,  268,  293,  299,  344 
Tetrahymena,     255 
Theoretical  considerations,     374 
Time  (period) 

for  division,     74 

for    regeneration,     117    et    seq., 
223 


SUBJECT     INDEX 


413 


Tissue  cells  compared  with  stentor, 

59 
Tolerance,  acquired 

to  chemicals,     248  et  seq. 

to  stimuh,     21,  248 
Totipotency  of  ectoplasm,      161 
Toxicity  of  stentors,     274 
Transduction,     317 
Transplantations,  nuclear,     359 
Transport  mechanisms,     303 
Triplets 

multiplication  of,     208 

reversion  to  doublets  and  singles, 
208 
Tubes  and  ciliated  vacuoles,     215 
et  seq. 


Unequal  division,     79 

Uptake  of  radiophosphorus,     266 

in  division,  74,  85,  303 
Ur onychia,  116,  119,  280 
UV  radiation,  effects  of,     247 

Vacuolization,     239 
Valency,  see  oral  valency 
Viscosity,     245 
Vitamins,     269 
Vorticella,     53,  241 

Wholeness,     89,  379 
X-rays,  effect  of,     256