ig
yD
4
.
’
fi
.
\ , \
FM
:
wy
j 7 i “4
"
1
*
y
‘
’
.
‘
'
a
}
; ve
ial
: i
‘ na
»
7
a»
1
e
f
'
x
=
“a
:
:
:
-
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM
Bulletin 82
A MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS
BY
AUSTIN HOBART CLARK
Assistant Curator, Division of Marine Invertebrates
United States National Museum
VOLUME 1
THE COMATULIDS
PART 1
WASHINGTON
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
1915
[i “a8
| , see
LPNs BULLETIN OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM, “i
F. IssuED June 10, 1915. ns 7
rhs
Tor
D 7
4 man
. ‘
:
| uf
is
7 -
ADVERTISEMENT.
The scientific publications of the United States National Museum consist of two
series, the Proceedings and the Bulletins.
The Proceedings, the first volume of which was issued in 1878, are intended pri-
marily as a medium for the publication of original, and usually brief, papers based
on the collections of the National Museum, presenting newly-acquired facts in
zoology, geology, and anthropology, including descriptions of new forms of animals,
and revisions of limited groups. One or two volumes are issued annually and dis-
tributed to libraries and scientific organizations. A limited number of copies of
each paper, in pamphlet form, is distributed to specialists and others interested in
the different subjects as soon as printed. The date of publication is printed on
each paper, and these dates are also recorded in the table of contents of the volumes.
The Bulletins, the first of which was issued in 1875, consist of a series of separate
publications comprising chiefly monographs of large zoological groups and other
general systematic treatises (occasionally in several volumes), faunal works, reports
of expeditions, and catalogues of type-specimens, special collections, etc. The
majority of the volumes are octavos, but a quarto size has been adopted in a few
instances in which large plates were regarded as indispensable.
Since 1902 a series of octavo volumes containing papers relating to the botanical
collections of the Museum, and known as the Contributions from the National Her-
barium, has been published as bulletins.
The present work forms No. 82 of the Bulletin series.
RicHarp RaTHBun,
Assistant Secretary Smithsonian Institution,
In charge of the United States National Museum.
Wasuineton, D. C., April 21, 1915.
HUNRAL ALO
sary An lene iawn fleet (auntlaleess gle blr eave cb yeaa coop Eo bege
. 7 aA + Cyit a waa Harney le al
sly leghinaeal wad 4 onal litve Temuco jeden ous sige sah)
Lewd sxe Jur! slaw mt fetnaiie le Gutfaniy, pits wi a ne i be
o? atont denn avi citawri tr aL lati al e iopeerne
ulpatiiin Ya Witt ‘imep 10 atbod Jey wee ute eulig ot oli bea
:
atte Viiiee ORLA Pepe «ti neue Ww) 2) ONT mclaitre ate
VW ehighns hh Gadvite. hohe ‘A AIDA asl ee! batitutemm, tris ure
ire Gee tecrpodcr lpia ye Lith Widllawate o byattithin te 5 oF iste) fn hea
efte Ua tiiping ad ud tne Tong Va gtab ult FOF | aie pew « vngif
wurtal'y alt hewiire aaa te te T edt Di Neeser lragmanat dnd a , Le
butte | Wie @ We rani AVE Wi Deaths eal? iste Tee deyttl ont) “ae a id
wien ‘iitidte we copa ei he
epecetery bree facind ier dley Lie youth Glatolan oy) etait of hina eed ee fh Nhat
olf vata adtertyotiow sdpeigfe anes Vaotin yy) Ie tris gerbes brn broken» get nays Ve
wAl aiante igpoline imse \ «ah WM ee aiu?,; pit’ mo eae
ihe ye taiay eilbut aw habainet ote « ynalepogral aie f Abas
ba dt liat Orbe ot si ial 4 wil CTL es Ai lk meal wo 1d pabel a ws th
AWaantiia ld alt an ca rl | tonal whet wih We ey
tin’ ae a Faded ony weve nn
rulball lo Ga 04 ate atv I
whiny Han agrey faci yodiaws pork ta) meget
“| WAL aia Th paws naive)
VAT! «tranoutl
; gi
wabwetdewl Myetoa vApleolk lvokheak
ioe WOE: ular aitite. We io val i verona ait
ANE PTS Viney al) Ls
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
PRR CO set oe yar con erate ee 2 io ise AD) eas ae eeee tee: ack Sere ccs dee te eek bal eee
History of the work, with an account of the material studied........................-------
Generalimethodrot treatments: «425 9-5 stone sce ooo anc cbine 2 51s tees SU
itimbryolopyadevelopmentiand anatomy? —.cse sens a osm ee eet a ses eens Jase
Wariantal and aberrants ome. ces ec yee cat actarse dere |= Seto aureys slay mi ee gal eieie stasis Saareoee =
Philosophicalliconclusions®.2 ee. = epic ese ens a-ak eee = acess cee ae
Relative status ofthe recent crimolds ss s+. seseeer os.c.< cine sects seme tad eases Aree
MU strattiOns: oes taseee Seen ecio ce se eet ose e acai oases ene sees rceccseen eas ssnsee ee
Identification of the specimens upon which this work is based. ............-.-------------
Individuals and institutions to which the author is indebted.................-..----------
History iomihesubjeet-naseeer ote caen nce Som cece ee ease acessarissecccateues Bee eee eeIs ee
(Genera lilintonyseee et ese cine sean asters seats es eine se ee ee Sotelo ue ote =e eer
History of the intensive work upon the comatulids...............-.-.--------+--+--+--------
Generallenrveyiouiheynistonyaets s--c2o2e sae seiacioccine comes eine eee ccisecieles seat cise cemiee
Glossary of terms used in the description of a comatulid..............--.---.------------------
Hxplanation of symbolase secs ete ks sce o seees Soeericie aes sisie wes Sac selects cia aU a nteeiele curate
Weacripwonrola COmAmiiGsen oes yee ee ses case tee nee Sie Sean eee se eee esacss tac meserse aes
fidentiicatonobrecent comatn oss 6.22 ceNee mac ee ease ie ane nes eerie eee eee
Structure and Anatomy coe srcioe = Sect m sass oc armies mente orarap er ein in alee aes om aise a = siamo
HAS Lomsy Ol UN GASEl OJ CC Ose arate efor areca inet taal ese tla Paton sere alas ease aera ore Benes
Generalihistory Se est ooo aes Sear ars c coos Sonat Se seae cee See ee se canis t Sons ymoen arse
Generalistirveysotthe)histony-seass= sees se ate sae aaa ee ee eee eens sa ast
Organizationvorgthe CrinOid saa eere a. 5 ee cele eer ete lar eee aia el a aa ee
Generailfremarksscs.55 fue So eee cee en eee soins oe ee as Sa ee ee Se eee
ypstandisermenta won cate - n= soe eas eae ag se ae ae on Seen aae aeemeraaaee
Developmentronthoe lanvesyce so ster = eote seo ae easiest eee eee ena nae wie iets
Hehmodermalsskeleton' 4 sesso soso ees coat eaten cise ome wale oe teem enone see
PATHLOLONRY Bare ee = oe te ae tec male St ee ne Re eee oe ee clo oe aries meters ais
Orientation and the metameric divisions of the echinoderms.................-.-------
Relationships between the digestive tube and asymmetry..............--.-------------
Ones Ol SIMtAT Ake) tal’ POLODCY,sa-ce eee sce no ae en eee ie sis srasite wie eines Rania ere
ternalinkelotons-c2. 525 sccsnn cc odes ese ce eee tee erin aan emer oe seinisefac soisiemn
Skeleton of the heteroradiate echinoderms................--.--------------------+----
Effect of external mechanics upon the crinoids........-.....---./.---------+----------
HMarliesterinoidss= tote. oc seen sec oa eee nc een no ne ec/ae ee kiss aucinrais cet s ons =
IB Tes COI Bete ee ae ete tare ER ks cee eat ie ee wicca Re
INGRVOUR IS VSUG I eee sates siete a actaie tate aa eicte ei ae ee ieee inna eat ae
TE yes ee I wale Sere aetna te ete eles cena ore lay eer cies es into cte Taam
SENET WE bot eae Soec aS pogo Sec oben. Se beanss cecos cb ose cece epaceEEpE eee
IRER@re LOR VO FP ALIN Saisie eae oe =i = Soe eet aia = ere = alate eerie eieie = eter tette mat
Ganitaliducistsscsiscnis. oS. am stints asinerseimise a sie oo aaieis ae eee eralaoleint= = mictercte [ate tamale
VI TABLE OF CONTENTS.
Structure and anatomy—Continued.
Organization of the crinoids—Continued. Page.
Abies a wesc ee ee a a ea recat ees ae re a ah tS = 190
Promachocrinus and’ ‘Thaumatocrmus::-.. 22 52.0. 2. eee en «secs se eens ee eee 191
Galcarcoun structiras.<.: 2. ei. cece aks ested ete ae ie ao sae derele yore 2 kite he eo 194
Skeleton. asia: whole: <.c625 s2aaesec eco: ates ie Se sete soe nent tos eee eee eee ee 194
Golunin «2:0... 6s oo eee ss SEE Soe SOR POs SE ee Aan ec ce ee ee Ee 198
Gan trodoreal® cae bos a eae eee wea rere citings eS STS SES els hd cote cir ee eee 219
Gime fs oon ose ease Bens RS ws aaa aes BR Ree Te aa = Sn a ee Ae 258
Infrabasalas 2 Coe 68 ong ss Set cee cots salatnctlacnaiwcle ws aoe dl aaw is sate nee ae ees 313
Basals, and structures formed from and associated with them ................-..------ 316
Radianal <s2 v5 Letts cs sonst eae = Je he eae eee eee eee ee ioe oie Dees ere eet 331
Tnitenradials: ansllces << fs ree oe ee ee 335
‘Perisoniie:interradials ssc. < Peso Ses et ee ee ee 339
Primary, plates of. the disk= 222 2255..2 5. Ste tes Stee eee oe ee ee eee 339
Oral cece aos eae ek cee SUSE SSUES oad SORE O ee Seee ae 340
General proportions of;calyx and ita contents'=>- 3.2.2. ee we ee ee eee 341
Radiale...22< 52: 2esscco eee htt ed Reenter ce ed nee ctad ce oe cae eee ee eee eee 348
Explanation of plates: << <.-)2'22). tose ene ea ee see ae eRe enemas 383
A MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS.
By Austin Hoparr CLark,
Assistant Curator, Division of Marine Invertebrates, United States National Museum.
PREFACE.
HISTORY OF THE WORK, WITH AN ACCOUNT OF THE MATERIAL STUDIED.
Upon the return of the United States Fisheries steamec Albatross from her
cruise in 1906 through the Bering Sea and in Asiatic Russian and Japanese waters,
during which I accon:panied her as acting naturalist, the Commissioner of Fisheries,
Hon. George M. Bowers, very kindly intrusted to me the work of identifying and
describing the Crinoidea which had been collected.
The aim of the work as originally planned was the preparation of a memoir
dealing only with the specimens collected on this cruise, but it was later suggested
that I include in my study the crinoids from the North Pacific which had previously
been collected by the Albatross, and had been deposited in the United States National
Museum.
The work proved to be far more of an undertaking than had been anticipated ;
so great was the number of new species and so radically did they alter the conception
of the recent representatives of the Crinoidea as a whole that I was at last forced to
begin at the beginning and to review critically the whole subject.
The two great monographs of Dr. Philip Herbert Carpenter were, of course, the
foundation upon which I expected to build; but, with the enormous mass of material
at hand, I soon discovered that the subject must be approached along somewhat
different lines from those by which it was approached by Carpenter, especially in
regard to the comatulids. I therefore laid aside the literature and, with nothing but
the specimens before me, attempted to elucidate the systematic problems presented
with a mind free from preconceived ideas. The specimens were grouped into species
and the species into tentative genera, and these genera again into tentative families,
upon characters, both external and internal, which I myself determined; when my
ideas had become sufficiently crystallized I again took up the study of the literature
and compared my results with those of Carpenter.
Up to this time the work had all been based upon north Pacific species from the
Asiatic and American coasts. Radical systematic revision based upon material from
a limited district only has seldom proved long lived, and T was therefore extremely
anxious to examine additional collections in order to test my conclusions and to
investigate further many problems connected with geographic, bathymetric, and
1
2 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
thermal distribution, and with ecology, in which I had become interested largely
through my observations while at sea.
Prof. Walter K. Fisher, of Stanford University, California, had been working
upon the echinoderms collected by the Albatross among the Hawaiian Islands in 1902;
with the greatest liberality he offered me the crinoids of the collections for exami-
nation in connection with my other Pacific material.
To Dr. Hubert Lyman Clark, of the Museum of Comparative Zodlogy at Cam-
bridge, Massachusetts, had been assigned a large collection of crinoids from Japan
and eastern Asia brought together by the Albatross in 1900, and this he most courte-
ously offered me to supplement the 1906 collections from the same locality.
The Japanese collections which I had seen up to this time had all been from
comparatively deep water, and certain species, long known as inhabitants of the
coasts of that country, were conspicuously absent. Mr. Frank Springer, however,
realizing the situation, most generously purchased and deposited in the United
States National Museum the entire collection made during years of investigation of
the marine fauna off southern Japan by Mr. Alan Owston, of Yokohama, in his yacht,
the Golden Hind.
Up to now my material had been almost entirely from the North Pacific, and
from deep water, although I had examined some of the more common littoral
species of Australia and Brazil. The absence of specimens from that great wonder-
land of marine zodlogy, the East Indian Archipelago, was keenly felt as a great
handicap. But Dr. Theodor Mortensen, of Copenhagen, Denmark, understanding
my predicament, with the greatest generosity offered me the entire magnificent
collection under his charge, a collection doubly interesting in having been previ-
ously examined both by Prof. C. F. Liitken and Dr. P. H. Carpenter. Most of the
specimens were from the eastern tropics, many of them having been collected by the
Danish consul at Singapore, Mr. Svend Gad; notwithstanding all the Japanese
material I had previously studied I found no less than six new species from that
country; altogether it formed an invaluable supplement to the Pacific material
already at hand.
Shortly after I received the Copenhagen collections, Drs. W. Weltner and R.
Hartmeyer, of Berlin, at the instigation of Dr. Th. Studer, of Berne, sent me the
collection made by the German steamer Gazelle in northwestern Australia, hitherto
an unknown territory so far as regards its crinoid fauna. This collection had been
examined by Dr. P. H. Carpenter, and most of the specimens had been tentatively
identified, but he had been unable to complete a report upon it before his death.
Mr. Owen Bryant had been conducting dredging operations along the coast of
Labrador and had collected some crinoids there, which he very kindly turned over
to me.
The great area occupied by the Indian Ocean had hitherto remained almost a
blank in so far as our knowledge of its crinoidal inhabitants was concerned; a few
specimens had been noted from the Mergui Archipelago, the Andamans, Ceylon, the
Red Sea and Mauritius, with one or two, usually more or less doubtful, additional
records. I was therefore delighted when Dr. N. Annandale, of the Indian Museum,
at the instigation of Dr. F. A. Bather, of the British Museum, offered me for study
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRIN OIDS. 3
the entire collection brought together by the Royal Indian Marine Surveying steamer
Investigator, as well as the other collections belonging to the Indian Museum, collec-
tions remarkable for their unusual completeness.
The large and extensive collections of West Indian crinoids made by the ships
of the United States Bureau of Fisheries and deposited in the United States National
Museum were now studied in connection with the East Indian material, having been
up to this time laid aside awaiting the publication of the report upon the Blake
collection of 187879 by Dr. Clemens Hartlaub.
The Berlin Museum, through Drs. W. Weltner and R. Hartmeyer, now submitted
to me their entire crinoid collection, an act of courtesy the importance of which to
me can only be realized when it is remembered that this collection contains the types
of very many of the species described by Prof. Johannes Miller and by Dr. Clemens
Hartlaub; and Doctor Mortensen sent me a magnificent collection of Arctic material,
undoubtedly the finest in existence, together with the specimens which he himself
had collected while in the West Indies. :
At this time the Australian Museum, through Dr. Robert Etheridge, jr., its
curator, sent me for study their entire collection of Australian crinoids, numbering
nearly one thousand specimens.
The Albatross was now engaged in an exhaustive survey of the marine resources
of the Philippine Islands, and the crinoids which she obtained were, as fast as they
accumulated, turned over to me by the Bureau of Fisheries.
Two summers were spent at the Museum of Comparative Zodlogy at Cam-
bridge, Massachusetts, working in the library and studying the fine collections of
crinoids there, which are especially important in containing a number of species
from the Challenger dredgings, named by P. H. Carpenter. Every courtesy Was
extended to me, and I was very materially assisted in my work by Mr. Alexander
Agassiz, the director of the University Museums, Mr. Samuel Henshaw, the Curator
of the Museum of Comparative Zoélogy, and by Dr. Hubert Lyman Clark, the
assistant in whose care is the collection of echinoderms. I was also fortunate in
having the constant companionship and friendly advice of Prof. Robert Tracy
Jackson, of Harvard College, who was at that time engaged in the preparation of
his monograph of the palxozoic echinoids.
The collections and library of the Boston Society of Natural History were fre-
quently consulted, for which privilege I am indebted to Dr. Glover Morrill Allen
and to Mr. Charles W. Johnson. I also visited the Peabody Museum at Yale
University, New Haven, Connecticut, where I enjoyed the advantage of reviewing
the material with Prof. Addison FE. Verrill; and the museum of the Essex Institute
at Salem, Massachusetts, of which Prof. Edward S. Morse is the director.
During the summer of 1910 I spent four months in Europe studying the collec-
tions in the various museums, paying particular attention to the types of previous
authors; I visited Bergen, Christiania, Stockholm, Copenhagen, London, Leyden,
Brussels, Paris, Lyons, Berlin, Hamburg, Dresden, Prague, Vienna, Graz, Monaco,
Genoa and Naples.
After my return to Washington the Copenhagen Museum most kindly sent to
me the large and important Ingolf collection; the Berlin Museum, through Pro-
4 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
fessors Déderlein and Vanhéffen, sent me the antarctic collections brought together
by the Gauss; Prof. F. Doflein, through Prof. Déderlein, sent me his east Asiatic
material, and, through the courtesy of Professors Kcehler, Max Weber and Vaney,
the Siboga collection of unstalked crinoids was also assigned to me for study. More
recently, thanks to the kindness of Prof. Bernard H. Woodward and Mr. Wilfrid B.
Alexander, of the Western Australian Museum and Art Gallery, at Perth, I have
been enabled to examine the crinoids collected off the coast of southwestern
Australia by the Australian steamer Endeavour. ,
Thus in the preparation of this report I have met with the most cordia] coép-
eration from all sides. Thanks to the great generosity of all my colleagues I have
been enabled to assemble in one place and to compare directly one with another
many thousands of specimens of recent crinoids, far more than ever were previously
reviewed by any one individual, including examples of practically every known
species and a large proportion of the existing types. This material has in many
cases been ample for the determination of such questions as the scope of individual
and of specific variation, and for the accurate delimitation of species, factors of
the greatest importance in the study of all animal groups, but impossible satisfac- °
torily to determine except under the most favorable conditions.
While the present work is a complete monograph of the crinoids living at the
present day, based upon the material preserved in practically all of the more impor-
tant museums of the world, it is equally a catalogue of the crinoids of the United
States National Museum, for my colleagues have been so kind as to permit me to
retain duplicates from the collections under their care which I have examined, so
that the collection of the United States National Museum now includes, in addition
to the very rich material gathered by the vessels of the Bureau of Fisheries, particu-
larly by the Albatross and Fish Hawk, and received from other governmental
sources, a very large number of specimens, representing numerous species. received
as donations from other similar institutions.
GENERAL METHOD OF TREATMENT.
The general method of treatment herein adopted differs in certain important
respects from that employed by my distinguished predecessor and by all the other
students of this group.
The study of the crinoids heretofore has invariably been approached from the
paleontological viewpoint, the recent crinoids being considered as the impoverished
and decadent remnants of a once numerous and powerful class, the last forlorn and
pitiful exponents of a dwindling phylogenetic strain.
During the 1906 cruise of the Albatross I handled tens of thousands. of speci-
mens; several times I saw the forward deck of the steamer literally buried under
several tons of individuals belonging to a species exceeding any fossil form in size;
everywhere we went we found crinoids; we dredged them at all depths. My ideas
of the comparative importance of the recent forms underwent a total change;
surely a group so abundant, even though very local and very unevenly distributed
over the sea floor, can not be considered as decadent or degenerate. From my
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 5
observations at sea I became convinced that the recent crinoids are in every way as
much of a factor in the present day marine biology, and play fully as important a
part, as the echinoids, the holothurians, or the asteroids; cecologically they are more
interesting than any of these because of their sessile mode of *life and curiously
specialized method of procuring food.
I believe that the small importance hitherto attached to the crinoids as recent
animals in comparison with the other echinoderms has arisen from three causes:
(1) The extraordinary completeness of the palzontological record; this has its
origin in the fact that the crinoids exceed almost all other animals in their adapt-
ability to fossilization; their organization includes a very large percentage of lime
and other inorganic materials, and there are no soft bodied forms among them. it
is to be expected, then, that fossil erinoids will be exceedingly numerous, and wil
include a far greater variety of diverse types than the fossil representatives of the
other echinoderm groups, and therefore will appear greatly to have exceeded in the
past in numbers, variety, and general importance the echinoids, asteroids, ophiu-
roids or holothurians; while at the same time this splendid palzontological record
will tend to blind one to the true importance of the recent representatives and
to cause them to appear, in comparison with the recent representatives of the
other classes, relatively insignificant; (2) the small number of species hitherto
known; the majority of the specimens collected have slipped unheralded into
museums; very few investigators have cared to cope with the many difficulties
presented by their study, and so the proportionate number of known forms has
been allowed to fall far behind those known in the other groups, not because they
are really so very much fewer, but because of the much less general interest which
they have excited; were the crinoids as enthusiastically studied as the echinoids,
ophiuroids, asteroids or holothurians, we should have a wealth of records and of
described forms comparing far more favorably with what we find on consulting the
literature on those animals; (3) the paucity or absence of accessible species along
the shores of the countries where the greatest interest in zoology is taken; one
can not expect that a young investigator will devote himself with enthusiasm to
the study of a group represented on his shores by one more or less rare or local
species as in Europe, or by none at all which are accessible to him as in America,
when the representatives of other groups are rich both in number and in species;
were the shores of Europe or America as well stocked with littoral crinoids as are
those of Borneo or Celebes, I have no doubt that our knowledge of the crinoids
would be far in advance of what it is to-day; the semiprofessional zoologist as a
rule pursues in foreign lands mainly animals in which he has become interested at
home through the study of his own local fauna; animals of classes strange to him,
especially if difficult to preserve, are of only incidental interest; therefore he.gen-
erally, if he has a leaning toward marine zodlogy, gathers up corals, shells, urchins
or starfish, together with the more tenacious ophiuroids, not attempting to save
the more brittle species of the latter or the very brittle crinoids.
Firmly believing, therefore, that the recent crinoids are in no way less important
than the recent representatives of the echinoids, asteroids, ophiuroids or holothu-
rians, and in spite of their remarkably complete paleontological record, I have thought
6 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
it advisable to approach them in a somewhat different way from that which has
usually been adopted, in order the more strongly to bring out many points which
are obvious enough if the crinoids are considered as recent animals, but which are
greatly obscured if one attempts to consider both the recent and the fossil forms
together.
This somewhat radical treatment emphasizes some very interesting facts in a
way not possible by any other method, and sheds an entirely new light upon many
complex problems. Moreover, the results are strictly comparable with the results
deduced from the data gathered from a study of other recent groups; a line of
investigation may be followed up with the certainty that one is not liable to mistake a
very highly specialized for a very primitive structure or type. Comparative
anatomy may be employed as an aid in systematic work, so that conclusions do not
have to be based upon the skeletal system alone; and, most of important of all, the
crinoids in their relations to the other echinoderms and to other marine organisms
stand forth in their true light, quite devoid of the false prestige which has hitherto
been theirs as a natural result of their magnificent paleontological record, a record
which is not surpassed by that of any other marine organisms, and is approached
only by one or two restricted groups.
The strongest argument which can be made against this method of treatment
is that questions of phylogeny are entirely divorced from any possible solution by
the study of chronogenesis, but it seems to me that a phylogeny grafted upon a
chronogeny.is a very unsatisfactory structure unless one is certain that the chrono-
genesis represents, as of course it should, the true phylogenetic development.
When any group of a class of animals adopts a mode of life entirely different
from that of all of the other members of the same class we must be prepared to
encounter and to discount extraordinary, sudden, and unexpected changes in the
organization which are not connected with the ancestral type of organization by any
intermediate stages. Among such animals we almost always find the group char-
acters developed in a most erratic manner. Some structures will be very highly
specialized, sometime specialized far beyond what is seen in any other member of
the class, while others will be in a very rudimentary or primitive state of develop-
ment, or perhaps even absent altogether.
The echinoderms differ very abruptly from the crustacean line of descent from
which they took their origin, and similarly each of the echinoderm groups differs
abruptly from each of the others.
We see in the echinoderms to-day most perplexing combinations of primitive
and highly specialized characters associated in all sorts of ways, and this leads
naturally to the assumption that there was no definite intergrading form between
the echinoderms and the barnacles, which, of all the crustacea, approach them most
closely, but that the former sprang from the phylogenetic line, which may by easy
stages be traced to the latter, by a broad saltation in which the assumption of the
free habit (subsequently modified in the Pelmatozoa) and the correlated assumption
of pentamerous symmetry combined to make the existence of intergrading forms
impossible, while at the same time it resulted in the formation at the very moment
of their origin of two diverse stocks, the heteroradiate (including the Pelmatozoa,
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 7
the Echinoidea, and the Holothuroidea) and the astroradiate (including the
Asteroidea and the Ophiuroidea) between which there are, and can be, no interme-
diates.
Thus it is evident that we must use the very greatest care in the correlation of
the chronogeny and the phylogeny of the echinoderms, and we must be continually
on the watch for sudden and aberrant deviations and specializations in the older as
well as in the more recent types. A detailed study of the living types will furnish
the key to many such deviations, and this subsequently will enable us correctly to
interpret the complicated morphology of the extinct species.
As nearly as I can see there is comparatively little of value to be learned in the
first instance from the paleontological record of the echinoderms, at least in so far
as their comparative morphology and phylogeny is concerned, which can not be
learned just as well, or even better, from a study of the recent forms alone, though
the fossils furnish invaluable confirmatory evidence of the truth of any conclusions
which we may reach.
If we acquire our facts from a study of the comparative anatomy, morphology
and development of the recent types and then test them by reference to the extinct
series, it seems to me that we can build up eventually a logical phylogenetic sequence
of types of progressively increasing specialization and perfection which will be able
to withstand all the attacks which may be made upon it.
Of the many and varied recent forms there is abundant material, and this
material is always susceptible of detailed study. Furthermore, all of the recent
types are interconnected by readily demonstrable phylogenetic lines with all the
others.
On the other hand, among the fossils really good and satisfactory specimens are
rare, and there are many interesting forms which we are not able, on paleontological
evidence alone, to connect in a truly satisfactory manner with related types.
In treating of the interrelationships of the various echinoderm groups it will
be noticed that I have not taken the larvee into consideration. The larvee of the
echinoderms are very highly specialized creatures, specialized for a mode of life
entirely different from that of the adults, and hence specialized in an entirely different
way. To all intents and purposes they are organisms of a different class entirely.
Moreover, they are not all specialized in the same direction, and hence are not
strictly comparable among themselves. Mechanical considerations of form make
comparison between the barrel-shaped larva of Antedon, the bipinnaria of Asterias,
the auricularia of Holothuria, and the plutei of Ophiura or of Echinus hazardous
and unsatisfactory.
A true comparison between the species of the several echinoderm groups is only
possible upon the attainment of the adult form, or at the earliest at the inception
of the pentamerous symmetry. However suggestive and instructive the larvee may
be, they must be treated quite separately from the adults, as a distinct class of ani-
mals, or trouble is sure to result.
In this respect I consider the echinoderms as a whole precisely comparable to
those insects and crustaceans which undergo a complete metamorphosis, though in
8 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
the echinoderms the ease is much more complicated than in the insects and crusta-
ceans on account of the difference in symmetry between the young and the adults.
Sir Wyville Thomson long ago recognized this fact, that in tracing out the life
history of the echinoderms we are apparently dealing with two distinct organisms,
each apparently presenting all the essentials of a perfect animal, as had W.9K.
Carpenter before him, but succeeding authors have shown a tendency to disregard
their warnings.
On account of the curiously aberrant and sudden differentiation of the echino-
derms as a whole, and similarly of each of the constituent classes of the group, we
can never hope to ascertain the true interrelationships either of the echinoderms and
other animals, or of the several constituent classes of the echinoderms, by any direct
method of comparison.
The ancestral characters have become so modified by the adoption of radial
symmetry, and the bilateral young have become so specialized, that any direct com-
parison which is at all conclusive has now become impossible.
We must therefore approach the problem by an indirect method, by the adop-
tion of hypotheses which will logically explain all the facts presented and will cover
all the data which we are able to accumulate, but which are not primarily the direct
and indisputable resultants attained by the correlation of these facts and data.
SYNONYMY.
The synonymy of the recent crinoids was in a decidedly tangled condition,
having been only partially elucidated by Carpenter, as he did not discuss in detail
any but the species collected by the Challenger. I therefore found it necessary to
enter into this phase of the subject somewhat deeply, especially in view of the fact
that the group contained a disproportionately large number of floating names—
nomina nuda and unidentifiable supposed species—which it was very desirable to
allocate if possible. I have attempted to bring together all the references to each
species that I could find, in the hope that future workers will be spared the formid-
able task of having again to review the enormous mass of literature. The synony-
mies given are, I believe, reasonably complete, though numerous notices of species
not here included will doubtless come to light in the future. The citations have,
with very few exceptions, been personally verified, and may be taken as representing
the works consulted in the preparation of this monograph.
SYSTEMATIC TREATMENT.
In the ease of the comatulids it has been found necessary to multiply by about
a dozen times the number of genera previously allowed, and to create numerous
new families and higher groups. This was the unavoidable result of the discovery
of a vast number of new species, throwing a radically different light upon the inter-
relationships of the various forms.
The different species of comatulids vary very greatly in the number and obvious-
ness of the characters by which they are separable from closely related species; two
species, perfectly distinct, may be separable only by a small minority of what are
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 9
commonly considered their specific characters, while two others may have only a
small minority in common; and, as in other animals, characters perfectly reliable
in one group are more or less unreliable, or even perfectly worthless, in another.
Species may be found of all grades of differentiation, from a very small minority of
their characters to complete separation, but usually they fall into two classes: (1)
those separable from related species by a minority of their characters, the remainder
being held in common, and (2) those separable in all their characters. The first
division is in reality, of course, arbitrary, for it is undoubtedly true that any two
species will be found to be always separable in all their characters, provided we
devote a sufficient amount of study to them; it might better be worded ‘‘those
separable from related species by a majority of the characters commonly employed
in specific diagnosis.”
It is usually found that a number of species differentiated according to the first
rule form a circumscribed unit the sum of the diversity of all the characters in which
does not overlap the sum of the diversity of all the characters in any other similar unit,
the assemblage of forms differentiated under the first rule thus coming as a whole under
the second rule. These sharply circumscribed units, as well as species falling within
the limits of the second rule, I have considered as representing valid genera, while
forms not separated from related forms by the sum of all their characters I have
regarded as species. All species agreeing in the majority of their characters as
employed in systematic diagnoses I have considered as congeneric.
Now a number of species may, according to this ruling, be strictly congeneric,
yet they may be united into several groups by a sharply defined single character
which is common to, and exactly similar in, several species, and is not found outside
of those species. These groups within the genus I have considered worthy of sub-
generic rank. Similarly, subgenera may be differentiated into distinct specific
groups, though usually this differentiation is, as would be expected, less apparent.
In the separation of the families and of the subfamilies as well as of the higher units
the same idea has been followed, but characters of a more fundamental nature, and
therefore not sufficiently plastic to be of service in the differentiation of genera and
species, have been employed.
As in all other groups of animals the various crinoid species are of very differ-
ent relative value. In some (mostly the more highly multibrachiate oligophreate)
genera if any one character whereby the species are commonly differentiated be
plotted on a species curve, the several species will be found to be indicated not by
a series of separate triangles, but by a succession of more or less marked nodes which
are united to the mass forming the adjacent nodes by coalesced bases in thickness
equal to from 10 to 60 per cent or more of the maximum height of the neighboring
nodes. Such variability and lack of absolute fixity in any one character is as a
rule reflected in all the characters, and thus there results a species group or genus
which may be compared to a small mountain system rising out of a plain, each
peak of which represents the separate species.
In such a genus every systematic character varies between two extremes,
but there is often no correlation whatever between the different characters. Thus
79146°—Bull. 82—15_—2
10 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
every sort of combination is possible, and a very large variety is found, though the
tendency is for the characters to form more or less definitely correlated groupings,
and to crystallize into certain definite types.
In other genera (mainly macrophreate) all the characters are more definitely
correlated with each other, and then the nodes on the species curve will be found
to be very sharp and almost or entirely distinct from each other, the various species
indicated exhibiting little or no tendency toward intergradation.
This type of variability is not connected with the geographical origin of the
specimens except in a very general way, and therefore the several forms can not be
considered as subspecies as that term is commonly understood. It is practically
confined to the multibrachiate Oligophreata, and to specimens of oligophreate
species from the East Indian region. These same species when extending their
range outside of this region gradually become more fixed and definite in their
characters, so that individuals from, for example, Madagascar or southern Japan
will all be found to be practically uniform in their various features, and to represent
the mean of the two extremes seen in a series from the central East Indian region.
The recent representatives of a few families appear to have suddenly deviated
from any type which we might reconstruct as the phylogenetic stock whence they
had been derived by a process of ‘‘explosion”’ of their characters which have become
recombined in a curiously unbalanced manner, exactly as we see to be the case in
several fossil groups. A tendency to form an explosive or very aberrant offshoot
is more or less evident in every group of animals, but it rarely affects more than a
small minority of the genera or of the species.
An earnest effort has been made to avoid the common error of taking into
account only obvious differential characters, thereby becoming blinded to the less
obvious, but often more reliable, systematic features, by carefully examining every
detail of the animal and every point offered by its structure apart from all the
others, though in many cases, so far as regards comparative descriptive work,
no use has subsequently been found for the data acquired.
Great care has been used in the selection of new generic names, and especially
in the selection of the types of new genera; the types are, whenever possible, the
first species to have been described, and the commonest species; but in cases where
the original description is deficient or the identification doubtful I have taken one
of the later species, where circumstances permitted one considered as a synonym of
the first. Preference has always been given to species at hand to guard against the
possibility of nomenclatorial disturbance through misconception of species not
personally known to me.
EMBRYOLOGY, DEVELOPMENT AND ANATOMY.
The systematic study of the comatulids is, no less than that of other groups,
based largely upon a knowledge of the development and of the external and internal
anatomy; the comatulids, through uniformity of habit, are all built upon the same
general plan, and hence the knowledge of their development and anatomy must
be comparatively exhaustive in order that the systematic differentiation, at first
sight apparently very slight, may properly be appreciated, when it becomes obvious
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 11
that the differences, trifling though they may seem, are really fundamental and
valid.
Students of bilaterally symmetrical animals, especially those animals endowed
with powers of locomotion, are accustomed to a relatively large coéfficient of specific
differentiation; this is true even among other groups of echinoderms in which the
individuals lead a more or less bilaterally active life. Also among radially sym-
metrical animals which move actively about specific differentiation is usually more
marked than among those of sedentary habits.
The difficulty of at first comprehending the comatulid characters is a difficulty
of comparative perception, not of fact, and is entirely due to a superficial similarity
in the gross anatomy and form.
One can never tell without a most detailed inquiry what are good systematic
characters and what are not; the most obscure anatomical features often prove to
be of the greatest interest, while in the embryology even such points as the unequal
division of the ovum, as well as the absence in certain cases of the anterior tuft of
cilia, and the difference in size of the cells at the animal and vegetative poles of the
blastosphere, appear to be of specific significance.
It is very important that systematists should consider all these points of
apparent difference, especially those which loom up large in the embryo but which
disappear more or less in the adults; it is also important that embryologists and
anatomists, aroused to a high pitch of enthusiasm over the discovery of certain
peculiarities in their material not previously noticed, should not be led either into
condemning the work of their predecessors as careless, or into arguing, from a wide
anatomical difference between two forms, a correspondingly wide systematic
difference.
It is a common fault in works of monographic scope to magnify the systematic
side of the subject to the great detriment of the morphological; but a thorough
understanding of the anatomy and development of the animals of any group is
absolutely essential before the systematic aspect can be intelligently studied.
Diverse interpretations of different structures or organs by several authors have
often led to corresponding variations in their systematic treatment, variations
which have been difficult to appreciate in their true proportions, because of neglect
to explain in advance the position taken.
As a general rule systematists are inclined to attach altogether too little impor-
tance to anatomical or embryological features, and morphologists altogether too
much. For instance, P. H. Carpenter, as a systematist, passed lightly over the
peculiarities of the brachial muscles in different forms, while as a morphologist he
greatly exaggerated the importance of interradials in the genus Thawmatocrinus.
I have been able to add but little to what has been done by previous workers in
the field of development and anatomy; but it is essential that these be explained
in some detail before the systematic treatment can be commenced. Instead of
giving an account of these phases of the subject taken from a comparative study of
the works of others, I have preferred to quote more or less directly from the leading
authors on the various points considered, giving full credit to them, and thus mak-
ing a far more satisfactory whole, No attempt is herein made to give an exhaustive
12 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
account of the anatomy and embryology of the crinoids, but it is hoped that these
points are treated in sufficient detail so that their systematic significance may be
appreciated.
The account of the embryology and of the anatomy of the various forms is
taken from the latest and most authoritative works, and will be found to be sufficient
for the systematic side of the subject; but it must be emphasized that the extracts
given are not intended to be, and are not, sufficient to serve as a basis for anatomical
or embryological work, and for such work the original papers, which contain much
more than the extracts included here, must be used, as especial care has been taken
in order that the information herein given shall not detract in any way from the
demand for the original papers by providing an easily accessible transcript of the
subject matter or of the figures.
Methods of microscopical technique are obviously out of place in a systematic
work devoted to animals of comparatively large size, and, therefore, are in all cases
omitted; they are, however, given in great detail by the authors cited.
Accounts of obscure anatomical or histological points, or discussions with no
systematic bearing, are omitted; this includes the discussion of doubtful structures;
information in regard to these may be found in abundance in the original papers.
The information here given is, it may be again stated, included for systematic work,
and from a systematic point of view, only.
A large amount of exceedingly interesting work has been done on the larval
and anatomical homologies of the various echinoderm groups, resulting in a con-
siderable diversity of opinion in regard to their interrelationships, and in much
speculation as to their common origin and to the original echinodermal prototype.
While it is difficult to avoid discussing these matters afresh, it has seemed best to
omit reference to them in a work devoted solely to the crinoids, and to only a lim-
ited group of the species of that class. The only question that can be of any impor-
tance is that of the relationship between the crinoids and the most closely allied
classes, and this will be considered at some length.
VARIANTS AND ABERRANTS.
It has long been recognized that a careful study of variants and aberrants often
furnishes most instructive data upon which to base a consideration of the origin and
phylogenetic significance of the different organs and members, and of an animal as a
whole. Inno group is the study of these variants more important than in the echino-
derms, and in few groups do they occur with such frequency and along such well-
marked lines of progression and retrogression as in the crinoids.
PHILOSOPHICAL CONCLUSIONS,
Many general zodélogical truths are brought out by a study of the crinoids more
forcibly than by a study of any other animals, and many others appear in the group
in a somewhat new aspect, which sheds a certain very instructive new light upon
them.
For instance, in certain genera most of the species will occupy definite and
closely circumscribed areas or depths, each different from that inhabited by any of the
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 13
others, the interrelationships being in general accordance with Jordan’s law; but
one species, always the most variable and the one occupying the position nearest the
center or general mean of the extremes of all the variable specific characters repre-
sented in the genus, will be found whose range, both geographical and bathymetrical,
is equal to the sum of the ranges of all the other species in the genus.
Again, highly specialized species commonly occupy a specialized and circum-
scribed habitat, while generalized species are found among very diverse conditions.
Among the several species in a genus the one occupying the limits of the distri-
bution of the genus as a whole is as a rule the most variable in its characters, and
similarly in individual species the coéfficient of variation among the individuals
increases in proportion to the distance from the center of distribution, primarily as
a result of existence under progressively increasing unfavorable or semipathological
conditions.
There is a more or less apparent curious and significant exception to this rule,
however, for the center of distribution of a large group—and the truth of the obser-
vation is, as a rule, greatly increased in proportion to the size and importance of
the group—is marked by a most remarkable diversity in the individual, specific,
and generic characters of the organisms inhabiting the locality. This is the result
of an increase in the number of variants under optimum conditions—a kind of
incipient species formation—and has no relation to the more or less pathological
type of variation seen along the outer edge of the habitat of a species or of a genus.
Association of species of a single genus or of related genera in pairs, each occu-
pying nearly or quite the same geographical and bathymetrical ranges, has fre-
quently been reported, cases occurring in most of the animal groups, and instances
of it appear among the crinoids. Some of these cases are at once explained by the
difference in the breeding seasons of the associated forms which effectually prevents
any hybridization; but others are not quite so simple, although they may be
accounted for in various other ways.
Not only are the crinoids plant-like in appearance and in the manner of their
existence, but some of them have, along with this curious superficial similarity,
acquired a more or less close correspondence in the comparative interrelationships
of their various systematic characters, just as have many of the arborescent marine
organisms.
The degree of stability of the generic and specific characters and of the corre-
lation of the characters presented by the several sets of structures and organs among
the comatulids is, broadly speaking, inversely proportionate to the fixity of habit
of the adults, and therefore in general to the number of arms possessed by the adults.
In such groups as the Antedoninz, where the animals are more or less active and are
capable of swimming about, the generic and specific characters and the character
correlations are, as a rule, strongly marked and readily defined. Such specific or
generic intergradation as occurs (and specific and generic intergradation is by no
means uncommon) takes the form of a gradual and uniform change in all the char-
acters whereby exactly the same balance of correlation is at all times maintained;
but in the highly multibrachiate groups in which the musculature in the proximal
portion of the arm is greatly reduced, especially in those groups which are highly
14 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
specialized and possess division series of 4(3+4) instead of the more primitive 2,
character correlations are unstable and uncertain and are liable to sudden and ex-
iraordinary deviations from the normal, resulting in all sorts of grotesque mixtures,
not only within a family or genus but even within a group of specimens of the same
species from the same locality.
Thus, among the highly multibrachiate comasterids individual specimens of a
single species may exhibit, more or less well developed, the essential features of
entirely different genera from the one to which they really belong. For instance,
examples of Capillaster multiradiata are not uncommon with nearly or quite half
of their arms of the type characteristic of the species of Comatella, while examples
of Comanthus bennetti are recorded which possess the arm structure of the species
of Comanthina and others which possess that of the species of Comantheria; con-
versely, specimens of Comanthina schlegelii not infrequently exhibit the arm
structure characteristic of Comanthus bennetti.
This shows the necessity for the utmost caution in determining the genus or
species of specimens of the highly multibrachiate forms (especially when some or
all of the division series are 4[3 +4]), and of specimens of 10-armed forms belonging
to highly multibrachiate groups. Each individual must be critically examined
not only in respect to the essential features of the group as commonly understood,
but also in regard to all of the minor features, for it is sometimes found that the
character upon which most stress is ordinarily (and properly) laid is in part or
even in its entirety replaced by the character normally diagnostic of an entirely
different species or even genus.
The recurrence of nearly or quite identical types of arms, centrodorsals, cirri,
pinnules, disks, and other organs in widely different groups raises the question
whether such recurrence is really the sporadic reappearance of fixed and definite
structural types or whether it may not be merely the result of parallelism.
Now parallelism is the convergence toward a common type of fundamentally
different structures or organs. This convergence progresses far enough to satisfy
the requirements of the impelling physical, chemical, mechanical, or economic
factors, but no further; hence, though two radically different structures or organs
may through parallelism be rendered superficially very similar, the modification
is never carried far enough entirely to conceal their ultimate diverse origins.
In the comatulids identical types of organs and identical structural types,
which, as in the case of the method of arm division, are sometimes quite complex,
reappear in widely different groups, in each of which they pass through the same
developmental history, but in each of which they are associated with other organs
and structures of phylogenetically and developmentally entirely and fundamentally
different values which are combined in each case in a radically different way. Such
could scarcely be the case were we dealing with structural modifications resulting
purely from mechanical, economic, or other exigencies, for we can scarcely imagine
parallelisms either to be so erratic in their manifestations and to be in one structure
or organ so entirely dissociated from correlated effects upon other structures or
organs, or to show, no matter where they appear, the same course of development.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 15
The general absence of correlation between the several sets of organs and struc-
tures which collectively make up the comatulid whole most emphatically negatives
the idea that the occurrence of the same structural type in widely different groups
is the result of parallelism, and indicates that among the comatulids as a class
there is a given number of more or less distinct and independent types of each organ
and structure, any one of which may be combined with any one of the types of the
other organs and structures.
RELATIVE STATUS OF THE RECENT CRINOIDS.
Since the crinoids are the most nearly strictly sessile of all the animals in the
sea, and since their relation to their food supply is always essentially the same
no matter what diversity there may be in the chemical and physical nature of their
surroundings, the facts furnished by a study of the geographical and bathymetrical
distribution of the recent crinoids are of the greatest value in the determination of
former land connections, just as the facts brought out by a study of the fossil repre-
sentatives of the recent genera and species are of the greatest importance in tracing
out the extent and time of existence of the ancient seas.
The remarkable paleontological record of the crinoids, and the abundance of
fossil forms closely related to existing genera and species, will allow of an accurate
estimate in regard to the geological time when these land connections were estab-
lished, and when they became disrupted.
A comparative study of the recent faunas and those of past ages will show at
what epoch certain land areas and certain deep channels were formed, as a result of
which genera of subsequent origin were unable to spread into territory previously
colonized by older forms; while at the same time it will throw much light on the
geological age of the components of the deep sea fauna, showing that it is a complex
formed of representatives of all the most virile types which have existed in all of the
past horizons.
By a careful study of the chemical and physical conditions under which the
recent forms live, a determination of their relation to temperature, salinity, light,
currents, etc., we shall be able to learn much which will be of the greatest value in
ascertaining the exact conditions under which many ancient strata were laid down.
I have reserved the discussion of all these interesting points, as well as of the
distribution, ecology, geological history, and the relationships of the recent crinoids
to their fossil representatives (including the facts brought out by a comparative
study of recent and fossil species belonging to the same genera)—in other words,
the bearing of our knowledge of recent crinoids upon the data gathered from a
study of paleontology—until the end of this work, not only because the general
conclusions find their most logical place after the consideration of all the special
features and the complete presentation of all the data, but also for the reason that,
as the treatment herein adopted is such a radical departure from any treatment
heretofore proposed, and the number of new species is so very large, no general
discussion would be of value until after the systematic framework upon which it
is of necessity based has been thoroughly elucidated and made easy of comprehension.
16 BULLETIN 52, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
In the following pages there will be found much speculation in regard to the
hypothetical ancestor of the crinoids and of the echinoderms, based upon a study
of each of the various systems which, when taken together, make up the ermoid
or echinoderm whole, and a figure of the hypothetical ancestor will be found
embodying all the data acquired from this study. It is well, perhaps, to emphasize
the fact that no claim is made that such a creature ever existed; we see in all the
echinoderms to-day most perplexing combinations of primitive and highly special-
ized characters, associated in all sorts of different ways, and this leads us naturally,
as I have already stated, to the assumption that there was no definite intergrade
between the echinoderms and the barnacles, but that the former sprang from the
latter (or, more strictly speaking, from the same phylogenetic line which can be
traced by easy stages to the latter) by a broad saltation in which the assumption
of the free habit and the correlated assumption of the pentaradiate symmetry
combined to render the existence of intermediate types impossible, while at the
same time it caused the formation by the echinoderms, at the very moment of their
origin, of two widely diverse stocks, the heteroradiate, including the Pelmatozoa,
the Echinoidea, and the Holothuroidea, and the astroradiate, including the Asteroidea
and the Ophiuroidea, between which there are, and can be, no intergrades.
The comatulids must therefore be considered as a biologically extremely com-
plex and mixed group in which each organ and structure occurs in a single series
all the way from a primitive to a highly specialized type, but in which the various
degrees of specialization of each organ or structure, in other words, the progressive
steps in the series, as not in any way correlated with species or with genera, or with
the comparable degrees of specialization of any other organ or structure.
Thus it is at once evident that there is a most extraordinary uniformity
throughout all the comatulid families and genera, and that each is potentially on
essentially the same phylogenetic plane as are all of the others.
The comatulids as a group are exactly parallel and comparable to the penta-
crinites as a group; they are descended from the same ancestral stock and represent
exactly the same phylogenetic stage, but durmg their development they have
diverged from their phylogenetic mean in exactly the opposite direction. The
pentacrinites have departed widely from their prototypes by enormously increasing
the length of the column and at the same time indefinitely reduplicating the cirrifer-
ous proximale, a departure which has to a considerable degree lessened the mobility
of the crown, this being in part compensated by a corresponding increase in the length
of the arms; while the comatulids have departed just as widely by compressing
what is virtually the entire column of the pentacrinites within the compass of the
single proximale or nodal from which numerous cirri are extruded, fixation by these
cirri reducing the possibility of motion by the crown to a minimum so that under
ordinary conditions the animals are almost as firmly attached as is Holopus.
As the greater part of the enormously elongated stem of the pentacrinites lies
on the sea floor and therefore becomes neutral in its relation to the mechanics of the
animals, these forms do not exhibit any very radical departure from a more gener-
alized type, such differences as they show being chiefly the result of the very large
size of the crown and arms correlated with a reduction in size of the calyx; nor do
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 17
they exhibit any strong tendency toward dissociation of ordinarily correlated char-
acters; but the sudden and much more abrupt departure from the normal crinoid
habit seen in the comatulids has been accompanied by, or the entirely new conditions
under which they live and the consequent extraordinary atrophy of their calyx have
induced, the development of all sorts of structural variants and excesses which have
not yet had time or, because of the passive part the animals play in their relations
to other animals, have not yet been forced, to crystallize to definite types with a
definite scheme of correlation.
The morphological difference between the pentacrinites and the comatulids is
merely that the weakening of the syzygial union between the first nodal formed
and the infranodal just below it in the comatulids leads to its rupture before any
additional segments are formed, while in the pentacrinites rupture does not occur
until many other columnars have been intercalated between this nodal and the
calyx. The pentacrinites thus continue to build a long, many-jointed stem, while
the comatulids condense the entire stem within the compass of the first-formed
nodal. The morphological difference between the comatulids and the pentacrinites
reduced to its lowest terms therefore is merely a slight difference in the develop-
ment of the tendency to rupture at the syzygy between the first-formed nodal and
the columnar just beneath it.
The comatulids and the pentacrinites occupy a curiously anomalous system-
atic position, for both groups are far removed from the direct line representing the
progressive phylogenetical development of the class. But both, though widely
divergent, agree in differing from all other related types through discarding the proxi-
mal portion of the column and in the development of a highly cirriferous proximale,
which in the pentacrinites is indefinitely reduplicated.
The genus Thiolliericrinus occupies a position midway between them; species
of this genus develop a cirriferous proximale, but retain the larval column; the
relation of Thiolliericrinus to the pentacrinites and to the comatulids may roughly
be graphically expressed by the followmg formula:
pentacrinites + comatulids
9
= Thiolliericrinus.
Thiolliericrinus, however, is in the direct line representing the progressive
phylogenetical development of the class, and approximates very closely, if it does
not actually represent, the type from which, by sudden diametrically opposite
deviation, both the pentacrinites and the comatulids have been derived.
Systematically the pentacrinites, Thiolliericrinus and the comatulids repre-
sent a small group of which Thiolliericrinus is the true phylogenetical exponent, the
other two types being aberrant departures from this stock.
Thiollericrinus is fossil only. In the recent seas the comatulids far outnumber
all of the other crinoids taken together, at the same time extending through a much
wider geographical, bathymetrical and thermal range, while by far the largest of
the remaining groups is that of the pentacrinites.
These two highly aberrant types therefore dominate the recent seas, and so
pronounced is their dominance that when compared with them all the other types
become relatively insignificant.
18 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
The comatulids alone in their numbers, in the diversity of their habitat, and
in the complexity of their systematic interrelationships are in the present seas
the strict systematic equivalent of each of the other classes of echinoderms. Of
themselves they form what is unmistakably a class, with all the distinctive systematic
features of a true class.
Thus the comatulids, in reality only an insignificant and aberrant offshoot from
the general phylogenetic crinoidal line, represent in their relationships to the other
organisms of the seas of the present day a true class, exhibiting the curious anomaly
of a group which, considered from one point of view is a true class, but considered
from another point of view does not even rise to the dignity of a subfamily.
ILLUSTRATIONS.
A very considerable amount of time and thought has been expended in attempt-.
ing to solve the problem of how best to illustrate the various species of comatulids.
These animals differ but slightly in their general build, though very greatly in the
finer details of their structure.
In the Challenger monograph the first serious attempt was made to portray
the comatulids in a monographic way. Although the figures are exceptionally
good, there has always been more or less difficulty in comprehending them, and I
experienced a great deal of trouble with them myself. It was not at first evident
wherein this difficulty lay. A certain inability of the artist to grasp the significance
of such details as the smooth or comparatively rugose appearance of certain speci-
mens, details exceptionally difficult of portrayal in a satisfactory manner, account
for much of the indefiniteness of certain figures, while the varied position of the
arms in the examples given make comparisons between the illustrations exceedingly
laborious, and undoubtedly accounts for the rest.
The figures in Hartlaub’s works were drawn by a different artist than were those
in the Challenger report; though excellent delineations, a certain personal element has
entered into their make-up which makes comparison between them and the Challenger
figures more or less unsatisfactory.
No personal element entered into Déderlein’s beautiful photographic repro-
ductions; yet they are as difficult to compare with the figures of Carpenter or of
Hartlaub as these are with each other. It was therefore evident that I could not
hope to produce satisfactory results by placing sole reliance either upon the artist
or upon the camera.
A study of Déderlein’s paper side by side with the Challenger report suggested
to me that if each species were drawn in detail, and a photographic reproduction
of the specimen also given, the former to show the intricate structure and the latter
to give the general appearance, a result might be attained which would stand a good
chance of being fairly satisfactory.
After a mature consideration of the matter I decided that, as photographie
plates were also to be used, there was no object in burdening the text figures with
detail; the simpler they were the more forcibly could the essential differential
characters be made to stand out. Moreover, if all the figures were rendered semi-
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 19
diagrammatic by the arbitrary arrangement of the arms in a given position, com-
parison of the figures inter se would be greatly facilitated; it would not then be
necessary to use the imagination in righting a more or less distorted picture before
comparison could be made. with another equally, but differently, distorted.
All the figures included herein have been prepared in line with these ideas,
and future workers will be able to determine whether or not they are of any value.
While the portrayal of 5 or 10 armed species which normally carry their arms
at more or less of an angle to the surface of the disk is a comparatively simple
matter, the question of how to show a multibrachiate or a flattened species without
becoming swamped in a multiplicity of detail opened up an additional series of
problems. It has seemed to me ample in the case of the flat 10-armed comasterids
to show one-fifth of the animal (two arms) in detail, including the centrodorsal
and such cirri as may be present on the side opposite the arms as drawn, and to
indicate the remaining portions by simple lines; in the case of very many armed
forms the sketching in of the arms in the additional four sectors has the effect of
diminishing the strength of the detailed sector, as well as by increasing the width
of the figure, necessitating a somewhat greater reduction in size than is advisable.
Only the centrai portion and one of the so-called “rays” of the multibrachiate
species are therefore shown.
In the preparation of the text figures, I was fortunate in securing the codpera-
tion of Miss Violet Dandridge, of Shepherdstown, West Virginia, whose experience
in preparing figures abounding in detail, especially of shells, fish, and ophiuroids,
formed the best possible basis for work upon the crinoids.
The photographs for the plates were made by Mr. T. W. Smillie in the photo-
graphic department of the United States National Museum.
IDENTIFICATION OF THE SPECIMENS UPON WHICH THIS WORK IS BASED.
Almost all the specimens which have been examined by the author in the
preparation of this report have been marked with a small label stating the fact,
and all are herein listed under their respective species, so that any future worker
may be able to consult, with the least possible trouble, the material upon which
all the statements and deductions herein given have been founded.
The letters following the data for each specimen indicate the collection in
which the specimens may be found, as follows:
Amer. M.: American Museum of Natural History, New York.
Austr. M.: Australian Museum, Sydney, New South Wales.
B. M.: British Museum.
Berg. M.: Bergen Museum.
Berl. M.: Museum fiir Naturkunde, Berlin.
Bata: Museum of the Boston Society of Natural History.
CoM: Zoological Museum, Copenhagen, Denmark.
eM: Dresden Museum.
1 Dare Museum of the Essex Institute, Salem, Massachusetts.
Te:
oe: Frank Springer collection.
20 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
F.S. Dep.: Frank Springer deposit collection in the United States Na-
tional Museum.
G.M.: Graz University Museum.
I. M.: Indian Museum, Caleutta, India.
K.M.: Christiania Museum.
Mie: Leyden Museum.
soe: Leland Stanford Junior University Museum.
Uys University of Liverpool Museum.
M. C. Z.: Museum of Comparative Zodlogy, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
M. M.: Museum fur Meereskunde, Berlin.
M. O.: Oceanographic Museum, Monaco.
PAY: Museum of the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences.
PeMes Paris Museum.
Be Dades Collection of Prof. Robert Tracy Jackson, of Cambridge, Mas-
sachusetts.
Beds Collection of the Naples Station.
WiCks University of California collection.
U.S. B. F., W.: Collection of the United States Bureau of Fisheries, at Woods
Hole, Massachusetts.
U.S. B. F., B.: Collection of the United States Bureau of Fisheries, at Beau-
fort, South Carolina.
We SoM: United States National Museum collection.
Vis Collection of Prof. Addison E. Verrill, of New Haven, Con-
necticut.
W.A.M.: Collection of the Western Australian Museum and Art Gal-
lery, at Perth.
Waa Vienna Museum.
Y.M.: Peabody Museum, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
INDIVIDUALS AND INSTITUTIONS TO WHICH THE AUTHOR IS INDEBTED.
There only remains the pleasant duty of expressing my gratitude and offering
my most sincere thanks to those who have so kindly aided me in my work with
information and with specimens: Mr. Alexander Agassiz, of Cambridge and New-
port; Dr. Nelson Annandale, of the Indian Museum, Calcutta; Prof. A. Appellof, of
Upsala, Sweden; Dr. F. A. Bather, of the British Museum (Natural History) ; Prof.
F. Jeffrey Bell, of the same institution; Mr. Herbert Clifton Chadwick, of Port
Erin, Isle of Man; Dr. Hubert Lyman Clark, of the Museum of Comparative Zoélogy,
Cambridge, Massachusetts; Prof. Ludwig Déderlein, of Strassburg, Germany;
Prof. Franz Doflein, of Munich, Bavaria; Dr. Robert Etheridge, of the Australian
Museum, Sydney, New South Wales; Mr. George T. Farran, of Dublin, Ireland;
Prof. Walter K. Fisher, of Stanford University, California; Prof. Theodore N. Gill,
of Washington; Dr. James A. Grieg, of Bergen, Norway; Prof. Robert Tracy Jack-
son, of Cambridge, Massachusetts; Dr. Robert Hartmeyer, of the Museum fir
Naturkunde, Berlin; Mr. Samuel Henshaw, of the Museum of Comparative Zoélogy;
Prof. W. A. Herdman, of Liverpool, England; Dr. R. Horst, of Leyden, Holland;
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 21
“
Dr. F. A. Jentink, of Leyden; Prof. L. Joubin, of the Natural History Museum, Paris;
Prof. René Keehler, of Lyon; Prof. K. Kraepelin, of the Natural History Museum,
Hamburg; Prof. Edward L. Mark, of Harvard University; Prof. W. Michaelsen, of
the Natural History Museum, Hamburg; Dr. Theodor Mortensen, of the Zodélogical
Museum, Copenhagen; Prof. Ed. Perrier, of the Natural History Museum, Paris;
Prof. G. Pfeffer, of the Natural History Museum, Hamburg; Mr. Richard Rathbun
and Miss Mary J. Rathbun, of Washington; Prof. J. Richard, of Monaco; Prof.
William E. Ritter, of the University of California; Dr. Leonhard Stejneger, of
Washington; Dr. Charles Wardell Stiles, of Washington; Prof. C. Vaney, of Lyon;
Prof. Th. Studer, of Berne, Switzerland; Prof. E. Vanhéffen, of the Museum fir
Naturkunde, Berlin; Prof. Addison E. Verrill, of Yale University, New Haven,
Connecticut; Prof. Max Weber, of Eerbeek, Holland; Prof. W. Weltner, of the
Museum fiir Naturkunde, Berlin; and Prof. Bernard H. Woodward, of Perth,
Western Australia.
To Mr. Frank Springer, of Las Vegas, New Mexico, with whom I have been in
constant communication since the beginning of the work, and who has assisted
me in every possible way, with most valuable information and with specimens, I
owe more than I can well express; it is due to his constant encouragement and
support that I was at last able to bring my studies to a conclusion.
For their kindness and courtesy in reading the proof of this volume I am deeply
indebted to Messrs. Frank Springer, William Patten, and Walter K. Fisher. All
three of these gentlemen made numerous suggestions which proved most helpful
tome. Itis only fair to them to state, however, that they are not necessarily to be
considered as agreeing with all the details of my conclusions.
HISTORY OF THE SUBJECT.
GENERAL HISTORY.
The common comatulids of the coasts of Europe (Antedon petasus, A. bifida, A.
mediterranea, and A. adriatica) were undoubtedly known, at least to fishermen, long
before any record of them appears in literature; so also it is probable that numerous
specimens of the large species from the Orient had reached Europe and found their
way into the cabinets of collectors soon after the establishment of regular trade
between Europe and the East, though they had not aroused sufficient interest to
lead to a definite announcement of the fact.
It is in 1592 that we find the first satisfactory reference to a comatulid; its
great beauty and delicacy of structure, enhanced, no doubt, by its comparative
rarity, led Fabius Columna to treat at some length of the common Mediterranean
species (dexadaovaktevoscdijc; Antedon mediterranea), and he even noticed the
interesting physiological fact that if a specimen be placed in fresh water its color-
ing matter dissolves out, imparting a hue to the water corresponding to the original
color of the individual. The remarks of Columna aroused considerable interest,
and we find them incorporated, together with a copy of his really excellent figure, in
many of the succeeding works on zodlogy.
Fossil erinoids, abundant in many localities, were widely known, and many
and curious were the speculations as to their origin; the detached columnals espe-
22 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
cially, on account of their commonly starry shape and delicate markings, had been
the objects of much superstitious awe, so that we find them figuring in the early
literature, under the names “pentacrinos,” ‘asteroites,’’ or ‘‘entrochos,” much
more frequently than the less dreadful but, as we know to-day, far more interesting
crowns.
It remained for Edward Llhuyd to first point out (in 1699 and 1703) the con-
nection between the fossil crinoids and the recent sea stars, and to go even further
and suggest the Rosy Feather Star (‘‘Decempeda cornubiensium,” i. e., Antedon
bifida) as the type of sea star to which they were most closely related. Llhuyd really
deserves far more credit than is commonly accorded him for dissipating this halo
of semi-religious mystery which surrounded the fossil crinoids, and for his great
discovery of the relationship between them and the comatulids. His excellent
work, which may almost be said to have laid the foundation for the study of the
Crinoidea, did not meet with the reception it deserved; his modest, yet convincing,
essays could not penetrate the thick wall of popular prejudice, and the comatulids
were later again assigned to the place which they had previously occupied.
In 1711 Petiver described and figured the first comatulid known from a locality
outside of Europe, calling it the “Stella chinensis perlegens”’ (Capillaster multira-
diata).
Three years later Barrelier described anew the form first noticed by Columna
under the names of barbata and fimbriata.
In 1719 Rosinus, ignorant of the work of Llhuyd, attempted to show the con-
nection between the fossil crinoids and the recent sea stars, but he selected the
basket stars (Astrophyton, etc.) as the recent forms to which the crinoids are most
nearly related, thus not advancing so far as had Llhuyd 16 years before, though in
justice to him it must be admitted that he did not have the opportunities for examin-
ing the recent comatulids which were enjoyed by Llhuyd.
In his really remarkable work upon the sea stars, published in 1733, John
Henry Linck gathered into one volume all of the facts which had been discovered
concerning the group. The comatulids he differentiated from the asteroids and
from the ophiuroids, placing them in the class ‘Stelle Crinite,’”’ or hair stars, in
which he distinguished three genera—dexdxvepoc, with three species, Tpeoxacdexdxvepoc,
with one, and Caput- Medusz, with two, as follows:
Class STELLA CRINITA.
Genus dexdxvepoc:
4. crocea (founded on the dexadasvaxtevoecdij¢ of Columna)...... Antedon mediterranea.
4. rosacea (founded on the Decempeda cornubiensium of Lihuyd).......2 Antedon bifida.
4. barbata (founded on the Stella fimbriata of Barrelier).......-- Antedon mediterranea.
Genus Tpcoxacdexdxvenog (founded on the Stella chinensis perlegens of Petiver.)
Capillaster multiradiata.
Genus Caput-Medusex:
CAOMUMMMEN BD: DOVn as dcee ec cee dee onc Omen ene eens ?Comanthus bennetti.
C. cinereum, sp. hoy.; according to Miller, Lamprometra palmata, though more likely
to be L. protectus, a species which was not differentiated from L. palmata by Miiller.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 23
The specimens of the two last, which were the only new species described by
Linck, were in the collection of Albert Seba and are now probably in the St. Peters-
burg museum.
Linck appears to have admitted the close connection shown by Llhuyd between
the comatulids and the fossil crimoids; but he had nothing to add to Lilhuyd’s lucid
exposition of the facts, so he contented himself with reprinting his dissertation as
an appendix.
In spite of the advances which had been made, the next step was a wholesale
retrogression and threw the study of the group into utter chaos; for Linné in
1758 placed the comatulids with the starfish and the ophiuroids in the genus Asterias,
recognizing only two species, both composites, and neither including any reference
to the species represented by the respective type-spectmens.
His first species is:
Asterias pectinata=Antedon bifida+ A. mediterranea + Capillaster multiradiata;
but the type-specimen (at Lund) is not even generically identical with any of these
supposed synonyms, being of the species now known as Comatula pectinata; this
discrepancy is suggested by the locality given, Indian Seas, whereas Antedon bifida
(as known to Linné) is from Cornwall, A. mediterranea from Italy, and Capillaster
multiradiata from China. We have to thank Retzius, Miiller, and P. H. Carpenter
for redescriptions of the specimen which Linné had in mind when he penned his
Asterias pectinata.
Linné’s second species is:
Asterias multiradiata=Linck’s Caput-Meduse cinereum+his C. brunnum,
the first of which is undoubtedly a Lamprometra, possibly, as Miller supposed, L.
palmata, though more likely L. protectus; the second undoubtedly one of the Comas-
teridx, possibly Comanthus bennetti. Retzius and Carpenter have shown, however,
as in the case of the preceding, that the type-specimen is generically different from
either, and Asterias (Capillaster) multiradiata has been restricted accordingly.
In 1761 the great Dutch collector, Albert Seba, figured and described two multi-
brachiate comatulids, one of which was said to have come from Mexico, but both of
which probably came from the East Indies.
In the twelfth edition of his work (1767) Linné added to the synonymy of
Asterias pectinata Seba’s Stella marinis polyactis, seu Luna marina, said to have
come from Mexico (undoubtedly a Himerometra), and his Luna marina altera
(which is probably one of the Comasteride), of unknown habitat. In 1758 out of
the five references which he cites under Asterias pectinata, four are to 10-armed
forms (Antedon) and one to a 13-armed specimen (the Stella chinensis perlegens of
Petiver); of the two additional references given in 1767, one of the figures (Stella
marinis polyactis) shows 29 arms, the other (Luna marina altera) 37. With this
heterogeneous concept in mind it is no wonder that he concludes his discussion of
Asterias multiradiata by saying that it is possibly only a variety of A. pectinata.
In 1777 Pennant restricted the Linnean Asterias pectinata by describing his
Asterias bifida and A. decacnemus, both of which, however, represent the same
24 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
species, the Decempeda cornubiensium of Lihuyd, or the Antedon bifida as now known;
and in 1783 Retzius carefully redescribed the Linnean types of Asterias pectinata
and A. multiradiata, at the same time adding to science a new species from the
American side of the Atlantic, Asterias tenella, the Hathrometra tenella of to-day.
Brugiére, in the ‘‘Encyclopedie méthodique” (1792), republished the figures of
comatulids given by previous authors.
Toward the end of the eighteenth century, Pennant, Forster, and Latham and
Davis, in the various editions of the ‘‘Faunula Indica,” included both the Linnean
species as given by that author and on his authority, bemg able to add no original
matter of their own.
Speaking solely with reference to the Linnean system of nomenclature, de
Fréminville took the first step in the recognition of the comatulids as a group dis-
tinct from the other sea stars; in a short paper published in 1811 he proposed the
genus Antedon for the common west European species (A. bifida), a specimen of
which he had found in a dry dock at Havre, adhering to the growth on a ship’s
bottom. He made no attempt to elucidate the two Linnean species, or any others
previously known, in connection with the new one he described (A. gorgonia), nor
did he go further than to show in what way it differed from the ophiuroids.
Simultaneously Lamarck had become dissatisfied with the heterogeneous
character of the Linnean genus Asterias, and in the following year (1812), in the
second volume preliminary to his great work on the invertebrates, he suggested the
vernacular name ‘‘Comatule” (though without diagnosis) for the comatulids, which
he latinized and formally described in 1816 as Comatula, assigning to his new genus
eight species, seven of them new, and overlooking the Asterias tenella of Retzius.
But in the meantime (1815) William Elford Leach had slipped in with his new
genus Alecto, covering the same ground as Lamarck’s Comatula, to which he assigned
three species, all of which, as well as the genus itself, were very poorly diagnosed.
Leach’s new species were based upon specimens then in the British Museum; he
made no reference to any other worker and, as his types have since been lost, we
do not know for certain (except in one case by a fairly reasonable inference) what
his species were. As given by himself the three species are:
Alecto NOTUAG © o.oo fe sa 5 cals oS ee Sot ee ee Eee eee rn
Alecto Cur pea. oe sas Soa ete ROS ce ae ORs Antedon bifida.
Alecto) CONNALGE 3. S326 55524 -F= n> ee eee eee eee (most probably) Tropiometra, sp.
It is important to scrutinize carefully Leach’s arrangement in order to determine
the availability of Alecto as a generic name. All subsequent authors, for instance
Schweigger in 1819 and Miller in 1840, have accepted Alecto horrida as the repre-
sentative species of the genus. Alecto europza is the same as the Antedon gorgonia
of De Fréminville, and is therefore the type of Antedon, 1811; moreover, it is also
the same thing as the Ganymeda pulchella of J. E. Gray, 1834, which is the type of
the genus Ganymeda. Alecto carinata is possibly the same as the Comatula carinata
of Lamarck, 1816, which is the type of the genus Tropiometra, 1907; this process of
elimination thus leaving Alecto horrida as the type of Alecto. Alecto horrida is quite
unidentifiable, and therefore Alecto is unavailable as a generic name among the
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 25
comatulids, which is rather fortunate in view of the fact that a subsequently estab-
lished Alecto has been widely used as a generic name among the Bryozoa.
Schweigger attempted to make Alecto horrida a synonym of the Linnean
Asterias multiradiata; but we can not attach any importance to this, as it was cus-
tomary until a much later date to consider all multibrachiate comatulids as belong-
ing to the species ‘‘ multiradiata,” as was done, for instance, by Audouin and Leuck-
art, through ignorance of the real generic and specific, as well as of the family,
characters of the animals.
The comatulids mentioned and described by Lamarck in the year following
Leach’s description of his three new species of Alecto are:
Comatula solaris, sp. NOV-.-----------------------2-+200+- Comatula solaris.
Capillaster sentosa.
Comatula multiradiata.......--------+--------+-------++---- {come bennetti. %
Comaster multifida.
Comatula rotalaria, sp. NOV.-------------------------------- Comatula rotalaria.
Comatula fimbriata, sp. NOV ...---------------------+-+----- Capillaster multiradiata.
Comatula carinata, sp. NOV...-.----------------------------- Tropiometra carinata.
Comatula mediterranea, 8p. NOV ..--.------------------------ Antedon mediterranea.
Comatula adeonx, sp. NOV-..---..-------------------+--+---- Oligometrides adeonz.
Comatula brachiolata, sp. NOV .------------------------------ Comatulella brachiolata.
The determination of the type of the genus Comatula is a matter of consider-
able importance in crinoid nomenclature ; succeeding authors have either accepted
it in the sense of Lamarck to cover all comatulids, or have dropped it altogether ;
the genus has never been properly revised. Now Lamarck’s generic diagnosis is
quite explicit; it reads, ‘‘bouche inférieur, centrale, isolée, membraneuse, tubu-
leuse, saillante;” this obviously refers to the anal tube which was mistaken by
Lamarck for the mouth, and shows that when it was written he had in mind an
exocyclic form, or a member of the family Comasteridx, thus eliminating from
consideration the species adeonz, carinata, fimbriata (which has a central or sub-
central mouth, though belonging to the Comasteride), and mediterranea, and leaving
solaris, brachiolata, rotalaria, and multiradiata, the last having been subsequently
eliminated by L. Agassiz, who made it the type of his new genus Comaster in 1836.
Rotalaria was designated as the type of Comanthus in 1907, thus leaving the two
species solaris and brachiolata as possible types of Comatula; of the two solaris
agrees best with the generic description which, moreover, could not by any chance
have been based upon brachiolata, as the two specimens of that form known to
Lamarck are both very small, and have the arms folded in such a way as to conceal
the disk. Thus we find that solaris must be taken as the type of the genus Comatula.
Lamarck had undoubtedly originated the name Comatula or, in its French form,
“Comatule” long before he published it, and before either Antedon or Alecto were
published, and, as priority of publication was not such a vital matter in those days
as it is now, he was unwilling to relinquish it in favor of either of the earlier names,
the more so as both of these were ill-defined and covered the ground only in a
rudimentary way; his reputation was so great that practically all succeeding authors
followed him, only a very few resurrecting Leach’s name Alecto, while Antedon was
completely buried.
79146°—Bull. 82—15 3
26 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Prof. Johannes Miller was largely responsible for the later disregard of the
generic name Comatula in favor of Alecto, rehabilitated, and Actinometra, newly
coined; for he employed Comatula as a term to include all comatulids, and expressed
the finer divisions by Alecto and Actinometra, used in a subgeneric sense. Dr. P. H.
Carpenter followed Miiller in this perversion of Comatula, and used the name only
in a sort of vernacular way, much as we now use the word ‘‘comatulid.” In
speaking exactly he always used Eudiocrinus, Antedon, Actinometra, Atelecrinus,
etc., but when he merely wished to differentiate the free from the stalked forms he
always spoke of the former, or of any one of them (most commonly Antedon bifida,
which he regarded as the type of the group), as ‘‘Comatula.”
Lamarck entirely failed to recognize the affinities of the comatulids, and placed
them with the starfishes, though in a separate genus, as other post-Linnean authors
had dote.
In the year following the appearance of Lamarck’s treatise on the comatulids
the portion of Savigny’s description of Egypt dealing with the echinoderms was
published; in it were figured two comatulids from the Red Sea, one of which was
designated (the identifications being by Audouin) as ‘‘Comatula sp.,” the other as
“Comatula multiradiata.”’ There is no further reference to the first of these figures,
which represents the local species of Tropiometra; but in 1836 de Blainyille copied
the second in the atlas to his ‘‘Manuel d’Actinologie;”’ in doing this he made a
curious mistake, for the plate is lettered ‘‘Comatula adeonex,” though in the text
the description of Comatula adeone is taken from Lamarck, and the species is
correctly said to have 10 arms. In the year following the ‘‘Penny Encyclopedia”
copied de Blainville’s account of Comatula adeonx, multiradiate figure and all, and
the same slip was made by Knight in his ‘‘Natural History,” published in 1867.
In 1819 Schweigger figured various parts of a species which he determined,
without doubt incorrectly, as ‘‘Comatula multiradiata;” he further identified this
with Leach’s Alecto horrida.
J.S. Miller, in his epoch making monograph published in 1821, again raised the
comatulids to a position next to the fossil crinoids, and thus brought the conception
of the group as a whole to the same level at which it had been left by Llhuyd 120
years before. Miller proposed the name Crinoidea for the class, but he only
mentioned one comatulid, the Rosy Feather Star (the only one with which he was
personally acquainted), which he had found at Milford Haven. He was unable
to place this species in reference to those described by Lamarck, and therefore
tentatively described it as new under the name of Comatula fimbriata, which
name Miiller in 1841 changed to milleri owing to the conflict with the Lamarckian
Comatula fimbriata which is quite a different thing. Lamarck’s Comatula fimbriata
is the species now known as Capillaster multiradiata, a species belonging to the
Comasteridx, while Miller’s Comatula fimbriata is the common Antedon bifida, a
species belonging to the Antedonide.
In 1822 we find the first reference to a comatulid in American zodlogical litera-
ture, Prof. S. L. Mitchill recording two specimens, which he did not identify, from
Gaspar Strait. In 1825 Mr. Titian Peale found on the beach at Great Egg Harbor,
New Jersey, a specimen which he sent to the Museum of the Philadelphia Academy;
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 21
there it was studied by Thomas Say who, however, could not identify it with any of
the species then known, so he described it as new, calling it (emending Leach’s
generic name) Alectro dentata. Say’s species has never been properly understood;
it has been very generally confused with Alecto sarsii, later described, and with the
Asterias tenella of Retzius which also came from America, but from farther north,
although it is in reality perfectly distinct from both. It is probable that up to the
present time no one has been able to make direct comparisons between these three
forms, for certainly Carpenter, had he done so, could never, as he did, have called
them identical.
About this time (but just when I have been unable to ascertain) W. E. Leach
described the common and magnificent arctic species, from specimens brought from
Spitzbergen, as Alecto (i. e., Heliometra) glacialis.
In 1826 Risso published his Comatula coralina and C. annulata (both synonyms
of Lamarck’s Comatula mediterranea), basing them upon specimens obtained at
Nice; and in the same year J. E. Gray published a paper on the digestive system of
the comatulids in which he proposed uniting them with the so-called Crinoidea of
Miller under the family name of Encrinitidx; in other words proposing Encrinitide
(or Encrinidz) as a synonym of Miller’s Crinoidea.
The year 1827 was a memorable one in the history of the comatulids, for in
that year Dr. John Vaughan Thompson discovered in the Cove of Cork in Ireland
a small organism which he at once recognized as a crinoid and described in detail
in his classical memoir on the ‘‘Pentacrinus europeus.’’ In the following year
Fleming became impressed with the differences between this small species and the
larger pentacrinites, and proposed for it the new generic name Hibernula, this
being rejected two years later by de Blainville who, considering that the names of
all stalked crinoids should end in ‘‘-crinus,” rechristened it Phytocrinus. But
Thompson had not been satisfied with the mere discovery of this interesting animal ;
he made it the object of careful study, and in 1835 he announced that it was nothing
more nor less than the young of the common comatulid, Antedon bifida.
Fleming in 1828 suggested the recognition of two species of British comatu-
lids, as had been done by Pennant, but for them he resurrected the long-forgotten
names of Linck, calling them Comatula rosacea and C. barbata. The former was
quickly adopted, both because of its eminent appropriateness and because of the
great and deserved prestige of its author, and had become firmly fixed in the
nomenclature before growmg sentiment in favor of a more stringent adherence
to the principle of adopting the works of Linné as the starting point in all zoélog-
ical nomenclature finally dislodged it. Some sacrifice must of necessity be made
to secure nomenclatorial uniformity, but we can not help regretting the rejection
of the appropriate names conferred upon the sea stars by such a master of the
subject as Linck in favor of the attenuated and often questionable nomenclatorial
resultants obtained by the analysis of the unwieldy composites created by his
less discriminating successor. At the same time Fleming proposed the family
Comatulade for the comatulids, together with the Pentacrinus europzus of Thomp-
son, and he suggested a division of the family, one part to contain certain forms
having the digestive apparatus with two apertures (as Gray had shown to be the
28 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
case in Antedon bifida), the other to contain those like Pentacrinus ewropeus in which
the digestive system was supposed to have but a single opening.
In 1831 Ferussac recorded that M. Lemare-Piquot brought back many coma-
tulids collected on his voyage to the East Indies and South Africa.
Georg August Goldfuss in 1832 published a description and a figure of a speci-
men which he had found at Bonn, which he referred to ‘‘ Comatula multiradiata” ;
the species represented is the Alecto bennetti subsequently described by Miller. At
the same time Goldfuss gave a good comparative account of the common Mediter-
ranean Antedon for comparison with the fossil species with which he was mainly
concerned,
Riippel, in the course of his travels, found in the Red Sea an interesting multi-
radiate comatulid upon which he bestowed the manuscript name of ‘‘ Comatula
leucomelas,”’ but he does not appear to have mentioned it anywhere in his works.
In 1833 Leuckart came across his specimens in the Senckenberg Museum at Frank-
fort and published the name together with the locality, though without any diag-
nosis. Recently Hartlaub has reéxamined the specimens, and has found them
to be examples of the Alecto palmata later described by Miller.
Leuckart was the first to describe the curious parasitic worms belonging to
the genus Myzostoma with which crinoids are usually infested, his attention having
been first called to them by mistaking one for a madreporic plate. In discussing
the genus Jfyzostoma he mentions a multiradiate comatulid from the Red Sea
which, following Audouin, he identifies as “‘Comatula multiradiata,’ but which
von Graff, acting on the advice of P. H. Carpenter, has suggested was probably
an example of Heterometra savignii, the species to which Audouin’s Comatula
multiradiata has always been referred.
In 1834 Dr. J. E. Gray found upon the coast of Kent a peculiar organism
which he was unable to place, and he therefore described it as new under the name
of Ganymeda pulchella. Later it was discovered that his supposedly anomalous
creature was merely the detached centrodorsal of the common Antedon bifida.
In 1835 the first mention of a recent crinoid occurs in Australian zodlogical
literature; in that year the Rey. C. Pleydell N. Wilton described, under the name of
Enerinus australis, what he supposed to be a new species, but which has since
proved not to be a crinoid at all. Ten years later his paper was in part translated
into French and reprinted, the author's name being incorrectly given as ‘Rev.
C. Pleydell.’’
In the year 1836 de Blainville published a valuable summary of the knowledge
which had been acquired in regard to the comatulids; his account of them is prac-
tically the same as that contained in the later editions of the work of Lamarck.
de Blainville had previously published two less extended treatises on the group
in the well known “‘Dictionaire d’histoire naturelle,’ one in volume 10 (1818),
the other in volume 60 (1830).
Prof. Louis Agassiz in 1836 founded his genus Comaster, based upon the Comat-
ula multiradiata of Lamarck, which unfortunately is not the same as the Asterias
multiradiata of Linné and of Retzius. Agassiz employed as the differential char-
acter for his new genus the excess of the numbor of arms over the 10 found in
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 29
“
Comatula as he restricted it, a character which we now know to be of very uncertain
value.
In the ‘Inconographie du Regne Animal” published by Guérin-Ménéville
during the years from 1828 to 1837 there are two figures supposed to represent the
species described as Comatula carinata from Mauritius; possibly the first (2) does
represent this-species, though it looks more like some species of Antedon; but the
second (2a) appears to be a species of Amphimetra, and agrees fairly well with A.
discoidea from northern Australia and the East Indies. There is a specimen of
Amphimetra discoidea (labeled by P. H. Carpenter Antedon milberti var. dibra-
chiata) in the Paris Museum from which I suspect this figure was drawn.
In the course of his studies on the echinoderms Prof. Johannes Miller had
become interested in the comatulids, and in 1841 he published a paper upon the
group in which he described the new genus Actinometra. The type of his new
genus was the new species Actinometra impertalis, founded upon a magnificent speci-
men two feet in expanse which he had found in the Vienna Museum labeled ‘ Coma-
tula solaris.’ In addition to Actinometra imperialis Miller described as new the
following species, all of which he referred to Leach’s genus Alecto:
Alecto milleri (new name for Comatula jimbriata Miller, not
Comatula fimbriata Lamarck)........--------------------4 Antedon bifida.
Alecto phalangium.......-----------+-+----+- 2222-22222 rete Leptometra phalangium.
AllectO: €8CRTUCKL = 9) = 21 = «=m iniei= == infec = ale min me wn = Heliometra glacialis.
Alecto echinoptera
Ey es ers are oinias et Neteller tai Comactinia echinoptera.
Alecto rosea
oe ey oie ae et stS eee ee cleepaie ET Comatula brachiolata.
AEG TGUIG TR aoe ceacre ce anaacscopeusee oun dns sous - saree Amphimetra tessellata.
Alecto polyarthra........-----------------+--------+-----+-=- (Not identifiable.)
Alecto multifida (see below)..---...------------++------------- Comaster multifida.
Allecto 80VUQIIN. 22-10 0 - oan = = a oa meses ei ain in Heterometra savignit.
| Lamprometra palmata.
Alecto palmata
ecto p |Lamprometra protectus.
Alecto parvicirra. .....-------+-+----- +--+ 2-222 eee etree eee Comanthus parvicirra,
PAllechONLUTILONeNSIS sane eens so sila sate le epee ae etal ote na aii Comanthus parvicirra.
Alecto japonicd.......-----+--+-+-------- 2-2 - == 2-222 eee eee Comanthus japonica.
WAlectoNfiag CUlatas ee. on sae ne ee le aaa inl aeae = = Dichrometra flagellata.
Alecto novxe-guine®. ..---------- +++ +--+ 2-2-2 - 22 e rere Comaster novxeguinex.
Alecto elongata........--------------------------+-----+---- Dichrometra flagellata.
AUD GDB acaba ceessecnneetod sho seocus Jecooceueadsopenese Comanthus bennetti.
Miiller found in the literature three species which bore the name multiradiata,
in addition to the so-called ‘‘multiradiatas” of Leuckart, Audouin, and Schweigger,
which he seems to have correctly considered wrongly so called; one of these had
been described by Linné (Asterias multiradiata) and later redescribed by Retzius,
another had been described by Lamarck (Comatula multiradiata), while a third had
been described and beautifully figured by Goldfuss (Comatula multiradiata). Both
Lamarck and Goldfuss had been under the impression that the species they had in
hand was the one originally diagnosed by Linné. Miller took the ground that the
name should hold for the species or form which was best described, and he treated
the Asterias multiradiata of Linné and the Comatula multiradiata of Lamarck as
being quite unrecognizable from the published descriptions, and therefore not ten-
able. The Comatula multiradiata of Goldfuss, well described and illustrated with
30 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
an excellent figure, he considered as the true multiradiata, and when he came to
examine Troschel’s notes upon the Lamarckian types at Paris he never thought of
restoring to them the name multiradiata, but renamed one of the two forms repre-
sented among them (Alecto) multifida, at the same time describing it in detail.
This action of Miller in describing anew the Comatula multiradiata of Lamarck,
hitherto unidentifiable, resulted in the positive identification of that species, and
with it, the genus of which it is the type, the Comaster of L. Agassiz. The type of
this genus now becomes Alecto multifida Miller—Comatula multiradiata Lamarék
reidentified. Concurrently with his perversion of the specific name multiradiata,
Miiller shifted the genus Comaster of Agassiz to cover the species described and
figured by Goldfuss, in spite of Agassiz’ statement that the multiradiata of Lamarck
was the fype.
Although P. H. Carpenter in his earlier work partially rectified this error, he
later accepted Miiller’s views in regard to Comaster, and thus failed to recognize its
rightful place in nomenclature.
In the year in which Miller published his first paper on the comatulids (1841)
Delle Chiaie described his Comatula bicolor, which seems to have attracted little
attention, as it was generally recognized as merely a synonym of Lamarck’s Comatula
mediterranea.
Miller went to Sweden and examined at Lund the Linnean types, publishing
in 1843 a redescription of both Asterias multiradiata and A. pectinata, but he curi-
ously overlooked the type of Retzius’ Asterias tenella. At the same time he de-
scribed two new species, Alecto purpurea, which he found in the Berlin Museum,
and Alecto wahlbergii, which he found in the Stockholm Museum. Both of these
species have since been strangely neglected, the former being incorrectly treated
as a synonym of the Linnean Asterias pectinata, and the latter as a synonym of
Miiller’s earlier Alecto parvicirra.
Michelin in 1845 noted the occurrence of Comatula carinata (Tropiometra
carinata) at Mauritius.
In 1846 Diiben and Koren announced the discovery on the coasts of Scandinavia
of two species which they were unable to identify with any of the previously de-
scribed forms; they accordingly proposed for them the names Alecto petasus and
Alecto sarsii, following Miller in the use of Leach’s name Alecto. The first of these
species had been reported from the Scandinavian coast by Prof. Michael Sars in
1835 under the name of Comatula mediterranea, but his notice of its occurrence
does not seem to have attracted much attention.
In 1846 Miiller deseribed four additional species (Comatula macronema, C.
jacquinoti, OC. trichoptera, and C. reynaudii) which he found in the Paris Museum,
and in 1849 he published his very important memoir on the genus Comatula and its
species, the first really adequate work on the subject, in which he treated of all the
forms then known. His genus Actinometra had given him considerable trouble, for
in many cases he had been unable to determine whether a specimen should be
referred to that genus or to Alecto (as understood by him), and in specimens in which
the disk was lost or concealed, as he knew of no other differences than those afforded
by the,arrangement of the ambulacra, he was, of course, quite at a loss. He there-
fore reduced Actinometra and Alecto to subgeneric rank under Comatula, which he
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 31
employed as a general term to cover all species; if he could make out with cer-
tainty the arrangement of the ambulacra, he inserted Alecto or Actinometra, as the
case happened to be, between Comatula and the specific name; if he could not, he
omitted the subgeneric designation and referred the species unqualifiedly to
Comatula. Some idea of the difficulties which he encountered (undoubtedly largely
through differences in the state ot preservation and consequent different degrees of
distortion of the soft parts of the specimens examined by him) may be gathered from
the fact that he placed a single species, Comanthus parvicirra, both in Actinometra
(twice) and in Alecto, and also in the incerte sedis under Comatula.
In the course of his studies Miller had discovered that his Actinometra impe-
rialis was identical with Lamarck’s Comatula solaris; but while he dropped the spe-
cific name imperialis he still clung to his Actinometra, not relinquishing it, as he
should have done, in favor of Comatula. In this, as in other things, he was followed
by P. H. Carpenter.
Miiller’s final arrangement of the comatulids was as follows:
Comatula (Actinometra) solaris..........--------------------Comatula solaris.
(GE(CActimometra) rota lamiasme sae eae se eas ae rea Comatula rotalaria.
Ga eAchinometi@) MUGlt DERG Vcc etree se ae ne nee oll Comanthus wahlbergii.
( (Aldecta eChinio Pten Omen ees arte lateral Comactinia echinoptera.
(GE (Allecto) Wrrred tern O10 (eet eet eee oe ei Antedon mediterranea.
(Oa CAlecto caries eee ee eee ee eae tee Tropiometra carinata.
CR (Alecto) mail bertyaeeen eran oie ae a ea Amphimetra milberti.
CUCAllecto) phalanguinis esses ee ee ee eee Leptometra phalangium.
(GR(CAllecto) pelos is aceite ere a ete ale aera er ei oi Antedon petasus.
Ga(Allecto) sareiisen se eee eee ee eee Hathrometra sarsii.
(GA (Allecto es chirich titan semen em esto alata ee Heliometra glacialis.
Ga (Al ecto) sagittis ees a eee ola Heterometra savignii.
OS (CAllecio) jumbria asec = eee eee ee ele eerie ee Capillaster multiradiata.
C. (Alecto) reynaudii.........-------------------++=-------=- Heterometra reynaudii.
(GN(Allecto)) DOTViCir TG eae = ae alae a ale aoe eer = Comanthus parvicirra.
Lamprometra protectus.
G, (Alecto) palmata......---.-------=-9>-<---------=- ee Sche Lainproniesea boatnintan
er Capillaster sentosa.
C. (Alecto) multiradiata......-...----+----+-+--------+------- | Capiiasten enaiinesats
C. (Alecto) articulata, sp. nOV...----------------------------- Liparometra articulata.
GGTACRO Latte eee eae © = aaa ee ae nine Comatula brachiolata.
Guniiilenttease eee oe cn cen = oe oe oa ie ae ee a eae ee Antedon bifida.
(GS OSEO ee eos sane n= aslo sie ee aes Pelee nal Comatula brachiolata.
Gado eke eae sss eS Acie ees aoe eee Oligometrides adeonx.
C. cumingii, sp. NOV.-.---.--------+---+---+2 202s rere eee ee Comatula pectinata.
C. elongata.....-.------2-----+ 022222 cere tenner e serene Dichrometra flagellata.
C. trichopterd...-...---------- +--+ 22-22-2222 reer t etree Comanthus trichoptera.
G@. macronema.....=-..-----=-+-+-2-2-- 22-225 - + ester ess Ptilometra macronema.
C. philiberti......-.--------++---02- 22222 e eee eter e estes Amphimetra philiberti.
C. japonica: .......---.--------------+---=+----- See ees Comanthus japonica.
G, multifida.....-.-2.-2------22 + 2-222 2c e nese e eset esse eee Comaster multifida.
GEALUT ONENESS Seer iors Ge = ie wi aia mass sie ein Tans = cine Comanthus parvicirra.
C. flagellata....--..----------+--+ +++ +2222 e eee terete Dichrometra flagellata.
C. nove-quinex....--.-----------+----- Dee ape a nate nya tiete ...-Comaster novxguinex.
Galben el iis eee ane = cide nia = Sales siele erin Seiei=ieleitae sie erate Comanthus bennetti.
C.. jacquinoti......--2-----------0- 222222 cee neers eee Amphimetra jacquinoti.
Gin festaiiataMee eee cess. c1- owe niod nine hiss Ass Satan eas ia ar Amphimetra (?) tessellata.
82 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
It will be noticed that there is no mention in this list of the Asterias tenella of
Retzius, the Alectro dentata of Say, or of the Alecto glacialis of Leach.
While working up the natural history of Chile for inclusion in his monographie
account of that country, Gay found in the Paris Museum a number of comatulids
which had been labeled by Valenciennes Comatula picta, and which were said to
have been obtained in Chile. In the eighth volume of his work (1854) Gay described
these under Valenciennes’ name of Comatula picta; but he makes no further men-
tion of their occurrence in that country. The specimens belong to the common
Brazilian species of Tropiometra, and could not have come from Chile; they prob-
ably came to France on a ship from Chile which had touched at some Brazilian port
on the way.
In 1857 Barrett discovered in the Sound of Skye a curious species which he
named Comatula woodwardii (Leptometra celtica), but which he renamed (jointly
with McAndrew) in the following year Comatula celtica, to avoid conflict with a
previously described fossil Comatula woodwardii.
Dujardin and Hupé in 1862 published their great work on the so-called zo06-
phytes, the former being responsible for that part which dealt with the comatulids.
These authors followed Miller closely, but corrected many of his mistakes, while
making some additional errors of their own. They recognized three genera of
recent comatulids which they called Actinometra, Comatula, and Comaster, the
last being based upon Goldfuss’, Comatula multiradiata and used, therefore, in the
same sense in which it was understood by Miiller. Actinometra as described by
them has a central anus, the brachial ambulacra leading to a horseshoe-shaped
peripheral furrow; Comatula included the forms in which the mouth is central and
forms the converging point of five equal radiating ambulacra on the disk. Actino-
metra imperialis, which Miller himself had shown to be but a synonym of Comatula
solaris, they reinstated as a valid species, even going so far as to consider it generically
different from C. solaris.
Their arrangement of the yarious species is:
Comatula medterrdnens. os sess oa oe ek aoe tae ee eee Antedon mediterranea.
Comimtina phalanguivimys sso. c56 os eecae sh eRe eee Leptometra phalangium.
Comatula petasus. <2 <2222-s05ssvecenes oese de <5>- 52 —Antedon petasus:
COMUAtULE RORBE Se ssa es oda 4 Se GA Ee RR eee Hathrometra sarsit.
Comatula eschrichtii.............-..-- ae Aen ee ane eee ..-Heliometra glacialis.
Comatila carinata® Sas. 22222 22 5s oe eee eee 3 Sades Soe Tropiometra carinata.
Comatilar ddhonige Noe oss Rec ee Oligometrides adeonz.
Comatula trichoplenam 428. % 5.) bu SUR eye cee eo Comanthus trichoptera.
Comatitlals eynatuiy ake 8 32228 = ots 9-7 Boers Sa ieeranrn Heterometra reynaudii.
Comatilareolaris mare pecan cos tc eas ce en ee Comatula solaris.
COMABIG UTRCNOUAG. Ae lycn 2c an oe Bone oe renee Comatulella brachiolata.
Comatila'echnnoplerd.. 22... 25 scat cce- fee Comactinia echinoptera.
Conuriitlaposedi ss soc 20 knee Sot SS a ee ec ee eee Comatulella brachiolata.
Conant a tease tata ee is mene See hee tn ge rote Amphimetra (?) tessellata.
CRITE DURES sheet a SUS ee eats ee Comatula purpurea.
Comatnlen philber tie. 202585 orc ooceh vines comet ances cue sen See Amphimetra philiberti.
COMMER NAWE Coser es one woe ph Lean See tLe Seok Cer ee Amphimetra milberti.
COMMU A FORRMO = aos one Ee eae See eee Amphimetra jacquinoti.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 33
Comatula macronema...---------+++++-++-- +22 25rrett tt Ptilometra macronema.
Comatula savignyi ....---------++---+---2220e cette ttre Heterometra savignit.
Comatula rotalaria.......--------------------+-22 crt Comatula rotalaria.
Comatula fimbriata....-.------------------+++-2222e etree Capillaster multiradiata.
Comatula elongata....-------------------------72007 0700 Dichrometra flagellata.
Comatula parvicirra. .....----------+-----2222020 05 tr rte Comanthus parvicirra.
Comatula japonica. .-..-----------------+-+-222222 700 or ee Comanthus japonica.
Comatula flagellata.......--------------++-+-------77 77707 Dichrometra flagellata.
Comatula timorensis...-.-.---------------------- +t ttre Comanthus parvicura.
Comatula articulata. ....------------+----------- 22000 ttt ce Liparometra articulata.
Comatula multifida......--------------------220222 2200 Comaster multifida.
Comatula novx-guinex.-..------------------+222227 000 0t Comaster novxguiner.
Comatula bennetti.....-.------------------- 2220 ttre Comanthus bennettt.
Actinometra imperialis......----------------+-++77277 00077 Comatula solaris.
Actinometra pectinata...--.--------------------702 tr ttttt Comatula pectinata.
Actinometra multiradiata...-.---------+--------------7777- lon ae Sem
Capillaster multiradiata.
Actinometra wahlbergii....-------------------7----70 ttt? Comanthus wahlbergit.
Comaster multiradiatus.....---------------+----+2-27-07777> Comanthus bennetti.
In addition to these described forms they gave a list of undescribed species,
taking the names from labeled specimens in the Paris Museum.
While we are not at present directly concerned except with the systematic
history of the comatulids, it would be impossible to appreciate this properly without
some idea of the relative progress made along other lines of study, and it is therefore
fitting that some mention be made of the new era in the elucidation of the structure
and development of the group which began in the year 1863.
Adams in 1800 had called attention to the two apertures on the comatulid
disk, while in the years 1823-1826 Péron, Gray, Leuckart, Meckel and Heusinger
independently demonstrated, in varying degrees of completeness, the existence of a
coiled digestive tract. In 1835 Dujardin showed that the eggs of the comatulids
are borne externally on the pinnules and are not internal as in the other echinoderms,
while in the same year J. V. Thompson demonstrated the stalked condition of the
young. In 1843 Miller made a valuable contribution to the knowledge of the struc-
ture of the comatulids in his classical memoir on the structure of Pentacrinus caput-
meduse. (Isocrinus asteria) ; but the true understanding of the comatulid embryology,
development and structure may be justly said to date from the epoch-making
memoirs of Prof. George J. Allman, 1863 (‘prebrachial” larval stage), Prof. Sir C.
Wyville Thomson, 1865 (early development), and especially of Dr. William Ben-
jamin Carpenter, 1866 (ater development, history and structure).
Canon Alfred Merle Norman in 1865 published the results of his researches on
British echinoderms, in which he followed Gray (1848) in the use of Antedon in
preference to Comatula, at the same time changing the family name to Antedonide.
He described no new species, but he recognized, as Pennant and Fleming had done,
two British species of the A. bifida type, Antedon rosacea (following Fleming in the
use of Linck’s name) and A. milleri, which latter he included on the authority of
Sir Wyville Thomson.
In the same year Mr. Alexander Agassiz and Mrs. Elizabeth Cary Agassiz
definitely made known the first species of the family Comasteride, Comatula
34 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
meridionalis (Comactinia meridionalis), from the American coast of the Atlantic,
though it has subsequently been found that Miiller’s Alecto echinoptera is also an
American form.
In 1866 Wilhelm Bohlsche described as new a curious little comatulid from
the coast of Brazil which he had been unable to identify with any known form. He
called it, in compliment to the justly famous Norwegian naturalist of that name,
Antedon diibenii. This species has been the cause of considerable confusion; P. H.
Carpenter identified with it a specimen which the Challenger dredged at Bahia, and
figured both this specimen and the type in the Challenger report on the “Comatulx.”
The Challenger specimen is a young example of Tropiometra picta, but the type
specimen obviously belongs to the Antedonide, and to the genus Antedon. It is
only within the past year that this species has been rediscovered, the second known
specimen having been collected on the island of St. Thomas.
It was in 1866 also that Prof. Sven Lovén instituted the new genus Phanogenia
for the reception of a curious exocyclic comatulid from Singapore which differed
from all the other species then known in having the centrodorsal very much reduced,
in fact merely a small stellate plate, and quite without cirri. This form he called
Phanogenia typica (Comaster typica).
Two years afterwards (1868) Professor Lovén announced the startling discovery
of a recent cystid at Cape York, Australia, which subsequently proved to be nothing
but the detached disk of one of the Zygometride. This so-called Hyponome sarsii
of Lovén was the first zygometrid known; but in the same year Prof. Carl Semper
introduced to science a second, the peculiar Ophiocrinus (Eudiocrinus) indivisus,
remarkable in possessing but 5 arms, whereas all the other comatulids then known
had at least 10.
The United States Coast Survey had been for some time engaged in a systematic
study of the marine conditions off the coast of the southern United States, and
Count L. F. de Pourtalés was thus enabled in 1868 to make known the interesting
Comatula brevipinna (Crinometra brevipinna, the first known species of the Charito-
metride) and Comatula hagenii (Coccometra hagenii), the first comatulids definitely
known from the West Indies, C. brevipinna being, moreover, the first species known
with “plated ambulacra”’ like those of the pentacrinites, though their existence in
this form was not demonstrated until many years later.
In the following year Kuhl and van Hasselt gave colored figures of two large
comatulids, one of which was described as new under the name of Comatula (Acti-
nometra) hamata (Comatula solaris), and Pourtalés added to the known fauna of
the West Indies his Antedon armata (Analcidometra armata), A. cubensis (Antedon
cubensis and Atelecrinus balanoides), and A. rubiginosa (Comactinia meridionalis).
At the same time Prof. E. von Martens recorded from the Red Sea the Alecto
palmata of Miller, which had originally been described from the Red Sea, and, erro-
neously, India, and recorded Comatula solaris (based on a specimen of Tropiometra
carinata) from Zanzibar.
Dr. C. F. Liitken had become interested in the comatulids, and had discovered
that in the exocyclie species the oral pinnules are furnished with a peculiar terminal
comb; he retained Actinometra for the exocyclic forms and used Antedon or Alecto
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 35
for the endocyclic. Unfortunately he never published any detailed account of his
studies himself, but he gave to Dr. P. H. Carpenter the results of his researches,
by whom they were published, together with his own observations, 10 or 12
years later (1879). Doctor Liitken had, however, in 1866, 1869, 1874, 1877 (two),
and 1879, published lists of the comatulids in the collection of the Godeffroy Museum
at Hamburg, which clearly show that his conception of the generic limits of ‘“‘ Ante-
don” and “ Actinometra” at that time was the same as that elaborated by P. H.
Carpenter in 1879 and in 1888. The names used by Liitken were all nomina nuda,
but all have since been identified.
In the United States Prof. Addison E. Verrill had taken up the study of the
echinoderms and, beginning in 1866, he published various papers in which he brought
up to date the somewhat scanty knowledge of the comatulids of North and South
America.
Sir C. Wyville Thomson, in his prelimimary report upon the crinoids collected by
the Porcupine expedition (1872) and in his semipopular work “The Depths of the
Sea,” published in 1873, as well as in “The Atlantic,”’ published in 1877, brought out
many new facts concerning the crinoid fauna of the north Atlantic and of the
Mediterranean.
In 1875 Grube described three new comatulids from Borneo, Comatula levis-
sima (Amphimetra levissima +Amphimetra malberti), Comatula (Actinometra)
borneensis (Capillaster multiradiata) and Comatula mertensi (Comanthus parvicirra),
reverting to the classification of Miller which had been abandoned by Verrill and
Pourtalés, these authors placing all their species in the genus Antedon, following
Norman and Gray.
In the year 1877 Prof. E. P. Wright described a supposed new genus and species
of sponge from Australia, which he called Kallispongia archeri. Mr. S. O. Ridley,
in reviewing the paper for the “Zodlogical Record,” at once noticed the similarity
of the animal to the stalked larva of Antedon, and expressed his doubts as to
whether it really was a sponge. Subsequent study has shown that Kallispongia
archeri is in reality the stalked larva of two Australian crinoids, Ptilometra miilleri
and (probably) Compsometra loveni. Were it not that the figure of the pentacrinoid
of Ptilometra miilleri is given as a “variety” of the supposed species, Kallispongia
would have to be used instead of Ptilometra.
At the same time the Rev. T. R. R. Stebbing, who had been interested in the
then current speculation in regard to the origin of the generic name Antedon, pub-
lished a short note stating that ’4v@jdov was the name of anymph mentioned by
Pausanias, and that the name would be more correct if spelled “ Anthedon.”” This
emendation has not, however, been adopted by any one except Minckert, who
employed it in one of his papers published in 1905.
Mention should here be made of the monograph published in 1877 by Prof.
Ludwig von Graff on the myzostomes, a group of curious ‘‘worms”’ until recently
known only as parasites upon the crinoids. In the preparation of this monograph
Professor von Graff received many specimens taken from crinoids bearing unpub-
lished museum names and from crinoids taken in localities not previously known to
support a crinoid fauna. Later Professor von Graff studied the myzostomes from
36 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
the Challenger erinoids, and from those collected by the Blake in the West Indies.
The names included in these later reports (two on the Challenger and one on the
Blake material) were furnished by P. H. Carpenter; but some of them were subse-
quently dropped by Carpenter, and others were never mentioned by him at all, so
that they now stand in von Graff’s works as nomina nuda.
In 1878 Pourtalés, continuing his studies, described Antedon alata (Neocomatella
alata), A. pulchella (Neocomatella alata), and A. granulifera (Crinometra granulifera).
Owing to the great difficulty which he must have had in comprehending the
vague descriptions of the early authors, and to a lack of the true appreciation of the
somewhat intricate differential specific characters of the group, as well as to the
almost complete absence of material with which to make comparisons, we find the
diagnoses of Pourtalés somewhat difficult to comprehend, the more so as many of
them are short and indefinite; the absence of authentic type-specimens, and a trans-
ference of certain of his original labels to species not agreeing with his diagnoses
have added to the confusion. Carpenter attempted to straighten matters out in
1881, but in some ways made things rather worse. Antedon granulifera Carpenter
at first decided was an ‘‘ Actinometra”’; later (1888) he shifted the name to a species
(Crinometra imbricata) resembling Crinometra brevipinna but entirely lacking the
peculiar granulated ornamentation which induced Pourtalés to bestow the name
granulifera upon it, and renamed Antedon pourtalesii what is most probably the type
of granulifera. Carpenter’s action in regard to Antedon alata and A. pulchella was
extremely arbitrary; he saw that the two were synonyms, but, instead of choosing
the first name given (alata), he chose the later (pulchella) as being more appropriate.
In 1879 Dr. Edgar A. Smith described in great detail a new comatulid from the
island of Rodriguez, which remains to-day the only crinoid known from that locality;
he called it Comatula indica (Stephanometra indica) and it was the first species to be
discovered belonging to the family Stephanometride. In the same year Dr. Richard
Rathbun published the results of his study of the Brazilian comatulids, carefully
comparing Brazilian and African specimens of the corresponding species of Tropio-
metra, and describing in detail, though conscientiously refraining from naming,
another species from Brazil which has since proved to be the interesting Nemaster
lineata.
The year 1879 marked the beginning of a new epoch in the study of the comatu-
lids, for in that year was published Philip Herbert Carpenter’s masterly monograph
on the genus “‘ Actinometra,”’ which is, in many ways, the best work he ever did, and
which is free from a number of the more serious errors which mar the Chal-
lenger report published nine years later. In this work he reviews the whole subject
of the comatulids and gives a detailed account of the comparative structure of such
species as were available. One new species, Actinometra polymorpha, is described,
which, however, he soon found to be the same as the Alecto parvicirra of Miller.
In the same year Carpenter published a preliminary account of the comatulids
which had been collected by the Challenger, in which he diagnosed the remarkable
new genus Promachocrinus which has 10 radials instead of the usual 5.
In 1881 Carpenter followed this with a similar report on the collections of the
United States Coast Survey steamer Blake, in which he gave us an idea of the fauna
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 37
of the Caribbean Sea, and made known the remarkable new genus Atelecrinus,
assigning to it three species, Atelecrinus balanoides (sp. nov.), A. cubensis (Antedon
cubensis Pourtalés, in part; immature A. balanoides), and A. sp. (Atelecrinus
wyvillii). In addition he described the interesting Antedon spinifera (Stylometra
spinifera), and first recorded (in that species) the presence of a complete ambulacral
plating in a comatulid comparable to that found in the pentacrinites, while he also
figured, without giving a formal description, the extraordinary form which he
called Antedon columnaris (Zenometra columnaris). In the same year he reported
upon the rich comatulid collection of the Leyden Museum (which had previously
been studied by Miller), and laid the foundation for knowledge of the remarkable
comatulid fauna of the East Indies.
The species which he discussed in this paper were:
Tropiometra encrinus.
Antedon carinata...-.-.------------=+-2-2-2---272777 27° Tropiometra carinata.
Tropiometra picta.
Antedon serripinna, sp. NOV----------------+---72 705700 Oligometra serripinna.
Antedon pinniformis, sp. DOV. .--------------727 7777777774 Amphimetra pinniformis.
Antedon perspinosa, Sp. NOV----------+-------7 725522777 Colobometra perspinosa.
Antedon spicata, sp. DOV----------------+---7 2770000077" Stephanometra spicata.
Antedon levicirra, 8p. DOV. .------------------7270rstt tte Lamprometra protectus.
Antedon flagellata......-------------0+7 277752 crtttttt Dichrometra flagellata.
Antedon bimaculata, sp. NOV.------------+------277707 7777 Dichrometra bimaculata.
Writedon: elongates = ee ana aoe an cin Dichrometra flagellata.
Actinometra typica...-----------------2227 ror Comaster typica.
Actinometra japonica. .-.-----------+2222-7r rrr rrrr ttt Comanthus japonica.
Actinometra schlegelii, sp. NOV. ------------------7777 777777 Comanthina schlegelit.
Actinometra nove-guine®....-------+---2252 cer sttttrt Comaster noveguinex.
Actinometra robustipinna, sp. DOV. -------------227777 777" Himerometra robustipinna.
Actinometra alternans, sp. DOV--------++------772777 77777 Comantheria allernans.
Actinometra parvicirra ...---------------27 5572 trct tr Comanthus parvicirra.
(Alecto timorensis)-..------=---+--2- =r aceon c recs t neo Comanthus parvicirra.
(Comatula simplex) ..--------2-+---2000 borne Comanthus parvicirra.
Actinometra peronii, Sp. DOV--------------27 7720007 T Comanthus bennett.
Actinometra bennetti....----------=22- 2277-57250 Comanthus bennetti.
In 1882 he further elucidated the East Indian fauna in a similar paper on the
comatulids of the Hamburg Museum, in which he also takes up the peculiar genus
Ophiocrinus (Semper, 1868), changing the name to Eudiocrinus (Ophiocrinus being
preoccupied), and describing some additional species, which have recently been
shown to have only a very remote relation to the original Ophiocrinus indivisus.
The comatulids considered in this paper are:
Atelecrinus balanoides...--.-----<--=2 =~ - 9925223 Atelecrinus balanoides.
eelecrinus: CUDENSIS = = <== 2 Atelecrinus balanoides.
Atelecrinus wyvillii, sp. NOV.------------77 225-02 r Atelecrinus wyvillit.
Eudiocrinus indivisus.--.--------------07 ct tc rr Eudiocrinus indivisus.
Eudiocrinus varians, sp. DOV---------------7557 7775050 Pentametrocrinus varians.
Eudiocrinus semperi, Sp. ROV--------------7277 7770777777 Pentametrocrinus sempert.
Budiocrinus japonicus, 8p. DOV----------+-22--7 77777550 Pentametrocrinus japonicus.
38 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
(Specimens in the Hamburg Museum.)
Tropiometra andouini.
Tropiometra encrinus.
Tropiometra carinata.
Tropiometra picta.
Avitedon COANOIG. 2 see ce eee eae cee elem
Antedon levipinna, sp. NOV ....---.---------------------- Lamprometra protectus.
Antedon xquipinna, sp. NOV.. ...-.---------------------- Lamprometra protectus.
Antedon imparipinna, sp. NOV.....--.---------------------Lamprometra protectus.
Antedon variipinna, sp. NOV..-.....---------------------- Amphimetra variipinna.
Antedon crenulata, sp. NOV.........-----------+-+--------- Amphimetra crenulata.
Antedon acuticirra, 8p. NOV. ....-...-.----..--.------------ Craspedometra acuticirra.
Antedony LUdOMICL, BPs) DOVs eos ee ane alas a= ael= onelnle mini l= Craspedometra acuticirra.
Antedon bipartipinna, sp. NOV...--------------------------Craspedometra acuticirra.
(Antedon australis, nom. nov.) -...---.------------------- Craspedometra acuticirra,
SACI ITLOENA GO Lane sa aan erene ae aie aa eie i= ee rem ie Comatula solaris.
Actinometra robusta, 8p. NOV......---------+---+---+----- Comatula solaris.
PA CIUTOM EUR UNC NO noe eee ols aia nia are ain a = aie inelm miele a= Comanthus parvicirra.
Actinometra multiradiata. ©... <2. 5... 2c eceen + sce sees ses ee ee aged: :
Capillaster multiradiata.
Actinometra grandicalyx, sp. NOV..------------------------ Comantheria grandicalyx.
Actinometra meyeri, Sp. NOV...----- Ba) Sees iets miners Comanthus annulata.
SACHINOMERE DENNEN comm ee ecole tne Selo sia =~ Selenite sie Comanthus bennetti.
In the same year Prof. F. Jeffrey Bell invented a very ingenious, but unfortu-
nately impracticable, scheme for the expression of the specific characters of the
comatulids by means of so-called “specific formule,” and gave a list of all the
species known to him with their specific formule attached; in this list he inserted
the names of some undescribed species which had been obtained by the Alert in
Australia, and he added an appendix describing Actinometra annulata (Comanthus
annulata) from Cape York. Later in the same year he very briefly diagnosed a
new form from the Straits of Magellan, Antedon magellanica (Florometra magell-
anica), treating it as a variety of the arctic Heliometra glacialis.
It was in 1882 also that Greeff reported the occurrence at the island of Rolas
in the Gulf of Guinea, near Sio Thomé, of a comatulid which he called Antedon rosa-
cea, but which is probably the same as the species afterwards named by Hartlaub,
from specimens obtained on the Ivory Coast, Antedon hupferi. This curious
species is the west African representative of the Brazilian Antedon diibenii and of
the European Antedon bifida. ;
Early in the following year Carpenter reviewed Bell’s system of formulation,
pointed out numerous errors, and gave a revised list of all the species which he
could determine; and Prof. Edmond Perrier diagnosed a new species of Eudiocrinus,
E. atlanticus (Pentametrocrinus atlanticus). The genus Eudiocrinus was hitherto
supposed to be peculiar to the Pacifie—being in fact named for the Pacific Ocean—
and the discovery of a species in the Bay of Biscay was an occurrence of more than
ordinary interest.
In 1883 also Prof. Percival de Loriol discussed the echinoderms of Mauritius,
noting the occurrence there of Tropiometra carinata.
The report on the collections made by H. M. S. Alert in Australian and East
African waters was published by Bell in 1884. In it certain species, badly in need
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 39
of redescription, were recorded with no data but the localities, others were given
erroneous and misleading diagnoses, the species briareus was again, as in 1882,
referred to “Antedon” instead of to ‘ Actinometra”’ where it belonged, and some
of the names conferred in 1882 were shifted about and applied to quite different
species.
The Australian species included in the Alert report are:
PAW LEO TEU ICOTIE ae ee eens eee aaa sao eal { Tropto TREO BE ON
Oligometrides adeonzx.
Amphimetra milberti.
Antedon milberti.......-------2------- 2-2-2 e errr |smeknar discoidea.
Oligometra carpentert.
Antedon pinniformis...-.--------++-------+22222 corr Oligometrides adeonz.
Antedon carpenteri, 8p. MOV..--------------+222722220 ttt Oligometra carpentert.
Antedon pumila, sp. NOV..-------------+-+-2222 272000 tt tro
(=Antedon loveni, 1882)-.---.---------+++222-22500000t7
Antedon bidens, sp. NOV. .-------------------+++ 222200000 -Oligometrides adeonz.
Antedon loveni, sp. NOV..----------+-++---+-- 202000
(=Antedon insignis, 1882)..-----------+++--------7 20707777
\ Compsometra loveni.
}Colobometra perspinosa.
Antedon decipiens, sp. NOV. ----------------+-----7 7777 5r tt Amphimetra crenulata.
Antedon reging, 8p. NOV. .----------------++----22 705575000 Lamprometra gyges.
Antedon articulata.......---------+-------+2-25520e0r tert Liparometra articulata.
Antedon gyges, SP. DOV- --------------- +++ +2222 2 2c Lamprometra gyges.
Antedon irregularis, sp. NOV.---------------+--+---777770 7007 _Amphimetra crenulata.
Antedon elegans, 8p. NOV.---------------+-------7700tr ttt Zygometra elegans.
Antedon briareus, 8p. NOV. .-------------------22- 2050 r rte Comantheria briareus.
Antedon microdiscus, 8p. NOV..---------------+-2-205 ttt ttre Zygometra microdiscus.
Actinometra solaris...--.------------------+20 corr Comaiula solaris.
Actinometra albonotata, sp. NOV. .----------------------77777> -Comatula solaris.
Actinometra intermedia, sp. NOV. ---------------------77 77 77> Comatula solaris.
Actinometra robusta...----------+------+ +020 r rrr Comatula solaris.
Actinometra strota....------------------++--7 2222220 t Comatula solaris.
Actinometra cumingii....-------+--+-+--+--27tr rr etrr Comanthus parvicirra.
Actinometra coppingeri, 8p. NOV------------------- 7257057 Capillaster multiradiata.
Actinometra jukesi...--------------7 70222 et trc rt Comatula rotalaria.
Actinometra parvicirra..-..------------2+077-0orr nett Comanthus parvicirra.
Actinometra alternans....------------------27070ccrt te Comantheria alternans.
Actinometra paucicirra, 8p. DOV----------------2+520050 rrr Comatula rotalaria
Actinometra multifida.....------------+-+72 cre ct rcrtn { Gominates WUE ee
Comanthina schlegelit.
5; aie Comaster typica.
Actinometra variabilis, sp. DOV. .-----------+++---77000 07> heal y ltifida,
Actinometra, sp. jUV------------------ 7200 t tr Comatula pectinata.
The east African species included in the Alert report is:
Actinomelnas Sp-s-/2= 2-2-2 s2s- 222 ot ee ae Comissia ignota.
In 1884 also P. H. Carpenter diagnosed his remarkable new genus Thaumato-
crinus, which recently has been shown to be only the young of a species belonging
to one section of his genus Promachocrinus, the section which was included by
Minckert in 1905 in his new genus Decametrocrinus, over which name Thawmatocri-
nus has, of course, priority.
In the same year that the Alert report was published P. H. Carpenter also pub-
lished an account of the crinoids occurring between the Faeroe Islands and Gib-
40 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
raltar, mainly based upon the results of the work of the Porcupine expedition, and
he also finished the monograph on the stalked crinoids which had been obtained by
the Challenger. This latter is much more comprehensive in scope than is indicated
by its title, for it includes a valuable discussion of the morphology both of the coma-
tulids and of the stalked species.
In 1885 Bell published a list of the Australian crinoids which had been sent to
the International Fisheries Exhibition in London. This list was published in New
South Wales, and was the first contribution to the study of the recent crinoids,
properly identified as such, to be printed in Australia.
Bell in 1887 reported upon a collection of echinoderms from the Andaman
Islands, which included a single crinoid; this he refrained from naming, as the same
species alsa occurred in a collection from the Mergui Archipelago that had been
assigned to Carpenter for report. Carpenter later called it Antedon andersoni
(Pontiometra andersoni).
In the year 1888 the great Challenger report was published, which, though
based upon the Challenger collections, amounts to a complete and thorough mono-
graph of the group; this work brought the knowledge of the comatulids up to date,
and has ever since served as a foundation upon which authors have built.
The following classification of the comatulids was adopted by Carpenter in
this volume:
“J. Crinoids with the calyx closed below by the enlarged top joint of the larval stem, which
develops cirriand generally separates from the stem joints below it, so that the calyx is free. The
basals may form a more or less complete ring on the exterior of the calyx, or be only represented by an
internal rosette. Five or ten rays, either simple or more or less divided. The first axillary is the
second, or (very rarely) the first, joint above the calyx-radials. Definite interradial plates usually
absent. The mouth central, except in one genus.
Family Comatulidx d’Orbigny.
A. Centro-dorsal has no articular facet on its lower surface.
a. Five rays.
i. Mouth central or subcentral. Oral pinnules have no comb.
Radials separated by interradials....................-..-..--- 1. Thaumatocrinus.
Radials united laterally.
1. Basals persist as a closed ring. No pinnules on lower
prachiala 32.5 [5k se. eee ese sos ewan iae se ee te ACERT
2. Basal ring incomplete or invisible externally.
Ee ive anma only. 5 «<<< 165 <isin ede ola dome osialosmeiele 3. Budiocrinus.
EDS Tenvarms $3.55 oss Vessac tees cectececee aeeaee sae 4, Antedon.
ii. Mouth excentric or marginal. Oral pinnules havea terminalcomb. 5. Actinometra.
Dy SLOMTRYBr conccocccescsic ea ceaeere Beet ciaaee webingas sale cectceeeese cece 6. Promachocrinus.
B. Centro-dorsal has an articular facet below...................-.---+------- 7. Thiolliericrinus.”’
These genera contained in all 188 recent species, divided among them as follows:
PETAR ULLO PANS 36 os or i ois seg BE Le oe ele pT a el a a uy
SRIBIECTETEUBS oa So 2s pines te So ioc Ape eee Cp oe eC Be oS a eee 3
TOLER OUINTNAS once owner ole oe ee rae ORL TER OE CREE Eee ee 5
PUN TL Na eee St Sle ay IRE SS reg eh ait 8: A ns SE oy 2 Bi te Ve 122
BCHNOMEING Bind o's ele - Bois Geen SS wole se he Ree Re 54
PrOovunchocranuss. 2. 2.25 de axe shee ase habee ee ae. ee 3
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. Al
Carpenter did not subdivide the genera Antedon and Actinometra, but he
arranged the species in a number of more or less well defined groups for the better
appreciation of their differential specific characters (but not of their specific inter-
relationships), as follows:
ANTEDON.
Series I. The two outer radials united by syzygy. (This includes only the
“Elegans group”; Carpenter did not employ this name in the Challenger
report, introducing it for the first time in his report on the comatulids of
the Mergui Archipelago, 1889.)
Series II. The two outer radials articulated; 10 arms.
The radials and lower brachials have flattened sides; pinnule ambulacra
generally plated cat 2s\< - omenasios sme Sac ee seis weicioe sm paec c/cisas 1. “Basicurva group.”
The rays not flattened laterally. Pinnule-ambulacra well plated....... 2. ‘‘Acela group.”
The first two or three pairs of pinnules long and flagellate, with numerous
BOD Gt UO ay Oj OLIM GS mere eereeta tate aye teste tattet eter tsar) ay atestarerats clare 3. ““Eschrichti group.”’
The joints of the lowest pinnules, which are often long and slender, are
longer than wide, frequently very much so......-........-.-------- 4. “Tenella group.”
The first pair of pinnules is comparatively small, and their joints but
little longer than wide; one or more of the second, third, and fourth
pairs are longer and more massive, with stouter joints than their suc-
(CEO ere ete te tet tate ete te olan lala teeter te et 5. ‘‘ Milberti group.”’
There are in addition six 10-armed species which Carpenter does not assign to
any of the preceding groups.
Series III. Two articulated distichals.
Bidistichate species with the radial axillaries and some of the following
joints more or less wall-sided, and a well marked ambulacral skeleton
onthe pinnules= see sero nemesis eae wee eles nie'= wtelats stars elereeerelste 6. “‘Spinifera group.”
Bidistichate species with an unplated disk and no definite ambulacral
skeleton. The sides of the lower brachials are scarcely, if at all,
flattened. The first pinnule smaller than its successors.........-.-.- 7. ‘‘Palmata group.”’
Series IV. Three distichals, the first two articulated, the third axillary with a
syzysy-
Tridistichate species with plated ambulacra and the lower parts of the
TN let HOMO LOL Ye ete apatite ote 8. “Granulifera group.”
Tridistichate species with an unplated disk and no definite ambulacral
skeleton; the bases of the raysare not flattened laterally............. 9. ‘“Savignyi group.”’
ACTINOMETRA.
Series I. The two outer radials and the two first brachials respectively united
by syzygy.
BST NEAT Se at a aoa ott ree 1. “Solaris group.”
Two distichals, united by syzygy.-.----------------------------------. 2. “Paucicirra group.”’
Three distichals, the axillary a syzygy-..-.------------.---.----.--.-- 3. “‘Typica group.”
Series II. The two outer radials articulated; 10 arms...........--- ee ---- 4. “Echinoptera group.”
Series III. Two articulated distichals.
Two articulated distichals. The palmars and subsequent series, when
present, are of the same character; but the first two brachials are
TINIE VARY ZY BY ee ee 3 ale = tae la tole e oti telat la laine ete 5. ee group.”
Two articulated distichals; the first arm syzygy in the third baiecbaiee “‘Valida group.”’
79146°—Bull. 82—15——4
42 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Series IV. Three distichals, the first two articulated, and the third axillary
with a syzygy.
Tridistichate species with a pinnule on the first brachial and a syzygy in
the second. The palmar and post-palmar series, when present, con-
sist of two joints, the first bearing a pinnule, and the second axillary
WAHL ABV RYE Vins aceon ee tee mete mee tee mater te oon ion imi=in 7. ‘‘Fimbriata group.”
Tridistichate species, with a pinnule on the second brachial and a syzygy
TTT PNG GIR 2 fata eee en oite siete eee here ni wate = Blom intel meal aie 8. ‘‘Parvicirra group.”
The following species of comatulids were considered as valid by Carpenter,
and were included by him in the Challenger report:
THAUMATOCRINUS.
Thaumatocrinus renovatus........--------------+--+---- Thaumatocrinus renovatus.
ATELECRINUS.
Atelacrinus OLanOVdes = 2 ext aalmntm ale sie wim nto farnn afm == alae Atelecrinus balanoides.
ALelerranitie AYN oe acne eters oat toe nie) emia etalvia Atelecrinus wyvillii.
VA TELECYATAUG CUDENIBES tet ete sin een ae oe ie isos cece Atelecrinus balanoides.
EUDIOCRINUS.
FAUOCHINUS TNOWISUS ws ao 5,5 a ace ome aioe ionic es mas oe Budiocrinus indivisus.
POUMO CHINAS VATIONS «ca daa scan cae rscis sisiele'winte's nas ee Se Pentametrocrinus varians.
TRACROCUTIUS RENUDEN «oo nino crete sain eee nee ie ae nae iain Pentametrocrinus semperi.
Thin pon Gos Cee japonicus.
alles ea i i a a Be Pentametrocrinus tuberculatus.
OUCROCTAYUUG CULQVLRCIES crater a) aie mye feel ale stem ieee es Pentametrocrinus atlanticus.
ANTEDON.
Sertes I.
AntedonsUChlans- 5-05 one ioe acne chen ceeeconces Zygometra elegans.
AMtEdON TUL AGI AO. ote ewe erate fois eteie le eiae aja Zygometra microdiscus.
ATited ON TRACT OUNSCIRS ae Schon ate alae ee ele ee eer Zygometra microdiscus.
Series II.
“ Basicurva group.”
ANLEAON: LONGICNTO aaa causa laiat Ase Eoin om sia aR ee Asterometra longicirra.
Antedon Malis arent coee ais caisinntoie Samer ee eee ee Aglaometra valida.
ANTEAON WENO an 6 Ses a we soos ww ce a elem Binley eet Nore Aglaometra incerta.
ANLEAON GTACHIS® aos fais ee Vere scien se ate nee ech Thalassometra pergracilis
PA niledomy) ULSWANACTE = foro wloe v wre os cee eee eee Thalassometra lusitanica.
PANLEGON UT CUITUMU ooo oc concn kno os Sos Ae Stiremetra breviradia.
PAOLO BIRT T naan ania ee oe ee eee eae Stiremetra spinicirra.
PATITENON (CUETO. 2 os camiee to ocean thee ae eee Stiremetra acutiradia.
Antedon Giepinosa os . Se os ck tee oe a Thalassometra bispinosa.
Antedon: ANP UINE = 3. ane Fo Sew ae aos Bae ee Lee Thalassometra latipinna.
Aritedon Mulan: . 2c coos seemed <2. pees yee Thalassometra multispina.
Antedon échinatac = set oes Sai aes 232 ee ne Thalassometra echinata.
Antedon basicurva eels data a aonk ae mE Oey asic ane See eee Charitometra basicurva.
WA SILECOVRMAONS Cc 2-228 )icheee ys eee E CIN WS StS eae Charitometra incisa.
ATBOOT MUDPT ORG 2 occ 8 7 Ate Ne sae Pu ee saeneeete Glyptometra tuberosa.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING
Antedon parvipinna
Antedon flewilis......------------+-++2+-2222--2-22----
TA TiEEdOTNACILLEA LES amet awioin = oeiaie ee lelaleiei= = ==) =I
Antedon denticulata
Antedon pusilla
WAri ted OTC Lat eee ale oie le os tee oa areal =i ==
Antedon discoidea
“ Eschrichti group.”
Antedon eschrichti
Antedon antarctica
Antedon australis
Antedon rhomboidea
Antedon quadrata
Antedon magellanica
{
“ Tenella group.”
Antedon phalangium
Antedon hystrix
Antedon prolixa
{
|
Antedon tenella
Antedon exigua
Antedon alternata
Antedon rosacea
Antedon petasus
Antedon diibeni
Antedon lineata
Antedon remota
Antedon longipinna
Antedon tenuicirra
Antedon lxvis
Antedon hirsuta
Antedon angustipinna
Antedon abyssorum. . --------++---+++02rrtetttrt tree
Antedon abyssicola....---------++++++++ 222220007 707+ {
|
“ Milberti group.”
Antedon pinniformis
Antedon serripinna
Antedon carpentert
CRINOIDS. 438
Strotometra parvipinna.
Pachylometra flexilis.
Chlorometra aculeata.
Pecilometra acela.
Calometra discoidea.
Heliometra glacialis.
Solanometra antarctica.
Solanometra antarctica.
Florometra magellanica.
Heliometra glacialis.
Florometra magellanica.
Leptometra phalangium.
Leptometra celtica.
Hathrometra prolixa.
Hathrometra prolixa.
(All the smaller species belonging to
the genus Hathrometra.)
Hathrometra exigua.
Thaumatometra alternata.
Thaumatometra cypris.
Trichometra persina.
Antedon bifida.
Antedon moroccana.
Antedon hupferi.
Antedon mediterranea.
Antedon adriatica.
Antedon petasus.
Antedon diibenii.
Tropiometra picta.
Tsometra angustipinna,
Thaumatometra remota.
Thaumatometra longipinna.
Thysanometra tenuicirra.
Thaumatometra levis.
Eumorphometra hirsuta.
Tsometra angustipinna.
Thaumatometra abyssorum.
Bathymetra abyssicola.
Bathymetra carpenteri.
Amphimetra pinniformis.
Oligometra serripinna.
Oligometra carpenteri.
44 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
PA TALON PUMA. son coe emeee eam ote annie ce =e eee =a Compsometra loveni.
Amphimetra milberti.
Antaion milbertis..- csi eee nee =e. shee erat eeeee Amphimetra mélleri.
Amphimetra discoidea.
Antedon levissima 2.52 see he tee e none 5042 bane Amphimetra levissima.
PAMIIACON: LESROL UAT = enema neee one a eel ee eee ee eee (?)
Antadore perepinos@ ofan <= oe 2 ss aia tee ee Colobometra perspinosa.
PAIGLOQOYY ONCE 208 ere emo eteene ercle oiet s ee Amphimetra anceps.
Antedon VAVWPINNls sce s< coe ses om chine lima = sine <i cieee Amphimetra crenulata.
Tropiometra encrinus.
Tropiometra carinata.
ANLEAON: COMMA == os oo Se eee Hee a= eels eas saa Tropiometra indica.
Tropiometra audouini.
Tropiometra picta.
AnledOn: POTUCOUTE =< ae elms aoe = eee sess Jes ane sees Tridometra parvicirra.
Antedon <n formas. 2s-5. de team scl-eese cis sehen ce ere Decametra informis.
Antedon lovent 5s. et eee ee as oni s eee ese ESE Colobometra perspinosa.
The six following 10-armed species do not fall into any of the groups previously
given:
Antedon! dens 722 oe ccs ste ae ie epee so ssa soe see Oligometrides adeonx.
Antedon: CdeOn tren. ante cees oh nana wN oetiea nose Oligometrides adeonz.
Antecon jist inirl see a ne ees ee te Amphimetra milberti.
Arledon Galenouiee en sos toet Nees ee Se ae eens Balanometra balanoides.
AUGON Ae feciemra = ser a ane ae ene sne eee Hypalometra defecta.
MntedonAmPVn nace ae cio venetian as (?)
Six other 10-armed species are mentioned by name, but are not discussed;
these are:
ARLEN OTMOAUI saat cen tees Yee alee eee Kee Analcidometra armata.
Antadon: breviminnds nosaee eee 5.5 ee ne tes cesee a (?)
PANLEAOM COULNNONAE = mn Ske bye 5 sacs, 5. one see coes Zenometra columnaris.
sAmtedoT CUben site eo Sees 8 ais so eee caine seein Antedon cubensis.
Anitedon du plern® sextet ea Ae oo i Sas cea elena bes nie Horxometra duplex.
pAntelOn uLgenN eet ~ bitte so ctoe Usa. ee eee) Coccometra hagenii.
Serigs III.
“Spinifera group.”
anny macronema.
Ptilometra miilleri.
Antedon quinquecostata.<. 2 ~..<i2-.0220000050ckesesecss Stenometra quinquecostata.
PANLEROTY BINNS er One n sees ee ae 6 sas Sosa: oe eee Stylometra spinifera.
pA ntelon i diip les ieee, US Vee Nee 2 Le Se ee Oe ce aS Horxometra duplex.
Anitetory iuetaritca Me ene Gah BI ee Thalassometra lusitanica.
ATUELON fERblie 3-2 Se OTM Bete ONE Pachylometra flerilis.
ANtedon pibisite. 223" - tee eee ce. een Pachylometra patula.
PATRON TOUUBA Choco 2 are es oe, eae Pachylometra robusta.
PATIBAON DON UAEM os. oo. 5 ee Crinometra granulifera.
Antmion bre niving: <6, ibe een occ.) Crinometra brevipinna.
(eae compressa.
Parametra granulifera.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 45
“ Palmata group.”
PANLEAONINOANCH AS Pena ere efe ene ais inane 2 aie e as ate Cyllometra manca.
PAM LECOTL CLS CU ONTIUS -teteteetatate) =e miele ee eae 2 ae Cyllometra disciformis.
Antedon clemeénsmree mae saean nas ase dene a= se aetoa= = =a Amphimetra anceps.
PAT LECOTU MON GULL eee ae oat o eee reesei ee omnis Stephanometra marginata.
Anitedon tubercular ces Ss 2 Sa sae sinc dsc cies eee Stephanometra tuberculata.
SANULEMO SDVCL LM ret see nein ini == ela ie= ee eels =a = ae ie Stephanometra spicata.
PA TELECON TAU ae reso a= eran 2 Soci ae ae che sie eerie = Stephanometra indica.
BA NtedOTePROCE Cla pho mera. 3\ op aia;n (o's xjaiaeeis wratat ae Nataia efela(as ==) Lamprometra protectus.
CA mteloT CONG UT ENS a wear a = ola soo) ato ea Ee 1c eae Lamprometra protectus.
PANLELOTNE GUY PUN etn sata l= a eos ae este aisle Lamprometra protectus.
PAM LEUOTY LEWICUTO =< a12 15 hae aicioerate asta eae eee Lamprometra protectus.
PAM TEMOTALIN DOTS PANG nee areola eee ere oe Lamprometra protectus.
PAN TECON RENIN omer cnysie ise ees Saas Sei = Lamprometra gyges.
Antedon gyges....--- a eR Seren Stee ete or Lamprometra gyges.
PATULCOOTO TO UITUO LO aa meee ice totstaerotte eat tetas eto at Lamprometra palmate.
PAN LEAON) DV EVUCUM EAL = aie erate ia rnise seas = meee sale sine = Lamprometra protectus.
JU OUD SH ON Oeste trem arin a eadenabosadcnsscicoDeOenne Lamprometra similis.
Antedon occultans. 25-82 e ae sere ce asec senes- se Lamprometra protectus.
SAM LEMONY OUEICIIOLO ee ee ena oe eee eee ean a Inparometra articulata.
WA TLLECOTTEG OLS aap ee eee ear ere relate im aletaier Iiparometra regalis.
eAnitedon Clon gatas seq =) \asaerne = om aia aie )saseie oases ime > a Dichrometra flagellata.
SA LedON LAG ella erasers eee iale neato tenia = Dichrometra flagellata.
Antedonibimaculaton scp. 22 sao s ss cee ese senee + Dichrometra bimaculata.
Series IV.
“Granulifera group.”
PATIL CAOTOT GO USCUCULY Ie a ena eels see ieee eae ae Pachylometra angusticalyz.
PA TERCCOTU TILL QUES see teetal atelier ea Pachylometra inxqualis.
PATILCAOTGR ONAL Yer. ae eee ee eerste ieee er Crinometra imbricata.
PAntedons GStin Cle aere encase ea ee ieee ieee a= Pachylometra distincta.
VAT LEAO TU NILLETS T7170 eae eet ate ea etal Thalassometra multispina.
VAN ECON DONT ECLOa ets eee ee tater eee etre Crotalometra porrecta.
“ Savignyi group.”
PATHELON QTUGUSEN COLO == eas sate ae ee ee ea Adelometra angustiradia.
PATE ONU TEU ITAU Cena tal- ta oleae eee ae ae ree Heterometra reynaudit.
PA TILEROTUEGWIGNY Uaee seers nee aie =n ie sisal Heterometra savignit.
VAT LEMOTNCTICE DS se ee ios hola teresa ieler ata ale alia Amphimetra anceps.
a phimetra crenulata.
Antedon variipinna.........---+----+--+-+-+-++----- Amphimetra variipinna,
Antedon quinduplicava.......---.-.------------------ Heterometra quinduplicave.
PAN teHOT UCULUCUT Waa malate = ai lm =m alee =)= li Craspedometra acuticirra.
PAMTECOTIIULEO UIC Ieee eas ne ea = ieee ee aie ati Craspedometra acuticirra.
Antedon philiberti..........-.---------+--+--------=-- Amphimetra philiberti.
Antedon bipartipinna.......-.------------+-----++---- Craspedometra acuticirra.
ACTINOMETRA.
“ Solaris group.”
Comatula purpurea.
Comatula pectinata.
VACHNOMEIRC SOLOING. smc sc eo cence eee See ile Canalo ow Comatula solaris.
Actinometra brachiolata.......--------+--+--++---+---+> Comatulella brachiolata.
Actinometra pectinata.......-----+-------+-+-+---++--- {
46
BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
“ Paucicirra group.”
Actinometra PQucicirrd.......sccceeeeeeeeeee sere en eeee= Comatula rotalaria.
Actinometra distincla: <<... - 20. 255. D2 geen cece nce tces Comaster distincta.
ActenO metry Cy Diu ee ote ole te sta mito etetw nc = ona Comaster typica. .
Actinometra NOv#-GuUine#.......2. 20-2002 e cence eee e ees Comaster novxguinex.
Actinometra multibrachiata..........--- nicl aroin Ao kere attenie Comaster multibrachiata.
Series II.
“ Echinoptera group.”’
Actinometra echinoptera.............---+--+--+-+-+-------Comactinia echinoptera.
Actrriometra pulchella=s.-9 eee sae oc <8 eax wa sonic ies Comactinia echinoptera.
Actinometra blakei (nomen nudum).....-...--.--------- (?)
Actinometra meridionalis..........-..------------------Comactinia meridionalis.
Series III.
“ Stelligera group.”’
Neocomatella alata.
Aolinowietereppdcatin oe a ae eee ene Neocomatella atlantica.
Neocomatella europxa.
Palxocomatella difficilis.
ACHNOMENG MACUL so62 3 foto sass eee Seen cee Comatella maculata.
Achnometa slelligera-s 225-22 = sss Dae eee cence cee tee Comatella stelligera.
Achinomet a NigTi=s.-S25. «0a o cede Seip en coee ok Comatella nigra.
“ Valida group.”
ACtiNOMERGBLONG CED a0 in a aioe 3 ax Foo siamese eine wisi Comanthus parvicirra.
ACUMOMEIN SUNDICL eis PE oon cing om on eee aeons ieee Comanthus parvicirra.
ALCURTLOMEL OT OMIUIING arate nctere oaravoscinie 2 /-foinin c= ve CS Comanthus parvicirra.
Achinometra MONAG enn kes ane sats oe soe yates eels Comanthus annulata.
Series IV.
“ Fimbriata group.”
Achnometa jUnUTIalas oo eae saa: else oes aie ee ee Capillaster multiradiata.
ALENOMEECODDINGEN «= oe ctia = eee ee e OE Capillaster multiradiata.
Actinometra borneensis........--..- nie ett Eni eer Capillaster multiradiata.
Capillaster marizx.
Actinometra multiradiata..........----.200200002e000- Capillaster multiradiata.
Capillaster coccodistoma.
Actinometra Senvond ccc: soc 2 eos SEN eee Capillaster sentosa.
Arhnomnstra Winbatis os. 2% sons Ses oan oa ae eee ee Nemaster lineata.
Actinometra discoidea (nomen nudum)...........-.-.--- (?)
“ Parvicirra group.”
Comanthus annulata.
Achmomettn partici Tayssneacs 2c Sencar ons eee Comanthus Pees
Comanthus parvicirra.
: Comaster distincta.
Actinometra quadrata..........- SaaS ate eee Comanthus parvicirra.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 47
rActinometn a tmicho pled sary nae se) eye Cee see Se Comanthus trichoptera.
PACHINOMEN A JAPOTICI Ee nee eee ene an = es Comanthus japonica.
PACH NOME OG MUU lddeeereeeeeaee see ses see = ee acl Comaster multifida.
PA CHINO MEM ALUOTIC DUIS eee eeee ate yniy ae cio eie =e Jomaster multifida.
Actinometra grandicalyx.............-----------.-------Comantheria grandicalyz.
Actinometra alternans........-.---.-.---------.--------Comantheria alternans.
PA CLIN ONLEETOAU MATEUS nae Aas se es eree elaine eiresee elaine Comantheria briareus.
PACH NO MEL OOVVETROOO 2 mains aise wee = oes sing els = = Comantheria briareus.
Actinometia;MAQnificd= 2 = = ne = ae eee a= = fepisee Comantheria magnifica.
EA CLIN OMELTONOCLL Dano Netto arse Seta eee ee we Comaster belli.
A ChiNOMENG CUPLED =a a 22s aa ss = 311s 2,2) oso y=) sions se 3 5 Comanthina schlegelii.
VA CHINOMEM A MOUWIS se 2 ean ager etree iets Comanthina schlegelit.
Actinometra robustipinna..........-----.--------------Himerometra robustipinna.
Actinometra UiHtOnGlise. -seee oe cee ace sess oe Comanthus annulata.
Actinometraregauiss~sscent. eins seen = tie = See - esi Comanthina schlegelii.
Actinonelta Schiegelncus. 02-5 eaneas Jae sees oa 3 Comanthina schlegelii.
PA CEIMO MEN GD ENON sata mata mane eerie mame a) =intaie ial Comanthus bennett.
FACEINOMEL CI UCTEREC se rate Sat santa) erat aerate srerciel sl Comanthus bennetti.
PROMACHOCRINUS.
Promachocrinus kerguelensis......-....---------------- Promachocrinus kerguelensis.
‘Promachocrinusiabyssorwin= 3. = - = - 2 eas oe eee = Thaumatocrinus renovatus.
IPT OM OCKOCRUTULS TILL CR tater eer te ete eee erase Thaumatocrinus nares.
Besides the systematic account of the various species, the Challenger report
contains a vast amount of information on the morphology of ecrinoids, and an
exhaustive discussion of the relation between the recent and the fossil species.
Most of this, however, is included in the volume on the stalked crinoids published
in 1884.
The myzostomes found upon the crinoids which were studied by Carpenter
were, as previously noted, sent to Prof. Ludwig von Graff, who reported upon them
in four papers (1877, 1883, 1884, and 1887) in which he included many manuscript
names which had been furnished him by Carpenter and by Semper.
In the same year that the Challenger report was published Bell reported upon
a small collection of crinoids which had been sent him by Mr. J. Bracebridge Wilson
from Port Phillip, Victoria; among them were two forms which he described as new,
under the names of Antedon wilsoni (Ptilometra macronema, juv.), and A. incommoda
( Compsometra incommoda).
In 1889 Professor Bell reported upon a collection of echinoderms made at
Tuticorin, in the Madras presidency, by Mr. Edgar Thurston, and also upon some
echinoderms obtained off the southwest coast of Ireland. Mr. James A. Grieg also
recorded some crinoids which had been dredged in Vestlandske Fjord.
Professor Bell had received some additional examples of the species which he
had described in the Alert report as Antedon pumila, and had discovered that the
first pinnule was the longest, and not short as he had stated, he having been misled
by the broken condition of the original specimens. His Antedon incommoda was
supposed to differ from the earlier A. pumila through the greater length of the first
pinnule, but this difference being now shown to be nonexistent, he now relegated
the former to the synonymy of the latter, though, curiously enough, the two are
well differentiated on other characters.
48 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
The chief paper of the year was Carpenter's account of the comatulids of the
Mergui Archipelago, based upon a collection made by Mr. John Anderson. In this
paper the following comatulids are noticed:
ATLAAOT CLI OMS ae te eraee ata ee een aa este arete pinta ania) ate aVarole\e wiele = ete Zygometra comata,
Antedon andéreonicBPRUOVeee: oc. ec seems tic ei. so nanisateclseieers Pontiometra andersoni.
Antec logis eet ee ancien oa cele isis a ninis nis aeiee ete ates Amphimetra milberti.
ANLECOTE SOUCOLO are en iw aiarsols Soicte swine = ets (eer Stephanometra spicata.
ANLedOM CONFUNG ENS a ane lam a into aloe elrninle oe = ine esetent~ Lamprometra protectus.
eA Chinometra OLA Ape NOV =e socom <= (sie ams ae Saigo = miele Comatella stelligera.
The difficulties attending the use of the various specific groups instituted by
Carpenter were first brought to notice by this article, for he referred Actinometra
notata to the ‘ Paucicirra group” in which he described it as a new species near
Act. paucicirra; it really belongs in the “Stelligera group,” and had Carpenter
placed it here he would have seen at once that it is the same as the Actinometra
stelligera described at great length in the Challenger report. It is in this paper that
Carpenter gives to the Series I of Antedon the name of “‘ Elegans group;”’ at first he
had considered the single species represented in the collection as new, and when he
sent some myzostomes which he found upon it to Professor von Graff he gave him
the name of Antedon comata for it. Later he decided that it was the same as the
Australian species described by Bell, and suppressed the name. It has been recently
shown, however, that his first decision was correct.
Aside from some papers of purely local interest, the chief contribution in 1890
was the preliminary paper by Dr. Clemens Hartlaub describing a large number of
new forms from the Indian Ocean. The complete work on the littoral comatulid
fauna of the “Indian Archipelago” appeared in 1891; it is exhaustive in its treat-
ment, and, besides most excellent descriptions (accompanied by figures) of all the
new species, includes redescriptions of many imperfectly known forms, taken from
the types. During the preparation of this work Hartlaub was in constant com-
munication with Dr. P. H. Carpenter, to whom he referred several of the more
difficult problems; it thus comes to have an additional authoritativeness, as it
embodies to a certain extent conclusions reached by Carpenter from a study of
material upon which he never published. Hartlaub identified many of Liitken’s
nomina nuda, placing them correctly in the synonymy.
The species considered by Hartlaub are:
AMIedOn: DENGUIENSS |AD (DOW ashe). eee ee = eee eae Heterometra bengalensis.
ANLEdON UITENAT RD TOV sate ek: one Semen oe ee Himerometra martensi.
BATION Kr Ae DEANAS BD. NOV ieaeiecoc ee ene oe te ee ee Himerometra robustipinna.
Antedon Grockst, Bp: NOV: 5254-5 0 NN Ce ee es Amphimetra variipinna.
SANLECON A AiVAS; (SP. NOV eo oe OS eee. See ee Heterometra affinis.
Antedonmematodon: ap! mov 825.255: Sco. ado once eee Amphimetra nematodon.
Antedon ludovici [ee ee amboinx.
Craspedometra acuticirra.
ANUOGON CTASMPINNG, BP. NOV... ---6-- 1-52... nn ee Himerometra robustipivna.
ANILEGOW CUD IC Bp: NOV: oe cue eee ee Petasometra clarx.
Antedow bella, Spi novils. ios.) ak J 23-bit Cenometra bella.
Antedon bella, var. brunnea, var. nov ...................-- Cenometra brunnea.
Antedon kiinsingert, Bp: NOV... .c sss: 0se- us case eee Lamprometra palmata.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 49
PAmtedon finschtixSpsnON eee as = css -istaetahias Aaisicis sae caclae seni Oxymetra finschii.
Antedon palmata......----.------ SEU E SRO CBP ABER ESaeeerisse lead UE
Lamprometra protectus.
PAMLEHON CRINALEGNAD DOVE Rime ets aoe eC eas en's oeiccce ae ee oe Oxymetra erinacea.
Antedon tenuipinna, sp. noy ...---.---- ee eel ee Stephanometra tenuipinna.
‘Antedon oxyacantna,| Sp; NOV)..--2 22.00) 02 02sec eee e esses Stephanometra oxyacantha.
Antedon monacantha, sp. Nov ...-.-....---------------------Stephanometra monacantha.
PANLCAONSPANIMINTA; BP. WOVe ae a aise aia) = lacie = ot Stephanometra spinipinna.
SAALELOTUUME OTE UT IU wares afer a Sle ae aici aera) = oS ania Lamprometra protectus.
TAmicdonitenera:; BD. NOV = -5- sas = 5 ais ce sam mimes 4s slomis ease Lamprometra gyges.
Amt edOnHOTEVtCUNENLD)e aire ots eee ee steee = sais =e 2 .---Lamprometra protectus.
PAMEEMOTN CLOTHS OL atom sew =e tna een er aS ate elmo eee ten :
tAmtedon flagellata® 2 =tese. cout ch oe soe a toss eee ae | Dichrometra Jegeliate.
PATCH OTN CON EN OAS): hLOVianinne neem ee rn SP arse els ola) state te Cosmiometra conifera.
PAM LEAOTITACT OTLEN ate aaa ata ae ent aa are ee a Ptilometra miilleri.
PANTEAOTY OTULCT BONY oso wiac om Salem eee = eae Soe ee ae Pontiometra andersoni.
Amphimetra molleri.
pAntedon milberty. 2c eto ee ctte alent San dese sacle se 3 [mph milberti.
Amphimetra discoidea.
PAMECAOMSCLIADITULnememem eee eo sere eerie eee ee sete Oligometra serripinna.
PAriLedOn GAMONACH, BPs) MOV gars clases wana mia nies 2 =| t= =f /eim ae ay Oligometra japonica.
: Colobometra vepretum.
Antadon perspinnen cu 4222-10: Ub satd0-b4 2..gaese 2a «262 Colokontid eeaees
PATtEdONI OTA VSD a NOVmes ent eee en a aeiaaae ne eee eee ent Tropiometra afra.
Antedon hupfert, 8p. NOVse22-so2s2-0- 20 ta oe sass ceeseee Antedon hupferi.
Amtedon Nand (Sp ONp ssn eree ts seni 2s secs nes See ee eee Iridometra nana.
PA CEI OTIVEL TO CVU CTCL eee ene ee oo it eal Comantheria briareus.
FA CEULOMLELT Oy POTN CUT Oalctnrs states clatca ciao aaain' ws oie ae erere te eos Comanthus samoana.
| Comanthina schlegelit.
Comanthus parvicirra.
PA CLIMOMEN.O TEQUILA tet eee ae See oh) tae eee eee Comanthina schlegelit.
Actinometra coppingeri......------------------------------- Capillaster multiradiata.
Actinometra macrobrachius, sp. NOV ....--.--.------------- Capillaster macrobrachius.
Actinomelra fim Urniatare= seco cere ae ee ees Capillaster multiradiata.
‘Actinometra muliwadiatGecees == tee re nee ane Capillaster multiradiata.
PA CENTIO NICU O) SLELING ET (ne aaa ea ea Comatella stelligera.
BA CEYTVOTIVEUT CTU CTLL LU fo tere ao tate eee ol ee Comatella maculata.
CALL UTIOTIVEET CU PTEL LCI Be UL Cee ele ee aoa ete lel ene Comatella maculata.
PA CEETOMELT A SOLONLS meas ele ee ae ee eee ler Comatula solaris.
Actinometra pectinata....- - See eee eee eee eee Comatula pectinata.
PA CHINOMEMUUTACRIO LALO = aa a ayaa niete ieleee ee es ee es Comatulella brachiolata.
PA CINTIGTICEET OEY PUI a= meme ote eae ea altel tated rat Comaster typica.
Actimometra gracilis, Sp. NOY ---------------------2e+-e5e- Comaster gracilis.
In addition to the new species indicated above, Hartlaub described in the pre-
liminary paper Antedon lepida, A. protecta, and A. amboinensis, which he later re-
ferred to Antedon palmata, A. imparipinna, and A. brevicuneata, respectively; all
three of them are synonyms of Lamprometra protectus.
Dr. P. H. Carpenter in 1891 published a paper on a small collection of crinoids
from Madeira, in which he discussed the vexed question of the synonymy of the
common European species, combining as a single form all the species which are now
understood as constituting the genus Antedon; and Canon Norman wrote a short
note in which he called attention to the fact that Actinometra, as used by Carpenter
50 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
in the Challenger report, is clearly preoccupied by the Comaster of Agassiz. The
perversion by Miiller of this latter name is explained, and for Comaster, as used by
Miller (that is, with the type Comatula multiradiata Goldfuss, not Lamarck—Alecto
bennetti Miller), he suggested the term Goldfussia, which, however, was promptly
shown by Dr. F. A. Bather to be preoccupied and therefore unavailable.
The work of the two French steamers, the 7’ravailleur and the Talisman, had
resulted in the discovery of many interesting crinoids off the coast of southern
Europe and northwestern Africa. Scattered references to these are found in the
writings of E. Perrier, Captain Parfait, de Folin, and of the Marquis de F ilhol,
but they are mostly very indefinite and unsatisfactory. Interest in these crinoids
appears to have soon died out, and no detailed report upon them has as yet been
published.
In 1892 Professor Bell recorded some crinoids which had been dredged off the
west coast of Ireland, and described a new species from Mauritius, Antedon emen-
datriz (Cenometra emendatriz) which is difficult to understand owing to the inade-
quateness of the description and to the lack of correlation between the description
and the figures. In the same year he published a useful epitome of the knowledge
in regard to the British comatulids. The account of the comatulids which had
been collected by the Norwegian North Atlantic Expedition, by Prof. D. C. Dan-
ielssen, also appeared in this year, as well as a list of Norwegian species, by Miss
L. Buckley, from the dredgings of the steam yacht Argo.
In 1893 Professor Bell reported upon a small collection of crinoids from the
Sahul Bank, north of Australia, describing one new species, Antedon wood-masoni
(Cosmiometra woodmasoni).
In 1894 de Loriol again recorded Tropiometra carinata from Mauritius; Prof.
Georg Pfeffer recorded some species from east Spitzbergen; Mr. Edgar Thurston
recorded a number of forms from various localities in southeastern India, the
identifications having been furnished by Professor Bell, and Professor Bell published
an account of the crinoids of Macclesfield Bank, near the Philippines, adding to
it lists of the species known from northwestern Australia and from the Arafura
and Banda Seas. The crinoids he gives are:
MaAccLEsFIELD BANK.
Eudiocrinus granulatus, sp. nov.................-.------- Budiocrinus indivisus.
ANIACON: COMNOLG 1 oa wetcle eh oe ins cee see eee ee Oligometra serripinna.
ANFEU OT REDMON x see oe oni od 2 oly Sete ee eee Stephanometra tuberculata.
AMLEdOn: MOT MALT, AP: NOVoc sea cae... eee See ea ee Himerometra robustipinna.
Antedon bassett-smithi, sp, NOV........--..--2..22-22+---- Comatella stelligera.
Antedon vicaria, sp. nov........ So aentcta ete alate Ie eT RE Mariametra vicaria.
Antedon brevicirra, sp. nov......- Pain c tear Saree ...-Comaster distincta.
Antedon flavomaculata, sp. nOV.........2.0+-ec---eeeceess Stephanometra monacantha.
ANTEAOTE MOO HD eNO. << ons He inate ee cl oot es ee Lamprometra protectus.
PANLOGOT I ieLOt, BD. NOY 22), civ noose oes ete eee (?)
OLE LOCOS DUO «<5 oud cae Le ean ko ee ee Mariametra vicaria.
wcesnometrafimbriata: 2A the eee er S20 Capillaster multiradiata.
ACHMNOM CH POTTIONT GW 32250 SIE ee ONS 5. ce Comanthus parvicirra.
LACUMMON Et U DOTNEacinc sk Ee ee eee. Ls ee Comanthus bennetti.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 51
Actinometra simplex.--.-.--------+---+------- ttt tree Comatella maculata.
Actinometra duplex..---------------------2 2000 e ttre Comanthina schlegelii.
Actinometra maculata.....--------------+--+-+-200cr ctr Comatella stelligera.
Actinometra rotalaria...-------------------++---22tttt Comanthus parvicirra.
Actinometra regalis....---.----------+---+-2+7227 77700777 Comaster multibrachiata.
Actinometra peregrina, 8p. NOV-------------------- +77 777- Comissia peregrina.
Nortuwest AUSTRALIA.
er Amphi iscoidea.
Antedon milberti { caropliemiclra Cae
Oligometra carpenteri.
Antedon serripinna...---------+--------2222-02 rrr Oligometra carpenteri.
Antedon variipinna...--------------------+22-rtt rrr Amphimetra crenulata.
Antedon, sp. (‘‘near macronema”) ..-------++++-----277777> Cenometra cornuta.
: 2 Comat ti :
Actinometra pectinata......-----+-------+222207 rrr { Cmte peas
Comatula purpurea.
Actinometra nobilis.......------------------2-007 ttt Comaster belli.
Actinometra paucicirra...-.------------+-+2 20222 t rrr Comatula rotalaria.
Actinometra parvicirra {eee Ree:
eee ace eam Lee aT Sy a Comantheria briareus.
Actinometra variabilis......---------------++++20ctrttctte Comanthus parvicirra.
A : Comaster typica.
Actinometra multifida.....--------------++---002 terre { : ‘
jnometra mullyfi Comanthina belli.
Actinometra multiradiata...---.---------------++---7-7- .. Capillaster multiradiata.
ARAFURA AND BANDA SEAS.
Actinometra maculata...-------------+------+22 220 cr ttre Comatella maculata.
In 1895 Dr. Clemens Hartlaub published a paper on some comatulids from
the Bay of Panama, the first definitely known from the eastern Pacific, announcing
the important discovery of Florometra (Carpenter’s ““Eschrichti group” of Ante-
don) within the tropics, and extending the known range of one species of that
genus (Florometra magellanica) from the Straits of Magellan to Panama; at the
same time he described a new species of Florometra from Panama, and three spe-
cies of other genera from the Galapagos Islands; in an appendix he described a
new Lamprometra from Gaspard Strait, between Banka and Billeton. The species
mentioned by him are:
Antedon agassizii, sp. NOV---------+-+--+22222 22205 r rrr Thalassometra agassizit.
Antedon rhomboidea..-------------------- 77 t2 ttt Florometra magellanica.
Antedon tanneri, sp. DOV..----------------22-72 0 rrr Florometra tanneri.
Antedon parvula, sp. NOV.---------++----222552ttrt rts Thaumatometra parvula.
Antedon bigradata, Sp. DOV.-------+---------27 222555 t ttt Psathyrometra bigradata.
Vinedon Spi ie = eee 2a ae acer ae es ee eo ae Trichometra, sp.
Wraicdon BD meee sectese sence er = ccc reeecr cenaas Psathyrometra, sp.
Antedon subtilis, sp. DOV. ---------------+2---2000r tr Lamprometra subtilis.
In this paper Hartlaub suggests the following arrangement of the comatulids:
I. Series I. Species with plated ambulacra:
(a) The two outer radials articulated.
Menara eens ewes = hee sewer cen scare cia stan le CU Oes OUP:
Acela group.
tcaaayG Hietaralir lS Ueto eeeee rae so be don uc ome pag OCe EC Ses ““Spinifera group.”
Mhredilistichals:.-.-+.<-s-----s0-=-ene~ oma 2 2s 2 ooo Snes “Granulifera group.”
(6) The two outer radials united by 8yZygy--------------+---2°+2-7-7> “ Blegans group.”
52 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
II. Series II. Species with unplated ambulacra:
“ Eschrichti group.”
Went gums? sss. soe ee eee ee eo ae se encore a eee “ Milberti group.”
‘ Tenella group.”
Two Gistichals-seenes sae ee > oman ome nee ate winston“ eae ‘* Palmata group.”
Three distichale.tc<2 he - so -cs- > See ae eae - ~ ne cena elie nis' a eelasle = “Savignyt group.”
In this year also Hara described Antedon macrodiscus (Tropiometra macrodiscus)
from Japan, at the same time mentioning the fact that Comanthus japonica is
abundant at Misaki. Prof. E. von Marenzeller gave a detailed account of the
occurrence of comatulids in the eastern Mediterranean; and Prof. René Keehler
described a new form, Antedon flava (Crotalometra flava) from the dredgings of
the French steamer Caudan, and in addition recorded a number of species from
Amboina. In this last paper he records Comanthus bennetti under the name of
Actinometra robustipinna, being unaware that the type-specimen of the latter is
an endocyclic example, representing a species in the “‘Savignyi group” of Carpenter.
In 1898 Prof. Ludwig Déderlein published the results of his study of a small
collection of comatulids from Amboina and Thursday Island; the species noted
by him were the following:
ANLEMON ELEQUNS = coe neice ee new csioe oe eee seer ee Zygometra elegans.
VANTECOTS INNCTOCIECUS i= ate tie ne ao ctears ea wee sinew eine or Zygometra microdiscus.
BAMLENOTL OLGEIS hae oie eee aie eS ee ee eee Oligometrides adeonz.
PAN tedON LAOUsCi sme ene te one fo a eae neem laintatar Craspedometra acuticirra.
VANTECOTE AT DORN onns =e oer eee e eee Lamprometra protectus.
VA CHET ONIVEERG SPECTROM tam aan 3 wolfe eee ie eel Comatula pectinata,
ACHNOMEHCSOUMNE nec = oman a<,~ 32 252 eee see eee ee a Comatula solaris.
SACEETLOMIERNEL PROVCUON Tila ae naam ae ae tale ale a alsie = nieai i Comatula rotalaria.
itinitie ODER eo ee 55 oh Sten Ab he Neon rane.
Comaster belli.
, as Comanthus annulata,
DA CONTEOILOCINL PION URRY Teeter siete re oe ree | Comanthus parvicirra.
SACRO TEQAUS = 2 cone ce eosin esis he ~ see eee ee sce Comanthina schlegelit.
In the following year Prof. Hubert Ludwig discussed the crinoid fauna of Zan-
zibar, adding to the species already known from the region Antedon flagellata (Dich-
rometra flagellata, var. afra), and recapitulating the previous records of others. At
the same time he published a paper on the crinoids of the Magellanic region, taking
the opportunity to compare the arctic and the antarctic faunas. Professor Bell
in the same year recorded the echinoderms which had been obtained by Mr. J. Stan-
ley Gardiner at Rotuma and Funafuti; there was only one comatulid (Comatella
maculata) among them. He also published a list of the species which were obtained
by Dr. Arthur Willey during his expedition to the Pacific in search of the eggs
of the pearly nautilus. The species mentioned in this latter paper are:
EANIEPL OTE NOLO» oes fimo ee eee ee oR ee ee CEE Lamprometra protectus.
Antedon tuberculata.............--.----- So ahe Pb eee Stephanometra tuberculata.
PALA ONLEH MOT ONGICN i =) 2 <5 ose an es stay oe te eee Comanthus bennetti.
PAPEMLEN TONIC OM UIRS « oa 3 tata en, aaa, pee
Comaster gracilis.
PLCEMLONIORNE UCTHAREG oo oe Sa Se Bn Sc Comanthus bennetti.
PLCUEOTCN ONTRE ACU TO) << occ cise oes nics le eee Comanthus parvicirra,
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 53
Prof. Georg Pfeffer in 1900 published a list of the comatulids which had been
obtained at Ternate by Prof. W. Kiikenthal, and Prof. Percival de Loriol described
Antedon déderleini (Dichrometra déderleini) from Japan.
It was in 1900 also that Prof. Carl Chun brought out his interesting semi-
popular account of the cruise of the German steamer Valdivia, in which he figures
a new species of Eudiocrinus (Pentametrocrinus) which was dredged off the coast
of Somaliland, thus extending the known range of the genus in the Indian Ocean
from the eastern portion of the Bay of Bengal, whence a specimen had been recorded,
without a specific name, by Wood-Mason and Alcock in 1891.
The only paper of general interest in 1901 was Prof. Hubert Lyman Clark’s
memoir on the echinoderms which had been collected by the Bureau of Fisheries
steamer Fish Hawk about the shores of Porto Rico. In this paper he mentions
the following species:
PAMLEMON NAGEN TD x02 tae nla niai= clea ewe o= ena ores Sone ln ce ore Coccometra nigrolineata.
PA CLUTLONLELN, Cn TILEDULO TUL LLB S eratctalas ae etalaratte set atel et aie eenet = t=)n le ate) ators oe Comactinia echinoptera.
PA CHINOTEN A TU DIQUIL OSC tare atatata stata siaiele alosiai=ieisin cise esi se Comactinia echinoptera.
In the year 1904 Mr. Frank Springer described Actinometra iowensis (Nemaster
dowensis) which had been obtained in three feet of water on the Florida reefs; and
for the first time described covering plates, comparable to those seen in many of
the endocyclic forms, in a comasterid. In the same year Professor Bell published
a list of the comatulids which had been collected by Mr. J. Stanley Gardiner in the
Maldive and Laccadive archipelagoes, noting the following:
Amphimetra producta.
FANUEAON LE VSSUMN Dana cses cee s ace ceecaaeciece sane esac ese = Amphimetra molleri.
Decametra taprobanes.
Decametra mobiusi.
PANLECONNMLL DET Ela eee eee eies a sene eee see ete esses Amphimetra producta.
-| Amphimetra molleri.
PANLELON PUL ans sense ccm seiaceee ncn son eae sents ee seelele Himerometra sol.
LANLECONANAICHS sara) sans ee sa Sees Se sine eee ee Comaster gracilis.
VATHECOTO UAIUPINNA. Seen seers ae eee ae ee see Stee aera ?
PA CHUNONTEN Qily DUCH = Sekpay isms SUP foes =) oats eee te eke Comanthina schlegelit.
PACH NOMEN CifUIMNOTUALG sass o= we wile eels pale iia sea eer Capillaster multiradiata.
Actinometra multiradiata........-..--.-.-------- “ise ose ts Capillaster multiradiata.
JOA OCI ARONA MIO Win ccacesbagsasdeds ssesaeesddkooseoseacoke Capillaster sentosa.
PACEUTLOMVELT CL TIVACULOL Ga oe ean ine oan nee ieee ee eee Stephanometra indica.
In a paper on the echinoderms of East Greenland, published in 1904, Dr.
Theodor Mortensen calls attention to the presence of covering plates along the
ambulacra of Antedon eschrichtii (Heliometra glacialis), and suggests that ae
systematic characters may be found in the structure of the outer pinnules of the
comatulid arms, which have hitherto been quite neglected from a systematic stand-
point. In the same year Mr. Herbert Clifton Chadwick published a list of the
comatulids which had been collected by Prof. W. A. Herdman at Ceylon during
his investigations of the pearl oyster fisheries about that island. The species
recorded by Chadwick are:
DATULE CLOTS CNTY TIVE et erate aol a= a ole aati ai Oligometra serripinna.
VAG ITECE TE IUNCOET Leta te = aaa alae alo ete eae alas shelton fa teed Amphimetra milberti.
54 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
AN LAROTT COTANGUD = 0 las ete wos Ss toile ho Sine setae ale Tropiometra indica.
Aritedon marqvnatd..<2..-- a. 29-2 wane eee eee elm Stephanometra marginata.
SANIOUON SIUNCL: «<< tos cena Seals a aoe eee eine pial Stephanometra indica.
PATTEM OGL = woe nin «amen eee ae ee eee ee ei i= Cenometra herdmani.
Antedon okellt, Bp NOV) << = <0 62 = sie ne oe alee ernie Lamprometra protectus.
Am edON FEY NGUGI ace nee mee ioe Sern aie eee tama sie eer es Heterometra reynaudii.
ANEMONE GNCEDE: fon on mw snide o> - rin tla el Heterometra bengalensis.
AntedOn VOTUPUNNG= «monn oem cnn == = nwo oem onan Heterometra reynaudii.
SACEUNOMAING MOTAUE alana eee ole einle a= laatete ental Comatella stelligera.
Actinometra multwradiata:-.. =~ - ------ 20+ - 5-9-2 2-2 Capillaster multiradiata.
Comanthus annulata.
AchinOmie ia pane Nernst leas sm stale aie oe eae tea tates eet Comanthus parvicirra.
Comissia chadwickt.
In 1905 Professor Bell recorded four species of comatulids from South Africa,
three of which he described as new, all in ‘‘groups’’ widely different from those in
which they belong; the four species are:
Antedon capensts, SP. DOV <---..cc0- oe nono - nano - ans =e Tropiometra carinata.
PAM TOOONNECIOIEN BDO DOM ese ee sre a eee se Pachylometra sclateri.
SATILEQOTS INOAGTICU TAs) KPa OV mniatnlnie ain oa a = feminine Crotalometra magnicirra.
PA CIMLONELT Os DON TACIT seen oie iettel eiste ee epee eee nice Comanthus wahlbergii.
In 1905 also was published Wilhelm Minckert’s important and instructive
treatise on autotomy and arm regeneration, with especial reference to the syzygy;
in this he proposed a new ‘‘group,” the “Brevipinna group,” to receive species from
the “Basicurva,”’ “Spinifera,” and “Granulifera”’ groups of Carpenter in which the
IlBr series are either 2 or 4 (3+4) indiscriminately; but he evidently had a very
hazy idea of the specific interrelationships of the forms within the group, as his
group type comprises at least four distinct species. In another paper published at
the same time he very rightly splits Carpenter’s genus Promachocrinus into two
components (Promachocrinus and Decametrocrinus), but very illogically creates the
family Decametrocrinide for their reception, or as an equivalent to the old genus
Promachocrinus, his final arrangement being little, if any, in advance of that of
Carpenter; a new species of Promachocrinus as restricted (P. vanhéffenianus; a
synonym of P. kerguelensis) is described, and the suggestion is made that the
comatulids be recognized as a distinct order under the name of Eleutherocrinoidea
(having nothing to do with the pentremite genus Eleutherocrinus), the stalked
crinoids to be considered as representing another order, the Stylocrinoidea.
In 1907 Dr. Hubert Lyman Clark recorded two comatulids which had been
obtained by Mr. Alan Owston off southern Japan and given by him to Mr. Thomas
Barbour; these were: Tropiometra macrodiscus and Cyllometra manca (C. albo-
purpurea).
In 1908 Mr. Chadwick published an account of a collection of comatulids brought
together by Mr. Cyril Crossland during Professor Herdman’s biological survey of
the Sudanese Red Sea; in this paper six species are listed, as follows:
Antedon serri pinna ea as ee Ete ne et aha ed ef Prometra chadwicki .
PANMBQOTL ANTONIN. «Sosa cee gee is ee ee Tridometra xgyptica.
Antedon MOLINA ss oa ona cose sane elm inn eee ew an ce eelate ?Stephanometra marginata.
Antedon imparipinna........ pale a ae a lala eC ne Lamprometra palmata.
PATS ORLON, TRELLIS «rch sao Ove) See hte cine oe eS OE Lamprometra palmata.
LANOR OD EOVIONY tec tc nk Se ee, Anne, Heterometra savignii.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 55
Professor Bell in 1909 reported upon a collection of echinoderms made by the
Perey Sladen Trust expedition under the direction of Prof. J. Stanley Gardiner;
the species he records are:
PA CELLOMEL.G) LULU LOGO td eae nee mera rye tence sens select salts Comatella maculata.
PA itedOny COU Usama ataretss see elleetonlsaeieice sic oes cnc nees ?Cosmiometra gardineri.
AMCEAOT PAUL eos a eralatalatsizixt= nis (elsia}=ieinis,=\=|s\cisieleicie <s osiesine o Stephanometra indica.
PAM LEAO TY S DUCA ettate o ela stotere le iatnieine eile aeioc te eases aciaseree Cenometra emendatriz.
In 1909, also, Professor Kcehler summarized, in a magnificent monograph, the
results of the researches of the Princesse-Alice; in this eight comatulids are included,
as follows:
PAMLCAOTESCHTICN UA Stas ie steer a hy eee ee ee ae Heliometra glacialis.
A OBIRT OTR E Des een as oseleeiaoe asco Sccue cue ee aecs Thalassometra lusitanica.
PAN LEdON OMUSEC: BD NOV aaeane eee Sete tne Smee ise ee Thalassometra omissa.
Antedonphalanguunys aoa et see se ose ae eee ee Leptometra celiicn. ‘
Leptometra phalangium.
CANLCAONDTOULE me peee caciae cl eee eine aa ecn neces oer Hathrometra prolixa,
Amtedory MOSGCER: tasraras-faiarasta Seta Ae se etee lela o= seins crays Scie Antedon bifi da.
Antedon mediterranea.
Antedon tenella. -- 22-2 an = ee ene ae Hathrometra, sp.
PEO UOCKUNILS CLLR TULLCTES Seen te ae ae Pentametrocrinus atlanticus.
In 1910 Professor Kehler and M. C. Vaney published a preliminary note upon
the crinoids collected by the French steamers Travailleur and Talisman, and M.
Vaney described a new species of Promachocrinus (P. joubini) from the collections
of the Pourquoi Pas? under Dr. Jean Charcot.
Beginning in 1907 the present author published a number of papers on the Cri-
noidea, describing new forms, suggesting new interpretations for various morpho-
logical and anatomical structures, and developing an entirely new scheme of classi-
fication which it was believed would be more satisfactory than any of the schemes
previously employed. These papers are all preliminary and more or less incomplete
expositions of the matter presented in the present memoir, and it has, therefore,
not seemed necessary to review them in this connection; but an account of the
development by the author of each of the systematic units herein used, showing
the steps by which it has been brought into its present form, is included under each
of the systematic headings.
A study of these preliminary papers’ shows numerous misconceptions of sys-
tematic and morphological affinities and errors of other kinds, especially among
the earlier ones. These were chiefly the result of lack of material and necessary
dependence upon insufficiently detailed descriptions and figures. It is easy for the
man who does nothing to avoid making errors; but activity of any kind necessi-
tates occasional mistakes. No thorough revision or comprehensive work of any
kind was ever done without a similar history, and the author feels confident that
his errors will be found to be no more numerous nor more serious than those of his
predecessors
56 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
HISTORY OF THE INTENSIVE WORK UPON THE COMATULIDS.
The preceding sketch shows the gradual development of the systematic side
of the study of the comatulids from the first beginnings up to the present day;
but beside this constructive work a very considerable amount of intensive work
has been done. This intensive work, whereby our knowledge of single species, but
not of the group as a whole, has been advanced, has been mainly confined to mul-
tiplying records of locality within restricted areas.
As might be expected, Antedon bifida is the chief species concerned; but it is
rather strange that out of the very numerous records published of the capture of
this form, by far the greater part are in English journals. Antedon petasus has also
come in for a fair share of attention, but we are rather surprised at the lack of in-
terest which has been displayed in regard to A. mediterranea. Known from the
vicinity of Naples so long ago as 1592, it has been repeatedly recorded from that
district, although other locality records are very few; we do not understand it nearly
so well as we do Antedon bifida in spite of the fact that we have known it for more
more than 100 years longer. Antedon adriatica, although reported as abundant in
the Adriatic Sea, by Olivi, as far back as 1792, has been so neglected that it was
not even differentiated as a valid species until the past year.
The echinoderm fauna surrounding the coasts of Great Britain is now, thanks
to the early and enthusiastic interest shown by the British naturalists in dredging,
fairly well understood; and since the first discovery of Antedon petasus in 1835 and
of Hathrometra sarsii in 1844, but especially since the discovery of Rhizocrinus lofo-
tensis in 1864, the Norwegian naturalists, particularly M. Sars, Danielssen, Koren,
and J. A. Grieg, have greatly developed the echinoderm fauna of the rich Nor-
wegian coast, and we now have at hand a large mass of data concerning these species.
There has been only a slight and transient interest shown in the comatulids of
the corresponding portion of North America. Retzius described Hathrometra
tenella from “St. Croix” in 1783, and Say described H. dentata from New Jersey in
1825; since then a number of records of their capture in the early explorations by
the ships of the United States Fish Commission (in which, however, both are given
under the same name) have been published by Prof. Addison E. Verrill, but prac-
tically nothing by anybody else, or in recent years.
The western coast of North America remained absolutely a terra incognita so
far as its crinoids were concerned until 1907, in which year many species were
described from the region.
Chiefly within comparatively recent years a notable advance has been made
in the intensive study of the crinoids inhabiting the coasts of Australia. The
first local record, published in Tasmania in 1835 by Wilton, proves to have been
based on some organism not a crinoid. There is the same difficulty with the second
record, published by Sir Richard Owen in 1862. The third record is scarcely more
fortunate, for here a portion of a comatulid is described as a cystidean. Nine years
after this we find described and figured two comatulid pentacrinoid larve, but they
are given a place in the Porifera instead of in the Echinodermata. Except for these
records and notices of Australian species inserted in comprehensive works, Bell’s
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 57
list in the Alert report (1884) is the foundation upon which the knowledge of the
crinoid fauna of Australia must be built up. This was followed in the year suc-
ceeding by a list published at Sydney, and in 1888, 1889 and 1890 by lists and dis-
cussions of Australian species published both in England and in Australia, of which
the most important are the records of Mr. Thomas Whitelegge and of Prof. E. P.
Ramsay (Sydney) and of the Port Phillip biological survey (Melbourne). In 1894
the foundation was laid for the intensive study of the crinoids of the west coast of
Australia, while within recent years the work of the Hamburg west Australian
expedition and of the local surveying steamers Thetis and Endeavour has done
much to give us a clear idea of the Australian fauna.
The gradual development of knowledge in regard to arctic comatulids must be
considered quite apart from the development of the subject as a whole, for the
arctic regions have been made the scene of a vast amount of detailed investiga-
tion, far exceeding that bestowed upon any other area of equal importance, and
the abundance of reliable records from the seas north of America, Europe, and
Asia finds no counterpart in any other district.
About 40 workers have assisted in the elucidation of the arctic comatulids,
the majority taking little or no interest in those of other regions.
So long ago as 1770 comatulids were found in abundance in the Arctic Ocean
and we find many references to them in the writings of the old explorers, more es-
pecially those of Phipps, Scoresby and Dewhurst. Dr. W. E. Leach applied the name
glacialis to the largest, most characteristic, and most abundant of the Arctic species
some time before 1830, Professor Miiller, ignorant of Leach’s work, rechristening it
in 1841. In 1859 Edward Forbes remarked upon the enormous abundance of this
form at Spitzbergen in moderate depths, and since then there has been a continuous
accumulation of data regarding this and other arctic species, at first more or less
unsatisfactory but soon becoming definite and exact, so that now we know more
about the arctic species and the bathymetric, thermal, and cecological conditions
under which they live than we do about any one of the species of Antedon occurring
along the European coasts, or about any other crinoid.
A detailed history of all this Arctic research would be in effect a history of but
a single species, and is therefore reserved until the consideration of Heliometra
glacialis; but it would be an injustice not to mention the investigators by whom
this history has been mainly written. Beginning with Wright (1866), Wyville
Thomson (1872), Nordenskjold (1876), Sladen (1877) and Stuxberg (1878), who
were the first to present really satisfactory data, we meet with the writings of
Litken, d’Urban, von Marenzeller, Hoffman, Verrill, Fischer, P. H. Carpenter,
Ganong, Levinsen, Danielssen, Pfeffer, Drygalski, Schaudinn, the Prince of Monaco,
Déderlein, Hartlaub, Richard, Keehler, Kolthoff, Rankin, Michailovskij, Mortensen,
Schmidt, Grieg and Derjugin. Almost all of these gentlemen published at least
two papers on the subject, and some of them quite a number. Déderlein’s contribu-
tion to the ‘‘Fauna Arctica”’ is especially noteworthy in giving a valuable summary
of the records of all previous authors. ~
79146°—Bull. 82—15——5
58 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Professor von Marenzeller was the first to indicate that, so far as its crinoids
are concerned, the fauna of the western part of the Sea of Japan is in reality the
same as that of the Arctic Ocean north of Europe.
GENERAL SURVEY OF THE HISTORY.
The history of the development of the study of the comatulids is strangely
short when compared to the corresponding history of other groups of marine inverte-
brates. There has been a curious reluctance among investigators in regard to
attempting work upon these animals. But on the whole this is probably a fortunate
circumstance, for few organisms are so baffling and so difficult of systematic analysis,
and few have so well resisted the efforts of able zodlogists properly to understand
them.
The four works which may justly be considered as marking the four epochs in
the study of the comatulids are those of Linck (1733), Lamarck (1816), J. Miller
(1849), and P. H. Carpenter (1888), and about these four works the work of all
the other authors may be said to have centered, with a remarkably close corre-
spondence to the model. There has been an absence of originality and of attempts
at revision which is especially striking when we compare the history of the coma-
tulids with that of the stalked crinoids.
Although many serious errors have been made, and many wholly illogical
methods of systematic treatment proposed, it is perhaps remarkable that the mis-
takes have been so few. One can not help commenting upon the fact that the
study of the comatulids has been followed by so many of the greatest zodlogists
of the past two centuries, and how few are the names of men who have not attained
to the highest eminence along other lines.
At the present day the study of the comatulids is in its infancy; nothing more
than a beginning has been made, even in the systematic aspect, the phase of the
study of every group which commonly first appeals to the novice. One of the chief
aims of the present contribution is to demonstrate how woeful is our lack of definite
information in regard to even the commonest species, of their systematic interre-
lationships, their habitat, their habits, their life history, their anatomy, and of their
geological significance, not to mention their relations to temperature, depth, pressure,
light, salinity, and in general to all the physics and chemistry of their environment,
and to the other animals and the plants surrounded by which they live. It is
greatly to be hoped that the present memoir will call attention to these animals
in a way that will result in a great increase in the amount of work upon them,
and will serve as a stimulus and suggestive guide to young investigators looking
for an uncrowded and promising field in which to prosecute their labors, so that we
may, in the not far distant future, appreciate the general truths in regard to their
“natural history,’”” whereby we may, as we can through no other animals so well,
arrive at a clear understanding of many problems in marine biology and in geology.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 59
GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN THE DESCRIPTION OF A COMATULID.
Vale
Aboral.—The surface opposite to that which includes the mouth and the anal tube;
the dorsal surface. In life this is the lower surface under normal conditions
(see figs. 77, p. 130, 78, p. 131, 79, p. 132, 80, p. 133, 81, p. 134, 82, p. 135, 101,
p. 163, 107, p. 173, 114, p. 181, 160-162, p. 223, and 163, p. 225).
Adambulacral.—Bordering the ambulacral grooves.
Adapical.—Aboral or dorsal.
Adolescent autotomy.—See under Autotomy 2.
Adoral.—The surface upon which is situated the mouth and the anal tube; the
ventral surface. In life this surface is uppermost under normal conditions
(see fig. 117, p. 183, and p. 110 [7]).
Ambulacra.—(1) Shallow grooves running along the ventral (adoral) surface of the
pinnules and arms and traversing the disk, converging at the mouth; they
serve to convey food to the mouth (see figs. 15-19, p. 67, 22-27, p. 69, 45a, p. 79,
and 117, p. 183).
(2) This term as used by Guilding is equivalent to cirri.
Ambulacral grooves.—See Ambulacra (1).
Ambulacral lappets.—Small epidermal folds which border the ambulacral grooves
on either side, giving their margins a scalloped appearance.
Ambulacral plates.—Small plates developed in two rows (more rarely im a single row)
along either side of the ambulacral grooves; the Side and Covering plates taken
together (see figs. 7, p. 63, 18, 19, p. 67, and 55, p. 81).
Ambulacral structures.—(1) All the structures, both calcareous and noncalcareous,
internal and external, associated with the ambulacra.
(2) The structures in the radial, as opposed to the interradial, portion of
the animal.
Anal appendage.—See Anal process.
Anal area.—The interambulacral area at or near the center of which is situated
the anal tube (see figs. 15-19, p. 67, and pp. 110 [7], 111).
Anal funnel.—See Anal tube.
Anal interradial.—The interradial situated on the margin of the ana: area.
In cases where there is only one interradial present it is invariably the
anal interradial, and this is then known simply as Anal a.
In recent species if the anal interradial is present, all the other interradials
are also present (see figs. 115, 117, p. 183, and pp. 335-339).
Anal plate-—See(1) Radianal and (2) Anal x.
Anal process.—The name given to a short segmented process borne on the posterior
interradial (anal z) in the so-called Thawmatocrinus renovatus. Thaumato-
crinus renovatus is the young of the species later described as Promachocrinus
abyssorum, and the anal process is the rudiment of the first of the interradial
arms to be formed. Similar processes, each developing into an interradial arm,
subsequently appear on all the other interradial plates (see figs. 115-117, p. 183,
and pp. 335-339).
60 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Anal tube.-—A fleshy conical tube, usually of considerable height, situated in one of
the interradial areas of the disk (the anal area) and bearing at its summit the
anal opening (see figs. 15-19, p. 67, and pp. 110 [7], 111).
Anal x.—The interradial situated between the two posterior radials, distal to and
to the left of the radianal if that plate is present. In all the recent forms anal «
ORAL PINNULES
Br (PRIMIBRACHS)
CENTRO-DORSAL
CIRRUS SOCKETS
CIRRI
FiG. 1.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF ANTEDON ADRIATICA FROM TRIESTE; FOR THE SAKE OF SIMPLICITY THE FOUR ARMS
ON THE SIDE OPPOSITE THAT FIGURED ARE OMITTED.
is exactly like the other four interradials, and these are always present if anal z
is present. In the recent crinoids anal z, if persistent, gives rise to a post-
radial series exactly resembling those on the radials, becoming itself transformed
into a plate indistinguisable from a true radial. This is the cause of the forma-
tion of 6-rayed variants, the sixth ray being situated between the two posterior
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS.
ID,
SA
SWS
Y WS
Nees ate:
tT NE
i
BRACHIALS
BASALS (B)
Fia.2.—LATERAL VIEW OF THE TYPE SPECIMEN OF PHRYNOCRINUS NUDUS FROM “ALBATROSS”? STATION 4971; A
PORTION OF THE COLUMN AND MOST OF THE ARMS ARE OMITTED. THE CALYX, CONSISTING OF THE BASALS
AND THE RADIALS, IS HEAVILY OUTLINED (DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR).
.DORSO-CENTRAL (TERMINAL STEM PLATE)
61
62 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
rays and receiving its ambulacra from the ray to its left. In the genera
Promachocrinus and Thaumatocrinus anal x and all the other interradials give
rise to additional (interradial) post-radial series so that a normally 10-rayed
animal results (see figs. 113, 114, p. 181, 115-117, p. 183, and 122, p. 191).
Anambulacral.—Bordering the ambulacral grooves.
Angles of the calyx.—A term sometimes enployed to designate the points of union
between the interradial sutures and the suture between the centrodorsal and
CROWN,
+1 Brs/(PRIMIBRACHIAL AXILLARY)
4.
1 Bf, (FIRST PRIMIBRACH)
IALS
s
Fic. 3.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF ILYCRINUS COMPLANATUS FROM “ALBATROSS”? STATION 3783; THE MAJOR PART OF
THE COLUMN AND FOUR OF THE ARMS ARE OMITTED. THE CALYX, CONSISTING OF THE BASALS AND THE RADIALS, IS HEAVILY
OUTLINED (DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR).
the radial circlet in the comatulids. It is here that the outer ends of the basal
rays appear (see fig. 415, p. 319).
Antepenultimate segment.—Of the cirri; the segment immediately preceding the
penultimate (see figs. 314-317, p. 273, and pp. 278-283).
Anterior arm.—The arm situated directly opposite the anal area; in the endocyclic
species the ambulacrum leading from this arm across the disk would, if con-
tinued beyond the mouth, pass through the anal tube; in the exocyclic species
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 63
CIRRALS
X RADICULAR CIRRI
TERMINAL CLAW
BASAL SEGMENTS Fic. 5.
COVERING PLATES PERLSOMIC PLATES
SIDE PLATES
PINNULARS
.
PINNULARS
FIG. 7.
Fia. 8.
Fies. 4-8.—4, LATERAL VIEW OF A DORSAL CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF PARAMETRA ORION FROM SOUTHERN Taran. 5, LATERAL
VIEW OF THE ROOT OF A SPECIMEN OF BATHYCRINUS PACIFICUS FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN, SHOWING STUMPS OF RADICULAR
CIRRI(DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR). 6, ‘THE OUTER SIDE OF THE PROXIMAL PORTION OF A FREE UNDIVIDED ARM FROM A SPECI-
MEN OF STEPHANOMETRA MONACANTHA FROM Ful. 7, PORTION OF A DISTAL PINNULE FROM A SPECIMEN OF PCCILOMETRA
ACCELA FROM NEAR THE MEANGIS ISLANDS (ADAPTED FROM P. H. CARPENTER). 8, GENITAL (OR MIDDLE) PINNULES FROM
A SPECIMEN OF PCECILOMETRA ACOELA FROM NEAR THE MEANGIS ISLANDS, SHOWING THE EXPANSION AND THE VENTRAL
PLATING (ADAPTED FROM P. H. CARPENTER).
64 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
this ambulacrum usually, at the base of the arm, makes a more or less abrupt
turn to the right to reach the interradial mouth, which is situated between
the bases of the anterior and the right anterior arms (see figs. 22-27, p. 69,
and 117, p. 183, and p. 110 [6]); (see Avis and Orientation).
Anterior radii.—(1) The radius in which the anterior arm is situated is commonly
distinguished as the anterior radius (see fig. 22, p. 69).
(2) It is sometimes convenient to differentiate the radii on either side of
the anal area from the three others, in which case there are distinguished 2
posterior and 3 anterior radii.
(3) In certain of the Comasteride, where the left posterior radius is
curiously modified, this is often referred to as the posterior radius, the remaining
four being collectively termed anterior radii (see fig. 27, p. 69, and p. 111).
Apical.—(1) Aboral or dorsal.
(2) Applied to the centrodorsal (or cirri), situated at or near the dorsal
pole (see fig. 310, p. 269, and pp. 304-306).
Apical plate.—The hypothetical plate covering the center of the dorsal side of the
primitive crinoid (compare fig. 71, p. 127, and see pp. 198-200).
Appendicular skeleton.—The skeleton of the division series and arms; the skeleton of
the post-radial series.
Arm bases.—The proximal brachials; this term is commonly employed to distin-
guish the more or less oblong earlier brachials as distinct from the triangular
brachials beyond them (see figs. 30, p. 71, 6la-c, p. 87, 79, p.132, 94, p. 155,
109, p. 175, and 110 p. 176).
Arm pair.—Any two free undivided arms which arise from the same axillary. This
term is rarely met with except in reference to 10-armed species, in which each
of the post-radial series is sometimes referred to as an arm pair-
Arms.—(1) Strictly speaking, the series of ossicles subsequent to the last straight
muscular articulation; or the series of ossicles beginning with the one imme-
diately preceding the last synarthry; thus in the Pentametrocrinide the arms
begin with the first ossicle beyond the radials; in the Uintacrinide they begin
with the third ossicle beyond the [Br (costal) axillary; in the remaining coma-
tulid families they ordinarily begin with the first segment after the last axillary,
except in the genus Eudiocrinus, in which the third segment beyond the radials
is the first arm ossicle. In the recent comatulids the true arms never divide
(see figs. 6la—c, p. 87, and pp. 109 [5], 110 [6]).
(2) While the preceding definition delimits morphologically homologous
arms, it is more convenient for practical descriptive purposes to consider the
arms as including the entire undivided series of ossicles beyond the last axillary,
or beyond the radials in the Pentametrocrinide and in the genus Eudiocrinus
(see figs. 1, p. 60, and 2, p. 61, and p. 110 [6]).
(3) Several authors have considered all the ossicles beyond the radials,
no matter how many divisions there may be, and without regard for the type
of division, as morphologically comparable arms; this view is inadmissible, for
the reason that the radial is an integral part of the series of ossicles following,
and is not properly a calyx plate at all.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 65
CENTRAL CANAL
MUSCULAR FOSS
INTERARTICULAR LIGAMENT FOSSAZ
=
a BASAL RAYS TRANSVERSE RIDGE
|=) RADIAL RIDGES 2y DORSAL LIGAMENT FOSSA
ie - CIRRUS SOCKETS VW CRA centro-porsat
=
< INTERRADIAL RIDGES CIRRUS SOCKETS
Ss Fia. 10. ¢
DORSAL POLE
Fia. 9.
¢
%
A
“%,
Ue
oa) UN
Wo ip
ENTRAL CAVITY % Se
% ci SYZYGIES
S
%, NO
T Br, (FIRST PRIMIBRACH <7) , pees es
Fig. 13. ri ( aT es Ss WATER PORES
BASALS
CENTRO-DORSAL
Fia. 14.
Figs. 9-14.—9, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL AND RADIALS OF A SPECIMEN OF STENOMETRA QUINQUE COSTATA FROM
THE Ky ISLANDS (ADAPTED FROM P. H. CARPENTER). 10, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL AND RADIALS OF A SPECI
MEN OF HIMEROMETRA MARTENSI FROM SINGAPORE (DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR). 11, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTA-
GON OF A SPECIMEN OF HIMEROMETRA MARTENSI FROM SINGAPORE (DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR). 12, DORSAL VIEW OF THE
RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF PTILOMETRA MULLERI FROM SYDNEY, NEW SouTH WALES (DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR).
13, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PEROMETRA DIOMEDEX FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN (DRAWING BY
THE AUTHOR). 14, DIAGRAMMATIC LATERAL VIEW OF THE PROXIMAL PORTION OF A SPECIMEN OF ATELECRINUS CONIFER FROM
THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS (DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR).
66 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Articular faces.—The apposed surfaces of two segments united by articulation, as
opposed to suture (see figs. 31-34, p. 71, and 36-40, p. 75, and pp. 113, 376);
(see Articulations).
Articular facets—See Articular faces.
Articulations—The unions between adjacent ossicles when composed of ligament
bundles or of muscles, or of a combination of both (see Suture); articulations
are of two types, each type being subdivided into two subtypes, as follows:
A. Muscular articulations —The apposed articular faces are marked
by an approximately hemispherical pit lodging the dorsal ligament,
anterior (ventral) to which is a strong transverse ridge; slightly anterior
to the center of this ridge is the central canal through which passes the
axial cord of the dorsal nervous system; just anterior to the transverse
ridge lies a pair of interarticular ligament fosse, one on either side of the
central canal; these interarticular ligament fossee are bounded anteriorly
by strong oblique ridges which separate them from the pair of muscular
fossx (see figs. 31, 32, p. 71, 431, 432, p. 349 and pp. 114, 376).
a. Straight muscular articulation (often known simply as Muscular
articulation).—A type of muscular articulation in which the transverse
ridge is perpendicular to the dorsoventral axis of the joint face, and
the dorsoventral axis divides the joint face into two equivalent and
similar halves (see figs. 31, p. 71, 431, 432, p. 349, and pp. 114, 376).
b. Oblique muscular articulation.—A type of muscular articulation
in which the transverse ridge is strongly oblique in reference to the
dorsoventral axis of the joint face (typically making with it an angle
of 45°) and the interarticular and muscular fosse of the two sides
are more or less unequal (see figs. 6, p. 63, and 30, 32, p.71).
B. Nonmuscular articulations—Articulations in which muscles are
absent, the union being effected solely by ligaments (see figs. 33, 34, p. 71,
36-40, p. 75, and p. 113).
a. Synarthry.—A type of non-muscular articulation in which the
apposed articular faces show two hemispherical fosse for the recep-
tion of a pair of ligament bundles, separated by a strong ridge running
in the direction of the dorsoventral axis of the joint face, which is
pierced in the center by the central canal (see figs. 6, p. 63, 14, p. 65,
30, 33, p. 71).
b. Syzygy—A type of nonmuscular articulation in which the
apposed surfaces are flat, and are marked by fine low radiating ridges
(see figs. 2, p. 61, 6, p. 63, 14, p. 65, 34, p. 71, and 35, p. 73).
(See also Cryptosynarthry and Pseudosyzyqy.)
Asteriz.—Same as Pentacrini.
Autotomy.—(1) A process by which a comatulid inflicts self-mutilation, usually by
breaking off a part or all of an arm; this usually occurs at either a syzygy or
at asynarthry. This process of autotomy in the crinoids has commonly been
supposed to be voluntary, but is in reality the result of a state of panic which
causes a total relaxation of the muscles (see pp. 140-142).
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 67
AMBULA GROOV
INTERAMBULACRAL (INTERPALMAR) ees 7 a
uu ®
; SACCULL 8
3
x
°
=
é ANUS
2 ANAL TUBE MOUTH
J
~
a
=
-<
(YVWIVduaLNI) TVaOVINaWVYaLNI
Fia. 16.
AMBULACRAL GROOVES
(\ (iereRAMBULACRAL (INTERPALMAR)
AREAS
INTERAMBULACRAL (INTERPALMAR)
AREAS
PERISOMIC PLATES
SE oe Si
ANS NOY LES
PAS x
Q Sah \ Y X oO \Y
Fe
y=
AMBULACRAL GROOVES
MOUTH
ANAL TUBE’ anus ‘ANAL AREA ©
Fia. 18. ANAL AREA ANAL AREA
Fie. 19.
Figs. 15-19.—15, THE NAKED ENTIRE DISK OF A SPECIMEN OF TROPIOMETRA PICTA FROM RIO DE JANEIRO. 16, THE NAKED
INCISED DISK OF A SPECIMEN OF CENOMETRA BELLA FROM THE CHINA SEA. 17, THE DEEPLY INCISED DISK OF A SPECIMEN
OF MARIAMETRA DELICATISSIMA FROM SOUTHWESTERN JAPAN. 18, THE PARTIALLY PLATED, SLIGHTLY INCISED DISK OF A
SPECIMEN OF PARAMETRA ORION FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN. 19, THE COMPLETELY PLATED ENTIRE DISK OF A SPECIMEN OF
NEOMETRA MULTICOLOR FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN.
68 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
(2) In the comatulids this process is always invoked to produce a greater
number of arms than 10; the young animal always has 10 arms until a con-
siderable size is reached, when the arms are broken off either at the first syzygy
or at the first synarthry, and from the stump an axillary is regenerated bearing
two or more arms in the places of the one lost; this is known as Adolescent
autotomy.
Autotomy at any other place than the first syzygy or the first synarthry
always results in the regeneration of a single arm similar to the one lost, though
with a longer and more irregular intersyzygial interval (see Regeneration).
Adolescent autotomy is caused by natural growth changes in the arms,
and is not in any way subject to the will of the animal (see pp. 140-142).
Axial cavity—The small hole left in the dorsal pole of the centrodorsal after the
loss of the larval stem. It is almost immediately closed by a deposition of
calcareous matter (see fig. 594, pl. 16, and pp. 228, 229).
Azial cord—(1) The large nerve cord which runs along the arm in the canal (the
central canal) just anterior to the transverse ridge seen on the joint faces (see
figs. 31-34, p. 71, 63, 64, p. 89, and 65, p. 91 and pp. 350-354).
(2) This term is sometimes used to include all the nerves belonging to
the dorsal nervous system.
Arial interradial canals —The more or less complete canals in the interior of the
radial pentagon which lie on the sutures between the radials.
They inclose branches from the water vascular system (see pp. 375, 376).
Axial interradial furrow.—The furrows seen on the inner side of the radial pentagon
which coincide in position with the sutures between the radials; when bridged
over by calcareous deposit they form the axial interradial canals (see pp. 375,376).
Arial nerve cord. See Axial cord.
Axial prolongation—A prolongation of the radial canals of the water vascular
system whereby they come to end upon the ventral surface of the centrodorsal,
or even to extend outward between the centrodorsal and the radial pentagon
(see figs. 252-255, p. 253, 256-261, p. 255, 468-470, p. 359, 471-476, p. 361,
477, p. 363, and 508, p. 371, and pp. 374, 375).
Arial radial canals —The radial canals of the water vascular system, when more
or less surrounded by calcareous deposit.
Avial radial furrows.—The furrows on the interior surface of the radial pentagon
which when bridged by calcareous deposit form the axial radial canals.
Arial skeleton —The Radial skeleton.
Arillary—An ossicle at which the arms divide; a single ossicle which bears distally
two similar series of ossicles arising from a pair of similar muscular articulations
(see figs. 1, p. 60, 3, p. 62, 14, p. 65, 30, p. 71, and 61 a-c, p. 87, and pp. 358-
360).
Arvis.—The axes commonly considered in the description of the comatulids are:
(1) Anteroposterior axis ——This axis divides the animal into two
bilaterally similar halves; it is found in two positions, a (1) primary and
a (2) secondary.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 69
Fia. 20. Ria 22.
Fia. 26. Fie. 27. Fie. 28.
‘
Figs. 20-28.—20, THE DIGESTIVE TUBE AND DISK AMBULACRA OF ANTEDON BIFIDA, ILLUSTRATING A COMATULID WITH AN ENDO-
CYCLIC MOUTH (ADAPTED FROM P. H,. CARPENTER). 21, THE DIGESTIVE TUBE AND DISK AMBULACRA OF ONE OF THE SPECIES
OF THE FAMILY COMASTERID#, ILLUSTRATING A COMATULID WITH AN EXOCYCLIC MOUTH (ADAPTED FROM P. H. CARPENTER).
22, DIAGRAM SHOWING THE COMPARATIVE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE AMBULACRA, ANAL TUBE, AND ARMS IN A FIVE-
ARMED ENDOCYCLIC COMATULID; THE AXIS d-@ IS THE PRIMARY ANTEROPOSTERIOR AXIS. 23, DIAGRAM SHOWING THE COM-
PARATIVE RELATIQNSHIPS BETWEEN THE AMBULACRA, ANAL TUBE, AND ARMS IN A TEN-ARMED ENDOCYCLIC COMATULID; THE
AXIS a-@ IS THE PRIMARY ANTEROPOSTERIOR AXIS, 24, DIAGRAM SHOWING THE COMPARATIVE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE
AMBULACRA, ANAL TUBE, AND ARMS IN A TWENTY-ARMED ENDOCYCLIC COMATULID; THE AXIS @-a IS THE PRIMARY ANTERO-
POSTERIOR AXIS. 25, DIAGRAM SHOWING THE COMPARATIVE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE AMBULACRA, ANAL TUBE, AND
ARMS IN A TEN-ARMED EXOCYCLIC COMATULID, OR COMASTERID, IN WHICH ALL OF THE ARMS ARE PROVIDED WITH AMBULACRAL
GROOVES, AND IN WHICH THE MOUTH IS RADIALIN POSITION; THE AXIS a-@ IS THE PRIMARY ANTEROPOSTERIOR AXIS. 26, DIA-
GRAM SHOWING THE COMPARATIVE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE AMBULACRA, ANAL TUBE, AND ARMS IN A TEN-ARMED
EXOCYCLIC COMATULID, OR COMASTERID, IN WHICH ALL OF THE ARMS ARE PROVIDED WITH AMBULACRAL GROOVES, AND IN
WHICH THE MOUTH IS INTERRADIALIN POSITION; THE AXIS a-@ IS THE PRIMARY ANTEROPOSTERIOR, THE AXIS 0-b THE SEC-
ONDARY ANTEROPOSTERIOR. 27, DIAGRAM SHOWING THE COMPARATIVE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE AMBULACRA, ANAL
TUBE, AND ARMS IN A TEN-ARMED EXOCYCLIC COMATULID, OR COMASTERID, IN WHICH EIGHT OF THE ARMS ARE PROVIDED
WITH AMBULACRAL GROOVES AND TWO ARE UNGROOVED, AND IN WHICH THE MOUTH IS INTERRADIAL IN POSITION; THE AXIS
a-a IS THE PRIMARY ANTEROPOSTERIOR, THE AXIS b-b THE SECONDARY ANTEROPOSTERIOR. 28, DIAGRAM SHOWING THE
COMPARATIVE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE AMBULACRA, ANAL TUBE, AND ARMS IN A TEN-ARMED EXOCYCLIC COMATULID,
OR COMASTERID, IN WHICH FOUR OF THE ARMS ARE PROVIDED WITH AMBULACRAL GROOVES AND SIX ARE UNGROOVED; THE
AXIS a-2 IS THE PRIMARY ANTEROPOSTERIOR, THE AXIS b-b THE SECONDARY ANTEROPOSTERIOR.
70 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
a. Primary anteroposterior avis—In the endocyclie comatulids
the axis passing along the anterior arm and continued through the
mouth and anal tube, leaving the animal in the center of the posterior
border of the anal area, divides it into two exactly similar halves
(see figs. 22-28, p. 69).
b. Secondary anteroposterior axis—In such of the exocyclic
comatulids as have an interradial mouth, situated on the edge of the
disk between the bases of the anterior and right anterior rays the
anteroposterior axis which divides the animal into two bilaterally
equal halves passes through the middle of the interambulacral area
between the anterior and right anterior arms, through the mouth,
through the anal tube, and along the median line of the left posterior
ray (see figs. 26-28, p. 69, and pp. 152-161).
(2) Dorsoventral axis —This axis passes through the dorsal pole and
through the center of the disk, being at right angles to the plane in which
the arms lie when extended horizontally.
(3) Longitudinal axis—In speaking of the arms individually this
axis refers to the mid line of the arms; it is occasionally used in reference
to the pinnules or to the cirri.
Azygous tentacle—The median tentacle of a tentacle group; usually the term
refers to the first tentacle which is formed in the larva (see fig. 543, pl. 4.)
B.
Basal.—See Basals.
Basal bridge-—A narrow rounded ridge or rod connecting the inner ends of the
basal rays; the five basal bridges form a pentagon within which is seen the
rosette (see figs. 424-426, p. 321, 447-449, p. 353, 454, p. 355, 459-463, p. 357,
and 479, 480, p. 363, and pp. 324, 335).
Basal cirrals.—The one, two, three, or four very short cirrus segments immediately
adjacent to the centrodorsal (see fig. 4, p. 63, and p. 276). :
Basal fold.—The incurved edge of the basal grooves, which is applied to the basal
ray.
Basal grooves.—The grooves on the dorsal surface of the radial pentagon which
lodge the basal rays; they occur on the lines of suture between the radials (see
figs. 229-233, p.247, 236-242, p. 249, 243-249, p. 251, 256-258, p. 255, and
pp. 236-238, 370).
Basal pentagon.—The Radial pentagon.
Basal rays.—Prismatic calcareous rods of secondary origin developed in the basal
grooves between the radial pentagon and the centrodorsal; their inner ends
are usually connected with the rosette, and by basal bridges with the inner ends
of the adjacent basal rays (see figs. 9-12, p. 65, 97, p. 159, 208-215, p. 241,
227, p. 245, 229-233, p. 247, 416-427, p. 321, and 447-451, p. 353, and pp.
326-330).
Basal ring.—A structure formed by anchylosed basals which show no trace of the
interbasal sutures (see figs. 3, p. 62, and 134, p. 203).
Basal star.—The five basal rays, plus the five connecting basal bridges (see figs.
447-451, p. 353, and pp. 324, 325).
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 71
. BRACHIALS
“I1l Br (TERTIBRACHS)
1 Br; (FIRST PRIMIBRACH)
Il Br (SECUNDIBRACHS)
I Br (PRIMIBRACHS)
CENTRO-DORSAL
Fia. 29.
MUSCULAR FOSS
SEPTUM
INTERARTICULAR LIGAMENT FOSSA= LONGITUDINAL RIDGE
CENTRAL CANAL CENTRAL CANAL
TRANSVERSE RIDGE
LIGAMENT PIT Fia. 33.
DORSAL LIGAMENT FOSSA
Fia. 31.
MUSCULAR FOSS:
SEPTUM
{NTERARTICULAR LIGAMENT FOSS RADIAL RIDGES
CENTRAL CANAL
TRANSVERSE RIDGE CENTRAL CANAL
LIGAMENT PIT
DORSAL LIGAMENT FOSSA Fia. 34.
Fig. 32.
Fics. 29-34.—29, DIAGRAM OF THE CENTRAL STRUCTURES AND ARM BASES OF A SPECIMEN OF 4 SPECIES OF COMANTHUS WITH THE
CIRRI REMOVED (DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR). 30, THE CENTRAL STRUCTURES AND PART OF A POSTRADIAL SERIES OF A SPECI-
MEN OF THAUMATOMETRA TENUIS FROM THE WESTERN PART OF THE SEA OF JAPAN (DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR). 31, D1A-
GRAM OF A STRAIGHT MUSCULAR ARTICULATION (DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR). 32, DIAGRAM OF AN OBLIQUE MUSCULAR
ARTICULATION (DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR). 33, DIAGRAM OF A SYNARTHRY (DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR). 34, DIAGRAM OF
A SYZYGY (DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR).
72 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Basals (BB) —The plates which collectively form a circlet just below the radials; they
are usually five in number and alternate in position with the radials, but many
forms possess only three; they may be entirely distinct, with the suture lines
easily visible between them, or they may be solidly anchylosed, forming a solid
ring or funnel (see figs. 2, p. 61, 3, p. 62, 14, p. 65, 115-118, p. 183, 122, p. 191,
130-134, p. 203, 144, p. 207, 145, p. 209, and 407-413, p. 317, and pp. 316-331).
In the recent comatulids the basals, at first forming an essential part of
the calyx wall, become in early life metamorphosed into the rosette and there-
fore disappear from external view, except in the family Atelecrinide where
they are almost always to be seen forming a narrow ring between the centro-
dorsal and the radials (see figs. 123, p. 192, 124, 125, p. 193, 414, p. 319, and 430,"
p. 321, and pl. 8, figs. 573-575, and pp. 318-320).
Many recent comatulids have, just above the centrodorsal in the interradial
angles, more or less pronounced tubercules which are often so large as to appear
as true basals; these are, however, Basal rays of secondary origin, and have no
connection with the larval basals (see figs. 415, p. 319, and 416-427, p. 321, and
pp. 326-330).
In the recent crinoids the infrabasals, when present, form a circlet within
the basals and are entirely concealed by them; in the comatulids they fuse with
the uppermost columnal in early life to form the centrodorsal, or are entirely
absent (see figs. 565-572, pl. 7, and pp. 313-316).
The basals are the equivalent of the genitals in the echinoids. »
Basal surface.—Of the centrodorsal; the dorsal pole.
Base.—(1) Of the calyx; the Radial pentagon;
(2) Of the centrodorsal, the surface which is applied to the radials (see
figs. 229, 230, 232-234, p. 247, 235-242, p. 249, and p. 232).
Bifascial articulation—Same as Synarthry.
Bilateral symmetry.—See Symmetry and Azis.
Bivium.—A term used to designate the posterior pair of arms, or rays, when these
differ from the three anterior in being short, ungrooved, and nontentaculiferous,
as in many of the Comasteride (see figs. 45a—b, p. 79, and pp. 110, 111).
Bourgueticrinoid stem.—A stem or column of the type found in the species of the
genus Bourgueticrinus. This type of stem is characteristic of the young of
the comatulids and of the pentacrinites (see figs. 135-139, 141-143, p. 205,
518-524, 526, pl. 1, and 527, pl. 2, and pp. 208-210).
Brachial ambulacra.—The ambulacra on the ventral surface of the arms and of the
division series (in contrast to those of the disk and the pinnule ambulacra) (see
fig. 45a, p. 79, and pp. 110, 111).
Brachial axillary.—A term used by some authors for any of the axillaries except the
first, which is differentiated as the IBr, primibrachial, radial, or costal axillary.
Brachial perisome.—The perisome upon the ventral surface of the arms, beyond the
second brachial.
Brachials (Br).—The calcareous segments or ossicles of which the arms are composed ;
many authors have used this term for all the ossicles beyond the radials, but
it is more properly used, as herein, for the ossicles beyond the last division
series only (see fig. 1, p. 60, fig. 2, p. 61, and fig. 6, p. 63).
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 73
0.
Calyx.—The base of a crinoid; that is, the part remaining after the stem (or centro-
dorsal) and postradial structures have been removed; it includes the infra-
basals (when present), the basals and the radials, with any supplementary
plates such as interradials which may be found; by some authors the disk is
Fig. 35.—AN ARM OF A SPECIMEN OF STYLOMETRA SPINIFERA FROM CUBA SHOWING THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE SYZYGIES; AT
THE RIGHT ARE INDIVIDUAL SYZYGIAL PAIRS ENLARGED TO SHOW THE PROGRESSIVE DIFFERENTIATION OF THE HYPOZYGAL AND
EPIZYGAL.
included in the term calyx, though as a rule only when it is furnished with a
solid pavement of calcareous plates. (See figs. 2, p. 61, and 3, p. 62, and
pp. 174-182).
The calyx is not a morphological unit, for it includes the true coronal
plates, and, in addition, the radials, which are true arm plates.
79146°—Bull. 82—15——6
74 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Calyx plates.—The plates primarily enclosing the visceral mass; these include (1)
the infrabasals (when present), (2) the basals, (3) the radials, and (4) the
orals.
Carinate cirri.—Cirri in which median longitudinal keels are developed on the dorsal
side of each of the outer segments (see fig. 344, p. 287, and pp. 285-286).
Central anus.—An anus situated in the center of the disk (see figs. 21, 25-28,
p. 69, and pp. 110-111).
Central canal.—A continuous canal running through all the brachials and lodging
the axial cord, which latter is the radial extension of the so-called dorsal nervous
system. It passes through the brachials just ventral to the center of the
transverse ridges of the articular faces (see figs. 9-11, p. 65, 31-34, p. 71,
and 431, 432, p. 349, and p. 114).
Central cavity.—Of the centrodorsal, the interior cavity in which is lodged the
chambered organ and accessory structures (see figs. 13, p. 65, 229, 232-234,
p- 247, 235-242, p. 249, 243-249, p. 251, 250-255, p. 253, 256-261, p. 255, 262-
266, p. 257, 267-273, p. 259, 274-279, p. 260, 280-285, p. 261, 286-291, p. 262,
292-297, p. 263, 298, 299, 302, p. 264, and 592, 593, pl. 15, and pp. 232-234).
Central mouth.—A mouth is said to be central when it occupies the exact center
of the ventral surface of the disk, and all the disk ambulacra are of the same
length. In reality the mouth is never quite central (see figs. 20, 22-24, p. 69,
117, p. 183, and pp. 110-111).
Central plate-—See Centrale.
Central plug.—The more or less spongy calcareous deposit found on the ventral sur-
face of the radial pentagon; it may be so slightly developed as barely to con-
ceal the rosette, or it may fill the entire area between the outer borders of
the muscular foss of the articular faces of the radials. In general the central
plug is well developed in the oligophreate species, but absent or at most
slightly developed in the macrophreate species (see figs. 11, p. 65, 441, 442,
p- 351, and pp. 373-374).
Centrale.—The dorsal apical plate in the genera Marsupites and Uintacrinus. It
is the morphological equivalent of the centrodorsal of the comatulids, plus
the larval stem (see figs. 565, 572, pl. 7, and pp. 240-242).
Centrodorsal.—In the comatulids the plate occupying the center of the aboral (dorsal)
surface; it is usually large, discoidal, hemispherical or more or less conical,
and bears numerous cirri on its edges, though never in its center; in certain
of the Comasteride it may be reduced to a thin noncirriferous stellate plate
occupying the central space in the dorsal surface of the radial pentagon (see
figs. 1, p. 60, 10, 14, p. 65, 29-30, p.71, and 191-198, p. 237, and pp. 219-220).
Ontogenetically the centrodorsal is the topmost columnar of the larval stem,
plus the circlet of infrabasals in those species in which infrabasals are devel-
oped. It is the osteological equivalent of a single cirriferous nodal as seen in
the pentacrinites, though within it is compressed the equivalent of the entire
pentacrinite column.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. to
Chiasma.—The figure formed by the division of the dorsal nerve trunks within the
axillaries (fig. 62, p. 89).
Immediately upon entering the axillary the nerve cord divides into two parts
which run each to the center of one of the two distal articular faces. A trans-
verse connective unites these two branches just before they emerge from the
distal faces of the axillary. Shortly after the branching of the primary nerve
cord a small branch is given off from the inner side of each derivative; these
two branches run obliquely outward, distally crossing each other and immedi-
ately merging with the transverse connective.
Figs. 36-40.—36, A TYPICAL CRYPTOSYNARTHRY FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA PECTINATA FROM SINGAPORE. 37, THE PSEUDO-
SYZYGY BETWEEN THE OSSICLES OF THE IBR SERIES IN A SPECIMEN OF CoMASTER FRUTICOSUS FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS.
38, THE TWO ARTICULATING SURFACES OF THE PERFECTED PSEUDOSYZYGY BETWEEN THE FIRST TWO BRACHIALS IN THE TYPE
SPECIMEN OF COMATULA PURPUREA FROM AUSTRALIA. 39, THE PERFECTED PSEUDOSYZYGY BETWEEN THE OSSICLES OF THE
IBR SERIES IN A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA MICRASTER FROM THE ANDAMAN ISLANDS. 40, THE PERFECTED PSEUDOSYZYGY
BETWEEN THE OSSICLES OF THE OUTER DIVISION SERIES IN A SPECIMEN OF CoOMASTER FRUTICOSUS FROM THE PHILIPPINE
ISLANDS.
The chiasma within the axillaries is a reduplication of conditions accom-
panying the division of the primary nerve cords within the calyx (see figs. 62-64,
p- 89, and pp. 350-354).
Cirral.—A single cirrus segment (see figs. 1, p. 60, and 4, p. 63).
Cirrhal.—Same as Cirral.
Cirrhi—See Cirri.
Cirri.—In the comatulids and pentacrinites; jointed appendages arising in the
former from the centrodorsal, and in the latter from specialized columnals
(nodals) which occur at regular intervals throughout the stem (see figs. 1, p.
60, 4, p. 63, and 127, p. 197 and pp. 258-312); (see Radieular cirri).
76 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Cirriferous.—Bearing cirri.
Cirriferous nodals.—See Nodals.
Cirrus facets.—See Cirrus sockets.
Cirrus sockets —The depressions or sockets in the centrodorsal (or in the nodals)
upon which the cirri are situated, and by which they articulate with the centro-
dorsal (or with the nodal) (see figs. 1, p. 60, 9, 10, p. 65, 29, p. 71, and 148,
p. 220, and pp. 108, 109).
Closed ring.—Of calyx plates, a circlet in which all the plates are in apposition
laterally with the neighboring plates of the same series (see fig. 566, pl. 7).
Close suture.—See Suture.
Column.—(1) The linear series of ossicles arising from the center of the circlet of
basals; the stem; in the comatulids the column is discarded just distal to the
topmost ossicle in early life, and the animal becomes free (see figs. 126, p. 195,
127, p. 197, 128, p. 199, 129, p. 201, 144, p. 207, 145, p. 209, 532, 533, pl. 3, 543,
pl. 4, and 594, pl. 16, and pp. 108, 228).
(2) A series of cirrus sockets arranged in a straight line in the dirrection of
the dorsoventral axis (see figs. 190, p. 235, 192, 194, 196, 198, p. 237, 200, 203,
204, 205, 207, p. 239, 208-216, p. 241, 218, 223, p. 243, 227, 228, p. 245, 558,
pl. 5, and 573, 574, pl. 8, and pp. 198-219).
Columnals.—The individual ossicles of which the column is built up; these are often
referred to as ‘‘stem joints”’ (see figs. 2, p. 61, 3, p. 62, and 135-143, p. 205).
Columnar arrangement.—Of cirrus sockets; an arrangement of cirrus sockets in
lines parallel with the dorsoventral axis of the animal (see figs. 203, 204, 207, p.
239 and 208-216, p. 241, and pp. 108, 228).
Comb.—A peculiar comb-like modification of the distal part of the lower pinnules
found always in the Comasteride, but only rarely in the other families; the
outer ventrolateral edge of each segment is produced into a more or less elon-
gate spade-shaped or triangular process, which may be repeated on the inner
ventrolateral edge. In one of the comasterid genera (Comaster) the combs are
not confined to the proximal part of the arms as usual but occur at intervals
on the middle and distal pinnules (see figs. 56-58, p. 83, and 59-60, p. 85, and
pp- 112-113).
Combed pinnules.—The pinnules which are provided with a comb; in general this
term is synonymous with oral or proximal pinnules, but in several species the
combed pinnules are found far up the arms; combed pinnules occur in the Comas-
teride, and, less perfectly developed, in the antedonid genus Solanometra.
Commissural canals.—The canals within the substance of the radials which lodge
the circular commissure connecting the axial cord of each radial with those of
the radials on either side (see figs. 442, 444, 446, p. 351, 549, 551, 552, 557,
pl. 5, and 600, pl. 17, and pp. 350-354).
Commissure.—The circular nerve ring within the radials connecting the axial cords
all around the calyx (see fig. 63, p. 89, and pp. 350-354).
Compound basals.—The basal rays, together with the adjacent basal bridges and
the interradial portions of the rosette (see figs. 416-427, p. 321, and pp. 327, 328).
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 77
Compound interpolated arm division.—Arm division in which all the division series
are 2, these two ossicles representing externally a true division series, but
internally the first two ossicles of a free undivided arm, as in Comatella and
Neocomatella (see fig. 78, p. 131).
Figs. 41-44.—41, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL AND ARM BASES OF A SPECIMEN OF PONTIOMETRA INSPERATUS FROM THE
PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, ILLUSTRATING A SPECIES WITH WELL-SEPARATED RAYS AND DIVISION SERIES. 42, VENTRAL VIEW OF
THE CALYX AND ARM BASES OF A SPECIMEN OF PONTIOMETRA INSPERATUS FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, ILLUSTRATING A
SPECIES WITH WELL-SEPARATED RAYS AND DIVISION SERIES. 43, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL AND ARM BASES OF
A YOUNG SPECIMEN OF ASTEROMETRA MIRIFICA FROM THE Ki ISLANDS, ENTIRE (a), AND WITH ONE POSTRADIAL SERIES
REMOVED (6), ILLUSTRATING A SPECIES WITH CLOSELY APPRESSED OR “ WALL-SIDED’’ RAYS AND DIVISION SERIES. 44, VENTRAL
VIEW OF THE ARM BASES OF A YOUNG SPECIMEN OF ASTEROMETRA MIRIFICA FROM THE KI ISLANDS, ILLUSTRATING A SPECIES
WITH CLOSELY APPRESSED OR ‘ WALL-SIDED”’ ARM BASES.
Coronal plates.—The plates which primarily form a ring about the apical area;
these are 10 in number and in the crinoids are arranged in 2 circlets, the
first, abutting upon or concealed by the column, consisting of 5 small plates
(infrabasals) which are radial in position, the second, immediately beyond
the first, consisting of 5 larger plates (basals) which alternate with those of
the first and are therefore interradial in position.
-I
~
BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
The plates of the first circlet are usually reduced in number and may be
quite absent; those of the second circlet are often reduced in number, and may
be highly metamorphosed.
In the echinoids the coronal plates are always large and conspicuous,
forming a ring of 10 plates about the periproctal area, 5 small (the oculars,
corresponding to the infrabasals) and 5 large (the genitals, corresponding
to the basals).
Costal axillary (IBr,).—The first axillary following the radial; the primibrachial
axillary; by the older authors this was called the radial axillary (see figs. 1, p.
60, 3, p. 62, 29, 30, p. 71, and pp. 109, 110).
Costal pinnules (Pc).—The pinnules borne by the costals or primibrachs; among
the recent comatulids these occur only in the genus Eudiocrinus, where the
second costal or primibrach (IBr,) is not an axillary as usual, but bears a
pinnule instead of an additional arm (see figs. 83, p. 136, 84, p. 137 and pp. 114, 115).
Costals ([Br).—The postradial ossicles as far as the first axillary; the ossicles of the
first division series; the primibrachs; in all the recent crinoids except Meta-
crinus these are two in number, and, except in Fudiocrinus, terminate in an
axillary; they are not found in the Pentametrocrinide (sce figs. 1, p. 60, 3,
p- 62, and 29, 30, p. 71, and pp. 109, 110).
Though similar in appearance, the first division series is not homologous in
all types.
Covering plates.—Thin rounded calcareous plates developed along the borders of
the ambulacral grooves and capable of being closed down over them; in pre-
served specimens they are easily visible with a hand lens of low power as a
series of oval or approximately circular alternating imbricate plates concealing
the ambulacra; covering plates are almost invariably associated with side
plates (see figs. 7, p. 63, and 55, p. 81).
Among the comatulids covering plates are usually rudimentary or absent
except in the families Thalassometride, Charitometride and Calometride;
they are also large and well developed in certain of the Heliometrine, and in a
few of the Capillasterinz, in the latter occurring without side plates.
Crenellez.—Narrow rounded ridges, arranged more or less radially, most fre-
quently observed upon the joint faces of columnals and, in the comatulids,
upon the apposed faces of two brachials united by syzygy (see figs. 34, p. 71,
and 525, pl. 1, and pp. 208-210).
Crenulate sutures.—Sutures which are evident externally as a wavy line (see
figs. 127, p. 197, and 128, p. 199).
Crown.—The calyx and arms; a crinoid deprived of its column; this term is not
applicable to the comatulids.
Cryptosynarthry.—A synarthry which has become modified by a general flattening
of the joint faces, together with a restriction in the proportionate area occupied
by the ligament fossz, so that the latter appears very small; typically a crypto-
synarthry shows a very nearly plane articular surface upon which the position
of the central dorsoventral ridge may with difficulty be traced (see fig. 36, p. 75
and p. 113).
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 79
SG |
hes
f
LAELL LLL, /
Jf]
LAL
\
LL
LL,
; {ff f //
Midd
Uy
TAN
ff / 4
CA
“\
Fig. 45.—THE ANTERIOR (a) AND POSTERIOR (5) ARMS OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA PECTINATA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS;
THE LATTER ARE VERY SHORT, LACK THE AMBULACRAL GROOVES, AND TERMINATE IN A PAIR OF PINNULES INSTEAD OF IN A
GROWING TIP.
80 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
The cryptosynarthry is a synarthrial articulation which has lost all power
of motion and become immovably fixed, so that it appears externally exactly
like a syzygy, with which it has usually been confused. A parallel develop-
ment from the synarthry is the pseudosyzygy; both these types of articulation
sometimes occur in the same species.
Cystid stage-—The stage in the development of the young comatulid when the
calyx is composed only of basals and orals; the prebrachial stage (see figs.
407, 410, p. 317, 532, pl. 3, and 542, 544, 547, pl. 4).
Dy
Defective interpolated arm division.—Arm division in which the II[Br and further
division series are 3 (2+3) instead of the usual 4 (83+4), as in Capillaster and
Nemaster.
Deltoids.—See Orals.
Dermal plates.—Plates arising from a center of ossification within the dermal layers;
secondary plates; these plates are more or less circular, and are not fenestrated,
being built up of concentric calcareous deposits (see fig. 18, p. 67, and p. 195).
Dice-box shaped.—Hour glass shaped; differing from cylindrical in that the sides
are, from all points of view, concave instead of parallel (see figs. 141, 142, p. 205,
396, p. 309).
Disk.—(1) The integument covering the ventral surface of the body proper (that is,
considered without the arms), between the arm bases; it is traversed by the
ambulacral grooves which converge at the mouth, and in one of the areas delimit-
ed by these grooves it rises into the anal tube (see figs. 15-19, p. 67, 117, p. 183,
and p. 110).
(2) The visceral mass which rests on the calyx and arm bases (see fig. 89,
p- 147).
Disk ambulacra.—The ambulacra which traverse the disk, as contrasted with the
ambulacra on the arms and pinnules (see figs. 15-19, p. 67, 117, p. 183, and
p. 110).
Distal.—In the comatulids distance is reckoned in either direction (dorsal or ven-
tral) from the suture between the centrodorsal and the radials; of two points
on the arms, centrodorsal or column, the one which is further from this suture
is said to be the more Distal, while the one which is nearer to this suture is
said to be more Proximal. See Dorsal Surface, Upper Surface, Ventral Surface,
etc. (see fig. 1, p. 60).
Distal cirrals—The comparatively short outer cirrus segments which bear dorsal
processes; this term is used in contrast to Proximal cirrals.
Distal pinnules.—The pinnules beyond those which bear the genital glands (see fig.
1, p. 60, and pp. 112-113).
Distichal pinnule (P»).—The pinnule or pinnules borne by the IIBr series (secun-
dibrachs or distichals); these are never present unless the elements of the IIBr
series are four or more in number, except in Uintacrinus where the ITBr, (sec-
ond secundibrach or distichal) bears a pinnule instead of an additional arm
(see figs. 81, p. 134, and 82, p. 135, and p. 112).
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 81
Fia. 46.
= EES
Fie. 49.
Clete TeEK= M
MOAITE GS StS
: Fig. 52.
Fie. 51.
Fig. 53.
Fia. 54. Fie. 55.
Fias. 46-55.—46, AN ARM TIP FROM A SPECIMEN OF PTEROMETRA TRICHOPODA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, SHOWING THE
ABRUPT TERMINATION AND THE INCURVING OF THE TERMINAL BRACHIALS. 47, THE TIP OF A POSTERIOR ARM OF A SPECIMEN
OF COMATULA PECTINATA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, SHOWING THE TERMINAL AXILLARY AND THE TWO FINIAL PINNULES.
48, TIP OF A MIDDLE PINNULE OF A YOUNG SPECIMEN OF PTILOMETRA MACRONEMA FROM SOUTHWESTERN AUSTRALIA, VIEWED
LATERALLY WITH THE DORSAL SIDE DOWN, AND DORSALLY. 49, TIP OF A DISTAL PINNULE OF A SPECIMEN OF ASTERO-
METRA ACERBA FROM THE SAHUL BANK, VIEWED LATERALLY WITH THE DORSAL SIDE DOWN (@), AND DORSALLY (b); THE MID-
DORSAL CARINATION IS INDICATED BY DOTTED LINES. 50, TIP OF A PINNULE FROM THE MIDDLE OF THE ARM OF A LARGE SPECI-
MEN OF COMANTHUS TRICHOPTERA FROM NEW SouTH WALES, VIEWED LATERALLY WITH THE DORSAL SIDE DOWN. 51, TP
OF A DISTAL PINNULE OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATELLA STELLIGERA FROM THE INDIAN OCEAN, VIEWED DORSALLY (@), AND
LATERALLY (b). 52, TIP OF A DISTAL PINNULE OF A SPECIMEN OF CAPILLASTER MULTIRADIATA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS,
VIEWED LATERALLY WITH THE DORSAL SIDE DOWN (@), AND DORSALLY (b). 53, LATERAL VIEW OF A DISTAL PINNULE FROM A
SPECIMEN OF ASTEROMETRA ACERBA FROM THE SAHUL BANK, ILLUSTRATING A TRIANGULAR OR PRISMATIC PINNULE. 54, END
VIEW OF A SINGLE SEGMENT OF A DISTAL PINNULE FROM A SPECIMEN OF ASTEROMETRA ACERBA FROM THE SAHUL BANK,
ILLUSTRATING THE CROSS SECTION OF A TRIANGULAR OR PRISMATIC PINNULE. 55, LATERAL VIEW OF A PORTION OF A DISTAL
PINNULE FROM A SPECIMEN OF PACHYLOMETRA SELENE FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, SHOWING THE SIDE AND COVERING
PLATES.
82 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
Distichal radii.—A term sometimes employed to include a single I1Br series and all
the derivatives from it; it is therefore equivalent to one-half of a “ray,” the
latter term covering all the derivatives from a single radial (see fig. 29, p. 71).
Distichals (IIBr).—The secundibrachs; the post-costal segments as far as, and
including, the next following axillary (see fig. 29, p. 71).
In the comatulids the distichals are usually two in number, the two being
united by synarthry; this is expressed ‘‘II[Br 2;”’ more rarely these two are
united by syzygy, the expression in this case being ‘“IIBr 2(1+2);” but they
may be doubled, in which case the second pair are united by syzygy, the for-
mula being “‘IIBr 4(3+4).”
When distichals are present the most distal is always an axillary, except in
Uintacrinus.
Distichium.—Same as a Distichal radius.
Division series —(1) A term used to designate all the ossicles collectively between
the radials and the first segments of the free undivided arms (see fig. 29, p. 71).
(2) A term occasionally used to designate all the elements collectively
between the first or [Br (‘‘radial” or ‘‘costal”) axillary and the first segments
of the free undivided arms.
(3) A term sometimes employed to designate any one of the series of
ossicles which terminate in an axillary.
Dorsal.—Same as Aboral.
Dorsal cirrhi.—See Cirri.
Dorsal cirri.See Cirri.
Dorsal interradial furrows.—The shallow grooves or furrows on the dorsal surface
of the radial pentagon which lie over the sutures between the radials and accom-
modate the basal rays (see figs. 483, p. 365, and 512, p. 373, and pp. 370-372).
Dorsal ligament fossa.—The large semicircular fossa or depression occurring in a
muscular articulation dorsal to the transverse ridge (see figs. 9-11, p. 65, 31-82,
p- 71, and 431, 432, p. 349, and pp. 114, 376).
Dorsal nervous system.—The nervous system lying entirely within the primary
skeletal elements.
This nervous system corresponds to the subcesophageal ganglion and the
ventral nervous system of the annelids, crustaceans, insects, ete.
Dorsal pole-—The center of the dorsal surface of the centrodorsal; that part of the
centrodorsal which is bare of cirri.
It is usually smooth, and may be flat, concave, or convex (see figs. 9, p.
65, 146-150, p. 220, 151-159, p. 221, 171,173, p. 231, 183, 185, 187, 189, p.
235, 191, 193, 195, 197, p. 237, and 199, 201, 206, p. 239, and pp. 230-232).
Dorsal radial furrows.—The furrows on the dorsal surface of the radial pentagon
which traverse the center of the radials along their longitudinal axes (see figs.
434, 445b, p. 351).
Dorsal spines.—Spinelike projections from the dorsal (lower) surface of the cirrus
segments; they are not always present, and if present are usually found only
on the outer cirrus segments (see figs. 4, p. 63, 333, p. 283, and 347-348, p.
289, and pp. 276-284.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 83
Fia. 57.
Fias. 56-58.—56, THE TERMINAL COMB ON THE PROXIMAL PINNULES OF A SPECIMEN OF CoMISSIA DUMETUM FROM THE PHILIPPINE
ISLANDS VIEWED LATERALLY FROM THE OUTSIDE (a), VENTRALLY (b), AND LATERALLY FROM THE INSIDE (c). 57, THE TERMINAL
COMB ON THE PROXIMAL PINNULES OF A SPECIMEN OF LEPTONEMASTER VENUSTUS FROM THE WEST COAST OF FLORIDA VIEWED
LATERALLY FROM THE OUTSIDE (@), VENTRALLY (5), AND LATERALLY FROM THE INSIDE (c). 58, THE TERMINAL COMB ON THE
PROXIMAL PINNULES OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA PECTINATA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS VIEWED LATERALLY FROM THE
OUTSIDE (a), VENTRALLY (b), AND LATERALLY FROM THE INSIDE (c).
84+ BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Dorsal surface.—Of the radial pentagon, the surface which is covered by the cen-
trodorsal (see fig. 12, p. 65).
Dorsal tip.—Of centrodorsal; that portion of the centrodorsal, surrounding the bare
dorsal pole, which bears the so-called small mature cirri (see fig. 310, p. 269).
Dorsal transverse ridge-——A transverse ridge found on the outer cirrus segments;
this structure is only developed in a few species, where it takes the place of
dorsal spines (see figs. 349, 352, p. 291).
Dorsal tubercles.—Tubercular processes developed on the dorsal side of the outer
segments of the cirri; they may be described as short and blunt dorsal spines;
as with the latter there is ordinarily only one to each cirrus segment, though
sometimes two or even three are found side by side (see figs. 346, p. 289, and
370, p. 299).
Dorsocentral.—The terminal stem plate of the stalked comatulid larva; the primi-
tive dorsal central plate; this term is sometimes used instead of centrodorsal
(see figs. 2, p. 61, 532-540, pl. 3).
Dorsolateral processes—The produced dorsolateral borders of the ossicles of the
division series and of the first two brachials, as seen in Pacilometra.
Dorsoventral axis.—See Azis 2.
E.
Embryonic basals—Basals which appear as true basals only in the young, in the
adult becoming metamorphosed into a rosette.
Among the comatulids true basals are found only in the Atelecrinide,
but embryonic basals occur in the species of all the other families.
Endocyclic—With the mouth situated approximately in the center of the coil of the
digestive tube, and therefore approximately in the center of the disk (see figs.
20, 22-24, p. 69, and pp. 110, 111).
This includes all of the comatulids except those belonging to the family
Comasteridex and Uintacrinide.
Entire disk.—A disk in which the free borders of the interambulacral areas are
straight or slightly convex (see figs. 15-19, p. 67).
Entire regeneration.—See Regeneration B 1.
Entrochi.—aA series of trochite joined together as in life; a section of a stem or
column.
Epizygal—tThe distal segment of a syzygial pair.
Exocyclic —With the mouth situated on the border of or outside of the coil made by
the digestive tube, and therefore marginal or submarginal on the disk (see
figs. 21, 25-28, p. 69, and pp. 110, 111).
This includes most of the species included in the family Comasteride,
and the species of the Uintacrinide.
External arm.—The external arms are the two lying on the outer sides in reference
to the IBr series; more rarely the reference is to the IIBr series, but in this case
the fact that the second division series is the determining series is always
mentioned (see figs. 61), p. 87, and 78, p. 131).
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 85
Extraneous arm division.—Arm division resulting from the occasional branching
during growth of a linear series of brachials without the loss of the larval arm
and without the reduplication of the first two brachials, as contrasted with
Interpolated arm division, or arm division resulting from the interpolation of
division series, each of which is the exact morphological equivalent of the first
two (or four) brachials of the larval arm, between the first (or third) brachial
of the larval arm and the base of a new arm which is the exact duplicate of the
original larval arm.
Fiqs. 59-60.—59, THE TERMINAL COMB ON THE PROXIMAL PINNULES OF A SPECIMEN OF COMASTER MULTIBRACHIATA FROM THE
PHILIPPINE ISLANDS VIEWED LATERALLY FROM THE OUTSIDE (a), VENTRALLY (b), AND LATERALLY FROM THE INSIDE (c). 60,
THE TERMINAL COMB ON THE PROXIMAL PINNULES OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS TRICHOPTERA FROM SOUTHEASTERN
AUSTRALIA VIEWED LATERALLY FROM THE OUTSIDE (a), VENTRALLY (b), AND LATERALLY FROM THE INSIDE (Cc).
F.
Finial pinnules.—The paired pinnules terminating the posterior ungrooved arms
of certain of the Comasteride (see fig. 47, p. 81, and pp. 110).
First brachial (Br,).—Strictly applied, this term refers to the first ossicle beyond
the last straight muscular articulation. In most forms the first brachial is
the first segment succeeding the last axillary; in Eudiocrinus it is the third
postradial segment, and in Uintacrinus the third post-costal segment.
86 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
First inner pinnule (P,).—The first pinnule developed on the inner side of the free
undivided arm; it is usually borne by the fourth brachial (Br,), which is the
epizygal of the first syzygial pair (Br,,,); in several genera this pinnule is nor-
mally absent; it is always one of the last to be developed.
First pinnule (P,).—The first outer pinnule of the arm, borne by the second brachial
(Br,); in certain genera this pinnule is normally absent (see fig. 6, p. 63, and
pp. 107, 108).
Food grooves.—See Ambulacra.
Fosse.—The depressions lodging the muscles and ligaments in the articular faces of
muscular articulations.
Free brachials (Br).—The ossicles of the undivided arms, as contrasted with the
ossicles of the division series.
Free undivided arms.—The arms beyond the outermost axillary.
Fuleral ridge-—On the Transverse Ridge, the narrow vitreous ridge upon which the
actual contact takes place at the muscular articulations.
G.
Genital pinnules.—The pinnules bearing the gonads; the middle pinnules; these
follow the oral pinnules, and precede the distal pinnules (see figs. 1, p. 60,
6, 8, p. 63, and pp. 112-113).
Grooveless arms.—Arms in which ambulacral grooves are wanting; these are found
in certain of the Comasteridx; the left posterior ray is the one most commonly
found bearing grooveless arms; often the right posterior is also similarly modi-
fied, and the condition may extend to the posterior half of the lateral rays. In
species with very many arms all of those borne by the left posterior ray may
be grooveless, and there may also be several grooveless arms among those on
all the other rays. The anterior ray as a whole is never grooveless, though in
species with very numerous arms some of those on the anterior ray may be
grooveless; in such instances there are always fewer grooveless arms on the
anterior than on any of the other rays (see fig. 45), p. 79, and pp. 110-111).
Groove trunks —The ambulacra upon the disk before division (see figs. 15-19, p. 67,
and 22-24, p. 69).
(1) Primary groove trunks are the five ambulacral grooves which arise
from the mouth ring; after these divide they resolve themselves into ten
secondary groove trunks (see figs. 15-19, p. 67, and 22-24, p. 69).
(2) Secondary groove trunks —The groove trunks between the first and
second divisions (see figs. 17, p. 67, and 24, p. 69).
This term is sometimes used for all the groove trunks beyond the first
division collectively.
H.,
Habitus.—The general appearance.
Hard parts.—A comprehensive term used to include all the skeletal elements visible
externally.
Heterotypic arm division.—Arm division in which the IBr series is interpolated but
the following extraneous, as in Jsocrinus or Pentacrinites.
Hypozygal.—The proximal ossicle of a syzygial pair.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 87
ie
Incised disk.—A disk in which the interambulacral areas are greatly reduced in
size through the very strong concavity of their free outer borders (see figs. 16, 17,
p- 67, and 24, p. 69).
Inferior margin.—Of the centrodorsal; the margin of the centrodorsal adjacent to
the radials; the outer edge of the ventral surface.
Fic. 61.—DIAGRAM ILLUSTRATING THE HOMOLOGOUS ARMS IN TEN, TWENTY, AND THIRTY ARMED COMATULIDS; (a) THE POST-
RADIAL SERIES OF A TEN-ARMED COMATULID; (b) THE POST-RADIAL SERIES OF A TWENTY-ARMED COMATULID; THE OSSICLES
CORRESPONDING TO THOSE SHOWN IN THE PRECEDING FIGURE, NOW INTERNAL, ARE INDICATED BY A HEAVY OUTLINE;
(c) THE POST-RADIAL SERIES OF A THIRTY-ARMED COMATULID; THE OSSICLES CORRESPONDING TO THOSE IN FIGURE @ ARE
SHOWN BORDERED WITH» HEAVY LINES.
Infrabasals (IBB).—Small plates forming a circlet below or within the basals and
alternating in position with them; in the comatulids they are not always devel-
oped, and if present fuse with the centrodorsal in early life.
The infrabasals are the equivalent of the oculars in the echinoids (see
figs. 565-572, pl. 7, and pp. 313-316).
Infranodal.—The columnal immediately below a nodal.
Infraradials.—See Subradials.
Interambulacral.—Situated within the areas delimited by the ambulacral furrows
on the disk.
88 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Interambulacral areas (also called Interpalmar areas).—The subtriangular areas on
the disk between the ambulacral furrows (see figs. 1, p. 60, 2, p. 61, and 15-18,
p- 67, and pp. 110-111).
Interarticular ligament fosse.—The usually more or less triangular fosse seen on the
articular face of an ossicle joined to another ossicle by a muscular articulation
which lie just distal (ventral) to the transverse ridge, one on either side of the
central canal (see figs. 9, 10, p. 65, 31, 32, p. 71, and 431, 432, p. 349, and
p. 114.)
Interarticular pores.—In the pentacrinites, the pores between the columnals in the
upper (proximal) part of the column; these are interradial (interangular) in
position; they do not communicate with the central cavity of the column but
end blindly, usually at some distance from it, just as do the homologous sub-
radial clefts seen in certain comatulids (see fig. 127, p. 197, and p. 232).
Interbrachial.—Occurring on the perisome between the brachials; that is, between
the ossicles of the undivided arm.
Interbrachials (iBr).—Dermal plates occurring in the perisome between the brachials
(see figs. 104, p. 167, 115, 118, p. 183, and 122, p. 191, and pp. 339).
Intercostals.—Small dermal plates occurring in the perisome between the IBr series;
these are, among the comatulids, commonly, but incorrectly, referred to as
interradials (see fig. 104, p. 167).
Interdistichals—Small dermal plates occurring in the perisome between the Br
series.
Intermuscular furrow.—On the articular faces of two ossicles joined by a muscular
articulation, the furrow separating the muscular fosse; it lies along the dorso-
ventral axis (see figs. 10, p. 65, and 431, p. 349).
Intermuscular groove-—See Intermuscular furrow.
Intermuscular midradial furrow —See Intermuscular furrow.
Intermuscular notch—On the articular faces of two ossicles joined by a muscular
articulation, a notch separating the distal portions of the muscular fosse (see
figs. 31, 32, p. 71, and 431, p. 349).
Intermuscular ridge or septum.—On the articular faces of two ossicles joined by
a muscular articulation, a narrow ridge separating the muscular fosse in the line
of the dorsoventral axis; in many forms this is replaced by an intermuscular
furrow, or there may be aridge dorsally which transforms into a furrow ventrally
(distally) (see figs. 9, p. 65, 31, 32, p. 71, and 432, p. 349).
Internal arm.—Any arm arising from the ITBr (or subsequent) division series, except
the two outermost in reference to the [Br series, more rarely in reference to the
IIBr series (see figs. 61b, p. 87, and 78, p. 131).
Internal face of the radial.—(1) The entire surface of the radial within the distal
edge of the muscular fosse of the articular faces.
(2) The innermost portion of the preceding, which lies in a plane parallel
with the dorsoventral axis of the animal (see figs. 437, 438, 446, p. 351, 549),
551a, 554, pl. 5, and 600, pl. 177).
Internodal.—In the pentacrinites, a columnal which does not bear cirri (see fig. 127,
. 007:
p. 197.) ¢
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 89
Internodes.—In the pentacrinites, the sections of the stem between the nodals (see
fig. 127, p. 197).
Interpalmar.—Same as Interambulacral.
Interpalmar areas.—See Interambulacral areas.
Fias. 62-64.—62, DIAGRAM SHOWING THE ANALYSIS OF A CHIASMA AND THE COMPARATIVE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A CHIASMA
AND THE CENTRAL NERVOUS STRUCTURES (FIG. 64) (DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR). 63, DIAGRAM SHOWING THE COURSE OF THE
NERVES IN METACRINUS ROTUNDUS (DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR). 64, DIAGRAM OF ONE OF THE FIVE NERVE UNITS OF THE
CRINOIDAL DORSAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, SHOWING ITS INTERRELATIONSHIPS WITH THE ADJACENT SIMILAR NERVE UNITS (DRAWING
BY THE AUTHOR).
Interpinnulars.—Small perisomic plates sometimes developed between the bases of
adjacent proximal pinnules when these are incorporated in the body wall.
Interpolated arm division.—Arm division in which the division series are redupli-
cations of the first two or first four ossicles of the free undivided arm, as in
most of the recent comatulids (see figs. 6la—c, p. 87).
79146°—Bull. 82—15——7
90 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Interprimibrachial areas.—The areas in the lateral perisome of the visceral mass
between the elements of the primibrachial (IBr) series.
Interradial—Occupying a position between any two of the five radii, which are
determined by Jines drawn from the center of the animal along the center of
the radials and of the ossicles of the [Br series, and thence continued outward.
Interradial mouth.—In certain of the Comasteride the mouth moves from its original
position at the base of the anterior ray and comes to lie near the margin of the
disk midway between the bases of the anterior and the right anterior rays,
in an interradial position (see figs. 26-28, p. 69, and pp. 110-111).
Interradial radials—In the genus Promachocrinus (which has 10 radials instead of
the usual 5), the radials which lie in the primitive radii, as determined by
the orientation of the centrodorsal and of the basal rays, in contrast to the
radials which lie over the basal rays (see figs. 505, p. 371, and figs. 551a, b, pl.
5, and pp. 191-194).
Interradial ridges.—On the centrodorsal; the ridges sometimes developed in the
interradial portion of the lateral surface (see figs. 9, p. 65, 191, 192, 194, 196,
p. 237, 203, 204, p. 239, 215, 216, p. 241, 227, p. 245, and 558, pl. 5, and pp.
230-232).
Interradial spoutlike processes.—The interradial processes of the rosette (see figs.
577, 578, pl. 10, and 589, 590, pl. 14, and pp. 320-322).
Interradial structures—Structures developed in the interradial portions of the
ventral surface or sides of the disk or between the radials.
Interradials—(1) Plates developed between the radials, and therefore lying in the
radial circlet; among the comatulids they are found well developed only in the
young of the species of Thawmatocrinus and of Promachocrinus; in the young
of species belonging to other genera interradials, when present at all, are
resorbed soon after formation (see figs. 115-118, p. 183, and 122, p. 191).
(2) Dermal plates developed in the interradial perisome, but entirely with-
out the basal circlet; such plates are common in the species of the family
Comasteride, and are often found in species belonging to other families, as for
instance in Antedon bifida, A. diibenii and A. moroccana; these are more prop-
erly known as interprimibrachial plates (see figs. 104, p. 167, and 412, p. 317,
and pp. 335-339).
Interradius.—An interambulacral area.
Intersegmental pores.—Pores leading inward between the ossicles of the division
series and the arm bases, by which the disk is furnished with a supply of fresh
water when the division series and arm bases are in close lateral apposition
(see figs. 14, p. 65, 95, p. 157, 112, p. 179, and 123, p. 192).
Intersyzygial interval.—The interval between successive syzygies expressed in terms
of oblique muscular articulations; the number expressing the intersyzygial
interval is the number of oblique muscular articulations occurring between two
successive syzygies (see figs. 30, p. 71, and 35, p. 73).
Intertentacular area.—An Interambulacral area.
Intrapalmar.—See Interambulacral.
Intraradial commissure—See Commissure.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 91
ae
Joint face.—The articular surface of an ossicle.
L.
Lappets.—See Ambulacral lappets.
Large mature cirri.—In those species of comatulids which have cirri of very different
lengths, the longer cirri which are situated about the periphery of the centro-
dorsal (see figs. 310, 311, p. 269, and pp. 250-251, 294-295).
Larve.—tIn the comatulids this term is employed to denote the young up to the
time of attachment, after which they are designated as pentacrinoids.
Tea
lett
nD
rE)
vz
Fic. 65.—LATERAL VIEW OF THE PROXIMAL PORTION OF A SPECIMEN OF TROPIOMETRA MACRODISCUS FROM SOUTHERN
JAPAN, SHOWING THE DORSAL NERVOUS SYSTEM IN PLACE (DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR).
Larval stem.—(1) In the comatulids, the column of the stalked young (see figs. 407,
p. 317, and 532, 533, 540, pl. 3, and p. 198).
(2) In the pentacrinites, the primitive bourgueticrinoid column of very
young individuals (see fig. 143, p. 205, and pp. 224-226).
Lateral columns.—Of cirrus sockets; the two columns on the outermost borders of
each of the five radial areas of the centrodorsal (see figs. 198, p. 237, 200, p.
239, and 208-214, p. 241).
Lateral compression.—Of the cirri, division series or arms; compression between
planes including the dorsoventral axis of the animal.
92 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Lateral faces of the radials.—The faces by which each radial is in apposition with
the radials on either side (see figs. 549a, 5516, and 552, pl. 5).
Lateral processes.—In certain of the comatulids, ventrolateral or dorsolateral
processes developed along the division series and on the first or first two
brachials, one to each ossicle, of which the former assist in supporting the disk
(see fig. 87, p. 143).
Lateral surface.—Of the centrodorsal; the entire surface between the dorsal pole
and the ventral rim (see figs. 220-222, 224, p. 248, and pp. 229-232).
Law of Wachsmuth and Springer.—A law by the application of which the presence
or absence of infrabasals may be determined; it reads as follows:
‘1, In species with infrabasals, whenever the column is pentangular, its
longitudinal angles are directed interradially, the sides and columnar cirri
radially; on the contrary, in species with basals only, those angles are radial,
the sides of the column and the cirri interradial.
‘9. When there are infrabasals and the column is pentapartite, the five
sections of the column are interradial, the longitudinal sutures radial, the radi-
ation along the axial canal radial; but the opposite is the case when basals
ouly exist.”
Exceptions occur in regard to the outer angles and sides of the column,
and the orientation of the axial canal, due to modification by secondary
growth.
Left anterior arm.—The arm or ray next to the left of the anterior arm or ray, as
viewed ventrally, that is, with the disk uppermost; it lies between the anterior
and the left posterior arms or rays (see Avis and Orientation).
Left anterior interradial area.—See Axis and Orientation.
Left anterior post-radial series.—See definition under Left anterior arm.
Left anterior ray.—See definition under Left anterior arm.
Left anterolateral ray.—tIn the Comasteridx (see Orientation 3).
Left lateral interradial area.—See Axis and Orientation.
Left posterior arm.—The arm or ray immediately to the left of the anal area; the
disk ambulacra leading from its base form the left boundary of the anal area
(see Axis and Omentation).
Left posterior post-radial series.—See definition under Left posterior arm.
Left posterior ray.—See definition under Left posterior arm.
Left posterolateral ray.—In the Comasteride (see Orientation 3).
Ligament pit.—The (usually) well-marked pit or depression situated in the dorsal
ligament fossa just within (below) the center of the transverse ridge (see figs.
9-11, p. 65, 31, 32, p. 71, and 431, 432, p. 349, and p. 114).
Lips.—In the Comasteridx the circumoral ring is more or less differentiated into a
smaller anterior and a larger posterior portion instead of being uniform all
around as is the case in the endocyclic species; the two lobes thus indicated
are commonly referred to as lips.
Longitudinal aris.—See Aris 3.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 93
Fia. 66.
Fig. 67. Fig. 68.
Fics. 66-68.—66, A CROSS SECTION THROUGH THE CENTRODORSAL AND RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF PENTAMETROCRINUS
JAPONICUS FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN, SHOWING THE VARIOUS CAVITIES AND CANALS AND ILLUSTRATING A TYPICAL MACROPHREATE
FORM. THE STRUCTURE IS, IN GENERAL, THE SAME AS THAT OF FLOROMETRA ASPERRIMA (FIG. 67); THE CENTRAL CAVITY IN THE
CENTRODORSAL IS LARGER, AND THE ROSETTE IS SOMEWHAT MORE DORSAL IN POSITION; THERE IS THUS NO ROOM FOR THE
RADIAL WATER VESSEL BENEATH THE CANAL LODGING THE AXIAL CORD, BUT THE INTERRADIAL WATER VESSEL, ON THE OTHEH
SIDE OF THE FIGURE, IS LARGER; THE REENTRANT ANGLE ON THE RIGHT SIDE, REPRESENTING THE DORSAL LIGAMENT FOSSA
CUT ACROSS, IS NOT SO DEEP AS IN FLOROMETRA ASPERRIMA. THE MIDRADIAL SECTION (LEFT-HAND SIDE) PASSES JUST
PROXIMAL TO THE MIDDLE OF THE RADIAL; THE INTERMUSCULAR SEPTUM IS SEEN RUNNING TO THE OPENING OF THE CANAL;
THE DEPTH OF THE MUSCULAR FOSSE IS SHOWN BY THE TUBULAR OUTER PORTION OF THE CANAL. 67, A CROSS SECTION
THROUGH THE CENTRODORSAL AND RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF FLOROMETRA ASPERRIMA FROM ALASKA, SHOWING
THE VARIOUS CAVITIES AND CANALS AND ILLUSTRATING A MACROPHREATE FORM WHICH HAS ASSUMED MANY OLIGOPHREATE
CHARACTERS. THE DIVIDING LINE BETWEEN THE CENTRODORSAL AND THE RADIAL PENTAGON IS INDICATED BY A SERIES OF
SHORT PARALLEL LINES DENOTING A SYNOSTOSIS; THAT ON THE RIGHT IS LOW, AS IT PASSES THROUGH A MIDRADIAL PLANE;
THAT ON THE LEFT IS HIGH, AS IT CUTS THROUGH THE INTERRADIAL ANGLE WHERE THE VENTRAL SURFACE OF THE CENTRO-
DORSAL RISES INTO A RIDGE. THE CENTRAL CAVITY INCLOSING THE CENTRAL CAPSULE IS SHOWN WITHIN THE CENTRODORSAL;
FOUR CIRRUS VESSELS LEADING FROM IT ARE CUT LONGITUDINALLY; VENTRALLY THE CENTRAL CAVITY IS BOUNDED BY THE
ROSETTE, A THIN LOBATE PLATE SHOWN HERE CUT ACROSS THE MIDDLE. IN THE RADIAL ON THE RIGHT, WHICH IS CUT LONGI-
TUDINALLY ALONG THE DORSOVENTRAL PLANE, IS SHOWN THE BLIND END OF THE RADIAL WATER TUBE AND, ABOVE IT, THE
AXIAL CANAL INCLOSING THE DORSAL NERVE OF THE ARM; IN THE RADIAL TO THE LEFT, THE LATERAL FACE OF WHICH IS
EXPOSED, IS SEEN THE CANAL LODGING THE RADIAL COMMISSURE. 68, A CROSS SECTION THROUGH THE CENTRODORSAL AND
RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PINGUIS FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN, SHOWING THE VARIOUS CAVITIES AND
CANALS AND ILLUSTRATING A TYPICAL OLIGOPHREATE FORM. THE DETAILS MAY BE READILY UNDERSTOOD BY COMPARISON
WITH THE FIGURE OF A SIMILAR SECTION OF FLOROMETRA ASPERRIMA (FIG. 67); THE LINES MARKING THE SYNOSTOSIS
BETWEEN THE RADIALS AND THE VENTRAL SIDE OF THE CENTRODORSAL ON THE LEFT ARE LONGER THAN THOSE ON THE RIGHT,
INDICATING THE PRESENCE OF A BASAL RAY; THE CENTRAL CAVITY IN THE CENTRODORSAL HAS BECOME VERY SHALLOW; AND
THE CENTRAL CAPSULE HAS BECOME DISPLACED VENTRALLY, SO THAT IT LIES LARGELY WITHIN THE RADIAL PENTAGON INSTEAD
OF ENTIRELY WITHIN THE CENTRODORSAL, AS IN TYPICAL MACROPHREATE FORMS; THE ROSETTE LIES DEEPLY WITHIN THE
DORSAL SIDE OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON. THE FUNNEL-SHAPED SPACE WITHIN THE RADIAL PENTAGON IS FILLED WITIT A
LOOSE CALCAREOUS NETWORK, FORMING THE CENTRAL PLUG.
94 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Loose suture.—A union between two contiguous calcareous plates formed of amor-
phous connective tissue, by which the plates are but loosely joined together
(see Suture).
Lumen.—The interior cavity of a more or less tubular structure.
M.
Marginal cirri.—The cirri developed along the inferior (proximal) margin of the
centrodorsal (see figs. 81, p. 134, and 85, p. 139, and pp. 294-295).
Marginal furrow.—An ambulacial furrow which runs along the edge of the disk
in a horseshoe-shaped course, the mouth being in the center of the furrow (sec
figs. 25-28, p. 69).
Marginal furrows are only found in the families Comasteride and Uinta-
crinide.
Marginal mouth—A mouth is said to be marginal when it is situated upon the
margin of the disk, in the center of a horseshoe-shaped marginal ambulacral
furrow (see figs. 25-28, p. 69).
Median column.—Of cirrus sockets; the midradial columns in each radial area
(see figs. 198, p. 237, 200, p. 239, and 208-214, p. 241, and pp. 244-247).
Middle pinnules.—See Genital pinnules.
Midradial furrows—Furrows on the inner or ventral faces of the radials occupying
the median line (see figs. 435, and 445a, p. 351, and p. 374).
Midradial gap.—The bare midradial area, bounded on either side by a lateral
column of cirrus sockets, seen in certain types of centrodorsals (see fig. 196, p.
237).
Midradial intermuscular furrow.—See Intermuscular furrow.
Mouth.—The anterior opening of the digestive tube, situated at the focus of the disk
ambulacra; it occupies the center of the disk in all comatulids except those
belonging to the genus Uintacrinus, and most of those belonging to the family
Comasteride (see figs. 15-19, p. 67, and pp. 110-111).
Multibrachiate—Having more than 10 arms; that is, possessing IIBr series;
this term is not applied to the species of Promachocrinus which have 20 arms,
arising from 10 radials, each post-radial series dividing once.
Multiplicative regeneration.—See Regeneration A4.
Muscle plates —(1) The Muscular fosse.
(2) The articulating surface of a muscular articulation.
Muscular articulations.—See Articulations.
Muscular fossex.—The most distal (ventral) pair of fosse on the articulating surface
of a muscular articulation, serving for the attachment of the muscles (see
figs. 9-11, p. 65, 31, 32, p. 71, and 431, p. 349, and p. 114).
NV.
Naked disk.—A disk upon which no caleareous deposits are visible under ordinary
examination (see figs. 15-17, p. 67).
Nodals.—In the pentacrinites, the columnals which bear cirri (see fig. 127, p. 197).
Nonmuscular articulations—See Articulations B.
Non-tentaculiferous arms.—See Grooveless arms.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 95
0.
Oblique muscular articulation.—See Articulations Ab.
Opposing spine.—The spine, ridge, or projection on the dorsal side of the penultimate
curus segment; the last dorsal spine (see figs. 4, p 63, and 314-318, p. 273, and
pp. 279-282).
Oral.—Situated near the border of the disk, but not on its surface (see figs. 1, p. 60,
and 6, p. 63, and pp. 112-113).
Oral pinnules.—The pinnules of the proximal part of the arm which do not bear
gonads, and usually do not possess ambulacra (see figs. 1, p. 60, and 6, p. 63,
and pp. 112-113).
Oral surface—See Adoral.
Orals.—Large more or less triangular plates forming a circlet on the disk about the
mouth; they are interradial in position and are developed above the basals,
from which they may be separated by interradials; though well developed in
the young of all comatulids, they are in almost all cases entirely resorbed before
the adult stage is reached. The orals probably correspond to the teeth of
echinoids (see figs. 117, p. 183, 407-413, p. 317, 530, pl. 2, 532, 533, pl. 3, and
542, 544, 547, 548, pl. 4, and pp. 340-341).
Orientation—Two methods have been employed to designate the various radii
and interradi: of the comatulids:
(1) The animal is placed with the dorsal side down, and the disk upper-
most; the different rays are now distinguished as a, the Anterior; 6, the Left
anterior; c, the Right anterior; d, the Left posterior; and, e, the Right posterior
(see fig. 22, p. 69, and pp. 110-111); the interradial areas being known as a, the
Left anterior; b, the Right anterior; c, the Left lateral; d, the Right lateral; and
e, the Posterior.
(2) The animal is placed in the same position; the different rays are
distinguished as Ray A (anterior), Ray B, Ray C, Ray D, and Ray E, counting
from left to right following the hands of the clock; the primary derivatives of
the rays (the IIBr series and their derivatives) are represented by inferior
numbers, these being, beginning with the left-hand branch of the anterior ray,
A,, A,, B,, B., C,, C,, D,, D,, E,, and E,; following this system the interradii
are called Interradius A—B, Interradius B-C, Interradius C—D (the posterior),
Interradius D-H, and Interradius E—A.
(3) In those comasterids in which the mouth is interradial (situated in
the right anterior interradius, or interradius A—-B) the left posterior ray (D)
which is opposite to it often becomes greatly modified, resulting in a swinging
of the true anteroposterior axis from its original position through an are of 36°,
so that it traverses the center of the right anterior interradius (A—B) and the
center of the left posterior arm; in this case the right anterior interradius is
sometimes spoken of as the Anterior interradius, and the left posterior arm as
the Posterior arm, with a corresponding change in regard to all the other radii
and interradii (see figs. 27, 28, p. 69).
96 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Ossicles.—The calcareous segments or plates of which the crinoid skeleton is com-
posed; the term is not employed to include the smaller dermal plates and
spicules.
Outer cirrals—See Distal cirrals.
Overlapping spines.—Spines developed in the median or submedian line of the
brachials which extend obliquely forward, thus overlapping the bases of the
succeeding brachials (see figs. 35, p. 73, 46, p. 81, 94 (outer part of arms),
p. 155, and 99, p. 160).
Ovoid bodies—Dark, more or less spherical bodies seen in the substance of the
pinnules of the ungrooved posterior arms of certain comasterids; these are
sometimes known as sensory bodies.
1 es
Pair.—Of pinnules; two immediately succeeding pinnules, each of which is on the
opposite side of the arm from the other.
This term is not used except in reference to the proximal pinnules, of
which the pairs are P, and P,, P, and P,, P, and P,, etc. (see fig. 6, p. 63).
Ungrooved arms such as are found on the posterior radu of certain of the
Comasteridx, end in a pair of pinnules, both of these pinnules arising from a
single axillary brachial (see fig. 47, p. 81, and p. 110).
Of arms; see Arm pair.
Paired dorsal spines.—Dorsal spines which occur, two on each cirral, side by side in
a line at right angles to the longitudinal axis of the cirrus (see figs. 345-348,
p. 289, 349, 350, p. 291, and pp. 284-285).
Palmar axillary (I11Br,,).—The third postradial axillary; the terminal ossicle of
the palmar (IIIBr) series.
Palmar pinnules (Py).—Pinnules developed on the ossicles of the I1IBr (palmar)
series.
Palmars (111 Br).—The ossicles of the third division series; they are two, three or
four in number, and, so far as known, always terminate in an axillary which
may bear either two undivided arms or two post-palmar (IVBr) series.
Parambulacral.—Bordering the ambulacral grooves.
Partial regeneration.—Of the cirri (see Regeneration, B2).
Pentacrini.—Pentagonal or stellate columnals, such as are found in the columns
of the pentacrinites; this term is usually applied to these columnars only when
found fossil.
Pentacrinoid.—The stalked larva of a comatulid; this term is commonly restricted
so as to refer to the period between the formation of the arms and the loss of
the stem (see fig. 533, pl. 3).
Pentacrinoid larva.—See Pentacrinoid.
Pentagonal base.—The five radials in situ, including within them the rosette.
Pentamerous symmetry.—See Symmetry and Azis.
Penultimate segment.—Of the cirri, the segment which bears the terminal claw on
its distal end, and the opposing spine on its dorsal side (see figs. 314, 315,
317, 318, p. 273, and pp. 278-280).
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 97
Perisome.—The noncaleareous integument covering the ventral surface of the
animal; in general this term is restricted so that it refers only to the integu-
ment covering the ventral and lateral portions of the disk (see figs. 1, p. 60,
2, p. 61, 6, p. 63, and 15-18, p. 67).
Perisomic interradials.—Perisomic plates arising secondarily between the division
series on the outer (dorsal) surface of the disk (see fig. 104, p. 167, and p- 339).
Perisomic plates.—More or less irregular plates developed within the cutis (see figs.
8, p. 63, 18, 19, p. 67, and 122, p. 191, and p. 195).
Perisomic skeleton.—The dermal skeleton developed in the perisome of the adult
animal.
Perisomic spicules.—Spicules developed within the cutis.
Peristome.—The depressed area on the disk immediately surrounding the mouth
(see fig. 15, p. 67).
Perradial.—Same as radial, as contrasted with interradial.
Phytocrinoid.—See Pentacrinoid.
Pinnulars.—The segments of the pinnules (see figs. 6-8, p. 63).
Pinnulation—The arrangement of the pinnules (see pp. 112-113).
Pinnule ambulacra.—The ambulacral grooves on the ventral surface of the pin-
nules, in contrast to those on the ventral surface of the arms and of the disk.
Pinnule sockets —The articular facets on the brachials to which the pinnules are
articulated; they are in origin degenerate muscular fossz (see fig. 32, p. 71,
and p. 273).
Pinnules.—The slender jointed structures which border the arms (see figs. 1, p. 60,
2, p. 61, 3, p. 62, 6, 8, p. 63, and pp. 112-113).
Plate.—As usually employed this term covers calcareous structures which are much
broader than their interior-exterior diameter.
Plated ambulacra.—Ambulacra which are protected by well-developed side and
covering plates (see figs. 7, p. 63, 18, 19, p. 67, and 55, p. 81, and p. 112).
Plated disk.—A disk upon which secondary calcareous dermal plates are developed
(see figs. 7, p. 63, and 55, p. 81, and pp. 111-112).
Polar cirri.—See Small mature cirri.
Posterior arm.—See Axis 1b and Orientation 3.
Posterior interradial area.—See Axis and Orientation.
Posterior radii.—The radii on either side of the anal interambulacral area (see
figs. 22-25, p. 69, 117, p. 183, and pp. 111, 152-161).
In certain of the Comasteride the left posterior radius becomes curiously
modified, and is then often distinguished simply as the posterior radius, the right
posterior radius being considered in this case as an anterior radius (see figs.
27, 28, p. 69, and pp. 111, 152-161).
Posterior ray.—In the Comasteridx (see Orientation 3).
Posterior rays.—See Posterior radit.
Post-palmars.—(IVBr, VBr, V. IBr, etc.)—Series of two, three, or four ossicles,
always ending in an axillary, developed beyond the palmars (IIIBr series).
When this term is used the successive series are designated as first post-
palmers (IVBr series), second post-palmars (VBr series), third post-palmars
(VIBr series), etc.
98 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Postradial series —All the ossicles, collectively, which are borne by a single radial.
Prebrachial stage-—See Cystid stage.
Primary anteroposterior axis.—See Axis la.
Primary arm.—A term sometimes used to designate the [Br series.
Primary cords.—The five nerve trunks which arise from the central capsule (see
figs. 63, 64, p. 89, and pp. 850-354).
Primary groove trunks.—See Groove trunks 1.
Primary interradials.—See Interradials 1.
Primary skeleton.—The Radial skeleton, plus the centrale, the centrodorsal, or the
column.
Primibrachs (IBr).—The ossicles following the radials up to, and including, the first
post-radial axillary; in case the arm does not divide all the brachials are regarded
as primibrachs; while this term is convenient as indicating the ossicles of the
first division series, these are by no means always homologous, and therefore
the primibrachs of one species may be morphologically entirely different from
the primibrachs of another (see figs. 1, p. 60, and 30, p. 71).
Prismatic angles.—When the pinnules are prismatic, that is, triangular in cross
section, as in the species of Calometride, Thalassometride and Charitome-
tride, the median dorsal line becomes narrowed into a sharp gabel-like ridge
and the ventrolateral borders become similarly sharpened; in a section of
such a pinnule the median dorsal line and the ventrolateral borders stand
out prominently as three sharp angles which are known as the prismatic angles.
On the distal edges of the pinnulars it is at these angles, more particularly
the dorsal, that the production or overlap and the development of spines
reaches its maximum, and in many types in which the prismatic condition of
the pinnules is but faintly indicated the great excess of spinosity at these
points shows the potential existente of prismatic angles (see fig. 54, p. 81).
Prismatic pinnules.—Pinnules which are more or less sharply triangular in cross
section; they are characteristic of the families Thalassometride, Charitome-
tride, and Calometride; prismatic pinnules are associated with the presence
along the pinnule ambulacra of well-developed side and covering plates (see
figs. 49, 53, 54, p. 81, and 93, p. 153).
Proximal.—See Distal.
Proximal border.—Of the centrodorsal; same as Inferior margin.
Proximal cirrals.—The cirrus segments between the short outer segments which
bear dorsal processes and the short basal segments; this term is used in con-
trast to Distal or Outer cirrals.
Proximal columnal.—The columnal immediately beneath the calyx.
In the comatulids this columnal separates from the one just beneath it
and increases enormously in size, becoming, wholly or in part, the centrodorsal.
Proximal pinnules.—Same as Oral pinnules.
Proximale.—In the post-palxozoic crinoids (excepting those belonging to the families
Enecrinidx, and Plicatocrinide which are of the palwozoic type) the column
possesses a definite growth limit; when this is attained the topmost columnal
typically enlarges, becoming permanently attached to the calyx by a close
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 99
suture and to the following columnal by a modified close suture or so-called
stem syzygy (which has no true morphological relationship with the superfici-
ally similar brachial syzygy) forming a proximale, which may be shortly
described as a columnal secondarily modified into an apical calyx plate.
The proximale in its typical form is rare among the recent crinoids, but
appears as the centrodorsal in the comatulids, which, however, discard the
column between it and the next succeeding columnal. In the pentacrinites
the proximale and the larval column are indefinitely repeated throughout life.
In Bathycrinus and allied genera the proximale is many times reduplicated so’
that a large number occur; but, instead of being distributed throughout the
column as in the pentacrinites, they are all restricted to the summit, forming a
cylinder or cone just beneath the crown.
Pseudo-basal rays.—The interradial ridges on the ventral surface of the centrodorsal
which, though an integral part of that structure, are indicated on its outer
surface by rounded tubercles resembling the ends of the basal rays (see fig.
250, p. 253, and pp. 330, 331).
Pseudosyzygy.—A non-muscular articulation closely resembling a syzygy, but of
entirely different origin, being developed from a synarthry; it occurs only in
places where a synarthry would be expected to be present.
In certain species in which the synarthrial articulations become so close
that motion is rendered impossible, the synarthrial articular faces becomes .
modified by the disintegration of the longitudinal ridge into several smaller
radiating ridges, while numerous additional radiating ridges, usually more or
less irregular, are developed so that the articulation, both externally and inter-
nally, comes to have all the appearance of a true syzygy (see figs. 37-40,
p. 75, and p. 113).
is
Radial.—Lying in the same line as the radii diverging from the radials.
Radial areas.—(1) The five areas in which lie the radials, or through the center of
which run the ambulacra.
(2) On the centrodorsal, the five areas included between lines drawn from
the ends of the basal rays, or the interradial sutures, to the apex of the centro-
dorsal or to the center of the dorsal pole (see figs. 192, 194, 196, p. 237, 200,
203, 204, 207, p. 239, 208-216, p. 241, and pp. 230-232).
Radial articular faces.—The outer faces of the radials, which bear the straight muscu-
lar articulations by which the radials are articulated to the first post-radial
ossicles (see figs. 431, 432, p. 349, 439, 440, p. 351).
Radial azillary—A term formerly used for the [Br or costal axillary.
Radial canals —The tubular structures, more or less complete, within the calcareous
skeleton of the calyx which contain the radial prolongations of the water
vascular system (see p. 322).
Radial circlet—The ring formed by the five radials.
Radial cleft—See Subradial cleft.
Radial commissure.—See Commissure.
100 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Radial faces —See Radial articular faces.
Radial mouth.—In those species of the Comasteride in which the mouth is excentric
or marginal it is situated either at the base of the anterior ray, or between the
bases of the anterior and right anterior rays; in the first case it is known as
a radial mouth, and in the second as an interradial mouth (see fig. 25, and
compare with figs. 26-28, p. 69).
Radial pentagon.—The more or less pentagonal ring formed by the five radials,
mutually adherent, after the removal of all other structures (see figs. 441-448,
p. 351, which represent two-fifths of a radial pentagon).
Radial radials.—In the genus Promachocrinus, the radials which occupy the normal
radial position, in contrast to the interradial radials, which are situated in the
interradial angles over the ends of the basal rays (see figs. 505, p. 371, and 549,
pl. 5, and pp. 191-194).
Radial ridges.—On the centrodorsal; the ridges sometimes developed in the mid-
radial portion of the lateral surface (see figs. 9, p. 65, 227, p. 245, and pp. 230-232).
Radial skeleton—The Appendicular skeleton plus the Radials.
Radial structures —(1) Structures associated with the radials.
(2) Structures radially situated.
Radially situated —See Radial.
Radials (RR).—The five plates from which the arms arise. These are in the same
line as the infrabasals and alternate in position with the basals and orals. The
radials are the most important plates in the crinoid calyx; they are always
present and undergo comparatively little change of form; in the comatulids
their size is reduced to a minimum (see figs. 2, p. 61, 3, p. 62, 9-12, 14, p. 65,
30, p. 71, 433-446, p. 351, and pp. 348-382).
In two genera, Promachocrinus and Thaumatocrinus, there are 10
radials, 5 in the usual position, and 5 interradial situated in line with the
basals and orals; the former are the 5 radials of the other genera, while the
latter are secondarily derived from interradials.
The radials are the equivalent of the terminals of the asteroids, and of the
ambulacrals bordering the peristome in the urchins.
Radianal (RA).—A plate occurring in the pentacrinoid young of the comatulids sit-
uated between the two posterior radials, usually more or less accommodated in a
concavity in the radial to the right of the posterior interradius, and resting
on the posterior basal, usually to the right of the median line, at the base of the
anal tube; in most developing comatulids it is the only prominent interradial
plate; it is always resorbed early in post-embryonic life (see figs. 413, p. 317,
553, pl. 5, 560-562, pl. 6, 576, pl. 9, 588, pl. 13, and 594, pl. 16, and pp. 331-335).
Heretofore this plate has always been incorrectly called the anal, under
the supposition that it represented the anal z of fossil forms..
The normal position of the radianal, in which it occurs in most of the
fossil types in which it is developed, is beneath the right posterior radial,
between that radial and the infrabasal; it is the last remnant of a circlet of
five subradial plates.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 101
Radicular cirri.—Irregular branching cirrus-like structures developed on the ter-
minal columnals; they are primarily a development from the primitive terminal
stem plate (see figs. 5, p. 63, 540, 541, Dleo)e
Ray.—A radial, together with all the structures which it bears.
Reductive regeneration.—See Regeneration A2.
Regeneration.—The rejuvenation of lost parts; Minckert recognized four types of
arm regeneration among crinoids, as follows:
(Al) Reproductive regeneration.—The replacing of an arm lost by one
similar to it.
(A2) Reductive regeneration.—Regeneration resulting in a decrease in
the number of arms.
(A3) Augmentative regeneration.—The regeneration of an axillary and a
pair of arms in the place of a single arm lost.
(A4) Multiplicative regeneration.—The simultaneous regeneration of sev-
eral arms in the place of one lost.
In the regeneration of the cirri he recognized two types, as follows:
(B1) Entire regeneration—In which a cirrus, lost at the articulation
between it and the centrodorsal, is replaced, and
(B2) Partial regeneration.—In which a cirrus broken off at some distance
from the base, regenerates the lost distal portion (see fig. 319, p. 275, and
p. 294).
Reproductive regeneration.—See Regeneration Al.
Resorption.—The dissolution and subsequent disappearance of any calcareous
structure.
Right anterior arm.—See Axis and Orientation.
Right anterior interradial area.—See Axis and Orientation.
Right anterior ray.—See ‘Aris and Orientation.
Right anterolateral ray.—See Axis and Orientation
Right lateral interradial area.—See Axis and Orientation.
Right posterior arm.—See Aris and Orientation.
Right posterior ray.—See Avis and Orientation.
Right posterolateral ray.—See Axis and Orientation.
Rosette.—A delicate calcareous plate with five radial and five interradial processes
situated within the cirelet of radials just below the dorsal surface of the radial
pentagon; it is formed by a curious process of transformation from the five
larval basals, and is not found except in the comatulids, among which it is
of almost universal occurrence so far as the recent forms are concerned, being
absent only in the genus Atelecrinus (see figs. 12, p. 65, 230, 231, p- 247,301,
p. 264, 447-452, p. 353, 453-458, p. 355, 459-464, p. 357, 466-469, p. 359, 471-
476, p. 361, 477-482, p. 363, 483-489, p. 365, 490-495, p. 367, 496-501, p. 369,
503-508, p. 371, 509, 510, 512, 513, p. 373, 577, 578, pl. 10, and 589-591,
pl. 14, and pp. 320-324).
Row.—Of cirrus sockets, a horizontal series, as contrasted with a column, or vertical
series (see figs. 149, p. 220, and 202, p. 239, and pp. 226-228).
102 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
S.
Saceuli—Small globular or ovate sacs which occur, often abundantly, along the
edges of the ambulacral grooves of the disk, arms and pinnules; in preserved
specimens they are usually dark brownish or reddish, and very conspicuous,
but sometimes are nearly colorless; they also occur in the interior of the
body; they are not found in the species of the family Comasteride (see figs. 15,
16, p. 67, and p. 111).
Second brachial (Br,).—(1) The ossicle which bears upon its distal face the first
oblique muscular articulation (see fig. 30, p. 71), and normally also P,.
(2) The second ossicle of the free undivided arm.
Second pinnule (P,).—The pinnule borne by the fourth brachial of the free undi-
vided arm; it is absent in a number of species belonging to various genera (see
fig. 6, p. 63).
Secondary anteroposterior axis.—See Axis 1b.
Secondary bilateral symmetry.—See Symmetry and Azis.
Secondary cords.—The nerve cords after their first division as far as the intraradial
commissure (see figs. 63, p. 89, and 65, p. 91).
Secondary groove trunks.—See Groove trunks 2.
Secondary interradials—See Interradials 2.
Secondary skeleton.—See Perisomic skeleton.
Secundibrachs (I1Br).—The undivided series of- ossicles following the IBr axillary;
this series may terminate in an axillary or may remain undivided. In the
latter case the term secundibrachs is not now employed, but the ossicles are
considered as constituting the free arm (see fig. 29, p. 71).
Segment.—An individual ossicle from a linear series.
Sense organ.—See Sensory organs.
Sensory organs.—Same as Ovoid bodies.
Separated rays or division series.—Rays or division series which diverge sufficiently
so that the perisome is readily visible between them (see figs. 41, 42, p. 77, 89,
p- 147, and 98, p. 159).
Side plates.—Small, usually squarish or oblong, plates developed along the ambu-
lacra of the arms and pinnules just outside of the covering plates; that is,
between the covering plates and the ventral edges of the brachials or pinnulars;
side plates are always accompanied by covering plates, though the latter often
occur alone, as in the genera Nemaster and Comatilia, and in many stalked
groups (see figs. 7, p. 63, and 55, p. 81, and p. 112).
Simple extraneous arm division.—Arm division in which all of the branchings are of
the extraneous type, as in Metacrinus.
Skeleton.—Strictly speaking, the entire calcareous framework of the animal, but
used by most authors to indicate the calcareous framework or the dorsal
surface of the arms, calyx, and pinnules.
Small mature cirri.—The apical and subapical cirri, when differentiated from the
peripheral by their smaller size (see figs. 310, 311, p. 269, and pp. 250-251);
(see Large mature cirri).
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 103
Smooth cirri.—Cirri without dorsal spines or processes on the distal segments (see
figs. 312, 313, p. 271, 316, p. 273, 327, 328, p. 281, 340, p. 287, 356, p. 293, 360,
p- 295, 371-373, 376, p. 299, 404, p. 311, and 414, 415, p. 319, and pp. 286-292).
Soft parts—(1) A comprehensive term used to include all the organs or systems
except those directly concerned in the formation of the skeleton.
(2) The visceral mass.
Spherodes.—See Ovoid bodies.
Spicules.—Small, sharp-ended calcareous structures developed in the perisome, or
in the walls of the internal organs; they may occur in the tentacles; the spicules
occurring along the borders of the ambulacral grooves in many species are in
reality rudimentary side and covering plates.
Spiny cirrt.—Curi which have dorsal spines or processes developed on their outer
segments (see figs. 323, p. 277, 325, p. 279, 333, p. 283, 336-339, p. 285, 341-343,
p. 287, 347-348, p. 289, and pp. 286-292).
Spout-like processes.—The interradial processes of the rosette.
Stalk.—See Column.
Star stones.—See Pentacrina.
Stem.—See Column.
Stem syzygy.—An intercolumnar articulation occurring between the proximale and
the next ossicle below it, or between the reduplications of the proximale and the
ossicles next beneath (in the comatulid column between the centrodorsal and
the next following segment, and in the pentacrinite column between each nodal
and the following infranodal) which superficially resembles a brachial syzygy,
more particularly a brachial syzygy of the type occurring in the pentacrinites.
It is in reality, however, a modification of a close suture and has no morpholog-
ical relationship to the brachial syzygy.
Straight muscular articulation.—See Articulations Aa.
Subambulacral plates.—Plates developed beneath the ambulacral grooves.
Subcentral mouth.—A mouth is said to be subcentral when it is anterior to the center
of the ventral surface of the disk, and the two posterior ambulacra are more or
less longer than the other three.
Submarginal anus.—An anus situated just within the outer margin of the anal area
(see figs. 18, p. 67, and 117, p. 183).
Subradial cleft—A deep, narrow cleft extending inward between the dorsal surface
of the radials and the apposed surface of the centrodorsal in the comatulids; it
usually reaches from the end of one basal ray to the end of the one adjacent;
it always ends blindly (see figs. 194, p. 237, 203-205, p. 239, 208-216, p. 241,
and 531, pl. 2). ;
The subradial cleft is the homologue of the interarticular pores of the
pentacrinites.
Subradials.—The plates situated immediately beneath the radials, between the
radials and the infrabasals. It is very rare to find subradials developed all
around the calyx, but in many types a single subradial occurs, beneath the
right posterior radial, which has received the distinctive name of Radianal.
104 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Subradials do not occur in the adults of any of the recent species, but
the right posterior subradial, or radianal, is a large and conspicuous plate in
all pentacrinoid larvee.
De Koninck used the term subradial as the equivalent of basal, but in
this use he has not been followed by subsequent authors.
Supplementary ligament fosse.—Triangular ligament fossee developed on the outer
ends of the transverse ridge (see fig. 432, p. 349).
Supplementary muscle plates.—Thin plates developed in the proximal inner angle
of the muscular fosse, and lying upon the muscular fosse; their function and
significance are not understood, but their outer margin may mark the limit of a
growth stage characterized by thick muscle plates, short muscle fibers, and a
less flexible articulation than that of the adult, or they may be developed as a
result of the partial deterioration and shortening of the imner fibers of the
muscle bundles (see fig. 431, p. 349).
Supranodal.—The columnal immediately above a nodal (see fig. 127, p. 197).
Supra-palmars.—See Post-palmars.
Suture.—A union of two adjacent ossicles formed of amorphous connective tissue
strands; sutures are of two kinds:
(1) Loose suture.—A suture in which the connecting strands of connective
tissue are entirely devoid of any calcareous deposit, allowing of a certain
amount of play between the plates.
(2) Close suture.—A suture in which there has been more or less of a deposit
of caleareous matter on the apposed edges of the plates so that, though not
welded together, they are immovably united.
Symmetry.—Three types of symmetry, occur in the comatulids, as follows:
(1) Bilateral symmetry, in the free swimming larve.
(2) Pentamerous symmetry, in the adults of most of the species; this
pentamerous symmetry is never quite perfect, the digestive system, for instance,
never being affected by it (see figs. 22-24, p. 69, 77, p. 130, 78, p. 131, 80,
p. 133, 101, p. 163, 107, p. 173, and pp. 152-161).
(3) Secondary bilateral symmetry, in the adults of certain species of the
family Comasteride (see figs. 26-28, p. 69, 45, p. 79, and pp. 110-111); (see
Axis and Orientation).
Synarthrial tubercles—Dorsal external tubercles developed on the line of union
between two ossicles joined by synarthry (see figs. 86, p. 141, 110, p. 176,
112, p. 179).
Synarthry.—See Articulations Ba.
Synostosis.—A complete welding cf two adjacent plates through the medium of cal-
careous interdeposition.
Syzygial pair.—aA pair of brachials, or of any other ossicles, united by syzygy (see
fig. 35, p. 73, and p. 113).
Syzygium.—See Syzygy.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 105
Syzygy.—(1) An immovable articulation formed exclusively of ligament fibers; in
the comatulids the apposed faces are marked with numerous fine radiating
ridges; externally the syzygy appears as a narrow usually whitish line run-
ning across the arm at right angles to the longitudinal axis (see figs. 2, p. 61,
6, p. 63, 30, 34, p. 71, and 35, p. 73, and p. 113).
(2) This term is often used to denote a pair of ossicles united by syzygy,
that is, a syzygial pair.
(3) Pourtalés has used this word as the equivalent of intersyzygial inter-
val, in Minckert’s sense; that is, to denote all the brachials between two adja-
cent syzygies.
Ee.
Tegmen or tegmen calycis.—See Disk.
Terminal azillary.—In the comasterids, the terminal orachial of an ungrooved arm,
when that brachial bears two pinnules instead of one pinnule and another
brachial as usual (see fig. 47, p. 81).
Terminal claw.—The conical, sharp pointed, more or less curved ossicle which forms
the termination of a cirrus (see figs. 4, p. 63, 314-318, p. 273, and pp. 276-278).
Terminal comb.—See Comb.
Terminal pinnules.—The pinnules of the extreme arm tip (see figs. 46, 47, p. 81).
Terminal stem plate.—The Dorsocentral.
Tertibrachs (II1IBr).—The ossicles composing a division series or an arm arising
from a IIBr (distichal) axillary; the palmars.
Tetrabrachs (IVBr).—The ossicles composing a division series or an arm arising
from a IBr (palmar) axillary; the first post-palmars.
Topmost columnal.—See Proximal columnal.
Transition segment.—The segment upon which the transition between the longer
smooth and the shorter spinous (distal) cirrus segments takes place; the transi-
tion segment usually resembles the segments preceding in its proximal two-
thirds, and the segments succeeding in its distal third; it is commonly darker
in color than any of the other cirrus segments (see figs. 4, p. 63, 363-367, p. 297,
and pp. 290-292).
Transverse ridge—(1) On the joint faces of a muscular articulation, the strong
ridge crossing the joint face just dorsal to the central canal and separating the
large single dorsal ligament fossa from the paired interarticular ligament
fosse; it serves as the fulcrum upon which the motion at the articulation is
accommodated (see figs. 9-11, p. 65, 31, 32, p.71, and 431, p. 349, and p. 114).
(2) On the dorsal surface of the cirrus segments, a serrate ridge, some-
times more or less crescentic, which traverses the segments at right angles to
the longitudinal axis; it is commonly central or subterminal in position; trans-
verse ridges on the cirrus segments are only developed in a few genera (see
figs. 345, p. 289, 349, 352, p. 291, and 353, p. 293, and p. 109).
Triangular pinnules.—See Prismatic pinnules.
79146°—Bull. 82—15——8
106 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Triangular processes.—The interradial processes of the rosette (see figs. 577, 578,
pl. 10, and 589, 590, pl. 14, and pp. 320-322).
Tripled dorsal spines.—Dorsal spines which occur, three on each cirral, in a line at
right angles to the longitudinal axis of the cirrus (see fig. 348, p. 289).
Trivium.—In species of comasterids possessing ungrooved arms and primary bilat-
eral symmetry, the three anterior arms; that is, the anterior, the right anterior,
and the left anterior arms (see pp. 110, 111); (see Biviwm, Ais, and Orientation).
Trochite.—Fossil columnars, considered individually.
U.
Underbasals.—See Infrabasals.
Ungrooved arms.—Sce Grooveless arms.
Unplated ambulacra.—Ambulacra bordered by rudimentary side and covering
plates not visible on ordinary examination, or by none at all.
Unplated disk.—A disk upon which no epidermal calcareous plates are to be found
on ordinary examination (see figs. 15-17, p. 67).
Upper surface.—The surface of the animal, or the surface of any part of the animal,
which is directed away from the ground or the base when the animal is in
its natural position.
Thus the ventral surface of the animal as a whole is the upper surface.
Of the centrodorsal and the cirri, or the stem, or of their component parts,
the proximal surface or surfaces are the upper, but of the other elements
the distal.
V.
Ventral interradial furrows.—The furrows on the ventral surface of the radial
pentagon which lie over the interradial sutures (see figs. 453, p. 355, 464, p. 357,
465-467, p. 359, 477, 478, p. 363, 488, 489, p. 365, 497, 499, 500, 501, p. 369,
503, 505, 507, 508, p. 371, and 509-511, p. 373, and p. 374).
Ventral margin.—Of the centrodorsal (see Inferior margin).
Ventral perisome.—The perisome of the disk and of the ventral surface of the arms
and pinnules.
Ventral spines.—On the cirri; long overlapping spines sometimes developed on the
distal midventral margin of the earlier segments.
Ventral spines are very rare, but are well developed in the species of the
genus Pterometra.
Ventral surface—See Adoral. Of the centrodorsal, that surface which is in contact
with the radials (see figs. 229-234, p. 247).
Ventrolateral processes.—The produced ventrolateral borders of the ossicles of the
division series and of the first two brachials, as seen in Stephanometra and
Cenometra (see fig. 87, p. 143).
Visceral mass.—The central capsule resting upon the radials and the arm bases
and bounded ventrally by the disk and laterally by the division series and
so-called interradial areas.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 107
Although in reality continuous with its extensions along the ventral
surface of the arms, for convenience the visceral mass is assumed not to extend
out farther than the second brachial, this being the point at which it com-
monly ruptures on being detached from the animal.
Visceral skeleton.—A skeleton, in the form of scattered spicules, developed within
the visceral mass.
W.
Wachsmuth and Springer’s Law.—See Law of Wachsmuth and S pringer.
Wall-sided.—The ossicles of the division series and arm bases are said to be wall-
sided when they are closely appressed against each other, and their appressed
sides are sharply flattened (see figs. 43, p. 77, 88, p. 145, 94, p. 155, 96, p. 159,
99, p. 160, 100, p. 162, 101, 102, p. 163, and 558, pl. 5).
Water pores.—(1) The madreporic pores.
(2) the intersegmental pores.
Whorl.—Of cirri; a row.
EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS.
In the description of a comatulid the number of the cirri is expressed by Roman
numerals, and the number of their component segments by Arabic; thus “cirri XVII,
25” means that the animal has 17 cirri, each with 25 segments.
The division series are designated by the letters “Br” preceded by the figure
(i Roman numerals) denoting the numerical sequence of the series; thus “IBr”
refers to the primibrachs (figs. 1, p. 60, 3, p. 62, 29, p. 71), or the first division series
following the radials (R R), the ‘‘costals” of P. H. Carpenter’s terminology in his later
works, or the ‘second and third radials” of the Challenger reports; IIBr, or secundi-
brachs (fig. 29, p. 71), is equivalent to Carpenter’s ‘‘distichal series,” IIIBr to
“palmar series”’ (fig. 29, p. 71), IVBr to ‘“‘post-palmar series,” ete. The individual
elements of the division series are indicated by so-called inferior numbers; thus
I1Br, means the ‘first distichal” or the first ossicle following the first division series
and IIIBr, means the second ossicle of the “palmar”’ or third division series. The
ossicles of the free undivided arm are referred to simply as brachials.
It should be emphasized that the employment of these symbols is merely a matter
of convenience and does not in any way imply an homoiogy between division series
bearing the same designation in different genera.
The presence of a syzygy is indicated by the use of the symbol ‘“ +’’; thus
“TIBr 4(3+4)” means that the second division series (the secundibrachs or “dis-
tichals’’) are composed of four ossicles, of which the third and fourth are united
by syzy fig. 29, p. 71).
i en: se les of an arm are numbered in regular sequence, P,, P,, P;, P,,
etc.; the inner pinnules are lettered, Pa, Py, P., Pa, ete. (fig. 6, p. 63). The
IBr or “‘costal” pinnule (only found in the genus Fudiocrinus) is given as Po (figs.
83, p. 136, 84, p. 137), the I[Br or “‘distichal” pinnule as P) (fig. 81, p. 134, on the
outer side of the second ossicles above the first axillary), and the I]IBr or “palmar”
pinnule as Pp» (fig. 81, p. 134, the two apparently small pinnules on the second
108 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
ossicles beyond the second axillaries; they lie side by side in the median line of the
figure, the corresponding pinnules on the outer side of the ray are more or less
concealed by the P,), the use of these inferior capitals serving to differentiate these
pinnules from those of the inner side of the arm.
DESCRIPTION OF A COMATULID.
Before taking up the detailed description of the individual structures which
collectively make up the comatulid whole, it would be well to give a short sketch of
the more important features of the comatulid organization in their logical sequence,
in order that these structures may properly be appreciated as integral parts of a
collective entity. It has been a common fault in works of monographie scope to
discuss each structure in great detail without giving a description of the entire animal
as the sum of its component structures, so that, unless the reader is himself possessed
of a very considerable knowledge of the subject, he is often quite unable, without an
enormous amount of study, to appraise each feature of the animal in its true pro-
portion. It is hoped that the following short sketch will serve to present a con-
nected picture of a comatulid whereby the detailed account of each separate structure
will be made more easy of comprehension.
For purposes of systematic description a comatulid (fig. 1, p. 60) is discussed
under eight distinct subheadings, viz:
(1) The CENTRODORSAL,
(2) The Crrrt,
(3) The Basat Rays,
(4) The Raptrats,
(5) The Division sERIEs,
(6) The FREE UNDIVIDED ARMS,
(7) The Disk and Ampunacra, and
(S) The PINNULEs.
This has, after many trials, been found to be the most satisfactory method
of treatment from a systematic point of view.
(1) The Centrodorsal (see figs. 1, p. 60, 14, p. 65, and 29, 30, p. 71) is the
stellate, discoidal, button-like, conical or columnar central or apical plate, from
which all the other structures appear to radiate; it is situated in the exact center
of the aboral (dorsal) side of the animal.
The centrodorsal bears on its sides more or less numerous shallow pits or facets,
each with a small central perforation, known as Cirrus sockets or Cirrus facets (see
figs. 94, p. 155, and 96-98, p. 159), which mark the place of attachment of the Cirri (see
figs. 101, 102, p. 163, and 105, p. 169). These cirrus sockets may be arranged in defi-
nite alternating horizontal rows (see figs. 174, p. 231, and 219, p. 243), or in 5 (see fig.
207, p. 239), 10 (see figs. 190, p. 235, 192, 194, 196, p. 237, 203, 204, p. 239, 215, 216,
p. 241, and 227, p. 245), 15 (see figs. 198, p. 237, 200, p. 239, and 210-214, p- 241), or
20 (see figs. 208, 209, p. 241) definite vertical columns, or may be closely crowded
and quite without any definite arrangement (see figs. 172, p. 231, and 226, p. 243).
In the fully grown of certain species belonging to the family Comasteride the
centrodorsal may be reduced to a small thin pentagonal or stellate plate sunk to,
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 109
or even below, the dorsal surface of the radials, and quite devoid of cirri (see figs.
153-159, p. 221, 162, p. 223, 164, p. 227, and 168-170, p. 229).
(2) The Cirri are slender articulated appendages of practically uniform thick-
ness arising from the pits or cirrus sockets on the sides of the centrodorsal (see
figs. 96-98, p. 159, 306, 307, p. 265, 308, 309, p. 267); they serve to attach the animal
to the sea bottom or to other organisms, such as sponges, corals, gorgonians, fuci,
hydroids, ete. The cirri are composed of a number of segments known as Cirrals,
which, within narrow limits, is definite for each species; they end in a sharp curved
Terminal claw (see figs. 4, p. 63, 314-318, p. 273); the last segment before this termi-
nal claw, known as the Penultimate segment (sec figs. 314-318, p. 273), usually bears
dorsally at or near the distal end a more or less developed sharp process, the
Opposing spine (see fig. 4, p. 63), which opposes the terminal claw, the two terminal
segments together resembling somewhat the chela of a crab; but in the comatulid
the articulated digit is, on account of its very close ligamentous union with the
penultimate segment, immovable.
The cirrals, more especially those in the distal part of the cirri, and more
especially in long cirri, often bear upon the dorsal side sharp single (see fig. 333, p.283),
or double (see fig. 350, p. 291), more rarely triple (see fig. 348, p. 289), Dorsal spines
or tubercles (see fig. 370, p. 299), or serrate Transverse ridges (see fig. 352, p. 291),
and are usually more or less compressed laterally.
In cases where the proximal part of the cirrus is without dorsal spines and
rounded in cross section, and the distal part is laterally compressed and dorsally
spinous, the transition between the two parts is frequently effected within the
compass of a single segment, which resembles the preceding proximally and the
succeeding distally, and is usually darker in color than any of the other segments;
such a segment is known as a Transition segment (see fig. 4, p. 63).
(3) The Basal rays (see figs. 12, p. 65, and 229, p. 247) appear externally as
usually small low tubercular prominences, rounded or more or less rhombic in out-
line, just above the proximal margin of the centrodorsal, between the bases of
adjacent radials (see fig. 415, p. 319). They are frequently entirely absent, or they
may be present in only a few of the five interradial angles.
(4) The Radials (see figs. 14, p. 65, and 30, p. 71), five in number (ten in the two
genera Promachocrinus and Thaumatocrinus), (see figs. 118, 114, p. 181, and 505,
p- 371), usually appear externally as narrow oblong or more or less erescentic plates,
usually somewhat concave anteriorly, and always convex exteriorly (dorsally),
protruding beyond the edge of the centrodorsal; but in many genera they barely
reach the edge of the centrodorsal, while in other genera they may be entirely
concealed by it. J :
(5) Following the radials there are (except in two genera in which a single
undivided series of ossicles arises from each radial) from one (the commonest num-
ber) to eight or nine Division series (see figs. 61, p. 87, 116, p. 183, one, 75, p. 128,
two, 81, p. 134, three, 164, p. 227, four or five) of two, three, or four ossicles
each, each terminating in an axillary from which two similar derivatives,
either further division series or undivided arms, arise. These division series,
usually all morphologically homologous, are known, in order of their occurrence
110 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
as Primibrachs (IBr), Secundibrachs (I]Br), Tertibrachs (I1[Br), Tetrabrachs ([VBr),
ete. The first series (absent in the family Pentametrocrinide and in the genus
Atopocrinus of the Atelecrinide) is invariably composed of two elements, and it is
therefore an easy matter to detect the concealment of the radials by counting
backward from the first post-radial axillary, except in the five-armed genus Ludio-
crinus in which the first division series, though present, does not terminate in an
axillary (see figs. 83, p. 136, 84, p. Sa)
(6) The Free undivided arms (see fig. 29, p. 71) arise from the final axillaries,
and are composed of a linear series of (as viewed dorsally) wedge-shaped and
triangular, or more or less oblong, brachials which end in a growing tip.
In certain species of the family Comasteride from one to six of the arms may
end in an axillary bearing a pair of pinnules (see figs. 45), p. 79, 47, p. 81); such
arms may be recognized by the entire absence of ambulacral grooves, and by their
shortness, they sometimes being not more than one-third, and often not more than
one-half, as long as normal arms (see fig. 45, p. 79).
(7) The Disk (see figs. 15-19, p. 67, and 117, p. 183) is the adoral (ventral)
covering of the internal organs, and appears to unite the bases of the arms on
their ventral side; it is exactly opposite in position to the centrodorsal. The
perisome of the disk is‘continued down between the division series to the radials,
and outward along the ventral surface of the arm to the tip, as well as along the
ventral surface of the pinnules almost to their tips.
The disk is sometimes pentagonal or more or less circular in outline (see figs.
15, 19, p. 67), the outer borders of the interambulacral areas being straight or
slightly convex; but often the outer borders of the interambulacral areas are
strongly concave so that the disk becomes approximately stellate in shape (see figs.
16, 17, p. 67); in the latter case the disk is said to be incised.
The ventral perisome of the outer, and usually the middle, pinnules, and of
the arms is almost invariably marked in the median line by a deep furrow, the
Ambulacral groove (see figs. 15-19, p. 67, and 45a p. 79); the grooves from the various
arms of each ray converge and unite upon the disk, forming five radiating grooves,
which themselves converge to the central or subcentral Mouth (see figs. 15-19, p. 67);
the latter may be readily distinguished as a round, oval, or crescentic opening in
the center of the converging ambulacral grooves.
In the Comasteridw and Uintacrinide the ambulacral grooves from the arms
usually lead into a horseshoe-shaped or erescentice furrow about the margin of the
disk, the mouth being at or near the center of this furrow and therefore marginal
(see figs. 25-28, p. 69), and many of the species belonging to the first-named
family are further peculiar in that ambulacral grooves are often entirely absent
from the posterior rays, and sometimes from many or all of the arms arising from
the other rays (see figs. 27, 28, p. 69, and 45, p. 79).
When the surface of the disk is divided by five subequal converging ambulacral
grooves into five roughly triangular Interambulacral or Interpalmar areas (see figs.
15-19, p. 67), one of these is usually seen to be slightly larger than the rest and
to contain, at or near the center of its margin a conical prominence, perforated at
the tip, the Anal tube (see figs. 15-19, p. 67); this area, which includes the anal
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 111
tube, is known as the anal area, and it is from this area that all crinoids are
oriented, a plane passing through the anal tube and through the mouth, and there-
fore also along the ambulacrum leading to the anterior arm, and through the center
of the so-called anterior radial and anterior post-radial series of ossicles (division
series and free undivided arms), dividing the animal into two equal halves, which
exhibit more or less, in the Comasteride often very pronounced, bilateral symmetry
(See figs. 22-28, p. 69).
In certain species of the Comasteride the mouth moves from the original
position at the base of the anterior ray to a position between the bases of the
anterior and the right anterior rays; this results in making the left branch of the
peripheral ambulacral furrow much longer than the right branch; a balance between
the two is attained by the dwindling and eventual suppression of that part of the
left branch which supplies the left posterior ray, so that the two main ambulacral
furrows are again equal, each supplying two arms or rays, the fifth ray being quite
devoid of ambulacra. This fifth ray, after the loss of its ambulacra, becomes much
reduced in size. There is now a well-marked bilateral symmetry, quite different
from the original bilateral symmetry; a plane passing through the center of the
left posterior arms and division series and along the center of the left posterior
TBr series and radial, thence through the (central) anal tube and interradial mouth
situated between the bases of the anterior and right anterior rays, divides the
animal into two equivalent halves. The plane of bilateral symmetry has therefore
become shifted, in the direction of the movement of the hands of the clock, one-
tenth of a circumference, or 36° (see figs. 27, 28, p. 69).
In the Comasteridz and Uintacrinide the anal area is usually of very much
greater size than any of the other interambulacral areas, including sometimes
almost the entire surface of the disk and forcing the ambulacral grooves and mouth
to a marginal position. The anal tube in these two families is usually nearly or
quite at the center of the disk, whereas in the other families it is marginal or
submarginal (see figs. 22-28, p. 69).
Set closely together in a single line along each side of the ambulacral grooves
of the disk, arms and pinnules (except in the species of the family Comasteride)
are small round bodies, usually (in preserved specimens) yellow, or various shades
of red and violet to nearly black in color (though colorless in life), known as Sacculi
(see figs. 15, 16, p. 67). These sacculi are of some importance systematically,
varying greatly in abundance and in distribution in different groups.
In certain species of the Comasteride there are found upon the posterior un-
grooved arms much larger rounded bodies known variously as Spherodes, Ovoid
bodies or Sense organs.
The perisome of the disk always contains in its inner layers calcareous concre-
tions of secondary (perisomic) origin. These often become much enlarged and
thickened so as to project above the surface of the disk in the form of prominent
calcareous nodules which may be scattered or, if they are very numerous, may
form a solid calcareous pavement, in which case the disk is said to be Plated (see
figs. 18, 19, p. 67). These nodules or plates are most commonly found in the
anal area about the base of, or on, the anal tube, or in the interprimibrachial areas,
112 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
or along the ambulacral grooves, especially toward the mouth. In a few genera
similar plates are developed in the brachial perisome between the inner ends of
the brachials.
The ambulacra of the arms and pinnules are often bordered by two rows of
small thin plates, the outer lying on the pinnules along the ventral edge of the
pinnulars, squarish or oblong, each usually with a notch at the distal proximal
corner for the reception of the sacculi, the inner, lying just within these and usually
in preserved specimens folded down so as completely to roof over the ambulacral
grooves, directed obliquely forward, rounded anteriorly, more or less pointed
posteriorly like a melon seed. The plates of the first or outer row are known as
Side plates, while those of the second or inner row are known as Covering plates
(see figs. 7, p. 63, and 55, p. 81). Covering plates occur alone in the Comasteride,
but in the other families the two rows are either both present, both rudimentary,
or both entirely absent.
These plates are similar in origin and significance to the concretions on the disk,
differing only in the greater regularity of size and shape. The two types are con-
nected by intermediate types bordering the ambulacra of the arms and of the
disk (see figs. 18, 19, p. 67).
It is interesting to note a close connection between the development of the side
and covering plates and the development of concretions upon the disk, for when
side and covering plates are present the disk is always more or less heavily plated,
and when side and covering plates are rudimentary or absent the disk is, with
rare exceptions, almost or quite without plates or visible concretions.
(8) Along either side of the free undivided arm is a row of slender and tapering
articulated processes, alternating in position, the Pinnules (see figs. 1,.p. 60, 2, p. 61,
3, p. 62, 45, p. 79, and 78, p. 131). When the division series consist of four
ossicles the second always bears a pinnule on the outer side (see fig. 81, p. 134);
pinnules are never found on the ossicles immediately succeeding axillaries (see
following paragraph) nor on the hypozygals of syzygial pairs (see below). The
first pinnule is always developed on the outer side of the second ossicle of the
arm or division series which bears it.
In the comasterid genera Capillaster and Nemaster curious exceptions to the
rule of pinnulation are found; the first and second division series are as usual,
but the third (II1Br) and subsequent division series are of three ossicles (the two
outer joined by syzygy) of which the first bears a pinnule; on all arms springing
undivided from the second division series (IIBr), or beyond, the first brachial bears
a pinnule on the outer side.
The first one to four or five pinnules on either side of the free undivided arm,
and all preceding pinnules, always differ from those succeeding in length and in
proportions; they usually lack the ambulacral groove, being*physiologically tactile
organs. In life they are bent over the disk instead of being laterally extended
like the others. These are known as Oral or Proximal pinnules (see figs. 1, p.
60, 6, p. 63, 83, p. 136, 85, p. 139, 104, p. 167, and 107, p. 173). They exhibit a
great amount of diversity in the different groups and hence furnish characters of
the greatest systematic value. In the Comasteride the oral pinnules are provided
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. aS
on the outer (rarely also on the inner) side of from three to thirty of their terminal
segments with long, thin, triangular processes, forming a peculiar and characteristic
terminal comb (see figs. 56-58, p. 83, 59, 60, p. 85, and 76, p. 129). These terminal
combs occasionally extend outward on the arm over the proximal genital pinnules,
or may even (in the genus Comaster) occur on some of the distal pinnules.
Following the oral pinnules there comes a row of usually shorter, but propor-
tionately stouter pinnules, which may be more or less expanded laterally; they
frequently lack the ambulacral grooves, though typically they are provided with
them. ‘These pimnules carry the genital products, and for that reason are known
as Genital pinnules (see figs. 1, p. 60, 6, 8, p. 63, 100, p. 162, 107, p. 173, and 113,
p- 181), though on account of their position in the arm they are often called Middle
pinnules.
Toward the end of the arm the pinnules gradually elongate (shortening only
in the family Tropiometridx) and become more slender, the gonad dwindling in
size and finally disappearing altogether; the long slender pinnules found beyond
the genital pinnules are known as Distal pinnules (see figs. 1, p. 60, 86, p. 141, 107,
p- 173, and 113, p. 181). The distal pinnules are always supplied with ambulacral
grooves, unless the ambulacra are absent from the entire arm upon which they are
borne, as is frequently the case with the posterior arms in many of the species of
Comasteride.
The articulations binding together the elements of the division series and the
brachials are of two types, each type having two subdivisions. The only articula-
tion of importance in systematic study and in identification is the Syzygy (see figs.
6, p. 63, and 30, 34, p. 71), a remarkably close ligamentous union of two adjacent
ossicles the articular faces of which are (in the comatulids) approximately flat and
marked with radiating ridges. Externally the syzygy is usually readily recognizable,
appearing as a very fine or dotted line traversing the arm exactly at right angles
to the longitudinal axis. The lower or proximal component of a syzygial pair
(that is two ossicles united by syzygy) is known as the Hypozygal, the upper or
distal as the Epizygal.
In the IIBr and following division series syzygies occur between the two outer
ossicles when these are three or four in number, but they are not always easy to
distinguish on account of the closeness of all the articulations.
Syzygies never occur between the two components of the first division series;
but here, as well as elsewhere in the division series and as far out on the arm as the
second brachial, an articulation called the Pseudosyzygy (see figs. 37—40, p. 75), and
another known as the Cryptosynarthry (see fig. 36, p. 75), are sometimes found
(in the Zygometridx, and in the genera Comatula and Comaster) which are exactly
like the syzygy in outward, and the first also very nearly so in internal, appearance.
They are, however, of very different origin.
In the comatulids there are several internal features which must be taken
into account in systematic work, and which therefore merit consideration here.
The digestive tube, which is long and tubular, usually makes one complete
coil between the central mouth and the submarginal anus (see fig. 20, p. 69);
but in the majority of the species of Comasteride it makes four coils, the anus
114 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
marking the center of the resulting spiral, and the mouth lying above the outer-
most coil (see fig. 21, p. 69).
The articulation by which the first post-radial ossicle is joined to the radial varies
greatly in the different groups (see figs. 9-11, p. 65, 31, p. 71, and 431, 432, p. 349).
The dorsal (outer) portion is occupied by a large, more or less semicircular or ellip-
soid depression, the Dorsal ligament fossa which is bounded ventrally (anteriorly) by
a strong Transverse ridge upon which as a fulcrum the motion of the articulation is
accommodated; this ridge is usually undifferentiated, but in one family it bears at
either end small triangular excavations known as Supplementary ligament fosse; just
within the center of this transverse ridge is a deep pit, ending blindly, known as
the Ligament pit; just ventral (distal) to the center of the transverse ridge is a
canal which passes directly into the radial; this canal lodges the axial nerve cord
of the dorsal nervous system, and is called the Central canal; it is sometimes, but
not always, surrounded by a raised rim; lying on either side of the central canal
are two shallow, usually triangular, but sometimes trapezoidal or even nearly
oblong or square, depressions with their bases lying along the transverse ridge
and their apices directed inward, the Interarticular ligament fosse; beyond these
are the deeper fosse, broadly rounded to narrowly linear, which accommodate the
muscles and are therefore called Muscular fosse; these are separated in the mid-
line either by a narrow ridge, the Intermuscular ridge, or by a groove, the Inter-
muscular groove; and their inner distal corners are rounded off so as to form a
more or less deep Intermuscular notch.
Within the radial pentagon, or the circlet formed by the radials in situ, there
is, in the oligophreate comatulids, a more or less dense secondary deposit of cal-
careous matter forming what is known as the Central plug (see fig. 11, p. 65).
The centrodorsal is more or less excavated internally so as to accommodate the
chambered organ and accessory structures; the size of this cavity is variable; it is
very large in the macrophreate species, so that in some cases the centrodorsal is
reduced to a mere shell, but it is small in the oligophreate species (see figs.
267-273, p. 259, oligophreate species, 286-291, p. 262, macrophreate species).
IDENTIFICATION OF RECENT COMATULIDS.
While the keys given for the determination of the genera and species of coma-
tulids are ample for rapid and correct identification, as is the case with other groups
a certain amount of familiarity with the animals is essential in order that the differ-
ential characters given in the keys may be appreciated in their true relative value;
much confusion may, however, be avoided if certain lines of procedure be followed
which, though as nearly as possible followed in the keys, are worthy of special
emphasis.
The first structures to be examined in the determination of an unknown coma-
tulid are the arms; if these do not divide at all, and the cirri are irregularly arranged
on a discoidal or low hemispherical centrodorsal, the specimen belongs either to the
Pentametrocrinide (5 or 10 arms) (figs. 113, 114, p. 181, 115-118, p. 183, 119,
p. 185, 120, p. 187, 121, p. 189, and 122, p. 191) or to the Zygometride (5 arms)
(figs. 83, p. 136, and 184, p. 235); if the cirri are in 10 columns on a long conical
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. wA5
centrodorsal the specimen belongs to the Atelecrinidx (fig. 227, p. 245); species
of the Pentametrocrinide have very long and slender arms, a large black sharply
stellate disk, a very evident synarthry between the first two post-radial ossicles, a
hemispherical centrodorsal bearing numerous slender, deciduous, long-jointed,
strongly flattened cirri, and very slender, rounded, or flattened pinnules, all of which
are approximately the same (figs. 113, p. 181, and 119, p. 185); species of the family
Zygometride have short and comparatively stout arms, a small, light colored, com-
pact, and rounded disk, apparently a syzygy (in reality a pseudosyzygy) between the
first two post-radial ossicles, a thin discoidal controdorsal bearing a single, or at most
a partially double, row of short, tenacious, rather stout, usually short-jointed but
only slightly flattened cirri, and stout prismatic lower pinnules, which are very
different from the slender distal pinnules (figs. 83, p. 136, and 84, p. 137).
If the arms divide, attention should be directed to the disk and oral pinnules;
if the latter have terminal combs (usually, but not always, ‘correlated with an
excentric mouth and a central or subcentral anal tube) the specimen belongs to the
Comasteride (figs. 25-28, p. 69, 56-58, p. 83, and 59, 60, p. 85).
If it should prove to possess a central mouth and smooth tipped oral pinnules,
then the type of articulation between the two elements of the first division series
should be determined; if they appear to be united by syzygy (in reality by a pseudo-
syzygy), the specimen belongs to a species of the family Zygometride (figs. 37—40,
. 75).
: If, however, they are not united by pseudosyzygy, then the pinnules should be
examined; if all the pinnules are strongly prismatic with their ambulacra bordered
by well-developed side and covering plates (figs. 7, p. 63, and 53-55, p. 81), the
families Thalassometride, Charitometride or Calometride are indicated. Species of
Calometride have the division series more or less separated from each other laterally
(never flattened against each other), a small globose disk entirely covered with a
firm calcareous plating, and comparatively slender, though very stiff, pinnules, of
which the earlier have the first two segments (especially the first) greatly enlarged;
the first pinnule, moreover, is always small and very weak, flexible and delicate,
so that the first two segments appear all out of proportion to the rest of the structure;
the cirri are always rather long, moderately stout, and are composed of usually short °
subequal segments, of which the distal bear dorsal processes (figs. 19, p. 67, and 89,
p. 147). Species of Charitometride have short, very stout, smooth cirri which
are composed of subequal segments, rather large pinnules, of which the first two
are longer than the succeeding, but more slender and composed of very much
more numerous and shorter segments, and the middle are more or less expanded
laterally to protect the genital glands; and a disk sunk well within the arm bases
and covered with more or less scattered calcareous nodules; the division series and
arm bases are strongly flattened against each other and form a closely compacted
base (figs. 55, p. 81, 99, p. 160, 100, p. 162, 101, 102, p. 163, and 369, 370,
p- 299). The disk and proximal arm structure of the species of Thalasso-
metride is essentially as in those of the Charitometride; but the cirri are long,
often excessively elongated, comparatively slender, with long segments proximally
and very short segments distally, the latter always bearing well-developed dorsal
116 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
processes; the genital pinnules are very rarely laterally expanded, and the first
pinnule differs from the succeeding, which it resembles in its general character, in
being greatly enlarged, with large stout segments, or, more rarely, reduced in size;
in the few genera in which the latter condition obtains the cirri are enormously
elongated (figs. 4, p. 63, 18, p. 67, 46, 49, 53, 54, p. 81, 98, p. 153, 94, p. 155, 95,
p. 157, 96, 97, p. 159, 361-362, p. 295, and 363-368, p. 297).
If the pinnules are neither prismatic nor provided with well-developed side
and covering plates, they should be examined to determine the proportionate length
of those in the middle and distal part of the arm; if the middle pinnules are notice-
ably longer than the distal, the cirri must be consulted; if these are short and stout
and composed of subequal squarish segments, the outer with two dorsal transverse
ridges (see fig. 353, p. 293), and if the first pinnule is longer and larger than the suc-
ceeding, the specimen belongs to the genus Oligometrides; but if the cirri, while stout,
are perfectly smooth dorsally, and the first pinnule is more slender than the one
succeeding, the family Tropiometride is indicated (see figs. 88, p. 145, and 356,
p. 293).
If the distai pinnules are longer than the middle pmnules, the possession of a
large and prominent conical centrodorsal bearing cirrus sockets in regular well
separated columns, each socket being surrounded ventrally (proximally) and
laterally by a high prominent more or less horseshoe-shaped rim, and of true basals
visible between the centrodorsal and the radials, as well as the entire absence of
pinnules from the proximal 10 or 11 brachials, denote the family Atelecrinide
(figs. 123, p. 192, 124, 125, p. 193, 218, 223, p. 243, 227, p. 245).
For the determination of the remaining families the arms offer perhaps the best
index; there may be 20 arms, arising from 10 radials, each post-radial series dividing
once; such a condition is only found in the Antedonide in the genus Promacho-
crinus; there may be 10 arms arising from 5 radials, each of the post-radial series
dividing once; or there may be more than 10 arms.
If there are more than 10 arms the second division series (IIBr series) may
consist of either two or four ossicles, in the latter case the two outer elements being
always united by syzygy.
If the IIBr series are 4(3+4) the specimen belongs to the Himerometride
(fig. 85, p. 139); if these are 2, it may belong to the Stephanometride,
the Mariametride, or the Colobometride; the species of Colobometrid which
have more than 10 arms are very easily differentiated from the multibrachiate
representatives of other families by their stout cirri which are composed of sub-
equal segments, those in the outer part bearing paired dorsal spines (see figs.
87, p. 143, and 345, p. 289); in the Stephanometride one or more of the proximal
pinnules is enlarged, greatly stiffened and spine-like, but composed of usually
less than 15 segments, most of which are elongated (see fig. 6, p. 63); the divi-
sion series also are rather widely separated, and each of their component ossicles
bears a ventrolateral process; in the Mariametride the division series are usually,
though not always, close together laterally, and may be laterally flattened; the
proximal pinnules, though sometimes more or less enlarged, are flagellate and are
composed of over 20 segments.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. LL
If there are only 10 arms, the possession of exceedingly short discoidal brachials
denotes the family Himerometridx (the genus Amphimetra) (see fig. 86, p. 141); the
presence of paired or tripled dorsal spines or of a broad transverse ridge on the
outer cirrus segments denotes the family Colobometride (see figs. 346-348, p- 289,
and 349-352, p. 291); while if none of these features are shown the specimen belongs
to the Antedonide.
This method of procedure for the determination of the various comatulid
groups is the most certain, though it is very unnatural in that it separates widely
genera belonging to the same family, and is based more or less upon characters
which, though very obvious and perfectly reliable, are systematically and morpho-
logically of but slight importance. A single family of comatulids may contain
species with from 5 to over 100 arms and therefore of radically different appearance,
though practically identical in fundamental structure, and it therefore becomes
necessary to handle the comatulid species in a somewhat arbitrary way unless we
wish to have recourse in each case to elaborate dissection in the determination of
the species.
The young of the comatulids are as yet very imperfectly known, and the
identification of specimens of multibrachiate species in the 10-armed stage is
involved in no little difficulty, especially where there is but little specific differentia-
tion in the oral pinnules as in the species of Comasteride. But in the echinoderms
the adult skeletal characters are as a rule assumed at an extraordinarily early
age, and the crinoids form no exception to this generalization. In the 10-armed
species the young usually resemble the adults sufficiently so that a close com-
parison, assisted by a judicious use of circumstantial evidence, is as a rule enough
to make the identification reasonably certain. In the young all the ossicles are
much elongated, the lower pinnules may be more or less deficient, the radials are
thin and broad, the basals may form a closed ring about the calyx as in the adult
Atelecrinus, while the cirri, arms, and pinnules have fewer segments, and those
more generalized and usually more elongated than those of the adults. The plating
of the disk may be highly developed at a very early age, as in the species of Calo-
metridx, in Comactinia and in Catoptometra; or in certain species in which it is well
developed in the adults it may be quite lacking in the young, as in some of the
Thalassometride. Side and covering plates, or the latter alone, are usually evident
at a very early age.
All young comatulids have the division series uniformly narrow and well
separated, no matter how broad they may become later in life, while the carination
of the brachials and the prismatic form of the pinnules characteristic of the adults of
many species is partially or wholly absent in their young.
Small specimens of the species of Pentametrocrinide and of the Comasteride,
possibly of other families as well, possess large oral plates which persist until com-
paratively late in life, together with large interradials. In the Comasteride the
young have the mouth and anal tube both subcentral; the mouth does not move
to an excentric position until a considerable size is reached; but the young of the
comasterids may always be differentiated from the young of species belonging to
other families by the combed oral pinnules.
118 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
The young of multibrachiate species with a very large number of arms are so
totally different from the adults, and so like the young of other species closely
related but with fewer arms, as to render their determination more or less a matter
of guesswork unless the characteristic pinnulation is developed. This appears to
occur at a very early stage, but in the Comasteride the pinnules of all the species
in each genus are remarkably similar, and even those of different genera vary but
little, so that I have usually been quite unable to determine, from the direct evidence
furnished by the examination of specimens, to what species, or even groups of species,
any given 10-armed young belongs. Comanthus pinguis, OC. japonica, C. solaster,
C. trichoptera and C. parvicirra are so distinct that typical examples could not
possibly be confused; yet there appear to be no characters by which their 10-armed
young may be differentiated.
The young of the species of Stephanometra in the 10-armed stage superficially
somewhat resemble certain species of Oligometra, being, furthermore, of about the
same size, and caution must be used in order to avoid confusing them, the per-
fectly smooth pinnules of the former being, however, sufficiently diagnostic as a
rule.
The young of the species of Ptilometra (figs. 90, 91, p. 149, 92, p. 151, and
adult, 93, p. 153), mainly through the absence of perisomic, side and covering
plates, and the rounded arms and pinnules, are more or less like the young of
certain antedonids; but the peculiar arrangement of the syzygies and the some-
what unusual stoutness, especially of the pinnules and of the cirri, are sufficient to
prevent confusion.
The arrangement of the syzygies, it may be remarked, is in certain cases one
of the most valuable aids in the identification of the young, though care must be
used in its employment as a differential character, as it is liable to very considerable
change after adolescent autotomy.
STRUCTURE AND ANATOMY.
HISTORY OF THE SUBJECT.
General history.
The study of the anatomy and physiology of the recent crinoids may be said
to have been begun with Adams, who, after a study of living specimens, in a short
note published in 1800 pointed out the existence of two apertures in the disk of
Antedon bifida, though he did not recognize them as the mouth and anus. This
observation of Adams did not attract the attention that it merited; in 1811
de Fréminville, in diagnosing his new genus Antedon (which included only one
species, A. gorgonia= A. bifida) mentioned that the mouth was central, and on the
lower side of the animal.
Péron in 1816, apparently basing his conclusions on Comatula solaris, says
“bouche inférieur, centrale, isolée, membraneuse, tubuleuse, saillante,”’ from which
it is clear that he mistook the anal tube for the mouth. Lamarck quoted Péron’s
notes on the structure of these animals in his monographic account of the group.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS, 119
J. S. Miller in 1821 described in considerable detail the skeletal structure of
Antedon bifida, of which he gives good figures, but he appears to have made the
same mistake as Péron in regard to the mouth.
In 1823 Leuckart, and also Meckel, correctly described the two openings of
the alimentary canal, their observations being independently confirmed by J. E.
Gray in 1826, in which year Heusinger published a more detailed discussion of the
same point.
In 1825 the Rev. Lansdown Guilding of St. Vincent called attention to the exist-
ence of peculiar articulations in the comatulids in which the joint faces are marked
with radiating lines, but he evidently supposed that all the brachial articulations
of the comatulids are of this type.
In 1832 Goldfuss studied in detail the calcareous structure both of Antedon
mediterranea and of Comanthus bennetti (‘ Comatula multiradiata’’), giving excellent
figures of each, in connection with his great work on the fossils of Germany.
In the following year Heusinger published his completed report upon the
anatomy of Antedon mediterranea, a report which, considering its early date, pos-
sesses very exceptional merit; and Leuckart contributed another memoir on the
same subject. Heusinger’s paper is accompanied by the first colored figures of
recent, crinoids ever published.
De Blainville’s account of Antedon in 1836 shows more or less ignorance of the
work of previous investigators. It had been a prevalent idea that the crinoids
grasped their prey with their arms, something after the manner of an octopus;
Lamarck believed this, but supposed that the food was conveyed to the mouth
by the action of the long oral pinnules, while de Blainville supposed that the actual
capture was performed by the tentacles bordering the ambulacral grooves. His
description of the skeleton is fairly good and, like his predecessors, he abandoned
the curious idea of Lamarck that the pinnules are really polyps comparable to those
of the umbellularians; but, in spite of the excellent monograph of Heusinger,
he described the stomach as a blind sac, and considered the anal tube to be more
or less the homologue of the siphon of the cephalopods, or a sort of ovarian
pouch. He was unable to find the ovaries; but they had been correctly placed
by J. V. Thompson (1835) in Antedon bifida and by Dujardin (1835) in Antedon
mediterranea while his memoir was in course of publication. Dujardin at the time
he described the position of the ovaries also proposed the theory that the tentacles
bordering the ambulacral grooves serve to pass the food along to the mouth, and
in addition, from an examination of the excreta, determined the fact that the food
of A. mediterranea consists of micro-organisms.
Prof. Johannes Miller, with his characteristic energy and thoroughness, now
took up the study of the crinoids, and between the years 1840 and 1849 published a
series of most excellent morphological and systematic treatises, dealing particularly
with the skeleton and the skeletal connectives, laying the basis for the systematic
study of the crinoids, especially of the comatulids. He was the first to describe
minutely a recent pentacrinite (Jsocrinus asteria).
Prof. Edward Forbes in 1841 described Antedon bifida in considerable detail,
but without much regard for the work of previous investigators; although the
120 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
ovaries had been correctly described six years previously both by J. V. Thompson
and by Dujardin, he identified as the ovaries the sacculi.
De Koninck and Le Hon, in their remarkable work upon the crinoids of the
Belgian carboniferous published in 1854, included some observations made by
Duchassaing at Guadeloupe on the structure of the disk of Jsocrinus decorus (erro-
neously identified as “‘Pentacrinus miilleri,” i. e., Endoxocrinus parre), and men-
tioned that the remains of small crustacea had been found in its stomach. This
is the first mention of the disk of a recent pentacrinite, the specimens heretofore
described having been devoid of “soft parts.”
In 1863 Prof. George Allman described in detail a single specimen of Antedon
bifida in the “prebrachial”’ or “‘cystid”’ stage which he had obtained on the coast
of South Devon, while two years later Prof. C. Wyville Thomson published his
exhaustive account of the development and larval anatomy of the same species;
this was followed in 1866 by Prof. William Benjamin Carpenter’s most excellent
memoir upon the later stages and upon the adult. In 1866 also Prof. Sven Lovén
described, in a comparative way, a peculiar comasterid, Phanogenia typica (Co-
master typica) in which the centrodorsal is without cirri and is reduced to a small
stellate plate lying in the center of the radial pentagon, a condition heretofore
unknown.
Two years later Prof. Michael Sars published his well-known memoir on Rhizo-
crinus lofotensis, to which he appended an exhaustive account of the pentacrinoid
young of Hathrometra sarsii; and Prof. Edmond Perrier took up the study of the
comatulids, particularly of Antedon bifida and A. moroccana, publishing in 1872
the first of a notable series of contributions which culminated in the later eighties
in a magnificent monograph treating in the greatest detail of the anatomy and
developmental history.
Prof. Elias Metschnikoff in 1871 published an interesting and instructive paper
upon certain points in the development of Antedon mediterranea, while Grimm in
1872 gave an account of the finer structure of the same species, and Baudelot con-
sidered the axial cords.
In 1876 there appeared a remarkable series of papers by Teuscher, Ludwig,
Semper, Gétte and the two Carpenters, dealing with various points in comatulid
anatomy, especially with the anatomy of the arms and with the early developmental
stages. P. H. Carpenter’s memoir on the brachial anatomy of crinoids dealt largely
with the species of Comasteridx, especially with Comanthus parvicirra, and was
prepared under the guidance of Professor Semper, being based upon material col-
lected by Semper himself in the Philippine archipelago. In this paper the first
mention is made of the curious modification often found in the posterior arm clus-
ters among the comasterids resulting in the loss of the ambulacral grooves, the
tentacles, and the subepithelial nerve band; and the occurrence is noted in the arm
of curious bodies, tentatively supposed to be sense organs, called spherodes. The
genital cord is found also to give rise to eggs within the arm itself instead of only
within the pinnules as in Antedon, an observation later found to be equally appli-
cable to the pentacrinites.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS, DOT
In the following year Prof. Hubert Ludwig, whose four papers published in
1876 had constituted a notable contribution to the study of the anatomy of the
comatulids, and of Rhizocrinus, completed his investigations and laid before the
scientific world an exhaustive account of the whole subject, in which many points
over which there had for years been controversy were permanently settled. At
the same time P. H. Carpenter published a preliminary notice of his important mono-
graph on the genus <Actinometra (now known as the family Comasteride), which
was published in its final form two years later.
In 1878 P. H. Carpenter published a contribution to the knowledge of the oral
and apical systems of the echinoderms, a line of work which subsequently called
forth many more or less similar papers from his pen. In 1879 there appeared
another memoir on the same subject, a short account of the nervous system, a
discussion of the terminology of the parts of the crinoid calyx, and the above men-
tioned masterly and very comprehensive treatise on the genus Actinometra all by
the same author.
In 1880, 1881 and 1882 Carpenter published a number of papers dealing with
various points in the anatomy, especially the minute anatomy, of recent forms,
with the homologies of the apical system, the comparative structure of recent and
fossil comatulids and of the endocyclic and exocyclic recent species, and with various
other points. In 1881 he announced the interesting discovery of true basals in a
recent type of comatulid, which he therefore considered worthy of generic rank, and
called Atelecrinus.
In 1883 he discussed the anatomical relations of the vascular system of the
echinoderms, supporting the conclusions reached by Ludwig and by his father, and
dissenting from those attained by Perrier, Koehler and Apostolides.
Early in 1884 his memoir on the remarkable Thawmatocrinus (recently found
to be but the young of a form described under another name) exhibiting numerous
primitive characters, appeared. In the same year he published a discussion of
certain points in the anatomy of larval comatulids, and an account of the apical
plates of the ophiuroids, while his father, as well as Prof. A. M. Marshall and Dr.
Carl F. Jikeli furnished important contributions to the study of the nervous system,
especially from the physiological point of view, all three having conducted experi-
ments upon the living animals, W. B. Carpenter on Antedon bifida, and Marshall
and Jikeli on A. mediterranea. But the year 1884 is chiefly notable for the appear-
ance of the Challenger monograph on the stalked erinoids, by P. H. Carpenter. In
this monograph all phases of the subject are treated, and the comatulids are
exhaustively considered in regard to their structure, morphology and homologies, in
the body of the work, and especially in the several appendices.
The year 1885 witnessed the appearance of part three of Wachsmuth and
Springer’s revision of the so-called Palxocrinoidea, in which the recent crinoids
come in for a large amount of instructive discussion. In this year Carpenter con-
tributed four papers, all dealing more or less extensively with the morphology of
the recent crinoids, and Perrier three, dealing mainly with the organization of the
young.
79146°—Bull. 82—15——9
122 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
In the year 1886 Dr. Jules Barrois gave a preliminary account of his studies
on the young of Antedon mediterranea, his complete monograph on the subject
appearing two years later; P. H. Carpenter published three papers, all more or less
important from a morphological point of view, the most noteworthy being one on
the variations in the cirri of certain European comatulids; Wachsmuth and Springer
completed section two of part three of their work; Dr. Arthur Dendy gave an excel-
lent detailed account of the regeneration of the visceral mass in Antedon, and a
description of a curious 12-armed specimen of A. bifida; and Perrier published the
first part of his elaborate monograph on the structure and development of the
same species and A. moroccana.
Mr. H. Bury in the following year gave a short sketch of the results he had
attained in the study of the early stages of Antedon mediterranea, the most important
being the discovery of the infrabasals, which had hitherto been unknown in the
comatulids, confirming in a most remarkable way the prediction of Wachsmuth
and Springer, who had announced their probable existence upon evidence deduced
from the fossil crinoids. Bury’s completed memoir appeared in 1888, a few months
after that of Barrois. At the same time Wachsmuth and Springer published a
critical account of the apical plates in blastoids, crinoids and cystids, discussing
the views advanced by Etheridge and Carpenter in their monograph on the blastoids
(1886); Mr. M. M. Hartog proposed the theory that the madreporic system of the
echinoderms is in reality a left nephridium discharging a current outward by means
of cilia; Vogt and Yung suggested that the sacculi are in reality symbiotic alge;
and Carpenter continued his contributions on echinoderm morphology, including
some rather sharp criticisms of the work of Perrier and of Vogt and Yung.
The year 1888 was especially notable in the history of the structure and develop-
ment of the comatulids, for it witnessed the completion of three important mono-
graphs, and the entry of a new worker into the field of echinoderm morpholog
who was destined subsequently to play a leading part. Bury and Barrois each
completed their memoirs on the young stages of Antedon mediterranea; both entered
into much greater detail than had ever been attempted before, working along the
most modern lines, and their results showed an agreement in most particulars which is
indicative of the careful and painstaking way in which the work was carried on by
each. Dr. Otto Hamann announced in a preliminary paper some of the results of
his studies on the morphology of the crinoids, in which he supported the views of
the two Carpenters and Marshall, but took exception to many of those of Vogt,
Perrier and Jikeli. Wachsmuth and Springer brought out their most important
discovery of the ventral structure of Tazocrinus, showing that the palwozoic Flexi-
bilia had an open mouth like the recent crinoids; this was followed later (1890),
as a logical sequence, by their paper on the perisomic plates of the crinoids, which
led to the conclusion that the Paleocrinoidea and Neocrinoidea, as natural divisions
of the crinoids, are untenable.
Systematically the great event of the year was the completion by P. H. Carpen-
ter of the Challenger volume on the comatulids, this constituting a fairly complete
epitome of all the knowledge on the subject, except in regard to such points as
had been exhaustively treated in the monograph on the stalked crinoids, and
id
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 123
these points are largely morphological. Carpenter also contributed a paper on
crinoids and blastoids.
The year 1889 saw the completion of Hamann’s work on the anatomy of the
crinoids; his very important memoir enters into the most minute histological
detail, and is concluded by a summary of the results of his studies on the com-
parative morphology of the echinoderms, a discussion of echinoderm phylogeny,
and a critical survey of the work of previous authors. In the same year Carpenter
contributed a list of the crinoids of the Mergui Archipelago in which a few mor-
phological points are discussed; Perrier continued his monograph on the structure
and development of Antedon bifida and A. moroccana; and Dr. F. A. Bather first
entered the field of crinoid morphology, publishing five papers dealing with fossil
species, but including consideration of recent forms. Bury’s treatise on the com-
parative embryology of the echinoderms, which appeared at this time, is one of
the most instructive and interesting contributions to the subject ever made.
In the following year Carpenter continued his valuable contributions, especially
discussing the morphological terminology; Ludwig commented adversely upon
Hartog’s views in regard to the function of the madreporic plate and the stone
canal in the echinoderms; and Dr. L. Cuénot discussed in an admirable paper
the aboral (dorsal) nervous system, in another paper commenting adversely on
Hartog’s theories; and Wachsmuth and Springer gave a detailed account of the
perisomic plates in the crinoids.
In 1891 four papers appeared from Carpenter’s pen, the most important dealing
primarily with certain points in the morphology of the cystids; and Bather pub-
lished five articles in which more or less was said in regard to the structure of the
recent forms. Dr. O. Jaekel discussed the calyx plates, and Cuénot continued
his interesting work on the morphology of the ‘‘soft parts.”
Dr. Oswald Seeliger’s memoir on the development of Antedon adriatica was the
great work of 1892; in it he reviews critically the writings of Sir C. Wyville Thomson
on Antedon bifida, and of Bury and Barrois on Antedon mediterranea; he confirms
Bury’s discovery of infrabasals, but finds them to be somewhat differently arranged
in Antedon adriatica, and four or five in number instead of usually three.
The work of the succeeding years has been almost wholly directed toward a
more exact knowledge of structural details, of various physiological, developmental
and regenerative processes, of spermatogenesis and odégenesis, and of kindred
subjects, and no monographs of general scope, morphological or systematic, have
appeared. Cuénot, Bather, Wachsmuth and Springer, Jaekel, Perrier, Walther
and de Loriol have steadily continued to enrich the literature with valuable memoirs,
of which Wachsmuth and Springer’s magnificent monograph on the American
Crinoidea Camerata, published by Springer after Wachsmuth’s death, Bather’s
treatise on the crinoids in Lankester’s Zoology, the monographs on Uintacrinus,
and on the structure of Onychocrinus, by Springer, and the various papers by
Cuénot, are of the most interest to the student of the recent crinoids. Of the
papers of less general scope special mention must be made of those on regeneration
by Minckert, Przibram, Riggenbach and Morgan; on genital structures, odgenesis
and spermatogenesis by Danielssen, Field, W. Marshall, Créty and Russo; on inter-
124 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
articular connectives by Bosshard; on perisomic spicules by Woodland; on perisomic
plates by Keyes; on the intestinal tract by Frenzel; on glandular organs by Reich-
ensperger; on the metamorphoses by Bury; on hybrids with other echinoderms
by Godlewski; on fossil comatulids by de Loriol; on the sense of smell and taste
by Nagel; and on the plates bordering the ambulacra in Heliometra and Hathrometra
by Mortensen. The more general works of Zittel, Jaekel, and especially of Haeckel,
call for separate notice.
General survey of the history.
The year 1835 witnessed the inception of careful investigation mto the develop-
mental history of the comatulids, while the first serious attempt to elucidate their
structure and anatomy was made in 1829. Work along both lines was carried on
more or less intermittently, under the great handicap of a limited knowledge of
technique and inadequate instruments, until the early sixties, when the labors of
Professors Allman, Sir C. Wyville Thomson and W. B. Carpenter at once advanced
it to a much higher plane than it-ever occupied before, and gave it an entirely new
aspect.
The years 1876—’77, a little over a decade later, again marked the inception of
a new epoch and gave to the study a stimulus which has persisted until the present
day. It is interesting to observe that this epoch was ushered in mainly by the
initial work of young men, and not only was it thereby endowed from the start
with a certain quality of originality and forcefulness, but interest in it was kept
alive by the continued labors of these individuals and by the advice which they
gave and the example which they set to others.
The study of the fossil erinoids, especially those of America, at the same time
began to assume a new aspect, the same period which witnessed the first applica-
tion of the present methods to the study of the development and anatomy of the
recent forms ushering in for them also consideration and treatment along the
lines followed at the present day.
Mr. Charles Wachsmuth and Mr. Frank Springer had commenced their system-
atic researches together, and these authors, by their joint work on the so-called
Paleocrinoidea, and by many subsequent contributions, did for the fossil crinoids
what the investigators on the other side of the Atlantic were doing for the recent
species. Not only that, but they worked side by side with the two Carpenters,
especially the son, and this mutual codperation has been of the greatest benefit in
bringing out many of the steps by which different results were attained. They
were the first definitely to insist that the fossil crinoids could not be adequately
understood without a comparative study of the existing forms.
It was of course to be expected that a student of recent species would view their
fossil representatives in a somewhat different light from that in which they appeared
to a paleontologist. History has shown that too often fossils have been ignored
by workers on recent forms, and recent forms ignored or slighted by paleontolo-
gists, to whom the study of the more minute details presented by them has appeared
irksome and even useless; the students of the crinoids are therefore peculiarly for-
tunate in that the one to whom we are indebted for the great bulk of our knowl-
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 125
edge of the recent forms should have been able to appeal personally to masters
of the paleontological side of the subject.
The most striking feature of the history of the study of the structure and devel-
opment of the comatulids is that the work has been practically confined to species
of the genus Antedon, and has mostly been done on A. mediterranea. Hamann, P. H.
Carpenter, Ludwig, Semper, Danielssen and Perrier include more or less discus-
sion of a few other forms, usually Heliometra glacialis or Comanthus parvicirra; a
little is to be found concerning Neocomatella alata, Tropiometra carinata and T. picta,
and Leptometra phalangium, and on the pentacrinoid young of Hathrometra, with
short notices on the pentacrinoids of certain other species, especially of Leptometra
phalangium and Heliometra glacialis. But even a beginning has scarcely been made
in the study of the comparative anatomy of the comatulids, while we know nothing
whatever in regard to the comparative development, except in the case of three of the
species of Antedon, the observations on one of which were made as far back as 1863
and have never been reviewed.
ORGANIZATION OF THE CRINOIDS.
General remarks.
Before taking up in detail the description of the various structures and organs
which collectively make up the crinoid whole, it is necessary to give a brief account
of what, in the opinion of the author, a crinoid is, and to indicate in as few words
as possible the relationship between the crinoids and other organisms, both within
and without the phylum Echinodermata.
Within a very few years it has been suggested by two investigators, working
quite independently, that the echinoderms are not by any means the highly anoma-
lous creatures that they have heretofore always been considered, but that they are
in reality a very aberrant offshoot from the acraniate crustacean stock, finding
their logical systematic position beyond the barnacles.
The present author was led to this conclusion through a careful study of the
adult crinoidal nervous system which, though highly complicated and very anoma-
lous, is seen when analyzed to belong to the type especially characteristic of prim-
itive crustaceans, while Prof. William Patten arrived at the same result through
a critical comparative study of the development of the echinoderms and of the
primitive crustaceans, and a study of the abnormal young of the latter.
Of the echinoderms as a whole, Prof. Patten writes: ‘‘The echinoderms are
notable for their contrasts and contradictions. Their outward appearance and
their pronounced radial structure distinguish them from all other animals, and at
first sight suggest a very primitive organization similar to that of the ccelenterates.
On the other hand, they display a high degree of histological and anatomical special-
ization that is in marked contrast with their low grade of organic efficiency. They
begin their early embryonic development with a bilaterally symmetrical body and
with clear indications of metamerism, only to change it in the later stages for one
that is radially symmetrical and in which all outward traces of metamerism have
disappeared. After a short free swimming larval existence they attach themselves,
126 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
neural side down, by means of larval appendages and a cephalic outgrowth; they
then turn neural side up and remain so attached for life; or in some cases they give
up their sessile existence and again become free, moving slowly about, neural side
down. There are, therefore, three chief characteristics of the echinoderms that
demand our first consideration: (1) The early bilateral symmetry and metamerism;
(2) the sessile life and mode of attachment by cephalic outgrowths; and (3) the
asymmetry. There appears to be but one explanation for these remarkable condi-
tions, which is as follows: The early development of bilateral symmetry and metam-
erism in the echinoderms, and the presence of a telocele and telopore in place of
the more primitive gastrula and blastopore, clearly indicate that they had their
origin in bilaterally symmetrical animals of the acraniate type that had already
acquired a considerable degree of complexity. These ancestral forms probably
belonged to the cirriped group, for before the latent asymmetry becomes effective
the young echinoderm larva resembles a cirriped in its form, mode of attachment,
and subsequent metamorphosis more than it does any other animal. The radiate
structure of the later stages was due to a persistent local defect, or to the absence
of a definite part of the embryonic formative material, which in turn created a con-
dition of unstable equilibrium, the result of which is that the whole side, following
the path of least resistance, bends toward the defective area, forming an arch that
increases in curvature until an approximate equilibrium is again attained by the
union of its two ends to form a circle. The original half metameres and segmental
organs are then arranged in radiating lines, thus creating a new radiate type and
a new set of internal conditions that dominate the future growth of the organism.
If we assume that a strongly marked asymmetry, such as that which occurs so fre-
quently as an abnormality in Xiphosura, or even as a normal character in the
Bopyride and Paguride, was a fixed feature of the hypothetical ancestral cirripeds
and was capable of a successful organic adjustment, we shall have a perfectly
simple and natural explanation of the origin and structure of the echinoderms.”
“The young asteroid larva is said to attach itself voluntarily at first, and for a
short time only; later it becomes permanently attached, head first and neural side
down, in the same remarkable manner as a young cirriped, both the cephalic
appendages (which are thick walled and muscular, with a long basal portion and a
short terminal knob studded with small adhesive papille, greatly resembling the
minute adhesive antenne of the cirripeds and parasitic crustaceans) and the adhesive
disk taking part in the process. The young crinoid larva attaches itself wholly
by means of the cephalic disk, as the adhesive appendages appear to be absent.
Its first position is with the neural or oral surface down, as in the cypress stage of
the cirriped. The disk then elongates, forming a slender cephalic stalk or peduncle,
and the larva turns a somersault, bringing its neural side uppermost. Meanwhile
the vestibule, or peribranchial chamber, which at first is small and temporarily closed,
enlarges, then ruptures, and the five appendages project from the cuplike head in
typical cirriped fashion. In certain of the representatives of the recent echinoderms,
such as the asteroids, the fixed stage is temporary, while in certain others, such as
the echinoids and holothurians, it appears to be omitted altogether and the young
echinoderm, after its metamorphosis, again acquires a limited power of locomotion.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. LO
Fia. 73.
Fie. 71.
A
C
a
Fie. 74.
Fics. 69-74.—69, PERFORATED PLATES FROM THE SKIN OF CAUDINA PLANAPETURA, SHOWING A CLOSE APPROXIMATION TO THE
PRIMITIVE TYPE OF ECHINODERMAL CALCIFICATION (AFTER H. L. CLARK). 70, A PERFORATED PLATE FROM THE SKIN OF CAv-
DINA CALIFORNICA, SHOWING INCIPIENT CALCAREOUS RODS (AFTER H. L. CLARK). 71, THE APICAL SYSTEM OF A YOUNG
SPECIMEN OF EUROCIDARIS NUTRIX FROM THE ANTARCTIC, SHOWING THE PRIMITIVE CENTRAL PLATE SURROUNDED BY FIVE
GENITALS (CORRESPONDING TO THE CRINOID BASALS), BEYOND WHICH ARE FIVE OCULARS (CORRESPONDING TO THE CRINOID
INFRABASALS). 72, THE APICAL SYSTEM OF A SPECIMEN OF LYTECHINUS VARIEGATUS FROM FLORIDA, SHOWING THE CENTRAL
PLATE RESOLVED INTO NUMEROUS SMALL PLATES AND SURROUNDED BY FIVE GENITALS (CORRESPONDING TO THE CRINOID
BASALS), BEYOND WHICH ARE FIVE OCULARS (CORRESPONDING TO THE CRINOID INFRABASALS), THE TWO POSTERIOR REACHING
THE PERIPROCTAL AREA BETWEEN THE GENITALS; THE MADREPORIC PORES ARE NOT CONFINED TO THE RIGHT ANTERIOR
GENITAL, BUT OCCUR ALSO ON THE TWO ADJACENT OCULARS. 73, THE APICAL SYSTEM OF A SPECIMEN OF ARBACIA STELLATA
FROM MARGARITA ISLAND, LOWER CALIFORNIA, SHOWING THE CENTRAL PLATE DIVIDED INTO FOUR, AND THE RIGHT ANTERIOR
GENITAL, ORDINARILY A MADREPORIC PLATE, RESOLVED INTO NUMEROUS SMALL PLATES. 74, DIAGRAMS ILLUSTRATING THE
PROGRESSIVE CHANGES DURING GROWTH IN THE RELATIONSHIPS OF THE ELEMENTS OF THE CALYX, AND IN THE RELATION-
SHIP BETWEEN THE CALYX AND THE VISCERAL MASS OF A COMATULID; THE EXTREME ATTAINED BY THE ADULT PENTACRINITE
IS REPRESENTED BY FE; THE PLATES SHOWN ARE THE BASALS, THE RADIALS, AND THE ORALS,
128 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
But in most primitive echinoderms, such as the stalked crinoids, blastoids, and
cystideans, a permanent attachment by an elongated cephalic stalk, in typical
cirriped fashion, was the almost invariable rule, and no doubt represented the
primitive condition for the whole class. When an echinoderm does become free
it acquires only a very limited power of locomotion and of coérdinated movement.
Its characteristic lack of efficiency in this respect is due not so much to its simple
or primitive structure as to the fact that its freedom was gained at a late period in
the phylogeny of a very ancient group in which sessile inaction was the prevailing
condition. It is often assumed that a sessile or parasitic mode of life is the initial
cause of degeneration. The various anatomical peculiarities common to the cope-
pods, cirripeds, and acraniates do not bear out this conclusion. The fact that in
these diverse subphyla we see the same shifting of cephalic appendages to the
hzemal side, the same cephalic outgrowths, and the same degeneration of the neu-
romuscular organs, indicates that there
are certain initial defects or peculiarities
of germinal material common to the whole
group, and that these are the underlying
cause of defective organization, the defec-
tive organization being in every case of
such a nature that a sessile or parasitic or
vegetative mode of life is the only one
possible.”’
Professor Patten doubts very much
whether it will ever be possible to make
precise or detailed comparisons of any
value between relatively modern types of
arthropods, like the decapods and insects,
Fic. 75.—A SPECIMEN OF HETEROMETRA REYNAUDII .and the echinoderms. My attention was
FROM CEYLON ONLY PARTIALLY CALCIFIED; (a) THE directed toward a comparison of the adults
BAe emai, Anp (0) A SINGLE ARM FROM THE of the two groups on account of the high
degree of specialization of the echinoderm
larve, and the difficulty of bringing into satisfactory correlation the data offered
by the very diverse young of the different echinoderm classes.
While it certainly is not possible to indicate any such close agreement between
the adults of crustaceans and echinoderms as has been shown by Prof. Patten to
exist in the case of the young, it appears to me that a description of an echinoderm
in terms of a crustacean, and a description of a crinoid in terms of other echinoderms,
in the manner in which I originally worked them out, will prove to be not without
interest.
The points of correspondence between the adult crustaceans and the adult echi-
noderms as indicated in the following pages are only to a very limited degree capable
of logical and connected proof as true homologies; collectively they form the base
for the construction of a working hypothesis through the adoption of which very
many problems in the comparative morphology of the echinoderms are logically
129
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS.
>
D
2
2
Re eae eae
Seca,
ae
v
I>
» SHOWING THE RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF
Fia. 76.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF COMACTINIA ECHINOPTERA FROM CUBA
THE ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL, AND CIRRI.
130 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
and intelligibly explained that can not be explained in any other way. No one of
the comparisons is in itself at all conclusive, while in one or two cases a comparison
between the echinoderms and the annelids is almost as justifiable as between the
echinoderms and crustaceans; but the sum total of the comparisons indicates that
Fic. 77.—DORSAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULELLA BRACHIOLATA FROM AUSTRALIA, SHOWING THE RELATIVE PROPOR-
TIONS OF THE ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL AND CIRRI (RECONSTRUCTED FROM THE TYPE-SPECIMENS OF ALECTO ROSEA
J. MULLER).
there is between the echinoderms and the crustaceans a similarity of fundamental
structure which can not but be more than accidental.
At first sight it may seem unwarranted to suggest, even remotely, a comparison
between such highly diverse and relatively recent animals as the echinoderms and
the crabs of the present day. Yet in the two groups we have to do with types
which are in a way convergent. Both the echinoderms and the crabs are ultimately
eee
piel
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 131
derived from the same stock, though along radically different lines. Practically
the entire body of the crab is compressed within the enormously enlarged and rigid
cephalothorax, which is commonly broader than long. Locomotion, instead of
being chiefly or entirely in the direction of the longitudinal axis of the body as in
other bilaterally symmetrical animals, is in any direction, but most commonly at
f
}
y
b
Hy
D
¥
p
LN
Sette
OO
Z
a= (I
,
s
x
XN
‘
x
ETHERIDGE! FROM THE Aru ISLANDS, SHOWING THE INNER OR INTERNAL
Fg. 78.—DORSAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF CoMATULA
R EXTERNAL (SHORTER) ARMS.
(LONGER) ARMS DIFFERENTIATED FROM THE OUTER O
right angles to this axis; roughly it may be said to be best developed in the direc-
tion of the longer axis of the cephalothorax in any given type. The number of
fully developed metameres within the cephalothorax is always five. Asymmetry
of the anterior ambulatory appendages or of the abdomen or of both is the rule
among the crabs. In the echinoderms the entire body (except for the appendages
in the crinoids) is enclosed within a typically heavily calcified and closely knit test
132 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
and in outline is circular or stellate. Locomotion is in any direction, except in
certain highly specialized types. The number of metameres is always five. Asym-
metry has affected the whole body so that one-half has become entirely atrophied
and the remaining halves of the five metameres have curved about and, the an-
terior and posterior ends joining, have formed a radially symmetrical body.
Eggs and segmentation.
In most crustaceans the egg is enclosed in a tough chitinous membrane, and
the development is of the so-called centrolecithal or peripheral type; but within the
group complete and equal division of the ovum similar to that of the annelids also
occurs, and all intermediate types are
found. In the echinoderms total seg-
mentation ordinarily occurs; but in the
crinoids the egg is enclosed in a tough
membrane resembling that in which the
egg of most crustaceans is enveloped, at
the same time being attached to the pin-
nules of the mother in the same way
that the egg of many crustaceans is at-
tached to the abdominal appendages of
the mother, and in Antedon adriatica
(the only species except the closely
allied Antedon mediterranea in which the
early developmental stages are ade-
quately understood) where there is a
relatively large amount of yolk we find
more than a hint of the centrolecithal
development so characteristic of the
arthropods.
(S
esx)
y) FRE”)
a .
Bm
oy XY
WF ao.
Development of the larve.
Fic. 79.—DORSAL VIEW OF THE TYPE-SPECIMEN OF COMA- ‘ 7
TULA PURPUREA FROM AUSTRALIA, SHOWING THE CIRRI The quotation from Professor Patten
CONFINED TO THE INTERRADIAL ANGLES OF THE CENTRO- preceding clearly indicates the very
ee close correspondence between the de-
velopment of the larve of the echinoderms and that of the larve of certain types
of crustaceans. It is sufficient here to note the fact that the larve of the echino-
derms in their development pass through a striking metamorphosis, accompanied
by a remarkable histolysis, and a more or less pronounced metamorphosis which is
exactly comparable to it except for the absence of any change in the symmetry,
and a similar histolysis, occur in most arthropods.
Echinodermal skeleton.
The singularly specialized skeletal system of the echinoderms, though very
diverse in its manifestations, presents when analyzed a certain uniformity of
character throughout the phylum; taken as whole, it is of a somewhat different
nature from that of any other group of animals.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 133
Originally the echinodermal skeleton consisted merely of scattered calcareous
deposits in the mesoderm, chiefly in the body wall, probably in the shape of spicules
and small plates comparable to the less specialized types of spicules and plates
found in certain holothurians (fig. 69, p. 127; compare figs. 543, pl. 4, and 569-571,
pl. 7) and in localized situations in species belonging to all the other groups, and
Fic. 80.—DORSAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULIDES DECAMEROS FROM SOUTHWESTERN JAPAN, SHOWING THE RELATIVE
PROPORTIONS OF THE ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL AND CIRRI.
later of more or less fenestrated plates comparable to the so-called perforated
plates occurring in the Molpadiide (fig. 70, p. 127). :
Fusion of spicules, and of spicules and plates, then occurred whereby the diverse
original elements were united into large skeletal units, each with a definite form
within constantly narrowing limits.
134 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Spicules and plates of what is probably the primitive type persist in many of the
holothurians, and are developed in certain situations in species of all the other
classes, in the crinoids making up the visceral, and most of the perisomic, skeleton.
MT
NTA
TN
Hn DOAN
7
=
4
{4
Fay
SARIS
KAIAY
|
k
>
Zh
i
L
>
Fig. 81,—DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRAL STRUCTURES AND OF A SINGLE POST-RADIAL SERIES OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS
SOLASTER FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN, SHOWING THE RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF THE VARIOUS PARTS.
These spicules are in general suggestive of the spicules of certain sponges and
aleyonarians, both in form and in origin, and it is in the skeletons of these animals
that the skeleton of the echinoderms, though entirely independent in origin, finds
its nearest counterpart.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 135
In the crustacean cuticle we find, in connection with the chitin, more or less
extensive deposits of calcium carbonate, and it is of this substance that the skeletons,
originally and at first solely external, of the echinoderms are composed. Although
the skeleton of the echinoderms as we know them to-day in a broad morphological
way most nearly resembles the skeleton of certain sponges and aleyonarians, the
ultimate origin of the echinodermal skeleton, as shown by the reduction of the
Cay
Z]
Yi
N
Fic. 82.—DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRAL STRUCTURES AND OF A SINGLE POST-RADIAL SERIES OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS
ANNULATA FROM TORRES STRAITS, SHOWING THE RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF THE VARIOUS PARTS.
echinodermal skeleton to the lowest possible terms, was radically different from the
ultimate origin of the skeleton in these groups. At first the echinodermal skeleton
was a purely superficial body covering consisting of minute calcareous elements,
strictly homologous with, and exactly resembling, the calcified portion of the dermal
investment of the crustaceans. Coincident with the evolution of the radially sym-
metrical echinoderms from the bilateral primitive crustacean stock was the assump-
BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
136
tion by the echinoderms of the sessile habit; and the assumption of the sessile
habit went hand in hand with the modification of the skeleton in the direction of
the type common to similarly inactive forms, such as sponges and aleyonarians.
f f f
fl f f { 5 e
qf ff by 7
<r 8 f j f b He
<SLad fff ! Pb ve
Crd f H A 4 H KY 4 a
Sad tf a
OA RH Ht fy {
S 4 th f}
SH Boy fs f
SABER |
<A ASE |
COA ARS
EY
hy
a Sy
oS ~
ca at
/ gp
gL
Fic. 83.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF EUDIOCRINUS JUNCEUS FROM THE LESSER SUNDA ISLANDS, SHOWING THE
RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF THE ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL, AND CIRRI.
Thus, as we understand it, the echinoderm skeleton considered strictly as the
echinoderm skeleton was from the first a skeleton of the spicular type, the counter-
part of the skeleton of certain sponges and alcyonarians; but in reality this spicular
echinodermal skeleton is not an original development like the spicular skeleton of
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. VSa
the aleyonarians, but a spicular skeleton suddenly grafted upon a diffusely calcified
dermal investment of the most primitive crustacean type.
PN ZN LN RINT STIS SISSIES 2
ETM
we
fr
3
O)
ri
tA
ct
a
es
rt
ry
r)
s
YX FS
SS
<7} ‘}
SF
()
Q
<
D>
>
ri?
6a
S
OCRINUS PINNATUS FROM THE LESSER SUNDA ISLANDS, SHOWING THE
Fig. 84—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF EUDI
RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF THE ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL, AND CIRRI.
ans the body wall appears possibly to have been
s not seem to differ in any way from the body
d with them; but in the great
In certain of the early cystide
more or less chitinous; at least it doe
wall of the crustaceans which are found associate
79146°—Bull. 82—15——10
138 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
majority of the cystideans, and in such holothurians as the species of the family
Psolide, these primitive plates and spicules, at first serving merely to stiffen and to
protect the body wall, in the course of phylogenetic development gradually became
gathered together into groups more or less definite in position, the grouping origi-
nally being contingent upon mechanical considerations resulting from the localizing
effect of the movements of the body wall, especially of the anterior portion.
Such a grouping and fusing of spicules to form a definite skeleton is not with-
out a parallel in other invertebrate classes. In the Tubipora, or organ pipe corals,
the tubular skeleton, with its transverse platforms, is the result of a fusion of spic-
ules, and the remarkably solid axial skeleton of the red corals has the same
origin. It is only among the echinoderms, however, that a spicular skeleton
develops into a solid external armament or into a series of articulated braces.
Skeletons of the spicule forming type are found only among permanently fixed
or more or less strictly sedentary animals, though sedentary animals do not all
possess them; their existence appears to be entirely incompatible with muscular
activity. We thus have an excellent clue to the habits of the earliest echinoderms,
and especially of the earliest crinoids, as it is in this class that the densest skeleton
is found.
The sponge or aleyonarian-like skeleton of the echinoderms is undoubtedly of
independent origin within the group, without further phylogenetical significance;
also it is probably a feature of the adult organism only, without a counterpart in
the larva. It does not appear before the assumption of the radial symmetry, and
was probably phylogenetically, as it is ontogenetically, coincident with it.
In the cystideans and in the plated holothurians, such as the species included
in the family Psolide, the body skeleton is formed directly by a simple process of
segregation and development of the spicules in the body wall, governed purely by
mechanical considerations; but this is not the case in the echinoids or in the crinoids.
In these classes the ultimate origin of the plates is exactly the same, but the place
of origin of all the plates is always about the anterior end of the digestive tube,
from which position they have traveled posteriorly, so that they now surround the
opposite apex of the body, their paths along the body wall being marked by a trail
of reduplications of themselves left in the line of passage.
In the holothurians the fortuitousness of the primitive spicule forming type
of skeleton is seen in an extreme development; for in the species of this class no
calcareous matter at all may be deposited, as in Pelagothuria, there may be scattered
spicules of the most primitive type, there may be highly specialized spicules, or
there may be very definite plates.
In the holothurians the dermal skeleton is merely a mass of diffuse spicules,
not segregated into plates; in other words, of the ancestral type for the echinoderms.
In the echinoids definite plates are present, almost entirely enclosing the body; but
these plates are extremely primitive in character; they are differentiated in each
radial division into a central series, composed of a varying number of similar col-
umns (interambulacrals), and bordering series of which there is usually a single
row on either side of the central series.
139
3 CRINOIDS.
EXISTING
MONOGRAPH OF THE
SeATAVAAVAULOLULOAUAUAW
nL
CIRRA FROM SINGAPORE, SHOWING THE RELATIVE
A YOUNG SPECIMEN OF CRASPEDOMETRA ACUTI
Fig. 85.—LATERAL VIEW OF
S CENTRODORSAL AND CIRRI,
PROPORTIONS OF THE ARMS, PINNULE
140 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Among the holothurians we find many cases of large fenestrated plates provided
with inwardly projecting processes, which are probably primarily compounded from
several smaller primitive plates and underlying spicules (fig. 70, p. 127).
The development of the large crinoidal plates, which are of quite different
phylogenetical significance, is fundamentally a continuation of just such a condi-
tion, the original plates as formed growing inward by means of long spicular
outgrowths which anastomose according to a definite plan, and finally give rise to
more or less dense and very definite calcareous masses.
Although in the earliest stages of the ontogeny phylogenetically far advanced
over the body plates of the cystideans or of the Psolide, we appear to have in the
crinoids, as in the other highly calcareous echinoderms, evidence that the large
and definite plates, perfectly and characteristically formed as they now are, arose
primarily through the union of several plates and a great development of spicules
just within them; in other words through a secondary, doubtless purely mechanical,
grouping of the elements of a primitive diffuse spicular skeleton.
Had the echinoderms remained as inactive as the sponges or the aleyonarians
they, too, would doubtless have developed a similar dense, but diffuse and more or
less amorphous, spicular skeleton, and in them it would have been chiefly con-
fined to the outer body layers; but all of the echinoderm classes retained to a
greater or lesser degree their primitive bodily, if not their locomotor, activity, and
this activity has been sufficient to prevent, except in such inert groups as the cysti-
deans, and the Psolidw among the holothurians, any development from the original
spiculated skeleton other than a remarkable specialization, in certain cases, of the
individual spicules; indeed in the pelagic holothurians there has remained, or there
has been secondarily acquired, so much activity that it has resulted in the entire
suppression.of the skeleton.
Autotomy.
Autotomy of essentially the same type, frequently more or less restricted to
definite specialized regions, is common to the echinoderms and crustaceans, and in
both it is developed to a very varying degree in different classes. It is quite possible
to regard the adolescent autotomy of the crinoids as comparable to a crustacean
moult.
This process, strange as it is, really is not so anomalous as it would appear at
first sight. Except for a thin ventral band of perisome underlain by attenuated
extensions from the ring systems about the mouth, the crinoid arms are composed
of solid calcareous plates developed by the growth inward of what is, reduced to its
lowest terms, a calcified cuticle. The brachials, being mostly composed of a solid
calcareous mass, are not able to increase in size with sufficient rapidity to meet the
exigencies imposed by the rapid larval growth, with the single exception of the
first (more rarely, in the more specialized types, of the first three), which has a much
less extensive skeleton than the succeeding. Development of the first brachial
without a corresponding development in those succeeding, or in the ligaments
between it and the second, inevitably results in an increasing tension in the liga-
ments the development of which is arrested, and which therefore are not able to
141
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS.
PROMINENT
N OF AMPHIMETRA ENSIFER FROM SINGAPORE SHOWING THE VERY
Fig. 86.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIME
SYNARTHRIAL TUBERCLES.
142 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
alter themselves sufliciently to meet the new conditions imposed, and this increas-
ing tension finally comes to exceed the tensile strength of those ligaments so that
the original arms are cast off at the synarthry between the first and second brachials
(more rarely, in the more specialized types, at the syzygy between the third and
fourth) and two or more new arms of a more specialized type are developed from
the stumps. The larval arms which are cast off, being composed for the greater part
of an enormous extension inward of the original calcareous cuticle, are in effect a
dermal structure incapable of further development of which the animal must rid
itself before normal growth can continue. Thus, in effect, the larval crinoid arms are
precisely equivalent to the calcified integument of the crustacean appendages,
which similarly must from time to time be cast off to permit of the further develop-
ment of the animal. The casting off of the larval crinoid arms is therefore seen to
present a most striking similarity, as a physiological process, to the crustacean
moult. While normally only the multibrachiate comatulids discard their larval
arms, all of the comatulids discard their larval cirri. The new cirri which sup-
plant these, however, are not developed in the same situation, but always form
nearer the edge of the centrodorsal, that is, in terms of a bilaterally symmetrical
animal, more anteriorly. A precisely similar shifting in the position of the appen-
dages after a moult occurs in many crustaceans and insects. The entire larval
column distal to the first stem syzygy is always discarded, both in the comatulids
and in the pentacrinites. Many instances of a similar rejection of larval structures
(as an example, the prolegs of lepidopterous larvee) among both the insects and the
crustaceans may be at once recalled. In many comatulids there appears to occur
from time to time, more or less normally, a shedding of the visceral mass. Dendy
has suggested that this may be an effort on the part of the animal to rid itself of
internal parasites; but it appears to me to find its most reasonable explanation as a
sort of growth moult comparable to the more or less extensive moulting of internal
structures which accompanies the shedding of the skin in the crustaceans and in
the insects.
Orientation and the metameric divisions of the echinoderms.
Tt has been commonly supposed that among the echinoderms the five radial
systems are primarily the five ambulacral systems, the interradial or interambu-
lacral systems being developed merely as space fillers. My studies on the crinoids,
however, have shown conclusively that, while the prolongations from the ventral
ring systems are fundamentally and primarily single and radial, the skeletal ele-
ments and the dorsal nerves are primarily and fundamentally double and inter-
radial, the two halves of each of the five interradial structures having moved away
from each other and having fused with the similar branches from the adjoining
interradial units with which they came in contact. The single radial derivatives
from the ventral systems have grown out upon supports each of which is formed
by the fusion of two halves of adjaceht interradial processes, and is innervated by
one-half of each of the adjacent interradial nerve trunks. In other words the metam-
eric divisions of the dorsal and the ventral part of the crinoid body alternate with
each other; for the primarily ventral structures the ambulacral areas each represent
143
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS.
Sot
=~,
a ee ee ee ee
STE TESTO REA TERETTiTie penDsvSUAVAUAULUDUAIAE
Cosa MDA
STU AEE
re
NG THE RELATIVE
OMETRA UNICORNIS FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, SHOWT
§ OF THE ARMS, PINNULES,
N OF CEN
Fig. 87.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIME
CENTRODORSAL, AND CIRRI.
PROPORTION:
144 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
a primitive metameric division, but for the primarily dorsal structures the inter-
ambulacral areas each represent a primitive metameric division.
A very strong reason for considering the five dorsal metameric units of the
echinoderms to be the five interradial areas plus one-half of the radial areas on either
side is that the connection between the internal structures and the exterior is
always interradial; the stone canals, the madreporites, and the madreporic pores, as
well as the genital openings (except in the crinoids, in which the genital system is
scarcely comparable in a broad morphological way to that in the other echinoderms)
are always interradial, exactly as the connection between the internal structures and
the exterior, the nephridial, genital, or tracheal pores, in insects and crustaceans are
always in the middle of a metamere and never on the border line between two
metameres.
Moreover, in the original ring of 10 coronal plates the interradial plates (basals
and genitals) are always much larger than the radial (infrabasals and oculars).
This in itself would suggest that these interradial plates indicate areas of phylo-
genetically greater significance.
Furthermore, the teeth in the echinoids, each of which moves out and back
like the mandibles of the bilateral invertebrates, and the orals of the crinoids, which
have the same motion, are interradial, each undoubtedly occupying the center of a
somite just as do the mandibles of crustaceans and insects.
But the most conclusive proof of the extraordinary alternation between the
metameric divisions of the dorsal and of the ventral portions of the body lies in the
fact that the primordial tentacles and the ccelomic chambers, ventral structures,
are developed in the center of the ambulacral areas, while the primary nerves arising
from the dorsal nervous center lie in the center of the interambulacral areas.
The unit of the pentamerous symmetry in the echinoderms, therefore, so far
as the calcareous structures and the nerves are concerned, can not be considered
as a single ambulacral system plus one-half of each of the adjacent interambulacral
systems, but must be regarded as a single interradius plus one-half of the ambulacral
systems on either side. Ventrally, however, the unit of the pentamerous symmetry
is the radial ambulacral extensions of the various circumoral systems, all of which
are single. Thus, in the echinoderms, while the pentamerous symmetry of the
calcareous structures and dorsal nerves is strictly interradial in its arrangement,
that of all the other ambulacral structures is strictly radial, and we find two differ-
ent phases of the same type of symmetry in the same animal. But though more
organs are involved in the ventral radial pentamerous symmetry than in the dorsal
interradial pentamerous symmetry, the latter is of far greater phylogenetical
significance; it has resulted from a fundamental readjustment of one of the most
significant systems of the echinodermal organization, accompanied by a profound
change in a system recognized as possibly the most diagnostic in comparative
morphology, while the former merely is the result of the extraordinary development of
five radial buds on each of the circumoral rings, made possible by the existence
of the latter.
Now according to the former interpretation the five crinoid arms represent
five individual structures each complete in itself and each commencing with one of
nage
*
145
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS.
- =.
SS
SS
Ri
“ SUNTAN NONP LOAD
ETT CoS SSAC
eee
(ML
LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF TROPIOMETRA AFRA FROM QUEENSLAND, SHOWING THE RELATIVE PROPORTIONS
Fia. 88.
AND CIRRI.
RSAL,
OF THE ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRODO
= ae
146 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
the radials as a base, and they have been heretofore universally so considered. In
this case the existence of two plates between the bases of the two posterior in many
types would be a fact of considerable morphological significance as designating a
fundamentally differentiated area; but according to the latter interpretation the
five interradial areas, including half of the ambulacral system on either side of each,
are the true units of pentamerous symmetry, and therefore the existence of addi-
tional plates in one of the interradial areas merely indicates that the two borders
of this area have for some reason or other become somewhat more separated than
those of the other four, necessitating the development of protective plates to cover
the exposed perisome, the occurrence of such plates having a fundamental mor-
phological signifigance no greater than that of polydactylism of a single limb among
the vertebrates or arthropods.
It must be constantly borne in mind that there is absolutely no direct corre-
lation betWeen the primarily skeleton forming dorsal surface of a crinoid and the
primarily perisomic ventral surface and the (secondarily) superficial ventral internal
organs.
The skeleton of the dorsal surface and the dorsal nervous system are governed
in their arrangement entirely by the heredity and by the ancestral meristic division,
the somatic divisions, here consisting each of an interradial area with half of the
adjacent radial areas or ambulacral areas as borders, constituting the five half meta-
meres of which the crinoid is composed. A secondary rearrangement both of the
calcareous structures and of the nerves has taken place which to a large extent
masks this original arrangement, especially in the elongate body processes, but it
may always be detected on close examination.
The prolongation of the closely apposed marginal plates of the five original
metameric divisions into arms offered an opportunity for the extension of the ring
systems about the cesophagus in five long radial lines, of which advantage imme-
diately was taken; or, to express it in another way, the arms in their elongation have
drawn out into long processes lying upon their ventral surface the radial diverticula
from the radial circumoral systems with which they are, on account of their phylo-
genetical and ontogenetical origin, most intimately and indissolubly connected.
Thus there is 2 marked secondary correlation of very recent origin within the
class between the dorsal and ventral systems which is the result of economic possi-
bilities afforded by the intersomatic (radial) extensions of the dorsal system to the
ventral systems.
In the primitive phyllopods the body consists of a large but varying number
of segments which are remarkably uniform in structure, but in the remaining
groups the segments become localized in definite and strongly marked body divi-
sions;.in these the most usual number of significant somatic divisions included
within the thorax is five (well illustrated in the Decapoda) and this fact is seen to
be of no little importance when we realize that the echinoderms are essentially one-
half of a five-segmented crustacean thorax from which the head and the abdomen
have disappeared by atrophy concurrently with the missing side. In this connec-
tion the greatly overdeveloped thorax of the majority of the crustaceans, and the
entire degeneration of the head of others, should be noted.
147
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS.
Rys
SS
ay
MN
» a a
QO. SSSes WSS
en Son eS
XS IN LANNY
oN w . ns =
Uh 4 \ SS y “SS “Ss
SY se <
“A SS me = SE
\\ i SS SNS
‘
AN i ih
<p r\ \ \
ESAS SY EN SS
SS
or NEOMETRA ACANTHASTER FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, SHOWING THE RELATIVE
Fi@. 89.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN
PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL, AND CIRRIL.
PROPORTIONS OF THE ARMS,
148 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
For purely mechanical reasons a radially symmetrical animal in which the
divisions between the radii are formed by sutures or other lines of weakness will
always be divided into three, five or seven parts, so that none of the lines of weak-
ness will pass through the center and thus subject the organism to danger of dis-
ruption through a shearing strain; but if the divisions between the radii are formed
by lines of increased strength, as in the ccelenterates, the animal will be divided
into an even number of parts, the continuation of the lines of strength across the
center to the opposite periphery giving an added rigidity which would be lost
were the divisions uneven in number.
A comparative study of the crustaceans indicates that five is the most com-
mon number of fully developed thoracic metameres. The coincidence of the
number of available metameres and the number of radial somatic divisions offering
the maximum resistance to external forces doubtless played an important part in
the evolution of, and the establishment of pentaradiate symmetry in, the echino-
derms.
The lateral body wall of the crinoid and of the echinoid is the body wall
of half of each of five metameres of the insects or crustaceans, the other halves, on
the opposite side of the body, having become atrophied so that each of the five
developed half metameres have become curved about into a circle, the free anterior
edge of the first joining with the free posterior edge of the fifth and forming a crea-
ture with perfect radial symmetry. In this transformation the five remaining half
metameres have become most curiously altered; the ventral portion of the five half
metameres have in some way become dissociated from the dorsal portion so that
when the final equilibrium of the adult is attained the ventral structures of each
of the five half metameres are found to be alternating in position with the dorsal
structures of the same half metameres instead of, as naturally would be expected,
lying in the same radial planes.
During this process the mouth and the peristomal region have become turned
upward so that they now occupy a circular area delimited by what was originally
the middorsal line of the body; in the crinoids the anal opening occurs in the same
area, but in the urchins it occupies a circular area at the opposite pole delimited
by what was originally the midventral line of the body.
The ventral disk of the crinoid is composed of both the anterior and posterior.
portions of the animal, united in one; the column arises from the midventral area;
the area between is true lateral, corresponding in all ways to the sides of insects
and crustaceans.
The peristome of the echinoid is anterior and the periproct posterior; but the
intervening area corresponds as in the crinoids to one side of an insect or a crustacean.
Briefly stated the relation between the bilateral crustacean type and the
pentaradiate echinoderm type is as follows: the echinoderm consists of one-half
of a five segmented crustacean thorax from which the head, abdomen, and left
side have disappeared by atrophy; as the left side became atrophied the right halves
of the five metameres curved about until at last the anterior and posterior ends
met, so that a radial body with five similar and equal radial divisions was formed;
in some manner during this process the ventral and the dorsal portions of each
149
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS.
Stomp pe SU DUNT
oe
Dp ey
che %
\\ re
or XQ
r
C
‘A
Y
B
©
QB
SS
mae
KAS
SSD 7o
Perit
Fie. 90.
Fia. 91.
SHOWING CIRRI OF
TRA MULLERI FROM NEW SouTH WALES
RAL VIEW OF A YOUNG SPECIMEN OF PTILOME
AND SMOOTH CHARITOMETRID TYPE. 91, LAT
Fias. 90,91.—90, LATE.
ERAL VIEW OF A YOUNG SPECIMEN OF PTILOMETRA MOLLERI
AND SMOOTH CHARITOMETRID TYPE, BUT WITH THE TERMINAL
THE SHORT, STOUT,
SHOWING CIRRI OF THE SHORT, STOUT,
FrroM NEw SouTH WALES,
LASSOMETRID TYPE,
PORTION BEGINNING TO TRANSFORM INTO THE THA
150 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
metamere became dissociated from each other, so that the pentaradiate echino-
derm body consists really of ten radial divisions, five ‘‘radial,’”’ representing the
ventral portion of the five original metameres (oriented most obviously by the five
primordial tentacles), alternating with five ‘“nterradial,’’ representing the dorsal
portion of the five original metameres (oriented by the five ‘‘dorsal’’ nerves).
The dorsoventral axis remains as it was originally; the anteroposterior axis
has become resolved into a circle; each of the planes originally passing through the
center of each metamere and crossing the anteroposterior axis at right angles has
become divided into a dorsal and a ventral portion, and the resulting ten planes
have become radially arranged with their inner edges coinciding with the dorso-
ventral axis.
The digestive tube, originally lying along the anteroposterior axis, has been
forced out of this position through the rearrangement of the five half metameres
in the form of a closed circle, and either comes to coincide with the dorsoventral
axis (echinoids and holothurians) or to occupy a position at the ventral pole
(crinoids).
In this connection a very extraordinary feature of crinoid morphology, which
has hitherto passed unnoticed, should be considered. In the bilaterally symmet-
rical animals development begins at the head and gradually works backward along
the anteroposterior axis of the body toward the tail. Thus when we pass from
the tail of an animal (embryo or adult) toward the head we pass over segments
(or groups of segments) of progressively increasing specialization and perfection,
the most highly specialized and the most perfect being found at the extreme anterior
end. In the crinoids the head, or what remains of the head, occupies an apical
position at the focus of the five radial divisions which represent the neural portions
of the five (originally thoracic) half somites. But the remnant of the head still
retains its influence as the center and, as it were, the originator of morphological
specialization and perfection. This progressive morphological specialization and
perfection makes itself felt not along the original axis (now reduced to a circle from
which the head is entirely detached), but along the five radial divisions which rep-
resent the axes of the neural portion of the five half somites of which the echino-
derm body is composed, as well as along the axis of the column; in short, along each
and every line which departs from the central nerve mass, no matter what direc-
tion it takes. hus it is that, as the new brachials and new pinnules are added
distally, each successive brachial and pinnule is less perfect than its predecessor,
for it is developed at a greater distance from the morphological center of perfec-
tion; and as the columnals and the cirri receive accessions to their number only
between those already formed and the central nerve mass, each new columnal and
each new whorl of cirri is more perfect than those preceding. On account of the
apical situation in the echinoderms of what represents the head in the bilaterally
symmetrical invertebrates, each of the five dorsal radial divisions of the body, and
in the Pelmatozoa also the column, have come to assume to a certain extent the
developmental features normal to the neural portion of the body of a bilaterally
symmetrical invertebrate. This idea may be roughly indicated by comparing the
crinoid body to a cluster composed of the neural portion of six primitive crustacean
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 151
or insect bodies united by the possession of a single head in common, from which
center five of the bodies, radiating outward, represent the five rays of the crinoid
while the sixth represents the column.
The question which of the intermetameric divisions in the echinoderms rep-
resents the plane of union between the originally free and opposite anterior and
Fig. 92.—LATERAL VIEW OF A YOUNG SPECIMEN OF PTILOMETRA MACRONEMA FROM SOUTHWESTERN AUSTRALIA, SHOWING THE
CIRRI APPROACHING THE ADULT TYPE.
posterior extremes of the body is of no concern in a discussion of the adult animals.
‘After the union of the two ends the body as a whole becomes truly and absolutely
radial, and any subsequent modification, no matter of what description, is based
or projected upon a fundamentally radial body.
152 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Relationship between the digestive tube and asymmetry.
In all the echinoderm classes it is the digestive tube that controls any departure
from the primitive radial symmetry. In the two groups in which the digestive
tube itself is radially symmetrical, with its axis always at right angles to the plane
of the circle representing the somatic axis (the Asteroidea and the Ophiuroidea),
none but the most trifling departures from the radial symmetry occur; but in the
other three groups (Pelmatozoa, Echinoidea and Holothuroidea) in which the diges-
tive tube retains its original character, its anteroposterior axis often becomes inclined
to the plane of the circle representing the somatic axis, or, by a migration usually
of the anus, sometimes of the mouth, occasionally of both, becomes modified into a
crescent or horseshoe-like curve, in which event the animal immediately develops a
bilateral symmetry which is accentuated roughly in proportion to the departure
of this axis from its normal position, though decreasing again if the anus approaches
close to the mouth.
The axis of the digestive tube always maintains its character as a true axis,
and is continually endeavoring to assert itself and to overcome the conservatism or
inertia of the circular somatic axis, and to impose its ancestral bilateralism upon a
normally radial body. In this it has been to a large degree successful among the
more specialized types, in the so-called irregular urchins and in many of the holo-
thurian groups, which have secondarily assumed a bilateralism which, in view of
the limitations imposed by the primarily radial structure of the animals, may be
regarded as extreme. The elongation of the body among the holothurians I regard
as due to the dominance of this axis over the somatic, and not in any way suggesting
wormlike affinities.
Many of the crinoids advanced far along similar lines; but the shrinking of the
calyx as well as the close approach of the two ends of the digestive tube and the
consequent neutralization of the bilateral tendency have combined to inhibit its
effect, especially in the later forms.
In the crinoids the anus opens in the interambulacral area of the disk opposite
the anterior ray (figs. 20, p. 69, and 117, p. 183). It is not simply an opening in
the integument, but is situated usually at the summit, more rarely on the side or
at the base, of a conical proboscis, which may be expanded into a huge sac, and is
always large.
In the species of the family Comasteride the interambulacral area including
the anal proboscis is typically greatly enlarged, occupying nearly the entire surface
of the disk (figs. 25-28, p. 69). The digestive tube makes about four complete
concentric coils, all centering directly beneath the anal proboscis (fig. 21, p. 69).
The digestive tube turns to the right, so that the coils are wound in the direction
taken by the hands of a clock.
Additional growth by a digestive tube of the type occurring in the species of
Comasteridx, or dilation due to gorging with food, tends to broaden the various
coils, and also tends to force the mouth toward the right; because of the small size
of the body cavity, the chief effect is evident in the latter direction. Thus it is that
in many of the species of Comasteride we find the mouth pushed from its normal
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 153
SD
Sage
REP,
SS
me
o
; pe
bas
<—
iw
Si
ci
A
SaaS
Seana
SS
Ae
A eet) :
IEEE SSS ,
FG. 93.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF PTILOMETRA MACRONEMA FROM DIRK HARTOG ISLAND, SHOWING THE RELATIVE
ks PROPORTIONS OF THE ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL, AND CIRRIL
11
79146°—Bull. 82—15
154 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
position at the base of the anterior postradial series, which it always occupies in
the young, far to the right, so that it comes to lie midway between the bases of the
anterior and the right anterior postradial series (figs. 25-28, p. 69).
The various ring systems maintain their original position about the mouth;
hence the left posterior ray, orienting from the position of the mouth and the central
anal tube, has now become posterior, and is thereby placed at a great disadvantage
through being at a greater distance from the circumoral ring systems than any other
ray, and typically it becomes atrophied, entirely losing its tentacles, ambulacral
grooves and ambulacral nerves (fig. 27, p. 69). This condition is often found also
on the left anterior and right posterior rays, now become the left and right latero-
posterior, these being at a considerable disadvantage when compared with the two
anterior rays, one of which is situated on either side of the mouth.
In these species of Comasteridee we find a perfect bilateral symmetry; an
anterior mouth midway between two exactly similar rays, a central anal proboscis,
and a dwarfed posterior ray with two exactly similar, sometimes more or less
dwarfed, rays, one on either side of it (figs. 27, 28, p. 69).
There can be little doubt that this secondary bilateral symmetry in the Comas-
teride is the direct result of the pressure resulting from the growth of the digestive
tube, a pressure which constantly tends to force the mouth to the right, the mouth
in its migration taking with it all the cireumoral ring systems; for in comasterids
with a central mouth, and in the young of the other forms before the mouth has
begun to migrate, the five postradial series are always similar and equal.
The calyx plates of all the species of Comasteride are so reduced that they
form merely a small central disk upon which, as well as upon the arm bases, the
visceral mass rests. This relationship between the calyx and the visceral mass is
common to the pentacrinites, the thiolliericrinites, and the comatulids, and in the
young comasterid is far advanced, in fact almost perfected, before the migration of
the mouth begins, so that we are justified in assuming that it is phylogenetically
much older than the beginnings of the additional coils of the digestive tube. Thus
it has not been possible for the coiling of the digestive tube to exert any direct influ-
ence whatever upon the calyx plates or upon the arms, for whatever goes on within
the visceral mass is necessarily quite independent of the dorsal skeleton.
The mouth is more or less fixed in position by the ambulacral structures which’
lead to it; moreover, growth of the digestive tube whereby its length is increased
does not take place in the anterior, but in the posterior portion. Therefore the
lengthening of the digestive tube results in the formation of a spiral about the anal
proboscis as a center, this structure moving more and more centralward as the spiral
increases the number of its turns.
The ring systems about the mouth, and their radial continuations to the arms,
are accommodated by a more or less vertical position of the anterior part of the
digestive tube. The horizontal coils of the posterior portion of the digestive tube
about the anal proboscis as a center press upon the subambulacral systems running
to the two posterior arms; these are therefore shoved to one side and come to lie ina
marginal position, forming a horseshoe about the anterior portion of the disk, where
they fuse more or less with the same structures running to the three anterior arms.
155
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS.
Fig. 94.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF ASTEROMETRA MACROPODA FROM SOUTHWESTERN JAPAN, SHOWING THE RELATIVE
PROPORTIONS OF THE ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL, AND CIRRI.
156 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
After all possible compensation has been made for the elongation of the digestive
tube beneath the enormously enlarged anal area, further pressure forces accommo-
dation by a lateral migration of the mouth to the right, resulting in the secondary
bilateral symmetry.
This interpretation of the conditions found in the Comasteride gives us a clue
to the significance of the anal structures characteristic of the species exhibiting so-
called secondary bilateral symmetry. In these species, so far as we know, the diges-
tive tube makes a little more than one complete turn, to the right, as in the Comas-
teride; the mouth is central or very nearly so, while the anal proboscis, situated in
an interambulacral area which is more or less enlarged, is marginal or submarginal.
The digestive tube runs about the margin of the disk, its anterior portion turning
abruptly centralward to the mouth; this anterior portion is narrow, of more or
less fixed diameter, and of more or less fixed position. The middle and posterior
portions of the digestive tube are larger, more variable, and less fixed. Thus any
lengthening of the digestive tube, or any gorging with food, has the effect of alter-
ing the relationships of the posterior end, the anal proboscis and the surrounding
structures.
In the echinoderms with a rigid covering, the echinoids, asteroids and ophiu-
roids, each end of the digestive tube is more or less firmly fixed; hence the accom-
modation necessary as a result of the motion constantly taking place is taken up
along its central portion within the ample body cavity. In most of the holo-
thurians the elastic and pliable body wall admits of accommodation to internal
changes, while in the others accommodation is effected as in the urchins. In the
echinoids, asteroids, ophiuroids and holothurians, therefore, there is no incentive
to external change from the constant changes taking place in the digestive tube in
the exercise of its functions.
In the crinoids conditions are quite otherwise; here the body cavity is reduced
to a minimum; the dorsal part of the visceral mass is inclosed by a rigid cup and the
ventral part is roofed over by a pliant, though more or less plated or at least spicu-
liferous, tegmen. Owing to the small size of the body cavity all the internal organs
which are unable to migrate out along the radial extensions are greatly crowded.
Any internal movements must therefore be accommodated by changes in the ven-
tral covering which, if extensive, may be communicated to the calyx plates about
its border.
I have remarked that the interambulacral area in which the anal proboscis les
is always the largest of the five interambulacral areas; its surface is also always the
most convex. The constant movements of the posterior end of the digestive tube
appear to be amply sufficient to explain this.
Now the posterior portion of the digestive tube enters the region under the
posterior interambulacral area from the right; hence the tendency of the motions
here and of the lengthening of the digestive tube would be to shove the anal pro-
boscis constantly toward the left, and also, as the digestive tube rises into the
anal proboscis, to pull the surface of the outer right hand side of the posterior
interambulacral area upward.
157
CRINOIDS.
x
THE EXISTING
MONOGRAPH OF
a>
YY
SLY <<
Sy ~
Stoo, ~
a
set,
SS
aero
saa
Sarr el
re A caaeas a
Seong"
arty
aay
cop
~~ ss
mS
—
~
~
ae
- A
4A
So, eS
Fia. 95.
Fig. 95.— LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF THALASSOMETRA VILLOSA FROM THE WESTERN ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, SHOWING THE
RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF THE ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL AND CIRRIL
158 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Now the effect of the movements of the posterior end of the digestive tube
upon the progressive reduction in the size of the calyx, and upon the reduction of
the number of the calyx plates, is continually to hinder its progress in the posterior
interradial or anal area, so that this area constantly remains somewhat larger than
the others and is the last one from which the primitive calyx plates, having become
functionless and obsolete, are dropped. The lateral and ventral movements in the
posterior end of the digestive tube cause a continual lifting stress, which is exerted
in a diagonal direction toward the upper right-hand corner of the posterior inter-
radial or anal area, or more correctly result in propping up this corner of the pos-
terior interradial area, as well as the right posterior postradial series, so as greatly
to hinder the consummation of the reductive processes.
As a consequence of this force, always present and constantly exerted, the
interradial and other plates in the posterior interradial area are able to maintain
their individuality and their existence long after they have entirely disappeared
from all the other areas, while as a result of the constant propping up of the right
posterior ray the subradial plate is able to maintain itself under that ray long
after it has disappeared from beneath all of the others; at the same time the tend-
ency to reduction, which is just as strong in the posterior as in the other inter-
radial areas, will be confined to the left-hand side of that area, so that all of the
plates and structures lying in it will be distorted and turned toward the right.
The presence of the persistent subradial plate under the right posterior radial
is a characteristic feature of many genera in the Flexibilia, and, so far as is known,
this plate is always present in the young of the recent forms (fig. 563, pl. 6). But
its true significance and its homologies have heretofore never been understood; ia
the fossil types it has been considered a distinct entity and dignified by the name
of radianal, while in the recent types, as for instance in Antedon, it has always been
known as the anal, though it has nothing whatever to do with the so-called anal
of the fossil species.
The observed tendencies in the species of the fossil Crinoidea Flexibilia, and
the effects which we would naturally infer would follow in crinoids undergoing
reduction in the size of the visceral mass and of the calyx which possess a digestive
tube of the type occurring in the recent species (excepting certain comasterids) for
purely mechanical reasons, are thus seen to be in perfect agreement.
As the entire test of the urchin, except for its small apical portion, is comparable
to that part of the erinoid between the apical system and the arm bases, it naturally
follows that any increase in the plates of the latter in this intermediate area is a
step in the direction of the urchins.
The radial is the equivalent of two of the ambulacrals of the urchins; the
radianal (or any one of the subradials) is the counterpart of another (single) ambu-
lacral formed between the radial, which represents the two radial ambulacrals border-
ing the peristome, and the infrabasal, which represents the ocular.
Thus the subradials of the crinoids are formed exactly in the same place and
in the same manner as the series of ambulacrals in the echinoids, and they not only
give us a valuable clew to the paths of divergence of the crinoids and of the echinoids
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 159
Figs. 96-98.—96, LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF THALASSOMETRA MARGINATA FROM THE LACCADIVE
' ISLANDS, SHOWING THE RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF THE ARM BASES, CENTRODORSAL AND CIRRI, THE
ARRANGEMENT OF THE CIRRI ON THE CENTRODORSAL, AND THE TUBERCULATED DORSAL POLE OF
THE LAST NAMED. 97, LATERAL VIEW OF THE IBR, RADIALS, CENTRODORSAL AND CIRRI OF A SPEC-
IMEN OF STIREMETRA CARINIFERA FROM THE INDIAN OCEAN, SHOWING THE RELATIVE PROPORTIONS
BETWEEN THESE STRUCTURES, AND THE BIDENTATE DORSAL KEELS OF THE MORE PROXIMAL OF
THE OUTER CIRRUS SEGMENTS. 98, LATERAL VIEW OF THE PROXIMAL PORTION OF A SPECIMEN OF
PSATHYROMETRA MAJOR FROM THE EAsT INDIES, SHOWING THE RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF THE
CIRRI, CENTRODORSAL AND ARM BASES, AND THE ARRANGEMENT OF THE CIRRI ON THE CENTRO-
DORSAL.
160 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
from their common ancestor, but also suggest the original method of formation of
the division series as developed in the crinoids.
The existence of the radianal and of anal z in the fossil erinoids and in the
pentacrinoids of the recent forms indicates the persistence of transitional character
between the crinoids and the urchins.
Mr. Frank Springer has noticed that in the Crinoidea Flexibilia there is a
curious influence which has modified the bilateral symmetry of almost every genus,
always in the same way; the small infrabasal is almost invariably located under
the right posterior radial; the radianal originates under the right posterior radial
and migrates from this position upward until it disappears, but always keeps to
the right of the median line of the posterior inter-
a ambulacral area; the vertical series of plates arising
Popes from anal g is affected by the same tendency which
ap dS . persists long after the radianal has disappeared, and
‘ pe oo leans to the right so that the vacant space is always
Seed? widest at the left.
A we arz The modification and differentiation of the anal
Se ee eg> area in the older fossil crinoids by the occurrence
to = of a radianal and of the so-called anal z, while in the
Sas later and recent types the anal area is similar to the
other interradial areas, would seem to indicate that
a perfected radial symmetry was attained through a
condition in which the posterior interradial area
was distinguished by the existence of two plates not
occurring elsewhere, and therefore that primarily the
crinoids were bilaterally symmetrical animals which
attained radial symmetry through a shortening of
the body and a correlated centralization of the
Fig. 99.—LATERAL VIEW OF THE PROXI-
MAL PORTION OF A SPECIMEN OF CHLO-
ROMETRA RUGOSA FROM THE PHILIP-
PINE ISLANDS, SHOWING THE RELATIVE
PROPORTIONS OF THE CIRRI, CENTRO-
DORSAL AND ARM BASES, AND THE
ARRANGEMENT OF THE CIRRI ON THE
various organs. Additional facts apparently sup-
porting this view are the stability and absence of
variation of the anterior arm, which is not infre-
quently absent (though no case has been reported in
which any of the other arms are absent), and the
bilateral behavior of variation affecting the other four
SEN r SAL. . .
eae arms. The evidence on these points seemed so conclu-
sive that I once suggested the possibility of the derivation of the echinoderms through
a bilateral ancestor with two pairs of lateral body processes, the (not infrequently
absent) anterior arm being explained as one-half of an additional pair interpolated
between the two processes of the anterior bilateral pair; and I suggested as repre-
senting a step toward such a condition such variants among the insects as possessed
an additional wing inserted anterior to one of the wings of the anterior pair.
This theory appeared to have abundant paleontological support, and was
moreover emphasized by the fact that in six-rayed individuals the added ray is
almost invariably inserted behind the left posterior, thus again pointing to the
anal area as representing a true vegetative posterior region.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 161
At that time I was well aware that the facts of embryology tended to discredit
my conclusions, but I hoped later to find some way by which they might be shown
to be in reality in agreement with them; the paleontological evidence and the
evidence derived from the study of variants was apparently so clear that I con-
sidered myself safe in relying implicity upon it.
The recent and later fossil crinoids all have a much more perfect radial pentam-
erous symmetry than those of the paleozoic; but from the facts brought out by
a study of the development of Antedon and by a comparative study of each of
the various sets of structures which collectively make up the crinoid whole, both
in the earlier and in the later types, it becomes evident that the primitive crinoidal
arrangement is a perfect pentamerous symmetry, each radial with its post-radial
series being exactly like every other, and each interradial area also being exactly
like all the other interradial areas. In other words, the primitive erinoid was
as regularly radially symmetrical as the most regular of the urchins.
Zones of similar skeletal potency.
One of the results of the assumption of radial symmetry by the crinoids, and
by the echinoderms generally, has been the eventual delimitation of concentric
zones of similar skeletal potency. This is not by any means a new structural
feature, but an adaptation of a very general one in a somewhat new form.
If we take any crustacean or insect and draw a line around the contour of the
animal from the midline of its dorsal surface to the midline of its ventral surface,
we find that that line passes over several different thicknesses of dermal covering
of which the most dense is the dorsal and the least dense is the ventral, and the
same relative proportions are found between the different heights at all points,
the degree of morphological differentiation decreasing from the neural (dorsal) to
the hemal (ventral) apex in all the radii. A line from the apex of a crinoid, or from
the edge of the periproct in the echinoid, to the edge of the ventral disk in the crinoid
and the edge of the peristome in the echinoid, covers exactly the same ground as a
line from the middorsal to the midventral line in the bilateral crustaceans or insects.
In the echinoids we find in the skeleton forming portion of the body wall two
distinct zones, the coronal ring and the area between this ring and the peristome;
but in the crinoids the conditions are more complex. Here we have the coronal
ring always divided into two separate rings; the first of these, the infrabasal ring,
is composed of small plates which, like the oculars of the echinoids which they
represent, are singularly uniform in proportions, and admit of no additions to
their number; the second, the basal ring, is composed of larger plates which, like
the genitals of the echinoids which they represent, are variable in size, and permit
of additions to their number. The radianal is such an addition.
Any plate added to their number immediately takes on characters identical
with those in the original plates of the series.
Following these are the plates of the intermediate area (pseudambulacrals)
arranged in tandem groups of two each, and beyond them the brachials
Each of these zones, indicated by (1) the infrabasals, (2) the basals, (3) the
pseudambulacrals and (4) the brachials, is a zone of equal growth in which any
Tv
BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
162
» SHOWING THE RELATIVE PROPORTIONS
RI.
- 100.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF GLYPTOMETRA TIMORENSIS FROM TIMOR
Fie
OF THE ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL, AND CIR
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 163
new plate formed will develop along the same lines as the plates already present
in that zone.
The zones of similar skeletal potency of the echinoderm are not entirely radial
as has commonly been assumed, but are chiefly concentric about the dorsal pole as
Fies. 101-102.—101, DoRSAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF STROTOMETRA ORNATISSIMA FROM CELEBES, SHOWING THE ENORMOUS
EVERSION OF THE DISTAL ENDS OF THE EARLIER BRACHIALS. 102, LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF STROTOMETRA ORNA-
TISSIMA FROM CELEBES, SHOWING THE ENORMOUS EVERSION OF THE DISTAL ENDS OF THE EARLIER BRACHIALS.
a center, @ circumstance which is at once explained when we remember the homology
between the sides of a crinoid from the dorsal aspect to the ventral perisome with
the sides of an insect or crustacean.
164 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Internal skeleton.
In the crustaceans the cuticle in the region of certain mouth parts (as for
instance in the region of the mandibles) is folded inward, forming chitinous ‘‘ten-
dons,” or insertions for muscles, protecting the ventral nerve cord and venous
blood sinus, and constituting the complex, apparently but not really, internal
endophragmal skeleton of the thorax. It is a development of this endophragmal
skeleton of the crustaceans which forms the calcareous mouth plates in the holo-
thurians, the complicated ‘‘Aristotle’s lantern”’ of the echinoids, and, folded out-
ward instead of inward, the long and complex arms of the crinoids.
Skeleton of the heteroradiate echinoderms.
Judging from the skeletal system the holothurians and echinoids are the most
primitive of the heteroradiate echinoderms. In both of these groups the longi-
tudinal axis of the digestive system passes (more or less obviously) at right angles
through the center of the circle into which the longitudinal axis of the original meta-
meres has become transformed, and in both there is present a coronal ring of 10
plates, 5 large and 5 smaller, the latter radial in position, this ring in the holothurians
being situated about the cesophagus at the opposite pole of the body from where it
is found in the echinoids.
The bordering plates of each radial division always keep entirely distinct
from those of the adjacent series and never fuse with them, though they may com-
bine to a greater or lesser extent among themselves. The central series of plates
and the bordering plates in the urchins are typically subequal in size, though there
may be more or less difference; the individual plates of each series are always
similar and equal, or very nearly so.
The embryology of the insects and crustaceans shows that development begins
at the anterior end of the body, gradually extending itself posteriorly. Fusion
of segments and other similar phenomena are first evidenced in the anterior portion
of the larva, to which portion they are often confined.
Thus the anterior situation of the calcareous ring of the holothurians would
suggest that in these animals it is a new structure, just in the incipient stage, this
hypothesis being strengthened by its somewhat indefinite character.
Echinoids may be described as holothurians in which the ring of 10 plates,
now of fixed and definite size and interrelationships, has moved backward along
the body to the posterior end, so that it surrounds the anus instead of the mouth,
each plate leaving a trail of reduplications of itself behind it to mark its passage.
In the echinoids the spiculated covering of the body as seen in the holothurians is
now reduced to a small circular area within the coronal ring, and even here the
spicules may be segregated into a single large plate.
The traveling of the coronal ring in the echinoids from the original position
which it occupies in the holothurians to the opposite end of the body is clearly indi-
cated by the fact that new plates in the test are only formed between the plates of
the coronal ring and the plates already formed. In any series of units addition to
the number occurs only at the free end, which is normally the place of increase,
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 165
Thus in the asteroids we know that the terminals at the end of the arms are really
body plates pushed outward by the growth of the arms and by the addition of new
plates just beneath them. And similarly we are equally sure that in the echinoids
Fic. 103.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF ANTEDON PETASUS FROM SWEDEN, SHOWING THE RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF THE
ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL AND CIRRI.
the primitive position of the coronal ring is around the mouth, it having been shoved
to a position about the periproct by the entire growth of the body haying been
ventralward, just as it is outward in the asteroid arm, forming new plates as it
goes.
166 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
The coronal plates of the urchins are definite and distinct, five large, in the
center of the five somatic divisions, and five smaller, situated between them. The
five large stand at the base of the interambulacral series, and the five small cover
the bases of two adjacent marginal series. These coronal plates always main-
tain the same relationship with the other plates. They increase in size more or
less by accretion, but necessarily this accretion occurs only, or at least chiefly, on
their free inner edges. In a circlet of alternating large and small plates the large
plates will possess, through the dominance of excess growth, the more nearly perfect
shape. Thus, the lateral borders of the larger plates will not be directed straight
toward the center of the periproctal area, but will be mutually more convergent;
and so, as the larger plates grow proportionately faster than the smaller ones, they
tend to come into contact behind the smaller ones, cutting these off one by one from
the periproctal area, though without in any way altering their original interrela-
tionships or their relationships with the columns of plates arising from them.
In the crinoids the primitive arrangement of the coronal ring has been altered
by the segregation of the plates into two rings, the larger plates forming a closed
cirelet surrounding the closed circlet composed of the smaller. The central plate,
formed during the echinoid stage by the assembling of the calcareous elements in
the periproctal area within the coronal ring, and by no means a constant feature in
echinoid morphology, has now become fixed and permanent, increased enormously
in size, and become reduplicated so that it typically forms a long and solid column.
The enclosure of the small plates of the coronal ring within the closed circlet
formed by the larger resulted in separating the small plates from the columns of
plates arising from them; these thereupon ceased abruptly to develop, and became
segregated and metamorphosed into the division series.
The internal ring of the holothurians came to the surface and moved to the
posterior end of the body in the echinoids. But in the latter the elements, 10 in
number, of another ring surrounding the anterior portion of the digestive tube
appeared and, in many forms, became greatly multiplied and developed. These
fused with the plates of the body wall on their peristomal border, forming the
auricles, in the more specialized types surmounted by apophyses, and connected
with complicated dental pyramids.
In the crinoids the original coronal ring has become greatly reduced and more
or less degenerate, the small plates becoming frequently reduced to three, or absent
altogether in the adults, and the larger also becoming often reduced to three, or
entirely metamorphosed or absent in the adults. The second coronal ring, con-
sisting of the auricles and apophyses in the echinoids, has in the crinoids followed
the same course as the first; it has become external, the 10 elements having fused
into 5, through lateral apposition with their fellows in the adjacent somatic
areas, Which have become produced as long intersomatic arms borne upon a basal
structure formed of fused and metamorphosed body plates (radials) corresponding
with the somatic marginals of the echinoids (ambulacrals).
‘In the more specialized comatulids the first circlet of coronal plates (infra-
basals) is only represented in the early larva of a few species, and the second is
almost completely altered in early postlarval life, moving inward so as to form an
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 167
internal body septum; the first arm plates (radials) constitute the entire calyx.
Resting upon these first arm plates and the arm bases is the large visceral mass,
more than half of the total area of which is exposed.
Fic. 104.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF ANTEDON BIFIDA FROM PLYMOUTH, ENGLAND, SHOWING THE RELATIVE PROPOR-
TIONS OF THE ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL, AND CIRRI, AND THE INTERPRIMIBRACHIAL PLATES,
In the majority of the holothurians the calcareous plates other than diffuse
spicules are wholly internal, and the entire body wall is soft.
The crinoidal columnals have the same ultimate origin as the calyx plates;
but they arose, not directly from an aggregation of spicules and plates, but see-
168 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
ondarily from a single apical plate which was thickened and then divided into many
segments by a sort of division or continuous twinning process. Each columnal is
thus in itself the equivalent of a single calyx plate, and yet all the columnals col-
lectively are also the equivalent of a single calyx plate. Being of secondary deriva-
tion, the columnals early come to have an entity of their own, so that all but the
very earliest of them are developed as columnals, with little or no hint as to their
phylogenetic origin.
Like the columnals, the brachials are secondarily developed through continu-
ous budding, involving a modified twinning process, from the distal edge of the
radials, which are themselves the first brachials, and they also preserve scarcely
more than a trace of their plate and spicule origin, but appear almost from the first
with all their distinctive characters; indeed so specialized have the brachials become,
and so complex are their interrelationships, that we can only consider them as an
extraordinary and perfect type of pseudo-vertebre.
In the echinoids, except for a small peristome and an equally small or smaller
periproctal area, both protected by spicules or small plates and the latter often in
addition by a more or less perfect suranal, the entire body is enclosed within a
solid calcareous test, and a second coronal ring of 10 detached elements, fused with
the peristomal edge of the interambulacrals (or secondarily of the ambulacrals),
appears.
In the crinoids the body is again largely exposed, especially in the later and
recent species, this exposure beginning at the anterior end and working posteriorly.
The coronal ring has more or less disintegrated, while the arms, derived from the
second coronal ring which first appears in the echinoids, are gradually moving
inward so that their bases are very near together.
The holothurians exhibit (1) the ancestral type of a spiculated body covering,
undifferentiated (or rarely differentiated) into plates; (2) a coronal ring, more or
less developed, of five large (interradial) and five small (radial) plates situated in
the primitive position about the anterior end of the digestive tube; (3) a longi-
tudinal axis determined by the digestive tube which passes through the center of
the circle into which the longitudinal somatic axis has been resolved, at right angles
to its plane.
Speaking broadly, the echinoid is essentially a holothurian encased in a solid
calcareous covering. A crinoid is.essentially a stalked echinoid.
In the evolution of the echinoid from the holothurian-like ancestor the body
necessarily took on a globular form, this form in a solidly encased organism offering
the maximum resistance to fracture and allowing of a maximum of contents. But
the spherical form, quite apart from questions of securing food, etc., is not adapted
to a stalked habit. Supported upon a broad more or less flattened area, as in the
echinoids, it gives the maximum resistance to external forces; but supported on
a very small (apical) area it becomes exceptionally weak. Immediately, therefore,
there results a massing and a concentration of the plates about the apical pole
to form a platform or a solid cup bound tightly to the summit of the column and
making with it practically a single unit upon which the visceral mass, now exposed
by the sudden withdrawal of the plates covering its ventral portion, rests. This
169
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS.
NS
APLES, SHOWING THE RELATIVE PROPORTIO:
N
©RRANEA FROM
MEDIT
Fic. 105.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF ANTEDON
, AND CIRRI.
NTRODORSAL,
OF THE ARMS, PINNULES, CE
12
79146°—Bull. 82—15
170 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
concentration and rearrangement of the plates and their solidification is accom-
panied by an enormous reduction in their total mass, so that the column has a
much lessened weight to support.
The crinoid is most nearly related to the echinoid, but possesses certain features
both of the asteroid and of the ophiuroid,:so that it is to a considerable degree
intermediate between them. The characters which link the crinoids to the echi-
noids on the one hand, and to the asteroids and the ophiuroids on the other, are all
most evident in the older forms; and in these we find the characters connecting
the crinoids and the echinoids more pronounced and more significant than those
connecting the crinoids with the asteroids and the ophiuroids. In the later types
and in all the recent forms the connection with the echinoids has, owing to the
increasing proportionate size of the five radial processes of the body and the corre-
lated proportionate great reduction in the size of the body proper, become largely
obliterated, while the traces of the connection with the asteroids and with the ophiu-
roids have not been subjected to anything like the same degree of suppression.
All the plates of the crinoids and echinoids appear to have been derived from
the cireumeesophageal plates of the holothurians except the auricles and associated
plates in the echinoids, and the brachials beyond the third in the free arm corre-
sponding to them, and the orals, in the erinoids.
The fundamental plate series in all the echinoderms thus appear to reduce
themselves to rings of plates around the mouth, or at least about the anterior
portion of the digestive tube—one in the holothurians, two in the echinoids, and
three in the crinoids.
It remains to be seen whether any homology may be found for these successive
rings of plates among bilaterally symmetrical invertebrates.
These plates consist of five larger, in the midsomatic areas, and usually also
five smaller, in the intersomatic regions, though the latter may be absent as in the
oral ring of the erinoids and in the coronal ring of the blastoids and of the so-called
monocyclic crinoids.
In the echinoids there is commonly developed in connection with the second
ring system, the auricles, an extremely complicated structure known as the ‘‘Aris-
totle’s lantern,”’ consisting of five dental pyramids, each surmounted by a powerful
tooth.
In the insects and crustaceans there is usually developed on at least one of the
anterior somites a pair of powerful mandibles, which may be either wholly chitinous
or partially calcareous. These mandibles are usually associated with the anterior
end of the digestive tube more intimately than any other of the mouth parts.
All the somites of the echinoderms are exactly alike; any structure occurring
in one may, and usually does, occur similarly developed in all the others. In the
rearrangement by which the echinoderms were evolved from their bilateral ances-
try the mandibles and their braces, the most significant of all the mouth parts,
were retained potentially in their original relationship. There being five somatic
divisions about the mouth, the mandibular structures when present are always
repeated five times, each of the repetitions being similar to each of the others.
171
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS.
SHOWING THE RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF THE
CIRRI.
—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF ANTEDON ADRIATICA FROM TRIESTE,
Fie. 106.
AND
ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL,
172 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
Each crustacean limb typically consists of a basal piece, the protopodite,
with two jointed branches rising from it, the internal endopodite and the external
exopodite, though in many forms the outer branch disappears; the protopodite has
usually two segments, a basal or proximal coxopodite and a distal basipodite; it
is the specialization of certain of the appendages to function as masticating organs
which especially characterizes arthropods as compared with annelids. The struc-
ture of the highly complicated ‘“ Aristotle’s lantern”’ in the echinoids, and of the
equally complicated arms of the crinoids, is reducible to the structure of the primi-
tive crustacean appendage, plus the internal accessory structures, while the speciali-
zation of certain of the appendages to function as masticating organs, or at least as
mouth plates, is as characteristic of the echinoderms as it is of the crustaceans.
The mandibles in the articulates are such highly specialized appendages and
so intimately connected with the digestive tube that on reflection it is not sur-
prising to find them in a modified form carried over into the echinoderms.
The mandibular structures in the holothurians are very rudimentary, and this
set passes backward without attaining any further perfection. No sooner does
one set of mandibular structures pass backward from a position about the mouth
than another immediately forms there to take its place.
This second set in the echinoids has attained a most extraordinary development.
In the crinoids, in which this also has moved backward and lost its great com-
plexity, though retaining in the long and tapering arms an extraordinary number
of individual elements.
The third set, the crinoid orals, developed about the mouth on account of the
moving away of the second set to form the arms, are very large, but extremely
simple in structure, and often become entirely resorbed in fully grown animals,
though when this is the case a fourth set sometimes replaces them.
The interpretation of the free undivided arms of the crinoids as remotely
homologous to arthropod appendages explains how the ambulacral grooves and
other ambulacral structures happen to be drawn out upon them. Intimately con-
nected with the mouth, upon moving away from it they drag with them much of
the circumoral structures.
In the same way, in migrating backward over the surface the coronal ring of
the echinoids has carried with it extensions from certain of the mouth structures,
as, for instance, the water vascular tubes.
Embryology teaches us that there is a constant and well-defined path followed
by developing structures. All developmental processes first begin at the head end
of the embryo and gradually extend backward toward the tail.
In the echinoderms the longitudinal axis of the bilateral invertebrate is resolved
into a circle and a straight line passing through the center of the circle, the circle
representing the axis of the somites, the straight line that of the digestive tube.
The circle, with no beginning and no end, has ceased to function as a true
axis, or to have any other significance, leaving the line at right angles to its plane
as the only functional axis.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. ne
Thus it is that in the echinoderms the course of the successive calcareous
rings is from the oral to the aboral end of the animal, and the cireumoral struc-
tures have been drawn backward to the apical pole along with them.
The original somatic divisions of the echinoderms have become so inert that
they play no part whatever in the morphology of the animals, further than indicat-
Fic. 107.—DORSAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF COMPSOMETRA INCOMMODA FROM Port Jackson, NEw SouTH WALES, SHOWING THE
RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF THE ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL, AND CIRRI.
ing the radial symmetry and indicating the paths by which the mouth structures
must travel backward between them.
Within the class the bilateral symmetry of the echinoderms is determined
wholly from the digestive tube.
In the urchins the oculars alway stand at the head of the ambulacral series
from which they are never separated; they always remain extremely important
174 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
constituents of the test, and are perhaps the most important plates of the coronal
ring. In the crinoids there has been a general tendency, though a tendency which
is not in any way regular or uninterrupted, toward the suppression of their equiva-
lents, the infrabasals, and with the suppression of the infrabasals has come the
similar suppression of the following series of plates which are usually, and always
in the later types (excepting in the very young), dispensed with altogether save
for the radials (representing the ambulacrals in the echinoids which immediately
border the peristomal area), which now are closely united to the closed circlet
of basals.
In certain crinoids, mostly post-Silurian, in which the visceral mass is very
large we find a significant reversion in the form of a subradial plate inserted below
the right posterior radial, and later beneath all
the other radials also. These subradial plates are
usually separated from the infrabasals by the
closed circlet of basals; but in a few genera, as in
Thenarocrinus, Sagenocrinus, and Homalocrinus
the one beneath the right posterior radial connects
that radial directly with the infrabasal. These
subradial plates I take to represent the entire am-
bulacral series in the urchins which the great en-
largement of the visceral mass in these types and
the corresponding necessity for the development
of protective plates has permitted to form. Es-
pecially significant in this connection is the genus
Acrocrinus in which the radial circlet is widely
separated from the basal circlet by a very large
number of plates potentially the equivalent of the
plates between the coronal ring and the peristome
in the urchins.
Fic. 108.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF Effect of external mechanics upon the crinoids.
COMPSOMETRA LOVENI FROM PoRT JACKSON, ~ :
New SourH WALES, SHOWING THE RELATIVE We have become so accustomed to dealing
PROPORTIONS OF THE ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRO- with bilaterallysymmetrical animals which move,
DORSAL, AND CIRRI. : A
by means of various methods of progression, head
first in the direction of the longitudinal axis of the body and hence, broadly speak-
ing, are subject to all the same mechanical influences, that we often fail to realize
the importance of a thorough appreciation of the effect of purely mechanical
forces upon an animal which has become fixed or has almost entirely lost the
power of locomotion. But a close study of the mechanical forces which echino-
derms are called upon to meet gives us aclue to the true interpretation of many
features of echinodermal structure which otherwise are quite inexplicable.
For instance, the contour of the rounded body of the urchin is determined not
by any inheritance on the part of the animal from its crustacean prototype, but
by the struggle for supremacy between a constant tendency toward a spherical
form, allowing of the maximum of content within a minimum surface, and a constant
175
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS,
\
YX %
ZN
N OF ZENOMETRA TRISERIALIS FROM THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS, SHOWING THE RELATIVE
Fic. 109.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIME
PROPORTIONS OF THE ARMS,
D CIREL.
PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL, AN’
176 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
tendency toward a flattened disk-like form, giving the maximum resistance to wave
motion and to external influences generally; sometimes one, sometimes the other
of these tendencies gets the upper hand, depending upon the local conditions of the
chosen habitat of the particular type; often the form is modified, as in the so-called
irregular urchins, by the assumption of locomotion in a definite direction, which
immediately results in the elongation of the body in this direction.
The mechanical factors involved in the habit of the stalked crinoids necessitate
LA
ay
PASTE
ar
WEN
7
a
oh
>t 2
me
[>
LJ
we
ie
ry
WAN
i
Li
Ashes
¥,
y
ei
(.\
Pe NEN
Ne
Eze
a
LJ
Ta
woe
WA
Fig. 110.— LATERAL VIEW OF THE PROXI-
MAL PORTION OF A SPECIMEN OF Psa-
THYROMETRA BOREALIS FROM THE
WESTERN ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, SHOW-
ING THE PROPORTIONATE SIZE OF THE
CENTRODORSAL AND ARMS.
the close cohesion of the basals in the form of a closed
ring, so that the infrabasals are permanently divorced
from the radials, the following plates in the ambulacral
series. Similarly response tourgent mechanical exigency
has necessitated the incorporation of the radials (which
correspond to the ambulacrals immediately surrounding
the peristomal in the echinoids) as a closed ring in the
calyx just beyond the basals.
Purely mechanical considerations therefore require
that the dorsal portion of the most primitive crinoid
calyx, which entirely encloses the visceral mass, shall be
composed of closed rings of five plates each, these rings
being two in number, as two rings offer much greater
resistance to outside forces than three or any greater
number. ‘These two rings will be the circlet of radials
upon which the arms are borne, and the circlet of
basals, situated between their bases. The infrabasals,
which lie on the border line between two (half) meta-
meres and are in a way space fillers serving to increase
the area of the apical region, will not appear.
If by any chance circumstances should arise through
which the strict operation of these mechanical laws were
obstructed or held in abeyance we should expect that
at once there would appear in the crinoid calyx addi-
tional plates which, far from being new structures or
structures appearing for the first time, in reality would
be ancient structures long dormant in the crinoid
organization awaiting only the relaxation of the strict
and closely circumscribed mechanical limitations to
reappear in their ancient fashion.
It is not at all inconceivable that a new animal type suddenly called upon to
meet entirely new and very stringent mechanical or ecological conditions, to
respond to mechanical forces entirely different from any which its ancestors have
been called upon to meet in the past, should first appear in a somewhat extreme
form, a form characterized by the complete dominance of the response to the
mechanical or cecological factors involved, coupled with an equally complete reces-
sion of the characters which, through a knowledge of its antecedents, we should
expect it to exhibit; and, later, as a result of the gradual adjustment to the new
EUG
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS.
—_
Fig. 111.— LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF LEPTOMETRA CELTICA FROM THE BAY OF BISCAY, SHOWING THE RELATIVE
PROPORTIONS OF THE ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL AND CIRRI.
178 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
mechanical or cecological conditions, and of the continued pressure of the ancestral
characters, should evince a decided tendency to revert to the latent ancestral type
of structure through which, and not directly from the early type, it finally reaches
its ultimate most highly specialized and perfected condition.
The very simple structure of such types as the Larviformia and Bothriocidaris
does not indicate that they represent the true phylogenetic prototypes from which
all the later crinoids and echinoids have developed, but rather suggests that they
are new and aberrant types in which the sudden and remarkably perfect mechanical
readjustment has for the moment inhibited all inherited tendencies which, however,
will slowly reassert themselves just as soon as they can adapt themselves to the new
mechanical conditions. The Larviformia and Bothriocidaris form the structural
starting point for the crinoids and for the echinoids as we know them; but I believe
that both types are very aberrant, abnormally simplified, if I may so express it,
and therefore give far less accurate a clue to the true affinities and ultimate origin
of their respective groups than do the Flexibilia or the Archeocidaridex of later
occurrence.
Logical and connected proof of this hypothesis is not possible; but many facts
may be found in any group of which we have an adequate knowledge which appear
to substantiate it. For instance, the first cetacean to appear is the Eocene genus
Zeuglodon, which in many ways presents fewer mammalian characters, and cer-
tainly is far more fish-like than any of the latter forms; again, the earliest holo-
thurians of which we have any record, Eldonia, Laggania, and Louisella, are,
superficially at least, much less close to what we commonly regard as the typical
members of the group than the great majority of the subsequent genera.
It was this curious specialization of primitive types through the temporary
dominance of the effect of an entirely new cecological or physical environment which
led me at one time, by a rather natural misinterpretation, to make the statement
that among the crinoids the early forms are phylogenetically no less advanced than
the later.
The calyx plates of the crinoids respond. immediately to any change in the
mechanical forces bearing upon the dorsal cup. A very flexible and yielding column
allows of the retention by the calyx plates of conditions which more or less closely
approximate their original relationships; with increasing rigidity of the column
comes increasing compactness and solidity of the calyx, necessarily accompanied
by increasing reduction of the calyx plates, which eventually culminates in their
almost complete degeneration, so that instead of forming the capsule within which
the visceral mass is situated, and by which it is protected (their original function),
they merely form a small, flat, closely knit platform, upon which the center of the
visceral mass is supported. (For the details of this process see p. 341.)
This condition reaches its extreme development among the comatulids, in many
of which the calyx is so reduced as to serve for little else than a central point for the
attachment of the arms, for the comatulids are attached to the sea bottom or to
objects upon the sea bottom by numerous cirri springing directly from their dorsal
pole, and are therefore the most firmly and immovably fixed of any crinoids.
179
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS.
WU,
(eek rele y
ORMOUSLY
THE EN
NG
112,—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF PEROMETRA DIOMEDE® FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN, SHOWI
Fic.
SYNARTHRIAL TUBERCLES.
DEVELOPED
180 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
The two comatulid genera Marsupites and Uintacrinus illustrate opposite
extremes. In Marsupites (fig. 565, pl. 7) the calyx is of enormous size, with a large
central plate and huge infrabasals. The arms are very short and light, of exactly
the same structure as those of the recent comatulids. Thus in Marsupites we find
the most primitive calyx known of the post-palwozoic type (in which the interradials
and subradials are absent), a mass of thin subequal plates arranged in perfect
pentamerous symmetry and completely enclosing a globular body. The essential
difference between Marsupites and Uintacrinus lies in the enormously elongated arms
of the latter. The strain of these enormous arms upon the plates of the calyx has
been met by the great reduction of the calyx plates and by the incorporation of
numerous additional plates, brachials and pinnulars, in the body wall where they
perform the functions of true calyx plates. The great duplication of sutures, and
consequently of strong ligaments, which form a close network all over the body of
Uintacrinus results in the formation of a strong framework from which the long
arms depend, in the same manner that the car or basket of a spherical balloon is
suspended from the gas bag.
The radials of the crinoids (figs. 2, p. 61, 3, p. 62, 126, p. 195, 128, p. 199, 144,
p- 207, and 145, p. 209) are typically the largest of the plates composing the calyx.
This does not indicate that they are of prime phylogenetical significance, but arises
from causes quite within the phylum.
The interradial plates have become reduced from a long series in each inter-
radius to one in the posterior interradius, which may be followed by a dwarfed
series. The infrabasals and the basals have become very greatly reduced, so
much so that the former commonly, and the latter occasionally, having become
too small for individual occurrence, unite into two pairs, leaving only one in the
original condition of a simple single plate.
The reason for the progressive reduction and increasing compactness lies in
two developmental processes, (1) the progressive fixity of attachment, resulting
in a lessened power of counteracting the effect of external forces by a swaying of
the column, and (2) a progressive increase in the length of the arms, necessitating
a firmer and more compact base. Both of these factors directly affect the radials.
Because of their position as calyx plates they are immediately affected by any
force which acts upon the other calyx plates; and because of their function of
bearing the arms any extension or other growth of these brings upon them an added
strain which they must meet.
First of all they broaden and come into lateral contact, eliminating the inter-
radials and forming a closed ring very closely united with the similar closed ring of
basals below them. This proves sufficient for species with comparatively small,
short arms (see figs. 144, p. 207, and 145, p. 209); but longer arms induce a vertical
enlargement, giving longer apposed sides, and an inward extension, giving much
broader apposed sides, accompanied by an increased recumbency whereby the
basals, also recumbent, become attached to more or less of their dorsal or outer
surface instead of to their proximal edge (see figs. 126, p. 195, and 128, p. 199).
181
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS.
NUS JUNGERSENI FROM ICELAND, SHOWING THE
LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF THAUMATOCRI
Figs. 113-114.—113,
114, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRAL
PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL AND CIRRI.
RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF THE ARMS,
NUS NARESI FROM THE EAST INDIES.
PORTION OF A SPECIMEN OF THAUMATOCRI
182 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Thus the radials, originally only the basal plates of the arms, gradually become
incorporated into the calyx and, increasing at the expense of the other plates, finally
become practically the whole calyx in themselves.
In certain crinoids, as in the comatulids and in the pentacrinites, the calyx has
become so reduced that it serves merely as a platform upon which the central part
of the visceral mass rests, this being chiefly supported by the arm bases. (Compare
fig. 145, p. 209, with 85, p. 139, 89, p. 147, 92, p. 151, 113, p. 181, and 119, p. 185; see
fig. 74, p. 127). In these forms there is no differentiation of the anal interradius or
of the right posterior ray so far as the calyx is concerned, though the anal area on
the disk is always enlarged, sometimes, as in certain comasterids, occupying prac-
tically its entire surface. The calyx plates, here reduced to a small platform sup-
porting merely the central portion of the almost completely exposed visceral mass,
are no longer subject to any stress from the pressure exerted by the constant
movements of the distal end of the digestive tube, these being compensated, as in
the holothurians, by the pliant body wall; and therefore those in and to the right
of the posterior interradius, obeying the reductive influence which, as a result of
the radial symmetry, is exactly equal in all the radii, are reduced to exactly the
same degree as are all the others.
It has already been remarked that in a radially symmetrical animal divided
by lines of weakness the body would naturally be expected to consist of an uneven
number of segments so that none of the lines of weakness will pass directly through
the animal in the same plane. The number five represents the optimum number of
divisions for such an animal. It was probably the coincidence of this number
with the five segments usually incorporated in the crustacean thorax which originally
permitted the formation of the echinoderms from the primitive crustacean ancestors.
I have noticed that in the dead and slightly shrunken embryos of a species
of salamander (Amblystoma punctatum) which came under my observation the body
wall on the convex (unpigmented) side was cracked, and that the cracks were more
or less regularly arranged, so that there were formed one subpentagonal central
area surrounded by five subequal similar areas, the general appearance being the
same as that of Marsupites viewed dorsally. This could have been nothing but
the result of mechanical processes.
In a spicule forming skeleton like that of the echinoderms mechanical con-
siderations will sometimes produce radical changes in the shape and arrangement
of the plates even after they have become, through long existence as phylogenetic
entities, of primary importance, and may result in their more or less permanent
disintegration in certain groups or sections of groups, so that they may never
appear in the ontogeny or in the perfect animal except as a mass of smaller plates
or of scattered spicules.
Such conditions obtain in those crinoids which possess three instead of the
more common five basals or infrabasals; these three basals or infrabasals are col-
lectively the equivalent of the usual five; but, except in particular cases, we are not
justified in saying or assuming that any one of these three is the exact equivalent
of any one or two of the pentamerous series.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 183
Earliest crinoids.
The study of the true significance of the various structures possessed by the
recent crinoids necessitated a similar study of the same structures in many fossil
Fig, 115.
Figs. 115-118.—115, LATERAL VIEW OF A YOUNG SPECIMEN OF THAUMATOCRINUS RENOVATUS FROM SOUTH OF AUSTRALIA; THE
RAYIN THE FOREGROUND IS THE LEFT P¢ )STERIOR (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 116, LATERAL VIEW OF A YOUNG SPECIMEN
OF THAUMATOCRINUS RENOVATUS FROM SOUTH CF AUSTRALIA, SHOWING, IN THE CENTER, THE ANALINTERRADIUS AND THE
ANAL PROCESS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 117, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRAL PORTION OF A YOUNG SPECIMEN OF THAU-
MATOCRINUS RENOVATUS FROM SOUTH OF AUSTRALIA, SHOWING THE LARGE ORALS, THE PLATING OF THE DISK BEYOND THE
ORALS, THEINTERRADIALS, AND THE ANAL PROCESS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 118, LATERAL VIEW OF A YOUNG SPECIMEN
or THAUMATOCRINUS RENOVATUS FROM SOUTH OF AUSTRALIA; THE RAY IN THE FOREGROUND IS THE LEFT ANTERIOR (AFTER
P. H. CARPENTER).
types, and the further this study progressed the more it was impressed upon me
that the paleontological succession of crinoid types is not at all to be trusted in
matters of crinoid phylogeny, except possibly on the basis of broad averages.
184 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Phylogenetic facts must be acquired through the study of the comparative
anatomy of the group, combined with the study of the embryology and later
development; later they may be tested in the light of the paleontological record
if one so desires.
In every group of animals we must be very careful how we apply the data
gained from the paleontological record, and in no group is this care more necessary
than in the crinoids.
The earliest crinoids present many characters which are highly specialized,
and in general this specialization is along quite different lines from the specialization
in recent forms. Upon careful analysis they reduce themselves to a basic type
characterized by (1) a uniform cylindrical column of continuous growth; (2) a very
large calyx with an enlarged and asymmetrical anal area, including one or more
extra plates, and with a subradial plate beneath the right posterior radial; and
(3) short biserialarms. The post-paleozoic crinoids, excepting the Encrinide, upon
careful analysis reduce themselves to a basic type characterized by (1) a column
possessing a definite limit of growth and terminated proximally by a specialized
columnal with more or less of the character of a calyx plate; (2) a greatly reduced
and perfectly symmetrical calyx with no additional plates in the anal area and no
subradials; and (3) very long uniserial arms. In all three of these characters the
earlier crinoids are much more primitive than the later.
The phylogenetic history of the crinoids, in agreement with the paleontological
record and with the ontogeny, indicates that there has been a progressive and
rapid decrease in the size of the visceral mass, correlated with a proportionate
increase in the size and length of the arms. This reduction in the size of the vis-
ceral mass, and of the calyx plates, resulted in the eventual elimination from the
calyx of the subradials and of the interradials, leaving it composed only of the
infrabasals, basals and radials, while in the phylogenetically most advanced types
even the infrabasals, and in some extreme cases the basals also, have become meta-
morphosed or disappeared, so that the calyx is composed of radials only.
We can not reconstruct the ancestral crinoid type from what we actually find
in the paleozoie rocks, for every paleozoic form is specialized in at least a minority
of its characters. For instance, in certain forms, in other ways possessing a com-
paratively high degree of specialization, the visceral mass has retained more or less
its primitive large size, so that we find the radianal (the right posterior subradial)
repeated under one or more, sometimes under all, of the other radials, as in For-
besiocrinus; while among the paleozoic forms the majority possess a very primitive
type of column though there are several noteworthy exceptions, as for instance,
Platycrinus (fig. 516, pl. 1); many possess the primitive biserial type of arm, and a
few possess a very primitive type of calyx usually, however, combined with a
specialized type of arm.
We must therefore reach our conclusions by a careful process of deduction,
and the result, arrived at through a critical study of the data presented by the
palozoic and later species, and especially by a study of the development and
morphology of the recent types, gives us an organism which, though closely ap-
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 185
proached by certain palsozoic species, differs from them in many details of general
structure.
Very possibly the most primitive type of crinoid existed in the palxozoic
along with the types which have come down to us as fossils in the rocks; but, as the
remarkable density of the crinoid skeleton is a feature developed within and char-
F1g. 119.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF PENTAMETROCRINUS VARIANS FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN, SHOWING
THE RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF THE ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL, AND CIRRIL
acteristic of the group, they were undoubtedly small and delicate creatures with
a very poor chance for preservation.
Exactly the same was the case with the primitive birds. They were un-
doubtedly, judging from all the evidence at hand, small and arboreal, not large
and terrestrial, and therefore stood almost no chance of ever being preserved.
13
79146°—Bull, 82—15
186 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Blastoids.
In the blastoids we find the entire body enclosed within a capsule formed by
plates all of which are comparable to plates arising in the dorsal body wall of the
crinoids. The radials of the blastoids grow forward on either side so that the
ambulacrals are developed within a furrow formed between their two branches. No
perisomic surface is exposed.
While in the blastoids the development of the visceral mass and of the external
skeleton is equally balanced so that the latter always completely encloses the former,
in the ecrinoids quite different conditions obtain. At first the development is
similar; but in the crinoids the development of the calyx plates is abruptly arrested
while the visceral mass continues its growth.
It is necessary for the ambulacral plates, represented by the third and follow-
ing brachials in the crinoids, always to maintain the same relationship with the
ventral ambulacral structures. In the blastoids the ambulacrals grow over and
cover in the ventral ambulacral structures, new plates being continually formed
near the ventral apex. In the ecrinoids they are turned outward and form a support
over the ventral surface of which the ambulacral structures run.
But in the crinoids the visceral mass grows so fast that the ambulacral plates
or brachials, necessarily permanently attached to the edge of the ventral disk,
become widely separated from the radials by an area of naked perisome. This
naked perisome, belonging to the primarily skeleton forming dorsal surface, sup-
ports caleareous plates which form connecting bands between the radials and the
proximal ambulacrals.
The presence of this series of plates intermediate in character and in position
between the radials and the ambulacrals (which eventually come to form the division
series and first two brachials) and the turning outward of the latter are the essential
differences between the blastoids and the crinoids.
In the urchins the external portion of the test is formed entirely by the small
apical system and plates comparable to the division series and first two brachials
of the crinoids, with the radials represented as 10 ambulacral plates around the
peristome. True ambulacrals, comparable to the ambulacrals of the blastoids and
to the arm ossicles of the crinoids from the third brachial outward, are represented
by the auricles and by the complicated dental pyramids, while the so-called ambu-
lacrals are not true ambulacrals at all, but are plates developed in the intermediate
perisomic area between the plates of the apical system and the base of the true
ambulacrals, which correspond to the plates proximal to the radials in the crinoids.
It is because of the fact that the so called ambulacrals of the urchins are not
true ambulacrals of the type seen in the blastoids at all, but merely pseudo-ambu-
lacrals developed originally as space fillers, that in many types they are multi-
columnar. True ambulacrals are from the very nature of their origin invariable
biserial or secondarily monoserial.
The blastoids are essentially imperfect, or, more properly speaking, too perfect
crinoids, and in a sense they are remotely intermediate between the crinoids and
the echinoids. They possess the characteristic structures of crinoids, yet their
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 187
plates form a solid capsule about the body which is even more perfectly developed
than that about the body of the urchins.
They possess a crinoid-like column; the base is composed of three plates
beyond which are five large plates, each with a narrow (becoming broader with
SPP SSa
7
Vee
\
Fic, 120.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF PENTAMETROCRINUS DIOMEDEX FROM SOUTHWESTERN JAPAN, SHOWING THE
RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF THE ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL, AND CIRRI.
increasing specialization) cleft down the center occupied by a double row of small
plates; in the five interambulacral areas about the mouth are five angular plates
of moderate size.
The three large apical plates correspond to the five basals of the crinoids, and
to the five genitals of the urchins; infrabasals and oculars are not represented.
188 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
The large ‘forked plates” correspond to the radials of the erinoids (including
the axillaries, which morphologically are reduplicated radials), and to the 10
so-called ambulacrals which are the first to be formed in the echinoids.
The plates within the central furrows of the forked plates correspond to the
brachials of the crinoids (except the first two), and to the auricles and plates of the
dental pyramids of the urchins.
The five plates about the ventral apex correspond to the orals of the crinoids and
have no counterparts in the urchins.
The blastoids resemble the echinoids in having the ambulacral structures
drawn out into five long narrow lines extending toward the apical pole and covered
by a double row of simuar small plates, which, however, are not in any way homol-
ogous with the plates of the echinoids which occur in the same situation.
In very small specimens the forked plates scarcely differ in shape from the
typical crinoid radials, there being merely a slight concavity in the distal border.
The central portion of the plate ceases to extend itself ventrally, but the sides become
enormously produced, inclosing the ambulacrals as they are formed.
The forked plate represents the crinoid radial and the entire series of so-called
ambulacrals of the echinoid. The first two ambulacrals formed in the concavity
on its distal edge, lying side by side, are therefore identical in position with the
auricles of the echinoids, and form a circlet of 10 plates arranged in pairs just
beyond the radials (or ambulacral series). Instead of being wholly internal like
the auricles, or of extending themselves outward and away from the body like the
crinioid brachials, these plates lie in the body wall flush with the forked plates, just
as do the entirely different echinoid ambulacrals.
In the echinoids the radial processes from the various circumoral systems are
more or less attached to the distal portion of the ocular plates; with the growth of
the test these radial ambulacral processes become drawn out, and are continually
being covered, as necessity requires, by a continuous formation of new plates at the
distal border of the oculars. The first two plates formed (comparable to the forked
plate of the blastoids and to the radial of the crinoids) always maintain their original
position on the edge of the peristome, with the circlet of auricles and dependent
plates just within them.
In the blastoids the ocular plates are absent, and the radial processes from
the various cireumoral systems are attached to the distal portion of the radial
plate instead. But this amounts to the same thing, for in both cases these proc- .
esses are attached to the distal border of the first radially situated plate. As the
animal grows the ambulacral processes are drawn backward down the sides
exactly as in the echinoids.
The forked plate represents the entire ambulacral series of the echinoids, and
the radials, including the axillaries, of the crinoids; on its distal border are two
little plates similar to the auricles of the echinoids. Now the auricles of the
echinoids may be elongated by the addition of new plates to their distal (ventral)
ends; similarly in the blastoids the small plates within the concavity of the distal
border of the radials, on drawing away from the ventral apex of the animal, con-
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 189
tinuously add new plates to the series between the ventral apex and the plates
already formed.
In the crinoids exactly the same formation of new plates occurs; but there
is no drawing down of the radial ambulacral processes toward the dorsal pole;
hence these plates turn outward and as they form give rise to long arms, at first
biserial and later becoming uniserial, bearing the ambulacral processes on their
ventral surface.
Fig. 121.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF PENTAMETROCRINUS TUBERCULATUS FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN, SHOWING THE
RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF THE ARMS, PINNULES, CENTRODORSAL, AND CIRRI.
Nervous system.
In the nervous system of the arthropods there is always a certain amount of
fusion of ganglia, which becomes more marked in the more specialized types; in
the crabs the ventral chain is represented by a lobed ganglionic mass in the thorax
connected with a mere rudiment which corresponds to the abdominal portion of
the cord in the more elongate decapods. In the decapods the number of fully
190 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
developed lobes in this lobed ganglionic mass is five on either side of the thorax,
each of the five corresponding to one of the large ambulatory appendages. In
the crinoids an identical lobed ganglionic mass occurs which also consists of five
lobes and represents one-half of the lobed ganglionic mass in the decapods.
In the primitive crustacea there are two parallel nerve cords running along
the ventral surface of the body from the subesophageal ganglion, which are con-
nected at intervals by transverse commissures. The five primary nerves in the
crinoids immediately upon leaving the central nerve mass divide into two which,
like the ventral nerves of the primitive crustacea, are connected at intervals by
commissures. In the decephalized crinoids each of the five primary nerves repre-
sents one of the five nerves leading to the ambulatory appendages in the decapods;
but the replacement of the anteroposterior elongation of the body as seen in the
crustacea by an enormous (now radial) development of each of the five half
metameres of which the crinoid body is composed has been accompanied by the
projection upon each of the five nerve cords running to the five (half) metameric
divisions of more or less of the characteristics of the entire crustacean ventral
nerve cord.
Eye.
The eye in asteroids is a modified tentacle bearing numerous little cups lined
by sensitive and pigmented cells containing clear fluid and covered by cuticle;
the tentacle itself is a degenerate or very highly specialized appendage which
originally corresponded to the metameric appendages of the crustaceans. The
replacement of an excised stalked crustacean eye by an antenna suggests that the
stalk of the crustacean eye may be in reality originally a metameric appendage;
if this be so the correspondence between the crustacean and asteroid eye is most
remarkable.
Sensory setx. .
The sensory sete of the crustaceans are possibly represented by the sensory
set on the tentacles of the crinoids.
Excretory organs.
Well-defined excretory organs homologous with the nephridia of the annelids
do not occur in the echinoderms; the excretory organs in the crustaceans are
localized and segregated, being represented as ‘‘green glands’’ behind the base of
each of the antenne.
Genital ducts.
In the crayfish (Astacus) the genital ducts open to the exterior through the
protopodite of the thoracic legs, of the last pair in the male, and of the second
ambulatory pair in the female; in the echinoids they open through pores in the
genital plates which represent the protopodites of the thoracic legs in the crustaceans.
Celom.
In the crustaceans the true or primitive ccelom is always small in the adults,
and the apparent body cavity is of secondary origin, possessing in a great part a
blood carrying or vascular function. In the echinoderms the true or primitive
ceelom forms (1) the water vascular canals and (2) the true celom.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 191
Promachocrinus and Thaumatocrinus.
The calyx of the pentacrinoid larva of Promachocrinus is very robust, more so
than that of any other comatulid, and is characterized by pronouncedly convex
Fig. 122.—LATERAL VIEW OF A YOUNG SPECIMEN OF PENTAMETROCRINUS, SP. FROM ICELAND, SHOWING THE RELATIONSHIPS OF
THE CENTRODORSAL, BASALS, RADIALS, AND INTERRADIALS, AND THE PERISOMIC PLATES OF THE DISK.
sides and great breadth across the radials. This is probably due to a more than
usually rapid growth of the internal organs, intensified by a diminution in the rapid-
ity of the growth of the calyx plates resulting from the coldness of its habitat.
192 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
At the time the internal organs begin to exhibit this excess of growth over the
external skeletal system the basals have more or less ceased developing, and have
leaned so far outward that the mechanical stress of this excess growth falls entirely
upon the radials.
In the comatulids the radials are greatly reduced, and the gradual cessation of
their development begins not long after the same thing has commenced to become
evident in the basals. Thus in Pro-
machocrinus the radials are unable,
through incipient cessation of develop-
ment, to grow laterally and to occupy
the vacant spaces left by the spreading
outward of the radial circlet as a result
of the excess of growth of the visceral
mass; but these spaces, exposing peri-
some belonging to the skeleton forming
dorsal body wall, become at once occu-
pied by narrow plates, which rapidly
increase in width as the spreading apart
of the radials progresses.
The water vascular system is pri-
marily a ventral system; it is thus pre-
pared to send an extension at once into,
or to be drawn out with, any process
arising from the dorsoventral margin.
Along with the water tubes the am-
bulacral grooves and the subambulacral
nerves always take advantage of any
extension of the perisomic surface and
at once extend themselves over it.
Evidence of this is seen at all points
where the arms branch.
It is therefore to be expected that
if the skeleton forming dorsal surface
of the animal gives rise to interradial
Fig. 123.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF ATELECRINUS processes resembling the radial proc-
SULCATUS FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, SHOWING THE esses, the ventral structures will make
gray pss as 0 THE LREOWS PEIING exactly the samo use of them that they
did originally of the radial processes.
It might be expected that the ambulacral systems would extend themselves
upon the ventral surface of the interradial arms by forming interradial buds, as
they do in the case of their radial extensions. But they do not do this. Dorsally
the five supernumerary radials and post-radial series of Promachocrinus and Thau-
matocrinus are truly interradial so far as the skeleton is concerned. Ventrally
each of the post-radial series derives its ambulacral structures not from the center
of the interradial portion of the cireumcsophageal structures opposite it, but from
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 193
the large radial branches already existing leading to the radial post-radial- series
situated just to the left. The dorsal nerves of the interradial radials and arms are
derived from the same sources.
Thus while the skeletal elements forming the interradial radials and: arms in
Thaumatocrinus and Promachocrinus are truly interradial from the very first, all
the other elements in their composition are derived by a branching of the elements
leading to the radial radials and arms to their left. It follows, therefore, that the inter-
radial radials and arms of these two genera are primarily twinned reduplications
of the equivalent radial series to the left, and must be regarded as having exactly
the same relationship with the radial series to their left as the two arms of each arm
pair in Antedon have with each other, each of the five infrabasals of Promachocrinus
(and presumably also of Thawmatocrinus) standing in exactly the same relationship
Fig. 124. Fig. 125
Figs. 124-125.—124, LATERAL VIEW OF THE PROXIMAL PORTION OF A SPECIMEN OF ATELECRINUS BALANOIDES FROM BARRA GRANDE
CUBA, SHOWING THE BASALS (AFTER P, H, CARPENTER). 125, LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF ATELECRINUS WYVILLD
FROM FIJI, SHOWING THE GREATLY REDUCED BASALS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
with the paired ambulacral series as the five axillaries do to the ten arms of Antedon,
though not, on account of mechanical considerations, quite comparable in relative
position.
This gives us another reason for regarding the infrabasals as the true st arting
point of the radial series in the crinoids, and for regarding the radials as quite com-
parable to axillaris. The radial pairs of Promachocrinus and of Thaumatocrinus
(the primary radials and the interradial radials to their right) should probably
each be regarded as the equivalent of an axillary which is unable to appear as an
axillary for the reason that the radials are closely crowded into a closed ring, and the
separation of the following series necessitated by the formation of an axillary at
any point is here rendered impossible.
Thus Promachocrinus and Thaumatocrinus may be described as comatulids
with five doubled radial series, in which the skeleton of the five later series arises
194 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
interradially, but the other systems of these series are derived by a division of the
five original series.
CALCAREOUS STRUCTURES.
Skeleton as a whole.
For convenience the crinoid skeleton is treated under three separate heads, as
follows:
(1) The primary or appendicular skeleton.—This is frequently referred to
merely as the Skeleton; under this heading are included the calyx plates (with
the column), the orals, and the articulated series of ossicles which form the supports
of the cirri, arms and pinnules.
Among the recent crinoids these ossicles (usually, however, excepting the
orals) have always been considered as forming a convenient unit. P. H. Carpenter
was accustomed to refer to them as composing the Radial skeleton, and he defined
this radial skeleton as consisting of ‘‘successive joints and rods which are developed
in a longitudinal direction, and are united to one another by articulation or suture.”
The uniformity of structure throughout this skeletal system was thus attested by
W. B. Carpenter: ‘‘The component pieces of which the skeleton of Antedon is made
up, alike in its adult condition and in every previous phase of its existence, present a
remarkable accordance with each other in elementary structure, consisting through-
out of that calcareous reticulation—formed by the calcification of an animal basis
that seems nothing else than non-differentiated sareode—which I have shown to be
the essential constituent of the skeleton in every type of the class Echinoderma.
The character of this reticulation is best seen either in very thin sections of any
part of the skeleton, or in that curiously inflected cribriform lamina which I have
termed the rosette. This is the only part of the skeleton of the adult Antedon in
which the reticulation lies all in one plane; but * * * even its most solid por-
tions * * * make their first appearance in the same form of cribiform lamelle;
and whilst these lamelle increase in superficial dimensions by the extension of the
reticulation from their margins, they are augmented in thickness also by an exten-
sion of the reticulation from their inner surfaces into the animal basis in which
they are embedded. When a portion of the skeleton, either from a fresh or from
a spirit specimen, is subjected to the action of dilute nitric or hydrochloric acid,
by which the calcareous network is dissolved away, a continuous film of pellucid
sarcodic substance is left, presenting no other trace of structure than in being
studded at regular intervals with minute granular spots.”
In the young of certain comatulids, as, for instance, in the young of Thawmato-
crinus (figs. 115-118, p. 183), the disk becomes invested with a pavement of large
plates, which become resorbed and disappear before or shortly after the loss of the
larval column. These plates are entirely different from the secondary perisomic
plates which are developed at a much later stage, and represent the condition from
which the enormously specialized dome of the Camerata was developed. These
should be regarded as primary plates, though not always occurring in the young;
if present at all they appear and disappear again in a very short space of time.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 195
(2) The secondary or perisomic skeleton.—This consists of the side and covering
plates, the plates of the disk (excepting the orals), and of the brachial perisome,
and the numerous minute plates and spicules mostly lying toward the inner side
of the soft integument, ordinarily more or less iso-
lated, but sometimes slightly connected by strands )
of connective tissue. gf
The perisomic plates of the so-called secondary
series differ from the primary plates, among other
ways, in possessing great variability, or exhibiting an
absence of fixity, in their shape and in the method
and manner of their occurrence; in other words, they
are directly dependent upon local mechanical condi-
tions, while the phylogenetically significant primary
plates, originally just as dependent upon local me-
chanical conditions, have, through long existence as
integral units, attained a distinct entity of their own,
which is to a certain degree dominant over the me-
chanics of their immediate surroundings.
Among the recent crinoids the interradials (and
the radianal) are, through degeneration, somewhat
intermediate in character between this series andthe &
one preceding; the well-developed plates on the disks &
of the young of the various comasterids and of Thau- ©
matocrinus which are resorbed before the adult condi- See
a B 2 a tn $i}
tion is attained, also show in many ways an approach Bee
to the secondary type of plate. ze Ke
There has usually been made a considerable Sas
difference between primary and secondary plates, YON
i
Dg
MG
but in reality no definite line of differentiation
exists; both types grade into each other, and the &
primary plates are only a small phylogenetic step S
in advance of those of the perisomic series though,
it must be confessed, in most cases distinct enough
in the adults of the recent forms.
The more important plates of the secondary
series from a systematic standpoint are the side and
covering plates, the plates developed on the ventral
surface of the disk, and the plates developed on the
sides of the disk between the postradial series.
(3) The visceral skeleton.—This term is used to 1. 126.—Larenat view oF THE CROWN
denote the numerous spicules and networks of lime- oy turocnmnes srmmorat Pmowt. tHe
stone which, as described by P. H. Carpenter and — Laccavrve Istanps, sHowine THE RE-
others, occur more or less plentifully in the bands of — (AZOSARPS OF THE Basans; Rapes
connective tissue that traverse the visceral mass
and in the walls of the digestive canal; these spicules grade insensibly into the
perisomic type, so that in effect the visceral skeleton is merely that part of the
perisomic skeleton which is developed within the body.
PNT —
TAROT rte =
Ky f
iat
CN
SINS
e, it
%
tet
Ry
a
t
if
y
Ry
$
aad
whl
os
SS
MH
a
Lee
A
ck
Sein
yh B
SL
—- ‘5
196 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Systematically the primary skeleton is of by far the greatest importance; the
secondary skeleton in certain cases is of very great importance, though usually it
is negligible, except for the fact of its non-development; the visceral skeleton has
never bean employed for systematic purposes, but much more study is needed
before we can say that it presents no characters of value.
The crinoidal skeleton is formed by a calcareous deposit about or within cer-
tain tissues or organs without any material change in the latter, and calcareous
deposits are found to a greater or lesser degree throughout the organization of the
animals wherever their presence would not.be detrimental to the general welfare.
The walls of the digestive tube, the mesenteries, and the entire ventral body cover-
ing are all more or less calcified, in addition to the large and definite plates included
in the cirri, calyx, stem, arms and pinnules.
This is strikingly illustrated in specimens of recent species where no lime has
been deposited in the pinnules or in the distal part of the arm (see fig. 75, p. 128);
such individuals appear perfectly able to perform their natural functions, though
their appendages are but vaguely divided into segments, and are superficially only
comparable to the tentacles of jelly-fish.
As is well stated by Carpenter, the component pieces of the crinoid skeleton
consist of a calcareous reticulation formed by the calcification of an organic proto-
plasmic basis in which numerous nuclei and pigment granules are embedded. This
nuclear tissue is in the form of a network around the meshes of which the caleareous
material is deposited. The character of the calcareous reticulation varies greatly
in different parts of the animal, being much closer at the synostoses and at the
syzygies and at the articular surfaces than in the interior of the segments. This is
at once evident on examination of a longitudinal section of an arm, pinnule or cirrus,
the central portion being more or less translucent and the ends chalky white. In
many forms the closeness of the calcareous reticulation at the distal ends of the
segments results in the more or less complete elimination of pigment from the
immediate vicinity of the articulations, so that they stand out white against a dark
background and give a banded appearance to the arms, pinnules or cirri. This
dense end deposit in the various articulating segments, induced by mechanical con-
siderations incident to the exigencies of oscillating motion, does not form a layer
of uniform thickness as might be expected, but it takes the form of a cylindrical
lens the axis of which is parallel to the fulcral ridge of the joint face adjacent,
beneath which the greatest thickness lies. The fulcral ridges themselves are more
dense than any other part of the joint surface, especially the summit, which usually
stands out prominently as a vitreous line along an opaque chalky ridge. In the
case of synostoses, or of other unions which allow of no specialized motion, the
denser layers of the neighboring segments are of uniform thickness and no areas
of maximum density occur. Here also the difference between the periphery and
the center of the ossicles is usually not so marked, the structure being much more
uniform than in the segments between which directive motion takes place.
In the fully developed Antedon bifida W. B. Carpenter found that the sarcodic
base substance of the brachials forms a mere shell, scarcely any trace of it being
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 197
discoverable in the interspace system of the central part of the calcareous reticu-
lation.
There is among the crinoids, as in other animals, a pronounced lack of corre-
lation in the comparative development of the several organs and structures, and
also in the cessation of development consequent on incipient senescence. The most
striking presentment of this is in regard to the skeletal system. In the early post-
X o
», SO
~ LY
\, DO
\ =
\ eo
accor, » 2
TQ \\ (TT DE A ht) ih see
“\ LY
~
Fig. 127.—UPPER MIDDLE PORTION OF THE COLUMN OF A SPECIMEN OF TELIOCRINUS SPRINGERI FROM THE WEST COAST OF
INDIA, SHOWING THE CIRRI ARRANGED IN REGULAR WHORLS ON THE NODALS, WHICH ARE SEPARATED BY A CONSTANT
NUMBER OF INTERNODALS.
larval stages this shows a very considerable advance over the other body elements;
but it never attains a fixed maturity. All through the life of the animal it continues
to develop by accretion and by resorption, and the arms, except in rare cases, con-
tinue to add terminal segments until death occurs. After the adult stage is reached,
however, change takes place very slowly, and at a constantly diminishing rate. It
is mainly evidenced by an increase in the size and in the solidarity of the compo-
nent elements, which gives old animals a peculiarly robust and rugged appearance.
198 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
The addition of brachials distally after maturity is so slow that the general pro-
portions of the arm length to the other dimensions is not appreciably altered.
For purposes of description a crinoid may be conveniently considered as made
up of calcareous ossicles and ‘‘soft parts.” To be exact, a crinoid should be consid-
ered as having no ‘‘hard parts,” for the inorganic elements are not deposited in a
specially differentiated and localized matrix, but make their appearance anywhere.
It is not always easy to decide whether certain organs should be included under the
head of caleareous or of noncaleareous components of the crinoid whole. Such
organs I have associated with others of an equivalent systematic value rather than
with those of similar morphological significance.
In a very large 10-armed comatulid in which side and covering plates are
developed there are visible externally about 600,000 distinct skeletal elements,
each of which arises from a separate center of ossification; of these about 87,000
belong to the primary and about 513,000 to the secondary or perisomic skeletal
series. Ina large comasterid with no side and covering plates developed there may
be as many as 700,000 primary skeletal elements visible, while in the very small
antedonids the number probably never falls below 10,000. The greatest of these
figures is insignificant, however, when compared with the number of ossicles in the
larger pentacrinites where, in the recent species, nearly 24 millions are found.
These figures, large as they are, must be approximately doubled when the internal
skeleton is taken into consideration.
Column.
Except for the short period during which the animals are free-swimming cili-
ated bilaterally symmetrical larve, the young of all recent comatulids so far as
known are, until a considerable size is reached, attached to the sea floor or to other
organisms by a slender column of essentially the same type as that found in the
species of the family Bourgueticrinide (figs. 532, 533, pl. 3, and 543, pl. 4).
This column varies very greatly in its proportionate length and in the relative
proportions and number of its component segments, as will be explained in detail
in the section dealing with the Pentacrinoid Larve.
The column of the crinoids as a whole is the equivalent, collectively as well as
in each individual segment, of the central or suranal plate of the echinoids in which
such a plate is developed (fig. 71, p. 127), and of all the small plates of the peri-
proctal area taken together in the echinoids in which no central or suranal plate
occurs (fig. 72, p. 127); speaking more broadly the crinoid column is the equivalent
of a crustacean cephalothoracic appendage, or a group of five such appendages.
The central or suranal plate of the echinoids is not, like the plates of the coronal
ring, an element of fundamental phylogenetical significance; but it represents the
resultant from the coalition of numerous small plates and spicules of the periproctal
area, a coalition which has taken place within the class at a comparatively late
phylogenetic stage and does not occur in the earlier forms.
The central plate of the echinoids within that group is purely a secondary
plate, confined to the later and more specialized types, in which it is of somewhat
irregular occurrence and of equally irregular morphological value.
Se
199
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS.
mo
m tr
AACE Ceo
SER Se TTI RASS
TE REE SOS STL
ALU
THE COLUMN, THOUGH NOT THE END (@), THE CENTRAL PORTION OF THE COLUMN (6), AND THE PROXIMAL PORTION OF THE
Fig. 128.—A SPECIMEN OF PROISOCRINUS RUBERRIMUS FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, SHOWING THE DISTAL PORTION OF
COLUMN AND THE CROWN (c).
200 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
The ancestral crinoid was developmentally and phylogenetically parallel to
such of the later echinoids as possess a well-developed central plate, as well as com-
pound ambulacrals and well developed auricles.
The inversion of the crinoid as compared with the echinoid brought the central
plate into contact with the sea floor and, the central plate being a secondary peri-
somic structure, and therefore an inert calcareous element of great potential varia-
bility the shape and thickness of which are in no way confined within narrow
limits by physiological, mechanical or phylogenetic limitations, it became attached
to the sea floor by a simple increase in thickness.
The facility with which organisms with calcareous skeletons belonging to
normally free groups become attached is well illustrated in many diverse molluscan
families, among the barnacles, the foraminifera, and numerous other classes of
animals, all of which furnish cases strictly parallel to what we find in the crinoids
among the echinoderms.
Attached by the central plate, our theoretical ancestal crinoid has two possible
courses to follow: (1) It may increase the area of its attached base, or (2) it may
increase its thickness, thus forming a column.
Among the recent forms the first possibility is realized through reversion in the
young of Holopus as figured by Mr. Alexander Agassiz (fig. 514, pl. 1); the base has
spread out enormously so that the animal presents a striking similarity to certain
low species of sessile barnacles, the ten arms being countersunk, as it were, in a
depression at the apex of a broad low truncated cone. The second possibility is
exemplified among recent forms by the adult Holopus (fig. 517, pl. 1); the base,
instead of further spreading out, gradually becomes thickened, so that the animal
is raised up for a considerable distance on a thick stalk.
The attachment of Holopus, incidentally, is singularly suggestive in reference
to the question of the phylogeny of the crinoids, and therefore of the echinoderms in
general. All the evidence—anatomical, structural, and embryological—points to
their having derived from a generalized phyllopod crustacean ancester through the
barnacles, just beyond which they find their logical position. In the young Holopus
we find duplicated the attachment characteristic of the sessile barnacles, while in
the adult we find the typical attachment of the stalked barnacles.
Now a rigid calcareous stalk like that of Holopus is limited in its availability
for elongation; if it should grow to more than three or four times as long as the
minimum diameter, it would rapidly become exceedingly brittle and liable to fracture
by the contact of the animal with other organisms, or even from the effect of wave
motion.
There are, again, two possible lines of development: (1) The animal may break
off and thus secondarily become free, or (2) the column may break in so far as the
calcareous substance is concerned, yet remain in continuity through the organic
base, thus developing an articulation which would admit of a very considerable
additional elongation—at least double that permitted by the original column.
Such a fracture of the column must not be regarded as an actual physical
fracture, but as a morphological fracture induced during the development of the
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 201
¥ NAUMACHOCRINUS HAWAMENSIS FROM KAUAI, HAWAMAN ISLANDS, SHOWINGT HE VARIATION IN THE
AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CALYX AND THE COLUMN; THE ARMS BEYOND THE FIRST
M PLATE, ARE LACKING; (@) THE DISTAL PORTION OF THE COLUMN; (b) THE PROXIMAL
Fia. 129.—A SPECIMEN 0
TYPE OF THE COLUMNALS,
PRIMIBRACH, AND THE TERMINAL STE
PORTION OF THE COLUMN AND THE CALYX.
79146°—Bull. 82—15 14
202 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
rigid column, and not accomplished after the calcareous deposition has been com-
pleted and the rigid character attained.
No recent crinoids are known in which the first line of development obtains;
but it is well illustrated by the fossil genus Edriocrinus. No crinoids are known
in which the column is composed simply of two columnals, as would be the case in
the first stage in the second line of development. But suppose we carry this line
further; we have a crinoid attached by a column in which an articulation has been
developed in the center; such an articulation would of necessity develop a fulcral
ridge running across the joint faces and embracing the central canal, admitting of
motion in a single plane, coinciding with that in which the original stimulus deter-
mining the fracture was received. Stem growth would continue; but as new
deposition occurs only just under the calyx, only the proximal columnal would
increase in length. Soon the proximal columnal would become so long as to become
brittle, as did the original stem, and fracture would again occur midway between
the first articulation and the calyx. Now, this fracture would almost certainly
differ from the original fracture in being formed at right angles to it, for any force
exerted in the same plane as that which caused the original fracture would be taken
up by the articulation which has formed; but, owing to the definite direction of,
and the close union along, the fuleral ridge, any force coming parallel to the fulcral
ridge—that is, at right angles to the original foree—would meet with resistance, as
for a force exerted in this direction the original articulation would be practically
nonexistent, and a second fracture would occur in the weakest spot; namely, half
way between the original articulation and the calyx, developing into a second
articulation in which the fulcral ridge would run at right angles to the direction
taken by that of the first. A still further increase in stem length would mean a
progressive increase in the number of articulations, each of which would, in the
direction taken by its fulcral ridge, alternate with those on either side; and thus
would eventually be formed the primitive polycolumnar crinoid stem, a stem
exactly comparable to the stem of Rhizocrinus (figs. 135, 137, p. 205), Bathycrinus
(fig. 527, pl. 2), and the young of the comatulids (figs. 407, p. 317, 532, 533, pl. 3).
Although the origin of the polycolumnar crinoid stem appears undoubtediy to
to have been from a single original calyx plate, a centrale corresponding to the
centrale in Marsupites (fig. 565, pl. 7) or in Uintacrinus (fig. 572, pl. 7) and to the
central plate of certain echinoids, it does not necessarily follow that the redupli-
cation of the columnals was the result of a series of actual morphological fractures
as just described.
This is the most obvious explanation, and the one which may be most readily
grasped; at the same time, through explaining the development of the alternating
fuleral ridges, it indicates with a reasonable degree of accuracy the method by which
the rapidly deveioping columns of the later fossil and of the recent types, as opposed
to the slowly developing columns of the paleozoic forms, have come into existence.
The primitive type of column, occurring in the paleozoic species almost
exclusively, but persisting in the recent Plicatocrinide, is characterized by short
cylindrical columnals which have the articular faces marked with radiating
ridges. The explanation of the origin of this type of column is somewhat
Fis. 130-134.—130, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CALYX
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 203
Fie. 131.
Fic, 134.
Fia. 133.
AND PROXIMAL COLUMNALS OF A SPECIMEN OF NAUMACHOCRINUS HAWANENSIS
FROM THE HAWAMAN ISLANDS, SHOWING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE BASALS, RADIALS, AND FIRST PRIMIBRACHS. 131,
LATERAL VIEW OF THE CALYX AND PROXIMAL COLUMNALS OF A SPECIMEN OF BYTHOCRINUS CONIFER FROM BRAZIL, SHOWING
THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE BASALS, RADIALS, AND FIRST PRIMIBRACHS (CAMERA LUCIDA DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR).
132, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CROWN AND PROXIMAL COLUMNALS OF 4 SPECIMEN OF MONACHOCRINUS PARADOXUS FROM THE
Bay OF BENGAL, SHOWING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE BASALS, RADIALS, AND ARMS (DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR).
133, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CALYX AND PROXIMAL COLUMNALS OF ONE OF POURTALES’ ORIGINAL SPECIMENS OF DEMOCRINUS
RAWSONI FROM BARBADOS, SHOWING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE BASALS, RADIALS, AND FIRST PRIMIBRACHS (CAMERA
LUCIDA DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR). 134, THE BASAL CIRCLET AND PROXIMAL COLUMNALS OF A SPECIMEN OF MONACHOCRINUS
CARIBBEUS FROM THE West INDIES (CAMERA LUCIDA DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR).
204 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
more complicated than the rough and general sketch just presented might lead
one to suppose; but it has certain ontogenetical and phylogenetical facts in its favor,
and does not involve the formation of two separate plates by simple post-larval
division of a primitive single plate—a process the existence of which is as yet un-
proven among the echinoderms.
A erinoid attached by the adherence of the central plate to some solid object
upon the sea floor would be subjected to a certain amount of strain from wave
motion, or from the unequal movements of its own arms, as well as from the pas-
sage of other organisms. This strain would be felt along the suture connecting
this central plate with the basals (or the infrabasals), and along the interbasal
sutures. There are two ways of meeting this condition: (1) the basals (or the in-
frabasals or both) may become more upright and more nearly parallel with each
other and fuse solidly with the central plate (mow become a thick stalk); this has
occurred in Holopus; (2) a second central plate, exactly similar to the original
one, may be formed within—that is, ventral to—it, leaving a ligamentous articula-
tion between them by which the strain is taken up, and this process may be con-
tinued indefinitely until a long articulated stalk is formed.
A column formed by this process would of necessity be composed of very
numerous and very short columnals, for the columnals would be attached to each
other not by true articulations but by loose sutures; the amount of possible accom-
modation at a loose suture is far less than that at a true articulation, in which an
articular fuleral ridge is developed and the ligament fibers have become segre-
gated into two bundles one on either side of it, and therefore many such loose su-
tures must be developed in a given length of column to do the work of a single
articulation.
This explanation derives the crinoid stem from the original central plate equally
well with the first, while at the same time it indicates the formation of the col-
umnals from their first inception by a continuous twinning or reduplicative process,
each columnal being formed by an original ossification of the same type and in the
same place, thus making each individual columnal, as well as the entire column,
the equivalent of a single calyx plate—a state of affairs which, so far as we can
see, is probably very near the truth.
From what we know of the formation and development of the columnals in
the recent crinoids it would appear that they are derived from an apical calyx plate
after the phylogenetical formation and fixation of that plate, in other words,
after the perfection of the skeletal investment of the calyx. Moreover it is only
by such a supposition that we are able to bring into phylogenetical agreement and
to reduce to a common 4nd logical starting point such diverse apical conditions
as are found in Marsupites and Uintacrinus, Holopus, the pentacrinites and the
comatulids.
But there is another possibility which, however remote, should not be over-
looked. The apical area of the crinoidal ancestor may have been merely a pliable
integument filled with primitive spicules and dissociated plates, as we see it in
the earlier and many of the later echinoids, the sum total of which is the equiva-
lent of the apical plate, later formed or assembled. The animal may have become
Figs. 135-143.—135, COLUMNALS FROM THE CENTER OF THE COLUMN OF RHIZOCR'
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 205
Fic. 135. Fic. 136. Fie. 137. Fia. 138.
a
é
Fig. 139.
.
Fia. 140. Fie. 141. Fia. 142. Fie, 143.
INUS LOFOTENSIS FROM NORWAY, SHOWING A
PRIMITIVE LONG BOURGUETICRINOID TYPE WITH A CENTRAL RAISED ANNULUS. 136, COLUMNALS FROM THE CENTER OF THE
COLUMN OF BYTHOCRINUS INTERMEDIUS 165 MM. IN TOTAL LENGTH FROM THE GULF OF MEXICO, SHOWING LONG BOURGUE-
TICRINOID COLUMNALS WITHOUT A CENTRAL ANNULUS. 137, COLUMNALS FROM THE CENTER OF THE COLUMN OF RHIZOCRINUS
ETICRINOID COLUMNALS OF MEDIUM LENGTH. 138, COLUMNALS FROM THE LOWER
VERRILLI FROM FLORIDA, SHOWING BOURGU
(DISTAL) PORTION OF THE COLUMN OF THE TYPE OF DEMOCRINUS RAWSONT FROM BARBADOS, SHOWING VERY SHORT BOUR-
GUETICRINOID COLUMNALS. 139, DIAGRAM ILLUSTRATING TYPICAL BOURGUETICRINOID COLUMNALS; (a) LATERAL VIEW, AND
(b) THE DISTAL END, SHOWING THE TYPE OF INTERCOLUMNAR ARTICULATION. 140, COLUMNALS FROM THE LOWER PART OF
THE COLUMN OF A SPECIES OF DEMOCRINUS FROM MONTSERRAT, SHOWING SWOLLEN AND BEAD-LIKE BOURGUETICRINOID
COLUMNALS. 141, COLUMNALS FROM THE LOWER PART OF THE COLUMN OF RHIZOCRINUS VERRILLI FROM FLORIDA, SHOW-
ING BOURGUETICRINOID COLUMNALS WITH SWOLLEN ENDS, APPROACHING THE PHRYNOCRINOID TYPE, 142, COLUMNALS FROM
THE LOWER PART OF THE COLUMN OF MONACHOCRINUS ‘CARIBBEUS FROM THE WEST INDIES, SHOWING LONG BOURGUETI-
CRINOID COLUMNALS WITH GREATLY SWOLLEN ENDS, ‘APPROACHING THE PHRYNOCRINOID TYPE. 143, PART OF THE COLUMN
OF A VERY YOUNG ISOCRINUS DECORUS FROM CUBA, SHOWING THE BOURGUETICRINOID COLUMNALS INTERSPERSED WITH
NODALS WHICH ARE JOINED TO THE INFRANODALS (JUST BENEATH THEM) BY SYZYGY.
206 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
attached by this soft integument which then lengthened out into a slender stalk,
resembling the stalk of such forms as Boltenia, carrying with it, of course, the spi-
cular investment, the included calcareous deposits of which increased in number
and became segregated into definite ossicles. Such an origin for the column would
accord with what we know of the origin of the cirri and of the distal portion of
the pinnules.
This would make it clear at once how it is that the prolongations from the
chambered organ and the associated structures became continued into the column;
but while there is evidence that something of the kind may have occurred in certain
of the older fossils, it does not seem to have occurred in any of the recent types
nor in any of their immediate fossil representatives. ,
The elongation of the apical plate as presupposed in the two first alternatives
does not necessarily call for a uniform deposit of stereom all over its internal surface.
The chambered organ and the accessory structures probably retained their original
relationship with its center and became drawn out into a complex axial cord as a
result of the deposit of stereom about the periphery; or the new columnals, formed
just within the apical plate, arose as rings (as the topmost columnals do in all of
the recent forms) which grew inward until the distal portion of the elongated
chambered organ was reduced to a very small diameter.
As described above, these three possible origins of the column and of the indi-
vidual columnals would appear to be very different, but upon consideration it be-
comes evident that the difference is more in words than in fact. We are probably
nearest the truth if we consider that all three alternatives play a part in the for-
mation of the crinoid column, but place the greatest emphasis upon the second.
The columns of the later and recent crinoids in general differ from those of the
earlier forms in developing with much greater rapidity, though this is masked by
the fact that they possess also a definite growth limit at the attainment of which
further development ceases, such a growth, limit being unknown in the paleozoic
types.
A series of loose sutures is mechanically available only for slowly growing
columns, in which the individual columnals are very short. With increasing pro-
portionate length the loose sutures between the columnals gradually undergo a
differentiation; a fuleral ridge develops, and the ligament fibers become segregated
into two large bundles, one on either side of it.
It is by this process that a column formed according to the second hypothesis
becomes transformed into the type characteristic of the later fossil and the recent
crinoids.
There is a definite limit to the possibilities of further growth in a column com-
posed of long ossicles fastened end to end by alternating articulations consisting
of two ligament masses separated by a fuleral ridge. If the animal remains small
with a small light crown, such a column may safely attain a length of 100 or more
columnals, but if the crown should become of large size and heavy, a stem of this
type would not be able to support it; the rapidly increasing tendency to “buckle’”’
would limit the available length of a stem of this nature.
207
CRIN OIDS.
EXISTING
THE
MONOGRAPH OF
PIMITTITITIIT TT TITTTTITITIM TTT
CHARLOTTE ISLANDS, SHOWING THE
THE CENTRAL PORTION OF THE COLUMN (b), AND
UEEN
THE LAST ILLUSTRATLN'
JS FROM THE Q
PINNATU
NUS
N OF PTILOCE
SPECIME.
Fia. 144.—LATERAL VIEW OF A
T THE TERMINAL STEM PLATE (a)
DISTAL PORTION OF THE COLUMN, WITHOU
G THE RELATIONSHIPS OF THE BAS!
YN (c),
THE PROXIMAL PORTION OF THE COLUMN AND THE CROW
AUTHOR).
RADIALS, AND ARMS (DRAWING BY THE
208 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
There are four possible ways of escape from such a calamity: (1) The column
may be discarded; (2) the individual columnals may become greatly shortened,
the motion lost through the great diminution in the original beveling at the articu-
lations being compensated by the greatly increased number of articulations in a
given section of stem; (3) the articulations may alter the direction of their fuleral
ridges so that, instead of each being at right angles to the preceding and succeeding,
they may each lie at only a slight angle to the preceding (all diverging toward the
same side), thus mutually bracing each other and attaining a collective rigidity,
like a pile of narrow boards built up spirally; or (4) the original fulcral ridge may
disintegrate, each half breaking up longitudinally and spreading out fan like, the
two fan-like figures eventually uniting to form an articular surface composed of
numerous uniform radiating lines, each line representing a narrow ridge, and the
joint face becoming circular in outline instead of narrowly elliptical.
The comatulids fulfill the conditions of the first possibility; before the animal
is large enough to cause any danger of “buckling” the column is discarded at the
articulation between the topmost columnal which remains unmodified, and the
centrodorsal. Phrynocrinus (fig. 2, p. 61) is the best recent example of the second
case, though all the larger species of the various genera of the Bourgueticrinide,
as for instance of Democrinus (fig. 138, p. 205) exhibit the same feature in varying
degrees of perfection. The curious fossil Platycrinus (fig. 516, pl. 1) typifies the
third. Among the recent forms Proisocrinus (fig. 128, p. 199) (probably also Car-
penterocrinus), and possibly Hyocrinus, Thalassocrinus (fig. 145, p. 209), Gephyro-
crinus, Ptilocrinus (fig. 144, p. 207), Calamocrinus, and the pentacrinites (see beyond),
(figs. 126, p. 195, and 127, p. 197) are instances of the fourth.
In the genera Hyocrinus, Ptilocrinus, Calamocrinus, Gephyrocrinus and Thalas-
socrinus the column is attached by a solid terminal stem plate, and the individual
columnals are cylindrical with their circular articular faces marked with radiating
lines; the proportionate length of the columnals varies with the size of the animal,
the columnals being longest in the smallest species.
There is no evidence whatever that these columnals were derived through
columnals of the bourgueticrinoid type, or that young individuals possess co-
lumnals in any way different from those of the adults.
There is no trace whatever of a proximale; in Calamocrinus, where the topmost
columnal has been investigated with great care, it has been found to be a very thin
quinquelobate structure, the quinquelobate form undoubtedly resulting from the
mechanical limitations imposed upon it by its place of origin, just below the five
basals.
While we know that this type of column may be derived through the bour-
gueticrinoid type, as it is in the pentacrinites for instance, we are not justified in
assuming that in these genera it has undergone any such development. It is quite
possible, even almost probable, that we have here a case of the survival of the
typical paleozoic column in a recent group.
The change from the type of column characteristic of the young of Antedon
to that characteristic of Phrynocrinus may be traced step by step in the family
Bourgueticrinide, beginning with the little R. lofotensis and ending with the
209
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS,
CTO
Fig. 145.—LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF THALASSOCRINUS PONTIFER FROM THE MOLUCCAS, SHOWING THE DISTAL PORTION
OF THE COLUMN, WITHOUT THE TERMINAL STEM PLATE (@), THE CENTRAL PORTION OF THE COLUMN (b), AND THE PROXIMAL
PORTION OF THE COLUMN AND THE CROWN (c), THE LAST ILLUSTRATING THE RELATIONSHIPS OF THE BASALS, RADIALS,
AND ARMS,
210 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
gigantic Democrinus weberi, very near in stem structure, though vastly inferior in
size of crown, to Phrynocrinus nudus, as well as in individual columns in the
species of Nawmachocrinus (fig. 129, p. 201).
The transition from the primitive antedonid or bourgueticrinoid type of stem
to the curiously twisted column of Platycrinus may be easily followed in a good
series of the young of certain of the species of that genus, or even in single speci-
mens in which the young stem is preserved. Certain species of Platycrinus when
fully grown appear to lose the distal portion of the column in just the same way as
the same thing occurs in the pentacrinites, though in Platycrinus the free existence
seems to be assumed somewhat later in life, and in many species is never assumed
at all.
I have observed the change from the Antedon-like young stem to the radially
arranged adult stem in Jsocrinus and in related genera (fig. 143, p. 205), and have
noticed that in the largest species of Bathycrinus the fulcral ridges of the articula-
tions broaden out on each side of the central canal, becoming more or less wedge-
shaped or triangular, and exhibiting a strong tendency to break up into radiating
ridges, the articulations thus approaching the uniformly radiated type found in
such genera as Calamocrinus, Proisocrinus (fig. 525, pl. 1), Ptilocrinus, Hyocrinus,
Gephyrocrinus, and Thalassocrinus so closely as to leave no doubt as to the
possibility of their origin in this way.
It might be urged that the articular faces of the columnals of the pentacrinites
and of the upper part of the stem in Proisocrinus and Carpenterocrinus, with their
petaloid markings, could not be placed in the same class with articulations like those
of Calamocrinus, where the joint faces are uniformly marked with radiating lines;
but in these genera it is merely a case of the columnals, primarily with articular
faces bearing regular radiating lines, being molded or cast into petaloid sectors
by the under surface of the basals against which they lie and against which they
are formed, these basals being in a curiously reduced condition, between the normal
type of basal as seen in Calamocrinus or in Ptilocrinus, and the atrophied and
metamorphosed condition seen in Antedon, though more closely approaching the
latter. In Proisocrinus, indeed, all types of columnals occur from those with
radiating ridges upon the joint faces, at the base of the stem, to those with petaloid
sectors, just under the calyx (fig. 128, p. 199).
In the pentacrinites and in certain species of Platycrinus the earliest part of
the column, as already explained, is just like the stem of the young comatulid; this
never develops further, but is eventually discarded, much as the stem is discarded
in the comatulids. In Proisocrinus, however, the young stem is not discarded, but
develops along the lines indicated in the large species of Bathycrinus and Rhizocrinus
until the Calamocrinus type is reached. Probably when young Proisocrinus pos-
sesses basals like those of Ptilocrinus or of Calamocrinus; in later life, however, the
basals gradually become dwarfed, or at least do not develop in proportion to the
other calyx elements, so that they approach in character those of the pentacrinites,
and with this change in the basals the columnals also begin to assume the pen-
tacrinite form.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 211
The most primitive type of columnal has about its center a raised band mark-
ing the position of the original annulus from which the rest of the columnal has
been built up. This band, however, is only preserved in comparatively rare
instances, and usually only in the columns of small and delicate forms, such as
Rhizocrinus lofotensis (fig. 135, p. 205).
The primitive form of the terminal stem plate is a circular disk (fig. 532, pl. 3),
and this is the form first taken in all young pentacrinoids. In some pentacrinoids,
and in a few of the stalked species, this form is maintained with little or no varia-
tion, but in many pentacrinoids the originally circular disk grows not by a uniform
extension of its entire border, but by more or less definitely localized additions of
calcareous matter, so that it becomes lobate or, in extreme cases, sharply digiti-
form (figs. 533-540, pl. 3).
The terminal stem plate in Promachocrinus is strongly lobate or more or less
digitiform, suggesting that of the species of Hathrometra. This type of stem plate
always accompanies greatly elongated columnals in pentacrinoid larve. If the
columnals are very short the terminal stem plate approaches a circular form, length-
ening columnals being correlated with an increasingly lobate outline, which finally
becomes digitiform.
Pentacrinoid larvee with short columnals and a more or less circular terminal
stem plate, in other words, with a column of comparatively slow growth, never
show any trace of radicular cirri; but pentacrinoid larvee with very long columnals
and a strongly digitiform terminal stem plate, that is, with a very rapid stem
growth, often form additional attachments further up the column (figs. 540,
541, pl. 3).
Radicular cirri are entirely distinct from the other type of cirri (fig. 127,
p. 197); they are most perfect at the base of the column and rapidly become
smaller and less perfect toward the crown. The true cirri are always absent
from the base of the: column, first appearing, usually in a deficient series of
more or less imperfect individuals, just beyond (reckoning from the terminal
stem plate) the first stem syzygy, the most perfect and the best developed being
just under the crown.
The radicular cirri are merely special processes developed from the overgrowth
and expansion of the terminal stem plate, and are always confined to the region
below the first stem syzygy; the true cirri represent five dorsal processes, or groups
of processes, one from each of the five metameric divisions of the body.
Radicular cirri are probably to be interpreted as originally a terminal stem
plate which is reduplicated through a number of columnals on account of the very
rapid growth of the latter; that is, a number of the earliest columnals possess a
tendency, progressively decreasing, to expand laterally at the ends; but on account
of the fuleral ridge such expansion can only take place at two points, so that it
forms two long processes, one on either side.
The radicular cirri themselves are best considered as representing a step in
development beyond the digitiform type of terminal stem plate; this form of stem
plate is developed from the circular through the lobate as a result of a great increase
in the rate of growth; further increase in the rate of growth results in immensely
increasing the length of the digitiform processes, which become jointed and branched.
212 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Thus the radicular cirri represent a structure peculiar to the distal end of the
column, and have nothing whatever to do with the other cirri, which, in the recent
forms, are never known to occur beyond the first stem syzygy.
In the comatulids the single syzygy in the stem occurs between the centrodorsal
and the columnal next beneath it (fig. 553, pl. 5); in the pentacrinites each nodal
is united to the columnal just beneath it by a syzygy, which in structure and in
location’ is the exact counterpart of the single comatulid stem syzygy (figs. 127,
p- 197, and 143, p. 205). In the bourgueticrinoid type of column any two of
the columnals may be united by syzygy, these double columnals usually being rare
in the distal portion of the stem and increasing in frequency near the crown (fig. 129,
p. 201; a stem syzygy is seen at the letter 6). While in the comatulids and in the
pentacrinites the columnal just above a syzygy always gives rise to cirri, which,
though usually five in number (fig. 127, p. 197), may be as few as two or even
one, or may go to the other extreme and be as many as 80 or more, in the bourgueti-
crinoid type of column this does not occur, the epizygal (if this term may be used in
this connection) being in no way different from the hypozygal, the two being closely
united, with the line of union slightly everted.
The syzygies in the stems of the stalked crinoids are not in any way homologous
with those in the arms; though they are structurally and mechanically identical, this
identity means nothing more than formation under ontogenetically similar con-
ditions of structures with radically different phylogenetic antecedents.
The syzygies in the arms occur between two ossicles which, in the transformation
from a biserial to a uniserial condition, have not quite succeeded in fusing into a
single ossicle, and, on the other hand, have not retained their individuality. The
syzygial pairs of the arms are intermediate in character between the ossicles of the
division series and first two brachials of the free undivided arm, each of which is
primarily a double structure, and the outer brachials, all primarily single structures.
All recent and mesozoic crinoids possess a proximale or a strictly homologous
structure, typically single and attached permanently to the calyx, as in Millericrinus,
Bourgueticrinus, Phrynocrinus (fig. 2, p. 61), Thiollericrinus and the comatulids,
but sometimes multiple, occurring all together just under the calyx, asin Apiocrinus,
or at regular intervals throughout the column, as in the pentacrinites (fig. 127, p. 197),
or at frequent intervals in the proximal portion of the column and becoming less
common distally, as in Proisocrinus (fig. 128, p. 199), Rhizocrinus, Bathycrinus,
Monachocrinus, and Democrinus.
The proximale primarily denotes the maturity of the column and the comple-
tion of stem growth, and is therefore quite analogous to the large lip developed in
the Helicide and in other gastropods. It is normally the last columnal to be
formed and, as no further columnal formation occurs, it becomes intimately attached
to the calyx, fusing with the infrabasals and forming to all intents and purposes a
dorsal calyx plate. The proximale probably secondarily represents the original
central calyx plate from which the stem was developed by a more or less complex
process of reduplication.
Welded to the dorsal surface of the calyx by a union exactly similar to that
between the basals and the radials, by a close suture which to all intents and purposes
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 213
is a syzygy, the proximale, naturally taking the shape of the dorsal part of the
calyx, becomes pentagonal or circular and assumes the function of a central dorsal
plate.
Now the enlargement of the proximale affects also the columnal just beneath it,
the proximal (upper) face of which increases to a size equal to that of the distal
(lower) face of the proximale and, entirely losing the characteristic joint face
sculpture, becomes closely approximated to the distal face of the proximale, uniting
with it in exactly the same way as the proximale unites with the calyx plates. This
union between the proximale and the columnal just below it is the so-called stem
syzygy; but it is in reality merely a close suture, strictly homologous with the close
suture between the proximale and the basals and between the basals and the radials.
Proximales, or columnals homologous to proximales, are always attached to the
columnals just below them by these so-called syzygies, which differ from the other
articulations of the stem in having a plane, or nearly plane, surface without radial
crenelle, petaloid sectors, or transverse ridges; in other words, resembling the
surface of the radials to which the centrodorsal is attached, or by which the radials
are attached to each other.
Primarily there was but one syzygy in the column, that between the proximale
and the columnal just below it. Such an arrangement is seen in the pentacrinites,
in which the proximale is reduplicated at regular intervals along the stem in the
shape of so-called nodals, all of which are united to the infranodals by syzygy, and ~
in the comatulids, in which the single stem syzygy is the seat of the fracture by
which the animal becomes free.
The formation ofthe proximale, closely attached to the dorsal surface of the
calyx and fused with the infrabasals, prevents the formation of new columnals above
it and marks the maturity or end of growth of the stem. But columnal formation
may continue by intercalation between the columnals immediately below the stem
syzygy, or excessive vegetative power may shove the proximale outward before it
fuses with the calyx. In the adult pentacrinites new proximales are continu-
ally forming beneath the calyx, where every new columnal formed is a proximale,
only to be pushed outward by younger ones. Later these become separated by
intercalated segments, each of them becoming united by syzygy to the intercalated
segment immediately below it.
In Rhizocrinus, Bathycrinus and allied genera syzygies arefound throughout the
column, with increasing frequency toward the crown. Each of the syzygial pairs
_ represents an effort to form a proximale, and each is the exact equivalent of the
nodal of the pentacrinite plus the infranodal (just beneath it); the enormous vege-
tative power of the column, though much less than in the pentacrinites, has pre-
vented the fixation of the proximale by the formation of added columnals above it,
while the more uniform growth has prevented its specialization, and the incipient
proximale, united to the columnal just below it, has passed outward in the shape of a
syzygial pair.
The series of short discoidal columnals at the summit of the stem of Monachocri-
nus (figs. 132, 134, p. 203) and allied genera corresponds exactly to the cone-like struc-
ture at the summit of the stem in Apiocrinus. This latter has resulted through the
214 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
enormous swelling by external accretion of the calyx plates, which has also affected
the lower brachials and, together with the proximale, the columnals immediately
below it in rapidly decreasing degree. As enlargement is the chief factor involved in
the differentiation of the proximale from the other columnals, it naturally follows that
all columnals enlarged will take on the characteristics of proximales in proportion
to the amount of their enlargement. Thus in Apiocrinus we find not a single
proximale at the summit of the column, but a series of them of diminishing size,
distally grading more or less gradually into columnals of the usual type.
The series of short discoidal columnals at the summit of the stem in Monachocri-
nus is the cone-shaped structure seen in Apiocrinus in an atrophied and obsolete con-
dition; it represents a group of imperfect proximales which occurs in these genera in
addition to the imperfect proximales found at rapidly increasing intervals toward the
distal end of the column.
The pentacrinites also form a continuous series of proximales (called in this case
nodals) immediately beneath the calyx in exactly the same way; but in this group
stem growth is so exaggerated that intercalation of columnals at once begins and
progresses so rapidly that by the time the proximales (nodals) are fully developed
they are separated from each other by from one or two to as many as 40 or more
columnals of the ordinary type in the group.
Intercalation of columnals also occurs in Apiocrinus, but in this genus it is so
‘ feebly evident as to be quite negligible as a factor in column building. In Proiso-
crinus (fig. 128, p. 199), while the lower part of the column resembles that of Apio-
crinus, the proximal half has taken on the characteristics of the column found in the
pentacrinites.
The repetition of the proximale throughout the length of the column in Monacho-
crinus and allied genera with decreasing frequency toward the distal end, and its
repetition in the pentacrinites at perfectly regular intervals, is singularly similar
to the conditions which we find in the arms.
In the arms the axillaries (figs. 81, p. 134, and 164, p. 227) are all primarily redupli-
cated radials, and the radials themselves, like the proximales, are secondarily, not pri-
marily, calyx plates; each one of the axillaries forms the base of what is essentially
an entirely new series of brachials, in exactly the same manner that the radial forms
the base of the post-radial series as a whole, and the proximales form the end of a
completed column.
In extraneous division of the type occurring in Metacrinus the axillaries occur
with decreasing frequency toward the tips of the arms, just as the reduplications of
the proximale occur with decreasing frequency toward the distal end of the column in
Monachocrinus and its allies; furthermore, with increasing distance from the calyx the
less perfect do the reduplications, both of the radial and of the proximale, become.
In interpolated division as we see it in the comatulids and in all the pentacrinites
excepting Metacrinus (as well as in many other diverse types) the repetition of the
radial (forming the axillaries) occurs at regular intervals, just as the repetition of
the proximale occurs at perfectly regular intervals in the column of the pentacrinites ;
moreover, the reduplications both of the radial and of the proximale are all exactly,
or very nearly exactly, alike, all being singularly perfect.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 215
. As aresult of the invariable occurrence of a proximale, or one or more equivalent
structures, in the columns of the mesozoic and later crinoids (excepting in the
Encrinide, which in this as in other respects agree with paleozoic forms, and in the
Plicatocrinidx), the varied shape of the column, which may be circular, elliptical, pen-
tagonal or stellate in section, the variation in the attachment, which may be by radicu-
lar cirri, by a terminal stem plate, by a solid welding, or absent altogether, and the
enormous variability in the columnar growth, this being in some types, as in the pen-
tacrinites, excessive, and in others, as in Thiolliericrinus, abruptly reduced, while occa-
sionally, asin Marsupites and Uintacrinus, it is absent altogether, or, as in the other
comatulids, ceases abruptly before maturity is reached, the column in these types
comes to present the most reliable characters for broad systematic differentiation.
In the palzeozoic forms, where the columns are, with rare exceptions, of a uniform type
and composed of a series of similar columnals, the variations in calyx structure are
of deep significance, far outweighing the characters offered by the column in system-
atic value; but in the later forms we see at once that in general the variations in
calyx structure are the direct result of the mechanical factors called into play by the
variations in the column. Thus as in the mesozoic and later types the calyx struc-
ture is entirely dependent upon the structure of the column and has no special sig-
nificance other than illustrating methods of meeting various types of stresses in-
duced by the several types of stems, we are led to delimit our higher. groups in terms
of column structure, passing over the vagaries of the calices, which are quite depend-
ent upon it.
In the typical crinoid column there may be recognized three distinct regions
each of which includes a different type of columnal from the other two; these
three regions are (1) the distal, (2) the middle, and (3) the proximal. The distal
region includes the terminal stem plate or root, together with a varying number
of columnals above it; these columnals are short, but very broad, and in the
bourgueticrinoid type of column their articular surfaces are usually more nearly
circular in outline than are those of any of the other columnals except the redupli-
cated proximales; they attained a fixed length when the animal was very small,
and further increase has been entirely in the direction of additional breadth
through the process of peripheral accretion so that, with increasing age, they
become continually broader and proportionately shorter. Almost imperceptibly
these columnals characteristic of the distal region transform into the columnals
of the middle region; these latter are more slender, but actually and proportionately
markedly longer; they are formed at the period of adolescence, which is the period
of maximum growth power. Very gradually these columnals change into the type
characteristic of the proximal region; the columnals .of the proximal region are
shorter than those of the middle region, and any ornamentation or other distinctive
feature which the column may possess is upon them greatly accentuated; they
mark the passing of the adolescent period of maximum growth power and the
assumption of the perfective (as opposed to the purely vegetative) vigor of maturity.
In order properly to appreciate the column in its relation to the other units of
the comatulid whole, and especially in its relations to the centrodorsal, and to appre-
ciate the essential similarity between the columnals, individually and collectively,
216 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
and the calyx plates, it is necessary here to include an account of the later develop-
ment of this organ. This has been carefully worked out by W. B. Carpenter; he
writes: ‘‘Concurrently with the advance in the development of the calyx (see
beyond under Development), the column undergoes an increase both in the number
and in the length of its component segments, and while it also increases to some
extent in diameter, its solidity is still more augmented by the endogenous growth
of its caleareous skeleton. The terminal stem plate augments both in diameter and
in thickness, absorbing into itself, as it were, nearly the whole of the organic sub-
stance of the basal disk. Its typical form may be considered as circular, but its
margin is usually more or less deeply divided into lobes. Its diameter is usually
about 0.015 inch. In its center is a deep depression that lodges the end of the
lowest columnal. The length of each of the original columnals is augmented by new
calcareous deposits at the extremities which finally become compactly rounded off
and well defined, so that the apposed surfaces of two segments are clearly marked
off from each other instead of having their irregularities commingled as in the
earlier period of their formation. The diameter of each segment increases by new
calcareous deposit on its cylindrical surface, bringing up its whole length to the
size of the first formed median ring and finally giving to its extremities a slight
excess beyond this. At the same time the solidity of each segment is increased by
an inward extension of the calcareous trellis-work which progressively fills up what
was at first a hollow cylinder. This internal solidification, however, goes on more
slowly than the completion of the external form and dimensions of the segments,
for these may present their mature aspect, or nearly so, while possessing so little
substance that their shape is materially altered by the drying up of the soft sarcodic
axis of their interior. While the original segments are thus advancing toward
completion, new segments are being developed in the interval between the highest
of these and the base of the calyx. By the time that the opening out of the calyx
commences the number of columnals has usually risen to 15 or 16, those of the
inferior third of the column are pretty nearly solidified throughout, but those of the
middle and upper thirds are still so far from having attained their completion that
their caleareous cylinders when broken across are found to be mere shells. The
highest plate, upon which the base of the calyx rests, is now distinguished from those
below it by its somewhat larger diameter, but it does not as yet present any approach
to the peculiar shape which it afterwards comes to possess. The entire column
remains clothed with a thin layer of sarcodic substance and its cavity is occupied
by a cylinder of the same which forms a continuous axis throughout its entire
length and passes up at its summit into the calyx.”
Carpenter was unable to find at this stage any traces of that fibrous structure
which may be distinguished about the ends of the segments at a subsequent time.
He continues: “During the earlier part of the spreading out of the calyx, a
continued increase takes place in the number of columnals by the development of
new rings at its summit, while the previously formed columnals of its middle and
upper portions become progressively elongated and solidified as those of the lower
portion have previously been, At or about the period at which the change takes
place in the relative positions of the oral and anal plates, the production of new
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 217
calcareous segments in the column appears to cease, and a remarkable change
begins to show itself in the one on which the calyx rests. Instead of increasing in
length, its original annular disk augments in diameter, becoming convex on its
lower surface and concave on its upper, and it extends itself over the bottom of
the calyx in such a manner as to receive into its concavity the apices of the basals.
This change commences while the calcareous segments next below are still rudi-
mentary, so that although no further increase in the number of segments takes
place subsequently, yet some increase in its length will still be effected by the com-
pletion of the last formed columnals, previously immature. The total number
of columnals in a pentacrinoid column is subject to considerable variation, ranging
(in Antedon bifida) from 16 to 24, the average being about 20.”
“Soon after the highest segment of the column begins to enlarge we notice
on that portion ‘of its under surface that extends beyond the columnal upon which
it rests one or more minute tubercles which are the origins of the dorsal cirri.
Each of these tubercles is formed by a projection of the sareodie substance of the
perisome, within which are observable one or more minute annular disks of calca-
reous reticulation. The projection of the tubercle gradually increases, and the
number of disks (which are the rudimentary cirrals) is multiplied, so that each
incipient cirrus presents the form of a short cylinder, marked by transverse annu-
lations. The length of this cylinder is progressively augmented by the formation
of new disks and by an increase in the thickness of the earlier ones, and the ter-
minal segment soon presents an indication of the peculiar character it is ultimately
to assume. As each cirrus elongates, its extremity, at first bluntly rounded,
becomes pointed, the terminal segment developing itself into a conical form, though
still covered with the same investment of condensed sarcode as extends over the
entire length of the rudimentary cirrus. The cirri of the first whorl alternate in
position with the radials; they are not developed at the same time, but progres-
sively about the periphery of the centrodorsal, the first one, corresponding in posi-
tion to the commencement of the intestine, usually exhibiting numerous segments
and a conical termination before the fifth, which is opposite the radianal plate,
appears.
“Tn the later stages of pentacrinoid life the column shows no increase in the
number of its segments, but those last formed are developed to almost the same
length as the rest, and all the columnals are somewhat augmented in diameter
toward their extremities so as to present somewhat of the ‘dice-box’ form. The
original annulus, which is still distinguishable in the middle of their length, so far
from constituting a projection, now lies in a hollow. The axial cavity, if not quite
obliterated by the filling up of the segments, is very much contracted; on this point
it is difficult to arrive at a positive determination. The connection of the columnals
by a distinct fibrous tissue resembling that of the arms, and not merely passing
from one articular extremity to the other, but ‘also embracing the contiguous
extremities which it connects, now becomes obvious.
“The most important change which the column presents at this period con-
sists in the enlargement of its highest basin-shaped segment, from which the dorsal
79146°—Bull. 82—15 15
218 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
cirri are developed, and in the further development and multiplication of the
cirri themselves. This segment, which now presents the aspect in’ miniature of
the centrodorsal of the adult Antedon, augments not only in absolute but in rela-
tive diameter, extending itself over the dorsal or outer surface of the basals, which,
at the time of the detachment of the. body from the column, are almost entirely
concealed by it. The first-formed whorl of cirri now shows itself ready for pre-
hensile action, its terminal claws being hooked, the calcareous segments being bey-
eled off on their dorsal aspect so as to allow of the downward flexure of the cirri,
and a considerable amount of contractile fibrous structure being developed between
and around the extremities of the segments. A second whorl of cirri is now devel-
oped after the same manner as the first between the latter (with which it alternates
in position) and the base of the calyx, and a third whorl generally makes its appear-
ance before the detachment of the pentacrinoid, so that the young Antedon pos-
sesses 10 cirri in different stages of advanced development, and from one to five
still rudimentary.
“The total length of the fully-grown pentacrinoid, from the base of the column
to the extremities of the arms when these are folded together may be about 0.7
inch, that of the column alone being 0.25 inch; the diameter of the circle formed
by the expanded arms may be 0.5 inch. At this period the body and arms usually
possess a decided color, which is sometimes sulphur yellow, sometimes light crimson,
sometimes an intermixture of both hues; this is usually more pronounced in the
arms than in the body, and is entirely due to the development of pigmentary matter
in the minute pyriform vesicles scattered through the sarcodic layer which still
forms, as in the earliest phase of embryonic life, the general envelope of the body
and its appendages.
“The precise stage of development at which the body of the animal becomes
detached from the stem varies, but the detachment does not seem to occur nor-
mally until the dorsal cirri are sufficiently developed to enable them to take the
place of the stem functionally by giving the animal the means of attaching itself
to fixed objects.”
I can see no other way of deriving the columns of all the recent and most fossil
crinoids than by supposing them to be the potential homologue of the central plate
frequently developed in the later echinoids which has gradually become elongated
and resolved, either by non-physical morphological fracture or by simple reduplica-
tion (probably by the latter method), into a series of ossicles. The fact that when
viewed by polarized light the axis of crystallization is seen to follow the axis of the
column, while in the basals it passes at right angles to the plane of their surfaces and
therefore in the same direction toward the center of the calyx, would seem to indicate,
or at least to suggest, that the sum of the columnals was the potential equivalent of
a single calyx plate.
Of course many animals, as, for instance, the stalked ascidians, attach them-
selves by a small portion of their external covering, which becomes pulled out into
a more or less slender stalk, as in Boltenia; this elongation of the external covering
would naturally carry with it any calcareous structures which happened to be
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 219
included in it. Numerous cases of such elongation of a part of the body wall are
found among the echinoderms as well as in many other groups.
It has been suggested that the columns of crinoids originated thus from the
prolongation of the posterior part of the body of a more or less irregularly plated
primitive ancestor, the plates carried out into the primitive column becoming later
regularly arranged. Aside from the objection that I can not imagine the ancestral
crinoid ever to have possessed an irregularly plated apical portion of the body, I can
see no reason for supposing that the columns of the recent crinoids and of their
immediate fossil representatives were derived through any such process. I consider
that the type of column which is composed of so-called pentameres represents a
different sort of structure entirely from that seen in the recent crinoids, a develop-
ment from a spiculated apical area instead of from a definite central plate, though
the perfected form of both is identical.
Centrodorsal.
The centrodorsal, from which the cirri arise, is the modified topmost columnal
of the pentacrinoid larva, and as such is homologous with the so-called proximale,
and with the nodals of the pentacrinites.
Being the exact equivalent of the proximale, it represents each nodal of the
pentacrinite individually, and, as each nodal is merely a twinned reduplication of a
primarily single proximale, it also represents all the pentacrinite nodals collectively.
Sir Wyville Thomson and W. B. Carpenter stated the exact truth when they
wrote that the centrodorsal represents a coalesced series of pentacrinite nodals; but
unfortunately they failed to appreciate the true homologies and significance of the
nodals, and therefore, while their statement was entirely correct, it has invariably
been misinterpreted by subsequent authors.
In the later fossil and in the recent crmoids, as has been explained in the preced-
ing pages, the column possesses a definite growth limit upon reaching which all
further development ceases, while the topmost columnal enlarges and becomes
permanently attached to the apical portion of the calyx by close suture, and to the
columnal next below by a modified close suture or stem syzygy. Thus these crinoids
typically possess a column always with a definite number of columnals, the topmost
of which has become to all intents and purposes an spical calyx plate attached to
what is now the top of the column by stem syzygy.
The column of the pentacrinoid larve just before the formation of the cirri is
the characteristic column of the later fossil and recent crinoids developed in its most
typical form. But after the growth limit has been reached the proximale continues
to develop, gives rise to radiating cirri, and finally, having become far too large for
the slender column to support, breaks away from the columnal just beneath it by
fracture at the syzygy between them.
The numerous cirri on the periphery of the adult centrodorsal very naturally
gave rise to the idea that possibly this plate was a composite, the resultant of a
process of fusion uniting several individual columnals; but W. B. Carpenter proved
conclusively that in Antedon bifida it is formed by the enlargement of the topmost
columnal alone, no others entering into its construction.
220 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
In certain fossil comatulids, however, the centrodorsal is very long, and the
question arose whether in such cases it might not be composed of several columnals
fused instead of only a single one as it had been proved to be in Antedon. P. H.
Carpenter was at first inclined to believe that this might be true; but when he had
Tia. 150.
Fic. 149.
Figs, 146-150.—146, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATELLA MACULATA FROM TORRES STRAITS
(AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 147, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF NEMASTER LINEATA FROM BRAZIL
(AFTER P.H.CARPENTER). 148, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA SOLARIS FROM AUSTRALIA
(AFTER P, H. CARPENTER). 149, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA SOLARIS FROM AUSTRALIA
(AFTER P, H. CARPENTER). 150, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA PECTINATA (AFTER
P, H. CARPENTER).
occasion to describe the recent Zenometra columnaris (figs. 215, 216, p. 241, and
558, pl. 5), in which the centrodorsal reaches an extreme length, he was unable to
find any evidence whatever which would warrant an opinion that more than one
columnal was involved in its composition.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 221
Fig, 151.
Fia. 153.
Fie. 152.
Fig. 154. eles Fig. 156.
Fig, 158.
Fig. 157. Fig, 159.
Fias. 151-159.—151, THE CIRRIFEROUS CENTRODORSAL, RADIALS, AND IBR) OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA ROTALARIA (AFTER P.H
CARPENTER). 152, THE CENTRODORSAL OF A YOUNG SPECIMEN OF COMATULA ROTALARIA FROM QUEENSLAND, WITH THE
RADIALS AND THE IBR SERIES, SHOWING FUNCTIONAL CIRRI ARRANGED INTERRADIALLY AS IN COMATULA PURPUREA, 153,
THE CENTRODORSAL, RADIALS, AND IBR, OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA ROTALARIA (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 154, THE
CENTRODORSAL, RADIALS, AND IBR, OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA ROTALARIA (APTER P. H, CARPENTER). 155, THE CENTRO-
DORSAL, RADIALS, AND IBR, OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA ROTALARIA (AFTER P. H, CARPENTER). 156, THE CENTRODORSAL,
RADIALS, AND IBR; OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA ROTALARIA (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 157, THE CENTRODORSAL,
RADIALS, AND IBR) OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA ROTALARIA (AFTER P, H. CARPENTER). 158, THE CENTRODORSAL, RADIALS,
AND IBR SERIES OF A FULLY DEVELOPED SPECIMEN OF COMATULA ROTALARIA FROM QUEENSLAND, 159, THE CENTRODORSAL,
RADIALS, AND IBR; OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA ROTALARIA IN WHICH THE FIRST NAMED HAS ATTAINED THE PERFECTED
FORM (AFTER P. H, CARPENTER).
bo
bo
bo
BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Ontogenetically it has been conclusively proved in all the comatulids of which
the young are known that the centrodorsal is a single columnal, and is never formed
through a fusion of two or more, and such evidence as we have points definitely to
the conclusion that it is phylogenetically also a single columnal, homologous with a
single nodal columnal, and at the same time with all the nodal columnals collectively,
of the pentacrinites.
The centrodorsal of the comatulids is the exact equivalent of the so-called
proximale or ‘‘centrodorsal” found in very many of the Flexibilia. In these forms
at some undetermined period in the ontogeny the infrabasals fuse with the topmost
columnal, which enlarges and, together with it, form a structure remaining always
in permanent union with the calyx, the new columnals, if any be subsequently
added, being formed either directly beneath it, or by mtercalation between the
columnals already existing beneath it.
The centrodorsal of the comatulids is formed in exactly the same way, and
maintains exactly the same relationship with the infrabasals and with the other
plates of the calyx.
In such families as the Bourgueticrinide and Apiocrinide (both of which
include recent species) some forms possess a primitive proximale while others do
not, and we find an exactly parallel condition in the pentacrinite-thiollericrinite-
comatulid group, which collectively forms a precise equivalent to either of these
families.
In Thiolliericrinus, which represents in all essentials the basic type from which
both the pentacrinites and the comatulids have been derived, through specialization
in exactly the opposite direction, there is a proximale which is the exact equivalent
of that in such genera as Bourgueticrinus and Millericrinus, the only difference being
that it is cirriferous instead of noncirriferous, a difference of no particular morpho-
logical consequence. In the comatulids this proximale has usurped the functions
of the entire stem which, having become useless, is now discarded before the adult
stage is reached. In the pentacrinites the topmost columnal, though enlarged,
never succeeds in forming an attachment with the infrabasals; this incipient proxi-
male formation, resulting only in the enlargement of the proximal columnal, con-
tinues throughout the life of the individual; each columnal formed just under the
calyx is an incipient proximale, but never becomes fused with the infrabasals; pushed
outward from the calyx by the formation of another nodal columnal between it and
the calyx, it later becomes separated from the columnal which preceded it by a
series of intercalated internodals so that in the stem of the adult pentacrinite we find
a series of incipient proximales or nodals, cirriferous as in the comatulids and in
Thiolliericrinus, separated by a series of unspecialized columnals or internodals.
Phrynocrinus alone of the recent stalked crinoids appears to possess a proximale
of the primitive type, and in this genus the columnals are all uniform in structure,
just as in the larval comatulids. But in all the other genera (or at least in nearly all
of them) incipient proximales occur as modified columnals throughout the stem,
with increasing frequency toward the calyx, each representing an attempt to form
a proximale.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 223
Fig. 162.
Fias. 160-162.—160, THE CENTRAL PORTION OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA, VIEWED DORSALLY, SHOWING THE CIRRI
CONFINED TO THE INTERRADIAL ANGLES OF THE CENTRODORSAL AS IN COMATULA PURPUREA (AFTER P, H. CARPENTER). 161,
THE CENTRAL PORTION OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS WAHLBERG FROM SIMON’S BAY, VIEWED DORSALLY (AFTER P. H.
CARPENTER). 162, THE CENTRAL PORTION OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA ROTALARIA FROM QUEENSLAND, VIEWED DORSALLY
(AFTER P, H. CARPENTER).
224 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
In the very young stems of the pentacrinites the columnals are longer than
broad, as in the stems of the larval comatulids, and they are bound together by
articulations of the bourgueticrinoid type exactly resembling those in the larval
comatulid stem (fig. 143, p. 205); but after each nodal the columnals become shorter
(those of each internode being always alike) and the articular faces become slightly
modified from the original type so that after five or six internodes an approxima-
tion to the true pentacrinite type is reached. The first internode and the terminal
stem plate have never been observed; but from the striking similarity, even in the
number of the component parts, I believe that we are justified in considering the
lowest internode in a pentacrinite stem which has been observed (the first post-
nodal to the second nodal columnals, both inclusive) as strictly homologous with
the entire larval comatulid stem, exclusive of the terminal stem plate, and plus a
very slight modification in the direction of the adult pentacrinite internodal char-
acters. The following internodes progressively become and more differentiated in
the direction of the adult; hence we may confidently assume that the preceding
internodes entirely lacked the very slight specialization which we find in the first
observed; in other words, that they exactly resembled the stems of the larval
comatulids.
Now a young pentacrinite possessing but a single internode, the cirriferous
nodal being the last columnal under the calyx, would be in all its characters prac-
tically identical with a larval comatulid at the time of the development of the first
whorl of cirri, at which time the basals have only just begun to undergo their meta-
morphosis into the rosette.
In the comatulids no further development of the stem as a whole occurs, but
the centrodorsal—the nodal of the pentacrinite—is enormously enlarged and gives
rise to usually one or more additional whorls of cirri, and fracture takes place
between this enlarged topmost columnal and that just beneath, largely as a result
of the great proportionate decrease in the area by which this enlarged topmost
columnal is attached to the following columnal, assisted by a modification from the
primitive bourgueticrinoid type of the articulation uniting the two in the direction
of the so-called stem syzygy (just as the articulation between the nodals and the
infranodals in the pentacrinites is modified) and a consequent weakening of the
union. The metamorphosis of the basals into the rosette, it should be noticed,
does not occur until after the development of the first whorl of cirri; that is, until
after the last possible common stage of development between the comatulid and the
pentacrinite.
In the pentacrinite, on the other hand, the nodal (the centrodorsal of the
comatulids) does not enlarge; a single whorl of cirri is developed, and the union
between the nodal and the infranodal is transformed into a syzygy as in the coma-
tulids although, because of the absence of any enlargement of the nodal or of any
other growth change, this does not weaken it, or at least does not weaken it enough
to induce fracture. The pentacrinite, instead of enlarging the first nodal as do the
comatulids, proceeds to form another stem in which the first nodal occupies a posi-
tion analogous to the terminal stem plate in the original stem of both the pen-
tacrinites and the comatulids, and this stem grows to exactly the morphological
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 225
Fic. 163.—DoRSAL VIEW OF A YOUNG SPECIMEN OF COMANTHINA SCHLEGELIT FROM BANDA, SHOWING THE CIRRI RESTRICTED TO
THE INTERRADIAL ANGLES OF THE CENTRODORSAL AS IN COMATULA PURPUREA (AFTER P. H, CARPENTER).
226 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
length of the first, when it gives rise to a second nodal; but this second stem is
slightly different from the first ; the columnals are slightly shorter, and their articu-
lar faces are very slightly modified. This process is repeated, each subsequent
repetition of the original stem, mainly from mechanical reasons incident to increas-
ing size, taking on more and more of the adult character, until at last the perfect
pentacrinite stem is developed, in which each internode is homologous with the
entire larval column of the comatulid.
The basals of the pentacrinite, though modified by increasing size, remain at
phylogenetically the same stage as the basals of the comatulids at the point where
the comatulids and pentacrinites begin to diverge in their stem characters—the
stage of the development of the first whorl of cirri; otherwise the pentacrinite
crowns and the comatulids develop along exactly parallel lines as evidenced, for one
thing, by their peculiar, but exactly similar, types of arm division and of arm
structure.
It is evident, then, that the centrodorsals of the comatulids both ontogenet-
ically and phylogenetically are the representatives of, and are therefore homologous
with, the nodals of the pentacrinites individually, as well as collectively, as sup-
posed by Thomson; whereas in the comatulids the single nodal is enormously
enlarged and modified in various ways and permanently attached to the crown, in
the pentacrinites each nodal merely marks a stage in the development of a long
and continuously growing stem. Thomson’s conception of the centrodorsal as a
coalesced series of nodals probably was suggested by the very numerous cirri com-
monly present on the centrodorsal of such genera as Antedon, and their arrange-
ment in more or less regular rows, each row being correctly considered as the equiv-
alent of a pentacrinite nodal.
The increase in the number of cirri in the comatulids over the primitive five
may be easily accounted for. Ordinarily the crinoid stem, both in its calcified and
in its uncalcified structures, undergoes continuous growth until the death of the
animal, continually forming new columnals just beneath the calyx. The abrupt
cessation of the development of new columnals in the comatulids has not been cor-
related with a similar cessation in regard to the uncalcified constituents of the stem,
which, unable to develop normally along the usual lines of crinoid growth, have
become repressed within the centrodorsal and have found relief from this repression
in the formation of cirri whenever the ontogenetical development of the repressed
stem constituents calls for the formation of a cirriferous nodal. We thus have a
very curious condition; for, although the centrodorsal itself is strictly homologous
with a single pentacrinite nodal, as well as with all the nodals collectively, the
soft structures within it are not, for they are homologous with the entire penta-
crinite stem, and are, in effect, an entire pentacrinite stem prevented from acquiring
the normal elongate form. The pentacrinite stem in its development continuously
produces nodals at regular intervals; the comatulid centrodorsal continuously pro-
duces new cirri between the most proximal row of cirri and the proximal edge of
the centrodorsal in just the same way, and the progressive development of the
cirri on succeeding nodals in the pentacrinite is exactly duplicated in the comatu-
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. DRT
RE =>
Sox A \ \
>
so
Ry
= oH
a
—a es
SO
> = iy OP P Si) & (s
SSRI ANS
CTs a eek ere
DotA ak OR Be NR ase TTA
rte eat ie ee
>a! % SN r
te .. e Ne SS =
ag: Res iw
-
\ yee S
WL be bat C\ he LT LPT
[ST TTS le, Sa TY
oS a em
ESE LIOR BOs
i
qe 43
Fig. 164.—DoRSAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHINA SCHLEGELI FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, SHOWING THE RELATIVE
PROPORTIONS OF THE VARIOUS PARTS, AND A CENTRODORSAL WITHOUT CIRRI (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
928 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
lids, when we make due allowance for the cramped conditions under which in the
latter cirrus formation occurs.
The alternation and the irregular crowding of the cirrus rows in the comatulids
is the result of mechanical restraint consequent on the comparatively very slow
growth of the centrodorsal. This crowding and accompanying irregularity in
position is most marked in those comatulids in which the centrodorsal is the least
specialized, the species with the more highly specialized and longer types of centro-
dorsal having, as would be expected, more nearly attained a balance between the
calcareous and the uncalcified constituents of the stem.
A few comatulids, belonging to the genus Chlorometra, have the cirri in five
radial columns, exactly as the cirri occur on the pentacrinite stem (fig. 207, p. 239);
many have them confined to the radial portions of the centrodorsal, in which
they may occur in two, three or four columns, or more or less irregularly (figs. 192,
194, 196, 198, p. 237, 200, 203, 204, p. 239, 208-216, p. 241, and 227, 228, p. 245).
All of these species have long and highly specialized centrodorsals. One species
always (Comatula purpurea), and several often, have from 5 to 10 cirri confined
to the interradial angles of the calyx (figs. 79, p. 132, 160, p. 223, 163, p. 225, and
182, p. 233); but in these cases these are always the latest cirri to be formed, and
have persisted after the repression and resorption of all the others, which were
radial in position.
W. B. Carpenter observed that the precise epoch of growth at which the
separation of the comatulids from the larval stem occurs varies greatly; thus, for
example, the young of the species of Hathrometra retain the stem until 20 or 30
cirri have appeared on the centrodorsal, which now conceals the basals, and the
pinnules are developed upon all the lower brachials; whereas in Antedon and in
certain other genera the stem is discarded when there are only 10 well-grown curi
on the centrodorsal, the basals are still visible, and the lowest portions of the arms
are devoid of pinnules. The absolute size which is reached by the mature larve
before dropping off its stem also varies considerably, even within a single species.
At the end of the pentacrinoid stage, when the centrodorsal of Antedonseparates
off from the lower part of the larval stem, ‘‘a minute 5-rayed perforation remains
at its dorsal pole, which corresponds to the central canal in the stem”’ of the stalked
species that gives passage to the neurovascular axis. This is very soon closed up
by calcareous deposit. In a number of fossil forms it has been noticed that this
opening is a characteristic feature, in some species extending ‘‘into a large stellate
impression which occupies a considerable space on tle lower surface of the centro-
dorsal, and in the fossil condition is more or less obliterated.”
P. H. Carpenter believed that in these fossil species this opening in the centro-
dorsal at the dorsal pole is a larval character preserved in adult life; but I am
firmly of the opinion that it is a purely secondary feature, produced after death
by the erosion of the dorsal pole, which in many of the recent species is in life
very thin and composed of a rather loose calcareous deposit. A small amount of
erosion here would suffice to open the central cavity of the centrodorsal to the
exterior, without producing much, if any, change in the remaining more dense
portions of that centrodorsal, or in the radials. The large stellate central opening
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 229
appears to be merely an exaggerated concavity of the dorsal pole, exactly compar-
able to the conditions found in many recent species—for instance, in Comanthus
bennettr and in C. pinguis (figs. 171-174, p. 231). There is no reason whatever for
supposing that the centrodorsal in any fossil species was open at the dorsal pole any
Fia. 167.
Fia. 169.
Fic. 170.
Fics. 165-170.—165, THE CENTRODORSAL AND RADIALS OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHINA SCHLEGELI FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS
(AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 166, THE CENTRODORSAL AND RADIALS OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHINA SCHLEGELI FROM THE
PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 167, THE CENTRODORSAL, RADIALS, AND IBR SERIES OF A SPECIMEN OF
COMANTHERIA ALTERNANS FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS WITH TWO ATROPHIED CIRRI REMAINING. 168, THE CENTRODORSAL
AND RADIALS OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHINA SCHLEGELII FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 169,
THE CENTRODORSAL AND RADIALS OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHINA SCHLEGELII FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P. H.
CARPENTER). 170, THE CENTRODORSAL AND RADIALS OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHINA SCHLEGELI FROM THE PHILIPPINE
ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
more than it is in any recent species, and there is no evidence which undeniably
supports such a view.
The comatulid centrodorsal varies in shape from a small stellate or pentagonal
plate, smooth at the edges and sunk beneath the dorsal surface of the radial penta-
gon (figs. 82, p. 135, 153-159, p. 221, 162, p. 223, 164, p. 227, and 168-170, p. 229),
or a thin disk more or less concave dorsally with a single, often partially deficient,
230 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
row of marginal cirri (figs. 152, p. 221, 165, p. 229, and 175-180, p. 231), to a large
conical or columnar plate twice as long as broad at the base, with nearly or quite
a dozen rows of cirri, which may be irregularly placed, arranged in crowded alter-
nating rows, or situated in definite columns (figs. 192, p. 237, 203, p. 239, and 208—
216, p. 241). :
Almost always the sockets on the centrodorsal to which the cirri are articu-
lated are confined to that organ; but in the calometrid genus Oreometra, and in
certain of the species of the related genus Neometra, the proximal portion of the
sockets of the peripheral cirri commonly is shoved forward onto the radials for a
considerable distance so that the cirri are borne partly on the centrodorsal and
partly on the radials. The axial canals, however, through which the axial cords
passing from the interior to the exterior of the centrodorsal run, is always entirely
within the substance of the centrodorsal, though it may be only just below its ventral
margin.
Ordinarily the cirrus socket is plane, or is marked with a peripheral row of
tubercles, and is in every way comparable to the so-called syzygy in the stem of
the pentacrinities just beneath the nodals, and to the articulation between the larval
comatulid stem and the developing centrodorsal (figs. 192, 194, p. 237, 203, 207,
p- 239, and 208-216, p. 241). But in the species of the genera of the Atelecrinide
(figs. 123, p. 192, 124, 125, p. 193, 218, 223, p. 243, 227, p. 245, and 573, 574, pl. 8),
and in a few other forms, this syzygy is not developed, the articulation between the
cirri and the centrodorsal being of the same type as that found between the individual
cirrus segments (fig. 587, pl. 13), or between the columnals in the bourgueticrinoid
type of stem (fig. 139, p. 205), and consisting of two ligament masses, one on either
side of a fuleral transverse ridge.
The dorsal pole, or apex, of the centrodorsal is always bare of cirri (figs. 146-150,
p- 220, 171-173, p. 231, and 191, 193, 195, 197, p. 237), and is usually flat or more
or less concave, though it may be slightly convex, especially in small species. While
most commonly smooth, it may be slightly pitted (figs. 199, 201, p. 239), or studded
with fine spines or papille (figs. 191, 193, 197, 198, p. 237, 203, 205, 206, p. 239, and
214, p. 241), or even with large tubercles (figs. 189, 190, p. 235). In lateral profile the
sides of the centrodorsal are seen to be always more or less convergent distally, unless
the centrodorsal be very thin, while the ventral outline, as well as the outline of
the bare dorsal pole, is always more or less pentagonal (though occasionally almost
circular), and may be sharply stellate. Usually the sides of the centrodorsal are
everywhere uniform in character (figs. 146-150, p. 220, 171-174, p. 231, 183-188,
p- 235, and 219-222, 224-226, p. 243), but sometimes the surface is broken up into
five radial areas by elongate-triangular bare interradial spaces (figs. 208-213, p. 241),
interradial furrows (fig. 123, p. 192), or strong interradial ridges (figs. 191-194, p. 237,
203, 204, p. 239, 214-216, p. 241, 227, p. 245, and 558, pl. 5), which may be supple-
mented by similar but less prominent structures situated in the midradial line (figs.
203, p. 239, and 227, p. 245), in the latter case dividing the centrodorsal into 10 defi-
nite areas, 2, a right and a left, in each radius. The cirri may thus be evenly dis-
tributed over its surface (except at the dorsal pole), or may be segregated into 5 or
10 radial areas (very rarely occurring in a single column in the midradial line) (fig.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. Zoi
Fig. 174.
Fie. 176.
Fig. 177.
Fig, 175,
Fic. 179. Fic. 180.
Fie. 178.
Fics. 171-180.—171, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL AND RADIALS OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PINGUIS FROM SOUTHERN
JAPAN. 172, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL AND RADIALS OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PINGUIS FROM SOUTHERN
JAPAN. 173, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS BENNETTI FROM THE PELEW ISLANDs.
174, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS BENNETTI FROM THE PELEW ISLANDS. 175, THE
CENTRODORSAL, RADIALS AND IBR) OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, SHOWING
THE LAST STAGES IN THE REDUCTION OF THE CIRRI (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 176, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL
OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, SHOWING AN APPROACH TO THE PERFECTED
COUNTERSUNK STELLATE TYPE (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 177, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF
COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P, H. CARPENTER). 178, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRO-
DORSAL AND RADIALS OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P,. H. CARPENTER),
179, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER
P.H.CARPENTER). 180, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIP-
PINE ISLANDS (AFTER P, H, CARPENTER).
232 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
207, p. 239); they may also be suppressed except at the interradial angles (figs. 79,
p. 132, and 152, p. 221), or may be suppressed in the midradial line (fig. 196, p. 237), ~
or may even be absent altogether (figs. 162, p. 223, and 164, p. 227); it occasionally
happens that they only occur on half of the periphery of the centrodorsal (fig. 78,
SUSHI)
cs a some cases the obsolescent cirrus sockets, after losing their cirri, instead of
regenerating new cirri give rise to more or less elongated jointed tubercles which, if
the dorsal pole of the centrodorsal is spinous, may have a similarly spinous surface.
Occasionally these are not developed as jointed tubercles, but as attached processes
with their bases entirely filling the area originally occupied by the cirrus socket.
Both of these types must be regarded as the equivalent of an entire cirrus reduced
through degeneration to a single segment.
The centrodorsal is ventrally in close apposition to the radials all around, at
least in the more central portion, the only break being in the interradial angles
where the basal rays, the small rounded or rhombic ends of which are externally
visible, may come between them (figs. 194, p. 237, 203, p. 239, and 208-216,
p- 241).
In many species of the Comasteridx, perhaps in most of the larger forms, and
in many species belonging to other families, most noticeable in the Zenometrine,
Thalassometride, and Charitometride, deep narrow clefts extend mward between
the dorsal surface of the radials and the ventral surface of the centrodorsal (figs.
166-169, p. 229, 172, p. 231, 194, p. 237, 203, 204, p. 239, and 208-216, p. 241).
These clefts are most obvious in those comasterids in which the centrodorsal is
reduced to a stellate plate, and sunken below the dorsal surface of the radials.
They terminate inwardly against the inner portion of the ventral surface of the cen-
trodorsal, which is in close apposition with the inner portion of the dorsal surface of
the radial pentagon, and thus form blind cavities strictly homologous, as suggested
by P. H. Carpenter, with the smaller so-called interarticular pores in the stems of
the pentacrinites (fig. 127, p. 197; in the upper third of column). As the basal
rays always maintain the same relative length, they form externally five conspicuous
bridges separating those clefts in the interradial angles (figs. 194, p. 237, 214,
p- 241).
P. H. Carpenter noticed that the ventral surface of the centrodorsal, which is
applied to the radials, is divided by ridges or grooves into the five trapezoidal areas
in which the radials are lodged, and that these are occasionally marked, toward
their inner borders, with more or less definite pits which receive the ends of the
radial axial canals (figs. 259, 260, p. 255, 262, p. 257, 280-283, p. 261, 593, pl. 15).
In most comatulids every two fosse are separated by one of the five basal grooves
which lodge the basal star (figs. 243-249, p. 251); but if no basal star be present,
as in most of the macrophreate species, the radial fosse on the centrodorsal are
usually separated by moderately sharp ridges (figs. 280-283, p. 261).
Internally the centrodorsal is excavated into a deep cavity for the reception
of the chambered organ and associated structures, and the ventral edge, especially
in the Macrophreata, is usually all around more or less produced inward so as to
result in the formation of a lip somewhat overlapping the central cavity after the
manner of a velum or diaphragm (figs. 66, 67, p. 93).
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 2o0
The inner surface is studded with small openings which are the inner ends of
canals leading from the inner cavity to the centers of the cirrus sockets exteriorly,
AS y
=a \\ x QS
Fig. 181. VE 3
ey
eS
YE
TT Doms
On
Wn OM
fee RE Lend
Fig. 182.
Figs. 181-182.—181, DORSAL VIEW OF THE YOUNGEST SPECIMEN OF COMATULA ROTALARIA OBTAINED BY THE CHALLENGER,”
SHOWING THE FUNCTIONAL CIRRI (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 182, DORSAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA,
SHOWING CIRRI PRESENT IN ONLY TWO OF THE INTERRADIAL ANGLES OF THE CENTRODORSAL (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
and are continued into the cirri (figs. 66-68, p. 93). In Antedon bifida these canals
average, according to W. B. Carpenter, ;45 inch in diameter, but they are pro-
portionally larger in species having larger cirri. Most commonly the walls of this
79146°—Bull. 82—15—16
234 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
interior cavity are nearly or quite flat, or regularly curved, but in many comatulids
they are marked by strong ribs alternating in position with the columns of per-
forations through which pass the cirrus canals, “the lower ends of which are more
or less distinctly visible through the central opening, projecting beneath its lip,
which they help to support. Five of them, those in the interradial angles, are
often considerably larger than the rest, and may be the only ones visible. In other
cases, however, both these and numerous smaller intermediate ribs are visible
through the central opening. These ribs are much more distinct in some individ-
uals than in others of the same species.”’
The recent comatulids are at once divisible into two great classes, one including
genera in which the central cavity of the centrodorsal is typically very large and
deep with usually a prominent ventral lip (figs. 66, p. 93, and 286-291, p. 262), the
other containing genera in which it is very small and shallow, with little or no lip
(figs. 68, p. 93, and 250-255, p. 253). The first division, constituting the sub-
order Macrophreata, comprises the families Antedonide, Atelecrinide and Pen-
tametrocrinide, and the latter, known as the suborder Oligophreata, includes the
families Comasteride, Zygometride, Himerometride, Stephanometride, Maria-
metride, Colobometride, Tropiometride, Calometride, Thalassometride, and
Charitometride.
Usually species may be referred at once to one or other of these two groups by
a glance at the cavity of the centrodorsal; but caution must always be used, for
very large specimens of some macrophreate forms, and certain large species, in-
crease the outer walls of the centrodorsal faster than they excavate the central
cavity, and hence approach in appearance the oligophreate forms (figs. 67, p. 93,
and 297, p. 263), while small and immature oligophreate specimens, or the less
specialized species, may at first glance appear to be macrophreate (fig. 235, p. 249).
The Comasteride are remarkable for the great diversity in the size of the centro-
dorsal, even within the limits of a single genus, sometimes even within the compass
of asingle species. In some forms, as in Comanthus bennetti or C. pinguis (figs. 171-
174, p. 231), it is very large and hemispherical with a small strongly concave
dorsal pole, and bears several more or less irregular alternating rows of cirrus sockets
which are large and crowded, resembling somewhat the centrodorsal of some of the
large species of Heliometra or Florometra (figs. 225, 226, p. 243); in other species,
as in Comatula micraster, Capillaster macrobrachius, Comaster typica, and Comantheria
polycnemis, it is reduced to a small pentagonal or stellate plate, devoid of the least
trace of cirrus sockets and countersunk so that its flat dorsal surface is even with
that of the radial cirelet or even slightly below it, from which it is separated by
deep and narrow clefts, bridged over by the ends of the basal rays (figs. 162, p.
223, 164, p. 227, and 166-170, p. 229). All gradations between the two extremes
are found; but the centrodorsal in the Comasteridx is exclusively of some type
between these two extremes and never becomes conical or columnar as is frequently
the case in other families, nor are the cirri (except in a single aberrant genus) ever
arranged in columns.
The transition between the large hemispherical centrodorsal of Comanthus
bennetti or C. pinguis and the small stellate disk of Comaster typica is effected simply
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. Zao
Fig. 187.
Fie, 189,
Figs. 183-190.—183, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF AMPHIMETRA DISCOIDEA FROM QUEENSLAND. 184,
LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL AND RADIALS OF A SPECIMEN OF AMPHIMETRA DISCOIDEA FROM QUEENSLAND. 185,
DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF HETEROMETRA QUINDUPLICAVA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS
(AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 186, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF HETEROMETRA QUINDUPLICAVA
FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P. H, CARPENTER). 187, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF
PTILOMETRA MULLERI FROM SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES. 188, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL AND RADIALS OF A
SPECIMEN OF PTILOMETRA MULLERI FROM SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES. 189, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A
SPECIMEN OF ASTEROMETRA MACROPODA FROM SOUTHWESTERN JAPAN. 190, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL, BASAL
RAYS AND RADIALS OF A SPECIMEN OF ASTEROMETRA MACROPODA FROM SOUTHWESTERN JAPAN,
236 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
by a progressive decrease in the height, resulting from a planing off, by resorption,
of the dorsal pole; this results, owing to the hemispherical outline, in a progressive
broadening of the dorsal pole, which at the same time becomes flatter, and in the
elimination, one by one of the rows of cirrus sockets, so that the centrodorsal finally
becomes a broad flat disk with a single, often more or less deficient, irregular mar-
ginal row of cirrus sockets; the process continuing further, this disk becomes thinner,
the cirri, one by one drop off, the sockets close up, and the disk then begins to
decrease in diameter, finally retreating within the circlet of radials and sinking so
that the dorsal surface of the radials and of the centrodorsal both rest in a common
plane (figs. 152, 154-156, p. 221). In extreme cases the radial margin of the disk
is resorbed and becomes more and more concave, the interradial portion always
reaching to the ends of the basal rays, until a small thin sharply stellate plate
results (figs. 157-159, p. 221).
The suppression of the cirri follows exactly the same lines as their development;
they first disappear one by one from the midradial region of the centrodorsal (fig.
531, pl. 2); an incipient stage of this process is frequently noticed in certain of the
Thalassometride (compare figs. 196 and 198, p. 237); then the whole of the radial
region becomes affected, so that the cirri are reduced to the interradial portions,
occurring, singly or in pairs, just beneath the interradial angles of the calyx; this
condition is permanently retained in the adult of Comatula purpurea (fig. 79, p.
132), and is often noticed, as an individual variation, in many of the species in
which the cirri are normally lost in the adult, as for instance, in Comanthina schlegelit
and in Comaster belli; at last these interradial cirri begin to drop away, so that only
one cirrus is left in each interradial angle, and finally all the cirri are discarded.
P. H. Carpenter notes that the ventral surface of the centrodorsal of Comanthus
parvicirra is 10-sided or nearly so (figs. 243-245, and 247-249, p. 251), and is not
marked by shallow radial depressions hike those seen on the ventral surface of the
centrodorsal of Antedon (figs. 280, 281, 283, p. 261, and 593, pl. 15). The radial
areas rise very slightly from their peripheral to their central margins, and are
marked by various indistinct ridges and furrows. Their sides rise towards the
five interradial elevations which, though not very much raised above the general
surface of the plate, are nevertheless very distinct; for they are wide and marked
by shallow grooves which occupy the greater part of their width, so that the sim-
ple ridge, as seen in Hathrometra (fig. 290, p. 262) and Leptometra (fig. 287, p. 262),
is here represented by the two sides of the groove which is cut out along its median
line. In Antedon these sides meet at a very short distance from the central end of
the groove, so as to obliterate it (fig. 285, pl. 261). In Comanthus parvicirra, how-
ever, they approach one another very gradually, and only just meet within the
margin of the plate (figs. 243-245, and 247-249, p. 251); but the ridge formed
by their fusion does not end here as in Antedon, for it is continued a short dis-
tance beyond the general surface of the plate so as to appear as a short process
extending outwards from the angle between two sides of its external pentagonal
margin. Consequently these five short processes appear on the dorsal aspect of
the plate, prolonging its angles outward. The grooves which are thus cut out
along the median line of the interradial elevations on the ventral surface of the
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 237
centrodorsal in the Comasteride and in other comatulids are of no little importance,
for there lie in them the five rays of the basal star, which is in close connection with
the dorsal surface of the radial pentagon. As a general rule these interradial ele-
———— ( Sy
Oe
oh AY
Fig, 198.
Fia. 197.
Figs, 191-198.—191, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF STENOMETRA DORSATA FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN.
192, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL AND RADIALS OF A SPECIMEN OF STENOMETRA DORSATA FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN,
193, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF STYLOMETRA SPINIFERA FROM CUBA. 194, LATERAL VIEW OF
THE CENTRODORSAL, BASAL RAYS AND RADIALS OF A SPECIMEN OF STYLOMETRA SPINIFERA FROM CUBA, 195, DORSAL VIEW
OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF THALASSOMETRA HAWAIENSIS FROM THE HAWAMAN ISLANDS. 196, LATERAL VIEW
OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF THALASSOMETRA HAWAIIENSIS FROM THE HAWANANISLANDS. 197, DORSAL VIEW
OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF THALASSOMETRA VILLOSA FROM THE WESTERN ALEUTIAN ISLANDS. 198, LATERAL
VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF THALASSOMETRA VILLOSA FROM THE WESTERN ALEUTIAN ISLANDS.
vations and interradial grooves are, like the rays of the basal star, entirely devoid
of pigment, which is, however, very abundant in the organic base of the calcareous
reticulation composing the rest of the ventral surface of the plate, so that when
938 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
this is first exposed by the removal of the centrodorsal from the dorsal surface of
the radial pentagon which rests upon it, five white rays are visible on a dark back-
ground. Unless the plate is immediately removed from the alkaline solution used
to effect its separation this distinction in color between the radial and the inter-
radial portions of its ventral surface rapidly disappears, owing to the destruction
of the pigments contained in the former.
The development of these basal grooves is not only different in different speci-
mens of the various species of comatulids (figs. 229-234, p. 247, 235-242, p. 249, and
243-249, p. 251), especially among the Comasterid, but it varies to a certain extent
in the same individual (fig. 248, p. 251). Sometimes one or more of the basal grooves
may rapidly diminish in width and end well within the periphery of the centro-
dorsal (figs. 243, 248, p. 251). They may gradually diminish (fig. 259, p. 255), or,
more rarely, gradually increase (fig. 229, p. 247), from tle center to the periphery,
or the sides may be quite parallel (figs. 266, p. 257, and 268, 270, p. 259); but usually
they increase slightly in diameter for a shorter or longer distance, tapering off
gradually from this point toward the periphery, thus having, as expressed by
Carpenter, a leaflike appearance (figs. 244-249, p. 251).
Except for very small forms such as Comatilia iridometriformis, Comanthus
bennetti and C. pinguis (figs. 171-174, p. 231) are the only species in the Comasteride
in which the centrodorsal develops throughout life and shows but little trace of
progressive specialization in the adult stage; nm most of the other species the centro-
dorsal is discoidal (figs. 160-162, p. 223, 163, p. 225, and 181, 182, p. 233), though it
may be rather thick, with a broad flat polar area and two or three marginal rows
of cirrus sockets bearing functional cirri which in some cases, as in Comanthus
parvicirra, may be disproportionately small (figs. 160, p. 223, and 182, p. 233) or, as in
©. trichoptera, disproportionately slender and thin (fig. 330, p. 281). A number of
species commonly have the centrodorsal a very thin disk with a single row of cirrus
sockets which may be regularly (as in Comatula purpurea) or irregularly (as in
Comanthus parvicirra) incomplete (figs. 79, p. 132, and 182, p. 233); others when
adult usually have the centrodorsal without cirri and pentagonal or stellate, but
frequently with one or two or even more perfect cirri remaining, as Comanthus
annulata, Comanthina schlegelii or Comaster belli (fig. 182, p. 233); and a consider-
able number always when adult have the centrodorsal small and stellate with never
a trace of cirri, as Comatula rotalaria, Comaster typica, Capillaster macrobrachius,
and Comantheria polycnemis (figs. 153-159, p. 221, 162, p. 223, 164, p. 227, and 166,
168-170, p. 229).
When very young, all the species of the Comasteride have centrodorsals exactly
like those of Antedon, and in all species alike they develop in exactly the same way.
The difference in the centrodorsals of the adults is therefore solely a difference in
comparative development, demonstrating a fundamental unity, and not a difference
in structure, implying a phylogenetic divergence. For instance, the large hemi-
spherical centrodorsals of Comanthus bennetti or C. pinguis are merely centrodorsals
of the most primitive comasterid type which, though greatly increased in size,
are not ontogenetically different from the centrodorsals of the early post-penta-
crinoid stage; the centrodorsals of Comactinia or of Comissia, discoidal, with one
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 239
Fig, 207.
Fics, 199-207.—199, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PARAMETRA ALBOFLAVA FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN.
200, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL AND RADIALS OF A SPECIMEN OF PARAMETRA ALBOFLAVA FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN.
201, DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PARAMETRA ORION FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN. 202, LATERAL
VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PARAMETRA ORION FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN. 203, LATERAL VIEW OF THE
CENTRODORSAL AND RADIALS OF A SPECIMEN OF THALASSOMETRA GIGANTEA FROM THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS, 204, LATERAL
VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL AND RADIALS OF THE TYPE SPECIMEN OF COSMIOMETRA CONIFERA FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN. 205,
LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF STIREMETRA ARACHNOIDES FROM QUEENSLAND, 206, DORSAL
VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF CRINOMETRA CONCINNA FROM CUBA, 207, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRO-
DORSAL AND RADIALS OF A SPECIMEN OF CHLOROMETRA ROBUSTA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, SHOWING THE CIRRUS SOCKETS
IN SINGLE MIDRADIAL COLUMNS.
240 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
or at most two rows of cirri, represent an advanced stage of comasterid centrodorsal
development (though the arm structure in these two genera is much less specialized
than in Comanthus), while the stellate centrodorsals of Comaster typica or of Capil-
laster macrobrachius are of the most specialized type.
It is a curious fact, though one finding innumerable parallels, that in all of the
genera of the Comasteride the centrodorsal starts, so far as we know, from exactly
the same condition in the young, and develops along exactly the same lines; in
Comanthus all the stages are found in the adults of the various species, but in the
other genera the sum of the species taken together covers only a comparatively
small part of the entire developmental line.
If we take the line of development of the comasterid centrodorsal and divide
it into four parts, marking the division points A, B, C, and D, A being the Comanthus
bennetti type (figs. 171, 174, p. 231) (under which, in effect, all the very small species
such as Comatilia iridometriformis are included, as would be expected); D the small
stellate Comaster typica type (figs. 157-159, p. 221), B (figs. 146-148, p. 220) and C
(figs. 160, 161, p. 223, and 163, p. 225) intermediates, we find that Comactinia, Lep-
tonemaster, Neocomatella, Comissia and Nemaster all fall between B and C; Cominia
falls in B; Comatella extends from A to C; Comanthus from A to D; Capillaster from
B to D; and Comatula and Comaster from C to D. Palzocomatella is essentially
like Neocomatella, though it exhibits a tendency toward a columnar arrangement of
the cirrus sockets.
It is interesting to note that, except for the very small species of Comatilia
and Microcomatula, which are scarcely to be considered in this connection, the
West Indian comasterids and the comasterids occurring on the Atlantic coasts of
Africa are restricted in regard to the development of the centrodorsal to the interval
B-C, whereas those of the central East Indian region and of the more northern
portions of Australia range from A to D with the emphasis, in Australia, on the D;
of other regions, the northwest and southeast African comasterids range only
between B and C like the West Indian, while the southern Japanese range from
A to C.
It is evident from the tabulation given above that the comasterid genera which
show the most specialization in other characters have also the most specialization
in their centrodorsals, and also that extreme specialization, either in the direction
of a retention of a larval type of centrodorsal, or of very great reduction in the
size of that plate, is confined to the areas where extreme specialization in other
characters occurs.
In the Innatantes the central plate is not comparable to the centrodorsal of
the other comatulids (figs. 565, 572, pl. 7); I believe it to be the homologue of the
terminal stem plate plus all the columnals of the other comatulids. I am led to this
belief from the following circumstances: It lies in the body wall flush with the infra-
basals, and therefore can not be a columnal, for in all stalked crinoids the topmost
columnal supports more or less of the lower margin of the basals or of the under-
basals; this is a mechanical necessity, as otherwise the weight of all the calcareous
structures would have to be taken up by the soft interior structures immediately
above the stem, and by the sutures between the topmost columnal and the
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 241
. Fic, 213.
Fig. 211. Fig. 212,
Fie. 214.
Fics. 208-216.—208, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PSATHYROMETRA CONGESTA FROM THE HLAWATIAN
IsLaNDS. 209, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PSATHYROMETRA FRAGILIS FROM NORTHERN JAPAN.
210, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PSATHYROMETRA PROFUNDORUM FROM QUEEN CHARLOTTE
ISLANDS. 211, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PSATHYROMETRA BOREALIS FROM THE WESTERN
ALEUTIAN ISLANDS. 212, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A FULLY GROWN SPECIMEN OF PSATHYROMETRA ERY-
THRIZON FROM THE SEA OF JAPAN. 213, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SMALL SPECIMEN OF PSATHYROMETRA
ERYTHRIZON FROM THE SEA OF JAPAN, 214, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF ZENOMETRA TRISERI-
ALIS FROM THE HAWAMNAN ISLANDS, 215, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF ZENOMETRA COLUMNARIS
FROM GEORGIA. 216, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF ZENOMETRA COLUMNARIS FROM GEORGIA.
242 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
basals or infrabasals; as the infrabasals of the young Antedon and the coronal
plates of the urchins surround the apical system in just the way that the infra-
basals of Marsupites (fig. 565, pl. 7) and of Uintacrinus (fig. 572, pl. 7) surround
the central plates, it seems to me that we must assume that the central plates are
the equivalents of the entire apical system (the terminal stem plate plus the
columnals) of the developing Antedon.
There is additional evidence that neither Marsupites nor Uintacrinus ever
possessed a stalk; this evidence is purely circumstancial, but appears to be none
the less good. Both Marsupites and Uintacrinus have an enormous range; now
we find among the jellyfishes forms which are purely pelagic, and other forms
which are fixed for varying periods. The extent of the range of these different
types is very varied, the pelagic species having the greatest, and the longest fixed
the least, range. When we compare the distribution of Marsupites and Ujinta-
crinus With that of the recent jellyfishes we find that the parallel is distinctly with
those types which are exclusively pelagic and pass through no fixed stage, and we
therefore appear to be justified in assuming that Marswpites and Uintacrinus, like
them, were always at all stages free swimming.
All of the numerous and diverse types of centrodorsals are ultimately derived,
both phylogenetically and ontogenetically, from the type characteristic of the
comasterids, and the segregation of the cirrus sockets into columns, with the accom-
panying assumption of strong interradial ridges or furrows and of a more or less
pronouncedly conical shape, commences after the centrodorsal has attained an
appreciable size. In most cases all evidence of the early stages is lost through
the erosion or resorption of the dorsal pole, but in certain small species of Psathy-
rometra, as for instance in Ps. inusitata (fig. 228, p. 245), the juvenile portion of the
centrodorsal with its alternating rows of cirrus sockets which show no trace of
radial segregation, but resemble those of the genus Trichometra, is retained beyond
the mature portion in which the cirrus sockets are in columns and the columns are
grouped into radial areas by the development of definite furrows.
When the centrodorsal is of the primitive type it increases in size proportion-
ately with an increase in the length and stoutness of the cirri; thus in the Comaste-
ride, Zygometride, Himerometride, Stephanometride, Mariametride, Colobome-
tride, Tropiometride, Calometridx, and Pentametrocrinide, and in the genera of the
Antedonidx in which the primitive type of centrodorsal is retained, the species with
small cirri have small centrodorsals, and those with large cirri have large centro-
dorsals; but if the cirri are arranged in definite columns the reverse is, within
certain limits, true; species with small and short cirri have larger centrodorsals
than those with longer and larger cirri; thus the species of Thalassometrid® and
Atelecrinide have much smaller and more sharply conical centrodorsals than those
of the Charitometride, while the species of Zenometrine have, in proportion to
their size, the smallest centrodorsals of any of the Antedonide.
This fact is not always easy of appreciation, for as a rule species with a columnar
arrangement of cirrus sockets do not lose nearly so much of the dorsal pole by
resorption as those with the cirrus sockets arranged in alternating rows, and hence
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 243
the centrodorsal is relatively longer; again the radical resorption may be, as in
Zenometra (figs. 214-216, p. 241) and in Balanometra, entirely restricted to the
midradial areas, leaving the interradial areas standing up as high ridges and
making the centrodorsal appear far larger than it really is.
Fig. 217.
Fig, 218.
Fi. 223.
Fria. 225. Fia, 226.
Figs. 217-226.—217, DoRSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF ZENOMETRA COLUMNARIS FROM GEORGIA. 218,
LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF ATELECRINUS BALANOIDES FROM PorTO Rico. 219, DORSAL VIEW
OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF LEPTOMETRA CELTICA (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 220, LATERAL VIEW OF THE
CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF TRICHOMETRA VEXATOR FROM THE HAWAMAN ISLANDS. 221, LATERAL VIEW OF THE
CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF TRICHOMETRA ASPERA FROM GEORGIA. 222, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A
SPECIMEN OF TRICHOMETRA OBSCURA FROM SOUTHERN INDIA. 223, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN
OF ATELECRINUS CONIFER FROM THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS. 224, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF
TRICHOMETRA EXPLICATA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. 225 DORSAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF
FLOROMETRA ASPERRIMA FROM ALASKA. 226, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF FLOROMETRA
ASPERRIMA FROM ALASKA.
In the families Zygometride (figs. $3, p. 136, and 84, p. 137), Himerometride
(figs. 85, p. 139, 86, p. 141, and 184-186, p. 235), Stephanometride, Mariamet-
ride (fig. 432, p. 349), Colobometride (fig. 87, p. 143), Tropiometride (figs. 88,
p. 145, and 303, p. 264), and Calometride (fig. 89, p. 147) the centrodorsal is
244 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
discoidal, always cirriferous, varying from thin to thick, the dorsal pole always
somewhat smaller than the base, the sloping sides slightly convex; the dorsal pole
is usually smooth, sometimes faintly pitted, and is most commonly flat or more
or less concave, less frequently, and usually only in small species, more or less
convex; the cirrus sockets are large and crowded, and are arranged in from one
to three of four (but mostly in one or two) alternating rows; the central cavity
of the centrodorsal is comparatively small. In these families the centrodorsal
has reached the same stage of development, and is practically the same throughout
all the species; it furnishes (except in regard to the excavation for the basal rays,
which will be explained later) no valid systematic characters; though the number
of rows of cirri, the comparative concavity or convexity of the dorsal pole, and the
occasional markings on its surface are in some cases good specific indices, none of
them can be relied upon. Like the size of the central cavity, the size of the cirrus
sockets, and the proportionate size of the dorsal pole and consequent angle which
the sides make with the base, they are sometimes useful as a supplement to char-
acters exhibited by other structures; but at the best they are uncertain, in respect
to both generic and specific differentiation.
In the Thalassometride (figs. 938, p. 153, 94, p. 155, 95, p. 157, 96, 97, p.
159, 187-190, p. 235, 191-198, p. 237, and 199-205, p. 239) and in the Charito-
metride (figs. 99, p. 160, and 206, 207, p. 239) the case is quite different; here
the centrodorsal takes on a considerable variety of form and becomes of great
importance, both generically and specifically. In the Thalassometride the centro-
dorsal is usually rounded-conical, but less than twice as high as broad at the base,
and the lateral surface is usually separated by more or less pronounced interradial
ridges into five radial areas, each of which contains usually two, more rarely three,
definite columns of cirrus sockets. The dorsal pole is usually small, and, though
sometimes flat, is usually ornamented in some way, either pitted or thickly covered
with small tubercles or spines, and the interradial ridges and the inferior margin
are often similarly ornamented.
In Ptilometra (figs. 93, p. 153, .and 187, 188, p. 235) the centrodorsal is very
large, thick discoidal, the sides only slightly oblique, the dorsal pole broad and
flat; the cirrus sockets are arranged in two or three crowded alternating rows in
one species, while in the other the rows tend to lie directly under each other, so
that the cirri are nearly or quite in 15 columns, three to each radial area, though
the radial areas are not in any way marked off, and the columns are closely
crowded against each other.
In Asterometra (figs. 43, p. 77, 94, p. 155, and 189, 190, p. 235) and in Ptero-
metra the centrodorsal varies from long conical to columnar, being usually columnar
basally with the portion beyond the cirrus sockets conical, the very small polar
area with five rounded tubercles which are radial in position; the sides are more
or less flattened, and are divided into five radial areas by broad and more or less
deep grooves or furrows, each radial area containing two columns of cirrus sockets
of from two to (rarely) four each, which are separated from each other by narrower
and less prominent (midradial) grooves than those delimiting the radial areas.
This type of centrodorsal is essentially like that found in the larger and more spe-
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS,
245
Figs. 227-228.—227,
22i,
THE GREATLY REDUCED BASALS, AND THE CONICAL CENTRODORSAL WITH STRONG I
LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PSATHYROMETRA INUSITATA FROM NEAR THE PosTILLon I
SHOWING THE CHANGE IN THE ARRANGEMENT OF THE CIRRUS SOCKETS FROM ALTERNATING ROWS TO DEFINITE SEGREGATED
COLUMNS.
246 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
cialized species of Thalassometra (such as T. gigantea) (fig. 203, p. 239), and is the
most perfected derivative from the thalassometrid line of development.
In Thalassometra, Agalaometra, and Horzometra (figs. 195-198, p. 237, and 203,
p. 239) the centrodorsal is comparatively small and conical, with the lateral sur-
face divided into five radial areas by low rounded ridges, which are sometimes sup-
plemented by five similar but smaller ridges in the midradial line; these ridges are
the result of the resorption of the surface of the centrodorsal, which progresses
much faster in the radial areas than in the interradial areas, and thus leaves the
latter standing out as more or less prominent ridges; the cirrus sockets are arranged
in 10 (very rarely 15) columns of two or three each, these columns being always close
to the interradial ridges and often more or less separated interiorly, possibly as a
result of the suppression of a primitive median column; occasionally a more or less
complete third column is found in this midradial gap. The small dorsal pole is
usually tubercular or finely spinous, and the interradial ridges and inferior margin
are also commonly spinous. The central cavity appears large, but when the pro-
portionately small size of the centrodorsal as a whole is taken into consideration
it is found to be in reality relatively small.
Stylometra (figs. 193, 194, p. 237) and Crotalometra have centrodorsals resem-
bling those of Thalassometra; but that of Stylometra is rather more spinous, —
especially at the dorsal pole, than those of any species of Thalassometra, while that
of most of the species of Crotalometra is rather larger, smooth, and more definitely
conical, sometimes being more or less columnar basally, like that of Asterometra.
In Stenometra (figs. 191, 192, p. 237) the centrodorsal is small, truncated conical
or more or less columnar, with the interradial ridges usually very strongly developed
and supplemented by radial ridges, which are sometimes very prominent; the cirrus
sockets are arranged in 10 definite and well separated columns of two or three each.
Stiremetra (fig. 205, p. 239) has the centrodorsal small, hemispherical or bluntly
conical, the dorsal pole more or less papillose; the cirrus sockets are arranged in
two or three columns of one or two each in each radial area, though the columns
are not especially differentiated.
The centrodorsal of Cosmiometra (fig. 204, p. 239) is essentially like that of
Thalassometra, but it is usually more rounded, the sides making a rather greater
angle with each other, and the dorsal pole being proportionately smaller; the radial
ridges also not so well marked.
Parametra (figs. 199-202, p.239) has a proportionately larger and broader, though
lower, centrodorsal than any other genus in the family; it is low hemispherical or
more or less discoidal, with a broad dorsal pole, instead of inclining to conical as
usual. The cirrus sockets show more or less irregularity of arrangement, but are
usually in two rows, and approximately in 10 or 15 columns. Taken as a whole,
the centrodorsal of Parametra is much more like the type prevailing in the Charito-
metride than like that found in the Thalassometride, and the short, comparatively
stout, cirri help to increase the resemblance.
In the Charitometride (figs. 99, p. 160, 100, p. 162, 101, 102, p. 163, and 206, 207,
p. 239) the centrodorsal is broad, and varies from thin discoidal to thick discoidal
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 247
Fria. 230.
Fig. 229.
Fi. 232.
Fie. 233. Fic. 234.
Fias. 229-234.—229, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATELLA NIGRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS,
230, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATELLA STELLIGERA (AFTER P, H. CARPENTER). 231,
VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF NEMASTER LINEATA FROM BRAZIL, WITH THE ROSETTE AND TWO
RADIALS IN POSITION (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 232, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF NEMASTER
INSOLITUS FROM THE LESSER ANTILLES. 233, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF NEOCOMATELLA
ALATA FROM CUBA. 234, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF LEPTONEMASTER VENUSTUS FROM THE
WEST COAST OF FLORIDA.
248 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
or truncated hemispherical. The cirrus sockets are usually somewhat larger than
in the Thalassometrid, and are arranged in from one to three more or less irregu-
lar rows which may be alternating, but usually show more or less of an approach
to a columnar disposition, three columns to each radial area (instead of two as is
mostly the case among the Thalassometride), of which the median may be wanting
(very rarely the two lateral), leaving a broad bare space between the remaining
columns. The dorsal pole is broad and flat and more or less deeply sculptured,
but there is no other ornamentation, except in Crinometra (fig. 206, p. 239), where
the dorsal pole, the surface of the centrodorsal between the cirrus sockets, and its
inferior border are usually covered with fine spines or tubercles corresponding in
character with those on the radials. In the cases where definite radial areas are
discernable they are delimited merely by more or less broad areas bare of cirrus
sockets, these being in the most extreme cases only slightly more convex than the
remaining surface of the centrodorsal, and never rising into prominent ridges as in
the Thalassometride.
The generic differentiation shown in the centrodorsals of the Charitometrid is
a useful supplement to determination based upon other characters, though used
alone it is somewhat uncertain. Owing to the proportionately large size of the
centrodorsal (resulting from the comparatively small amount of that surface resorp-
tion which is carried to an extreme in the Thalassometride) the central cavity is
relatively small.
The large, usually highly spinous or tubercular, centrodorsals in Crinometra,
as well as the more or less definite arrangement of the cirrus sockets upon them,
make the identification of the species of that genus comparatively easy; Pachy-
lometra and Glyptometra (fig. 100, p. 162) have very large and thick centrodorsals,
unornamented, the cirrus sockets arranged as in Crinometra (though showing a
tendency to drop out the central column in each radial area), about of the same
size, and about as numerous; these two genera can not be distinguished from each
other by their centrodorsals; Pwcilometra, Charitometra, and Chlorometra (figs. 99,
p- 160, and 207, p. 239) have smaller centrodorsals which are proportionately higher
with smaller polar areas, approaching a low truncated conical or hemispherical
shape. We have not as yet sufficient knowledge of the component species of these
three genera to determine positively whether or not the type of centrodorsal found in
each is characteristic, though in Chlorometra one of the species groups has the cirrus
sockets in a single column in the center of each radial area as a result of the sup-
pression of the two lateral columns. Strotometra (figs. 101, 102, p. 163) has a thinner
centrodorsal than any of the other genera, and it bears fewer cirri, these being in a
single marginal row.
In the Antedonide (figs. 103, p. 165, 104, p. 167, 105, p. 169, 106, p. 171, 107,
p- 173, 108, p. 174, 109, p. 175, 110, p. 176, 111, p. 177, 112, p. 179, 208-216, p. 241, 217,
219-222, 224-226, p. 243, and 228, p. 245), Atelecrinide (figs. 123, p. 192, 124, 125,
p. 193, 218, 223, p. 243, 227, p. 245, and 414, p.319), and Pentametrocrinide (figs. 113,
114, p. 181,119, p. 185, 120, p. 187, and 121, p. 189), which together form the suborder
Macrophreata, the centrodorsal is usually very large and deep, and the inner prox-
imal border is commonly furnished with a well-developed rim extending inward and
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 249
Fic. 235. Fic. 236.
Fie. 239.
Fia. 237.
Fi. 241. Fia. 242.
Fics. 235-242.—235, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATILIA IRIDOMETRIFORMIS FROM THE BAHAMA
ISLANDS. 236, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA PECTINATA FROM SINGAPORE. 237,
VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA SOLARIS FROM AUSTRALIA (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
238, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA SOLARIS FROM AUSTRALIA (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
239, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF CoMATULA ROTALARIA (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 240,
VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA PECTINATA (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 241, VENTRAL
VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMACTINIA ECHINOPTERA FROM CUBA. 242, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRO-
DORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMACTINIA ECHINOPTERA FROM CuBA.
79146°—Bull, 82—15 17
250 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
diminishing the size of the opening of the central cavity. In some extreme cases, as
in Psathyrometra (figs. 208-213, p. 241, 286, p. 262) or in Atelecrinus (figs. 123, p. 192,
124, 125, p. 193, and 300, p. 264), the centrodorsal is but a thin shell surrounding the
chambered organ and associated structures, but usually the walls are moderately
thick; in genera containing species in which the centrodorsal is proportionately large
and broad, as Heliometra (figs. 292, 293, p. 263), Solanometra (fig. 295, p. 263), Pro-
machocrinus (fig. 294, p. 263), and Antedon (figs. 280, 281, 283, p. 261), the central
cavity, though in reality relatively as large as in the others, may appear small by
comparison.
In the groups previously treated, all of which belong to the Oligophreata, the
centrodorsal in the adult stage has undergone more or less resorption at the dorsal
pole and along the lateral faces which has resulted, owing to its hemispherical or
conical shape (the latter a derivation from the more primitive hemispherical shape
by a process of lateral radial resorption), in a progressive proportionate broadening
of the dorsal pole with an elimination of the earlier formed cirrus sockets. New
cirri are only developed between the topmost (proximal) row of cirri present and
the proximal rim of the centrodorsal, and never, except by regeneration, anywhere
else; hence in these groups we have lost a valuable aid in tracing out the phylogeny,
for the earlier and more primitive portion of the centrodorsal, and with it the earlier
cirri, has been lost by resorption. There is commonly an incomplete row of cirrus
sockets below those bearing the typical cirri, which may be more or less obliterated
or may bear cirri with fewer segments than the others; but these less perfect cirri
are so nearly like the perfect type, or so obviously degenerate, as to furnish no basis
for any phylogenetic speculation.
In the Macrophreata, however, the dorsal tip of the centrodorsal is usually
subject to comparatively little resorption, except in the larger species, and even
there this is rarely very extensive. Below the rows of perfect adult cirri there are
rows of sockets of diminishing size which may show progressive obliteration, or may
bear cirri of an entirely different character from the more adult, and of a more
primitive type, these two types being connected by intergrades of all stages (figs.
310, 311, p. 269). In the adults of the species of Antedon, for instance (though in
this genus there is rather more resorption of the dorsal pole than is usual in the
group), about the dorsal pole there are usually to be found several very small cirri,
with all the mature characters but with fewer and proportionately longer segments
than the others (figs. 312, 313, p. 271), resembling the cirri seen in the earlier free
stages of the animal which, indeed, they are. It is thus possible to trace in a
single adult Antedon all the progressive changes in the cirri from the earliest to the
perfected type, and it is easy to see that the earliest type found in Antedon
resembles the adult type in the species of more primitive genera. In Antedon,
however, the difference between these polar cirri (the ‘‘small mature cirri” of P. H.
Carpenter) and the adult cirri is comparatively small, as the cirri do not alter to
any appreciable extent during the whole life of the animal, and the most primitive
cirri are cut off by resorption; but in some of the species of Nanometra (fig. 310, °
p- 269) or of Hathrometra the polar cirri are only one-fourth the length of the others
and consist of only one-third as many segments, all of which are very slender and
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 251
elongated, in marked contrast to the conditions found in the other cirri, but quite
similar to the conditions found in the large cirri of species of more primitive genera,
and thus indicating the relationships of superficially very different forms.
W. B. Carpenter, speaking of the development of the centrodorsal in Antedon
bifida, says: ‘At the beginning of the unattached stage the centrodorsal has the
Fia. 244.
Fia. 248.
Fias. 243-249.—243, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE
ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 244, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIREA
FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 245, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF
COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 246, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRO-
DORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMASTER FRUTICOSUS FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. 247, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL
OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 248, VENTRAL VIEW
OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
249, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER
P. H. CARPENTER).
form of a basin with its lip turned inward; its diameter is about 0.03 inch, and its
height about 0.012 inch. Its basal surface is somewhat depressed in the center,
and here there is for a time distinguishable a minute 5-rayed perforation which
previously formed the communication between the cavity of the basin and the
252 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
central canal that is still left in the upper segments (at least) of the stem. This
perforation, however, is very soon closed up by an extension of the calcareous net-
work, so that no trace of it remains visible externally. Around the stellate aper-
ture is seen a circular series of five sockets for the articulation of the dorsal cirri,
each of them having a pore in its center which is usually at the summit of a minute
elevation. This pore gives passage to a sarcodic thread which proceeds from the
sarcodie axis contained within the cavity of the basin, and runs along the central
canal of the cirrus to its termination. A second series of sockets, alternating in
position with the first, is seen nearer the upper margin of the basin. This margin,
when viewed from above, is somewhat pentagonal; but the opening left by the
inversion of the lip is nearly circular. Throughout the whole period of growth the
increase of the centrodorsal takes place at a greater rate than that of any other
part of the skeleton, so that it soon comes to pass beyond the circlet of basals and
to abut on the proximal edge of the radials; instead of stopping here it continues
to increase in diameter until it conceals the whole inferior surface of the radials,
sometimes encroaching on the first primibrachs. The increase in size from a diam-
eter of 0.05 inch to 0.16 inch, with a corresponding augmentation of its central
cavity is brought about by a continuous deposit of new material on the external
surface and a continual removal of old material from the internal surface. With
this general augmentation in size there is an increase both in the number of sockets
for the articulation of the dorsal cirri and in the size of the individual sockets, and
there is also a marked change in their disposition. I [Carpenter] have not been
able to satisfy myself that after the development of the first two whorls, each con-
sisting of five cirri, any similar regularity is observable in their subsequent mullti-
plication; but since the real origin of each cirrus is in a peduncle of sarcodic sub-
stance put forth from the central axis in the cavity of the centrodorsal basin, and
since the arrangement of the whole aggregate of such peduncles is distinctly verticil-
late, the want of a definite plan in the grouping of the cirri on the external surface
of that plate seems attributable to their very close apposition. The new cirri
always make their appearance between those previously formed and the base of
the calyx, so that their sockets are close to the margin of the basin. The increase
of the cirri in diameter is by no means proportional to the increase in di-
ameter of the centrodorsal, so that not only is space made on its surface for the
augmentation in the number of their sockets from 10 to between 30 and 40,
but a vacancy gradually comes to be left in the central part of the exterior of the
basin which extends with its growth and finally comes to bear a considerable
proportion to its diameter. This vacancy can not be accounted for solely by
the widening out of the innermost circle of sockets by the general growth of the
basin; it is principally due to a progressive loss of the first-formed cirri from within
outward, and the filling up of their sockets with new deposit, concurrently with the
formation of new cirri about the margin. Thus it appears that the total number
of cirri developed during the life of any individual Antedon considerably exceeds
that with which we meet at any one epoch.”
In the Oligophreata the cirri are tenacious, and are seldom to any extent lost
by the process of capture, no matter how rough the treatment accorded them may
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 253
Fic. 250. Fia, 251.
Fig. 253.
Fia, 252.
Fia. 254.
Fias. 250-255.—250, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF EUDIOCRINUS ORNATUS FROM THE ANDAMAN
ISLANDS. 251, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF 4 SPECIMEN OF CATOPTOMETRA HARTLAUBI FROM SOUTHWESTERN
JAPAN. 252, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF ZYGOMETRA COMATA FROM SINGAPORE. 253, VENTRAL
VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF HETEROMETRA QUINDUPLICAVA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P. H.
CARPENTER). 254, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF HIMEROMETRA MARTENSI FROM SINGAPORE.
255, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN oF CRASPEDOMETRA ACUTICIRRA FROM THE ANDAMAN ISLANDS.
254 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
have been; specimens of species of Comasteride or Thalassometridx, as well as of
Himerometrids or Colobometride, may be recovered from a mass of laval or coral
detritus which has been turned over and over in the dredge, and yet have practically
all the cirri intact. This is the more remarkable in the Thalassometride, in which
family the sometimes enormously long cirri are often very slender. But in the
Macrophreata the cirri are deciduous and, besides, very brittle, so that it is very
difficult in many cases to recover any of them at all. This is the-more unfortunate,
as the presence of the smaller apical cirri is such anomalous genera as Psathyro-
metra, Zenometra, Atopocrinus and Atelecrinus would give us a valuable clue to
their systematic affinities.
There is a great difference in the facility with which cirri are lost in different
genera, and this is always correlated with a corresponding facility of fracture in
the brachial syzygies. As a general rule the genera in which there is the most
resorption of the dorsal pole and the most proportionate increase in the thickness
of the walls of the centrodorsal have the most tenacious cirri; but this is to be
expected, since these genera, by these very characters, show the greatest approach
to the Oligophreata. Large species are less likely to lose their cirri easily than
smaller ones in the same genera, and in the same species large specimens are usually
more nearly perfect than smaller ones; but here again the large species or the large
specimens take on certain oligophreate characters. The very small species, again,
are less liable to lose the cirri than the others on account of the immunity conferred
by their size.
Of all the macrophreate comatulids the species belonging to the subfamily
Antedonine are the least liable to loss of cirri, with the species of Perometrine a
more or less close second. The species of Bathymetrine usually have at least some
of the cirri present, although they are quite unknown in one of the species of Bathy-
metra. In the species of Heliometrine cirri are rarely found in place; so far as I
have seen, when taken under ordinary conditions, not more than one in five or six
hundred specimens of the species of Solanometra, Heliometra, or of Hathrometra have
any cirri at all, and I have never seen a single specimen of any species of any one of the
three genera with the cirri perfect, although I have examined probably at least 50,000;
Promachocrinus agrees with Heliometra in this respect, as would be expected, but
the cirri of Zsometra and of Trichometra appear to be somewhat more tenacious,
though the cirri of several species of the latter genus are as yet unknown. This
apparent tenacity may, however, be due in part to the fact that these genera com-
monly inhabit softer bottom. The Thysanometrine are, as a whole, like the Helio-
metrine, though none of them retain the cirri so well as Trichometra; the cirri of
one of the species of Jridometra are unknown. In the Zenometrine, Atelecrinide and
Pentametrocrinide specimens retaining even the basal segments of the cirri are
very rare, so that we are quite ignorant of their structure in half of all the known
species, including three entire genera. Of the seven genera, in only two, containing
two species each, are the cirri adequately understood.
It is a fortunate circumstance that in two of these three groups with very
deciduous cirri the centrodorsal is of the highest systematic value, presenting much
more important characters than the cirri.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 255
Fia. 258. Fig. 259.
Fria. 260. Fig. 261.
Figs. 256-261.—256, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF AMPHIMETRA ENSIFER FROM SINGAPORE. 257,
VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF HETEROMETRA REYNAUDIL FROM CEYLON. 258, VENTRAL VIEW
OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF AMPHIMETRA PHILIBERTI FROM THE ANDAMAN ISLANDS. 259, VENTRAL VIEW
OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF LAMPROMETRA PROTECTUS FROM CEYLON. 260, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRO-
DORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF MARIAMETRA SUBCARINATA FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN. 261, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL
OF A SPECIMEN OF PONTIOMETRA ANDERSONI FROM SINGAPORE.
bo
or
oc
BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
The cirri are arranged in more or less crowded alternating rows in all the
macrophreate genera except in those included in the subfamily Zenometrine (figs.
109, p. 175, 110, p. 176, 111, p. 177, 208-216, p. 241, 228, p. 245, and 558, pl. 5), in
Atopocrinus (fig. 227, p. 245), and in Atelecrinus (figs. 123, p. 192, 124, 125, p. 193,
218, 223, p. 243, 414, p. 319, and 573, 574, pl. 8), where they are arranged in col-
umns. These six genera, therefore, are at once distinguishable from all other
comatulid genera by a glance at the centrodorsal. Moreover, they are at once dis-
tinguishable among themselves; in Atelecrinus (figs. 123, p. 192, 124, 125, p. 193,
218, 223, p. 248, 414, p. 319, and 573, 574, pl. 8) the cirrus sockets are bounded
laterally, or laterally and ventrally, by a strong horseshoe-shaped ridge, or by high
lateral ridges, whereas in the other genera they are mere undifferentiated pits in the
general surface of the centrodorsal; there are 10 or 15 very definite columns of cirrus
sockets, but the surface of the centrodorsal is not marked off into radial areas.
This is the case also in Leptometra (figs. 111, p. 177, and 219, p. 243) and in Adelo-
metra, but in the former they are entirely separated from each other, while in the
latter they are closely crowded.
In Atopocrinus (fig. 227, p. 245) the centrodorsal is very long and sharply
conical and is divided into 10 narrow cirriferous areas by five high serrate inter-
radial and five smaller similarly serrate midradial ridges. Each cirrus socket
projects strongly over the proximal portion of the one just below it and possesses
strong fuleral ridges which are not found in the cirrus sockets of the species of
Zenometrine (figs. 109, p. 175, 110, p. 176, 111, p. 177, 208-216, p. 241, 228, p. 245,
and 558, pl. 5). }
In Balanometra, Zenometra (figs. 109, p. 175, 214-216, p. 241, and 558, pl. 5) and
Psathyrometra (figs. 110, p. 176, 208-213, p. 241, and 228, p. 245) the centrodorsal is
divided into five radial areas by strongly developed ridges, furrows, or broad bare
areas. In Balanometra and in the Atlantic species of Zenometra (figs. 215, 216,
p. 241, and 558, pl. 5) there are 10 columns of cirrus sockets, two in each radial
area; Balanometra has the radial areas marked off by broad furrows, and the two
columns of cirrus sockets in each radial area more or less widely separated,
whereas in the Atlantic species of Zenometra the radial areas are delimited by
strong ridges, and the two columns of cirrus sockets in each radial area are close
together. In the Pacific species of Zenometra (figs. 109, p. 175, and 214, p. 241)
and in Psathyrometra there are three or four columns of cirrus sockets in each
radial area, these radial areas being marked off by bare spaces not raised above
the general surface of the centrodorsal. In Zenometra triserialis the distal portion
of the centrodorsal is thickly covered with spines, while the three equal columns
of circular cirrus sockets in each radial area are closely crowded. In Psathyro-
metra the dorsal pole of the centrodorsal is smooth, and the cirrus sockets are
arranged in three or four columns in each radial area; they are usually more or
less separated, and each cirrus socket is correspondingly separated from its neigh-
bors in the same column. If there are three columns in each radial area, the
median column tends to be deficient, the outer columns converging and meeting
beyond it. In one species this middle column is reduced to a single socket. If the
columns of cirrus sockets are crowded, the sockets become dorsoventrally elongate.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 257
Indeed, they are never so completely circular as are those of Zenometra. As an
additional character it may be mentioned that the centrodorsal of Psathyrometra is
always proportionately shorter and more regularly conical than that of Zenometra.
Fia. 263.
a
ZN,
Fia. 265. Fia. 266.
Figs. 262-266.—262, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF CYLLOMETRA DISCIFORMIS FROM THE Ki IsLanps
(AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 263, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF NEOMETRA MULTICOLOR FROM
SOUTHERN JAPAN. 264, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF TROPIOMETRA CARINATA (AFTER Pots
CARPENTER). 265, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF TROPIOMETRA INDICA FROM CEYLON. 266,
VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SIX-RAYED SPECIMEN OF TROPIOMETRA PICTA FROM RIO DE JANEIRO
In the genera in which the cirrus sockets are arranged in alternating rows,
with no division into radial areas, generic and sometimes also specific characters
may be found (1) in the general shape, which varies from low hemispherical to
958 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
~
long rounded conical; (2) in the number of the cirrus sockets, which varies from
15 to 100 or more; (3) in the proportionate size of the cirrus sockets; and (4) in
their mutual arrangement and regularity, whether or not they are more or less
scattered and somewhat irregular or very closely crowded and regular. The
proportionate size of the cirrus sockets is most conveniently judged from the
number which lie in a single row under each radial.
The relationship of the chief types of centrodorsal to the larger systematic
groups is briefly shown in the following table:
A. The primitive type of centrodorsal.
B. Thick discoidal or columnar centrodorsals, tending to become more or
less conical; the cirrus sockets are in columns, three or more to each radial area,
but the radial areas are not marked off from each other.
C. Columnar or conical centrodorsals, with the surface distinctly marked off
into radial areas; the cirrus sockets are in three columns in each radial area.
D. Columnar or conical centrodorsals, much reduced in size; the surface is
sharply differentiated into radial areas, the cirrus sockets are in two columns in
each radial area.
Comasteride, Zygometride, Himerometride, Stephanometride, Mariametride,
Colobometridx, Tropiometride, Calometride, Pentametrocrinide _ _- -- ------ A
Thalassometride (greatest emphasis at D)------------------------ B-D
Charitometride (greatest emphasis at B-C) ------------------------ A-C
Antedonide (greatest emphasis at A)--.-...-------_-------------- A-D
Atelecrinide.)25--2<-<s 22 2252 oe eee Se eee eee C-D
Cirri.
The cirri—which among the comatulids are organs of the very greatest impor-
tance in serving to attach the animals to the sea bottom or to various organisms on
the sea bottom, and thus to hold them fast, enabling them to withstand the influ-
ence of the motion of the water and of the movement of active animals in the
immediate vicinity, such as fish, which would tend to wrench them from their
position, and at the same time to keep them in a definite more or less upright
attitude, so as to insure a regular supply of food—in this group assume the most
extraordinary diversity of form and size, more or less in correlation with wide
differences in habit, and furnish data of the very greatest importance from the
systematic standpoint.
Comatulids living among abundant arborescent growths which are flexible or
semirigid, such as hydroids and gorgonians, tend to develop short stout cirri with
comparatively short more or less subequal segments which are capable of a great
amount of dorsoventral flexion (figs. 306, 307, p. 265); such cirzi are seen, in a more
or less perfected form, in part or all of the species of the genera Comissia, Comatulella,
Comactinia, Comaster, Comanthus, Zygometra, Eudiocrinus, Catoptometra, Amphi-
metra, Dichrometra, Liparometra, Lamprometra, Cenometra, Cyllometra, Decametra,
Prometra, Oligometra, Tropiometra, Neometra, Pectinometra, various genera of Charito-
metride and of Antedonine, Pentametrocrinus and Atelecrinus.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 259
Fig. 268.
Fia. 270.
Fic. Fic. 273.
Fics. 267-273.—267, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PTILOMETRA MULLERI FROM SYDNEY, NEw SouTHn
WALES. 268, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF ASTEROMETRA MACROPODA FROM SOUTHWESTERN
JAPAN. 269, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF STENOMETRA QUINQUECOSTATA FROM THE Ki ISLANDS
(AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 270, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PARAMETRA ORION FROM SOUTHERN
JAPAN. 271, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PTILOMETRA MOULLERI FROM AUSTRALIA (AFTER P. H.
CARPENTER). 272, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF THALASSOMETRA VILLOSA FROM THE WESTERN
ALEUTIAN ISLANDS. 273, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF STYLOMETRA SPINIFERA FROM CUBA.
260 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
On,
FG. 275.
Fia. 277.
Fig. 276.
Fic. 279.
Figs, 274-279.—274, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PACHYLOMETRA INQUALIS FROM THE KERMADEC
ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). , VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PACHYLOMETRA ANGUSTI-
CALYX FROM THE MEANGIS ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 276, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN
OF CRINOMETRA CONCINNA FROM CUBA. 277, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PCECILOMETRA ACCELA
FROM THE MEANGIS ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). , VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF
CHARITOMETRA INCISA FROM THE KERMADEC ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 279, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL
OF A SPECIMEN OF CHARITOMETRA BASICURVA FROM THE KERMADEC ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 261
Fie. 280. Fig. 281.
Fig. 282.
Fic. 284. Fig. 285.
Figs. 280-285.—280, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF ANTEDON PETASUS FROM NORWAY. 281, VENTRAL
VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF ANTEDON MEDITERRANEA FROM NAPLES. 282, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRO-
DORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF COMPSOMETRA LOVENI FROM Port JAcKSON, NEw SOUTH WALES. 283, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE
CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF ANTEDON BIFIDA (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 284, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL
OF A SPECIMEN OF COCCOMETRA HAGENI FROM FLORIDA. 285, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF
THYSANOMETRA TENELLOIDES FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN.
262 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
Fic. 286.
Fig. 288. Fig. 289.
Fig. 290,
Fia. 291.
Fis. 286-291,—286, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PSATHYROMETRA FRAGILIS FROM NORTHERN JAPAN.
287, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSA L OF A SPECIMEN OF LEPTOMETRA CELTICA (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 288, VEN-
TRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF ERYTHROMETRA RUBER FROM SOUTHWESTERN JAPAN. 289, VENTRAL
VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PEROMETRA DIOMEDE FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN. 290, VENTRAL VIEW OF
THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF HATHROMETRA DENTATA FROM SOUTHERN MASSACHUSETTS. 291, VENTRAL VIEW OF
THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF TRICHOMETRA ASPERA FROM GEORGIA.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 263
Fig. 292.
Fie. 294, Fig. 295.
Fig. 296. Fia. 297.
Figs. 292-297.—292, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF HELIOMETRA GLACIALIS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
293, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF HELIOMETRA GLACIALIS (AFTER P.H.CARPENTER). 294, VEN-
TRAL VIEW OF THE CONTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PROMACHOCRINUS KERGUELENSIS FROM KERGUELEN ISLAND (AFTER
P.H.CARPENTER). 295, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CONTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF SOLANOMETRA ANTARCTICA FROM HEARD
ISLAND (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 296, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF FLOROMETRA PERPLEXA
FROM BRITISH COLUMBIA. 297, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF FLOROMETRA ASPERRIMA FROM
ALASKA.
264 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Ls
A rocky bottom, or a bottom covered with highly caleareous organisms such
as calcareous alge, corals or lithothamnion, tends to induce the development of
very long and very stout cirri which, though flexible distally, are comparatively
Fie. 299.
Fig. 298,
Fia. 304.
Fias. 298-305.—298, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF THAUMATOMETRA TENUIS FROM THE SEA OF JAPAN.
2099, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF PENTAMETROCRINUS JAPONICUS FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN.
200, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF ATELECRINUS BALANOIDES (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 301,
LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF NEMASTER LINEATA FROM BRAZIL, WITH THE ROSETTE AND TWO
302, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL OF A SPECIMEN OF THAUMA-
RADIALS IN POSITION (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
303, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL, AND THE RADIAL PENTA-
TOCRINUS RENOVATUS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
GON WITH TWO RADIALS REMOVED, OF A SPECIMEN OF TROPIOMETRA PICTA (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 304, VENTRAL VIEW
OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF TROPIOMETRA PICTA; ONE OF THE BASAL RAYS (THE ANTERIOR IN THE FIGURE)
HAS BEEN REMOVED (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 305, THREE UNITED RADIALS FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA ROTALARIA,
VIEWED FROM THE INTERIOR OF THE CALYX (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
rigid proximally (fig. 309, p. 267); such cirri, most perfected in the species of Thalas-
sometridee, are more or less characteristic of some or all of the species of Nemaster,
Capillaster, Comanthus, Himerometra, Heterometra, Oxymetra, Pontiometra, Dichro-
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 265
metra, Mariametra, Colobometra, Calometra, and the genera of the Perometrins and
of the Zenometrine.
A muddy bottom induces a great lengthening and straightening of the cirri
as a whole, correlated with a lengthening of all the component segments, so that
the cirri collectively come to form a circular base supporting the animal after the
Fie. 307.
Fics. 306-307.—306, DIAGRAM SHOWING THE RELATIVE SIZE AND FREQUENCY OF THE ARMS AND CIRRI IN COMACTINIA ECHINOP-
TERA; THE CIRRI ARE SHORT. AND STRONG AND ARE ADAPTED FOR GRASPING ARBORESCENT MARINE ORGANISMS. 307,
DIAGRAM SHOWING THE RELATIVE SIZE AND FREQUENCY OF THE ARMS AND CIRRIIN PENTAMETROCRINUS TUBERCULATUS;
THE CIRRI ARE SHORT AND NUMEROUS AND ARE ADAPTED FOR GRASPING MARINE ORGANISMS.
fashion of a snowshoe (fig. 308, p. 267); this is carried to an extreme in some or
all of the species of Thawmatocrinus, Pentametrocrinus, Atelecrinus, Compsometra,
Iridometra, Leptometra, Psathyrometra, Thysanometra, Coccometra, Craspedometra,
and Eudiocrinus; while the tendency is strongly evident in Capillaster gracilicirra,
C. tenuicirra, Comatula tenuicirra, Comaster siboge, Amphimetra propinqua, Oxy-
metra tenuicirra and Dichrometra tenuicirra, all of which are very close to other
79146°—Bull. 82—15—18
266 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
species with much shorter cirri which are stouter and composed of much shorter
segments, Capillaster sentosa, C. multiradiata, Comatula purpurea, Comaster fruti-
cosus, Amphimetra producta, Oxymetra finschii and Dichrometra flagellata.
iravelly bottoms tend to induce a type of cirrus which is more or less inter-
mediate between the rocky and muddy bottom types, and is illustrated by the
cirri of the species of Promachocrinus, Heliometra, Anthometra, Florometra and
Solanometra.
As a general rule species living on muddy bottoms have extremely fragile
cirri which drop off at the slightest touch; the cirri of the species living on gravel
bottoms are almost as delicate; but the cirri of the species which live attached
to inorganic masses or to the inorganic rigid skeletons of marine growths, and
especially the cirri of the species which live attached to flexible marine growths,
are very tenacious.
On the basis of a broad average it may be stated that the littoral species have
the most tenacious cirri, while the cirri of the deep-water forms are the most fragile.
Though the cirri are ordinarily employed solely as organs of prehension, they
are capable of use as swimming organs, for the young of Jridometra nana has been
observed to float through the water with motionless extended arms, propelled by
the very rapid movements of the cirri.
The Innatantes, being pelagic and not having developed stems, never possess
cirri at any stage. In the Oligophreata and in the Macrophreata, however, cirri
are invariably present, in the latter always throughout life, and in the former
usually throughout life but invariably in the young, the family Comasteride
only containing species lacking cirri when adult, though the majority of its species
are provided with them. In the genus Capillaster alone of the nine genera of the
Capillasterine a species is found which loses its cirri when adult, these organs being
very highly developed in the other six species included in that genus; in the Com-
actiniines Comatulella, Comatulides and Comactinia always have strongly developed
cirri, but four of the nine species of Comatula have no cirri when fully grown, while
they are normally greatly reduced in number in one, and occasionally quite absent
in very large specimens of another, of the remaining four. In young examples of
these four forms which more or less normally lack the cirri, however, they are
comparatively large and stout. In both the genera of the Comasterine the cirri
are frequently absent, either as a specific character or through individual variation,
and in some of the species they appear to be lost at a very early age. All grada-
tions are observable between such forms as Comaster typica and Comantheria polyc-
nemis in which the centrodorsal is typically exceedingly reduced and sharply
stellate, countersunk to or even below the level of the radials, with never the
slightest trace of cirri, and such forms as Comaster multibrachiata and Comanthus
bennetti in which the cirri are extraordinarily large, stout, numerous, and well
developed; some species, like Comanthus annulata, usually possessing cirri but
occasionally being found without them; others, like Comanthina schlegelit or Comaster
belli, usually lacking cirri but sometimes occurring with from one or two to as many
as twenty, which are large and show no trace whatever of degeneration, still
remaining.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS, 267
Fic. 308.
Fie. 309.
: AND FREQUENCY OF THE ARMS AND CIRRI IN PENTAMETROCRINUS
Figs. 308-309.—308, DIAGRAM SHOWING THE RELATIVE SI?
VARIANS; THE CIRRI ARE NUMEROUS, VERY LONG, AND BUT SLIGHTLY CURVED, AND SERVE TO FORM A CIRCULAR MAT BY
WHICH THE ANIMAL IS SUPPORTED ON SOFT OOZE. 309, DIAGRAM SHOWING THE RELATIV SIZE AND FREQUENCY OF THE ARMS
AND CIRRI IN ASTEROMETRA MACROPODA; THE CIRRI ARE FEW, VERY LONG, STOUT, AND SPINOUS DORSALLY, ADAPTED FOR
CLINGING TO A VERY ROUGH EARD SURFACE.
268 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
It is interesting to note that the species lacking cirri when adult are confined
to the East Indian region (extending westward to Ceylon) and to northern Australia,
while within this circumscribed area this feature is much more developed along the
Australian coasts then elsewhere. This is a fact of very great importance, as will
be explained under General Conclusions.
The proportionate length of the cirri varies enormously; in some species of
Oligometra, in Antedon (figs. 103, p. 165, 104, p. 167, 105, p. 169, and 106, p. 171), and
in Mastigometra, as well as in Comactinia (fig. 76, p. 129), they attain to only a very
small percentage of the arm length; they are here, however, stout and well adapted
for firmly fixing the comparatively slender and attenuated animals; in such genera
as Ptilometra (fig. 93, p. 153), Pterometra, and Asterometra (fig. 94, p. 155) and their
near relatives they attain a most extraordinary size, in Asterometra macropoda (fig.
94, p. 155) and in A. magnipeda being longer than the arms, sometimes as much as
one-fifth longer, and very stout. Generally speaking, the cirri are, on the average,
one-fourth or one-fifth of the arm length, as in the closely related stalked species
of the family Pentacrinitide.
The number of component ossicles in the cirri varies as much as the length;
while there may be in certain species not more than 6 or 8 (fig. 76, p. 129), and very
often not more than 15, in Asterometra macropoda and in A. magnipeda there may
be as many as 120 or even more (fig. 94, p. 155).
Fundamentally the cirri are simply somatic outgrowths from the body wall
normally (as is indicated by their occurrence singly on nodal columnals) one to each
somatic division of the body. They are strictly comparable to the lateral somatic
outgrowths along the sides of the body in the arthropods, though they have become
so altered as to have lost almost all resemblance to the ancestral type.
In the arthropods these lateral body processes occur normally in a lateral or
ventrolateral line, and are commonly double, arranged in two series, one above the
other; they occur in the mid-line of each segment.
In the crinoids the cirri are dorsal, arranged in a circle of small diameter about
the extreme dorsal apex of the animal, and are normally single, though they may
be doubled or still further reduplicated. In the so-called monocyclic forms, con-
fined to the earlier horizons, they are interradial or midsomatic; in the comatulids
and in the pentacrinites they are always intersomatic, occurring in the radial areas
of the dorsal apex of the body.
The anomalous position of the crinoid cirri, which are confined to the dorsal
apex of the animal, is easily accounted for. The cirri represent the dorsal row of
lateral processes in the articulates, while the coronal plates, as previously explained,
represent the ventral; the crinoid arms originated from a third row of similar body
processes which was essentially a duplication of the second, while the orals represent
a fourth, which again was a duplication of the third.
If the crinoid cirri are true somatic processes they would naturally be expected
always to be interradial or midsomatic in position. But such is the case only in
the fossil so-called monocyclic forms. In all the recent types in which cirri occur
they are radial or intersomatic in position.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 269
This, however, is susceptible of ready explanation. In the comatulids and
pentacrinites the infrabasals have entirely lost their primitive character as impor-
tant calyx plates forming an important part of the body wall, and have become
entirely negligible constituents of the calcareous structure of the organism. In the
comatulids, when they are present at all, after their first appearance they soon fuse
with the proximale to form the centrodorsal, and in the pentacrinites they form merely
an insignificant circlet of minute plates within the inner ends of the basals. In the
ancestors of these groups they were large and important constituents of the calyx,
se important, in fact, that as a result of their apical situation they controlled the
Fi, 310.
Fie. 311.
Fias. 310-311.—310, THE ARM BASES, CENTRODORSAL AND CIRRI OF A SPECIMEN OF NANOMETRA BOWERSI FROM SOUTHWESTERN
JAPAN, ILLUSTRATING THE VARIOUS TYPES OF CIRRI. 311, CIRRI FROM A SPECIMEN OF FLOROMETRA MARLE FROM SOUTHERN
JAPAN; (a) A PERIPHERAL AND (5) A SUBAPICAL CIRRUS.
orientation of the columnals which, originating as rings just beneath the infra-
basals, were not able to maintain their primitive circular shape through uniform
accretion all around the edges, but were forced to delay their radial growth beneath
the convex dorsal surface of the infrabasals, while extending themselves with great
rapidity interradially in the slight depressions over the sutures between them. At
‘the same time the encroachment of the infrabasals upon the dorsal opening in the
calyx caused the lumen of the growing column to become more or less pentagonal
in outline, its angles coinciding with the outer angles of the columnals, so that there
was formed a strongly pentagonal column with a more or less pentagonal central
270 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
lumen, the angles both of the calcareous portion of the column and of the lumen
being directed interradially.
Such a column presents five radii of maximum density (directed interradially)
and five radii of minimum density (directed radially). Each columnal attains a
very strongly stellate shape with a very great difference between these two series of
radii before the cirri begin to develop. It is thus only natural that the cirri should
pierce the column by the path of least resistance and should reach the exterior by
the shortest route, emerging radially instead of interradially.
Apparently this distortion of the column became permanently fixed in the crinoid
phylogeny before the inception of the degeneration of the infrabasals which we see
carried to an extreme in the pentacrinites, and especially in the comatulids, so that
in these groups it remained in its secondary condition without reverting to the
original form.
We have already seen (p. 142) that the symmetry of the dorsal skeletal system
and of the dorsal nerves does not correspond with that of the ventral radial struc-
tures, for the mid-somatic dorsal structures are interradial and the mid-somatic
ventral structures are radial, the two sets having swung apart so that their respec-
tive mid-somatic axes differ in direction by 36°; in other words, a torsion has
been introduced into the ontogeny so that in the adults mid-somatic ventral struc-
tures lie directly above the intersomatic dorsal divisions. Remembering this it
does not occasion any surprise to find in the so-called dicyclic species (for example
in the pentacrinites and in the comatulids) a second torsion so that the cirri and
the originally mid-somatic structures of the column, instead of maintaining the
same orientation as regards the calyx as they do in the monocyclic forms, have
become shifted through an are of 36° and have thus come to lie directly beneath
the midsomatic axes of the ventral portion of the animal. Many of the hydroids,
aleyonarians and bryozoans which have adopted a plant-like habit of growth have
correlatively also adopted to a greater or lesser extent a spiral arrangement of
their zodids upon the central rachis which is strictly comparable to the spiral
arrangement of leaves upon the stem of a plant, for the economic factors governing
the arrangement of leaves are quite parallel to those determining the arrangement
of the zodids. The spiral swing through an are of 72° assumed by the dicyclic
crinoids, in two steps of 36° each, is the logical result of the possibility of plant-
like accommodation by these plant-like organisms to meet any exigency, internal
or external, which may arise in the course of their phylogenetic development.
Cirri only occur in the crinoids in which group, like the central or suranal plate
among the echinoids, they are by no means of universal occurrence, but are found
only in the more specialized, and mostly in the later, types; even in groups in
which they are normally present they may be abruptly suppressed, as in the
Innatantes and in the adults of many comasterids.
Their occurrence or non-occurrence usually is of great systematic interest, but
too much weight altogether has been placed upon it; we have seen how in a number.
of the Comasteride they may be only developed in the young and entirely suppressed
later; in other genera they do not appear at all until very late in life, as in Proisocrinus
(fig. 128, p. 199).
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. Die
It is a matter of great interest that where cirri occur they are definitely seg-
mented, and also appear in definitely localized positions, just like the limbs of the
arthropods taken as a whole, to which, as structures, they are allied. They also
resemble the limbs of arthropods in being specialized anteriorly, though the proximal
Fie. 312.
Fig. 313.
Figs. 312-313.—312, CIRRI FROM A SPECIMEN OF ANTEDON BIFIDA FROM ENGLAND (CAMERA LUCIDA DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR).
313, CIRRI FROM A SPECIMEN OF ANTEDON MEDITERRANEA FROM NAPLES (CAMERA LUCIDA DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR)
cirri do not differ much from the distal and earlier; it is possible, however, to regard
the elongate marginal cirri which never assume the adult characters, such as are seen
in the species of Heliometra, Promachocrinus, Anthometra, Florometra or Solanometra
for instance, as tactile organs, distantly suggesting the antenne of the arthropods.
272 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
The individual ossicles of the cirri are formed as a result of the segmentation and
solidification, and simultaneous division, of a primitive uniform spicular calcareous
investment of the cirri.
The ossicles of the cirri are therefore precisely similar to the pinnulars beyond
the second in their origin, and quite different from the primary plates of the calyx
as well as from the brachials.
Thus it is that the length of the cirrus segments is strictly inversely proportionate
to the amount of motion to be accommodated between them, a correlation which
is not observable in the series of brachials where, on the contrary, the most motion
is permitted between the longest (distalmost) ossicles.
Morphologically the first two segments of the pinnules are merely atrophied
brachials, while the remaining portion of the pinnules, including the third and
succeeding segments, is merely a tentacular process exactly comparable to the
cirri, but carrying ambulacral structures on its ventral side.
Each brachial originates as, and is fundamentally, an axillary; one of the
two derivatives from this axillary, after the formation of two ossicles, which are
united to each other just as are the paired ossicles of the division series, abruptly
ceases its development, while the other continues to increase in size, its basal
segments attaining the same diameter as the brachial upon which its rests. The
atrophied branch from the original axillary stage of the growing brachial serves as
the base from which there extends outward a long tentacular structure with no
phylogenetic history, which forms within itself a series of skeletal braces as necessity
requires, and which is in every way exactly comparable to a cirrus, which also is a
long tentacular structure with no phylogenetic history forming within itself a
series of skeletal braces as necessity requires, excepting only that it bears ambulacral
structures along its ventral surface.
Since pinnules beyond the second segment are merely elongated tentacular
processes in which a skeleton is formed as needed, and cirri are also elongate ten-
tacular processes in which a skeleton is formed as needed, it necessarily follows
that the skeleton of the two sets of organs will be essentially identical, differing
only in such modification as will enable the pinnule to carry ambulacral organs on
its ventral side; and further, that if for any reason the pinnules are not supplied
with ambulacral organs on their ventral side the difference between the cirri and
the pinnules beyond the second segment will almost or entirely disappear.
The fundamental identity in structure between the cirri and the pinnules
beyond the second segment is best illustrated by well-developed specimens of
Comatulella brachiolata. In this species all the arms bear ungrooved pinnules in
equal numbers. In the proximal portion of the arms the pinnules on either side
typically alternate, grooved and ungrooved; further out there are two grooved
pinnules between adjacent ungrooved pinnules, and toward the arm tips all of
the pinnules are grooved. There is a very great difference in the structure of the
grooved and ungrooved pinnules, which is well shown in the earlier portion of the
arm where the two types alternate regularly. The grooved pinnules, after the
first two segments, which are rather large, are slender, delicate, and very flexible; the
ungrooved pinnules have slightly larger basal segments than the grooved and taper
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 213
very gradually so that they are much stouter than the delicate grooved pinnules;
at first they lie horizontally, but in their distal third or half they curve dorsally
into the form of a hook or spiral, exactly as do the cirri, forming tendril-like attach-
ments all along the arm whereby the animal fixes each arm securely to the organisms
cn the sea-floor in addition to fixing its central portion by means of its cirri.
The segments of the stout grooveless pinnules are produced dorsally into blunt
rounded processes exactly resembling the dorsal convex swellings on the outer
cirrus segments; these are perfectly smooth with no trace of spines. These pro-
e
Fig. 314. o |
Fie, 315.
Fie, 316.
(r- A
Fie, 317. Fig, 318.
Figs. 314-318.—314, THE EXTREME TIP OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF STEPHANOMETRA MONACANTHA FROM THE MARSHALL
ISLANDS (CAMERA LUCIDA DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR). 315, THE EXTREME TIP OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF HATHRO-
METRA SARSI FROM NORWAY (CAMERA LUCIDA DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR). 316, THE DISTAL PORTION OF A CIRRUS FROM
‘A SPECIMEN OF LEPTOMETRA PHALANGIUM FROM NAPLES (CAMERA LUCIDA DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR). 317, THE EXTREME
TIP OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF OLIGOMETRA THETIDIS FROM NEW SOUTH WALES (CAMERA LUCIDA DRAWING BY THE
AUTHOR), 318, THE EXTREME TIP OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF HIMEROMETRA PERSICA FROM THE PERSIAN GULF
(CAMERA LUCIDA DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR).
cesses are entirely absent from the dorsal side of the slender grooved pinnules which
instead, bear on the terminal segments the long recurved spines characteristic of
all the species of this family.
The course of the axial canal in the cirri is just the reverse of the course of the
axial canal in the pinnules; that is, while the axial canal in the pinnules progres-
sively moves dorsalward so that it comes to lie nearer and nearer the dorsal surface,
the axial canal in the cirri progressively moves ventralward so that it comes to lie
nearer and nearer the ventral surface.
274 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
With the increasing differentiation in size of the ventral and dorsal ligament
masses in the cirri comes also a progressive differentiation of the fossee which con-
tain them, and these come to resemble those on the earlier pinnule segments.
It is probable that the pinnules and the cirri represent the original type of
crinoidal appendage, and that these appendages were arranged in five pairs, the
two components of each pair being, so to speak, back to back; but both the pin-
nules and the cirri have become enormously reduplicated, while in addition the
former have come to lie along either side of long body processes of subsequent
development.
When the origin of the cirri and of the cirrals is understood it becomes at once
evident why no branching ever occurs in the cirri, such as frequently occurs in the
distal portion of the arms and at the bases of the pinnules. The cirri are true
uniserial outgrowths, both phylogenetically and ontogenetically, like the legs of
arthropods; and, like the legs of arthropods, they may bifurcate at the base, though
this never happens except within the central cavity or within the substance of the
centrodorsal.
At first the lines of division between the cirrus segments are, when the cirri
are viewed laterally, perfectly straight and at right angles to the longitudinal axis
of the cirri (figs. 553, 558, pl. 5); at this time also the cirri are straight and almost
or quite uniformly jointed processes. Correlatively with the gradual change of the
cirrus segments toward the adult type the portion of the line of division ventral to
the transverse articular ridge gradually leans distally, while the portion dorsal to the
transverse articular ridge, to a lesser degree, leans proximally.
The amount of departure from a straight line exhibited by the lines of division
between the cirrus segments is in general proportionate to the motion to be accom-
modated. Thus in cirri with long proximal and short distal segments the lines of
division separating the former are almost straight and perpendicular to the longi-
tudinal axis of the cirri, while those separating the latter are obtuse angles (figs.
322, p. 277, 327-329, p. 281, and 339, p. 285). In the case of enormously enlarged
cirri, such as those of the species of Asterometra (figs. 94, p. 155, and 362, p. 295),
however, the short outer segments, being physiologically too remote from the source
of nutrition, always remain in a comparatively undeveloped state, and the lines of
division between them are straight or nearly so.
The obliquity of the course of the lines of division between the cirrals is the
result purely of mechanical considerations. If the central canal runs through
the middle of the segments, so that the ligaments on either side of it are in a state
of equilibrium (fig. 5876, pl. 13), the lines of division are straight and at right
angles to the longitudinal axis of the cirri; but if the central canal is ventral to
the center of the cirrus segments, so that the dorsal ligament bundles are larger
than the ventral (fig. 587a, pl. 13), a constant contraction operates, not only
within the ligament bundles themselves but also within their continuation in
the interior of the segments, which is proportionate to the difference in size
between the two ligament bundles; and this results in giving to the cirrus a curve
dorsalward proportionate to the difference in size and strength between the ventral
and dorsal ligament bundles, and in pulling distally the whole mass of the segments
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 215
ventral to the central canal (thus giving the portion of the distal border of the cirrals
which is ventral to the transverse ridge a slanting direction toward the tip of the
cirrus), while the mass of the segments dorsal to the central canal is pulled proxi-
mally for a distance which is as much less than that to which the ventral part
Fia, 319.
Fig. 320.
Figs. 319-320.—319, LATERAL VIEW OF REGENERATING CIRRI FROM A SPECIMEN OF TROPIOMETRA MACRODISCUS FROM
SOUTHERN JAPAN. 320, ABNORMAL AND NORMAL CIRRI OF A SPECIMEN OF COMASTER DISTINCTA FROM THE LESSER
SunpA IsLanps. A, A CIRRUS FLATTENED DORSOVENTRALLY, WITH THE DORSAL PROCESSES DOUBLED AND PLACED
LATERALLY, IN (@) DORSAL AND IN (b) LATERAL VIEW. B, A NORMAL CIRRUS, LATERALLY FLATTENED, VIEWED (a)
LATERALLY AND (b) DORSALLY.
of the segments is extended as the difference in volume between the two
ligament masses, the extension of the small ventral ligament mass being com-
pensated by a comparatively small contraction of the large dorsal ligament mass
(figs. 322, p. 277, and 587a, pl. 13).
276 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
The general structure of the cirri is the same throughout the group, and may
be thus described: The first two segments are very short, very much broader than
long, and approximately of equal size, though a close examination always discloses
a slight increase in the proportionate length of the second (figs. 312, 313, p. 271).
Ordinarily there are only two of these short basal segments; but if the cirri are very
long, as in most of the species of Thalassometride, there may be one or two addi-
tional which are somewhat longer than the first two, the outer again being slightly
longer than the more proximal (figs. 361, 362, p. 295, and 392, p. 307); the third (or
fourth or fifth) segment is considerably longer than those preceding, and the following
two or three still further increase in length, becoming, on an average, approximately
twice as long as broad when viewed laterally; after four or five more the segments
gradually decrease in length, at the same time becoming compressed laterally, and
more and more sharply rounded dorsally, while the distal dorsal edge becomes
produced; in the distal part of the cirrus we find the segments ordinarily broader
than long, strongly carinate dorsally, with the projection of the distal dorsal edge
narrowed to a point, and forming a median or subterminal dorsal spine.
Typically the distal profile of the cirrus segments when viewed laterally shows
a broad S-shaped curve which lies diagonally, running from the ventral distal edge
downward and backward to the dorsal distal edge (figs. 312, 313, p. 271); the portion of
this curve ventral to the transverse ridge is strongly convex and lies at a compara-
tively small angle to the longitudinal axis of the segments; the portion dorsal to the
transverse ridge is, less strongly, concave, and makes a much greater angle with
the longitudinal axis of the segments. Lateral compression of the segments is
accompanied by a straightening of this curve, and by a marked tendency for the
straightened ends of the segments to approximate a position at right angles to their
longitudinal axes (fig. 397, p. 309).
The distal end of the cirrus terminates in a sharply pointed more or less curved
hooklike process, the terminal claw (figs. 4, p. 63, and 314-318, ’p. 273); in mature
cirri this is almost always slightly longer than (occasionally almost twice as long as)
the penultimate segment which next precedes it, and it is usually evenly curved
(figs. 312, 313, p. 271), the radius of curvature being the same as, or slightly less
than, that of the distal portion of the cirrus as a whole in life; it tapers from a
rather stout base to a slender and needle-like tip, sometimes Byenly, but more com-
monly with greater rapidity in the proximal third or half, so that the distal two-
thirds or half is comparatively slender; in certain oligophreate forms it is more or
less abruptly decurved at the junction between the comparatively stout basal
third and the proportionately slender distal two-thirds, the latter being often
approximately straight (figs. 317, 318, p. 273).
The terminal claw is usually well developed, and an important structural and
physiological feature of the cirrus; but in species with long, slender, and smooth
cirri, living upon sandy, oozy or muddy bottoms devoid of arborescent organic
life so that the cirri collectively function merely as a sort of circular snowshoe,
by their large numbers forming a broad circular base upon which the animal may
rest without danger of sinking into the ooze and becoming mired, the terminal claw
often becomes straightened, dwarfed, blunted, and rudimentary, sometimes being
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. ; 277
reduced merely to a small conical terminal button with little or no trace of the
hard vitreous cortical layer typically present (figs. 372, 376, p. 299, and 404, 406,
p- 311); similarly, in species with very long and spiny cirri, such as those belonging
to the genera Asterometra, Ptilometra, Pterometra, Zenometra, Thalassometra, Cosmio-
metra, etc., which live attached to rocks or to calcified or chitinous organisms where
no penetration by the terminal claw is possible, that organ has become, together
with the penultimate segment, quite insignificant, no longer performing any special
Fig. 321.
Fig, 322.
Fias. 321-323.—321, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMATELLA NIGRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS VIEWED (a) DORSALLY
AND (b) LATERALLY. 322, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF CAPILLASTER MARLE FROM SOUTHWESTERN JAPAN,
323, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF CAPILLASTER MULTIRADIATA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS VIEWED (a) DORSALLY AND
(6) LATERALLY.
function of its own, but serving merely to assist the dorsal spines in roughening
the dorsal surface of the cirri, the gripping action being effected entirely by the
embracing of the object of attachment without penetration (figs. 94, p.155, and 363,
364, 366-368, p. 297).
The terminal claw possesses a very dense cortical layer, vitreous in appearance,
which enyelops a core of lesser density, resembling the entire substance of the pre-
ceding segments. This cortical layer at the base is very thin, but it gradually
278 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
increases in thickness so that the inner core is brought to an apex a considerable
distance from the point of the terminal claw as a whole. The relationship between
the central core and the cortical layer is analogous to that between the dentine and
the enamel in pointed mammalian teeth.
In ontogenetically young developing cirri the terminal claw at first differs in no
way from the preceding segments in shape or size, except that it is rounded off at
the tip; during growth, however, it gradually becomes curved, slender, and pointed,
and commonly elongates with slightly greater rapidity than the other distal seg-
ments, in certain cases, as in the genus Crinometra, involving the penultimate
segment in this elongation. In older or in regenerating cirri its growth is relatively
far more rapid, and it becomes very long, slightly curved, and pointed, while the
following ossicles are as yet merely short cylinders, one-third or even one-fourth of
its length (see two enlargements in the lower center of fig. 382, p. 301); similarly its
growth ceases and it attains its perfect form long before the following segments
reach their full size.
Probably the origin of the differentiation and of the specialization of the
terminal claw may be explained as the result of pure mechanics. The action of
gripping the soft but more or less resistant bodies of other organisms into which the
cirrus tip tended to penetrate to a greater or lesser degree has resulted in the paring
away or molding of the sides of the originally bluntly conical terminal segment, at
the same time causing a condensation of the cortical layer of stereom, and finally
resulting in the formation of a sharpened terminal spine, curved in the same degree
as the distal part of the cirrus as a whole. This process would very quickly cause
the formation of a pronounced and perfected terminal claw, so that now we find that
character a very important feature in both the recent groups, the comatulids and
the pentacrinites, which live attached to the bottom or to other organisms by the
Gi».
The penultimate segment in rare cases resembles the preceding segments (figs.
316, p. 273, and 356, p. 293), but it is usually modified more or less, tending to assume
certain of the characters of the terminal claw (figs. 314, 315, 317, 318, p. 273).
It is commonly somewhat tapering and of a lesser diameter than the segments
preceding, so that it appears smaller but proportionately more elongate, most
frequently about as long as broad, in contrast to very short preceding cirrals,
though in certain cases where the distal cirrals are long the penultimate segment
may be somewhat shorter than those proximal to it, being intermediate in its pro-
portionate length between the terminal claw and the preceding cirrals (figs. 369,
370,p. 299). Its distal edge usually inclines inward (dorsalward) at a much larger
angle than the distal edges of the other cirrals (which are nearly parallel to their
proximal edges), and therefore in lateral view the penultimate segment is roughly
trapezoidal, the base of the trapezoid being ventral. The dorsal surface is broadly
rounded and is never carinate as is frequently the case on the preceding segments.
There is less variation in the size and in the shape of the terminal claw and
penultimate segment than in any of the other elements of which the cirri are com-
posed, even than in the short basal segments. The shape and proportionate size of
the terminal claw is fairly constant when compared with the very variable shapes
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 279
and sizes of the cirrals. A similar conservatism is displayed by the penultimate
segment, this being much less variable than the preceding segments, though not so
constant as the terminal claw. The penultimate segment is in effect an interme-
diate between the terminal claw and the cirrals preceding it.
In structure the penultimate segment resembles the preceding cirrals, being
devoid of the vitreous cortical layer covering the terminal claw. Except in rare
cases where the terminal claw is reduced to a straightened, blunted, and shortened
conical finial appendage, the penultimate segment almost always bears, at least in
SAO PE PTY Fa) Pu aA NT oe peal
Fig. 324.
Te aha abs pape Pe a) ba pd
Fie. 325.
ae eit ee a)
a
ae eee eed
Fie, 326,
Fics. 324-326.—324, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF NEMASTER INSOLITUS FROM BARBADOS VIEWED (a2) DORSALLY AND (b) LATER
ALLY, 325, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF LEPTONEMASTER VENUSTUS FROM THE WEST COAST OF FLORIDA VIEWED (a)
DORSALLY AND (b) LATERALLY. 326, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMATILIA IRIDOMETRIFORMIS FROM THE SOUTHEASTERN
UNITED STATES VIEWED (a2) DORSALLY AND (5) LATERALLY.
the majority of the cirri in a given individual, a more or less, sometimes quite, erect,
sharp dorsal spine, known from its relation to the terminal claw as the opposing
spine which, with the latter, forms a more or less chelate tip.to the cirrus (figs. 4,
p- 63, and 314, 315, 317, 318, p. 273); but the similarity to the crustacean or
arachnid chela is somewhat lessened by the fact that the terminal claw is almost
immovably articulated to the penultimate segment.
The opposing spine (fig. 4, p. 63) differs somewhat phylogenetically and
ontogenetically from the dorsal spines on the preceding segments, being closer to
280 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
the terminal claw in its general relationships than to the dorsal spines proper; it
is, however, intermediate between them. It is present and well developed in many
species (as in all those of the Comactiniine) in which no dorsal spines are ever
developed (figs. 394, 395, 397, 398, 400, 401, p. 309), and it exhibits the perfected
acutely conical shape and erect median position in many cases where the processes
on the preceding segments are as yet in the primitive stage of a broad serrate
transverse ridge. In structure it is more dense than the dorsal spines, and it
possesses a thick vitreous cortical layer of condensed stereom resembling that on the
terminal claw, though never quite so well developed. In young and in regenerating
cirri it is very early in making its appearance, being well developed before the cirrus
segments have lost their original short cylindrical form.
The opposing spine may make but a slight angle with the median axis of the
‘penultimate segment (fig. 314, p. 273), or it may be quite erect and at right angles
to that axis (fig. 317, p. 273). The proportion of declination is correlated with its
position; if it is termally situated it makes the minimum angle with the median axis;
it is not erect unless its position is at the center of the dorsal surface of the penulti-
mate segment (fig. 352, p. 291). The degree of declination is in direct inverse
ratio to its distance from the distal edge.
The opposing spine functions as a hilt for the sharp and dagger-like terminal
claw, preventing the cirrus from sinking too deeply into, and thereby becoming hope-
lessly entangled with, the substance of the organism to which the crinoid is clinging.
Typically the opposing spine reaches a height about equal to the distal trans-
verse diameter of the penultimate segment, though it is often less, especially in those
species in which the preceding segments bear no dorsal processes; in the oligo-
phreate species it is commonly triangular, arising from the entire dorsal surface of
the penultimate segment, thus being considerably broader basally, and also longer,
than the processes on the preceding segments (fig. 318, p. 273); in the macrophreate
forms, as well as in certain of the oligophreate, however, the base is usually shorter,
and the spine arises from the outer part only of the penultimate segment (figs. 395,
396, p. 309); this is always the case if dorsal processes are not developed on the
preceding segments.
The origin of the dorsal spines and of the opposing spine was probably some-
what as follows: The central canal through the cirrals is at first central in position;
after the middle of the cirrus it moves slowly and gradually ventralward (fig. 587,
pl. 13). This results in a difference in size between the dorsal and the ventral liga-
ment bundles by which the cirrals are articulated (the two sets at first being similar
and equal), the former becoming progressively larger and stronger and the latter
correlatively smaller and weaker. In consequence of the normal state of balanced
tension of the ligament fibers the cirri assume a curved shape, the curve being very
gradual at first, but increasing toward the tip, the radiusof curvature being everywhere
proportionate to the difference in strength between the dorsal and the ventral liga-
ment bundles. The calcareous elements of which the cirrals are composed are
deposited as rings or cylinders within the sarcode of the growing cirri; normally
they increase in length by the addition of calcareous matter equally all around
their margins; where the ligament bundles are equally balanced this occurs, but
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 281
FI@. 327.
<met b f paf
Fia. 328.
PDDEELE LD EP]
é
Fig, 331.
Figs. 327-331.—327, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA PECTINATA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS VIEWED (a) DORSALLY
AND (b) LATERALLY. 328, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMACTINIA ECHINOPTERA VIEWED (a) DORSALLY AND (b) LAT-
ERALLY. 329, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PINGUIS FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN. 330, LATERAL
VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS TRICHOPTERA FROM SOUTHEASTERN AUSTRALIA (AFTER P, H, Car-
PENTER). 331, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM CEYLON VIEWED (a) DORSALLY AND (b)
LATERALLY. .
79146°—Bull. 82—15——_19
282 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
beyond the middle of the cirri the superior tension of the larger dorsal ligament bun-
dle prevents the production of the distal dorsal edge of the cirrals at the same rate
as the distal ventral edge is produced. As the potential growth of the cirrals is the
same all around the edges (both distal and proximal) the excess growth of the
dorsal part of the distal ede over what is possible owing to the restrictions conse-
quent on the curvature is accommodated by an eversion of the distal edge and its
production into a prominent dentate frill, which later is usually specialized and
developed into a more or less sharp dorsal spine. In case the curvature of the
cirri is not very sharp, the excess of stereom deposited on the dorsal side of the
cirrals may be evenly distributed, taking the form of a swelling of the dorsal side,
as in Comanthus bennetti, or (secondarily) of a longitudinal carination (fig. 369, p. 299);
such swelling or carination often occurs in combination with more or less pronounced
spines.
The opposing spine approaches nearer the terminal claw than to the dorsal
spines in structure. As there is practically no motion possible between it and the
terminal claw, its origin could not have been quite the same as that of the dorsal
spines. It is probably the result of excess growth localized on the distal dorsal
border of the penultimate segment for purely mechanical reasons, its subsequent
molding into a sharp spine resembling in all essentials the terminal claw being due
to the same causes that operated in the case of that element.
The dorsal spines or dorsal processes proximal to the opposing spine form a
finely graduated series from the most primitive or rudimentary toward the base of
the cirri to the most highly perfected on the antepenultimate segment (figs. 365—
367, p. 297). In many cases the change is slow and uniform, and there is a pro-
gressive specialization segment by segment to the end. This is especially to be
noted in spiny cirri which are short or of moderate length; in long cirri the spines
commonly become perfected at some distance from the tip, and no further change
is visible from that point onward.
This gradual development of the dorsal processes is correlated with (indeed, as
previously shown, probably dependent upon) a similar gradual increase in the
amount of dorsoventral motion possible between adjoining segments. Very con-
siderable dorsoventral motion is allowed between the two to four or five basal seg-
ments; the next following are very closely united, and there is a very slow gain
in the scope of possible motion until the tip of the cirrus is reached; in very long
cirri the maximum is attained at some distance from the end and is continued to
the tip. There is practically no motion possible except in the planes including
the longitudinal (dorsoventral) axis of the body, as the fuleral ridges of the joint
faces all run straight across these from side to side; the basal segments collectively
allow of flexion through about 180°, so that the cirri may at this point be bent
directly downward or directly upward so as to extend vertically (parallel to the
longitudinal axis) between the arms; no motion is possible between the smooth
proximal segments, and the scope of the motion permitted by the more distal seg-
ments is much more limited than that allowed between the basal; the outer part of
the cirri (beyond the rigid middle portion) can not be raised further than to bring
all of the segments into a straight line, and often a broad spiral is the extreme in
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 283
this direction; but the combined possibilities of motion between the short outer
segments (when numerous) is such that the cirrus tips may be rolled up into a
close spiral, thus surrounding and clinging fast to any slender object, such as the
stem of a gorgonian or hydroid, which they may touch.
The transverse ridges across the joint faces of the cirrals in the basal portion
of the cirri traverse the center of those joint faces (fig. 587b, pl. 13); this
accounts for the equal brevity of the ventral and dorsal profile of the very short
THUS i
br ATES
Fia. 332.
—<EEEPEEEFEEEEEEE EEE EES |) J)
-
FIG. 333.
eet ed
Fig, 334.
(SY AE
Fia. 335.
Figs. 332-335.—332, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF ZYGOMETRA MICRODISCUS FROM NORTHERN AUSTRALIA
(AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 333, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF ZYGOMETRA COMATA FROM SINGAPORE VIEWED (a) DOR-
SALLY AND (b) LATERALLY. 334, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF CATOPTOMETRA HARTLAUBI FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN VIEWED
(a) DORSALLY AND (0) LATERALLY. 335, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF AMPHIMETRA PHILIBERTI FROM THE ANDAMAN ISLANDS
VIEWED (a) DORSALLY AND (5) LATERALLY.
basal segments, and the nondevelopment of spines on the latter; as the segments
increase in length distally and become more and more compressed and carinate
dorsally the ridges gradually move nearer and nearer the ventral surface, so that the
ventral ligament pit becomes progressively smaller and smaller and the dorsal lig-
ament pit correspondingly increases in size, this being correlated with a correspond-
ing increase in the length and possible scope of the ligament fibers, as well as with
an increasing disproportion in the comparative strength of the two bundles as
explained above, and a progressive increase in the size of the dorsal spines or
processes.
284 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
In a few cases, as for instance in Antedon, Mastigometra, and in the genera of
the Comactiniine, provision is made for this flexibility (which, however, is only
moderately developed in these forms) by the beveling off or cutting away through
resorption of the dorsal distal ends of the segments below (dorsal to) the transverse
fulcral ridge (figs. 312, 313, p. 271). Usually no such adaptation is found, or if
present it is so slight as to be inadequate to serve the purpose; instead, the motion
of one segment upon another and consequent intermittent compression of the dis-
tal edge of the latter, working in connection with the progressive difference in the
size of the dorsal and ventral ligament bundles, has resulted in the swelling or in
the eversion of this distal edge which rises obliquely upward as a broad thickened
rim or as a crescentic serrate transverse ridge.
In a few species with comparatively primitive stout cirri, such as those belong-
ing to the genera Catoptometra or Tropiometra (fig. 356, p. 293), or to the genera
included in the family Charitometride, no further development is found; the play
of the distal segments upon each other is made possible by a turning outward of
the dorsal distal edge of each; but in most cases such a condition is found only in
the more proximal of the segments bearing dorsal processes; as the amount of
possible intersegmental motion gradually increases distally, we find that the pro-
duced distal dorsal edge of the segments gradually becomes more prominent,
increasing in height and becoming more and more erect, at the same time, on
account of the progressive dorsal carination of the segments, becoming progressively
narrower and moving inward from the ends of the segments to a subterminal or
even median position, so that the dorsal processes have, on the subterminal seg-
ments, become sharp spines situated in the subterminal or median portion of the
dorsal side.
The dorsal spines commonly are of a slightly more dense composition than the
remainder of the segments which bear them; though in some species they may
for a greater or lesser distance inward from the end of the cirrus be tipped with
vitreous condensed stereom, the amount of this tipping rapidly decreases prox-
imally on succeeding spines. The progressive distal increase in height and erect-
ness, and the progressive attainment of a position further and further removed
from the extreme distal edge, are to be explained by the correlation in the develop-
ment of these structures and the progressive difference in size between the dorsal
and the ventral ligament bundles by which the cirrals are articulated; where this
difference is greatest, the dorsal processes were first formed, and as the dorsal
processes developed here are the oldest, they have become the most perfected. The
transformation of the original transverse ridge into a spine may be simply a normal
growth change, or its origin may be mechanical along the lines suggested for ex-
plaining the original sharpening of the terminal claw.
In species having the cirri unusually broad, as in the species composing the
genera of the Colobometride (figs. 345-348, p. 289, 349-352, p. 291, and 353-355,
p. 293), the primitive transverse ridge does not simply become more and more acute
and soon resolve itself into a spine as is commonly the case, but the cirri become
flattened below, and the originally crescentic transverse ridge resolves itself into a
sharp flattened serrate ridge (as in Oligometra and in Prometra), bi- or tricuspid
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 285
spines (as in Cyllometra or Decametra), or into paired dorsal spines (as in Cenometra
or Colobometra); at the tip of the cirrus, however, these various structures finally
give way to the usual single spine.
FiG. 337.
Fic. 338.
FIG, 339.
Fics. 336-339.—336, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF AMPHIMETRA DISCOIDEA FROM QUEENSLAND. 337, A
CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF AMPHIMETRA ENSIFER FROM SINGAPORE VIEWED (@) DORSALLY AND ()) LATERALLY. 338, LAT-
ERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF HIMEROMETRA MARTENSI FROM SINGAPORE. 339, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS
FROM A SPECIMEN OF HIMEROMETRA PERSICA FROM THE PERSIAN GULF.
In a number of species, chiefly in the families Mariametride (fig. 344, p. 287),
Stephanometride (fig. 340, p. 287) and Charitometride (fig. 369, p. 299), the
cirrals in the outer portion of the cirri gradually become strongly carinate dorsally
286 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
without forming pointed spines. This is the case only in those species in which
the cirri are short and the possible scope of intersegmental motion is very limited,
the action of the cirrus as a whole being largely localized in the basal segments;
there has therefore been no opportunity for the formation of everted distal dorsal
edges to the segments, though the sharpening of the median dorsal line has taken
place as usual.
In most species with very long cirri, as evidenced particularly by species of
Perometrineg (fig. 387, p. 307) and Thalassometride (figs. 363-368, p. 297), there
has been, in the distal portion of the cirri, a combination of these processes; dorsal
spines have been acquired through metamorphosis from a primitive transverse
ridge; but in the outer segments there has been, due to the shortening of these
segments and the progressively more and more ventral position occupied by the
transverse fulcral ridge, a considerable tendency toward an excess of the dorsal
deposit of stereom, so that the spines are more or less masked by the resultant high
carination, which as a rule reaches to their apices, and the dorsal processes assume
a form resembling that of the teeth of Serrasalmo.
Typically the cirri may be said to consist of from 15 to 20 segments with
longitudinally straight sides and meeting end to end without overlap, the first
two segments short, the third about as long as broad, the following three slightly
longer than broad, then gradually becoming slightly broader than long; as the
segments begin to decrease in length their distal dorsal edges thicken and gradually
come to project, especially in the median dorsal line; the cirri are at first broadly
oval, often nearly circular, in cross section, but soon become somewhat flattened,
though still regularly oval, and after the first appearance of the distal dorsal
processes more flattened, and in cross section somewhat pointed dorsally.
This typical or average type of cirrus, which careful study has indicated as the
primitive comatulid type of cirrus, differing but slightly from the generalized
pentacrinite type as found in Teliocrinus (fig. 127, p. 197) or in Hypalocrinus,
does not occur in any known form, though in certain of the genera both of the
Oligophreata and of the Macrophreata the cirri of some species approach very
closely to it. Among the oligophreate genera most of the species belonging to the
family Charitometride (fig. 369, p. 299), as well as those of the genus Catopiometra
(fig. 334, p. 283) and certain species of Comanthus (as for instance Comanthus
parvicirra) (fig. 331, p. 281), possess cirri close to the primitive type, while the
same is true of some of the species of Antedon (fig. 312, p. 271) and of Mastigometra
among the macrophreate forms; but in all of these genera there is more or less
deviation in various directions. It is somewhat remarkable that these six genera,
all of which are highly specialized, and so widely different that they must be placed
in two distinct suborders and four families, should have departed so slightly from
the primitive cirrus structure as deduced not only from a critical comparative
study of mature cirri, but from a study of the ontogeny of the cirri in all the groups.
Their cirri might be supposed to have converged from entirely different types
toward a common central type as a result of similar requirements; but if this were
so we should expect the cirri of the young, or immature, or regenerating cirri, to
>)
recapitulate these ancestral forms before reaching the mature form, but nothing
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 287
Fia. 340.
Fig, 341,
Fie. 342.
Fie. 343.
Fia. 344.
Figs. 340-344.—340, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF STEPHANOMETRA MONACANTHA FROM Fit. 341, A CIRRUS
FROM A SPECIMEN OF PONTIOMETRA ANDERSONI FROM SINGAPORE VIEWED (@) DORSALLY AND (>) LATERALLY. 342, LATERAL
VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF DICHROMETRA TENUICIRRA FROM THE JAVA SEA, SHOWING THE ELONGATE DISTAL
SEGMENTS. 343, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF MARIAMETRA SUBCARINATA FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN.
344, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF DICHROMETRA TENERA FROM THE MARSHALL ISLANDS.
288 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
which might be interpreted as such recapitulation ever occurs. ‘There is no evidence
in the developmental history of these genera to show that any of the ancestral
types from which they are derived possessed cirri much different from those which
they themselves possess; and, tracing the cirri backward through their ontogeny,
we find that, instead of becoming more different, they regularly converge toward
each other, which may be taken as almost certain proof that all of these forms, in
spite of the enormous amount of differentiation in other characters, still have
retained almost unchanged the primitive type of cirrus.
A phylogenetic arrangement of the comatulids on the basis of their cirris
structure is thus seen to be impossible, for the simplest type of cirrus found, with
little doubt the one nearest to the primitive cirrus, both of the comatulids and of
the pentacrinites, is characteristic of genera representing very specialized forms ©
which, judged by other characters, stand at or near the culmination of very diverse
lines of descent. The cirri, therefore, from a phylogenetic point of view, in show-
ing that no one group is especially developed beyond the others, though the lines
of development may be quite different, show essentially the same thing as all the
other available characters collectively.
There are three lines of deviation from the primitive type of cirrus structure:
(1) In the direction of greater slenderness (figs. 83, p. 136, 98, p. 159, 308, p. 267,
376, p. 299, and 381, 382, p. 301); (2) in the direction of greater stoutness (figs. 99,
p- 160, 100, p. 162, 307, p. 265, and 369, p. 299); and (3) in the direction of greater
length (figs. 93, p. 153, 94, p. 155, 309, p. 267, 361, 362, p. 295, and 363-368,
p. 297). These three main lines are as a rule quite distinct, but more or less inter-
gradation is observable between them, especially between the two last.
The slenderness of the cirri is one of the characteristic features of the Macro-
phreata and is very pronounced in almost all of the forms, being often carried to
an extreme. Similar slenderness of the cirri is rare in the Oligophreata, but is
found in some of the smaller or more delicate species, where as a rule it is an indi-
cation of the persistence or accentuation of an immature feature rather than an
acquired character, as in the Macrophreata.
Slenderness is the result of the great reduction in size of each of the component
segments, this reduction being in the nature of a great decrease in the amount of
calcareous matter, as if its outer surface had been rubbed away, leaving the length
as it was originally. This reduction of the calcareous matter affects the central
portion of the segments much more than the denser ends, so that in a lateral view
they appear concave dorsally and ventrally, slender in the middle with prominent
ends (fig. 396, p. 309), or, as happily expressed by P. H. Carpenter, ‘‘ dice-box
shaped.’ Owing to the fact that the length does not decrease in proportion to the
decrease in thickness they become proportionately elongated, sometimes exceedingly
long. The slenderness is sometimes carried to such an extreme that the cirri as a
whole appear like very slender, almost invisible, threads, with bulky knots at inter-
vals marking the articulation, as in Iridometra exquisita, Microcomatula mortenseni,
or Hathrometra sarsii (fig. 394, p. 309).
Combined with slenderness resulting from a great reduction of the calcareous
base of the segments, there is usually a further reduction brought about by the
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 289
strong lateral compression of the cirri; in other words, the reduction of the calea-
reous base usually takes place faster along the transverse than along the dorso-
ventral axis. This condition is not found outside of the Macrophreata, where it is
especially characteristic of the Atelecrinide (figs. 405, 406, p. 311, and 414, p. 319),
the Pentametrocrinide (fig. 404, p. 311), and the genera Psathyrometra (fig. 379,
p- 301), Thysanometra (fig. 372, p. 299), and Coccometra (figs. 374-376, p. 299) of the
Antedonide.
An increase in the stoutness of the cirri unaccompanied by any increase in the
length or in the number of segments—indeed sometimes correlated with a reduc-
TEEPE DEE o bos DDD LET LITO
SS
Fig. 345.
Fia. 348.
Fias. 345-348.—345, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF CENOMETRA UNICORNIS FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS VIEWED (a) DOR-
SALLY AND (b) LATERALLY. 346, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF CYLLOMETRA ALBOPURPUREA FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN VIEWED
(@) DORSALLY AND (0) LATERALLY. 347, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CIRRUS OF A SPECIMEN OF CYLLGMETRA MANCA FROM
THE Ki IsLANDS. 348, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF CYLLOMETRA MANCA FROM THE KI ISLANDS VIEWED (a) DORSALLY
AND (b) LATERALLY.
tion in regard to the latter—may be considered as among the chief characteristics
of the cirri of the Oligophreata, though it is much more marked in certain groups
or species than in others. In its simplest form it is best seen in the Charitometridx
(figs. 99, p. 160, 100, p. 162, and 369, 370, p. 299) and Comactiniine (figs. 76, p. 129,
and 327, 328, p. 281), and particularly in the Tropiometride (figs. 88, p. 145, and 356,
p- 293), where it is not obscured by an increase in the length of the cirri. In
these forms the cirri, like those of most of the Macrophreata, are of the same
nature throughout and show no division into specialized areas.
290 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
The elongation of the cirri, which is accompanied by an increase in stoutness,
is in its true phylogenetic aspect also almost exclusively peculiar to the Oligo-
phreata, occurring in the Macrophreata only in the single genus Zenometra (figs. 109,
p. 175, and 377, 378, p. 301). It is best studied in the Thalassometridx and Chari-
tometride. In the Charitometride (figs. 99, p. 160, 100, p. 162, and 369, 370, p. 299)
the cirri are short and stout, the segments, except for the first two, subequal,
usually somewhat longer than broad, becoming slightly shorter distally and smooth
dorsally, though the distal dorsal ends of the outer segments may be somewhat
swollen. Their surface is dull, due to the presence of a close fine pitting, and
their general coloration is dark, like that of the calyx and arm bases. The
terminal claw and the distal margin of the penultimate segment, however, have a
highly polished surface and are comparatively light in color.
In the Thalassometride (figs. 93, p. 153, 94, p. 155, 95, p. 157, 96, 97, p. 159, 361,
362, p. 295, and 363-368, p. 297) the proximal cirrus segments for a variable dis-
tance from the centrodorsal are well rounded in cross section, smooth, stout, and
comparatively dark in color, resembling exactly those of the Charitometride; then
comes a peculiar segment which I have designated as a transition segment (fig. 4,
p. 63). This transition segment typically decreases more or less in dorsoventral
diameter distally, and rather more rapidly in transverse diameter. In its proximal
half to three-fourths it is dark in color and in every way resembles the preceding
segments, but in its distal fourth to half it is highly polished and more or less later-
ally compressed, and light in color, and it bears a median projection on the distal
dorsal edge. Usually this segment is especially marked by a dark band about it
at the dividing line between the dull proximal and polished distal portions.
In its structure, and in its position in reference to the segments comparable
morphologically to its proximal portion (the preceding segments), it is the homo-
logue of the penultimate segment as seen in the Charitometride; but instead of
bearing a terminal spine it is succeeded by a series composed of a variable number
of short spinous highly polished segments which eventually terminate in a penulti-
mate segment and terminal claw as usual.
Considering the transition segment as representing the penultimate segment
of the Charitometride, the cirri of the Charitometride as a whole are the equivalent
of that part of the cirri of the Thalassometride up to and including the transition
segment. The segments found in the cirri of the Thalassometride beyond the
transition segment I interpret as additional segments morphologically the result
of budding or of a process of progressive serial reduplication from the primitive
penultimate segment as seen in the Charitometride, as a result of a phylogenetically
sudden increase in the length of the cirri over the short charitometrid type. The
typical elongation of the cirri as found in the Oligophreata, therefore, is not the
result of a phylogenetically gradual increase in the number of cirrus segments as in
the Macrophreata, but of a process of phylogenetically abrupt and sudden distal
elongation.
In the Thalassometride this transition segment is especially marked, and it
is almost equally evident in certain species of the Zygometridx, Mariametride,
Comasteridx, and of other families; but often it has lost, through the disappearance
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 291
in the ontogeny of the abrupt acceleration in cirrus growth which originally gave
rise to it, many of its peculiarities, so that it has become difficult to differentiate
from the other cirrals, and the segments grade more or less imperceptibly from the
long proximal into the short distal type.
<EELEETEE DED BE |
oD
<PEEEEPD DP DDD DI]
Fia. 351
é
Fig. 352.
Fias. 349-352.—349, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF DECAMETRA MOLLIS FROM KURRACHI VIEWED (a) DORSALLY AND (b) LAT-
ERALLY. 350, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF COLOBOMETRA DISCOLOR FROM THE EASTERN PART OF THE BAY OF BENGAL
VIEWED (a) DORSALLY AND (b) LATERALLY. 351, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF PROMETRA OWSTONI FROM
SOUTHERN JAPAN. 352, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF OLIGOMETRA SERRIPINNA FROM SINGAPORE VIEWED (@) DORSALLY
AND (b) LATERALLY.
In those oligophreate forms in which there is but little difference between the
proximal and distal segments, as in certain species of Amphimetra (figs. 86, p. 141,
335, p. 283, and 336, p. 285), in Cenometra (figs. 87, p. 143, and 345, p. 289), in Comac-
tinia echinoptera (fig. 328, p. 281), and in numerous species among the Himero-
292 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
metride, Mariametride (fig. 344, p. 287), and Stephanometride (fig. 340, p. 287), the
structure of the cirri appears to be quite comparable to that of the Charitometride,
and transition segments appear never to have occurred. On the other hand, in
a single genus of the Macrophreata, Zenometra, a more or less marked transition
segment is found, comparable in every way to that of certain of the Oligophreata.
There is a curious correlation between the cirri and the proximal pinnules;
species in which the latter are large, as Craspedometra acuticirra, as a rule have long
cirri with numerous segments, while species in which they are not especially de-
veloped, as Heterometra quinduplicava, commonly have cirri with fewer segments.
Again in certain species, as in Oligometra serripinna and in the species of Prometra,
there may be more or less variation in the number of segments in the enlarged
proximal pinnules; this is found upon examination commonly to agree directly
with a similar variation in the number of cirrus segments. This correlation is most
marked and most obvious in the Comasteride. In this family species with large and
very long proximal pinnules which are stout basally, like Comanthus bennetti or C.
pinguis, have very large and stout cirri with a large number of segments, while
species with a few small and weak cirri, or none at all, as Comanthus annulata or C.
parvicirra, or many of the species of the genus Comaster, have the proximal pinnules
small.
This interrelationship between the cirri and the proximal pinnules appears to
be confined to the Oligophreata, and in this group it is of more or less uncertain
occurrence, being by no means general.
There is a closer and more widespread agreement between these two sets of
structures in regard to the modification of the distal ends of the component segments,
an agreement which is further correlated with a similar modification of the ossicles
of the calyx, the division series and the arm bases. In cases where, as in Thalas-
sometra villosa, Stylometra spinifera, or in the species of the genus Colobometra, the
distal ends of the cirrus segments are produced and spinous, the calyx and arm bases,
as well as the distal edges of the segments of the proximal pinnules, will also be found
to be spinous, though this spinosity is less, and may be entirely suppressed on the
brachials, from the fourth onward, and on the genital and distal pinnules. This
type of correlation is not found outside of the Oligophreata, except in the genus
Zenometra.
The striking correlation, both in structure and in function, between the cirri
and the ungrooved pinnules in Comatulella brachiolata has already been discussed
in detail.
Mention must also be made of the curious case illustrated by the families
Thalassometride, Charitometride and Tropiometride. In the Charitometrids
and Tropiometride smooth and very stout cirri accompany very slender many
jointed proximal pinnules; the long and spiny cirri of the Thalassometride occur
together with greatly enlarged, swollen, and elongated proximal pinnules, the
accentuation of these characters in the latter being to a considerable degree cor-
related with the proportionate length of the cirri.
Though in Asterometra, Pterometra and Ptilometra (which together form the
subfamily Ptilometrine) the cirri are excessively long, and are in structure just like
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 293
Fig. 353,
Fig. 355.
Fig, 354.
abit pia
Fig. 356.
Fia. 357.
Fi@. 358,
Fis, 353-358.—353, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF OLIGOMETRIDES ADEONE FROM THE ARU ISLANDS VIEWED (a) DORSALLY
AND (b) LATERALLY. 354, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF OLIGOMETRIDES THETIDIS FROM NEW SouTH
WALES. 355, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF ANALCIDOMETRA ARMATA FROM THE CARIBBEAN SEA. 356,
A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF TROPIOMETRA PICTA FROM RIO DE JANEIRO VIEWED (@) DORSALLY AND (b) LATERALLY. 357,
LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF CALOMETRA CALLISTA FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN. 358, LATERAL VIEW OF A
CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF CALOMETRA SEPARATA FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN.
294 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
those found in the other genera of the Thalassometride, there is, curiously enough,
never the slightest trace of any modification of the proximal pinnules toward the
type found in the other genera of that group.
Dr. W. B. Carpenter has noticed in the growing young of Antedon bifida that,
as in other species, after the formation of the first two whorls of cirri no special
regularity can be traced in the manner of development; the young cirri normally
appear between those previously formed and the radial pentagon, so that their
sockets are close to the margin of the centrodorsal; but as the centrodorsal grows
and new cirri appear around its margin, the older cirri which are attached close to
the dorsal pole drop away and their sockets become gradually obliterated by cal-
careous deposit. The result is that the dorsal surface of the centrodorsal is usually
left comparatively smooth, but in some species the deposit of new material con-
tinues after the cirrus sockets are obliterated and causes the dorsal pole to become
rough and irregular. On the other hand, the lower surface of the centrodorsal in
most species of the Comasteride is almost flat and extremely smooth. This is
owing to the very extensive and uniform manner in which the new material is
laid down.
Dr. P. H. Carpenter noticed that the primary trunks which leave the chambered
organ, subsequently dividing and passing to the cirri in the corresponding radial
areas, usually undergo their division within the cavity of the centrodorsal. It
sometimes happens, however, that more or less of this division takes place within
the substance of the centrodorsal, so that interiorly there may be only one radial
opening visible, whereas outwardly there may be found the apertures of half a dozen
cirrus canals.
In regenerating cirri the basal segments are the longest, and the following
decrease rapidly in diameter, so that the whole cirrus tapers considerably from its
base to its point. This condition gradually becomes less and less marked as the
segments increase in size and their apposed faces become beveled off toward the
dorsal side, so that the cirrus ultimately acquires all the characters of maturity.
In the comatulids only the first few rows of cirri are developed, as described by
W. B. Carpenter. The cirri which appear subsequently gradually assume certain
of the developmental features of regenerating cirri, so that at the adult stage, and
usually some time before that stage is reached, the cirri which are constantly pro-
duced about the ventral margin of the centrodorsal arise exactly as if they were
formed at an old socket from which the original cirrus had been lost.
In very old specimens of certain species a peculiar condition is found among
these last formed marginal cirri, which was first noticed in Florometra magellanica.
The cirri are formed just as regenerating cirri, but with increasing age the ontogeny
of regenerated parts becomes gradually retarded, so that in old examples the last
formed cirri never assume mature characters, but remain slender and tapering.
As the assumption of a definite number of segments and the cessation of further
addition after the full number is reached is a true and definite growth character and
therefore dependent, like all other growth characters, upon the virility of the animal,
incipient senescence affects this likewise, and the marginal cirri of very old specimens
therefore possesses the number of segments characteristic of the adult, plus an
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 295
Fia. 361.
Fig. 362.
Figs. 359-362.—359, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A YOUNG SPECIMEN OF PTILOMETRA MOULLERI FROM NEW Bove WALEs.
360, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS OF A YOUNG SPECIMEN OF PTILOMETRA MACRONEMA FROM SOUTHWESTERN AUR
361, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF PTILOMETRA MULLERI FROM NEW SOUTH WALES. 362, LATERAL
VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF ASTEROMETRA MACROPODA FROM SOUTHWESTERN JAPAN.
296 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
indeterminate number, sometimes as many as an additional third, which are merely
the result of lessened vitality, causing an inhibition of the power to limit further
vegetative growth and to develop to maturity instead the segments already formed.
Care must always be taken in working with the comatulids to differentiate
these more or less rudimentary marginal cirri, which are usually longer and more
slender than the true mature cirri and have additional segments, from the cirri
which are properly characteristic of the adult.
These cirri are peculiar in that they never perform any grasping functions, nor
do they appear ever to become curved distally, remaining always nearly or quite
straight. They usually extend directly upward between the arms, reaching for
some distance beyond the tips of the oral pinnules. They appear to function as
tactile organs, assisting the oral pinnules, and in their tactile nature, as well as their
tapering build and polyarticular, yet practically undifferentiated, composition,
strongly suggest the antenne of insects, a similarity which is heightened by the fact
that, like antenne, they are developed at the anterior or proximal end of the series
of segmented appendages.
The systematic significance of the cirri varies very greatly in the different
groups. One family (Colobometride) is most easily recognized by the peculiarities
of the cirri, many genera find in these organs their most obvious distinguishing
characters, while specific determination rests largely upon their proportionate
length and comparative structure. In fact, taken as a whole, the cirri are of para-
mount importance from a systematic point of view, exceeding in the number,
variety and stability of the characters presented even the proximal pinnules which,
however, are a close second.
In general the cirri of the Comasteride, Zygometride and Mariametride are
more or less strictly comparable to those of the Thalassometride; the charitometrid
type is seen in Eudiocrinus (fig. 84, p. 137), Comactinia (figs. 76, p. 129, and 328,
p. 281), Catoptometra (fig. 334, p.283), Comatula (figs. 78, p.131, and 327, p. 281) and
Comatulides (fig. 80, p. 133); while the thalassometrid type prevails in Leptonemaster
(fig. 325, p. 279), Comissia, Capillaster (fig. 323, p. 277), Nemaster (fig. 324, p. 279),
Palzocomatella, Comatella (fig. 321, p. 277), Neocomatella, Comatulella and in
nearly all of the species of Comanthus and of Comaster, as well as in Zygometra
(figs. 332, 333, p. 283), Pontiometra (fig. 341, p. 287), and Epimetra. The cirri of
Comatilia and of Microcomatula are so very slender as to resemble most closely those
of the small antedonids, especially Iridometra and Compsometra.
Usually in the Thalassometride the production of the distal edges of the cirrus
segments as seen in those immediately following the transition segment is abrupt
and has a smooth sharp outer border, in an end view projecting from the general
profile of the segment in the form of a broad and flattened U; distally this gradually
narrows (coincident with the increasing dorsal carination of the segments), becoming
progressively more and more V-shaped, finally resolving itself into a carinate dorsal
spine. In the groups now under consideration, however, a slightly different
condition exists (fig. 323, p. 277); in the earlier segments following the transition
segment the production of the distal dorsal edge is in dorsal view broadly U-
shaped, and in end view appears as a low rounded serrate transverse ridge. The
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 297
Fig. 363.
Fig. 364.
Fig. 367.
Fia@. 368.
Fics. 363-368.—363, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF THALASSOMETRA PUBESCENS FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN.
364, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF THALASSOMETRA GIGANTEA FROM THE HAWAMAN ISLANDS. 365, LAT-
ERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF PARAMETRA FISHERI FROM THE HAWAMAN ISLANDS. 366, LATERAL VIEW OF
A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF COSMIOMETRA CRASSICIRRA FROM THE HAWAMAN ISLANDS. 367, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS
FROM A SPECIMEN OF COSMIOMETRA DELICATA FROM THE HAWAMNAN ISLANDS. 368, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A
SPECIMEN OF STYLOMETRA SPINIFERA FROM CUBA.
79146°—Bull. 82—15 20
298 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
serrations may be all small and subequal; but usually the projection is slightly
V-shaped, with a comparatively large tubercle at the apex of the V flanked on
either side by from two to five or six other smaller tubercles; perhaps the com-
monest arrangement is a large median tubercle with two or three smaller ones
(forming the sides of the V) on either side. Distally the median tubercle gradually
increases in size, the lateral tubercles at the same time gradually diminishing until
in the outer portion of the cirrus the median tubercle only remains, forming a prom-
inent dorsal spine. The resolution of the broad rounded finely serrate transverse
ridge into a dorsal spine follows the same lines as described for the dorsal processes
of the Thalassometride. .
In the subfamily Comactiniine a curious dimorphism of the cirri is found,
exactly comparable to a similar state of affairs in the antedonid genera Antedon and
Compsometra. The most perfected type of cirrus in Comactinia and in Comatula (figs.
76, p. 129, and 327, p. 281) has from 10 to 15 segments, of which the more proximal
(not including the basal) are elongated, centrally constricted, and broadly oval in
cross section, and the distal are short, broader than long or squarish, not constricted
centrally, but much flattened laterally, so that in lateral view the cirri appear to
increase considerably in diameter distally. The more primitive type of cirrus
possesses the same number of segments in the same species, but the segments are
subequal, becoming only slightly, if at all, shorter distally than they are in the
earlier part of the cirri, and the cirri appear in lateral view of equal diameter through-
out, as the distal portion is only very slightly flattened (fig. 328, p. 281).
These two very distinct types of cirri are correlated with the proportionate
amount of basal swelling in the arms and the shortening of the segments in the
earlier pinnules. In specimens or species in which the arms do not expand outward
from thefirst brachial (figs. 78, p. 131, 80, p. 133, and 108, p. 174), the cirri will be found
always to be of the second type; but if the arms gradually expand up to about the
twelfth or fourteenth brachial, slowly tapering from that point onward (figs. 76, p. 129,
and 107,p.173), then the cirri will be found to be, possibly with one or two exceptions,
of the first type. Among the Comactiniine, and to a lesser extent among the
Antedonine, the earlier pinnules of specimens or of species with swollen arm bases
and the first type of cirrus are composed of proportionately shorter and broader
segments than those with arms which taper evenly from the base to the tip and
with the second type of cirrus.
In Comatula pectinata or in C. purpurea, where the arms of the anterior ray
may be evenly tapering but the arms of the other rays swollen, there is frequently
a mixture of these two cirrus types, the proportion of the second to the first being
about the same as the proportion of slender to stout arms.
Both of these cirrus types occur frequently in the same specimen in Comatula
pectinata and in C. purpurea; both also occur, but, so far as I have seen, never in
the same specimen, in Comactinia echinoptera. In Comatula rotalaria, C. etheridger
and C. micraster only the second type is found; but all three of these species lose
their cirri before acquiring the swollen arms so characteristic of the adults.
Strangely enough, though the swelling of the arms is carried to an extreme in
Comatula solaris and in Comatulella brachiolata, the cirri of these two species are
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 299
Fia. 369.
Fig. 370.
. ; Fie. 373.
Fig. 371. >
Fig. 372.
Fia. 374.
Fig, 375. Fie. 376.
Fias. 369-376.—369, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF PACHYLOMETRA BOREALIS FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN. 370,
A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF GLYPTOMETRA LATERALIS FROM THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS VIEWED (@) DORSALLY AND (b) LATER-
ALLY. 371, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMPSOMETRA LOVENI FROM NEW SoutH WALES. 372, Lat
ERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF THYSANOMETRA TENELLOIDES FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN. 373, LATERAL VIEW
OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMPSOMETRA SERRATA FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN. 374, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS
FROM A SPECIMEN OF COCCOMETRA NIGROLINEATA FROM THE GREATER ANTILLES. 375, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A
SPECIMEN OF COCCOMETRA HAGENI FROM FLORIDA, 376, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF COCCOMETRA
GUTTATA FROM THE GREATER ANTILLES.
300 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
always of the second type, though they are peculiar in having short segments, par-
ticularly in thelatter. In the genus Antedon the four east Atlantic species (A. petasus,
A. bifida, A. moroccana and A. hupferi) have cirri of the first type combined with short
stout arms (figs. 103, p. 165, and 104, p. 167), as is also the case in the American
species, A. diibenii; while those of A. mediterranea and A. adriatica, confined to the
Mediterranean Sea, are of the second type, correlated with elongated and slender
arms (figs. 105, p. 169, and 106, p. 171). Compsometra incommoda (fig. 107, p. 173)
also possesses cirri of the first type combined with comparatively stout arms, while
its near relative, C. loveni (fig. 108, p. 174) has cirri only of the second type and
slenderarms. Iam notsure that the exceedingly long and stout cirri of Hathrometra
proliza, by which that species is at once differentiated from all the others of the
genus, and which are more or less strongly differentiated as a class from the smaller
cirri in the same species, should not be considered as belonging to the first type.
The cirri of the numerous species belonging to the Himerometride (figs. 335
p- 283, 336-339, p. 285), the Stephanometride (fig. 340, p. 287), and the Mariametride,
(figs. 341-344, p. 287), show great variation. Sometimes the charitometrid type may
be made out, sometimes the thalassometrid, and again the cirri appear to be of
the type indicating a slow and progressive increase in length as seen in the
Macrophreata. As a rule the dorsal spines. when developed are very long and
quite distinctive, though exactly the same type occurs in Zygometra (figs. 332, 333,
p- 283); they are often unusually long, and are slender, very sharp, subterminal to
almost median (distally), and make a very large angle with the longitudinal axis
of the segments, especially in the outer part of the cirri. This condition is per-
haps seen most perfected in Stephanometra echinus and in S. tenuipinna. Many
species belonging to these families have cirri which, though without dorsal spines,
are very sharply carinate dorsally in the outer part. This tendency to an excessive
dorsal compression is probably correlated with the length and slenderness of the
dorsal spines when they are developed. Running through the Himerometride (cul-
minating in Craspedometra) (fig. 85, p. 139) we notice a tendency toward a distal
tapering of the cirri, correlated with a proportionate increase in the length of the
distal segments and a progressive suppression of dorsal processes or carination;
the cirri of Craspedometra (fig. 85, p. 139) are very long with numerous segments,
smooth, very stout basally, but tapering to a slender sharp pointed tip, the length
of the segments increasing gradually from the base outward.
The cirri of the Colobometride (figs. 345-348, p. 289, 349-352, p. 291, and 353-
355, p. 293) are peculiar in being especially broad, and, though narrower distally,
they do not attain to any great degree of lateral compression. In Cenometra (fig.
345, p. 289) they are both broad and stout, composed of very short subequal segments
which have a more or less marked dorsal median longitudinal furrow, and bear on
each segment two dorsal spines, one on each side of the furrow. The cirri of
Oligometra (fig. 352, p. 291) are essentially the same as those of Cenometra; but the
very small size of the animals has endowed them with certain more or less primi-
tive characters; the component segments, which are subequal, are usually nearly
or quite as long as broad, and each (except a few at the base of the cirri) bears
dorsally an uninterrupted transverse ridge, strongly serrate along its crest which,
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 301
Fig. 379.
Fig. 377. Fia. 378.
Fia. 380. Fig, 381.
Fig. 382.
Fias. 377-382.—377, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF ZENOMETRA TRISERIALIS FROM THE HAWAMAN ISLANDS.
378, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF ZENOMETRA COLUMNARIS FROM GEORGIA. 379, LATERAL VIEW OF A
CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF PSATHYROMETRA FRAGILIS FROM NORTHERN JAPAN. 350, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM
‘A SPECIMEN OF ADELOMETRA TENUIPES FROM THE WEST INDIES. 381, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF
LEPTOMETRA PHALANGIUM FROM NAPLES. 382, CIRRI FROM SPECIMENS OF LEPTOMETRA PHALANGIUM FROM TUNIS, SHOWING
THE VARIOUS TYPES (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
302 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
like the paired spines in Cenometra, assumes a median position shortly after its appear-
ance; in the species of the genus Oligometrides (fig. 353, p. 293) the transverse ridge
moves to a position near the proximal edge of the segments, and a second transverse
ridge appears near the distal edge. The opposing spine of Oligometra (fig. 352,
p. 291) is slender, median, and perfectly erect, and the terminal claw, as usual in
the Oligophreata, is rather stout and strongly curved in its proximal third, becom-
ing more slender and nearly straight distally. The cirri in Cyllometra (figs. 346-
348, p. 289) in general resemble those of Oligometra, but they may be even more
primitive in having some of the earlier segments slightly elongated, though this
is only the case in a few species; the transverse ridge may be very high, taking
the form of a high tri- or bidentate dorsal spine. The cirri of Decametra (fig.
349, p. 291) and Petasometra are just like those of Cyllometra. The cirri of Colobo-
metra (fig. 350, p. 291), which are much elongated, are composed of segments which
are sometimes longer than broad proximally, very short distally; at first there
is a serrate transverse ridge, formed by the recession of the everted distal dorsal
ends of the segments, which soon divides in the middle and resolves itself into a
pair of dorsal spines; at the extreme tip these two spines fuse into one. The
proximal cirrals of Colobometra, like those of Zenometra (fig. 109, p. 175), have
the distal edges all around armed with long sharp spines, like the edges of the
calyx plates.
The cirri of the species of Atelecrinide (figs. 405, 406, p. 311, and 414, p. 319),
except Atelecrinus anomalus, are but imperfectly known, as the perfect tip has
never been observed. So far as can be seen they are of the same smooth, strongly
compressed type as that found in all of the Pentametrocrinide, and in such genera
as Iridometra, Coccometra, Psathyrometra and Thysanometra; except in Atelecrinus
anomalus (fig. 414, p. 319), which has cirri resembling those of Pentametrocrinus
tuberculatus, the component segments are greatly elongated, with somewhat swollen
distal ends, which are often more prominent along the ventral profile than along
the dorsal, the reverse of what is usually the case. At the present state of our
knowledge this feature is sufficient to identify the cirri of this family.
In the Pentametrocrinide (figs. 113, p. 181, 119, p. 185, 120, p. 187, 121, p. 189,
and 404, p. 311) the cirri are smooth, with more or less, often greatly, elongated
segments, which are strongly compressed laterally. In the species with very long
cirri, like Pentametrocrinus varians (fig. 119, p. 185) or P. japonicus (fig. 404, p. 311),
these end in a small, short and straight conical terminal claw; but in the species
with short cirri, like P. diomedex (fig. 120, p. 187) or P. tuberculatus (fig. 121,
p- 189), the terminal claw is considerably longer than the penultimate segment,
stout basally but tapering distally, comparatively straight in the basal half, but in
the distal half strongly curved downward.
The cirri of the species belonging to the large family Antedonide, as would
be expected, exhibit a very great degree of variation, though they are all constructed
after the same general plan. They may be described as more or less compressed
laterally, especially in the distal portion, slender, the earlier segments more or less
elongated and centrally constricted, the outer becoming slightly shorter, though
never very short, and without true dorsal spines (except in Zenometra), though the
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 803
SOC,
SSS
ee Ne ee
Fig. 383.
FIG. 383.—CIRRI FROM SPECIMENS OF LEPTOMETRA CELTICA FROM THE S:
EINE BANK, SHOWING THE VARIOUS TYPES (AFTER
P. H, CARPENTER).
304 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
overlapping edges of the segments may be pointed dorsally; the penultimate seg-
ment differs but little from the preceding, and almost always bears a terminal or
subterminal opposing spine, which, however, is never strongly developed; the
terminal claw is slender, never especially long, and always tapering evenly, and
evenly curved.
There are two lines of departure from this general type. One (which finds a
parallel in the Atelecrinide and Pentametrocrinidg) is in the direction of an elonga-
tion of the segments, especially distally, coupled with an increase in their number
and an excessive lateral flattening which extends far inward toward the base of
the cirri, and with the suppression of the opposing spine and great reduction and
straightening of the terminal claw; this reaches the maximum in Thysanometra
(fig. 372, p. 299), and is to be noticed in various degrees of perfection in the species
of Psathyrometra (fig. 379, p. 301), Thaumatometra, Iridometra, Compsometra, and
Coccometra (figs. 374-376, p. 299). In Leptometra (figs. 381, 382, p. 301, 383, p. 303,
and 384-386, p. 305), which is an offshoot from the Psathyrometra stock, this con-
dition has been carried to an extreme; but it has here been masked by an absence
of the reduction in the size of the cirri, whereby the expansion of the ends of the
segments and the characteristic lateral flattening have become more or less obso-
lete, the cirri as a whole tending toward the condition seen in Craspedometra (fig.
85, p. 139).
The elongation of the cirri may, however, be brought about in an entirely
different manner; the cirri at first may consist of some half dozen elongated
segments, the number gradually increasing in the subsequent cirri until sometimes
as many as 80, or even more, may be found in the longest. But the added seg-
ments do not resemble the earlier ones. The six segments of the cirri of the young
animal are repeated in all the subsequent cirri without change; the additional seg-
ments are added progressively at the distal end of the later cirri, and they are
progressively shorter and shorter until a minimum length is reached, which is
usually about equal to the transverse diameter, after which all the added segments
are the same. Cirri of this type (which merely differs from the type characteristic
of the Thalassometride in that the short segments are added gradually instead of
with phylogenetical suddenness) may be at once recognized by having the proximal
portion made up of elongated segments and the distal of a greater or lesser series
of short segments of equal size. Such cirri are found in Perometra (fig. 387, p. 307),
Erythrometra, Balanometra, Zenometra (more like those of the Thalassometrid here)
(figs. 109, p. 175, and 377, 378, p. 301), Adelometra (fig. 380, p. 301), Heliometra (fig.
392, p. 307), Solanometra, Anthrometra, and Florometra (fig. 391, p. 307), Promacho-
crinus, certain species of Coccometra and of Iridometra, Hathrometra, Trichometra,
certain species of Bathymetra (fig. 402, p. 311), Hypalometra (fig. 388, p. 307), and
Nanometra (fig. 390, p.307). In Perometra and in Zenometra we find the same factor
obscuring the general plan that was noticed in Leptometra; for the cirri have
become stout, so that in some cases the normal central constriction of the long
earlier segments has disappeared, the cirri are less compressed distally, and the
outer segments are much shorter than usual and are produced and strongly cari-
nate dorsally, just as in such genera as Asterometra (figs. 94, p. 155, and 362, p. 295),
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 305
Pterometra, Ptilometra (figs. 93, p. 153, and 361, p. 295) or Thalassometra (figs. 95,
p. 157, 96, p. 159, and 363, 364, p. 297).
Though the ultimate results of these two processes of elongation of the cirri,
ee
Fie. 384.
noe es ae
Fig. 385.
Ca = 2 SE
fn ce
Fig. 386.
Fias. 284-386.—384, CIRRI FROM SPECIMENS OF LEPTOMETRA CELTICA TAKEN IN THE MINCH, SHOWING THE VARIOUS TYPES (AFTER
P. H. CARPENTER). 385, CIRRI FROM SPECIMENS OF LEPTOMETRA CELTICA FROM OFF CAPE SAGRES, SHOWING THE VARIOUS
TYPES (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 386, CIRRI FROM SPECIMENS OF LEPTOMETRA CELTICA FROM THE SEINE BANK, SHOWING
THE VARIOUS TYPES (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
are very different in their appearance, the first giving elongate segments distally,
resembling those in the proximal portion, and the latter giving very short segments
distally, they are really the outcome of identical physiological or developmental
306 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
processes; for in each case there has been simply an elongation of the cirrus, the
produced tip remaining of the same type as the basal portion in the first instance,
but acquiring flexibility, and hence inducing a finer division of the primitive
homogeneous calcareous investment, in the second.
Both these processes may often be traced in a single specimen; for the short
cirri at the dorsal pole of the centrodorsal (fig. 310, p. 269) are really the persistent
cirri of the young which were formed at the time when the ventral rim of the
centrodorsal was only just anterior to the proximal (upper) border of their sockets,
and the succeeding cirri were likewise formed as the centrodorsal gradually
increased in size through additions to its ventral rim, each row of cirri representing
the stage at which the centrodorsal was only the equivalent in size of that portion
of the adult centrodorsal between the upper margin of that row and the dorsal pole.
By a study of the succession of the cirri in good specimens of Leptometra,
Thysanometra and Nanometra (fig. 310, p. 269) it is at once evident that in all cases
the cirri were at first of the type seen, in a slightly modified form, in Antedon medi-
terranea (figs. 105, p. 169, and 313, p. 271), but have become gradually modified
along the lines described until the adult type has been attained.
The sequence of the added segments in these forms is the same as that described
in the Thalassometride (p. 290), but with the difference that in the Thalassome-
tride, as in most of the Oligophreata, there was a crystalization of the type of cirrus
at or near the stage seen in the Charitometride (figs. 99, p, 160, and 100, p. 162)
and in Tropiometra (fig. 356, p. 293), and the change from the short stout and
smooth type to the long, more slender, and spiny type was effected by a cumula-
tive phylogenetic force, restrained for a long time by the inertia of long-established
habit of form, which finally burst its bonds and all at once gave rise to the per-
fected cirri, such as are seen in the Thalassometride (figs. 93, p. 153, 94, p. 155,
95, p. 157, and 96, 97, p. 159). The Macrophreata were much more plastic, and
had no primitive fixed cirrus type, so that cirrus development has progressed
evenly without any sudden eruption of long pent up phylogenetic force, and each
stage shows merely a uniform and slight advance over the preceding.
There is no correlation whatever observable between the type of cirrus and the
character of the centrodorsal except in such secondary ways as where an increase
in the size of the cirri is accompanied by a corresponding increase in the size of
the centrodorsal, but without any other change in its general form.
Long cirri with comparatively long segments proximally and very short seg-
ments distally are found irregularly placed in from one to three rows on a hemi-
spherical or thick discoidal centrodorsal showing no radial resorption in:
Comanthus (part). Oxymetra.
Zygometra (part). Dichrometra (part).
Amphimetra (part). Cenometra.
Himerometra (part). Colobometra.
Heterometra (part). Cyllometra.
Pontiometra. Decametra.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 307
Fig. 388.
Fic. 387.
Fig. 390.
Fig. 393.
Figs. 387-393.—387, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF PEROMETRA DIOMEDE® FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN. 388
LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF HYPALOMETRA DEFECTA FROM THE WEST INDIES. 389, LATERAL VIEW OF
A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF TRICHOMETRA ASPERA FROM THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES. 390, LATERAL VIEW OF
A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF NANOMETRA BOWERSI FROM SOUTHWESTERN JAPAN. 391, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM
A SPECIMEN OF FLOROMETRA ASPERRIMA FROM ALASKA. 392, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF HELIOMETRA
MAXIMA FROM THE SEA OF JAPAN. 393, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A YOUNG SPECIMEN OF HELIOMETRA GLACIALIS
FROM DAVIS STRAIT, IN THE SHORT, STOUT, AND SMOOTH CHARITOMETRID STAGE
308 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Similar cirri, very numerous and very closely crowded, are found on a deep
hemispherical or conical centrodorsal in:
Perometra. Hathrometra.
Hypalometra. Nanometra.
Erythrometra. Heliometra.
Trichometra. Solanometra.
Promachocrinus.
Similar cirri, arranged in ten well separated columns, are found on a conical
or columnar centrodorsal which shows extensive radial resorption in:
Pterometra. Stenometra.
Asterometra. Stiremetra.
Thalassometra (part). Cosmiometra (part).
Stylometra. Zenometra (part).
Crotalometra. Balanometra.
Adelometra.
Similar cirri, arranged in fifteen columns, which are segregated into radial
groups of three columns each, are found in:
Zenometra (part).
Similar cirri arranged in fifteen crowded columns on a large thick-discoidal
centrodorsal with no radial resorption, are found in:
Ptilometra. Palzocomatella.
The short stout type of cirrus, as seen in Tropiometra, Catoptometra, Eudio-
crinus, and in the Charitometride is found with the same five types of centrodorsal
as the long and spinous, though the frequency of the various combinations is dif-
ferent, the emphasis being on the first and fifth combinations instead of on the
first and second.
All the other types of cirri occur only on the surface of centrodorsals which
range from discoidal to hemispherical or conical, with no differentiation into radial
areas, and may be in from one to six or even more rows, alternating, very closely
crowded, or with each socket more or less isolated. In general, very slender cirri
are numerous and very closely crowded, while stouter cirri are fewer and more
scattered; with slender cirri also the centrodorsal is larger and more hemispherical
or conical in shape; but this is due to the fact that slender cirri are only found
among the macrophreate forms in which this type of centrodorsal prevails.
In the smaller groups, such as families or subfamilies, the combination of a
certain cirrus type with a particular type of centrodorsal is always of the greatest
importance in defining genera, and often also in defining species.
If we based our deductions upon the study of the comatulids alone, reasoning
from the most complex to the most generalized, we should certainly arrive at the
conclusion that the cirri of the comatulids were at first five in number, just as we
find them to-day five in number in the very young and in the nodals of the penta-
crinites, and that each of the five cirri arose beneath the center of the corresponding
radial. At the same time we should suppose that the postradial series of ossicles
consisted of a linear series, so that the primitive comatulid would be pictured as a
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 309
Fi. 394.
Fig. 395.
a ie
Fic. 398.
Fic. 399.
4
Fig. 400. Fie. 401.
Figs. 394-401.—394, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A FULLY GROWN PENTACRINOID LARVA OF HATHROMETRA SARSII FROM
Norway (AFTER M. Sars). 395, THE TIP OF A SMALL CIRRUS FROM A FULLY GROWN PENTACRINOID LARVA OF HATHROMETRA
SARSIT FROM NorwWAY (AFTER M. SARS). 396, A SECTION FROM THE MIDDLE OF ONE OF THE LONGER CIRRI OF A FULLY
GROWN PENTACRINOID LARVA OF HATHROMETRA SARSII FROM NORWAY (AFTER M. SARs). 397, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS
FROM A SPECIMEN OF HATHROMETRA SARS FROM NORWAY (CAMERA LUCIDA DRAWING BY THE AUTHOR). 398, THE TIP OF
A SMALL CIRRUS FROM A FULLY GROWN PENTACRINOID LARVA OF HATHROMETRA SARSI FROM NORWAY (AFTER M. Sars).
399, A DEVELOPING CIRRUS FROM A FULLY GROWN PENTRACRINOID LARVA OF HATHROMETRA SARSI FROM NORWAY (AFTER
M. Sars). 400, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF TRICHOMETRA AMERICANA FROM THE GRAND BANKS.
401, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF HATHROMETRA DENTATA FROM SOUTHERN MASSACHUSETTS.
310 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
creature with five arms like Pentametrocrinus and a centrodorsal bearing five cirri,
in every way like the nodal of an Jsocrinus.
We should imagine that the increase in the number of the cirri took place by a
process similar to, though entirely independent of, the method of reduplication of
the arms, and that the first step was a pairing or twinning of the primitive cirrus
elements, whereby 2 cirri, just alike, were produced in each radial area instead
of the original 1, exactly as the 10 arms of most comatulids arose from the orig-
inal 5. Each of the 10 arms in the various pairs is practically the exact duplicate
of its fellow, and the pairs are separated from the radial by the interpolation of 2
ossicles which are reduplicated repetitions of the 2 first ossicles in either arm,
which themselves are a pair of twins derived phylogenetically from the first 2
ossicles of the primitive unpaired arm, this in turn being the resultant from 2
pairs of primitive ambulacral plates.
In the case of the cirri the division of the originally single cirrus into two would
take place at the base, as in the case of the arms, but the base is entirely within the
centrodorsal, and usually within the free central cavity so that the cirri, instead
of appearing externally as a paired organ appear as two similar organs side by side,
usually slightly displaced by crowding. Further reduplication of the cirri might
have been carried on in either of two ways: (1) A more or less continuous budding
might take place, the original cirrus stem putting forth additional cirri as a tree puts
forth branches; or (2) the paired condition may be reduplicated, giving rise to cwrri
in paired columns.
By this reasoning we see how the body appendages, both the arms and the
cirri, reduce themselves each to a single simple linear series of essentially similar
segments; that is, to a pair of such appendages to each half somite, comparable to
the paired somatic appendages of the crustaceans. No comatulid is highly special-
ized, and none are primitive, in all their characters, but each type is composed of
characters some of which are highly specialized while the remainder are primitive,
the characters changing their relative balance in each group, though a general
balance is observable everywhere. In the comatulids as we know them, that is,
without regard to their phylogenetic history, the very large centrodorsal with ex-
ceedingly numerous cirri is probably the most primitive type, as most nearly ap-
proaching the conditions found in the closely related pentacrinites, but this is always
associated with a high grade of specialization in other structures. Conversely,
the most primitive type of comatulid arm is invariably found with highly specialized
cirri and an enormously developed musculature.
The relationship of the chief types of cirri to the larger systematic groups is
briefly shown in the following table:
A. Short, stout and smooth cirri, with a small number of similar and subequal
segments.
B. Longer cirri with more numerous segments, of which the distal are shorter
than the proximal and bear dorsal processes.
©. Enormously elongated cirri, with the same structure as those grouped
under B.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS, 311
Fie. 402. Fia. 403.
Fia. 404.
Fig. 405.
eS Se
é
Fig. 406.
Figs. 402-406.—402, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF BATHYMETRA BREVICIRRA FROM THE WESTERN BERING
SEA. 403, LATERAL VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF BATHYMETRA MINUTISSIMA FROM BRAZIL. 404, LATERAL
VIEW OF A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF PENTAMETROCRINUS JAPONICUS FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN. 405, LATERAL VIEW OF A
CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF ATELECRINUS CONIFER FROM THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS. 406, A CIRRUS FROM A SPECIMEN OF
ATELECRINUS BALANOIDES FROM PORTO RICO VIEWED (@) DORSALLY AND (b) LATERALLY.
312 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
‘D. Greatly elongated cirri tapering to a sharp point; the distal segments are
elongated and without dorsal processes; there is no opposing spine and the terminal
claw is nearly straight.
Comasterids (the emphasisiat)B)222 52-5208 ee ees ee ean means
Zyzometride; Antedonid:.-... 2... 2. 22 422) ele ae ee Pea ee
inaroueinaa (the emphasis at B) dn yates oe ga 1b, ChD
Stephanometride ; Mariametride ; Colobometride (the empha-
BIS. Bb By eee oe aS a oe he ie, ne ae nme ee ee EV OO
Tropiometridi =. cnn so-- os nana Sora A
Calometridee __ _. _- LAS gee Se NU ee ce B
Thalassometride (the emphasis at C) ek ee ous ee ee me
Charitometride (the SmDnAGI RO Pol Nena ett amas A,B
Pentametrocrinide ; Atelecrinide _- 3 by ASST)
The interrelationships between the various ie of euri ‘aad of centrodorsals,
and the relations of both to the larger systematic groups, are briefly shown in the
following table:
A. The primitive type of centrodorsal.
B. Thick discoidal or columnar centrodorsals, tending to become more or less
conical; the cirrus sockets are in columns, three or more to each radial area, but the
radial areas are not marked off from each other.
C. Columnar or conical centrodorsals, with the surface distinctly marked off
into radial areas; the cirrus sockets are in three columns in each radial area.
D. Columnar or conical centrodorsals, much reduced in size; the surface is
sharply differentiated into radial areas; the cirrus sockets are in two columns in
each radial area.
A. Short, stout and smooth cirri, with a small number of similar and subequal
segments.
B. Longer cirri, with more numerous segments, of which the distal are shorter
than the proximal and bear dorsal processes.
C. Enormously elongated cirri, with the same structure as those grouped
under B.
D. Greatly elongated cirri tapering to a sharp point; the distal segments are
elongated and without dorsal processes; there is no opposing spine and the terminal
claw is nearly straight.
Centrodorsal. Cirri.
Comiasteridseicte eh are ae a er ane A Fala tos
Aygometrid se: Hee LS eee ae a ee A ASB Ow
Eimerometrid sa. eae ee a A BCGOD
Stephanometride; Mariametride; Colobo-
MOtrid ss | 7h et ERE ae en ae eee A BG
‘Dropiomoetrids .92- sss ase A A
Calometride: _ _ OPEN ey eat Tt ee A B
Thalassometrids. 2 Sisson ee eID) B,C
Charitometride. 955 aetna. o> oe eA OB) A,B
Amtedonide: 22 2. ea oe ee = oe ee DD RCA) A, B, C, D
Pentametrocrinidis-e- saen eee eee eee A A, D
Atelecrinides. 2... cae eee es ee C-D A, D
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 313
Infrabasals.
In the crinoids the infrabasals normally form a closed cirelet of five small
plates about the dorsal apex of the animal, resting with the inner portion of their
external faces upon the topmost columnal (figs. 570, 571, pl. 7).
The infrabasals, which correspond to the oculars in the echinoids, are inter-
somatic in position, each being situated directly beneath a radial; they alternate
with the larger basals, which, forming a similar closed circlet just beyond them,
are midsomatic in position and correspond to the echinoid genitals.
The infrabasals are the first plates in the intersomatic or radial series, and are
the only true calyx plates belonging to that series, the radials and following ossicles
being, strictly speaking, brachials.
Ordinarily the plates succeeding the infrabasals are arranged uniserially, at
least for a short distance; but in the genera Promachocrinus and Thaumatocrinus
(figs. 113, 114, p. 181) each infrabasal is followed by two radials instead of by the
usual one so that the arrangement here is in certain respects homologous to that
which is found in those echinoids which possess multicolumnar ambulacral series.
There appears to be a definite connection and correlation between the infra-
basals (and the oculars, which correspond to them in the echinoids) and the suc-
ceeding series of plates, just as there is a definite correlation between the basals and
the orals, though of entirely different significance.
In the urchins the oculars always stand at the head of the ambulacral series,
from which they are never separated. In certain erinoids a subradial plate occurs
between the basals beneath the right posterior radial which connect the infra-
basals and the radials, representing the entire ambulacral series of the urchins
except for the plates immediately surrounding the peristome, which correspond to
the radials. This, however, is an exceedingly rare condition.
While in the echinoids the oculars always remain extremely important con-
stituents of the test, and are perhaps the most important plates of the coronal ring,
the general tendency in the crinoids has been toward the suppression of their
equivalents, the infrabasals, and with the suppression of the infrabasals has come
the similar suppression of the following series of plates which are usually, and
always in the later types, dispensed with altogether except for the radials, repre-
senting the echinoid ambulacrals immediately surrounding the peristome, and these
are now separated from the infrabasals by a closed circlet of basals.
In the blastoids the conditions are essentially similar to those in certain crinoids;
there are no infrabasals, and the ambulacral or radial series is reduced to the forked
plate, corresponding to the radial, which encloses the ambulacrals, corresponding
to the brachials of the crinoid arm.
In the crinoids the infrabasals lie at the distal end of the radial water tube, in
exactly the same position as the oculars are found in the echinoids. The water
tube of the arms is in reality merely a side branch from the true water tube, which
runs around the side of the body from the circumoral ring to the infrabasals, and
has no further morphological significance. Though in the later crinoids the water
tube leading from the edge of the disk to the infrabasals is insignificant when com-
79146°—Bull, 82—15——21
314 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
pared with that of the arms, in the earlier forms, in which the calyx was very large
and the arms very short, the latter must have been very insignificant when com-
pared with the former.
In studying the homologies of the echinoid and crinoid plates in the developing
young we are at a great disadvantage; for in the young crinoid the infrabasals are
so atrophied as largely to have lost any fundamental significance which they may
originally have had; the plates (theoretically) normally present between the infra-
basals and the radials do not appear at all, except for the right posterior which is
formed, very late in life, far out of its normal position; and the basals have become
enormously enlarged, composing the entire dorsal investment of the calyx and, being
in mutual apposition, widely separating the infrabasals from the succeeding plates in
the radial series.
As I understand it, it is the atrophy of the infrabasals, the suppression of the
plates between the infrabasals and the radials, and the enormous growth of the
basals which have combined to exclude the infrabasals from their primitive posi-
tion and primitive connection with the distal end of the water tube.
But it should be emphasized that the water tube grows not only outward into
the arm (an offshoot of purely secondary morphological importance) but downward
into the centrodorsal; in other words, it eventually comes into its true relations with
the infrabasals by growing beyond the radials.
In the later fossil and in the recent crinoids the infrabasals are greatly reduced
and functionless, or absent altogether; but as the structure of the animals by the
application of the well known law of Wachsmuth and Springer is shown to be
dicyclic it is assumed that they are either present in the young, but become resorbed
during the ontogeny, or that they have so recently disappeared that their effect
upon the general structure still persists.
In many of the later fossil and in the recent crinoids (excepting those of the
family Plicatocrinide) the column is characterized by a definite growth limit after
reaching which no further development occurs, but the topmost columnal enlarges
and becomes permanently attached to the calyx by close suture, forming a so-called
proximale which is in all essentials an apical calyx plate. With this proximale the
infrabasals, greatly reduced and concealed by the column, fuse, forming with it
what is practically a single ossicle. This condition occurs in all the recent coma-
tulids in which infrabasals have been observed, the centrodorsal being formed
partly by the greatly enlarged topmost columnal, now become an apical calyx plate,
and partly by the circlet of infrabasals fused with it.
In the two pelagic comatulids, Marsupites and Uintacrinus, we find, as would
be expected, an aberrant partial reversion to primitive conditions resulting from
the absence of a column and the consequent absence of the factors which call for
a great reduction in size of the calyx plates and for their coalition into a compact
mass. In Marsupites, which is an extreme type, the five infrabasals are of enor-
mous size (fig. 565, pl. 7), as large as the basals and the central apical plate, and
form a very important part of the calcareous investment of the body. The enor-
mously elongated arms of Uintacrinus necessitated a great reduction in the size of
the plates covering the body, though in this genus we frequently, but not always,
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 315
find a circlet of small free unmetamorphosed infrabasals surrounding the central
apical plate (fig. 572a pl. 7).
In the pentacrinites the proximale never becomes attached to the calyx, but is
continually reduplicated, each reduplication as it is formed being shoved away from
the calyx by the formation of another between it and the calyx plates, all the multiple
proximales later becoming separated from each other by the intercalation of a
definite number of so-called nodals (fig. 127, p. 197). Thus there is no opportunity
offered for the infrabasals to fuse with the proximale, and so in the pentacrinites
we find them forming a definite circlet of minute plates within the circlet of basals
and entirely concealed by the column (figs. 566-568, pl. 7).
In the Plicatocrinide (figs. 144, p.207 and 145, p. 209) there is no evidence what-
ever of the possession of infrabasals, and also there is no evidence that they ever
existed in any of the ancestors of the family, the Plicatocrinide being as anomalous
in this regard as they are in respect to their columns. In all the other recent
forms, however, infrabasals are either actually or potentially present.
Among the recent comatulids, though all are shown to be dicyclic by the
application of Wachsmuth and Springer’s law, only three species, all belonging to
the same family and two to the same genus, are definitely known to possess infra-
basals, and in all of these they are present as individual plates only in the very
young pentacrinoid, at a very early stage fusing with the topmost columnal or
proximale to form, in conjunction with it, the centrodorsal.
Infrabasals have been conclusively demonstrated in Antedon mediterranea by
Bury (figs. 569-571, pl. 7), and in A. adriatica by Seeliger. I have found them to
be large and well developed in Promachocrinus kerguelensis.
Observations which seem to show that they are not developed in the young
have been made on Antedon petasus (Mortensen), A. bifida (Wyville Thomson, W.
B. Carpenter, P. H. Carpenter, Perrier, and the present author), A. moroccana
(Perrier), Compsometra loveni (the present author), Hathrometra proliza (Mortensen
and the present author), H. sarsii (M. Sars), Ptilometra miilleri (H. L. Clark and
the present author), Comactinia meridionalis (Mortensen and the present author),
and Comanthus wahlbergii (the present author).
Most of these observations, however, can not be considered as at all conclusive,
as the material available for study was very limited.
In Atelecrinus balanoides P. H. Carpenter noticed that within the ring formed
by the persistent unmetamorphosed basals excessively delicate processes project
inward from near the lateral margin of each basal; it is possible that these proc-
esses are the remains of infrabasals, which have been for the most part resorbed.
In Antedon mediterranea Bury found that the infrabasals make their appear-
ance in the larva early on the seventh day. They are found at the posterior (i. e.,
proximal) end of the series of columnars, and in form resemble small basals, though
they are developed at a much deeper level and are usually nearer the posterior
end of the body than the two ventral basals. They are typically three in number
(rarely four or five) and are at first equal in size; but after a while two of them
begin to grow more rapidly than the third, eventually becoming about double its
size. The smallest infrabasal lies in the anterior radial area of the adult, cor-
816 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
responding to the radius opposite the interradius containing the water pore. The
infrabasals, like the other plates, seem at first to avoid the ventral side, and in
the rare cases where five infrabasals are developed, they appear to be arranged
in the form of a horseshoe, quite as widely open ventrally as that of the basals
and orals. At the time of the fixation of the larva the inner border of each infra-
basal becomes smooth and concave, and they then arrange themselves in a circle
around the chambered organ just above the topmost columnal. The arrangement
of these plates is still the same as in the earlier stage, the smallest plate being in
radius A. At a slightly later stage these three plates fuse with one another and
with the topmost columnal so as to form one large plate. Though the sutures of
the infrabasals still persist, the plates themselves have grown out into five angles;
these angles are radial in position, fitting in between the edges of the basals and,
while the infrabasal in radius A produces only one angle, each of the other two
grows out into two angles; at a slightly later stage the sutures disappear, though
the groove separating the infrabasals from the topmost columnal persists for some
time. The whole large plate formed by the coalition of the circlet of infrabasals
with the topmost columnal is therefore in reality a double structure, the lower half
only being the true centrodorsal.
In Antedon adriatica Seeliger found that the infrabasals are developed at a
little over four days; they are usually four or five, rarely three, in number. The
two lateral infrabasals on either side lie moderately near together, and may be
the morphological equivalent of Bury’s large lateral infrabasals observed in A.
mediterranea.
In Promachocrinus kerguelensis the infrabasals, which are five in number, are
much larger than in the two species of Antedon in which they have been found, and
remain distinct from the centrodorsal until a considerably later period. They are
all of approximately equal size, forming a circlet of rounded plates about the top of
the column.
It is indeed strange that such painstaking and accurate observers as Thomson,
Perrier, and the two Carpenters should have overlooked such prominent structures
in Antedon bifida if they really occur in that species. Antedon adriatica is the
least specialized of all the species of the genus, and A. mediterranea is only slightly
more advanced; the former has four or five underbasals, the latter three. Antedon
bifida, A. moroccana, A. petasus, A. hupferi and A. diibenii represent phylogeneti-
cally a great step in advance over the two Mediterranean forms, and it is quite
within the bounds of possibility that, as a result of acceleration of development,
all traces of infrabasals have been lost in the ontogeny of these five Atlantic species.
Basals, and structures formed from and associated with them.
The basals, primarily five in number, in the later crinoids typically form a circlet
about the apical portion of the body between the circlet of infrabasals and the
cirelet of radials, with both of which they alternate in position, being midsomatic
or interradial (figs. 565, 566, pl. 7, 576, pl. 9, 579, pl. 11, and 583, pl. 12); they cor-
respond to the genitals of the echinoids.
In nearly all of the recent crinoids the basals are abnormal in their develop-
ment; they may be reduced to three, as in Hyocrinus, Thalassocrinus (fig. 145, p. 209),
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 317
SS
fics? 5
Fe OO
6695000,
Fia. 409.
Fia. 410.
Fig. 413.
Fig. 407. Fia. 411,
Figs. 407-413—407, A VERY YOUNG PENTACRINOID LARVA OF HATHROMETRA SARSIT FROM NORWAY, SHOWING THE LONG
BOURGUETICRINOID COLUMNALS, THE SCALLOPED TERMINAL STEM PLATE AND, IN THE CROWN, THE BASALS AND ORALS (AFTER
M. Sars). 408, A YOUNG PENTACRINOID LARVA OF COMACTINIA MERIDIONALIS FROM YUCATAN, SHOWING THE LARGE
BASALS, THE ORALS, AND THE BEGINNINGS OF THE RADIALS. 409, A YOUNG PENTACRINOID LARVA OF HATHROMETRA
PROLIXA FROM EAST GREENLAND, SHOWING THE BASALS AND THE ORALS, AND THE BEGINNINGS OF THE RADIALS. 410, A
YOUNG PENTACRINOID LARVA OF CoMPSOMETRA LOVENI FROM PorT JACKSON, NEW SouTH WALES. 411, A YOUNG PENTA-
CRINOID LARVA OF COMACTINIA MERIDIONALIS. 412, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CROWN AND PROXIMAL COLUMNALS OF A YOUNG
PENTACRINOID LARVA OF COMACTINIA MERIDIONALIS FROM YUCATAN, SHOWING THREE INTERRADIALS INSTEAD OF THE MORE
USUAL ONE, 413, LATERAL VIEW OF A YOUNG PENTACRINOID LARVA OF HATHROMETRA SARSH FROM NORWAY, WITH THE
IBR) JUST FORMING (AFTER M. SARs).
318 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
and Ptilocrinus (fig. 144, p. 207); they may be immensely elongated, as in Demo-
crinus (fig. 133, p. 203); they may be turned inward so that they come to lie more
or less parallel to the dorsoventral axis and fused into a solid conical or subcylin-
drical ring or plate, as in Rhizocrinus, Bathycrinus, and Monachocrinus (fig. 134, p.
203, they may be turned outward so that they le flat and form a platform upon
which the radials and the calyx rest, as in the pentacrinites; or they may be entirely
metamorphosed so that they come to form an internal septum, as in the great
majority of the comatulids.
In the progressive specialization and perfection of the phylogenetic line ter-
minating in the comatulids and the pentacrinites the chief factor involved is the
progressive reduction and strengthening of the calyx. First the subradial and
interradial plates dwindle and disappear, persisting longest in the posterior inter-
radius and beneath the right posterior ray; next the infrabasals become affected,
decreasing in size and often also in number, gradually leaning outward and con-
tinually decreasing the diameter of their circlet until they become quite negligible
as integral parts of the skeletal system, when they fuse with the proximale or
disappear altogether; after the infrabasals the basals become affected, in their
degeneration following much the same path as that previously taken by the infra-
basals; they decrease in size and often become reduced to three, at the same time
either gradually leaning outward so that they ultimately form a small platform
upon which the radials and the visceral mass rest and finally, through a curious
process of metamorphosis, passing around the dorsal nerves and reappearing as a
thin septum between the dorsal nervous mass and the visceral cavity, or gradually
leaning inward and fusing so that they form a truncated conical plate or ring which
is in effect nothing more than a first columnal.
Among the recent comatulids the genera Atelecrinus (figs. 123, p. 192, 124,
125, p. 193, 414, p. 319, and 573, pl. 8, and Atopocrinus (fig. 227, p. 245) are the
only ones in which the basals persist as basals instead of becoming metamorphosed
into arosette. In the species of Atelecrinus, excepting only in A. anomalus (fig.
414, p. 319), in which they are still very large, the basals have become arrested in
their specialization so that in the adults they are at approximately the same onto-
genetical stage as are those of Antedon at the time of the beginning of the free exist-
ence (fig. 594, pl. 16), or as are those of the pentacrinites. As described by Car-
enter ‘‘they are in complete contact laterally so as to form an unbroken ring about
the central opening of the calyx”’ which is ‘‘encroached upon by excessively delicate
processes that project inward from near the lateral margin of each basal.” These
delicate processes may possibly represent the partially resorbed infrabasals.
Carpenter notes that in the young Atelecrinus balanoides (fig. 573, pl. 8) the
basals externally ‘‘form a kind of belt of tolerably uniform height with the inter-
radial angles somewhat produced which everywhere separates the * * *
radials from the centrodorsal.’’ He notes further that ‘‘the extent of development
of the basals varies with the size of the individual, apparently diminishing with
age. * * * Jn the smallest specimen they are wide but low pentagons which
fall away very rapidly from their interradial apices to the points where they meet
one another beneath the radials. The middle of each basal rests on the top of one
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS, 319
Fig. 415,
Figs. 414-415.—414, LATERAL VIEW OF A SPECIMEN OF ATELECRINUS ANOMALUS FROM THE EAST INDIES, SHOWING THE VERY
LARGE BASALS AND THE COMPARATIVELY SHORT AND STOUT CIRRI. 415, LATERAL VIEW OF A YOUNG INDIVIDUAL OF SOME
SPECIES OF CHARITOMETRIDE FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, SHOWING EXCEPTIONALLY LARGE BASAL RAYS,
320 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
of the interradial ridges at the upper end of the centrodorsal. * * * The pen-
tagonal shape of the basals is still traceable in slightly older specimens * * *
but in still older ones * * * the amount of the radials which is visible on the
exterior of the calyx becomes relatively less and less, and the same is the case
with the basals. These are best described as triangular, with their lower angles
extended so as just to meet those of their fellows and separate the radials from the
centrodorsal by what is practically little more than a line, only visible at all under
specially favorable conditions of light.”” Carpenter believed that even this is
absent in part of some of the specimens, so that the radials actually come into
partial contact with the centrodorsal. This has been found to be the case in speci-
mens recently collected, in some of which the basals are only to be seen in the
angles of the calyx, where they are scarcely so prominent as are the basal rays in
many forms.
The basals of Atelecrinus were said to be comparable to those of the penta-
crinites; the comparison may be made still closer if the pentacrinite genus Endozo-
crinus is suggested, for in Endoxocrinus there are no infrabasals, and the basal ring,
therefore, is quite free interiorly.
In all the recent comatulids excepting Atelecrinus the basals in the adult
become metamorphosed into a peculiar plate, aptly termed by W. B. Carpenter the
rosette. In the words of Carpenter, the rosette of Antedon bifida ‘‘may be described
as consisting of a disk perforated in the center, with ten rays proceeding from it,
five of these rays being triangular in form and nearly flat whilst each of the other
five that alternate with these has parallel margins inflected on its ventral aspect in
such a manner as to form a groove, whilst the ray curves to its dorsal aspect in such
a manner as to bring this groove to the periphery of the rosette, and then terminates
abruptly as if truncated. Around the central perforation we sometimes find on the
ventral surface an irregular raised collar, obviously corresponding to the central
passage of the annulus of the pentagonal base, but more commonly this is replaced
by a number of vertical processes irregularly disposed. Its diameter in a full-grown
specimen is about 0.045 inch. When we look at this rosette in position we find that
the five triangular rays are directed to the sutures between the five radials, their
apices joining the contiguous pairs of these just between their two adjacent aper-
tures leading to the radial canals, whilst each of the five spoutlike rays join the
inflected margins of the former, being applied to the borders of the vertical furrow
of the latter in such a manner that the two grooves are united into a complete canal.”
Notwithstanding the apparent continuity between the calcareous reticulation of
the rosette and that of the pentagonal base at the extremity of each ray of the
former, Carpenter was ‘‘disposed to think the continuity not real, since, after
boiling in a solution of potash, the rosette separates itself from the radials without
any positive fracture at these points. A real continuity, however, would seem to
exist between the central prolongations of the radials and the discoidal portion of
the rosette, these prolongations attaching themselves to it either separately or
after coalescing with each other either to a slight extent or so completely as to
form the collar just described, and this junction being so complete that its sepa-
ration can only be effected by fracture.”
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 321
b
a
Fig. 419.
a
Fig. 421.
Fig. 426.
Fia. 424.
Fig, 429. Fic. 430.
Fig. 427.
Figs. 416-430—416, AN ISOLATED BASAL RAY FROM A SPECIMEN OF NEOCOMATELLA ALATA FROM THE WEST INDIES VIEWED (a)
VENTRALLY AND (b) DORSALLY (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 417, AN ISOLATED BASAL RAY FROM A SPECIMEN OF TROPI-
OMETRA PICTA VIEWED (a) DORSALLY AND (b) VENTRALLY (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 418, AN ISOLATED BASAL RAY FROM
A SPECIMEN OF SOLANOMETRA ANTARCTICA FROM THE ANTARCTIC OC VIEWED (a) VENTRALLY AND (0) DORSALLY (AFTER
P.H.CARPENTER). 419, AN ISOLATED COMPOUND B LFROM A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA ROTALARIA VIEWED (@) VENTRALLY
AND (b) DORSALLY (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 420, A COMPOUND BASAL FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA
FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS VIEWED (@) VENTRALLY AND (6) DORSALLY (AFTER P. H.CARPENTER). 421, AN ISOLATED
COMPOUND BASAL FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMACTINIA MERIDIONALIS VIEWED (@) VENTRALLY AND (6b) DORSALLY (AFTER
P. H. CARPENTER). 422, AN ISOLATED COMPOUND BASAL FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA PECTINATA VIEWED (a) VE
TRALLY AND (b) DORSALLY (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 423, VENTRAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF
TROPIOMETRA PICTA WITH TWO RADIALS REMOVED, SHOWING A BASAL RAY IN POSITION (AFTER P. H.CARPENTER). 424,
TWO UNITED COMPOUND BASALS FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS VIEWED
DORSALLY (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 425, TWO UNITED COMPOUND BASALS FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA
FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS VIEWED VENTRALLY (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 426, TWO UNITED COMPOUND BASALS
FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA VIEWED VENTRALLY (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 427, DORSAL VIEW_OF A
RADIAL FROM A SPECIMEN OF NEOCOMATELLA ALATA FROM THE WEST INDIES WITH A BASAL RAY ATTACHED (AFTER P. H.
CARPENTER). 428, VENTRAL VIEW OF A ROSETTE FROM A SPECIMEN OF ANTEDON BIFIDA FROM ENGLAND WITH TWO SPOUT-
LIKE INTERRADIAL PROCESSES AND A BASAL BRIDGE CONNECTING THE ENDS OF TWO RADIAL PROCESSES (AFTER P. H. Car-
PENTER). 429, DORSAL VIEW OF A ROSETTE FROM A SPECIMEN OF ANTEDON BIFIDA FROM E ND WITH TWO SPOUT-LIKE
INTERRADIAL PROCESSES AND A BASAL BRIDGE CON, ? THE ENDS OF TWO RADIAL PROCESS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER.
430, AN ISOLATED BASAL FROM A SPECIMEN OF ATELE US BALANOIDES VIEWED (a) FROM THE INNER END AND ()) DORSALLY
(AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
322 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
Speaking of the rosettes of all the comatulids in which he knew them, P. H.
Carpenter says: ‘“‘The inflected margins of these five radial spoutlike processes
are applied to the similarly inflected margins of the dorsal half of the axial radial
furrow, lying between the two apertures of the central canal on the internal face
of each radial. In this manner a complete radial canal is formed which terminates
on the dorsal surface of the radial pentagon, or becomes closed before it reaches the
dorsal surface by the union of ingrowths developed from its walls. Besides this very
intimate union between the peripheral portion of the rosette and the internal faces
of the radials, its central portion is also frequently connected with the radial penta-
gon by delicate processes which sometimes sprout forth irregularly from the inner
margins of the component pieces of the latter, but sometimes form a more regular
ingrowth which considerably contracts the central space on the ventral aspect of
the disk and becomes continuous with an annular projection from the ventral face
of the rosette.”
Of the basals at their maximum development in Antedon bifida,W. B. Carpenter
writes: ‘‘At the beginning of the free stage the circlet of basals, which for the most
part is concealed externally by the centrodorsal, is found, when exposed by the
removal of the latter, to differ very little either in size or aspect from the circlet first
completed in the pentacrinoid. The form of each plate is an irregular trapezoid with
its lower angle truncated, and it still retains the solid pellucid margin which origi-
nally characterized it. But it has undergone a remarkable thickening by an endog-
enous extension of its calcareous network, and this has taken place in such a manner
as to leave its substance channeled out by a canal which commences at its lower
truncated angle and almost immediately bifurcates, the two branches diverging in
such a manner as to pass toward the two radials which severally abut on the sides of
the upper triangle of each basal. This canal gives passage to a large sarcodic cord
that proceeds from the wall of the chambered organ. Each of the five primary
cords (which originally lay on the internal surface of the basals forming the floor
of the calyx) subdivides into two branches within the basal whose canal it enters,
and thus each of the radials receives two branches supplied to it through the two
basals upon which it rests.”
Regarding the formation of the rosette he says: ‘“‘The mode in which the
rosette is formed by the remodeling and subsequent coalescence of the five basals,
and in which the sarcodic extensions of the central axis, which are transmitted
through the radials to the arms and pinnules, come to lie on the dorsal or external
face of the rosette, is as follows: The cribriform plate of which each basal at first
entirely consisted is so much thickened by endogenous growth during the later
stages of pentacrinoid life that the radial sarcodic cords come to be entirely invested
by calcareous reticulation; and the floor of the ventral cavity shows no inequality
as we pass from the central portion formed by the basals to the peripheral formed
by the radials. Very soon after the detachment of the young Antedon, however,
a remarkable change begins to show itself in the basal pentagon, which is now
entirely concealed externally by the extension of the centrodorsal over its dorsal
surface; for the cribriform film of which each basal plate was originally composed,
and which still forms its external layer, now undergoes resorption, especially where
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 323
it covers in the radial prolongation of the axis, so that the central space left by the
incomplete meeting of the valves of the basal pentagon is extended on its external
aspect into five broad rays, though on its internal or ventral aspect, where it is
bounded by the last-formed portion of the endogenous reticulation, it shows no
corresponding increase. This removal of the older and outer part of each basal
plate by resorption, and the consolidation of the newer and inner by additional
calcareous deposit, go on at a rapid rate, so that in specimens whose size and general
development show but little advance upon the earliest Antedon type we find the
basals already modeled into such a form that their coalescence will produce a
somewhat unshapely rosette. In figure 584, plate 12, is shown the dorsal aspect of
one of the basal plates in which the removal of the external layer has been carried
so much further that what is now left of it constitutes only a kind of thickened
margin along those sides of the plate which are received between the radials, and
by an extension of the same process along the median line of each plate until the
external layer has been completely removed from its salient angle the two lateral
portions of that layer separated from each other (at their distal ends) and remain
only as a pair of curved processes extending themselves from the inner layer in
such a manner as to give to the plate when viewed from its ventral side somewhat
of the aspect of a saddle. When the five basals thus altered are in their normal
apposition the curved processes on either side of each plate come into contact with
the corresponding processes of its next neighbor, and the junction of the two forms
a sort of ray curving toward the dorsal aspect (this being the rudiment of one of
the five radial or spoutlike processes). As each plate thus contributes the half
of two of these curved rays, five such rays are formed between the five salient
processes which are put forth by the internal or ventral layer on the median lines
of the five plates and are received into the retreating angles formed by the junction
of the radials. Very soon an actual continuity is established in the calcareous
reticulation along the lines of junction and the rosette is completed, although the
peculiarity of its shape becomes much more strongly pronounced with the subse-
quent increase of its size. Thus the rosette is essentially formed at the expense of
the secondary or ventral layer of the original basals, the ends of the curved rays (or
spoutlike processes) being the sole residue of their primary or dorsal layer, and
since, by the removal of the median portion of that layer in each plate the primary
basal cords are left bare on their dorsal aspect, they now pass from the central axis
(the chambered organ) into the canals of the radials on the outside (dorsal side) of
the calcareous skeleton which occupies the central part of the base of the calyx
instead of reaching these by passing (as they did in the first instance) along its
internal (ventral) face or (as at a later period) through the middle of its substance.’’
In regard to the relationship between the rosette and the axial nerve cords,
P. H. Carpenter says: ‘Each of the primary basal cords, which are interradial in
position, divides into two branches toward the periphery of the rosette, on the
dorsal (outer) surface of which it rests. These branches lie in the shallow channels
which mark the union of the base of each interradial triangular process with the
two curved lateral processes, each of which unites with a corresponding process
from the adjacent basal to form one of the five spoutlike processes of the rosette.
324 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
3
The apex of each triangular process is directed to the suture between two con-
tiguous radials to which it is attached just between the two adjacent apertures of
their central canals. Into these canals pass the secondary basal cords, one into
each of the two contiguous radials, so that one lies on each side of the interradial
process of the rosette.
“As a general rule this process, both in Antedon and in Leptometra (‘Antedon
phalangium’’) (figs. 428, 429, p. 321, and 589, 590, pl. 14), is short, triangular, and
slightly curved toward the ventral side. It is not always so, for I [Carpenter] have
frequently met with specimens of Antedon in which one or more of the interradial
processes of the rosette, after bending for a short distance toward the ventral side,
turns suddenly downward and extends toward the dorsal surface of the radial pen-
tagon. At the same time the parallel margins of each of these abnormally devel-
oped processes are so inflected toward the dorsal surface as to form a narrow
interradial spoutlike process. This is so applied to the projecting and similarly
inflected outer edges of the adjacent openings of the central canals in two contigu-
ous radials as to convert the interradial furrow lying between them into a com-
plete axial interradial canal, precisely similar in character to the radial axial canals.”
Carpenter met with one extreme case in which four of the five interradial
processes of the rosette were of this character. He states that this is the normal
condition of the interradial processes in the Comasteride and in many of the endo-
cyclic forms.
He continues: “Not only the interradial, but also the radial processes of the
rosette in Antedon may exhibit departures from their usual shape; for the removal
of the primary or dorsal layer at the salient angle of one or more of the five embryonic
basals may be incomplete so that the ends of the curved rays of the rosette exhibit
lateral processes which are the remains of the upper margins of the primitive basal
plates on which the radials rested. Occasionally the apex of the original basal is
left unabsorbed, so that the two lateral curved processes which remain after the
removal of the primary external layer along the median line of each plate remain in
connection with one another. * * * The triangular interradial process, which
is developed from a secondary calcareous deposit on the ventral side of the original
basal, has here become more or less completely united with these primary bars con-
necting the two lateral portions of the basal. The latter retain their primitive rela-
tion to the radials, for they remain united with them along the inner margin of their
dorsal faces; and as they partially cover in the secondary basal cords on their
dorsal aspect before they enter the central canals of the radials, I [Carpenter] will
call them the basal bridge.”
This basal bridge is a characteristic feature of the structure of the Comasteride,
and of many of the other oligophreate comatulids, but is only rarely evident in
Antedon or in Leptometra.
P. H. Carpenter says: ‘This tendency to an incomplete metamorphosis of the
embryonic basals of Antedon, and consequently to the abnormal persistence of a more
embryonic condition than usual, is of considerable interest, because in the Comas-
teride and in many of the Oligophreata a basal bridge, representing the apex and
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 325
unabsorbed margins of the embryonic basal plates, is normally present, while at
the same time * * * the interradial processes of the rosette are large and
spouthke * * * and acquire a connection with the remains of the primary or
dorsal layer which forms the basal bridge. The complicated rosette thus formed
becomes united with the large, more or less spindle-shaped rays of the basal star,
the origin of which is totally different from that of the rosette.”
Carpenter found that the rosette in Leptometra lies much nearer the dorsal
surface of the radial pentagon than that of Antedon, and he also found that the
rosette of the species of Comasteride and of certain other oligophreate forms is
much better developed than that of these two genera. This was as much as he was
able to learn from the material at his command.
In general the rosette of the Oligophreata differs from that of the Macrophreata
in being more flattened, with the radial and interradial processes nearly on the same
plane, and in being more developed, so that its total area is proportionately greater
and the 10 rays proportionately shorter and more specialized, the interradial
processes typically differing but slightly from the radial. It is also sunken consid-
erably below the level of the dorsal surface of the radial pentagon, having retreated
before the chambered organ and associated structures as they were shoved upward
by the increasing shallowness of the centrodorsal. The greatest departure from the
macropheate type is seen in the large comasterids, such as Comatella nigra, Comaster
noveguiner, Comactinia echinoptera and Comatula pectinata, though about the same
stage is seen in certain of the thalassometrids, as in Asterometra and in the Calome-
tride. In many cases there has been such a development of calcareous tissue as
to conceal entirely the spaces between the 10 rays when the rosette is viewed in
position, while usually these are only visible as 10 shallow rounded notches, all of
equal size.
The perfected state of the rosette in these forms is not acquired until the animals
are of their full size and development, the rosettes of the younger specimens being
more like those of the less specialized forms.
The rosettes of the species of Zygometride, Thalassometride and Tropio-
metride usually have less developed interradial processes than those of the species
of Comasteride, the gaps between the radial and interradial processes are deeper,
and the interradial processes curve inward (ventrally) somewhat, so that they make
a slight angle with the plane occupied by the radial processes.
In the species of Himerometride, Stephanometride, and Mariametride the
rosette is still smaller, the gaps between the radial and the interradial processes
being deeper and broader, and the interradial processes are much more slender
than the radial, and curve upward at a considerable angle. The rosette of the
type most commonly seen in the Mariametride differs but little from that of
Antedon bifida and, as in that species, is usually but slightly sunk below the level
of the dorsal surface of the radial pentagon, giving evidence of the comparatively
close relationship between the more generalized mariametrids and the more
specialized antedonids such as those composing the subfamily Antedonine, evi-
dence which is in agreement with the deductions gathered from a study of other
characters.
326 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Among the Macrophreata the rosette is typically approximately on the same
level as the dorsal surface of the radial pentagon. It is thin and delicate, with long
and slender rays of which the interradial are but narrow bands or triangular processes
of caleareous tissue, though the radial may have their edges more or less everted.
In the Pentametrocrinide it is especially reduced and is very delicate, more so than
in any other group. In Coccometra, Compsometra and Antedon, and especially in
Heliometra and Florometra, it shows more or less approach to the form seen among
the species of Himerometridz or Mariametridx, and may also be more or less sunken
below the level of the dorsal surface of the radial pentagon. In Psathyrometra I
was not able to find any rosette at all; but I had only a single specimen available
for dissection, and the rosette may have been loosened by the alkali by which the
skeletal elements were separated and have fallen out.
In many forms the interradial furrows on the dorsal side of the radial pentagon
are very highly developed, and are occupied by five long processes which radiate
outward from the angles of the central cavity in which the rosette lies, forming what
are known as basal rays.
Speaking of these P. H. Carpenter says: “‘In Antedon bifida the edge which sep-
arates the lateral and dorsal faces of each radial is tolerably sharp and straight; but
in other species, as in Comatula solaris, it is somewhat truncated, so that when the
lateral faces of two radials are in apposition a deep interradial furrow appears along
the line of union of their dorsal surfaces, which is continued toward the dorsal or
outer surface from the central or inner aspect of the pentagonal base.”’
The basal rays are formed by the more or less complete calcification of the cen-
tral portions of the great mass of fibrous tissue developed along the interradial por-
tions of the centrodorsal and of the pentagonal base of the calyx, which lie within
these furrows.
Carpenter says: “At the proximal end of the basal ray are two openings, one
on either side, which give passage to the secondary basal cords; and they are sep-
arated when seen from the dorsal side by the interradial process of the rosette with
portions of the basal ridge. The lateral boundaries of these openings are formed by
the halves of two of the radial spouts of the rosette which extend outward from the
base of the interradial process and represent the unabsorbed lateral portions of the
primary layer forming the embryonic basal. plate. The ventral side of the basal
ray in Neocomatella alata, Comactinia meridionalis, Comatula rotalaria, and in many
other oligophreate species, is marked by a relatively large depression which forms
the central end of the axial interradial canal. This descends into the calyx over
the apposed lateral edges of two radials. But in most cases it ends blindly without
reaching the dorsal surface of the radial pentagon at all.”
The origin of the basal ray, which is formed by a more or less complete calci-
fication of the central portion of the highly developed interradial masses of fibrous
tissue, ‘‘accounts for the fact * * * that there is no pigment in the substance
of the rays of the basal star * * * nor in the walls of the basal grooves on the
centrodorsal, nor in those of the dorsal interradial furrows on the inferior surface of
the pentagonal base, which are calcifications of the smaller lateral masses of long
fibers running directly from the organic basis of the centrodorsal into that of the
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS.° 327
radials. These lateral fibers have a common point of origin in the substance of
the centrodorsal with the vertical and diverging fibers around which the calcareous
tissue of the basal rays is deposited. It is therefore easy to understand that the
calcification may in some cases be so complete that the basal rays formed around
the median fibers may become completely united with the walls of the basal grooves
formed around the lower ends of the two lateral fibrous masses. The fact that the
rays of the basal star are calcifications in connective tissue and not in the ordinary
nuclear tissue which forms the organic base of the other parts of the skeleton also
affords an explanation of the great variations in the extent to which the rays are
developed.”
A single compound basal (figs. 416-422, p. 321), as the structure formed by the
union of the basal ray and the interradial processes of the rosette has been happily
termed by P. H. Carpenter, consists of two distinct elements; (1) the incompletely
metamorphosed embryonic basal, and (2) asingleray of the basalstar. ‘‘An isolated
compound basal which is thus constituted, when seen from its dorsal side, shows
(1) more or less of the calcareous network which unites the ventral surface of the
rosette to the internal faces of the radials; (2) a large interradial spout-shaped
process; (3) two small radial curved processes extending outward from the base of
the interradial process and representing the unabsorbed lateral portions of the
primary layer forming the embryonic basal plate; (4) the basal bridge, consisting of
two calcareous bars that represent the unabsorbed peripheral margins of the embry-
onic basal on which two radials rested; they extend toward one another from the
outer ends of the small radial processes until they meet at a point that represents
the apex of the embryonic basal, and is situated on the dorsal side of the peripheral
end of the interradial process developed from the secondary or ventral layer, which
becomes united with the basal bridge; (5) the ray of the basal star which is joined
to the interradial process, and to the basal bridge along the line of union of the two
primary bars constituting the latter, with one another, and with the secondary inter-
radial process, i. e., the apex of the embryonic basal. The development of this ray
is quite different from that of either the primary or the secondary portions of the
compound basal. It is really a tertiary structure, being nothing more than a depo-
sition of calcareous material in the substance of the connective tissue of the synos-
tosis between the centrodorsal and the radial pentagon; (6) at the sides of the inter-
radial process, bounded laterally by the radial process, and externally by the bars
of the basal bridge, are two large apertures in each compound basal. Through
these apertures pass the secondary basal cords which result from the bifurcation of
the primary cords proceeding from the angles of the chambered organ. The two
secondary cords lie in the depressions on the dorsal surface of the compound basal
between the central ends of its radial and interradial processes. They then pass
outward through the apertures beneath the bars of the basal bridge and enter the
adjacent openings on the internal faces of the two contiguous radials, which con-
tribute to form the dorsal interradial furrow occupied by the single fusiform ray
of the corresponding basal. The ventral surface of each of these rays of a compound
basal is not flat like the dorsal surface, but is occupied by a prominent median ridge,
so that the ray is triangular in section. This ridge does not extend quite to the
328 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
inner end of the ray, which is occupied by a considerable depression forming the
peripheral end of the groove contained in the spoutlike process. In the natural con-
dition when the basals are in place and in connection with the radial pentagon, the
inflected edges of this process unite with those of the axial interradial furrow to form
an axial interradial canal. This terminates on the dorsal surface of the radial
pentagon by a small opening situated at the central end of the dorsal interradial
furrow, in which furrow the tertiary element of the corresponding compound basal
is received. The depression at the central end of the ray les over this opening,
and thus forms a blind end to the axial interradial canal, just as the depressions on
the ventral surface of the centrodorsal of Antedon receive the blind ends of the
axial radial canals which open on the dorsal surface of the radial pentagon by the
five large openings.”
The basal rays are most uniformly developed and largest in the Comasteride
(figs. 416, 419-422, 424-497, p. 321, 229-234, p. 247, 236-242, p. 249, and 243-249,
p- 251). So far as is at present known they occur in all the species of the family,
though frequently they are not long enough to reach the exterior of the calyx.
They may form long prisms with parallel sides, or may be more or less expanded
at the base or distally. Frequently the terminal portion bifurcates so that the tip
is bilobed (fig. 229, p. 247). ;
In the species of the families Himerometride (figs. 253-255, p. 253, and 256-258,
p- 255), Mariametride (figs. 259-261, p. 255), and Colobometride they are frequently
lacking; I have not found them in Himerometra martensi (fig. 254, p. 253), Amphi-
metra philiberti (fig. 258, p. 255), A. ensifer (fig. 256, p. 255), Craspedometra acuticirra
(fig. 255, p. 253), or in Mariametra subcarinata (fig. 260, p. 255). When they do occur
they form slender prismatic rods which often do not reach to the exterior of the
calyx. These rods have parallel sides, and are more slender than similar structures
in the Comasteride.
The basal rays of the species of Thalassometride (figs. 267-273, p. 259), as a rule,
are small, like those of the Himerometride or Mariametride, or may be entirely
wanting. In Ptilometra (figs. 267, 271, p. 259) and Asterometra (fig. 268, p. 259) the
basal rays are only faintly indicated. They do not appear to be found as such, but
the radial areas on the ventral surface of the centrodorsal are delimited by more or
less numerous parallel grooves under the interradial angles of the radial pentagon.
In a very few forms, as in Stylometra spinifera (fig. 273, p. 259), however, they are
large and prominent.
As in the Thalassometride, the basal rays of the species of Charitometride (figs.
274-279, p. 260) are, as a rule, small, or may be entirely wanting. Occasionally
they are large and prominent, as in Crinometra (fig. 276, p. 260). The largest basal
rays ever observed in any recent crinoid were in a young specimen of a species
of Charitometride (fig. 415, p. 319).
Basal rays are entirely absent from the species of the family Calometride
(fig. 263, p. 257).
In the family Tropiometride (figs. 264-266, p. 257) the basal rays are well
developed and have a regular distal taper.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 329
Among the macrophreate forms basal rays are seldom developed. They are
found in the large species of Promachocrinus (figs. 294, p. 263, and 505, p- 371), Helio-
metra (figs. 292, 293, p. 263, and 507, p. 371), and Solanometra (figs. 295, p- 263, and
506, p. 371), but they are usually more or less imperfectly formed, and may be quite
insignificant or entirely lacking. They are rather large in the only specimen of
Thysanometra (fig. 285, p. 261), which I have been able to dissect. In Psathyrometra
(figs. 208-213, p. 241, and 502, p. 369) and Zenometra (figs. 214-216, p. 241, and 558,
pl. 5), they are prominent externally, where they bridge over the subradial
clefts in the interradial angles; but in Psathyrometra everything except the distal
ends appears to have been resorbed, for they only extend inward a very short dis-
tance from the periphery of the calyx, there terminating abruptly, so that in a dorsal
view of the radial pentagon they appear merely as five small calcareous masses, one
in the outer part of each of the interradial areas. I found them to be rather well
developed in the single specimen of Coccometra hagenii (fig. 284, p. 261), which I
dissected, though they did not occur in the specimens dissected by Carpenter.
They were not found in Pentametrocrinus japonicus (fig. 299, p. 264), P. varians,
Compsometra loveni (fig. 282, p. 261), Hathrometra prolixa, H. tenella, H. dentata
(fig. 290, p. 262), Erythrometra ruber (fig. 288, p. 262), Trichometra aspera (fig. 291,
p- 262), 7. vexator, Perometra diomedex (fig. 289, p. 262), or in Antedon (figs. 280,
281, 283, p. 261, and 593, pl. 15); nor were they evident in the specimens of the
oligophreate species Neometra multicolor (fig. 263, p. 257), Calometra separata,
Catoptometra hartlaubi (fig. 251, p. 253), Zygometra comata (fig. 252, p. 253),
Mariametra subcarinata (fig. 260, p. 255), Craspedometra acuticirra, Himerometra
martensi (fig. 254, p. 253), Pontiometra andersoni (fig. 261, p. 255), Amphimetra
philiberti (fig. 258, p. 255), or A. ensifer (fig. 256, p. 255), which I was able to examine.
As stated by Carpenter, they are not found in Leptometra (figs. 500, 501, p. 369).
Large basal rays occur, just proximal to the extremely reduced and Jaminar
basals, in Atopocrinus (fig. 227, p. 245).
Systematically the basal rays are of very uncertain value, and one must be
exceedingly cautious in drawing conclusions from their presence or absence. Among
the Comasteride they are usually diagnostic enough to admit of the reference of a
specimen to that family upon the characters afforded by them, particularly the
more or less localized expansion; but in the other families any dependence upon
them is very hazardous, more so even than upon the characters furnished by the
rosette. They are occasionally valuable indices, for a specimen possessing them
will usually be found to belong to the Oligophreata, though this is by no means
always true.
To state it broadly, basal rays are developed in all of the Comasteridx, and in
all of the Tropiometridx, in many of the Thalassometridx and Charitometride, in
a few of the Himerometride, Mariametridx, and Colobometride, and in half a dozen
or so of the macrophreate species, mostly large ones, and mainly those which show
an approach to the Oligophreata in other ways; in other words, they occur in such
species as possess radials nearly or quite horizontal in position, while they become
less and less evident as the radials take on a progressive upward slant.
79146°—Bull. 82—15——22
330 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
The appearance of the basal rays externally as small, rounded tubercles in the
interradial angles of the calyx just above the rim of the centrodorsal is a character-
istic feature in certain species, particularly among the Comasteridx, Thalassome-
tride, and Charitometridx, in the genera Zenometra and Psathyrometra, and some-
times, though seldom, in [eliometra, Solanometra, Anthometra, Florometra, Proma-
chocrinus and Thaumatocrinus. But in many cases they may be comparatively
well developed, yet not reach the exterior, or they may reach the exterior in only
one or two of the interradial areas. This is particularly the case in species having
large centrodorsals. In species with small or resorbed centrodorsals, as in the
majority of the Thalassometride and Charitometridx and in many of the Comas-
teridx, they are, if present at all, very prominent in all the interradial angles, and
if the centrodorsal becomes during growth much reduced in size, as often occurs. in
such genera as Comanthus, Comaster, Comanthina, Comantheria or Comatula, it
never recedes in the interradial angles beyond the external ends of the basal rays,
however much it may recede in the radial areas, so that from this cause a sharply
stellate centrodorsal is frequently formed in which the pointed ends of the star are
tipped by the external ends of the basal rays.
Occasionally, through individual variation, the external ends of the basal rays
may be very large, as in a small specimen of some charitometrid species from the
Philippine Islands, which I have had an opportunity of studying (fig. 414, p. 319),
so that they are almost as prominent a feature of the calyx as the basals in Jsocrinus
decorus, which they much resemble.
The so-called basals in the well-known case of the recent ‘‘ Comatula multiradi-
ata”’ (Comanthus bennetti), described and figured by Goldfuss, were merely similarly
enlarged basal rays.
In many fossil comatulids what appear to be true basals are visible on the
exterior of the calyx; but I have little doubt that in most, if not in all, of these
cases what appear to be basals are in reality nothing but the ends of large and well-
developed basal rays, similar to those in the small specimen of a charitometrid
species referred to above. Carpenter believed that, as the ends of the so-called
basals in certain fossil comatulids project beyond the margin of the centrodorsal,
it is scarcely probable that they could have arisen from the calcification of the
interradial portions of the union between the radial pentagon and the centrodorsal.
But the same thing happens in many recent species, especially among the Thalasso-
metride and Charitometride, where there can be no doubt of the secondary origin
of these structures. In these fossil species the central ends of the five so-called
basals are in contact laterally for a short distance instead of being united by narrow
bars, forming a basal bridge. From this circumstance Carpenter believed that at
least the central ends of these structures are homologous with the true basals of
stalked crinoids. The same state of affairs, however, has been found in Promacho-
crinus, a near relative of Solanometra and of Heliometra, in which there is no reason
to suppose that these contiguous inner ends of the basal rays are true basals.
In the Pentametrocrinidx and Zygometride, as well as in some of the Antedon-
idx, rounded tubercles are found in the interradial angles of the calyx, which, though
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 3381
separated from the radials by suture, are not separated from the centrodorsal (figs.
234, p. 247, and 250, p.253). Externally these tubercles have all the appearance of
true basal rays, but on dissection they are found to be merely interradial eleva-
tions on the ventral surface of the centrodorsal, exteriorly marked by a tubercle,
but forming an integral part of the centrodorsal and in no way separable from it.
These pseudobasal rays may be joined about the central cavity of the centro-
dorsal by a pentagonal raised area, just like the radial accessory bridge, which, as
explained above, often joins the inner ends of the basal rays; but, like the pseudo-
basal rays themselves, this structure is only an integral part of the centrodorsal,
not adhering to the radials, as do the true basal rays and their dependent structures.
I have found these pseudo-basal rays to be especially prominent in Coccometra
hagenii (fig. 284, p. 261) and in Eudiocrinus ornatus (fig. 250, p. 253), and, without
the radial connective, in certain of the Pentametrocrinide (fig. 299, p. 264).
Structurally these are part of the centrodorsal and are in no way distinguishable
from it, but morphologically they are true basal rays, developed for the purpose of
filling up the gap caused by the dorsal interradial furrow, though their substance
merges imperceptibly into that of the centrodorsal instead of being more or less
sharply differentiated from it. There is no distinct line of demarkation between
the pseudo-basal rays and true basal rays, all intergrades being found within the
family Antedonide, and apparently even within certain species of that family.
Radianal.
Hitherto the radianal plate, though a fundamental structure in many fossil
forms, has been supposed to be unrepresented in the recent types. The penta-
crinoid young of the comatulids possess a plate in the anal interradius, situated
between the two posterior radials, to which the name of anal has been universally
applied, on the assumption that it is the homologue of the so-called anal x of the
fossil forms (figs. 553, pl. 5, 560, 563, pl. 6, 576, pl. 9, 588, pl. 13, and 594, 596,
pl. 16).
Now all the work previously done upon the developing crinoid has been based
upon one or other of the species of the genus Antedon, one of the most specialized
of the genera in the group to which it belongs, and hence one of the least satis-
factory for purposes of phylogenetic investigation.
Examination of a fine series of the young of Promachocrinus kerguelensis has
brought out many points which the larve of Antedon do not show, and, among
other things, has made it clear that the so-called anal of the young of the coma-
tulids is homologous not with the anal x of the fossil types, but with the radianal.
In Antedon the so-called anal plate is formed, at about the period of develop-
ment of the IBr,, between the two posterior radials; but is it noticeable that while
the radial to the left of it is of normal shape that to the right has its left side more
or less cut away for its reception (fig. 563, pl. 6). When the ‘‘anal” is lifted out
from the circlet of radials just previous to its resorption it is noticeable that it
_keeps to the right of the posterior interradial area, remaining more or less in con-
tact with the right-hand radial and first primibrach instead of being drawn directly
upward, as would be expected (fig. 553, pl. 5); also the right radial is asymetrical,
332 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
more convex on the right side than on the left (adjoining the ‘‘anal”), though
after the withdrawal of the ‘“‘anal” this asymetry quickly disappears.
The general tendency of the ‘“‘anal” plate to keep to the right of the posterior
interradial area, though very strongly marked, does not appear ever to have attracted
attention; but it is nevertheless a fact of the very highest importance.
In the young of Promachocrinus, in which the five infrabasals are large and
equal in size, the ‘‘anal” appears to be formed before any of the radials, occu-
pying a position in the rhombic area between the corners of the basals and orals.
Soon afterward the radial appears, just to the right of and in line with it, between
the basal and oral of that side and to the right of the vertical line dividing the
basals and the orals. The radial grows much faster than the anal, which it grad-
ually surrounds, so that the latter comes to lie in a deep concavity in the side of
the radial to the right of it and to the right of the posterior interradius, well to
the right of the midline of the posterior basal. Later this right-hand radial
extends itself beneath the ‘“‘anal” and the concavity becomes straightened out
and disappears, the ‘‘anal” concurrently being shoved diagonally forward (toward
the left) and disappearing by resorption.
Mr. Frank Springer has shown that in the families Taxocrinide and Ichthyo-
crinidew and in the Inadunata there is an essentially similar variation in the posi-
tion of the radianal, which migrates from a primitive position directly under the
right posterior radial to an oblique position under the lower left-hand corner of
that radial, finally moving upward and becoming completely eliminated.
The position of the so-called ‘‘anal” in the larve of Promachocrinus, lying
within a concavity in the lower left-hand portion of the radial to the right of the
posterior interradius, and its migration upward and toward the left, leave no room
for doubt that the so-called anal of the pentacrinoid larve is nothing more nor
less than the radianal of the fossil forms.
Mr. Springer, as before stated, has shown that in the Flexibilia there is a very
pronounced tendency manifested by all the radial structures to turn toward the right;
the radianal originates under the right posterior radial; from this position it migrates
upward until it disappears, always to the right of the median line; if the arms
have an assymmetrical distortion it is toward the right, never toward the left; the
vertical series of plates arising from the anal 2 is affected by this tendency, which
persists long after the radianal has disappeared.
In the ontogeny of the comatulids the radianal follows the same course as
in a succession of fossil genera; the anal tube is always to the right of the median
line of the posterior interradius; that the supplementary arm arising on anal x
in the young of Thaumatocrinus renovatus and of Promachocrinus kerguelensis
does not turn to the right is to be interpreted purely as a secondary condition,
the result of its origin on the edge of the disk and its free extension outward from
the body. Were the series of ossicles following anal z in the young of Thauma-
tocrinus and Promachocrinus incorporated in the perisome we can not doubt but
that it. would have followed the anal tube in its migration to the right, and would-
therefore have come into complete correspondence with the conditions seen in the
fossil Flexibilia.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 333
Crinoids are fundamentally and primarily regularly pentamerous. In endo-
cyclic forms the movement of the posterior part of the digestive tube exerts a
constant or intermittent force the direction of which is upward and toward the
right (fig. 20, p. 69). This force, operating in the posterior interradius, tends to
keep separate the two posterior radials and to prevent the right posterior radial
from shipping downward and coming into contact along its proximal border with
the distal borders of the two subjacent basals.
Therefore there persists between the two posterior radials, long after its counter-
parts have disappeared from between the other radials, the primitive interradial,
now known as the anal; and there persists beneath the right posterior radial, long
after similar plates have disappeared from beneath all of the other radials, the
primitive subradial, now known as the radianal.
In the later fossil and in all the recent forms regular pentamerous symmetry
again occurs as the result of the progressive reduction of the calyx plates whereby
the visceral mass comes to be largely exposed and thereby able to accommodate
the constant motion of the digestive tube through temporary and transient move-
ments and changes in its perisomic covering..
In exocyclic forms movement of the posterior part of the digestive tube
(fig. 21, p. 69) operates to shove the marginal mouth to the right, with the effect
of making the originally left posterior a true posterior ray, different in character
from the other four. As the calyx plates have become metamorphosed into a
small flat platform before the commencement of the transition of the digestive tube
from the endocyclic to the exocyclic type no effect is produced upon them.
The subradial plates of the crinoids, of which the radianal, itself only appearing
in the very young of the recent forms, is the last remnant, are all that remain in the
crinoid organism of the ambulacral series of the urchins with the exception of the
radials, which represent the first ambulacrals formed, those situated about the
border of the peristome.
W. B. Carpenter says that in Antedon bifida for some little time after the
appearance of the arms the relation of the skeleton of the calyx to the visceral
mass it includes undergoes but little change, the chief difference consisting in the
more compact condition it now comes to present in consequence of the advanced
development of its component pieces. The five basals now possess a regularly
trapezoidal form, the lower part of each being an acute-angled triangle with its
apex pointing downward, and its upper part an obtuse-angled triangle with its apex
directed upward. The sides of the lower triangle are bordered by a somewhat
thickened edge of solid transparent calcareous substance, the presence of which
signifies that the plate has received its full increase in that direction. The adjacent
borders of these plates, however, do not come into actual contact, a thin lamina of
sarcode being interposed between them, and there is also a passage left at the
truncated apex of the inverted pyramid formed by their junction through which
the axial sarcodic cord of the stem is continued into the calyx. The upper margins
of the basals have no distinct border and seem to be still in process of growth. The
radials, with the radianal intercalated between two of them, now form a nearly
complete circle resting upon the basals and separating them entirely from the
334 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
orals. Their shape is somewhat quadrangular, two of their angles pointing ver-
tically upward and downward, the other two laterally toward each other. Their
lower angles are received between the upper angles of the basals, while on their
upper, which are somewhat truncated, the narrow first primibrachs are super-
imposed. Considerable spaces still exist between the adjacent radials, except
where the radianal is intercalated in the series, and these are filled only by sarcodic
substance. The central portion of these radials is thickened by the endogeneous
extension of the calcareous reticulation, and this extends toward its upper angle
so as to form a kind of articular surface for the support of the first primibrachs,
but it does not extend over the lateral or alar expansions of these plates, which still
retain their original condition of eribriform films. The first primibrachs differ
considerably from the radials in shape, being rather rods than plates, but they are
deeply grooved on their oral aspect, that part which is subsequently to become a
central canal being not yet closed in. The calcareous reticulation of their outer
or aboral surface is cribriform, but the ingrowth from which they derive their
solidity is produced by the development of fasciculated tissue analogous to that of
which the columnals are composed.. The same general description applies to the
second (axillary) primibrachs, which, like the first, are nearly cylindrical at their
proximal extremities, but expand toward their distal ends so that each presents
two articular surfaces on which are superimposed the pair of first brachials. The
orals, which alternate with the first primibrachs, though somewhat internal to
them, now present somewhat of a triangular form, their apices pointing upward;
their basal angles, however, are blunted by the encroachment of the radials. At
no part of their contour have these plates any definite margin lke that which
borders the two lower sides of the basals, but the calcareous reticulation of which
they are composed is continued into the layer of condensed sarcode with which
they are invested. Although the form of these plates is generally triangular, their
surface is neither a plane nor a spherical triangle, but presents a remarkable uneven-
ness. Near the apex of each there is a deep depression externally and a corre-
sponding projection internally, and the effect of this projection seems to be that
when the apices of these plates incline to one another so as to form a five-sided
pyramidal cover to the calyx, the plates will close together, not merely at their
apices and lateral margins, but also at the upper part of their internal surfaces.
There is also a broad depression near the base of each plate, so that its lower margin
is somewhat everted. The anal, which is intercalated between two of the radials,
has a tolerably regular circular shape, but it consists only of a single cribriform film
and has no definite border.
W. B. Carpenter states that the radianal “anal”’ is still distinguishable in speci-
mens of Antedon bifida that show no vestiges of the orals, but it has undergone no in-
crease in superficial dimensions and is so far from being augmented in thickness that
it seems rather to have been thinned by incipient resorption over its whole surface
preparatory to its complete disappearance a short time after. Carpenter did not
find that either the upper part of this plate disappears before the lower, or the lower
before the upper; and as he found no vestiges of it, though he carefully searched
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 835
for them, in young Antedons of about 2 inches in diameter, he concluded that
the entire plate is removed at once by a continuance of resorption over its whole
surface.
Interradials; Anal.
In the recent crinoids the secondarily perfected radial symmetry has become
so thoroughly established that the anal plate (corresponding to the anal z of the
fossil forms) is never in any way differentiated from the interradials occupying the
other interradial areas. All five of the interradials are either present and developed
to exactly the same degree, or all five are absent.
The so-called anal in the young of the comatulids, a large and important
element in the calyx of all the forms in which the young are known, is not in any
way homologous with the anal of fossil species, but represents the radianal, which
itself is the last remnant of five theoretical primitive subradial plates persisting
beneath the right posterior radial; these five primitive subradial plates are them-
selves the equivalent of the five entire ambulacral series of the urchins, except for
those plates immediately surrounding the peristomal area, which are represented by
the radials.
The anal z is the equivalent of the second interambulacral plate of the echinoid,
the plate immediately following the genital; anal « together with the series which
commonly follow it are the equivalent of the entire interambulacral series in the
urchins with the exception of the genital, which is represented by the basal upon
which anal z rests.
Since the radianal is represented in the pentacrinoids of the comatulids we
should expect also to find in the posterior interradius a second plate which we
could with a reasonable degree of probability identify as the representative of the
plate known as anal z; and such a plate actually occurs.
Sir Wyville Thomson in one or two cases observed in the developing young of
Antedon bifida at about the time of the appearance of the radianal a series of five
minute rounded plates developed interradially between the lower edges of the
orals and the upper edges of the basals. These plates therefore separate the radials
from each other all around the calyx. They are the equivalent of the five inter-
radials in the fossil species, and that in the posterior interradius is the homologue
of anal z.
In the young of Comactinia five interradials of equal size are found; they are
late in making their appearance, being first noticeable at about the time when the
IBr, are formed. They never grow to a large size, but remain as five rhombic
plates in the interradial angles, each about half as long as the basal beneath it.
Neither do they rest upon the basals as they do ‘in the young of Promachocrinus
and Thaumatocrinus, for the radials have come into lateral contact before their
appearance; they thus lie in the angle made by the cutting away of the distal
angles of the radials in such a way that a line connecting the bases of two adjacent
IBr, would pass approximately through their center.
In a single instance I found a pentacrinoid of this species in which there were
three interradials instead of the usual one in each interradial area, one between
the distal ends of the radials and two side by side just above it (fig. 412, p. 317).
336 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
The young of Comatilia have never been observed until after the loss of the
larval column and the disappearance from external view of the basals. At this
stage five large strong orals are present, surrounded by small irregular plates; just
above the apposed lateral edges of the radials in the interradial angles of the calyx
are five large rounded interradials of equal size which have not to any extent under-
gone resorption (figs. 528, 529, pl. 2). These probably have been developed in
their present position as in the case of those of Comactinia.
Ordinarily these plates never develop further, but soon become resorbed.
In two genera, however, Promachocrinus and Thaumatocrinus (figs. 113, 114, p. 181,
115-118, p. 183, and 505, p. 371), they rapidly increase in size and gradually take on
all the characters of the radials between which they are situated, at the same time
giving rise to series of plates which form arms in no way distinguishable from the
arms arising from the five true radials.
Anal z lies directly over the posterior basal, always to the left of the radianal
and always, if the radianal is present, maintaining a closer relation with the radial
to the left of the posterior interradial area than with that to the right, with which
the radianal is associated. Whereas the radianal is always a single plate, anal
commonly forms the base of a short series of more or less similar plates. The
characteristics of anal z in the fossil forms are naturally assumed by all the inter-
radials in the recent types in which interradials are present, for in the recent species
the anal interradial is in no way different from the other four.
The fact that the single linear series of simple plates arising from anal « in
many fossil crinoids appears as a complete post-radial series on the homologue of anal
az, and on all the other interradials in the recent forms, calls for a word of explanation.
In the fossil forms the outer border of anal z is far below the dividing line be-
tween the ventral surface of the disk and the lateral surface. This lateral perisome
is the surface in which anal z itself is formed; therefore, as new areas of perisome are
exposed beyond anal z, new plates similar to it will continually be formed, each
limited in its breadth by the necessity of providing for motion in the perisome on
either side of it, a necessity not operative in the case of anal z which connects two
radials and therefore forms the sixth link in the closed radial circlet.
In the recent Promachocrinus and Thauwmatocrinus the interradials are from
the very first equal in height to the radials, and the next two plates are equal in
height to the IBr, and IBr,, respectively.
In the crinoids the development of a plate after its formation depends not
so much upon its previous phylogenetical history as upon the relation which it
bears to the three zonal divisions of the skeleton forming dorsal surface, (1) the
coronal area, in which the coronal plates, the infrabasals and the basals, occur; (2)
the intermediate area in which the radials, division series and first two brachials are
formed; and (3) the dorsoventral border line, from which arise the free undivided
arms, these being made up in part of an extension from the second zone, and in part
of an extension from the ventral perisomic surface.
Thus the radianal of the fossil species, if developed within the basal ring, becomes
a true coronal plate in no way different from the other coronal plates; but in the recent
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 337
forms it is shoved outward beyond the radials into the primarily unplated portion
of the intermediate area, where it of necessity disappears.
Anal zx in the fossils develops between the two posterior radials, but probably
appears at a much later ontogenetical stage. It thus develops along exactly the
same lines as the radials, giving forth, like the latter, a linear series of ossicles which
collectively represent the division series; but, handicapped by its late ontogenetical
origin, it lags far behind the radials in development, so that the ossicles following
it never reach the dorsoventral border line, and it remains as a partially developed
radial, followed by a series of interambulacrals which may be regularly arranged,
but which are never segregated and fused into pairs as are the ambulacrals arising
from the radials.
The interradials of Promachocrinus and of Thaumatocrinus arise very early
in life and are from the first equal in height to the radials. They are probably in
these genera best interpreted as a sort of lateral budding from, or a delayed re-
duplication of, the radial to the left, and they are from the first equal in height to
the radials which they separate. As the radials move farther and farther apart
they continue to broaden, and their development in all ways is proportionate to
their breadth as compared with the breadth of the normal primary radials.
Developing within the radial circlet, which they entirely span dorsoventrally,
their growth is in every detail parallel to that of the radials themselves, the differ-
ence in development between the two being at all stages proportionate to the
difference in breadth.
The dorsoventral dimensions of the interradials are from the first equal to the
dorsoventral dimensions of the radials; therefore, as would be expected, the dorso-
ventral dimensions of the following ossicles are from the first equal to those of the
corresponding ossicles following the radials at the time of their formation. Deyvel-
oping under identical conditions, these plates develop in exactly the same way.
Reaching the border between the dorsal and ventral surface of the animal at exactly
the developmental stage at which this is reached by the ossicles arising from the
radials, thanks to the interradial sagging of this border line, the development of the
arms from the third brachial outward follows exactly the same lines as it does in
the arms of the primary radial series.
It occasionally happens in Thaumetocrinus (and probably also in Promachocrinus,
though no instance has as yet been reported in that genus) that interradials occur
from which no arms arise, but which exist as broad single plates interpolated in the
radial circlet. These probably represent interradials delayed in development so
that they did not reach the dorsoventral border line, and therefore could not give rise
to the equivalents of postradial series.
I have examined pentacrinoids of Promachocrinus kerguelensis in which both
the radianal and anal z are present, the former dwindling, the latter increasing in
size. They are situated side by side between the two posterior radials.
Except for the large infrabasals and the position of the radianal farther to the
right and within the lower left-hand corner of the right posterior radial, the very
young of Promachocrinus kerguelensis does not differ in any essential particular
from the very young Antedon. The increase in the number of arms is brought about
338 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
by the same curious process of twinning, through which one of the resultants arises
much later than the other, that we see illustrated everywhere throughout the
crinoid organism. At the time of the extrusion of the radianal from the radial cir-
clet a very narrow plate appears separating the two posterior radials. Almost
simultaneously four other similar plates appear separating the other radials in the
four other interradial areas. These plates are narrowly oblong, their longer sides
in contact with and equal in length to the lateral edges of the two radials which they
separate. All these interradials rapidly increase in width, and just beyond their
distal border two delicate plates appear as flat, more or less rhombic, calcareous
films, the smaller just beyond the larger. At this time the five primary postradial
series are fairly well developed,’ possessing numerous brachials beyond the IBr
axillary. These two filmy plates increase in size and gradually transform into
a [Br series from which two arms are given off; and these in every particular, except
size, resemble the IBr series and arms borne by the primary radials. It is not until
the animal is fully grown that the five interradial postradial series attain the size
of the five primary postradial series, and the five interradials assume all the characters
of true radials.
The interesting Thawmatocrinus renovatus (figs. 115-118, p. 183) is the young
of the species later described as Promachocrinus abyssorum (with which it was
found associated) just after the resorption of the radianal and the formation of all
of the interradials from which the five additional arms are commencing to grow.
The posterior interradial arm as seen in the so-called Thauwmatocrinus is the first to
form, and is consequently larger than the others; but from the size of this posterior
arm and the breadth of the interradials I suspect that smaller arms borne on the
other interradials have been lost, as these interradial arms when small are extremely
delicate. During growth the posterior interradial arm of Thawmatocrinus becomes
reduplicated on all the other interradial plates, and all of the five interradial arms
gradually increase to the size of the five primary arms (the extensive plating of the
disk at the same time disappearing by resorption) so that the 10-armed Promacho-
crinus abyssorum results.
Anal « in the fossil forms may be reduplicated in the form of a series of inter-
radials, one in each of the interradial areas, and therefore, bearing in mind the
greater perfection of the radial symmetry in the recent types, it does not surprise
us to see the same thing in the recent comatulids.
In some thirty 6-rayed specimens which I have studied the supernumerary ray
is in all cases but two inserted behind the left posterior—that is, between the two
posterior radials and receiving its ambulacra from the groove trunk to the left. It
is impossible to interpret this otherwise than as the persistance and subsequent
development of anal xz in types in which the interradials, including anal 2, are
normally resorbed immediately after formation, exactly as it is developed in Pro-
machocrinus and Thaumatocrinus. Additional weight is given this view by the
fact that Promachocrinus kerguelensis is very often 6-rayed, the additional ray
being in that case inserted behind the left posterior; only anal z has been formed,
the other interradials either having been entirely suppressed or having been, as in
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 339
5-rayed types, resorbed soon after their appearance instead of developing after the
manner normal for the genus.
In this connection it is most interesting to examine the figure published by
Mr. Frank Springer to show the probable primitive structure of the anal inter-
radius and adjacent parts of the calyx in the whole Flexibilia type, both fossil and
recent. If we should carry backward to its probable inception the course indi-
cated by the migration of the radianal plate in the young of the recent comatulids,
we should arrive at a calyx structure identical with that shown by Mr. Springer
and deduced from the study of the fossil forms. From the study of the recent types
alone it might be argued that the figure should be slightly modified by the redupli-
cation of anal x in the shape of interradials in all the other interradial areas; but
from the data acquired from the study of 6-rayed specimens, and the very evident
modification of all the recent types in the direction of a perfect, derived from an
imperfect, radial symmetry, it would seem that we would be justified in considering
these four additional interadials as a later development.
Sir Wyville Thomson believed that the minute interradials sometimes present
in the young of Antedon bifida occasionally persisted and became the clusters of
small plates often observed in the angles of the calyx in the adult; but it is far more
likely, as P. H. Carpenter has suggested, that these latter are secondary perisomic
plates, and that the true interradials whenever they appear are either resorbed
like the orals or develop into interradial radials.
Perisomic interradials.
In many of the recent comatulids more or less well-defined plates are found
between the division series and between the first two or three brachials of the free
arms. These may be comparatively small and distinct, or they may be large,
forming a solid calcareous plating over the perisome. They are most strongly
developed in certain of the large very many armed comasterids, as Comaster multi-
fida, C. belli, C. typica and Comanthina schlegelii, and, though here restricted to
small areas between the bases of the IBr,, are very prominent features of certain of
the species of Antedon, especially of A. moroccana and A. diibenii (fig. 104, p. 167).
These plates have nothing to do with true interradials of the type seen in the
young of Promachocrinus, Thaumatocrinus, Comactinia, Comatilia or Antedon, but
arise from a calcareous deposition within the more superficial layers of the peri-
some. These perisomic interradials will be considered in connection with the
other perisomic plates and the perisomic spicules, and in the section dealing with
the Pentacrinoid Larve.
Primary plates of the disk.
In the young of Thauwmatocrinus renovatus (figs. 115-118, p. 183) the surface of
the disk between the margin and the outer border of the orals is completely invested
by a pavement of small plates which later disappear, just as does the radianal.
The same development of a complete but transient plating of the disk occurs in the
young of Comactinia, the plates here being resorbed first on the ventral surface of
the disk, and later in the lateral interradial areas.
340 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
This heavy plating of the disk in the very young of species of which the adults
have naked disks must be of very profound significance and, when we consider it
in connection with the occurrence of the radianal and of anal z, we are naturally led
to the conclusion that it represents a structure once of the highest importance in
the economy of the animal, but long since ebsolete.
It is probably to be interpreted as the transient remnant of a solid calcareous
plating of the same type as that from which the solid vault of the Camerata was
developed.
Orals.
The orals, though present so far as known in the young of all the recent comat-
ulids—indeed in the early stages appearing simultaneously with the basals and of
equal importance—are always resorbed long before adult life is reached, no trace
of them whatever remaining.
The five orals are always of equal size (figs. 407-413, p. 317, 529, 530, pl. 2, 532,
533, pl. 3, 542-544, 547, 548, pl. 4, 559-564, pl. 6, and 576, pl. 9), no matter how
different the sizes of the several interradial areas may later become. Each is an
approximately triangular plate, lying with the apex of least divergence at the
peristome; the edge opposite this apex is more or less convex. In the oligo-
phreate species the orals appear commonly to be either a plane triangle, or a spher-
ical triangle of large radius (figs. 408, 411, 412, p. 317, and 548, pl. 4); but in the
macrophreate species, as first noticed by W. B. Carpenter, they are neither a plane
nor a spherical triangle, for the two edges along which each oral abuts upon its
neighbors are more or less everted and turned vertically, so that when the orals
are closed down they are in lateral apposition with the adjacent orals not by
their edges alone, but by the outer side of this everted rim (figs. 409, 410, p. 317.
535, pl. 3, 544, pl. 4, and 559, 561, 563, 564, pl. 6). This rim is highest at the
mouth, where the oral suddenly turns upward, and gradually diminishes in height
toward the periphery of the disk.
The orals make their appearance at the same time as the basals (with which
among the comatulids they are strictly correlated in development and metamor-
phosis, though morphologically they have nothing whatever to do with them) and
long before the radials are formed. Each oral is situated exactly over its corre-
sponding basal.
W. B. Carpenter observed that in Antedon bifida the resorption of the orals,
which commences before the termination of pentacrinoid life, is completed very
soon after the animal has entered upon its free existence. The resorption takes
place from the outer edge inward toward the center, the last traces of these plates
that can be distinguished being glistening fragments of calcareous network at the
bases of the five membranous valves which still fold over the tentacles forming the
oral ring in specimens which have attained a diameter of about an inch and a half,
which soon disappear entirely.
As the orals among the comatulids are essentially a larval structure, further
discussion of them is postponed to the section dealing with the Pentacrinoid young.
In the adults of certain species in which the disk is heavily plated, as in the
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 341
species of Calometride, five small orals are often found which are apparently the
same as the orals of the young.
These seem to be in reality, however, secondary perisomic orals, oral-like
perisomic plates developed in the apex of each interradial area exactly as the
covering plates are developed in the marginal lappets bordering the ambulacral
grooves, and to have no connection whatever with the true orals of the young.
The relation between the true orals and the secondary perisomic orals in these
forms appears to be the same as that between the true interradials of the young of
the comasterids or of the species of Antedon and the perisomic interradials of the
adults.
General proportions of calyx and its contents.
The calcareous investment of the echinoderms reduced to its simplest and
most primitive form, as explained in the section dealing with the skeleton in gen-
eral, was a diffuse spicular development in the body wall; fusion of these spicules,
governed by mechanical localization, gave rise to a ring of more or less definite
plates, five larger, midsomatic (interradial) in position, and five smaller, interso-
matic (radial) in position, about the anterior end of the digestive tube. There is a
possibility, amounting almost to a probability, that the plates of this cireumoral
ring are not morphologically related to the spicular skeleton of the rest of the
animal except in a very general way, but are plates inherited as such from the
prototype of the group.
This ring, whatever its ultimate origin, moved away from its primitive posi-
tion about the anterior part of the digestive tube, passing around to the posterior
part of the body, where it came to form a circlet of plates about the dorsal apex, a
second newly formed ring appearing in its original position; the path taken by each
plate of the original ring over the body wall was marked by a series of repetitions
of the plate which were continually formed at its proximal border as it moved
along.
The second ring underwent the same course of development as the first; it, too,
moved outward; and in the crinoids we find it, in the form of radials from which
long and complex post-radial series arise, superposed, through the gradual disap-
pearance of the trail of plates left by the first in its passage, directly upon the
original plates of the first, while a third ring has taken its place about the mouth.
As we understand it, the original calcareous covering of the body after the
true crinoid type was attained took the form of a more or less globular capsule
composed of: (1) a central plate or cenirale, usually lengthened out into a long
column by a process of continual reduplication, more rarely represented by scat-
tered perisomic plates and spicules in the apical area; (2) a cirelet of five inter-
somatic plates, the infrabasals, immediately surrounding the centrale or resting
upon the summit of the column, each of which serves as the base of a complex
series of ambulacral ossicles; (3) a circlet of five larger midsomatic plates just
beyond the infrabasals and alternating in position with them, the basals, each of
which serves as the base of a series of interambulacrals; each of these basals is
separated from its neighbors on either side by the first ambulacral plate following
842 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
an infrabasal; (4) a circlet of five still larger plates each situated exactly over an
infrabasal to which it is joined by a small plate intercalated in the basal ring,
separated from each other by the plates of the interambulacral series which follow
the basals; these, the radials, give rise on their distal border to the arms; (5) a
circlet of five large approximately triangular plates with their inner apices touch-
ing the peristomal area in the center of the disk, the orals.
The specialization and perfection of the crinoid type took the form of a gradual
reduction in the size and complexity of the calyx, correlated with and ultimately
the result of, a great increase in the length and weight of the arms. The plates
between the infrabasals and the radials first disappeared, soon followed by the
interambulacral series, which became reduced to a single plate situated between
the radials, this later becoming eliminated so that the radials came into contact
all around the calyx, forming a closed cirelet like that of the basals and infrabasals.
The posterior interradius, being of larger size than the other interradii on
account of the presence therein of the anal proboscis and of the posterior portion
of the digestive tube, was the last to be affected in the transformation from the
primitive more complex to the specialized simpler type of calyx, and we therefore
find a series of types in which only one interambulacral (interradial) plate is present
between the two posterior radials and only one subradial (the radianal) beneath
the right posterior radial. It is from this intermediate type that the young of the
recent forms, so far as we know them, inherit their characteristics.
The original calcareous covering of the body in the type from which the adults
of the recent forms inherit their characters was in the form of a globular capsule
composed of (1) a central plate, or centrale, usually reduplicated into a long column,
of which the topmost columnal is permanently attached to the apical portion of
the calyx; (2) a closed circlet of five small infrabasals; (3) a closed circlet of five
larger basals; (4) a closed circlet of radials, giving rise on their distal border to the
arms; (5) a circlet of five orals closing in the ventral pole.
We see this arrangement of the calyx plates in Marsupites (fig. 565, pl. 7);
but in this aberrant form all the plates have adopted the same size not because
they are primarily of equivalent dimensions, but on account of a large increase in
the volume of the calyx to form a float, necessitating a corresponding increase in
the size of the plates which cover it.
The essential differences between the paleozoic crinoids (including the Encri-
nid) and the later forms, stated on the basis of broad averages, are two in num-
ber: (1) the column in the former is of continuous growth and of indefinite length,
and is composed of undifferentiated and similar colummnals, while in the latter the
column typically, after attaining a definite number of columnals, abruptly ceases its
growth, the topmost columnal becoming very closely attached to the calyx and
increasing in size, forming a so-called proximale, which is joined to the calyx by a
close suture and to the columnal just below it by a suture slightly less close, a so-
called stem syzygy; this fundamental column structure among the later forms is
subject to a great variety of perplexing modifications, though it may always be
detected by close study; (2) the calices in the latter, which are very small, exhibit
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 343
a very much more perfect pentamerous symmetry, never possessing an anal or a
radianal.
In the young of comatulids before the formation of the centrodorsal we find
what is essentially a highly developed palsozoic type; the column is composed of
an indefinite number of similar columnals, and the anal area is differentiated from
the other interradial areas by the occurrence of a large radianal; furthermore, the
plates of the calyx are large and entirely enclose the visceral mass, while the arms
are very short.
The secondary bilateral symmetry of the Comasteride has nothing whatever
to do with the bilateral symmetry of palsozoic forms, but results from the enormous
development of the digestive tube, which has shoved the mouth first to a marginal
position and then to the right, so that it comes to lie between the bases of the anterior
and of the right anterior post-radial series (figs. 21, 25-28, p. 69; see p. 152). This
appears to have been very suddenly acquired, as it is by no means universal in the
family.
The course taken by the mouth across the disk in the developing young of
species of this family shows that this character has been acquired very recently.
Until a considerable size is reached the mouth is central, just as in the correspond-
ng young of Antedon. After the disappearance of the orals the mouth moves from
this central position to a position at the base of the anterior post-radial series,
and then laterally toward the right until it comes to rest on the margin of the disk
midway between the bases of the anterior and of the right anterior post-radial series.
Originally the species of the Comasteride possessed a disk resembling that of
Antedon, as many of the species still do, and as all of the others do until a consid-
erable size is reached.
The many-coiled type of digestive tube occurs only in such species of Coma-
Steride as are confined to shallow water and to more or less muddy bottoms; species
of the deeper and clearer water all possess the usual so-called endocyclic type of
disk. We thus naturally infer that the ingestion by the shallow-water forms and
by those inhabiting muddy bottoms of a large amount of inorganic material and
the use of a very large percentage of plants with highly developed skeletons as
food has caused, or perpetuated, a sudden development of the intestine.
In the pelagic crinoids, such as Marsupites (fig. 565, pl. 7) and Uintacrinus,
the calyx is able to maintain a close approximation to its primitive form, modified
only by an induced strengthening and bracing of the unions between the com-
ponent ossicles in types in which the arms are very long and heavy, thereby sub-
jecting the calyx to a considerable strain.
The arms of Marsupites are, so far as we are able to judge, short and light, so
that in this genus a calyx showing a close approach to the most primitive possible
form of the pentamerous type, upon which the later fossil and the recent crinoids
are constructed, isfound. In Uintacrinus, on the contrary, the arms are excessively
long and heavy, and the strain which these long and heavy arms exert upon the
ealyx is counterbalanced by a reduction in size of the calyx plates and by the
incorporation in the body wall of numerous brachials and pinnulars, so that the
mechanical stress is taken up by a network of small sutures running in every direc-
344 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
tion, binding the ossicles together far more tightly than the few large sutures of
Marsupites, yet admitting of at least as much flexibility of the body wall. The
difference between JJarsupites and Uintacrinus is found to be, when analyzed,
merely a difference in arm length; the structure of the arms in the two genera is
exactly the same; the result of the great length of the arms in Uintacrinus has
been to decrease the size of the calyx plates and to increase them in number by
the incorporation in the body wall of the proximal brachials and the basal seg-
ments of the earlier pinnules, the mechanical strain caused by the long arms being
thus counteracted.
There is a broad gap between the mechanical factors bearing upon the calyx
of pelagic crinoids and those influencing the shape of the calyx of attached forms.
The long and supple columns of such comparatively short-armed genera as Ily-
crinus (fig. 3, p. 62), Rhizocrinus, Hyocrinus, Proisocrinus (fig. 128, p. 199), Thalasso-
crinus (fig. 145, p. 209), and Ptilocrinus (fig. 144, p. 207) allow of a great amount of
swaying, so that no severe strain is ever brought to bear upon the sutures between
the rows of calyx plates. Motion induced by any object hitting the crown is taken
up by the articulations of more or less of the upper portion of the stem, and very
little stress is exerted on the sutures between the calyx plates. In the pentacrinites
the stem, though exceedingly long, is furnished throughout with cirri, by means of.
which the animal is attached. The result of this method of attachment is exactly
the same as if the stem were very short, for all the cirri which can reach a fixed
object cling to it, and only a small portion of the column reaches free above the
topmost of the clinging cirri. Thus the swaying of the pentacrinite crown, which
is very large, with very long arms, is nothing like so free as the swaying of the
crowns of the species without cirri; the resulting added stress on the calyx plates
has had the effect of reducing them in size and of modifying their arrangement, so
that they have come to form a compact patina supporting the visceral mass and
serving as an attachment for the arms. In the comatulids the attachment is by
very numerous cirri, all arising from a single plate which, mechanically, is an inte-
gral part of the calyx (figs. 87, p. 148, and 88, p. 145). This method of attach-
ment is almost as unyielding as that seen in Holopus, which possesses a stout,
thick, unjointed stalk (fig. 517, pl. 1); and we find, exactly as in Holopus, a maxi-
mum reduction of the calyx, the radials, as in Holopus, resting directly upon the
column, or what remains of and represents the column, the basals, as well as the
infrabasals, having been eliminated from the body wall altogether.
In the gradual evolution of the perfected crinoid type (fig. 74, p. 127) the cen-
trale was the first to become affected; fixation took place by this plate, which
increased in size, and became reduplicated by the continuous formation of similar
plates just within it, resulting in a series of columnars.
Next the infrabasals became reduced in size, at the same time moving inward
toward the center over the outer border of the centrale, now become the stem (as
a result of the mechanical necessity of affording a firm support to the heavy calca-
reous body wall resting upon the now rigid reduced centrale), and gradually reclining
to a horizontal position, until they became merely five quite functionless minute
plates capping the ends of the basals and entirely covered by the stem, as in
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 845
the pentacrinites (fig. 566, pl. 7), or entirely losing their identity and merging with
the topmost columnal, as in the comatulids and in various other forms.
This left the basals to form the floor and the lower part of the sides of the
calyx, as we see in such forms as Calamocrinus or Ptilocrinus. But now the basals
began to undergo the same change; they became reduced in size, and reclined to
a horizontal position, at the same time moving inward over the inner (now upper
or ventral) surface of the infrabasals toward the center. The basals of the penta-
crinites are at this stage, but those of the comatulids have gone still further, become
quite small and functionless, and been metamorphosed into the rosette, as already
explained, excepting only in the genus Atelecrinus, where, although there are no
undoubted infrabasals in the adult, the basals have transformed only to the stage
at which we find them in the pentacrinites.
The metamorphosis of the orals is exactly correlated with that of the basals;
but it is entirely confined to resorption, so that, as the basals become reduced and
transformed into the rosette, the orals gradually disappear.
In a few types, especially within the family Bourgueticrinide, the metamor-
phosis of the basals has followed somewhat different lines. Instead of gradually
leaning outward with the progressive development of the calyx, they have grad-
ually leaned inward, so that finally they have come into a position more or less
parallel with the dorsoventral axis of the animal, eventually fusing and forming a
small and solid ring-like, cylindrical, or truncated conical calcareous element, which
to all intents and purposes is simply a topmost columnal firmly attached to the
radials. During this change the basals may become much reduced in size or may
become very greatly elongated, so that each presents a maximum surface for
attachment to its fellows on either side. Various stages of this process are seen in
Democrinus (fig. 133, p. 203), Bythocrinus (fig. 131, p. 203), Monachocrinus (fig. 132,
p. 203) and Rhizocrinus, Bathycrinus, and Ilycrinus, while in Nawmachocrinus (fig. 130,
p. 203) it is shown in its most perfected form.
Finally the radials, both in the comatulids and in the pentacrinites, originally
lying in five planes each parallel to the dorsoventral axis, have gradually leaned
outward to a nearly or quite horizontal position, and have moved inward over the
inner (now upper or ventral) surface of the basals so that, properly speaking, they
form the floor of the calyx, and not the sides as formerly, their chief function being
to serve as the attachment for the arms, instead of as formerly (and at present in
such genera as Calamocrinus, Thalassocrinus (fig. 145, p. 209), Hyocrinus, Gephyro-
crinus, Ptilocrinus (fig. 144, p. 207), etc.), to protect the internal organs.
This change in the size and in the interrelationships of the primitive calyx
plates is to be accounted for solely by the gradual change in the mechanics of the
organisms. <A globular body covered with large equal plates, just in apposition
at their borders and without overlap, is well suited for a pelagic existence, and we
see it retained only in the pelagic species, where it is best shown, probably in an
exaggeration of the primitive condition, in the aberrant comatulid Marsupites
(fig. 565, pl. 7).
79146°—Bull. 82—15. 23
346 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
Fixation by the centrale results in a great strain being exerted, either by the
constant motion of the arms or by the motion caused by waves or by other organisms,
along the sutures between the centrale and the first circlet of plates, and between
the individual plates of that circlet. This is met in such genera as Holopus (figs.
514, 517, pl. 1) by a solid welding together of all the calyx plates, resulting in a
solid calcareous mass with no possibility of motion except in the tegmen or in the
arms. But most commonly the strain is relieved by a combination of two proc-
esses, the fixed base elongating into a column with many joints, giving flexibility,
and the plates of the lowest circlet sipping inward over the ventral (upper) surface
of the topmost columnal (the primitive centrale), so that they are supported by a
considerable portion of their outer surfaces instead of by their edges only, and
the weak vertical suture between the centrale and the plates of the lowest circlet
is eliminated. The horizontal sutures, by which the plates meet end to end while
lying parallel to the axis of the stem, are perfectly capable of supporting a reason-
able weight by a mere thickening of the adjacent plates, and thus are not altered.
This arrangement is satisfactory for a crinoid with comparatively short arms
on a semirigid column, but if the column becomes very rigid, or if the arms become
very long, it is evident that a great strain will be brought upon the sutures between
the plates of the lowest circlet (now horizontal or nearly so) and those of the circlet
just above; this is met by a change in the second circlet of plates by which they
become braced on the first, just as the first became braced on the topmost columnal,
and thus cease to form a part of the calyx wall. This has happened in the penta-
crinites. In the comatulids fixation is by means of very numerous cirri all arising
from a single ossicle, which act collectively as grappling hooks (figs. 306, 307, p. 265),
and is much more firm than in the case of the pentacrinites, the crowns of which
sway at the summit of a long, broadly spiral flexible stem. The comatulids, there-
fore, must solidify the calyx still further to meet the conditions of life under which
they live, and they have done this by reducing all the calyx plates to a horizontal
position and welding them solidly together by close suture or by synostosis.
Atelecrinus typically does not cling to foreign objects as do most of the coma-
tulids, but rests upon the ooze on a circular disk formed by the long, nearly straight
cirri. It is thus not subject to amy great calyx strain, and has retained its basals
in the condition in which we find them in the pentacrinites.
The purely mechanical origin of the reduction of the calyx plates must be con-
stantly borne in mind, as it may easily be seen that a comparatively small change
in habit may result in an enormous change in the form and in the proportions of
the calyx plates which is of but minor systematic significance. An excellent
example of this is seen in the genus Marsupites (fig. 565, pl. 7), which superficially
does not in any way resemble the recent comatulids, though in reality it is very
closely related to them.
With this reduction circlet by circlet of the calyx, it naturally follows that, as
can be seen in the young developing Antedon, the internal organs are progressively
extruded more and more from the calyx, until they come to lie on and to be
protected by, the lower segments of the postradial series (fig. 74, p. 127). The
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 347
supporting and protective functions originally exercised by the infrabasals; basals
and radials have, in the comatulids and in the pentacrinites, been assumed by the
postradial ossicles to and including the second brachial of the free undivided arm.
As the visceral mass has constantly increased in proportionate size, while the
basals have dwindled and become metamorphosed into the rosette, and the radials
have ceased their development and become small recumbent plates, it now projects
far outward on every side and has come to be supported upon the [Br series and the
first two brachials, which have assumed the lateral supporting and protective
functions originally and primarily characteristic of the basals, radials, and other
calyx plates (figs. 83, p. 136, 85, p. 139, 92, p. 151, 111, p. 177, 113, p. 181, 119,
p- 185, and 121, p. 189).
Thus the calyx of the comatulids is peculiar in being primarily made up of
three circlets of horizontal plates alternating in position and superposed one upon
the other, the uppermost circlet forming the floor upon which the visceral mass
rests, the calyx plates having entirely lost their original function of inclosing
and protecting the visceral mass, one circlet having disappeared or become quite
obsolete (the infrabasals), the next having been so metamorphosed as to per-
form the duties merely of an undivided horizontal septum within the original
calyx (the basals), and the outer (the radials) having been so reduced as to serve
practically no other purpose than as a base for the attachment of the arms (figs. 431,
432, p. 349).
In regard to the changing relations between the calyx plates and the visceral]
mass in the developing young of Antedon bifida, W. B. Carpenter says: ‘‘For
some little time after the appearance of the arms the relations of the skeleton of
the calyx to the visceral mass it includes undergoes but little change, the chief
difference consisting in the more compact condition it now comes to present in
consequence of the advanced development of its component pieces. The five
basals now possess a regularly trapezoidal form, the lower part of each being an
acute angled triangle with its apex pointing downward and its upper part an
obtuse angled triangle with its apex directed upward. The radials, with the
anal intercalated between two of them, now form a nearly complete circle resting
on the basals and separating them entirely from the orals. Their shape is some-
what quadrangular, two of their angles pointing vertically upward and downward,
the other two laterally toward each other. Their lower angles are received between
the upper angles of the basals. A very important change takes place in the rela-
tions of the several parts of the calyx and its contents which gives to the body of
the more advanced pentacrinoid a much closer resemblance to that of the adult
Antedon. Instead of being completely included within a calcareous casing, which not
only supports it below but can close over it above, the visceral mass which occupies
the cavity of the calyx, is henceforth to be merely supported by its skeleton, its
upper surface losing all protection except such as is afforded by the infolding of
the arms, and being extended into a disk of which the mouth only occupies the
center. This change is essentially connected with the increased development of
the intestinal tube which now forms a nearly complete circle around the stomach
348 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
and comes to possess a second (anal) orifice. The original basals have undergone
little, if any, increase, but the radials are now much larger and spread out so as to
extend to the base of the cup instead of forming its sides. This spreading out
results from the increase in their own breadth without a corresponding increase
in the diameter of the circle on which they rest, so that they are forced to extend
themselves obliquely instead of vertically. The anal plate, being attached not so
much to the adjacent plates as to the visceral mass, begins to be lifted out from
between them with the development of the anal funnel, and the space left by it is
partly filled up by the lateral extension of the two radials between which it was
previously interposed, but which do not as yet come into mutual contact. The
primibrachs also increase in all their dimensions, but particularly in breadth, and
they thus assist in supporting the visceral mass which, at the conclusion of this
stage, extends itself as far as the bifurcation of the arms. The most remarkable
change in the condition of the calcareous skeleton in this stage, however, con-
sists in the altered relative position of the orals; these do not partake of the enlarge-
ment so remarkably seen in the radials, nor do they become more separated from
each other. The circlet of orals continues to embrace the circle of oral tentacles the
diameter of which comes to bear a smaller and smaller proportion to that of the ven-
tral surface of the disk, as the size of the latter is augmented by the development of
the intestinal tube around the gastric cavity, and thus it comes to pass that the
circlet of oral plates detaches itself from the summits of the radials on which it was
previously superimposed, and is relatively carried inward by the great enlarge-
ment of the circle formed by the latter, the space between the two series being
now filled in only by the membranous perisome which is traversed by the five
radial canals that pass out from the oral ring between the oral valves to the bifura-
cation of the arms. During the later stages of pentacrinoid life the calyx is still
more opened out by the increased lateral as well as longitudinal development of
the radials, but the diameter of the disk augments in even larger proportion, so that
it extends nearly as far as the bifurcation of the arms. The oral circlet is thus sepa-
rated by a much wider interval from the periphery of the disk, and in this outer
ring the anal funnel is now a very conspicuous object, the anal plate which it bears
on its outer side being altogether lifted out from between the two radials which
it originally separated. Before the body of the pentacrinoid drops off its stem
an incipient resorption of the orals is discernable; this resorption commencing
along the margins of the apical portion so that these plates lose their triangular
form and become somewhat spear shaped.”’
RADIALS.
In the comatulids the radials compose the only cirelet of body plates per-
sisting as such to the adult stage (except in the genera Atelecrinus and Atopocrinus,
where there is also a circlet of unmetamorphosed basals), the infrabasals (when
present at all) having early become united with the centrodorsal, and the basals
at a later stage having moved inward and become completely metamorphosed into
the rosette, or possibly in some cases entirely resorbed (figs. 66-68, p. 93, and 431,
432, p. 349).
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 349
The five radials when united in their natural position form what is known as
the radial pentagon (figs. 11, 12, p. 65). Dorsally where it is joined to the
centrodorsal the surface of this radial pentagon as a whole is almost flat, though
the surface of each radial has a slight convexity resulting in usually shallow reéntrant
furrows along the lines of suture between theindividual radials (figs. 465-467, p.359).
The crinoid radial is not a calyx plate at all, but a true arm plate, corresponding
Fics. 431432.—431, THE CENTRODORSAL AND RADIALS OF A SPECIMEN OF PEROMETRA DIOMEDE® FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN; THE
ARTICULAR FACES OF THE RADIALS SHOW, WITHIN THE MUSCULAR FOSSA, SUPPLEMENTARY MUSCLE PLATES AND, JUST BELOW
THESE, LIGAMENT BOSSES. 432, LATERAL VIEW OF THE CENTRODORSAL AND RADIALS OF A SPECIMEN OF PONTIOMETRA ANDER-
SONI FROM SINGAPORE SHOWING, ON THE ARTICULAR FACES OF THE RADIALS, THE SUPPLEMENTARY LIGAMENT FOSS ON THE
OUTER PORTIONS OF THE TRANSVERSE RIDGE.
exactly to each and every axillary; it is the equivalent of the asteroid terminal, but,
as an entity, has no equivalent in the echinoids.
The basals, lying directly over the five primary nerve trunks, indicate the
five primitive divisions of the crinoid body; planes including the interbasal sutures
divide the crinoid into five morphologically equivalent sections. But the basals
alternate in position both with the infrabasals below and with the radials above
them.
350 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
The crinoid arms are, as will be later shown, primarily paired interradial
structures which have become joined along their radial edges, forming a radial
biserial appendage, the ossicles later slipping in between each other so that an
elongate uniserial appendage results. The original arms were therefore primarily
ten in number, and were probably homologous with the auricles of the urchins
including the ossicles of the dental pyramids, though turned outward from the
body of the animal instead of being wholly internal. Originally, before their
union into five, the arms probably bore no ventral ambulacral structures, and had
no function other than that of increasing the surface of the disk by increasing the
distance between the points of attachment.
Now there are definite indications that not only the arms but also the radials
were originally ten in number, two on the distal edge of each basal, and that each
of the interbasal radials as we now know them in the crinoids is composed of two
primitive radials, one from the distal border of each of the underlying basals.
The dorsal nerve cords arise as stout interradial processes lying exactly over
the nerves leading to the cirri in the monocyclic forms. These two sets of nerves
thus bear exactly the same relation to each other that the dorsal and ventral nerves
do which innervate the legs and wings of insects, and are probably to be considered
as in a way analogous to these. Within the basals each of these primary nerve cords
divides into two secondary nerve cords, each of which enters an adjacent radial;
at the distal border of the radials the two cords from the two adjacent basals fuse
and form a single cord which is continued into the arms. Thus the arms are
innervated by a radial nerve cord which is formed by the ultimate union of the
two halves of interradial primary nerve cords.
Each primary trunk within the radials, as also just after its division within the
basals, indicates its primarily interradial origin by a commissure which joins the
derivatives from the original nerve trunk (fig. 64, p. 89). Each of the great dorsal
nerves of the arms is made up of half of each of the two primary nerve trunks of the
basal on either side of and below the radial-at the base of the arms which have moved
together and have become fused into a single nerve.
We thus have each of the primary nerve cords dividing and sending out two
diverging branches (which happen to fuse with similar branches from the adjacent
primary cords in the recent forms) that are connected by two transverse cords, one
within the basals, the other within the radials. These transverse commissures I
consider to be strictly comparable to similar commissures in the ventral nervous
system of primitive molluscs, phyllopod crustaceans, nemerteans and Peripatus,
and to show conclusively that the five radiating units of which the nervous system
of a crinoid is made up are not the five radial nerves from the radials outward,
but the interradial primary cords and their branches and connectives as far as the
point of union in the radials; and from that point onward the axial cord of the arm
must be considered as being composed of two halves, each belonging to the ad-
jacent interradial nerve cord, and therefore as being in reality two halved inter-
radial nerves lying side by side in a radial position. The radial commissures (which
collectively form the so-called circular commissure) are therefore to be regarded as
oe
ee
or
—
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS.
Fic. 436.
Fig. 438. Fic. 439. Fig. 440.
Fig. 441.
Fie. 444. Fia. 445. Fig. 446.
Fics. 433-446.—433, DoRSAL FACE OF A RADIAL FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILLIPPINE ISLANDS
(AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 434, DORSAL FACE OF A RADIAL FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHIL-
IPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P.H. CARPENTER). 435, VENTRAL FACE OF A RADIAL FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVI-
VICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 436, VENTRAL FACE OF A RADIAL FROM A SPECI-
MEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 437, INNER FACE OF A RADIAL
FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER), 438, INNER FACE
OF A RADIAL FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P.H. CARPENTER). 439,
ARTICULAR FACE OF A RADIAL FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (APTER P. H.
CARPENTER). 440, ARTICULAR FACE OF A RADIAL FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE Is-
LANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 441, TWO UNITED RADIALS FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA SOLARIS VIEWED VENTRALLY
(AFTER P.H.CARPENTER). 442, TWO UNITED RADIALS FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA SOLARIS VIEWED FROM THE INTERIOR
ENTER). 443, TWO UNITED RADIALS FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA
444, A RADIAL FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA SOLARIS VIEWED
445, AN ISOLATED RADIAL FROM A SPECIMEN OF
446, AN ISOLATED RADIAL
OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON (AFTER P. H. Carp
SOLARIS VIEWED DORSALLY (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
FROM THE INTERIOR OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON (AFTER P, H. CARPENTER
COMATULA PECTINATA VIEWED (@) VENTRALLY AND (b) DORSALLY (AFTER P, H. CARPENTER).
FROM A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA PECTINATA VIEWED FROM THE INTERIOR OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
352 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
five entirely distinct connectives, in every way comparable to the five isolated intra-
basal commissures.
Indeed in Encrinus liliiformis (as worked out by Beyrich) the truth of this is
well brought out, for the diverging branches from the primary interradial nerve cord
do not meet, but remain always at a considerable distance from each other, so that
the five commissures connecting the branches are widely separated. Encrinus is
a genus of the paleozoic type with biserial arms, and therefore is much more primi-
tive (in its arm structure at least) than the recent uniserial types. Its brachial
nerve cords thus may be confidently assumed to be also more primitive, and to indi-
cate the course by which the nerves of the recent comatulids and of the pentacrinites
have attained their present complexity.
In Apiocrinus parkinsoni the course of the canals has been worked out, and it
is found that the derivatives from each of the primary interradial nerve trunks
always keep separate, running parallel through the IBr,, diverging in the IBr,
(axillary) which has no chiasma, and entering the arms, the two arms of each pair
being innervated from the adjacent interradial areas and entirely independent of
each other. A commissure connects the diverging branches of each primary inter-
radial nerve trunk within the radials, but there is no proximal (intrabasal) com-
missure.
The clue to this interpretation of the nervous system of the crinoids is furnished
by the axillaries; within each axillary we find a complicated chiasma (fig. 62, p- 89);
the entering nerve branches at once, the two derivatives emerging at the center of
the two distal articular faces; a commissure connects these two derivatives just
before they emerge; just beyond the division of the original nerve cord an oblique
commissure is given off to the transverse commissure, the two oblique commissures
crossing at their distal ends.
Close examination shows that the division within the axillary is exactly the
same as the division of the primary nerve cords within the basals and the radials.
The axillary is composed primarily of two fused ossicles, as is shown by the articu-
lations by which it is joined to the preceding and succeeding ossicles; the significance
of these will be fully explained later.
In Encrinus each of the two nerves which enter the axillary branches, the inner
derivative crossing over to the opposite side, and from each of the two distal faces
of the axillary two nerves are given off side by side, one of each of the pairs being
from the left hand and the other from the right hand large nerve which entered the
axillary. Thus in Enerinus the interradial nerves do not intermingle, but run side
by side, not fusing to produce a radial nerve cord, as is the case in the comatulids and
in the pentacrinites. Enerinus possesses the intraradial commissures, but not the
intrabasal; and it has no transverse commissures in the axillaries. But in the pen-
tacrinites there is an intrabasal commissure, and there is also a similar commissure
within the axillaries.
The chiasma within the axillaries of the pentacrinites and of the comatulids
therefore is a reduplication of the conditions seen in the primitive nerve cord; the
the small diagonal fibers represent the original branching of the two primitive nerves,
though as a result of the fusion of these two nerves into one they have become prac-
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 353
Fig. 448.
Fig. 447.
Fig. 449.
Fig. 450,
Fig. 451. Fig. 452.
Figs. 447-452.—447, DoRSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATELLA NIGRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS
448, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATELLA STELLIGERA (APTER P. H. CARPENTER). 449,
DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATELLA } JLATA FROM QUEENSLAND (AFTER P. H. Car-
PENTER). 450, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF NEOCOMATELLA ALATA FROM CUBA. 451, DORSAL
VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF NEMASTER INSOLITUS FROM THE LESSER ANTILLES. 452, DORSAL VIEW
OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF LEPTONEMASTER VENUSTUS FROM THE WEST COAST OF FLORIDA,
AC
354 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
tically functionless, and consequently greatly reduced; the transverse commissure
in the axillary is the representative apparently of the intrabasal commissure, the
commissure of both branches haying beecme superposed and merged into one.
Now we know that the axillary is a double ossicle, arismg from the fusion of
two ossicles interiorly with the result of forming the complicated chiasma; or, in
other words, the axillary represents a retarded phase in the transition from the bi-
serial to the uniserial type of arm. The exactly comparable structure, shown by
the nerve cords within the calyx, is just as evidently the result of the drawing apart
of the two derivatives from the primary interradial cord as the result of the fusion
of two ossicles exteriorly, an intermediate stage being seen in Encrinus.
Viewed in this light the nervous system of the crinoid is seen to be after all
quite similar to that of the other higher invertebrates, especially to that of the
arthropods, instead of being unique as has commonly been supposed.
In such fossil forms as have biserial arms it is to be remarked that at the arm
bases the brachials become uniserial; this is not to be interpreted as indicating
that the arms were originally uniserial, but quite otherwise; mechanical consider-
ations have forced the amalgamation of the two primitive radials into one, and simi-
larly have forced the uniserial arrangement of the first two, and partially of the
third and fourth, brachials. The first four brachials, as will be shown later, are
intermediate in their character between the radials proximal to and the brachials
succeeding them; thus their relationship to each in the biserial arms is especially
instructive.
Thus we have good evidence that the radials were primarily double ossicles
arranged in pairs, each pair superposed upon a single basal, just as the brachials
beyond them are primarily arranged in a double series, or else were primarily single
ossicles each superposed directly upon a single basal, each later dividing into two;
the five radials as we see them now resulted from the fusion of the primitive radials
into pairs exteriorly; that is, the two on each basal joined, not interiorly with each
other, but exteriorly with those on adjacent basals. :
We know of no erinoids in which the radials are ten in number arranged in
pairs over the five basals, each of the ten being the equivalent of half of a radial in
the forms in which the radials are five in number. Promachocrinus and Thau-
matocrinus have ten radials, but each of these ten is the equivalent of one of the
five radials in allied forms or of one of the hypothetical original pairs, being,
though developed later, a perfect twin of the one lying at the side of it.
Thus the dorsal portion of the ambulacral system of the crinoids (and of the
other echinoderms as well) is entirely a double system formed by the lateral union
exteriorly of ten interradial processes, though it supports ventrally single structures
arising from the prolongation along its ventral surface of various of the circular
circumoral systems.
A consideration of the mechanical conditions affecting the structure of the cri-
_noids shows at once why ten single radials superposed upon the five basals are
never found. The echinoderms are divided into three or five radial divisions
because of the fact that the divisions are by lines of weakness and therefore must
be of some uneven number, for if the number were even the animal would be sub-
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS, 3
or
oO
Fig. 453. Fig. 454.
Fie. 456.
Fie. 457. Fig. 458.
Figs. 453-458.—453, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF CoMATILIA IRIDOMETRIFORMIS FROM THE BAHAMA
IsLANDS. 454, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA PECTINATA FROM SINGAPORE. 4
DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA SOLARIS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 456, DORSAL VIEW
OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF COMATULA SOLARIS ( AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 457, DORSAL VIEW OF THE
RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF CoMACTINIA ECHINOPTERA FROM THE GuLr or Mexico. 458, DORSAL VIEW OF THE
RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF CoMACTINIA ECHINOPTERA FROM CUBA.
356 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
ject to a severe shearing strain along the divisions which would then pass directly
across it. In animals in which the radial divisions are marked by lines of strength,
as in the celenterates, their number is always even, for the reason that the con-
tinuation of these lines of strength across the entire animal give an added rigidity
which would be lost were these lines not continuous across the center. Now if the
basals were superposed directly upon the infrabasals and bore the radials, single
or paired, directly upon them, the entire animal would be divided from the stem
outward by five sutural lines separating five solid calcareous masses. Such an
arrangement would greatly weaken the animal; every time an arm were struck
there would be great danger of tearmg out an entire sector as far down as the top
of the stem. For this reason we find the radials alternating with the basals instead
of superposed directly upon them, and five instead of ten in number. The same
mechanical reason has induced the prolongation of the basals and infrabasals
into sharp angles between the bases of the succeeding plates, for a sharply zigzag
sutural line is not subject to the shearing strain to which a straight line of weak-
ness would be liable, and thus the extremely angular line marking the union of the
basals and the radials, or of the infrabasals and basals, is far stronger than a straight
line would be in the same situation.
Against this mechanical interpretation of the origin of zigzag arrangement of
the calyx plates in the crinoids it might be urged that in the echinoids, which are
more or less globular and rigid and therefore as a whole comparable to a crinoidal
calyx, all except the apical plates are arranged in columns. But the two cases are
not by any means the same. The ambulacral series of the echinoid are analogous
to the biserial crinoid arms, and the interambulacral series to the perisomic interra-
dial plates such as are well seen in certain comasterids in which, though of purely
fortuitous origin, and arising very late in life, through a segregation of the peri-
somic spicules into dense groups, their arrangement is strictly comparable to that
of the echinoid interambulacrals. Originally the echinoid was provided with
strong internal muscles and possessed a more or less flexible test, as we see in the
echinothurids to-day. This resulted in the retention of the columnar arrange-
ment of the plates and also induced a narrowing of the individual plates so that,
though they alternate in adjacent columns, the angles of the horizontal suture
lines are eliminated so far as possible. With the plates in vertical columns and
the plates in each column very narrow there is given a maximum of flexibility along
the axes at right angles to the longer diameter of the plates. With the deteriora-
tion of the muscles, though still retaining the columnar arrangement, the plates
became broader with much more prominent angles, approaching the hexagonal
in form; so that, in such forms as the cidarids, a very considerable rigidity is at-
tained, and in exactly the same way as in the crinoid calyx, the adjacent columns
of plates alternating with each other and joining by a very sharply angular line
resulting in a firm dove-tailing, just as the basals are joined to the radials, and the
plates of each column joining the plates above and below for a minimum length of
their edge while interlocking with the alternating plates for a maximum, just as the
cirelet of basals is interlocked between the circlet of underbasals and the circlet of
radials.
MONOGRAPH OF THE
EXISTING CRINOIDS. 35
Fig. 459.
Fig. 461. Fig. 462.
Figs. 459-464.—459, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF COMASTER FRUTICOSUS FROM THE PHILIPPINE
ISLANDS. 460, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE
ISLANDS (AFTER P.H.CARPENTER). 461, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA
FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 462, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN
OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS AFTER THE REMOVAL OF THE ROSETTE AND THE BASAL STAR (AFTER
P. H. CARPENTER). 463, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS PARVICIRRA FROM THE
PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P.H.CARPENTER). 464, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF COMANTHUS
PARVICIRRA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P, H. CARPENTER).
358 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
In all crinoids, but especially emphasized in such species as Arachnocrinus
bulbosus (fig. 595, pl. 16), a most extraordinary similarity and correspondence is
seen between the radials and the axillaries in the arms. An analysis of the chiasma
formed by the dorsal nerves in the axillaries shows that this is merely a redupli-
eation of the conditions occurring in and about the radials.
Axillaries are always followed, on each of the derivative arms, by two ossicles
which are the exact counterparts of the two ossicles immediately following the
radials.
The first of these ossicles is invariably attached to the axillary, and no normal
process ever takes place which results in separating them, though in arm redupli-
cation separation ordinarily occurs between the first and second.
Similarly, the first of the corresponding ossicles following the radial is invari-
ably attached to it, and never becomes separated from it, though the radial may
become separated from the basals or from the infrabasal below it by the intercala-
tion of a subradial plate, from the adjacent radials by the development of inter-
radials, and from the basals by the degeneration and metamorphosis of the latter.
The first segment of the free undivided arm in the crinoids is in reality the
axillary from which it takes its origin. In forms which do not possess division
series, as those belonging to the family Pentametrocrinide, the radial occupies
the place and performs, the functions of this axillary.
We, therefore, are led to assume that in reality the radial is morphologically
identical with the succeeding axillaries, an assumption which is strengthened by
the fact that radials are occasionally doubled—that is, to all intents and purposes
axillary themselves—giving rise to two similar postradial series just as do axilla-
ries. It was the occurrence of true axillary radials, reported from time to time
in various species, which first suggested the idea, subsequently shown to be
abundantly justified, that the two 10-rayed genera Promachocrinus and Thauma-
tocrinus were derived from the corresponding 5-rayed genera Cyclometra and
Pentametrocrinus by the formation of axillaries by each radial, these later becoming
divided into two by a process of twinning.
Axillaries arise through the incomplete fusion of two originally distinct seg-
ments. Since radials only differ from axillaries in bearing a single instead of a
double subsequent series of ossicles, we may safely infer that, like axillaries, their
relationships are with the ossicles following and not with those preceding.
This is shown to be the case in axillaries in species in which the arm division
is of the so-called extraneous type, as in Metacrinus, or in which the division
series are of four ossicles, as in such species as Comanthus bennetti; the axillary
may be joined to the preceding ossicle by synarthry (as in Antedon), by syzygy
(as in all the division series except the first in Comanthus bennetti), or by oblique
muscular articulation as in Metacrinus; and may occur on the outer of the two
ossicles of an interpolated division series (as in Antedon, and in all species in which
the division series are composed of two ossicles only), on the epizygal of the first
syzygial pair (as in all the division series except the first in Comanthus bennetti,
and in all division series consisting of four ossicles), or fortuitously in the distal
part of the arm (as in Metacrinus and in all species in which extraneous division
—
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 359
Fie. 465. Fia. 466,
Fic. 467. Fig, 468.
Fig. 470.
Fia. 469.
Fias. 465-470.—465, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF EUDIOCRINUS ORNATUS FROM THE ANDAMAN
ISLANDS. 466, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF EUDIOCRINUS ORNATUS FROM THE ANDAMAN
ISLANDS. 467, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF CATOPTOMETRA HARTLAUBI FROM SOU THWESTERN
Japan. 468, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF ZYGOMETRA COMATA FROM SINGAPORE. 469, DoR-
SAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF HIMEROMETRA MARTENSI FROM SINGAPORE. 470, DORSAL VIEW
OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF HETEROMETRA QUINDUPLICAVA FROM THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (AFTER P. H,
CARPENTER).
3860 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
?
occurs); but no matter what the relation of the axillary is to the preceding
ossicles, the relation to the succeeding ossicles is always the same, and, furthermore,
it is always the same as the relation of the radial to the next succeeding ossicle.
Since axillaries are clearly most intimately related to the succeeding ossicles
and show no relationship whatever with those immediately preceding, it is natural
to infer that the same interdependence holds in the case of the morphologically
strictly comparable radials; that is, that the radials are in reality arm plates, and
are not in any way to be regarded as calyx plates, in spite of their position as an
integral part of the covering of the body wall.
In certain crinoids, which have relatively enormous bodies and short arms, the
radial may be separated from the infrabasal beneath it by an extra plate, which
disappears in the later types, persisting in many beneath the right posterior radial
only. The so-called “anal” of the young Antedon is the last remnant of this plate,
shoved far out of its normal position.
The radial is the equivalent of the asteroid terminal; therefore these subradial
plates occupy precisely the same situation as the asteroid brachials, of which they
appear to be the direct representatives; but they are dropped in all of the more
specialized crinoids, including all of the recent forms, which thus show a reversion
to the more compact echinoid type of test, profoundly modified by the inclusion
in it, as a fundamental feature, of the radial, corresponding to the asteroid terminal,
but not corresponding as an entity to any echinoid plate.
The occurrence of subradials in the crinoids with large calices indicates the
very close connection between the radials and the brachials succeeding, strongly
suggesting that the radial is in reality an arm and not a calyx plate. Moreover,
were the radial a calyx or coronal plate homologous with the ocular of the urchin
(a view very commonly held), we certainly should not expect it ever separated
from the apical portion of the animal by subradials.
There are only two series of true calyx plates in the crinoids—the infrabasals
and the basals—corresponding to the oculars and to the genitals of the urchins.
The radials and all subsequent plates belong to the appendicular series and not to
the calyx series at all.
An appreciation of this fact, taken in connection with an appreciation of the
true interrelationships between the crinoids and the urchins, gives us a suggestion
as to the true phylogenetical significance of the radianal, anal x, and the interradials.
Anal x and the interradials rest directly upon the basals, and thus correspond
exactly to the interambulacrals in the urchins, which follow the genitals in the
same way.
Now the radials are double plates, the equivalent of two (or more) of the
ambulacrals of the urchins, and are separated from the infrabasals, the equivalent
of the oculars of the urchins, by the closed circlet formed by the basals.
The radianal is occasionally (though only very rarely) interpolated in the circlet
of basals, so that it forms a single plate separating two adjacent basals, and connect-
ing the radial with the infrabasal beneath it.
It is thus possible to regard the interradials and anal « as the basal ossicles
of the interambulacrals of the urchins, and the radianal (including the other sub-
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 361
Fia. 473. Fic. 474.
Fia. 475. Fie, 476
Figs. 471-476.—471, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF CRASPEDOMETRA ACUTICIRRA FROM THE ANDA-
MAN ISLANDS. 472, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF HETEROMETRA REYNAUDI FROM CEYLON,
473, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF AMPHIMETRA PHILIBERTI FROM THE ANDAMAN ISLANDS. 474,
DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF AMPHIMETRA ENSIFER FROM SINGAPORE. 475, DORSAL VIEW
OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF PONTIOMETRA ANDERSONI FROM SINGAPORE, 476, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL
PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF MARIAMETRA SUBCARINATA FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN.
79146°—Bull. 82—15 24
362 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
radials when present) as the first ambulacral of the urchins in the normal position
in contact with the infrabasal, which corresponds to the echinoid ocular.
The rearrangement of the apical plates of the crinoid and the contraction of
the coronal ring which of necessity followed the formation of a column has brought
the basals (genitals) into a closed ring, cutting off the infrabasals (oculars) from
contact with the radials (the first plates of the echinoidal ambulacral series) and
preventing the formation between the infrabasals and the radials of the subradials
(the representatives of all of the ambulacrals of the urchins except the first two).
In the case of species with a very large body, allowing of more or less sepa-
ration between the calyx plates, we find that an interradial series of plates, in
every way resembling the echinoid interradials, is formed above each basal (geni-
tal), while, excepting only in Cleiocrinus, the radial, instead of moving to a more
proximal position and occupying the gap between the basals as would naturally be
expected were the radial really the homologue of the ocular, remains in the usual
position, but becomes connected with the basal ring, much more rarely with the
infrabasal, beneath it by an additional plate.
In other words, both the basals and the infrabasals maintain their primitive
relationship to the apical area (in the crinoids covered by the column or by the
central plate) just as strictly as do the genitals and the oculars, and the slight
deviations from the most primitive condition are exactly comparable to the similar
deviations on the part of the genitals and oculars; but whenever opportunity offers
both the basals and the infrabasals immediately give rise to series of plates which
correspond to the interradials and to the ambulacrals following the genitals and
the oculars of the urchins.
It is comparatively rare among the crinoids to find interradials and subradials
developed all around the calyx; but they frequently occur in the posterior inter-
radius and beneath the right posterior ray, as it is in this region, where the digestive
tube terminates, that the phylogenetical specialization of the calyx asserts itself
last.
The determination of the radial as a double plate arising through the mor-
phological fusion of two primarily single plates at once raises the question of the
correctness of the supposition, commonly accepted, that the crinoid radials are
really the equivalent of the echinoid oculars, which are undoubtedly single plates,
In the echinoids we find at first a circlet of 10 plates, 5 larger alternating with
5 smaller, about the periproctal area; the larger are the genitals, and the smaller
are the oculars, the former being interradial and the latter radial (figs. 71, 72, p. 127).
From the smaller (the radial oculars) arise the double series of ambulacrals,
addition to which is invariably made just under their outer border.
The solid subspherical calcareous investment of the unattached echinoid
imposes no particular stress upon the circlet of 10 coronal plates until a consider-
able size is reached, when the weakening effect of the multiplicity of the test plates
must be, so for as possible, counteracted.
This is done by the elimination, one by one, in definite sequence, of the
smaller plates (oculars) from the coronal ring so that the perfected arrangement
comes to be, as seen, for instance, in the cidarids, five large interradial genitals
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS, 363
Fic. 478.
Fia. 477.
Fia. 479. Fia. 480.
Fig. 482.
Fas. 477-482.—477, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN or LAMPROMETRA PROTECTUS FROM CEYLON. 478,
DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF CYLLOMETRA DISCIFORMIS FROM tHE Kr ISLANDS (AFTER P. H.
CARPENTER). 479, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF TROPIOMETRA PICTA FROM RIO DE JANEIRO.
480, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SIX-RAYED SPECIMEN OF ‘TROPIOMETRA PICTA FROM RIO DE JANEIRO. 481,
DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF NEOMETRA MULTICOLOR FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN. 482, DORSAL
VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF ASTEROMETRA MACROPODA FROM SOUTHWESTERN JAPAN
364 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
surrounding the periproctal area with five small oculars situated between their
outer angles, this arrangement giving a maximum of rigidity.
Now the oculars of the echinoids are most intimately associated with the
series of ambulacrals, and the genitals are associated with the interambulacral
series. Therefore in any readjustment by which five of these plates came into
mutual contact, excluding the other five from contact with the periproctal area,
each of the 10 plates must maintain its original association with the series of plates
arising from it.
As the genitals are much larger than the oculars, such association can only
be maintained by the exclusion of the oculars from the original circlet, for the
exclusion of the larger genitals by the sudden growth of the oculars behind them
would mean the more or less serious constriction, or at least crowding, of the
series of ambulacrals.
In the crinoids we find indicated as a primitive condition for the class a closed
ring of five small infrabasals just beyond which is a second closed ring of five much
larger basals which alternate with them; the former are radial in position, the
latter interradial. Beyond the basals is a third ring, sometimes closed and some-
times partially or entirely open, of radials, alternating with the basals, and hence
in line with the infrabasals. These radials are each primarily double plates, and
moreover they belong morphologically with the series of brachials and are not
properly calyx plates at all; they do not always form a closed ring, for they may
have one or five interradials intercalated between them, and furthermore they may
be separated from the basals, or from the infrabasals below them, by one or more
subradials.
The mechanical conditions affecting the crinoid calyx are very different from
those affecting the echinoid test. The fixation by means of a stalk imposes a
very considerable strain upon the apical plates, which therefore are at once obliged
to adjust themselves to a position and mutual interrelationship of the maximum
rigidity.
In the echinoids the original circlet of plates about the periproct becomes
reduced from 10, 5 large alternating with 5 small, to 5 composed of the larger
only, the smaller becoming excluded and accommodated between the distal angles
of the larger.
The crinoid calyx commences with a circlet of five small plates, radial in
position, just beyond which is a cirelet of five larger plates, interradial in position;
all the plates of both circlets are usually in mutual apposition. It occasionally
happens, however, that the smaller plates are somewhat separated so that the
larger reach the summit of the column between them, and we find an apical sys-
tem composed of five large (interradial) and five small (radial) plates alternating,
exactly as in the echinoids, except that the larger plates are in contact beyond the
smaller ones.
The small plates of the first circlet in the erioids (infrabasals) are radial in
position, exactly as are the small plates (oculars) in the coronal system of the
echinoids, and in both classes the large plates (basals and genitals) are situated
in the interradii.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 365
Fig. 487.
Fig, 438. Fi@. 489.
Figs. 483-489.—483, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF PTILOMETRA MULLERI FROM AUSTRALIA (AFTER
P. H. CARPENTER). 484, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF STYLOMETRA SPINIFERA FROM CUBA.
485, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF STENOMETRA QUINQUECOSTATA FROM THE Ki ISLANDS (AFTER
P. H. CARPENTER). 486, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF STIREMETRA BREVIRADIA FROM THE
KErRMADEC ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 487, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A YOUNG SPECIMEN OF
STIREMETRA BREVIRADIA FROM THE KERMADEC ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 488, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL
PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF THALASSOMETRA VILLOSA FROM THE WESTERN ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, 489, DORSAL VIEW OF THE
RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF PARAMETRA ORION FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN.
366 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
The correspondence between the oculars of the urchins and the infrabasals of
the erinoids, and between the genitals of the urchins and the basals of the crinoids,
is thus seen to be remarkably close; in fact, the only difference between the two
circlets and their respective interrelationships is that in the urchins the larger
plates, interradially situated, exclude the smaller, radially situated, from the peri-
proct or apical area, while in the crinoids the larger are excluded by the smaller.
There thus appears to be good cause for believing that the infrabasals of the
crinoids are the equivalent of the oculars of the urchins, and that the basals of the
crinoids are the equivalent of the genitals of the urchins. This second hypothesis,
indeed, has been almost universally accepted.
The radials of the crinoids, usually considered the equivalent of the oculars of the
urchins, differ strikingly from them in (1) their indicated primarily double nature, (2)
their frequent separation from each other by interradial plates, (3) the fundamental
occurrence of plates between them and the apical portion of the animal (in addition
to the regularly present infrabasals), (4) in size, they being much larger than the
plates with which they alternate (the basals) instead of smaller, (5) in the absence
of plate formation under their distal border, (6) in their relation to the canals of the
water vascular system, which pass beyond them to the region of the infrabasals, and
in (7) their relation to the muscular and nervous systems. In all of these points
the oculars of the urchins correspond to the infrabasals of the crinoids in so far as
the relationships of the latter have been determined.
But the oculars of the urchins are always situated at the head of the series
of ambulacrals, while the infrabasals of the crinoids are in the later types always
widely separated from the radials, which form the bases of the so-called post-radial
series.
The division series and the first two brachials of the free undivided arm in the
crinoids, the so-called interpolated series, developed in an area of skeleton-forming
dorsal perisome left exposed by the excess of growth of the visceral mass over that
of the dorsal skeleton, or rather by the much more rapid contraction of the calyx
plates than of the visceral mass, whereby the arm bases (the third brachials of the
free undivided arms) have become widely separated from the calyx plates, are the
equivalents of the auricles, and of the plates of the dental pyramids, in part of the
urchins. They were originally derived from vertical and parallel series of plates
resembling those in the ambulacral fields of the urchins by a complicated system of
segregation and fusion. The radial, being primarily double and forming the base
of this series, corresponds to the first two ambulacrals in the urchin to be formed,
that is, to the two ambulacrals situated on the border of the peristome, while the
subradial corresponds to all the ambulacrals of the urchin between the two situated
on the border of the peristome and the ocular.
This arrangement was perfected so long ago in the phylogeny of the crinoids
that we get but a slight hint of it even in the earliest fossils, while in the develop-
ment of Antedon the interpolated series appear as a branching linear series of ossicles
with no suggestion of the interpolated nature of their ultimate origin.
Apparently something occurred to stop suddenly the further development of
the ambulacrals in the crinoids, and the ambulacrals already formed, not being able
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS, 367
Fia. 490.
Fig. 491.
Fig. 493.
Fig, 492.
Fia. 494. Fig. 495.
Fies. 490-495.—490, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF PACHYLOMETRA ANGUSTICALYX FROM THE
MEANGIS ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 491, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF PACHYLO-
METRA INZZQUALIS FROM THE SOUTHWESTERN PACIFIC (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 492, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTA-
GON OF A SPECIMEN OF CRINOMETRA CONCINNA FROM CUBA. 493, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF
PCCILOMETRA ACELA FROM THE MEANGIS ISLANDS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 494, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON
OF A SPECIMEN OF CHARITOMETRA INCISA FROM THE SOUTHWESTERN PAciIFIcC (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 495, DORSAL
VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF CHARITOMETRA BASICURVA FROM THE KERMADEC ISLANDS (AFTER P. H.
CARPENTER).
368 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
to increase in number as they do indefinitely in the urchins, shifted about and
fused in such a way as to meet all the necessary mechanical requirements without
increase in number.
Increase in the number of the arms in the crinoids, at least in the pentacrinites
and comatulids, is accomplished by a curiously indirect and wasteful method. The
original arms break off, typically between the first two brachials, and additional
division series are formed, the last giving rise to new arms which are the exact equiva-
lents to the arms cast off. This curious interpolation of division series between the
base of the original arms and the base of the adult arms is the only remaining vestige
of the method by which the division series were originally formed.
In the crinoids the development of ambulacrals comparable to those in the
echinoids ceased abruptly, while the development of true ambulacrals (brachials)
beyond them was carried to an extreme. In the urchins the “ambulacrals” have
developed to such an extent that they encompass the entire lateral surface of the
animal except for a small area about the mouth, while only the first beginnings of
true ambulacrals are found, in the shape of 10 more or less developed processes
within the body cavity about the peristomic area.
If we imagined an urchin in which the skeleton formation had been suddenly
arrested so that the peristome was expanded as far as the ambitus, and in which
the auricles had become turned outward and extraordinarily developed through
the consumption of the energy which normally would have been used in the de-
velopment of ambulacrals, we should have a creature which, in so far as the skeleton
is concerned, would be a crinoid. We should merely have to move the anus to the
perisomic ventral surface, develop the suranal plate into a column, change the
teeth from their highly specialized form into generalized oral plates lying in the
integument, segregate the ambulacrals and bring the enormously enlarged auricles
into lateral contact, carrying out the ambulacral structures upon their ventral
surface, to make our crinoid perfect.
It is to the development of the column and its mechanical effects on the animal
that attention must chiefly be directed. The development of a column from the
suranal plate would first of all cause the coronal ring of plates to contract, so that the
animal would rest with the column supporting the plates of the coronal ring instead
of pushing upon the internal organs. In this contraction of the coronal ring five
of the plates would form one cirelet, and five another circlet, the plates of the latter
alternating with those of the former. In the echinoids there is a gradual enlarge-
ment of the coronal ring; at the same time the plates composing it gradually enlarge
so that the ultimate arrangement becomes five large genitals immediately sur-
rounding the periproct with five small oculars between their distal corners. This is
the result not of any change in the relative position of the plates but of their pro-
portionate growth inward by accretion along their free edges over the periproctal
area. The large genital plates naturally grow faster than the small ocular plates
and eventually come into contact behind them, excluding them entirely from the
periproct (figs. 71,73, p. 127), but without in the slightest degree altering the inter-
relationships of the original calcareous ossicles. If a contraction in the coronal
ring of five large and five small plates, such as would become necessary upon the
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 369
Fie. 497.
Fig. 499.
Fie. 501.
Fie. 500.
Fie. 502.
DA (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF ANTEDON BIFI
Port JACKSON, NEW SOUTH
PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF CoMPSOMETRA LOVENI FROM
WALES. 498, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF THYSANOMETRA TENELLOIDES FROM SOUTHERN
JAPAN. 499, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PE TAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF CoccoOMETRA HAGENI FROM Fioripa. 500, DORSAL
VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF LEPTOMETRA CELTICA (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 501, DORSAL VIEW
OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF LEPTOMETRA CELTICA (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 502, DORSAL VIEW OF THE
RADIAL PENTAGON (FROM WHICH THE ROS LOST) OF A SPECIMEN OF PSATHYROMETRA FRAGILIS FROM
NORTHERN JAPAN.
Figs. 496-502.—496, DORSAL VIEW
497, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL
ETTE HAS BE
370 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
formation of a column, should occur, conditions would be quite different. Assuming
that all the plates abut by their inner borders upon the periproctal area, it is evident
that the greatest width of the large plates is beyond the distal border of the small
plates. Thus a contraction of the circlet would gradually force the small plates be-
tween them inward so that the large plates would come into mutual contact beyond
them, forming a closed circlet with the closed circlet of small plates within it.
A circlet of large plates in mutual contact with a similar circlet of small plates
within it is what we find in the crinoids in the circlet of basals enclosing the circlet
of infrabasals.
But if the larger plates, interradially situated, came into contact with each
other beyond the small plates, radially situated, the latter would be entirely cut
off from the series of ambulacrals of which they formed the base. These would
therefore cease further growth and increase in numbers.
Precisely this has happened in the crinoids; the development of the ambula-
crals comparable to those of the echinoid abruptly ceased in the phylogenetically
far distant past.
Therefore the true homologies of the apical systems of the urchins and of the
crinoids seem to be that the large genitals of the former are the equivalent of the
large basals of the latter, and the small oculars of the former are the equivalent of
the small infrabasals of the latter. The oculars are extruded from the original
circlet of 10 alternating large and small plates by a simple process of growth; the
infrabasals have moved inward from this circlet as a result of a contraction which
became necessary in order to meet the mechanical exigencies arising from the
development of a column.
The individual radials in the comatulids are in close lateral apposition, usually
for nearly or quite their entire lateral length, so that the articular faces of adjacent
radials from the transverse ridge onward are barely separated from each other by a
narrow more or less shallow groove (figs. 431, p. 349, 441,p. 351). This groove
between the articular faces as a rule is broader and deeper in the Macrophreata
than in the Oligophreata (reaching its maximum in the family Pentametrocrinidz) ;
in the young of certain macrophreate forms the radials may be entirely, and in the
young of certain oligophreate forms partially, separated by intercalated interradials.
In the smaller species of the Oligophreata the conditions resemble those found in
the Macrophreata; but usually in this group the interradial groove is reduced to a
minimum, both of width and depth. There are, however, some curious exceptions;
in the genus Pontiometra (fig. 432, p. 349) the radial faces are widely separated,
while in the Calometride and in Comatilia not only are the radial faces widely
separated, but the radials extend upward in the angles of the calyx, entirely and
more or less widely separating the bases of the first primibrachs, in several species
of the former and in the only known species of the latter terminating in broad
spatulate processes, each of these processes being composed of the anterior interra-
dial extensions of two adjacent radials.
The dorsolateral edges of each radial are not sharp, but are more or less rounded
off, so that on the dorsal surface of the radial pentagon there are evident five more
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS.
371
Fia. 505.
Fia. 507.
Fis. 503-508.—503, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF PEROMETRA DIOMEDE® FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN.
504, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF ERYTHROMETRA RUBER FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN.
505, DORSAL
VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF PROMACHOCRINUS K
RGUELENSIS FROM KERGUELEN ISLAND (AFTER
P.H. CARPENTER). 506, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF SOLANOMETRA ANTARCTICA FROM THE
ANTARCTIC (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER). 507, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL P
CIALIS (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
FROM ALASKA.
=NTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF HELIOMETRA GLA-
508, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF FLOROMETRA ASPERRIMA
372 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
or less prominent furrows, each lying over one of the sutural lines which mark the
limits of the individual radials (figs. 466, 468, p. 359).
P. H. Carpenter noted that on the dorsal surface of the radial pentagon in
Antedon and in Leptometra the sides of these interradial furrows are simple and
straight; but in many of the other genera, including most of the Oligophreata and
many of the Macrophreata, that portion of the dorsal surface of each radial which
is next to its truncated lateral edge is raised into a sort of curved ridge or fold, so
that in the natural condition of mutual apposition of the five radials the dorsal
interradial furrows become somewhat lancet shaped (figs. 454, 457, 458, p. 355).
They correspond with the interradial grooves on the ventral surface of the sub-
jacent centrodorsal (figs. 236, 241, 242, p. 249), and in the cavity formed by the
apposition of the edges of these grooves lie the five rays of the basal star (figs. 416-
427,p.321). These interradial furrows on the dorsal surface of the radial pentagon,
like the interradial grooves on the ventral surface of the centrodorsal, are entirely
devoid of pigment, so that they commonly stand out sharply as five white leaflets
on a more or less yellow, reddish, dark brownish or purplish background.
Each individual radial has the form of a somewhat irregular truncated pyramid
(figs. 433-446, p. 351). The dorsal surface is usually almost entirely or quite con-
cealed by the centrodorsal (figs. 431, 432, p. 349); it is nearly triangular in outline
(figs. 483-434, p. 351), the apex being inward, deviating from a true triangle in having
the outer side somewhat convex and the opposite apex more or less truncated. In
contour it may be nearly flat, but there is usually an approach to the form taken by
the surface of a cone; there is no curvature along the radial axis, but the tangential
planes parallel to the dorsoventral axis of the animal show from the outer edge of
the radial inward a convexity the radius of curvature of which becomes gradually
shorter as one nears the center of the animal, or the inner end of the radial. This
curvature is strongest in the interradial angles, decreasing toward the midradial
axis, often so rapidly that nearly the entire dorsal surface is practically flat. If a
part of the dorsal surface project beyond the rim of the centrodorsal, this external
portion commonly makes in the midradial axis an obtuse angle with the concealed
portion, and this angle occasionally approaches so near to 90° that in an external
view the radials appear to be standing vertically.
The lateral faces by which the radials are in mutual contact are flat (figs. 437,
438, 442, 444, 446, p. 351, and 549, 551, 552, 554, 557, pl. 5), and approximate in
shape a right-angled triangle with a concave hypothnuse. The inner edge, forming
the boundary between the lateral and inner faces, is typically perpendicular to the
plane of the radial pentagon, but it is often more or less obscured by the develop-
ment of the central plug, to be later described; the lower edge, between the lateral
and the dorsal surfaces, is usually cut away to accommodate the basal rays; the
outer edge is concave as a result of the sculpture incident to the development of the
articular facet.
The inner ends of the radials are oblong in general outline, and of very vari-
able height (figs. 437, 488, 442, 444, 446, p. 351, and 549, 551, 557, pl. 5); the upper
edge is usually concave or more or less deeply incised or notched; the general sur-
face is usually much obscured by the deposit of intercalicular calcareous rods and
lamina which, when abundant, form the so-called central plug (fig. 11, p. 65).
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. oie
The ventral or inner faces slope inward, forming collectively a funnel-shaped
space occupying the center of the radial pentagon (fig. 442, p. 351). These faces
are usually more or less divided up by delicate calcareous processes which extend
Fig. 509. Fig, 510.
Fig. 511.
Fig. 513.
Figs. 509-513.—509, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF HATHROMETRA DENTATA FROM SOUTHERN
MASSACHUSETTS. 510, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF THAUMATOMETRA TENUIS FROM THE
511, DORSAL VIEW OF THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF
H. CARPENTER). 512, DORSAL VIEW OF
513, DORSAL VIEW OF
SEA OF JAPAN; THE ROSETTE HAS BEEN BROKEN AWAY.
HELIOMETRA GLACIALIS AFTER THE REMOVAL OF THE ROSETTE (AFTER P.
THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF PENTAMETROCRINUS SEMPERI (AFTER P. H. CARPENTER).
THE RADIAL PENTAGON OF A SPECIMEN OF PENTAMETROCRINUS JAPONICUS FROM SOUTHERN JAPAN.
to meet the ventral face of the rosette, and collectively form a complicated net-
work, filling up the central funnel and often partially bridging over the ventral
radial furrow so as to convert it into an incomplete canal. In many forms these
374 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
caleareous processes are so developed as to form a spongy calcareous mass entirely
filling the funnel-shaped cavity of the radial pentagon, resulting in the formation
of a comparatively dense central plug (fig. 11, p. 65).
Unless the central plug is so fully developed as entirely to obscure the internal
and ventral faces of the radials, the funnel-shaped interior of the radial pentagon
is seen to be marked with five furrows, interradial in position, which lie in the
interradial sutures (fig. 441, p. 351); between them, in the midradial line, there
are usually five broader and shallower furrows, which run to the intermuscular notch
(figs. 435 and 445a, p. 351), and often through it, traversing the joint face nearly to
the central canal. They are extended outward in a similar position over the skele-
ton of the rays and arms. These are known as intermuscular midradial furrows. In
some species they are represented by low broad ridges, or merely by a greater density
of the calcareous structure; often they are not present at all, the midradial portion
of the radials not being different from the lateral portions. The midradial furrows,
when developed, serve to lodge the proximal portion of the cceliac canals. They
are well shown in Tropiometra picta, Cyllometra manca and in Nemaster lineata.
At the inner margin of the ventral face the midradial furrow turns downward
and passes (when developed) directly into a nearly vertical furrow, occupying the
median axial line of the proximal or internal face, and becomes more or less com-
pletely converted into a canal by the union of irregular processes (forming part
of the outer portion of the central plug), which extend themselves from the side
to meet the spoutlike processes of the rosette. As it descends toward the dorsal
face and passes between the inner raised edges of the two apertures of the central
canal (lodging the secondary basal cords of the dorsal nervous system), this axial
radial furrow becomes a complete canal, for its edges are closely applied to the
inflected margins of one of the five radial spoutlike processes of the rosette.
These axial canals are therefore the proximal ends of the five celiac canals
of the arms and their extensions into the pinnules, and they thus inclose portions
of the body cavity which Carpenter called the radial ewlom. As a general rule
they become closed up by calcareous tissue and do not reach the dorsal surface
of the radial pentagon, which presents no real openings except the central one
occupied by the rosette; but they sometimes open on the dorsal surface of the
radial pentagon, as in Antedon, Stenometra and Cyllometra, by five large holes
that correspond with five more or less distinctly marked circular depressions placed
interradially on the ventral surface of the centrodorsal around the margin of its
central cavity, and the canals end blindly in these depressions. In Antedon these
depressions are usually shallow pits of considerable size, but they are variable in
their development, and are sometimes, though rarely, absent altogether. This
condition, in which there are no radial depressions on the ventral surface of the
centrodorsal, is the normal one in Leptometra. Here, as described by Carpenter,
the margin of the central opening is usually almost circular (fig. 287, p. 262), though
sometimes bluntly stellate as in Antedon (figs. 280, 281, 283, p. 261); at the same time
the five openings on the dorsal surface of the radial pentagon are but little devel-
oped or even entirely absent. The absence or slight development of these open-
ings in Leptometra is considered by Carpenter to be principally due to the fact
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 375
that the inner margin of the dorsal surface of the radials is not notched, but straight,
the radial axial furrow not being continued so far toward the dorsal surface as in
Antedon; and also that process grows inward from the two sides of the dorsal
end of each of the five spoutlike rays of the rosette, so that the lumen of the canal
it encloses becomes much diminished; while in some eases similar processes are
put forward from the margin of the radial, which unite with the others so com-
pletely as entirely to obliterate the lumen of the radial axial canal, and thus form
its dorsal boundary.
Pits similar to those of Antedon are seen in the species of Cyllometra; but
among recent comatulids the most striking development in this respect is seen
in such species as Heterometra quinduplicava, H. reynaudii, Himerometra mar-
tensi, Craspedometra acuticirra, and in many other of the multibrachiate oligo-
phreate forms, as well as in certain large species of Florometra, where the radial
axial canals which pass over from the ventral to the inner faces of the radials turn
outward again at the bottom of the calyx, and expand into relatively large bilobate
or rounded triangular cavities which are formed by excavation in the apposed
surfaces of the radials and the centrodorsal respectively (figs. 252-255, p. 253,
256-261, p. 255, and 297, p. 263).
In Asterometra these appear as actual perforations on the ventral surface of
the centrodorsal, which reach downward to the bottom of its central cavity as in
several fossil species, being only separated from the central cavity by a narrow
septum (fig. 268, p. 259). In other species, such as Psathyrometra fragilis, the same
condition obtains, but the septum is absent, so that the central cavity, which is
naturally decagonal or pentagonal in shape, becomes more or less markedly stellate.
Where these canals are enclosed by the spoutlike processes of the rosette they
are completely shut off, both from one another and from the dorsal extension of
the ceelom, which occupies the central funnel-shaped space within the radial pentagon,
and passes down into the cavity of the centrodorsal through the central opening
of the rosette. On the ventral side of the rosette, however, these radial axial
canals are only partially complete, and are in free communication with the numer-
ous plexiform spaces into which the funnel-shaped space is broken up by the above-
mentined calcareous network. The central portion of this system is very irregular;
but peripherally the plexus becomes more regular, and five axial interradial canals,
lying in the axial interradial furrows formed by the truncation of the ventrolateral
angles of each basal, which, like the axial radial furrows, are partially bridged over
by the inosculating calcareous processes which extend themselyes toward the
ventral aspect of the rosette, are traceable between the five radial ones with which,
as with the center of the plexus, they are in free communication. These inter-
radial canals are continuous with the interradial furrows which are visible on the
ventral aspect of the radial pentagon, and they inclose diverticula of the cireum-
visceral ceelom to which the name interradial cewlom has been given. They do
not descend so far toward the dorsal surface as the axial radial canals, and are
not, like the latter, enclosed (normally at any rate) by spoutlike processes of the
rosette, for their course toward the dorsal surface is terminated by the five short
376 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
triangular processes of the rosette which are directed toward the sutures between
the five radials.
The external faces of the radials bear complicated articular facets (figs. 9, 10,
p- 65, 431, 432, p. 349, and 439, 440, p. 351) to which are joined the proximal ends
of the first primibrachs, the first ossicles of the postradial series. These articular
facets may incline at an angle of 45° to the dorsoventral axis of the animal, and
to the ventral surface of the centrodorsal, and thus be trapezoidal in shape, or
even nearly triangular, or they may be parallel to the former, making an angle
of 90° with the latter, and thus be practically oblong. In most cases an inter-
mediate condition is found, and the general statement may be made that the
Macrophreata tend to approach the former extreme, the Oligophreata, especially
the more highly specialized species, the latter.
The articular facets are divided into one unpaired and four paired fosse (figs.
9, 10, p. 65), ina single genus Pontiometra (fig. 432, p. 349), a third additional pair
of fosse being added, making a total of six. The dorsal portion is occupied by the
large dorsal ligament fossa lodging the dorsal ligament, the function of which is to
antagonize the muscles; this extends as far as the transverse ridge, which stretches
transversely across the joint face and serves as the fulerum upon which the motion
at the articulation is accommodated; just beyond the transverse ridge, one on
either side of the central canal lodging the dorsal nerve cords, lie the more or less
triangular interarticular ligament fosse, and beyond these, separated interiorly
either by a septum or a groove which reaches almost or quite to the central canal,
the muscular fosse, typically large and distally rounded, though often more or
less reduced and sometimes narrowly crescentic or linear; they appear to be entirely
absent in the genus Pontiometra.
The articular facet of the radials represents what is known as the straight
muscular articulation, the type of articulation from which all the brachial unions
are derived, as will be later explained.
The distal borders of the muscular fosse form the rim of the funnels
central cavity of the radial pentagon, which extends downward to the rosette.
In the Macrophreata this cavity is usually comparatively small, but free from
calcareous deposit, while in the Oligophreata it is commonly much more extensive,
though more or less, often entirely, filled up by a loose deposit of caleareous matter
forming the central plug previously described upon which the visceral.mass rests.
P. H. Carpenter noticed important differences in the composition of the radial
articular facets in such species as he was able to dissect, but he did not consider
them as offering available criteria for systematic work. From a somewhat more
extended study I have been led to the conclusion that the characters presented
by the articular facets, and repeated with progressively diminishing individuality
at all the muscular articulations throughout the postradial series, are of the highest
possible value in the delimitation of genera and higher groups, though scarcely
plastic enough, as a rule, to serve for the differentiation of species.
I was led to pay particular attention to the systematic significance of the
radial articular facets from the fact that in the fossil comatulids the radial pentagon
together with the centrodorsal is commonly the only portion of the animal pre-
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 377
served, and it therefore becomes essential, if we would arrive at a true knowledge
of the systematic position and interrelationships of these fossil species, to devote
particular attention to the same structures in the recent forms.
The surface of each radial typically shows five small rounded openings leading
into the interior; one of these, referred to previously as the central canal (figs. 9-11,
p- 65, 431, 432, p. 349, and 439, 440, p. 351), is on the articular face just above the
middle of the transverse ridge; there is one on either side near the dorsal inner
angle (fig. 600, pl. 17), and there is a pair (sometimes united into a single one)
at or near the inner margin of the dorsal surface (figs. 443, p. 351, and 600, pl. 17).
These openings serve for the passage of the chief cords of the dorsal nervous
system.
In the comatulids these cords lie usually just within the inner surface of the
radials, or they may even be on the surface so that they are not covered, except
in part, by calcareous deposit. In the Pentacrinitide, however, they lie well
within the calcareous substance of the plate so that their course within the segment,
which is the same in the pentacrinites as in the comatulids, may be much more
readily made out.
Each radial receives a branch from the two adjacent interradial nerve cords
which arise from the central capsule (figs. 63, 64, p.89); these two branches enter
through the two apertures at or near the inner margin of the dorsal surface (fig.
600, pl. 17); within the radial they gradually converge, meeting and fusing just
within the opening of the central canal on the articular face. From this point of
union of the two derivatives of the primary interradial nerve cords a branch is
given off laterally to either side which passes through the apertures near the dorsal
inner angle and continues through the adjacent radial to the corresponding posi-
tion within it. These connectives thus form a circular commissure all around the
calyx, as will be further explained when the nervous system is considered.
In many species, particularly among the Comasteride, Charitometride, Tha-
lassometride and Zenometrine, deep subradial clefts are found extending inward
between the dorsal surface of the radials and the ventral surface of the centro-
dorsal (figs. 166-169, p. 229, 194, p. 237, 203, p. 239, and 208-216, p. 241). These
clefts are narrow and slitlike externally, but are more spacious interiorly. They
are bounded laterally by the basal rays and the ridges in which these rays lie,
and inwardly by a wall formed by the close apposition of the small heavily caleci-
fied bars which form the thickened edges of the inner part of the dorsal faces of
the radials and the inner part of the ventral surface of the centrodorsal. There
is thus no connection whatever between the subradial clefts and the body cavity
of the animal, nor are the five clefts at all connected with each other. They are
in all respects, as stated by P. H. Carpenter, similar to the so-called interarticular
pores seen in the stems of the pentacrinites (fig. 127, p. 197, in upper part of stem).
The amount of concealment of the radials by the centrodorsal is, of course,
in direct proportion to the comparative size of that structure. In most species
the radials extend to the ventral rim of the centrodorsal, or slightly beyond it.
When the centrodorsal is reduced in size more of the surface of the radials is shown,
79146°—Bull. 82—15 25
378 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
as in the species of Comasteride in which cirri are absent (figs. 151-159, p. 221;
162, p. 223, 164, p. 227, and 165-170, p. 229); but when the centrodorsal is large, as
in the species of Crinometra, and in certain species of Catoptometra, Pachylometra,
Heliometra, Solanometra, Comatula, Comatulella, Comatella, and a few other genera (figs.
77, p. 130, 80, p. 133, 81, p. 134, 99, p. 160, 100, p. 162, and 101, 102, p. 163), the radials
may beso far withdrawn that part or even all of the first primibrachs are concealed.
Quite independently of the increase in size of the centrodorsal, the radials may be
more or less reduced, as is seen in various comasterids; this of course assists con-
siderably in their concealment. There appears to be not the slightest correlation
between these two processes. The outline of the centrodorsal, when large and show-
ing no trace of radial resorption is approximately circular, whereas the periphery
of the radial circlet is pentagonal; moreover the outer surface of the individual
radials where not in mutual apposition or attached to the centrodorsal is convex;
hence, though the radials may be entirely concealed in the median line, they are
almost invariably to be seen in the interradial angles as a more or less prominent
triangle gabeling over the ends of the basal rays (fig. 95, p. 157). These interradial
triangles commonly appear as structures having an entity of their own, and have
frequently been mistaken for basals, but a close examination will reveal a very
close sutural line dropping perpendicularly from the apex toward the base, and in
the middle of the base the tubercular elevations marking the external ends of the
basal rays.
P. H. Carpenter considered the radials of the pentacrinites comparable to
those of the stalked larva of Antedon, because they appear above the basals on the
exterior of the calyx as relatively large convex plates. This similarity is, however,
purely superficial; it is true that the external appearance of the radials in the two
bears a close resemblance but, while those of the pentacrinites are nearly horizontal,
the greater part of their external thickness extending horizontally inward over the
ventral surface of the basals to the center of the calyx, those of the stalked young
of Antedon are more slanting, not yet having begun to undergo the change to the
nearly horizontal attitude of those of the adult. The radials of the pentacrinites
can only be compared with the radials of the adults of such macrophreate species
as show a comparatively large portion of their radials on the exterior of the calyx,
as do the species of Atelecrinus (figs. 123, p. 192, 124, 125, p. 193, 414, p. 319, and
573, pl. 8) or Bathymetra; the radials of the very young comatulids are comparable
to the radials of such genera as Proisocrinus (fig. 128, p. 199), but by no means
comparable to the radials of the true pentacrinites.
The radials of the comatulids are in a phylogenetically more advanced condition
than those of the pentacrinites; that is, they have become more recumbent and the
outer (now dorsal) side has become shorter so that they have withdrawn more or
less (often entirely) within the area covered by the centrodorsal. The radials of
Atelecrinus, like the basals of the same genus, have undergone the least change,
and are essentially like the corresponding structures in the pentacrinites, in par-
ticular in the genus Endoxocrinus. In the genus Bathymetra of the Antedonide
also the radials are essentially as in the pentacrinites, though here the basals have
disappeared entirely from external view.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 379
In the majority of the comatulids the radials are just visible beyond the edge
of the centrodorsal, or terminate just at the edge (figs. 96-98, p. 159, and 228, p- 245).
The portion concealed by the centrodorsal is horizontal, but the portion extending
beyond it, while often horizontal, is usually more or less turned upward toward the
dorsoventral axis, and may even be parallel to that axis (figs. 94, p. 155, 110, p. 176,
and 112, p. 179). This slanting of the exposed portion of the radials indicates
that the transformation from a primitive vertical to a secondary horizontal position
has not quite been completed, but that the radial has reclined to an angle equal
to that proportion of the angle included by lines drawn from the center of the
dorsal surface of the radial pentagon, one to the middle of the distal outer edge of
the radial and the other to the middle of the proximal outer edge, which is equal
to the proportionate length of the free outer edge (measured perpendicularly) as
compared with the dorsal length beneath the centrodorsal. It is thus evident
that in no case does the comatulid radial depart greatly from a horizontal position.
There is but slight correlation between the comparative condition of the radials
and the various systematic groups, though in general the most primitive families,
such as the Pentametrocrinide (figs. 113, 114, p. 181, 119, p. 185, 120, p. 187, and
121, p. 189) and the Atelecrinide (figs. 123, p. 192, 124, 125, p. 193, 227, 228, p. 245,
414, p. 319, and 573, 574, pl. 8), show the least approach toward a horizontal position,
this tendency increasing with specialization until in certain of the Comasteride (figs.
164, p. 227, 165-170, p. 229, and 181, 182, p. 233) we find the condition perfected.
It is curious that the angles of the articular faces of the radials do not show a
definite correspondence to the recumbency of the radials as a whole. While as
a general rule there is a close relationship between the angles at which the articular
face is inclined to the dorsoventral axis and the angle at which the radial as a whole
is inclined to the horizontal, yet the former is far more constant in any given genus
or family, and is therefore a far more reliable systematic character. While the
latter is greatly affected by ontogenetical changes, the former is fairly constant
throughout life, and thus it comes about that in certain forms, as in very large
specimens of certain species of Pentametrocrinus, the radials may be quite concealed
exteriorly by the centrodorsal and perfectly horizontal, while the articular faces
are still inclined toward each other at an angle of 90° (or toward the dorsoventral
axis at an angle of 45°) as in the young. l
The Macrophreata, in all of which the angle made by the radial articular faces
to the dorsoventral axis is relatively large, tend to maintain a moderate angle of
basal inclination, though in the more specialized subfamilies of the Antedonide,
particularly those including phylogenetically overgrown species inclining (when
proportionately very large) toward the development of oligophreate characters,
the angle of basal inclination frequently becomes 180°; in the Oligophreata the
angle between the direction of the articular faces and the dorsoventral axis is much
less than in the Macrophreata, and in the most highly specialized forms these faces
may even be parallel to the dorsoventral axis, as for instance in many of the Coma-
steride, and here we find that the radials are always very nearly, often quite
recumbent, even if, as in many of the comasterids, they are not at all concealed by
the centrodorsal.
380 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
Among those comasterids in which the centrodorsal is reduced to a pentagonal
or stellate plate countersunk to the level of the radials a curiously specialized con-
dition obtains. The chambered organ and accessory structures primitively occupy
a position within the circlet of infrabasals, as it does in /socrinus and in Metacrinus;
with the degeneration of these plates, as exemplified by Hndoxocrinus in the pen-
tacrinites, the chambered organ becomes more ventral in its location, and occupies
a position in the center of the basal circlet, corresponding to the position it formerly
occupied in the circlet of infrabasals; in most comatulids it is contained within
the central cavity of the centrodorsal, and is bounded ventrally by the rosette,
which lies at the level of the dorsal surface of the radial pentagon (fig. 66, p. 93);
but in the comasterid species with stellate centrodorsals, it has again moved
ventrally, has been entirely extruded from the centrodorsal, and has taken a posi-
tion within the radial circlet, exactly corresponding to the position it formerly
held within the basal circlet, and before that within the infrabasal circlet (fig. 68,
p. 93). ,
In two genera of comatulids, Promachocrinus and Thaumatocrinus, both known
only from the recent seas, each of the five radials has morphologically undergone
longitudinal twinning or division which has resulted in the formation of two radials
(making 10 in all) each of which, so far as can be seen, is exactly like all the others.
These two genera both belong to the Macrophreata, but to entirely different
families, Thawmatocrinus falling in the Pentametrocrinide near Pentametrocrinus,
and Promachocrinus falling in the Antedonide and in the subfamily Heliometrine,
being very closely related to Solanometra, Anthometra and Florometra and, rather
less closely, -to Heliometra.
Although Promachocrinus possesses 10 radials all exactly alike, it possesses
the usual type of rosette and only five basal rays, each of which is situated directly
under the center of a radial. There are thus five radial and five interradial radials.
Although structurally and morphologically each interradial radial is the exact
counterpart and twin of a radial radial, its origin is altogether different. In the
early larva only radial radials occur, the interradial radials appearing at a con-
siderably later period as narrowly linear interradial plates which rapidly increase
in size, give rise to a process on their distal edge, and finally become quite indis-
tinguishable from the original five radials, bearing post-radial series which also
are quite indistinguishable from those borne on the five original radials.
In the genus Thaumatocrinus a young specimen of one species, 7. renovatus,
has been studied, and the relationships of the radials of each of the five pairs are
seen to be exactly as in Promachocrinus; in this specimen all five interradials have
reached a size not greatly inferior to that of the five original radials, though they
are still much less convex dorsally, and one of them, the posterior, has given rise to
the rudiment of one of the five supernumerary arms.
There are no basal rays in the species of Thaumatocrinus, but pseudo-basal
rays are present. These are five in number, and are situated between alternate
radials so that the radials are grouped in five pairs, each pair lying in a depression
between two pseudobasal rays. Viewed dorsally each of these pairs of radials
consists of the original radial to the left and the secondary (interradial) radial to
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 881
the right, just as in Promachocrinus the pairs consist of the radial radial to the left
and the interradial radial to the right.
_The growth changes by which the radials reach their adult form are thus
described by W. B. Carpenter: ‘‘At the commencement of the unattached stage
the form of the radials is that of a trapezium having its upper and lower side’
nearly straight and parallel while its lateral margins incline toward each other from
above downward. Externally they still present their original cribriform structure,
this being particularly obvious near the upper angles where the first-formed per-
forated plate has not been thickened by internal addition. But while the external
surface is convex, being arched from side to side, the internal is nearly plane, the
concavity of the cribriform plate being fiiled up by an ingrowth of its caleareous
reticulation, which still retains for the most partits original type. Thisingrowth, how-
ever, takes place in such a manner as to leave two deep channels which commence
from the lower angles of the plate and converge so as to meet in its center, forming
one large canal, which becomes completely covered in and passes to the upper mar-
gin of the plate, where it opens between the articular surfaces. These converging
channels, when the plates are in situ, are continuous with the diverging canals of
the two basals, whereon each radial abuts in such a manner that the primitive canal
that enters each basal communicates by its bifurcation with the converging canals
of two different radials, while the single canal of each radial is fed by the primitive
canal of two different basals. At each of the lower angles of the radial the wide
embouchure of the converging canal is in proximity with that of its adjacent radial,
and a continuity is thus established between the several parts of this canal system
not only radially but peripherally. At a somewhat later period the channels are
completely covered in so as to be converted into canals, and each embouchure
is divided by a small calcareous islet into two passages, one of them opening opposite
the canal of the basal, the other opposite the corresponding canal of the adjacent
radial. The upper margin of the radial now shows on either side of its center an
elevated articular surface, the calcareous reticulation of which is much closer than
that of the rest of the plate, and each of these gives attachment along its dorsal
border to a distinctly fibrous ligament connecting it with the corresponding articular
surface of the first primibrachs, while from the ridges which form its ventral border
there are now seen to pass toward the opposite face of the first primibrachs a set of
larger and more defined parallel fibers which, from their similarity to those occu-
pying a like position in the adult, we know to be muscular. In the passage of these
plates from their rudimental to their mature condition the principal alteration that
we notice, besides an immense increase in size, consists in a change in the propor-
tions of their principal dimensions, their thickness and solidity increasing much
more rapidly than their superficial extension. This increase takes place in such a
manner that the lateral portions of the plate are brought to the same thickness with
the median, the dorsal and ventral surfaces becoming nearly parallel, and the lateral
faces come to be flattened against each other and to adhere so closely that by the
apposition of the five plates a solid annulus is formed. The diameter of the central
space of this annulus, which is occupied by the rosette, does not increase during
growth in nearly the same degree as that of the periphery, the size of each plate
382 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM,
apparently being more augmented by addition to its external face than to its
lateral faces, so that the ratio of its breadth at its inner and its oater margins instead
of being, as at the conclusion of pentacrinoid life, about as two to three, comes to be
only as one to three, the shape of its dorsal face being thus changed from a trapezoid
fo a triangle with its apex truncated. Concurrently with these changes we find
that the various ridges and fossx on the external and ventral faces of the plate for
the attachment of the muscles and ligaments by which it is articulated to the first
primibrach are gradually developed into the form they present in the adult, and
that the characteristic ridges and furrows of its internal face, with the prolongations
that connect it with the ventral face of the rosette, make their appearance. All
these features are marked out when the size of the plate is still mimute as compared
with that which it ultimately attains.”
Fia.
EXPLANATION OF PLATES.
PLATE 1.
514.—A young specimen of Holopus rangii from Cuba attached by a spreading base after the man-
ner of a sessile barnacle. (Adapted from P. H. Carpenter.)
515.—The topmost columnal in a specimen of Metacrinus rotundus from southwestern Japan.
516.—A series of columnals from the center of the column of a species of Platycrinus, illustrating the
short spirally arranged type of columnal derived through the bourgueticrinoid type, viewed
from the broader side (a), from the narrower side (6), and from the end (c). (Drawing by
the author.)
517.—A fully grown specimen of Holopus rangii from Barbados attached by a thick unjointed column
after the manner of a stalked barnacle. (Adapted from P. H. Carpenter.)
518.—A portion of the dried column of a young pentacrinoid larva of Antedon bifida from England,
showing the long bourgueticrinoid columnals, and the annulus about the center of each.
(After W. B. Carpenter.)
519.—The twenty-third and twenty-fourth columnals in the stem of a pentacrinoid larva of Hathro-
metra proliza from East Greenland in which the first brachials have formed, and in which
the radianal is still present. (After Mortensen.)
520.—Columnals from the center of the column of a pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra sarsii. (Aftet
Mortensen.)
521.—Columnals from the center of the column of a pentacrinoid larva of Antedon petasus. (After
Mortensen. )
522.—Long bourgueticrinoid columnals from about the center of the stem of a fully grown penta-
crinoid larva of Hathrometra sarsti from Norway, in lateral (a) and in end (6) view. (After
M. Sars.)
523.—The upper portion of a columnal from a pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra prolixa from east
Greenland, in end (a) and in lateral (6) view. (After Mortensen.)
524.—Half of a columnal from a pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra sarsti from Norway, showing the
expanded end and the interlocking teeth along the fulcral ridge. (After M. Sars.)
525.—The articular face of a columnal of Proisocrinus ruberrimus from about the middle of the
column, showing the radial crenelle.
526.—Columnals from the middle of the stem of the pentacrinoid larva of Heliometra glacialis. (After
Mortensen.)
PLaTE 2.
. 527.—The column of a specimen of Bathycrinus maximus from the Indian Ocean, showing the pro-
gressive variation in the type of the columnals from near the proximal to near the distal
end; (a) the distal and (5) the proximal portion.
528.—Lateral view of a young specimen of Comatilia iridometriformis, showing the interradials.
(Drawing by the author.)
529.—Ventral view of a young specimen of Comatilia iridometriformis, showing the interradials.
(Drawing by the author.)
530.—The inner ends of the orals of a very young pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra sarsii from
Norway. (After M. Sars.) '
531.—Diagram illustrating the progressive resorption of the dorsal pole of the centrodorsal, and its
effect upon the arrangement of the cirri. (Drawing by the author.)
383
384 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
PuaTe 3.
Fic. 532.—A small pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra prolixa from East Greenland, showing the central
Fic.
Fic.
annulus in the columnals and, in the crown, basals and orals. (After Mortensen.)
533.—A pentacrinoid larva of Antedon mediterranea from Naples, showing the interrelationships of
the various parts. (Adapted from Chadwick.)
534.—The distal portion of the column and the root of a very young pentacrinoid larva of Hathro-
metra sarsii from Norway, showing the attachment by a digitating terminal stem plate to a
columnal of Rhizocrinus lofotensis. (After M. Sars.)
535.—The distal portion of the column of a pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra prolixa from east
Greenland, showing a digitating terminal stem plate. (After Mortensen.)
536.—The attachment of a fully grown pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra sarsii from Norway by a
typical digitating terminal stem plate and a short radicular cirrus. (After M. Sars.)
537.—The root of a young pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra sarsvi from Norway, showing the digitat-
ing terminal stem plate. (After M. Sars.)
538.—The distal columnals and attachment of a young pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra prolizxa
from East Greenland in which the radials are just beginning to form, showing the commence-
ment of the digitating form of terminal stem plate. (After Mortensen.) .
539.—The distal portion of the column of a young pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra sarsii from
Norway, showing the attachment, by a digitating terminal stem plate, to a Rhabdammina
abyssicola and, at the third columnal beyond, a second attachment by radicular cirri.
(After M. Sars.) ‘
540.—A young pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra sarsii from Norway, showing attachment by a
digitating terminal stem plate, beyond which are two attachments by radicular cirri, and
still further out unattached incipient radicular cirri. (After M. Sars.)
541.—Incipient radicular cirri on the columnals of a young pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra sarsii
from Norway; the columnals shown are the twenty-third and twenty-fourth above the
terminal stem plate. (After M. Sars.)
Puate 4.
542.—Oral view of a very young pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra proliza from East Greenland,
showing the orals. (After Mortensen.)
543.—Young pentacrinoid larva of Antedon bifida showing the terminal stem plate, the columnals
in process of formation, the basals, the orals, and, in the angles between the basals and the
orals, the beginnings of the radials. (After Wyville Thomson.)
544.—The crown and proximal columnals of a very young pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra prolixa
from East Greenland, showing the basals and orals. (After Mortensen.)
545.—A pentacrinoid larva of Heliometra glacialis at the time of the first formation of the cirri.
(Aiter P. H. Carpenter.)
546.—A young columnal consisting of a central annulus only in a pentacrinoid larva of Antedon
mediterranea from Naples. (Adapted from Bury.)
547.—Oral view of an early pentacrinoid larva of Compsometra lovéni from Port Jackson, New South
Wales, showing the orals and, beyond them, the basals.
548.—Oral view of a young pentacrinoid larva of Comactinia meridionalis from Yucatan, just after
the appearance of the radials.
Puarte 5.
549.—A radial radial from a specimen of Promachocrinus kerguelensis irom Kerguelen Island viewed
from the interior of the calyx (a) and laterally (6). (After P. H. Carpenter.)
550.—Dorsal view of a radial radial of a specimen of Promachocrinus kerquelensis from Kerguelen
Island. (After P. H. Carpenter.)
551.—An interradial radial from a specimen of Promachocrinus kerguelensis from Kerguelen Island
viewed from the interior of the calyx (a) and (6) laterally. (After P. H. Carpenter.)
7
Fia.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 385
552.—Lateral view of a radial from a specimen of Thaumatocrinus renovatus. (After P. H.
Carpenter.)
553.—The proximal columnals, calyx and arm bases of a pentacrinoid larva of Antedon bifida at the
time of the development of the cirri. (After W. B. Carpenter.)
554.—Inner end of a radial from a specimen of Antedon bifida. (After P. H. Carpenter.)
555.—Dorsal view of a radial from a specimen of Antedon bifida. (After P. H. Carpenter.)
556.—Ventral view of a radial from a specimen of Antedon bifida. (After P. H. Carpenter.)
557.—Two united radials from a specimen of Heliometra glacialis, together with that portion of the
rosette which is connected to them, viewed from the interior of the radial pentagon. (After
P. H. Carpenter.)
558.—The centrodorsal, arm bases, disk, and proximal pinnules of a specimen of Zenometra
columnaris from the West Indies, showing the relative proportions of the various parts.
(After P. H. Carpenter.)
Pate 6.
. 559.—The crown and proximal columnals of a very young pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra prolixa
from east Greenland, showing the basals, the orals, the beginnings of the radials (seen as
small rhombic plates), and the tentacles. (After Mortensen.)
560.—Part of the calyx of a young pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra prolixa from east Greenland,
showing portions of two basals and of two orals and, in the center, the right posterior radial
(the larger plate to the right) and the radianal (the smaller plate to the left); beyond the
radial is seen the first commencement of a first primibrach. (After Mortensen.)
561.—The crown and proximal columnals of a pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra prolixa from east
Greenland, showing the basals, radials (followed by primibrachs), radianal, and orals, and
bringing out well the characteristic shape of the last named. (After Mortensen.)
562.—Oral view of a pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra prolixa from east Greenland in which the
first brachials have formed, showing the orals, radianal, and radials; the primibrachs have
been removed. (After Mortensen.)
563.—The crown and proximal columnals of a young pentacrinoid larva of Hathrometra proliza,
showing the basals, radials (followed by the primibrachs and first brachials), orals, and
radianal. (After Mortensen.)
564.—Lateral view of the crown and proximal columnals of a young pentacrinoid larva of Hathro-
metra prolixa from east Greenland, showing the relationships of the basals, radials, orals,
primibrachs, and succeeding brachials. (After Mortensen.)
-
PLATE 7.
. 565.—The calyx of a specimen of Marsupites americanus from Mississippi in (a) lateral and in (6)
dorsal view, showing the basals (B), the central plate or centrale (C), the very large infra-
basals (I), and the radials (R). (After Springer.)
566.—The infrabasals (underbasals), basals, and radials of a specimen of Metacrinus nobilis from
southwestern Japan from which the column and the arms have been removed. (Drawing
by the author.)
567.—The isolated circlet of infrabasals of a specimen of Metacrinus nobilis from southwestern Japan,
viewed ventrally (a), laterally (5), and dorsally (c). (Drawing by the author.)
568.—Section through the calyx and arm bases of a specimen of Metacrinus nobilis from southwestern
Japan, showing the circlet of infrabasals in place and their relationship with the other
elements of the calyx. (Drawing by the author.)
569.—The centrodorsal of a very young specimen of Antedon mediterranea from Naples, surrounded
by the three infrabasals; a single basal is also shown, near the bottom of the figure. (After
Bury.) 7
570.—Dorsal view of the centrodorsal and infrabasals in a young pentacrinoid larva of Antedon medi-
terranea from Naples. (After Bury.)
386 BULLETIN 82, UNITED STATES NATICNAL MUSEUM.
Fic. 571.—Lateral view of the centrodorsal and infrabasals in a young pentacrinoid larva of Antedon
mediterranea from Naples. (After Bury.)
572.—The radial circlet and inclosed structures of specimens of Uintacrinus socialis from Kansas ;
(a) a specimen with basals and infrabasals within the radial circlet; (b) a specimen with
basals only within the radial circlet; the small subpentagonal central plate in each figure
is the centrale, representing the central or suranal plate of the echinoids and the entire
column in the stalked crinoids. (After Springer.)
PLATE 8.
Fie. 573.—Lateral view of an immature specimen of Atelecrinus balanoides from Cuba, showing the
proportionately large size of the basals in the young. (After P. H. Carpenter.)
574.—The centrodorsal and radials of a specimen of Atelecrinus balanoides. (After P. H. Carpenter.)
575.—Dorsal view of the basals and radials of a specimen of Atelecrinus balanoides from the West
Indies. (After P. H. Carpenter.)
PuLatTE 9.
Fia. 576.—Lateral view of the skeleton of a pentacrinoid larva of Antedon bifida from England, at the time
when the arms are just beginning to appear, before the development of the cirri, showing j
the relationships of the basals, radials, orals, and radianal. (After W. B. Carpenter.)
PuatTeE 10.
Fia. 577.—Dorsal view of the radial pentagon of a specimen of Antedon bifida from England, showing the
rosette in position. (After W. B. Carpenter.) {
578.—The rosette of a specimen of Antedon bifida in position, with portions of the radials; this is the
magnified central part of the preceding figure. (After W. B. Carpenter.)
Puate 11. F
Fie. 579.—Ventral view of the skeleton of the calyx and arm bases of a fully grown pentacrinoid larva
of Antedon bifida just before the loss of the larval stem, showing the relationships of the
basals and radials; the centrodersal has been removed. (After W. B. Carpenter.)
Puate 12.
Fig. 580.—An isolated basal of a young specimen of Antedon bifida at the time of detachment from the
larval column, seen from the outside of the calyx. (After W. B. Carpenter.)
581.—An isolated basal of a young specimen of Antedon bifida at the time of detachment from the
larval column, seen from the interior of the calyx. (After W. B. Carpenter.)
582.—Dorsal view of a basal of Antedon bifida in process of conversion into a rosette, showing the
partial resorption of the first formed lamella. (After W. B.» Carpenter.)
583.—Ventral view of the calyx of a young specimen of Antedon bifida, showing the basals altered
by endogenous growth in preparation for the formation of the rosette. (After W. B.
Carpenter.)
584.—Dorsal view of a basal of Antedon bifida which has been nearly remodeled by accretion and
resorption into the form requisite to constitute the rosette. (After W. B. Carpenter.)
585.—Ventral view of a basal of Antedon bifida in process of conversion into a rosette which has been
nearly modeled by resorption and accretion into the form requisite to constitute the rosette
by union with those on either side. (After W. B. Carpenter.)
586.—Ventral view of a basal of Antedon bifida which has been nearly remodeled by accretion and
resorption into the form requisite to constitute the rosette. (After W. B. Carpenter.)
Fic.
Fic.
MONOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING CRINOIDS. 387
Puate 13.
587.—Articular faces from the middle (a) and the basal (b) portions of the cirrus in a specimen of
Antedon bifida. (After W. B. Carpenter.)
588.—Dorsal view of the skeleton of the calyx and arm bases of Antedon bifida just after the loss of the
larval column, showing the relationships of the centrodorsal (which bears five mature and
five rudimentary cirri), the basals and the radials, and the extension of the visceral mass
as far as the IBr.; the radianal is visible in the posterior interradius. (After W. B.
Carpenter.)
Puate 14.
. 589.—Ventral view of an isolated rosette in a specimen of Antedon bifida. (After W. B. Carpenter.)
590.—Dorsal view of an isolated rosette in aspecimen of Antedon bifida. (After W. B. Carpenter.)
591.—An incipient rosette ina young specimen of Antedon bifida, formed by the coalescence of the
five altered basals. (After W. B. Carpenter.)
Puate 15.
. 592.Ventral view of the centrodorsal of a young Antedon bifida at the time of detachment from
the larval column. (After W. B. Carpenter.)
593.—Ventral view of the centrodorsal of a fully grown specimen of Antedon bifidafrom Oban. (After
W. B. Carpenter.)
Puate 16.
594.—Dorsal view of the skeleton of the calyx and arm bases of a fully-grown pentacrinoid larva
of Antedon bifida just before the loss of the larval column, showing the relation between
the centrodorsal, basals, radials, and arm bases; in the interradius at the bottom of the figure
is seen the radianal. (After W. B. Carpenter.)
595.—A specimen of Arachnocrinus bulbosus, showing the similarity between the radials and the
swollen axillaries. (After Springer.)
596.—An isolated radianal from a young specimen of Antedon bijida at the time of detachment from
the larval column. (After W. B. Carpenter.)
597.—The centrodorsal of a specimen of Antedon bifida in dorsal (a) and in lateral (b) view. (After
W. B. Carpenter.)
PLATE 17.
. 598.—Internal (ventral) view of an isolated radial of Antedon bifida at the time of detachment from
the larval column. (After W. B. Carpenter.)
599.—External (dorsal) view of an isolated radial of Antedon bifida at the time of detachment from
the larval column. (After W. B. Carpenter.)
600.—Inner end of a radial from a specimen of Antedon bifida from England. (Aiter W. B. Car-
penter. )
601.—Dorsal face of a radial from a specimen of Antedon bifida irom England. (After W. B. Car-
penter.)
602.—Ventral face of a radial from a specimen of Antedon bifida from England. (After W. B. Car-
penter.)
t TERA ae TOW OMe
hye as
toa f A oD ates io Teh fi 1 es stanlbyh ing a
Cwatt ve ae et) j SOAR eats Lh, ed Me ——-
aiqiebaenitss mpl ia
jee A wy (ha iy oy wey dpieroet drs 9
oy { et ee sha fe » high b: ahh lor 1 Bleeds, 1a fr italy ow
~
*
«aa mit sy ae as Tick eh) leks aatind Sioa Neriem eM te
j " ih x eee ae, Se male eal” yA aL deel om
4 vee ®
ak grt aes
f lpia te ihail
hee ea: pea Dea inalaeoe Avs ota Gitta ito bal? arth =
A ¥> WOQhs* mee. dina Pak. Tare ARR Da Ae. ae Le ‘jae tl he ibhete be ety Teka
CAs ot fh Fess Ogg eA a al aera el ae ale Jed cae lae Beg Med aes
Pati) APN wah sO, ich pape av®
Aap asin | ok
(AE) eiigs a0 be Ga ge ph Aires Vi shite ehh ee ne "a
MPa 1 TF aay Be a ae
Lr as ond AL Saat a BO sau Sat Uta fis ah tte aah ea
— \ RF ul a
ph aig oche?. hy
we aves! f ;
Aiba’ |) CANE aby rin della aul) hy ave oath hs weer ; a
8h the Oe dee {aria sah (yi et eS aad er geen ‘hee
Woy ile eta Sele eek aman ee ty ane alien alt
a ; ° Sen Deh Ay, Fh sea 4 a
‘ ‘yl ey A OI alt, Us harie ay tal om lane soe ee
igang Ae ought Tone ake Meno Oe
hy Sadie (lire! natgeg pete hey Cnsplvane fin
sighs te A | ie RES aot
jo ee as (Moree AML ltd ina ty aps
; oT aaa be ag Ri Sta ae
ioe Lea hay wp ti E9 nine attr awe ieee Pe
A Nasciete Ly a
ee ih f A e ¥,
ran
st (A oleh aK Sie haat Pyiyit “aU re joe
. ‘pokey 160° bdinsh 1 A Bag en a “
iam ee a ve al dins u ea’,
jo py ae Aw tealey
fe ih MUGS hole, Dee titan ah Aiea lahat ha gin beeponke
} af iy
hed 6 ie: | ie cata Te pli th a reel, itr eos nae telat
Ai : it ikke 1 Ser neal ae
ina oil be ‘ ue at “LT Lal 4
oh po Lp EC’ ofa ee wee
i a
‘ hhh SOAP i “— DAG ae
oe: Yak Oe
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
etme
—
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
SEU BULLETIN 82, PART | PL. 2
527
JLLUSTRATIONS OF CRINOID STRUCTURE.
FOR EXPLANATION OF PLATE SEE PAGE 383
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM BULLETIN 82, PARTI PL
{
ATTACHMENTS OF PENTACRINOIDS.
FOR EXPLANATION OF PLATE SEE PAGE 384.
BULLETIN 82, PART | PL. 4
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
DETAILS OF THE STRUCTURE OF PENTACRINOIDS.
FoR EXPLANATION OF PLATE SEE PAGE 384.
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
F VARIOUS CRIN
RADIALS O
PLAT
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
BULLETIN 82, PART CiPENG
PENTACRINOIDS OF HATHROMETRA PROLIXA,
FOR EXPLANATION OF PLATE SEE PAGE 385,
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
BULLETIN 82, PART
UNDERBASALS
566
a
INFRABASALS OF MARSUPITES, UINTACRINUS, ANTEDON, AND METACRINU
FOR EXPLANATION OF PLAT 385 A 386.
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
BULLETIN 82, PART 1 PL. 8
BASALS OF ATELECRINUS.
For EXPLANATION OF PLATE SEE PAGE 386.
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
CROWN OF
A YOUNG PENTACRINOID
F
F
ANTE
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
BIFIDA
N
ANTED
OF
ROSETTE
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM BULLETIN 82, PART | PL. 11
FULLY GROWN PENTACRINOID OF ANTEDON BIFIDA
FOR EXPLANATION OF PLATE SEE PAGE 386
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
\ N
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
BULLETIN 82, PART
Cir TE
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
BULLETIN 82, PART | 14
ROSETTE OF ANTEDON BIFIDA.
For Ex
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
CENTRODORSAL OF ANTEDON BIFIDA.
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
BULLETIN T F
CENTRODORSAL AND RADIANAL OF ANTEDON & § AND ARACHNOCRIN(
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM B ik
3ULLETIN 82, PA
600
601
RADIALS ¢ ANT F
IN ee
abyscicola, Amtedons.:2..--..:-<2--s2sa-.- 43
IBS MOUS s-eee es ose 4. come t= 43
a@byesorum,, Antedon.-22)-2.--2-2-- e242 43
IPrOMmachocrimus: 2 aces ys 2 22-4 47,59, 938
Wnhaumatometraune esc. ete a oe 43
acanthaster, Neometra..........--..--.---- 147
MaeerDa eA BtOLOMetT as sco. noone 2-02 ees sisenie 81
PNG Oa ROTO Deter yateciereys ieici= = aie = ores ete Fie nic 41, 43, 51
Coe SE PAMIUOd Olle eee S asics cs ccs see ce eseenas 43
oecwlometrac sce. cms scce cose 43, 63, 367
AWCEOMCTERNULS sey eee sate resale one mie ose sicisysis, Jena 174
PRCHITIGIIG UTR ets cere clecisrcte mee eicie = cine’ = sisice 26,
29, 30, 31, 34, 35, 36, 40, 41, 45, 49, 121
PU SMART He gecodsee goo sseeesBEeEaenes 39
LTO RUINS Sete se ere eases =< Sos oie are a0 37, 39, 47
RT base see cee = = oie a raisielsizistel ste) es oe 38
Be ll ieeeneere como fen cec ines ers stols 47, 52
One tine see ete re: 37, 38, 47, 50, 52
DINOS E ER cen ae eae cle si ace wiscig (sie 46
lDOAIODTER cases coSa aos ase pECoETeaoe 46
EnrsechiiO Lace ee see sel aii ara ma iayain 45, 49
PRET h se ose Heese see aNeeseEsacoe 47
GOP PICO seer ee a ee aan 39, 46, 49
GURL ee oe ae elo oe sara 39
CnC CAME e eee eer eee nepali 46
NSIT bees eae arctan 46
Pcl suiet Cala ater teiara is ayia aetna] ate l== 47, 49
dimples cece a= nese as nice an 47, 51
echinoptera....----.------------------ 46
elongata: -.-.2---+-------22-2--=-=-- 2% 46
ADT A eee eee ero e 46, 49, 50, 53
pracilig. «--2----------+-------------- 49
grandicalyx.....------------------ 38, 47, 52
imperialis.......------------------ 29, 31, 33
APPERIMNO CT Ae se ese cee eae ie = = 39
NOWETIRINSe ee eee ce eee nics ee ei sin = ain 53
japonica. ...---.--------------------- 37, 47
AUKest Gee eco oe sinc is =n mem 39
ineatae eee see esses vias = eam 46
NITtOralIS eee eee cee oes = eae 47
macrobrachius....-------------------- 49
MAactilataeeessee eae. = == --~-=——= 46, 49, 51, 53
magnifica.....------------------7777° 47
meridionalis-= .s222.2222--=--42+5- 02 46, 53
MOY Orless-2-< ein === == == 38
79146°—Bull. 82—15 26
Page.
Actinometra multibrachiata.............-. 46
MuUlGiidas — =i 2 xcs veces ssecenee 39, 47, 51
multiradiata....... 33, 38, 46, 49, 51, 53, 54, 55
DN OTH wane cac se so tic aie coe se cae meets 46
NODS his ection eo ee eee 47,51
TORT s\<icisiee sotee aia saa ee net 48, 54
MO VEl-PUIN OSS ona nse = eae eee 37, 46
parvicirra.....-. 37, 38, 39, 46, 49, 50, 51, 52, 54
DAU CICHUAS see acto 39, 46, 48, 51, 52
DECUIDALAL cs 505 facies enicinoe's 33, 45, 49, 51, 52
POLESTUDA oe ac woe sgse =e ennai 51
POlOM neces. esas eoce ee led Se eee eee AT
DOLOWM ee sci on ene tee eee 37
polymorphs... = seen ee ee eee 36
Ul Chall see ese eee een ee 46
(tle rea bee are oe ee ence anor 46
OPA ian ae iale . 47,49, 51, 52
TODUSUA. 2 o.02 os ce dann oS as eee eee 38, 39
TOD WSL ULS fete ae oe ee clei 37, 47, 52
TOLAIATIAS sos — 3s oes o oe ee eee es 46, 51
UD IPINORA so em ae ene a ae eee 53
achlepelin. se seea se eee ana eee 47
achlegelit ns 5. oscar ae ne 21 wiisniaw alee 37
SENLORN 5 <.ce = oso eae eae eee ee 46, 53
BUM PLEX: sc sciscnecse = ere ee 46, 51
SOL RELA ses oe ere arse iee arrears 38, 39, 45, 49, 52
SI NUS BE Ras obasmad SOE Seer eecosecous aH 39
Bp) jUVces css oc seme cis seo eae 39
stolligera--2-2----05e-chise =e nee 46, 48, 49
BETOUN scare oe aaa ea eae ioe react fale 39
trichoptera....-.----.--+----------=== 47
typica....--2..-------------- 37, 46, 49, 52, 53
VALOS Ee tee os cle ee ce erin eee 46
variabilis.......------------------< 39, 47, 51
wahlbergii. ......--.-----------+----+- 33
aculeata, Antedon....-.--.--------------- 43
@hlorometra..-<:---------.2---- sss ce ns 43
acuticirra, Antedon......----.------------ 38
Craspedometra...-..-----------+------ 38,
45, 48, 52, 139, 253, 292, 328, 329, 361, 375
acutiradia, Antedon.....--..-------------- 42
Stiremetra. /....---------02--eee eee ee 42
‘Adelometrace.s2 cc -sesnin= 2a anemia 304, 308
angustiradia.......-------++--++++----- 45
tenuipes.....----+----+++-2eeeeeese eee 301
390 INDEX.
Page. Page.
adeons, Antedon Ais. <0i<:c:t/e < eeicierectneslsaah 39, 44 | alternans, Actinometra..............-. 37, 39, 47
Gomatulact .-2 ccs ccesee orcecies 25, 26, 31, 32 @omantheria: |: sc2.ccmceew ie eiene = 37, 47, 229
Oligometrides......... 25; 31,32, $9/44, 52''293' | silternata, Antedon: —. 225-2 seneceee ence 43
adriaties, Antedon..c..-.-s-sce- os se cen 21 Thaumatometras --.-e-nseeeeoee eee eee 43
43, 56, 60, 123, 132, 171, 300, 315, 316 | Amblystoma punctatum..........-.------- 182
fegyptica, Iridometra.................----- 54 | amboinsw, Craspedometra.........-------- 48
coqualis; sAmtedons. = wisesn an eewisseemeneens 45 | amboinensis, Antedon.............-------- 49
fequipinna, Antedon.........-......------ 38,45 | americana, Trichometra......--...-------- 309
BHA A ted ON ate =o a see eee eee eee 48) || Amphimetra.-- 2. -----~-0-- sere 28, 117, 291, 306
Hoteromettarcccs setae case eeieecis 48 BNICOPS oar. < cate ain ls asta wlcloize ame alanis 44, 45, 54
SEPA WAMILOC ON ete eet see nin eee 49 crenulata x... <.secscis-chrelesaece 38, 39, 44, 45, 51
Dichrometra flagellata var............-- 52 denticulata scececceese ore a-cencaee eae 43
Sroplomettaesse- oe eeeee eee ae 49, 145 Ciseoidean = este anes 28, 39, 44, 49, 51, 235, 285
agassizii, Antedon.........- wentislce ss sieeeite 51 @USHOR A. ciate 141, 255, 285, 328, 329, 361
halsssomoetra. =. soe. oe oe = teense 51 JACQUINO .ceeree 2 -eeee ee eee ee 31, 32
AAO Me tke ace cine eet alalare atele lela 246 ISS VAISSIMIA =< oto ccajz a alae See ee 35, 44
IHCErths- hoes ce aes setscen esses acme 42 mul bertia-.<e/.- 2 ee- 31, 32, 35, 39, 44, 48, 49, 53
Vala n sco wce cs cicnecere sete ce nese 42 MONET = ose os omio seesaw Soccer 44, 49, 53
alata AMed Onecare ences esac erie toon cee 36 MENIALOGON See Stee ee eee ee 48
Neocomatella. ... 36, 46, 125, 247, 321, 326, 353 philiberti...... 31, 32, 45, 255, 283, 328, 329, 361
alboflava, Parametra...............-.-.-.- 239 pinniformis. . Sl eial eet epee ferent a telat 37, 43
albonotata, Actinometra.........-....---- 39 [DIOGUCtA sea peenocseee ees eee eens 53, 266
albopurpurea, Cyllometra............-..-. 54, 289 Pessella tars a... ois.sctsino< cee ain= salen sl ameiaeas 29, 31
INCOR BB a asemoaqosesesess 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 34 VALUPINNA. Jn. schu e occeecinciies 38, 45, 48, 54
Denn eth ses Sec ee Sac wecioce cee 28, 29,50 | Analcidometra armata................- 34, 44, 293
GNI EY SpooaonaasdosenSbobouacosaete 24 | anceps, Amphimetra.................... 44,45, 54
echinopterass-- << see os see eee 29, 34 AMPEG ON. 2 iss cnn Soaitelsoes tere eee 44, 45
GlonPataee se scciseeo sees scente eas 29))|(andersoni, -Amtedon=<sostct ee see 40, 48, 49
exchrichtilsc.2- <0. ccecee esse 29 Pontiometra... 40, 48, 49, 255, 287, 329, 349, 361
CULO ptenacee eee ee ease ee eee 24 | angusticalyx, Antedon.......-... eee ee 45
Mapellates: Paces ce sca 6- cee misters 29 Pach VlOMEUassc-ccsea se = eek ene “45, 367
placialintonce cece cen cease ee eee aes 32 | angustipinna, Antedon.............-.-...-. 43
(Heliometra) glacialis.......... - 27 TROMCWALS. ocececessiece soe oot eS 43
HOMMO Me eee eae seamen ase eee 24, 25, 26 | angustiradia, Adelometra.................. 45
JSDORICKS cacao nee eee nc eee ees 29 Antedon : cence ceiwsSoes eee or eeaaee 45
MIANOSVI SE czas cise sise s esie cise cies gels 29'| annulata, Actinometra.............----c06 38
MUlHAdas os oe ccece ses ce eee cone cmene 29, 30 Comanthus. .... 38, 46, 47, 52, 54, 135, 238, 266
MOVES UN CEE os cae sisinee cae ates isreie sere 29 Comatula.. 2265-552 se12 22 5-2 e os casaes 27
palmata.co oor cc tnceceesadosseseee 28, 29, 34 | anomalus, Atelecrinus................-.- 302, 319
Pairs ee he soa se sae eae 29°30, 86) | antarctica, Antedon-.---c--ccesseuses seco 43
POLEBUB S oa. aisicrinis eel Sa eee ne sees 30 Solanometra. seco nG sess eee 43, 321, 371
phalanpiumss 222 sec sac se ccesceeeees 29. || PAmted Ons penss ce ace ce ecce mess 7, 24, 25, 26, 28, 33,
polyartlira..-2= ose esse aceceeeeee 29 34, 35, 40, 41, 42, 49, 51, 57,
purpures.ss. css. c- comencceosaee eae 30 118, 119, 120, 122, 125, 158,
TOSCO, oto: -oinjosicieiee fe sia sitter amen 29, 130 161, 193, 194, 208, 210, 218,
BAYS os cose cie' Ge anc ecieee meeeeteeias 27, 30 220, 226, 228, 236, 238, 250,
BRVIDT oe cept ae esate ee eee 29 252, 268, 284, 286, 298, 300,
Lespellatay cee aciscsiaae coe tl eeeeceoe 29 316, 318, 322, 323, 324, 325,
TAMOVENSIS! ces = atte sso de meeeeaeeee 29, 37 326, 328, 329, 331, 335, 337,
WHIIDONPIL. <1. ci2 oslsecirctoe nin ciomeeeeee Lyle, SO 339, 341, 343, 346, 347, 358,
Alectro dentate ccc: mc tcc co cece wa Senn aigioe 360, 366, 372, 374, 375, 378
alfera, nna marina ..).\.c000+ ccc cmeeeeeee 23 abyssicolac- 222 cose woe cnc sue aes 43
s
INDEX. 391
Page.
AMPEG ONADYSSOLUM 0. = o26- 2. a. Bae See Se 43 | Antedon columnaris............-.---.---- ine 44
FAC O2 | aerate se eiee siete) oie ala fain =) = a 43 COMPFCBSH so. 2 «25 se ne ee ee 44
aculeata Se Ne aaa Shere Seo le. 2 a Sera eee 43 CONUCTA. accom Jase ee ae eee eee 49
acuticirra Bee eicteeteleiatalettaieleleraietaiel= eee 38 CONJUN GONE. <<< 3's. nie mos as SES 45, 48
RGU CRAG etna aeinc omc ole slelstia/=nieia(- eee 42 CrassIpInN ar .-n.-so2 epee eee oe 48
adeonze Peta aia are nia shave <\nia, © wis'ala'a's ocr he 39, 44 Crenulatascas- sc. tees coc ee es ee 38
BONAR CAs a-)omjeze cats =n ILE 21, 43, CUDENSIB? «22. .-nes cog eet tee ee 34, 37, 44
56, 60, 123, 182, 171, 300, 315, 316 decipiens. 2. csssccnes see sere ee 39
eequalis Bees ei oieis alos ain iain ese 45 delectal..2tcaiccovenese sce seer Cee 44
Ee CUT Desai iia) si <fs)=/aimtatosars = lat=mvajs = tahoe 38, 45 denticulata,.,.<.-<.02:0hec0<002 soso 43
MATES SS at cin Se vinsc/aicia'mn\eimeyafoe PR 48 disciiormiss.<s<c --aeascrec os eee 45
BUT SS ani rant aia) nvain or\-ininiani =e eee 49 discoidea: <.5./.- ce. <cneeracescce es eeee 43
USS 771 see ctetetalas a <bejate inate w. = a1 seta 51 distin ctay S53. 2 soa. 2 eee 45, 46
etter ieate <inroieisciein'= = <a (s\2) = clots 36 Géderleini. <<. .Jc00s2-sseiccs 47 -ee eee 53
Pale rata eeeta a(t at-\n oiniela = alaminiminl [aioe 43 GUbenie. 25 sac e ene ees 43
MIM OINCDSIR S25 oo cos s ace 49 diibenii............ 34, 38, 43, 90, 300, 316, 339
BEG CS DS eee eee eee aeatatteta st lt 44, 45 duplexsa- ees -< ee ea = eee 44
ANG STAON secon cen ass 256 5s eee 40, 48, 49 echinata. ..-.:.--: +2 -sese << eee eeeeee 42
Ber PaIA CHL Y Keene = nara a sais) = tei 45 Ole ganas. 20:/esasne= cos cen ene sane 39, 48, 52
SOULS PLO Beet =e afar a= ata) ate 43 elongates... cents seen eee 37, 45, 49
PUR OWIR INU ere miaiene oom clnlelsiaiaiei=/aie sara 45 emendatmX..--cses=: ces eee ee eee 50
RAEN CA ee alas) rela a aiata «a= nine 43 CTIN ACER. cccae cs coe an once Eee eee 49
MANTUA UA eee oe oe sal ae aicistale sic 5 encgeeiee 34, 44 eschrichti¢s2: jas cau tee tees eee 43, 55
BUTCH Aaa ee silliness a eae eels 39, 45 eschrich thie sns- aes en ae cees sen 53
SUA) see seeen sacle ose sae 38 @XICUA. 255 -- sooo ese sa see eee 43
ancien isi P) sseeeseeeapaeooccescescaccs 43 fieldiak 0:80: Seccciccnces- see ae 50
Ipalanold esate reese ssaeans asec 44 finschiteecs]0 sec. eee eee eee ees 49
RHI CUNT Ens eee ate aerial ieiesenteiote 42 bt Soe ean nocencceoossats 24 37, 45, 49, 52
pscseti-Smiithlee se eee ean = ete 50. flava--scocsee ie neie ace eee 52
Tye Lae oe eet ey yjeis.ctc sant he 48, 54 flavomaculatasscce sss ose eee es eee 50
Sy ete PUTIN CBs ays)a aie site as 5 = ieee 48 flexilisy sno. ce cosctecccicescos . eee 43, 44
bengalensis......-.----.--------+-=--- 48 flnctuansses-ses ee = ees eee = = 42
pacer See ee eet eee 39, 44, 52 SOTPONIA c. else wcll ee oe oe 24,118
pili dain es scicto es eseicceses 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, STACI: «5 o/s 2 ais ania See oe =e 42
27, 28, 29, 31, 33, 38, 43, 55, 56, 69, 90, 118, granuuliféra. <2. 0 2c) ose. 22aeueee ena 36, 45
119, 120, 121, 123, 167, 196, 217, 219, 233, EVER. seceessdileces. eee 39, 45
251, 271, 294, 300, 315, 316, 320, 321, 322, hageni.........------------++------+-- 44
325, 326, 333, 334, 335, 339, 340, 347, 369 hiperil- isso hot ate eee 53
bigradata.........-.-----+-+------+29- 51 hirsutaseecec ase = sees ee eee es eee 43
pie CUA eye afer = prate seis ale 37, 45 hupierie=ss..ss—--2- = a= 38, 43, 49, 300, 316
bipartipinna.....-..-..---------+----- 38 hystrix......--.-----------------eeee- 43
bispinosa. .-.-.-----------------+--+- 42 imparipinna......----------- 38, 45, 49, 52, 54
brevicirras- .-22-2-2------------=------ 50 impinnata. ......----------+--++-+-+- 44
DEB ye UM eae es ssc ia ate ae aa ae i 45, 49 ineequalis........-----------+-+++++---> 45
brevipinna......--.--.---------+----> 44 COPIA. ve oe cna ee=asm nese s peas = See 42
TENET LEM ee ea ke = lo farel= ahs carnal lah 42 STIR ec ics sere slo nis a(e oats. et 42
TiAORSES 28 a ee See ae OSes asco 39 INCOMMOGA. 2-5 Ge is ks - Se - == = eee 47
DrOGklieeetee eee ne oa oes oe chess 48 IN OICH ee ae oe we ee eno 45, 52, 53, 54
CAPENSIS. ...-------2---2-- 2 ees seess 54 infOrMIss «<= se ees sees ees oe 44
(@nnee On opeossidaeeenseeee 37, 38, 44, 50, 54, 55 inopinata. .....--.--------+++++++++- 50
carpenteri........----------+++-+++7>> 39, 43 insignis. .....-----------+-+++++22++--- 39
Laren ee ns oe aie reee st 48 irregularis. ....-.----------+-++++++-- 39
AianiGngich ne -esebeoosecuepeeepaoas 45 japonica. ....-------------+++++-++-°+ 49
392 INDEX.
Page. Page.
Antedon klunzingeri.........-------------- 48 | ‘Antedon\prolixa)- 222.250. ..05eeeeeeese 43, 55
kraepelini.-.- ss<<= 2 faecee <= cet 48 IDIOUGG Ls) rates ot sisson eee 45, 49
leeViclYas <2 = 556 <4ciawe oa ca eae 37, 45 PUlcHella esse sects ects cisterns apr eeeee 36
VesvipiNNa.. <- <<< 7 ee oats oc eee ain 38, 44 PUM AS Socios asincc eases eee 39, 44, 47
Wesvisi nic cs ce ce Se cece s Ceeeaeae 43 UCU AE el oe eloed aes um .cidsintosReeeee 43
[se VISSIMAe es eee ei cele eile cronies eee 44, 53 quiadratas 552532 sdse~ <5 sco osmemaees 43
Natipinniesc se: = eee aie senile ee 42 Quinduplicavas.<..c<- 2 <a1a= eee 45
Tepida sae ece sc sf cele aes eaeteaer 49 quingwecostatas 22k Joos c: scone 44
lineata, sc=.so.kes cones os scene eee 43 TOPALISS osc cabs sack cates can Soe 45
Jonpicixra =< <5 == seme =12 =e en 42 POPINBs = sods Sr 3)-\toisesc ee Oe 39, 45
Jonripinna. 6... s.-.-26= nce ene= 43 RETO Ge ara re otal ate lao 43
WOVEN este ce eee eee se Ieee 39, 44 TOYMAU CIs. caoces sma aeeers se eee 45, 54
WUOWIClssees 25522 aac sa nictelseisemer 38, 48, 52 rhomboidea..2.\....<0.« s0<usis 2s seueeeee 43, 51
NUsbAnicas ss csoaec shes us eerste 42, 44, 55 TODUBtiaue o.ssisa so eae ee ee 44
MACTOCISCUS# a2 =\s121- 0 | 2) m cela eerie 51, 54, 91 MOBAC CA antes a 2 no ts ewe area 33, 38, 43, 55
MMCTOMEIN AS cots) = alsa [-nieemetedat 44, 49 TUDIPINGSA «...)2.5 <,s:2)20.0.0.c nen aisle ewe 34
magellaniess = <a 2 e\eel=1= «aerate 38, 43 BAVIGD Ys soe nin se 527s swew Soe sos aeeeee 45, 54
MAP NIC ITA see ee es -ys2 = ee eer 54 BCIATELLS. des coco nie a -oee see Ee 54
MAPICA Me so 2s aie a1 Sa eicisicte, a 21S a tora eee 45 SELMUPINNA. Sasser sc 37, 43, 49, 51, 53, 54
TDA INA GAS ee aie = <i a eee meee oe ear 45, 54 SMU IGS ssc Sse e odes Sexy aoe ee 45
MUAY LOOSL s sera es sae asl ie tata te raeeret 48 SP asec ase) s ae ees eee orem 51
MGCILENTAD OR ese = ee eee 21, 22, 23, 25, BPICAtEs cas .te aso re eee 37, 45, 48, 55
30, 31, 32, 43, 55, 56, 119, 120, 121, 122, NBPICALA. cos ens o5e een she oes sees 50
123, 125, 132, 169, 271, 300, 306, 315, 316 SPINICUTA 4 casei | eo oie ease toe 42
MICTOCISCUB: 24-4 So aeees eee eeEe 39, 42, 52 Apiniferas 5-2 scse ses sss -ee nes eee 37, 44
milberticss-scc--5- ws tes 39, 44, 48, 49, 51, 53 spinipinna..-26 << s~.<sacetommennsevewe 49
Vary Ciprachiatass.-ker= 2 sae 28 sub 6s ss5. 555 35 Chet tc caer 51
millerts. 22 Sees] sce: S86 saa eee 33 tanner ..262s2assen35ccsho eee 51
monacanthasecse sens as seas see 49 tenellaisse sic. aaa le demalaacte ane 43, 55
HAO) 2) Ue ace OOM Mere BODREOSOacaoA OAc 50 LONE A ns cc cacti arene Uae eae Sean alee 49
MOLOCCANG 2.2 =< 2452252 5ee2sss5se ee eee 43, tenuicirra..........- not ate ieee 43
90, 120, 122, 123, 300, 315, 316, 339 femniipinine Ae occas 002 2 ER 49
miultiradiata sess: = s22es +5 scteeeee ee 42 TeRsOURt.. ccs asccs as saeacese-e eee 44
INU GSP Nees eee ee eee eee 42, 45 tuberculatassc--cvet cceersccsoowacenteee 45, 52
MINAS sess ase passes Soa sion eee e 49 TID EXONS sem aoe enone ame tae 42
MeMAtoOdON=.case sae scce assis ones 48 Walidas fo. se so. ena ctewe ease eee meee s 42
OCCU tas. 5556 ons ots cas eet eanleee 45 VEIT PIMA a se atte elias ee 38, 44, 51, 53
Oke@llivs2 =< s.¥e22%2 secsdnqseee caste 54 PWAFUBPINA’ J. 522. poe Jeter Meteo 50
OMIA £4 F225) Szccsascieees concer eee 55 VVIGATIAG stem Reses ons Sara\ec «(seca eee 50
OXVACANUNASS ec osee= soe cinc eae 49 WILIBODT 208 ia-i an isioisiar dynein aa eee 47
palmatasese -9 eee eces eae ee 45, 49, 53, 54, 55 WOOG-MASODM 5... <2<- es Senesese eee 50
iin obs aeceeeeceraaabonoSsocasoscad! 44 | Anited onid te-.=--(o=-< meena eee 33, 116,
PAVE pINNAs. 2 == eee eee ee eee ee 43, 54 234, 242, 248, 289, 312, 330, 331, 378, 380
PAW dee see ee ee ate es eel eee Bil. || Amted oninse..s2us422.90s eee nemo 18, 254, 325
pAtWlasa sana seen eee ee eer 44 | Amthedones. <5. 20s se eee sens eerie ae 35
Pers plOsh oases eee eae er 87,44, 49 | *AvOiidwv...-- ---..- 65 s00ss cece sees eeeenes 35
petasus. .... 21, 31, 32, 43, 56, 165, 300, 315, 316 | Anthometra..............--- 266, 271, 304, 330, 380
PhsiaNp IMS. s 55 se=reee eee eee ASi5D S24 | Aplocrinus==-27-ces.. eens ee sae 212, 213, 214
PlONORNS:.-'<55< 2220-5555 ee 37, 39, 43 parkinsoni-...c¢<:s5-e.sessnsennaneeee 352
ISOLLOC tes = oe eee cieeeiete aici aint 45 | Arachnocrinus bulbosus............-.----- 358
OUNtA CB eneae owe a oe cea mece ome oe 44 | arachnoides, Stiremetra........-..-.------ 239
pourtalesit? <= 2% 2 se casc st ogeneemee $6 | Arbacia stellata... 5. 5 ..<n2-<-ece seen e sacle 127
INDEX.
Page.
archeriwWallisnongia::......2s2sseses cee. 35
armata, Analcidometra................. 34, 44, 293
PAGHUECLON ea reeiloeci cise el ee Ie 34, 44
articnlata,Antedon.......... aceon. soe: 39, 45
Womans Soe ee iain ee 33
(Clecto) ast sesoc 2 oe ee 31
Liparometra............ Sas 31, 33, 39, 45
aspera Nrichometra..-ll...2..-.-... 243, 307, 329
asperrima, Florometra............. 93,243, 307, 371
BSS LACUR mere mcnee one cic hi Seek iy. Ne pee eow DLOO)
BBCI a LSOCTINUS. = 2522222 -sch ec tetas 33, 119
Aetering sects so eS! 7, 23, 24
DoIdaitnsseen och eset ecco cce cen see 23
GOCRENOMUB! © 58 Sacco sis sceicie tewlemiaes 23
MAP AGIALAseeane ie ace ee ae ec 23, 24, 25, 29, 30
(Capillaster) multiradiata.............. 23
PDOCUMALM Seen Saas os cine age eee 23, 24, 30
PENS desea se ceen ie ccels cece cee 24, 27, 30, 32
PAS LGRD INC Ulaise ermal sme e mnie eisai ee 244, 246,
268, 274, 277, 292, 304, 308, 325, 328, 375
BOCL Dane ec ieee = niciewccin eee ccmecees cle 81
lonpicltrarreseeer ese ee Coe ea eeae 42
macropoda.......-- 155, 235, 267, 268, 295, 363
TaG ye ooothescaonsposesee sas ob one 268
PUNTA Cee ee ce aaseciinc coaster 17
PASS GEO PON eee aero te state atone eee ele 22
Melecrimid ssee yet ee ee gece 84, 110,
115, 116, 230, 234, 242, 248,
254, 289, 302, 304, 312, 379
Atpelegrimussessese ess = mie «sei = === -20;07,, 40,42,
117, 121, 250, 254, 318,
320, 345, 346, 348, 378
SNOMIAIUS! tenes ae see ciete Selec 302, 319
palanord este ser ec a aciciciseie aa -)aterotel= 34, 37, 42
193, 243, 311, 315, 318, 321
OTILEM AA eee ee cee crore te eteie te 65, 243, 311
CUIDEDAIB SRSA oooh ccs ee acer ee tees 37, 42
BD een em one a ae weenie enn 37
RUGS eee eat alate sere ere 192
wyvillii... eer 387, 42, 193
atlantica, Reromniila’ et eo eiyeet 46
atlanticus, Eudiocrinus......-.---------- 38, 42, 55
Pentametrocrinus....-.------------ 38, 42, 55
Atopocrinus.......--------- 110, 254, 318, 329, 348
SN ORF3 ooo ceces Bea aS eSeCeReeeeeesbes wee.)
audouini, Tropiometra...----------------- 38, 44
australis (1), Antedon.....-.-------------- 38
(2), Antedon..........---------------- 43
IBTCHITII EEE ee cee coe ce aca see =i 28
balanoides, Antedon....------------------- 44
ATL ClECHInTISte hase e seen eae Seles cei 34, 37, 42,
193, 243, 311, 315, 318, 321
Balanometra.....------------ 44
393
Page.
Balanonietra se sesse sce enone eee 243, 304, 308
bslanoidés-\2...222--s-0 -. 2. ae 44
Darbatetsse2 25224200 0: 5 2s bo ee 22
Comatula. sf 02 c2k5.. Seer ee 27
A eKGKVE LOG se <i xmas clos oe a ee 22
basicurva, Antedon............. ac a POO re ee 42
Charitometrass<:cc.--.-tooce eee 42, 367
Basicurva group....................- 41,42, 51, 54
bassett-smithi, Antedon.................-- 50
Bathycrinus......... 99, 202, 210, 212, 213, 318, 345
PACHICUB?: 22 <2 san -2. Le 63
Bathymetra tcc scer-4 ane teees 52 ee eDAnOOd: 378
QDYSEICOla. Clee Scece ce were ask ee 43
DreVvicitrayssicccss5 5502 vs se eee 311
carpenteri. 52-6. 3. sew oS poe eee 43
IMinutissima-..-Jss0e setae ee SLT
Pathymetrmnres-. 0. sesso ee a a eee See 254
bella; “Amtedon=ss-. cock e seas - oo eee Gee 48, 54
Cenometrass 22225 55s: ste ess eee 48, 67
var. brunnea, Aetteden Daven eth eee 48
belli, Actinometra.s-s.cesssee eee e eee ee 47, 52
Comaster. . - 47, 51, 52, 236, 238, 266, 339
bengalensis, aiden sae excrete nouee 48
Meterometra 2 s.2.5-42 esse eee ee 48, 54
bennetti, Actinometra.........-- 37, 38, 47, 50, 52
Alectorse cca 2. 222 cc eee 28, 29, 50
Comanthus. . ee fee 14.
22, 23, 95, 29, “31, ‘33, 37, 38, 47,
50, 52, 119, 229, 231, 234, 238, 240
Comatulae. ic. caticac ssc ee tee eee 31, 33
bicolor; Comatnlacecect spare ccceeee ae eee 30
bidenswAntedons se. ee eee eer we leseeee 39, 44, 52
bifida wANPEM ON sce cs seca = see ree meee Zi,
22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31, 33, 38,
43, 55, 56, 69, 90, 118, 119, 120, 121,
123, 167, 196, 217, 219, 233, 251, 271,
294, 300, 315, 316, 320, 321, 322, 325,
326, 333, 334, 335, 339, 340, 347, 369
iNstenias sto csisocnce- 2 coe aes 23
bigradata, Antedon....................-.- 51
(Peath yromeita coese~ osc a- ose se ee 51
bimaculata, Antedon............--.------- 37, 45
Michrometrass. cso. =. a ee ae eee Oe 37, 45
bipartipinna, Antedon..........--.------- 38
bispinosa, Antedon...........------------- 42
Thalassometra.= - .. <=. -s= 04 < aoe ee 42
blakei, Actinometra ...........---.--.---- 46
Boltenifiic<<cocvs =n oe et SaeUe Speers US
Bopyrilica. Mee 126
borealis, Pachylometra JA cee ee eee 299
Psathyrometra......----------------- 176, 241
borneensis, Actinometra........--.-...----- 46
Comatula (Actinometra)....-.....------ 35
394 INDEX.
Page. Page.
Bathmocidaris. <>. . s<5.5,00/eaceanosmneemers 178 | carinata, Tropiometra....................- 25, 30,
Bourpueticrinids. _-...5..-02-.-.042 198, 208, 345 31, 32, 34, 37, 38, 44, 50, 54, 125
Bourpueticrimus:... 5. sat c/s uch semen 722429222 | cariiiiera, Siinametra....°.-. =... genes 159
bowers, Nanometra--...2.--+.+..ssees 269, 307 | carpenteri, Antedon.............:2......- 39, 43
brachiolata, Actinometra..........--...... 45, 49 Bathymotra........ <<...) -- 55s sees 43
Gomattla. <<. -e n= - eae eee 25, 29, 31, 32 Oligometra... 2... J.2 02 eee 39, 43, 51
@omatulella..- 25.2 24.525 eee 272, 292, 298 | Carpenterocrinus. ...........-.---.2-.-- 208, 210
brevicnra; Antedon.----.---2-- seen oe 50 | Catoptometra........... 117, 284, 286, 296, 308, 378
Bathymetra.--....-.<.aeSeSckt - stent ke nartiawbieess: = 3502. 253, 283, 329, 359
brevicuneata, Antedon...................- 45) 49 || Gardina califormiche-- 25 = - se. Seenene eee 127
brevipinna, Amtedon -.- 2... = 2... <6 ee 44 planapetura.- += ./--\s2n-\..ucdeeaeeee 127
Comatulas 9225-22 c lances sence odie 34 | celtica, Leptometra... 43,55, 177, 243, 303, 305, 369
Crinometra..2 2.3 2-22 nn. eee ob;4e ||| Gonomettas. = 22 saan eee 106, 285, 291, 300, 302, 306
Brevipinna proup=---% 2-502 no eee 54 DOHA 2escmehcce se seeaaeee - 48, 67
breviradia, Antedon----.c-.--2455--eeneen 42 PLUNNEATS 20 esos ee ee 48
Htiremetra soo) genie ccs «eS 42, 365 Commute: 3325. See eee eee ee 51
DRMAreus. 52. Sas 5 is 52 a snes ee ee 39 EMeENdAatIK sso 6..2 sce see ee 50
IACHINOMOUTA=. . << <ccen'cnes visi aeeeee 47 herd Man 50-5. eee Sa eee 54
(Antedon’. = //-225 255 0- decent tees 39 UWUILCOMIS: |. sc. c2eccncsw cs nas coe SNeRD
Comantheria).!2< 5. Aaseeenk ose 39, 47, 49, 51 | chadwicki, Comissia................-..--- 54
brockii, Antedon.. cance cnSeeeeetses 48 Prometranc oss -tee eens eee ee ee 54
brunnea, Antedon ela Wal. -j<-2--,-- eee 489\ Oharitometra. ..<2.s.2aaces sence a Beene 248
Cenometra....:. 2... -..... Baye eee 48 ipadieunvas! Gee iso 2 rade 42, 367
brunnum, Caput-Meduse...............-... 22,23 INICIRAs\; sacescnece ee see e se RE Ee Ou
bulbosus, Arachnocrinus................-.- oo8.,|| \Charitometrids:-...c2o. eho. se eee eeeee 78, 98,
Bythocrinus conifer..............2--2----- 203 115, 232, 234, 242, 244, 246, 248, 285, 286, 289,
intermediuss. 2....<-%.-,.55- see 205 290, 292, 306, 308, 312, 319, 328, 329, 330, 377
Galamioerinus?;.1 82 98. Se IS ee ee 208, 210, 345 | chinensis perlegens, Stella................. 722)
californica; Candinax .22: / <2. 252... --25- ee 1277|(Ohlorometra- 228: ee. bees eon nee meena
callista, Calometra.—o. ..-. 2... 2.2. 5 cee ee 293 ACILeRR Sc cob cece wecewoee cone 43
Galometra callista: 29-5222... --sseeeeee eee 293 TOMUSLAE eee sche ceee te eee eee 239
Giscold ea: <- -5= 5 = sooner Ota 43 WUPOSAS Pass Sicle woe ls ce eins cweeee eee 160
separata Meciec acts Nomads abc eee 293, 329 | cinereum, Caput-Meduse...............-.- 22, 23
Calometrideet: ae 222 S82 28s PP ao 5. ee 78, | \clarss; Amtedon:.-.cccis< scene - eee 48
98, 115, 234, 242, 243, 312, 328, 341, 370 Petasometen 222. se oon eee 48
caponisis, /Antedone te seh. 242 2886 soe: 54) Cleloarinies.. 5-5-2). se see cee ee eens 362
Gapillasters¢ 1422 Atk O58 ee 80, 112, 240, 266, 296 | clemens, Antedon....-......-.-....------ 45
eoecodistomak.s. $s is gee. 46 | coccodistoma, Capillaster............--..-- 46
macrobrachius..........-.... 49, 234, 238, 240 | Coccometra.................-..- 289, 302, 304, 326
MATIC 32 32 5-c poe aecee os ee 46, 277 guttata...-..--...----..-----+----+-- 299
multiradiata....... 14, 22, 23, 25, 31, 33, 35, 38, hagenii.-....-..-...- 34, 44, 299, 329, 331, 369
39, 46, 49, 50, 51, 53, 54, 81, 266, 277 SE ROL EN aa Bo, ag?
Benton oe: <eee e 25, 81,33) 98; 48,58, 266 | Colobometra----. --- a 2D; Ae eacane
@apillastering.............webadse a 78 es: RENEE Tita eae aeteg “Gap
Gppat-Meduss....2..-... amine ee BEA cetacean ars
Pe ee 22,23 | Colobometride..........--2-+-+-++- 116, 117, 234,
CHERAU M022 - a <2 2 ate 2228 242, 243, 254, 284, 296, 300, 312, 328, 329
caput-meduse, Pentacrinus............... 33 | columnaris, Antedon...........-.---+-se+- 37, 44
caribbeus, Monachocrinus............--- 203, 205 Zenometra..........-- 37, 44, 220, 241, 243, 301
Carinata, Alecto.:..../.. sseseuee Reese 24°!) Gomactinia «<2 =cacnicctos oe 117,
Aiitadone Ave ee 37, 38, 44, 50, 54, 55 238, 240, 266, 268, 296, 298, 335, 336, 339
GComatula. 2 /- 22 ieee 24, 25, 29, 30, 32 echinoptera.ctt. 22h okt ce ee ee eee 29,
(Alecto))"..--2-.-Ceesa ee eee 31 31, 32, 46, 129, 249, 281, 291, 298, 325, 355
INDEX.
Page.
Comactinia meridionalis.. 34, 46,315, 317, 321, 326
Comactiniine.....22...54.: 266, 280, 284, 289, 298
CGOMAN ENEMAS ee: 5, <\-)5)5\s1nisesow nk SUNN 14, 330
BUIDOLMANS aera syocrarayateiawsi carne sere 37, 47, 229
[SRIAROUS Bee cee aterceinsciaiaigerer tse 39, 47, 49, 51
Prandical ys 155.5005 sssanacsst eee 38, 47
MAPMINCA Esse oes, q55-\ss ceuoaseeen ee 47
POlyGNeMUs =.) 5 524.02. 5-5025082 234, 238, 266
Gomianb nina seeteys -ciserceeicio mola sae 14, 330
pehlevelt 25. 25ss-aes0n2s 14, 37, 39, 47, 49,
51, 52, 53, 225, 227, 229, 236, 238, 266, 339
@omanthus.,........... 25, 71, 240, 286, 296, 306, 330
annulata.- - ...... 38, 46, 47, 52, 54, 135, 238, 266
bONNettless=) 2. as acinw nates. eee 14, 22,
23, 25, 29, 31, 33, 37, 38, 47, 50, 52, 119, 229,
231, 234, 238, 240, 266, 282, 292, 330, 358
JAPONICA Hs soe 29, 31, 33, 37, 47, 52, 118
parvicirra ...........2.... 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 38,
39,46,49, 50, 51, 52, 54, 118, 120, 125, 223, 231,
233, 236, 238, 251, 281, 286, 292, 321, 351, 357
pinguis. ..-. 93, 118, 229, 231, 234, 238, 281, 292
PAINIOAN Marsa oc (opai5 a\oichnicrais;oewicoie eee 46, 49
BS LG peeeey ad = Sato fer cjeteroraicrers oi stormnan eee 118, 134
trichoptera...... 31, 32, 47, 81, 85, 118, 238, 281
Man PEro ara 12\sa'saaaes 81, 33, 54, 223, 315
@omasters..=.----- 28, 30, 50, 113, 240, 292, 296, 330
el eee cise crs 47, 51, 52, 236, 238, 266, 339
distincta....... - 46, 50, 275
ATTIGIGOBUBE as aescca ce tao Soe sere "7B, 251, 266, 357
DETACH IBMPEE Ee hays taxa ceee oe 49, 52, 53
MAGEE DLAC HIALAs a;-1e oo 30.0.1 oe « 46, 51, 85, 266
multifida......... 25, 29, 31, 33, 39, 47, 52, 339
MAM Grad IANS sao awae oe siawiniaecne See 33
noveguiner............- 29, 31, 33, 37, 46, 325
Ha POR senor ca cciis= <)a21a 4 ssimacneeee® 34, 37,
39, 46, 49, 51, 52, 120, 234, 238, 240, 266, 339
Womasterids. =. ...<.-'2-<-<12-- = 33, 64, 69, 72, 74, 76,
84, 85, 90, 92, 94, 96, 97, 100,102, 104, 108,110,
111, 112, 113, 115, 117, 118, 120, 121, 152, 154,
156, 232, 234, 237, 238, 240, 242, 254, 290, 292,
294, 296, 312, 325, 328, 329, 330, 343, 377, 379
(GOMisaabeLUn se are ss a arse oo -=ieia wie Pare ele 266, 270
comata, Zygometra..-.-.-...-- 48, 253, 283, 329, 359
(Carine ae 14, 77, 240, 296, 378
THIACTI VGN ee oa ai=ai- ele) = 46, 49, 51, 52, 220, 353
Mpa close se rqane ses: 46, 247, 277, 325, 353
stelligera...... 46, 48, 49, 50, 51, 54, 81, 247, 353
@omatiliagsssc6-55- 2 = 102, 240, 296, 336, 339, 370
iridometriformis ...-...------ 238, 240, 249, 355
Comatula.. 23 . 14, 24, 25,
26, 29, 30, ‘31, “33, 113, “240, 296, 298, 330, 378
MU GOTEE NES Ao oes e esas sas eoneOneL, oe
ANN WAtaAs-- e code aseen es hsstese ess 27
395
Page.
Comatula articulata:.....:2--:2s<-s02--0" 33
batbitas..sss22255 ssccscssae eee 27
bennetils2-.se.22 55 Sh 2 sts ee 31, 33
bicblorsceisseeccdes dc eee eee 30
brachiolata.-. 2.223 a 25, 29, 31, 32
brevipinns: 62. .5-+2<.22-45- See 34
Carinataics.<.s55sec08 seas 24, 25, 29, 30, 32
coraling ssc aitstaccee $c 2. 27
CUMING a5. 2562-8 ese neee eae 31
echinoptera::- 2:22.55 222 Bees 32
elonpatar.cisdc58 Fess 5 5ae ee = 31, 33
eschrichtil':.3<6: 3...25 Se 32
etheridgei:..<-.2..-.562 see sence 131, 298
fimbriata..< <5 <.2.<Gcercnrsee 25, 26, 29, 33
flagellata.s. =<. .<. 5225.4 See ees. 31, 33
Hhagenlls.2: <2c0ccksiss bens s Aen 34
INGICA. s25.c5sa5Sseninnssee eet nee eres 36
jacquinotiz-cesesccccebecute eee 30, 31, 32
japonicas ==. .ccstivewweste see se 31, 33
levissimas ...5.2-42t.22 cee eee 35
leucomelas;..:\. .22-4-3:.. Sees 28
MACKONCMA-. <2 vices seceeeneeeeones 30° 31883
mediterraness.s -=.7-5c2cskeusee ae 25, 27, 30
Merigionalis..s. <<. cccacseue sso heen = 33
IMCTLONSL sa) Saie7 the Seek omeek eee ee 35
Micrastel scc<cie oe seeosas Sees aes 75, 234, 298
Milberti-cs. <scocc55s2cteeeasteece =e 32
Miller s.scieins ose ace eres eee ee ee 31
multifidasiecssss2 2253 sscneeacet eee ee 31, 33
multiradiata... 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 50, 119, 330
NOViS-P UME s 25 soto owoe ae eee eee 31, 33
PALVICITAs oases oe eee eee eee eee 33
Pechinhtassacct <p ess= ee ecee ee eee 23,
31, 33, 39, 45, 49, 51, 52, 75, 79, 81, 83,
220, 249, 281, 298, 321, 325, 351, 355
petasus. -..- 232.2 -e-smsn ns aenoe- <= 32
phalangium(:< <<: 22<>=<e=ee=s=====-—6 32
philiperti--<-.222.- ete ree eee eee 31, 32
purpurea........--------------------- 32,
45, 51, 75, 132, 221, 225, 228, 236, 238, 266, 298
TOY DAUCIees onc ceee= === =e = $2
TOYMAUA ii. sone steerer 30
rosacea... 27
TOROA Le std ee see eee d Siac weet 31, 32
rotalarig.s sse.0.cssskasacoeeecceoee ees 25,
31, 33, 39, 46, 51, 52, 221, 223,
233, 238, 249, 298, 321, 326
POIBIKes cosa ss acccet gc cten See. 32
BAVIPN Yds nnio.- +o ee eae eta 33
simplexwes-ciccsswee =o see eee nae 37
BOIAKIN oc Fioe2s Ecce oe ee oe ee eee 25,
31, 32, 33, 34, 38, 39, 45, 49, 52,
118, 220, 249, 298, 326, 351, 355
3896 INDEX.
Page Page.
Comaitila,; ep. w22. oss sc 03 Saad stioeblode ads 26) coralina.Comatula:. 32: -- 72 epese eee eee 27
ToBROIIA A. canis care cere seins on ee 31, 32 | cornubiensium, Decempeda......-....--..- 22, 24
WMOMONBIN 3<> =< 4)- Ss ease eee $133 ||| (comuvta: |\Cenomotra. «0-4 <422.526 42= See 51
fruehin ters: 2sce 2520... on S0/91, 92 || Gommiometrac. .s)o--- p42 4coe eee 246, 277, 308
(Actinometra) borneensis.......-.-.--- 35 CONNOR ao ec canna ee 49, 239
hamata: <2. -.<ss.-+2 ch oceans 34 CTASSLCUTAS «<< <,-/5 0.5, /o0e see 297
Totalaria <2 5..2)-¢ soso. 23.52554- Ree 31 Gelicatan. <5 fo0< tec sch acinsae eee ee 297
SOLANA Ls «on oe yeaa sel atewieeetee 31 WOOUMBAONI 22... <,</e/- «.<i-tna, acl See 50
wahlberpil. 2.5.2... sce. seeeets ee $1 | Craspedometra. .... <<. - --ncanence ee 300, 304
(Alecto) articulata...........-s--ss2s2 31 SANA CUTA AE <a a s)a cere <n EE 38,
CANITIARR ac ye ae ee 31 45, 48, 52, 139, 253, 292, 328, 329, 361, 375
echinoptera. <. -(/-)-.c)-\s2 saelansiete 31 amboinsetao. Ke Io eos ear es 48
eschrichtit: .- 2.22.0 s- 2 seem aee $1 | crassicirra, Cosmiometra...-......-...-.... 297
fimbriatas.c.c2s sch scso0 = ceeeeee $1! |crasstpinna, Antedon\.-5- 2-25-14 asco eee 48
mediterranes:. ~.<::s-.=.<sseteacs 31 | crenulata, Amphimetra.......... 38, 39, 44, 45, 51
mil berths 2.2 -ues anc 5 gaa see 31 Asitedon.. 525. 03% 08S. De othe 38
multiradiata --<.--...2--22-<ssaeee 31 | Crinometra..............-...-..- 248, 278, 328, 378
palmatas.-e-nccece sa -jcce eee 31 breyipinals . C8 os. arractansipas= 2 See 34, 36, 44
PALVICUTS os 35. tiae ess sae 31 COnciInna esse. bees eee aeee eee 239, 367
DetaRIse oo ewes et cone ee eee 31 pranuliferds. 348. 354.58 Seu. es. See 36, 44
phalangium: « <<. 2 25 -+ cee 31 IM bricatasts £5. See Ss. Bok, «nam SO 36, 45
POVDAU GI 2 a1 5 on oon Si) | Cko@ea, AekGiws [to <<... =. elena eee 22
SATA S356 s5.02sesc03 Cap eee 21) || Grotalometras. ==. =-s—- ease 246, 308
SAVIO. aos. ccna cicicte cee 31 fidvals t= 4 12: SA. See seen acces eee 52
Comatuladse sie 2S oc eece kee coe i ee 27 DOA GTH CHT Oe <a ang <5'mcin sensi 54
Gomptules ooo o non cesses se caese= aa 24, 25 POW Cte cram np eee 45
Gomatulellas o-oo. 3. 00-2 ees eee 296, 378 | cubensis, Antedon...-....-..-..----.-- 34, 37, 44
brachiolata.........-...----..--- 272,292, 298 tele cuits <A ae eee 37, 42
G@omatulidie ccs o eee asc soc ce 40 | cumingii, Actinometra............--------- 39
Gomatnuilidess fe2a2. 8-82. 8... eee 266, 296 Gomatila: <1 -2-2csa5 acts acne eee 31
MECAMEFOSS {2 = <5 o36-5260555 5 Beer 195)|\Gyclometraze..-—--->= -.<s9-4 =e eS
WOMIDIA: sores ces see ese sea eee 240 | Cyllometra......--.-.-.---- 285, 302, 306, 374, 375
Comisst ae. eco oss se ces Sackeceod 238, 240, 296 albopurpurea-....-.<.. <<. 5. teens 200)
Chad wickin 2. sus. 2 ate ee 2 54 Giscifoxrmiss 505.5. -j.4.5-555- eee 363
GumMehimises je Sse eee a 83 TOA CA ae eee enter 54, 289, 374
APNOLA.. ems e wile Seo c See os RE 39 | cypris, Thaumatometra.............-...-- 43
DELETING 3 eee eh seen once eee 51 | decacnemus, Asterias..........--...-..---- 23
complanatus, Ilycrinus...............-..-.- 62 | decameros, Comatulides.......-.......--... 133
compressa, Antedon..........--.----.2ss0 Ady| Decametras: f62 7322 Sif -e)s eee ee 285, 302, 306
Parametrac: eu. sas. cee es este 44 InfoRmAis. SC as. Fe CED AE See Bae 44
(Gomppometia- fesse 2. 296, 298, 304, 326 TON = seen 2s Se ee eee eee ee
InGOmMMedAas-s2- <=. e ae 47, 173, 300 EEPLOD BCH Sete ein aii) 53
LOVED. 2 occ. Seise 3. ota sas ae eee 35, | Decametrocrinus.......-.....+2:.2-+--5--- 39, 54
39, 44, 174, 299, 300, 315, 317, 329, 369 | Decempeda cornubiensium.......-.....---- 22, 24
Serrata 22) ocak. obese See 299 | decipiens, Antedon.........-.....-....--.- 39
concinna, Crinometrass.-. <<. -0..-.2e- 239, 367 | decorus, Isocrinus...........-.....--- 120, 205, 330
congesta, Psathyrometra................... 94) || defecta, Antedon. 2: 2:)..2t-2e----.ceraas 44,307
conifer, Atelecrnus'.- =. 225-522 n-= 65, 243, 311 Eby pa lomo trees aaltepet 44
Bythocrinus........ EG otc cca eee 208 | Aexadacvaxtevoccdic .....--------22+22---2-- 21, 22
conifers, Amtedon)-..<-- - ccc o. woe -2ceeeee ZY) EA OGM pean see osososoSo8 ASsoge555+- 22
Cosminmetra....-.::.-- 22222-5002. 988 49, 239 Warbata 286-020. 35.38. Se Be oe Se 22
conjungens, Antedon..................---- 45, 48 (CROCORE qo fb stisesa4 eee eee eee 22
coppingeri, Actinometra.............-... 39, 46, 49 TOBACOR. ac soc Waae tee ao ee 22
INDEX,
= Page.
delicata, Cosmiometra.................----- 297
delicatissima, Mariametra...............-... 67
WETNOCIINTIASS 54S e em: Soke sck 208, 212, 318, 345
TER RON TIC eh Pol hal AER 203, 205
SPaeeetet asses eee aoe ee eee 205
WORE escck che ewcecdse ts eon teelee. 210
Gentatay Allectros:=-csc0s2.25 22st EE DT oe
Hathrometra..............-.- 56,309, 329, 373
denticulata, Amphimetra.................. 43
ITHCGOM Pee See che ccew coc sey tentoseee 43
dibrachiata, Antedon milberti, var... - 28
Michrometra:. 252-4. sess. 222 < Se 8 306
ImMAculata.o5.. 53... 37,45
Goderloini ese ee Mek er PITS 53
fiarellatar. s-fc<5-<.-.- 29, 31, 33, 37, 45, 49, 266
WAP NGILA Soci cscs scc-e ert 52
PME... a 287
EMULE ae eee ence os ciate tntcitoute en M200
difficilis, Paleocomatella.......... Seber’ 46
diomedez, Pentametrocrinus............- 187, 302
Perometra ....------ 65, 179, 307, 329, 349, 371
@isciformis) Antedon....:2.-.--2)J0ss022- = 45
Gyllometras------ == <== =e meee ee eee 363
discoidea, Actinometra.........-.-.-.----- 46
Amphimetra.......... 28, 39, 44, 49, 51, 235, 285
PATitedOWee ene ee nee te te sete 43
Onlometrastes sas ote nee tee asco or 43
discolor, Colobometra......-----.--------- 291
distincta, Actinometra.........-.-.-.-.--- 46
INTLCO OME ee ee cise eo oe nee ceiseee 45, 46
@omssterrseeee oe sere eee oe 46, 50, 275
ipachylometraccs.---6-ce r= ~~ o-- == 45
divaricata, Actinometra......-...---.----- 47,49
déderleini, Antedon.......----------------- 53
Wichrometrassees sae ee oan #B
dorsata, Stenometra........--------------- 237
dudenteAntedONeesss2c5-6 <--> -re oreo 43
diidenii, Antedon......-- 34, 38, 48, 90, 300, 316, 339
dumetum, Comissia..........--.----------- 83
duplex, Actinometra...-...--------------- 47,51
PARLE OD eae Seater eae aol 44
OT eOMe Li adee sae seme = a= = ole l= <iei ein 44
echinata, Antedon......-..-.------------- 42
IAL ARSOMMCLT Ass. see oe <= sees eae = 42
echinoptera, Actinometra...---------------- 46
INE CEM sence anne = aes cent aman ee ee
Comactinia +.-..--------------- 29,
31, 32, 46, 129, 249, 281, 291, 298, 325, 355
Womatulaccescs cc ce~s- == = 32
Comatula (Alectro)....----------------- 31
Echinoptera group.-------------+---------- 41,46
IBICHUTUN eee eae ae naee ln -na- 2s se Semi 7
300
397
Widriocrinus.5-22.2<< Aus... Cee eee eee "202
WM dominates - ct S26 cn. cececose eee 178
Mlepans group: sessees cee nde eee ee 48, 51
elepang}-Antedon. .....0--8-ccaseeeeeee 39, 48, 52
Zypometra: -- scceo dees ee 39, 52
Hleutherocrnoideas.. = -<=-.c eee ee 54
iMlewtherocrinus: -.osse ose a eee eee 54
elongata, Actinometra........---c2d05-soc- 46
Mette, 2235 testes Ie 29
Wintedon:t = cucccee.. fos ae 37, 45, 49
Comatulats.cct es. 2c 2s 31, 33
emendatrix, Antedon.........-....:.--.-- 50
Cenomietra-.2iic- <<. sec ee exe cee 50
nerinid ge’. eeece asa seers te Cae 98, 342
OM CTMUA: So ae 2 eae 5c one Sa ee 352, 354
australis. . sc. «St Seo 28
liliiformis:... 2.04.22. {6 ae 352
encrinus, Tropiometra...........------- 37, 38, 44
ndoxocrinus: = ss26e~- =2. Se 320, 378, 380
PAaITH; ewes eke os ce eee eee ee 20
ensifer, Amphimetra.... 141, 255, 285, 328, 329, 361
Hipimetta..t 22221 wsedrae osnestaeeootee 296
erninacea,"Antedonsssee= ce er se cane ne eee = 49
Oxymetira-s_2h=2 52S. sen eee eee ee 49
erythrizon, Psathyrometra...........------- 241
Prythrometra=2-2---= -+--=-=------= === 304, 308
piber’e ahh ose. ss che acs eoceseee 329, 371
Wechrichti proup=---------ee==--"— == 41, 43, 51, 52
eachrichti, Antedon......-..-.-----+2---2= 43, 55
eschrichtil, AlectO:2-2--5. 0.2222. see eee = 29
‘Amtedonet sees Seeks sae eee eres 53
GComintulass eee eee eee 32
(Mlecto) 293208225. o este 31
etheridgei, Comatula.....-....------------ 131
Mudiocrinuss. 0 ee een ate 26, 37, 38, 40,
42, 53, 64, 78, 85, 107, 110, 296, 308
atlanticusss222se-< ss ee ee eee 38, 42, 55
granulatus.......-------------++-+++-- 50
Wd ivihUB=22 25-22 e eee l= 37, 42, 50
japonicus.......---.--------++++++++--- 37, 42
jumceus......--.------+--++++++++-++-- 136
Ormatusee senses eee eee oe eee 253, 331, 359
pinnatus...--..-------++++++++2--++++- 137
gemperi....---- +--+ 22-222 2ee reer reese 37, 42
Varianhss-- eee sent es eee eet Seneens 37, 42
Eumorphometra hirsuta....---.----------- 43
Burocidaris nutrix......------------------ 127
europea, Alecto.....--------+++-++++----- 24
Neocomatella.......---.----=---+------- 46
| europzeus, Pentacrinus...--.--------------- 27, 28
exigua, Antedon....-...------++++++-+---> 43
Hathrometra:-....----<<=----=<-----<s 43
explicata, Trichometra.......-------------- 243
398 INDEX.
Page. Page.
exquisita, Iridometra.......2.----.-.-2-s-% 288 | granulifera, Antedon................- 36, 45
fieldi, Antedon..........---- soe wage seoe 50 @rinometra -S2222-- --e saa eee 36, 44
finbristarscsns esos =e opera eae 22 Paramletras 2 a.< <5 «2's avin ecisjans Sees 44
A Giinometra:c.55:/-sssa5--0 -eeee 46, 49, 50,53 | Granulifera group........-.....----- 41, 45, 51, 54
Comatila e222 e2 fee 25, 26, 29,33 | guttata, Coccometra...........-.-..-.---- 299
(Allecto)a5 3-2-2 - sseoeeeeeeneer 81 | eyges; Antedon: ~. . s2sc0cs-~-0asese eee 39, 45
Stellas. et eee eclec eos Sot a= eee 22 amprometra..~ <5. oc =-s2+eer ee 39, 45, 49
imbriata pTOUps-<-- 6-45-55 eee set 42,46. | hageni} Antedon....-. ...<---..0-ssPseseeits 44
fmschiivAntedoue..=-.-e--e eae eee 49") bagenit; Antedon......--<252astenee eee 53
Oxymetrases-=ses-e =. eee eee 49, 266 Coccometra.........-. 34, 44, 299, 329, 331, 369
fisheri,, Parametra 22. 9-¢-2-2-----42-Ree eee 297 Comatula .\J22-sisas-debcsaee ose enewaere 34
Aarellata;Alectos-.----. =) meskes ee 29 | hamata, Comatula (Actinometra)........... 34
ANTEAONE Lene eee eo eee ae 37, 45,49, 52 | hartlaubi, Catoptometra. ....... 253, 283, 329, 359
Comatulascs 222 5-2ec scscsteiely sane see ae 31,33 | Hathrometra.... 124, 211, 228, 236, 250, 254, 304, 308
Dichrometra..-....-.-- 29, 31, 33, 37, 45, 49, 266 Gentatadack =bS-E8 < e<en..oacele 56, 309, 329, 373
var. afra, Dichrometra. .......-------- 52 OXIQUAL Jo cecec tem css se peace eee oaeE ss 43
fliiva “Anted ont oe encsn: -e-c 5 ntsc ceieeaaee 52 Prolixa.< cu: ssscecsec 43, 55, 300, 315, 317, 329
Crotelometra.<..¢- 25+. a:tenmiaasead 52 sarsii........- 31, 32, 120, 273, 288, 309, 315, 317
flavomaculata, Antedon...........-.---.-- 50 Bue sees ee eee eee eee eee 43, 55
fexilisAntedonses. sccm. acs sees 43, 44 tenella. 52... <. suse eusedsideets - ZahbBaoe)
Pachylometrasé: 223. .25. sjJa-eetapeses 43,44 | hawaiiensis, Naumachocrinus...........- 201, 203
lorometrassesssee eee reae eee eeaeeeee 51, 234, Thalassometra:... |<<: = asstkebec--mere 237
966,271, 304,,326;,.880)3%5),980! | lelicidse= 22.5022. -22 2c 2252-2 - eee 212
SSpEMA se eee esos 93, 243, 307, 371 | Heliometra ............ 124, 234, 250, 254, 266, 271,
magellanica.........+.--+.-++: 38, 43, 51, 294 304, 308, 326, 329, 330, 378, 380
TAPAS Ao oe NS xis eae eee 269 PARGT TE) S Sepeceeisc/ 3993 569285592-0- 23 29, 31,
RONNEN hs coo ec elooem acest ec EOE 51 32, 38, 43, 53, 55, 57, 125, 307, 371, 373
Auctuams /Antedon.-----5c--4--4se eee 42 MAXIMA: =. .062--2 506s = oct ewsae eee 307
Rorheslocrimus = 21. sce secs dass oe eee ee 194 | Heliometrine’: 25-2 oo eee 78, 254, 380
fragilis, Psathyrometra.........-- 241, 301, 369, 375 | herdmani, Cenometra...........-.......... 54
fruticosus, Comaster............-- 73; 2D L266, S07) | SELCURTOMOULR sem ame es ale aim imi = ame ee 306
Ganymede. cases jane eee ae a eee 24 SHENG: <5 sinacio sin. s och cle eee 48
UlchelAre seta ase eee eee 24, 28 bengalensise.<,. << 26s ecos nse pe ae 48, 54
Gephyrocrinuses seo o)ee = mesma ania 208, 210, 345 quinduplicava. ..... 45, 235, 253, 292, 359, 375
gigantea, Thalassometra............. 239, 246, 297 ‘reynaudii.......... 31, 32, 45, 54, 255, 361, 375
glacial: Crowes -na-fagoee ee teeceaccees 57 AVI pREN SCAR a eee 28, 29, 31, 33, 45, 54
ATOCTO Sais iote s aic.ste wise sic = mss Seictgemctslep $9) | Gb berntilivs). sees ose nil oo cece pace 27
(Heliometra) 22i-72,< <= 24 see oo ee eee 27, | SEiMerom etra-e eee ees = eee Ree ees 23, 306
Heliomotras: 2A ece 2 aco eee eee 29, 31, martensi..... 48, 65, 253, 285, 328, 329, 359, 375
32, 38, 43, 53,55, 57, 125, 307, 371, 373 OWING coc cyte niece ia ae ea 273, 285
Glyptomotra. : «2-22 -d5----202 3s eee 248 robustipinna...:...-.-.-.--.... 37, 47, 48, 50
Jnperalinir a 505 fee oe tein 299 BOL coe ene nn oo win ne esos emesis 53
TIMOTOTALS ee ae eee Ree epee ae 162 | Himerometride ........ 116, 117, 234, 242, 243, 254,
uberosa see 2 929 A, Wiss Ay le oe 42 291, 300, 312, 325, 326, 328, 329
Golafussiae -: ee re oe as ee BO hirsuta, -Amted Onis mits sails attains aren 43
gorponin, "Antedonses sec eaceu seers aoe 24,118 Eumorphometra........--...-..------- 43
gracilis, Actinometra ...............--.-.-- 49 | Holopus............-.------- 16, 200, 204, 344, 346
Parte Ones ke ce 2) LOO UNNI D seen c enters oie cate ene 7
Comaster..........-- acinar eee 4952, 53 | Homalocrinus------.--.---.-2--2.2-----.-- 174
grandicalyx, Actinometra............... 88, 47,52 | Horeeometra...---./.----- 22 ee 246
MOMAMENETIA = .o'to5 cae sase sensei te ane 38, 47 Cuplens 22 eee ce eee Scectae eee 44
granulatus, Eudiocrinus...........-.....-.- DD) SROREROS A LOCGO setae ae are eetaeea oie 24, 25, 26
INDEX.
- Page.
hupferi, Antedon............... 38, 43, 49, 300, 316
Hyoerinus..........-...-..- 208,210,316, 344, 345
ty palockinuss\s= sMissse Jsbode 32228. e 2 286
Hypalometras ei jsIshse koe eS es 304, 308
elec tamet ec eet as Ha me See 44, 307
ty ponomeisarsil = -<ssne= 2-20 oS 34
IV SUREXPAMLEGOD a rao2. SERINE 285 Lh 2e 43
Wehthyoerinidse sos 8 5. ocase eee 332
APO My COMISSIA sooh o's 32 aio Ee 39
MEV CrERUSMES eee a2 sii edirs eo aoe nate 345
Complanatuss. Hs - cose desc a-c32 62
imbricata, Crinometra. ........2 2252225... 36, 45
imparipinna, Antedon.........-- 38, 45, 49, 52, 54
imperialis, Actinometra...............-- 29, 31, 33
tmipinnata: Antedon = s..25--5-2-5+- Pssst 44
dusequalispAntedone A.%)....0 G2 seelve nate 45
Ipachwlome tras mica <<) acy ose 45, 367
IncenrtaeA plaometra-- << .0.st-00 snk Yeee 42
JST 7 2X6 00) Sn oe a 42
A CIRAMPAMILOGOD Soe sae «sss scien sins ote’ 42
Wharitometran.. sci ccicncia)-— erase eee 42, 367
mcoOnIMoOdsa,wANtedon. - << <== -)--\- Jee seem 47
Compsometra..-.-- 2/222. .a225 525 47, 173, 300
indica, Antedon-.....---..-.--.----- 45, 52,53, 54
omintu laser ee eee mice aane 36
Stephanometra.......-..------- 36, 45, 53, 54
MITOPLONIC ME ar wm = oe iainin lai! tee = asa l= 44, 54
indivisus, Eudiocrinus............------ 37, 42, 50
@pliocrinus=-- 2... --s2--eer eee eee 37
(Gndiocrinus)=,2---- ease =e = = 34
informis, Antedon...--...-.---------:-+--- 44
[Wecametraeacs see a2 ame eeeee 44
inopinata, Antedon......---.----------+--- 50
insignis, Antedon..-.. 39
insolitus, Nemaster 247, 279, 353
insperatus, Pontiometra...-.-.------------ 77
intermedia, Actinometra......--.--------- 39
intermedius, Bythocrinus....-------------- 205
inusitata, Psathyrometra.......-...------ 242, 245
jiowensis, Actinometra.-..-.....-------------- 53
Ie ASS HED M ese eyes ele aoe taie = me e-ln =) 53
ridometras.a.-----=.-ss--<~ =~ 254, 296, 302, 304
sepyptica......-------------22---2--0°- 54
Oxquisita.....-\..-.5. 22-222 -se ee sees 288
PARTE ete ee creer toe cette Mtalelaraaaeie ee 49, 266
parvicirra......-.-------------++-+++°- 44
iridometriformis, Comatilia...... 238, 240, 249, 355
irregularis, Antedon.......---------------- 39
FSOCMINUSe ue eels os - =< - =i 2 2 = 86, 210, 310, 380
MBLEDIA See ea ee ao ei=aini“'= ole em ietm mee 33, 119
GCOLUBS. ec oe = s~ ews == = elm 120, 205, 330
RCM HU eet ae o cele =lalaris 21-2) 254
angustipinna...-.---------------+---- 43
399
c ry Page.
Jacquinoti, Amphimetra.................- 31, 32
Comatula...2-.0-2-5. ease 30, 31, 32
japonica, Actinometra..................--- 37, 47
ATS CEO Sec tsé <2 55 si oob anette eee 29
Antedons :=)-3.. -...2-:2/3<..sce eee 49
Comanthus..........- 29, 31, 33, 37, 47, 52, 118
Comatula: «5 <90,095< Sec.cie oo ee ee 31, 33
Oligometras....<s+s<<co-0% cae ees eee 49
japonicus, Eudiocrinus..............------ 37, 42
Pentametrocrinus.. 37, 42, 93, 302, 311, 329, 373
jJoubini> Promachocrinus. ---.---eeuseeee ee 55
jukesii, ‘A ctinometra........vsS-casees eee 39
junceus, Hudiocrinus:4ns2so8s2-2- seeeeeee 136
jungerseni, Thaumatocrinus............... 181
Kallispongia‘archeri_......-.2eseecmee eis 35
kerguelensis, Promachocrinus..........-... 47,
54, 315, 316, 331, 332, 337, 338, 371
Klunzingerl, Antedon--......-.-..--/2e omen 48
kraepelini, Antedon...............---.--- 48
Tsevacirra; Antedon....-< .-eee eae ee 37, 45
Ievipinna, Antedon...........-----------< 38, 44
levis: Antedon=...«...-=-..eeepoaeess-see 43
levissima, Amphimetra.............------- 35, 44
IAmtedOnscicccs scene as re OO eee 44, 53
Comatils <. o.4<.2-s' 25-200 ceueeeee 35
Pag Pana s soos ces io =. ee ee 178
Wuamprometta:... 2. 2-- +6 -0nn-nse-e= ---- 23, 51
PY LOS oon os «ame n'a ieee 39, 45, 49
palmata..........-- 22, 23, 29, 31, 45, 48, 49, 54
protectus........-----s22sss0--.-=-5 22, 23,
29, 31, 37, 38, 45, 48, 49, 50, 52, 54, 255, 363
SimILIBS ...6,A<0<3sesseeceGe-e eee tees 45
RUD HLISSS: 224+ «a<cigs0esesee eee 51
lateralis, Glyptometra..........-.--------- 299
latipinna, Antedon....-....-.---------+--- 42
Thalassometra..-=.=--.. = sessneseaeees 2
lepida, Antedon...........-------++++++--+ 49
Leptometra.... 236, 304, 306, 324, 325, 329, 372, 374
Celtichsesese===1 43, 55, 177, 243, 303, 305, 369
phalangium..-... 29,31, 32, 43, 55, 125, 273, 301
Leptonemaster.....-.------+------++-+++-- 240, 296
WEDUIBESs<cigts = as = i 83, 247, 279, 353
leucomelas, Comatula.......----.--------- 28
liliiformis, Encrinus. .........------------ 352
lineata, Actinometra......------..--++---- 46
iAntedon =~ == <.-02 sens -paeeee Seer 43
Nemaster.....--.-------= 36, 46, 220, 247, 374
Liparometra articulata....----.----- 31, 33, 39, 45
regalis......-.---------+-22-22-2--+--- 45
littoralis, Actinometra....--...-.---------- 47
lofotensis, Rhizocrinus. - - - -- 56, 120, 205, 208, 211
longicirra, Antedon.....------------------- 42
Asterometra...<---0-20--.ce= = =nenisidne 42
400 INDEX.
Page. Page.
longipinna, Antedon..............2....-2- 43 | maxima, Heliometra.............-c-scn--- 307
Thaumatometra sc, < 2/22 2c. Sees 43 | mediterranea, Antedon........... a= 21522128525;
outsells. : 5 sco ss Seigs se oe eee See 178 30, 31, 32, 43, 55, 56, 119, 120, 121, 122,
lovéniwAntedons2..c2ceses asst coS eee 39, 44 123, 125, 132, 169, 271, 300, 306, 315, 316
Compsometraccs saa. 2c Sassen eee 35, Comatularsceet sss beet pace eee 25, 27, 30
39, 44, 174, 299, 300, 315, 317, 329, 369 (Bllecto) 2 ,s\.cenciacoe oe ce Se 31
ludovici, Antedon. (<2. 32 tcs5-4eee 38, 48, 52 | meridionalis, Actinometra.................. 46, 53
Tuna ‘marina fo /ss05 3). sano s oe lo eee 23 Comatula Me .cccc.225 25 .eeo eee 33
Alterayeee note oss ere. ae eee 23: || mertensi, Comatula:...-:.2...4.ccseeomeee. 35
lusitanicaAntedon...22.- 25-02 288 42, 44,55 | Metacrinus ..............--. 78, 102, 214, 358, 380
Mhalassometra sc: cto see esa 42, 44, 55 TOUUMGUB!. << /-/-/-ses arcsec eae 89
Lytechinus variegatus............2..------ 127) | meyeri, Actinometra:+*>-2.22-ee-neesoaee 38
macrobrachius, Actinometra...........--.-. 49 | micraster, Comatula.:................ 75, 234, 298
Capillasters:...--- S848 2ee/49 1234) 2388940) | Macrocomatula:: . seu. 550 see eee 240, 296
macrodiscus, Antedon............---.- 51, 54, 91 MOFlenseNl-s <2 secce sc ees ee 288
‘Tropiometra...-- ies eee teins 51, 275 | microdiscus, Antedon.................. 39, 42, 52
macronema, Antedon..............-..----- 44, 49 AY SOMCTA: ./--'255ic0e2 eee eee 39, 52, 283
Comatulas 62-22. se adeeeee eee SOFaL 33) || Malbertiiproup-——-- ener ance eee 41, 43, 52
Ptilometra...... 31, 33, 44, 47, 81, 151, 153, 295 | milberti, Amphimetra.. 31, 32, 35, 39, 44, 48, 49, 53
macropoda, Asterometra..........-------- 155, AMF Ed ON k)raaces cosets 39, 44, 48, 49, 51, 53
235, 267, 268, 295, 363 Comatulaus ac26539n ocean ee 32
maculata, Actinometra........-...- 46, 49, 51, 53 (Allecto) {28 ..25..46,3. cA ee 31
Comatellac. 2 s:3.2ac ote 46, 49, 51, 52, 220, 353 var. dibrachiata, Antedon............. 29
magellanica; Antedons-.acscc-<.5-s-/eeeeemoos 45) | prndl ler seers seca ease eee eee itp 26
IL ORO UO CUES eterna ciate a seontsee oa 38, 43, 51, 294 AleCto.calaeest nudes ove ae eee 29
magnicirra, Antedon=.- 2-2 <= cence RE 54 Anited on a2. cs ac:d-2 ole ou cS 33
Crotalometras. 25. =. sees oe oe 54 Comatulla.c.s.ssancestieat J Cee 31
magnifica, Actinometra.........-.-------- 47. |; Millerierinus.-/.---.scecse hee nee 212, 222
@omanthenias.ossascce ccc eons ee 47 | minutissima, Bathymetra..................- 311
magnipeda, Asterometra...............-.-.. 268 | mirifica, Asterometra...............-..---- wae
major, Peathyrometra...:/....-.5...-...--- 159) | molleri, Amphimetra...........2s220. 44, 49, 53
manca, -Antedonics-ssenccrseasccee nee 45° || mollis; *Decamoettas 2-26-22. aoe eee 291
Cyllomettai soos: « Jsss2ce os sacle 5472895374" |) Molpadiidees mee: «22: oan. DEE ee 133
marpinata;-Antedon)=.s 27 cee ee eee 45, 54 | monacantha, Antedon.....................- 49
Stephanometra.<..- 5... sct-eiseise- ciel 45, 54 Stephanometra.s....- coca sees 49, 50, 63
tetephanometra,...2 .~ ioc se ceeeeetsee 54 | Monachocrinus.........--... 212, 213, 214, 318, 345
Thalassomettar. .:<)<.=<)si<sr.no tae ¢ 159 Carib bese. ::.03.5). «see ee 203, 205
marie, (Capillasterss: (225205 .980. 5. 2 eee 46, 277 Paradoxs=- 2\255,.- uesteeee seek eee 203
Blérometrac.s- os ees cece ss were eeee 269\\|i;moorel;, Antedons...-2---4ee ee ee ee arneu0)
Mariametra delicatissima.................. 67 |, nioroceama, Antedon.-=.-2.-sseeesee eee ee 43,
subcarinata........----- 255, 287, 328, 329, 361 90, 120, 122, 123, 300, 315, 316, 339
VACA aaios Scjcts saree: ws cin bee ce IE 50 | mortenseni, Microcomatula............-... 288
Mariametride........... 116, 234, 242, 248, 285, 290, | miilleri. Pentacrinus..................-.-- 120
292, 296, 300, 312, 325, 326, 328, 329 Ptilometra. 35, 44, 49, 65, 149, 235, 295, 315, 365
THBIINA, UUM occ oss < vic cine a's oe Se 2 23 | multibrachiata, Actinometra............... 46
alterna; Tunas 22 tec sich cS eo on See 23 Comasten: sos. s aaa eceer bese 46, 51, 85, 266
marinis polyactis, Stella...................- 23 | multicolor, Neometra...........-..... 67, 329, 363
Maraiiprceaetcs.ce ence 28 westerns 74, 180, 182, 202, | multifida, Actinometra................. 39, 47, 51
204, 215, 242, 314, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346 Alecia ae lonecbee: ian eee 29, 30
MIALCENSIN ANTOOON: 6. < . os eee eee eles oe 48 @omaster-socew esse 25, 29, 31, 33, 39, 47, 52, 339
Hnmeremettass. <=. ..-:-eee ee eee ae 48, Comatula 2... S-ecncnnescnctcenueeees 31, 33
65, 253, 285, 328, 329, 359, 375 | multiradiata............--..-eeeeeeeeee 25, 29, 30
Mastipomotraccs 225.20 J255 scan eee 268, 284, 286 Actinometra........ - 33, 38, 46, 49, 51, 53, 54, 55
INDEX.
Page.
multiradiata, Antedon, .......c2052i.4.8282 42
PAUSHOTIAN Nera oe wei fae wie boc aisclcioe 23, 24, 25, 29, 30
(Gapillaster) 2-222 28. oh Bese 23
@apillasteres cases. ses oe 14, 22, 28, 25, 31, 33,
35, 38, 39, 46, 49, 50, 51, 53, 54, 81, 266, 277
Comatula ......... 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 50, 119
(GAlecto) eases scenes cuatetie 31
multiradiatus, Comaster.................--- 33
multispina, Antedon..............-
MI AIRBHOM CLEA seis oe aint Eni Se
Miy-ZOSLOMas eames amen anlage sainisioe seeeiseeee
MANA WAM LET ON ic csisin canine ae eee een 49
HAI OMIGHTAee =o senses coe ReeeR eRe 49, 266
Namrometrateeiie = e122 ere /eiseye mele 250, 304, 306, 308
HO WCISLer ere leachate iste Saeco 269, 307
naresi, Promachocrinus........-..-----...-- 47
Whanmatocrinus 2 tars. sca eee 47,181
N@umachocrinuss..---=----=-—--—- eee 210, 345
DR WAUIERAIS Sac ooo 5 22 ce nnt ~ ase e 20208
WWenasteriecceoos cesses ees 80, 102, 112, 240, 296
PIBOMIUUSe sere ros aces eRe nsec 247, 279, 353
TOW EWEN es soo cus saoseaseeae Jocoul[aaS 53
inreatae ee. sooo eee ee 36, 46, 220, 247, 374
nematodon, Amphimetra......--.---.--.--- 48
AI LECODERE bee chin eir sas sn een sccice 48
Weocomatella........------.2i 22s. 77,240; 296
Pula beta see eta15 = eile i= 36, 46, 125, 247, 321, 326, 353
pula Case ta oS ehn eich a1 et ot -tesaeteet 46
europza.--.-.------------------------ 46
Mea mie ike | ecieee eels ete este iat 230
Base AS CCM See am ans <foieie le eee ea 147
TOMBE OOS see oe cele sean se 67, 329, 363
MiprayeA ChinOMet A=. -2-------~-2-\- == =I 46
Gomatella--: 22 2-0-2 == 46, 247, 277, 325, 353
nigrolineata, Coccometra.....-.---------- 53, 299
nobilis, Actinometra.......---.------------ 47,51
notata, Actinometra.......-.-------------- 48, 54
novee-guinex, Actinometra..---------------- 37, 46
PGC LOnee eee se nee a eee eee =i 29
Womastersen n-ne eee 29, 31, 38, 37, 46, 325
Riots sree ee eS oe «ets SL oS.
nudus, Phrynocrinus....-.---------------- 61, 210
nutrix, Eurocidaris........---------------- 127
obscura, Trichometra...-------------------- 243
occulta, Antedon...-.--------------------- 45
okelli, Antedon......---------------------- o4
Oligometra...-------------- 118, 268, 284, 300, 302
carpenteri .......--------------+---- a
japonica. .......----------------++++---
serripinna...-.------ 37, 43, 49, 50, 53, 291, 292
401
. Page.
Oligémotrides!s 33) 2-.-=.5. ee 116, 302
adeone............... 25,31, 32, 39, 44, 52, 293
thetidisec 55.5 pene eee 273, 293
omissa JAintedon: 2025-5 See 55
‘Thalsssometra-<c05 352i tone <a 55
Ony chocrintis 252 ee ae. eee ee 123
Ophiocrinisy--f-4:5. 5. ce 25-4 eee 37
ING igWa AH eines. as 37
34
7
230
orion, Parametra........-.......-.- 63, 67, 239, 365
ornatissima, Strotometra..............-.--- 163
ornatus, Hudiocrinus................ 253, 331, 359
OwstontPrometra..ce---- ee seo aee eee 291
oxyacantha, Antedon............... 49
Stephanometra. -.)-- .c!wieest Be atest 49
Oxymetras 2 .seet eee e ce. oes 306
erinaceatescscc 2: 5c aeSeaeeeeeee ae 49
fiNnsChil. . -osscasnh so hee eRe eee aa 49, 266
Pachylometral.<..-c2s.50.22.2scceces seater 248, 378
anpusticaly xt sfc. tesa eee oe 45, 367
borealis: swssestes eee «23h ates discerns 299
distinctaticecs.nc0 os oedece see eee 45
flexiliss22 6 23 (2355) ccce nee eo eeeeee 43, 44
insequallis: 5 <oo-icsi<'s cj See 45, 367
Pail ese eee eee 44
TODUSlAeee- os cchas awe ee eee eee 44
AGlatert: .. se scien ane occ ee eee 54
selenert2 cb 56 te) as slowc ee seeteeeeeers 81
pacificus, Bathycrinus......--......----.-- 63
PgS TO bese ween aan ee ee ee
Palseocomatella.--. 25-2 n= eel 240, 296, 308
difficilisses2eS ss a2 twice o)- eee ae 46
Palmata proulpes---6---=----— ~~ =e 41, 45, 52
palmata, Alecto...........-------------- 28, 29, 34
Antedoukcesqissce==as ee eer 45, 49, 53, 54, 55
Gomatula)/(Alecto)e- <2. -e-eeeeeee me 31
Lamprometra -..--. 22, 23, 29, 31, 45, 48, 49, 54
paradoxus, Monachocrinus..........------- 203
Param trat:. cso -20-'=-1ss see eee ee ee ee
alboflavas:ccktencecce see we ee ee eee eee
COMpressa....-.----------++--++---+--- 44
fisheri....- So veied ements eee ae 297
granulifera.......----------------2--- 44
OUION eeeeee ete Eee 63, 67, 239, 365
parkinsoni, Apiocrinus...-..-------------- 352
parre, Endoxocrimusssos. <2 soos eee 120
parvicirra, Actinometra...-....----------- 37,
38, 39, 46, 49, 50, 51, 52, 54
402 INDEX.
Page. Page.
panvicitra:/Alecto sos. oes ee ee cian teee 29, 30,36 | perspinosa, Antedon.............---.- 37, 44, 49
Amtodon 2253 23882 sc.oe 2cce cece 44 Colobometras4o2¢5-5-- soeenesee 37, 39, 44, 49
Goman thus! < sc s Se ceuise a cemieweeiecee 29, | Betasometra::22.5% .62256 ae ee 302
31, 33, 35, 37, 38, 39, 46, 49, 50, 51, 52, Laie POLS AN sia doch ceca 48
54, 118, 120, 125, 228, 281, 288, 286, | petasus, Alecto..2.....c2.-0s-ceecs-eree0e- 30
238, 251, 281, 286, 292, 321, 351, 357 Antedon.... 21,31, 32, 43, 56, 165, 300, 315, 316
Comatulan cc: sc -scese cence <Oaeeeeeee 33 Comatula.atjsseeetigs ccc tea eee 32
(Ble@cto) << Jan 5 0.te neocon eae 31 (Alecto) . stc2-3.. eee ae 31
Tridomotrac%:.«./..6oe eRe es 44°) phalancium, sAlecto.....-..-eeneseee ane 29
Parviclrra PTOUP. =<. <= «<0 cise aimee oeemoe 42, 46 Antedon.)..5-0255- 5-6. eee 43, 55, 324
parvipinna, Antedon...2-sscc0---s-ceeeeeee 43, 54 Comat... 2. cchase so eeteneaee eee 32
Strotometr aes. cob sss eccteoae cease 43 (Alle@Ct0) 2i:sa 5) nicnici-e sinc tee 31
parvula, Antedon. <2... 20) ee aS 51 Leptometra..... 29,31, 32, 43, 55, 125, 273, 301
Thavmatometrass..<¢-s: sesso eee ee bi! || PhanGeenig-Ge-.. -<2- oscsceon sce on eee 34
patulay Antedonvscese so. a. VERE 44 bY PLCS ates c cee cies ceeeesocee Re 34, 120
Pachylometra:-6..<.<c.)te See cae 44 | philiberti, Amphimetra...............-.-- 31,
paucicirra, Actinometra......... - 39, 46, 48, 51, 52 32, 45, 255, 283, 328, 329, 361
Paucicirra group: . =. -ecaseackereeaeces 41, 46, 48 Comatilas'..<65 sneecceaetse eee 31, 32
pectinata, Actinometra............ 33; 40749501552 || MPhYynecrinusy .2c/e2s ese em eee emcee 208, 212, 222
Asteriag: =< i focdsts2ssccurseds ceases 23, 24, 30 MUA TIS ot HAs caw See se eee ee 61, 210
Comatulas.222=- 222.2255 235-)| (PAV TOCTINUS S. wis 012 ats cigchon seem sini eee 27
31, 33, 39, 45, 49, 51, 52, 75, 79,81, 83, | picta, Tropiometra........-..-------2--2- 34,
220, 249, 281, 298, 321, 325, 351, 355 37, 38, 43, 44, 67, 125, 293, 321, 363, 374
Polagothuria..(0o: 22s. /s-<2222 260s 138)}pineiis, Comanthus:. -o- sees eee eae eee 93,
Penitacrintites. ss 2s. j.ste2c0se5 52220 se eee 86 118, 229, 231, 234, 238, 281, 292
Pontacrinitidees a5. ce ciice Setar 377 | pinnatus, Eudiocrinus.................-.- 137
Pentacrinus caput-meduse...........-.----- 33 Ptiloeninws. 205 Bb Peace cc secc ser 207
CULO PUBS. <2 ese socsse's feth ee 27,28 | pinniformis, Amphimetra.........-.-....- 37,43
millers Js scsencce 2255 48n 6 20 Antedonic.trecsemcwseeeeceso see 37, 39, 43
Pentametrocrinidee-........22...-:::-+-++-- 64, | planapetura, Caudina..---.-..-.---..---e=6 127
110, 114, 115, 117, 234, 248, 254, | Platycrinus...............2-.2----- 184, 208, 210
289, 302, 304, 312, 326, 330, 331, 358 | Plicatocrinide................-- 98, 202, 314, 315
Pentametrocrinus................ 53,310) 3584379) | Porcilometra....< <= <-kicjonss so ee eee ee 84, 248
atlanticuas:=25-5.se2 isconc2 es Seeeeee 38, 42, 55 CORA: A ASa eee cc oes we tems eee 43, 63, 367
CiGmMed CW e; J sacs-f see see eee 187, 302 | polyactis, Stella marinis.............-.... 23
jJaponicus:.......... 37,42, 93,302, 311,329,373 | polyarthra, Alecto. .......---2cseee=-s-se0 29
BOMPOLle 3-2 osaacs ssh aeeecnseeeeee 37, 42,373 | polycnemis, Comantheria...........- 234, 238, 266
BPocksetacsecocss soscsh eee ee ee 191 | polymorpha, Actinometra...........-.---- 36
tuberculatusses-ests. coxte ccs 42, 189, 302 | pontifer, Thalassocrinus.........-.......-- 209
VaTIANG 3022 Se anise cee 37, 42, 185, 267, 302, 329 | Pontiometra...............--..- 296, 306, 370, 376
peregrina, Actinometra..................... 51 andersoni. . - . - 40, 48, 49, 255, 287, 329, 349, 361
Comisslas 2% sis2.5 os eee Sones esee eee 51 ENIEP GTA TUS! secs ee eee eee a eee 77
pergracilis, Thalassometra.................. 42) porrecta, Antedons <2. weer aoe eteeeee 45
perlegens, Stella chinensis.................. 22 @rotalometra:33-d25asa-e haere eae ae 45
Perometras 22. ssecse es ss eonnet ee 804, 308 | pourtalesi, Antedon..............-.-.+---. 44
diomedew............ 65, 179, 307, 329, 349, 371 | pourtalesii, Antedon...................-.-- 36
DUS A. «ose eRe eee tee ese eee 43 | producta, Amphimetra..............-..--- 53, 266
Perometring: 2-2-2 =.= s/o 254, 286 | profundorum, Psathyrometra........-...-- 241
peroni, Actinometra..... 0/0: 2 eee 47 | Proisocrinus........ 208, 210, 212, 214, 270, 344, 378
peronn, Actinomotra.<)... 2. 0.cses0e ee eee 37 TUDSLTIMUSA Es cn oe ee 199
persica, Himerometra.................... 273; 285 || prolixa, Amtedon 22. .<< se mcaeee seers 43, 55
persis, Lrichometraces. ce -ecome sees oeeee 43 Hathrometra.......... 43, 55, 300, 315, 317, 329
INDEX.
Page.
Promachocrinus. ......... 36, 39, 40, 54, 62, 90, 94,
100, 109, 116, 191, 192, 193, 211, 250, 254,
266, 271, 284, 292, 304, 308, 313, 329, 330,
332, 335, 336, 337, 339, 354, 358, 380, 381
ADYRSORUM Ese nic ceecae cece cc eee 47, 59, 338
FOUDIIMNAEEE -eheiisse2 os cas cts See 55
ereielensis ese. dt ote ck nS 47,
54, 315, 316, 331, 332, 337, 338, 371
AKCA Meese ae ne Se cet ace cccketesees 47
vanhomenianus.< << --2c0ccccobeeede 54
Prometrachadwicki. ...=--.<..scssssee ces 54
OWALOR IAMS Ss 3f) atest oc) s SI 291
protectayAMted Onn =. Seo. Joeloc ese ess ~ <= 45, 49
protectus, Lamprometra................ 22, 23,29,
31, 37, 38, 45, 48, 49, 50, 52, 54, 255, 363
Mea VTOMOU As =.-=,<2 2c a sctieraciseeeee eee 242,
250, 254, 289, 302, 304, 326, 329, 330
Iptorad alan ce nek se an eet 51
Iborealigte: 250-1 en es ek cae Sees 176, 241
Conceriaeeeea eee raaee se enoosee ces oer 241
enybhrizoneetee. cree ceeeeieses eee 241
Frege tine oie ER eee ees 241, 301, 369, 375
ANUSLtata = <2 2sse0-csbee ese se Sees 242, 245
MONO sco ooadeasseaqdadpadSacdacSscss 159
PPLOLNMGOTUM wer seer cee er elaine alate 241
SE eeeteteie eatetatele (aire l= aint tereyatte ine ate bl
IROL seer eyeee cleo = s)stal=/c) serene es 138, 140
Pterometra.........- 106, 244, 268, 277, 292, 305, 308
BRIG HO POGAe ene ne eer elise sel iae 81
IP irlocnimus eee. ss csicee= 208, 210, 318, 344, 345
para get eeee ere eer aleetatate estat stoner nie retatate 207
Ptilometra.. 35, 118, 244, 268, 277, 292, 305, 308, 328
macronema......- 31, 33, 44, 47, 81, 151, 153, 295
miilleri..... 35, 44, 49, 65, 149, 235, 295, 315, 365
featilomie tinyni se ental atria ieletarmteiais ele ies 292
pubescens, Thalassometra..-..-.-.--------- 297
pulchella, Actinometra....---...----------- 46
PATIfedO Weare eer aaa eaeeiae eens 36
Ganymeda.......-------++------------ 24, 28
pumila, Antedon......-.-.--.---------- 39, 44, 47
182
punctatum, ees. oeanadd
purpurea, Alecto.......-------------------- 30
Comatula. . ook # . 32, 45,
51, 75, 132, 221, 995, 228, 236, 238, 266, 298
pusilla, Antedon.. ee yaeeee 43
Perometra. . pes 5 oy eC OO Racine 43
quadrata, eet onomean. Lea E se 46
Jingle ce penosecconeeoopebuebeoUscs 43
quinduplicava, Antedon....-.--.---------- 45
Heterometra ..-.---- 45, 235, 253, 292, 359, 375
quinquecostata, Antedon.....------------- 44
ROM OMe LEAR aaa ees ane einctose ames) 44,100
403
Page.
rawsonii, Democrinus...........-.--.----- 203, 205
regalis, Actinometra................-- 47, 49, 51, 52
fAnitedon ch Beat}. 2-2 oe 45
Taparometra 222.2 55,- b= gacaees occcae 45
regins:, ‘Antedon-<=.: .22cs-s<~o ene 39, 45
remota, ‘Antedon 22-208 = 252-2 seen 43
Thanmatometrac.c.ss-- see eee 43
renovatus, Thaumatocrinus............... 42, 47,
59, 183, 332, 338, 339
reynaudi; Antedon:........sasaceeeeeees 45, 54
Comatilaes £8 30-2233. eee ee 32
reynaudil, Comatila.......--.--tanentecens 30
Comatula (Alecto)...-<. 22. .sanecessee 31
Heterometra.......- 31, 32, 45, 54, 255, 361, 375
Rhizocrinus.... 121, 202, 210, 212, 213, 318, 344, 345
lofotensis! 325-222-20--5-< < 56, 120, 205, 208, 211
Vemilliz..scic.5.5ss2-saneeeeeeienees 205
rhomboidea, Antedon..... .-.-.---scsbeasde< 43, 51
robusta, Actinometra..2..5---cnsaeseeeees 38, 39
Antedon. 22.2 .2.-2 .2- 2 -Reeeeodeeebe oe 44
Chlorometraz se. seso52 enna cee 239
Pachylometrasi<.<<.cc0-- 5 oesewetee == 44
robustipinna, Actinometra......-.---.-- 37, 47, 52
Himerometragze . i255 2222 canes 37; 47248550
rosacea, Antedon........-.-.-------- 33, 38, 43, 55
Comatilaics22-2-------22c5n-2- eee 27
AEKEIDELLOG a a5 wie laa mo n\ = =~ = <iielseiai= B= = 22
rosea Alectosse-Sac ee ooh wine eee eeeee 29, 130
Comatalae: Ack .66s Be ee he eae
rotalaria, Actinometra.........--..--------- 46, 51
@omatulass sesce essen . 25,31,
33, 39, “46, ‘51, 52, 221, 223,
233, 238, 249, 298, 321, 326
(Actinometra)=--------s- ssa 31
rotundus, Metacrinus........---.----------- 89
ruber, Erythrometra........------------ 329, 371
ruberrimus, Proisocrinus.....-------------- 199
rubiginosa, Actinometra.....-------------- 53
At ed One Jace ae ee ose eee 34
rugosa, Chlorometra..--..--------+-++++++- 160
Sagenocrinus......-------------+-+-++++++- 174
samoana, Comanthus.......--------------- 46, 49
Baral: Alectos lcci ae See eee eee eee ee 27, 30
Gomatulac dco. s<soccem eee eee 32
(Alecto)......-------++-+-+++-++2+- 31
Hathrometra. 31, 32, 120, 273, 288, 309, 315, 317
Hyponome bc oaeiccie eee a cemaee mises 34
savignii, Comatula (Alecto).- WN ae 31
Heterometra......-------- 28, 29, 31, 33, 45, 54
savignyi, Antedon......-------+++-++----- 45, 54
Comatula..c...cn<<--snnes--ene neve 33
Savignyi group..-...-.-------+++-+++-->> 41, 45, 52
404 INDEX.
é Page. Page.
schlegeli, Actinometra.......---..-------- AT | Stephanometta.2.2-.-.--.-2~--seeseee 106, 118
schlegelii, Actinometra.......-..-.--------- 37 echiniis! 262.9206 ie eG Su ee ee 00
Gomanthinas.co. << ---sh- 14, 37, 39, 47, 49, 51, inGica? 2S: e: es ee Pe 36, 45, 53, 54
52, 53, 225, 227, 229, 236, 238, 266, 339 qnarpinatas. 62. \sd..8R Hee Qe one 45, 54
sclateri, Antedon.~J22.2--=---2--seeseaee 54 Pmarginata: «<<. siscmecceie sds eeeeee 54
Pachylometras secs. eee ee eee ee 54 mongcantha: Jon .osscenee 49, 50, 63, 273, 287
selene, Pachylometra.........-.---------- 81 OXVACANUNA ooo oe op cineca 49
semperi, Eudiocrinus.........-.---------- 37, 42 Bpicatascse bes hie athe -bie-se seer 37, 45, 48
Pentametrocrinus.....-..--------- 37, 42, 373 spinipinnass.<sis-22522-55255 eee nee 49
sentosa, Actinometra......-....----------- 46, 53 tenUvIpPINNS . - 2205-56 - s eee eee 49, 300
Capillaster.........-- 25, 31, 33, 38, 46, 53, 266 tuberculate. ... 52-22-22 sss eee 45, 50, 52
separata, Calometra........-..----+--:-+ 293, 329 | Stephanometride...........-..---------- 116,
Serrasal mos sasc205)2% = 222.7 ote ee eee 286 234, 242, 243, 285, 292, 300, 312, 325
serrata, Compsometra.........-.-.-------- 999: | (Stiremetra...:------2---5- sssaneckeawe tos 246, 308
serripinna, Antedon........... 37, 43, 49, 51, 53, 54 acutiradia.:$.o2<2--25-6-s=pe===— = 42
Oligometra........-- 37, 43, 49, 50, 53, 291, 292 AEACHNOI OSes ee ee eee = = eee 239
sibogee, Atopocrinus..........-.-----+--+-- 245 Ibvevatad ae eeeneeeee eee eee 42, 365
gimiliss Antedon. 2oo-.-+- 4. setae ae ee 45 carinifera 2.2. 422o2¢e5-.-<se ano 159
Tamprometras...+--..2 50 Sees 45 spinicinra: ./s255 225 sc526'ecn.-512 See 42
simplex, Actinometra...............-:...- 46, 51 | strota, Actinometra...........-.---------- 39
Comatulac Cece caccw cere See O77 \\KSROLOMOLTA =... 53. <a0 sn alsin en eee 248
sol, Himerometra..<c<.. 5. -4-ee eee eee 53 OFM AAS Ge do saee.5- exe peewee sees 163
Sdlanometra-.<.c-sa- . SO eee 76, parvipinnass = 32. sey: oe - eaeeeee 43
250, 254, 266, 271, 308, 329, 330, 378, 380 | Stylometra.................------------ 246, 308
antarcticarics Socket ee 48, 321, 371 spinifera...... 37, 44, 73, 237, 292, 297, 328, 365
Solaris(eroups «<< sick — Lee cer den sees 41, 45 subcarinata, Mariametra. ... 255, 287, 328, 329, 361
solaris, Actinometra.............- 38, 39, 45, 49, 52 | Subtilis, Antedon................-..------- 51
Comatula.....-.... 25, 31, 32, 33, 34, 38, 39, 45, Lamprometra.....-....---------------- ol
49, 52, 118, 220, 249, 298, 326, 351, 355 | Sulcatus, Atelecrinus..............-------- 192
(Actinometra):.----se9e see 31 | tanneri, Florometra..........--.---.-..-.: 51
solaster, Comanthus.......:....-..-2.222 118, 134 | taprobanes, Decametra.------- =.= eee 53
spicata; Antedont..o- oes s=2-<--- 68 37, 45, 48, 55 | Taxocrinide.........-..-.----------+-++-- 332
PAT telonP ste Ae Soc eee Fee EXOCKENUS = we entail eae 122
Stephanometra...............-.--. 37, 45, 48 | Teliocrinus......-....--------++--+++--+++ 286
spinicirra, Antedon...----.-.eussese=en- ae 42 BDU Penne see eee eee eee 195, 197
Stiremetra; <.« <.<c@t ccc ct eee. 49) Wenellaieroup--.-— eee ee 41, 43, 52
Spinifera proup-..-<---.- tesa seeeee 41, 44, 51, 54 enella; “Anted on). <n = eee rea es 43, 55
Bpinifera, Antedon---: ..-sseesuseee. eee 37, 44 AST OTISS 2 sane aera em emer eee 24, 27, 30, 32
Stylometra.... 37, 44, 73, 237, 292, 297, 328, 365 Hathrometra..........--.--------- 24, 56, 329
spinipinna, Antedon.....................- 4g | tenelloides, Thysanometra........-....--- 299, 369
Stephanometra. .:<-< -<.ctcseae coe 4g | tenera, Antedon.........--..------------- 49
springert, ‘Teliocrinus. - .. ..-.-.«2-l2s=-i=4 195, 197 Dichromoetta. «5. c2<55----ee soe aes 287
Stella chinensis perlegens........-........ 22) tenuwicirra, Antedon-.---.---+---2---eseeee 43
fin DYIa bee weenie asa oe eo eee 22 Dichromoetracs2< 23-2 4: Gee he ee se 287
marinis polyactis.......-...--..-.:-- 23 Thygsanometra...222eese cess 43
Sialles) Crunt tea 2 eo ce ine tesa 22 | tenuipes, Adelometra............--------- 301
stellata, Arbacia......-.-....--.--..--:- 1275 tenuipinna, Amtedon-—- ----ee-eeee eee 49
stelligera, Actinometra.........-....... 46, 48, 49 Stephanometra..---<-2sc.25--aeeeer 49, 300
Comatella. . ... 46, 48, 49, 50, 51, 54, 81, 247, 353 | tenuis, Thaumatometra..............------ 71, 373
SLEMIP CTA PROUD S a5 «a0, 2-3 oe eee 41,4648 | tessellata;Alectot jac --j-- 2 << seieeescsse 29
Stenometra.—-..-- ses woe sb) S08, 374 246 AMUN We ssa seen eee = tees 29, 31
PLOTRRED rice oe oh Seo peer eee 237 Antedonin.<5csc(-s/<asecs5 ese eee Se ee 44
quinquecostata.. <<< .cc.< sec cccmes 44, 65, 365 Comatula. cc aissecnceec'sesoeemeeeemer 31, 32
INDEX. 405
Page.
Thalassocrinus.....---------- 208, 210, 316, 344, 345
pontifer......-.-.-------+++-++-+22e-2- 209
TThalassometra....-------------- 246, 277, 305, 308
agassizil........-------------+-+-++++-+- 51
bispinosa.......-----------+-----+7---- 42
EGhinalameeeeeeeneranmee cee -ci= =e 42
gigantea.....------------------- 239, 246, 297
RAWAM NSIS La aapcosaaeneas ate oORoE Sorc 237
latipinna......-.-.--+-2--2+--2-0522: 42
Misitanicaeacecssccies == se one es 42, 44, 55
marginata.....--.---------2--70222- = 159
multispina.....-.-----------+-+++°+-- 42, 45
TELL RSs nee a eae otiaia orm iat (crane falsi=ize 55
pereracilis.......-------------222202-7- 42
pubescens.....---------++-++-+++27777 297
ITN ORae eee eles eee isietara= 157, 237, 292, 365
Thalassometride...-..---- 78, 98, 115, 117, 232, 234,
236, 242, 244, 246, 248, 254, 276,
286, 290, 292, 294, 296, 298, 304,
306, 312, 325, 328, 329, 330, 377
Thaumatocrinus. ...------------ 11, 39, 40, 42, 59,
62, 90, 100, 109, 121, 191, 192,
193, 194, 195, 313, 330, 332, 335,
336, 337, 338, 339, 354, 358, 380
jungerseni.....-.----------------+-7--- 181
RC eee ates eeicn san 47,181
renovatus...-.---- 42, 47, 59, 183, 332, 338, 339
Thaumatometra...---------------+---707 7-77 304
43
43
J 43
Nppnig meee a eee ne = mee eles 43
longipinna...-..-------------------7"- 43
pal yall alesse eee eo ease 51
momiOtheeeeteeccmece cease ee aie a 43
Pertti geese ena eee aie = c= 71, 373
Thenarocrinus...--------------777770 7707 174
thetidis, Oligometrides....--------------- 273, 293
Thiolliericrinus.-.------------ 17, 40, 212, 215, 222
Thysanometra...----------- 289, 302, 304, 306, 329
tenelloides..---------------2°-"77>" 299, 369
Penllicinras.oeos- 2222 2s ==" ae a
GInctrinseee eee ee sec ea
eae eon oc eeaen sees 29,37
Gomatulaseece see. 2 22> sa ae as 31, 33
Gly piomentale fee aca saotoea sone 162 |
Trichometra..--------------777" 242, 254, 304, 308
Meri Can Ae eee eas cates ee aa 309
BE pera ee eee ee laa: ale 243, 307, 329 |
explicate seme ae soc orien ea 243
GhSCUrate cer aeaccea=-cs 2s ot tame a 243
ETSI or sencce ses ep 43
79146°—Bull. g2—15——27
Page.
Trichometra sp. vexator.-..-.------- 51, 243, 329
trichopoda, Pterometra........----------- 81
trichoptera, Actinometra.......------------ 47
Comanthus. ...- - 31, 32, 47, 81, 85, 118, 238, 281
Comatula= Ses eke 30, 31, 32
triserialis, Zenometra...---.-------- 175, 241, 301
T ptaxacdekAKue 0g -.-.- +--+ ---2-20eee en en n= 2 2s 22
Tropiometra......--------- 24, 26, 36, 284, 306, 308
ira hed oceans eee eats or laert aa 49, 145
SudOUINi.=-e2 cee assassinate ame 38, 44
carinata.. 25, 30, 31, 32, 34, 37, 38, 44, 50, 54, 125
@NCTINUAses sees see eer = Be ee one
INGICR ose ees e on seen esinamaaa ea 44, 54
macrodiscus....--.---------+---+==:- 51, 275
Pita. cence == =< eee ere S eee cee 34,
37, 38, 43, 44, 67, 125, 293, 321, 363, 374
BD e seca sae ec =e nore a= earner 24
SP: DOV. --22---0ce === eer ooe en 39
Tropiometridw......------+++++++--777- 113, 116,
234, 242, 243, 289, 292, 312, 325, 328, 329
tuberculata, Antedon....-.--------------- 45, 52
Stephanometra. ..----------------- 45, 50, 52
tuberculatus, Pentametrocrinus......- 42,189, 302
tuberosa, Antedon....-----------+-++-+++-7° 42
Glyptometra. ....-------+-----++7+7"- 42
Typica group.------------ 2277770722777" 41, 46
typica, Actinometra. ..---------- 37, 46, 49, 52, 53
Comaster...----------- 34, 37, 39, 46, 49, 51, 52,
120, 234, 238, 240, 266, 339
Phanogenia..--------+++-22222777777" 34, 120
Uintacrinide...-------------+-- 64, 84, 94, 110, 111
Uintacrinus - - ------ 74, 80, 82, 85, 94, 123, 180, 202,
204, 215, 242, 314, 343, 344
unicornis Cenometra.------------++77777> 143, 289
valida, Actinometra...--------++-+---*77** 46
Aplaometra. .---------+2--- 0000070077 42
(Amtedon. 2-20 2ecce~ emer = seo 42
Walida @rOUps: <2 eo< >. += sooe non sees 41, 46
vanhéffenianus, Promachocrinus. - -------- 54
variabilis, Actinometra. .-------------- 39, 47, 51
yarians, Budiocrinus. - ---------+222777*-- 7,42
Pentametrocrinus. --- - 37, 42, 185, 267, 302, 329
variegatus, Lytechinus. . -----------*2-"7: 127
variipinna, Amphimetra. .---------- 38, 45, 48, 54
Amtedonucesss -o-c-"=2 on =a 7s 38, 44, 51, 53
2variispina, Antedon. ...-----------"--7"" 50
venustus, Leptonemaster. ------- 83, 247, 279, 353
vepretum, Colobometra..---------------7** 49
sparrillin Rt biZOGHENUS se <1-'-moo ee aee 205
yexator, Trichometra. .---------=--"7""* 243, 329
vicaria, Antedon..---------+-s-r2s""co"""" 50
406 INDEX.
Page. Page.
Vicaria, Mariametray:. 3-..scese--<e oneness 50: | Zenometras 605.220. =... sb G sen ee 248,
villosa, Thalassometra. .......-- 157, 237, 292, 365 254, 277, 290, 292, 302, 304, 308, 329, 330
wahlbergii, Actinometra................... 33 COlUMMNATIS! see ceeet 37, 44, 220, 241, 243, 301
IAibcto: cee A a Sie 30 Trineiie Heol co aaa me 175, 241, 301
Comanthus.......-...---- 31, 33, 54, 223, 315 | Zenometrine..............--.-- 232, 242, 254, 377
Comatula (Actinometra) ......-...-..- alt |, Zeuglodon:s: 2 soca-eseae oe ee 178
‘weber; (Democrmus)--- 5-4 - se eee eee 210%), Ziywomettae22 8h.) rome tees 296, 300, 306
wilsoni, Antedon...........2..220.-eees0e: 47 comiatasys24cb Weert ee 48, 253, 283, 329, 359
wood-masoni, Antedon........-.-...-.---- 50 ClO PANS Hs JS ees olani tah wieted Se ee 39, 52
woodmasoni, Cosmiometra...........-.-..- 50 TM ChOdIscusys-eseves een e eee eee 39, 52, 283
Wy. villabeAtelecrinusis-+-s-s-se5 esse S7PA251937 | Ziyeomotridseses s. = a-e awe ae eee 113,
RMiphowpracss 2c !scce oe tcc kee ee 126 114, 115, 234, 242, 243, 290, 296, 312, 325, 330
O
.
Li
1 nil
a
mi
ih
.
or
an
————
Tn
|
0
Live Music Archive
Librivox Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland Museum of Art
Internet Arcade
Console Living Room
Books to Borrow
Open Library
TV News
Understanding 9/11