Presented to the
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
LIBRARY
by the
ONTARIO LEGISLATIVE
LIBRARY
1980
IN THE
NINETEENTH CENTURY:
ITS PROGRESS AND EXPANSION AT HOME AND ABROAD
COMPRISING A DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY OF THE
BRITISH COLONIES AND DEPENDENCIES.
BY
EDGAR SANDERSON, M.A. (CANTAB.),
AUTHOR OF "HISTORY OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE", "OUTLINES OF THE WORLD'S HISTORY", ETC., ETC.
ILLUSTRATED BY ENGRAVINGS AND MAPS.
sixtieth year of Queen Victoria's reign — now the longest in British
A history — presents a most opportune and happy occasion for laying
before the public a comprehensive work on the British Empire, which has
prospered so signally under her sway.
It is the duty of every patriotic Briton to make himself acquainted with
the history of the Empire. As set forth in this comprehensive Work, it is
a glorious tale of noble deeds and exciting events. There are the French
and Indian wars in CANADA; the conquest of INDIA, the mutiny, and
the Afghan campaigns; the founding of AUSTRALIA and the discovery
of the gold-fields; the Maori wars in NEW ZEALAND; and the struggles
with black men and Boers in AFRICA.
Canada, India, Australia, New Zealand, Africa, — these are the big areas
which are painted with British red on the world's map. But this same
colour is dotted all over the globe; and so the reader will find a full account
of every single colony, possession, and dependency where flies the Union
flag. Such a book, therefore, is invaluable to the scholar, the trader, those
who have kin beyond the sea, the general reader, and even the younger
members of the family.
The mighty expansion of the Empire abroad is profoundly interesting,
but so also is its progress at home. Consequently, this history gives a
complete account of affairs in Parliament during the century, with special
reference to the great reforms which have been achieved, and their results
on the national life. It also presents a very interesting and fair-minded
story of Irish affairs from 1801 to the present time.
During the nineteenth century vast improvements have been accom-
plished in the material, moral, and social condition of Great Britain. This
progress is set forth in chapters upon such subjects as manufactures, ship-
building, engineering; the postal and telegraph systems; sanitary and
temperance reforms; the army and navy; popular sports and amusements;
education, science, literature, and art
This Work does not deal exclusively with the formal facts of history;
many romantic and sensational events from our domestic annals are fully
described. Great conflagrations and shipwrecks; mining, railway, and
other disasters; sensational crimes and notable trials. These and many
more subjects are dealt with in a terse and engaging style which leads the
reader on from chapter to chapter with never-ceasing interest
The author of this Work is specially fitted for his task by scholarship
and experience. EDGAR SANDERSON, M.A. (Cantab.), is the well-known
author of many important historical books, all of which have been emin-
ently successful. In this, his latest work, he has sought to present his
readers with an entertaining narrative, vivid and vigorous in style, and
of the deepest interest from beginning to end.
The value of this Work will be enhanced by a series of about fifty very
fine illustrations, drawn specially for this history by some of the leading
artists of the day. There will also be a set of carefully-prepared maps,
showing the various colonies and dependencies of the British Empire, the
routes of explorers, the ocean -routes to all parts of the world, and the
telegraph lines connecting the Empire. A complete index is also appended
for purposes of easy reference.
THE BRITISH EMPIRE IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY will be
published by subscription, and printed on specially manufactured paper,
super-royal 8vo size. It will be issued in 22 parts, price 2s. each; or
6 volumes, cloth elegant, price gs. each.
BLACKIE & SON, LIMITED;
LONDON, GLASGOW, EDINBURGH, AND DUBLIN.
LI BRAKY,
131897
^3?^-&lgi?
J_-^--^^
THE BRITISH EMPIRE
IN THE
NINETEENTH CENTURY
\V. H. MARGETSON.
SABBATH-DAY WITH THE PILGRIM FATHERS AT THEIR
FIRST SETTLEMENT IN NEW PLYMOUTH.
Vol, j, p, 19$;
SABBATH-DAY WITH THE PILGRIM FATHERS AT THEIR
FIRST SETTLEMENT IN NEW PLYMOUTH.
In August, 1620, the Mayflower sailed from Plymouth with a company
of men, women, and children, who went forth to the New World in search
of religious freedom. They touched land at Cape Cod in November, and
finally, after many disasters and disappointments, settled at a place on the
coast of Massachusetts, which they named New Plymouth. Here they
built a church and fort, and these with the houses were surrounded by a
stockade. The Settlement suffered severely at first, especially from the
rigours of the winter; but these Pilgrim Fathers prospered in time, and
founded the great colony which was known as New England.
THE BRITISH EMPIRE
IN THE
NINETEENTH CENTURY
ITS PROGRESS AND EXPANSION AT HOME AND ABROAD
COMPRISING A DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY OF THE
BRITISH COLONIES AND DEPENDENCIES
BY
EDGAR SANDERSON, M.A. (CANTAB.)
\UTHOR OF "HISTORY OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE", "OUTLINES OF THE WORLD'S HISTORY*
ETC. ETC.
ILLUSTRATED BY ENGRAVINGS AND MAPS
VOLUME I.
r^\ON vtrfftfi
' LIBRARY,
DEC 13139?
\\
BLACKIE & SON, LIMITED
LONDON, GLASGOW, EDINBURGH, AND DUBLIN
J. L. NICHOLS & CO., TORONTO, ONT.
1897.
u
*
CONTENTS
VOL. I.
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS AND MAPS.
Page
SABBATH-DAY WITH THE PILGRIM FATHERS AT THEIR FIRST SETTLEMENT IN
NEW PLYMOUTH, - - Frontis.
ADMIRAL RODNEY DIRECTS THE BATTLE ON BOARD THE FORMIDABLE, - - - 30
THE BRITISH TROOPS FORCE A LANDING AT ABOUKIR BAY IN FACE OF THE FRENCH
BATTERIES, - 36
THE HUMOURS OF STOURBRIDGE FAIR IN THE OLDEN TIMES, 62
THE DESTRUCTION OF THE SPANISH "BATTERING SHIPS" BY THE BRITISH AT GIB-
RALTAR, 138
GOVERNOR PHILLIP ADDRESSING THE FIRST AUSTRALIAN SETTLERS UPON LANDING AT
SYDNEY COVE, - 154
VIEW OF THE TOWN AND FORTRESS OF QUEBEC: A.D. 1759, ----- - 232
GENERAL WOLFE is MORTALLY WOUNDED AS HE LEADS THE CHARGE ON THE PLAINS
OF ABRAHAM, 240
MAP OF THE WORLD, showing all the British Possessions coloured Red, - - I
MAP OF BRITISH COLONIES SOUTH OF CANADA, to 1783, - - - 104
MAP OF CANADA to illustrate the History of 1503-1801, - 204
BOOK I.
GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND BEFORE THE
NINETEENTH CENTURY.
CHAPTER I.— INTRODUCTORY.
Purpose of the work — Peaceful achievements of the nineteenth century — Its distinguished place
in history — Revolution in social life — Changes in the mental and political world — Our vast
Colonial Dependencies and Asiatic Empire, I
CHAPTER II. — SKETCH OF THE GROWTH OF THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION.
The Great Charter— First complete Parliament — The Church of the Middle Ages— The Refor-
mation— Rise of the Puritans — Union of the two crowns — Scotland and Ireland — James I.
and "divine right" — Charles I. — The Restoration — Persecution of Nonconformists —
Habeas Corpus Act — James II. — The Revolution — William and Mary — The Bill of Rights
and Toleration Act — Freedom of the Press — Act of Settlement, 6
vi CONTENTS.
CHAPTER III.— CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY DURING THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.
Page
System of party government — Union of England and Scotland— Accession of the Hanoverian
dynasty— The Septennial Act— Rebellions of 1715 and 1745— Walpole the first "prime
minister "—George III.— Lord North and the "King's friends "—John Wilkes— The
Gordon Riots— Demand for reform of House of Commons — Reform bills introduced by
William Pitt — Freedom of the press vindicated — Independence of juries established, - - 18
CHAPTER IV.— BRITAIN AT WAR IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.
Britain's military position— Duke of Marlborough— Peace of Utrecht— War of the Austrian Suc-
cession— The Seven Years' War — William Pitt, Clive, and Wolfe — Admirals Rodney,
Hood, and Hyde Parker — Peace of Versailles — The French Revolution — The "Young
Corsican"at Toulon — Sir Sidney Smith, Horatio Nelson, and Lord Howe — Arthur Wel-
lesley — Buonaparte's threatened invasion — Victory off Cape St. Vincent — Buonaparte's
expedition to Egypt — Victories of the Nile and Alexandria — Continental combination
against Britain — Battle of Copenhagen — Peace of Amiens — Result of the wars, - - - 27
CHAPTER V. — STATE OF IRELAND DURING THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.
Penal laws against the Roman Catholics — The Irish Parliament — Convention of Dungannon —
" Whiteboys" and " United Irishmen" — Formation of "Orange" lodges — Cruelties prac-
tised on the Roman Catholics — Irish rebellion of 1798 — Act for union with Great Britain
passed, 38
CHAPTER VI.— RELIGIOUS AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.
Prevalence of Deism — Assailants and defenders of the Christian faith — Corruption among the
clergy of the Church of England — Rise of Methodism — Prison reform — Hospitals founded
— Granville Sharp and slavery — Rise of the Evangelical party — William Romaine, John
Newton, and Charles Simeon, 46
CHAPTER VII. — GROWTH OF INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE PREVIOUS TO
THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.
Early industries — The Danes give an impulse to English commerce — Foreign workers settle in
England — Craft- and merchant-guilds organized — Efforts of Edward I. to establish trade —
Edward III. "the father of English commerce" — "Staple towns" established — Importance
of fairs — Ravages of the Black Death — Trading by merchant-adventurers — Early "mercan-
tile system " — Discoveries of new lands — Trinity House established — Commercial policy —
Extinction of trade monopolies — Expansion of trade — Banking system established — Progress
of agriculture — Reclamation of waste lands — Industries and commerce of Scotland, - '57
CHAPTER VIII.— INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE DURING THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.
Restrictions on trade disappearing — Adam Smith's teachings — Government bounties — The first
silk mill in England — Woollen and cotton manufactures — Inventions of John Kay, Har-
greaves, Arkwright, Lees, and Crompton — Cartwright's power-loom — Wedgwood's improve-
ments in pottery — James Watt and the steam-engine — Improvements in bleaching and
calico-printing — Development of the coal and iron trades — Effects on the distribution of the
population — Progress in agriculture — Board of Agriculture and agricultural societies estab-
. lished — Improvements in internal communication — The post-office — Comparative statistics
at close of the century, 72
CONTENTS. vii
BOOK II.
BRITISH COLONIES AND POSSESSIONS BEFORE THE
NINETEENTH CENTURY.
CHAPTER I. — CHARACTER AND METHODS OF COLONIZATION— EARLY NAVIGATORS.
Page
Our Colonies in general — Modern sense of the term "colony" — Methods of colonization —
Maritime enterprise in fifteenth century — Discoveries of Columbus, Vespucci, and the Cabots
— Spanish colonization in America — The aboriginal tribes, 94
CHAPTER II.— THE NORTH AMERICAN COLONIES TILL THEIR SEPARATION
FROM BRITAIN.
Britain begins her colonial dominion — Sir Walter Raleigh — Colonization of Virginia — The
slave-trade introduced — The ' ' Pilgrim Fathers " — End of Dutch sway — The Thirteen
Colonies — Progress of the colonies — The quarrel with Great Britain — Attempt to impose
taxes — Faneuil Hall and Boston Harbour — Beginning of the Revolutionary War — General
Washington — Surrender of General Burgoyne at Saratoga — Surrender of Lord Cornwallis
— Paul Jones and the privateers — Independence acknowledged — Constitution of the United
States — The first president and first ambassador — Progress of the cotton cultivation, - - 103
CHAPTER III. — COLONIAL POSSESSIONS IN EUROPE AND AFRICA.
Early history of Gibraltar — Its acquisition by Britain — Attempts by Spain to recover possession
— Gallant and successful defence by General Eliott— Gambia and the Gold Coast —
African trading companies — St. Helena — Sierra Leone, - - 133
CHAPTER IV.— AUSTRALASIA— NEW SOUTH WALES.
Peculiar conditions of early Australian colonization — First authentic notices of Australia or New
Holland — Dampier surveys part of the coast — Captain Cook the first real discoverer of the
continent — The British flag hoisted in New South Wales — Transportation of convicts to
Botany Bay — Captain Phillip appointed governor — A visit from the French — Norfolk
Island occupied — Hardships of the first settlers, and difficulties with the convicts — Free
emigrants begin to arrive — Major Grose succeeds Captain Phillip — A demoralizing truck-
system introduced — Growing prosperity of the colony — Early attempts to explore the
continent — Important surveys of the coasts by Bass and Flinders — Flinders detained at
Mauritius by the French governor — His return to England, and death, - - - - 142
CHAPTER V.— CANADA— EARLY HISTORY (1534-1713).
First efforts by the French to colonize Canada — Jacques Cartier — De la Roche's attempt to
form a settlement — Pontgrave and Chauvin — Champlain, the founder of French Canada —
Colony of Acadie — Beginning of Quebec — The Algonquins, Iroquois, and other Indian
tribes — Arrival of the Jesuits — Richelieu's policy towards Canada — Quebec surrendered to
the English, and basely restored by Charles I. — Able rule of Governor Champlain — Indian
outrages — Colbert's able administration — Marquis de Tracy and Governor de Courcelles —
Encouragements for emigration from France — Ravages of disease and drunkenness among
the Indians — Governor de Frontenac — La Salle's expedition to the west — Massacre of
Lachine — French attacks on English territory — English expeditions against Montreal and
Quebec — Failure of English attempts for the conquest of Canada, 167
CHAPTER VI.— CANADA— TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN (1713-1763).
Condition of Canada under De Vaudreuil and De Beauharnois — Beginning of the great conflict
— The Ohio Company and Mr. George Washington — General Braddock's expedition
against Fort Duquesne — Able services of Sir William Johnson — Capture of Oswego by
Vlii CONTENTS.
Page
the French — Futile British expedition against Quebec — Fort William Henry surrenders
to the French — Massacre by the Indians — Pitt's resolution to expel the French from
Canada — Early career of General Wolfe — Failure of British attack on Ticonderoga— Siege
and final surrender of Quebec — Wolfe and Montcalm mortally wounded — Effort of the
French to recover Quebec — Montreal surrenders to the British — Canada ceded to Britain
by the Treaty of Paris, - - 203
CHAPTER VII.— CANADA UNDER BRITISH RULE (1763-1801).
War with the Indians — Pontiac the Ottawa chief— Major Gladwin's gallant defence of Fort
Detroit — British forts captured — Colonel Bouquet's expedition — Sir William Johnson's
negotiations with the Indians — Submission of Pontiac and the tribes — The French
Canadians under the new rule — General Murray becomes governor — Able administration
of his successor — Quebec Act of 1774 — Surrender of St. John's — Quebec besieged by the
Americans — Loyalty of the Canadians — Province of Ontario created and colonized —
Constitutional Act of 1791 — Upper and Lower Canada formed — Characteristics of the
French Canadian, ... 246
CHAPTER VIII.— NEWFOUNDLAND— NOVA SCOTIA— NEW BRUNSWICK-
PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND.
Discovery of Newfoundland — Customs regulating the fisheries — The English flag planted on
its coast — Importance of the cod-fishery — Attempts to colonize by the English — Lord
Baltimore's colony — Wise rule of Sir David Kirke — Newfoundland finally ceded to Britain
— St. John's seized by the French, but recaptured — After-history of the island — Nova
Scotia or Acadia — A Scottish settlement at Port Royal — The country restored to France
— Cromwell's expedition to Port Royal — Joint occupation by English and French — Acadia
ceded to France — Contests between the English and French settlers — Sir William Phipps'
expedition against Port Royal — The colony becomes a British possession — Difficulties with
the French inhabitants — Governorship of Paul Mascarene — Arrival of English emigrants —
Difficulties with the Acadians — Their expatriation — Representative government established
— The colonies of New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island, ... - 274
CHAPTER IX.— HUDSON'S BAY AND THE GREAT NORTH-WEST.
Early history of Hudson's Bay territory — The Hudson's Bay Company — Rupert's Land-
Troubles with the French traders — Assigned to Britain at the Peace of Versailles — Explo-
ration of the Great North-western regions — The Verendryes — Their important discoveries
— Sir Alexander Mackenzie crosses the Rocky Mountains, - 302
CHAPTER X.— COLONIAL POSSESSIONS IN THE WEST INDIES.
Geographical division and history — Barbados — Introduction of negro labour into the island —
Enterprising spirit of the Barbadians — The Bermudas or Somers' Islands — Leeward Islands
— St. Kitts — Nevis — Antigua — Montserrat — Dominica — Virgin Islands — Windward Islands
— Tobago — St. Lucia — Grenada-and the Grenadines — St. Vincent — The Bahamas — British
Honduras or Belize — Trinidad — Jamaica, . - 310
LIBRARY
°EC 1 8 1897
W M8£Z.
* =.
Is OREEJNLAN K^f Kny,. *•*•"*••'»•«
' ',' "*VN
S-kVt --?*$
« C^ -
KrUraf- \^ Vll-Htl^f i ^**-'i; s^ ' 'V> '''
I r-o-T% % v- •*.. X .f.,u».i>- -« .;\- •--
f Ifustfoa ^i ^
•"*"! ' ^T.; "r~^t
•*j^\ -^^^H:
-• -
-,;-,
•a o r^i —-
•PPT. \ t.^f/ia * /--(- •
'*^..^!«v5. E
"~" l^f 4&J'j' '^&£^pi'W&''Wt
""•- TwJlVuitf «^?>-jftE S . y'j
^^•^•'',;:!u"S !%£ •••£"? ™//:
.--::::;'":i^€M£'
OUR EMPIRE
AT HOME AND ABROAD.
BOOK I.
GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND BEFORE THE
NINETEENTH CENTURY.
CHAPTER I.— INTRODUCTORY.
Purpose of the work— Peaceful achievements of the nineteenth century— Its distinguished
place in history — Revolution in social life — Changes in the mental and political
world — Our vast Colonial Dependencies and Asiatic Empire.
THE purpose of this work is to depict the progress and condition
of the British Empire in the nineteenth century, and to furnish
a complete historical and descriptive account of our Colonial
Possessions and Dependencies in every quarter of the globe, from
the time of British occupation, or, in some cases, from an earlier
period, till the present day. In pursuing this object, we hope to
see little of party conflicts or of political intrigues. The din of
parliamentary debates will concern us only so far as, from amid
the tumult of the strife, great legislative measures have emerged,
conceived in wisdom, wrought with skill, and rich in blessings
for generations yet unborn. Those statesmen and warriors alone
will appear upon the scene whose names are renowned for
eminent services of lasting value, rendered by them to the coun-
try of their birth. A history of peaceful progress in the civilized
arts, a record of physical, moral, and intellectual improvement,
will render homage to men distinguished rather by attainments
in learning and in culture, by inventive skill, by patient investi-
gation, and by brilliant discovery in the realm of science, by daring
and endurance in travel and exploration, than by victories won in
warfare waged against human foes.
VOL. I.
2 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
The place reserved in history for the peaceful achievements
of the nineteenth century is, beyond doubt, one of the first order
of distinction. No equal period of the world's history has wit-
nessed economical changes of such a kind and degree, so wonderful
in themselves, so abiding and far-reaching in their influence and
effects. Science has lengthened human life, has vastly abridged
distance, and, for the transmission of news, has annihilated time.
Nature, at many points, has been, according to the divine ordin-
ance, conquered by man. The earth has been at last subdued,
and vast regions once void are fast being replenished. The abun-
dance of the means of life, combined with the natural fertility of
the stock, has more than tripled, since 1801, the population of
Great Britain. Apart from Canada and India, the British nation
has acquired, during this century, settlements beyond the seas now
peopled by some millions of our race. The wealth of the whole
people, through manufactures and trade, along with the operation
of fiscal reforms, has vastly increased; and, in spite of the evils due
to keen competition, the necessaries, the comforts, and even some
of the luxuries of life are far more widely distributed than ever
before among the class who exist by manual toil.
The improvements effected in what was old, the discovery and
development of new forces, have wrought a revolution in social
life without example in the history of the world. Men not yet
conscious of old age have beheld a transition, in the means of
locomotion alone, from almost barbarous times to an era of high
civilization. The traveller by train thinks with horror of the days
of movement by coach, not at the call of enjoyment under sunny
skies, but on compulsion of affairs demanding long, dreary, and
shelterless passage beneath driving rain or snow, over perilous and
miry roads. The facts all around us, in this marvellous age, tran-
scend the conceptions of fiction and romance. The moving palace
of the great steamship lines, the production and contents of the
daily gazette, are triumphs of human skill and organization at
which, on a sudden revelation, the people of the last century would
stand aghast. Man's knowledge of nature's secrets and resources
has so increased in extension and in depth, that a new world of
acquirement has come into our possession more than equal, for
practical effect on human life, to all that was known before the
beginning of the period with which we propose to deal.
INTRODUCTORY. 3
Not less striking have been the changes of the nineteenth
century in the mental and political world. A new British demo-
cracy exists along with new methods, standards, and beliefs in
literature, philosophy, education, and art. Every department of
intellectual research and social order is rife with the restless activity
and energy of this unparalleled age. Countless societies exist,
composed of men devoted, in the labour of a life, or as the cherished
pursuit of hours of leisure, to the artistic and literary records of
past ages, to scientific discovery, to the enforcement of sound
principles in practical and social science, and to the cultivation of
art in every kind. Year by year vast stores are thus added to the
accumulated treasure inherited from past ages. The endless ener-
getic work of men and women who are true lovers of their kind
is seen in numberless associations founded and supported for the
relief of human suffering and the redress of wrong. Change is not
always improvement and progress towards higher things, but this,
at least, is certain, that during the nineteenth century, among the
British race, human pain has been diminished, human happiness
and comfort have greatly grown, human sympathies have" been
enlarged, human eyes have brightened with a better hope for the
future of the world.
Nor is it merely energetic effort and kindly impulse that are
ceaselessly at war with evils new and old. Scientific method and
skilful organization are among the great marks of the present age,
and, in the face of social problems to be solved, and public diffi-
culties to be encountered, they afford a reasonable expectation,
as we look to what has been surmounted and achieved during
the nineteenth century, that real and permanent improvement will
not fail to be attained.
When we turn from the narrow limits of the British Isles to
our expansion abroad, and contemplate the vast colonial realm, the
Greater Britain beyond Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific seas, we are
confronted by a spectacle of interest and importance unequalled,
unapproached in the whole course of political history. The
Roman Empire in olden time embraced nearly the whole civilized
world; but the world, as then fully known, comprised less than
half the area of Europe, a fringe of northern Africa, and a part
of south-western Asia. The Russian Empire in modern days is
equal in area to the British possessions, but is only in a slight
4 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
degree a colonial dominion. Two hundred years ago John Milton,
great alike as poet and publicist, pictured, in prophetic mood,
England as standing " with all her daughter-lands about her", but
his imagination, vivid as it was, could not prefigure a New Zea-
land, an Australia, a great South African dominion, or such a
territory as the larger Canada. Still less could he forecast those
unique events in all colonial history — the loss to England of one
great dependency in North America, just preceded by the acquire-
ment of new lands on the same great continent, and followed, in
due time, by expansion of that conquest into a colonized area
extending from the Atlantic to the Pacific shore. Last to take
the field for the prize of colonial possession, Great Britain has long
ago and far away outstripped all her rivals; and mainly through
her children is the civilization of Europe at this moment being
spread throughout the world. Our language, our literature, our
institutions, our political freedom have been transplanted to
regions nigh upon the Arctic circle, and beneath the Southern
Cross, and new cities are ever growing, new communities arising,
new fields and gardens being reclaimed from wilderness, in a
colonial realm about sixty times as large as the motherland. The
mistaken policy which alienated one great British community, and
so created the United States of North America, has been long
exchanged for a treatment which enables our distant fellow-
subjects to speak with real affection of Great Britain as " Home".
From these great new lands many a young colonist comes to
study in the ancient, stately, and picturesque abodes of English,
Scottish, and Irish learning, and to display his athletic vigour in
the field and on the golf-links, on the tennis-ground and the
stream. Now and again an old or middle-aged Canadian or
Australian magnate arrives on our shores to seek reception within
the walls of the imperial Parliament, or to purchase an estate, to
found a new family in Great Britain, and to lay his bones in the
land which bred himself or his sire. Closely connected by blood,
language, and traditions, and by the interests of trade in which
our settlers furnish food and raw material for textile fabrics in
profitable barter for the productions of the British loom and forge,
the British race at home and abroad, save in the United States,
forms one great democracy of nearly fifty million souls, subjects
of the same benignant rule.
INTRODUCTORY. 5
Our great Asiatic dependency, the Indian Empire, presents
a strong contrast to the other colonial dominions. There alone
we have the spectacle of two hundred thousand Britons, civilians ^
and armed men, controlling more than two hundred millions of
men of foreign races, religions, and tongues. The most remark-
able fact about the acquirement of this dominion is its accidental, »
unforeseen development. About three hundred years ago, in the
last days of Queen Elizabeth, a trading company is formed for
traffic in the Eastern lands and seas. Two centuries and a half
elapse, and that Company, which has long represented really the
might and majesty of Great Britain and her rulers, has become
virtual mistress of the whole vast Indian peninsula, as well as of
a large territory to the east of the Bay of Bengal. The manner
of this phenomenal achievement will be told hereafter; the fact
is one of the marvels of history. The nation derives no direct
benefit of tribute or profit from this possession save that which
accrues from the operations of trade. No revenue is raised by
taxation beyond that which is absolutely needed to cover the
expense of administration. The subjects of the Queen in India
are in no wise treated as the victims of conquest, but are now
as free from plunder or oppression at our hands as the dwellers
in any of the British colonies mainly composed of British emi-
grants and their children. Through her presence in India Britain
has become a great Oriental power, and contiguity with the
Asiatic possessions of Russia creates for our Cabinets a new foreign
policy demanding anxious and vigilant care. As the nature of
our acquisition of this Eastern sphere of rule is without example,
so is the future, the end of this great enterprise, beyond all
calculation.
From this preliminary sketch of the task which lies before us,
we may now pass to some account of the British Empire in times
prior to the nineteenth cenfury, and trace, mainly during the
eighteenth century, the steps by which the nation arrived at the
position which she occupied in the year 1801.
6 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
CHAPTER II.
SKETCH OF THE GROWTH OF THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION.
The Great Charter— First complete Parliament— England under the Tudors— The Church
of the Middle Ages — The Reformation — Church of England— Rise of the Puritans
— Union of the two crowns — Scotland and Ireland — James I. and "divine right "-
Charles I.— The Restoration — Persecution of Nonconformists— Habeas Corpus Act
— James II. — The Revolution — William and Mary — The Bill of Rights and Tolera-
tion Act — Freedom of the Press — Act of Settlement.
Celts or Britons; Romans; conquering Teutonic tribes; Scandi-
navian warriors, first as mere invaders and plunderers, then as
dwellers settling down among, and absorbed by the English
race; Norman subjugation and feudal rule; these are the phases
which, in the changes and conflicts of nearly twelve hundred
years, indicate the slow formation, and bring us to the political
birth, of the English nation. The Great Charter, wrung from
King John by the armed Norman barons, proclaimed that Eng-
land was destined to be and to live politically free. In the
days of the tyrant's grandson, one of our greatest monarchs,
Edward the First, the distinction between Normans and English
almost vanished, and the great first complete Parliament, that of
1295, furnished the outline of our modern constitution. This
assembly, which first sat in two houses under Edward the Third,
contained both lay and spiritual barons, along with elected re-
presentatives of counties, cities, and boroughs. Here, in the
thirteenth century, we find the source of our freedom, our pros-
perity, and our national fame. The rise of a House of Commons,
destined to be the model for representative assemblies in all free
nations, was coeval with the creation of the earliest colleges at
our two great ancient seats of learning; with the formation of a
noble language, and with the dawn of a splendid literature, "the
brightest, the purest, the most durable of all the glories of our
country; a literature rich in precious truth and precious fiction;
a literature which boasts of the prince of all poets and of the
prince of all philosophers; a literature which has exercised an
influence wider than that of our commerce, and mightier than
that of our arms". The new nation soon gave assurance of the
prowess of her sons on the field of battle. In the Hundred Years'
GROWTH OF THE CONSTITUTION. 7
War, though she happily failed in all attempts at the conquest
of France, the knights and yeomen who went forth from her
shores proved themselves to be truly formidable foes. In the
fourteenth, and early in the fifteenth centuries, English skill in
the arts of peace was displayed in the erection of the noble
cathedrals which modern architects regard with envy and
despair.
Thus did the English people assert a claim to a foremost place
among the nations of the last age of the mediaeval world. During
the same period the House of Commons was growing in strength,
sometimes in alliance with the king against the barons, sometimes
in concert with the lords against the king. Before the close of
Plantagenet times, not only was the monarchy of England so far
limited that the king, without parliament, could make no law, raise
no money by taxation, and rule only by the laws of the land,
with advisers and agents responsible to parliament through the
power of impeachment; but the Commons, for themselves, had
gained the right to share in all legislation, to originate money
grants, to exercise freedom of speech in debate, to enjoy freedom
from arrest, and to determine disputed elections to their House.
Feudalism was almost at an end; all men born on English soil
had become freemen, and could all, below the peerage, claim and
maintain, under the common law, equal civil rights in the courts
of justice. The internecine strife among the nobles, known as
the Wars of the Roses, caused the collapse, for a time, of this
constitutional liberty. The old nobles almost vanished through
mutual extermination on the field of battle and by bills of attain-
der. A statute of Henry the Sixth, in 1430, restricted voting for
knights of the shire, or county members of the House of Commons,
to freeholders of property " to the value of forty shillings by the
year", a sum then equal to many pounds of our day.
The strength of both Lords and Commons was seriously cur-
tailed in Tudor times, under what has been called the "New" or
"Popular" Monarchy, this latter expression meaning a royal power
dependent on popular will, and controlled by the risk of insurrec-
tion, against which the sovereign, happily for English freedom,
could bring no standing army to operate. As regards the House
of Commons, the borough franchise, as well as the county voting,
was greatly restricted by confinement to a class of privileged
8 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
burgesses, and the assembly was largely subject to royal and oli-
garchical influence. The Tudor sovereigns, indeed, used Parliament,
in the main, only for their own ends. During the last twelve years
of Henry the Seventh, only one Parliament was held. Henry the
Eighth summoned no Parliament from 1515 to 1522, and none
again from 1523 to 1530. Royal proclamations acquired the force
of law, and the Privy Council, aided by such institutions as the
Star Chamber, superseded, to a large extent, the work of juries,
and saved servile officials from the punishment of their misdeeds.
Money was raised from the wealthy by "benevolences" or enforced
presents, and from the trading class by forced loans which were
not repaid; by judicial fines, and by the plunder of the Church.
Yet the spirit and strength of English subjects prevented the
Tudor dictatorship from passing into the despotism which befell
other European nations — France, and- Germany, and Spain. In-
dividuals might and did suffer, but the masses were ever ready to
resist gross and general oppression. The people kept in their
hands the power of the purse. When Henry the Eighth, without
the consent of Parliament, required of his subjects a contribution
amounting to one-sixth of their goods, a general outcry, with the
appearance of thousands of men in arms, compelled him not
only to withdraw his demands, but to make a public and solemn
apology for his infraction of English laws. In 1523, the House of
Commons, with great Sir Thomas More as Speaker, resisted the
imperious Wolsey at the height of his power, and voted only half
of the money asked by the crown. Such a people could not be
enslaved, and, by taking their stand firmly on their constitutional
right to give or withhold money, they prevented the sovereign from
hiring professional soldiers in numbers sufficient to enforce his
will, and our forefathers thus escaped the fate of the countries
where parliamentary institutions soon ceased to exist. The insular
position of England, guarding her from foreign invasion, dispensed
with the need of regular troops until the time came when Parlia-
ment had provided ample securities against their misuse for the
ends of tyranny.
In Tudor times we have the religious revolution which was so
greatly to affect the future of the British Isles. The Church of
the Middle Ages, invested with great power and wealth, had
been a state within a state, and some of the most dramatic and
GROWTH OF THE CONSTITUTION. 9
stirring scenes of our history had arisen from the conflict be-
tween the ecclesiastical and the lay authority. In feudal times
she had rendered eminent services to the cause of human happi-
ness and progress. In the library the Church had preserved,
and in the writing-room of the monastery her devotees had copied
and multiplied, the classic treasures of the past. Her chronicles
had handed down to posterity the record of events. Of her
wealth the hungry had been fed, the college and the school estab-
lished and endowed. By the skill which, in earlier days, was the
almost exclusive possession of monk and priest, the sick had been
healed, and the arts of peace had been practised and advanced, in
the reclamation of wastes, the tillage of the soil, and the erection
and adornment of magnificent architectural shrines and abodes.
By the pleading of her priests the feudal master had often been
persuaded to free the slave, and to lighten the burdens of the
vassals bound to him by feudal law. The persecuted and the
weak had been sheltered in her sanctuaries, and, in the person of
Stephen Langton and the like, she had lifted up the bold voice of
men who, fearing God, feared none besides, against the wrong-
doer and oppressor, the mail-clad baron and the supreme feudal
lord, the crowned and anointed king. The ranks of English
statesmen and diplomatists, prior to the Reformation, were often
recruited from the clerical order. From Dunstan to Wolsey,
churchmen were seen directing the greatest affairs with a skill and
knowledge rarely found among laymen.
During the fifteenth century this great institution largely de-
clined in character and power. The movement led by Wyclif had
been, indeed, suppressed, for the fulness of time had not yet come.
The days of the Renascence, or Revival of Learning, when the
printing-press spread fast and far the thoughts of mutineers against
the domination of the Church, found the clergy no longer the sole
or the chief proprietors of knowledge. Men were asking for reasons,
and inquiring into dogmas, rather than yielding implicit belief, and
Henry the Eighth, without any defect of orthodoxy in himself,
took advantage of the times for his private ends. The Houses
were summoned to do his work. A ready compliance passed the
needful statutes, and the king, with his Protestant adviser, Thomas
Cromwell, as chief agent, effected the separation of the English
Church from the see of Rome. The Church was stripped of her
IO OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
wealth, and received a new earthly head in the person of the
sovereign. The creed and ritual of the Reformed Church were
almost settled, by Cranmer and others, in the reign of Henry's son,
and, after the short-lived reaction under Mary Tudor, the Church
was finally established by Elizabeth in the form of a "mean between
two extremes", a compromise which has ever since enabled
Anglican churchmen to hold widely divergent views on many im-
portant points. Midway between Geneva and Rome, she embraces
at once those who differ little in doctrine from Calvin and Knox,
and those who, in many points, are in sympathy and harmony with
the feelings and principles of devoted adherents of the Roman see.
The royal supremacy involved in the very existence of the English
Church has had important political effects in binding her ministers
and laymen to the throne by the ties at once of hope, gratitude,
and fear. Her tastes and traditions are all monarchical.
On the other hand, those who, from the first, dissented from the
Church on the question of prelacy, and especially those who strictly
followed the theology of Calvin, formed the party known, under
Elizabeth, as Puritans. The persecution which they endured from
the great Tudor queen made the party hostile to the royal pre-
rogative, and the mercantile classes in the towns, with a large
section of the smaller landed gentry, became powerful upholders of
popular rights and popular claims in the early Stuart days. In
Scotland, especially, the democratic nature of the established
Presbyterian church government, and in Wales the strong Calvin-
istic theology adopted by the numerous Nonconformists, composing
the main body of the people, had great influence on political feeling
and opinion, and largely contributed to form the Liberal and
Radical sentiments and views by which those countries are dis-
tinguished in these latest days of the nineteenth century.
The union of the territory under one king created a Great
Britain. That illustrious monarch, Edward the First, had made
Wales subject to English rule, though the Principality was not
represented in Parliament till the days of Henry the Eighth.
Edward and his degenerate son had vainly striven to gain a
permanent hold on Scotland, and the northern country, em-
bracing the French alliance, was in a state of hostility, active or
quiescent, towards her neighbour, for nearly three centuries.
The union of the crowns in the person of James the First of
GROWTH OF THE CONSTITUTION. II
England and Sixth of Scotland would have been productive of
immediate benefit to both countries, if the Stuart sovereigns of the
male line had been wise and benignant rulers. The first Stuart
king of England, indeed, was the first ruler of the whole British
Isles. Ireland, invaded and partially subdued under Henry the
Second, had fought, with fitful fierceness, for the expulsion of the
hated "Saxon", but had been thoroughly conquered by Mountjoy in
the last years of Elizabeth. The last O'Donnel and O'Neil who
held the rank of independent princes or chiefs did homage to James
at his palace of Whitehall, and thenceforward the British monarch's
writs ran, and his judges held assize, in every part of Ireland. In
1590, on James' marriage with the Danish princess Anne, Den-
mark had formally resigned all claims to the sovereignty of the
Orkney Isles, and that mixed Scandinavian and Scottish population
came finally under British rule. Scotland, giving instead of
receiving a king, retained her own laws and constitution, with
tribunals and parliaments independent of those which sat at West-
minster. The administration of the country was in Scottish hands,
but her connection with a wealthier and stronger nation caused
her, though in name an independent kingdom, to receive, for more
than a century, much of the treatment of a subject province. As
for Ireland, she was openly ruled as a dependency won by the
sword. The English settlers, wholly relying on the mother
country for safety and existence, were subject to her dictation,
and, for their own parts, they oppressed the people among whom
they had fixed their abodes. The Irish, alone among the nations
of northern Europe, had remained faithful to the old religion, and
sectarian animosity was thus added to the hatred inspired by the
alien conquering race. The cruelties perpetrated by English
invaders and persecutors in the later Tudor times made the Celtic
population of Ireland regard the executive administration, wholly
in English hands, as the hated rule of foreigners and foes, ab-
horrent to the ruled in character, nationality, and religious faith.
Such were the conditions under which all the British Isles, in
1603, were found peaceably united as the realms of the same king.
For nearly a century, under Stuart rule, England saw herself
deposed from her high place among the nations of Europe, save
during a brief interregnum, in which the genius of Cromwell,
backed by a formidable army and fleet, asserted her claims with
12 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
great vigour and success. The nation, for a long period, was
involved in momentous struggles concerning the rights of parlia-
ments and kings. James the First brought with him from
Scotland the theory of divine right. Scottish kings had for
centuries been subject to being thwarted by turbulent mediaeval
barons, and James the Sixth found all the charms of novelty in the
theories of absolute power as the right of monarchs, which were so
much opposed to his experience and practice of rule in his Scottish
realm. The new system, contrary to all the implied teaching of
both the Old and the New Testaments, held that the Supreme
Being had ordained, as the right method of rule over nations,
hereditary monarchy, with succession in due order of primogeni-
ture; with despotic authority residing in the sovereign; with all
limits on the prerogative liable to be removed by him, who alone
could impose them as concessions of his free will and pleasure.
No treaty concluded by a king with his people could be held bind-
ing on him, as it merely declared his present intentions, and those
intentions were subject to change. It is needless to point out, that
this patriarchal theory of government was wholly alien from pre-
vious practice in England. Many kings had reigned in defiance
of the strict rule of descent. The Tudors had paid little heed to
the "divine" institution, and Henry the Eighth had obtained an act
of parliament empowering him to leave the crown by will. Eliza-
beth induced Parliament to pass a law, making it treason to deny
the reigning sovereign's competency, with the assent of Parliament,
to alter the succession. The "divine right of kings", as a matter
known to Englishmen, is completely disposed of by these and other
facts. During the hundred and sixty years which preceded the
union of the Red and White Roses, in the marriage of Henry of
Lancaster to Elizabeth of York, nine kings reigned in England,
and of these nine kings, six were deposed, and five lost their lives
as well as their crowns, either by secret murder or in civil war.
James the First had an obvious interest, however, in asserting that
birth confers rights anterior to law, and unalterable by law, for he
was excluded from the throne of England by the will of Henry the
Eighth, but was the undoubted heir by descent from both William
the Conqueror and Egbert. The new king's strong adherence to
episcopal government in the Church won many supporters, amongst
the English clergy, of the new theory of kingly rule, and divine right
GROWTH OF THE CONSTITUTION. 13
was soon preached from pulpits of the Established Church. The
claims of the monarch assumed this extreme form just when a
republican spirit had begun to be prominent in Parliament and in
the country. At the very close of Elizabeth's reign, a strong
parliamentary and popular attack had been made upon the odious
monopolies, and the haughty and despotic, but judicious, Tudor
queen had felt compelled to recede, as she did, in the right way
and at the right time, before a display of public spirit, in favour of
public liberties, which seemed to threaten armed revolt. The
lesson was wholly lost upon her successors. James the First did
all that monarch could to irritate, alarm, and insult a parliament
which he could not venture to attempt to coerce or suppress. He
imprisoned some patriotic members. He tore out of the journals
of the Commons, with his own hand, the page containing the
famous Protestation, which declared the "liberties, franchises, privi-
leges, and jurisdictions of parliament" to be "the ancient and un-
doubted birthright and inheritance of the subjects of England".
Those outrages only caused the undaunted spirit of the English-
men of those days to swell higher and higher against arbitrary rule.
At the same time, the schism between the Church and the Non-
conformists was ever growing wider. Both parties went into
extremes. The Anglican clergy in many quarters favoured "divine
right", and drew nearer to the old religion in ritual and doctrine.
The Puritans, irritated by persecution, adopted the stern spirit of
the Old Testament rather than the benignity of the New. They
made the Lord's Day into a strict Jewish Sabbath; they gave to
their children the names of Hebrew warriors and patriarchs; they
dwelt much on Old Testament examples of cruel vengeance
wrought on foes; they denounced popular pastimes and innocent
amusements as sins, and often made religion displeasing to the
young and the light-hearted by their sanctimonious precision,
their Pharisaical cant, their sour solemnity of face, and the nasal
twang with which, in and out of season, they degraded the imagery
and style of Scripture by application to the most trivial matters of
daily life. With all this, their sound morality in matters of real
importance, their high standard of right and wrong, their reckless
disregard of man's approval in matters of conscience, created an
influence which has never ceased to act for good on the social life
of their country. To the Puritans, above all, the British people
14 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
are indebted for the inestimable treasure of constitutional free-
dom.
James the First died, and left the throne to a son trained in
his own school of royal prerogative. The son bettered the lessons
received from the sire. Aided by Laud and Wentworth in church
and state, Charles the First strove for, and for some years exer-
cised, despotic rule. His Scottish subjects were alienated by gross
interference with their religious system. The patience of a large
section of the English people was worn out at last. When the
monarch, attended by an armed guard of court bravoes, went to
the House of Commons intent to seize, within the walls sacred to
free debate, the persons of patriotic members, the inevitable end
came in civil war. The king expiated his tyranny and his bad
faith on the stricken fields of Marston Moor and Naseby, and
ended his career, by the cruel, lawless, and impolitic act of a small
but fanatical and powerful armed party of his people, on the
scaffold at Whitehall.
This terrible lesson was not lost upon his son and successor at
the " Restoration", which succeeded vain attempts to create a new
constitution. There was no more thought of kingship by divine
right. A parliament must and did exist along with the restored
monarchy, and a very corrupt parliament it was. Bribery by bare
gold, and royal influence in various forms, tampered with debates
and votes; but even this House of Commons again and again
checked the royal will, and Charles the Second, with all his moral
worthlessness, was far too clever and cautious to provoke a new
civil war, and " be sent again on his travels", as in the early days of
his legal reign. He " managed ", like a dexterous politician as he
was, quite of the modern school, his ministers, his Parliament, and
his people, and died regretted at any rate by the people of his
capital, leaving a signal example to persons in high places of the
value of polite and charming manners. In religious affairs under
Charles, the Episcopal Church had been restored, but with a modi-
fied spirit which claimed no divine sanction for Episcopacy, while it
inculcated devotion to monarchical power. Under the persecution
of the " Clarendon Code "• —the new Act of Uniformity, the Cor-
poration Act, the Conventicle Act, the Five Mile Act — Non-
conformists or Dissenters were prohibited, under severe penalties,
from worshipping according to their own beliefs; they were excluded
GROWTH OF THE CONSTITUTION. 1 5
from municipal office, and from the service of the state ; and
in many cases their ministers were debarred from earning their
bread by teaching, when ejection from their benefices, as men not
ordained by bishops, had deprived them of their livelihood in the
service of the Church. In foreign affairs, Britain had sunk to the
lowest point. The king was the pensioner of the French mon-
arch, and had engaged in schemes for the establishment, by the
aid of French troops, of arbitrary rule and the Roman Catholic
faith.
In the latter part of Charles the Second's reign, the party names
of Tory and Whig, corresponding to the modern Conservative and
Liberal, had been assumed by the parties who respectively favoured
the royal prerogative (not, of course, any longer meaning mere
arbitrary rule), and the cause of progress towards complete civil and
religious freedom.
Under Charles the Second two important things — the one a
wise judicial decision, the other a most beneficent statute — came to
favour the personal freedom of British subjects. In 1670, Vaughan,
Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, laid it down that jurors cannot
legally be fined for verdicts given against the direction of the judge.
Henceforth juries, freed from all coercion, could safely give their
verdicts in accordance with the dictates of their conscience, guided
by the evidence produced before them. In 1679 the Habeas Cor-
pus Act once for all secured, save in cases of suspension by the will
of Parliament, the freedom of all subjects that obey the law of the
land. Under this statute, the name of which is taken from the
first words, in law Latin, of the written fiat of a judge sent to the
governor of a jail, the order " You must produce the body "
compels the production of a prisoner for trial before a legal court,
and prevents arbitrary imprisonment at the will of the crown
officers. Under severe penalties judges are bound, on application, to
issue the writ of Habeas Corpus, and governors of prisons must act
upon the order. It was further ordained that no prisoner must be
confined beyond the seas, and that, once acquitted, none shall be
committed to prison again on the same charge. The innocent
alone are sheltered by this law, which forces the guilty to submit
to speedy trial.
James the Second, by obstinate misrule, brought matters to a
speedy and decisive issue. The new king was sincerely convinced
l6 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
of the claims of his religion, the Roman Catholic faith secretly held,
and avowed on the bed of death, by his brother Charles. In devo-
tion to this faith, he threw away the excellent position bequeathed
to him, and strengthened by the abortive result of the foolish and
wicked enterprise of Monmouth. By the humble tone of his first
and only parliament, James was encouraged towards arbitrary
measures, and he had the promise of support from his brother's
old patron, the King of France. He chose his ministers, in 1687,
from the extreme Catholic section of his advisers, and, under the
"dispensing power" which he claimed and exercised, he virtually
annulled the Test Act, and proceeded to fill with Catholics, pro-
fessed or real, numerous posts in the army and civil service. The
universities were wronged and insulted by a new High Commission
Court for ecclesiastical affairs, and the Church of England was out-
raged both at Oxford and Cambridge, and in the person of her
prelates, arrested and tried for respectfully asking the sovereign
not to require them to violate the law of the land. Scotland,
harassed by religious persecution of the Covenanters, or advanced
Presbyterians, in the late reign, now saw the religious laws sus-
pended by royal prerogative, and old distrust of the Stuarts
prevented even moderate Presbyterians from being conciliated by
indulgence extended to themselves along with the Catholics, who
alone were admitted to office. In Ireland, the Catholics were
placed in a dominant position, and an army was being raised there
for the coercion of Great Britain.
The acquittal of the Seven Bishops gave the signal for action
to the Whig nobles who had long been negotiating with William
of Orange, nephew and son-in-law of James. That very able, brave,
and influential prince was the Protestant champion of Europe, and
the bitter and determined foe of Louis the Fourteenth, who was
aiming at, and had in large measure acquired, the position of a
dictator in continental affairs. The birth of an heir to James, in
June, 1688, decided William to accept the invitation of the Whig
leaders for an invasion of England with Dutch troops, who, in case
of need, would support an insurrection in behalf of the Protestant
religion and of the civil rights of the people of Great Britain.
James, left without support from any class of his subjects, and
unable to rely upon the army which he had raised, fled helplessly
to France, and after vain efforts to maintain, by French aid, a hold
GROWTH OF THE CONSTITUTION. 17
upon Ireland, he ceased from all personal connection with the
British Isles, and died an exile, and a pensioner of the generous
Louis, at St. Germains in 1701.
The cause of the Stuart king in Scotland, maintained at Killie-
crankie by Viscount Dundee, did not long survive the death of
the victor in the hour of triumph, and William the Third and his
wife, Mary the Second, daughter of James, became sovereigns of
the United Kingdoms early in 1689, on terms which, in the Bill
of Rights, amply secured for future subjects of the crown the main
substance, including germs to be thereafter developed, of complete
civil and religious freedom.
Such was the event called " the Glorious Revolution " ; one
which changed the dynasty, and, by creating a purely parliamentary
title for future holders of the royal position, completely did away
with the theory of " divine right ". Henceforth Parliament became
the chief power in the constitution, and the House of Commons,
controlling the public purse, was to be the stronger part of Parlia-
ment. The beneficent effects of this grand reform, " the fruitful
parent of reforms ", were quickly seen in the Toleration. Act,
which relieved Protestant dissenters from some of the penalties
of the Clarendon Code, and allowed them to worship freely in
their own way. They were still excluded, like the Catholics, from
municipal and other offices, to which the next century saw them
admitted by recognized evasions, and through the passing of in-
demnity bills. In 1695, when the House of Commons refused
to renew the act against unlicensed printing, the censorship came
to an end, and " freedom of the press " had its rise.
The foreign action of William the Third restored Britain to a
high position among the nations, and henceforth she had her full
share in continental affairs, and in the arrangements made for
the maintenance of the "balance of power". During William's
reign we have our first legal " standing army ", controlled by Parlia-
ment through an annual Mutiny Act and the power of the purse;
the origin of the national system of finance in a public loan, a
national debt, and the establishment of the Bank of England; and
an innovation which has since become an institution of the highest
importance, the first ministry, afterwards known as the " Cabinet ".
It was by slow degrees that, during the eighteenth century, this
body of men, never recognized by the law, became an executive
VOL. I.
1 8 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
and deliberative committee of the dominant party, or majority, in
the House of Commons, including peers of the same political views,
and invested with the attributes of united responsibility, concerted
action, and political unanimity on all important questions. At the
close of the reign, a clause in the Act of Settlement, which secured
the Protestant Hanoverian succession to the crown, made the judges
independent of the sovereign, by conferring on them a tenure of
office during good behaviour, and making it lawful to remove them
from their high and dignified positions only upon address to the
crown carried by vote in both Houses of Parliament. The death
of William the Third, in 1702, thus saw the constitutional freedom
of these realms, and the substance of public right in civil and reli-
gious affairs, established upon a basis which, for nearly two hundred
years, has never for a moment been shaken or disturbed.
CHAPTER III.
CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY DURING THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.
System of party government under Tories and Whigs — Union of England and Scotland —
Accession of the Hanoverian dynasty — The Septennial Act — Rebellions of 1715
and 1745— Walpole the first " prime minister " — George III. — Lord North and the
" King's friends" — John Wilkes — The Gordon Riots — Demand for reform of House
of Commons — Reform bills introduced by William Pitt — Freedom of the press
vindicated by Erskine and Fox — Political prosecutions— Independence of juries
established.
Under Queen Anne, the country saw the early growth of the
system of party government — Tories and Whigs — which has ever
since been the condition of our political existence. In politics,
as in religion, men have always held, and will hold, different
opinions, and when Parliament became the chief authority in
the state the only practical method of rule was one by which
the administration of affairs was intrusted in turns to rival parties,
struggling for place and power. As the House of Commons
held the control of taxation, and, by refusing supplies of money
needed for the public service, could bring the machine of govern-
ment to a stand, that House acquired the greatest weight in the
constitutional system, and political leaders, in one reign at least
vigorously helped by the sovereign, were ever striving to secure
THE CONSTITUTION IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 19
for their own party a majority of supporters in that assembly.
Hence came the " bribery and corruption ", the intimidation, the
gross revelry, the rioting, and other disorders attendant upon par-
liamentary elections,
The chief event of Anne's reign in domestic affairs was the
parliamentary union with Scotland, which had been aimed at
by James the First, effected for a brief space by Cromwell,
permitted to lapse at the Restoration, and strongly desired by
William the Third. After some vain attempts, in discussion be-
tween English and Scottish commissioners, and with a strong
opposition in Scotland, the measure was carried in 1707, and the
one kingdom of " Great Britain " was thus fully formed. The
succession to the throne, the parliament, the standards of coin,
weights, and measures, the laws of trade, customs, and excise were
to be the same for both countries. The Presbyterian Church was
to remain as the established religion of Scotland; the four Scottish
universities and the judicial administration were left as before,
except that an appeal was granted from decisions of the Court of
Session to the House of Lords. Scottish civil and criminal law
was retained, and in the Parliament of Great Britain, the northern
country was represented by forty-five members of the Commons,
and by sixteen Scottish peers, chosen for each parliament by the
whole body of their fellow-peers in Scotland, in the House of
Lords.
This great political change proved, after the subsidence of
mutual jealousies and suspicions, to be of great benefit to both
countries. England was freed from the constant danger of divided
interests which might end in civil war. The trading skill, energy,
and enterprise of the Scottish people were provided with a new
and free career. The vast growth of wealth in Scotland dates from
that auspicious event. The two peoples were, by degrees, knit
into one, and the peculiarities and diversities of national character
have long ceased to interfere with mutual kindness and respect.
On May ist, 1707, the hoisting of the flag called the Union Jack,
which blends the crosses of the patron saints, St. Andrew and
St. George, marked the completion of the union of Scotland and
England.
The accession to the British throne of George the First,
Elector of Hanover, created for Britain a new foreign policy, which
2O OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
was productive of much embarrassment and loss. In wars with
which we are not now concerned, this country was compelled to
provide, as far as might be, for the safety of her sovereign's con-
tinental dominions, in which his British subjects had no real interest.
The installation of the Hanoverian dynasty, or House of Brunswick,
had also some important effects on internal affairs. The new sove-
reign could not speak English, and none of his ministers could
speak or understand German, with the sole exception of Lord
Carteret. The king was thus left without influence on the Cabinet,
and, as he understood nothing of British affairs, parties, or politicians,
the power and patronage of the crown fell, for a long term of years,
into the hands of the oligarchy of Whig statesmen who had, at the
close of Anne's reign, favoured and promoted the German succes-
sion. For nearly fifty years the Whigs were supreme, maintaining
their power until a young sovereign born on British soil effected
their discomfiture, and brought the Tories to the front for a still
longer period of political control. The two Jacobite attempts
against the House of Hanover utterly failed. The Mar rebellion
of 1715 was altogether contemptible: James Stuart, the elder
Pretender, cut a very poor figure, and effected nothing beyond
causing some useless bloodshed at Sheriffmuir and at Preston,
followed by the execution of Lords Kenmure and Derwentwater.
The Septennial Act, still in force, giving to parliaments a possible
duration of seven years instead of three, was an important indirect
result of the '15.
The Scottish rising in 1745 appeared far more formidable.
The younger Pretender, " bonnie Prince Charlie " of Jacobite
song, was a much more attractive personage than his father,
and it is possible that, if he would have consented to change his
religious faith, he might have endangered the throne of George
the Second. England, however, would lend no support to a Stuart
claimant who was also a Catholic, and the advance of the High-
landers as far as Derby, which struck terror to faint hearts in the
capital, was followed by a retreat which, after one or two successes
over the royal troops, ended in the final collapse on Culloden Moor,
near Inverness. After this tragical event, and the cruelties per-
petrated by the soldiers of " butcher Cumberland", the Highlands
were, for the first time, really made subject to British rule, and the
construction of military roads, the opening up of the wild country
THE CONSTITUTION IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 21
to peaceful traffic, with the wise policy of enlisting the activity,
strength, and courage of the people in the service of the dynasty
which their sires had sought to dethrone, produced the happiest
results for law, order, and civilization. The colours borne by the
noble Highland regiments waved, seldom in defeat, never in dis-
grace, very often in glorious victory, on many a field of battle, and
a union of hearts came to hallow the political connection of north
and south.
Sir Robert Walpole's tenure of power as chief minister for over
twenty years, under George the First and his successor, was an
important matter in the history of the Cabinet as an institution.
He may probably be regarded as the first statesman who was "prime
minister". He established the principle of supremacy for one man
over his colleagues, and thenceforth a minister who might be at
variance with his chief was expected to resign his office. Previous
ministries had been often composed, by the sovereign's choice, of
men of both parties, without reference to the prevailing majority
in the House of Commons. Walpole insisted on leading a cabinet
composed of men who shared his views on all important points of
policy, and so he gave the model of ministries such as we now see
in charge of the work of government. The head of the ministry
was, in those days, selected by the king, and maintained in power,
if need were, by the purchase of votes in the House of Commons.
Hard cash, pensions, sinecures, well-paid offices, garters, and stars,
were at the minister's disposal for the purposes of corruption, and
only repeated defeats in the Commons, or a great display of public
feeling, could drive an obnoxious statesman from power. The
remedies for this condition of affairs, a great extension of the
franchise and a redistribution of political power among constitu-
encies, were matters which, in Walpole's day, lay in a future
removed from him by nearly a century. Some progress was made
in the direction of religious freedom. From the year 1728 onwards,
an Act of Indemnity was annually passed, freeing Protestant dis-
senters from the penalties of the Test Act, when they had held
municipal offices against the statute. Walpole, however, Whig
though he was, opposed and defeated motions for the repeal of the
act itself. He was unwilling to wound the prejudices of church-
men, or to meddle with the existing settlement of ecclesiastical
affairs.
22 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
The accession of George the Third brought to the throne a
young sovereign trained in somewhat high notions of the regal
position and prerogative, and resolved to carry those ideas into
practice. He found himself possessed of enormous wealth and
influence through the income derived from the large "civil list"
granted by parliament for England and Ireland; the hereditary
revenues of Scotland; the great revenues obtained from his German
territory ; and the patronage of posts in church and state. The
sovereign, from the first, employed these ample resources of cor-
ruption to obtain majorities in parliament, and the strong will
described by his opponents as "obstinacy", with his persistent
attention to what was daily passing in the Commons, enabled him
to wield an authority unknown to his two predecessors. Men in
high place were freely punished for daring to oppose the royal will
on public affairs. Lord-lieutenants thus incurred summary dis-
missal, and office-holders of lower class were removed for votes in
the Commons hostile to a minister supported by the king.
The Tories were now restored to political power, and the Whigs,
divided into factious groups, were mostly left in the cold shade of
opposition. In 1770 a prime minister was found, in the person
of Lord North, who was content to be simply the servant of the
sovereign, and in public policy to carry out his will. He had at his
disposal, in the House of Commons, a body of men known as the
"king's friends". This "reptile species of politicians" was never
before and never since known in this country. They were mem-
bers of no party, and had no political ties, except those which bound
them to the throne. They were holders of places of much emolu-
ment, little work, and no responsibility. Secure in such posts
under all changes of cabinet office, they were content to support
the king against any ministry or minister whose measures he dis-
liked, and to thwart at every turn those who opposed the royal
views.
At this period of our political history, we find existing a
House of Commons which, largely composed of the nominees of
the crown or of great nobles, and elected on a narrow franchise,
showed a tyrannous spirit towards the rights of electors, and was
bitterly jealous of public interference with what were deemed to
be parliamentary privileges. In the case of John Wilkes, the
choice of the Middlesex electors was set aside again and again with
THE CONSTITUTION IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 23
deliberate and insolent injustice. In 1771, the House of Commons
engaged in a conflict with the lord mayor and other city magis-
trates in a matter affecting the right of printers to publish reports
of the debates. In 1728 and in 1738 the House had declared any
publication of speeches made in parliament to be a breach of
privilege. The times had now changed. The original cause of
secrecy for debates, which was to enable members to escape royal
wrath against free utterances, had ceased with the close of Stuart
times, when Parliament acquired supreme power in the state. The
House of Commons, under George the Third, was seeking, in
fact, to escape responsibility to the nation at large. The public
press was acquiring yearly greater influence on opinion, and it was
of high importance to the public interests that the sayings and
doings of members of the Commons, within the walls of their
House, should be known outside. In both the cases here mentioned,
the cause of public freedom won the day. Wilkes was soon quietly
allowed to take his seat for Middlesex, and from 1771 onwards
there was practically free reporting of debates.
A small step towards the rights of citizenship for the Catholic
subjects of the crown was taken in 1778, when a severe act of 1700
was repealed. That statute had subjected to heavy penalties the
celebration of the mass, and had prohibited Catholics from pur-
chasing land, with many restrictions on its acquirement by in-
heritance. This disgraceful law had from the first been left almost
devoid of practical effect, and the Gordon or No Popery riots of
1 780, which were due to its repeal, are the strongest possible proof
of the degraded ignorance, little more than a century ago, of the
population of London. Without the shadow of a grievance, at the
summons of a madman, a hundred thousand people rose in insur-
rection; For nearly a week anarchy existed in the greatest and
wealthiest of European cities. The houses of Parliament were
besieged by the mob, and lay peers and bishops were forced to
flee. The chapels of foreign ambassadors, buildings made sacred
by the law of nations, were destroyed. The house of a chief justice
was demolished. Thirty-six fires were blazing at once in London.
Before order was restored through the firmness of the king, who
set the troops to work, more than five hundred persons were shot
down by musketry.
As the close of the eighteenth century drew near, a strong
24 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
feeling arose in favour of reform in the constitution of the House
of Commons. New towns were rising into political importance,
and desired representation in Parliament. There were many
thoughtful persons who wished to break up the system of influence
by which the crown and the great land-owners contrived to nom-
inate a considerable portion of members of the Commons. Some
small reforms were made in 1782. Revenue officers, a class
obviously under government control, were disfranchised. Public
contractors were prevented from sitting in the Commons, and some
changes were made in the civil list, which abolished useless
offices, and limited the number and value of pensions. Some bills
for parliamentary reform, introduced by the younger William Pitt,
suffered rejection in the House of Commons, and the whole subject
was set aside by the reaction due to the excesses of the great
French Revolution in 1 789. Amongst minor changes in favour of
religious freedom, we may here record the relief of dissenting
ministers and schoolmasters from the declaration required by the
Toleration Act, against the Roman Catholic doctrine of t^ansub-
stantiation, and in favour of the doctrine of the Trinity. This was
carried in 1779. Three years later, Protestant dissenters were
allowed to celebrate marriages in their own chapels. All proposi-
tions for the repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts of Charles
the Second's reign, with a view to the admission of Catholics to
municipal offices and to seats in Parliament, were rejected in the
House of Commons.
Towards the end of the century, freedom of the press was nobly
vindicated by the most brilliant of all advocates, Thomas Erskine,
sometime lord chancellor of England, and by Charles James Fox,
one of the greatest of Whig statesmen. Erskine, in the very year
(1778) that he was called to the bar, sprang at one bound, by a
single speech, into the foremost rank. He was junior counsel, with
four others, in defence, on a trial for libel, of Captain Baillie,
governor of Greenwich Hospital. That noble institution, then the
home of England's gallant and war-worn seamen, was at that time
grossly abused. The first lord of the admiralty, a certain wicked
Lord Sandwich, was in the habit of introducing into the hospital
as inmates men who were not sailors at all. This was done simply
for the purposes of electoral corruption. Baillie, after vain remon-
strance, exposed the matter in a pamphlet, and was prosecuted
THE CONSTITUTION IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 25
criminally for libel. The real though not the nominal prosecutor
was Sandwich, and Erskine, in his magnificent speech, boldly un-
masked his lordship by name, and vindicated the right of censuring
with severity the mal-administration of a public institution. In
other cases the same great forensic orator rendered priceless
services to the cause of freedom.
After the outbreak of the French Revolution, societies formed
in England to advocate change were stirred to fresh life. There
was the "London Corresponding Society", to urge Radical
opinions. In 1792, the association called the "Friends of the
People" was established, embracing many men who were eminent
in politics and literature, with Erskine and other members of
parliament. Pitt, following rather the feeling of his supporters in
parliament and outside than his own judgment, adopted severe
repressive measures. The Habeas Corpus Act was suspended.
Many respectable persons who urged reform were severely pun-
ished by imprisonment, the pillory, and heavy fines, for "seditious"
words. The "Scottish martyrs", Palmer and Muir, were trans-
ported for "sedition", and a Traitorous Correspondence Act made
it "treason" to hold any intercourse with France without special
permission under the great seal. In 1794, prosecutions for "sedi-
tion" and "treason" continued. Skirving, the secretary of an
Edinburgh meeting of the "Friends of the People", was transported,
and Watt was executed for treason. Then came a Treasonable
Practices Bill, by which writing, printing, preaching, or speaking
to incite the people to hatred or contempt of the king, or the
established government and constitution of the realm, was made
a "high misdemeanour". The Seditious Meetings Bill forbade
the assemblage of more than fifty persons for considering peti-
tions or addresses for alteration of matters in church or state, or
for discussing any grievance, without previous notice to, and the
attendance of, a magistrate, who should act as censor on any pro-
position or discourse. All remonstrance in Parliament was vain;
the measures were carried by large majorities, and in 1 799, an
Act was passed suppressing the United Societies and the London
Corresponding Society, as well as all debating clubs.
Such was the benign system of rule under which the grand-
fathers of men now middle-aged were living in the last days of
the eighteenth century, and the mere statement of the facts, com-
26 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
pared with the existing system under Queen Victoria, is an
eloquent exposition of "good old times", and a standard by which
we may measure the progress made in constitutional freedom.
While the spirit of tyrannical repression was thus rampant, while
new laws were gagging free-born Britons, and statutes were strained
to punish common liberty of utterance in speech and print; while
the courts were daily occupied with the discussion and determina-
tion of grave constitutional problems, Erskine was eagerly and
honourably prominent on the side of that temperate freedom which
Britons have in many a contest made their own inalienable posses-
sion. Thoroughly understanding the principles of the British
constitution, and never committing the error of vindicating freedom
by an appeal to abstract rights or to a false philosophy, Erskine
was often able to bring juries over to the side of liberty and
reason even in the midst of the terror aroused by the excesses of the
French Revolution, and to coerce into impartiality and fairness of
exposition judges who were only too ready to interpret the laws in
a despotic sense. It was thus that in 1794 he procured the
acquittal of Hardy and Home Tooke, charged with treason as
members of the London Corresponding Society.
One of the most important points with which Erskine had to
deal was the state of the law of libel. In 1764, Lord Mansfield,
chief justice of the King's Bench, had decided that, in cases of
prosecution for libel, the jury were only to deal with the fact of
publication, leaving it to the judge to decide on the libellous
character of the matter implicated. This doctrine, if it were
maintained, clearly put the liberty of the press at the mercy of
judges appointed by the crown, and went far towards re-establishing
in England the hateful Star Chamber of the worst times of Stuart
tyranny. From this peril the press of Britain was saved mainly
by the courageous and brilliant advocacy of Erskine. Twenty
years after Mansfield's decision, in 1784, Dr. Shipley, the Dean
of St. Asaph, was prosecuted for publishing a seditious libel in the
form of a pamphlet on the principles of government, written by his
brother-in-law, the famous scholar, Sir William Jones. In this
pamphlet was laid down the not very monstrous doctrine of the
right and duty of resistance to lawless tyranny. After Erskine's
speech for the defence, the jury found Dr. Shipley "guilty of pub-
lishing only". Mr. Justice Buller, a narrow-minded lawyer who
BRITAIN AT WAR IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 27
presided at the trial, induced the jury, after much brow-beating,
to omit the last word, and to leave to the Court the decision as to
whether the publication were a libel or not. This verdict was
recorded, and the law thus again laid down was justly regarded as
a heavy blow at freedom. Erskine then moved for a new trial,
and his argument in support of this motion is a most masterly
and exhaustive defence of the right of juries to decide on the
substance of a libel, as well as on the fact of its publication. The
court declined to sustain his view, but the cause thus defeated in
the law-courts won not long afterwards a signal triumph in Parlia-
ment. In 1792, Fox carried his Libel Bill, reversing Lord
Mansfield's and the late decisions, and giving to juries full scope
in libel cases. Thus was secured the freedom of the press, which,
in the words of Junius, "is the palladium of all the civil, political,
and religious rights of an Englishman"; thus was maintained "the
right of juries to return a general verdict, in all cases whatsoever,
as an essential part of our constitution, not to be controlled or
limited by the judges, not, in any shape, questionable by the
legislature".
CHAPTER IV.
BRITAIN AT WAR IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.
Britain's military position during the reigns of William III. and Anne — Duke of
Marlborough — Peace of Utrecht — War of the Austrian Succession — The Seven
Years' War — William Pitt, Clive, and Wolfe — Admirals Rodney, Hood, and Hyde
Parker — Peace of Versailles — The French Revolution — The "Young Corsican" at
Toulon— Sir Sidney Smith, Horatio Nelson, and Lord Howe — Arthur Wellesley —
Buonaparte's threatened invasion— Victory off Cape St. Vincent — Naval Mutinies —
Victory at Camperdown — Buonaparte's expedition to Egypt — Victories of the Nile
and Alexandria — Continental combination against Britain — Battle of Copenhagen —
Peace of Amiens — Result of the wars in the expansion of British trade and colonial
possessions.
The contests waged against France under William the Third and
Queen Anne completely restored Great Britain to the position in
Europe which had been lost during the two previous reigns. The
ambitious schemes of Louis the Fourteenth were decisively checked,
and his country was reduced to exhaustion. The military credit
of England was more than merely revived. William, one of the com-
28 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
manders who met almost constant defeat without incurring serious
loss of repute as a general, headed our first regular army. Noth-
ing could exceed his courage, or his resolution after ill-success, and
the soldiers whom he led into battle were worthy of their general.
He was pitted, however, against the best armies of that age,
organized by the genius of Louvois, and commanded with great
ability by Luxembourg, and he failed, save in the capture of
Namur, to obtain the victories which he fully deserved. The
consummate skill of Maryborough, backed by the utmost bravery
in our troops, deprived the French of the proud military position
which they had held in Europe since the decline of Spain. The
British army was thenceforth known as one composed of men
invincible in a fair field, against equal numbers and leadership.
Blenheim, Ramillies, and Oudenarde dissipated for ever Louis'
dreams of European conquest, and nothing but political intrigues,
depriving Marlborough of his command, prevented him from
marching in victorious strength, at the head of his gallant army
and with the allies led by his noble colleague, Prince Eugene, to
the gates of Paris, and dictating terms to the French monarch
within the walls of his capital. The British navy had asserted its
power in the battle of La Hogue, when the courage of the sailors had
wrung from the exiled James high eulogies for those whom he saw
destroying, at the close of the struggle, the very ships intended to
strive for his restoration to his lost kingdom.
After the Peace of Utrecht there came a lull of warfare for a
time. That treaty had left a Bourbon prince upon the throne of
Spain, and the countries thus connected by dynastic ties will soon
be found engaged in fresh contests against the hated power which,
in the Armada fight, and on the soil of Bavaria and Flanders, had
lowered their pride by sea and land. The time is filled with
diplomatic jargon of "Pragmatic Sanctions" concerning the house
of Austria, " Family Compacts" between the sovereigns of the
house of Bourbon, and much else that, in the words of Carlyle, as
he treats of this period, "we will forget". The War of the Aus-
trian Succession, waged from 1741 to 1748, gave Britain a victory
at Dettingen, when George the Second, brave if little else, was
the last of our sovereigns to lead troops in battle, and dismounting
from his horse, went on sword in hand, cheering his " brave boys ".
Our defeat at Fontenoy, under the Duke of Cumberland, was made
BRITAIN AT WAR IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 29
glorious by the courage of a British brigade, advancing against a
host of foes, with cannon playing on their front and on both flanks,
and retiring, after vain efforts, in a steady and heroic form that the
gallant Frenchmen could not forbear to praise. The great contest
known as the Seven Years War, from 1756 to 1763, had its
triumphs, as we shall see, on other fields than those of Europe.
We showed the world, as the great Frederick of Prussia declared,
" a man " at last, in William Pitt the elder, better known as Earl
of Chatham. In East and West, Clive and Plassey, Wolfe and
Quebec, became immortal names. In Europe, the naval disgrace
incurred at Minorca by the hapless Byng was more than retrieved
by Boscawen at Lagos Bay, and by Hawke on the iron-bound
coast of Brittany. The Duke of Cumberland's ignominious capitu-
lation, with forty thousand Hanoverian troops, at Kloster-seven,
and the loss of Hanover, were followed by a British share in the
victory of Minden, when the second general of that age, Ferdinand
of Brunswick, overcame the French. Before the war closed, the
two chief colonial towns of Spain, Havana in Cuba, and Manilla
on the Philippines, became, with a vast booty, the prey of Britain,
glorious prizes of combined naval and military force, tamely restored,
in exchange for the then worthless Florida, by the ministry of the day.
In the momentous contest which endured from 1775 to 1783,
Great Britain met at last the three chief maritime powers in their
combined strength, France and Holland and Spain. Since the
days of Van Tromp, save for a brief space before the victory of
La Hogue, the dwellers on the southern shores of Britain had
never seen a hostile fleet sailing defiant and unattacked in the
waters of the Channel. More than once or twice this spectacle
was presented during that perilous time. Action after action was
fought against the enemy's ships. In January, 1780, Rodney
captured or destroyed eight Spanish vessels off Cape St. Vincent.
Hood, with nineteen men-of-war, fought a drawn battle in 1781
against twenty-eight French ships, under De Grasse, on the Vir-
ginian coast. In the same year, Hyde Parker defeated the Dutch
in their own waters.
By slow degrees our strength at sea was asserted and main-
tained against these formidable odds, and the naval part of the
struggle was gloriously closed by Rodney's brilliant exploit in the
West Indian waters. The united force of France and Spain,
3<D OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
among those islands, amounted to sixty ships of the line, and all
our possessions in that part of the world had been captured by
the foe except Barbadoes, Antigua, and Jamaica. In February,
1782, Sir George Rodney, the commander-in-chief on the West
India station, arrived at Barbadoes with twelve line-of- battle ships.
A great French armament was preparing against Jamaica, and at
this crisis Rodney was joined by Sir Samuel Hood's squadron.
With three more ships arrived from home, Rodney now had thirty-
six sail. Hood's old antagonist, the Comte de Grasse, put to sea
on April 8th with thirty-three first-rates, including his flag-ship, the
Ville de Paris, of 1 10 guns, one of the finest vessels afloat. There
were thousands of troops on board the French vessels for the
intended land operations at Jamaica. Rodney at once weighed
anchor, and started from St. Lucia, eager to close before De
Grasse could be joined by Spanish ships. After a partial action
between Hood and the enemy, a general battle was engaged in
on April i2th, in the waters between the islands Mariegalante,
Dominica, and Guadeloupe. From seven in the morning till sun-
set a fierce contest raged, as the British ships came up, received
from Rodney the signal for close combat, and laid themselves in
turn along the enemy's line. Yard-arm to yard-arm lay the ships,
pouring in shot that could not miss their mark, and that wrought
fearful havoc on the crowded decks of the French. About noon, the
British admiral executed the daring and splendid manoeuvre — fol-
lowed with sublime effect by Nelson at the Nile — of breaking the
enemy's line. His flagship, the Formidable, found an opening
about three ships from the centre, where De Grasse was lying
with the Ville de Paris. Rodney was followed by other ves-
sels, and they all doubled round upon the hostile ships, and
brought part of the enemy under fire on both sides. The French
line was completely broken, and thrown into utter disorder by this
revived mode of attack, practised in the 1 7th century against the
Dutch, the merit of which, as a modern invention or theory, has
been assigned to Mr. Clerk, the author of a very able treatise on
naval tactics, published about the time that Rodney left London to
take up his command. The credit has been also claimed by Sir
Charles Douglas for his father, Rodney's flag-captain on the
Formidable, as suggesting to the admiral that the line should be
broken, at the moment when the opportunity arose. However
ADMIRAL RODNEY DIRECTS THE BATTLE ON BOARD
THE FORMIDABLE.
A great French fleet, under the Comte de Grasse, arrived in the West
Indies, early in 1782, with orders to attack Jamaica. In April it was
sighted by the British fleet under Sir George Rodney, and almost at once
a fierce contest began. About noon the British Admiral, by a skilful
manoeuvre, thrust his flagship through the enemy's line, and ranging up
on his weather side, brought several of the French ships under a cross-
fire. This new method of attack threw the enemy's fleet into disorder, and
at length the French Admiral pulled down his flag in sign of surrender.
Five other ships were taken, one was sunk, and the remainder were scat-
tered to the four winds.
(i)
W. H. OVEREND.
ADMIRAL RODNEY DIRECTS THE BATTLE
ON BOARD THE FORMIDABLE.
Vol. i. p. 30, 31.
BRITAIN AT WAR IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 3t
that may be, it is certain that Rodney was the first naval comman-
der of his time to carry the idea into execution, and that to him
belongs the credit of promptly seizing the chance presented to him
with the coolness of a hero who has all his faculties under com-
mand amidst the roaring of cannon, the eddying of smoke, the
crashing of torn timbers, and the cries of men maimed by wounds,
or excited by the spirit of deadly strife. A grand success rewarded
the skill and courage of British seamen. The French admiral, in
his great vessel, was compelled at the very close of the battle to
strike his flag to Hood, in the Barfleur. Five other large ships
were taken, one was sunk, and the remainder were scattered in
flight towards various ports, no more to be united in hostile array
during the continuance of the war. The carnage on the Ville de
Paris was seen to, be terrific, when an officer went aboard to receive
the admiral's sword. Most of De Grasse's officers were killed or
wounded, and only two or three stood with him on the quarter-
deck. The swift-falling darkness of tropical climes prevented
instant pursuit, and a three days' calm off Guadeloupe caused
further delay to the victor. A week later, however, Hood over-
took five French ships, and captured two frigates and two seventy-
fours. The Ville de Paris and another prize, the Glorieux, never
reached England, having foundered in a storm off Newfoundland.
Thus was Jamaica saved, and the pride of Britain in her navy
restored. This war was ended in January, 1783, by the Peace of
Versailles.
The next great struggle, ten years later, was the first war
with France, after the Revolution of 1 789. This contest continued
for nine years, from 1793 to 1802, and was marked by great
events on sea and land, for the last of which we must for a
moment overstep the bounds of the eighteenth century. In its
earlier stages, little credit was won by British arms in military
operations. George the Third's second son, the Duke of York,
was no match for the French generals, leading hosts of men who,
well trained to war, after some preliminary failures, were also filled
with a fierce revolutionary spirit, eager to encounter the soldiers of
a monarchy. In 1793 the British troops, under York, with Ger-
man allies, defeated the French republicans near Valenciennes, and
that fortified town was taken. In the same year, however, Toulon,
captured for the French royalists by a British expedition under
32 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Lord Hood, was recovered for the new French state by the skill
of a young Corsican colonel of artillery, aged twenty-four years,
whose name was Napoleon Buonaparte. It is remarkable that
among his English antagonists there was the future foiler of his
plans for Oriental conquest, Sir Sidney Smith, of Acre renown.
Men of the highest order kept coming to the front in those
stirring days. In 1794, when Corsica was reduced by Lord Hood,
a young naval captain lost his right eye at the siege of Calvi. His
name was Horatio Nelson. The naval might and fame of Britain
were fully maintained in the same year, on "the glorious first of
June", when Lord Howe gained his splendid victory over the Brest
fleet, and frustrated a design for the invasion of England. The
British and Hanoverians, under the Duke of York, had some suc-
cesses, with Austrians and Prussians, against the republican armies
in the north-east of France, but in May the duke was surrounded by
larger French forces, and barely escaped personal capture, losing
fifty guns. In the winter of 1794, our troops, though no longer
under the same incompetent commander, were driven by the
French from Holland into Westphalia, and in March, 1795, they
were forced to embark at Bremen and return to England. A
redeeming feature of this ignominious and disastrous retreat was
the skill and resolution displayed in the rear-guard by the young
colonel of the 33rd regiment of the line. His name was Arthur
Wellesley. Holland was at this time overrun and subjugated by
the French, and her naval forces were turned against us by the
conquerors.
At the close of 1795, Buonaparte haa risen to the highest
military position in France, and the following year saw him
victorious over Austria in northern Italy. At this juncture, Spain
joined the ranks of Britain's enemies, and our fleets were again
confronted by the combined naval forces of the three chief con-
tinental maritime countries. An invasion of England was again
planned, and squadrons were gathered at Brest, Cadiz, and at the
island of Texel on the Dutch coast. The British tars, forced to
serve as many of them were by the cruel system of impressment,
half-starved and half-poisoned by insufficient and bad Tood in the
iniquitous and corrupt naval system of those times, driven at last
by ill-treatment to open mutiny of a formidable kind, were the
saviours of their country at this portentous and perilous time.
BRITAIN AT WAR IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 33
In February, 1797, Sir John Jervis, with fifteen sail of the line,
attacked and smartly defeated, off Cape St. Vincent, a Spanish fleet
of more than double his own force. Several of the greatest ships
of the enemy were taken. Commodore Nelson, the second in
command, in his ship the Captain, of seventy-four guns, disobeyed
his superior's signal, and closed with three huge Spanish vessels,
the Santissima Trinidad, of 136 guns, the San Josef, of 112, and
the Salvador del Mundo, of equal force. The San Nicolas, of 80
guns, and three other Spanish liners, were close at hand. Thomas
Trowbridge, in the Culloden, came up to the rescue, and Nelson's
dearest friend, Cuthbert Collingwood, was eager to help and to
save. The Captain was reduced to a mere wreck, when Nelson,
sword in hand, led the boarders on to the capture of the San
Nicolas, and then, crying "Westminster Abbey, or victory!",
bounded on to the San Josef, and was at once master of another
prize. It is well to remind the reader that Nelson's name was not
even mentioned in the official letter of Jervis, who was created
Earl St. Vincent. That just and generous man was hampered, it
is supposed, by some official ideas of etiquette, and by Nelson's
daring and, in this case, most useful disobedience of orders. In a
private letter his merit was acknowledged by his superior, and the
nation soon learnt the truth. The same year was made note-
worthy by the naval mutinies at Spithead and the Nore, outbreaks
which were quieted by concessions, by firm measures, and by the
influence of two commanders justly beloved by our seamen, Lord
Howe, and the noble Admiral Duncan. The Spanish navy had
been roughly handled, but the French and Dutch ships were to
meet, with troops on board, for a landing in Ireland, where, as we
shall see, a rebellion had been arranged. The great victory of
Duncan at Camperdown, on the coast of Holland opposite Yar-
mouth, put an end to this project. The Dutch fleet, of fifteen line-
of-battle ships, commanded by the brave and skilful De Winter,
was attacked by an equal force, and after a desperate engagement,
worthy on both sides of the traditionary naval heroism of Stuart
days, the enemy lost eight sail of the line and three frigates, which
were brought as prizes to England.
Buonaparte, on the failure of attempts against the British Isles,
turned his thoughts to conquest in the East. He was now
virtually supreme in France, as the chief man in the republican
VOL. I.
34 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
government called the Directory, and a powerful expedition, under
his command, started for Egypt, as the first great stride towards
an attack on our possessions in India. A number of men-of-war
and transports carried twenty thousand troops to Alexandria.
The Turkish soldiers were defeated in the "battle of the
Pyramids"; the famous Mameluke cavalry succumbed; Cairo
was taken, and the lower valley of the Nile was in French hands.
On August ist, 1798, the enemy were cut off from the power
of return to France by Nelson's victory at the Nile. The French
fleet was almost destroyed, and Buonaparte, early in 1799, aim-
ing now at an overland expedition to India, marched from Egypt
into Syria. At the key of that country, the famous fortress of
St. Jean d'Acre, a scene of Cceur de Lion's valour against Saladin
in the second Crusade, the French general received a rude shock
to his own and his soldiers' belief in his invincibility on land. A
siege of sixty days, in which the power of Turks in defence,
armed with sabre and dagger to meet assaults with the bayonet,
was brilliantly displayed, ended in the utter discomfiture of the
best efforts made by heroism and skill. A body of British sea-
men and marines, led by Sir Sidney Smith, gave most important
aid, and caused Buonaparte, many years later, in his exile at
St. Helena, to declare of the British seaman, " That man made
me miss my destiny".
The French general then made his way back to France, where
he became sole master, with the title of First Consul. His hatred
to Britain was confirmed by Pitt's rejection of his overtures for
peace, and by our government's refusal to recognize his new official
position as head of the French republic. In 1799 another attempt
against the French in Holland failed. Some battles were won, in
conjunction with Russian troops, the military abilities of Sir John
Moore and Sir Ralph Abercrombie being employed on our side.
In the end, however, the sinister presence of the Duke of York as
commander-in-chief made itself felt, and he retired from the country
in the autumn, by an arrangement with the French and Dutch
commanders, which was virtually a capitulation on favourable
terms. A large Dutch squadron surrendered to our Admiral
Mitchell, and the enemy's schemes for an invasion of Britain were
made as futile as were our efforts, at that time, to cope with French
forces on the Continent.
BRITAIN AT WAR IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 35
Pitt now resolved to expel the French forces from Egypt, and
Sir Ralph Abercrombie was sent thither with fifteen thousand men.
In March, 1801, the first division of our troops, in face of a tre-
mendous fire of shot, shell, grape, and musketry, landed at Aboukir
Bay, and, with the most brilliant courage, drove off the opposing
French with the bayonet. Their main army, under Menou, was
soon afterwards defeated by Abercrombie, one of our best com-
manders, at the battle of Aboukir, or Alexandria, where the gallant
and able Scot received a fatal wound. His successor, General
Hutchinson, took Rosetta, Cairo, and Alexandria, and the French
troops, on their surrender, were sent back to France in British
ships. Thus ended Buonaparte's efforts towards the Eastern
world.
The scene of conflict next draws our eyes to the north of
Europe. The insane emperor Paul of Russia had formed with
Sweden and Denmark an "armed neutrality", to resist by force
the British claim to stop and search neutral vessels for "contra-
band of war", or stores for warlike use which such ships might
be conveying to our foes. Prussia joined the hostile ranks early
in 1801: Hanover was occupied, and the north German rivers,
the Weser, Ems, and Elbe, were closed against our ships. The
government resolved to strike hard and fast at Denmark, the only
member of the coalition which possessed a strong naval force. In
the fierce battle of Copenhagen, fought on April 2nd, Nelson, again
the real hero of the occasion, now as second to Sir Hyde Parker,
brought the Danes to terms, and caused their retirement from the
combination against Britain. The alliance had already, unknown
to Nelson at the time, received its death-blow by the assassination,
on March 24th, of the Russian emperor. His son and successor,
Alexander the First, at once made peace, and long remained on
friendly terms with this country. The struggle ended for a brief
space by the truce known as the Peace of Amiens, concluded on
March 25th, 1802, between Great Britain, France, Holland, and
Spain.
These contests of the eighteenth century have an interest
apart from and beyond the details which display British energy
and courage. The struggles by sea and land which were so
eventful and, on the whole, so glorious to our arms, were, above
all, important in their real aims and results. They were wars
36 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
waged for trade and for colonial rule. The crisis of modern
British history came in the days of the Armada. It was then
that our forefathers awoke to a sense of the great destinies that
were reserved for the British race. The very bigotry of the time,
an evil thing in itself, but overruled, like other evils, for high
ends controlled by a supreme Power, aided the new spirit whose
workings have been immortalized by Charles Kingsley in West-
ward Ho! a story which no real, undegenerate Englishman can
read without delight and pride. Who were the hated Spaniards
—this was the cry — the professors of a false faith, the desolators
of the Netherlands, at once the victims and the upholders of the
Inquisition, that they should inherit and hold the world? True,
that in the last days of Elizabeth we. had yet no possessions
beyond the borders of Europe. During the seventeenth century
we were mainly given up to internal constitutional struggles, but
Cromwell, fanatic, tyrant in his own despite, the conqueror of
his own countrymen, was moved by the old spirit of later Tudor
times when he wrested Jamaica from Spain and founded a do-
minion in the sunny West Indian isles.
Britain had begun that wonderful expansion which was to carry
her flag round the world. The growth of our trade under Walpole
as first minister made British merchants eager for new markets,
and the industrial development, soon to be traced on these pages,
of the latter half of the eighteenth century, gave an irresistible im-
pulse to the aspirations after wider territory. Chatham, the em-
bodiment of British character in its energy and courage, rose to the
occasion, and "the hour and the man" were happily combined. The
eighteenth century, so often and so long regarded by the shallow
and the ill-informed as a dull and ignoble period of our annals,
as they look at kings and courts and the wranglings of politicians,
was the era of great contests which were to determine the posses-
sion of new worlds to the East and to the West, on the shores
of the Atlantic and the Pacific, in Indian seas, and far away to
the south, verging even on Antarctic waters. With France and
Spain, with Louis the Fifteenth, Louis the Sixteenth, the Revolu-
tion, and with Napoleon, we fought, at the expense of hundreds
of millions of pounds, not merely for the flag, and for our inde-
pendence and freedom, but for the trade which ever " follows the
flag", for the possession of great and distant lands which were
THE BRITISH TROOPS FORCE A LANDING AT ABOUKIR
BAY IN FACE OF THE FRENCH BATTERIES.
In 1798 Buonaparte, who was then virtually ruler of France, determined
to conquer Egypt, as a preliminary to an attack on the British possessions
in India. With twenty thousand men he defeated the Turkish army in
the Battle of the Pyramids, and in a short time the whole of the lower
valley of the Nile was in French hands. In the following year, however,
Nelson destroyed the French fleet at the battle of the Nile, and it was then
decided by the British Government to drive Buonaparte from Egypt. To
that end Sir Ralph Abercrombie was despatched to Aboukir Bay, where
he successfully landed his army under a tremendous fire from the French
batteries. Soon afterwards he met and defeated the whole French army,
and in so doing ended Napoleon's conquests in the East.
(2)
BRITAIN AT WAR IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 37
either richly provided already with populations to receive the
products of our looms, or had "ample verge and room enough"
for emigrants from our shores. In America and in Asia, as we
shall see, we were face to face with our old European foes, the
French, and a decisive duel ensued for mastery in those regions.
Compared with this issue, the European part of the contest which
lasted, with intervals, from 1740 to 1783, becomes of slight
significance. These were our first wars on the larger scale, when
our ships and men were engaged in almost every quarter of the
globe. The hostility of Napoleon to Britain, armed as he was
with the material resources of the great country which he ruled,
and, by conquest, of much that lay outside the borders of France,
was also, as we have partly seen in dealing with Egypt, fiercely
spurred by ambition which had fixed an eager eye upon empire,
not in Europe, but in Asia.
The eighteenth century, thus viewed, becomes for us the grand
epoch of British colonial extension, so far as it was secured by the
achievements of armies and fleets. The British navy became irre-
sistible : Britain was shown forth as the undisputed mistress of the
seas. Able to guard her merchant ships by escorts of men-of-war
which could crush the spasmodic efforts of foes whose great fleets
had perished in pitched battles of signal victory for the islanders,
she spread her goods abroad, ruined the trade of her foes, and
established a commercial ascendency long to endure without any
hope for would-be rivals. We will elsewhere describe the de-
velopment at home of the industrial resources which supplied this
country with the pecuniary means of conducting this gigantic
struggle to the successful issue sealed by the Peace of 1815.
38 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
CHAPTER V.
STATE OF IRELAND DURING THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.
Penal laws against the Roman Catholics — Restrictions upon Irish industries and trade —
The Irish Parliament — Flood and Grattan — Convention of Dungannon— " White-
boys" and "United Irishmen" — Formation of "Orange" lodges — Cruelties prac-
tised on the Roman Catholics — Irish rebellion of 1798 — Act for union with Great
Britain passed.
For nearly a century after the last conquest of Ireland, under
William the Third, that unhappy country was quiescent with the
apathy of exhaustion, misery, and despair. In Elizabeth's reign
the native Celts had been hunted like wild beasts; their faith
had been proscribed ; their lands had been largely confiscated.
Great further land robberies were perpetrated in the days of
James the First, his son Charles, Cromwell, and William the
Third. In one quarter alone, Ulster, the Protestant " plantation "
of Scottish and English settlers, formed by James the First,
was there any real prosperity. After the surrender of Limerick
in 1691, the treaty which promised religious freedom to the
Catholics was grossly violated, and they were made subject
to the action of severe "penal laws", passed in the Irish parlia-
ment, an assembly composed of Protestant lords, and of members
returned for boroughs controlled by the crown or by patrons or
by close corporations, and for counties dominated in election affairs
by great proprietors of land. Catholics were not permitted to keep
school; to go beyond seas, or to send others thither, for education
in the Romish religion. Intermarriage with Protestants was dis-
allowed, in case of the possession of an estate in Ireland. Children
of mixed marriages were always to be brought up in the Protest-
ant faith. A " Papist" could not be guardian to any child, nor
hold land, nor possess arms. He could not hold a commission in
the army or navy, or be a private soldier. No Catholic could
hold any office of honour or emolument in the state, or be a
member of any corporation, or vote for members of the Commons,
or, if he were a peer, sit or vote in the Lords. Almost all these
personal disabilities were equally enforced by law against any
Protestant who married a Catholic wife. It was a felony, with
transportation, to teach the Catholic religion, and treason, as a
IRELAND DURING EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 39
capital offence, to convert a Protestant to the Catholic faith. The
legislation devised for the Irish Catholics in that evil time was
described by Burke as " a machine as well fitted for the oppression,
impoverishment, and degradation of a people, and the debasement
in them of human nature itself, as ever proceeded from the per-
verted ingenuity of man".
The legislation against Irish industries had its origin in the
narrow and selfish spirit of commercial monopoly in England
which had devised the Navigation Acts against the carrying trade
of the Dutch, and was displayed by her in commercial dealings with
her "plantations" and colonies in the seventeenth and eighteenth
centuries. Irish manufactures and trade were openly suppressed
and extirpated. In the reign of Charles the Second, Irish land
was chiefly used for pasture, and Irish wealth was derived from the
export of cattle, meat, butter and cheese to western English ports.
The English landowners complained, and laws of 1665 and 1680
prohibited the importation of all this Irish produce into England.
Her trade with the colonies was ruined by legislation which forbade
exports thither save in English ships, or imports thence except
with first unlading in English harbours. When the Irish land-
owners were prevented from exporting their cattle to England,
they raised large flocks of sheep and began a manufacture in wool.
English jealousy was again aroused, and in 1699 Irish woollens
were excluded from the English and all foreign markets. Thou-
sands of workmen left Ulster for America and the Continent, and
the country was once more reduced to penury, when the people
were thrown for sustenance entirely upon the land. The linens
of Ireland, and some manufactures in cotton, were also shut out
from the English markets by heavy duties. The trade in beer
and malt was heavily taxed, and, under George the Second, severe
restrictions were laid on Irish manufactures in glass, paper, velvet,
hats, and other articles. The breaking up of land from pasture
into arable was restricted by legislation, and disastrous famines
arose from time to time in the failure to grow sufficient corn.
The political position of the country was that, under the laws
procured by Lord-deputy Poynings in 1495, the Irish parliament
was subject to the privy-council in England, and, by later legis-
lation, to the British parliament at Westminster. By the middle
of the eighteenth century much relaxation had arisen in applying
4O OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
the laws against religion, but the faith of the great majority ot the
Irish people was illegal, and there was no repeal of the persecuting
statutes. In the early part of George the Third's reign, the Irish
parliament began to show some signs of an independent spirit.
In 1768 the Commons rejected a money bill "because it did not
take its rise in that House", and parliaments in Ireland became
octennial, instead of the Commons being chosen for the duration
of each reign. Henry Grattan succeeded Flood as the advocate
of legislative independence, and England's difficulty of war with
her American colonies and with European powers gave Ireland
her opportunity. In 1778, the British parliament, on Irish de-
mands, gave some relief to Irish trade, and changes were made
in the penal code against the Catholics. They could now hold
their property on the same terms as Protestants, and in 1782 they
were enabled to acquire freeholds for lives or by inheritance, to
open schools, and to educate their youth in literature and religion.
In 1779 the British government, in dread of invasion, had
desired to raise a Protestant militia in Ireland, but there were no
funds for their payment, and volunteer corps arose, for part of
whom the ruling powers provided arms. Eighty thousand men,
all Protestants, were soon enrolled, the Catholics being permitted
only to subscribe towards the expenses. It was this volunteer
movement which led to the brief legislative independence of Ire-
land that existed from 1782 till 1800. Early in the former year
the famous Convention of Dungannon was held. This was a
meeting of the Protestant leaders of the Ulster volunteers, and
after long debate they passed a resolution that " The claim of any
body of men, other than the King, Lords, and Commons of Ire-
land, to make laws to bind that kingdom is unconstitutional,
illegal, and a grievance". A second resolution was that " We
hold the right of private judgment in matters of religion to be
equally sacred in others as in ourselves. We rejoice in the re-
laxation of the penal laws against our Roman Catholic fellow-
subjects, and we conceive this measure to be fraught with the
happiest consequences to the union and prosperity of the inhabit-
ants of Ireland". The men who passed these resolutions had
arms in their hands, and were not to be trifled with. In April,
1782, the Irish parliament carried a Declaration of Rights, de-
manding legislative independence, and Great Britain was forced
IRELAND DURING EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 41
to come to terms. The legislative and judicial authority of the
British parliament was renounced: the right of the privy-council
to alter bills transmitted from Ireland was abandoned, and Ireland,
for eighteen years, had an independent legislature, and occupied
a constitutional position like that of Scotland before the Union
of 1707.
This Irish Parliament was, however, from the first a fore-
doomed failure. Not merely was it purely Protestant, while
four-fifths of the Irish people were Catholics, but it did not
properly represent even the Protestant minority. Of the 300
members of this Irish House of Commons only 72 were really
returned by the Protestant voters, while 123 sat for nomination
boroughs, and represented only their patrons. Fifty-three peers
directly appointed these "legislators", and could also ensure, by
their influence, the election of ten others. Fifty commoners also
nominated ninety-one members, and controlled the election of four
others. As a representative assembly it was, therefore, a farce
more ridiculous even than the British House of Commons prior
to 1832. It was, in other ways, a grossly corrupt body, and the
government in England influenced its debates and votes by whole-
sale and unblushing bribery. The changes needed, in order to
turn it into a really representative and useful body, were a
thorough franchise reform and Catholic emancipation. For these
changes, in those days, it was hopeless to strive, and the last state
of the Irish parliament was worse than the first. Pitt, an en-
lightened statesman placed in a very difficult position between
the promptings of his own judgment and the prejudices of his
chief supporters, including those of a monarch now half insane,
strove to give more freedom to Irish trade. His efforts failed
in both Parliaments, and matters drifted on towards the legis-
lative union of the two countries. In 1793, the Irish Catholics
obtained the right of voting for Protestant members, but they
could not sit in parliament, and George the Third, from scruples
which he supposed to affect his coronation oath, declined to grant
full political emancipation.
The national life of Ireland, deprived of an outlet in Parliament,
sought relief in various forms of secret and open organization. The
" Whiteboys " and other violent men who met in dark places and
wrought corresponding deeds, had long been at work against the
42 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
payment of rent and tithe. As the end of the century drew near,
the revolutionary spirit of France produced its effect in Ireland,
and in July, 1790, the "Society of United Irishmen", organized by
Wolfe Tone and Hamilton Rowan, was formed at Belfast. This
body included men of both religions, and proclaimed " an identity
of interests and a communion of rights" for all Irishmen. The
successes of the French republicans so far alarmed the British
government that, in 1793, the Irish Catholics, besides receiving the
electoral franchise, were allowed to become barristers, attorneys,
freemen of corporations, grand jurors, and magistrates, and to attain
the rank of colonel in the army. The country was in a welter of
confusion and trouble. The intelligent and leading Catholics
were conciliated by the policy of concession, but bigots on both
sides had formed hostile associations, and in 1795 open war was
being waged in pitched battle between the Catholic " Defenders"
and the Protestant " Peep-of-day Boys" of Ulster. Then came
the formation of " Orange" lodges by the Protestants, in strong
opposition to Catholic claims.
Early in 1795 Lord Fitzwilliam, a distinguished Whig states-
man, an avowed and warm supporter of Catholic emancipation, had
arrived in Dublin as viceroy. Many Catholic petitions were pre-
sented, asking admission to Parliament, and large numbers of
Protestants were in favour of the measure. Then the viceroy,
after a reply expressing his sympathy with the Catholics, was
suddenly recalled, and this step has been held to have greatly
conduced to the subsequent rebellion. The "United Irishmen",
largely composed of Presbyterians, now became a secret society,
and adopted republican views, aiming at revolution, and separation
from Great Britain, instead of merely the reforms which they had
vainly striven to obtain. An alliance with France was sought, and
the Directory sent an armament, under their famous young general,
Lazare Hoche, in 1796. The hostile fleet was dispersed by a
storm, and the enterprise was abandoned. Excessive punishment
followed this failure in Irish rebellion. The Catholics in Ulster
had already been driven by thousands from their homes, and
Lord Gosford, the governor of Armagh, declared that "neither
age nor sex, nor even acknowledged innocence of any misconduct,
is sufficient to excite mercy, much less to afford protection. The
only crime with which the objects of this ruthless persecution are
IRELAND DURIN7G EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 43
charged is simply a profession of the Roman Catholic religion".
Before the attempted French invasion, the Irish parliament had
passed two Coercion Acts, giving large powers of arrest to magis-
trates on mere suspicion. The Habeas Corpus Act was sus-
pended; martial law was proclaimed; and the country was placed
in a state of siege. After the failure of Hoche's expedition the
Irish Catholics were delivered over to the tender mercies of the
" Orange " yeomanry and of militia regiments from England.
The grossest outrages were rife, including methods of torture
called "half-hanging", "pitch-capping", and "picketing". "Half-
hanging" consisted in stringing up the victim, cutting him down,
and allowing him to struggle back to life again. " Pitch-capping"
meant the pouring of hot pitch on the head, allowing it to cool,
and then roughly tearing off the "cap" thus formed, bringing with
it the hair and portions of the scalp. The fearful device of
"picketing" placed the bare soles of the tortured man on pegs
driven into the ground, with their pointed ends uppermost. His
whole weight was thus supported on a most sensitive part, and
exquisite pain was caused. The gallant Scottish soldier, Sir
Ralph Abercrombie, was appointed to the command of the army
in Ireland in December, 1796, and in one of his letters he
declares that "here (in Ireland) every crime, every cruelty that
could be committed by Cossacks or Calmucks has been committed
by the troops". He issued a general order, severely rebuking
the " licentiousness which must render the troops formidable to
every one but the enemy", and he stoutly refused to withdraw
this order at the request of the viceroy, Lord Camden. Within
four months he resigned his command to General Lake, being
unable to check excesses, and resolved not to play the part of
an executioner.
The Irish Catholics were goaded by these horrors into pre-
mature and unsuccessful revolt. In March, 1798, Lord Edward
Fitzgerald, one of their leaders, died of wounds received in his
desperate resistance to arrest in Dublin. In May, detached
risings took place, chiefly in the counties of Wexford and Wick-
low, and the rebels at first gained some successes over the troops.
Enniscorthy and Wexford were taken, and cruel massacres of
Protestants occurred. After repulse from New Ross and Arklow,
the insurgents were finally and decisively defeated by General
44 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Lake at Vinegar Hill, near Enniscorthy, on June 2ist. This
event was followed by an exciting episode, not very creditable
to the rulers of Ireland and their instruments. In August
three frigates, under English colours, dropped anchor in Killala
Bay, county Mayo. About eleven hundred Frenchmen, with two
guns, under General Humbert, landed. Killala and Ballina were
taken, and the invaders were joined by some fourteen hundred
Irishmen. With this small force Humbert advanced on Castlebar,
which was held by about four thousand yeomanry and militia, in
the bad state of discipline denounced, as we have seen, by Aber-
crombie. Humbert showed much skill, took the British in flank
and drove them away in disgraceful rout, which amply fulfilled
Abercrombie's prophecy as to the probable value of lawless troops
in action. General Lake was in command, and he left behind
him all the artillery, ammunition, and small arms. The fleeing
troops scarcely halted until they reached Athlone, eighty miles
from the field. They there encountered the viceroy, Lord Corn-
wallis, and so ended what the Irish called "the Races of Castle-
bar". A brave resistance was made at Castlebar, when the
French occupied the town, only by a small body of Highlanders,
who scorned to flee rather than fight. The Irish Republic was
proclaimed by the French victors and their friends; but there
could, of course, be no hope of ultimate success against the large
British forces in Ireland. On leaving Castlebar for Sligo, Hum-
bert found his march followed or watched by bodies of men, with
Lake, General Moore (afterwards Sir John, the hero of Corunna),
and Cornwallis in command. He defeated, in a fierce battle,
the Limerick militia who faced him forty miles north-east of
Castlebar, but was at last surrounded by an overwhelming force,
and, after a resistance made for honour's sake, the French general
was driven to lay down his arms — less than nine hundred French-
men thus becoming prisoners to above thirty thousand foes on
or near the scene.
The suppression of the rebellion of 1798 was followed by
severities so brutal that the viceroy, Lord Cornwallis, wrote :
" There is no law either in town or country but martial law.
Numberless murders are committed by our people without any
process or examination whatever"; and again, in April, 1799, when
all danger of further outbreaks had long ceased, Cornwallis
IRELAND DURING EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 45
denounced the system of free quarters for the troops, " which
comprehended universal rape and robbery throughout the whole
country". Later still, he declared that the "violence of our loyal
friends " (the Orangemen) was such as would, if not checked with
the strictest hand, become "a. more violent and intolerable tyranny
than that of Robespierre ".
In this terrible condition of affairs it appeared to Pitt that a
legislative union of the two countries was the one policy which
afforded a prospect of restored and lasting peace. This policy he
adopted, with the full intention of granting therewith full political
rights to the Catholics of both Ireland and Great Britain by ad-
mitting them to seats in the legislature, and removing all disabilities
which now placed them in a position inferior to that of their
Protestant fellow-subjects. His beneficent intentions in this respect
were frustrated by the obstinate refusal of the king, and the measure
was thus deprived of that quality which would have commended it
with great force to the feelings of the Irish Catholics who formed
the bulk of the nation. The immorality of the inevitable means
employed in Ireland in order to effect the Union has been denounced
by some of its strongest supporters as an existing fact, men who
stoutly oppose its repeal. The Irish Orangeman and Unionist,
Mr. Lecky, declares "the Union, as it was carried", to be "a crime
of the deepest turpitude — a crime which, by imposing, with every
circumstance of infamy, a new form of government on a reluctant
and protesting nation, has vitiated the whole course of Irish
opinion". What is certain is, that Castlereagh, the Chief Secretary
chosen by Pitt to carry out the work, spent over a million sterling
in buying out the owners of " rotten " or " nominee " boroughs
which were disfranchised under the Act. In spite of the destruction
of a large part of the correspondence, the clearest evidence exists
of military intimidation, of the bribery of the Irish press and the
Irish bar, and of the forcible suppression of public meetings called
to protest against the measure. The bill was at last carried through
the Irish parliament, and on the first day of the nineteenth century
the Act came into force. One hundred Irish members now sat in
the House of Commons, and the Irish peerage was represented by
four bishops, and by twenty-eight lay peers, chosen for life. Irish
trade was admitted to a free career, with undoubted benefit to the
country, and her share of contribution to the imperial revenue was
46 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
placed at two-fifteenths, far below the proportion due to population,
and reckoned in accordance with her degree of national resources.
Thus came into political existence " The United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Ireland", and the addition of the diagonal cross of St.
Patrick, red on a white ground, completed the union flag in its
existing form.
CHAPTER VI.
RELIGIOUS AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.
Prevalence of Deism in the reigns of George I. and II. — Assailants and defenders of the
Christian faith — Corruption among the clergy of the Church of England — Ignorance
and brutality of the lower classes — Rise of Methodism — The Wesleys and White-
field — Labours of General James Oglethorpe and John Howard — Prison reform —
Hospitals founded — Hannah More, Robert Raikes, Thomas Clarkson, and William
Wilberforce — Granville Sharp and slavery — Rise of the Evangelical party in the
Church of England — William Romaine, John Newton, and Charles Simeon.
Towards the middle of the eighteenth century, an outbreak of
Puritanism within the Church did great service to the cause of
religion and morality among the masses, and ended in the estab-
lishment of a great body of orthodox or evangelical dissenters.
The social condition of both the upper and the lower classes,
in the reigns of George the First and George the Second, was
such as loudly to call for the efforts of earnest men towards
a beneficial change. Christian belief was at a very low ebb in
polite society, where opinions had been long tending towards
mere Deism. A Deist is understood to be one whose belief in
the existence and providence of God is based simply on evidence
and reason. He denies all "revelation" or "supernatural religion",
and is also known as a " Freethinker".
During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries a school of
English writers appeared advocating such views. The Scriptures
were subjected to hostile criticism; the miracles and the main
doctrines of the Christian faith were rejected, and some even
denied the immortality of the soul. These writers were rather
sharp-witted than learned, accurate, or profound, but for a long
period they exercised a strong influence on a society devoid of
earnestness or enthusiasm on all subjects save self-interest and
personal enjoyment. Lord Herbert of Cherbury, soldier, statesman,
RELIGIOUS AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 47
philosopher, and poet, the friend of the Constable Montmorency
and of Isaac Casaubon, and the comrade-in-arms of Maurice of
Nassau, has been called the " Father of Deism ", from the work,
published in 1645, in which he advocated the belief in a supreme
God; in virtue and purity as the worship due to Him; in repent-
ance for sins; and in a future state of rewards and punishments.
He was succeeded by Matthew Tindal, who published in 1730 his
Christianity as Old as the Creation, maintaining that there has
been no special revelation, and advocating "natural" religion; by
John Toland and Woolston; by the third Earl of Shaftesbury,
whose Characteristics was published in 1711; by Anthony Collins,
whose Discourse on Freethinking appeared in 1713; by Lord
Bolingbroke, and others of the same anti-Christian class.
A blight came over the Church soon after the close of Queen
o X>
Anne's reign. Zeal was greatly cooled, doctrine was somewhat
lax, and devotion to episcopal and parochial duty was deplorably
deficient during the period that came between the Hanoverian
succession and the French Revolution. The assailants of Chris-
tianity were, indeed, ably met in controversial writing by one of the
greatest of English divines, Joseph Butler, bishop of Bristol, and
then of Durham, whose Analogy was published in 1736; and by
William Law, who answered Tindal's book in 1732, after publishing
in 1729 the famous Serious Call to a Devout and Holy Life, which
first aroused religious convictions in Dr. Johnson, wrought deeply
and strongly upon the Wesley brothers and their work, and
received hearty praise for its sincerity and power from one whose
single eulogy could confer lasting renown, Edward Gibbon, the
foe of Law's religion, the author of the Decline and Fall of the
Roman Empire. The Church hierarchy and lower ministers were,
however, lacking in that life-example of sincerity and zeal which
must always influence both belief and practice in lay society more
strongly than bare argument, or dialectical skill, or rhetorical appeal.
The English prelates and higher clergy, under George the Second,
would often stoop to court, in hope of still better preferment, the
king's coarse-mannered female favourites. The levees of the
prime minister were more familiar with episcopal faces and garb
than the scenes of labour which called for oversight and care. We
hear of a Welsh bishop who dwelt amid the hills and dales of
Westmoreland, and admitted without shame that he had only once
48 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
visited his diocese. The literature of the day informs us that the
best-known, the permanent, resident in many country parishes was
the ill-paid curate. The incumbent, rector or vicar, under the
evil system which at that time prevailed in the National Church,
was a wealthy pluralist, who held and enjoyed the incomes of
several benefices, and passed his life in a centre of learning, as
at Cambridge or at Oxford or some other cathedral-town, or amid
the fashionable throng of London, Bath, and other resorts of the
polite world. A large part of the clergy showed, in their daily
lives, unbecoming, if not vicious, tastes and habits. The pages of
Fielding and Smollett, with all due allowance for satire and exag-
geration, cannot be wholly false in their delineation of hard-drinking,
gambling priests. The country parson would be often more devoted
to his stable, his kennel, and the sports of the field and the race-
ground than to his duties inside the church fabric or the abodes
of penury and disease. The contemporary denunciations of respec-
table men of their own order; the admissions of clerical sinners
themselves, in correspondence published in later days; the testi-
mony of men like Arthur Young, and Cowper, and Crabbe, leave
no room for doubt as to the character of too many of the Georgian
clergy in the last century. When they did address their flocks
from the pulpit nothing could be, as a rule, more meagre than the
matter, more dull, insipid, monotonous, and unaffecting than the
delivery of their discourses. As the great actor, Garrick, said,
" You clergymen, in the pulpit, deal with the real as if it were
fictitious; we players, on the stage, treat the fictitious as the
real ". The clergyman of that day who wished to stand well with
the fashionable world was bound to avoid the least approach to
excitement or -enthusiasm in matters connected with his sacred
profession. He would be guilty of that worst of sins, " bad taste ";
he would be playing the part of a Puritan or " canting dissenter ".
The religion and morals of the upper and the lower orders were
consonant with the apathy, neglect, and bad example rife among
those who were charged with the work of maintaining a high
standard of faith and practice. In the fashionable world, the men,
and many of the women, were Deists at the best. Their lives were
stained by gross vice. Drunkenness, gambling, sexual profligacy,
gluttony, were rampant; many a promising young life was cut
short by the sword or bullet of the duellist. Virtue and religion
RELIGIOUS AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 49
were found chiefly in the middle and lower middle classes. The
lower mass of the people were sunk in a condition of gross ignor-
ance, brutality, and vice. Fielding remarks on their insolence and
rudeness of language and demeanour, in the streets and on the
river, in London, towards those guilty of the crime of being better-
garbed than themselves, by virtue of their superior means or
station. A French writer notes the " insolent rabble " of porters,
sailors, chairmen (the carriers of sedan-chairs), and day-labourers
as worthy only of " a country without law or police ". A large
portion of the lower class, especially in the towns, almost wholly
neglected by the clergy, and cared for only by some of the Baptists
and other dissenting bodies, were mere heathens as to religious
knowledge and belief, and little better than the brutes in their lives,
sodden with the newly-devised drink, gin, and devoted in their
hours of ease to dog-fighting, cock-fighting, bear-baiting, and other
coarse and cruel recreations.
The University of Oxford enjoys the distinction, little valued
by her scions in that age, of sending forth the men who were to
work with immense and enduring regenerative effect upon this
festering immorality and irreligion. John Wesley, son of the rector
of Epworth, in the Isle of Axholme, Lincolnshire, after education
at Charterhouse School and at Christ Church, became a fellow and
classical lecturer of Lincoln College, Oxford, in 1726, and took
priest's orders in the Church two years later. He and some other
young men, including Wesley's younger brother, Charles, with
James Hervey, George Whitefield, a poor scholar of Pembroke
College, and William Law, formed the habit of meeting in each
other's rooms for prayer, religious converse, and mutual help in
efforts towards a life of serious thought and of good works. They
taught poor children in the town, visited the sick and the prisoners
in the jail, and led strict and holy lives. Such conduct did not
fail to draw attention from the idle and profligate society which
was then largely found at the universities. A student of Christ
Church, sneering at their strict observance of the rules of religion
and at the regularity of their lives, dubbed them " Methodists".
Hostile wit also styled them "The Holy Club", and " Sacramen-
tarians", and " Bible Moths", but the young enthusiasts were not
made of moral stuff to be moulded by the force of ridicule.
Whitefield, Hervey, and Law also took orders in the Church,
VOL. I.
50 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
where their enthusiasm found no encouragement, save in the
recognition, most honourable to himself at that time, accorded to
Whitefield by Dr. Benson, bishop of Gloucester. That true-
hearted prelate, when a complaint was made to him that White-
field's first sermon at Gloucester had driven several people mad,
coolly expressed a hope that the "madness" would not be for-
gotten before the next Sunday.
After voyages made to Georgia, in North America, to preach
the gospel to the colonists and to the heathen Indians, the Wesleys
and Whitefield began to address the " common people " in England
in the open air, or in barns, or in dissenting chapels, or where-
soever men and women would gather to hear them. This initial
work was undertaken in the spring of 1739, and was continued
with ardour and industry, amidst the railing or the contempt of
the clergy of the Established Church, and the persecution, in word
and act, of mobs who, aroused against the preachers, sometimes
pelted them with mud and stones. The light literature of England,
for forty years, abounds in sneers and slanders aimed at the leaders
of, and converts to, the new religious movement. They were
denounced as fanatics or as hypocrites, and some of the number,
as in all such phases of religious excitement and revival, were open
to such reproach, but the work went on, conquering and to conquer,
until the dormant Church was herself stirred into new life and
shamed into rivalry. A moral and religious revolution was pro-
duced which had a great effect in the maintenance of law and order
when the wild passions of mankind, along with legitimate desires
for conservative reform, were aroused or encouraged by the great
political outbreak beyond the Channel.
The labours of John Wresley as an itinerant preacher were
incessant. He had no permanent residence, and never allowed
bad weather or rough roads to stay his journeys of from forty to
sixty miles a day on horseback. He read or wrote as he travelled,
and often preached four or five times in the space of a single
day. Wesley's eloquence was enforced by a dignified manner, a
harmonious voice, and a thorough persuasion of the truth and
importance of that which he uttered, and, in his perorations, he
pointed and drove home his appeals by the use of the Scriptural
"thou" and "thee", as though he addressed a single soul, so that
each hearer to whom his words were applicable was thrilled as by
RELIGIOUS AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 51
a. personal exhortation to repent. The effect of Whitefield's
preaching is beyond rivalry in modern days. His voice was so
resonant, that the words clearly reached the ears of thirty thousand
people gathered in the open air. The tones were as musical and
charming as they were far-reaching, and his utterance was rein-
forced by vehement action, startling apostrophes, and thrilling
appeals of marvellous impetuosity and power. When he addressed
a large gathering of coal miners at Kingswood, near Bristol, the
rude hearers were at first awed into deep silence, and he has
described the feelings which almost overcame himself when, with
the open firmament above him, amid the fields where thousands
were gathered, some in coaches, some on horseback, and some in
the trees, he saw " the white gutters made by the tears which fell
down the black cheeks of the men just come out of their coal pits".
These two great evangelists widely differed in some points of
character and ability. Whitefield rested on his work of rousing
sinners by his burning eloquence, without thought of founding
a systematic and permanent body of successors to his personal
effort. His followers were found in all parts of the land, but
they were not organized by him, though some regard him as the
founder of " Calvinistic Methodism". On one occasion White-
field gave help at a religious revival in Scotland, when the lowest
of the people of Glasgow went forth to Cambuslang, and the
English Methodist saw thirty thousand persons from all parts
around gathered to attend his preaching. Scenes of extraordinary
bodily excitement were there beheld, as at many of the English
meetings — shrieks, fainting fits, convulsions. The ministers of the
Scottish Church held various views as to the value of these mani-
festations, but the general abiding effect was the diffusion of a
more earnest religious feeling throughout Great Britain. John
Wesley, at an early period, separated himself, without any personal
quarrel, from his eloquent friend and colleague. Wesley did not
approve Whitefield's plan of permitting every converted man, how-
ever unfitted he might be in knowledge or in training, to become a
preacher, and, when he was practically ejected from the Church,
he set himself to the work of organizing his followers into a per-
manent religious body.
It must not be forgotten that Wesley never formally renounced
his connection with the Church, and that he was strongly attached
52 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
to Episcopacy, but he and other ordained ministers of the Estab-
lishment found themselves excluded from her pulpits, and were
fain to work outside. He did not desire to adopt the name of
"Methodist", which has adhered (like the word "Christian", itself
at first a hostile designation) not only to the body which he
founded, but to most, if not to all, the ramifications of this great
undesigned schism. Our most brilliant historian describes John
Wesley as "a man whose eloquence and logical acuteness might
have made him eminent in literature, whose genius for govern-
ment was not inferior to that of Richelieu, and who, whatever
his errors may have been, devoted all his powers, in defiance
of obloquy and derision, to what he sincerely considered as the
highest good of his species". Such were the high qualities dis-
played by the founder of Methodism. The first conference of the
new religious body was held in 1744, and was composed of six
clergymen, who considered the topics "What to teach; How to
teach; and What to do". Secession from the Church was then
disavowed, but five years later the movement took an organic and
definite form, with its own ministers, lay preachers, leaders, trustees,
and stewards. The empire was divided into circuits for the
labours of about seventy ministers, and from this date till John
Wesley's death, in 1791, Methodism was becoming divergent from,
and at last entirely independent of the Anglican Church. Many
excellent hymns were written for the use of the worshippers in
"Wesleyan" or Methodist chapels by Charles Wesley and others,
and the various "societies" had, at the above date, spread over the
United Kingdom, the West Indies, and the United States, and
were composed of about 80,000 members. This number has grown
to many millions in various parts of the world, formed into several
distinct Methodist bodies. The original organization, comprising
the Wesleyan Methodists of the United Kingdom, is governed by
an annual Conference, now partly made up of laymen, invested with
supreme legislative and judicial power, and headed by a president
and secretary chosen for one year.
The revival of religion wrought by Wesley and his com-
peers was coincident with much new philanthropic work on be-
half of the most miserable and degraded classes of society.
General James Oglethorpe, who had fought on the Continent
under Prince Eugene, and had afterwards entered the House
RELIGIOUS AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 53
of Commons, where he sat for more than thirty years, is the
man whose "strong benevolence of soul" was sung by Pope.
This good man was chairman of the select committee of the
Commons which examined into and reported on the terrible
cruelty and oppression prevailing in the three London prisons
for debtors — the Fleet, the King's Bench, and the Marshal-
sea. It was mainly due to his exertions that the misdeeds of
the wardens of the Fleet, and of the keeper of the Marshalsea,
were brought to light. The unhappy debtors were subject to
fraud, extortion, filth, starvation, disease, and to torture wrought
by heavy fetters, thumb-screws, and iron skull-caps. The gifts of
the charitable, to provide food for the prisoners, were often stolen
by the wicked men in charge. A wretch named Bambridge, co-
warden of the Fleet, was deprived of his office by an Act, and
many of the abuses were remedied. The colony of Georgia, in
North America, was projected, and founded in 1733 by Oglethorpe,
as a place of refuge where debtors lying in English prisons might
make a new start in life.
It is for beneficent action in regard to prisons that John
Howard is renowned. As a young man of large fortune, he was
making a voyage to Lisbon in 1756, in order to view the effects
of the great earthquake, when he was taken prisoner by a French
privateer. That which he saw and suffered in a French dungeon
at Brest drew his attention to the treatment of prisoners in British,
Irish, and Continental jails. In 1773 he became high-sheriff of
Bedfordshire, and he then used his position for practical ends in
behalf of prisoners. After a series of tours of investigation, he
brought some of the results of his inquiries before Parliament,
and two Acts were passed, one for the payment of fixed salaries
to jailers, who were thereby debarred from detaining untried, or
even acquitted, prisoners for non-payment of arbitrary fees; the
other for the enforcement of cleanliness in jails, with the object
of staying the outbreaks of the fever which still, when it was
brought by " lean and yellow culprits", as in Stuart days, from
their cells to the dock, " sometimes avenged them signally on
bench, bar, and jury". His important work, The State of Prisons,
was published in 1777, and his long labours led, directly or in-
directly, to the provision of healthy cells, the separation of the
sexes, and the division of debtors from felons. The attention
54 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
which Howard also gave to the condition of hospitals led him to
efforts for the prevention of the plague, during which new toils he
perished from typhus fever at Kherson, in South Russia, in 1790.
St. George's Hospital, London, followed in 1733 the founding of
the noble institution, Guy's Hospital, in 1725; the London and the
Middlesex Hospitals arose in 1740 and 1745, and the Small Pox
Hospital in 1746.
Jonas Han way, a kindly and eccentric merchant, traveller,
and navy commissioner, was mainly instrumental in founding
the Magdalen Asylum for unhappy women, and the excellent
Marine Society for taking distressed boys off the streets, and
training them for service on merchant ships or men-of-war. A
good example of effort to promote education among the agri-
cultural class was given by Hannah More, the friend of Johnson,
Reynolds, and Burke, at her dwelling on Cowslip Green, near
Bristol. One of the best of English philanthropists and patriots,
Robert Raikes, proprietor of the Gloucester Journal, founded
Sunday-schools about 1781. He gathered from the streets of his
native city parties of degraded boys and girls, children of drunken
and neglectful parents, who had left them to become revolting, in
sight and sound, to the people passing to public worship on Sunday.
Some women were paid to teach these waifs and strays to read,
and then to go to church with cleanly persons. Self-respect
followed the growth of knowledge and decency, and outcasts
became honest and useful citizens. Thus began the great and
good work which has, in a later age, placed millions of children in
the Sunday-schools of Great Britain.
Towards the end of the eighteenth century, some men devoted
to good works, began the efforts which, early in the nineteenth,
were to produce the abolition of the British trade in slaves. The
names of Thomas Clarkson, of Zachary Macaulay, the father of
the historian, and of William Wilberforce, will be found also in
connection with later toils undertaken for the completion of human
freedom within the limits of the empire. To Granville Sharp, a
scholar and writer of repute, who at one time held a civil post in
the Ordnance Office, belongs the glory of obtaining, at great cost
of money and exertion, a famous legal decision concerning slaves.
It was he who, in effect, "freed the soil of his native land from
the taint and the possibility of slavery" : he established the pro-
RELIGIOUS AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 55
position that "slaves cannot live in England". Sharp asserted,
before the lord mayor, in 1765, the freedom of a maimed negro
slave, named Jonathan Strong, who was seized in the city of
London by his former master, Mr. David Lisle, a Barbadoes
lawyer, who had turned out the man into the streets as useless,
after reducing him to that condition by brutal treatment. The
lord-mayor discharged the negro from custody, and Lisle then
began legal proceedings against Sharp, relying upon opinions
stated to have been given in 1729 by the attorney-general and the
solicitor-general, to the effect that a slave did not gain his freedom
by the fact of coming from the West Indies to Great Britain or
Ireland. This opinion was said to have been supported by Lord
Chief- justice Mansfield. Sharp then spent nearly two years in the
study of the laws which concerned liberty of person for British
citizens, and wrote, for private circulation amongst lawyers, a
pamphlet on the subject, which seems to have deterred Lisle from
proceeding with his action.
In 1770 the great case of James Somerset arose. This slave,
brought to England by his master, Charles Stewart, in 1769, had
left his service. He was then seized in London, and taken on
board a vessel for conveyance to Jamaica, to be sold there as a
slave. Sharp intervened, and the matter came before Lord
Mansfield and three other judges in February, 1770. Counsel
for Somerset maintained " that no man at this day is or can be
a slave in England". The case was postponed, for the further
consideration of issues so important, and in May the question
again came before the Court, on the broad ground "whether a
slave, by coming into England, becomes free?". On June 22nd,
Lord Mansfield delivered the unanimous judgment of himself and
colleagues that "the power claimed (of seizing and detaining
Somerset) never was in use here, or acknowledged by the law, and
therefore the man must be discharged". Thus was established the
principle, as laid down by the counsel for Somerset, following the
judgment given, " As soon as any slave sets his foot on English
ground, he becomes free". Granville Sharp aided Clarkson in
founding, in 1787, the Association for the Abolition of Negro
Slavery, and was also instrumental in establishing the colony of
Sierra Leone for the reception of freed men.
The influence of the Methodist revival was felt, towards
56 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
the end of the eighteenth century, in the Church of England
which had practically forced the Methodists out of her com-
munion. The " Evangelical party " arose, having its centre
at Cambridge, and including some men of distinguished charac-
ter and position. William Romaine, of Christ Church, Oxford,
who became in 1764 rector of St. Andrew Wardrobe and St.
Ann's, Blackfriars, was a great and shining light among this
energetic party until his death in 1795. John Newton, curate of
Olney, and the friend of the poet Cowper, became rector of St.
Mary Woolnoth, in the city of London, in 1779, and was the
author of some famous hymns, dear to the religious world of Eng-
land. Cecil, Zachary Macaulay, and William Wilberforce were
among the most pious and active members of the Evangelical
school, whose leader was Charles Simeon, a fellow of King's
College, Cambridge, and incumbent of Trinity Church in that town
for more than fifty years. He was one of the chief founders of the
Church Missionary Society, and it was he who induced Henry
Martyn,. of St. John's College, the senior wrangler and first Smith's
prizeman of 1801, to sail for the mission work in the East, where
he was to find, after exhausting toil as a preacher, and as a trans-
lator of the New Testament into some Oriental tongues, the
early grave lamented in some youthful verse from Macaulay's pen.
Simeon collected funds for a society to purchase advowsons in the
Church, and to this day " Simeon's Trustees " present to certain
livings clergymen of the Evangelical party. Simeon and his
followers did not further any corporate reforms within the Church,
or seek to influence it as a national institution. Their aim was to
increase individual piety, and, above all, to create a high standard of
clerical devotion to duty, in connection with the holding of sound
doctrine, in strict accordance with the teaching of the New Testa-
ment and of the primitive church. In this regard much useful
work was achieved.
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EARLY TIMES.
CHAPTER VII.
GROWTH OF INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE PREVIOUS TO THE
EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.
Early industries— The Danes give an impulse to English commerce — Foreign workers
settle in England — Craft- and merchant-guilds organized — Efforts of Edward I. to
establish trade — Edward III. "the father of English commerce" — Manufacture of
cloths — " Staple towns" established — Importance of fairs — Ravages of the Black
Death cause scarcity of labourers and rise of wages — Trading by merchant-adven-
turers— Early "mercantile system" — Discoveries of new lands open new sources of
trade — Trinity House established — Commercial policy of Elizabethan statesmen —
Extinction of trade monopolies — Expansion of trade under James I. and the
Commonwealth— Banking system established— Progress of agriculture— Reclama-
tion of waste lands — Industries and commerce of Scotland.
Looking at the whole course of our history since the Norman
Conquest, we find that the commercial supremacy of Great Britain,
to which she largely owes her foremost position amongst the
nations of the world, is of very recent date. It was not till long
after Stuart times that we took our place as the wealthiest of
existing nations, contributing to the general stock of civilization
triumphs of enterprise in trade and manufactures, and a marvellous
industrial success among the peoples of the world.
Leaving aside for the moment the great primitive occupation,
agriculture, we proceed to a rapid sketch of progress prior to the
eighteenth century, before treating of the advance " by leaps and
bounds" which was witnessed soon after the middle of that momen-
tous time.
In tracing the changes due to the application of foresight and
energy in industrial affairs, we shall see a succession of typical
forms of organization, due to the diverse needs and circumstances
of different ages in history. Britain has in turns been distinguished
among the countries of Europe for the growing of corn, the pro-
duction of wool, and the mining of coal and iron, and these different
phases of industry were brought to pass not merely by her own
wants, but by her commercial dealings and connection with other
lands. Social and industrial economy, in the earlier days of civil-
ized life, are concerned with the needs and subsistence of large
households and of village communities. Thence, in the middle
ages, we pass to the organized industry of towns, and again to
arrangements for trade and labour which have in view, through a
58 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
regular system of mercantile development, the creation and main-
tenance of national wealth and power.
The arts of our early English sires, apart from the tilling of
the soil, showed skill in the making of weapons, wheeled vehicles,
and ships. After their settlement in Britain, and the rise of an
England, with the growth of kingly power, and the adoption of
the Christian faith, we have industries plied by monks and nuns
in their religious houses, as in carpentry and weaving, and in other
forms needful for communities that, with the almost entire absence
of trade, must supply their own wants. By degrees, we come to
hawkers or travelling dealers, and to the rise of rude markets, with
warehouses for the storage of food against the day of sale. Monks
from abroad introduced the art of illumination of manuscripts, the
making of glass, and working in various metals for ornament and
for uses before unknown. The English women began to have
higher skill in weaving, and to embroider vestments for the
service of the church. Under Alfred the Great, ship-building,
which had long declined, was revived for the work of defence
against the Danes. English merchants had begun to appear at
continental marts, and Charles the Great made a sort of commercial
treaty with Offa, King of Mercia. The trade in slaves was carried
on, against the denunciations of the clergy, Bristol being one of
the chief scenes of this traffic in the eleventh century.
The coming of the Danes to England gave an impulse to
commerce, and wrought with abiding effect on the national char-
acter, in reviving the decayed spirit of maritime enterprise. The
Norwegians and Danes, at the time when their race so largely
settled on British soil, were noted for commercial energy and skill.
By way of the Russian rivers and the Caspian or the Black Sea,
an export trade in amber was carried on with Oriental lands, in
exchange for imported gold, spices, jewels, and other products.
The existence, in Swedish museums and private collections, of many
thousands of ancient Arabian coins, from many different towns of
the Caliphate, is an interesting proof of this traffic, which the
Crusades were to divert, in a large measure, to the southern nations
of Europe. Their voyages extended to Iceland and Greenland,
and the former country was quickly colonized by settlers from
Norway. The English now began to trade with the north of
Europe, and towns on tidal and other rivers, as well as on the
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EARLY TIMES. 59
coast, grew with the growth of internal, foreign, and coasting
traffic. The extended use of money removed the inconveniences
of mere barter, and began also to lessen the payment of rents in
kind. Another proof of progress was given in the settlement and
use of units of length, area, distance, capacity, and value, and in the
adoption of some standards of measure and weight. Tolls for
facilities of trade were charged, and laws were aimed at commercial
crime.
After the Norman Conquest, the feudal system of rule dealt
a blow at private enterprise in industry and trade. Authority
interfered with the prices of home products, and traders were
forced to pay exorbitant dues. These disadvantages were com-
pensated by the closer connection established between England and
the Continent, and the Crusades aroused daring and adventurous
spirits, opened new sources of knowledge, and new paths for com-
merce. A revival of trade came with the rise of new foreign cities,
or the progress of ancient towns in Germany, Italy, and Flanders,
and the burghs of Scotland began to develop prosperity arising
from toil and traffic. The industries of England received some
benefit from a large immigration after the Conquest. A body of
Flemings was settled in South Wales by Henry the First, where
they pursued their craft as workers in wool. Merchants from
Normandy appeared in London, and the art of building, with the
substitution of stone for wood, was displayed by foreign masons in
cathedrals, abbeys, castles, and other edifices. Weaving appears
to have become at this time a regular craft, carried on by foreign
artisans, who were not admitted to the municipal privileges of the
freemen in the towns. Trades began to be organized in craft-
guilds, with royal charters to secure their rights.
The extent of trade between Germany and England in the
twelfth and thirteenth centuries appears from the records of the
time which mention British exports of meat and fish, lead and
tin, wool and jet, and fatted cattle, in return for which our mer-
chants received the silver of German mines, with some supplies
of corn in time of need. The Hansa, or Hanseatic League, com-
posed of cities in northern Germany and adjacent states, becomes
of great importance in the trade of this period. Merchants from
Cologne, with special privileges, were settled in London, and the
wars of Edward the Third were supported by money borrowed
60 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
from the wealthy members of that guild. In the thirteenth century,
we find English wool worked up in the looms of Italian towns.
A great export of wine to our shores was made from Gascony
and central France. The monks in England at this time were
large producers of wool on the abbey-lands, and their wealth
enabled them to be free importers of wine and other foreign
luxuries.
Before the close of the thirteenth century, industry and com-
merce had become, in various ways, well arranged for the wants
of the time, according to the ideas then prevalent, which regarded
local, rather than national, prosperity. The merchant-guilds re-
gulated the internal trade of towns, with regard to the sale and
quality of goods, the recovery of debts, and the management of
markets. The craft-guilds, composed of artisans in different kinds
of labour, framed and enforced rules for the direction of their own
particular business, and were the mediaeval form of trades-unions.
The chief aim, however, was the production of good work, not the
raising of the price of labour. The members were not to labour at
night, when poor artificial light might mar the result of toil. Bad
work was punished, and every effort was made to prevent those
who were not members of the craft from producing goods of that
class. Youths were trained in the handicraft controlled by each
of these corporations, and this practice gave rise to the apprentice
system of later days. Financial dealings had been improved in
convenience by the ingenuity of Jews, and we find that letters
of credit were in common use, and that bills of exchange were
known. The keeping of accounts had made advances and had
even been introduced on many estates.
It was Edward the First that began to organize industrial
and commercial transactions upon a national basis. He provided
the machinery by which the whole subsequent development of
British industry and commerce has been directed and controlled.
He organized local powers and interests as parts of one body, con-
nected not only with the head, but with all the other members.
General legislation, applicable to business throughout the land,
superseded local rules, and internal trade was greatly benefited
by the establishment of uniform law, custom, and taxation.
Edward the First appointed regular custom-house officers, and
in seeking sites for new ports, he selected the ground on which
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EARLY TIMES. 6 1
we now see Hull and Great Yarmouth as places to found free
towns. Under his guidance, Parliament provided by legislation
for the security of merchants travelling by land, for the protection
of ships from wreckers, for the recovery of debts, and for the
purity of current coin. Great prosperity existed in the commercial
towns of England at this time, and the arts of working in metal and
stone, painting on glass, and embroidering, were cultivated with
much success.
Edward the Third, who is usually associated in the minds of
modern readers of history only with warfare and ambitious attempts
at continental dominion, has been also called, with some justice,
the father of English commerce. It is likely that in his French
wars he was not moved merely by personal or dynastic ambition,
but was chiefly intent on the increase of national power, and on
the development of national resources. The conquest of France
would have secured peaceful and steady trade between the two
countries, and his friendly relations with Flanders would have
made her a third member of a commercial union likely to be profit-
able to all concerned. It is certain that the victor of Cre9y did
what he could to encourage foreign trade, on principles which
aimed at obtaining a high price for English exports, and rendering
imports cheap to the English consumer. It is certain also that he
caused a development of English textile industry. Married to
Philippa of Hainault, he was regarded with a friendly eye by the
people of the Low Countries, whose artisans were greatly skilled in
weaving, and sent the products of their looms in exchange for the
raw wool shorn from the backs of English sheep. The weavers of
Ghent and Bruges supplied garments to clothe the dwellers in our
damp and chilly clime, and the royal revenue was 'largely derived
from the export-tax on the wool which was sent from English
ports. Our native weavers produced only the coarser woollens,
with some fabrics made of hemp and flax, the chief seats of the
trade then lying in Norfolk and Suffolk. There was also a manu-
facture of cloth in Wiltshire and adjacent parts of the west. The
fine cloths worn by the wealthy were imported from Flanders, in
linen as well as woollen fabrics; silks and velvets came hither from
Italy. By Edward's encouragement many Flemish artisans came
to settle in England, especially at Norwich, then the chief seat of
weaving in wool, with a population of some six thousand persons.
62 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
The export of English wool soon declined, in consequence of the
increase of home manufacture. Edward also confirmed by statute
the institution of "staple towns", where alone, in each district, its
chief product or staple could be sold. Only merchants engaged in that
particular trade could export its special goods. The staple towns for
the chief English commodity, wool, were Newcastle, York, Lincoln,
Norwich, Westminster, Canterbury, Chichester, Winchester, Exe-
ter, and Bristol. The system was extended to the Continent by
the appointment of a particular foreign town for the sale of English
produce. At various times, Antwerp, St. Omer, and Calais, after
its capture in 1347, had this privilege. The "staple" system ren-
dered easier the collection of custom dues, and gave importance to
merchants as a rising class of the community.
Much of the business of that time was transacted, in provincial
towns, at weekly or bi-weekly markets, and at great annual fairs,
which increased facilities of communication have long reduced from
the position of needs to nuisances, and, in most cases, have utterly
abolished. Leeds had a wool fair for the sheep-owners of Lanca-
shire and Yorkshire, and the place was then a great resort of
English and foreign merchants from the ports on the east coast.
On St. Giles' Hill, Winchester, a sixteen-days' fair was yearly held
for the sale of all kinds of goods. Stourbridge Fair, near Cam-
bridge, was one of the most important in the kingdom, lasting for
the whole of September, and visited by the traders from many
parts of the Continent, who disembarked at the then convenient
harbours of Blakeney and Lynn. The merchants of Genoa and
Venice came to this great mart, which was still flourishing in the
days of Queen Elizabeth, with gems and spices, velvets and silks.
Flanders sent thither the fine woollen and linen cloths of Ghent,
Liege, and Bruges. Vintners tasted samples of French and
Spanish wines: ship-builders bargained for the pitch and tar of Nor-
way. Amber and furs for the use of the wealthy were displayed
by merchants of the great Hanseatic League, with copper and iron
for domestic and agricultural purposes, and raw flax and yarn for
the making of linen. The English dealers took to Stourbridge
their great sacks of wool for continental looms, with horses, corn,
and cattle, and barley for the Flemings to brew strong ale. The
tin of Cornwall, and Derbyshire lead, could there be seen, and the
fair was, for a month, a busy town, with its long lines of stalls,
THE HUMOURS OF STOURBRIDGE FAIR IN
THE OLDEN TIMES.
A great part of England's business was transacted, in the olden times,
at large annual fairs. One of these was held at Stourbridge, near Cam-
bridge. It lasted the whole month of September, being visited by traders
from Genoa, Venice, Ghent, Bruges, and the great towns of the Hanseatic
League. Much trafficking was done in gems, spices, cloth, wines, silks, and
other such commodities; while there was also a considerable amount of
fun and merry-making combined with the serious business. It was a
gathering like this which suggested Vanity Fair to the author of The
Pilgrim's Progress.
(3)
W. S. STACEY.
THE HUMOURS OF STOURBRIDGE FAIR IN THE OLDEN TIMES.
Vol. i. p. fe.
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EARLY TIMES. 63
named either from the class of goods exposed for sale, or from the
nationalities whose tongues were heard amidst the din of chaffering
and fun.
Just at the time when the country was greatly prospering in
trade and industry, and the mass of the people, chiefly given to the
work afforded by pasture and tillage, were even then enjoying
higher physical comfort than their fellows in continental countries,
a great economic change was wrought by the fearful plague, which
broke out in 1348, known as the Black Death. It seems certain
from the records that nearly half of the population of England,
which may then have been four millions, was swept away in this
pestilence. Labourers became very scarce; wages rose about fifty
per cent, and legislation strove in vain to find a remedy for the
land-owners. The main results were, a great increase in the number
of petty farmers, the rapid extinction of villeinage or serfage, and
the consequent growth of the class of free labourers on the soil.
The agricultural population were seldom in better case, as regards
sufficient wages to purchase food, than during the fifteenth century,
in spite of wars at home and abroad.
The growth in importance of the trading classes, shown in the
formation of the great City Companies, who lent large sums to
kings, and in the splendid style of living, which enabled William
Canynges of Bristol to give fit entertainment to Edward the Fourth,
was one cause of the trade-transition to modern times, which has
been called the " mercantile system ". Restrictions laid upon the
dealings of foreign merchants in England secured for natives the
home and retail trade. In the fifteenth century, English merchants
began to aim at competition with foreign shipping. No English
vessel, up to that time, entered the Mediterranean, and many of the
products of the East and of southern Europe reached our shores
on board the vessels of the great annual trading squadron from
Venice, which brought them to the ports on the English Channel.
New companies of English "merchant-adventurers" began to be
rivals in the trade of the Hanseatic League, and, under Henry the
Fifth, large ships for trading purposes were built at Southampton,
Bristol, and Hull. Commercial treaties were made with foreign
sovereigns, and near the close of the fifteenth century we find an
Italian appointed English consul at Pisa.
The protection of home manufactures was sought, under
64 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Edward the Fourth, in the absolute prohibition of import for many
classes of finished foreign goods. The " mercantile system " or
"theory" was that of increasing national wealth at the expense
of other countries, in the belief that prosperity consists in posses-
sing much silver and gold, by excluding foreign manufactures, and
admitting only raw material to be worked up here for sale abroad.
This policy, lately abandoned, had some success at the time of its
adoption. In 1463 the English farmers, suffering from imported
foreign corn, were cheered by a law which forbade the introduction
of the produce from abroad until English corn had passed the high
price, at that day, of six shillings and eightpence, or half a mark,
per quarter. In manufactures, the chief thing to be noted at this
time is the great development in the making of cloth, carried
on by capitalists who employed spinners and weavers at their own
cottages in the country or tenements in towns. Industrial villages
began to arise, and there were even some small beginnings of
the modern factory system.
When the boundaries of the world were widened by the mari-
time discoveries of Columbus, Da Gama, Magalhaens, and other
great navigators, near and after the close of the fifteenth century,
the trade of the world was placed upon a new basis. The Medi-
terranean ceased to be the great centre of commerce. The traffic
between East and West was diverted from its paths through Genoa,
Venice, and Alexandria, and the new passage round the Cape of
Good Hope made Portugal, for a time, the chief trading nation, and
Lisbon the great commercial town of western Europe. By slow
steps, the merchants of England began to share in the benefits laid
open to enterprise in the enlarged sphere of commercial dealing.
An epoch had arrived in which our trading class was to enter on
the course which ended in making Great Britain the chief owner
of shipping, and London and Liverpool, with other great ports,
the storehouses for a vast distributing commerce, involving all the
nations of the earth. The physical extension of their bounds
for European peoples, the throwing down, by courage and skill,
of the barriers which had seemed to be impassable for man, placed
the British Isles in the centre of the land-masses of the globe,
and gave to the inhabitants a new geographical relation to the
rest of mankind.
Prior to the new discoveries, Britain had lain almost on the
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EARLY TIMES. 65
north-western edge of the regions known to civilized man; she
was now to become, as the ages rolled away, the very centre, the
beating heart, of the traffic of the world. Our commercial policy
henceforth considered not merely the prosperity of the country
by herself, but her position relative to other nations. Superiority
was now the statesman's aim, and, as time passed on, victorious
repulse of formidable foes gave thoughts of imperial sway to the
prouder and more ambitious spirits of the coming wielders of mari-
time power. In the days of Elizabeth the crisis came. The com-
mercial sceptre, transferred from Bruges to Antwerp at the close of
the fifteenth century, had passed to London before the end of the
sixteenth. Protestant refugees, skilled in the arts of industry and
trade, fled to our shores from the cruelties of the Inquisition and of
Philip the Second's viceroy, Alva, which were desolating the cities of
the Netherlands. Flemish merchants found a home in the English
capital, where Elizabeth's friend and entertainer, the generous and
hospitable Sir Thomas Gresham, had reared, on the model of the
great edifice at Antwerp, the resort of merchants called the Royal
Exchange. The defeat and ruin, by the weapons of man and the
winds of Heaven, of the Spanish Armada, in 1588, gave England a
foremost position among the European nations, as the champion of
the Protestant peoples, and as the victor over the power then held
dominant on land and sea.
From that time forward our future was sure. The navy created
by Henry the Eighth, backed by the adventurous courage and skill
of Drake and Hawkins, Frobisher and Raleigh, shown in their
exploits as privateers and buccaneers, as well as in formal battle
against Spanish foes, made England, for the first time since
Alfred's days, a nation of admitted strength upon the seas.
Under Tudor sovereigns new companies arose for the extension
of trade. The Merchant Adventurers, a society formed in the
days of Henry the Seventh, was followed by the Turkey Com-
pany, for trade with the Levant, by the Russian Company, in
1554, and by the East India Company, in 1600. The interests
of shipping on the British coasts were duly regarded when Henry
the Eighth established the corporation still known as the Trinity
House, a guild whose full style is that of the "Fraternity of the
Holy Trinity at Deptford ". Beacons and sea-marks, ballastage
and buoys, and the general safety of harbours and coasts became,
VOL. I. 5
66 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
under Elizabeth's charter, the special care of the incorporated
Brethren. Bristol at this time acquired a new importance from
the American trade, and the decline of the Hanseatic League
threw the traffic of the Baltic and northern Europe into the hands
of merchants at Boston and Hull.
The Elizabethan age was the time when the mercantile system,
destined to last for more than two centuries, through civil struggles
and the earlier days of colonial expansion, was fully established by
careful legislation. This national regulation of industry and trade
had for its object the increase of national power. The measures
adopted for this end were the accumulation of treasure by means
of manufactures and commerce, the increase of shipping, the gather-
ing of naval stores, the fostering of fisheries as a nursery of trained
and hardy seamen, the establishment of new manufactures, the
protection of English commerce and tillage by navigation laws and
corn laws. A new Poor Law provided for the support of the
helpless and for the punishment of the wilful idler, and the growth
of prosperity secured peace at home, while it prepared the people
to encounter enemies abroad. The results attained were commen-
surate with the efforts made.
Passing over for the present the colonial development of Stuart
times, we may point to the fact that the policy inaugurated by
Elizabethan statesmen enabled Great Britain to outstrip first Por-
tugal, then Spain, next Holland, and lastly France, in the race
for commercial supremacy. When we turn to the manufactures
of the country in the Tudor period, we find a great increase in
the working of wool. London employed some thousands of per-
sons in the making of woollen caps, and many other towns
were engaged in the trade. The worsted trade, with Norwich
for its centre, was extended throughout the eastern counties.
The broadcloths of the west of England now became famous,
and the long stagnant north awoke to new industrial life in the
production of various woollen cloths at Halifax, Manchester, and
York. Artisans from Flanders settled at Sandwich, Colchester,
Maidstone, Lynn, and many other towns, bringing with them im-
provements in cloth-making and dyeing, with linen-weaving, thread-
making, needle-making, cutlery work, clock-making, pottery, the
lace manufacture that arose in Buckinghamshire and adjacent
districts, and the famous lace fabrics then founded at Honiton.
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EARLY TIMES. 67
Before the middle of Elizabeth's reign Norwich had more than
four thousand Dutch and Flemish inhabitants, and the " new
drapery ", as the cloth made by the foreign settlers was called, was
exported very largely to the country from which Spanish cruelty
and folly had expelled them. The extinction of many of the
injurious monopolies in 1601 was a further benefit to trade. Bir-
mingham, a town named in Domesday-book, was now beginning
to be known for hardware in the form of knives, cutting tools of
all kinds, bits, nails, and swords; and Sheffield, famous for its
arrow-heads in the days of Cre9y and Poitiers, had now the rise
of its renown for cutlery in the skill of artisans escaped from the
Low Countries. The tin mines of Cornwall were still at work,
as they had been for so many hundreds of years, and a valuable
copper mine was opened in Cumberland in early Elizabethan days.
The iron trade was confined to Kent, Surrey, and Sussex, and
loud complaints were made that the land was being stripped of its
forests, the wood from which was then the sole material used by
workers in smelting the ore. The rich salt deposits of Worcester-
shire and Cheshire still remained unused, and our forefathers, for
the salting of winter meat and other uses, employed the imports
from the south-west of France, or the salt obtained on our own
coasts by evaporation. The use of brick for building had been
revived, after the disuse of about a thousand years, and the clays
of the eastern counties and of the valley of the Thames furnished
building material for London and the neighbouring districts. The
coal-mining largely practised by the Romans became extinct till
Norman days, and it was not till nearly the middle of the thirteenth
century that Newcastle coal was heard of. In the fifteenth, the
mining of coal had become a source of revenue, but the want of
adequate means to pump water from the pits remained a great
hindrance till the time of steam, and the total output was small
indeed, compared with that which coming ages were to see.
The Stuart age witnessed the commercial triumph of Britain
over the energetic little state whose rise was the chief event in
northern Europe at the close of the sixteenth century. At the union
of the Scottish and English crowns, Holland was the foremost com-
mercial and maritime power. Before the accession of her Orange
Prince to the British throne, the fisheries, the trade, the war-fleets of
this country were at least on a level with those of her sturdy rival.
68 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Blake made Cromwell master of the seas, and only for a short time
after the Restoration was this position imperilled by waste and mis-
rule. In the reign of James the First, English merchants had become
a numerous, wealthy, and powerful class, the chief purchasers of the
title of "baronet" invented by the " statecraft " of that needy king.
Our trade had spread to all the ports of western Europe and the
Mediterranean, of the Baltic and the North Seas. British fishermen
were catching the whales of Greenland and the cod of Newfound-
land. The Navigation Acts of the Commonwealth did much to
destroy the carrying trade of Holland. Before the close of the
seventeenth century, our commerce with the East and West Indies
had vastly grown. The skilled artisans driven to our shores from
France by the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes, in 1685, brought
with them to London and to many other towns improvements in
the weaving of linen and silk, in the making of clocks, glass, paper,
surgical instruments, locks, and other articles of prime utility. These
Huguenot refugees, who founded many famous English families—
the Trenches, Romillys, Martineaus, Boileaus, De Crespignys,
Layards, and Millais — numbered many thousands of souls, and
introduced to the free land of their adoption some millions of capi-
tal, with abundant political, military, and literary skill. The cloth
manufacture of the country grew apace in this age. The counties
of Worcester, Devon, Hereford, Wiltshire, Somerset, and Glouces-
ter in the west; Lancashire, Yorkshire, and Westmoreland, with
its famous " Kendal-green " cloth, in the north; the old seats of
the trade, Suffolk, Norfolk, and Essex in the east, had weaving
industries whose total product, by 1 700, was valued at about seven
millions of pounds. The export trade of Newcastle now brought
a crowd of colliers from the Tyne to the Thames, where their
freights were being used, not only for the workshops, but for house-
hold fires, and people were complaining of the " sea-coal smoke",
which in Victorian days, mingled with fog, has become such a curse
to the citizens of London and all great towns.
Along with this material development of the national resources,
the financial methods and machinery of commerce were improved.
We now have the establishment of a banking system, with the
issue of notes, and this was followed, at the end of the seventeenth
century, by the reform of the coinage and the foundation of the
Bank of England. The same " mercantile system " was continued
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EARLY TIMES. 69
in restrictions on the import of manufactured goods, and on the
exportation of native raw material, such as wool and hides and
fuller's earth. The encouragement of the woollen manufacture was
attempted in an Act of 1666, which enjoined, under heavy penalties,
the burial of bodies wrapped in woollen only, instead of in linen
shrouds, which latter use tended to increase the importation of
foreign goods. The amassment of treasure within the country
had been sought in the past by laws forbidding the export of
bullion, but, under Charles the Second, full liberty was given to
traders to take and send abroad foreign coin and precious metals
in other forms, and the attention of legislators on commercial affairs
was turned to the doctrine of the "balance of trade", which aimed
at preventing imports of foreign merchandise from surpassing in
value the exports of native goods.
The earliest agriculture and pasturing, after the English Con-
quest, was by a partner system under which the oxen of several
men were employed together at the plough, while the cattle
were fed on land held in common, and the same herd tended,
on the grass or amid the woods of oak and beech, the swine
and sheep of divers owners. The arable land was managed on
the three-field system of one portion being under wheat or rye
for a first crop after fallow, another sown with barley or oats, and
the third lying fallow for a year, till its turn came round for rye or
wheat. The monks did much in the draining of fen-lands, and in
improving the art of cultivating the soil.
In Plantagenet times, as villeinage became extinct, the better
sort of serfs were turned into small tenant-farmers, and the poorer
kind were labourers, living mainly on wages for tilling the land held
by others. At this period, with its rude methods of tillage, a corn-
crop of eight bushels, or one quarter to the acre, was reckoned a
very good return. Sheep were largely kept for their wool, and
oxen were used for drawing the plough and wheeled carts, but the
lack of winter food prevented the fatting of much stock for the
table. There were plenty of swine, whose meat was salted for
winter use. Much care was given to improving the breeds of
sheep, for the value of the fleeces, but the finest animals of that
day would be diminutive specimens to modern eyes. The lessening
of the supply of labour through the great plague of the fourteenth
century caused a vast increase of permanent pasture, and in Tudor
70 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
days the inclosures of land for the spread of sheep-farming caused
the rising known as Ket's rebellion.
The dissolution of the monasteries by Henry the Eighth de-
prived the religious bodies, who had been, in general, excellent
and kindly landlords, of all their estates, and their transfer into
the possession of the new class of nobles caused a rise of rents
which ruined many of the poorer tenants, and led to much pauper-
ism. The confiscation of guild-lands by Protector Somerset, under
Edward the Sixth, had a like effect upon the agricultural labourers,
and caused the insurrections of 1549. In the sixteenth century,
the progress made in farming included the use of greater capital,
with better breeds of horses and horned cattle, and wiser
methods of manuring the land. The growth of corn per acre
was doubled, and new objects of tillage were introduced by the
Dutch and Flemish immigrants. The gardens, fields, and or-
chards began to supply wholesome and agreeable food in cherries,
currants, apricots, better kinds of apples, celery, cabbages, carrots,
and other vegetables. The hop-gardens of Kent and Surrey
were seen to bloom in beauty, and beer became a national home-
made beverage, making our Tudor forefathers independent of the
Netherlands and Germany for the foaming ale which then held
the place of coffee, tea, and cocoa at the morning meal. Before
the close of that epoch, England had so far recovered her position
as a corn-growing country, that Bacon, writing in 1592, describes
her as " feeding other countries " instead of being fed by them.
Books upon husbandry began to appear. Sir A. Fitzherbert, in
1534, with a farming experience of forty years, published maxims
for the tillers of his day. Thomas Tusser, in 1573, issued his
famous Five Hundreth Points of Good Husbandry in rhyming verse.
Under the Stuarts, some roots, hitherto confined to the gardens,
were grown in fields as a crop after corn, instead of the land being
left fallow. The great area of fen-lands around the Wash, which
had been useful ground in Roman times, but had relapsed into marsh
at the Norman Conquest, was now taken in hand. In 1634, the
Earl of Bedford spent three years in attempts to reclaim by drain-
ing the- great district afterwards named the Bedford Level: the
work was only completed, by his successor in the title, in 1688, and
in the end about three-quarters of a million of acres became good
pasture-land, or corn-land of the best quality. The scheme em-
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EARLY TIMES. 71
ployed was one devised by an ingenious Dutchman, Vermuiden,
who cut new channels of a spacious size to receive some of the
sluggish waters of the Nene and Welland, Cam and Ouse, and
other streams, and so created a current sufficient to clear the river-
mouths of soil. The same engineer drained Hatfield Chase, in
the south-east of Yorkshire, and relieved the country from the
floodings of the Don.
It is not needful to say much concerning the industries and
commerce of Scotland prior to the Act of Union. The qualities
inherent in the Scottish people were such as all the world now
recognizes, and have mainly contributed to the wonderful advances
made by that country in almost every department of material and
mental civilization. Prior to the eighteenth century, it appears
that trade, manufactures, and tillage were not in a forward state.
The land had been much hampered by civil and religious troubles.
The handicrafts were of a rude and homely kind, the chief manu-
facture being in linen. The fisheries enabled the people to export,
as now, large quantities of salmon and herrings, and Scottish beef,
now of superlative merit, was known to English markets in Stuart
times, by way of peaceful trade, after the cessation of the border
forays conducted by the cattle-lifters of both countries. In 1649 we
find Parliament dealing with the importation of the material made
at Scottish salt-pans, on complaint of the English makers that "their
salt could not keep market " with that produced by their rivals.
The impetus to progress came when the statute which effected the
parliamentary union swept away trade restrictions on the energies
of the Scottish people. The industrial affairs of Ireland have been
already dealt with in her history prior to 1801.
72 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
CHAPTER VIII.
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE DURING THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.
Restrictions on trade disappearing — Adam Smith's teachings on political economy —
Government bounties — Lighthouses and marine assurance companies established —
Story of the first silk mill in England — Woollen and cotton manufactures — Inven-
tions of John Kay, Hargreaves, Arkwright, Lees, and Crompton — Cartwright's
power-loom — Wedgwood's improvements in pottery — James Watt and the steam-
engine — Improvements in the arts of bleaching and calico-printing — The linen,
paper, and glass manufactures — Vast development of the coal and iron trades —
Effects on the distribution of the population — Progress in agriculture — Improve-
ments in breeds of stock — Board of Agriculture and agricultural societies estab-
lished— Improvements in the means of internal communication — Construction of
canals — Building of bridges — The post-office system — Comparative statistics at
close of the century.
Throughout the eighteenth century the principles and practice
of the "mercantile system" were maintained, with the old object of
regulating trade, now in rivalry with France, as a means of increas-
ing national power. It was for this that the cattle-trade and manu-
factures of Ireland — then treated as a merely conquered and foreign
country — were hampered and nearly ruined by hostile restrictions,
and by the policy of exclusion from any share in British profits; it
was for this that the colonies in North America were subjected to
enactments of similar purport, if not of equally crushing force.
As the century advanced, the " landed interest" began to be
overweighted by the growing mercantile and manufacturing classes.
Under Walpole's fiscal rule many beneficial changes were made.
He aimed at freedom for British exports of manufactured goods,
and at ease of import for the raw materials of which they were
made. The export duties on home-made goods were almost swept
away. The duty on raw silk and on about forty other imports was
removed or lightened, and the manufacturing towns and the sea-
ports, Birmingham and Manchester, Liverpool and Bristol, grew
fast in population and wealth. By the middle of the century, the
value of exported goods, which had been about six millions in
1701, had risen to twelve millions. Wise changes in the mode of
collecting the customs deprived the smugglers and other fraudulent
dealers of a great part of the profits which had previously been
so detrimental to the revenue.
The industrial system of Elizabethan days was now about to
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 73
break down under the changes wrought by the use of new machinery
in manufactures. The science of Political Economy, whose prophet
was Adam Smith, now arose to deal with new industrial conditions,
and to establish the principle of "natural liberty" for the workings
of handicrafts and commerce. This great man, born in 1723, of
middle-class parentage, at Kirkcaldy, was educated at the univer-
sities of Glasgow and Oxford, became the close friend of David
Hume, occupied the chair of moral philosophy at Glasgow in 1752,
won wide fame in 1759, by his Theory of Moral Sentiments, and
died, in 1790, lord-rector of his "nursing mother" in the liberal arts,
the seat of learning founded in 1449, under the auspices of Pope
Nicholas the Fifth. It is significant and remarkable that the
renowned Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of
Nations was published in 1776, the year when Watt, another
distinguished Scot, produced the first effective steam-engine.
The new method of dealing with the results of toil was thus
simultaneous with the new machine for making labour easy and
swift, and the two combined were to work a revolution in the
industrial world. Adam Smith was the outcome and the highest
product of a new school of economical thought. John Locke,
William Petty, Joshua Child, and Dudley North, in England;
and the illustrious Turgot, in France, had been striving towards
freedom from "regulated" and restricted trade. The world was
to be now taught that the increase of personal wealth, by allow-
ing to the individual a free use of his particular abilities and
energy, was the sure, straight road to the growth of national
wealth; and that the growth of national wealth must not be sought
in efforts to depress the industries of foreign nations, but in a
system which seeks to work good for each in the benefit of all.
In this we are somewhat anticipating the course of events.
In the earlier part of the century, Parliament sought the good
of the British ship-builders in bounties given for the export, from
the American colonies to England, of masts and spars, turpentine
and hemp, pitch and tar; a trade which would tend to make this
country less dependent on the Swedish monopoly in materials ,
for the construction and outfit of a mercantile marine. Bounties
were also awarded to those who built stout ships of about five
hundred tons burthen or upwards, suitable for arming in self-
defence against hostile cruisers or privateers. The authorities
74 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
of the Trinity House adopted measures to improve the safety
of the coasts. New lighthouses, as that at the Eddystone in
1709, followed by Smeaton's grand stone building in 1755, were
erected at various points. Landmarks, buoys, and floating lights
gave further help to navigators, and many Acts were passed for
the improvement of harbours on the English and Scottish coasts.
Imperfect charts were remedied by more careful and complete
surveys, and a mechanical genius of Yorkshire, John Harrison,
received, in 1767, a reward of twenty thousand pounds from the
government, for the construction, on the principle of the compen-
sating balance, of a chronometer which enabled mariners to deter-
mine, with near approach to accuracy, the longitude of their
vessels at sea. Under George the First, two Assurance Companies,
still flourishing, began the business of securing owners against
losses by sea; and in 1779, Lloyd's system of marine insurance
was fully established among the underwriters who met at the
Coffee-house in the Royal Exchange. The Lloyd's List, or ship
news, had then been published for more than fifty years.
In the development of industries during the earlier half of the
century under review may be noted the extension, after the Union,
of the Scottish linen manufacture, the growth of copper-mining in
Devonshire and Cornwall, and the increased consumption of coal
from Newcastle. The cotton manufacture, dependent on material
obtained from Cyprus and Smyrna, is certainly known as estab-
lished, in some shape, in 1641; it was just becoming a dangerous
rival for the makers of linen when the new machinery came to
effect an enormous change in the manufacturing system. Do-
mestic work was to give place to the labours of the factory or
mill, and the small capitalists were to be swallowed up in the
swelling waves of industrial advance created by new iron-masters,
" cotton-lords", and other producers of goods on a huge and
systematic scale. The makers of articles for wear and other use
had hitherto either worked at home, at looms or forges in or
adjacent to their dwellings, or in small workshops at the abodes
of masters who were often also engaged in tillage. There were,
indeed, factories or "mills" to be seen, where more than a hundred
"hands" were employed, but this was not the usual method. The
work was largely put out by masters to be done by the operatives
at their own homes, and, in place of large towns, shrouded in
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 75
smoke, with people crowded in close narrow streets and courts,
there were countless small industrial villages, where the artisan
and family combined the cultivation of a plot of ground, and the
tending of fowls and pigs, or even of a cow, with the labours of
spinning and weaving, fulling and dyeing, hammering iron and
making tools.
The earliest of the modern English factories or mills was the
establishment for the working of silk, erected at Derby in 1718, by
the brothers John, William, and Thomas Lombe. Here, for the
first time, motive power was supplied from outside for work per-
formed by machinery instead of by human hands. The English
dealers in silk thread had long been undersold by imports smuggled
in from Italy and France. Rumours came that the abnormal
cheapness of the foreign product was due to the use of improved
machinery, driven by other power than that of human muscles.
The youngest of the three brothers, John Lombe, had some know-
ledge of machinery, and he went out to Leghorn in order to strive
to penetrate the secret, which was guarded with the utmost care,
under the severest penalties for disclosure. By the aid of a priest,
who was confessor to the owner of the Italian works, Lombe obtained
employment in the mill, and was allowed, as a poor young man
whose character was vouched for by the priest, to sleep on the
premises. By the help of a dark lantern, instruments, and paper,
drawings were made, in the depth of night, of different parts of
the machinery, and, again by the assistance of the priest, were
sent over to England in bales of silk. The youthful traitor made
his escape, and a large mill, with machines driven by a great water-
wheel, was erected on the banks of the Derwent. One of the
brothers, Sir Thomas Lombe, took out a patent for fourteen years,
and received, on its expiration in 1732, a large sum of money from
the treasury for the service rendered to the nation. Other mills
were soon erected in or near Derby, at Stockport and Congleton
in Cheshire, and at other towns.
Soon after the middle of the century a burst of inventive power
came upon the industrial world of Great Britain. About 1 760 the
"flying-shuttle" was applied to quicken the weaving of woollen
and cotton goods. This invention was due to John Kay, a native
of Bury in Lancashire. At his father's mill in Colchester he first
devised improvements in the reeds for looms, by the use of
76 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
polished blades of metal instead of cane, and then contrived an
arrangement for throwing the shuttle with more rapidity and
greater force, which enabled the weaver to double his daily pro-
duction of cloth. The great names of this inventive period in
British history are those of Hargreaves, Arkwright, Crompton,
Wedgwood, Cartwright, and Watt. James Hargreaves, an illiter-
ate and humble weaver, born about 1720 near Blackburn, in
Lancashire, was also a carpenter who did some work in constructing
a carding-machine for Mr. Robert Peel, the grandfather of the
great statesman. Hargreaves was often at a loss for yarn, which
his wife and children could not spin fast enough to keep his loom
employed. An accident observed by his watchful eye suggested
the invention of the "spinning-jenny", whereby eight threads were
spun at once instead of a single one. A patent was taken out
in 1770, and the number of threads spun at one operation was
greatly increased.
The claims of Richard Arkwright, born at Preston in 1732,
and in 1750 working as a barber at Bolton, have been the subject
of much controversy. The invention of the famous "spinning-
frame" for cotton, in which an arrangement of rollers drew out
the threads to needful fineness, has been ascribed to a friend of
Ark wright's, named Thomas Hayes or Highs. Arkwright, it is
admitted, was at any rate the man who perfected, developed, and
applied the machine. Driven from Preston by the rage of the
spinners against his new process, he met, at Nottingham, Mr.
Jedediah Strutt of Derby, who had greatly helped the rising trade
in hosiery by the application of improvements in the stocking-
loom. In 1771 a large mill, with water-power, was set up by
Strutt and Arkwright at Cromford in Derbyshire, and Arkwright's
skill and energy in organization made him one of the chief founders
of the factory system. In legal contests against those who infringed
his various patents Arkwright was victorious over some of his
opponents, became high-sheriff of Derbyshire, was knighted by
George the Third, and died in 1792, the possessor of a vast for-
tune. The carding-machine, for straightening the fibres of raw
material, before it can be spun into thread, was due to John Lees
of Manchester in 1772, and it was perfected by Arkwright in the
following year.
Samuel Crompton, one of the great benefactors of his kind,
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 77
ranks, so far as pecuniary results for himself were concerned,
among the martyrs of the history of invention. Born near Bol-
ton in 1753, son of a man who laboured, like many others in that
age, both with the loom and with the plough, Crompton set himself
to devise a machine for producing better thread than that of
Hargreaves. In 1779, after five years' labour, he perfected the
famous spinning-mule, which derived its name from the fact of
being a hybrid compound of the inventions of both Hargreaves
and Arkwright. This most ingenious and valuable invention did
the work of the spinning-frame and the spinning-jenny in succes-
sive operations, and gave so mighty an impulse to production
that, in little more than thirty years, nearly five millions of spindles
were being worked by "mules" in the British mills. The hapless
inventor was too poor to obtain a patent, and his lack of worldly
wisdom and self-assertion led to his being cheated of the secret,
for a paltry sum, by a manufacturer at Bolton. The nation was
enriched by many millions of pounds, but the paltry sum of five
thousand was all that could be wrung out of the government,
and this was not obtained till 1812. Crompton failed in the
business started with this modest capital, and died, a poor man,
in 1827.
We come next to the application of inventive power to the
process of weaving, which the machines just described, used
for making yarn, left in its former rude and slow condition.
Edmund Cartwright, born in 1743 at Marnham, in Nottingham-
shire, was educated at Oxford, and in 1779 became the rector
of Goadby Marwood, near Melton Mowbray. It was a visit
to Arkwright's Derbyshire mills that turned the parson's thoughts
towards weaving, and in 1785 he invented, in a rude form, the
power-loom which was to revolutionize the weaving trade. The
enraged hand-weavers burnt down a mill at Manchester contain-
ing the new machines, and it was only in the present century,
after the adoption of many improvements, that the swift-working
loom was generally used. The inventor of the principle justly
received a grant of ten thousand pounds.
To Josiah Wedgwood, far beyond all others, Britain owes her
high position in the fictile trade. He found it a rude industry; he
left it a great and flourishing business, producing objects of high
art, things of combined beauty and utility. Holland, with her
78 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
ware of Delft, and France, the native land of Bernard Palissy, had
hitherto been productive of the best pottery. Some coarse goods
had long been made in Staffordshire. German artisans had fur-
nished fine porcelain, first at Chelsea, then at Derby, while some
improved pottery had begun to appear at Burslem, in Staffordshire.
This hamlet, as it then was, gave birth, in 1730, to Wedgwood.
His family had long been engaged, with some success, in the
trade, and the young Josiah, as an excellent "thrower" or worker
at the potter's wheel, for some years worked at his father's business.
A weakness of the right knee broke off this toil, and Wedgwood
turned his efforts towards artistic improvement in the objects made.
In 1759 he had a small factory at Burslem, and made many ex-
periments, ending in improvement of both white stoneware and
the cream-coloured ware. The colour, the lightness of weight, the
form, glaze, and decoration, were beyond all previous make in
Europe. The Wedgwood- ware soon had a wide renown for its
hardness and durability, and its power of receiving the most delicate
and brilliant hues produced by fused metallic oxides and ochres.
His admirable works caused the development of the Staffordshire
handicraft into the vast industry which has bestowed the name of
The Potteries on a large and flourishing district, crowded with
towns.
In James Watt, we come to the greatest of all transformers of
the world's industrial system. Mining, manufactures, agriculture,
printing, navigation, and locomotion by land, were all to receive,
from the principle applied by the genius of Watt to practical ends,
an impulse producing the most marvellous results. The general
use of the power of steam in driving machines was due to the
inventive skill of this illustrious man, born, the son of a merchant,
in 1736, at Greenock. At twenty-one years of age, Watt was
maker of mathematical instruments to the University of Glasgow:
in 1763 he became a civil engineer, making surveys for harbours
and canals. In the days of the earlier Stuart kings, a French
engineer, Solomon de Caus, had thought of employing steam in
industry. The Marquis of Worcester, in 1663, showed his
acquaintance with a rude form of steam-engine, which was after-
wards improved by Thomas Savery and Thomas Newcomen, the
former of whom employed the principle of obtaining a vacuum by
condensation, while Newcomen developed the Frenchman Papin's
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 79
device of a piston working in a cylinder. Steam was employed for
pumping out water that gathered in mines, but the engine was a
wasteful machine of little utility, until Watt devised the separate
condenser, and made the engine double-acting, by using steam for
both the up-stroke and down-stroke of the piston. His adoption
of a fly-wheel; of a "governor" to regulate the quantity of steam
passing into the cylinder; of an indicator, to measure the pressure
upon the piston; and of an automatic slide-valve, to regulate the
action of the steam in the cylinder, created a machine almost the
same, in essential points, as that now used. In partnership with
the able Matthew Boulton of the Soho Foundry, near Birmingham,
Watt began to supply manufacturers with the means of working at
a speed, and with a power of accurate production, that were soon
to transform the face of the land. The first engine constructed by
Watt that was ever employed in the weaving trade was one made
in 1785 for the works of Messrs. Robinson, at Papplewick, in
Nottinghamshire; the first ever used in Lancashire was at the
factory of Mr. Drinkwater, in Manchester, four years later. In 1 790,
Arkwright had one in use at one of his mills; the first Watt's
engine used in Scotland was furnished, in 1792, to Messrs. Scott &
Stevenson, of Glasgow. In all these cases, the factories whose
machines were driven by the new power were engaged in the
cotton trade. The steam-engine was soon engaged in flax-spinning
at Leeds, and, in 1793, the same rising town first used Watt's
mechanism for the spinning of wool. A Bradford worsted-mill
applied this mighty agency in 1800, and factories for spinning and
weaving soon arose in great numbers in the midlands, north, and
north-west, where the coal-fields could furnish cheap supplies of the
needed fuel for the engines. The various processes of fabrication
were henceforth conducted, on a well-arranged system, under the
same roof, or at any rate in various workshops erected in close
connection. Machinery took the place, to a vast extent, of human
hands, and armies of workpeople, of both sexes and of all ages fit
for toil, were brought under a strict discipline in order to maintain
the ever-growing supply of clothing and of other goods demanded
by the needs of people in four quarters of the globe.
The increased production of woven fabrics was accompanied
by great improvement in the method of bleaching. The art of
chemistry came to the aid of the manufacturers of cotton and linen
8O OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
cloth, and enabled them to whiten, within the space of two or three
days, the fabrics which, up to the middle of the eighteenth century,
had required labour applied, at long intervals, during six or eight
months. A Scdt, Dr. Home of Edinburgh, about 1750, taught
the bleachers to use water mixed with sulphuric acid instead of
sour milk, and the more powerful agent shortened by one-half the
time required for bleaching. About thirty years later, the famous
Swedish chemist, Carl Wilhelm Scheele, who, in his brief life of
forty-four years, made many most valuable discoveries, mentioned,
about 1783, the effect of chlorine in whitening a cork. The French
chemist, Berthollet, a follower of the illustrious Lavoisier, con-
ceived the idea of applying the new acid to the purpose of bleach-
ing. In 1785 he won success in his experiments, and James Watt,
then staying in Paris, carried the system back to Scotland. His
father-in-law, Mr. Macgregor, adopted chlorine, and Mr. Henry,
of Manchester, an able chemist, proved to the bleachers of his
town and neighbourhood, in 1788, the perfect treatment of cloth
by means of the new agent. Its use spread far and wide, and the
fabrics of the mills now only needed to remain for a few days in
the hands of the bleacher.
The art of calico-printing, introduced into England by a
Frenchman about 1690, was brought into Lancashire in 1764. Mr.
Robert Peel, at his mills near Blackburn, practised the process on
a very large scale, and he and his successor, the first baronet,
derived therefrom vast profit and fame. The aid of steam was
of great value in moving the huge cylinders of engraved copper,
and many thousands of hands were soon employed in tending the
machinery.
When we turn to other branches of trade, we see the linen
manufacture greatly developed in Scotland. At the Union, much
of the money granted for the fostering of industries was used to
encourage the making of linen. In 1727, the Scottish Board of
Manufactures invited over some French weavers, skilled in making
cambric. They settled between Edinburgh and Leith, on a site
still called " Picardy " Place. About the middle of the century,
large grants of money were voted by Parliament for increasing the
make of linen in the Highlands, and great progress was made.
The British Linen Company, still a flourishing banking corporation,
was founded at Edinburgh in 1746, for the purpose of lending
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 8 1
money to the makers of the fabric. In 1750, the annual production
of Scotland had reached seven millions of yards. The making of
finer sorts of paper, introduced by the Huguenot refugees, became
established in England and Scotland early in the eighteenth cen-
tury. The fabrication of glass for windows and other uses dates
from Tudor times, when some Flemings brought the art to London.
In Stuart days, Venetian artists improved the trade. In 1773, the
"British Plate Glass Manufacturers" was the title of a company
founded near St. Helen's, in Lancashire, a district thenceforth
largely devoted to the work.
The improved use of steam for engines at coal-mines caused a
great increase in the output, through the effectual pumping thereby
obtained. The iron trade and other manufactures in metal received
a sudden and vast development. Early in the eighteenth century,
some iron-ore had been imported from abroad, and, after it had
been smelted at works in the Forest of Dean, the pure metal was
distributed among the merchants, who gave out the rough iron, to
be worked up into its various forms for sale, to the domestic
makers, or small masters in the craft. A little iron was also made
in Lancashire and Yorkshire. The use of coal for smelting, intro-
duced or revived in 1713, by Abraham Darby, at the Coalbrook-
dale furnaces, in Shropshire, gave some impetus to the manufacture,
but it declined again until the introduction of coke as fuel, the
invention of a new blowing-machine, the application of steam, and
of Henry Cort's processes of puddling and rolling, caused an annual
production, by 1 788, of the then vast quantity of seventy thousand
tons. The great ironworks at Carron, near Falkirk, were founded
in 1760. The vast iron and coal field of South Wales had been
opened up, five years previously, by an iron-master named Bacon,
who leased a large district near Merthyr Tydvil. Foundries soon
arose at Bristol, London, and Liverpool. In 1767, the Coalbrook-
dale works made iron rails to replace wooden ones on the tram-
ways there used, and in 1778 the first iron bridge ever made was
there cast and set up. Another advance in the metal trade was
the great production of superior tools and mechanism, due to the
ingenuity of Brindley, Smeaton, and other able engineers. Hence
came, in time, the substitution, on a large scale, of iron hands for
human, in the ingenious machines employed for shaping, planing,
slotting, drilling, and other work in metal. A vast trade in the
VOL. I.
82 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
construction of machinery to be worked by hands, or driven by
steam under human guidance, was an outcome of the new skill and
energy displayed in the closing years of the century. The British
nation was fairly launched, amid the dangers and losses of war, on
the great industrial career which was to supply her with the means
of meeting a portion of her vast expenditure, and of holding her
own against a host of foes.
The industrial revolution had important effects on the distribu-
tion of the population. The northern, north-western, and north-
midland parts of the country, where great coal-fields were found
and were extensively worked, after the application of steam to
machinery, drew to themselves the workers of the southern,
eastern, and western districts, where the textile trades had hitherto
held their chief seats. The growth of manufactures is, in a large
degree, indicated by the increased output of coal from the mines,
which rose from about two and a half millions of tons in 1700 to
over six millions in 1770, and, with a far greater rapidity, to above
ten millions of tons in 1795. The change from the domestic to
the factory system carried the artisans from villages to towns.
The use of steam instead of water, as power for driving machinery,
drew them away from the mills once planted, in lonely spots often
rich with the beauties of nature in her happiest moods, where
running streams came down from springs on wild moors, haunted
only by furred and feathered creatures, to work in the valley the
spindles and looms of man. The toilers and makers of wealth
were now to dwell by factories built near the mines which supplied
the needful fuel for the new monster of force that fed on coal.
Many a new town had then its rise in southern Lancashire and
western Yorkshire. The north of England, and the south-west
of Scotland, where coal was found in its richest deposits, became
the great centres of wealth and population. The prosperity of
Norwich and our eastern towns, famous for crapes and the lighter
woollens; of Bradford-on-Avon, and her sisters in the west, noted
for fine serge; of Stroud and her neighbour towns of Gloucester-
shire, where the Cotswold wool was worked up into the finest
broadcloth, began to pale before the rising fortunes of Halifax and
Leeds, of Huddersfield and the new Bradford of the West Riding.
At Glasgow, bleaching and calico-printing had been established in
1738, thirty years before they were heard of in Lancashire, and, in
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 83
the last years of the century, the discovery of bleaching powder, or
chloride of lime, by Mr. Charles Tennant, laid the foundation of
the enormous trade in chemicals. The town of the Clyde took up
with zeal the inventions of Arkwright, Cartwright, and their com-
peers, and embarked, in spinning and weaving, upon that course of
industry which, combined with her commerce on every sea, has
made her one of the wonders of the world. The cotton trade then,
as now, had its English centre in the Lancashire towns clustered
round Manchester as their chief, with some slight overflow into the
neighbouring parts of Cheshire and west Yorkshire.
Grave social and political results followed on the displacement
and changed conditions of labour. The class of artisans was forced
o
down to a lower level. Under the old domestic system of manu-
factures, the workers bought for themselves the yarn for weaving,
and owned the cloth which came from the loom. This they could
sell at the market price, and they thus held the position of inde-
pendent traders. Under the factory system, which at first, it is
true, gave a better income, from the high wages caused by the great
production, and the demand for labour, the artisan became depend-
ent on the mill-owner. Labour was made subject to capital. We
shall notice hereafter the monstrous evils which greed for gain
caused to the men, women, and children who worked for others in
this revolutionized system of industrial life. The migration from
the open country, with its purer air, to the crowded and fetid alleys
of factory towns, had serious effects on health and life. The people
who were left behind in the rural districts, devoid of their former
gains by spinning and weaving, were thrown upon the rates, and
the poor-law question, in later years, became hereby prominent in
formidable guise. The inevitable evils of a state of transition
were felt by the poorer, dependent classes, just as they had been
in Tudor times, when agricultural labour underwent a change.
The gathering of the workers into towns had also a great politi-
cal effect. Close connection led to constant discussion; discussion
dealt with and magnified grounds for discontent. The souls of
artisans were stirred to their depths by the outbreak in France,
which was hailed with joy by Fox and the Whigs, as the champions
of freedom, while Pitt, at the outset, had no desire to assume a
hostile attitude. The son of the great Chatham was, however, the
statesman of the commercial class, and to him the land-owners also,
84 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
both from their own inherent prejudices, and from natural feelings
of horror, wrought into fury by Burke's denunciation of French
excesses, were looking as, not merely the preserver of internal
peace, but the represser of every movement or utterance in favour
of reform. All the upper and middle classes at last supported the
minister when he waged war with France, for the manufacturers
and merchants, in behalf of trade, for the king, clergy, nobles, and
land-owners, as the avenger of outrages done to monarchy, to
religion, and to lords of the soil. The growing wealth of Great
Britain was mortgaged in advance to support the expenditure of
the gigantic struggle, and our children's children, and their
descendants to a distant age, must feel in taxation the effects of a
policy which, right or wrong, commanded the assent of a vast
majority of the British people.
Great, if gradual, progress was made in the art of tillage and
in the breeding of stock during the eighteenth century. A taste
for agriculture, not only as a means of livelihood, but as a pursuit
for men of wealth and leisure, was widely spread. Many rich
merchants and professional men, as well as large owners of the
soil, took a personal interest in cultivation. Great improvements
were made on large estates, and especial regard was paid to the
raising of root-crops and of artificial pasture and various grasses,
for the winter-feeding of increased numbers of cattle and sheep,
which, in their turn, enriched the soil by larger supplies of excellent
manure. The use of lime and clay for mixing with earth that
needed such additional elements was largely developed, and the
result of effort and of expended capital was seen in greater crops
of corn, in weightier cattle, and in more ample fleeces of better
quality from the sheep that supplied the weaver with wool.
One probably evil feature of the time was the disappearance, to
a great degree, of the small freeholders or yeomen, a change which
was due to mingled political and social causes. The wealthier
merchants, seeking to rival the noble class, and to obtain from the
minister whom they supported admission in time to the House of
Lords, were ever seeking to purchase land, and the smaller holdings
were thus absorbed to form large estates. The system of primo-
geniture and of stringent settlements hampered the subdivision of
land, and the changed methods of agriculture, demanding larger
capital, tended to oust the smaller cultivators. Under numerous
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 85
Acts some millions of acres of common and other lands were
inclosed, and thus arose many of the vast estates which still
confine the possession of a large portion of British soil to the
hands of a few land-owners. The country as a whole gained by
the change of system, and by legislation which, in many cases,
acted to the hurt of individuals. There was a great rise of rents
during this period, amounting, in the case of one family of large
land-owners who were regarded as favouring the interests of
tenants, to a five-fold increase during the century — from less than
four shillings to nearly a pound per acre. The labourers who
worked the soil suffered, at the same time, a fall of wages, owing
to the system, dating from the days of Elizabeth, by which the
magistrates regulated the price of their toil. Their poor earnings,
under the evil law then existing, were somewhat . increased by
payments from the rates, and this method of pauperizing the
peasantry had very pernicious and long-enduring effects. The
price of corn rapidly rose, with the great increase of population,
during the latter half of the century, from an average of thirty-six
to forty-eight shillings per quarter. The existing corn-laws pro-
tected the farmers against imported produce, and men of large
capital were able to make considerable profits.
As regards improvement in tillage and stock, much was due
to the spirit of the age which led men to inquire and to make
experiments, and to found societies for the encouragement of the
primitive and all-important pursuit. In 1723 the Society of Im-
provers was founded in Scotland for the good of agriculture,
headed by Lords Reay, Rollo, and Ross, Sir James Fergusson,
Sir Archibald Grant, and other patriotic men. Seventy years
later, the able, active, and enlightened Sir John Sinclair, of Thurso
Castle, after founding a Scottish society for improving the breeds
of sheep and the quality of wool, was a main cause of the founda-
tion of the Board of Agriculture, whose secretary was the famous
traveller and inquirer, Arthur Young. In 1753 the Society of
Arts and Manufactures was founded in England, and its work for
many years included encouragement to progress in agriculture.
In 1777 the Bath and West of England Agricultural Society
arose, preceded and followed by many like institutions. The
Smithfield Club, whose early title was "the Smithfield Cattle and
Sheep Society", arose in 1798. In Scotland, the Highland and
86 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Agricultural Society, still greatly flourishing, was founded in 1784.
In Ireland, the year 1734 saw the formation of the Dublin Society
for the Promotion of Husbandry, which some years later received
a royal charter, and was enabled to do much good work. In the
latter half of the period the king himself won the title of " Farmer
George ", from his enthusiastic regard for his Windsor farm.
The politician Lord Townshend, brother-in-law of Sir Robert
Walpole, retired to his Norfolk seat in 1728, and there served
his country well by encouraging the growth of turnips. This root,
so valuable as the winter food of sheep, was now planted on fields
which had hitherto been left to lie fallow every third year. Norfolk
and Suffolk set sound examples in the new husbandry, and a four-
course rotation of crops — turnips, barley, clover, and wheat — began
to be pursued. In 1776 Mr. Coke of Holkham, founder of the
modern earldom of Leicester, came into possession of his large
estate, and by energy and skill wrought wonders of improvement.
At that time the land was not inclosed, and the people ate bread
made of wheat imported from other parts, or of rye, the only corn
there grown. Coke changed the country of his abode into a
garden of fertility. Resolved to become a tiller of the soil, he
gathered round him the farmers of the district, learned his trade,
and in due time became himself a teacher. Landlord and tenants
were both enriched by the greater growth of produce and the just
rise of rents. Improvement in the sheep, both for use as meat
and for quality of wool, made Coke's name famous throughout the
world, and his elevation to the peerage, long declined by the
modesty of real worth, on the accession of Queen Victoria, was
hailed with delight by all true lovers of the art which he improved
and of the land of his birth.
Suffolk, renowned for its breed of ploughing-horses called
"punches", was now greatly improved by the better and wider
drainage of the soil. From the east of England, good example
spread. In Bedfordshire, near the close of the century, the Duke
of Bedford, at Woburn Abbey, strove to emulate the deeds of the
Norfolk squire, and the growth of corn and production of meat
were vastly increased. Robert Bakewell, a grazier, of Dishley
Grange, in Leicestershire, who died in 1795, had wonderful suc-
cess in breeding sheep, horses, and horned cattle, and his. repu-
tation may be measured by the fact that, in a single season, the
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 87
hire of one of his rams produced the sum of over twelve hundred
pounds. Such were some of the men that raised the stock whose
descendants were in time to produce the swarming flocks and
herds that form the chief wealth of many of our great colonial
possessions. The drainage of some of the eastern fens has been
already described: the same work was done on a large scale in
the low-lying parts of Lincolnshire, and her wolds also began to
feel the benefit of improved farming. In the south, the Wilt-
shire and Hampshire downs, from the growth of turnips, began
to bear greater flocks of sheep. In Yorkshire, the Whig leader,
Lord Rockingham, farming two thousand acres of his own land,
set an example of good husbandry. Sir Digby Legard, in the
east of the same county, succeeded in doubling the product of
wheat per acre upon land reclaimed from the wolds, while he
raised from the same soil a five-fold increase of the former crops
of oats, and a six-fold growth of barley. The rent was raised from
a shilling an acre for the grassy wold to a pound per acre for the
same land under tillage. In Durham, the short-horn ox was already
a famous breed, but it was not till later days that the land was
inclosed or duly cultivated. In Northumberland, towards the
close of the century, great advances were made in tillage, and
the fertile vales of the northern parts gave a large return to
improved methods. In the south of Scotland, East Lothian led
the way to the admirable culture which was wholly to change
the face of the land between the Forth and Clyde and the English
border. The beautiful country of the Teviot and the Tweed had
then but few inclosures or roads. The men who started the work
of improvement which was to lead to such marvellous results of
energy and skill have already been noticed. In Ireland, the lack
of capital and energy and knowledge, with the curse of the
"middleman", combined to produce, on the whole, a system
which, making a large part of the population dependent for sub-
sistence on a single root, was to cause in the end disastrous effects.
The eighteenth century saw much improvement in the means
of internal communication which is needed for easy and lucrative
traffic. The state of things which existed at the close of the
seventeenth century is vividly described in the third chapter of
his history by Lord Macaulay. Under Queen Anne, the condition
of the roads still greatly hampered the conveyance of goods from
88 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
the places of manufacture to the markets for sale and to the ports
for shipment. Only in the summer could large quantities of
produce be taken to distant parts, and many small towns and
villages suffered from scarcity of grain and fuel. Good husbandry
was checked by the lack of cheap manure. About the middle,
and in the latter half of the century, these matters were greatly
altered. Harder roads dispensed with the work of nearly half
the horses formerly needed to drag the waggons through the
depth of mire, and the pack-horses could each carry heavier
loads. The former condition of the highways may be judged by
the fact that, even in 1736, a carriage, in wet weather, required
two hours for the drive from St. James's Palace to Kensington,
and might be stuck in the mud on the way. In Scotland, the
military roads made by General Wade, in the period between the
two Jacobite rebellions, did much to open up the Highlands to
traffic from the then more civilized southern districts. Many
Acts were passed in England for the establishment of turnpike-
trusts on highways, and the roads were kept in repair by the
tolls levied at the countless gates which, until far into the present
reign, were encountered by the traveller by carriage or on horse-
back throughout the land. In 1741 a general Act, apart from the
turnpike-roads, was passed with the intent of providing for the
repair of the parish-roads and other by-ways of traffic. For the
conveyance of passengers, the stage-waggon and the waggon-coach
were the chief methods known to early Georgian times. In 1739,
the advertisement of a " flying- waggon " undertakes to convey
people from London to Frome in Somerset, a few miles south
of Bath, in two and a half days.
The history of the modern mail-coaches begins with the year
1784, when the enterprising Mr. John Palmer, manager of the
Bath Theatre, and M.P. for that city, began to carry letters for
the Post-office. The coach which left London, under the new
system, at eight in the morning, arrived in Bristol an hour before
midnight. The plan was adopted by most of the larger towns,
and the pace of transit, as the roads grew better and the organi-
zation was improved, was raised by degrees from six miles an
hour to eight. The care of Parliament was largely devoted to
the removal of all hindrances to safe and speedy traffic. The
width of the roads, ditching, draining, the prevention of all ob-
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 89
structions by fairs and markets, by floods and falling trees, by
straying cattle and rustic sports; the erection of milestones and
direction-posts; the placing of the names of towns and villages
at the main entrances by the high-roads; the width of wheels,
the weights of goods, and the number of passengers to be
carried on each vehicle, the horsing, the harnessing, the very
forms of axles, and the method of attaching the tires of wheels,
were all made, from time to time, subjects of inquiry and regula-
tion. More than five hundred turnpike Acts had been passed
before the year 1770. Some preparation had thus been made
for the increase of trade caused by the industrial revolution. It
was not until many years of the present century had passed,
however, that the English people saw the swift, well-horsed,
perfectly driven, minutely punctual, festive-looking coaches, with
scarlet-coated guard and resounding horn, that enlivened the
perfect roads made in that age by the skilful labours of Telford
and Macadam.
The development of our communications by water, of vast
importance for the traffic in heavy goods, the products of the rising
factories and the mines, was due to the example set by the wise
expenditure of a noble and the daring spirit of an engineer. The
word " canal " at once suggests the names of James Brindley and
of Francis Egerton, third Duke of Bridgewater. The history of
canals in Britain would carry us back to the days of Roman occu-
pation, when they cut two great Dykes in Lincolnshire, one of
which, the Foss Dyke, is still navigable. Near the end of the
seventeenth century, the Aire and Calder Navigation made a
beginning of the modern system of artificial water-ways.
James Brindley, the great pioneer of these important works, was
born in Derbyshire, in 1716. First a mill-wright, then an engineer,
he showed much skill in the construction of a water-engine for the
draining of a coal-mine. By a happy turn of fortune for him and
for his country, he came under the notice of the young Duke of
Bridgewater, a man who had seen something of the world, and had
then retired to one of his estates, wearied of London life, and seek-
ing to remove encumbrances from his property. At Worsley,
seven miles from Manchester, then, in 1758, containing about forty
thousand people, the young noble possessed a rich bed of coal, and
his object was to convey the fuel cheaply to his neighbours in
9O OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Manchester, and in the end to reach Liverpool. After discussion
with Brindley, an audacious plan was formed for constructing a
new water-way without locks, by cutting through hills and crossing
streams. The bold design, in the course of twelve years, was
carried out with complete success. The astonishment of Brindley's
countrymen was aroused by the gigantic works now executed. In
the mines at Worsley, canals were carried through a mile and a
half of tunnels. The course of the great canal lay through valleys
where huge mounds of earth were raised to form its bed. Rocky
hills were pierced, and at Barton the river Irwell was crossed by
an aqueduct six hundred feet in length and nearly forty high. A
land agent, John Gilbert, helped to raise money for the expensive
operations, and the duke, resolved to finish what he had begun,
lived for years on the simplest fare, and reduced his household
expenses to the standard of a small trader. In 1771, the "eighth
wonder of the world", as a letter of the day styles this canal, had
reached, by way of Manchester, Runcorn on the Mersey, forty-two
miles from Worsley, and thus brought the coal-pits into connection
with the rising seaport of the day. The price of coals in Man-
chester fell by one half, and the duke, by this and like enlightened
labours, acquired vast wealth. The great engineer to whom the
work was intrusted was a plain-looking man, rude in speech and
devoid of education. The workings of his brain supplied the place
of written documents and drawings, and he gained his undying fame
by the sheer force of native ability. This noble achievement was
followed by the Grand Trunk Navigation, or Staffordshire Canal,
also planned and partly executed by Brindley : his early death in
1772, hastened by excessive toil of body and mind, robbed him of
the sight of its completed works. The pottery and iron districts of
Staffordshire were thus connected with the Mersey and the Trent.
In all, Brindley either made or planned nearly four hundred miles
of canal, uniting the Thames, the H umber, the Mersey, and the
Severn, and thus giving London communication by water with
Bristol, Liverpool, and Hull.
Before the end of the century, from 1791 to 1794, there was
a " mania ", or rush of speculation, in canals, and more than three
thousand miles of such works were ultimately made within the
United Kingdom. In Scotland, the Forth and the Clyde were
joined by a canal planned in 1768. The Crinan Canal, nine
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 91
miles long, running through charming scenery, and uniting a
branch of Lochfyne, in Argyleshire, with the Atlantic at the
Sound of Jura, was constructed between 1793 and 1801. This
excellent work avoids the passage of seventy miles round the
Mull of Kintyre. The famous Caledonian Canal, traversing
some of Scotland's noblest scenery, was first devised, as a prac-
ticable work, by the eye and judgment of James Watt : its execu-
tion came only with the early years of the present century. The
canals at that date were largely used, notably in Scotland, for the
conveyance of passengers with an ease and smoothness far surpas-
sing those of travel on roads. The Forth and Clyde Canal, by
means of very light barges called "swift boats", sharply cut at the
bows and with fine lines of structure, carried people at the rate of
nearly nine miles an hour. The "fly-boats", between London and
Birmingham, of a heavier build, had about half that speed. The
ordinary boats carried some twenty tons of goods, with a towage of
from two to three miles an hour.
The building of bridges, an art which forms so important an
element in developing communications, made little progress in
Europe from the days of the Roman Empire until the eighteenth
century, when the French architects led the way to improvement,
and the famous Perronet executed works of masterly skill over the
Seine at Paris, Nogent, and Neuilly. The longest bridge built in
England in mediaeval times was that constructed at Burton, over the
Trent, of freestone, in the twelfth century. Its thirty-six arches
extended for over fifteen hundred feet, and the bridge remained in
use until 1864. A really great work was completed in 1750 in the
erection, by William Edwards, a country mason, of the bridge over
the Taff, midway between Merthyr Tydvil and Cardiff. This
bold and ingenious structure gave the name of " Newbridge " to the
place where it spans the river with a single arch of 140 feet. The
same architect built several other bridges in South Wales. The
days of the greatest bridge engineers had not yet arrived. A cast-
iron bridge of a single arch, spanning one hundred feet, was erected
over the Severn in 1779, at the place thence called " Ironbridge".
The constructor of this was Mr. Darby, of the Coalbrookdale Iron
Works. In London, old London Bridge, completed in 1209,
remained covered with houses until 1757: the structure then, with
new parapets and balustrades erected on each side, outlasted the
92 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
century. The old Blackfriars Bridge was completed in 1769, from
plans of Robert Mylne, a native of Edinburgh, and once bore the
name of Pitt Bridge, in honour of the Earl of Chatham, a designa-
tion dropped by degrees from its inconvenience in not marking for
strangers the spot where it crossed the river. This bridge con-
tinued to exist for nearly a century. The first bridge made at
Westminster was opened to the public in 1750, and lasted for more
than a hundred years. The other bridges crossing the Thames in
London belong to the period since 1800.
The first regular inland post was established in 1635, for the
keeping up of communications between London and Edinburgh,
with by-posts to the chief towns lying near the main road. A
royal proclamation, two years later, forbade the carriage of letters by
any persons "other than the messengers of the king's postmaster-
general", with certain exceptions therein named. This service was
under the charge of Thomas Witherings, who had been for some
years, with William Frizell, controller of the English post for
foreign letters. About this date, eight chief postal lines for England
were established at a cost of eightpence to Scotland for a single
letter, sixpence in England for a distance exceeding 140 miles,
fourpence between 80 and 140 miles, and twopence for shorter dis-
tances. In 1657, under the Commonwealth, many improvements
were made, and these were confirmed by statute after the Restora-
tion, the year 1662 being the date of the legal establishment of a
postal system. In Scotland, the Parliament in 1695 passed an Act
for a general letter-post. Towards the end of the seventeenth
century a penny-post was set up in London for letters and small
parcels, with Thomas Dockwra as controller. In 1710 we have
the first modern "Postmaster-general", when an Act rearranged the
whole system, and a general post-office for the three kingdoms and
the colonies was established. An Irish post-office, as a separate
system, was set up by the "independent" parliament in 1784.
With the institution of mail-coaches, as described above, in 1784,
Mr. Palmer became controller to the General Post-office, and letters
were henceforth carried with far greater safety, regularity, and
speed.
We may well conclude this part of our subject, displaying some-
what of the internal economy of the British Empire up to the year
1 80 1, with a few suggestive figures for comparison with those to be
INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 93
hereafter given. The growth of manufactures in the last third of
the eighteenth century, the period including what has been called
the Industrial Revolution, is thus indicated. In 1766 the number
of pounds weight of foreign and colonial wool imported into the
United Kingdom was nearly two millions; in 1800, it was above
eight and a half millions. In 1764 the number of pounds weight of
raw cotton imported was under four millions; in 1800, it just
exceeded fifty-six millions. For the iron trade, we take a period of
about sixty years. In 1740, the pig-iron made in Great Britain
(England, Wales, and Scotland) was a little over seventeen thou-
sand tons; in 1796 it amounted to one hundred and twenty-five
thousand tons, a quantity more than doubled ten years later. In
1750 the value of exports for England alone approached thirteen
millions of pounds sterling; in 1800, for Great Britain, it exceeded
thirty-four millions. It is needless to state that in those days but
a small part of this increase was due to Scotland and Wales. In
1750, the imports of England alone just exceeded in value seven
and three-quarter millions; in 1800, with a great war raging,
the value of imports for Great Britain was twenty-eight and
a quarter millions. In 1766, the tonnage of ships cleared
outwards from British ports was nearly seven hundred and fifty
thousand tons, in time of peace, of which nearly fourteen-fifteenths
was British shipping. In 1800, during war, the ships cleared out-
wards reached nearly two millions of tons, of which more than
three-fifths were British. In 1774 the revenue raised in England
alone somewhat exceeded seven millions; in 1800 the United
Kingdom, for this purpose mostly England, contributed more than
thirty-three millions. In 1760 the population of England and
Wales was a little beyond six and a half millions; in 1801, the year
of the first census, it had nearly reached nine millions. In 1776
the poor-rate just exceeded a million and a half; in 1803 it had
reached more than four millions of pounds, an amount which
betrays at once an increase of poverty in one class, along with a
great growth of national wealth, and a scandalous mismanagement
partly due to the operation of a poor-law wholly unsuited to the
times.
LIBRARY,
DEC 13 1397
BOOK II.
BRITISH COLONIES AND POSSESSIONS BEFORE THE
NINETEENTH CENTURY.
CHAPTER I.
CHARACTER AND METHODS OF COLONIZATION — EARLY NAVIGATORS.
Our Colonies in general — Modern sense of the term "colony" — Methods of colonization —
Maritime enterprise of European nations in fifteenth century — Discoveries of
Columbus, Vespucci, and the Cabots — Spanish colonization in America — The
aboriginal tribes of America.
Before entering upon the history of the existing colonies and
dependencies of Great Britain during the period prior to the nine-
teenth century, it is our purpose to trace the career of those colonies
in North America which constituted the fine dominion lost to this
country soon after the days that saw the rise of a new British
empire in the East, and in the part of America lying north of the
settlements which engaged in a successful revolt from British
rule.
A brief dissertation on colonies in general may well precede a
particular account of the important and interesting offshoots from a
parent political stem which, with diverse forms of origin and de-
velopment, are included in the general term of "British colonies".
A " colony", in its original agricultural sense, was more properly
called a "plantation", the term applied to the first British settle-
ments in the West Indies and in North America. The modern
sense of the word implies a community of people whose forefathers,
or themselves, quitted their native country to dwell permanently in
another land, either devoid or nearly empty of inhabitants, and
there pursue their fortunes in some condition of political connection
with, or dependence on, the mother country. To this definition we
may add that the " colony " may consist of persons whose superior
strength, supported by help from home, enables them to dominate
a native population in the new land, in spite of great inferiority of
numbers on the part of the new-comers. It will be seen that we
CHARACTER AND METHODS OF COLONIZATION. 95
thus embrace at any rate a large part of the dependencies of the
United Kingdom, since we include the vast Canadian Dominion,
the West Indies, the Australasian colonies, most of the African
settlements, and many smaller colonial possessions. It is equally
clear that India, where the British residents have, for the most part,
not made their permanent home, and Malta, and Gibraltar, and
Aden, and Cyprus, mainly military and naval posts, lie outside the
real meaning of what, in popular use, is the elastic term "colonies",
applied officially to all our foreign possessions, with the sole excep-
tion of what is termed, with some propriety derived from its mode
of acquisition and of tenure, the "Indian Empire".
The methods of colonization, by which the " Greater Britain "
has been formed, have been as various as the motives which have
led men abroad, in all ages of the world, from their own country to
foreign lands. In some cases, the love of adventure and the spirit
of enterprise, aroused in the hearts of British citizens at the
time of the great European awakening under our Tudor
sovereigns, drove men across the seas to discover new lands,
to coerce aboriginal possessors, to seek new wealth, to be
extracted either from hoped-for mines of silver and gold, or from
the bosom of a soil making rich returns for cultivation. Rights of
settlement and possession were conferred by royal charters on bands
of adventurers under some trusted leader, or on the pioneers and
agents of companies formed for the prosecution of trade. In other
cases, as we shall see, social or political discontent, sometimes due
to religious persecution, sent men beyond the stormy waters of the
Atlantic to found new homes wherein they might freely worship
according to the dictates of their own conscience, or might be
exempt from the burdens of poverty or other ills. Again, the
British government, from time to time, banished parties of dis-
orderly or disaffected subjects, both men and women, to distant
parts where they would cease for ever to plague the body politic at
home. To some small extent, the missionary spirit, or desire for
the conversion of heathens to the Christian faith, influenced our
early efforts at colonization, but the commercial motive, the desire
for wealth, was the main agent in the colonial expansion attempted
and achieved, in turn or simultaneously, by Portugal, Spain, Hol-
land, France, and Great Britain. Germany and Italy, the latest of
all the colonizing nations, have sent forth people either driven
96 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
abroad by pressure of poverty, or by the purely commercial spirit,
or by a desire to escape from military conscription.
The success of the British race in colonization has been due to
the possession and use of certain physical and moral qualities, in-
herent or acquired by the experience of ages. Our nation has,
apart from India and some other countries where our citizens abide
either in very limited numbers or for a limited time, migrated to
temperate or cold climates suited to our bodily constitution and our
British way of life. This condition is, in the main, satisfied by
Canada and the Cape, by Australia, and above all by New Zealand.
Physical endurance, energy, reproductive power, a love of explora-
tion, a masterful spirit, a keen commercial sense, a power of
adaptation to new circumstances and new peoples, a progressive
genius, a faculty of government, native vigour, independence, and
self-reliance — these are the chief possessions of a people whose
descendants are now manifestly destined to occupy a large part of
the world with their language, their religion, and their political and
social institutions. The Phoenicians, and the Greek republics of
olden time made no permanent conquests. The Jews, in ancient
and mediaeval times, and the Chinese, in modern days, were and
have been mere foreign settlers in countries already occupied by
overwhelming numbers of people alien from the immigrating race.
The Spaniards and the French showed, the one in Central and
South America, the other in Canada and in Hindostan, much
power of conciliating native races, but the faculty of ruling, and of
retaining dominion in a lasting form, appears to have been granted
in a larger degree to men of the Teutonic race, as to the Romans
of the ancient world, than to any other of the peoples or states
whose name is writ large in the history of mankind.
When the possession of the mariner's compass, to show the
way; of the printing-press, to spread knowledge; and of gun-
powder, to enable small bodies of civilized explorers to overcome
large numbers of ignorant natives, had provided fitting instruments
for the work to be undertaken, the chief European peoples began
to look abroad to distant lands. In the coming contest for
supremacy the compact, enterprising Portugal showed the way,
round the Cape of Good Hope, to the coasts of India and China,
and sailed westwards to Brazil. The conquest of this pioneer
in colonization, by her more powerful neighbour, Spain, made an
CHARACTER AND METHODS OF COLONIZATION. 97
end of Portugal as a chief people in colonial dominion, leaving
her the just and lasting renown of giving to the world Prince
Henry the navigator; Bartolomeu Diaz, the first modern mariner
to round the Cape; Vasco da Gama, the first modern European
to reach the East Indies wholly by sea; Magalhaens, the first
European who ever sailed into, and the man who named, the
Pacific; and Alfonso d' Albuquerque, the great, because wise and
good, viceroy of the Indies. For American discovery the com-
mercial republic of Genoa supplied Spain with Christopher
Columbus, and her great rival on the Adriatic coast of Italy gave
John Cabot, and his son Sebastian, to England.
The great colonial empire founded by Spain, with a feudal and
despotic system of rule, decayed with the decline, and, to a large
degree, perished for her with the downfall of Spanish power in
Europe. Political and commercial progress, growth in freedom,
mental expansion with the changing times, were wanting to the
mother country, and, early in the present century, her American
possessions fell away in revolt, to become separate states with
republican rule. The Dutch, in due time, freed by desperate
efforts from Spanish control, appeared upon the colonizing scene of
history. This dogged people of Teutonic blood, gallant seamen,
devoted to labour, skilled in trade, acquired a large share in
Portugal's eastern sway of commercial affairs. Their mariners
were found in Arctic seas, as well as amid the spicy breezes of the
coasts of Ceylon and the Moluccas. Their settlers were soon at
the Cape of Good Hope, and on the banks of the Hudson in North
America. A Dutchman was the first to round Cape Horn; a
Dutchman the first to view Tasmania and New Zealand. Worthy
antagonists of British sailors in Stuart times, when they fought
so bravely for "the honour of the flag", and for the carrying trade
which aroused British envy and brought on hostile legislation in
the Navigation Acts, this sturdy little nation, after a brief period
of brilliant renown, succumbed to our rising maritime power, to
remain, in the nineteenth century, one of the most solid and
respectable of minor European states, with rich colonial possessions
in Eastern seas.
The contest in East and West, of Great Britain against France,
the last in the line of earlier European colonizing states, will be
dealt with at a later stage of this narration. With great aptitude
VOL. I.
98 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
for colonization, in courage, warlike skill, enterprise, and tactful
dealing with native races, the French were destined, at the moment
when complete success appeared to be within their grasp, to lose
all that they had won through the efforts of brilliant soldiers
abroad, sometimes helped by great statesmanship at home. France,
in fact, undertook in colonial affairs what was beyond the strength
of a nation engaged, at the same period, in a career of European
aggrandizement, and her worthless rulers, in the age preceding the
French Revolution, united gross political and economical corruption
to the most unwise and ungrateful treatment of able and patriotic
colonial leaders. Religious bigotry, directed against the Huguenots,
who should have been encouraged, as men skilled in the industrial
arts and in maritime affairs, to become the bone and substance of
their country's colonial system, was another chief cause of French
colonial failure.
The world of Europe and America has lately (1892) celebrated
the four hundredth anniversary of the great work of exploration
due to the genius and courage of Christopher Columbus. We
do not in the least degree detract from the fame of that illustrious
man when we assert the indubitable fact that he made, not a new
discovery, but a re-discovery of a once found and then forgotten
region. Five centuries before his time there were colonies of
Norsemen in Greenland and in the coast-lands much farther south.
The way to North America had been partly and circuitously
shown by Danes who, in 874, colonized Iceland, where they found
some Irish monks who had come thither from their own country
"because they desired for the love of God to be in a state of
pilgrimage they recked not where". A rover called Eric the Red,
banished for crime, first from Norway and then from Iceland,
made his way to Greenland, a region so named by him with the
object of drawing settlers as if to a fertile land. Two colonies
were there formed in 985. A man named Bjarni, in 986, who
had started from Iceland for the purpose of joining his father in
Greenland, was driven by north winds within sight of the lands
since called New England, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland.
A son of Eric the Red wintered, in 994, on the coast near Cape
Cod, Massachusetts, and the place was called Vynland, from
the wild grapes seen growing. Some Irish settlers were found
there also, and a district to the south was once called " Great
CHARACTER AND METHODS OF COLONIZATION. 99
Ireland". Monuments and runic inscriptions on the American
coast confirm the evidence of the Icelandic sagas or tales concern-
ing the Danish expeditions. There are statements as to inter-
course between Greenland and Iceland in the twelfth century,
and between Markland (Nova Scotia) and Iceland in the fourteenth
century. These early settlements had, however, been quitted
by the people, or the colonists had died off, and in the time of
Columbus the matter had been entirely forgotten.
The great navigator, Cristoforo Colombo (Latinised into
Christopher Columbus, and rendered, in Spanish, as Cristobal
Colon, from another Latin form Colonus, referring to his work
and its results), was born about 1440, in or near Genoa. After
much service at sea, in peace and war, he was wrecked, about
1470, in a naval battle off Cape St. Vincent, and was thrown on
the coast of Portugal. At Lisbon he married the daughter of
an Italian navigator, who had been governor at Madeira, and
Columbus lived for some time at the Portuguese capital, engaged
in making charts for his livelihood. The study of his father-in-
law's papers and maps seems to have turned his mind to thoughts
of western voyages, and in 1474 he desired to reach Asia in
that direction. His main object was to benefit the merchants
of Genoa, whose land trade with the East was greatly harmed
by the conquering and ravaging Turks and Tartars. He had
no idea of discovering a " New World", and part of his ambition
was to rival the Portuguese efforts at reaching India by the east-
ward route round the Cape of Good Hope. It is remarkable
that Columbus never knew the real nature of his own discovery,
but died, like Amerigo Vespucci, the Florentine, and other earlier
successors, in the belief that he had found some part of Asia.
Hence came the misnomer of " Indians" for the native people,
and of "West Indies" for the groups of isles.
After a voyage beyond Iceland in 1477, Columbus spent many
years in vain applications for help to wealthy and powerful men of
his time. The senate of Genoa, King John II. of Portugal, Henry
the Seventh of England, and Spanish grandees, have all the dis-
credit of declining to listen to, or, at any rate, to practically aid
the persevering and enterprising navigator. The Duke of Medina
Celi, shifting the burden of importunity, sent Columbus to Isabella
of Castile, and the good offices of Juan Perez de Marchena, a
100 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
monk who had been confessor to the Catholic queen, at last
brought the Genoese, in spite of ecclesiastical opposition, into
communication with Ferdinand and Isabella. It was not until
seven weary years of consideration, with hot and cold fits of
changing favour and rejection, had passed away, that the Spanish
sovereigns gave their consent to the expedition westwards.
Columbus, with the title of admiral, sailed from the harbour of
Palos, in the south-west of Spain, with three little ships, the Santa
Maria, the Pinta, and the Nina, carrying in all one hundred
and twenty men, on Friday, August 3rd, 1492. The interesting,
picturesque, and touching details of this memorable voyage — the
murmurings of the men, the carved staff floating on the waves,
the branch with fresh leaves and berries, the distant moving
lights on land — are known to all readers of maritime discovery.
The soil first reached, and touched by the feet of the adventurers
amidst tears of joy and prayers and songs of praise, was that of
an island styled by Columbus San Salvador (Holy Saviour), and
is uncertainly identified with Watling's Island, one of the Bahamas;
it was, beyond doubt, an island of that group. The discoverers
returned to Europe after visits to Cuba and to Hayti, then called
by Columbus Hispaniola or Little Spain. The flag-ship of the
admiral, the Santa Maria, had been wrecked; the Pinta had
parted company in stormy weather; the Nina alone, with
Columbus on board, came to anchor at Palos on March i5th,
1493, amid shouting crowds, ringing bells, and the roar of cannon.
The Genoese navigator, who had brought back with him visible
and tangible proofs of success in birds, animals, plants, gold, and
six natives of the islands, was received at Barcelona with the
highest distinction, seated before Ferdinand and Isabella to tell
his tale, and created a grandee of Spain. In later voyages, along
with many troubles from quarrels, Spanish jealousy of a famous
foreigner, bodily disease, and cruel treatment at the hands of
insolent officials, Columbus discovered Jamaica, Dominica, Trini-
dad, and the mainland of South America, and died at Valladolid,
in Spain, in 1506. The race of people found at that period in
the West Indian isles is known as Caribs, now existing, in a pure
form, only near the Orinoco and in the wilder parts of Guiana.
The success of Columbus caused an outburst of exploring enter-
prise in the same direction. One of his friends, Amerigo Ves-
CHARACTER AND METHODS OF COLONIZATION. IOI
pucci, first visited the new region in 1499, and, becoming widely
known as the preparer of charts and routes for voyagers, the
maker of maps, with an injustice to Columbus in no wise due
to Vespucci's action, was immortalized by the bestowal of the
name America on the continent now made known to the European
world.
The mainland of North America was discovered in June, 1497,
by Sebastian Cabot, son of John Cabot, a Venetian pilot, who had
long been settled as a merchant at Bristol. Sebastian set sail
from that port, perhaps with his father, and with one or more
brothers. The voyagers reached Labrador, and, as it seems,
Nova Scotia. The father probably died about 1498, Sebastian
Cabot, in a course of discovery, having made his way to New-
foundland in the preceding year, and coasted south as far as
Chesapeake Bay. Other explorers aimed at a north-west passage
to India, and sailed on various voyages with which we are not
now concerned. The opening up of the vast regions of North
America was begun by Spanish explorers. Ponce de Leon,
governor of Porto Rico, searching, in old age and broken health,
for a fabled fountain whose waters would confer perpetual youth,
landed, in 1512, on the coast of the region named by him Florida
from the day of its discovery, which took place on Easter Sunday,
the festival styled, in Spanish, Pascua Florida. By the year
1522 Cortez had achieved his wonderful conquest of Mexico.
De Narvaez, six years later, strove to conquer Florida, but was
harassed by the Indians, and driven to take to boats on the Gulf
of Mexico, where he perished by shipwreck. The gallant Ferdin-
and de Soto, lured by the hope of finding gold, landed with an
expedition in Florida in May, 1539, and marched forth into un-
known regions with the waving of banners, the gleaming of lances
and helmets, and the sound of trumpets. The lands now called
Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi were crossed, and in 1541 the
party, or some of them, came out of the forest on the banks of
the mighty Mississippi, meaning, in the tongue of the Algonquins,
a leading aboriginal race, " Great River". After another year
of weary travel, unsuccessful in the search for gold, De Soto died,
and the enterprise virtually ended with the sinking of his body,
for burial, in the stream. Melendez, in 1565, founded a colony
in Florida, and named the place St. Augustine, in honour of the
102 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
day: this place is the oldest town in the United States. Cali-
fornia, a country whose designation was taken from the name
of an island in a Spanish romance, described as full of gold and
gems, was explored by expeditions sent out by Cortez from
Mexico. Three centuries later, the omen contained in the name
California was to receive fulfilment by the discovery of rich
auriferous deposits. In 1542 Cabrillo sailed along the Pacific
coast as far north as the present Oregon, and in 1582 Santa Fe,
the second oldest town of the United States, was built in New
Mexico. The French explorers will be dealt with when our
record arrives at the coming conflict, as waged on American soil,
between the two great European rivals in the eighteenth century.
The natives of this newly-discovered continent were called
" Red Indians" from their coppery hue of skin, and, apart from
the Eskimos (Esquimaux) of the far north, were found to be,
in all their differences of character and mode of life, essentially
one type of mankind. Tall, erect, and strongly built frames; high
cheek-bones; deep-set, black eyes; coarse, straight, black hair;
prominent noses, were their physical marks. The American
Indian, in his native condition, was serious; reserved in manner;
proud; brave, and therewith cautious; hardy against bodily pain;
kindly to strangers; given to cruel revenge for wrong. War
and hunting, in which acuteness of sight and hearing were of great
service, formed the chief employments of Indian "braves". In
council they have been credited with a taste and talents for
eloquent speech. Their religion involved a general belief in one
Supreme Power, with minor spirits, good and bad: the expectation
of a future life, with its " happy hunting-grounds " for the good,
is well known. A superstitious regard for the incantations and
juggleries of impostors called " medicine-men " presented a lower
form of ideas concerning the natural and spiritual worlds. Few
of the native tribes ever emerged from the savage state, the chief
exceptions being the Aztecs of Mexico and the peoples of Central
America and Peru. The principal families of American Indians
were the Athabascans of Alaska and northern Canada; the Algon-
quins, who once lived from Labrador southwards to Virginia, and
westwards to the Rocky Mountains, and included the Delawares,
the Chippeways, and many extinct tribes; the Iroquois, a former
warlike race of the valley of the St. Lawrence; the Dakotas,
THE NORTH AMERICAN COLONIES. IO3
about the upper Mississippi; with smaller divisions, well known
from backwoods, frontier, and colonial records as Blackfeet, Paw-
nees, Cherokees, Comanches, and other names dear to the youthful
readers of " Indian" books.
CHAPTER II.
THE NORTH AMERICAN COLONIES TILL THEIR SEPARATION
FROM BRITAIN.
Britain begins her colonial dominion — Sir Walter Raleigh — Colonization of Virginia by
the London and Plymouth Companies — The slave-trade introduced — The " Pilgrim
Fathers"— Birth of " New England"— The Dutch claim " New Netherland"— End
of Dutch sway — The Thirteen Colonies — General Oglethorpe's emigration plans —
Progress of the colonies — Their differences in social character — The quarrel with
Great Britain — Attempt to impose taxes — Faneuil Hall and Boston Harbour —
Beginning of the Revolutionary War — General Washington — Surrender of General
Burgoyne at Saratoga — Surrender of Lord Cornwallis — Paul Jones and the privateers
— Independence acknowledged by Britain — Constitution of the United States — The
first president and first ambassador — Progress of the cotton cultivation.
It was in the later Tudor days and in early Stuart times that
Britain fairly began to found a colonial dominion, and to have her
people living on both shores of the Atlantic. In religious dissension,
in the desire for extended trade, and in other sources of action, the
causes and motives of emigration are to be discovered. Under Eliza-
beth, Sir Walter Raleigh, soldier, mariner, poet, courtier, prose writer,
scholar, and gentleman-adventurer, made vain attempts to found
settlements in the great undefined territory called, from the un-
wedded queen, "Virginia". The art of smoking tobacco was the
solitary trophy of Raleigh's enterprises in North America, but he
had shown the way for later efforts. The matter was taken in
hand by trading corporations, and early in his reign, James the
First gave charters for the colonization of Virginia to the London
Company and the Plymouth Company. The London merchants
were to have the region between the 34th and 38th degrees of
latitude; the men of Plymouth were to be masters of the soil, in
what was then styled " North Virginia", between the 4ist and 45th
degrees.
In 1607 a colony sent out by the London Company made
at Jamestown, on the river named in honour of the king, the
IO4 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
first permanent British settlement in what is now the United
States. The fleet of three ships, of 100, 40, and 20 tons, carrying
one hundred " adventurers ", had sailed from Blackwall in Decem-
ber, 1606, and reached Chesapeake Bay in the following April.
Famine and fever destroyed half the colonists during the summer,
and then occurred the romantic adventure of Captain John Smith,
one of the council under the charter. Brought as a prisoner before
the Indian chief, Powhatan, and saved from death by Pocahontas,
his daughter, he was allowed to return with supplies of food to his
fellow-settlers, and became, through his energy and wise conduct,
the saviour of the colony from extinction. There is good evidence
to show that a main object of the managers of the London Com-
pany was to spread Christian doctrine and civilization among the
natives. These founders of Virginia represented the Church of
England, and were careful to select emigrants of good character,
and men trained in all kinds of trades and crafts, who should
steadily work for the benefit of the community. In 1609 a second
charter was granted to this South Virginia Company, extending
their limits to two hundred miles north and south of the James
River, and Lord Delaware, a man of energetic character, was
appointed governor. Some hundreds of fresh emigrants went out,
carrying large supplies of stores, and these new settlers, with Lord
Delaware at their head, arrived just in time to save the colony
from ruin due to attacks of the Indians, and to famine and
disease. The settlement had to contend with many difficulties,
but it prospered by degrees, and the colonists were soon
engaged in the growth of the tobacco which was to become so
famous in later days, and a main source of wealth to Virginian
planters. As regards government, at first control was given to a
London council appointed by the king, with a local body to manage
affairs, the people having no choice in the matter. A third charter,
in 1612, abolished the London council, and placed power in the
hands of the stockholders. In 1619 Governor Yeardley called
together an assembly at Jamestown, composed of the governor, the
local council, and deputies or "burgesses" from the various planta-
tions or " boroughs". This was the first legislative body that ever
assembled in America. Its laws required ratification by the com-
pany in London, but on the other hand, orders sent from London
were not to be valid without confirmation by the colonial assembly.
v BRITISH
COLONIES
South of"
CANADA
To 1783.
THE NORTH AMERICAN COLONIES. IO5
In 1621 these privileges were embodied in a written constitution,
the first document of that kind seen in America. South Virginia,
in accordance with the advance of public spirit in Britain, was thus
becoming a nursery of freedom for men of European birth. In
1624 the company was dissolved, through King James' jealousy of
the steps taken towards self-government, and the colony became a
royal province, with a governor and council appointed by the king,
but with the retention of the colonial representative assembly. An
element of evil, which was in later times to be developed into vast
proportions, with terrible issues in civil strife, had arisen in 1619,
when a Dutch trader came into port and sold twenty negroes to
the colonists. Their labour was found so valuable in the growth
of tobacco, with which the very streets of Jamestown were at one
time planted, that large cargoes of " black ivory ", in the slave-
dealers' slang, were soon imported, and the banks of the James
River were lined with plantations for many a mile. The taste for
tobacco was rapidly growing in England, and in Stuart times pro-
tective laws, aimed at the Spanish trade in the herb denounced by
James the First, were passed to support the Virginian growth.
The Plymouth or North Virginia Company, of west-country
merchants and gentlemen headed by Chief-justice Popham, wholly
failed in attempts to found a colony in the district assigned to them
by charter. That part of America was reserved by destiny for
settlers of a very different class.
Pursuing for a time the fortunes of Virginia, we find the
colony suffering from the Navigation Act of 1660, restricting
her trade to English ships, and confining her export of tobacco
to dealings with England. The house of assembly was chiefly
composed of " royalists ", who carried matters with a high hand,
levied heavy taxes, narrowed the franchise, and persecuted Non-
conformists. There were thus two parties, the aristocratic, com-
prising office-holders, royalists who had fled from England under
the Commonwealth, and wealthy planters; the democratic, made
up of the smaller traders and the working class, who saw them-
selves deprived of political rights. In 1676 Virginia was afflicted
with an Indian war, followed by an armed civil struggle, in
which a young lawyer named Nicholas Bacon headed the demo-
crats against Governor Berkeley. The capital, Jamestown, was
burned, and all that now remains of the place is the crumbling
IO6 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
tower of an old church, almost hidden by shrubs, with tall trees
waving above some weather-marked tombstones of the churchyard
in the rear. The death of Bacon in the hour of success left
Berkeley free to exercise a revenge on the patriotic party which
aroused the disgust of Charles the Second, and caused his recall.
In 1679 Lord Culpepper became governor, and aristocratic rule
was restored. The franchise was confined to freeholders and
householders. The assembly could be summoned solely by the
Crown, and could deal only with measures drafted by the governor
and council, and approved by the Crown. The legislative body
had, however, the sole right of initiating money-bills.
The "Pilgrim Fathers" derived their name from the wanderings
undertaken in search of religious freedom. Some Puritan " Separa-
tists", of the Brownist or Independent sect, had quitted Scrooby,
in Lincolnshire, for Holland, in 1608, driven from their homes by
the action of the laws against nonconformity. They settled at
Leyden, with John Robinson as pastor, and their numbers were
reinforced by brethren arriving from other parts of England. In
July, 1620, about half their body, desiring to find a home for their
children in a land free from the contaminating influences of old-
world civilization, sailed from Delfthaven in the Speedwell. On
August 5th, with a few emigrants from England, one hundred and
twenty persons sailed from Southampton on board the Mayflower,
of 1 80 tons, and the Speedwell. Driven first into the Dart and
then into Plymouth by stress of weather, they condemned the
Speedwell as an unseaworthy vessel, and at last, on September 6th,
1620, the party of pilgrims, seventy-four men, twenty-eight women,
and a number of children, started from Plymouth in the Mayflower,
and reached Cape Cod in November, a long way north of the ter-
ritory assigned to the Virginia Company. A covenant to obey all
laws enacted by the males of the community in council was signed,
and John Carver was chosen as governor. An exploring party under
Miles Standish, after losing rudder, mast, and sail in a furious storm,
placed foot ashore on " Forefathers' Rock ", at the place called
New Plymouth, from the port of departure in the motherland. Their
companions in the Mayflower ratified the choice of a spot for
settlement, and New England thus began to exist. The colony
suffered so severely in the first winter that half the number, includ-
ing Carver, died, but the rugged character of the new-comers matched
THE NORTH AMERICAN COLONIES. IO/
the climate, and they were, happily, received as friends by the
Indians. There was no royal charter to interfere with freedom,
and the settlers were from the first a self-governed community. A
church and fort were erected, and these, with the houses, were sur-
rounded by a stockade. New emigrants came out from England,
and land was assigned to each household for the growth of corn.
In five years' time they were in a position to sell produce to the
Indians. In 1633 the colonists had paid off all the debt to the
Company in London which had fitted out the party in the May-
flower. In 1643 they numbered as many as three thousand souls.
The colony of Massachusetts dates from a royal charter granted
to a Company in 1629, allotting land in proportion to investment,
and leaving the government to a head and council resident in the
settlement. Nearly a thousand emigrants, including many influen-
tial Puritan families, went out, and founded settlements along the
shore of Massachusetts Bay. Governor Winthrop, in 1630, began
to build the town of Boston, which became the capital so famous
in later days. Very strict discipline, in moral and religious affairs,
was maintained in the new colony, and no small amount of bigotry
was shown. Church membership was needed for the possession
of civil rights. Witches were sought out, and " heretics " were
banished. Two members of the council were sent back to England
for the crime of using the Church prayer-book, and in 1635, Roger
Williams, an eloquent young minister, was driven out for asserting
freedom of conscience in certain matters, and, taking refuge among
the Indians, he founded a settlement named Providence. Quakers
were fined, whipped, imprisoned, banished, and even hanged, but
cruelty produced its natural effect of arousing sympathy for sufferers
and disgust against persecution, and by degrees the rigour of the
bigots was relaxed.
Connecticut was founded under the auspices of a Company
which included Lord Say and Sele and Lord Brook, who re-
ceived from Lord Warwick, the president of the " Council for
New England", in London, a tract of land in the valley named
from its chief stream, Connecticut, in the Indian tongue meaning
" Long River". In 1635 bodies of emigrants went out, and after
disputes with the Dutch, who claimed the territory, they founded
the town of Hartford, and secured their position by a fort estab-
lished at the mouth of the river. Many settlers from New Plymouth
108 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
and Massachusetts, attracted by the rich meadow-lands, joined the
new colony.
The progress of Virginia at this time may be estimated by
the fact that the plantations extended about seventy miles in-
land, and exported abundant supplies of corn to the settlers
further north. The spirit of the Puritan founders of Connecticut
is seen in their attitude towards the natives. The Indians were
regarded as mere foes by those who " claimed to be the divinely-
favoured conquerors of a new Canaan". In 1637 the Pequod
tribe, who had attacked the new-comers, was utterly destroyed, men
women, and children, after an assault upon their palisaded fort,
which was set on fire. Most of the natives perished in the flames,
and the few that could flee were hunted down to annihilation in
the river-swamps. The other tribes took the alarm, and in fear of
a combined Indian assault, the colonists of New Plymouth, New-
haven (a settlement founded in 1638 by some wealthy London
families), Massachusetts, and Connecticut formed a federation, the
first of its kind in America, styled " The United Colonies of New
England ". The civil troubles then raging in Britain left them
unfettered by home control, and while they were nominally subject
to England, these northern colonies were, from the first, to a large
degree independent. At this time the population of Massachusetts
had risen to nearly 30,000, and the other New England settle-
ments contained over one-third of that number. In 1638 the Rev.
John Harvard, a graduate of Emmanuel College, Cambridge, who
had settled in New England, bequeathed a noble gift of books and
money to the college being founded by the general court of Mas-
sachusetts at Newton, afterwards called Cambridge, on the river
Charles, and now virtually a suburb of Boston. The place had
been settled in 1630. In 1639 the first printing-press in America
was there set up by Day, a printer brought out from London by
Joseph Glover, a Nonconformist minister. The new Cambridge
soon became famous for its publications, producing in 1640 the Bay
Psalm-book, the first book printed in the British American colonies.
It has since acquired world-wide renown as the abode for many
years of Longfellow, in a house once occupied by George Wash-
ington, and as the seat of the noble institution of learning known
as the Harvard University.
The origin of Rhode Island colony is seen in the settlement of
THE NORTH AMERICAN COLONIES. IOQ
Providence, founded as above by Roger Williams, the pioneer in
those parts of religious freedom. The soil was fertile, and the
place " offered a refuge from the spiritual tyranny of Massachu-
setts'*. The island of Aquiday or Aqueduck, called by the Dutch,
from the colour of its soil, " Roode " (Red) Island, was occupied,
and hence arose the name of the new settlement. A charter was
obtained from England, after the victory of the Parliament in the
Civil War, and in 1647 tne people met to choose their governor
and other officials, and to frame laws granting freedom of faith and
worship to all. This was " the first legal declaration of liberty of
conscience ever adopted in the Old or New World ".
Returning for a moment to Virginia, we find that, in 1647, the
colony contained some 15,000 Englishmen and some hundreds of
slaves, with many thousands of cattle and other stock, and an
abundant growth of wheat, tobacco, and maize or Indian corn.
The James River had anchored in her waters at one time nearly
three dozen ships from London, Holland, Bristol, and New Eng-
land. On the execution of Charles the First, Virginia, now con-
taining, as we have seen, many royalist refugees, acknowledged
his son as Charles the Second, "King of England and Virginia",
while the colonies of New England adhered to the cause of the
new republic established at home.
The list of the New England states is completed in New Hamp-
shire, a feeble settlement founded by a man named John Mason,
and called after his native English county. From time to time
this territory was united to, and again separated from, Massachu-
setts, either by the consent of the people or by royal authority.
In 1741 the colony became "a royal province", and so remained
until the final separation from Great Britain.
In 1652 Virginia was forced, by the arrival of an expedition,
to submit to the Commonwealth, with an indemnity for the past,
and with the sole right of taxation vested in her own Assembly,
a most important arrangement in our view of coming events.
The Assembly was also to elect all officials. In the same year
Boston erected a mint, and began to coin silver in shillings, six-
pences, and threepenny pieces. In 1656 many settlers from New
England migrated to Jamaica, newly conquered by Cromwell
from Spain. In 1660, on the Restoration, a "Council for the
Plantations" was created in London, and the New England
IIO OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
colonies recognized the authority of Charles the Second, who
thereupon granted a charter to Massachusetts, including a con-
stitution with full legislative and executive power within the
colony, provided their Acts were not at variance with the laws
of England. Charters were also given to Connecticut and Rhode
Island. The Navigation Acts of 1661 and 1663, allowing the
imports and exports of the colonies to be carried only in Eng-
lish vessels, and further restricting trade, severely affected the
commerce of the now thriving Massachusetts. Much discontent
arose, and the colony defied the provisions of the Acts in trading
direct with the West Indies. In 1686 James the Second, carrying
out a plan formed by his predecessor, placed the government of
Massachusetts in the hands of a President and Council, devoid of
power to make laws or to impose taxes. No representative assem-
bly was to exist, and the abode of freedom was thus subjected to a
stern despotic sway. This final effort of Stuart tyranny was swept
away by the Revolution of 1689. The troubles of past years had
included a war in 1675, against the Indian " King Philip". Many
towns in Massachusetts and other parts of New England were
burnt, and the struggle lasted till the end of 1676, when Philip
was defeated and slain.
The colonies now to be dealt with were partly acquired by
conquest. The Dutch, in some parts of the New World, had
been beforehand with their European rivals in maritime affairs.
Captain Henry Hudson, whose name survives in a strait, a grand
bay, and a noble and beautiful river, was an English navigator in
the service of Holland. In 1609 he entered the harbour where
rfie " Empire City " was thereafter to stand, and sailed for one
hundred and fifty miles, in the hope of reaching the Pacific Ocean,
up the river to which his name was given. Such were the
European conceptions at that date of the shape and size of the
North American continent It was on this discovery that the
Dutch based their claim to possess the land stretching from Cape
Cod to the river Delaware, to which they gave the designation
o£ " New Netherland ". Their ships soon began to visit this
region for traffic in furs with the Indian hunters. In 1615 a
trading-post was formed on Manhattan Island, and a fort was
erected to the south of the present site of Albany. Their " West
India Company" made a permanent settlement at New Amsterdam,
THE NORTH AMERICAN COLONIES. Ill
and Protestant colonists were brought over from Belgium. Land
was purchased from the Indians, and the manors, of which some
still remain, were formed by possessors who, with their heirs, were
called "patroons". The records of the Dutch colony include
Indian wars, ruthlessly waged on both sides, disputes with the
British settlers on the Connecticut and with the Swedes on the
Delaware, and the doings of four governors, of whom the last and
ablest was Peter Stuyvesant. In 1664 the recapture, by the
famous Admiral De Ruyter, of settlements on the Guinea coast,
caused the seizure of many Dutch vessels in English ports, and
further retaliation was planned. Charles the Second granted New
Netherland to his brother James, Duke of York, and a fleet was
sent out to give effect to this bestowal. Brave old Stuyvesant
desired to resist, but he was a hater of free institutions, and many
of the Dutch had been seduced by the prospect of the self-govern-
ment enjoyed by their neighbours in Connecticut, and were strongly
inclined to make a trial of English rule. In September, 1664, the
English flag was hoisted on Manhattan, and the town and colony
were renamed New York, in honour of the new proprietor. The
English rulers, however, did not grant the desired rights, and in
1673, when England and Holland were again at war, a strong
Dutch squadron retook New York by surrender, and the place
was again held by Holland for a few months. The peace con-
cluded in 1674 restored the colony to Britain; and this was the
end of Dutch sway in North America.
They left behind them many marks visible to this day. Some
of the best families in New York city and state are of Dutch
descent The custom of New Year's Day visits, the children's
legend of Santa Claus at Christmas, the Easter coloured eggs, the
dough-nuts, or small round cakes of flour, eggs, milk, and sugar,
are all of Dutch origin. Washington Irving's History of New
York, ascribed to " Diedrich Knickerbocker ", a designation of
which the surname commemorates an early settler, is a masterly
piece of good-natured satire on the old Dutchmen of Manhattan
Island. The little man in knee-breeches and cocked hat, a per-
manent figure among literary portraits, gave his name to a favourite
style of masculine costume, and to the New York families whose
ancestors came out from Holland. The story of Rip Van Winkle,
the hero of another charming production of Irving, if it has not
112 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
been read in the original sketch, can never be forgotten by those
who have had the privilege of seeing Joseph Jefferson, one of
America's, nay, of the world's, greatest actors in his presentment-
beautiful in idea, most delicate in execution — of the good-natured,
worthless Dutchman who wanders to the woods of the Catskill
Mountains, falls into a deep slumber, and awakens, after a sleep of
many years, to find himself changed from a subject of George the
Third into a citizen of the United States, with his wife dead, his
beard grown a foot long, and new faces, buildings, and names all
around him on his return to his native village near the Hudson.
New Jersey, once forming a part of " New Netherland ", was
granted by James, Duke of York, in 1664, to Lord Berkeley and
Sir George Carteret, and derived its name from the largest of the
Channel Islands, where Carteret had been governor. It soon
became, by sale to William Penn, and by settlement, a Quaker
colony, and after union for some time with New York, was made
a "royal province" in 1738. It contained also many other Puritan
settlers, and Presbyterians who had fled from persecution in Scot-
land under Charles the Second.
Pennsylvania, destined to become one of the most important
territories, was founded by the famous Quaker, William Penn, son
of the admiral who captured Jamaica. In payment of a debt due
from the Crown the younger Penn received from Charles the
Second, in 1682, a grant of the territory lying between New Jersey
and Maryland, west of the Delaware. The woody region took
its name from the founder and the Latin word for " forest ".
Penn wished to secure a place of refuge for his persecuted brethren,
and applied, from the first, in his new colony the principles pro-
fessed by the Quaker sect. Two thousand colonists, despatched
in the first year, founded as capital the town of Philadelphia, em-
bodying the Greek for "brotherly love". The code called "The
Great Law ", drawn up by a legislative body of settlers, required
all voters and office-holders to be professors of the Christian faith :
apart from that, all Deists were left free to their own religious
profession. Penn's kindly words and demeanour at once gained
the hearts of the Indians, at an interview, ending in a treaty, held
beneath the foliage of a great elm-tree, which, carefully preserved
until 1810, was then blown down, and has its site marked by a
monument. It is the boast of the peaceful sect who object to
THE NORTH AMERICAN COLONIES. 113
oaths that this, the only treaty not sworn to, was the only treaty
never broken. Love begets love, and, amidst the internecine
conflicts waged between colonists and natives, the Indians never
shed the blood of a single Quaker.
Delaware was composed of three counties on the lower course
of that river, which broke off from Pennsylvania after the founder's
return to England. Penn allowed their action, and granted them
a separate assembly, but the two colonies remained under one
governor until the revolt from the British crown.
All the states to the south, lying between Chesapeake Bay and
Florida, were formed out of the original extensive " Virginia ", and
were mainly, in religion, attached to the Anglican Church, and in
social and political matters were aristocratic in tastes and form of
rule.
The foundation of Maryland takes us back to the year
1634, when Charles the First granted to Cecil Calvert, Lord
Baltimore, a Catholic, a grant of land in Virginia. The noble-
man's object was to find a place of free worship for his brethren
who suffered persecution in England. A body of emigrants settled
at an Indian village near the mouth of the Potomac, and the colony
had its name from the queen, Henrietta Maria. The yield of corn
from the virgin soil was so rich that the growers could at once
export to New England. The charter gave all freemen a share
in legislation, and the assembly in 1649 passed a famous Toleration
Act, securing freedom of worship to all Christians. Armed civil
strife occurred at intervals, owing in one case to interference from
Virginia, and in another to the disgraceful conduct of a Protestant
majority in the assembly, who excluded the Catholics, and declared
them outlaws. After a long and varying struggle Maryland was
made a "royal province" in 1690, and the Church of England
became the established form of religion. The Catholics, with the
greatest injustice and ingratitude, were disfranchised in the very
territory which they had planted. Redress came in 1715, when
the fourth Lord Baltimore recovered the proprietary rights lost
to his predecessor, and restored the system of religious toleration.
North and South Carolina arose from a grant of 1663, whereby
Charles the Second gave to patentees, including Lords Clarendon,
Ashley, and Albemarle, the territory lying between Virginia and
the river St. Mathias, in Florida. The name was derived from
VOL. I.
114 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Carolus, the Latin form of " Charles ". The province was to be
directly subject to the Crown, with liberty of conscience for all the
people, the proprietors, in other respects, having absolute power
for making war and raising money by taxation. Some emigrants
from Virginia were already in the land, when settlers from England
arrived in 1670, and afterwards founded the city of Charleston.
The colony grew fast, from the fertility of the soil and the genial
climate, which attracted many Dutchmen from New York. Per-
secution in France drove thousands of Huguenots across the
Atlantic, where they proved to be, as elsewhere, most valuable
acquisitions, in their moral conduct, marked by charity and thrift,
their polished manners, and their political, artistic, and agricultural
skill. The mulberry and the olive were planted in a new soil, and
the descendants of these Huguenots furnished three presidents, in
the revolutionary time, to the Congress of Philadelphia.
Georgia, the last of the thirteen colonies, belongs alone, in its
origin, to the eighteenth century, having been founded in 1732, the
year of Washington's birth. Its name was given from the reigning
British king: its first settlement was due to the benevolent General
Oglethorpe, a man who had served on the Continent under Marl-
borough's famous friend and colleague, Prince Eugene. It was
when he was M.P. for Haslemere, a Surrey borough at that time,
that Oglethorpe planned a new American colony, as a place where
the debtors then leading a miserable and useless life in the noisome
jails of the period, might enter on a new course of profitable and
healthful toil. He also designed the provision of a refuge for
certain German Protestants who were suffering bitter persecution
from the prince-archbishop of Salzburg, and who were driven into
exile, to the number of thirty thousand, as described in Goethe's
famous story, Hermann und Dorothea. The sum of ten thousand
pounds was furnished by Parliament, and George the Second made
a grant of land. In 1733 the good general took out a body of
more than a hundred emigrants, and founded the town of Savannah.
Two years later he went out with a party of three hundred fresh
settlers, including John and Charles Wesley, who preached there
for a time. The Indians were conciliated by presents, and, better
still, by Oglethorpe's kindly spirit. One of their chiefs gave him
a buffalo's skin with the head and feathers of an eagle painted upon
it. His explanation was that the eagle signified swiftness and the
THE NORTH AMERICAN COLONIES. 115
buffalo strength, qualities displayed by the new-comers in flying
like birds over the vast sea, and in meeting hostile attacks. The
soft eagle's feathers represented love; the warm buffalo's skin was
a protection against cold. " Therefore," said the Indian, " love and
protect our families." Further emigrations brought over members
of the Church of the Brethren, a Protestant society, popularly
known as the Moravians, claiming to represent the old Bohemian
Brethren of the days of John Huss. These excellent persons gave
examples of a pure and gentle Christian life. A number of sturdy
Scottish Highlanders brought bone and sinew to the aid of the
new colony. In 1738 the general took out a regiment of six
hundred men, with whom he waged war against the Spaniards of
Florida. In later days, a declension from the primitive purity of
Georgian morals showed itself in the discontent aroused by regula-
tions which excluded rum and the use of slaves. The rum had
been exported from the West Indies in exchange for lumber and
other products of the colony, and the loss of this trade was a real
grievance. Oglethorpe left the colony finally in 1743, and nine
years later the surrender of the charter to the British government
made Georgia a crown colony until the final rupture.
The history of the thirteen Colonies, before the revolt, is mainly
one of peaceful progress arising from tillage, manufactures, and
trade. We find a spirit of independence shown in 1665, when the
settlement of New Plymouth " declined to permit the king a voice
in the appointment of a governor", and the " general court" of
Massachusetts successfully resisted the royal claim to hear, in the
courts at home, appeals from the colonial tribunals. At the same
time, Massachusetts owned nearly two hundred vessels, mostly
hailing from Boston. In 1671, Maryland lays a tax of two
shillings a hogshead on exported tobacco, a clear proof of increase
in that article of production. In 1687, the governor of New York
invites the Iroquois Indians " to bring their trade to Albany".
This powerful people was, at this time, harassing the French in
Canada, and it was prudent for an English colony to keep them on
friendly terms. The intellectual advance is shown in 1692 by the
establishment, under royal charter, of the Williamsburg College in
Virginia, endowed by government and by private funds, with a large
grant of land, and a duty of a penny per pound weight of exported
tobacco. In 1716, Yale College, named from its chief founder,
Il6 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Elihu Yale, was established at Newhaven, in Connecticut, and now,
as Yale University, has a high position among American seats of
learning, with schools for students in theology, arts, medicine, law,
and science. In 1699 the North American Colonies had probably
attained to a population of 300,000, of whom the bulk were found
in New England, Virginia, Maryland, and New York. About
one-sixth of the whole, or 50,000, were negro slaves, four-fifths of
whom belonged to the southern settlements, where the hotter
climate caused a demand for labour unsuited to whites. It is
significant of coming opinions and action on the great question of
slavery that, so early as 1705, the legislature of Massachusetts,
sitting at Boston, imposed a duty of ^4 a-head on every imported
negro.
Symptoms of coming trouble made themselves observed
in 1761, when the restrictions and duties placed on colonial
commerce by the English Board of Trade caused a large amount
of smuggling, and many evasions of the obnoxious Navigation
Acts. In the struggle against the French and their Indian allies,
ending in 1763, the men of different colonies, living under diverse
systems of rule, had been brought together, to fight side by side in
a common quarrel, and, with the better knowledge of each other
gained as comrades, the colonists laid aside provincial jealousies,
and learned the strength and helpful spirit of union. They had
been contending as one nation, apart from the mother country,
though they fought, in many cases, side by side with British troops,
whose officers caused much irritation by open contempt for the un-
skilled, however brave, colonial soldiers. A democratic spirit had
arisen in the use of self-government, and some of the colonies had
long been accustomed only to taxation voted by their own legis-
latures. A sense of freedom and independence was abroad, and
the people had grown conscious of their strength. Education had
much advanced, especially in New England, and seven other
colleges had followed the foundation of Harvard and Yale. The
chief industry was agriculture, but manufactures of hats, paper,
shoes, furniture, coarse cutlery, and cloth -weaving had been
developed in the northern colonies. A large coasting-trade existed,
and the bold fishermen of New England were prominent among
the whalers of Arctic seas. The chief mode of travel was on foot
or horseback, and by means of coasting sloops, though coaches
THE NORTH AMERICAN COLONIES. 1 17
called "flying machines", journeying in two days from New York
to Philadelphia, were introduced at the end of this period. A
postal system, of which Benjamin Franklin was one of the earlier
directors, was established for the whole country.
There were marked differences of social character and life be-
tween the peoples of the three different groups of colonies, and, in
political and military affairs, when the day of trial came, much
divergence of spirit was revealed. The colonists of New England,
who dwelt in Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Hampshire, and
Rhode Island, were largely Puritan : strict in morals, simple in life,
possessed of free and popular institutions, and of intellectual power
which was brilliantly shown in oratorical and literary effort, then
and in later days. From New England sprang America's most
original metaphysician, Jonathan Edwards, born in Connecticut, in
1 703, author of the Freedom of the Will, and founder of a school of
Calvinistic theologians. Daniel Webster, one of the most moving
of American speakers, was born in New Hampshire. Nathaniel
Hawthorne, the brilliant describer of early New England life, as
author of Twice-told Tales, The Scarlet Letter, and The House of
the Seven Gables, was of Salem, in Massachusetts. Longfellow
first saw the light in Portland, Maine, a state founded in 1820, and
forming, in 1 807, the year of the poet's birth, a part of Massachusetts.
Dr. Channing, the great preacher, liberal theologian, and opponent
of slavery, a graduate of Harvard, was a native of Rhode Island.
Emerson, the wise philosopher, lofty in spirit, quaint and delicate
in utterance, is one of whom Boston is justly proud. Motley, the
vivid and accurate historian of the Dutch Republic, was a man of
Massachusetts. The same state produced Bancroft and Prescott,
Oliver Wendell Holmes, and James Russell Lowell.
The Middle Group of colonies, New York, New Jersey, Dela-
ware, and Pennsylvania, had people of very mixed race. The
Dutch in New York, the Swedes in Delaware, German Protestants,
Huguenots, Welsh emigrants, with the other British settlers,
furnished many shades of social and commercial character. The
main occupations were mining and agriculture. There was, during
the war against Great Britain, a lack, at various times, of public
spirit and self-sacrifice in the cause. One famous politician,
Benjamin Franklin, won his renown as a citizen of Pennsylvania,
though he, like so many of the illustrious men above named, was
Il8 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
born in Massachusetts. New York glories in having given birth
to Washington Irving, a prince among essayists, admirable in
fiction, and in Spanish history and romance, most loveable of men.
The Southern Group, including Virginia, Maryland, North
Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia, were all nominally attached,
in religious faith, to the Anglican Church, and contained a popula-
tion which, in its upper class of large planters, was connected in
blood, as existing names show, with families of high standing in
the mother-country. There were large numbers of negroes and of
inferior whites, chiefly engaged in the cultivation, at this period, of
tobacco, to be followed, at a later date, by cotton. Three men of
high distinction, including one of the first rank in the world's
history, came forth from Virginia to aid the colonial cause in the
struggle for independence. Their names are George Washington ;
Thomas Jefferson, third president of the United States; and Patrick
Henry, a man of Scottish blood, the greatest of American orators.
The social life of these states differed widely from that which was
developed further north. Plantations took the place of populous
towns and villages, and every estate was a little kingdom in itself,
with a large slave population, including men of every trade, and
ruled by a proprietor who, in the main, was a just and generous
master. His house, often rich in costly furniture and plate, and
displaying a high degree of refinement and luxury in the mode of
living, was the scene of boundless hospitality to neighbours, and to
all well-conducted strangers arriving from other parts of the
colonies or from lands beyond the seas. A chief point of rivalry
amongst wealthy planters was the possession of fine horses, and
the English fox-hunter who might visit the southern colonies would
often be able there to enjoy the excitement of the chase, and listen
to the music of well-trained hounds in full cry. Apart from the
mansion of the owner would be seen the negro quarters, with their
poultry-yards and gardens, and the settlement was completed by
the great sheds for the " curing " of tobacco, the workshops for
smiths, carpenters, and other craftsmen, and the mills for grinding
wheat and maize. A pleasant picture of life in " Ole Virginny",
as the negroes styled the land, may be found in the noble fiction of
Thackeray which forms the sequel to his immortal Henry Esmond.
Such was the fine, flourishing, and promising colonial dominion
which the motherland was to see torn apart, by the colonists' own
THE NORTH AMERICAN COLONIES. 1 19
act, from her political embrace. The causes of the quarrel, remote
and immediate, were manifold. Some were of long, slow, and
pernicious growth and effect ; others took the form of exasperation
which produced instantaneous retaliation of explosive and disastrous
force. This history knows nothing of political party, Whig or Tory,
Conservative, Radical, or Liberal. The one thing certain, as to
the loss of the American colonies, is that, even assuming the
colonial subjects of George the Third to have been wholly wrong
on the principles involved in the disputes between them and the
Crown, the British king and ministers did not act according to
the saying of Marcus Aurelius, the wise and benevolent emperor
of Rome, which lays down that "a prudent ruler will not offend
the prejudices of his people, though he might wish they were
wiser". It is equally certain that, as in most quarrels, there were
faults on both sides. If there was provocation from the home
government, there was also selfishness on the part of colonists who
forgot the benefits lately conferred, at vast cost of men and money,
by their fellow-subjects in Britain. The capture of Quebec, and
the destruction of French power in America, with the maritime
superiority acquired by Great Britain, had left the colonists free
from all apprehension of danger both by sea and land. They were
thus no longer dependent, for their very existence, on the mother-
country, and they appear to have been somewhat hasty in showing
resentment for attempts to exact a small contribution towards the
cost of the struggle which had brought them a great, manifest, and
lasting advantage.
There had been efforts made, in the earlier part of the eighteenth
century, to obtain a revenue from the colonies, and many dis-
putes had arisen concerning schemes for colonial defence, and
methods of federal union amongst the different colonies. The
restrictions on colonial trade appeared, to the colonists them-
selves, to be part of a system devised and worked for the benefit
of the home merchants. They felt as if they were being treated,
in this respect, as a mere possession, as conquered people, though
the claim to interfere at all with any of their affairs was based upon
the fact that they were brothers and Britons, mainly one with
their fellow -subjects at home in blood, language, and religion.
The Navigation Acts had long been evaded in various ways,
notably in an illicit trade carried on by the colonists with South
120 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
America, whereby they obtained silver bullion in exchange for
timber and other produce^
In an evil hour, George Grenville, Chancellor of the Exchequer
and prime-minister in 1 765, began to read the despatches from the
colonies, which had long been habitually left unopened and dusty
in the pigeon-holes of the official whose business it was to manage
colonial affairs. Grenville discovered what was going on to the
detriment of the revenue, and, eager to pay off some of the
National Debt, which had increased, between 1748 and 1763, from
about seventy-five to one hundred and thirty millions, he resolved
to levy some taxation from the colonies. This able, intrepid,
pertinacious, and narrow-minded man had the highest notions
concerning the powers of Parliament, and was, in fact, a tyrant who
disguised tyranny under constitutional forms. King and subjects
alike were small, in his view, compared with the sacred House
composed of the people's representatives. He held that the
colonies could lawfully be taxed, and all that was lawful was also,
in the minister's view, not only expedient, but a laudable discharge
of duty to the state. The two great champions of the American
colonies against Grenville were the elder Pitt, soon to become
Earl of Chatham, and Edmund Burke. They took, however,
different grounds, Pitt holding that the colonial assemblies were
parliaments which alone possessed the right of taxation : Burke
thought that the British Parliament had the abstract right to tax,
but that it was expedient to consult the feelings of the colonists,
and request a voluntary, instead of demanding a legal contribution.
The colonists held to the principle of " no taxation without repre-
sentation".
In 1764 Parliament carried a resolution that it was "just
and necessary for a revenue to be raised in his majesty's domin-
ions in America for defraying the expenses of defending, pro-
tecting, and securing the same ". " Writs of Assistance ", or
warrants authorizing the British custom-house officers in the
colonies to search for smuggled goods, were issued, and aroused
great indignation at Boston, where James Otis, advocate-general of
Massachusetts, denounced them as " instruments of slavery on the
one hand and villainy on the other". In 1765 the Stamp Act was
passed, for levying duties in America by way of stamps on deeds
and other legal documents, newspapers, and pamphlets. The
THE NORTH AMERICAN COLONIES. 121
assembly of Virginia first publicly opposed the law, and Patrick
Henry, a brilliant and rising young lawyer, introducing a resolution
which denied the right of Parliament to tax America, took occasion,
amid cries of "Treason!" from several quarters of the House, to
remind George the Third of the fate of Julius Csesar and Charles
the First. John Ashe, speaker of the North Carolina Assembly,
told Governor Tryon, " This law will be resisted to blood and to
death." The houses of British officials were mobbed, stamps were
seized, prominent loyalists were hung in effigy, British manufactures
were "boycotted" by " Daughters of Liberty" wearing nothing but
hosiery made of home-spun yarn, and " Sons of Liberty" were
banded in resistance to the law.
In February, 1766, when the mild Lord Rockingham had
succeeded Grenville as prime-minister, the Stamp Act was repealed,
after nearly ^7000 had been expended in gathering a stamp revenue
of four thousand. At the same time a Declaratory Act was passed
asserting that Great Britain had the right and authority to make
laws binding upon the colonies and people of America in all cases
whatsoever. In 1767, under the Duke of Grafton as nominal
premier, Charles Townshend, Chancellor of the Exchequer, imposed
additional custom-dues in America on glass, paper, painters' colours,
and tea, in order to raise a revenue for the payment of the officials
appointed by the Crown. A fresh cause of quarrel was thus estab-
lished, and the government at home, anticipating resistance, carried
a Mutiny Bill, ordering the colonies to provide quarters and supplies
for the troops sent out to enforce the laws.
This ill -judging and menacing Act stirred violent indignation
in America. The New York legislature refused compliance, and
was suspended from its functions by another Act of the home
Parliament. The Massachusetts Assembly sent round a circular
urging the other colonies to unite for the redress of grievances,
and refused, on demand, to recall the letters. This legislative body
was then suspended by the Governor. In October, 1768, British
troops, under General Gage, entered Boston, and, on being refused
quarters, took possession of the State House. The British Parlia-
ment, early in the following year, denounced the action of the
Massachusetts Assembly, and requested the king to order the
Governor to send treasonable persons home for trial before a
Special Commission. About this time, the House of Burgesses in
122 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Virginia was dissolved by the Governor for condemning the pro-
posed transmission to England of persons accused of treason.
Swiftly now and surely, matters were thus drifting to the cataract
of civil war.
Lord North became prime- minister in 1770, and all the
American import-duties were repealed, saving the tax of three-
pence per pound on tea, which was maintained as a matter of
principle. The revenue from this source was only three hun-
dred pounds a year, but the government, in its "firm" attitude,
supported by the king, thus defied the colonial contention that the
home Parliament had no constitutional right to tax at all those who
did not send representatives to that assembly. There had already
been a small conflict between the troops of General Gage and the
citizens of Boston, in which three men were shot dead and eight
wounded by the soldiers, two of whom were tried and convicted of
manslaughter. An English revenue -schooner, which had run
aground in 1772, was destroyed by the people of Rhode Island.
In the following year, an ominous step was taken by the men of
Virginia, when the leading burgesses united the colonies by
appointing a committee to maintain correspondence and communi-
cation with them.
The final provocation given to the colonists was one of a
peculiar kind, in the shape of a favour conferred. The East India
Company was in financial difficulties when Lord North arranged
for them to get rid of a large quantity of tea lying in their London
warehouses, by permitting its shipment to America without pay-
ment of the English duty, then fixed at one shilling per pound.
The colonists, paying only threepence, would drink their tea
more cheaply than the people of England. The subterfuge aroused
hot indignation. New York and Philadelphia prevailed on the
captains of the tea-ships which arrived there to depart without
unloading their cargoes. At Charlestown, the tea was landed,
but no man would purchase it, and it lay in the cellars until it was
spoiled by damp. In Boston, as all the world knows, a party of
citizens, after a meeting held at the famous Faneuil Hall, since
called the "cradle of liberty", boarded the ships, in the disguise of
Indians, and blackened the surface of the harbour -waters by
emptying overboard some hundreds of tea-chests. The men of
Massachusetts, who headed the cause of freedom at the north, as
THE NORTH AMERICAN COLONIES. 123
Virginia led the way in the south, were further exasperated by
insults offered at the Privy Council, in London, to their repre-
sentative, Benjamin Franklin. The immediate effect of the
" Boston Tea Party", as it was styled in America, was that, early
in 1774, the British Parliament passed measures closing the port
of Boston, revoking the charter of Massachusetts, and providing
that persons accused of capital crimes should be sent for trial
either to England, or to some other colony than that in which the
offence was committed. The council of the colony was to be
chosen by the Crown, the judges nominated by the governor, and
the late rioters were to be sent to England for trial. The Virginia
House of Burgesses, for protesting against the treatment of Boston,
was again dissolved by the governor, but the leading citizens met
at the Raleigh Tavern, in Williamsburg, Virginia, and directed the
Committee of Correspondence to propose to the other colonies a
general congress.
The colonists were now divided into opponents of the crown as
"Whigs", and loyalists, called "Tories". The aspirants after
freedom took up the words of Patrick Henry, " Give me liberty or
give me death". Bodies of soldiers were formed by the "Whigs",
under the name of "minute men", as ready to act in arms at the
shortest notice. It is clear that but a spark was needed to explode
such a magazine. In September, 1774, a congress representing all
the colonies except Georgia assembled at Philadelphia, and agreed
upon a " Declaration of Rights", with the adoption of addresses to
the people of Great Britain and of the colonies. It does not appear
that the idea of independence was yet entertained. A protest
against standing armies, without popular consent, was made, and,
until the redress of grievances, it was resolved to abandon all
commercial intercourse with Great Britain.
Lord North, in 1775, began a policy of concession, which came
too late. The colonists were not to be taxed by Parliament, pro-
vided they taxed themselves with the approbation of the British
king and legislature. Before this news could reach America, the
battle of Lexington had been fought. In this running conflict, a
body of British troops, sent by General Gage to destroy military
stores at Concord, eighteen miles from Boston, was most severely
handled by the " minute men " of Massachusetts, and returned with
the loss of about three hundred men. One hundred Americans
124 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
had fallen, and the blood of the colonists was now at fever-heat.
Gage was hemmed in at Boston by twenty thousand men ; the
forts of Crown Point and Ticonderoga were taken, and on May
loth, 1775, the Congress of the Colonies met at Philadelphia.
The famous Olive Branch Petition to the British king was adopted,
but George refused to receive a document emanating from an un-
lawful assembly; he would not recognize a " Congress", but would
receive the submission of "Colonies". Washington, meanwhile,
had been appointed commander-in-chief of the colonial forces, and
the battle of Bunker's Hill, near Boston, though it was a defeat for
the Americans, greatly encouraged the colonies, whose untrained
men had killed or wounded more than one thousand choice British
troops at a cost to themselves of less than half the number.
The civil war had begun, and on July 4th, 1 776, the Congress at
Philadelphia adopted the renowned Declaration of Independence,
drawn up by a committee composed of Thomas Jefferson, John
Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Robert Living-
stone. The resolution was carried at two o'clock, while the streets
of Philadelphia were crowded with anxious people. In the steeple
of the old State House was a bell on which, by a happy coincidence,
was inscribed, " Proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all
the inhabitants thereof". When the glad tidings came from the
place of assembly, a boy, posted below by the ringer, clapped his
hands and shouted out "Ring! Ring!" The iron clapper did its
work; the streets rang with shouts of applause, every steeple took
up the peal, and the night drew on with blazing bonfires and
booming cannon, proclaiming to the world, as events were to prove,
the advent of a new nation. It would be an ungracious task to
pursue in detail the momentous contest, happily unique in British
history, which was now to be waged. Citizens of the United
States of America were, during the year 1892, visitors to the
number of eighteen thousand at the tomb of Shakespeare in the
grand old church of Stratford-on-Avon. There, and in the great
Abbey, "where so many enmities lie buried", the men and women
of two mighty nations meet on the common ground of associations
fraught with deathless interest and renown, and have long since
agreed to inter there all bitter memories of the past.
The chief reputation created during this conflict between the
mother-country and her daughter-states was that of Washington.
THE NORTH AMERICAN COLONIES. 1 25
This great man was descended from an Englishman, John Wash-
ington, who emigrated in 1657, and he was the eldest son, by a
second wife, of a substantial farmer in Westmoreland county,
Virginia. Born in 1732, he became, at an early age, a surveyor
by profession. As an officer of the Virginia militia, he soon took
the field against the French, showing high military qualities, but
without meeting the due reward of success. In 1754 he was
compelled, in command of his regiment, to surrender to a superior
force, and, in the following year, serving as a volunteer under
General Braddock, he was almost the only officer who returned
safe from the disastrous expedition against the French at Fort
Duquesne. By the death of his half-brother he became a wealthy
landowner, in the possession of the Mount Vernon estates and
plantations, and, as a member of the Virginia Assembly, he gained
the high regard of his fellow-colonists which caused his appointment
as their supreme leader in war at the crisis of their political history.
The real greatness of Washington corresponds, in one direction,
with that belonging to other heroic figures of the first rank in
history, such as Wellington and William of Orange. Indomitable
patience and resolution amidst difficulties which would have utterly
subdued a man of weaker soul carried him on to final triumph. He
rises to the highest point in the dark hours of defeat, and of the
dismay and discouragement which follow thereon. Contending,
with raw troops, against large bodies of British regulars, aided by
Hessians and other German hirelings, and, to the disgrace of
England, by hordes of savage Indians, he was often unable to
make head against the foe. Driven from New York, in 1776, by
Clinton, Howe, and Cornwallis, after the defeat of Putnam at Long
Island, and of himself at White Plains, he made his way to Penn-
sylvania, where he found himself heading a mere handful of ragged,
disheartened fugitives. Many leading colonists then turned ' loyal-
ists,' but Washington never for a moment lost heart. On the night
of Christmas, 1776, he crossed the Delaware, in a storm of sleet,
amid the dangers of drifting ice, with a picked force, routed the
Hessians at Trenton in the midst of their festivities, took a thousand
prisoners, slew their leader, and crossed back to his camp with the
loss of but four men, two killed in action, two frozen to death.
This brilliant feat kept with the colours crowds of men whose term
of service was expiring, and brought large numbers of recruits.
126 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
In the first days of 1 777, a masterly device, which deceived Corn-
wallis, gave Washington another victory at Princeton, and his con-
duct of affairs at this period is said to have won the highest praise
from Frederick the Great. The Pennsylvania campaign of this
year included a defeat for Washington at Brandywine, the loss of
Philadelphia, and another defeat of Washington at Germantown.
Then came the terrible winter passed by the American leader and
his beaten and disheartened troops at Valley Forge, north-west of
Philadelphia. In bitter cold, scantily clad and fed, shoeless, sick,
the men were sustained by the heroic courage of their general,
strong in the sublime faith inspired by the cause which he held to
be that of justice, and were ready to take the field in the spring
with the new hopes derived from the capitulation of Burgoyne in
October, 1777, and the adhesion of France.
The surrender at Saratoga, between Lake Champlain and New
York, where General Burgoyne, with nearly 6000 men, laid down
his arms to overwhelming numbers under General Gates, was one
of the decisive events of modern history. Franklin, already
renowned for his diplomatic skill, had been despatched to France,
and the chief European rival of Great Britain now acknowledged
the independence of the " United States ", a title assumed at a
Congress held in November, 1777, and sent out a fleet, with troops
on board, to help the " rebels " against King George.
In February, 1778, a bill was passed through the British Par-
liament, formally renouncing the claim to tax the colonies, and
naming commissioners to treat for peace. Lord North, however,
was again too late, for in that same month France concluded an
alliance with the new nation beyond the Atlantic. The Americans
would not now listen to any overtures which did not recognize their
political severance. It was in April of the same year that the
historic scene, recorded by the brush of the Boston painter, Copley,
in his ill-named " Death of Chatham ", occurred in the House of
Lords. The Duke of Richmond moved to recognize the indepen-
dence of the States, and the great British champion of colonial
rights, protesting with such vehemence as was left to his enfeebled
frame " against the dismemberment of this ancient and noble
monarchy", sank down in the fit which, a few weeks later, was
followed by his death in one of the most gloomy periods of the
fortunes of the land which he loved so well.
THE NORTH AMERICAN COLONIES. 127
During 1778 and the two succeeding years, the British troops
were often successful in the field, especially in the southern states,
and Washington himself was again defeated. In 1781 the persis-
tence of the leader and the faithful adherents of the American cause
was rewarded by a great and finally decisive success. On October
1 9th, at Yorktown, in the east of Virginia, Lord Cornwallis, with
about 7000 men, blockaded on land by Washington and the French
general La Fayette, and by a French fleet on the coast, held out
until his last cartridge was spent, and then had no resource but
surrender. It was felt by both sides that the end had now virtually
come. It was two o'clock in the morning when the momentous
news arrived at Philadelphia, and the people were awakened by
the watchmen's cry " Past two o'clock and Cornwallis is taken ".
The streets were soon thronged with joyous crowds, and Congress,
meeting at an early hour, marched in procession to the Lutheran
church to make thanksgivings for this glorious issue. On Sunday
at noon of November 25th, more than five weeks after the event
had occurred, the British cabinet received the ominous news.
Lord North, faithful to his king and to what he had held to be the
righteous cause, cried in his distress " O God! it is all over". He
had never uttered truer words than those.
The incidents of the war included successes for privateers who
were let loose by Washington on British commerce with disastrous
results. Five hundred ships were taken, and the famous Paul
Jones, of Scottish birth, commanding a vessel called The Ranger,
attacked Whitehaven, in Cumberland, in 1778, set fire to the ship-
ping, and plundered the Earl of Selkirk's mansion. In the following
year, on board of his 42-gun frigate, the Bon Homme Richard, he
threatened Leith, and, attacking a convoy of merchantmen in the
North Sea, he captured, after a most sanguinary fight, the British
war-sloop Serapis, off Flamborough Head. Her consort was also
taken by another ship of Paul Jones' little squadron.
Even after Yorktown, the Americans were in a position of
much difficulty, though the end of the struggle was well assured,
when their antagonist was faced in Europe by the forces of France
and Holland and Spain. The colonists, however, had lost all their
foreign trade; the currency was worthless; tillage and manufactures
had been neglected; countless villages and homesteads had been
burned. Charleston was held by the British for more than a year,
128 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
and Savannah and New York for about two years, after the
capitulation of Lord Cornwallis, and George the Third was still
resolved to continue the effort to conquer the " rebellion ".
The powerful and benignant influence of Washington was
needed to prevent disastrous quarrel between the army and the
civil powers, but the feeling of the British nation, with the resigna-
tion of Lord North in March, 1782, prepared the way for the
Peace of Versailles, in January, 1 783, acknowledging the thirteen
Colonies of America to be free, sovereign, and independent states,
and relinquished, for the British crown, all claims to the govern-
ment thereof, and to proprietary and territorial rights. The treaty
was signed, on behalf of the Americans, by John Adams, of Massa-
chusetts, Benjamin Franklin, of Pennsylvania, and John Jay, of
New York. The causes of success in a war waged by a people
numbering only two millions against the enormous odds of Great
Britain, with about ten millions (exclusive of Ireland) and an over-
whelming superiority in resources of every kind, must be sought
in the distance of the scene of action from the British base of opera-
tions, in the combination of powerful European foes with which
Britain was required to deal, and, above all, in the constancy, deter-
mination, and skill displayed, amongst much despondency of feeble
souls, and much traitorous ill-will to the colonial cause, by George
Washington, General Gates, General Greene, and other leaders
of their country's levies. Whatever the causes, whatever the
remoter issues were to be, right or wrong, for good or for evil, the
work was done, and a new nation was thus placed on the roll of
independent states.
As one immediate consequence of this great change in Ameri-
can affairs, many of the people who called themselves " United
Empire Loyalists" migrated from the United States into Canada
and adjacent territory, where they settled, to the number of about
forty thousand, on the banks of the St. Lawrence and the shores
of Lake Ontario, and in that part of Nova Scotia which was after-
wards called New Brunswick. Lands were assigned to them by the
British government, and a great impulse was given to the progress
of the territory which had been lately conquered from the French.
Soon after the conclusion of peace at Versailles, the army was dis-
banded, and Washington, after a solemn and affecting farewell to
his officers, retired to his estate of Mount Vernon, with the eulogies
THE UNITED STATES. 129
and thanks of the people whom he, beyond all others, had contri-
buted to make an independent nation.
The first business to be undertaken was the formation of a
system of rule, as to which men's minds were greatly divided.
The separate States were jealous of each other, and many people
were opposed to the formation of a national government, with
large powers vested in a Congress. A convention was called to
Philadelphia in 1787, with Washington as its president, and lengthy
deliberations ended in the adoption of a new constitution, which
came into operation two years later. The constitution of Great
Britain was the model chosen by the organizers of a system of
rule for the new power. The chief aim was to separate the
Executive, the Legislative, and the Judicial functions. In the
mother-country, the sovereign and the ministers were the execu-
tive department of administration. The legislative powers lay
with Parliament. The judges, during good behaviour, were inde-
pendent of both, and secure in their exalted and important
positions. The needful express provision for the circumstances
of the case in hand was that by which local powers were reserved
for the several States, who agreed to resign to a central authority
certain rights of action expressed in a strictly definite bond of
federal union.
In accordance with their pattern, thus modified, the President
became an elective sovereign, chosen for four years' tenure of office,
by electors chosen from each state in numbers proportioned to
population. These electoral delegates were supposed to represent
the flower of the citizens in wisdom and fitness to choose a tem-
porary ruler. In fact, they are themselves chosen as men who are
pledged to the support of one of the particular candidates, Demo-
cratic or Republican, already nominated by opposite parties. A
vice-president for four years is chosen in the same way. The
President's executive powers are those of a constitutional sovereign
in regard to peace and war, the issue of coinage and notes, but he
possesses and uses a power long become obsolete in Great Britain,
that of vetoing bills of Congress, unless they are passed by a two-
thirds majority in both houses. The Secretaries of State and other
ministers are selected by him ; they do not, like our Cabinet and
some other high officials, sit in the Parliament.
The House of Representatives, one branch of the legislature, is
VOL. I. 9
130 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
chosen by the people of each state, in numbers proportionate to
the population, and under a franchise of local regulation. The
Senate consists of members elected by the local legislatures of the
several States, two from each State, and they sit for six years, the
chamber being renewed by the biennial retirement of a third of
the members. The powers and privileges of these two bodies
resemble those of the two British Houses of Parliament; the Senate
being a republican " House of Lords ", with the right of judging
officers of state impeached by the House of Representatives. The
more popular body, as with us, has the sole right of introducing
bills for taxation. The judges hold office, as in Great Britain
since the Act of Settlement, " for life or good behaviour ". One
important restriction exists upon the power and validity of Acts of
Congress: they must be in accordance with what is laid down in
the written Constitution, and a judge may decide that an Act, or a
clause or section of an Act, is contrary thereto, and is thereby
annulled.
There could be but one man to whom the eyes of the American
people turned as the first President of the new republic, and Wash-
ington, inaugurated in that high office in April, 1789, was chosen
for a second term in 1793. He died in December, 1799, some
two years after the close of his second period of rule, leaving
the country mainly of his creation fairly launched on her grand
career.
Mr. Chauncy Depew, one of America's greatest living speakers,
delivering the Columbian oration at Chicago in October, 1892,
referred in proud terms of eulogy to the first century of his
country's history. He declared that " the constitution and govern-
ment of the United States had now passed the period of experi-
ment, after a hundred years of successful trial, and that their
demonstrated permanency and power were revolutionizing the
governments of the world. Anarchists and Socialists had taken
no root, and made no converts, on American soil. Religion had
flourished, and a living and practical Christianity was the charac-
teristic of the people. They had accumulated wealth far beyond
the visions of the Cathay of Columbus or the El Dorado of De
Soto". In describing the effects of the American experiment
upon the Old World, the orator claimed that " the sum of human
happiness had been boundlessly increased by the millions who had
THE UNITED STATES. 131
found new homes and improved conditions of life on the soil of the
New World, and that the returning tide of lesson and experience
had incalculably enriched the fatherlands whence these emigrants
issued. France was rudely roused from the sullen submission to
centuries of tyranny by her soldiers as they returned from service
in the American Revolutionary War. The orgies of the Reign of
Terror were the revenges and excesses of a people who had dis-
covered their power, but were not prepared for its beneficent use.
After fleeing from herself into the arms of Napoleon, France, in
the processes of her evolution from darkness to light, had tried
Bourbon, and Orleanist, and a Napoleon again, and had cast them
all aside. Now, in the fulness of time, and through training in the
school of hardest experience, the French people had reared and
were enjoying a permanent Republic. England of the Mayflower
and of James the Second, England of George the Third and of
Lord North, had enlarged her suffrage, and was to-day animated
and governed by the democratic spirit. The United States threw
wide her gates for, and gladly received with open arms, those who,
by intelligence and virtue, by loyalty and thrift, were worthy of
admission to the equal advantages and priceless gift of American
citizenship." Making all abatement for the natural pride of an
American citizen in the marvellous progress and wide-spread
influence of his country, we may fairly say that " this witness is
true".
We proceed to trace briefly the relations existing between the
mother-country and the United States in the period which followed
on the close of the Revolutionary War. When the struggle was
over, and the final separation was effected, the British king, who
had largely been responsible for the original quarrel, accepted the
position with an excellent grace. In receiving at St. James' the
first American ambassador, John Adams, George the Third, on
the arrival of the minister in 1785, addressed him thus: " I will be
very frank with you. I was the last to conform to the separation;
but the separation having been made, and having become in-
evitable, I have always said, as I say now, that I would be the
first to meet the friendship of the United States as an independent
power. Let the circumstances of language, religion, and blood
have their full effect."
132 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
It is idle to speculate on what would have happened if the
motherland had never quarrelled with her offspring. It is certain
that Great Britain quickly recovered from the shock received in
the loss of her colonies. The trade of the old country grew fast
along with the growth of prosperity in the new. The United
States, with her rich and virgin soil, soon acquired the means of
largely importing the manufactured goods poured into the market
by the workers in the British hives of industry. William Pitt
strove for perfect freedom of trade with the new republic, and,
though he failed in this effort, the commerce between the countries
soon attained proportions which had never yet been reached.
This was largely due to the cultivation of cotton, which was
successfully begun in the southern states during the War of Inde-
pendence. This valuable shrub, known from distant ages in
India, and brought thence into Egypt in the sixth century before
the Christian era, was introduced into Europe about the ninth
century, being planted by the Moorish conquerors of Spain in the
fertile plains of Valencia. Cotton factories soon arose at Cordova,
Granada, and Seville, and by the fourteenth century the cotton
stuffs of Granada were held to be superior even to the Syrian
fabrics. The making of cotton-cloth appears to have been prac-
tised by the Mexicans and Peruvians long before Europeans
arrived in the New World. The British colonists of Virginia
began to plant the cotton-shrub as an experiment in 1621, but the
amount of cotton produced was very small, and the first impetus
towards a large culture appears to have been given by the intro-
duction of new plants, at the time above-mentioned, from the
Bahamas into Carolina and Georgia. The invention of the cotton-
gin, in 1793, by Eli Whitney, a native of Massachusetts, was a
great event in the history of the United States. This machine
effected with ease and rapidity the separation of the fibre from the
seed, a process hitherto performed by hand with slow and toilsome
labour. The cotton was thus made ready for export at a lower
price, and a new source for raw material at a cheap rate was thus
laid open to British manufacturers.
POSSESSIONS IN EUROPE AND AFRICA. 133
CHAPTER III.
COLONIAL POSSESSIONS IN EUROPE AND AFRICA.
Early history of Gibraltar — Its acquisition by Britain — Attempts by Spain to recover
possession — Gallant and successful defence by General Eliott. — Gambia and the
Gold Coast — African trading companies — St. Helena — Sierra Leone.
We proceed to a historical record of the dependencies, settle-
ments, colonies, and foreign possessions of Great Britain, as they
existed prior to the opening of the nineteenth century. Geo-
graphical, commercial, and statistical accounts of the whole
Colonial Empire, with the mode of government obtaining in
each at the date of writing, are reserved for a later section of
this work.
Apart from the Channel Islands, the great rock-fortress of
Gibraltar was the only foreign European dependency of Great
Britain at the opening of the nineteenth century. This world-
famous promontory of the south of Spain was known to the early
navigators of Phoenicia. The Greeks gave it the name of Calpe,
and this hill on the northern side of the strait, and that above
Ceuta on the African coast, styled A by la, were the ancient Columns
or Pillars of Hercules, deriving that name from various forms of
a mythological story concerning the demigod, who either, in one
account, erected pillars at those points to mark the limit of his
travels to the west, or tore asunder the solid earth so as to make
the strait, and turn one mountain into two. The Columns of
Hercules were, for many ages, treated as the boundary of the
western world, beyond which lay the ocean-stream that surrounded
the flat disk of earth as conceived by men of olden time.
Gibraltar came within the range of mediaeval history, and re-
ceived its present name when the Saracens, whose conquering
arms had been carried along the northern coast of Africa, had
reached the western ocean. It was in the year 711 that one of
their leaders, Tarik, crossed the strait to undertake the conquest
of the Visigothic kingdom in the region afterwards known as Spain.
The great rock was by him furnished with a castle, of which one
old tower remains, and the position was held as one which afforded
a sound base of operations towards the north, and a point of safe
and speedy landing from the African side. The Arabic name of
134 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Gebel-el-Tarik, or Hill of Tarik, passed, by an obvious process
of corruption, into Gibraltar. In 1302, Ferdinand the Second,
king of Castile, won it back from its Moorish possessors. The
place, however, again changed hands, and only became firmly,
though not then finally, a Spanish possession in 1462. The rock
was then converted into a fortress of the modern type, mounted
with guns, and provided with various artificial works of strength.
The acquirement of Gibraltar was the sole permanent success
achieved by British arms in Spain during Queen Anne's War
of the Spanish Succession. The opportunity for its seizure was
afforded, through the gross neglect of the then degenerate rulers
of Spain, to a combined British and Dutch force, consisting of a
fleet commanded by Sir George Rooke and Sir Cloudesley Shovel,
carrying soldiers under the Prince of Hesse-Darmstadt. In the
last days of July, 1704, the Spanish garrison within the works
numbered only a hundred men. The chivalrous commander dis-
dained surrender even to odds so great, and a force of two thousand
marines, led by the German prince, was landed on the isthmus to
cut off supplies from the mainland of Spain. On August 2nd the
guns of the squadron opened fire, and, on the following day, after
further bombardment, the place was carried by an escalade of
British sailors on the precipitous eastern face of the rock, while a
part of the garrison were engaged in prayer at the festival of some
saint, instead of manning the works and guns. A simultaneous
attack on the south mole-head ended, after heavy loss to the stormers
from the explosion of a mine, in the capture of the ramparts in that
quarter, and the surrender of the post on honourable terms. The
English flag was at once hoisted by Sir George Rooke, though the
Prince of Hesse- Darmstadt wished to raise the Spanish standard
and to secure the fortress for " Charles the Third ", son of the
emperor Leopold, and titular king of Spain. Two thousand men
were left as a garrison, and, though the importance of the conquest
was not fully understood at the time, Gibraltar was retained, in
1713, by the terms of the Peace of Utrecht.
. The Spanish government had, from the first, severely felt the
loss of their southern stronghold, and two fierce attempts at repos-
session had been made in 1704 and the following year. In 1727,
when further trouble arose with Spain, an army under the Count
de las Torres attacked the fortress, and strove to fulfil their leader's
POSSESSIONS IN EUROPE AND AFRICA. 135
boast that in six weeks' time the " heretics " should be driven into
the sea. The British fleet kept the garrison well supplied with
food and ammunition, and a siege of four months, from February
till June, closed with the discomfiture of the assailing force, the
fire of whose guns had wrought little or no damage.
The last and by far the greatest attempt for the forcible recovery
of Gibraltar from British hands was made in the siege which con-
tinued from June 2ist, 1779, until March, 1783. In that dark
period of our country's fortunes, when the British fleets were
matched against the combined marine forces of France and Spain
and Holland, and British armies were unable to hold their own,
beyond the Atlantic, against colonial levies, the historic and suc-
cessful resistance of Gibraltar, one of the grandest achievements in
modern times, saved the country's honour, and nobly vindicated
our British claim to the possession of dogged valour and endurance
against immeasurable odds. The place was invested, on the land-
side, by a vast Spanish force, and lines of works, mounting many
scores of cannon, were erected for bombardment. The governor
and commander-in-chief, General George Augustus Eliott, headed
a garrison of five thousand men, a force including about one thou-
sand Hanoverians.
This brave man, then in his sixty-second year, was born on
Christmas-day, 1717, the seventh son of Sir Gilbert Eliott, a Rox-
burgh baronet. Wounded at Dettingen, and engaged at Fontenoy,
Eliott, as a colonel of light horse, had also served with the English
force aiding Frederick the Great, the first captain of that age,
against Austria in the latter half of the Seven Years' War. By a
happy choice, he was sent out to put Gibraltar in a state of defence,
for which purpose he was backed by about five hundred artillery-
men and engineers.
Towards the end of June, 1779, the place was cut off on the
side of Spain, and the friendly intercourse with the Spanish villages,
the excursions into the cork-forests, and the visits to the Barbary
coast, which had lent a charming variety to a life of garrison routine,
came to an end for the holders of the fortress. Their country's
fleets were hard beset even in the British Channel, and, at an early
period of the investment, the supplies of fresh food, in corn, fruit,
and meat from the African coast, were made difficult of arrival
through the presence of Spanish ships in the bay. The people of
136 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
the town of Gibraltar, lying at the foot of the rock on the western
side, had neglected the order to keep always in hand a store of
provisions for six months' consumption. They were destined, in
due time, to pay dearly for this disregard of the dictates of common
prudence. The works of the fortress could scorn the earlier bom-
bardments from the Spanish lines, but within a few months of the
commencement of the blockade there were serious menaces of
famine. In the earliest days of 1780, the wives and children of
officers and troops were partly living on the wild herbs that grew
on the face of the Rock. In that same month of January, Rodney's
victory over the Spanish fleet near Cape St. Vincent brought relief
by ending the sea-blockade, and throwing into the place a large
store of provisions. The garrison was also reinforced, and the
troops could face the enemy with renewed hopes of final success.
In June, 1780, the besiegers failed in an attempt with fire-ships
against the British squadron. As month after month wore away,
the thoughts of the whole civilized world were turned upon the
rock-fortress, beleaguered in vain, while the flag of Great Britain
still proudly floated above its batteries and corridors, hewn out by
man from the solid stone. The first inquiry of Charles the Third
of Spain, as he awoke to the light of a new morning, was, "Is It
taken?" At a later stage, the Queen of Spain had her seat placed
upon a lofty hill still called " The Queen's Chair", and vowed that
she would never move from the spot until the English flag was
lowered. Her release was brought about by General Eliott's
courtesy in striking his colours, on this understanding, for a few
hours.
In the autumn of 1780, the continued use of salt provisions
caused a terrible outbreak of scurvy, relieved at last by the capture
of a Danish vessel with a cargo of lemons and oranges. The value
of lemon-juice, which had recently been proved by Captain Cook,
as a specific for the scourge of mariners in those days, was quickly
demonstrated anew in the hospitals of Gibraltar. The want of food,
partly arising from the Sultan of Morocco's churlish prohibition of
trade with his ports, was again creating severe distress in the spring
of 1781. The soldiers and the townsfolk were well-nigh starving
when fresh relief arrived. In April, Admiral Darby forced away
the blockading ships, and brought in a convoy of a hundred vessels
laden with stores. The baffled besiegers, now Spanish and French,
POSSESSIONS IN EUROPE AND AFRICA. 137
at once began a severe bombardment from their works to the north,
and from gunboats in the bay, laying the town in ruins, but making
slight impression on the batteries of the fortress or on the fighting
strength of the garrison. Through May and June their fire was
maintained, and the powerful siege-works received daily additions
of a formidable kind.
It was in the last week of November, 1781, that the gallant
Eliott resolved to show his enemy that the troops under his com-
mand could strike outside as well as from within the shelter of their
stronghold. At sunset of the 26th, Brigadier Ross led a sortie of
two thousand men against the hostile lines at the distance of three-
quarters of a mile. The foe were taken completely by surprise,
and fled in panic, leaving the British to work their will on the
captured works. The pioneers and artillerymen quickly destroyed
the thick and lofty ramparts; the gabions and wooden gun-plat-
forms were set on fire, and in half an hour the flames consumed all
the wood-work in the lines. The cannon and mortars were ren-
dered useless by spikes driven into the touch-holes, the magazines
were blown up, and the assailants retired with a loss of only thirty
men, after destroying, in one hour, works which had cost three
millions sterling for construction, and the lives of five thousand
men from the British fire. All efforts at renewal were foiled by
Eliott's discharge of red-hot shot, maintained until the whole of the
advanced works were again destroyed. During the remainder of
that year, and the spring of 1782, the blockade continued, with
daily firing from the Spanish gunboats and from the batteries on
land.
The approach of peace urged the enemy to a final and desperate
attempt at recovering the great fortress for the crown of Spain.
The native army numbered nearly thirty thousand men, and in
September, 1782, the Due de Crillon, fresh from the conquest of
Minorca, was in command of a yet larger French army. The
chief war-engineers of Europe had been invited, by large rewards,
to furnish plans for the reduction of Gibraltar in a combined attack
by sea and land. The method devised by the Chevalier d'Arcon
was adopted with eager hopes of success. In the port of Alge9iras,
on the opposite side of Gibraltar Bay, ten large ships were cut
down, and turned, at a great cost, into floating batteries of very
ingenious, peculiar, and formidable construction. In order to make
138 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
them, as it was fondly believed, proof against fire and the risk of
submersion, these great engines of war were surrounded with raw
hides, backed by thick layers of wet sand, and were furnished with
bomb-proof roofs, and with large quantities of the cork abounding
in the Spanish forests.
Eliott, for his part, prepared his furnaces, which were placed in
all parts of the defensive works. The French and Spanish fleets,
which had been menacing our coasts in the Channel, had come
southwards to share in the final effort, and the government at home
ordered Lord Howe to equip his fleet at Portsmouth for the relief
of Gibraltar. It was at this time, on August 29th, 1782, that the
magnificent Royal George, of 108 guns, sank at Spithead with
Admiral Kempenfeldt on board. On September nth, Howe
sailed from Spithead with a powerful naval armament, having on
board two regiments to strengthen the garrison, and convoying
many transports laden with stores. Before he could arrive on the
scene of action, the fate of Gibraltar had been decided by British
valour, energy, and skill. The hostile bombardment began on
September 8th, and was vigorously sustained for a week. On
the 1 3th, the terrific storm of red-hot shot, shell, and cold cannon-
balls, kept up from the fortress with accurate aim, completed its
work of triumphant repulse. The towering Rock, the bay of
Gibraltar, the waters of the Strait, the African shore, were illumi-
nated by the flames of the "incombustible" floating-batteries, and
British soldiers were soon employed in saving the panic-stricken
crews of the foe. The sun rose upon a scene of utter destruction,
and the arrival of Lord Howe on October i ith drove off the
French and Spanish fleets, while his supplies of men and food
placed the noble garrison beyond all risk from within or from
without.
The siege, now practically over, was continued, in a languid
fashion, during the winter, and ended with the peace of 1783, after
a continuance of three years and seven months. The total loss of
the garrison was but twelve hundred men, of whom less than five
hundred perished or were disabled by the enemy's fire. From that
hour Gibraltar has remained a British possession. Her defender,
who ranks, for combined skill, intrepidity, and moral courage,
among the greatest soldiers of his century, was ennobled as Lord
Heathfield, a title derived from his Sussex estate, and Baron of
THE DESTRUCTION OF THE SPANISH "BATTERING
SHIPS" BY THE BRITISH AT GIBRALTAR.
The combined naval forces of France, Spain, and Holland sought to
wrest Gibraltar from Britain in a great siege which lasted from June, 1779,
to March, 1783. The chief war-engineers of Europe had been induced,
by large rewards, to furnish devices for the capture of the fortress, and the
floating batteries of the Chevalier d' Argon was the method finally adopted.
These batteries were built up from the frameworks of ten large ships, which
were surrounded with raw hides, and furnished with bomb-proof roofs.
They were supposed to be invulnerable and incombustible, but when they
were towed into position, the storm of red-hot shot and shell from Gibraltar
soon set them in a blaze. In a short time the panic-stricken crews jumped
overboard, and so this attempt, — like all the other attempts to reduce the
fortress held by Governor Elliot, — ended in complete failure.
( 5)
POSSESSIONS IN EUROPE AND AFRICA. 139
Gibraltar, with the further distinctions of the Knighthood of the
Bath, the thanks of Parliament, and a pension of ^1500 a year.
The earliest history of our African possessions takes us back to
the fifteenth century. The great river Gambia was discovered by
the early Portuguese navigators, but no settlement was made by
Portugal on that part of the west African coast. In 1588, the year
of the Armada, a charter for trade with the Gambia was granted
by Queen Elizabeth to some Exeter merchants, but nothing was
attempted, it seems, in the way of settlement until 1618, when a
Company was formed in London, and unsuccessful efforts were
made to open commercial relations with the natives. In 1664 the
post now called Fort James was built on St. Mary's Island, at the
mouth of the river, and a British hold on that region was thus
secured. During the eighteenth century, the chief trade of the
settlement was that in negroes, exported as slaves to the " planta-
tions" of America and the West Indies. The Treaty of Versailles,
in 1783, secured the Gambia trade for England, while France
received the sole possession of rights in the river Senegal, with
trifling reservations in each region, which were afterwards made
the subject of exchange between the Powers.
The Upper Guinea coast was visited by adventurous French
traders from Rouen and Dieppe in the latter half of the fourteenth
century, and the return of vessels with a fair amount of gold and
other produce aroused much interest. A settlement was formed
on shore at La Mine, afterwards called, by the Portuguese,
Elmina, and the place was duly provided with a church for worship,
and with forts for defence. The Portuguese arrived as colonizers
on the Gold Coast about 1483, when they occupied the abandoned
French post, and settled at various points in that region. They
held almost a monopoly of the Guinea trade for more than a
hundred years, though merchant ships from Bristol had arrived on
the scene about the middle of the sixteenth century. In the first
half of the seventeenth, the Dutch, now risen to a high point of
naval and commercial power and prosperity, ousted the Portuguese
from that quarter by the capture of their chief fort, and were soon
followed by their English rivals. In 1662, a Royal Company of
Adventurers was formed, and the Dutch and English were soon in
conflict. The settlements of Holland were taken by England, only
to be again lost, except Cape Coast Castle, to the famous De
140 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Ruyter. The trading company was soon dissolved, to be succeeded,
in 1672, by the Royal African Company, which erected forts, and
trading -posts or factories, at several points between Accra and
Dixcove. The works at Cape Coast Castle were strengthened,
and a good hold of the strip of territory was thus obtained. In
1 750 the Company was deprived of its charter, and its settlements
were transferred to a new African Company of Merchants, founded
by an Act, subsidized by the government, and invested with the
right of trading on the coast and of establishing posts between
twenty degrees of north and south latitude. Fighting with their
Dutch neighbours was a chronic trouble to the British traders until
the general peace of 1783.
The world-renowned islet of St. Helena was discovered, on St.
Helena's day, May 2ist, 1502, by the Portuguese naval captain,
Juan de Nova. It was at that time without human inhabitants,
and covered with thick forest. Its existence, or, at least, its
position, was kept as a strict secret from the other European
nations until its re-discovery by Thomas Cavendish in 1588. This
famous Elizabethan navigator, the second Englishman to sail round
the world, crossed the Pacific after a plundering expedition to the
Spanish possessions on the west coast of America, and on June Qth,
about three weeks after rounding the Cape of Good Hope, he
landed on the island. The crew of his vessel, the only survivor
of three which had sailed forth from Plymouth nearly two years
gone, were in grievous suffering from sickness, and found health
and refreshment from its pleasant fruits and herbs, planted there
by the Portuguese, and from the flesh of the swine and wild goats
that roamed in the woods and on the hills, and of the turkeys,
pheasants, and partridges that formed the fair region's feathered
game. The place was abandoned by the Portuguese to the Dutch,
who held it for some years, about the middle of the seventeenth
century, and then deserted the island in their turn. In 1651 it was
occupied by our East India Company, which was empowered, by a
charter of the year after the Restoration, to plant and fortify the
place. During the ensuing Dutch wars, it was twice seized by
Holland, but was finally retaken, in May, 1673, by Commodore Sir
Richard Munden, and was granted, by a new charter of Charles
the Second, to the East India Company, who remained its masters
until many years after the opening of the nineteenth century.
POSSESSIONS IN EUROPE AND AFRICA. 141
During all that period, its chief use lay in its convenient position
as a place of call, to procure fresh water, provisions, and fruit, or to
refit after damage, for ships on the homeward voyage round the
Cape. St. Helena is fairly placed in the middle of the South
Atlantic trade-wind, and in the direct route of ships returning from
Eastern seas.
Sierra Leone, or " Lion Mountain", named from the terrific roar
of the tropical thunder over its heights, was discovered in 1462 by
the Portuguese navigator, Da Cintra. Its British history dates
only from 1787, when the tract of land now partly occupied by
Freetown was given up by a native chief to an English society,
formed to help free and destitute negroes. The decision of Lord
Mansfield in 1770, recorded above, that no human being can be
detained as a slave on British soil, had thrown many of these
persons, abandoned by previous owners, on the streets of London,
Bristol, and other commercial towns. A cargo of these free
emigrants was sent out in 1787, and, four years later, a Company,
including Clarkson and Wilberforce, Thornton and Granville Sharp,
was formed, with powers secured by an Act. A large body of
negroes, quitting Nova Scotia for a land of more genial clime,
landed in the following year, and good hopes for the prosperity of
the new colony were formed by its benevolent promoters. In
1800, there was a fresh arrival of freed negroes from Jamaica, but
the settlement was not an entire success. Its later history will be
given in coming pages of the present work.
142 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
CHAPTER IV.
AUSTRALASIA — NEW SOUTH WALES.
Peculiar conditions of early Australian colonization — First authentic notices of Australia
or New Holland — Dampier surveys part of the coast — Captain Cook the first real
discoverer of the continent — The British flag hoisted in New South Wales — Trans-
portation of convicts to Botany Bay — Captain Phillip appointed governor — He
explores Port Jackson, and selects Sydney Cove for a settlement — A visit from the
French — Norfolk Island occupied — Hardships of the first settlers, and difficulties
with the convicts — Fresh consignments of criminals sent from Britain — Free
emigrants begin to arrive — Major Grose succeeds Captain Phillip — A demoralizing
truck-system introduced — Captains Paterson and Hunter successively governors —
Growing prosperity of the colony — John Macarthur inaugurates the wool trade. —
Early attempts to explore the continent — Important surveys of the coasts by Bass
and Flinders — Flinders unjustly detained at Mauritius by the French governor, and
deprived of his papers — His return to England, and death.
In all the Empire, Australia possesses the truest models of
" colonies ", as lands of virgin soil, containing from the first but
few aborigines, and formed into states by emigration conducted
mainly for the purpose of founding new homes, through tillage or
stock-keeping, for a surplus population from the old country, Great
Britain. This vast continental-island resembles North America,
apart from Mexico, in showing no traces of former dwellers who
played any part in the advance of civilization. There are no
stately ruins to declare that it was ever the seat of empire,
founded and held by a people great in industries and arts. The
region, when it was discovered by Europeans, appears to have
been declined as worthless. The Dutch might have added it to
their colonial dominions, but their merchants could see there no
prospect of wealth to be easily and quickly won, as in the "spice
islands" of East Indian seas, nor any other opening for profitable
settlement.
The real origin of Australian colonization was, as will be seen,
somewhat ignominious. A British navigator, sailing along the
south-eastern coast, makes a good report of the land as one fitted
for settlers, and the government first uses the territory as a place
of deportation for criminals, excluded from North America by the
newly-won independence of the colonies that had become the
" United States ". Thus it was that " Botany Bay ", which, even
in the " fifties " of the present century, was still a name of sinister
AUSTRALASIA — NEW SOUTH WALES. 143
sound, was at first selected as a place of abode for those who, in
the words of one of the early Australian convicts, Charles Bar-
rington, the famous pickpocket, " left their country for their country's
good ".
It is another feature of Australian history that, from the first
hour of a British landing, uncontested by any other of the Euro-
pean nations, the great territory has been wholly a British posses-
sion. No Wolfe, no Clive, was needed there to urge in battle
our rightful or wrongful claims against earlier wielders of power.
The British flag alone has ever floated on Australian forts, alone
has caught the breezes blowing on Australian shores. The sole
frontier is the sea. The internal history, save for the briefest and
least important of civil broils, and fights of settlers, sometimes
harsh and even cruel, against " mobs " of ignorant and savage
natives, has been one of perfect peace. We begin herewith the
history of a land which started on her colonial career as a prison,
and passed, by slow degrees, into a grand ever-widening wool-
farm and a garden rich in corn and wine and other goodly
produce, from beneath whose soil there came, with a rush, to light
the riches of a splendid gold-mine. The colony then became,
" by leaps and bounds ", a nation, emulating the mother-country,
far away beyond the seas, in material, social, political, and intel-
lectual advance.
Having lately completed the first century of her history in the
records of civilization, Australia presents herself to our gaze as a
region finely illustrative of British powers of progress, as a land
which is developing, under novel climatic, social, and economical
conditions, a new type of Briton, dwelling amid scenes lit up with
brightest suns, burning in bluest skies, by day, where the vault of
heaven, by night, is spangled with the most lustrous of stars. For
many an age, in the words of one of her most tuneful poets, she
rested, like " some sweet child within a chamber darkened, left
sleeping long into a troubled day", while the distant world of
Europe struggled on, through civil and religious strife and turmoil,
into a higher and a better life. The day of Australia's awakening
came at last, and the best of European energy and skill went
forth to possess and to cultivate the region found again "by strong
prying eyes of English seekers", a continent to be "a realm for
happier sons " of those who came, " one land whose history had
144 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
not begun", "a spacious reach of earth that has no heartache for
a ruined past", "a gracious freehold for the free" men of Great
Britain to have and to rule in a beneficent tenure of peaceful
progress, and there build up a new empire " beyond the rim of an
enchanted sea".
Passing from poetry into more sober but not more truthful or
instructive prose, we find that the ancient geographical writers,
Strabo, Pliny, and Ptolemy, the last (and latest) of whom flourished
in the second century of the Christian era, have allusions to the
existence of a mysterious great south land. It is believed that the
soldiers of Alexander the Great brought back with them from
India fragments of stories, long current there and in China, con-
cerning a vast island visited by birds of passage and by the more
adventurous savages of what is now called the Malay Archipelago.
In modern times, Australia may have been first discovered by a
French navigator from Provence, named Le Testu, who was on its
northern shores about the year 1531. It is certain that, in a rude
form, the region is marked on some French charts of 1542, as
Jave la Grande, or " Great Java." A book by Cornelius Wytfliet,
published at Louvain in 1598, mentions the land.
The first authenticated discovery was made in 1601 by a
Portuguese named Manoel de Eredia. In 1606, a Spanish navi-
gator, Luis de Torres, who was second in command of an expedi-
tion, consisting of three small ships, intrusted by the governor of
Peru to Fernandez de Quiros, was separated from his chief in
stormy weather, and passed through the strait, called by his own
name, between Australia and New Guinea. Torres may or may
not have caught sight, in his southward gaze, of the greater island,
but in the same year, beyond doubt, the Dutch came upon the
scene, and a vessel named the Duyffhen or Dove, landed some
men, who were killed by the natives, on the north-west shore of
the great Gulf of Carpentaria. During the next twenty years,
several Dutch navigators were engaged, at intervals, in viewing
the north-western and western coasts, and the arid nature of much
o.f the country, so widely differing from the south-east in appear-
ance and fertility, was doubtless a chief reason for the Hollanders
showing no desire to gain in that quarter fresh colonial territory.
The words on the map still bear token of the former presence of
Dutch navigators, in "Arnhem Land" and "Cape Arnhem ",
AUSTRALASIA — NEW SOUTH WALES. 145
"Dirk Hartog Island", and "Cape Leeuwin", or Lioness^ from
the name of the Dutch vessel which sailed along much of the
southern coast in 1622. The claim of the Batavian explorers to
early discovery was asserted by the title of "New Holland", the
name which remained in use for the whole region until a period
well advanced into the present century. The designation " Aus-
tralia", used by Samuel Purchas, the follower of Hakluyt, in his
famous book of voyages and travels, Purchas his Pilgrimes,
published in 1625, and by other old writers, for the great un-
explored southern continent, was revived by Captain Flinders,
whom we shall meet hereafter, and was adopted by the early
Australian colonists about the year 1817, afterwards passing into
general, official, and lasting acceptance. In 1696, we find Willem
de Vlaming, another Dutchman, arriving with three ships off the
mouth of the Swan River, and in the early days of the following
year, a boat's crew sent ashore found the commemorative tin plate
left behind by Dirk Hartog more than eighty years before. A
few natives were seen, but no intercourse with them took place,
and the expedition soon returned to Batavia, on the north-west
coast of Java, which was then, as it remains, the capital of the
Dutch East Indian possessions.
" Dampier Archipelago " and " Dampier Land ", on the west
coast, reveal the presence of William Dampier, the first English-
man, so far as is now known, who ever set eyes on the mainland
of Australia, and probably the first man of any nation who made
any formal survey of the coast, or attempted to gain some real
acquaintance with the interior. This adventurous mixture of the
explorer with the buccaneer was born near Yeovil, in Somerset-
shire, in 1652, and spent his youth and early manhood in voyages
to the East and West Indies. After some years passed as a log-
wood cutter on the coast of Yucatan, he joined a party of buc-
caneers in 1679, who crossed the Isthmus of Darien, and plundered
the Spanish coast far to the south. In 1683 he started with
anotjier semi-piratical expedition, which took him along the shores
of Mexico, Peru, and Chili, and across the Pacific to the Philip-
pine Islands, China, and other localities. After many adventures,
including a forced stay, through a quarrel with his comrades, on
the Nicobar Islands, Dampier made his way to England in 1691,
and published, six years later, an account of his voyage round the
VOL. I. 10
146 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
world. It was during this long cruise that Dampier and some of
his companions, in January, 1688, landed on the north-west coast
of " New Holland ", spending some weeks in refitting the ships,
and gaining some knowledge of the surrounding country.
The two volumes of Dampier's travels aroused the interest of
William the Third, and in 1699 he was placed in command of a
small vessel named the Roebuck, provisioned for a long voyage,
and supplied with a crew of fifty men. The leader was instructed
to ascertain whether "New Holland" were a continent or merely
an archipelago. In August the ship entered Sharks' Bay, the fine
inlet on the west coast, deriving its name from an enormous shark
there caught, and from the number of those fierce foes of the
mariner with which its waters were then, as now, infested.
Nearly a thousand miles of the coast, northwards as far as Roe-
buck Bay, were carefully explored, with frequent landings in search
of fresh water, which was only once obtained. Some natives were
seen, but were too shy for friendly intercourse, and too swift-footed
for capture. He describes them as "miserable wretches", devoid
of raiment or dwellings, living upon fish, and having tall, lean,
upright bodies. The region seen by Dampier was mainly low and
sandy. The only animal which struck him was, beyond doubt, the
kangaroo, which he describes as "like a raccoon", but "jumping
about on its long hind-legs ".
The navigators who sailed to the southern seas in that age
were fated, as it seems, to reach the north-western and western
sides of New Holland, the least attractive to the visitor who sees
nothing but the coast-lands, and this fact, for many years, turned
men's thoughts away from the region as one likely to prove
valuable for settlement. The Dutch, who could most fairly claim
possession, lost the reward due to their many efforts, simply
because they knew not the value of the prize which they had
won, and the legal doctrine of non user caused their right to lapse.
Dampier, after cruising along New Guinea and some adjacent
islands, returned to England without having solved the problem
presented by the " Great South Land," and his report of what
appeared to be a wholly barren and worthless region had its natural
effect on the minds of explorers and colonizers.
The day was to arrive, seventy years after Dampier's second
visit, when a greater man than he was to light upon a fairer spot
AUSTRALASIA — NEW SOUTH WALES. 147
in the vast mysterious land. On the morning of April 28th, 1770,
a party of dusky natives, armed with boomerangs and spears, their
bare bodies decked only with streaks of white, lay on the shore of
a little bay on the south-east coast of the long-neglected region
which still bore the name assigned by some patriotic Dutch navi-
gator, be he Abel Tasman or any other Hollander. The sky was
clear overhead, glowing with the light of the southern sun. The
wavelets rustled at the natives' feet on the long curving bar of sand,
and the gray-winged gulls were wading in the shallow pools, or
uttering notes of call, as they rose and fell and circled in the air
with capricious flight. Faintly to the ear comes the boom of the
waves from the open Pacific, as they break against the shore outside
the bold headlands at the entrance of the bay. Over rocks in the
rear the water drips with a lulling sound of harmony with the breeze
that blows through the metallic leafage of the gum-trees in the
forest. But these children of the soil have little regard for the
beauties of the scene amidst which they dwell. Their gaze is fixed
on a ship that rounds the headland to the south, preceded by a
pinnace rowing along the beach in search of an anchorage. They
spring to their feet in an attitude of menace, and keep pace with
the vessel as she moves near the shore. The anchor is dropped,
and the ship swings round opposite a group of trees near some
huts whence issue the smell and smoke of native cooking.
The scene is homely, but the circumstance is historic. The ship
is the famous Endeavour: her commander is James Cook. He
comes, though he knows it not yet, to be the first real discoverer
of Australia, the pioneer of a new and mighty empire for his native
land. His vessel has been beating up from the southward, skirting
a beautiful line of cliffs, with breaks into tiny havens, and with
beaches, here and there, of fair white sand. In the afternoon he
prepares to land, and, eager to make friends, if he may, with the
people, he flings beads and nails to propitiate two savages who take
their stand, with uplifted spears, on a jutting rock. They pick up
the nails and beads with evident delight, but still oppose any effort
to land, and only flee when, in reply to a stone flung at the boat,
some small shot from a musket peppers their legs. They soon
return with rude shields for their protection, but the spear and
shield cannot match the musket, and another shot drives the natives
to the woods. The party land and examine the huts, leaving
148 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
behind some ribbons and beads and pieces of cloth, as friendly
tokens in exchange for two or three spears secured as mementoes
of the visit. The captain sails round the shallow bay in his pinnace,
and some excellent hauls of fish are taken.
Two of his passenger-friends on board, named Banks and
Solander, whose names are affixed to the rocky headlands at the
mouth, are enchanted with the wealth of plants, unseen before by
scientific eyes, displayed on the shores of the new-found bay. An
endless variety of flowers and flowering shrubs would have dazzled
their sight with a profusion of brightest yellows and blues, and reds
and purples, and purest whites, in the early summer of the Australian
year; but April there is the autumn-time, and the once glowing
mass of petals on tree and shrub, plant, moss, and grass, unrelieved
by the bright and abundant green of the British foliage, is now
beheld in less brilliant array. The novel and varied abundance of
the plants, with parasites and vines linking the gum-trees in pendent
chains of foliage, amply justified the title assigned by Cook on the
suggestion of his friends, and accepted by posterity, of " Botany
Bay." A trip inland showed the voyagers flocks of bright-hued
parrots and paroquets, with the crested cockatoos never before seen
by European eyes. It is curious that, in two ways, the voyagers
should have missed seeing the magnificent harbour just north of
Botany Bay. In their rambles along shore and inland, they must
have come within a few hundred yards of hills whence their eyes
would have looked down upon its waters.
After hoisting the British flag, amid the roar of the ship's cannon,
and volleys of musketry, near both the northern and southern head-
lands, and claiming the country for George the Third, under the
name of New South Wales, from its resemblance in coast-line to
the south of the Principality, Cook sailed away on May 6th to the
northwards. He soon passed a small opening in the land, which
he named " Port Jackson ", in honour of his friend Sir George
Jackson, Secretary to the Admiralty. His neglect to enter was the
second failure to discover the grand haven which he thus named
without any idea of its real proportions. As he coasted the lofty
land, with rolling hills clad in foliage to the summits, the ship came
to an anchor in the broad and shallow " Moreton Bay ", and, con-
tinuing the northward voyage, she reached the latitude of the great
coral barrier-reef. At Keppel Bay, Cook, Banks, and Solander
AUSTRALASIA — NEW SOUTH WALES. 149
took a long walk inland, seeing hills erected by the white ants,
many flights of bright-winged butterflies, and some beautiful birds.
After thirteen hundred miles of voyaging along a coast never
before seen by Europeans, Cook, not far from a point which he
styled " Cape Tribulation ", had a narrow escape of losing his ship.
At ten o'clock on a moonlit night, as the Endeavour sailed through
twenty-fathom water, a sudden crash, followed by a quiver which
ran through the hull, and a heeling over till she lay fixed on one
side, showed that they had struck on a coral reef. The lightening
of the vessel, with the loss of cannon and part of the stores, and
the rise of the tide on the following night, set them afloat, but with
a leak only reduced to a degree with which the pumps could cope,
by the ingenious device ef passing a sail below and hauling it tight
with ropes on each side. The vessel was beached at the mouth of
a stream called by the captain " Endeavour River ", and it was then
found that she had mainly owed her safety to a huge piece of coral
left sticking in the timber, and thereby narrowing the rent which
had been made. During the repairs, Banks, with two greyhounds
which he had on board, varied his botanical studies by the first
kangaroo-hunt that an European had ever enjoyed, though the
game, with its long leaps, was found to be too nimble for the dogs.
The voyagers then sailed, still northwards, to Cape York, and
passed through Torres Strait, arriving in England, after grievous
suffering and many deaths from tropical fever, in about two years
from the time of departure.
The original object of Captain Cook's voyage is well known.
The great mariner, whose rise in life was due to natural ability and
the sheer merit of self-improvement and courageous effort, was
born at Marton, in breezy Cleveland, Yorkshire, in 1728, son of a
field-labourer, and apprenticed to a draper at the little fishing- town
of Staithes, ten miles north of Whitby. The lad could not brook life
behind a counter, and was soon found sailing in the coasting and
Baltic trade. In 1755 he entered the navy as an able seaman, and
four years more saw him ranked as master. With many years'
experience gained in surveying about the St. Lawrence and New-
foundland, and after time and trouble devoted to mathematics and
scientific navigation, Cook became lieutenant in 1 768, and was well
chosen to command, as we have seen, the ship sent forth, in August,
1769, with scientific men on board, to observe in the southern seas
ISO OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
the rare phenomenon of the transit of Venus across the disc of the
sun. The Royal Society induced the king to make the expedition
a national undertaking, and Cook, who had displayed the utmost
coolness and the steadiest nerve in taking soundings for Wolfe,
within earshot of the hostile sentries' challenge, in front of Quebec,
had thus received his first great chance of fame.
We are not now concerned with his brilliant later career in
Antarctic and Pacific seas, his discovery of New Caledonia, the
Sandwich Islands, and many other new lands, closed by his tragical
death in 1779, at the hands of the natives of Hawaii, the largest
island of the group named after Lord Sandwich, then at the head
of the Admiralty. The main fact of Captain Cook's life, for our
present purpose, is his voyage along the eastern coast of Australia,
and especially his landing at Botany Bay. He it was who first, in
the true sense, discovered Australia for his country and the rest of
the civilized world. Favoured by fortune in the point of his access,
and aided by his keen and practical eye, Cook saw the value of the
new land as a place for colonization. While Banks and Solander,
true to their vocation, were exulting in the acquirement of new
scientific specimens, the commander of the expedition had observed
rich pasturage, patches of black soil which promised great fertility
as a return for tillage, and freestone good for house-building. The
report which he made was duly noted by government officials, and
was turned to account when the time arrived. Meanwhile, Cook's
discovery of eastern Australia made a revolution in European
beliefs concerning the distant land. The impression made by
Dampier was effaced, and the navigators of other nations turned
their thoughts, and then steered their ships, towards Australian
shores. Apart from Cook's claim on behalf of his king and country,
Great Britain, as we shall see, narrowly escaped the assertion of a
right in favour of France.
It was not till after the Treaty of Versailles in 1783, granting
independence to our late North American colonies, that the difficulty
caused by the want of a place whither to transport felons, caused
the official mind to bethink itself of Botany Bay. In 1 787, Viscount
Sydney, the Secretary of State for Home affairs, to whose control, in
a measure, colonial matters also belonged, resolved to found a con-
vict-settlement in the spot described by Captain Cook. The new
policy was dictated by considerations of benevolence as well as of
AUSTRALASIA — NEW SOUTH WALES. 151
public convenience. The pity of good men had been aroused in
behalf of the criminal class, who were declared by some philan-
thropical writers to be victims of a vicious social system, and the
public conscience was, in some degree, shocked by the frequent
executions which took place under the then atrocious criminal code.
The royal prerogative was often used in commuting death to
banishment for life, with capital punishment for unauthorized
return, and the benevolent were anxious to afford to criminals, on
a distant shore, the chance of a new and better career.
Hence came the sailing in the month of May, 1787, of the
notable expedition called the " First Fleet ". The Sirius frigate,
under Captain Hunter; an armed tender, the Supply, under Lieu-
tenant Ball; three store-ships, and six transports, carried altogether
more than a thousand persons, all under the control of Captain
Arthur Phillip as Commodore for the voyage, and as Governor for
the projected colony. The new movement was made under an Act
of 1783, for the transportation of offenders "beyond the seas", and
their removal from the lately-established and now crowded " peni-
tentiaries " and hulks. Public interest had been widely and warmly
aroused, when the ships went forth, conveying ten civil officials,
over two hundred marines and their officers, with wives and children,
about eighty free persons of various trades and callings, five hundred
male and nearly two hundred female convicts. Mr. Collins went
out as judge-advocate, with the duty of presiding in the military
courts which were to administer justice. The confinement and
crowding of an eight months' voyage, with disease either brought
on board or thus engendered, proved fatal to eighty-nine persons.
After touching at Teneriffe, Rio de Janeiro, and the Cape of Good
Hope, the whole of the ships came to an anchor in Botany Bay on
January i8th, 1788, and the two succeeding days, and a debarka-
tion was promptly effected.
The head of the expedition had been happily chosen for the very
important work in hand. Captain Phillip was one of the noblest
types of mankind — a British sailor of the highest class. Now in
his fiftieth year, he had served in the navy at the capture of
Havannah, the capital of Cuba, in 1762, and, a year later, when the
Treaty of Paris gave him leisure, he had married and settled down
to farming at Lyndhurst, in the New Forest. Afloat again in the
great war when Britain was engaged with the naval forces of
152 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
France and Spain and Holland, he was now selected for duties to
which he was, by nature and training, admirably fitted. Accus-
tomed to discipline and method, of gentle and most sympathetic
nature, calm of soul and patient in the hour of difficulty and distress,
generous and hopeful, self-reliant, decided, prompt and terrible in
his rarely-needed punishments, he dealt with the circumstances of
a novel and difficult position in such a way as to earn the blessings
of those whom he ruled, and to win the renown of one of Australia's
foremost governors in character and ability, as he was first in order
of time.
Captain Phillip soon found reason to regard the beautiful Botany
Bay as a spot unsuitable for the foundation of his penal colony.
Most of the ground, from its sandy or rocky nature, was not fitted for
tillage, and the only fresh water to be seen lay in swampy soil likely,
in a hot climate, to breed fever for those committed to his care. The
waters of the bay were so shallow as to prevent a near access to
the shore for most of his vessels, which were compelled to anchor
out near to the headlands, exposed to the roll of the great Pacific
waves. With three ships' boats he went forth in search of a more
convenient haven and place for settlement, and, passing northwards
for eight or nine miles, he turned into the opening, believed by
Cook to be a mere boat-harbour, and named by him, as he passed,
Port Jackson. The winding channel was guarded on either side
by lofty, grim -looking rocky cliffs, and then a few oar-strokes
brought the searcher in sight of one of the finest prospects of its
kind in the world. Far away to the west, until it was lost on the
horizon, lay a vast expanse of water, winding into countless creeks,
the coast clad in foliage of dark-green woods, the surface dotted
with little sunny isles, the beaches of the bays fringed with strips
of gold-hued sand. Silent lay the scene beneath the blue of Aus-
tralian skies on the January day which there affords the warmth of
summer at its height, as the boats glided onwards and flung from
their oars the first foam ever churned from the surface of that sea,
since the dawn of the world, by the arm of any civilized man. On
projecting rocks stood dark-skinned groups of natives at the gaze,
as the white men looked with enchanted eyes on the matchless
beauty of the new-found refuge for the exiled band. After three
days spent in examining parts of the spacious harbour and explor-
ing some of the numerous inlets, a site was selected at a tree-shaded
AUSTRALASIA — NEW SOUTH WALES. 153
cove, into which a purling stream discharged its clear waters. Close
to the rocks which lined the shore there was anchorage for ships
in a depth of twenty feet, and it would be needless to construct
wharves or piers. The place was named by its discoverer Sydney
Cove, in honour of the Secretary of State, and on its shores were
shortly to arise the beginnings of the now stately and beautiful
town known to all the world as Sydney.
On his return to Botany Bay, Phillip found parties of convicts
engaged in digging wells and in making wharves for the landing of
goods, but the news of his discovery of the grand harbour to the
north brought these toils at once to an end, and preparations were
made for a move on the morrow. At daybreak of January 26th
the anchors were being weighed, and the echoes of the sailors'
chorus were rolling round the bay, when two strange vessels were
seen standing in between the headlands. They were flying the
French flag, and proved to be the Boussoleand. the Astrolabe, under
the command of the Count de la Perouse, his second-in-command
M. de Langle, of the Astrolabe, having been killed a month previ-
ously in an encounter with the fierce natives of the Navigators
Islands. The famous and ill-fated La Perouse was thus, as we
hinted above, a week too late upon the scene to claim that part of
New Holland for the Bourbon king, the hapless Louis the Six-
teenth, so shortly to be face to face with armed revolt in his capital.
The French navigator, who had been distinguished in the late
war against Great Britain, by destroying forts of the Hudson Bay
Company, received a courteous welcome from Phillip, and came to
anchor in the bay, where he remained for some weeks. In the last
days of February, or the early days of March, the Frenchmen sailed
forth from Botany Bay, and from that hour, for many a year, they
vanished from the sight, and even from all knowledge, of civilized
man. French expeditions of search went forth in vain, and it was
not until the year 1826 that any light was thrown on the mysterious
end of La Pe" rouse and his men. Captain Dillon, of the East India
Company's service, was at that time cruising in southern seas, when
he came upon the relics of shipwrecks which had occurred at the
Vanikoro Reefs, off an island of that name lying north of the New
Hebrides. Both vessels had gone ashore and part of one crew had
escaped from the sea, some to die by the hands of savages, others to
sail off in a small vessel of their own building, and never to be heard
154 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
of again in Europe. Some guns, anchors, and chains, recovered from
the spot in 1883, are now to be seen in a Paris museum. On the
northern shore of Botany Bay stands a tall pillar, backed by Norfolk
Island pines, in memory of the French explorer and his comrades.
January 26th, 1788, is a memorable date in Australasian history.
In the evening of that day the whole party of emigrants went
ashore in Sydney Cove. A few trees were cleared away on the
bank of the little stream, and on this open space a flagstaff was
erected. The Union Jack was run up, and, after the firing of three
volleys, the governor read his commission to the assembled com-
pany. A canvas dwelling was put up for his accommodation, with
a piece of garden-ground on which to plant the saplings of orange,
grape, and fig brought from the Cape of Good Hope. The next
few days beheld a toilsome and bustling scene where trees were
being felled, and axes, saws, and hammers plied for the building of
huts under the orders of the convict overseers and the directions
of the skilled free craftsmen. When some approach to comfort and
order had been secured, the women of the party came ashore, and
on the following day, February yth, a ceremonial took place. The
marines were drawn up in square, and Governor Phillip addressed
the first settlers of Australia, including the convict party, in a few
words of manly eloquence, some of which have proved to be pro-
phetic of good fortune surpassing the most sanguine hopes which
he could ever have formed. The convicts, for their part, were
exhorted to pay a due regard to their own welfare, by leading
better lives in their new abode. His speech concluded thus:—
" What Frobisher, Raleigh, Delaware, and Gates did for America,
that we are this day met to do for Australia, but under happier
auspices. Our enterprise was wisely conceived, deliberately devised,
and efficiently organized; the Sovereign, the Parliament, and the
people united to give it their authority, encouragement, and sanc-
tion. We are here to take possession of this fifth division of the
globe, on behalf of the British people, and to found a state which,
we hope, will not only occupy and rule this great country, but will
also be the beneficent patroness of the entire southern hemisphere.
How grand is the prospect which lies before this youthful nation!"
Within a brief space of time, the labour of the emigrants had
laid a firm foundation of the first Australian town. Round the head
of the cove were placed the main buildings needful for the kind of
GOVERNOR PHILLIP ADDRESSING THE FIRST AUSTRALIAN
SETTLERS UPON LANDING AT SYDNEY COVE.
In May, 1787, an expedition, consisting of a frigate and tender, with
store-ships, transports, and about a thousand people, sailed from England
to found a colony in Australia. Early in the following year they discovered
a great harbour inside the headlands of Port Jackson, and landed at a point
which they named Sydney'Cove — now the city of Sydney. Here Captain
Phillip, the head of the expedition, assembled all the colonists and addressed
them in stirring words. His concluding sentences were prophetic: "We
are here," he said, " to take possession of this fifth division of the globe on
behalf of the British people, and to found a State, which, we hope, will not
only occupy and rule this great country, but will also be the beneficent
patron of the whole southern hemisphere. How grand is the prospect
which lies before this youthful nation!"
W. S. STAGEY.
GOVERNOR PHILLIP ADDRESSING THE FIRST AUSTRALIAN SETTLERS
UPON LANDING AT SYDNEY COVE.
Vol. i. p. 154.
AUSTRALASIA — NEW SOUTH WALES. 155
community which had just started on its career. The prisoners'
huts were flanked by the marine barracks. The prison, near the
waterside, was faced by another barrack. The officers' quarters
were erected a little way inland, and beyond them lay the maga-
zine. Storehouses and workshops were put in hand, and a hospital
was provided for the many sufferers from scurvy and other bodily
ills. At the end of the western headland were placed an observa-
tory, or look-out station, and a battery for signalling. The first
"Government House" of Australia was constructed on the eastern
side of the cove, and beyond that, inland, were buildings for a farm.
A stratum of clay, some distance to the south, became the site of
brickfields and kilns, and the erection of a gallows, as a necessary
terror to the many evil-doers, completed the equipment of the
infant colony.
The governor was destined to discover, at an early day, that
he had been charged by his sovereign with the execution of a very
difficult and arduous task. The opening history of New South
Wales is a record of severe trial, and, in the hands of a less able
and resolute ruler than Phillip, disastrous results might well have
ensued. The government had bidden him to aim at making the
colony self-supporting, and he was expected to obtain, by tillage
and other means, within two years of landing, about half the supply
of food needed by the settlers. One of the first steps taken by
Phillip towards this end was a division of his numbers. On March
5th, 1788, within a month of his inaugural address, he despatched
Lieutenant King and Lieutenant Ball with fifteen convicts, nine
officers and soldiers, a surgeon, and two free labourers, to an island
discovered by Captain Cook in 1774. Norfolk Island, famous for
its noble pines, which often exceed a height of two hundred feet, is
a small and picturesque spot about midway between New Caledonia
and New Zealand. Its fertility, partly shown by a dense and
wide-spread growth of native flax, had been greatly praised by its
discoverer, and it was hoped that the free labourers, who were
skilled in flax-dressing, might teach the convicts to turn the plant
to profitable use. A few weeks later, on a good report made by
Lieutenant Ball, a larger party was sent to the island, and abundant
crops were raised from the soil.
This agricultural prosperity was not, at the outset, the lot of
those who remained in New South Wales. Some land was taken
156 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
up at a spot called Rosehill, at the head of a river flowing down to
Sydney, fourteen miles away. The town which there arose is known
as " Parramatta", from native words meaning " head of the water",
and comes next, in point of age, to Sydney. The first harvest ever
reaped in Australia was there gathered in at the close of 1789, and
two years later about one thousand acres were under tillage around
the two settlements. Before that better time was reached, the
colonists in and near Sydney had been more than once threatened
with starvation. The farming, at first, was of the rudest kind, and
the convicts gave incessant trouble. Many could scarcely be forced
to work even in the menacing presence of armed soldiers. Their
implements of labour were wilfully broken, or hidden away for
avoidance of the labour absolutely needed to wrest food from the
soil. The weekly allowance of provisions was wilfully wasted or
devoured too fast, and then came piteous appeals to the governor,
and frequent robberies of provisions from the stores. Nothing but
the strong arm of military force, directed by the firm will of Governor
Phillip, could have staved off ruin in these earlier times. A few
horned cattle, including two bulls and half a dozen cows, with a
horse and three mares, some sheep, goats, and pigs, and a number
of fowls, had been brought out, but the sheep and cattle were
nearly all killed for food, and the prospect of future stock would
have vanished, but for the happy neglect of a convict herdsman who
allowed a bull and two or three cows to stray into the " bush",
where they soon were lost. A few years later, their descendants
were found as a fine herd of sixty feeding in the meadows of the
Hawkesbury river, flowing into the sea about fourteen miles to the
north of Port Jackson.
In March, 1790, the stock of provisions had fallen so low that
nearly three hundred convicts, with two companies of marines,
under Major Ross as Lieutenant-governor, were sent to Norfolk
Island, where it was hoped that an abundant supply of food was
being furnished from the soil. The Sirius frigate conveyed this
party, but was wrecked on a reef near the island, with the loss of
many stores, including the personal effects of the passengers and
crew, who were all saved in a half-drowned condition. They came
ashore at Norfolk Island only to learn that there, too, misfortune
had befallen the settlers. A recent hurricane had ruined the
granaries and the crops, and had been followed by a flood which
AUSTRALASIA — NEW SOUTH WALES. 157
swept off all that the winds had spared. Luckless, indeed, were
these first Australian colonists under the rule of the excellent man
who could control himself and the people in his charge, but could
not deal with the forces of nature. Before this time, the Guardian
transport, bringing supplies, had been in collision with an iceberg,
and had thrown overboard a large quantity of food. The Sirius,
sent to the Cape of Good Hope, and the Supply, despatched to
Batavia, had returned with provisions that only sufficed for a few
weeks' consumption. Governor and officers, alike with the soldiers,
free settlers, and convicts, were forced for a time to exist on rations
barely sufficient for the support of life.
Meanwhile, the government at home, unaware of the serious
state of affairs, were making free use of the new opening for the
criminal class. In June, 1790, a vessel arrived in Sydney Cove
with more than two hundred female prisoners, and the first detach-
ment of a body of troops called the New South Wales Corps,
raised in 1789 as the JO2nd Regiment of the Line. The officers
and men were not of the highest class in character, as convict-
guarding was considered a somewhat degrading duty, and the new
colony, at present, held forth in Great Britain no attractions for
either military men or civilians. Other vessels with convicts
arrived, after voyages marked by large mortality among the
prisoners, due to overcrowding and to the lack of fresh provisions
and pure water, aggravated, in at least one instance, by cruel treat-
ment at the captain's hands. By degrees, at one point, the prospect
brightened, and the fear of failing food was ended in 1791 by the
arrival of vessels with ample stores, and by the growing success of
the tillage on the lands near Sydney and Parramatta. Criminals
were still poured in from the home country, and the " Second
Fleet", which arrived in September, 1791, brought about fifteen
hundred convicts, nearly all of whom were men. Two hundred
people had been buried at sea, and those who landed were in a
shocking state of bodily weakness.
The energies of Phillip, whose health was failing, as his pale
pinched features painfully proved, were taxed to the utmost in
dealing with the various elements of trouble. The convicts were
the cause of incessant care. Now they stole away to the woods,
and either died of starvation or in conflict with the natives, whom
they had often provoked, or returned, with the looks of living
158 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
skeletons, to seek mercy and food from the governor's hands.
Others, again, stole boats in the cove and tried to escape to the
Dutch in Java, and one adventurous party of forty or fifty men, in
their blank ignorance of geography, set off with the intent of
walking to China. A few years later, the whitened bones of these
miserable creatures were found in the bush not far from the settle-
ment.
Towards the close of Governor Phillip's five years' tenure of
office, some bolder spirits from the British Isles came forth to the
new colony as free emigrants, encouraged by the promise of gifts
of land. A number of these, in 1792, received grants of about one
hundred acres at a place called Liberty Plains, near Sydney. At
the same time, the policy of granting land to well-conducted and
promising convicts was adopted as a means of social regeneration
for the penal element. The first gift of freedom, with a piece of
land at Parramatta, was bestowed on a convict in 1790, and before
the governor's departure for England in December, 1792, nearly
three thousand acres had been awarded to free immigrants, and
about fifteen hundred to emancipated men, who received therewith
a gift of rations for eighteen months, with implements and stock
for their new career. Captain Phillip retired with a well-earned
pension, and died at Bath more than twenty years later, leaving
behind him an honoured name.
After the departure of Captain Phillip, the colony inaugurated
by him became subject to troubles arising from misgovernment of
a noxious character. The rule of the settlements fell into the
hands of Major Grose, as senior officer of the New South Wales
Corps, a second detachment of which reached Sydney at the time
when Phillip was sailing for home. This body of military police
succeeded in earning an evil repute for violent and unscrupulous
behaviour, and their commander appears to have been worthy of
his men. Major Grose, having official charge as Lieutenant-
governor, was succeeding to the control of a system in which,
amidst many serious troubles, good order had been established and
maintained. That system was, to a large extent, dependent upon
the military power, and the new ruler seems to have been led
astray by his exclusive regard for the military element. In
defiance of the instructions which he had brought from home, large
grants of land were made to the officers, and they were allowed to
AUSTRALASIA — NEW SOUTH WALES. 159
have round them a needless number of convict-servants, to whom,
under what is called a "truck system" of the most pernicious kind,
wages were paid in ardent spirits instead of in cash. The employer
derived much profit from these transactions, and the efforts which
the late governor had made to debar the convicts from the use of a
large original cause of their crimes, were now succeeded by direct
temptations, furnished to, or rather forced upon, their victims by
the very men in authority, who thus subverted discipline and de-
stroyed all hope of reformation. The convict portion of the settlers
were abandoned to all the debauchery of intoxicating liquors, which
were not only imported by the officers from Great Britain and
from nearer sources, but were eagerly thrust into the colonial
market, with unprincipled greed for wealth, by the merchants of
our Indian possessions.
In December, 1794, Grose was succeeded by his colleague,
Captain Paterson, of the same military corps, and he, for the few
months of his official supremacy, permitted the same evils to
endure. The home government, however, had at length obtained
knowledge of the grossly demoralized condition of the colony, and
their resolve to suppress the traffic in strong liquor was followed
by the appointment of a new ruler. A further supply of free
emigrants had reached New South Wales in 1793, and the tillage
of the soil was thus extended in grants of land accompanied by
gifts of needful stores until the reaping of the fruits of toil.
The new governor, Captain Hunter, who had returned to
England after the loss of his ship, the Sirius, assumed a five years'
tenure of power in September, 1795. He was a just and honest
man, of virtuous life and kindly disposition, but he was not, it
seems, gifted with the strong will of Governor Phillip, and, in spite
of his righteous intentions and efforts, the evil traffic was not much
lessened. The colony, however, began to make real and marked
progress in agricultural affairs, due to the arrival, in 1 796 and 1 798,
of fresh bodies of free settlers, to whom convicts were assigned as
labourers. Hunter had himself brought out a number of these
useful emigrants from the old country, and the foundation of the
towns of Windsor and Richmond, on and near the river Hawkes-
bury, soon followed the breaking up of soil in that quarter.
Before the close of the century, New South Wales had been
fairly launched on her great career, and the coming source of her
160 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
principal and most enduring wealth had been discovered in the
production of wool. The length of the voyage made it difficult to
land sheep at Sydney even alive, much less in a healthy condition,
and many attempts ended in failure. Manufacturers at home were
clamouring for wool, the production of which was decreasing in
England, as pasture-farms were turned into arable land under the
rising price of wheat. The greatest gratitude is due to the efforts
of a very sagacious, able, and enterprising man, John Macarthur,
founder of Australasian pastoral industry. Macarthur went to
Sydney in 1791 as captain in the New South Wales Corps. He
soon resigned his commission in disgust, and, while his late brother-
officers were amassing wealth by the illicit sale and the distillation
of rum, he turned his thoughts to sheep as a likely source of
legitimate gain. The fine pastures of the land had caught his eye,
and his first aim was to improve the breed of the fleece-bearers.
Having taken up a grant of land at Parramatta, he obtained some
ewes and lambs from Bengal, but their wool was poor in quality
and colour. In 1794, a cross was made with some Irish sheep
procured from the captain of a merchant -vessel, and Macarthur
noted an improvement in the fleeces. The great object was to
produce a really fine wool for the British spinners and weavers,
now obtaining the material for the best broad-cloths solely from
the flock-masters of Saxony and Spain, who possessed, in limited
numbers, the finest sheep for wool in the world, of the breed known
as Spanish merino. In 1797, Macarthur obtained some pure
merinos from the Cape of Good Hope, derived from the famous
Escurial flock, specimens of which had been presented by the
Spanish king to the Dutch government. A marked and rapid im-
provement in the wool was the result, and it was clearly shown
that a brilliant future in this direction was opening for settlers in
the southern hemisphere. Macarthur was soon possessed of some
thousands of sheep, and, to pass for a brief space, on this important
subject, into the present century, we may record that in 1801 he
took to England fleeces of so fine a quality as to prove to the
British woollen manufacturers that they need no longer be
dependent on Saxony and Spain for their best material.
During this visit, the enlightened and public-spirited colonist
was allowed to purchase, from George the Third's farm at Kew,
some rams and an ewe, of the best merino breed, sent from Spain
AUSTRALASIA — NEW SOUTH WALES. l6l
as a present to the British " farmer-king ". They were tended
with extreme care, and their safe arrival at Sydney, in good
condition, finally secured the development of what was to become
one of the greatest industries of the world. An application to the
Privy Council in London, and the support of the British workers
in wool induced Lord Camden, then in charge of colonial affairs, to
send a despatch, at the close of 1804, to Governor King, which
obtained for Macarthur a grant of ten thousand acres of land, still
known as the Camden estate, about forty miles south-west of
Sydney.
The close of the eighteenth century saw the colony of twelve
years' history containing from six to seven thousand souls. Other
occupations than tillage and sheep-farming were beginning to gain
ground. The Australasian harbours became the seat of a flourish-
ing whale-fishery in the southern seas, and, for years before the
arrival of any large number of free immigrants, this was the chief
occupation of mariners in those waters. A whale in the act of
spouting is included in the arms of Sydney and Melbourne, and
the shores of Tasmania, New Zealand, and southern and western
Australia were the resort of British, colonial, and American
fishers. In 1795 a brewery, established at Parramatta, began to
tempt settlers to the consumption of good ale in place of bad
spirits, and this was the commencement of an industry which now
produces beer equal even to that issuing from the vats of Burton-
on-Trent.
EXPLORATION OF THE CONTINENT AND SURVEY OF
THE COASTS.
In these early times of Australian settlement, little was done
in the way of exploring the interior of the vast continent. In
1793, some officers of the New South Wales corps made a vain
attempt to cross the barrier called the Blue Mountains, and the
only person known, in that age, to accomplish the feat was a
convict who had lived long among the blacks, and who made
his way, in 1799, as far as the Lachlan river. Before the close
of the century, Lieutenant Bowen travelled as far as Jervis
Bay, a fine harbour about one hundred miles south of Sydney,
and Port Stephens, eighty miles to the north-east, was also
surveyed.
VOL. I. 11
1 62 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
The first Europeans who ever landed in the region which now
forms the colony of Victoria were the crew of the Sydney Cove,
wrecked on Furneaux Island, north of Van Diemen's Land. A
large party of the crew started in boats, hoping to reach Sydney
by a coasting-voyage, but they were cast ashore in a storm near
Cape Howe, the south-eastern extremity of New South Wales.
The place of their landing was more than three hundred miles, as
the crow flies, from Sydney, and the road lay through a region of
dense bush. Their stock of provisions was soon exhausted, and
little food or fresh water could be found on their way. Many
dropped down and died from hunger and fatigue, and most of the
survivors were murdered by natives when they were but thirty
miles from the longed-for refuge. Two or three arrived at Port
Jackson, with their raiment in rags, their frames wasted to mere
skin and bones, and so weak that they were carried like infants
on board the boat which conveyed them to Sydney Cove. Mr.
Clarke, the ship's supercargo, was one of these survivors, and, on
his recovery, he gave an interesting account of the large tract of
country which, under circumstances so tragical, he had been enabled
to observe.
Within the thirty years that elapsed between Cook's arrival in
Botany Bay and the close of the eighteenth century, very much
was done towards completing the world's knowledge of Austral-
asian coasts. The first discovery and the early history of Tas-
mania belong to a later section of this work, but we may here
observe that Captain Furneaux, Cook's second in command, on his
second voyage round the world, sailed along the coast of Tasmania
in the belief that it formed part of the mainland of Australia, and
regarded the straits as a deep indentation. Captain George Van-
couver, of the royal navy, whose name has acquired enduring
renown as that of a fine British colonial possession, and who was
a comrade of Cook on his third great voyage, discovered King
George's Sound, in Western Australia, in 1791.
The two navigators whose names will ever be connected with
this period of Australian discovery were George Bass and Matthew
Flinders. Bass, born in 1770, son of a Lincolnshire farmer,
became surgeon to the Reliance, which in 1795 brought out
Governor Hunter to Sydney. Flinders, one of our greatest
seamen, was also a native of Lincolnshire, four years younger
AUSTRALASIA — NEW SOUTH WALES. 163
than Bass, whom he accompanied as midshipman on board the
Reliance. There were never two young men of more admirable
character, compounded of modesty, kindliness, daring, and en-
thusiasm. Devoted friends, they had resolved by joint endeavours
to win fame in the exploration of unknown regions. Flinders had
lately heard the roar of guns in battle at Lord Howe's victory of
"the glorious First of June", 1794, when he was serving on board
the Bellerophon. His future career was to be of a more peaceful,
but yet of a very adventurous and chequered kind. A month
after their arrival at Sydney Cove, the two comrades bought a
boat eight feet long, which they named the Tom Thumb, and,
taking a boy on board to complete her crew, they sailed out
between the Heads to the open Pacific. Tossed like a cork
on the ocean waves, they steered into Botany Bay, and made an
accurate map of its shores and streams.
With this first-fruits of their adventurous toil they won from
the governor a leave of absence which enabled them to start on
a new and somewhat longer expedition. Nearly eight hundred
miles of coast to the south of Port Jackson was marked on the
charts of the day as " unknown ", and they were fully resolved to
clear up some of this mystery. In the same tiny craft, they went
on their way, and soon had their boat upset on the shore. The
powder for their guns was wetted by the sea, and they spread it
out on rocks to dry in the sun. A large body of natives gathered
round with menacing air, but Flinders, knowing something of
native tastes, gained time and amused the blacks by clipping their
beards with a pair of scissors. When the powder was ready, the
muskets were charged, and they were allowed to put off without
molestation. During the trip, currents carried them away to the
south, and much peril was incurred from storms. The boy had to
bale, while Bass held the sail, as they scudded with the wind, and
Flinders steered their course with an oar. Returning to Sydney,
after other dangers off rocky shores, they brought with them the
means of accurately mapping between thirty and forty miles of
coast. It was then that they learnt how Mr. Clarke, of the Sydney
Cove, had already supplied information as to much of the coast-line
which they had started to examine.
Flinders was now compelled to go with his ship to Norfolk
Island, and Bass was sent out by the governor in charge of a whale-
1 64 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
boat with six men, supplied with provisions to last some time.
In this craft the young surgeon, during a voyage of eleven weeks,
made many important discoveries, and secured a lasting place for
his name on the maps. Shoalhaven Bay and River were entered.
Jervis Bay, one hundred miles south of Sydney, was added to the
charts, with the noble haven of Twofold Bay, good for anchorage,
and safe from all winds save the east. Thirty miles further
brought him to Cape Howe, and, steering along the Ninety-mile
Beach, Bass discovered and marked down the great headland
called Wilson's Promontory, the most southerly point of the
Australian continent, forming part of a huge granitic mass. A
continued voyage to the westward proved that Van Diemen's
Land was no part of Australia, and the water which divides them
has since been known as Bass Strait. Six hundred miles of
Australian coast were explored before the return to Sydney.
Flinders, on his arrival from duty at Norfolk Island, was engaged
in making careful surveys of the islands and coast to the north of
Tasmania.
The geographical achievements of Bass and Flinders were not
lost upon Governor Hunter. In 1798 he supplied them with a
small sloop, and accorded three months' leave of absence for
further exploration. They sailed all round Van Diemen's Land,
discovering the river Tamar, named after the beautiful Devonshire
and Cornish river, with its estuary, Port Dalrymple. Flinders
made the most exact and beautiful charts of all the coast-line, and
the party returned to Sydney with a rich harvest of geographical
research.
From this point we lose sight of Bass, who, according to some
accounts, returned to England in 1799, and afterwards continued
to serve in the navy; while others assert that he engaged in a con-
traband trade with Spanish America, where he is supposed to have
been captured by the guarda-costas, and to have died a prisoner,
toiling in the silver mines. In any case, he here vanishes from
the view, though not from the memory of mankind. Flinders
remained constant to his useful labours, and in 1799 carefully
surveyed, in the sloop which had carried him round Tasmania, the
Australian coast northwards from Sydney to Hervey Bay, in what
is now Queensland. He had now attained the naval rank of
lieutenant, and, when he returned to London, in 1800, the publica-
AUSTRALASIA — NEW SOUTH WALES. 165
tion of his Australasian charts obtained for him high praise, and,
from the Government, a practical recognition in the form of an
independent command. In 1801 he left the British shores as
head of an expedition for the express purpose of further explora-
tion of the Australian coasts, commanding the Investigator, and
furnished with papers from the French Government, with which
his country was then at war, to secure him from molestation. His
scene of action was now on the south coast, where he discovered
the fine Kangaroo Island, named from the large number of those
animals which were seen leaping amongst the scrub, and Spencer
Gulf, on the mainland opposite.
In April, 1802, at Encounter Bay, near the mouth of the Murray
River, Flinders fell in with the French ships Gtographe and Natu-
raliste, under the command of M. Baudin, who had been despatched
by Napoleon on a voyage of Australian exploration. The French-
men found that, on the southern coast, Flinders had anticipated all
their intended researches in discoveries which were afterwards
claimed by the French. The French and English explorers met
again, a few months later, at Port Jackson, where the foreign crews,
suffering from scurvy, were treated with extreme kindness by the
Sydney settlers.
It is well to remember these facts in view of the subsequent
fate of the great Australasian navigator. Before this second meet-
ing with the French, Flinders had taken the eastern and northern
coasts in hand, surveying the Great Barrier Reef, the passage
through Torres Straits, and the Gulf of Carpentaria. After a visit
to Timor for fresh provisions, he sailed down the western coast, and
arrived at Sydney in June, 1803, winning the honour of being the
first man to circumnavigate Australia. He then sailed for England,
with his valuable charts and journals, in a store-ship which was soon
wrecked on a coral-reef. The papers were saved, and the dis-
coverer returned to Sydney in an open boat, to start again for home
in a vessel which, proving leaky and ill-found, was forced to put in
at Mauritius, then in French possession. The governor, M. de Caen,
made Flinders a prisoner, and deprived him of his papers, on the
pretence that the safe -conduct of Napoleon only applied to the
Investigator, on which Flinders had left England. At this juncture
M. Baudin called at Mauritius, but any efforts which he might have
made for the release of the gallant Englishman were prevented by
1 66 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
his own death. The charts were sent to France, and were pub-
lished there under the names of Frenchmen. Flinders remained a
prisoner until 1810, when Mauritius was captured by a British ex-
pedition, and at last he reached England to find that his countrymen
were already in possession of the knowledge which he had hoped
to be the first to communicate. The truth, however, was soon
brought to light, and the real discoverer sat down to write the
account of his explorations, with most accurate maps and extracts
from his log-book. His constitution had been broken by years of
toil and exposure, with shipwreck and severe privation as interludes,
followed by a lengthy, harsh, and wrongful imprisonment. The
constant labour of four years in preparing his great work, A Voyage
to Terra Australis, completed the process of slaying the author.
There is nothing more touching in the whole history of travel
and its literary records than the closing scene of this true British
hero, Matthew Flinders. He never saw the book, in its finished
form, which had cost him his poor remains of life. As the last
sheets of the three volumes were issuing from the press, his wife
and daughter were in tears over his bed of death, and he drew his
last breath on July igth, 1814, the very day on which the work
was published. If real merit always earned due recognition, the
remains of this great maritime discoverer, devoted to his work for
the work's own sake, asking and receiving no earthly reward save
the power of toiling on for mankind, would assuredly lie, among
countless inferior men, within the walls of Westminster Abbey. His
name will exist as long as Australia is found upon the maps, in
Flinders counties of New South Wales and South Australia; in
a watering-place about sixty miles south-east of Melbourne; in
Flinders Bay, between Capes Leeuwin and Beaufort, discovered by
him in 1801 ; in the Flinders Group, off the coast of Queensland; in
Flinders Island, off South Australia; in another and larger Flinders
Island at the eastern side of Bass Strait; in the two Flinders Points
of Tasmania and Victoria; in the Flinders Range, reaching hun-
dreds of miles to the north of Spencer Gulf; and in Flinders River,
flowing into the Gulf of Carpentaria. These are the monuments
which keep his name ever before the men of Australasia, who have
not failed to accord substantial recognition to the posterity of the
man who, beyond all others, drew the veil from their coast-line. It
is an agreeable duty to record that the granddaughter of Flinders
CANADA — EARLY HISTORY. 1 67
has been receiving for nearly half a century a pension of two
hundred pounds granted by the governments of Victoria and New
South Wales.
CHAPTER V.
CANADA — EARLY HISTORY (1534-1713).
First efforts by the French to colonize Canada — Jacques Carder — De la Roche's attempt
to form a settlement — Pontgrave and Chauvin — Champlain, the founder of French
Canada — The Sieur de Monts and De Poutrincourt — Colony of Acadie — Beginning
of Quebec — The Algonquins, Iroquois, and other Indian tribes — Their savage raids
on the settlers — Arrival of the Jesuits — Richelieu's policy towards Canada — The
" Hundred Associates"— Quebec surrendered to the English, and basely restored by
Charles I. — Able rule of Governor Champlain — Indian outrages on the missionaries
— Colbert's able administration — Marquis de Tracy and Governor de Courcelles —
Military operations against the Iroquois — Encouragements for emigration from
France — Ravages of disease and drunkenness among the Indians — Governor de
Frontenac— La Salle's expeditions to the west — Massacre of Lachine — French attacks
on English territory — English expeditions against Montreal and Quebec — Continua-
tion of the frontier warfare — Failure of English attempts for the conquest of Canada.
The rise of the existing British colonial dominion in North
America was mainly based, not on settlement or colonization in the
true sense, but on conquest from another European power, which
had acquired a prior possession of territory on and near the great
river which reaches the Atlantic just fifty degrees north of the
equator. Around the mouth of another and greater river, falling
into the Gulf of Mexico just twenty degrees further south, our great
European rivals had also set their feet as claimants of a vast and
indefinite region to the north and west of that commanding point.
We shall see that the struggle ending in victory for Great Britain
was provoked by French attempts to connect, to our detriment,
their possessions on the northern river and the great adjacent lakes
with the southern lands claimed for Louis the Fourteenth in 1682
by one of the greatest French explorers in North America. This
was Robert Cavalier, Sieur de La Salle, a native of Rouen, and a
settler in Canada, who, descending the Ohio in hope of reaching the
Pacific, passed into the Mississippi, reached the mouth, and named
the country " Louisiana". Apart from the visits of the Northmen,
five hundred years before Columbus, the mainland of North Ame-
1 68 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
rica, as we have seen, was first reached by European navigators at
the close of the fifteenth century. In 1498, the Cabots of Bristol saw
Labrador, the country named in 1501 by a Portuguese navigator,
Gaspard Cortereal, who sailed from Lisbon with two ships, and
called the country between Newfoundland and Hudson Strait
Terra Labor odor, or labourers' land, from a cargo of natives whom
he carried off as slaves.
The attention of Francis the First of France was called to the
wealth which was being won from fisheries in that part of the New
World, and he resolved that his brother - kings of Portugal and
Spain should not, as he exclaimed, " divide all America between
them, without allowing me any share". He accordingly sent forth,
in 1534, a bold seaman of St. Malo, Jacques Cartier, who sailed in
the month of April with two vessels of about sixty tons each, carry-
ing one hundred and twenty men. Detained by ice off Newfound-
land, he passed through the Strait of Belle Isle, saw the Magdalen
Islands, rich in berries, birds, and blossoms, named a fine bay " Des
Chaleurs", from the heat which the voyagers felt on a sunny July
day, and finally landed, south of a great estuary, at the rocky
Cape Gasp6. A wooden cross was erected, with a shield bearing
the fleur-de-lis, and an inscription claiming the land for the French
monarch. The natives, by signs, made known to him the existence
of a large river flowing north-east from the interior, and he passed
onwards until he saw the land on either side. The season was
advancing, and the French voyagers returned, carrying with them,
as willing visitors to Europe, the two sons of an Indian chief.
Francis the First was much pleased with Cartier's success, and
supplied him, for the next year's voyage, with three ships of larger
size, better fitted out and manned. Some young French nobles
were on board, when, after hearing mass in the cathedral of St.
Malo, and receiving the bishop's blessing, the expedition went forth
in the last days of May, 1535, with instructions, as stated in the
royal commission, to " form settlements in the country and to open
traffic with the native tribes". Stormy weather retarded the arrival
of the voyagers at the mouth of the great river until the middle of
July. It was on August loth, the festival of St. Lawrence, that
Cartier bestowed on a small bay the saint's name which afterwards
passed to the river and to the great gulf into which it flows. As he
sailed up the estuary, through a dark ravine near a river on the left
CANADA — EARLY HISTORY. 169
bank, and past high jutting cliffs, he came to an island covered with
wild grapes, where he was welcomed by a native chief, one of the
Algonquin tribe, with a large body of followers.
The French leader now determined to pass the winter in the
new-found land, and on September I4th he cast anchor at the
mouth of another river on the left bank, above which rose a massive
lofty hill. The river now bears the name of St. Charles. At the
foot of the heights stood the little Indian town of Stadacona, on
the site of the future Quebec. Passing upwards with the boats, as
the navigation, from sand-banks and other obstacles, grew difficult
for the ships, Cartier and his comrades beheld on each hand the
rich-hued leafage of the far-reaching forest, and on October 2nd
they arrived at a Huron Indian town called Hochelaga, above
which rose a great woody hill. The Frenchman named this height
Mont Royal, which became in due time the designation "Montreal"
for the colonial city.
A most friendly reception from the natives, who supplied abun-
dant fish, and maize from the fields around their strongly-stockaded
town, was followed by a feast, and by the first Christian service
ever held in those regions. The natives appeared to regard their
white visitors as people of supernatural powers, and brought their
sick and maimed and blind for healing. Cartier read a lesson from
the Gospels, and, with the sign of the cross, prayed for the bodies
and souls of his hosts. The Indians looked on in friendly amaze-
ment, and then received, with a better understanding, presents of
beads and toys and knives. The discoverer of Canada — for such
was Jacques Cartier — had a noble prospect of water and wood
from the summit of Mont Royal, and he learned from his Indian
friends something of the existence, to the west and south, of mighty
lakes and rivers, and of interminable lands, rich in game, and rarely
or never trodden by the foot of man. A few days later, the French-
men returned to their Algonquin friends at Stadacona, near which
they erected a stockade, armed with cannon, around their ships.
In his resolve to winter on American ground, Cartier had not duly
reckoned with the severities of the Canadian climate, and, in the
lack of proper clothing and provision, much suffering and many
deaths ensued from attacks of scurvy.
In the spring of 1536, when the melting ice allowed the ships
to move, the French returned to Europe, taking with them ten of
I/O OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
the Algonquin chiefs who had been decoyed on board. This per-
fidious return for many kindnesses received had for its object the
display to the French king of some living tokens that success had
been again achieved. The effect upon the native mind was disas-
trous, and Cartier's act is believed to have been the origin of hostile
feelings towards European visitors. If it was intended to restore
them to their native forests, the purpose was frustrated by the
death of the whole number before Cartier's next voyage to Canada.
It was in 1541 that he again went from Europe to America, now
in command of five ships. A Picardy noble, the Sieur de Rober-
val, had been appointed Viceroy of " New France ", and Cartier, as
his deputy, preceded him with a body of settlers. His appearance,
in August, at Stadacona, without any of the Indian chiefs, was
unwelcome to their brethren, and Cartier found it necessary to
fortify a position at the point called Cap Rouge, some miles above
Quebec, and to await reinforcements, for which two of his fiv.e
vessels were sent back to France.
In 1542, after another wretched winter, Cartier himself, hearing
nothing from Roberval, started for Europe, and met his superior,
with three ships and a large body of male and female colonists,
off the coast of Newfoundland. He declined to turn back with
Roberval, who landed at Cap Rouge, passed a winter made terrible
by cold, famine, and disease, causing the deaths of over sixty per-
sons, and unrelieved now by friendly aid from the Indians. The
settlers brought out by the Sieur were chiefly convicts, and needed
the sternest treatment for the maintenance of due order.
In the summer of 1543, Cartier was again sent out to fetch
home Roberval, and, after a third winter passed there, he left the
country in May, 1544, conveying back to France the surviving
settlers, who had wholly failed in attempts to explore, to trade, or
to till the soil. At this point, the discoverer of Canada vanishes
from history, after arriving at St. Malo. De Roberval, in 1549,
sailed with another private colonizing expedition, but not a vessel
of the little fleet, nor a man on board, was ever again heard of.
Thus ended the first French efforts to colonize Canada.
Half a century glides away, during which French fishermen
would be found on or near Canadian shores, and, at some points on
the St. Lawrence, a trade in furs and skins was carried on with the
natives by Frenchmen who did not settle in the country. The
CANADA— EARLY HISTORY.
I/I
attention of English navigators and colonizers was drawn, as we
have seen, to other parts of the Atlantic sea-board. The fisheries
of Newfoundland were a source of vast profit to British "adven-
turers ", and the experience of Cartier did not recommend the
climate of Canada. Efforts at finding the " north-west passage "
drew off some of our boldest spirits, taking Frobisher and Davis,
Hudson and Baffin, on lines removed from the Gulf of St.
Lawrence, and from the territory claimed as " La Nouvelle France".
Raleigh's thoughts, in his exploring moods, were full of Virginia
and Guiana, and, in the conflict with Spain for freedom, faith, and
national existence, Englishmen of later Elizabethan days had abun-
dant work to prevent them from seeking to enter the New World
by the gateway which France, for so many years, seemed to have
left open.
At last, under Henry the Fourth, in 1598, France again paid
heed to her trans- Atlantic claims. A Breton noble, the Marquis de
la Roche, received a commission as " Viceroy of Canada, Acadie,
and other territories ", which was taken to include the whole nor-
thern part of the North American continent, with sole rights of
trade in fur. The marquis took an ignoble view of his enterprise,
and filled a ship with a cargo of convicts. Forty poor creatures
were landed on the sand-hills of Sable Island, near the coast of
Acadie (afterwards Nova Scotia), where they remained for five
years, living a savage life, and subsisting on fish and on wild cattle,
the descendants of stock left there by an early French explorer.
In 1603 twelve survivors, clad in skins, were rescued by a French
vessel. De la Roche, driven back to France by a westerly gale,
died a ruined man, after many years' imprisonment.
In 1599, a merchant of St. Malo, named Pontgrave, and
Chauvin, a naval officer of Rouen, received from Henry the Fourth
the rights forfeited by De la Roche, and undertook, in return for
a monopoly of the Canadian fur-trade, to establish a colony of five
hundred persons. Two vessels left France in the spring of 1600,
and a trading-post was formed at Tadousac, near the ravine of the
river Saguenay. This attempt also ended in failure. Some of the
French fur-traders perished from the severe cold, and the rest were
dependent for food on the Indians. Chauvin died during his third
attempt at a French colony in Canada, but was not left long without
a successor.
1/2 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
The trade in furs which had arisen with the Indian trappers
and hunters was one of great profit to the European purchasers,
and De Chastes, the governor of Dieppe, brought the matter before
the notice of some wealthy merchants. The hour and the man
had at last arrived, when Samuel de Champlain was induced to
join the enterprise. This able, honest, and energetic man, whose
name lives in that of the beautiful lake which he discovered, was
the real founder of French Canada, the father of her colonial exis-
tence. For more than thirty years his personal history is almost
identical with that of the colony which he set upon a firm basis.
A native of the old province of Saintonge, born in 1567 at Brouage,
on the Bay of Biscay, Champlain was, from his early years, inured
to the sea, and in 1603, when he started on his first voyage across
the Atlantic to Canada, he held a position in the royal marine.
He had fought as a soldier under his sovereign, Henry of Navarre,
in the wars of the League, and it is almost certain that he was a
Huguenot or French Protestant. His character was composed of
a mixture of romantic enterprise with religious enthusiasm and
chivalrous courage. An ardent explorer and keen observer, he left
behind him writings which describe in lively terms some of the
scenes of his adventurous career in colonial affairs. Pontgrav6
and Champlain, sailing with two small vessels, and passing up the
St. Lawrence, found nothing whatever left of the trading-post at
Tadousac, or the Indian town of Stadacona; nothing but ruins at
the fort of Cap Rouge, and not a trace of the Indian town of
Hochelaga. On their return to France they found that de Chastes
was dead. Champlain, however, who had partly explored the rivers
Saguenay and Richelieu, won the king's favour by displaying a
map of his travels.
The enterprise was renewed under the auspices of a rich Hu-
guenot noble, the Sieur de Monts, high in favour with Henry, who
appointed him viceroy of La Cadie or Acadie, specified as the
region extending from the fortieth to the forty-sixth degree of
north latitude. This country corresponds with Nova Scotia and
some of the adjacent continental territory. The patentee, de
Monts, received a monopoly of the fur-trade and powers as supreme
ruler, with permission to exercise and allow his own Calvinistic
faith, but to cause the Roman Catholic religion to be preached
among the natives.
CANADA — EARLY HISTORY. 173
In March, 1604, de Monts, Champlain, and Pontgrave sailed
from Le Havre with the largest expedition that had yet left the
French shores for America. The colony included persons of very
diverse station and character. There were gentlemen of good birth
and criminals from jails; soldiers and artisans, Calvinist preachers
and Catholic priests. After exploring the Grande Baye Franchise
(afterwards Bay of Fundy), where a noble named de Poutrincourt
received a grant of land, which became the site of Port Royal, the
voyagers, on June 24th, St. John Baptist's day, entered a harbour
since called by his name. A severe winter was passed on the bleak
and barren island of St. Croix, where nearly forty of the settlers
died of scurvy, and the spring saw de Monts remove to Port Royal,
from which he explored the coasts for some distance to the south.
During the terrible sufferings from cold which froze the very wine
in the casks, Champlain had been the life and soul of his desponding
fellow-countrymen. Their hearts were cheered in the early summer
of 1605 by the arrival of Pontgrave and de Poutrincourt with sup-
plies from France. The foundations of a town were laid in store-
houses and barracks, workshops and dwellings, a chapel and a
governor's house. A mission to the heathen natives of the land,
with the support of Mary de Medicis, was started by a Jesuit
Father named Biart, and matins and vespers were regularly sung
round a cross erected in the centre of the hamlet called St. Sauveur.
The colony in Acadie was beginning to prosper, and the settlers
could live by the fruits of their toil, when the winter of 1606 arrived.
De Monts had been compelled to return to France, where enemies
were plotting against his interests, and in 1607 a vessel arrived
with news that his charter had been revoked, and an order that the
settlement should be abandoned. Champlain and all the colonists
returned to France, and thus ended the first serious French attempt
to settle in North America. In full prospect of success, jealousy at
home and court intrigues had brought the enterprise to a sudden
and untimely end.
Three years later, Baron de Poutrincourt returned to the scene,
armed with new powers from Henry the Fourth, and received a
warm welcome from the Indian chiefs, whose people had done no
harm to the buildings of the little town, nor to any of their contents.
The death of the French king by Ravaillac's hand made Jesuit
influence paramount at court, and the revived colony was seriously
1/4 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
troubled by quarrels between the civil and religious powers.
Anarchy and famine were threatening the settlers, when destruction
from a new quarter swooped down upon Port Royal. A Captain
Argall, from Virginia, who was little more than a British piratical
adventurer, attacked a settlement founded by the Jesuits, who had
now left their countrymen, on an island in an inlet on the coast of
Maine, which is known to this day as " Frenchman's Bay ". A
single broadside swept off the Frenchmen who had manned their
ship, and the place was plundered and reduced to ruin. Some of
the prisoners were turned adrift in a boat; the rest were carried
away to Virginia, where the governor threatened to hang them for
invasion of British territory. This sorry exploit of international
greed was perpetrated in 1613. In the following year, Argall came
down upon Port Royal, plundered the houses of all their goods,
even to the very locks upon the doors, and razed the fort level with
the ground. De Poutrincourt's efforts to colonize Acadie were, on
o
this blow, finally abandoned in despair, and in 1615 he found a
soldier's grave in his native land.
From Acadie our narrative wanders away to a new scene of
action on the great St. Lawrence. Champlain, in 1608, returned
to America, with Pontgrave as his companion, both of them in the
service of de Monts. On July 3rd, near the spot where, about
seventy years before, Cartier had passed the winter months, Cham-
plain laid the foundation of Quebec. He describes the name as
the Indian term for a strait, applied to the narrows of the river
where the promontory stands which he then saw covered with
creeping vines, and crowned by walnut-trees of stately growth.
The wooden fort of his erection was on the site of the existing
market-place in the lower town.
The career of Canada had now fairly begun, and her founder
soon had troubles to face. A plot for his murder, provoked by
the needful sternness of his rule, and punished by the hanging of
its leader and the despatch of his fellows in chains to France, left
the great French pioneer of colonial rule with less than thirty men
at his command. The scurvy, in the winter, carried off all of these
save eight. The spring of 1609 brought new colonists and sup-
plies from France, and Champlain set himself zealously to work.
His efforts at exploration brought him into contact with the
powerful Algonquins, one of the three North American tribes of
CANADA — EARLY HISTORY. 175
whom we hear most in early Canadian history, which at one period
chiefly consists in a narrative of continual warfare between the
natives and the European colonists who were striving to make
their way to the great western prairie-region. The two others are
the Hurons and the Iroquois.
These native tribes, devoted to the chase, and thus acquiring
exceptional endurance and activity of frame, were regularly formed
into subdivisions, villages, or bands, the whole being subject to a
sachem or civil chief, aided by councillors chosen from the foremost
warriors, and ruling, as he best could, a fiercely democratic people.
The local system was that of clans, connected in blood through
female descent, and bearing emblems or crests called " Totems ",
which often exhibited the form of some wild animal, the bear or
the beaver, the otter or the wolf, regarded with superstitious
reverence, and secured against killing, as being the common
ancestor of the clan. If the "totem" were a plant, the prohibition
would then be directed against eating. The members of the same
clan could not intermarry, and were all bound together by the
principle of vendetta or blood-feud. Craft and cruelty were com-
mon to all the natives of North America, who numbered, it has
been reckoned, but two or three hundred thousand in the whole
vast region lying between Hudson's Bay and the basin of the
Mississippi.
The Algonquins, amounting to nearly one hundred thousand,
ranged over a great region from Hudson's Bay to South Carolina,
and from Cape Gaspe, at the mouth of the St. Lawrence, to the
river Des Moines in Iowa. Their sub-tribes included the Mic-
macs of Nova Scotia; the Abenakis of Maine; the Pequods of
New England; the Shawnees of Kentucky and Tennessee; the
Miamis, along the Ohio to Lake Michigan; the Ojibways, near
Lake Superior; and the Sioux on the prairies east of the Missis-
sippi. The Hurons or Wyandots dwelt in the peninsula which
lies between Lakes Erie, Ontario, and Huron, and may have num-
bered twenty thousand.
The Iroquois, or Five Nations, are the Indians most familiar
to the student of that period of North American history which
deals with the struggles between the British and the French
settlers. They included the divisions called Senecas and Mo-
hawks, and roamed over the land lying between the upper waters
1/6 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
of the Ohio, Delaware, and Susquehannah, and the shores of Lake
Ontario. The Iroquois have been regarded, with good reason, as
the bravest and most cruel of Indian tribes, waging war on all
sides, both against foreign settlers and natives, and earning their
successes by a combination of courage and disciplined arrange-
ment. Their position in the country which now forms the state of
New York gave them a great advantage in moving by lakes and
rivers to the parts where they wished to deal their blows. The
Hiawatha of Longfellow presents their chief points of character.
The energetic spirit of this master-tribe of North America was
displayed alike in the conflict with man and in the hunting of wild
animals; in their hours of leisure, devoted to gambling, hard
drinking, and dancing; in the careful tillage of large tracts of
maize, and in the fact that their victorious achievements were
those of warriors who at no time exceeded the number of four
thousand. It was in an expedition with the Algonquins against
their ancient foes, the Iroquois, that the French explorer dis-
covered Lake Champlain. The European muskets, in a fight near
Lake George, by its later name, routed the Iroquois in sudden
dismay, but the victory was one for which the Canadian French
were destined to pay a heavy price. The defeated tribe, for a
century and a half, were the deadly foes of their European
assailants, and, in the ambush of their irregular warfare, and in
the stealthy murder of outlying settlers, they wreaked a manifold
vengeance for every warrior that fell in the battle. In the spring
of 1610, an attack on their entrenchments at the mouth of the
Richelieu ended in a second defeat for the Iroquois, but the
struggle was hard, and Champlain was wounded by an arrow in
the neck.
For many years from this date, Champlain was the animating
spirit of the French colony. More than twenty times in all he
crossed the Atlantic in the interests of his charge, and, through his
courage, fidelity, and zeal, he enjoyed the confidence of successive
nobles named as Viceroys by Louis the Thirteenth. These titular
governors remained in France, and left their deputy free in his
exercise of actual rule. In 1611, he selected the island of Mont-
real as the site for a future city, by erecting a fort for the protec-
tion of the fur-trade at the point where the Ottawa joins the St.
Lawrence. The island called St. Helen's commemorates the name
CANADA — EARLY HISTORY. 177
of Champlain's newly-wedded wife. Religious duty towards the
natives was not forgotten, and in 1615, through his personal inter-
vention in France, a new body of settlers was accompanied by
three Recollet friars, the first of the devoted missionaries who play
so large a part in the early history of Canada. One took his place
at Tadousac, another at Three Rivers, and a third at Quebec,
where, on June 25th, mass was first said in a Canadian church.
Eager for exploration, Champlain, in the same year, accom-
panied by some of his Huron friends, was the first European that
ever gazed on the waters of Lakes Huron and Ontario. His
most westerly point was Lake St. Clair; and he reached Quebec
in July, 1616, after taking part in another attack on the Iroquois.
Their strongly stockaded town was assailed in vain, and the
Algonquins retired, carrying their French ally, disabled by two
wounds in the leg. He now devoted his time and thoughts to
the advance of his little colony. Quebec, having then but wooden
walls, was strengthened by a fort of stone in the lower town, and
Champlain began to erect, on the higher ground, the castle of St.
Louis, which became the abode of Canadian governors until its
destruction by fire in 1834. Little encouragement came from
home in the form of new settlers aiming at tillage, and the
Iroquois, in 1620, made the first of the invasions which, in coming
years, were so often to harass the French in Canada. Their
attacks were at present repulsed by the aid of muskets and cannon.
In 1621, the departure of many of the traders in fur, who were
hampered by interlopers from France, reduced the number of
colonists to less than fifty.
In 1625, Henri de Levis, Due de Ventadour, became Canadian
viceroy. This nobleman had lately exchanged the luxuries of
court life for the severities of a monastic order, and was fired with
zeal for the spread of the Christian faith in the New World.
With this view, he sent out some Jesuit fathers to Canada. This
religious body, the Society of Jesus, so renowned in the ecclesias-
tical and in much of the political history of the modern world, had
been founded, about ninety years before, by the noble ex-soldier of
Spain, Ignatius Loyola, aided by his countrymen Lainez, Francis
Xavier, and Bobadilla. These foremost champions of the Church
of Rome, the Jesuit order, were soon distinguished by their
subtleness of policy, their vehemence of zeal, their exactness of
VOL. I. 12
1 78 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
discipline; by self-denial, by intense and stubborn devotion to a
single end, and by the utmost versatility and skill in their choice of
means. Debarred from promotion to high rank in the church, and
freed from all temptations towards the visible prizes of worldly
ambition, the Jesuit aimed at unseen strongholds of an inner realm
in controlling the minds and the souls, in winning the opinions and
the feelings of men. The pulpit, the press, the confessional, the
school, — these were the battlefields of Jesuit warfare. Science,
literature, learning, art, were all pressed into the service of
orthodox religion. In the world of Europe, as they waged their
contest amongst heretical peoples, their fearless courage defied the
terrors of spies and penal laws, of racks and dungeons, of gibbets
and blocks. In every land, under every disguise, their work was
done. In missionary effort, they took, in exact truth, the world
for their province. The distant regions of China and Japan, India
and Tibet, and the Philippine Isles, of the eastern hemisphere ;
Brazil and Paraguay and California, in the new-found west; Abys-
sinia, and Kaffirland, and the Guinea coast, of African climes,
were all within the range of Jesuit travel. Their endeavours to
convert the heathen were greatly aided by sound judgment and
by worldly wisdom. As they wandered through the regions laid
open to European enterprise by maritime discovery, among divers
nations and peoples and tongues, they were careful to tend the
bodies as well as to strive to win the souls of those to whom,
with enthusiasm guided by knowledge and light, they made their
appeals. They sought to civilize the pagan for his life in this
world of weariness and pain, as well as to fit him for the happiness
and glory of a future state. Their skill in botany and medicine,
their acquaintance with the arts of tillage, carpentry, and building,
all contributed to the attainment of the main object of their lives.
Nor was it distant lands alone that received benefit from the
labours of the Jesuits. They largely added to the store of
European knowledge in languages and science, in ethnology and
exploration. The alkaloid quinine, priceless as a tonic and a
specific remedy for certain fevers, was formerly known as Jesuits'
Bark, being first brought to Rome from the forests of Peru,
and distributed thenceforth among the missionary stations of the
order.
Among all explorers of North America, the Jesuit fathers,
CANADA — EARLY HISTORY. 179
undaunted in all dangers, untired by any toils, were the most
successful and renowned. One of their number, Claude Allouez,
made his way to the regions lying north of Lake Superior, and, on
his return to Quebec, first gave knowledge of the vast land of
prairie lying to the west. Marquette, launched on the Wisconsin
in a birch-bark canoe, paddled down the river till he reached a
greater stream, passed along until it received the waters of the
great Missouri, and continuing his course beyond the mouth of the
Wabash or Ohio, arrived at the Arkansas, first revealing that the
mighty Mississippi had a southward course towards the Gulf of
Mexico which afterwards, as we have seen, was attained by his
countryman, also of Jesuit training, Cavalier de la Salle.
The one thing in which the Jesuits failed in North America
was as regards helping forward the work of colonization. The
Indians, in some cases, were won for the Christian faith, but the
whole system of the church, as then administered in France, was
opposed to political equality and progress, and advance was hin-
dered by the strife which arose between the priestly element and
the more liberal and enlightened of the French governors. The
fatal policy adopted in 1685, when the revocation of the Edict of
Nantes alienated and banished a large part of the best industrial
skill and intellectual resource of France, had its counterpart in
Canadian rule, and rendered the French trans-Atlantic colonies
yearly less capable of coping with the swiftly advancing British
settlements in New England and on other parts of the Atlantic
coast. Before the close of the seventeenth century, the colonists
of Canada were outnumbered by their British neighbours in the
proportion of about twenty to one, and the failure of France to
secure for herself a trans-Atlantic empire was thus largely due to
the sheer want of population to hold in sufficient force the land
which she claimed.
In 1627, the great statesman, Cardinal Richelieu, was the
virtual ruler of France, as minister of Louis the Thirteenth. By
his advice an important change was now made in the machinery
for governing Canada. All charters were annulled, and the country
was placed in the hands of a body called the "Company of the
Hundred Associates". Their rights extended from Hudson's Bay
to Florida, and theirs was the monopoly of all trade, with the great
exception of that arising from the whale and cod fisheries. Com-
ISO OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
merce and religion were combined in the objects of the new scheme,
which bound the Associates, within the space of fifteen years, to
bring from France and plant colonists to the number of five thou-
sand, with due provision for their spiritual wants. The cardinal
and Champlain, with many wealthy merchants and distinguished
nobles, were members of the " Hundred Associates", among whom
the character, experience, and performances of the founder of
French Canada naturally gave him a foremost place.
The one thing wanting for permanent success was a readiness
among large numbers of the French people to follow their colonial
and religious pioneers from the towns and fields of sunny France to
the banks of the St. Lawrence. This they persistently declined to
do, and, without this, no patronage, however distinguished, no views
or purposes, however enlightened or benevolent, could possibly
win success for a colonial enterprise. The right man, however, was
retained at the head of affairs when, on the abolition of the vice-
royalty, Champlain was appointed Governor of Canada. It is im-
portant to observe that a State Church was now fully established,
in the technical sense, and that all Huguenots, the very salt of the
earth for real colonization, were banished from the country.
The new departure had scarcely been made, when British hos-
tility dealt a severe blow. In 1628, Charles the First declared war
against France, and Buckingham made his imbecile attempt to
relieve the Huguenots besieged in La Rochelle. A French Pro-
testant refugee, Sir David Kirke, was intrusted with a fleet for
operations in the St. Lawrence, and sailed for those waters with a
dozen British ships. From Tadousac he despatched a message to
Champlain, demanding the surrender of Quebec. That chivalrous
and stout-hearted man was hard pressed for food and devoid of
means to resist so large a force, but his answer was a bold defiance
to the foe. The position was one of the utmost anxiety for the
French. The first fleet of the Associates was due from France,
consisting of eighteen vessels, heavily laden with cannon, ammu-
nition, and provisions for Quebec. The messengers of Kirke, with
their demand for surrender, had been well entertained with the
best at command, but the French were really limited to half a
pound of bread per day, and the magazine held only fifty pounds
of powder. Life or death seemed to depend on the arrival of the
fleet. Fortune declared against the French, when Kirke, who was
CANADA — EARLY HISTORY. l8l
cruising in the river and biding his time, heard that the ships had
appeared off Cape Gaspe. On July i8th a running fight gave him
possession of all save one, and, after removing the cargoes and
burning most of the vessels, he returned to England with prisoners
and plunder. Hard times had come for the people of the colony,
who, by the spring of 1629, were searching the woods for edible
roots. Champlain, according to his wont, played a hero's part in
enduring hardship and inspiring hope, but the government at home
could not or would not send supplies, and the arrival of three
British men-of-war, at the end of July, alone saved the people
from death by starvation. Quebec was given up with its garri-
son of sixteen haggard men; the townsfolk, about one hundred
souls, were glad to share with them the food furnished by the
victors. For three years from this date the British flag flew
from the Castle of St. Louis, where a brother of Kirke resided as
governor.
Champlain, taken to England as a prisoner of war, and then
restored to France, was again able to work for her colonial interests.
Finding that peace between the two countries had been made in
Europe at the time when Quebec was surrendered to Kirke, he
induced the French government to demand the return of its colo-
nial possession on this technical ground. Charles the First, who
now was ruling England as an absolute monarch, yielded to the
request, and in 1632, by the Treaty of St. Germain - en - Laye,
Canada was restored to France. Champlain was, of course, re-
placed as governor, and went forth, in March, 1633, on his twelfth
voyage beyond the Atlantic, with three ships, bearing two hundred
settlers and large supplies of goods for trade, provisions, and war-
like stores. His work for Canada was, as it proved, nearly done.
In 1634 he erected forts at Three Rivers and at the mouth of the
Richelieu, for the protection of the fur-trade, and as barriers against
the inroads of the implacable Iroquois, and directed his utmost
efforts to the advance of the colony and the spread of the faith
among the native tribes. On Christmas-day, 1635, after a long
illness, which reduced him to the last extremity of weakness,
Champlain, first and greatest of his country's Canadian rulers, high-
souled, pure in life, just, merciful, laborious, disinterested, a bold
and successful explorer, passed from the world in which he had
played not merely a notable, but a noble part.
1 82 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
We may here inquire how it was that England, once in posses-
sion of Quebec, surrendered the post, after three years' tenure,
which she was finally to acquire by conquest after the lapse of more
than a century and a quarter. There can be no doubt that the
keen discernment of Richelieu, when he placed the colony on its
new basis, under the Hundred Associates, had marked Canada as
a region worthy of retention by his country, from the wealth of its
fisheries, specially valuable as a nursery for seamen, from the trade
in furs, and from the existence, in that region, of vast supplies of
timber. On these grounds the conquest made by Kirke should have
been of at least equal value in the eyes of the English government.
Why was so promising a territory, fairly won in time of war, so
unwisely and tamely abandoned ? The answer is plain. The trans-
action was but one instance of the base betrayal of the national
interests and honour at the hands of the Stuart kings who strove
to exercise arbitrary power over a free and high-spirited people.
There is documentary evidence, in the shape of a letter in Charles
the First's own hand, which proves that the English king simply
sold back to France the nation's new acquisition. Charles had
lately made reckless and unprovoked war upon his wife's native
country, and had disastrously and ignominiously failed in the
attempt to relieve La Rochelle. Much money had been spent, and
the king was at issue with Parliament on the subject of "supplies"
for the service of the crown. The secret of his conduct with
regard to the cession of Quebec was only revealed in 1884, when
Mr. Brymner, the Archivist of the Dominion of Canada, had dis-
covered the king's letter in the Harleian Collection at the British
Museum. The document is addressed to Sir Isaac Wake, ambas-
sador to France, and is dated June I2th, 1631. It is a fact that
at this time only half of the marriage-portion of Henrietta Maria
had yet been paid over. One-half had been paid in London on the
queen's arrival after the proxy-marriage, which took place in Paris
on June i3th, 1625. The remainder was due in June, 1626, but
had never been received by Charles. Wake was directed to urge
payment of the money on the ground that Quebec should be
restored to France. The affair thus became a mere matter of
bargain, and no other reason for the act has been or can be given.
The place could have been held with the greatest ease against any
force which Richelieu was likely to despatch for its recovery by
CANADA — EARLY HISTORY. 183
arms. The national strength was bartered away in order to put
money in the pocket of Charles the First.
We know little or nothing of the history of Quebec during the
three years of its occupation by England, but we learn from a
report addressed to the king that the fort was armed with cannon
and furnished with supplies of food for eighteen months, and with
all kinds of tools needed for the construction of other works. The
holders of Quebec declare themselves to be in a position to with-
stand an attacking force of ten thousand men, and that they "doe
not care what French or any other can doe". The time, however,
was not yet come for the development of the vast resources of
Canada, and English colonization was, through the action of an
English monarch, to remain for many a year shut in by the Alle-
ghanies. The extension of British territory was thus made to
follow, as we have seen, the run of the Atlantic sea-board, from
Massachusetts to New Hampshire and Rhode Island, and from
Virginia to the south. The French held the waterways giving
access to the five great lakes, and the spirit of adventure in New
England was thus turned in the direction of maritime enterprise
against their French neighbours, with results to be hereafter seen.
The value of Champlain to the French colony in Canada was
strikingly demonstrated by the languor which followed his removal
from the scene. The Hundred Associates had no ideas higher than
those of mere merchants, eager to drive bargains with the Indian
fur-hunters and to make profits in the trade. During the quarter
of a century after the death of Champlain, little real progress was
made. The Associates, who had undertaken to send over five
thousand colonists in fifteen years, despatched less than one thou-
sand in more than double that period of time. Champlain had left
behind him, in 1635, about two hundred and fifty Europeans.
Barely a hundred were added during the next five years, and in
1662, when the charter of the Associates was annulled, the French
population had not reached two thousand, few of whom had arrived
there through the Company's action.
In temporal matters the duties of government were grossly
neglected. Kingsford, the latest historian of French Canada, in a
work of the utmost research and value, declares that " there was no
protection to life or property. The husbandman who sowed his seed
could not count on his life to reap it; the wife who saw her husband
184 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
depart in the morning to his work was not certain that he would
return to partake of the meal she was preparing." Champlain had
made it one of his chief objects to erect forts, not only as material
defences, but as visible signs of the power of France, which should
impress the native mind with an image of the strength beyond the
seas that was ready to protect her sons on the banks of the St.
Lawrence and amid the clearings of Canadian woods. It was with
this view that he had fortified the island now called He Richelieu,
about fifty miles above Quebec, and, a few months before his death
had made a strong post at Three Rivers.
In spiritual affairs, at this time, great zeal was shown on the
part of the mother-country. Within twelve years of Champlain's
death more than forty Jesuit missionaries went out among the
Huron Indians, and many emigrants from France arrived for reli-
gious work, including some ladies of rank and fortune. A stone
convent arose at Quebec in 1642, on the site now occupied by the
Ursuline nuns, and the devotion of French women to Christian
labours was shown in their nursing the victims of small-pox, which
had seized the natives in their loathsome huts. The Duchesse
d'Aiguillon, a niece of Cardinal Richelieu, founded a hospital for
the natives far up the country, and the nurses for this first Hotel
Dieu of Canada were young, well-born ladies from a hospital at
Dieppe. The Marquis de Sillery, a wealthy Knight of Malta, who
had devoted himself and all his riches to the service of the Church,
founded a mission at the little cove still bearing his name, a few
miles above Quebec. In 1642, the town of Montreal, on the site
before chosen by Champlain, owed its foundation to missionary
enterprise. A large sum of money was raised in France, where
the annual " Relations", or reports of religious progress among the
Indians, were arousing much enthusiasm, and a new settlement was
made on the island in the St. Lawrence, under the name of Ville
Marie de Montreal. The place was then an outpost of great peril,
unconnected with the profitable fur-trade, and entirely due to zeal
for the conversion of souls. The governor was a brave and devout
soldier, the Sieur de Maisonneuve, who himself felled the first tree
at the clearing of the ground, and worked with spade and mattock
at the trench round the little fort.
The arm of flesh, however, was needed by these Christian
pioneers, and the missionaries were soon involved in trouble with
CANADA — EARLY HISTORY. 185
the fierce Iroquois, who were beginning to lose their dread of fire-
arms, and had even obtained muskets from Dutch traders on the
river Hudson. In 1648, a mission-station among the Hurons on
the shores of Lake Simcoe was destroyed by fire, and the Jesuit
father died a dreadful death. The fort erected by Montmagny,
Champlain's successor as governor of Canada, at the mouth of the
river Richelieu, was attacked by seven hundred warriors, who
advanced to the very loopholes of the stockade, fired their guns
through them, and were only repulsed by desperate efforts. Ever
on the watch for the colonial hunter, fisherman, or farmer, they
made life a burden even to those who dwelt within range of the
cannon mounted at Quebec, Three Rivers, and Montreal. The
allies of the French, the Algonquins and Hurons, were constantly
harassed by their implacable foes, the Iroquois, in whose lodges
many a French scalp hung alongside those of Indian victims. Two
of the most famous Jesuits, Brebeuf and Lallemand, were murdered
by tortures spread over many hours. Amidst these terrors, the
missionaries still made their way inland, and by the year 1660 they
had mapped the outlines of Lakes Erie and Superior, and had
viewed the waters of Lake Michigan. Another Jesuit, named
Jogues, lived as a prisoner among the Mohawks, escaped and
returned to France, went back to the scene of his labours, and was
murdered, in 1644, by Indians of the same tribe. In spite of all
opposition, some thousands of Indians were converted to the Chris-
tian faith, but this success only aroused the keener hatred of the
Iroquois, who attacked the villages of the Christianized natives,
slew the people by hundreds, and for ten years, from 1650 to 1660,
established a reign of terror in the valley of the St. Lawrence.
In no long space of time, the Huron friends of the colonists
were almost swept away by the Iroquois, and in 1660 those deter-
mined savages formed a plan for the utter destruction of the whole
colony. Twelve hundred warriors marched to attack by turns the
three military posts of Montreal, Three Rivers, and Quebec. The
heroic devotion of some settlers at Montreal saved the French
from ruin. Dulac des Ormeaux, a young man of twenty-two, went
forth with sixteen friends, after they had made their wills, confessed,
received the sacrament, and taken a solemn farewell. Their pur-
pose was to sacrifice their lives, if need were, in meeting the enemy
half-way. At the Long Sault rapid, on the Ottawa river, they were
1 86 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
joined by forty Christian Hurons and a few Algonquin friends, and
the party then manned an old redoubt, which was little more than
a breastwork of logs. The defence was improved by a facing of
sods, with loopholes left for musketry, and there they received the
attack of the enemy's vanguard, composed of two hundred men.
Five days and nights the post was held against incessant assaults,
by defenders hourly weakened through hunger, thirst, and want of
sleep. When more Iroquois appeared, the Hurons went over to the
foe, and for three days longer twenty heroes held out against seven
hundred savages. A breach was made at last, when but four
defenders remained alive, three of whom were mortally wounded,
and were at once burnt by the victors. The sole survivor was
carried off to die under torture. All the treacherous Hurons were
killed but five, who carried the news to the French settlements.
The desperate defence of the men who had fallen so far daunted
the foe that they retired to prepare new plans of extermination.
In 1659, the Abbe de Laval, a member of the house of Mont-
morency, arrived from France, to become, some years later, the
first bishop in Canada. He now held the post of vicar-apostolic,
and was a man of the greatest piety and zeal, wholly devoted to
the interests of the church and of the Jesuit order. His influence
was not, in some respects, beneficial to the progress of the colony,
which was soon distracted by quarrels between the ecclesiastical
and civil authorities, and it became plain that a change in the mode
of government was needed. In one point, at least, the Abbe and
the missionaries had right on their side. The fur-traders had long
been wont to pay for skins with the brandy which was mere destruc-
tion to the natives. The Jesuits waged constant war against this
evil, but could not obtain the assistance of the governor, and Laval
returned to France in order to appeal to the young king, Louis the
Fourteenth, who had lately assumed the reins of power. In conse-
quence, mainly, of Laval's intervention, the power of the Hundred
Associates came to an end early in 1663, and " New France" was
made a royal province.
Canada thus entered on a new and more prosperous stage of
her career, the first sign of which was a striking increase of her
military power against her native foes, the Iroquois. The interests
of the colony were now, in fact, under the charge of one of the
greatest men that France ever produced, Jean Baptiste Colbert,
CANADA — EARLY HISTORY. l8/
who, as chief minister of the French monarch, had charge at once of
the finances, the commerce, the agriculture, the marine, and the
public works of his country. He was one of the most enlightened
and far-sighted of all statesmen, one of the most inventive, sagacious,
and capable of all administrators. Born at Rheims in 1619, he
entered, in 1651, the service of Mazarin, who bequeathed him, ten
years later, to Louis, with the dying words, " I owe you, Sire, all
that I possess, but I repay you in some degree in giving you Col-
bert". Louis the Fourteenth, with all his faults, had a keen eye
for a great man, and he quickly found his advantage in the new
minister. His financial reforms were such that, in twenty-two years,
the net revenue was increased threefold, mainly through the sharp
measures taken with the " farmers" of the taxes. The whole system
of administration was organized anew, and the effects were quickly
seen in tillage and trade, in roads and canals, in colonies and legal
codes, in sciences and arts, in arsenals and seamen and men-of-war.
He it was who furnished Louis with the force that enabled him to
meet the fleets of England on the sea, and almost to dominate
Europe on land. The ultimate failure, part of which the great man
lived to behold, was due to the extravagance of a luxurious and
vicious court, and to the wars of ambition waged by the sovereign.
The heart and mind of Colbert were, amidst his countless and
incessant cares, largely devoted to colonial development, and proofs
of this were given alike in East and West — in America and India,
and on the African coasts. It was not long before Canada felt the
presence of a new pilot at the helm of French affairs. The new
governor was M. de Mezy, assisted by a council composed of him-
self, Laval, the royal intendant, and four others, the latter appointed
by the governor and the bishop, and holding office for a year. The
governor directed military affairs as the king's representative. The
intendant was the legal official, also controlling the finances, and
issuing ordinances on various matters of social and commercial life,
with the force of law. The elements of evil at work in the new
system proved to be disputes, arising from ill-defined limits of
power between the governor and the intendant, and between the
governor and the bishop, supported by the Jesuits. A new body
called the " Company of the West " had a monopoly of trade, in
return for which they were to defray the expenses of civil govern-
ment and of the religious system, strictly confined to the teaching-
1 88 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
of the Catholic faith. In the end, this commercial monopoly had
evil effects, but the measures taken by Colbert had immediate results
in securing the safety and the progress of Canada. The intendant,
Talon, was a man of ambitious views for the colony, guided by
sound sense, and he directed the attention of new-comers specially
to tillage, in order to make the settlement wholly independent of
extraneous support.
In 1665, eight hundred emigrants arrived from France, and this
considerable body was accompanied by a large accession of military
strength. Due provision for colonial progress was made in the
despatch from France of horses, sheep, horned cattle, and imple-
ments of agriculture. Canada was no longer to be left devoid of
resources either for the acquirement of wealth by the cultivation of
the soil, or for her own defence against external foes. A military
officer of experience and skill, the Marquis de Tracy, appeared
upon the scene as the king's lieutenant-general and viceroy of all
the French possessions in America. He brought with him four
companies of the regiment styled Carignan-Salieres, which had won
renown on Hungarian fields of battle against the Turks. It was
a striking and a stirring sight for the people of Quebec when these
fine troops, part of a total force of twelve hundred men, with glit-
tering equipments, amid pealing trumpets and the beat of drums,
marched up to the citadel. The soldiers had been raised in Savoy
under the Prince of Carignan, and were now commanded by M. de
Salieres as colonel. To this day the names of towns and counties
along the river Richelieu — Varennes and Berthier, Lavaltrie and
Vercheres — commemorate the former officers of the regiment,
stationed through that district to command, against the Iroquois,
the approaches to Montreal. A new governor, M. de Courcelles,
had now, in September, 1665, superseded de Mezy, through the
influence of Laval. The arrival of the troops and the fresh settlers
had more than doubled the scanty French population, by raising it
to four thousand.
De Tracy at once resolved on aggressive measures against the
native foe, the heretofore indomitable Iroquois. Three forts were
at once erected on the river Richelieu, the water-way by which, in
their birch-bark canoes, the enemy obtained access to Canada. Of
these, the works at Chambly and Saurel received the names of the
officers in command. Four companies of troops were sent to Three
CANADA — EARLY HISTORY. 189
Rivers, as the base of operations, with a hundred Canadian militia,
and some Indian allies. De Salieres had command of a detachment
stationed at Montreal, and, as the season was far advanced, and the
approaches were now barred against the enemy, the colonists could
rest in peace within reach of the fortified and garrisoned works.
It was in the depth of winter that the governor, De Courcelles,
marched to attack the Mohawks, a tribe of the Iroquois, in their
own abodes. On January 9th, 1666, he left Quebec with one hun-
dred men of the royal regiment, each carrying the usual accoutre-
ments, with a blanket, a pair of snow-shoes, and twenty pounds of
biscuit. The road lay at first up the frozen St. Lawrence, with a
sharp wind blowing that chilled the marchers to the bone. At
Three Rivers he was joined by more troops and some militia, the
latter being duly provided with moccasins of deer-skin or other
hide, over thick woollen wraps, called nippes, placed round the
stockings, against the intense cold. The soldiers, fresh from
France, had neither experience of Canadian wintry weather, nor
the same dress for resisting it, and suffered much both from the low
temperature and from the lack of practice in moving on show-shoes.
At the forts on the Richelieu, de Courcelles added more men to
his command, and a body of troops joined him from Montreal, by
a road sixteen miles in length, the first of its kind constructed in
Canada, leading to the fort at Chambly. The marching column
now consisted of six hundred, after the despatch to Three Rivers
of the men who had succumbed to the cold and fatigue. On
quitting Fort St. Therese, the last post on the Richelieu, the route
against the Mohawks lay through a region wholly unknown to the
invaders. The expected Algonquin guides had not appeared. De
Courcelles soon found that he was trespassing on the territory
lately ceded by the Dutch to the English at New York, when he
arrived, on February 2Oth, at the village of Corlaer, afterwards
Schenectady, on the Mohawk river. He had missed his road to
the haunts of the Iroquois, and, as the enemy were now aware of
his approach, and no surprise could be effected, the prudent course
lay in retreat. The French governor had found, to his disgust,
that the British held the country that he had expected to find in
the hands of the Dutch, and grumbled that "the king of England
did grasp all America", as his words are reported by a chronicler
and ear-witness. Sixty men were missing on arrival at the French
OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
forts, and the other brave men who had set the example of such
expeditions, to be often repeated during the next hundred years,
arrived at Quebec in a worn-out condition, after a journey of more
than eight hundred miles. During the retreat, the Iroquois had
waylaid their enemies, and a French detachment fell into an ambush,
with the loss of nearly twenty men in wounded and slain.
The Mohawks were, however, so far impressed by the intrepid
advance of their enemy, that the tribes of the " Five Nations",
when the spring had opened the waters to their canoes, sent an
embassy to Quebec. In July, 1666, peace was made, but De Tracy
had no faith in the sincerity of the Indians, and news at this time
arrived of an attack made upon a party of young officers from one
of the Richelieu forts. Two were killed, and four were made
prisoners. The chiefs at Quebec were at once arrested, and De
Tracy prepared for a signal act of punishment and intimidation.
The veteran soldier, nearly seventy years of age, organized, with
Talon's aid, a powerful expedition, composed of thirteen hundred
men, including Indian allies, Canadian militia, and six hundred
of the Carignan regiment, eager to avenge the wrongs of their
comrades. On October 3rd a start was made, and three hundred
boats carried the force along the Richelieu, and Lake Champlain,
to Lake St. Sacrament, afterwards Lake George. Then came a
march of nearly seventy miles through bush, along a narrow trail,
hampered by fallen trees, thick brushwood, and decaying stumps.
Swampy and rocky ground were also traversed, but over and
through all the troops, wearied and short of food, continued to drag
the two small field-pieces which formed their sole artillery. At one
point, the hungry men gladly came upon a fine grove of chestnut
trees, covered, in the autumn time, with nuts well-ripened. A com-
plete surprise of the enemy's villages could not be effected, as some
lurking Iroquois had seen De Tracy's Algonquin scouts. The
troops were formed in columns of attack, but four villages in suc-
cession were found deserted by the foe, who had left behind them,
in hasty retreat, a welcome supply of food. The French were
about to retrace their steps, when an Algonquin woman, who
accompanied the scouts, came forward to tell of the existence of
another Iroquois town. She had suffered much in girlhood as a
prisoner in their hands, and she was allowed to show the way at
De Courcelles' side. The place was soon reached, to be found also
CANADA — EARLY HISTORY. 191
abandoned, save by a single infirm old man. The collection of
houses, some of a hundred and twenty feet in length, for the
lodgment of several families, was surrounded by a triple stockade,
twenty feet high, flanked with four bastions. There were magazines
of stones for hurling at assailants, and large vessels filled with
water for the quenching of fire applied to the palisade. Large
quantities of maize were found in granaries underground, with
beans and Indian fruits, forming provision which, if the means of
transport had been at hand, would have fed all the French colonists
for months. All the arrangements of this chief village, including
utensils obtained from the Dutch, displayed a higher order of
social life than had yet been observed amongst Indian tribes. The
Te Deum was sung, the cross was erected, and the whole country
of the Mohawks was claimed by De Tracy for Louis the Four-
teenth. The troops carried off all the provisions that could be
thus removed, and, in all the villages, the rest of the food was
spoilt or destroyed. Everything was then given to the flames, and
hundreds of the hostile Indians are said to have perished from
famine during the next winter.
This great blow broke, for a time, the power of the Iroquois.
They were forced to understand that the French in the valley of
the St. Lawrence were no longer a feeble folk, to be preyed upon
and murdered at will; that the route to their territory was barred
by well-appointed forts; that the road to their own country was
known, and that severe punishment would promptly follow outrages
perpetrated upon the subjects of the French king. The returning
expedition was received at Quebec with exultant joy, and a treaty
was made which, for nearly a score of years, gave repose from
Indian foes to the long-troubled colony.
After settling the civil government on a firmer basis, De Tracy,
in 1667, handed over the charge of affairs to M. de Courcelles, and
returned to France. At the request of the Mohawks, some Jesuit
missionaries went to live among the tribe, and it is believed that
from this time the cruelty of the Indians, as displayed against
captured foes, was sensibly lessened. De Courcelles remained in
Canada as Governor until 1672, exercising supreme authority in
the council, and in disputes which might occur between the settlers
and the Seigneurs who held rights under the crown. His authority
extended over all ecclesiastics and all other persons of every class,
192 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Talon, the Intendant, being the administrator of civil and judicial
affairs.
Such prosperity now ensued as was possible under a system
that gave no play to the individual and independent efforts which
were bringing swift and sure success to the British colonies lying
to the south. One evil that arose was the greed of gain which
caused officials to engage in trade by methods that spread a moral
taint throughout the community. In outward material develop-
ment the country made advance, largely through Talon's efforts to
promote tillage, and the trade in timber, fish, and furs, with some re-
gard also paid to shipbuilding and manufactures. Exploration was
extended towards H udson's Bay and the great lakes. The population
was increased by the special measures undertaken for that end.
On the conclusion of peace with the Mohawks, most of the royal
troops returned to France, but four hundred disbanded officers and
men remained in the colony, settled on grants of land, and were
a valuable element for the cultivation of the soil and for frontier-
defence. The policy of emigration was conducted in a most
practical way for the growth of population. Between 1665 and
1670 cargoes of young women of good character were regularly
shipped as wives for settlers, and were, as a rule, immediately
married. In 1669, we find Colbert writing to Talon, "The king
sends 150 girls to be married, 6 companies of 50 men, 30 officers
or gentlemen, 200 other persons". In 1670, the minister writes to
De Courcelles, " Encourage early marriage, so that by the multi-
plication of children the colony may have the means of increase".
In the same year, Talon reports to the king, "165 girls arrived, 30
do not remain unmarried; 150 to 200 more asked for". Dowries
in the shape of stock for a little farm were given to the maidens;
bounties were offered for early marriages and for the largest
families; fines and certain civil restrictions were imposed on men
who remained unmarried. The result of these paternal proceedings
is seen in Talon's letter to Colbert in 1671, " Between 600 and 700
children born; inexpedient to send out girls next year". In 1669,
six companies of infantry, numbering two thousand men, arrived
from France as settlers. Officers were forbidden to return to the
old country, on pain of the king's displeasure, and those who settled
received rewards of money. Ladies also emigrated to become the
wives of officers and of other settlers of the higher class.
CANADA — EARLY HISTORY. 193
The modified feudal system of holding land in Canada at this
period of her history divided the country into large blocks, granted
to seigneurs, who were, as a rule, military officers, or men of noble
birth. Due fealty was paid to the king, or to the governor, as his
deputy, and when any land was sold, a fifth of the purchase-money
passed to the treasury. The feudal lord administered justice and
kept public order within his demesne, and was also required to
erect, if need were, a block-house for frontier-defence, and to pro-
vide the settlers with a corn-mill. Land-grants lay much along the
St. Lawrence and the Richelieu, with a narrow frontage to the
river, and extension far back. Subdivision by inheritance reduced
farms to mere strips of land, some of which still remain in the same
old French families. Feudal dues were paid to the seigneur in
produce, labour for certain days in the year, toll for grinding corn
at his mill, tithe on fish caught, and one-twelfth of the purchase-
money for lands sold. This system of tenure was not wholly
abolished until after the middle of the nineteenth century.
The efforts of Talon for the improvement of trade were
hampered by the restrictions of the " West India Company", and
the rules for promoting marriage were evaded by large numbers
of the young men, whose adventurous spirit drove them to the
forests, where they became coureurs de bois or "wood-rangers",
living as nomads on the shores of the great lakes. The com-
mercial monopoly of the Company, in its exclusive right of importa-
tion, could settle the price of needful foreign supplies, as well as
of the furs and fish which the country produced, and in 1671
Talon compelled the cessation of the restrictions on free importa-
tion and purchase of furs, granting, as compensation for the loss
of the skin-trade, a duty on buffalo-robes and beaver-skins. Efforts
were still made by the pious dwellers in Canada and by their
friends in France to spread religion among the natives, but the
oft-repeated experience of missionary-toil was not wanting to the
Jesuit fathers. The non-religious spread the vices and maladies
of Europe faster than the priests could impart the virtues of
Christianity and civilization. Drunkenness and small-pox made
havoc with the Indians. At Sillery nearly the whole body of
fifteen hundred Indians perished from the scourge, then unsoftened
by the skill of modern science. Tadousac and Three Rivers, the
annual resort of native dealers in furs, were, for a time, deserted.
VOL. I. 13
194 °UR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
In spite of all difficulties, it is claimed for Talon that when he and
De Courcelles returned to France in 1672, the cultivation of hemp
had begun in Canada, with the manufacture of soap and cloth, the
working of tanneries, the making of potash, and the brewing of
beer, and the building of ships at Quebec.
The new governor was a man of great note in Canadian history
— Louis de Buade, Count de Frontenac. On his arrival the popula-
tion of the colony amounted to nearly seven thousand. De Fronte-
nac, a soldier who had served his country with distinction in the
Dutch wars, was a man of masterful character, who found himself,
in maintaining what he held to be his rightful authority and position,
constantly at issue both with his colleague, the royal Intendant, and
with the Jesuits. Brave, energetic, able, courteous, dignified in
demeanour, speech, and written utterance, he won the confidence
of the colonists and the respect of the Indians. His cruel mode
of warfare in massacre and devastation, directed both against his
British neighbours and his Indian foes, did not arise from any
natural tendency, but was, unhappily, only too much in accordance
with the spirit of the school in which he was reared, and was often
dictated by deliberate policy. In his first term of government he
used slight resources, with little help from France, to great advan-
tage against enemies all around him, and firmly maintained, within
the limits of his colonial rule, the cause of law, justice, and order.
It was his lot to be called to administer a system of absolute rule
involving restrictions on civil freedom at every turn — on departure
from place to place within the colony, and outside its borders; on
family arrangements, domestic service, the prices of bread and
wine, and many other points. He did all that could be done in
such a position, and upheld the honour of his country, at great
odds against himself, in struggles both with British and with
native antagonists.
De Frontenac was a man who, like many other rulers, was
valued to the full when his place of action knew him no more.
His first term of office was marked by bold explorations, and it
was then that Louis Joliet, the first native French Canadian of
distinction, and Father Marquette, sailed for more than a thousand
miles down the Mississippi. Marquette died at his work among
the Miami Indians; Joliet, after journeying overland to Hudson's
Bay, and exploring the coasts of Labrador, received the island of
CANADA — EARLY HISTORY. 195
Anticosti as a grant, and there died in the first year of the
eighteenth century. In 1674 De Frontenac, applying at home
for troops, was told that he must drill the settlers, and train them
to war, as his sole reliance for the defence of the colony. Louis
the Fourteenth, at war with Holland, could send no men to Canada.
One of the governor's first acts was to establish a trading-post
and fort, long called by his own name, at the north-east corner
of Lake Ontario, where now stands the town of Kingston. The
main objects in view were to check British interference with the
fur-trade, and to stop one mode of ingress for the Iroquois. The
merchants of Montreal, Three Rivers, and Quebec were uneasy
as to the profits of their trade in furs, which the new post would,
to a large degree, intercept. Frontenac, however, compelled
these very men to supply a number of troops and canoes for the
enterprise in hand, and made his way up the rapids and amid the
maze of the Thousand Islands, with a great flotilla, to meet the
Iroquois deputies whom he had summoned. They were received
by him with military pomp and the roll of drums, amongst a bril-
liant staff, and the savages were quickly won by the imposing and
yet attractive demeanour of the new governor. Addressing them
as "children", he referred to French power, pointed to his cannon,
reminded them of the value of his friendship, recommended the
Christian religion, and bestowed presents of guns and tobacco for
the "braves", of prunes and raisins for their squaws and children,
and a hearty feast for them all, In ten days' time, to the astonish-
ment of the natives, the fort was nearly finished, with trench and
palisade, and, leaving a garrison behind, Frontenac returned to
Montreal, holding now the key of the great lakes. La Salle
undertook to defray the cost, and received in return the seigneury
of " Fort Frontenac ", with the privilege of trade, and the posses-
sion of adjacent lands. His profits were such that the wooden
erection was replaced by stone, and four small decked vessels, the
first ever seen on Lake Ontario, were soon afloat for the protection
of the trade.
In 1678 La Salle, with an Italian officer, De Tonti; a Recollet
friar, Father Hennepin; and the Sieur de La Motte, sailed from
Fort Frontenac in a ten-ton vessel, along the northern shore of
Ontario, to the Niagara river, and saw the mighty falls in the
depth of winter. The little ship was afterwards wrecked on the
196 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
lake, but another and larger one was built above the Falls, and
Lake Erie was reached in August, 1679. After escaping a violent
storm on Lake Huron the vessel was freighted with furs for a
return voyage to Niagara, while La Salle and most of his comrades
awaited her return. She was never seen again, and must have
foundered in a gale. In March, 1680, La Salle, with five com-
panions, started back by land, through snow-spread woods, a
thousand miles to Fort Frontenac, in order to procure equipments
for a vessel building for him on a lake in the Illinois country.
After dreadful sufferings La Salle alone arrived at Fort Frontenac,
leaving his comrades behind at Fort Niagara to recruit their
wasted strength. The needful supplies and men for his expedition
were obtained at Montreal, and the intrepid explorer again set
out westwards. He arrived at the lake to find that the town of
seven or eight thousand people, near which his vessel lay upon
the stocks, had been sacked and burnt by the Iroquois, who had
now almost annihilated the Hurons and other tribes, and were
seeking new conquests. For this end five hundred warriors had
come through the forests, from the lakes in the centre of what
is now the state of New York, to the prairies of the Illinois. The
women and children, as well as the men, were butchered, and the
graves were rifled of the dead for burning. We must here leave
the great explorer of the West thus far on the course which, as
already related, took him to the Gulf of Mexico.
In 1 68 1 the retirement of Colbert from office left Frontenac
without a strong support against Bishop de Laval, the Jesuits, the
Intendant Duchesnan, a mere tool of the prelate, and the council,
against all of whom he had been engaged in conflict. In the
following year he and Duchesnan were both recalled. The new
governor was a naval officer of good service, M. de la Barre, but
he was devoid of his predecessor's energetic promptitude. The
English colonists at this time outnumbered the French tenfold,
and were doing their utmost to divert the trade in furs from
Quebec and Montreal to Albany and New York. The governor
of New York, Colonel Dongan, was striving to rouse the Iroquois
against the French, but the shrewd savages, though they divined
the rising power of the British, were not inclined to help either
side to a supremacy which might prove fatal to the native powers,
and, in the seeming caprices of alternate support and opposition,
CANADA — EARLY HISTORY. 197
they really strove to hold the balance between the two nations
whom they had reason to dread. La Barre obtained two hundred
troops from France, and, in 1684, set out from Montreal with a
force of about one thousand men. His object was to punish the
Iroquois for attacks on the French forts in the west, but privation
and disease wasted his force, and he was obliged to accept terms
dictated by the enemy. His return to Quebec was quickly
followed by recall to France.
In 1685 the Marquis de Denonville, a brilliant cavalry officer,
went out as governor of Canada, and soon adopted vigorous
measures against the old foe. Furnished with six hundred royal
troops he marched to Fort Frontenac, and, after the perfidious
step of seizing fifty Iroquois chiefs at a conference, he took the
field from Montreal in June, 1687, at the head of nearly two
thousand men. The Seneca Indians were defeated with great
loss, their country ravaged and their villages burned, with vast
stores of food. The fort of La Salle at the Niagara was restored
and manned, and fortified posts were made at several other points,
to bar out both the British and the Iroquois. The attack upon
the Senecas brought into the field, inflamed with the utmost wrath,
the forces of the " Five Nations". Fort Niagara was entered
and destroyed, when the garrison, greatly reduced by sickness,
had abandoned the place. The Iroquois swarmed along the
frontier, lurked near every settlement, and burned some houses
close to Montreal. In 1688 above a thousand colonists were
killed by Indians, and the same number perished from scurvy and
small-pox. Negotiations for peace were begun by the French,
but they failed through the crafty treachery of a Huron, who
wished for war between the French and the Iroquois.
In August, 1689, came the dreadful massacre of Lachine, when
twelve hundred warriors landed near Montreal by night, surrounded
the village, and at daybreak butchered some hundreds of settlers,
men, women, and children alike, two hundred perishing in the
flames of the burning houses, and as many more being carried off
for torture. For two months the savages ravaged the country
around Montreal. The colony, by a succession of fearful blows,
was brought near to ruin, when Fort Frontenac was abandoned
and blown up, and the French hold on North America was once
more reduced to the posts at Quebec, Three Rivers, and Montreal.
198 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
It was time for a change of rulers to be made when De Fron-
tenac, during this disastrous year, arrived for his second term of
rule. He came at a critical time in the history of French Canada.
The colony numbered less than eleven thousand, and New England
alone contained a population at least eight times larger. War was
existing between the two countries in Europe, and De Frontenac
brought with him instructions from Louis the Fourteenth to seize
Albany, on the Hudson river, and to attack New York, then having
but a few hundreds of inhabitants. The old soldier and proconsul,
now approaching his seventieth year, devoted to his country's cause,
and endowed, as we have seen, with high capacity and a resolute
will, was just the man for the emergency. He carried back with
him the Iroquois chiefs who had been treacherously seized by
Denonville; and after having gained their good-will during the
voyage, he dismissed them to their old homes with the hope of
thus regaining the alliance of their people.
His first step was to assail the nearest British colonies. The
Abenaki Indians, who were French allies, attacked some New
England posts, and slew some two hundred persons. In February,
1690, an united French and Indian force issued from Montreal,
made a march of more than twenty days through snow-blocked
woods, over morasses and streams, and fell upon Corlaer (Schenec-
tady), the English frontier-town, on the river Mohawk, north-west
of Albany. Through a gross want of caution and vigilance on the
part of its inhabitants, the place was surprised at midnight and set
on fire, while over sixty men, women, and children were butchered
in their beds or in wild efforts to escape the tomahawk and sword.
A few made their way to Albany, and about thirty were taken
prisoners. It is pleasant to record that an English pursuit from
Albany, aided by a party of Mohawks, slew twenty-five of the
blood-stained invaders, and chased the rest to the gates of Mon-
treal. Two other English settlements, at Salmon Falls and Fort
Loyal (now Portland, in the state of Maine), belonging to New
Hampshire, were surprised by other French and Indian parties,
with the burning of all the buildings, and the death and capture of
some scores of people. The Iroquois, seeking revenge for the
wrongs of their British allies, ravaged the French frontier, and
much loss was caused at outposts and solitary villages.
In May the colonists of New England met at New York to
CANADA— EARLY HISTORY. 199
concert measures for retaliation on the French. No less an enter-
prise was undertaken than the conquest of Canada, by a military
force directed against Montreal by way of the Hudson valley and
Lake Champlain, under General Winthrop, while a powerful squad-
ron, commanded by Sir William Phipps, was to sail for Quebec.
Both attempts ended in failure. Winthrop's men were attacked in
camp near Lake Champlain by an outbreak of small-pox, and a
lack of canoes and provisions forced his retreat to Albany. A small
party made their way to La Prairie, near Montreal, and returned
after the slaughter and capture of some Canadians. De Frontenac
made vigorous preparations for the defence of Quebec by new
works, and in October, 1690, after a defiant reply to Phipps' sum-
mons for an immediate surrender, he repulsed his attacks both by
land and water. The guns of the fortifications were of too heavy
metal for the ship artillery, and the assailants on shore were driven
back by the fire of a much superior force, composed of three thou-
sand men, commanded by skilful officers. The British ships were
severely treated by the weather on their return, and after the wreck
of several vessels they arrived at Boston with the discredit of utter
failure. The exultant French struck a medal for their success, and
erected a church to " Notre Dame de la Victoire ", still to be seen
in the lower town of Quebec.
The frontier war continued with its usual atrocities. French
privateers were daring enough to cut out ships in the harbour of
Boston. The French and the English, as they hounded on their
Indian allies to their savage warfare, disgraced themselves by offer-
ing large rewards for scalps. In 1693 a British naval expedition,
aiming at the French American possessions, was secretly fitted out
in the dockyards at home. Repulsed with severe loss in an attack
on Martinique, the crews brought away with them the scourge of
yellow-fever, which destroyed on the voyage to Boston, and after
arrival there, two-thirds of the five thousand sailors and marines.
The projected attack on Quebec was abandoned, and Canada was
again safe from British assaults.
De Frontenac maintained with energy the struggle against the
Iroquois, rebuilding the western fort at Frontenac abandoned by
Denonville, and severely repulsing an Indian attack on Montreal.
In civil affairs he strongly asserted himself against the political pre-
tensions of the Bishop and the Jesuits, who were supported by the
200 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Intendant, M. de Champigny. In 1696, when he was in his seventy-
sixth year, the gallant old governor, with snowy hair, but his eyes
still bright with the fire of the spirit that burned within, was carried
on a litter at the head of a strong force marching against the Iro-
quois. The savages fired their town and fled, and the destruction
of stores of grain and other food left many of them to starve during
the next winter. In the same year a strong English work at Pema-
quid, on the coast of the territory now forming the state of Maine,
was taken by a French-Canadian squadron under d'Iberville.
The Treaty of Ryswick, in 1697, left France with a strong
position in America, as mistress of the posts on Hudson's Bay, to
be hereafter mentioned, of the country from Maine to Labrador,
and of the valleys of the St. Lawrence and the Mississippi. The
Indians of the west had been partly overcome, and De Frontenac
had recovered the French hold upon the great lakes. The work
of the governor was nearly done, one of his last official acts being
the assertion, against Lord Bellomont, the new governor of Massa-
chusetts and New York, of French claims to the allegiance of the
really independent Iroquois. This letter was dated on September
2ist, 1698, and the writer died about two months afterwards. He
had saved New France, on the verge of ruin, and he was buried in
the Recollet Church at Quebec amid general marks of sorrow and
high esteem.
In 1699 the Chevalier de Callieres, commandant of Montreal,
succeeded De Frontenac as governor. In September, 1700, peace
was concluded between the French and the Iroquois, and the treaty
was observed for several years. A fort was erected, to secure the
upper lakes, on the site of Detroit, and the new governor was soon
engaged in preparations to take his colonial part in the War of the
Spanish Succession, declared in Europe on May 4th, 1702. A year
later he died, and was succeeded by the Marquis de Vaudreuil, com-
mandant of Montreal, who had served in the country since 1687.
The cruel warfare on the frontiers was now resumed. In the
winter of 1703, a French and Indian force burned the town of
Deerfield in Massachusetts, slew nearly fifty of the people, and
dragged off more than a hundred as prisoners to Canada. In 1708
a border-raid of French and Indian troops was marked by the
atrocities perpetrated at Haverhill, near the Merrimac, again in
Massachusetts. The place was a cluster of cottages and log-huts
CANADA — EARLY HISTORY. 2OI
amid primeval forest. A small chapel rose in the middle of the
settlement, and in the last days of August the Indian corn was
ripening in a little clearing from the woods. At daybreak came
the whoop of war and the crack of guns. The minister Wolfe (a
name to be hereafter known to Canadian Frenchmen) was beaten
to death; his wife's skull was split by an Indian tomahawk, and
another savage dashed out the baby's brains against a stone. The
place, after further slaughter, was left in smoking ruins, but the
retiring foe were severely handled by some of the neighbouring
farmers who started in pursuit. The colonists of New England
henceforth waged a deadly war against the French and their Indian
friends, offering rewards for Indian scalps, and forming parties to
hunt down their enemies like beasts of prey. It was at this time
that the more adventurous and hardy of the British settlers became
the backwoodsmen of legendary story and romance, truly described,
however, as rivalling the best of the Indians in knowledge of
guerilla warfare and in crafty skill at tracking and circumventing
their foes. By sea, the colonists waged an incessant and unsparing
contest against every French settlement on or within easy reach of
the coasts.
In 1709, another plan for the conquest of Canada was formed
in New England, and help from the mother-country was sought.
Before that could arrive, Colonel Nicholson, Governor of Virginia,
with fifteen hundred men raised from his own colony, Maryland,
Pennsylvania, New York, and the New England settlements,
marched against Montreal. His route lay by Lake Champlain,
and his force was increased by a body of Iroquois. De Vaudreuil
prepared for a stout defence, but the British expedition failed
without any fighting, the camp at Lake George being attacked by
sickness, and the non-arrival of expected help from England
compelling a retreat. In the following year, Nicholson, as will be
seen, was successfully engaged elsewhere against the French. He
then went to England, and urged with effect a serious effort for
the conquest of Canada.
In June, 1711, a powerful fleet, composed of fifteen men-of-war
and nearly fifty transports and store-ships, with seven British
regiments, and two battalions of the Massachusetts militia, sailed
from Boston to attack Quebec, while two thousand men from other
colonies went overland, again commanded by Nicholson, on the
2O2 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
road to Montreal. The troops from England included some of
Marl borough's men who had won triumphs over the French at
Blenheim and Ramillies, Oudenarde and Malplaquet, but there
was no Marlborough in command of this expedition. The curse
of court-influence ruined the whole enterprise. The military force
was intrusted to a General Hill, brother of Mrs. Masham, the
favourite of Queen Anne. Sir Hovenden Walker, a man wholly
devoid of merit, had charge of the fleet. On August 22nd, from
careless navigation during a fog, eight of the transports went
ashore upon some reefs in the St. Lawrence, and were broken up
with the loss of many sailors and nearly a thousand troops.
Walker, after this disaster, in which the drowned men belonged
mainly to the splendid British regiments, calmly accepted the
misfortune, made no further effort, turned tail, and sailed home,
alleging that the loss of part had saved all the rest, since arrival at
Quebec would, he declared, in the absence of stores, " have left ten
or twelve thousand men to perish of cold and hunger". Nicholson
and his men, on hearing of Walker's retreat, returned home after
reaching Lake George.
Thus ended a disgraceful display of cowardice and imbecile
mismanagement, which has received scanty notice from English
historians. The enterprise had been undertaken with the utmost
deliberation. When Nicholson went home from his government
to advise the invasion, five Iroquois chiefs, in a court-costume, had
been presented to the queen. Handing to her, as pledges of their
fidelity, belts of wampum, composed of thin shells, about an inch in
length, used as money by the Indians, they engaged that their
fellows should fight along with the English for the conquest of
Canada. The brilliant St. John, Lord Bolingbroke, had devised
the plan, but, unfortunately for the due organization of the expedi-
tion, and for the choice of commanders, the minister, Godolphin,
was at this time removed from office to make way for Harley.
General Hill, known as "honest Jack Hill", was a jovial man
whom the great Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough, had taken in
hand as a boy and put to school. He then became, through her
influence, aide-de-camp to Marlborough, who "always said", the
Duchess affirms, " that Jack Hill was good for nothing". Mrs.
Masham, in spite of the duke's earnest remonstrance with the
queen, procured her brother's rise to the rank of brigadier, followed
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 203
by his selection for the command of the troops sent to Canada,
where he agreed with Walker, after the shipwrecks, in abandoning
all attempts to carry out the project After the failure, Hill became
Governor of Dunkirk, Lieutenant of the Tower, and a Privy
Councillor, while his colleague Walker, who published a foolish,
ill-written vindication of his own conduct, was struck off the navy-
list, and deprived of his half-pay. The history of this transaction
forms a striking contrast to that which will meet us nearly half a
century later.
French Canada had now received a new lease of life, and De
Vaudreuil, the governor, turned his attention to the strengthening
of her defences for any future struggle, and to extending the line
of western forts towards the valley of the Mississippi. The colony
now contained somewhat more than eighteen thousand people.
The Peace of Utrecht, signed on March i3th, 1713, gave to Great
Britain the final and full possession of Newfoundland, Nova
Scotia, and the Hudson's Bay territory, the history of which
colonies we will trace in a succeeding chapter.
CHAPTER VI.
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN (1713-1763).
Condition of Canada under De Vaudreuil and De Beauharnois — Beginning of the great
conflict — Louisbourg taken by the British, and afterwards exchanged — The Ohio
Company and Mr. George Washington — General Braddock's unfortunate expedition
against Fort Duquesne — Able services of Sir William Johnson — Arrival of De
Montcalm— Capture of Oswego by the French — Futile British expedition against
Quebec — Fort William Henry surrenders to the French — Massacre by the Indians
—Pitt's resolution to expel the French from Canada — Early career of General
Wolfe — Louisbourg again taken by the British — Failure of British attack on
Ticonderoga — Forts Frontenac and Duquesne captured — The British government
and the colonists resolve to attack Quebec — Fort Niagara captured— Siege and
final surrender of Quebec — Wolfe and Montcalm mortally wounded — Effort of the
French to recover Quebec — Montreal surrenders to the British — Canada ceded
to Britain by the Treaty of Paris.
We now come to deal with the struggle between two great
European rivals for the possession of power in North America.
In that view, we continue the history of French Canada in 1713,
remembering that the British colonies, at that date, are still, and
are to remain for sixty years, though with many ominous rumblings
204 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
of discontent, ever growing louder, outwardly loyal to the mother-
country, Great Britain. During the remaining twelve years of
De Vaudreuil's government of Canada, ending only with his death
in 1725, the country remained at peace, and the population rose to
the number of about thirty thousand. Industries were developed
in the making of woollen and linen cloth, salt, and iron. The
taste for horses, as instruments both of use and amusement, which
is still so marked among the French-Canadians, led to the intro-
duction of the sleigh for winter-locomotion, in place of the snow-
shoe. At Quebec arose the building of ships, which was afterwards
so greatly extended in that town. The fur-trade grew to a great
extent, and there was a large commerce in the export, to France
and to her West Indian islands, of timber, tar, pork, and flour, in
exchange for the manufactures of the home-country, and the sugar,
molasses, and rum of the tropical settlements in the Gulf of
Mexico. The Intendant exercised his minute and searching
arbitrary power in almost all the affairs of life, over the customs-
duties and the coin, the streets and roads, sanitary measures, such
as were then known, the sale of liquor, the exercise of trades, and
countless minor affairs.
This paternal system of rule had important effects in checking
the growth of that self-reliance and independent spirit which, with
some mischiefs, are fostered by popular government. Under the
rule of Louis the Fourteenth, who died in 1715, Canada had been
furnished with institutions devoid of all vitality, and her prosperity
was poor indeed compared with that which would have come under
a system of religious toleration, along with schools for the young,
a representative assembly, a sound method of land-tenure, in place
of feudality, and an extension of tillage, as in the British colonies,
instead of a chief devotion to the fur-trade. In 1722 we find
an able Jesuit missionary, Pere Charlevoix, comparing French-
Canadians and their capital with the New Englanders. Quebec,
with a population of seven thousand, is described as having a
society largely composed of an agreeable military element, and
much more brilliant than that of Boston. He admits that the
English " better knew how to accumulate wealth, but the French
had the more elegant manner of spending it". This epigrammatic
utterance explains to a large degree the failure of France as a
colonizing power.
CANADA
to illustrate the History
1503-1801
r L A N
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 2O5
De Vaudreuil was succeeded as governor of Canada by the
Marquis de Beauharnois, who was in power from 1725 to 1746.
These years, with the exception of the last three, were a time of
nominal peace, save in Acadia, where, as we shall see, the struggle
for possession between the colonists of the two great European
nations was carried on. The foreign policy of France was at this
time directed by the pacific Cardinal Fleury, and, for nearly all the
above period, Sir Robert Walpole, equally averse to war, was at
the head of affairs in Great Britain. The French in Canada
numbered, in 1726, about thirty thousand, and the people began to
push forward to the west, establishing a fort, and trade-relations
with the Sioux Indians, on the upper waters of the Mississippi.
The British governor of New York, Burnet, a son of William the
Third's friend, the famous Bishop of Salisbury, made a counter-
movement to the French position of advantage at Fort Niagara,
by erecting a strong -post at Oswego, on Lake Ontario. His
object was to direct the fur-trade with the Indians, by way of the
Mohawk and Hudson rivers, towards New York. Beauharnois
retorted by strengthening the works at Fort Niagara, and by the
erection of Fort Frederick, at Crown Point, on Lake Champlain,
near the British frontier.
In these acts of jealousy concerning trade we have the fore-
shadowing of the great conflict, arising in petty warfare between
the settlers of two great nations, and assuming large proportions
when the home-government, long neglectful of the issues involved,
gave serious attention to colonial affairs in North America. It
was clear already that the French were striving to keep the British
to the coast, and to secure for themselves the sole command of the
great west. The French meanwhile, outnumbered by the English
in the proportion of about twenty to one, neglected tillage for the
fur-trade, which was so attractive to those who loved exploration,
and to the restless spirits who have been already mentioned as
coureurs de bois. From the latter class sprang, through inter-
marriage with native girls, a number of half-breeds that formed for
a long period a considerable element in Canadian population.
The advance of the French westwards naturally caused collision
with Indian tribes, and there was much sanguinary warfare with
the Foxes, the Sakis, and other bodies of savages, against whom
the best allies of the Europeans were, in the end, the imported
206 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
scourges of strong drink and small-pox. In 1732, more than six
hundred French-Canadians died of this disease in and around
Montreal and Quebec. It was about this time that the minerals
of Canada began to be noticed in the working of bog-iron ore
found at Three Rivers, and the discovery of good copper near
Lake Superior. The outbreak, in 1743, of European war between
Great Britain and France was coincident, as we shall see, with
colonial conflicts. The neglect to define, in the Treaty of Utrecht,
a boundary-line between British Acadia, or Nova Scotia, and
French Acadia, afterwards New Brunswick, was one source of
trouble, but the main cause lay in the pretensions of the French,
backed by overt action, to claim as their own the whole basin of
the Mississippi as well as of the St. Lawrence. Their right lay,
as they asserted, in the discovery of new regions, and in charters
granted by French sovereigns — by Louis the Fourteenth, in 1712,
and, in 1716, by the ministers of his young successor, to John
Law's famous Mississippi Company, which, however, came to an
end within the space of four years.
The British colonies, having, to some extent, diversity of
interests, and being ruled by separate governments, were placed at
a disadvantage through the lack of united spirit and action. It
was in 1745 that the New England colonies, with assistance from
the home-country, at last made a determined and successful effort
against the chief French stronghold adjacent to their coasts. This
was the fortress of Louisbourg, in Cape Breton Island, whose
privateers preyed, with disastrous effect, upon the growing com-
merce of the British in those waters. Shirley, the energetic and
enterprising Governor of Massachusetts, appointed to his office in
1740, resolved, in 1745, to make an effort for the capture of the
French basis of operations. Four thousand troops, raised in
New England, were placed under the command of Mr. William
Pepperell, a native of the colonies descended from a Devonshire
family. He was a colonel of militia, occupied during peace in
mercantile affairs. Shirley had learned, from certain English
prisoners returned from Louisbourg, that the French garrison was
ill-disciplined and discontented. An element of religious enthusi-
asm had part in the expedition. George Whiten" eld, the Methodist
preacher, was at that time stirring New England by his eloquence,
and he furnished, on request, a motto for one of the regimental
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 2O/
flags, in the words Nil desperandum, Christo duce. The Puritan
soldiers who went forth against the French were, in their own
eyes, engaged in a warfare against the " image-worship " of the
Catholics.
The approaches to Louisbourg by sea were well known to
many of the mariners of Massachusetts, and good hopes of success
were aroused. The fortress was placed at the eastern side of the
island, on a point of land which commanded the harbour lying to
the north and east. The works were more than thirty feet in
height, surrounded by a ditch of eighty feet in width, and mounted
with over one hundred and seventy cannon and mortars. The
harbour was further protected by an island-battery of thirty heavy
guns, and the land-side of the fortress was defended by a tract of
low marshy ground which could be swept by shot from the enemy's
ramparts. The men of Massachusetts are, to this day, justly
proud of their sires who, in the existing condition of the colony as
regarded warlike resources, could even conceive the idea of attack-
ing such a formidable stronghold. In truth, however, the New
England colonists were forced to the enterprise. Their fisheries
and their commerce were at stake; their lives and property on the
seaboard were ever open to attack and destruction. The represen-
tations made by Shirley to the government at home were not
without effect, and in January, 1745, orders were despatched to
the naval officer on the West Indian station, Commodore Warren,
to sail with his fleet to the scene of action, and co-operate with the
troops. The colony of New York furnished supplies of provisions,
with a battery of ten eighteen -pounder guns. The colonies
supplied a fleet of transports, with thirteen armed brigs and sloops,
and this part of the armament started for Gabarus Bay, to the
south of Louisbourg, in the last week of March, without awaiting
the arrival of Warren. The ships were detained, at that early
part of the season, for some weeks by the thick ice found off Cape
Canso, at the eastern point of Nova Scotia. A landing was there
made, and the time of delay was well employed in drilling the
militia, and in rebuilding and arming a small fort which had been
destroyed by the French. At the end of April, when the sea was
clear, Warren arrived with four men-of-war, and was afterwards
joined by six others from England and Newfoundland, with which
fleet of ten sail, carrying from forty to sixty guns each, he cruised
2O8 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
oft" Louisbourg to intercept supplies and to prevent intelligence
from reaching the fortress. The French garrison consisted of six
hundred regulars and one thousand colonial militia. Their com-
mander, Duchambon, was devoid alike of energy and skill, a
circumstance much in favour of assailants who, however zealous,
knew nothing of scientific siege.
On April 3Oth, a landing was made on the shore beyond the
harbour, to the north-east of the fortress, the invaders charging
through the surf and driving off the French. The first success
obtained was the ignition of some warehouses filled with turpentine,
pitch, and tar, the suffocating smoke of which drove off the garrison
of a battery mounting thirty heavy guns. The enemy spiked the
cannon, but the touch-holes were redrilled by the English, and a
destructive fire was opened on the foe. The landing of the British
artillery and stores was the severe work of fourteen days, and on
fourteen nights afterwards the siege-guns and ammunition were
being dragged by the sailors on sledges over the marshy ground,
to be placed in battery on the landward (westward) or weaker side
of the fortress. On May i8th, the French ship Le Vigilant of 64
guns, laden with military stores much needed by the garrison, was
captured by the British fleet, in view of the besiegers' camp. Two
days later, the British were repulsed in a boat attack on the island-
battery at the centre of the harbour entrance, but the bombardment
was maintained with vigour, and the island-battery was silenced by
fire from the northern shore. By the middle of June the fortress
was becoming indefensible. Many of the guns were dismounted,
works were destroyed, the town was utterly ruined. On June
i yth, after seven weeks' siege, the French commandant surren-
dered on the usual honourable terms; the garrison, after the loss
of about 300 men, being conveyed to France on British ships. It
is impossible not to quote, from Kingsford, the able historian of
Canada, the "grace before meat" uttered by Mr. Moody, a
regimental chaplain, on occasion of a banquet to the officers of the
expedition. His sermons, like those of many Puritan preachers,
were extremely lengthy, and the guests had some reason to dread
'his use of the opportunity now afforded. He was an aged man,
selected to say grace as the uncle of Mrs. Pepperell, wife of the
victorious commander who was presiding at the feast. The
singularity and shortness of the utterance took all hearers by
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 209
surprise, and caused its preservation : " Good Lord, we have so
many things to thank Thee for that time will be infinitely too
short to do it. We must, therefore, leave it for the work of
eternity. Bless our food and fellowship upon this joyful occasion,
for the sake of Christ our Lord. Amen ". The non-combatants,
numbering over two thousand people, were taken to France along
with the troops.
The news of this great success, the capture of Louisbourg, was
received at Boston with exultant joy. The tidings arrived at one
in the morning of July 3rd, and the citizens were awoke, at the
early dawn of a midsummer day, by the peals of bells that were
ringing around. The success of the men of Massachusetts was
not ended even with the capture of the fortress. The French
colours were craftily kept flying on the ramparts, and three richly-
laden vessels from the Eastern seas were decoyed into harbour and
taken, with cargoes worth more than half-a-million pounds sterling.
The account of the exploit was also greatly welcome in London,
and brought promotion to the men in command. Warren became
rear-admiral of the blue. Pepperell was made a baronet, and both
he and Shirley, receiving commissions as colonels in the line, were
allowed to raise regiments for service in the royal forces. The
governor of Massachusetts enrolled the men who formed the 5oth
Regiment, now the Queen's Own or Royal West Kent, whose
colours, with the inscription, Quo Fas et Gloria ducunt, were
thereafter to be seen on the Peninsular fields of Corunna and
Vittoria; waving in front of the Sikhs at Aliwal and Sobraon;
torn with shot at Alma and at Inkerman; victorious over mutineers
and rebels at Lucknow. Pepperell's recruits were the origin of
the 5ist Regiment, the King's Own or Yorkshire Light Infantry,
whose flags, with the injunction, Cede nullis, were seen at
Minden and Salamanca, Vittoria and Waterloo, with Roberts in
Afghanistan, and at the completion of the British possession of
Burma.
In May, 1746, the new acquisition was garrisoned by the two
regiments raised by Pepperell and Shirley, and by two other
regiments brought from Gibraltar. The fisheries and the trade of
the British colonies were, for the time, secured, and our country-
men, so far as their exertions could avail them, had become
supreme on the North Atlantic. It seems certain also that, from
VOL. I. 14
210 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
this time forward, the men of New England were animated by
that consciousness of strength which caused them, in the next
generation, to assume so bold an attitude against the mother-
country.
The loss of Louisbourg caused dismay and indignation in
France. The government, intent to recover both Cape Breton
and Nova Scotia, fitted out a powerful fleet of about forty ships of
war at La Rochelle, and placed more than three thousand troops
on board the transports. It was an armada which was expected
not only to effect the retrieval of losses, but to inflict condign
punishment on the audacious New Englanders by the capture or
destruction of Boston, and by the ravaging of the coast settle-
ments. The expedition was placed under the command of the
Due d'Anville, and sailed from France towards the end of June,
1 746. The enterprise ended in total failure. The squadron was
delayed by foul weather in crossing the Atlantic, and then, at the
beginning of September, the ships were dispersed by a severe
storm off Sable Island, on the east of Nova Scotia. Some were
wrecked on the reefs; two, driven back to the coast of France,
were taken by British cruisers. Many hundreds of men perished
on shipboard from disease; D'Anville died of apoplexy, and the
Marquis de la Jonquiere, who was going out as the new governor
of Canada, ordered the remnant of the fleet to return to France.
The Canadian French who had been dispatched to co-operate with
their countrymen by the overland route to Nova Scotia, effected
nothing beyond successful attacks upon the British posts at Sara-
toga and other frontier points, with the usual cruel raids upon
isolated and defenceless settlers. The British losses of this
character, largely due to the neglect of the New York authorities,
were partly avenged by our Iroquois allies.
Early in 1747, however, while the snow lay deep on the ground,
a Canadian force effected a brilliant surprise of a body of Massa-
chusetts troops stationed at Grand Pre in Nova Scotia. About
five hundred officers and men were quartered among the people,
under the command of Colonel Noble. In spite of warnings from
friendly Acadians, little precaution was taken. At three o'clock in
the morning of February nth, while it was yet dark, and a fierce
storm of snow was raging, a body of about 250 French, aided by
sixty Indians, all of whom had marched, with wonderful hardihood,
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 211
for seventeen days in the depth of winter, burst upon the place,
and caught the men of Massachusetts in their beds. Colonel
Noble was killed early in the fight, and, with the loss of but
twenty men, the enemy killed and wounded about one hundred
and forty Englishmen, and carried away nearly sixty prisoners.
The rest of the New England troops were in a stone-built house,
which could not be forced open or fired, and this body might have
greatly damaged the exhausted Canadians in their retreat, but for
the want of snow-shoes, without which it was impossible to keep
pace with men duly equipped for winter travel.
The French government, undeterred by the disastrous fate of
D'Anville's expedition, prepared two squadrons to act against the
British West Indies, and in Canadian waters, but both were
defeated off Cape Finisterre by Admirals Anson and Warren, with
the loss of six French men-of-war, six large Indiamen, several
transports, great store of arms, accoutrements, and money, and the
unlucky De la Jonquiere, who was again attempting to reach
Canada and take up his duties as governor, but was now carried
prisoner to England. The rule of Canada was, in June, 1747,
intrusted to M. de la Galissonniere, and, in the following year,
the war was brought to a temporary close by the Treaty of Aix-la-
Chapelle. The New England colonies were disgusted and dis-
mayed by the restoration of Louisbourg to France, in exchange
for Madras, which had been taken from Britain by the French and
their native allies in the Carnatic. The public opinion of Great
Britain regarded the retrocession of the Cape Breton fortress as a
sacrifice of the national honour, but the truth was that this country
had been drawn into a continental war with which her interests
were little concerned. In that war her troops had been, in the
main, unsuccessful, and the government were eager for peace on
any endurable terms. Louisbourg was not destined to remain
much longer a menace to British subjects in North America.
The British and French colonists regarded the peace as nothing
but a truce which delayed an inevitable and decisive struggle.
The new French governor, a bold and sagacious man, had
ambitious views for his country's future in North America, and
did not fail to assert them against British claims. In March,
1 749, a charter was granted by George the Second to an " Ohio
Company", formed in Virginia, with a large assignment of land in
212 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
that river-basin. The company intended to establish a settlement
at the junction of the rivers Alleghany and Monongahela, and a
battalion of troops was raised under the command of a man whom
Carlyle calls "a steady-going, considerate, close-mouthed, young
gentleman ". The name of this personage was Mr. George
Washington, of Virginia. La Galissonniere, getting wind of this
Ohio project, sent an officer with 300 men to occupy the region by
burying plates of lead up and down, claiming the whole of the
land, " from the farthest ridge, whence water trickled towards the
Ohio", for France; by nailing the Bourbon lilies, in metallic form,
to the forest trees; by forbidding the Indians to trade with the
English, and calling upon the governor of Pennsylvania to prevent
intrusion into French territory. It was well for Great Britain that
a certain man named William Pitt was making his way at this
season in political affairs. La Jonquiere, released from England
at the peace, superseded Galissonniere as governor, but he and
his intendant, Bigot, were men of evil repute, the former for the
meanest avarice and the most miserly habits, the latter for gross
extortion and dishonesty, combined with a profligate and wasteful
mode of life worthy of a courtier of the fifteenth Louis.
A better prospect for the French-Canadians came with the
arrival at Quebec, in July, 1752, of M. Duquesne as ruler. He
came out with instructions from his government to make a firm
stand against British movements towards the west. The agents
of the Ohio Company had begun to erect a fort at the junction of
the two rivers forming the Ohio, when, in February, 1754, a
French commander, with five hundred men, appeared and took the
place. They then completed the work under the name of Fort
Duquesne. The French governor had established a post at
Presqu'ile (now Erie) on Lake Erie; a work called Fort le Boeuf,
on the site of Waterford; and a third, Fort Venango, southwards,
on French Creek. The most active and observant of the British
colonial governors did not fail to direct the attention of the home-
government to these menacing preparations. Shirley of Massa-
chusetts, and Dinwiddie of Virginia, induced the " Lords of
Trade" in London to send out a circular letter to the American
colonies, recommending the adoption of a joint policy of defensive
and offensive action. Governor Dinwiddie employed the services
of young Mr. Washington, who erected a work called Fort
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 213
Necessity, and strove in vain, with an inferior force, to resist
the French encroachments. In July, 1754, he was obliged to
surrender on honourable terms, he and his men being allowed to
return to Virginia. The French were, for the moment, victorious
on the Ohio.
At the close of this year, two regiments of the line were
ordered from England, under the command of General Braddock,
a name of sinister sound in the history of those times. In January,
1755, the 44th and 48th Regiments, each five hundred strong, took
ship at Cork for Virginia, with the purpose of "protecting the
trade of the English possessions, as one of the sources of national
wealth". The French government responded by the dispatch of
three thousand men, on board of eighteen ships of war, most of
which arrived safely at Louisbourg or Quebec. The two countries
were on the eve of the great struggle known as the Seven Years'
War, but no declaration of hostilities had been formally made.
There were five chief objects in view of the British colonists
and the home-government. In the first place, Fort Duquesne was
the key to the region lying west of the Alleghany Mountains, and,
so long as that post was held by the French, Virginia and Pennsyl-
vania were exposed to the attacks of them and their Indian allies.
The possession of Louisbourg was a constant threat, as we have
seen, to New England, and gave to the French the control of the
Newfoundland fisheries. The forts of Crown Point and Ticon-
deroga, on Lakes Champlain and George, covered the road to
Canada, and afforded to the enemy a base for operations against
New York and other colonies. Fort Niagara, lying between
Lakes Erie and Ontario, commanded the trade in furs with the
Indians of the upper lakes and the north-west. The fortress of
Quebec was the stronghold which commanded the St. Lawrence,
and mainly decided the possession of Canada.
The government in Great Britain had made an unwise choice
in appointing Braddock to the chief command in North America.
The Duke of Cumberland, himself a general not renowned for the
victorious issue of his campaigns, save against Highland rebels,
believed in the capacity of Braddock, who was, in 1755, over sixty
years of age, with forty-five years of service. This luckless man's
character has been harshly treated by Franklin and other writers,
and justice demands abatement of some of their strictures. The
214 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
British general's plan of operations, formed in council with Shirley,
Dinwiddie, and other colonial governors, was comprehensive and
intelligent. The doings of the colonial troops against the French
in Nova Scotia will be afterwards recorded. Apart from that
province, a body of Mohawk Indians was to be enrolled by
William Johnson, a colonist of New York province, who had
married the sister of a famous Mchawk chief, known in border-
warfare by the English name of Joseph Brant. Johnson's skill in
dealing with the natives was remarkable in a British subject, and
he was adopted into the Mohawk tribe, becoming one of their
great sachems or chiefs. His presence on the frontier was a
bulwark of strength for the cause of his countrymen. He was now
appointed to lead the forces against Crown Point, on Lake Cham-
plain. Governor Shirley was to advance against Fort Niagara.
Braddock himself undertook the task of mastering the Ohio valley
and the road to the north-west. The first step towards this
achievement would be the reduction of Fort Duquesne.
All these operations were to be simultaneous, with a view to
the distraction of the French forces in various directions. Brad-
dock's fault was one which has often betrayed the commanders of
regular troops in campaigns against an enemy wholly or partly
composed of natives skilled in guerilla warfare. He was over-
confident, and, being warned both by Franklin and by Washington
of the dexterity and prowess of the Indian warriors, he expressed,
along with some contempt for the "raw American militia", a
perfect reliance upon "the king's regulars and disciplined troops ".
The British general was, however, ill-supported by the colonial
authorities, especially those of Pennsylvania and Maryland, who
withheld supplies of food, and failed to furnish the Indian rein-
forcements who would have been invaluable as scouts. At this
time, the Governor of Canada, in succession to Duquesne, was the
Marquis de Vaudreuil, a native of Quebec, and son of the former
ruler. The veteran troops recently arrived from France were
commanded by Baron Dieskau, an officer of distinguished service
under Marshal Saxe, one of the foremost generals of that age,
victorious over the British and their allies at Fontenoy and
Laufeldt. Washington, commanding some companies of Virginian
militia, was on Braddock's staff.
Early in June, 1755, the British force of about two thousand
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 21 5
three hundred men started from Fort Cumberland, on the River
Potomac, for a march of 120 miles, through a rocky and woody
country, to Fort Duquesne. A hundred pioneers cleared away the
forest for the advance, during which the troops encountered great
toil, and had to protect a train of artillery and baggage, straggling
over several miles of ground. A few men were picked up by the
French and Indians who hovered around, but no serious attack was
made for many days. The French commander at Fort Duquesne,
M. de Contrecceur, had no hope of making a successful defence,
when one of his captains, M. de Beaujeu, proposed to waylay the
invaders in the woods, with a strong party of Indians and a few
French. A force of about 640 Indians, with 159 French-
Canadians, and 70 regular troops, was put under his command,
and he sallied forth to execute the plan which he had formed. On
June gth, Braddock, who had pressed forward with the lighter
artillery and baggage, and a force of nearly fifteen hundred of his
best men, was within eight miles of Fort Duquesne, when heavy
firing was heard in front, on ground covered with dense forest and
thick bushes, and intersected by ravines. An incessant fire, from
unseen marksmen, was poured into the column, and confusion soon
prevailed. The front, both flanks, and rear were assailed. Many
officers had fallen, as they strove to extricate their men, and form
a front this way or that; and Braddock, after having five horses
shot under him, and giving the order for retreat which was
absolutely needful, received a shot in the lungs, and fell to the
ground. He bade those around him to let him die where he lay,
but was placed on a fresh horse and taken off the field. He
expired four days later, on the retreat to Fort Cumberland. This
terrible affair, in the space of two hours, cost the British 26
officers and 430 soldiers killed, and 37 officers and 380 rank and
file wounded. All was lost except the clothes worn by the
survivors, 26 officers and 557 soldiers of the advance-column. All
the cannon, baggage, and stores, with the military chest containing
^25,000, became the prize of the victors. Washington, with the
colonial troops, who displayed both steadiness and skill in the
encounter, was in the thick of the fighting, but escaped unhurt.
One evil result of this disaster was the renewal of the savage
border-warfare, in which the tomahawk and torch wrought fearful
havoc amongst the outlying settlers of Virginia and Pennsylvania.
2l6 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
A military consequence was the failure of the expedition sent
against Fort Niagara. The militia, dispirited by the news con-
cerning Braddock, deserted their colours; the Iroquois turned
against the British cause, and Shirley, the commander, after
leaving a strong garrison at Oswego, was obliged to retire again
to Albany.
The honour of our arms, discredited for once in a defeat of
regular troops, was somewhat retrieved by Johnson at the head of
the colonial militia. In July, 1755, more than six thousand men,
chiefly from Massachusetts, with contingents from New York,
New Hampshire, and Rhode Island, were assembled at Albany.
Colonel Lyman led the troops for forty miles up the Hudson, and
there erected Fort Edward as a base for future operations. At
the end of August, Johnson joined the force, which was wholly
untrained, save in the use of firearms. Only one regiment was in
uniform, and all the men, in lieu of bayonets, carried tomahawks
in their belts. The expedition then in part advanced to Lac du
Sacrament, which now received its name of Lake George. Near
the southern point, Fort William Henry was constructed, and
preparations were made for an advance on the strong French
position at Crown Point, on Lake Champlain.
Meanwhile, Baron Dieskau, despatched from Quebec against
the British fort at Oswego, was diverted by De Vaudreuil to meet
the invaders. He advanced to the place called Carillon, afterwards
Ticonderoga, nine miles south of Crown Point. There a column
was formed, consisting of about 200 French regulars, 700 Cana-
dians, and 600 Indians, for the purpose of surprising Fort Edward,
where Dieskau's scouts had led him to believe that only five
hundred men lay. On September 8th, Johnson detached a
thousand men to intercept the enemy, but, marching without pre-
cautions, they fell into an ambush prepared by Dieskau, and were
roughly handled, driven back in flight, and hotly pursued. Johnson
made ready his men for defence, showing great skill in barricading
his camp with waggons and boats placed on their sides, in addition
to a screen of felled trees in front. Some cannon were in position
to sweep the road. Dieskau advanced bravely to the attack with
his handful of regular troops, expecting to be supported by the
Canadian militia and the Indians, but these irregulars dispersed
themselves into the bush, whence they maintained a fire on the
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 2 1/
British. The New Englanders, who were expert marksmen,
behaved with the utmost steadiness, and, after a fight of four
hours, the attack was severely repulsed. Dieskau, disabled by
three shots, was taken prisoner; Johnson was also wounded and
carried from the field. The chief loss of the French was in their
regular troops, who were almost destroyed; and the British
government, professing to regard the event as a counterpoise to
Braddock's disaster, somewhat magnified its importance in bestow-
ing upon Johnson a baronetcy, along with a grant of five thousand
pounds. He was to prove afterwards, through his ability and
determination, of valuable service during the war. At the close of
1755, the French held a very strong position in the command of
the Ohio valley, in the possession of Forts Frontenac, Niagara,
and Toronto, on or near Lake Ontario, and of Crown Point and
Ticonderoga, on Lake Champlain. During the winter, much
suffering was caused by the scarcity of food, due to the suspension
of trade and tillage in time of war.
An important event occurred in the arrival from France, in the
spring of 1756, of the Marquis de Montcalm as commander of the
Canadian forces. He reached Quebec in May, along with a fleet
conveying two battalions of royal troops, and large, much-needed
supplies of provisions and warlike stores. Montcalm, a man now
in his forty-sixth year, had won, in long military service, a high
reputation for courage and skill, and he was now to be ably
seconded by the Chevalier de LeVis, an officer of twenty years'
service, who had fought at Dettingen in 1743, and was also
marked by his sound training in war, energy, and courage. De
Vaudreuil, the governor, had already provided work for his military
assistants, in the resolve, if it were possible, to possess himself of
Oswego, and thus obtain the complete command of Lake Ontario,
and, at the same time, to keep a firm hold of Lake Champlain and
to acquire full possession of Lake George.
The strength of France in North America lay in the skill of
her officers, in the presence of three thousand regular troops in
Canada proper, and of nearly half that number at Louisbourg, with
two thousand well-trained men of the marine corps. The militia
were excellent for guerilla warfare, and distinguished by endurance,
patience, and courage in that form of service. The Indians, save
the tribes won over by Johnson, were devoted to French interests,
2l8 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
a result due to the tact and forbearance long displayed in French
dealings with the natives. The Indians were also impressed,
through Braddock's defeat, with a belief in British incapacity to con-
tend with success against the French and their native allies. The
British government, on their part, sent out, as commander of all the
troops in America, the Earl of Loudon, a painstaking man of small
ability and despondent nature, quite unfitted for the work in hand.
Montcalm was not long in making his presence felt by his foes.
While the colonial governors, in council at New York, were
planning attacks on the chief French positions, the Frenchman
was laying his plans against Oswego. Prior to his appearance in
the field, a British success was obtained by Colonel Bradstreet,
who had seen service in the first capture of Louisbourg, and had
then become a captain in Sir William Pepperell's new regiment.
This officer was sent in June with a large supply of provisions and
other stores for Oswego. After delivering his charge in safety, he
was attacked on his return by seven hundred French and Indians
from Fort Frontenac, but he repulsed them with severe loss, and
made his way back to Albany. Montcalm, after strengthening the
works at Ticonderoga, and placing De Levis there in command of
three thousand men, of whom half were regular troops, gathered
at Fort Frontenac a force for special service. On August 4th, he
set out with three thousand royal troops, militia, and Indians, for
Oswego. The British forts had been neglected, and were feebly
garrisoned by a few hundred raw recruits of Pepperell's regiment,
and a thousand colonial militia. No guard was kept, and at mid-
night on the loth, the formidable French force landed near the
place. Two days later a formal siege was begun, and one of the
forts, quite untenable against heavy cannon, was promptly aban-
doned by the British. The commandant, Colonel Mercer, was
shot dead on the i4th, the chief artillery officer was also killed, and
the spirit of the garrison thereupon succumbed. The surrender
of Oswego gave the French over 1600 prisoners, including 120
women and children. The great booty taken comprised seven
armed ships, two hundred bateaux or barges, more than a hundred
cannon, and a large supply of provisions, with the military chest
containing nearly twenty thousand pounds. Five flags were placed
in the churches at Montreal, where they remained until they fell
again, by conquest, into British hands.
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 2 19
This reverse, disgraceful to the British colonial authorities, who
had ample forces at their disposal, greatly raised the reputation of
Montcalm, and caused the abandonment, on the part of his spiritless
opponents, of all the intended expeditions against French posts.
A man was clearly wanted to bring new energy into the colonial
war, and, happily for Great Britain, he was not long in appearing.
In November, 1756, the feeble, ignorant, and selfish Duke of
Newcastle ceased to be prime minister, and in June, 1757, with
the same man as nominal head, William Pitt, as secretary of state,
assumed the real power in controlling affairs.
During the winter which followed the capture of Oswego,
where all the works were utterly destroyed, the French and
Indians ravaged the British frontiers, and burnt four armed vessels,
hundreds of boats, and large stores of supplies, almost under the
guns of Fort William Henry. A gallant defence of the fort, with
a feeble garrison, by Major Eyre, against a powerful force, some-
what retrieved the diminished credit of British arms. Early in
1757, a strong armament left England, to co-operate with the
colonial forces in an attack on Quebec. There were fifteen sail of
the line and some frigates, under an admiral named Holbourne,
escorting fifty transports carrying more than six thousand troops
under a General Hopson. The expedition, one with which Pitt
had nothing to do, arrived at Halifax early in July, and broke up
in the autumn without producing any effect except a general
impression of the imbecile mismanagement of British naval and
military affairs. In August, Loudon sailed off to New York,
with most of the regiments, leaving some to garrison Halifax, and
other points in Nova Scotia. Holbourne, with his men-of-war,
went to Louisbourg, thought the French fleet there too strong to
attack, and returned to Halifax. Reinforced from England, the
admiral resorted again to Louisbourg, and challenged the French,
but could not tempt them out of range of the fortress guns. The
British fleet was then severely treated by a storm. Eleven vessels
were dismasted; hundreds of cannon were heaved overboard; a
frigate was wrecked, with the loss of many lives; and the squadron
was scattered, in a crippled state, to New York, Halifax, and
England.
The patience of the British public at home was destined to be
severely tried, not only by this ignominious failure, but by another
220 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
French success due to the skill and energy of Montcalm. Fort
William Henry, at the southern end of Lake George, was garri-
soned by six companies of the 35th Regiment, under Colonel
Monroe. Webb, the commander at Fort Edward, on the east
bank of the Hudson, nearer to the British frontier, heard that
French troops were being massed at Ticonderoga, and despatched
a reinforcement of one thousand men, mostly provincial troops,
with four guns, to the threatened post. On July i8th, 1757,
Montcalm arrived at Ticonderoga, and assumed command of the
troops. A British force of 300 men, moving in boats up Lake
George, fell into an ambush of Indians in canoes, and was dis-
persed with the loss of two-thirds of the number by killing,
drowning, or capture. This disaster was due solely to the want of
due order and precaution.
On July 28th, De Levis, Montcalm's second in command,
advanced in charge of nearly 3000 men, followed by his chief with
a second and larger force. On August 3rd, Fort William Henry
was summoned to surrender, but Monroe declared that he would
hold the post while he had life, and at the same time sent off
pressing messages to General Webb, who lay at Fort Edward,
fifteen miles distant, with nearly two thousand men. The French
had with them 36 cannon and 4 mortars, and, though the walls of
the British fort were thirty feet thick, composed of timber filled in
with gravel and stones, the works could not resist heavy guns in
a regular siege. The real weakness of the British position lay in
the fact that the country had been stripped of forces for Loudon's
expedition to Halifax, and it was impossible for Webb to march,
in the face of De Levis's powerful body of men, to the relief of his
colleague at Fort William Henry. There could be only one end
to Montcalm's attack. Trenches were opened on August 5th,
and a severe fire was maintained from the French heavy guns,
howitzers or shell-guns, and mortars. The fire was steadily
returned from the fort until many of the guns had burst and the
two mortars were useless. The ammunition was nearly spent, and
more than 350 men were killed and wounded. On August 9th an
honourable capitulation was made, and over two thousand British
soldiers, with their arms and colours, marched out, not as prisoners
of war in the strict sense, but on the undertaking not to serve
against the French for eighteen months to come.
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 221
In explanation of the tragical scene which ensued, it must be
observed that the British had no ammunition, and only the sur-
vivors of the 35th Regiment were armed with bayonets. There
were nearly two thousand Indians present with the victors, and
the savages, after plundering the fort, were eager for blood,
prisoners, and the seizure of the personal effects which the surren-
dered troops were carrying off, according to agreement, to Fort
Edward. The savages forced their way into the hospital, and
murdered and scalped the wounded, who were in charge of a
French surgeon. The departing column was assailed by Indians
drunk with the rum found within the fort. Women and children
were seized before the faces of the French escort, and many were
killed. Fifty of the troops, by De Levis's account, were murdered,
and numbers were plundered of their dress and accoutrements.
The mulattoes, negroes, and Indians in the British ranks were at
once killed and scalped, and all the efforts of De Levis and Mont-
calm, with other French officers, were insufficient to allay the
tumult. Some hundreds of fugitives, in a half-naked state, arrived
at Fort Edward, followed by four hundred more men, under the
protection of a strong French escort. Of the personal humanity of
Montcalm there can be no doubt, but it does not appear why the
weapons of his three thousand regular troops were not ruthlessly
employed to save the Europeans from his Indian allies. His
position was a difficult one: the use of extreme force against his
native assistants would have had serious results for French
interests. The fault lay in the employment, on both sides, of the
services of those whom, in the interests of civilization, both nations
should have combined to keep down with an iron hand. Fort
William Henry was razed to the ground, and the guns and stores,
with provisions enough to feed 6000 men for six weeks, were taken
to Montreal.
The news of this disaster made the British colonists of the
north fear for the safety of New York, and the succession of
failures excited great indignation at home. A splendid fleet, and
an army of twenty thousand men in all, regulars and colonial
militia, had effected less than nothing, and Great Britain was
shown forth to the world as likely to succumb, on the North
American continent, to the superior skill and energy of her
historical European foe. The hour was, however, but the dark-
222 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
ness before dawn. A noble patriot was in power, whose mission it
was, not only to " bid Britain hurl defiance at her foes ", but to
choose the right men to do the serious work that lay before them;
to fire the whole kingdom with the ardour of his soul; to breathe
into every officer and man a portion of his own brave, lofty, and
commanding spirit; to teach commanders to risk everything in order
to win; to make his name a terror to the fops and intriguers of
Versailles; to secure complete victory for his country on the scene
of her late discredits and discomfitures. William Pitt the elder,
in a word, had resolved to annihilate the French power in America.
Their resources in Canada, during the winter of 1757-58, were at
a very low ebb. Lack of due tillage had brought scarcity of food.
Soldiers and citizens alike were on a short allowance of horse-flesh
and bread. In April, 1758, the bread ration had sunk to a daily
two ounces. Hundreds of the Acadian refugees died of sheer
hunger. France, the mother-country, was exhausted by war and
by the vilest civil administration that ever showed the way to
armed revolution. The British cruisers swept the seas, and cut off
the food-laden vessels sailing from France to Canada.
While Montcalm and De Levis were planning an advance upon
Albany, Pitt was preparing for an attack upon Louisbourg. Lord
Loudon was recalled from America, and Major-General Amherst
received the command-in-chief. He was now forty-two years of
age, and had served at Dettingen, Fontenoy, and other continental
battles, earning the confidence of his superiors by ability and
coolness. A man who had been but two years a colonel was thus
made to supersede all the generals on the army -roll. The
brigadier-generals appointed to serve under Amherst were Law-
rence, Wentworth, and Wolfe. James Wolfe, a native of Wester-
ham, near Sevenoaks, was the son of a colonel who had served
with distinction under Marlborough. His mother, Henrietta
Thompson, came of a Yorkshire family of good position. James,
the elder of two sons, entered his father's regiment of marines
before he had completed his fifteenth year. He had little school-
learning, but the constant weakness of his health never stayed his
efforts for self-improvement. He studied his profession with the
utmost care, and, in the improved drill of his light infantry, which
excited the admiration of good judges, he acknowledged his debt
to hints obtained from the reading of Xenophon's tactics against
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 22$
the Armenian mountaineers. Wolfe fought at Dettingen, at
Culloden, and again in the continental warfare, and became com-
mander of the 2Oth Regiment of the line in 1749. He soon made
his mark as an officer equally attentive to military efficiency and
to the physical and moral welfare of his men, and such young men
of rank as the Duke of Richmond and the Marquis of Blandford
sought commissions under Wolfe as their immediate chief. When
the battle of Minden was fought on August ist, 1759, Wolfe was
beyond the Atlantic, but the splendid conduct of the regiment on
that day was justly attributed to the admirable training of their
former colonel. In his appointment to a command in the American
expedition, he was receiving, as one yet only in his thirty-second
year, the opportunity of winning imperishable fame.
Pitt was resolved not to fail for lack of sufficient force. The
American colonies were requested to furnish 20,000 men, and
more than 1 2,000 regular troops were placed on board the trans-
ports, escorted by a fleet of twenty-three sail of the line, and
eighteen frigates. The ships were under the command of Admiral
Boscawen, now forty-seven years of age, who bore, from one of
the ships which he had commanded, the honourable nickname of
" Old Dreadnought ", and had done good service under Anson
and other admirals.
The fortress of Louisbourg has been already described, in
connection with the successful British siege of 1745. The works,
nearly two miles in circuit, now mounted more than 400 guns and
mortars, the fire of which was supported by five ships of the line
and seven frigates, carrying nearly 550 guns and 3000 seamen.
The garrison consisted of about 3500 men, including three
battalions of royal troops, two companies of artillery, and a
disciplined force of French Canadians. The commandant was
the Chevalier de Drucour, and the works had been lately restored
from an almost ruinous condition.
The British armament sailed from St. Helen's, on the east
coast of the Isle of Wight, towards the end of February, 1758, but,
after a brief stay at Halifax, did not appear before Louisbourg
until the first days of June. On the 8th, with some loss from the
surf and the French fire, a landing was made to the west of the
fortress, and a regular siege was soon begun. The place was
attacked on all sides by land batteries and the guns of the fleet,
224 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
though entrance to the harbour was hampered by the sinking of
five ships. The operations were distinguished by the perfect
harmony prevailing between the two services, officers and men
alike displaying the utmost zeal and patience. Every sortie was
repulsed, and on July i6th, the British troops stormed some
heights, armed with four batteries, to the west of the town. Three
of the French men-of-war were burned : the works were shattered
by bombardment. On the early morning of the 26th, two French
vessels were captured in the harbour by British boat parties, and
the fine fleet of the enemy had ceased to exist. The place had
become incapable of defence, and on July 27th the renowned
fortress of Louisbourg, and with it the island of Cape Breton,
came, by surrender, into British hands. Two years later, the
works were demolished, and the place which once threatened the
very existence of Boston and the welfare of the New England
colonies became a deserted ruin. Halifax was henceforth the naval
and military stronghold of the north-east American coast. The
trophies of the British success consisted of more than two hundred
cannon, vast quantities of stores, and eleven standards. The
captured flags were first presented to the king, and then placed
in St. Paul's Cathedral. The townspeople of Louisbourg were
conveyed to France: five thousand soldiers and sailors went to
England as prisoners of war.
The plan of campaign included attacks on the other chief
French posts, Ticonderoga, Fort Frontenac, and Fort Duquesne.
After the surrender of Louisbourg, Wolfe and other commanders
had been sent to attack the Acadian settlements at Miramichi, the
Bay of Chaleurs, Gasp6, and other points, and the ravages per-
petrated on the British frontier by the Indian allies of the enemy
and by the Canadian militia were sternly avenged in the burning
of villages, the expulsion of hundreds of French subjects from their
homes, and the destruction of vast stores of grain and fish which
might have been used for the victualling of Quebec.
In the other operations of the campaign of 1757, the French
were to obtain a last success but one against the British arms in
North America. Early in July, General Abercrombie advanced
against Ticonderoga from Albany, at the head of the largest army
which had ever been gathered in America. The force consisted
of more than six thousand troops of the line, including the 42nd
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 22$
Regiment, or Royal Highlanders, since renowned as the " Black
Watch", with nearly as many of the New England and New York
militia. Abercrombie was a stubborn and intelligent, but hardly
a skilful and circumspect commander, and he failed entirely to
understand the nature of the stronghold which he was about to
assail. Hence came his fatal mistake of marching without a due
provision of artillery. It was by means of his cannon that Mont-
calm had won the day at Oswego and at Fort William Henry,
which were far inferior in strength to the French position at
Ticonderoga, on the south-western shore of Lake Champlain,
where Montcalm himself was in command of 3500 men, nearly all
royal troops. As Abercrombie proceeded, his advance-guard,
under General Bradstreet, came upon a French party of 300 men,
most of whom were slain or captured, but the British army had to
deplore the loss of the brave young Lord Howe, who was shot
dead at the first fire. This officer, who commanded the 55th
Regiment, was of the same age and character as Wolfe, upright,
chivalrous, courteous to all ranks, devoted to duty and to the study
of the military art. His name is, to this day, remembered with
high esteem in New England, and the men of Massachusetts
honoured themselves by placing, in the south aisle of the nave of
Westminster Abbey, a memorial tablet which records their sense
"of his services and military virtues, and of the affection their
officers and soldiers bore to his command ". The death of this
young hero spread a gloom throughout the force, and was of evil
omen for what was to come.
On July 7th, the British troops arrived at Ticonderoga, and
found themselves in front of entrenchments protected by a six-gun
battery, and by a mass of felled trees placed with the branches
outward, in row after row behind each other, making an abattis of
the most formidable character. A few heavy guns would soon
have made the ground untenable by its defenders from the showers
of splinters driven inwards by the balls, and infantry could then
have made their way. Without this preparatory work, it was
mere suicide for troops to attempt to storm under a heavy con-
tinuous fire from sheltered musketeers. Montcalm had just been
joined by De Levis with 400 men, and they both awaited attack
with just confidence in their position. On the morning of July
8th, under a burning sun, the British regulars were formed into
VOL. I. IB
226 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
three columns of assault, and rushed upon their fate with a
gallantry that has never been surpassed in war. Entangled in a
labyrinth of branches, they strove, amid a shower of lead, to pull
away the trees. The active Highlanders, in many cases, succeeded
in cutting a way with their heavy claymores, or two-handed,
double-edged swords, or in clambering over the obstacles, but it
was only to die, in combats of single men against a score, on the
ramparts in the rear of the trees. Montcalm exposed his person
with the utmost daring, and the defenders lost nearly four hundred
men. The attacks, however, had never the least chance of success,
and, after a display of desperate courage for more than four hours,
the shattered columns were withdrawn, with a loss of close upon
two thousand men. The 42nd Regiment had gone into action
with nearly eleven hundred men, of whom five hundred were left
behind. This defeat, which occurred nineteen days before the
capture of Louisbourg, caused much grief in Great Britain for the
loss of brave men, but it was felt that the event could have no
serious effect upon the general issue.
The disaster was soon to be retrieved in other quarters. Brad-
street, a capable and energetic man, proposed to Abercrombie an
attack upon Fort Frontenac, on the north-east shore of Lake
Ontario, and his superior, eager for any chance of a success,
intrusted him with three thousand men for the enterprise. The
French, by a strange neglect, had left this important post with a
garrison of less than two hundred men. Bradstreet, crossing the
lake in boats from Oswego, invested the fort, and forced a sur-
render after a brief bombardment. The loss to the French was
very serious. Fort Frontenac, with seven armed vessels, was
burned. Sixty guns were taken, and the destruction of large stores
of food and ammunition greatly crippled the enemy in supplying
their chain of posts in the valley of the Ohio. The French naval
supremacy on Lake Ontario was ended, and a French writer of
the time describes the destruction of Fort Frontenac as more
hurtful to the colony of Canada than the loss of a battle. During
these events, much loss on both sides occurred in the petty warfare
of attacks on stragglers and convoys.
The border-districts of Pennsylvania and Maryland had been
devastated by the Canadians and Indians, and the attention of Pitt
was directed towards efforts for the mastery of the valley of the
CANADA— TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN.
Ohio. For this end, the main achievement would be the capture
of Fort Duquesne, the name of which had an evil sound in connec-
tion with Braddock's disastrous expedition. The enterprise was
committed to Brigadier Forbes, a man too little known in his
country's history. A native of Fifeshire, now in his sixty-fourth
year, John Forbes, after forty years' service, had become in 1750
colonel of the Scots Greys. He shared, seven years later, as
colonel of the lyth Foot, in Holbourne and Hopson's abortive
expedition against Louisbourg, and had remained on duty in the
colonies. Forbes was a man of rare gifts both as a diplomatist
and a soldier, and at this time, though he was fast sinking under a
mortal disease, he showed undiminished zeal, judgment, and resolu-
tion in the discharge of his duty.
For an advance upon Fort Duquesne, it was needful to march
two hundred miles through uninhabited territory, and to provide
stores for three months to feed six thousand men, of whom the
greater part were provincial troops, the regulars consisting mainly
of 13 companies of Highlanders. Forbes was carried in a litter
across the Alleghanies, and then, selecting a different route from
that followed by Braddock, he caused the construction of a new
road through the wilderness to a point within striking distance of
the French position. The young Colonel Washington was in
charge of a Virginian regiment, and his men assisted in making
the new road. The work was long and toilsome, and, though the
expedition had been projected in the spring, the autumn was far
advanced before the end in view was reached. One misadventure
occurred in the middle of September through the indiscretion of
Colonel Bouquet, one of Forbes' officers sent in advance. Major
Grant was detached, with about 800 men, including 300 High-
landers, to reconnoitre the fort, and endeavour to cause a sortie
which should end in a British ambuscade. The result was a con-
fused conflict, in which 1500 French and Indians cut up their enemy
with the loss of nearly 300 men, and the capture of Grant and nine
other officers. The position of the French was, however, most
precarious. The destruction of Fort Frontenac, on which De
Ligneris, the commandant at Duquesne, was dependent for his
supplies, had left the garrison almost without food, and the Indians
were transferring their allegiance to the British. In the middle of
October, Forbes, still many miles from Duquesne, was prostrate
228 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
with sickness, and had to be carried on a hurdle suspended between
two led horses. The brave and devoted Scot needed absolute rest,
and freedom from all care, in order to have a chance of recovery,
but he never faltered in his purpose of destroying the fortress
whence hostile bands had issued to devastate the British frontier,
and so cause much of the reclaimed forest to relapse into wilderness.
On November i8th, the general resolved on a rush for the
object in his view. Three columns were formed of 2500 picked
men, with Washington in command on the right, Forbes, still on
his hurdle, in the centre, and Bouquet on the left. There were
regular flanking parties, and every precaution was taken against
surprise. By the evening of the 23rd, the troops had arrived
within twelve miles of their destined prey, and the Indian scouts
reported that thick smoke was ascending in the distance. At early
morning on the 25th, the British found Fort Duquesne a blackened
ruin, abandoned in despair by the French, after blowing up most
of the works. The French had ceased to rule in the Ohio valley,
and, in honour of the great minister, the name of Duquesne was
changed to Fort Pitt, on the site of the now great and flourishing
town of Pittsburg, a centre of railway and river communication, and
the chief seat of the American iron, steel, and glass industry. The
victor, Forbes, returned in the depth of winter, reaching Philadelphia
in the middle of January, and dying on March loth, 1759, in that
chief town of the colony which he had for ever freed from all dread
of hostile inroads.
No monument was ever erected to his memory, either in Christ
Church, Philadelphia, where his remains lie buried, or in any other
place in the empire which he served. It is the more incumbent on
the historian of these events to lay a grateful wreath of honour on
a hero's grave. The new garrison of Fort Pitt visited the scene
of Braddock's disaster three years before, and beheld the whitening
bones of the dead, which now were buried in a common grave,
amid the gloom of the wintry forest-scene. The grief of the son
of Sir Peter Halket, the remains of whose father and brother, lying
close together under the leaves, were recognized through certain
relics of their dress, was the only special tribute that could be paid
to any of the victims. These two had been seen to fall side by
side on the fatal day, and were now wrapped in a Highland plaid
and laid in one tomb. The changes wrought by time are strikingly
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 229
displayed upon the stage of that tragic event. The banks of the
Monongahela are bright with gardens, orchards, corn-fields, and
villas. The victories of peace have wholly effaced the memorials
of war, and a railroad takes the cars in swift passage over the
ground where the musket and the tomahawk were most effective
in the work of slaughter.
When the year 1759 opened, it was clear that the tide of success
had turned, and that the period of French dominion in America
was drawing to a close. Canada was falling into a desperate con-
dition. Montcalm's appeals to the government at home for men,
money, and supplies were almost fruitless, in the exhausted condi-
tion of France, and the colonists were left to make a final effort in
their own defence. A levy en 'masse of all the males from sixteen
years of age to sixty produced less than fifteen thousand effective
men, who could be supported by only a few weak regiments of
royal troops. The British Parliament, on the other hand, under
the influence of Pitt, voted twelve millions of money for the support
of the struggle, and there were on American soil more than fifty
thousand well-appointed troops, of whom one-quarter were furnished
by Massachusetts and Connecticut. The colonists were resolved
to strike a blow to the heart of the enemy by the capture of Quebec,
and Pitt was equally determined to assist them. The plan of
campaign included the reduction of all the western forts, beyond
Pittsburg and towards Lake Erie, and the capture of Ticonderoga
and Crown Point.
In June, General Amherst succeeded Abercrombie in the chief
American command, and lost no time in taking the field. The
work before him was that of driving the French from Lake Cham-
plain, and thus securing the frontier of New York. On July 2Oth
he left Fort Edward, on the Hudson river, conducting a force of
nearly 12,000 men, including eight regiments of the line. No
resistance could be made to their progress, and on the 23rd it was
found that the formidable entrenchments at Ticonderoga, the scene
of Abercrombie's sanguinary repulse, had been abandoned by the
enemy, who were aware of the British strength, and of the fact that
the present force was possessed of adequate artillery. Fort Carillon,
however, was still held by the French, and it was at once assailed
by regular batteries. On the night of the 26th, the work was
abandoned by its defenders, after being mined and set on fire. The
230 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
explosion and conflagration half-destroyed the place, the garrison
escaping by their armed sloops on Lake Champlain. An immediate
advance was made to Crown Point, and that fort also was abandoned
and destroyed. This last post was restored in a stronger form, and
gave to the British a firm hold on the lake. In the course of the
autumn, armed vessels and rafts, constructed by Amherst, destroyed
some of the French craft. As winter came on, Amherst returned
to Albany, leaving strong garrisons at Ticonderoga and Crown
Point.
During the same summer, a heavy blow was dealt at French
power in the west. Their Fort Niagara, strongly defended both
by garrison and guns, commanded the passage from Lake Ontario
to Lake Erie, and was a constant menace to Oswego, which the
British designed to re-establish. The man selected for the attack
on Niagara was Brigadier Prideaux, in command of two regiments
of the line, with about 2500 New York militia, assisted by Indians
under Sir William Johnson. Prideaux marched from Schenectady,
on the Mohawk river, at the end of May, and, on arrival at Oswego,
left an officer there with a thousand men, to rebuild the fort with
timber to be cut in the neighbouring woods. An entrenchment
was made, with a barricade composed of tiers of casks filled with
flour and pork, until the new works should provide some defence.
An attack of Canadian militia and Indians was repulsed, and this
was the last blow ever struck by the French on Lake Ontario.
On July ist, Prideaux quitted Oswego, for a march of seventy
miles, along the southern coast of Lake Ontario, to Fort Niagara,
which was defended by a garrison of about 500 men, royal troops
and colonials, under Captain Pouchot, an able and experienced
officer, of the regiment of Beam. The lake-side of the work had
bastions, with guns en barbette for firing over the parapet from a
bank of earth placed in the rear; on the land-side the fort was more
strongly constructed of casks filled with earth. The place was
invested by Prideaux, and batteries were erected, the fire of which
soon proved serious for the French. On July 2oth, the British
.commander was killed by the splinter of a shell which burst on
leaving the muzzle of one of his own guns, and the siege came into
the hands of Johnson, who directed affairs with his usual vigour.
Pouchot had summoned to his aid soldiers from the Ohio forts, and
a body of 1200 men, with Indian allies, hastened to the relief of
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 231
the beleaguered fort. Johnson was on his guard, and formed a
plan for intercepting them on the march. By attacks in front and
flank, after an hour's fierce conflict, the enemy were completely
beaten, with the loss of hundreds in killed and wounded, and the
capture of nine officers, including D'Aubry, the commander. The
war-whoop of the Indians had no longer any terrors for the British
grenadiers, who stood in firm ranks, steady as on parade, and swept
away the foe with successive volleys. The Iroquois gathered by
Johnson wrought havoc among the foe scattered by the bayonet-
charges of the regular troops, and this last battle for the control of
the lakes, the Ohio valley, and the western region brought with it
the inevitable fall of Fort Niagara. On July 26th the garrison
surrendered with the honours of war, and all the western forts held
by the French were speedily captured by Colonel Bouquet, with
the single exception of Detroit.
Our narrative now turns to the key of French power in North
America, the town and fortress of Quebec. Montcalm, in the
absence of substantial aid from France, had no hope of maintaining
the French position in Canada, but at his sovereign's request he
consented to remain and to do his utmost against enormous odds.
All possible preparations were made for the defence of the capital.
The town of Quebec is so placed on a peninsula in the river St.
Lawrence that it directly faces the voyager who ascends the
stream. The river is divided, on approaching the town, by the
large He d'Orleans, lying almost in the centre of the waterway.
To the north of the town, the river St. Charles, with a winding
course, and with one great loop, enters the St. Lawrence. To
the south of Quebec, the mainland projects, west of Point Levis, so
as to approach the town, on its eastern side, within less than a
mile. On the northern shore, the Beauport Shoal, left dry at low
water, extends for about eight miles, from the mouth of the
St. Charles to the little river Montmorency, ending its course with
the famous Falls, nearly three hundred feet in depth. The whole
of this ground on the north was occupied by the French troops,
with intrenchrnents and batteries facing the river to the south,
near to Quebec, and looking landwards lower down to the east,
where the river-side, above Beauport Shoal, is protected by lofty
and precipitous cliffs. De Vaudreuil, the governor, had charge of
the encampment on the west, near to the St. Charles; Montcalm
232 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
was in the centre, at the little village of Beauport; De Levis held
the east, facing the western end of He d'Orleans, and protected,
on his left, by the river Montmorency. Fire-ships and rafts were
prepared by the French, with a floating battery for heavy guns, as
guns were then, from eighteen-pounders to twenty-four. The
garrison consisted of thirteen thousand men of every age, by no
means all efficient troops, but including five royal regiments. The
few French ships of war were sent up the river, the crews being
landed to aid the defence, chiefly in the way of working the guns.
The preparations made by Pitt for the great enterprise were of
the most formidable kind. The chief command of the military
force was intrusted, as all the world knows, to Wolfe, who had
returned to England, and, by the usage of the time, was again a
simple regimental colonel. His health was bad, and it was at
Bath, where he was drinking the waters, that the hero, doomed to
death and to lasting fame, received the great minister's letter
which summoned him to London with the offer of the command,
and the local rank of major-general, subordinate to Amherst as
commander-in-chief of the forces in America. The young officer
had just become engaged for marriage with Katharine Lowther,
niece of Sir James Lowther, first Lord Lonsdale. The death of
her accepted lover was to leave her to attain the highest rank
as Duchess of Bolton. The officers chosen by Wolfe as his
brigadiers were the Hon. Robert Monckton, the Hon. George
Townshend, and the Hon. James Murray. Monckton had served
for some years in America, having taken Fort Beausejour, in
Nova Scotia, and been present as colonel of the second battalion
of the 6oth Regiment, or Royal Americans, afterwards the Royal
Rifle Corps, at the siege of Louisbourg. He was a man of great
ability, and gave a hearty support to his chief throughout the
campaign. Townshend, afterwards Marquis, was a man of mainly
social note, and rendered little service in the siege of Quebec.
Murray enjoyed the highest esteem of Wolfe for bravery and skill,
and had served with Monckton at the taking of Louisbourg. He
was soon to become the first governor-general of Canada.
The army consisted of about eight thousand men, including the
1 5th Regiment, which fought in Marlborough's four battles; the
28th, which had been present on the glorious day of Ramillies;
the 35th, the 47th, and the 48th, all bearing "Louisbourg" on
. . i H briL :
flfi Z\
"10 li
I
i hnu
.
• '_ adJ ni
^
•
VIEW OF THE TOWN AND FORTRESS OF QUEBEC,
A.D. 1759.
In this illustration there is an accurate presentment of the town and
fortress of Quebec in the year 1759, when France and Britain were
struggling for supremacy in North America. A bold, rocky peninsula juts
out into the river St. Lawrence, on the shore of which lies the town, while
the massive citadel crowns the height. Some distance above Quebec is an
inlet known as Wolfe's Cove, where a British force, under the general of
that name, landed during the early morning, scaled the cliffs, and defeated
the French army which sought to oppose its advance upon the fortress.
As the result of this success the garrison of Quebec found itself in a help-
less position, and surrendered on the i8th September, 1759. In this fashion,
therefore, the Gibraltar of North America came into the possession of Great
Britain.
(7)
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN.
233
their colours; the 43rd, whose first title to fame was about to be
won; the second and third battalions of the 6oth Regiment, and
the ySth, or Simon Eraser's Highlanders. To these were added
some companies of the Louisbourg Grenadiers, some hundreds of
" Rangers ", over three hundred of the Royal Artillery, and a body
of engineers. The fleet was of overwhelming strength, numbering
22 ships of the line of battle, and as many more frigates and
smaller ships of war. The right man was selected for command in
QUEBEC
AND ITS NEIGHBOURHOOD
to illustrate tt.e Operations of
one who has been, to a large extent, unjustly treated in the scant
remembrance of posterity. It is owing to the number of great
reputations won in later years by British seamen that Admiral
Saunders has been well-nigh forgotten. His whole life was spent
on active service; on every occasion he showed eminent ability;
and of his work at Quebec no higher eulogy can be pronounced
than that he proved himself in all ways a worthy colleague of
Wolfe. Throughout the operations his professional skill, his
regard for duty, his loyal and hearty aid to the military chief, were
never found wanting in the hour of trial. A subordinate of
Anson's, as lieutenant of the Centurion, when he started on the
four-years' voyage round the world, Saunders ended his career as
Admiral of the Fleet, and lies, fitly enough, in Westminster Abbey,
234 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
near to the monument of General Wolfe. Among the officers on
board the fleet were John Jervis, who became Earl St. Vincent,
and James Cook, known in the southern seas. A squadron under
Admiral Durell was sent on ahead to secure the mouth of the
St. Lawrence, and to intercept possible French supplies, and
Saunders, with the prevision of a man who would succeed by
avoiding the disgraceful blunders of previous expeditions, wrote to
the governor of New York for a supply of pilots knowing every
current, shoal, and rock in the river which the fleet was to ascend.
The advance-fleet arrived at Halifax in the last days of April,
1759, and was, even then, delayed by the yet unmelted ice. The
arrival of Durell in the St. Lawrence early in June prevented the
French from obstructing approach to Quebec by the construction
of batteries on the islands below the He d'Orleans, but he was only
in time to capture two vessels of the transport-fleet from France.
His presence, as the forerunner of a larger force, caused much
alarm at Quebec, while the British seamen were engaged in
sounding and surveying, as a preparation for the coming of
Saunders with the main body of the armament. The coast of
Newfoundland, with the snow still lying upon the hills, was
sighted on June 2nd, and the 23rd saw the vessels at the He aux
Coudres, thirty-six miles below the He d'Orleans. Signal-fires
from height to height carried the tidings to Quebec, as the ships
slowly and carefully made their way upwards, in the rear of boats
sounding ahead, and marking out the channel with coloured flags.
On June 27th a landing was made on lie d'Orleans, twenty miles
in length and six in its greatest breadth; it was found to be
wholly deserted by the people.
On the night of the 28th, the enemy made their first attempt
against the British in sending down seven fire-ships for the destruc-
tion of three frigates lying in advance, and of sixty transports off
the island. The total failure of this movement excited from the
British sailors shouts of laughter and cheers which were heard at
Quebec. The boats of the frigates towed away one to the shore
seven miles below. Two caught fire as they left Quebec, one
exploded when the match was lighted, three only made their way
to the island, where they went ashore and did no harm. The
admiral, Saunders, warned by some damage from a violent storm,
anchored his ships in the basin of Quebec, to the north of Point
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 235
Levis, and, by his advice, Wolfe caused Monckton to occupy with
three regiments the southern shore near the Point, facing the
town. Batteries were erected there, and on the western front of
the He d'Orleans, and a firm hold was thus taken on the southern
side of the St. Lawrence.
The British general had issued a proclamation assuring
civilians of protection for property and person, with freedom of
religion, provided they took no part in the war. The people,
however, were induced by their priests to resist in every way those
who came, it was declared, as foes of their religion and their race,
and the savage warfare usual in the contests of the past was seen
in full play. Stragglers were cut off, the wounded were murdered,
the dead were mutilated, and Wolfe, after vain remonstrance, was
driven to retaliate by burning the villages above and below
Quebec. His attention was soon drawn to the French position
on the north shore, and on July 8th a landing was effected by
Townshend's brigade to the east of the Montmorency. Four
days later, the French wholly failed in a night-attack by boats on
the British at Point Levis. The defenders were warned by some
premature shots, and a panic and flight were caused by the mere
alarm of " cavalry ".
On July 1 2th the batteries at Point Levis opened fire on
Quebec, and the bombardment thence and from the guns of the
fleet, maintained at intervals for the next two months, laid most of
both upper and lower towns in ruins. The cathedral and chief
buildings were shattered; churches, convents, and hundreds of the
best houses were destroyed by incendiary bombs. This, however,
was not the capture of Quebec. The citadel, on its towering
rock, with massive ramparts that bristled with guns, rose frowning
in unconquerable strength, beyond the reach of shot or shell from
the heaviest cannon known in that age. Amidst the daily roar of
the cannon aimed at the town, Wolfe had been striving to deal
with the foe encamped on the northern shore. After losses had
been incurred, from Indian parties lying in the woods, by troops
sent out to discover places to ford the Montmorency, an attack
was made on the French lines to the west of that river, where
De Levis was in command. On the evening of July 3ist, after
some hours' bombardment of the French redoubt on the shore
near the Montmorency Falls, from the Centurion frigate, and
236 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
a hot cannonade on the French lines from the British batteries
east of that river, thirteen companies of grenadiers, with 200
of the 6oth Regiment, were landed at the foot of the cliff on
the west of the falls. The movement was to be supported by
Monckton's brigade, coming on in another flotilla of boats, and by
Townshend's force, crossing the ford below the falls, which was
passable at low tide. The grenadiers took the redoubt at a rush,
and should there have remained to await the arrival of their
comrades. Either from the rash impulse caused by a first success,
or by a mistaken order, the troops went forward to ascend the
heights crowned by the French intrenchments and batteries. The
enemy were mustered there in great force, with three thousand
men for immediate defence, and double the number reserved in
the rear. No courage could stand against the crushing fire
coming from above, and the men slipped down the banks of clay
on the side of the hill. A violent storm burst on those who
regained the redoubt; their ammunition was ruined; all unity of
action with the other troops had been spoiled by a hasty move-
ment, and Wolfe, who was in command at this point, could do
nothing but cover, with his steady reserves, the re-embarkation of
the defeated grenadiers. Nearly five hundred officers and men
had fallen in this disastrous affair. The spirit of the garrison and
townsmen of Quebec was not much elated by this success, which
followed close upon the tidings of the loss of Ticonderoga and
Crown Point, and was succeeded, in a few days, by news of the
surrender of Fort Niagara.
The advancing season caused anxiety to Wolfe, since the lapse
of a few weeks must cause the retirement of the fleet, on pain of
being blockaded by the ice. There was much sickness among the
troops, and, in spite of raids upon the colonial cattle, rations of
beef were becoming a luxury. It is remarkable that no aid was
furnished to the enterprise from the large and well-supplied armies
of Amherst at Crown Point and of Johnson at Niagara. The
military work and the soldier's fame, to be done and acquired
before Quebec, were, on the British side, to be Wolfe's alone. His
attention was turned, after the failure near the Montmorency Falls,
to the employment of his men against the enemy above Quebec.
Wolfe's object, in the first instance, seems to have been that of
not suffering the spirit of the troops to sink through inactivity,
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 237
rather than the attainment of any decisive issue. The French
ships lay above the town, near the Richelieu rapids, and Admiral
Holmes was sent up to make an attack on them. The matter
ended, however, in the landing of a large body of men, under
Brigadier Murray, at Saint Antoine on the south bank of the St.
Lawrence, and the devastation of the adjacent country.
Towards the end of August, anxiety and toil, with the season's
heat, had thrown Wolfe into a fever, and he called his three
brigadiers into council. He had resolved that the end of Sep-
tember was the furthest possible limit of time for operations
involving the stay of the fleet, and early action was absolutely
needed if success was to be obtained in the present year. The
decision reached was for a landing in force above the town, in the
hope of drawing Montcalm, hitherto strictly defensive in his tactics
with the main force, to a battle involving the fate of Quebec. On
September 3rd, the British camp east of the Montmorency was
abandoned, and the whole of the troops were gathered at He
d'Orleans and Point LeVis. The British fleet was then kept
moving about, accompanied by many boats with troops, up and
down the river above Quebec, distracting the French commanders
with doubts as to the point to be chosen for a landing. The guns
from Point Levis were still kept thundering across at the town,
and a large French force on the northern shore was harassed by
the need of following the movements of the hostile craft. By
September 6th, the bulk of the army and many of the fleet were
above Quebec, and Wolfe had selected his place of attack.
At this critical time, the army had just been greatly depressed
by the tidings that their general was again confined to his quarters
by illness. His heroic spirit lorded it over the weakness of his
bodily frame, and, with his future at stake, and with probable
failure as certain ruin to a promising career, he rose from his bed
to complete the arrangements for the work in hand. On the i2th
of September, the men were employed in cleaning their arms, and
each soldier received two days' rations, with an extra allowance of
rum and water for the prospective work by night. At early
morning on the I3th, under a moonless sky, the ships, with troops
on board, dropped down the river on the ebbing tide, with thirty
barges containing sixteen hundred men. The oars were muffled,
and not a man spake a word, as the large boats crept along the
238 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
northern shore. Wolfe had issued his last order of the day, calling
on " a determined body of soldiers, inured to war " to do all that
their country expected "against five weak French battalions,
mingled with disorderly peasantry". On the evening of the i2th,
a demonstration in force had been made to the east of Quebec, off
the Beauport shoals. The ships of the line came as near to the
shore as safety allowed, and boats full of soldiers, sailors, and
marines quitted their sides as if for a landing. When darkness
came on, the remaining detachments at He d'Orleans and Point
Levis were taken on board the ships to the rendezvous up the
river. The general, with a presentiment of his coming end, had
sent for his old schoolfellow, John Jervis, then commanding a
vessel of the fleet. To him was handed Miss Lowther's portrait,
a miniature painting, for transmission to her in case of need. The
will of Wolfe had been prepared, leaving his plate to his staunch
naval colleague, Saunders, and his camp-equipage to loyal Brigadier
Monckton. The books and papers were committed to Colonel
Guy Carleton, known in Canadian history as Lord Dorchester.
About three miles above Quebec, at an inlet since known as
Wolfe's Cove, a path led up a precipitous height, with bushes
scattered to right and left. The French had not dreamed that an
army could ascend at such a place, and the top of the cliff, where
a climber would come on the ground above the town called The
Plains of Abraham, was guarded only by an outpost of one
hundred men. The first to mount were the Highlanders, and
their leader, Captain M' Donald, gave the correct countersign, " La
France ", learned from a deserter, to the sentry's challenge. The
scanty guard was thus surprised and overpowered, and the rest of
the troops made the ascent. A single field-piece, with its ammuni-
tion, was by great exertion dragged up the cliff. WTith the rising
of the sun, about 3700 British troops were ranked in order, with
their right towards the town, under Monckton's command. Murray
had the centre, and Townshend the left, with Wolfe observing the
whole position. The French army in the Beauport lines, below
the town, had been kept on the alert throughout the night, in
weary expectation of attempts to land. Montcalm had remained
there until one o'clock on the morning of the 1 3th, the fatal day,
and it was between six and seven that, at De Vaudreuil's quarters,
nearer to the town, he heard the astounding news from the coming
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 239
scene of conflict. The bulk of his force, in a hurried march of six
miles, was brought by the bridge across the St. Charles, and about
nine o'clock his army, consisting of about seven thousand men, half
of them worthless against good troops, was in some sort of order
facing the British. A thousand Indians and Canadians were on
the flanks, who, with the skirmishers in front, delivered a some-
what galling fire. The one British cannon was beautifully served
against two French guns, and the musketry fire was steadily
returned. Nothing but immediate success could save Montcalm,
for the British, each minute, were growing stronger. Their
seamen were dragging guns and ammunition up the cliff, and many
more troops could be landed from the ships. The French
commander led a gallant attack on the centre and right of his
foe, but his men became disordered from lack of discipline or want
of room, and the British advanced with steady pace, reserving
their fire, by Wolfe's special orders, until they arrived within forty
yards. Two volleys, aimed from low-levelled muskets firmly held,
tore to pieces the line of the foe, and a rush with the bayonet soon
decided the day. At this moment, Wolfe, as he led the Louis-
bourg grenadiers, with a handkerchief tied round a wrist that was
wounded at the opening of the fight, was struck by a musket-ball
in the breast. Staggering into an officer's arms, he begged him
to hide the fact from the men, and was carried to a captured
redoubt in the rear, where he heard the cry "They run! they
run!" and learned that victory had been gained by his men.
Giving orders for retreat to be cut off from the bridge over the
river St. Charles, the conqueror of Canada turned on his side, and
in a few minutes uttered his final words, "God be praised! I die
in peace". He left his countrymen to mourn his death before he
had completed his thirty-third year.
The brief contest dealt hardly with other leaders than Wolfe.
The aide-de-camp who carried the tidings of the general's fall to
Monckton, found the brigadier himself laid low by a shot through
the right of the breast. Montcalm received a mortal bullet-wound
in the abdomen; his second in command was struck down, and
taken prisoner, only to die on board ship; the next officer in rank
was also slain. The whole battle did not last half-an-hour, costing
the victors about 60 killed, and ten times the number wounded.
The French, of whom 250, including 16 officers, became prisoners
240 OUR EMPIRE AT .HOME AND ABROAD.
on the field, suffered a loss of about 1200 in slain or disabled
men. The enemy, pursued to the walls of the town, had many
killed on the glacis and in the ditch, the Highlanders, with their
broadswords, being specially effective. The British troops, now
under the command of Townshend, then proceeded to intrench
themselves on the ground which had been won, while the path
up the cliff was widened and made more practicable, and tents,
cannon, ammunition, and food were brought up from the ships.
The French general, carried into Quebec, expired early in the
morning after the battle.
There was one personage engaged on the French side at
Quebec to whom some notice is due. The troops nominally under
the command of the governor, De Vaudreuil, were practically in
charge of M. de Bougainville, who had come out to Canada in
1756 as chief aide to Montcalm, and had, after return to France,
arrived with the reinforcements in May, 1759. It was he who
had been detached, with 1500 men, to watch the movements of the
ships and boats above Quebec, and to follow them in their per-
plexing shifts of position prior to the men's ascent to the field
of battle. He was approaching the Plains of Abraham when he
heard that all was lost, and the advance of the victors compelled
him to retreat. This man of distinction, both in science and in
practical life, entered the naval service of France in 1763, and from
1766 to 1769 was engaged in the first French circumnavigation of
the globe. He served as admiral in the French war prior to the
Revolution, and, on the outbreak of that political convulsion, he
retired into private life as one devoted to scientific pursuits.
Napoleon I. created him a senator and a member of the Legion
of Honour, and he died in 181 1.
Great preparations were being made for the siege of the town
from the western side, and more than a hundred guns and mortars
were soon in position. Their services, however, were not required.
De Vaudreuil had already abandoned the lines at Beauport, and
written to De Levis, who was now at Montreal, with a summons
to assume command of the troops at Quebec. The commandant,
de Ramezay, son of a former governor of Montreal, knew that
nothing but capitulation could be thought of. The town was
almost destitute of provisions; the troops were utterly disheartened.
A council of fourteen officers, meeting on September I5th, voted,
GENERAL WOLFE IS MORTALLY WOUNDED AS HE LEADS
THE CHARGE ON THE PLAINS OF ABRAHAM.
At early morning on the i3th September, 1759, under a moonless sky,
and with every precaution taken against detection, General Wolfe silently
landed his forces above Quebec. Then the Highlanders led the way up
the Heights of Abraham, and the French picket on the Plains above was
promptly captured. The French army, however, hurried up to oppose the
British advance, and when the sun rose the battle began. The Frenchmen
charged, but were met with two musket volleys at close quarters. Then
the gallant Wolfe called upon his men to give them the bayonet, and him-
self led the charge of the Louisbourgh Grenadiers. Alas! just at that
moment he was struck by a musket-ball; and when, a few minutes after-
wards, he heard that the enemy were running, he exclaimed: "God be
praised ! I die in peace."
W. H. OVEREND.
GENERAL WOLFE IS MORTALLY WOUNDED AS HE LEADS
THE CHARGE ON THE PLAINS OF ABRAHAM.
Vol. i. p. 239.
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 241
with one exception, for surrender, and the white flag was hoisted
two days later. The honours of war were granted to the troops,
who were to be landed in France : the persons and property of the
inhabitants, and the exercise of religion, were to be unmolested.
On the evening of September i8th, 1759, the Louisbourg grena-
diers and some light infantry took charge of the gates, and the
city and fortress of Quebec, the Gibraltar of North America,
passed into the possession of Great Britain. The hungry towns-
folk were amply fed from the stores of their conquerors. Brigadier
Murray became acting-governor, and Admiral Safinders, after his
excellent service throughout the operations which had obtained so
glorious an issue of war, sailed with his fleet, save two frigates, for
home. The troops in the French lines at Beauport had retreated,
under De Vaudreuil, to Jacques Cartier, where they were met by
De Levis, who, unaware of the real state of affairs, vainly urged
the governor to advance and endeavour to rescue the town. De
Levis went forward within 13 miles of Quebec, and then retired
to Jacques Cartier and intrenched his forces. De Bougainville
was posted at Point aux Trembles, above Quebec, and De
Vaudreuil took charge of affairs at Montreal.
The news of success was received in Great Britain with a joy
much tempered by sorrow for the price paid in the death of the
good, chivalrous, devoted, and very able commander, who forfeited
his life, in his country's cause, in the moment of a brilliant success
attained by a stroke of daring that combined genius of a high order
with a moral courage and decision of character worthy of the
greatest man in history. Wolfe's name lives for ever in the
memory of his countrymen, the poorest of whom wore a scrap of
mourning for the man whose victory came with startling effect
upon the public mind which the previous events of the siege had
prepared for a failure. The young hero's body was laid by his
father's side in the vaults of Greenwich church. It was by a
unanimous vote of the House of Commons that the memorial was
placed in Westminster Abbey. The declaration of Pitt that Wolfe,
" with a handful of men, had added an empire to English rule",
was a semi-prophetic utterance to which events were to furnish a
speedy fulfilment. Nor must a tribute be lacking to the memory of
the gallant and noble-minded Montcalm, a man skilled in war, and
a patriot of incorruptible spirit at a time when the civil servants of
VOL. I. 16
242 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
the French crown were preying upon the resources of the colony
with the utmost baseness and greed. His remains were buried in
the garden of the Ursuline Convent at Quebec, where the enemy
had already prepared his grave in an excavation made by the burst-
ing of a shell from one of the British batteries at Point Levis. His
skull is preserved in the chaplain's parlour at the Convent. The
spot where Wolfe died in the redoubt was marked by a monument
in 1835, erected by the governor-general, Lord Aylmer. This
memorial was, in course of time, destroyed by tourists who chipped
off pieces to carry away. In 1849 its remains were replaced by a
column erected at the cost of the officers of the army in Canada,
bearing the former inscription Here died Wolfe victorious. Turning
to Montcalm, we find that Lord Aylmer, also in 1835, placed a
slab to his memory in the Ursuline Convent, with the words: —
" Honneur a Montcalm: \ le destin en lui dtrobant \ la Victoire \
L'a recompense" par Une Mort Glorieuse. With a most appro-
priate conjunction of two great names, a public subscription in the
province of Quebec caused the erection, in 1827, of an obelisk, in
the public garden overlooking the river, to the memory of both
gallant men who, by an event very rare in the history of war,
perished in the same battle as leaders of contending armies. The
pillar, sixty-five feet in height, bears the inscription: Wolfe . . .
Montcalm. Mortem Virtus Communem Famam Historia \
Monumentum Posteritas \ Dedit. \ , which, in almost literal transla-
tion, means, Valour gave union in death: Fame History awards:
A monument posterity (Here gratefully] accords.
The death of Montcalm gave De Levis the chief position in
Canada, and he displayed much ability and energy in meeting the
difficulties of what the capture of Quebec had rendered a desperate
condition of affairs. The Indian allies of France began to waver
in their friendship and support. There was severe distress alike
among the French troops and civilians from lack of supplies of food.
Nor were the conquerors of Quebec without their troubles. The
winter of 1759-60 was intensely cold, and it was needful to procure
food and fuel by foraging conducted to a distance of many miles
from the town. The garrison of seven thousand men, under
General Murray, lost nearly half its effective strength by death, by
disease, and by cold which disabled the hands and feet.
Meanwhile, the brave French commander was planning no
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 243
smaller an enterprise than the recapture of Quebec. Troops and
supplies were gathered at Montreal, and when the middle of April,
1 760, saw the navigation opened, a force of 7000 men, including
3000 Canadian militia, was ready to take the field. Vessels loaded
with stores, artillery, and ammunition, and escorted by two frigates,
started down the St. Lawrence, and the soldiers under De Levis
made their way partly by land. Special prayers had been offered
at the Cathedral, and both the national and the religious feelings of
the soldiers had been diligently stirred against the successful heretics
who held the hateful doctrines of Luther and Calvin. A French
force of one thousand men was repulsed near Point Le"vis early in
March, and Murray took measures to fortify the Plains of Abraham,
when he heard of the extensive preparations of the foe. In the last
week of April, Murray was daily expecting the arrival of his anta-
gonist, and on the 27th he retired from Saint Foy within the walls
of the town, in presence of a great and increasing hostile force.
Prudence would have dictated a defence of the works, an attack
upon which would have certainly ended in severe disaster for the
French assailants. Murray, however, as the successor in command
of the victorious Wolfe, and justly relying on the courage of his
men, heeded too little his inferiority of numbers. On the early
morning of April 28th he marched out with but three thousand
men, massed in two columns, with a few field-guns, to attack De
Levis. A desperate fight of nearly two hours' duration ended in
the retreat of the British, outflanked and overcome by superior
forces. They were not pursued by the foe, but left six cannon
behind them, with nearly three hundred men killed, and about
thrice that number disabled. The victorious French, ten thousand
strong, lost about one-fifth of their numbers.
De Levis then entrenched his men before the ramparts of
Quebec, and began a kind of siege, vigorously met by Murray with
the fire of more than a hundred heavy guns. A letter was dis-
patched to Amherst at Halifax, detailing the position of affairs.
Both parties were eagerly looking for help in the shape of a naval
squadron, when on May gth, a vessel of war appeared rounding
Point LeVis. Loud cheers from the British hailed the running-up
of the glorious Union Jack to the peak of the Lowestoft frigate,
freshly come from England. A few days later, the arrival of
Admiral Lord Colville's fleet caused the hasty retreat of De Levis,
244 °UR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
with the abandonment of his siege-train and baggage. The two
French frigates lying off the town were pursued up the river, run
aground, and taken. The Lowestoft was lost, ten leagues above
Quebec, on some uncharted rocks in the middle of the St. Law-
rence. The retirement of the French leader to Montreal with a
dispirited and fast melting army left Quebec finally, without further
menace, in British hands, and was the sign of the swiftly-approach-
ing close of all French dominion in North America.
During the winter and early spring, Amherst, the commander-
in-chief, had followed the instructions of Pitt in preparing for the
complete effacement of French power. Three different British
armies converged upon Montreal. Colonel Haviland, with three
thousand men, went from Crown Point, by Lake Champlain and
the river Richelieu, ousting the enemy from He aux Noix, and then
marching to the south side of the St. Lawrence, facing the town.
Murray ascended the river from Quebec. Amherst, with ten thou-
sand men, and a body of Indians under Sir William Johnson,
proceeded from Albany, on the Hudson, by way of the Mohawk
and Oswego rivers, and Lake Ontario, for a descent of the St.
Lawrence upon the last stronghold of French rule. Amherst
started on August loth, 1760, and on the 25th captured the strong
French fort near La Presentation (afterwards, Ogdensburg), below
the Thousand Islands on the St. Lawrence, after a brisk defence,
ending in the surrender of Pouchot, the brave holder of Fort
Niagara in the previous year. After the loss of some dozens of
boats and men in the Cedars and Cascade rapids, with many guns
and stores, on September 4th, the general, two days later, landed
his men at Lachine, eight miles above Montreal. Murray, leaving
Quebec on July i4th with over two thousand picked men, and
escorted up the St. Lawrence by gun-boats and frigates, arrived
on August 24th at Contrecceur, eighteen miles below Montreal.
Haviland, quitting Crown Point on August i6th, took He aux Noix
by surrender on the 28th, and early in September was on the south
shore of the great river, within four hours' march of the object of
all the movements of the troops.
The position of the French was hopeless. On September 8th
sixteen thousand men were on or close to the island of Montreal,
menacing a weak place defended by little more than two thousand
disheartened troops. In spite of objections made by De Levis, the
CANADA — TILL CESSION TO BRITAIN. 245
Marquis de Vaudreuil, Governor of Canada, at once surrendered,
with the honours of war, to overwhelming force, and signed articles
of capitulation which provided that all the regular French troops
in Canada, four thousand men, should become prisoners of war for
conveyance to France, not to serve again during the struggle; that
the militia should disperse to their homes ; that the exercise of reli-
gion should be free; and that the Canadians should become subjects
of the British crown. A census taken by Amherst found the
population of the colony just exceeding 76,000. A month later,
on October 25th, 1760, George the Third came to the throne.
Amherst soon returned to New York, after making due arrange-
ments for the government of the new province. For nearly four
years, until October, 1764, a system of rule prevailed which has
become known as le regne militaire, a designation which tends to
disguise the fact that the government was conducted entirely in
accordance with the old French laws and customs of the colony,
and with the earnest desire to promote the welfare and contentment
of the conquered people. Justice was administered by military
officers, but the courts had nothing military about them save the
name. The French captains of militia, retaining authority in their
own parishes, decided civil questions, with an appeal to the British
commander of the district, and, further, to the governor with a
council of captains. Criminal matters were decided by military
law. The governor was assisted in his administration of affairs
by a council of field-officers. General Gage became governor of
Montreal and district; Brigadier Burton at Three Rivers; and
Murray continued in authority at Quebec.
Apart from the differences of nationality, language, and religious
faith, and from the natural feeling as regards rulers imposed by
force of arms, the Canadians had the strongest reasons for satis-
faction with the change of masters. A despotic mediaeval form of
governmeat was superseded by a free modern system which pro-
vided the blessings of local self-government, Habeas Corpus, and
trial by jury, to be followed, in due season, by education and free-
dom of the press in place of gross ignorance and harsh repression;
by freedom of trade replacing monopoly ; by the restriction of feudal
power in the seigneur over the serf. A host of extortionate officials
was deported to France along with the conquered troops, and the ces-
sation of international warfare ended, with one brief exception, the
246 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
frontier- feuds, and the Indian massacres and devastations, which
had for so long a period brought terror and ruin to the tillers of
the soil. In May, 1763, Governor Gage was able to announce
the cession of Canada to Great Britain by the Treaty of Paris,
and, a few months later, he replaced Amherst at New York, being
succeeded at Montreal by Burton, whom Haldimand replaced at
Three Rivers.
CHAPTER VII.
CANADA UNDER BRITISH RULE (1763-1801).
War with the Indians — Pontiac the Ottawa chief— Major Gladwin's gallant defence
of Fort Detroit — Indian cunning and cruelty — British forts captured — Colonel
Bouquet's expedition to relieve Fort Pitt — Sir William Johnson's negotiations with
the Indians — Submission of Pontiac and the tribes — The French Canadians under
the new rule — General Murray becomes governor — Able administration of his
successor, Sir Guy Carleton, Lord Dorchester — Quebec Act of 1774 — The country
threatened by the revolted American colonists — Surrender of St. John's — Quebec
besieged by the Americans — Loyalty of the Canadians — Province of Ontario
created and colonized — Constitutional Act of 1791 — Upper and Lower Canada
formed — Their constitution defined — Slavery prohibited — Characteristics of the
French Canadian.
The change of masters in Canada brought with it one last
great Indian war, arising from the attachment of native tribes to
the French who were compelled to acknowledge the supremacy
of Great Britain. The traders and missionaries of the defeated
European power had, as we have seen, been successful in winning
the adhesion of most of the Indian tribes, and many of the savages
were resolved that, if their old friends were to go, no other Euro-
peans should rule in their stead. The land must be cleared of
"those dogs dressed in red", and a leader was found in Pontiac,
a bold and skilful chieftain of the Ottawas. When Major Rogers,
with two hundred of his " Rangers", went from Montreal, after the
capitulation, to receive the submission of the French commanders at
the western forts, the Indian potentate gave him a haughty recep-
tion, and insisted on being treated with due deference as a condition
of allowing the troops to remain in his country. This remarkable
man has been represented as the chief organizer of a wide-spread
conspiracy for the extermination of the British conquerors, but
he was rather an instrument in the hands of the French traders on
CANADA UNDER BRITISH RULE. 247
the Mississippi who were eager to divert the fur-trade of the
lakes to the great western river, and to make New Orleans the
outlet for the profitable traffic which they sought to keep in
French hands. For this end, it was needful to destroy the
garrisons at the forts which protected the trade on the great lakes,
and so to deter British enterprise from using Canada and the
adjacent colonies to the south as starting-points of a commercial
rivalry in furs.
At this time, Montreal was almost the western limit of
European settlement. No French Canadian was to be found in
what is now the province of Ontario. Six hundred miles of
navigation up the St. Lawrence and through Lakes Ontario and
Erie was needful to reach the settlement at Detroit, where a
few hundreds of people were, for five months of the year, cut off
from all communications with civilization except by means of
snow-shoes. Chains of military posts connected Canada and the
State of New York with the west. Fort William Augustus was at
the head of the rapids on the St. Lawrence; Oswego, as we have
seen, lay on the southern shore of Lake Ontario. Fort Niagara,
with two smaller posts, maintained the connection between lakes
Ontario and Erie. Fort Pitt, formerly Duquesne, lying at the
junction of the Alleghany and Monongahela rivers which form the
Ohio, was connected with the north by Forts Presqu'ile, on the
southern shore of Lake Erie, Le Bceuf, and Venango (or Mac-
hault). Fort Miami lay near the south-west corner of Lake Erie,
and other posts lay on the river Wabash. Fort Detroit, on the
river joining Lake Saint Claire to Lake Erie, was a strong post
connected with the scattered settlement mentioned above. Out-
lying posts were found on or near Lake Michigan. The French,
in 1763, still held Fort Vincennes, on the Wabash, and Fort
Chartres, on the Mississippi. These posts, of which Fort
Chartres was a strong stone work, mounting twenty cannon and
capable of holding a garrison of three hundred men, were the
head-quarters of the conspiracy which roused the Indians to
hostility against the British.
The only man on the side of the conquerors of Canada who
had ever succeeded, as we have seen, in conciliating the Indians
was Sir William Johnson. In 1761, he conferred at Detroit with
the chiefs of the Ottawa confederacy, and had some success in
248 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
winning their goodwill. The natives in other quarters missed the
courteous treatment and the welcome presents which they had
been wont to receive from the French. The cold and haughty
British commandants treated the chiefs and their tribes as of small
account, and withheld the military honours, the flattering words,
the showy bribes of medals and orders, and the lavish hospitality
with which the French had welcomed Indian leaders who visited
their forts. The traders on the Mississippi, aided by the persua-
sive tongues of the missionaries, spread reports that the British, in
the occupation of the old military posts and the erection of new
ones, were intent on the extirpation of the natives. The
slanderous fable won a wide belief, and its effect was seen in
a great confederacy which included the Senecas, Miamis, Wyan-
dots, Shawnees, Delawares, and other tribes spread over the
country from Niagara and the Alleghanies to Lake Superior and
the Mississippi. Sir William Johnson sent warnings both to the
Lords of Trade at home, and to the authorities at Albany and New
York, but his words were treated with the ignorant neglect which,
in British affairs, has too often been the precursor of disastrous
events. The Indians were also encouraged to rise against the
British by an absurd fiction, uttered with the utmost confidence by
their French friends, that an army and fleet would soon arrive in
the St. Lawrence and recover Canada from the hands of her new
possessors.
The plot was being matured for two years before its outbreak
into action on May Qth, 1763. Major Gladwin, the brave, able,
and prudent commander at Fort Detroit, had discerned the coming
danger, and had dispatched warnings to his comrades at Forts
Pitt, Presqu'ile, and elsewhere. Gladwin, as a lieutenant in the
48th Regiment, had been wounded in Braddock's defeat of 1755;
he was present at the capitulation of Montreal five years later, and
he was now to win fame by a gallant defence during the longest
siege in the annals of Indian warfare against European foes. On
May ist, Pontiac, who is described as prone to take offence, and
as a man of vindictive character, presented himself at Fort
Detroit, with forty of his fellow Ottawas, and proposed that he and
other chiefs should perform their dance as a token of peace and
friendship. They were admitted for this purpose, and then took
their leave. Gladwin had received a friendly warning of what was
CANADA UNDER BRITISH RULE. 249
to come, and was quite prepared for Pontiac's arrival a few days
later. The chief, with fifty warriors, paid another visit, each man
carrying beneath his blanket a loaded musket with barrel short-
ened by filing off the top for readier concealment. They were
again admitted within the fort, only to find the garrison, about 120
men of the 39th Regiment, drawn up in arms on parade, as if for
drilling. The disconcerted plotter contrived to make a friendly
speech, and was allowed to retire, after a calm reply from Glad-
win, and the bestowal of some presents. The British commander
knew the full extent of the danger involved in a combined Indian
war, and he did not choose to provoke an immediate outbreak by
the seizure of Pontiac in the commission of detected treachery.
He may have hoped that the failure to surprise one of the chief
British posts would be a damper to the whole undertaking.
On May gth, however, during a church-festival, Pontiac came
again with a large number of Ottawas, and found the front gate of
the fort closed against him. On his demand for admittance,
permission was granted to himself and a few chiefs, but to none of
their followers. Pontiac went away in a rage, and his men outside,
starting from ambush, with loud yells, rushed to a neighbouring
house, slew and scalped an Englishwoman and her family, and
seized and murdered two officers, Sir Robert Danvers and Lieu-
tenant Robinson, who were on duty above Detroit. A regular
siege of Fort Detroit began at the dawn of f;he next day,
hundreds of savages surrounding the place and maintaining a
continual fire from the cover of barns, fences, and bush. A
six hours' fight ended in a repulse of the assailants, who then
resorted to a blockade of five months' duration, enlivened by
renewals of attack by fusillade. Gladwin, the commandant,
had provisions in store for only three weeks, but supplies were
obtained from friendly French settlers, and he and his men were
resolved to defend the post to the death.
The attack on Detroit was the signal for assaults on the other
western posts. Sandusky, on an arm of Lake Erie, a block-house
with an inclosure, was seized by Indians on a pretence of friendly
conference. The few men in garrison were murdered. The com-
mandant was carried a prisoner to the Indian camp before Detroit,
where he was beaten by the squaws and children, compelled to
dance and sing for their diversion, and only saved from death by
250 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
torture through the affection which he inspired in an elderly
Indian widow, who claimed him as a substitute for her deceased
mate. From her embraces Paulli managed, in time, to escape to
Gladwin within the fort. Fort Saint Joseph, on the river of that
name, was surprised, with the murder of nearly all the garrison of
fourteen men. On June 27th Fort Miami, with a dozen men, was
taken, when Holmes, the officer in charge, had been lured forth
on pretence of his help as an amateur doctor being needed by a
sick Indian woman. He was shot dead through the treachery of
a young squaw acting the part of his Delilah. Misfortune dogged
the steps of the British at every turn. Lieutenant Cuyler, of the
Queen's Rangers, with nearly a hundred men, was in charge of ten
bateaux, or barges, conveying stores from Fort Schlosser, above
Niagara Falls, for Detroit and other western forts. On the
northern shore of Lake Erie, he was attacked by a large force of
ambushed Indians. A panic ensued, and he was driven back to
whence he came with the loss of nearly all the boats and supplies,
and three-fifths of his men. Of these, fifty became prisoners, and,
being conducted to Pontiac's camp before Detroit, they were
mostly killed by burning, after the most atrocious tortures and
mutilation. It was on May 3Oth that the beleaguered garrison saw
with joy the approach up the river of the expected boats, only to
find that the vessels were in the hands of foes, with the British
escort as captives on board.
A cunning stratagem was employed in the surprise of the
important post called Michillimackinac, a fort on Lake Michigan.
The Indians of the vicinity were Ojibeways and Ottawas. The
garrison was under the command of Captain Etherington, a man
who had lived on friendly terms with the natives, and had no
reason to apprehend hostility. On June 4th, the officers and men
were invited by some Ojibeway chiefs to witness a game of La
Crosse between two teams of native players. The fort gates were
left open, and the soldiers were mostly on the ground outside as
spectators. The squaws, in their blankets, strolled in and out,
hiding the weapons of the men, their brothers and husbands, who
were engaged in play. The ball was driven up near to the fort,
and the rush of the players, with eager cries, was suddenly changed
to an attack on the troops with the whoop of war, the savages
wielding with dire effect the tomahawks handed to them by the
CANADA UNDER BRITISH RULE. 2$ I
women. Etherington and Lieutenant Leslie were made prisoners,
another subaltern and twenty men were killed. Some of the
British captives were rescued by friendly Ottawas. The chief
booty taken by the Indians was fifty barrels of gunpowder. Fort
Presqu'ile, with a small garrison, was surrendered, on threats of
massacre for continued defence, to an Indian force of Pontiac's
from Detroit. Fort Le Bceuf was set in flames after the men had
escaped to the woods. Venango was utterly destroyed by fire,
without a man left alive to tell the tale. The British traders were
everywhere attacked, and Fort Ligonier, between Bedford and the
Ohio, was assailed by parties who were beaten off. The works at
Fort Pitt were efficiently repaired by the commandant, Captain
Ecuyer, who, on July 26th, refused in the boldest terms a summons
to surrender to a body of Delawares, threatening to blow to atoms
any Indian who dared to appear in hostile guise before the post.
There alone, and at Detroit, the honour of the British flag was
well supported. The Indians, elated by the capture of so many
forts, resumed the savage frontier-warfare, wasting the borders of
Virginia and Pennsylvania by the burning of homesteads, the
slaughter and scalping of the males, and the carrying of women
and children into slavery. Hundreds of lives were lost in this last
paroxysm of Indian cruelty and rage, and the surviving settlers
hurried to the eastern towns for safety.
General Amherst, at New York, after long neglect of warnings
received from Gladwin and Sir William Johnson, was forced by
the logic of disastrous facts to recognize the serious danger of the
time. The first duty was the relief of Fort Detroit. An expedi-
tion of nearly 300 men was placed under the command of Captain
Dalzell, an aide-de-camp of Amherst, and a young officer of good
repute and promise. The force left Fort Schlosser, near Niagara,
in a number of barges, and, coasting the southern shore of Lake
Erie, arrived on July 26th at Sandusky. Two days later, during
a thick fog, they were in the river Detroit, and the 2Qth saw them
safe at the fort. A night-sortie on Pontiac's camp was suggested
by Dalzell, and Gladwin, with a reluctant assent, placed the troops
under that brave man's command. The senior officer had little
faith in the chance of outwitting the Indian besiegers. At half-
past two in the morning of July 3ist, a picked body of two
hundred and fifty men quitted the fort for a march of over two
252 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
miles to the enemy's position. Their every step was watched by
Indian scouts, and it is said that the plan had been betrayed to
Pontiac by French Canadians within the works. At two miles
from the fort a severe fire was opened at a spot, still known as
" Bloody Run", where a narrow bridge then crossed a stream.
Confusion ensued in the British ranks; Dalzell was killed after
brave and skilful efforts to secure a retreat, and the detachment
reached the fort at eight o'clock with the loss of over sixty men
killed and wounded. The siege, conducted by more than a
thousand Indians, was continued during August and September,
but no serious assault was attempted. Events in other quarters,
to be soon related, had shaken the confidence of Pontiac's
followers, and the intervention of French officers on the Mis-
sissippi, hinting at the uselessness of further efforts against the
British, caused the chief, at the end of October, to send a letter of
submission to Gladwin. That officer replied in cautious terms,
referring the matter to his superior, Amherst, and the blockade of
Fort Detroit, as winter approached, ended with the dispersal of
the Indians to their homes. Gladwin then prepared himself for
future defence, in case of need, with the persuasion that lasting
peace with the Indians could only be secured by the use of stern
measures of chastisement and repression.
We now turn to events connected with Fort Pitt. The gallant
commander, Ecuyer, of Swiss origin, had a garrison of over three
hundred men when he was attacked, at the end of May, 1763, by
some hundreds of Indians who burrowed in the river-banks, and
kept up a constant fire which did no serious harm. In June, an
expedition of relief was dispatched by Amherst from Philadelphia,
under the command of Colonel Bouquet. The force comprised
about 400 Highlanders of the 42nd and 77th Regiments, with a
small number of provincials from Virginia. On July 25th he
arrived at Bedford, after a most toilsome march over the Alle-
ghanies and through the wilderness, with a heavy baggage-train of
stores, and sheep and cattle for the supply of his troops. Deserted
farms, where the fields were waving with ripened grain, proved
the terror caused by the Indian war, and the troops, as they
advanced, learnt the capture or destruction of Forts Presqu'ile, Le
Boeuf, and Venango, which left more foemen free to oppose their
progress to the rescue of Fort Pitt.
CANADA UNDER BRITISH RULE.
At Fort Ligonier, fifty-five miles from the beleaguered post,
the waggons and stores were left behind, and Bouquet pressed
forward, taking some hundreds of pack-horses laden with flour.
He was well acquainted with the road, from the part which he had
played, four years previously, in the expedition led by Forbes, and
this knowledge of every dangerous spot, suited for ambush and
surprise, was of signal service to him in his perilous undertaking.
On August 5th, amidst intense heat, with mosquitoes swarming in
the bush, and when the troops, at one o'clock after noon, had
already marched seventeen miles since the morning's start, the
advance-guard was briskly attacked near a creek called Bushy
Run, twenty-six miles from Fort Pitt. Two companies of the
42nd drove the Indians from their ambuscade, and then the front
and both flanks were assailed by large numbers of Shawnees and
Delawares. A desperate conflict ensued, in which the British
troops displayed the most noble resolution, endurance, and valour.
The enemy, driven off at this point and that with the bayonet,
constantly reappeared, and reinforcements, arriving from the
besiegers of Fort Pitt, enabled them to surround the column on
all sides. After seven hours of incessant strife, the hard-pressed
Britons formed in a circular phalanx round a space which contained
the wounded, protected from chance shots by the bags of flour,
with the horses of the convoy as a further barrier. The brief
darkness of the summer night gave a respite, during which the
soldiers lay beside their weapons. Sixty men and officers had
fallen, and at daylight the troops, harassed by the want of water,
which Bouquet, in his dispatch to Amherst, describes as " much
more intolerable than the enemy's fire ", were again forced to stand
and face hosts of furious foes. The value of discipline and of the
steady self-reliance and mutual trust of civilized troops was never
more finely displayed than in this arduous struggle, at great odds
of numerical force, with savages fighting on ground selected as the
best arena for the employment of their special modes of warfare.
Hour after hour, as the sun rose higher in the heavens towards
noon, the weaned British, half-wild with thirst, kept an unbroken
front to the foe, repelling with the bayonet many a wild rush, and
steadily replying to the fire from the woods. A clever device of
Bouquet's at last brought relief to men who appeared doomed to
destruction from the mere iteration of attacks ever repulsed and
254 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
ever renewed. No courage could cope with the exhaustion due to
interminable strife with enemies who could not be wearied into
withdrawal, or forced from the field. Two companies were recalled
from the outer circle towards the centre, as if beginning a move-
ment of retreat. The Indians, giving an exultant yell, rushed
forward in a mass, with a heavy fire. They were firmly met, and,
in the midst of the new conflict, their flank was assailed by the
nimble Highlanders who had retired, and made a compass unseen
to a point fit for a sudden and effective charge. The savages were
taken wholly by surprise. They broke and fled, receiving on the
open ground the close fire of two other companies moved forward
in support, and pursued with the bayonet by men as swift-footed
and active as themselves. The battle was won. Water was soon
obtained at Bushy Run, where a camp was formed for the special
protection of the wounded men. The total loss amounted to 115,
of whom 50, with three officers, were killed.
The expedition reached Fort Pitt on August nth, after a
victory memorable both as the issue of the last great conflict with
the Indians during British rule, and for the decisive effect wrought
upon the minds and hearts of our uncivilised foes. The siege of
the fort had been already raised, and the tribes there engaged
never recovered from the blow inflicted by Bouquet and his men.
A few weeks after this success, the careless marching of some
British troops near Fort Niagara permitted a surprise by a large
body of Seneca Indians, in which nearly ninety officers and men
were killed.
In November, 1763, Amherst took his departure for England,
transferring the North American command to General Gage. In
the same month, a storm on Lake Erie wrecked some bateaux on
their way to Detroit, with the loss of seventy officers and men.
The new commander-in-chief took measures, in accordance with
Amherst's advice and with instructions from home, for the estab-
lishment of a lasting peace with the Indians. The northern
colonies, still loyal to the British crown, but often strangely back-
ward in taking a due part in efforts for their own welfare, were
called upon to furnish militia. In April, 1764, a body of two
thousand men, under the command of Colonel Bradstreet, was
ready to march from Albany for Detroit, with a view to chastise
the Indians in that quarter, and to re-establish the garrisons at the
CANADA UNDER BRITISH RULE. 255
forts on and beyond Lake Erie. Bradstreet's force included the
1 7th Regiment, four companies of the 8oth, 1000 militia from New
York, New Jersey, and Connecticut, 50 men of the Royal Artillery,
and ten light field-guns. A contingent of 300 French Canadians,
new subjects of the British sovereign, was added with the reason-
able view of destroying the illusive belief, entertained by many of
the Indians, that France was likely to resume possession of
Canada.
A second expedition, under Bouquet, was organized at Fort
Pitt, for the main purpose of reducing the hostile Indians of the
Ohio valley. At the same time, Sir William Johnson was
employed in negotiations which were likely to prove quite as
effective, in his hands, as any use of armed force. In July, this
able man, so well acquainted with the Indian mind, met more
than two thousand natives at Niagara. There were warrior-
deputies from many tribes of the west — Hurons and Ottawas,
Chippewas, Foxes, and Sakis, with delegates even from Lake
Superior and Hudson's Bay. Of these, the Hurons were the
chief, and in July and August treaties of peace were made with
them and the other tribes, including some of the Seneca Indians.
The Shawnees and Delawares held aloof. Pontiac sent a mes-
senger expressing his desire for peace. Johnson, in his report to
the Lords of Trade, strongly urged the conciliation of the Indians
by a policy of generous treatment, including the bestowal of the
periodical gifts to which they had been accustomed in their dealings
with the French.
It was not until the close of the conference that Bradstreet's
force, on August 6th, commenced their journey, and, embarking on
Lake Erie, reached Presqu'ile on the i2th. There Bradstreet was
met by a number of Shawnees and Delawares, and with these
men, in the absence of authority on either side, he was entrapped
into making a truce which debarred him from using force for
nearly a month. The two tribes were those who had just declined
to meet Sir William Johnson, and the brethren of these self-made
deputies were at that moment engaged in murdering helpless
British settlers on the borders of Pennsylvania. The arrangement
was promptly disavowed by General Gage and Bouquet, and
Bradstreet was ordered to proceed to Sandusky, and there attack
the tribes who had not made terms with Johnson. He allowed
2$6 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
himself again to be cajoled by the Indians, but he did perform the
service of relieving the garrison at Detroit, and enabling the
soldiers to return for rest to the civilized world, after fifteen months
of anxious service, including five of continuous siege. He then
returned from his inglorious expedition, which will be found in
strong contrast with the proceedings of the gallant and able
Bouquet. That officer put aside the tricks and evasions of Indian
deputies by a plain threat of war without quarter, to be averted
only by complete, unconditional, and immediate submission.
This resolute tone had its due effect on some of the tribes, but
others held out or strove for delay, and on October 3rd the troops
under Bouquet marched out of Fort Pitt. The column consisted
of 500 men from the 42nd Highlanders, the 6oth Royal Americans,
and the 77th or Montgomery's Highlanders, most of whom had
been present in the previous year at Bushy Run, and of about 1000
Pennsylvanian and Virginian militia and volunteers. The route
lay through a region hitherto untraversed save by the Indians and
a few fur-traders, and the trail was familiar to none but the
commander's Indian guides. Supplies of food needed to be
carried on pack-horses and mules, and the advance, as a precaution
against surprise, was preceded by three scouting parties, in the
centre and to right and left. The soldiers marched in readiness to
form at short notice a hollow square, in which each company
already knew its place, and could form with speed round the
baggage, tents, oxen, sheep, and pack-animals placed in the middle
of the marching column. Strict silence on the march was enjoined,
and every man was to keep at two yards' distance from the one
preceding him. On a halt, all were to face outwards, in instant
readiness to meet attack. The prudence of these arrangements
was proved, on the fourth day of march, by the statement of a
British prisoner who had escaped from the clutches of the Indians.
This man declared that the natives whom he had lately quitted
had been reconnoitring the force, and had been deterred from
attack, not merely by it's numbers, but by the perfect order
and discipline which they observed to prevail.
On the twelfth day, Bouquet and his men, after passing through
a splendid rolling country, having valleys and hills clothed with
noble trees, and richly watered by brooks and rivers, were at
nearly a hundred miles from Fort Pitt. They had arrived without
CANADA UNDER BRITISH RULE. 257
opposition near to the villages of the Mingoes, the Shawnees, and
the Delawares. A few days' rest was granted, during which two
men sent out by Bouquet arrived with news that the Delawares
were anxious to submit. The commander made arrangements to
meet their chiefs on a clear spot of his own choice, free from all
chance of surprise, with his troops drawn up in imposing array.
Chiefs of the Senecas and Delawares presented themselves with
the wampum-belts that, in Indian affairs, were the indispensable
guarantee of peaceful intentions, and a further proof of sincerity
was given in the present surrender of eighteen prisoners. Bouquet,
in reply, declared his intention of not leaving the country until
every condition made prior to a treaty had been fulfilled, and he
appointed a place, forty miles distant, in the very centre of their
villages, where they were to deliver up every English and French
man, woman, and child, with all negroes, held in captivity among
the tribes, or incorporated with them by adoption, marriage, or any
other means. The firmness of his demeanour, backed by irre-
sistible force, achieved the end in view. Hundreds of white
captives were given up for restoration to their friends, and were
welcomed in the British settlements with many an affecting scene.
Bouquet returned to Fort Pitt on November 28th, and in
January, 1765, his valuable service in procuring a stable peace
with the Indians received an unanimous vote of thanks from the
General Assembly of Pennsylvania. The vile home-administration
headed by George Grenville, a man " whose public acts may be
classed under two heads, outrages on the liberty of the people, and
outrages on the dignity of the crown", deemed Bouquet worthy of
no higher reward than promotion to the rank of brigadier. The
Virginian house of burgesses voted to this distinguished soldier an
honour like to that paid by the Pennsylvanian legislature. The
frontiers of these two leading states had been by him secured
against the molestation so long suffered from the Indians. Pontiac,
discredited with the natives by his utter failure in the siege of
Detroit, vainly strove for some time to stir further hostility to the
British power, and in August, 1765, he felt compelled to make a
complete and final submission. The Indian war incited and en-
couraged by the French, which had begun with the attack on
Detroit, ended on October roth, 1765, after two years and a half
duration, with the surrender of Fort Chartres, on the Mississippi.
VOL. I.
258 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
The flag of France then and there vanished, as the symbol of rule,
from the western continent, save for her brief tenure, at a later
period, of Louisiana.
The conquest of Canada by Great Britain was the dawn of
political education for the French Canadians. They were hence-
forth to be treated as free men, not as feudal vassals, subject
to the personal and financial exactions of impressment for
service without pay, the forced labour of corvfos, and other inci-
dents of seigneurial rule. The backward condition of the country
in the means of mental enlightenment is proved by the fact that,
prior to British rule, Canada had no printing-press. This bulwark
of free institutions was first introduced in 1764, and on June 2ist,
the pioneers of Canadian journalism, William Brown and Thomas
Gilmore, of Philadelphia, issued the first number of the still-existing
Quebec Gazette. From the first, the new rulers had dealt on new
principles with those confided to their charge. The people were
treated as reasonable beings by the publication, in the French
tongue, of the duties which they were required to perform, and of
events which were held to concern them as subjects of a British
sovereign. The death of George II., the summons to take the oath
of allegiance to his successor, the marriage of George III., the
birth of the Prince of Wales, the conclusion of the treaty of peace,
had all been duly proclaimed, and the French were thus admitted
to a knowledge of these and other political events which were
occurring in distant quarters of the globe throughout the empire,
instead of being narrowed, in their mental horizon, to the transac-
tions of their own parishes and their own households. The grand
blessing to the cultivator of the soil was the advent of peace, and
that time for the resumption of profitable labour was heralded by
changes which first aroused the French Canadians of the rural
districts to the conscious possession of a new independence in their
social life. The trade-monopolies were also abolished, and restric-
tions on the dealings in furs were removed.
In August, 1764, came the actual establishment of the new rule,
when General Murray assumed his duties as " captain-general and
governor of the province of Quebec ". A royal proclamation had
promised the establishment of a representative assembly, and of
courts of judicature for civil and criminal affairs " as near as may
be according to the law of England, with liberty to appeal to the
CANADA UNDER BRITISH RULE. 259
Privy Council". It was many years before the first of these pledges
was redeemed, but the prospect of government under English
law caused a steady flow of immigration from the neighbouring
colonies of North America, and from the mother-country. Many
military settlers were attracted by liberal grants of land, according
to the rank of the holders, from private soldiers up to field-officers,
on payment of a small quit-rent, or annual tax, after ten years'
occupation.
The " new subjects ", or French Canadians, soon began to com-
plain of their position as regarded the " old subjects " or British set-
tlers. About five hundred half-pay officers, merchants, and disbanded
soldiers formed at first a dominant minority, engrossing public
offices, and excluding from power, under the law existing in Great
Britain and Ireland, all holders of the Roman Catholic faith. The
privilege of trial by jury made law more expensive, and inconven-
ience was found in processes being conducted in a foreign language.
The pride of the seigneurs, or old French gentry, shrank from the
submission of causes concerning gentlemen to the arbitrament of
juries which might and often did include peasants and artisans.
The small dominant minority, for their parts, rendered unintended
honour to General Murray by jealous complaints of the equitable
treatment by which he sought to conciliate the French Canadians
in restraining the action of mercenary and corrupt place-holders
and place-hunters among the British section. He was, however,
upheld by the authorities at home against petitions for his recall.
An important royal provision, which did much to secure the colony,
in time to come, from Indian troubles, forbade all grants of land
within the fixed bounds of the Indian territory, and all private
purchase of territory from the Indians themselves. The natives
were thus guarded against the greed of settlers and of land-specu-
lators, and the principle of imperial control in this matter has been
acted on down to the present day, and is still enforced in the north-
west of the Dominion.
In the autumn of 1766, Murray was succeeded in the governor-
ship by Sir Guy Carleton. The future career of the former high-
minded and distinguished man was to include a noble, though
unavailing, defence of Minorca, in 1781-2, against an overwhelming
French and Spanish force, during which he rejected, with defiance
and indignation, the Due de Crillon's offer of ,£100,000, with a
26O OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
general's commission in the French or Spanish service, for a betrayal
of his trust by a premature surrender of the fortress, St. Philip's
castle, at Port Mahon.
The new governor, Sir Guy Carleton, who afterwards became
Lord Dorchester, has a reputation of the highest rank in Canadian
history. His character, during a long and chequered public career,
was without a stain, or even a semblance of reason for reproach.
His military merits are far transcended by those which belong to
a ruler marked by moderation, ability, and justice, and by the
unobtrusive work which develops the resources of a country, and
applies with effect the laws which are intended to secure personal
freedom and to maintain the rights of property. The public life
which exercises the strongest influence on human happiness and
prosperity is not always conducive to the personal distinction
acquired by successful and striking achievements in war, and it is
owing to this fact that the fame of Guy, Lord Dorchester, has been
somewhat obscured by that of some far inferior men. As a subaltern
in the 72nd Foot, Carleton, son of General Sir Guy Carleton, of
county Down, did gallant service in Germany during the War of
the Austrian Succession, and became a trusted friend of Wolfe,
under whom he acted as quartermaster-general during the siege of
Quebec. He was also the chief officer of engineers, in default of
suitable men in that branch, and was wounded on the memorable
1 3th of September, which saw the glorious death of his beloved
commander. After fighting with Murray against De L£vis in April,
1760, Carleton took part in the expedition against Belleisle, on the
French coast, and was severely wounded, in 1762, at the siege of
Havanna. Soon after assuming office in October, 1766, Carleton,
in reply to addresses, declared his intention of making no class-
distinctions, " the one difference being between good men and bad".
He took from the first a high tone towards recalcitrant members of
the Council, and stated that he should not only apply for advice in
special cases to such members of the Council as were best qualified
to inform him, but also ask the opinion of persons of good judgment
and character outside that body.
In respect of the administration of justice, the complaints of
French Canadians caused the governor to introduce an important
change. A judicious compromise allowed the old French laws
and procedures to prevail in civil cases which dealt with property
CANADA UNDER BRITISH RULE. 26l
and inheritance, while criminal matters were decided under British
forms and with jury-trial. It was Carleton's strong conviction,
expressed to the Secretary of State, Lord Hillsborough, that, in
order to remove secret feelings of attachment to France and to
reconcile the new subjects to British rule, the French Canadians
should not be excluded from all public employment, and that in this
and other ways it should be made expedient for them to become
and remain devoted to the new order of things. A report of his
on Canadian manufactures in 1769 makes known to us a large
growth of flax, made up into coarse linen, and some working in
wool, with a general estimate that one-third of the population,
numbering about ninety thousand, wore clothes of home manufac-
ture. There were a few tanneries, producing an inferior leather,
and the forges of Saint Maurice made much bar-iron, from which
edged tools, axes, and tomahawks were manufactured. In August,
1770, the governor returned to England for four years, to find
Lord North in power as chief minister. During his absence, a
Swiss Protestant named Cramahe, senior member of the Council,
was lieutenant-governor. He was a man of good ability and
character, who maintained order in the colony during an uneventful
period.
In February, 1774, a petition from some French Canadians
was presented to George III., in which they acknowledged the
kindly treatment which they had met with since the conquest, but
desired to receive complete restoration of their ancient laws,
privileges, and customs, with the full rights of British subjects,
including a share in civil and military employment. Partly in
consequence of this, but rather from the long-felt need of a definite
form of government for Canada, the Quebec Act of 1774 was
passed. This measure was carried in the face of a very strong
opposition from some leading members of both Houses, including
Burke and Lord Chatham, and from the Corporation of London.
The province of Quebec, or Canada, was now made to include the
whole country west of Pennsylvania and Virginia; southwards,
from Lake Erie to the banks of the Ohio, until that river joined
the Mississippi; northwards, to the boundary of the lands held
under the charter of the Hudson's Bay Company; and eastwards,
to the coast, including the territories and islands lately attached to
Newfoundland. Free exercise of their religion, without civil
262 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
disabilities, was secured to the Roman Catholics, or French
Canadians, with the payment of the dues and tithes, by members
of their own church, to the Catholic clergy. The French law
known as " The Custom of Paris " was henceforth to be the civil
law concerning property. The English law was established for
criminal matters. The property of religious orders was specially
excepted from the provision which secured all classes in full
possession of their landed and personal estates. The exclusion of
juries from all civil cases, and the subjection of civil rights to the
operation of a foreign code of law, was greatly resented by the
small British minority, and the king and government were accused
of seeking safety for the Crown's Canadian possessions, by undue
favour to the new subjects, in face of the now formidable discon-
tent of the old American colonies. A legislative council, not to
exceed twenty-three members, and to be composed of at least
seventeen, was appointed to frame legal ordinances, without the
power of levying taxes beyond the local and municipal payments.
The council was to be appointed by the Crown, and its ordinances
were subject to the approval of the king in council. Such, for
seventeen years, was the form of government in the great new
colony of North America. The representative assembly promised
in 1763 was still withheld, in accordance with the terms of the
royal proclamation, which made the grant of this body subject to
such time "as the state and circumstances of the colonies will
admit". The concessions to French Canadian feeling in the
Quebec Act of 1774 have been generally, and, perhaps, with some
justice, regarded as due to a desire for securing the sympathy and
aid of men devoted to monarchy and to the Roman Catholic faith,
against the republican spirit of the mainly Protestant colonies
about to break into open revolt. However that may be, we shall
soon see that the Canadian colonists did remain faithful to the
British crown.
In September, 1774, Carleton resumed his duties as governor
of Canada, and was soon called upon to face a serious condition
.of affairs in intrigues directed from the neighbouring colonies,
followed by armed attack. On May ist, 1775, the Quebec Act
came into operation, and, within a few weeks, news arrived at
Montreal, where the governor was awaiting events, that forts
Ticonderoga and Crown Point, on Lake Champlain, had been
CANADA UNDER BRITISH RULE. 263
seized by the troops of the revolted colonies. At this critical
moment, Canada was almost destitute of the means of defence, the
province not containing as many as a thousand regular troops, or
having at disposal a single armed vessel. It was well for the
British crown that the helm of rule was in such hands as those of
Sir Guy Carleton. To the energy and wisdom of his measures,
and to the calm courage and self-devotion which he himself
possessed, and, in no small degree, inspired in those around him,
the safety of Canada was due when the storm of war began to
beat upon her ill-guarded frontier.
In 1774, the "General Congress" of the American colonies
issued an "Address to the inhabitants of the Province of Quebec",
calling upon the French Canadians to join their confederation in
resistance to the tyranny of the home government. The address
pointed out that the conquered people had not received, under
their established form of government, the rights of British subjects,
in the withholding of representative government, with the power
of self-taxation; of trial by jury in all cases; of the personal
freedom secured by Habeas Corpus; and in being subject to the
power of the governor and council, conferred by the Quebec Act,
to vary the existing laws by the issue of ordinances. There was
much quotation from the Frenchmen's "countryman, the immortal
Montesquieu", and it was averred that the legislative, executive,
and judicial powers in Canada were all, in fact, " moved by the
nods of a minister".
The Canadians did not respond to this appeal, declining to
attend secret conferences, and declaring that their oath not to bear
arms against the British bound them to remain neutral. Most of
the very small Canadian minority, the English-speaking population,
were on the side of the revolted colonists. The prospect of
neutrality among the French Canadians was welcome to the
congress, and an invasion of Canada was planned. Carleton in
vain called on the French Canadians to serve as volunteers, but
raised some troops, both British and French, under the old militia
Act, and Sir William Johnson induced some hundreds of Indians
to serve. The danger was serious. Montreal, with but a hundred
regular soldiers in garrison, contained many disaffected people, and
most of the troops at Quebec had been dispatched to meet invasion
of the province by way of Lake Champlain. No help could be
264 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
obtained from General Gage at Boston, and the government at
home wholly failed to understand the importance of maintaining
a strong hold on the country newly conquered from France. A
thousand men were marching, in September, against Montreal,
under Colonel Montgomery, but they were held in check at Fort
Saint John's, on the river Richelieu, by about five hundred British
regulars. In the same month, a small force under Colonel Allen
was defeated at Montreal by Carleton, and Allen went to England
as a rebel prisoner. The siege of Saint John's was vigorously
carried on by Montgomery, a brave Irishman, and the place was
stoutly defended by Major Preston. As winter approached, how-
ever, the disgraceful surrender of Chambly furnished Montgomery
with a fresh supply of cannon, powder, and provisions, and enabled
him to continue the blockade of Saint John's, where the people
were already on half-rations, and were looking for help from
Carleton. The governor made an earnest attempt to raise the
siege with a body of militia, and a few regulars and Indians. On
October 3Oth, his effort to land on the south shore of the St.
Lawrence, near Longueil, was repulsed by the sharp fire of
Vermont troops under Colonel Seth Warner, and Saint John's,
after a violent cannonade, and when food and ammunition had
almost failed, was forced to surrender on November 3rd. Nearly
seven hundred men, including militia, thus became prisoners of
war to the Congress troops, and Canada was left almost devoid of
regular defence.
Montgomery's march on Montreal compelled the departure of
Carleton, with General Prescott, the staff, and the few soldiers in
garrison, and the town was, on November i3th, occupied by the
enemy. The governor contrived to reach Quebec, while Prescott,
intercepted by some American troops, went as a prisoner to
Chambly. The capital of Canada was at this time threatened by
Colonel Benedict Arnold, the officer who was to become infamous, at
a later day, by his attempt to betray West Point to the British troops,
the enterprise which involved the tragic and cruel fate of Major
Andre\ Arnold was in command of about 1 100 men, chiefly from
New England, with some companies of riflemen from Virginia and
Pennsylvania. By way of the Kennebec, the wilderness, the Chau-
diere, and the St. Lawrence, he arrived on November 8th, after
severe toil for the men, at Point Levis, opposite Quebec. His force
CANADA UNDER BRITISH RULE. 265
was now reduced to about 800, and he found that all boats had
been removed from his side of the river and from He d'Orleans.
Cramahe, the lieutenant-governor of Quebec, had done what was
possible to strengthen the defences, and Colonel Maclean had just
arrived with some new levies, but the whole number of soldiers
was less than three hundred men. Two war-ships were at
Quebec, and a council of war resolved to keep the vessels during
the winter, to land the crews for the reinforcement of the garrison,
and to defend the place to the last extremity. An embargo was
also laid on some merchantmen in port about to sail, and their
crews were enrolled among the defenders. About 350 volunteers,
British and French Canadians, answered an appeal to take up arms.
On November I4th, Arnold and his men crossed the river in
canoes made for the purpose, and ascended the cliff by the
historical pathway at Wolfe's Cove. His demand for a surrender
was treated with contempt, and, being without artillery and almost
destitute of ammunition, he could not risk an assault, and retired
to Pointe-aux-Trembles, 20 miles west of Quebec, and awaited the
junction of Montgomery's forces.
When Carleton arrived at Quebec on November 2Oth, the city
and fortress were the only part of Canada that remained under
British rule. The governor took prompt and vigorous measures.
All suspected persons were driven from the town, the entire
population of which was then about five thousand. The garrison,
with provisions for eight months, amounted in all to about 1800
men, who were now to hold the place during a fourth siege in its
history. The possession of Quebec during the winter was of vital
importance to the British hold on Canada, and would determine
the future mastery of the whole country.
On December 4th, Arnold and Montgomery, with twelve
hundred men, advanced to the siege, and encamped in the snow
before the walls. Carleton paid no heed to any messages. The
poor artillery of the foe was a mere mockery to those who manned
the ramparts of Quebec, and the besiegers were wasted by cold
and consequent disease, with the additional scourge of small-pox.
On December 3ist, at four in the morning, while a snow-storm
raged, Montgomery, at the head of five hundred men, tried an
assault of the lower town, where a battery and block-house defended
the western approach. The garrison were on the alert, and a
266 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
volley of grape, killing Montgomery and two other officers, with a
few men, at once swept away for the revolted colonists the hope
of mastering Canada. The assailants retreated, leaving the bodies
of their comrades to be covered with a thickening shroud of snow.
The road taken by Montgomery had been from Wolfe's Cove
along the narrow pass between the heights and the river, now
known as Champlain Street. His body was afterwards taken to
a small log-house in St. Louis Street, which is now an Indian
curiosity shop, and one of the Quebec sights for strangers. It
was buried at the foot of Citadel Hill, but afterwards removed to
New York. Montgomery was one of the most gallant soldiers of
the Revolutionary War, and his fall was fatal to the whole enter-
prise. Arnold, at the same time, with six hundred men, came from
the opposite direction, round by the part now known as St. Roch's
suburbs, below the ramparts, with the intention of meeting Mont-
gomery at the foot of Mountain Hill, and joining in an assault of
the upper town. This plan also met with utter failure. The first
barriers were carried at a rush, but the alarm-bells and the drums
soon brought up the garrison, and a fight in the narrow streets,
amid darkness and snow, ended in the assailants being surrounded
on all sides, with a pitiless fire of musketry raining on them from
the houses. Four hundred men laid down their arms, and Arnold
was left, with a greatly diminished force, daily wasting from
privation and disease, to continue a perfectly useless siege. An
attack on his lines by French Canadians was repulsed, but this
could not affect the issue, and the feelings of the habitans, or main
body of the French people outside Quebec, were sorely offended
by the harsh conduct of the invaders. The New England militia,
in their Protestant bigotry, were the objects of religious aversion
to the simple and devoted Catholics, and the produce of the people
was taken in exchange for worthless " bills of credit ".
The ranks of the besiegers were reinforced to the number of
two thousand men, and in April, 1776, the American Congress
ordered the raising of a strong force, with abundant supplies of
stores, for the conquest of Canada. The effort came too late.
General Thomas, of Massachusetts, arrived before Quebec on
May ist, and found so deplorable a state of things in the besiegers'
camp, from sickness and lack of supplies, that he resolved to retire
at once to Three Rivers. On the following day, British ships
CANADA UNDER BRITISH RULE. 26/
arrived in the harbour, and the Quebec garrison, with a thousand
men under arms, made a fierce sortie on the American camp.
The besiegers fled in haste, leaving guns, their few stores, and all
the sick, to the care of the victors. Thus ended the last attempt
on the stately fortress of Quebec.
During this time Franklin and other commissioners had
arrived at Montreal, urging the Canadians to join the revolt. A
Jesuit named John Carroll, afterwards Archbishop of Baltimore,
used his influence with the Canadian clergy, but all was in vain.
The Canadians would not stir without the help of a large force,
and good pay, in hard cash, for their services. Above Montreal, at
Cedar Rapids, an American force was defeated by the British, and,
on the following day, another body of invaders, at the same place,
was surprised by the Indians and French Canadians.
In June, an army of nearly 10,000 men, under General
Burgoyne, arrived at Quebec, and General Frazer, marching at
once to Three Rivers, attacked and routed 1500 American militia.
The whole of the invaders were soon glad to quit the country, and
Carleton then took steps to clear the enemy from Lake Champlain.
A fleet of twenty ships, with many transports, was constructed,
partly with materials brought out from England, and was conveyed
with great toil to the shores of the lake. On October iQth, the
American flotilla, under Arnold, was utterly defeated near Crown
Point, the vessels that were not captured by the British being
beached and fired by the discomfited enemy.
The events of the American revolutionary war have been dealt
with in previous pages of this history. Carleton had resigned his
commission when General Burgoyne, who afterwards laid down his
arms at Saratoga, had been placed in command over himself, and
he was succeeded in the governorship of Canada by General
Haldimand, a man of Swiss extraction, who maintained a very
stern and unpopular sway. There were many both French and
British sympathizers with the revolted colonists, and Haldimand,
in his zeal to repress all disaffection, indulged in arbitrary arrests
and imprisonments, for some of which the British government,
after actions at law, was compelled to pay damages. By the
Treaty of Versailles, in 1783, Canada lost the fine country lying
between the Ohio and the Mississippi, the boundary between her
territory and that of the new " United States" being fixed by the
268 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Great Lakes, the St. Lawrence, the 45th parallel of north latitude,
" the highlands 'dividing the waters falling into the Atlantic from
those emptying themselves into the St. Lawrence", and the river
St. Croix. Serious disputes were afterwards occasioned by the
vagueness of the words which applied to the watershed of the
Atlantic and the St. Lawrence. The Americans also received
rights of fishing in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, and on the bank and
coasts of Newfoundland, and of landing to cure the fish taken.
Thus arose the perplexing and annoying " fishery-question " which
has not ceased to harass the negotiators of Great Britain, Canada,
and the United States.
In the history of Nova Scotia, we shall see the settlement,
after the Peace of Versailles, of the people known as " United
Empire Loyalists". The just claims of these supporters of the
British monarchy now caused the creation in Canada of the new
province of Ontario. To the west of the river Ottawa lay a rich
and extensive territory which, at the close of the Revolutionary
War, had scarcely begun to be settled. The great region inclosed
by the lakes and the St. Lawrence had less than two thousand
European dwellers, gathered round the fortified posts on the rivers
St. Lawrence, Niagara, and St. Clair. With a view to separating
the Loyalist refugees from the old French population, the home
authorities caused Haldimand, the Governor of Canada, to have
surveys made along the upper course of the St. Lawrence, on the
northern shore of Lake Ontario, and on the rivers Niagara and
St. Clair. During the year 1784 about ten thousand new colonists
were planted in what was soon to become officially known as
Upper Canada or Ontario, on grants of land awarded in the
proportions of from 5000 acres for a field-officer to 200 for a
private soldier. A large vote of public money supplied food,
implements, and clothing in liberal measure to those who were
thus started on a new career, and immigrants from Great Britain
were also attracted to the new province by good allotments of
land.
. Large numbers of disbanded officers and soldiers, with civilians
who were quitting the United States as British loyalists, thus
became the pioneers of civilization and the founders of a new
colony.
In 1785, Governor Haldimand was recalled, and in the
CANADA UNDER BRITISH RULE. 269
following year Sir Guy Carleton, under his new title as Lord
Dorchester, became governor-general and commander-in-chief of
British North America. In 1788, the newly-settled territory was
divided into four districts, each provided with a judge and sheriff,
and justice was administered in Courts of Common Pleas. The
new settlers soon gave great additional force to a movement
among the British Canadians for the repeal of the Quebec Act of
1774. They had strong objections to the existing French law,
and they yearned for the enjoyment of the constitutional rights, in
representative government, which belonged to their countrymen in
the maritime provinces, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. The
government at home, at this time directed by William Pitt, accord-
ingly made a full inquiry, by means of special committees, into the
existing state of Canadian affairs. Commerce, agriculture, educa-
tion, the militia, the law courts and the administration of justice,
were exhaustively treated by commissions working under the
presidency of Lord Dorchester. It appeared to Pitt needful to
guard against the danger of further colonial rebellion by the
continued existence of separate provinces, containing populations
mainly of different nationalities, religions, languages, and feelings.
A French province would, it was believed, be a check upon the
aspirations for independence which might be indulged by the
British. The British province would be ready, it was supposed,
to act against possible French attempts at revolt from their recent
conquerors. This miserable policy of securing practical loyalty,
not by affection, but by jealous counterpoise and check, belonged
to an age which had formed no idea of colonies which should
remain loyally subject to the British crown, in possession of their
own representative system and executive government. Pitt's
plan, however, in limiting the areas of provincial action, and
creating separate provinces, did in a sense originate a future
federal form of rule.
The Constitutional Act of 1791 divided Canada into two
provinces separated by a line drawn from a point on Lake St.
Francis, a little west of Montreal, to Point Fortune, on the
Ottawa, and thence along the course of that river. The official
names of the two territories were Upper and Lower Canada, with
reference to their positions on the course of the St. Lawrence; the
former province (afterwards Ontario) was also popularly known as
270 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Canada West. The whole of the country at this time contained
about 150,000 people, of whom less than one-seventh were found
in Upper Canada. Each province had its own governor, and a
Parliament of two Houses, a Legislative Assembly elected by the
people, and a Legislative Council nominated by the Crown. The
governor had the power of summoning, proroguing, and dissolving
the Houses "whenever he deemed such a course expedient", but
Parliament was to be convoked at least once in every twelve
months, and the elected Assembly, unless it were dissolved by the
governor, was chosen for a term of four years' existence. The
governor could give or withhold the royal assent in regard to bills
passed by the Houses, with a power reserved to the Crown of
disallowing, within two years after their receipt by the Secretary
of State, any bills to which the royal assent had thus been given.
Only subjects of the Crown by birth, naturalization, or conquest
could be members of the Legislative Assembly, and all Legislative
Councillors, clergymen of the Churches of England or Rome, and
ministers of any other religious profession, were ineligible for that
body. The Assembly could raise by taxation a revenue for roads,
bridges, schools, and other public objects, but the British Parlia-
ment alone could impose, levy, and collect customs-duties for the
regulation of trade between the two provinces or between either of
them and any other part of the king's dominions, or any foreign
country. The appropriation of moneys so levied was, however,
left to the Legislature of each province. The control of all naviga-
tion and trade lay with the British Parliament. For the support
of a Protestant clergy an allotment of Crown-lands was made in
each province to the extent of one-seventh of the value of such
lands. The assignment of these "Clergy Reserves", as the lands
were called, became in aftertime the cause of much trouble and
discontent. The governors were empowered to erect and endow
parsonages, and to present incumbents, subject to the spiritual and
ecclesiastical rights of the Bishop of Nova Scotia.
We must here notice the important provision of the Act
concerning the tenure of land in the new province, or Upper
Canada. The old, or seigneurial, system of land-holding, which
was retained after the conquest, was ill-suited to the British
immigrant, who wished to be the absolute owner in freehold of his
farm-lands and buildings, and specially objected to making feudal
CANADA UNDER BRITISH RULE. 2/1
payments to a Catholic seigneur, or lord of the soil. The new
law, therefore, enacted that all lands in Upper Canada, and in
Lower Canada, at the desire of the grantee, should be henceforth
assigned "in free and common socage", a virtually freehold tenure
dependent on the performance of some certain, definite, and
honourable service.
The Legislative Council was to consist, in Upper Canada, of
not fewer than seven, and in Lower Canada, of at least fifteen
members, appointed by the Crown for life. For the election of
members to the Legislative Assembly each province was to be
divided into districts or counties, with limits fixed by the governor,
and from these districts, and from certain cities or towns, at least
sixteen members in Upper Canada, and not fewer than fifty in the
French province, were to be chosen under defined franchises.
The county-members were elected by owners of land to the net
annual value of forty shillings, and the borough-members by free-
holders to the annual value of five pounds, or tenants of houses at
the annual rent of ten pounds and upwards.
Such was the constitution under which Canada existed for half
a century, ending in 1841. One of its chief provisions, the
nomination of the Legislative Council by the Crown, was strongly
opposed in the House of Commons by Charles James Fox, as
inconsistent with popular rights. After the inauguration, in 1792, of
the new form of rule, an Executive Council came into existence,
composed of judges and other salaried officials, acting as private
advisers of the governor, holding seats, as a rule, in the Legisla-
tive Council, and not responsible either to the governor or to the
Legislative Assembly. Their influence and action gave rise to
much popular jealousy and discontent.
In Lower Canada, the first Legislative Assembly, meeting at
Quebec in December, 1792, contained 15 British members out of
fifty, and it was decided that debates should be conducted, and that
the Journals of the House and other official documents should be
printed, in both languages, English and French. The first Lieu-
tenant-governor of Upper Canada was Mr. Simcoe, who had sat
in the British House of Commons, and had commanded a royal
regiment during the Revolutionary War. He proved himself to
be an energetic, wise, and honourable man, with a real concern for
the welfare of the province. The seat of government was placed
2/2 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
at Newark, a village at the mouth of the Niagara river, and the
first session of Parliament, lasting five weeks from September 1 7th,
1792, saw the passing of bills which established English civil law
and trial by jury, and introduced methods for the easy recovery of
small debts, and plans for the erection of court-houses and prisons
in each of the four districts of the province. The Newark Gazette
inaugurated the newspaper-press of Upper Canada. Kingston, at
the north-east corner of Lake Ontario, founded on the site once
occupied by Fort Frontenac, became the chief naval and military
station, and in 1797 the seat of government was removed from
Newark to York, afterwards the flourishing city of Toronto, on the
north-west coast of the same great inland water.
The removal of Governor Simcoe, in 1796, to the charge of
San Domingo was a misfortune for Upper Canada, in causing the
lapse or the retardation of sound and vigorous schemes which he
had formed for the promotion of the fisheries, agriculture, and other
means of colonial development. It is interesting to note, as a sign
of the condition of Upper Canada at this period, the offer of rewards
for the heads of bears and wolves. The close of the eighteenth
century saw the new colony rapidly progressing in population, trade,
and wealth won through labour directed to the natural resources
of the region. Many immigrants from Ireland were sent thither
by the troubles of 1 798, and a brisk commerce arose with Albany
and New York by way of the lakes and rivers, as the rapids of the
St. Lawrence hampered communication with Montreal and Quebec.
The introduction of slaves into the province was forbidden, and a
limit was placed on the duration of servitude for those who were
held as property by masters.
In 1797, Lord Dorchester, after many years' valuable service
rendered to Canada, resigned his post as governor-general, and
returned to England after receiving from those whom he had ruled
many warm expressions of regretful esteem. He was succeeded in
his office by General Prescott, an able and courteous man of firm
and kindly character, under whose administration the commerce of
the country had a rapid growth, and the defences of Quebec received
a great accession of strength. Passing for a moment into the
nineteenth century, we may record that a decision of Chief Justice
Osgoode of Montreal, in 1803, rendered slavery illegal in Lower
Canada, and the few slaves surviving from the old French dominion
CANADA UNDER BRITISH RULE. 273
were thereby emancipated. From that day forward Canada had
the glory of affording a place of refuge, an asylum of freedom, for
slaves who escaped from bondage in the southern states of the
American Union.
Thus was the great British colony in North America fairly
started on her career. The most important fact in her political
and social system was the existence, through conquest, of two
European nationalities side by side. The British and Protestant
element of the people was vastly outnumbered by the Catholic
French, and the diversities of race and religious faith were, as we have
seen, fully recognized in the Constitutional Act of 1 79 1 . The French
dream of forming a great empire beyond the Atlantic had faded
away, and the combined feudal and ecclesiastical sway inaugurated
and fostered by the court of Versailles had been superseded by a
system of rule in which personal, political, commercial, and religious
freedom was to be the main agent in developing a vigorous and
flourishing national life. The French Canadian was then, as he
remains, a most picturesque and interesting portion of the new
community. With him, feudalism slowly died away, but in all other
points of social character and life the French colonists have con-
tinued to display an innate and strong conservative tone. Neither
in politics nor in religion were these sturdy colonists affected by
the vast changes wrought in the country of their forefathers by the
first and greatest French Revolution. Their devoted attachment
to the Catholic faith and to monarchical rule made a gulf between
them and the Jacobins of Paris and the other great towns of France,
and to this day a marked diversity exists between the Frenchmen
of Canada and of the valley of the Seine. The existing loyalty of
the French Canadians to the British Crown had its origin in the
worldly-wise rather than generous policy which caused British
rulers, on the revolt of the American colonies, to use the most
considerate and kindly methods of government with those who had
so recently been forced into allegiance to hereditary foes. The
issue was good both for rulers and ruled. The French Canadians
stood firm amid temptations to rebel, and they came, in due season,
to enjoy in return a liberty in all ways as complete, as secure, and
as much to be desired, as any that republics provide for their citizens.
The French of Canada are also a solitary example of real French
success in colonial life, and their position at this moment is a
VOL. I. 18
2/4 °UR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
vindication of the aspirations and efforts of Cartier and La Salle,
of Richelieu and Colbert. The superior energy and resources, for
a trans-Atlantic struggle, of the great European enemy of France
did, indeed, reduce to a very limited scale the magnificent plans of
the explorers and statesmen who hoped to see their country supreme
in the whole vast region from the Lakes to the Gulf, and from
the Ohio and Mississippi to the Pacific shores. The people whose
ancestors were subdued by the genius of Wolfe and by the valour
of his men form a very attractive and valuable relic of a state of
things which has passed away. Their conquered progenitors
quickly settled down into a quiet and contented life in the village
and the town, in clearings by river and lake, and amid forest-
wilds, while Europe was convulsed by the longest, most destructive,
and most costly war of modern days.
CHAPTER VIII.
NEWFOUNDLAND— NOVA SCOTIA — NEW BRUNSWICK — PRINCE EDWARD
ISLAND.
Discovery of Newfoundland— Visits of English and foreign voyagers — Customs regulating
the fisheries — The English flag planted on its coast — Importance of the cod-fishery
— Neglect of mining and agriculture — Attempts to colonize by the English — Lord
Baltimore's colony — Wise rule of Sir David Kirke — Claims of the French to part of
the island — Contests with the French — Newfoundland finally ceded to Britain —
Captain Osborn its first regular governor — St. John's seized by the French, but
recaptured — After-history of the island — Nova Scotia or Acadia — A Scottish settle-
ment at Port Royal — The country restored to France — Strife among the French
settlers — Cromwell's expedition to Port Royal — Joint occupation by English and
French — Acadia ceded to France — Contests between the English and French
settlers — Sir William Phipps' expedition against Port Royal — The place surrenders
to a British force — The colony becomes a British possession — Difficulties with the
French inhabitants — Governorship of Paul Mascarene — Arrival of English emigrants
— Difficulties with the Acadians — Their expatriation — Representative government
established — The colonies of New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island.
Newfoundland takes a just pride in ranking herself as the oldest
of the British colonies. The island, according to the best evidence
now attainable, was discovered in the summer of 1497, either on
May 6th, Saint John Evangelist's day, or on June 24th, the day
assigned in the calendar to Saint John Baptist. In either case, we
have here the source of the name afterwards given to the chief
NEWFOUNDLAND. 275
town. The discoverer was, as we have seen, either John Cabot
or Sebastian Cabot, one of his sons, it being uncertain whether or
not the father accompanied his son on this and some succeeding
voyages. John Cabot, the Italian form of whose name was Cabotto
or Gabota, appears to have been by birth a Genoese, who became
a citizen of Venice, and settled about 1472 at the flourishing port
of Bristol. He was an enterprising merchant, and a good
geographer for that age, and his aims included both the obtaining
of fish from the coasts of North America, so as to share in the
Icelandic trade to Italy, and arrival at the East by a new route,
for the purpose of getting spices in the wondrous country called
"Cipango", or, by Marco Polo, "Zipangu", afterwards altered
to " Japan ". This region at that time was regarded as a place of
the greatest wealth in spices, gems, and gold, and had great charms
for explorers in that epoch of the world's awakening to the existence
of new lands beyond the seas. It was a haunt of fish and fogs,
instead of mines of gems and gold, that was to be reached by the
Cabots. The news of the discovery made by Columbus was a
great incitement to these adventurous spirits, and they gladly
received from Henry the Seventh a patent conferring certain privi-
leges, on condition of the king's sharing profits which might accrue,
and empowering them to go forth on a voyage of discovery and
colonization.
In the spring of 1497, Sebastian Cabot, with or without his
father, sailed from Bristol in the Mathew, on the way to " Zipangu".
The voyagers really reached the coast of Labrador, and were thus
the first discoverers, in that age, of the continent of North America,
fourteen months before Columbus, in his third voyage, arrived at
the mainland. They may have planted the English flag on the
coast, and, two days later, they sighted the region afterwards called
Newfoundland. It is useless now to strive to ascertain the part of
the coast first seen. Sebastian returned with his ship to Bristol,
after sailing for some hundreds of miles down the American shore,
and in Henry the Seventh's " Privy Purse expenses " we have the
entry, under "August loth, 1497", "To him that found the new
Isle, ^10". In justice, the name of Cabot would have been
bestowed on some large part of the North American mainland, but
the place of Sebastian's burial is unknown, nor has he any memorial
on the map save the name recently given, by the Newfoundland
2/6 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Legislature, to a group of barren islands lying on the east
coast.
The fishermen of Europe were soon to discover that the seas
around the new-found region were an inexhaustible mine of wealth,
far transcending all that comes from natural deposits of gold or
precious stones. The name of " Bacalaos", or, land of codfish,
was soon bestowed on the island, surviving in Bacalhao Island of
Notre Dame Bay. The natives are described by an old writer as
clad in skins of bear, marten, and sable, living on flesh, fish, and
other things, all eaten raw, white in complexion, and worshipping
the sun, and moon, and many idols. The subsequent voyages of
Sebastian Cabot were chiefly in search of the "north-west passage"
to eastern Asia, and do not concern the present narrative.
In 1501, Caspar de Cortereal, a Portuguese navigator, being
sent forth to find a westward route to India, visited Newfoundland
and some adjacent parts. Little heed, for nearly a hundred years,
was paid by England to the island which had been discovered for
an English king, and the cod-fishery was largely carried on by
mariners from Portugal, France, and Spain, before English vessels,
in any great number, appeared in those waters. In 1517, about
fifty ships from those European countries were engaged in the
industry, supplying a grateful addition to the Lenten fare of those
who faithfully observed the injunctions of the Church. It was
under Henry the Eighth that English voyagers again arrived at
Newfoundland. An expedition, supported by Wolsey, and com-
posed of two ships under the command of Captain Rut, sailed
forth "to seek out the land of the great Cham", a title bestowed
on the ruler of Tartary. Albert de Prado, a Canon of St. Paul's,
was on board, for the purpose of making report to the cardinal and
the king. One of the ships was sunk in a storm; the other, carry-
ing De Prado and Rut, reached St. John's Harbour, Newfoundland,
where they found lying for the fishery eleven Norman, one Breton,
and two Portuguese vessels. This occurred in 1527.
Nine years later, two ships, fitted out at the expense of
Mr. Hore, a London merchant, sailed from Gravesend, and
reached the great island, where the crews were nearly starved to
death, and were saved only in the last extremity by the coming of
a well-found French vessel. In 1542, Roberval, the Picard noble
whom we have seen as Viceroy of "New France", thought that he
NEWFOUNDLAND. 277
had found on the coast of Newfoundland gold and diamonds in
substances which proved to be iron-pyrites and glittering quartz.
The development of the fisheries was such that in 1578 there were
four hundred European vessels engaged, including 150 French,
and 200 English, Spanish, and Portuguese. According to this
informant, Hakluyt, only forty or fifty of the number were English,
but our masterful countrymen are declared to have then been
"commonly lords of the harbours where they fish", and to have
" helped themselves to boat-loads of salt and such", in payment for
protecting the other European vessels against "rovers" of the sea.
It is curious to note the customary law existing among the New-
foundland fishers of those times. Whatsoever ship first arrived
from England, Wales, or Berwick in the spring, her captain became
"fishing-admiral" for the season, and exercised authority in dis-
putes as a governor. The English merchants showed much
jealousy as to the profits of the cod-fishing, and, in their desire for
monopoly, they checked attempts at settlement by procuring Orders
in Council which forbade anyone to dwell within six miles of the
coast, and compelled the captains of fishing-ships to leave none of
their crew behind on sailing for the English shores.
In the later days of Elizabeth, Newfoundland was, at last,
formally occupied for the British Crown. The gallant Sir
Humphrey Gilbert, elder half-brother of Sir Walter Raleigh,
was a native of Dartmouth, and educated at Eton and Oxford.
Intended for law, he chose arms as his tools, and fought with good .
success against rebels in Ireland, and for the Protestant cause in
the Netherlands. After losing his own and his wife's fortune, in a
fruitless western voyage with Raleigh, he sailed from Plymouth in
June, 1583, and, under a charter granted by Elizabeth five years
before, for the discovery and occupation of "heathen lands not
actually possessed of any Christian prince or people", he went
ashore in Newfoundland, and, receiving feudal symbols of turf and
twig, raising the English flag, and erecting a wooden pillar, with
the English arms engraved on lead, he assumed possession of St.
John's and the neighbouring coast for 200 leagues. Various pro-
clamations were made in the queen's name, and then the little
squadron, now composed of three vessels left out of five, sailed
away to the south. The fate of Sir Humphrey is an oft-told tale.
The largest of the ships was lost off Cape Breton, and the leader,
278 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
with the Golden Hind, steered for home, himself on board the
Squirrel, a tiny craft of but ten tons burden. The master of the
Golden Hind, Captain Hayes, tells us that "on Monday, September
9th, the Squirrel was near cast away, yet at that time recovered ".
A heavy sea was running, as Gilbert sat astern, book in hand, and
he called out to his comrades of the other ship to "be of good
heart ", since " we are as near to heaven by sea as by land ".
These were the hero's last-recorded words. On that same night,
the men on board the Hind saw the lights on the Squirrel suddenly
vanish, as she was "devoured and swallowed up by the sea".
Under James the First, Sir Francis Bacon was a patentee with
John Guy, a Bristol merchant, in 1610, and other "adventurers", in
an attempt to form a settlement at Conception Bay, but the enter-
prise came to nought. Five years later, the English Admiralty
appointed Captain Whitburne, of Exmouth, who was one of
Gilbert's comrades, to hold courts at the island for the people who
went to fish. The "banks" and the coasts at this time were the
resort of about three hundred English vessels, and the industry, as
a whole, had become one of vast importance. Whitburne waxes
enthusiastic in his praises of Newfoundland, declaring that the
region produces " all that the world can yield to the sustentation of
man ". Wholesome air, abundant fish, fresh and sweet water, are
the matters that he specifies. It is remarkable, however, that to this
day the island has not been largely tilled, nor even fully explored.
The one great and most profitable industry drew men away from
attempts at mining and agriculture. The land had, as will be seen,
its periods of strife, on its rocky coasts and in its countless bays
and creeks, from the days when the French and English began to
contest the mastery of the eastern part of North America. The
position of Newfoundland made it in those days of great value, in
commanding the entrance of the St. Lawrence, and in being
flanked by the seas which, in the hardy fishermen, nurtured and
trained sailors for the home and colonial navies.
At last, in 1624, a regular attempt was made for the coloniza-
tion of Newfoundland. Sir George Calvert, afterwards Lord
Baltimore, received from James the First a patent granting him
the southern part of the island, and proceeding thither with the
needful equipment, he established himself in the peninsula called
Avalon. The name was taken from the earthly paradise of Celtic
NEWFOUNDLAND. 2/Q
mythology, a mysterious green islet in the region of the setting
sun, where the magical apples grew, and Arthur and other heroes
rested happy after death. Calvert built a mansion for himself and
household at a place called Feryland, about forty miles from Cape
Race, and, erecting granaries and other needful buildings, with
a fort for protection, he embraced the life of a true colonist. The
settlement was, however, exposed to French attacks, one of which
failed in 1627, and the people of some small settlements of Puritans
were hostile to Lord Baltimore because he was a Catholic. These
were the causes of his subsequent migration to the colony which he
founded, as we have seen, by the name of Maryland. In 1629 he
had already written to Charles the First that the climate and the
Puritans combined were trying the patience of his followers and
himself, and it was in the autumn of that year that they left the
island. Eight years later, Sir David Kirke succeeded Lord Balti-
more as the king's grantee, and during the Civil War he offered to
provide there a refuge for his sovereign. The Commonwealth
deprived Kirke of his property on the ground that "Charles
Stuart's" grant was null and void. Kirke died, still a devoted
Royalist, in 1656. The period of his possession and rule were,
upon the whole, a time of great prosperity for the British fisheries,
which were protected from piracy, with a revenue derived from a
tax levied on the use of the apparatus called "the stages", which
was employed to dry the fish. The heirs of Kirke were victims of
the ingratitude of a Stuart king. Two of Kirke's younger brothers
bore arms for Charles the First in the Civil War, one being killed
in a cavalry-fight at Edgehill, and the other, at a later time,
knighted for his valour. At the Restoration, the deceased Sir
David Kirke's property was claimed by Lord Baltimore, son of the
original grantee, and, this claim being recognized, the Kirke family
lost the estate. They then justly claimed the payment of sums
expended by their father on forts in Nova Scotia and elsewhere,
and in the improvement of the "plantations" and trade. The
money had been guaranteed by the Treaty of Saint Germain-en-
Laye, in 1632, and reached the formidable amount, in those days,
of sixty thousand pounds. Not a penny of this was received
through the sovereign who was devoted mainly to two objects, his
own pleasures and the friendship of Louis the Fourteenth, the
person responsible for the execution of the terms of the treaty.
280 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
We find that in 1674 the British fisheries were employing
nearly three hundred ships and more than ten thousand seamen.
Twelve years before this, the French had made their appearance
in Newfoundland, by arriving at Placentia on the south coast,
where M. Dumont claimed possession for France, and established
a post for the protection of her fisheries. We have here the
sinister origin of the French claims in Newfoundland, which have
long given such trouble to colonial and British ministers. The
apathy of Charles the Second was a prelude to the betrayal of
British interests in the Treaty of Utrecht by the government of
Queen Anne, and, half a century later, by Lord Bute.
The progress of the colony was greatly retarded, during the
eighteenth century, by contests between those who wished to settle
for tillage, as true colonists, and the dominant merchants and
fishermen, who were intent upon nothing but the capture and sale
of cod. At one time the government forbade all "plantations",
and, when this absolute decree was relaxed in 1696, the whole
number of residents was restricted to one thousand. The authori-
ties in England regarded Newfoundland as a training-place for
seamen to furnish the navy, and emigration for agricultural pur-
poses was persistently discouraged. The "fishing-admirals" who
have been referred to above were expressly recognized in an Act
of William and Mary, and these ignorant men, who were mere
agents of the capitalists in England investing money in the
fisheries, exercised a tyrannical sway over the residents. The
colonists were also greatly troubled by attacks from the French of
Acadia, Canada, and Cape Breton, and, during the war between
William the Third and Louis the Fourteenth, they made deter-
mined attempts at the conquest of the island. The English, for
their part, assailed the French settlement at Placentia in 1692, but
failed to oust their rivals, and a French naval force from Europe
was repulsed by our people in 1694. In the spring of 1697, the
French commander, d'Iberville, dispatched from Quebec by De
Frontenac, appeared off the south coast of Newfoundland, where
.some privateers from Placentia had already burnt, after a fierce
fight, an English man-of-war, and had taken thirty fishing-ships.
St. John's was now captured, burnt, and left in ruins. The little
settlements were ravaged, with the slaughter of many fishermen,
and the prospects of Newfoundland were very dark, when the
NEWFOUNDLAND. 28 1
Treaty of Ryswick brought a brief period of peace. The sove-
reignty of the island remained in our hands, but the French
retained possession of Placentia and some other points on the
south coast.
The shores of the country became again the scene of petty con-
flicts during the great war of Queen Anne's reign. The struggle
had its alternations of success. Early in the war, a British squadron
drove out all the French save from Placentia. The enemy, in their
turn, with privateers from St. Malo and other ports, harassed the
English on the coasts, and made two failures in attacks on St. John's.
In 1708, St. John's was again attacked and taken by surprise, and
the French were practically masters of the island until five years
later. Then the Treaty of Utrecht finally conceded Newfoundland
to British sovereignty, including Placentia, but the unfortunate I3th
Article of that famous arrangement opened a source of continual
dispute and difficulty. The French fishermen were thereby per-
mitted to catch fish, and to dry them on land in that part of the
coast which lies between Cape Bonavista and Cape Riche, taking
the line round the northern point of the island. British settle-
ments were also excluded from that part of the country, and thus
it came to pass that the best lands in the west of the island remained
untilled, and no profit could be made from the metallic treasures
lying beneath the soil.
In order to complete this subject, we pass to the Treaty of Paris
concluded in 1763. In that diplomatic instrument, the British
government, then headed by Lord Bute, most unwisely conceded
to France the possession of the islands of St. Pierre and Miquelon.
The true policy was, in the triumphant position which had been
won by British arms, not to extend, but to annul, the rights granted
by the Treaty of Utrecht. In the Treaty of Versailles, which
ended in 1783 the great war that had cost Britain her American
colonies on the mainland south of Canada, the welfare of New-
foundland and the honour of the country were again neglected.
The boundaries of the coast on which the French might catch and
dry their fish were made to extend from Cape St. John on the east
to Cape Raye on the west, and they were also secured in " freedom
from interruption by the competition of the British ", a provision
which has been by them interpreted to- mean British exclusion from
the use of the soil adjacent to that part of the coast. The colonists
282 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
were, at the same time, under this treaty, removed from the settle-
ments which had been made on the part of the coast reserved for
the French fisheries.
In 1728, for the first time, a regular governor, Captain Osborn,
was sent out to Newfoundland, where he soon had trouble with the
capitalists who controlled the fisheries, and with their agents, the
" admirals " who have been already mentioned as exercising a some-
what arbitrary rule. When the governor appointed magistrates
with jurisdiction in affairs unconnected with the fisheries, the
" admirals " and their supporters claimed that the Act of William
and Mary ousted the Order in Council which set up civil authorities,
but the home-government did not admit this view, and, after con-
tests spread over more than fifty years, the civil powers named by
the Crown were in full exercise of their legitimate jurisdiction. In
1750, the first assize-court was established: up to that time, all
persons charged with felony had been sent to the mother-country
for trial. The settlers derived, as may well be supposed, a pleasant
feeling of security from the transfer of Canada to British possession,
by events which have been already narrated.
The French, however, made a fierce attempt on Newfoundland
before the conclusion of the Seven Years' War. In May, 1762, a
squadron composed of two seventy-fours and two frigates, carrying
fifteen hundred troops, sailed from Brest for the region of the cod-
fishers. Sir Edward Hawke, with seven ships of the line, was
detached in pursuit, but he failed to encounter the enemy, who
landed, on June 24th, at a bay twenty miles to the south of St.
John's. The garrison of the capital, which consisted of a bare
sixty men, through the gross neglect of the home-government, were
taken by surprise, and became prisoners of war, along with the
crew of a war-sloop in the harbour. The place was seized, with
all the merchant-ships and supplies, and the captors at once pro-
ceeded to work at the fortifications, with a view to a permanent
hold on their prize. A convoy of merchantmen from England was
due, and would have entered St. John's harbour to become a further
prey, but for the vigilance of Captain Douglas, who was cruising
in those waters, and, hearing of the French arrival, took measures
to intercept and warn the British vessels. The news reached
Halifax, and Lord Colville, without delay, sailed with his squadron
for Newfoundland, where he was joined, in September, by some
NOVA SCOTIA. 283
eight hundred regulars and a force of provincial troops under
Colonel Amherst. The enemy strove to oppose their landing at
a point seven miles to the north of St. John's, but our men made
their way towards that harbour and stormed a hill commanding the
town. The port was then blockaded by Lord Colville, but the
weather came to the relief of the foe. A heavy gale off shore
drove away the British ships, and the hostile vessels, escaping in
a thick fog, obtained too great a start for successful pursuit.
Amherst attacked the town with heavy guns, and, on the third day,
brought the garrison to terms. A frigate from France, with large
supplies of food and military stores, was captured near the island
by a British cruiser, and, in a possession of three months, causing
severe loss and privation to the people, the French had made their
last serious endeavour at the mastery of the island.
A census taken in 1763 found the whole population a little
exceeding thirteen thousand. The governor, at this time, received
an accession of dignity and power, when, with the additional title
of "commander-in-chief", he had jurisdiction and control over
Labrador, Anticosti, and the Magdalen Isles. In the year follow-
ing, Newfoundland was placed fully under Crown-rule, as one of
the royal " plantations ", and this change was marked by the
appointment of a collector of customs. The old fishery-interest
viewed these matters with great disgust, not lessened by the Act of
1775, which further remedied the abuses based on the statute of
William and Mary. During the war of American Independence,
the island suffered much under loss of trade. In 1785, religious
needs were recognized by the inclusion of Newfoundland in the
diocese of the Bishop of Nova Scotia. During the war of the
French Revolution, the republicans sent a force against the island,
but St. John's was found too strong for attack, and the expedition
ended in some plundering and burning at the Bay of Bulls. The
close of the eighteenth century found the colony under the rule of
Admiral Waldegrave, a man described as humane and enlightened
to a high degree, and devoted wholly to the improvement and
welfare of the people.
The history of Nova Scotia or Acadia, which has been traced
down to the year 1614, was of a very chequered character. We
saw that at that period the French settlement of Port Royal was
ruined by an attack made from Virginia. A few years later, the
284 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
task of colonization was taken up by an enterprising Scottish knight,
Sir William Alexander, afterwards Earl of Stirling, who received
from James the First a charter bestowing the whole of the peninsula
which included the Cape Gaspe district, New Brunswick, and
" Nova Scotia ", a name then first used in place of the French
" Acadie ". At this time, the French had, to a slight extent,
resumed possession, but a small Scottish settlement was formed,
and a fort was built at Port Royal, near the former French town.
In 1625, Charles the First confirmed his father's grant to Alex-
ander, and established a new order of petty nobility called the
"Knights-Baronets of Nova-Scotia", composed of one hundred and
fifty members, who were to receive grants of land, on condition of
planting emigrants thereon. The scheme came to nothing, owing
to arrangements made in Europe between England and France,
which restored the country to the latter power in 1632, under the
Treaty of Saint Germain-en-Laye. M. de Charnisay arrived from
France with forty families, who settled at Port Royal, and the few
Scots who had remained were, in one generation, absorbed in the
French population.
The country was divided into three provinces, each under a
proprietary governor, obtaining a revenue from the fur-trade and
fisheries. De Razilly, the commandant, took the southern district,
and, with the building of a fort and a residence for himself as ruler,
made a settlement on the beautiful and convenient harbour of La
Heve, in the south-east. Charnisay and De la Tour had the rest
of the land, and, on the death of Razilly, the Sieur de Fronsac
became commandant and chief ruler. Bitter strife, amounting to
civil war, arose between De la Tour and Charnisay, during which
the former's wife, whose name is still venerated in Nova Scotia,
won renown by her heroic defence of her husband's fort, leading
her troops sword in hand, like an Acadian Jeanne Dare. In the
end De Charnisay was victorious, but he died in 1650, and, four
years later, the French were dispossessed by an expedition sent
out by Cromwell at the request of the New England colonists, who
had long suffered from the depredations of Acadian privateers.
Once more the British flag floated at Port Royal, and the country
was held by a joint-occupation of English and French until 1667.
In that year, the whole of " Acadia", in its extended sense, was
ceded to France by the Treaty of Breda. For many years there
NOVA SCOTIA. 285
was petty strife between the British and the French settlers, who
quarrelled about the fish and the furs, intrigued with the Indians,
and took part in the contests ever waging between their countrymen
of Canada, on the one part, and of New England and New York,
on the other. The French occupation lasted for forty-three years,
but the colony made little progress, and in 1686 there were fewer
than a thousand people, and not a thousand acres brought under
tillage, the chief occupation being that of the fisheries, combined
with piratical attacks on the commerce of New England.
The war in Europe between Louis XIV. of France and William
the Third would have involved in any case the settlers beyond the
Atlantic, but they needed no stimulus to hostile movements. The
men of New England and of New York were provoked by the
treacherous and cruel attacks of Frenchmen and Indians, and in
1690 Sir William Phipps was sent from Massachusetts to attack
Port Royal. This brave man and skilful mariner, who had risen
by sheer merit from the position of a farm-labourer, had a frigate
and two sloops of war, with some smaller craft, carrying nearly
three hundred seamen and four hundred colonial militia. The
capital of Nova Scotia could not be defended, and the place was
given up, to be subjected to a plundering which violated, with or
without the British leader's consent, the terms of capitulation.
The people were compelled to swear allegiance to the British sove-
reigns, and the territory was formally, under a charter, incorporated
with Massachusetts, greatly to the annoyance of the colonial govern-
ment, who wished for no fresh burdens. They desired William the
Third to garrison Port Royal with regular troops, but a French
expedition arrived at this juncture to relieve their minds of all
responsibility by the recapture of the town. The Treaty of Ryswick,
in 1697, formally restored Acadia to the French possession which
had not really ceased, save for a brief space at the capital, Port
Royal. During the War of the Spanish Succession the colonists
of New England, in 1 704 and 1 706-7, harassed the French Acadians,
and, at the latter time, failed in a siege of Port Royal.
The French governor was now a veteran named De Subercase,
who had long served his country with fidelity and courage in Canada
under De Vaudreuil and De Frontenac. This last French ruler
of Acadia assumed power in October, 1705, and at once devoted
his attention to the needs of the colony, which was in a grievous
286 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
condition from poverty and from the lack of all means of defence
against the people of New England. Like other French governors
in America, he was also troubled by priestly meddling with temporal
affairs. He was destined to be charged with the final struggle for
French retention of the colony. The men of Massachusetts had
resolved to make an end, if they could, of the dangerous presence
of the privateers lurking in the inlets of the Bay of Fundy, or seek-
ing refuge under the guns of Port Royal, and preying upon the
fast-growing trade of Boston. Some damage had been done to
property during the invasion made in 1 707, but the lack of skill in
the officers, and of discipline in the men, had caused the expedition
to withdraw before the energetic defence made by the French
commander.
In 1710, however, the British government took the matter in
hand, and a strong armament, under Colonel Nicholson, went forth
from Boston. The ships carried a regiment of marines from
England, and four regiments of the colonial militia, clothed and
armed at the expense of the crown. Four men-of-war and a
bomb-vessel accompanied the fleet of transports which appeared
before Port Royal. The place was ill-armed, and had a garrison
of only three hundred and fifty men, discontented from want of
proper supplies. The invading force was landed to the north and
south of the town, and a brief bombardment, with the repulse of a
sortie, compelled a surrender, after a week's siege, on honourable
terms. The French troops marched out with drums beating and
colours flying, to be conveyed to France on British vessels. The
name of " Port Royal" was changed to "Annapolis", in honour of
the queen. The people at Port Royal and "within cannon-shot of
the fort " were, by the fifth clause of the capitulation, to remain
upon their estates, in secure possession of all their property, for
the space of two years, unless they desired to leave the country
before that lapse of time, and they were, thereafter, either to quit
the country or to swear allegiance to the sovereign of Great
Britain. It is important to remember this condition, in view of
coming events. Thus did the colony of Nova Scotia finally come
to the British crown, its possession being confirmed, three years
later, by the Treaty of Utrecht. Henceforth, the French made
the stronghold of their power, in that part of America, at Cape
Breton, where they built and fortified the town of Louisbourg, to
NOVA SCOTIA. 287
which many of their colonists from Nova Scotia and Newfoundland
resorted as a place of safe abode. We have seen that the new
settlement became a fresh peril to New England, worse than that
which had existed at Port Royal.
The " Acadians" who remained in Nova Scotia proved to be
troublesome subjects to their British rulers. They numbered less
than eighteen hundred, and had no patriotic regret for the loss of
their French political ties, but they were very ignorant, very
litigious, and very submissive to the priests who taught them that
the British were atheists or worse, and that recognition of their
rule meant the destruction of their own religious faith. In some
parts of the country, small parties of British troops were attacked
and a general spirit of disaffection and sullen hostility was mani-
fested. In 1715, after the accession of George the First, the oath
of allegiance was tendered to the French population, but they
generally refused either to take the oath or quit the country, and
the British government, with rare moderation, allowed the matter
to rest, in the hope that time would work a change in " Acadian "
feeling, or that a new generation would be more reasonable under
just and generous treatment. In 1720, the oath of allegiance was
again proposed, and again declined, but in submissive terms which
promised to refrain from all practical hostility to their de facto
rulers. The people were, in fact, under the influence of a religious
terrorism, and British abstinence from the adoption of strong
measures was largely due to indifference. The priests in the
country were political agents and incendiaries, and the government
at home, under George the First, failed to furnish a garrison of
sufficient strength to exercise a just and needful degree of coercive
power. The politicians in England at that day failed to see, or
did not care to recognize the fact, that a strong government in
Nova Scotia would have promoted prosperity by attracting settlers
from New England to the rich pastures and the valuable mines.
Year after year passed away, while the French, at Louisbourg,
were constantly extending and perfecting their fortifications, under
the direction and with the aid of a government in Europe which
foresaw the value of such a stronghold in operations of re-conquest.
In 1726, some of the French in Nova Scotia took the oath of
allegiance at Annapolis, but it was still refused in other parts of the
country. The people in no way contributed to the expenses of
288 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
government, though they did not fail, in the absence of all law
courts, to harass the council for decisions in their endless disputes.
British ministers — Stanhope, Walpole, Pelham, Newcastle — all
neglected American affairs, and so provided work for the coming
man, William Pitt the elder.
The best period of Nova Scotian history in that age was the
time which included the tenure of power by Paul Mascarene as
acting-governor. This distinguished Nova Scotian, who has left a
record of early British days at Port Royal (Annapolis), was born
of a Huguenot family that quitted France after the Revocation,
in 1685, of the Edict of Nantes. He entered the British army,
and rapidly rose through the exercise of high ability and spotless
integrity. As captain, he was in charge of the first guard mounted
at Port Royal Fort, after its surrender in 1710. He rendered good
service during the initial difficulties of British possession, and
under the nominal governorship of Richard Philipps, who was in
England for long periods, Mascarene became ruler as lieutenant-
governor in 1736. The peace of the community was preserved,
and while the government at home disregarded colonial matters, a
vigilant eye was kept upon perils from within and from without.
A time of trial came with the outbreak, in 1 744, of the war of
the Austrian Succession. A Catholic missionary, Joseph le Loutre,
who had been sent out to work among the Micmac Indians of
Acadia, proved to be a thoroughly false, unscrupulous, and cowardly
intriguer against British rule, a man who first led the French
inhabitants into mischief by spiritual terrors, and then abandoned
them in the day of trial. Outward attack had its origin in the
French stronghold at Cape Breton. When news of the declaration
of war reached Annapolis in June, 1744, Mascarene put the fort in
a defensible condition, being aided therein by some of the French
Acadians both with material and with labour. An attack upon
the workers was made by some Indians, believed to be instigated
by Le Loutre, but they were beaten off, and the scanty garrison of
one hundred men received a timely re-inforcement of about half
that number, including some officers. At the end of August, an
invading force of nearly eight hundred troops, chiefly militia and
Indians, arrived from Louisbourg. Its operations were those of
mere petty warfare, of so constant recurrence in the North American
history of those and of earlier days, and were devoid of military
NOVA SCOTIA. 289
combination and skill. The invaders had no cannon, and could
not inflict any damage on the works, but their superior numbers
enabled them to harass the defenders by frequent night attacks.
The garrison were worn by want of sleep, and the French com-
mander sent a letter demanding a surrender, with the assurance
that he expected the arrival of three powerful men-of-war, with
additional troops, and an intimation that he already had men
enough for a successful assault. Mascarene, in reply, declined to
consider the question of surrender until he saw the French ships
in the bay. Most of his own officers desired a capitulation, but he
managed to persuade them that the Frenchman's aim was to create
division and discontent. A truce which had been made for the
purpose of considering offered terms was ended amidst the hearty
cheers of the men, and Mascarene's courage, energy, and tact sent
all with renewed spirit to the defence of the works. The French
leader's plan had thoroughly failed, and he soon abandoned the
enterprise and returned to Louisbourg.
The popularity of Mascarene's rule was proved at this time by
the declaration of the French settled away from Annapolis, in
reply to agents from Cape Breton who required aid against the
British, that " they lived under a mild and tranquil government,
and had good reason to be faithful thereto ". This favourable state
of feeling was soon to be changed by the spiritual menaces and the
misrepresentations as to temporal affairs diligently used by Le
Loutre and other missionaries. The safety of Nova Scotia for its
British possessors was for the time secured by our capture of Louis-
bourg, in a series of events which have been related. The French
Acadians showed a renewed spirit of hostility by refusing, with
their own pecuniary loss, to supply provisions to the British
garrison in Cape Breton Island. The British ministry, at the
peace of Aix-la-Chapelle in 1 748, displayed the fatuity so common
among our rulers in the eighteenth century by restoring to the
French the stronghold of Louisbourg, so lately obtained at the
cost of British lives and treasure, and a standing menace, in French
hands, to British colonists in North America. The attention of
the mother-country was, however, drawn by this very act to the
position and the needs of Nova Scotia. The retrocession of Cape
Breton Island, and the consequent exposure of our possessions to
fresh attack, rendered necessary the creation of a counterpoise,
VOL. I. 19
2QO OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
in the Acadian peninsula, to the strong position held by France in
the neighbouring island.
The fortress of Louisbourg was evacuated by the British
troops in July, 1749. A few days later, an important event
occurred in Nova Scotia. Colonel the Hon. Edward Cornwallis,
who had been appointed governor, arrived at Chebucto, on the
east coast, with more than two thousand five hundred emigrants,
who were chiefly soldiers and sailors, discharged from the service
in consequence of the peace, and artificers of good character and
skill in their various callings. Parliament had voted forty thousand
pounds for the expenses of the enterprise. The new settlers
received a free passage, with provisions for the voyage; allowance
of food for a year after landing; arms, ammunition, household
utensils and tools for tillage; with free grants of land for settlement
under civil rule, in enjoyment of all the rights then possessed by
British colonists. The name of " Chebucto " was changed to
" Halifax", in honour of the peer who was then president of the
Board of Trade and Plantations. Cornwallis, who was assisted by
a new council, formed a good opinion of the capabilities of the
country which he was charged to rule. His address to the French
Acadians reminded them of the good treatment received by them
at British hands, in the quiet possession of their property and the
free exercise of their religion; gently reproached them with their
hostile demeanour; .and, promising them a full amnesty, called on
them to assist the new settlers, to take the oath of allegiance,
and in all respects to conform to their actual position as British
subjects.
The French settlements were at Annapolis, Grand Pre, Mines
(now Horton), Truro, and other points found along the Bay of
Fundy from Annapolis to the basin of Mines. There were some
others to the northwards, and the Micmac Indians, a tribe of the
Algonquins, a few thousand of whom are still found in Nova
Scotia, Newfoundland, and New Brunswick, were scattered across
the country from near Halifax to the Bay of Fundy. The French
population, at this time, numbered over twelve thousand, but within
the next few years about one-fourth of these were induced by
their priests and by French agents to leave their lands, and to
resort to He Saint Jean (afterwards Prince Edward's Island), and
to Cape Breton colony. The Acadians demurred to taking the
NOVA SCOTIA. 291
oath of allegiance, and were then required, by proclamation, to do
so before October 26th, or to forfeit their possessions and rights in
the province. In reply, the Acadian deputies professed to be in
mortal fear of the " savages " if they became full British subjects,
and refused to take the oath, except with an exemption from bearing
arms against the enemies of Great Britain. They also stated that
the French population objected to the coming of the English to
live among them.
Cornwallis declined to admit any conditions; warned them
against deceivers ; pointed out that it is not an oath of allegiance
which makes men subjects of a king, but that, being so already,
they were required to furnish a sacred bond of fidelity; and that it
was only from regard to their position and their inexperience that
the government condescended to reason with them at all. He
ended by demanding the services of fifty men to assist the new
settlers in building houses for protection against the coming
winter. The French population then resorted to a series of
outrages on the British settlers and troops. In these proceedings,
they were encouraged by emissaries both from France and from
Canada, where the authorities regarded with extreme jealousy the
new establishment at Halifax, as giving to Great Britain a firm
hold on Nova Scotia, enabling her people to block approach by
land from Canada to Cape Breton, and supplying her with a check
on Louisbourg.
The chief difficulty with which Cornwallis had to deal lay in
the extreme ignorance of the Acadians. There were no schools
and few books, and an intellectual condition which made the
French settlers ready victims of the political priests who worked
both with religious and temporal weapons of terrorism. Le
Loutre was at Louisbourg, spreading false stories to the prejudice
of the British rulers in Nova Scotia, and resolving, as he avowed,
to go thither and stir up the Micmacs to war. The Indians were
supplied with powder and bullets, with the full knowledge and
approval of the French government at home, and the missionaries
were ordered to incite the natives to robbery and murder. Twenty
Englishmen were seized at Canso, and an English vessel was
captured. Then two British craft were attacked with the loss of
three lives; four of the new settlers were killed near Halifax while
they were cutting wood for the saw-mill. Cornwallis and the
2Q2 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
council properly declined to dignify the Indians by declaring war,
and, treating them as a mere " banditti of ruffians", they offered a
reward of ten guineas for any Micmac alive or dead, or for his
scalp. A company of volunteers was formed, provided with snow-
shoes, and the woods round the new capital were scoured. Some
of the French, daunted by this firm conduct, then came forward
and helped to construct a road from the sea to the town. As the
Indian outrages continued, the men at Halifax were formed into a
militia, and a regular guard was posted at night. Through all
these matters, Cornwallis acted with the firmness and moderation
proper to his position.
On the frontier, where the peninsula joins the mainland,
French Canadian troops were driven off in 1750 by a British force
under Colonel Lawrence, an able and energetic officer, who built
a fort and barracks at Chignecto, where Howe, a member of the
council, was placed in command. He was a kindly and courteous
man, who was winning his way to a peaceful settlement with the
Indians when he was shot dead from ambush in advancing from
the fort to meet a flag of truce. This foul act of treachery was
perpetrated by some of the savages, incited by Le Loutre. The
French officers, of course, regarded his conduct with horror and
indignation, and Cornwallis described it as an instance of barbarity
and treachery without a parallel in history. In 1751, people were
killed and carried off by Indians near Halifax, Le Loutre paying a
reward for every English scalp. In 1752, Cornwallis, on resigning
his office, returned to England, leaving Nova Scotia as a colony
firmly established, not indeed in the acceptance of British rule by
the Acadians, but with a capital of four thousand people at Halifax,
and with the country secured, in a military sense, by forts erected
at Mines, Windsor, and Chignecto.
It was a point of gross neglect on the part of the British
government and the Church, but, as we have seen, quite consonant
with the moral and religious condition of England at that period,
that there was no religious instruction for the colonists, and no
clergyman, save the regimental chaplains, was sent out to Nova
Scotia. This disregard of duty was in marked and painful con-
trast to what has been related concerning the care of French
Catholics for the spiritual welfare both of their own countrymen
and of the natives in America. As late as 1782, we find a
NOVA SCOTIA. 293
Methodist preacher who visited Halifax strongly remarking on the
wickedness of the town, and the mockery with which his ministra-
tions were received. It is quite in accordance with the lack of
zeal for the saving of souls that an order existed forbidding any
Catholic to become a new settler, and restricting to Protestants all
transfer of landed property.
Colonel Hopson, the successor of Cornwallis, used every means
to conciliate both the Indians and the French Acadians, but it
became clear that the latter, constantly worked on by the mission-
aries and by emissaries from Canada and from Cape Breton, would
not settle down as loyal and contented subjects under British rule.
In November, 1753, Colonel the Hon. Charles Lawrence became
virtual ruler, with appointment as lieutenant-governor in the
following year. He was, as we have seen, a man of ability and
resolution, and, until his death in 1760, he strove to promote the
welfare of the colony. A body of two thousand Germans had
settled, in 1753, at Lunenburg, near Halifax, and the town of
Dartmouth had also been founded.
The year 1755 is the one marked in Nova Scotian history by
the expatriation, or forcible removal, of about seven thousand of
the French population, or nearly three-quarters of the whole
number of " Acadians", in the old sense. Few historical transac-
tions have been more misunderstood and misrepresented than this.
It has been denounced as a piece of wanton and tyrannical cruelty
exercised against an innocent, simple, virtuous, and prosperous
community, living a life worthy of the Golden Age among the
meadows of Grand Pre, fenced from the sea by dykes of their own
construction, and kept in comfort by abundant cattle, crops of
grain, and orchard-fruits. The aid of poetry has been used in
their behalf, and most readers have formed their conception of the
people and of their treatment by their British rulers from Long-
fellow's Evangeline, which has invested the story with a glamour of
romance, amidst much true as well as picturesque description of
"thatched roofs with dormer windows and projecting gables",
vanes on chimneys, gilded by the evening-sun, and " matrons and
maids in snow-white caps and in kirtles Scarlet and blue and green,
with distaffs spinning the golden Flax for the gossiping looms".
Hexameters, however, are not, in this case, history, nor is the
pathos of poetry the same as prosaic fact. The Acadians, after
294 °UR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
forty years of pleading, plain threatening, and forbearance un-
equalled in history, chose to commit political suicide. Their
presence, as passive opponents of British rule, often turned into
the active tools of French intrigue, was a positive danger to the
very existence of Nova Scotia as a British colony. The day of
final and desperate struggle for ascendency in North America had
arrived, and a British governor who had acted otherwise than
Lawrence, in expelling the hostile element from the land which he
ruled, would have betrayed his duty to his sovereign and his
country. Those who complain of the removal of the Acadians
forget that some thousands, with great loss and ultimate suffering,
had already passed into exile from Nova Scotia under the persua-
sions or threats of Le Loutre and other French agents. Those
Acadians who showed a desire to become fully reconciled to
British rule by taking the unconditional oath of allegiance were
menaced with the tomahawks of the savage Micmacs. The
British rulers, in their conduct, are defended by the unassailable
reason of self-preservation, and the fate of the exiles was due, not
to the sins of Lawrence and the council, but to those of their own
countrymen, who deceived them and betrayed them to ruin from
sheer hatred and jealousy of the British conquerors of Nova
Scotia. One of the avowed defenders of this "innocent" people
admits "continued and frequent violations of their professed
neutrality" in the struggle between French and British in North
America, and allows that " three hundred of them had been found
in arms against the British".
With this admission we pass from the region of needless
further argument to that of narration, and proceed to record the
circumstances of the somewhat tragical event. The first step
taken by Lawrence was to place himself in a position to enforce
any order that might be issued by the government. The safety of
Nova Scotia, as a British possession, was in 1754 very precarious.
It was certain that the French in Canada and Cape Breton Island
would attack the country at the first opportunity, and, in the
absence of a British fleet, there was no means of resisting a
powerful armament sent from Louisbourg or Quebec. One point
of danger was the French fort at Beausejour, on the isthmus con-
necting peninsular Acadia with the continental portion which was
later called New Brunswick. A large hostile force of Acadians
NOVA SCOTIA. 295
could quickly be gathered there, and swoop down upon the feeble
garrisons at Fort Lawrence, Annapolis, and other points. Halifax
might be invested by the foe, and forced to surrender from want of
supplies, and, Nova Scotia once recovered by France, the people
of New England would be again exposed to incessant danger and
loss. Shirley, the active and able governor of Massachusetts, took
the matter in hand with vigour, and assembled at Boston a force of
two thousand men, with a fleet of transports, and three frigates.
In May, 1755, the expedition sailed, and anchored on June ist
twelve miles from Beausejour. The fort there was ill-armed, and
at this time had a garrison of but one hundred and fifty men. The
New England troops, marching to the attack, quickly routed four
hundred French and Indians who strove to bar the road, and the
siege was begun by the planting of artillery within seven hundred
feet of the works. The bombardment and the reply were both at
first equally feeble, but the non-arrival of help from Louisbourg,
and the bursting of shells within the fort compelled a surrender on
honourable terms. This success was followed by the surrender of
Fort Gaspereau on Bay Verte, and the French were thus driven
from the threatening position which they had long held in the north
of Nova Scotia.
The garrison at Beausejour had included Le Loutre, who, after
talking of burying himself under the ruins of the walls, fled in
disguise before the surrender, was received at Quebec with con-
tempt both from the civil and ecclesiastical authorities, and died
many years afterwards in France in utter obscurity. A remark-
able episode of his ignoble career occurred at Jersey. The ship on
which he sailed from Quebec for France was captured by an
English frigate, and Le Loutre, fearing punishment for his evil
deeds against the British, took the name of Duprez. He was sent
to Jersey Castle, where he remained as a prisoner of war until the
peace of 1763. One day he was recognized by a soldier on guard,
who had served with the British troops in America, and identified
Le Loutre as having ordered him to be scalped. It was with
difficulty that the man could be restrained from bayoneting the
Frenchman on the spot, and so determined was the spirit of
vengeance that he displayed, that he was transferred to another
post of duty.
After the capture of Beausejour, and with the successful force
296 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
at hand, Lawrence was able to deal with the recalcitrant Acadians.
Their deputies were summoned before the council, and a last
demand was made for the taking of the unconditional oath of
allegiance, on pain of quitting the country in case of refusal. In
every case the deputies declined to take the oath, and the govern-
ment at once provided transports for the removal of the main body
of French Acadians. At Annapolis, Grand Pre", and other points,
the people were gathered in by bodies of soldiers, and informed by
the officer in command that their lands, tenements, cattle, and
stock were forfeited to the crown, with all other effects, except
money and household goods, which they were at liberty to convey
on board ship so far as room sufficed. Little or no resistance was
attempted, and the people were marched on board the vessels,
every effort being made to perform a painful duty with the utmost
possible humanity. At one place it was needful to burn a large
number of houses in order to enforce the order of expulsion. Over
six thousand persons in all were removed, nearly one-third of
whom were taken from the village of Grand Pre, the scene of
Longfellow's poem. The exiles were landed on the coasts of the
British colonies from Massachusetts to Georgia, some being thence
sent over to England, and the rest gradually absorbed among the
colonial population. Besides those who were deported, there
were many Acadians that made their way to Quebec, where they
received poor treatment from those who had encouraged them to
refuse submission to British rule. Some died of want, and, on the
whole, a large amount of misery arose from the expatriation caused,
on a just review of the facts, by the ignorance, obstinacy, and per-
versity of victims led astray by selfish intriguers, and taught to
maintain an unrelenting enmity to the British authority which, for
more than forty years, had extended to a conquered people a for-
bearance alike unequalled and undeserved.
Three years after this event, when the feeling caused by the
removal of most of the Acadians had somewhat subsided among
the remaining French population, it was deemed proper to
.establish a representative form of government which should lend
the authority of popular sanction to the proceedings of the
governor and council. The first Assembly that was ever held
within the limits of the Dominion of Canada consisted of
twenty-two members, elected by the people. They met in
NOVA SCOTIA. 297
the court-house at Halifax, in October, 1758. The Anglican
Church was the legal form of religion, with perfect toleration
for all other sects. Emigration was encouraged by liberal
grants of land, which, in the course of 1759, drew nearly nine
hundred settlers from New England and from Ireland. The safety
of Nova Scotia was fully assured by the conquest of Canada, as
already related, but the joy of the British colonists was damped by
the death of the excellent Governor Lawrence, who expired from
the effects of a cold caught at the ball which he gave to celebrate
the capture of Montreal. When the power of France in North
America had come to an end, there were many French settlers, out-
side Canada proper, that took the oath of allegiance to George the
Third, and a source of trouble was removed when the Micmac Indians
of Nova Scotia made a treaty of peace at Halifax, solemnly burying
the hatchet in presence of the governor, council, and high officials.
The province now enjoyed a rapid increase of population and
prosperity, through the establishment of peace and order, along
with a steady flow of immigration. During the disputes of the
adjacent colonies with the home-country concerning the Stamp Act
and the other matters which led, as we have seen, to the Revolu-
tionary War, the people of Massachusetts in vain strove for
support from the colonists of Nova Scotia, who remained, with
rare exceptions, loyal to Great Britain throughout the unhappy
struggle, in spite of the consequent loss of trade and of mischief
done to the coast-settlements by the attacks of privateers. The
Micmac Indians gave signs of joining the revolted colonists, but
Were kept faithful by diplomacy which included feasting, flattery,
and the bestowal of gifts.
A great impetus was given to the progress of Nova Scotia at
the close, in 1783, of the Revolutionary War. The colonists in the
new " United States" who had remained faithful to Great Britain
were a source of anxiety to both countries. There were many
thousands of "Loyalists", who, in many cases at the cost of the
rupture of family-ties between brother and brother, father and son,
as well as of many friendships, had remained faithful to the old flag.
When the cause of that flag was lost, they were treated with due
consideration by the victors, after much suffering from insult and
suspicion, and sometimes from open violence, during the war.
Large numbers, including many men of high character, position,
298 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
and ability, felt it impossible to become citizens of the Republic.
The government of Great Britain made it a duty to provide for
their future welfare on American soil, and they were invited to
emigrate to Canada and the adjacent colonies on the eastern sea-
board. The "United Empire Loyalists" received above three
millions of money from the British Parliament by way of indemnity
for the loss of estates, and in aid of emigration, and above thirty
thousand people sought new homes from all parts of the States,
but mainly from New England and New York. It is supposed
that about twenty thousand of these settled in Nova Scotia, including
in that term the continental territory to the north-west. Several
thousand settled near Halifax and on the Bay of Fundy, at the
mouth of the St. John river, where they founded the town of St.
John, which was long called Parrtown, in honour of Governor Parr,
who then ruled the colony.
It was in May, 1783, that these refugees came to find new
homes on the site of the present city of St. John. The place was
then covered with pines and spruce-firs, and nothing else was to be
seen but a block-house, a few fishermen's huts, a sprinkling of other
houses and stores for fish and fur, and the blackened ruins of Fort
Frederick, taken and burnt during the war by assailants from the
revolted colonies. Here they began to live on grants of land, and
their arrival was the cause of the foundation of New Brunswick as
a separate colony. They desired to send a member to represent
them in the Nova Scotian Assembly at Halifax, but the governor
was unable, under his powers, to grant this request, and they accord-
ingly petitioned the Crown for a separate establishment. The high
character and intelligence of the five thousand new settlers caused
a ready assent, and in 1784 New Brunswick, deriving her name
from the reigning dynasty of Great Britain, was started on her career.
The colony already had, as settlers on the upper course of the St.
John and on the eastern coast, many of the expelled Acadians, as
well as emigrants from Scotland who, in 1 764, settled on the river
Miramichi. Many of the Loyalist emigrants from the States settled
at Annapolis, in Nova Scotia, and to them also the town of Shel-
burne, on the south coast, owes its rise, with a name derived from
the British statesman, the Earl of Shelburne, who became the first
Marquis of Lansdowne. His descendant, a century later (1883),
was made governor-general of the Dominion of Canada.
NOVA SCOTIA.
299
During the great war with France at the close of the eighteenth
century, Halifax was a naval and military post of high importance,
and became the residence of many persons of distinction from the
mother-country, who gave a conservative and aristocratic tone to
the colony, and, by the free expenditure of money incident to their
position, caused much commercial advance. Edward, Duke of
Kent, who became, many years later, father of Queen Victoria, held
the post of commander-in-chief from 1794 to 1799, and acquired
much well-earned popularity by his excellent conduct and his
bounteous hospitality. The democratic aspirations of the body of
colonists, who now amounted to over fifty thousand, were repressed
by the governor, backed by the council, but there was no breach
of the public peace, and Nova Scotia continued in the path of
steady progress through industry.
In New Brunswick, the first governor was Colonel Carleton, a
brother of Lord Dorchester. He had commanded a regiment
during the Revolutionary War, and was justly popular with the
"Loyalist" population of whom, in November, 1784, he assumed
the rule. A council of twelve members assisted in executive and
legislative duties, and there was a popular House of Assembly,
composed of twenty-six representatives. The first council included
several men of high distinction among the new colonists, as Ludlow,
formerly chief judge at New York, three other judges who had
served as colonels in the war, James Putnam, one of the ablest
lawyers on that side of the Atlantic, and men formerly great land-
owners, who had lost all for the sake of adherence to the cause of
the mother-country. In 1788, the seat of government was removed
from St. John, which was for many years the only incorporated
" city " in British North America, to the present capital, Fredericton,
situated about ninety miles up the St. John river. The place was
selected as being more central, as less exposed to hostile attacks,
and less subject to the democratic influences which might arise in
a prosperous and populous commercial town.
The new colony did not, however, escape conflict on constitu-
tional points between the aristocratic governor and council and
the popular assembly. One dispute arose on the question of pay-
ment for public service to members of the House. That body had
voted the modest sum of seven-and-sixpence per day, during the
session, to each of the representatives. The governor and council
3OO OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
vetoed this, as unworthy of the Assembly, and thus came a struggle,
quite in the old-country fashion, on a money-bill, or question of
revenue. The Assembly, like the House of Commons in Stuart
days, maintained its right to control the appropriation of supplies,
and resorted to the device of " tacking " this particular vote to the
bill for the general expenses of administration. It is amusing to
observe Britons, in the very inception of a new colonial parliament,
mimicking, in earnest and sturdy fashion, the precise methods by
which their sires beyond the sea had held their rights against those
who would fain have ruled with absolute sway. Such men as these
were they who, at a later day, caused British governments, in their
dealings with British colonies, to abandon in despair the old colonial
system, and to leave full rights of self-government to new com-
munities of British people in all quarters of the globe. The
Assembly of New Brunswick had to contend, not only with the
governor and council on the spot, but with the secretary of state
in London, who, on appeal to his decision, condemned their conduct
in " tacking ". The people's representatives maintained their atti-
tude, and for three years, from 1 796 to 1 799, passed no money-bills
at all. The difficulty was at last removed, again in the true British
fashion which has so well served British interests, by concessions
on both sides. The Assembly voted all the money which the
council wanted for general purposes, and the council agreed to the
pocket-money for the members. In this auspicious state of affairs,
with the excellent Colonel Carleton, in a tenure of office for nearly
twenty years, governing the province with admirable skill, we leave
New Brunswick at the close of the eighteenth century. Trade
was in rapid growth. In 1778, British enterprise and capital had
been drawn to the vast supply of fine timber growing on the banks
of the St. John and Miramichi. Three years later, the beginning
of a great commerce in " lumber " or sawn timber was followed by
the launching, at St. John, of the first of a great fleet of ships that
bore the colours of New Brunswick. The noble pines of her forests
furnished masts to many of the magnificent vessels which, in line
of battle, under Nelson and Collingwood, Howe and Duncan, and
many a sea-captain, were to raise the renown of the British navy
to the highest point.
Prince Edward Island was discovered by the Cabots at the
close of the fifteenth century, but no claim to its possession was
PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND. 301
then set up by the English crown. Early in the eighteenth century,
it was occupied by French subjects, Acadians from Cape Breton,
as the He St. Jean. They were attracted by the fertile soil, and
other Acadians had gone thither on the cession, in 1713, of Nova
Scotia to Great Britain by the Peace of Utrecht. Many of the
Acadians expelled in 1755 swelled the number of settlers, and in
1763 the island finally came into British possession, when the popu-
lation somewhat exceeded four thousand souls. There was a fair
growth of wheat, and the settlers then possessed about ten thousand
horned cattle. When the British troops, under Lord Rollo, took
possession in 1 758, they found the French governor's house adorned
by the scalps of Nova Scotian colonists, and of British troops taken
as stragglers from Nova Scotian garrisons by the Micmac Indians,
and by some of the " peaceful and innocent " Acadians who, in the
disguise of savages, had shared in their raids. A fort for defence
was erected, and the island was attached to the government of
Nova Scotia, but was made a separate province in 1768. The
population had then been greatly reduced by emigration to that
part of the mainland which afterwards became New Brunswick.
Many of the settlers in the island were at first former officers of
the army and navy, dwelling on lands granted by the " Lords of
Trade and Plantations ". These persons mostly sold their estates,
and the land thus came into the hands of a few proprietors, chiefly
absentees. A governor was appointed in 1770, and a first parlia-
ment was held at Charlottetown, the capital, three years later.
The representative assembly had eighteen members, and there
was the usual executive and legislative council.
The new colony had its external and internal troubles. In
1775 the little capital was plundered by two American cruisers,
and several officials were carried off, but were soon restored, with
the other booty, by Washington. There were difficulties concern-
ing the non-payment of quit-rents for lands, on which the govern-
ment chiefly relied for revenue, and many estates were sold, in a
time of war and of consequent uncertainty for the investment
of capital, at almost nominal prices. Forfeited lands, to a large
acreage, came into the possession of the governor and his friends,
but these were restored, by the home-government, to former
owners on the payment of expenses. The governor, Captain
Patterson, then defied the colonial authorities in London, twice
302 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
dissolved the popular assembly, and, in 1786, with a House packed
by his supporters, he confirmed the forced sales which had been
disallowed. He was promptly recalled, but maintained his ground
for six months, with ignoble persistence, against his successor,
Colonel Fanning. A peremptory order from home then withdrew
him into obscurity, and the land question was finally set at rest by
the return of the estates to the original proprietors. The colony
grew but slowly In numbers, and the only other noteworthy
circumstance in the eighteenth century is the change of name from
Island of St. John to Prince Edward Island, in compliment to the
Duke of Kent, whose life at Halifax was noticed above.
CHAPTER IX.
HUDSON'S BAY AND THE GREAT NORTH-WEST.
Early history of Hudson's Bay territory — The Hudson's Bay Company — Rupert's Land —
Troubles with the French traders — Claims by France to the territory — Assigned to
Britain at the Peace of Versailles — Exploration of the Great North-western regions
— The Verendryes — Their important discoveries — Sir Alexander Mackenzie — He
crosses the Rocky Mountains and reaches the Pacific Ocean.
"Hudson's Bay Territory" was the former name of a vast,
vague region lying north and north-west of Canada proper, and
now, under various titles, included in the Dominion of Canada.
The English have the plainest claim to priority of discovery and
settlement in that part of North America. The great inland sea,
Hudson's Bay, has its name from the distinguished navigator,
Henry Hudson, who first sailed on its waters in 1610, and took
possession of the bay and straits by authority of James the First.
Two years later, Sir Thomas Button erected a cross at the mouth
of a river entering the Bay on the west, and, claiming the region
for England, called the place Port Nelson, after the commander of
his ship. In 1631, Captain Luke Fox, exploring under orders
from Charles the First, visited Hudson's Bay, and restored the
cross at Port Nelson, which he found to have been defaced and
mutilated, either by the action of the weather or by the hands of
natives. In 1667, Captain Zachariah (or Zachary) Gilham (or
Gillam) entered the Bay, and erected Fort Charles at the mouth
HUDSON'S BAY AND THE GREAT NORTH-WEST. 303
of a river named by him after Prince Rupert, cousin of the English
sovereign: the modern names of these are Fort Rupert and River
Nemiskau. Gillam appears to have done some trade in furs with
the natives, and from this source came the famous " Hudson's Bay
Company". Prince Rupert and his friends subscribed a capital of
,£10,500, and obtained a charter from Charles the Second, incor-
porating them as the " Governor and Company of Merchant
Adventurers trading to Hudson Bay". The associates hereby
received the grant of an undefined territory " from Lake Superior
westwards ", with exclusive rights of trade. This vast region,
named " Rupert's Land", appears to have been taken to include
all the lands discovered, or to be discovered, within the entrance of
Hudson Strait, or, as otherwise explained, all territory whose
waters drained into the Bay or Strait. The commercial object
was mainly that of importing into Great Britain furs and skins
obtained from the Indians by barter, and the erection of armed
posts, for the protection of the European traders, shortly followed.
Fort Rupert was erected on the east side of the Bay; Fort Hayes
on the west coast, at the entrance of Moose River; and Fort
Albany at some distance to the north, at the mouth of Albany
River.
The Company's agents and servants were soon involved in
trouble with French traders who claimed the same region under a
grant made long before, by Louis the Thirteenth, to the "Company
of New France". In 1680, Captain Draper was sent to the
Nelson River for the purpose of starting a trade in furs, but, two
years later, two French vessels drove away the Company's ship,
and ended their project of establishing a "factory" at Port Nelson.
After other aggressive acts, a French force from Montreal, com-
manded by De Troyes and D'Iberville, captured in the summer
of 1686 all the British trading posts and forts on the shores of the
Bay. This conduct appears to have been dictated by a policy
wider and deeper than a mere desire to obtain commercial advan-
tages. The French seem to have held that their position in
Canada was endangered by a British hold on Hudson's Bay to the
north of their dominion, at the same time that Massachusetts was
encroaching on Acadia to the east, and New York, on the south,
was claiming possession of the southern shore of Lake Ontario.
The two countries in Europe were at peace, but this fact was
304 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
regarded by the assailants as simply affording them an opportunity
for surprise. Fort Hayes was taken on the evening of June iQth,
while its four eight-pounder guns were unloaded, and after its
garrison of fifteen men had resisted for two hours, in their block-
house of logs, the fire of nearly six times their number. A few
days later, a British vessel moored in front of Fort Rupert was
boarded and seized while nearly all the crew were asleep below,
and the fort itself, with its feeble garrison, of whom five out of
fifteen were killed or disabled, was soon in French hands. In the
last days of August, the invaders arrived with an armed vessel in
front of Fort Albany, containing a garrison of thirty men. No
defence was possible against a great superiority in cannon and
troops, and the French, for more than twenty years, became virtual
masters on most of Hudson's Bay.
The French king, Louis the Fourteenth, having long enjoyed
the subservience of England under Charles the Second, had rightly
judged that no retaliation need be feared from his brother and
successor, James. The seizure of territory on Hudson's Bay had
been made by France but three months before a treaty of neutrality
and amity was signed in London, providing that "the domain each
power held in America should be maintained in its full extent".
The "domain" of France now included the Hudson's Bay
territory, and, a few days after the treaty was concluded, the
released British prisoners of Forts Hayes, Rupert, and Albany
brought the news to London. The tidings was received with
great indignation. The Company was now an important body,
distinguished by its loyalty to the Crown, and a petition was at
once presented to James, bearing amongst other signatures that
of " Governor Churchill ", the man who was to become the first
Duke of Marlborough. The document referred to the " Piraticall
manner" in which the French had "taken and totally despoiled
the Petitioners of three of their Forts and Factories, three of their
ships, Fifty Thousand Beaver Skinns, and a great quantity of
Provisions, Stores and Merchandizes laid in for many Yeares
Trade". The king was placed in an awkward position. He
depended on Louis for support in his schemes of ruling England
independently of parliaments, and of establishing the Roman
Catholic religion. On the other hand, it was most desirable not
to offend, by neglect of just complaints, the powerful mercantile
HUDSON'S BAY AND THE GREAT NORTH-WEST. 305
interest of the city of London. Cromwell would have at once
demanded justice and reparation in a tone that would have brought
speedy satisfaction for those who had been wronged. What James
the Second did was to submit the case to a conference of five
commissioners, including the artful and heartless Sunderland, the
Scottish Earl of Middleton, and Sydney, Earl of Godolphin, on
the English side, with the French ambassador Barillon and his
colleague Bonrepaux, acting for the French. It was not till
December, 1687, that a report was made, with the result of leaving
the French in possession of Hudson's Bay. A year later, James
the Second was a dethroned exile.
The accession of William the Third brought war with France,
and for some years affairs in Europe prevented any active assertion
of British rights in the disputed region of North America. In
1693 an expedition recovered the three forts, but at the close of
1695 they were again in French possession, along with Fort York,
a strong work of recent erection. In 1696, two British men-of-war
regained possession of every post on the Bay, but the holders were
not long left undisturbed. I n the next year, a strong naval force
arrived from France, and joined at Newfoundland the brave and
able D'Iberville, who had been sent out by De Frontenac, the
governor of Canada, for the uprooting of British settlements in
every quarter. In July he started for Hudson's Bay with four
men-of-war, but one of the vessels was crushed in the ice, and, as
the rest were detached by the weather, the French commander,
early in September, found himself near Fort York with only his
own 5O-gun ship, Le Pelican. Three British vessels soon appeared
in the offing, and D'Iberville boldly advanced to the attack. One
of the ships was the Hampshire, of fifty guns: it is now unknown
whether her consorts were men-of-war or armed merchantmen.
In any case, the Hampshire speedily sank. As the French state,
she was ruined by a single broadside, an effect which every naval
man knows to be impossible for the guns of that period to produce
on a vessel of her size and scantling. The sea was very rough,
and it is most likely that the Hampshire succumbed by capsizing
through a sudden squall. No boat could be lowered, and every
man on board went down. One of the other British ships
surrendered, and the other escaped to tell the tale. Two days
later, the Pelican and her prize were driven ashore, with some loss
VOL. I. 20
306 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
of life among the crews, but the arrival of the other ships of the
French squadron decided the possession of Fort York. After
three days' bombardment, the place was given up with the honours
of war.
The Treaty of Ryswick, signed in September, 1697, kft Fort
Albany alone in British possession, but the Treaty of Utrecht, in
1713, again made the Hudson Bay Company masters of the whole
coast, and the French flag disappeared from those waters until the
war which ended in 1783. In 1782, some French ships under the
famous and ill-fated La Pe>ouse, whom we saw in the Pacific at
Botany Bay, captured Forts York and Churchill, to be shortly
restored at the Peace of Versailles. The Company, at this date,
had increased their capital and extended their operations by the
erection of many new stations for the trade in furs. The explora-
tions to the north-west will be shortly dealt with, and we may here
refer to the formidable opposition started in 1783 by the North-
west Fur Company established at Montreal. This energetic body,
in its commercial warfare with the old monopoly, aroused feeling
which was vented in contests between traders, servants, and agents
on both sides, not without loss of property and life.
The vast region of lakes, rivers, and woods, long sacred to the
beaver, buffalo, moose, wolf, bear, and other creatures hunted as
beasts of prey or as objects of value for skin and fur, was by
degrees opened up in the adventurous and arduous toils of both
British and French explorers. Trappers, voyageurs, and coureurs
de bois, scurrying on snow-shoes in the wintry woods, or paddling
along the numberless streams and lakes in the light canoes which
could be carried on the back over the portages connecting the
different waters, made their way, greatly daring in the greed for
gain, from point to point of the huge domain. The hardiest men
of both sides of the Atlantic were engaged in the work of
gathering, trading in, and storing furs. The Hebrides and
Orkneys sent forth their sons, and Frenchmen of Canada, Indians
of divers tribes, half-breeds, and adventurers from every clime,
•were to be found at the widely-scattered posts of the Company.
By a regular tariff of barter, the skins of the beaver, the marten,
the musk-rat, and the valuable silver-fox were obtained from the
natives who trapped them or hunted them down.
The great names in the exploration of the north-western
HUDSON'S BAY AND THE GREAT NORTH-WEST. 307
regions are those of the French Les Verendryes, father and sons,
and of the Scottish trader and traveller, Sir Alexander Mackenzie.
The elder La Verendrye, a man of nearly fifty years, was in 1728
in command, under De Beauharnois, as Governor of Canada, at
Fort Nepigon, on Lake Superior. He had heard from the
Indians of great lakes to the north, and he applied to Beauharnois
for permission and help to establish French influence on the inland
waters afterwards known as Lake of the Woods and Lake Winni-
peg. His avowed object was to secure the territory beforehand
against the English, who had not yet passed far inland from the
shores of Hudson's Bay. In June, 1732, with non-official counten-
ance from his friend, the governor, and in connection with a
company of Montreal merchants, the explorer started with two of
his sons, his nephew, some Indians, and a Jesuit missionary,
Father Messaiger. By canoe-route and portage, along Rainy
Lake and River, the travellers reached the inland sea called by
their leader Lac des Bois, on the west shore of which they erected
Fort St. Charles. After wintering there, the explorer was delayed
by want of funds for needful supplies, and in 1734 he returned to
Montreal, after sending forward his eldest son to construct Fort
Maurepas at the point where the river Winnipeg enters the lake
of that name.
Between June, 1735, and the spring of 1743, with various
adventures and mishaps, La Verendrye and his sons made many
important geographical discoveries. In 1736, the eldest son, a
missionary named Pere Auneau, and a party of men, were attacked
and all massacred by Sioux Indians. In 1738, the elder La
Verendrye entered the Red River by canoe from Lake Winnipeg,
and thence, by the Assiniboine and by portage, he arrived at Lake
Manitoba, but was soon forced to make a long halt by severe
illness. In the course of 1739, a younger son of the French
traveller passed up Lake Winnipegosis and pressed on by land
towards the Saskatchewan. In 1740, the father returned to
Canada, and was received with distinction at Quebec by the
governor. In the autumn of the following year he was again at
Fort St. Charles, whence he reached Fort de la Reine, on the
Assiniboine, and thence dispatched one of his sons to the upper
part of Lake Winnipeg, where the river Saskatchewan discharges
its waters. In the course of 1742, the Chevalier de la Verendrye
308 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
and one of his brothers reached the upper waters of the Missouri
and Yellowstone rivers, but there is no good evidence to show that
they ever arrived, as has been asserted by modern writers, at the
foot of, or even within sight of, the Rocky Mountains. The
geographical achievements of the La Verendrye family are notable
enough when they include, as we have shown, the exploration, if
not the first discovery, of Lakes Winnipeg and Manitoba, of the
rivers Assiniboine and Saskatchewan, and of a vast extent of
country many hundreds of miles west and north of Lake Superior.
For British explorers, a free course was opened, so far as
French opposition was concerned, by the sequel of Wolfe's exploit
in 1759. Ten years after that date, Samuel Hearne started from
Prince of Wales Fort, on Hudson's Bay, for the north and west.
He was a servant of the Company, despatched by them for the
discovery of copper mines. In the course of four years' travel,
ending in 1772, Hearne reached the Great Slave Lake, called by
him " Lake Athapuscon ", and, making his way to the Arctic
Ocean, there discovered the mouth of the Copper-mine river, and
proved the existence of the straits to the north of the American
continent. Alexander Mackenzie, a native of the Highlands, went
out to Canada to enter the service of the North-west Fur Com-
pany. He was a born explorer, endued with an inquiring mind
and an adventurous spirit, with a healthy and very hardy frame.
His eager desire was to make a new route across the great conti-
nent to the western ocean. During the earlier years of his sojourn
in the wilds, he was engaged on and around Lake Superior, and
his qualities rapidly gained him a leadership among the boldest
souls of his comrades. The dangers and discomforts of the waters
and the woods, from the fierce and cunning native, from heat and
cold, from hunger and thirst, were to Mackenzie matters of enjoy-
ment and ease. A ruler of men, he was successful in swaying the
spirits of his followers, in subduing their fears, appeasing their dis-
contents, and stirring faint hearts and weary bodies to new hopes
and efforts towards the goal. Such was the man that in 1 789 left
'Fort Chepewyan, a fur-traders' post on the south side of the Lake
of the Hills, now called Lake Athabasca. On June 3rd, he started
in a birch-bark canoe, and, following the Slave River into the
Great Slave Lake, went northwards by the river that bears his
name until, in the latest days of July, he reached the point where
HUDSON'S BAY AND THE GREAT NORTH-WEST. 309
its waters enter the Polar Sea. On September i2th he was back
at the fort with the four canoes that made the expedition, after a
journey of more than two thousand miles.
The determined and practical character of this great traveller
was now made manifest in another line. From lack of scientific
lore, he had failed, in his journey towards the Arctic Ocean, to
know his exact position on the globe. He started for London,
and there remained until he had gained the requisite mathematical
knowledge, and then returned to Canada eager for fresh geo-
graphical fame. In the autumn of 1792, we find Mackenzie again
at Fort Chepewyan, now with his face and his purpose turned
towards the west. On October loth, he began the new journey,
and passing down the Elk into the Peace River, he wintered at a
place called Deer Mountain from November ist till May 9th,
1793. His party was composed of seven picked men, including
two French voyageitrs of the former expedition, besides two
Indians. One of the party, Fra^ois Beaulieu, died nearly eighty
years afterwards, in 1872, at the age of nearly a hundred. The
Rocky Mountains, with their summits covered with snow, came in
view to the south-west on May 1 7th, and, after great difficulty and
toil in crossing the range, the Pacific Ocean was reached near the
mouth of what is now called Simpson's River, in British Columbia.
This issue of the labours of Mackenzie and his men was attained
on July 22nd, as recorded by themselves on a rock by the shore in
huge letters of vermilion mixed with melted grease. On August
24th the hardy and daring travellers were again at their starting-
point in Peace River. Mackenzie had thus surpassed all previous
travellers in North America by reaching both the Arctic and
Pacific Oceans along routes which had before been wholly
unknown to white men.
3IO OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
CHAPTER X.
COLONIAL POSSESSIONS IN THE WEST INDIES.
Geographical division and history of the islands— Barbados — Its flourishing condition in
early times — Introduction of negro labour into the island — Enterprising spirit of the
Barbadians — The Bermudas or Somers' Islands — Leeward Islands — St. Kitts— Nevis
— Antigua — Montserrat — Dominica — Virgin Islands —Windward Islands — Tobago —
St. Lucia — Grenada and the Grenadines — St. Vincent — The Bahamas — British
Honduras or Belize — Trinidad — Jamaica.
The groups of islands called the West Indies were first
discovered, as all the world knows, by the Spaniards under the
leadership of the Genoese navigator, Christopher Columbus. The
title bestowed by the great mariner bears witness, of course, to his
belief that he had, when he landed in the Bahamas, reached a
portion of the Indian territory in Asia. Geological investigation
makes it probable that, in early ages, the great archipelago which
sweeps in a grand curve from North to South America, inclosing
the waters of the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea, was
continuous land with the two great masses. In the year after
their discovery, the West Indies received the existing name of
Antilles, applied to the whole of the islands save the Bahamas.
The name was given by the historian, Peter Martyr d'Anghera, a
native of Italy who was well received at the court of Ferdinand
and Isabella, and became in due time Bishop of Jamaica. His
work entitled De Orbe Novo, published in 1516, contained the first
account of the discovery, or re-discovery, of America, and the word
"Antilles" has reference to a supposed island, or submerged
continent, in those regions, marked on very early charts as
Antiglia. The Greater Antilles are Cuba, Jamaica, Hayti, and
Porto Rico, the other islands being known as the Lesser Antilles.
The northern isles of the Lesser Antilles, including Antigua, are
called the Leeward Islands, from their lying, for the most part,
more to the west, and thus farther from the source of the north-
east trade, the prevailing wind of the West Indies. The native or
aboriginal population of the islands consisted of a race of American
Indians named Caribs, long since exterminated, or expelled from
those shores, with few exceptions, to the neighbouring coasts of
the mainland of Central and South America.
At an early date, the lack of labour for the production of sugar,
COLONIAL POSSESSIONS IN THE WEST INDIES. 311
tobacco, and other special growths of the West Indies caused the
importation of the negro-slaves whose descendants still form so
large a part of the population. The tropical climate and the
fertility of soil were, from the first, attractive to Spaniards as
natives of the warm region of southern Europe and as the pos-
sessors of dominion on this side of the Atlantic at a time when
monopoly and aggrandisement were becoming, in the new states-
system of Europe, the supreme objects of desire and effort. The
rapid rise of Spain to predominance in Europe was followed by as
swift and remarkable a decline to inferior rank, and after less than
a century of her supremacy among the nations, the English,
French, and Dutch, in our Stuart age, began to appear as settlers
in the sunny islands fringing the east of the great inter-continental
sea. The history will show that the struggle for possession of
the Lesser Antilles was at last mainly one between the chief
European rivals and maritime powers, Great Britain and France.
In the vast development of our colonial empire during the
nineteenth century the importance and interest of the West Indian
Isles have in a great degree declined, but their history has its
phases of sentiment and romance, as well as its serious and stirring
records of combat and of commerce, of lengthy and hot debate in
parliament at home, succeeded by legislation most momentous for
all who were concerned. West India sugar is a phrase that, at the
close of the eighteenth century, was of the highest commercial and
political import in the cities of London and Bristol. Havana cigars,
the most valuable product of the " Queen of the Antilles", have
ever been the highest form of the " noxious " weed denounced by
James the First. Jamaica rum cannot be named without raising
the view of British tars, bare to the waist, and begrimed with the
smoke of exploded powder, working between decks, with dire effect
upon French, Dutch, or Spanish foes, the shotted guns of the
towering ship in line of battle, or the lively frigate in chase or
duel. The negro slave combines, as a subject of thought and
discourse, the opposite elements of tragedy and comedy, of the
deepest feeling and the broadest fun. The freeing of the negro in
the West Indian Isles under British sway was a grand national
act of repentance and reparation for a wrong which, to our shame,
had its origin with the commercial greed of an Englishman in the
Elizabethan age.
312 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
The heroes of our most adventurous time come before us in
the mention of the " Spanish Main ", or the Caribbean Sea and
its coasts, where the "sea-dogs" of Elizabeth harassed the foes
of their land and their faith, and showed in themselves a curious
mingling of patriot and pirate, as Puritans plundering for plunder's
sake, and yet doing all "in the name of the Lord". The seas of
that region, alive with sharks, have been reddened with the blood
of many a victim to the seaman's greatest foe in tropical climes.
West Indian waters had an evil name in the seventeenth and
early in the eighteenth century for the wretches who flew the black
flag at the main, and, themselves the offscouring of every people,
boarded and sacked the peaceful trade-ship, and made all her crew
" walk the plank " into the sea. The stories of the time are rife
with accounts of pirates' bodies hung in chains at Kingston and
other West Indian ports, of treasure buried in secret spots by
the captains of piratical craft, and of the " buccaneers " who, up to
the close of the seventeenth century, waged war against the
Spanish monopoly of trade. These renowned adventurers from
every European maritime people had their strongholds in the
Caribbean seas, first at Tortuga in 1630, and a generation later at
Jamaica, and formed a confederacy of men full of courage and
skill in their hazardous calling, of hatred for the Spaniard, and of
cruelty for those who resisted their will. The greatest of the
leaders of men in this wild and lawless career were the terrible
Frenchmen, Montbars and Peter of Dieppe, and the Welshman,
Henry Morgan, a man of distinguished valour and ability, who
was knighted by Charles the Second, and became deputy-governor
of Jamaica. The worst of the buccaneers, and the degenerate
successors of the more chivalrous and gallant of the number, were
the men that, as mere pirates, were hated and hunted down by all
honest mariners.
Barbados is, socially and historically, the most English of all
our West Indian colonies. From the date of its first occupation
by our settlers, early in the seventeenth century, the island has
never changed hands, and, bearing once the name "Little England",
it was, prior to the detrimental influence of the Navigation Act,
and the competition of Jamaica, one of the richest, most populous,
and most industrious regions in the world. The date of discovery
is unknown, but the name (derived from " Los Barbados ", banyans
COLONIAL POSSESSIONS IN THE WEST INDIES. 313
or "bearded" fig-trees) points to Portuguese navigators as the
first European visitors who noted that feature of its luxuriant
vegetation. It was in 1605 that the crew of the English ship
Olive touched there, and took nominal possession by carving on a
tree the words " James, King of England, and of this island ".
The place was almost devoid of native inhabitants, a fact attributed
to the ruthless cruelty of the Spanish in the West Indies.
In 1625 Sir William Courteen, a London merchant, sent out a
small party of settlers, who landed on the west coast and erected
some buildings, with defences, called by them James' Town.
Two years later Charles I. granted "all the Caribbee Isles" to
the Earl of Carlisle, who appointed a governor, and turned his
new possession to profitable use by the sale of some ten thousand
acres of land to London merchants. These men of capital and
enterprise lost no time, for in 1628 more than sixty settlers, under
their auspices, landed on the shore of Carlisle Bay, and founded
Bridgetown, the present capital, by the erection of timber-dwellings,
and the construction of a bridge spanning the river which crossed
the ground. The fertile soil was soon producing cotton, indigo,
and tobacco, with the sugar-cane (a native of southern Asia) as a
plant from which those earlier Barbadians merely brewed a rude
form of rum. The prosperity of the island began when a Dutch-
man, arriving from Brazil, brought to the planters the process of
boiling down the juice of the canes when they were fully ripe.
The making of sugar was soon the staple industry, creating great
and rapid wealth, and establishing in full force the labour of negro-
slaves.
It was in 1645 that the blacks from Africa were introduced.
The heat of the climate was such as to unfit Europeans for field-
work, and the negro was stronger, in a muscular sense, than the
native race of the West Indies. It has been urged that the first
motive for the employment of negroes was the humane purpose of
saving the weak from toil under tropical suns, but the history of
England in the seventeenth and earlier part of the eighteenth
centuries informs us that large numbers of whites, guilty of political,
religious, or social offence to the ruling powers, were dispatched
from the British Isles to forced labour in the "plantations". It
must be remembered that this term includes the colonies in North
America, where the climate was well suited to the labour of
314 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Europeans; but in the middle of the seventeenth century, under
the " Cromwellian Settlement" in Ireland, we find thousands of
women, girls, and boys sent out as slaves to Jamaica and Barbados,
and the Bristol merchants had regular agents who treated with the
Irish government for slaves to work in the sugar-fields. A brisk
trade in sugar was soon being carried on with Bristol, and large
supplies of English goods were sent out thence and from the port
of London. Within twenty years from the introduction of the
sugar manufacture the island, no larger than the Isle of Wight,
contained 50,000 people, and the planters were making enormous
fortunes.
At an early date in the history of Barbados, the English settlers
found themselves living under the political conditions which pre-
vailed at home. In 1645 the island was already divided into n
parishes, each sending two representatives to a General Assembly.
The Civil War then raging in Great Britain promoted the pros-
perity of our then chief West Indian possession by the emigration
of many Royalists of ample means, who also gave a decided tone
to the politics of the Barbadian planters. In 1649, when the Com-
monwealth was proclaimed in England, Lord Willoughby, the
governor, declared his unchanged allegiance to monarchy, as
represented by the young king, Charles II. The notice taken of
this attitude by the republican rulers of the British Isles proves
the importance of the position held by Barbados. Sir George
Ayscue (or Ayscough) was sent out in 1651 with a force that took
possession of the island, and the Commonwealth officer banished
Lord Willoughby, when he persisted in refusal to recognize the
new government at home. No harm ensued to the people or their
property, and a charter of 1652 confirmed their constitutional
system of rule, including the right of self-taxation. Ten years
later, as a consequence of the Restoration, Willoughby returned,
not only as governor, but as proprietor of the island, under con-
veyance from Lord Carlisle, son of the first grantee. Certain
claims on the settlers were then made by the heirs of the Carlisles,
and, to the great discontent of the people, a duty of 4^ per cent
on all exports was imposed. In 1663 Charles II. caused the
dissolution of proprietary rule, and assumed sovereign rights over
Barbados, with a regular revenue for himself and his heirs, amount-
ing in 1684 to about ^7000 per annum. The export duties, in
COLONIAL POSSESSIONS IN THE WEST INDIES. $15
spite of all remonstrances, continued to be paid until the beginning
of Victoria's reign.
The general history of the island, apart from the rivalry of
Jamaica in sugar and rum, and until the commercially disastrous
abolition of slavery in the nineteenth century, has been one of
almost uneventful, unchecked, and uniform prosperity. A census
taken in 1684 showed a white population of 20,000, with more
than double that number of negroes. The Barbadians from time
to time displayed an enterprising spirit which could not rest satisfied
with the limits of their own territory. Soon after the Restoration
some of the planters went in arms, and expelled the French for a
time from the island of St. Lucia. In 1665 we see them founding
a new settlement in Carolina. In 1690 General Codrington, with
a force from Barbados, drove out the French from the island of St.
Kitts. The same gentleman, a native of the island, showed a truly
patriotic and philanthropic spirit in bequeathing his two estates of
land, sugar-works, negroes, and cattle to the Society for the Pro-
pagation of the Gospel, for the foundation of a college. The pro-
perty thus left in 1710 was afterwards turned to most profitable
use in the education of clergymen for service in the West Indies.
Among the incidents of Barbadian history prior to the present
century we may note that in 1778, when Great Britain was at war
with France, and with the revolted colonies of North America, the
people of the island, from loss of trade and the interruption of
communication, were severely distressed, and received a grant in
relief from parliament. The victory of Rodney over the Count de
Grasse in 1782 saved Barbados, along with Jamaica and other
West India Islands, from capture by the French. In that same
year the ravages wrought by a fearful hurricane were such as to
need, in partial relief, the grant of ,£80,000 from the House of
Commons. The Bermudas or Somers Islands, not strictly of the
"West Indies", are almost as old a British possession as Barbados,
and in date of settlement rank before that island. The first and
official name is taken from that of the Spanish navigator Juan
Bermudes, who first sighted them in 1515. The second title is
derived from Sir George Somers, a native of Lyme Regis. His
ship, the Sea Venture, which also bore Sir Thomas Gates, was
wrecked on an island of the group in 1609, as she sailed for Virginia,
then lately colonized from England. The stormy waters of that
316 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
region of the North Atlantic, if not the actual incident of the wreck,
caused the well-known allusion in Shakespeare's Tempest (Act i.
scene 2) to the "still-vex'd (i.e. constantly tormented) Bermoothes".
The play was first produced in 161 1, and we find similar references
in other writers of the time. Thus Webster, in the Duchess of Malfi
(Act iii. scene 2), makes one of his characters declare that he "would
sooner swim to the Bermootha's on Two politicians' rotten bladders",
and Fletcher, in Women Pleased (h&\. i. scene 2), writes of "purchas-
ing that egg-shell, To victual out a witch for the Burmoothes".
From Stow's Annals we learn that the islands had an evil name
as being " said and supposed to bee inchanted and inhabited with
witches, and deuills, which grew by reason of accustomed monstrous
Thunder, storme, and tempest, neere vnto those Hands, also for
that the whole 'coast is so wonderous dangerous, of Rockes, that
few can approach them, but with vnspeakable hazard of shipwrack".
We shall see hereafter that the "dreadful coast of the Bermodes",
as Stow calls it in the same passage, has not deterred modern visitors.
Sir George was, at the time of his mishap, the admiral of a fleet
sent out by the South Virginia Company of London. The other
eight vessels reached their destination, while Somers took posses-
sion of the group in the name of James I., and in the following
year the shipwrecked persons built a small vessel, and made their
way to the Virginian settlement at James Town. The islands were
yet destined to prove fatal to Somers. He found the Virginian
colonists suffering from lack of food, and in search thereof he made
a voyage to the islands where the sunken reef on which his ship
had been driven still bears the name of Sea Venture Flat. There
were herds of wild pigs descended from animals put ashore by
some previous voyagers, and in November, 1611, we find that he
"dyed of a surfeit in eating of a pig". The evil reputation of the
group which had been libelled by the writers of the age vanished
at the touch of personal experience, and Captain Matthew Somers,
nephew of the admiral, conveyed to England a faithful and fair
report concerning the picturesque, healthful, and to some extent
•fertile islands. The Virginia Company, under an extension of
their charter granted by the Crown, annexed the group to their
territory on the mainland, and soon disposed of their new posses-
sion to another body of " adventurers " or speculators, entitled
" The Company of the City of London for the Plantation of the
COLONIAL POSSESSIONS IN THE WEST INDIES. 317
Somers' Islands ". For many years the islands bore the name
thus attached, until the justice of history recognized the claim of
the first discoverer. The soil was found suitable for the growth
o
of tobacco, and as early as the year 1621, James I., no lover of
"the weed", and a monarch desirous to avoid offence to Spain in
her Cuba trade, issued a proclamation limiting the export from
Virginia and the Bermudas. It may be of interest to mention, in
this age of smokers, that the herb was introduced into England
about 1585, and that the taste for it grew so rapidly that tobacco
shops in London soon became as common as taverns. In 1620
the value of the annual imports was estimated at ,£120,000, and
the royal proclamation concerning Virginia and the Bermudas
named nearly half that sum as the limit for value exported from
these new British colonies. The product became a good source
of revenue in the heavy duty which was imposed, and was soon
appropriated as a Crown monopoly. A representative form of
government was established before the end of James I.'s reign,
but the charter of the company in London was annulled in 1684,
and governors were henceforth appointed by the Crown.
The inhabitants of the Bermudas rank amongst those happy
communities who have little or no history. Devoted to the tillage
of the soil and to peaceful trade, they knew naught by experience
of the horrors of war. They were largely engaged in maritime
pursuits, for which they built, from the cedar of their islands, many
small vessels up to 300 tons burden, sailing to the West Indies,
Demerara, the United States, and the British colonies in North
America. At a later period a carrying trade arose in salt fish from
Newfoundland for the church fasts of Italy and Portugal, with
return cargoes of the port wine well suited for consumption by the
dwellers in that bleak and foggy region. The more enterprising
traders would sail to Ascension or Madeira, and there trans-ship,
from the stately vessels of the Indian fleet, the teas of China, the
silks and drugs of India, and other Eastern produce for sale in the
ports on the American coast. Not wholly exempt from the tro-
pical storms which superstition laid to the charge of " witches and
devils ", the islands were, in October, 1 780, ravaged by a fearful
hurricane. The close of the eighteenth century, a time of war with
France and Spain, gave Bermuda a new value as a naval station,
defended by the dangerous reefs that surround the shores, and by
318 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
the intricate channel which requires, for access to land, most skilful
and careful pilotage.
Of the group known as the Leeward Islands, Dominica, Mont-
serrat, St. Kitts, Antigua, and some of the Virgin Isles, were
discovered in 1493 by Columbus. The British possession of
nearly all the islands now held by us in this part of the archipelago
dates from the seventeenth century, and, apart from Dominica,
they have been from the time of settlement under a common form
of rule. The grant of "all the Caribee Isles" to the Earl of
Carlisle by Charles I., as delivered above with respect to Barbados,
included the islands now under review, and under William and
Mary the colonists were provided with a legislature which passed
measures that are still, in some instances, in beneficial action. One
statute, dealing with methods of settling estate in land, showed the
wisdom of the colonial debaters in effecting a reform which the
home country did not obtain until nearly the beginning of Victoria's
reign. One of the last Acts of the General Assembly before its
virtual extinction in 1 798 was a statute which greatly bettered the
condition of the slaves. The enlightenment as well as the humanity
of the Leeward Islands' legislators was displayed in the same year
by measures for freedom of trade and for Catholic emancipation
from political disabilities. Neither of these Acts was allowed by
the home government, still lagging far in the rear of its subjects in
the West Indies.
To St. Kitts, as the centre to which the rest owed their colon-
ization, the place of honour is due in the ensuing record. St. Kitts,
thus commonly named for " St. Christopher", was called by the
natives " the fertile island ", and received its designation from
Columbus probably in honour of his patron saint. He found there
a dense population of Caribs, who long remained possessors of
their homes and lands. The history of the island, after the first
establishment of Europeans, was chequered by conflicts between
the English and French. The first attempt at European settle-
ment was made in 1623 by Mr. Thomas Warner, but his first crops
'were ruined by a violent storm, and he then applied for help from
the patentee, the Earl of Carlisle. The appointment of Warner as
" King's Lieutenant" over St. Kitts, Nevis, Barbados, and Mont-
serrat sent him back to the island in 1625 as the founder of a
permanent colony. On the day of his landing a small body of
COLONIAL POSSESSIONS IN THE WEST INDIES. 319
Frenchmen also came ashore, and the European rivals found it
well to combine against the common and more numerous foe, the
Caribs. In May, 1627, a league was made, by the terms of which
the English took the central part, while the French settled down
at the two ends of the island. Two years later, a Spanish attack
wrought much damage to the new-comers, but a stream of West
Indian emigration set in from Europe, and French and English
colonists rapidly spread to the neighbouring islands. In a few
years' time the terms of the league were broken through jealousies
which led to violence and bloodshed, and the outbreak of war
between the nations in Europe led to the surrender of the English
at St. Kitts in 1666. The Treaty of Breda, in the following year,
restored the English settlers to the possession of their lands, and
for more than twenty years the two parties lived at peace.
The accession of William III. to the British throne in 1689,
and the subsequent outbreak of war with France, brought new
trouble to the English settlers. The French planters were in
greater force, and our people were forced to flee or perish. In
1690 General Codrington came to the rescue from Barbados, and,
with a powerful body of militia at his command, drove out the
French, deporting nearly a thousand to other islands, and taking
sole possession for his countrymen. The Treaty of Ryswick in
1697 restored the French to their former share of St. Christopher's,
but in 1702, when the War of the Spanish Succession began, they
were ousted again by their English foes, and the Treaty of Utrecht
in 1713 gave the island wholly into English hands. In the great
European war which arose when France embraced the cause of
our revolted colonies in North America, the British navy was
for a time overmatched by the united maritime forces of France,
Holland, and Spain, and St. Kitts again fell for a time into French
possession, but was recovered after Rodney's grand achievement
against the Comte de Grasse in the spring of 1782.
Nevis, noted for its hurricanes and earthquakes, which have
wrought at times great destruction of property and life, had an
evil name in the slavery days, as one of the chief West Indian
markets for the sale of " black ivory". It was named by Columbus
from a snow-capped mountain near Barcelona. Its first settlers
came from Thomas Warner's party of colonists at St. Kitts in
1628, and apart from two French invasions, at times of European
320 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
war between the rival nations, the island has remained uncontested
in British hands. About the beginning of the eighteenth century
Nevis was maintaining a population of 20,000, or above half as
many more than its actual inhabitants.
Antigua, on its discovery by Columbus, was named by him
after Santa Maria la Antigua, an old church in Seville. A few
Caribs, of warlike and cannibal tastes, were the sole population,
and the island, which is poorly supplied with water, was left un-
noticed by Europeans for nearly a century and a half. The grant
to Lord Carlisle in 1627 led to the arrival of a few English settlers,
five years later, from St. Kitts. In 1663 Charles II. bestowed the
island by patent on Lord Willoughby, who sent out a large number
of colonists. They soon suffered much from French interference.
An expedition from Martinique took possession early in 1667, but
the Treaty of Breda restored it in the same year to British occu-
pation, in which it has ever since remained, amid all the changes
that occurred to neighbouring islands during our lengthy maritime
contests with France and Spain. The trade, from time to time, was
exposed to the attacks of pirates and privateers, and the planters
may have suffered loss from occasional raids. The rich soil soon
produced wealth in sugar, with its extracts, molasses and rum, and
the history of the island has been mainly one of uneventful pro-
sperity, chequered by the damage due to hurricanes and earthquakes,
of which this island has had her full share. In 1706 an insurrection,
caused by the tyrannical conduct of the governor, Colonel Parke,
ended in his violent death, but the home government granted a
full pardon to all who were engaged in the outbreak.
Montserrat, the gem of the Lesser Antilles for salubrity of
climate and beauty of scenery, was named by Columbus " Mon-
serrado", from the saw-like outline of its pinnacles. In these he
saw a resemblance to the Catalonian mountain of that name, on
which stands the famous Benedictine abbey where Ignatius Loyola
was living when he planned the institution of the Society of Jesus.
Colonized by the English from St. Kitts in 1632, it was captured
in 1664 by the French, who laid heavy imposts on the British
settlers; four years later, under the Treaty of Breda, it was left in
our hands, in which it has since remained, save for an occupation
by the French for two years prior to the Treaty of Versailles
concluded in 1783. In 1668 the people, by royal charter, received
COLONIAL POSSESSIONS IN THE WEST INDIES. 321
a legislative council and assembly, which bodies, with various
changes of form and system, directed local affairs down to a recent
date.
The name of Dominica was assigned by its great discoverer from
the fact of his arrival on its shores on Sunday (Dies Dominica, in
the Latin calendar), November 3rd, 1493, while he was sailing
between Martinique and Guadeloupe. The island was included in
the grant made by Charles I. to Lord Carlisle, but it was long left
without colonists, and several attempts at occupation were thwarted
by the French in those waters. The Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle, in
1748, declared Dominica and some other islands to be neutral
ground for European nations, and left to the occupation of the
aboriginal Caribs. Within a few years, however, a number of
French planters were found in possession. An English attack in
1756 was successful, and our right by conquest was confirmed
seven years later under the Treaty of Paris. French jealousy was
aroused, and the Dominican landowners invited aid from their
countrymen at Martinique, though they had been left undisturbed
in 1763, on becoming subjects of the British crown, and undertak-
ing to pay a small quit-rent for their estates.
The hostility of feeling between the two nations in matters of
colonial possession and trade, both in the East and West Indies,
has been referred to in previous pages of this work. It was a
spirit which ever disregarded the existence of peace between the
Powers in Europe, and aimed only at aggrandisement on the scenes
of rivalry in other quarters of the world. It was therefore certain
that, on the outbreak of war in 1778, the French in the West
Indies would assail the British islands. A man of exceptional
ability and energy had become, in 1768, governor of the French
island of Guadeloupe, and afterwards commander-in-chief of all the
French forces in the West Indies. This was Frangois Claude
Amour, Marquis de Bouille, a fiery native of Auvergne, who had
done distinguished service in Germany during the Seven Years'
War, and was to become famous for courage and decision in his
command at Metz when the throne of Louis XVI. was tottering
to its fall. Carlyle alludes to his " swift, sharp operation on the
English Leeward Islands" at this epoch, and describes him as "a
quick, choleric, sharply discerning, stubbornly endeavouring man
. with valour, nay, headlong audacity . . . with military
VOL. I. 21
322 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
tiger-spring, clutching Nevis and Montserrat from the English".
Such was he who now made his presence strongly feh by the
British in the West Indies. A powerful naval and military expe-
dition was prepared at Martinique, and in September, 1778, after
a stout resistance, Dominica fell into the power of De Bouille\ A
harsh governor was appointed, and there was much distress among
the people from the utter failure of trade. Tobago, St. Kitts,
Nevis and other islands were also conquered, but Dominica, with
some others, was restored to Great Britain in the treaty of 1783.
Of the Virgin Islands, a group numbering about fifty, some
thirty-two belong to Great Britain, the chief of these being Tortola,
Virgin Gorda, and Anegada. The name, assigned by Columbus
in 1493, has reference to St. Ursula and her legendary pious
maidens of martyr memory at Cologne. Some islets of the archi-
pelago were first colonized in 1666 by British settlers from Anguilla,
who took the place of buccaneers that had infested the seas in that
part of the Antilles. The colonists, in 1773, were furnished with
a separate civil government and courts of law, and their history
has been throughout one of peace, obscurity, and honest toil,
resulting in no wealth beyond the comforts of a life devoted to
rude tillage, pasturage, and fishing.
Of the Windward group, Barbados has been already noticed,
and Trinidad, as also a separate colony, finds its own place else-
where. Tobago, St. Lucia, St. Vincent, Grenada, and the Grena-
dines present a record diversified by frequent interchanges of
possession during the West Indian conflicts of the two great
European rivals.
The island of Tobago, the name of which has been connected
with the free use of tobacco by its earliest known inhabitants, the
Caribs, was entitled "Assumption" by Columbus in 1498, when he
arrived there on his third voyage, ending in his discovery of the
mainland of South America. Some English mariners, in 1580,
found the place void of all dwellers, probably owing to Spanish
extermination of the natives, and planted there the flag of the great
•Tudor queen. In 1608 James I. formally claimed the sovereignty,
but some time elapsed before any attempt at settlement was made.
In the last year of his reign a party of Barbadians reached the
island, but they were unable to cope with the Caribs who had now
made it their abode, and only a few escaped to tell the tale of
COLONIAL POSSESSIONS IN THE WEST INDIES. 323
failure. In 1632 a Dutch company despatched some hundreds of
settlers from Zealand, who occupied the place as "New Walcheren".
The Spaniards and Caribs, in two years' time, came in force from
Trinidad, and expelled or slew all the European intruders. In 1641
Charles I. made a grant of Tobago to James, Duke of Courland,
a province on the south-east Baltic coast. The new possessor
thereupon dispatched a number of his own people as colonists, and
they were joined, in 1654, by a fresh body of Dutchmen, who at
first made a friendly division of the territory with the Courlanders.
The new-comers, however, with the greed of their race in that
age, were not content with a partial possession, and in 1658 rose
upon the Poles and drove them out. The early days of Tobago
were a time of singular unrest, for in 1662, when the Dutch
company resigned their claim, probably under threats from the
aggressive Louis XIV., that monarch created a certain Cornelius
Lampsis " Baron of Tobago", and made him proprietor under the
French crown. In 1664 Charles II., then hostile to the Dutch,
made a new grant of the much-contested territory to the Duke
of Courland, but the Hollanders disdained to recognize his title,
and, as English history disgracefully proves, our sovereign was
then in no condition to enforce his claims. The growing maritime
power of the French monarch, at war with Holland in 1677,
enabled him to intervene with effect, and his fleet, defeating a
Dutch squadron in those waters, caused the restoration of Tobago
to the Duke of Courland, only to be sold by him, in 1681, to a
London company of merchants. The island, by arrangement
between the three chief countries, Great Britain, France, and
Holland, was then declared to be neutral ground, where all
Europeans might live as colonists or carry on trade, but no nation
was to plant a garrison or attempt an exclusive tenure. At last,
in 1763, the Treaty of Paris formally ceded Tobago to Great
Britain. The "government of Grenada" was then established
under the Great Seal, and included the rule of Dominica, St.
Vincent, and the newly -ceded territory, with Grenada and its
dependency, the Grenadines.
The troubles of Tobago were not yet over. In 1781 the
Marquis de Bouille, noticed above as the captor of Dominica, took
possession of the island after a brave defence by its British
inhabitants, and the Treaty of Versailles, two years later, sur-
324 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
rendered the place to France. In April, 1793, during the long
war caused by the French Revolution, a British squadron in the
West Indies, under Admiral Lefroy, with a body of troops under
General Cuyler, retook the island, which again became French by
the short-lived Peace of Amiens in 1802. To make an end of a
somewhat tedious tale, Tobago was again seized by a British force
in 1803, and was finally ceded to our possession by the treaty
concluded in 1814.
The history of St. Lucia, in its varied character, closely
resembles that of Tobago. This loveliest and largest of the Wind-
ward Isles proper was constantly regarded in the seventeenth and
eighteenth centuries as well worthy of warlike efforts to conquer
and retain. Discovered by Columbus in June, 1502, when he was
prosecuting his fourth voyage, the island was then peopled by
Caribs, who remained in possession until 1639, when some English
settlers arrived, only to be destroyed or driven out in the next
year by the natives. France had already claimed dominion, in a
grant made by Louis XIII., in 1635, to two French gentlemen,
MM. de 1'Olive and Duplessis. French settlers from Martinique
were the next persons that undertook to colonize, while the French
monarch still claimed the sovereignty, and granted the island in
1642 to a West Indian company, who sold it to two private
gentlemen. The English claim, from the first, rested on priority of
settlement: the French put forward the original grant made by
their sovereign. The Caribs fiercely struggled against French
possession, but a treaty between the natives and the foreign
intruders was concluded in 1660. The next trouble arose from
the English of Barbados, who came under the command of Mr.
Warner, son of the governor at St. Kitts, and, after a severe
contest with the French holders, they became masters of St. Lucia
in 1665. Two years later the Treaty of Breda restored it to the
French, and in 1674 it was formally subjected to the French crown
as a dependency of Martinique.
Soon after the Peace of Utrecht, we find St. Lucia again made
a matter of contention between the two powers. The Regent
d'Orleans, ruling in the minority of Louis XV., made a grant of
the island to a French noble, and George I. retorted by the same
step in favour of the Duke of Montagu. Some English colonists
were settled there, when a body of troops in 1723 arrived from
COLONIAL POSSESSIONS IN THE WEST INDIES. 325
Martinique and forced them away. The two governments then
agreed to consider St. Lucia neutral ground. The outbreak of the
War of the Austrian Succession in 1 744 led to another seizure by
the French, but the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle, four years later,
made neutrality again the political condition of the much disputed
territory. The Seven Years' War, beginning in 1756, gave the
French government occasion to erect works of defence, and to pro-
vide a garrison, as sole possessors. Then the British arms were
called into service, and a naval expedition under Admiral Rodney,
commander-in-chief on the Leeward Islands station, with troops
commanded by General Monckton, the distinguished colleague of
Wolfe at Quebec, captured the island, along with Grenada and
Martinique. The Treaty of Paris, concluded by the Bute ministry
in 1763, has already been denounced in these pages for its imbecile
arrangements in connection with North American affairs. In truth,
no diplomatic instrument in our modern history is more disgraceful
than that treaty, for the weakness displayed in surrendering terri-
torial prizes of war obtained by British skill and valour. The
cession of St. Lucia to France was now perpetrated in defiance of
the fact that Lord Chatham, who had lately raised Great Britain
to the height of fame, had positively refused its surrender in pre-
vious negotiations. Rodney also, a man of the highest ability and
the soundest judgment, had formed a strong opinion of the value
of St. Lucia to our dominion in the West Indies, but he in vain
urged its retention. The French accordingly remained in posses-
sion until 1778, when, after a severe contest, British tars and troops
again proved victorious. The great victory of Rodney and Hood
in 1782 had given Great Britain a complete mastery in the region
of the Leeward Islands, and yet, at the Peace of Versailles, in the
following year, the island was again ceded to the French crown.
The outbreak of the Revolutionary War in 1793 caused a
renewal of hostilities by sea and land in the West Indies, and in
April of the following year St. Lucia was once more in our hands.
In 1796, our government was compelled to take action against
insurrectionary movements in some of the West Indian islands
which contained a French population sympathizing with the revolu-
tionary change of French affairs in Europe. Formidable risings in
St. Lucia and St. Vincent caused the despatch of a powerful naval
and military armament under Admiral Christian and Sir Ralph
326 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Abercrombie. It needed the operations of a month, from the last
week of April until nearly the end of May, before the republicans,
aided by revolted slaves, and fighting with great determination and
severe loss to both sides, were finally subdued. Sir John Moore
for a short time became governor of the island. Even then the
contests which had so long hindered progress and prosperity at St.
Lucia were not at an end. The Peace of Amiens, with a fatuity
almost incredible, restored the island to French possession, and
the outbreak of hostilities which followed that brief suspension saw
the final transfer to British rule, after a surrender to forces under
General Greenfield of the territory which had cost this country,
through the folly of her ministers, so much vain expenditure of life
and treasure. The population had been greatly diminished both
in foreign and in civil war, the latter of which was due to the
French Revolution, and many a year was to pass before a return
of prosperity. The mode of government up to, and long after, the
beginning of the nineteenth century, was in accordance with French
law.
Grenada, another of the Windward Islands, discovered by
Columbus on his third voyage, in 1498, and by him named
"Ascension", was at that time, and long remained, the abode of
ferocious man-eating Caribs. The French were the first Euro-
peans who sought to disturb the native occupation, but the
intending settlers who went thither in 1638, under a leader named
Poincy, were beaten off by the aborigines, who were attracted to
this island, as it seems, in large numbers, by the fertile soil.
Grenada had been included, in 1627, in Charles I.'s grant of "the
Carib isles" to the Earl of Carlisle, but no attempt at English
settlement was made. In 1650, Du Parquet, the French governor
of Martinique, bought Grenada from a trading company, and
prepared an expedition for the purpose of obtaining possession of
his property. A body of 200 men accompanied Du Parquet, who
is said to have at first appeased the savages by the bestowal
of knives and toys, and even to have gained the cession of
sovereignty from the resident chief in return for knives, hatchets,
and glass beads, aided by the potent persuasion of some bottles
of choice brandy. The governor of Martinique then returned to
his post, leaving a kinsman, Le Compte, in charge of Grenada.
Dissensions soon arose between the natives and the new pos-
COLONIAL POSSESSIONS IN THE WEST INDIES. 327
sessors, and a body of three hundred men was despatched from
Martinique with orders to make short work of all who gave
trouble. An internecine struggle was soon afoot, in which the
Caribs, quickly beaten in the open field by the superior weapons
and skill of their civilized foes, resorted to guerilla warfare, and to
the slaughter of every Frenchman who fell into their hands. The
contest could have but one termination, and that involved a scene
most tragic and pitiful. As their numbers were reduced, the
Caribs were forced away to the northern end of the island, where
they found themselves caught between advancing irresistible foes
and the edge of a tall cliff that overlooked the sea. A final and
desperate rally took place, in which the natives were diminished to
some forty men, and these survivors, preferring death to submis-
sion, leapt down into the sea, to be mangled on the rocks or stifled
by the waves. The summit of the cliff to this day bears the name
Le Morne des Sauleurs, or " Leapers' Hill".
The conquerors were soon at issue among themselves, and Du
Parquet, in disgust at the expense of maintaining order, sold the
island, in 1657, to the Comte de Cerillac. The ruler appointed by
the new proprietor of Grenada was a brutal tyrant, whom his
countrymen tried, condemned, and shot. A few years later, the
island was sold to the French West Indian Company, and, on the
annulling of their charter in 1674, it fell to the possession of the
French crown. The vicissitudes and troubles of the territory had
been such, that in 1700 there were but 251 European dwellers,
with about double the number of negroes, employed in the culture
of indigo, sugar, and tobacco. The planters were hampered in the
pursuit of wealth by the exactions of the tax-farmers, to whose
tender mercies, too well known to their countrymen in Europe,
they were committed by the ruinous fiscal system of French rule
before the Revolution. In 1762, as we have seen, the island was
captured, along with St. Lucia and Martinique, by the armament
under Rodney and Monckton, and in the following year, by the
Treaty of Paris, Grenada was formally ceded to Great Britain.
The produce in sugar and indigo had at that time become very
large and valuable. An important case arose in constitutional law
when the government imposed a duty of 4^ per cent upon all the
exports of the new acquisition, and, in the end, abolition of the
impost came by judgment of Lord Mansfield against the Crown.
328 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
A political contest was also occasioned by the terms on which a
representative legislature, in 1765, was granted by Great Britain to
Grenada. The new subjects, or French planters, adherents of the
Catholic Church, then received political rights which were withheld
from British-born inhabitants of the same faith. Great discontent
was thereby caused, which had evil results for the favoured French
at a later day.
In 1779, another transfer of possession took place. The war
of the American revolution was at its height, when the Comte
d'Estaing arrived off the coast, in the summer season, with a
powerful fleet, carrying a military force of 3000 men. It was
impossible for the British to offer any effective resistance. The
governor, Sir George Macartney (afterwards Governor of Madras,
and, as Lord Macartney, the first British envoy ever sent to
China), took a brave personal part in the defence made by a
garrison composed of a company of the 48th foot, 300 militia, and
150 seamen. They were overpowered by the numbers of the foe,
and were obliged to capitulate, after inflicting on the besiegers a
loss of nearly 400 men. The new rulers of Grenada displayed
much harshness and injustice towards the British inhabitants, but
the French government interfered in their behalf, and the peace of
1783 finally placed the island under the rule of Great Britain. The
political trouble was revived, however, when the Catholic French
received their former exclusive privileges, and a struggle arose
between the British and French parties, ending, after seven years,
in the latter being deprived of all their powers as sharers in the
government.
The revolutionary movement which has been referred to in the
history of St. Lucia had dire effects in Grenada. In March, 1795,
the anarchists caused an insurrection, and the island became the
scene of bloodshed accompanied by cruelties disgraceful to men
who claimed to be civilized beings. The two towns of Grenville
and Gonyave, or Charlotte Town, at opposite ends of Grenada,
were the chief places implicated in the tragedies which took place.
The British rulers were wanting in the needful firmness and
judgment in forming and applying plans of repression, and, outside
the capital, the whole island for more than a year was in the hands
of insurgents displaying all the ferocity of the worst of brigands.
The plantations were laid waste, the houses burnt, the loyalists
COLONIAL POSSESSIONS IN THE WEST INDIES. 329
murdered on every side. The two parties, actuated by the utmost
fury of political and religious or, on one side, anti-religious
hostility, waged a war without quarter. The governor, and the
Hon. Alexander Campbell, a leading colonist of much ability, were
taken prisoners by the rebels and conducted to their mountain-
camp. In April, 1795, after the failure of a weak attempt on that
stronghold, they and nearly 50 other British subjects, including
some of the chief planters and merchants, were deliberately shot.
The ministry at home was slow to send relief, and it was not till
June, 1796, that a strong force under Sir Ralph Abercrombie
landed on the shores of Grenada and began to restore order.
That brave and able Scot was no man for half-measures or ill-done
work. Within ten days of his landing, the rebels had been hunted
down in every fastness of the hills, and from that time the island
of Grenada has enjoyed the blessings of peace. The Grenadines,
a cluster of small islands, have always followed the fortunes of their
neighbours, Grenada and St. Vincent.
The history of St. Vincent in some respects resembles that of
her sister-islands in the Windward group, but she was more closely
concerned than any of those with the aboriginal race, or Caribs.
At the time of her discovery by Columbus in January, 1498,
aborigines of the lighter or yellow variety were found in posses-
sion, and they remained undisturbed for nearly two centuries,
while the island was granted, in 1627, to Lord Carlisle, declared
neutral ground in 1660, and, in 1672, given by Charles II., in
titular possession, to Lord Willoughby. No attempt at European
settlement was made during all this period, the English and
French governments having arranged, it seems, to leave Dominica
and St. Vincent to the Caribs, on their abandoning all claims to
other islands. In 1675, savages of the black race of Caribs, if
indeed they were Caribs, were found upon the island. English
and French colonists landed at this time, and, in 1722, George I.
made a grant of the territory to the Duke of Montagu. About
twenty years later, there were nearly a thousand white inhabitants,
and about thrice the number of negro slaves, whose labours
raised tropical produce to the annual value of over ,£60,000.
In 1748, St. Vincent was declared "neutral" by the Treaty of
Aix-la-Chapelle, but the outbreak of the Seven Years' War caused
its possession to be contested between France and Great Britain,
33O OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
and, in 1762, the island was taken by forces under General
Monckton, and ceded to British rule by the Treaty of Paris in the
following year. In 1773 the Caribs dwelling there, after a display
of rebellion for several years, received the grant of an extensive
district, on condition of laying down their arms and acknowledging
the rule of the British sovereign. Six years later, as we have seen,
St. Vincent was taken possession of by the French under the Comte
d'Estaing. In 1780, the island was ravaged by the most violent
hurricane ever recorded in the history of the West Indies. Three
years later St. Vincent was restored to British rule by the Treaty
of Versailles. Her history then, for many years, runs parallel to
that of Grenada.
The returning prosperity due to peace was rudely interrupted,
after the outbreak of the French Revolution, by the Caribs and
by French anarchists. The country was overrun by native and
European savages; the plantations were made desolate; the houses
burnt, and many of the British colonists murdered. After a terrible
time of violence and disorder, the expedition headed by Sir Ralph
Abercrombie restored peace to the island in 1796. The British
government then adopted the wise and necessary measure of
removing the Caribs from St. Vincent, and in March, 1797, a fleet
of transports conveyed away the natives, to the number of over
5000, to the island of Rattan, in the Bay of Honduras. The
British colonists were thereafter left to the peaceable possession
and tillage of the soil, under the rule of a governor, a council, and
a representative assembly.
The extensive group called Bahamas are of the highest interest
in connection with Columbus' discovery of the West Indies. At
one of these islands, that called by the natives " Guanahari ", by
him " San Salvador ", he first planted his foot within the New
World. The island was long identified with Cat Island, or San
Salvador, but recent researches have made it more probable that
the great navigator's first place of landing was Watling Island, at
a little distance to the east. On his arrival in October, 1492, he
found natives in possession, who believed him and his followers to
be angelic visitors from another sphere; but the Europeans only
remained a few hours, and then sailed away to other and more
important discoveries.
The unhappy aborigines had soon bitter cause to regret that
COLONIAL POSSESSIONS IN THE WEST INDIES. 331
the people from beyond the seas had become aware of their
existence. In his first letter to the Catholic sovereigns, Ferdinand
and Isabella, Columbus, amongst many other high-flown promises
of wealth to be gathered on the scene of his discovery, had given
hope of abundance of slaves for the uses of European masters.
The hint was acted on, and, by some of the worst cruelty and
wickedness due to the presence of Spaniards in the West Indies,
the Bahamas were, in course of time, stripped of all their native
population. Greed for gold, in working the mines of the first
European conquerors in the New World, caused rapid mortality,
through hardship and ill-usage, among the natives employed at
San Domingo and elsewhere. The Spaniards then resorted for
fresh supplies of labour to the people of the Bahamas. The kid-
nappers, with cruel craft, worked on the superstition of the natives
by promises to convey them to the " happy islands " where, as they
believed, their dead relatives and ancestors dwelt in bliss; and they
were induced to believe that those regions lay within a few days'
sail. About 50,000 people were thus entrapped on board the ships,
and the greater number were conveyed to San Domingo, and set to
the toil in which so many thousands had already perished. Many,
in despair, refused to eat, and fled away to die in secret places.
Others, making their way to the northern coast of the island of
their captivity, stood inhaling the breeze which they thought was
blowing from their former home, and stretched out arms of longing
for the wives and children left behind. The most part died deaths
of lingering torture, from overwork, whipping, and unfit or in-
sufficient food.
For many a year the Bahamas remained all devoid of human
dwellers, as the few males, and the women and children, left there
by the Spanish stealers of human flesh, made their way for safety
to other regions. The group was almost forgotten in Europe when
Queen Elizabeth, in 1578, conveyed the islands by charter to Sir
Humphrey Gilbert. No attempt, however, at settlement was
made until after the colonization of Virginia. About 1632 some
British settlers arrived, but they were soon destroyed or driven out
by the Spaniards. In 1646 a good number of colonists landed
from the Bermudas, and the islands began to attract attention
from lawless adventurers as a convenient haunt for pouncing on
Spanish galleons, for the profits to be gained by plundering wrecks,
332 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
and, in general, for irregular maritime gains. Grants of the island
of New Providence, of others among the group, and of the Bahamas
as a whole, were made by Charles II. to various proprietors or
proprietary bodies, and in 1671 a governor was appointed. There
was, however, no law or order established, and New Providence,
one of the chief islands, began to be a resort of pirates and
bucaneers. Spanish jealousy was aroused by the presence of
their hereditary foes, the British, and the settlement at New
Providence was laid waste in 1682. We hear of so-called "go-
vernors" being, from time to time, made prisoners by the people
whom they endeavoured to rule, and, in 1 702, one of these officials,
a scoundrel named Elias Hasket, was expelled by the people with
ignominious treatment.
In 1704, the British settlers at New Providence, left by their
new ruler, Mr. Lightwood, wholly without defence in a garrison for
the fort, were attacked by the French and Spaniards. The fort
was blown up, the town was plundered, and all the chief people
were carried off to Havannah as prisoners of war. The Spaniards,
in another descent, utterly wrecked what had been left unharmed
or unseized in the former raid, and the island of New Providence
remained desolate for some years. Then came a new " governor ",
a Mr. Birch, appointed by the " Lords Proprietors", who were not
aware, as it seems, that there was nobody to govern. The new
ruler found himself alone among the ruins of the town, and, after
camping out for a few days in the woods, wisely took notice to quit
from the mosquitos. The island was then left to the occasional
visits or temporary occupation of pirates, Spaniards, and bucaneers.
One of these adventurers, John Tench, or " Blackbeard ", was a
name of terror to mariners on the American coast-line from Nassau
to Boston, and on the Atlantic waters between the Bahamas and
Great Britain. This bold pirate was the king of the whole group
and adjacent seas, until his death in a sea-fight, in 1718, off the
coast of North Carolina. About that time the government of
George I. was requested to take measures for the establishment of
order, and British rulers then took firm possession. Respectable
settlers, many of German origin, arrived in New Providence, and
that and other islands received new vegetable stock in the shape of
cocoa-nut palms, pine-apples, and other valuable plants and trees.
In 1781, the Spaniards, then at war with Great Britain, captured
COLONIAL POSSESSIONS IN THE WEST INDIES. 333
New Providence, but they were soon driven out, and the islands
were confirmed as a British possession by the Peace of Versailles
in 1783.
The country in Central America known as Honduras has its
name from the Spanish word for " depths ", owing to the difficulty
Columbus had in anchoring off the coast. His discovery of this
region was made in 1502, when he was engaged on his fourth
voyage. The land lying round the Bay of Honduras was visited
by Pinzon, a Spanish explorer, in 1509, and by Cortez in 1519,
when he was on his way to Mexico. It is likely that, early in the
1 7th century, British bucaneers from the West Indian islands
resorted to this coast, and the second designation of British
Honduras is said to be the Spanish corruption of the name of
Wallis or Wallace, one of these adventurers who preyed on
commerce in those waters, and sought safety from the Spanish
cruisers in the many creeks or inlets of the Bay of Honduras.
The fine trees producing the valuable timber called logwood and
mahogany seem to have first attracted lawful trade, and about
1638 some settlers began to colonize the district now in British
possession. The obscurity of the early history is shown in the
fact that some accounts make Wallis one of these timber traders,
and describe him as founder of the British colony. The Spanish
were jealous of the profits made, but the new-comers and their
successors held their ground against many occasional attacks, and
the region was a kind of informal, permissive, British settlement,
ruled by magistrates annually chosen at public meeting. These
officials were invested with executive and judicial powers, and the
laws of the community were resolutions carried at public meetings
of the citizens.
An impulse to British settlement near the mouth of the Belize
river had been given by the conquest of Jamaica, in 1655, and, a
few years after that event, wood-cutters arrived from the new colony,
and the demand for the special timber of Honduras in the European
markets brought many competitors in a lucrative trade. In 1765,
Vice-admiral Sir William Burnaby was sent out from England to
visit the settlement, in order to secure the interests of the com-
munity under the Treaty of Paris. He drew up a code of local
regulations, which continued in force until 1840, and soon after the
Treaty of Versailles (1783), an executive officer, called " Superin-
334 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
tendent ", was regularly named by the home government. British
Honduras long remained, in a sense, a dependency of Jamaica for
protection and supervision, but the people, under the "constitution"
granted by George III. through Sir William Burnaby, retained
their powers of legislation at public meeting, and of choosing
magistrates by free and open vote.
The hostility of Spain had needed constant vigilance, and in
1779-81 we find Horatio Nelson, as commander of the brig
Badger, and then as post-captain, in charge of the Hinchinbrook,
engaged on the coasts of British and of Spanish Honduras, where
his health suffered severely from the effects of the climate. In
1786, by a treaty with Spain, Great Britain agreed to withdraw
from certain settlements to the south, on what was known as the
" Mosquito coast ", on condition of our people in British Honduras
being permitted to cut mahogany as well as logwood, and of our
not erecting fortifications in the country. This weak and ill-judged
concession was a sort of admission of Spanish control which soon
caused serious trouble. The British colonists were subjected to
constant hostile threats and demonstrations. In 1797, Colonel
Barrow arrived from home as " Superintendent ", invested with full
civil and military powers, and he took prompt measures for the
defence of the capital, Belize. This activity, well backed by that
of the community, had its reward in September, 1798, when the
Spaniards came in great force. A fleet of 14 sail of the line
appeared off the harbour of Belize, and met with a most determined
resistance. A severe conflict, of two days' duration, known as the
"battle of St. George's Cay" (or islet), ended in the victorious
repulse of the foe, finally and fully securing British possession of
the territory by right of conquest.
The fine island of Trinidad, discovered by Columbus, on his
third voyage, in July, 1498, received its name, according to one
account, in pursuance of a vow made by him, under severe stress
of weather, that the first new land sighted should be called in
honour of the Trinity. Some authorities, however, give Trinity
Sunday, 1496, as the date of discovery. The territory was claimed
by Columbus for the Spanish crown, and a governor was appointed
in 1532, but it was many years before the Spaniards were in firm
possession against hostile attacks. About 1584 the town of San
Jose (St. Joseph), which remained the capital for more than two
COLONIAL POSSESSIONS IN THE WEST INDIES. 335
centuries, was founded by a Spanish governor, but the place was
scarcely finished when, in 1595, Sir Walter Raleigh burnt it.
During the iyth century the island was ravaged several times
by the Dutch and the French. Early in the i8th century cocoa
was becoming an extensive and valuable article of tillage and trade,
but in 1725 a mysterious blight attacked the plantations, and stayed
prosperity for Trinidad during more than half acentury. The Spanish
government were then induced to make an extraordinary effort for
her revival, when an intelligent French planter from Grenada,
M. de St. Laurent, who had visited the island and noted its
wonderful fertility, made strong representations to the officials
at Madrid, and sought permission to carry out his scheme of
immigration. In 1783, he obtained a royal proclamation admitting
foreign settlers to the island, provided they were of the Catholic
faith. Don Jose Maria Chacon, who proved to be the last Spanish
governor of Trinidad, was appointed to carry out the new measure,
and under his auspices a large number of colonists arrived from
the French West Indies, with great additions after the events due
to the outbreak of the French Revolution. In 1789 the population
amounted to over 10,000, by a tenfold increase in the space of five
years; and to the movement inaugurated through the energy and
wisdom of M. de St. Laurent, is due the fact that so large a French
element of race is found in a colony which was never a possession
of the French crown.
The British right is due to conquest pure and simple. In
February, 1797, at a time of war with Spain, a powerful expedition
sailed from Martinique, then in our possession, and the head-
quarters of British power in the Lesser Antilles. Four line-of-
battle ships, a 64-gun ship, two frigates, and five sloops of war,
under Rear-admiral Harvey, carried nearly 7000 troops com-
manded by Sir Ralph Abercrombie, fresh from the reduction of the
insurgents at St. Lucia and St. Vincent. The Spaniards, helpless
against so formidable an armament, set fire to their own fleet of
four sail of the line and a frigate, all of which perished in the
flames, save a 74-gun ship, captured by the British boats. A few
shots fired between the forts and the hostile vessels were followed
by a capitulation to overwhelming force. Colonel Picton, after-
wards to become the famous Peninsular and Waterloo warrior, was
appointed by Abercrombie to be the first British governor of
336 OUR EMPIRE AT HOME AND ABROAD.
Trinidad, and for six years the colony derived much benefit from
his firmness in a post of difficulty and risk. The Treaty of Amiens,
in 1802, finally ceded the island to Great Britain.
The island of Jamaica, which has always been the chief British
possession in the West Indies, derives its name from an aboriginal
term Xaymaca, signifying " land of springs ". Discovered by
Columbus, in May, 1494, and by him styled St. Jago, after the
patron saint of Spain, it was not again visited by Europeans, so
far as is known, for about nine years. In 1503, the great Genoese
navigator was engaged on his fourth voyage of exploration, when
the state of his ships compelled him to put in at Jamaica, where he
remained for nearly eighteen months, until the close of the follow-
ing year.
END OF VOL. I.
SOME WORKS PUBLISHED BY
BLACKIE & SON, Limited,
LONDON, GLASGOW, EDINBURGH, AND DUBLIN.
A LIBRARY IN ITSELF.
THE POPULAR ENCYCLOPEDIA,
NEW ISSUE, REVISED.
A GENERAL DICTIONARY OF ARTS, SCIENCES, LITERATURE,
BIOGRAPHY, AND HISTORY.
EDITED BY
CHARLES ANNANDALE, M.A., LL.D.,
Editor of Ogilvie's " Imperial Dictionary of the English Language."
Profusely illustrated with Engravings.
To be completed in Fourteen handsome Volumes, super-royal 8vo, bound in rick cloth, red edges,
at 1 25. each.
The POPULAR ENCYCLOPEDIA is a perfect library in itself, superseding, practically, the
necessity of having recourse to a large number of books on different topics, and furnishing,
at moderate cost, a complete body of information on all subjects.
In its survey of human knowledge it will compare in point of fulness of detail with the
best works of its size, while in its clear concise style, and in its avoidance of technicalities,
the needs of the general reader have been constantly consulted.
It is a Dictionary of Philosophy.
It is a Dictionary of Theology.
It is a Dictionary of the Fine Arts.
It is a Dictionary of the Practical Arts and
Handicrafts.
It is a Dictionary of General Information.
This work has been aptly called a Conversations-Lexicon, since in it a man has the clue
to all topics of interest and conversation in all professions, trades, and walks of life, and is
enabled by it to equip himself to play a many-sided and intelligent part in the world.
It is A BOOK FOR THE HOUSEHOLD, being of value and interest to all its members,
old and young alike. It is in itself a liberal education, and, indeed, the best POPULAR
EDUCATOR, and it will be found of the highest service to the younger members of families
in the prosecution of their studies, and especially in the preparation of their written exercises.
It abounds with pictorial illustrations, many printed in colours, which extend to above
200 pages of Engravings, including over 2000 separate figures. In addition, there is a series
of coloured Maps, forming a valuable accompaniment to the geographical and historical
articles.
(13)
It is a Universal Gazetteer.
It is a Universal History.
It is a Biographical Dictionary.
It is a Commercial Dictionary.
It is a Dictionary of Political Theories and Facts.
It is a Dictionary of the Sciences.
Blackie & Sons Publications.
NEW EDITION—REVISED AND GREATLY AUGMENTED.
BLACKIE'S
COMPREHENSIVE HISTORY OF ENGLAND.
CIVIL AND MILITARY, RELIGIOUS, INTELLECTUAL, AND SOCIAL.
FROM THE EARLIEST PERIOD TO THE PRESENT TIME.
ILLUSTRATED BY ABOVE ELEVEN HUNDRED ENGRAVINGS IN THE TEXT.
AND SIXTY-FIVE FINELY ENGRAVED PLATES.
BESIDES THE NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS PRINTED IN THE TEXT, EACH PART
WILL CONTAIN TWO OR THREE SEPARATE PAGE ENGRAVINGS, ILLUSTRATING
IMPORTANT HISTORICAL EVENTS, PORTRAITS OF SOVEREIGNS, &c.
The work -will be completed in 26 parts, ss. each ; or 8 divisional-volumes, super-royal 8vo,
handsomely bound in cloth, price 8s. 6d. each
There is no man imbued with even the smallest spark of patriotism who does not desire to know the story of his
country, and the career of those remarkable men who, in bygone years, helped to mould the people into a nation,
and to build up those two most marvellous fabrics of modern times, The British Empire and The British Constitution.
The tale is a wondrous one : fascinating as a romance ; full of chivalrous exploits, and of high and lofty example for
every condition of life.
THE COMPREHENSIVE HISTORY OF ENGLAND in telling this story will command the appreciative interest of the
general reader, and become not only a useful book of reference but an entertaining and instructive work for the family.
A COMPLETE HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH PEOPLE.— Not only political, naval, and military, but
also civil, religious, industrial, agricultural, and mercantile, presenting picturesque descriptions of the aspects of the
various classes of society in successive periods ; concise accounts of the progress of commerce, industries, and manu-
factures ; and of the results arising from inventions and discoveries ; sketches of the advance of literature and the
fine arts ; and the spread of general enlightenment.
ELEVEN HUNDRED ENGRAVINGS. — The Eleven Hundred Engravings, printed in the text, have been carefully
prepared, with a view to the real elucidation of the History. They comprise Illustrations of the Dwellings, the Shipping,
the Armour, Dress, Manners and Customs, and Utensils of our Ancestors at various periods ; Views of Historical Sites,
Buildings, and Monuments ; Maps and Plans of Battles, Battlefields, Forts, Towns, &c. ; Portraits and Statues of Illus-
trious Persons.
NEW AND REVISED EDITION.
The Casquet of Literature:
A SELECTION IN PROSE AND POETRY from the works of the best Authors. Edited, with Bio-
graphical and Literary Notes, by CHARLES GIBBON, Author of "Robin Gray", and revised by
Miss MARY CHRISTIE. To be published in 6 volumes, bound in cloth, gilt elegant, with olivine
edges, price "]s. dd. per volume; also in 18 parts, price 2s. each.
THE CASQUET OF LITERATURE will contain more than 1000 characteristic Selections from the writings of the most
popular authors, accompanied by about 400 Biographical and Literary Notes. The stress of modern life leaves scanty
leisure for recreation, yet in the evenings when the fireside is the only comfortable place, one needs something to refresh
the jaded spirits, and obliterate for the time the worries of the day. For these purposes, what better than a good, breezy,
entertaining book? Practically a guide to the best English literature, illustrated by a series of exquisite drawings.
600 of the greatest writers in the English tongue will be represented, including Tennyson, Browning, George Eliot,
Addison, R. Louis Stevenson, S. R. Crockett, Ruskin, Andrew Lang, Douglas Jerrold, Mark Twain, J. M. Barrie, Anthony
Hope. In fact, a book in which the reader is provided with the best work of poets, novelists, essayists, humorists, story-
tellers, and artists. Material for desultory reading— the most delightful of all— of a lifetime. A casquet of inexhaustible
treasure, inasmuch as beautiful thoughts and exquisite, like diamonds, never lose their brilliance or charm.
Blackie & Son's Publications.
Descriptive Atlas of the World
and General Geography.
COMPRISING
ABOVE ONE HUNDRED CAREFULLY EXECUTED MAPS; A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
WORLD, PROFUSELY ILLUSTRATED; AND AN INDEX OF IOO,OOO PLACES.
PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF
W. G. BLACKIE, Ph. D., LL.D.,
Fellow of the Royal Geographical Societies, London and Edinburgh.
To be completed in 12 divisions atjs. each, forming a handsome volume, 16 inches x 12 inches.
The ATLAS consists of sixty -four sheets of Maps, comprising seventy -five numbered maps and above thirty inset
maps, making in all above ONE HUNDRED MAPS beautifully printed in colours, prepared from the most recent and most
authoritative materials available.
While the older countries of the world are fully shown, special prominence is given to Great Britain and its world-wide
possessions, and also to the regions recently opened up by the enterprise of adventurous travellers.
Two of the maps are worthy of special notice. The Commercial Chart of the World, showing existing and available
fields of commerce ; and The British Empire at one view, showing all the possessions at home and abroad, drawn to one
scale, and thereby enabling their relative size to be clearly appreciated.
The GENERAL GEOGRAPHY forms a very important section of the work. It supplies information geographical, his-
torical, statistical, commercial, and descriptive, of all the countries of the world.
As a useful adjunct both to the Maps and the General Geography there is given a Pronouncing Vocabulary of Geogra-
phical Names. In addition to this, an Extensive Index of Places forms a very useful section of the work.
Blackie's Modern Cyclopedia
OF UNIVERSAL INFORMATION. A Handy-book of Reference on all subjects and for all
readers. Edited by CHARLES ANNANDALE, M.A., LL.D., Editor of "Ogilvie's Imperial Dictionary",
&c. With many Pictorial Illustrations and a series of Maps and Plates.
THE MODERN CYCLOPEDIA has been designed as a handy-book of reference for all readers. It presents its information
in concise and tersely-written articles, comprised in eight compact volumes, issued at a very moderate price. It is thus
well adapted for everyday use and ready reference, and will be specially valuable to those who, through the pressure of
their daily occupations, can spare little time to acquire information on the many topics with which they desire to become
better acquainted.
THE MODERN CYCLOPEDIA, while by no means neglecting things that belong to ancient times, devotes its strength
mainly to matters which pertain to the present day and to the modern world.
THE MODERN CYCLOPEDIA is fully abreast of the times on the wide range of subjects upon which it touches, the best
and most recent authorities, British and Foreign, having been consulted in compiling the articles. It furnishes information
on all classes of subjects — literary, historical, biographical, mercantile, political, geographical, technical, and scientific.
BLACKIE'S MODERN CYCLOPEDIA is of handy size, convenient for reference, and moderate in price; it will consist of
8 compact volumes, square 8vo, of 512 pages each, bound in rich cloth, coloured edges, price 6s. each volume ; or in fine
leather binding (Library style), 8s. 6d. a volume.
To be completed in 14 parts, super-royal 8vo, at 2s. each ; or in 4 divisions, stiff paper cover, at "js. each,
forming one handsome volume ; or in 4 divisions, cloth, at gs. each.
The Household Physician:
A FAMILY GUIDE TO THE PRESERVATION OF HEALTH AND TO THE DOMESTIC TREATMENT OF
AILMENTS AND DISEASE. By J. M'GREGOR- ROBERTSON, M.B., C.M. (Hon.). With an Introduction
by Professor M'KENDRICK, M.D., LL.D., F.R.S., Glasgow University. Illustrated by about 400 figures
in the text, and a series of 19 Engraved Plates, many of them printed in colours.
This work is written in the simplest possible language, and includes full information on the conditions of health, and
on the ordinary means, as regards food, clothing, exercise, &c. , by which health may be maintained in the infant as well
as in the full-grown person.
The book treats of the human body in health, and the various changes produced by disease. On Hygiene, or the
conditions of health as regards food, drink, clothing, exercise, &c., and the rules to be observed for the promotion of health,
both of individuals and communities. An explanation of the nature and mode of action of drugs and other remedial agents.
On methods of dealing with Accidents and Emergencies, and on various ailments requiring surgical treatment. Also a
chapter on Sick-nuising, and an Appendix containing recipes for Invalid Cookery and medical Prescriptions.
Blackie & Sons Publications.
THE HENRY IRVING SHAKESPEARE.— SUBSCRIPTION EDITION.
The Works of Shakespeare.
EDITED BY
HENRY IRVING AND FRANK A. MARSHALL.
With a General Introduction and Life of Shakespeare by Professor EDWARD DOVVDEN, and nearly
six hundred Illustrations from designs by GORDON BROWNE and other Artists. To be completed
in 25 parts, super-royal 8vo, 3^. each ; or 8 volumes, cloth elegant, IOJ. 6d. each, with gilt
edges, iu. 6d. each.
The universal popularity of the works of our GREAT DRAMATIST has induced the publishers to issue a sumptuous
edition, of such comprehensive excellence that it is fitted at once to meet the requirements of the general reader, the
lover of fine books, and the student of Shakespeare. This important edition in many respects has never been surpassed.
*** Every subscriber for this edition of Shakespeare's Works will be presented, on the completion of his copy of
the book, with an impression of the admirable PORTRAIT OF HENRY IRVING AS HAMLET, from the painting
by EDWIN LONG, R.A., executed in Photogravure in the most finished manner by Boussod Valadon et Cie. (Goupil ,
of Paris. The size of the engraved surface is 19^ x 13^ inches, and with margin suitable for framing 27X20 inches.
" On the care with which the text itself of the plays has been prepared -we have nothing but praise to bestow. , . .
The general result of this care and labour is, however, so good that we must congratulate all concerned in it: and in
particular we must congratulate the publishers of the work on one especial feature which could hardly fail to ensure its
success as a popular edition — it is profusely illustrated by Mr. Gordon Browne, whose charming designs, executed in
facsimile, give it an artistic value superior, in our judgment, to any illustrated edition of Shakespeare with which we
are acquainted." — The Athenrcum.
" This handsomely printed edition aims at being popular and practical. Add to these advantages Mr. Gordon
Browne's illustrations, and enough has been said to recommend an edition which will win public recognition by its unique
and serviceable qualities." — The Spectator.
/
In 17 parts, extra demy 8vo, at 2s. each; or 5 volumes, cloth elegant, gilt edges, at 8s. 6d. each.
NEW PICTORIAL EDITION.
The Works of Robert Burns,
With a series of Authentic Pictorial Illustrations, Marginal Glossary, numerous Notes, and Appendixes.
Also the life of Burns by J. G. LOCKHART, and Essays on the Genius, Character, and Writings of
Burns, by THOMAS CARLYLE and PROFESSOR WILSON. Edited by CHARLES ANNANDALE, M.A., LL.D.,
editor of the "Imperial Dictionary", &c.
In this edition of Burns his writings are presented in two Sections, the one containing the poetry, the other the prose.
Marginal explanations of Scottish words accompany each piece that require such aid, enabling anyone at a glance to
apprehend the meaning of even the most difficult passages.
The Pictorial Illustrations, which consist of Fifty -six beautiful Landscapes and Portraits, engraved on steel in the most
finished manner, form a very distinctive feature of this edition. The Landscapes embrace the principal scenes identified
with the Life and Writings of the Poet, and are from pictures painted by D. O. HILL, R.S.A.
Altogether in no other edition is so much light thrown from all points of view upon Burns the poet and Burns the man,
and it may therefore be said to be complete in the best sense of the word.
In 1 8 parts, super-royal 410, at 2s. each ; in 6 divisions at 6j. each ; and also in 2 volumes, large 4to,
elegantly bound in cloth, gilt edges, price 24^. each.
The Natural History of Animals
(CLASS MAMMALIA— ANIMALS WHICH SUCKLE THEIR YOUNG), In Word and Picture. By
CARL VOGT, Professor of Natural History, Geneva, and FRIEDRICH SPECHT, Stuttgart. Translated
and Edited by GEO. G. CHISHOLM, M.A., B.SC. Illustrated by above 300 fine Engravings on wood.
This account of the animals comprised in the class Mammalia has a decidedly popular character — not through lack of
scientific value, but because the author presents the facts in an attractive form, and studies to smooth the path of those
who can give only their leisure hours to learning the results of scientific research. The author's style is above all things
clear, simple, and direct, and, where occasion offers, lively and animated.
The artist has portrayed in the most spirited manner the animals as they appear in the varied circumstances of real
life, in quest of their prey, caressing their young ones, or sporting with their fellows. The engravings have been executed
in the most careful and finished manner, under Mr. Specht's own direction.
Blackie & Son's Publications.
The work will be completed in 16 parts imperial 8vo, published monthly, at 2s. 6d. each;
or 6 volumes, beautifully bound, at 9*. each.
The Natural History of Plants
THEIR FORMS, GROWTH, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION. Translated from
the German of ANTON KERNER VON MARILAUN, Professor of Botany in the University of Vienna,
by F. W. OLIVER, M.A., D.Sc., Quain Professor of Botany in University College, London, with the
assistance of MARIAN BUSK, B.SC., and MARY EWART, B.SC. With about 1000 Original Woodcut
Illustrations and Sixteen Plates in Colours.
KERNER'S NATURAL HISTORY OF PLANTS, now for the first time presented to English readers, is one of the greatest
works on Botany ever issued from the press. Its province is the whole realm of Plant Life, and its purpose, as conceived
by the author, Professor Kerner, of Vienna University, is to provide "a book not only for specialists and scholars, but also
for the many ". That plants, like animals, are possessed of instinct and endowed with sensation ; that in fact no marked
boundary-line exists between the world of plants and the world of animals, are curious truths, of which the fewest of us
were aware, but which are here made plain. The reader will indeed find matter of novel and entrancing interest on every
page. He will read of rootless plants free to move from place to place, of plants whose roots hang suspended in mid-air, of
strange carnivorous plants that capture their prey in traps and pitfalls of cunning device, of parasitic plants that live and
are nourished, some on fellow-plants, others on animals. He will find described, not merely our own familiar vegetation,
but the whole world's flora, in its relation to the Science of Biology.
ORIGINAL — WELL WRITTEN — WELL TRANSLATED — BEAUTIFULLY ILLUSTRATED.
In 19 parts, 2s. each ; or 6 divisional volumes, super-royal 8vo, cloth elegant, 8.r. 6d. each.
A History of the Scottish People
From the Earliest to the Latest Times. By REV. THOMAS THOMSON and CHARLES ANNANDALE,
M.A., LL.D. With 40 Original Designs by W. H. MARGETSON, ALFRED PEARSE, WALTER PAGET,
GORDON BROWNE, and other eminent artists.
It is a full and detailed History of Scotland from the Earliest Times to the Latest.
It is a History of the Scottish People, their manners, customs, and modes of living at the various successive periods.
It is a History of Religion and Ecclesiastical Affairs in Scotland.
It is a History of Scotland's progress in Commerce, Industry, Arts, Science, and Literature.
In 14 parts, 2s. each; or 4 vols., super- royal 8vo, cloth elegant, 8s. 6d. each.
The Cabinet of Irish Literature.
A Selection from the Works of the chief Poets, Orators, and Prose Writers of Ireland. Edited, with
biographical sketches and literary notices, by CHARLES A. READ, F.R.H.S., author of "Tales and
Stories of Irish Life", " Stories from the Ancient Classics", &c. Illustrated by a series of 32 admirable
Portraits in mesochrome, specially prepared for this work.
The Publishers aim in this Work to supply a standard work in which the genius, the fire, the pathos, the humour, and
the eloquence of Irish Literature are adequately represented. The specimens selected, which are arranged chronologically
from the earliest to the present time, will both present a historical view of Irish Literature, and enable the reader to judge
of the individual style and particular merit of each author, while to those not critically disposed the infinite variety presented
in this convenient collective form will afford both instruction and amusement.
In 15 parts, 2s. each; or two handsome vols., super-royal 8vo, cloth, 36*.
The Works of the Ettrick Shepherd,
IN POETRY AND PROSE. Centenary Edition. With a Biographical Memoir by the Rev.
THOMAS THOMSON. Illustrated by Forty-four fine Engravings on steel, from Original Drawings by
D. O. HILL, R.S.A., K. HALSEWELLE, A.R.S.A., W. SMALL, and J. LAWSON.
Hogg's Works comprise Tales in Prase, illustrative of Border history and superstitions. They comprise likewise
Poems of great imaginative power and descriptive beauty ; Ballads full of humour and touches of tender pathos ; and Songs
which, besides being universally popular when first made public, are still cherished as among the finest productions of our
native lyric muse.
Blackie & Sons Publications.
To be compkted in four half- volumes, super-royal 8vo, at 12s. 6d. each; or in
twelve parts at 3*. 6d. each.
The Steam Engine:
A TREATISE ON STEAM ENGINES AND BOILERS. Comprising the Principles and Practice of the
Combustion of Fuel, the Economical Generation of Steam, the Construction of Steam Boilers ; and the
Principles, Construction, and Performance of Steam Engines — Stationary, Portable, Locomotive, and
Marine, exemplified in Engines and Boilers of Recent Date. By DANIEL KINNEAR CLARK,
M.inst. C.E., M.I.M.E. ; Author of "Railway Machinery"; "A Manual of Rules, Tables, and Data for
Mechanical Engineers"; &c. &c. Illustrated by above 1300 Figures in the Text, and a Series of
Folding Plates drawn to Scale.
This work provides a comprehensive, accurate, and clearly written text-book, fully abreast of all the recent developments
in the principles and practice of the Steam Engine.
Written in full view of the great advances of modern times, it expounds the principles and describes the practice
exemplified in the construction and use of Steam Engines and Boilers, in all their varieties.
In 20 parts, 2s. each; or 5 divisions, royal 410, 8.r. each; or one vol., cloth, gilt edges, 42^.
Suggestions in Design;
A comprehensive series of Original Sketches in various Styles of Ornament, arranged for application in
the Decorative and Constructive Arts, comprising 102 plates, containing more than I loo distinct and
separate "suggestions", by JOHN LEIGHTON, F.S.A. To which is added descriptive and historical
letterpress, with above 200 explanatory engravings, by JAMES KELLAWAY COLLING, F.R.I. B.A.
These suggestions are throughout original, designed in the spirit, and with the proper art feeling of the various styles
to which they severally belong, and are the accumulated result of long and arduous studies, extending over many years
of investigation and thought
This work will be found to be eminently suited to the wants of nearly every one who has occasion for decoration in
whatever form ; — to the worker in stone, wood, metal, ivory, glass, and leather — to the house-painter, decorator, &c. &c.
In 20 parts, super-royal quarto, 2s. each ; or 8 divisions, 55. each.
The Carpenter and Joiner's Assistant.
By JAMES NEWLANDS, late Borough Engineer of Liverpool. New and Improved Edition, Being a
Comprehensive Treatise on the selection, preparation, and strength of Materials, and the Mechanical
principles of Framing, with their applications in Carpentry, Joinery, and Hand Railing ; also, a com-
plete treatise on Lines ; and an Illustrated Glossary of Terms used in Architecture and Building.
Illustrated by above One Hundred Engraved Plates, containing above Nine Hundred Figures; and
above Seven Hundred Geometric, Constructive, and Descriptive Figures interspersed throughout the text
" We know of no treatise on Carpentry and Joinery which at all approaches this in merit. . . . We strongly
urge our practical mechanics to obtain and study it."— Mechanics' Magazine.
In 24 parts, demy 4to, at 2s. each ; or in 6 volumes, artistically bound in cloth extra,
with olivine edges, at loj. each.
The Works of Shakspeare,
Revised from the best Authorities; with a Memoir and Essay on his Genius by BRYAN W. PROCTER
(Barry Cornwall), Annotations and Introductory Remarks on the Plays by distinguished Writers, and
numerous Illustrative Engravings from Designs by KENNY MEADOWS and T. H. NICHOLSON.
The most distinctive, as well as the most attractive feature of this edition of the Works of Shakspeare consists in the
pictorial illustrations with which it is so copiously enriched. These are upwards of 730 in number, and bring most vividly
before the reader the scenes and incidents occurring in the different plays.
By far the greater number are by the well-known artist KENNY MEADOWS, and so important are these illustrations
that the edition of which they form a part has been appropriately named the Kenny Meadows Shakspeare.
Each play is accompanied by an original introduction, and explanatory notes from the pens of various writers dis-
tinguished for their critical acumen and their wide knowledge and high appreciation of Shakspeare's writings. Altogether
this work will be found not unworthy of him who " was not of an age, but for all time ".
Blackie & Sons Publications.
In 12 parts, small 410 size, price 2s. each; or 4 volumes, cloth elegant, gilt edges, 9.?. each.
Our Sovereign Lady Queen Victoria:
HER LIFE AND JUBILEE. By THOMAS ARCHER, F.R.H.S., Author of "Pictures and Royal
Portraits"; "Fifty Years of Social and Political Progress"; &c. Illustrated by a series of 28 highly-
finished Etchings.
It is believed that for the multitudes of men and women who regard the Queen with a sentiment that may be spoken
of as that of personal regard and affection, no more fitting memorial can be provided than a. complete and worthy Life of
our Sovereign Lady — a "Life" such as that which is here announced. The narrative presents a biographical rather than
a historical record: a record, faithful, interesting, and well illustrated, of the Royal Family and of the Queen as Sovereign
Lady rather than as Sovereign Ruler.
The ILLUSTRATIONS consist of a series of twenty-eight highly-finished etchings, including portraits of Her Majesty,
the late Prince Consort, and all the members of their Family; also scenes and events in which the Queen has personally
taken part.
The Life of our Lord and Saviour
Jesus Christ,
And the Lives of the Apostles and Evangelists. By Rev. JOHN FLEETWOOD, D.D. With Copious
Illustrative and Explanatory Notes, selected from the Works of the most eminent modern writers on
New Testament History. Illustrated by Two Hundred and Fifty Engravings printed in the Text, and
Thirty-three highly-finished Engravings on steel. A handsome royal 410 volume, gilt edges, 40^.
The attractiveness and value of this edition of the Life of our Saviour is greatly enhanced by the addition of a large
number of illustrative and supplementary notes from the works of recent writers, among whom may be named Archbishop
TRENCH, Dean ALFORD, Dean STANLEY, WEBSTER and WILKINSON, VINET, NEANDER, LANGE, BEN&EL, ANGUS, STIER,
WESTCOTT, JAMES HAMILTON, FAIRBAIRN, Dr. WILLIAM SMITH, &c.
To be completed in 15 parts, folio (size 16^ x n^ inches), price 5^. each.
The Practical Decorator and Ornamentist.
For the use of ARCHITECTS, PAINTERS, DECORATORS, and DESIGNERS. Containing one hundred
Plates in colours and gold. With Descriptive Notices, and an Introductory Essay on Artistic and
Practical Decoration. By GEORGE ASHDOWN AUDSLEY, LL.D., F.R.I.B.A., and MAURICE ASHDOWN
AUDSLEY, Architect.
The highly practical and useful character of this important Work will at once commend it to those interested in
decorative art, to whom it is more immediately addressed.
It will be found useful to the Modeller, the Plasterer, the Stone Carver, the Wood Carver, the Fret Cutter, the Inlayer,
the Cabinetmaker, the Potter, the Engraver, the Lithographer, the House Painter, the Architect, the Interior Decorator,
and, indeed, to every workman who has anything to do with ornament and design. To the student in drawing and orna-
mental design it presents a wide field of suggestive study.
Fourth Edition. Large 8vo (1000 pp.), cloth, i6j., or half-morocco, zos.
A Manual of Rules, Tables, and Data
FOR MECHANICAL ENGINEERS, based on the most recent investigations. By DANIEL KINNEAR
CLARK, author of "Railway Machinery", &c. &c. Illustrated with numerous Diagrams.
This book comprises the leading rules and data, with numerous tables, of constant use in calculations and estimates
relating to Practical Mechanics :— presented in a reliable, clear, and handy form, with an extent of range and completeness
of detail that has not been attempted hitherto. This (the fourth) edition has been carefully revised, and in its preparation
advantage has been taken of many suggestions made by those using the former editions.
"Mr. Clark writes with great clearness, and he has a great power of condensing and summarizing facts, and
he has thus been enabled to embody in his volume a collection of data relating to mechanical engineering, such as has
certainly never before been brought together. We regard the book as one which no mechanical engineer in regular
practice can afford to be without." — Engineering.
Blackie & Sons Publications.
To be completed in 21 parts, super- royal 8vo, 2s. each; or in 6 volumes, cloth extra, gs. 6d. each.
NEW ISSUE.
The Imperial Bible-Dictionary,
HISTORICAL, BIOGRAPHICAL, GEOGRAPHICAL, AND DOCTRINAL. Edited by Rev. PATRICK
FAIRBAIRN, D.D., author of "Typology of Scripture"; &c. With Introductions by the Right Rev.
J. C. RYLE, D.D., Lord Bishop of Liverpool, and Rev. C. H. WALLER, M.A. Illustrated by about
Seven Hundred Engravings.
This Edition will be augmented by an interesting discussion on the subject of INSPIRATION, by the Rev. C. H.
WALLER, Principal of the London College of Divinity. To this is prefixed a luminous introduction on the same subject
by the Right Rev. JOHN CHARLES RYLE, Lord Bishop of Liverpool.
The Work takes up in alphabetical order all the subjects which enter into the contents of the Bible, while the several
books of which the Bible is composed in every case receive careful and attentive consideration. In the treatment of the
different topics, full advantage is taken of the materials which modern criticism and research have accumulated.
The Pictorial Illustrations include representations of the plants and animals mentioned in Scripture, notable scenes and
places, manners of social life, and the manifold productions of human skill. In addition to these illustrations, a Series of
Views engraved on steel in the most finished manner accompany the work.
New Issue, to be completed in 6 half-volumes, imperial 8vo, cloth extra, gs. 6d. each.
Accurately reprinted from the Author's own editions. Collected and edited, with an introduction to
each Treatise, numerous illustrative and explanatory notes, and a memoir of Bunyan, by GEORGE OFFOR.
Illustrated by engravings on steel and on wood.
Among the Illustrative Engravings will be found the Portrait of Bunyan after Sadler; and a careful copy of the inter-
esting Portrait by R. White, now in the British Museum; Views of Bedford, and Prison on Bedford Bridge; of Bunyan's
Cottage, the Market-house and Church, Elstow; and of Bunyan's Tomb in Bunhill Fields. Also, a Series of beautiful
Illustrations of The Pilgrim from Stothard's elegant designs; with Facsimiles of Bunyan's Writing, and of the earliest
wood-cut illustrations to The Pilgrim, and to the Life of 'Bad-man.
All the excellencies of this much admired and highly valued edition of Bunyan's Whole Works (of which over twenty
thousand copies have been sold) are retained, the work being simply reprinted with occasional improvements in typography.
Eleven vols., post 8vo, cloth, red edges, 3-r. 6d. each; or in handsome case, £2, is.
Commentary on the New Testament,
Explanatory and Practical. With Questions for Bible-classes and Sunday-schools. By ALBERT
BARNES. Edited by the Rev. ROBERT FREW, D.D. With numerous additional Notes, and an ex-
tensive series of beautiful Engravings and Maps, not in any other edition.
Shortly before his decease the Author completed a revision of his Notes on the New Testament, to the end of the Acts
of the Apostles, the only section of the New Testament respecting the exposition and illustration of which modern research
had accumulated new and important materials.
In making this new issue the first three volumes have been re-set so as to embody the author's latest corrections and
additions, and they are now presented for the first time to readers in this country. This issue will consequently be the most
complete and perfect of any published in Great Britain.
In royal 410, cloth, gilt edges, y>s.
Family Worship:
A Series of Devotional Services for every Morning and Evening throughout the Year, adapted to the
purposes of Domestic Worship; Prayers for Particular Occasions, and Prayers suitable for Children, &c.
By above Two HUNDRED EVANGELICAL MINISTERS. Illustrated by Twenty-six fine Engravings on
steel. New and Improved Edition.
The work comprises 732 Services, adapted to be used in the family, being a service for every MORNING and EVENING
throughout the year, with Special Services for the Morning and Evening of New-year's Day. Each Service is composed
of Praise, Prayer, and Scriptural Exposition. Thus it points out a suitable psalm or hymn to be sung; next it refers
to a portion of Scripture to be read from the Bible itself, and adds some brief explanatory and practical remarks ; and the
whole closes with a plain and earnest Prayer.
LONDON: BLACKIE & SON, LIMITED; GLASGOW AND EDINBURGH.
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE
CARDS OR SLIPS FROM THIS POCKET
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARY
DA Sanderson, Edgar
16 The British Empire in the
336 nineteenth century ...