THE LIBRARY
OF
THE UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES
Digitized by the Internet Arciiive
in 2007 with funding from
IVIicrosoft Corporation
http://www.archive.org/details/bygonekentOOsteaiala
BYGONE KENT.
NOTE.
Of this book 750 copies have been printed,
and this is
No..
DOVER CASTLE.
Bygone Kent.
EDITED P.Y
RICHARD STEAD, B.A., F.R.H.S.
CANTERBURY:
H. J. GOULUEN
HULL:
WILLIAM ANDREWS & CO., THE HULL PRESS.
London: Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent, & Co., Limiteu.
1 892,
DA
(olO
preface.
FEW counties are so interesting as Kent from
antiquarian, historical, and architectural
points of view, and probably no county can
surpass the " Garden of England " in these
respects. Its cathedrals, its castles, and its old
mansions are known far and wide, and the county
is connected with some of the most stirring and
remarkable incidents in our national story.
So wide is the field to be covered that the
present little volume cannot pretend to do more
than as it were touch its borders. But an attempt
has been made to give a fairly representative
series of pictures of Kent and Kentish life in
olden times ; and it is hoped that " Bygone
Kent " may do some little towards stirring up a
more general interest in the history of this famous
old county.
It should be explained that some little change
has been made in the original series of papers.
During the progress of the work through the
press some very valuable papers were most kindly
placed at my service, especially by the learned
and respected Canon Jenkins, m.a., and by Mr.
643084
PREFACE.
G. M. Arnold, j.p., d.l., f.s.a., of Milton Hall,
Gravesend ; Mr. S. W. Kershaw, m.a., f.s.a.,
librarian, Lambeth Palace Library ; and Mr.
Wollaston Knocker, Town Clerk of Dover. A
few of the less important papers were consequently
set aside to make room for these more important
ones.
To the gentlemen just named my best thanks
are due, as well as to my old and valued friend,
Mr. F. Ross, f.r.h.s., a most able and zealous
antiquary ; and to the Rev. J. S. Sidebotham,
M.A. ; the Rev. W. J. Foxell, b.a., B.Mus. ; and
others, who have so kindly assisted in the
preparation of the present volume. I have also
to thank Mr. E. Lamplough for his obliging
readiness in undertaking the index.
It is, perhaps, as well to add that though I have
undertaken generally to see the several articles
through the press, I have not the time — nor in
some cases the ability — to verify all the statements
contained in papers other than my own. The
various writers are, therefore, alone responsible
for whatever is contained in their respective
articles.
Richard Stead.
Grammar School,
Folkestone, Oct. 241 h, iSgs.
Contents. .
)'AGE
'^Historic Kunt. By Thomas Frost i
Kkntish Place-names. By R. Stead, b.a., k. u. u.s 21
St. Augustine and his Mission. By the Kcv. Geo. S.
Tyack, K.A 39
The Ruined Chai-els and Chantries ok Kent. By Geo.
M. Arnold, J. r., n.L., K.S.A 51
A Sketch of the History ok the Church or Basilica
OK LYMiNtHi. By the Rev. Canon R. C. Jenkins, m.a. 86"
Canterbury Pilgrims and their Sojourn in the City.
By the Rev. W. J. Foxell, b.a 97
William Lambakde, the Kentish Antiquary. By Frederick
Ross, K. R. U.S. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 115
The Revolt ok the Villeins in- the Days of King
Richard the Second. By Edward Lamplough ... 128
Royal Eltham. By Joseph W. Spurgeon ... - ... ... 144
Greenwich Fair. By Thoni.as Frost 167
The Martyred Cardinal. By Frederick Ross, k.r.h.s. ... 177
The Kentish Dialects, and Pegge and Lewis, the Old
County Glossarists. By R. Stead, b.a., k.r.h.s. ... 190
The King's School, Canterbury. By the Rev. J. S. Side-
botham, .M.A. ... ... .. ... ... ... ... 206
S.muggling in Kent 21S
Huguenot Homes in Kent. By S. W. Kershaw, k.s.a. ... 228
Dover Casile. By E. Wollaston Knocker 250
Index 265
BYGONE KENT
1bi£itoric Ik cut.
By Thomas Frost.
NO portion of England has been the scene of
so many important events in the history
of the nation as the county of Kent. Forming
the south-eastern extremity of the country, and
being nearer than any other to the shores of the
European continent, it has naturally been the
landing-place of successive invading hosts. It was
on its coast that the earliest event in our national
history was enacted, for Britain was an unknown
land to the rest of the world, until Julius Caisar
was prompted by the sight of the white cliffs of
Kent to cross the narrow channel with his
victorious legions.
Passing over the second Roman invasion, which
was prompted by the failure of the chiefs of the
Cantii to send to Gaul the prorhised hostages, it
2 BYGONE KENT.
is enough to observe that the Kentish chiefs
found themselves constrained to follow the
example of their allies, and submit to the Roman
rule.
Kent, at this time, and for more than 800 years
afterwards, occupied a unique position among
the counties, the Cantii inhabiting no other part
of the country, while, during the period of the
Saxon Heptarchy, it formed a kingdom of itself.
Roman writers state that the Cantii were more
civilised than the other British tribes, and under
the Roman rule they made considerable advances
in the same direction. Roman bricks, mingled
with masonry of Saxon origin, may be seen to-day
in the lower part of the tower and portions of the
walls of Swanscomb Church, near Gravesend, in
the foundations of Lyminge Church, and in the
remains of the Pharos on the east cliff at Dover.
Fragments of Roman pottery may be found even
now in the mud of the marshy banks of the
Medway, at Upchurch, and on the ridge behind
the marsh, to the east of the Otterham Creek, is
a cemetery of the same period, while near Lower
Halstow Church, the remains of the houses which
those buried there occupied in life may be traced.
Roman bricks and broken pottery, may be found
HISTORIC KENT. 3
also in the embankment at this place, and many
of the former have been worked into the lower
portion of the walls of the church.
The site of the military station of Regulbium,
from which name Reculver is derived, is now under
water, owing to the constant encroachments of the
sea on the east coast ; but Hasted, the historian
of Kent, says that " from the present shore, as far
as a place called the Black Rock, seen at low water-
mark, there have been found great quantities of
tiles, bricks, fragments of walls, tesselated pave-
ments, and other marks of a ruinated town." The
only existing traces of this place are two or three
ditches through the marshes, but large quantities of
Roman coins, pottery, and utensils have, at
different times, been found there. The Roman
governors established a military station there for
the defence of the channel which then divided
Thanet from the mainland : and they had another
at Rutupia^, now Richborough, to guard the
passage of the Stour, then much more important
than in modern times. Layers of Roman bricks
may be seen between the courses of stones in the
walls of Richborough Castle, and some remains of
a Roman amphitheatre are said to have been
visible sixty years ago, in the fields, about five
4 BYGONE KENT.
hundred yards south-west from the ruins of the
castle.
The Anglo-Saxon kingdom of Kent was
founded by Hengist, in 475, and welded by
Egbert with the United Kingdom of England in
823. Ethelbert I. the first Christian monarch of
this miniature .kins'dom, is said to have built a
palace at Reculver, and this may have been
the castle mentioned by some writers, remains
being traceable southward and eastward from
the roofless church. These fragments show-
that the walls were of flints and septaria. There
are no traces of towers. Of the monastery said to
have been founded by Ethelbert not a stone
remains, but the magnificent gate of the one
founded by Augustine still exists at Canterbury,
where also is the oldest parish church in
England, that of St. Martin.
The unity of England had not long been
achieved when the country began to be harassed
by the incursions of the Danes. The first
descent of these invaders was made on the island
of Sheppey, in the reign of Egbert ; but that was
a mere plundering expedition. They came again
and again, however, and in constantly increasing
numbers ; and in 857 they ventured, for the first
HISTORIC KENT. 5
time, to take up their winter quarters in England.
In the following spring, having received strong
reinforcements, they advanced inland from
Thanet, and plundered and burned Canterbury.
Though they were afterwards defeated and
obliged to retreat, they maintained their
settlement in Thanet, and spent ^the following
winter in Sheppey. In the reign of Edward the
Elder, the men of Kent supported the claim of
that monarch's cousin, Ethelwald, to a portion of
the kingdom, and he also enlisted the Danes
settled in the eastern part of the county in his
cause ; but his death in battle with the Kentish
men put an end to the dispute.
The subsequent struggle with the. Danish
invaders was fought out in the northern and north
midland counties, and ended in the settlement of
Danish colonies along all the eastern half of
England. Kent remained undisturbed until the
Norman invasion. At the battle of Hastings the
Kentish men formed the front line of the English
army, a position which they always claimed as of
right, and after the defeat which gave the crown
to the Duke of Normandy they fell back upon
their native soil. Kent submitted at once to the
conqueror, though, according to tradition, a body
6 BYGONE KENT.
of Kentish men surprised a Norman force on
the march to London by issuing from the woods
around the village of Swanscomb, a few miles
from Gravesend,
During the reigns of the Norman and early
Angevin kings, the chief events in the history of
Kent centred in the city of Canterbury. There,
at the foot of the altar, in the cathedral,
Archbishop Becket was assassinated, and there
also arose the conflict between royal and
ecclesiastical authority, which, in the reign of
John, resulted in the kingdom being placed under
an interdict. The story of the murder of Becket
is so well known that there is no need to tell it
here. John's submission to Pandolfo, the Papal
legate, was made at or near Dover.
The invasion of England by the French, in
order to enforce the Papal decree of deposition
against John, was thus averted ; but in the
following reign a French army, acting in support
of a rebellious movement of the English nobles,
landed on the coast of Kent, and besieged Dover,
which was gallantly defended by Hubert de
Burgh. A French fleet, with reinforcements on
board, was repulsed off the coast of Kent, and
this defeat, combined with their ill-success in
HISTORIC KENT. 7
Lincolnshire, which another PVench army had
invaded, induced the enemy to withdraw.
In the next notable events in the history of
Kent, the actual and the legendary are closely
interwoven, but the facts, so far as they can be
gathered, so well illustrate the age that they
ought not to be passed over without notice. The
corpse of a seaman who had been drowned in the
Medway was washed ashore near the village of
Minster, in the Isle of Sheppey, on the foreshore
of the extensive domain of Sir Robert Shurland,
by whom directions were given for its interment
in the parish churchyard. The priest refused to
comply with the knight's order, upon which the
latter ordered a couple of his serfs to dig a grave
in the churchyard, and again commanded the
presence of the priest, who, knowing that Sir
Robert was not a man to be trifled with, was
speedily in attendance. He refused, however, to
offer a single prayer, which so exasperated the
knight that he kicked him into the grave, whereby
his neck was broken. The grave was then filled
up, and Sir Robert returned to his castle.
Reports of this affair soon reached the ears of the
Abbot of Canterbury, who called upon the Sheriff
of Kent to set the law in motion against the
8 BYGONE KENT.
sacrilegious Knight of Shurland, with the result
that the sheriff summoned the posse couiitatus,
and, presenting himself before the gates of
Shurland Castle, demanded the surrender of the
murderer. The knight ordered the drawbridge
to be raised, and the portcullis to be lowered, and
set the sheriff at defiance. On the summons to
surrender being repeated, he sallied out at the
head of a dozen armed retainers, and put the
upholders of the law to fiight.
The Abbot thereupon appealed to the Pope,
and the Papal legate in London was instructed to
demand justice of the King, Sir Robert Shurland
being at the same time menaced with excommuni-
cation, Edward I. was then preparing for war
with Scotland, and the Knight took the
opportunity presented by the presence of the
royal barge on the coast to wait upon the
monarch. What he urged in extenuation of his
crime is not recorded ; but he received the royal
pardon, and probably cared little for any other
consequences. He had been knighted by
Edward for his gallant conduct at the siege of
Caerlaverock Castle, along with another brave
Kentish soldier, Sir John Hadloe, who derived
his name from the village now called Hadlow,
HISTORIC KENT. g
near Tunbridge, and whose castle and estate
there afterwards passed into the possession of a
family named Fane. The name of Shurland still
attaches to a mansion near Eastchurch, on the
right of the lane leading from Minster to Warden,
and the tomb of Sir Robert may be seen in
Minster Church.
Whether the person known in history as Wat
Tyler was an Essex man or a Kentish man has
never been determined, but it is certain that it
was upon Kentish soil that the insurrection which
he led in assertion of the rights of man against
the exercise of arbitrary and irresponsible power
reached its culmination. After an ineffectual
attack on Rochester Castle, the insurgents
marched to Blackheath, where, with the Essex
men, they are said to have numbered one hundred
thousand. Thence the Dartford tiler sent a
message to the King, who had taken refuge in
the Tower, asking for a conference with him.
Richard sailed down the river in the Royal barge
for that purpose, but the formidable aspect of the
insurgents deterred him from landing, and he
returned in fear to the Tower. The rest of the
story need hardly be given in detail in this place,
being treated indeed in another paper.
lo BYGONE KENT.
The doctrines of Wickliffe, which, preached by
John Ball, had no inconsiderable part in
promoting this movement of the serfs, were held
in some degree by both Henry IV. and his
father, the Duke of Lancaster, but the former, on
his usurpation of the throne adopted the view that
toleration of heresy was incompatible with the
due maintenance of order. Hence the enactment
of the law against heresy under which William
Sawtree, a London priest, was condemned to
death by fire by the convocation of Canterbury.
The same law in the following reign was put in
force against Lord Cobham, who was regarded as
the chief of the Lollards, then become a formid-
able body. He was indicted for heresy and
condemned to death, but escaped from the Tower
before the day appointed for his execution.
Subsequently becoming implicated in a political
conspiracy, he was arrested and hanged as a
traitor, his corpse being afterwards burned in
execution of the sentence formerly pronounced
upon him as a heretic.
The tendency towards greater purity of
religion continued, notwithstanding these persecu-
tions, and, in combination with other and less
laudable motives, brought about the religious
HISTORIC KENT. \ i
reformation of the sixteenth century. The dis-
solution of the monasteries was not, however,
regarded with general approval ; and, with the
view of reconciling the minds of the people to this
innovation, a commission was appointed to expose
the impostures which priests and monks had been
practising for centuries on the credulity of their
ignorant and superstitious flocks. Amongst these
was a large crucifix, kept at Boxley, in Kent, and
regarded with much reverence, the eyes, lips, and
head moving on the approach of its worshippers.
This was broken by the commissioners, and the
secret mechanism by which the movements had
been produced were exhibited to the public.
The shrine of Becket, commonly styled St.
Thomas of Canterbury, in Canterbury Cathedral,
was also destroyed, much to the regret of a large
section of the people. So great was the
veneration in which the memory of Becket was
held that it is recorded that while, in one year,
not a single penny was offered on the altar of
God, and only four pounds one shilling and
eightpence on that of the mother of Jesus, nine
hundred and fifty-four pounds six shillings and
threepence were offered at the shrine of Becket.
These exposures took away much of the odium
12 BYGONE KENT.
that attached to the reforming measures of Henry
VIII., and the minds of the people were quieted
by the representation that the king would now
be able to dispense with taxes, as the revenues of
the abolished abbeys and monasteries would
suffice for all the purposes of the State.
It was in this reign that the incidents of the
grimmest of Barham.'s Kentish ballads were
enacted, the scene being the gloomy passage in
the cathedral precinct at Canterbury known as the
" Dark Entry." The old house at the corner of
that long, narrow, paved court was then inhabited
by one of the canons, whose housekeeper was a
young woman named Ellen Bean, between whom
and her master an illicit connection was more than
suspected. One evening a young lady arrived at
the house, whom the canon introduced to his
friends as his niece, representing that her father had
gone abroad, confiding her to his guardianship.
Ellen Bean was not long, however, in arriving at
a different conclusion, and having, by watching
and listening, assured herself of the young lady's
frailty and the canon's infidelity to herself, she
administered poison to both, fatal results following
in a few hours. • Ellen Bean disappeared, and
was supposed to have been sent away. Her
HISTORIC KENT. 13
victims were yet unburied when it was rumoured
that persons passing through the Dark Entry had
heard subdued groans, which seemed to proceed
from beneath the flagstones, close to the canon's
house, one of which appeared to have been
recently removed and relaid. No investigation
appears to have been made, but about a century
afterwards, when the entry was being repaved, a
vault was discovered, at the bottom of which was
the skeleton of a woman, in a sitting position,
with a pitcher and a piece of pie crust beside it.
It was surmised that the remains were those of
Ellen Bean ; and that the canon's friends, being
assured of her guilt, and desirous to avoid the
scandal that must have resulted from a public
enquiry, had buried her alive, and placed a portion
of the poisoned pie in the vault, in order that if
the agonies of starvation prompted her to eat it,
she might suffer the torture endured by her victims.
Barham states that " a small maimed figure of a
female, in a sitting position, and holding some-
thing like a frying-pan in her hand, may still be
seen on the covered passage which crosses the
Brick Walk, and adjoins the house belonging to
the sixth prebendal stall."
Though some discontent had resulted in Kent,
14 BYGONE KENT.
as well as in other parts of the kingdom, from the
dissolution of the monasteries, or rather from the
social consequences of that measure, the men of
that county were not disposed to regard with
equanimity the restoration of Roman Catholicism
by Mary. The more prudent, indeed, of the
nobility and gentry thought it would be soon
enough to correct evils when they began to be
felt, but the warmer-blooded among them deemed
it easier to prevent grievances than to redress
them. Sir Thomas Wyatt, some remains of
whose castle at Allington may still be found,
joined with the Duke of Suffolk and others in a
conspiracy to depose Mary, liberate Lady Jane
Dudley from the Tower, and place her on
the throne. The plans of the conspirators
were not well executed, however, and the
enterprise was a failure. Wyatt and the duke
lost their heads, as did Lady Jane and her
husband, and the queen's authority, instead of
being shaken by the outbreak, was considerably
strengthened by its prompt suppression.
During the two following reigns the people of
Kent enjoyed peace, and even the commotions of
the Civil War only extended to this county when
the strife between King and Parliament had
HISTORIC KENT. 15
nearly reached its conclusion. In the spring of
1648, when the fortunes of Charles I. were almost
at their lowest ebb, the royalists resolved to make
a last desperate effort to restore them, Kent was
strongly Parliamentarian, but the gentry were, as
a rule, on the side of the King ; and Charles
being then in extremity, they convened meetings
at Canterbury and other places in the county, to
test the feelings of the people by raising the cry
of " God and the King ! " The moving spirit of
this movement was a gentleman named Hales,
who resided in the neighbourhood of Canterbury,
where he owned a considerable estate. The
avowed object of the meetings was the considera-
tion of grievances, under cover of which
associations were formed, arms collected, and
plans laid for a rising for the relief of the King.
The meetings were suppressed without difficulty
by the prompt action of Fairfax, who commanded
the Parliamentary forces in the south-east, but
the design of their promoters was not aban-
doned.
The crews of six ships of war lying at this time
in the Medway, and who probably had less
knowledge of the political condition of the
countrv than the dwellers in the towns, declared
1 6 BYGONE KENT.
for the King, and, in spite of the arguments and
remonstrances of Rainsborough and the Earl of
Warwick, the Lord High Admiral put to sea,
and sailed for Holland, the purpose of the
captains being to offer the command of the
squadron to the Duke of York, who was then at
the Hague. The Prince of Wales, on being
apprised of this movement, went himself to the
Hague, whence he returned with nineteen vessels,
and anchored in the Thames. Warwick avoided
an engagement, however, and all the efforts of
the princes to create a movement in London in
support of the royal cause proved unavailing.
In the meantime their friends in Kent had
mustered at Maidstone, and opposed a bold front
to Fairfax, who marched against them as soon as
the news of the rising reached him. For six
hours the royalists resisted the efforts of the
Parliamentary force to dislodge them, but at
length they were driven out of the town, leaving
two hundred of their supporters dead in the
streets, and twice that number prisoners. Those
who escaped returned at once to their homes.
There was another royalist force on the move,
however, under the command of the Earl of New-
port, who, on the day after the sanguinary conflict at
HISTORIC KENT. 17
Maidstone (June 2nd) advanced to Blackheath, in
the hope of being able to penetrate into London,
and strike a blow that might prove a turning-
point in the fortunes of the royal cause. This
plan they were prevented from carrying out by
the vigilance of General Skippon, who intercepted
their communication with the city ; and their
leader, deeming that nothing could be done in
Kent, where, indeed, his position soon became
precarious, crossed the Thames, and led his force
to Colchester.
Once more, in 1660, an English fleet sailed to
the shores of Holland to bring over the sons of
Charles I. No one could hav^e foreseen twelve
years before that they would so soon be welcomed
back to England. They landed at Dover, and
proceeded to London, where they were received
with every demonstration of joy. Four years
later, a Dutch fleet appeared in the Medway, and
spread consternation throughout the country. A
chain had been drawn across the river, and some
additions made to the defences of the banks ; but
these preparations were made in vain. Sheerness
was soon captured, and the Dutch ships sailed on,
breaking the chain, and overcoming the obstacles
presented by the ships sunk by order of the Duke
1 8 BYGONE KENT.
of Albemarle. Destroying all the shipping in
their passage, six warships and five fire-ships
advanced up the river as far as Upnor Castle,
where they burned three English ships of war.
It was expected that they would sail up the
Thames, and destroy all the shipping, and even
the city of London, but, owing to the failure of
the French fleet to support them, the Dutch
ships turned seaward, and after making a
hostile demonstration along the coast, returned to
their own ports.
Kent was not the scene of any other event of
importance in the national history until 1688, the
year of the flight of James II. from a kingdom
which he declined to govern constitutionally, and
which would not be governed after the manner of
his father. Leaving Whitehall by stealth, he
rode on a dark December night from the Thames
to the Med way, being conducted through by-ways
by a guide, and crossed the latter river by Ayles-
ford bridge. Changing his horse at Woolpeck,
he rode on to Elmley Ferry, near Faversham,
where he arrived at ten o'clock on the following
morning. There a hoy, hired by Sir Edward
Hales, lay ready to receive him ; but a strong
wind was blowing, and the vessel had no balkist
HISTORIC KENT. 19
on board. This omission being supplied at
Shilness, it was determined to sail as soon as the
tide served, it being then half-ebb ; but when the
vessel was nearly afloat she was boarded by the
crews of three fishing boats, who seized James
and his two companions, Hales and another, on
the pretext that they were Papists, seeking to
escape from the kingdom. Hales gave the
master fifty guineas, as an earnest of more should
he permit them to escape. He promised ; but,
instead of keeping his word, he took the rest of
their money, under the pretence of securing it
from the seamen, and then left them to their
fate.
The fugitives were at length taken in a coach
to Faversham, where, on their rank transpiring,
much commotion ensued. Sir James Oxendon came
with a company of militia to prevent the king's
escape. James contrived to send a letter to
London, which reached the Earl of Mulgrave,
and was by that nobleman read before the House
of Lords. The result was that the Earl of
Faversham was sent, with two hundred of the
Guards, to protect James and attend him
wherever he resolved to go. He chose now to
return to London, but a message was sent from
20 BYGONE KENT.
the Prince of Orange, desiring him to advance
no farther in that direction than Rochester. The
messenger missed James by the way, and the
latter went on to London. He found Dutch
soldiers guarding Whitehall, and he was
commanded to retire to Rochester. He obeyed,
and remained in that city three nights. At
midnight on the third day he left the house at
which he lodged, secretly, attended only by his
illegitimate son, the Duke of Berwick, and one
servant, and went in a boat to a smack which was
in readiness at Sheerness. Thence they sailed
for the coast of France, and early on the morning
of Christmas Day anchored before Ambleteuse,
from which port the fugitives posted to St.
Germain's, whither the queen had preceded them
before James fled from Whitehall.
Of the connection of Kent with more modern
history, of Atterbury's plot, of the long residence
of the Duke of W^ellington at Walmer, and so
forth, it is not necessary to treat here.
Ikcnttsb placc«*1Rame6.
By R. Stead, u.a., f.k.h.s.
IT is curious to observe with how Httle interest
the ordinary reader regards the names of the
rivers, hills, towns, villages, and what not, around
him. To the typical Englishman, even if of fair
education, the inner meaning of the place-names
he meets with is a matter of supreme indifference.
Yet listen to what the learned Canon Isaac
Taylor, one of our greatest authorities, has to say
on this subject : — " Local names, whether they
belong to provinces, cities, and villages, or are
the designations of rivers and mountains, are
never mere arbitrary sounds, devoid of meaning.
They may always be regarded as records of the
past, inviting and rewarding a careful historical
interpretation." And the Canon proceeds to say
that these local names "may indicate emigrations
— immigrations — the commingling of races by war
and conquest, or by the peaceful processes of
commerce ; the name of a district or a town may
22 BYGONE KENT.
speak to us of events which written history has
failed to commemorate." And there can be no
doubt that this is true in the fullest sense, and to
an extent hardly to be imagined by those who
have not thought much on this matter. The
name of even the obscurest hamlet, or lone
farm-house, or tiniest brook, may be " full-fraught
with instruction " to him who knows how to read
aright.
The fine old county of Kent presents attrac-
tions to many students, and not least of all
to the student of local names, and this for many
reasons. Here landed Ceesar and his Romans,
here St. Augustine first preached, and here was
the chief settlement of the Jutes. Then again,
the geographical modifications which the county
has undergone, and its proximity to the Continent
— always the "shortest and quickest route" —
lend additional interest to the study of Kentish
place-names ; to say nothing of the fact that
amongst these names are some of the queerest to
be found outside Wales and the Highlands.
Witness such philological nuts to crack as
Lympne and Lyminge, Reculver, Hardres,
Swaltenden, and a host of others.
The present short paper has no pretentions to
KENTISH PL A C EN AMES. 2 3
being the result of original research, and the
writer certainly does not propose to set up as an
"authority." What is here given may be got at
by anyone who will take the trouble to study
diligently such works as Canon Taylor's " Words
and Places," Edmund's " Names of Places,"
together with the writings of Kemble, Latham,
etc., in connection with a few of the old itineraries,
using the while a modern ordnance map, and not
forgetting to peep into Domesday Book. This
article will have served its purpose if it succeeds in
pointing out what rich stores of information may be
got out of a study of the names to be found on the
map of Kent, and in shewing that the subject is
anything but dry and forbidding.
The present volume is entitled '' Bygotic Kent,"
and certainly a study of our local names will often
carry us very far back into " bygone " times. It is
indeed hardly too much to say that if all the
written history of the country were lost, a diligent
study of the place-names would enable us to piece
together more than a little of the lost records.
Indeed local names often do supply the desired
information where no written account at all has
come down to us ; whilst it is interesting to note
how local names confirm the truth of trustworthy
24 BYGONE KENT.
historical records. The earHest inhabitants of
Kent, so far as written accounts go. were of
Celtic race, and their occupation is abundantly
shown to this day by the names they have left
behind them. To begin with, the very name of
the county is derived from the Celtic ccnn, a head,
certainly an appropriate name in every way for a
district of its configuration and position. Of its
rivers there are few which do not owe their
names to the same early race. The word dwr,
water, appears in Dour, Rother ( = Red Water),
and Darent, or Derwent as it once was. Stour is
probably a double word from is and divr, which
both mean water, whilst the lordly Thames itself
is almost certainly the Broad Water. In
Medway, Canon Taylor sees the Welsh word qwy
or wy, water. Then Romney is said to be from
ricimne, a marsh, so that the name Romney
Marsh means something very like the Marsh
Marsh. In South Wales there is another
Romney, though usually it is spelt Rhymney.
The very common cum, meaning a hollow, is still
represented in Kent in its Saxonized form of
Combe. We have several farms of the name in
the county. And here I may say, particularly,
that often the most interesting of all place-names,
KENTISH PLACE-NAMES. 25
and the best worth studying, are those of isolated
farms and remote hamlets. Not seldom these
places have a history dating back far beyond that
of the great towns. Kent is full of such outlying
farmsteads and hamlets, as a glance at the
ordnance map will shew — Terlingham, Conicks,
Scuttington, Wadling, Rhoads, Edings, Yonsee,
and hundreds more.
But on the whole the proportion of Celtic
names is not large in Kent, and this is just what
history would lead us to expect. What with one
invasion and another — by Romans, Teutons, and
Northmen — our Celtic predecessors must have had
a hard time of it, and no wonder they went
further westward, and left their lands to others.
Probably hardly five per cent, of our local names
are of Celtic origin, and what we have are in
nearlv all cases the names of natural features.
Possibly the Latinised Dubris and Reoulbiuni,
our modern Dover and Reculver, were Roman
attempts to render earlier Celtic names. And
Canon Jenkins is of opinion that Lyminge repre-
sents the Celtic Heol Maen (Stone Street), the
old form est Limming (or cet Lemaen) would
mean near the Stone Street, a description which
certainly suits the place exactly.
26 BYGONE KENT.
Notwithstanding an occupation of several hun-
dred years, the Romans left behind them few
traces in the way of place-names. Rochester, of
course, occurs at once to the mind, as well as
Stone Street, just mentioned (Latin Strata), and
Watling Street. Such places as Minster date
only from later times, after the introduction of
Christianity into England.
To come to the immediate ancestors of the
" Men of Kent," the Jutish section of the Saxon
invaders, it is probable that not less than ninety
per cent, of the local place-names are of Anglo-
Saxon origin. If we owe the name of the county
to the Celtic race, at all events two-thirds of the
name of its venerable city, Canterbury, are Saxon.
To the Latinised form of Cenn, Cantium, the
Saxons added wara, inhabitants, thus getting Cant-
ware, the men of Kent. To this was placed by rig,
burgh, thus we get Cantwarabyrig, the "burgh of
the men of Kent," or better still the "town of the
men of the headland." We still have " Edward W.
Cantuar'^
But the most striking thing about Kentish
names, and a thing which the general reader can
hardly fail to notice, is the enormous number of
them indicating a densely-wooded country.
KENTISH PLACE-NAMES. 27
There they are, hursts, leys, dens, charts, holts,
fields, and so forth, in bewildering numbers, and
nearly all of these are Anglo-Saxon names,
except perhaps den, which would possibly be
better classed as Celto-Saxon.
Let us begin with the hursts — Chislehurst,
Penshurst, Hawkhurst, Staplehurst, Shadoxhurst,
and others in plenty. This "hurst" is. the
Anglo-Saxon hyrst (wood), in a slightly more
modern dress. Another wonderfully favourite
ending in Kentish place-names is the den just
mentioned, meaning a thicket, or wooded valley.
Let anyone examine the portion of the map of
Kent to the south of the railway line
from Tunbridge to Ashford, and he will find a
perfect swarm of these dens — Tenterden, Halden,
Smarden, Frittenden, Marden, and so on
ad libittim. Again, scattered up and down the
country, we find plenty of names with ley for their
termination. This "lev" is akin to the modern
lie, and is indicative of a clearing in the forest —
where the wood has been laid, or the cattle love
to lie. In these clearings, of course, our Teuton
ancestors often built their houses, and thus formed
the nucleus of many a village or town. So we get
Bromley, Bickley, Swanley, all within sight
28 BYGONE KENT.
almost of London, with plenty of others more
remote, like Calverley, Idley, Willesley, Tudeley.
But we have by no means exhausted the names
telling of forest-land. There is hot, or liolt,
which means a copse, or gentle slope covered
with scrub. These are not as numerous in Kent
as they are further west, but we have Knockholt,
Calshot, and perhaps others. In Highfield,
Matfield, Ensfield, we have places where the trees
had h^^n felled. The charts peculiar to two or
three of the south-eastern counties deserve men-
tion. Says Dr. Isaac Taylor, "the word chart is
identical with the word hart (wood or forest) we
find in such German names as Hartz Mountains."
In Kent we have Chartham, Chart- Sutton, Great
Chart, and Little Chart. We have still left an
abundance of such isolated but suggestive
names as Mapleton, Sevenoaks, Ashenfield,
Broad Oak.
Now to what does all this point } Undoubtedly
to this fact, that a very large portion of the
county was once covered with dense forest. This
we should know even if there were no written
record of the fact. But we learn from historical
sources that a very large portion of Kent, Sussex,
Surrey, and Hampshire was once covered with an
KENTISH PLACE-NAMES. 29
immense forest called Andresleah, or the
" Untrodden Forest." This is now called the
" Weald," a word akin to wold (Cotswolds, etc.),
from the German wald, a wood. "In the
Weald almost every local name, for miles and
miles, terminates in hurst, ley, den, or fields
Canon Taylor gives a most interesting analysis of
the forest-names of the district. In the Kentish
Weald alone, there are '^2i " hursts," 42 "dens,"
22 "leys," I "holt," and 19 "fields," or a total of
117 such names, all in an area of a few square
miles. It is curious to note, too, says the learned
Canon, that the great family of Howard
(hog-warden) first turns up in Kent, that is,
amongst the woods, just where one would have
expected it. The other form of the name.
Hay ward, is common enough yet in Kent, and so
is Woodward (forest- warden), whilst the Hogbens
seem very unlikely to die out in the old
county.
A very common ending in Kentish local names is
ing, often followed by some other termination like
ham, or ton. This ing was a patronymic, and
meant much the same as Mac in Scotland, or Ap
in Wales, An old writer speaks of the people of
Kent as " Centings." Authorities think that
30 BYGONE KENT.
when the endinsf iito- stands alone we have the
original settlement of the clan or family, but
where there is a suffix (like ham) it marks a filial
colony sent out from the parent settlement. In
Kent we have these original family settlements at
Selling, where were found the " Sillings, a Vandal
tribe, mentioned by Ptolemy," at Harling, where
were the Harlings ; and others at Bobbing,
Stelling, Mailing ; whilst offshoots from the parent
settlements are met with at Hastingleigh,
Godington, and twenty or thirty more. Indeed it
is said that Kent boasts of twenty-two parent
settlements (a larger number than any other
county, just as might have been expected in a
district so early settled) and twenty-nine filial
colonies. A curious variation of the termination
ing is found in Lyminge, Ottinge, Sellinge,
Arpinge, Hawkinge, and a few more.
It is worth while to look for a moment at the
very important modifications in the contour of the
county, and see how these have affected the
place-nomenclature. Some portions of the
district adjoining the Thames are damp enough
for ordinary people even now, but how waterlogged
the whole locality must have been formerly may
be clearly seen by looking at the place-names.
KENTISH FLA CE-NA MES. 3 1
Marshes in plenty there are, Plumstead, Crayford,
Dartford, Cowling, St. Mary's. There we have
Marsh Street, and such names as Sheppey,
Chitney, Graveney. This termination ey (or ed)
indicates an island, or land so water-begirt as to
be practically an island.
Of the Goodwin Sands, and the encroachments
of the sea on the coast thereabout, nothing need
be said, as " every school-boy " knows all about it.
If anyone wants to see "what the envious siege
of watery Neptune " can do, let him start at
Folkestone Harbour, and follow the coastline
eastwards for a mile or two. But we will rather
pass on to an instance or two of an opposite
character, that is where the sea has lost ground, as
an Irishman might say ; we still speak of the Isle
of Thanet, and everybody knows in a vague sort
of way that it was once really an island, though
how or when or why it ceased to be one in any
true sense is known to far fewer people. Yet
ships once entered from the North Sea, near
Sandwich, and sailed along the broad channel
which then separated Thanet from the mainland,
coming out into the mouth of the Thames, near
Reculver. Sandwich (Sandybay) and Rich-
borough were famous ports in early times, whilst
32 BYGONE KENT.
Ebbfleet was one till a comparatively recent date.
If we knew nothing of all this from history we
could still gather much of it from a careful study
of local names. Starting from Pegwell Bay and
going westward, let us note a few of these names.
To Sandwich allusion has just been made.
Ebbfleet is now quite half a mile from any tide,
and Durlock, meaning zvater-lake, is now over
half a mile from the sea. [This is not the only
Durlock in Kent, the district overlooking Folke-
stone Harbour, on the East Cliff, is still called the
Durlocks]. Then there come Marshborough,
Marsh House, West Marsh, Stodmarsh, Ash
Marsh, Elmstone Marsh, which must have been
named later on, when the great channel had to a
considerable extent disappeared. The most
noteworthy name, however, is perhaps Stour-
mouth, which village is now a tolerably fair before-
breakfast walk, say some five or six miles, from
the sea, but at which place it is evident the river
Stour once emptied itself into the German Ocean.
Chislet, from the word ckesel, shingle, was once a
shingle island, just as we have Chelsea, anciently
Chesel-ea, also a shingle island. Fordwich. or
Fordwick. which means " the bay on the arm of
the sea," near Canterbury, was formerly the port
KENTISH PLACE-NAMES. 33
of Canterbury, and a corporate town. Clearly a
branch of the great channel ran eastwards to that
place. And then there is Olantigh, half-way
between Canterbury and Ashford, whose earlier
and perhaps better form, Olantige, shows that in
former times it must have been an island. A
worthy inhabitant of Wye, with whom the present
writer was conversing on the subject, stoutly
refused to believe that Olantigh was ever an
island, or that the seawater ever came anywhere
near the place, but the evidence furnished by the
name is too strong for him.
Few districts better repay a study respecting
its place-names than the far-famed Romney
Marsh. History informs us that Lymne (or
Lympne, as some prefer it) was once a famous
Roman port — indeed, next to Richborough, the
most important in Kent. It is to be feared that
Lymne has small chance of ever being a port
again. It is now a mile and a half or two miles
from the shore. But this is not all. Appledore,
now some half a dozen miles from any part of the
present coast, was formerly a maritime town, and
the name, from Celtic sources, is said to mean
"waterpool." It is clear, therefore, that an arm
of the sea must have extended from Lymne to
D
34 BYGONE KENT.
Appledore, and there are good reasons for
thinking that this channel was practically the
same as that of the now dried-up river Limene.
When the channel silted up, both Appledore and
Lymne decayed, and the newer port of West
Hythe sprang up, which in its turn gave
place to the modern Hythe, — it is to be noted
that Hythe is not Celtic, like Lymne and
Appledore, but Saxon. Hythe tries hard
to keep itself to the shore, but it will have to
succumb. As a port it is now a thing of
the past, being many hundreds of yards from
the sea, whilst West Hythe is more than a
mile as the crow flies. So much for the fringe of
Romney Marsh. If we come to the district itself,
a glance at the names between the modern
Military Canal and Dungeness will show how
comparatively recently much of the district has
become habitable. We cannot do better than fall
back upon Canon Taylor again. " Throughout
the greater portion of the Marsh the local names
are purely English (or modern) such as
Ivychurch, Fairfield, Brookland, and Newchurch.
In a few of the more elevated spots the names
are Saxon or Celtic, as Winchelsea, or Romney,
whilst it is only when we come to the inland
KENTISH FLA CE-NAMES. 3 5
margin of the marsh that we meet with a fringe
of ancient names like Lymne or Appledore,
which show the existence of continuous habitable
land in the times of the Romans or the Celts."
The change in the character of Romney Marsh is
shewn, too, by the fact that the river Rother,
which now runs into Rye Harbour, to the west of
Dungeness, formerly emptied itself into the sea
some distance to the east, or rather to the north
of that headland.
The Danish or Norse element which forms so
conspicuous a feature in the local names of some
of the eastern counties, such as Lincolnshire, is
not so plentiful in the place-names of Kent.
Indeed this county has about as small a proportion
as any of the names derived from the Northmen.
Still we have a few. An interesting instance is
the termination gate, which so often occurs : —
Ramsgate, Margate, Kingsgate, Northgate,
Sandgate. In Romney Marsh this word
becomes gut, as Romney Marsh Gut, Jew's Gut,
Marsland Gut, Globesden Gut, and so on. In
every case these gates ov guts are passages down
to the sea, and the word originally meant the way
one goes. A man's gait is still the way he goes.
The Indian word Ghaut is derived from the same
36 BYGONE KENT.
root. Deptford is the "deep reach," whilst the
wicks were probably stations of pirates — Wick,
Sandwich, Greenwich (the " green reach,")
Woolwich (the "hill reach,") and so on. Walton
is probably the "walled enclosure," and in the
parish of Chartham we have Danesbanks.
Characteristic Norse names in ness (nose)
abound, like Sheerness, Dungeness, Shellness,
Foreness, Whiteness, Ness Corner. Dungeness,
or Dengeness, is perhaps Dengeyness, or Danes'
Island Head. That the Northmen made pretty
frequent settlements along the Kentish coast is
certain ; and who knows how much of the
proverbial seafaring skill and hardihood of the
Kentish boatmen and fishermen is due to the
admixture of old "Sea Rover" blood in their
veins ?
Considering its proximity to the Continent, it
is remarkable that there is so little of French or
Norman-French in the Kentish place-nomen-
clature. Here and there we find a Capel-le-Ferne
or a Wickhambreaux, but the number of such
instances is small. On the other hand, it is most
interesting to note that Anglo-Saxon names
abound on the French coast near Boulogne. Com-
pare the Sangatte, Lozinghem, Wimille, Ham,
KENTISH PLACE-NAMES. 37
and so forth, of the opposite coast with our
Kentish Sandgate, Lossingham, Windmill, Ham.
And such English-looking names as Warhem
(Warham), Hollebeque (Holbeck), Maninghem
(Manningham), Colincthun (Collington), Wer-
wick (Warwick), are as plentiful as blackberries
in the Calais-Boulogne-St Omer District. Were
our corresponding English settlements made
from France, or did we colonise that corner of
our continental neighbour's country ? It would
occupy too much space to give in full the pros
and cons ; suffice it to say there is good reason to
think that the French corner was colonised from
England, and that as a matter of fact the colonists
set sail from somewhere near the Kentish Hythe.
In short, we owe but little in the way of place-
names to France ; it is all the other way ; to our
colonisation France owes a multitude of its
village settlements, in its north-eastern corner at
least.
One is sorely tempted before closing this
short and inadequate paper to attempt to crack
some of the hard philological nuts presented by
some of our local names, but we must forbear.
The way of the philologer is hard, yet there are
few things we more easily drift into than deriva-
38 BYGONE KENT.
tion. As a witty member of the English
Dialect Society has said, "every man thinks he
can drive and derive'' But a large series of
disasters in both driving and deriving has taught
the present writer to be wary in attempting either,
lest haply in the latter art he should tumble into
some of the delightful pitfalls into which of yore
fell dear old Lambarde, the Kentish Perambu-
lator.
St auQustinc anb bie flDieeion.
By the Rev. Geo. S. Tyack, b.a.
THE latter half of the sixth century found
England almost wholly heathen still. It is
true that long before that date Christianity had
made its way into the island, whether through the
preaching of S. Paul, the labours of S. Joseph of
Arimathea and his companions, in answer to the
prayers of King Lucius, or by what other now
forgotten means, we cannot say. Certain,
however, it is that there were British martyrs, as
S. Alban, in the Diocletian persecution (a.d. 303),
and British bishops present at the Councils of
Aries (a.d. 314), Sardica (a.d. 347) and
Ariminum (a.d. 360). The next century saw a
change. From the stormy shores of the Baltic
the English sea-kings came down upon the land,
now left defenceless by the Roman power ; like
the successive waves of an incoming flood they
swept across it, driving before them or destroying
almost every vestige of what was character-
istically British, and covering the land with their
40 BYGONE KENT.
own masterful being, rugged, daring, and withal
heathen ; until at length all that was left of the
British Church was to be found only amid the
wild hills of Wales and Cornwall, like drift-wood
at the water's edge, marking the utmost limit of
the advancing tide.
For some unexplained reason no effort was
made^ by this remnant to convert their English
conquerors to the Faith. Whether their resent-
ment at their sufferings overcame their Christian
charity, or the continuance of a desultory conflict
gave no opportunity of intercourse, or whether
the civil strifes into which we are told they fell
amongst themselves, was the hindrance, we can
only conjecture ; the Venerable Bede, however,
reckons it " amongst other most wicked actions "
of which in this time of distress they were guilty,
" that they never preached the faith to the Saxons
or English who dwelt amongst them."
The work thus neglected was to be taken up
nevertheless by others. We need not tell again
the oft-told tale of S. Gregory's noticing the
group of fair-haired slaves in the Roman market,
and of the holy humour with which he punned
upon the names of their country and their king,
but we pass rather to the fulfilment of the sacred
ST. AUGUSTINE AND HIS MISSION 41
ambition which was that day born within the
saint's breast.
It was not until some years later that Gregory
was able to take steps for the conversion of the
English, and by that time the calls of other duties
— he was then Bishop of Rome — prevented his
personally undertaking the mission. As abbot of
the Monastery of S. Andrew on the Ccelian Hill,
he had had ample opportunity of judging the
worth and work of Augustine, the prior, and him
he chose to whom to confide the responsibility of
this task.
The band of missionaries, consisting of about
forty monks, traversed Provence, stayed for
a while in the Isle of Lerins, and at length, after
some doubts and delays, caused by the account
given them of the roughness of the English
nation, landed in the Isle of Thanet on the
7th August, 596.
Thanet was then far more entitled to the name
of isle than it is to-day. Bede gives the following
description of it: "On the east of Kent is the
large isle of Thanet, containing, according to the
English way of reckoning, six hundred families,
divided from the other land by the River
Wantsum, which is about three furlongs over.
42 BYGONE KENT.
and fordable only in two places, for both ends of
it run into the sea;" and even as late as the
sixteenth century, John Twyne says of the stream
which insulates it, " There be right creditable
persons now living that have often seen not only
small boats, but vessels of good burden to pass to
and fro upon the Wantsum, where now the water,
especially towards the west, is clear excluded ;
and there be apparent marks that Sarr, where
they now go over, was a proper haven." Within
this island, therefore, S. Augustine and his
company waited until the king should give them
an audience, or signify his pleasure concerning
them.
The condition of things in the kingdom of
Kent was not unfavourable for the foundation of
the faith, nor for its extension from that centre.
Ethelbert, the king, had taken to wife Bertha,
daughter of Charibert, King of Paris, who had
stipulated at the marriage that she should be
permitted the full enjoyment of the Christian
religion, in which she had been brought up ;
Luidhard, Bishop of Senlis, was therefore present
at the Kentish Court as her chaplain, and both
from him and from the queen, Ethelbert must
often have heard something of the mysteries of
ST. AUGUSTINE AND HIS MISSION.
43
their faith. Moreover, the King's influence
extended beyond the Hmits of his own dominions,
ST. AUGUSTINE — FROM THE DOOR OF THE CHAl'TER-HOUSE, ROCHESTER.
since he held the position of Bretwalda, — the
third who had been advanced to that dignity
— and thus exercised some degree of over
44 BYGONE KENT.
lordship over all the country south of the
H umber.
S. Gregory the Great, writing to Bertha,
intimates that it was understood that " an anxious
desire " had arisen among her people for admission
to the Church, and suggests that she " ought early
to have inclined her husband favourably " towards
her own faith ; it is therefore most probable that
when at last the missionaries came into the royal
presence, Ethelbert was prepared to give them
something more than an impartial hearing ; nor
did they, on their part, as they advanced to meet
him, chanting a pathetic litany, and preceded by
a silver cross and a crucifix painted on a panel,
fail to make use of the opportunity afforded them
of at once impressing his mind with the beauty
and solemnity of the message they had come to
bring. The result of the important conference
that followed was as favourable as, from a first
interview, could have been looked for ; the monks
were permitted to cross to the mainland and take
up their residence in the royal city of Canterbury ;
provision was there made for their sustenance,
and leave was granted them to preach and to
make converts.
Two buildings, still existing, recall the early
ST. AUGUSTINE AND HIS MISSION 45
days of S. Augustine's life in Canterbury. The
first is the Stable Gate, which is said to have
been the first home of his little company in the
city. The second is S. Martin's Church.
" There was on the east side of the city," says
that father of English history already quoted,
"a church dedicated to the honour of S. Martin,
built whilst the Romans were still in the island,
wherein the Queen used to pray ; in this they
first began to meet, to sing, to pray, to say mass,
to preach, and to baptize, until the King, being
converted to the Faith, allowed them to preach
openly, and to build or repair churches in all
places." Towards the little church of S. Martin,
whose bells still call to prayer, and thanksgiving,
and the Holy Sacrifice, within whose walls so
many generations of the faithful have met to
worship, the thoughts of all Englishmen, but
especially of the men of Kent, must turn as they
recall the landmarks still left to us of the Bygone
Days, Much, if not all, of the present building
dates only from the thirteenth century, but the
later builders were evidently largely indebted to
their predecessors for their materials, the walls
being full of Roman bricks which formed part of
the church, where was heard the voice of S.
46 BYGONE KENT.
Augustine singing the holy offices or preaching to
the heathen ; within which, two centuries earher,
ere Rome's Empire crumbled to decay, priests
and people now nameless to us met to '' sing
hymns to Christ as God."
The conversion and baptism of King Ethelbert
not only allowed S. Augustine to seek other and
larger centres for his work, but even compelled
him to do so, for the multitude was not slow
in following the royal example ; but a good
foundation having thus been laid, the head of the
mission returned to France before proceeding to
build further upon it, and obtained episcopal
consecration at the hands of Virgilius, Archbishop
of Aries.
The second church provided for the growing
community of Christians was also an ancient
British church, desecrated and in ruins ; this the
new-made bishop repaired and enlarged, and
constituted it the cathedral, or episcopal seat, for
his diocese, under the name of Christ Church.
The magnificent pile, which now forms the
metropolitan Church of England, was commenced
by Lanfranc (1070- 1092), the thirty-third
archbishop, and has grown under the hands of
successive occupants of the see to its present
ST. AUGUSTINE AND HIS MISSION. 47
dignity ; yet it is thought by some to enshrine
part of that humbler building which contained the
rude throne of the first of the long; line* of
archbishops of Canterbury. The walls of the
crypt proclaim its great age, and it is this part of
the cathedral which is said to have come down to
us, through all the storms that have more than
once wholly or in part wrecked the greater
church above it, as a memorial of the times of
King Ethelbert and S. Augustine.
So rapidly spread the effects of the missionaries'
work among the people that at Christmas, 697, less
than eighteen months after their landing, more than
10,000 persons were baptized at the mouth of the
Medway, opposite Sheppey. The news of the
conversion of the king, and of the progress of the
work, brought from Rome a crowd of additional
helpers, and the outward signs of the victory of the
Cross became more and more evident in the city.
A third ancient church, which had been
degraded into a heathen temple, was cleansed and
re-dedicated to its original use under the name of
S. Pancras, and near it rose a monastery for the
accommodation of the missionary-monks. One
religious house they already possessed, for
* The present archbishop (Dr. Benson) is the 92nd.
48 BYGONE KENT.
Ethelbert had given up to their use his palace,
which lay hard by the new cathedral. The second
monastery, destined to be one of the greatest and
most famous of abbeys, was seven years in
building, but the founder was "not to see its
consecration, which took place under Laurentius,
his companion and successor. It was at first
dedicated to the Apostles S. Peter and S. Paul,
but Dunstan, the twenty-third archbishop,
added the name of S. Augustine, and this title
has supplanted the rest. Many have been the
changes in its fortunes ; it has been abbey, royal
hall, and bishop's palace, and now, not inappro-
priately it forms a college of missionary students.
It will be seen from the above notes that the
footprints of S. Augustine are to be found all
over his ancient city of Canterbury, but his work
spread beyond that city, or indeed the kingdom of
Kent. By the aid of Ethelbert a second see was
founded within his domains, and Julius, one of
S. Augustine's first helpers, was made the first
bishop of Rochester. The cathedral, built chiefly
by Bishop Gundulf (1077-1108) was dedicated
to S. Andrew, in memory of that monastery at
Rome, whence the first company of missionaries
came to Kent ; and the majestic figure of S.
ST. AUGUSTINE AND IIJS MISSION. 49
Augustine, bearing the cross staff of an
Archbishop, still stands without the Chapter door.
Westward and northward the light spread from
Kent into the surrounding kingdoms, so that even
far Northumbria for a brief space caught its
gleams. With all the questions of ritual and
theology that arose between the Italian priests
and the British Church, and with the details of
their labours beyond the borders of Kent, we
must not trouble the reader of the present volume.
One word only will we add as to his claim to the
title "Apostle of the English." It must be
remembered that not all of England, much less of
Great Britain, was touched by his work ; the
English never penetrated to Cornwall, Wales, or
Scotland, and these people owe little or nothing
directly to the mission of S. Augustine ; moreover
his work, or that of his assistants, north of the
H umber, was superficial and shortlived, so that in
a few years time it had to be re-commenced from
the foundation. From lona came a band of
devoted men, whose simple lives and burning
words brought the knowledge of the Faith to
northern England, and who may fairly claim an
equal share with S. Augustine in the Apostleship
of the English.
50 BYGONE KENT.
The great S. Gregory was called to his rest
early in 605, and but two months later his friend
and follower, S. Augustine, laid down the
weapons of life's warfare. His body was laid
within his monastery at Canterbury, whence S.
Dunstan removed it to the Cathedral.
^be IRuineb Cbapele anb Cbantrice of
1kent.
By Geo. M. Arnold, j.p., d.l., f.s.a.
S. Katharine, Shorne.
IN the year 1890 I observed a small freehold
property was advertised for sale by auction,
and in the particulars of sale it was thus described :
" The property comprises a comfortable old-
fashioned residence in good repair, whilst
adjoining and in the rear is an HUClCnt (Tbapcl)
supposed to have been formerly occupied by
Monks, and visited by the Pilgrims on their way
to the Shrine of Thomas a Beckett."
Attracted by this description, I instructed my
agent to purchase it, and having removed the
stalls and mangers from the interior, and cleared
it of manure and rubbish, I proceeded to explore
its history, but found none, and that all
records were silent upon it, with the exception
that Mr. John Thorpe inserted the following
account of its appearance as an oast-house in 1774,
52 BYGONE KENT.
accompanied by a plate. His work, known as
the Customale Roffense, was published 1788.
" On the right hand of the road leading up to
Shorne Street, and opposite Mr. Maplesden's
house, stands an antient and fair chapel or
oratory ; which, with some additional building, is
now used as a malt-house, and a small tenement
erected against the east end of it, inhabited by the
maltman. I was informed by an antient and
creditable person there that in digging the
foundation of the new building or lean-to, a stone
coffin and many human bones were disturbed.
On the north side is a small orchard, which
probably was the cemetery to it. This edifice has
not been mentioned by any writer, nor have I
been able hitherto to meet with anything relative
to its foundation and endowment."
After considerable research I discovered that
the little building had been suppressed as a
chantry under the statute of the i Edward VI.,
and had thereupon probably become abandoned
and derelict, that it had been included in a
Commission of Queen Elizabeth for the discovery
of "concealed lands," and having been returned
by the Commissioners as falling within their
powers, was found to be known as the little chapel
RUINED CHAPELS AND CHANTRIES. 53
of S. Katharine, of small value, and was
accordingly comprised in one of their omnibus
deeds (as we should now call them) of sale, in
which the lands of many pious persons (confiscated
under the statute) were gathered together and
appropriated to Secular purposes in return for
money, fee farm rents, or other financial
considerations.
As these official documents have been given by
the Kent Archaeological Society to the public this
year, in a paper written by me, I do not purpose
here to dwell further upon them. The building
now will be made safe from any further inroads of
adverse weather, and from more direct mischief
at the hands of Man.
In the progress of the above researches it
occurred to me that the existing references to the
various decayed and ruined Kentish Chantries, were
few and not easily brought together, and that it
would interest many if this collection was now made,
accompanied by any original remarks or reference
to authentic records relevant to the subject, and
thus I came to place the following notes at the
service of the editor of " Bygone Kent," not
without an earnest hope that they would lead to
enquiry into these small but interesting ruins, and
54 BYGONE KENT.
where it was not too late, to take measures for
their preservation, but anyhow in the expectation
that they would at least keep the memory of
them to the fore, and not improbably lead to the
discovery of what remains still unknown or
obscure in reference to their past history.
We are indebted to the painstaking industry of
the late Mr. John Thorpe for the means of now
reproducing views (as they existed in his time) of
several of these our smaller Ecclesiastical. Build-
ings in Kent.
Rochester Bridge Chapel of All Souls,
established in what was the then narrow lane
(upon which it conferred the designation of
Chapel Lane) leading to the east end of the
then " new bridge " of Rochester. This chapel is
mentioned by Thorpe in his Customale Roffense,
page 150, and was founded and endowed by John
de Cobham and Sir Robert Knowles.
It was customary at those periods to erect
chapels or chantries at or near either end of
important fords or hazardous ferries, and this
chapel, which was called Allesolven or Allsouls,
seemed to have been designed chiefly for the use
of travellers and wayfarers. By the foundation
RUINED CHAPELS AND CHANTRIES. 55
charter the three chaplains who were to officiate
within its walls were to be appointed by the Wardens
of the bridge, and were to pray for the soul of John
de Cobham, and for the souls of the benefactors
of the bridge, and for certain other specified
individuals, and generally for all faithful people.
Under the statute of King Edward VI.,
BRIDGE CHAPEL, ROCHESTER (sOUTH-EAST VIEW').
referred to in relation to St. Katharine,
Shorne, it was enacted that " all sums of money
and emoluments which by virtue of any assurance
had been given or applied, to have continuance
for ever ; which in any one year within five years
next before the beginning of this present
parliament, have been paid, or bestowed, by any
Corporation, Guilds, Fraternities, Companies,
56 BYGONE KENT.
Fellowships of Mysteries, or Crafts, etc., toward
or about the finding maintenance or sustentation
of any priest, or priests, of any anniversary, or
obit, lamp, light, or lights, or other like thing ;
shall go to our said Lord the King, his heirs and
successors for ever ; to be yearly as a rent charge
at the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel and
the Annunciation of our Lady," etc., but it
appears that from some cause or other, possibly
in view of some such legislation being imminent,
the chapel had already ceased to be used or to
depend upon these stipends. This is shewn by a
plea in the Exchequer of the XIX Queen
Elizabeth, where the Queen's Attorney-General
sued the Wardens of the bridge for no less a sum
than ^513, being the accumulations of ^18 per
annum (the stipends of £6 each which used to be
paid to the three chaplains) for twenty-eight and
a half years then last past. The Attorney-
General contended that the total claim was
forfeited, and due to the Queen by virtue of the
above act of Edward VI. for dissolving chantries.
It did not appear, however, to the jury that any
service had been performed there, or at all events
that any stipend had been actually paid to any
chaplain or chantry priest by the bridge authorities
RUINED CHAPELS AND CHANTRIES. 57
for officiating there, for five years next before the
passing of the said act (which was an essential
requisite according to the Hmitation therein
specified), and so a verdict was given in favour of
the Wardens, The case shews the tenacity with
which the pursuit of the confiscated property was
often-times conducted. Tiie circumstance that
this Exchequer suit by Queen EHzabeth, against
the bridge Wardens was lost in consequence of
the defendants being able to shew that the priests'
stipends had not been maintained during the
period of five years before the session of 1547,
induced me to investigate the suppression of the
adjacent parish church of S. Clement, within
which parish the bridge chapel was situate — a
suppression effected by the Statute 2 and 3 of the
same King, cap. 17.
The enactment, which has not, I think, been
printed, but which I have consulted in the
parliamentary rolls at Westminster, after reciting
that S. Clement's was so small that the parish
had had no incumbent for some years, in
consequence of which the King had lost his first-
fruits, or tenths, and the inhabitants had no
church ministrations ; proceeds to enact that the
parish of S. Clement be united to the parish of S.
58 BYGONE KENT.
Nicholas, and that William Harrison, the then
present incumbent of S. Nicholas, should be the
incumbent of both parishes, and all payments
were to be due to him, while he was to pay the
King his first-fruits and tenths. The furniture,
etc., was to be appropriated to S. Nicholas, as the
Bishop of Rochester and the Mayor of Rochester
should arrange.
These circumstances seem indirectly to
corroborate the accuracy of the line of defence
set up by the wardens.
That the chapel was not extra parochial is clear
from the language of John de Cobham, the
founder, addressed to the Bishop. "Therefore I,
the said John, desiring by the divine mercy
heavenly treasure, and knowing that naked I
came from my mother's womb, and naked shall I
return unto the dust of the earth ; and that we
shall reap alone that which we have sown ; have
established a certain perpetual chantry in the
chapel next the bridge of the city of Rochester,
within the parish of the parish church of S.
Clement's in the same city situate." The view
annexed is that supplied by Thorpe, but the
chapel has since been cleared by the recent but
praiseworthy action of the Bridge Corporation,
RUINED CHAPELS AND CHANTRIES. 59
and this at the instance, I believe, of my
brother, Mr. Arnold, the Bridge Clerk, to whom
the Kent Archaeological Society is indebted in its
XVII. vol. for several very interesting papers
bearing upon the bridge and its estates.
S. Lawrence de Longsole.
This chapel at Allington, higher up the river
Medway, is situate towards the south-west limits
of the parish, and was formerly called the Free
Chapel, or Chantry, or Hermitage of S. Lawrence
de Langsole, otherwise Longsole, and so
designated probably from being near to if not
erected upon Longsole Heath.
The owners of the Castle and Manor of
Allington seem to have been the general, if not
the constant, patrons of this chapel, and the farm
attached to the chapel was known as the
*' Hermitage " Farm in the time of Thorpe.
It may be interesting to mention that John,
Bishop of Rochester, issued from Southfleet,
under date 22nd September, 1422, a commission
to enquire whether this chapel was really in
Aylesford or in Allington, since the right to the
offerings made at it, on the Vigil and Feast of S.
Lawrence (its patron Saint) was in dispute
6o BYGONE KENT.
between the Vicar of Aylesford and the Rector of
AlHngton.
EsLiNGHAM Chapel, Frindsburv.
In reference to the Chapel of EsHngham,
Hugh de St. Clare, Lord of the Manor, obtained
from Bishop Gundulph a grant of a Free Chapel
within that Manor. This first structure perished,
and the chapel was rebuilt in the time of John
(the second Bishop of Rochester of that name, who
was consecrated Bishop of Rochester a.d. 1137),
and between that year and a.d. i 144 he dedicated
it in honour of " S. Peter, the chief of the
apostles," and confirmed all the privileges which
Bishop Gundulph had granted to Hugh de St.
Clare in respect of it.
The chapel is stated by Thorpe to have been
" a massive stone building with Gothic windows
and iron bars."
It seems to have been about thirty feet in length
by about twenty feet in width, and stood east
and west on the side of the yard south of
the dwelling-house, and was used as an oast
house, but becoming ruinous " was pulled down
in the year 1772, and a new oast erected near
the spot." There are now no traces of it above
the surface.
RUINED CHAPELS AND CHANTRIES. 6i
The Chapel of S. Margaret, Helle, Darenth.
The Chapel of S. Margaret, Helle, is situate in
Darenth, and according to the account of it which
the Reverend Samuel Denne (the Vicar) supplied
to Mr. Thorpe, it appeared to him quite uncertain
when it was built, but no question exists of its
antiquity. S. Margaret's Chapel is mentioned in
CHAPEL OK S. MARGARET, HEI.I.E, DARENTH.
the Textus Roffenses as subject to the payment
for Chrism of the yearly sum of sixpence to
Rochester Cathedral.
A composition was confirmed by Archbishop
Wareham, in 1522, relative to the duty to be
performed at the chapel, respecting which a
difference had then arisen between the vicar of
62 BYGONE KENT.
the parish and the parishioners ; upon which
occasion it was ordered by the Archbishop (inter
alia) that owing to the distance, the privileges of
baptism and burial were to be obtained at the
chapel, but marriage was restricted to the parish
church. It is singular that both the parish
church and this chapel were dedicated to S.
Margaret.
In reference to the mention of Chrism, it should
be added that it appears to have been customary
for parish Churches in the Diocese of Rochester
to pay a Chrism Due of ixrt^., as distinguished
from the Chapels which paid only v\d, yearly.
By an Episcopal ordination of the Vicarage, of
the 4th December 1292, the vicar was to find
"duos capellanos celebrantes, unum videlicit in
ecclesia de Darenth, et alterum in Capella de
Helles."
Nothing of the Chapel remained even in
Thorpe's time, but the Tower ; the walls of the
main structure having been then many years since
removed, and the materials converted to other
uses, which, he adds, "has been generally the fate
of these disused edifices." Of this Tower I have
reproduced the north-east view which he has
left us.
RUINED CHAPELS AND CHANTRIES. 63
The Chantry of S. Mary at Milton,
NEXT GrAVESEND.
This chantry was founded by Aymer de Valence,
Earl Pembroke, owner of the Manor of Milton, who
lies buried in a place of remarkable honour on
the north side of the Choir of Westminster Abbey
a distinction which he probably owed to the
circumstance that his father was half-brother to
King Henry III.
Bishop Hamo de Hethe, by an instrument
dated April 15th, 1322, at his palace at Hailing,
ordained at the instance of the Earl Aymer (who
was patron of the Chantry) and of the secular priests
residing at it, among other things "that they should
be for the future ' Regulars ' who should receive
and keep a certain rule, and who, in
celebrating divine offices for the souls of the
family of Montchensie, and of the Earl himself,
his wife, etc., should especially commemorate him
and the founder. And that of the priests who
should be the first placed in this Chantry should
be appointed by him, the said Bishop, one of
whom adjudged most fit by him for this purpose
should be appointed Provost or Master, whom the
rest should obey as their superior, and on his
death or removal the brethren, within three
64 B YGONE KENT.
months after the vacancy, were to choose for a
successor another priest who had professed the
rule of the Chantry for one year, and after being
presented to the patron, or if he was at an incon-
venient distance, to the steward or baiHff of his
estate, he was to be admitted as Provost by the
Bishop of Rochester."
And the Bishop also granted that they should
" have an altar in the Chapel of the Chantry, and
a competent burial place for themselves, but for no
others whatsoever, and that no one but themselves
should administer the sacraments of the Church
therein (and that with bells, in a becoming
manner) and without prejudice to the Mother
Church, and he willed they should possess the
same for ever, freely, peaceably, and quietly, saving
all episcopal right to him and to the Church of
Rochester."
In the list of the benefices of the Bishop of the
Diocese {^Reg. Roff. 14) the Rectory and this
chantry are enumerated together as " Ecclesia de
Meltone cum Cantaria ibidem." There was no
chantry within the Church, but this chantry of S.
Mary was within a few hundred yards distance of
it, to the north-west.
No exterior indications of the chantry are now
RUINED CHAPELS AND CHANTRIES. 65
visible, but the walls are enclosed in the Barracks
of New Tavern Fort. The foundation was
suppressed and alienated in the latter part of the
reign of King Henry VIII.
The Free Chapel of S. Lawrence, Halling.
This " Libera Capella Sancti Laurentij in
Hallyng," is another of the suppressed chantries
under the operation of the Edwardian statute.
It appears to have been an edifice of fair
antiquity, being built with rough stones, and was,
Thorpe says, from his earliest memory in a ruined
condition, without roof or timbers, but had then
for some years past been converted into a
workshop and dwellinghouse, and inhabited by a
wheelwright, the chancel portion being the
house. It was at that time plastered over and
whitewashed. The chapel is mentioned in the
Reg. Roff. as being in the collation of the bishop.
At a distance of a mile is the parish church,
and near to it the remains of the ancient
Episcopal Palace ; close to, and connected with
which, was another chapel for the Bishop's use.
Dode Chapel,
in the parish of Luddesdown, was originally, I
believe, the parish church of a separate parish of
66 BYGONE KENT.
its own name, and as seems from the Textus
Roffensis, it was accordingly subject to the yearly-
Chrism of ninepence to the Bishop of Rochester.
The origin of its nonuser is now lost in the
obscurity and maze of years, but it was ultimately
annexed to the Rectory of Paddlesworth, by
instrument dated the ist March, 1366.
The view of the ruins given in Thorpe is not
correct, since there is no reality of any
erection by squared stones or ashlar work, as there
portrayed, but the structure is of flint chalk and
rag rubble work, with an exterior coat of plaster
much indurated and hardened by years of
exposure. The nave is about thirty-six feet in
length and the chancel eighteen feet, and now so
surrounded by a dense underwood and brushwood
as to be scarcely accessible.
Maplescomb.
This little building, like the one last mentioned,
was formerly the church of a rectory, down to a
comparatively late period, since it was only united
to the adjoining parish of Kingsdown in a.d. 1638,
or thereabouts.
Dr. Harris writes (as quoted i-n Thorpe's
Customale) " Will de Valorgnes tenet de D. R.
RUINED CHAPELS AND CHANTRIES. 67
in capite medietat in maneris de Maplescampe,"
by the service of "finding a halfpenny for an
offering whenever he should hear mass at
Maplescamp."
The length of the building was fifty-one feet by
a width of twenty-one feet, and the engraving
supplied shows how the ruins appeared in a.d.
1768.
RUINS OF MAPLESCOMB CHURCH, I768.
ROKESLEY, NOW RuXLEY.
This ruined building is said to stand near and
just above the XIII. milestone on the road from
London to Farningham.
It appears that Cardinal Pole united it upon
the occasion of his visitation, in 1557, to the parish
of North Cray.
The little church building, which in Thorpe's
time, was entire, then stood in the corner of a
68 BYGONE KENT.
garden, and had been converted into a barn.
The southern (priest's) entrance had been
enlarged, and fitted with a pair of barn doors,
allowing a width of space for a waggon to draw
through.
It was then called " Church Barn," in order to
distinguish it from other barns upon the same
farm.
In the chancel portion he mentions that there
then remained "two confessionary stalls, with
mitred arches and seats in them, and nearer to the
east end on the same side the receptacle for the
holy water," by which it is clear that he meant the
usual Sedilia and Piscina.
LULLINGSTONE.
These ruins are alleged to have anciently
formed the church of a distinct parish, though,
according to the Textus Roffensis, doubt is cast
on the claim, since it is shown to have paid to the
mother church of the Diocese only the chapelry
Chrism of sixpence yearly.
The fabric had a length of thirty-seven feet by
sixteen feet and a half, and was measured as well
as was possible, owing to the briars and nettles, by
Mr. Thorpe himself. He considered the circular
RUINED CHAPELS AND CHANTRIES. 69
windows indicated the presence of Roman work,
which, to say the least, is open to more than
doubt.
The Httle parish and vicarage of Lullingstone
was for ecclesiastical purposes merged in the
adjoining parish and rectory of Lullingstone as
late as a.d. 17 12.
S. Leonard, at West Malling.
The remains of this building are extremely well
known, and like S. Mary Helle, consist of a
Tower only, of massive erection. The chapel
appears, from the records collected in the Textus
Roffensis, to have been one belonging to Malling,
and was seventy feet in length by thirty-three
feet in breadth. Thorpe's view of the tower,
taken in 1772, gives an inadequate impression of
the massiveness of the work, the walls being seven
feet in thickness and some seventy feet even in the
then reduced state of its height. Thorpe remarks
that " the destruction of the body of the chapel was
without doubt for the materials, and that the
upper part of the tower has shared the same fate,
as would the whole most likely but for the labour
and expense owing to the hardness and strong
concretion of the cement. "
70 BYGONE KENT.
Chapel of S. John, at Newphthe,
East Malling.
The following account is taken almost totidem
verbis from the Czistomale Roffense.
Newhithe, commonly called Newhede, from its
situation on the banks of the Medway (the
termination of the Saxon word hithe signifying a
small port or haven for embarking, and landing,
loading, and unloading goods) is a hamlet in the
above parish.
In the street stands an ancient chapel, which
was dedicated to S. John, but was in Thorpe's
time already converted into a dwelling-house.
The structure seems to have been a free chapel
for the benefit of this hamlet, situate at a good
distance from the parish church : but the founder
and endowments are unknown. On the general
suppression, the lands annexed to them were
granted to different persons and uses.
In the augmentation of the Vicarage of East
Malling, in the time of Archbishop Islip, dated
at Charing in the year 1363, mention is made that
John Lorkyn, then vicar, and his successors, should
receive all oblations or offerings of what kind
soever given to the said chapel, " percipiet
insuper vicarius predictus et sui successores
RUINED CHAPELS AND CHANTRIES. 71
vicarii in dicta ecclesia ministrantes cunctis
temporibus in futurum omnes et omnimodas
oblaciones tarn in dicta ecclesia parochiali quam
in capella Sancti Johannis apud Newhitiie in
parochia dicte ecclesie constitute," etc. This
building, together with a small piece of ground on
the south side, which seemed to have been the
cemetery, became in course of years the property
CHAPEL OF S. JOHN, NEWHITHE, EAST MALLING.
of Sir Roger Twisden, Bart. The chapel then
stood in a small square at the back of the
houses, on the south side of the street, from
whence were two passages that led to it. The
east window had been taken out, and the space
worked up with stones, etc. The west window
also appeared a ruin, as in the drawing taken from
Mr. Thorpe's book, and the old door-case, which
72 BYGONE KENT.
from the stonework was a Gothic one, had been
taken away and a modern one put in its place.
The window on the north side was likewise a
Gothic one, belonging to the chapel, but being too
large for the dwelling-house, had been contracted,
and the upper mitred panels plastered over.
The length of the chapel is stated to be thirty-
one feet and the breadth twenty feet. The draw-
ing was taken a.d. 1777, and shews the north-west
view of the chapel.
Merston.
Of this little church there are no remains above
the ground level, and the living has become a
sinecure rectory. The church, when existent, was
dedicated to St. Giles, and it stood at the
north-east corner of a wood known as Chapel
Wood, about half a mile to the east of Green
Farm, now occupied by Mr. Jull, which wood has
since been grubbed, and the dismembered remains
of the walls are even now continually dispersed
by the ploughshare. Merston, which adjoins
Shorne, was (judging from its name) probably a
place of more importance than is now apparent.
Taking Mere as equivalent to Sea, it would read
Water or Seatown, in relation to the sea water
RUINED CHAPELS AND CHANTRIES. 73
which here finds entrance from the Thames
Mouth. The parish for all practical purposes is
absorbed in Shorne.
Paddlesworth.
These ruins again, as in several earlier cases,
are those not so much of a chapel as of a
parish church, if we depend upon the Textus
Roffensis.
The walls in Thorpe's time were entire
excepting a breach on the north side, made wide
enough for farm carts to enter for shelter from the
weather, and for the reception of ploughs, harrows,
and other implements of husbandry, which was
then, he adds, " the only use that was made of it."
Greenhithe, Swanscomb, St. Mary's Chapel.
This chantry, in the parish of Swanscomb, was
erected in the reign of Edward III., and dedicated
to Almighty God under the invocation of the
Blessed Virgin Mary, " in which the Divine
Offices should be daily offered for the health of
the King's soul and of John Lucas of Swannes-
compe " while they lived, and afterwards for
their souls, " cum ab hac luce substracti fuerimus,"
and for their ancestors, and for the souls of all the
74 BYGONE KENT.
faithful departed. The site was loo feet square,
and the endowment was 20 acres of pasture in
Swanscomb parish, of which, as above mentioned,
the village of Greenhithe formed part.
Pembury, The Chapel of St. Mary in the
Cemetery.
In this parish we have, for Kent, the very
unusual circumstance of the distinct and separate
building of the chantry within the limits of the
churchyard of the parish. It was known as "the
Chantry of St. Mary in the Cemetery," and was
founded by John Culpepper, in the reign of
Edward III. The structure was in length thirty feet,
and in width eighteen feet, and its roof was covered
with lead. It remained intact until the general
suppression of such chantries in the i Edward VI.,
when it was speedily pulled down, and its materials
converted into cash, while the lands forming its
endowment were sold to different persons.
Richard Hill was the last incumbent of the
chantry (a.d. 1553), and it appears that as such
he received a compensatory life pension of
£6 13s. 4d. upon being sent adrift.
No remains now exist, and no view of the
chantry appears to be extant.
RUINED CHAPELS AND CHANTRIES. 75
Reculver, St. James's Chantry.
Leland is quoted as writing " that there was a
neglect chapel owt of the churchyard," etc. This
chapel, it seems, stood at a small distance west of
the renowned Parish Church, and was dedicated to
St. James, and a Hermit was appointed to
officiate in it. King Richard II., in the third year
of his reign, granted to Thomas Hamond, the
then Hermit of this chapel, the right of collecting
alms for its rebuilding, It was then stated that
the old chapel had been instituted for the burial
of persons whose bodies were found upon the sea
shore, a fate which unhappily overtook this
ancient, though rebuilt, structure, which perished
by the like encroachments of the insatiable sea.
Strood, St. Bartholomew's.
The well-known Lazar House at the east end of
Rochester, known as St. Bartholomew's, Chatham,
was not an isolated establishment of that character
in the locality, for in the opposite (the west)
extremity of the City of Rochester stood a
similar institution.
This second St. Bartholomew's was at the top
of Strood Hill, at a spot called "The White Ditch,"
on the south side of the present highway there.
76 BYGONE KENT.
and doubtless the appellation of White arose from
the natural appearance of the chalk sub-soil upon
excavation. The hill long retained, and perhaps
still retains to this day, the name of " Spittal Hill."
We find in the will of Thomas de Woldham,
Bishop of Rochester, amidst other bequests was
the following, " Item, lego leprosis de Alba fossa
v\s. vvixdy The personnel of this hospital
apparently comprised a Sisterhood as well as
Brethren, and probably therefore received patients
of both sexes. In the same way at Pilton,
Devon, we find " Adam Teighe, under date the
24 Edward III., a.d. 1350, gave a tenement in that
place to the Brothers and Sisters of the Leper
Hospital of the Blessed Margaret of Pilton."
We can unfortunately now procure no view of
any part of this suppressed foundation. Referring
to St. Bartholomew's, at Chatham, I should add
that to the west of the Norman Church the nave
extended sixteen feet, but in this and in the last
century the nave has been much more extended
in a westerly direction.
It is noteworthy that at the western entrance of
the City of Canterbury (upon the same high road
from London) existed the similar hospital for
lepers of St. Nicholas, one mile from the west gate
RUINED CHAPELS AND CHANTRIES. 77
of the city, the same distance of the Strood Lazar
House from the western entrance into Rochester,
It was founded by Archbishop Lanfranc, circa
1084, with two other houses, which were dedicated
respectively to St. James and St. Lawrence.
Both of the latter foundations were swept away at
the time of suppression, in 1537 and 1551, but
the retention of the ancient church of St. Nicholas
for congregational worship saved the Harbledown
Lazar House, as St. Bartholomew's Chapel at
Chatham saved the hospital attached to it.
Although the church or chapel at '* Whiteditch,"
Spittal Hill, Strood, was dedicated to St.
Bartholomew, it would appear that the Lazar
House itself (from Sto well's Records of Wills) was
called after St. Katherine.
Edward Munn, of Strood, bequeathed *' to the
poor folke of the Spittlehouse a bushel of malt,"
and another testator left "to the Lazar House of
Whiteditch, 2s."
Ash, near Ridley, Chapel of Scots Grove,
in this parish.
The dedication of this chapel, like that of St.
Katharine in Shorne, is not mentioned in Hasted's
** Kent/' or any other book to my knowledge.
78 BYGONE KENT.
It was probably a chapel attached to Scot
Grove, since the latter was anciently accounted as
a manor. Hasted speaking of it says, " there was
once a chapel belonging to this estate, the
foundations of which are still visible in a wood
called Chapel Wood," and Thorpe says that in
August, 1769, its foundations were visible, and
that he had seen them.
Fawkham.
Mention is made in the Textus Roffensis, p. 136,
of a chantry of St. Catherine in the parish church,
but Sir W. de Faukham, in 1274, founded another
within the parish church in honour of the Blessed
Virgin Mary, and for the good of the souls of
himself and of his successors, which he endowed
with five marks of yearly rent in pure and
perpetual alms, to be paid out of fifty-five acres at
Scotbury, in Southfieet, and this foundation was
confirmed by the bishop in a.d. 1278. St
Catherine's seems to have been a chantry under
the jurisdiction of the Archdeacon of Rochester,
since it is so recorded at p. 136 Reg. Roff., by the
name of " Cantaria Stse Katarinae de Fawkham."
The view given by Thorpe in his Customale , p.
116, was taken by his express instructions, in the
RUINED CHAPELS AND CHANTRIES. 79
year 1769, and it shews clearly the outline of this
ancient chantry, though his reference to it is curt.
"There was another chantry dedicated to St.
Catherine, but by whom founded is uncertain,"
and he seems to regard the ruined building as
possibly other than St. Catherine, but Hasted,
writing later, says, " the foundations of the ancient
Mansion House of Fawkham are yet visible. . . .
What remains of the building seem to have been
the walls of the chapel."
CosENTON Chapel, Aylesford Parish.
Sir Stephen de Cosenton, Knight, was with
King Edward I. at the noted siege of Carlaverock,
in Scotland, and was there made a Banneret by
the King for his good service.
At this period it would seem there was a chapel
at Cosenton Manor dedicated to St. Michael, with
a Chantry in it founded by Sir Stephen.
It further appears that in 1444, September 12,
{23 Henry VI.) he released by deed the Master and
Brethren of the Hospital of the Newerk at
Strood from the obligation of finding a Chaplain
to celebrate yearly in this Chapel of St. Michael,
and it would seem that they in return released all
privilege of providing such Chaplain, and all
8o BYGONE KENT.
claims connected with it, though this last and
complimentary release seems to have come
somewhat tardily, since it was not executed till
some eleven years later, and then at Strood on the
loth October, 34 Henry VI.
Thorpe, writing in 1788, says no vestige
remained to point out the exact site of the chapel.
TOTTINGTON ChAPEL, AyLESFORD.
In the same parish of Aylesford also stood the
Chapel of Tottington, the exact site of which
Thorpe had the good fortune to discover, and he
ascertained its dimensions to have been thirty-nine
feet in length by twenty-two feet six inches
in width. The structure stood east and west,
and was also, like the last-mentioned chapel,
dedicated to St. Michael.
After the suppression, it seems to have fallen
into disuse, and the natural forces of nature,
assisted by the acts of men, speedily completed
the ruin.
COBHAM, COBHAMBURY.
The chapel here was doubtless a free chapel,
but it must not be confused with the " Quandam
perpetuam Cantariam " which Pope Urban
the VI. authorised, " in parochiali ecclesia de
RUINED CHAPELS AND CHANTRIES. 8i
Cobeham," which the parents of John, Lord
Cobham, had chosen for their own interment, and
in which latter chantry five perpetual Chaplains,
forming a College, should serve "in Divinis " for
ever.
This latter foundation of the 36 Edward III.,
A.D. 1362 (so amply furnished and endowed by
the piety of John de Cobham), continued till the
reign of Henry VIII., when, foreseeing the
approaching dissolution, the Master and Brethren
aliened it to George Brooke, Lord Cobham, who
had interest with the King, to protect the
transaction, and so it happened the property in the
suppressed chantry when thus sold to him was by
express words exempted from the destructive opera-
tion of the statute of the 31st year of that king, and
again from the statute for the suppression of
Chantries, i Edward VI., c. 14. In the course of
making some recent searches in connection with the
St. Katherine's Chantry, Shorne, I ascertained the
existence at Hatfield House, Herts, of two Rolls
of the accounts of the Masters of this College,
temp. Henry VII.
Sir William Brooke, the son of George Brooke
de Cobham, by his will left the property to
trustees, under which instrument, and by the aid
G
82 BYGONE KENT.
of an Act of Parliament of the 39 Elizabeth, an
entirely new foundation was created and the
Wardens of Rochester Bridge brought into
connection with it, and this latter foundation in its
general outlines has continued with better fortune
than its predecessor till this day.
Returning to the free Chapel of Cobhambury,
there is, I believe, no trace of the building now
remaining, but in the list of Collations of
Benefices appertaining to the Bishop stands
recorded the "libera capella de Cobhambury."
Dartford, St. Edmund the Martyr.
This is another chantry the building of which
disappeared, according to Hasted, at the general
suppression. It was situate on " East Hill," and
overlooked the parish church and churchyard,
both of which lay in the town below, but although
the building itself was destroyed and its materials
sold, the ground around it was continued as a
burial ground, and so remains to this day. The
advowson of this chantry was vested in the
Priory of Dartford Convent, in the 46th year of
Edward V., indeed it was given to the Nuns
at the period of their first endowment. The
other chantry at Dartford was within the parish
RUINED CHAPELS AND CHANTRIES. 83
church, and was founded by a former Vicar,
Thomas de Dartford, alias A. H. Stampett, in
A.D. 1338.
It was well endowed, and at tts suppression in
1553, Robert Bacon was its incumbent, and was
pensioned off at £6 per annum.
It was dedicated to the Blessed Virgin, and
paid the Vicar xii</. yearly, and was usually called
" the Stampett Chantry."
In the list of the Bishop's benefices (Reg.Roff.
141) it appears that the separate " Cantaria Sti
Edmundi de Dertford" was under the jurisdiction
of the Archdeacon, while the " Vicaria de
Dertford et Cantaria ibidem de Stampetts " were
not.
No remains of St. Edmund's Chantry are
extant.
HORSEMONDEN.
The " Cantaria annunciationis Beatse Mariae
in Horsemonden," to follow the words of the old
record, is the last of the three chantries dependent
on the jurisdiction of the Archdeacon, and though
it does not fairly come within the scope of this
paper, as not being contained in an independent
edifice (since, as was most frequent and far more
convenient, a chantry was located within the
84 BYGONE KENT.
parish church), it is yet interesting as a rare
instance of an elective advowson in Kent. Thus
the founder, Robert de Grovehurst, by deed of the
4th July, 1338, provided that on the first vacancy
the parishioners who should "be present at the
usual time of mass on the next Sunday, being six
in number, should nominate a priest to be
presented to the chantry," to which there was
apparently a house of residence assigned, with
the obligation of celebrating daily.
Maidstone Chapel of Corpus Christi,
in Earl Street, with its adjacent building, was a
work of much importance.
The revenues of the fraternity were ample, and
not only did their chaplain act as chantry priest
in their own chapel, but they also maintained out
of their revenues a priest to celebrate in the
parish church of All Saints'. On the suppression,
the Corporation, by the sale of the community vest-
ments, church plate, etc., were enabled to purchase
this property of the Crown, and it is now the
receptacle of the tubs and casks of a brewery,
against which misappropriation its massive walls
and beautiful traceried windows offer a silent but
ineffective protest.
RUINED CHAPELS AND CHANTRIES. 85
Dover Round Church.
The dedication of this Httle Round Church on
the heights at Dover, is, I beheve, unknown. It
has been well described in the Archceologia
Cantiana, with a plan shewing the circular nave of
an interior diameter of twenty-five feet, and a
chancel possessing a length of twenty-seven feet
by a width of about fourteen feet. The
foundations are now cleared, and rise to a level
with the surrounding land. These remains
will always command a large interest, as being
the reputed place of conference between King
John and the Pope's Legate, Pandulf.
a SJ^ctcb of tbc 1bi5tor^ of tbe Cburcb
or Basilica of Xprningc.
By the Rev. Canon R. C. Jenkins, m.a.
THE Church of Lyminge, dedicated originally
to " St Marv the Mother of God," * and on
its refoundation by St. Dunstan having the double
title of S. Mary and S. Ethelburga (or Eadburgt)
its first foundress, possesses a historical interest
which very few of the Saxon foundations can
equal, and none certainly surpass. Bound up
inseparably with the life and history of the saintly
Queen, the only daughter of Ethelbert and
Bertha, and the widow of the martyred King
Edwin of Northumberland, the earliest lines of its
history are traced in those of her own, and from
the mention of the place in the early charters as a
royal possession, and her subsequent choice of it
as the scene of her conventual life, we may
reasonably conjecture that it was from Lyminge
* Charter of King Wihtraed, a.d. 696.
tOoscelinus writes, "In the Church of Lyminge which belongs to the
Archbishop, the Queen Ethelburga is known to be buried, but there she is
called Eadburg" (a.d. 1097). Ethelbald and Ethelward are in like
manner contracted into Eadbald and Eadward.
THE CHURCH OF L YMINGE. 87
that she took her eventful journey to York as the
betrothed of the unfortunate Edwin. Accom-
panied by S. PauHnus, and with his aid, she
brought about the conversion of her husband and
his subjects, whose romantic narrative is given us
so fully by Bede. The fatal battle of Heathfield,
in which the King fell, and his army was almost
destroyed, broke up the great work of conversion,
whose success had been so sudden and brilliant.
The widowed queen, with her only daughter and
the two sons of her husband by his former
marriage, took refuge in flight, and reaching Kent
in safety with her faithful chaplain, Paulinus, asked
of her brother Eadbald the gift of the ancient
park and villa of Lyminge, a Roman foundation of
importance, out of whose materials she built
her monastery and nunnery — a double foundation
according to the Benedictine usage of that early
day — and received the veil from Archbishop
Honorius in the latter end of the year 633.
Lyminge became thus the second monastery and
(with Folkestone) the first nunnery founded by
the Saxons in England, and as Montalembert, in
his "Moines d' Occident," observes, "forms the
link of connection between the two great centres
of Catholic life in England," Canterbury and York.
88 B YGONE KENT.
But she founded her nunnery not for herself
alone, but for her niece Mildretha or Miltrude,
who succeeded her as Abbess in 647. But who,
it may be asked, was this Mildred ? Certainly not
the far greater saint of Thanet, who lived a
generation after. And how in any case could she
have been the niece of Ethelburga, whose only
recognised niece was the only daughter of her
only brother King Eadbald ? The only means of
reconciling the statements of the chroniclers with
the pedigree of the Kentish kings is the
assignment of her origin to that unlawful marriage
of Eadbald with his step-mother, which caused so
grave a scandal in the early church of Kent, and
which led to the suppression of the names of both
mother and daughter in the genealogies. The
fact that this Mildred was buried in the same
grave with Ethelburga, and the confusion
occasioned by the attempt to identify her with her
later namesake, led to that controversy between
the inheritors of their respective relics, the monks
of S. Augustine and the Canons of S. Gregory in
Canterbury, which continued smouldering until
the rival foundations and the bones of contention
were mingled together in the ruin of the
dissolution. The Danish invasions had in the
THE CHURCH OF L YMINGE. 89
ninth century rendered the isolated position of the
nuns one of continual danger, and in the opening
of that century the nunnery was removed to
Canterbury, Coenulf and Cuthred having granted
by a charter to " the Abbess Selethrytha and her
family at the church of S. Mary ever- Virgin,
which is situate in the place called Limming,
where rests the body of S. Eadburg {ubi pausat
corpus B. Eadburgae), a portion of land in the
city of Canterbury, ad necessitatis refugium.''
The incursions of the Danes soon rendered the
position of the Monastery no less untenable, and
gave S. Dunstan an opportunity of carrying out
his great plan of suppressing the double
foundations. He accordingly removed the monks
to Canterbury in the year 965, and restored the
church, having obtained a charter in 960,
addressed no longer to the monastery or " family "
of Lyminge, but to the church itself. '* When
the manor and church came thus into the hands
of the Archbishops, they are said by the ancient
chroniclers to have restored it 'in a certain
fashion,' utcumque restauraverunty And the
extraordinary rudeness of their work, a kind of
wild imitation of the almost Roman work of the
original church, and out of the materials of it, is
90 BYGONE KENT.
the most conspicuous feature of the chancel and
south wall of the nave, which are the undoubted
work of Dunstan. In these we find irregular
herring-bone work, with bonding courses of
Roman bricks and flat stones, with occasional
courses of large blocks of stone, and the widest
jointed masonry (if it could be called such) that
can possibly be found. The character of these
walls is unique, and indicates the extraordinary
rudeness of the Saxon work of the Transition
period, which it represents. A portion of the
south wall of the nave is built upon a fragment of
the north wall of Ethelburga's Church, and
exhibits a masonry of the closest kind, almost
resembling a mosaic-work. This formed part of
the outer wall of the original church, enclosing the
remarkable apsidal remain which contains the
burial-place of the Queen, which is now clearly
disclosed, a fragment of the outward plastering
being even now visible. This interesting remain
was discovered in 1859, and is an object of the
greatest interest to the many visitors of the
church.
In 1085, Lanfranc, in order to endow his new
foundation of S. Gregory at Canterbury with
relics of sufficient importance, bestowed upon it
THE CHURCH OF LYMINGE. 91
those of Ethelburga which were disinterred by
the priest of the place, Radulfus, and received
with great pomp by the Gregorian Canons.
With the body of the queen there was found also
the body of her niece, and upon this began the
great conflict between the religious of the rival
foundations. A remarkable unpublished treatise
of the Augustinian monk Goscelinus (a.d. 1097)
gives us the early history of the controversy, and
describes the translation of the relics. The
destruction of the burial place is still distinctly
traceable in the different masonry and mortar
used for restoring the wall, against, and indeed
under which, it was constructed. Lanfranc, who is
said to have imported square stones from Caen
for building his manor-houses, raised upon the
ancient foundations of the monastic buildings a
palace which both he and the successive archbishops
occupied in succession with their other numerous
manor-houses in Kent and Sussex. In 1279,
Archbishop Peckham held a grand court at the
Aula or Camera de Lyminge, and received there
the homage of Gilbert de Clare, Earl of
Gloucester, who came with a great retinue to take
the oath of feudal obedience to the archbishop.
Archbishop Winchelsey and his successors up to
92 BYGONE KENT.
the time of Courtenay occasionally resided here ;
but the last, finding himself overhoused, and seeing
the necessity of having a residence rather of the
military than the civil type, obtained permission
from the king and the priory to pull down some
of his manor-houses in order to build the Castle
of Saltwood, the stones being chiefly reserved for
the nearest churches or chapels. It is to this
reservation that we are indebted for the present
massive tower, whose stones become larger as
they approach the top, indicating the fact that the
builders had come to the larger blocks of the
foundation when they arrived at the upper portion
of the work. The arms of Cardinal Morton and
Archbishop Warham on the sides of the western
door lead to the conclusion that the work extended
from about i486 to 1527, in which latter year the
last benefaction towards it is mentioned. The
body of the church underwent a considerable
change at a somewhat earlier date. An ancient
north chapel (probably added by William Preene,
the rector in 1404) appears to have been utilised
for the completion of a north aisle, which is
separated from the nave by an arcade of great
lightness and beauty, a very fine specimen of
Tudor work. This improvement was most
THE CHURCH OF L YMINGE. 93
probably effected by Cardinal Bourchier, whose
arms in stained glass were originally in the east
window of the aisle, and are now to be seen in the
early window over the porch. In the south wall
of the nave is a very curious recess, formed of
Roman bricks, which appears to indicate the place
of an altar. The chancel arch, of the most
massive structure and extending to the walls on
either side, appears, as well as the remarkable
flying buttress at the south-east angle of the
chancel, to have been one of the repairs effected
by Archbishop Peckham, in 1279-80. He found
that his predecessor. Archbishop Boniface, had
left the churches and manor-houses of the
see in such a state of disrepair as to need the
disbursement of large sums for their restoration.
These arches belong to that century, and may
therefore be reasonably assigned to his work.
The east window of the chancel, inserted in
close-jointed masonry, which is singularly
contrasted with the wide joints of the earlier work,
was probably among the repairs enjoined by
Archbishop Warham on his visitation in 151 1.
The ruin of the manor-house and the adjacent
buildings had begun in the days of Archbishop
Arundel, and is described in the inventory of his
94 BYGONE KENT.
property taken by a commission held at Lyminge,
on the occasion of his brief attainder. The
stained glass window of the chancel, the work
of the late Mr. Gibbs, of Bedford Square,
representing the Nativity, the adoration of the
shepherds and of the Magi, is designed in its
lower tier to illustrate the humiliation of Christ,
the upper portion exhibiting the Saviour
enthroned in glory, surrounded by the Apostles,
while the crown of the arches contains the
symbols of the Evangelists.
The manor, which originally was one of the
largest in Kent, extending over Romney Marsh,
and to the borders of Sussex on the south, and in
the west covering several parishes in the weald,
was surrendered by Cranmer to the crown,
together with the advowson of the rectory and
vicarage of Lyminge, with the ancient chapelries
of Stanford (afterwards including Westenhanger)
and Paddlesworth, The last still forms a part of
the rectory of Lyminge, though it constitutes a
separate parish. The entire estate was granted
by King Henry VI IL to Sir Anthony Aucher,
the Master of the Jewels, who was killed in the
siege of Calais under Queen Mary. It passed to
his elder son, whose only daughter was married
THE CHURCH OF LYMINGE. 95
to Sir Humphrey Gilbert, the half-brother of Sir
Walter Raleigh, then to the second branch of the
Auchers (of Bourne Place, in Bishopsbourne),
and from them through the Roberts and
Taylor families to the Lord Chancellor (Lord
Loughborough), from whom it was purchased by
the family of Price.
It is now held by the trustees of the late Mr.
Kelcey. The advowsons which were granted
separately, by a deed now preserved in the
British Museum, and signed by Cranmer himself,
passed through the same successive ownerships,
but were separated from the manor in 1853. The
living is a rectory and a vicarage, and had until
recent times a double succession, the rectory
having been bestowed as a sinecure on many
persons of great eminence in the church. Among
these may be mentioned Adam de Murimuth, the
historian, Cardinal Gaucelinus de Ossa, the
nephew of Pope John the XXII., William de
Cusaneia, keeper of the king's wardrobe,
Audomarus de Rupy, Archdeacon of Canter-
bury, Philip Morgan, Bishop of Worcester, and
others.
The ancient charters relating to the
monastery and church, most of them originals.
96 BYGONE KENT.
and fourteen in number, are to be found
in the Harleian and Cotton collections in the
British Museum, and in the Library of
Canterbury Cathedral. They are published in
the Saxon Chartulary of Kemble, and extend
from 689 to 960.
Canterbury pilgrims anb their Sojourn
in the Cit^.
By the Rev. W. J. Foxei.l, b.a.
THERE is no place within the whole length
and breadth of England which surpasses in
interest and charm the ancient city of Canterbury.
All through the summer months, day after day,
fresh crowds of visitors — veritable Canterbury
pilgrims — flock to catch a glimpse of its quaint
old houses, the massive relics of the walls which
once girt it round, and above all its venerable
cathedral.
" He that Seville hath not seen
Is no traveller I ween,"
runs the well known jingle, but our patriotism
may well be excused if we substitute Canterbury
for Seville. To have seen Canterbury, to have
trodden its streets, to have studied its memorials,
to have unearthed the history which lies embedded
within it, to have listened to the story which its
magnificent church has to tell — where " the stone
cries out of the wall and the beam out of the
H
98 B YGONE KENT.
timber answers it " — this is, in sober truth,
a " Hberal education."
The poetic attractiveness of old Canterbury-
extends to regions far beyond our own country.
Across the Atlantic, from the shores of that new
world whose history is but of yesterday, our
American cousins come in search of the ancient
and the picturesque. We know those enterprising
travellers go everywhere : they must '* do "
everything. But no place charms them more
than the sleepy old city that lies in the hollow of
the Stour valley, between the hills of S. Thomas
on the west and S. Martin on the east. And
hither, too, flock all manner of tourists — the 'Arry
from Margate, the business man from town,
artists and amateur photographers galore, clerics
of every degree and every shade of theological
opinion, Royalty itself.
History, it is said, repeats itself; and the
nineteenth century tourist is, for the most part,
but a new edition of the mediaeval pilgrim, who
hurried to the tomb of the famous martyr, devout
in the veneration of relics, or anxious in the
search for health. In these days the point of
interest is mainly aesthetic and antiquarian ; but
in those old times the motive of the pilgrimage
CANTERB UR V PIL GRIMS. 99
was chiefly a religious one. Either the pilgrimage
was undertaken as a penitential exercise or as a
pious duty ; or, as in very many cases, the pilgrim
was suffering from some obstinate complaint and
came to worship at S. Thomas's shrine, in the
confident expectation that the saint would work a
miracle and restore him to health, as he had
restored so many.
Every schoolboy knows that Thomas a Becket
was murdered in Canterbury Cathedral in 11 70.
Before that momentous event took place there
was hardly anything to mark off Canterbury
Cathedral from any other of the great Benedictine
churches of Norman foundation. It is true that
the great church of Canterbury could trace its
history back to St. Augustine, and to times even
prior to him. From the first, its ecclesiastical
jurisdiction, its privileges, its authority had been
considerable, Lanfranc and Anselm had shed a
glory over the chair of S. Augustine — names that
could never pass into oblivion. But still, all these
were circumstances intangible in themselves, and
incapable from their very nature of awaking any
great popular enthusiasm. The martyrdom of
" S. Thomas of Canterbury " changed all this.
The dispute between Henry II. and the proud
I oo BYG ONE KENT.
prelate who had been so strenuous for his rights
and privileges, had culminated in the tragic deed
of that December evening, when the four knights
brutally murdered the Archbishop within the
sacred walls of the cathedral itself. Visitors to the
cathedral are shown the actual spot in the
" Martyrdom " — the name ever since given to the
north transept of the nave, the scene of the
murder — where Becket fell. They descend the
steps by which the Crypt is entered, passing
beneath the very arch under which, the day after
the murder, the dead body of the archbishop was
carried from before the high altar, where it had
rested for one night, to its burial place at the east
end of the Crypt. In less than three years
Becket had become a saint, duly canonised by
Pope Alexander III. ; and four years after the
murder, the king himself in the humble dress
of a poor pilgrim knelt at this tomb in the
Crypt, and then and there submitted to do
penance by scourging at the hands of the
assembled monks and bishops.
And now the fame of the miracles which were
beginning to be wrought at the tomb, gradually
spread far and wide. What those miracles were
we are not left simply to ourselves to imagine.
CANTERB UR Y PILGRIMS. loi
Accounts of them have come down to us, and
pictorial memorials of some are still preserved
in the three remarkable stained-glass windows
situated in the north wall of the Trinity Chapel —
where stood the shrine after the " Translation " —
which have survived the brutal energy of Henry
VIII. and the fanatical zeal of the Roundheads.
The old monkish chronicler rejoiced to describe
the Becket miracles, quoting the language of the
Gospels : —
" The blind see, the lame walk, the lepers are
cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, the
dumb speak, the poor have the gospel preached
to them, — the paralytic, the dropsical, the lunatic,
the epileptic, the fever-patient, — all are cured."
Passinof wonderful are some of these miracles.
Here, for instance, on one window is depicted the
story of the boy who, playing by the banks of the
Medway, fell into the stream and was drowned,
and who, after having been three hours in the
water, was dragged out, and restored to life with
a few drops of the martyr's blood. It was the
fame of such wonders which drew an ever-
increasing tide of pilgrims to the shrine.
At first — for the fifty years between 1 1 70 and
1220 — the body of the saint reposed in the tomb
I02 BYGONE KENT.
in the Crypt — that tomb which was the scene of
so many miracles, and which is represented so
often in the three windows mentioned above. At
length, the seventh of July 1220 witnessed the
grand ceremony of the "translation" of the
precious bones to the gorgeous shrine destined to
receive the holy relics in the Trinity Chapel
above. Magnificent was the celebration of this
great function. During the space of the two
years before it took place, proclamation had been
made throughout Christendom of the forthcoming
festival, and preparation was made for the
reception of those who would be drawn to it from
all parts. The young king Henry III., the aged
Cardinal Archbishop, Stephen Langton, he who
had wrung from John the great Charter of
English liberty, Hubert de Burgh, the Arch-
bishop of Rheims, Primate of France, Pandulf,
the papal legate, were the most distinguished of
those who took part in that day's glorious ceremony.
Thus to the original Festival of the Martyrdom,
December 29th, was added the Festival of the
Translation, July 7th, destined to be more popular
still, as occurring in summer time, when, of
course, travelling would be better, and pilgrimages
could be undertaken with less peril and greater
CANTERB UR V PIL GRIMS. 1 03
ease. Thus, too, a fresh impetus was given to
that swelling tide which flowed from all parts of
England and of Europe — of those who came
" The holy blissful martyr for to seek,
That them hath holpen when that they were sick."
From all parts of England, from Normandy, from
Brittany, from France came pious pilgrims. But
best known to us are those that travelled alongf
the London Road. It is this road to the shrine
which is the scene of Chaucer's great poem,
" The Canterbury Tales." Foreigners would
wend their way along the Sandwich Road, having
landed at that port ; other pilgrims, from the west
of England, as well as from abroad, would have
landed at Southampton, and followed the rough
track which led from thence to Canterbury. But
it is Chaucer's pilgrims, it is that company of " all
sorts and conditions of men " which assembled on
that April day at the Old Tabard Inn at South-
wark, and which he has immortalised — " the
knight, the yeoman, the prioress, with her
attendant nuns and three priests, the monk, the
friar, the merchant, the Oxford Scholar, the
lawyer, the squire, the five tradesmen, the cook,
the shipman, the physician, the great clothier of
Bath, the parish priest, the miller, the reeve, the
I04 BYGONE KENT.
manciple, the apparitor of the law courts, the
seller of indulgences, and the poet himself: " it is
these over whom our imagination loves to linger.
How we wish that the poet had told us more of that
old world which has passed away never to return :
that he had let us see more of that life so utterly
different from this hurry-scurry of existence which
we call life to-day. We can gain but a few
tantalising glimpses here and there.
The action of the poem occupies one day ; in
other words, the pilgrims take a whole day to go
from London to Canterbury. But long as this
time may seem to us, in these days of the *' Boat
Express," which, running between London and
Dover, reaches Canterbury in less than ninety
minutes — yet even so the poet is romancing. As
a rule, in Chaucer's time it took three or four
days to accomplish the journey ; but practical
conditions of time and space do not trammel the
poet. The motley company start from London
at dawn. Deptford and Greenwich are reached
in an hour or two : by noon Rochester " standeth
here fast by " — and so the journey is continued
through " Sidenbourne " and " Boughton under
Blee." The road now becomes a succession of
hilly steeps and sudden dips. The pilgrims are
CA NTERB UR V PILGRIMS. 1 05
nearing the famous city, and all eyes are strained
to catch from the top of one of these hills the first
sight of the great Tower of the Cathedral — the
predecessor of the present one — surmounted as it
then was with a gilded angel. And then just before
they reached the last hill of all, which slopes down
into Canterbury, they passed through Harbledown,
the
" Little town,
Which that ycleped is bob-up-and-down,
Under the Blee in Canterbury way."
The tedium of the journey had hitherto been
alleviated with "music, song, and merry tales:"
but now — as they came nearer holy ground, they
engaged in more fitting exercises — prayers and
telling of beads and serious converse. At
Harbledown they would pass the old leper
hospital of S. Nicholas, founded about 1084 by
Lanfranc. An old alms-box is still preserved
here, such as was hung out at the end of a long
pole to receive from pilgrims and travellers
whatever charity might prompt them to give. It
may well be that this is the very box into which
the cultured Erasmus let fall a coin when he was
on his way back from Canterbury to London,
after that visit which with Dean Colet he paid
io6 BYGONE KENT.
to the shrine, and of which he has left so
interesting and entertaining an account. Here also
is still shown a crystal, now set in a maple bowl,
but formerly adorning, it may be, the very shoe
of the martyred saint. The leather of the shoe
itself has long since disappeared, but we know it
was for centuries religiously preserved, and when
presented for Erasmus and his companion to kiss,
it still contained the crystal. Successive
generations of pilgrims must have stayed a few
moments here that they might venerate so sacred
a relic.
Just before the city itself is reached, the road
takes a sharp turn to the East. At the corner of
the road stands the ancient church of S. Dunstan,
also founded by Lanfranc. Here it was that one
celebrated pilgrim to Becket's tomb — already
mentioned — Henry H., — having first dismounted
at the hospital of S. Nicholas, changed his royal
robes for the plain tunic and cloak of the pilgrim,
and so walked barefoot to the scene of his
voluntary humiliation.
The band of pilgrims would enter by the West
Gate. At that time Canterbury was like the
Homeric Thebes — " seven-gated : " now, alas,
this west gate is the only one which has survived
CANTERBUR Y PILGRIMS.
107
the positive mania for destruction which seemed
to possess the worthy civic authorities of the last
century. The company would pass along the
High Street — each individual anxious to secure
lodgings for the night they were to spend in the
city. There was many a hospitable roof ready to
NORMAN STAIRCASE, CANTERBURY.
shelter them : first and foremost the great
monastery, of which the Cathedral formed part ;
then the Abbey of S. Augustine, so long its rival
in fame and power ; then the houses of the friars,
" Black," •' Grey," and " Austin ; " as well as the
various " hospitals " of S. Gregory, S. Lawrence,
io8 BYGONE KENT.
S. John, S. Margaret, and S. Thomas. This last,
founded about the beginning of the thirteenth
century expressly for the reception of poorer
pilgrims, cannot escape the notice of the observant
visitor of to-day, standing, as it does, by the
Eastbridge, on the south side of the High Street.
In addition to these, there were inns and
taverns and hostelries without number. But,
most famous of all, there was the inn standing at
the south-west corner of Mercery Lane—" The
Chequer of the Hope," with its " Dormitory of
the Hundred Beds." Here, according to the
anonymous poet, the author of the " Supplemen-
tary Tale," " the Continuator " of Chaucer — (for
it will be remembered that Chaucer does no more
than bring his pilgrims up to the city) — the twenty-
nine pilgrims of the "Tales" put up for the one
night during which they would remain in the city.
" When all this fresh fellowship were come to Canterbury
As ye have heard to fore, with tales glad and merry.
They took their Inn, and lodged them at midmorrow, I trow,
At Chequer of the Hope that many a man doth know ;
Their host of Southwark, that with them went, as ye have
heard to fore.
That was ruler of them all, of less and eke of more.
Ordained their dinner wisely ere they to church went,
Such victuals as he found in town, and for none other sent."
CANTERB UK Y PIL GRIMS. 1 09
The building itself still stands, preserving
something of its mediaeval appearance, but the
houses of which it now consists are no longer an
inn. Gone is the courtyard into which the
mounted pilgrims rode, with their horses' hoofs
clattering on the rough stones : gone too is the
ancient staircase, which stood on the outside of
the inn. We can imagine pilgrims arriving on
the eve of either of the two great festivals of S.
Thomas to find the whole city en fete : some
delighted with the novelty of everything, with
the bustle and the air of festivity, others anxiously
expecting the hour which was to bring solace to
the soul and blessing to the body — all intent on
paying their homage at the famous shrine.
What a red-letter day in their lives was that
when the pilgrims set foot within the walls of the
church itself! At the door a monk sprinkled
them with holy water : and once in the cathedral,
they passed on from one rare sight to another,
from one glory to another yet greater. To the
visitor of our time, the interior of Canterbury
Cathedral looks somewhat bare. The mediaeval
pilgrim, it may be fairly said, would hardly
recognise it now : he would miss the gay hangings
and tapestries, the many side-altars and chapels
no BYGONE KENT.
fitted up for worship, and so much, alas, of the
old stained-glass, the figures and the designs of
which set the pilgrims disputing in the manner so
amusingly narrated by the " Continuator."
*' He beareth a balstaff, quoth the toon, and else a raked end.
Thou failest, quoth the miller, thou hast not well thy mind,
It is a spear, if thou canst see, with a prick to fore
To push adown his enemy and through the shoulder bore.
Peace, quoth the host of Southwark, let stand the window
glazed.
Go up and do your offering, ye seemeth half amazed."
Eastward up the nave the pilgrims would
move, and so reach the north transept — the
" Martyrdom." The spot where S. Thomas was
killed would be pointed out to them ; and the
wooden .altar, set up to mark where the martyr
fell ; and the broken sword-blade belonging to
one of the four knights who had murdered him.
Thence they would go to the Crypt — to the spot
where stood the first tomb, where also a most
sacred relic awaited their veneration^part of the
marXyr's skull, set in silver. It was here, as
he tells us, that Erasmus saw the celebrated
hair-shirt, which the monks found on Becket's
body when they stripped it after the murder.
The choir was next visited, where still more
and more sacred relics were exhibited by an
CA NTERB UR V PIL GRIMS. 1 1 1
attendant monk, and devoutly kissed by the
pilgrims. To many a pilgrim, no doubt, would
be shown the costly vestments and ornaments
and vessels of the sanctuary, a list of which still
exists : chasubles, copes, tunics, dalmatics, and
albs, almost' without number ; crosses, chalices,
and patens ; mitres and pastoral staffs ; rings and
precious stones, and sacred books.
Onward and upward still they would go,
mounting the steps leading to the Trinity Chapel
oh their knees, till at length they stood before the
great shrine itself. The shrine consisted of two
parts, the stone pedestal with arches, and the
shrine proper ; the latter encased in a canopy of
wood, which could be raised at any moment by
pulling ropes suspended from the ceiling. Round
the lower part of the shrine, the sick and infirm
thronged and pressed. There was healing virtue
in the very stones on which the body of the
saint rested. We can but faintly imagine the
overpowering emotions of those who had travelled
many a weary mile, as at length they found
themselves laid at the foot of the martyr's shrine,
when health and happiness seemed to lie once
more within their grasp. The feelings so created,
when the very depths of the soul were stirred,
112 BYGONE KENT.
were sufficient, we cannot doubt, to work a
complete cure in some cases of nervous disorder.
Then, last of all, the canopy was raised, and the
gorgeous ark, the shrine, was displayed to view.
What a sight it was, glittering in gold and
precious stones ! Specially remarkable, rivetting
all eyes, w^as the wondrous ruby, which had been
given to the original tomb in the crypt by Louis
VII. of France when he came as a pilgrim. The
gem — so the legend ran — which had at first been
refused by the king, had leapt of its own accord
from the ring in which it was set, and fastened
itself to the tomb, "as if a goldsmith had fixed it
there." Can we wonder that religious piety in
that simple age was profoundly stimulated by
such marvellous tales ? The pilgrims, the old
rhymster tells us,
"Prayed to S. Thomas in such wise as they couth
And sith the holy relics each man with his mouth
Kissed as a goodly monk the names told and taught."
After the pilgrims had feasted their eyes on all
this wealth and splendour, while they were still
under the spell of so much that was grand and
mysterious and holy, they made their offerings,
and so went their way ; to give place to others
who were following close upon them — as
CANTERB UR Y PIL GRIMS. 1 1 3
they did on great occasions — In a continuous
stream.
But the pilgrimage was not completely finished
unless the pilgrim took away with him a
permanent memorial of his visit in the shape of
a little "ampulla," or leaden bottle, to be obtained
in the monastery, and containing water mixed
with a small portion — and in the course of
centuries it must have been the merest trace — of
the blood of S. Thomas. Leaving the monastery,
the pilgrims would pass along Mercery Lane to
the " Chequer of the Hope." Before the Civil War
in the seventeenth century, there was a colonnade
on each side of this lane, In front of the shops.
Under this colonnade (which no longer exists, as
the shopkeepers took advantage of the general
unsettlement during the Commonwealth to
encroach upon it, and to bring their shop fronts
forward so as to include It) they would make
their way, at every step encountering the eager
shopkeepers, pressing on them to buy all manner of
mementos, especially a caput Thomce, a leaden
brooch with the mitred head of the martyr
upon it. Dinner was awaiting them at the
Chequer: and after dinner the sights of the
city — especially its massive walls, would be
114 BYGONE KENT.
visited, or friends and old acquaintances would
be looked up.
Past for ever is the age of such things. It
concerns us not now to discuss whether ** miracles"
do or "do not happen." Certainly now no
miracles happen at the shrine of S. Thomas !
The end came in 1538, when, in the September
of that year, the tomb was destroyed. No record
exists describing its actual destruction, and hence
some doubt lingers — not about the fact, it is true
— but about the manner. Most probably the
bones were burned and " scattered to the winds."
As for the gold and silver and precious stones,
and all the valuables, Henry VIII. exercised his
royal prerogative to seize them for himself.
Nothing now remains but the vacant space
where once the shrine stood. The pavement still
gives evidence by the marks upon it of the rough-
and-ready way in which the smashing of precious
relics went on — while the depression in the floor,
worn by the toes of those who knelt upon the
step above, alone marks the scene of so many
prayers and supplications and vows and thanks-
givings !
Milliam Xambarbe, the Ikentiab
Hntiquari?,
By Frederick Ross, f.r.h.s.
KENT occupies a foremost position among
the counties of England in regard to
antiquities and historical associations. It was
the Cantii, the Celtic inhabitants of Kent, who
opposed so vigorously the landing of Julius Caesar
near upon two thousand years ago, and whose
country afterwards constituted a portion of the
Roman province of Britannia Prima. It was here
in the 5th century, after the departure of the
Romans, that Vortigern and Hengist contended
for the empire in two pitched battles, resulting in
the conquest by Hengist, the loss of four thousand
natives on the battlefield, and the establishment
of the Saxon Kingdom of Kent. It was here
where S. Augustine planted the banner of the
Cross, and re-established the Church and
Bishopric of Canterbury, on the spot where there
had been a Church and Bishopric of the Apostolic
Age, which had been trampled out by the
ii6 BYGONE KENT.
paganism of the Jutes and Saxons. And ever
since has Kent been the scene of important and
often tragical events in history, poHtics, social
upheavals of the serf claims, and, above all, of
significant incidents of an ecclesiastical character.
Thus there is in the annals of Kent, and in the
castles, abbeys, and towns of the county, an abun-
dance of material to occupy the pen of the
historian and topographical antiquary ; and it was
fitting and appropriate that the first published
county history should be that of Kent.
General topographical writers, who have
included Kent, there have been from the 2nd
century downwards, a series of geographers,
topographers, and annalists, some fairly correct,
others fabulous and abounding in miracles, such
as, says Fuller, it is difficult to digest. Of these
Ptolemy was the earliest, who was followed by
Antoninus Pius, whose works are invaluable as
records of the past. The writings of Julius
Caesar and Tacitus are scarcely worth mentioning
as topographical works — and much the same
may be said of Strabo, Pomponius, and other
copyists. Then followed the Monkish Chroniclers,
amongst whom Bede and Giraldus Cambrensis
stand out prominently ; and Geoffrey of
WILLIAM LA MBARDE. 1 1 7
Monmouth, of the 12th century, who published
some most astounding stories — hence to the time
of Henry VIII., when modern antiquarian and
topographical research may be said to have had
its birth.
Leland, a Londoner born, may be considered
the father of modern antiquaries. He lived in the
1 6th century, in the reign Henry VIII,, who
appointed him to the office of the Royal
Librarian, and in 1533 ** King's Antiquary," the
first and last to hold the office, whose duty was
" to search out England's historical antiquities,
and peruse the libraries of all Cathedrals, Abbies,
Priories, and Colleges, and all places wherein
records, writings, and secrets of antiquity were
preserved." In 1536, he was given a dispensa-
tion from residence in his living of Popeling, and
for six years wandered forth over England,
visiting and examining all the conventual,
ecclesiastical, and collegiate libraries, " con-
cerning," as he said " many good autors the which
otherwise had been like to have perischid." As a
result of his journeyings he wrote — "The
laboryeuse journey and serche of Johan Leylande
for Englande's antiquitees, geuen of hym as a
New Yeares gifte to Kynge Henry the VIII. in
ii8 BYGONE KENT.
the xxxvij. yeare of his Regne ;" dedicated to King
Edward VI. by John Bale, 1549. The " Itinerary
of John Leland the Antiquary," published from the
original MS. in the Bodleian Library, by
Thomas Hearne, m.a., 17 10- 12. These works
have served as the foundations of all subsequent
antiquarian and topographical researches. Ralf
Brooke, who printed Leland's " New Year.es
Gifte," says to Camden that he has done it "to
the ende that the world may know with whose
plumes you have feathered your nest, and to show
who was the first author of the new born
' Britannia,' he whose name is clean rased out
or you who have taken the tytle and whole credit
to yourself." He was a learned man, and the
author of some other works, and died in the year
1552.
The Tudor age sees the birth and labours
of the three great antiquaries — Leland, 1506-52,
Lambarde, 1 536-1601, and Camden, 1 551-1623,
who, discarding the miracles and fables of monkish
chroniclers, based the annals of England on a
sure foundation of fact, and taught writers that
the history of towns, counties, and limited
localities, with descriptions of their peculiarities
and ancient remains, are deserving of record. Of
WILLIAM LAMBARDE. 1 1 9
these writers, Lambarde, the second in date, less
rugged than Leland, and less polished than
Camden, will occupy our attention for a few
paragraphs. " I am now," says Camden, "come
to Kent, a county which William Lambarde,
a person eminent for piety and learning, has
described so much to the life in a complete
volume, and who has withal been so happy in his
searches, that he has left very little for those that
come after him, ... I here gratefully
acknov/ledge that his work is my foundation."
" Let this be observed for the honour of Kent,"
says Kennet, in his life of Somner, " that while
other counties (and but few of them) have met
with single pens to give the history and descrip-
tion of them ; ours has had no less than four
writers to celebrate the glories of it (1570)
" Lambard, Somner, Kilburn, and Philpot."
Archdeacon Nicolson hopes he may be allowed
"to enlarge the catalogue" (1696), adding
" Lambarde's Perambulation of Kent, was indeed
the first account that was published, which was
not only highly applauded by Camden and other
chief judges, but gave the hint to many more
men of learning to endeavour the like services for
their several counties," further observing that
1 26 BYGONE KENT.
" 'twas not well approved by the gentlemen of the
Roman Communion, notably Reiner, ' Antiquary
of Canterbury,' who censures it as a work under-
taken with a design to expose the lewdnesses and
debaucheries of the inhabitants of the monasteries
of that county, in describing whereof (he thinks)
many things are spitefully misrepresented." Dr.
Nicholson adds to the list of Kentish historical
writers the names of John Norden, whose
"Survey of Kent" remains in MS., John
Weaver, whose "Funeral Monuments" were
chiefly collected in the dioceses of Canterbury and
Rochester, Taylor's " History of Gavel- Kind,"
Gillingham's " History of Canterbury," circa 1390,
John Twyne's " Canterbury," W. Somner's
"Survey of Canterbury," Spott's "Canterbury,"
Archdeacon Battaly's " Antiquitates Rutupioe,"
Edm. Bedenham's " Textus Roffensis," etc.
The Lambardes were originally, as far back as
their recorded genealogy goes, a Herefordshire
family. Thomas Lambarde, " Gent.," of Ledbury,
who died early in the sixteenth century, was
father of William Lambarde of the same place,
whose son John settled in London, served
the office of Sheriff in 1551, and died in 1554;
having married Juliana, daughter and heiress of
WILLIAM LAMBARDE. 121
William Heme, of London, by whom he had issue
two sons, William, the antiquary, and Giles,
of London, the latter of whom married Margaret,
daughter and co-heiress of John Stephenson, of
London.
William, the elder son, married, first Jane,
daughter of George Multon, secondly Silvestria,
daughter and heiress of Robert Deane, of Hailing,
Kent, and relict, of William Dalison, and had
issue by the latter with a daughter — Margaret,
who married Thomas Godfrey, of Lydd, an only
son, Sir Multon, of Westcombe, near Greenwich,
who married Ann, daughter of Sir Thomas Lowe,
an alderman of London, and died in 1634. Sir
Multon was buried in Greenwich Old Church,
where a monument was placed to his memory,
which, with that of his father in the same church,
was removed to Sevenoaks, at the rebuilding of
Greenwich Church,
Thomas, his son, was a zealous Royalist during
the Civil War, had to compound for his estates in
1648, and in consequence was obliged to dispose
of Westcombe to Hugh Forth, from whom it passed
to the Biddulphs, Barts. It was purchased about
the year 1553, by Alderman John Lambarde, from
Nicholas Ballard, since which time it formed the
122 BYGONE KENT.
residence of the Lambardes until 1648. In 1638
he married Isabella, daughter of Sir John Garrard,
Baronet, and had issue, with two daughters,
Thomas, who died sine prole, and William.
William, his son, of Beechmount, Sevenoaks,
married Magdalen Humphrey, and had issue —
Thomas, his heir, and Sir Multon, Baronet, who
died in 1758. Thomas, his son, who died in
1745, was father of another Thomas, who died in
1769, whose son, Multon, was born in 1757, and
died in 1836, and was succeeded by his elder son,
William, of Beechmount, who was born in 1796,
and had issue by his wife, Harriet Elizabeth,
daughter of Sir James Nasmyth, Baronet,
Multon, his heir, born in 1821, who married in
1848 Teresa Livesay, daughter of Edmund
Turton, and had issue — John, Bell, William,
Edmund, and another son and daughter. Besides
whom William Lambarde had other issue — six
sons and five daughters.
William Lambarde, the subject of this sketch,
was the son of Alderman John Lambarde of
London, the purchaser of the Manor of West
Combe, by Greenwich, in 1553, where his son
chiefly resided, and where he wrote most of his
works. He was born in the year 1536, presum-
WILLIAM LAMBARDE. 123
ably in London, and was bred to the legal
profession, having been entered at Lincoln's Inn
in 1556, and distinguished himself early in his
career, by the publication of two or three legal
works, promising to become eminent in law, had
he not turned his attention more particularly to
the study of historical topography, then in its
infancy, when he took up his residence in Kent.
Nevertheless he attained a high degree in law,
having been elected a Bencher of Lincoln's Inn
in 1578; in 1592 a Master in Chancery; in 1597
Keeper of the Rolls in Chancery Lane ; and in
0OO Keeper of the Records in the Tower. In
1579 he was appointed a Justice of the Peace for
the County of Kent, in which capacity his well-
grounded knowledge of the laws and customs of
Kent proved of great use to himself and his
brother justices.
At Lincoln's Inn he studied under Lawrence
No well, who was famous for his profound know-
ledge of the Anglo-Saxon tongue and antiquities,
from whom he imbibed that taste for antiquarian
learning which has rendered his name so famous
in the history of Kent. In 1576 he founded a
hospital at Greenwich for twenty poor persons,
male or female, with an original allowance of six
124 BYGONE KENT.
shillings per month, afterwards increased to
fifteen shillings, and a yearly allowance of a
chaldron and half of coals ; preference in appoint-
ment to be given to aged, maimed, or blind,
persons impoverished by casualty, afflicted with
incurable sickness, or burthened with a large
family. He denominated the hospital — "The
College of Queen Elizabeth," and placed it under
the charge of the Master of the Rolls and the
Drapers' Company. It is said to have been the
first institution of the kind founded by a
Protestant.
He was a staunch Protestant — a protestor
against monkish tricks and miracles, and Popist
superstitions in general ; thus in the " Perambula-
tions," in speaking of Montindene, he states that
the Friars there, within memory, had an annual
procession in which " one berayed like a divel "
met the holy brethren and attempted to carry off
the cross, but was put to flight by the sprinkling
of holy water, " and thus forsooth, the virtue of
holy water in putting the divell to flight is
confirmed at Montindene by a demonstrative
argument ; which, if it be so, then greatly was St.
Paul deceaved in sixth of his epistle to the
Ephesians, where he goeth to arme us from toppe
WILLIAM LAMBAKDE. 1 2 5
to toe againste the assaultes of the divell, for
what needed he, good man, to recite sallet,
shield, sword, etc., when the holy waters ticke
would have served his turne." Respecting the
Boxley Rood of Grace, he informs us that a
carpenter having a block of wood, considered
with himself whether he should make it into
a bench or fashion it into a god, and finally
decided on the latter, whereupon he got together
some " wyer, paste, and paper," and with these
and his block of wood "he compacted a roode
of such exquixite arte, and excellencie that it
not onely matched in comelyness and due
proportion of the parts of the best of the
common sort, but in straunge motion, variety
of gesture, and nimbleness of joints, passed
al others that before had been scene ; the same
being able to bow downe and lift up itself, to
shake and stir the handes and feet, to nod the
head, to roll the eis, to wag the chaps, to bend the
brows, and finally to represent to this eie both the
proper motion of each member of the body, and
also a lively expresse and significant shew of a
well-contented or displeased minde." When
finished he placed it upon the back of a "jade"
and came into Kent to dispose of his god, but
126 BYGONE KENT.
the "jade" persisted in going to Boxley
Abbey, and nowhere else, where it was
left, and rendered the Abbey a famous place of
pilgrimage.
" Lambarde," says the English Cyclopaedia,
"■ was one of the most accurate antiquaries of his
day, and in all respects a man of learning and
worth."
He died at his residence, Westcombe, in 1601,
and was buried in the parish church of Greenwich,
with a monument placed over his remains. On
the rebuilding of that church his remains were
removed to Sevenoaks Church, which had
become the burial-place of his descendants.
The " Memoirs of Lambarde " were published
in Vol. I., No. XLIL, of Nichols' " Biblio Topog.
Brit.," 1787. Works. :—
" APXAIONOMIA, sive de priscis Anglorum
Legibus Libri, etc.," 1568; with Map of the
Saxon Heptarchy, Translation of a collection of
Saxon Laws, made by his College Tutor,
Lawrence Nowell. Reprinted in Wheloc's
edition of Bede, 1644. Bishop Nicholson styles
the translation " false and affected."
" ' A Perambulation of Kent,' collected and
written (for the most part) in the yeare 1570, and
WILLIAM LAMBARDE. 127
now increased by the addition of some things
which the Author himself hath observed since
that time, 1576. The first history of any separate
county. The 3rd and 5th editions, 1640 and
1656, contain the Charters of the Cinque Ports,
and the edition of 1826, is preceded by a sketch
of the Author's life."
" Dictionarium Angliae topographicum et his-
toricum : an Alphabetical Account of the chief
places in England and Wales, with Portrait of the
Author, 1730. This work, intended for a general
Survey of England, was written before the
appearance of Camden's ' Britannia,' upon the
publication of which work he relinquished the
undertaking, and it did not see the light until
1730."
" Eirenarcha, or the offices of the Justices of
the Peace; in two books, 1581, several subse-
quent editions up to 16 19."
" The Duties of Constables, Borsholders,
Tythingmen, etc., 1582. Several times reprinted,
up to 1637."
" Archion, or a commentary on the High
Courts of Justice in England, 1591."
^be IRevolt of the Dilleins in tbe E)a^0 of
Iking IRicbait) tbe Secon^,
By Edward Lamplough.
BEHIND the mail-clad baron of the fourteenth
century, in costly panoply, with emblazoned
surcoat and crested helmet— the advertisements
of his chivalric rank — there rose a dramatic
background, with a mediaeval fortress frowning
over fertile acres, in which toiled some scores of
sturdy peasants — the men whose sweat sustained
the profusion and pride of the barons, and
furnished them with pikemen and archers, when
clarions blared, and the King's standard was
carried over the borders of Scotland, or over sea
to France.
To such men as those Wiclif preached, and in
his free gospel there was a divine ring of free
humanity that touched the soul of vassal and
peasant, and increased their interest in the
rumours that reached them from beyond sea — of
Van Artavelde and Dubois, with the white-hoods
at their back, and the lion of Flanders fleeing
REVOLT OF THE VILLEINS. 129
before them ; of the armed resistance of the
French peasantry to the collectors of their
taxmasters. Commerce and trade were lifting the
inhabitants of the towns to freedom and affluence ;
and the peasant who abode in a town for a
twelve-month and a day, unclaimed of his lord,
became a free man. Between villein and noble
rose the merchant and manufacturer, yielding
allegiance only to the state, representing the
commons of England in Parliament, and by
example pointing the peasant to higher and truer
conditions of life.
The peasantry had suffered from the French
wars ; in the building of Windsor Castle, King
Edward had constrained each county to furnish
its proportion of the necessary workmen ; and
when the nation was scourged, and the population
reduced, by the sweating sickness, raising the
value of labour, a law was passed making the old
wages compulsory ; but such a law could not,
even then, be carried out. The prosperous
villeins, land- tenants, and copy-holders purchased
in the King's Court exemption from servitude,
leagued themselves together for mutual protection,
"and would not suffer distress to be taken either
by the servants of their lords, or the officers of
K
I30 BYGONE KENT.
justice." Parliament declared the exemptions
valueless, and threatened the confederates with
punishment.
The ruler made the laws ; the villein was the
source of his wealth. Among the peasantry
moved a priest, John Ball, who loved to take for
his text the couplet,
" When Adam delved and Eve span,
Pray who was the gentleman ?"
The villeins admired the text, and agreed with
the sermon, but the Archbishop of Canterbury
clapped the popular preacher into prison at
Maidstone.
The following examples of the preaching
popular with the peasantry are interesting and
instructive.
" John Balle Seynte Marye prist greteth wele
alle maner men, and byddes hem in the name of
the Trinite, Fadur and Sone and Holy Gost,
stond manlycke togedyr in trewthe, and helpeth
trewthe and trewthe schal helpe yowe. Now
regneth pride in pris, and covetise is holde wys ;
and lecherye with outen shame, and glotonye with
outen blame ; envye regneth with tresone, and
slouthe is take in grete sesone. God do bote, for
now is tyme. Amen."
REVOLT OF THE VILLEINS. 131
" lakke Mylner asket help to turn his mylne
aright. He hath grounden smal smal ; the King's
sone of heven he seal pay for alle. Loke thy
Mylne go aryght with the four sayles and the
post stand in steadfastnesse. With ryght and
with myght, with skill and with wylle, let myght
help ryght, and skyl go before wylle and ryght
before myght, then goth our mylne aright. And
if myght go before ryght, and wylle before skylle,
then is our mylne mys a dyght."
In January, 1380, Parliament made a spirited
attempt to curb the extravagance of the Court.
Nevertheless, in the autumn of the same year
increased subsidies were demanded. In reply
they stigmatised the demand as " outrageous and
insupportable." The fatal capitation tax was then
resorted to. It demanded three groats per head
for every male and female who had come to the
age of fifteen years. Indulgence was extended to
the poor of some districts, the tax being graduated,
so that while the mass of the people paid one
groat each, the rich paid sixty groats per head.
Government required the money with the least
possible delay, and accordingly farmed the tax.
Probably the indignant peasantry would have
revolted against the imposition under any
132 BYGONE KENT.
circumstances, but when hired collectors added
insolence and extortion to oppression, the rising
was sudden and furious. The first amount came
short of the calculation. Commissioners were
appointed to investigate the collection, and
demanded further payments. The people, sullen
and brooding, refused to pay. Commissioner
Thomas de Bampton tried conclusions with the
delinquents of Fobbings, Essex. He and his
officers they chased out of Brentwood. The
Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, Sir Robert
Bealknass, was deputed to deal with the rebels of
Kent. He was denounced as a traitor to King
and Kingdom, and also retired in haste before the
raging mob that spread through the country,
carrying as ensigns the heads of the jurors and
clerks of court, elevated on long poles. The
insurgent leader was a priest known only by his
no7n de guerre of Jack Straw.
The Lord Treasurer's mansion was then visited
by the enraged peasantry, and was found to
contain an ample provision of meats and liquors ;
Sir John having, in his capacity of Prior of the
Knights of St. John of Jerusalem, summoned a
chapter-general of the order, and generously
provided for their entertainment. After con-
REVOLT OF THE VILLEINS. 133
suming the provisions, the rebels demolished the
house.
The whole of Essex was in arms, a tumultuary
force, undisciplined, and rudely armed with clubs,
bows, pikes, and swords. While the people thus
trembled on the eve of aggression, the tragic
event whose incidents are so well known took
place at Dartford, in Kent, at the house of Walter
the Tyler. The fate of Tyler was decided.
Agents from Essex were calling the men of Kent
• to arm in the common cause, for the reformation
of the government and the abolition of taxes ; and
Tyler's rash act had brought him a large following
of discontented spirits, for "the rude officers had
in many places made the like trial." The revolt
spread from the Thames to the H umber.
Leaders came to the front, nameless men, known
to the peasantry as Jakke Milner, Jak Carter, Jak
Treweman, and John Balle.
Tyler and his fellows requested the villeins of
the revolted counties to march upon London, and
fully 60,000 men converged upon the capital,
determined " that there should not be one
bondman in England." At Maidstone they
released John Ball from his bonds. Rochester
Castle they surprised, liberating a man claimed
134 BYGONE KENT.
by Sir Simon Burley as his bondman, although
the poor fellow swore he had lived over a year and
a day at Gravesend. Sir Simon had been content
that the unfortunate man should languish in prison,
although he placed upon him a price of three
hundred pounds of silver.
When the insurgents poured into Canterbury,
John Ball is said to have called for the death of
the archbishop, but that prelate had fled to
London ; they had, however, the satisfaction of
pulling down his house. They terrified the
monks and residents ; exacted from the mayor
and aldermen an oath of fidelity to the King and
commons, and advanced upon London, after
hewing off the heads of three wealthy citizens.
They carried with them the governor, Sir John
Newton. The King's mother had been making
a pilgrimage to Canterbury, and was surprised by
the peasantry. She and her ladies were allowed
to proceed on their journey, after being saluted
with kisses by a few of the rude fellows.
Concentrated at Blackheath, 100,000 strong,
they dispatched Sir John Newton to the King,
with complaints of the national mismanagement,
the assurance that they were acting for his
Majesty's honour, and a demand that the Arch-
REVOLT OF THE VILLEINS. 135
bishop of Canterbury should render an account of
his administration of the revenue. Sir John's
children were retained as hostagfes for his fidelity,
and he was naturally anxious to conciliate the
King. Richard understood his subject's peculiar
position, and as a temporising policy was the
most likely to serve his interest, he accordingly
returned a gracious answer to the peasants,
promising to see them on the morrow. The
villeins received the royal message with great
satisfaction.
He appeared before them on the following day,
but on the river in his barge. He was welcomed
with a tremendous cheer from 10,000 men
massed on the banks at Rotherhithe, with two
banners of St, George and sixty pennons stream-
ing over their tumultuary array. The cry of
welcome carried terror into the hearts of King
and courtiers, and his barge was immediately
turned back, the Earl of Salisbury excusing the
King from landing by asserting that the peasants
were not formed in proper array to receive him.
Stung to sudden fury by their disappointment,
the army surged upon London, tearing down
abbeys and fair houses, if Froissart may be
credited. Prison doors were beaten in, and the
136 BYGONE KENT.
liberated felons swelled the ranks of their
deliverers. They invaded the Archbishop's
palace at Lambeth, made a fire of his furniture,
and committed the chancery records to the
flames.
London Bridge barred their advance, but they
had sympathisers within the gates. The bridge
fell, and, once within the city, they were hospitably
entertained by the people. A few houses were
sacked, a number of Flemings slain, and the
Duke of Lancaster's palace, the Savoy, was
assaulted. Its defenders were killed, and the
building burnt. They found the Duke's liquor so
much to their taste, that thirty of their men
perished in the flames, overcome by intoxication.
Even in rage and desperation, and despite their
ranks being swollen by idle and dissolute persons,
they maintained the integrity of their intentions,
and finding one of their number in the act of
appropriating a silver cup, they flung man and
cup into the river together. They destroyed the
house of the Hospitallers in Clerkenwell ; and
their common question to all comers was, " With
whom boldest thou ?" and woe to him who made
other reply than, " With King Richard and the
Commons," for on the instant his head -rolled in
REVOLT OF THE VILLEINS. 137
the dust. Newgate, the Fleet, and the Temple
were destroyed. Their furious pursuit of Lom-
bards, Flemings, and other foreigners, led to
frequent violations of the privilege of sanctuary.
The army was formed into three divisions, one
occupied Heybury, and burnt the house of the
Knights of St. John in that locality ; the men of
Essex and Hertfordshire formed the second body,
and occupied Mile-End-Green ; the third division
took up their quarters at Tower Hill and St.
Catharine. Threatening messages were sent to
Richard, and the provisions intended for his use
were seized.
On the following morning, a royal herald pro-
claimed to the rebels before the Tower his
Majesty's decision to honour them with a confer-
ence at Mile-End. In due course he rode forth
with a few friends, but so threatening was the
appearance of the villeins, that Richard's uterine
brothers, the Earl of Kent and Sir John Holland,
spurred off in alarm, although the latter was a
man of ferocious courage. The Tower was
sufficiently guarded to have defied the utmost
rage of the insurgents, yet, aided by the fears or
treachery of the garrison, Wat Tyler and Jack
Straw contrived to gain possession of the fort-
138 BYGONE KENT.
ress, and with it those doomed objects of their
resentment, Sir Robert Hales, tlie treasurer ; the
Archbishop of Canterbury, the chancellor ;
William Appledore, Richard's confessor ; and
four of the tax-farmers. Short and bloody work
was made with them, and the Archbishop's head,
with the hat nailed on, was carried on point of
lance to London Bridge, and there stuck up.
Again the King's mother fell into their hands,
and, after some rough salutes, was carried off in a
fainting condition by her attendants.
At Mile-End the more reasonable of the
villeins presented their demands : The abolition
of bondage ; the reduction of the rent of land to
fourpence the acre ; the free liberty of buying
and selling in all markets ; a general pardon for
past offences. Richard readily, and with courtly
grace, agreed to these not immoderate demands,
and promised to supply the peasants with royal
banners, under the protection of which they were
to march home ; with the exception of two or
three persons from each village, who were to wait
for the royal charters, in the copying of which
thirty clerks were occupied the whole of the
night.
The young King sought his mother at her
REVOLT OF THE VILLEINS. 139
house, the Wardrobe, in Carter Lane ; and on the
following morning, after attending mass at West-
minster, rode through Smithfield, with sixty
horse in attendance, and held a conference with
Wat Tyler, who had 20,000 men at his back.
Wat is said to have repudiated the charter
granted on the previous day, to have demanded
the abolition of the game or forest laws, with the
privilege of taking fish in all waters, and the free-
dom of chase in park, forest, and field. Against
him was also levelled the accusation of plotting
the massacre of the royal retinue, and the seizure
of the King, in whose name he proposed to
govern the nation.
On Richard's arrival the rebel leader rode up
to him so close that the horses touched, and,
pointing to his followers, boasted of their fidelity,
declaring that they would not depart without the
King's letters. Richard's life was unquestionably
in the hands of the villeins, but he maintained
his temper, and exhibited unfaltering courage.
According to Froissart, Tyler exhibited unbounded
insolence, and demanded the life of one of the
royal squires ; whereon Sir William Walworth
drew near with twelve horse, and reproved his
insolence. To him the doomed man made stern
140 BYGONE KENT.
reply, but was butchered the next moment by the
doughty Mayor, whether by thrust of sword or
blow of mace matters not.
Enraged by the death of their leader, but
obviously unprepared to slay the King, the
insurgents clamoured loudly, and stood to their
arms, when Richard rode up to them, exhorted
them to accept him as their leader, and concern
themselves no further about the traitor who had
fallen. Some believed the boy- King, and followed
him ; others, distrusting his Majesty's intentions,
withdrew from the press, and made for the
country. Arrived at Islington, the insurgents
found looo men-at-arms awaiting them, under the
command of Sir Robert Knowles. A scene of
confusion followed. Some turned to fly, others
fell on their knees, imploring the King's pardon,
and doubtless others stood to their arms to
strike a last blow for life or vengeance. Knowles
was impatient to charge, and a bloody tragedy
would probably have been enacted had not
Richard wisely resolved to let the peasants depart
in peace. He contented himself with proclaim-
ing death to any strangers remaining overnight in
the city. Once dispersed and powerless, the
peasantry could be punished at leisure.
REVOLT OF THE VILLEINS. 141
The death of Tyler, and the dispersion of the
insurgents, came in good time, for numerous
hostile bands were making for the capital. The
men of Hertfordshire did not disperse on receiv-
ing news of the disastrous ending of the move-
ment, but extorted the written acknowledgement
of their freedom from their lords, and at St.
Albans 'kindled a fire in the market-place, and
consumed therein the charters and privileges of
the Abbey, which they had compelled the Abbot
to deliver into their hands. The story of the
disturbances in the different eastern counties, —
Suffolk, Cambridge, Norfolk, Huntingdon, — need
not be related here. Spencer, the doughty
bishop of Norwich, played a great part in
suppressing these.
So determined were the men of Essex that
they sent deputies to Richard praying for a
confirmation of their charter, but their time of
triumph was past, and that of Richard had
dawned. His standard streamed on Blackheath,
surrounded by 40,000 men ; and on the 30th of
June, having commanded all vassals to return to
their duty, he despatched an expedition into Kent,
to complete the pacification of that county, while
he marched against the men of Essex, having
142 BYGONE KENT.
first stuck a clump of ghastly heads, including
Wat Tyler's, over London Bridge. At Billericay
and Sudbury those obstinate sticklers for liberty
struck fiercely against his arms, and sealed their
devotion to the cause in which they were engaged
by streams of peasant-blood, before they submitted
to the King's grace. After this Richard was able
to complete his progress through the kingdom,
restoring tranquility, and gathering up the charters
wrung from him under the cruel compulsion of
peasant force. John Ball, Jack Straw, and
Westbroome were among the leaders who suffered
execution. Luttester and Westbroome are reputed
to have pretended to the title of Kings of Norfolk
and Suffolk ; but the peasants have no voice in
history, the story of their revolt is bequeathed to
us by the pens of their enemies, and doubtless
absurd rumours, and the ravings of intoxicated
slaves, have been recorded as the studied
statements of the leaders.
The Commons, in summing up the causes of the
revolt, were just to the unfortunate peasantry, and
imputed their action to the burthens cast upon
them by the lengthy wars, the rapacity of
tax-collecters, the extortion of the purveyors, and
the outrages committed by the numerous bands of
REVOLT OF THE VILLEINS. 143
outlaws that infested the country, and preyed
upon the poor. They were so far in sympathy
with the people that they were with great difficulty
induced to grant further taxes ; but on wringing
the concession from them, Richard pardoned the
villeins, of whom, according to Holinshed, he
had put 1 500 to death during his progress through
the country.
The popular notion that Richard acted so very
wisely in his dealings with the peasantry, who
were certainly loyal to the boy-king, looking to
him as the redresser of their wrongs, is hardly
borne out by the tone of his address to them,
when he felt himself to be once more safe : —
" Rustics ye have been and are," he is reported to
have said, " and in bondage shall ye remain ; not
such as ye have heretofore known, but in a
condition incomparably more vile."
IRoi^al leitbam.
By Joseph W. Spurgeon.
" Pity the fall of such a goodly pile." — Shirley.
THE precise date of the first erection of a
palace at Eltham is involved in some
obscurity. The work is generally, and doubtless
correctly, attributed to Anthony Bek, Bishop of
Durham from 1283 to 131 1. Most writers on
the subject agree, too, in suggesting the year
1270 as possibly the one which saw the completion
of the buildings, thus adopting the opinion
expressed by Lambarde, in his " Perambulation
of Kent," as follows : —
" King Henrie the third (saith Mat. Parise) toward the latter
ende of his reigne, kept a Royall Christmas (as the manner
then was) at Elthajn, being accompanied with his Queene and
Nobilitie : and this (belike) was the first warming of the house
(as I may call it) after that the Bishop had finished his worke."
It is more likely, however, that the Bishop had
not even begun his work, as I will endeavour to
show. First, it will be necessary to mention a
few facts in the career of this remarkable man.
He was born probably about the year 1240, his
ROYAL ELTHAM. 145
father being Walter, Baron of Eresby. In 1270
he went with Prince Edward to the Crusades,
and, it may be presumed, was with him until his
return in 1274. Taking orders soon afterwards,
he was appointed in 1283 to the see of Durham ;
but his propensities fitted him better for the life of
a courtier and soldier than that of an ecclesiastic.
"He loved military parade, and had always
kniehts and soldiers about him." He was often
employed in important political negotiations,
especially in the matter of the Scottish succession
in 1290. In the campaign which followed (1296-
1304) he took a prominent part, receiving the
submission of Balliol, and holding high command,
riding at the head of the army by the king's side.
His extravagance was proverbial, and his ambition
unbounded. The Pope gave him the proud but
empty title of " Patriarch of Jerusalem ;" the king
gave him more substantial benefits, making him
Count Palatine of Durham, and King of the Isle
of Man.
Part of the manor of Eltham, which from time
immemorial had belonged to the Crown, was
conferred by Edward I. upon John, first Baron
de Vesci, of Alnwick, who, dying in 1288, left his
possessions to his brother, William de Vesci.
146 BYGONE KENT.
The latter, before his death in 1297, made them
over to Anthony Bek, as trustee for his little
natural son, but the covetous bishop defrauded
the orphan of his inheritance, and by some legal
trick made himself master of the property, after
which, as I take it, he built Eltham Palace.
From the foregoing it will be seen that Eltham
could not have been granted to Bek by William
de Vesci until after his brother's death in 1288;
therefore the Christmas Feast of 1270 must have
been held, not in Bishop Bek's palace, but in
the manor-house which doubtless preceded it.
Further, it is unlikely that the Bishop was' able to
misappropriate the manor before the decease of
William de Vesci in 1297, or that he commenced
building before he was certain of possessing the
estate. This would bring the probable date of the
erection of the building to about 1 300, and would
also dispose of the statement that he bequeathed it
to Queen Eleanor, for she died in 1290. However
this may be, it is known that the Bishop made the
palace his favourite residence, and breathed his
last there in 1 3 1 1 .
Three years before that date the palace was
honoured by what appears to be the first royal
visit. Edward II., on his arrival from France
ROYAL ELTHAM. 147
with his bride, Isabella, brought her to Eltham,
where they remained for about fifteen days await-
ing their coronation.
It was not until after the decease of Anthony
Bek that Eltham became, properly speaking, a
royal residence ; indeed, it is evident that the
Bishop's legatee was Queen Isabella, not Queen
Eleanor. With the reign of Edward II. the
history of the palace begins, which, if completely
told, would fill a fair-sized book. I can therefore
only select the most important events, of which a
few of minor interest, though not unworthy of
mention, may first be briefly summarised.
Eltham was the scene of three royal births, the
first being that of Prince John, second son of
Edward II., in 13 16, who was created Earl of
Cornwall, but was better known as " John of
Eltham," and whose tomb is in Westminster
Abbey. Two princesses also were born here,
namely, Philippa, daughter of Lionel, Duke of
Clarence, in 1355, afterwards Countess of March,
and Bridget, seventh daughter of Edward IV., in
1480, who became Prioress of Dartford. These
three infants, and also Katherine, Edward IV.'s
sixth daughter, were christened at Eltham.
Edward III., when a boy, was partly educated
148 BYGONE KENT.
here, Griffin, the son of Sir Griffin of Wales,
being one of his companions. Three royal
brides were brought to the palace, whence, after a
short stay, each went forth to her coronation ;
they were (i) Isabella the Fair, wife of Edward
II., as already mentioned; (2) Isabella of Valois,
Richard II.'s child-queen; and (3) Elizabeth
Woodville, married a year previously to Edward
IV. Edward III. held at least three Parlia-
ments at Eltham, on the last occasion, in 1376,
creating his grandson Prince of Wales. In 1386
Richard II. here received a deputation from both
Houses, opposing his intended invasion of France,
and in 1395 held an important council, of which
further mention will be made. The festival of
Christmas, with the splendour which in those
days characterised its observance by royalty, was
often celebrated here ; notably by the Duke of
Clarence in 1347, Richard II. in 1384, 1385,
and 1386, Henry IV. in 1400, 1405, 1409,
and 141 2, Henry V. in 1414, Henry VI. in
1429, Edward IV. in 1482, and Henry VIII. in
1515. 1523. and 1525.
Passing now to those historical matters which
deserve to be treated of more fully, and taking
them in chronological order, we commence with
ROYAL ELTHAM. 149
the year 1364. which was one of the proudest in
the history of Eltham.
King John of France, who was taken prisoner
by the Black Prince at the battle of Poitiers in
1356, had, after the signing of the treaty of
Bretigny, returned to France to arrange for
payment of his ransom, leaving as hostage his
son, the Duke of Anjou. The latter, however,
broke his parole, and left England ; but John sent
the young Lord Ingebrand de Coucy in his stead.
De Coucy's captivity brought him unexpected
good fortune, for he succeeded in gaining the
affections of Isabella, the Princess-royal. The
French king, finding his Government repudiated
the terms of the treaty, voluntarily returned to
England in 1364. saying that if honour were lost
elsewhere upon earth, it ought to be found in the
conduct of kings. Froissart thus tells the story of
his reception : —
" News was brought to the king of England (who at that
time was with his queen at Eltham, a very magnificent palace
which the king had, seven miles from London) that the King of
France had landed at Dover. . . . The third day he [king
John] set out, taking the road to London, and rode on until he
came to Eltham, where the king of England was, with a
number of lords, ready to receive him. It was on a Sunday,
in the afternoon, that he arrived ; there were, therefore,
ISO BYGONE KENT.
between this time and supper, many grand dances and carols.
The young Lord de Coucy was there, who took pains to shine
in his dancing and singing whenever it was his turn. ... I
can never relate how very honourably and magnificently the
king and queen of England received King John. On leaving
Eltham, he went to London,"
where, in the Savoy Palace, he died on April 8th
of the same year. Next year de Coucy was
married to the princess, but unfortunately they
did not live happily ever after, their romantic
attachment ending twelve years later in a
separation.
The last days of Edward III. were spent at
Eltham and Shene, where, broken down in health
and spirit, and worn out with his active life, he
was left almost alone, deserted by his friends.
He died at Shene in 1377.
Richard II. was at Eltham, keeping Christmas,
in 1386, when there came to him Leo, King of
Armenia, "under pretence," says Stow, "to
reform peace betwixt the kings of England and
France ; but what his coming profited he only
understood ; for besides innumerable gifts that he
received, . . . the king granted to him a
charter of a thousand pounds by year during his
life. He was, as he affirmed, chased out of his
kingdom by the Tartarians."
ROYAL ELTHAM. 151
In 1395, Richard, having lost his " Good Queen
Anne," summoned his council to Eltham, partly
to broach to them his intention of marrying
Isabella of Valois, and partly to lay before them a
petition from Guienne, asking that that province,
which Richard had conferred upon the Duke of
Lancaster, might remain an appanage of the
English crown. While the council was deliberat-
ing, Jean Froissart, the famous chronicler and
poet, was at the palace, waiting for an opportunity
to present the king with a volume of his poems.
He relates at length the doings of this parliament,
as told him by Sir Richard Sturry. The Duke
of Gloucester opposed the petition, and —
" To show that he governed the king and was the greatest in
the council, as soon as he had delivered his opinion and saw
that many were murmuring at it, and that the prelates and lords
were discussing it in small parties, he quitted the king's chamber,
followed by the earl of Derby, and entered the hall at Eltham,
where he ordered a table to be spread, and they both sat down
to dinner while others were debating the business. When the
duke of York heard they were at dinner, he joined them. . . .
On the Sunday, the whole council were gone to London,
excepting the duke of York, who remained with the king, and
sir Richard Sturry : these two, in conjunction with sir Thomas
Percy, mentioned me again to the king, who desired to see the
book I had brought for him. . . . The king asked me
what the book treated of: I replied 'Of love!' He was pleased
with the answer, and dipped into several places, reading parts
152 BYGONE KENT.
aloud, for he read and spoke French perfectly well, and then
gave it to one of his knights, called sir Richard Credon, to
carry to his oratory, and made me many acknowledgments
for it."
While at Eltham in the following August
(1396), the king was informed of a plot against
him, headed by the Duke of Gloucester ; who
soon afterwards was seized and conveyed to
Calais, there to meet his death.
The historic quarrel, in 1398, between the
Dukes of Norfolk and Hereford, when in the
king's presence each accused the other of treason,
occurred, according to Froissart, at Eltham
Palace. * The king decided that on September
1 6th, at Coventry, they should .settle their differ-
ence by mortal combat ; but when the time
arrived, having changed his mind, he forbade the
duel to proceed, and sentenced both combatants
to banishment, Hereford for ten years, and Nor-
folk for life. Before one year had passed,
however, Hereford returned to claim his father's
estates, and gained possession, not only of his
* Froissart is often inaccurate as to details, and even in the account of
this transaction he makes three mistakes, calling Norfolk and Hereford
respectively by their earlier titles of Earl Marshal and Earl of Derby, and
placing the scene of the combat at Eltham instead of Coventry. We must
not, therefore, place too much reliance on his statement that the quarrel
took place at Eltham. See Shakespeare's Richard II.
ROYAL ELTHAM. 153
inheritance, but of the throne of England. After
Richard's abdication and death, the Constable of
France, Count d'Albret, came to enquire after
the welfare of the young widowed queen
Isabella. He and his party were received by
Henry at Eltham, and splendidly entertained,
both before and after their visit to Isabella at
Ha vering-atte- Bower.
In 1402 an unusual ceremony, that of marriage
by proxy, was performed at Eltham Palace. The
cause of this strange proceeding was the exist-
ence of two rival popes, of whom the one at
Avignon was favoured by the bride, Joanna of
Navarre, while the bridegroom, Henry IV.,
supported him who ruled at Rome. Joanna,
however, outwitted her particular pope by obtain-
ing from him permission to marry anyone she
pleased within the fourth degree of consanguinity,
without naming the person. She then sent
Antoine Riczi, one of her esquires, to England,
with authority to make a contract of matrimony
in her name with King Henry. He was received
on the 3rd of April at Eltham, and, the articles of
the transaction being signed, " Henry plighted
his nuptial troth to Antoine Riczi, and placed the
bridal ring on his finger .... on which the
154 BYGONE KENT.
trusty squire, having received Henry's plight,
pronounced that of Joanna in these words : —
' I, Antoiiie Riczi, in the name of my worshipful lady,
Joanna, the daughter of Charles, lately king of Navarre,
duchess of Bretagne, and countess of Richmond, take you,
Henry of Lancaster, king of England and lord of Ireland, to
be my husband, and thereto I, Antoine, in the spirit of my
said lady, plight you my troth.' "
In 141 2. the king kept his last Christmas at
Eltham, "being," as Holinshed puts it, "sore
vexed with sicknesse, so that it was thought
sometime that he had beene dead. Notwithstand-
ing it pleased God that he somewhat recovered
his strength againe, and so passed that Christmasse
with as much joy as he might."
Henry V., while keeping Christmas here in
141 3-14, was alarmed by a rumour that the
Lollards were assembling in arms, intending to
seize his person. The report was probably false,
but it caused a sudden removal of the court to
Westminster, and led to the execution of some
forty Lollards. In 141 5, on his return from the
great victory of Agincourt, the king stayed one
night at Eltham with his prisoners, the French
noblemen, among them the Dukes of Orleans
and Bourbon, who were subsequently again
c .«
^■^
o ^
156 BYGONE KENT.
lodged there. It was here, in 14 16, that Henry-
received Sigismund, Emperor of Germany, who
was conducted to the palace in great state, and
magnificently entertained. The objects of his
visit were to establish peace between England
and France, and to enlist the aid of Henry in
putting an end to the ecclesiastical dissensions of
the time.
The boy-king Henry VI. stayed at Eltham
on his return from Paris, where he had been
crowned " King of France ;" and after his
marriage he restored and beautified it, with other
palaces, in honour of the queen. In 1460, after
his capture by the Yorkists at Northampton,
Henry was brought to Eltham, and allowed to
indulge in hunting and other sports, which,
though he was a prisoner, and his wife and child
fugitives, he seems to have greatly enjoyed.
By Edward IV. the palace was repaired and
enlarged, the principal work being the rebuilding
of the banqueting-hall, and the placing oi a stone
brido-e across the moat instead of the wooden
drawbridge. Both these remain to the present
day. The reasons usually given for crediting
Edward IV. with the erection of the Hall are
(i) the style of its architecture, which corresponds
ROYAL ELTHAM. 157
with that of other buildings of his reign, and (2)
the special badge of this monarch, namely, the
rose en soleil, which is to be seen in one of
the spandrels of the principal doorway. More
conclusive evidence, however, is supplied by an
ancient document, still preserved, which contains
particulars of the
"Cost and Expenses don upon the bildyng of the newe
Halle wtyn the manor of Eltham, in the charge of James
Hatefeld, from Sonday the xixth day of Septembr the xixth yere
of the reigne of our Sovreyn lord Kyng Edward the iiijth unto
Sonday the iijd of October, the yere aforeseid. * [1479.]
In 1482, probably on the completion of the
work, the king held his Christmas festivities here
in splendid style, more than two thousand guests
being daily entertained.
The short reigns of Edward V. and Richard
III. afford no items of Eltham history, but
Lambarde, writing in 1570, says "it is not yet
fully out of memorie, that king Henry the seventh,
set up the faire front over the mote there" —
doubtless on the western side, where there are
still indications of a former range of buildings.
But Henry VII. was the last monarch who paid
more than occasional visits to the palace, "since
* Treasury of rect. ofExchq. , Paper docum. Portfo. ii. No. 1644.
158 BYGONE KENT.
whose reigne," says the same writer, "this house,
by reason of the neerenesse to Greenewicke,
. . . hath not beene so greatly esteemed : the
rather also for that the pleasures of the emparked
groundes here, may be in manner as well enjoyed,
the Court lying at Greenwiche, as if it were at
this house it selfe."
Nevertheless, excepting Prince Arthur, all the
children of Henry VII. were educated at Eltham,
where, in January 1500, the great scholar
Erasmus was introduced to them by his friend
Mr. Thomas More, afterwards Lord Chancellor.
" When they came into the great Hall, they saw
the whole train of the young Princes. In the
middle stood Prince Henry, then nine years of
age ; foreshewing the signs and tokens of majesty,
a greatness of mind supported by a singular
humanity." After the visit, Erasmus composed a
long poem in praise of England and the royal
family, which he sent to Prince Henry, and so
commenced their frequent correspondence.
Henry VIII., though generally preferring
Greenwich, spent Christmas here on three
occasions, the first of which, in 1 515-16, was
marked by unusual splendour. On the
Christmas Eve, after vespers. Cardinal Wolsey
ROYAL ELTHAM. 159
took the oath and office of Lord Chancellor, in
place of Archbishop Warham, who had resigned.
When Twelfth-night came, a grand entertainment
was given in the great hall. Among the state
papers at the Record Office is one giving an
account of this masque, which, if only for its
quaint spelling, is worth quoting. A castle of
timber having been prepared, and, as Holinshed
has it, " wonderouslie set out," Master William
Cornish and the children of the chapel performed
"the story of Troylous and Pandor rychly inparylled, allso
Kallkas and Kryssyd inparylled lyke a wedow of onour, in
blake sarsenet and other abelements for seche mater ; Dyomed
and the Greks inparylled lyke men of warre, akordyng to the
intent or porpoos.* After weche komedy playd and doon, an
harroud \i.e. herald] tryd and mad an oy that 3 strange knyghts
war cum to do batall with [those] of the sayd kastell ; owt
weche yssud 3 men of arms with punchyng spers, redy to do
feets at the barryers, inparylled in whyghthe saten and greeyn
saten of Bregys, f lynd with gren sarsenet and whyght sarsenet,
and the saten cut ther on. To the sayd 3 men of arms
entered other 3 men of arms with lyke wepuns, and
inparylled in sclops of reed sarsenet and yelow sarsenet, and
with speers mad sartayn strooks ; and after that doon, with
nakyd swerds fawght a fayer batayll of 12 strooks, and so
departyd of foors. Then out of the kastell ysseud a quyen,
and with her 6 ladyes, with spechys after the devyes of Mr.
* The story was evidently Chaucer's Troilus and Cressida, largely a
translation of Boccaccio's Filostrato.
t Bruges?
i6o BYGONE KENT.
Kornyche ; and after thys doon, 7 mynstrells inparylled in long
garments and bonets to the saam of saten of Bregys, whyght
and greeyn, un the walls and towrys of the sayd kastell played a
melodyus song. Then cam out of the kastell 6 lords and
gentyllmen inparelled in garments of whyght saten of Bregys
and greyn, browdyrd with counterfyt stuf of Flandyrs making,
as brochys, ouchys, spangs and seche ; and allso 6 ladyes
inparelld in 6 garments of ryght saten, whyght and greeyn, set
with H and K* of yelow saten, poynted together with poynts
of Kolen goUd. Thes 6 garments for ladyes wer of the Kyng's
stoor, newly repayryd. Allso the sayd ladyes heeds inparylled
with loos golld of damask, as well as with wovyn flat goUd of
damaske," [etc. — then follows an account of the expenditure.]
On the conclusion of these performances, "the
banket," says Holinshed, "was served in of two
hundred dishes, with great plentie to everie
bodie."
On the Eve of Epiphany, 1524, at the end of
the Christmas holidays, the king and queen
received Longland, Bishop of Lincoln, who had
come to explain to the queen the plans of Christ
Church College, Wolsey's new foundation at
Oxford. The festival in 1525, because of an
epidemic in the city, was held at Eltham with
only a few guests, and was named the " Still
Christmas." It was on this occasion that Wolsey
presented the king with the lease of Hampton
* The initials of the king and queen, a pet idea of Henry's ; though the
second letter had rather frequently to be altered !
ROYAL ELTHAM. i6i
Court Palace. At the same time he drew up a
most minute and elaborate set of "Articles
devised by the King's highness, with the advice
of his council, for the establishment of good order
and reformation of sundry errors and misuses in
his most honourable household and chamber."
These rules, which are too long to quote, are
preserved among the state papers, and are known
as the Statutes of Eltham. They are said to
contain precedents for many of the Court customs
of the present day.
After this date the royal visits to Eltham were
but few. On July 21, 1555, Queen Mary
removed from St. James's Palace, taking a barge
to Lambeth, whence she drove to Eltham Palace,
escorted by Cardinal Pole, Lords Pembroke and
Montague, and others. Over 10,000 persons
assembled to see her, this being, as is supposed,
her first appearance since her mysterious illness.
Oueen Elizabeth, who when an infant had often
been taken to Eltham, paid at least one important
visit to the palace, on August 6th, 1559,
nine months after her accession, when she met
there the Earl of Arran, son of the former Regent
of Scotland. The young Earl, who was handsome
but weak-minded, had been at one time regarded
1 62 BYGONE KENT.
as the future husband of Mary Queen of Scots,
and was subsequently proposed as a suitable con-
sort for Elizabeth. Evidently the object of this
interview was to ascertain his prospects in that
direction. Elizabeth, as she was wont to do with
her admirers, appeared to encourage him, all the
while scheming how to utilise his devotion for her
political ends. Three years later his weak mind
gave way altogether, and he never recovered his
reason ; perhaps disappointment had something to
do with it.
In this reign the palace was usually occupied
by Sir Christopher Hatton ; after which time, with
the exception of one visit of James I. in May and
June, 1612, and one of Charles I. in November,
1629, it was abandoned by royalty. On the
passing of the Self-denying Ordinance, in 1645,
the Earl of Essex resigned his commission, and
retired to Eltham House (as the palace was now
called), where he died on September 13th, 1646.
In 1650 the property was sold by Parliament
to Major-General Rich. According to the survey
taken in 1649, the buildings consisted of: —
** One fair chapel, one great hall, thirty-six rooms and offices
below stairs, with two large cellars ; and above stairs, in
lodgings called the King's side, 17, the Queen's side, 12, and
ROYAL ELTHAM. 163
the Prince's side, 9 ; in all 38 lodging-rooms, with other
necessary small rooms . . . thirty-five bays of build-
ings, containing [in two stories about 78 rooms, etc.] with one
inward court containing ^ an acre, and one garden called the
Arbor, lying South of the Mansion ; also one orchard."
All this was sold for ^2,753, the estimated
value of the materials. On April 22, 1656,
Evelyn "went to see his Majesty's house at
Eltham, both Palace and chapell in miserable
ruines, the noble woods and park destroy 'd by
Rich the Rebell."
The restoration of Charles II, did not bring
about the restoration of the palace. Sir John
Shaw, to whom the estate was granted by the
king, proceeded straightway to demolish the
buildings, which were really in such bad repair as
to be uninhabitable. Happily they were not all
destroyed ; the great hall, which somebody
happened to remark would make a good barn,
was spared for that purpose !
Such was the base use to which the noble
building was put for many years. At last, in
1828, after nearly two centuries of neglect, the
roof showed signs of giving way, and the hall
was only saved from demolition by order of the
Government, who expended ;^700 on its repair.
Smirke, the celebrated architect, superintended
t64 bygone KENT.
the operations. In 1859 a dwelling-house was
erected against the eastern end. The hall
itself, which had until then continued to be used
as a barn, was cleared out, and since then it has
been carefully preserved.
The moat, which varies in breadth from fifty to
one hundred feet, is still spanned on the north by
the three-arched bridge built by Edward IV.,
but, excepting the portion below the bridge, it is
now quite dry. Before crossing it, there is seen
on the right hand a picturesque wooden house,
which, if it be not the actual building, occupies the
site of "my Lord Chancellor's lodging," as shown
in a plan of 1509. Portions of the wall within
the moat are yet visible, and in the enclosure,
incorporated with the modern residence, are some
remains of the ancient kitchen and buttery.
There are also a number of subterranean
passages, now used as drains.
The hall, however, claims our chief attention.
It is built principally of bricks, faced with stone.
Its outward appearance is not remarkable ;
indeed, if it were not for the windows, it would
almost justify the misnomer of " King John's
Barn," which the people of Eltham for many
years applied to it. The architectural effect was
ROYAL ELTHAM. 165
intentionally restricted to the interior. On
entering, one is struck with its fine proportions,
the measurements being one hundred feet in length,
thirty-six in width, and fifty-five in height. The
body of the hall is lighted by ten windows on
each side, each window divided by a mullion
without a transom, and the sections cinquefoil-
headed with a quatrefoil between. These windows
only extend half-way down the walls, the space
below being left for tapestry. At the western
end, projecting north and south, are two large
bays, with windows reaching from top to bottom,
and finely vaulted roofs. Across the hall between
these bays was the dais, and at the opposite end
a carved screen reached from side to side, with an
inner entrance in its centre, forming a lobby into
which the outer doors opened. Above this was
the minstrels' gallery. But the finest feature of
the hall is its hammer-beam roof, constructed of
oak, with braces resting on stone corbels, carved
pendants, spandrels pierced with trefoils, and
pierced panelling above the collar-beams.
Standing within the Hall nowadays it is dilTficult
to realise its former magnificence. The dais is
levelled with the ground ; the music-gallery has
gone, and the present screen is but a patchwork ;
1 66 BYGONE KENT.
no rich hangings decorate the bare, rough walls ;
the windows, all unglazed, are sadly mutilated ;
and the roof, the best-preserved portion, is almost
hidden by the huge unsightly framework raised to
support it. Yet, while we deplore the damage
done to the building in the days of its degradation,
we must not forget that, but for its adaptability to
the purposes of a barn, it would have been totally
destroyed more than two hundred years ago.
(Brccuwicb Jfaii\
By Thomas Frost.
THE pleasure fairs of our towns and
villages are diminishing year by year, both
in number and attractiveness, under the combined
influences of legal enactments against them and
the facilities now enjoyed for a higher class of
entertainments than those which they provided.
At the rate at which they have of late years been
disappearing, the next generation will know them
only by the pictures of Hogarth, Rowlandson,
and Setchel, and the contemporary descriptions of
Hone and others.
The fairs of Kent which had survived the
changes of the last fifty or sixty years have been
swept away by magisterial edicts under the
powers conferred by the Fairs Act. It may be
well, therefore, to present a picture of one of the
most famous of them, while there are yet living
some few persons who can recall its chief features.
Let it be Greenwich.
There were really two pleasure fairs held at
1 68 BYGONE KENT.
Greenwich, at Easter and Whitsuntide respec-
tively, but for the purpose of this paper they may
be dealt with as one. The earlier fair was the
opening event of the year with the showmen, the
stall-keepers, and the proprietors of the drinking
and dancing booths. The portable theatre then
owned by Richardson, a notable character in
his way, always occupied a prominent position at
both fairs, and many actors who afterwards
became favourably known to the frequenters of
the London theatres acquired their early
experience on its boards. It is known that
Edmund Kean, James Wallack, Oxberry, and
Saville Faucit, were of the number, but it cannot
be said positively that those stars of the theatrical
world ever appeared under a canvas canopy at
Greenwich. There, however, were certainly
seen, in the palmy days of the fair, James Barnes,
afterwards famous as the pantaloon of the Covent
Garden pantomimes ; John Cartlitch, the original
representative of Mazeppa ; Nelson Lee, well
known to a later generation as the enterprising
manager of a metropolitan theatre, as well as
Richardson's successor; John Douglass, after-
wards lessee of the Standard, the largest
theatre in London ; Paul M erring, the
GREENWICH FAIR. 169
famous pantomimist ; Crowther, who was subse-
quently engaged at Astley's ; Charles Freer and
Mrs. Campbell, favourites later on at the
Pavilion ; and Mrs. Yates, who was afterwards
engaged at the Standard.
Some really good things were occasionally to be
seen on the boards of Richardson's theatre. For
instance, in the first year of Lee's management,
the ballet in " Esmeralda," which was then
attracting large audiences to the Adelphi, was
produced at the Whitsuntide fair at Greenwich,
where the theatre stood at the extreme end of
the ground, near the bridge at Deptford Creek.
It proved a great success, and Oscar Byrne, who
had arranged the ballet for the Adelphi, visited
the theatre, and complimented Lee on the
manner in which it was produced. The ballet
was probably much better worth seeing than the
sensational dramas, cut down to an extent that
enabled them to be played in twenty minutes,
upon which the popularity of Richardson's chiefly
depended.
Actors who have long since departed from the
stage of this world used to tell some singular
stories in connection with this well-known show.
Among these may be quoted the deception
I70 BYGONE KENT.
practised on Nelson Lee by an eccentric panto-
mimist named Shaw, who, in addition to oddities
of mind and manner, possessed but one eye.
Towards the close of the season of 184 1, this young
man's freaks became so remarkable as to raise a
doubt as to whether he was perfectly sane, and, in
the interests of the theatre, he received his dismissal.
When the company was being formed for the
following season, an application for the vacancy
was received by letter from one Charles Wilson,
who stated that he had been engaged as
Harlequin at the Theatre Royal, Birmingham.
Lee engaged him, but did not see him until he
presented himself at the theatre on Easter
Sunday, at Greenwich. There was then observed
a remarkable resemblance between the new
Harlequin and his predecessor, extending to
every feature except the eyes, and even they
were the same colour as Shaw's. It was soon
discovered, however, that the eye, which had
made a puzzle of the identity, was a glass one ;
and " Wilson," charged with being Shaw,
acknowledged the deception. Lee overlooked it,
and experience seems to have made the panto-
mimist a wiser man in the future.
Menageries and circuses enjoyed a large share
GREENWICH FAIR. 171
of the patronage of the visitors to the fair, and in
connection with one of the former — Wombwell 's
— the original Wombwell's, for George Wombwell
was then living — a terrible catastrophe occurred
there rather more than fifty years ago. The
attractiveness of performances with lions and
tigers by women had brought so much money into
the coffers of Hilton and Edmunds, that Helen
Blight, the daughter of a musician in Wombwell's
band, was induced to undertake the role of
"lion queen," in rivalry with Miss Hilton and
Miss Chapman (now Mrs. George Sanger).
Unfortunately, she had not sufficient command of
her temper for the successful exercise of so
dangerous a vocation. While performing with
the animals at Greenwich Fair, she applied a
riding-whip she was carrying to a tiger which
exhibited some refractoriness. The enraged
beast immediately sprang upon her, seized her by
the throat, and dragged her to the floor of the cage.
The keepers endeavoured to beat off the tiger,
but the unfortunate young woman was dead before
she could be rescued.
Hilton's menagerie passed into the possession
of Manders in 1852, and when the show came to
Greenwich that year, it was without a lion-
172 . BYGONE KENT.
performer, Tom Newsome — brother of the late
circus proprietor of that name — having just before
terminated his engagement in that capacity some-
what abruptly. On one of the fair days an
•athletic negro, in the garb of a sailor, accosted
one of the musicians, and asked whether employ-
ment could be found for him in the show.
M an ders was communicated with, and the negro
was invited to enter the show, and see the
"governor." His appearance led Manders to
offer him the vacant position of "lion-king,"
which he accepted with so much seeming
confidence in his power to control the animals,
that he was, at his own request, allowed to enter
the lion's cage, in which situation he displayed so
much coolness and address that he was engaged
there and then. This black sailor was the famous
Macomo, who travelled with the menagerie for
several years, realising to the uttermost the
expectations raised by his first performance with
the beasts.
After the shows of one kind and another, the
most prominent features of the fair were the
large booths devoted to refection and dancing.
There were sometimes a score of these in the fair,
the principal being the Crown and Anchor and
GREENWICH FAIR. 173
the Albion, the only two at which a charge was
made for admission to the "assembly room,"
the tickets being a shilling at the former, and
sixpence at the latter. The Crown and Anchor
was three hundred and twenty-three feet long by
sixty feet wide, seventy feet of the length
constituting the refreshment department, and the
rest of the space, rearward, being devoted to
dancing. The culinary operations were conducted
in open air, behind the booths, where glowing
charcoal fires burned in grates of immense width.
At night both the refreshment bar and the
dancing room were lighted with coloured lamps,
arranged in a variety of devices, as crowns, stars,
anchors, wreaths, etc., and in the latter com-
partment, separated by a partition, a good band
played, generally consisting of two harps, three
violins, a bass viol, two clarionets, and a flute.
In the palmy days of the fair the sons and
daughters of the shopkeepers of the district
resorted to the Crown and Anchor in the evening,
and joined in the quadrilles and country dances
without the slightest fear as to what Mrs. Grundy
might say. The company became less select,
however, in the latter years of the fair.
The fair did not, even in its best days, always
174 BYGONE KENT.
pass without some disturbance. Half a century
ago, when the respectable portion of society was
so frequently scandalized by the wild freaks of
certain scions of aristocratic families, a party of
these young men visited Richardson's theatre, and
annoyed both actors and audience by throwing
nuts at the former, and talking and laughing
loudly throughout the performance. A dozen
years later the show was wrecked by a party of
soldiers from Woolwich, the riot originating in a
practical joke played by one of the party upon a
man in the crowd. This being resented, the
soldier assaulted him, and on his retreating up the
steps he was followed by his assailant. Nelson
Lee interposed, and was himself assaulted, upon
which some of the company bundled the aggressor
down the steps. He returned, supported by a
number of his comrades, and a fight ensued on the
exterior stage. The defenders were over-matched,
however, and retreated into the auditorium or
jumped off the platform and fled. The soldiers
then began destroying the front of the theatre
and smashing the lamps. Fortunately these were
not lighted, or a terrible conflagration might have
been the result. Lee exerted himself bravely to
prevent the destruction of his property until a
GREEN WICH FAIR. 1 7 5
rope was fastened round him, with which the
rioters were about to hoist him to the top of the
front, when a dozen constables arrived and
rescued him from his dastardly assailants. The
latter fled, but several of them were captured,
and probably would have been dealt with as
severely as they deserved to be if Lee had not
withdrawn from the prosecution in the expectation
that compensation would be made by the officers
of the regiment, as the recorder had suggested,
but he never received a penny.
Richardson's — or rather Johnson and Lee's
— theatre appeared at this fair for the last time in
1852. Wombwell had died two years before,
his fine collection being then divided, in
conformity with his will, into three equal parts,
which he bequeathed to his widow and two
nieces, Mrs. Edmunds and Mrs. Day. The fair
had been declining for several years, though its
decadence was not perceptible to ordinary
observers, who saw no diminution of the crowds
before the principal shows and thronging the
avenues, and as many shows as had been seen in
earlier years. But the showmen and the keepers
of booths and stalls did not find their receipts at
all proportionate to the number of visitors. The
176 BYGONE KENT.
growth of population swelled the crowds, but the
middle classes no longer patronised the shows,
and it had become infra dig. to be seen in the
dancing booths. The railway and the steamboats
brought a larger number of visitors, but they were
chiefly of the class for whom the showmen found
reduced charges to be a necessity, without a
commensurate increase in the number of patrons.
The decadence of the fair proceeded more
rapidly during the last few years of its existence.
By the absence of Richardson's show it was shorn
of half its glory, and its abolition in 1857 left little
cause for regret. The proprietors of portable
theatres found it more to their advantage to
locate them for two or three months in a town
which was as yet without a permanent temple of
Thespis, than to set them up for three days in the
suburbs of London. The tenting circuses
followed their example, and the opening of the
Zoological Gardens to the public did much to
cause the travelling menageries to be comparatively
neglected. Greenwich Fair had, in short,
outlived the age for which it had provided a
welcome means of relaxation and amusement, and
its end did not come at all too soon.
Zbc fll^artl?re^ Carbinal.
By Frederick Ross, f.r.h.s.
IT was in an eventful period when John Fisher
was born at Beverley, Yorkshire. The first
part of the Wars of the Roses had just terminated ;
the battle of Wakefield had been fought, and
Queen Margaret had spiked the head of Richard,
Duke of York, over the gate of York; and Towton
fight, with its ocean of blood, had reversed the
former, and placed the young Duke of York,
Edward, on the throne of the Plantagenets ; the
land had been reft of many a noble name ; titles
had become extinct by the sword, the axe, and
attainder ; and in every great family of the realm
there was mourning and desolation.
The father of John Fisher was named Robert
Fisher, and was a wealthy mercer in Beverley, a
zealous upholder of the established faith, and a
determined opponent of the Wiclifian heresy,
who left by will 2od. to the Collegiate Church of
St. John, 2od. to each of the almshouses in the
town, 3s. 4d. to each of the friaries, 13s. 4.6.. to
N
i7» BYGONE KENT.
the chaplain of St. Trinity to pray for his soul,
6s. 8d. to Robert Kuke, Vicar of St. Mary's, and
other legacies. Agnes, his mother, was a most
devout woman, and it was at her knees that he
imbibed his religious sentiments and depth of
devotional feeling. Robert Fisher died in 1477,
leaving his widow with John and three younger
sons to educate and bring up ; she afterwards
married a man of the name of Wright, to whom
she bore issue three sons and a daughter, named
Elizabeth, who afterwards became a nun at Dart-
ford, in Kent, for whose edification her half-
brother wrote two treatises on religion when in
the Tower. In 1483, John was sent to Cam-
bridge, where he graduated B.A. 1487, and M.A.
1491 ; was chosen F"ellow of his college and
Proctor in 1494 ; made D.D. and Vice-Chancellor
1 50 1 ; Lady Margaret Professor of Divinity
1502; Chancellor of the University 1504; Head
of Queen's College 1505; and Master of Christ
Church College 1506.
Whilst the young student was passing through
the successive steps of his collegiate career, other
important events of historic interest were taking
place. King Edward the Fourth had passed
away, leaving his crown to his youthful son,
THE MARTYRED CARDINAL. 179
Edward the Fifth, who, with his brother, the
Duke of York, was murdered by their uncle, the
Duke of Gloucester. Then followed the short
nightmare reign of Richard the Third, which
terminated at his death on Bosworth Field, when
his corpse was thrown across a horse and carried
away for burial, whilst his crown, which was
found in a bush, was placed on the head of
Henry, Duke of Richmond, the first of the
Tudors. The new King established his court at
Greenwich, placing at the head of his household
his mother, Margaret, daughter and heiress of
John, Duke of Somerset, great-grand-daughter
of John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster, and relict
of Edmund Tudor, who had been created Duke
of Richmond by his half-brother, King Henry VI.
He was thus the representative of the Red Rose,
and, from motives of policy, soon after his
accession he married Elizabeth, daughter of
Edward IV., representative of the White Rose,
and so, in the person of their son, Henry VIII.,
united the Roses, and put a final end to the
disastrous contentions amongst the descendants
of Edward HI., which had been caused by the
usurpation of Henry IV.
Margaret, now Countess Dowager of Richmond,
i8o BYGONE KENT.
was a most amiable, pious, and devout lady,
spending her days and nights in prayer, and
hearing mass, in fasting, maceration of her flesh,
and in charitable deeds, spending her wealth in
works of philanthropy, and promoting the spread
of education. She spent her life, according to
the light of her age, in self-abnegation and the
performance of her duty to God ; and if ever
woman deserved canonisation, that woman was
Margaret Beaufort, Countess of Richmond. It
chanced that when Fisher was Proctor, he was
sent on business of the University to the Court of
Greenwich, where he obtained an introduction to
Countess Margaret, who was struck by his
edifying conversation, his unassuming manners,
and his piety, and in consequence constituted
him her confessor and spiritual adviser, and
subsequently her chief, indeed sole, director in
matters secular as well as spiritual. Under his
advice, she founded at Cambridge, in 1503, a
Divinity Lecture, and the following year a
preachership for six sermons to be preached
yearly in London, Lincoln, and Ely. Many
other objects of charitable, educational, and
religious character were also carried out by her,
at his suggestion, by far the most important beings
THE MARTYRED CARDINAL. i8i
the foundation of Christ's College, Cambridge, in
1506, and of St. John's College, the latter having
been erected under the direction of Fisher, after
her death, and opened in 15 16. She died in
1509, and Fisher preached her funeral sermon,
with a panegyric on her character.
In 1503 the see of Rochester fell vacant, and
King Henry thought of Fisher for the office, but
did not think proper to appoint him without his
mother's consent. He therefore wrote to her : —
" I am well myndit to promote Master Fisher,
youre Confessoor, to a bishopric, and I assure
you, madam, for non other cause, but for the grete
and singular vertue that I know and se in hym,
as well as in conyn and wisdome, and specially
for his good and vertuose ly ving and conversation.
And bye the promotion of suche a man, I know
well it should corage many others to lyve
vertuously, and to take soche wages as he dothe,
which shoulde be a good exampl to many others,"
etc. Of course Lady Margaret assented, and he
was advanced to the episcopal bench, the
appointment being ratified by the Pope, July 2nd,
1504. He was highly esteemed by the King,
who appointed him tutor to his sons, Arthur and
Henry ; and when the latter came to the throne
1 82 BYGONE KENT.
as Henry VIII., Fisher became his friend and
counsellor in all matters relating to religion and
the Church.
When Henry was young, he was a good
Catholic and hater of heresy, whether Wiclifite
or Lutheran, looking up to the Pope as his
spiritual superior and the Vicegerent of Christen-
dom ; and so he remained until he became
enamoured of the fair Anne Boleyn, when, as is
well known, because the Church threw obstacles
in his way of getting rid of his wife Katherine, a
pious daughter of the Church, his affections
became alienated from the Pope, and, by gradual
steps, he threw off the Papal yoke, plundered the
Church of its wealth, and assumed for himself the
headship of the Church of England. It was in
the interval that, in his ardent zeal for theological
distinction, he produced a book, which he pro-
fessed to have written, against Luther, entitled
" Assertio Septem Sacramentorum Adversus
Martyn Luther." The manuscript was sent to
Rome, and circulated among the cardinals and
bishops, causing considerable sensation by its
learning and ability, and was deposited in the
Library of the Vatican as one of its chief
treasures. The Pope granted plenary indulgence
THE MARTYRED CARDINAL.
183
to all who should read it, and a Collepfe of
Cardinals was called to consider what title should
be accorded to the Royal writer for so signal a
service to the Church. The Apostolic ; the
Orthodox ; the Faithful ; the Angelic ; and others
JOHN FISHER.
{From the portrait by Holbein.)
were suggested, and finally that of " Defender of
the Faith " was adopted. It is tolerably certain
that Henry was not the author of the book ; he
may have suggested it and laid down the outlines
of the arguments, but he had neither intellectual
capacity nor sufficient learning to have written it ;
1 84 BYGONE KENT.
and it has been conjectured, from internal
evidence and other circumstances, that the real
author was Fisher, and this most probably is the
truth, as he was one of the few who were capable
of writing it, and it would be naturally to him —
his quondam tutor and spiritual adviser — that the
King would turn for assistance in the production
of the book.
In his writings and sermons, Fisher ever up-
held, as an indubitable truth, the supremacy of the
Pope above all earthly potentates, and declaimed
vehemently" against the Lutheran and all other
heresies as the spawn of hell ; and it was his bold
and conscientious adherence to these principles
that alienated him from his master, and caused
his overthrow and death. The first breach
occurred on the divorce question, he telling the
King, when asked his opinion on the marriage, that
" there could be no doubt of its validity, since it
was good and lawful from the beginning, and
could not be dissolved without sin," and he
appeared before the Legates Campeggio and
Wolsey, to plead for the Queen, which he did
with great boldness and eloquence.
He still further displeased the King in 1529, by
vigorously denouncing in Parliament the Act for
THE MARTYRED CARDINAL. 185
the dissolution of the lesser monasteries as an act
of sacrilege, and consummated his offence by-
protesting, in outspoken plainness, in Convoca-
tion, against the assumption of the Headship of
the Church by the King. He now began to be
looked upon as a troublesome character, whom it
would be well to be rid of; and in 1530, one
Rouse gained admittance to his kitchen, and put
poison in the food then being prepared. For-
tunately, the Bishop was ill, and unable to eat,
but of seventeen persons who partook of the
food two died, and the rest never wholly recovered
their health. The crime was brought home to
Rouse, and he was boiled to death in Smithfield.
The sought-for opportunity of criminating
Fisher was not long in forthcoming. He listened
to the utterances and gave some credence to the
visions of "The Holy Maid of Kent," and was
indicted for misprision of treason, tried, and
condemned to imprisonment during the King's
pleasure, but obtained his release on payment of
a fine of ^300.
In 1534, the Act of Succession was passed,
enjoining an oath of submission to the King and
his heirs begotten of " his most dear and entirely-
beloved Queen Anne," and making it high
1 86 BYGONE KENT.
treason to speak against his marriage with her.
Fisher was called upon to take this oath, and on
refusal to do so without some modification of it,
was cast into the Tower, but was liberated on
promising allegiance to the King and his heirs
by his new marriage, declaring, however,
that "his conscience could not be convinced that
the marriage was not opposed to the laws of
God." The King was now determined, at once
and for ever, to get rid of so pestilent a subject,
and issued a commission to try hirri for high
treason, specially for his denial of the King's
supremacy over the Church. Solicitor-General
Rich deposed that the prisoner had said to him,
" I believe in my conscience, and assuredly
know by my learning, that the King neither is
nor can be head of the Church of England,"
admitting, however, that this was said to him
privately and confidentially, when he went to him
from the King, who wished his candid opinion on
the question, and assuring him that whatever he
might say should not be made use of to his
detriment. The aged bishop, then "]"] years of
age, defended himself with great dignity and
ability, but a packed jury found him guilty, and he
was condemned to death.
THE MARTYRED CARDINAL. 187
He was sent back to the Tower, where,
notwithstanding his venerable age, he was treated
with the greatest indignities, and subjected to
great privation and suffering. In a letter to
Cromwell, still extant, he writes — '* I beseech you
to be good, master, in my necessity ; for I have
E.MHLEMATIC DEVICE.
(Front tlie English version \lS(xi\ of Fishers treatise on the " Need of Prayer." )
neither shirt nor other clothes that are necessary
for me to wear, but that be ragged and rent
shamefully. Notwithstanding, I might suffer that
if they would but keep me warm. But my diet,
also, God knoweth how slender it is. And now, in
mine age, my stomach may not away but with a few
kinds of meat, which, if I want, I decay forthwith."
1 88 BYGONE KENT.
On the morning of his execution he was
awakened at five o'clock, and, when told -the time,
turned over, saying, "Then I can have two hours
more sleep, as I am not to die until nine." At
seven he rose and dressed himself in his best
apparel, observing that "this was his wedding
day, when he was to be married to death, and it
was fitting to appear in becoming attire." He
met his fate with the greatest firmness and
composure, and when his head was stricken off,
the executioner stripped the body, and it was left
naked on the scaffold until the evening, when it
was taken by the guard to All Hallows' Church-
yard, and buried in a grave dug with their
halberds, but was afterwards exhumed and buried in
the Chapel of St. Peter ad Vincula, in the Tower.
The head was placed over London Bridge for
fourteen days, "the features," says Hall, "becom-
ing fresher and more comely every day." Thus
died this good and famous Kentish bishop.
When the news reached Rome, the King,
whom it had been proposed to style " the angelic,"
was stigmatised as a foul miscreant and diabolical
murderer, and branded as "the Nero, the Domitian,
the Caligula of England." A short time before
his execution, the Pope sent Fisher a cardinal's
THE MARTYRED CARDINAL. 189
hat, upon which the King made a brutal jest,
saying, " 'Fore heaven, he shall wear it on his
shoulders then, for by the time it arrives he shall
not have a head to place it upon."
His portrait, by Holbein, is in St. John's
College, and another is in the English Bene-
dictine Monastery at Paris, and his bust was one
of the eight on the Holbein Gate, at West-
minster.
He was a very voluminous writer of devotional
and polemical works, and his life has been
frequently written, from different points of
view.
Zbc Ikentisb dialects, anb pegae an^
*3Lewi0, tbe ol^ County (Bloesariste.
By R. Stead, b.a., f.r.h.s.
TWO friends are rather inclined to find fa,ult
with the writer for including in a volume
on " Bygone Kent" a short paper on the dialects
of the county. One sees no connection between
"bad English "and things " bygone," whilst the
other finds nothing worthy of special notice in the
folk-speech of Kent, he supposes "they talk
English in Kent, just as they do all over the
country." Now these two persons well represent
two great classes in their attitude towards
provincial dialects. Large numbers of people —
even of the so-called educated classes — regard
these dialects as simply ''bad English^' and so
not worth troubling one's head about. What
they say is in effect this : — the sooner railways
and Board Schools knock all that sort of thing out
of existence the better. On the other hand the
uneducated or half educated, who have never been
much out of their own district, are unable to see
THE KENTISH DIALECTS. 191
any great difference between their own dialect and
ordinary received English. They suppose that all
their own peculiarities of grammar, vocabulary,
and pronunciation obtain as a matter of course all
over the country. An amusing instance of this
was furnished in Kent itself some three or four
years ago. The Kent Glossary, by Messrs. Parish
and Shaw, then just issued by the English
Dialect Society, received a long notice in the
columns of one of the leading Kentish weeklies.
The writer expressed his unbounded astonishment
that some of the commonest words in his own
vocabulary should be set down as mere provincial
words, and not ordinary English — that they are in
fact totally unknown to millions of Englishmen.
He ended by saying that if all this turned out to
be correct I — he was evidently more than a little
doubtful about the correctness of Messrs. Parish
and Shaw's statements — it would be news, and
amazing news, to most people. Like Monsieur
Jourdain with his prose, this young man had been
talking a dialect all his life without knowing it.
Now nothing is more certain than that
provincial English is for the most part not bad
English but old English. Local dialects are, in
fact, as compared with the received or literary
192 BYGONE KENT.
tongue, in the position of poor (and despised)
relations. Under circumstances that need not be
dwelt upon here, one of the many provincial forms
of speech became the court or " standard " English.
The favoured dialect was that of the South
Midlands (though at one time it looked as if that
of the North would come to the fore). Of course
the court dialects soon came to be regarded as
the only "good" English, and fine folks began to
look down upon the poor sister dialects — dialects
every whit as good as that of the South Midlands
— which soon found themselves stigmatised as
"bad" English. As Tennyson's "Northern
Farmer" says, "the poor in a loomp is bad," and
naturally the English of the poor is set down "in
a loomp " as bad English. Amongst these poor
unfavoured dialects which did not become court
English, was the dialect of Kent — for there is a
dialect of Kent, notwithstanding the incredulity of
the young newspaper-man just alluded to, and it is
as well worth studying as its sister dialects.
Unluckily but little attention has been given to
the Kentish folk-speech until very lately. For
years there was an ominous blank after the name
of Kent in the English Dialect Society's annual
lists of what was being done in the way of dialect
THE KENTISH DIALECTS. 193
investigation in the different counties. Whereas
in many districts workers galore were to be found,
in Kent there was apparently not a single one
who thought it worth his while to investigate the
old Kentish folk-speech. Fortunately this re-
proach has now been removed, as will be explained
further on.
The famous mediaeval poem entitled th e
" Ayenbite of Inwyt " (or "Remorse of
Conscience)," by Dan Michel of Northgate, in
Kent, is written in the Kent dialect. From that
time till 1674 nobody seems to have much regarded
the county speech, but in that year Ray, the
famous naturalist and collector of local words,
included a good many Kentish words in his
" South and East Country" collection. In 1736,
appeared the first genuine Kentish glossarist.
This was the Rev. John Lewis, who gave to the
world a short glossary of words used in the Isle of
Thanet. This glossary formed part of his work
" History and Antiquities, as well Ecclesiastical as
Civil, of the Isle of Tenet, in Kent." In the
same year the famous Samuel Pegge, a native
of Derbyshire, but long vicar of Godmersham, in
Kent, published his well-known "Alphabet of
Kenticisms." He included in his list almost all
O
194 BYGONE KENT.
the words previously given by Lewis, and added
to them some hundreds more. Both collections
have been within the last few years re-issued by
the English Dialect Society. And under the
auspices of the same Society has lately appeared
a far more important work, '' A dictionary of the
Kentish Dialect," by the Rev. W. D. Parish and
the Rev. VV. Frank Shaw, alluded to above. A
copy of this, now the " Authority " on the subject,
together with copies of Pegge, Lewis, Ray, and
the " Ayenbite of Inwyt," ought to be in every
public library in the county.
Before noting its peculiarities it may be well
to show how the Kentish dialect is related to the
rest of the English provincial dialects. Leaving
out the Lowland Scotch district, the English
dialects of this island may be all grouped under
one or other of three great divisions, which may
be called respectively the Northern, the Midland,
and the Southern. These three leading forms
have obtained from very early times. A line
drawn obliquely across England from Morecambe
Bay to just below the H umber may be taken as
roughly separating the Northern dialects from the
Midland varieties ; whilst a very irregular
boundary line between the Midland and the
THE KENTISH DIALECTS. 195
Southern forms of speech runs from a little below
the Wash to near Bristol. Each of these three
great divisions has certain well-marked peculiari-
ties of pronunciation. The late learned Dr. A. G.
Ellis, whom the present writer was privileged to
know, and to assist to some extent, devoted many-
years to the investigation of the different forms of
provincial pronunciation. Those who wish to
see what he did, should consult his truly marv^ell-
ous work on Early English Pronunciation (Early
English Text Society), especially his Part V.
On this whole subject, Dr. Ellis was far and away
the greatest authority. As test words by which the
great divisions of dialect (whatever their varieties)
may always be distinguished, he took the words
"some house." In the Northern dialects these
words are always " soom hoose," in the Midland
forms they appear as " soom house," and in the
South as "sum house." Kent, of course, belongs
to the "sum house " district.
Coming now to the good old county itself, the
labours of Dr. Ellis went to show that though tl^
folk-speech is fairly uniform over the whole of
Kent, yet two distinct varieties may be observed,
viz., the North Kent and the East Kent varieties.
There might even be said to be a third form, for
196 BYGONE KENT.
a small portion near the western boundary of the
county resembles East Sussex in its dialect. The
line dividing the north Kent from the East Kent
forms is not very clearly ascertained, but it would
seem to be roughly a line drawn from about
Staplehurst through Canterbury round to
Sandwich, with a little fringe round the coast,
perhaps as far as Hythe, to include the boating
and fishing population, whose dialect seems to
agree in some respects with that of North Kent
rather than with that of East Kent.
Taking the county as a whole, the pronunciation
is marked by many peculiarities, a few of the
more important of which may be given.
1. The use of d for the initial th ; this, that,
there, etc., becoming dis, dat, dere ; th in the
middle of a word is not always so sounded,
though furder and farden (farthing) are
common enough.
2. The use of a for the short ^ in a vast
number of words : — tap (top), spat (spot),
packet (pocket). With many speakers the 0
becomes even aa, or ah, and it is quite a
common thing to hear such a sentence as
putt it ahn tahp (put it on the top). This is a
very striking peculiarity of the Kentish speech, ,
THE KENTISH DIALECTS. ■ 197
3. The pronunciation of the long a (as in slate),
and the diphthong ai (or ay). Day, plate, rain,
become dye, plyte, ryne. This is ahnost
universal in North Kent, but much less so in
the eastern portion of the county, where with
many speakers it is almost unnoticeable.
This pronunciation of a, is of course well
known in the cockney dialect.
4. On the other hand the peculiar sound of 00,
or u long, which is almost universal in East
Kent, is hardly so common in North Kent.
Two becomes tiw, food, Jiwd, or better still,
perhaps, fiid, where the ic resembles pretty
closely the German il. Sometimes it even
approaches ee, as soo7t is not very different
from the ordinary English seen.
5. Long i becomes oi, as moine (mine), voilet
(violet).
6. Ul often becomes ol, as solphur (sulphur),
moltitude, or even maultihide.
7. What Dr. Ellis calls the "final reverted
/" is universal in Kent. Large numbers
even of fairly educated people use it, though
they would be indignant if told they were
to that extent using provincial forms of
pronunciation. This reverted / practically
198 BYGONE KENT.
makes the letter into two syllables : thus bill
becomes bee-ul, or bi/il, mail becomes
may-ul {or mek'l,) steel, stee-ul, and so forth.
8. One of the best known characteristics is the
use of w for v — Nowember, wacancy, willage,
wisit, wittles.
But some doubt seems to have been expressed
by those whom Dr. Ellis consulted as to whether
the contrary use of v for w obtained in Kent. It
is, however, quite certain that this usage, though
rapidly becoming obsolete, is still to be met
with here and there. An old man living near
Westenhanger said to the present writer with a
hearty laugh, " I have a cousin comes here
sometimes and amuses us all. He calls this place
Vestenhanger. He lives in the 'veskit' district
you know," he added, by way of explanation. It
turned out that this cousin came from near
Wingham. (The worthy old fellow who was so
much amused with his relative's Vestenhanger
saw nothing funny in his own wery, weal [veal],
and ivinegar.) It is worth noting, too, that even
in his own district people speak of Postling Vents,
instead of Wents, or roads. And the writer has
heard a Folkestone fisherman call a friend Vellard
(Wellard). But this cockneyism — as it may be
THE KENTISH DIALECTS. 199
called — everyone will recall Dickens' " Samivel
Veller " — is rapidly dropping out of use in most
parts of the county. Before leaving the
pronunciation — and we have indicated but a very
few of its peculiarities — two general characteristics
may be pointed out. First the vowel sounds are
almost without exception remarkably impitre, or
rather, undecided. The i in milk, for instance, is
a sort of cross between the short e and the short
u, ^nelk or vmlk. Past is neither clearly pahst
nor past, but a peculiar half-way, so to speak,
between the two, paest, which must be heard to
be appreciated. The a for 0, oi for /, it for 00,
and so forth have been already noted. The
second great characteristic of the 'Kentish
provincial pronunciation is a very remarkable
clipping out or jumbling together of syllables,
which renders the dialect at first very puzzling to
a stranger.
It rarely happens that three or four consecutive
words, are uttered complete; some one or more
portions are sure to be left out: " Ae paes tiw "
does duty for ''half-past two," '^ goozbriz'' for
gooseberries, " Satdy " (or Setdy) for Saturday,
"Eshf" (or "Eshfd") for Ashford, "bar" for
barrow. At the railway stations " morn-peyp "
200 BYGONE KENT.
stands for morning paper, "scursh," with a
very faint soupgon of an n at the end, passes
for excursion. Such a rapid jumble as
" moillgooberrneez " (!) for " mine will go better
than his," may be constantly heard from the
street boys. The effect of all this is very striking,
and teachers know the difficulty there is sometimes
in getting children to read without slurring over
or dropping two-thirds of the syllables. Thus
the sentence "A collision between ourselves and
the natives now seemed inevitable," will sometimes
be read something like this, " clizh-twee-seln-nate-
now-see-nevl," with a faint "filling in," so to
speak, between these strongly marked syllables.
Of the grammar little need be said here, but
a few curious turns of expression may be noted.
Double negatives are extremely common, and
such phrases as " no more you don't," " no more
I didn't," are everywhere heard. Then we get
"you didn't ought to," for "you ought not," "he
don't dare," for " he dare not," and so forth.
"The next to the last," for "the last but one,"
is one of the commonest of phrases. As plurals
we get nestles (nests), pastes or posties (posts), etc.,
to any extent. Baint (or beent), for "is not"
still survives here and there, though it is evidently
THE KENTISH DIALECTS. 201
dying out. To after help is omitted, — " She wont
help carry the basket." "Directly minute" for
"immediately" is a curious phrase which may be
heard used even by well-educated people of the
upper middle class. " Deleft " is the past
participle of believe. Then people " keep all
on " doing things, and boys may be heard
constantly using, " No, you never," " No, I never,"
and so on, for "No, you did not," "No, I did
not."
The rustic Kentishman has a fairly copious
vocabulary, and some of the words he uses are
very curious ones. A very familiar word is
" flead," which Pegge defines as "lard, or rather
the leaf of fat whence lard is got." To a native
of the county it seems incredible that there should
be millions of folk in England who never heard of
either *' flead " or " flead cakes." "Lodge"
means a wood or toolshed, just about the last
place where one would like to lodge. Oast or
oast-house is so common a feature of the Kentish
hop districts that the inhabitants look upon the
word as inseparably connected with hops. Yet
oast was used in Kent for a kiln long before hop
culture was introduced. There were "brick-
oasts," or " brickhosts," "lymostes" (lime-oasts),
202 BYGONE KENT.
and probably other species as well. A very short
and handy word is "lew," which is much better
than the ordinary English "sheltered." " It lays
lew," it lies in a sheltered position. Culverkeys,
colverkeys, or cauverkeys is Kentish for cowslips,
though a native of Charing called these flowers
" horsebuckles." The word shires, pronounced
skeeres, is used in a vague way to denote any part
of England more than a county or two away.
" He comes from the sheeres," or "he's gone to
live somewhere in the sheeres," seems delightfully
vague in a country possessing forty shires, but it
seems to satisfy the good folks of rural Kent.
A very extraordinary expression is "to make
old bones," for to live to old age. To make bones
at all seems a difficult matter, but to make old
bones seems a truly puzzling feat. Yet the
phrase is found all over Kent and some of the
neighbouring counties. " Kentish fire," for long
and hearty cheering, is so well known that it need
not be dwelt upon. Effet for newt, crock, a large
earthenware pan or dish, may bug for cockchafer,
cater, for aslant or askew, with scores of others
are good Kentish words. Nailbourne or eyle-
bourne, deserves a passing word. It signifies an
intermittent brook, of which many exist in the
THE KENTISH DIALECTS. 203
county. Similar springs are met with in or near
the Yorkshire Wolds, and are there called gipseys
[g hard, as in go). Lathe for a division of the
county, and Miniiis, a common [e.g., Stelling
Minnis) seem peculiar to this part of England,
A teg (or tag) is a sheep of a year old ; a hurdle
is called a wattle. Ainpery, mouldy, decayed,
and tetter, cross, peevish, are very common.
Terrible, often pronounced ter'bl, is almost
invariably the word used to intensify the meaning.
"He's ter'bl bad," " dat aint ter'bl loikly,"
" dere's a ter'bl many rabbits 'bout here."
" There's no bounds to him," means " there's no
saying what he may do."
One might go on culling these interesting
words and phrases from the Kentish glossaries to
almost any extent. Dip where you will into
them, and you can hardly fail to light upon some
racy old word or form of speech which " bygone "
Kentishmen used, but which, alas ! is now either
wholly obsolete, or on the way to becoming so.
How many nowadays, especially of town-dwellers,
would understand such a sentence as this given
by Lewis : — " I took up the libbit that lay by the
sole, and hove it at the hagister that was in the
poddergrotten ?" I took up the stick that was
204 BYGONE KENT.
lying by the pond, and threw it at the magpie
that was in the pease-stubble. Yet libbet, soaL
hagister, podder (peas, beans, etc.) grotten or
gratten (stubble) were formerly good Kentish
words, if they are now all but forgotten in many
parts of the country.
A glance at some of the old Kentish proverbs
or proverbial sayings given by Pegge must
conclude this imperfect paper : —
" A knight of Cales,
A gentleman of Wales,
And a Laird of the North Countree ;
A yeoman of Kent
With his yearly Rent,
Will buy 'em out all three."
This is one of the best known of these proverbial
sayings. Learned men have disputed as to the
origin of the curious phrase " Neither in Kent nor
Christendom." Dover figures in a good many of
these old sayings. " Dover a den of thieves," is
as uncomplimentary to that town as
" When it's dark in Dover
It's dark all the world over,"
is the reverse. " As sure as there's a dog in
Dover " is at any rate rnore picturesque than the
common "as sure as a gun." "From Barwick
(Berwick) to Dover" is equivalent to saying
THE KENTISH DIALECTS. 205
" from one end of the land to the other." Further
uncomplimentary references to towns are found
in such sayings as
" I-'Ong, lazy, lousy Lewisham."
" He that will not live long,
Let him dwell at Muston, Tenham, or Tong."
*' Folkstone — Kent Fools " is an anagram.
" He that rideth into the Hundred of Hoo,
Besides pilfering Seamen, shall find Dirt enow."
" Deal Savages, Canterbury Parrots,
Dover Sharps, and Sandwich "Carrots."
" Naughty Ashford, surly Wye,
Poor Kennington hard by."
^be lkinQ'6 School, Canterbury.
By the Rev. J. S. Sidebotham, m.a.
INHERE is no question that this old school
(a school which has the Differentia among
cathedral schools of being known by initials, for
" K. S. C." are sufficient to identify it) has of late
years attained a position, if different in degree, at
least no less distinguished, than at that period
which is said to have been one of the times of its
greatest prosperity, viz., during the head-mastership
of the Rev. Osmund Beauvoir, d.d., from 1750 to
1782.
In the very incomplete "Memorials" of the
school which I compiled and published in 1865, I
cannot consider that I recovered more than a
very fragmentary account of a foundation which
has contributed quite an average quota pro rata
to the list of England's men of learning and
distinction.
John Johnson, the well-known author of "The
Unbloody Sacrifice" (17 14), mentioned in his
King's School Sermon, in 17 16, four men of
THE KINGS SCHOOL, CANTERBURY. 207
eminence as having received their education at
the school, viz., Bishop White of Peterborough,
Bishop Gunning of Ely, William Somner, the
antiquary, and Dean Spencer of Ely. There
was no question as to the three last named, but I
could nowhere trace the connection of Bishop
White with the school. I abstained from saying
in the "Memorials" that the then auditor, Mr.
Finch, declined to allow me to see the cathedral
records (although Dean Alford, with his ready
courtesy, had given me full permission to consult
them) " without the usual office fees," which
would of course have added seriously to the cost
of publication. " Besides," added the auditor, " I
do not know what use might be made of the
information." As if any use of such facts would be
prejudicial to anybody's interests ! This refusal is
the principal cause of the incompleteness of the
work. A search in the records of Canterbury
Cathedral would most likely bring to light at least
a few eminent names, as connected with the school,
in addition to those which are now known. I was
enabled, however, to recover some names of men
of learning and ability prior to the date of the
existing school register (the earliest known,
begun by Dr. Beauvoir on his appointment as
2o8 BYGONE KENT.
head-master in 1750), from Masters' " History of
Corpus Christ! College, Cambridge ;" Hasted's
" History of Kent ;" Nicholls' " Literary
Anecdotes ; " and from various manuscript
collections in the Bodleian and British Museum
Libraries.
When I consulted the former head-master, to
whom I shall always feel that I, in common with
many others, owe so much, the late Rev. George
Wallace, duringthe compilation of the "Memorials,"
he gave me, with his usual ready kindness, much
valuable assistance and information, partly from
notes which he had made, partly from his own early
experiences and recollections. He added, with
his characteristic love for the past : " Remember,
I shall not be satisfied unless you trace back the
origin of the school to Theodore of Tarsus."
As will be seen on a reference to page 7 of the
work, an attempt was made to give effect to his
wish. And there can be little reasonable doubt
that, although the existing King's School is well-
known to owe its origin to Henry VHL, who
founded it soon after he had dissolved the
monastery of St. Augustine, a school has existed
continuously in connection with Canterbury
Cathedral from the time of Archbishop Theodore.
THE KINGS SCHOOL, CANTERBURY. 209
The name of "The King's School" was, however,
first given to it by Henry VI 1 1., in 1542, who then
re-modelled the entire Cathedral establishment, as
he re-modelled all but eleven of the Cathedrals of
England and Wales, those, the constitution of
which remained unchanged, being St. Paul's in
London, Wells, Chichester, Exeter, Hereford,
Lichfield, Lincoln, St. Asaph, St. David's, and
Sarum in the South ; and York, the one instance
in the Northern province. These are still known
as " The Cathedrals of the Old Foundation ;" the
remaining establishments, which were remodelled
more or less on the principle adopted at Canter-
bury, being known as "The Cathedrals of the New
Foundation." The statutes then given to Canter-
bury Cathedral, and afterwards "corrected, ex-
plained, and confirmed " in the reign of Charles I.,
will be found in the second volume of the works
of Archbishop Laud, in the " Anglo-Catholic
Library." The original foundation staff of a head
and second masters and fifty scholars remains, but
the common table was discontinued as early as
1 546 ; and the school underwent other changes
about that time.
The idea of the " Memorials " occurred
simultaneously, and almost accidentally, to Bishop
P
2IO BYGONE KENT.
Mitchinson and myself. I happened to be in
Canterbury on the day he entered upon his duties
as head-master, and met him coming down the
Norman staircase after his first morning's school.
At the same moment the idea struck us both, that,
so far as we knew, no one had ever attempted to
recover any history of the school, and that yet
there must be a history. "Why," said he,
"should not you write it?" He then and there
invited me to visit him for a few days, during
which time I collected all that I could collect
from the documents he was then able to place
before me. Much kind assistance was also
received from many known and unknown to me ;
but it is to the knowledge and recollections of the
late Rev. George Gilbert, Prebendary of Lincoln,
and Vicar of Syston, that the most valuable
information of all is due.
In my own time, 1843 to 1848, not so much
as the name was known of any head-master
earlier than Mr. Naylor. The names of the later
head-masters are as follow : —
1750. Rev. Osmund Beauvoir, d.d.
1782. Rev. Christopher Naylor, m.a.
1 8 16. Rev. John Birt, d.d.
1833. Rev. George Wallace, m.a.
THE KINGS SCHOOL, CANTERBURY. 211
1859. Rev. John Mitchinson, d.c.l.
1873. Rev. George John Blore, d.d.
1886. Rev. Thomas Field, m.a.
Dr. Beauvoir and Mr. Naylor had been King's
Scholars, but, till the election of Mr. Field to the
head-mastership in 1886, no old King's Scholar
had been so elected for 104 years. I believe Dr.
Mitchinson was always desirous that an old
King's Scholar should succeed to the head-
mastership, and he has lived to see his wish
realised. Mr. Talbot, head-master from 1745 to
1750, had a future Lord Chancellor (Lord
Thurlow) under his care ; Dr. Beauvoir had the
early education of Lord Chief Justice Tenterden.
It is in Dr. Beauvoir's time that the school was
said to have reached the most prosperous
condition it had then known, and it was at that
time the resort of many boys of old county
families. But although that connection ceased
about a century ago, the reputation of the school
for sound scholarship has certainly increased very
considerably since that time, and successive
masters — especially In the last half century — have
each in his turn rendered essential services to the
school. At the death of Mr. Naylor at an
advanced age, in 1816, the number of boys in the
212 BYGONE KENT.
school had fallen to twenty-six. Under Dr.
Birt, his successor, the number rose rapidly, but
he also left but a small number of boys on his
presentation to the Vicarage of Faversham and
election to the head-mastership of Faversham
School, in 1833. Mr. Wallace, a master of much
energy, ability, and tact, raised the school again
to a number exceeding a hundred. Twenty-six
years of steady and conscientious work told on him,
and through him on the school ; though, on his
presentation to the Rectory of Burghclere, in
Hampshire, by the Earl of Carnarvon, in 1859,
the number had not fallen to anything like the
extent of former reductions. To him the school
owes its present Schoolroom, which replaced the
old and effete building, where, however, many
sound scholars had been educated. But the old
building was rightly condemned on sanitary
grounds, and these alone, though there were
many others would have amply sufficed. Indeed
had Mr. Wallace done no more than this, the
thanks of all interested in the King's School
would be due to him for this most essential
service.
In some points he thoroughly understood the
character of boys, in others less clearly. For
THE KINGS SCHOOL, CANTERBURY. 213
instance, he always inveighed against '* paper-
chases," but never succeeded in thoroughly
putting them down. When I had been a short
time living in Canterbury, as rector of St.
Mildred's (1869-77), ^ asked his successor, Dr.
Mitchinson, how it was that " paper-chases," to
which Wallace had always been so strongly
opposed, were now not only permitted, but
thoroughly recognised. He replied that, finding
no prohibitions or even penalties could stop them,
the only remedy was to legalise them, and place
them under proper conditions. But Wallace had
certainly gauged boy-character in other ways
with no little accuracy. On going back to
Canterbury to reside after an absence of just
twenty years, I found as Parish Churchwarden a
plumber and glazier who had married the
daughter and had been the foreman of the
glazier who did all the school work in my time.
He told me that Wallace had said to him, " Cole,
never wait for an order when you see a broken
pane of glass, but mend it at once, because when
boys see one broken pane, there's an immediate
temptation to break another." Dr. Butler, of
Shrewsbury, once gave as the differentia of a boy
that he was " a pelting animal," and he was not
214 BYGONE KENT.
far wrong. Wallace always made an enquiry
into broken windows, but he had the discernment
to do all he could to prevent gratuitous breakages.
Dr. Mitchinson, who succeeded him, sound
Churchman as he is, is not a more sound
Churchman than was Wallace, and no boys could
have been more thoroughly grounded in the
Church Catechism, the thirty-nine Articles,
and religious knowledge generally than by
Wallace ; but Dr. Mitchinson was a younger
man at the commencement of his time
than Wallace was, and a more accomplished
scholar. Wallace had been educated at Charter-
house, under Russell ; Mitchinson at Durham,
under Elder, one of Russell's best boys ; and
Russell used to say that he thus looked on him as
a grandson ; and he thought most highly both of
his ability and his attainments. He further
procured a considerable augmentation in the
value of the King's Scholarships and Exhi-
bitions, built a new head-master's house, and
greatly added to and improved the whole of the
school buildings. In his time, 1859- 1873, more
university honours were attained by King's
Scholars than in any previous period of the
school's history. The same high reputation,
THE KING'S SCHOOL, CANTERBURY. 215
though in another way, was maintained as it had
been through the mastership of Dr. Beauvoir ; and
it was in the time of Dr. Mitchinson's successor, Dr.
Blore, that a King's Scholar, Lawrence J. Ottley,
scholar of C. C. C, and now Fellow of Magdalen,
who had received his earlier education under Dr.
Mitchinson, gained the first university prize since
Lord Tenterden (who, in 1784 and 1786, had
gained the Chancellor's Prize for Latin Verse and
English Essay), by obtaining the Hertford
Scholarship. A former alumnus of the school, who
knew nothing about University Scholarships, once
spoke of it as "a poor thing" that no one from
the King's School had for so long a time gained
any great University Scholarship or Prize. It
could scarcely be said " to be a poor thing " not to
obtain one, but it was unquestionably a great
thing to be successful in a competition for which
none but the first scholars in the university would
ever think of entering.
Dr. Blore also brought great and varied
attainments, together with the prestige, like Dr.
Mitchinson, of the highest honours from Oxford,
to the work which he took up, on Dr. Mitchinson's
consecration to the Bishopric of Barbados. He
ably and worthily maintained the high character
2i6 BYGONE KENT.
for scholarship which the school had obtained ;
and on his retirement, in 1886, after thirteen
years of successful work, he was succeeded by the
present headmaster, the Rev. Thomas Field, a
pupil of Dr. Mitchinson. He brought to the
work before him the antecedents of a scholarship
of C. C. C, Oxford, two classical first classes, a
fellowship at Magdalen, and a mastership at
Harrow. Under his careful diligence the school
has no doubt before it a brilliant future. Its visitors,
the Archbishops of Canterbury, have, of late years
especially, shown an active interest in it, and the
Dean and Chapter, as its governors, have
promoted those interests not only by their
influence, but by their personal care and knowledge
of the boys. One of its warmest friends was the
late Bishop (Parry) of Dover ; and his successor,
Bishop Eden, shows similar interest in the school.
Among the more eminent of its alumni who
have not yet been mentioned in this brief notice,
are : — Christopher Marlowe, the dramatist (1574) ;
John Boyle, Bishop of Cork (1578); Richard
Boyle, Earl of Cork (1580); Dean Boys of
Canterbury (1582) ; Dr. Wm. Harvey, of immortal
memory, as one of the greatest of England's
physicians (1588) ; Accepted Frewen, Archbishop
THE KING'S SCHOOL, CANTERBURY. 217
of York (1598) ; Gostling, the historian of Canter-
bury (1736) ; Dean Lynch of Canterbury (1707) ;
Archdeacon Randolph, President of C. C. C,
Oxford (1709); Castle, Dean of Hereford, and
Master of C.C.C, Cambridge (1710); Herbert
Marsh, Bishop of Peterborough (1770) ; and
William Grant Broughton, Bishop of Sydney
(1797)-
This notice cannot claim to be more than a
sketch in but faint outlines, and touching if
anything more on the modern and present, than
on the origin and past, history of the school. But
perhaps those who read this paper will for
the most part feel greater interest in this more
modern period of the school's history. As for
the past history of the institution it is greatly to
be wished that a fuller and more complete account
may some day be produced than my " Memorials "
of 1865. It is to be hoped too that the time has
passed when office fees and other such obstacles
can prevent access to documents which any one
engaged in such a pursuit can have but one
object in wishing to search.
SmuggliriG in 1Rcnt
ANY book on the Kent of past days would be
lamentably defective if it did not contain
some allusions to smugglers and smuggling.
Whatever else " Bygone Kent " did, it smuggled.
It smuggled hard, it smuggled long, it smuggled
not unprofitably. Not a few substantial or
comfortable Kentish folk of to-day owe their
substance and comfort mainly to their grandfathers,
the eminent "free traders." For it is to be noted
these bygone worthies did not call themselves
smugglers, or anything else so coarse. They were
law-abiding, or if the law and their trade did seem
at variance sometimes, it was the law which was
wrong. They were "free-traders," as had been
their forefathers ever since the days of the
Conqueror. They explained the matter in this
wise. The Norman William struck a bargain
with the five chief ports of the south-eastern coast ;
these Cinque Ports were to furnish ships and men
for the use of their country when need was, and
in return they were to export and import as freely
SMUGGLING IN KENT. 219
as they could wish. This compact was loyally
kept on both sides for one hardly knows how
many hundreds of years. Many a gallant ship
did the ports send to their country's assistance,
and many a brave sailor from Sandwich, or
Hastings, or Dover, went out to fight his
sovereign's battles, and never to return. And
many a goodly cargo of wines or silks from
France, of woollens and diapers from the low
countries, did the citizens land on the Kentish
coasts, without fear of custom-house official or
revenue cutter. And as almost every town and
hamlet on the coast was either a Cinque Port or
a " limb " of one, it followed that the whole of the
Kentish shore was within the limits of "free-trade."
Of course the men of the neighbouring counties
were not to be expected to be behind their
Kentish neighbours, and indeed the Cinque Port
jurisdiction extended over parts of the coasts of
Essex and Sussex, so that "free trade" was
pretty well established from Yarmouth to the Isle
of Wight.
But degenerate days came. There arose
governments which knew not the Cinque Ports,
and which said that the smuggling, as they
coarsely called it, must stop. To take away
2 20 BYGONE KENT.
privileges without giving a quid pro quo was held
to be a shabby proceeding on the part of the
government, and the honest seafaring men of
Kent snapped their fingers at authorities, and
went on running cargoes as before. They were
as law-abiding as ever, when the law was in the
right, but in this case the law was clearly in the
wrong. Unluckily, the law had armed men and
revenue-cutters on its side, and the ancient coast
industry was at times carried on under decidedly
hampering conditions. But this was not by any
means the first time the men of the fine old
county had resisted tyranny on the part of govern-
ments, and so now official watchfulness was met
by extra caution, and trained troops by extra tact
and audacity.
Many a cave in the chalk cliffs was used as a
hiding-place for goods which had not been
subjected to the indignity of a duty, and there is
hardly a mile of rock-bound coast in Kent which
has not its " Smuggler's Cave." Still better
hiding-places were found in the Sandwich Flats
district, and in the water-logged Romney Marsh.
Casks of brandy and water-tight boxes of valuable
silks or tobaccos were weighted and sunk in the
interminable open land drains of the latter
SMUGGLING IN KENT.
district, to be fished up again when the meddhng
revenue officers had for the nonce ceased their
prying. Look-out places were built or adapted,
from which cunning systems of signals were sent
THE "smuggler's NEST " AT HYTHE.
to comrades afloat. Of these the famous
''Smuggler's Nest " at Hythe has happily remained
to our own days in pretty much its old form, and an
illustration of this picturesque old place is here
22 2 BYGONE KENT.
given. Then, rightly or wrongly, a certain
Belvedere at Deal, near the present well-known
Lloyd's signalling station, is credited with having
been a guide and friend to the good men of that
locality. But for that matter well nigh every village
along the coast of Kent can show its " Smuggler's
Nest," whatever may happen to be the particular
appellation of the building. All sorts of odd hiding
places were found, and adjoining families arranged
through communication by means of the cellars.
At Folkestone, we are gravely told, the whole of
the houses on one side of the street were thus
connected, so that whilst the officers were diligently
fumbling about the cellar of No. i in search of a
" free trader " who had been seen to enter the
house, the said free trader was quietly coming out
of No. 45 at the other end of the street.
Vessels galore were built for the " trade," and
very fine boats they were many of them, capacious
yet swift, and in all ways admirably adapted for
their peculiar duty. And a bolder yet withal a
better-humoured set of fellows never manned boat
than their crews. The whole of the seaside
population was of course interested in the
business, and each and all were ever ready to rally
round comrades in case of a contretemps, or to
SMUGGLING IN KENT. 223
help to trick the government officials. Many a
hard knock was received on both sides, and many
a goodly haul was made by the revenue.
Yet sometimes the " trade " had it all its own
way, and cargoes of untaxed goods were often
sold in broad daylight on the very beach. Many
are the funny stories told of how the officers were
outwitted, so many indeed that some of them may
probably be not uncharitably set down as pious
fictions. In one case however, the depositions
before the magistrates show that the unauthorised
cargoes were carried off under the very eyes of
the revenue officials, who were held by the mob at
the gate of the field in which the goods were
hidden. This took place at Folkestone in 1723.
But for really thrilling, and withal often funny,
accounts of "free trading" exploits the reader is
commended to some of the genuine old salts to be
met with even yet in some of the Kentish fishing
towns, notably Folkestone. A capital little
collection of stories, gathered from this and other
sources, is published by Mr. English of that
town. Many of the incidents related are very
droll, but we must not venture upon more than
one extract, or we may lay ourselves open to the
charge of being literary " free-traders." On the
224 BYGONE KENT.
incumbent of a country parish a mile or two
inland going to his " coach-house one morning, he
found to his surprise that he could not open the
door, and had to obtain access from the hay-loft
above. To his utter astonishment he discovered
the place was almost filled with kegs of spirits,
which had evidently been deposited there by smugg-
lers. He was in a fix, and quite at a loss what
course to pursue. H is loyalty would have prompted
him to give information, but his consideration for
his poor parishioners overcame his conscientious
scruples, and he resolved to take no notice, but to
wait the result. Perhaps it was well that he did
so, for we may be sure he was pretty closely
looked after by those interested in the consign-
ment, who, if they had seen any attempt to
'peach,' would have taken measures to prevent
it. Accordingly the tubs remained secure all day,
but the next morning they were all cleared out,
with the exception of one, which was labelled
' For our Parson.' "
Did all these little "free tradings" succeed on
the whole ? Well, the present writer can only say-
he was informed by an old gentleman that his
grandfather, a noted smuggler — the word has
slipped out somehow — a native of Deal, made at
SMUGGLING IN KENT. 225
the trade the round Httle sum of ;^40,ooo. That
certainly looked like paying, but it is to be feared
his was a somewhat solitary case. Yet not a few
of the "somebodies" inhabiting the coast towns,
who have never been known to toil or spin them-
selves, are the descendants of the old contra-
bandists, so that somebody must have made money.
The descendants not only feel no shame respect-
ing, but in many cases are very distinctly proud
of, their descent. And it would be both useless
and unpleasant to recall some of the not very
merciful or law-abiding exploits of the " bygones."
It is well known that the export of gold,
though, as far as possible prevented, was carried
on with great vigour, especially at Folkestone.
The profits were too enormous for the temptation
to be resisted. With the recital of a little story
anent this " guinea " trade this little sketch may be
brought to a conclusion. The writer heard the
story from the lips of a most worthy old
Folkestone sailor — now alas! no more — who
vouched for the truth of the story in every
particular. The father and mother of the
narrator lived in one of the narrow streets of old
Folkestone, famous as a haunt of smugglers.
The couple were about to retire to rest one dark
2 26 BYGONE KENT.
and stormy night, when they were startled by a
particular tapping at the window. Opening the
door, the occupant of the house perceived a man
enveloped in a huge cloak, and wearing a big
slouch hat, which prevented his face fromb eing
seen. Motioning to him to keep silence, the
stranger entered, and threw off his hat and cloak.
He was the head of a very great financial firm,
whose name is known all over the world. The
old Folkestoner knew his visitor well. A few
moments sufficed to explain how matters stood.
The eminent financier had a trifling matter of a
hundred thousand guineas, which he wanted to get
safely across the Strait, and he wanted to secrete
the sum till a favourable opportunity occurred.
After much debating it was agreed at last that
the couple should " sleep upon it " literally.
Accordingly the gold was carefully brought in,
in bags of a thousand guineas each. This was
laid between the bed and the mattress, — a
hundred bags of shining gold ! The couple slept
on this, or, at least, tried to do, for the old boy
afterwards declared that he spent the very
uneasiest night of his life on that gold. Next
day every bag was taken away. " What every
bag.'*" we asked, "surely one was left, or a part
SMUGGLING IN KENT. 227
of one!" "Not a single guinea out of a single
bag," replied the narrator, " and the best of it was,
my father could have stuck to it all ! They dared
not have made a row about it if he had stuck to
it, or it would have been worse still for 'em.
However, the firm's going to take my boy into
their bank, so it's all right."
Ibuoucnot Ibomee in Ikcnt.
By S. W. Kershaw, f.s.a.
THE county of Kent is perhaps richer than
many others in historical associations ; its
proximity to the coast, the main roads leading to
the metropolis, the former importance of the
Minster City of Canterbury, all contributed to
make the so-called "Garden of England" famous.
Among its past annals, few have inter-twined
themselves so closely with the religious, intellectual,
and commercial life of the district, as the advent
of the refugees, first from the Netherlands and
later from France, escaping the cruelty of the
Duke of Alva in the Low Countries, the St.
Bartholomew massacre in 1572, and from the'
results of the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes
in 1685.
Thus, two great emigrations occurred, distinct
in their bearings, but of much consequence to our
own history. The Reformation had sounded the
key-note to the changes in the ecclesiastical world,
and the advent of Edward VI. to the throne,
HUG UENOT HOMES IN KENT. 229
coupled with the Charter which he granted to the
foreign Protestants in 1550, for the free exercise
of their religion, made a fixed rallying point for
the fugitives to settle in England. These
advantages were increased in many ways, — by
the arrival of John a Lasco, a famous Pole, who
had the general superintendence of the foreign
churches. His influence, and the subsequent aid
of Cecil, Lord Burleigh, who obtained the King's
Letters Patent for a Protestant to set up a French
printing press, in 1552, are recorded in Strype's
life of Archbishop Cranmer.
The Book of Common Prayer was now
translated into F"rench, printed by Thomas
Gualtier in 1553, and dedicated to Thomas
Goodrich, Bishop of Ely.
The " Marches of Calais," as they were called,
were then in English possession, and the towns
therein had their orders from Cranmer for the
Bible to be read, and its different versions,
especially those in French, all had their in-
fluence in spreading the truth of the Reformed
doctrines, added to which the French church
of Guisnes, near Calais, was founded, and
drew together more closely both native and
foreign inhabitants, in one common sympathy.
230 B YGONE KENT.
It is not surprising, then, as we shall see, that a
larpfe number of those who settled in Eastern
Kent may be traced into districts round the
northern and opposite shore of France. Another
powerful aid was given by Archbishop Cranmer,
who, at his archiepiscopal houses of Lambeth
and Canterbury, warmly received John a Lasco,
Peter Martyr, Bucer, and other learned foreigners,
for the discussion of doctrinal questions which
were then uppermost in men's minds.
The old Palace of Canterbury is fraught with
many memories of Cranmer and the Elizabethan
Archbishops, who made it one of their chief homes;
the business of the See was as much transacted
in this glorious Kentish city,
" Where thoughts and shadows gather round,"
as in the distant metropolis. A fragment, how-
ever, but remains of this Palace, near the
Cathedral, and an archway and other portions,
built into modern houses, alone testify to the
former importance of a building in which so
many stirring events took place, from having
been a refuge to Thomas a Becket before his
murder, to the invasion of its precincts by the
Commonwealth soldiery.
Thus those refugees who first came into Kent,
HUG UENO T HOMES IN KENT. 2 3 1
or who approached It from London, found a
congenial welcome in the freedom of reHgious
worship and thought which the times afforded.
The arrival of many Walloons to Canterbury, in
1547, was the first actual settlement, and a con-
gregation of exiles was formed under the care of
Utenhovius, and the leadership of other eminent
men.
The death of Edward the VI. caused a great
change. Several of the English bishops and
divines, who had upheld Protestantism, fled to
Frankfort, Zurich, or Geneva, and then began that
dire persecution which darkened Queen Mary's
reign. In Canterbury, the spot known as the
" Martyrs' Field," a little outside the city,
commemorates their place of suffering, and it is
probable some of these were foreigners. The
accession of Elizabeth, in 1558, opens a brighter
page on this refugee colony, for about that date we
may assign the regular congregation in the Crypt
church of the Cathedral, which had been granted
for their use by the Queen, and afterwards by
the Dean and Chapter, remains in historic
sequence to this day.
The Walloons had now been increased by the
French contingent, who, even before the fatal
232 BYGONE KENT.
St. Bartholomew, escaped from the untold
severities which had been imposed on all who
tried to leave France.
Besides religious, commercial advantages were
secured to the newly-formed group of refugees
by their admission as freemen of the City of
Canterbury,* and in their successful petition to the
Mayor for grants of liberty and privilege to
exercise their callings, about the year 1561.
Weaving, and making of different woollen fabrics,
formed the staple industry, in 1564, we read
of one Giles Cousin, as " superintendent " of these
trades, and described by the local historian,
Somner, as " Magister operum et conductor totius
congregationis in opere."
The manufactories increased so rapidly that a
hall for essaying and receiving such goods,
and for other purposes, was established in the
quarter of the " Black Friars," along which the
little river Stour pursues its maze-like track.
This hall, though now converted to other uses, re-
mains in part, and shews how extensive a craft
must have been carried on by the "strangers."
The fanciful but picturesque tradition that the
*A paper on above subject, by R. Hovenden, F.s. A. , appeared in
Canterbury Press, 1884.
HUGUENOT HOMES IN KENT. 233
cathedral Crypt, fashioned so deftly by the great
medieval builder, Prior Ernulph, was used by
the weavers, is without real foundation in fact.
Rather can we imagine that the long and narrow
rooms, with their glazed windows, in the upper
floors of many a house in the old city lanes, were
the veritable houses where the loom and the
shuttle plied their busy trade. The influx of
Walloons and others was so great that, in 1641, a
book was furnished, " where their names shall be
entered, with their testimonials, it being found
that by their trade they are beneficial to the city."
In 1665, there were 126 master weavers, and the
number so great that Charles II. granted
them a charter to become a company ; the first
master was John Six, the warden and assistants
were John de Bois, John Lepine, Gideon
Despaigne, Peter le Houcq, Henry Despaigne,
Philip Leper, and others. Now that the
industrial element had grown so large, the con-
gregations had also increased, and we turn for a
moment to the annals of the Crypt church.
From its encouragement under Queen Elizabeth,
aided by the Primates Parker, Grindal, and
Whitgift, the community became very influential,
and at one period, about 1640, we learn that the
234 BYGONE KENT.
^ " congregation, for the most part of distressed
exiles, had grown so great that the place, in a
short time, is likely to prove a hive too little to
contain such a swarm."
This protection lasted till the days of Arch-
bishop Laud, when that Primate exercised a
coercive domination over all the refugee churches,
forcing them to a strict conformity with the
English ritual, causing thereby many dissensions,
and a breaking up of their numbers.
It is not to be supposed, however, that the
members of the foreign church here were without
their own differences, which arose on doctrinal
questions, to which the rise of Socinianism gave
a powerful impetus. It was owing to such
disagreement that many severed themselves from
the Crypt church, and formed a new place of
meeting in a building called the " Malthouse
Chapel," in or adjoining the once existing Arch-
bishop's Palace before alluded to, and called
themselves the " French uniform church." We
cannot pass unnoticed the long list of " Pasteurs"
who have presided over the fortunes of the Crypt
congregation from 1564 to the present day, and
whose names are recorded on a tablet inside the
* Somner's " Canterbury."
H UG UENO T HOMES IN KENT. 2 3 5
building. On the arched recesses, scripture
verses, copied from earlier sources, are to be seen,
reminding the exiled worshippers of their old
custom, when on the mountain slopes of southern
France they would sing aloud these hymns in one
vast assembly, thus recalling to them the sunny
land of their forefathers.
As time progressed, the foreign colony amalga-
mated with the native inhabitants, and resorted to
many of the parish churches, especially St.
Peter's, Holy Cross, and St. Alphage, whose
registers, replete with the names of "strangers,"
have been published and ably edited by Mr. J. M.
Cowper, of Canterbury.
In the eighteenth century is recorded many an
interchange of service between the incumbents
of these churches and the pastors of the French
congregation, and we may now trace the assimila-
tion of the two nationalities, and the absorption or
change of many a foreign family name into that
of its English equivalent.
In so rapid a survey, it is impossible to mention
more than some of the noted refugees who, either
at Canterbury or around, have left a distinct
memorial in the ranks of theology, literature, or
commercial enterprise. Of these may be named
236 BYGONE KENT.
Meric Casaubon, prebend and rector of Minster
and Monkton, whose father, Isaac, was illustrious
for his learning ; M. de L'Angle, who also held
Kentish livings, and died in 1724. John Castillion,
— the Dombrain family whose ancestors escaped
from France in an open boat, and whose
descendant is the present Vicar of Westwell,
Herault, Du Moulin, Charpentier, Durand, Le
Sueur and M. le Cene, from Caen, whose transla-
tion of the Bible and collection of rare manuscripts
worthily endorsed his memory. Among others
who have held official positions, representing the
county, may be cited the names of Cartier,
Delasaux, Fineux, Harrenc, Perrin, Petit, Picard,
and others to be found either in the city archives,
local histories, or in Diocesan registers.
The weaving trade, towards the end of the
eighteenth century, had greatly declined, though
efforts were made to uphold it, and a petition was
presented by Archbishop Tenison, asking him to
promote the bill to restrict the importation of
East India silks. Here may be mentioned the
influence and aid given by the Primates, Wake,
Tillotson, and Seeker, generally, in the cause of
relief for the distressed refugees, and specially to
those who were connected with the Kentish
HUG UENO T HOMES IN KENT. 2 3 7
capital or its district. In 1779, Hasted, the
historian, writes, " There are not more than ten
master weavers."
Though the industries rapidly lessened, and the
foreign families have dispersed, there still lingers
in this Minster city a strong representative
lineage, descended from those who lived and
laboured here and whose names survive on many
a tombstone, tablet, or ancient inscription : —
"As records stand alone
Of races that have passed away."
So powerful was this element that it was thought
advisable to place a stained glass window in the
east end of Holy Cross Church, and this memorial
to the Huguenots was unveiled in December,
1889.
There is thus a standing remembrance to
perpetuate the recollection of those who left home,
house, and kindred, to enjoy that freedom of
conscience which France had denied them.
Among the historical features with which this
ancient city is surrounded, not the least has
been the welcome and noble reception of those
strangers, who have not ungenerously requited
such kindness, and whose association with our
own lives has been vividly described by the late
238 BYGONE KENT.
Archbishop Tait. " I do not forget that in this
cathedral there still remains a memorial of those
days when the Church of England gave an asylum
to our persecuted brethren who came from other
lands, so there is something to remind us of our
connection with those who in distant lands
maintain, under great disadvantages, the truths for
which the Reformers were contented to die."*
Dover has been much identified with the
landing of the refugees. As the nearest port to
France, it would naturally attract the strangers,
whose stay here was often of short duration, most
of them proceeding to more industrial centres,
or to London.
The early settlements here are obscure, and the
trade, which was principally shipping, did not
admit of long continuance at a time. Our tenure
of the district round Calais caused much reciprocal
communication, and the migration of many
families from northern France to East Kent is not
surprising. This fact is corroborated by several
names in the register of the foreign church at
Guisnes re-appearing round Dover and the locality.
Sir Hugh Paulet was Governor of Calais in the
reign of Edward VI., when the French translation
* Diocesan charge, 1876.
nUGVENOr HOMES IN KENT. 239
of our Prayer Book was made and prepared by
the King's authority.
The State papers (domestic series) mention
that from 1619-23, the influx of strangers was
great, and that through Lord Zouch's mediation
Archbishop Abbot granted them the occasional
use of the parish church of St, Mary's. A return
of their members was ordered to be made,
communicants and non-communicants who are
worthy of receiving alms, and also that they
contribute towards the support of their fellow
countrymen. The varied nature of those refugees
who settled at Dover has always been a subject
for discussion, but it may be generally affirmed
that they were the French speaking Flemish of
northern France, who were succeeded by those
from the interior parts of that country.
A regular community appears to have been
formed in 1646, Philippe le Keux was their first
minister, and from the researches of W. H.
Overend, f.s.a.,^ four distinct congregations
were at different times represented in Dover,
beginning at the above date, and lasting till 17 10.
It does not appear the refugees ever had a
church of their own, though a most fortunate
"Strangers at Dover." Huguenot Society Proceedings, 1890, Vol. III.
240 BYGONE KENT.
circumstance lately occurred which resulted in
recovering its registers, not long ago " edited " and
published. The Dover church was represented in
the London colloquy of the foreign churches in
1646, and some of its pasteurs have been associated
with that at Canterbury and elsewhere in Kent.
The constant and shifting transit of the
strangers to and from this port has, notwith-
standing, left its impress on names which have sur-
vived, and given a local colouring to the town and
adjacent district. Especially that of Minet, a family
connected with the church of Guisnes, is found
again in or round Dover. Others of foreign lineage
may be quoted, as Beauvoir, Delannoy, Campre-
don, d'Evereux, Lavaure, Lernoult, Quetville,
Monins, Mommerie, and several which the
limits of this sketch will not allow.
Sandwich claims peculiar interest. For a very
long time it was the home of Dutch, Walloon, and
French refugees, its trading capabilities, harbour,
and river all contributed to make it a desirable
resort. The picturesque and quaint town of to-day,
its red tiled houses and sloping eaves, over which
the massive towers of St. Peter's and St. Clement's
rise so boldly, seems to be the very same as when
it welcomed the weary and distressed fugitives of
HUGUENOT HOMES IN KENT. 241
the 1 6th century. An ancient gateway or grey
stone parapet peeps out from some hidden corner,
while a carved bracket or oaken beam juts forth
from many a half timbered house.
Almost the first settlement here was in Queen
Elizabeth's reign, though there had been
arrivals from the Low Countries before that date.
Archbishop Parker visited Sandwich in 1563,
and noticed the French and Dutch, or both, and
it is recorded in his life by Strype that the
Primate said, on the occasion of his visit here,
" that profitable and gentle strangers ought to be
welcomed and not grudged at." Industrial
resources were abundant, and the archives
of 1622 (James I.) give a return of some 150
weavers, their trades and professions, the chief
of which was making of " bayes, lynsie woolsies,"
etc.
We find several foreign names at this port again
recurring at Norwich and Colchester, shewing that
there must have been inter-communication with
these towns, and that trade was diverted from one
place to another, according to its success or
decline.
Though jealousy could not fail to exist between
the natives and the strangers, the former learned
242 BYGONE KENT.
from the latter many industries, especially that of
cloth-making, spinning, etc., and on the Queen's
visit to Sandwich, in 1573, on one of her progresses
through Kent, these fabrics were exhibited to her.
Other occupations were carried on, as hatmakers,
taylors, whitesmiths, so that great activity prevailed
for some years.
A French congregation seem to have existed
here in 1568, according to a book of receipts, in
which is mentioned " I'eglise de Sandevuyt
Francaise." It does not appear the refugees ever
had a church of their own, but were allowed the
use of St. Clement's, to which they contributed a
sum for expenses, and a proportionate cost for
repairs.
This congregation, like the others in Kent,
came under the ban of Archbishop Laud, and
proceedings were taken against it to enforce
uniformity of worship, but the mightier events
which preceded the Scotch war were at hand, and
precluded further action. The harsh treatment
of the "strangers" is fully set forth in a rare
pamphlet by John Bulteel, minister of the French
church in Canterbury, and entitled "Troubles of
the three foreign churches in Kent." Allusion
has been made before to the industries which were
HUGUENOT HOMES IN KENT. 243
begun or perfected by the refugees, but we must
not forget that Sandwich claims the honour of
introduction by the Flemish of the homely
cabbage and celery, and so much were these
vegetables in demand that gardeners from this
ancient Cinque Port, settled at Battersea,
Bermondsey, and round London, and planted
those fields that even to-day shew traces of past
and successful culture.
Similarly, with the settlements at Dover and
Canterbury, that of Sandwich has bequeathed
names surviving to the present, and tracing back to
the time of the different immigrations. Of these
may be mentioned Van Dale, De Long, Cowper,
Sayer, Verrier, Rondeau, and others — in the
district around the same foreign element can
be identified.
Hythe, though in a lesser degree, is also
associated with our annals ; it is probable that the
refugees were few in number, and for their
religious exercises resorted to Dover or Canter-
bury. Connected with this place, however, is the
family of De Bouveries (Earl of Radnor), who
represented it in Parliament on several occasions.
The valued name of Huguessen, originally a
refugee from Dunkirk, and now better known
244 BYGONE KENT.
as Lord Brabourne, claims local importance.
Several well-born emigrds were chiefly mer-
chants from the Low Countries, and a list of
them, with their callings, is to be found in a
volume of the Camden Society, entitled " Foreign
Protestants, etc., resident in England," 1618-88,
In 1622, it appears that a return of the
strangers of Hythe by the mayor and jurists
was ordered to be sent to the Lieutenant of
Dover Castle.
The Weald of Kent can hardly be passed
unnoticed, for its varied industrial resources,
which naturally attracted the refugees, would lend
them substantial aid.
Foremost was the cloth trade, specially at
Cranbt-ook and Headcorn ; the arrival of Flemish
weavers, so long as the time of Richard IL,
may have induced succeeding strangers to
settle, and it was only towards the middle of the
18th century that the Kentish industry had to
compete with the great cities of Leeds and Brad-
ford, and to relinquish its local ascendancy.
Woollen goods were exported, and the sacking of
Antwerp, in 1576, transferred much of the trade
to England, and, in all probability, many foreign
craftsmen followed. Queen Elizabeth, always
HUGUENOT HOMES IN KENT. 245
ready to promote her subjects' welfare, secured
her manufacturers great prosperity. The cast Iron
industry, though much practised in Sussex, was
found in the Weald, and one of the master
founders employed as his principal assistant, Peter
Baude, a Frenchman, and to this day some of
the old furnace ponds remain. *
The Wealden annals, though scattered, may
fairly claim a part in " Bygone Kent," for in 1689,
four years after the Revocation of the Edict of
Nantes, we read that there was a collection at
Cranbrook in aid of the Protestant exiles, and
that Sir Thomas Roberts, an old inhabitant,
greatly sympathized in their cause. There
appears to have been no foreign church at all in
the district, but the strangers would have resorted
to the border town of Rye, where a French con-
gregation had been formed. The results from
their advent and residence are ably commented
on by Canon Jenkins, • who, in his " Diocesan
History," observes " they tended to leaven the
population with which they held daily intercourse —
those who had established their industries anions
them— -the clothiers of the Weald, the ironworkers
* " The names of Furnace Farm, Furnace Pond, and Cinder Hill, are
still preserved.'' — Furley's " Weald of Kent."
246 BYGONE KENT.
of the district bordering on Sussex, and the
gardening population of Sandwich and South-
East Kent — all contributed to the signal and
almost unparalleled success of a movement which
brought at the same time temporal prosperity
and spiritual freedom." Little remains to indicate
the past, but in the picturesque and gabled houses
in and near Cranbrook, which shew traces of
Flemish architecture, and in the cloth halls (now
converted into private use) the story of refugee
life can still be told.
At Faversham there was a French congregation
about 1696, and although few particulars are
extant as to this settlement, there is evidence in
the local names of a distinct foreign element, of
which the family of Giraud, both in this town and
surrounding districts, has long held honourable
mention.
Intimately connected with our subject is
Maidstone, where many industries attracted the
Walloon and Flemish fugitives, who came from
the Netherlands and formed a strong contingent
in 1573, having the Royal protection and
sympathy. The corporation granted them the
use of S. P'aith's Chapel and burial ground, and
before that date they petitioned the Queen to
H UG UENOT HOMES IN KENT. 247
allow them to establish their manufactures, which
was af ran ted.
The cloth trade was one of the staple com-
modities ; Guilds were established, to which
strangers had to be admitted before they could
practise their craft.
Threadmaking was another enterprise, and this
flourished in Maidstone for some time, till the
trade decayed by the importation of thread from
Flanders,
The State Papers of 1622 give a list of such
strangers born in the town, of which the thread-
makers formed a considerable portion. Their
religious liberties were permitted until, like the
other Kentish settlements, they came under the
Laudian sway, when many left the country, dis-
persing with them the industries which had
already benefited this district, and, as related by
the late Mr. Furley in his " History of the
Weald," "clothiers, merchants, and others, being
deprived of their ministers, and overburdened
with grievances, have departed the kingdom to
Holland and other parts."
Towards the end of the seventeenth century
the refugee annals of Maidstone are not so
frequent, and the strangers had either repaired to
248 BYGONE KENT.
the parish churches or had embraced Noncon-
formity, whose progress was much increased by
this addition to its ranks,
A remarkable instance of the effects of the
persecutions in France, and the singular accident
of its results in the little colony at Boughton
Malkerbe, near Maidstone, may fitly close this
chapter.
In 1 60 1, the Marquis de Venours, of Poitou,
sought protection in England, and having taken a
house and land here (probably Boughton Place),
the seat of the Wottons, had a recommendatory
letter from Archbishop Bancroft to the Rector
of this spot. '* That the inhabitants shall receive
him and his following with Christian charity, and
that as they do not understand English, the Arch-
bishop appoints M. Jacques Rondeau to preach
in the parish church of Boughton, to which access
may be given at such times as shall not hinder the
ordinary congregation." This proceeding fully
beArs out the generous character of Bancroft,
who, on more than one occasion, like Bishop
Ken, showed warm sympathy with the cause
of the suffering refugees, both by recom-
mending his clergy to raise subscriptions, and by
other assistance.
HUGUENOT HOMES IN KENT. 249
Round this neighbourhood, of which Maidstone
may be called a centre, many foreign names
assuredly had their origin ; in the settlements of
those was found freedom in this fair and favoured
County. The following may serve as examples : —
De la Douespie (East Farleigh). Le Geyt
(Chislet), De L'Angle (Tenterden), Fremoult
(Wotton), who were incumbents of the above
parishes.
In tracing but a few of the "homes and
haunts " of the strangers, we may apply to
them the graphic words which Canon Jenkins*
uses to those of the Cathedral city, "The numer-
ous surnames of purely French origin which
meet the eye in every direction, prove that a large
proportion of the inhabitants are the descendants
of the settlers from France and Flanders, in the
time of Edward the Sixth, and some of the most
eminent prebendaries of the Cathedral had a
similar origin."
* Diocesan History. Rev. R. C. Jenkins, 1881.
H)over Cacitle.
By E. Wollaston Knocker.
THIS fortification, crowning the white cliffs of
Albion, overlooked, centuries since, the
valley through which ran the estuary now known
as the river. Dour, three-and-a-half miles long, and
on its south side the antient small but walled
town of Dover.
The banks of the stream formed the landing-
place of Romans, Saxons, Vikings, and Normans ;
and around it in later years was formed the port,
at which in successive ages have arrived and
departed crusaders, pilgrims, sovereigns, tourists,
and pleasure-seekers.
The position is almost unrivalled throughout
the world ; it was the true clavis regni, and it has
been the scene of many interesting events and
several sieges.
When in b.c. 55 Julius Caesar landed in Kent,
he found hardy warriors with well-found chariots
to oppose his march inland, and it is not
improbable that the art of warfare thus learnt by
DOVER CASTLE. 251
the Britons may have led to the construction of
such an earthwork as that on which the Roman
Pharos still stands.
Caesar in his Commentaries makes no mention
of any fortifications which he constructed in this
realm. The first Roman cohort, 11 00 strong,
was stationed at Dover. It claimed the post of
honour and the custody of the imperial eagle. It
is not improbable that a fortification was erected
(a.d. 43-49) by Aulus Plautius or Publius Ostorius
Scapula, both generals of consular dignity, who
had been despatched with armies by the Emperor
Claudius, — the first to reduce part of Britain to a
Roman province, and the second to quell the
turbulent Britons who had refused to pay their
stipulated tribute. The castle was called Caesar's
Castle for some centuries.
The Pharos, or light-house, and its companion
on the opposite hill, were probably both of
Roman construction.
The one in the castle is thought to have been
used by the Normans for the purposes of defence.
The early Christian Church, dedicated to Saint
Mary, adjoining the Pharos, is said to have been
reconsecrated by St. Augustine. It requires a
volume to itself, and this has been admirably
252 BYGONE KENT.
provided by the Rev. Canon Puckle in his
history.
Much controversy has raged over its origin
and date, but these cannot be entered upon within
the hmits of this paper. Its restoration by the
Government for a military church has saved it
from the oblivion its ruined state for many years
seemed to portend.
Eadbald, the son of Ethelbert, who had been
Governor of the castle, after the death of his
father succeeded to the kingdom of Kent about
A.D. 600, and we are told that he founded a
college in connection with the church, and its
establishment has been stated at from six canons
and a provost to twenty-four.
It is difficult to determine the site of the
religious house used by these clerics, but it is
supposed to have been situated near Colton's Gate.
From the time of St. Augustine therefore (who
landed in Kent a.d. 596) it is probable that there
was a small separate ecclesiastical establishment
in the castle.
During the Wardenship of John de Fienes,
about A.D. 1084, it is said there were three chap-
lains, who had separate duties assigned to them, and
among these, that, not of punishing offenders, but
DOVER CASTLE. 253
of advising the Constable in the exercise of his
judicial functions.
From the subordinate position of these
chaplains and their successors is probably to be
attributed the fact that history tells so little about
the religious part of the castle administration.
At the Reformation the number of chaplains
was reduced to one, but service was regularly
performed until the year 1690.
Hengist (a.d 449-455) probably extended the
Brito-Romanic earthworks so as to include what
is now the keep yard, and he is stated to have
built the fortress. Its extension would at least
have provided for a larger garrison.
Horsa became Governor of the castle.
Alfred the Great was the first of the Saxon
kings who employed the mason in the art of
fortification, and he doubtless enclosed the Saxon
and Roman earthworks of the castle with walls,
gates, and towers.
Earl Godwin (who died a.d. 1053) ^'^ ^^ reign
of King Edward the Confessor, was perhaps the
first Lord Warden who was also Governor of the
castle. These offices have remained in combina-
tion to the present day. Godwin made consider-
able additions to the castle, and one tower, which
254 BYGONE KENT.
formerly stood at the entrance of the keep yard,
bore his name.
At the Norman Conquest (a.d. 1066) and after
the Battle of Hastings, William, Duke of
Normandy, marched first towards Dover Castle,
then the most important fortress of the kingdom,
and during the opposition to his approach, among
the privileges extracted from the Duke was the
one known as the law of gravelkind, which is
still in force in Kent, and regulates the descent
and inheritance of land in it. At the same time
(it is said) arose the fabled distinction between
" Men of Kent " and " Kentish men."
Duke William did not cross the Medway as a
Conqueror, so the inhabitants of the eastern
division of the county were styled " Men of
Kent." Hence, too, the County motto, " Invicta."
William remodelled and extended the castle
fortifications, enclosing the portion between the
British, Roman, and Saxon works and the edge of .
the cliff He also built some of the additional
towers in the outer wall.
To each he assigned one of his knights, and,
according to the custom of feudal tenure, made
him a grant of land on condition that he kept his
tower in a state of defence, and did service in the
DOVER CASTLE. 255
castle with a fixed number of retainers for a
specified period of the year.
Among these towers, commencing from the
south-east, are those of Albranche of Folkestone.
He delegated his command to one Rokesley,
whose name the tower afterwards bore.
Fulbert of Dover was Lord of the Manor
and Castle of Chilham in Kent, on condition that
he kept one fort in repair. Hence the tower
was first called Chilham, but its Deputy-Governor
was one Chaldercot, and the tower later was
called by his name. This tower had a small one
as an appendage to it, which took its name from
Hurst, a village near Chilham, the rents of which
were allotted to its repair and defence.
Near Fulbert's Tower was the Bodar's house.
As sergeant-at-arms he was also gaoler of the
adjoining prison.
For many centuries, and within the recollection
of the present generation, it was used as a prison
for debtors. These used to rincj a bell near the
outside of the Canon's Gate, and attract the
attention of passers by, to obtain alms in a box
placed close to the bell.
The next tower anciently took its name from
Arsick, its first commandant. He got Say to take
256 BYGONE KENT.
charge of it, and it was called after him, Say's
Tower. Two good estates, Langdon and
Pevington, were held by this tenure.
In the same way the defence of other towers
was provided for. Galton Tower, with which
was held Galton in Surrey on castle-guard tenure.
Peverill's, called also Beauchamp's and Marshal's
Tower. The Marshal resided in it. Porth's
Tower later named Castings. It was rebuilt by
Queen Mary and then called Mary's Tower.
The Constable's Tower, which was larger than
the others, was first named Fienes, or the
Newgate Tower, later after Hubert de Rurgh,
but because of its use by the governors for
business purposes it afterwards had its present
name, The Constable's Tower. It was for many
years the residence of the Deputy- Warden or
Deputy-Covernor of the castle (an office which
continued to the present century) and it is now
the official residence of the General commanding
the south-eastern district.
The towers to the north of this one are : —
Pencester (which was the Treasurer's or Pay-
master's residence) ; Godsfoes ; the Earl of
Norfolk's (Marshal of England) or Craville, which
commanded the royal bridge supposed to have
DOVER CASTLE. 257
been built by the Romans leading to the castle ;
Fitzwilliam's or John's ; Avranche or Maunsell's ;
Veville's ; Godwin's ; and Valence's or Morti-
mer's.
The commandants of all these towers held
estates on the castle-guard tenure.
Inside the castle were several towers :
Clintons ; Colton's Gate, near the Church (in
which were the chaplain's lodgings) ; Harcourt's
Tower ; The Fountain or Well Tower ; Arthur's
Gate, leading to Pencester Tower ; the Palace
Gate, leading to the palace or keep ; and the
Duke of Suffolk's Tower adjoining.
Near the last named was another Tower, in
which were stored all the arms, machines, and
stones necessary for the defence of the castle ;
adjoining to this arsenal was the King's kitchen.
Surrounding the keep and the keep yard are
lofty walls, having in them some of the towers
already named, and built against them were many
rooms formerly used for the accommodation of
the Court, and which are now used by men of the
Royal Artillery quartered there. Among these
was a hall called after the renowned King
Arthur.
The mere enumeration of these towers and
S
258 BYGONE KENT.
gates shows the importance attached to the
defence of the castle ; the large and numerous
estates alloted to its maintenance, and the
strength of the garrison.
The principal gates of the castle were the
Canons' Gate ; Friars or Old Gate ; the principal
one, long called the New Gate, because it took
the place of the older one through the Constable's
Tower, now known as the Queen's Entrance or
Constable's Gate ; a postern in Earl Godwin's
Tower ; and a small gate called the Ethetisfordian
Gate.
There is yet another approach. At the foot of
the cliff, between the castle and the sea,
Henry VIII. built a fortification called Moat's
Bulwark. A shaft was made in the cliff with
circular steps, by which access was given from the
bulwark to the castle. It is said that George IV.,
then Prince of Wales, in 1798, was conducted down
these steps as the nearest way to the town.
The keep, we are told, was 89 feet in height,
and its walls so thick that they had apartments
within them, and some of these can still be seen.
In it is Harold's Well, said to have been 240 paces
deep. Its importance during the sieges was duly
estimated. Harold swore to William of Nor-
DOVER CASTLE. 259
mandy to deliver it up with the castle. The well
still exists, though it has been partially filled in
from visitors having been allowed for many years
to throw pebbles down it to enable them to judge
of its great depth.
The keep contains two chapels ; the lower one,
called St. John's, near the grand staircase, is of
beautiful Norman work, which has been partially
restored. The upper one above it was a private
chapel for the use of the sovereigns and others
occupying the keep. The banqueting hall and
presence chamber are now used as armouries.
One of these was called Arthur's Hall, though it
is different from another in the Keep Yard which
bore the same name. These halls are of large size,
and were fitted for the uses of a royal residence
at the time they were so appropriated. Their oak
floors are said to consist of the original timber used
when they were constructed.
How many sieges, surprises, and reliefs the
castle has witnessed it would be difficult to
recount, even if the present space allowed.
The most important siege was that by the
Dauphin of France in 12 16, after he had marched
to London and laid waste Essex, Norfolk, and
Suffolk.
26o BYGONE KENT.
Stephen de Pencester, with 400 men, succeeded
in reinforcing the garrison by entering it
undiscovered, it is said, through the sally-port
under Godwin's Tower, But the Dauphin, after
a long siege, did not succeed in taking the castle.
In most of our civil commotions the castle
attracted the attention of both parties. So lately
as the troubles during the reign of Charles I., it
was taken by surprise in the night of the ist
August 1642, by a merchant named Drake, with a
few men who had scaled the cliff by the aid of
ladders and ropes.
Having secured the sentinel, they threw open
the gates, and the garrison being weak, and the
officer in command supposing in the dark that
the force against him was large, surrendered
the castle. The Earl of Warwick, who was at
Canterbury, sent a small force to guard it. It was
besieged afterwards by the Royalists, but the
siege was raised by a Parliamentary force sent for
that purpose.
Many of our Sovereigns have occasionally
resided there. Among these were : — Stephen, who
died at Dover, either in the castle or at one
of the religious houses. Henry II., on his way to
Normandy, Richard I., on embarking for the Holy
DOVER CASTLE. 261
Land, as well as on other occasions. Edward I.,
on his way to and from the Continent. Edward 1 1.
and Edward III., each several times.
Henry V. In his reign the Emperor Sigismund
was allowed to land on his assurance that he was
a messenger of peace. After seventy years,
during which period none of our kings visited the
castle, Henry V. embarked at Dover with an
army.
Henry VIII. was a regular visitor to the castle,
and embarked there for the Field of the Cloth of
Gold, having his then Queen at the castle.
Its last royal occupant is believed to have been
Charles I., who met his Queen, Henrietta of
France, on the grand staircase, and she made the
keep her abode on the night of her arrival, Sunday,
13th June 1625.
Beyond a visit by day made by Her present
Majesty, with Arthur, Duke of Wellington, there
appears to be no record of any intermediate visit
of an English sovereign. .
Many of the Lord Wardens of the Cinque
Ports, as Governors of Dover Castle, resided there
from time to time.
Several were members of the royal family,
others distinguished generals and statesmen.
262 BYGONE KENT.
Those of the present century have been, Pitt,
Hawkesbury, Wellington, Dalhousle, Palmerston,
Granville, W. H. Smith, and the present Lord
Warden, who is believed to be the 150th, the
Marquis of Dufferin and Ava.
Possibly no castle can boast such a succession
of governors, so identified with the interests of
the kingdom that to write their lives would be to
re-write its history.
Many have seen something of the wonder-
ful subterranean passages of the castle.
These were perhaps originally formed to give
means of escape, or communications with the
outside, to a beleaguered garrison. Tradition says
that there were passages to Walmer Castle,
Langdon Abbey, and St. Radigund's Abbey. At
Langdon there is still an opening to what may
have been such a passage.
During later years the passages inside the
castle have been adapted and extended for
defensive purposes. Whether or not they can be
so utilized now seems doubtful. As a modern
fortification the castle cannot take a high rank.
During the present century, Fort Burgoyne
has been constructed on the higher land to the
north and west, with the object no doubt of
DOVER CASTLE. 263
giving additional strength to the other fortifica-
tions at Dover, and thus of compelling an
invading army either to reduce the place or leave
a force of observation to protect its communica-
tions.
At present the castle is a garrison and military
storehouse only. Another well besides Harold's
has been sunk, but water is raised by steam
power.
Married soldiers' quarters, recreation rooms,
and all the modern accessories of barracks,
cluster round the remains which still speak to us
of bygone ages.
If there is but little other similarity between
the Dover Castle of the early Christian era, and
the Dover Castle of 1892 the sounds of discipline
and trumpets still echo within its walls.
This paper cannot lay claim to be original, or to
contain anything new, but it is only an attempt to
give a few facts upon a large subject deserving of
a better hand and more extended treatment.
3n^cv.
Abbey, St. Augustine's, 48
A'Becket, Thomas, the " trans-
lation," 102; Relics, no, 113;
Shrine, 112, 114
Act of Succession, 185
Alms box, ancient, 105
Appiedore, William, 138
Arran, Earl of, 161
Ayenbite of Inwyt, 193
Ball, John, 10, 130, 133134
Bampton, Thomas de, 132
Battles, Hastings, 5, at Maidstone,
16
Bealknass, Sir Robert, 132
Bean, Ellen, 12-13
Bek, Anthony, Bishop of Durham,
144-146
Bertha, Queen, 42-48
Boxley Rood of Grace, the, 125
Boy, definition of a, 213
Bralwurne, Lord, 244
Bulteel's pamphlet, 242
Burley, Sir Simon, 134
Canterbury, 5-6, 134
Canterbury, Archbishop of, 134,
138 ; Cathedral, 46
Canterbury Pilgrims, 97
Capitation Tax, 131
Cathedral of the Old Foundation,
209
Celery, etc., introduced, 243
Chrism due, 62
Christianity, decline of, 39
Christmas at Elthani, 148
Church or Basilica of Lyminge, 86-
96 ; P^oundation, 87 ; Restored
by Dunstan, 89 ; Endowed with
relics, 90 ; Manor House, 91 ;
Surrendered, 94 ; Ancient
Charters, 95
Church, St. Martin's, 4, 45 ; St.
Pancras, 47
Cloth trade, 244
Cobham, Lord, 10
Coucy, Ingebrand de, 149
Danes, the, 4-5
Dancing booth at Greenwich, 173
Dark Entry, Legend of, 12
Devil, the, at Montindene, 124
Dover Castle, 250 ; Roman I'ost,
251 ; Pharos, 251 ; Church of
St. Mary, 251 ; Eadbald's
College, 252 ; Chaplains, 252 ;
Hengistand Horsa,253; Alfred
the Great, 253 ; Godwin, 253 ;
William L, 254; Knight
service, 254 ; Debtor's prison,
255 ; Towers, 255-258 ; Gates,
258 ; the Keep, 258 ; Chapels,
259 ; Sieges, 259, Wells, 259,
263 ; Royal residents, etc. , 260 ;
Governors, 261-262 ; Subter-
ranean passages, 262
l^unstan, 89
Dutch in the Med way, 17
Elizabeth, Queen, 161
Ellis, Dr. A. J., 195
Erasmus, 158
Essex, Earl of, 162
Ethelbert L, 4, 42-48
Ethelburga, Queen, 86-89
Ferry Chapels, 54
Fisher, John, 177; Early history, 177-
178; appointed to Rochester,
181 ; Defends Catherine, 184;
his superstition, 185 ; imprison-
ment, 185 ; trial, 186 ; priva-
tion, 187 ; execution, 188
Fleet, revolt in the, 16
Folkestone Smugglers, 225
French Invasion, 6
Froissart and Richard H. , 151
T
266
INDEX.
Gaunt, John of, 151
Gloucester, Duke of, 152
Gold, Export of, 225
Gravclkind, 254
Greenwich Fair, 167 ; Abolition,
176
I Tales, Sir Robert, 138
Henry VI., 151
Henry VIII. (Defender of the
Faith), 182-184; A cruel jest
of, 189
Hereford accuses Norfolk, 152
Historic Kent, i
Holy Maid of Kent, the, 185
Hubert de Burgh, 6
Huguenot Homes in Kent, 228 ;
Foreign weavers, 232 ; Laud's
action, 234; Places of Worship,
234 ; Noted refugees, 235 ;
Decline of Weaving, 236 ; re
Dover, 238 ; re Sandwich, 240;
1-e Hythe, 243 ; re Cranbrook,
245 ; 7-e Faversham, 246 ; re
Maidstone, 246 ; re Boughton,
248
Iron, cast, 245
James II., flight of, 18
John, King of France, 149
Kent, the Fair Maid of, 134, 138
Kentish dialects, etc., 190 ;
Provincial English, 191 ; Court
Dialect, 192 ; pronunciation,
196 ; curious phrases, 200 ;
Rustic vocabulary, 201 ; Pro-
verbs, etc., 204
Kentish Place-Names, 21 ; Deriva-
tions, 24-26 ; terminals, 27-31 ;
Ancient Ports, 31 ; Romney
Marsh, 33 ; Danish derivations,
35 ; Anglo-Saxon names in
France, 36
Kentish ships, etc., 218
King's School, the, Canterbury,
206 ; Eminent scholars, 207 ;
Head Masters, 210; Celebrities,
216
Knowles, Sir Robert, 140
Lambarde, William, 115; genealogy
of, 120; works of, 126
Lambeth Palace sacked, 136
Lanfranc, 90
Leland, John, 117
Lewis, Rev. John, 193
Lollards and Wiclifites, 10, 154
London Bridge, 136
Macomo, 172
Marriage by proxy, 1 53
Martyred Cardinal, the, 177
Mary, Queen, 161
Masque on Twelfth-Night, 159
Mildretha, 88
Miracles, re A'Becket, 101
Mitchinson, Rev. John, D.C.L., 213
Mylner, lakke, 131
Navarre, Joanna of, 153
Newton, Sir John, 134
Paper-chases, 213
Pegge, Samuel, 193
Penance of Henry II., loo, 106
Priest, tragic death of a, 7-9
Priestly imposture, 1 1
Punishment by Boiling, 185
Ray, 193
Reformation, lo-ii
ReguUjium (Reculver), 3-4
Restoration, the, 17
Revolt of the Villeins, 128 ;
Causes, 131 ; Leaders, 133 ; at
London, 136; Demands, 138;
leave London, 140; St. Alban's,
141 ; Essex men, 141 ; Suppres-
sion, 142; Parliament on, 142;
Royal grace, 143
Rich, Major General, 162
Richard II., 135, 137, 138-143
Richardson's Theatre, 168 ; riot at,
174
Richmond, Margaret, Countess of,
179
Rochester Cathedral, 48
Roman Remains, etc., 2-3
Royal Eltham, 144 ; re Building,
146 ; royal residents, 147-154 ;.
Armenia, King of, 151 ; royal
births, 147 ; decay, etc., 162-
166
Royalist Rising, a.d. 1648, 15
Ruined Chapels and Chantries, 51 :;
St. Katherine, Shorne, 51-54 ;
Bridge Chapel, Rochester, 54-
59 ; St. Lawrence de Longsole,,
59-60 ; St. Margaret, Helle,.
INDEX.
267
61-62; St. Mary at Milton,
63; Eslingham Chapel, 60;
St. Lawrence, Mailing, 65 ;
Dode Chapel, Luckiesclown,
65 ; Maplescoml) Church, 66 ;
Rokesley Church, 67 ; Lulling-
slone Church, 68 ; St. Leonard,
69 ; St. John, Chapel of, 70 ;
^lerston Church, 72 ; Paddles-
worth Church, 73 ; St. Mary's
Chapel, Swanscomb, 73 ; St.
Mary's Chapel, Pembury, 74 ;
St. James's Chantry, 75 ; .St.
Bartholomew's, 75 ; Chapel of
Scots Grove, 77 ; St. Cathe-
rine, Fawkhaiii, 78 ; Cosenton
Chapel, 79 ; Tottington Chapel,
80; Cobham Chapel, 80; St.
Edmund the Martyr, 82 ;
Horsemonden Chantry, 83 ;
Maidstone, Chapel of Corpus
Christi, 84 ; Dover Round
Church, 85
Savoy, the, burnt, 136
Saxons, 4
.Shaw, the pantomimist, 170
Shurland, .Sir Robert, his crime, 7-9
Sigismund, Kmperor, 156
.Skippon, (jeneral, 17
Smuggling in Kent, 218
Smugglers' Nests, 221 ; Anecdote,.
223
Stable (Jate, 45
Statutes of Eltham, 161
St. Augustine and his Mission, 39
.St. Cregory, 40, 44
Still Christmas, the, 160
Straw, Jack, 132, 137
Taylor, Canon Isaac, on place-
names, 21
Threadmaking, 247
Tower, the, seized, 137
Villeins, league of, 129 ; .Sir .S,
Hurley's bondman, 134
Wallace, Rev. George, .M.A., 212
Walworth, Sir William, 139-140
Wat Tyler, 9, 133, 137 ; death of,
139-140
Windsor Castle, building of, 129
Wolsey, Cardinal, 158
Wombwell's, Catastrophe at, 171
Wyatt's rising, 14
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS
OF
WILLIAM ANDREWS & CO.,
THE HULL PRESS.
Elegantly bound in cloth gilt, demy 8uo., 6s.
Social Studies in its Historic Byways and Highways.
By WILLIAM ANDREWS, F.R.H.S.
Author of " Old Church Lore,^' "Curiosities of the
Chnrch" " Old Time Punishments," etc.
Contents :
Under Watch and Ward.
Under Lock and Key.
The Practice of Pledging.
The Minstrel in the Olden Time.
Curious Landholding Customs.
Curiosities of Slavery in England.
Buying and Selling in the Olden Time.
Curious Fair Customs.
Old Prejudices against Coal.
The Sedan-Chair.
Running Footmen.
The Early Days of the Umbrella.
A Talk about Tea.
Concerning Coffee.
The Horn-Book.
Fighting-Cocks in Schools.
Bull-Baiting.
The Badge of Poverty.
Patents to wear Nightcaps.
A Foolish Fashion.
Wedding Notices in the Last Century.
Selling Wives.
The Story of the Tinder Box.
The Invention of Friction Matches.
Body Snatching.
Christmas Under the Commonwealth.
Under the Mistletoe Bough.
A carefully prepared Index.
NUME-ROUS I L LUST-RAT IONS.
©pinions of tkt I^xzbb, q.^^
T/ie following are a few extracts from a large number of
favourable revietvs of " Bygone England" : —
"There is a large mass of information in this capital volume, and it is so
pleasantly put that many will be tempted to study it. Mr. Andrews has done
his work with great skill." — London Quarterly Review.
"Many are the subjects of interest introduced in this chatty volume." —
Saturday Review.
"We welcome ' Bygone England.' It is another of Mr. Andrews' meri-
torious achievements in the path of popularising archceological and old-time
information without in any way writing down to an ignoble level." — The
Antiquary.
"This is a book which will give instructon as well as entertainment to all
who read it, and it will serve to awaken interest in the old and quaint customs
of our native land." — Sala!s fournal.
" This informing and readable book will be welcome in any household." —
Yorkshire Post.
" The volume is admirably got up, and its contents are at once entertaining
and instructive. Mr. Andrews is quite a master of curious and out of the way
knowledge. " — Scottish Leader.
" ' A delightful book,' is the verdict that the reader will give after a perusal
of its pages. Mr. Andrews has presented to us in very pleasing form some
phases of the social life of England in the olden time." — Publishers' Circular.
"Some of the chapters are very interesting, and are most useful for those
who desire to know the origin and history of some of our daily practices and
amusements." — The World.
" In recommending this' book to the general public, we do so, feeling con-
fident that within it pages they will find much that is worth knowing, that
they will never find their interest flag, nor their curiosity ungratified." — Hull
Daily News.
"A volume which may be cordially recommended to all who love to stray
in historical byways. " — Shields Daily Gazette.
" A very readable and instructive volume." — The Globe.
" It is full of delicious antiquarian gossip." — Liverpool Mercury.
" It is impossible to read this book without a feeling of gratitude to Mr.
Andrews for his labours. The subjects have been so well selected, and are
treated in so attractive a manner, that the reader may open the volume at any
page and find something which will rivet his attention. ... A good index
is provided, and the book is well printed and got up." — Manchester Examiner.
" A delightful volume for all who love to dive into the origin of social
habits and customs, and to penetrate into the byways of history." — Liverpool
Daily Post.
Hull : William Andrews & Co., The Hull Press.
Elegantly bound in cloth gilt, demy 8uo., 7s. 6d.
(§^%ou Beice0^er0pire :
Edited by WILLIAM ANDREWS, F.R.H.S.
Atithor of " Old Church Lore," " Curiosities of the Church"
" Old Time Punishments," etc.
Contentfi :
Historic Leicestershire. By Thomas Frost.
John Wiclif and Lutterworth. By John T. Page.
The Last Days of a Dynasty : An Introduction to Redmore
Fight.
The Battle of Bosworth. By Edward Lamplough.
Scenes at Bosworth : The Blue Boar at Leicester.
Bradgate and Lady Jane Grey. By John T. Page.
Leicester Castle. By L W. Dickinson, B.A.
Death of Cardinal Wolsey at Leicester Abbey. By L W.
Dickinson, B.A.
Belvoir Castle.
Robert, Earl of Leicester : A Chapter of Mediaeval History.
Local Proverbs and Folk Phrases. By T. Broadbent Trowsdale.
Festival Customs in Leicestershire. By Henrietta Ellis.
Witchcraft in Leicestershire. By J. Potter-Briscoe, F.R.H.S.
William Lilly, The Astrologer. By W. H. Thompson.
Gleanings from early Leicestershire Wills. By the Rev.
W. G. D. Fletcher, M.A., F.S.A.
Punishments of the Past.
Laurence Ferrers, the Murderer-Earl. By T. Broadbent
Trowsdale.
The Last Gibbet. By Thomas Frost.
The Ancient Water-Mills at Loughborough. By the Rev.
W. G. D. Fletcher, M.A., F.S.A.
Ashby-de-la-Zouch Castle and its Associations ; Ashby-de-la-
Zouch and the French Prisoners. By Canon Denton, M.A.
Miss Mary Linwood : An Artist with the Needle. By William
Andrews, F.R.H.S.
Street Cries. By F. T. Mott, F.R.G.S.
Minstrelsy in Leicester. By the Rev. Geo. S. Tyack, B.A.
Index.
Elegantly hound in cloth gilt, demy 8uo., 2 vols., 7a. 6d. each.
Edited by WILLIAM ANDREWS, F.R.H.S.
Coii/ent.s of Volume I. : — Historic Lincolnshire, by John Nicholson — The
Ancient Boat at Brigg, by T Tindall Wildridge — Havelok, the Dane, by
Mabel Peacock — The Crowle Stone, by the Rev. Geo. S Tyack, «.a. —
A Roman Arch — A Curious Legend, by the Rev. VV Henry Jones —
Quaint Land Tenures and Customs of the Manor, by T Broadbent
Trowsdale, f.r.h.s. — Swineshead : The Story of King John's Death, by
Edward Lam plough — Barton-on-Humber in the Olden Time, by C H
Crowder — Pirates in the Humber, by Edward Peacock, f.s.a. — The
Pilgrimage of Crace, by Frederick Ross, k.r.h.s. — Horncastle or Winsby
Fight, by Edward Lamplough — Somersby Manor and Gross, by J G Hall
— Some Old Lincolnshire Gilds, by the Rev. J Malet Lambert, m.a., ll.d.
— Somerton Castle and its Royal Captive, by Theo Arthur — The
Champion, by William Andrews, f.k.h.s. — Haxey Hood — Bull-Running,
by John H Leggott, k.k.h.s. — Henry Welby, the Grub Street Hermit,
by Theo Arthur— The Plague in Alford, 1630, by the Rev. Geo S
Tyack, b.a. — Kirke White in Lincolnshire, by Alfred Lishman — Index.
Contents of Volume II. : — Lincoln Cathedral, by T Tindall Wildridge
— Lincoln Castle, by E Mansell Sympson, m.d. — ^Tattershall, its Lords,
its Castle, and its Church, by E Mansell Sympson, m.d. — Bolingbroke
Castle, by Tom Robinson, m.d. ^Ancient Stained Gla.=s at Barton-on-
Humber, and the great Earl Beaumont, by T Tindall Wildridge — On the
Population of Lincolnshire, by Tom Robinson, m.d. — Su{)erstitious
Beliefs and Customs of Lincolnshire, by the Rev. Wm. Proctor Swaby, d.d.
— The Legend of Byard's Leap, by the Rev. J Conway Walter —
Thornton Abbey, by Frederick Ross, f.r.h.s. — The Witches of Belvoir,
by T Broadbent Trowsdale — The Battle of Lincoln, by Edward
Lamplough — Lincoln Fair, by Edward Lamplough — Alford Fight, by the
Rev. Geo S Tyack, b.a. — Robert de Brunne, by Frederick Ross, f.k.h.s.
— Dr. Dodd, the Forger, by John T Page — Sir Isaac Newton — Barton-
on-Humber Ferry, by C H Crowder — An Eighteenth Century Poet, by
the Rev. Alan Cheales, m.a. — Lincolnshire a Century Ago — Spalding
Gentlemen's Society, by Dr. Perry — The Great Brass Welkyn of Boston,
by William Stevenson — The Great Hawthorn Tree of Fishtoft — Index.
PRESS OPINION.
" Mr. W^m. Andrews collects together a series of papers, by various
competent hands, on the history, antiquities, and folk-lore of the great
eastern county whicli has borne so conspicuous a part in the past history
of England, and produced so many men who have illustrated it. . . A
valuable contribution to local history." — The Times.
HULL : WILLIAM ANDREWS & CO., THE HULL PRESS.
London : SImpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent, & Co., Ltd.
T
Elegantly bound in cloth gilt, demy 8uo., price 7s. 6d.
Only 750 copies printed, and each copy numbered.
(§^%ou (B60e;r :
Its History, Folk-Lore, and Memorable Men and
Women.
Edited by WILLIAM ANDREWS, f.r.h.s.,
Author of **01d-Time Punishments," ** Curiosities of
the Church," "Old Church Lore."
CONTENTS.
Historic Essex, by Thomas Frost— Epping Forest : Its History,
Customs, and Laws, by Jesse Quail — Greenstead Church, by Edward
Lamplough — The Burial of Harold at Waltham, by William
Winters, f.k. h.s. — St. Osyth's Prioiy, by John T Page — Colchester in
Olden Times, by Joseph W Spurgeon — The Siege of Colchester, by
Joseph W Spurgeon — Colchester : Its Historic Buildings and Famous
Men, by Joseph W Spurgeon — Essex Tokens, by Thomas Forster —
Queen Elizabeth at Tilbury : A Glance at Armada Days, by Edward
Lamplough — The Lawless Court, by the Rev. Geo. S Tyack, b.a. — The
Dunmow Flitch — A Deserted Primitive Village, by ii Fredk. Beaumont
— W^illiam Hunter, the Young Martyr of Brentwood, by John W Odling
— Fairlop Fair by John W Odling — Thomas Tusser and his "Five
Hundred Points of Good Husbandry," by W^ H Thompson — John Ray,
Naturalist, by W H Thompson — Wanstead House, by John T Page^
Hopkins, the Witchfinder, by Frederick Ross, f.r.h.s. — An Essex Poet,
by the Rev. Geo. S Tyack, b.a. —Historic Harwich — Old Bow Bridge, by
John T Page — Index.
PRESS OPINIONS.
" Readable as well as instructive, and it has an interest for many more
than Essex people." — The Globe.
" Good paper, good type, and good illustrations all help to make
'Bygone Essex' an exceedingly pleasant and agreeable book." — Sala'f
Journal.
' ' This work will be welcomed by all intelligent explorers of their own
country, who cannot fail to regard its ancient monuments and historic
localities with renewed interest after perusing it." — The Gentlewoman.
HULL: WILLIAM ANDREWS & CO., THE HULL PRESS.
London : Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent, & Co., Ltd.
Only 750 copies printed, and each copy numbered.
Elegantly bonud in cloth gilt, demy 8vo. , js. 6d,
^y^o^owt Xanca6birc»
Edited by ERNEST AXON.
Contents : — Historic I-Ancashire, by Ernest Axon — The Religious Life of
Lancashire during the Commonwealth, by W A Shaw, m.a., — Kersal
Moor, by Janet Armytage — A Lancaster Worthy (Thomas Covell), by
William Hewitson — Some Early Manchester Grammar School Boys, by
Ernest Axon — The Sworn Men of Amounderness, by Lieut. -Col. Henry
Fishwick, f.s.a. — Lancashire Sundials, by William E A Axon, m.r.s.l,
— The Plague in Liverpool, by J Cooper Morley — The Old Dated Bell at
Claughton, by Robert Langton, f.r.h.s. — The Children of Tim Bobbin, by
Ernest Axon — The " Black Art " at Bolton — An Infant Prodigy in 1679,
by Arthur W Croxton — Wife Desertion in the Olden Times — The Colquitt
Family of Liverpool — Some Old Lancashire Punishments — Bury Siranels —
Eccles Wakes, by H Cottam — Furness Abbey — Colonel Rosworm and the
Siege of Manchester, by Ceorge C Yates, f.s.a. — Poems of Lancashire
Places, by William E A Axon, m.r.s.Tj. — Father Arrowsmith's Hand, by
Rushworth Armytage — Index — Illustrated.
"A work of considerable historical and archa;ological interest."—
Ltrerpool Daily PoMt.
' ' The book is handsomely got up. " — Manchester Guardian.
" In the collection of papers forming this highly interesting volume,
many antiquarian and historical matters connected with the County
Palatine are dealt with, and at least a dozen authors have contributed
essays rich in curious facts. . . All the articles are good, and should
make this volume a favourite among the historical students of the County
Palatine. " — Liverpool Mermry.
" The book is excellently printed and bound." — Library Review.
" ' Bygone Lancashire' is a welcome addition to the literature of the
County, and we echo the hope expressed by the editor that its appearance
' may encourage the local patriotism which is such a striking character-
istic of the Lancashire Lad.' It may be added that the work, which
contains a few illustrations, is well got up, and does credit to the
publishers. " — Manchester Courier.
" This is another of those clearly-printed, well-covered, readable,
accurate, and entertaining ' Bygone ' volumes that come forth with
pleasant frequency from the Andrews' press, Hull. . . The volume is
sure of a ready sale among the more intelligent of the ' Lanca.shire Lads.' "
— Antiquary.
HULL : WILLIAM ANDREWS & CO., THE HULL PRESS.
London : Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent, & Co., Ltd,
Elegantly hound in cloth gilt, demy 8vo., price ys. 6d.
Only 500 copies printed, and each copy numbered.
BYlJOJlE WOpAMpTOWgpII^E,
Its History, Folk-Lore, and Memorable Men and Women.
Edited by WILLIAM ANDREWS, F.R.H.S.,
Author of "Old-Time Puniseiments," "Curiosities op" the Church,"
"Old Church Lore."
Content!^ : — Historic Norfchamptonshire, by Thomas Frost — The Eleanor
Crosses, by the Rev. Geo. STyack, b. a. — Fotheringhay : Past and Present,
by Mrs. Dempsey — The Battle of Naseby, by Edward Lamplough — The
Cottage Countess — The Charnel House at Rothwell, by Edward Chamber-
lain— The Gunpowder Plot, by John T Page— Earls Barton Church, by
T Tindall Wildridge— Old Fairs, by William Sharman— Witches and
Witchcraft, by Eugene Teesdale — The City of Peterborough, by Frederick
Ross, F.R.H.s. — The English Founders of the Washington Family of
America, by Thomas Frost — Ann Brad street, the Earliest American
Poetess— Liber Custumarum, Villas Northamptonia?, by Christopher A.
Markham, f.s. a. — Thomas Britton, the Musical Small-Coal Man, by E E
Cohen — Old Scarlett, the Peterborough Sexton — Accounts of Towcester
Constables, by John Nicholson — Miserere Shoemaker of Wellingborough,
by T Tindall Wildridge— Sir Thomas Tresham and his Buildings, by John
T Page — Northamptonshire Folk-Lore, by John Nicholson — Northampton-
shire Proverbs — An Ancient Hospital, by the Rev. I Wodhams, m.a. —
A carefully prepared Index — lUustrafioihs.
PRESS OPINIONS.
"The volume is very interesting, and for those vi'ho dwell in the county,
or whose tastes lead them to explore its history, it will have especial
attraction. " — Publishers' Circular.
"A welcome contribution to the literature of the county." — North-
ampton Herald.
" The book is published in a form that is well worthy of the high
standard that the Hull Press has achieved, and we can congratulate Mr.
Andrews on adding one more stone to the fabric of the bygone history of
the Midlands." — Hull Daily News.
" An interesting volume, as well as being got up in exceptionally good
style. The matter is well chosen and well rendered, so that the book is
not only a thing of beauty, but also a veritable treasure-house of reliable
and entertaining articles." — Beverley Independent.
" A welcome addition to the shelves of anyone interested in the
antiquities of Northamptonshire, while even those who are not, will be
able to pleasantly while away many odd half-hours by perusing its pages."
— Kettering Leader.
HULL : WILLIAM ANDREWS & CO., THE HULL PRESS.
I^ONpoN : SiMPKTN, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent, & Co., Ltd,
Elegantly bound in cloth gilt, demy 8vo., price 7s. 6d.
JS^gone 2)erb^6bire:
Its History, Romance, Folk-Lore, Curious
Customs, etc.
Edited by WILLIAM ANDREWS, f.r.h.s.
T~\ERBYSHIRE is rich in historical associations of an out-of-the-way
^-^ character. In the pages of ' ' Bygone Derbyshire " are presented
in a readable, and at the same time in a scholar-like style, papers, pro-
fusely illustrated, bearing on such subjects as the history of the county,
ancient castles, monumental brasses, gleanings from parochial records,
old church lore, family romance, traditions, curious customs, witchcraft
well-dressing, old-time sports, etc., etc.
Contents : — Historic Derbyshire — On an Early Christian Tomb at Wirks-
worth — Curious Derbyshire Lead-Mining Customs — The Place-Nam
Derby — Duffield Castle— Haddon Hall— The Romance of Haddon Hall —
The Ordeal of Touch— The Monumental Brasses at Tideswell — Bolsover
Castle — The Lamp of St. Helen — Peveril Castle — Samuel Slater, the
Father of the American Cotton Manufacture — The Bakewell Witches —
Mary Queen of Scots in Derbyshire — The Babington Conspiracy — Eyam
and its Sad Memories — Well-Dressing — Old-Time Football — After Thirty
Years ; An Incident of the Civil War — Derbyshire and the '45 — Bess of
Hardwick — Shadows of Romance — Index.
-^1- PRESS OPINIONS. -1^-
"' Bygone Derbyshire ' is a valuable and interesting contribution to
local history and archs^ology." — The Times.
" The volume is pleasant reading of a most attractive county." — Daily
Telegraph.
"A very interesting and welcome addition to the literature of Derby
shire. " — Derbyshire Courier.
" Mr. Andrews is to be warmly complimented on the all-round
excellence of his work, which forms a valuable addition to Derbyshire
literature." — Alfreton Journal.
" A valuable addition to any library." — Derbyshire Times.
HULL : WILLIAM ANDREWS & CO., THE HULL PRESS.
London : Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent, & Co., Ltd.
Elegantly bound in cloth gilt, demy 8vo., price 7s. 6d.
By FREDERICK ROSS, F.R.H.S.,
Author of " Yorkshire Family Romance," "Legendary
Yorkshire," etc.
CONTENTS.
The Walls and Gates — Episodes in the Annals of Cheapside — Bishops-
gate Street Within and Without — Aldersgate Street and St. Martin's-le-
Grand — Old Broad Street — Chaucer and the Tabard — The Priory of the
Holy Trinity, Aldgate — Convent of the Sisters Minoresses of the Order
of St. Clare, Aldgate — The Abbey of St. Mary of Graces, or East Minster
— The Barons Fitzwalter of Baynard's Castle — Sir Nicholas Brember,
Knight, Lord Mayor of London — An Olden Time Bishop of London :
Robert de Braybrook — A Brave Old London Bishop : Fulco Bas.set — An
Old London l>iarist — Index.
PRESS OPINIONS.
" Mr. Ross deals with the chief episodes in the history of London
architecture, and with existing London antiquities in a garrulous, genial
spirit, which renders his book generally attractive."— T/te Times.
"Beyond all doubt a more interesting and withal informing volume
than ' Bygone London ' it has not been our good fortune to come across
for many a long day." — The City PreM.
PRICE ONE SHILLING.
^^ In the Temple,
eO/NTEMTS.
In the Temple — The Knights Templars — The Devil's Own — Christmas in
the Temple — Howto become a Templar — On Keeping Terms — Call Parties.
•' Amusing and interesting sketches." — Law Times.
" Pleasant gossip about the barristers' quarter." — Genfleiroman.
" A very pleasant little volume." — Globe.
" An entertaining little book." — Manchester Examiner.
HULL: WILLIAM ANDREWS & CO., THE HULL PRESS.
London : Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent, & Co., Ltd.
Rlei^atitly bound in cloth gilt, demy 8vo., 6s.
Legendary - yorkshire.
By FREDERICK ROSS, F.R.H.S.
Conteufx : — The Enchanted Cave— The Doomed City — The Worm of
Nunnington — The Devil's Arrows — The Giant Road Maker of Mulgrave —
The Virgin's Head of Halifax— The Dead Arm of St. Oswald the King —
The Translation of St. Hilda— A Miracle of St. John — The Beatified
Sisters— The Dragon of Wantley — The Miracles and Ghost of Watton —
The Murdered Hermit of Eskdale — The Calverley Ghost- The Bewitched
House of Wakefield.
PRESS OPINIONS.
Beverley Recorder says — " It is a work of lasting interest, and cannot
fail to delight the reader."
Driffield Obxerrer says : — The history and the litei-ature of our county
are now receiving marked attention, and Mr. Andrews merits the support
of the public for the production of this and the other interesting volumes
he has issued. We cannot speak too highly of this volume, the printing,
the paper, and the binding being faultless."
Elegantly bound in cloth gilt, demy 8vo. , 6s.
l!)orh8bive jfamil^ IRomaiice.
By FREDERICK ROSS, FR.H.S.
Coiittitls : — The Synod of Streoneshalh — The Doomed Heir of Osmother-
ley — St. Eadwine, The Royal Martyr — The Viceroy Siward — Phases in the
Life of a Political Martyr — The Murderer's Bride— The Earldom of Wiltes
— Blackfaced Clififord— The Shepherd Lord— The Felons of Ilkley— The
Ingilby Boar's Head — The Eland Tragedy — The Plumpton Mairiage — The
TopclifiFe Insurrection — Burning of Cottingham Castle — The Alum Workers
— The Maiden of Marblehead — Rise of the House of Phipps — The Traitor
Governor of Hull.
PRESS OPINIONS.
" The grasp and thoroughness of the writer is evident in every page,
and the book forms a valuable addition to the literature of the North
Country. " — Gentlewoman.
" Many will welcome this work." — Yortihire Pout.
HULL : WILLIAM ANDREWS & CO., THE HULL PRESS.
London : Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent, & Co., Ltd.
EteijanUy hound in cloth gilt, demy Svo. , price 6s.
LJorkshire Battles.
By EDWARD LAMPLOUGH.
Contents: — Winwidfield, etc. — Battle of Stamford Bridge — After Stam-
ford Bridge — Battle of the Standard— After the Battle of the Standard —
Battle of Myton Meadows — Battle of Boroughbridge — Battle of Byland
Abbey — In the Days of Edward III. and Richard II. — Battle of Bramham
Moor — Battle of Sandal — Battle of Towton — \orkshire under the Tudors
— Battle of Tadcaster — Battle of Leeds — Battle of Wakefield — Battle of
Adwalton Moor — Battle of Hull — Battle of Selby — Battle of Marston
Moor — Battle of Brunnanburgh — Fight off Flamborough Head — Index.
PRESS OPINIONS.
" A remarkably handsome volume, typographically equal to the best
productions of any European capital." — North British Daily Mail.
"An important work." — Beverley Independent.
" Does great credit to the new firm of book publishers." — Yorkshire
County Magazine.
" A beautifully printed volume." — Halifax Coiirier.
Cloth, 4s.
yorkshire in Olden Times.
Edited by WILLIAM ANDREWS, F.R.H.S.
Contents: — An Outline History of Yorkshire, by Thomas Frost — The
Cow-'Devil : A Legend of Craven, by William Brockie — The First Anglo-
Saxon Poet, by John H Leggott, k.r.h.s — The Battle of Brunnanburgh,
by Frederick Ross, f.r.h.s — Old Customs of York, by George Benson —
Elizabethan (cleanings, by Aaron Watson — The Fight for the Hornsea
Fishery, by T Tindall Wildridge — Folk Assemblies, by John Nicholson
— Quaint Cleanings from the Parish Register-Chest of Kirkby Wharfe,
by the Rev Richard Wilton, m.a. — The Wakefield Mysteries, by William
Henry Hudson- — A Biographical Romance, by William Andrews, f.k.h.s.
— Some Scraps andShredsof Yorkshire Superstitions, by W Sydney, f.r.s.l.
— The Salvation of Holderness, by Frederick Ross, f.r.h.s.— Yorkshire
Fairs and Festivals, by Thomas Frost — James Nayler, the Mad Quaker
who claimed to be the Messiah, by William Andrews, f.r.h.s — Duke
Richard's Doom : A Legend of Sandal Castle, by Edward Lamplough —
Obsolete Industries of the East Riding, by John Nicholson — Bolton
Abbey: Its History and Legends, by Alfred Chamberlain, ii.A. — To
Bolton Abbey, by the Rev E G Charlesworth.
PRESS OPINION,
"The work consists of a series of articles contributed by various
authors, and it thus has the merit of bringing together much special
knowledge fi'om a great number of sources. It is an entertaining
volume, full of interest for the general reader, as well as for the learned
and curious." — Shields Daily Gazette.
HULL: WILLIAM ANDREWS & CO., THE HULL PRESS.
London : Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent, & Co., Ltd.
SECOND EDITION. Bound in cloth gilt, demy 800. 63
Cutmxim of t^t CPurc^:
studies of Curious Customs, Services, and Records,
By WILLIAM ANDREWS, F.R.H.S.,
Author of "Historic Romance," "Famous Frosts and
FK.OST Fairs," " Historic Yorkshire," etc.
eO/MTEMTS:
Early Religious Plays : being: the Story of the English Stage in
its Church Cradle Days — The Caistor Gad-Whip Manorial
Service — Strange Serpent Stories— Church Ales — Rush-Bearing
—Fish in Lent— Concernirg Doles— Church Scrambling Chari-
ties—Briefs—Bells and Beacons for Travellers by Night— Hour
Glasses in Churches — Chained Books in Churches — Funeral
Effigies — Torchlight Burials — Simple Memorials of the Early
Dead — The Romance of Parish Registers — Dog Whippers and
Sluggard Wakers— Odd Items from Old Accounts— A carefully
compiled Index.
--® I LLUST-RATE-D. <®^
press ©pinions.
" A volume both entertaining and instructive, throwing much light on the manner*
and customs of bygone generations of Churchmen, and will be read to-day with much
interest." — Xc-:('dery House Magazine.
"An extremely interesting volume." — North British Daily Mail,
"A work of lasti:ig \n\.e.Tcsl."~huU Examiner.
" The reader will find much in this book to interest, instruct, and amu.se." — Home
Chimes.
" We feel sure that many will feel grateful to Mr. Andrews for having produced such
sn interesting book." — Tie Antiquary.
" A volume of great research and striking interest." — The Bookbuyer (Sew I'or/:).
" A valuable book." — Literary World {Boston, U.S.A.),
" An admirable book." — Sheffield Independent,
"An interesting, handsomely got up volume. . . , Mr. Andrews is always chatty
and expert in making a paper on a dry subject e.vceedingly readable." — Newcastle Courant
" Mr. William Andrews' new book, 'Curiosities of the Church,' adds another to the
series by which he has done so much to popularise antiquarian studies. . . . The book,
it should be added, has some quaint illustrations, and its rich matter is made available foi
reference by a full and cajrcfullv comuiled index." — Scotsman.
Hull : William Andrews & Co., The Hull Press.
London : Simphin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent, & Co., Ltd.
X
Elegantly bound in cloth gilt, demy 8uo., price 6s. •
Of^ epurcp Bore.
By WILLIAM ANDREWS, F.R.H.S.,
Author of " Curiosities of the Church" " Old-Tiyne Punishments,'''
^^ Historic Romattce," etc.
coi<rT]E:rq:Ts.
The Rig-ht of Sanctuary— The Romance of Trial— A Fight
between the Mayor of Hull and the Archbishop of
York— Chapels on Bridges— Charter Horns— The Old
Eng-lish Sunday — The Easter Sepulchre — St. Paul's
Cross— Cheapside Cross— The Biddenden Maids Charity
—Plagues and Pestilences— A King Curing an Abbot
of Indigestion— The Services and Customs of Royal
Oak Day— Marrying in a White Sheet— Marrying under
the Gallows— Kissing the Bride— Hot Ale at Weddings
—Marrying Children — The Passing Bell — Concerning
Coffins— The Curfew Bell— Curious Symbols of the Saints
—Acrobats on Steeples— A carefully-prepared Index.
--•• PRESS OPINIONS.-'^
" A worthy -work on a deeply interesting subject. . . . Wo
commend this book strongly." — European Mail.
"An interesting volume." — The Srotsvian.
"Contains much that will interest and instruct." — Glaxijow
JJercdd.
" The author has produced a book which is at once entertaining
and vjiluable, and which is also entitled to unstinted praise on the
ground of its admirable printing and binding." — S/iie/da Daily Gazette.
" Mr. Andrew.s' book does not contain a dull page. . . .
Deserves to meet with a very warm welcome." — Yorkuhire Post.
"Mr. Andrews, in 'Old Church Lore,' makes the musty
parchments and records he has consulted redolent with life and
actuality, and has added to his works a most interesting volume,
which, written in a light and easy narrative style, is anything but
of the ' dry -as-dust ' order. The book is handsomely got up, being
both bound and printed in an artistic fashion." — Northern Daily
Hull : William Andrews & Co., The Hull Press.
London : Simphin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent, & Co., Ltd.
Fcap 4to. Bevelled boards, gilt tops. . Price 4s,
jpamous jf vosts anb jfrost jfaits
in (Bteat Bvitain.
Chronicled from the Earliest to the Present Time.
By WILLIAM ANDREWS, f.r.h.s.
This work furnishes a carefully prepared account of all the great Frosts
occurring in this country from a. d. 134 to 1887. The numerous Frost
Fairs on the Thames are fully described, and illustrated with quaint
woodcuts, and several old ballads relating to the subject are reproduced.
It is tastefully printed and elegantly bound.
PRESS OPINIONS
" The work is thoroughly well written, it is careful in its facts, and may
be pronounced exhaustive on the subject. Illustrations are given of
several frost fairs on the Thames, and as a trustworthy record this volume
should be in every good library. The usefulness of the work is much
enhanced by a good index." — Public Opinion.
" A very interesting volume."- Northern Daily Teleijraph.
" A great deal of curious and valuable information is contained in these
pages. ... A comely volume." — Literary World.
" The work from first to last is a most attractive one, and the arts alike
of printer and binder have been brought into one to give it a pleasing
form." — Wakefield Free Press.
" An interesting and valuable work." — Went Middlesex Times.
" Not likely to fail in interest." — Manchester Guardian.
" The book is beautifully got up."—Barnfiley Independent.
' ' This chronology has been a task demanding extensive research and
considerable labour and patience, and Mr. Andrews is to be heartily con-
gratulated on the result." — Derby Daily Gazette.
" A volume of much interest and great importance." — Botherham
Advertiser.
One hundred copies only printed for sale, and each copy numbered.
Xtbe Evolution of Brama*
By SIDNEY W. CLARKE.
" A carefully written work. . . . It is a readable contribution to
dramatic history." — The Critic.
HULL : WILLIAM ANDREWS & CO., THE HULL PRESS.
London : Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent, & Co., Ltd.
Price 6s. Demy 8uo. Elegantly bound cloth gilt.
(^ (Ttton^^ in a ©anbi :
A Woman's Wanderings in Northern India.
By CHRISTINA S. BREMNER.
Contents : — The Ascent from the Plains to the Hills — Kasauli and its
Amusements — Theories on Heat — Simla, the Queen of the Hill Stations —
Starting Alone for the Interior — ^In Bussahir State — The Religious Festival
at Pangay — On Congress — ^On the Growing Poverty of India.
PRESS OPINIONS.
" The author of a ' Month in a Dandi ' has a facile pen, and is evidently
a shrewd observer. Her book differs from many belonging to the same
class by reason of its freshness, its spontaneity, and its abundance of
interesting detail. Moreover, the book is written with a purpose. ' If by
perusing these pages the reader obtains a clearer view of England's
attitude to her great dependency, if his prepossessions against ' black
men ' and the ' poor heathen ' should melt away in any degree, if the
assumption that what is good for England must necessarily be so for
India receives a slight shake, the writer will feel rewarded.' To these
conclusions one is almost certain to come when the experiences of Miss
Bremner's ' Month in a Dandi ' are recalled. There would be no end to
our quotations were we to reproduce all the passages we have marked as
being interesting. Miss Bremner is always in good spirits, and writes
with ease, and evidently con amove." — Birmimjham Daily Gazette.
" Miss Bremner's book describes a woman's wanderings in Northern
India, and it is written from adequate knowledge, with shrewd discern-
ment, and a pleasing amount of vivacity." — Speaker.
" ' A Month in a Dandi ' is full of instruction. It shows a great deal of
ability and determination to express truths, even if they be unpalatable.
The chapters on the vexed questions of Baboo culture and Indian
Congress are well worth reading." — Manchester Guardian.
" Miss Bremner's style is chastened, for the most part humorous, faithful
to detail, and oftentimes polished to literary excellence. The earlier
chapters are full of raciness and agreeable personality. —^/m// Daily Mail.
" ' A Month in a Dandi ' describes the writer's wanderings in Northern
India, following upon a shrewdly observant account of the seamy side of
Anglo-Indian Society. The subject throughout is approached from a
political economist's point of view. The chapter on the growing poverty
of India sounds a warning note." — Gentlewoman.
" The author of a ' Month in a Dandi ' is evidently a keen observer of
men and things, and we know that her opinion is shared by many of our
countrymen who have had a much larger experience of India and Indian
affairs than herself. The book is full of the most exquisite word pictures,
pictures that are full of light, beauty, and grace, but, unfortunately, some
of them have more shade than we care to see ; but, doubtless. Miss
Bremner's treatment is correct and life-like." — Hull Daily Neirs.
HULL : WILLIAM ANDREWS & CO., THE HULL PRESS.
London : Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent, & Co., Ltd.
^
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY
Los Angeles
This book is DUE on the last date stamped below.
Form L9-42m-8,'49(B5578)444
rruiT" T rrjOADV
DA Stead -
670 Bygouy K«nb,
K3S79
0£C 31 19512
DA
670
K3S79
UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FAOLITY
A 000 992 832 6