Skip to main content

Full text of "California fish and game"

See other formats


QMJFORNIAI 

FTSH-GAME 

"CONSERVATION  OF  WILDLIFE  THROUGH  EDUCATION" 


California  Fish  and  Game  is  a  journal  devoted  to  the  conser- 
vation of  wildlife.  If  its  contents  are  reproduced  elsewhere,  the 
authors  and  the  California  Department  of  Fish  and  Game  would 
appreciate  being  acknowledged. 

Effective  January  1,  1975 

The  free  mailing  list  will  be  limited  by  budgetary  considera- 
tions to  libraries,  scientific  institutions,  and  conservation  agencies. 

Subscriptions  must  be  renewed  annually  by  returning  the  post- 
card enclosed  with  each  October  issue.  Subscribers  are  asked  to 
report  changes  in  address  without  delay. 

Please  direct  correspondence  to: 

Robson  A.  Collins,  Editor 
California  Fish  and  Game 
350  Golden  Shore 
Long  Beach,  California  90802 

Individuals  and  organizations  who  do  not  qualify  for  the  free 
mailing  list  may  subscribe  at  a  rote  of  $5  per  year  or  obtain 
individual  issues  for  $1.50  per  copy  by  placing  their  orders  with 
California  Department  of  Fish  and  Game,  1416  Ninth  Street, 
Sacramento,  California  95814.  Money  orders  or  checks  should 
be  made  out  to  California  Department  of  Fish  and  Game,  1416 
Ninth  Street,  Sacramento,  California  95814.  Inquiries  regarding 
paid  subscriptions  should  be  directed  to  the  editor. 


u 


1 

1 


VOLUME  61 


JANUARY  1975 


NUMBER  1 


Published  Quarterly  by 

STATE  OF  CALIFORNIA 

THE  RESOURCES  AGENCY 

DEPARTMENT  OF  FISH  AND  GAME 


STATE  OF  CALIFORNIA 

EDMUND  G.  BROWN  JR.,  Governor 


THE  RESOURCES  AGENCY 

CLAIRE  T.  DEDRICK,  Secretary  for  Resources 

FISH  AND  GAME  COMMISSION 

TIMOTHY  M.  DOHENY,  President,  Los  Angeles 

JOSEPH   RUSS   III,  Vice  President  PETER  T.   FLETCHER,  Member 

Ferndole  Roncho   Santa    Fe 

BERGER  C.  BENSON,  Member  SHERMAN  CHICKERING,  Member 

San  Mateo  San   Francisco 


DEPARTMENT  OF  FISH  AND  GAME 

G.  RAY  ARNETT,  Director 

1416  9th  Street 
Sacramento  95814 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 
Editorial  Staff 

ROBSON    A.   COLLINS,    Editor-In-Chlef long    Beach 

KENNETH   A.    HASHAGEN,    Editor   for    Inland    Flsheriei Sacramento 

CAROL  M.   FERREL,   Editor  for  Wildlife Sacramento 

ROBERT  N.  TASTO,  Editor  for  Marine  Resources Menio  Park 

PAUL  M.  HUBBELL,  Editor  for  Salmon  and  Steeiheod Sacramento 

HAROLD  K.  CHADWICK,  Editor  for  Striped  Bass,  Sturgeon,  and  Shod Stockton 


(2) 


CONTENTS 

A  Black  Bear  Population  Study  in  Northern  California 

William  Piekielek  and  Timothy  S.  Burton      4 

Early  Larvae  of  the  Diamond  Turbot,  Hypsopsetta  guttulata 

Maxwell  B.  Eldridge    26 

The  Food  of  Neomysis  mercedis  Holmes  in  the  Sacramento-San 
Joaquin  Estuary Angela  L.  Baldo  Kost  and  Allen  W.  Knight     35 

Note  on  the  Ecology  of  the  Ratfish,  Hydrolagus  collei,  in  the  Gulf 
of  California C.  P.  Mathews    47 

Notes 

An  Unusually  Fast  Growth  Bate  for  Tilapia  zillii 

William,  J.  Hauser    54 

Notes  on  Some  Fishes  Collected  off  the  Outer  Coast  of  Baja  Cali- 
fornia  Eric  H.  Knaggs,  John  S.  Sunada,  and  Robert  N.  Lea    56 

Occurrence  of  the  Prowfish,  Zaprora  silenus  Jordan,  1896  in  Mon- 
terey Bay,  California Gregor  M.  Calliet  and  M.  Eric  Anderson     60 

Book  Reviews 63 


(3) 


Calif.  Fish  and  Game  61(1)  :  4-25.     1975. 

A  BLACK   BEAR   POPULATION   STUDY   IN 
NORTHERN   CALIFORNIA^ 

WILLIAM   PIEKIELEK 
School  of  Forestry  and  Conservation,  University  of  California,  Berkeley 

and 

TIMOTHY  S.   BURTON 

Wildlife  Management  Branch 

California  Department  of  Fish  and  Game 

Forty-three  wild  bears  were  culvert  trapped,  immobilized,  and  tagged 
in  a  limited  area  in  Trinity  County,  California,  during  the  summer 
and  fall  of  1972.  Eleven  depredation  bears  were  trapped  and  tagged 
throughout  the  county.  Sex  and  age  distribution  and  physical  charac- 
teristics   of    these    54    animals    are    summarized. 

Summer  movements  and  home  ranges  of  the  marked  bears  were 
small.  Average  known  maximum  summer  movement  was  1.85  miles 
(2.97  km),  increasing  in  fall  to  6.1  miles  (9.8  km).  Adult  females  with 
cubs  appeared  to  have  smaller  yearly  ranges  than  other  sex  and  age 
classes.  Summer  density  of  the  bear  population  in  the  study  area  was 
approximately  two  bears  per  square  mile  (2.6  km^).  Thirty-six  percent 
of  the  adult  females  were  with  cubs,  the  average  litter  1.67.  Summer 
food   habits   are  reported,   based   on   analysis   of    106   scats. 

INTRODUCTION 
The  black  bear,  Ursiis  amcricanus,  is  receivinjr  inereasint;  recognition 
as  an  integral  part  of  our  forest  environment  and  as  an  important  game 
species.  Improved  methods  of  handling  and  tagging  large  animals  have 
facilitated  black  bear  population  studies  in  the  last  2  decades.  This 
paper  reports  the  initial  phase  of  a  long  term  black  bear  population 
study  in  California.  Emphasis  in  the  first  year  of  the  project  was  on 
determining  population  composition  and  density,  movements,  food 
habits,  and  individual  physical  characteristics  of  black  bears  in  a  rep- 
resentative habitat  in  northern  California. 

STUDY  AREA 

A  study  area  of  approximately  115  square  miles  (298  km^)  was 
selected  east  and  south  of  Clair  Engle  Lake,  Trinity  County  (Figure 
1).  Most  of  the  study  area  is  contained  within  the  Shasta-Trinity  Na- 
tional Forest.  This  part  of  the  national  forest  is  in  "checker  board" 
ownership;  alternate  sections  are  privately  owned.  The  study  area  sup- 
ports a  relatively  high  density  of  bears  and  is  intersected  by  numerous 
logging  roads  providing  easy  access.  Although  major  emphasis  was 
given  to  tlie  study  area  outlined,  depredation  bears  (garbage  dump, 
campground,  and  other  nuisance  bears)  captured  elsewehere  in  Trinity 
County  are  included  in  the  analyses. 

The  study  area  lies  at  the  south  base  of  the  Trinity  Alps,  one  of  the 
principal  mountain  ranges  of  this  area.  Elevations  range  from  1,800  ft 
(549  m)  in  the  Lewiston  area  to  8,091  ft  (2,468  m)  at  Granite  Peak. 
The  area  consists  almost  entirely  of  timbered  or  brushy  gulches  divided 

^  This  study  was  supported  in  part  by  Federal  aid  in  Wildlife  Restoration  projects 
W-51-R  "Big  Game  Studies"  and  W-52-R  "Wildlife  Investigations  Laboratory." 
Accepted  for  publication  July  1974. 

(4) 


BLACK    BEAR   STUDY 


Lewiston  Lake 


Lewiston 


FIGURE   1.      Principal   bear  study    area   west  of  Clair   Engle   Lake,  Trinity   County,   California, 
showing  summer  trapping  sites  (o),  and  fall  trapping  sites  (•)  near  Lewiston. 


by  sharp  ridges,  with  local  elevation  changes  of  1,000  (305  m)  to  2,000 
ft  (610  m).  At  the  immediate  base  of  the  Trinity  Alps,  precipitous 
local  elevation  changes  approach  6,000  ft  (1,830  m). 

The  climate  of  the  area  is  typical  of  the  Pacific  Coast  with  local  con- 
ditions influenced  by  elevation  and  exposure.  Summers  are  dry  and 
warm ;  winters  are  cool  and  wet.  Snowfall  may  vary  greatly  from  year 
to  year  with  a  range  of  10  (25.4  cm)  to  70  (177.8  cm)  inches  recorded 
at  Weaverville.  Higher  elevations  receive  greater  amounts  of  precipi- 


6 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 


tation  in  the  form  of  snow.  The  spring  of  1972  was  unusually  dry  and 
the  fall  months  of  1972  were  unusually  wet. 

Most  of  the  study  area  is  covered  by  a  pine-fir  forest;  dominant 
species  are  Douglas  fir  {Pseudotsuga  menziesii)  and  yellow  pine (Pniws 
pondcrosa)  with  lesser  numbers  of  sugar  pine  (P.  lamhrrfifina)  and 
incense  cedar  {Lihocedrus  dccurrens)  (Figure  2).  Understory  trees  in 
the  conifer  forest  include  Pacific  madrone  (Arbutus  menziesii) ,  bigleaf 
maple  {Acer  macrophyllus)  and  Pacific  dogwood  (Cornus  nutiallii). 
Oak  woodland  and  manzanita  communities  are  on  some  soutli  facing 
slopes;  principal  species  are  Oregon  white  oak  (Qucrcus  garryana), 
California  black  oak  {Q.  kelloggii),  interior  live  oak  {Q.  wislizcnii), 
green  leaf  manzanita  {Arctostaphylos  patula),  and  white  leaf  man- 
zanita (A.  viscida).  Some  stands  of  digger  pine  (P.  sahiniay^a)  are  at 
lower  elevations.  A  few  small  wet  meadows  occur  at  higher  elevations, 
about  4,000  ft  (1,220  m).  Scientific  names  of  plants  were  taken  from 
Munz  and  Keck  (1959). 


FIGURE   2.      General   view    of   part   of   the    bear    study    area,    showing    intermixture    of   conifer 
timber  and  brush  fields  (largely  manzanita). 

Commercial  logging  plays  a  major  role  in  the  ecology  of  the  study 
area.  An  estimated  40  to  50%  of  the  study  area  has  been  at  least  par- 
tially logged  since  1950.  The  completion  of  tlie  Trinity  and  Lewiston 
dams  in  1962  had  an  important  effect  on  the  physical  aspects  of  the 
area.  Clair  Engle  Lake,  formed  by  the  Trinity  Dam,  inundated  much 
of  the  lowland  watershed  of  the  Trinity  River  and  some  of  its  major 
tributaries,  which  were  previously  winter  deer  range.  Tlie  upstream 
spawning  run  of  the  king  salmon  {Oncorhytichus  tshawytscha)  was 
stopped  at  the  breast  of  the  Lewiston  Dam. 

Another  recent  impact  on  the  study  area  is  the  great  influx  of 
summer  recreationists.  Within  the  study  area  there  are   11  national 


BLACK   BEAR    STUDY 


forest  campgrounds  and  one  major  private  resort.  However,  there  are 
few  year-round  residents  in  the  study  area. 

METHODS 
Trapping  Methods 

Trapping  took  place  in  two  different  time  periods.  A  summer  period, 
using  18  trapsites  (Figure  1),  extended  from  June  29  to  September  6, 
1972.  Limited  fall  trapping  was  undertaken  at  a  salmon  spawning  area 
near  Lewiston  between  October  2  and  October  13,  1972.  Depredation 
bear  trapping  was  done  throughout  the  summer  and  into  the  fall. 

Essentially  all  trapping  was  done  with  culvert  traps.  Emphasis  was 
placed  on  capturing  bears  in  natural  settings  in  a  defined  local  area. 
Traps  were  located  on  or  near  old  logging  roads.  "Call  baits,"  consist- 
ing of  fish  (wrapped  in  burlap)  or  road  killed  deer  hanging  in  trees, 
were  used  at  these  trapsites.  Trapsites  were  chosen  on  the  basis  of  bear 
sign  in  the  area  or  the  response  to  a  test  "call  bait"  placed  in  the  area. 
Traps  for  nuisance  bears  were  set  when  needed  at  campgrounds,  private 
homes  and  resorts  throughout  the  county.  Trap  bait  consisted  of  canned 
fish  base  catfood,  strawberry  jam  and  marshmallows.  Aldrich  snare 
settings  were  tested  as  a  trapping  method  the  last  two  nights  of  the 
summer  trapping  period. 

Trapping  success  was  expressed  in  terms  of  bear  captures  per  trap 
night.  During  the  summer  period  58  captures  of  38  different  bears  were 
made  in  156  culvert  trap  nights,  for  a  37%  capture  rate.  During  the 
fall  period  four  captures  of  four  different  bears  were  made  in  21  cul- 
vert trap  nights,  for  a  19%  capture  rate.  Fifteen  depredation  bear 
captures  of  14  different  bears  were  made  in  94  culvert  trap  nights  for  a 
16%  capture  rate.  Eleven  of  the  latter  were  immobilized,  tagged,  and 
transplanted.  One  bear  was  captured  by  a  snare  trap  in  six  trap  nights 
for  a  17%  capture  rate. 


FIGURE  3.     Immobilized  bear  being  processed  outside  of  trop. 


8  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

Immobilization,  Handling  and  Tagging 

Trapped  bears  were  immobilized  with  Sernylan  (phencyclidine 
hydrochloride)  injected  manually  using  a  syringe  with  a  3  ft  (0.9  m) 
fiberglass  extension  rod.  Dosages  were  administered  at  the  level  of  1 
mg  of  Sernylan  per  3  (1.30  kg)  to  4  lb.  (1.81  kg)  of  estimated  body 
weight.  Once  techniques  were  established,  average  time  from  first  injec- 
tion to  immobilization  was  approximately  30  min  with  a  range  of  3  to 
85  min.  Average  time  from  bear  immobilization  to  bear  arousal  was 
approximately  60  min  and  ranged  from  20  to  154  min.  No  lasting  ill 
effects  of  the  drug  were  noted,  and  the  immobilization  method  was  con- 
sidered satisfactory. 

Once  a  bear  was  immobilized  biological  data  were  recorded  (Figure 
3).  All  animals  were  then  marked  in  each  ear  with  metal  ear  tags  wdth 
attached  colored  plastic  streamers  which  identified  each  bear  individu- 
ally. Some  bears  were  also  tatooed  in  the  ear.  Retention  of  the  metal  ear 
tags  and  streamers  was  good;  only  one  metal  ear  tag  and  four  streamers 
were  known  lost.  Six  bears  were  also  fitted  with  radio  collars. 

After  marking,  bears  were  given  an  injection  of  Procaine  Penicillin  G 
as  a  general  prophylaxis. 

INDIVIDUAL  BLACK  BEAR  CHARACTERISTICS 

Color 

Of  54  bears  handled  and  three  cubs  observed  during  the  handling  of 
their  mothers,  33  (58%)  Avere  black  or  predominantly  black  with  only 
small  patches  of  another  color,  such  as  a  white  chest  blaze.  Twenty -one 
bears  (37%)  were  predominantly  a  shade  of  bro\vn  (Figure  5).  One 
bear  was  about  equally  brown  and  black.  Two  bears  were  predominantly 
blonde.  In  all,  eight  bears,  three  of  the  black  phase  and  five  of  the 
brown  phase,  had  white  breast  marks. 

Color  phases  of  the  black  bear  vary  from  region  to  region.  In  the 
eastern  United  States  most  bears  are  of  the  black  phase.  Black  (1958) 
reported  that  of  184  bears  handled  in  New  York  all  were  black  phase. 
In  Pennsylvania  the  situation  is  similar  with  only  a  few  cinnamon 
colored  bears  reported  (Pennsylvania  Game  Commission  1952).  In 
western  North  America  there  is  a  greater  mixture  of  color  phases. 
Records  compiled  from  fur  posts  in  British  Columbia,  Washington, 
Oregon  and  Idaho  between  1825  and  1857  (Cowan  1938)  indicated 
color  phase  ratios  from  63%  brown — 37%  black  in  Idaho  to  100%  black 
on  Vancouver  Island  (Figure  4).  In  the  Northwest  Pacific  area  there 
was  a  pronounced  increase  in  the  proportion  of  black  phase  bears  from 
south  to  north  and  also  from  east  to  west.  In  California,  Grinnell  et  al. 
(1937)  reported  that  bears  in  the  Sierra  Nevada  were  predominantly 
of  the  brown  phase.  The  Trinity  County  ratio  of  37%  brown — 58% 
black  corresponds  with  the  geographic  trends  in  color  reported  by 
Cowan. 

There  was  no  correlation  between  color  phase  and  sex  in  the  Trinity 
study  area.  However,  there  did  seem  to  be  an  unexplained  correlation 
between  color  and  age.  Of  five  cubs  handled  or  se^n  by  the  authors,  all 
were  black.  Of  six  yearlings  handled,  five  were  black.  Thus,  of  11  cubs 
and  yearlings  91%  were  black  while  of  the  total  sampled  population 
58%  were  black,  and  of  the  sampled  adult  bears  only  39%  were  black 
or  predominantly  black.  If  these  samples  are  representative  of  the  popu- 


BLACK   BEAR   STUDY 


FIGURE  5.     Sub-adult    bear   of    brown    phase    recovering    from    immobilizing    drug.    Note   ear 
markings, 

lation,  the  question  is  raised  whether  a  portion  of  the  population 
changes  with  age  from  black  to  a  lighter  color  phase.  We  have  no  proof 
that  such  change  occurs. 


Measurements 

The  following  measurements  were  taken  (in  inches)  from  immobilized 
bears:  body  length,  from  nose  tip  to  tail  bone  end;  shoulder  height, 
from  top  of  shoulder  to  base  of  ankle;  tail  length-,  from  base  of  tail 
to  end  of  tail  bone ;  neck  girth ;  chest  girth ;  head  length ;  head  width ; 
head  circumference ;  hind  foot  length ;  hind  foot  width  ;  hind  toe  width ; 
forefoot  length;  forefoot  width;  fore  toe  width,  (see  Figure  3  for  il- 
lustration of  foot  measurements)  ;  ear  height  from  notch  ;  and  ear  height 
from  crown.  A  summary  of  all  measurements  is  given  in  the  senior  au- 
thor's unpublished  M.  S.  thesis,  1973,  University  of  California, 
Berkeley. 

Sexual  dimorphism  in  size  among  the  bears  in  the  Trinity  study  area 
was  pronounced.  There  was  little  overlap  in  any  of  the  linear  measure- 
ments of  adult  males  and  females,  and  where  present  was  largely  at- 
tributed to  age  differences.  The  average  chest  girth  for  adult  male  bears 


10 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 


Black  color  phase 

r~^  Brown  color  phase 


FIGURE  4.     Color  composition  of  black  bear  populations  in  the  Pacific  northwest.  Data   largely 
from  Cowan,  1938. 

was  41.7  (105.9  cm)  inches  compared  to  34.5  (87.6  cm)  inches  for  adult 
female  bears.  Size  dimorphism  apparently  starts  soon  after  birth,  as 
yearlings  exhibited  a  size  difference  between  sexes. 

Adult  male  depredation  bears  averaged  larger  than  other  adult  male 
bears.  A  part  of  this  average  size  difference  was  probably  due  to  a 


BLACK    BEAR    STUDY 


11 


larger  percentage  of  older  males  in  the  depredation  sample  than  in  the 
wild  bear  sample. 

A  strong  positive  correlation  was  found  between  bear  weight  and 
composite  foot  measurements  (Figures  6  and  7).  The  log-log  form  of 
plotting  the  data  fit  well  to  a  straight  line  of  the  equation : 


FIGURE  6.      Foot  measurements  of  black  bears.  A    +    B    +    C    +    D-I-E+    F  gives  the  sum 
of  composite  foot  measurements  plotted  in    Figure  7. 

Log  (weight)  =  —  2.73  +  3.5  log  (sum  of  foot  measurements).  The 
correlation  coefficient  for  this  plot  is  0.974. 

Several  field  observations  showed  that  a  composite  foot  measurement 
sum  obtained  from  a  track  in  light  dust  was  about  10%  less  than  the 
true  sum,  obtained  from  the  animal.  Track  measurements  thus  might 
be  used  to  derive  rough  estimates  of  population  composition. 

Weights 

The  average  weight  of  the  adult  male  depredation  bear  is  more  than 
other  wild  males   (Table  1).  Bears  captured  in  the  fall  appeared  by 


12 


CALIFORNIA  FISH   AND  GAME 


C 
O 


o 

CD 


-r  \^\y 

/ 

o 

0     /     ° 

o        <^o°  o 

^8 

200  — 

oA° 

■        /   o 

■   y     o 

■   / 

o4o 

K 

100  — 

■f 

■ 

80- 

/         ° 

/     o 

60- 

40- 

/■                                 o-Males 

/                                        ■- Females 

30- 

o 

< 

> 

1                     1                 1 

20 


30 


Sum  of  composite  foot  measurements   (inches) 

FIGURE  7.      Correlation   of    body   weight   and   composite   foot   measurements   of  Trinity   County 
bears. 


visual  inspection  to  be  fatter  than  summer  captured  bears.  However,  no 
bear  captured  in  the  summer  was  recaptured  in  the  fall,  so  no  actual 
weight  gain  could  be  determined. 

Trinity  County  bears  are  similar  in  weight  to  those  reported  by 
Jonkel  and  Cowan  (1971)  in  Montana,  but  are  considerably  lighter  than 
those  found  in  the  eastern  United  States  (Table  2).  Because  some  of  the 
weights  given  for  the  eastern  states  are  probably  late  fall  weights,  it  is 
difficult  to  make  exact  comparisons.  Nevertheless,  it  seems  apparent  that 
Trinity  County  bears  are  smaller.  Of  149  bears  that  Black  (1958) 
handled  in  one  summer,  six  male  bears  exceeded  400  lb.  (181.6  kg)  with 


BLACK   BEAE    STUDY 


13 


the  largest  two  weighing  562  (255.1  kg)  and  599  lb.  (271.9  kg).  His 
maximum  weight  for  a  female  was  361  lb.  (163.9  kg).  None  of  the 
Trinity  bears  approach  these  figures.  The  largest  male,  weighed  324  lb. 
(147.1  kg)  and  the  largest  female  162  lb.  (73.5  kg). 

TABLE  1.— Average  Weights  (pounds)  of  Trinity  County  Black  Bears,  1972 


Class 

No. 

Range 

X 

SD 

All  adult  males 

30 

8 
11 
2 
1 
3 
2 

116-324 

190-295 

112-162 

99-104 

87 

58-64 

43-44 

215.0 

243.6 

127.6 

101.5 

87.0 

61.0 

43.5 

55.0 

Depredation  adult  males 

Adult  females 

38.8 
18.0 

Sub-adult  males 

Sub-adult  females 

Male  yearlings 

Female  yearlings 

TABLE  2. — Average  Black  Bear  Weights  from  Several  Different  Localities 


Location 

Average  weights  (pounds) 

Adults 

Year- 
lings 

Source 

Males 

Females 

Cubs 

Jonkel  and  Cowan  (1971) 

Montana 

211 
304 
324 
276 
215 

125 
189 
200 
196 
128 

45 

94 
54 

22 

Harlow  (1961) 

Florida - 

Harlow  (1961)..         

New  Hampshire 

New  York 

Black  (1958) 

38 

This  study..   ... 

Trinity  County 

29 

LIFE  HISTORY 
Summer  Movements  and  Home  Range 

Recaptures  and  radio  locations  of  13  bears  (6  males  and  7  female) 
yielded  data  on  summer  movements.  All  movements  were  computed  as 
minimum  linear  distances  between  known  location  points.  The  average 
movement  shown  by  male  bears  was  1.7  miles  (2.7  km),  while  for 
females  the  average  was  2.0  miles  (3.2  km).  The  overall  average  summer 
movement  was  1.9  (3.1  km)  miles,  both  sexes  included.  The  maximum 
movement  recorded  by  recapture  was  2.8  miles  (4.5  km).  During  sum- 
mer, the  maximum  distances  moved  by  three  radio-collared  bears  were 
2.2  (3.5  km),  3.0  (4.8  km)  and  4.5  miles  (7.2  km).  The  average  maxi- 
mum number  of  days  between  known  locations  for  bears  showing  move- 
ment was  24.5  days. 

Trapsites  were  not  located  in  such  a  pattern  or  in  adequate  numbers 
that  a  reliable  home  range  size  could  be  plotted  on  the  basis  of  recap- 
tures alone.  However,  two  radio-collared  bears — number  10,  an  adult 
male,  and  number  61,  an  adult  female  with  cubs — were  located  fre- 


14 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 


quently  enough  to  enable  an  accurate  estimation  of  their  summer  home 
range  (Figure  8).  A  third  bear,  number  14,  an  adult  female,  was  located 
only  a  few  times  before  losing  her  collar. 


FIGURE  8.      Movements  of  three  Trinity  County  bears  fitted  with  radio  collars. 

Bear  number  10  was  located  20  times  over  56  days  in  an  area  of  less 
than  5  square  miles  (12.9  km-)  before  he  moved  a  distance  of  approxi- 
mately 7  miles  (11.3  km)  from  his  summer  range.  The  latter  movement 
was  considered  a  seasonal  migration.  Bear  number  61  was  located  six 
times  over  a  period  of  15  days  in  an  area  of  less  than  7  square  miles 


BLACK   BEAR   STUDY  15 

(18.1  km^).  Bear  number  14  was  located  four  times  in  a  period  of  28 
days  in  an  area  of  less  than  4  square  miles  (10.4  km^).  Her  collar  was 
then  recovered  23  days  after  the  last  known  location  approximately  3.5 
miles  (5.6  km)  from  the  center  of  the  area  of  her  previously  known 
locations. 

From  these  data,  summer  home  ranges  were  estimated  to  be  fairly 


FIGURE  9.  Seasonal  movements  of  Trinity  County  bears  as  shown  by  recapture,  sighting, 
and  hunter  kill.  One  kill  site  (SW  corner)  was  actually  7  miles  (11.3  km)  farther 
to  the  Southwest,  ofF  the  map. 


16 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 


small,  most  being  approximately  5  (12.9  km-)  to  10  square  miles  (25.9 
km-)  in  size.  Summer  home  range  size  did  not  appear  to  be  different- 
iated by  sex  or  age  class. 

Fall  Movements 

On  the  basis  of  radio  collar  locations,  sightings,  trapping,  and  hunter 
tag  returns,  fall  movements  of  10  bears  were  known  (Figure  9).  The 
average  movement  of  nine  bears  trapped  in  the  s\immer  and  located  in 
the  fall  was  6.1  miles  (9.8  km)  from  the  original  summer  capture  site. 
Movements  fell  into  two  distinct  categories. 

Four  of  the  bears  apparently  had  not,  at  the  time  of  the  fall  location, 
left  or  moved  far  from  their  summer  home  range.  Eadio-collar  bear 
number  61,  a  female  with  cubs,  stayed  in  the  area  of  her  summer  home 
range  until  she  was  shot  on  October  18.  On  October  17,  an  adult  female 
with  a  cub  was  sighted  2.0  miles  (3.2  km)  from  her  capture  site  of 
September  1.  On  September  23,  an  adult  male  was  shot  illegally  1.5 
miles  (2.4  km)  from  his  original  summer  (July  25)  capture  site. 

On  October  24,  a  yearling  female  was  sighted  0.5  miles  (.8  km)  from 
her  original  summer  (July  26)  point  of  capture.  It  is  not  known  if  any 
of  these  bears  would  have  moved  or  did  move  from  their  summer  home 
ranges  later  in  the  fall. 

The  other  five  bears,  captured  in  the  summer  and  located  in  the  fall, 
were  found  an  average  of  9.0  miles  (14.5  km)  from  their  original  cap- 
ture site.  These  fall  locations  were  determined  between  September  11 
and  November  4.  Eadio-coUared  bear  number  10  moved  from  his  sum- 
mer home  range  and  then  stayed  on  a  small  fall  home  range  for  at  least 
30  days  (Figure  8).  It  is  not  known  whether  other  bears  located  a 
relatively  large  distance  from  their  original  capture  sites  were  staying 
in  a  newly  defined  home  range  or  were  wandering. 

In  summary,  average  fall  movements  were  greater  than  average  sum- 
mer movements,  but  not  all  of  the  animals  moved  from  their  summer 
home  ranges. 

Comparison  With  Other  Studies  of  Black  Bear  Mobility 

Movement  data  from  other  reports  (Table  3)  show  two  important 
trends  in  bear  movement  habits.  First,  most  studies  report  a  larger 
average  movement  in  the  faU  than  in  the  summer.  And  second,  male 
bears  show  larger  average  movement  than  females. 

TABLE  3. — Average  Movements  of  Black  Bears  According  to  Season  and  Sex 


Minimum  average  movement  (miles) 

Summer 

Fall 

All  year 

Location  and  source 

Males 

Females 

Michigan — Erickson  and  Petrides  (1964).. 

Montana — Jonkel  and  Cowan  (1971) 

Virginia — Stickley  (1961) 

2.1 

1.3 
1.85 

6.7 

7.6 
6.10 

5.4 
3.9 
10.0 
3.67 

1.4 
1.6 
1.8 

Trinity  County  (1972) ... 

3.13 

BLACK   BEAR   STUDY  17 

A  greater  average  movement  in  the  fall  suggests  an  extension  of  the 
summer  home  range,  or  movement  to  a  different  fall  home  range,  or 
possibly  fall  nomadism.  Increased  fall  movement  can  be  a  result  of 
bears  taking  advantage  of  local  food  abundance  (Spencer  1955).  In 
Montana,  Jonkel  and  Cowan  (1971)  reported  that  throughout  the  year 
a  small  home  range  was  used  by  all  bears,  except  transient  sub-adults. 
They  believed  that  the  large  diversity  of  climate,  topography  and  veg- 
etation in  a  small  area  made  it  possible  for  bears  in  the  Montana  area 
to  maintain  small  yearly  home  ranges. 

In  this  study,  bears  seemed  to  have  an  extremely  small  summer  home 
range,  but  part  of  the  population  moved  in  fall  to  new  food  supplies. 
By  the  latter  half  of  September  the  supply  of  manzanita  berries,  the 
major  summer  food,  had  been  exhausted  in  the  summer  trapping  area. 
There  appeared  to  be  no  mast  crops,  berry  crops,  or  other  easily  avail- 
able or  plentiful  food  sources  in  the  area  to  replace  manzanita  berries. 
There  were  plentiful  food  sources  in  the  form  of  spawning  salmon, 
acorn  crops  and  manzanita  berries  in  the  areas  to  which  bears  were 
known  to  move. 

Despite  poor  food  conditions  a  segment  of  the  study  population  did 
not  move  far  from  their  summer  home  range,  or  possibly  they  moved 
later  in  the  fall.  That  portion  of  the  study  population  that  stayed 
close  to  their  summer  home  range  was  largely  made  up  of  sows  with 
cubs  or  immature  bears.  Sows  with  cubs  are  generally  expected  to  stay 
on  small  home  ranges.  Jonkel  and  Cowan  (1971)  reported  that  dis- 
persal was  pronounced  in  yearling  bears  in  Montana.  However,  there 
was  no  evidence  that  this  was  the  case  with  yearling  bears  in  the 
Trinity  study  area. 

Contrary  to  other  reports,  movement  data  from  the  Trinity  study 
area  were  not  clearly  differentiated  according  to  sex.  The  average  max- 
imum known  summer  movement  of  females  was  slightly  greater  than 
that  of  males.  However,  it  appears  that  adult  females  with  cubs  make 
significantly  shorter  fall  movements  than  either  lone  adult  females  or 
adult  males. 

Food  Habits 

Seats  were  collected  from  July  through  October  of  1972.  All  scat 
samples  were  analyzed,  most  in  the  dry  state,  at  the  California  Fish 
and  Game  laboratory. 

Scat  samples  usually  were  not  collected  unless  they  could  be  dated 
to  within  approximately  a  week.  During  July  and  August  most  samples 
were  collected  along  roads,  around  trapsites  and  bait  stations,  and  from 
traps  during  regular  trapping  activities.  Trap  bait  did  not  appear  in 
scats  taken  from  traps.  All  of  the  samples  in  July  and  August  came 
from  the  summer  trapping  area.  In  September  and  October  a  system 
of  trails  and  roads  was  checked  periodically  for  scats.  Part  of  this 
system  was  within  the  summer  trapping  area.  The  remainder  was 
around  Lewiston  Lake,  in  an  area  with  a  high  proportion  of  Manzanita 
thickets  and  oak  woodland. 

Table  4  summarizes  the  major  food  items  found  in  106  scat  samples. 
Volumes  of  food  items  were  estimated,  but  because  volume  composition 
in  a  scat  is  not  necessarily  indicative  of  the  volume  eaten,  final  data 


18  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

"were  expressed  in  terms  of  frequency  of  occurrence,  with  general  vol- 
ume trands  noted.  These  data  are  presented  only  as  a  food  index  and 
a  supplement  to  other  data  in  the  study. 

Many  of  the  September  and  October  samples  came  from  a  king 
salmon  [Oncorhxjnclxus  tshawtscha)  spawning  area  on  the  Trinity 
River  near  the  breast  of  Lewiston  Dam.  Although  bears  were  seen 
feeding  on  salmon,  scats  dropped  in  the  area  contained  mostly  acorns 
and  manzanita  berries  apparently  eaten  in  the  surrounding  area. 

Bears  in  the  study  area  depended  primarily  on  manzanita  berries 
from  July  through  August  (Table  4).  Thirty  four  of  35  scat  samples 
contained  manzanita  berries,  and  a  large  majority  of  these  samples 
were  essentially  100%  manzanita  berries  with  other  items  in  trace 
amounts.  Grasses  and  forbs  were  the  next  most  common  food  item  in 
July  and  August,  but  they  were  a  relatively  small  volume  of  the 
samples  in  which  they  occurred.  Dogwood  seed  occurred  in  14%  of  the 
August  scats,  usually  as  a  major  volume  item. 

In  September  and  October  manzanita  berries  remained  a  major  food. 
By  late  September  and  into  October  acorns  became  a  dominant  food 
item  in  the  Lewiston  Lake  area.  Although  acorns  were  found  in  38% 
of  the  October  scats,  none  occurred  in  any  of  the  scats  from  the  summer 
trapping  area.  Grasses  and  forbes  continued  to  be  found  frequently  but 
in  small  amounts. 

Deer  hair  was  found  in  5  of  106  samples. 

Reproduction 

Of  all  adult  female  bears  examined  during  the  summer  trapping 
period,  two  were  in  estrus.  These  bears  were  captured  on  July  17  and 
July  18.  Of  three  adult  female  bears  captured  after  July  18  that  were 
believed  to  be  without  cubs,  none  were  observed  in  heat.  The  beginning 
of  the  breeding  season  could  not  be  estimated  because  trapping  did  not 
begin  until  the  last  week  in  June. 

Four  of  the  11  adult  females  captured  (36%)  were  known  to  have  a 
litter  of  the  year.  Three  of  these  litters  were  either  handled  or  seen. 
The  other  litter  was  not  observed  during  the  handling  of  the  mother, 
but  was  sighted  with  the  mother  several  weeks  later.  Two  other  females 
unaccompanied  by  cubs  during  capture  were  lactating. 

The  average  litter  size  in  Trinity  County  was  1.67  cubs,  based  on  six 
litters  handled  or  seen. 

The  female  black  bear  has  seasonally  constant  estrus  with  ovulation 
induced  following  mating.  The  mating  season  can  vary  but  usually 
occurs  during  June  and  July  (Erickson  and  Nellor  1964).  Grinnell 
et  al.  (1937)  reported  a  pair  of  California  black  bears  mating  on  June 
25.  Of  eight  females  trapped  by  Stickley  (1961)  in  Virginia  in  one 
summer,  three  were  in  heat  in  June,  three  in  July  and  two  in  August. 
Jonkel  and  Cowan  (1971)  found  in  Montana  that  bears  were  in  estrus 
as  early  as  May  25  and  as  late  as  August  10,  with  a  peak  in  June.  Data 
indicated  that  most  mating  in  Trinity  County  is  over  by  mid-July. 

Black  bear  litters  seem  to  run  slightly  over  two  cubs  in  the  eastern 
United  States.  Average  litter  size  was  reported  as  2.4  in  Maine  (Spencer 
1955),  2.2  in  Florida  (Harlow  1961)  and  2.15  in  Michigan  (Erickson 
1964).  In  the  western  United  States  reported  average  litter  size  is 
usually  below  two  cubs.  Average  cubs  per  litter  has  been  reported  as 


BLACK    BEAR   STUDY 


19 


« 

o 


"9 

e 


^    M 


— 

e 

• 

3 

o 

0 

e 

E 

V 

0 

u 

k 

« 

3 

u 

w 

e 

w 

k 

0 

^ 

«^ 

c 

0 

s 

X 

X 

^ 

w 

« 

C 

k 

V 

0 

3 

E 

o- 

« 

0) 

k 

k 

«*• 

01 

M 

^ 

3 

w 
41 

Tl    CI 


Ik     U 

=■    W 

O 

rj  01 

0 

^£ 
M 

o  B 
U   k 

o 

II 

W  sP 

si 

u 
«  ^ 

«k  s 


e  lA 
u  S 
■»^ 
Ik  k 

0) 

a  E 

it 


Ul 
GO 
< 


M 


^ 

fe 


^ 

fe 


^ 

fe 


^ 


^ 

fe 


T3 
O 
O 


o  to  o  o 


^  t^  lO  t^ 

OS  CO   C^  CO 


I  CO 

I      • 

IN 


O  O  O  CD 


cot^o^-^r^t^t^Tfoo 


COCOt^rt|>fOCOfOI>-* 

oi  <X)  CO  "-I  i-H 


CO  00  O  CO  M 

(N    ■-I    rH 


rH    (N    -^ 


*  *  * 

CO  lO  o> 


CO   r^   t^ 

05  CO  CO 


*  * 

I  00  ■* 


00  o 


I    Tj<    >-l 


* 

o  t^  o 


O  CO  o 
O  CD  O 


1  O  CD 


O  CD 


CO  rtH  CD 


1  CO  ^ 


C3 


c3    « 


CO 

S 


=8 

-4^ 

6 

01 

V   d 

-^:> 

>    c3 

TI     N 

Wl 

«     C 

■^■1 

■**    o3 

ffS 

o 

> 

_   o 

Jo  - 

si/ 


O     O 


6«= 


D.  O,  o, 

<n  m  m 

S  §  g 

«  o  » 

S  !-  « 

(4-1   aj  ^  73 

a!   M  a>  <u 

<D    oj  01  o 

^  "t;  to  m 

OJ    S  01  0) 


o  o  CO  00 

CD  CD  M<  CO 


1  00 

o 


t^  t^  (N  CO      1  CO 


OO 


t^    t^ 


CO      I  CI  (N      1 


(M      1  -"tl  00      I 
t^         CO  CO 


IC  I    >-l    Tjl 


t-  CO      I  t^  CO 


CD  CO 
CD  "-I 


CO  CO 
CD  CO 


Tj*    1-1 


Tj*    IN        I 


03 
Q, 
=! 
P. 

-a 

G 
03 


a 

« 

<u 

O 
O 

o 


•-  •*    O    m 
—    -___^c3i-i<u 


+J  -u  -^ 

a  a   u 

OJ  o    o 

en  to    m 

I— I  I— I  (— I 


01 
Q.CC 
to- 

C    bC 

3' 
.   01 

^  o 


r5  <-- 


J-    01 

aj   01  .2 


CO 


20  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

1.68  in  Idaho  (Kiist  1946),  1.8  in  Yellowstone  National  Park  (Bray 
1967)  and  1.6  in  Montana  (Jonkel  and  Co-wan  1971).  Although  the 
sample  was  small  in  Trinity  County  the  average  litter  size  of  1.67  com- 
pares closely  with  other  areas  in  the  West. 

POPULATION  CHARACTERISTICS 
Density 

Thirty-eight  bears,  which  included  two  cubs,  were  trapped  and  tagged 
in  the  main  part  of  the  summer  trapping  area.  In  addition,  four  cubs 
were  known  to  accompany  three  sows  which  were  tagged.  The  average 
radius  of  movement  for  bears  in  the  summer  trapping  area  was  1.85 
miles  (2.9  km).  If  it  is  assumed  that  on  the  average  bears  were  drawn 
a  maximum  of  1.85  miles  from  a  trapsite,  then  the  trapping  covered  an 
area  of  44  square  miles  (113.9  km-).  If  no  emigration  took  place  during 
the  summer,  the  minimum  density  of  the  marked  population  in  the  main 
summer  trapping  area  was  42  bears  on  44  square  miles  or  approxi- 
mately one  bear  per  square  mile  (2.6  km^).  This  computation  takes  no 
cognizance  of  the  unmarked  portion  of  the  population. 

Three  methods  were  used  to  estimate  the  total  population,  including 
marked  and  unmarked  animals.  Two  utilized  the  Lincoln  Index  method 
with  different  types  of  sampling;  the  other  fitted  the  frequencies  of 
capture  and  recapture  to  a  geometric  model. 

After  the  trapping  period  there  were  seven  sightings  of  individual 
bears  or  family  groups  in  the  main  summer  trapping  area.  Three  of 
these  were  marked.  Using  this  as  an  estimate  of  the  percentage  of  the 
total  population  marked  in  the  area,  it  can  be  calculated  that  there 
were  84  individual  bears  and  family  groups  in  the  area.  If  14%  of  the 
population  were  cubs  (see  section  on  population  structure)  then  the 
total  population  would  be  98  bears. 

If  August  29  is  arbitrarily  chosen  as  the  end  of  the  marking  period 
and  the  beginning  of  a  sampling  by  capture  period,  the  total  population 
based  on  capture-recapture  is  estimated  as  103  bears  using  a  simple 
Lincoln  Index. 

The  geometric  model  for  the  frequency  of  capture  distribution  (Ed- 
wards and  Eberhardt  1967)  uses  as  an  estimator  of  total  population 
the  equation, 

N  =  "^ 

1  -  (n/t) 

where  n  =  total  number  of  individuals  captured  and 

t    =  total  number  of  captures. 

Using  this  method  we  estimated  the  population  to  be  121  bears.  Edwards 
and  Eberhardt  believed  this  computation  gives  estimates  that  are 
slightly  high. 

Comparing  the  results  of  these  three  methods  of  determining  total 
population,  we  believe  that  a  conservative  estimate  of  the  total  popula- 
tion in  the  main  trapping  area  during  the  summer  of  1972  was  between 
80  and  90  bears.  This  Avould  be  a  density  of  roughly  two  bears  per 
square  mile.  It  is  thought  that  local  densities  in  the  trapping  area  may 
have  been  even  higher.  Of  42  known  bears  in  the  trapping  area,  31  were 
known  to  be  located  in  the  northern  half  of  the  area. 


BLACK    BEAR   STUDY  21 

Fall  densities  were  not  estimated  for  the  main  part  of  the  summer 
trapping  area  or  the  total  study  area.  From  the  decrease  in  bear  sign 
in  the  main  summer  trapping  area  after  mid-September  and  the  data 
on  fall  movement  patterns,  it  is  postulated  that  the  population  density 
in  the  main  summer  trapping  area  decreased  greatly  in  the  fall. 

Although  five  marked  bears  were  reported  shot  during  the  1972  bear 
season,  no  attempt  was  made  to  use  the  kill  of  marked  and  unmarked 
animals  to  estimate  a  fall  population  density-.  The  relatively  large  dis- 
persal movements  shown  by  three  of  the  marked  hunter-killed  bears 
would  make  it  very  difficult  to  determine  over  what  area  a  Lincoln 
Index  should  be  applied. 

Spencer  (1955)  used  a  cruise  line  method  to  calculate  a  density  for 
the  total  bear  range  in  Maine  of  one  bear  per  5.56  square  miles  (14.5 
km^).  In  Virginia,  Stickley  (1957),  cited  by  Bray  and  Barnes  (1967), 
distributed  questionnaires  to  game  wardens  and  estimated  the  black 
bear  density  to  be  one  per  3.9  square  miles  (10.1  km^).  In  Michigan, 
Erickson  and  Petrides  (1964)  calculated,  from  marked-unmarked  ratios 
among  hunter-killed  bears  in  their  study  area,  a  bear  densitj^  of  one 
per  3.4  square  miles  (8.8  km-),  although  the  researchers  considered  this 
calculated  density  to  be  low. 

In  the  "West,  in  that  part  of  Yellowstone  National  Park  studied  by 
Bray  (1967),  the  black  bear  density  was  estimated  to  be  one  per  5.2 
square  miles  (13.5  km-).  In  the  best  habitat  of  Bray's  study  the  density 
was  reported  as  one  per  1.4  square  miles  (3.6  km-).  In  Montana  in  the 
Bear  Creek  study  area  Jonkel  and  Cowan  (1971),  using  tagging  and 
observation  data,  estimated  the  bear  density  to  be  one  per  0.8  square 
mile  (2.1  km-)  in  1961.  After  increased  hunting  pressure  in  the  area, 
they  calculated  the  density  to  be  one  per  1.7  square  miles  (4.4  km^)  in 
1966.  In  Alberta,  Kemp  (1972)  reported  the  density  of  an  unhunted 
bear  population  as  one  bear  per  1.02  square  miles  (2.6  km^). 

The  estimated  summer  bear  density  in  the  summer  trapping  area  in 
Trinity  County  is  about  one  bear  per  0.5  square  miles  (1.3  km^)  which 
is  almost  twice  that  of  any  other  reported  in  the  literature.  Even  the 
absolute  minimum  density  of  one  marked  bear  per  square  mile  is  close 
to  the  highest  density  given  in  the  literature.  We  acknowledge  that 
this  may  represent  a  seasonal  concentration  that  could  vary  from  year 
to  year  with  shifting  availability  of  food. 

Sex  and  Age  Structure 

During  the  summer  trapping  period  the  sex  ratio  of  trapped  bears 
was  14  females  to  25  males,  or  36%  females  to  64%  males.  Statistically, 
this  ratio  was  not  significantly  different  at  the  5%  level  from  a  one- 
to-one  sex  ratio.  All  four  of  the  bears  captured  during  the  fall  trapping 
period  were  males.  Of  11  depredation  bears  tagged,  10  were  males.  Most 
previous  studies  have  shown  a  preponderance  of  males  in  trapped 
samples,  but  Kemp  (1972)  suggests  that  this  might  derive  from  the 
higher  mobility  of  males.  The  sex  ratio  of  88  hunter  killed  bears  in 
Trinity  County  during  the  1972-73  season  was  42%  females  to  58% 
males.  More  data  are  needed  to  verify  the  actual  sex  ratio  in  the  popu- 
lation. 

The  age  was  estimated  by  toothwear  and  body  size.  Cubs  and  yearlings 
were  accurately  classified.  For  analysis  purposes,  all  other  bears  were 
placed  in  a  combined  subadult  and  adult  classification.  For  the  known 


22 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 


population  of  43  bears,  the  general  age  structure  was  as  follows:  six 
cubs;  five  yearlings;  32  subadults  and  adults.  As  suggested  before,  there 
may  have  been  some  cubs  that  were  not  seen  that  belong  to  this  sample 
population. 

Table  5  summarizes  the  age  structure  of  other  black  bear  populations, 
in  comparison  with  that  found  in  the  Trinity  study  area.  The  age  struc- 
ture of  the  Trinity  population  was  almost  exactly  that  reported  for  a 
stable  unhunted  population  in  Alberta  (Kemp  1972).  It  is  also  very 
similar  to  that  of  a  slightly  decreasing  population  in  Montana  (Jonkel 
and  Cowan  1971).  Bears  in  the  Trinity  study  were  not  accurately 
aged  by  a  tooth  sectioning  technique,  so  no  calculation  of  mortality  rate 
according  to  age  class  can  be  derived. 

TABLE  5. — Age  structures  of  Several  Black  Bear  Populations 


Location  and  source 


Colorado — Bray    and    Barnes    (1967)    citing 

GUbert  (1951) 

Montana — Jonkel  and  Cowan  (1971) 

Virginia— Stickley  (1961) -  - 

Michigan — Erickson  and  Petrides  (1964) 

Alberta— Kemp  (1972) 

Trinity  County  (1972) 


Cubs 


No. 


44 
18 

2 
42 
21 

6 


% 


19 
12 
2 
36 
15 
14 


Yearlings 


No. 


53 

26 
27 
27 
18 
5 


% 


23 
17 
29 
23 
13 
12 


Older  bears 


No. 


133 

HI 

65 

48 

104 

32 


% 


58 
71 
69 
41 
72 
74 


Hunter  Caused  Mortality 

Five  of  the  54  bears  in  the  tagged  populations  were  killed  during  the 
hunting  season  from  October  14,  1972  to  January  1,  1973.  This  is  a  9% 
hunter  caused  mortality.  However,  if  we  exclude  the  tagged  depreda- 
tion bears,  which  were  scattered  throughout  the  county,  and  consider 
only  the  other  tagged  bears,  the  hunter  caused  mortality  was  five  of  43 
bears  or  almost  12%.  It  must  be  stressed  that  this  is  a  minimum 
estimate  since  the  hunting  kill  is  not  fully  reported  in  Trinity  County. 
The  reported  kill  in  the  county  was  88,  which  was  close  to  the  5  year 
average  of  91  bears,  from  1967-68  to  1972-73. 

Jonkel  and  Cowan  (1971)  reported  a  3%  hunter  kill  of  tagged  bears 
after  the  tirst  year  of  trapping.  This  increased  to  13%  the  following 
year  when  hunting  was  encouraged  in  the  area.  Erickson  and  Petrides 
(1964)  in  Michigan  reported  a  minimum  annual  mortality  rate  by  hunt- 
ing of  19%.  Stickley  (1961)  in  Virginia  found  that  hunters  took  33% 
of  his  tagged  bears  the  first  fall  after  tagging.  The  Trinity  County 
hunter  kill  percentage  of  12%  is  relatively  low  compared  to  these 
reported  figures,  but  as  mentioned  before  the  accuracy  of  this  figure 
is  in  doubt. 

DEPREDATION  BEARS 

Depredation  bears  are  such  a  distinctive  segment  of  the  total  bear 

population  that  a  separate  discussion  is  warranted.  Of  11  depredation 

bears  tagged,  nine  were  adult  males.  One  was  a  female  subadult  and 

one  was  a  yearling  male.  It  is  not  unusual  that  males  comprise  such  a 


BLACK   BEAR   STUDY  23 

high  percentage  of  the  depredation  bear  sample.  Black  (1958)  in  New 
York  found  that  of  bears  classified  as  dump  bears,  75%  were  males. 
Similarly,  Erickson  and  Petrides  (1964)  reported  that  84%  of  30 
captured  dump  bears  were  males. 

The  average  weight  of  adult  male  depredation  bears  (summer  cap- 
tured) was  larger  (243.6  lb.  [110.6  kg])  than  the  average  weight  of 
summer  captured  wild  bears  (198.9  lb.  [90.2  kg])  in  the  study.  Most 
of  the  depredation  adult  males  tagged  were  estimated  to  be  5  to  6  years 
old  or  older.  Manj-  of  the  wild  adult  male  bears  captured  were  estimated 
to  be  between  3  years  and  6  years  old.  Black  bears  have  been  reported 
as  not  attaining  full  body  growth  until  the  sixth  or  seventh  year  (Ger- 
stelll939). 

A  subadult  female  depredation  bear  captured  in  a  campground  on 
July  6  was  transplanted  14  miles  (22.5  km)  to  the  north.  By  late 
August  this  bear  had  moved  7  miles  (11.3  km)  southeast  and  has  become 
a  nuisance  around  a  housing  development  and  had  to  be  removed.  An 
adult  male  was  captured  at  a  private  dump  on  June  27  and  was  trans- 
planted approximately  25  miles  (40.2  km)  to  the  northeast.  Two  days 
later  a  tagged  bear  was  reported  seen  about  half  way  between  the  point 
of  capture  and  point  of  release.  On  July  5  he  was  sighted  and  iden- 
tified by  us  at  the  dump  where  he  was  originally  captured. 

In  Michigan,  of  19  bears  transplanted  an  average  of  39.7  miles 
(63.9  km)  only  two  showed  homing  behavior  (Erickson  and  Petrides 
1964).  However,  in  New  York,  Sauer  et  al.  (1969)  report  that  of  52 
bears  transferred  from  8.2  (13.2  km)  to  66.6  miles  (107.2  km)  from  the 
capture  site,  22  returned  to  the  vicinity  of  capture.  The  longest  distance 
from  which  a  bear  returned  to  its  home  range  was  56  miles  (90.1  km). 
Sauer  et  al.  thought  that  this  homing  behavior  was  not  due  to  a  homing 
instinct  but  rather  to  the  familiarity  of  many  bears  with  a  relatively 
large  area  around  their  home  range. 

The  dense  bear  population  in  the  summer  trapping  area  coexisted 
with  a  high  population  of  recreationists.  Yet,  in  1972  only  two  summer 
nuisance  bears  were  reported  in  campgrounds  although  bear  depreda- 
tion in  the  county  as  a  whole  was  high.  Summer  bear  nuisances  at  the 
resort  in  the  area  were  few  and  not  troublesome.  This  situation  might 
have  been  due  to  the  concentration  of  the  recreation  activity  along  the 
main  roads  and  around  the  lake  shore,  rather  than  being  scattered 
throughout  the  area.  However,  field  observations  and  radio  collar  loca- 
tions showed  that  it  was  not  unusual  for  bears  to  pass  within  a  few 
hundred  yards  of  campsites.  Yet,  few  recreationists  ever  sighted  a  bear 
in  the  area.  Some  were  surprised  to  learn  that  bears  were  common  in 
the  area. 

The  question  of  what  causes  a  bear  to  become  a  nuisance  is  a  complex 
one.  It  would  be  suspected  that  overcoming  a  fear  of  man  is  one  of  the 
major  factors.  Likewise,  natural  food  conditions  probably  infiuence  the 
incidence  of  nuisance  behavior.  Bear  trouble  in  the  Trinity  area  was 
low  in  the  summer  of  1972  when  manzanita  berries  were  plentiful.  In 
the  fall  when  bear  food  became  scarce  in  the  summer  trapping  area, 
bear  nuisance  reports  increased  for  a  time,  even  though  human  use  of 
the  area  had  greatly  decreased  and  it  was  thought  that  bear  density 
had  greatly  decreased.  This  leads  one  to  postulate  that  natural  food 
conditions  in  the  area  to  which  a  depredation  bear  is  transplanted  may 


24  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

be  a  major  factor  in  dotcrmininp:  whether  tliat  bear  becomes  a  nuisance 
bear  again. 

As  human  population  density  and  recreational  use  increase  in  Trinity 
County,  conflicts  between  bears  and  human  interests  will  increase.  More 
information  on  the  factors  which  cause  a  bear  to  become  a  nuisance 
bear  is  needed.  Also,  methods  of  handling  a  troublesome  bear  will  have 
to  be  improved  so  that  the  probability  of  nuisance  recurrence  by  the 
bear  will  remain  low. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  gratefully  acknowledge  aid  from  several  members  of  the  Califor- 
nia Department  of  Fish  and  Game,  including  Wallace  G.  Macgregor 
and  Dick  Weaver  who  provided  supervision  and  assistance  during  the 
field  work ;  Bruce  Browning  who  assisted  with  the  food  habits  study ; 
Walt  Stienecker  who  analyzed  most  of  the  seat  samples ;  Brian  Hunter 
and  Bill  Clark  who  trained  us  in  immobilization  techniques;  and  Herb 
Hagen  who  provided  assistance  with  radio  telemetry  equipment  and 
methods. 

Don  Foster  served  as  field  consultant  during  development  of  trap- 
ping techniques. 

Gene  Christman  of  the  Museum  of  Vertebrate  Zoology  prepared  the 
figures  for  this  publication. 

A.  Starker  Leopold  was  of  invaluable  help  in  the  preparation  of  the 
final  manuscript. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Black.   H.   C.     1958.     Black   bear   research   in   New   York.     Trans.   N.   Am.   Wildl. 

Conf.  23  :  443^61. 
Bray,  O.  E.     1967.     A  population  study  of  the  black  bear  in  Yellowstone  National 

Park.     M.  S.  Thesis.     Colorado  State  Univ.  102  p. 
Bray,  O.  E.,  and  V.  G.  Barnes.     1967.     A  literature  review  on  black  bear  popula- 
tions and  activities.     National  Park   Service  and  Colorado  Cooperative   Wildlife 

Research  Unit.  34  p. 
Cowan,   I.   M.     1938.     Geographic  distribution  of  color  phases  of  the   red   fox   and 

black  bear  in  the  Pacific  Northwest.     J.  Mammal.  19(2)  :  202-206. 
Edwards,  W.  R.,  and  L.  Eberhardt.     1967.     Estimating  cotton-tail  abundance  from 

live  trapping  data.     J.  Wildl.  Manage.  31  :  87-96. 
Erickson,  A.  W.     1964.     An  analysis  of  black  bear  kill  statistics  for  Michigan.     In 

The  black  bear  in  Michigan.     Mich.  St.  Univ.  Res.  Bull.  4:68-102. 
,   and   J.   E.   Nellor.     1964.     Breeding   biology    of   the   black   boar.     In     The 

black  bear  in  Michigan.     Mich.  St.  Univ.  Res.  Bull.  4:  1-45. 

-,  and  G.  A.  Petrides.     1964.     Population  structures,  movements  and  mortality 


of  tagged  black  bears  iu  Michigan.  In  The  black  bear  in  Michigan.  Mich.  St. 
Univ.  Res.  Bull.  4:46-67. 

Gilbert,  D.  L.  1951.  Economics  and  related  biology  of  the  black  bear  in  Colorado. 
M.  S.  Thesis.     Colorado  A.  and  M.  Coll.  164  p. 

Gerstell,  R.  1939.  The  growth  and  size  of  Pennsylvania  black  bears.  Pa.  Game 
News.  10(8)  :  4-7. 

Grinnell,  J.,  J.  S.  Dixon,  and  J.  M.  Linsdale.  1937.  Furbearing  mammals  of 
California.     Vol.  1.     Univ.  Calif.  Press.  Berkeley,  Calif.  377  p. 

Harlow,  R.  F.  1961.  Characteristics  and  status  of  Florida  black  bear.  Trans. 
N.  Am.  Wildl.  Nat.  Res.  Conf.  26  :  481-495. 

Jonkel,  C.  J.,  and  I.  McT.  Cowan.  1971.  The  black  bear  in  the  spruce-fir  forest. 
Wildlife  Monogr.  27  :  1-57. 

Kemp,  G.  A.  1972.  Black  bear  population  dynamics  at  Cold  Lake,  Alberta,  1968- 
70.  In  Bears,  their  biology  and  management.  Ed.  by  S.  Herrero.  Interna- 
tional Union  for  Conservation  of  Nature  and  Natural  Resources,  Merges,  Switzer- 
land, p.  26-31. 


BLACK   BEAR   STUDY  25 

Munz,   P.  A.,   and   D.   P.   Keck.     1959.     A   California   Flora.     Univ.   Calif.   Press. 

Berkeley,  Calif.  681  p. 
Pennsylvania    Game    Commission.     1952.     The    black    bear    in    Pennsylvania.    Pa. 

Game  News  23(4)  :  11-18. 
Rust,  H.  J.     1946.     Mammals  of  northern  Idaho.     J.  Mammal.  27(4)  :  308-327. 
Sauer,  P.  R.,   S.  L.   Free,   and   S.   D.   Brown.     1969.     Movements  of  tagged   bears 

in  the  Adirondacks.     N.  Y.  Fish  and  Game  J.  16(2)  :  205-223. 
Spencer,  H.  E.,  Jr.     1955.     The  black  bear  and  its  status  in  Maine.     Maine  Dept. 

Inl.  Fish.  Game.  Bull.  4 :  1-55. 
Stickley,  A.   R.,  Jr.     1957.     The   status   and   characteristics   of   the   black   bear   in 

Virginia.     M.  S.  Thesis.     Virginia  Polytechnic  Inst.  141  p. 
.     1961.     A  black  bear  tagging  study  in  Virginia.     Proc.  Ann.  Conf.   S.   E. 

Assoc.  Game  Fish  Comm.  15 :  43-54. 


Calif.  Fish  and  Game  61(1)  :  26-34.     1975. 


EARLY  LARVAE  OF  THE  DIAMOND  TURBOT, 
HYPSOPSETTA  GUTTULATA^ 

MAXWELL  B.  ELDRIDGE 

National  Marine  Fisheries  Service 

Tiburon  Fisheries  Laboratory 

A  developmental  series  of  larvae  of  Hypsopsetta  guttulata  collected 
in  Son  Francisco  Bay  is  described.  These  larvae  are  very  similar  to 
Pleuronichthys  turbots  and  distinguishing  characters  which  separate 
larval  forms  of  Hypsopsetta  from  Pleuronichthys  are  discussed.  Occur- 
rences of  H.  guttulata  eggs  and  larvae  indicate  an  extended  spawn- 
ing  period   from   early  June  through   mid-October. 

INTRODUCTION 

The  most  abundant  pleuronectid  larva  collected  to  date  in  a  current 
study  of  the  fish  eggs  and  larvae  of  Richardson  Bay,  California,  pre- 
sented a  problem.  At  first  the  larvae,  especially  the  specimens  with 
the  yolk-sac  absorbed,  appeared  to  be  one  of  the  Pleuronichthys  species, 
of  which  two  (P.  decurrens  and  P.  verticalis)  were  known  to  be  in  the 
San  Francisco  Bay.  Many  identifying  characters  for  Pleuronichthys 
spp.  established  by  Budd  (1940),  however,  did  not  agree  with  my  speci- 
mens. The  most  obvious  were  the  small  size  of  yolk-sac  larvae  and  the 
presence  of  oil  globules  in  the  yolk.  The  dilemma  was  presented  to  E.  H. 
Ahlstrom  of  the  NMFS  Southwest  Fisheries  Center,  who  was  able  to 
identify  the  series  of  specimens  as  larvae  of  the  diamond  turbot, 
Hypsopsetta  guttulata. 

The  diamond  turbot  is  not  tabulated  separately  in  commercial  land- 
ings but  is  included  with  turbots  of  the  genus  Pleuronichthys.  Together 
they  constitute  a  minor  part  of  the  commercial  catch.  The  diamond 
turbot  is  often  caught  by  coastal  sport  fishermen.  This  reflects  the  fish's 
habitat;  it  is  commonly  found  in  shallow  bays  and  tidal  flats  and  on 
muddy  or  sandy  bottoms  (Baxter  1960).  This  species  ranges  from  Cape 
Mendocino  to  Cape  San  Lucas,  Baja  California,  and  in  the  Gulf  of 
California.  The  larval  specimens  described  herein  are  from  the  northern 
extent  of  the  range  of  H.  guttulata  but  early  records  (Jordan  and  Gil- 
bert 1880)  show  that  it  has  long  been  a  resident  of  San  Francisco  Bay. 
Compared  to  the  Pleuronichthys  turbots,  little  is  known  of  the  life 
history  of  the  diamond  turbot,  especially  its  reproductive  habits. 

Limbaugh  (1955)  stated  that  the  pelagic  eggs  are  released  during 
summer  and  fall.  Eggs  from  running  ripe  diamond  turbots  were  taken 
by  Limbaugh  during  the  summer  and  similar  eggs  were  taken  repeatedly 
in  plankton  collections  made  off  the  Scripps  Institution  of  Ocean- 
ography pier  during  the  summer  of  1952  (Orton  and  Limbaugh  1953). 

The  purpose  of  this  paper  is  to  describe  the  early  life  history  stages 
of  H.  guttulata  and  to  give  characters  that  Avill  readily  separate  it  from 
the  larvae  of  the  two  Pleuronichthys  species  whose  adults  occur  in  San 
Francisco  Bay.  The  description  is  handicapped  by  the  lack  of  a  complete 
developmental  series.  There  were  no  specimens  obtained  between  5.8  mm 

1  Accepted  for  publication  July  1974. 

(26) 


DIAMOND  TURBOT  LARVAE  27 

and  11.4  mm  (0.23  and  0.45  inch).  Therefore,  the  study  concentrates  on 
the  younger  larvae.  Juvenile  and  adult  specimens  used  in  this  study 
were  obtained  from  field  collections  in  San  Francisco  Bay  and  from  the 
collection  of  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences. 

METHODS 

The  larval  specimens  used  for  this  description  were  collected  in 
Richardson  Bay,  California,  which  is  an  approximate  11.0  km^  (4.25 
mile-)  shallow  embayment  located  immediately  to  the  north  of  the  en- 
trance to  and  within  San  Francisco  Bay.  Two  methods  were  used  to 
catch  the  diamond  turbot.  A  standard  0.5  meter  plankton  net  was  towed 
at  randomly  selected  stations  throughout  Richardson  Bay,  and  two  sta- 
tionary channel  nets,  modified  from  a  design  of  Lewis,  et  al  (1970), 
were  fished  simultaneously.  One  channel  net  was  positioned  midway  up 
the  Bay  and  the  other  near  the  entrance  to  the  Bay.  All  nets  had  a  mesh 
aperture  size  of  333  micra. 

A  total  of  135  specimens  were  examined  in  this  study,  95  of  which 
were  larvae.  The  larvae  were  preserved  in  5%  buffered  formalin,  while 
the  juvenile  and  adult  fish  were  preserved  in  40%  isopropyl  alcohol. 
Morphometric  measurements  followed  those  described  by  Ahlstrom  and 
Ball  (1954)  and  were  made  with  an  ocular  micrometer.  I  selected  the 
illustrated  specimens  to  represent  stages  of  development.  The  illustra- 
tions are  literal,  drawn  by  means  of  a  camera  lucida. 

The  meristic  data  were  taken  from  either  specimens  stained  with 
alizarin  or  from  x-ray  photographs. 

The  following  description  is  organized  by  character  according  to  the 
approach  used  by  Ahlstrom  and  Ball  (1954).  Each  character  is  fol- 
lowed through  its  development.  Pigmentation  is  presented  first  followed 
by  morphology  and  meristics. 

PIGMENTATION 

The  discussion  on  pigmentation  is  limited  to  those  melanophores 
visible  in  the  preserved  specimens.  It  is  possible  other  body  pigments 
are  present  in  diamond  turbot  larvae  but  are  lost  in  formalin  preserva- 
tion. The  pigmentation  varied  within  any  given  size  class  as  might  be 
expected  for  a  species  with  heavy  pigmentation.  Throughout  the  entire 
series  the  larvae  exhibited  generally  heavy  body  pigmentation  on  the 
anterior  f 's  of  the  body  of  yolk-sac  larvae  and  extending  f's  of  the 
body  length  in  5  mm  larvae.  The  most  notable  variation  in  pigment 
was  the  range  of  development  of  patches  of  scattered  fine  melanophores 
located  along  the  dorsal  and  ventral  midlines  posterior  to  the  anus.  In 
younger  forms,  these  patches  ranged  from  barely  detectable  spots  on 
the  bases  of  the  finfolds  to  occasionally  a  definite  triangular  patch  in 
one  or  both  finfolds.  The  older  larvae  did  not  exhibit  any  patches  ex- 
tending onto  the  finfold,  but  dark  strips  of  fine  spots  were  clearly 
visible. 

Newly  hatched  larvae  (Figure  la)  completely  lacked  eye  pigment. 
The  head  and  body  were  pigmented.  The  head  melanophores  were  dis- 
crete stellate  units  while  the  body  exhibited  fine  stippling  at  50  x 
magnification.  The  yolk-sac  was  devoid  of  pigment  except  for  ap- 
proximately 10-15  stellate  melanophores  on  the  surface  of  the  large  oil 
globule. 


28 


CALIFORNIA  FISH   AND  GAME 


B 


FIGURE    1.      Diamond  turbot.  A,  1.7  mm;  B,  212  mm;  C,  216  mm. 


As  the  yolk  was  absorbed  and  the  put  became  functional,  the  pigment 
spread  ventrally  over  the  yolk-sac.  The  hindgut  enlarged  and  pigment 
was  seen  over  its  ventral  flexion  to  the  anus.  Melanophores  persisted  on 
the  oil  globule.  An  interconnecting  network  of  stellate  melanophores 
Avas  present  over  most  of  the  anterior  half  of  the  body.  The  postanal 
patches  on  the  dorsal  and  ventral  midlines  were  now  visible.  In  most 
specimens  these  were  seen  only  as  intensification  of  the  fine  pigment 
spots  near  the  base  of  the  finfold. 

Eye  pigmentation  developed  along  the  dorsal  rim  of  the  eye  (Figure 
lb).  There  was  still  some  yolk  visible  at  this  stage  and  the  mouth  was 
well  developed  with  up  to  10  stellate  melanophores  along  the  margin  of 


DIAMOND    TURBOT   LARVAE 


29 


the  dentary.  The  past-anal  patches  lessened  in  size  in  larger  specimens 
and  were  routinely  seen  as  concentrations  of  midline  pigment  (Figure 
Ic).  The  body  became  covered  with  discrete  large  stellate  melanophores. 
Several  spots  were  also  visible  in  the  isthmus.  This  general  pattern  con- 
tinued into  larger  specimens  (Figure  2a). 


B 


FIGURE  2.     Diamond  turbot  larvae.  A,  3.8  mm;  B,  4.9  mm;  C,  5.8  mm. 


The  more  developed  larvae  around  4.0  to  4.9  mm  w^ere  distinguished 
by  the  elongate  patches  which  now  were  densely  pigmented  but  still 
confined  to  the  base  of  the  developing  vertical  fin  anlage.  The  head  had 
less  surface  pigment  spots  but  imbedded  melanophores  were  visible, 
especially  at  the  nape. 


30  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

The  metamorphosing  harvae  (Figure  2c)  continued  these  pigment 
patterns.  Tlie  median  patches  -were  more  extensive,  spreading  onto  the 
pterygiophore  bases  of  the  dorsal  and  anal  fins.  The  specimens  at  this 
stage  of  development  presented  different  appearances  depending  on 
the  extent  of  expansion  or  contraction  of  the  melanophores.  Almost 
the  entire  body  exclusive  of  the  outer  fin  margins  and  the  posterior 
portion  of  the  body  was  covered  Avith  stellate  melanophores. 

Meristic  characters  easily  distinguish  metamorphosed  juveniles.  These 
characters  are  presented  in  Table  1.  All  juvenile  specimens  had  a  total 
of  35  vertebrae ;  12  abdominal  and  23  caudal.  The  dorsal  fin  averaged 
71  rays  and  the  anal  fin  50  rays.  The  caudal  fin  averaged  19  rays.  The 
eyed  side  was  densely  pigmented  over  the  entire  body.  Dark  spots  were 
scattered  on  both  sides  and  ended  prior  to  the  caudal  penduncle.  Pig- 
ment extended  onto  the  vertical  fins. 

MORPHOMETRY  AND  MERISTICS 

The  newly  hatched  larvae  averaged  1.6  mm  (0.063  inch)  standard 
length  (s.L.)  and  appeared  deep  bodied  because  of  the  large  yolk-sac. 
The  oval  shaped  yolk-sac  contained  unsegmented  yolk  with  numerous 
oil  globules,  the  largest  positioned  to  the  rear  of  the  yolk-sac.  The  single 
large  oil  globules  averaged  0.14  mm  (0.005  inch)  in  diameter.  As  the 
yolk  was  absorbed,  the  yolk-sac  appeared  more  ovate  and  the  head  and 
hindgut  more  outlined.  By  approximately  2.2  mm  (0.087  inch)  s.L.,  the 
yolk  was  more  than  ^  absorbed.  The  oil  globule  now  averaged  around 
0.06  mm  (0.002  inch).  Larvae  ranging  2.3  to  2.4  mm  (0.090  to  0.094 
inch)  had  consumed  nearly  all  their  yolk. 

As  the  yolk  was  consumed,  the  gut  and  mouth  became  more  de- 
veloped. Newly  hatched  larvae  had  no  functional  mouth  and  the  hind- 
gut  leading  to  the  anus  appeared  as  a  thin  transparent  tube  extending 
ventrally  through  the  finfold.  Gut  development  was  most  evident  in  the 
bulging  or  enlargement  proceeding  ventrallj'  to  the  anus,  accompanied 
by  heavy  gut  pigmentation.  By  2.3-2.4  mm  (0.090  to  0.094  inch)  s.L., 
the  gut  was  functional  and  food  was  seen  in  the  intestine.  In  general, 
the  gut  length  shortened  relative  to  body  length  in  the  larvae ;  at 
metamorphosis  the  snout  to  anus  length  was  approximately  35%  s.L. 
(Figures). 

Body  shape  became  more  fusiform  as  yolk  absorption  progressed. 
Some  specimens  slightly  hunched  over  the  yolk-sac,  but  this  disappeared 
with  yolk  absorption.  With  the  thickening  of  the  gut,  the  development 
of  the  mouth  and  enlargement  of  the  head,  the  body  deepened  in  rela- 
tion to  its  length  (Figure  3).  The  specimens  around  3.8  mm  to  4.9  mm 
began  to  exhibit  the  compressed  flatfish  form.  The  illustrated  larvae 
display  the  gradual  rotation  of  the  gut  anteroventrally  with  a  character- 
istic sag  to  the  stomach.  The  metamorphic  specimens  had  a  rounded 
appearance  to  the  gut.  Their  bodies  were  more  compressed.  Throughout 
the  developmental  series  the  myomeres  were  difficult  to  see  mostly 
because  of  the  intense  pigmentation. 

The  head  of  the  hatchling  showed  a  midbrain  bulge  separated  from 
forebrain  and  medulla  which  is  typical  of  many  pleuronectid  larvae. 
By  2.4  mm,  it  appeared  as  a  large  dome  which  continued  throughout 
the  series.  The  fore  and  hindbrain  sections  could  be  seen  also  at  these 
sizes.  The  head  increased  in  overall  relative  size  throughout  develop- 
ment finally   reaching  approximately  ^  of  the  body  length,  then  it 


DIAMOND  TURBOT  LABVAE 


31 


"a 

C 

CO 

.a 

0) 

V 

0 

^ 

"oa 

1 

S, 

1^ 

lOCDN^O—it^N 

2 

O 

Q 

t-«)t>.t>.t>.t^tOt^ 

01 

< 

0 

s 

A 

1 

kOiOiO>0>AiCtO>A 

s 

cocococococococo 

S. 

> 

> 

« 

i 

1 

fc 
f 

1i 

CQ3 

'  _;  iH  fH  1-!  ci    1  ci  ci 

e 

—1  (N 

e 

1 

E 

1 

D 

ia 

-►>        _ 

0 

« 

o'*sl3 

^ 1      •      . 

1  t-(  1^ 

«5  OS  «0  O  b-  ■*  T)<  t>. 

% 

1-H  CO 

•^ 

■o 

e 

0 

1 

$  a 

t-OSONOlfl     i«o 

r-l»H(NNMCO        ITJHIO 

■<j(Tj<<3s»ot>.oo>eo 

^^ 

•^ 

s 

0 

w 

c 

S 

s 

•M 

QQ 

x 

■1 

"S    M 

COfOTjtiOCoS      iMOO 

U3  Tjj  to  <N  ■*  t-  Oi  CO 

1 

i 

1    1-1   i-H 

■<JH   Til  TjJ  la  lO   U5  Oi  d 

•0 

J3 

e 
e 

t 

S 

S 

"O 

• 

& 

It 

•*t-cqiCiM«     '^<* 

»ooo^"5"5toeoco 

E 

S§ 

-^'HNC^MM      I'^iO 

rH(NM'<lIlOt>I,-<CO 

^,_i^_i^,-ifOt^ 

e 

> 

< 

+» -< 

t 

CQ 

0 

Z 

fc,-0 

« 
2 

iJ   i 

I'i 

eotO^Ji-iMcc     irHN 

1 

^S 

1, 

^ 

H 

^ 

€0 

a 

J2 

— 

1  OS  OS  OS  OS  OS  O  O)      I 

02 

•^05-*'o5T)<o5Tj<ova>    1 

1  i-i  ea  CO  Ti*  ic  OS  OS     1 

1   1-H    »— 1    t-H    t-(    t— 1    t— (   -^        1 

iiooooqoo 

O  »C  O  ifl  O  iC  o  »o  O      1 

ii-c(NC0'<il<"3«CiOO 

i-<  1-1  <N  im"  M  CO  Tjl  TjJ  lO      1 

lFHi-l>-l.^t-lr-tOIUi 

0. 
o 

« 


32 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 


decreased  slightly  as  the  body  deepened  (Fip:ure  2).  The  mouth  was 
inferior  in  position  until  3.5-3.9  mm  when  it  became  terminal.  The 
larvae  around  5.8  mm  exhibited  asymmetric  growth,  with  the  left  eye 


20-1 


10- 


40- 
30- 
20- 

10- 

0 


^  60H 

Ctl    50H 
40-1 
^30H 
I    20 

i5  10- 

0 
80- 
70- 
60- 
50- 
40- 
30- 
20- 
10- 

0 


,1 


_  ---+-■• 


*      + 


^       -. 


EYE   DIAMETER 


0.1 


FIGURE  3. 


T ' 1 — '    I   '  I  '  r 


—I — 
0.2 


1 — '    I   •  I  •!  I •      I     •    I   '  I  • 


*  4. 


I 


I  f 


f      *+      - 


HEAD  LENGTH 


I     ■    I — '  t '  I ' 


I     '    I  <  I  <  I 


i..-i 


ii 


it.-- 


..  1--  ♦ 


BODY    DEPTH 


I     '    I   '  I  M 1 "— T — "    I   '  I  M  I         ' 1     •    I    '  I  ' 


\        ■ 


H-f- 


+ 1  "^ 


SNOUT  TO  ANUS  LENGTH 


T — '    I    MM 


T ' 1 — '    I    '  I  '! 


0.4   0£  0.8 1.0         2.0         4.0    6.0aOIO 


—I • — I     MM' 

20  40    60  80 


(mm) 


Morphometric   proportions    (in    logorithmic   scale)    of   the    diamond    turbot,   plotted 
OS  percentages  of  standard  length. 


DIAMOND  TURBOT  LARVAE  33 

in  the  midst  of  migration  to  the  right  side.  Eye  diameters  remained 
much  the  same  in  relation  to  body  length  throughout  development 
(Figures). 

The  finfold  began  at  the  forehead  and  extended  posteriorly  around 
the  tail  and  forward  to  the  yolk-sac  or  gut.  It  remained  complete  and 
translucent  throughout  development  until  around  3.8  mm  when  the 
anlagen  of  the  dorsal  and  anal  fins  and  the  caudal  fin  were  seen  form- 
ing. At  hatching  the  pectoral  fin  bud  was  visible  on  the  dorsal  aspects 
of  the  yolk-sac.  By  approximately  2.4  mm,  the  pectoral  fins  appeared 
as  small  lateral  projections. 

The  4.9  mm  larvae  possessed  nearly  developed  dorsal  and  anal  fins 
but  the  fin  ray  counts  were  not  complete.  Likewise,  the  metamorphosing 
larvae  did  not  have  complete  dorsal  and  anal  fin  development,  but  the 
rays  were  more  discernible.  The  caudal  fin  developed  simultaneously 
with  the  dorsal  and  anal  fins.  The  upward  flexion  of  the  caudal  noto- 
chord  occurs  at  about  4.0  mm  s.l.  The  hypural  cartilages  and  the  full 
complement  of  caudal  rays  were  visible  in  the  metamorphic  specimens 
(Figure  2c).  In  these  advanced  larvae,  the  pterygiophore  primordia 
appeared  as  longitudinal  ridges  along  the  bases  of  these  fins.  The 
smallest  juvenile  specimen  (11.5  mm)  did  show  complete  vertical  fin 
ray  development. 

DISCUSSION 

From  occurrences  of  the  larvae,  Hypsopsetta  guttulata  appeared  to 
have  an  extended  spawning  period.  Larvae,  and  what  I  believe  to  be 
the  pelagic  eggs  of  the  diamond  turbot,  were  collected  from  early  June 
through  mid-October. 

These  eggs  averaged  0.80  mm  in  diameter  with  usually  one  large  oil 
globule  (average  0.14  mm  diameter)  and  numerous  other  globules 
scattered  throughout  the  yolk.  They  can  easily  be  distinguished  from 
Pletoronichthys  eggs  by  the  absence  of  the  hexagonal  pattern  on  the 
chorion  and  the  presence  of  oil  globules. 

It  is  very  easy  to  confuse  H.  guttulata  larvae  with  Pleuronichthys 
larvae,  especially  with  the  similarity  in  pigmentation  and  morphology. 
There  are  no  other  known  larvae  in  this  geographical  area  which  have 
such  heavy  pigmentation  and  which  might  be  confused  with  turbot 
larvae.  So  differentiation  needs  to  be  made  between  the  larvae  of  the 
different  turbots  which  might  occur  in  the  San  Francisco  Bay  area. 

In  general,  the  Pleuronichthys  larvae  are  larger  than  Hypsopsetta 
larvae  in  the  early  stages  of  development.  P.  verticalis  is  the  smallest 
at  hatching  being  3.16  mm  (0.12  inch)  long  (Budd  1940).  Even  allow- 
ing for  shrinkage  during  preservation,  Hypsopsetta  larvae  would  not 
exceed  about  2.00  mm  (0.08)  at  hatching.  Yolk-sac  larvae  of  P.  verticalis 
have  a  notable  crest  not  as  pronounced  in  the  diamond  turbot.  Another 
distinguishing  characteristic  for  the  young  is  the  presence  of  oil  globules 
in  the  yolk.  The  finfold  pigment  patches  found  in  both  P.  verticalis 
and  P.  decurrens  are  not  as  developed  or  as  consistently  present  in  the 
diamond  turbot.  Only  the  very  small  Hypsopsetta  larvae  (2.4  mm) 
had  finfold  patches.  The  mottled  turbot,  P.  coenosus,  is  separated  most 
easily  because  it  is  very  large  at  hatching  (5.54  mm)  and  has  heavy 
pigmentation  throughout  its  finfold. 


34  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

It  can  be  seen  that  various  turbot  larvae  are  best  separated  by  pig- 
mentation (especially  in  the  finfold),  and  relative  size  at  which  struc- 
tures develop  in  post  yolk-sac  larvae. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

I  wish  to  acknowledge  the  valuable  advice,  instruction,  and  generous 
time  E.  H.  Ahlstrom  and  H.  G.  Moser  of  the  Southwest  Fisheries 
Oceanography  Center  oiTered  me  during  the  course  of  this  study.  I 
also  would  like  to  thank  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  especially 
Lillian  Dempster,  for  providing  equipment  and  specimens. 

REFERENCES 

Ahlstrom,  E.  H..   and  O.  P.  Ball.     1954.     Description  of  eggs  and  larvae  of  jack 

mackerel    (Trachurus  symmetricus)   and  distribution  and  abundance  of  larvae  in 

1950  and  1951.  U.S.  Fish  Wildl.     Serv.,  Fish.  Bull.  56(97)  :  209-245. 
Baxter,   J.    L.     1960.     Inshore   fishes   of   California.    Calif.    Dep.    Fish    and   Game. 

Sacramento  :  80  p. 
Budd,   P.   L.     1940.     Development   of  the  eggs  and   early  larvae   of  six   California 

fishes.  Calif.  Dep.  Fish  and  Game,  Fish.  Bull.   (56)  :   1-50. 
Jordan,  D.  S.,  and  C.  H.  Gilbert.     1880.     List  of  the  fishes  of  the  Pacific  coast  of 

the  United   States,  with  a   table  showing   the  distribution   of  species.   Proc.   U.S. 

Nat.  Mus.,  3(1880)  :  452-458. 
Lewis,  R.  M.,  W.  F.  Hettler,  Jr.,  E.  P.  H.  Wilkens,  and  G.  N.  Johnson.     1970.     A 

channel  net  for  catching  larval  fishes.  Ches.  Sci.,  11(3)  :  196-197. 
Limbaugh,  C.     1955.     Fish  life  in  the  kelp  beds  and  the  effects  of  kelp  harvesting. 

Univ.  of  Calif.,  Institute  of  Marine  Resources,  Ref.  55-9,   158  p. 
Orton,   G.   L.,   and   C.   Limbaugh.     1953.     Occurrence  of  an   oil  globule  in   eggs  of 

pleuronectid  flatfishes.  Copeia  1953  (2)  :  114-115. 


Calif.  Fish  and  Game  61(1)  :  35-46.     1975. 


THE  FOOD  OF  NEOMYSIS  MERCEDIS  HOLMES  IN 
THE  SACRAMENTO-SAN  JOAQUIN   ESTUARY 

ANGELA  L.  BALDO  KOST  ^  and  ALLEN  W.  KNIGHT 

Deportment  of  Water  Science  and  Engineering 

University  of  California,  Davis 

ABSTRACT 

Gut  contents  were  determined  in  approximately  1500  opossum 
shrimp,  Neomysis  mercedis  Holmes,  from  the  Sacramento-San  Joaquin 
Estuary.  The  shrimp,  obtained  from  12  stations  over  a  13-month  period, 
were  2  to  17  mm  (0.08  to  0.67  inch)  long. 

The  most  abundant  items  in  the  gut  were  detritus  and  diatoms.  The 
percentage  of  detritus  relative  to  diatoms  was  greater  in  winter  than 
in  summer,   and   increased   with   shrimp  size. 

Forty  kinds  of  diatoms  were  found  in  the  gut.  Certain  diatom  genera 
predominated  in  shrimp  from  particular  locations  and  in  shrimp  col- 
lected  during   particular  times  of  the  year. 

Animal  fragments  and  other  items  also  encountered  were  much  less 
abundant  than   detritus   and   diatoms. 

Thus,  the  shrimp  appears  to  eat  a  variety  of  food  items. 

INTRODUCTION 

This  study  was  initiated,  along  with  others  on  the  opossum  shrimp, 
Neomysis  mercedis  Holmes,  to  improve  understanding  of  environmental 
relationships  in  the  Sacramento-San  Joaquin  Estuary  which  might  be 
affected  by  water  development  projects.  The  present  study  is  an  im- 
portant component  of  an  extensive  investigation  into  many  aspects  of 
the  biology  and  ecology  of  N.  mercedis  and  the  striped  bass,  Morone 
saxatilis. 

N.  mercedis  is  an  important  component  of  the  trophic  structure  of 
the  Sacramento-San  Joaquin  Estuary.  This  shrimp  is  the  major  food 
item  in  the  diet  of  young  striped  bass  in  all  seasons  of  the  year  (Stevens 
1966).  This  study  involved  the  gut  contents  of  approximately  1500 
opossum  shrimp  collected  from  Suisun  Bay  and  the  Delta  from  March 
1970  through  March  1971.  Very  little  previous  information  was  avail- 
able on  the  feeding  habits  of  this  shrimp. 

MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 
Sampling  Stations 

The  opossum  shrimp  were  collected  by  the  California  Department  of 


Fish  and  Game,  Bay-Delta  Fishery  Project,  from  12  stations  extendin^ 
from  Suisun  Bay  up  the  Sacramento  River  to  Rio  Vista,  and  up  the 
San  Joaquin  River  almost  to  Stockton  (Figure  1).  The  station  numbers 
used  in  this  study  are  those  of  the  California  Department  of  Fish  and 
Game. 

1  Present  address:  9321  Discovery  Way,  Apt.  H,  La  Jolla,  California  92037.  Accepted 
August  1974. 

(  35  ) 


36 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 


Sampling  Procedure 

Each  month  from  March  1970  to  March  1971  a  sample  was  obtained 
from  each  of  the  12  stations,  for  a  total  of  156  samples.  Monthly- 
sampling  was  conducted  during  three  consecutive  days  between  one- 
half  hour  before  and  one  hour  after  high  neap  tide. 

Samples  were  taken  with  a  cone-shaped  plankton  net  of  silk  bolting 
cloth  with  23  meshes  per  inch.  The  net  opening  was  0.1  m-  (1.07  ft^). 
A  diagonal  tow  was  made  from  the  bottom  to  the  surface,  and  each 
tow  took  approximately  10  minutes. 

Each  sample  was  preserved  with  5-10%  formalin,  along  with  enough 
Rose  Bengal  dye  to  stain  the  shrimp. 

Five  pair  of  shrimp  were  selected  from  each  sample.  The  shrimp 
were  selected  to  obtain  a  wide  range  of  sizes  (2-17  mm  from  the  anterior 


STOCKTON 


SACRAMENTO -SAN  JOAQUIN 
BAY    DELTA 

NEOMYSIS    SAMPLING   STATIONS 


FIGURE   1.     Sacramento-San  Joaquin  Bay-Delta  Estuary  System,  Neomysis  sampling  stations. 


NEOMYSIS    MERCEDIS    FOOD 


37 


end  of  the  eyestalk  to  the  base  of  the  telson).  The  sex  was  determined 
for  each  organism  7  mm  and  longer.  Shrimp  shorter  than  7  mm  could 
not  be  sexed  and  were  considered  as  juveniles.  Shrimp  of  the  same 
size  and  sex  were  chosen  for  each  pair,  and  their  gut  contents  were 
pooled. 

Shrimp  Dissection  and  Slide  Preparation 

The  stomach  and  intestine  were  removed  from  each  shrimp  with  two 
fine  needles  under  a  dissecting  microscope.  The  full  gut  was  located 
readily  since  it  did  not  take  up  the  stain.  The  thin  exoskeleton  was 
teased  apart  along  the  dorsal  surface  of  the  organism  from  the  head  to 
the  base  of  the  telson,  and  the  gut  was  then  carefully  lifted  out. 

Each  pair  of  pooled  guts  was  placed  on  a  glass  microscope  slide  in  a 
drop  of  water.  The  stomach  and  intestine  were  gently  broken  open 
with  the  needles,  and  the  contents  were  dispersed  and  stirred  in  the 
water. 

The  slide  was  then  air-dried,  a  drop  of  Permount  mounting  medium 
was  applied,  and  a  1  cm^  glass  coverslip  was  placed  on  the  slide.  The 
preparation  was  dried  overnight. 

Enumeration  of  Gut  Contents 

Items  present  in  the  mounted  gut  contents  were  counted  and  iden- 
tified with  a  compound  microscope  at  400  X-  Every  item  was  enumerated 
except  when  more  than  1000  algal  cells  were  present  on  a  slide.  In  such 
cases  (about  half  of  the  total),  enumeration  was  terminated  at  1000 
cells.  According  to  Javornicky  (1958)  counting  1000  cells  limits  the 
expected  error  to  ±6.3%   (with  a  probability  of  0.95). 


TABLE  1. — Diatoms  Encountered  in  Neomysis  Gut  Contents 

Diatom 

Total 
number 
counted 

Diatom 

Total 
number 
counted 

Coscinodiscus  sp. - _- 

196,633 

166.380 

57.206 

16,893 

11,882 

7,173 

6,450 

4.661 

4,412 

3,547 

2,002 

1.808 

1,182 

446 

414 

288 

285 

250 

223 

174 

Rhopalodia  sp. 

159 

Melosira  sp.     _- 

Gomphonema  sp.  No.  1 

Surirella  sp.  No.  2 

143 

Cvclotella  ST>.              _ 

96 

Nitzschia  paradoxa 

Nitzschia  sp.  No.  4 

88 

Tabellaria  sp. 

Pinnularia  sp. 

85 

Diatoma  sp.                .   _ 

Stauroneis  sp 

45 

Fragilaria  sp.  No.  1 

Eunotia  sp.     .     _.       .- 

32 

Stephanodiscus  sp. 

Fragilaria  sp.  No.  2 

22 

Synedra  sp.      ..--.     .--. 

Actinoptychus  sp 

18 

Asterionella  sp. 

Pleurosigma  sp.          

15 

Epithemia  sp. . 

Meridian  sp. 

13 

Naviciila  sp.. . 

Acnanthes  sp -- 

9 

Triceratium  sp.  _    

Gyrosigma  sp. 

6 

Cocconeis  sp. 

Amphora  sp.       _   . 

5 

Cymbella  sp. .   .   .. 

Fragilaria  arcus 

5 

Nitzschia  sp.  No.  2 . 

Skeletonema  sp..       

4 

Surirella  sp.  No.  1 . 

Lepidodiscus  sp. 

3 

Rhoicosphenia  sp .. 

Frust  ula  sp 

1 

Nitzschia  sp.  No.  3 _.   __ 

Gomphonema  sp.  No.  2 

Nedium  9p. 

1 

Diploneis  sp. 

1 

38 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 


Algae  were  identified  to  the  generic  level,  but  many  animal  fragments 
could  not  be  identified  and  were  included  in  the  general  category 
"animal  fragments". 

Detritus  was  enumerated  by  using  a  microscope  ocular  attachment 
which  divided  the  field  into  100  squares,  0.0258  mm  on  a  side,  at  400 X- 
The  quantity  of  detritus  was  approximated  by  counting  the  number  of 
squares  filled  in  each  field  examined.  The  portion  of  the  field  occupied 
by  diatoms  was  also  estimated,  according  to  the  detailed  procedure 
described  elsewhere  (Baldo,  1972). 

RESULTS 

The  most  abundant  of  the  materials  found  in  the  gut  were  detritus 
and  diatoms.  Each  varied  in  importance  with  station,  time  of  year, 
and  size  of  shrimp.  Of  the  identifiable  material,  a  total  of  40  diatoms 
were  encountered  (Table  1).  In  addition  there  were  2  genera  of  green 
algae,  one  dinoflagellate,  rotifer  loricas,  tintinid  loricas,  crustacean 
fragments,  sponge  spicules,  pollen  grains,  and  (apparently)  fragments 
of  higher  plants  (Table  2). 


TABLE  2. — Additionol  Items  Encountered  in  Neomysis  Gut  Contents 


Item 


Total  number 
counted 


Green  algae 

Scenedesmus 

Pediastrum 

Dinoflagellate 

Ceralium 

Rotifer  loricas 

Tintined  lociras 

Crustacean  fragments. . 

Sponge  spicules 

Pollen  grains 

Higher-plant  fragments 


38 
20 


252 
129 
739 
129 
252 
10 


Detritus 

The  majority  of  the  guts  examined  contained  a  significant  amount  of 
unidentifiable  material.  This  unidentifiable  material  was  classified  as 
detritus.  It  was  usually  a  gold-brown  color.  Some  of  this  material  ap- 
peared to  be  homogeneous,  but  it  was  generally  mixed  with  particles  or 
objects  of  different  sizes  and  shapes  of  unknown  origin.  This  material 
was  probably  either  organic  debris  (e.g.,  peat  or  plant  material)  that 
the  shrimp  had  ingested,  or  partially  digested  algal  material.  Its  actual 
origin  was  not  determined. 

Comparison  of  the  relative  amounts  of  detritus  and  diatoms  in  the 
guts  showed  that  detritus  was  more  important  during  the  winter  (De- 
cember to  March),  while  diatoms  were  more  important  during  the  sum- 
mer and  early  fall  (Figure  2). 


NEOMYSIS    MERCEDIS   FOOD 


39 


DETRITUS 


DIATOMS 


8       9       1.0 
MONTHS 


11      12 


FIGURE  2.  The  percentage  of  total  diatoms  and  detritus  relative  to  each  other.  Gut  contents 
from  all  12  stations  combined  for  each  month  from  March  1970  through  March 
1971. 


Over  the  shrimp  size  range  evaluated,  the  relative  amounts  of  detritus 
and  diatoms  differed  markedly.  Diatoms  were  more  plentiful  in  small 
shrimp  than  in  large  ones.  On  the  other  hand,  detritus  was  more 
abundant  in  the  larger  shrimp  (Figure  3).  Shrimp  16  to  17  mm  long 
were  excluded  because  only  one  of  each  was  examined.  Calculations  for 
most  of  the  other  sizes  were  based  on  more  than  80  individuals.  The 
increase  in  percentage  of  detritus  with  size  was  rather  uniform  except 
for  2  mm  shrimp  (which  included  only  9  individuals). 


% 

lOOn 
SO- 
SO- 
70 
60 
50- 
40- 
iO\ 
20 
lOJ 


0 


lllllllllll  DIATOMS 
■1^  DETRITUS 


5         6         7         8         9 
SHRIMP  SIZE    IN  MM 


10 


12 


15 


FIGURE  3.     The   percentage  of  total   diatoms   and   detritus   relative  to  each   other   in   the  gut 
of  shrimp  of  different  sizes  (2   to  15  mm),  all  stations  and  months  combined. 


40 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 


Diatoms 

Of  the  40  kinds  of  diatoms  t'lieountorod  in  tho  guts  of  N.  mercedis, 
certain  genera  predominated  (Table  1).  Two  diatoms,  Coscinodiscus 
and  Melosira,  were  far  more  abundant  than  the  rest.  Coscinodiscus  was 


MEL05IRA 


CYCLOTELLA 


TABELLARIA 


NITZSCHIA 

PARADOXA 


DIATOMA 


FRAGILARIA 


STEPHANOOISCUS 


SYNEORA 


ASTEHIONELLA 


EPITHEMIA 


NAVICULA 


THICERATIUM 


24      44     34     52 


58     62     68 

STATIONS 


74      80    88     92     102 


FIGURE  4. 


Variation  in  the  13  most  common  diatom  genera  encountered  in  the  gut  of 
shrimp  from  each  of  the  12  Bay-Delta  stations,  oil  months  combined.  Each 
genus  is  represented  as  its  percent  of  total  diatoms.  Diatoms  not  included  con- 
stituted   less  than    1%   of  the  total. 


NEOMYSIS    MERCEDIS   FOOD 


41 


CYCLOTELLA 


TABELLARIA 


NITZSCHIA 

PARADOXA 


DIATOMA 


FRAGILARIA 


STEPHANODISCUS 


SYNEDRA 


ASTERIONELLA 


TRICERATIUM 


3456789       10     11       12       1        23 

MONTHS 


FIGURE  5.  Variation  in  the  13  most  common  diatom  genera  encountered  in  the  gut  of 
shrimp  from  March  1970  through  March  T977,  all  stations  combined.  Each  genus 
is  represented   as   its  percent  of  the  total   diatoms. 


the  most  important  diatom  in  guts  of  shrimp  from  the  lower  Delta 
and  Suisun  Bay  stations  (Figure  4).  At  these  downstream  stations  it 
often  constituted  90  to  99%  of  the  total  diatoms.  The  diatom  Melosira 
replaced  Coscinodiscns  as  the  most  abundant  diatom  in  shrimp  from 
upper  Delta  stations  during  most  of  the  year.  Cyclotella  was  also  im- 


42 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 


portant  at  eastern  stations,  especially  at  station  92,  near  Stockton. 
These  geographical  variations  in  the  relative  abundance  of  the  various 
diatoms  were  greater  than  seasonal  variations  in  relative  abundance 
(Figures). 


Coscincxiiscus 


7       8       9 
MONTHS 

FIGURE  6.  Variation  in  the  diatom  Coscinodiscus  sp.,  represented  as  its  percent  of  the  total 
diatoms  in  the  gut  for  each  month  from  March  1970  through  March  1971  at  12 
Bay-Delta  stations. 

Figures  6,  7,  and  8  are  three-dimensional  graphs  showing  the  spatial 
and  temporal  distribution  of  the  3  most  common  diatoms.  Each  diatom 
is  represented  as  its  percent  of  the  total  diatoms  in  all  the  guts  ex- 
amined from  each  station  and  each  month.  It  is  again  evident  that 
Coscinodiscus  was  the  most  abundant  diatom  in  the  gut  from  the  lower 
Delta.  It  was  replaced  by  Melosira  as  the  most  common  diatom  in  the 
upper  Delta.  The  percentage  of  Coscinodiscus  in  shrimp  from  stations 
in  the  upper  Delta  is  greater  from  June  to  August  than  during  the 


Melosira 


3       4        5        6      7      8       9        10      11     12       1        2       ._ 
MONTHS 

FIGURE  7.  Variation  in  the  diatom  Melosira  sp.,  represented  as  its  percent  of  the  total 
diatoms  in  the  gut  for  each  month  from  March  1970  through  March  1971  at  12 
Boy-Delta  stations. 


NEOMYSIS    MERCEDIS   FOOD 


43 


rest  of  the  year  (Figure  6).  This  increase  appears  to  be  related  to  the 
salinity,  which  increases  upstream  during  the  summer  when  the  flow 
in  the  rivers  is  decreased  (Figure  9). 

Distribution  of  the  remaining  diatoms  in  the  guts  also  varied  geo- 
graphically and  seasonally.  For  example,  Triceratium  appeared  pre- 
dominantly at  station  102  during  most  of  the  year  whereas  Tdbellaria 
appeared  at  station  68  during  the  late  spring  and  early  summer.  For 
a  more  complete  description  of  the  distribution  of  the  less  common  dia- 
toms, seeBaldo  (1972). 

Animal  Fragments  and  Other  Gut  Contents 

Many  guts  contained  fragments  (mostly  appendages)  of  unidentified 
crustaceans.  A  copepod  was  encountered  which  was  nearly  intact.  The 


Cyclotella 


MONTHS 

FIGURE  8.  Variation  in  the  diatom  Cyclofella  sp.,  represented  as  its  percent  of  the  total 
diatoms  in  the  gut  for  each  month  from  March  1970  through  March  1971  at 
12  Bay-Delta  stations. 


1(^000 


ELECTRICAL 

CONDUCTIVITY 


MONTHS 

FIGURE  9.  Variation  in  electrical  conductivity  in  umhos  of  water  at  12  Bay-Delta  stations 
for  each  month  from  May  1970  through  March  1971.  Data  are  from  Knight, 
Biggar,  and  Tanji,  1972. 


44  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

crustacean  fragments  found  increased  in  number  with  shrimp  size,  but 
so  few  crustaceans  were  found  that  the  validity  of  this  observation  is 
questionable. 

Rotifer  loricas  which  appeared  to  be  of  the  genus  Kcratella  were 
found  in  a  number  of  shrimp.  Tintinid  loricas  were  less  common.  The 
number  of  rotifers  or  tintinids  present  was  not  correlated  with  shrimp 
size. 

At  least  two  varieties  of  sponge  spicules  were  present  in  the  gut  of 
a  number  of  shrimp. 

Two  genera  of  green  algae,  Scenedesmus  and  Pcdiastrum,  were  en- 
countered in  very  small  numbers.  A  single  dinoflagellate,  Ceratiiim, 
was  found  in  a  shrimp  from  Suisun  Bay. 

Pollen  grains  were  present  in  very  small  numbers  at  every  station. 

Fragments  of  higher  plants  were  only  minor  contributions. 

For  more  information  on  the  spatial  and  temporal  distribution  of 
these  items,  see  Baldo  (1972). 

DISCUSSION 

Many  investigators  (e.g.,  Esterly  1916,  Wilson  1951,  Mecom  and 
Cummins  1964,  Hart  1934)  have  noted  that  recognizable  items  in  the 
gut  may  not  be  the  sole  source  of  nutrition.  In  some  cases  the  items 
may  not  even  be  a  source  of  nutrition.  The  hard  skeletons  of  items 
such  as  diatoms  and  crustaceans  may  be  the  main  reason  for  their 
retention  and  recognition  in  the  gut.  Many  kinds  of  algae  such  as 
greens  and  blue-greens  would  be  less  likely  to  retain  their  original 
structure  after  being  eaten  and  partially  or  totally  digested.  Items  such 
as  bacteria,  either  free  in  the  water  or  surrounding  detritus  particles, 
and  other  nanoplankters  which  would  be  difficult  to  identify  in  the 
guts,  may  or  may  not  play  a  significant  role  in  the  nutrition  of  these 
shrimp. 

Data  were  obtained  from  the  Federal  Bureau  of  Reclamation  in 
Sacramento  on  the  phytoplankton  present  at  Delta  stations  during  the 
same  period.  Many  of  the  diatoms  found  in  the  shrimp  guts  were 
similar  to  those  in  the  phytoplankton  samples.  A  number  of  Chloro- 
phyta,  Cyanophyta,  and  Crytophyta.  however,  which  were  present  in 
the  phytoplankton  samples  were  not  in  the  shrimp  guts.  It  was  not 
possible  to  determine  from  the  gut  contents  examined  whether  the 
shrimp  ingested  these  green  algae  and  other  forms  and  digested  them 
beyond  identification,  or  whether  they  selected  against  these  forms. 

The  seasonal  changes  in  the  relative  occurrence  of  detritus  and  dia- 
toms in  the  guts  noted  in  this  study  presumably  reflect  changes  in  their 
relative  availability.  Diatoms  are  several  times  more  abundant  in  the 
environment  during  the  summer  than  in  the  winter  (Delta  Fish  and 
Wildlife  Protection  Study,  1972).  Conversely,  detritus  may  be  more 
abundant  during  the  winter,  when  increased  runoff  likely  carries  greater 
amounts  of  organic  debris  into  the  Estuary.  Both  of  these  probable 
changes  parallel  the  changes  in  relative  abundance  observed  in  the 
shrimp  guts. 

This  study  does  indicate  that  N.  mercedis  is  able  to  ingest  a  wide 
variety  of  foods.  It  is  reasonable  to  assume  that  it  utilizes  whatever 
food  is  available  at  any  particular  place  or  time,  whether  it  be  detritus 
or  one  kind  of  diatom  or  another. 


NEOMYSIS    MERCEDIS   FOOD  45 

Mauchline  (1967)  indicated  similar  results  for  the  mysid  Schistomysis 
spiritis.  That  shrimp  extracts  suspended  matter  indiscriminately  from 
the  water  and  must  therefore  use  a  large  variety  of  foods.  In  guts  of 
S.  spiritis  he  found  fine  particulate  matter  mixed  with  sand  grains, 
various  diatoms,  dinoflagellates,  filamentous  algae,  some  leaf  fragments, 
spores,  and  seeds  of  terrestrial  origin.  In  addition,  Mauchline 
(1971a,  b)  found  that  the  mysid,  Paramysis  arenosa  and  Neomysis  inte- 
ger could  utilize  many  food  types  when  available,  including  plant  and 
animal  matter,  detritus,  and  inorganic  particles.  I?aymont  et  al  (1964) 
stated  that  mysids  take  whatever  food  is  more  or  less  immediately 
available.  They  indicated  that  detritus  is  important  in  the  nutrition  of 
N.  integer,  especially  in  estuarine  conditions  where  there  is  normally  a 
constant  supply  of  organic  matter.  They  observed  Neomysis  stirring  up 
detritus  on  the  bottom  with  its  appendages  and  ingesting  it.  Lasenby 
and  Langford  (1973)  found  that  My  sis  relicta  in  two  Canadian  lakes 
is  potentially  omnivorous. 

Wilson  (1951)  examined  the  stomach  contents  of  Neomysis  mercedis 
Holmes  in  British  Columbia,  and  found  diatoms,  dinoflagellates,  blue- 
green  algae,  vascular  plant  material,  and  animal  material  consisting  of 
mainly  copepod  and  mysidacean  remains. 

Tattersall  (1951)  indicates  that  most  mysidacea,  including  N.  integer, 
filter-feed  microscopic  plants  and  animals  and  detritus.  They  are  able 
to  pounce  on  living  copepods  and  ingest  them  and  have  been  seen  carry- 
ing around  dead  mysids  and  amphipods  of  their  own  size  while  eating 
them.  Acanthomysis  scidpta  will  readily  eat  injured  or  freshly  killed 
members  of  its  own  species  and  anything  else  it  can  capture  (Green 
1970).  N.  mercedis  has  been  seen  in  the  lab  eating  dead  or  weak  mem- 
bers of  its  own  species. 

It  is  probable  that  shifts  in  environmental  quality  would  alter  the 
food  supply  available  to  A'^.  mercedis.  Changes  in  water  chemistry 
(salinity,  pollutants,  etc.)  would  favor  certain  forms  of  algae  rather 
than  others.  Increased  turbidity  could  inhibit  algal  growth.  However, 
since  N.  mercedis  appears  to  utilize  a  diversity  of  items,  food  will 
probably  not  be  limiting  to  the  shrimp  as  long  as  either  detritus  or 
some  form  of  algae  is  present  in  sufficient  quantity. 

SUMAAARY 

1.  Detritus  and  diatoms  were  the  major  food  items  found  in  the  gut 
of  N.  mercedis  from  the  Sacramento-San  Joaquin  Delta.  Animal  frag- 
ments and  other  items  were  less  abundant. 

2.  The  relative  abundance  of  detritus  and  diatoms  in  the  gut  varied 
during  the  year.  Diatoms  increased  in  relative  amounts  in  summer,  and 
detritus  increased  in  the  winter  months. 

3.  The  relative  importance  of  detritus  increased  in  the  gut  of  larger 
shrimp,  and,  conversely  the  relative  importance  of  diatoms  increased 
in  the  gut  of  smaller  shrimp. 

4.  Previous  reports  indicate  that  mysid  shrimp  are  capable  of  utiliz- 
ing a  wide  variety  of  foods.  The  results  of  this  study  are  consistent  with 
those  reports.  The  shrimp  N.  mercedis  appears  to  be  omnivorous. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

This  research  was  supported  in  part  by  a  grant  from  the  Water 
Resources  Center,  project  number  W243.  We  thank  Harold  Chadwick 


46  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

and  staff  of  the  California  Fish  and  Game  Department-Delta  Study 
group  for  providing  the  opossum  shrimp  and  extending  many  courtesies 
and  conveniences.  Gerald  J.  Kost  was  of  considerable  assistance  in 
computer  analysis  of  these  data.  The  authors  are  grateful  to  Mary  Ann 
Simmons  for  her  assistance  in  preparation  of  this  manuscript. 

REFERENCES 

Baldo,   A.   L.     1972.     The  food   of  Neotnysis   aicatschensis    in   the   Sacramento-San 

Joaquin  Delta.     Masters  Thesis,  University  of  California  at  Davis.  Davis,  Cali- 
fornia. 
Delta    Fish    and    Wildlife    Protection    Study.     1972.     Dissolved    Oxygen    Dynamics 

Sacramento-San    Joaquin    Delta    and    Suisun    Bay.     California    Departments    of 

Water  Resources  and  Fish  and  Game.  129  pp. 
Esterly,  J.  L.     1916.     Feeding  habits  and  food  of  pelagic  copepods  and  the  question 

of  nutrition  by  organic  substances  in  solution  in  water.     Universitv  of  California 

Publ.  Zool.  16 :  171-184. 
Green,    J.    W.     1970.     Observations    on    the    behavior    and    larval    development    of 

Acanthomysis  sculpta   (Tattersall)    (Mysidacea).  Canadian  J.  Zool.  48:289-292. 
Hart,  T.  J.     1934.     On  the  phytoplankton  of  the  south  west  Atlantic  and  Belling- 

shaussen  Sea  1929-1931.     Discovery  Rep.  8 :  1-268. 
Javornicky,   Pavel.     1958.     Revision   of  some  methods  of  quantative  estimation   of 

phvtoplankton.  Scientific  papers  of  the  Chemical  Engineering  School.     1958.     Fac. 

Technol.  Fuels  and  Water  2  :  283-367. 
Knight,  A.  W.,  J.  W.  Biggar  and  K.  K.  Tanji.     1972.     Bay  Delta  Water  Chemistry 

Study,  unpublished  data.     Dept.  of  Water  Science  and  Engineering,  U.  C.  Davis, 

Davis,  California. 
Lasenby,  D.  C,  and  R.  R.  Langford.     1973.     Feeding  and  assimilation   of  Mysis 

relicta.     Limnol.  Oceanogr.  18  :  280-285. 
Mauchline,  J.     1967.     The  biology  of  Schistomysis  spiritus  (Crustacea,  Mysidacea). 

J.  Mar.  Biol.  Assoc.  U.  K.  47 :  383-396. 
Mauchline,  J.     1971a.     The  biology  of  Paramysis  arenosa  (Crustacea,  Mysidacea). 

J.  Mar.  Biol.  Assoc.  U.  K.  51 :  339-346. 
Mauchline,  J.     1971b.     The   biology  of  Neomysis   integer    (Crustacea.   Mysidacea). 

J.  Mar.  Biol.  Assoc.  U.  K.  51 :  347-354. 
Mecom,  J.   O.,   and  K.   W.   Cummins.     19(>4.     A  preliminary   study   of   the   trophic 

relationships  of  the  larvae  of  Brachycentrus  americanus  (Banks).     Trans.  Amer. 

Microscop.  Soc.  83  :  239-250. 
Raymont,  J.  E.  C,  J.  Austin  and  E.  Linford.     1964.     Biochemical  studies  on  marine 

zooplankton.     I.     The   biochemical  composition   of  Neomysis   integer.     J.   Conseil 

Perm.  Intern.  Exploration  Mer.  28 :  354-363. 
Stevens,  Donald  E.     1966.     Food  habits  of  striped   bass,   Roccus   saxatilis,   in   the 

Sacramento-San  Joaquin  Delta.     Calif.   Dept.   Fish   and   Game,   Fish   Bull.   136 : 

68-96. 
Tattersall,  W.  M.,  and  O.   S.   Tattersall.     1951.     The   British   Mysidacea.       Lond. 

Ray  Society.  460  p. 
Wilson,    R.    R.     1951.     Distribution,    growth,    feeding    habits,    abundance,    thermal 

and    salinitj'    relations    of    Neomysis    mercedes    (Holmes)     from    Xicomekl    and 

Serpentine   Rivers,    British    Columbia.     M.    A.   Thesis,    U.    of   British    Columbia, 

Vancouver, 


Calif.  Fish  and  Game  61(1)  :  47-53.     1975. 


NOTE  ON  THE  ECOLOGY  OF  THE  RATFISH, 
HYDROLAGUS  COLLEI,  IN  THE  GULF  OF  CALIFORNIA^ 

C.  p.  MATHEWS 

FAO/INP 

AP  M-10,  778 

Mexico  (1)  D.F.  Mexico^ 

Hydrolagus  collei,  the  ratflsh,  has  been  taken  frequently  in  the  north- 
ern Gulf  of  California.  This  species  shows  a  marked  migratory  pattern 
being  relatively  abundant  and  widely  distributed  in  this  area  in  Febru- 
ary-March, and  found  at  few  stations  and  in  low  numbers  in  June 
and  August.  Males  appear  to  grow  more  slowly  than  females  and  are 
less  frequent  in  the  catches.  The  breeding  season  must  be  several 
months  before  or  after  the  period  of  spring  abundance  in  the  northern 
Gulf. 

Hydrolagus  coffei,  el  pez  llamado  pez  rata  de  California,  ha  side 
capturado  frecuentemente  en  el  norte  del  Golfo  de  California.  Esta 
especie  demuestra  un  patr6n  migratorio;  es  relativamente  abundante 
en  esta  zona  en  febrero  y  marzo  y  muy  restringido  en  su  distribuci6n 
y  en  abundancias  muy  bajas  en  junio  y  en  agosto.  La  estaci6n  de  repro- 
duccion  debe  de  estar  varies  meses  antes  a  despuis  del  periodo  de 
abundancias  altas  en  el  norte  del  Golfo  de  California. 

INTRODUCTION 

Hydrolagus  collei  has  been  known  to  occur  in  eastern  Pacific  tropical 
waters  from  western  Alaska  to  northern  Baja  California ;  Johnson  and 
Horton  (1972)  have  described  some  aspects  of  the  ecology  of  this 
species.  It  is  the  object  of  this  paper  to  present  some  of  the  results  of 
the  exploratory  and  prospective  fishing  cruises  of  the  Alejandro  de 
Humboldt,  during  which  Hydrolagus  collei  was  found  to  be  fairly 
widespread  although  usually  in  low  abundances,  at  certain  times  of  the 
year  in  the  northern  Gulf  of  California.  During  a  series  of  cruises  con- 
ducted by  the  K/V  Alejandro  de  Humboldt  of  the  Instituto  Nacional 
de  Pesca  of  Mexico,  between  June,  1971  and  March,  1972,  suflScient  data 
were  gathered  for  the  bathymetric  and  geographic  distributions  of  this 
species  to  be  known  in  the  area  from  Guaymas  to  Isla  Tiburon  and  in 
the  zone  north  of  Isla  Tiburon  and  Isla  Angel  de  la  Guarda.  During 
cruises  conducted  from  April  1971  to  December  1971,  in  other  parts  of 
the  Gulf  of  California  no  ratfish  were  taken  although  on  all  cruises  the 
same  depths  (100-600  m)   (328-1,968  ft)  were  sampled. 

METHODS 

The  Alejandro  de  Humboldt  is  a  42  m  (138  foot),  450  gross  ton  stern 
trawler  equipped  as  a  research  vessel.  The  usual  sampling  tool  was  an 
otter-trawl  net,  with  a  41  m  (136  feet)  headline,  and  cod-ends  with 
mesh  sizes  of  4.5  cm  (1.8  inches)  and  5.5  cm  (2.2  inches).  The  smaller 

1  These  views  do  not  necessarily  reflect  those  of  FAO.  Accepted  for  publication  June 

1974. 
*  Present    address :    Department    of    Fisheries    Oceanography,    Escuela    Superior    de 

Ciencias  Marinas,  Ensenada,  B.C.,  Mexico. 

(47) 


48 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 


mesh  cod-end  was  employed  only  from  July  1971  onwards,  but  is  not 
thought  to  have  increased  the  vulnerability  of  ratfish  to  the  net  during 
this  period. 

Specimens  of  ratfish  were  separated  from  the  catch,  and  were  usually 
measured  (total  body  length  in  cm)  and  sexed. 

RESULTS 

Ratfish  were  taken  from  the  mid-Gulf  northward,  but  the  area  of 
greatest  concentration  was  to  the  north  of  Isla  Angel  de  la  Guarda. 


rJune    1S71 
August    19  71 


a         February-March    19  72 


30°      Lot  N 


100    fathom   Isobath    (183  m) 

200   fathom  isobath    (366  m) 

—  .    -  •      400    fathom  Isobath    (732   m) 


SCALC     in     nautical    MItC  S  . 


FIGURE   1.     Distribution  of  Hydrolagus  colUi  in  the  Northern  Gulf  of  California. 


GULF  OF  CALIFORNIA  RATFISH 


49 


TABLE  1 . — Stations  at  Which  Hydrolagus  eollei  was  Captured 
by  the  "Alejandro  de  Humboldt" 


Number  of 
specimens 


Total  length 
in  cms. 


Depth  (m) 


Date  1971 

19  June 

20  June 

21  June 

23  August... 
1  September 

Date  1972 

23  February. 
23  February. 
23  February. 

23  February. 

24  February. 

25  February. 
28  February. 
28  February. 
28  February. 

28  February. 

29  February, 
29  February. 
29  February. 
29  February. 
29  February. 

1  March 

2  March 

3  March 

10  March... 
10  March 


6 
1 
4 
1 
1 


4 

3 

23 

33 

3 

11 

112 

76 

17 

4 

4 

4 

15 

75 

40-50 

7 

17 

2 

6 

58 


40 
51 


42-49 
38-55 
33-50 
40-42 
25-51 
2&-49 
36-45 
38-50 
39-51 

46-48 
39-49 
30-50 

38-51 
43-55 
50-51 
36-44 
36-44 


412-446 
502-506 
290-310 
540-560 
294-296 


196 
304-307 
390-394 
309-312 
192-220 
366-415 
288-292 
304-332 
250-298 
201-226 

300m 
330 
290 

292-296 
282-360 
268-274 
264-321 
398-400 
420-434 
341-348 


Barely  some  specimens  were  found  between  Guaymas  and  Isla  Tiburon. 

Ratfish  were  far  more  abundant  in  February-March  1972  than  in 
June  or  August  1971   (Figure   1,  Table  1). 

In  interpreting  these  data,  it  is  important  to  remember  that  in  June 
and  August-September  1971,  approximately  50  hours  of  fishing  were 
spent  in  the  area  in  which  ratfish  were  subsequently  found  in  February- 
March  1972,  when  about  60  hours  were  fished.  Therefore,  the  amount 
of  fishing  effort  expended  in  the  summer  of  1971  and  early  spring, 
1972  was  approximately  equal  and  the  marked  differences  in  abundance 
and  distribution  are  not  caused  by  differences  in  fishing  effort  expended. 
They  are  probably  due  to  migratory  movements  of  the  fish  themselves, 
either  towards  depths  the  Alexandre  de  Humboldt  could  not  sample,  or 
out  of  the  Gulf  of  California. 

Most  stations  (16  out  of  19)  at  which  ratfish  were  found  were  situated 
from  270-430  m  deep. 

Abundances,  expressed  in  numbers  of  fish  per  hectare,  varied  from 
0.1  fish/ha  to  2.9  fish/ha  (Figure  2). 

These  depths  also  contain  all  stations  at  which  abundances  exceeded 
two  individuals  per  hectare.  However,  ratfish  were  found  up  to  196  m 
deep  in  low  abundances  (0.2  or  less/ha). 

The  envelope  curve  for  the  stations  at  which  ratfish  were  found  in 
summer  1971,  is  based  on  only  five  occurrences,  but  three  of  these  were 


50 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 


ABUNDANCE.      NUMBERS  /ha. 


100- 


200- 


E 


Ql 

Q 


3  00- 


3 

_i 


500- 


FIGURE  2.     Bathymetric  distribution  and  abundance  of  Hydrolagus  collei. 


GULF  OP  CALIFORNIA  RATFISH 


51 


in  deeper  waters  than  any  of  the  spring  1972  occurrences  (Table  1), 
and  all  five  occurrences  were  in  low  abundances  (0.1-0.4  fish/ha).  This 
suggests  that  in  summer  (June-September)  ratfish  move  out  of  the 
northern  Gulf  of  California  into  deeper  waters  and  return  at  the  latest 
by  the  end  of  winter  (February),  probably  earlier. 

A  total  of  448  ratfish  was  measured  and  sexed  on  the  Alexandre  de 
Humboldt  in  February  and  March  1972  (Figure  3).  Two  modes  are 
present,  at  38-39  cm  and  at  47  cm,  corresponding  to  the  maximum 
occurrence  of  male  and  female  fish.  It  is  unlikely  that  there  is  any  ques- 
tion of  sex  reversal  in  this  species,  so  it  may  be  concluded  that  females 
grow  to  a  larger  size  than  males.  From  45-55  cm  10  fish  were  males  and 
168  females,  giving  a  sex  ratio  of  94.4%  females,  with  no  males  from 
52-55  cm.  On  the  other  hand,  from  35-44  cm,  131  males  and  104 
females  were  found,  giving  a  sex  ratio  of  44.3%  females.  Females  pre- 
dominate in  the  catch,  of  which  67.2%  were  females  and  42.8%  males. 

Twenty-seven  females,  all  taken  in  spring  1971,  from  36-55  cm  in 
length,  were  opened  and  their  gonads  were  examined.  Two  stages  were 
recognized : 

i)  Ovaries  moderately  developed,  include  at  least  one  clear  yellow, 
yolky  egg  2.0-2.5  cm  in  diameter;  frequently  other,  smaller  and 
similar  bodies  were  present. 

ii)   Immature,  when  the  ovaries  are  small  and  undeveloped  (Table  2). 

TABLE  2.— Maturity  in  Female  Ratfish 


Total  body  length 
(cm) 

State  of  ovaries 

Immature 

With  eggs 

36-40 

Three  immature  fish 

3 

1 
6 
0 

0 

41-45 

46-50* 

51-55 

One  fish  with  eggs,  one  fish  immature 

Five  fish  with  eggs,  six  fish  immature 

Eleven  fish  with  eggs 

1 

5 

11 

*  Longest  immature  female:  47  cm. 


These  rather  sparse  data  indicate  that  female  ratfish  mature  at 
lengths  between  41-47  cm,  and  that  fish  51  cm  and  over  are  always 
mature. 

It  was  not  possible  to  distinguish  any  stages  of  maturation  in  the 
male  gonads :  these  were  inconspicuous  and  showed  no  signs  of  sperm. 

The  state  of  the  female  gonads,  and  especially  the  male  gonads,  sug- 
gests that  reproduction  takes  place  several  months  before  or  after  the 
sampling  period  (February  1972).  At  any  rate,  no  ripe  animals  were 
taken.  Unfortunately,  none  of  the  fish  taken  in  June  or  August  1972, 
were  dissected. 

An  attempt  to  examine  the  stomach  contents  was  made,  but  this 
species  has  no  clearly  defined  stomach  and  the  area  which  corresponds 
to  the  stomach  in  other  fish  was  empty  in  the  fish  examined.  The  spiral 
valves  of  four  were  opened ;  while  three  of  these  were  empty,  the  fourth 
contained  what  appeared  to  be  some  sand. 


52 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 


V    o 


9 
o 
o 


E 

3 
Z 


n  n 


25 


35  40  45 

ToTol    Body     Length      cms. 


50 


55 


60 


FIGURE  3.     Size  frequency  distribution  of  the  males  and  females  of  Hydrolagus  collei. 
SHADED  BARS  =  MALES 


DISCUSSION  AND  CONCLUSIONS 

Ratfish  show  a  distinct  migratory  movement,  being  more  abundant 
and  more  widespread  in  the  northern  Gulf  of  California  in  February- 
March,  than  in  June-September.  They  do  not  appear  to  reproduce  dur- 
ing the  period  of  peak  abundance,  but  this  requires  further  investiga- 
tion. Females  predominate  in  the  catch  and  this  could  be  because  of 
greater  vulnerability  to  the  net,  as  females  are  on  the  average  larger, 
but  could  also  be  due  to  females  migrating  more  readily,  or  even  to  a 
natural  difference  in  sex  ratio.  However,  the  pattern  of  an  increasing 
proportion  of  females  in  larger  fish  is  a  very  widespread  one  and  on 
close  investigation  is  usually  found  to  be  accompanied  by  increasing 
mortality  selective  against  males.  There  is  no  good  reason  to  believe  this 
process  does  not  operate  on  the  Gulf  of  California  population  of  ratfish. 

The  cause  of  the  migratory  movements  of  ratfish  is  unknown,  but 
most  of  the  fish  species  in  the  northern  Gulf  of  California  are  more 
abundant  in  early  spring,  so  a  casual  agent  with  a  rather  generalized 
action  should  be  looked  for ;  quite  possibly  temperature,  oxygen  con- 
centration and  currents  are  of  great  importance. 

A  different  mesh  size  was  used  in  spring  1972  (4.5  cm)  and  June 
1971  (5.5  cm),  so  the  ratfish  caught  were  subject  to  different  net  vul- 
nerabilities at  different  sampling  periods.  However,  there  is  no  reason 
to  believe  that  the  marked  seasonal  differences  in  distribution  are 
caused  by  biased  sampling  arising  from  the  different  equipment  used, 


GULP  OF  CALIFORNIA  RATFISH  53 

as  the  material  collected  in  August-September  1971  was  also  collected 
with  the  finer  mesh  cod-end  (4.5  cm)  as  opposed  to  the  courser  mesh 
used  to  gather  the  material  collected  in  June  1971.  There  were  no  sig- 
nificant differences  in  distribution  or  abundance  recorded  between  June 
and  August  1971 ;  therefore,  the  change  in  mesh  size  did  not  signifi- 
cantly affect  the  vulnerability  to  the  net  of  the  fish  present. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

I  wish  to  acknowledge  the  help  of  the  Captain,  F.  Hernandez 
Ascensio,  and  crew  of  the  Alejandro  de  Humboldt  who  made  the  work 
of  collection  so  much  easier  and  more  agreeable  by  their  friendly 
participation.  I  also  wish  to  acknowledge  the  help  of  Biol.  H.  Chavez, 
Sr.  Humberto  Pedraza  and  T.  P.  Armando  Arias,  who  were  instru- 
mental in  helping  to  collect  the  data  on  which  this  paper  is  based. 

REFERENCES 

Johnson,  A.  G.,  and  Horton,  H.  F.  (1972).  "Length,  weight,  relationships,  food- 
habits,  parasite  and  sex  and  age  determinations  of  the  ratfish,  Hydrolagus  collei 
(Lay  and  Bernett)"  Fishery  Bulletin  70  (2)  :  1972. 


Calif.  Fish  and  Game  61(1)  :  54-63.     1975. 


NOTES 

AN  UNUSUALLY  FAST  GROWTH  RATE 
FOR  TILAPIA  ZILLII 

TUapia  zillii  is  an  herbivorous  cichlid  from  East  Africa,  and  it  is 
one  of  many  species  of  TUapia  introduced  into  the  United  States  for 
the  biological  control  of  aquatic  weeds  (SchefPer  1960;  Avault,  Smith- 
erman,  and  Shell  1968).  It  was  authorized  for  introduction  into  Cali- 
fornia waters  in  1971  (Pelzman  1973).  Any  successful  method  of  bio- 
logical control  of  aquatic  weeds  in  the  irrigation  systems  in  southern 
California  would  be  welcomed.  Large  sums  of  money  are  spent  annually 
for  the  mechanical  removal  of  aquatic  weeds  since  chemical  controls 
cannot  be  applied  because  irrigation  water  also  provides  the  potable 
water  supply. 

On  5  May  1972,  the  California  Department  of  Fish  and  Game  re- 
leased 250  T.  zillii  in  an  irrigation  drainage  ditch  near  the  southeastern 
edge  of  Imperial  Valley,  approximately  15  miles  east  of  Calexico,  Cali- 
fornia. No  other  T.  zillii  have  been  stocked  in  this  drainage  ditch  since 
the  initial  introduction.  At  the  time  of  stocking,  the  fish  averaged  5.7  g 
(5  per  oz)  (F.  G.  Hoover,  California  Department  of  Fish  and  Game, 
personal  communication)  and  approximately  70  mm  (2.75  inches)  (un- 
published data). 

Eecently,  nine  large  T.  zillii  were  captured  in  this  drain,  probably 
individuals  from  the  original  introduction.  They  were  collected  on  16 
January  and  13  March  1974  by  seining  and  throw-netting.  Scale 
samples  were  taken  from  a  dorso-lateral  location  near  the  base  of  the 
caudal  peduncle.  The  scales  were  mounted  between  two  glass  slides 
and  examined  with  a  binocular  microscope  at  10  power  magnification. 
Distances  between  annuli  were  measured  at  least  twice  with  an  ocular 
micrometer. 

The  specimens  ranged  from  257  to  315  mm  (10.1  to  12.4  inches)  tl 
and  weighed  380  to  709  g  (0.84  to  1.56  lb)  (Table  1).  All  were  2  years 
old.  Back-calculated  lengths  ranged  from  133  to  185  mm  (5.2  to  7.3 
inches)  and  averaged  164  mm  (6.5  inches)  at  the  end  of  the  first  year. 
At  the  end  of  the  second  year  of  growth,  the  range  w^as  225-300  mm 
(8.9  to  11.8  inches)  and  the  average,  249  mm  (9.8  inches). 

Chimits  (1957)  reported  a  faster  growth  rate  for  T  zillii,  but  most 
reports  indicate  that  this  species  requires  4  to  6  years  to  reach  approxi- 
mately 300  mm  (11.8  inches)  in  length  (El  Zarka  1961;  Fryer  and 
lies  1972).  Lowe  (McConnell)  (1955)  reported  a  2-year  old  T.  zillii 
weighing  765  g  (1.69  lb),  but  she  does  not  indicate  whether  the  fish 
grew  under  wild  or  cultured  conditions.  The  maximum  reported  length 
and  weight  for  T.  zillii  is  350  mm  (13.8  inches)  and  800  g  (1.76  lb), 
respectively,  (Chimits  1957)  although  there  is  a  single  report  of  one 
which  weighed  2948  g  (6.50  lb)  (Anon.  1955).  In  addition,  the  fish  I 
collected  grew  faster  than  nearly  all  TUapia  sp.  reported  by  lies  (1971) 
and  Fryer  and  lies  ( 1972 ) . 

(54) 


NOTES 


55 


The  largest  fish  I  collected  were  males.  Ben-Tuvia  (1959),  El  Bolock 
and  Koura  (1960),  El  Zarka  (1961)  and  Fryer  and  lies  (1972)  also 
reported  that  males  were  usually  longer  than  females,  particularly 
after  they  matured. 

Unfortunately,  this  growth  rate  does  not  represent  the  growth  rate 
of  all  T.  zillii  in  California  waters,  but  rather,  is  an  example  of  the 
growth  potential  of  this  species  when  released  into  an  environment 
with  a  long  growing  season,  little  competition,  and  abundant  food.  This 
growth  rate  most  likely  will  not  be  sustained  as  the  population  in- 
creases. 

TABLE  1. — Size  at  the  time  of  capture,  sex,  and  growth  of  Tilapla  zillii  in  a  south- 
ern California  irrigation  drainage  ditch. 


Sex 

Length 
(mm) 

Weight 
(g) 

Length  at  age 

Date 

I 

II 

13  Mtrch  1974 

M 
M 

M 
F 
M 

F 

F 

315 
301 
297 
290 
285 
280 
278 
271 
257 
286 
(11.3 
inches) 

709 
608 
595 
572 
522 
508 
587 
438 
380 
547 
(1.201b.) 

185 
161 
178 
133 
174 
171 
173 
157 
140 
164 
(6.5 
inches) 

300 

13  March  1974 

244 

13  March  1974 

242 

13  March  1974 

240 

13  March  1974 

253 

16  January  1974. 

245 

16  January  1974 

244 

13  March  1974 

244 

13  March  1974 

225 

Average 

249 

(9.8 
inches) 

REFERENCES 

Anonymous.  1955.  East  African  Freshwater  Fisheries  Research  Organization 
Annual  Report  1954/1955.  Uganda  Argus,  Ltd.,  Kampala.  1-40. 

Avault,  J.,  Jr.,  R.  Smitherman,  and  E.  Shell.  1968.  Evaluation  of  eight  species 
of  fish  for  aquatic  weed  control.  FAO  Fisheries  Report  44.  VII/E3 :  109-122. 

Ben-Tuvia,  A.  1959.  The  biology  of  the  cichlid  fishes  of  Lakes  Tiberias  and  Huleh. 
Bull.  Res.  Counc.  Israel.  8B :  153-188. 

Chimits,  P.     1957.     The  tilapias  and  their  culture.  FAO  Fisheries   Bull.  10(1)  : 
1-24. 

El  Bolock,  A.,  and  R.  Koura.  1960.  Age,  growth  and  breeding  season  of  Tilapia 
zillii  Gervais  in  Egyptian  experimental  ponds.  Notes  and  Memoirs  No.  49.  Alex- 
andria Institute  of  Hydrobiology  :  1-36. 

El  Zarka,  S.  1961.  Tilapia  fisheries  investigation  in  Egyptian  lakes.  II.  A 
biological  study  of  Tilapia  zillii  G.  in  Lake  Quarum,  Egypt,  U.A.R.  Notes  and 
Memoirs  No.  66.  Alexandria  Institute  of  Hydrobiology  :  1-44. 

Fryer,  G.,  and  T.  lies.  1972.  The  cichlid  fishes  of  the  great  lakes  of  Africa. 
Oliver  and  Boyd,  Edinburgh.  641  p.  ' 

lies,  T.  1971.  Ecological  aspects  of  growth  in  African  cichlid  fishes.  J.  Cons. 
Int.  Explor.  Mer.  33(3)  :  363-385. 

Lowe  (McConnell),  R.  1955.  Species  of  tilapia  in  East  African  dams,  with  a  key 
for  their  identification.  East  African  Agric.  Jour.  20(4)  :  256-262. 

Pelzman,  R.  1973.  A  review  of  the  life  history  of  Tilapia  zillii  with  a  reassess- 
ment of  its  desirability  in  California.  Inland  Fisheries  Admin.  Rep.  74-1 :  1-9. 

Scheffer,  P.  1960.  Factual  information  concerning  the  use  of  tilapia  in  the  bio- 
logical control  of  algae  and  aquatic  weeds  in  Arizona  farm  ponds,  reservoirs  and 
ditches.  U.  S.  Dep.  of  Agric.  Soil  Conserv.  Service.  Technical  Notes.  21  p. 


56 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 


William  J.  Hauscr,  University  of  Califortiia-Riverside,  Imperial  Valley 
Field  Station,  1004  East  Bolton  Road,  El  Centro,  CA  92243.  Funds 
for  this  and  related  research  were  provided  hy  Imperial  Irrigation 
District,  Coachella  Valley  County  Irrigation  District,  and  Palo  Verde 
Irrigation  District,  Research  Grant  Number  CAL/ICP.  Accepted 
June  1974. 

NOTES  ON  SOME  FISHES  COLLECTED  OFF  THE 
OUTER  COAST  OF   BAJA  CALIFORNIA 

The  12  fishes  listed  in  this  report  represent  geographic  range  ex- 
tensions, definite  collection  localities,  or  they  are  taken  so  infrequently 
as  to  warrant  a  published  record.  The  fishes  were  collected  by  the  au- 
thors aboard  the  Department  of  Fish  and  Game  research  vessel  Alaska. 
Previously  unpublished  data,  from  fish  collected  during  other  Depart- 
mental research  cruises,  are  also  included.  Latitudes  and  longitudes 
have  been  included  for  all  collecting  localities  (Table  1).  Miles  are  in 
nautical  miles. 

TABLE  1. — Latitudes  and  Longitudes  of  Localities  of  Capture 
(Arranged  from  North  to  South) 


Locality 


Latitude 


Longitude 


Baja  California 

Todos  Santos  Bay 

San  Martin  Island 

Pt.  Canoas 

rt.  Canoas  (33.3  km  W) 

Playa  Maria  Bay 

Sebastidn  Vizcaino  Bay  (27.8  km  SW  of  Playa 

Maria  Bay) 

Cedros  Island  (12.9  km  W.  of  northern  end) 

Cedros  Island  (17.6  km  NNW  of  northern  end) 

San  Benito  Islands 

Lagoon  Head 

Sebastidn  Vizcaino  Bay  (22  fathom  spot) 

Sebastidn  Vizcaino  Bay  (27.8  km  E.  of  Pt.  Eugenia) 

Turtle  Bay  (14.8  km  SW  of  Turtle  Bay) 

San  Cristobal  Bay 

San  Pablo  Point 

San  Hipoiito  Point  (11.1  km  SE) 


31°  46.6'  N. 
30°  28.8'  N. 
29°  44.0'  N. 
29°  27.8'  N. 
28°  56.2'  N. 

28°  49.7'  N. 
28°  23.7'  N. 
28°  21.2'  N. 
28°  20.3'  N. 
28°  14.9'  N. 
28°  6.0'  N. 
27°  50.0'  N. 
27°  36.2'  N. 
27°  22.4'  N. 
27°  12.9'  N. 
26°  52.0'  N. 


116°  45.3'  W. 
116°  2.7' W. 
115°  50.0'  W. 
115°  31.5'  W. 
114°  31.7'  W. 


114° 
115° 
115° 
115° 
114° 
114° 
114° 
115" 
114° 
114° 
113° 


48.2'  W. 
21.0'  W. 
17.9'  W. 
31.6'  W. 
5.5'  W. 
23.0'  W. 
50.0'  W. 
1.0' W. 
37.8'  W. 
30.5'  W. 
52.0'  W. 


Eptatretus  stoutii  (Lockington) — Pacific  hagfish 

On  three  separate  occasions,  a  total  of  four  Pacific  hagfish  was  cap- 
tured off  the  coast  of  central  Baja  California:  (i)  27.8  km  (15  miles) 
SW  of  Plava  Maria  Bav  on  October  2,  1970,  (ii)  33.3  km  (18  miles)  W 
of  Pt.  Canoas  on  October  3,  1970,  and  (iii)  on  June  21,  1971  o&  San 
Pablo  Point.  These  fish  ranged  from  178  to  420  mm  (7.0  to  16.5  inches) 
total  length  (tl).  Our  identification  was  confirmed  by  Carl  L.  Hubbs, 
Scripps  Institution  of  Oceanography,  La  Jolla,  California.  Two  of  these 
hagfish  taken  on  October  2  and  3,  1970,  are  now  in  the  ichthyological 
collection  at  Scripps  Institution  of  Oceanography  (SIO  73-373  and 
SIO  73-374).  The  hagfish,  taken  on  June  21,  1971,  is  catalogued  as 
SIO  71-164. 

E.  stoutii  also  was  captured  12.9  km  (7  miles)  W  of  the  northern  end 
of  Cedros  Island  in  278  to  281.6  m  (152  to  154  fm)  of  water  on  Janu- 
ary 17,  1959  by  John  Seapin.  This  previous  southern  limit  to  the  range 


NOTES  57 

was  never  published.  The  hagfish  captured  off  San  Pablo  Point  extends 
the  range  south  a  distance  of  approximately  148.3  km  (80  miles)  from 
off  Cedros  Island  to  San  Pablo  Point. 

Hexanchus  griseus  (Bonnaterre) — Sixgill  shark 

On  October  6,  1970,  a  sixgill  shark  measuring  850  mm  (33.6  inches) 
TL  was  captured  in  a  midwater  trawl  in  Todos  Santos  Bay.  The  trawl 
was  fished  from  surface  to  a  depth  of  14.6  m  (48  ft)  in  water  38.1  m 
(125  ft)  deep.  This  is  the  first  record  of  H.  griseus  from  Mexican 
waters.  The  specimen  is  deposited  in  the  Natural  History  Museum  of 
Los  Angeles  County  (LACM  31679-1). 

Hydrolagus  collie'i  (Lay  and  Bennett) — Raffish 

Six  raffish  were  collected  in  a  bottom  trawl  off  Point  Canoas  on 
June  26,  1971,  in  58.5  m  (32  fm)  of  water.  These  fish  ranged  from  370 
to  450  mm  (14.6  to  17.7  inches)  tl.  The  vertebral  column  of  a  small 
Hydrolagus  had  been  found  in  the  stomach  of  a  giant  sea  bass,  Stereo- 
lepis  gigas,  taken  at  the  "22  fathom  spot"  in  Sebastian  Vizcaino  Bay, 
two  days  earlier.  Unfortunately,  our  evidence  was  inadvertently  washed 
overboard.  Two  H.  colliei  were  captured  on  January  17,  1959,  approxi- 
mately 17.6  km  (9.5  miles)  NNW  of  northern  end  Cedros  Island  in 
182.9  to  183.2  m  (100  to  101  fm)  of  water.  These  two  specimens  were 
360  and  462  mm  (14.2  and  18.2  inches)  tl. 

The  occurrence  of  the  raffish  off  Cedros  Island  extends  the  range 
south  along  the  outer  coast  of  Baja  California  389.2  km  (210  miles) 
from  Santo  Tomas  to  Cedros  Island  and  evidently  Sebastian  Vizcaino 
Bay.  Although  the  specimens  captured  off  Point  Canoas  are  now  de- 
posited at  the  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County,  they 
have  not  been  catalogued  at  this  time. 

Anchoa  exigua  (Jordan  and  Gilbert) — "Anchovy" 

A  number  of  these  engraulids  was  collected  at  three  separate  localities 
in  Sebastian  Vizcaino  Bay.  Our  first  collection  was  made  27.8  km 
(15  miles)  E  of  Point  Eugenia  in  Sebastian  Vizcaino  Bay  on  October 
1,  1970,  where  the  fish  were  dip-netted  from  tide  pools.  The  subsequent 
capture  localities  were  at  Lagoon  Head  (Oct.  2,  1970)  and  Playa  Maria 
Bay  (Oct.  3,  1970).  These  fish  were  captured  by  beach  seine  and  ranged 
in  size  from  52  to  60  mm  (2.0  to  2.4  inches)  standard  length  (sl). 

Clearing  and  staining  facilitated  identification  of  these  fishes  and 
meristics  corroborated  with  those  given  by  Hildebrand  (1943).  Speci- 
mens from  the  above  collections  are  deposited  at  California  Academy  of 
Sciences  (CAS  28745  and  28746). 

These  fish  extend  the  known  range  northward  approximately  370.6 
km  (200  miles)  from  San  Juanico  Bay  (McHugh  and  Fitch  1951)  to 
Playa  Maria  Bay. 

Physiculus  rasfrelliger  Gilbert — Hundred-fathom  codling 

Eight  Physiculus  rastrelliger,  ranging  from  127  to  178  mm  (5.0  to 
7.0  inches)  sl,  were  captured  in  prawn  traps  on  June  21,  1971,  from  a 
depth  of  182.9  m  (100  fm)  off  San  Pablo  Point.  This  collection  is  near 
the  type  locality  for  this  species  as  reported  by  Fitch  and  Barker 
(1972).    Their   occurrence   seems   noteworthy,    however,    because   this 


58  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

species  is  by  no  means  common.  All  eight  specimens  (2  whole  and  6 
skeletonized)  are  now  deposited  at  the  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los 
Angeles  County  ( LACM  32755-1 ) . 

Anoplopoma  fimbria  (Pallas) — Sablefish 

Two  sablefish  were  captured  on  June  23,  1971,  in  prawn  traps  off 
San  Benito  Islands.  The  traps  were  set  in  219.4  m  (120  fm)  of  water 
and  these  fish  measured  380  and  403  mm  (14.9  and  15.9  inches)  sl. 
Fitch  and  Lavenberg  (1971)  note  Cedros  Island  as  the  southern  limit 
for  this  species.  San  Benito  Islands  are  at  a  latitude  equivalent  to 
Cedros  Island.  These  specimens  are  deposited  at  the  Natural  History 
Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County  (LACM  32700-1). 

Zaniolepis  latipinnis  Girard — Longspine  combfish 

Eleven  longspine  combfish  were  collected  in  a  bottom  trawl  off  San 
Cristobal  Bay  on  June  22,  1971.  The  specimens  ranged  from  65  to  150 
mm  (2.6  to  5.9  inches)  sl.  Fitch  (1953)  recorded  the  southern  limits  as 
2.8  km  (1.5  miles)  southwest  of  San  Martin  Island;  thus,  the  present 
specimens  extend  the  southern  limits  222  km  (120  miles). 

Zaniolepis  frenata  Eigenmann — Shortspine  combfish 

A  single  shortspine  combfish,  57  mm  (2.2  inches)  sl,  was  taken  14.8 
km  (8  miles)  SW  of  Turtle  Bay  in  a  midwater  trawl  on  June  22,  1971. 
The  specimen  captured  off  Turtle  Bay  extends  the  range  southward  a 
distance  of  105.5  km  (57  miles). 

Agonopsis  sterletus  (Gilbert) — Southern  spearnose 

Two  southern  spearnose  poachers  were  taken  in  a  bottom  trawl  SE  of 
San  Martin  Island.  These  fish  were  captured  at  a  depth  of  4.2  m  (23 
fm)  on  June  28,  1971,  and  measured  56  and  123  mm  (2.2  and  4.8 
inches)  sl. 

While  searching  for  other  individuals  of  this  species,  we  found  an 
A.  sterletus  deposited  at  the  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County  (LACM  20819)  which  had  been  captured  11.1  km  (6  miles)  SE 
of  San  Hipolito  Point.  This  fish  measured  106.5  mm  (4.2  inches)  sl  and 
was  netted  in  65.8  to  71.3  m  (36  to  39  fm)  of  water  on  April  29,  1950. 

Jordan  and  Everman  (1896)  report  the  southern  limit  for  this  species 
to  be  Los  Coronados  Islands.  The  capture  at  San  Hipolito  Point  extends 
the  range  southward  685.6  km  (370  miles). 

Epinephelus  niveatus  (Valenciennes) — Snowy  grouper 

A  snowy  grouper  was  captured  with  a  bottom  trawl  in  San  Cristobal 
Bay.  This  fish,  netted  at  a  depth  of  67.7  m  (37  fm)  on  June  22,  1971, 
measured  104  mm  (4.1  inches)  sl.  Although  this  capture  is  within  E. 
niveatus  range,  it  is  captured  so  infrequently,  that  this  netting  satis- 
fies much  needed  catch  localities  of  this  species.  This  fish  is  deposited  at 
California  Academy  of  Sciences  (CAS  28420). 

Parophrys  vetulus  Girard — English  sole 

Four  English  sole  were  caught  in  a  bottom  trawl  fished  at  a  depth  of 
67.7  m  (37  fm)  in  San  Cristobal  Bay  on  June  22,  1971.  These  fish 
ranged  from  119  to  147  mm  (4.7  to  5.8  inches)  sl.  The  southern  limit 
is  extended  from  Cedros  Island  approximately  92.5  km  (50  miles)  south- 
ward by  this  collection. 


NOTES  59 

Microstomus  pacificus  (Lockington) — Dover  sole 

Two  dover  sole,  158  and  203  mm  (6.2  and  8.0  inches)  sl,  were  cap- 
tured in  a  bottom  trawl  on  June  22,  1971,  in  San  Cristobal  Bay.  The 
southern  limit  of  this  speci'^s  has  been  recorded  as  San  Quintin  Bay, 
Baja  California  (Fitch  and  Lavenberg  1971),  and  Guadalupe  Island 
(Roedel  1953).  The  specimens  caught  in  San  Cristobal  Bay  extend  the 
known  range  over  185.3  km  (100  miles)  southward. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

The  authors  gratefully  acknowledge  the  assistance  of  Andrew 
Felando,  Frank  McCumiskey,  Earl  Andreassen,  and  the  rest  of  the 
crew  on  the  ALASKA.  We  especially  wish  to  express  our  thanks  to 
John  Fitch  for  his  field  notes  of  previously  unpublished  material  and 
his  suggestions  concerning  the  manuscript.  Mickey  Wolfe,  Pat  Barnett, 
and  Gayle  Jones  are  to  be  commended  for  their  patience  in  typing  our 
many  versions  of  this  paper. 

REFERENCES 

Fitch,    John    E.     1953.     Extensions   to    known   geographical    distributions    of    some 

marine  fishes  on  the  Pacific  coast.  Calif.  Fish  Game  39  (4)  :  539-552. 
Fitch,  John  E.,  and  L.  W.  Barker.     1972.     The  fish  family  Moridae  in  the  eastern 

north  Pacific  with  notes  on  morid  otoliths,  caudal  skeletons,  and  the  fossil  record. 

U.  S.  Nat.  Mar.  Fish.  Serv.,  Fish.  Bull.  70(3)  :  565-584. 
Fitch,  John  E.,  and  R.  J.  Lavenberg.     1971.     Marine  food  and  game  fishes  of  Cali- 
fornia. Univ.  of  Calif.  Press,  Berkeley.  179  p. 
Hildebrand,   Samuel  F.     1943.     A  review  of  the  American   anchovies    (family   En- 

graulidae).  Bingham  Oceanogr.  Collection,  Bull.  8(2)  :  1-165. 
Jordan,   David   S.,   and   B.   W.   Evermann.     1896.     A    check-list   of   the   fishes   and 

fish-like  vertebrates  of  North  and  Middle  America.  U.  S.  Comm.  Fish.  Kept,  for 

1895  :  207-584. 
McHugh,  J.  L.,  and  J.  E.  Fitch.     1951.     An  annotated  list  of  the   clupeoid  fishes 

of  the  Pacific  coast,  from  Alaska  to  Cape  San  Lucas,  Baja  California.  Calif.  Fish 

Game  37(4)  :  491-495. 
Roedel,   Phil  M.     1953.     Common  ocean  fishes  of  the  California  coast.  Calif.  Dep. 

Fish  and  Game,  Fish  Bull.   (91)  :  1-184. 

Eric  H.  Knaggs,  John  S.  Sunada  and  Robert  N.  Lea,  Marine  Resources 
Region,  California  Dcpariment  of  Fish  and  Game,  350  Golden  Shore, 
Long  Beach,  Calif.  90802.  Robert  N.  Lea's  present  address,  University 
of  Miami,  Rosenstiel  School  of  Marine  and  Atmospheric  Sciences, 
10  Rickenhacker  Causeway,  Miami,  Florida  33149.  This  study  was 
conducted  in  cooperation  with  the  Department  of  Commerce,  National 
Oceanic  and  Atmospheric  Administration,  National  Marine  Fisher- 
ies Service,  under  Public  Law  88-309,  Project  6-3-R.  Accepted  Au- 
gust 1974. 


OCCURRENCE  OF  THE   PROWFISH  ZAPRORA  SILENUS 
JORDAN,   1896  IN  MONTEREY  BAY,  CALIFORNIA 

On  the  morning  of  October  15,  1973,  a  50.1  cm  (19.8  inch)  Standard 
Length  (sl)  specimen  of  the  rare  proA\-fish,  Zaprora  silcnus  Jordan, 
1896  was  collected  by  John  Fumotara  on  the  trawler  New  Janet  Ann. 
It  was  taken  at  118  m  (390  ft)  on  the  north  shelf  of  the  Monterey- 
Submarine  Canyon  at  lat  36°  50'  N,  long  121°  59'  W.  This  represents 
a  southward  range  extension  of  approximately  161  km  (100  miles) 
since  it  has  recently  been  reported  from  Bodega  Bay  (Fitch  and  Laven- 
berg  1971 ;  Miller  and  Lea  1972) . 

The  specimen  was  brought  to  the  vertebrate  museum  at  the  Moss 
Landing  Marine  Laboratories  where  all  measurements,  counts  and 
photographs  were  taken.  It  has  subsequently  been  deposited  in  the 
ichthyology  collection  at  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences  (CAS 
30693). 

Information  on  the  monotypic  prowfish  is  scarce  because  most  refer- 
ences consist  chiefly  of  notes  on  range  extensions,  some  with  meristic 
and  morphometric  data  presented  (Kendall  1914;  Dymond  1928; 
Schultz  1934;  Scheffer  1940;  Schultz  and  Haryey  1945).  However, 
Chapman  and  Townsend  (1938)  reviewed  the  osteology  and  early  life 
history  of  the  prowfish  based  on  36  specimens  collected  in  the  north- 
east Pacific  off  Washington,  British  Columbia  and  Alaska.  Fitch  and 
Lavenberg    (1971)    presented  natural  history  notes  summarizing  the 


TABLE  1. — Meristic  and  morphometric  data  from  Zaprora  silenus  (CAS  30693). 


Measurements 


Total  length.- ..- 

Standard  length  (SL) 

Head  length  (HL) 

Body  depth 

Bony  interorbital  space 

Snout  length 

Orbit  diameter - 

Maxillary  length 

Depth  caudal  peduncle 

Predorsal  length 

Preanal  length 

Length  longest  pectoral  ray 


cm 


50.1 
41.8 

8.7 
11 

3 

2 

1 

3 

4 

7 
23 


8.0 


%SL 


119.9 


20.8 
27.8 

8. 

4. 

4. 

7. 
11, 
17.0 
56.5 
19.1 


.9 
.8 
.1 
.9 
.2 


%HL 


575.9 
480.5 

133.3 
42.5 
23.0 
19.5 
37.9 
54.0 
81.6 

271.3 
91.6 


Counts 


Dorsal  fin  rays. . 

Anal  fin  rays 

Pelvic  fin  rays.. 
Pectoral  fm  rays 
Branchiostegals. 
Gill  rakers 


LVI 
IV  26 

absent 
23 
6 

8-18 


(60) 


NOTES  61 

known  information  on  this  species.  McAllister  and  Krejsa  (1961) 
reviewed  its  enigmatic  taxonomic  position,  finally  placing  the  family 
Zaproridae  in  the  superfamily  Stichaeoidae.  Greenwood  et  al.  (1966) 
have  further  placed  the  family  in  the  suborder  Blennioidei.  Because 
little  is  known  of  this  fish,  even  where  it  is  more  abundant  to  the 
north,  the  specimen  was  examined  in  detail  to  contribute  as  much 
information  to  its  life  history  as  possible. 

The  meristic  and  morphometric  data  (Table  1)  compare  favorably 
with  published  information  on  northern  specimens  (Kendall  1914;  Dy- 
mond  1928;  Chapman  and  Townsend  1938;  Scheffer  1940)  with  the 
exception  that  our  specimen,  when  carefully  dissected  and  examined 
by  X-ray,  had  four  anal  spines  and  26  soft  rays. 

The  right  sagitta  (otolith)  was  removed  and  measured  4.1  mm  across 
its  longest  axis  and  exhibited  three  winter  rings,  with  the  last  on  the 
distal  margin  not  quite  complete,  indicating  that  this  fish  was  in  its 
third  year.  As  determined  by  serial  sections  of  the  gonad,  our  specimen 
was  found  to  be  an  immature  female  with  developing  ova,  indicating 
the  possibility  of  spawning  during  the  next  season.  Thus  our  specimen 
would  probably  have  spawned  in  its  fourth  year,  which  agrees  with 
growth  zone  readings  on  the  otolith  from  a  33-inch  male  by  Fitch  and 
Lavenberg  (1971).  All  of  the  juvenile  specimens  of  Zaprora  caught  by 
Chapman  and  Townsend  (1938)  off  Alaska  were  taken  during  the 
months  of  May,  June  and  July,  which  may  indicate  a  seasonality  to 
their  spawning  habits,  and  thus  a  seasonality  in  the  abundance  of 
young  prowfish  in  the  plankton. 

The  stomach  of  our  specimen  was  empty  but  the  intestine  contained 
the  remains  of  nine  hyperiid  amphipods.  No  trace  was  found  of  jelly- 
fish remains  as  reported  by  Fitch  and  Lavenberg  (1971).  No  external 
or  gill  parasites  were  present.  The  specimen  showed  no  unusual  colora- 
tion, appearing  uniform  grayish  blue  with  a  slightly  lighter  ventral 
surface,  and  very  noticeable  light  blue  head  pores, 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
We  wish  to  thank  John  Fumotara  for  bringing  us  this  interesting 
fish,  and  James  Gordon,  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  for  providing 
a  radiograph  of  the  specimen  for  our  counts. 

REFERENCES 

Chapman,  W.  M.,  and  L.  D.  Townsend.  1938.  The  osteology  of  Zaprora  silenus 
Jordan,  with  notes  on  its  distribution  and  early  life-history.  Ann.  Mag.  Xatur. 
Hist.  Ser.  11.  2(8)  :  89-117. 

Dymond,  J.  R.  1928.  Another  prowfish  {Zaprora  silenus)  record.  Copeia 
(169)  :  88-89. 

Fitch,  J.  E.,  and  R.  J.  Lavenberg.  1971.  Marine  food  and  game  fishes  of  Cali- 
fornia.    Univ.  of  Calif.  Press,  Berkeley  and  Los  Angeles,  179  pp. 

Greenwood,  P.  H.,  D.  E.  Rosen,  S.  H.  Weitzman,  and  G.  S.  Myers.  1966.  Phy- 
letic  studies  of  teleostean  fishes,  with  a  provisional  classification  of  living  forms. 
Am.  Mus.  Nat.  Hist.,  Bull.,  131(4)  :  341^55. 

Kendall,  W.  C.     1914.     A  new  record  for  the  prowfish.     Copeia  (12)  :  1-2. 

McAllister,  D.  E.,  and  R.  J.  Krejsa.  1961.  Placement  of  the  prowfishes,  Zapro- 
ridae, in  the  superfamily  Stichaeoidae.  Can.  Nat.  Mus.,  Natur.  Hist.  Pap. 
(11): 1-4. 

Miller,  D.  J.,  and  R.  N.  Lea.  1972.  Guide  to  the  coastal  marine  fishes  of  Cali- 
fornia.    Calif.  Dept.  Fish  and  Game,   Fish  Bull.    (157)  :  1-235. 


62  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

Scheffer,   V.   B.     1940.     Two   recent   records   of  Zaprora   siletius   Jordan    from   the 

Aleutian  Islands.     Copeia  1940(3)  :  203. 
Schultz,  L.  P.     1934.     Zaprora  silenus  Jordan  from  Alaska.     Copeia   1934(2)  :  98. 
Schultz,    L.    P.,    and    E.    W.    Harvey.     1945.     The    flaccid    fish,    Zaprora    silenus, 

from  off  Newport,  Oregon.     Copeia  1945(4)  :  237. 

— Gregor  M.  Cailliet  and  M.  Eric  Anderson,  Moss  Landing  Marine 
Laboratories,  Moss  Landing,  California  95039.  Accepted  September, 
1974. 


BOOK  REVIEWS 

Endemism  in  Fishes  of  the  Clear  Lake  Region  of  Central  California 

By  John  D.  Hopkirk;  University  of  California  Press,  Berkeley,  1973;  135  p.,  illustrated  in 
black-and-white  photos. 

The  largest  freshwatfer  fish  province  within  California  is  the  Sacramento  province. 
The  Clear  Lake  region  studied  by  Hopkirk  encompasses  all  or  part  of  7  of  the  10 
districts  within  this  province.  It  extends  from  50-60  miles  north  and  east  of  Clear 
Lake,  to  the  Golden  Gate  on  the  south  and  the  Pacific  Coast  on  the  west. 

Citing  fluviolacustine  speciation,  the  Clear  Lake  minnow  {Endemichthys  grandi- 
pinnis),  the  Clear  Lake  splittail  (Pogonichthys  ciscoides),  the  Clear  Lake  hitch 
{Lavinia  exilicauda  chi) ,  and  the  Clear  Lake  tuleperch  {Hysterocarpus  traskii 
lagunae)  are  described  from  the  Clear  Lake  basin,  as  is  an  unnamed  subspecies  of 
Cottus  asper.  In  addition,  the  tuleperch  of  the  Russian  River  subprovince  is  now 
recognized  as  a  new  subspecies,  H.  t.  porno. 

According  to  the  author,  the  evidence  from  the  fish  fauna  can  now  be  added  to 
that  of  the  moUuscan  fauna,  and  that  of  the  flora,  in  support  of  the  thesis  that  the 
Clear  Lake  area  is  a  center  of  endemism.  There  will  be  arguments,  however,  as  to 
the  strength  of  this  evidence.  The  differences  between  these  "endemics"  and  that 
of  their  extrabasin  congeners  is  small  and  the  argument  can  be  raised  that,  for 
example,  P.  ciscoides  deserves  no  more  than  subspecific  recognition. 

Endemichthys  grandipinnis.  a  new  genus  and  species,  is  based  upon  12  specimens 
collected  in  1939  and  1940.  The  characteristics  that  distinguish  this  taxon  from  re- 
lated taxa  are  minor  indeed,  and  one  might  conclude  we  are  dealing  with  hybrids 
grandipinnis,  between  Lavinia  exilicauda  and  Orthodon  microlepidotus,  as  earlier 
workers  who  examined  this  material  have  done.  No  less  an  authority  than  Dr.  Carl 
L.  Hubbs,  however,  reportedly  agrees  with  the  author's  diagnosis. 

In  any  event,  the  author  has  compiled  a  considerable  amount  of  data  on  native 
fishes  of  the  Clear  Lake  region  and  their  distribution.  Particularly  valuable  is  a 
listing  of  these  fish  (exclusive  of  Petromyzontidac,  Acipenseridae,  and  Salmonidae) 
in  the  collections  of  7  ichthyological  museums  through  about  1966.  The  systematic 
discussion  of  each  genus  and  species  is  especially  detailed,  but  I  would  like  to  have 
seen  more  graphical  and  statistical  treatment  of  the  data  presented,  particularly 
where  the  new  species  and  subspecies  are  concerned.  The  sections  on  geology,  bio- 
geography  and  zonation  of  fishes  are  brief  but  informative. 

Not  since  Snyder's  work  on  the  fishes  of  the  Lahontan  system  has  there  been  a 
comprehensive  treatment  ©f  the  native  fishes  of  a  major  California  region.  Regard- 
less of  whether  or  not  one  agrees  with  its  taxonomic  conclusions,  it  is  a  welcome 
addition  to  the  sparce  taxonomic  literature  on  California's  native  freshwater  fishes. 
— Stephen  J.  Nicola 

Western  Trout  Fly  Tying  Manual 

By  Jack  Dennis;  Snake  River  Books,  Jackson  Hole,  WY  1974;  258  p.,  illustrated.  $6.95 

Finally,  a  book  about  western  fly  patterns !  The  "west"  in  this  case  means  Mon- 
tana, Wyoming,  Idaho,  and  Colorado  but  the  patterns  described  include  many  pat- 
terns commonly  used  in  California. 

Jack  Dennis  has  written  an  extremely  useful  "How-to"  book  for  both  the  beginner 
and  the  more  advanced  tyer.  Over  sixty  patterns  are  detailed  in  the  Manual :  Drys, 
wets,  streamers,  nymphs,  and  a  special  section  on  hair  flies  for  our  more  turbulent 
western  waters. 

The  origin  of  each  fly  is  briefly  described,  the  most  commonly  used  sizes  listed, 
and  information  on  how  it  would  be  fished  is  often  illustrated  with  a  personal 
experience.  A  detailed  list  of  materials  is  provided  and  finally,  step-by-step  photo- 
graphs (black  and  white)  of  the  actual  tying  process.  As  always,  a  picture  is  worth 
a  thousand  words ;  the  photos  are  clear,  the  proportions  obvious,  and  the  photo 
of  the  finished  fly  gives  the  novice  tyer  something  to  shoot  at. 

The  Manual  also  has  a  brief  chapter  on  materials  and  tools,  a  chapter  on  special 
fly  tying  techniques,  and  a  special  section  on  the  use  of  the  whip  finishing  tool.  The 
author  explains  what  equipment  and  hooks  he  prefers,  and  tells  where  they  can  be 
obtained.  Far  too  infrequently  do  authors  provide  enough  information  on  brand 
names  and  sources  of  supply  ;  this  feature  will  be  appreciated  by  the  beginning  tyer. 

The  Western  Trout  Fly  Tying  Manual  is  available  in  paperback  at  a  price  of 
$6.95 ;  there  is  also  a  special  limited  edition,  signed  and  numbered  by  the  author 
for  $35.00. — K.  A.  Hashagen,  Jr. 

(63) 
A87003 — 800     11-74     5M 


INSTRUCTIONS  TO  AUTHORS 

EDITORIAL   POLICY 

The  editorial  staff  will  consider  for  publication  original  articles  and 
notes  dealing  with  the  conservation  of  the  fauna  and  flora  of  California 
and  its  adjacent  ocean  waters.  Authors  may  submit  two  copies,  each, 
of  manuscript,  tables,  and  figures  for  consideration  at  any  time, 

MANUSCRIPTS:  Authors  should  refer  to  the  CBE  Style  Mamial  (third 
edition)  for  general  guidance  in  preparing  their  manuscripts.  Some 
major  points  are  given  below. 

1.  Typing — ^All  material  submitted,  including  headings,  footnotes, 
and  references  must  be  typewritten  double-spaced  on  white  bond 
paper.  Papers  shorter  than  10  typewriten  pages,  including  tables, 
should  follow  the  format  for  notes. 

2.  Citations — ^All  citations  should  follow  the  name-and-year  system. 
The  "library  style"  will  be  followed  in  listing  references. 

3.  Abstracts — Each  paper  will  be  introduced  by  a  short,  concise 
abstract.  It  should  immediately  follow  the  title  and  author's  name 
and  be  indented  at  both  margins  to  set  it  off  from  the  body  of  the 
paper. 

4.  Abbreviations  and  numerals — ^Use  approved  abbreviations  as  listed 
in  the  CBE  Style  Mamwil,  In  all  other  cases  speU  out  the  entire 
word, 

TABLES:  Each  table  should  be  typewritten  double-spaced  throughout 
with  the  heading  centered  at  the  top.  Number  tables  with  arable 
numerals  and  place  them  together  in  the  manuscript  following  the 
references.  Use  only  horizontal  rules.  See  a  recent  issue  of  California 
Fish  and  Game  for  format. 

FIGURES:  Submit  figures  at  least  twice  final  size  so  they  may  be  reduced 
for  publication.  Usable  page  size  is  4f  inches  by  7f  inches.  All  figures 
should  be  tailored  to  this  proportion.  Photographs  should  be  sub- 
mitted on  glossy  paper  with  strong  contrasts.  AU  figures  should  be 
identified  with  the  author's  name  in  the  upper  left  corner  and  the 
figure  number  in  the  upper  right  corner.  Markings  on  figures  should 
be  in  blue  pencil  or  grease  pencil,  as  this  color  does  not  reproduce  on 
copyfilm.  Figure  captions  must  be  typed  on  a  separate  sheet  headed  by 
the  title  of  the  paper  and  the  author 's  name. 

PROOF  AND  REPRINTS:  Galley  proof  will  be  sent  to  authors  approxi- 
mately 60  days  before  publication.  Fifty  reprints  will  be  provided  free 
of  charge  to  authors.  Additional  copies  may  be  ordered  through  the 
editor  at  the  time  the  proof  is  submitted. 


s 


w 

c 

ii 

■0 

> 

§5 

-o  n 

-N  Q 

>  -t 

>o  — 

m 

-i^