fJli h r t s
N /^
ua b JFrcSVr ISarkinf iish
- o-r^-
dijriuttti7 (^ n
1893
, /
/ curv-v-tl y
HISTORY
CATHOLIC CHURCH OF SCOTLAND
V,' I
HISTORY
OF THE
Catholic Cfturdt of
FROM THE INTRODUCTION OF CHRISTIANITY
TO THE PRESENT DAY
BY
ALPHONS BELLESHEIM, D.D.
CANON OF A1X-LA-CHAPELLE
TRANSLATED, WITH NOTES AND ADDITIONS,
BY
D. OSWALD HUNTER BLAIR, O.S.B.
MONK OF FORT AUGUSTUS
IN FOUR VOLUMES
VOL. IV.
FROM THE ACCESSION OP CHARLES THE FIRST TO THE RESTORATION
OF THE SCOTTISH HIERARCHY, A.D. 1625-1878
WILLIAM BLACKWOOD AND SONS
EDINBURGH AND LONDON
M D C C C X C
(y
tin
All Rights reserved
TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE.
FEW words are necessary in presenting to the Eng
lish reader the concluding volume of the History
of the Catholic Church of Scotland. Among the
friendly criticisms which have appeared on the pre
ceding portions of the work, not a few have dwelt
with special commendation on the proofs of original
research which they have been kind enough to
discover in its pages. Notwithstanding these com
pliments, no one can be better aware than the trans
lator that the greater part of Dr Bellesheim's
carefully compiled work has no pretensions to rank
as original. The originality of a subject, an emi
nent writer l has told us, lies in its treatment ; and
the German historian may perhaps so far claim the
distinction in question, as having been the first to
produce, chiefly from materials already at hand, a
Disraeli.
VI TRANSLATORS PREFACE.
readable, consecutive, and, it is believed, trustworthy
history of Scottish Catholicism. Original history,
in the strict sense of the term, it certainly is not ;
and the translator deems it the more necessary to
make this disclaimer, inasmuch as the process of
translation has made doubly apparent the great
indebtedness of the author to non- Catholic writers
an indebtedness which, writing for German readers,
he has not in every case thought it necessary to
acknowledge.
The above remarks, it must be said, apply chiefly
to those portions of the work which have already
appeared, and which are principally concerned with
the pre-Keformation period of the Scottish Church.
In the present volume, which covers the darkest
and most gloomy epoch in her history, the author
has, as will be seen, availed himself to much greater
extent of hitherto unexplored sources of information.
No one who has the courage to attack the vast
indigesta moles of correspondence and reports which
are buried in the archives of Propaganda at Borne,
should be refused a tribute of gratitude from stu
dents of the ecclesiastical history of the last three
centuries; and Dr Bellesheim has certainly earned
that gratitude by his labours in disinterring the
interesting documents which will be found in the
Appendix to the present volume. It is on these
documents, which the translator has thought it best
to reproduce in an English dress, rather than in the
TRANSLATORS PREFACE. Vll
Latin or Italian originals, that a great part of the
narrative in the text has been based ; and it is to
them that it owes its interest as an undoubtedly
authentic record of the Catholic Church in this
country, at a time when, under the grinding pressure
of the penal laws, she was apparently all but extinct.
In the freedom which the tolerance, or indifference,
of our own days has accorded to every form of re
ligious belief, it is hard to realise the fierce fanati
cism that prevailed in Scotland little more than a
century ago : when the clergy of the ancient Church
were hunted down like wild beasts among the glens
and mountains, for no other crime than ministering
to the spiritual wants of their flocks, and when so
zealous and enlightened a prelate as Bishop Hay
deemed it necessary, for prudence' sake, to prohibit
so much as the singing of a hymn in the miserable
cabins which then did duty for Catholic chapels. The
letters addressed by the Scottish vicars-apostolic to
the Holy See partake to some extent of the inevit
able formality of all official reports : the writers
employed a language not their own, and alike in the
matter and manner of their narratives there may be
traced signs of that cautious reticence in which the
adherents of a proscribed religion were forced to
shroud every external manifestation of their faith.
But the details which those narratives give are full
of instruction ; and they will be perused with in
terest, not only by those who in happier times pro-
vni TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE.
fess the same faith which animated those devoted
pastors, but by all who are interested in the religi
ous history of their country.
OSWALD HUNTER BLAIR, O.S.B.
ST BENEDICT'S ABBEY,
FORT AUGUSTUS, N.B., November 1890.
CONTENTS OF THE FOURTH VOLUME.
CHAPTER I.
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND UNDER CHARLES I.
AND THE COMMONWEALTH (1625-1660).
Accession of Charles I. (March 27, 1625)— Royal visit to Scotland
—Collision with the Presbyterians — The Service-Book in St
Giles'— The National Covenant — The Assembly takes up arms
— The Solemn League and Covenant — Charles surrendered by
the Scotch — His trial and execution (January 1649) — Scottish
Catholics under Charles I. and Cromwell— Rigour of the penal
laws — Catholics before the Privy Council — Lord Huntly and
the Catholics — Royal proclamations — Imposition of religious
tests— Treatment of Lady Abercorn— Confiscation of property
— Enforced Protestant education — Proceedings against Cath
olics in the north — Widespread suffering among Catholics —
Ladies not exempt from the penal laws — Instances of royal
clemency— Protest by the Kirk— Appeal to the queen by Ur
ban VIII.— Persecuting zeal of the ministers — Death of Lord
Huntly (June 1636)— Acts of vandalism committed by the
Kirk — Crusade against Catholic traditions — Victims of the
penal laws — Measures against the clergy — Richard Smith,
vicar-apostolic of Great Britain — His difficulties and resigna
tion — Need of a missionary superior in Scotland — William
Ballantyne appointed prefect-apostolic (1653) — His labours,
imprisonment, and death (1661) — State of Scotland under
Cromwell — Conversions to Catholicism — Secular priests on the
mission — Blakhal, Phillip, Chalmers, Robertson, Cone — Cone
x CONTENTS.
and Charles I.— Peculiar attitude of the king— Scotch College
founded at Madrid (1633)— Transferred to Valladolid- Jesuits
on the mission— Report of Father Mambrecht— Irish Francis
cans in Scotland— Conversions in the Highlands— Report of
Father Hegerty— Subsidy from Propaganda— Capuchin mis
sionaries — Epiphanius Lindsay and Archangel Leslie — F.
Archangel's account of his labours — Benedictines and the
Scotch mission — Lazarist missionaries in the Hebrides— Crom
well and the Kirk— Moral and religious state of Scotland (1650),
CHAPTEE II.
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND UNDER CHARLES II.,
JAMES II., AND WILLIAM AND MARY (l 660-1702).
Restoration of Charles II. (May 1660)— His marriage to Catherine
of Braganza (1662)— Catholic leanings of the king— His inter
course with M. Olier— Mission from Charles to Pope Alexander
VII.— Royal favour towards Catholics— Plan of reunion with
the Holy See — Deathbed reconciliation of the king to the
Church — Ecclesiastical policy of Charles — Episcopalianism
restored .in Scotland (1662)— Hostility of the Presbyterians-
Murder of Archbishop Sharp (1679)— Rise of the Cameronians
—Condition of the Scottish Catholics— Citations before the
Privy Council— Measures against leading Catholics— Children
of Catholics separated from -their parents— Vigorous proceed
ings in Aberdeenshire— Missionaries in Scotland at the Restor
ation— Winster prefect-apostolic (1662-94)— His report to Pro
paganda (1668)— The Scottish calendar— Support of the clergy
—Clerical vocations— Obstacles in the way of the mission-
Reform needed in the foreign colleges— John Walker, prefect
pro tern. (1668-71)— Scotch professors at Padua— Leslie, Prince-
Bishop of Laybach— Sufferings of the clergy at the Revolution
—Jesuits on the mission— Alexander Leslie appointed visitor—
His report and suggestions— Result of the visitation— Clerical
conference at Speymouth— Proposed appointment of a bishop
-Accession of James II. (February 1685)— Edicts of toleration
-Mass at Holyrood— Popular discontent in Edinburgh— Revo
lution of 1688— Consequences to Scottish Catholics— Sack of
Holyrood and flight of Lord Perth — Distinguished Scottish
converts— Mob violence against Catholics— Raids on congrega
tions—Sufferings of the missionaries— Enactment of fresh penal
CONTEXTS. XI
laws — Thomas Nicolson named vicar - apostolic for Scotland
(August 1694)— His first report to Propaganda — Number of
missionaries in the country — Episcopal visitation of the High
lands — Condition of Scotland in 1700, . . . .89
CHAPTER III.
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND FROM 1700 TO 1760.
Death of William III. (March 1702) — Results of the accession of
Anne — Union of England and Scotland (1707) — The penal
laws under Anne — Protestant demonstration in Edinburgh —
Royal proclamation against Catholics — Statistics of the Church
in Scotland — Rising In Dumfriesshire — Consequences of the
Jacobite rebellion (1715) — Arrest of Bishop Wallace — Protes
tant missionary efforts — The Statuta Missionis of Bishop Nic
olson — Foundation of the seminary of Scalan (1712) — Benedic
tine seminary at Ratisbon — Bishop Nicolson's visitation of the
Highlands (1701) — Proposed erection of a chapter for Scotland
— Bishop Gordon, coadjutor (1705) — His services to the Church
in Scotland — Death of Bishop Nicolson (1718) — Bishop John
Wallace — Report of Bishop Gordon — Popular hostility to
Catholics — Constancy of clergy and people — The Church in the
Highlands — Formation of a Highland vicariate (172G) — Nomi
nation and singular disappearance of Alexander Grant — Con
secration of Hugh Macdonald, first vicar-apostolic of the High
lands — Second Jacobite rising (1745) — Bishop Macdonald and
Charles Edward — Collapse of the Jacobite hopes — Benedict
Henry, Cardinal of York — Sufferings of the Scottish Catholics
after Culloden — Capture and trial of Bishop Macdonald — Low
land vicariate — Dissensions among the clergy — Bishop Smith's
proposals to Propaganda — Relations of the bishops to the regu
lar clergy — Bishop Grant, coadjutor — Spread of the Jansenistic
heresy — Papal briefs on the subject — Formula drawn up by the
bishops — Clement XII. orders its subscription by all the mis
sionaries — State of the Scotch College at Paris — Report of
Niccol6 Lercari (1737) — Charges against the officials of the Col
lege — Jansenism in Scotland — Lercari's recommendations —
Result of his representations — Renewed complaints against the
College at Paris — Reply of the superiors — Contemporary
reports on the subject, . . . . . .156
Xll CONTENTS.
CHAPTER IV.
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND PROM 1760 TO 1800.
Birth (1729) and training of George Hay — Assists the wounded at
Prestonpans — His imprisonment in London — His conversion to
Catholicism— Ordained priest in Rome — Enters the Scottish
mission — His growing reputation — Consecrated bishop (1769)
— His work for religion in Scotland — Persecution of Catholics
in Uist — Firmness displayed by the islanders — Efforts of Bishop
Hay on their behalf— State of the Scotch College, Douai—
Scotch Church property in France — Douai under the Revolu
tion — Bishop Hay founds the seminary of Aquhorties — His
literary labours — New edition of the Bible — His ' Letters on
Usury ' — The ' Scripture Doctrine of Miracles ' — Reply of Mr
Abernethy — The ' Sincere Christian,' &c.— Suppression of the
Society of Jesus (1773)— The Scotch bishops claim the admin
istration of the Jesuit property — Catholic statistics in 1779 —
Summary of t,he penal statutes — Bishop Hay's efforts for their
repeal — Popular fanaticism in Scotland — Protest of the Kirk
against Catholic relief — No-Popery riots in Glasgow and Edin
burgh—Bishop Hay's house destroyed— Support of the Relief
Bill by Protestants — Principal Robertson — Pastoral issued by
Bishop Hay — Loyal Catholic address to George III. — Memorial
drawn up by Bishop Hay — Wilkes and Burke support the
cause of the Scottish Catholics — Compensation granted by the
magistrates — Gordon Riots (1780) — Outrages on members of
Parliament — Pillage of Catholic chapels — Introduction and
enactment of the Scotch Relief Bill (1793)— Gratitude of Scot
tish Catholics — Pastoral labours of Bishop Hay — Consecrations
of Bishops Alexander Macdonald and Geddes (1780) — State of
the Scotch College, Rome— Bishop Hay visits Rome (1781)—
Proposed amendments to the Statuta Missionis — Report of the
bishop on the condition of the Scotch College, Paris— Results
of his visit to Rome — Sanction of the amended statutes — Rec
torship of the College at Rome— Subsidy from Propaganda to
the Scottish Mission — Promise of a Government grant — The
Catholic oath proposed by Pitt— Its condemnation by the Scot
tish bishops— Failure to secure national rectors for the Scotch
College, Rome— Cardinal Charles Erskine— Grave complaints
against the Scotch College at Paris— Break-up of the College
CONTENTS. Xlll
at Paris — Death of Bishops Macdonald and Geddes — Position
of Scottish Catholics at the end of the eighteenth century-
Influence of Presbyterianism — Tyranny of the Kirk, . .212
CHAPTEK Y.
THE CHURCH IX THE NINETEENTH CENTURY, TO THE RE-
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE HIERARCHY (1800-1878).
State of Europe at the opening of the nineteenth century— Eng
land and Napoleon— Emigrant French clergy in England-
Welcome accorded to them — Their employment on the Scottish
mission Progress of the Church in Scotland — Ecclesiastical
statistics (1800) — Report of Bishop Hay (1804) — Bishop
Cameron appointed to the Lowland vicariate— Death of Bishop
Hay (1811)— The Church in the Highlands— Emigration to
Canada— Father Alexander Macdonell— Development of the
Church in Scotland, 1800-1829— Father Andrew Scott and The
Protestant— Catholic statistics, 1829— Erection of a third vicari
ate by Leo XII.— The Emancipation Bill— Feeling against it
in Scotland— Enactment of the measure (March 1829)— Posi
tion of Catholics after Emancipation— Remaining disabilities—
The Annuity-tax — Compulsory publication of banns — Founda
tion of Blairs College— St Margaret's Convent, Edinburgh-
State of the Church in 1832— Poverty of the clergy— The
Cardinal of York— His legacy to the Church in Scotland-
Bishop James Gillis— Visits France and Germany— His efforts
on behalf of the Scotch Abbey at Ratisbon— Representations of
the Scottish bishops to the Bavarian Government— Suppres
sion of the monastery (1862)— The Colleges at Douai and Paris
— Return of religious orders to Scotland — Consecration of
Bishop Strain— Internal dissensions in the Church— Effects of
the Irish emigration — The Glasgow Free Press— Visitation and
report of Archbishop Manning— Mgr. Eyre appointed to the
Western District (1868) — Project for the restoration of the
hierarchy — Opinions as to its advisability — Address to Pius
IX. — Reply of the Pope — Preliminary negotiations — Reasons
adduced against the measure — Considerations in its favour —
Titles of the restored sees— Question as to the metropolitan-
Various methods of episcopal election — Proposed erection of
chapters and parishes — Means of support of the episcopate —
Final result of the negotiations, . . • 265
XIV CONTENTS.
CHAPTEE VI.
THE BULL OF POPE LEO XIII., EX SUPREMO APOSTOLATUS APICK,
MARCH 4, 1878.
Provisions of the Papal bull— Public opinion on the subject — The
newspaper press and the hierarchy — Passive attitude of Scot
tish Protestants — Opinion of leading counsel — Protest of the
Scotch Episcopalian prelates — Confusion of ideas characteris
ing it — Phases of Presbyterianism — The question of church
patronage — Patronage under James VI. — Its abolition in 1649
— Restored under Queen Anne — Rise of the Moderates — The
Disruption (1843) — The Veto Act — Influence wielded by the
Free Church — Divisions among the Presbyterians — The Estab
lishment and the State — Fluctuations of Scottish Protestantism
— Subdivision of religious sects — Modification of the Calvin-
istic doctrines — Spread of rationalism in Scotland — Trial of
ministers for heresy — Proposed revision of the formularies —
Mr Macrae and the Westminster Confession — Denial of eternal
punishment — Decay of religion among the people — Position
and prospects of the Catholic Church in Scotland — Material
condition of the Church — Foundation of the Abbey of Fort-
Augustus — The bull Romanes Pontifices — Scotland and the
Holy See — Position of the Catholic clergy at the present
day — Conclusion, ....... 309
APPENDIX.
I. Letter from Pope Urban VIII. to Richard Smith, Bishop
of Chalcedon, Vicar- Apostolic of England and Scotland,
1626, 343
II. Report of the Superior of the Scottish Mission to the
Congregation of Propaganda, 1650-1660, . . 344
III. Discussion as to canonical penalties incurred by Catherine
of Braganza, in consequence of her marriage to Charles
II. without a Papal dispensation, . . . 352
IV. A brief account of particulars occurring at the happy
death of our late sovereign Lord King Charles the 2nd
in regard to religion ; faithfully related by his then as
sistant, Mr Jo. Hudleston, .... 353
CONTENTS. XV
V. Report and suggestions submitted to Propaganda by Alex
ander Leslie, visitor of the Scottish Mission, 1681, . 356
VI. Report of Thomas Nicolson, first Vicar- Apostolic of Scot
land, to Propaganda, September 21, 1697, . . 364
VII. Report of Mr John Irvin, procurator of the Scottish mis
sion in Paris, to the nuncio in that city, on the state of
the Church in Scotland, September 5, 1698, . . 367
VIII. Extract from a Visitation Report of Thomas Nicolson,
Vicar-Apostolic of Scotland, to the Congregation of
Propaganda, 1700, . . . . .371
IX. Extract from a letter addressed by Abbot Bernard Stuart
of St James's, Ratisbon, to the Cardinal-Prefect of
Propaganda, April 26, 1752, .... 374
X. Report of Bishop Gordon, Vicar-Apostolic, and his Co
adjutor, Bishop Wallace, to Propaganda, October 15,
1723, 377
XI. Extract from a letter of Bishops Gordon and Wallace (Co
adjutor) to Propaganda, August 13, 1726, . . 381
XII. Report of Bishops Gordon and Wallace to Propaganda,
July 4, 1730, 383
XIII. Report of Bishop Hugh Macdonald, Vicar- Apostolic of the
Highlands, to Propaganda, March 18, 1732, . . 388
XIV. Report of Bishops Macdonald and Smith (Vicars-Apos
tolic), and Grant (coadjutor) to Propaganda, November
20, 1755, . . . . . .392
XV. Report of Bishops Gordon (Vicar-Apostolic) and Smith
(coadjutor) to Propaganda, February 5, 1743, . . 395
XVI. Report of Bishop Smith (Vicar- Apostolic) to Propaganda,
December 13, 1747, ..... 399
XVII. Report of Bishops Macdonald and Smith (Vicars-Apos
tolic) to Propaganda, November 1, 1753, . . 405
XVIII. Extract from the Report of Mgr. Lercari, pro-Nuncio at
Paris, to the Cardinal-Prefect of Propaganda, as to the
Scotch College in Paris, 1737, .... 408
XIX. Extract from the Apostolic Letter of Pope Leo XIII., Ex
Supremo Apostolatus Apice, restoring the hierarchy in
Scotland, March 4, 1878, .... 414
XX. Bishops in Scotland from 1695 to 1890, . . . 422
XXI. List of the Religious Houses in Scotland before the
Reformation, ...... 424
XXII. Statistics of the Catholic Church in Scotland, 1890, . 426
INDEX, ...... 427
HISTOBY
CATHOLIC CHUECH OF SCOTLAND,
CHAPTER I.
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND UNDER
CHARLES I. AND THE COMMONWEALTH
(1625-1660).
KING JAMES expired on the 27th of March 1625, Accession
and on the 31st of the same month his son Charles i., March
was proclaimed King of Scotland at the Market-
Cross of Edinburgh. During his reign the war
between the opposing Protestant parties in Scot
land continued to rage with unabated fierceness ;
and the part which the monarch took in the con
test undoubtedly contributed to hasten his down
fall.
No sooner was he established on the throne, church
than Charles proceeded to manifest his strong pre- ISeSew
dilection for Episcopalianism, by endeavouring to
VOL. IV. A
2 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
recover possession of the church -lands, in order to
endow the Scotch Episcopal Church. Failing in
this, he issued a commission in 1627 to receive
the impropriated tithes and benefices, in order to
provide incomes for the clergy. Such measures,
although in full accordance with the statutes
o
which had established the Episcopalian system in
Scotland, were productive of general discontent ;
and this was increased by the liturgical innova
tions which the king and his primate (Laud) were
introducing into the Anglican worship, and the
tendency to Arminianism — striking at the great
Calvinistic doctrine of predestination to damna
tion — observed in the Anglican Church. In the
visit of year 1633 Charles paid a visit to the country of
Scotland, his birthplace ; but although he was received with
respect by his Scottish subjects, they were re
pelled rather than attracted by the melancholy
sternness of his character, so different from the
homely good-humour of their late sovereign. The
unjust trial of Lord Balmerino in the following
year, on a charge of treason, merely for being in
possession of a petition against the royal measures,
still further alienated Charles from the people of
Scotland. Nor was his unpopularity decreased
by their knowledge of his quarrels with the Eng
lish Parliament, and with Elliot, Pym, and other
leaders of the patriotic party, or by the news
which reached Scotland of the despotism of Straf-
ford in Ireland, and the Puritans pilloried and
RIOT IX ST GILES CHURCH. 3
banished in large numbers to Holland and
America.
Under these circumstances, a collision between Collision
between
the royal authority on the one hand and Presby- Jjjj
terian fanaticism on the other was clearly inevit- v™.^1-
J tenans.
able. The immediate cause of the final rupture
was the determination of the king to introduce a introduc
tion of the
liturgy into the public worship. It must be re- gS0e£v,!ce~
membered that Charles regarded this question in
a different aspect from that of his father, whose
principal motive in the establishment of Epis-
copalianism had been the belief that it would
strengthen the power of the Crown. To Charles,
on the other hand, the Episcopal system was an
essential part of his religious faith ; and it is to
this conviction that we must ascribe the perti
nacity with which he urged the acceptance of his
liturgical views, and his utter regardlessness of
the opposition which they excited. The storm
broke in Edinburgh on July 23, 1637, on the
occasion of the first introduction of the obnoxious
service-book into the Kirk. The Presbyterian
leaders had already prepared for the battle, and
had, by the most violent invectives against Prel
acy, inflamed the feelings of their followers to the
utmost pitch of excitement.
On the Sunday appointed for the inauguration Riot in st
of the new liturgy, the church of St Giles was church,
&J ' . July 23,
filled to overflowing. Ranged on the side of the 1637.
Episcopalians appeared the Archbishops of St
4 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
Andrews and Glasgow, the Bishop of Edinburgh,
and other prelates, the lords of the Privy Coun
cil, the judges of the Court of Session, and the
magistrates of Edinburgh. The Presbyterians
were represented by a few ministers, and by a
large muster of female enthusiasts, fully prepared
to do battle for the cause. Dean Hannay, vested
in a surplice, mounted the pulpit and began to
read the prescribed prayers; but his voice was
instantly drowned in a tumult of shouting, hiss
ing, hand -clapping, and other discordant noises.
Such epithets as "thief, devil's get, crafty fox,
antichristian wolf," were hurled at the Episco
palian clergy ; and the climax of the disturbance
was reached by a woman named Jenny Geddes
seizing a stool and flinging it at the head of the
unfortunate dean, the missile being followed by a
shower of Bibles, Testaments, and psalm-books.1
The mob then rushed outside, brpke the windows
of the church with stones, and continued to assail
their opponents with every possible insult and
abuse. The bishop was seized by a party of in
furiated women, thrown down, and rolled in the
mire. The fact that no punishment of any kind
appears to have been inflicted on the perpetrators
1 A brass plate was erected in St Giles' in 1883, bearing the fol
lowing inscription : " To James Hannay, D.D., Dean of the Cathe
dral, 1634-39. He was the First and the Last who read the Service-
Book in this Church. This memorial is erected in happier times by
his Descendant."
THE NATIONAL COVENANT. 5
of these outrages, shows on which side was the
general feeling throughout the country.1
The culpable weakness displayed by the autho- S
., tionofthe
rities with reference to these extraordinary ex- National
Covenant.
cesses could not but result in the material
strengthening of the Presbyterian influence. A
new covenant was now drawn up, and was
ordered to be read in every kirk in the king
dom : it was known as the National Covenant,
and was framed by four committees (called the
Tables, and representing the nobles, gentry, min
isters, and burgesses respectively) which met in
Edinburgh towards the close of the year 1637.
Under the pressure of threats of excommunica
tion in this world and eternal damnation in the
next, the people were called upon to subscribe
this document, which declared open war upon
" Popery, Prelacy, and all their supporters and
adherents." The populace were excited by the
violence of the preachers to a condition of reli
gious fanaticism little short of madness ; and
Catholics and Episcopalians were alike denounced
as criminals outside the protection of the law.
The Protestant prelates, who had succeeded to
1 Gordon of Rothiemay, Hist, of Scots Affairs, 1637-1641 (Spal-
ding), vol. i. p. 57. Brief and true Relation of the Broil, &c. (Ap
pendix to Rothes' Relation of Proceedings), p. 201. Wodrow, in
his Analecta, throws a doubt on the identity of the heroine who
" cast the first stool at the bishop," and assigns that honour to one
Mrs Mean. "Many of the lasses," he adds, "were prentices in
disguise, for they threw stools to a great length."— TRANSLATOR.
6 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
the dignities and property of the Catholic epis
copate, were now in their turn proclaimed to be
guilty of " drunkenness, impurity, gaming, pro
fanation of the Sabbath, bribery, simony, dis
honesty, perjury, oppression, adultery, and incest."
Such was the result of the king's obstinate deter
mination to impose his ecclesiastical views on his
Scottish subjects. " Nine teen- twentieths of the
people," observes Chambers,1 " were in their
hearts opposed to his measures ; and now he
had given them occasion to declare themselves,
and enter at all hazards upon a course of re
sistance."
Attempted Alarmed at length by the violent feeling
conipro- ,.,..,.
mise by which his ill - judged measures had excited in
the king.
Scotland, Charles in the autumn of 1638 sought
to calm it by offering to withdraw the unpopular
service-book, and suspend the jurisdiction of the
episcopal courts as well as the observance of the
Perth articles. But matters had now gone too
far for compromise ; and however disposed the
majority of the nation might have been to accept
the concessions offered, the General Assembly
would hear of no half measures.
They met at Glasgow in November, and in
spite of the protest of the bishops, and the act
of the royal commissioner declaring the Assembly
dissolved, they continued to sit, and passed a
1 Donustic Annals of Scotland, vol. ii. p. 3.
THE SCOTCH AND THE CIVIL WAR. 7
resolution abolishing not only the obnoxious
liturgy and canons, but episcopacy itself. This
5J ' / blyabol-
was confirmed at the next meeting; of the As- ishes epis
copacy,
sembly in the following year ; and meanwhile
the Covenanters, not content with defending
their own borders, mustered a powerful army, andap-
r . J peals to
crossed the Tweed, and advanced into England, arms.
The resistance of the English Parliament to the
royal measures, and the arraignment on a charge
of treason of the king's two chief advisers, Laud
and Strafford, served to confirm the Scotch in
the attitude they had taken up ; nor did his
conciliatory visit to Edinburgh in August 1641
succeed in reconciling them to his ecclesiastical
policy. Shortly after his return to London the
popular party in Parliament presented him with
the famous Remonstrance, which finally resulted
in the raising of the royal standard at Notting
ham, and the subjection of the country to the
horrors of civil war.
The sympathies of the Scotch were naturally
enlisted in the cause of the Parliamentary party,
which accordingly, in August 1643, entered into
what was called a Solemn League and Covenant The Solemn
League and
with them, one of the conditions being the levy- Covenant.
ing of a new Scotch army, which entered England
in the following winter, and materially assisted
in gaining the victory of Marston Moor. The
chivalrous efforts of Montrose in Scotland did not
8 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
Charles
surren
dered by
the Pres
byterians
to his ene
mies.
Trial and
execution
of King
Charles,
January
1649.
Scottish
Catholics
under
Charles I.
and Crom
well.
succeed in counteracting the blow thus inflicted
on the royal cause, which was rendered desperate
by his subsequent defeats at Naseby and Newbury.
Charles was rash enough to place himself in the
hands of the Presbyterians ; and the latter, fear
ing lest the possession of the royal person might
bring them into collision with their powerful
neighbours, surrendered him to the English Par
liament. Charles persistently refused to concede
the demands of his enemies. A force of his ad
herents in Scotland, under the Duke of Hamilton,
crossed the Border in July 1648, but were routed
by the Parliamentary troops, led by Oliver Crom
well himself. Cromwell proceeded as far as
Edinburgh, where the Presbyterians were now
in power, and then returned in triumph to Lon
don. The sequel need not be dwelt on here. In
January 1649, Charles was tried and sentenced
for the alleged crime of making war on his sub
jects, and on the 30th of the month was beheaded
at Whitehall. It is impossible not to see in his
tragical fate the direct consequence of the mis
guided zeal with which he had endeavoured to
thrust his ecclesiastical views upon his Scottish
subjects.
The condition of the Catholics of Scotland
under Charles I. and Cromwell can only be de
scribed as truly pitiable. A contemporary wit
ness declared, in a report sent to Urban VIII. ,
that the lot of the Catholics in the reign of
PENAL LAWS UNDER CHARLES I.
Elizabeth had been a happy one in comparison.1
Charles, on the one hand, sanctioned the relent
less execution of the penal statutes, with the idea
of thus disarming the opposition of the Kirk to
his liturgical innovations ; while Cromwell, on the
other, seems to have continued the policy of per
secution out of sheer hatred to the Catholic
religion. No sooner had Charles ascended the
throne, than the rumour began to be spread
that he meditated some radical change in the
constitution of the Kirk. A proclamation, was
immediately issued denouncing this report as
mischievous and groundless, and declaring the
king's entire satisfaction with the ecclesiastical
arrangements in Scotland. By way of removing
any doubt as to the soundness of his principles,
the Privy Council ordered lists to be drawn up
of the Catholics throughout the country ; 2 and a
second proclamation was shortly afterwards issued,
commanding all the king's subjects, "of whatso- Euforce-
n - meiit of
ever rank or degree, to conform themselves to the the penal
laws.
1 Cod. Casaiiat., X. v. 36. " Brevis eorum descriptio, quse in Anglia
adversus Catholicos gesta simt a ruptis cum Hispano conjugii foederi-
bus, et cum Gallo iniri cceptis per Marcum Anton ium cum in Urbem
rediisset Tuae Sanctitati fideliter reprsesentata. Optabiliora longe
tempora Elizabeths, cum subinde Catholicorum vena secarentur.
. . . Qute refero non tarn auribus, quani oculis hausi."
2 One of these lists is published in the Spalding Miscellany, vol.
ii., Preface, p. liv-lvi. The following note is affixed : " These ar
the names of the most scandalous and irregular onlie of the ad-
versars of the treuth, surceasing to sett doun the great number of
otheris (and speciallie of the female sex) that hes maid the lyk de-
fectioun from the treuth."
10 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
public profession of the true religion, prohibiting
the exercise of any contrary profession, under the
pains contained in the laws made thereanent."
The harbouring of Catholic priests was forbidden
under the severest penalties ; and all parents who
were having their children educated abroad were
strictly charged to have them brought home before
a certain day.1 Nor did King Cha'rles confine
his anti-Catholic measures to Scotland. In the
summer of 1627, whilst the General Assembly in
Edinburgh was engaged in deploring the " increase
of Papistry and sin," Charles in London was sig
nalising his Protestant zeal by banishing, contrary
to his express and solemn engagement to Hen
rietta Maria and her royal brother,2 the French
clergy who had come to England in attendance
on his queen.
The year 1628 was marked by a still more
stringent application of the penal laws against
the unfortunate Catholics of Scotland. For some
time past they had ventured to show themselves
with a little more boldness than formerly ; and
it was even, said that certain pasquinades written
against the Protestant bishop of Aberdeen, and
posted on the door of his own cathedral, were
attributable to some among their number. The
Privy Council were well aware that the king's
1 Privy Council Records (Chambers, Domestic Annals of Scotland,
vol. ii. p. 5).
2 See ante, vol. iii. pp. 431, 493.
CATHOLICS BEFORE THE PRIVY COUNCIL. 11
ecclesiastical innovations had already rendered
him highly unpopular in Scotland, and they did
not wish the feeling increased by any appearance
of royal sympathy with Popery. Orders were citation'of
accordingly issued for the appearance before them before the
of a number of Catholics, both priests and laymen, council.
in the northern provinces — the Marquis of Huntly
being especially blamed for the protection which
he afforded to these disaffected persons. Among
those cited to appear were Robert Bisset of Les-
sendrum ; Alexander Gordon of Drumquhaill ;
Gordon of Tilliesoul ; Adam Smith, chamberlain
of the Enzie, and his wife Barbara ; Malcolm
Laing ; and Adam Strachan, chamberlain to the
Earl of Aboyne. They are charged with indif
ference under the " fearful sentence of excom- '
munication," and are said to be encouraged in
their rebellion by the marquis. The recital which
follows includes the names of Alexander Irving,
burgess of Aberdeen ; Thomas Menzies of Bal-
gounie ; John Spence, notary at Pewsmill ;
Alexander Leslie, brother to the Laird of Pit-
caple ; Francis Leslie, brother to Capuchin Leslie ;
William Seton of Blair ; Thomas Laing, goldsmith,
burgess of Aberdeen. These persons and others
are declared to have " proudly and contemptu-
andly remained under excommunication this long
time bygane," and charged with " hunting and
seeking all occasion where they may have the ex
ercise of their false religion ; for which purpose
12 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
they are avowed resetters of Jesuits, seminary
and mass priests, accompanying them through
the country, armed with unlawful weapons." A
command follows to Huntly, as Sheriff-Principal
of Aberdeen, and to Lord Lovat, Sheriff of Elgin
and Forres, to search for these evil-doers, and
deliver them to justice.1
Huntiy The Privy Council appear to have been suffi-
andthe . J . rr
catholics ciently conscious of the false position in which they
placed themselves, by ordering Huntly, himself of
course well known as a leading Catholic, to make
inquisition for his co-religionists. We find them
accordingly, on December 6, 1628, addressing a
letter to the king, in which they state their
belief that the late increase of Popery and grow
ing insolence of the Papists arises from the fact
of the execution of the penal laws being in the
hands of notorious professors of the same faith,
whose position and influence were such as to
overawe inferior officials, however zealous. The
king is consequently prayed to exclude from his
Council all persons suspected of Popery : mean
while, orders have been given to the sheriffs to
" apprehend the delinquents if they can or dare."
When the day came for the appearance of the
accused, Huntly declared, through his deputy,
that the wintry weather had prevented him from
1 Chambers, Domestic Annals, vol. ii. p. 22. For a list of the
Catholic clergy whose apprehension was ordered at the same time,
see post, p. 37.
PROCLAMATION AGAINST CATHOLICS, 1629. 13
carrying out the commission intrusted to him.
The Council refused to accept the excuse, and
denounced the marquis as a rebel.1
The first proclamation having proved abortive, issue of a
i T-, • .1 second, pro-
tne rnvy Council, on June 18, 1629, issued a ciamation.
second one against the persons already men
tioned and some others, including Sir John
Campbell of Caddell. They are charged with
"continuing obdurate against Kirk and law,
going about as if nothing were amiss, and en
joying possession of their houses, goods, and gear,
which properly belong to his Majesty as escheat."
It is accordingly ordained that officers-at-arms
"pass, pursue, and take the said rebels their
houses, remove them and their families forth
thereof, and keep and detain the same in his
Majesty's name ; " and all neighbours are com
manded to assist in carrying out these orders.
Special zeal is ordered to be shown in appre
hending all who receive or harbour priests in
their houses ; the proclamation adding that the
laws on this point are " eluded by the wives of
persons repute and esteemed to be sound in
religion, who, pretending misknowledge of the
actions of their wives, think to liberate them
selves, as if they were not to answer for their
wives' doings." The husband, in such cases, it
is declared, is always to be responsible for the
wife's act.2
1 Chambers, op. cit., vol. ii. p. 23. 2 Ibid., p. 24.
14 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
Religious In order still further to convince his Scottish
test mi-
G0oveen?n Council °f tne sincerity of his religious zeal,
mentoffi- Charles did not hesitate to go a step further,
and to convert a solemn religious ordinance into
an instrument of inquisition. An order was
issued that all councillors, judges, advocates, and
other Government officials should forthwith par
take of the Communion in the Chapel of Holy-
rood ; and that they should repeat this annually,
on pain of being suspected of leanings to Popery.
Accordingly, in the month of July 1628, the
sacrament was duly administered, " by sound of
trumpet," to a large number of the officials of
the State. Such as abstained from obeying the
summons were made before long to feel the weight
of the royal displeasure. " Understanding," wrote
the king to the Council, on November 6, " that
some popishly affected have neglected this course,
we, out of our care and affection for the mainten
ance of the professed religion, are pleased to will
and require that you remove from our Council-
table all such who are disobedient in that kind." l
Severe ad- Recourse was had to the Privy Council in
ministra- ^
tS1ia°fthe orc^er t° obtain, if possible, some measure of
statutes, relief for the imprisoned Catholics ; but a deaf
ear was turned to all such petitions. " None,"
it was ordained, " shall be relieved out of ward,
but upon obedience and conformity to the true
religion, or else upon their voluntary offer of
1 Chambers, op. cit., vol. ii. p. 25.
THE MARCHIONESS OF ABERCORX. 15
banishment forth of his Majesty's whole domin
ions." The severity with which the penal laws
were enforced at this time by Kirk and Council is
testified by the treatment of a prominent Catholic Harsh
treatment
lady, the Marchioness of Abercorn. The warmth of Lady
•' Abercorn.
and zeal which she had displayed in the cause of
her co-religionists had resulted in her apprehen
sion and close confinement in the Tolbooth at
Edinburgh. Here her health, already much im
paired, had suffered greatly from the damp and
unwholesome cell assigned to her, so that we are
told that she now " found a daily decay and
weakness in her person." It was represented to
the king that a change of air and scene was im
peratively necessary to save the prisoner's life.
Reluctant to do anything against the authority
of the Kirk, and at the same time unwilling that
the marchioness should be brought to the last
extremity, Charles gave her permission to repair
to the baths of Bristol, but only on condition that
she made no attempt to appear at Court, and un
dertook to return to Edinburgh on her recovery.
Lady Abercorn, however, did not avail herself of
the royal indulgence; and it does not appear to
have been until she had suffered full three years'
imprisonment, that she was at length licensed
to return to her home at Paisley — and even then
only with the stipulation that she should not
receive at her house " Thomas Algeo nor no
Jesuits," and should moreover appear at Edin-
16 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
burgh when called upon, under a penalty of five
thousand marks.1
Such of the Catholics as quitted Scotland,
tion of pro
perty of preferring a life of exile to the betraval of their
Catholics. r ^
religion and conscience, naturally found them
selves greatly embarrassed as to their future
means of subsistence. They accordingly peti
tioned to have some portion at least of their
confiscated property restored to them ; and the
king, we are told, " out of his gracious bounty
and clemency, in hope of their timely reclaiming,"
was pleased to order that the forfeited estates
should be divided into three portions, of which
two were to belong to the Crown, and the re
maining third to the original owners.
Measures One of the principal means by which it was
taken to . .
ensure hoped to secure the extirpation of the old religion,
ofcwidren was ^e ordinance which provided for the educa
tion of the children of prominent Catholics under
Protestant tutors. Even the powerful Huntly,
when he appeared before the Council in December
1628, to excuse himself for failing to "exhibit"
the Papists on his estates, was informed that his
excuse could not be accepted ; and he was further
ordered to appear again on a certain date, to
witness the " sequestration " of his daughters,
" for their better breeding and instruction in the
grounds of the true religion." The Earl of Angus
had likewise received injunctions to commit his
1 Chambers, op. cit., vol. ii. pp. 25, 26.
THE CATHOLICS OF THE NORTH. 17
eldest son, James Douglas, to the care of Prin
cipal Adamson of the Edinburgh University, for
the settling of his religious doubts. The youth,
however, contrived to give his tutor the slip,
whereupon he was intrusted to the guardianship
of the Duke of Lennox. Angus was in con
sequence summoned before the Council ; and
although he submitted that he had had no
knowledge of his son's action until after the
event, he was compelled to sue for pardon. The
two daughters of the Earl of Errol, as well as
the children of the Laird of Dalgety, and of
Gordon of Dunkinty, were said to be under
" vehement suspicion of being corrupted in their
religion by remaining in their fathers' company ; "
as were also the daughters of Huntly, Lord Gray,
and many others. The Earl of Nithsdale was
commanded by the Council to produce his son,
that he might be examined as to his religious
sentiments. Lord Gordon also, the same who
afterwards received a commission from the Gov
ernment against the northern Papists, was ordered
to place his sons under a tutor approved of by the
Archbishop of St Andrews.1
The fresh campaign against the Catholics of crusade
the north, to which allusion has just been made, catholics
in the
opened in January 1630. King Charles, who
reckoned on the Scotch Catholic nobles as among
the most loyal supporters of his throne and gov-
1 Chambers, op. cit., vol. ii. p. 27.
VOL. IV. B
18 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
ernment, was, there is no reason to doubt, per
sonally averse to the persecuting measures which
were forced upon him by the fanatical adherents
of the Kirk. It was probably, therefore, from a
motive of leniency that he intrusted the execution
of the penal laws to Lord Gordon, Huntly's eldest
son, who, although he had through the influence
of King James received a Protestant education,
was yet unlikely to err on the side of too great
severity in carrying out the royal commission.
He was, indeed, at first unwilling to accept it ;
and when he at length agreed to do so, he per
formed his duty, as Sir liobert Gordon tells us,
with a " dexterity and moderation " that won for
him general approval. That he counted on gain
ing some pecuniary advantages from his crusade
against the Catholics, is clear from the tenor of a
petition which he presented to the Privy Council
respecting the escheat of the rebels' property.
The effect of restoring to them .a third part of
their estate would be, he submitted, simply to
confirm them in obstinacy, while it would result
in a direct loss to himself. In reply to this
appeal, the Council appears to have ordained
that no deduction should be made from the re
muneration which he expected for his services.
LordGor- On June 1, 1630, Lord Gordon came before the
port to the Privy Council to report the progress he had made
council. in executing his commission. A number of per
sons, it appeared, including Robert Bisset, the
CATHOLICS BEFORE THE PRIVY COUNCIL. 19
Gordons of Tilliesoul and Drumquhaill, Hugh
Hill, John Spence and his spouse, had " given
obedience and reconciled themselves to the
Kirk ; " while others, among whom were Bisset's
wife, the Gordons of Cairnbarrow, Corrichie, and
Letterfour, Malcolm Laing, Adam Strachan, and
Forbes of Blackton and his wife, were reported
to stand out " in obstinate disobedience." Most
of the latter appeared before the Council on
July 20, when they were given their choice
of conforming before a certain day, or of leaving
the country. Dr William Leslie and Sir John
Ogilvie of Craig were similarly bound about the
same time. The former, however, was licensed
three months later to return to Scotland, in
order to attend professionally upon the Marquis
of Huntly, who appeared to have confidence in
no other practitioner. John Gordon of Bouiitie,
who had allowed a priest named Robert Mortimer
to say mass in his house, received in consequence
a visit of remonstrance from two members of the
presbytery. John seems to have broken out on
the occasion into somewhat violent language, of
which, however, he very soon repented ; for we
find him a little later supplicating the Protestant
bishop of Aberdeen for release from excommuni
cation, and reconciliation with the Established
Church.
A petition presented to the Privy Council on
July 27, 1630, by John Gordon of Craig, is inter- Craig.
20 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
esting, alike from the touching simplicity of its
wording, and as an instance of the real sufferings
to which the unfortunate Catholic gentry of Scot
land were at this time exposed. It sets forth
" that, for religion, order hath been given for
banishing the petitioner's son, his wife, and
children, and confining himself — in respect of his
great age — in a town within Scotland [Cupar] ;
which order they have all humbly obeyed, his
son, wife, and poor children having forthwith
abandoned the kingdom. A two part of the
poor estate which he hath being allotted for his
son and his family, and a third part for himself,
he now findeth that by such a mean proportion
he cannot be able to live, being both aged and
sickly. His humble suit is, that he may have
leave to depart the kingdom to live with his son,
because by their estate undivided they may all
be more able to subsist than otherwise." l It
might be thought that a petition so natural and
so humbly worded could hardly have met with
itsrecep- other than a favourable reply. The Council,
tionhythe .
Council, however, were pleased to pronounce it unrea
sonable," and further, to declare that " the said
John Gordon of Craig sail have no modification
nor allowance of ane third part of his estate and
living, except he remain within the kingdom and
keep the bounds of his confinement." Nor did
1 From the original in the Eegister House (Chambers, vol. ii.
p. 38).
PERSECUTION OF CATHOLIC LADIES. 21
they stop here ; for it being found that Craig-
was in the habit of receiving visits from persons
" suspect in religion," and not only conferring
with them, but (as was supposed) " entertaining
practices hurtful to the true religion," he was
compelled to quit his home, and to fix his resi
dence in the remote burgh of Grail.1
To such an extent was the persecution of the interven
tion of the
Scottish Catholics carried at this time, that the French am
bassador;
French ambassador in London thought fit to in London,
write to Home on the subject. The Congrega
tion of Propaganda, on October 1, 1630, begged
him to use his influence with the king on behalf
of the sufferers ; and the nuncio in Paris was at
the same time directed to confer in regard to
the matter with Carlo Colonna, the Spanish
ambassador.2
It must not be supposed that the pressure of Pressure of
^ .the penal
the penal laws was not felt by the Catholic ladies laws on the
J Catholic
of Scotland at this time, equally with the rest of Jf^f of
J Scotland.
their co-religionists. We find specially cited by
the Privy Council, in December 1630, Madelen
Wood, spouse to Leslie of Kincraigie, Janet
Wood, Marjory Malcolm, Isobel Strachan, and
several others, " who are not only professed and
avowed Papists, and excommunicat by orders of
the Kirk for that cause, but with that they are
1 Chambers, vol. ii. p. 39.
2 Archiv. Propag., Acta, 1 Octob. 1630 (fol. 139). "Ut modis,
quibus poterit, afflictam Scotice ecclesiam Catholicam juvare velit."
22 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
denounced his Majesty's rebels." It is further
declared that these ladies are " common resetters,
hoorders, and enterteiners of Jesuits, and mess-
priests, and traffiquing Papists — hears mess of
them, and otherwise lives aftir ane most scan
dalous and offensive manner ; " and they are
ordered to appear personally with their hus
bands, to answer the charges against them.
Among the many sufferers for conscience' sake
Sufferings at this time, we may cite the case of Elisabeth
ofElisa- . J
bethGari- Garioch, who, on September 9, 1630, presented
ochforthe / ' f
faith. a petition to the Privy Council, setting forth
the hardships to which she was exposed for her
" averseness and non-conformity to the religion
presently professed." The petitioner, who was a
woman of over seventy, and wholly bed-ridden,
had lain for months in the Tolbooth of Aberdeen,
her only means of subsistence being a little croft,
which, however, she had neither husband nor son
to cultivate for her. She therefore craved release
from prison, undertaking — " for the eschewing of
scandal, which her remaining in the country might
occasion "- —to give security for her quitting the
kingdom forthwith. The Lords of the Council
were pleased to direct the Bishop of Aberdeen to
see to the liberation of the poor woman, but only
on condition of her finding caution to the amount
of a thousand marks for her banishment from
Scotland.1
1 Chambers, op. cit., vol. ii. pp. 38, 39.
INSTANCES OF ROYAL CLEMENCY. 23
It would be easy to cite many similar instances
from the records of the time, although few indeed
of our national historians have thought them
worthy of record. "It is remarkable," observes
the impartial writer to whom we have made fre
quent reference, " that while the histories of our
country and its national Church are careful to
note every particular of the conflict between
Presbytery and Episcopacy at this period, there
is nowhere the slightest allusion to these suffer
ings of the remnant of Romanists, towards which
Presbyterians and Episcopalians alike contrib
uted." l Nor did the chief evil consist, as the
same author has well observed, in the actual
severities endured by the Catholics who con
tinued staunch to their faith, but rather in the
hypocrisy which was involved in the external
conformity to Protestantism of large numbers of
persons who remained Catholic at heart.
Notwithstanding the general severity with occasional
exercise
which the persecuting laws against Catholics °[
continued to be administered during this period,
there were not wanting individual cases, espe
cially when persons of rank were concerned, in
which the royal indulgence was exercised with a
view to removing, or at least mitigating, the
penalties incurred. Thus we find Sir John
Ogilvie of Craig, after a considerable term of Crais-
imprisonment in Edinburgh Castle, permitted to
1 Ibid., p. 40.
24 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
return home, " upon promise of ane sober and
modest behaviour without scandal or offence to
the Kirk." Complaint was made, however, very
shortly afterwards, that since his going home he
had " behaved himself very scandalously, daily
conversing with excommunicat persons, privately
resetting seminary and mass priests, and restrain
ing his bairns and servants from coming to
the kirk, to the heigh offence of God and dis
grace of his Majesty's government," Sir John
was accordingly recommitted to ward at St
Andrews, whence he obtained his release only
on certain stringent conditions ; among others,
that he should cause his family and household
to attend the kirk regularly, that he himself
should remain in his house and within two miles
thereof, should not receive priests, nor be found
reasoning against the established religion.1
In November 1631, the Council had before
them the case of the Earl of Nithsdale, who was
said to be " vehemently suspected in his religion;"
and it was farther declared that " the remaining
of Lord Maxwell, his son, in his company, might
prove very dangerous to the youth, and now in
his tender years infect and poison him with
opinions from which it would be difficult there
after to reclaim him." The earl was accordingly
,. o J
directed to produce his son, that measures might
be taken "for his breeding and education in
1 This was in September 1631. See Chambers, op. cit., vol. ii
p. 58.
BITTER FEELING IX SCOTLAND. 25
the true religion." These summary proceed
ings are the more remarkable, taken in connec
tion with the high position of Nithsdale, who had
only lately been in command of a large force in
the service of the king's brother-in-law in Ger
many.1 In other cases which came before the
Council at this time, we find the king occasionally
interfering to mitigate the crushing penalties in
curred by the unfortunate Catholic gentlemen.
Thus Patrick Con of Achry, and Gordon of Craig,
both obtained, by means of petitions to his Ma
jesty, some relaxation of the excommunication
incurred by them for adherence to the Catholic
religion.
These and similar acts of clemency, which Protests
against
Charles occasionally saw fit to exercise in regard the royal
* indulgence.
to his Catholic subjects, were, as might be ex
pected, far from palatable to the Kirk and Council
of Scotland. A strong protest on the subject was
made by a diocesan synod which assembled at
Aberdeen in July 1632. It was represented to
the Council that the permission to return home
granted to recusant Catholics could only result
in confirming them in obstinacy, and nullifying
the effect of the excommunication of the Church.
In consequence, perhaps, of the urgent demands
made on them for increased strictness in enforcing
the penal laws, the Council proceeded to summon
before them Dr William Leslie and Robert Irving,
who were among those who had returned from
1 Ibid., p. 59.
26 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
abroad, and to require them to exhibit their
licences. A few months later, orders were issued
for the apprehension of one Andrew Anderson,
who was said to occupy himself, in and about
Dumfries, in arranging for the sending of gentle
men's sons beyond seas to be educated. Anderson
was brought to Edinburgh, and confined in the
Tolbooth ; but before his case could be dealt with
he died in prison.1
Appeal to The reports which constantly reached Rome
Queen
Henrietta relative to the sufferings of the Scottish Catho-
Mana.
lies, induced the Congregation of Propaganda to
appeal to Queen Henrietta Maria to use her influ
ence in obtaining a cessation of the persecution.2
Letter to On February 12, 1633, Urban VIII. addressed
the queen
urbaif°pe a letter to the queen, earnestly exhorting her to
VIIL intervene on behalf of the distressed Catholics,
whose daily sufferings, he adds, are too grievous
to be borne with longer by her clemency and
loving-kindness.3 In a session of the Congrega-
1 Chambers, op. cit., vol. ii. p. 60. Anderson is described, in the
usual official style, as a " busy trafficking papist."
2 Archiv. Propag., Sessio 16 Novemb. 1632 (fol. 139). " Breve ad
Eeginam Anglise, ut officia sua apud Regem suum maritum imponat
pro Catholicis Scotiae, ne ab htereticis tarn dire et crudeliter oppri-
mantur, et ad Nuntium Galliarum, ut a Eege christianissimo aliquam
provisionem procuret."
3 Bullar. S. Congr. de Prop. Fide (Append, ad t. i. p. 195).
" Quamobrem Catholicos, quos ab hsereticis in Scotia indigne vexari
cognovimus, Majestati Tuoe sic commendamus, ut neque majori
studio quidquam, neque justioribus de causis commendare possimus.
Quse ab iis quotidie patiuntur, acerbiora sunt quam ut a dementia
et pietate tua diutius tolerari debeant, neque non de rei familiaris
ZEAL OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CLERGY. 27
tion held in September 16, Cardinal Bentivoglio
was able to report that the queen had complied
with the wishes of the Holy See, and that good
hopes were entertained of the speedy relief of the
Catholics of Scotland.1 Henrietta Maria appears
to have exerted herself in their favour on more
than one occasion. We find her, for example,
recommending to the good offices of Cardinal
Barberini a young Scotchman of good family
named Colin Campbell, who had been treated
with great harshness by his family on account of
his recent conversion to the Catholic religion.2
A prominent part was of course taken by the Activity of
Presbyterian ministers in the frequent prosecu- i>yterian
tion of Catholics before the Privy Council. The
Records of June 1634 give the decision of the
Council in the case of Robert Rig of Dumfries, Prosecu-
who was charged, at the instance of the Pres- catholics
. . .at Bum-
bytery, with having been married " by a Popish fries.
jactura, aut de corporis incommodis, qxire tamen durissima sunt, sed
de animae interitu prsecipue agitur, quo omnia ab illis per summam
impietatem diriguntur."
1 Archiv. Propag., 17 Sept. 1633 (fol. 298). " Em'»«s D. Cardin-
alis Bentivoglio retulit de mandatis ab eaderu Regina [Angliae]
opportvine datis pro prsedictorum Catholicorum subsidio et de ape
concepta, quod per praedicta mandata iidem Catholici sint valde
sublevandi a persecutionibus quas nunc patiuntur."
2 Copy of a letter in the Barberini Collection (Record Office) :
" De Londres,' ce 28 Novembre 1639. Henriette M. R. a Mon
Cousin le Cardinal Barbevini. Le jeune gentilhomme Colin Camp-
belle, n(j de fort bon lieu, et descendu d'une des plus nobles et
anciennes families d'escosse, a este* traitte* assez rudement de ses
parents, parcequ'il s'est depuis quelque terns converty de son erreur
a nre sainte foy."
28 CATHOLIC CHTJKCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
priest, on a Sunday, at night, with candle-light,
above the bridge of Cluden in the fields, in pres
ence of four witnesses, to Elspeth Maxwell, an
excommunicate Papist." Thomas Ramsay, min
ister of Dumfries, appeared before the Council to
support the case against the delinquent ; and the
latter, notwithstanding that he craved for pardon,
was sentenced to be imprisoned during pleasure
in the Tolbooth at Edinburgh, care being mean
time taken that his wife had no access to him
either by word or letter. Elspeth herself had for
some time been in confinement in Dumfries jail —
among her fellow -prisoners being a number of
persons, including fourteen women, wives of re
spectable tradesmen in the town, accused on their
own confession of the crime of hearino- mass
o
several times during the past twelvemonth. On
July 3, Thomas Ramsay, accompanied by Bailie
John Williamson, again appeared before the
Council for the purpose of presenting the above-
mentioned persons. Eight of the delinquents
expressed themselves repentant, and promised
not to " hear mass nor receive Jesuits " for the
future : seven, however, " refused to conform to
the religion presently professed within the king
dom ; in respect whereof, the Lords ordain them
to be committed to ward within the Tolbooth of
Edinburgh, therein to remain upon their own
expenses till they be freed and relieved." A
few days later the prisoners were handed over
DEATH OF LORD HUXTLY, 1636. 29
to the Protestant archbishop of Glasgow, to be
dealt with according to his pleasure.1
Among; those who, whatever religious vacilla- Death of
& the Mar-
tion they had exhibited during- life, had at least fi"i« of
•f Huntly,
the grace to seek reconciliation with the Church ^»'6e 15>
before they died, must be mentioned the Marquis
of Huntly, whose long and eventful career came
to a close in June 1636. Four times, at least, he
had publicly conformed to the established religion,
and had as often reasserted himself a Catholic — a
state of things, as it has been well observed,2 in
which it is hard to say whether Huntly himself was
more to blame for his insincerity, or the Church
courts for accepting professions which they must
have known were valueless. Fortunately for
himself, his religious instincts seem to have
awakened at the last, and he made an edifying
end at Dundee, on June 15, 1636, attended by
the zealous Jesuit missionary, Father William
Christie.3 He was buried in the following-
August, with Catholic rites, in his own aisle in
the noble cathedral of Elgin. The Earl of
Errol, after more than forty years' suffering
1 Privy Council Records (Chambers, Domestic Annals, vol. ii. pp.
72, 73).
2 Chambers, op. cit., vol. ii. p. 91.
3 Father Christie, who came on the Scotch Mission in 1625, is
said in a contemporary letter to have reconciled upwards of four
hundred converts to the Church in less than three years. After
Huntly's death he quitted Scotland, and in 1650 became rector of
the seminary at Douai. (See Oliver's Illustr. of Engl, Ir., and
Scotch Jesuits, p. 17.) — TRANSLATOR.
30 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
for the faith, had predeceased him five years
previously.1
Destmc- From time to time we find the authorities of
"Popish" the Kirk giving fresh evidence of their iconoclastic
images at
Aberdeen, zeal. Thus, on August 5, 1640, orders were given
by the General Assembly for the destruction of
several monuments of the old faith, which still
remained in Aberdeen. In the cathedral of St
Machar, writes a contemporary chronicler, " they
ordained our blessed Lord Jesus Christ his arms
to be cut out of the forefront of the pulpit thereof,
and to take doun the portraiture of the Blessed
Virgin Mary, and our Saviour in her arms, that
had stood since the up-putting thereof. . . . And
besides, where there was any crucifixes set in
glass windows, those he [the Master of Forbes]
caused pull out. . . . He caused a mason strike
out Christ's arms in hewn work, on each end of
Bishop Gavin Dunbar's tomb, and siklike chisel
out the name of Jesus, drawn cipher-ways, out of
the timber wall on the foreside of Machar's aisle.
. . . The crucifix on the Old Town Cross was
thrown down ; the crucifix on the New Toun
Cross closed up, being loth to break the stone ;
the crucifix on the west end of St Nicholas'
1 This excellent nobleman was buried with great simplicity in the
church of Slaines, having desired all that could be saved from his
funeral expenses to be given to the poor. Spalding (Hist, of the.
Trouble* in Scotland, 1624-1645, ed. 1792, vol. i. p. 16) speaks in
the highest terms of his piety and fortitude under long and heavy
trials. — TRANSLATOR.
VANDALISM AT ABERDEEN AND ELGIN. 31
Church in New Aberdeen thrown down, whilk
was never touched before." 1 In December of the
same year, a party of Covenanters, at the in
stance of the parish minister of Elgin, demolished Devasta-
. , , . tion of
the beautiful timber screen which still stood in E1gin
Cathedral.
the ruined cathedral. " On the west side," says
the old writer already quoted, " was painted in
excellent colours, illuminate with stars of bright
gold, the crucifixion of our Lord and Saviour
Jesus Christ ; and this piece was so excellently
done, that the colours and stars never faded nor
evanished, but kept hale and sound as they were
at the beginning. . . . On the other side of the
wall, towards the east, was drawn the Day of Judg
ment. ... It was said this minister caused bring
home to his house the timber thereof, and burn
the same for kitchen and other uses." 2 A similar
act of vandalism was perpetrated in respect to
the venerable cross which stood for centuries in The Ruth-
the parish church of Ruthwell, near Dumfries.
1 Spalding, op. cit., vol. i. p. 246.
2 Spalding, op. cit., vol. i. p. 286. The chronicler adds that the
fire thus sacrilegiously kindled went out every night, " and could
not be holden in to kindle the morning fire, as use is ; whereat the
servants and others marvelled, and thereupon the minister left off
any further to bring in or burn any more of that timber in his
house."
A somewhat better fate was reserved for the picture in Foulis
Church, from which a coating of whitewash having been removed
some years ago, there was revealed a painting of the crucifixion,
measuring over 13 feet in height. Other works painted on wood
were at the same time discovered, including a portrait of the
painter. — TRANSLATOR.
32 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
An interest almost unique attaches to this ancient
monument, with its Latin and Runic inscriptions,
and its sculptured decorations depicting scenes
from Scripture and from Christian antiquity, and
executed with a grace and freedom not unworthy
of a classic age. On July 27, 1642, the General
Assembly decreed its destruction as a monument
of idolatry. It was thrown down accordingly,
and left lying for upwards of a century close to
the former site of the altar of the church.1
zeal of the But it was not only against such of the mate-
Covenant-
ers against ria] monuments of Catholic piety as had escaped
Catholic J
traditions, ^he tempests of the sixteenth century that the
destructive zeal of the Covenanters was now
directed. They aimed at the ruthless suppres
sion of every Christian observance that had sur
vived the Reformation. The Consistorial clerk of
the diocese of Aberdeen, writing in December
Abolition 1641, deplores the change that had thus been
of the
amfSster brougnt about. " Friday the 25 of December,"
festivals. ne writes, " of old called Yool-day ; and whereon
preachings and praises and thanksgiving was
given to God in remembrance of the birth of our
blessed Saviour, and therewith friends and neigh -
1 About the year 1775 the broken cross was thrown out into the
churchyard on the occasion of the reseating of the church ; and some
thirty years later the fragments were pieced together, and removed
to the garden of the old manse. It was only in 1887 that steps were
at length tardily taken to preserve from weather and further decay
this unique relic of Christian antiquity. A detailed account of the
monument will be found in Anderson's Scotland in Early Christian
Times, vol. ii. pp. 232-246.— TRANSLATOR.
ABOLITION OF CHRISTMAS AND EASTER. 33
hours made merry with others and had good
cheer : now this day no such preachings nor such
meetings with merriness, walking up and doun ;
but contrary, this day commanded to be kept as
a work-day, each burgess to keep his booth, each
craftsman his work, feasting and idleset forbidden
out of pulpits. . . . The people was otherwise
inclined, but durst not disobey ; yet little mer
chandise was sold, and as little work done on
this day in either Aberdeen. The colliginers
and other scholars keep the school against their
wills."1 The same Puritan spirit prohibited the
immemorial association of innocent mirth with
the season of Easter. " No flesh durst be sold
in Aberdeen for making good cheer, as wont was
to be. ... A matter never before heard of in
this land, that Pasch-day should be included
within Lentron time, because it was now holden
superstitious ; nor na communion given on Good
Friday nor this Pasch-day, as was usit before.
Marvellous in Aberdeen to see no market, fowl
nor flesh, to be sold on Pasch-even." :
King Charles had, as we have seen, lent the Persecu-
. . tion of the
sanction of his royal authority to the rigorous widowed
J J \ Marchion-
enforcement of the penal laws in Scotland ; and ^s of,
Huntly.
the Covenanting clergy, in the height of their
antagonism to the monarchy, vigorously con
tinued the same intolerant policy. The rank
1 Spalding, History of the Troubles, vol. i. p. 358.
2 Ibid., vol. ii. p. 30.
VOL. IV. C
34 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
and connections of the widowed Marchioness of
Huntly (daughter of Esme, Duke of Lennox),
who had been born and brought up in France,
and was now far advanced in years, did not avail
to protect her from the persecuting zeal of the
Kirk. " A strange thing," wrote Spalding, " to
see a worthy lady, near seventy years of age, put
to such trouble and travail, being a widow, her eld
est son being out of the kingdom, her bairns and
oyes [grandchildren] dispersed and spread — and
albeit nobly born, yet left helpless and comfort
less, and so put at by the Kirk, that she behoved
to go or else to bide excommunication, and there
by lose her estate and living." The marchion
ess, having provided as she best could for the
maintenance of her grandchildren, and having
failed to find any relief in Edinburgh (although
the king himself was resident there at the time),
retired to France, where she died in the follow
ing year.1
^ was not' °^ course> to be expected that the
council. Catnolics belonging to the lower classes of society
could hope to enjoy the toleration which was
denied to persons of rank and position. Among
the petitions to the Privy Council in the spring
of 1642 is recorded one from Peter Jop, an Aber
deen sailor, praying for the release from prison
of his wife, an " excommunicat Papist." The
Lords wrote accordingly to the magistrates and
1 Chambers, Domestic Annals, vol. ii. pp. 139, 140.
THE KIRK AND LORD DOUGLAS. 35
ministers of Aberdeen, directing that the prisoner
should be liberated, but only on condition of con
formity to the Kirk, or banishment beyond seas ;
and the unfortunate Jop could obtain no further
satisfaction, except a few months' extension of
the time of grace accorded by the Council, on the
ground of his wife's precarious health.1
The last victims of the inquisitorial zeal of the The Kirk
17" 1 j_l 1 • i an(l the
ivirk that we need at present notice were the Marquis
Marquis of Douglas (formerly Earl of Angus)
and his wife, a daughter of the first Marquis of
Huntly. Both were known as firm adherents
of the Catholic faith, and as such were a constant
thorn in the side of the Lanark Presbytery, within
whose jurisdiction they resided. Preachers were
sent from time to time to Douglas Castle to labour
for the conversion of the family ; and the usual
methods — including religious discussions, interfer
ence in domestic arrangements, and menaces of
excommunication — were long employed without
effect. Wearied out at length with their solici
tations, the marchioness consented to attend the
parish church, and to permit her children to be in
structed in the Protestant catechism ; but it was
six years before her husband could be induced by
similar means to conform to the Presbyterian wor
ship. In neither case, of course, was the conformity
more than merely external ; and it was not long March
before the Presbytery again brought formal com-
1 Privy Council Records Chambers, loc. cit.)
1650.
36 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
plaint against the marquis and his wife for
having sent one of their daughters to France
"to be bred in Popery," and having placed one
of their sons also at the French Court. They
were urged to recall them at once to Scotland,
but this they refused to do. How little cause
for satisfaction the Presbytery found in the sup
posed conversion of the noble pair, was shown
by the further complaint that they hardly ever
attended public worship or had private exercises
at home.1 More than six years later — in Sep
tember 1656 — we find the Presbytery making
the same complaints, and fulminating the same
threats against the marquis and his family. " A
peer or peeress," as Chambers caustically ob
serves,2 " seems to have been a particularly diffi
cult person to excommunicate. Years elapsed in
such cases without effecting the object, while a
Quaker villager could be conclusively thrust out
of the Church in a few weeks."
Measures It is hardly necessary to say that the tyran-
directed J •'
SthSicthe nous Prosecuti°n of the Kirk was not directed
clergy. against the Catholic laity alone. It was indeed,
as we should expect, principally aimed against
the devoted men who had dedicated their lives
and labours to preserving the faith, by preaching
and administering the sacraments, among the
1 Register of the Presbytery of Lanark (Chambers, vol. ii. pp. 190-
194).
2 Op. cit., vol. ii. p. 242.
ENACTMENTS AGAINST PRIESTS, 1629. 37
scattered and proscribed Catholics of Scotland.
The Privy Council proclamation of 1628, to which
we have already referred, made special mention
of a number of Catholic clergy who were at that
time labouring in the northern part of the king
dom. The priests named in this document were
"Mr Andrew Steven, Mr John Ogilvie, Father
Stitchill, Father Hegitts, Capuchin Leslie, com
monly called The Archangel; 1 Mr William Leslie,
commonly called The Captain; Father Christie,
commonly called The Principal of Doivie, with
two other Christies ; Father Brown, son to James
Brown at the Nether Bow of Edinburgh ; Father
Tyrie, three Kobertsons called Fathers, Father
Kobb, Father Patterson, Father Pittendreich,
Father Dumbreck, and Dr William Leslie." These
ecclesiastics are characterised as "the most per
nicious pests in this commonweal ; " and it is
commanded that " none presume to receive, sup
ply, nor furnish meat, drink, house nor harboury
to them, nor keep company with them," under the
severest penalties.2
Still more stringent were the provisions con- stringent
, • i • ,1 . . 1 • T i enactments
tamed m the commission issued in July 1629. against the
TI '• 'ii i IT 111 priests,
in these it is specially ordered that should the Juiyit>29.
priests or other delinquents fly to fortified places,
the commissioners should " follow, hunt and pur
sue them with fire and sword, assiege the said
1 See ante, vol. iii. p. 410, note ; and post, pp. 75 et seq.
2 Chambers, op. cit., vol. ii. p. 22.
38 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
strengths and houses, raise fire, and use all other
force and warlike engine that can be had for win
ning and recovery thereof, and apprehending of
the said Jesuits and excommunicate Papists being
therein." l Notwithstanding, however, the sever
ity of these enactments, which can only be com
pared to the edicts of the Roman emperors against
the Christians of the early Church, there were
not wanting members both of the secular and
regular clergy who continued with unabated zeal
their efforts to preserve the Catholic faith among
their co-religionists in Scotland.
cardinal On October 2, 1623, Pope Urban VIII. nomi-
protectorof nated as protector of the Scotch Catholics his
Scotland. . . . „,
nephew, Cardinal Francis Barberini. Lhe car
dinal, who held this office for upwards of half a
century, gave hospitable entertainment to Scotch
pilgrims to Rome — more especially at the time
of jubilee in 1625 — and also afforded charitable
succour to many impoverished families of the
same nation.2 On May 18, 1630. Pope Urban
granted to him extensive faculties both for Eng
land and Scotland, including permission to ordain
candidates from either country without dimis-
sorials or titles, to reconcile heretics, to offer the
holy sacrifice in private houses and prisons, to
dispense from matrimonial impediments and vows,
1 Chambers, op. dt., vol. ii. p. 24.
2 Cardella, Memorie Storiche, torn. vi. p. 238. "Diede cortese
alloggio ai Greci, Scozzesi, &c."
RICHARD SMITH, VICAR- APOSTOLIC. 39
and to sanction vernacular translations of the
Bible, and the perusal of prohibited books, with
a view to their refutation.1 Five years previously
the same pontiff had named Dr Richard Smith Appoint
ment of
bishop of Chalcedon in succession to the deceased Richard
Smith as
Dr Bishop, and had appointed him at the same ^k^t"olic
time vicar - apostolic of England and Scotland. §52^*
The new prelate was consecrated at Paris on
January 12, 1625, by Cardinal Spada, nuncio to
the French Court ; and a few weeks later Urban
VIII. addressed to him the beautiful letter com
mencing1 " Ecclesia Romana sollicita," 2 and con
veying the necessary faculties. In the following
March the Pope granted to the vicar-apostolic
permission to administer the sacrament of con
firmation without the pontifical vestments."3
Bishop Smith appeared at first to justify the Difficulties
1 . \ r , . encoun-
hopes raised by his appointment ; and his zeal temi i>y
was commended by Urban VIII. , who looked prelate.
forward with joy to a revival of the Catholic
religion in England under the guidance of the
new prelate and with the support of the queen.4
But the bishop, owing to the unfortunate compli-
1 Bv.llar. »S'. Congr. de Prop. Fide, Append, ad torn. i. pp. 180,
181.
2 Ibid., p. 161.
3 Brady, Episcopal Succession, vol. iii. p. 74. " Congr. S. Officii —
Die 20 Martii, 1625, eidem Episcopo Chalcedonensi Sanctissimus
concessit facultatem administrandi sacramenta (sic) confirmationis
sine vestibus pontificalibus in casu necessitatis in Regnis Anglia?
et Scotise tantum."
4 Pope Urban's letter to Bishop Smith is given in Appendix I.
40 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
cations into which he was brought by disputes
with the missionaries, the countenance he gave
to the uncanonical chapter erected by his pre
decessor, and constant collisions with the regular
clergy, soon found his position untenable. Pope
Urban intimated to him in unmistakable terms
that he was in no sense ordinary of England, but
merely a delegate of the Pope, with limited and
revocable powers ; and the bishop shortly after-
- wards asked and obtained permission to resign
his office, and retired to France, where he died in
1 655.1 Various efforts were made to obtain the ap
pointment of a successor. Queen Henrietta Maria
recommended to the Holy See (which was at that
time vacant) an ecclesiastic named Clifford,2 while
the Archduke Leopold proposed to Pope Alexander
VII. the name of Canon Henry Teller.3 These
1 Laemmer, Mantissa, p. 322 ; Cod. Corsin. 283, fol. 9 et scq.
" Ma morto poco tempo dopo il sudetto Vescovo di Calcedonia, quale
arrivato in Inghilterra turbo piu che mai lo stato di quei Cattolici,
mentre subito pretese essere FOrdinario d'lnghilterra et anco di
Scotia, si opposi alii Missionarii Apostolici, formo tribunale, con-
ferm6 il Capitolo, impose pensione ai laici, et in somma suscit6 una
fiera contesa fra lui et i Regolari. Onde la s.m. d'Urbano nel 1627
dichiaro nella Congregatione del Santo Ofticio, ch' il Vescovo Calce-
donense non era Ordinario d'lnghilterra, ma semplice Delegate con
facolta limitate e revocabili a beneplacito del Pontefice."
2 Record Office. Copy of letters of princes (Archiv. Vatic.), vol.
Ixxix. fol. 21. Letter of the Queen-Dowager from Paris.
3 Record Office, I.e. vol. Ixxviii. p. 212. "El clero de Anglaterra
me ha escrito una carta, cuya copia remito al Duque de Terranuova
... en que me dice, que por haver muerto Obispo Chalcedonense . . .
me pide interponga mis officios con V. Bd. paraque les diese este
consuelo proponiendome la persona del Canonigo Henrique Teller,
nacido en estos estados, aunque de Padres Ingleses."
NEED OF A MISSIONARY SUPERIOR, 41
recommendations, however, remained without re
sult. England was now in the throes of revo
lution, and provision had already been made for
Scotland by the appointment of William Ballan-
tyne (or Bellenden) as prefect of the mission.
More than thirty years before, we find the
name of Father Silvanus as superior of the Bene
dictine missionaries in Scotland. On July 22,
1627, he appears for various reasons to have been
relieved of this office, which was conferred on
Father William Ogilvy, Abbot of St James',
Wurzburg.1 The lapse of time, however, made
increasingly evident the necessity of some su- Necessity
preme ecclesiastical authority in the country, rior over
which should be acknowledged by seculars and tish mis-
** sion.
regulars alike. A report written by David
Chambers, who was sent on the Scotch mission
in 1631, lays special stress on the desirability
of the appointment of a prefect invested with
episcopal rank. The Congregation appears to
have considered the proposal favourably, but no
steps were taken to carry it out.2 A few years
1 Archiv. Propag. (Scozia) Scritture riferite, i. 11. "II P. Silvano
destinato superiore de Benedittini Scozzesi nelle missione di Scotia."
Also i. 14. " Al Padre Silvano Benedittino si revoca per vari
rispetti la prefettura colle facolta per la missione di Scotia, e si
dichiara per nuovo prefetto il P. Gulielmo Ogilbeo, Abbate del
monastero di S. Giacomo di Erbipoli."
2 Archiv. Propag. I.e. i. 18. " David Camerario, il quale ottenne
la missione di Scotia 1'anno 1631, transmette la relazione dello stato
di quel regno, con rappresentare la necessita di costituire un Supe
riore costituito in dignita vescovile. Fu risoluto per 1'affermativa,
mission.
42 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
later, in August 1640, we find negotiations being
carried on for the revival of the ancient see of
the Isles, to which it was proposed to nominate
an Irish Franciscan named Hegarty. Among
those who warmly advocated this scheme was the
Bishop of Down and Connor, in Ireland. The
Congregation, however, decided to postpone its
consideration until they had received further in-
«/
formation on the matter.1
In the year 1G53 the Congregation of Propa
ganda had before it a large number of proposals
designed to improve the condition of the Church
in Scotland. Some of these related to the sucr-
o
gested increase in the number of missionaries and
in the provision for their support, and others to
the advisability of extending the authority and
faculties of the prefect. It was also proposed
si per essersi cresciuto il numero dei Cattolici, si perche vi sia
persona da opporsi al Vescovo Lismorense (eretico)."
1 Archiv. Propag., Acta Session., fol. 148, 20 August 1C4(».
Promotio Patritii Hegertii ad Ecclesiam Sodorensem in prredictis
insulis Hebriduin. The reply was Dilata.
Gordon (Scolichronicon, vol. iv. p. vi) prints the following inter
esting testimony of F. Semple, S.J., rector of the Scotch College at
Madrid, to the advantages anticipated from the appointment of
Father Hegarty : " I have desired for many years to see a bishop in
the wild islands of the Hebrides, to instruct and form the priests,
to settle disputes among the Catholics, and to administer the Sacra
ments of Orders and of Confirmation. ... I knew of no one better
fitted for the office than the Prefect of the Franciscans in the Scotch
Mission, in whom all the characteristics of a good pastor are to be
found. I have sent him and his companions some ecclesiastical
ornaments and some alms, and I will do my best every year to
relieve his necessities."— TRANSLATOR.
BALLAXTYXE PREFECT OF THE MISSION. 43
that the aid of the King of France should be
enlisted, both in the education of Scotch clergy,
and in effecting a cessation of the persecution
of Catholics in Scotland : and, finally, that a
visitor should be appointed to report as to the
state and needs of the missions.1 The most
important outcome of these proposals was the
incorporation of the secular clergy into a mis
sionary body, under the direction of William
Dii T» 11 i \ • Ballantyiie
rJallantyne (or Bellenden) as prefect of the mis- appointed
„ _. . prefect,
sion.- Born of Protestant parents (his father 1653.
was the minister of Douglas in Lanarkshire), and
a nephew of Lord Newhall, a judge of the Court
of Session, Ballantyne was educated in Edin
burgh, and afterwards, travelling in France, em
braced the Catholic religion in Paris. In 1641
1 Archiv. Propag. Scritture rifer. i. 26, aim. 1653. "Rimedi pro-
posti alia S. Congr. 1. Si accresse il uumero del missionarii con
assegnare a ciascuno una competente provisione. 2. Che si desse
facolta al prefetto delle missioni di chiamare gli alunni di tutti i
collegi Scozzesi. 3. Che il prefetto abbia autorita di prescrivere a
ciascuno dei missionarii 1'impiego. 4. Che si desse al medesimo la
facolta di consecrar calici. 5. Che si provedessero i missionarii con
paramenti. G. Che si destinasse un uomo dotto a tradurre libri
spirituali e di controversie. 7. Che si facessero aprire scuole cat-
toliche nel Regno. 8. Che si aprisse un ospitio, nel quale i mis
sionarii prima di andare alia missione si esercitassero nelle funtioni.
9. Procurare che il Re di Francia assegnarse ai Scozzesi uno dei
Collegi vacant! nell' universita del Regno. 10. Che per mezzo del
nominate Re si procurasse che li ministri e magistrati eretici non
perseguitassero i sacerdoti di Scotia, e finalmente che si mandasse
in Scotia un visitatore, mezzo migliore e unico per sapere lo stato e
i bisogni della missione."
2 Archiv. Propag. Scritture rifer. i. 25, ami. 1653. " Si forma la
missione di Scotia dichiarandosi prefetto di essa il Bannatino."
44 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1G25-16GO.
he entered the Scotch College at Rome to pre
pare for the priesthood. Here he gave proof
of more than ordinary ability and industry, twice
publicly defending theses, which he dedicated
to Lord James Douglas. After his ordination
to the priesthood, Ballantyne spent upwards of
two years in the Scotch College at Paris, and
while there had the happiness of reconciling to
the Church his younger brother, who had been
page to the Elector Palatine, and had since risen
to be major in the Covenanting army. In 1649,
Father Ballantyne arrived on the mission in Scot
land, where a very short residence sufficed to
convince him of the indispensable necessity that
existed for the appointment of an ecclesiastical
superior, endowed with proper authority at home,
and competent to represent the interests of the
mission abroad. Returning to Paris in 1G50, he
consulted with his friends and former fellow-
pupils, and succeeded in warmly interesting Car
dinal Barberini, the papal legate, in the project
which he had at heart. The cardinal was ac
companied on his return to Rome by Father
William Leslie, who used every effort to obtain
the desired concession from the recently founded
Congregation of Propaganda. At length, in 1653,
decrees were issued, organising the Scotch mission
under a prefect - apostolic, and naming Father
Ballantyne to the office. At the same time, pro
vision was made for the annual payment of five
IMPRISONMENT OF BALLANTYNE. 45
hundred crowns, for the support of ten mission
aries in Scotland.
Meanwhile the zealous priest, who had some Labours of
Ballantyne
time previously returned to Scotland, was prose- \l^oi'
cuting his missionary labours with singular de
votion and success, among those whom he recon
ciled to the ancient faith being the Marquis of
Huntly, and many others who had fallen away
during the persecutions. In 1656, Father Ballan
tyne set out for France, in order to be present at
the religious profession of a sister of the Mar
chioness of Huntly. His vessel was captured by
an English cruiser, and the passengers brought
prisoners to Ostend. The prefect was treated
with respect, and very shortly set at liberty ; but
being suspected and denounced to the Govern
ment by Lord Conway, one of his fellow-passen
gers, he was arrested at Rye, immediately on his
return to England, and sent to London. For
nearly two years he remained in confinement, His im-
. , . -ii ii prisonment
winning durmg this period the esteem and ad- in London,
r 1656.
miration of Cromwell's secretary, Thurlow, who
had frequent interviews with him. On his libera
tion he repaired to Paris, where he received from
Rome the sum of fifty pounds to defray the ex
penses of his imprisonment.1 In May 1660 the
1 Archiv. Propag. Scritture rifer. i. 32. " II Bannatino capita
prigione e sta due anni nelle career! di Londra, con debito per 200
scudi e fa istanza di esser sovvenuto per pagar il debito. La S.
Congregazione la rimette al Nunzio di Francia." — See Gordon,
Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 520.
Death of
Ballan-
tyne, Sep
tember
1661.
Religious
state of
Scotland
under
Cromwell.
46 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
prefect returned once more to labour in Scotland,
where, however, he survived little more than a
year. Before his death he had the consolation
of receiving the abjuration of his old friend and
fellow-missionary, Father Crichton, who had un
happily fallen away from the faith. Father Bal-
lantyne spent the last months of his life in the
house of the Marchioness of Huntly, at Elgin,
and expired there on September 2, 1661. He
was buried in the vault of the Huntly family, in
the cathedral of Elgin, a large number of Pro
testants, including the magistrates and citizens
of the town, accompanying his remains to the
grave.1
There is preserved in the Barberini library at
Rome an anonymous manuscript, containing an
interesting report of the state of the Scotch
mission at this time.2 It is entitled " A Letter
from the Superior of the Mission in the Kingdom
of Scotland to the Cardinals of the Congregation
of Propaganda ; " and having been written, as we
learn from its contents, during the time of the
Protectorship of Cromwell, might be supposed to
have emanated from Ballantyne himself, who did,
1 Archiv. Propag. Scritture rifer. i. 34, ann. 1661. " Muore il
Bannatino in concetto di molta bonta di vita anche appresso li
eretici dimostrato coll' honore fattogli da medesimi nel tempo del
suo iunerale."
2 Cod. Barber, xxx. 132, foil. 127-135. " Epistola Superioris
missionis Eegni Scotiee ad Emmoa Cardinales Congregations de
Propaganda Fide." A translation of the document is given in
Appendix II.
SCOTTISH CATHOLICS UNDER CROMWELL. 47
as we know from other sources, send to Rome a
report of his missionary labours. The document,
however, was apparently penned, not by Father
Ballantyne, but by one of his fellow-workers 011
the mission, for the writer makes repeated men
tion of the prefect, who, he informs us, had in
trusted to him the task of replying to certain con
troversial works lately put forth by the preachers.1
According to the report, it was to the influence
and the importunity of these preachers that the
persecution of the Scottish Catholics under Crom
well was chiefly due.2 They spared neither cal
umnies nor violence in order to check the con
stantly increasing number of the adherents of the
old faith ; and the system of domestic inquisition
and apprehensions on charges of Popery was be
coming daily more intolerable. The writer relates
how he himself, with two other priests, was cap
tured in the castle of Strathbogie ; and he adds
that the commander of the guard assured him
that he had in his possession an exact and de
tailed description of every priest in the country.
He himself was soon set at liberty, but his com-
1 Ibid., fol. 129. " Quare ex rogatu prsefecti missionis et mul-
toruni catholicorum illi libro respondendi mihi ojius impositum
est."
2 Ibid., fol. 127. "Edictum, quod superior! anno importunitate
et calumniis ministrorum contra Sacerdotes et Catholicos a Pro-
tectore Cromwellio extortum est, sex mensium spatio irritura
permansit ; omnes enim magistratus illud exsequi detrectarunt,
donee tandem initio quadragesimaj prsesidiarii quidam anabaptistre
niultum a ministris sollicitati illud praistiterunt. "
48 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
panioiis were detained for several months in prison
at Edinburgh. The narrator goes on to denounce
in vigorous terms the mendacious and calumnious
utterances of the ministers, who had recently pub
lished at Aberdeen a work purporting to prove,
on the testimony of Catholics, that Rome was
Babylon, and all the Popes antichrists, from
Boniface III. downwards. Tracts had also been
circulated attacking the doctrine of the Real
Presence in the Eucharist ; and to these, as well
as to the former work, the writer states that he
was engaged, by desire of the prefect, in preparing
replies, which he hoped would shortly be printed.
conver- The number of conversions to the Catholic faith,
sioiis to .
he adds, was daily increasing, notwithstanding
all the efforts of the preachers. Members of the
highest nobility of the country — whose names, in
view of the prevailing persecution, the writer
deems it prudent to withhold — as well as of the
inferior classes, had hearkened to the voice of
truth and sought reconciliation to the ancient
Church.1 Some remarkable instances are given
o
in the report of the power exercised by the min
isters of the Church over the preternatural mani
festations of diabolic agencies, — incidents which
the writer testifies to have tended not a little to
1 Cod. Barberin. I.e. fol. 130. " Ex plebe autem tanta conversio
facta est, prrecipue in Stradaria provincia partibus montanis
proxima, et in dominatu Straboggiensi, ut in priore loco plures
iique honestiores venerandis catholicorum mysteriis quam profano
hsereticorum cultui intersunt."
SECULAR MISSIONARIES IN SCOTLAND. 49
the confusion of heretics and the conviction of
atheists, already too numerous.
During; the period of which we are now treat- Secular .
1 priests on
ing, there was never wanting a succession
zealous and devoted priests, both of the secular
and regular clergy, to serve on the mission in
Scotland. The number of secular priests, how
ever, in the country, during the reign of Charles I.
and the rule of Cromwell, was very limited. In
the year 1653, when we first have accurate in
formation on the subject, they appear to have
numbered only five, including the prefect, Father
Ballantyne ; and during the latter's term of office
they never seem to have exceeded six.1 It is to
this circumstance, doubtless, that we must attrib
ute the opposition of the regular clergy — them
selves at this time a much more numerous body —
to the nomination either of a prefect or a vicar-
apostolic, with jurisdiction over the whole of
Scotland.2
1 This is corroborated by the words of Mgr. Bentivoglio, the
nuncio at Brussels, in his report to the Holy See on the state of
Scotland under James VI. (Cod. Corsin., 35, E. 2, fol. 60.) "Si
che hora in quel regno appena si possono contare sei o sette sacer-
doti computato fra di loro qualche religioso dell' ordine di S. Fran
cesco." Gordon (Scotichronicon, vol. iv. pp. 627) gives, from an old
MS., a list of the secular priests on the Scotch Mission from the
year 1653. [The four companions of the prefect in that year were
Fathers Walker, Lumsden, Crichton, and Smith. — TRANSLATOR.]
- Archiv. Propag. Acta, 5 Aug. 1630, fol. 114. Report by Car
dinal Trivulzio : " Deputatum procuratorem Laurentium de Paulis,
Generalis Societatis Jesu procuratorem, qui multa opponit ne in
.Scotia superior constituatur. S. Congregatio jussit, eundem pro-
VOL. IV. D
50 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
Gilbert Among the secular clergy on the- Scottish mis
sion in the first half of the seventeenth century,
the name of Gilbert Blakhal deserves a foremost
place. In 1626 he entered the Scotch College,
and having been ordained priest at Easter 1630,
he returned to Scotland.1 Finding, however,
various obstacles in the way of his successful
labours on the mission, he betook himself to
Paris, where he acted for some time as assistant
to M. Dorsay, a councillor of Parliament, who
had taken orders when far advanced in years.
Blakhal also filled the office of confessor to Lady
Isabella Hay, daughter of the Earl of Errol, for
whom he succeeded in obtaining a prebend from
the Infanta Isabella Clara Eugenia of Spain, and
so rendering her independent of her Protestant
relations. In 1637, Blakhal came back to Scot
land, and shortly afterwards became chaplain to
Lady Aboyne, up to the time of whose death,
which occurred in 1643, he laboured, chiefly in
Aberdeenshire, with great zeal and success. The
date of his death is unknown.2
curatorem Laurentium ac alios procuratores in clicto decreto nomi
nates iternm audiri."
1 The editor of the Breiffe Narration assumes that Blakhal on his
ordination proceeded directly to Paris. The statement in the text
is made on the authority of Abbd M'Pherson (cited by Gordon,
Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 523), who gives in some detail the opposi
tion which Blakhal encountered in Scotland at the hands of the
Jesuits. — TRANSLATOR.
2 Blakhal has left us an interesting and valuable record of his
labours in the Breiffe Narration of Services done to Three Noble
Ladyes, published by the Spalding Club in 1844.
SECULAR MISSION ARIES IN SCOTLAND. 51
Contemporary with Blakhal, although some
years his senior, was Father Robert Phillip of Robert
Sanquhar, who in 1613 was denounced by his *
own father, carried to Edinburgh, tried, and con
demned to lose his head for the crime of being a
priest.1 The sentence was commuted to banish
ment, and Phillip retired to France, where he
became an Oratorian under Berulle, and after
wards accompanied Henrietta Maria to England
as one of her chaplains. In 1641 he again suffered
imprisonment for the faith. Thomas Chalmers Thomas
was another Scottish priest, who, after several
years in the mission at home, withdrew to France,
probably under sentence of banishment. He was
appointed almoner to Cardinals Richelieu and
Mazarin successively, and did much to assist the
mission in Scotland both with money and in other
ways.2 Alexander Robertson arrived in Scotland Alexander
f* /--* . Robertson.
from Germany in 1635, at a time when the per
secution was at its hottest ; and such, we are told,
were the efforts made to apprehend him, at the
instance of Weems, the minister of the Canongate
in Edinburgh, that he was forced to quit his
lodgings in a violent snowstorm, and to fly for
1 Gordon, op. cit., vol. iv. p. 607. Phillip confessed himself guilty
of having returned to Scotland " off purpois and intentioun to con
vert saules to the Romane religioun." He was accused (see Pitcairn,
Grim. Trials, vol. iii. p. 252) of having said mass on one occasion
"in grit solemnitie, with his mess claithes, consecrat alter, mess
buik, and with his uther superstitious rites and ceremonies belong
ing thairto." — TRANSLATOR.
2 Gordon, op. cit., p. 534.
52 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
Andrew his life. Another Father Robertson (Andrew), an
Robertson.
alumnus of the Scotch College at Rome, came on
the mission in 1621, and must have laboured there
for many years ; for in 1643 we hear of his capture
by the Laird of Birkenbog, and subsequent confine
ment, first at Aberdeen and then in Edinburgh.1
No one, perhaps, rendered better service to the
George Church in Scotland during this period than George
Cone, who may claim to reckon as one of the
most learned of the Scotch secular clergy in the
seventeenth century. He was of good family,
and was educated at the colleges at Douay and
Rome, completing his training at the university
of Bologna.2 Before entering the clerical state
he filled for some time the office of preceptor to
the son of the Duke of Mirandola, and he was
afterwards secretary successively to Cardinals
Montalto 3 and Barberini.4 Cone accompanied
Cardinal Barberini to Paris when the latter was
appointed legate at the French Court, and he
wrote there his interesting work on the religious
state of Scotland.5 He was highly esteemed by
1 Gordon, op. cit., vol. iv. p. 609.
2 He also spent some time in the Scotch College at Paris.—
TRANSLATOR.
3 Probably Andrea Peretti of Montalto (great-nephew of Sixtus
V.), who was named Cardinal-Deacon by Clement VIII. in 1596,
and died at Rome in 1629. See Novaes, Storia de' Sommi Pontefici,
vol. ix. p. 31.
4 Francesco Barberini, nephew of Urban VIII. (Cardella, Memorie
Storiche de' Cardinali, vol. vi. p. 239.)
0 De Diiplid Statu Religionis apud Scotos Lilri duo. Ad Illus-
GEORGE COXE. 53
Pope Urban VIII. , who named him canon of St
Laurence in Damaso, in Rome, and also ap
pointed him one of his domestic prelates, and
secretary of the Congregation of Rites.1
From the summer of 1636 until the autumn of coneatthe
1639 Cone occupied the important position ofchariesi.
Papal agent at the English Court ; and in his
letters addressed to Cardinal Barberini from
Hampton Court he has left us some interesting
particulars of his relations with Charles I.2 The
principal subject of his communications with that
monarch appears to have been the form of oath The oath
rr ofallegi-
prescribed by James I. to his Catholic subjects, ance-
and requiring them not only to profess their
loyalty and allegiance to the sovereign, but also
to expressly repudiate the doctrine that the Pope
has the power of deposing secular princes. The
Holy See had rightly refused to sanction such
an oath, as obviously going beyond the limits
of a lawful profession of loyalty, and censuring
a theological opinion on which no formal Papal
trissmum Prindpem Card. Barberinum, Magiue Britannice Protcctorem-
Komoe, Typis Vaticanis, 1628.
1 It seems to have been further intended, had not his death come
in the way, to bestow upon Cone a Cardinal's hat. " But had he
returned to this island with it," wrote Sir Thomas Urquhart (cited
by Burton, The Scot Abroad, vol. ii. p. 69), " I doubt it would have
proved ere now as fatal to him as another such like cap in Queen
Marie's time had done to his compatriot Cardinal Betoun."-
TRANSLATOR.
2 The letters in question, which are in the British Museum (No.
15,389), were first published by Eanke (Englische Geschichte im 17
Jahrhundert, vol. viii. pp. 136-140).
54 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
decision had been given. It would seem, from
Cone's own account of his conversation with
Charles on the subject, that the king was not
only indisposed to introduce a new and modified
formula, but was equally reluctant to comply with
the suggestion made to him by the Papal agents
that he should use his own authority to dispense
the Catholics from the obnoxious oath ordered
by Parliament. " Sire," was Cone's remark, " we
Catholics maintain that your Majesty stands
above the Parliament ; " to which Charles re
joined that this was true in principle, but there
was great difficulty in reducing it to practice.1
Self-con- The dilemma in which the king now found him-
tradictory
attitude of self was no doubt due, as Ranke points out, to
the king. . . r
his reluctance to abandon his well - known doc
trine of the divine right of kings, which neither
the Pope nor any other human authority could
subvert.2 Nothing could, in fact, have been
more self -contradictory than his present atti
tude ; for while, in theory at least, he claimed
for the Crown the most unlimited powers, he
showed himself in practice afraid or unwilling
to avail himself of them in order to dispense
1 Ranke, op. cit., vol. viii. p. 138. " lo disse, Sire, noi teniamo
Vostra Maesta sopra il Parlamente. Egli risposo che era vero, ma
die bisognava pensare alle difficoM grandissime, e pertanto era
piii facile al Papa di compiacerlo a dare licenza alii Cattolici di
pigliarlo."
2 Ibid. " II Re mi dimand6 se non mi pareva che fosse opinione
cattiva il sottoporre 1'autoritk regia ai capricci d'un uomo."
RELIGIOUS ATTITUDE OF CHARLES I. 55
his subjects from the legal obligation imposed
upon them.
It was doubtless the theological bias, with His injus
tice to-
which the mind of Charles was so deeply tinged, ^'a!',(ls,-lis
f * Catholic
that not only blinded him to any true notion of s
right and justice in relation to his Catholic sub
jects, but also prevented him from comprehending
the real position of his own Church. Before his
marriage he had, as we know, solemnly promised
freedom of belief and worship to the co-religionists
of his Catholic queen. When, however, appealed
to by Cone against the gross injustice of permit
ting Catholics to be continually harassed and
denounced for their faith, the king rejoined by
animadversions on the manner in which, as he
asserted, the Catholics had abused his clemency,
by openly solemnising baptisms and marriages,
and, not content with hearing mass in the queen's
chapel, holding unlawful assemblies in the court
and various apartments of the palace — thus, as
it appeared to him, courting their own destruc
tion.1 That the king not only failed to compre-
1 Ranke, vol. viii. p. 139. " Al che il Re rispose, che faceudo cosi,
non sarebbe facile il frenare 1'insolenza dei Cattolici, quali abusavano
talvolta della clemenza Sua con grave scandalo degli altri sudditi,
dicendo che non sapevano governarsi bene e goder dell' esercizio
private della loro religione, senza far atti publici per necessitarlo a
gastigarli, e di questo cont6 diversi esempli di matrimonio, batesimi,
testamenti e cose simili, e che non contentandosi di sentir messa
nella capella della Regina, si radimavano nel cortile e nelle stanze del
palazzo senza proposito, ed in somma che pareva cercassero il pro-
prio male."
56 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1025-1660.
hend his own duties towards his Catholic subjects,
but also the general condition of his kingdom,
seems clear from the remarks which he made
to Cone about the tranquillity of the country,
at a time when he had, in fact, entirely forfeited
the confidence of the people of Scotland. As
to his personal sentiments, they would appear
from Cone's narrative to have been at this time
more remote than ever from an approximation to
Catholicism, and he expressed himself as alto
gether opposed to any recognition of the Council
of Trent,1
Cone quits The mission of George Cone to the English
England. .
Court was thus, as we should have anticipated,
barren of result. In the autumn of 1639 the
His death, Papal ag;ent returned to Koine, where he died on
January
10,1640. January 10, 1640. His remains repose m the
church of St Laurence in Damaso, beneath a
monument erected to his memory by his friend
and patron Cardinal Barberini, and inscribed with
an appropriate epitaph.2
1 Ranke, vol. viii. p. 140. " Che la Chiesa Romana stava altiera
e resoluta in certe cose, come in defendere il Concilio di Trento."
2 The inscription runs thus : " D. O. M. Georgio Conneeo, Scoto
Aberdonensi, Patricii domini de Achry, ex antiqua Macdonaldi
familia, et Isabella Chyn ex Baronibus de Esselmont filio, qui inter
contempoi'aneos eloquentia et doctrina Duaci et Romse haustis,
librisque editis, immortalitati se commendavit, prudentia vero et
agendi dexteritate, summorum Principum et prpesertim Cardinalis
Barberini, in cujus aula diu vixit, cujusque legationes, Gallicanam
Hispanicamque secutus est, benevolentiam promeruit ; quern Ur-
banus VIII. Pontifex, ingeniorum maximus existimator, quanti
fecerit, et ad Magnre Britannise Reginam Henrichettam, in Catholi-
FOUNDATION OF MADRID COLLEGE, 1633. 57
A college for the education of Scotch secular The Scotch
College at
clergy was opened in 1633 in Madrid. It owed Madrid,
its origin to the generosity of Colonel William Colonel
\\ lillillil
Sempill, a cadet of the noble family of that name,
who spent many years in the service of the Span
ish monarchs. He was said to have been sent
by Philip II. with despatches to Scotland, and
after the dispersion of the Spanish Armada, to
have been thrown into prison by James VI.1
Escaping with much difficulty, he returned to
Spain, where he founded by his last will and
testament (dated February 10, 1633), a college
for the education of students for the Scotch
mission.2 The records of the Congregation of
Propaganda would seem to confirm the view that
the King of Spain was personally concerned in
the new foundation ; for we find the Congregation,
on February 19, 1647, recommending to the con
sideration of the Pope the king's petition that the
Scotch College should enjoy the same privileges as
corum solamen. allegatione, et iiigenti in ipsius morte quoe, ne in
editore loco positus clarius elucesceret, vetuerit ma'rore testatus est.
Obiit die 10. Januarii, an. 1640, in wdibus Vicecancellarii, qui
amico funus aniplissimum in hac Basilica faciendum curavit, et
monumentum posuit. *ws ev a-Koria epaivfi, Kal T) (TKoria avrb ov
Ka.Tt\al3tv. "
1 According to Cone (De Duplici Statu, p. 145), the object of
Sempill's mission to Scotland was to negotiate a marriage between
James VI. and the Infanta Isabella. — TRANSLATOR.
2 The charter of foundation is entitled " Escriptura de Fundacion
y Dotacion del Seminario de Coligiales Seglares Escoceses en la
Villa de Madrid." [It was printed at length in the Miscellaneous
Papers of the Maitland Club, 1834.— TRANSLATOR.]
58 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
other similar institutions in his kingdom.1 Owing
to a variety of causes, the seminary at Madrid,
which was usually administered by Spanish Jesuits,
was of but little benefit to the Scotch mission
for many years after its foundation. After the
suppression of the Society, however, the college
Transfer- was transferred to Valladolid, where it still con-
ence of the t
college to tinues to flourish ; and in 1772 Mr John Geddes
Valladolid.
(afterwards bishop) was sent out with twelve
Scottish students to take possession of the new
seminary.
The Jesuits Amoiw the labourers on the Scotch mission
on the . .
Scotch during the period of which we are now treating,
mission.
the Jesuit fathers of course occupy a conspicuous
William place. We have already spoken of Father Wil-
s.J. liam Christie (called the younger), who was said
in a letter from Father Mambrecht, dated April
7, 1628, to have converted upwards of four
hundred persons, and who assisted at the edify
ing death of the Marquis of Huntly, in July
1536. He appears to have been Rector of Douai
in 1650.2 Contemporary with him was Father
John J
Leslie, s.j. John Leslie, who came on the mission in 1623,
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 334, 19 Febr. 1647. Responsum.
"Si Smo placuerit, petition! ejus Majestatis esse annuendum, deleta
clausula quod dictum Collegium sit exemptum a jurisdictione
Nuntiorum Apostolicorum apud Eeges Catholicos pro tempore."
The above extract would appear to corroborate to some extent
the statement made by Oliver in his Collections, S.J. (p. 15), that
" the King of Spain was the founder ; yet some other individuals,
especially Col. Semple, were great benefactors." — TRANSLATOR.
2 Gordon, Scotichronioon, vol. iv. p. 536.
JESUITS OX THE SCOTCH MISSION. 59
and died seven years later. One of his letters to
Vitelleschi, the General of the Society, written on
September 30, 1633, gives an interesting account
of the recent entry of Charles I. into Edinburgh,
and his coronation at Holyrood, concluding with
some reflections on the conflicting sentiments and
passions by which the people were at that time
swayed.1 Another Father of the Society, named
John Robertson, appears to have twice suffered Joim Rob-
-n i Tt r i ertson, S. J.
imprisonment. Father Mambrecht, in his letter
cited above, dated April 7, 1628, says, "This
Father was still detained in prison ; " and sixteen
years later, we hear of his arrival at Douai, " cast
into exile after eleven months' imprisonment." 2
We learn from the same authority that Father
James Seton, whose zeal had made him specially James
obnoxious to the Protestant bishops, was forced
to fly from Scotland, and withdrew to Germany.
He subsequently returned to Scotland, but finding
himself unable to withstand the "heat of the
persecution and the virulence of the Kirk minis
ters," he sailed for Norway, and we hear no more Robert
of him afterwards.3 Robert Valens entered su?.en8>
" Plura hujus Parliament! acta in gravissimum et evidentissinium
Beipublicai et populi damnum tendunt, ut jactatum ex populi voce
f uerit, Eegis in Scotiam adventum Christi in Hierosolymum ingressui
similenj fuisse, cui Palmarum die canebatur Hosanna in excelsis,
&c. ; paucis diebus post ingeminabatur, Crucifige, crucifige. Nar-
ratum hoc ab Joanne Leskeo, Insularum non pridem Episcopo,
homine liberrimo, prandenti Begi in utriusque Eegni confinio ; quo
audito illico abstinuit a cibo."
2 Oliver, Collections, 8.J., p. 37. 3 2Hd., p. 38.
60 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
the Scotch College at Home in 1610, but left it
to enter the Society. A letter from him, dated
Edinburgh, June 16, 1626, describes the danger
he incurred by his residence in that city, where,
however, he was able greatly to console the perse
cuted Catholics. It was only with the utmost
difficulty that he had succeeded in evading the
vigilance of the Kirk, which had appointed twenty
" Puritan zealots " to hunt out the Catholics of
the town and neighbourhood. Forced at length
to fly to England, we learn from a letter of
Father James Mambrecht (April 3, 1644), that
Francis he had been apprehended and imprisoned.1 Fran-
s.J. cis Spreule had been a Presbyterian minister, of
considerable reputation for zeal and learning.
The Synod of Galloway appointed him to live
with Lord Nithsdale, whom he was to gain over,
if possible, to his own persuasion. So far, how
ever, from succeeding in his design, Spreule was
himself converted to the Catholic faith by Father
John Wilkie, Lord Nithsdale's Jesuit chaplain,
whom he followed into the Society. Under the
name of Murray, he afterwards laboured on the
mission in Scotland with much success. Another
John Jesuit Father, named John Smith, was living in
Smith, S.J. . , , . f /-( A
Aberdeen in 1656, under the name 01 bray. A
party of soldiers broke into the house of Robert
Warring, where he was residing, seized his books
and sacred vessels, and arraying themselves in his
1 Oliver, Collections, S.J., p. 39.
JESUITS ON THE SCOTCH MISSION. 61
vestments, marched in this fashion round the
market-cross of the city. Fortunately the mis
sionary himself escaped. Father Smith appears
to have been instrumental in the conversion, in
the year 1644, of the laird of Pitfodels, chief of
the family of Menzies.1
Prominent among the Scottish Jesuits at this
period were the two Fathers Mambrecht, John John Mam-
brecht,S.J.
and James. The former, who was also known
under the name of Du Pre, after serving on the
mission for some time, became confessor to the
French embassy in London. From his letter
already referred to, dated April 7, 1628, he
appears to have been well known to, and held
in esteem by, King James I.2 Early in 1626
Father Mambrecht returned to labour in Scotland,
but a few months later was apprehended at
Dundee, at the instance of the Bishop of Brechin,
and committed to Edinburgh jail. He was sen- Sentenced
T •• to death.
tenced to be hanged, and the death-warrant was
actually signed by Charles I., who, however, re
voked it at the earnest solicitation of his queen
and of the mother of the Duke of Buckingham.
The good Father thus escaped the martyrdom for
which in his loathsome prison he had continually
prayed ; and after long and rigorous confinement,
was banished from the kingdom in June 1627.
1 Oliver, Collections, S.J., p. 38.
-Ibid., p. 29. "Jacobo Eegi familiarissimus per annum fui,
etiam illi notus, ut Societatis nostrse."
62 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-16GO.
He retired to Poland, and ended his saintly life at
Warsaw three years later.1
The same year that Father John Mambrecht
- qu]'tted Scotland, his near relation, Father James,
brecht,s.j. entered upon his missionary labours. After re
siding for many years as chaplain to George
Seton, third Earl of Winton, he found himself
compelled by the fury of the persecution to seek
refuge for a time in England, but he returned to
Scotland very shortly afterwards. Writing on
December 17, 1640, he states his opinion that all
stfateeoivil their former and present afflictions are but the
Scotland, prelude to future evils. "Within the last ten
days," he continues, " orders have been published
throughout Scotland not to sell anything to
Catholics, or buy anything of them. Many are
already deprived of their rents and income.
Several Catholics have offered three-fourths of
their property, provided they may keep the re
maining fourth for the maintenance of themselves
and their families, and even this is refused. Nay,
our adversaries impiously swear that not a single
Catholic shall live or remain in Scotland by the
end of the year. ... A noble baron, seventy
years old and more, was seized in England, and
brought to Edinburgh, whose family they ruined,
whose property they have confiscated; at the
end of six months' imprisonment, he died most
piously on the 3d of the present month. On the
1 Oliver, Collections, S.J., p. 29.
JESUITS OX THE SCOTCH MISSION. 63
30th of November, the Feast of St Andrew, the
tutelary saint of Scotland, one of our Fathers
[apparently the writer himself] paid him a visit,
and succeeded on the following night, with
imminent danger to himself, to say mass, and
administer the holy sacraments. There is no
one for us but the good Jesus ; yet, if He be for
us, what matter who is against us ? The only
concern I have had during nearly the two last
years is, that I remain alone in this southern part
of the kingdom, and I have no one whose help I
can procure for the good of my soul, and every
hour I expect either to be taken, or compelled to
quit the country." 1 In a subsequent letter, dated
June 13, 1641, Father Mambrecht describes the
virulent persecution, then at its height in Scot
land. " The Puritans," he says, " seek to ex- violent
t'tjtlnitr.s
tinguish every spark of orthodoxy, that every against
vestige and the very name of Catholic may be
effaced. Against those who decline to take the
Covenant, the proceedings are carried on with an
extremity of rigour/' And writing a year later,
he describes the fanatical violence evinced by the
Kirk Assemblies in regard to the images of Christ
and His holy Mother, and narrates some curious
incidents attending the destruction of the vener
able market - cross of Inderhiden,2 in Fifeshire.3
1 Oliver, Collections, S.J., p. 29.
2 Query, Inverkeithing ?
3 Father Mambrecht relates that a mason had actually mounted
the scaffold for the purpose of breaking the sacred image ; but
64 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1G25-1660.
In this and subsequent letters Father Mambrecht
fives an account of the various tyrannical meas
ures enforced against Catholics, who were com
manded to dismiss all their Catholic servants, and
to send their children to heretical schools. Ten
years subsequently we hear of him again, a close
prisoner in Edinburgh jail, where he was visited
by Father Robert Gall, and received holy com
munion at his hands.1 After eleven months'
confinement, he was banished by order of the
Government, and retired to Douai.
The report given by Father Mambrecht of the
religious state of Scotland at this time is confirmed
Letters by letters written by Father Robert Gall himself
ertGaii, to Goswin Nickel, the General of the Society.1
S.J., tothe .
General. From these it appears that in the years 1647 and
1648 the Jesuit missionaries were the only priests
actually in the country, and that they were suf
fering the greatest hardships.2 Father Gall left
behind him, we are told, the reputation of a " solid
Alexander religious, an excellent scholar, and a discreet and
,sgj.vi vigilant superior." 3 Father Alexander Ogilvie
hastily coming down under pretence of wanting a tool, he fled from
the town, declaring that nothing would induce him to commit the
sacrilegious act. Another man was soon found to do the work ;
but he had no sooner accomplished it, than he was suddenly struck
with paralysis in every limb, and still continued helpless and
bedridden. — TRANSLATOR.
1 One of these letters, dated October 23, 1653, was intercepted, and
is published in Thurlow's State Papers, vol. i. pp. 538, 539.
2 Oliver, op. cit., p. 21. " Nunc, si unquam alias, verissime sunt
pauperrimi Jesu Socii ; vix enim habent ubi caput reclinent."
3 Ibid.
IRISH MISSIONARIES IX SCOTLAND. 65
also laboured in Scotland about this time, suffer
ing first several years' imprisonment and then
banishment for the faith. Another Jesuit Father
named Dempster, after teaching philosophy and Thomas
theology at the Scotch College in Rome, came on s.j?ps
the mission in 1650, and was made prisoner at
Edinburgh in the following year.1 During his
confinement he challenged the Presbytery of Edin
burgh to a religious disputation, and also wrote
an exhortation to Catholics to endure their trials
with patience. Father Dempster was afterwards
rector of the college at Rome, but returned to
Scotland in 1663. He died at Douai in 1667.2
Among the regular clergy labouring on the
Scottish mission during this period, we find not
only Jesuits, but also members of the Franciscan,
Capuchin, Benedictine, and Lazarist Orders. As
early as the beginning of the seventeenth century,
Irish priests began to cross over to Scotland, in Irish mis-
order to afford to the distressed Catholics of that hi Scot-
country the consolations of religion. These mis
sionaries appear to have been ecclesiastically sub-
1 Abbe M'Pherson relates that Dempster was betrayed by a sol
dier, who came to the father to make a pretended confession, and
whose comrades, by preconcerted arrangement, broke into the room
when the supposed penitent was on his knees. The same soldier
afterwards hired a room in the city and made a considerable sum of
money by exhibiting himself, for the charge of sixpence, attired in
Father Dempster's sacerdotal vestments. — TRANSLATOR.
2 The author has given in the Appendix three lists of Scotch
Jesuits, from 1593 to 1629. As these are merely reprinted from an
easily accessible work (Foley, Records S.J., vol. vii.), the translator
has thought it unnecessary to reproduce them.
VOL. IV. E
66 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
Fathers
Cone and
Brady,
O.S.F.
Fathers
Ward,
O'Neill,
and Heger-
ty, O.S.F.
Successful
labours of
Father
Ward.
ject to the Archbishop of Armagh, whom we find
claiming for the occupant of that illustrious see
the primacy not only of Ireland, but in past
times of Scotland also.1 In the year 1619 we
meet with the names of Irish Franciscans on the
Scottish mission. Edmund Cone, Patrick Brady,
and a lay brother called John Stewart, came to
Scotland in that year from the Irish convent at
Lou vain. After two years of fruitful labour, Cone
was thrown into prison, and subsequently ban
ished ; but a little later three more Franciscan
Fathers — Cornelius Ward, O'Neill, and Patrick
Hegerty — were sent to Scotland at the instance
of Fleming, Archbishop of Dublin. The nuncio
at Brussels, while sending to Rome Father Ward's
report of his labours, observed that he had charged
the archbishop to do all in his power to console
the missionaries, and to assure them of his sup
port.2
It was reported to Propaganda on February 6,
1626, that Cornelius Ward, of the Order of St
Francis, had reconciled to the Church three hun
dred and eighty-two heretics in the Hebrides.
1 See Moran, Hist, of the Archbishops of Dublin, vol. i. p. 363.
In a petition to Pope Paul V. in 1618, Peter Lombard, Archbishop
of Armagh, stated that the occupant of that see was " primus totius
Hibernine, et erat aliquando etiam Scotiae, et est antiquissimus
metropolitanus omnium Britannorum regnorum atque insularum."
2 Ibid., p. 365. " Lettera del Nunzio, 5 Gennajo, 1626. Ho ris-
posto all' Arcivescovo che conforti li suddetti missionari a seguitare
1'opera felicemente cominciata, assicurandolo che non se gli mancheiii
somministrare gli ajuti necessari."
CONVERSIONS TO CATHOLICISM, 1626. 67
Father Ward was also stated to have converted Converts
one of the principal Protestants of Caithness, who catholic
r . . faith.
was at the point of death, but who, after receiv
ing the holy viaticum, recovered his health, and
proceeded, " like another Paul, to confound his
heretical neighbours." Some singular circumstan
ces were also related in connection with a cemeterv
i/
in Skye, dedicated to St Ninian.1 A report from
the nuncio at Brussels, dated in September of the
same year, mentions further instances of conver
sions, among them, being that of " a young minis
ter from the mountain districts, named Reginald,"
whom the nuncio had sent to the new Irish Col
lege at Louvain.2 Writing in the following-
March, the nuncio refers to one of these converts
as the " Baron of Hilder," who, he adds, had been
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 31, 6 Febr. 1626. "Ex relations Fr.
Cornelii Vardeni Ordinis minor, de observantia, unius ex quatuor
missionariis ad partes Scotia mon tanas directis, infrascripta recitavi :
1°, Quod dictus frater in insulis Hebridibus ad partes occidentales
Scotite positis hrereticos 382 ad fidem catholicam reduxit. 2°, Quod
unus ex prsecipuis hsereticis Kinthisiae [Caithness] dum in extre
mis laboraret, ad fidem catholicam conversus sacro viatico sumpto
statim convaluit, et paulo post, sicut alter Paulus, confundebat alios
hsereticos. 3°, Et ult° quod in insula Sada [Skye] reperitur Capella
S. Niniani cum coemeterio, in quo 14 corpora Sanctorum requiescant,
et duo niira de ipsis referuntur : 1°, Quod animalia bruta dum cceme-
terium ingrediuntur, vel statim intereunt, vel gravi morbo labo-
rant ; 2°, Quod si ex dicto coemeterio aliquid asportatur, illud mira-
culose ad eum locum revertitur."
2 Ibid., fol. 121, 11 Septemb. 1726. The nuncio at Brussels re
ports : " 1°, Missionaries ad montana Scotire pleuissimam relationem
ad S. Congregationem misisse. 2°, Convertisse ministrum juvenem
Eeginaldum ex partibus montanis, quern Nuntius in novo Hiberniae
Lovanensium collegio collocavit."
68 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
thrown into prison, where he then lay at the risk
of his life, for openly professing his faith before
the Privy Council of Scotland.1 Robert Men-
teath, the minister of Duddingston, became a
Catholic in 1638, and was banished from Scot
land. He entered the ecclesiastical state in Paris,
where Cardinal du Retz bestowed upon him a
canonry of Notre Dame.2
Report of On April 16, 1627, the Congreofation received
Father .
Brady to from Edinburgh a report from a Franciscan mis-
Propagan-
i697April si°narv named John Brady, who states therein that
he had been attacked, when travelling, by four
teen ministers, thrown from his horse, and so
grievously wounded that he remained for an hour
all but lifeless. He further relates that his vest
ments and holy oil vessels were taken from him,
and publicly committed to the flames at Edin
burgh ; but that, to the wonder of all, the said
vessels with their precious contents remained un-
1 Arcliiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 145, 8 Mart. 1627. Report of the
Brussels nuncio : " Baronem de Hilder (?) Scotum, unum ex conver-
sis anno prseterito ad fidem catholicam, carcerilms fuisse mancipa-
tum, in eisque manere cum vitfe discrimine, quia coram Senatu
Scotise libere earn fidem professus est."
2 Menteath published in 1661 his Ilistoire dcs troubles de la
grande Bretagne depuis Van I633jusques 1649. The English trans
lation, printed in 1635, is entitled " by Robert Menteth of Sal-
monet." As to this latter designation, a strange story is told by
Chambers (Domestic Annals of Scotland, vol. ii. p. 70)— viz., that
Menteath, on his arrival in France, finding the advantages attach
ing to honourable descent, described himself as a " Menteath of
Salmonet "—which highly sounding title really meant nothing more
than that his father was a common fisherman, hauling a salmon-net
on the river Forth at Stirling !— TRANSLATOR.
CONVERSIONS IN THE HIGHLANDS. 69
injured in the midst of the fire.1 As many as
ten thousand heretics were said to have been Numerous
. . conversions
converted by the x1 ranciscans in the Highlands of in the
0 . . . Highlands.
Scotland, which had been in consequence divided
into some twenty missionary parishes. The Car
dinals appear to have doubted the accuracy of this
report, and to have referred for its confirmation
to the nuncio at Paris. Further inquiries corrobo
rated the statement as to the extraordinary num
ber of conversions, and the Congregation were,
moreover, informed that Father Cornelius Ward,
on account of his share in the work, had been kept
in the strictest confinement in London for fifteen
months, and less vigorously imprisoned for nine
more. He owed his liberation to the good offices
of the Polish ambassador, but was subsequently
banished.2 According to a report from the Scot-
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 212, 16 Mart. 1627. " 1°, Eundem
Johaimem a 14 ministris Scotis in itinere aggressum, et ex equo de-
jectum pluribus vulneribus fuisse confossum, ita ut per unam horam
exanimis permanserit. 2°, Eidem fuisse ablatas vestes sacerdotales
et vascula sacrorum oleorum, qvue omnia in platea Edinburgi pub-
lice ignibus tradita fuerunt, sed summa omnium admiratione con-
tigit, ut vascula praedicta cum sacris oleis intacta in mediis flammis
permanserint. 3°, Demum in montanis Scotia? numerus hoeretico-
rum per missionarios Franciscanos conversorum ad summam decem
millium auctum fuisse, ita ut jam 20 aut 22 parochiae per eosdem
missionarios fuisse institutse."
2 Hid., fol. 44, 4 April 1634. " Quod idem Pater Cornelius ac
ejus socii revera in prsedictis locis missionis fuerint, ibique multa
millia hominum ad fidem catholicam converterint ; et quod idem P.
Cornelius propter conversiones in insulis Hebridibus factas fuit in
strictissimo carcere Londini per 15 menses, et per alios 9 menses in
alio laxiori detentus, a quo tandem oratoris Regis Polonise officiis
liberatus fuit, addito exilio. Decretum ; Accusationem repellendam
70 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
tish Franciscans, submitted to Propaganda on
May 8, 1628, the number of persons converted
through their instrumentality amounted to ten
thousand two hundred and sixty-nine.1 One of
Relation of the Fathers, Patrick Hegerty, sent to the Con-
Haegherty, gregation in 1G33 a relation as to the results of
his labours in the Hebrides, from which it appears
that he had reconciled two thousand two hundred
and twenty-nine persons to the Church, baptised
twelve hundred and twenty-two, and solemnised
a hundred and seventeen marriages.2 At his
instance a grant of money was made by Propa
ganda in support of Fathers Brady and Ward,
who were now advanced in years. On July 19,
1638, Cardinal Pamfili (afterwards Pope Inno
cent X.) reported that according to a letter
received from Father Ward, that zealous mis
sionary had during the two previous years con
verted a thousand and seventy -four persons
(among them being a preacher), baptised a
hundred and ninety-one, and celebrated thirty-
one marriages. This statement was confirmed
by a letter subsequently received from the
Bishop of Down and Connor, in Ireland.3
missionemque prtedictam continuandam, si Dominus Georgius Con-
ceus nihil habeat in contrarium. Conaeus respondit, Nihil babeo."
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 61, 8 Maii 1628.
2 Ibid., 30 Sept. 1633. Relatio Fratris Patritii Ordinis Minorum
de observ. in insulis Hebridibus prope Scotiam.
3 Ibid., fol. 120, 19 Julii 1638. Moran (Spicileg. Ossor., vol. i.
p. 223) prints a report from Father Ward to the Bishop of Down
and Connor which gives a graphic picture of the life of the mis-
CONVERSIONS IX THE HIGHLANDS. 71
Father Hegerty wrote to the Prefect of the
Congregation from Bunmargy on October 31,
1639, that he had reconciled to the Church
some seventy persons, the majority being mem
bers of prominent families, in the Hebrides and
West Highlands ; and that these had been duly
admitted to the sacraments of penance and the
Holy Eucharist, in the Franciscan convent at
Bunmargy, and had afterwards been confirmed
by the Bishop of Down.1 In the following year
Father Hegerty was able to report that the
number of converts in the same district had
sionaries in the Hebrides. " The labour of the mission," he says
[we translate from the Latin original], " in those remote and
barbarous spots is almost indescribable, and beyond the belief of
the Romans. Sometimes the same missionary has been there in
different years for six months together, without tasting any kind
of drink except water and milk ; lacticinia [butter, cheese, &c.]
form their principal food, and in summer they can hardly procure
bread. In the Hebrides and the Highlands of Scotland there is no
city, no town, no school, no civilisation : no one can read except a
few who have been educated at a great distance from home. At
length when the aforesaid missionary found himself without wine
or hosts for the holy sacrifice, he betook himself by long and cir
cuitous routes, and not without great toil and hardship, to the city
of Edinburgh. And when he at last made his way back to the
mountains with the bread and wine, he fell into a very serious
illness."
1 Moran, op. cit., vol. i. pp. 245, 246. " This very year the God
of all consolation has deigned through my labours, however un
worthy, to turn to the Catholic faith some seventy Scotchmen,
sprung for the most part from distinguished families of the High
lands and Islands. All these, after confession of their sins and
reception of Holy Communion in this our convent of Bunmargy,
were fortified with the sacrament of confirmation at the hands of
the Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of Down and Connor."
72 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
reached a hundred and ten.1 A few years later
Father Scarampi, an Irish Franciscan, who was
desirous of sending to the Hebrides four mis
sionaries of his order — namely, Fathers Edmund
Cone, Patrick Brady, Paul and Daniel O'Neill—
Subsidy to was promised by Propaganda, for three years, a
the mission •>
rides6 Heb~ Paymen* °f sixty scudi for each of them.2 The
last document in the archives of the Congrega
tion, relating to the Franciscan mission in the
West Highlands, is a letter written by Father
Hegerty from Waterford on August 29, 1G44.
The zealous religious thanks God for his deliver
ance from prison, where he had been detained
five years by the Scottish Protestants, and begs
the support of the Congregation in resuming his
missionary career.3 The Franciscans had some
years previously, in 1G2G, endeavoured to secure
a permanent succession of labourers on the Scotch
mission, by founding, with the help of the Infanta
Isabella and other benefactors, a convent of their
Order at Douai.4
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 148, 20 Aug. 1640 (reported by
Cardinal Francesco Barberini). " Literte P. Patritii Hegertii, pre
fect! missionis fratrum minorum in Insulis Hebridibus et montanis
Scotioe, de conversione 110 Scotorum hrereticorum praecipuarum
familiaruni in dictis insulis degentium."
2 Ibid., fol. 181, 29 Nov. 1644, et fol. 304, 22 Jan. 1647.
" Benedictus sit Deus misericors, qui servi sui indigni humili-
tatem respiciens e carceribus, in quos hceretici me detruserant,
ibique in magnis serumnis per continues ferine quinque annos
jacueram, me eripere dignatus est." See the same author's Fruits
of Irish Faith (Scotland), pp. fi 8.
4 Dancoisne, Histoire des Establissements religieux Britanniques
CAPUCHIN MISSIONARIES IX SCOTLAND. 73
The Fathers of the Capuchin Order, as well capuchins
as the Franciscans proper, were distinguished by scotch
. ' mission.
the active and fruitful part which they took at
this period in the evangelisation of Scotland. On
May 23, 1608, Pope Paul V., at the instance of
Cardinal Maffeo Barberini, Protector of the Scot
tish Catholics, extended to the Capuchin mis
sionaries in that country the same privileges as
were already enjoyed by the other religious
orders. Among these missionaries the name of
Father Epiphanius Lindsay deserves a foremost Epiphaums
place. A scion of the illustrious family of that
name, he received his education in the Scotch
College at Louvain, and after receiving holy
orders returned to his native country, where he
was the means of reconciling a large number of
Protestants to the Church.1 Being, however,
O7
arrested and imprisoned, he was condemned to condemn-
-1,1 /^, -, i . . , i'<l to death
death as a Catholic priest, the penalty being and ban-
J & ished.
f ondes d Douai, p. 100. "Nous soussigne"s, frkres recollets de la
nation escossoisse, estons envoyd en ceste ville de Douay par nos
superieurs pour prendre possession de quelques maisons ... a
nous donne"es par le E. P5re Pasteur de Masny, etc. Etait signe :
Fr. Joannes Ogilvinus, prteses if. Min. Missionis Scotire : Fr. Sylv.
Eobertsonius, ejusd. missionis pruedicator."
1 Dempster, Hist. Ecclesiast. Gent. Scot., p. 434. "Epiphanius
Lindsay, nobili sanguine non longe Dumfrisio oriundus, sed factis
et morum continentia nobilior, Capucinorum regulfe se tradens,
crebro in patriam remissus, hsereticos disputando impietatis con-
vicit." The author of the MS. Jtfe'moire de la Mission des Capucins
prh la Reyne d? Angleterre styles Lindsay "le plus ancien, et j'ose
quasy dire le plus laborieux et plus zele des missionaires que j'ai
connus." See Eocco da Cesinale, Storia delle missione del Capuccini,
vol. ii. p. 401.
74 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
afterwards commuted to banishment. Lindsay
betook himself to the Netherlands, where he
entered the Order of Capuchins, and then re
turned to Scotland to labour on the mission.
Disguised as a peasant, he traversed the moun
tainous districts of the Highlands, exercising his
holy functions for the benefit of rich and poor,
and welcomed in every part of the country as
an angel of peace and reconciliation. We sub
join an extract from a letter written by Father
Lindsay to his brother in. religion, Cyprian de
Gamuches. " I came to Scotland," he says, " in
1620, only three priests being then known to
me ; and for ten years I exercised my ministry
in the southern and western parts of the country.
?futeraek ^en ^ere sPrang up a furious persecution of
the Catholics- A nobleman, with the approval
of the higher authorities, collected a force of
three or four hundred horse and foot, invaded
the dwellings of the Catholics, seized their
property, and threw them into prison. ... He
was succeeded by the preacher Eamsay, who
became insane ; then came John Brown, another
preacher, who died a sudden death; next a
viscount, who was carried off in ten days ; and
lastly a preacher named Gladmat (sic), who
proved the most bitterly hostile of all to the
Catholics. He burst into my house with an
armed party, tore up books and vestments,
seized the best things for himself, and had
FATHER ARCHANGEL LESLIE, O.S.F.C. 75
everything else publicly burnt. He proudly
bragged of these deeds from the pulpit ; but
two months later he bit his tongue through
with his teeth and gave up the ghost. Four
years I spent here quite alone, without any
companion. Three times I was betrayed, but
never taken : the first informer denounced me
to Lord Dunbar for a cloak and a hundred
marks, the second to the preacher Thomas
Renns, for a like sum. The preacher hunted
through the whole house with his bailiffs, but
did not find me, for I was concealed in the
neighbouring wood. The third informer be
trayed me to a Protestant kinsman ; but being
informed of the matter, I fled." In spite of his
disturbed and unquiet life, this father attained
to the great age of eighty-four, receiving from
the Jesuit Father Clerk the last consolations of
religion before his death. His name occurs in
the Records of Propaganda under the date
1647, in which year, on account of his having
failed to report on the state of his mission,
the allowance granted for his support was
diminished.1
Another well-known name among the Capuchin
missionaries in Scotland at this time is that of
Father Archangel Leslie, an account of whose Father
. . P Archangel
career was given by Rinuccim, Archbishop of Leslie.
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, 22 Januar. 1647. "Unam tantam
annatam scutorum 50."
76 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
Fermo, in his singular work entitled // Capu-
cinno Scozzese.1 According to Rinuccini, George
Leslie was born at Monymusk, near Aberdeen,
His con- of Protestant parents, and was converted to
version.
Catholicism at Paris, whither he had been sent
for his education. In company with two friends,
he travelled by way of Milan and Loretto to
Rome, entered the Scotch College there, and
Enters the subsequently resolved to become a Capuchin.
Capuchin
Order. He was at first refused admission, whereupon
he sought an audience of Pope Paul V., to
whom he narrated the history of his youth,
his conversion, and disinheritance. " Go in
peace," were the Pope's words; "and if the
Father - General still hesitates to receive you,
say to him in our name that we ourselves admit
you into the Order."2 We next hear of the
young Capuchin, now Father Archangel, ap
pointed court - preacher to Mary de Medicis,
Regent of France, and a little later associated
with two other Fathers of his Order, named
Joseph and Leonard, in a missionary journey to
Great Britain. Leslie entered England in the
o
1 Many of the details given in Einuccini's biography are evidently
more romantic than correct. The editor of the Historical Records
of the Family of Leslie points out (vol. iii. pp. 433, 434), among other
errors, that Father Archangel could not have been a son of Count
Leslie, as the contemporary Counts of that name never lived in
Scotland ; and secondly, that his father was certainly not proprietor
of Monymusk (which never belonged to the Leslies at all), but
James Leslie of Peterstone.— TRANSLATOR.
2 Raess, Die Convertiten seit der Reformation, vol. xi. p. 134.
FATHER ARCHANGEL LESLIE, O.S.F.C. 77
capacity of interpreter to the Spanish ambas
sador, who was at this time despatched to
London to negotiate a marriage between the
Infanta and the Prince of Wales. From London
he hurried to Scotland, presented himself, un- His arrival
ou the nns-
recognised, in the guise of a traveller, at his jj°"tl^ml
mother's house, after an absence of more than
twenty years ; and after a short time succeeded
in reconciling1 both her and other members of
o
the family to the Church. Many other persons
in the neighbourhood of Aberdeen were con
verted through his means ; l and among the
higher classes especially he laboured with much
success. From a report sent by him to Propa
ganda in 1626, we learn that many Scotch
Catholics were at this time in the habit of
attending Protestant sermons, and that the
missionaries, who found it a hard matter to Difficulties
support themselves, were afraid of reproving toners.
them for so doing, lest they should be refused
admission into their houses. It was urgently
necessary, therefore, that the Congregation
should assign to some of these priests a stipend
of two hundred florins.2
1 Rinuccini, II Capucinno Scozzese, p. 112. "Nel spazio di otto
mesi convertinne piu di tre mila."
- Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 38, 31 Martii 1626. "Ex relatione
Fr. Archangel! Capuccini. 1°, Scotos Catholicos condones hsereti-
corum passim audire, tribus, aut quatuor familiis, qui sacerdotes
peculiares sustentant, exceptis. 2°, Eosdem catholicos necessaria
inissionariis non subministrare. 3°, Eosdem missionaries non
audere per reprehensionem et adhortationem retrahere Catholicos
78 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
journey of Father Archangel quitted Scotland, and re-
Father
Archangel paired to Rome, in the year 1630. The reasons
to Borne. ... . .
of his making this journey are given by himself
in a letter written to Colonel Sempill at Valla-
dolid in January of that year.1 " For two
reasons," .he says, " I return to Italy ; first, be
cause the government of our missions has been
o
changed.2 . . . The second reason for my journey
to Italy is to exculpate myself from some calum
nies which have been imputed to me by the Con
gregation of Propaganda. To these calumnies I
shall oppose all the Catholic ladies and gentlemen
who, flying from the persecution, have arrived in
these parts ; for the many conversions which God
has made by means of me afford no trace of those
His own vile things which they impute to me. For God
account of
his labours has used me as an instrument for the conversion
in Scot
land. Of mv stepfather, of my mother and brothers, and
of all the family ; for the conversion of Alexander
Leslie of Afford, of his wife and sons ; of John
Gordon of Deuthdies, of his wife and sons ; of
a prasdictis conciouibus, quia metuunt, ne ob illas etiam in eorum
domibus recipiantur. 4°, Ob hanc causam necessarium esse, lit
S. Congregatio aliquibus sacerdotibus stipendia 200 florenorum
assignet."
1 The extract which follows is translated from a Spanish version
(preserved in the Scotch College at Valladolid) of the original letter.
The Spanish translator has, as will be seen, played havoc among
the Scottish names, many of which it is impossible to identify.
—TRANSLATOR.
2 The change of which Father Archangel complains appears to
have been caused by the appointment of a Frenchman as superior
of the Capuchin missions, and the consequent exclusion of mission
aries of other nationalities from Scotland as well as other countries.
See Historical Records, vol. iii. p. 421. — TRANSLATOR.
FATHER ARCHANGEL LESLIE, O.S.F.C. 79
Mr Regower, aged eighty years, and of his sons ;
of the Baron of Aquhorties, Leslie, and of his wife,
who made her first confession to Father Steven of
the Company [of Jesus] ; of the Baron of Pitcaple ;
of the Baron of Cluny, Gordon, whose father for
this cause sought to kill me ; of three entire
families in the hills of Badenoch ; of the laird of
Brunthill, Hays ; of the laird of Littlehill, Leith.
In Angus I converted the eldest son of Viscount
Oliphant, and one of his nephews, and two
daughters-in-law of the Baroness of Monorgan,
who died within eight days, having received all
the sacraments. In the village of Fowlis I con
verted two whole families. In the southern parts
of Scotland I converted the Viscountess Herries,
and the Baroness of Lockerbie, and three gentle
men of the name of Maxwell. I converted to a
good life the Baron of Lochinvar, who died in
my arms, and this nearly cost me my life. In
the west of Scotland I converted a daughter and
two sons of the Earl of Abercorn, and some ser
vants. In Edinburgh I converted Baron Ridhall
Hamilton, and other gentlemen, and his wife, who,
doubting the truth of the mass, heard a voice saying
three times, ' Rise, rise, rise, go to mass.' I must
omit innumerable other persons, both men and
women, for there is not a corner in all the kingdom
where I have not left the seed of faith. This is a
summary of all the souls I converted in Scotland,
and well known by all those acquainted with me.
And now, who are those who calumniate me ? "
80 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
The matter referred to in the above letter came
before the Congregation of Propaganda on April
22, 1631, when Father Archangel, on the testi
mony of a number of Scotch Catholics, who bore
witness not only to his exemplary life, but also
to his zeal in confuting heretics, and his excep
tional success in making converts, was declared
fully acquitted of the charges brought against
him.1 Provided with extensive faculties from
^°Pe Urban VIII.,2 he made his way again to
Sh,aiul Scotland, where he continued his zealous and
fruitful labours for several years. He died in
1637, attended at the last by a Jesuit priest, at
whose hands he received all the consolations of
religion. Thus closed a life distinguished, even
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 51, 22 April 1631. "Beferente E.
D. Tornielli litteras P. Leonard! Parisiensis Capuccini, prefect!
missionis Orientis et Anglije, attestationesque ab eo missas pro
justificatione P. Archangel! Capuccini, missionarii in Scotia, et
simul alias attestationes diversorum Catholicorum Scotia?, qui non
solum testimonium perhibent luculentissimum de vita exemplar!
P. Archangel!, ac de illius diligentiis ac studiis in confutandis
hfereticorum deliriis per libros publice editos, iisque convertendis,
ita ut ipse solus plus apud ipsos profecerit, quam ceteri religiosi
missionarii ; sed magna instantia petunt, ut remittatur ad mis-
sionem. Decret: E. P. Vicario General! pro arbitrio." Cf. Eullar.
Ordin. Capuccin., vol. vii. p. 331.
2 Ibid., fol. 13, 16 Januar. 1634. Cardinal Antonio Barberini
(of S. Onofrio, himself a Capuchin, and brother of Urban VIII.)
asks t,he following faculties for the Scotch Capuchins : " 1. Conse-
crandi calices et patenas. 2. Utendi habitu seculari, etiam in
itmere. 3. Habendi famulum et equum. 4. Eetinendi et utendi
pecuma, ubi aliter fieri non poterit. Decretum: S. Congregatio
censuit, si Sanctissimo placuerit, prater primam, reliquas facultates
oratoribus concedendas esse in Scotia, ubi est prohibitum exercitium
Cathohcse rehgionis tarn publicum quam secretum."
BENEDICTINES IN SCOTLAND. 81
in those troublous times, by trials of no ordinary
kind. The zeal for souls which burned in the
heart of the good missionary may sometimes have
led him into indiscretion. For this his ardent
nature, and the fervent gratitude for his own
conversion which filled his soul, may partly
account ; and we cannot but admire the extra
ordinary gift which he possessed of exercising
an almost unlimited influence over all with whom
he came in contact. We know little of the other
missionaries of his order who laboured with him
in Scotland. Among them were another Father
Archangel, of Pembroke, Fathers Richard and
Anselm, and four more whose names have not
been preserved.1
Of the Benedictine missionaries in Scotland at
this period, we have already made mention of
Father Silvanus, who, after being relieved of his Father
office of superior of the Scotch mission, seems to O.S.'B.
have resided for some considerable time in Ger
many. We find him early in 1627 petitioning
for a declaration from Propaganda to the effect
1 Rocco da Cesinale, op, cit., vol. ii. p. 418. Bullar. Ordin. Capuccin.,
vol. vii. p. 332. "Referente Emmo- D"° Cardinal! S. Honuphrii
instantiam Fratrum Capuccinorum Eichardi et Anselmi Anglorum
ad missionem Scotise destinatorum, pro licentia transferendi se a
Scotia in Angliam, ad procuraudani suorum consanguineorum et
affinium hoereticorum conversionem. . . . S. Congio- censuit ora-
torum petitionem esse annuendam, die 30 Januarii 1634." Father
Leander, O.S.B., in a report to the Holy See in 1634, mentions
" four Scotch Capuchins " on the mission in that year. (Flanagan,
Hist, of the Church in England, vol. ii. p. 323.)
VOL. IV. F
82 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
that the clause in his faculties, de consensu Orch-
narii, was to be understood of the Paris nuncio,
and not of the vicar-apostolic of England and
Scotland : a request which the Congregation
appears to have granted.1 An application made
by the same father, in the following year, for a
Papal visitation of the abbeys of Ratisbon, Wiirz-
burg, and Erfurt (in all of which monastic discip
line had become greatly relaxed), was followed by
a rescript addressed to the nuncios at Vienna and
Cologne, directing them to appoint a visitor from
the reformed Congregation of Lorraine. In May
of the same year (1628), orders were sent from
Propaganda to Father Silvanus, then living at
the Scotch monastery at Wlirzburg, to proceed
to Scotland ; but whether he actually went to the
mission or not does not appear.2
st Vincent The records of Propaganda give some account
of Paul and . ,
the Scotch oi negotiations between the Congregation and
,,,;..,,;„„ O
St Vincent of Paul with reference to the pro
posed despatch of missionaries to Scotland. The
founder of the Lazarists pointed out the diffi
culty there would be in finding among the French
secular clergy the requisite acquaintance with both
the English and Gaelic languages.3 He expressed
himself willing, nevertheless, to place the services
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 189, 22 Febr. 1627.
2 Ibid., fol. 76, 8 Mali 1628.
3 Ibid., Scritture riferite, p. 31 (1651). "II Padre Vincenzo de
Paulis, fondatore della religione delle missioni, richiesto dal Car-
dinale de Bagni per Nostro Signore cercare in Francia qualche
LAZARISTS OX THE SCOTTISH MISSIOX. 83
of the members of his newly -formed society at
the disposal of the Congregation, who accepted
his offer, declaring that the knowledge of one
language was sufficient. St Vincent accordingly
despatched two Irish priests to the Hebrides, and Lazarist
o, -11 mission-
a ocotch one to the mainland. One of the for- anesm
Scotland.
mer, Father Duggan, reported to the superior
the result of his labours in the Western Isles,
in letters dated October 1652 and April 1654. 1
He had, notwithstanding many difficulties, visited
most of the islands, where he had administered
baptism, put a stop to irregular connections, and
imparted instruction in Christian doctrine. He
had reconciled to the Church the father of Glen
garry, over ninety years of age, and a born Pro
testant ; 2 and had found the people everywhere
willing to listen to him. Father Lumsden,
another Lazarist missionary, also sent reports of
his missionary labours to St Vincent in the years
1654 and 1657. He had visited the Orkney Isles,
prete secolare atto a ministrare le mission! di Scotia, stima ci5
negotio difficile per la difficolta di trovare che sappia quelle due
lingue."
1 Abelly, Vie de St Vincent de Paul, vol. i. pp. 406, 408. " Les lies
que j'ai frequentees sont Vista [Uist] Canna, Egga et Skia, et dans
le continent le pays de Moordit [Moidart], d'Arasog [Arisaig], de
Moro [Morar], de Condirt [Knoydart] et de Cleangary [Glengarry]."
2 This was Donald Macdonell, the eighth chief of Glengarry.
He died in 1645, aged upwards of a hundred, having some years
previously, on account of his advanced years, resigned the actual
command of the clan in favour successively of his two sons and his
grandson ^Eneas (created Lord Macdonell in 1660). See M'Kenzie,
History of the Macdonalds, p. 328 et seq. — TRANSLATOR.
84 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
and, on the mainland, the counties of Moray,
Ross, and Caithness — "where," he adds, "no
priest has been for several years, and there are
but few Catholics." It was on the mainland
especially that the missionaries found themselves
Jealousy liable to collision with the preachers, who were
of the . \
preachers, jealous of the success of their labours, and had
recently obtained a fresh persecuting mandate
against them from the Protector Cromwell.1
Father Father Francis White was another Lazarist who
Frjiiicis
white. for many years faced with ardour and success
the perils and labours of the Highland mission.
In a report to Propaganda, dated December 10,
1668, Winster, the Prefect of the mission, men
tioned this devoted priest in terms of the highest
commendation.2 The religious condition of the
1 Abelly, Vie de St Vincent de Paid, vol. i. p. 411. " L'ennemy de
notre salut ayant suscitd une nouvelle persecution contre les catho-
liques par 1'instigation des ministres, qui ont obtenu un mandement
du protecteur Cromwell adressant h tous les juges et magistrats
d'Ecosse ; . . . et particulierement contre tous les pretres, qu'il leur
ordonne de faire mettre en prison."
2 Archiv. Propag. Scotia, Scritture riferite I. " Eelatio Winsteri,
No. 70. D. Franciscus Le Blanc [White] Hibernua, quadraginta et
quinque circiter annos natus. Parisiis in Congregatione Missionis
apud S. Lazarum philosophise et theologise operam navavit, ac
presbyter ordinatus est. In superiori Scotia per quindecim annos
se missionarium probavit turn laboris et miseriarum patientissimum,
turn salutis animarum cupidissimum, cui multum debet Scotia
superior." It is of this Father White that the well-known and
touching story is related, that when travelling with a brother
missionary in the wilds of Glengarry, he was called in by two
young men to see their aged father, who was apparently at the
point of death, but refused to make any disposition of his property,
declaring his conviction that his hour was not yet come. Ques-
MISSIONARIES IX THE HEBRIDES. 85
Hebrides was brouo-ht prominently before the Propagan-
•' . da and the
Congregation in the course of the following year. Hebrides.
In an interesting report, of a portion of which we
append a translation, Cardinal Rospigliosi repre
sented that the inhabitants of those islands were
in no sense Protestants, and only erred in reli
gious matters from want of instruction. They
kept the feasts of the Church, received with joy
the Catholic clergy, whom they called " tonsured
ones," and had retained many Catholic customs.1
tioned by the missionaries (of whose real character he and his sons
were as yet entirely ignorant) as to his grounds for this belief, he
replied that he was a Catholic, that for years he had prayed that
he might not die without the sacraments, and that he was certain
his prayer would be granted. His faith had its reward : Father
White and his companion at once revealed themselves, and admin
istered all the last consolations of religion to the dying man, who
speedily arranged his worldly affairs, and expired in peace. Father
White himself died in 1G79. His portrait hung in Invergarry
Castle, in a chamber known as " Mr White's Room," until the castle
was burned down in 1745. — TRANSLATOR.
1 Arch. Propag. Acta, 1669, fol. 402. " Relationes Erami- Dni- Card.
Rospigliosi. The natives of the islands adjacent to Scotland can,
as a general rule, be properly called neither Catholics nor heretics.
They abhor heresy by nature, but they listen to the preachers by
necessity. They go wrong in matters of faith through ignorance,
caused by the want of priests to instruct them in their religion.
If a Catholic priest conies to their island, they call him by the name
of the tonsured one, and show much greater veneration and affection
for him than for the preachers. They sign their foreheads with the
sign of the holy cross. They invoke the saints, recite litanies, and
use holy water. They themselves baptise their own children when
the ministers make any difficulty as to administrating that sacra
ment, on the pretence that it is not essential for eternal salvation."
Rescriptum : The Most Holy Father directs the appointment, as
superior of that mission, of the present Archbishop of Armagh,
who is to send labourers to these islands, and is hereby instructed to
apply to the Holy Office for the extension of his faculties.
86 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
If the preachers delayed to baptise their children,
on the ground that the rite was non-essential,
they administered the sacrament themselves.
The Congregation, understanding that the Irish
missionary priests were well able to make them-
The Hehri- selves understood by the people of the Hebrides,
dean mis- . , . , ,
sion placed proceeded to intrust the mission m these islands
tinder the . .
Ardl- to Dr Oliver Plunkett, the saintly archbishop ol
bishop of
Armagh. Armagh, who in 1681 sealed his faith with his
blood on Tower Hill. The archbishop personally
visited the Hebrides, and, in September 1671,
submitted to Propaganda a detailed report of
their religious condition.1
O
Cromwell The iron hand of Oliver Cromwell made itself
Kirk. felt by Protestants as well as Catholics in Scot
land. The General Assembly which met at Edin
burgh in July 1653 was just about to commence
business when an English officer, Colonel Cotterel,
entered the room, and demanded whether the
Assembly sat by authority of Parliament, of the
Commander-in-Chief, or of the English judges.
Hardly giving the Moderator time to reply,
Forcible Cotterel commanded the instant dissolution of
dissolution f
of the the meeting. The members were led out of the
General
G^y kv an escort of soldiers, when Cotterel again
addressed them, charging the Assembly with
1 Moran, Life of Dr Plunkett, p. 176. Archiv. Propag., Scritture
riferite, vol. i. "Eelatione dell' Isole Ebridi mandata da Mgr.
Armacano, Primate d'Ibernia, li 2 Settembre 1571, colle riflessioni
fatte sopra del procm-atore della missione di Scotia."
CONDITION OF THE COUNTRY. 87
beino- the cause of all the troubles and dissen-
O
sions in the country, and strictly forbidding it
ever to meet again, under the severest penalties.
Scotland was thus left, as has been justly ob
served, "without a kirk or a king, an army or
a navy, a Parliament or a court of justice " L of
its own — a state of things for which the preachers
and their fanatical adherents during the past
hundred years were in great measure responsible.
The moral and religious condition of the country Moral and
religions
was in truth, if we are to trust contemporary state of
" Scotland.
writers, at this time truly deplorable. According
to Lament's Diary, 2 the preachers only plunged
the people into the extreme of vice, impurity, and
degradation. " As for every sort of uncleanness
and filthiness," writes Nichol about the same time,
" they did never more abound in Scotland than
at this period. Under heaven there was not
greater falsehood, oppression, division, hatred,
pride, malice, and envy than was at this time,
and clivers and sundry years before. So that,
instead of one religion, Scotland at this time had
many. Besides Protestants and Papists, we have
now Episcopalians, Presbyterians, Covenanters,
Independents, Cross - Covenanters, Anti - Cove
nanters, Puritans, Barbarteries, Eoundheads, Old-
Horns, New-Horns, Cross-petitioners, Brownists,
1 Walsh, Hist, of Cath. Church in Scotland, p. 461.
- Diary of Mr John Lamont of Newton, 1649-1671 (Edinburgh,
1830), passim.
88 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1625-1660.
Separatists, Malignants, Sectaries, Royalists,
Quakers, and Anabaptists." Such was the com
pensation offered to the people of Scotland, after
a hundred years of dominant Protestantism, in
exchange for the one religion of their fathers.
89
CHAPTER II.
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND UNDER
CHARLES II., JAMES II., AND WILLIAM AND
MARY (1660-1702).
CHARLES II. was restored to the throne of his Restora
tion of
ancestors in the month of May 16GO. Born on chariesii.
May 29, 1630, the young prince had been, as early
as March 1645, appointed commandant of the royal
forces in the west of England, with instructions,
however, from his father to quit the kingdom
should his personal safety be endangered at the
hands of Fairfax and the Parliamentary troops.
After the fatal day of Naseby, Charles I. withdrew
to the Scilly Isles, which had remained staunch
to the defeated monarch ; and in September
1646 he crossed over to Jersey. When, in July
1648, the greater part of the English fleet re
volted in favour of the royal cause, the prince
repaired to the Hague, assumed command of the
squadron, and sailed forthwith for the English
coast. But he failed in his attempt to come to
close quarters with the hostile fleet under the
90 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
Earl of Warwick, and was compelled, for want
of provisions, to return to the coast of Holland.
Six months later, the ill-fated monarch perished
on the scaffold at Whitehall. On the eve of the
execution, ambassadors had arrived from the
Hag-iie to intercede in his favour. They brought
letters from the prince, undertaking to subscribe
to any conditions as the price of his father's life.
The offer was made in vain ; but Charles had at
least the consolation of knowing, in his last
moments, that his son had not forgotten him.1
On the death of the king, and the fall of the
English monarchy, Charles II. thought it his
wisest policy to throw himself into the arms of
the people of Scotland. He consented to all the
conditions exacted of him, promised to sign the
Solemn League and Covenant immediately on his
arrival in the country, and was crowned at Scone
on January 1, 1651. Advancing southwards with
his army, he encountered the English forces at
Worcester on September 3d. Charles was utterly
routed, and with difficulty made his escape to Paris,
where the queen -mother, Henrietta Maria, and
his brothers, the Dukes of York and Gloucester,
were then living. The relations, however, at this
time existing between Cardinal Mazarin, the lead
ing statesman of France, and Cromwell, made that
country an insecure shelter for the exiled prince ;
and he fixed his residence in turn at Cologne,
1 Lingard, Hist, of England, vol. x. pp. 421, 455.
MARRIAGE OF CHARLES II., 1662. 91
Brussels, and Breda. It was in the last city
that he received the invitation of the Parliament
of 1660 to return to England. On his birthday,
May 29, he made his triumphant entry into
London, amid the acclamations of the populace,
and peacefully resumed possession of the throne
of his fathers.1
The character of the new monarch was unfor- Character
of Charles.
tunately at once frivolous and inconstant. Already
notorious on the Continent for his irregular life,
he soon infected the English court with his licen
tious and dissipated tastes, which were but little
held in check by his marriage, in 1662, to the
Infanta Catherine of Portugal. The alliance in ffismar-
riage to
question was, it would seem, entered into without Catherine
... . -ofBra-
the usual dispensation having been obtained, as §anza-
required in the case of a Catholic marrying a
Protestant ; and a document is preserved in the
Vatican archives, in which the question is dis
cussed as to whether, and what, canonical penal
ties the queen had consequently incurred.2 Ac-
1 Lingard, Hist, of England, vol. xii. p. 1.
* Cod. Ottob. 2462, fol. 392. The following is a translation of
this curious document (the Latin text will be found in Appendix
III.) : " Ought the Queen of England to be required to ask for
the remission of the canonical penalties incurred on account of her
marriage contracted with a heretical king without Pontifical dis
pensation, and also for permission to continue in matrimonial rela
tions with her royal consort ?
It appears that she ought not to be so required, because (1) she
contracted the said marriage in perfectly good faith, persuaded by
learned men that she might lawfully do so, according to the common
opinion of many doctors — provided, that is, there be no danger of
92 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
cording to a contemporary letter of a Jesuit
named George Gray, Charles endeavoured, soon
after the arrival of Catherine at Portsmouth, to
perversion, and in places where heresy flourishes with impunity,
and the custom of seeking Papal dispensation does not exist.
" (2) Even had she sinned in contracting the marriage (a belief
which should not be too readily entertained), yet this sin is nowhere
reserved to the Pope. . . .
" (4) There are no spiritual penalties, either of excommunication
or anything similar, of which it is laid down in the Canon Law
that she herself is bound to ask for remission, even supposing her
to have committed sin.
" (5) Such an obligation would afflict beyond measure her most
Serene Majesty, who, being most pious, of very tender conscience,
and full of zeal for the Catholic faith, would be caused thereby
inconsolable grief ; and as she is commonly reported to be with
child, some untoward event might hence be greatly to be feared.
"(G) It would likewise most seriously offend his most Serene
Majesty her consort, on whose countenance and protection depends
the preservation, spread, and increase of the Catholic religion in
England, Scotland, and Ireland ; and it is much to be dreaded that,
if thus offended, he would withdraw his protection, and permit the
Parliament (which was to meet again in February) to do what it was
only prevented by his intervention from doing last year— namely,
to decree the execution of the penal laws formerly passed against
Catholics ; whence would follow innumerable confiscations of pro
perty and proscriptions of priests, with the imprisonment and
death of some : in a word, the most grievous calamities, if not the
extermination of the Catholic religion in these kingdoms.
" (7) The piety and constancy of the English, Scottish, and Irish
Catholics, in defending for a hundred years and more the authority
of the Apostolic See, for which they have endured so much im
prisonment, torture, death, plunder of their goods, and innumerable
other evils, seem to deserve that the same Holy See, the loving
mother of all the faithful, but especially of those fighting in her
cause, should not now add this affliction to the Catholics, of whom
so many have for years past suffered so much for the faith, by thus
exposing them to the anger of the king, the fury of the Parliament,
and to countless perils and great loss of souls."
It is evident from the above document that the dispensation from
the Holy See was not asked for on the princess's behalf. Whether
CHARLES II. AXD THE CATHOLICS. 93
induce her to consent to the celebration of the
marriage according to the Protestant as well as
the Catholic form. The princess, however, reso
lutely resisted this proposal, threatening to return
to Portugal sooner than agree to the ceremony
being performed by a Protestant minister ; and
the king found himself obliged to give way.1
Although the king had, of course, been brought Catholic
up by his father in accordance with the Protestant Charles n.
tenets, he was nevertheless nearer to Catholicism
than is commonly supposed. When living in
early youth with his mother in Paris, his mind
had received many ineffaceable Catholic impres
sions. Henrietta Maria was often in the habit of
visiting the Carmelite nuns in that city, accom
panied by her sons, Charles and James, for whose
Pope Alexander VII., in view of the results which had followed
the union of Henrietta Maria with the ill-fated father of Charles
II., would have been inclined to grant the favour, may perhaps be
questioned. As a matter of fact, the sister of the Portuguese
monarch did, although doubtless in good faith, become the wife of
the King of England without any such dispensation.
1 According to Father Gray's letter (printed by Foley, Records of
the English Province, 8.J., series ix. p. 278), what the "invincible
heroine," as he styles the queen, refused to do, was to forego the
Catholic ceremony altogether. She did not, as the author appears
to imply, decline to go through the Protestant form subsequently,
although Burnet declares that she was " bigoted to such a degree
that she would not say the words of matrimony." — (Hist, of his Own
Time, ed. 1724, vol. i. p. 174.) Gray distinctly states that she
consented to the marriage being " ratified by the Protestant Bishop "
[of London], who, the Earl of Sandwich (an eyewitness) adds,
"made the declaration of marriage in the Common Prayer." The
Catholic rite had already been privately solemnised by D'Aubigny.
— TRANSLATOR.
94 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
conversion to the true faith she besought the
prayers of the sisters.1 In the Declaration of
Breda, made before his restoration to the throne,
Charles had promised to guarantee liberty of con
science to all his subjects ; and there is no reason
to doubt his sincerity either in giving this pledge,
or in the attempt (albeit it proved unsuccessful)
which he made two years later to redeem it.
During his residence in Paris he had, moreover,
had frequent conferences on religious topics with
His inter- M. Olier, the saintlv and learned founder of S.
course with . ^
M. Olier. hulpice ; and these, if they had not actually won
him over to the Catholic faith, had at least dis
posed him favourably towards its adherents.2
1 Foley, Records, series xii. p. 5. The prioress at this time was
the holy Mother Margaret Mostyn, to whose prayers James II. be
lieved he owed his conversion to the Catholic faith. — TRANSLATOR.
2 M. Faillon, in his Vie de M. Olier (1873, vol. ii. p. 324 seq.),
cites Burnet, who, in his History of his Own Time, asserts posi
tively that Charles abjured Protestantism before leaving France.
M. Eapin, himself a contemporary of the king, makes the same
statement in his Hist, of England (ed. 1731, vol. xiii. p. 222), adding,
" At this time of day it is a thing of which the world has no room
to doubt." The editor of some interesting documents bearing on
this question, published in the fitudes re'ligieuses historiques ct
litte'raires, torn, v., refers, in support of the opposite view, to the
king's expressed wish in 1668 (mentioned in the text) to be recon
ciled to the Catholic Church. But as M. Faillon points out (op. cit.,
p. 347), there is nothing in this inconsistent with his having made
his abjuration ten years before ; for his public profession of Angli
canism since his accession (to say nothing of his scandalous mode of
life) would certainly have made such a reconciliation in any case
necessary. For further information on this point see Carte, Life of
Ormonde (cited in Harris, Life of Charles II., vol. ii. p. 61, note) ;
Somers Tracts, vol. viii. p. 225; Secret History of the Reigns of
Charles II. and James II., pp. 11, 18.— TRANSLATOR.
CHARLES II. AND THE CATHOLICS. 95
Even at that time it was widely rumoured in
the highest French society that Charles had
already made his submission to the Holy See ;
and in any case there can be no doubt of the
effect wrought on his impressionable nature by
the conversion of his brother James, Duke of
York, a few years afterwards. Charles, indeed,
immediately on that event, declared his own
anxiety to follow his brother's example ; but he
decided on taking counsel with Louis XIV. of
France as to the expediency of at once openly
professing himself a Catholic. The French
monarch advised extreme caution, pointing out
that the effect of such a step might probably be
the loss of his crown ; and Charles appears to
have been only too easily persuaded to keep his
religious convictions in the background.
The historian Lingard, in his relation of these
incidents, throws great doubt on the good faith
of Charles, whose real object, he adds, was proba
bly to deceive both his brother and the King of
France.1 Documents which have since come to
light, however, show that he was at least sincere
in the extremely favourable sentiments which he
professed to entertain towards the Catholic Church
and its adherents. In 1662, the same year in
which he publicly declared his desire for freedom Mission
from King
of conscience among his subjects, Charles de- Caries to
' < J PopeAlex-
spatched Sir Richard Boilings to Rome, charged «™<iervii.
1 Lingard, History of England, vol. xii. p. 204.
96 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
with the mission of obtaining, if possible, from
Alexander VII. a cardinal's hat for his kinsman,
Louis Stuart of Aubigny, Duke of Richmond and
Lennox in the peerage of Scotland.1 Stuart, who
was descended from the powerful favourite of
James VI., had embraced the ecclesiastical state
in Paris, and had for a time been mixed up
with the Jansenist party there. An intimacy,
however, which he formed with the community
of S. Sulpice happily brought him to more ortho
dox views ; and Charles, who had contracted a
close friendship with him during his residence in
Paris, procured for him on his marriage the ap
pointment of almoner to the queen. The petition
of the king to the Holy See was supported by
the queen-mother and by his own consort, both
of whom addressed letters on the subject to
Cardinals Barberini and Orsini ; 2 and Sellings
was charged to assure his Holiness, in the king's
name, that the elevation of Stuart to the purple
would be fraught with the happiest consequences
1 Charles had already, before quitting France, exerted himself
unsuccessfully to obtain Stuart's elevation to the cardinalate. The
Me'moires de M. du Ferrier (pp. 316, 317) give some interesting de
tails of the negotiations of the prince, and in particular of his
correspondence with his kinsman on the subject. The latter
alleged the impossibility of his supporting the proposed dignity on
his slender income ; and when Charles assured him that the revenues
of the English crown should be at his disposal for the purpose,
Stuart declared that he would rather die than owe his maintenance
to the benefactions of a heretical king.— TRANSLATOR.
2 Boero, Conversione alia Fede Cattolica di Carlo II. d'lnghilterra,
cC-c. (1874), pp. 123, 124.
CHARLES II. AND THE CATHOLICS. 97
for the welfare of all his Roman Catholic subjects.
The matter was remitted by the Pope to the con
sideration of a commission of cardinals, with the
result that the royal request was refused ; for
the Abbe Stuart did not enjoy at this time the
full confidence of the Holy See, nor was he
believed to have entirely shaken off his former
leanings towards Jansenism.1
The chief interest attaching to these proceed- Favour
i . . , . shown by
ings lies in the report submitted by one of the Charles
... tothe
con suitors 01 the commission of which we have Catholics.
spoken, relating to " the favours and benefits
bestowed upon the English Catholics by the
reigning monarch." '2 These were said to be as
follows : 1. He had relieved a lar^e number of
o
Catholics from the sentence of confiscation of
property pronounced on them under Cromwell.
'2. He had suspended the execution of a portion
of the penal laws — so much, namely, as punished
1 Boero, p. 131. " Primieramente il sospetto, non leggiero e mal
fondato, che il signer di Aubigny non sentisse totalmente con la
chiesa cattolica ... e si citevano varie sue lettere scritte ad
Arnaldo, con cui aveva stretta domestichezza." The reluctance of
the Pope to offend Philip of Spain, who strongly opposed the pro
motion to the purple of the nominee of a Portuguese princess, had
probably quite as much to do with the refusal of the king's petition
as had Stuart's Jansenistic proclivities. This is the more likely, as
we find after Philip's death the offer of the hat was actually made.
The Abbe, however, died (Nov. 11, 1665) a few hours after the
arrival of the Papal ablegate with the biretta. (Moreri, art. Stuart,
torn. ix. p. 597 et seq.) — TRANSLATOR.
2 According to the writer in the Etudes (torn. v. p. 202), the
articles which follow were drawn up by Charles himself for the
information of the Pope.
VOL. IV.
98 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
non-attendance at Protestant worship, in the case
of rich Catholics, by the loss of two-thirds of their
estate, and in the case of poor, by a fine of a
shilling for every instance of recusancy. 3. He
had set at liberty priests and religious who were
in prison or under sentence of death for exercis
ing their ministry. 4. He had abolished the pur
suivants, the officials charged with the duty of
O v
searching out priests in the houses of Catholics,
and had thus put an end to an intolerable oppres
sion — inasmuch as a Catholic in whose house a
priest was found was liable to confiscation of
property and banishment for life. 5. Notwith
standing other and much more advantageous
proposals, he had married a Catholic princess.1
6. He had permitted the erection of two public
chapels in London for the queen-mother and his
own consort : in the queen's chapel the choral
office was solemnly celebrated by the Benedic
tines,2 while in that of the queen -mother the
1 " Against the royal and princely families in the north of Europe,"
says Lingard (Hist, of England, vol. xii. p. 83), " he had, from some
cause or other, contracted an invincible antipathy " — which is equiv
alent to stating, as Burnet in effect does, that he was resolved that
his queen should be a Catholic. — TRANSLATOR.
2 Weldon (Chronological Notes, English Benedictine Congregation,
p. 196), in his account of the proceedings of the General Chapter of
that body in 1661, says, " King Charles II. ordered the Fathers to
nominate to him so many of their body, whom he was resolved to
maintain at London at the chapel of his queen. In this affair R. F.
Paul Robinson was very active and wonderfully acceptable to his
Majesty." Father Robinson had held the office of President of the
Congregation during the preceding four years. — TRANSLATOR.
CHARLES II. AND THE CATHOLICS. 99
functions were carried out by Capuchins. All
this was the cause of great consolation to the
Catholics, who had free access to the divine
service in the royal chapels. 7. He had, imme
diately on ascending the throne, caused liberal
alms to be bestowed on the English nuns living
in Flanders, especially those domiciled at Ghent ;
and even during his exile in Holland he had sent
to the latter sixteen hundred scudi, in earnest of
his goodwill towards them. 8. He had given
the Ghent nuns permission to build a convent
at Dunkirk,1 and to this he himself contributed
twelve thousand scudi. 9. He had repeatedly
received in audience priests and religious, in
particular two provincials of the Jesuits, and
had assured them of his protection. 10. He
had visited the queen's chapel, attended by his
court, had assisted at part of the high mass, and
knelt profoundly at the elevation. 11. He had
given the Catholic lords a seat and voice in the
Upper House of Parliament, a concession un
heard-of since the reign of Elizabeth. 12. The
oath of allegiance prescribed to Catholics on
1 The Benedictine convent at Ghent, from which that of Dunkirk
was founded in 1662, was itself an offshoot from the venerable house
at Brussels, the first established (under Lady Mary Percy, in 1599)
on the Continent after the Reformation. The town of Dunkirk was
sold by Charles to the French king the year after the foundation
of the new convent, but the nuns continued in possession until ex
pelled in 1 793. They then found a refuge in England, and are now
established at St Scholastica's Abbey at Teignmouth, in South
Devon. — TRANSLATOR.
..»
100 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
entering or leaving the kingdom had been
abolished. 13. Thirty thousand Catholics be
longing to the London train -bands, who had
declared themselves unable to take the oath
according to the customary form, had been
permitted to subscribe to a new formula, in
which the name of the Pope was not mentioned.
14. Several Catholics had been appointed to
positions of trust. 15. The endeavours of Par
liament at the beginning of the current year to
provide for the enforcing of the penal laws had
been opposed by the king. 16. He had deprived
the Exchequer of a considerable sum, by not per
mitting it to appropriate the forfeited two-thirds
of the estates of Catholics. 17. With regard to
the accusation that the king had prescribed to
Catholics a form of oath prejudicial to their
loyalty to the Pope, it was to be observed that
the real responsibility for the formula in question
rested with one Peter Walsh, a Franciscan friar,
who drew it up, and had it printed and subscribed
to by a number of his religious brethren ; whilst
a Dominican bishop and others had presented it
to the king with the assurance that Catholics
might lawfully take it.1
1 The above articles of the royal memorandum to the Holy See
are given by Boero (op. cit., pp. 128-131), with the exception of the
concluding passage, relating to Friar Walsh and the Dominican
Bishop. The following is the text of the passage in question in the
Vatican MS. (Cod. Ottob., 2462, fol. 494) : " Ma si risponde, che di
questo la colpa principale ha un certo P. Fra Pietro Walshe dell'
CHARLES II. AND THE HOLY SEE. 101
In order to remove from the mind of the Pope Negotia-
. tions of
any remaining: doubt as to the orthodoxy of his diaries for
t/ reunion
views, Charles caused to be presented to the Holy
See, at the same time as the above document,
another with reference to what he describes as
the "greatly longed-for union of his three king
doms of England. Scotland, and Ireland with the
o
Apostolic Koman See." The king professes him
self ready to accept all the decrees of General
Councils, including that of Trent, and the de
cisions of recent Pontiffs regarding the Jansen-
istic errors ; and he also expresses his detestation
of the "deplorable schism and heresy introduced
by Luther, Zwingle, Calvin, and other wicked
men," and the " Babylonish confusion " brought
about by the pretended Reformation. So far the
royal declaration is orthodox enough ; but there
is a suspicious note about the succeeding passage,
in which Charles reserves the right of objecting
to any future amplification of the Creed of Pius
IV.1 The king had, in truth, but an imperfect
Ordine di S. Francesco, il quale ha composta, e stampata la sudetta
formola, e sottoscritta da molti altri frati della sua religione, et un
Vescovo Dominicano et altri 1'hanno presentata al Ee, persuaden-
dogli che sia lecito ai Cattolici il pigliarlo." Regarding "Walsh, see
Moran, Spicileg. Ossoriense ; also an article by the author in the
Literar. Rundschau, 1879, pp. 140-142.
1 Boero, op. tit., pp. 133-135. " Oblatio ex parte Caroli II , Mitgiut,
Britannise Regis, pro optatissima trium suorum regnorum Anglia1,
Scotise, et Hiberniye cum Sede Apostolica Romana reunione. Ma-
jestas Regia, omnesque qui cum ipsa ad unitatem Ecclesise Catholicse
aspirant, fidei professionem a Pio IV. ex Concilio Tridentino ex-
cerptam, una cum omnibus aliis quse tarn in dicto Tridentino, quam
102 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
notion of what the Catholic religion really was,
and was very far — at least at this time — from look
ing at religious questions from a really Catholic
point of view. Notwithstanding the concessions
promised in the above document, as well as in
the four-and-twenty declarations appended to it,
respecting the erection of seminaries and religious
houses, the introduction of the Catholic liturgy,
and the holding of provincial councils, Charles
did not appear to have grasped the principle of
authority which is of the very essence of Catholi-
of cism. Pope Alexander, in his reply to the kinof,
Alexander r J
VII.
ill omnibus aliis Generalibus Conciliis unquaiu circa res fidei et
morum decreta, nee minus ea quse a duobus postremis Pontificibus
in causa Jansenii decisa sunt, acceptabunt ; reservando sibi, sicut in
Gallia et alibi alicubi, particularia Ecclesite suse particularis in qui-
busdam usu ipso stabilita jura et consuetudines : ita intelligendo,
ut in his terminis, quibus Laud dubie prudenter et considerate in
aliis Conciliis (Ecumenicis ex prtefata fidei professione continentur,
ita ut nihil quisquam, quod his non comprehendatur, nee ipsi, nee
ipsorum cuipiam ullo tempore imponi possit, vel amplius injungi ; ac
proinde vitio ipsi non vertendum, aut quasi hteresi faveret, inter-
pretandum erit, si quando suam in subjectis punctis mentem ac
sensum declaret. Atque acleo Regia Majestas ipso facto tarn ab
omnibus Protestantium, quam quorumcumque aliorum Romanse
Ecclesiae non unitorum congregationibus, eorumdemque Ecclesi-
arum communione se separat, et proecipue schisma deplorandum et
hoeresim a Luthero, Zwinglio, Calvino, Memnone, Socino, Browino,
et hujusmodi malis hominibus inductam detestatur ; quippe prre
aliis omnibus in regnis suis et provinciis experientia duce videt,
atque intelligit, qualem quantamque preetensa hujusmodi Eefor-
matio, quse tamen jure merito deformatio potius appellanda est,
calamitatem, rerum omnium perturbationem, ac Babylonicam con-
fusionem in ecclesiasticis reque ac politicis post se traxerit, usque
adeo ut tria hsec regna, et in primis Anglia communi orbi toti per-
turbatissime inquietudinis in sacris perinde ac profanis rebus the-
atrum eifectum sit."
CHURCH POLICY OF CHARLES II. 103
expressed with great clearness the reasons which
rendered inadmissible any concessions on the part
of the Holy See ; and the negotiations in conse
quence led to no practical result. The fact,
however, of the anxiety manifested by Charles
in regard to Catholic teaching, as well of his
reconciliation to the Church and reception of the
last sacraments on his deathbed at the hands
of the Benedictine Hudleston,1 is abundantly
proved by contemporary documents - - among
which we may mention letters written to Oliva,
General of the Jesuits, and to his son James
Stuart (alias de la Cloche, or Henry de Rohan),
a Jesuit novice at Rome ; and also two detailed
declarations, subscribed by the king and after
wards published by his brother and successor,
setting forth the untenableness of Protestantism
o
and the truth of the Catholic religion.2 It is
only to be regretted that Charles, entangled as
he was in the toils of his dissolute life, lacked
the moral courage to give public expression to
his real sentiments as to religious matters.
As far as externals were concerned, the king Ecciesiasti
cal policy
found no difficulty not only in accommodating of Charles.
himself to the forms of Anglican worship, but
1 Father Hudleston's autograph account of the king's last hours
is printed in Appendix IV., from a rare tract published in the reign
of his successor. — TRANSLATOR.
- Boero, op. cit., pp. 145-201. With reference to James Stuart,
the supposed natural son of Charles II., and the documents regard
ing him lately discovered in the National Library at Naples, see
Beumont in the Historischen Gorres-Gesellschaft, 1882, pp. 316-318.
104 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
also in imposing them on his Northern subjects.
The result of this policy, as regarded Scotland,
was that the ecclesiastical party which, in the
long struggle with the late king, had performed
the part of the hammer, was now transformed
into the anvil. An Act of Parliament passed in
1662 abolished the Presbyterian form of church
government, the Covenant was burnt in the
court of Holyrood Palace by the public execu-
Restora- tioner, and the Episcopalian system was restored
tion of . x
Episco- —minus, however, the liturgy and the canons.
paliamsm "^
iandC°i66-2 James Sharp, minister of Crail, who had been
deputed by the moderate party in the Kirk to
represent their interests with the king on his
return from the Continent, turned traitor to his
party, consented to the restoration of prelacy,
and, together with three other Presbyterian min
isters, was consecrated according to the Anglican
formula in Westminster Abbey.1 Sharp was ap
pointed to the archbishopric of St Andrews, and
six months later he officiated at the consecration
of six other prelates for the vacant Scottish sees.
By far the greater majority of the Scottish
1 Wilkins, Concilia, vol. iv. pp. 573, 574. Sharp was induced,
although with considerable reluctance, to submit to be privately
ordained deacon and priest previous to his consecration. With re
gard, however, to the six prelates whom he consecrated at Edin
burgh (for the sees of Dunkeld, Moray, Ross, Caithness, Brechin,
and the Isles), Burnet expressly states (Hist, of his Own Time, vol. i.
p. 142) that they were ordained neither priest nor deacon. Like
their predecessors in 1610 (see ante, vol. iii. p. 381), they proceeded
to the episcopal dignity per saltum /—TRANSLATOR.
EPISCOPALIANISM RESTORED, 1662. 105
Protestants were entirely opposed to the reintro- Feeling
among the
auction of the Episcopalian form of o-overnment, Scottish
' Protes-
which only a species of terrorism could enable to tants-
maintain its ground in the country. An edict of
the new Archbishop of Glasgow, calling on such
of the clergy as had been inducted since 1649
to apply for fresh collation to their benefices at
the hands of the bishops, was promptly followed
by the resignation of no less than three hundred
and fifty ministers — more than a third of the
entire body. These dissentients carried with
them the spirit of discontent into the remotest
villages of the kingdom. The parish churches
were deserted, and meetings for religious wor
ship in private houses or in the open fields, under
cover of night, became everywhere the common
practice. Little tolerance, however, was shown
by the Government for such proceedings. The
ex-ministers were forbidden even to reside in their
former parishes, while the parishioners were pro
hibited under the heaviest penalties from visiting
any church but their own, where they were com
pelled to attend the ministrations of the new in
cumbents.1 The royal troops were employed to
1 Sir Walter Scott, writing in the Quarterly Review (vol. xviii. p.
525), cites from Kirkton some strange stones of the affronts and in
dignities offered to the "curates" (as they were called) who had
replaced the former parish ministers. Every sort of obstacle was
placed in the way of their ministrations : the church doors were
barricaded, the clappers of the bells stolen, and the unfortunate in
cumbent was frequently saluted by his flock with volleys of stones.
On one occasion a box full of ants was emptied into the curate's
106 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
exact with unrelenting severity the fines incurred
by those who violated these injunctions — a sever
ity which was increased rather than diminished
by the erection, at the instance of Sharp, of a
court of commission, in which the chief power
was wielded by the State prelates. Driven to
Rising of desperation, the Covenanters, headed by their
iianters. preachers, broke out into open rebellion, which
was mercilessly suppressed by the Government.
A number of the insurgents were killed in the field,
and some sixty more were executed in Edinburgh
and various provincial towns. The prisons were
thronged with the unfortunate Covenanters, many
of whom were afterwards shipped off to the Bar-
badoes as slaves. An express Act of Parliament
was passed in 1670 against conventicles, and, in
particular, meetings for open-air worship. Those
officiating at such gatherings were to be punished
with death, while their hearers were liable to
fines of crushing severity, amounting in some
cases to as much as five thousand marks.1
unpopu- The chief responsibility for these drastic mea-
larity of J
sharbish°P sures' and the popular excitement which they
occasioned, was attributed to Archbishop Sharp,
who was in consequence singled out for general
execration as the author of the persecution of
the unfortunate Covenanters. A fanatic preacher
boots. According to Kirkton, " some profane people " thought that
if they committed sin overnight, insulting a curate next morning
was sufficient testimony of their repentance. — TRANSLATOR.
1 Acts o/Parl. of Scotl., vol. viii. pp. 9, 10.
MURDER OF ARCHBISHOP SHARP. 107
named Mitchell professed himself inspired from
heaven to end the life of the tyrant ; and in July
1668 he fired a pistol at the primate while seated
in his coach in the streets of Edinburgh. The
bullet missed its aim, lodging in the arm of the
Bishop of Orkney, who sat beside the arch
bishop ; and Sharp thus escaped with life, only,
however, to fall a victim to his enemies some
years afterwards. On May 3, 1679, he was
waylaid by nine desperadoes in a lonely spot
near St Andrews, dragged from his coach in
spite of the prayers and cries of his daughter,
and brutally murdered. The assassins, so far Murder of
from flying from justice, calmly retired to a Mays',
neighbouring cottage, where they devoted several
hours to prayer and thanksgiving for the divine
assistance which had enabled them to execute
vengeance on the enemy of the saints.1 The
natural result of this atrocious crime was an im
mediate increase in the severities exercised by the
Government against the dissentient ministers and
their adherents. Graham of Claverhouse, after
wards Viscount Dundee, was commissioned to
1 The tragical end of the primate must not lead us to suppose that
he had any genuine claim to the title of saint and martyr, which has
been freely bestowed upon him by a section of his biographers. Few
men, in truth, were ever cast in less heroic mould, or possessed less
of the stuff which goes to make martyrs. Much light is thrown on
his real character by the " Unpublished Notices of James Sharp,"
printed in a recent number of the Scottish Review (July 1884). The
verdict of the writer is a severe one, but few, we think, will dispute
its justice. — TRANSLATOR.
108 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
disperse the conventicles, and scatter the Cove
nanters, who had again taken the field in con
siderable numbers. At Bothwell, in June 1679,
they were defeated and put to rout by the royal
forces. Several of the ministers were executed,
and a great number of the insurgents were
thrown into prison or shipped off to the Amer
ican plantations. Meanwhile the more fanatical
of the Covenanters had united into a new sect,
The Cam- known as Cameronians, from their leader, a sedi-
eronians.
tious preacher named Richard Cameron. Cameron,
Cargill, and their followers taught open rebellion
against the Government, and published a solemn
sentence of excommunication against the king,
the Duke of York, and the chief ministers of
State. The new sect was proceeded against by
the authorities with ruthless severity : the leaders
were hanged, and many persons of both sexes
were likewise punished with death or transpor
tation.1 It was not until the arrival in Scotland
of the Duke of York, who had quitted England
in consequence of the violent feeling that pre
vailed there in connection with his right of sue-
o
cession to the throne, that the harsh measures
against the Cameronians were relaxed, and he
succeeded in procuring some measure of toler-
1 For some account of the extraordinary excesses of the Camer
onians, see Law's Memorials, pp. 152-159 ; and the attempted apol
ogies for them put forward by "VVodrow, Hist, of the Sufferings of
the Church of Scotland (ed. 1829), vol. iii. pp. 123-140, 202-232,
274-287.
DENUNCIATION OF CATHOLICS. 109
ation for dissentients from the religion of the
State.1
As to the Scottish Catholics, they would appear condition
to have enioyed little more indulgence under the Scottish
J. J . Catholics.
restored episcopate than they had previously done
at the hands of the Presbyterians. The fact of
the students of the College of Edinburgh being
permitted to publicly burn the Pope in effigy as
an intentional outrage on the Catholic Duke of
York, is a sufficient index to the kind of treat
ment which Catholics were likely to meet with
at this time from their Protestant countrymen.2
On October 30, 1661, James Chambers, com- catholics
missioner for the Presbytery of Aberdeen, laid to the L
Privy
before the Privy Council the result of the diligent Council.
inquiry recently made by that body for " Papists
and seminary priests " within the bounds of their
jurisdiction. Many of the names on the list
handed in by Chambers are the same as those
which we have already met with in the reign
of Charles I. in connection with similar charges.
1 Fouiitainhall's Decisions, passim. Chambers, Domestic Annals,
vol. ii. p. 404.
2 This was on Christmas Day 1680, only two months after the
arrival of James at Holyrood. The effigy of the Pope, we are told,
was a rude statue of timber, with a painted face, a grey periwig,
and a triple crown ; in the hands a cross, a candle, and a piece of
money. The students, having diverted the attention of the authori
ties by organising another procession from the Castle Hill, mean
while proceeded themselves to march up High Street. They set down
the figure (which was clothed in a calico gown, and seated in a chair)
in the middle of the street, and set fire to it, causing the gunpowder
inside the body to explode and blow it to pieces. — TRANSLATOR.
110 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
Among them we find the Marchioness of Huntly
and her children, Viscount Frendraught with his
family, the lairds of Gicht, Craig, Balgownie, and
Pitfodels, together with many others, including
the lairds of Drum, Auchindoir, Monaltrie, Tullos,
and Murefield, and likewise several priests. The
Council is besought to take rigorous measures
against these delinquents, who are charged with
" the overthrow of religion, disturbance of Church
and State, and the seducing of many poor souls."
Shortly afterwards we find the Council dealing
with John Inglis and William Brown, who had
been apprehended and lodged in the Tolbooth
of Edinburgh as " trafficking Papists." Inglis,
who was also charged with circulating Popish
books, resolutely refused to reveal the names of
such priests as he knew to be within the realm,
and declared, moreover, that he would not abandon
his own religious profession. Both culprits were
sentenced to be banished.1 The case of Thomas
Seaton, who, after a lifelong adherence to the
Protestant forms, died in January 1665, a " Cath
olic Roman," :| is, as has been truly observed,3
only one of the too numerous cases in which
" intolerance produced one of its natural fruits,
dissimulation."
Severe measures were taken in the month of
1 Privy Council Records, Chambers, op. cit., vol. ii. p. 284.
2 Lament's Diary, p. 176 ; Jan. 9, 1665.
3 Chambers, p. 301.
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST CATHOLICS. Ill
August 1671, against several Catholic families in Proceed
ings against
the north of Scotland, including the Gordons of catholics
in the
Carmellie and Littlemill, and the Grants of Ballin- north-
dalloch, all of whom were charged with harbouring
priests and attending at mass. In February of
the following year the Council had before it the
case of the Countess of Traquhair, who, it was The Count
ess of
stated, " being Popishly affected, doth keep in Traquhair.
family with her her son, the Earl of Traquhair,
and endeavours to educate him in the Popish
profession, and for that effect doth keep Irving, a
priest, to instruct him therein." Messengers-at-
arms were ordered to apprehend the Countess, or,
if that were not feasible, to summon her at the
Cross in Edinburgh, to appear with her son
before the Council, that they might provide for
his " education and breeding, conform to Act of
Parliament." Lady Traquhair appeared accord
ingly eight days later, and received orders from
the Council " to send her son to Glasgow, and
cause deliver him to Mr Gilbert Burnet, Professor
of Divinity, to be educated and bred at the
College of Glasgow, in the company of the said
Mr Gilbert, at the sight and by the advice of the
Archbishop of Glasgow." It was further expressly
ordered that the young earl was to have none
but Protestant attendants. Wauchope, younger Wauchope
of Niddry, and Lord Semple were on the same and Lor!?
i 11 i Semple.
day commanded to produce their children, " in
order to their education with some Protestant
112 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
friend." Lord Semple was moreover summoned
to answer for having sent his eldest son abroad
against the orders of the Council; while Wauchope
was directed to give up his eldest son to the
custody of his father, the parents being forbidden
to communicate with their child except in presence
of his Protestant tutor. We find Lord Semple a
little later imprisoned in Edinburgh Castle for the.
offence above mentioned, and only liberated on
giving bail to the amount of ten thousand marks,
and engaging to have his third son educated at
Glasgow. The training of the youth does not ap
pear to have been a success ; for six years later
Lady Semple (her husband being dead) com
plained to the Council that her son, " through the
general humour and corruption of the place, has
been so seduced and poisoned with bad principles
anent his Majesty's government and laws, as may
not only hazard his small fortune, but render his
loyalty altogether suspect."
Education It is worthy of remark, that during; the period
of Catholic „ . . .
children by oi which we are now treating, while many of the
Protes- . . J
tants. provisions of the penal statutes were allowed to
remain inactive, the odious practice of separating
children from their parents for religious reasons
continued, as in the instances just quoted, to be
rigorously enforced. Winster, the prefect of the
Scottish mission, in his report to Propaganda,
dated December 19, 1668, cites as a notable
example the case of the young Marquis of Huntly,
ABERDEENSHIRE CATHOLICS. 113
who had been educated under the immediate su
pervision of the Archbishop of Glasgow. Huntly
had in spite of this remained firm in the Catho
lic faith ; but on the other hand, the Marquis of
Douglas, and the Earls of Errol, Winton, Suther
land, and Caithness had not only themselves
abandoned their religion, but had involved many
others in their fall.1
Aberdeen and the surrounding district appear Catholics
i i ,...,, ... in Aber-
to nave been distinguished at this time as a special <ieensinre.
stronghold of the adherents to the old faith, and
we find the sheriffs both of Aberdeenshire and
1 Archiv. Propag. Scotia, Scritture riferite, 1668. Ex relations
Alexanclri Vinsteri. "The second obstacle is the unjust and tyran
nical law by which the children of Catholics (especially of nobles),
are torn from their parents in early youth, are handed over to
heretical teachers to be instructed in heresy and hatred of the
Catholic religion, and are brought up in heretical schools or
academies. And the special feature of this law, as distinct from
others, is that it is directed not so much against adults as against
innocent children, nor is it, like some others, temporarily suspended,
but is continually being put in execution ; as was lately experienced
by a youth of the highest nobility, the Marquis of Huntly, who
was given a heretical teacher, and not only compelled to attend a
heretical academy, but (in order that he might imbibe heresy the
more easily), was forced to take his meals daily at the table of the
pseudo-archbishop, a man cunning and apt to deceive ; until after
a year of captivity, he came forth, by the divine assistance, with his
faith unimpaired. The same process (but unhappily with a very
different result), was gone through some years ago in the case of
the noble young Marquis of Douglas and the Earls of Errol, Winton,
Sutherland, Caithness, and several others, who, having been infected
with heresy from their tender years, persevered in it together with
their families, and by their example gave a handle for perversion
to their friends, relations, vassals, and dependants ; for the defec
tion of a single powerful noble always brings with it the fall of
very many besides himself."
VOL. IV.
114 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
Banff frequently urged to do their utmost to put
down Popery within the limits of their jurisdic
tion. All who either said or heard mass were to
be summoned for their crimes, excommunicated,
escheated, and their goods handed over to the
universities ; and every effort was to be used
for the " suppressing and rooting out of Popery
Irving of and Quakerism." In August 1670, Francis Irving,
brother to the laird of Drum, and a convert to
Catholicism, was before the Council on the usual
charges — namely, harbouring priests and hearing
mass. It was even said that under his protection
a priest had been bold enough to hold a public
disputation in defence of his religion — a thing
unknown since the days of Quintin Kennedy and
John Knox.1
Mission- At the time of the Restoration there was a
Scotland considerable number of zealous and devoted clergy
at the . ...
Restora- labouring on the mission in Scotland. Of them
tion.
the majority appear to have been members of
religious orders — a circumstance easily explained
when we remember the advantages which these
bodies enjoyed in virtue of their corporate organ
isation, and also the fact that many of the regular
1 This is hardly correct. Nicol Burne had at a much later date
been deprived of his professorship, and banished in consequence of
his public defence of the Catholic doctrines against the ministers
(see ante, vol. iii. p. 335) ; and we know from contemporary evi
dence (ibid., p. 338, note) that Father Gordon had frequently and
publicly disputed with the preachers in the actual presence of
James VI. and his court. — TRANSLATOR.
WINSTER PKEFECT OF THE MISSION. 115
missionaries were not natives of the country. We
must not, however, omit to record the name of
the excellent prefect of the mission, Alexander
Winster (or Dunbar). A native of Morayshire, he winster
entered the Scotch College at Rome in 1651, was °
ordained priest six years later, and after studying
for another year at Paris, entered on the Scottish
mission in 1658. On the death of Ballantyne, the
names of three candidates were proposed for the
vacant office of prefect. In the information re
ceived by the Cardinals of Propaganda, Winster
was represented as being especially careful in
sending to Rome reports as to the progress of the
missions ; and on this ground, as well as on account
of his having been already unanimously chosen
vice - prefect, he was appointed successor to Appointed
Ballantyne in June 1662.1 In 1668 he came to th?nl°f
Paris on affairs connected with the mission, and "'
did not return to Scotland until four years later.
After the accession of James II., Winster appears
to have spent some time at the Court of that
monarch, by whom he was held in the highest
esteem.2 On the outbreak of the Revolution of
*Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 134, 22 Jnnii 1662. " Alexandra
Winstero 6 sette anni, che vi sta con grandissimo utile di quei
popoli e soddisfattione dei suoi compagni, diligentissimo nello
scrivere e dar relationi, et e stato lasciato per V. Prefetto dal me-
desimo Bannatino. . . . S. C. pensatis omnibus censuit, Vinsterum
in munere Prsefecti esse subrogandum."
2 Brady, Episcopal Succession, vol. iii. p. 456. Bishop Leyburne,
the English vicar-apostolic, wrote to Propaganda on February 19
1686, strongly recommending as bishop for Scotland "the superior
116 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
1688 he took refuge in Edinburgh Castle, which
was held for a time by the Duke of Gordon in the
king's name ; and at the capitulation of the
castle he was permitted to go north unmolested.
By his prudent and circumspect conduct he was
able to evade all the efforts made by the ministers
and soldiers to apprehend him, and he died in
peace in 1708, in his eighty-third year.1
Wmster's Wmster despatched from Paris, on December
report to
Rome, De- iQ 1668, a detailed report to Propaganda on the
cember
1668. condition of the Church in Scotland. It will be
of interest to give some account of the contents of
this document, which is one of the most important
in the archives of the Congregation, as regards
the Scottish mission.
The prefect in the first place sets forth that
having found it impossible, owing to the multi
farious duties of his office, to prepare while in
Scotland a report of the religious state of that
country, he intends to devote his leisure time in
Paris to the fulfilment of the task. He deems
this circumstance a fortunate one, inasmuch as
the transmission of letters through Scotland is
attended with the greatest difficulties, and all
communications on Catholic affairs are forbidden
of that mission, who is known to the king, and much esteemed by
his Majesty, and by the noble Catholics of this realm. He (Mr
Winster) passed the winter in this Court, with his patron, the Duke
of Gordon. . . . His mode of life was always most exemplary, and
his conduct irreproachable."
1 Gordon, Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 625.
REPORT OF WINSTKR, 1668. 117
by the law.1 In drawing up his report, Winster
made use of the detailed list of questions which is&° '
were forwarded to every missionary by Propa
ganda. Among the Catholic nobles, he says, the
Marquis of Huntly occupies the first place. The
practice of the Catholic religion is prohibited in
Scotland by the law of the land, and the Cath
olics, in consequence, hold their services in private
houses, where sermons are preached and the sac
raments are administered : in the Highlands, how-
O '
ever, this is done with much greater freedom.
In the divine service the Roman rite is univer
sally observed, except with regard to the calendar ; The caien-
for in order to avoid confusion, the Catholics, with in Scot-
the majority of the nation, follow the old reckon
ing. No errors in matters of faith are prevalent
amongst them. The practice, which was forced
upon them some ten years ago, of being present
at the Protestant services, in order to evade the
penalties incurred by non-attendance at the Pres
byterian church, has through the efforts of the
missionaries been altogether abandoned.2 Not a
1 Archiv. Propag. Scotia, Scritt. rifer. I. Relatio Winsteri. 6°.
" Per Britanniam neque a cursoribus neque ab amicis secure defer-
untur literse, sive relationes, quales S. Congr10- merito a missionariis
exigit, prtesertim cum quaestionibus de nominibus, numero et quali-
tate catholicorum sacerdotum et religiosorum et sirailibus, quse
quum sub gravissimis poenis prohibeantur summse imprudentise
reputatur, ea cum tanto religionis periculo scriptis committere."
2 Ibid., No. 18. "Ab omni errore in fide . . . immunes sunt
Catholici. Solebant quidern ante decem annos aliqui hsereticorum
condones publicas frequentare, ut poenas non frequentantibus a
land.
118 CATHOLIC CHUECH IX SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
waster's single church is at the disposal of the Catholics ;
Report,
1668. but mass is said and sermons are preached either
in private dwellings, or in some cases, as in the
Highlands and the Hebrides, in the open fields.
There are in Scotland altogether some twelve hun-
o
dred churches, all of which are in the hands of the
Protestants. There is no Catholic bishop in the
country ; consequently the Catholics, excepting
such as live in foreign countries, are deprived of
Means of the sacrament of confirmation.1 The secular and
subsistence
regular clergy perform their duties with fidelity ;
nor do they receive any stipend in return for their
labours in the exercise of their ministry. For as
the Catholics, equally with the Protestants, are
compelled to contribute to support the preachers,
it has been the custom, ever since the Beforma-
tion, that they should not be doubly burdened.
The secular priests have no fixed place of resi
dence : they are obliged to be constantly moving
from place to place, both on account of the per
secution, and also in order to minister to their
widely scattered flocks, especially to the sick.2
legibus impositas evitarent, sed jam missionariorum adhortationibus
a damnabili illo cum heereticis commercio abstinent."
1 Eelatio Winsteri, No. 40. " Nullus est in Scotia Episcopus
Catholicus, unde Catholici omnes nostrates Sacramento Confirma-
tionis privantur, iis solum exceptis, qui ad catholicas nationes se
conferunt."
2 Ibid., No. 62. " Nee sfeculares in certo loco ita consistunt, aut
consistere possunt, quin saepe loca subinde nrutare necesse sit, ut
Catholicis proesertim infirmis bine inde dispei-sis et non raro longe
dissitis concurrant."
REPORT OF WINSTER, 1668. 119
The fathers of the Society of Jesus had recently winter's
, Keport,
received, through the Marchioness of Huntly, the lees,
sura of two thousand scudi, and Louis XIII. had
bestowed an alms of twenty thousand livres on
the Scottish mission. Nevertheless the clergy
were exceedingly poor. Winster, after mention
ing the priests then living in Scotland, goes on to
specify a number of others who were residing
abroad, being, as he observes, driven thereto by
sheer necessity, since they had no private means,
and no one to befriend them at home. The wear
ing of the ecclesiastical dress was strictly forbidden,
and all the priests went about in the disguise of lay
men. In the Lowland districts clerical vocations Vocations
to the
had by no means died out, as was shown by the priesthood.
fact that in 1668 the prefect sent five youths to
the Scotch College at Paris ; but in the High
lands not one had for a long period embraced the
ecclesiastical state, and all efforts to procure stu
dents were frustrated by the opposition of their
parents. While the Protestants were in posses
sion of the wThole of the educational establish
ments, the Catholics had not a single school in
the Lowlands ; in the Highlands they had suc
ceeded in establishing one or two, under the pro
tection of the Macdonalds ; 1 but it was with the
1 In 1675 there were two schools in the Highlands — one at Glen
garry, the other in the island of Barra (see Gordon, Scotichronicon,
vol. iv. p. xi). Propaganda would appear to have been disposed at
first to insist on Catholic children being sent to these schools from
all parts of Scotland — a condition which Winster soon convinced
120 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
winster's greatest difficulty that teachers could be got to
1668. ' discharge the duties of their office in those remote
o
districts. There were no convents of nuns in the
whole of Scotland.1
obstacles 'Wiiister next proceeds to enumerate the ob-
of the mis- stacles which, according to his judgment, stood in
the way of the progress of the Scottish mission.
Foremost among these, he says, is of course the
severity of the penal laws, which forbid the clergy
to celebrate, and the laity to assist at, mass, under
The penal pain of exile, confiscation of property, and death.
statutes. L
The fact that these statutes are not enforced in
all their rigour is to be ascribed only to the good
will of individual officials ; for the Parliament is
constantly increasing their severity, and the
pseudo-bishops and preachers, to whom the people
submit not out of conviction but from fear of
punishment, as soon as they perceive the least
sign of relenting towards the Catholics, at once
press for the exaction of the statutory penalties.
Enforced The second and third obstacles are those enact-
Protestant
education, ments which compel the children of Catholics to
them was perfectly impracticable, assuring the cardinals that Cath
olic parents in Scotland would as soon send their children to school
in Jamaica as to the island of Barra. — TRANSLATOR.
1 Eelatio Winsteri, No. 82. " In tota Scotia nullae sunt Moni-
ales, nee per leges ab hseresis principle contra eas latas esse pos-
sunt." More than a century and a half was to elapse from the
writing of these words before a community of religious women was
again to find a home in Scotland. The Ursulines of Jesus entered
on possession of St Margaret's Convent, Edinburgh, in December
1834.— TRANSLATOR.
REPORT OF WIXSTER, 1668. 121
be educated in Protestantism, and exclude Cath- winter's
olics from every kind of office and dignity. Among i6t>8.
the judges, lawyers, and procurators of the king- ot*c5<T
dom there was not at this time to be found a civil offices.
single Catholic. Winster attributes the deplor
able condition of the Scottish Catholics in great
measure to the high-handed proceedings of the
English Parliament. The refusal on the part of
that body to carry out the policy of toleration
desired by the king had had the effect of greatly
strengthening the hands of the state-bishops in
Scotland, who tyrannised alike over Presbyterians
and Catholics. The only hope for a better state
of things appeared to be in the personal goodwill
of the king, who was unwilling to permit the en
forcement of the penal statutes. To the difficul
ties already specified must be added the want of
missionaries, and the defective condition of the want of
Scotch Colleges at Paris, Douai, Madrid, and the foreign
& m > colleges.
Rome, in all of which there was pressing need of
reform. Winster makes especial complaint of the
college at Madrid, which, notwithstanding its
abundant means, had up to that time educated
only five priests ; l and he remarks of all these
seminaries, that they had produced three times as
many regular as secular priests for the Scottish
mission.2 The concluding portion of the report
1 See ante, p. 58.
2 Relatio Winsteri. " Constat triple plures sacerdotes regulares
quam sseculares ex iis semper prodiisse, et jam vivunt saltern
122 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
winster's contains various petitions for the removal of the
Report,
great disadvantages under which the mission was
labouring, special reference being made to the
need of a thorough training of the missionaries,
and of a pecuniary subsidy in their support.
Winster also submits to the Congregation a num
ber of questions referring to matrimonial rights,
the exercise of church patronage in favour of the
preachers, the payment of tithes, and other mat
ters. Unfortunately the Acts of Propaganda
afford no information as to the answers given to
o
these queries.
o?5Sheer The whole tenor of tnis important document, of
winder, which we have given only the merest outlines,
proves Winster to have been a man of exceptional
ability, animated with truly apostolic zeal, watch
ing over his extensive field of missionary labour
with untiring vigilance, and intent on ameliorat
ing its condition by every means in his power.
We meet with his name again in the Acts of Pro
paganda of the year 1676, when the Congrega
tion appears to have consulted him as to the dis
tribution of missionaries in different parts of Scot
land, and also as to the advisability of sending
thither an Irish bishop to administer confirmation.
Winster does not seem to have considered the
latter scheme as practicable under existing cir
cumstances, which would make it impossible for
duplo plures regulares quain sacerdotes steculares, qui ex iis
prodierunt."
SUPERIORS OF THE MISSION, 1668-1680. 123
the prelate to travel about Scotland except at
very considerable personal risk.1
During Winster's prolonged residence in Paris John
Walker,
the office of superior of the Scottish mission was pro tem.
superior
filled by Father John Walker, also a convert to ^«n
the Catholic religion, which he had embraced in
Portugal, while living in that country in the
capacity of secretary to Lord Lindsay. He
entered the Scotch College at Rome in 1643,
and came on the mission in Scotland seven years
later. Among the conversions wrought through
his means was that of Mr Irvine of Drum,2 with
whom Father Walker had many conferences on
religious matters ; and these he afterwards pub
lished, under the title of The Presbytery's Trial,
at Paris, whither he retired for a time in 1655,
to avoid the rancorous zeal of the Presbyterian
ministers. Soon after the return of Winster to
Scotland, and his reassumption of the prefectship,
Father Walker went to reside in Borne, where he
died in 1679, and was buried in the church of
Propaganda.3 In 1680 the clergy elected as vice- David
&1/ Bui-net,
prefect of the mission David Burnet, another con- yice-pre-
feet, 1680.
vert to Catholicism, and also an alumnus of the
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, 1676, fol. 9. " Non stima bene d°- Pre-
fetto di chiamare in Scotia un vescovo Ibemese per fare la chresima,
stante la difficolta di condurlo per il regno con pericolo di gran
persecutione."
2 Probably the brother of the Laird of Drum — the same whom
we have already seen brought before the Privy Council in 1C70, on
the usual charges of " Popery." — TRANSLATOR.
3 Gordon, Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 623.
124 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
Scotch College at Rome. From Paris, where he
filled for a time the office of prefect of studies at
the Scotch College, Burnet sent to Propaganda
in May 1677 a detailed report of his missionary
labours during the previous seven years.1 Ten
years later he received the appointment of prin
cipal chaplain at the Chapel Royal, Holyrood ;
but on the outbreak of the Revolution he quit
ted Edinburgh, not without risk of his life, and
repaired to France, whence he afterwards de
spatched to Propaganda another report, dated
from Dunkirk, on the condition of the Scottish
Catholics.2 At the special desire of King James,
Burnet returned to Scotland to labour on the
mission, and he died there in 1696. We find at
scotch this period a number of Scottish names among1
professors fc>
at Padua, the professors at the celebrated seminary at
Padua, under Cardinal Barberigo. The chair of
theology was filled in 1685 by John Paul Jameson,
a convert priest from the diocese of Aberdeen,
and of some reputation as a historical student ; 3
while the professor of Greek about the same time
was Robert Strachan, the son of a Presbyterian
minister. He had become a Catholic while study-
1 Archiv. Propag. Scotia, Scritture riferite I.
2 Ibid., Acta 1692, fol. 18. Relationes Em"* Cardinalis d'Estree.
" David Burnet, sacerdote secolare missionario, e vice prefetto delle
missioni di Scotia, scrivendo da Doncherche alii 16 Settembre
dell' anno passato, dk conto alle EE. VV delle missioni."
3 See Nicolson, The Scottish Historical Library (1736), pp. 29, 64,
74. Robertson, Statiita Ecdesice Scot., Preface, p. clxvii, note.
SUFFERINGS OF THE MISSIONARIES. 125
ing at Aberdeen University, and before going to
Padua had spent several years at the Scotch
College in Rome, where he was ordained priest
in 1685.1 Father William Leslie had a few years
previously occupied the theological chair at Padua ;
but going to Germany on the invitation of his
kinsman, General Count Leslie, he rapidly ad- Bishop
vanced in honour and dignity, and was finally, Layba°h.
in 1718, appointed Prince -Bishop of Lay bach,
Metropolitan of Carniola, and Prince of the Holy
Roman Empire. He died in 1727, bequeathing
among other legacies a thousand florins to the
Scotch College at Rome.2
The majority of the missionaries in Scotland at Sufferings
this period found themselves, of course, exposed sionaries's
r a* fv.Q pu
at the Re-
, , ill- i aL ine "
to the greatest hardships and dangers at the out- volution
break of the Revolution which drove James II.
from the throne. Of Father Robert Davidson,
who, like so many others, was thrown into prison
in 1689, we are told that he was not allowed by
the Government so much as a loaf of bread for
his subsistence.3 He was banished for life in
1 Gordon, op. cit., p. 617.
2 Ibid., p. 576. Gams, Series Episcoporum Ecclesice Catholicce, p.
283. Bishop Leslie also left a thousand crowns to the Scottish
mission. In the Historical Records of the Family of Leslie, p. 303
et seq., are given some interesting letters from the prelate to his
relatives in Scotland. In 1625, he sent to his brother, the laird of
Warthill, his portrait and diploma from Padua University, which
are still preserved in the family. Leslie's mother was great-niece
to the celebrated Bishop Elphinstone of Aberdeen. — TRANSLATOR.
3 Gordon, Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 540.
126 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
1693, but, contriving to return to Scotland, was
again apprehended and sent to Ireland, whence
he came back once more, and continued to labour
on the mission until his death in 1711. James
Nicol was another priest imprisoned at the same
time, as was also Robert Munro, whose fate was,
perhaps, harder than that of any of his contem
poraries. Banished from Scotland in 1696, he
was again thrown into prison in Flanders on a
charge of rebellion against King William. Soon
after his release he returned to the Scottish mis
sion, where he laboured for several years ; but in
1704 he was once more apprehended, confined in
the depth of winter, and while suffering from
fever, in a damp dungeon in Glengarry Castle,
without even a handful of straw to lie upon, or
so much as a glass of water to relieve his burning
thirst, the result being that at the end of two
days he expired.1 Alexander Christie, and George,
John, and Walter Innes were among others of the
secular clergy who, after undergoing, often more
than once, imprisonment and banishment, re
turned with unwearied zeal to resume their apos
tolic labours in their native country.2
Scottish Among these devoted missionaries we continue
Jesuits.
to find recorded the names of many members of
the Society of Jesus. A letter written in 1683
to Father Oliva, the General, gives some details
with regard to John Ogilvie, who had, it appears,
1 Gordon, Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 585. 2 Ibid., pp. 535, 565, 566.
SCOTCH PRIESTS ON THE MISSION. 127
been long in prison in London, under Cromwell,
and had afterwards been reduced almost to star
vation in Ireland, where he was compelled " to
lurk in the mountains and caverns." He died in
1673 at the seat of the noble family of Winton,
near Edinburgh.1 John Gordon entered the
Society at Tournai, in 1660, and was afterwards
nominated superior of the Jesuit missionaries in
Scotland.2 The same office was held in 1679 by
James Forbes, who seven years later was ap
pointed, together with Thomas Patterson, chap
lain to James II. at Holyrood.3 John Seton, who
in 1686 had opened a new mission in Perthshire,
was imprisoned at the Revolution, and not re
leased until nearly five years later. The effect of
his long confinement was such that he died in
1694, a few months after his discharge.4 Stephen
Maxwell, an alumnus of Douai, and sometime
professor of philosophy at Carcasson, was also
among the sufferers by the Revolution, being
confined for several years in Blackness Castle.
He was afterwards superior of his brethren on
the Scottish mission, and was held in particular
esteem by Bishop Gordon, the second vicar-
apostolic of Scotland. He died in 1713.5
Resuming now the course of our narrative, we
find the Congregation of Propaganda resolving,
in the year 1677, to appoint a visitor to report
1 Oliver, Collections S.J., p. 35. 2 Ibid., p. 23.
3 Ibid., p. 21. 4 Ibid., p. 38. * Ibid., p. 32.
128 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
Alexander on the state of religion in Scotland. The choice
appointed fell on Alexander Leslie, brother of the Scotch
vi.sitor to
the Scot- agent in Rome, for whose guidance detailed in-
tisli mis
sion, 1677. structions were drawn up, embodying no less
than a hundred and four questions.1 The visitor
accordingly travelled, in the execution of his mis
sion, through the whole of Scotland, not without
great difficulty and numberless hardships ; and in
1681 forwarded to the Congregation the result of
Number of his inquiries. According to his report, the num-
communi-
cants. ber of communicants in the country amounted to
fourteen thousand, of whom twelve thousand be
longed to the Highlands and Islands — a state of
things which the visitor attributed to the remote
ness of those districts from the seat of govern
ment, and the consequent impossibility of strictly
enforcing the penal laws within their limits. The
religious condition of the Lowlands was propor-
Paticity of tionately unsatisfactory, the small number of com-
Catholics J . .
in the mumcants in that region being thus distributed :
Lowlands.
in Galloway, 550 ; in Glasgow and the neighbour
hood, 50; in Forfarshire, 72; in Aberdeenshire, 450;
in Banffshire, 1000 ; and in Morayshire, 28. The
report commends the zeal and fidelity both of
clergy and laity, adding, however, that few of
the faithful, with the best will in the world, have
1 Archiv. Propag. Scotia, Scritture riferite I. " Instruttione per
il Visitatore di Scotia, 1677." Ibid., Acta, 1677, fol. 66. " Dominum
Alexandrum Leslaeum in visitatorem elegit, eique mandavit mitti
scuta centum pro una vice tantum cum instructione facienda
secretario."
LESLIE'S VISITATION, 1677. 129
the chance of hearing mass more than thrice in
the year, in consequence of the necessity which
compels the clergy to be constantly travelling
from one place to another. The visitor deems
some change in the regulations affecting the mis
sions absolutely necessary, and recommends among
other measures the following1 : 1. The allotment Kecom-
P P j i p • i .1 •• •• naendations
oi nxed places 01 residence to the missionaries in cfthe
visitor.
the different districts, notwithstanding the opposi
tion of the regular clergy, who desire the continu
ance of the present system. 2. The grant of uni
form faculties to seculars and regulars, so that all
occasion of ill-feeling may be removed, and the
laity may not be led to suppose the secular priests
in any wray inferior to the members of religious
orders.2 3. The nomination of a general superior
for Scotland, with authority over seculars and
regulars alike 3 ; or the latter to be at least
bound to exhibit to him their faculties. 4. To
ensure an equitable distribution of the income
1 Leslie's proposals are preserved in the Vatican archives (Cod.
Ottob. 3182, fol. 23 et seq.) " Supplicationes Visitatoris Missionis
Scotite ad S. Congregationeni de Propaganda Fide, A.D. 1681, die...
Januarii." A translation of the report and accompanying petitions
will be found in Appendix V.
2 Supplicatio 2a- " Ut ad tollendas contentionum et rixarum in
Scotia radices, qua? inter Missionarios sacerdotes sseculares et
regulares oriri possint, et ut laici non faveant magis unis quam
alteris, nee existiment saeculares sacerdotes esse Societatis reject-
amina, omnium, tarn regiilarium quam srecularium, facilitates sint
uniform es."
3 Supplicatio 3a- " Ut missio Scotite habeat Superiorem Gene-
ralem, qui possit omnes tarn saeculares quam regulares continere
in officio."
VOL. IV. I
130 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
of the mission, every missionary to render a
yearly account of his receipts. 5. Inasmuch as
the Scotch colleges abroad are at present to a great
extent simply novitiates for the religious orders,
no student to be henceforth admitted to any of
them without a written testimonial from the
superior of the mission ; and their entrance to
be followed as soon as possible by the adminis
tration of the missionary oath.1 6. The mission
to receive an increased subsidy from the Holy
See. 7. Missionaries — if necessary, Irish priests,
of whom there are many in Paris ready for the
work — to be stationed not only in the Highlands
and Islands, but also in the Lowlands, even in
those districts where the number of Catholics is
small. 8. The home for superannuated Scottish
clergy at Cadome in Normandy to be, for divers
good reasons, transferred to Paris. The visitor
concludes by urgently asking the aid of the Con
gregation in the foundation of schools in the
Highlands, and by petitioning for a grant of
sacred vessels for the altar, as well as of pious
books and devotional objects.
Kesuit of The report of Father Leslie was duly considered
tion. by the Congregation, which on March 4, 1681,
issued, for the better regulation of the Scottish
mission, a number of decrees, whose substance is
1 Supplicatio 6a- " Ut statim atque Romam venerint [alumni] et
collegium ingressi fuerint, solitum sumant juramentum, unde rec-
tores collegii non tarn facile, lit solent, novitiatum faciaut collegium
pontificium."
RESULT OF LESLIE'S VISITATION. 131
given below.1 The effect of these salutary meas
ures was to inspire the missionaries with new
courage, and to instil into them more of a corpo-
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, 1681, fol. 7, March 4, 1681. "Their
Eminences, after mature deliberation, were pleased to decree as
follows : 1°, That such priests, as in the judgment of the Most Emi
nent Cardinal of Norfolk are found to be suitable, be sent to the
Scottish Mission, in order that the number of labourers in that
portion of the Lord's vineyard may be increased.
" 2°, That a visitation of the Scots Colleges be made by the same
Most Eminent Cardinal, to whom are to be consigned the decrees
of this Sacred Congregation regarding the said colleges, that he may
provide, as seems best to his prudence, for their due execution.
" 3°, That the schools erected in the Highlands and the Hebrides
continue to be supported by the Sacred Congregation.
" 4°, That the missionaries — both those now in Scotland, and
hereafter to be sent thither — be assigned each to their own province
and district, and not exercise their faculties or offices beyond the
limits marked out for them, except in cases of urgent necessity, and
then with the licence and permission of the superior for the time
being.
" 5°, That the Visitor, Mr Alexander Leslie, return as soon as
possible to the Mission, in order to carry out the wishes of the S.
Congregation according to the instructions to be drawn up and given
to him ; and that for this end there be granted to him letters, and
all the necessary faculties. With regard to the manner, time, and
plan of procedure, the Visitor is to be guided by the said Most
Eminent Cardinal of Norfolk, whose commands he is to obey, and
to whose prudent counsels he is to conform himself in every respect.
" 6°, That there be continued to the Mission the usual subsidy
from the S. Congregation of five hundred scudi, to be annually dis
tributed to the said labourers in proportion to their labours and
needs, through the superior of the Mission for the time being.
" 7°, That the Mission be permitted to transfer from the town of
Cadome in Normandy, and to establish in Paris, a home for the re
ception of aged and infirm missionaries, and also of young men, who
before proceeding to Scotland may be instructed in the duties apper
taining to the office of a missionary : for which purpose their Emi
nences are pleased to grant and confirm the continuation of the
subsidy of seventy scudi as heretofore decreed.
" 8°, That letters be written, in the name of the S. Congregation,
132 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
rate spirit than they had hitherto possessed. In
clerical April 1687, eight priests met at the residence of
(ioiif'tir6nc6
April 1687.' the Duke of Gordon, near the mouth of the river
Spey, to hold conference under the presidency of
the vice-prefect, Father Burnet. The report of
this meeting, afterwards laid before Propaganda
by Cardinal Howard, contains a number of inter
esting details. There were, it seems, only six
priests at this time in the Highlands, in spite of
which the Catholic faith was making progress.
Many Catholics were in the habit of contracting
to the most noble Marquis of Huntly, requesting him to transmit
to Paris whatever is left over of the pious legacy of Francis Irvine,
after paying out of the principal what is due in Scotland ; that the
S. Congregation may, according to the desire of the testator, dispose
of the said sum freely and securely for the benefit and advantage
of the Mission.
" The above decrees having been referred by the Secretary to the
Holy Father, his Holiness commended and approved them all, and
by his apostolic authority commanded them to be duly carried out."
Cardinal Philip Howard, whose name occurs in the above decrees
as Protector of England, was the third son of Henry Frederick
Howard, and grandson of the Earl of Arundel and Surrey. He
entered the Dominican Order at Cremona, in 1645 ; but, owing to
the opposition of his relatives, was not permitted to make his pro
fession until his vocation had been tested, by order of Pope Inno
cent X., in various ways and with great severity. He took the
vows in October 1646, and studied afterwards for four years at
Naples. In 1662 he was appointed first chaplain to Catherine,
queen to Charles II., and for twelve years he remained in England,
edifying all by his zeal and piety. In 1674 he was driven from
England by the popular clamour against Catholics, and retired to
Bornhem, where he received in the following year the news of his
elevation to the cardinalate by Clement X. The Cardinal, who died
in 1694, was greatly esteemed at the Holy See on account of his
many virtues and observant life. See Palmer's Life of Philip
Thomas Howard (1888). Cardella, Memorie Storiche, vol. vii.
CONFERENCE OF MISSIONARIES, 1687. 133
marriages in the second degree of consanguinity
and affinity ; and faculties were asked to give the
necessary dispensations. Register-books of bap
tisms, marriages, and deaths were produced and
compared, as well as lists of communicants. Special
stress was laid on the great difficulty experienced
in renewing the holy oils — one which only the ap
pointment of a bishop could remedy.1 In conse
quence of the Protestants adhering to the old cal
endar, a list of the movable feasts was drawn up
yearly by the royal chaplains, and published on the
feast of the Epiphany. Catholics who permitted
their children to be brought up as Protestants, or
who were married by the ministers, were refused
the sacraments. One of the most important points
under discussion was the proposed appointment Proposed
appoint-
of a bishop, who might fortify the faithful with j»entofa
the sacrament of confirmation,2 and represent
their interests at court. The names of Winster,
Leslie, and Burnet were suggested as suitable
candidates for the dignity. The necessity for
such an appointment was shown by the fact that
many of the clergy, in their religious instructions
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, 1687. It would appear, from an expres
sion in Cardinal Howard's report, that the holy oils had to be
brought to Scotland from London. " Circa la rinuovatione che deve
farsi ogni anno de' sagri Olii se n'e parlato nell' Assemblea e se n'6
dato incumbenza per lettera al Prefetto [then in London]. Ma dice
il procuratore che mai si rimediera a questo grand' incommodo senza
un Vescovo che possa consagrarli e distribuirli a sacerdoti."
2 " Vescovo, che consoli q'uei Cattolici col sagramento della confir-
matione."
134 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
to the people, were in the habit of omitting all
mention of the sacrament above mentioned.1
Two years previous to the holding of this con
ference, an event had occurred which greatly
affected the interests of the Scottish Catholics.
King Charles II. died on February 6, 1G85, and
Accession was succeeded by his brother James Duke of
ii., 1685. York, who had married in September 1673 a
Catholic princess, Mary Beatrix of Este,2 and was
himself a convert to the Catholic faith. Almost
immediately on his accession, the new monarch
Edicts of gave evidence of his wish to secure toleration for
F°ehrai2°n' his Catholic subjects. In two successive procla
im, 1686. mations addressed to the people of Scotland, he
promised to uphold the rights of the Established
Church, and undertook that the holders of Church
property should not be disturbed in their peace
able possession of the same. At the same time
he declared suspended by his royal authority the
penal statutes against Catholics, pronouncing him
self in favour of complete liberty of conscience for
all religious denominations.3 It would be outside
1 Acta, 1681, fol. 7, 8. Ad 15. "Responde [il visitatore Lesleo]
die il popolo lion e molto istruito circa la cresima, perche non ei
e occasione di conferirgli questo Sagramento. Anziche nelle mon-
tagne non ardiscono i sacerdoti mentovargli questo Sagramento."
a It should be noted that this marriage, which was celebrated at
Modena by an English Dominican named White, took place not
only without the necessary Papal dispensation (James was not as
yet a professed Catholic), but in defiance of the express prohibition
of the Holy See. See Strickland, (Queens of England, vol. ix. p.
39 et seq.
3 State Tracts, vol. ii. p.285. Fountainhall, Decisions,^. 1179, 1181.
THE MASS RESTORED AT HOLYROOD. 135
our scope to enter here either on the faults of
James's private life, or the errors of his public
policy ; but the tenor of his edicts as to religious
toleration undoubtedly proves him to have been
at least a century in advance of his age. During
the residence of James in Edinburgh as Duke of
York, the Catholic service had been celebrated in Restora
tion ot the
a room in the palace of Holyrood. In December gJJ",
1687, a royal warrant was issued directing that
the Chapel Royal should be repaired and put in
order for Catholic worship.1 A school was also
opened at Holyrood, and the king at the same
time granted from his privy purse sums of two
hundred pounds a-year each for the support of
the Chapel Royal, the mission in the Highlands,
the secular and also the Jesuit missionaries,
and the Scotch Colleges at Douai, Paris, and
Rome. It would be difficult to maintain that by
these acts of clemency and favour towards his
Catholic subjects, James had transgressed the
limits of the royal prerogative, as understood by
his predecessors. But the bigotry of his Presby
terian subjects, fed by the fanatical zeal of the
preachers, could ill brook such countenance of the
1 It was the king's intention to commit the restored abbey church
of Holyrood to the care of the Augustinian Canons - Regular, its
ancient custodians. A curious letter is extant (see the Month, Jan.
1890, p. 74) from Father Hay, a member of that Order, dated Feb
ruary 22, 1687, and describing the opening ceremonies in the tem
porary chapel which had been fitted up in the palace a few
months previously. — TRANSLATOR.
136 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
Popular abominations of Popery. The popular discontent
risings in
Edinburgh, broke out in repeated risings against the royal
authority, and the Chancellor, Lord Perth, who
like his master was a convert to Catholicism, was
grossly and publicly insulted by the mob when
returning, with his Countess, from divine service.
The summary punishment of the ringleaders gave
rise to renewed tumults, in which a number of
persons lost their lives. James himself, on the
other hand, cannot be acquitted of a tendency to
encroach on the recognised rights of the Church.
A complaint was subsequently made from Ireland,
through the nuncio at Paris, that the king had
expelled from their sees certain bishops nomi
nated by Propaganda, had caused their bulls of
appointment to be burned, and had intruded in
their places nominees of his own.1
The Catholics of England and Scotland were
allowed but a brief space of time to enjoy the ces
sation from persecution which the accession of
James II. had gained for them. The course of
1 Archiv. Vatic. Lettere del Nuntio di Francia, 1692. " Da Parigi
da Mgr. Nunzio, 16 Nov. 1693. Odo maggiori quereli dagli ecclesi
astic! d'Irlanda, che il Re Giacomo d'Inghilterra presuma d'arrogarsi
ii Jus di nominare alle chiese di quel regno senza indulto. Dices!
esser sernpre controverso dalla S. Sede come si vede nel Baronio e
nel P. Tomassini e in una decretale d'lnnocenzo III., al vescovo di
Casal [Cashel]. Che se ci6 si pretende senza Regno, che si fark se
fosse reintegrate ? Che il Re Giacomo nel viaggio che fece in
Irlanda scacci6 tutti i vescovi e parochi postivi dalla Congregazione
di Propaganda Fide, brugiando le loro bulle, e ne pose degli altri di
propria autorita, col consiglio del suo confessore morto improvisa-
mente 1'anno passato in San Germauo."
RESULT OF THE REVOLUTION OF 1688. 137
events is well known which finally compelled that
monarch, in the year 1688, to abandon his crown
to William of Orange, the husband of his eldest
daughter Mary, to fly from the kingdom, and seek
refuge in France. On July 1, 1690, his last
hope of regaining his crown was destroyed by the
fatal battle of the Boyne. The successful issue Battle of
the Boyne,
of the Revolution was not less disastrous to thejvlyl>
Scottish Episcopalian body than to the Catholics
themselves. How little sympathy was felt by the
former party with the new order of things had
been shown at the first news of the impending
evasion, when the whole of the bishops, twelve in
number, assembled in Edinburgh, and subscribed Sympathy
,& of the
an address to James, in which they expressed Scotch
* Episco-
the most loyal sentiments towards his person, ^;ins
together with the hope that God would " give James-
to him the hearts of his subjects and the necks
of his enemies."1
As to the unfortunate Scottish Catholics, they Condition
J of the
were of course exposed to the full blast of the H
Catholics
storm that had swept King1 James from the "fter ,the
Revolu-
throne. Armed mobs paraded the streets of the tlou>
capital night after night, calling for the heads of
the two chief ministers, the Chancellor Perth,
and his brother, the Earl of Melfort, Secretary of
State. An attempt to break into Holyrood, pre
vented for a time by the intrepid resistance of the
guard, was successfully renewed soon afterwards.
1 Wodrow, Hist, of the Sufferings of the Ch. of Scot., vol. iv. p. 468.
138 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
Pillage of The gates of the palace were forced, the guards
Holyrood.
brutally murdered, and chapel, schools, and
library were rifled, and their contents publicly
burnt. The mob then penetrated into the town,
and proceeded to plunder and burn the houses
of Catholics and those supposed to favour them.1
The popular fury was especially directed against
Perth and Melfort ; the latter escaped safely to
France, 'but the vessel in which the former sailed
was boarded by a party of ruffians, and the Earl,
with his Countess, was carried to Stirling Castle,
where he was closely confined for more than three
Banish- years. Being at length released, on giving a bond
ment of "
Lord^ of five thousand pounds to quit Scotland for ever,
he tetook himself to Rome, where his upright
and virtuous life won for him universal esteem.
He was on terms of intimate friendship with the
1 These excesses occurred in the month of December 1688. We
find from the annals of the time that the popular amusement of
Pope-burning was not forgotten. The Edinburgh students, on
Christmas Day of the same year, solemnly committed an effigy of
the Pontiff to the names, in presence of the magistrates and a num
ber of the Privy Council. A curious contemporary tract, entitled
An Account of the Pope's Procession at Aberdene, gives a graphic
narrative of a similar but even more ceremonious performance
enacted a few days later by the students of Marischal College,
Aberdeen. A long procession of ecclesiastical dignitaries was
followed by a species of drama, in which the Pope, on being in
formed of the recent change of government in England, falls into
a swoon. He is recovered from this by the attentions of the devil,
who holds the Pontiffs head, while the latter " vomits forth plots,
daggers, indulgences, and the blood of martyrs." The performance
ends, of course, with the condemnation of the Pope to the flames ;
and "during the time of his burning, the spectators were enter
tained with fireworks and other divertisements."— TRANSLATOR.
' DISTINGUISHED SCOTTISH CONVERTS. 139
celebrated Bossuet, whose controversial writings
had been the means of directing him to the
Catholic faith ; and subsequently to his appoint
ment as Governor to the Prince of Wales, Bossuet
dedicated to him an edition of his works. On the
death of James II. at St Germains, in September
1701, it was to the pious and eloquent Bishop
of Meaux that Perth turned for consolation in his
loss. Fifteen years later the ex-Chancellor him
self breathed his last, and was buried in the
church of the Scotch College at Paris.1 Among
other Scotch converts of distinction at this time Scottish
converts.
we meet with the name of Alexander White, who, Alexander
White.
after obtaining his doctorate in Aberdeen, went
with Charles II. to Flanders, where he was re
conciled to the Catholic Church, abandoned his
appointment as Court -preacher, and occupied
himself with the composition of a learned work,
entitled Refutatio Schismatis Anglicani." Men
tion must also be made of John Gordon, the Pro- Gordon,
Bishop of
testant Bishop of Galloway, who in 1689 went to Gaiioway.
France and afterwards to Rome, where he em
braced Catholicism, was admitted to minor orders,
and died in 1726; and of Thomas Forbes, son Thomas
Forbes.
of the first Bishop of Edinburgh, who was con-
1 Raess, Die Convertiten seit der Reformation, vol. xii. p. 415.
- Archiv. Propag. Acta, 22 Maii 1662, fol. 59. " Injungatur
oratori [Vito] munus revidendi compendium annalium ecclesi-
asticarum Baronii a Spondano compositum, et nuper in Anglicanam
linguam translatum, quod S. Congrio- imprimi mandavit. Et hujus
laboris intuitu aliisque justis de causis erogentur menstrua scuta
sex, facto tamen verbo cum Sanctissimo."
140 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
vertetl in early youth, and proved himself a
generous benefactor to the Scottish Mission.1
Excesses Notwithstanding the assurances which Wil-
connuitted
against Ham of Orange had given to the Emperor that
Catholics.
the Catholics of Great Britain should continue to
enjoy the royal protection, little or nothing seems
to have been done to moderate the violence of
the popular feeling against them.2 In December
1688, a party of fanatics sallied out of Edinburgh,
Kaid on broke into the residence of the Countess of Tra-
Traquliair.
quhair, on the Tweed, and seized a quantity of pic
tures, vestments, books, and other articles, which
they burnt at the Cross at Peebles.3 A few months
1 Gordon, Xcotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 547. Bishop Gordon had
been, previous to his nomination to Galloway, "chaplain to his
Majesty at New York." He followed the exiled king to St Ger-
mains as chaplain to the Protestant members of the royal household ;
and his conversion to Catholicism probably took place not in Rome
but in France. He survived all the other Scotch Caroline Bishops,
and died in Rome in 1726. — TRANSLATOR.
2 Archiv. Propag. Acta, 1692, fol. 18. Cardinal D'Estrees, in
presenting the report of David Burnet, vice-prefect of the Scottish
Mission, states that " Orange, having promised to the Princes his
allies not to molest the Catholics, has now, by way of appearing
to keep his word, simply abandoned them to the fury and insolence
of the mob, not one of whom has been punished for the excesses
committed by them." The Cardinal goes on to remark on the
malicious attempt that was being made to brand the Catholics as
traitors, by obliging them to swear to acknowledge William as
lawful King of England, which they could not in conscience do ;
" a pretext being thus found for persecuting them, not as Catholics,
but as rebels." Propaganda is consequently petitioned to sanction
the taking of such an oath by the Catholics ; the answer being
that the matter is remitted for consideration by a particular con
gregation.
3 The Transactions of the Soc. of Antiq. (Scotl.) for 1857 contain
an interesting inventory (contributed by Dr Laing) of the " Romish
HENRY NEVILLE PAYNE. 141
later we find recorded the imprisonment in. Burnt -
island Tolbooth. and subsequent banishment, of
Mr John Adamson for the sole crime of " Pa
pistry " ; and in the following year the committal
to Inverness Castle of Alexander Fraser of Kin-
naries for a like offence. A more notable case
was that of Henry Neville Payne, an English Neville
Catholic gentleman, who was apprehended in
Dumfriesshire in 1690, and brought to Edinburgh
on a charge of being concerned in a plot for the
restoration of James. The barbarous tortures
inflicted on him by order of the king1 failed to
extort the expected disclosures, and he was re
committed to prison, where he remained for up
wards of ten years, being released only in Febru
ary 170 1.2 The Privy Council Records for 1695
wares " carried off from Traquhair by the mob. They included
several crucifixes, a triptych lined with cloth-of-gold and inlaid with
paintings, two cases of relics, "a timber box, with many wafers in
it," " a pot full of holy oil," " Mary and the Babe in a case most
curiously wrought in a kind of pearl," some twelve dozen of wax
candles, more than a hundred books — " many of them with silver
clasps " — and a great number of other articles. In a neighbouring
house they came upon two locked trunks, " wherein they found, in
one a golden cradle, with Mary and the Babe in her bosom ; in the
other, the priests' robes." — TRANSLATOR.
1 The warrant for the torture, subscribed with William's sign-
manual, is dated at Kensington Palace. It is printed in the State
Trials, vol. x. p. 753, note. — TRANSLATOR.
2 Macaulay (Hist, of England, vol. iv. p. 682) states, but on no
authority, that Payne's " moral character had not stood high " pre
vious to his arrest. Lord Crawford, however, who presided at the
application of the torture, declared that he attributed the prisoner's
extraordinary constancy in suffering to his strong religious prin
ciples. According to Macaulay, Payne continued during the whole
142 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
describe a raid made on February 2, 1695, on a
house in Canongate, Edinburgh, where the Catho
lics had assembled for mass. The meeting was
Forcible « dissipat " by the authorities, and the priest,
dispersion •/
congr^1-0 Father David Fairfoul, together with some of the
congregation, which included two fencing-masters
and a periwig-maker named James Blair, were
committed to prison. Father Fairfoul was after
wards banished, on giving a bond of three hundred
pounds not to return to Scotland.1 A few months
later a number of Catholic controversial books
were seized in a private house in Edinburgh, and
ordered by the Lord Provost to be burnt by the
common executioner.2 Another " Popish meet
ing." was dispersed in Aberdeen, in June 1698.
On this occasion the priests made their escape,
but three citizens, named Gibb, Cowie, and Gray,
were apprehended and sent to Edinburgh, with
all their " Popish trinkets." The Aberdeen
magistrates were strictly enjoined to secure
" all Popish schoolmasters or schoolmistresses, or
breeders of youth in the Popish religion, and all
of his imprisonment to plan fresh plots and insurrections ; but we
learn from the Privy Council Eecords (ann. 1699) that a part, at
least, of those tedious years was spent in devising and perfecting
a new and improved system of river navigation. — TRANSLATOR.
1 Records of Privy Council. Chambers, Domestic Annals, vol.
iii. p. 108.
2 Ibid., p. 146. The titles of the books were The Exposition of
the True Doctrine of the Catholic Church in matters of Controversy ;
An Answer to M. Dereden's Funeral of the Mass ; and The Question
of Questions, which is, Who ought to be our Judges in all Differences
of Religion ? — TRANSLATOR.
SUFFERINGS OF THE CLERGY. 143
priests and trafficking Papists found in their
bounds." Less than a year afterwards the Duke
of Gordon was seized in his own house in Edin
burgh, where mass was being celebrated in pres
ence of a considerable gathering of Catholics.
The Duke was imprisoned for a fortnight in
the Castle, and was only liberated on presenting
a humble apology to the Privy Council.1 In
June of the same year an ex-bailie of Aberdeen,
named David Edie, was before the Council on a
double charge of apostasy and trafficking, and
after some months' imprisonment was banished
from the kingdom.2
It was on the scattered clergy of the mission Hardships
. endured
that the severity of the penal laws of course by the
clergy.
pressed most hardly ; and the report of Burnet,
the vice - prefect, presented to Propaganda by
Cardinal D'Estrees in 1692, gives a graphic
picture of the sufferings to which they were
exposed. Three out of their small number were
languishing in prison, the prefect himself was
obliged to remain under cover, and the remainder
made their way by stealth and at night from
house to house, hardly daring for fear of the
Government spies to rest in the same spot for
two days together. In winter-time they lay
concealed in the cabins of the peasants, and
during summer in mountains, woods, and caverns,
constantly exposed to hunger and thirst — for be-
1 Chambers, Domestic Annals, vol. iii. pp. 203, 204. " Ibid., p. 214.
144 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
yond the pittance of twenty scudi allowed them
by Propaganda, they had absolutely no means
of subsistence.1
We have already spoken of John Seton, a
Jesuit missionary, who was imprisoned in 1688,
arid lay for nearly five years in Blackness Castle.2
The Privy Council Records of 1693 relate that in
April of that year, being then seventy years of
age, and broken down by the sufferings of his
long confinement, he petitioned the Council that
they would " not permit him, an old sickly dying
man, to languish in prison for the few days he
can, by the course of nature and disease, continue
in this life," but allow him to retire and close his
eyes in peace in the house of some friend. It
would seem that the prayer was granted. Only a
few years later, however, in May 1700, a new and
Fresh severe Act of Parliament was passed, assigning a
against reward of five hundred merks for the detection of
Catholics.
every priest or Jesuit, and ordering the instant
banishment of all such persons, on pain of death,
if they returned to Scotland. Catholics were, by
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 18, 1692. Relatio Card. D'Estre'es.
" Dice che 25 sono li sacerdoti che si ritrovano in quella missione, et
uno che e esiliato se ne sta in Fiandra. Tre sono tenuti in stretta
carcere, et il superiore obbligato a starsene dentro. Li altri sono
forzati d'andar, vagando per la campagna di casa in casa in tempo
di notte, ne possono molto trattenersi per non esser prese dalle
milizie d' Oranges. Che nell' inverno stan nascosti ne tugurii dei
contadini, e Testate ne monti, nelle selve, nelle caverne, patendo
fame, freddo e fiachezza per la penura delle cose necessarie."
2 See ante, p. 1 27.
NOMINATION OF A VICAR- APOSTOLIC. 145
the same statute, declared incapable of inheriting
property, or of educating their children.1
It was, perhaps, the increasing difficulty of the
position in which the Scottish Catholics at this
time found themselves, that turned the attention
of the Holy See to the expediency of providing
greater facilities for the ordination of priests, and
complying at length with the desire which the
clergy had so often expressed, of being placed
under an episcopal superior. On April 27, 1694,
Pope Innocent XII. granted an extension of the
privileges which had been conceded to the Scotch
College at Paris by Paul V. and Urban VIII.2 ;
and at a session of Propaganda a few days later
it was resolved to nominate a vicar-apostolic for N
Scotland, who should receive episcopal consecra- first vicar -
apostolic
tion, and be provided by the Congregation with forSc?t-
^ land, 1694.
the necessary pontifical ornaments and other re-
1 Acts of the Part, of Scotland, vol. iii. p. 628.
2 The privileges in question are given in the Bullar. Propagand.,
Appendix ad torn. i. pp. 125, 340. They were as follows : 1. Paul
V., on May 27, 1617, granted to the college the privilege of a
private oratory, and to the rector power to give dimissorial letters
to the students to receive all the orders, up to the priesthood, ad
titulum paupertatis. 2. On January 11, 1643, Urban VIII. granted
permission to the same students, during the time of their residence
at the college, and as long as in the judgment of the Superior they
were advancing in their studies, to be admitted to all the orders,
including the priesthood, without any dimissorials, except those who
were under a bishop of their own ; and he also granted them a
plenary indulgence at the beginning and end of their course of
studies. 3. Innocent XII. confirmed the above privileges on April
27, 1694, and permitted in addition that the students should be
ordained not only extra tempora statuta, but also without observing
the interstices as ordered by the Council of Trent.
VOL. IV. K
146 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
Appoint- quirements. l The name of Thomas Nicolson was
Thomas proposed for this dignity in July and August 1694,
Nicolson. o J J •>
and was approved by Pope Innocent XII. on
August 24th of the same year.2 The new prelate
received the same faculties as the bishops of Ire
land/'3 and there was secured to him from Propa
ganda a yearly income of two hundred scudi, with
fifty more for travelling expenses. Nicolson was
of good Scottish family, being son of Sir Thomas
Nicolson of Kemnay. He was born in 1645,
brought up a Protestant, and for nearly fourteen
years held a professorship at the University of
Glasgow. Becoming a Catholic in 1682, he went
to study at Douai and Padua, and was ordained
priest three years later. In 1687 he returned
to Scotland to labour on the mission ; but when
the Revolution broke out in the following year,
although he contrived to make his escape from
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, 1694, fol. 37. (In congregatione piw-
patoria.) "Eligatur Vicarius Apostolicus cum titulo episcopal! in
partibus, et dentur ornamenta sacra cum vasis sacris et libris."
2 Archiv. Propag. Acta, 1694, fol. 100. "Tomaso Nicolson, sacer-
dote Scozzese, antico e benemerito missionario, il quale ha qualita,
dottrina e costumi ecclesiastici." See Brady, Episcopal Succession,
vol. iii. p. 456.
3 Archives of the H. Office (communicated by Canon Storti).
Sessio fer. v. 11 Novembris 1694. "Tomaso Nicolson, Vescovo
Peristachiensis, V.A. nel regno di Scozia, ebbe per decreto di Propa
ganda de 5 Ottobre 1694, le stesse facolta che i Vescovi della Ir-
landa, vale a dire quelle della formola sesta di Propaganda." Ibid.,
fer. vi. 21 August! 1698. " Fuerunt renovate ad aliud quinquen
nium per decretum de Propaganda Fide, 28 Julii 1698, facultates
concedi solitse episcopis pro locis hreresi infectis." The faculties in
question were practically identical with those previously granted to
the English arch-priests. See ante, vol. iii. p. 423 et seq., note.
CONSECRATION OF BISHOP NICOLSON, 1695. 147
Edinburgh, he was apprehended at Stirling, and
imprisoned for some months. On the security of
his brother, he was permitted to leave the coun
try, and crossed over to France, where he was
for three years confessor to a convent at Dun
kirk. It was here that he received the news of his
nomination as Bishop of Peristachium and Vicar-
Apostolic for Scotland ; and he was consecrated His conse
cration at
at Paris, in the archbishop's chapel, on February Paris, Feb-
J ruary!695.
27, 1695 — the officiating prelate being Mgr. Mas-
caron, Bishop of Agen, assisted by the Bishops of
Ypres and Lucon.1
Immediately after his consecration, Bishop Nic- Difficulties
in the way
olson left Paris to return to Scotland ; but for of his re-
turn to
want of passports he was compelled to remain Scotlaml-
in Holland for upwards of a year. From a letter
of Giulio Piazza, the internuncio at Brussels, it
would seem that the bishop was ready to venture
to enter England even without passports, pro
vided that the authorities were willing to cancel
the bond for three thousand florins given by his
brother as security for his remaining abroad.2
At the instance of Propaganda, the internuncio
applied on Nicolson's behalf to the Duke of
Bavaria; and on November 4, 1695, he reported
that the Duke had instructed his Ministers to
1 Brady, loc. tit. Gordon, Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. ] .
2 Archiv. Propag. Acta, 1695, fol. 212. " Purche possa ottenere
prima da questo, ch'il suo fratello sia libero della sigurtci di -^-fiorini,
che fece, quando il suddetto Mgr. Nicolson fu mandate in esilio."
148 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
see that Scarlatti, his ambassador in London,
took the necessary steps to obtain the desired
permission.1 On January 27, 1696, Piazza was
able to inform the Congregation that King
William had granted the requisite licence, which
would be forthwith transmitted to the bishop in
Holland.2 Notwithstanding the royal permis
sion, it would seem that Nicoison was arrested
and imprisoned immediately on his arrival in
England in November 1696, and was not released
until the following May.
Letter from The bishop's own wish was naturally to enter
Bishop ,
Nicoison as soon as possible on the field 01 labour assigned
to Propa-
S?n<l^w to him by the Holy See ; and we can gather from
May 1695. •> J
a letter addressed by him to Propaganda from
Brussels on May 17, 1695, what was the spirit
in which he was prepared to undertake his new
duties. " It will be my endeavour," he wrote,
1 Arch. Prop. Scozia, Scritt. rifer. I. " Ho trovato cosl ben dis-
posto il Signor Duca per lettere per impiegare il suo credito in In-
ghilterra in favore di Mgr. Nicoison, che mi ha promesso di par-
larne a quelli suoi ministri, onde informati di quanto si richiede ne
possa incaricarsi il Signor Abbate Scarlatti presentemente suo in-
viato in Londra, acci6 procuri al sudetto prelate un passaporto per
trasferirsi in Scozia, oppure che ottenga la liberazione del fratello
dalla cauzione che per lui chiede quando fu mandate in esiglio."
2 Ibid., loc. cit. " Esseiido riuscito al Sign. Abbate Scarlatti medi-
aiite le istanze fatte a nome di quello Signor Duca per lettere di
ottenere dal Principe d'Oranges a Mgr. Nicoison, Vescovo Peristach-
eniense, la permissione di portarsi in Scozia, che da me li sark tras-
messa la prossima Domenica in Ollanda." Efforts have recently
been made, but unsuccessfully, to discover in the State archives at
Munich the report sent to his government by the Bavarian ambas
sador in London.
NICOLSON'S LETTER TO PROPAGANDA. 149
" to let his Holiness and the cardinals see from
my deeds rather than my words, that it has
never even entered my mind to look for a home
in this country, but that I am anxious to betake
myself as soon as possible to the place of my
abode and my labours. . . . Nor am I less firmly
determined to keep within the limits of the au
thority committed to me, that is, of a vicar entire
ly dependent on the Apostolic See. In truth, I
should be guilty of great folly were I to pretend
to exercise the jurisdiction of a bishop in ordinary
—a course of action which would make a most
unfortunate impression on others, and greatly im
pede the fruit of our labours. We ought to aim
at peace and unity, to profit all and hinder none,
to secure a sound administration rather by love
and kindness than by the authoritative power of
our office. ... I have frequently laid before the
internuncio the afflicted condition of our brethren,
and have myself informed the most eminent Car
dinal de Spada on the subject. I am aware that
all priests are by public decree ordered to be
banished, and I know also the cruel disposition
of the Calvinists who are now in authority in
Scotland. In England it is not so ; and hence
the Belgians infer that the persecution of our
people does not emanate from the sovereign ; but
what is done by the king's privy council must be
considered as done by himself." The vicar-apos-
tolic addressed his first report from Scotland to fromSoot-
150 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
land, Sep- the Sacred Congregation on September 21, 1697.1
1697. Writing from Aberdeen, he expresses his obli
gations to the nuncios at Cologne and Brussels
for their counsel and assistance, and accounts
for his delay in reaching Scotland by the fact
of his imprisonment in London. He reports
highly of the learning, zeal, and piety of the
few missionaries in the country, both secular and
regular, but deplores the harm done to Catholics
by the scepticism and corruption of morals which
were everywhere prevalent. He asks for more
extended faculties to enable him to meet the
difficulties caused by the sanction given by the
civil law to marriages within the second degree,
and speaks of the efforts which were being made
to establish schools in the Highland districts.
His second Bishop Nicolson's second report to Propaganda
September was forwarded on September 5, 1698, through
1698. .
John Irvin, the procurator of the Scotch Mission
in Paris.2 Irvin refers at the beginning of his
Persecu- letter to the persecution at that time raging; in
tion pre
vailing in Scotland against the Catholic clergy, who, wher-
Scotland. »•/ '
ever possible, were apprehended and carried pris
oners to Edinburgh ; and he adds that, being
himself one of the best known of their number,
he had endeavoured to prevent the further mo
lestation of his colleagues by giving notice to
the authorities of his intention to quit the coun-
1 A translation of the document is given in Appendix VI.
2 See Appendix VII.
VISITATION OF THE HIGHLANDS, 1700. 151
try two months previously. The missionaries
then labouring in Scotland included ten Jesuits, ^;..
n of mission
four Benedictines, and twenty-three secular priests. aries-
The bishop himself was indefatigable not only in
the exercise of his episcopal office — confirming,
preaching, and instructing both clergy and people
—but also in his labours as a simple missionary
priest, traversing wide districts on foot in order
to visit the sick and administer the sacraments.
An Italian version is extant of part of the bishop's
own report to the Congregation in the year 1700.1
This document, which is unfortunately the only
one that has been preserved of those transmitted
to Rome by Bishop Nicolsoii at this period of
his vicariate, describes the visitation of the visitation
ot the
Highlands and Islands held in the months
May, June, July, and August 1700. In illus- ^
tration of the obstacles which he had to en
counter, the bishop mentions that he travelled
through those wild northern regions for days to
gether without meeting with a single human habi
tation. His first station was the island of Egg, Egg.
where he found three hundred Catholics, all con
stant in the faith and loyal to their king; and
he subjoins a singular story about a number of
these islanders having recently suffered martyr
dom at the hands of an "English pirate named
Porringer " who gave them the choice of death
^5 * O
or apostasy. On the island of Canna there were Can™.
1 Appendix VIII.
152 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
a hundred and thirty Catholics, and some fifteen
Uist. hundred in Uist, including the owner of the
island, the chief of the Macdonalcls, who received
the bishop with every mark of cordial respect.
The latter also refers in high terms to the pro-
Bami. prietor of the isle of Barra, an old man and a
fervent Catholic, who was accustomed himself to
instruct his people every Sunday in religious doc
trine. The bishop returned to the mainland at
the end of July. He appears to attribute the
growth of Protestantism in the Highlands chiefly
to the want of sufficient priests, and to the prac
tice of sending the sons of the chieftains to be
educated in Protestant schools in the south. The
best hopes for the future lay in the proposed
establishment of Catholic schools in the West
Highlands, although the continuance of the per
secutions and the extraordinary efforts requisite
to provide for the payment of teachers could not
but be a source of great anxiety.
Moral and The period to which belong the devoted labours
religious
ftiSa * Scottish vicar-apostolic is perhaps in
in 1700. some respects one of the darkest in the history
of our country. We will let an impartial modern
writer depict the state of Scotland a century and
a half after the establishment of Protestantism.
"Men," writes Chambers,1 "in trying to make
each other Episcopalians and Presbyterians, had
1 Domestic Annals, vol. ii. p. 497.
CONDITION OF SCOTLAND, 1700. 153
almost ceased to be Christians. The population
was small and generally poor, and little had been
done to advance the arts of life. Scotland had
sent forth no voice in either literature or science ;
her universities could not train either the lawyer
or the physician. No news - sheet, no stage
coaches, no system of police, existed in the realm.
In certain intellectual and moral respects, the
country was in no better state. The judge was
understood to be accessible to private persuasions,
and even direct bribes were suspected. The
people believed as firmly in witchcraft as in the
first principles of religion."
" There was one country " — we cite a historian
who is at least not prejudiced in favour of Cathol
icism1 — "in which the Puritan ministers suc
ceeded in moulding alike the character and the
habits of the nation, and in disseminating their
harsh and gloomy tenets through every section
of society. While England was breaking loose
from her most ancient superstitions, and advanc
ing with gigantic strides along the paths of
knowledge, Scotland still cowered in helpless
subjection before her clergy. Never was a
mental servitude more complete, and never was
a tyranny maintained with more inexorable
barbarity. Supported by public opinion, the
Scottish ministers succeeded in overawing all
1 Lecky, History of Rationalism (ed. 1865), vol. i. pp. 137, 138.
154 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1660-1702.
opposition, and prohibiting the faintest expres
sion of adverse opinions." As late as 1773, we
are told, the " divines of the associated Presby
tery " passed a resolution declaring their belief
in witchcraft, and deploring the general scep
ticism on the subject.1
It was hardly to be expected that in the in
cessant conflicts waged by the opposing Protes
tant sects, as well against one another as against
the adherents of the old religion, which was
equally obnoxious to both, much room could be
found for the organisation of any public works of
a charitable nature. " The ancient Church," as
Chambers truly remarks,2 "was honourably dis
tinguished by its charity towards the poor, and
more especially towards the diseased poor ; and
it was a dreary interval of nearly two centuries
which intervened between the extinction of its
lazar-houses and leper-houses and the time when
merely a civilised humanity dictated the estab
lishment of a regulated means of succour for the
sickness-stricken of the humbler classes." It
was not until 1721 that the idea was first
mooted of founding a hospital in Edinburgh, and
nearly another decade passed before it found
realisation.
Such was the condition of Scotland when
1 Lecky, History of Rationalism, vol. i. p. 147.
2 Chambers, Domestic A nnals, vol. iii. p. 557.
CONDITION OF SCOTLAND, 1700. 155
Innocent XII. despatched the first vicar-apostolic
to rule the scattered and down-trodden Catho
lics of that country. It will now be our task to
trace the result of his labours, and those of his
successors, during the course of the eighteenth
century.
156
CHAPTER III.
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND FROM
1700 TO 1760.
condition Kixc4 WILLIAM III. died in March 1702, after a
of the
Catholics reign of fourteen years. Some recent writers,
under Wil- ^
liamin. notably Onno Klopp in his important historical
work on the fall of the House of Stuart, have
maintained, chiefly on the ground of the reports
of the imperial ambassador in London, that
William showed himself somewhat indulgent to
wards his English Catholic subjects. As far as
Scotland and Ireland were concerned, however,
this was certainly not the case. The represen
tations made by the imperial ambassador in
in Ireland, favour of the Irish Catholics promised, indeed,
to be effectual, but were followed by no good
results. On the contrary, the penal statutes
were put into execution both in Ireland and in
Scotland, during the reign of William, with even
more severity than before ; and in order to blind
the emperor to the real state of affairs, addresses
were circulated in Ireland by the Government,
SCOTLAND UNDER WILLIAM III. AND ANNE. 157
purporting to assure him, in the name of the
unfortunate Catholics, of the complete religious
freedom which they were supposed to enjoy.
The names of such Catholics as refused to sub
scribe to these fictitious addresses were surrep
titiously added to the documents by order of the
authorities.1
As regarded Scotland, the condition of the an.i in
Catholics of that country under William III.
was little, if at all, better than that of their
Irish co-religionists. The kino- in fact, aban-
O O 3
doned them altogether to the fanaticism of the
people, and the priests especially were proceeded
against with the utmost severity. The acces- Accession
sion of Anne, the sister-in-law of William, and Anne.
1 British Museum, Addit. MSS., 31,248. Papers of Cardinal
Gualterio. Letters relating to Irish and Scotch Catholics, 1692-
1709, fol. 15 (without date or subscription). "Estratto d'una
lettera del Primate d'Irlanda, mandate al suo Procuratore in Roma.
Habbiamo cattive novelle della barbara maniera che i nostri amici
in Hibernia son trattati dalli heretici. L'aiino passato fu fatta
lamentatione espressa a 1'Imperatore delli oltraggi commessi in
cotesto Regno contro li poveri Cattolici, il quale ha scritto al
Principe d'Oranges a favore de medesimi. L'Oranges ha rescritto
al Imperatore che godevano tutta la liberta che desideravano, e per
cio confirmare maggiormente, ha fatto fare un instrumento che
dovea esser sottoscritto da tutto il clero e popolo. II quale instru
mento fu presentato a loro in tutte le parti del Regno per li messi
d'Oranges ; ma li Cattolici hanno generalmente rifiutato di sotto-
scriverlo. Questo rifiuto ha irritato 1'Oraiiges in modo che avanti
Natale primo passato ha dato ordine che tutti fossero messi prigione
sotto pretesto di sicurta contro la loro rebellione, ovvero nova calata
de Francesi che lui temeva, e questa loro prigionia duro sin al
ultimo di Febraro sequeiite, quando senza la loro saputa ha fatto
sottoscrivere il . . . instrumento con i norni di tutti quanti e 1'ha
mandato al Imperatore."
158 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
younger daughter of James II., brought little
relief to the Scottish Catholics. The reign of
the last of the Stuarts was signalised by an event
fraught with important results for the future of
union of Scotland — namely, the Union, in 1707, of that
England
fnddSi707 country and England into one kingdom. ' There
are a few princes," remarks Burton, " that, from
a sincere distaste of royalty and the cares of
government, have descended from the throne ;
but the voluntary consent of a numerous senate
to resign its legislative functions for ever is an
event unexampled in the history of mankind." l
The voices of the Marquis of Annandale, Lord
Belhaven, and a few more patriotic spirits, were
in vain raised to protest against this national
humiliation. Once again, as had happened too
Means i>y often in the past history of the country, Scottish
was car- scruples were silenced by English gold. Twenty
thousand pounds were sent down from the
English Treasury for distribution ; and the Union
was carried by the paltry majority of thirty-three
votes. By way of soothing the susceptibilities
and calming the apprehensions of the people, it
was ordered that the regalia should remain in
Scotland, and should be deposited in Edinburgh
Castle. A special statute was passed providing
for the maintenance and establishment of the
Presbyterian system in Scotland. Toleration was
at the same time guaranteed to members of the
1 Burton, Hist, of Scotland, vol. viii. ch. Ixxxvi.
THE PEXAL LAWS UNDER ANNE. 159
Episcopal communion ; l it was enacted that all
future successors to the crown must belong to
the Church of England, and the claim of the
bishops to sit and vote in Parliament was duly
recognised. The rights of ecclesiastical patronage
were also secured and preserved. Liberty of
conscience and worship was refused to only one
form of religious belief, and that the one to which
o
the whole nation had adhered for more than a
thousand years.2
Durino- the reign of Queen Anne the penal continued
n. . . . severity of
laws continued in full force against the Scottish the penal
laws.
Catholics. On September 23, 1702, Cardinal
Noris presented to Propaganda a report from
Bishop Nicolson, stating that the object of the
Government was the total extermination of the
Catholic religion throughout the country. It
was absolutely forbidden to employ Catholics in
domestic service, and every effort was being made
to apprehend and convict as many priests as
possible.3 James Gordon, Nicolson's procurator
in Paris, and rector of the Scotch College there,
1 The Act of Toleration here referred to was not passed until 1712,
five years subsequent to the Union. — TRANSLATOR.
2 See Burton, op. cit.
3 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 260, 26 Sept. 1702. "Gravezze che
soft'rono per la presente persecuzione ad essi [Cattolici] mossa dal
parlamento di quel Regno con severissimi editti tendenti al ester-
minio totale della Religione, poicho ... si proibisce ai padroni di
tener servitori Cattolici, si ordina, che si facciano esatte diligenze
per iscoprire e carcerare i sacerdoti e condannarli se 11011 abjuranno
la s. fede."
160 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
wrote at the same time, and in similar terms,
to the nuncio.1 A letter received a few months
later by John Irvine Lines, and preserved in
the archives of Propaganda, states that rigorous
search was being made for priests in every house
throughout the country, and that the Privy
Council had offered a reward of five hundred
marks to any one apprehending a priest. The
Auti-cath- writer goes on to describe a burlesque procession
which had taken place in Edinburgh on the eve
of the opening of the General Assembly. A large
number of vestments and sacred pictures, which
had been found in the houses of Catholics, were
carried in triumph through the streets : the com
mon hangman was attired in the richest of these
vestments, with a large crucifix in one hand
and a consecrated chalice in the other, and his
assistants were similarly arrayed. The procession
traversed the entire city, amid the blasphemies
and execrations of the populace, and the spoils
were then publicly committed to the flames.2 In
1 Brit. Mus., Addit. MSS., 20,311. Papers of Cardinal Gualterio,
1701-1716, fol. 21. Paris, Id. Septembr. 1702. "Quantum vero
mutata sit [conditio missionis] his ultiniis decent mensibus, nemo
qui non viderit conjicere potest, immanis vero ilia in deterius
mutatio, ex srevissimis illis recentibus comitiorum Eegni decretis
fluxit." Philip Antony Gualteri was nuncio in Paris in 1700, and
assisted James II. at his last moments. In 1713 he was made
cardinal and protector of Scotland. He died in 1728 at Eome, and
was buried in the cathedral of Orvieto. See Cardella, Memorie
Storiche, vol. viii. p. 91.
2 Archiv. Prop. Scozia, Scritture rifer., vol. ii., 4 Maggio 1704.
Al Signer Giovanni Irvino Ludovico Lines. " Deve sapere VS. che
PROCLAMATION AGAINST CATHOLICS. 161
March 1704 the Queen issued a solemn pro- Royal pro
clamation,
clamation, calling on all sheriffs, bailies, magis- 1704.
trates, officers of the law, and justices of the
peace, at once to " put the laws in force against
Jesuits, priests, sayers of mass, resetters or har-
bourers of priests, or hearers of mass ; to seize
and apprehend priests, Papists, and Jesuits ; to
put down all mass meetings. All persons who
shall apprehend and convict any priest, Papist,
traffiquer, Jesuit, harbourer, or resetter, shall
have a reward of five hundred merks, besides
11011 si capitano piu lettere da due nostri amici in Scotia, i quali
sono incarcerati, ovvero assai lontano ritirati per poter nascondersi.
Tuttavia dalle lettere d'Ingliilterra sapemmo, die presentemente in
Scotia e accesa la piu crudele persecuzione che dai tempi di Knox
mai fosse in quelle parte sentita. Vi haiino fatto uno generale
ricerca per tutte le case de' Cattolici del Regno, andando a testa i
President! medesimi et i soldati condottieri di quel famoso popo-
laccio, e con protesto di cercare per sacerdoti hanno spogliato e
sacheggiato la piu parte de' Cattolici, et a cio fare ne ha prestato
autorita il Consiglio Private, assegnando cinquecento Marki (cioe
una raoneta poco meno di un testone 1'una) per rimuneratione a
quello a cui sar;\ riuscito di cattivare alcun sacerdote. Piu del
Sign. Davidson (vecchio missionario del clero e gia esiliato una
volta e senza licenza ritornato) fatto prigione a Leith quattro o
cinque altri sacerdoti sono stato presi ne' contorni d'Edinburgo, sin'
oro non sapemmo i loro nomi. II giorno antecedente alia prima
sessione dell' Assemblea Generale di Predicanti, si fece una pro-
cessione burlesca per tutte le strade d'Edinburgo, portanda in
trionfo una grande quantita di paramenti e sacre Imagini, che
trovato havevano nelle case de' Cattolici. Tra altri profanamenti,
vestirono il publico Boia de' piu ricchi ornamenti che havessero,
dandogli un gran crocitisso in una mano, et un calice consecrato
nell' altra, e nell' istessa foggio pararono il servitore del Boia et
altri manigoldi, e quando in questo modo esecrato attraversata
havevano tutta la citta con inaudite blasfemie abbrucciarono solen-
nemente ogni cosa nella publica piazza."
VOL. IV. L
162 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
expenses." The ministers are at the same time
commanded to be diligent in taking the names
of all persons " suspected of Popery, or who have
apostatised from the Protestant religion." l The
object of this latter regulation was to second the
efforts of the Kirk, which had set on foot a
system of universal inquisition worthy of the
darkest and most intolerant days of the sixteenth
century.
statistics In the Miscellany of the Maitland Club is
churchiu printed a list of "Popish parents and their
Scotland. , . . ft c^ 1 1 i
children in various districts of Scotland, as given
in to the Lords of the Privy Council and to the
Commission of the General Assembly, 1701 to
1705." 2 The number of Catholics assigned to
Edinburgh amounts to 160, among them being
the Duke and Duchess of Gordon, with their
family and household ; Lady Mary Keith (daugh
ter of Earl Marischal) ; Lady Kerr and her six
children ; Lady Douglas and family ; Alexander
Finnic, formerly Episcopal minister at Darnock ;
Fathers Carnegie and M'Mackie ; and several
teachers, advocates, surgeons, and members of
other professions. From Leith five Catholics
are reported, and from Glasgow, which is said
to be a place of resort for Papists from other
quarters, twelve. A complaint was brought by
the Synod of Dumfries that the minister there
1 Miscellany of the Maitland Club, vol. iii. p. 392.
2 Ibid., p. 396 ct seq.
STATISTICS OF THE CHURCH, 1701. 163
" had by the Papists his horse thrust through
with a sword," because he was the means of
getting their priest, Father Innes, apprehended.1
The names of twenty Catholics are returned from
Perth. The most interesting details, however,
are contained in the reports from the Highlands The mgh-
and Islands, which run as follows : " First — South islands.
Uist and Barra. The people here are nearly all
Papists. Nicolson, a Popish bishop, was there
lately, and in other Highland parishes, giving
confirmation. Second — Canna, Bum, and Muck :
all Popish. Third — Knoydart and Morar : all
Papists except four. Fourth — Arisaig, Moydart,
and Glengarry : all Papists except one man. In
the above places there are about 4500 Papists.
There are six priests and only five ministers in
the whole bounds of the Presbytery of Skye."
Among the northern lists we find very bitter
complaints from the parish of Glengarden of one
Calam Grierson, alias M'Gregor, a " notorious
Papist and receiver of Popish priests," who had
built a chapel, had presumed to erect " a very
high crucifix on the top of a hill, to be adored by
all the neighbourhood," and had public mass and
" Popish conventicles " in his house.2
A popular rising took place in Dumfriesshire in Protestant
1704 against the Catholic gentry of the district, BSSs-
several houses being pillaged, and books, pictures,
1 Miscellany of the Maitland Club, vol. iii. p. 492.
2 Ibid., pp. 424-440.
164 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
and other objects of devotion being publicly
burned. On March 14 of the same year, a
number of Catholic books and vestments were
burned at the Cross in Edinburgh ; while chalices
and other gold and silver articles were ordered by
the magistrates to be melted down. The pro
curator of the Scottish mission duly reported
these outrages to Propaganda, and they were
brought before the Congregation at a session held
in the following September. The same report
made mention of the continued persecution of the
missionary priests, one of whom had died in con
sequence, while others were suffering imprison
ment and exile.1
Lull in the During the next few years there would appear
per.secu-
tion. to have been a lull in the storm of persecution
directed against the Catholics, as we find Bishop
Nicolson reporting in 1708 that the mission was
enjoying peace, and that many converts were
being added to the Church.2 By the year 1710,
however, the ministers, who regarded this increase
with jealous eyes, were again successfully agitat-
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 294, 22 Sept. 1704. " Sacerdoti dili-
gentemente cercati dagli eretici per tutte le case de Cattolici, colla
morte d'uno de' medesimi, colla prigionia et esilio d'un altro, oltre
al pubblico insulto fatti alle sapellettili profanate et abbrucciate per
le strade."
2 Ibid., fol. 701, 17 Dec. 1708. " Si per la pace che vi se gode, si
anche per il frutto notabile, che vi si fa con le continue conversion!
degli eretici, massime nelle montagne." It was during this period
of comparative peace that James Gordon (a cadet of the ancient
house of Letterfourie) was appointed and consecrated coadjutor-
bishop to Bishop Nicolson (April 11, 1706). — TRANSLATOR.
RESULT OF THE RISING OF 1715. 165
ing for the enforcement of the penal laws ; l and Results of
the first Jacobite rising five years later entailed ite rebel-
fresh sufferings on the Scottish Catholics. Many
priests were imprisoned or banished, and from a
report of Bishop Gordon sent to Propaganda in
1716, it would seem that the persecution was
exceptionally virulent. The Catholics were, in
deed, in danger of total annihilation, and it
almost appeared as if their religion were on the
verge of disappearing from the country.2 In
spite, however, of every difficulty, the mission
aries continued zealous in the performance of
their duties, and conversions of heretics were of
daily occurrence.3 " The great matter we have
before us," wrote Wodrow from the General
Assembly in 1721, "is the terrible growth of
Popery in the north. We met on that committee
from three to seven this night. The accounts
are most lamentable. . . . Bishops, priests, and
Jesuits are exercising openly their functions ;
seminaries and schools are openly set up, and
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 230, 23 Jun. 1710. " Grave persecu-
zione mossa centre di essi da ministri eretici, che fanno ogni sforzo
per estirpare da quel regno la santa fede, sino a far punir coll' esilr
i laici."
2 Ibid., fol. 64, 29 Nov. 1716. "Di modo che questi [Cattolici]
restano non solo afflitti, ma oppress! dalla violenza degli eretici e
sta in evidente pericolo di perdersi affatto trh, pochi anni la reli-
gione Cattolica, se Iddio non provede miracolosamente al bisogno.
... In tanta calamitk, per6 non trascurasi dai missionarii il proprio
officio."
3Ibid.,fol. 131,8 Mart. 1718. "E seguono giornalmente delle
conversion! de' medesimi eretici."
166 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
multitudes sent abroad and coming home from
Popish seminaries every three or four months." l
Arrest of At a session of Propaganda held in July 1722, a
Wallace, letter was read from the procurator of the Scotch
mission, giving an account of the apprehension of
Bishop Wallace at Edinburgh two months pre
viously.2 The bishop was arrested on May the
10th, together with twelve other Catholics, in the
house of the Duchess of Gordon, where he was
about to say mass, and was taken to prison under
a strong guard of soldiers.3 He was liberated on
bail, but declining to appear to take his trial, was
formally outlawed. The uneasiness of the Govern
ment at the progress of Catholicism in the North
is testified by the fact reported by Wodrow, that
the king (George I.) granted in 1725 the sum of
one thousand pounds to promote Protestantism
in the Highlands.4
The Holy See was about this time informed of
tion of
Protestant the establishment of a society which, while having
missionary •>
society.
1 Wodrow, Correspondence, vol. ii. p. 586.
2 Wallace had been consecrated in 1720 coadjutor to Bishop
Gordon. — TRANSLATOR.
3 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 340, 7 Julii 1722. " Wallace . . .
fu arrestato con dodici persone secolari incirca ivi radunati per
udirla [messa], e benche non lo trovassero in atto di celebrare [he
was engaged in hearing confessions — TRANSLATOR], e non fosse ri-
conosciuto per vescovo o sacerdote, nondimeno per sospetto che fosse
tale dal suo grave portamento, e che gli altri fossero cattolici, furono
condotti tutti insieme sotto buoua custodia di soldati alle carceri
pubbliche, ove restano strettamente custoditi. Respons. Scribatur
per Secretarium Status Ulyssiponam."
4 Wodrow, Correspondence, vol. iii. p. 193 (May 7, 1725).
EFFORTS OF PROTESTANT MISSION ARIES. 167
for its ostensible object the spread of Christianity
among the heathen, in reality systematised the
work of opposition to the Catholic Church by
employing every means to procure the apostasy
of adherents to the ancient faith. According to
a report transmitted by the vicar-apostolic in
June 1G25, the society in question had at its
disposal considerable funds, which were applied
to the support of ministers and the erection and
maintenance of schools. Efforts were being made
to trade upon the necessitous condition of the
Catholics, who were in this respect at a great
disadvantage with regard to their opponents, and
a pecuniary grant was therefore asked for from
the Congregation, which assigned a donation
accordingly of five hundred scudi.1 The death i^ath of
of the second Duke of Gordon in 1728 was a on;0rdon,
serious blow to the Catholics of Scotland. Ever
since the Reformation this powerful family had
remained staunch to the Church, and had fur
nished her with a long succession of faithful
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 175, !) April 172(5. " Una certa com-
pagnia a titolo di propagare la fede Cristiana tra i Barbari, ma
diretta in fatto alia perversione dei Cattolici, che si contengono
costanti, in tutti quei paesi. . . . Siccho potranno mandare in
ogni parte gran numero di maestri, catechisti, e predicanti per
aprir scuole dappertutto della loro eresia ; spargendo libri ripieni
di falze cahmnie. Rcspons. Annuerunt pro summa scutorum quin-
gentorurn pro una vice." The allusion is not improbably to the
Society for the Propagation of the Gospel, founded in 1701. The
first exclusively Scotch Protestant missionary body (the Scottish
Missionary Society) did not come into existence until nearly a cen
tury later (1796). — TRANSLATOR.
168 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
defenders. Unhappily, the second duke had
married a Protestant, Henrietta Mordaunt, who,
after his death, was induced to bring up the
whole family in her own religion. The duchess,
who survived her husband thirty years, was re
warded by Government with a pension of a
thousand pounds.1
Labours Throughout the twenty - three years of his
Nicoison. vicariate, Bishop Nicolson manifested a truly
apostolic zeal in the performance of the arduous
and important duties intrusted to him by the
Holy See. One of his first cares was to divide
the whole country into fixed districts, to each of
which missionaries were assigned ; and he pro
ceeded shortly afterwards to draw up, for the
better regulation of the mission, a code of statutes
. . , ,
which has continued in iorce almost down to our
own times.2 They were preceded by a number of
monita, or admonitions, having special reference
to the relations of the missionary priests with
their Protestant neighbours, warning them against
internal dissensions, and exhorting them to ani
mate their flocks, both by example and precept,
to lead edifying and Christian lives. The statutes
themselves, which were unanimously agreed upon
1 Walsh, History of Catholic Church in Scotland, p. 500.
2 This is not quite accurate. The statuta of Bishop Nicolson
continued to regulate the Scottish mission until 1780, when Bishop
Hay and his colleagues incorporated them into the new code of
statutes which they drew up that year. See Life of Bishop Hay
(Gordon, Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 209). — TRANSLATOR.
Mission is.
STATUTES OF BISHOP NICOLSOX. 169
at a meeting1 of the clergy held in April 1700, and statuta
Missioms
afterwards received the sanction of Propaganda, (1700).
form a very complete and important index to the
condition and needs of the Scottish mission at
that time. The following is a summary of their
provisions. The first title treats of the Catholic i. ofthe
J . . Catholic
faith. 1. The clergy are forbidden to stigmatise faith.
any Catholic as guilty of heresy unless clear
proof can be brought against him. 2. They are
not to dispute amongst themselves, either publicly
or privately, on religious questions. 3. The faith
ful are to be warned against the errors of the
Bourignonites.1 4. The clergy are not to enter-
on religious discussions with the ministers with
out the previous approbation of their superiors.
5. Catholics assisting at Protestant services,
either for temporal gain or to avert some loss
from themselves, are to be subjected to public
penance. Second title: of reconciling heretics. 2. of re
conciling
1. The motives which lead heretics to seek re- heretics.
conciliation with the Church are to be sedulously
examined ; and they are to be exhorted not only
to the acceptance of the Catholic faith, but also
to amendment of life. 2. Converts must receive
careful instruction before being admitted into the
Church. 3. Those already under the censures of
1 See Hergenrother, Church History, vol. ii. p. 685. Antoinette
Bouriguon de la Porte died in 1680 at Franeker in Friesland. She
was the author of several treatises embodying visionary and erro
neous ideas, and deeply tinged with Quietism.
170 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
their own Church are to be diligently proved, and
Missionis . . .
(1700). not received without the previous sanction 01 the
•3. of the vicar-apostolic or his representatives. Third title:
bishops.
of the authority of the bishop. 1. All the clergy,
including, according to a decree of Propaganda,
Jesuits and regulars of every kind, are subjected
to the bishop as regards hearing confessions, the
cure of souls, and administration of the sacra
ments. 2. Special and more ample faculties will
be granted to such experienced and worthy priests
as the bishop may select. 3. The reserved cases
are arson, homicide, duelling, incest in the first
degree, and burglary. 4. Cause of dispute, should
such arise, between the regular and secular clergy
to be referred to the bishop, and from him, if
necessary, to the Holy See. 5. Vows of per
petual chastity not to be administered to women
4. of the without the episcopal authority. Fourth title:
pastoral
office. of the pastoral office. 1. The missionaries are
to have fixed places of residence, and not to
change them without due authority. 2. Every
pastor is to render an account of his adminis
tration to the bishop or his delegates. 3. To
ensure uniformity of discipline, confessors are to
be guided by the Roman Ritual and the instruc
tions of St Charles Borromeo. 4. The movable
feasts of the year are to be announced to the
people at the Epiphany. 5. The time for ful
filling the Easter obligation is to be prolonged,
if necessary, until Pentecost ; and the names of
STATUTES OF BISHOP XICOLSON. 171
those failing1 to fulfil it by the latter date are to statuta
Missionis
be given in to the bishop. 6. Public and scan- (i?oo).
dalous offenders are to be subjected to public
penance. 7. Apostates not to be reconciled to
the Church until they have been diligently tried
and have made public satisfaction. 8. The same
to be observed with regard to soothsayers and
sorcerers. 9. Each missionary is to keep a
register of baptisms, marriages, deaths, and con
versions, and to take due precautions that it
does not fall into the hands of heretics. 10. The
deaths of benefactors and of brother-priests are
also to be registered, that due prayers may be
offered for them. Fifth title: of the priestly life 5. ofthe
. p prie.stly
and character. 1. The spiritual welfare of theiifeand
character.
flock depends in great measure on the virtues of
the pastor. 2. The clergy are to beware of fre
quenting taverns, of familiarity with the other
sex, publicly joining in field -sports or similar
gatherings. 3. Each pastor before entering on
the mission, and every year afterwards, is to
make a retreat for several days. 4. No mis
sionary to be absent from his flock for more than
three weeks without express permission. 5. The
clergy are only permitted to carry arms for pur
poses of self-defence, where necessary. Sixth
title : of the instruction of youth. 1 . Parents 6. Of the
instruction
are to be impressed with the importance of re- of youth.
ligious teaching for their children. 2. Those who
permit their children to be brought up in heresy
172 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
statuta are to do public penance, and to be deprived of
Missioms
(1700). the sacraments. 3. The clergy are to give re
ligious instruction not only on Sundays and
Festivals, but are to seek out the young and
ignorant in their own homes for the purpose.
4. Pastors, especially in the Highlands, are to
make every effort to establish Catholic schools
in their respective districts. 5. In order to in
crease the number of labourers in the vineyard,
the clergy are to endeavour to select from among
their flocks, and to provide for the education of,
such youths as appear to be adapted for the
L!ts°nd Pr^estnooc^- Seventh and eighth titles: of the
fasts. feasts and fasts of the Church.1 Ninth title:
9. of bap- of baptism and confirmation. 1. The clero-y are
tisni and o J
not to baptise the children of Protestants, except
on these conditions : proximate danger of death,
refusal on the part of the ministers to baptise,
and the sponsors to be Catholic. 2. Catholics
who permit their children to be baptised by the
ministers — in itself a grave sin, and the source of
1 The holy-days of obligation prescribed are the following : Cir
cumcision, Epiphany, Purification, Annunciation, Ascension, Corpus
Christi, Nativity of St John Baptist, SS. Peter and Paul, Assump
tion, All Saints, Christmas and two following days. The fasting-
days are the forty days of Lent, Ember Days, Vigils of St Matthias,
Pentecost, St John Baptist, SS. Peter and Paul, St James, St
Laurence, the Assumption, St Bartholomew, St Matthew, SS.
Simon and Jude, All Saints, St Andrew, St Thomas, and Christmas
Day. It is ordered that in Lent the principal meal be not taken
until sunset, on other fasting-days about three P.M. The faithful
are further recommended not to prepare meat on fasting or absti
nence days for Protestants who chance to visit them.— TRANSLATOR.
tion.
STATUTES OF BISHOP NICOLSON. 173
many others — to be subjected to public penance, statuta
„. Missionis
3. I hose not yet confirmed are to be prepared (1700).
with all due care for the reception of this sacra
ment. Tenth title: of the Holy Eucharist. 1. 10. ofthe
• • Holy Eu-
Although under existing circumstances the sacred charfst.
species cannot reverently be reserved for any
length of time, yet should the viaticum be re
quired for the sick on a day on which the priest
cannot celebrate, reservation may be allowed with
all due precautions. 2. Those who seek recon
ciliation with the Church on their death -beds
must not be hastily admitted to Holy Com
munion, unless they show some sign of under
standing the Catholic doctrine as to this mystery.
3. Converts are not to be permitted to assist at
mass until after they have made their profession
of faith ; and public sinners are to be excluded
from the holy mysteries as long as they refuse
to amend. 4. Priests may be permitted to dupli
cate in cases of necessity, and with proper autho
rity. 5. Pastors are to be careful with regard
to the cleanliness of vestments, altar-linen, and
sacred vessels. Eleventh title: of penance. 1. 11. ofpen-
The absolution of habitual sinners is to be de
ferred until they show sign of amendment. 2.
No one is to be absolved who does not know the
Our Father, the Creed, and the commandments
of God and the Church. 3. The clergy, both
secular and regular, are to be cautious as to
giving absolution to penitents who are not mem-
174 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
statuta bers of their own flock. 4. Notorious sinners are
Missionis
(1700). to be exhorted to confess their sins at the bemn-
O
ning of Lent, and so prepare to receive Holy
12. of ma,- Communion at Easter. Tivclfth title : of matri-
trimony. __ „ .
mony. 1 . JN o priest is to officiate at the marriage
of two heretics. 2. In the case of mixed mar
riages, the Catholic party must endeavour to
induce the other to embrace the true faith ; and
if the wife be a Catholic, she must try to obtain
her husband's consent to their children being-
brought up Catholics. 3. Matrimony is to be
preceded by confession, in the case of those who
are in mortal sin. 4. Catholics who are married
only by a Protestant minister are to do public pen
ance ; and the Protestant rite is forbidden, even
if they have already been married in the Catholic
Church. 5. As far as circumstances permit, the
banns are always to be published before marriage.
13. Of Thirteenth title : of usury. Usury — that is,
usury. . .
the demanding of exorbitant interest on loans —
is unlawful, and the faithful are to be cautioned
against such practices.1
Founiia- The vicariate of Bishop Nicolson was signalised
tiou of a
seminary by the foundation, about the year 1712, of the
at Scalau J *
(1712)> little seminary of Scalan, in the Braes of Glen-
livat. In this secluded spot, accessible only by
1 The above summary has been somewhat enlarged from that in
the German text, and gives the substance of the whole of the
Statuta. It has consequently not been thought necessary to print
in full the very lengthy Latin original, which the author has given
in the Appendix to vol. ii. — TRANSLATOR.
SEMINARIES AT SCALAN AND RATISBOX. 175
a bridle - path, " hardly known but to a few
shepherds, or to the wandering sportsman," 1 was
planted the humble seat of learning, in which
many excellent priests and more than one bishop
were to receive their early training for the mis
sionary life. Meanwhile, in distant Ratisbon, ami at
Abbot Placid Fleming, the zealous and devoted
superior of the Scottish Abbey of St James, had
been exerting himself to foster the missionary
zeal of his community, and to establish within
his walls a seminary for the education of Scottish
priests.2 As early as 1697 he had petitioned the
Holy See that the first vacant benefice in his gift
might be bestowed on the new institution ; 3 and
we find a subsequent petition for a grant in aid
of the seminary referred by Innocent XII. to
Propaganda, on April 6, 1699. The Congrega
tion in March 1701 assigned a sum of money
in support of St James's, and the nuncio at
Cologne was at the same time instructed to
recommend the case to the Elector.4 By the
year 1718 Mgr. Caraffa, Archbishop of Larissa
and secretary to Propaganda, was able to present
a report from Abbot Fleming, from which it ap-
1 Chambers, Domestic Annals of Scotland, vol. iii. p. 205.
- The Liber Benefactorum (Fort- Augustus MS.) of the Abbey of
St James contains a duplicate of the letter of the Bishop of Eatisbon,
approving the foundation of the seminary. It is dated November
24, 1681. Abbot Fleming's administration lasted from 1672 to 1720.
—TRANSLATOR.
3 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 184 : ann. 1697.
4 Ibid,, 6 April. 1699, fol. 59 ; 8 Martii 1701.
176 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
pearecl that eighteen Scottish youths were being
educated in the new seminary, that the Bishop
Benefac- of Eichstadt had assigned to it a yearly endow -
tionstotlie J
seminary at meiit of a thousand florins, with a promise of
Ratisbon.
twenty thousand at his death,1 that the Duke
of Bavaria had contributed sixteen thousand
florins,2 and the coadjutor -Bishop of Eichstadt
had built a house for the seminarists.3 At a
session of Propaganda held on April 22, 1720,
the statutes of the seminary were approved, sub
ject to a modification of the missionary oath.4
Unfortunately, owing to mismanagement of the
1 Besides the above-mentioned donations, the Liber Benefactorum
records the gift from the same generous prelate, " ex liberalissima
sua munificentia, et in nos Scotos exules pietate," of eight lesser
iron stoves for the cells of the senior priests ; item, one large one for
the new refectory, anno 1721. The bishop presented the com
munity at different times with no less than twenty such stoves,
" four adorned with the image of Christ crucified," and the remain
ing sixteen with his own arms. — Fort-Augustus MS. — TRANSLATOR.
2 The Duke also founded eight burses in the seminary, and
assigned to it an annual endowment of eight hundred florins. — Lib.
Benefact. — TRANSLATOR.
3 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 601, 15 Nov. 1718. Rescript.
" Laudandus et ad Dnum- Secretarium cum Sanctissimo." Ibid.,
" Si spediscano brevi di rendimento di grazie a detti Principi."
4 Ibid., fol. 239, 22 April ] 738. The words added to the oath
were : " Atque ibi [in Scotia] permanere, ita tamen, ut donee in
missione permansero in omnibus missionis exercitium concernenti-
bus Vicario Apostolico ipsius Eegni Scotice seii alterius pro tempore
subjectus manere debeam." The original form of the oath, as first
taken by the community of St James's, on September 11, 1719, is
extant in a contemporary document (Fort- Augustus MS.) It con
tains no mention of subjection to the bishop in Scotland ; but the
words " sub obedientia et directione vicarii apostolici quoad exer-
citia missionis " are inserted in another and a later handwriting.
— TRANSLATOR.
VISITATION OF THE HIGHLANDS, 1701. 177
property, and to the refusal of the subsequent
Bishops of Eichstadt to continue their pecuniary
support, the progress and usefulness of the insti
tution became seriously impaired ; and we find
the abbot in April 1752 making grievous com
plaint to Propaganda of its necessitous condition,
and declaring the continuance of the work impos
sible unless the Batisbon missionaries were to
receive from the Congregation a like subsidy with
the rest of the clergy.1 Twenty years later the
Scotch bishops appear to have expressed to the
Holy See their dissatisfaction with the Abbot of
Hatisbon, who neither sent them any help, nor
even any reply to their letters.2
In 1701 Bishop Nicolson made a visitation of Episcopal
the Highlands arid Islands, where he confirmed of the
Highlands
no less than three thousand persons. Five years (1701).
later he visited Braemar for the first time, taking
advantage of the absence of Lord Mar, who was
far from friendly to the Catholics. The faithful
1 A translation of the abbot's letter will be found in Appendix IX.
2 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scritture rifer. III. " Ab eo [Ratisbonse
Benedictinorum Patre Abbate] autem non solum nihil adhuc
auxilii, sed ne responsum quidem ullum accepimus." It must not
be supposed from the above that the foundation of good Abbot
Fleming was followed by no good results for the Church in Scotland.
" From its commencement until 1848," writes Bishop Forbes, " 126
young Scotsmen were educated in it. Thirty of these appear to
have become monks, and about ten were ordained as secular priests
for the Scottish mission." — Edinburgh Review, No. 243, p. 181, note.
In the Catalogues Alumnorum of the seminary (Fort- Augustus MS.)
are inscribed many names belonging to the oldest and most illus
trious families of Scotland. — TRANSLATOR.
VOL. IV. M
178 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
in this district numbered some five hundred, who
were ministered to by fathers of the Society of
Jesus. The preservation of the faith through
the storms of the Reformation and subsequent
revolutions was attributed by the people them
selves to the circumstance that the Church had
held no possessions there, and that consequently
no one had been tempted to make himself master
of ecclesiastical property under the pretext of
embracing the pure Gospel. More than all, the
parish priest at the time of the Reformation,
whose name was Owen, had not, like so many
others, fled before the tempest, but had remained
faithful at his post.1 The year following his visit
to Braemar, the bishop thought it desirable, at a
New aivi- general meeting of the clergy, to arrange a new
missions, division of the country into districts ; there being
at this time, as it appeared, thirty-six priests on
the Scottish mission, including fifteen seculars,
eleven Jesuits, five Franciscans, four Benedictines,
and one Augustinian.
Proposed With the object of drawing closer the bonds
erection of . ...
a chapter that united the Scottish missionary clergy, Bishop
iaiui(i704). Nicolson in 1704 laid before Propaganda, through
his procurator, a proposal for the erection of a
capitular body. It was to consist of members of
the secular clergy only, on whom, on the death
of the bishop, or ordinary of Scotland (as he was
to be styled), was to devolve the episcopal juris-
1 Gordon, iScotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 2.
COADJUTOR-BISHOP APPOINTED, 1705. 179
diction. This proposal did not find favour with
the Holy See, and reference was made in the
reply to the former uncanonical erection of the
English chapter, and the inconveniences to which
it had given rise. The Congregation, however,
was desirous of affording relief to the bishop by
other means — namely, by recommending to the
Pope the appointment of a coadjutor.1 George
Adamson, who was at first nominated, declined
the charge owing to ill health, and the choice
then fell upon James Gordon. In a letter dated
November 18, 1705, thanking the Holy See for James
T-> • -i T . Gordon as
this appointment, Bishop Nicolson reported num- coadjutor-
bishop,
erous conversions among the poorer classes, and 1705-
mentioned the recent banishment of two of his
clergy — one a secular priest, and the other a
Benedictine.2
By the appointment of his coadjutor, the vicar-
apostolic found his labours materially lightened.
The new prelate, born in Banffshire about 1664,
was educated in the Scotch College at Paris, and
immediately after his ordination, in 1692, came
to the mission in Scotland, where he laboured in
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 294, 22 Sept. 1704. The petition
ran thus : " Che si riduca canonicamente all' essere di capitolo, 6
altro corpo e communita legittimo quel clero secolare, sopponendo
che in tal forma alia morte di quel Vescovo e Vicario Apostolico,
1'ordinaria giurisdizione si devolvera de jure communi a quel capi
tolo." llescrib. " Supplicandum Sanctissimo pro deputatione Coad-
jutoris Vicario Apostolico Scotiae, et cum futura successione cum
characters episcopali in partibus infidelium."
'-' Ibid., fol. 18, 1705.
180 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
his native district for ten years. In 1702, he was
sent to Rome as assistant to William Leslie, the
Scottish agent, and while there was selected as
coadjutor to Bishop Nicolson. At the desire of
Pope Clement XL, he was consecrated quietly
at Montefiascone by Cardinal Barbarigo, and a
few months later returned to Scotland, visiting,
on his way through Paris, the exiled Royal
Bishop Family of England. Bishop Gordon lost no
Gordon . . . . ? • i •
in the time in beginning to exercise his pastoral lunc-
Highlands
<170')- tions, and in 1707 he made his first visitation
of the Highlands and Islands, accompanied by
a Gaelic -speaking deacon, who acted as the
bishop's interpreter in those districts where the
English language was unknown.1 From the
episcopal report, presented to Propaganda by
Mgr. Cavalieri on September 3, 1708, it appears
that in the course of the visitation 2740 persons
were confirmed, many abuses were rectified, salu
tary exhortations given to the missionaries, one
school opened, and steps taken for the inaugura
tion of another. The work could be performed
only at the cost of difficulties and privations of
all kinds, including insufficiency of food and perils
from tempestuous weather ; and the Congrega
tion, in replying to the report, referred in terms
1 Before the close of the visitation, the young deacon, whose
name was Dalglish or Douglas, was ordained priest at Scothouse, in
Kiioydart. The incident is worth noting, as the first recorded ordi
nation which had taken place in Scotland since the Reformation. —
TRANSLATOR.
DEATH OF BISHOP NICOLSON, 1718. 181
of high commendation to the apostolic labours of
the bishop and his companions.1
The zealous support and co-operation of Bishop
Gordon were of special service to the vicar-apos
tolic during the stormy days of the first Jacobite
rising. Writing to Propaganda in the last days
of the eventful year 1715, the coadjutor described,
in graphic terms, how Bishop Nicolson and the
priest who resided with him had been actually
captured by the authorities, but had providen
tially escaped ; how the preachers were straining
every nerve to hound down the unfortunate
Catholics ; and how the missionaries not only
stood firm themselves in the midst of the tem
pest, but were even reconciling many wanderers
to the Church. Bishop Nicolson did not long
survive this fresh outburst of persecution.2 On
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 550, 3 Sept. 1708. " Dice d'aver
cresimati 2740 cattolici, levato multi abusi, e dato ordini salntari a
quei sacerdoti missionarii, de' quali si loda. . . . Dice haver patiti
grandissimi incomodi, etc." Rescrib. " Laudamus summopere."
2 British Mus., Addit. MSS., 20,311. Papers of Card. Gualterio,
fol. 379. Jacobus Gordonus, Episcopus coadjutor ad Emos- Cardi-
nales Congnis- de Prop. Fid. Edinburg., 3 Kal. Dec. 1716. " Grave
admodum nobis fuit et multa niateria doloris, quod tarn diuturno
tempore non licuerit literas dare. . . . Captus fuit ineunte Martio
Peristachiensis [i.e., Episcopus Nicolson], simul cum sacerdote, qui
ut plurimum cum illo commoratur, sed singulari Dei providentia
elapsi sunt ambo. In multis aliis locis insidise sacerdotibus posit*
fuerunt et ipsi diligenter investigati, laici etiam quandoque illorum
vice comprehensi sunt, et ad carceres tracti, et plerique fideles laici
in domibus suis tuti non sunt, et jam exulare ant errabundi vagare
coguntur. Tantus est ministrorum Presbyterianorum furor, ut
Catholicos quiescere nunquam sinant, sed insidiosis et falsis querelis
Magistratus in illos continuo concitent, aut severissimis iteratisque
182 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
Death of October 23, 1718, he closed his laborious and
Bishop
Nicoison fruitful life at Preshome, in Banffshire, where his
(1718).
declining years had been chiefly spent. The in
scription on his monument, written by his faithful
coadjutor, testifies to the learning, charity, and
virtue of the deceased prelate, and bears out the
opinion universally entertained by the clergy of
the Scottish mission, who, in a report addressed
to Propaganda in 1702, had borne unanimous
witness to the bishop's apostolic zeal and pastoral
vigilance, and to the solicitude, mingled with
prudence, with which he exhorted, instructed,
consoled, and animated his flock.1 Bishop Gor
don wrote to announce the death of the vicar-
apostolic to the Congregation, who, in turn,
assured him of their protection, and assigned to
him an annual grant of two hundred scudi, and
faculties for dispensing in matrimonial cases
within the second degree.2
Like his predecessor, Bishop Gordon soon found
persecutionibus infestent. Missionarii tamen omnes vel stationes
suas servant, vel non procul abscedunt, a divinis obeundis officiis
non desistunt et missionem se non deserturos . . . pollicentur, et
quod mirandum, hseretici aliqui per sacerdotum operam fidem
complectuntur : pauci quidem, sed fide prajstantes, dum nihil aliud
meditantur adversarii, quam ut nos fidemque nostram ex hoc regno
radicitus ac subito eliminent."
1 The epitaph is printed by Gordon, Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 2.
Cf. Archiv. Propag., Scritture rifer. II., 12 Aug. 1712. " Prsesentia
nimirum et insignis Illmi- Episcopi, Vicarii Apostolici zelus et vigil-
antia pastoralis, atque conjuncta cum summa solicitudine prudentia,
qui humeris suis omnium onera sustentans, undique circumeundo
hos hortatur, hos instruit, alios solatur, alios confirmat."
2 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 132, 9 Novemb. 1718.
APPOINTMENT OF BISHOP WALLACE, 1720. 183
the need of a coadjutor to assist him in his labo
rious duties ; and his choice fell upon John Wai- N
lace, a native of Arbroath, and son of the provost Bishop
John
of that town. Wallace had been brought up a Wallace.
Protestant, and had officiated for some time as
an Episcopalian minister ; but on his conversion
to Catholicism, which took place probably before
the Revolution, he was appointed tutor to the
children of the Duke of Perth, and travelled
with them in France and Italy. Bishop Gordon
brought Wallace back with him in 1706 from
Paris to Scotland, where he was ordained two
years later, and stationed on the mission at
Arbroath. He was summoned before the Justi- Wallace
. _ before the
ciary Court at Perth in 1709, on the charge 01 Justiciary
. . . . ... Cotlrt-
" apostatizing to the Popish religion"; but failing
to appear, was outlawed.1 The zeal and success
with which Wallace prosecuted his missionary
labours recommended him to Bishop Gordon, on
the death of Nicolson, as a fitting coadjutor to
himself. James III. wrote in his favour to Car
dinal Sacripanti, who, on the death of Cardinal
Howard, had been appointed by Clement XI.
protector of Scotland ; 2 while the bishop himself
1 Gordon, ficotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 6.
2 British Mus., Papers of Card. Gualterio. Letters of James III.
(1707-1728), 20,292, fol. 222. To Cardinal Sacripanti. " J'ay
receu une lettre de Mr 1'Eveque Gordon, Vicaire Apostolique
d'Ecosse, dans laquelle il m'informe qu'il vous a recommande un
tres digne sujet, le sieur Jean Wallace, pretre et ancien missionaire
en Ecosse, pour etre son Coadjuteur, en cas que S.S. juge k propos
de lui accorder cette consolation. . . . Ainsi je vous ecris cette
184 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
Apostolic
zeal of
Bishop
Gordon.
proposed his name to the Congregation of Pro
paganda. On April 8, 1720, he was nominated
Bishop of Cyrrha, and six months later he was
privately consecrated in Edinburgh by Bishop
Gordon, assisted by two priests. The circum
stances of his apprehension and imprisonment in
1722 have already been alluded to. He was
obliged in consequence to keep himself in the
background, and to confine his ministrations to
districts where he was little known ; and, more
over, he was already of an age which incapacitated
him from the performance of any very active or
laborious duties.
The chief burden of the administration of the
Scottish mission thus remained on the shoulders
of Bishop Gordon ; and we may gather, from the
reports which he transmitted from time to time
lettre pour joindre ma recommandation avec celle de 1'Eveque en
faveur du dit Sieur Wallace, qui m'est personellement connu pour
un tres-pieux pretre, egalement humble et s£avant, et centre qui il
ne peut pas y avoir la moindre exception."
From another letter addressed by James to the Cardinal (fol.
104), it would seem that he had also a voice in the appointment of
the Irish bishops. " Mon cousin," it begins, " Aiant recu il y a
quelque temps une lettre de Mr 1'Internonce de Bruxelles, par la
quelle il me sollicite extz-emement de nommer aux Eveches vacantes
d'Irlande." The Pretender was likewise accorded by Clement XII.
the privilege of nominating a cardinal. " Facultatem eidem [Jacobo]
concessit nominandi aliquem ad cardinalatum, ut in hoc cseteris
Regibus exsequaretur." — Commentarius de vita ac rebus gestis de
mentis XII., p. 80. James made use of the privilege once, in re
commending for the cardinalate Gue"rin de Tencin, Archbishop of
Embrun, 1724-1739, and afterwards of Lyons, 1740-1758 (ibid., p.
147) — the same who, in 1727, convoked the celebrated council of
Embrun. See Collectio Concilior. Lacens., vol. i. pp. 617-630.
POPULAR HOSTILITY TO CATHOLICS. 185
to the Holy See, with what zeal and fidelity he
fulfilled his office. In a joint letter addressed to
Propaganda by the bishop and his coadjutor in
October 1723, the writers dwell on the untiring
efforts which the ministers were making to sup
press the ancient faith, and the constant activity
which they displayed, even in the remotest parts
of the country, in stirring up popular feeling popular
fCGlillff
against the Catholics. Their hostility was espe- against
J Catholics.
cially directed against Catholic schools. Laws
had recently been enacted which, ostensibly aimed
at the pretensions of James III. to the throne of
Great Britain, declared in reality war to the death
against religion, by imposing on Catholics the
alternative either of apostasy or of utter ruin.
The bishops express their surprise at the indiffer
ence manifested by Catholic princes at this junc
ture, contrasting it with the promptness shown
by Protestant monarchs in resenting the slightest
encroachment on the freedom of their co-religion
ists ; and the Pope is entreated to cause fitting
representations on the subject to be made by the
nuncios at the Catholic courts. In spite of all,
the clergy and faithful remain staunch and con- staunch
ness of
stant to their religion: "nay," add the writers, clergy ami
* laity to the
" such is the strength of faith and firmness dis- faith-
played by the laity, that we know of hardly one
in all Scotland who has abandoned the faith, ex
cepting a few in one small island, the Protestant
proprietor of which has used every kind of force
186 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
and cunning in order to deceive and overthrow
a certain number of converts, hardly as yet
grounded in their religion." To Bishop Wallace
had been assigned the charge of the Lowlands,
while Bishop Gordon in 1722 made a second visi
tation of the Highlands and Islands, confirming
some 2600 persons, among whom were many con
verts and persons of position. He visited on this
occasion some districts where no bishop had ever
set foot before him ; and where, besides adminis
tering the sacraments, he sought to console the
faithful in their afflictions, and, where he found it
requisite, to restore peace that had been broken.1
Renewed During the next few years the persecution
persecu- . m
tion of directed against the Catholics of Scotland appears
Catholics.
to have been especially virulent in the Highland
districts. In another joint report addressed to
Propaganda in August 1726, the original of which
has been unfortunately lost, but of which an
Italian translation, drawn up three months later,
is preserved in the archives of the Congregation,
the bishops give some details of the campaign
carried on by the ministers against the Highland
TheChurch Catholics.2 The progress of the Church in the
in the
Highlands, north was opposed with the utmost vigour by the
preachers, who organised bands of soldiers with the
object of apprehending and throwing into prison
the missionaries and their converts. The faithful,
1 See Appendix X.
- An English version is given in Appendix XI.
APPOINTMENT OF A HIGHLAND BISHOP. 187
notwithstanding these trials, continued steadfast
in the faith, supported by their bishops, who left
nothing undone to console and encourage them.
o o
Both prelates, however, were now advanced in
years, and were unable to prosecute with the
same vigour as formerly the arduous duties of
their office ; while their want of acquaintance with
the Gaelic tongue greatly hampered their minis
trations in the Highlands. In order to remedy
these evils, the bishops now brought forward a
proposal for the division of Scotland into two Proposed
division of
vicariates, the Highland and the Lowland dis- Scotland
into two
tricts ; recommending at the same time for the
apostolic.
northern vicariate Mr Alexander Grant, who had
publicly defended the bull Unigenitus in the Ro
man College with much applause, and had shown
himself for the past seven years a zealous and
successful missioner. The selection was approved
by Propaganda in a congregation held on Decem
ber 17, 1726, and was ratified by Pope Benedict
XIII. on July 27 of the following year.1
The new bishop-designate, who was residing Alexander
T> i Grant,
in Home, resolutely declined to accept the pro- Mshop-
m designate
posed dignity ; and his reluctance could hardly for the
J J Highlands.
be overcome by the most pressing representations
from the vicar-apostolic. The latter, writing to
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 455, 17 Decemb. 1726. Rescrib.
"Ad mentem, mens est, quod supplicetur Sanctissimo juxta petita."
" Die 27 Julii 1727, Sanctissimus ammit." Brady (Episcopal Suc
cession, vol. iii. pp. 463, 464) gives the latter date as July 23. —
TRANSLATOR.
188 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
Eome in January 1728, mentions that he had
employed all his powers of persuasion to induce
Mr Grant to consent to the appointment.1 At
length he agreed to accept it, and set out for
Scotland, whither the necessary brief was to be
despatched after him. He only, however, got
as far as Genoa,2 where he fell sick, and from
thenceforward nothing more is known of him.
"Whether," says one account, " he retired into a
pearance. •>
monastery, or whether, as was thought more prob
able, he perished unknown in a public hospital,
could never be ascertained."3 After the lapse of
more than two years, the bishops renewed their
former application, proposing Hugh Macdonald
for the Highland vicariate, and entreating his
speedy appointment, on account of the great
danger to religion in these parts, owing to the
multiplication of ministers and heretical schools.
The writers in the same letter relate that Catho
lics are in some districts compelled by force, and
even with blows, to attend the Protestant ser
vice ; 4 and complain bitterly of the crying need
1 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scritture riferite, Jan. 11, 1728.
2 Or, according to another authority, Marseilles. Brady (op. cit.,
p. 464), quotes a letter written at this time by Mr Grant to the
Scotch agent in Eome, and adds that Propaganda sent 36 scudi to
relieve his immediate wants, but received tidings of his death shortly
afterwards. — TRANSLATOR.
3 Gordon, Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 5.
4 See Appendix XII. There is a story, well known in the High
lands, of one of the Macleans of Coll, who was himself an elder of
the Kirk, and was reproved by the General Assembly for suffering
his islanders to remain in the darkness of Popery. The laird ac-
BISHOP HUGH MACDONALD. 189
there is of more missionaries, for whom, however,
they find it impossible to provide even the bare
means of subsistence. The report of the bishops
was presented to Propaganda by Mgr. Fortiguerra,
the secretary, on January 15, 1731 : the proposals
therein made were approved, and the nomination
of Hugh Macdonald was duly made, with the pro- Hugh Mac-
mise of a grant of the necessary sacred vessels.1 first HJgh-
land vicar -
ihe new prelate was a son of the laird of Morar, apostolic.
in the West Highlands, and had been educated
at the seminary of Scalan. He also studied for a
time at Paris, previous to his appointment as
Bishop of Diana in partibus ; and in October
1731 he was consecrated at Edinburgh by Bishop
Gordon, assisted by Bishop Wallace and a priest.
It was on this occasion that the partition of the
country was finally agreed on, the Highland vi-
cariate to include the northern and western dis
tricts, together with the islands, while the south
ern parts were assigned to the Lowland vicariate.
cordingly posted himself on Sunday morning at a convenient spot,
where two roads led respectively to kirk and chapel, and pro
ceeded to knock down with his yellow cane any one whom he saw
making his way to the latter. Hence Presbyterianism was known
by the name of Creidimh a bhata bkui, the creed of the yellow stick !
— TRANSLATOR.
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 6, 5 Jan. 1731. Ibid., Scritture
riferite II., 17 Sept. 1730. James III. wrote under this date to
Pope Clement, to the effect that as Bishop Gordon " senecta et frac-
tis poene viribus, non animo se sed corpore imparem obeundis visita-
tionibus et tolerandte itinerum asperitati ultro agnoscat," he recom
mends to the Pope " Hugonem Macdonnel coadjutorem EpPj- partium
Occidentalium Regni nostri."
190 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
The arrangement was sanctioned by a decree of
Propaganda, dated January 7, 1732, Bishop Gor
don having already in a pastoral letter informed
the Highland Catholics of the appointment of
their new bishop. The latter forwarded his first
report to the Holy See on March 20, 1732 ;l and
a year later the Congregation, in view of the in
creasing needs of the mission in Scotland, assigned
to it an annual grant of five hundred scudi.2
Second It was during the vicariate of Bishop Mac-
rising donald that occurred the ill-fated rising of Charles
(1745).
Edward Stuart. In the rash hope of recovering
the inheritance of his fathers, the prince landed,
in July 1745, on the coast of Lorn. The bishop
was on his return homewards from a conference
Bishop of the vicars-apostolic at Edinburgh, when he
andChariea heard the news of Charles's arrival in Scotland.
Edward. r> i T •
He could not but disapprove of the expedition
under the circumstances, for he knew that 110
sufficient preparations had been made to carry
it to a successful issue. The prince showed no
inclination to follow the advice of the bishop,
who counselled him for the present to return to
France ; 3 and the latter could hardly do other
wise than associate himself with the unanimous
1 See Appendix XIII.
2 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 21, 7 Januar. 1732. " Reap. Annue-
runt in omnibus." Ibid., 1733 Acta, fol. 18.
3 Geddes, The Position of Scottish Catholics after Culloden, p. 4.
" The bishop candidly told him that the country was not prepared
for his reception."
COLLAPSE OF THE JACOBITE CAUSE. 191
action of his people. The Catholic Highlanders
rallied to a man round the prince, and carried
him in triumph to Edinburgh, where he passed
the winter in preparing for his campaign against
England. Bishop Macdonald meanwhile solemnly
blessed the royal standard at Glenfinnan, and Blessing of
appointed a number of his clergy to act as chap- standard.
lains to the prince's army. Fortune, however,
smiled but very briefly on Charles's hopes. One
victory, indeed, he gained over the English troops
at Prestonpans ; but in the following April (1746)
was fought the bloody battle of Culloden, which
dashed to the ground for ever the claims of the collapse
Stuart princes to the throne of their ancestors. Jacobites.
Charles himself with difficulty escaped capture,
and made his way by circuitous and unfrequented
mountain-roads to the coast.
The hopes of the Stuarts having been thus
finally annihilated, Benedict Henry, second son Benedict
of James III., who had been born and educated Cardinal
-p. of York.
in Home, resolved to embrace the ecclesiastical
state; and in a consistory held on July 3, 1747,
he was named Cardinal-deacon by Benedict XIV.1
Thus the last scion of his illustrious race ended
his days in the service of the Church. " If we
reflect," writes the biographer of the Counts of
Albany, "more than half a century after the
death of the last of the Stuarts, on the subse
quent course of events, and the melancholy fate
1 Cardella, Memorie Storiche, vol. ix. p. 39.
192 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
of so many reigning houses, we cannot but see
the hand of God in the lot of the last scion of a
race which, more than any other royal line, had
suffered under the blows of continual misfortune.
After centuries of stormy political existence, the
tranquil but sublime majesty of the Church threw
over the closing days of the Stuarts a mild and
gentle radiance, like that of the setting sun."
sufferings The results of the battle of Culloden, in which,
as has been truly observed, " the Hanoverian army
aftercS- and the Duke of Cumberland displayed a bar
barity which recalled the memory of Sedgemoor
and of the Bloody Assize," 2 whatever they may
have been for the Scottish people at large, were
in the highest degree calamitous to the unfor
tunate Catholics. More than a thousand persons
were transported to America, the Highland clans
were decimated and dispersed, Catholic chapels
destroyed, the seminary at Scalan plundered and
burned, missals and vestments publicly committed
to the flames, and priests and people persecuted
with merciless rigour.3 With the desire of miti
gating these evils, Benedict XIV. urged Charles
Emmanuel III., King of Sardinia, to intercede
with the English Government, through his am
bassador in London, on behalf of the distressed
Catholics of Scotland.4 The vigilance of the
1 Von Eeumont, Die Griijin von Albany, vol. i. p. 10 et seq.
2 Lecky, Hist, of England in the Eighteenth Century, vol. i. p. 423.
3 Geddes, Scottish Catholics after Culloden, pp. 8-12.
4 Carutti, Storia del Regno di Carlo Emmanuele III. (1859), vol.
IMPEISONMENT OF BISHOP MACDONALD. 193
authorities was especially directed against Bishop
Macdonald, whose intimate relations with the
disaffected clans were of course well known. In
order to escape capture, he thought it well to
retire for a time to Paris, and it was not until
1749 that he returned to Scotland. Through
o
the instrumentality of the sister of the laird of
Leuchars he obtained a safe-conduct under the
pseudonym of Mr Brown, and was thus enabled
to continue to exercise his ministrations in the
Highlands for several years. From a report
which he sent to Propaganda, in conjunction
with his episcopal brethren, in November 1755,
we learn that he had been that year apprehend-
ed by the agents of the Government, and only trial of
J Bishop
released from prison on giving bail for a heavy Mac
sum.1 Early in 1756, his trial took place before
ii. p. 58. " Nel 1746, dopo la discesa di Carlo Edoardo in Iscozia,
il re, per intercessione del papa, introdusse uffici in favore dei
cattolici."
In connection with Benedict XIV., we may record here the
singular circumstances attending the conversion to Catholicism,
about this time, of Andrew, a scion of the ducal house of Gordon.
Born in Paris in 1717, he was educated in England, after his father's
death, as a Protestant. In 1755 he visited Eome, and together
with his attendants, sought an audience of Pope Benedict, with the
sole object of turning into ridicule the ceremonial of reception.
So deeply, however, was he impressed by the venerable aspect of
the Pontiff, that when the latter inquired what he sought of him,
he exclaimed : " Holy Father, I ask for a priest, to instruct me in
the Catholic religion." He was received into the Church the same
year, and brought up his children in the Catholic faith. He died
in 1761. See Raess, Die Convertiten seit der Reformation, vol. x.
p. 217.
1 See Appendix XIV.
VOL. IV. N
194 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
the High Court of Justiciary at Edinburgh ; and on
March 1, in punishment for his refusal to "purge
himself of Popery," he was sentenced to banish
ment for life, under pain of death if he presumed
to return to Scotland.1 Probably, however, with
the connivance of the authorities, this severe
sentence was never enforced ; and the bishop
continued to discharge his pastoral functions in
the Highlands until his death, which took place
on March 12, 1773.
vicariate The Lowland vicariate was meanwhile admin-
lands. ' istered by Bishop Gordon, to whom, after the
death of Bishop Wallace, the Congregation of
Propaganda appointed a coadjutor, in 1735,
Alexander in the person of Alexander Smith. The new
Smith . „ -p, , ,
appointed prelate, who was a native ol fochabers, in
Morayshire, had entered the Scotch College in
Paris in 1698, was ordained priest in 1712, and
served on the mission until 1718, when he became
procurator at Paris, an office which he held for
twelve years. On September 19, 1735, he was
named, on the petition of Bishop Gordon, Bishop
of Misinopolis and coadjutor of the Lowland
1 From a contemporary report of the trial (Scots Magazine, Feb.
1756) it appears that it was pleaded in defence that no mention was
made of bishops in the penal statutes, but only of priests. The
decision of the Court, however, was that " as bishops could create
priests, they must be understood to be comprehended in the Act."
It will be remembered that a precisely similar plea was urged on
behalf of the Bishop of Lincoln, charged (1889) with violating the
Act of Uniformity by the use of unauthorised ritual in the Com
munion Service. — TRANSLATOR.
DIVISIONS AMONG THE CLERGY. 195
district. He devoted considerable time and
labour to the compilation of two catechisms,
which at the instance of Cardinal Spinelli were
approved by the Holy Office in Eome on March
20, 1750. Bishop Gordon and his coadjutor
transmitted to Propaganda, in February 1743, a
report as to the state of the Scottish mission.1
The prelates, after referring at some length to
the dissensions which had unfortunately sprung Dissensions
up among the clergy, and the measures which clergy.
they had been compelled to take in consequence,
report the death of two excellent missionaries
named Drummond and Shand. Several conver
sions are said to have taken place ; but on the
whole there was a marked falling off in the Decline of
religious fervour of the faithful. The bishops fervour"
recall the extraordinary progress made by the
Church in the past, and attribute the present
remissness to the party spirit which prevailed
among the clergy, diminishing the respect in
which they were held, crippling their influence
for good, and tending to the disedification of
their flocks. The number of disaffected priests
was, it is true, but a small one ; but they, un
happily, left no means untried to discredit the
zealous and devoted missionaries, whom they
regarded as their opponents.
On the death of Bishop Gordon in 1746, his SoP°f
coadjutor, the Bishop of Misinopolis, became (1748)?
1 See Appendix XV.
196 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
vicar-apostolic of the Lowland district ; and we
find him rendering an account of his charge in a
report to Propaganda, dated December 13, 1747.1
Bishop Smith, who was animated with a zeal for
souls truly apostolic, and who, in consequence
of the flight of the vicar of the Highlands to
the Continent, was now the sole bishop in the
country, had visited all the missionary stations
in his district, and had been an eyewitness of
the miseries occasioned by the unsuccessful rising
of Charles Edward. Several priests were still in
prison, or detained in ships of war. The bishop
refers with sorrow to the internal divisions which
disturb the mission, while at the same time he
cannot refrain from expressing his opinion that
Scotch affairs had not of late received the same
attention as formerly at the hands of Propaganda.
Salutary With a view to the removal of prevalent abuses,
measures
proposed he begs the Congregation to strengthen, the
by Bishop & . f
Smith to authority of the vicars-apostolic, and also, in
ganda. consideration of his advanced age, to grant him
the assistance of a coadjutor. Some clue to the
irregularities to which the bishop refers in the
above report is afforded us by the minutes of
a session of Propaganda held on July 7, 1750.
Complaint had been made by Bishop Smith of
certain Jesuit fathers, who had shown themselves
unwilling to comply with the regulations of the
mission as regarded the administration of the
1 See Appendix XVI.
EFFECT OF THE PEKSECUTION OF 1750. 197
sacraments ; and the Congregation, in conse
quence, renewed the decree which had been
issued for England in October 1695, and had
been extended to Scotland some two years
later, and which declared the regular mission- Theregu-
i . . lar clergy
anes subject to the vicars-apostolic in all that and the
bishops.
concerned the cure of souls.1 The persecution of
1750 was also fraught with calamitous results to
the Scottish mission. The most strenuous efforts
were made, as Bishop Smith wrote to Rome in
November of that year, to hunt out the priests
and drag them before the tribunals, which as a
rule sentenced them to perpetual banishment ; as
we find it recorded in the case of William Grant,
a Benedictine, and several others. In conse
quence of this state of things many of the clergy
remained in concealment, while others renounced
their obedience to the vicar-apostolic, and refused
to expose themselves to the risks of the mission
ary life. The real origin of these evils was of
course to be sought in the violent opposition of
the ministers, who were untiring in their efforts
to stir up the authorities against the Catholic
missionaries.2 In a joint report sent to Propa-
1 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 188, 7 Julii 1750. " Rescrib. : Detur
Decretum, 27 Aug. 1697.
2 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 3, 19 Januar. 1751. The Secretary,
Mgr. Lercari, reported as follows from information supplied by
Bishop Grant : " 1. Guglielmo Grant, Benedettino, fu esiliato pel
solo motive di essere egli prete Eomano, condotto ai tribunali,
perchk ricus6 di sottoscrivere la formola di giuramento. . . . Fu
pagato ai medesimi [i.e., soldati] per la sola cattura del sopradetto
198 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
ganda by both the vicars-apostolic on November
1, 1753, we find very similar complaints.1 The
Jesuit Father Farquharson had been condemned
to imprisonment, from which he was only liber
ated on giving heavy bail : the same conditions
being exacted from another priest named Alex
ander Macdonald, who had been imprisoned under
the mistaken impression that he was the vicar-
apostolic of the Highlands. With a view of in
creasing the true sacerdotal spirit among the
clergy, the bishops express their desire to adopt
and observe the recently promulgated constitu
tion of Benedict XIV. The superior of the Scot
tish Jesuits had signified his concurrence with
this wish, and the prelates accordingly petitioned
for the extension of the decree to Scotland.2
James In order to assist Bishop Smith in his laborious
Grant, . . r .
coadjutor duties, a coadjutor was assigned to him in 1755
d£Trictd *n ^e Person °f James Grant, Bishop of Sinita.
Grant had been educated at the Scotch College
P. Grant la sonima di 60 scudi. 2. Che i sacerdoti e missionarii o
sono nascosti, o fuggiti altrove, e altri si ricusano di andare a quella
missione, contradicendo apertamente al Vicario Apostolico. L'altro
e che i soldati suddetti si vantano publicamente di estirpare in brevi
dal regno tutti i missionarii, ed i ministri eretici non cessano di
eccitare i magistri."
1 See Appendix XVII.
2 The Constitution was issued on May 13, 1753, and was entitled,
"Reguloe observandee in Anglicanis missionibus ab Apostolicis
Vicariis, necnon a Sacerdotibus Missionariis ssecularibus et regu-
laribus." It commences with the words Apostolicum Ministerium.
The text is printed by Brady, Episcopal Succession, vol. ii. pp. 496-
521.
BISHOP GRANT, COADJUTOR. 199
in Paris, and ordained priest in 1734, but before
returning to Scotland he studied for a year in
another Parisian seminary, which proved to be
strongly tainted with Jansenism.1 Shortly after
the battle of Culloden Mr Grant was apprehended
in one of the Western Isles and carried to Inver- His impri
sonment
ness, where he lay in prison for upwards of a at Inver-
year, being only released through the efforts of
his brother in May 1747. At the instance of
Bishop Smith, he was named, on February 21,
1755, Bishop of Sinita, and coadjutor of the Low
land district, and was consecrated by the same
prelate in Edinburgh in the following November.
The delay of nine months seems to have been due
to the singularly diffident character of the bishop-
elect, and to his extreme reluctance to undertake
the responsible duties of the episcopate. Bishops
Smith and Macdonald referred to the matter in
their report to Propaganda, dated November
1 That the future bishop had no sympathy with such ideas is
proved by the following anecdote (see Gordon, Scotichronicon, p. 11).
He was shown on one occasion a portrait of the notorious Quesnel,
inscribed as follows : —
" Hie ille est quern plena Deo tot scripta coronant,
Magnanimus veri vindex, morumque magister,
In quern cfeca suos dum vertit Roma furores
Labi visa fides et totus palluit orbis."
Mr Grant, when asked his opinion of these verses, produced the
following quatrain, as more appropriate, in his judgment, to the
subject of the painting : —
" Hie est plena malo qui daemone scripta recudit,
Agni in pelle lupus, Regique Deoque rebellis,
In quern sacra vigil dum fulmina Roma vibravit,
Vincit prisca fides, totusque amplectitur orbis."
200 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
1755, expressing at the same time their own
satisfaction at the appointment, in which they
recognised the finger of divine Providence.1
Party We have seen that the vicars-apostolic, in their
spirit
among the letters addressed to Propaganda, made frequent
Scottish
clergy, allusion to the party spirit unhappily rife among
the clergy at this time. The baleful influence of
Spread of Jansenism had, in fact, doubtless owing to the
Jansenistic .
ideas. intimate ecclesiastical connection between France
and Scotland, made itself felt in the latter
country at an early period. Bishop Nicolson,
in the code of statutes which he drew up in
1700 for the guidance of the Scottish mission,
had raised a warning voice against the errors of
the Bourignonites, who, under the mask of piety,
were seducing the faithful from Catholic truth.2
And as far back as 1703 we find the nuncio at
Paris informing Propaganda that a priest named
James Lines, recently arrived from Scotland, re
ported the active dissemination in that country
of the erroneous ideas of Antoinette Bourignon.3
O
Brief of The brief addressed by Pope Clement XI., on
XL e August IV, 1709, to the Catholics of Great
Magnitu- ,
dinem Britain and Ireland, leaves no room for doubt
2)aterna>.
1 See the bishops' report in Appendix XIV.
2 Statuta Episcopi Nicolson, Tit. i. No. 3. " Cupientes populi
nobis commissi animos communire adversus novos Bourignonitarum
errores hoc regno serpentes, hortamur omnes Presbyteros, ut sedulo
caveant ne venenatis istis dogmatis [sic] Fideles inficiantur, aut ad
fidem propensi fallaci pietatis specie a veritate suscipienda aver-
tantur." See ante, p. 169, note.
3 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 59, 27 Martii 1703.
JANSENISM IN SCOTLAND. 201
that Jansenistic ideas had been widely spread in
those islands.1 The Pope refers to the bull Vinea
Domini Sabaoth, in which he had finally con
demned this novel and dangerous teaching ; 2
and points out that the children of the Church,
with this document to guide them, should find it
an easy task to avoid the pitfalls of error. The
faithful are specially warned against the perusal
of erroneous writings, as well as against intimacy
with persons of suspected orthodoxy, and are ex
horted to be particularly cautious in the matter
of choosing their spiritual directors. The Pope,
in conclusion, makes sorrowful mention of cer
tain countries near to Britain, where not a few
of the clergy, under pretence of upholding a
stricter moral standard, are not afraid openly to
attack the supreme authority of the See of St
Peter.3
The extent to which the Jansenist errors had Formula
. i drawn up
continued to be propagated in Scotland since the
1 Bullar. Propag., Append, ad torn. i. p. 384. "dementis XI.
Breve Magnitudinem paternce, ad universes Christifideles in regnis
Anglia?, Scotise, et Hiberniaa existentibus."
-"Edidimus paulo ante constitutionem Nostram incipientem
' Vineam Domini Sabaoth,' qua detectis erroribus quibus hujusmodi
opiniones scatent, certam, absolutam, ac Sanctte Romanse Ecclesiae
Nostroque atque Apostolicpe Sedis judicio conformem sentiendi in
his quoestionibus normam fidelibus indiximus."
3 " Ac sane dolendum est, non deesse in regionibus quae Regnis
istis finitimae sunt, quosdem qui, quamvis catholicum nomen prae-
ferant, et clerical! militiae sint adscripti, immo etiam rigidioris
moralis professores haberi velint, supremam tamen Cathedrae Sancti
Petri auctoritatem palam impetere non vereantur."
202 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
vicars- commencement of the century is indicated by the
apostolic J *
(1733). fact that the vicars-apostolic in 1733 thought it
necessary to draw up a formula of religious belief,
which all the clergy were required to subscribe.
According to a report of Bishop Gordon, sub
mitted to Propaganda on March 29, 1734, by the
secretary, Mgr. Fortiguerra, a meeting of the
clergy of the Highland district had been held
in the previous June, at which special attention
was called to the need of requiring the subscrip
tion, on oath, of a formulary accepting the fam
ous constitution Unigenitus, and repudiating the
errors of Jansen and Quesnel. Bishop Gordon,
who was somewhat reluctant to take action
without the express mandate of the Holy See,
nevertheless yielded to the solicitations of the
clergy, and drew up the required document,
Subscribed which was subscribed by all present.1 A special
Highland incentive to him in deciding; to take this step
clergy.
was doubtless the fact that rumours had already
reached the ears of the Protestants regarding
supposed dissensions among the Catholic mission
aries. The bishop having submitted the formula
1 Arcliiv. Propag. Aeta, fol. 137, 29 Mart. 1734. " Un congresso
col nuovo Vicario Apostolico di quelle provincie, . . . e che in tal
occasione rnolti di quei sacerdoti fecero premurosa istanza ad
ambedue i Prelati, che dovessero astringere con rigoroso precetto
tutti i missionarii ad accettare e professare con giuramento la costi-
tuzione Unigenitus, ed altre costituzioni apostoliche, avendo dato
motivo a quest' istanza un sospetto concepito da essi, che piu d'uno
di quel clero fosse aderente agl' errori di Quesnel e Giansenio e
quelli di Bajo."
BRIEF OF CLEMENT XII., 1736. 203
to the Congregation of Propaganda,1 it received
the approbation of that body, and was after
wards incorporated in the brief relating to Jan- Brief as to
i i /~n -\T~TT Jansenism
senism, issued by Clement All. on bept ember (September
10, 1736.2 The latter document was published
at the advice of a particular congregation of
cardinals, specially summoned for the purpose,
the matter being brought forward by Mgr. de
Menti. Hitherto the vicars -apostolic had de
manded subscription to the formula only when
there was well-grounded suspicion of a leaning
towards the errors imported from France ; but
the brief of Clement XII. directed the bishops to
require every priest entering the mission, both
secular and regular — members of the Society of
Jesus not excepted — to subscribe the document,
and this in presence of the vicar-apostolic and
two witnesses. The formula in question, which
covered the various points of erroneous doctrine
which had been condemned since the time of
Pius V., was moreover extended to include also
a catechism of suspected Jansenistic tendencies,
which had appeared in 1725;3 and the Scottish
vicars-apostolic and the whole of their clergy
1 Archiv. Propag., loc. tit. " Eescribatur ad EmUI»- Protectorem,
qui suaviter moneat prsedictum Vicarium de nova forma ab ipso
confecta, quam citissirue ad S. Congrem- transmittat."
2 Bullar. Propag., torn. i. p. 240.
3 Catechism, or Abridgment of Christian Doctrine (1725). In
structions and prayers for children, with a Catechism for young
children (1724). Catechism for those that are more advanced in
years and knowledge (1724).
204 CATHOLIC CHUECH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
The Scotch
College at
Paris.
Commis
sion given
to the
French
nuncio.
were, by order of Clement XII., directed to sub
scribe it in its new form.1
From Germany there came about this time
very disquieting rumours as to the attitude of
the Scotch College in Paris towards the poisonous
doctrines which had so deeply infected the Church
of France. Writing to Propaganda on January
2, 1736, Abbot Bernard Stuart of Ratisbon spoke
of the " ravenous wolves in sheep's clothing," who,
under the pretext of restoring pure doctrine and
primitive discipline, were causing parties and
divisions among Catholics, and who branded
those of the clergy who had been educated in
Rome or Germany as lazy, stupid, and given up
to superstition.2 The result of these represen
tations was, that towards the end of 1736 the
nuncio at Paris was commissioned by the Sacred
Congregation to examine into and report on the
state of the Scotch College in that city. The
1 Bullar. Propag., loc. cit. " Huic autem ampliori formulae
utrumque Vicarium Apostolicum, coadjutorem omnesque et
singulos utriusque Vicariatus missionaries, qui pridem 1733 lubenti
animo subscripsere, iterum in uberius suse obedientiae et religion!
testimonium, atque ad majorem apud S. Congregationem pro-
merendam laudem subscribere debere iidem Emi- Patres de-
clararunt."
2 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scrittur. rifer. ii., ann. 1738. " Intra-
runt in Vineam Domini lupi rapaces sub ovinis pellibus, qui specie
purioris doctrinae et pristinae disciplinae paucos qui supersunt Catho-
licos in diversa studia et partes trahunt, atque ceteros, qui secum
non sentiunt, tamquam inertes, stupidos et superstitionibus deditos
spernunt et apud plebeos detrahunt, religiososque sacerdotes, immo
et eos qui Komse vel in Germania suam educationem habuerunt, ut
tales respiciunt."
LERCAKES REPORT OX JANSENISM. 205
document transmitted to Rome by Niccolo Ler-
cari, on March 4, 1737, in compliance with the
above charge, and preserved in the Vatican
archives among the acts of the French nunciature,
depicts in somewhat gloomy colours the spirit
which dominated the College, and throws, besides,
considerable light on the then condition of the
Church in Scotland.
Some time before the issue of the bull Report of
TT . . T . .... Lercari.
Umgemtus, writes -Lercari, a Jansemstic spirit
had pervaded the College ; and there was no The Scotch
evidence that it had decreased subsequent to accused of
, „, . PI i . Jansenism.
that event. I he superiors 01 the establishment
had, on the contrary, boldly appealed in 1718
to the decision of a future council ; and the
French clergy had in consequence withdrawn
the support which they had previously given to
the College. Among those who favoured the
erroneous doctrines were said to be Charles wiuteford,
Thomas
Innes.
Whiteford, procurator of the institution, Thomas and George
and George Innes, prefects of studies, and their
uncle, the former almoner of King James II.1
1 Thomas Innes went on the Scotch mission in 1698, but in 1701
was appointed prefect of studies at the College in Paris, holding
that office until 1727. He was succeeded by his nephew George.
From 1729 until his death in 1744, Father Innes devoted himself to
antiquarian research. His Critical Essay on the Ancient Inhabitants
of Scotland and Civil and Ecclesiastic History, reprinted by the
Spalding Club, are still considered works of standard value. [See
for a memoir of the author, and some remarks on his supposed
Jansenistic leanings, Historians of Scotland, vol. viii. ; preface to
Lines' Essay, by G. Grub, pp. xiii-xxx. — TRANSLATOR.]
206 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700 1760.
All these were known to be Jansenists ; and
although Whiteford may possibly have recanted,
yet his recantation was never published, albeit it
was clearly his duty to make public satisfaction.
And as neither George Innes, nor the actual
prefect of studies, Alexander Gordon, had openly
professed their adherence to the Papal constitu
tion, their justificatory letters addressed to the
Sacred Congregation could have little weight ;
more especially as they still continued to corre
spond with the Jansenists, and to maintain their
former relations with Thomas and Louis Innes,
who held complete control over the College. It
was the firm belief of the Catholics of Paris that
the Jansenistic spirit still prevailed in the estab
lishment, as it had formerly done.
charges Referring to Thomas Innes, the nuncio goes on
against
Thomas to say that he had not only as prefect of the
and Louis
innes. College taught unsound doctrine, but had also, in
his capacity as confessor at St Barbe, induced the
students to resort to him there for all their
religious duties, in order to indoctrinate them
with Jansenistic ideas. Equally reprehensible
was the conduct of Louis Innes, through whose
means the English and Scotch residents at
St Germain-en-Laye had become infected with
the same errors. No importance, the nuncio was
assured on good authority, was to be attached
to the fact that several students of suspected
orthodoxy had been removed from the College —
LERCARIS REPORT ON JANSENISM. 207
a measure which had been devised merely to
cloak the real state of affairs ; and the same
might be said of a report which had recently
reached Kome, and which aimed at justifying
the superiors of the institution, on the ground
that they had opposed the appeal put forth by
Cardinal de Noailles. Further, there was this
to be said against them, that in order to evade
the required subscription to the Eoman formula,
they had caused a number of the students to be
ordained outside the diocese of Paris. The nuncio
refers to the difficulty he had encountered in
obtaining information on these matters, owing to
the extremely incommunicative attitude of the
authorities of the College : sufficient, however,
had been said to show what was the spirit which
animated them.
Of the condition of the Church in Scotland the Alleged
nuncio was not able to render a more favourable Jansenism
account. The seminary at Scalan, he reported, land,
was infected with Jansenism, and several of the
missionaries educated there had refused to sub
scribe the formulary. Bishop Gordon himself,
as well as his coadjutor Bishop Smith, were
not free from the reproach of having favoured
erroneous teaching, the former prelate being
charged, in particular, with having permitted the
perusal of Jansenistic books. For safety's sake,
Lercari recommended that the whole of the
missionaries should be required to sign the
208 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
formulary, no regard being paid to the objection
raised by the Scottish Jansenists, that such a
proceeding might bring the Catholics too promi
nently before the eyes of the Government.
Bishop Macdonald, the northern vicar-apostolic,
it should be added, is referred to in the report as
conspicuous for his orthodoxy and zeal for true
religion.1
Fresh brief The representations of the nuncio abundantly
cnement iustified the Holy See in taking fresh means to
XII. (1738). J
assure itself of the sentiments of the clergy of
Scotland. Clement XII. accordingly, on July
21, 1738, issued a brief in which, in precisely
the same terms as the apostolic letter dated two
years previously, he once more called on the
Scottish missionaries to subscribe the formulary
of July 8, 1733. To the list of condemned
writings, as specified in the previous document,
the Pope now caused to be added the notorious
Catechism of Charles Joachim Colbert, Bishop of
Montpellier ; and the vicars-apostolic were at the
same time directed to warn the faithful against
reading heretical or suspected books, which they
were to endeavour to suppress by every means in
their power.2
1 A translation of the nuncio's report will be found in Appendix
XVIII.
2 Bullar. Propag., torn. ii. pp. 238-243. " dementis XII. Breve
Supremum Apostolatus nostri munus, ad Episcopos Nicopolitanum et
Dianensem, Vicarios Apostolicos, necnon Episcopum Misinopoli-
tanum, Nicopolitani coadjutorem, et missionaries in regno Scotise."
STATE OF THE SCOTCH COLLEGE, PARIS. 209
Although the archives of Propaganda do not,
as far as we are aware, afford any information as
to the result of the Papal brief, still, as there is no
evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed
that the Scottish missionaries complied with the
desire of the Holy See. Serious complaints, Renewed
nevertheless, continued during the next few years against the
to reach Rome relative to the Scotch College in college
at Paris.
Paris, and also with regard to the spirit that per
vaded the Carthusian monastery in that city, the
successive priors of which, in accordance with the
will of Archbishop Beaton of Glasgow, had held
for upwards of a century the superiorship of the
College.1 The Paris Charterhouse, it was said,
while apparently reformed, had not in reality
ceased to favour the Jansenistic tenets. In a
memorial presented to the nuncio, the superiors Reply by
of the Scotch College endeavoured to refute the riors of the
aspersions cast upon them in the report of Lercari,
referring particularly to the fact that Bishop
Smith had always defended the constitution Uni-
genitus.2 It does not appear, however, that these
representations gained complete credence at the
Holy See. At a session of Propaganda held in
1762, we find mention made of a statement sub
mitted in 1737 or 1738, by a Scotch priest named
Colin Campbell, to Cardinal Riviera, and con-
1 See ante, vol. iii. p. 328. The letters referred to in the text are
contained in the Propaganda Archives, vol. ii., Scritture riferite di
Scozia. They are written by Fathers Tyrie, Campbell, and Sempill.
2 Archiv. Propag., Scrittur. riferit., vol. ii.
VOL. IV. O
210 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1700-1760.
firmed on oath, to the effect that the Bishop of
Nicopolis (Gordon) had appointed Thomas Innes as
his spiritual adviser, although well aware that he
had refused to accept the bull Unigenitus. Innes
statements had, moreover, himself declared to Campbell that
attributed .
to Thomas the bull in question was a contrivance of the
Innes.
Jesuits, that the five condemned propositions were
not to be found in Jansen's writings, and that the
Council of Trent was a mere academic assembly.
The prelate who brought forward the matter con
sidered himself justified in concluding that religious
unity had been gravely compromised by the favour
shown by Bishop Gordon to the "party of Paris"
— il partito Parigino.1 In confirmation of the
above report, we may refer to a communication
made to the Holy See by an Irish priest named
Lawson,2 who, writing to Propaganda from Paris,
expressed himself in very similar terms, and on
trustworthy authority, with regard to the Jansen-
istic spirit which prevailed in the Scotch College.
Whatever may have been the truth of these re
presentations, the Sacred Congregation does not
appear to have taken any official cognisance of
them. We learn, however, from the subsequent
history of the Church in Scotland, that the clergy
1 Archiv. Propag., Scrittur. riferit. ii., ann. 1762. "Si pu6 prestar
intera fede a quanto si contiene in detta dichiarazione, si per esser
scritta da un Sacerdote di nascita illustre e virtu singolare, si ancora
per esser stata confermata dal medesimo con giuramento."
2 Ibid., iii. "Alexander Lawson, presbyter Hiberuus et convert-
endorum catechista."
RELIGIOUS PARTIES IX SCOTLAND. 211
continued for many years to be divided into two TWO eccie-
• i f> TIT siastical
parties — the one including: those of so-called parties in
f. . . Scotland.
liberal views, who had been trained in the Col
lege at Paris, and the other embracing the stricter
Catholics, who professed to derive their principles
directly from Rome. The most prominent by far
of the alumni of the Scotch seminary at Rome
during this period was George Hay, who during
the latter half of the eighteenth century proved
himself a strong and wise ruler of the Scottish
Church, and to whose life and work we must now
proceed to turn our attention.
212
CHAPTEK IV.
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND FROM
1760 TO 1800.
DISASTROUS as were the consequences to Scottish
Catholics of the defeat of Charles Edward by
Cumberland at Culloden, and unexampled as was
the cruelty with which the victors treated the
vanquished party, this calamity was nevertheless
the indirect cause of an event which was to prove
of incalculable importance for the spread of the
Catholic faith in Scotland. This was the conver
sion of a young student of medicine at Edinburgh,
who was destined to be honoured as one of the
most zealous and learned prelates who ever ruled
the Scottish Church.
Birth and George Hay was born of Protestant parents in
education "
of George August 1729, and after a good preliminary educa
tion was entered at the University of Edinburgh,1
1 The author is mistaken in his statement that Hay was a stu
dent of Edinburgh University. He acquired his knowledge of
medicine in the Edinburgh Medical School, which was just then
rising into fame ; but he was never actually affiliated to the Uni
versity. See his life by Stothert (Gordon, Scotichronicon, vol. iv.
p. 15). — TRANSLATOR.
CONVERSION OF GEORGE HAY. 213
with a view to acquiring a knowledge of medicine.
At the time of the landing of Charles Edward on
the coast of Scotland, Hay had already made con
siderable advance in his studies ; and when, after
his victory at Prestonpans, the prince sent to
Edinburgh to procure surgical assistance for the
wounded, the young student was among those
who hurried to the battle-field, to put their pro- Hay at
r> i 11 11 • PI Preston -
iessional skill and knowledge at the service 01 the pans.
sufferers. For four months Hay followed the
prince's fortunes ; but, prostrated at length by an
illness brought on by fatigue and exposure, he was
forced to return to Edinburgh. Hardly was the
fate of Charles decided at Culloden, and the Eng
lish in possession of the capital which he had tri
umphantly entered, escorted by his faithful High
landers, but a short time before, than Hay was
arrested on a charge of taking part in the rebel
lion, and conveyed a prisoner to London. His msim-
. prison-
captivity there, however, was not a harsh one ; it
was rather a kind of honourable custody, which did
not preclude him from receiving the visits of his
friends. He chanced in this way to see a good
deal of a Catholic bookseller named Neighan,
living in Drury Lane ; and it was through this
worthy man that the gifted young student first
acquired a knowledge of Catholic doctrine. En
dowed as he was with a naturally acute and philo
sophic mind, Hay now found himself launched
upon that course of inquiry which, for the honest
214 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
seeker after truth, can have but one result. The
perusal of Gother's well-known work, " The Papist
represented and misrepresented," did much to
assist the process of his conversion ; and on De
cember 21, 1748, not long after his return to
His con- Scotland, he made his profession of the Catholic
faith at the hands of Father John Seton, of the
Society of Jesus. The young convert, who was
only in his twentieth year, at once resumed his
medical studies, and with such success that within
a year he was admitted a member of the Royal
Medical Society. An insuperable obstacle, how
ever, prevented his obtaining his diploma of doctor
of medicine ; for by the penal laws no Catholic
was eligible for such a distinction. Hay accepted
the appointment of surgeon to a foreign vessel,
and while in London, on his way abroad, formed
the acquaintance of Bishop Challoner. The illus
trious prelate and controversialist, recognising the
unusual gifts of the young physician, inspired him
with the idea of devoting himself to theological
His voca- studies. It was by this means that Hay was en-
tiontothe . '•!./•
priesthood, lightened as to his real vocation in hie, and from
this period dates the long and intimate friendship
between these two distinguished churchmen, which
was afterwards cemented by the pious agreement
between them, that whichever of the two survived
his friend should offer for his eternal repose the
holy sacrifice of the altar thrice in every week.
Hay's engagement as ship's surgeon having ter-
HAY OX THE SCOTTISH MISSION. 215
minated on the arrival of his vessel at Marseilles,
he made his way to Rome, where for nearly eight Hay at the
J J Scotch
years he pursued in the Scotch College the usual g^p.
course of philosophical and theological studies ;
with what zeal and success, was evidenced by the
learned works which he subsequently gave to the
world. On April 2, 1758, he was ordained priest
by Cardinal Spinelli,1 and quitted Rome a few
days later.2 Before entering on his new field of
labour in Scotland, the young priest bound him
self by vow never to accept any remuneration for
any use which he might henceforth find occasion
to make of his medical or surgical acquirements.
The first mission assigned to him was the exten- His first
missionary
sive district of Rathven ; 3 soon, however, he was labours.
summoned to Preshome, where one of his ancestors
had been minister two centuries before. Hay ful
filled with punctual diligence the duty incumbent
on every student of the Scotch College, of trans-
1 See Cardella, Memorie Storiche, vol. viii. p. 273. Giuseppe
Spinelli was a native of Naples. In 1725 he became nuncio at
Brussels, and in that capacity effected the removal of Van Espen
from the University of Louvain. He was raised to the cardinalate
in 1735, and was appointed prefect of Propaganda and protector of
Scotland.
2 Brady, Episcopal Succession, vol. ii. p. 461. Gordon, op. cit.,
p. 29.
3 Not Ruthven, as the author spells it. There is some confusion
also about the following statement, that Hay was bald nach Pres
home berufen. The extensive parish of St Peter's, Eathven, where
he began his missionary labours, includes the greater part of the
historic Enzie of Banff. Preshome, as the centre of this district,
was naturally the residence of the missionary, and Hay lived there,
with Bishop Grant, from the first. — TRANSLATOR.
216 CATHOLIC CHUECH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
mitting to Propaganda periodical reports as to his
missionary labours.1 The numerous letters from
him preserved in the archives of the Congregation,
written some in classical Latin, and others in ex
cellent Italian, attest the zeal of the priest, and
at a later period the learning, prudence, and piety
of the bishop. In the first letter which he ad
dressed to Cardinal Spinelli, we find him giving
touching expression to his feelings of intense
thankfulness for the light of the Catholic faith
Growing which had been bestowed on him.2 Hay's reputa-
reputation . .
of Hay. tion as a preacher was already considerable ; 3 and
such was the confidence placed in him by the two
vicars-apostolic, that he was invited to take part
in their common deliberations. Thus we find his
signature appended to a report, written in Italian,
and transmitted to Home by the bishops on
August 24, 1763 ; and it was doubtless by his
hand that the document was drawn up.4
During the first portion of Hay's missionary
career, the Lowland district continued under the
1 In Bishop Hay's time, students were bound by oath to send
these reports to Propaganda annually. The obligation was subse
quently modified into a promise to write to the Congregation quoties
opus fuerit. — TRANSLATOR.
2 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scrittur. riferit. ii., 20 Octob. 1762. The
letter is dated " all' imboccatura del fiume Spea nella Scozia."
3 "Occasionally," quaintly remarks his biographer (Stothert,
apud Gordon, op. cit., p. 56), "he resorted to the percussio furoris
and the stamping of the right foot, but neither noisily nor violently ;
and he gesticulated a good deal with his hands, in the Italian man
ner. " — TRANSLATOR.
4 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scrittur. riferit. ii., aim. 1763.
HAY CONSECRATED BISHOP, 1769. 217
administration of Bishop Alexander Smith. A
report of the year 1763, preserved among the
Acts of Propaganda, describes this prelate as
" full of zeal and the love of God " ; and his coad
jutor, James Grant, who succeeded to the vicariate
on the death of Bishop Smith in 1766, is referred
to in similar terms.1 Towards the close of 1767,
Bishop Grant, sensible of his failing powers, pro
posed to Propaganda the appointment of Hay as
his coadjutor. The request was acceded to ; and
on Trinity Sunday, 1769, he received the episcopal
consecration at Scalan. The usual certificates of Consecra-
the canonical oath and profession of faith were Bishop
Hay, 1769.
forwarded by Bishop Hay to the Sacred Congre
gation from Paris, whither he had gone on busi
ness connected with his office, on March 13,
1772.2 The new prelate fixed his residence in
Edinburgh,3 while Bishop Grant found a congenial
home for his declining years in the quiet town of
Aberdeen, where there had been a considerable
Catholic community ever since the Reformation.
1 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scrittur. riferit. ii., aim. 1763. "Mgr.
Alessandro Smith, Vescovo Misinop., il quale e uomo pieno di zelo
e di sommo amore di Dio. . . . Mgr. Giacomo Grant . . . e prelate
ugualmente pio, che dotto, pieno di zelo per la salute delle anime."
The date of Bishop Smith's death, we may note, was not 1766, as
recorded by both Gordon and Brady, but August 21, 1767. See
Stothert's Life of Bishop Hay (Gordon, op. cit., p. 57).
2 Ibid., iii., ann. 1772, 13 Martii, Parisiis Lutetiorum, " quo
propter aliqua missionum Scotise negotia perveneram."
3 He had been living there since the death of Bishop Smith
(August 1767), when he was appointed procurator of the mission.
— TRANSLATOR.
218 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
Bishop The work done by Bishop Hay for religion in
religious Scotland was undoubtedly a grand one. En-
labours. < •* °
dowed by nature with robust health and singular
strength of character, a man of prayer and of
true piety, while utterly without assumption, he
braved for more than half a century the number
less perils and fatigues which, with our present
means of communication, and the sweeping away
of the penal statutes, are now wellnigh incon
ceivable, but which then, especially in the bleak
north, were inseparably bound up with the epis
copal office. Not ]ong after his consecration, we
find the good bishop coming forward with a
Persecution memorial on behalf of the cruelly persecuted in-
of Catho- IT- n r\ i TT* 11 (*
lies in Uist. habitants of South Uist,1 where the laird 01
Boisdale, himself an apostate Catholic, had had
the hardihood to endeavour to force nearly two
hundred families to abandon the faith of their
fathers. His first move was to obtain the at
tendance of the children of Catholics at Pro
testant schools, where they received instruction
from Protestant teachers in writing and other
1 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scrittur. riferit. iii., ann. 1773. This
now rare tract was entitled " Memorial for the suffering Catholicks
in a violent Persecution for Religion, at present carried on in one
of the Western Isles of Scotland." It is subscribed " Geo. of Daulis,
Coadj. Edinburgh, 27 Nov. 1771," and concludes thus : " The above
Memorial is taken from authentic Accounts sent from Uist, and
especially from the Letters of B. Macdonald ; and as their case is
very deplorable, whilst their constancy and resolution, especially in
such poor country people, is most admirable ; and renews in these
our days the Christian heroism of the Primitive Ages."
PERSECUTION OF CATHOLICS IN TJIST. 219
elementary subjects. It was said that scurrilous
and even immoral sentences were set to the poor
children to copy; and in the Lent of 1770 at
tempts were actually made to force flesh-meat
into their mouths. The parents having, in con
sequence of these scandalous abuses, withdrawn
their children from the schools, the laird as
sembled the whole of his tenants, and ordered
them to sign a declaration renouncing their re
ligion, or to be deprived of their holdings. The
poor people, to a man, refused to comply with steadfast
ness of the
the demand, declaring their readiness rather to islanders.
beg from door to door. Disconcerted by their
firmness, the laird next offered to leave them
unmolested, provided they would consent to their
children being brought up in Protestantism ; but
he was met by the rejoinder that the souls of
their little ones were as dear to them as their
own. All efforts to pervert these faithful islanders
thus proved fruitless : in order, however, to avert
the evils that threatened them, the only available
course appeared to be emigration.1 The stirring
appeal put forth by Bishop Hay was not without
result ; from all quarters subscriptions poured in,
thus enabling him to defray the cost of transport
ing the poor emigrants to America. In a letter
addressed to Propaganda on July 10, 1772, the
1 The pastor of these poor people, an Irish Dominican named
Wynne, had some time before been forced, by the laird's threats of
personal violence, to quit the island. — TRANSLATOR.
220 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
three bishops express their hope that this enforced
exodus of Scottish Catholics may have at least
one good result — the spread of the true faith in
distant lands.1
Bishop The visit of Bishop Hay to Paris in 1772, which
Hay and > J
the Douai has already been mentioned, was in connection
College. 0 •>
with the endeavour he was making to reclaim the
property and funds of the Scotch College at
Douai, which had been confiscated by the French
Government ten years before, as belonging to the
Jesuits. The direction of the establishment had
been, in fact, since its foundation, in the hands
of the Society. One of the first rectors was
Father Bonfrere, the well-known commentator
on Holy Scripture ; 2 and we find the same
office held successively by Father Kobe (who
died in 1633) and Father Curie, to whose gen
erosity, as we have already seen, the institution
was so greatly indebted.3 Frequent complaints
were made from Scotland about this time, to the
effect that efforts were being made to convert the
College into an exclusively Jesuit seminary. The
question between the vicars -apostolic and the
1 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scritt. riferit. iii. " Quse quidem
emigratio . . . uti in Domino speramus, religioni et fidelibus
ubique profutura est."
2 Dancoisne, Etablissements religieux Britanniques d Douai, p. 85.
3 His memory was preserved by the following inscription in the
refectory of the College : " E. P. Hippolytus Curie, presbyter
Societatis Jesu, ex patre Scoto Regime Marise Stuartse a secretis,
alterque ab ea Collegii Scotorum parens, obiit 21 Octobr. ami. 1638
setatis sate 40, relig. 20."
SCOTCH CHURCH PROPERTY IN FRANCE. 221
Society was submitted to the Holy See for de
cision ; but no final settlement appears to have
been arrived at.1 The Government of Louis XV., Scotch
i . . church
however, recognised the justice of the claim ad- property
in France.
vanced by Bishop Hay, and directed the restora
tion to the Scotch bishops of the property in
question ; 2 while royal letters-patent, dated Feb
ruary 1780, confirmed the College in possession
of the property acquired previous to 1749.3 After
the departure of the Jesuit fathers, the rectorship
was held by members of the secular clergy down
to the epoch of the French Revolution, which
proved fatal to the Scotch College, as to so many
similar institutions. On June 5, 1790, Lord
Robert Fitzgerald, the British Charge d' Affaires,
addressed a note to the French Government de
manding protection for the Irish and Scotch
Colleges in Paris. From a report issued a few
months later, we learn that the British religious
establishments in France numbered twenty-eight,
with an estimated revenue of 329,000 livres. The
National Assembly in the course of the same year
Douai
(1790) confirmed to the College at Douai the under the
grant of two thousand francs which had been tion.
1 See Tierney, Dodd's Church Hist, of EngL, vol. iv. pp. 122-128,
notes.
2 This is hardly correct. The Scotch property was intrusted to
a French civil bureau, which defrayed out of it the education of a
certain number of Scotch students at the College. See Gordon,
Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 94. — TRANSLATOR.
3 Dancoisne, op. tit., p. 87.
222 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
bestowed on it by the king. Three years later,
however, its doors were closed, and it was trans
formed into a prison, where were confined a large
number of priests and nobles obnoxious to the
Government. Meanwhile the professors and
students of the College were imprisoned at
Izellez-Equerchin, and were subsequently com
pelled to quit France. The rector, Abbe Far-
quharson, a man of superior abilities and wide
reputation,1 alone remained at his post, and was
for some time confined, together with the students
of the English College, in the fortress of Doul-
lens.2 After the peace of 1815, Farquharson sent
in a claim for indemnity from the French Govern
ment, amounting to nearly a million and a half of
francs. Payment, however, was refused, on the
ground that the British Colleges in France had
o o
held their property not as English, Irish, or Scot
tish subjects, but by virtue of letters-patent of
the King of France.3
By means of repeated and earnest appeals to
the generosity of English Catholics, Bishop Hay
1 Forbes (Edinburgh Review, 1864, p. 201) describes him as " a
man of elegant manners, and much respected by every one. . . .
An accomplished scholar."
2 Dancoisne, op. cit., p. 88.
3 Forbes, loc. cit. It was widely believed at the time, but on no
good authority, that the compensation -money had been actually
paid to the British Government, who, in their wholesome dread of
encouraging Popery, expended the whole sum in building the
Brighton Pavilion for the Regent, afterwards George IV. —
TRANSLATOR.
FOUNDATION OF AQUHOBTIES SEMINARY. 223
succeeded in obtaining a considerable sum towards
the relief of his impoverished mission ; and in the
last year of the eighteenth century he transferred
the seminary from Scalan, where it had existed
for more than three-quarters of a century, to a Opening of
more commodious and convenient site at Aquhor- seminary
A i i i • -XT • in ^cot"
ties, in Aberdeenshire. JNor was the bishop un- land.
known in the field of literary labour. It was long
his wish to provide for the increasing demand for
an improved Catholic translation of the Bible ;
and in 1790 he took steps, in concert with Bishop
Geddes, for the undertaking of this important
work, which was to be based on a careful study of
the Greek and Vulgate versions, the existing
English translations, and the authorised Italian
version of Martini. Father Robertson, a Bene
dictine from Ratisbon, was to act as editor. The
first publication of the new edition took place in New edi-
1796.1 More than twenty years before, Bishop Bible.
Hay had printed a series of letters, entitled
' Usury and Interest," in rejoinder to an Irish Bishop
Dominican named Hope, who, in some essays con- author. '
Letters on
tributed to the Edinburgh Weekly Magazine, Usury-
had maintained, under the pseudonym of John
Simple, the absolute unlawfulness of receiving
1 It was not, however, a new translation, as was originally in
tended, and as appears to be implied in the text. Bishop Hay
showed himself so averse to any alteration in the received English
version, that it was finally resolved, with the co-operation of the
English vicars-apostolic, to issue merely a reprint of Challoner's
Bible. See Gordon, op. cit., vol. iv. pp. 388, 389. — TRANSLATOR.
224 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
interest on loans. The bishop opposed the views
put forward by Father Hope, clearly proving the
equity of demanding a moderate recompense for
money lent, more especially in consideration of
the changes which had in course of time taken
O
place in the economic life of nations. The fact, as
he argued, of all commercial transactions being
carried on by means of money, and not, as for
merly, in kind, as well as the cessation of gain, the
supervening loss, or the risk incurred by the loan
of money, amply warranted the lender in exacting
interest from the borrower. The bishop's letters
appeared in a collected form in London in 1774,
dedicated to the Duke of Buccleuch.1
The name of Bishop Hay as an author, how
ever, was best known through his work, in two
The volumes, on the ' Scripture Doctrine of Miracles,'
which was published in 1776, and aroused con
siderable attention in England, as well as in
Scotland. The occasion of this publication was
a controversy which had arisen in 1770 between
the Jesuit Father Duguid and an Episcopalian
minister named Abernethy, on the subject of
miracles. Bishop Hay at once conceived the idea
of contributing; to the discussion, but it was not
o
until nearly six years later that his work made its
appearance. In sixteen chapters, the Catholic
1 " Letters on Usury and Interest ; showing the advantage of
Loans for the support of Trade and Commerce." London, printed
by J. P. Coghlan, 1774.
WRITINGS OF BISHOP HAY. 225
teaching as to miracles is treated dogmatically
and apologetically, and proof is brought that
God's hand is not shortened since the days of the
Apostles, and that it is consequently impossible,
without manifest inconsistency, to reject what are
known as ecclesiastical miracles. Against Hume,
the leading representative of the Anglo-Scottish
school of sceptics, and opponent of the principle of
causality, who had made the doctrine of miracles
the chief object of his attacks, Hay brought to
bear the teaching of St Thomas in proof of the
possibility and actuality of the miraculous. His
arguments were, moreover, reinforced by his own
exceptional knowledge of natural science, of which
he makes skilful use throughout the work. The
second volume closes with an appendix, containing
a dialogue between Orthodoxus and Philaretes on
the doctrine of transubstantiation.1 Mr Aber-
nethy published a reply to the bishop, who in
turn rejoined by printing, early in 1777, some
;f Explanatory Remarks " on the same subject.
The ' Scripture Doctrine of Miracles ' was very
favourably received in England, Rome, and Spain,
and the sale of the work proved successful. Its
1 The dialogue was not altogether an imaginary one. The
original disputants were a master-baker and a master-shoemaker,
both members of Mr Abernethy's congregation, who were induced
to inquire into the doctrines of the Catholic religion, and whom
Bishop Hay's masterly exposition of those doctrines finally decided
to submit to the Catholic Church. — TRANSLATOR.
VOL. IV.
226 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
merits were freely recognised even by the Prot
estant critics of the day.1
The « sin- More, perhaps, than in any of his other writ-
tian/ &c. ings, Bishop Hay showed himself as a theologian at
once popular and learned, in the exposition which
he published of the complete cycle of Christian
doctrine, and of which we may instance the sec
tions treating of the Church as especially luminous
and profound.2 As was to be expected from a
writer so clear-sighted and so pious, he lays down
unhesitatingly the traditional teaching of theo
logians as to the official infallibility of the Roman
Pontiff, assigning to that doctrine, if not the full
weight of dogmatic authority, yet all the force due
to what he rightly declares to be the sententia
corn/munis of the faithful. Many thousand copies
were printed of this admirable work, and it has
continued, down to our own day, to enjoy the
reputation which it deserves.
suppres- The earlier years of Bishop Hay's vicariate were
Society of signalised by the suppression of the Society of
1773!' Jesus by Clement XIV., in consequence of which
1 " Our Church is here boldly challenged to the field by no
contemptible adversary. With respect to the general execution
of this Work, it must be allowed that the plan is happily con
ducted, the topics judiciously and artfully disposed, and the Reason
ing, though not invincible, specious and dangerous. . . . The style
is expressive and clear." — Scots Magazine, vol. xxxviii. (1776) p. 43.
A reprint of the work, edited by the late Archbishop Strain, was
published in Edinbui'gh in 1872.
2 Hay, The Sincere Christian : The Devout Christian : The Pious
Christian. 5 vols.
THE SCOTCH BISHOPS AND THE JESUITS. 227
event the Jesuit Fathers ceased to direct the
Scotch College in Rome, which was placed under
a commission of five cardinals. A notification of
the change was made to Bishop Grant by Cardinal
Castelli on August 25, 1773, with the promise
that he should shortly receive from the nuncio at
Brussels a copy of the brief of suppression. To
gether with the brief, instructions were trans
mitted to the vicars - apostolic respecting the
future employment of members of the Society.
The bishops were permitted by Propaganda to The scotch
. J bishops
let them continue to serve on the mission, on and the
. . Jesuits.
their giving an undertaking to submit entirely
to the episcopal authority ; and each of the
Fathers was as soon as possible to be notified ac
cordingly. All the Jesuits at this time stationed
in Scotland, twelve in number, at once expressed
their readiness to comply with the orders of the
Holy See.1 Shortly afterwards, however, some
temporary misunderstanding appears to have
arisen between the vicars - apostolic and the
Scotch ex-Jesuits, with regard to the adminis
tration of the property formerly belonging to the
Society. In a letter to Cardinal Castelli, dated
June 15, 1774, Bishop Hay, in concert with his
colleagues, went fully into the matter, petitioning
that the whole of the property heretofore admin-
1 Gordon (Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 119) prints the formula of
submission, by their subscription to which the ex-Jesuits incor
porated themselves with the secular missionary clergy.
228 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
istered by the Scotch Jesuits might now be placed
under the bishops, on the ground that it had
originally been bestowed in the first place for
the promotion of the faith in Scotland, and
secondly, for the support of the Jesuit mission
aries ; and that the second of these two objects
was now no longer capable of attainment.1
The act of Pope Clement, however important
its results to the Church at large, brought but
little change to the Catholics of Scotland, where
Number of the number of the faithful had greatly diminished
in Scot- since the rising; of Charles Edward ; and the
laud, 1779. ™ . ,
priests in the country were probably sumcientiy
numerous for all the pastoral duties required of
them. At the General Assembly of 1779, the
total number of Catholics was estimated by Dr
Eobertson at less than 20,000, of whom, accord-
, ing to the same authority, not more than twenty
possessed land worth a hundred a-year, while in
the commercial world there was not one of any
eminence.2 The statistics, however, forwarded
to Rome by Bishop Hay and his colleagues place
the number of communicants in the Scottish
1 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scritture riferit. iii. " Bona omnia supra-
dicta a benefactoribus duplici fine donari manifestum est, primario
quidem ad promovendam fidem in patria nostra, secundario autem,
ut missionarii Scoti Societatis Jesu inde alerentur. Cum igitur
hsec secundaria intentio amplius impleri uequeat, consequens est,
ut illi qui ad primariam donatorum intentionem exequendam
laborant, plenum jus atque titulum, ut iisdem bonis alantur,
acquirant."
2 Scots Magazine, vol. xli. (1779) pp. 413, 414.
SUMMARY OF THE PEXAL LAWS. 229
Mission at about 17,000, which would raise the
total number of Catholics to some 30,000 souls.
The best idea, perhaps, of the social and polit- Legal
. . ... status of
ical status of this comparatively insignificant Scottish
J Catholics.
body, at the period of which we are now treat
ing, is afforded by a glance at the various legal
enactments affecting them, as summarised in the
Statute Laiv abridged of Lord Kames. The fol
lowing is a complete abstract of the statutes in
question.
All professors of the Catholic religion were Summary
obliged to quit the country, unless they would penal
1 . * . J J statutes.
subscribe the Confession of Faith. The purchase
or dissemination of Catholic books was punish
able with banishment and confiscation of personal
property. Jesuits and seminary priests were to
be pursued, apprehended, and punished with
death and confiscation. The harbouring or en
tertainment of them was likewise punishable with
confiscation. Those guilty of hearing mass, of
refusing to attend the Protestant service, or of
endeavouring to pervert any of his Majesty's
subjects, either by reasoning or by books, were
liable to the same penalty. Catholic books were
to be searched out and destroyed by the magis
trates, and importers of such books to be com
mitted to prison during the king's pleasure.
The presbyteries were authorised to summon
before them " all Papists, and those suspected
of Papistry," and to require them to make satis-
230 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
Summary faction to the Kirk : failing which they were to
of the £ J
penal be denounced to the Privy Council, and their
statutes.
property escheated to the Crown ; and all persons
harbouring them were likewise liable to confisca
tion. Any one suspected of being a Jesuit, priest,
or " trafficking Papist," and convicted of changing
his name or surname, incurred sentence of per
petual banishment, under pain of death if he
returned to Scotland ; and a similar penalty was
incurred by mere presence at any meeting " where
there is altar, mass-book, vestments, Popish images,
or other Popish trinkets." Heavy fines were im
posed on noblemen or others sending their sons
to be educated in foreign seminaries ; and parents
whose children became Catholics abroad had to
find caution that they would send them no pecu
niary assistance, except for the purpose of bring
ing them back to Scotland. Children under the
care of Catholic parents or guardians were to be
taken from them, and intrusted to some " well-
affected and religious friend," the means for their
support and education being provided out of the
property of their parents. Severe penalties were
incurred for the crime of converting to the Catho
lic faith any of his Majesty's Protestant subjects ;
and a Protestant servant becoming a Catholic
was punished as an apostate, and was forbidden
to take a situation in any Catholic family. Catho
lics were incapable of acquiring real property,
either by purchase or by deed of gift made in
SUMMARY OF THE PENAL LAWS. 231
their favour, or in trust on their behalf, such Summary
of the
deeds being by law absolutely null and void, g
They were also incapable, after the age of fifteen,
of inheriting estates : if the heir, on attaining
that age, refused to renounce his faith, his right
of succession lapsed, passing to the nearest Prot
estant heir. If the latter declined to avail him
self of it, it passed to the next Protestant after
him, and so on until, as worded in the statute,
the right was " effectually established " in the
Protestant line. All dispositions, donations, and
legacies in favour of " cloisters, or other Popish
societies," were ipso facto null and void ; nor
were Catholics permitted to make any disposition
of their property in prejudice of their heirs-ap
parent. A Protestant turning Catholic forfeited
his whole heritable estate to his nearest Prot
estant heir. No Catholic could be king or
queen of the realm, " or bear any office whatever
therein"; and not only Catholics, but persons
marrying Catholics, were incapable of ever suc
ceeding to the crown. Thy could be neither
governors, schoolmasters, guardians, nor factors,
a fine of a thousand merks being imposed on
those who employed them in such capacities.
They were forbidden to teach " any art, science,
or exercise of any sort," under a penalty of five
hundred merks. Protestants were prohibited
from employing Catholic servants, under the
same penalty ; and the informer in such cases
232 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
summary was entitled to the amount of the fine as his
of the
Stes. rewarcl.1 Such was the Draconian code of laws,
of which one of the principal objects was, as has
been truly remarked, to reduce the Catholic por
tion of the community to a condition of brutal
ignorance ; 2 or, in the words of Burke, " to render
men patient under such a deprivation of all the
rights of human nature, everything which would
give them a knowledge or feeling of those rights
was forbidden." 3
Efforts of By the operation of these iniquitous statutes,
Hay for the adherents of the ancient faith in Scotland had
Catholic
relief. been gradually reduced to a condition little better
than that of slaves and outlaws. The amelioration
of this state of affairs was an object well fitted to
enlist the mental vigour and wide sympathies of
Bishop Hay ; and the fact that a relief bill in
favour of the English Catholics was at this time
passing through Parliament, served to encourage
him in his efforts. The general tone of public
opinion on the question, as reported by the bishops
to Propaganda in August 1777,4 also seemed to
1 The substance of the above abstract is cited from Lord Kames's
Statute Law abridged by a writer in the Scots Magazine, vol. xl.
(1778) pp. 513-517.
2 Lecky, England in the Eighteenth Century, vol. i. p. 285.
3 Burke, Letter to a Peer of Ireland on the Penal Laws, apud
Lecky, loc. cit.
* Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scritture riferit. iii. " Summa cum
voluptate Eminentise Vestrse et S. Congregationi notum facimus,
omnia ab aliquot annis hie pacatiora esse, et nos insolita quadam
libertate in hoc regno frui incipere. Cujus duo haud exigui ponderis
ANTI-CATHOLIC OUTBREAK IN SCOTLAND. 233
warrant them in entertaining brighter hopes for
the future. At this juncture occurred events
which, while apparently calculated to throw back
the prospects of Catholic emancipation, in reality
prepared the way for its concession. An agitation Outbreak
suddenly sprang up in Scotland, with reference to catholic
feeling in
the proposed measures of Catholic relief, which Scotland.
led to the wildest outbursts of popular fanaticism,
and afterwards spread into England through the
baneful instrumentality of Lord George Gordon.
Pamphlets of the most outrageous character, re
calling the fiercest period of the sixteenth century,
were scattered broadcast through the country.
Pictorial representations of the Man of Sin, the
Beast of the Apocalypse, the Scarlet Woman of
Babylon, and the Lord Advocate holding in his
hand the obnoxious bill, were circulated by thou
sands, in order to inflame the passions of the
populace. The mere rumour that it was in con
templation to petition the Government for some
relaxation in the unjust and oppressive penal laws
against Catholics, proved sufficient to rouse a
argumenta hsec sunt : nempe quod ab ipso publico regimine facultas
qusedam concessa est, extruendi sacellum in provincia Perthensi
unum, in civitate Edinburgensi alterum. In civitate Ediuburgensi
ab annis Catholicorum numerus ita auctus fuerat, turn per converses
ad fidem, turn per confluentes illuc ex variis regni partibus fidelea,
nt locus cultui divino destinatus illos capere non posset." The
Bishop and cathedral chapter of Katisbon, as well as the Scotch
Benedictine Abbey there, had contributed towards the erection of
the new chapel in Edinburgh, and had received letters of thanks
from Propaganda for their generosity.
234 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
storm of Puritan opposition. The General As
sembly of 1778 had already protested in advance
against the disastrous consequences certain, in
their opinion, to result from any measure of
Catholic relief. A violent diatribe on the sub
ject was delivered by Dr Gillies, a Glasgow
minister, who concluded his harangue by pro
posing a special committee to watch over Prot
estant interests, and give due warning of the
obnoxious bill being brought before Parliament.1
In October 1778, a few months after the meeting
of the Assembly, the Synod of Glasgow and Ayr
appointed a general fast-day within their bounds,
in view of the " awful signs of divine displeasure
which are visibly displayed at this time, particu
larly the encouragement given to and the growth
of Popery." " The astonishing progress," it was
further declared, " of this detestable, cruel, and
unjust superstition, is so much the more alarming,
as it appears not only in remote and uncultivated
corners, but in the most populous and improved
parts of the land." 2
Riots in The spark thus let fall was not long, as might
have been foreseen, in bursting into flame. On
the Sunday following the meeting of the Synod
1 It should be added for the credit of the good sense of the
Assembly, that Dr Gillies's motion, "after a debate of several
hours," was rejected by a majority of 96 votes, only 24 members
supporting it. See Scots Magazine, vol. xl. (1778) p. 270. —
TRANSLATOR.
2 Scots Magazine, vol. xl. (1778) pp. 565, 566.
RIOTS IN GLASGOW AND EDINBURGH. 235
to which we have just referred, an excited mob
gathered round a private house in Glasgow, where
it was understood that the Catholic service was
being celebrated. The poor people, as they
emerged from their humble place of worship,
were hooted and pelted with stones and dirt :
the rabble broke all the windows, took the doors
off their hinges, and rifled the house of its con
tents, " breathing blood and slaughter," as an
eyewitness narrates, " to all Papists, and in every
respect profaning the Lord's Day in a grosser
manner than I ever knew done in Britain." l The
Glasgow Catholics were thus deprived of their
only chapel ; but by the kindness of Mr Bagnall,
an English resident in the town,2 they were per
mitted to assemble for divine service in his house.
But the anti-Popish zeal of the populace was not
yet satisfied. On February 9, 1779, a fresh
attack on the Catholics of Glasgow was organised
by the association known as " Friends to Prot
estantism," and Mr Bagnall's residence and ad
jacent warehouses were deliberately set on fire,
and burned to the ground.3 Edinburgh had been and in
, , - . -i f ^ u f Edillburgh-
the scene ot similar outrages a iew days beiore.
1 Scots Magazine, vol. xl. (1778) p. 685.
2 Mr Bagnall had introduced the manufacture of Staffordshire
pottery into Glasgow, and he and a French gentleman who had
resided for some time in the town as a thread-maker were specially
obnoxious to the fanatical party. See Stothert's Life of Bishop Hay
(Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 154). — TRANSLATOR.
3 Scots Magazine, vol. xli. (1779) p. 108.
236 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
" Men and brethren," thus ran a circular, signed
" A Protestant," and industriously circulated
throughout the city during the previous week —
" Whoever shall find this letter, will take as a
warning to meet at Leith Wynd, on Wednesday
next in the evening, to pull down that pillar of
Popery lately erected there."1 "We had re
ceived," wrote Bishop Hay to Propaganda on
February 12, " the promise of the ministry and
of other influential persons, that the same in
dulgence [i.e., a relief bill] should be extended to
Scotland in the first session of Parliament. No
sooner did this become publicly known than the
fanatic party among the preachers commenced to
excite the alarm of the people. . . . No Catholic
could appear abroad without being pointed at,
and saluted with these or similar cries : ' See the
Papist, the black Papist ! shoot him, kill him ! ' '
^n ^e appointed day, Wednesday, February 2,
Bishop the storm burst, and an organised attack was
directed against the recently erected chapel-house
in Chalmers' Close. " So thickly rained the
stones from all quarters," writes Bishop Hay,
" that they [Fathers Cameron and Mathison]
could make no resistance, and only escaped
with the greatest difficulty." By five o'clock
the mob had forced their way, by dint of
blows with stones and hammers, into the house,
which was instantly wrecked and then set on
1 Scots Magazine, vol. xli. (1779) p. 107.
RIOTS IN EDINBURGH, 1779. 237
fire.1 It was completely destroyed, and a number
of other houses belonging to Catholics were at the
same time attacked and plundered. During the
whole of these proceedings the city authorities
behaved with disgraceful supineness. They had
neglected to take the least precautionary measures
against the expected riot, and on its breaking out
they lacked either the courage or the will to sup
press it. "I have addressed to the court," con
cludes Hay, " an exact report of the whole affair,
with a demand for redress and protection." 2 The
congregation of Propaganda granted to the bishop
1 Bishop Hay, says his biographer (Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 160),
arrived in Edinburgh at the very time when the flames had reached
their height, and observing the unusual crowd, asked an old woman
what it meant. " O sir," was the reply, " we are burning the Pop
ish chapel, and we only wish we had the bishop to throw into the
fire." — TRANSLATOR.
2 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scrittur. riferit. iii. Relazione di una
persecuzione, che al presente si eseguisce in Scozia contro i Cattolici
Romani, mandata da Mgr. Giorgio Hay, Vescovo Daulen., Vic.
Aplico. in detto Regno. Edinborgo, 12 Feb. 1779. "Noi avevamo
la promessa dal ministero e da altre persone potenti, che la medesima
indulgenza si sarebbe stesa alia Scozia nella prima sessione del
Parlamento. Sapendosi ci6 pubblicamente, il partito dei Fanatici
tra i ministri ecclesiastic! immediatamente cominci6 ad allarmare il
popolo. . . . Nessun cattolico Romano poteva comparire senza
esser segnato a dito, e senza esser ricevuto con questi o simili ter
mini : Ecco un Papista, un nero Papista ! tiragli, amazzalo ! . . .
I sassi piovevano dentro cosl spesse da tutte le parti, che non potet-
tero piu resistere, e con moltissime difficolta ne uscirono. . . .
Verso le cinque la canaglia comincio ad assalire la posta esteriore
con sassi e martelli con tale violenza, che tutti coloro che erano
dentro furono contenti di sacrificare la loro roba. ... I magistrati
si portarono in una maniera assai vergognosa in un' affare di tanta
importanza ; non presero precauzione veruna per prevenire il
tumulto, e manc6 loro il coraggio o la volonta per sedarlo."
238 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
the sum of a hundred scudi, in consideration of
the loss which he had sustained.1
Principal While the wave of popular excitement ran thus
Robertson
an.i the higli m bcotlaiid, men were still to be lound who,
"No Pop- &.
ery" cry. amid the unmeasured invectives and attacks which
assailed the Catholics on every side, preserved
unimpaired their sense of right and of justice.
Among those who, by the support they gave to
the proposed repeal of the penal statutes, drew
down upon themselves the wrath of the ultra-
Protestants, was Principal Robertson, whose
speech at the General Assembly of 1779 has al
ready been referred to. " My character as a man,
as a citizen, and as a minister of the Gospel,"
he exclaimed on the same occasion, " has been
delineated in the most odious colours : I have
been represented as a pensioner of the Pope, as
an agent for Rome, as a seducer of my brethren
to Popery, as the tool of a king and ministry
bent on overturning the Protestant religion. In
pamphlets, in newspapers, and hand-bills, I have
been held out to an enraged mob, as the victim
who deserved to be next sacrificed, after they had
satiated their vengeance on a Popish bishop. . . .
For several weeks hardly a day passed on which
I did not receive incendiary letters, several of
them signed by Lovers of truth, and Friends to
the Protestant Religion. It was in the name of
Jesus I was warned that my death was resolved,
1 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Acta, ann. 1779.
PASTORAL LETTER OF BISHOP HAY. 239
and the instruments prepared for cutting short
my days. May God forgive the men who have
disseminated such principles." 1
Meanwhile, on the Catholic side, Bishop Hay Bishop
continued to support with unfailing courage vice to' the
. v • • Catholics.
the cause of his persecuted co-religiomsts. In
February 1779 he addressed to his flock a
touching pastoral letter, whose terms testify at
once to his personal piety and absence of all
resentment towards his antagonists, and to the
firm confidence in God and unshaken sense of
right which ever distinguished him. " We think
it our duty," he wrote, " to administer to you
both advice and consolation, as the circumstances
permit and the occasion seems to require. . . .
Though we cannot help being deeply afflicted
for the sufferings of our dear people and for
the interruption of the exercises of our holy
religion, yet, confiding in the arm of the Most
High, we hope for a speedy relief from His
infinite goodness. We therefore earnestly be
seech you all, not to be discouraged under the
afflicting hand of God, but to put your trust
in His all-powerful goodness, who when He is
angry remembers mercy, and when He chastises
us as children for our sins, intends at the same
time our greater advancement in virtue ; let us
not fail to co-operate with His fatherly views,
but remember that the time of suffering is the
1 Scots Magazine, vol. xli. (1779) pp. 412, 413.
240 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
time of trial — the showing our fidelity to God
and our sincerity in His service. . . . Above all
things, we enjoin you not to allow the smallest
resentment to enter your hearts against those
who injure us : remember they are only the
instruments in the hands of God, who, like a
tender father, chastises us His children by their
means, but who could not touch a hair of our
heads except in as far as they are permitted by
Him. In this view, let us have all compassion
towards them, and pity their mistaken zeal,
which makes them think that by persecuting
us they do God a service. Let us imitate the
example which our Lord gives us on the cross,
and pray for them in His words, ' Father,
forgive them ; for they know not what they
do."
Negotia- The publication of Bishop Hay's pastoral, which
tious for .
catholic appeared in the kcots Magazine for February
1779, and was also printed in London, created
a very good impression in all quarters. Desiring
to take advantage of this favourable sentiment,
the bishop visited London, and laid before King
George III. a loyal address from the Scottish
Catholics, which was graciously received. At
the same time he entered into negotiations with
some of the principal Ministers, in reference to
the Catholic relief bill which it was hoped
shortly to submit to Parliament. Lords George
Germain and Weymouth were among those who
BISHOP HAYS MEMORIAL. 241
espoused the cause, and pledged themselves to
do their best to ensure its success ; while Lord
Linton, a nobleman of much influence, interested
himself warmly in a plan which was at that
time entertained by many Scottish Catholics —
namely, a scheme of emigration on a large scale.
The Spanish ambassador, among others, promised
the co-operation of his Government; but the
project, which would have done incalculable
injury to the cause of Catholicism in Scotland,
was soon afterwards abandoned.
An additional motive was thus supplied to Bishop
Bishop Hay to continue his unremitting efforts So£d.Me
to secure the success of the plan which alone
could restore the Scottish Catholics to their
natural rights. A " Memorial in behalf of the
Eoman Catholics of Edinburgh and Glasgow,
containing a full account of their sufferings,
and of the means taken to excite the mob
against them," was drawn up by the bishop,
and circulated among the members of the
legislature ; and a petition, based on the facts Petition to
set forth in the Memorial, and signed by Hay
and Lord Linton, was presented by the latter
to the king, who referred it to the consideration
of Parliament.1 The Catholics of Scotland com
plained in the petition of the treatment they
had recently received, and asked from Parliament
compensation for their losses, and the enactment
1 Scots Magazine, vol. xli. (1779) p. 131.
VOL. IV. Q
242 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
of such measures as would prevent similar excesses
for the future. They gave emphatic expression
to their sentiments of loyalty and devotion to
wards their country, for which they were ready,
in case of need, to sacrifice their lives and for
tunes ; and they ventured to expect in return the
protection of the state in the exercise of their reli
gion. The great and serious injury done to them
in the late pbpular risings demanded due compen
sation, which they earnestly prayed the Govern
ment to grant them. Three days before this
petition was submitted to Parliament, Mr Wilkes,
Scottish the member for Middlesex, had called the atten-
C'atliolics. .
tion of the House of Commons to the proposed
relief bill for Scotland, and had asked on what
ground the concessions which had been granted
to the English Catholics were still refused to their
Scottish co-religionists. The Lord Advocate en
deavoured to excuse the delay which had taken
place, on the ground of the inflamed state of pub
lic opinion in Scotland on the question, and the
fear of further tumults if the bill were persevered
with ; to which Wilkes replied in terms of crush
ing sarcasm, declaring that the action of the
Government had practically subjected the proceed
ings of the British Parliament to the control of an
Edinburgh mob. On March 18, 1779, the peti
tion of the Scottish Catholics was brought before
Parliament by the great orator in whom the
wronged and oppressed ever found their warmest
COMPENSATION TO THE CATHOLICS. 243
champion. In glowing and eloquent terms, Ed- Speech of
i T» i 11- i • r*t Edmund
muncl Burke asserted the lust claim of the peti- Burke in
r theCom-
tioners to the same advantages which had been nions-
bestowed on the Catholics of England, and de
picted in the most vivid colours the brutal bigotry
of the party of fanatics, who had incited the mob
against peaceful and law-abiding subjects. He
concluded by reading from a small pamphlet an
abstract of the various penal laws relating to
Scotland, and challenging any member of the
House to rise and advocate their enforcement.
Notwithstanding the eloquent appeal of Mr
Burke, the motion to consider the petition in a
committee of the whole House was not supported
by the Government, owing to the strong opposi
tion of Lord George Gordon and other fanatical
Protestants ; and the matter was consequently
allowed to drop.1 The Edinburgh Catholics, how- compensa-
i , «ip i • tion to the
ever, subsequently received trom the magistrates Catholics.
the sum of sixteen hundred pounds in compensa
tion for the losses they had sustained ; 2 and a
payment was made to Mr Bagnall, on the same
account, by the municipal authorities of Glasgow.
In the following year, the general feeling which
prevailed against any measure of relief in favour
of the Scottish Catholics, was still further accen
tuated by the riotous excesses associated with the Riots, 1790.
1 Scots Magazine, vol. xli. (1779) pp. 131-135.
2 The amount was confessedly inadequate to repair the damage
done in the riots. Bishop Hay estimated his personal loss at up
wards of ,£2500. — TRANSLATOR.
244 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
name of Lord George Gordon, whose character
has been summed up by an able writer as a com
pound of fanaticism, vanity, and ambition.1 On
May 29, 1780, the Protestant Association assem
bled in the Coachmakers' Hall in London, under
the presidency of Lord George, who read to the
meeting a brief addressed by the Pope to the Eng
lish Catholics, argued therefrom the alarming pro
gress of Popery in the country, and called on the
members to unite in a monster petition to Parlia
ment on the subject. Four days later some 20,000
men marched in procession to Westminster, and
surrounded the Houses of Parliament, carrying
Monster with them a petition said to have been signed by
petition to ... - , ,, , , TT
Pariia- 120,000 persons. Many members ol both Houses
were seized and roughly handled. The Archbishop
insults to of York was grossly insulted ; the President of the
Council was pulled from his coach and his wig torn
off; Lord Mansfield, whose unbending rectitude had
exposed him to the stigma of being a friend of the
Catholics, escaped with difficulty serious injury;
the Duke of Northumberland was robbed of his
watch ; the clothes of the Bishop of Lichfield were
torn to ribbons ; while his brother of Lincoln had
a wheel of his carriage wrenched off by the mob.
The chapels of the Sardinian and Bavarian em-
1 Lecky, History of England in the Eighteenth Century, vol. iii.
]). 510. " He was a Scotchman, and appears to have been honestly
fanatical, but his fanaticism was mixed with something of the vanity
and ambition of a demagogue, and with a vein of recklessness and
eccentricity closely akin to insanity."
SCOTCH RELIEF BILL, 1793. 245
bassies were pillaged and burnt, a reward of five Riiage of
the em-
hundred pounds being afterwards offered by Gov-
ernment for the discovery of the perpetrator of
the outrage. For several days London was at the
mercy of the mob, and the riots were only sup
pressed after the sacrifice of many lives and an
enormous loss of property of every kind. With
the restoration of order appeared a royal procla- Royal pro-
* * . clamation.
mation denouncing in particular the destruction
of the embassy chapels as a violation of interna
tional right, and holding out a prospect of severe
measures for the repression of similar outrages in
the future. "The month of June 1780," wrote
Gibbon, himself an eyewitness of these scenes,
" will ever be marked by a dark and diabolical
fanaticism which I supposed to be extinct, but
which actually subsists in Great Britain perhaps
beyond any other country in Europe."
The result of these events was that the hands introduc
tion of the
of Parliament were for the present tied; and reiiefinii
-1- tor bcot-
twelve years were allowed to elapse before the land, 1793.
Catholics of Scotland found themselves released
from the most oppressive of the penal laws. On
April 22, 1793, the Lord Advocate obtained per
mission to introduce the long-delayed measure of
relief. In his speech on the occasion he declared
the grounds on which the penal statutes had been
based to be no longer in existence, and gave
instances of the extreme hardships which must
1 Miscellaneous Works, vol. ii. p. 241.
246 CATHOLIC CHUECH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
be the result of putting them into force.1 The
itsprovi- effect of the bill was to secure to Catholics, on.
condition of their subscribing- to the revised form
o
of abjuration, the same freedom from all the pains
and penalties imposed by former Acts (especially
those passed in the first Parliament of William
III.) as if they had actually made the " renuncia
tion of Popery " therein required.2 It secured to
them also the peaceful possession and free dis
position of their property ; but they continued,
as before, to be excluded from almost every
public office, including that of teacher or professor
of any subject whatsoever. Moreover, as appeared
from the answer given by the Crown lawyers to
certain queries put by the Scottish Catholics in
the following year, they were still compelled to
have their banns published in the parish church,
to be married by the parish minister, to pay dues
for baptism to the parish officials ; and a Prot
estant consenting to be married by a priest was
liable to fine and church censures. Notwith
standing these drawbacks, the bill, which passed
the Upper House on May 24, 1793, and obtained
the royal assent a few days later, was received by
its recep- the Catholics of Scotland with sincere gratitude,
tion by the . . .
Scottish removing1, as it did, at least in part, from the
Catholics. .
national statute-book a code of laws which had
long disgraced it in the eyes of every friend of
1 Hansard, Parliamentary History, vol. xxx. 766 (April 23, 1793).
2 Butler, Historical Memoirs, vol. iv. p. 109.
CONSECRATION OF ALEXANDER MACDONALD. 247
humanity.1 The three Scottish bishops, writing
to Pius VI., on July 8, 1793, gave expression to
their feelings of joy at recent events ; 2 and Bishop
Hay manifested his own sense of gratitude to
wards the Government by the publication of a fine
pastoral letter, in which he set forth the duty
of loyalty to the state, and expressed his desire
that public prayers should be offered for the king.
Amid all the anxieties and labours attendant
labours of
on his efforts to obtain the emancipation of his Bfchop
Catholic countrymen, the good bishop never re
laxed in his zealous endeavours to extend and
improve the missions committed to his care.
John Macdonald, Bishop of Tiberiopolis and
vicar -apostolic of the Highlands, had died in
1779, and Alexander Macdonald had been nom
inated by Propaganda as his successor. On
March 12, 1780, he was consecrated at Scalan Consecra-
.
by Bishop Hay.3 The latter prelate, in his
report to the Sacred Congregation, dated three
tion of
1 " There is no more humiliating chapter," observes Cunningham
(Church History of Scotland, vol. ii. p. 543), " in our country's legis
lation than those penal statutes against the down-trodden Romanists.
. . . They were to be a proscribed and outcast race, denied not
only the right of fellow-citizens, but the charity which is generally
extended to the most worthless of our fellow-creatures. William
of Orange, notwithstanding his tolerant principles, put his name to
this Act."
2 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scritture riferit. iii., 8 Luglio 1793. '" Le
leggi penali contro i Cattolici nostri . . . sono finalmente per la
divina providenza, e per il favore del nostro governo, quasi del
tutto annullate."
3 Brady, Episcopal Succession, vol. iii. p. 467.
248 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
days later, referred to the strong opposition that
had been shown to the appointment of Bishop
Macdonald in favour of another priest of the same
name, who found himself disappointed in the ex
pectation which he had allowed himself to enter
tain of succeeding to the vacant dignity.1 Some
months previously the Holy See had named, as
coadjutor to Bishop Hay in the Lowland dis-
JohnGed- trict, John Geddes, rector of the seminary in
des, coad-
Sfch*0 kpam, recently removed from Madrid to Valla-
dolid. Charles III, King of Spain, did not in
clude in the decrees for the confiscation of Jesuit
property such establishments as had been merely
under the administration of the Society. In com
pensation, therefore, for the loss of the seminary
at Madrid, the Spanish Government, after some
delay, made over to the Scottish mission the fine
Jesuit College at Valladolid, formerly the resi
dence of the renowned Suarez; and in 1772
Father Geddes was sent out by the vicars-apos
tolic with twelve students, to take possession of
the new institution.2 The rector, who was a
man of singularly humble and unpretending
character, received the news of his nomination
1 Archiv. Prop., 15 Marzo 1780. " Scalan ... in questo luogo
dove ci fummo accordato di venire per sua consagrazione." Re
ferring to the rival candidate for the vicariate, the bishop continues :
" Vedendo per5 che 1'affare pareva di andare contro alia sua speranza,
fece vedere un disgusto che ben mostrava esser egli stato troppo
affezionato alia dignitk vacante."
2 Forbes, in Edinburgh Review, Jan. 1864, pp. 196, 197.
THE COLLEGES AT HOME AND PARIS. 249
to the episcopate with dismay, and at first with
refusal. Finally, however, he yielded to the ex
press command of Cardinal Castelli, and was
consecrated Bishop of Marocco at Madrid, on
November 30, 1780, by the Archbishop of Toledo,
assisted by the Bishops of Urgel and Almeria.1
Among the most pressing matters which called
for the attention of the Scottish bishops at this
time was the position of the two national colleges
at Rome and Paris. For some time past the
Paris seminary had fulfilled but very imperfectly
the end of its original foundation ; while the
college at Rome had suffered much by the sup
pression of the Society of Jesus, whence the
rectors had always been chosen, and by the sub
sequent appointment of Italian secular priests as
superiors of the establishment.2 The need was
1 Brady, Episcopal Succession, vol. iii. p. 461.
2 Forbes (Edinburgh Review, Jan. 1864, p. 194, note) gives the fol
lowing list of rectors of the Scotch College in Rome :— 1615, Patrick
Anderson : 1622, Geo. Elphinstone : 1644, "William Christie : 1646,
Francis Dempster : 1649, Andrew Leslie : 1652, Adam Gordon :
1655, Gilbert Talbot, or Geo. Bisset : 1658, F. Dempster, bis : 1663,
Gilbert Talbot, bis : 1670, John Strachan : 1671, Hector de Marinis
[Marini] : 1674, W. A. Lesley : 1688, Andrew Mackay : 1692, W.
A. Lesley, bis : 1698, James Forbes : 1701, D. Calcaneus [Calcagni] :
1704, J. B. Nasellus [Naselli] : 1708, Thomas Fyffe : 1712, W. Clerk :
1721, Alex. Ferguson : 1818, Paul Macpherson : 1826, Angus Mac-
donald : 1834, Paul Macpherson, bis : 1846, Alex. Grant : [1880,
James Campbell]. From 1724 until the suppression of the Jesuits,
the rectorship was held by Italian Fathers of the Society ; and after
that event until 1818, by Italian secular priests. F. Gritta (ap
pointed in 1724) and his successors appear to have governed the
college, on the whole, well and wisely ; and it was the malad
ministration of the secular rectors who followed them, rather than
250 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
also greatly felt of some alterations, corresponding
to the requirements of the times, in the missionary
statutes of Bishop Nicolson. With a view to the
visit of settlement of these important questions, Bishop
Hay to Hay made a visit to Borne in 1781. He travelled
Rome, •>
by way of Belgium, resting at Brussels and after
wards at Spa, where he met the Papal nuncio
and the Princess of Stolberg, mother-in-law of
Charles Edward Stuart. From Spa the bishop
continued his journey to Aix-la-Chapelle, Cologne,
Wurzburg, and Ratisbon, receiving in the two
latter cities a hospitable welcome from the Scotch
abbots, Mackenzie and Arbuthnot. In September
1781 he arrived at Rome.
Proposed One of the points submitted by Bishop Hay for
iueutsto the decision of Propaganda had reference to the
the Statuta . .
ofNicoi- share assigned to the missionary clergy, by the
statutes of Bishop Nicolson, in the administration
of the property of the Church. From the word
ing of the dubia proposed to the Sacred Congre
gation, it would seem that Bishop Hay desired
the right of nominating the administrators to be
confined to the vicars-apostolic — a view which,
judging from the reply of the consult or charged
with the examination of the question, appears to
have been considered not unreasonable by the
Roman authorities.1 The bishop also laid before
the fact of their being foreigners, that would seem to have chiefly
influenced the vicars-apostolic in their efforts to obtain the appoint
ment of a Scotchman to the post. — TRANSLATOR.
1 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scritture riferit. ii. " Dub. 2. An
STATE OF THE SCOTCH COLLEGE, PARIS. 251
Propaganda an accurate account of the condition
of the Scotch College at Paris ; and this was The Scotch
College at
embodied by the secretary in the report which he Paris,
presented to the Congregation on January 18,
1782. Up to the time of Bishop Nicolson's death
(1718) the college had sent out many excellent
students to the Scottish mission. But in the
vicariate of his successor, Bishop Gordon, the
baneful influence of Jansenism had spread far and Leanings
towards
wide, and the superiors of the college in Paris Jansenism.
had been suspected of a strong bias in favour of
the erroneous tenets. As a natural consequence,
the missionaries educated there followed in the
same track, and thus was formed a powerful party,
more or less antagonistic to the ecclesiastics
who had received their training in Home. The
superiors of the college continued to enjoy the
favour of the vicar-apostolic, and were not slow to
profit by this circumstance. They strengthened
their position still more by the method which they
employed in investing the funds belonging to
the college : inasmuch as it was set forth in legal
documents that the funds in question were the
property of the superiors — a statement quite
aliqua potestas bona Missionis temporalia communia administrandi
secundum Ecclesise leges in ipso corpore missionariorum resideat ?
Dub. 3. Utrum ad ipsos missionaries, an ad Vicarios Apostolicos,
pertineat nominare quos dignos et idoneos judicaverint, qui in
officium administrations eligantur ? " The consultor concludes his
answer as follows : " Ex quo exorbitans videri non debet facultas,
quarn vindicant sibi in casu nostro Vicarii Scotise pro administi'andis
bonis illius missionis."
252 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
opposed to the real fact. Shortly after the
Jacobite rising of 1745, the subscription of the
clergy had been again required, after several
years' disuse, to the formula of orthodoxy which
had been imposed under Pope Alexander VII.,
and extended by Clement XII. in 1736.1 All the
missionaries at once subscribed the document, with
the exception of a few members of the so-called
" Paris party," who only complied after much
delay. Among these reluctant signatories Bishop
Hay mentions Alexander Gordon, the actual rector
of the college in Paris, James Macdonald, and
Alexander Geddes. The bishop refers to the sin
gular sterility resulting from the Jansenistic bias
of the college, pointing out that during the long
interval from 1739 to 1764 it had not furnished
a single priest to the Scottish mission.2 He like
wise deplores the fact of many of the seminarists
having entered the army, while others after their
return home brought disgrace on the Church by
their apostasy. The financial circumstances of the
1 See ante, p. 203.
2 Archiv. Propag. Acta, fol. 10, 18 Januar. 1782. "I superior!
del Collegio di Parigi diedero forse motive di sospettare, che fossero
molto attaccati al partito del Giansenisti, e per la consuaguenza
tutti i missionari, che venivano da quel collegio, erano dell' istesso
sentimento coi loro maestri, e formarono un partito assai potente
nella missione contro tutti quelli che stavano dall' altra parte, cioe
i missionarii venuti dal collegio di Roma." Ibid., fol. 30. " Dall'
anno 1737 fino al 1764 il Collegio di Parigi non diede alia Scozia
alcun missionario." Decret. " Scribatur ab Emo- Prsefecto juxta
mentem Nuntio Parisiensi." The gathering storm of the Revolution
rendered any reform of the college impossible.
RESULT OF HAY'S VISIT TO ROME, 1781. 253
college are also described as almost hopelessly
embarrassed.
Other questions brought by Bishop Hay before Results of
the Holy See, during his visit to Eome, had refer- Hay's visit
J to Rome.
ence to the issue of a new ritual for Scotland,
and an increase of the annual grant made to the
mission by Propaganda. With regard to both
these points his efforts were successful.1 A
ritual, drawn up by himself, was afterwards
printed in London, and formally approved by
the Congregation. His proposed amendments
to the Statuta of Bishop Nicolson were likewise
sanctioned in April 1782 by the Congregation
appointed to examine them, and were printed at
the Propaganda Press.2 Unfortunately, one of
the chief wishes of Bishop Hay and his episcopal
colleagues was destined to remain unfulfilled.
Soon after the suppression of the Society of
Jesus, Cardinal Marcfoschi, the protector of the
Scotch College in Rome, finding it impossible to
procure a suitable rector among the Roman
secular clergy, had desired the Scottish bishops
to select a fit person from the number of their
own clergy. The bishops, however, had im-
1 An annual subsidy of 200 crowns was voted for the mission.
Life of Bp. Hay (apud Gordon, Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 213). —
TRANSLATOR.
2 Instructiones ad munera Apostolica rite obeunda, Missionariis
Scotice accomodatce. Cf. Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scritt. riferit. iii.
29 Agosto, 1792. " L'edizione degli statuti della nostra missione
sark di somma utilitk ai nostri missionari."
254 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
prudently declined to comply with this request :
an Italian priest was again appointed, and in
spite of the subsequent efforts of the vicars-
apostolic, who recognised too late their mistake,
the college continued to be ruled by Italian
superiors, with very indifferent success, for up
wards of forty years. In a letter addressed to
Pius VI. from Aberdeen, on February 12, 1782,
Bishop Hay depicted in lively colours the detri
ment caused to the colleges by the determination
of the Cardinals not to permit the appointment
of national superiors.1 Towards the middle of
April the bishop took his departure from Home,
having previously sat for his portrait, which still
adorns the library of the Scotch College.
Labours of On his return to his northern home, Bishop
Bishop
Ss^oT-d -^ay resumed with unabated energy the dis-
:agues. charge of his episcopal duties. By the month
of August 1782, the three vicars-apostolic were
able to report to the Holy See that the amended
mission statutes were in successful operation.
They mentioned at the same time that they had
themselves each undertaken the charge of a mis
sion — an addition to the burden of their ordinary
duties, which was necessitated by the scanty
1 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scrittur. riferit. iii., 12 Febbrajo 1782.
" Ora, Bm°- Padre, tutte queste cose, il cattivo maneggio del Collegio,
la rovina di tanti giovani, lo scialacquamento del beni non sono
nascosto dal publico. . . . Ecco le disgrazie . . . dalla risolu-
zione presa dagli Emmi- Protettori di noil ammettere superior!
nazionali nei Collegi."
STATE OF THE SCOTTISH MISSION, 1782. 255
number of the clergy, as well as by the unsatis
factory financial condition of the Church in Scot
land. It may well be conceived, therefore, with
what gratitude the bishops received the an
nouncement of an extraordinary annual grant Subsidy
J from Pro-
from Propaganda of two hundred scudi. The pagauda.
need that existed of some such additional sub
sidy is forcibly shown by various incidents re
corded with reference to the labours undertaken
by the bishops at this time : among others, that
Bishop Geddes made the long and fatiguing
journey to Orkney entirely on foot. For the
rest, the state of the mission was on the whole
satisfactory ; for not only did a spirit of perfect
harmony prevail among bishops, clergy, and
people, but the period, like that previous to the
Jansenistic troubles, was also signalised by nu
merous conversions. We learn, moreover, that
the Duke of Gordon, elder brother of the mis
guided enthusiast who had been chiefly respon
sible for the outbreak of 1780, showed much
indulgence to the large number of Catholic
tenants on his estates, and interested himself in
their welldoing.1 The personal ties which Bishop
1 Ai*chiv. Propag. Scozia, Scrittur. riferit. iii., 8 Agosto 1785.
The joint letter, under this date, from the three Scottish bishops
to Propaganda, gives a detailed account of their various mis
sionary journeys. It concludes thus : " Abbiamo molti motivi
di ringraziare Iddio per la pace che adesso godiamo. Fra gli
altri il Duca di Gordon, il di cui fratello ha fatto tanto fracasso,
e nei di cui stati vi sono piu di cinque mila cattolici, dov' 6
situate ancora questo Seminario di Scalan, ci favorisce." So, writ-
256 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
Hay had formed, during his residence in London,
with various persons high in authority, had had
the effect not only of favourably disposing the
Govern- Government towards the relaxation of the penal
nient grant
to the laws, but also of securing substantial material
Scottish
mission, support for the Catholic clergy in Scotland.
Each of the two vicars-apostolic was to receive
£100 annually, and the coadjutor £50 ; while
£50 were also to be granted to the two seminaries
at Scalan and Lismore, in addition to a capital
sum of £600, to defray the debt incurred in their
erection. Unfortunately, the payment of these
sums, which was made from the first with great
irregularity, was after a few years suspended
altogether ; nor can we doubt that the original
concession was dictated by motives of political
expediency, rather than by any real sense of
what justice required.
The scotch Much anxiety devolved upon the Scottish
bishops . .
and the bishops about this time in connection with two
Catholic
oath. important matters : the first of these being the
lawfulness of the form of oath proposed by
Mr Pitt to the English Catholics, and the second
the critical condition of the national colleges at
Paris and Rome. The body known as the
Catholic Committee had some time previously
urged on Pitt a further repeal of the disabilities
ing from Scalan on July 27, 1787, the bishops report as follows :
" Nam et missionarios munere suo diligenter fungi videmus, et non
pauci heretici ad Ecclesise gremium revertuntur."
THE PROPOSED CATHOLIC OATH, 1789. 257
affecting Catholics, to which the Minister rejoined
by requesting for an opinion from the Catholic
universities with regard to the alleged Papal
power of dispensing subjects from obedience to
their sovereign. Replies which were considered
satisfactory having been obtained from the Sor-
bonne, Louvain, Douai, Alcala, and Salamanca,
the draft of a new relief bill was duly prepared
in April 1788. So far all went smoothly ; but in
the following year the Committee submitted to
the Government a form of oath which was con
sidered in many quarters as of very exceptionable
character. Bishop Hay, when consulted by the
vicar-apostolic of London, Bishop Gibson, on the
subject, expressed in decided terms his disappro
bation of the formula, which in his opinion was
equivalent to the oath of supremacy formerly
condemned, and which he believed to be the
work of " pretended friends, or false brethren." l
His coadjutor, Bishop Geddes, expressed himself
in very similar terms ; and the joint opinion of
the Scottish prelates seems to have had con
siderable weight with the bishops in England,
who soon afterwards issued an encyclical in condemna-
i i TJ • n tionofthe
which the proposed oath was unconditionally oath.
condemned.2
1 Life of Bis/top Hay (Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 286). Bishop Hay
to Bishop Geddes : " I would never sign the Paper sent by Bishop
Gibson : besides other reasons, it includes, in my Opinion, an
equivalent to the Oath of Supremacy."
- Ibid,, vol. iv. p. 287.
VOL. IV. B
258 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
The Scotch The unsatisfactory state of the colleges at
College at J
Rome. Rome and Paris continued to be a source of
grave anxiety to the Scottish bishops. In a
letter to Propaganda, dated July 8, 1793, they
observe that during the twenty years that had
elapsed since the suppression of the Jesuits, the
Scotch College at Rome had been rather a
scandal than a benefit to the Catholics of
Scotland.1 " Not only," they wrote to Cardinal
Antonelli a few weeks later, " have we lost, owing
to these circumstances, a number of students of
the highest promise ; but many of these young
men, on their return to Scotland, have given
great disedification to the Catholics by their
Efforts to conduct and behaviour/'2 The bishops were
obtain the _ .
appoint- encouraged to persevere in their reasonable
inent of a
national demand for the appointment of a Scotchman
rector.
to the rectorship of the college, by the rumour
that Pius VI. had resolved, with the advice of
the Congregation, to take a similar step with
regard to the English College.3 But neither
their own representations, nor the efforts of
1 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scritture riferit. iii., 8 Luglio 1793.
"Ma al contrario per questi venti anni passati dal tempo della
soppressione del Giesuiti, e stato [il collegio] di piu scandalo che
benefizio ai Cattolici di Scozia."
2 Ibid., Edinburgo, 6 Agosto 1793. "Abbiamo perduti molti di
ottima speranza. . . . Non pochi di questi ritornando nella patria . . .
diedero grandissimo scandalo ai Cattolici."
3 " Abbiamo sentito che Sua Santita secondo il saggio consiglio di
V. E. e della S. Congregazione ha presa la risoluzione di mettere
snperiori nazionali nei collegi Britannici."
THE SCOTCH COLLEGE AT PARIS. 259
Mr Hippisley, the accredited agent of the English
Catholics at the Curia, nor the influence brought
to bear by Bishop Hay through Mgr. Erskine,
one of the Papal auditors, then resident in
Scotland,1 were followed by the desired result. Their
The continued reluctance of the Cardinal-protector
to comply with the request was not improbably
grounded on a fear lest the influential post in
question might fall to some one of more or less
Jansenistic proclivities.
The state of the Paris College was even less unsatis-
satisfactory than that of the sister seminary in condition
Rome. The strong representations which Bishop Scotch Coi-
Hay. during his last visit to the Eternal City, had p^ris-
made with regard to this establishment, were
abundantly justified in the following years. Gor
don, the principal of the college, not only con
tested the claim of the Scottish bishops to super-
1 Charles Erskine, son of Colin Erskine of Cambo, who came to
Italy with James III., was born in Rome, and entered the Scotch
College in 1748. He did not, however, receive orders, but applied
himself to study the law ; and his successful conduct of a case in
which Pius VI. was much interested first drew on him the attention
of that Pontiff. He was made a prelate in 1782, and appointed
canon of St Peter's and Promoter of the Faith. In February 1803,
after a residence of nine years in England on diplomatic business
connected with the revolutionary troubles, he was raised to the
purple by Pius VII., and three years later appointed Cardinal
Prodatario. On the Pope going into exile in 1809, Erskine, whose
health was much broken, retired to the country, but in the following
year the French compelled him to go to Paris, where he died on
March 20, 1811. [He was buried in the church of St Genevieve
at Paris. — TRANSLATOR.] See Noraes, Elementi della Storia de'
Domini Pontefici, vol. xvi. part ii. p. 193 ; vol. xviii. p. 166.
260 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
vision over the institution, but went so far as to
publish a pamphlet, in which he publicly attacked
Bishop Hay for defending the rights of the episco
pate.1 The chief cause of complaint of the vicars-
againstthe L . .
principal, apostolic against the principal was the arbitrary
and independent manner in which he administered
the property of the college.2 With a view of
putting an end to these abuses, Bishop Geddes
visited Paris in December 1791 ; and at a confer
ence held between himself, Gordon, and the Car
thusian Prior, in presence of Florae, vicar-general
of Paris, the Abbe de Bigaud, and Colbert Bishop
of Bhodez, who had agreed to act as arbiters, the
claims of the principal to independent jurisdiction
were unanimously disallowed.3 A few months
Results of later the college was broken up by the advancing
Revoiu- wave of revolution, and Gordon fled from Paris.
The priceless documents bequeathed to the col
lege by Archbishop Beaton of Glasgow, more than
two centuries before, were almost all destroyed.4
1 Me'moire de M. Gordon, Principal du College de Ecossois d Paris,
pour servir de response a Vinvective de M. I'Eveque Hay, contre les
supe'rieurs et e'leves du dit College. 1785.
2 Owing to the unsatisfactory state of the college, the Scottish
bishops, at Bishop Hay's instance, had decided to send no more
students thither from Scotland ; to which the principal (supported
by the Carthusian Prior) retaliated by arresting the French funds
belonging to the seminary at Scalan. — TRANSLATOR.
3 Life of Bishop Hay (Scotichronicon], vol. iv. p. 328. Archiv.
Propag. Scozia, Scritture riferit. iii. Bishop Geddes to Cardinal
Antonelli. Douai, April 30, 1792. "II Signor Gordon, il quale
trattava tutti i suoi beni e trasferigli altrove, se avesse potuto senza
neppur consultarci o dirci, dove voleva andare."
4 Michel, Les Ecossais en France, vol. ii. p. 534. See ante, vol. iii.
p. 328, note.
DEATH OF BISHOPS MACDOXALD AND GEDDES. 261
"Writing to Propaganda on April 19, 1797, the
Scottish bishops declared that they had lost the
whole of their property in France, that the annual
subsidy from Rome had been, in consequence of
the fall of exchange, reduced to a third of its
former value, and that to supply the needs of the
mission they had been obliged during the past
three years to contract a debt of more than two
hundred pounds.1
The last decade of this century witnessed the Death of
death of two of the Scottish bishops. Alexander Alexander
Macdonald
Macdonald, vicar-apostolic of the Highlands, died
on September 9, 1791 ; and his successor, John
Chisholm, was appointed by brief dated November
8, and consecrated at Edinburgh on the twelfth
of the following February by Bishop Hay, assisted
by two priests. Bishop Geddes closed his long
and laborious life at Aberdeen on February 11,
1799. In consideration of the continuous illness
which had incapacitated him for the three pre
vious years, Pius VI. had, on September 1797,
nominated as coadjutor to Bishop Hay Alexander
Cameron, who was consecrated at Madrid in
October 1798.2
We have arrived at the close of the eighteenth JJJjJgf of
century. The spirit of the times was changing
1 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scritture riferit. iii. " La total perduta
di tutto quello che possedevamo in Francia, ed il carnbio avendo
ridotto quasi alia terza parte quello che si receveva dalla carita
della S. Sede, ci ha costretti per i tre anni passati a contrar un
debito di piu di due cento lire sterline."
2 Brady, Episcopal Succession, vol. iii. pp. 466, 467, 462.
262 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
fast, and the penal laws had altogether failed to
carry out the purpose for which they were enacted.
In face of the silent revolution which was being
brought about, in public life in general, by the
progress of civilisation, and within the pale of the
Presbyterian Kirk, by the slow but irresistible
force of dissolution and decay, it was impossible
that these laws could be longer maintained or up
held. Notwithstanding the inhuman treatment
which a not inconsiderable section of the Scottish
people had for more than two centuries endured
on account of their religion, the Catholic Church
in Scotland included in 1800 two bishops,1 forty
priests, twelve churches, and some thirty thousand
of the faithful. She had come forth from the fire
of persecution purified and strengthened ; and it
was in no mere empty form of words that the
Scottish bishops, in a letter forwarded to Rome
through Mgr. Erskine in August 1799, extolled
the Divine Providence which had overruled for
good the malice of their enemies, and expressed
their fervent wish that their people might con
tinue in the future to render themselves worthy
of the protection of heaven.2
1 As a matter of fact there were, as is evident from the preceding
paragraph, three, not two, bishops in Scotland in 1800 : Bishop Hay
and his coadjutor Bishop Cameron, and Bishop John Chisholm. —
TRANSLATOR.
2 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scritture riferit. iii., 16 Aug. 1799. "O
quanto ammirabili sono le opere della divina Providenza ! Venti
anni sono brucciarono le nostre case e capelle, e adesso ci ajutano di
fabbricare capelle e collegi ! Piaccia a Dio di darci la sua grazia,
TYRANNY OF THE KIRK. 263
The effects, on the other hand, produced in the influence
' ' r . ofPresby.
spiritual life of the Scottish nation by the domi- teriamsm
on the
nant religious system of the eighteenth century JJJjJJjJ,
are thus depicted by an able modern writer :
" A people in many respects very advanced, and
holding upon political subjects enlightened views,
do, upon all religious subjects, display a littleness
of mind, an illiberality of sentiment, a heat of
temper, and a love of persecuting others, which
shows that the Protestantism of which they boast
has done them no good, and that it is unable to
free them from prejudices which make them the
laughing-stock of Europe, and which have turned
the very name of the Scotch Kirk into a byword
and a reproach among educated men." l
In truth, there probably never existed among Tyranny of
P i the Kirk.
a civilised people a system of espionage like that
of the Presbyterian Church, extending as it did
its authority to even the most intimate relations
of human society. Nothing could escape the
vigilant eyes of the ministers, whose agents not
only paraded the streets, but invaded the privacy
of the domestic circle in order to make sure that
none absented themselves from the preaching.2
In every relation of life the ministers claimed a
right to interfere, and a decisive voice. The
writer already quoted has described the effect
di corrispondere come si deve a tanta bonta, e di renderci degui
della continuazione della sua divina protezzione."
1 Buckle, History of Civilization, vol. iii. p. 185.
2 Ibid., p. 209.
264 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1760-1800.
wrought on the Scottish character by its long
contact with this baneful system. " The clergy,"
he says, " deprived the people of their holidays,
their amusements, their shows, their games, and
their sports ; they repressed every appearance of
joy ; they forbade all merriment ; they stopped
all festivities ; they choked up every avenue by
which pleasure could enter ; and they spread over
the country an universal gloom." l " Few forms
of religion," writes Lecky, speaking of the Estab
lishment in Scotland, " have been more destitute
of all grace or charm, more vehemently intoler
ant, and at the same time more ignorant and
narrow." : And the more inordinate and unrea
sonable the claims put forward by this singular
body, the more decisive has been the inevitable
reaction which our own century has witnessed,
and the more widespread the spirit of doubt and
infidelity which has been thereby fostered and
encouraged.
1 Buckle, History of Civilization, vol. iii. p. 269. Cf. Dollinger,
Kirche und Kirchen, pp. 129, 259 et seq.
2 Lecky, Hist, of England in the Eighteenth Century, vol. ii. p. 78.
265
CHAPTER V.
THE CHURCH IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY, TO
THE RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF THE HIERARCHY
(1800-1878).
THE close of the eighteenth and opening1 of the state of
r. & Great Br
nineteenth century found the attention of British tain at the
J opening 01
statesmen largely occupied with questions of ex-
ternal policy. Nothing less was at stake than tury>
the overthrow of that extraordinary man, who
had indeed in France curbed the hydra of revo
lution, but had thereafter kindled the flames of
war in almost every country of Europe, and shat
tered almost every established form of govern
ment. Dynasties, in which a people's affections
had been centred for generations, were over
thrown in a day, and the kinsmen of the con
queror seated on the abandoned thrones : the
usages of centuries were ruthlessly swept away,
and the most priceless treasures of art were
brought from the pillaged capitals to the im
perial palace on the Seine, to swell the triumph
and the grandeur of the victor. A second Attila
seemed to have appeared from the mountains of
266 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
Corsica, armed with a divine mission to recall the
nations, plunged in the torpor of rationalism and
England indifference, to the realities of life. England,
and Napo
leon, with her deep-seated Conservative traditions, had
made it the foremost object of her policy to op
pose to the death the insatiable ambition of the
Corsican conqueror, whose aim was nothing lower
than to tread in the footsteps of William of Nor
mandy, and to strike terror into British hearts,
even in their sea-girt home. In presence of such
a crisis, all questions of internal policy were
reduced to secondary importance ; and it was
no longer possible that the Catholic subjects of
the king should continue to be treated as they
had been in the two preceding centuries. In his
long-cherished design of effecting a landing on
the coast of Ireland, Napoleon was doubtless
greatly influenced by the hope of profiting by the
traditional antipathy between the Irish and the
English races ; and it became therefore incumbent
on the Government of Britain to take away as far
as possible every cause of religious dissension
within the realm. Nay, more, incredible as such
a thing might have seemed a generation before,
The French the exiled and proscribed clergy of France found
clergy in
England, a hospitable welcome at the hands of the British
public, and their immediate wants were supplied
by the State.1 " No one," said Bishop Horsley,
1 See Jervis, The Galilean Church and the Revolution (1882), pp.
223-228.
EMIGRANT FRENCH CLERGY IN ENGLAND. 267
a prelate of the Anglican Church, preaching be
fore the House of Lords on January 1793, " has a
better claim to this proof of our affection than
these men, from whose doctrines and observances
we are so widely sundered. These estimable prel
ates and clergy of the fallen Church of France
have won a place in all our hearts by the edify
ing example which they have given of patience
under the sufferings w^hich they are now enduring
for conscience' sake." l The University of Oxford
published for the special benefit of these homeless
priests an edition of the Vulgate New Testament,
and every one of them received a copy.2 Numer
ous conversions among the leading families of
England, in which the exiled abbes filled the
humble office of teachers of French, and the
foundation of many new missionary centres up
and down the country, were among the blessings
which the Church in England owed to the whirl-
o
wind of revolution, which had at one time threat
ened to tear the venerable Church of France from
its roots. During his residence in London in
1794, Bishop Hay had entered into communica
tion with Mgr. Colbert, Bishop of Rhodez, and
Mgr. St Paul de Leon, Bishop of La Marche, with
reference to the employment of some of the emi
grant French clergy on the Scottish Mission.3 A
1 The Gallican Church and the Revolution, p. 274.
2 Bishop Patterson, On some reasons for not despairing of a
national return to the faith (Dublin Review, 1881, p. 211).
3 Life of Bishop Hay (apud Gordon, Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 369).
268 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
short time afterwards we find six of these good
O
priests labouring in the Lowland vicariate.
Gradual In Scotland as well as in England, the Catholic
develop-
tTnci°f Church was permitted by her enemies to enjoy at
Ian?01 ^is time at least a temporary truce ; and in the
comparative freedom thus conceded to her, was
enabled to make some progress in the work of
development and organisation. " There still con
tinues in Scotland," wrote the learned Chalmers
in 1810, " the remains of the most ancient Church,
after all the efforts of reformation, all the harsh
ness of severity, and all the influences of kindness ;
so difficult is it to eradicate the religious habits of
O
a people. The Roman Catholics of Scotland are
ruled by several bishops, who are apostolic vicars,
like the Eoman Catholic bishops in England, and
are allowed each a coadjutor when age or infirmity
requires assistance. . . . These Roman Catholics
are generally poor and helpless, quiet and inoffen
sive, which are qualities that anywhere merit and
receive the protection of wise governments." 1
Ecciesias- The number of Catholic churches in Scotland in
tical sta
tistics, 1800 amounted, as has been already observed, to
1800.
twelve, which were served by three bishops and
forty priests. An accurate picture of the con
dition of the Church at this time is furnished by
Report of the replies sent to Propaganda by Bishop Hay,
Hay, 1804. in a letter from Preshome dated August 15, 1804,
in answer to a long list of queries submitted to
1 Chalmers, Caledonia, vol. ii. p. 28.
REPORT OF BISHOP HAY, 1804. 269
him by the Congregation. The persecution of
Catholics, he reports, was at an end, and they were
permitted the free exercise of their religion. The
Latin rite only was known and followed in Scot
land. The missionaries, who numbered in the
Lowland district eight -and -twenty, all natives of
the country, were removable at the will of the
bishop. All were of exemplary life, and with the
exception of three who were engaged in the
seminaries, faithfully fulfilled the duty of preach
ing and administering the sacraments. They
received their faculties from the vicars-apostolic, to
whom also they looked for their means of support ;
and each missionary received from the common
fund the sum of ten pounds annually, which,
however, was far from sufficient for his main
tenance. There were no regular clergy, and no
convents of nuns in the country. The Catholic
laity held no communion with Protestants, nor
did they frequent their churches : they frequently,
however, contracted marriage with Protestants,
but always before a Catholic priest.1 Bishop Hay
1 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scritture riferit. iv., Preshome, 15
August 1804. " 19. Habebam usque ad nuperrima tempora tur-
bulenta ducenta scuta romana a S. Congregation e, et Coadjutor
habebat centum ; ab illis autem temporibus neque ego, neque
Coadjutor quidquam accepimus. 24. Ritum Latinum solum norunt
nostri Catholic!. 27. Libere permittitur exercitium religionis.
Catholicse. 28. Nullam persecutionem patiuntur Catholici. 31.
Missionarii sunt ad nutum amovibiles. 34. Catholici nunquam
communicant cum haereticis in Scotia, nee eorum ecclesiis utuntur ;
sed contrahunt cum eis matrimonia, coram sacerdote tamen Catho-
270 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
at this time still continued to occupy the foremost
position in the Scottish episcopate, although the
increasing decay of his bodily and mental powers
prevented him from taking any immediate part in
the labours of the mission. His burden had for
Bishop some years been shared by Bishop Cameron, who
appointed had been appointed his coadjutor in 1798, and to
to the Low
land vicar- whom, on August 24, 1805, he formally trans
late, 1805. . . .
ferred, with the sanction of Pius VII., the whole
government of the Lowland vicariate.1 In the
archives of Propaganda is preserved a document,
probably the last in which the name of Bishop
Hay officially appears, embodying an order issued
by the Pope relative to the oath prescribed to the
students of the Scotch College. It is intimated
that the latter are free to transmit to Propaganda,
at whatever time and by whatever means they
please, the annual report which they were re
quired to furnish to the Congregation. At the
same time, the vicars -apostolic are charged to
render a yearly account of the conduct of former
lico. 38. Numerus sacerdotum in nostro districtu est viginti octo,
qui omnes sunt indigenae. 39. Omnes missionarii sunt Scoti, probte
vitse, in praedicando Evangelic et sacramentis administrandis occu-
pantur, tribus exceptis, qui in seminario variis officiis funguntur.
40. Facilitates habent omnes Missionarii a Vicario Apostolico.
Ex redditibus communibus unusquisque sacerdos habet decem
libras sterlinas, quse summa in hac regione . . . nequaquam suf-
ficit. 55. Nulli sunt Missionarii regulares. 57. Eituali utimur
Romano, et Catechismis a nobis editis lingua vernacula. 63.
Nullus est monialium conventus. 68. Preecipua Christianitatis
hujus necessitas est paucitas operariorum."
1 Life of Bishop Hay (Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 447).
THE CHURCH IN THE HIGHLANDS. 271
alumni of the college.1 From the year 1805,
Bishop Hay lived in complete retirement in the
seminary of Aquhorties : and here, on October
15, 1811, he died at the age of eighty- three. Death of
The Catholics of Scotland deplored his loss as Hay, mi.
that of a father, and his name is still held in
veneration among them.
The Highland district, as well as the Lowland, The church
was at this time governed by two bishops, ./Eneas Highlands.
Chisholm having been appointed in 1804 co
adjutor to his brother, Bishop John Chisholm,
the vicar -apostolic of the Highlands. He was
consecrated in September 1805, by Bishop
Cameron, in the seminary of Lismore, which his
brother had established in the island of the same
name off the Argyleshire coast. The condition of
the poor Catholics of the Highlands was at this
period one of great hardship. The famous yelloiv
stick, with which tyrannical apostate lairds had
been wont to drive their tenants to the kirk,2
may indeed have fallen into disuse ; but petty
oppression of Catholics was still only too widely
prevalent. Emigration was the only remedy that Emigration
presented itself for these evils. Large numbers Highland
ers.
1 Archiv. Prop. Scozia, Scritt. riferit. iv. Udienza di Nostro
Signore, 14 Agosto 1807 (Report by Cardinal di Pictro). " Che
sia libero a tutti [gli alunni] di poter scrivere, quando essi vogliano,
e per quelle vie che a ciascuno d'essi possano riuscir comode e sicure.
Si debbono per altro gli stessi Vicarii Apostolici incaricare, che
aimualmente rendano conto nelle loro relazioni de' portamento degli
alunni."
2 See ante, p. 189, note. See also the Tablet, 1881, vol. i. p. 272.
272 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
of Catholic Highlanders left their homes, and be
took themselves, often accompanied by their faith
ful pastors, some to the manufacturing cities of
the south, others to Catholic Canada. The
last and largest body of Highland emigrants
sailed for the New World in 1802, under the
charge of Father Alexander Macdonald, who was
provided with specially extended faculties from
Propaganda, and who subsequently became the
first Bishop of Kingston.1 Bishop John Chisholm,
who died in 1814, was succeeded in the Highland
vicariate by his brother ./Eneas ; and on the
death of the latter in 1818, the vacant dignity
was bestowed on Father Ranald Macdonald, who
was consecrated at Edinburgh in February 1820.
Four years previously, a coadjutor had been
appointed to the vicar-apostolic of the Lowlands,
in the person of Alexander Paterson.
1 Father Macdonald did not actually accompany the party, but
followed them two years later. The whole career of this distin
guished and indefatigable pastor was one of entire devotion to the
spiritual and temporal welfare of the poor Highlanders. He had
procured them employment in Glasgow, until the sudden check to
manufactures, caused by the French war of 1794. He had then
obtained the consent of Government to their organisation as a
Highland corps, known as the Glengarry Fencibles, under his kins
man the young chief of Glengarry ; and he himself was gazetted as
chaplain to the corps, which did good service in Guernsey and Ire
land. Finally, on their being disbanded in 1802, he procured a
grant from the Premier of two hundred acres of Canadian soil to
every Highland emigrant, saw his people sail for their new home,
followed them thither himself, and laboured for many years in their
midst. Bishop Macdonald died in 1840 at Dumfries, while on a
visit to Scotland ; but his body was taken back to Canada, and
interred in his cathedral at Kingston. — TRANSLATOR.
CATHOLIC INCREASE, 1800-1829. 273
The first quarter of the nineteenth century was New
churches,
marked by a gradual but steady development of isoo-1829.
Catholicism throughout Scotland. Between 1800
and 1829, churches were erected in Aberdeen,
Paisley, Dumfries, Dalbeattie, Edinburgh, Glas
gow, Greenock, New- Abbey, Dufftown, Faskna-
dale, Eskadale, Dundee, Moidart, Bunroy, Focha-
bers, Portsoy, Tombae, and Chapeltown. Thus
the ancient faith was once more revived in many
of its former strongholds, while at the same time
the Catholic population was largely augmented
by the immense influx of Irish immigrants. In
Edinburgh and Leith, the Catholics increased increase of
the faith-
from 1000 m 1800 to some 14,000 in 1829 ; while fui.
in Dundee, in the latter year, they numbered
1500, in Perth 500, in Preshome 1400, in Glen-
livat 1500, in Dumfries 1000, and in Aberdeen
3000. The newly erected chapels, numerous as
they were, were far from sufficing for the wants
of the faithful. In a report transmitted to Propa
ganda, on December 22, 1826, Fathers Scott,
Murdoch, Kyle, and Macdonald l showed some
thing of the reverse of the medal, dwelling as
they did on the scarcity of pastors, the scanty
number of churches, and the great poverty of
most of their people.2 Inconsiderable, however,
1 All four were afterwards raised to the episcopate, the two
former as vicars -apostolic of the Western, the two latter of the
Northern District. — TRANSLATOR.
2 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scrit. riferit. iv. " Tot honiinum rnillibus
sat amplse deficiunt ecclesise . . . Catholicorum inopia."
VOL. IV. S
274 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
as was still the number of the clergy, they were
distinguished by a spirit of concord and mutual
charity which could not but console and edify the
whole body of the faithful.1
Father In the year 1821, the Church in Scotland was
Scott and brought somewhat prominently before the public,
Tlie Pro
testant, owing to the action brought by the Rev. Andrew
Scott, the priest at Glasgow, against a periodical
known as Tlie Protestant, for alleged calumny
and slander. Scott, a typical specimen of his
countrymen, into whose head, according to an
English witticism, it is easier to drive a nail than
o
a joke,2 had against the judgment of many of his
fellow-Catholics, reluctant to provoke the slum
bering spirit of Puritanism, undertaken the erec
tion of a large and handsome church in Glasgow,
and had, in spite of many difficulties, carried the
work to a successful issue. This bold proceeding
drew down on him the enmity of the Protestant
press, whose attacks and insinuations became
daily more outrageous, until they culminated in
1 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scrit. riferit. iv. Eeport of James Kyle,
" missionis Scoticante presbyteri, e seminario Aquhortensi, 16 Octobr.
1822. Nemo est qui non solatium aliquod pnegrande percipiat ex
eo quod summa jam inter sese concordia et amicitia consociantur
presbyteri, qui in hac missione laborant."
2 The witticism referred to is, we suppose, Sydney Smith's well-
worn jest about the surgical operation and the Scotchman, which
has so sorely exei'cised our countrymen since its first utterance.
Its application to Mr Scott is not at first sight evident ; at all
events, the good priest may well be excused if he failed to perceive
the humour of insinuations which, if true, would have branded him
as one of the vilest of men. — TRANSLATOR.
ERECTION OF A THIRD YICARIATE. 275
the definite charge against Mr Scott, of having-
o o o
extorted money " from the sweat and sinews and
blood " of his impoverished flock, under threats
of eternal punishment in the world to come.
Damages were claimed from the proprietor of
the paper which had printed these and similar
statements ; and the trial, which took place in
Edinburgh, and excited much interest through
out Scotland, resulted in a verdict in favour of
Mr Scott, to whom two thousand pounds were
awarded as compensation.1 It was to this in
defatigable pastor, afterwards the second vicar-
apostolic of the Western District, that the mar
vellous development of Catholicism in Glasgow
was largely due. By 1829 the Catholic popula- catholic
n i ' • i i • • ! population
tion oi that city had increased to 25,000 ; while ofScot-
that of the whole of Scotland, two years pre
viously, was reckoned at some 70,000 souls, in
cluding the bishops and fifty priests. There were
at this time thirty-one churches, two seminaries,
and about twenty elementary schools. In con
sideration of the continual increase in the number
of the faithful, Leo XII. , by a brief dated Febru
ary 13, 1827, made a new partition of the Scottish
mission, which was henceforth divided into three Of atwlrd
vicariates, the Eastern, Western, and Northern.2 1327.
1 This is hardly correct. The total amount awarded by the jury
was fifteen hundred pounds, and this included the heavy costs of
the action. — TRANSLATOR.
2 The brief, which commences Quanta Icetitia affecti sumus, will
be found in the Bullarium Propaa., v. 22.
276 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
The inherent antipathy of Presbyterianism to
the Catholic Church was stirred up once more by
TheEman- the discussions on the bill which the Government
cipation
Act- was at this time proposing to bring before
Parliament, for the repeal of the remaining
disabilities affecting Catholics. The measure,
first proposed by Fox in 1805, and supported
successively by Plunket, Burdett, and Canning,
did not finally become law until 1829. The
English Tories, throughout the long preliminary
negotiations, showed little sign of liberality or
tolerance towards their Catholic countrymen ;
and the same party that, under William III.
and Anne, had pressed for the enactment of the
most stringent penal laws against them, were
now equally vigorous in resisting the concession of
their civil and political liberties. The rapid rise,
however, of O'Connell to power and influence,
and the extraordinary ascendancy which he in
a short time acquired, were, as is well known,
successful in combating the determination even
of a Peel and a Wellington ; and a satisfactory
measure was very soon laid before the House
Feeling in of Commons. The news of this no sooner reached
Scotland.
Scotland, than the descendants of the Covenant
ers organised anti-Catholic meetings in all parts
of the country. In every town and village of
Scotland were witnessed manifestations of big
otry and intolerance that recalled the days of
James VI. The petition adopted at Edinburgh
EMANCIPATION GRANTED, 1829. 277
against the proposed bill had 18,000 signatures,
a similar one at Glasgow, 37,000. At the same
time there were not wanting more enlightened
citizens, who boldly entered the lists in order
to assist in breaking the yoke from off the
necks of their countrymen. Among those thus
honourably distinguished, may be mentioned
the ex-lord-provost of Edinburgh, Sir William
Arbuthnot, the Dean of Faculty, Sir James
Moncreiff, Dr Chalmers, Lords Jeffrey and
Cockburn, and Sir Walter Scott. Meanwhile,
regardless of popular clamour, the Ministry pro
ceeded with the introduction of the promised
measure. While from outside Parliament peti
tions and even menaces poured in upon the
Government, within the walls of Westminster
party spirit ran no less high. Two of the king's
brothers, the Dukes of Clarence and Sussex,
declared themselves in favour of the bill, while
the Duke of Cumberland uncompromisingly op
posed it. A speech of the Bishop of Gloucester
and Bristol, assailing the Catholics in a strain of
unmeasured invective, was replied to by Sussex
in very severe terms. In the Commons, also,
the debate was long and heated ; but under the
guidance of Wellington and Peel the measure
was successfully steered through both Houses.
On March 13, 1829, it passed the Commons, The Act
and four weeks later the Lords ; and on April March'
1829.
13 it received the royal assent, not, however,
278 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
without many signs of childish and impotent
anger on the part of the monarch.1
Position of The Act of 1829, while it removed the chief
Catholics .......
after 1829. disabilities under which the Catholics had so long-
o
laboured, did not, nevertheless, restore them to a
position of complete equality with their Protestant
fellow-subjects. The prohibition of Jesuits and
monastic orders remained in force, although no
Government has since that time thought it worth
while to interfere with institutions whose useful
ness is very generally recognised in all quarters.
Nor have such inquiries into their working as
successive ministries have from time to time
instituted, at the instance of ultra-Protestant
members of Parliament, been productive of any
Remaining but the most satisfactory results. Among the
ties. grievances of which the Catholics of Scotland,
even after the passing of the Emancipation Act,
were still entitled to complain, was the refusal
of all State support to their schools ; but this has
to a great extent been removed by recent legis
lation. The same may be said of two other
privileges which long continued to be enjoyed by
the Established Church : the first being the so-
Annuity- called annuity-tax, which was formerly imposed
on other religious denominations in favour of
1 The speeches delivered 011 this memorable occasion are printed
in full in the Parliamentary Debates of Hansard (vol. xx. p. 370).
A summary of Peel's great speech is given by Eeinhold Pauli,
Geschichte Englands seit den Friedenschlussen von 1814 und 1815
(Leipsic, 1864) vol. i. p. 478.
CATHOLIC DISABILITIES AFTER 1829. 279
Presbyterianism, but was subsequently abolished
through the efforts of Mr M'Laren;1 and the
second the compulsory publication of banns in Pubiica-
•' * tion of
the parish church, which since 1878 has been no banns.
longer obligatory. Such publication, previous to
that year, had in every case to be made by the
minister of the Establishment, and the penalty of
banishment for life was incurred by any dissenter
from the State religion who presumed to contract
marriage without this preliminary.2 The clergy
of the Established Church were naturally the
only persons who benefited by these stringent
regulations ; and when in course of time that
c>
Church had lost much of its ancient ascendancy,
such claims could not but be resolutely opposed.
The reasonable reluctance felt by a large section
of the population to continue to pay an often
exorbitant tribute to the ministers of a religious
denomination with which they had no sympathy,
paved the way for the important enactment of
1878, which provided that notice given to the
parish registrar, and a certificate issued by him,
1 The annuity-tax was not, as the author seems to imply, a gene
ral impost exacted throughout Scotland, but a local tax devoted to
the payment of the stipends of the Established clergy of Edinburgh.
It was first established in 1661, and was extended in its sphere of
operation by subsequent Acts. On its abolition in 1870, compensa
tion amounting to upwards of £50,000 was paid to the Ecclesiastical
Commissioners by the Corporation of Edinburgh. — TRANSLATOR.
2 The celebrating minister only, not the contracting parties, was
liable to the penalty of banishment : the latter incurred sentence of
fine and imprisonment. The Act referred to in the text is known
as the Marriage Notice (Scotland) Act, 1878. — TRANSLATOR.
280 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
should be sufficient authority for the celebration
of marriage by any minister of religion. In
practice, of course, the effect of this amendment
of the law was by no means identical in the cases
of Protestants and Catholics. To the latter the
public proclamation of banns, as ordered by the
Council of Trent, remained precisely as much of
obligation as before ; whereas the former were
now offered the alternative of receiving the
necessary certificate on payment of a small fee
to a civil official, or having their banns published
in the usual way, but at considerably greater
expense, by a minister of religion. It is not
difficult to conjecture which of these two courses
was likely to be most generally followed.1 It
remains to be mentioned that down to very recent
times no Catholic priest could hold a permanent
appointment as chaplain in a prison, workhouse,
or hospital — a state of things the injustice of
which has repeatedly been represented to the
Home Secretary by the Catholic Union. One
more disabling clause in the Emancipation Act
may be mentioned — one not likely to be con
sidered as a grievance by the Catholics of Scot
land : namely, that declaring them ineligible to
hold the office of Royal Commissioner to the
General Assembly.
The boon of Catholic emancipation once ob-
1 See an article by the author in the Katholilc for 1879 (vol. ii.
pp. 200-221), entitled Edinburgh and Presbyterianism.
FOUNDATION OF BLAIRS COLLEGE. 281
tained, the vicars - apostolic applied themselves Effects of
. Catholic
with redoubled zeal to the work of extending1 and emancipa
tion.
developing the mission ; and new churches and
schools, erected by the voluntary offerings of the
faithful, began to rise in every part of Scotland.
A notable step in advance was taken in 1829,
by the union of the two small seminaries of
Aquhorties and Lismore. Mr Menzies of Pitfo-
dels, a Catholic owning considerable property, had
made over to the bishops, two years previously,
the fine estate of Blairs, in Kincardineshire ; and Foundation
i P . . of Blairs
here, in the place of the two former seminaries, College.
was established a new ecclesiastical college, which
down to the present day has continued to render
signal service to the Church. With a view to
providing for the altered circumstances of the
times, the vicars-apostolic, in a meeting held at
Glasgow on August 14, 1828, issued various
regulations, many of which are still in force,
dealing with the mode of nominating to vacant
bishoprics, the administration of church property,
the appointment of professors, and the discipline
to be observed by the students.1 A point which
had been frequently mentioned in former reports
sent to Rome by the bishops, was the fact that
Scotland did not possess a single convent of nuns.
This reproach was removed, in 1832, by the holy Return of
and zealous priest, Father (afterwards Bishop) women to
...... - . . . Scotland.
Grillis, an eloquent letter from whose pen is
1 Archiv. Prop. Scozia, Scrit. riferit., 1828.
282 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
preserved in the Propaganda archives, communi
cating to Pope Gregory XVI. the project of
founding an Ursuline convent in Edinburgh.
With the sanction of Bishop Paterson, he
travelled through France, Spain, and Italy, in
order to appeal to the generosity of Catholics in
aid of the new foundation ; and among those who
assisted to carry out the work may be mentioned
the Dauphiness, the Duchess of Angouleme, and
the Duchess of Berry. Mr Gillis had afterwards
the opportunity of testifying his gratitude towards
the Bourbon family ; for when the ex-royal fam
ily of France, driven forth by the Revolution of
1830, took up their residence in Edinburgh, he
was able to render them considerable service.
st Mar- The proposal to found the convent at Edinburgh,
convent, under the invocation of St Margaret, excited
the warmest interest and sympathy amongst
Catholics, and even many Protestants promised
a warm welcome to the good sisters, and such
material help as they could afford.1 These
manifestations of respect, as well as the general
admiration excited by the heroic devotion of the
Catholic clergy during the terrible visitation of
cholera in 1832, did much to dispel ancient
prejudices, and to elevate the Church in the
eyes of the Protestant public. Nothing, indeed,
1 Archiv. Prop. Scozia, Scrittur. riferit. iv., Edinburg.,6 Januar.
1832. "Non desunt etiam ex Protestantibus Edinburgi concives
eximii, qui mihimet spoponderunt se laeto animo dictas sanctimo-
niales expectaturos esse, et pro posse sustentaturos."
STATE OF THE CHURCH IX 1832. 283
could have been more emphatic than the ex
pressions of approbation with which the non-
Catholic press described the truly Christian
charity with which the clergy devoted them
selves to the sick and dying during those trying
months.1
Bishop Paterson, the vicar - apostolic of the
Eastern District, died on October 31, 1831, and
was succeeded by Andrew Carruthers, who was
appointed by Gregory XVI. in 1832, and conse
crated at Edinburgh in January of the following
year. In a letter to Cardinal Pedicini, dated a few state of
" the Church
days after his consecration, Bishop Carruthers tes- in 1882.
tified to the complete harmony of spirit that pre
vailed among his clergy, and expressed, in union
with them, his entire devotion to the Holy See.
The Western District, of which Glasgow was the
centre, was at this time worthily administered by
Bishop Andrew Scott, who had been raised to the
episcopate in 1828, and under whose guidance
the Church made notable progress. In the year
1835 the three vicars - apostolic commissioned
1 Archiv. Prop. Scozia, Scrittur. riferit. iv. The following ex
tract from a Glasgow Protestant journal, dated February 25, 1832,
was forwarded to Rome, translated into Italian. " It would be
wrong to pass over in silence the fortitude and Christian zeal mani
fested at this critical time by the Catholic clergy. Day and night,
whenever and wherever their services are required or desired, are
to be found priests at the sick and dying beds, utterly fearless of
contagion. ... A large number of medical men have referred in
terms of high admiration to the zeal and devotion of the Catholic
clergy."
284 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
Father Paul Macpherson, former rector of the
Scotch College in Rome, to carry to the Holy See
a report of the state of religion in Scotland. He
was able to inform the Sacred Congregation that
Catholicism had made considerable advances. In
Edinburgh the number of the faithful had increased
in forty years from 700 to 8000, in Glasgow from
50 to 24,000. The bishops, in the same report,
Poverty of referred in somewhat pathetic terms to the needy
the clergy. . <
condition of the clergy, the majority of whom had
no houses of their own, and were obliged to reside
in the humble cabins belonging to their flocks.
It would, they continued, cause incalculable in
jury to the mission if these poor priests, who
returned home from laborious and often perilous
visits to their scattered people, to a scanty meal
of oat or barley bread, were allowed to quit the
country, with a view of finding elsewhere a some
what easier field of labour. l Two-and-twenty
churches had, it was true, been erected in the
last few years, but of these only a very small
number were free from debt. Where a church
was wanting, services were held, if possible, in
some public hall, which alone could afford the
1 Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scrittur. riferit. iv. " 1. Pochi di essi
sacerdoti hanno casa propria, e per6 sono costretti di soggiomare
ora in uno, ora in un altro miserabile tugurio del loro grege. 2. Da
tutto ci6 si pu6 rilevare il gran danno che risulterebbe alia nostra
santa religione nella Scozia, se ai sacerdoti allevati sui fondi . . .
fosse permesso di trasferirsi in altre missioni, in altri paesi, per menar
ivi la vita con minore fatica."
THE CARDINAL OF YORK. 285
requisite accommodation. The bishops concluded
their report by begging that the legacy of the
Cardinal of York might be handed over to the
mission.1
Mention has already been made in these pap'es The
5 ualof
of Benedict Henry Stuart, widely known and Y°rk.
reverenced, less for his intellectual gifts than for
the kindness and benevolence of his character, as
the Cardinal of York. Born at Rome, on March
6, 1725, and raised to the cardinalate, as has
been already mentioned, by Benedict XIV. in
1747, he filled successively the high offices of
vice-chancellor of the Roman Church, arch-priest ffiseccie-
of the Vatican Basilica, and Cardinal-Bishop of career.
Tusculum. In February 1788, he caused to be
interred with royal honours, in his episcopal city
of Frascati, the remains of his elder brother,
Prince Charles Edward ; and considering himself,
after the decease of his brother, the legitimate
heir of the crown of Britain, he had a medal
struck as a lasting memorial of his claim to the
throne.2 For many years the cardinal was the
dean of the Sacred College, and he assisted at
the conclaves for the election of no less than four
1 In a letter from the Scotch bishops, dated April 9, 1834, it is
stated " praedictum Cardinalem omnia sua bona catholicis regni
Scotise legasse."
2 The obverse of the medal bears a portrait of the cardinal, with
the inscription, HENRICUS • IX • MAGN.E • BRIT • FRANC • ET • HIB •
REX • FIDEI • DEFENSOR • CARD • EP • Tusc. ; while on the reverse
are the significant words, NON • DESIDERIIS • HOMINUM • SED •
VOLUNTATE • DEI.
286 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
Popes. He died at Frascati on July 13, 1807.1
Hisaffec- He had never set foot on the soil of Scotland,
tion for .
Scotland, but he always cherished for that country a warm
affection, which he manifested by bequeathing a
portion of his property to the Scottish Church.
The legacy, however, does not appear to have
been paid, for as late as 1835 we find the vicars-
apostolic making application for it through
Propaganda.
Among the prelates whom the emancipation
of the Catholic Church set free to labour with
renewed zeal for the development of religion in
Bishop Scotland, Bishop James Gillis deserves a fore-
Giiiis. most place. Born at Montreal on April 2, 1802,
of Scottish emigrant parents,2 he returned with
them to Scotland in his fifteenth year, and soon
afterwards commenced his ecclesiastical studies at
Aquhorties. The proficiency in the French lan
guage which he had acquired in early youth
proved subsequently of much service to him in
his frequent and intimate relations with the
Catholics of France ; and we have already seen
the prominent part which he took in the founda
tion of the Ursuline convent in Edinburgh. On
the recommendation of the Scottish bishops, Mr
Gillis was in 1837 named coadjutor to the vicar-
1 Novaes, Elementi delta Storia de' Sommi Pontefici, vol. xiv.
p. 127.
2 His mother was a Miss Langley, a Protestant Episcopalian,
who, however, embraced the Catholic faith not long before her
death. — TRANSLATOR.
BISHOP GILLIS AT KATISBON. 287
apostolic of the Eastern District, and was conse- coadjutor
in the
crated at Edinburgh in July of the following Eastern
J _ 3 District,
year. Soon afterwards he visited Paris, and 1837>
".. . , . . . Bishop
during; his residence there entered into neg-otia- Giiiis in
3 , France,
tions with the French Government for the resto
ration of what remained of the library of the
Scotch College, which he ultimately succeeded
in transferring to the seminary at Blairs. The
account given by the bishop of the necessitous
condition of the Church in Scotland resulted,
after some delay, in the promise of an annual
grant in support of the mission from the recently
founded Society for the Propagation of the Faith.
Mgr. Gillis was frequently invited to preach in
the churches of Paris, and when some years later
(in May 1857) he pronounced in the cathedral of
Orleans the panegyric of Joan of Arc, the mayor
of the city presented to him, as a tribute of
gratitude and admiration, the heart of Henry
II. of England, who died in 1189 at Chinon on
the Loire.1 Between the years 1843 and 1849
the bishop paid several visits to Germany, spend- and in Ger-
ing some days in the ancient Scottish abbey of The Scot-
St James at Batisbon. His business there was atBstfc-
connected with a long - cherished desire of the
vicars-apostolic to bring about the reorganisation
of the establishment, the community of which
was all but extinct, as a seminary for the educa-
1 Gordon, Scotichronicon, vol. iv. p. 488. This interesting relic is
now preserved in St Margaret's Convent, Edinburgh. — TRANSLATOR.
varan
288 CATHOLIC CHURCH IX SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
tion of missionary priests.1 With this view, Bishop
Gillis, having- obtained the concurrence of the
o
last two surviving conventuals — Fathers Benedict
Deason and Anselm Robertson — approached the
Bavarian Government on the subject in August
1848. On the 6th of the following November,
. • r> -i -i i • > i
Govern- the Baron von btrauss signified the kings pleas-
andthe ure that the petition should be refused, owing
Scottish
bishops. t0 the fundamental objections of a legal and
1 Lindner, in his history of the Benedictine writers of Bavaria (p.
232), gives a sketch of the history of the famous abbey of St James,
founded in 1068 by Marianus Scotus, at the instigation of the hermit
Muriherdach. Among the most distinguished alumni of the mon
astery in modern times, he mentions the following : 1. Andrew Gor
don, member of the Munich Academy of Sciences, came to Eatisbon
in 1724, and after travelling in France and Italy, became professor of
philosophy at Erfurt University in 1737. He died in 1750. 2. Bernard
Stuart, born in 1706 of a good Perthshire family, was professed at
St James's in 1726. From 1733 to 1741 he was mathematical pro
fessor at Salzburg, and in 1742 at St Petersburg. In 1743 he
became abbot of Ratisbon, where he died the same year. 3.
Marianus Brockie, professor of philosophy at Erfurt, and afterwards
abbot there. He laboured for twelve years on the Scottish mis
sion, returning later to Ratisbon, where he died in 1756. 4. Gallus
Leith, of good Scottish family, born 1709. He came to Ratisbon
in 1718, entered the Order in 1725, and became professor of the
ology. Returning to Scotland in 1740, he was appointed confessor
to Charles Edward, who sent him to London on a secret mission.
After the disaster of Culloden, he escaped in the guise of a servant
of Von Erdt, secretary to the Bavarian embassy ; but he was subse
quently taken prisoner, and confined for six months in London.
He was released on engaging to quit the country, and returned to
Ratisbon, where he was chosen abbot in 1756, and died in October
1775. 5. Benedict Arbuthnot, born in Aberdeenshire on March 5,
1737, entered Ratisbon in 1748, becoming afterwards director of the
seminary and professor of mathematics and philosophy, and member
of the Academy of Sciences. He was elected abbot in 1776, and
died in 1820.
SUPPRESSION OF THE ABBEY AT RATISBOX. 289
financial nature that existed against it. Special
emphasis was laid on the fact that the estab
lishment, as the property of the Benedictine
Order, had fallen under the law of secularisation
passed in 1803, but that the royal indulgence
had postponed the execution of the decrees until
1817, when a new destination was given to the
monastery by the Concordat which was concluded
in that year. It was added that the king, hav
ing in 1838 waived the claim of the Treasury
to the property in question, it must for the
future be devoted to purposes of education and
instruction.
To these considerations the Scottish bishops Represen
tations
were not unprepared with a reply. The abbey of of the
1 J m J bishops.
St James, they were advised, had been in no sense
included among the secularised institutions, and
in the decrees referred to, dated February 23,
1803, it was not even mentioned — a circumstance
which could only be explained on the supposition
that it was regarded as altogether ex-territorial.
On these and other grounds the bishops addressed
to the Government of Bavaria a further appeal : l
this led to fresh negotiations, and no decisive step
was taken in the matter until many years had
1 " Reclamations aupres du gouvernemerit de sa Majeste le Hoi de
Baviere, centre un arretd du ministere des cultes du 6 Novembre
1848, toucbant le monastere et le seminaire de S. Jacques des
Ecossais h, Ratisbonne. Adressees k Son Excellence le ministre
d'Etat de Baviere par 1'eVeque-coadjuteur de Mgr. le Vicaire-apos-
tolique d'Edimbourg. Imprime comme manuscrit." Liege, 1849.
VOL. IV. T
290 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
Ultimate
fate of the
abbey.
The col
leges at
at Douai
and Paris.
Introduc
tion of
religions
orders by
Bishop
Gillis.
elapsed. At length, in 1862, the abbey, with the
sanction of the Holy See, passed finally into the
possession of the Bavarian Government, which
undertook in return to pay a certain sum as com
pensation. A part of this fund was devoted to
the construction of the fine buildings of the
Scotch College in Rome, opposite the Barbermi
Palace, the old monastery at Ratisbon being
meanwhile made over to the bishop of the diocese
for the purpose of a seminary.1 The Scotch col
leges at Douai and Paris did not survive the
Restoration of 1815. The French Government,
however, took upon itself the payment of a certain
annual sum to defray the expense of educating
eighteen Scottish students in French seminaries,
and this arrangement has continued in force down
to the present time. The administration of the
fund in question is intrusted to an English eccle
siastic residing in Paris.2
In the year 1852 Bishop Gillis, who had just
succeeded to the Eastern Vicariate, on the death
of the venerable Dr Carruthers, stationed at Leith
1 The valuable library of the monastery was divided between the
new episcopal seminary and the Staats-Bibliothek at Munich. A
few only of the most interesting books and documents, including the
Liber Benefactorum, lists of the religious and the alumni, a copy of
Archbishop Hamilton's Catechism, &c., were brought to Scotland
by the last surviving conventual, and are now at Fort- Augustus.
Some of the Eatisbon MSS. are also preserved at Blairs College,
Aberdeen. — TRANSLATOR.
2 Mgr. Rogerson, the ecclesiastic in question, died in 1884. The
fund has been usually administered by French, not English, priests.
The present agent is one of the fathers of S. Sulpice.— TRANSLATOR.
INTERNAL DISSENSIONS IN THE CHURCH. 291
and at Galashiels fathers of the Congregation of
Mary Immaculate, founded by the pious Bishop
of Marseilles, Mgr. de Mazenod ; and seven years
later he established the Jesuits at Edinburgh.
He also introduced the Sisters of Mercy, from
Limerick, to superintend the female schools.
Among the large number of Anglicans to whom
the good bishop was the means of bringing the
light of the Catholic faith, may be mentioned
Viscount Feilding, the present Earl of Denbigh,
who has inscribed on his banner the significant
words, First a Catholic, then an Englishman, and
who has never ceased to devote himself to the
furtherance of Catholic interests with a zeal that
recalls the fairest days of England's chivalry.
Bishop Gillis went to his reward in 1864, his suc
cessor being Dr Strain, the president of the semi
nary at Blairs, on whom Pius IX. conferred the
episcopal consecration on September 25, 1864, as
also upon Mgr. Mermillod, the illustrious vicar-
apostolic of Geneva. Together with his colleagues,
Bishop Macdonald of the Northern District, and
and Bishop Gray of the Western, Dr Strain
assisted at the Vatican Council in 18 69-70. *
During the last quarter of a century, the internal
Catholic Church in Scotland has not been en- iSf
tirely free from internal dissensions, affecting Church,
principally the Western District, and in particular
1 Acta et Decreta sacrosancti et cecumenid Condlii Vaticani
(Friburg, 1871), pp. lix-lxxii.
292 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
Glasgow.1 The Catholic population of this dis
trict was chiefly composed of immigrant Irish,
whom the distress consequent on the famine in
Effects of their own country had driven to find a new home
immigra- in the commercial capital of Scotland, and to
tion to . ,
Glasgow, whom the rapidly increasing industries and man
ufactures of that city offered the best chance of
subsistence. In quitting their native country the
children of Erin laid aside none of their national
characteristics and prejudices, the result being
that, in the beginning of the sixth decade of the
century, clergy and people found themselves
divided into two sharply antagonistic parties.
The Irish priests considered themselves slighted
in favour of their Scottish brethren in the distri
bution of ecclesiastical offices, and they permitted
their grievances to be brought before the public
through the very questionable medium of the
TheCHo*- newspaper known as the Glasgow Free Press,
gpress. whose editor advocated with the most unre
strained freedom of speech the supposed interests
of his party. This enterprising journalist, find
ing that his appeal to the public tended to widen,
rather than to bridge, the gulf that actually ex
isted, proceeded to transmit to Propaganda a
1 The narrative which follows is based chiefly on the negotiations
carried on with the Congregation of Propaganda relative to the
restoration of the Scottish hierarchy, and preserved in the Ristretto
con sommario e nota cCarchivio sulla repristinazione delta gerarchia
in Scozia : ponente 1'em"10- et rev"10- Signer Cardinale Luigi Bilio :
Gennaro, 1878.
VISITATION OF ARCHBISHOP MANNING. 293
memorial, expressing in a very outspoken manner
the views already referred to. Matters soon
reached an acute stage : the Irish clergy forwarded
to Rome, as a supplement to the memorial, a series
of resolutions embodying their various grievances,
while the opposite party presented to Bishop
Murdoch a loyal address, disavowing all concur
rence in the charges of favouritism which had
been brought against him. The bishop was able
to exonerate himself completely from the accusa
tions which had been carried against him to Pro
paganda ; but there can be little doubt that his
death, which occurred in 1866, was hastened by
the agitation consequent on these unhappy dis
sensions. His successor, Bishop Gray, received
from the Holy See, as his coadjutor, an Irish
Vincentian father named Lynch, the hope being irishman
entertained in Rome that the elevation of an jutor-
. bishop in
Irishman to the episcopal dignity might tend to Glasgow.
restore peace among his countrymen in Glasgow.
The result of the step, however, did not justify
the expectations that had been formed ; and there
seemed to be daily greater reason to fear lest the
prevailing divisions might before long develop
into open schism.
In the year 1867 the Congregation of Propa- Arch-
i i i -•• -r-r. . bishop
gancla resolved to institute an Apostolic Visitation Manning
• Apostolic
in the Western District, and the Archbishop of visitor to
the West-
Westminster, Mgr. Manning, was selected to carry £™ctDis~
out this duty. The voluminous report submitted His report.
294 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
by him to the Holy See may be summarised
under the four following heads : 1. The Catholic
population of the Western District had increased
in recent times to a disproportionate extent, and
now equalled that of all the English vicariates
previous to 1850. The ecclesiastical administra
tion lacked the requisite firmness, nor were the
clergy provided with the regulations necessary
for the proper carrying out of their missionary
duties. 2. Until the year 1800 the great major
ity both of clergy and laity in Glasgow were of
native birth. The numerous Irish who had since
settled in the country held themselves greatly
aloof from their Scotch fellow - Catholics, and
according to their organ, the Free Press, desired
a countryman of their own as bishop. 3. Such
a pitch had this national feeling reached among
both Irish and Scotch, that there appeared little
prospect of a fusion of the two parties. 4. The
nomination of an Irish priest as coadjutor-bishop
had tended to increase the disunion, and was
calculated to exercise an influence rather dele
terious than otherwise. Shortly after the pres-
Resigna- entation of this report, Bishop Gray tendered
Bishop his resignation of his office, while Dr Lynch
was appointed coadjutor-bishop of Kildare and
Leig-hlin in Ireland. With the view of secur-
o
ing to the now vacant district the nomination
of a prelate who should stand above both con
tending parties, Propaganda entered into nego-
PROPOSED RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY. 295
tiations with Mgr. Errington, titular Archbishop
of Trebizond, and former coadjutor to Cardinal
Wiseman ; but he declined to accept the dignity.
Mer. Eyre, vicar-sreneral of Hexham and New-
° J . tion of
castle — a prelate universally esteemed for his Mgr. Eyre
•' to the
piety, culture, and indefatigable zeal — was then, ^^"te
at the instance of Archbishop Manning, appointed 1868-
to the Western Vicariate ; and on January 28,
1868, he was consecrated to the titular see of
Anazarba, in the church of S. Andrea della Valle
at Rome, by Cardinal Reisach, assisted by Arch
bishops Manning and Merode. Entering upon
his new duties with the special title and dignity
of Apostolic Delegate from the Holy See, he
succeeded by his tact and prudence in calming
the troubled waters, and restoring to the dis
united mission the peace to which it had so long-
been a stranger.
At the moment when the contest between the Project
Scotch and Irish parties in Glasgow was at its restoration
of the
height, the cry was first raised, on the Irish side, hierarchy.
for the restoration of the hierarchy. It was in
the columns of the Free Press that this demand
was originally addressed to the Holy See, on the
ground that by no other means could the arbi
trary proceedings of the vicars-apostolic, under
which the Irish Catholics were supposed to be
suffering, be effectually restrained. Keane, the
editor of the journal in question, who had for-
ii • i i • -rt 9OW
warded a memorial on the subject to Home, was Press.
296 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
forbidden by Propaganda to discuss the matter
further ; but the prohibition was disregarded, on
the alleged plea that it had not come to hand in
time. A number of the Irish clergy in Glasgow
expressed their concurrence in the views put for
ward by the Free Press. A proposal of such
importance, however, could not, of course, be
entertained without much preliminary negotia
tion, and without consulting the persons most
nearly concerned in the matter, the vicars-apos
tolic of Scotland. Steps were accordingly taken
to obtain their opinion on the suggested change,
as well as that of the metropolitan of the English
Opinion of province. " In my judgment," wrote Cardinal
Cardinal -rTT. • T A -i i •
Wiseman; Wiseman in reply on April 24, 1864, there is
no room to doubt that a thorough change is
required in the ecclesiastical organisation of Scot
land. An increase in the number of vicars-
apostolic would naturally appear to be advisable
in the first place : at the same time, many dif
ficulties would be overcome were the existing
form of Church government to be modified by
of the Scot- the nomination of ordinary bishops." The vicars-
tish vicars-
apostolic; apostolic themselves — Mgrs. Murdoch, Kyle, and
Gray — expressed their unanimous opinion that
no advantage was to be expected to the Scottish
mission from the proposed change, which they
feared would only tend to increase the prejudice
of Arch- which already existed against the development
of the Church in Scotland. Archbishop Manning,
PROPOSED RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY. 297
on the other hand, closed the report of his visi
tation, already referred to, with the following
weighty words : " There seems to me only one
means of remedying the existing evils and guard
ing against them for the future — namely, the
erection of dioceses in Scotland, and the intro
duction of a regular hierarchy." l It was with
the view of smoothing the way for the realisation
of this project that Archbishop Eyre received the
title of Apostolic Delegate, and, previous to enter
ing upon his office, conferred with the Archbishop
of Westminster, who was charged to communicate
to him the necessary instructions.
The negotiations for the restoration of the Scot- Renewal
of the ne-
tish hierarchy, after slumbering for many years, gotiat
were renewed on the occasion of the celebration of
the episcopal jubilee of Pius IX. On May 9, 1877,
a deputation of Scottish Catholics offered to the
Pontiff the congratulations of the body of the faith
ful which they represented, on his attainment of
the fiftieth year of his episcopate. Surrounded by
members of the noble families of Maxwell, Gordon,
Lennox, Hastings, Douglas, and many others,
Bishop Strain, the vicar-apostolic of the Eastern
District, and future Primate of Scotland, read in
the name of his Catholic countrymen an address Ad'dr
• i 1U.S
not unworthy of the occasion. " Filn tui de
longe veniunt" he said. " Distant Scotland, the
Ultima Thule, comes forward with the other
1 Acta Romana : Nota d'Arcliivio, 19.
298 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
nations of the world to offer her homage. Once
a most faithful handmaid of the Holy See, up to
the time of the great apostasy of the sixteenth
century, which among us was brought about
more by foreign influence than by national
causes, she now begins again to put forth blos
soms of faith, and to produce seemly fruits. And
when your Holiness shall be pleased to establish
among us the ecclesiastical hierarchy, as you have
already done in England, there will be given a
fresh impulse to religion, and many will return
to the faith of their fathers."
The Pope's The Pope in reply expressed his satisfaction in
reply. .
welcoming so representative and distinguished a
body of Scottish Catholics, observing that he was
well aware that the literary reputation and noble
buildings of the capital of Scotland had gained
for it the title of the Modern Athens. However
much, he added, he might admire the taste and
culture there displayed, he had infinitely more
at heart the conversion of the Scottish people.
Hitherto he had thought the time not yet ripe
for the restoration of the hierarchy in that
country ; but he cherished the hope that by the
intercession of St Margaret, whom he often in
voked, and the prayers of the Catholics of Scot
land, the happy day might not be far distant.1
Preiimin- A few months later, in September 1877, it was
ary steps
taken by publicly announced that the necessary negotia-
1 Tablet, 1877, vol. i. p. 627.
PROPOSED RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY. 299
tions had already been initiated by the Congrega- Propagan-
tion of Propaganda. Before long Bishop Strain
and Archbishop Eyre were summoned to Rome to
take part in them ; and thither also, at the end
of December, came Cardinal Manning, the Arch
bishop of Westminster, whom a severe illness had
detained for the two preceding months at Paris.
The progress of aifairs was materially facilitated
by the arrival of the last-named prelate, who had
already, as we have seen, rendered such signal
service to the Scottish Church.
The Congregation, in accordance with its tra- Bishop
. . Kyle's ar-
ditional method, took into consideration all the guments
against
arguments both for and against the proposed the pro
posed
measure. Bishop Kyle had already submitted a measure-
detailed category of the objections to the plan,
which may be summarised as follows : 1. The
scanty number of Scottish Catholics, and their Paucity of
Catholics.
dispersion, for the most part, among Protestants.
2. Many Catholics were so only in name. 3. A
large proportion, notably the Irish, had no fixed
domicile, but roamed from place to place, and
finally left the country altogether. 4. The Their
poverty of the faithful, most of whom lived by
the labour of their hands, barely permitted them
to provide for the necessary expenses of the
divine service. 5. It was only possible by dint
of great efforts to maintain the existing ecclesias
tical arrangements, and to meet the heavy debts
that weighed upon the mission. 6. The endeav-
CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
our of the Scottish Catholics ousfht to be to draw
o
closer the ties uniting them with the Holy See,
and not to weaken them by the introduction of
Danger of independent bishops. 7. In conclusion, it would
legal pen
alties, be unwise to leave out of consideration the legal
penalties to which their prelates would render
themselves liable, by the assumption of territo
rial titles.1
Considera- Against these objections to the contemplated
tious ad- .
disced m change, were adduced on the other side a num-
its favour. . , .
her of weighty arguments, which may be briefly re
duced to the following six points : 1 . The measure
would be of manifold advantage to the clergy.
" The late misunderstandings in Glasgow," wrote
a clear-sighted observer, " would never have arisen
if the clergy had been properly organised, if the
bishops had been invested with the authority
belonging to their office, and if both had been
fully impressed with the sense of responsibility
which a regularly constituted Church imposes on
her ministers." 2. Many converts, desirous of
devoting themselves to theological studies, repair
to England, where they find a fully -organised
Church, and thus Scotland suffers serious loss.
3. As far back as 1864, Cardinal Wiseman had
written thus to Propaganda : " There is no doubt
that the dominant Presbyterianism of the country
has had its influence also on the Catholics, who
have consequently lost their fervour in many
1 Acta Romana : Nota d'Archivio, 24, 25.
PROPOSED RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY. 301
ways, and in particular show little liking for
episcopal rule. I am of opinion that these Pres
byterian leanings, which are also not infrequently
apparent in the attitude of the priests towards
their bishops, would be effectually destroyed by
the mere fact of a once more regularly ordered
hierarchy/' 4. The overwhelming majority of
Catholics in the great commercial and manu
facturing towns were poor Irish. " In Ireland
they are held to the fulfilment of their religious
duties by their parish priests, to whom they are
bound by inseparable ties. It is these ties which
are the safeguard of their faith, and where they
are wanting, as in Edinburgh and Glasgow, they
lose themselves among Protestants and unbe
lievers. Without parish priests or bishops, the
hold which their religion has upon them is not
sufficiently firm." 5. A further important con- Aut
si deration was derived from a reference to the on the
T~I i • /~ii i • ot i i T Scottish
iLpiscopalian Church in Scotland. It was on the Episco
palian
members of this body that the erection of a true body-
ecclesiastical hierarchy might be expected to make
the most forcible impression. Their numbers
amounted to some 55,000, nearly all belonging to
the better classes, and in consequence possessed
of considerable influence. A section of the body
was known to approximate both in doctrine and
in ritual observance to the forms of the Catholic
Church ; and it seemed as though before long
there would be but one point of difference be-
302 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
tween Catholics and themselves — namely, the
obedience which the former rendered, and the
latter refused, to the Holy See. Under these
circumstances the revival of a national hierarchy
was greatly to be desired ; and indeed, if they
retained any longer than was absolutely neces
sary ecclesiastical designations borrowed from
heathen countries, leaving Protestants to usurp
the ancient titles, the effect, especially on recent
converts, could not but be highly detrimental,
and might lead to consequences whose extent it
was impossible to foresee.1
Question With regard to the titles of the new bishops,
tSes°pal ^e same difficulty had not now to be contended
with as had arisen at the time of the restoration
of the hierarchy in England.2 There the ancient
titles were in possession of the Established Church,
while in Scotland the Presbyterian was the only
form of Christianity recognised by the State. In
England, as Cardinal Wiseman had truly observed,
only a few over-zealous individuals had showed
themselves urgent for the resumption of the
ancient episcopal titles, for the sake of the sup
posed distinction attached to them — a sentiment
which could but excite ridicule, if it resulted in
no real advantage to the Church. The titles
1 Acta Romana : Nota d'Archivio, 26-33.
2 See, for the most authoritative account of that remarkable epi
sode, History of the Restoration of the Catholic Hierarchy in England,
1871.
QUESTION AS TO THE METROPOLITAN SEE. 303
which were selected by the Holy See for the
revived Scottish bishoprics were, as a matter of
fact, identical, with one exception, with those of
the pre- Reformation sees ; but the choice was
prompted not more by regard for their vener
able associations than by a desire to distribute
the Catholics most conveniently among the vari
ous dioceses. Certain difficulties arose with re- Difficulty
gard to the fixing of the metropolitan see, the metropoii-
honour of which was claimed alike by Edinburgh
and Glasgow. A circumstance in favour of the
latter city was the fact of its being the chief seat
of the manufactures, commerce, and navigation of
the country ; while Edinburgh could plead its
historic claim to metropolitan rank, and its un
disputed position as the centre of the scientific
and intellectual life of the nation, and the head
quarters both of the civil and ecclesiastical ad
ministration. Cardinal Manning supported the
claims of Glasgow, Cardinal Wiseman and Bishop
Strain were on the side of Edinburgh. As a
means of settling the question in dispute, it was
proposed to unite the ancient title of St Andrews
with that of Edinburgh, giving that see preced
ence over Glasgow. To the latter city, on the
other hand, there was either to be annexed an
archbishopric in partibus infidelium, or else Glas
gow itself was to be erected into an archiepiscopal
see, without, however — at least for the time being
—any suffragan bishoprics. The latter proposal
304 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
was ultimately adopted, and was subsequently
embodied in the bull of erection.1
Mode of The method of electing the future bishops was
the also fully discussed in the Nota d'Archivio, and
bishops.
in the report of Cardinal Bilio which was based
upon it. The appointment of the vicars-apostolic,
in accordance with the usual mode of procedure
at the Roman Curia, had always been made by
the Pope, through the intermediary of the Con
gregation of Propaganda. If the Scottish bishops
had been permitted to recommend suitable per
sons to the Holy See, this privilege in no sense
amounted to a right of election in the canonical
sense. Still less could there be any question of
such rights in the case of the laity, although lay
men of noted piety and influence had not infre
quently been consulted by the vicars-apostolic on
the question of the choice of fitting persons for
the vacant dignities. As regarded the future, it
was now the duty of the cardinals to recommend,
in the case of the Scottish Church, one or other
of the systems of episcopal appointment already
Different approved by the Apostolic See. Three methods
methods ,, ,-,,-,. •• , • ,1
sanctioned of filling such appointments are in vogue in those
Holy See: countries which are ecclesiastically subject to
Propaganda. According to the first, the chapter
assembles on a see falling vacant, and nominates
three candidates by secret vote. The selected
iand?E ' names are notified to the metropolitan, or, in
1 Acta Bomana : Nota d'Archivio, 38-42.
DIFFERENT MODES OF EPISCOPAL ELECTION. 305
the event of his see being vacant, to the senior
suffragan bishop, who, together with his col
leagues, deliberates on the qualifications of the
candidates, submitting the result to the Holy
See. These acts are expressly declared, by an
instruction from Propaganda, dated April 21, 1852,
to constitute not a canonical right of election, but
simply a recommendation,1 so that the Supreme
Pontiff is at full liberty to pass over the individ
uals named, and to appoint a more fitting person
to the vacant see. In this way Dr Manning, the
provost of Westminster, was raised to the archi-
episcopate by a motu proprio of Pius IX., to the
exclusion of the ecclesiastics recommended by the
chapter. The method of election followed in Ire- 2. in ire
land rests on a somewhat wider basis. The parish
priests meet along with the canons of the vacant
diocese, and select three candidates, whose names
are submitted to Propaganda together with the
written opinion of the bishops as to whom they
deem most worthy to fill the office. The same
procedure is followed in the case of the appoint
ment of a coadjutor - bishop.2 In the United 3. in th
States,3 Canada, Australia, and — with an insig- states
. _ . and the
nmcant exception — in Nova Scotia, the duty is Colonies
1 Collectio Condi. Lacens., torn. iii. p. 958.
2 Regarding the mode of episcopal election in Ireland, see Briick,
Das irische Veto (Mayence, 1879), and a paper by the author on the
Irish Plenary Council of 1879, in Vering, Archiv fiir Kirchenrecht,
vol. xliii. pp. 55 et seq.
3 Collectio Condi. Lacens., torn. iii. pp. 430, 624.
VOL. IV. U
land.
306 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
incumbent on the bishops of the province of
furnishing every three years to their metropoli
tan and to Propaganda the names of such per
sons as they may consider, after due inquiry, to
be worthy of the episcopate. On a vacancy oc
curring, the bishops notify to the metropolitan
the names of those whom they recommend to
fill it ; they then meet under his presidency, and
the list of candidates is finally settled. Hitherto
the system to be adopted in the case of Scotland
does not appear to have been fixed : in England,
and also in Holland, several years were allowed
to elapse after the restoration of the hierarchy
before the issue of particular instructions for the
decision of this question.1 Nor has any final
resolution been arrived at by the Congregation
Erection of as to the erection of cathedral chapters on the
English model. The author of the report to
Propaganda expressed himself strongly in favour
of such a measure — one which has been forcibly
opposed by the North American bishops — both
for historical and canonical reasons, and recom
mended its adoption in the organisation of the
Scottish hierarchy.2 An additional point, re-
1 The method of episcopal election now prescribed for Scotland is,
in cases where chapters have been canonically erected, practically
identical with that in use in England. Where there are no chapters,
the election is in the hands of the bishops, who vote three several
times, and transmit the names of the candidates to Propaganda in
the order corresponding to the number of votes given to each. —
TRANSLATOR.
2 The cathedral chapter of Glasgow (for a provost and eleven
MEAXS OF SUPPORT OF THE EPISCOPATE. 307
specting the erection of regularly constituted and of
. •, i i -i • canonical
parishes, was held in reserve. parishes.
The support of the Scottish episcopate is de- Means of
rived, as in England and the United States, theepis-
chiefly from the pious offerings of the faithful.
In addition to this must not be forgotten the
allowance made by the Society for the Propaga
tion of the Faith, the annual grant from which
source to the Northern, Western, and Eastern
Vicariates amounted to £380, £306, and; £390
respectively. The vicars -apostolic expressed their
willingness that some deduction should ultimately
be made from these amounts for the benefit of
the new sees. For the same object provision
was made that, for the present, a yearly
catliedraticum of £10 should be paid by every
priest in charge of a mission, the curates contrib
uting £2 each. A collection was besides to be
annually made, the proceeds of which were to
be allowed to accumulate until an income of
£400, from all sources, was secured. The Con
gregation of Propaganda had also hitherto been
accustomed to make an annual grant of £200 to
the vicars-apostolic. From what has been said,
it will be seen that the life of the Scottish prelates
is one of poverty, and that they are but barely
able to meet the claims which must naturally be
•canons) was erected on Jan. 3, 1884 ; and that of St Andrews and
Edinburgh (for a similar number) on Dec. 23, 1885.— TRANSLATOR.
1 Acta Piomana : Nota d'Archivio, 42-52.
308 CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1800-1878.
made on a Catholic bishop, on whom St Paul en
joins the virtue of hospitality, and who at his
consecration replies in the affirmative to the
question, " Wilt thou show thyself kind and
compassionate, for the Lord's sake, to the poor
and to strangers, and to all who are in need ? "
Final re- The result of the preliminary negotiations, of
suit of the . , ,.
which we have endeavoured to give the outline,
was that on March 4, 1878, Pope Leo XIII. issued
his bull Ex supremo Apostolatus apice, by which
was effected the restoration of the hierarchy in
Scotland.2
1 Pontificate Romanum. De Consecr. Electi in Episcopum.
2 Sanctissimi in Christo Patris et Domini Domini LEONIS, divina
Providentia Papa: XIII. litterce apostolicce, quibus hierarchies epis-
copalis in Scotia restituitur. Romse, MDCCCLXXVIII. See Appendix
XIX.
309
CHAPTER VI.
THE BULL OF POPE LEO XIII., EX SUPREMO
APOSTOLATUS APICE, MARCH 4, 1878.
THIS important document may be divided into Buiire-
r> i • • i i • -i 1-1 storing the
two parts, the first being mainly historical, while Scottish
_ • hierarchy.
the latter is of a judicial or directive character.
In the former reference is made to the beginnings
of Christianity in Scotland, under SS. Ninian and
Palladius, to the flourishing state of the Church
under the holy queen Margaret, to its downfall
at the time of the schism of the sixteenth
century, and, finally, to the constant efforts made
by the Holy See to watch over and consolidate
the faithful remnant left in the kingdom after
the overthrow of the old religion. The Pope, it
is added, seeing on the one hand the wonderful
increase in recent times in the number of the
faithful, of priests, churches, missions, religious
houses, and similar institutions, and on the other
the complete liberty now enjoyed by the Church
in Scotland, deems that the time has now come
for restoring to her the normal ecclesiastical
310 THE RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY.
government. The bull then proceeds to enact
as follows :
ovi- 1. The hierarchy is to consist of two arch
bishoprics, St Andrews and Edinburgh, and
Glasgow; and four bishoprics, Aberdeen, Dunkeld,
Whithorn or Galloway, and Argyle and the Isles.
2. The four latter sees are to be suffragans of St
Andrews ; the Archbishop of Glasgow, on the
other hand, is to enjoy the archiepiscopal title
and honour, but no other rights of an archbishop
or metropolitan ; and, so long as he is without
suffragans, he is to attend the Provincial Council
with the other bishops. 3. According to the
Constitution of Sixtus V., Romanus Pontifex,
the bishops must visit the tombs of the Apostles
every fourth year ; and they must duly report to
Propaganda on the condition of their several
dioceses. 4. They shall enjoy all those rights
and privileges which, according to the common
law and the Apostolic Constitutions, appertain to
bishops. 5. Whatever peculiar statutes, privi
leges, or customs were formerly in force are here
by abolished. The new prelates are charged to
make such decrees as are authorised by the com
mon law and general discipline of the Church ;
and the same ample faculties are to be continued
to them as were enjoyed heretofore by the vicars-
ina- apostolic. The Pope now proceeded to fill up
sees. & the newly erected sees by naming to the arch
bishopric of St Andrews Mgr. Strain, former
APPOINTMENTS TO THE NEW SEES. 311
vicar-apostolic of the Eastern District, and to that
of Glasgow Archbishop Eyre. Bishop Macdonald,
the northern vicar - apostolic, was appointed to
Aberdeen ; and John M'Lachlan, George Rigg,
and Angus Macdonald to the sees of Galloway,
Dunkeld, and Argyle and the Isles respectively.
In a consistory, held on March 28, 1878, the
Holy Father announced the happy event to the
assembled cardinals in the following words : " We
rejoice, Venerable Brethren, that it fell to our
lot to satisfy the fervent desires of our beloved
children in Christ, the clergy and faithful of
Scotland, whose devotion towards the Catholic
Church, and towards the Chair of Peter, has
been manifested by many and most signal proofs.
And we firmly trust that this work, now accom
plished by the Holy See, will be crowned by joy
ful fruits, and that, under the protecting care of
the Patron Saints of Scotland, it will be the case
more and more in that region, that her mountains
will be clothed with peace, and her hills with
righteousness for her people." l
In no country, at least of the Old World, has Public
. 1 i • n opinion on
the newspaper press attained to such influence, thePapai
. ^ T act-
in none does it wield so great a power for good or
1 See The Tablet, 1878, vol. i. p. 435. Pasquale de Franciscis,
Discord del Sommo Pontefice Leone XIII. Eoma, 1882, torn. i. p. 33.
" Firmiterque confidimus fore, ut opus ab Apostolica Sede per-
fectum, Isetis fructibus cumuletur, et coelestibus Scotise patronis
suffragantibus, in ea regione in dies magis suscipiant montes
pacem populo et colles justitiain."
312 THE RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY.
for evil, as in England. No event of any import
ance can take place on the stage of public life
without being submitted to the judgment of the
public journals. Thus, we find the erection of
the Scottish hierarchy commented on, in the
columns of the daily papers both in England and
Scotland, with a frankness and freedom from
prejudice, which contrast refreshingly with the
sophistical and unprincipled attacks, systemati
cally directed by the German press, since 1873,
against the teaching and policy of the Church.
The news- " Since it pleases the Pope," wrote the Glasqow
paper press
and the Herald, on September 6, 1877, "to call the
new hier-
bishops, who hold spiritual sway over the Roman
Catholics sojourning in her midst, by titles taken
from her ancient cities, she [Scotland] will allow
him to do so, since it gives him pleasure, and
does her no harm. Scotland will not for a mo
ment deem that her liberties, civil or religious,
are endangered, if Archbishop Eyre calls himself
Archbishop of Glasgow. ... If Pius IX. re
establishes the Roman Catholic hierarchy in this
country, he will only act in accordance with the
principle which has always guided the Roman
See." The unseemly invectives with which the
Rev. Dr Begg denounced the act of the Holy See
drew down on him a scathing rebuke from the
Scotsman,1 together with an inquiry as to whether
he was ignorant of the utter fiasco which had
1 Nov. 23, 1877.
COMMENTS OF THE NEWSPAPER PRESS. 313
resulted from the enactment of the law against
o
ecclesiastical titles in England. The same journal
characterised the restoration of the hierarchy as
a purely internal act of the Catholic Church, and
one with which Protestants had no concern.1
The Times, while admitting into its columns a
letter on the subject couched in somewhat violent
terms, nevertheless took the writer severely to
task for the views he expressed, and frankly ad
mitted that the projected change of ecclesiastical
government was in strict accordance with the
canon law. Nothing was to be gained by legisla
tion against the measure ; and the wise conclusion
was come to that " the Pope may do just what he
likes in this matter." The result would probably
be that many of those already half-way to Rome
would pass over to that communion ; but beyond
this there was no cause for alarm. The Glasgow
Herald, in somewhat similar terms, expressed
the opinion that the erection of the hierarchy
would doubtless prove a new incentive to waver
ing Protestants, of every class, to seek admission
into the Roman Church. An article in the Pall
Mall Gazette took occasion to warn Catholics
against the delusion of regarding the Papal act
as a triumph of their Church in Scotland. The
increase of shepherds did not necessarily betoken
an increase in the flock. The chief interest at
taching to the matter, from the writer's point of
1 Sept. 22, 1877.
314 THE RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY.
view, was the striking proof that it afforded of
the progress of religious tolerance.
Passive The anticipations generally entertained, that
attitude of ipoiii 11 •
Scottish the people of Scotland would preserve an entirely
tants. passive attitude in reference to the contemplated
act of the Pope, were fully realised. The daily
press was, it is true, called upon to record the
holding of a few isolated demonstrations, which
betokened that the uncompromising spirit of
the old Covenanters was not altogether extinct.
o
These manifestations, however, could bear no
comparison with the outburst of popular fanat
icism which had been witnessed eight - and -
twenty years before, when Pius IX. was charged
with assailing the English constitution, " by
means not of an armada, but of a single sheet
of paper." At that time, as is well known, the
walls of Parliament, and of every public hall in
England, rang with the wildest denunciations
of the head of the Catholic Church, and Lord
John Russell addressed to the Bishop of Durham
the famous letter, bristling with misrepresented
and distorted facts, which long served as the
manifesto of the more violent party among
Anglican Churchmen. The Scottish Protestants
declined to follow a precedent at once so un
dignified and so useless, and the Papal act of
1878 was suffered to pass unopposed.1 Towards
1 One champion of the Free Church did, it is true, announce in the
General Assembly that he had telegraphed to the Pope to the follow-
LEGAL OPINION ON THE HIERARCHY. 315
the end of March of that year, an interesting
document was published by the Scotsman, in the Opinion of
r» • • 11111 leading
shape of a legal opinion pronounced by the lead- counsel on
* J the subject.
ing Scottish counsel, the Dean of Faculty (Mr
Eraser) and Mr Taylor Innes, on the state of the
actual law as affecting the restored hierarchy.
Both expressed their belief that the recent act
was contrary to the statute law of Scotland,
but they held, at the same time, that no pains
or penalties were incurred by the prelates adopt
ing the titles conferred on them by the Pope.
" Though we are of opinion," the document con
cludes, " that the Pope's jurisdiction is abolished
in Scotland, and that he can confer none on any
bishop in Scotland, yet no one can, by process of
interdict, declarator, or otherwise, prevent the
establishment of the proposed hierarchy, or the
assumption of titles by the Pope's bishops. All
that the law does is to refuse recognition of such
titles. A court of law would dismiss an action
brought in the name of a person calling himself
a bishop in virtue of the Pope's letters, or at all
events would order such designation to be struck
out of a summons or other legal writ/' l
On April 13, 1878, the prelates of the Scotch
ing effect : " If your projected hierarchy is proclaimed in Scotland,
proceedings will be taken against you in the Court of Session." This
piece of intelligence, however, was unfeelingly received with " loud
laughter," and nothing more was heard of the threatened litigation.
— TRANSLATOR.
1 Tablet, 1878, vol. i. p. 387.
316 THE RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY.
Protest of Episcopalian body published a formal protest
Episco- against the Pontifical bull by which the hierarchy
palians. . J
was restored in Scotland. This curious document
runs as follows : "In the name of God, Amen.
Whereas we, the undersigned bishops, occupy by
Divine permission the ancient sees of the Church
of Scotland, claiming none other authority and
jurisdiction than such as were claimed and exer
cised by the bishops of the primitive Church,
before any of the kingdoms of this world became
the kingdoms of our God and His Christ ; and
teaching the faith once delivered to the Saints
(and none other), as it is contained in Holy Scrip
ture, and defined by the (Ecumenical Synods of
the undivided Church of Christ ; and whereas
the Bishop of Rome, who neither hath nor ought
to have any authority or jurisdiction, ecclesias
tical or spiritual, in this realm, hath, on the plea of
a pretended universal supremacy over the Church
of Christ, intruded prelates of his own appoint
ment into sees occupied by us ; and whereas it is
the law of primitive episcopacy, as instituted by
the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all
bishops in the Church of Christ are of the same
order and hold the same apostolic office, and that
for any one of them to claim universal supremacy
is to usurp the office of the Lord Himself; and
whereas, also, it is according to canonical rule
and the order of the Catholic Church that there
should be but one bishop in the same see, so that
PROTEST OF THE SCOTCH EPISCOPALIANS. 317
the intrusion of a second bishop into a see al
ready occupied is a violation of the law of unity,
and a rending of the body of Christ : we, there
fore, the bishops aforesaid," &C.1
We need not dwell on the extraordinary con
fusion of ideas, both theological and historical,
which underlies this singular protest. It is diffi
cult to understand how its compilers could thus
ignore the indisputable fact that the body which
they represented, so far from having any relations
whatever with the ancient Church, owed its ex
istence to the ecclesiastical whims of the Stuart
kings, who imposed by main force on the Scottish
people a form of church government to which the
great majority was, and still is, invincibly opposed.
The primary function of the Anglican Establish
ment has been defined to be that of representing
the spiritual element amid the constantly chang
ing opinions of the day, not of administering
sacraments or deciding questions of faith ; 2 and
she has been described by the leading organ of
Church and State in England as " exactly suited
to the English people, and reflecting their peculi
arities and prejudices." 3 The same may be said
in its degree of the Episcopalian body in Scotland,
and the Duke of Argyll was probably right in
attributing most of the accessions to that com
munion which have taken place during the last
1 The Times, April 22, 1878.
2 See Kostlin, Die Schottische Kirche, p. 179.
3 Standard (cited in The Tablet, 1878, vol. ii. p. 39).
318 THE RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY.
two centuries, in some cases to the " fancy of be
longing to a more fashionable religious body, and
in many more to the associations of English
academical education." 1
Phases of Like its Anglican sister, the Established Church
Presbyter- oniii'i r> • 11 i
of Scotland has in the course 01 time passed through
many and various phases. Were the fathers of
the Scottish Reformation, John Knox or Andrew
Melville, to rise from their graves, and witness the
modern development of the doctrines which they
taught and the discipline which they upheld, they
could hardly do otherwise than disown their nine
teenth-century followers. For nigh on three cen
turies the Kirk has expended her forces in the
two battle-fields of Episcopalianism and ecclesi
astical patronage, and she requires all her re
maining strength to defend herself against the
deadly influence of the naturalism and material
ism of the present day. All through the history
of Scottish Protestantism the vexed question of
The pa- church patronage runs like a thread, bearing
question, witness to the indefinable attraction which such
disciplinary questions have ever possessed for the
mind of the Scot. Of the thousand parishes into
which Scotland was divided at the time of the
Reformation, no less than seven hundred are said
to have been bestowed on religious and ecclesi
astical corporations.2 The First Book of Discipline
1 Edinburgh Review, 1852, p. 477.
2 Cunningham, Church Hist, of Scotland (1859), vol. ii. p. 356.
PATRONAGE IN THE ESTABLISHED CHURCH. 319
asserted the right of the people, and of every
individual parish, to choose their own minister.
Parliament, however, did not recognise this claim :
on the contrary, while conceding to the Church
the right of examining and instituting its min
isters, it enacted that the patronage should re
main in the hands of those who had formerly
exercised it. The system underwent a funda
mental change through the operation of the Act
of Annexation, passed under James VI. in 1587.
This provided that all ecclesiastical rights and
property, as to which there had been as yet no
formal legislation, and which were still in the
possession of beneficiaries, either lay or clerical,
should pass to the Crown. King James, like the Patronage
old Merovingian monarchs, bestowed a large por- James vi.
tion of this Church property, including much to
which the ancient patronal rights were still an
nexed, on his principal subjects.1 In this way
a great deal of patronage came into the hands
of laymen, many of whom were opponents of
Presbyterianism, and in favour of the episcopal
" When the rage to found and endow monasteries was epidemic in
our country, many patrons bestowed their parishes upon Religious
Houses, generally upon condition that a specified number of masses
should be annually said for their souls, and the souls of their wives,
their parents, their children, and their friends. Others gave their
parishes to enrich a bishopric, which was perhaps at the time held
by a relative. To such an extent was this system carried, that at
the time of the Reformation, out of the thousand parishes of Scot
land, about seven hundred had been thus appropriated."
1 Kb'stlin, Die Schottische Kirche, p. 107.
320 THE RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY.
form of government. Thus the question of pa
tronage came to be ultimately connected with the
constant warfare between the rival systems, in
somuch that, when, the Presbyterian polity was
dominant for the time, the rights of patrons were
abolished, only to be revived in full force when
Episcopalianism again gained the upper hand.
When King- James, after his accession to the
o
English throne, had succeeded in establishing the
Episcopalian system in his native country, it was
ordered by Parliament that patrons should direct
to the bishops their presentations to vacant ben
efices.1 The plan was skilfully devised for the
strengthening of the episcopal influence, but its
success was short-lived. For hardly did Presby-
terianism feel itself secured, by the sanction of
the Westminster Confession, from the attacks of
Abolition the Crown, than it proceeded, in 1649, to abolish
. patronage altogether, as being unauthorised by
the Word of God, and a relic of times of ignorance
and superstition. Henceforth the ministers were
to be instituted by the presbyteries, on receiving
a " call " from the congregation, on whom no min
ister was to be imposed without their own consent.
Twenty years later, Charles II., declining to profit
by the lessons of past history, gave back to the
1 Cunningham, op. cit., vol. ii. p. 357. " By Acts of Assembly
and Acts of Parliament, patrons were now instructed to direct their
presentations to the bishop of the diocese where the vacant benefice
was. If the patron did not present, the bishop was empowered
to do so."
PATRONAGE IN THE ESTABLISHED CHURCH. 321
patrons their former privilege ; but no sooner was
William of Orange, with his Calvinistic sym
pathies, seated on the throne than they found
themselves compelled, in return for a small com
pensation, to hand over their newly restored
rights to the elders and heritors, or chief landed
proprietors, of the respective parishes. Under
William's sister-in-law and successor, Queen Anne,
the Whig Ministry succeeded, after violent oppo
sition, in carrying through the legislative union
of England and Scotland ; but scarcely was this
achieved than the Tories took advantage of the
queen's predilection for Episcopalianism to press
for the restoration of the old system. In 1712
their efforts were crowned with success : the
Crown, as well as all persons who had been for
merly entitled to exercise patronal rights, was
solemnly confirmed in the same, and the presby
teries were directed duly to receive the ministers
thus nominated. Such a measure as this could
not but inflict a blow on Presbyterianism from
which it could not easily recover. On the other
hand, there was now in process of formation
within the Church itself a school of thought
whose tendency was to show more and more
subservience to the influence of the State.
Under the monarchs of the house of Hanover,
we find developing slowly but steadily in the
Scotch Establishment the so-called system of the
Moderates, whose policy may be briefly described
VOL. IV. x
322 THE RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY.
as one tending to smooth down the asperities of
the ancient Kirk, and to accommodate itself to
the spirit of the age, and to the requirements of
the civil power. As far as disciplinary matters
were concerned, the effect of these opinions was of
course to strengthen the influence of the State in
ecclesiastical affairs, and to undermine the original
democratic constitution of the Kirk ; while from
a doctrinal point of view their tendency was to
wards a relaxation of the rigid theories of Calvin,
and the adoption by the clergy of the milder
Arminian system, or of undisguisedly rational
istic views. No express mention had been made,
in the Act of 1712, of the call which had hitherto
been an indispensable condition of every minis
terial appointment. It had thus by degrees fallen
into disuse, and the presentations made by the
patrons were uniformly upheld by the General
Assembly, the supreme spiritual court, often in
spite of the remonstrances of the congregations
concerned. This line of action, enhancing as it
did the influence of the civil power at the expense
of the ecclesiastical authority, was the occasion
of more than one movement of secession in the
eighteenth century, as in 1733 and 1752 ; but it
was not until a hundred years later that the con
test with regard to patronage broke out with
from t£ou fresh violence, resulting ultimately in that whole-
usted" sale exodus from the Establishment which began
i843rch' in 1843, spread rapidly over the whole country,
INFLUENCE OF THE FREE CHURCH. 323
and ended in the erection of hundreds of new par
ishes, churches, and schools throughout Scotland.
Ten years previous to this remarkable movement,
the General Assembly had attempted to modify
the call system in a manner consonant to the
requirements of the time, by passing the so-called
Veto Act, which provided that the call was to be The veto
subscribed by a majority of heads of families in A
the congregation; and if these declared them
selves against the individual presented by the
patron, the presbytery was to refuse to institute
him. The Court of Session, however, the high
est legal tribunal in Scotland, absolutely declined
to sanction this enactment, as did also the Eng
lish House of Lords, to which the General As
sembly appealed. Such was the only reward
gained from the State by Dr Robertson and his
colleagues, the leaders of the Moderate party, in
return for their well-meant efforts to harmonise
the disciplinary theories of Presbyterianism with
the laws of the country.
The result of the great secession from the strength of
Established Church, of which we have spoken, Church.
was the formation of what is now known as the
Free Church of Scotland — a body whose adher
ents are said to be yearly increasing, and whose
zeal and activity in the dissemination of religious
literature, and in the education of vouth, render
\J
it a formidable competitor with the Establishment.
Three principal denominations thus share between
324 THE RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY.
them Presbyterian Scotland : the State Church,
the United Presbyterian, and the Free. The
first may claim to be of John Knox's own foun
dation, the second dates from the middle of the
eighteenth century, and the Free Church, as we
have said, had its origin in 1843.
Religious It is impossible to peruse the accounts of the
divisions in . pi TJ?P
Scotland, proceedings of the representatives ot these dmer-
ent bodies, at their annual assemblies in Edin
burgh, without feeling that they are in truth
widely separated one from the other. A com
mittee of the General Assembly of the Established
Church was appointed in 1878, with a mandate
to ascertain what prospect there was of the pro
ject of a union between the three Churches being
realised. The United Presbyterian Synod offi
cially declared in the following year that " in
accordance with the principles and history of
their Church, it was impossible for them to con
template sharing with the Established Church
the trust reposed in it by the State."1 As to
the Free Church, nothing can be clearer than the
fact that that body has in no degree receded
from the position which it took up nearly fifty
years ago, in respect to the question of repudi
ating all kind of civil interference with religion.2
In other words, the gulf which separates these
1 Edinburgh Daily Review. Report of United Presbyterian Synod,
May 9, 1879.
'2 Ibid. Report of Free Church General Assembly, May 31, 1879.
THE ESTABLISHED CHURCH AND THE STATE. 325
three religious denominations seems to be even
more impassable in our own day than it was forty
years ago. The division between them, to use
the words of Professor Calderwood, is to all ap
pearances an evil that does not admit of remedy.
Notwithstanding the large extent to which the The Estab
lished
Presbyterian Church of Scotland has always en- Church
J and the
joyed the support of the State, two blows have state.
been inflicted upon her in recent years, which her
opponents assert to be only preparatory to com
plete disestablishment. These are the abolition
by Parliament, at the instance of Mr M'Laren, of
the annuity-tax, formerly levied from other de
nominations in favour of the State religion ; and,
secondly, the Act rendering the publication of
banns in the parish church no longer compulsory.1
A still more important crisis in the fortunes of the
Church of Scotland is at present impending, in
the shape of the bill introduced into the House
of Commons by Mr Dick Peddie, for her dis
establishment and disendowment.2
Looking back over the past history of Scottish Fiuctua-
Protestantism, the observer is struck by the Scottish
Protes-
singular and disedifying spectacle of an almost tantism.
continuous process of change in the constitution
of the Church. No less than ten times has it
been altered in the course of the last three
1 See ante, pp. 278, 279.
2 Since the above was written, the party of disestablishment has
been powerfully reinforced by the accession to their ranks of the
veteran Liberal leader, Mr Gladstone. — TRANSLATOR.
326 THE RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY.
centuries,1 and we are warned by competent
judges to look for changes still more vital in the
immediate future. " Reformation, restoration,
revolution, disruption — such are the four key
notes," remarks Dr Wordsworth, the Scottish-
Anglican Bishop of St Andrews, " which mark
the four great epochs of our Scottish Church
history downwards from the middle of the six
teenth century. And whether or no we shall
have occasion to add to them a fifth — viz., dis
establishment — will, in all probability, be seen
ere long. If the Reformation had done its work
wisely and effectually, there would have been no
need for rebellion first and restoration after
wards. ... If the Restoration had done its
work wisely and effectually, there would have
been no occasion for the Revolution afterwards.
... If the Revolution had done fully and effec
tually what it undertook to do, the fatal move-
1 In Mr Lawson's edition of Keith's Affairs of Church and State
(vol. iii. p. 88) is given the following summary of the changes
referred to :
1. The Knoxian or Superintendent system . 1560-1571.
2. The Tulchan system 1571-1590.
3. The Melvillian or Presbyterian system . 1590-1603.
4. Titular or nominal Episcopacy . . . 1603-1610.
5. Pure Episcopacy 1610-1639.
6. Presbyterianism restored .... 1639-1650.
7. Presbyterianism divided into Resolutioners
and Protesters 1650-1661.
8. Pure Episcopacy restored .... 1661-1688.
9. Presbyterianism restored .... 1688-1843.
10. Disruption, and foundation'of Free Church 1843.
SUBDIVISIONS OF PROTESTANTISM. 327
ment which ended in disruption would have been
unknown." l
A more decisive condemnation of the revolt
from the ancient Church in the sixteenth century
than these words convey can with difficulty be
imagined. A leading Anglican dignitary has not
hesitated to characterise as " seceders " the ad
herents of the Episcopalian body in Scotland ; 2
but if the theory of Bishop Wordsworth be cor
rect, the term may be applied with at least equal
justice to all those who abandoned the religion
of their fathers.
Besides the three leading denominations of Subdivi
sions of
which we have spoken, the comprehensive Pro- Protestant
sects.
testantism of Scotland includes numerous smaller
sects. One list, which does not pretend to be
exhaustive, enumerates these lesser religious
bodies as follows : Irvingites, Rowites, Volun
taries, Vetoists, Strathbogites, Free Kirk Ad
herents, Drummondites, English Episcopalians,
Scotch Episcopalians, Congregationalists, Re
formed Presbyterians, Evangelical Unionists,
United Original Seceders, simple Presbyterians,
Adherents of the Gospel Church, Catholic Apos-
tolics, the Church of John Knox, the Church
of the New Jerusalem, Old Scottish Independents,
Chartists, Socialists, Secularists, Waddelites,
Knightites, &c., &c.8
1 Wordsworth, Discourse on Scottish Church History, pp. 43, 44.
2 Stanley, Lectures on the Church of Scotland, pp. 149, 169, 172.
3 Walsh, Hist, of the Cath. Church in Scotland, p. 562.
328 THE RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY.
Each of these sects maintains certain theological
views of its own, more or less sharply denned, and
more or less distinct from those of the rest. It
must be remembered that the whole dogmatic
Modifica- system of Presbyterianism has undergone funda-
tionofthe J , . . .
original mental changes since its original evolution three
Calvinism.
centuries ago. Calvinism, properly so called, can
no longer pretend to have that hold on the Scot
tish mind which was formerly claimed for it.1 For
more than two hundred years the gloomy doctrines
of Geneva reigned supreme in Scotland : they
were laid down in the oldest authoritative for
mulas of the Church, and received the solemn
sanction of the Westminster Conference. But in
the middle of the last century the influence of the
Moderatist party helped to bring about that reac
tion which tended to favour the Arminian teach
ing, and to acknowledge at least some degree of
freedom in the will of man. It is hardly with
justice that this system has been charged with
being unphilosophic : on the contrary, it was in
the system of Calvin that the utter misconception
of the nature of the human soul, and the anti-
philosophic spirit which characterised the pioneers
of Protestantism, reached their highest develop
ment. Philosophic speculation can never be en
tirely suppressed ; but unless it be directed by the
1 Cf. Cunningham, Church Hist., vol. ii. p. 140. "But besides
this, Calvinism is native to the Scottish mind. The land which has
produced so many metaphysicians could scarcely content itself with
the plausible but unphilosophic system of Arminius."
SPREAD OF RATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND. 329
light of faith, it will surely be led astray by the
ignis fatuus of human error. Under the influence
of the English and Scottish philosophy, the em
piricism of Locke, the deism of Tindal, and the
scepticism of Hume, the supremacy of the once
dominant theology of Calvin was for ever de
stroyed, and the door was opened wide to the
new rationalistic spirit of the day. The reaction Else of the
rationalis-
due to the school of thought inaugurated by Reid tic spirit.
and his followers had no lasting fruits.1 In proof
of the extent to which the Presbyterian Churches
have been penetrated by rationalistic views, we
may refer to the recent cases of Professor Smith Scottish
heresy
of Aberdeen, arid the United Presbyterian min- cases.
ister, Mr Ferguson. The former (after being
acquitted by his own presbytery) was convicted,
before the highest spiritual tribunal, of having
contested the authenticity of the Pentateuch, and
propounded erroneous views as to the inspiration
of the sacred books. Mr Ferguson, a minister of
Glasgow, was accused of having written in a sense
opposed to the Westminster Confession, of having
modified the orthodox doctrine of predestination,
and of having expounded the Christian mysteries
in language borrowed from modern philosophy.
Suspended by his presbytery, he was rehabili
tated by the Synod, but under the obligation
of demonstrating the agreement of his sermons
and writings with the Confession, and of refrain
1 See Stock], Geschichte der Philosophic, pp. 618-648.
330 THE RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY.
ing for the future from his unconventional modes
of expression. The narrow majority, in the first
of these cases, of twenty votes out of six hundred,
together with the fact that the most learned men
in the country espoused the cause of the con
demned professor, and appealed on his behalf to
the scientific results of Continental exegesis, suf
ficiently testify to the spirit prevalent in the
Churches. Smith, who took his stand entirely on
the most advanced German Biblical criticism of
the day, was relieved of his professorship two
years later.
Proposed Among the theological questions which have
revision of . if i • i c^i • i T->
the Pres- come prominently forward in the bcottish Jrrotes-
hyteriau
formu- tant Churches in recent years, have been the
laries.
proposed revision of the formularies, and the
denial of the doctrine of eternal punishment. " Is
the Anglican Church worth preserving ? " is the
inquiry which Mr Gladstone has lately deemed it
opportune to address to his fellow-churchmen in
England ; and in the bosom of the Presbyterian
Church of Scotland has simultaneously been raised
the not less momentous question, " Is the West
minster Confession of Faith worth revising ? " l
Mr Macrae, a minister of the United Presbyterian
body, has openly asserted that in its teaching as to
predestination, the impossibility of man once justi
fied losing divine grace, and the eternal condemna-
1 Is the Westminster Confession of Faith worth revising ? By Phila-
lethes (Glasgow, 1877).
ATTACK ON DOGMAS OF RELIGION. 331
tion of those outside the Church,1 the Confession
is in direct opposition to Holy Writ. He charged
his brethren in the ministry with not believing
the doctrines to whose truth they had solemnly
subscribed, and he quoted in illustration these
words of the Confession : "It is very pernicious,
and to be detested, to assert that men not pro
fessing the Christian religion can be saved in any
other way whatsoever, be they ever so diligent to
frame their lives according to the light of nature
and the law of that religion they do profess." ' "I
call on the fathers and brethren of this presby
tery," exclaimed Mr Macrae in holy zeal, " to
acknowledge honestly if that is the theology
which they profess to hold." In truth, if, as is
universally allowed, the belief of Presbyterians of
to-day does differ in important points from the
teaching of the Confession of Westminster, the
demand that this discrepancy should be publicly
recognised seems no more than reasonable. And
the General Assembly virtually admitted this, by
issuing in 1879 a so-called Declaratory Statement,
by which the rigid Calvinistic doctrine of predesti
nation was materially modified.
Not only the doctrine just referred to, but also Attacks OH
•* the dogma
that which teaches the eternity of the punishment of eternal
•f punish -
of hell, has been strenuously attacked, both in ment-
1 " The heathen in mass . . . are evidently strangers to God and
going down to death."
2 Westminster Confession (ed. 1877), ch. x. sect. 4.
332 THE RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY.
England and Scotland, in our own days.1 In this
connection also Mr Macrae has come forward as
the representative of popular rationalism against
the teaching of the Bible ; and not content with
explaining away the words of Scripture, has
specially emphasised the extraordinary discrep
ancies which he professes to have discovered be
tween the teaching of the Westminster Confession
and of Holy Writ. Nor is such a contradiction
by any means so improbable as it might at first
sight appear. For can there, in truth, be any
room for a belief in the eternity of punishment in
the genuine system of Calvin ? Does not that
system, in its teaching on predestination, do away
with the freedom, and consequently with the re
sponsibility of the human will ? " No responsi
bility," it has been justly argued,2 " requires the
denial of guilt ; and the denial of guilt is equiva
lent to the denial of sin. If no responsibility nor
sin, then there can be no punishment, for punish
ment is the wages of sin. If no punishment for
sin, then there is no hell. If there be no sin nor
hell, then there is no Saviour ; for the object of a
Saviour is to deliver men from sin and hell." In
1882, the General Assembly of the Free Church
sat in judgment on a work by Professor Bruce,
entitled ' The Chief End of Revelation/ which
1 See, on this question, an excellent article in the Dublin Review,
Jan. 1881, pp. 116-145.
2 Munro, Calvinism in its relations to Scripture and Reason (1856),
p. 192.
DECAY OF THE INFLUENCE OF RELIGION. 333
was alleged to attack the authority of Holy
Scripture ; but they were unable to come to any
practical conclusion regarding it.1
That under such circumstances as these religion Decay of
religion in
must inevitably lose all influence on the masses, Scotland.
is evident at the first glance. At a meeting, some
ten years ago, of the Free Presbytery of Edin
burgh, Mr Gall referred to a recent report received
on the state of the lower classes, from which it
appeared that " evangelical religion was losing
ground in the city, and the agencies at present
in operation were altogether inadequate to the
necessities of the case : for every step they had
taken, the enemy had taken two, so that if the
same process should continue to go on, nothing
could be more certain than that, in two or three
generations, Protestant Christianity would be
substantially put down." : The Scotsman wrote in
similar terms. " That the old Protestant Churches
are losing their hold upon great masses of the
population is a complaint that comes from all
quarters of Christendom. From Germany comes
a wail of despair, from England a cry of alarm,
and now the coronach is raised in the metropolis
of ' Bible-loving ' Scotland itself." The language
1 Glasgow Herald, May 26, 1882.
2 Marshall, Protestant Journalism, p. 28. This powerful writer,
a convert to Catholicism, whose acquaintance with the religious
views of his countrymen, and power of analysing their expression
in the contemporary press, were alike remarkable, died in Decem
ber 1877.
334 THE RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY.
of Mr Gall sufficiently indicates in what direction
he detected signs of real progress. "The most
alarming circumstance of all," he declared, " was
the steady progress of Romanism, which, during
the past fifty years, from being almost nothing,
had succeeded in planting itself as a great religious
and political power in our land. . . . Drunken
ness, infidelity, and Sabbath-breaking were all on
the increase, but perhaps none of these was to be
so much dreaded as Romanism." l Expressions
such as these cannot but recall to our minds the
pithy comment made by Hugh Miller on Lord
George Gordon and his vandal mob : " Good
Protestants, but bad Christians."
Position In singular contrast with the eccentricities and
arid pros- _ . , , , . .
pect.s errors 01 these humanly invented religious sys-
cathoiic terns, the ancient Apostolic Church stands forth
Church
iUiuicot once more in all the majesty and beauty of her
restored organisation. The act by which Leo
XIII. revived the normal government of the Scot
tish Church was a link which reunited her with
the pre-Reformation period of her history. The
influence which her episcopate wielded for up
wards of a thousand years, and which three cen
turies ago was shattered, as it seemed for ever, by
the machinations of the evil one, is once more in
active and fruitful operation. What the ancient
Church of Scotland believed, practised, and taught,
that is believed, practised, and taught by Scottish
1 Marshall, Protestant Journalism, p. 29.
PROSPECTS OF THE CHURCH IN SCOTLAND. 335
Catholics to-day. Let there but be granted to
the Church that liberty of action, that air and
light which are the indispensable conditions of
her being, and she cannot fail to deliver the
people of Scotland anew from the bonds of error,
of unbelief, and of intemperance, in which they
have so long been held. Let clergy and people
but preserve their union unbroken, and Scotland
may yet look forward with confidence to the same
splendid results which, alike in England, Holland,
America, and Australia, have followed the resto
ration of the hierarchy, and which form some of
the brightest pages in the religious history of our
times.
The Scottish Church is, it is true, but poorly Material
, -, -r-jT- •• condition
provided with this world s goods. We have seen of the
Church.
how, three hundred years ago, her extensive pos
sessions fell a prey to the nobles and the preachers
of the new gospel. But although the spoliated
property of the Church and the poor has brought,
as history abundantly testifies,1 little profit — nay,
rather, disaster and calamity — to its new posses
sors, yet the Church herself has been thus freed
from a burden which had grown in the course of
centuries to be a serious hindrance to the fruitful-
ness of her labours. Catholicism in Scotland has
to-day little to fear in this respect. At the same
time, in direct proportion to the vigorous growth
1 For detailed evidence of this, see Sir Henry Spelman's History
and Fate of Sacrilege, edited by two Anglican clergymen (1846).
336 THE RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY.
of her spiritual life is the certainty that material
support will not be wanting to her. The recent
history of the Scottish Church affords no more
striking illustration of this truth than in the
The Abbey foundation of the great Benedictine Abbey of
Augustus. Fort-Augustus, on the shores of Loch Ness, in
Inverness -shire. Called into existence through
the munificence of Lord Lovat and other benefac
tors not less generous, this remarkable institu
tion, which challenges comparison with the finest
monasteries of medieval times, is at once a centre
of religious life and a seat of education and in
struction of youth. By a brief, dated December
12, 1882, it was raised by Leo XIII. to the rank
of an abbey, immediately subject to the Holy See.1
Seculars Among the latest proofs given by Leo XIII. of
lars. 6The his solicitude for the welfare of the Scottish
manos Church was the publication, on May 7, 1881, of
the important bull Romanes Pontifices. The
regulations issued by Benedict XIV. for the Eng
lish mission had long ceased to suffice for the
requirements of modern times. There can be no
room for doubt that the flourishing condition to
which the Church in Great Britain has attained
since 1829 is very largely due to the indefatigable
1 The abbey of Fort- Augustus was selected in 1886 as the most
fitting spot for the assembly of the first national council of the
restored hierarchy. In 1888 the first abbot (the Right Rev. Leo
Linse) received the solemn benediction at the hands of Archbishop
Persico, in presence of a large assembly of prelates, clergy, and
laity. — TRANSLATOR.
THE BULL ROMANOS PONTIFICES. 337
labours of the religious orders ; nor would it be
rash to assert that without the support of those
bodies the bishops would have found it impos
sible to satisfy the spiritual wants of the faithful.
The prominent part thus taken in the labours of
the mission by these orders rendered it inevitable
that a number of circumstances should arise, in
which the interests of secular and regular clergy
would be more or less in conflict. The rights of
both parties were defined by the Pope in the bull
already mentioned, of whose principal provisions
the following is a summary.1
1. Regulars residing on the mission enjoy the
same privileges of exemption as those living within
the monastery, except in certain cases expressly
provided for, and, generally speaking, in everything
concerning the cure of souls and the administra
tion of the sacraments. 2. Members of religious
orders, if missionary rectors or curates, are bound
to attend the conferences of the clergy. 3. They
are also required to assist at the diocesan synods.
4. They have the right of appealing, under cer
tain restrictions,2 against the episcopal interpreta
tion of synodal decrees. 5. In the subdivision of
1 Sanctissimi D. N. Leonis XIII. Constitutio, qua nonnulla contro-
versiarum capita inter episcopos et missionaries regulares Anglic et
Scotia; definiuntur. The text of the bull was printed in Der Kath-
olik, 1881, vol. i. p. 618-638.
2 When the question is one which touches the common law of the
Church, the appeal is said to be in devolutivo — i.e., the law con
tinues to bind until otherwise decided by the Holy See : in the case
of new and special laws (affecting regulars), the appeal is in suspen-
VOL. IV. Y
338 THE RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY.
canonically erected parishes, the bishop is bound
to observe the formalities required by the Council
of Trent ; l in the case of ordinary missions he
may proceed to act after taking the advice of his
chapter.2 The opinion of the rector of the mission
should first be taken in the matter. 6. The bishop
is under no circumstances obliged to appoint a
regular to the charge of the newly elected mis
sion. 7. The bishop has the right of supervision
and visitation of the primary schools in missions
served by regulars ; but the privileges of the
latter in respect to schools and colleges for higher
education are and remain intact. 8. No new
religious foundations can be made without the
consent of the Bishop and of the Holy See. 9. The
same sanction is required in order to change the
scope of any existing religious institute, unless
such change is provided for in the original foun
dation, and regards merely the internal govern
ment and discipline. 10. Regulars, who have
the cure of souls, are bound to render an annual
account to the bishop of so much of the offerings
of the faithful as are bestowed on the mission as
such, and not on themselves personally. As to
what comes under the denomination of mission
funds, this point is to be decided on the principles
sivo — {fgf) the operation of the law is suspended until Rome has
spoken. — TRANSLATOR.
1 Cap. iv. sess. 21. De reformatione. — TRANSLATOR.
2 According to the provisions of the first Council of "Westminster
(De regimine congregationum sen missionum, No. 5). — TRANSLATOR.
SCOTLAND AND THE HOLY SEE. 339
laid down by the second Provincial Council of
Westminster.1
Our survey of the Christian centuries is ended. Scotland
and the
Saint Ninian, trained in Rome for his great mis- Holy see.
sion, was the first messenger of the faith to Scot
land ; and from the days of Ninian onward the
union of the Scottish Church with the Holy See
remained unbroken. During the monastic period
of her history2 the influence of Rome may, in
deed, seem to have been for a time obscured.
But that period was, as we have seen, an extra
ordinary episode in the life of the Church, due to
the peculiar circumstances of time and place in
which it took its rise ; and, the rude northern
peoples once converted through its means, it was
destined speedily to give place to the normal form
of ecclesiastical government. From the time of
the establishment of the diocesan system in the
eleventh century, through the labours of Saint
Margaret and her consort, Malcolm Canmore, few
countries of Europe maintained so intimate a rela
tion with Rome as Catholic Scotland. The per-
1 Cap. De bonis ecclesiasticis. See Collectio Condi. Lacens., vol. iii.
p. 981.
2 A poet of our own times has thus depicted monastic England: —
" Who with the ploughshare clove the barren moors,
And to green meadows changed the swampy shores ?
Thinned the rank woods, and for the cheerful grange
Made room where wolf and bear were used to range ?
Who thought, and showed by deeds, that gentler chains
Should bind the vassal to his lord's domains ?
The thoughtful monks, intent their God to please,
For Christ's dear sake, with human sympathies."
340 THE RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY.
secuting laws enacted by the self-constituted Par
liament of August 1560 did, indeed, succeed in
weakening that relation ; but the course of our
narrative has sufficiently demonstrated that it was
never altogether destroyed. Even in our own
day, the impress of Catholicism is still stamped
upon the face of Scotland. Louder than human
tongue can speak, the voiceless ruins of her noble
cathedral and monastic churches still bear their
witness to the ancient faith.1 We have seen how,
with the first signs of relaxation of the crushing
penal statutes, the Scottish Catholics re-entered
on the public life of the nation, and at the same
time strengthened their connection with the centre
of Christian unity. The Popes, on their side, never
1 " Ye holy walls, that, still sublime,
Resist the crumbling touch of Time,
How strongly still your form displays
The piety of ancient days !
As through your ruins hoar and grey,
Ruins yet beauteous in decay,
The silvery moonbeams trembling fly ;
The forms of ages long gone by
Crowd thick on Fancy's wondering eye
And wake the soul to musings high.
E'en now, as lost in thought profound,
I view the solemn scene around,
And pensive gaze with wistful eyes,
The past returns, the present flies ;
Again the dome in pristine pride
Lifts high its roof and arches wide,
That, knit with curious tracery,
Each Gothic ornament display :
The high-arched windows, painted fair,
Show many a saint and martyr there." — BURNS.
PRESENT POSITION OF CATHOLICS. 341
relaxed in their interest and care for their Scot
tish children. They accorded to them material
support when it was most needed, and provided
for their spiritual wants, first by the appointment
of vicars-apostolic, and finally by the restoration
of the hierarchy. And to-day there is no body Position of
of men which stands higher in the public esteem lie clergy
at the pres-
than the Catholic clergy of Scotland. The old entday.
fanatical fervour is strangely cooled ; and the
attitude of the modern Scotsman towards his
Catholic countrymen is in happy contrast with
the blind irrational zeal of his fathers, which
hunted down priests and bishops like wild beasts,
or slowly crushed them beneath the grinding pres
sure of merciless laws. " No clergyman in Glas
gow," wrote the leading journal of that city, in
February 1883, "is more respected, and, we may
add, loved by all who know him, than Archbishop
Eyre. The first bearer of the restored title of
' Archbishop of Glasgow/ he has never obtruded
that title in a society in which he knows it awak
ens very checkered memories, and is regarded as a
somewhat illegitimate assumption. He has filled
his place with courtesy to all ; has done his duty
in every public movement he could assist ; has
ruled his clergy faithfully, and laboured assidu
ously for the temporal and spiritual good of his
co-religionists. . . . Throughout Scotland gener
ally, the Romish clergy do their duty with devo
tion. They minister to their generally poor, and
342 THE RESTORATION OF THE HIERARCHY.
often degraded, flocks with faithful zeal. . . . We
have no love of their creed and their systems ; but
we ought to be therefore all the more ready to do
justice to good qualities, which ought to be recog
nised by all."1
May the rich blessings which, since the restora
tion of the hierarchy in England on September
29, 1850, have been poured out on that country,
be imparted in the future still more abundantly
to Catholic Scotland !
LAUS DEO TKIUNI.
I Glasgow Herald, (Quoted in The Tablet, February 24, 1883.)
APPENDIX,
I. (p. 39).
LETTER FROM POPE URBAN VIII. TO RICHARD SMITH, BISHOP
OF CHALCEDON, VICAR - APOSTOLIC FOR ENGLAND AND
SCOTLAND. ROME, 1626.
(Cod. Awjcl, B. 2. 5, p. 206. Urlani Till. Epistolcc et Brevia.)
Episcopo Calcedonensi.
Patefiunt isthic catharactse coeli et manna coelestium con-
solationum depluit in terras scatentes venenatis hsereticorum
dogmatum torrentibus. Orthodoxam fidem, quam carceris
squallore mcerentem, et catenarum ignominias deforniatam
ante acta setas qurerebat in latibulis, videtis nunc in Britan-
narum reginarurn solio coronatam diademate honoris. Jactate
cogitationes vestras in domino, in cujus manu sunt corda
dominantium, et ipse ex zizaniorum senticetis seliget vobis
messem benedictionis, et pane Angelorum instruct mensas
illas, ubi fel Draconum crudelis hseresis propinat. Nos
quidem ex literis fraternitatis tuse non leve cepimus solatium,
tarn pium Anglicanse Reginae ingenium debellare in Britan-
nicis Insulis, potenter dimicante Domino, potentias Diaboli et
Regii Conjugis cor captivare in obsequium filiorum Dei. Ut
tarn beatam spem optatos ad exitus Spiritus Sanctus perducat,
accuratissimis precibus flagitabunt quotidie Pontificia sol-
344 APPENDIX.
licitudo et Catholica Ecclesia. Vos interea armamini jejuniis,
pugnate orationibus cseterisque pietatis artibus, inferte vim
regno coelorum, atque inde auxiliarias Angelorum Legiones
elicite pro Eegina, et Eeligione in iis Eegnis militaturas.
Pontificium patrocinium numquam deerit t'raternitati tuse,
ceeterisque filiis nostris Catholicis, quos in sinu gerimus
Apostolicse charitatis, et triumphare cupimus in consiliis
justorum. Te vero censemus dignum omni laude, cujus infuke
in ista Ecclesia existimantur esse Arces pietatis et consilia
salutis. Cum autem se coelo isthic sustinendo imparem se
fateatur modestia fraternitatis tuse, conabimur tibi ilium con-
ciliare, sub quo curvantur, qui portant orbem.
Non leve autem auxilium acljungere poterit piis diligentiis
Prsesulis . . . Mimatentis Episcopi Patris Berulli virtus.
Consociate consilia, dimicate fcederatis ingeniis, o anima3
coronatse scuto bonse voluntatis, quos [non] in deliciis cellarum
conquiescere, sed in periculis castrorum merere voluit Im-
perator seternus. Speramus vestra diligentia et authoritate
optima Eegime irritos isthic fore conatus Inferni, nee defu-
turos Eeligioni suos triumphos, ac fraternitati tute Apostoli-
cam benedictionem peramanter impertimur.
Datum, &c.
II. (p. 46).
EEPORT OF THE SUPERIOR OF THE SCOTTISH MISSION TO THE
CONGREGATION OF PROPAGANDA, 1650-1660.1
(Cod. Barberin., xxx. 132, p. 127.)
MOST EMINENT AND MOST EEVEREND LORDS,
Since the time when your Eminences, to whom is committed
that most divine of all offices, the care of the propagation of
the faith, deigned to extend the compassion of your fatherly
charity towards the people of Scotland, miserably ensnared in
the toils of heresy, it has been a cause of wonder even in the
1 Translated from the Latin original.
REPORT OF SUPERIOR OF SCOTTISH MISSION. 345
eyes of our enemies to see what progress the Catholic religion
has made, and how much God has blessed our labours. For —
to pass over in silence what we have touched on in previous
letters, regarding the conversion of many illustrious families
and others — such a leaning towards the Catholic faith has
become apparent in all serious men, that the pseudo-ministers
have resolved to check this progress by every possible means.
And this they have tried to do by stirring up persecution, in
order that converts to the faith might be punished and others
well disposed might be deterred, and also by lies, calumnies,
travesties of the Catholic religion, and the outpouring of a
thousand blasphemies against the Apostolic See and the
Supreme Pontiffs, with what effect I shall shortly proceed
to show.
The decree which was last year extorted from the Protector
Cromwell, by the importunity and calumnies of the ministers,
against priests and Catholics, remained unenforced for six
months, for all the authorities were reluctant to carry it out,
until at the beginning of Lent certain Anabaptist magistrates
consented to do so, after much pressure from the ministers.
Accordingly, dividing their forces, they searched simultane
ously various houses of nobles and citizens, chiefly in the city
and county of Aberdeen, hoping by this method to apprehend
all the priests living in that district at one and the same time.
But matters turned out as they wished only in the castle and
estate of Strathbogie, where they discovered two priests and
myself, and carried us prisoners to the neighbouring military
station at Fremdraught. The commander of the horse had
all the names of the priests written in a little book, and
ingenuously admitted to me that I had been described to
him so exactly as to stature, complexion, features, and other
distinctive marks, that he could have drawn a complete
portrait of me before he saw me. I remained with them
only for a short time; for with the help of certain noble
ladies, and especially through the efforts, and the security,
of the Viscount of Fremdraught, who is very influential with
346 APPENDIX.
these English, and who had been the means of my coming
to those parts, I was set at liberty. The other two were sent
to Edinburgh, where they were kept in prison for some six
months ; but as nothing could be legally proved against them,
although a number of witnesses, by the instigation of the
ministers, were brought and urged with threats to give testi
mony, they were at length released from custody, on con
dition, however, that they should not pass a night out of
Edinburgh. The ministers were almost mad with rage, and
offered themselves to testify on oath that the accused were
really priests ; but their demand was rejected, and leave was
subsequently granted to the priests even to return to their
own districts, provided that they would appear within two
months before the court at Aberdeen, so that if nothing
further were proved against them, they might be fully and
legally acquitted.
As to the other main support of heresy, namely lies and
abuse, it is marvellous how much delight the pseudo-ministers
take in these, insomuch that they seem to have lost, or never
to have possessed, any conscience as regards falsehood and
calumny, or any shame or sense of confusion when they are
openly detected in them. Besides their habitually slanderous
attacks on the Catholic religion . . . they have begun to
vomit forth such furious blasphemies against the Apostolic
See and the Supreme Pontiff, that even a passing mention of
them would be an offence to pious ears.
But not content with speech alone, they have of late been
girding themselves up to write books, not for the building up
of their own religion, but for the pulling down of ours. Thus
there has this year appeared at Aberdeen an extremely per
nicious volume, written by a minister who styles himself
doctor of divinity, and who undertakes to show, not by mere
arguments, but, as he says, by open proofs, and the testimony
of Catholics themselves, that the Apostolic See is Babylon,
and all the Supreme Pontiffs, from Boniface III. downwards,
Antichrists ; and with this object he has brought together all
REPORT OF SUPERIOR OF SCOTTISH MISSION. 347
the vile passages he could find in writers like Aventinus,
Benno, Parisius, and others, and has, moreover, miserably
garbled and corrupted a number of citations from the writ
ings of Popes and various authentic histories. In the begin
ning of his epistle dedicatory, he owns, in the following
words, that the occasion of his writing this book was the
great increase of Catholics in Scotland : " At the time of so
great a defection from the truth to Popery in this realm of
Scotland, especially in the northern parts, if it ever was
necessary for the servants of God to sound the trumpet (as
Ezekiel saith), it is so now." He adds, moreover, that this is
the real and vital question at issue, so that if what he has in
hand is once clearly proved, Popery will perish and all will
have to flee out of Babel. This book is published in the
vulgar tongue, and is the more dangerous as it is more widely
circulated, more self-asserting, and more detailed than those
historical works which are not accessible to every one. Con
sequently, at the request of the prefect of the mission and of
many Catholics, the burden of replying to it has been laid
upon me. I have completed a large part of the answer in
Scotland, and now by the grace of God I hope to finish it
here with greater ease.
There is another minister in Mar, a man of great reputa
tion among them, who has sent some tracts against the Real
Presence in the Eucharist to the Earl of Aboyne, brother of
the lately deceased Marquis of Huntly, a youth of very keen
intellect and great zeal for the Catholic faith (which he has
lately embraced), and has challenged all the priests to reply
to him. He hoped by means of this publication to draw
away the Earl and many others from the faith. At the
request of the Earl and our superior, I have carefully examined
the writings of the minister, which I have by me here, and
have not only confuted his obscure arguments and sophisms,
but have also demonstrated the truth of the Catholic doctrine
from Holy Scripture, the acts of the Supreme Pontiffs, and
reason, and have endeavoured to set it forth with all possible
348 APPENDIX.
clearness. This reply of mine, which was approved by the
prefect of the mission and other ecclesiastics, and was trans
mitted to the minister by the Earl six months ago, remains
up to now unanswered ; and perhaps it will be shortly printed
here, as is the wish of many.
The fear of forthcoming persecution has compelled many
well-disposed persons to defer their conversion, among others
a certain noble Earl in Angus, of whom I have more than
once spoken ; but my colleague, who is well known to him,
will, I hope, soon complete this work. By the grace of God,
however, three illustrious barons have recently been secretly
received into the Church. One of these is the foremost baron
of all Scotland, and head of a distinguished family. He made
a serious examination (in which I assisted him not a little)
of all the heretical dogmas, testing them by Holy Scripture
and the traditions of the fathers ; and being thoroughly con
vinced of the truth of the Catholic faith, he this year sub
mitted himself, together with his two daughters, to the sweet
yoke of Christ and of the Catholic Church, to the great joy
of the Baroness his wife, and his other children and friends,
almost all of whom have been converted within the past five
years. Among the converts are others belonging to the lesser
nobility, whose names, owing to the commencement of the
persecution, I am bound to withhold.
Among the people the number of conversions has been so
great, especially in Strathavon, the district nearest to the
Highlands, and in Strathbogie, that in the former place more
persons, and these of better condition, assist at the vener
able Catholic mysteries than at the profane worship of the
heretics ; and the minister of Strathbogie recently announced
in his sermon that if the church of the Lady Marchioness
increased as much in the next three months as it had done
in the last, he would give up preaching there altogether.
An affair has lately occurred, which has been of no little
service to the Catholic cause in these parts. There is a
woman, the wife of a farmer named Henry Sharp, living
REPORT OF SUPERIOR OF SCOTTISH MISSION. 349
in the outskirts of Strathbogie, who for a space of eight
years has been greatly perturbed in spirit, and seemed to be
under a sort of spell, for all her cattle suddenly perished. She
has been in the habit of constantly chanting, at the instiga
tion of the devil, a most lugubrious ditty, accompanied with
a trembling of her whole body ; and the meaning of this
chant she thought, in her despair, to be that she would
certainly be damned. After travelling through various parts
of the country with her husband, at great expense, and
receiving no help or comfort from the ministers or any one
else, she at length arrived at the ark of Strathbogie, and
was brought to me. After careful examination and consul
tation with other priests, and when by the prayers of the
faithful, the offering of the sacrifice of the Mass, and other
pious exercises, she had been restored to peace of mind, in
structed in the faith, and absolved after due confession of
her sins, I sent her back within fourteen days to her house,
which shortly afterwards I visited and blessed. She is now
in such a tranquil condition that she diligently attends to
her household business ; and Mr Lumsden, one of our mis
sionaries, lately admitted her, in a large assembly of the
faithful, to receive Holy Communion. The confusion that
this has caused to the ministers, and the consequent exalta
tion of the Catholic Church, may be easily imagined.
In truth, so far are the ministers from commanding the
devil, that he on the contrary occasionally exercises dominion
over some of them. A memorable example of this has lately
occurred. A certain evil spirit so disturbed the house of the
minister of Dalmaig, in the Barony of Drum, some seven
miles from Aberdeen, that what with throwing stones, coals,
and similar things, he frequently compelled the minister, his
wife, children, and servants to fly from the house. When
this became known, and when the whole tribe of ministers
could do nothing in the matter, the minister in question was
so affected by grief and shame that he soon afterwards died,
whereupon the house was immediately delivered from all
350 APPENDIX.
further annoyance. A noteworthy incident in the affair
was this, that some Catholics, recent converts, belonging to
a very illustrious family of Drum, being about to visit the
minister, took with them secretly some holy water, and re
turned untouched and uninjured ; whereas some heretics who
were in their company were struck with coals and forced to
fly. All this was well known, and matter of common talk in
the part of the country where I was then staying.
In the district of Galloway, however, a much more famous
spirit has lately appeared, and still continues to do so.
Although at first invisible, it began to talk in a summer-house
which a countryman had built in his garden, and caused great
excitement and terror among the neighbours. The ministers
were called in from all quarters in order to drive it out of the
house, but their efforts were fruitless. At length they set
the house on fire, whereupon the spirit, as he had already
threatened to do, took possession of the countryman's dwell
ing-house, and caused a greater disturbance than ever. The
most wonderful things are told about him by trustworthy
persons, both Catholics and heretics — how he argues with
the ministers who are always quoting Holy Scripture at him,
out of the same Scripture, and catches them with witty say
ings, so that no one can hear it without laughing. At length,
on being asked by one of the ministers whether he was a
demon, or the spirit of some man, he replied by holding out
an arm and hand of enormous size, which he asked him to
shake, and then proceeded to prove by argument that he had
full dominion over the minister. The result of all this has
been the confusion of the heretics, and the conviction of the
atheists, of whom there are now not a few. For many of
them were before wont to say openly that demons were mere
figments, invented to frighten children : but now they begin
to think otherwise.
The Catholic religion has likewise penetrated into the
heretical seats of education. For a certain professor of phil
osophy, named Strachan, has been this year publicly setting
REPORT OF SUPERIOR OF SCOTTISH MISSION. 351
forth in the University of Aberdeen the doctrine of the free
dom of man's will, as taught by Catholics, and other Catholic
dogmas. Words cannot express how the ministers have been
stung by this, insomuch that they have determined at any
cost to get him removed from his office and from the college.
This he cares little for, as he has already firmly resolved to
abandon heresy and join the Catholic Church, which, as is
well known, two more of the most distinguished professors in
the same university have not long ago actually done.
From these incidents — I pass over many others — your
Eminences may have some idea how marvellously, and be
yond all expectation, the Catholic religion has advanced in
Scotland within the past six years, and what hope there
would be of a greater increase daily, if so many were not
held back by fear of persecution. For of all men the
ministers have come to be the most universally hated and
detested ; their fallacies and frauds are exposed every day,
and their folly is becoming known to every man of sense.
The bitter fruits of the Covenant, which was formerly extolled
by the ministers up to heaven, are now apparent, to the dis
gust of all. For a nation which once imposed a limit to the
Eoman empire, and preserved herself ever unconquered and
secure from foreign arms, now, betrayed by the perfidy of the
ministers, and infected by the enormous sin of heresy, ex
periences by the just judgment of God the hardships of
servitude ; and this affliction gives understanding to many,
and brings them at length to a sound mind.
It has lately been reported to us that the Protector Crom
well has published, and ordered to be strictly carried out, a
new decree against Catholics and priests in Scotland and
England, according to which an oath of abjuration, as they
call it, is to be proposed to every one suspected of Catholicism.
Whoever refuses to take it will be held a Catholic, and de
prived of two-thirds of his annual income : and in this way
all those who are secretly Catholics will be compelled to
declare themselves.
352 APPENDIX.
III. (p. 91).
DISCUSSION AS TO CANONICAL PENALTIES INCURRED BY CATH
ERINE OF BRAGANZA, IN CONSEQUENCE OF HER MARRIAGE
TO CHARLES II. WITHOUT A PAPAL DISPENSATION.
(Cod. Ottob., 2462, fol. 392.)
An exigi debeat a Eegina Anglite, ut petat remissionem
poenarum canonicarum incursarum ob contractum Matri-
monium cum Eege hreretico absque dispensatione Pontificia,
et ut permittatur sibi permanere in cohabitatione matrimoniali
cum Eege Marito.
Videtur non debere exigi, 1. qnia ilia contraxit optima fide
persuasa a viris doctis sibi id licere juxta sententiam valde
communem, quam secluso perversionis periculo, in locis ubi
impune grassatur Hseresis, et ubi non est consuetudo pe-
tendi dispensationem Pontificiam, sustinent quamplurimi
doctores. . . .
2. Etiamsi peccasset contrahendo (quod tamen facile credi
non debet), tamen cum hoc peccatum nullibi sit reservatum
Papae. . . .
4. Quia nullse sunt pcense spirituales excommunicationis,
vel similes statutes in jure, quarum remissionem ipsa petere
debeat, etiamsi peccasset. . . .
5. Hoec afflictio amigeret supra omnem modum Serenis-
simam Eeginam, quse cum sit piissima, et tenerrimte con-
scientiae, et zelantissima pro fide Catbolica, inconsolabiliter
inde contristaretur, et cum passim dicatur esse gravida, timeri
posset inde sinister aliquis eventus.
6. Offenderet graviter Serenissimum Eegem Mariturn, a
cujus unius nutu et protectione pendet conservatio, propa-
gatio, vel etiam accretio Catholicse Majestatis in Anglia,
Scotia, et Hibernia ; et metuendum valde, ne exinde offen-
sus subtrahat suam protection em, permittatque Parlamento
PARTICULARS OF THE DEATH OF CHARLES II. 353
(quod iterum convocandum in Februario erat), ut, quod
superior! anno frustra tentavit, impediente liege, mine
mandet execution! leges pcenales contra Catholicos pridem
latas, et tune sequerentur innumerse confiscations bonorum,
proscriptiones sacerdotum, incarcerationes et mortes aliorum,
et denique clades gravissima, si nou exterminium religionis
Catholics in iis Eegnis.
7. Pietas et constantia Catholicorum in Anglia, Scotia, et
Hibernia in defendenda per centum et amplius annos auctori-
tatem Sedis Apostolicae, pro qua sola tot sustinuerunt car-
ceres, tormenta, mortem, rapinas bonorum et alia innumera
incommoda, merer! videtur ut eadern Sancta Sedes, quae est
mater pia omnium credentium, sed maxime certantium in
agone, riunc non det hanc afflictionem praesentibus Catholicis,
quorum mult! multa retro elapsis annis pro fide pass! sunt,
exponendo illos hac de causa irse Eegis, furor! Parlamenti,
periculisque innumeris cum maxima strage animarurn.
IV. (p. 103).
A BRIEF ACCOUNT OF PARTICULARS OCCURRING AT THE HAPPY
DEATH OF OUR LATE SOVEREIGN LORD KING CHARLES THE
2ND IN REGARD TO PtELIGION ; FAITHFULLY RELATED BY HIS
THEN ASSISTANT, MR Jo. HUDLESTON.1
Upon Thursday the Fifth of February, 1685, Between
Seven and Eight a clock in the Evening, I was sent for in
hast to the Queen's Back-stairs at Whitehal, and desired
to bring with me all things necessary for a dying Person.
Accordingly I came, and was order'd not to stir from thence
till further notice ; being thus obliged to wait, and not having
had time to bring along with me the Most Holy Sacrament of
1 Reprinted from a rare tract, entitled " A Short and plain Way to the
Faith and Church, composed many years since by that Eminent Divine Mr
Richard Hudlcston of the English Congregation of the Order of St Benedict"
London, 1688.
VOL. IV. Z
354 APPENDIX.
the Altar, I was in some Anxiety how to procure it : In this
conjuncture (the Divine Providence so disposing) Father
Bento de Lemos, a Portugcz, came thither, and understanding
the circumstance I was in, readily profer'd himself to go to
St. James 's and bring the Most Holy Sacrament along with
him.
Soon after his departure I was call'd into the King's Bed-
Chamber, where approaching to the Bed-side, and Kneeling
down, I in brief presented his Majesty with what service I
could perform for God's honor, and the happiness of his
Soul at the last Moment on which Eternity depends. The
Kino- then declared himself : That he desired to die in
£">
the Faith and Communion of the Holy Roman Catholic
Church, That he was most heartily sorry for all the Sins of
his life past, and particularly for that he had deferred his
Eeconciliation so long ; That through the Merits of Christ's
Passion he hoped for Salvation, That he was in Charity with
all the World ; That with all his heart he Pardon'd his
Enemies and desired Pardon of all those whom he had any
Wise offended, and that if it pleased God to spare him longer
life, he would amend it, detesting all Sin.
I then advertis'd His Majesty of the benefit and necessity
of the Sacrament of Penance, which advertisement the King
most willingly embracing, made an exact Confession of his
whole Life with exceeding Compunction and Tenderness of
Heart ; which ended, I desired him, in farther sign of Bepent-
ance and true sorrow for his Sins, to say with me this little
Short Act of Contrition :
0 my Lord God, with my whole Heart and Soul I detest all the
Sins of my Life past for the Love of Thee, whom I love above
all things, and I firmly purpose ly thy Holy Grace never to
offend Thee more; Amen, Siveet Jesus, Amen. Into Thy
Hands, sweet Jesus, I commend my Soul ; Mercy, sweet Jesus,
mercy. This he pronounced with a clear and audible voice,
which done, and his Sacramental Penance admitted, I gave
him Absolution.
PARTICULARS OF THE DEATH OF CHARLES II. 355
After some time thus spent, I asked His Majesty if he did
not also desire to have the other Sacraments of the Holy
Church administered to him ? He replyed, by all means I
desire to be partaker of all the helps and succours necessary
and expedient for a Catholic Christian in my condition. I
added, and doth not your Majesty also desire to Eeceive the
Pretious Body and Blood of our dear Saviour Jesus Christ in
the Most Holy Sacrament of the Eucharist ? His Answer
was this : If I am worthy, pray fail not to let me have it. I
then told him it would be brought to him very speedily, and
desired His Majesty, that in the interim he would give me
leave to proceed to the Sacrament of Extreme Unction ; he
replyed, with all my Heart ; I then Anoyl'd him, which as
soon as perform'd I was called to the Door, whither the
Blessed Sacrament was now brought and delivered to me.
Then returning to the King, I entreated His Majesty that
he would prepare and dispose himself to receive. At which
the King raising up himself, said, let me meet my Heavenly
Lord in a better posture than in my Bed. But I humbly
begg'd His Majesty to repose himself : God Almighty, who
saw his Heart, would accept of his good intention. The King
then having again recited the foremen tioned Act of Contrition
with me, he received the Most Holy Sacrament for his
Viaticum with all the Symptoms of Devotion imaginable.
The Communion being ended, I read the usual Prayers,
termed the Eecommendation of the Soul, appointed by the
Church for Catholics in his condition. After which the King-
desired the Act of Contrition : 0 my Lord God, &c., to be re
peated : this done, for his last spiritual encouragement I said :
Your Majesty hath now received the Comfort and Benefit
of all the Sacraments, that a good Christian (ready to depart
out of this World) can have or desire. Now it rests only,
that you think upon the Death and Passion of our Dear
Saviour Jesus Christ, of which I present unto you this
Figure [showing him a Crucifix] : lift up therefore the eyes
of your Soul, and represent to yourself your sweet Saviour
356 APPENDIX.
here Crucified : bowing down his Head to kiss you : His
Arms stretched out to embrace you : His Body and Members
all bloody and pale with Death to redeem you. And as you
see him Dead and fixed upon the Cross for your Eedemption ;
so have his Eemembrance fixed and fresh in your Heart :
beseech him with all humility, that his most pretious Blood
may not be shed in vain for you ; and that it will please him
by the Merits of his bitter Death and Passion to pardon and
forgive you all your Offences, and finally to receive your Soul
into his Blessed hands, and when it shall please him to take
it out of this Transitory World, to grant you a joyful Eesur-
rection and Eternal Crown of Glory in the next. In the
Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.
Amen.
So recommending His Majesty on my knees, with all the
Transport of Devotion I was able, to the Divine Mercy and
Protection, I withdrew out of the Chamber.
In Testimony of all which I have hereunto subscribed my
Name,
JO. HUDLESTON.
V. (p. 129).
EEPORT AND SUGGESTIONS SUBMITTED TO PROPAGANDA BY
ALEXANDER LESLIE, VISITOR OF THE SCOTTISH MISSION,
1681.1
(Cod. Vatic. Ottolon., 3182, /. 23.)
MOST EMINENT AND MOST EEVEREND FATHERS,
I think it is already known, as far as may be, to your
Eminences how I have obeyed your commands, and what is
the present condition of the Scottish Mission. Now, there
fore, I proceed to lay before you in brief, reduced to the fol
lowing heads, the points on which action seems to be most
urgently required ; and from my inmost hear if I most humbly
1 Translated from the Latin original.
REPORT TO PROPAGANDA BY LESLIE, 1681. 357
pray and entreat that your Eminences will diligently, and
with the greatest zeal and prudence, consider the matter, and
graciously provide for our necessities.
1. In the first place, your Eminences can see from the
result of this visitation, that most of the provinces are alto
gether infected with heresy ; in a certain number there are a
few Catholics, in some few there are many, and in one or two
the whole population professes the true faith.
2. Our countrymen are not altogether indisposed to em
brace the faith, nor very strongly opposed to us ; and those
who profess themselves most hostile are simply blinded by
false zeal and ignorance of our tenets ; for if they were pro
perly acquainted with them they would certainly not per
secute us, but would rather themselves be converted and
become most zealous Catholics and most ardent defenders
of the faith, as experience has shown on more than one
occasion.
3. We are in need of many and good labourers — many, in
order that every province may have its own missionaries :
good, holy, and learned, that they may be of service to
Catholics, and may succeed in converting heretics.
4. For the few labourers that we have is required ecclesi
astical discipline, guidance, order, and authority, that this
Church, oppressed as it is by persecutions from without, may
not be sullied by domestic scandals and contentions within.
5. We are in need of some temporal assistance, partly to
meet the wants of the faithful, partly to supply the poverty
and necessities of the missionaries themselves. As by the
indulgence of your Eminences I am permitted to propose and
humbly suggest remedies for these evils, I beg that I may be
allowed, by the same indulgence, to unfold in a few words
their origin. They all arise, in great measure :
«. First from the want of bishops ; had we preserved the
episcopal succession, we should have had labourers for the
different provinces, heresy would have been less prevalent,
the number of Catholics would not have daily diminished,
358 APPENDIX.
many converts would have been made ; and, briefly, ecclesi
astical discipline would have flourished, and the Catholics
themselves would have abundantly provided for our temporal
necessities.
&. These miseries of ours may be traced to the negligence
of those who, down to recent times, have been labouring on
the mission, with no superior to direct their work, or render
due account of his stewardship to the Apostolic See ; as is
very manifest from the fact, that as soon as by the favour of
the Holy See we obtained a superior of the secular missionary
clergy, and a certain organisation was bestowed on them by
your Eminences, the number of Catholics began, in compari
son with the past, immensely to increase, the heretical perse
cution in great part ceased, the number of labourers was
augmented, and many young men, seeing some one to lead
them, are now dedicating themselves to this holy service, and
longing to be inscribed upon our rolls.
c. Among our missionaries, and the more prudent men
amongst us, there is but one mind and opinion — namely,
that there is no more certain or more immediate cause of our
present evils than the bad administration of our colleges, and
the inadequate and unsuitable education of the youths resort
ing to them. It is from these sources that we acknowledge,
with great grief, that almost all the evils that afflict our
country have arisen ; and recognising this truth daily more
and more, we look for the fitting remedies from you, whom
the Holy Spirit has appointed to rule God's Church, and
most humbly implore your Eminences seriously to consider
the following petitions, and to decree accordingly.
Proposals of the Visitor of the Scottish Mission, submitted to
the Sacred Congregation de Propaganda Fide, A.D. 1081,
die . . . Januar.
Your Eminences are humbly prayed : 1. To deign to divide
the labourers on the Scottish Mission among the different
provinces of the kingdom, for the reasons already adduced by
REPORT TO PROPAGANDA BY LESLIE, 1681. 359
the Visitor in his report. And since all the secular mission
aries in Scotland, excepting only Mr Alexander Winster, and
the laity also, desire this division with all their hearts, and as
the fathers of the Society are either opposed to it, or declare
that it cannot be carried out in practice, it is prayed that the
superior of the secular priests on the mission, at any rate, be
ordered to distribute his missionaries through the several pro
vinces, and to prescribe to each the limits of his mission, be
yond which he is not to go except in case of urgent necessity
(the superior being duly notified), nor to exercise his faculties
elsewhere than within those limits. If this be done, the
fathers of the Society will be obliged, nolentes volentes, to adopt
the same system, since the faithful, having their own pastors,
will not require their services, nor will there be anything to
be gained in future by their discursive and occasional visits.
2. That in order to strike at the root of the contentions
and disagreements which may arise between the secular and
regular missionaries in Scotland, and in order that the laity
may not favour one side more than the other, nor think that
the secular clergy are merely the leavings of the Society, uni
form faculties be granted to all regulars and seculars, and
that the one do not enjoy more extensive privileges than the
other : the power, however, being reserved to superiors, if it
seem good to your Eminences, of restricting the faculties of
individual missionaries, according as it may seem expedient
to them respectively, for the reasons already alleged, and
according to the decree of the S. Congregation, dated January
16, 1646 (No. 9). Also that the superior, at all events, be
granted faculties to consecrate things for which the sacred
unction is required, and the power of dismissing from the
mission persons of disedifying or scandalous life.
3. That the Scottish Mission be placed under a superior-
general, with the power of appointing to office all seculars
and regulars ; and that the regulars be at least bound to
present themselves and exhibit their faculties to the superior
of the secular missionaries, so that he may be able to
360 APPENDIX.
admonish the clergy and faithful to receive in a proper
spirit their legitimate pastors, and to reject as vagabonds
those who unlawfully intrude upon the missions.
4. That whereas some of the missionaries have to labour
more, some less, and their wants vary accordingly, the
superior be permitted and directed, in the distribution of
benefactions and other temporal provisions, to have regard
to the circumstances of places, times, and persons, and that he
be bound to render to your Eminences a yearly account of
moneys expended, to forward the receipts for the said sums
to the S. Congregation, and to explain why he has assigned
a greater or less share to different individuals.
5. That whereas the experience of many years past has
proved that a comparatively small number of priests has
come from the Scotch Colleges, and in particular from the
College at Eome, and out of these few some have proved to
be useless, and others have forthwith entered religion, your
Eminences will deign to renew the decree (intimating the
same to those whom it concerns — namely, the rector of the
college, and the superior and procurator of the mission) :
a. That in future students be not admitted to the college
unless they bring with them the written approval of the
superior of the secular missionaries in Scotland. It will
thus be ensured that our superior sends out young men
suitable for, and desirous of embracing, the ecclesiastical
state, and he will inform them about the oath before their
departure, so that they will not come, as at present, knowing
neither whither they go nor what they seek, nor will so
many useless expenses be incurred. 5. That as soon as they
arrive in Rome and enter the college, they take the usual
oath ; so that the rectors of the college may not be able,
as heretofore, to turn the college into a novitiate, by not
administering the oath for six months (that is, until they
have seen whether the students are suited for the Society),
and by persuading them meanwhile to enter the Society's
novitiate — facts of which I am able to adduce irrefragable
REPORT TO PROPAGANDA BY LESLIE, 1681. 361
proof, c. That when there is a vacancy in the college, the
superior of the mission be notified of it, that he may be able
in time to arrange for its being suitably filled.
6. That the subsidies accorded by your Eminences to the
missionaries may be not only continued, but increased, in
view of the various needs and privations from which the
mission is at present suffering : so that the faithful, seeing
the liberality of the Holy See towards the labourers, and
finding pastors duly assigned to all the different parts of the
country, may be encouraged and induced to contribute by
degrees towards their support, and in a short time to relieve
the S. Congregation of the burden.
7. That the number of missionaries be augmented, not
only in the Highlands and the Hebrides, and in those places
where there is some hope of their being supported by the
Catholics, but also in localities where there are few or no
priests, by assigning a provision to such as can obtain the
means of living from no other source ; and that since we
have not at present sufficient native clergy, some Irish
priests be taken, who have already offered themselves at
Paris for this work ; and that a collection be made there for
their travelling expenses and other needs. The charity of
your Eminences is likewise entreated, in order to supply the
deficiency of priests for the Lowlands of Scotland. There
are two suitable ones now in Italy — namely, John Irvin, at
Pesaro, and Alexander Christie, in the Scotch College at
Home.
8. That the rectors of the colleges be directed to keep
places for students from the Highlands, and to receive at
once such as the Visitor found in those districts prepared to
enter college, and to embrace the ecclesiastical state. The
Scotch College at Rome is able to support two, or at least
one, more than its present number, provided that its annual
revenues are duly paid.
9. That the hospice for Scottish missionaries, which your
Eminences in your great goodness ordered to be established
362 APPENDIX.
at Cadome, in Normandy, be permitted to be transferred to
Paris, where half the Scotch College can be utilised for the
purpose. For at Cadome there is very great poverty among
the people, who are, moreover, burdened with a large number
of mendicant friars, nor is there any hope of obtaining alms
there for the support of our missionaries ; secondly, the air is
not considered good, but highly injurious even to the natives ;
and finally, the place is strongly suspected of Jansenism,
against which we ought to be greatly on our guard. At
Paris, on the other hand, the air is salubrious ; alms, at least
for masses, are always forthcoming ; there is an abundance of
books in the Scotch College, and also of pious and learned
men, so that the missionaries can there prepare with every
facility for the work of the mission. Lastly, it is very
possible that persons might be found there who would gladly
make pious bequests in our favour, if they once saw us with
a house established at Paris.
10. That your Eminences will deign to provide masters for
the schools in the Highlands, so that youths well versed in
humane letters may be chosen for the foreign colleges, and
others may be instructed in the faith. It is probable that,
when the allocation of priests is once made, the inhabitants
of the Lowlands will send their children to be educated in
these schools.
11. That your Eminences will obtain from his Holiness,
for the Scottish Mission, a large number of Agnus Dei and
indulgenced medals, for the reasons already adduced by the
Visitor, and on account of the many wonders which are daily
wrought by their means : whence Catholics urgently desire
them, as also that his Holiness will bestow on them some
relics for inserting in portable altars, as well as rosaries and
medals.
12. That there be granted to the superior of the mission
faculties (1) to dismiss missionaries, when there is danger of
scandal, &c. ; (2) to consecrate chalices and other articles for
which the sacred unction is required, so that we may not be
REPORT TO PROPAGANDA BY LESLIE, 1681. 363
obliged, as is both inconvenient and unfitting, always to beg
such things from the fathers of the Society, especially in the
Highland districts, where they seldom or never appear.
13. That the missionaries may be provided with the neces
sary church furniture, above all in the Highlands, and also
with chalices suitable for the mission; and that these be
bought at Paris, according to the recommendation of the
O * O
Visitor.
14. That your Eminences will deign to bestow an alms for
the purchase of books for the Scottish Mission, a list of which
has been drawn up by the Visitor.
15. That the missionaries may be allowed to exercise the
arts of medicine, surgery, &c., especially in the abandoned
districts, in which they may in this way gain a footing anew.
16. That no missionaries be sent to Scotland until they
have been carefully and strictly examined ; and that the
students, before promotion to holy orders, be examined with
the greatest strictness in the subjects which a missionary
ought to know.
17. That your Eminences will deign to grant to the
superior of the mission the power of appointing or deput
ing notaries apostolic.
18. That strict visitations be made of our colleges, one or
other of which will perhaps be found deficient, and that the
best possible discipline be introduced into them, in which
the students may be so trained that they turn out worthy
labourers in the Lord's vineyard.
19. That your Eminences will so arrange, in your prudence,
with regard to the legacy bequeathed to the S. Congregation
by Mr Francis Irvine, that the fund be withdrawn from Scot
land ; and to facilitate this, it will be necessary to defray out
of the principal sum the payments which the testator directed
to be made in Scotland, after which those concerned will
consent the more readily to the money being transferred to
France, especially as the executor of the will is an infirm old
man. (2) That you will please to pay out of the same prin-
364 APPENDIX.
cipal sum the legacies which the testator bequeathed in Italy ;
(3) lastly, that what remains of the said sum be so invested
by your Eminences that by the accumulation of the yearly
interest, and the adding of the same to the principal, the
amount may at length become so considerable as to be cap
able of better profiting the mission in whatever way your
Eminences may think fit to decree and determine.
VI. (p. 150).
KEPORT OF BISHOP THOMAS NICOLSON, FIRST VICAR-APOSTOLIC
OF SCOTLAND, TO PROPAGANDA. ABERDEEN, SEPTEMBER
21, 1697.1
(Arch. Propatj. Germania [Scozia?], Scrittur. riferitc,
1680-1700.)
MOST EMINENT LORDS,
Since I have lately arrived in Scotland, and during the past
two months have traversed various parts of the country, I
thought it my duty to inform your Eminences of this fact, and
to state briefly what is the present condition of the mission.
If I remained abroad longer than I wished or intended, that
happened not through my own fault, but by very great ill-
fortune, as was well known to their lordships the nuncios at
Cologne and Brussels.2 who assisted me with advice and with
what help they could, when our endeavours to remove the
obstacles proved of no avail. At the end of last October I
crossed over to England, where a few days afterwards I was
thrown into prison, and not released for seven months, and
even then the obstacles were not removed which prevented
translated from the Latin original. On the back is written, " Copia
presentata alia S. Congne- de Propag. fide, 2 Gennaio, 1698."
2 The nuncio at Cologne from 1696 to 1698 was Fabrizio Paolucci, after
wards Cardinal-Secretary of State to Clement XI. He died at Rome in 1726.
The internuncio at Brussels at this time was Giulio Piazza (Abbate di San
Giorgio), subsequently titular Archbishop of Rhodes, and nuncio at Cologne,
1703-1706. He became Cardinal in 1712, and died at Faenza in 1726. See
Cardella, Mcmoric Storiche, vol. viii. p. 123.
BISHOP NICOLSON'S FIRST REPORT, 1697. 365
me from entering Scotland. As, however, I saw that my
superiors wished me to go thither, and that this would be
more advantageous to the Church, I was willing rather to
expose myself to danger than to endure the tedium of
further delay; and although on account of the novelty of
my office, as well as for other reasons, I am odious and
obnoxious to the Government, and am consequently obliged
to live in the most absolute privacy, as far as I can, yet I
shall endeavour to be of service to the Catholics, and I trust
that God will give me grace.
We have but few priests, yet I think that the clergy were
never in a more nourishing state with regard to ecclesiastical
learning, piety, and unanimity. As yet I have met but few
of the regulars, and they also give every reason to hope
for the best. The faithful have suffered more of late years
from the contagion of evil living than from the fear of
persecution ; for many of the Protestants, disgusted by all
the changes in their sect, and by the contradictory oaths,
and wearied out by so much discussion, have begun to hesi
tate and to doubt about Christianity itself. The result is the
prevalence of the opinion that it is a matter of indifference
to what external communion any one belongs, while in other
cases men are falling into Socinianism, deism, and, I fear,
even atheism. Hence follows the neglect of all external
worship, and a corruption of manners which would be even
more conspicuous, were it not restrained by fear of punishment.
And this manner of life has been imitated by some Catholics
(although very few) to the sorrow of good men and the
scandal of the people. No better or more efficacious remedy
can be opposed to this evil, than that the young men in our
colleges should be fully and solidly instructed against these
pestilential ideas. This will be far more profitable to our
Church than the study of those scholastic subtleties, which
are considered by the wisest men amongst us as mere intel
lectual trifling.
The ordinary missionary faculties have been conceded to
366 APPENDIX.
me, and a petition for their amplification has already been
made in my name. I trust that your Eminences will con
sider our circumstances with regard to matrimonial cases,
and in what an exceedingly difficult position we are placed,
when recourse has to be had to the Holy See, or when a
contract has to be dissolved. For there are serious obstacles
in the way of the first course, and the second is often impos
sible : our laws sanction marriages between relatives of the
second degree, and pay no regard to occulta crimina, or to
certain other impediments ; and if we attempted to separate
those whom the laws of the country permit to be joined,
what storms and outpourings of wrath should we not call
down on our heads ? It would in truth be better and safer
to do without that faculty of dispensation (unless it were
necessary, to help the weak and avoid scandals, and were
on this account granted to the other vicars-apostolic) than to
be bound by the restrictions which would be necessary in
making use of it.
There are other matters, regarding which the procurator
of our mission will communicate with your Eminences when
opportunity offers. I pray you to hear him with your accus
tomed goodness.
I have not yet been able to visit the Highland districts,
where I fear that the labourers are few and the harvest
abundant. For two years past, on account of the unusual
storms and inclemency of the weather, there has been a
great scarcity of corn, and in consequence such poverty that
we have no means of defraying the travelling expenses of
those who desire to go to the colleges abroad. It is to be
wished that some help may be forthcoming for those who
are seeking to be enrolled in the ranks of the clergy. An
attempt was lately made to establish schools in the High
lands, but less successfully than we anticipated; for the
whole of that country is occupied by garrisons, and the mis
sionaries are not permitted to remain in one place, which is
greatly to our disadvantage. Experience has taught us that
in certain districts of the north, where the protection of a
REPORT OF IRVIN TO THE PARIS NUNCIO, 1698. 367
great noble, or a less hostile attitude on the part of the
people has made it possible for priests to reside, matters
go much better, for every day a certain number are recon
ciled to the Church. If one might judge from this, there
would without doubt be hopes of a rich harvest, if the state
of things were restored which prevailed nine years ago.
Meanwhile, for what is left to us we owe thanks to Almighty
God, who in His great mercy turns away the evil which our
enemies plot against us. We owe much also to our Holy
Father Innocent,1 who in the time of our distress has pro
tected us with the power of his apostolic office. To your
goodness, also, most Eminent Lords, to your counsel and
watchful care, we owe the strength of the bond which unites
us to the Apostolic See. We shall not cease to recall your
benefits with grateful hearts, praying God long to preserve
you safely to His Church. — Your Eminences' most devoted
and humble servant,
THOMAS, Bishop of Peristachium,
Vicar- Apostolic in Scotland.
ABERDEEN, September 21, 1697.
VII. (p. 150).
EEPORT OF MR JOHN IRVIN, PROCURATOR OF THE SCOTTISH
MISSION IN PARIS, TO THE NUNCIO IN THAT CiTY,2 ON
THE STATE OF THE CHURCH IN SCOTLAND. PARIS,
SEPTEMBER 5, 1698.
(Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scrittur. riferit. i., 1623-1700.)
MOST EXCELLENT, ILLUSTRIOUS, AND EEVEREND LORD,
Monsignor Thomas, Bishop of Peristachium, having, in
conformity with his office, to write to your Excellency as
3 Pope Innocent XII. (1691-1700).
2 The nuncio in Paris from 1696 to 1699 was Marco Delfino, a Venetian. In
the latter year he was made a cardinal, and in 1704 he died at Brescia (Car-
della, Memorie Storichc, torn. viii. p. 68). The original of this report is in
Italian.
368 APPENDIX.
Nuncio to the Most Christian King, that is, in the kingdom
nearest to that wherein his mission lies, and not being able
to write himself, by reason of the present movement against
Catholicism in Scotland, has charged me, among his other
commands, humbly to salute your Excellency in his name,
to make his excuses, explaining the cause of his not himself
addressing you, and at the same time to lay before your
Excellency the present state of the Mission, to the end that
you may have the goodness to extend your charity and zeal
for the faith to the afflicted Church of Scotland, and also
to recommend me, presently nominated procurator of the
bishop and the mission aforesaid, to the Holy See, in con
sideration of the circumstances truly narrated in the following
report.
The Catholic Church in Scotland is just now subject to a
persecution dating from the beginning of April of the present
year, when orders were transmitted from the Privy Council
to all the cities, provinces, and judges of the realm, com
manding the judges and magistrates to make search for
priests, Jesuits, and masters of Catholic schools, to imprison
them when found, and afterwards to take them under strong
guard to Edinburgh, the capital city, there to remain in
prison until the Council determined either to send them
into banishment, or to execute against their persons the full
severity of the penal laws ; and, moreover, requiring the
judges to report to the Council, before the first of June, as
to their diligence in obeying these decrees. Accordingly, the
judges of every province where any Catholics reside, and the
magistrates of the cities, made frequent expeditions in search
of them ; but by the grace of God, up to the day of my
departure, which was the 29th of July, not one was found :
the fact being that the priests, during the time of the search,
took refuge in the neighbouring mountains, rocks, and un
inhabited places, and when it was over, returned to minister
to the faithful by night, and in the morning before sunrise ;
and so the bishop and the rest, including myself, escaped
REPORT OF IRVIX TO THE PARIS NUNCIO, 1698. 369
from their hands. In order to procure some peace and quiet
for my colleagues, who are not so generally known as I was,
I let it be understood at my departure, by means of a letter
which I wrote to the judge of the district where Catholics
are numerous, that I was quitting the country, so as to give
no further motive for the persecution : to the end that he,
having reported to the Council that he had driven me away,
would be no longer urged on by the repeated orders of the
Council, and of Ogilvie, the Secretary of State, to molest the
others.
There are in Scotland ten fathers of the Society, of whom
three are newly arrived, and two others a little before them,
live of them live in the neighbourhood of Edinburgh : two
in the house of a country gentleman (Garleton), two with
another gentleman ([Wauchope of] Nicldry), the fifth in
Edinburgh itself, with his nephew Mr Buchan. The other
live had good lodging in the north: one in the house of
Count Leslie, one with Lord Seaforth, one with Pirtcapel, one
at Drumgash, one in his father's house at times, and at other
times in the houses of the gentlemen already mentioned.
There are four Benedictines — one in Edinburgh, another at
Aberdeen, a third with the Countess of Dunfermline, and the
fourth assisting the Highland Bishop.
There are twenty-three priests, besides two schoolmasters
and the Benedictines just mentioned, all maintained at the
expense of the mission : ten in the Highlands (of whom eight
are Irish and two Scotch), four in Banffshire, three in Aber-
deenshire, one in Forfarshire, two in Edinburgh, and one
twenty-five miles south of Edinburgh, in the district of
Tweeddale, with the Earl of Traquair. The two school
masters are in the Highlands, where the Catholics are more
numerous than in any other part of the country. The former
superior of the mission resides in the house of the Duke of
Gordon ; and besides those already mentioned, some of the
clergy have been banished, and within the last two years six
of the best have died.
VOL. IV. 2 A
370 APPENDIX.
It is now sixteen months since the bishop, released from
his long imprisonment in London, entered the mission, and
at once repaired to the north of Scotland, where there are
most Catholics, and where the faithful, deprived as they had
been of episcopal supervision for about a hundred and twenty
years, received him with unspeakable joy, acknowledging
before God the greatness of the favour which they owe to
the zeal of the Supreme Pontiff, Innocent XII. Here he
occupied himself, now in discharging his episcopal office,
confirming men and women of all ages, preaching, and in
structing both clergy and people, and now as a simple mis
sionary, visiting the sick, taking to them the sacraments, and
receiving into the Church the properly disposed, whether
sick or whole. Having in this way visited two provinces,
for the most part on foot, he wished at the beginning of
spring to go to the Highlands, where the language and manner
of living are different ; but he was obliged to postpone this
journey for a year, being dissuaded from it by letters from
the clergy, which reached him from all parts of the High
lands, testifying that it was impracticable that year for any
stranger to visit those parts, owing to the want of bread : for
three years in succession there had been no harvest, and in
the low-lying districts the scarcity was so great that they had
no meal to spare as in the two former years. So, seeing that
he could not this summer make his way to the Highlands,
he resolved to turn southwards, and to visit especially the
districts of Lothian and Galloway, where there are a con
siderable number of scattered Catholics ; but just as he was
ready for the journey, he was stopped, until my departure,
by the breaking out of this new persecution.
Such is the present state of the Scottish Mission, faithfully
described to your Excellency, whose influence is not limited
to promoting the interests of the Church at the Court of the
Most Christian King, but can also do much, when aided by
the knowledge of these calamitous events, to increase the
Catholic faith in more distant countries. Wherefore I hum-
REPORT OF BISHOP NTCOLSON TO ROME, 1700. 371
bly pray your Excellency, in the name of my bishop and of
his clergy, to deign to favour me with your powerful recom
mendation to our Most Eminent patrons, the Cardinals of
Propaganda ; so that, under the shadow of your protection,
I may the more successfully have recourse to the Holy See,
to obtain light, strength, and consolation for my persecuted
brethren.
VIII. (p. 151).
EXTRACT FKOM A VISITATION EEPORT OF THOMAS NICOLSON,
VICAR- APOSTOLIC OF SCOTLAND, TO THE CONGREGATION
OF PROPAGANDA.1
(Archiv. Propay. Scozia, Scrittur. riferit. ii., 1701-1760.)
Summary of Eeport of the last visit made to the Highlands
and Islands of Scotland, by Mgr. Thomas Nicolson,
Bishop of Peristachium, vicar-apostolic in the kingdom
of Scotland, in the months of May, June, July, and
August 1700.
5. From thence he travelled by rough and almost impass
able paths, in order to avoid the soldiery, towards the west
coast, which is inhabited by Catholics ; and having arrived
there on the fifth day, without having come across a single
inn or human habitation, he began the visitation ; and besides
administering the sacraments, he left good regulations for all,
to which the people as well as their pastors readily submitted.
The rest of the summer he spent in visiting the greater part
of the Islands.
6. The first station was in the Isle of Eigg, where he found
all Catholics, three hundred in number, very constant in the
faith, and always loyal to their sovereigns. A few years ago
some of these islanders suffered martyrdom at the hands of
an English pirate named Porringer, who held a knife to their
1 The original is in Italian.
372 APPENDIX.
throats, and forced them either to renounce the Catholic faith
or to die.
7. The second station was in the Isle of Canna, with 130
Catholics : after the visitation there he crossed over to the
Isle of Uist, which has 1500 Catholics, nine hundred of
whom were confirmed at twelve different stations, including
Benbecula, a neighbouring island. The other inhabitants of
these islands were passing the whole summer with their
flocks and herds on remote mountains. The owner of this
island, the chief of the clan Macdonald, and his cousin, a
learned and zealous man, and a Catholic, showed sincere
demonstrations of respect and welcome to the bishop and his
companions during their visit.
8. Thence they sailed to Barra, which is under a chief of
the family of Morniyella [MacNeill ? ], a venerable old man,
and the authorised catechist of his people : every Sunday he
instructs them in the fear of God and the purity of the true
faith, and he has the merit of having thoroughly indoctrinated
his people, and so kept them firm against the assaults of
heresy.
9. In this island many people are under the power of a
kind of vision, called by the natives second sight, in virtue of
which they foresee and predict unexpected and wonderful
events. This power is quite beyond their own control, and
the effects actually correspond to the predictions. The
bishop proposes certain spiritual remedies with a view to
delivering these poor people, but desires to refer the matter
to the impartial judgment of your Eminences. There are
some other small inhabited islets, depending on Barra, and
also fourteen which serve as pasture- ground for animals.
10. Towards the end of July he set sail to return to
Scotland, those seas being dangerous from the middle of
August to the end of spring. On his return he repeated his
visit to Arisaig, Morar, Moydart, Knoydart, Glengarry, &c.,
districts and glens dominated by immense mountains. . . .
During his visit he confirmed three thousand persons, pre-
REPORT OF BISHOP NICOLSON TO ROME, 1700. 373
scribed rules and stations for the priests, instituted two pro-
vicars, one Scotch, the other Irish (the latter is now in prison
in Edinburgh), charging them to watch over the rest, to see
that the regulations were observed, that a report was made
to him twice a-year of the general state of the mission, and
that notice was given to him at any time when his presence
might be of service.
11. The necessity is evident of providing for these
districts native missionaries; for it is exceedingly difficult
for foreigners, considering the hardships and inevitable
fatigues, to remain long in that part of the mission. The
bishop, on his departure for the Lowlands, left ten mission
aries, Irish and Scotch, of whom one was a Benedictine, the
others secular priests and Franciscans ; for the fathers of the
Society are not accustomed to these districts.
15. At the time of the Covenant the chief of the Macleans
imbibed heresy together with his education in Protestant
colleges, and through him the whole of his powerful clan ;
the chief has now returned to the true faith, but lives in exile
with his king, deprived of all his property : some other chiefs,
such as the Macdonalds, MacNeills, &c., remained firm.
16. To conclude, the sons of the other chieftains, botli
greater and lesser, having been necessarily sent to Protestant
colleges in order to obtain a liberal education, imbibed there
not only learning but heresy, which they communicated to
their friends and dependants, there being no missionaries to
stand out against them. For at that time the fathers of the
Society, unlike others, allowed no one else to enter the
mission, thus excluding the clergy, and every priest who
offered himself; while they themselves remained in the
houses of Catholic nobles, without troubling themselves at
all about the Highlands.
374 APPENDIX.
IX. (p. 177).
EXTRACT FROM A LETTER ADDRESSED BY ABBOT BERNARD
STUART, OF ST JAMES'S, EATISBON, TO THE CARDINAL-
PREFECT OF PROPAGANDA. KATISBON, APRIL 26, 1752.1
(Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scritturc rifcrit. ii., 1752.)
This monastery of Ptatisbon, which was always immediately
subject to the Holy See, and the Mother and Visitor of all
the others, has by the disasters of war and other calamities
of the time, had its revenues greatly diminished. The fixed
annual income is now a thousand florins, to which agricul
tural industry has added a nearly equal sum, so that we
may place the whole yearly revenue at about two thousand
florins, on which formerly eight, now seventeen monks are
supported.
Thirty years ago the seminary was erected here for the
education of Scottish youths, and the support of those relig
ious who served the mission. To it the late Bishop of Eich-
stadt, of the family of Knebel,2 previously deceased, assigned
the sum of 20,000 florins, and during his lifetime punctually
paid the annual interest of a thousand florins ; but it has been
impossible to obtain a single penny from his successors, as has
been abundantly shown by the many letters written by my
predecessor to your Eminence. Meanwhile, since the loss of
this foundation, we have, by means of the greatest economy
in food and clothing, continued to support the seminary from
the scanty revenues of the monastery, inasmuch as its pre
servation seemed to us absolutely essential for the preserva
tion of our three monasteries. Now, considering that out of
this small annual sum of two thousand florins seventeen pro
fessed monks of the monastery, as well as eight youths in
1 Translated from the Latin original.
" John Antony Knebel von Katzenellenbogen, Bishop of Eichstadt from
1705 to 1725. See Gams, Series Episcoporum Eedetia Catholiccc, p. 274.
LETTER OF ABBOT BERNARD STUART, 1752. 375
the seminary, together with the necessary domestic servants,
have to be fed and clothed, the church to be provided with
sacred vestments, candles, and other liturgical ornaments,
and, finally, the ancient ecclesiastical and monastic buildings,
and the seminary, to be kept in repair, it will easily appear how
sparely, nay, miserably, we are obliged to live, and how im
possible it is besides all this also to support missionaries in
Scotland, unless one wished still further to burden with debt
this monastery, already so greatly impoverished, and to
expose to the cupidity of heretics, or at least of Germans,
these poor remains of the formerly great possessions of the
Scotch, as has happened to the fifteen Scottish monasteries
now irrecoverably lost. That the same fate should not, to
the great detriment of our country, overtake the three small
houses which are left, must surely be the supreme care of
every honest superior ; and the more so, as each abbot binds
himself by oath to preserve intact, to the best of his power,
the property of the monastery.
Meanwhile I deplore the wretched condition of our country,
and the poverty of the priests who labour there, all the more
that I have some excellent men, well suited for the mission,
who only await permission to enter the country and the
Lord's vineyard ; and since the loss of our missionary endow
ments I know of no other remedy, except that the S. Congre
gation of Propaganda should please to grant to our mission
aries the same stipend as is enjoyed by the other missionaries
in Scotland. In this case we will continue our missionary
seminary, notwithstanding the loss of the endowments ; and
that such a course would be of the highest advantage to the
faith, the Church, the mission, and our country, is proved by
the following considerations : —
1. The vicars - apostolic are continually complaining of
the paucity of priests fulfilling the work of the ministry in
Scotland.
2. In this monastery there are, and always will be, good
men who are capable of assisting in the work ; but since
376 APPENDIX.
the loss of our endowments means to support them are
wanting.
3. Our seminary is an institution of such a kind that ex
cellent missionaries may always be expected to come from it ;
for the most promising youths are brought from Scotland at
our expense, and are educated for eight years in the greatest
innocence of life and morals ; nor are any admitted to the
religious life except such as show a true vocation and talents
suitable for that state and for the missionary life.
4. The missionaries who are called to Scotland from this
monastery undergo the same labours as the rest in the work
of preserving and propagating the Catholic faith, and appear,
therefore, to merit the same recompense.
5. The Katisbon missionaries have hitherto owed nothing,
and will owe nothing in future, to the S. Congregation up to
the time of their actually entering upon the mission. They
will receive their whole education free at the expense of this
monastery, and await, without in any way burdening the
Congregation, permission to enter the mission.
6. Finally, the missionaries who are called into Scotland
from this seminary and monastery, know that when they
have borne the burden and heat of the day in the vineyard of
the Lord, and, broken with age, are unequal to bearing it
longer, fresh labourers will be substituted, and they will be
able to live quietly in the monastery ; and thus with greater
fervour and confidence and freedom from worldly cares, they
will all cheerfully spend their strength in God's service.
In this way provision would be made for the mission in
Scotland and for the preservation of the Scotch in Germany
— a work which has been intrusted to my care both by the
Holy See and by that of Mayence ; and I can have no other
and no better protector than your Eminence. Wherefore I
most humbly beseech and entreat the Most Eminent Fathers
who preside over the S. Congregation of Propaganda, so to
dispose and watch over the matter, that the Scottish Mission
and the interests of our countrymen in Germany may be,
REPORT OF EPS. GORDON AND WALLACE, 1723. 377
under so august a protector, constantly provided for in the
future. — I remain, while I live, your Eminence's most humble
servant,
BERNARD STUART, Abbot (manu propria).
RATISBON, April 26, 1752.
X. (p. 186).
EEPORT OF BISHOP GORDON, VICAR- APOSTOLIC, AND HIS CO
ADJUTOR, BISHOP WALLACE, TO PROPAGANDA, OCTOBER
15, 1723.1
(Cod. Corsin., 856. 41. A. 6, pp. 313, 314.)
As the Bishop of Mcopolis 2 has lately returned from the
Hebrides, and we are able to be for a short time together, we
think it our duty to write to your Eminences as to the pres
ent state of the mission.
It is especially incumbent on us to render our most humble
thanks for the three hundred scudi which your Eminences
have so kindly granted to us in the great straits of the mis
sion, and which were at once transmitted to us by Mr William
Stuart, the procurator.
In the meantime, the preachers never cease to assail the
Catholics, nay, their pride is ever on the increase : it is not
sufficient for them to rage against our seminary and our
schools with the greatest hatred and malice ; in the remotest
corners of Scotland they stir up the most violent enmity
against us, and their ravings are heard in the most distant
islands ; in these districts especially where Catholics most
abound, they are daily planning fresh evils ; they have estab
lished there new conventions, or synods, of ministers, which
they call presbyteries, and by which constant war is waged
against the faithful, and continual annoyance inflicted on
them. Hence, in those remote districts the bitterness of the
1 Translated from the Latin original. 2 Bishop Gordon.
378 APPENDIX.
persecution has been too much for a certain number of the
faithful, against whom the ministers had excited the anger of
their lords. But in these same places, a much greater number
of the heretics are hastening into the bosom of the Church,
and some of the lapsed have sincerely repented of their
perfidy, and have been reconciled to their holy Mother, while
the apostasy of others has been followed by manifest judg
ments of God. What is most to be deplored and dreaded,
however, is the mortal enmity against us which has been dis
played by the Court of Britain in a recent parliamentary
decree, than which nothing can be imagined more cruel or
fatal, and to which nothing similar was ever issued in these
kingdoms ; for by it they are endeavouring to annihilate the
Catholic religion at one stroke. The pretext is a certain
formula of abjuration of the king to whom the realm most
assuredly belongs, according to the most fundamental and
sacred rights and laws of the kingdom, whose violation entails
the uprootal of the very foundations of the monarchy ; but, as
if in order to show clearly that what is really intended by this
fatal law is the immediate destruction of Catholics, nothing
can save them from ruin except the abjuration of the Catholic
religion, and every individual article of the faith. It is
marvellous, that the Catholic princes are so little affected by
the most evident peril to the Catholic faith in these kingdoms,
whereas the heretical princes are so greatly moved by the
smallest matters which touch the interests of their sects
in foreign countries. We therefore most urgently entreat
our most holy lord, from whose heaven-sent authority and
fervent zeal no one on earth can hide himself, to stir up and
foment, through his nuncios, the ardour of the Catholic
princes, which is now so cold.
In the midst of these perils and disasters, the missionaries
persevere with brave and constant hearts ; they yield to no
terrors nor persecutions, nor are they anywhere lacking in
their duties, but with burning zeal and immense labours bring
to all the light of faith, and with no little success in many
REPORT OF EPS. GORDON AND WALLACE, 1723. 379
districts, especially in the Highlands, of which we can affirm
that there have not been for a long time so many heretics con
verted as in this year. The laity also display such strength
of faith, and such firmness, that we know of hardly one in all
Scotland who has abandoned the faith, except a few in one
small island, the owner of which has used every kind of
force and cunning in order to deceive and overthrow certain
neophytes hardly established in the faith. Those mission
aries who watch over the seminary and schools, although
involved daily in the greatest dangers — for the ministers
have hired to apprehend them men of abandoned character
and ready for any crime — are yet so far from lessening or
intermitting their care and diligence, that they are rather
increasing the assiduity of their labours. Hence both sem
inary and schools are still nourishing, in spite of the fury of
the ministers ; and, indeed, we have made friends of not a
few of the more moderate among the heretics themselves,
who may afford us refuge and protection when dangers and
difficulties seem otherwise insurmountable, and whose help
we may be compelled to use to prevent our seminary and
schools being blotted out altogether. Thus, in case of
necessity, we may withdraw them from the eyes of our
enemies, not despising human means and assistance as far as
lawful ; but to Him alone we trust, from whose power and
wisdom nothing is exempt, who will easily break the snares
of the hunters, that we may be delivered, either by granting
us patience to endure to the end, or by bestowing on our
labours success greater than our hopes.
The Bishop of Cyrrha,1 albeit sick and infirm, has spent
the past summer and autumn travelling through the Low
lands, strengthening and confirming some, reconciling others
who had fallen out, animating and consoling all by word
and example, and in some places, where priestly help was
wanting, administering to the faithful the sacraments and
other spiritual assistance.
1 Bishop Wallace.
380 APPENDIX. .
Bishop Gordon, immediately after the last letter, made his
way to the remote Highland districts, and the Western
Islands, in the visitation of which he spent three months
and more ; during which time he endured no slight labours,
and administered the sacrament of confirmation to 2090
persons, the majority of the adults being converts, and
among them many notabilities. In each of the districts and
islands which he visited, a certain number of heretics made
profession of the Catholic faith before his departure, or some
similar occurrence took place, to the consolation of the faith
ful and the increase of religion. He went to some places,
and bestowed there the benefit of confirmation, where no
bishop had ever been before ; visiting principally those
localities where the people were much oppressed by fear of
persecution, and these he not only encouraged and fortified,
but inspired into them no little hope and consolation. He
put an end to dissensions which prevailed among various
noble families, arranged for the establishment of a new
school, and endeavoured to check rising scandals, and, as far
as possible, to help the necessities of the people. Finally, he
strengthened and animated the faithful, of whom a certain
number in most places were timid, and over-terrified by the
threats and perils of more serious persecutions.
These are the matters which it seemed right to us to lay
before your Eminences, whom may our most gracious Lord
long safely preserve to this mission, and to His Universal
Church, and load with heavenly blessings ; as is the fer
vent prayer of your Eminences' most humble and obedient
servants,
JAMES, Bishop of Mcopolis, Vicar-
Apostolic in Scotland.
JOHN, Bishop of Cyrrha, Coadjutor
V.-A. in Scotland.
SPEYMOUTH, October 15, 1723.
LETTER OF EPS. GORDON AND WALLACE, 1726. 381
XI. (p. 186).
EXTRACT FROM A LETTER OF BISHOPS GORDON AND WALLACE
(COADJUTOR) TO PROPAGANDA, AUGUST 13, 1726.1
(Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scrittur. riferit. ii., 1726.)
Monsignor James Gordon, Bishop of Nicopolis, Vicar- Apos
tolic in Scotland, and Monsignor the Bishop of Cyrrha, his
coadjutor, in their common letter, dated August 13 of this
year, give a clear account of the state of their extensive mis
sion, which is generally disturbed and afflicted by the per
secutions of the heretics. Notwithstanding, they represent
that in the district, or, as they call it, the province of the
Lowlands, our holy religion has not suffered much, thanks
to the assiduous and solicitous care of the missionaries, who
in turn have been consoled by the vigilance of both their
bishops, and by their frequent visits, during which they have
held sundry congresses and conferences with the missionaries,
for the maintenance and propagation of the faith. God has
blessed their labours with many conversions, as they describe
them, of which they give the particulars, and of which one of
the most notable was the reconciliation of a priest, who two
years ago turned Protestant with great scandal, for which he
has now made reparation by public penance, and afterwards by
an exemplary death. Moreover, the seminary, in spite of all
the persecution, not only has not deteriorated, but the number
of Catholic students has increased, as has been the case also
with the schools, which are everywhere firmly established.
In the Highland districts the recent persecution has been
most violent, insomuch that in the memory of man none
such can be recalled, and it is asserted to be the most serious
outbreak that has occurred there for 160 years. They [the
bishops] describe the cause of this, which they attribute to
1 Translated .from an Italian copy (dated December 13, 1726) of the orig
inal letter, which appears to be lost.
382 APPENDIX.
the rancour generated in the Calvinists by the fact that the
number of Catholics in the Highlands has increased three
fold, and that notwithstanding all their efforts to crush them
— among other means, the institution of a kind of society, or
what we should call a congregation, intended, as already re
lated, to send out agents and preachers to propagate heresy—
the Catholics remain constant in their religion, and repair
publicly to the churches, while neophytes are continually on
the increase, owing to the indefatigable care of the labourers
in the sacred work. Expeditions of soldiers have been or
ganised in various places, for the purpose of apprehending
the missionaries and their converts, a good number of whom
have been imprisoned. . . . But with regard to these, the
heretics have not gained much advantage by their evil intent,
for the Catholics have not yielded to their fury, nor have
the ministers ceased to do their duty with all fervour. As
a subsidy to the latter, the vicar-apostolic has sent them
. . . employing for this purpose the grant of 500 scudi made
to him last year by this Sacred Congregation.
Among their trials, however, these numerous and faithful
Catholics have lacked the principal source of help and com
fort which they received in the past, in the frequent visits of
the vicar-apostolic, owing to his present incompetency, by
reason of his age and indisposition, to make these long and
perilous journeys : nor could the coadjutor supply his place
in those districts, not only for the same reasons, but likewise
because he has no skill in the language there spoken, which
is totally different from that . of the Lowlands. Hence the
vicar-apostolic, considering the great need which these peo
ple have of a bishop who may constantly assist them, who
speaks their language, and who may be always ready to
succour their spiritual needs, especially as it is foreseen that
there is no present prospect of the persecution ceasing, ven
tures to propose, and to supplicate your Eminences to deign to
grant to the Catholics of the said Highland district a vicar-
apostolic of their own — a project which is deemed most
REPORT OF EPS. GORDON AND WALLACE, 1730. 383
advantageous and necessary by all the most experienced
missionaries, and by all the nobles and chief men of these
parts — leaving to him and to his coadjutor the province of
the Lowlands.
King James of England,1 in a very strong letter written to
the Most Eminent Cardinal-Prefect, also insists very warmly
on this step, and he does the same in another letter trans
mitted to His Eminence for presentation to our lord [the
Pope2]. Both agree in suggesting and recommending for the
office, as more suitable than any one else, the priest Father
Alexander John Grant, a native of those parts, adorned with
every quality requisite to one called to such a ministry, edu
cated in the Scotch College of this city, where he studied
philosophy and theology, and maintained in the Roman College,
with much praise, a public thesis on the constitution Uni-
genitus. He is strong and hardy of constitution, aged about
thirty-three years, of which he has spent seven as a useful
and zealous missionary in Scotland, always under the im
mediate supervision of the vicar-apostolic, and perfectly
known to the agent of the Scotch clergy, who gives the most
favourable report of him.
XII. (p. 188).
EEPORT OF BISHOPS GORDON AND WALLACE (COADJUTOR)
TO PROPAGANDA, JULY 4, 1730.
(Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scrittur. riferit. ii., 1730.)
MOST EMINENT AND MOST PLEVEREND LOEDS,
Since we last addressed letters to your Eminences, although
no general persecution has raged here against the faithful,
yet in certain districts, owing to the cruel instigation of the
preachers, they have been very severely treated by the
1 James III., commonly called the Old Pretender.
2 Benedict XIII. (1724-1730.)
384 APPENDIX.
authorities. In the Island of Mull, for example, out of
several respectable persons who had embraced the Catholic
faith, one, who was the best known, has been thrown into
prison, another has been forced to leave the kingdom, while
others have had to quit that part of the country, and have
hardly been able to find a living anywhere else. In most of
the districts where Catholics are comparatively numerous,
the ministers annoy them in a thousand ways, lay snares to
catch them, and in the case of poor persons especially, when
they will not conform to their wishes, get the magistrates to
harass and fine them.
We suffer under various other troubles, for on the one
hand the ministers, are multiplied, together with their
catechists and schoolmasters, especially in those places where
Catholics abound, are often thrust upon an unwilling people,
and when they can, and dare, under the protection of the
local landowners, drag into their temples, even by employing
force, farmers, artificers, and other poorer Catholics, beating
and driving them with clubs when they make vigorous
resistance. On the other hand, the number of missionaries
diminishes, and will further diminish, some of them abandon
ing us on account of the want which they suffer here, others
with their strength exhausted, and labouring under infirmities
and diseases ; while many others again threaten every day to
quit the mission, since we are unable to supply them even
with a tolerable subsistence. Most urgently, therefore, do
we entreat your Eminences to have compassion on this
mission thus miserably languishing, and to deign to afford
some succour to its very great needs. We, for our part, as
long as life remains, will not shrink from labour, and as far
as old age, infirmity, and sickness allow, will frequently
traverse the whole country ; but many parts we cannot visit
without deep lamentation, seeing as we do so many souls
perishing who would cheerfully receive the faith, had we
only labourers who might reside in their midst and instruct
them in religion, and seeing, too, not only countless little
REPORT OF EPS. GORDON AND WALLACE, 1730. 385
ones seeking spiritual bread, and we can give none to break
it to them, but also aged Catholics in great numbers, to
whom there is no one to administer the sacraments and other
spiritual helps.
We have received the subsidy of 400 scudi generously
granted by your Eminences, and most humbly thank you
for it. This sum, however, could only suffice to restore to
life for a time some of our half-famished missionaries, but
it could not provide for the continued support of clergy in
those districts especially where we so much desired to place
them. There are very many heretics who aspire to the faith
and implore our help, often entreating in tearful accents that
Catholic priests may be stationed among them, and promising
that if they are not abandoned by them they will profess the
faith with great readiness and constancy. We cannot with
out much grief listen to men of this kind, so piously inclined
towards the faith, and we grieve for them the more bitterly,
inasmuch as in very many cases we have had good proof of
their sincerity. For after the Bishop of Nicopolis returned
to Scotland, and made assiduous and frequent endeavours to
visit the Highland districts, in one place where there were
only about twenty of the faithful, now, since after some time
a pastor was placed there, there are at least seventy. In
another there were a hundred and fifty, more or less, now
there are six hundred and more; in another, again, there
were very few, now they are greatly multiplied. The number
of the faithful is, in fact, twice, thrice, in some places even
four times as great as it formerly was. This, however, we
can most positively assert, that if in all these districts there
had been up to now only as few missionaries or pastors as
there formerly were, we should never have rejoiced in seeing
so plentiful a harvest. But now, unless your Eminences
listen to the pious and plaintive prayers of so many souls
sighing for the faith, and generously assist this mission, not
only will innumerable souls be plunged in despair into the
gulf of perdition, but there is, moreover, the greatest danger
VOL. IV. 2 B
386 APPENDIX.
that the number of the faithful will greatly diminish, whils
those who are ignorant or careless, deprived of their pas
tors, are corrupted by the endless wiles and menaces of
the preachers.
There is now above all an urgent need, as we have more
than once pointed out to your Eminences, of appointing a
bishop for the Highland district ; for it is in that quarter that
there is the greatest danger from the preachers, since there
especially heretical ministers and pernicious schools are in
creasing ; and in that region especially there are many places
in which there is excellent hope of gaining large numbers of
souls, if we had the means of stationing several missionaries
among them. Those Highland districts have already suffered
no little detriment from being so long destitute of a bishop,
more particularly since the time when the name of Mr Alex
ander John Grant was submitted to your Eminences.1 But
since he has either departed this life, or persistently rejects,
with too great humility, the burden of the episcopate, we are
compelled to bring before the notice of your Eminences
another person whom we judge fit for the sacred office—
namely, Mr Hugh Macdonald, a scion of one of the noblest
branches of the family of the Macdonalds, whose influence
and numbers are very great among the faithful in the High
lands. He himself is distinguished even more for his zeal
and piety than for his honourable birth, and is also a man of
singular prudence and modesty. He was educated, and com
pleted his studies here in our seminary, applying himself
chiefly to those branches which are of the greatest use for the
confutation of heretics, or the solid instruction of Catholics in
the faith and in true piety ; but he never travelled to the
Catholic countries abroad in which there are colleges for our
countrymen. He is, moreover, a persona grata to the priests
labouring in the Highlands, as well as to the most dis
tinguished and most prudent of the laity, to whom we were
able safely to confide this plan of ours.
1 See ante, pp. 187, 188.
REPORT OF EPS. GORDON AND WALLACE, 1730. 387
The Bishop of Nicopolis has recently visited the greater
part of the Lowland district, also some of the less remote
portions of the Highlands, as well as the schools and seminary,
and although he is harassed with many cares and troubles,
nothing fills his soul with so much grief and sadness as the
cry of many peoples asking for missionaries, whom he is
unable to place amongst them, having nothing to provide for
their support. He is, moreover, overwhelmed with the com
plaints of many of the priests, who are ground down by
such penury that they say they can live no longer on the
mission ; and this sort of complaint, which indeed fell on his
ears painfully enough before, has now increased so immensely
that it causes him intolerable anguish, since it is out of his
power to apply any remedy. And he laments the more
bitterly over the deplorable condition of the people com
mitted to him, inasmuch as he himself, borne down by age
and sickness, cannot visit or assist them so diligently or
frequently, and now, instead of the abundant spiritual harvest
which he might once have hoped for (had not the missionaries
been so few, and those that there were were abandoning the
mission, or growing weak from want) he rather has good
cause to fear that the fruit of so many labours may in great
part perish. We cannot therefore but implore your Eminences,
most humbly and most urgently, to send labourers into this
your vineyard, by graciously bestowing the wherewithal to
support them.
The Bishop of Cyrrha, in the spring, fell very dangerously
ill of a complaint which in one of his advanced age there
seemed little reason to fear, namely hemorrhage, which fre
quently recurred, and reduced him to the greatest weak
ness. And although he appears to be gradually recovering
some measure of strength, it is impossible to hope that a man
in his seventy-sixth year, thus weakened, can ever be fully re
stored. . . . Meanwhile, as far as his health allows, he watches
with great zeal over the mission in the southern districts.
Of the missionaries, one left the mission and the country
388 APPENDIX.
at the beginning of winter ; another complains that his health
has been altogether destroyed by the hardships which he has
endured on the mission, and threatens to depart at once ; and
not a few of the remainder are beginning to cry out that
what with the loss of strength and health it is not possible
for them to remain long on the mission.
Our grief permits us to write on no other subject except
these troubles to your Eminences, whom may God long
preserve in safety to this mission, and to the Universal
Church, as is the fervent prayer of your Eminences' most
humble and obedient servants,
•k JAMES, Bishop of Nicopolis,
Vicar- Apostolic in Scotland.
* JOHN, Bishop of Cyrrha, Coadjutor.
SPEYMOUTH, July 4, 1730.
XIII. (p. 190).
HEPORT OF BISHOP HUGH MACDONALD, VICAR-APOSTOLIC OF
THE HIGHLANDS, TO PROPAGANDA, MARCH 18, 1732.1
(Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scrittur. riferit. ii., 1732.)
MOST EMINENT AND MOST EEVEREND LORDS,
Since I now have the honour of expressing for the first
time in writing to your Eminences my sentiments of rever
ence towards your Sacred Congregation, no duty appears
more incumbent on me than to render my most humble
thanks for your gracious opinion of me; which, however,
should I fail to justify, there will be little cause to wonder.
For it has pleased your Eminences to place upon me a burden
which even angels might fear to bear, and the duties of which
are so high and heavenly, that iny weakness cannot but stag
ger and fall under their weight. I have therefore no con-
1 Translated from the Latin original. The change of style in this and the
following letter is interesting. Bishop Macdonald's latinity is exceedingly
pure and elegant.— TRANSLATOR.
REPORT OF BISHOP MACDONALD, 1732. 389
ficlence in myself; for when I seriously consider my own
littleness, and the high dignity conferred upon me, who am
utterly unequal to supporting it, as well as the manifold
duties which pertain to it, I am struck with terror on every
side. My one only hope is in the immense loving-kindness
of the Father of mercies, who gives abundantly to all who
hope in Him, and richly rewards all who call upon Him.
Eelying, therefore, on His goodness, I may venture to
promise this one thing, that by His assistance I will spare
no labour, but will ever strive, as far as my weakness allows,
to perform neither negligently nor perfunctorily the sacred
functions of the sublime office with which I am unworthily
invested. To this, moreover, I am exhorted, and inspired
with no little courage, by the munificence of your Emi
nences, who, while loading me with this heavy burden, at the
same time endeavour to relieve my temporal wants. For I
have recently been informed by letter that your Eminences,
such is your liberality towards me, are granting me an an
nual pension of 200 scudi, and have besides given 100 more
for episcopal ornaments. Such generosity as this impels me
not only to render you my most humble thanks, but also to
profess with all my heart the most unbounded obedience and
reverence towards your Sacred Congregation and the Holy
Apostolic See.
Thus supported by your Eminences' paternal goodwill to
wards me, immediately after my consecration (which took place
in Edinburgh) I hastened to the remote Highland districts ;
in particular, to those places which seemed to stand most in
need of pastoral care and vigilance, and where, to shorten my
story, the pitiable needs of the faithful whom I came to
assist, in so great a scarcity of labourers, did not suffer me to
be indolent or idle. When I had laboured here for some
months, the wretched state of matters revealed itself to me.
The enormous tracts of country which, owing to the prevail
ing poverty, are necessarily assigned to each priest, vanquish
even the unwearied labours of the most diligent of pastors.
390 APPENDIX.
In the place of certain deceased priests, necessity has com
pelled the appointment of others from districts further south ;
and these, although of Highland family, want of practice has
rendered almost useless at our mountain language, which
they lost when studying at the colleges abroad. The faith
ful grievously deplore this scarcity of pastors ; and while
others enjoy in abundance every convenience for their spir
itual welfare, they constantly complain that their souls are
starving, by reason, not of the negligence, but of the fewness,
of labourers in the vineyard. A great number of the heretics
lament, in presence of the bishop or priest, with groans, tears,
and words that might move stones, over their own unhappy
errors and blindness; and having at length discovered the
impiety, avarice, and carelessness of their ministers, and had
their eyes opened to certain enormous errors, implore the
help of Holy Mother Church, and ask with continual and
unspeakable eagerness for Catholic pastors. Hence the
greatest sorrow is enkindled in my heart, seeing as I do that
the number of labourers amongst us who are versed in the
Highland tongue is so scanty, that they are not only insuffi
cient to assist Protestants of the kind I have described, but
even the very Catholics themselves.
Accordingly, when I considered what remedy could be
applied to so deplorable an evil, the most efficacious means
appeared to me to be that a seminary should be established
in our Highland district, for the education of boys suitable
for the ecclesiastical state. It will thus come about that
there will be a supply of students, more advanced and better
tested, to send to the foreign colleges, whilst others, ordained
here in the country, will supplement the scanty number who
come from abroad after their ordination. Out of the many
young Highlanders who, after as careful selection as possible,
have been sent to the Continent, various adverse circum
stances have caused a large number to abandon their studies
and the idea of ecclesiastical life, to return to the vanities of
the world, and so belie the hopes which had been formed of
REPORT OF BISHOP MACDONALD, 1732. 391
them. But if only after due probation in the seminary, and
progress in their studies, they are sent to the colleges, it is to
be hoped that more will bring their studies to a successful
issue, and adhere to their proposed manner of life ; and so,
their number being added to those who have been trained at
home, there will be in future such a supply of priests as will
suffice to mitigate or put an end to the complaints, outcry,
and tears both of Catholics and heretics. On the other hand,
without such an institution it seems clear to me that faith
and religion will never greatly increase in those parts ; for
there is very great danger that in the scarcity of priests under
which, in the absence of a seminary, we must always labour,
many of the weaker Catholics may be ensnared and caught
by the wiles and cunning of the ministers, catechists, and
schoolmasters, who are daily thrust in greater numbers upon
our people. But as our Highlanders are for the most part
poor, we shall have no means of undertaking so pious, useful,
and necessary a work, unless your Eminences give us a help
ing hand. I cannot, therefore, but urgently commend the
whole matter to the charity and zeal of your Eminences ; for
if it fall to the ground, not only all our labour will be well-
nigh vain and fruitless, but we foresee also the lamentable
loss of countless perishing souls. I am now making ready to
commence my visitation of the Hebrides and other remote
districts, in the course of which I shall leave untried no means
which may seem to be of assistance towards the speedy in
auguration of the seminary, trusting in your Eminences'
generosity, which I have already abundantly experienced in
my regard, and wrhich I hope will never be wanting to our
future labours and efforts in the cause of religion. — That God
may long preserve your Eminences to this mission, and to the
Universal Church, is the sincere and fervent prayer of, your
Eminences' very humble and obedient servant,
•k HUGH, Bishop of Diana,
Vicar-Apostolic in the Highlands of Scotland.
LAGGAN, GLENGABRY, March 18, 1732.
392 APPENDIX.
XIV. (p. 193).
EEPORT OF BISHOPS MACDONALD AND SMITH (VicARS-Apos-
TOLIC) AND GRANT (COADJUTOR) TO PROPAGANDA.
EDINBURGH, NOVEMBER 20, 1755.1
(Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scrittur. riferit. ii., 1755.)
MOST EMINENT AND MOST REVEREND LORDS,
Since by the providence of God we are all three here
together, and it is quite uncertain when this may happen
again, it is necessary that we should write a joint letter to
the S. Congregation, to render our most humble and hearty
thanks for their continual charity and innumerable benefits
to our mission, and in particular for the recent concession of
a coadjutor to the aged vicar - apostolic, in the conduct of
which affair the Bishop of Misinopolis 2 proved that he had
duly performed what he had promised not long before. And
assuredly the nomination made by the S. Congregation, by
which God showed whom He had chosen (and this was the
one thing that we desired) was received with the greatest joy
by both vicars, as well as by the rest of the clergy. Only the
elect himself was so afflicted with sorrow, that being, as he
was, before infirm, he was wellnigh killed by the bitterness
of his grief, which it was vainly attempted to soothe by means
of conversations and frequent letters. When the latter proved
of no avail, Bishop Smith made a journey to the north, an£
brought him back with him hither, in spite of his reluctance.
A reply, according to the urgent demand of the bishop, having
been received from the Cardinal Protector (to whom the elect
had written pleading his ill health), the latter, still refusing
to yield, asked for dimissorial letters to Ptome, where he
hoped to be able more easily to excuse himself from the
office, on account of his infirmity ; but here also he suffered
a repulse, and at length when he had moved every stone to
1 Translated from the Latin original. 2 Bishop Smith.
REPORT OF EPS. MACDONALD AND SMITH, 1755. 393
find a means of escape, as he desired with all his heart, he
was compelled to submit. According, by the help of God,
on the 2d of November (Sunday within the Octave of All
Saints) he was consecrated Bishop of Sinita, as he will duly
make known by letters patent to be transmitted to Eome at
the first safe opportunity ; and he himself will set out for the
north as soon as possible.
In the meantime, Bishop Hugh of Diana, who had previ
ously been forced, by the search that his enemies were making
for him, to retire to the Highlands, came to Edinburgh at the
beginning of summer on affairs of business ; and here it was
thought that he might remain hid for a time. But having
been betrayed by an infamous spy, he was charged with being
an enemy of the State ; and when no proof whatever of this
accusation was forthcoming, he was thrown into the prison
of Edinburgh on the customary ground of being a Eoman
Catholic priest. After a fortnight he was released, on account
of the state of his health ; but on these rigorous conditions,
that he should quit Edinburgh in two days, and repair to
Dunse, on the borders of England, from which place he was
not to go more than four miles before the 15th of November ;
and on that day he was to come up for judgment, or else to
pay a fine (for which he had to give security) amounting to
more than twelve hundred Eoman scudi. Accordingly, when
he appeared on the appointed day, he was strongly urged
himself to ask to be sent into exile : this, however, he utterly
refused to do, and his bail having been extended for another
month, he was ordered to hold himself again in readiness ;
nor is there much doubt that he will be sentenced to banish
ment, under pain of death if he ever returns to Scotland ; for
this, according to our laws, is bound to be the decision of the
judges. What, in consequence, will be the loss to the faith
ful ! This consideration only it is which fills the bishop with
the greatest grief ; meanwhile eighty scudi have been awarded
to his captor out of the royal Treasury in return for his
good services. The usual reward has in like manner been
394 APPENDIX.
granted to two soldiers for apprehending two priests, one of
them being Alexander Macdonald, who some months ago was
long detained in prison here, and then outlawed : afterwards
he fell very seriously ill, and now there is no hope of his
life. He will leave behind him great regret for so tender a
shepherd. . . . This same year Mr John Tyrie has been
suddenly removed by death, after ministering to a numerous
flock with great energy for many years: we shall also lose,
only too soon, greatly to our sorrow, R. Father Robert Shand,
a Benedictine monk of Ratisbon. . . .
In the many and great troubles under which we are
labouring, it is very manifest how much we need the help
of our most gracious patrons. Nothing could more conduce
to the advantage of the Catholics, than that the two little
Catechisms, which were long ago sent to Rome, should be
speedily returned to us, after such revision or change as may
have seemed expedient. On the other hand, nothing could
be more hurtful than their detention longer, which may God
forbid. About this most important matter I have written
more fully to the Cardinal Protector. We most humbly
entreat, therefore, that our most gracious patrons would
deign to give ear to this, the first petition of James of Sinita,
and the last of the Bishop of Misinopolis.— That God may
long preserve you safely to the whole Christian world, and in
particular to this afflicted Church, is the most fervent prayer
of, your Eminences' most humble and obedient servants,
•i" HUGH, Bishop of Diana,
Vicar- Apostolic in Scotland.
Hh ALEXANDER, Bishop of Misinopolis,
Vicar- Apostolic in Scotland.
•t JAMES, Bishop,
Coadjutor to the Bishop of Misinopolis.
REPORT OF BISHOPS GORDON AXD SMITH, 1743. 395
XV. (p. 195).
REPORTS OF BISHOPS GORDON (VICAR-APOSTOLIC) AND SMITH
(COADJUTOR) TO PROPAGANDA. EDINBURGH, FEBRUARY
5, 1743.1
(Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scrittur. rifcrit. ii., 1743.)
MOST EMINENT AND MOST REVEREND LORD,
It is now long since we have written to your Eminence, as
we have been expecting every month — nay, every week — to
receive the welcome news of the gracious decrees of the
Sacred Congregation regarding Scottish affairs, after the
various letters which both we ourselves, and other mis
sionaries, had written with reference to the melancholy state
of this mission. We were in hopes that these decrees would
be highly favourable to us, and that we should receive them
at an early day, especially as it was reported to us that they
were already in the hands of your Eminence. But now our
hope has been so long delayed, and the joy with which we
did not doubt we should be filled, since we knew well that if
decrees were issued in our favour by the S. Congregation the
affairs of this mission would go on much more happily and
more to the advantage of the Catholic Faith ; but on the
other hand, as things now are, so long as factions, dissen
sions, and quarrels go on among the very labourers them
selves, it cannot be that our holy religion should be held in
honour, or make successful progress, or that the conversions
of heretics should be as frequent as they were wont to be.
In truth, these bitter dissensions and disturbances and
divisions, not having been at the very beginning, when
they first raised their heads, beaten down and suppressed by
supreme authority, will always live and flourish amongst us,
unless that authority not only takes notice of them, but
promptly strikes and puts an end to them. We implore,
1 Translated from the Latin original.
396 APPENDIX.
therefore, and entreat your Eminence to be graciously pleased
at length to comfort, raise up, and strengthen us, placed as
we are in so wretched and deplorable a position ; and this
will be done to so much the greater joy and profit to the
mission, the more speedily the gracious decrees of the S.
Congregation are transmitted to us. If, however, we have
done anything to excite the anger and displeasure of your
Eminence against us, it is totally unknown to us, nor are we
conscious of having committed any such fault. Hence we
shall esteem it a great favour to receive intimation of the
same, in order that we may endeavour to acknowledge,
repair, and atone for it, with the greatest possible submission
and reverence, as we are most ready to do.
All this time, during which we have been expecting fresh
strength and weight to be added to our authority by the
S. Congregation and your Eminence, we have not been living
in idleness, nor have we ceased the laborious exercise of all
the functions of our ministry. In the winter before last the
Bishop of Misinopolis, while his aged colleague of Mcopolis
remained in Edinburgh, journeyed to the northern districts
(in which the Catholics are much more numerous than in the
south), and visited many of those parts, doing everything in
his power to alleviate the necessities, both temporal and
spiritual, of the faithful. After Easter he returned to
Edinburgh, for the meeting of the senior missionaries which
was to be held there, and at which all the affairs of the
mission were so carefully examined and discussed, chiefly by
his assistance, that no doubt regarding their proper adminis
tration could hereafter remain to any of those who had before
complained so loudly. This last summer, whilst he was
making his pastoral visits to many districts, his right arm
was by accident seriously bruised, and this being not yet
completely healed, he has been compelled to pass this winter
in Edinburgh. As for the Bishop of Nicopolis, during these
two years he has spent five or six months, in summer time,
in the north, has visited these various districts, and has
REPORT OF BISHOPS GORDON AND SMITH, 1743. 397
endeavoured with as much vigilance and zeal as possible to
encourage both clergy and people, and to put down certain
scandals. In particular, he made diligent inquiry everywhere
as to whether anything had been either said or done by any
one against the faith, but this he found to have been nowhere
the case. He was compelled, however, about two years ago
to punish the insolence and calumnies of a certain Jesuit
father, by suspending him from his faculties : the latter, after
remaining eight months in this condition, at last to some
extent acknowledged his fault, and made a general promise
that he would henceforth take diligent heed that no one
should be justly offended by word or deed of his ; however,
he did not afterwards desist from his unruly behaviour and
schismatical manner of action.
During the past summer we have lost a missionary of very
advanced age, Mr Alexander Drummond, a learned and pious
man, who had toiled for forty-five years in this portion of the
Lord's vineyard. About eight months previously died also
Mr William Shand, who for about twenty-two years had
been engaged in the same pious labours.
A certain number of heretics are from time to time
returning to the fold of Christ, and in most districts there
are several zealous missionaries who leave nothing undone
both to reclaim sinners and to draw aliens into the bosom of
the Catholic Church. But alas for our misery ! The conver
sion of heretics does not advance, nor do such examples of
virtue and of holy life shine forth among Catholics as was
the case in past times, in those bygone years when concord
and unity and peace and charity flourished. We have often,
with great sorrow, complained of the disturbing factions and
seditious combinations formed by certain of the missionaries ;
and would that we could at length hope that an end might
be put to them, so that we might be able to breathe freely
for a time, and peacefully rejoice in the work of our sacred
office ! But they do not cease with their seditious and
turbulent language to disturb the mission, and greatly to
398 APPENDIX.
obstruct the progress of the faith. For while, on the one
hand, they harass by their malicious arts the best and most
useful of our missionaries, on the other they deceive and
impose upon some of the younger clergy by their calumnies,
seducing such of their penitents as are weak or ill-disposed
by underhand suspicions and whispered insinuations, and
turning them against the others. We cannot think without
tears of the immense obstacle that this causes to true piety
and the propagation of the faith, and of the probability of its
exciting against us the anger and vengeance of God. If they
are allowed to persist with impunity in this odious and
detestable course, it is impossible to predict what will be the
result of this deplorable state of religion amongst us. A few
disaffected persons are constantly and publicly striving to
disparage by their calumnies, and, as far as they can, to bring
into contempt and render useless by their slanderous words,
our most hard-working missionaries, who are labouring with
the greatest fruit for the conversion of heretics and the
edification of the faithful ; whilst they themselves are useless
in every respect, making themselves, as they do, odious by
their actions, and depriving themselves by their malice of the
divine blessing. It is certainly to be feared that the best of
the missionaries will be compelled to abandon the Lord's
vineyard, as indeed they have threatened more than once,
unless a remedy be applied to the many evils in which we
are involved ; and we ourselves shall be obliged to abdicate
our authority, rather than continue to labour fruitlessly and
in vain, and see perpetually with the greatest sorrow and
constant tears, and vainly deplore, so many evils and scandals
which we are unable to heal. If, however, we are to remain
in authority here, we must necessarily use it for the correc
tion and repression of these men. Now they actually dare
to accuse and secretly calumniate us at the supreme tribunal,
and never cease insinuating into the ears of the common
people, and their own evilly disposed clients, their stupid
slanders against us. If, however, the supreme judges will
KEPORT OF BISHOP SMITH, 1747. 399
deign to make public the charges brought against us, it will
not be difficult both to confound our accusers and to clear
ourselves, and a way of vindicating our own innocence will
be opened to us ; so that we shall not for all time be evil
spoken of, though blameless, nor our enemies always glory
and triumph in their wrong-doing. And if we punish these
calumniators by censures, the eyes of simple folk will be
quickly opened, our reputation will be safe, and it will be
clear to all what manner of men these really are. Were the
Bishop of Diana here present with us, he would approve of
what we now write, and when he comes he will without
doubt write himself in the same sense. This is what we
thought it our duty to write to you, humbly begging your
Eminence to communicate it to the S. Congregation. — That
God may preserve you in prosperity, for the consolation of
His Church and of this Mission, is the fervent prayer of,
your Eminence's most humble and obedient servants,
JAMES, Bishop of Nicopolis, Vicar-Apostolic
in the Lowlands of Scotland.
ALEXANDER Bishop of Misinopolis, Coadjutor.
EDINBURGH, February 5, 1743.
XVI. (p. 196).
KEPORT OF BISHOP SMITH (VICAR- APOSTOLIC) TO
PROPAGANDA, DECEMBER 13, 1747.
(Arch. Propag. Scozia, Scrittur. riferit. ii., 1747.)
MOST EMINENT AND MOST REVEREND LORDS,
We had already written at length to the S. Congregation ;
but learning that our letter could not be transmitted (which
is now a much more difficult matter than before) it is
necessary to write again more shortly. Soon after our letter
of last year the Bishop of Misinopolis set out for the north,
400 APPENDIX.
against the wish of many persons who thought that the
danger was too great ; however, considering the urgent needs
of the mission, he deemed it his duty at all events to make
the attempt, and by God's help he carried out his plan
successfully, and visited with as little delay as possible the
districts destitute of pastors, administered the sacraments to
the faithful, and endeavoured to revive, sustain, and console
their flagging spirits. Many of the priests had been driven
away ; those, however, who had remained at their posts still
continued to minister to their people, and he found them all,
notwithstanding so many privations and dangers, quite ready
to perform their accustomed duties. Only Mr A. Godsman,
who had been liberated after a short imprisonment,1 was in
a very timid state ; but Mr Paterson, who had also been
apprehended, but afterwards restored to his place, recom
menced his former exercises, as did also Mr "William Eeid
and Mr D. G. Duncan.
When the Bishop of Misinopolis had met each of the
missionaries, had given them advice suitable to their several
circumstances, and fixed the different stations, he assigned
the places which were without pastors to the care of the
nearest priests ; as, for example, the district round the river
Dee, where the Eev. Father Leith, a Cistercian, had recently
died, after about fifteen years' arduous labours — a great lover
of peace. . . . The Eev. Father A. Gordon, S.J., also died in
captivity : he had laboured with great zeal and energy, and
was greatly opposed to the spirit of faction.2 Three fathers
of the same society, now in the north, with a number of
others in the south, as well as the rest of the clergy, diligently
minister to the faithful committed to them.
In the course of this visitation, what he had already heard
of with sorrow he was now still more grieved to see, — namely,
not only demolished and burnt-down houses where religious
1 He had been confined at Fochabers, but only apparently for one day. —
TRANSLATOR.
2 He died in prison at Inverness, May 1746. — TRANSLATOR.
REPORT OF BISHOP SMITH, 1747. 401
assemblies were formerly held, and the seminary of Scalan
in the same condition, but also — still more melancholy
spectacle — the ruin of spiritual edifices. To this latter evil,
however, a more prompt and efficacious remedy seems to be
forthcoming, by the divine goodness, than to the external
loss ; for the bishop has already himself recovered some of
the wanderers, and has learned that others are returning,
and has taken counsel with his clersv for the brinolno-
Ow O o
back of the remainder.
After the bishop had travelled through the districts on the
east coast, he endeavoured, through the respective superiors
of the missions, to establish by written documents the arrange
ments which he had already made in different places.
Easter being past, and certain business matters transacted,
he visited the northern districts, and did his best to complete
the work begun in the previous visitation, and to carry
through a little more fully what he had been unable to do
before. But though the violence of the storm was now over,
tranquillity did not at once follow ; nay, the exterior wounds,
there being no one to heal them, even grew worse, but our
internal losses, by God's goodness, are in many cases being-
repaired, for many who through fear or fraud had fallen
away are now returning. Some, indeed, persist in their
errors, but this loss is to a certain extent compensated by
others, who in spite of dangers flock to the Church of their
own accord ; and these, if not equally numerous, are at all
events greatly superior in merit to the former.
With reference to the priests of the same vicariate, Mr
Campbell has died from the effects of his wounds,1 and
Father A. Cameron, S.J.,2 has succumbed to the fatigues
occasioned by his voyages. Mr A. Macdonald and Mr A.
1 Colin Campbell, a brother of Sir Duncaa Campbell of Lochnell, and a con
vert to Catholicism. He was present at Culloden, and received there the
wounds of which he died. — TRANSLATOR.
2 See Butler, Hist. Memoirs (3d edit.), vol. ii. p. 445. F. Cameron died
in captivity at Gravesend, Oct. 19, 1746. — TRANSLATOR.
VOL. IV. 2 C
402 APPENDIX.
Forrester, and Fathers John and Charles Farquharson, S.J.,1
after a lengthened imprisonment on board ship, have finally
been banished. Mr James Grant, infirm before, and still
more so now after long imprisonment, is not yet able to
return to the Highlands. These having been taken from
us, and Father Colgan, an Irish friar, being also absent, the
only ones now left are Mr Angus Maclauchlan, who, though
worn out with labours, old age, and sickness, still ministers
to certain of the faithful ; . . . also Mr William Harrison 2
and Mr Angus MacGillis, who travel alone, with great zeal,
through the western districts, and penetrate as far as the
distant islands. All these the bishop as soon as he was
able, and thereafter as often as occasion offered, has con
soled and exhorted by letters. Lastly, he saw in Braemar
Father Gordon, S.J., diligently labouring, and thence he re
turned to Edinburgh by way of the mountains of Athole.
As soon as the bishop was able to visit and encourage the
priests, next after spiritual motives he chiefly made use of
this argument — which appeared to them a very effectual one
— that all the three bishops had long ago written at full
length to the S. Congregation about our internal disturb
ances, that they had also laid the recent troubles before our
most eminent Protectors, from whom the proper remedies for
evils of every kind were to be looked for. Moreover, when
1 Alan Macdonald had been one of the companions of Charles Edward.
After more than a year's imprisonment (1746-47) in Newgate and on board a
man-of-war, he was banished for life ; but he returned to Scotland in 1748,
and laboured on the mission till his death in 1781.
Alexander Forrester, a native of Ross, spent many years on the mission in
Uist. He also was imprisoned and banished in 1746, but returned to Scotland
two years later.
Fathers Charles and John Farquharson, S.J., were brothers, natives of
Braemar. The former survived until 1793.
Father John served the mission of Strathglass for many years ; he was
apprehended there in 1745, while saying mass, and taken to Edinburgh in
his sacerdotal vestments. After much suffering, and several years spent
abroad, he came back to Scotland, and lived with his nephew at Inveray. —
Oliver, Collections S.J. , p. 6. — TRANSLATOR.
3 Alias Hatmaker, one of the few priests who escaped arrest in 1746. He
died in 1773. — TRANSLATOR.
REPORT OF BISHOP SMITH, 1747. 403
he [the bishop] had received letters as to the promised assist
ance, he hastened to notify the fact to the priests, whom in
consequence he has this year delayed to visit, inasmuch as,
seeing their hopes frustrated, they not unnaturally com
plained that they had been neglected and deceived ; while
there were not wanting those who openly declared that it
could never be that our most gracious Protectors would have
so long deferred the necessary remedies for these urgent
needs if the true state of the mission had been properly set
before them. And, indeed, it is certain that in all former
time this mission was in such esteem and favour with the
Holy See that it never implored help in vain in its neces
sities or troubles. Nor are we now conscious of any crime
on account of which we deserve to be repulsed. But if we
have haply sinned in ignorance, we beg that it may be made
known to us, that we may be justly punished unless we
amend. If, however, the Bishop of Misinopolis is in any
way the cause or the occasion of this disturbance, why
should he not be cast into the sea that so the storm may
cease ? happy if by this or any other means, nay, even by his
death, he may restore tranquillity to the Church. If he be
guilty, why should he be borne ? if innocent, why punished ?
for hardly could a greater punishment be inflicted than to
be abandoned by our most eminent Protectors. When, after
the death of James, Bishop of Nicopolis, of pious memory,
he was compelled to undertake the whole burden alone, he
protested that he was not only unworthy but also altogether
incapable of bearing it, as indeed he would never have
dared to do unless relying on the benevolence, leaning on
the authority, and sustained by the influence of their
Eminences. Without this support, he will be obliged to lay
it down, after labouring to the best of his power for some
forty years in .the cause of religion.
If, however, it seem good to the S. Congregation to demand
his further ministry, he does not refuse to undergo the labour
as far as his strength will permit, provided only that he is
404 APPENDIX.
supported by their Eminences' protection. For this end
certain things are necessarily required ; the first being that
the most pernicious faction which has too long disturbed our
peace should at length be absolutely put an end to by decree
of the supreme tribunal. It will be comparatively easy now
to repress this growing evil, which later on, if the matter is
delayed, and it is allowed to increase and prevail, it will be
hardly possible ever to eradicate. In this affair, which is of
•so great importance, our mission has long ago entreated, and
does by the present deputation and by this letter now beseech
you, in union with the prayers and tears of all the bishops in
this realm, and especially of the late most vigilant pastor
James, Bishop of Nicopolis, of pious memory, who was so
esteemed by the Holy See, who merited so well of this mission
(of which he knew so well and took so to heart all the needs),
and who appears worthy to have some consideration paid to
his last petition, which may be justly considered the dying
wish of that great bishop. And we ask leave to commend to
you most earnestly Mr Patrick Leith, our appointed delegate
in this cause.
Moreover, it is necessary, as our former letters have stated,
that a coadjutor should be granted to this vicariate by the
Holy See. It is certain that when the late Bishop of Nico-
polis obtained this favour, he was some years younger than
the Bishop of Misinopolis now is, and much stronger both in
mind and in body : besides, in our present most serious
troubles, there is a more grave necessity for such a measure.
Lastly, it is needful that the proper remedies should be ap
plied without delay to the evils under which clergy and
people have been, and still are, suffering ; for our little bark,
albeit much tossed about by the waves, is by the singular
goodness of God not yet overturned. If, however, it be aban
doned by the Holy See, needs must that it perish. Therefore
we again and again entreat our most gracious Protectors, with
all possible humility, to raise up the bishops and clergy who
have so long lain prostrate at their feet, and to deign speedily
REPORT OF EPS. MACDONALD AND SMITH, 1753. 405
to take pity on and assist this long afflicted Church, lest the
remedy, if further delayed, chance to be applied too late. —
That Almighty God may long preserve your Eminences in
safety to this mission, and to the whole Christian world, is the
most fervent prayer of, your Eminences' most humble and
obedient servant,
•fr- ALEXANDEE, Bishop of Misinopolis,
Vicar-Apostolic in the Lowlands of Scotland.
December 13, 1747.
XVII. (p. 198).
REPORT OF BISHOPS MACDONALD AND SMITH (VICARS-
APOSTOLIC) TO PROPAGANDA. EDINBURGH, NOVEMBER 1,
1753.1
(Archiv. Propag. Scozia, Scrittur. riferit. ii., 1753.)
MOST EMINENT AND REVEREND LORDS,
During the past year both the vicars- apostolic wrote to
your Eminences conjointly. The Bishop of Misinopolis after
wards sent two letters, but he is still ignorant whether they
have reached you. The Bishop of Diana, exposed to many
and continual perils by land and sea, and persuaded by the
advice of friends, was compelled to yield to necessity and to
make his escape for a time, but with the intention of return
ing to his people as soon as possible. And now that these
evil times have brought us again together, it is a pleasure to
us to unite in writing to the Sacred Congregation.
For some years past we have been suffering more than
ordinary persecution. Sometimes, indeed, it happens by the
mercy of God that the excessive virulence of our enemies is
somewhat relaxed; but then, under the instigation of ma
levolent persons, it suddenly breaks out with new violence :
the soldiers too, in hopes of gaining as much money as
they know has already been paid to their comrades for
1 Translated from the Latin original.
406 APPENDIX.
captured priests, are constantly endeavouring to lay hands
on the clergy. Father John Farquharson, S.J., was com
mitted to prison, but on giving bail was set at liberty ;
now, however, the recognisance having been forfeited, it is
uncertain how the affair will end. Mr Alex. Macdonald was
apprehended in mistake for the Bishop of Diana, whom the
soldiers were after, and was placed in confinement ; but he
also has been given his liberty, on a friend giving security to
pay a large sum to the authorities in case he did not present
himself for judgment within a certain time, in which event
he would certainly be proscribed. Very lately, in the county
of Banff, where there are a great many Catholics, the judge
despatched a company of soldiers to arrest four priests, all of
whom, however, by the help of God, happily escaped, although
still in great danger ; meanwhile he ordered certain houses,
in which religious meetings were held, to be closed and sealed
up, a fine of four hundred scudi being fixed as a penalty for
the celebration of mass there in future. In these troubles
we do not complain of the highest authorities of the realm,
whose moderation, on the contrary, we gratefully acknow
ledge, for they always profess themselves unwilling to perse
cute any one for the sake of religion. Their indulgence,
however, profits us but little, since the inferior officials, and
even the common soldiers, do not cease to harass us. Nor,
assuredly, can we look for peace so long as our persecutors
have hope of reward. God grant us patience, so long as He
wills us to suffer.
Would that, with the increase of evils without, our internal
troubles were diminishing ! but, sad to say, we see that dis
cipline is becoming relaxed in these calamitous times. The
vicars-apostolic have long been thinking how best to repair
this evil ; and now, a number of prudent priests having met
and taken counsel together, we have agreed as to certain reme
dies. Among other things, we undertake ourselves to observe,
and have proposed to the missionaries also to observe, the
excellent regulations not long ago laid down by our most holy
REPORT OF EPS. MACDONALD AND SMITH, 1753. 407
lord [the Pope] for the English missions ; l and we earnestly
entreat that these may be extended to Scotland. This is also
looked for by the superior of our Jesuits, to whom we have
shown the regulations, and who has already promised to ob
serve them himself in future. If the Fathers of the Society
had complied before with the request of the late very kind
Bishop of Mcopolis, who asked for the transference to
some other station of a certain over-zealous member of their
body, many scandals would have been avoided. ... In his
place has succeeded a good and peaceable man, as are also
the rest ; and we hope, if only Father Tyrie would keep quiet,
to enjoy, with the help of our most eminent Protectors, our
former tranquillity. . . .
Some months ago the Bishop of Diana, weighed down by
cares, fell sick and was very near death; nor does he yet
enjoy sufficiently good health to be equal to his most heavy
burden. As for the Bishop of Misinopolis, worn out by la
bour, anxiety, and age, he has been suffering from a sickness
more prolonged than ever before, and now after a brief inter
val he feels that it has returned and is daily increasing ; nor
can an old man of seventy look for much relief, nor for the
strength needful for discharging duties so manifold and so
important. We both humbly entreat, therefore, that for the
good of religion another bishop may be granted as speedily as
possible.
We beg also of our most eminent Protectors, that they will
be graciously pleased to take such measures as in their pru
dence may seem good, for the better utilising the Scottish
Benedictine monks in Germany in the cause of religion and
their country ; for when we asked for labourers from thence
to assist us, the Abbot of Katisbon replied that their mission
ary funds had been lost, and that, consequently, they could
not send subjects to Scotland to be supported at their own
cost. But how is anything to be spared to them from the
1 The allusion is to the regulations for the English missions issued by Pope
Benedict XIV., May 30, 1753.
408 APPENDIX.
scanty allowance of the secular clergy, who can themselves
hardly be supplied with the barest necessaries ? It is for
this reason that several of them make frequent complaints of
the vicars - apostolic, as though they had never sufficiently
represented to our most gracious Protectors the sufferings of
the missionaries. But as we have done this so often, we are
ashamed and reluctant to repeat it here. This, however, we
may be allowed to observe : one of their number, whom it
little becomes to act thus, is constantly crying out (and also
exciting others) about the distribution of the last grant of 200
scudi, which, nevertheless, was made in accordance with the
intention and desire of the benefactors. Therefore we again
and again implore our most gracious Patrons, with all pos
sible humility, to deign to have compassion on this afflicted
Church. — And that Almighty God may long preserve you in
safety to the whole Christian world, and to our missions in
particular, is the most fervent prayer of, your Eminences'
most obedient humble servants,
^ HUGH, Bishop of Diana,
Vic.-Apost. in the Highlands of Scotland.
•J4 ALEXANDEK, Bishop of Misinopolis,
Vic.-Apost. in the Lowlands of Scotland.
EDINBURGH, November 1, 1753.
XVIII. (p. 208).
EXTRACT FROM THE REPORT OF MGR. LERCARI, PRO-NUNCIO AT
PARIS, TO THE CARDINAL-PREFECT OF PROPAGANDA, AS
TO THE SCOTCH COLLEGE AT PARIS.*
(Archiv. Vatic., Nuntiatura di Francia, torn. 262.)
MOST EMINENT AND MOST REVEREND LORD,
I have up to now been in search of information to verify the
reports already made to the S. Congregation of Propaganda
1 Translated from the Italian original. Lercari was in charge of the Paris
REPORT OF MGR. LERCART, 1737.
respecting disorders in the Scotch College here. With regard
to their teaching, I am able to inform your Eminence that I
find that before the promulgation of the constitution Unigeni-
tus pure Jansenism was taught ; and since the constitution
was published, not only has the College given no sign of
submission, but the superiors have shown themselves openly
opposed to it, and had even the temerity, in the year 1718,
to appeal to a future Council. A proof of the truth of this is
that their act of appeal having been afterwards produced at
an assembly of the French clergy, the College was forthwith
deprived of the annual pension which had previously been
paid to it. At that time Charles Whiteford was procurator
of the College, and Thomas Innes, prefect of studies. Thomas,
later, resigned that office to his brother George, and there is
also there Louis Innes, their uncle, known as the Abbe, and
formerly almoner to James II. These three Inneses, all
alike Jansenists, joined Whiteford in the appeal, and they
have always resided in the College. There is no doubt that
Whiteford has recalled his appeal, but the act has not been
published in Paris, where he would be bound to repair the
scandal which he has caused. It is not known that George
Innes, or Alexander Gordon, the present prefect of studies,
has made any act of acceptation of the bull, so that little
regard should be paid to the letter subscribed by them in
1735, and sent in order to justify themselves in the eyes of
the S. Congregation ; and the more so, as they keep up the
same correspondence as before with the Jansenists, and are
entirely dependent on Thomas and Louis Innes, the latter
being themselves appellants, and retaining absolute power
over the community, in which, according to the opinion of
all the Catholics of Paris, Jansenism is taught just as much
as it formerly was.
nunciature during the absence of the nuncio, Raniero Dolci, titular Archbishop
of Rhodes. The latter was appointed by Clement XII. to the Archbishopric
of Ferrara, and was raised to the purple on December 20, 1737. In 1750
Lercari held the office of Secretary of the Congregation of Propaganda. See
Cardella, Mcmoric Sloriche, torn. viii. p. 283.
410 APPENDIX.
The character of Thomas Innes is sufficiently well known.
Not only as prefect of studies did he insinuate the very
contrary to Catholic doctrines, but being at the same time
confessor at St Barbe, lie brought thither his students to
perform their spiritual exercises, and so to receive the
Jansenistic instructions which were at that time being given
there ; nor is it known that he has since changed his opinions.
Louis Innes is still better known. He has perverted the
Scotch, who are residing in the royal palace at St Germain-
en-Laye, and he is at this moment the director of all those
families, and regarded by them all as their apostle. Among
his disciples is my Lord Milton, and, to still greater extent,
his relation, my Lord Perth, who is so far committed in
favour of Jansenism, that he would not even be present at
the mission given last year by the Jesuits in the city of St
Germain, retiring during that time to Paris, to the Scotch
College. From this it can be inferred how much harm has
been, and is still being done by this Louis in the College,
where he is looked on as an oracle.
Were it true, as has been represented to the S. Congrega
tion in defence of the superiors of the College, that when
Cardinal de Noailles l issued his appeal they boldly opposed
it, and did not adhere to the appeal, the assembly of clergy
would not have deprived them of their pension. I do not
find any evidence for the story of the law which they allege
was made by them at that time, against any one refusing
to pay due submission and obedience to the constitution
Unigenitus, and to the other Apostolic decrees ; and although,
after the resolution of the clergy of which I have spoken,
two or three students were expelled from the College for
having spoken everywhere in unmeasured terms against the
constitution, yet I am told that this was universally believed
to be a mere outward formality, and not a sincere proof of
due submission.
1 The relation of this prelate to the Jansenistic movement has been treated
by Schrill in The Constitution Unigenitus : Freiburg, 1876.
REPORT OF MGR, LERCARI, 1737. 411
On the other hand, I find the fact well authenticated, that
simultaneously with the commencement of the episcopate of
the present Archbishop of Paris, the superiors of the Scotch
College sent several of their students to receive orders out
side this diocese, among them being the well-known John
Gordon, who, in order not to be obliged to subscribe the formu
lary here, went to receive the subdiaconate from Mgr. Gordon.
It is also, I find, only too true that John Tyrie received ' erro
neous impressions in the College here, before he went to
Scotland and apostatised ; and that as it is generally the case
that the students who come from the College at Eome re
main here at least a year, to be instructed in controversy and
morals, which of course they require for their missionary
duties, they become in consequence imbued with the errors
of Jansenism.1 . . .
It is well known that the notorious Scotchman, Law,2 who
possessed such influence in France at the time of the Eegency,
gave to the College a large quantity of bank shares or notes ;
but there is no doubt that these have had the same fate as
other property of the same kind in this country, and that
very little of it is now left.
Your Eminence cannot imagine what difficulty there is
in obtaining any information respecting the College, whose
administrators make a secret of everything. . . . Notwith
standing this excessive caution, we have learned sufficient
from other sources to know that the College is in need of
complete reform, and that the first measure of reform should
be the removal of the three Inneses already mentioned. . . .
There are but few missionaries [in Scotland], and of these
a large proportion are infected with Jansenism. Among the
most notorious are Alexander Drummond, who refused to
1 The next sentences (omitted in the above extract) in Lercari's report con
tain certain charges against George Innes with regard to the administration of
the property of the Scotch College.
2 The allusion is of course to the famous Scotch financier, the founder,
during the regency of Philip of Orleans, of the French National Bank, whose
subsequent collapse inflicted such unspeakable misery on the country.
412 APPENDIX.
subscribe the formulary ; Andrew Hassett and Robert Gordon,
authors of a catechism since condemned in Rome; George
Gordon, of Scalan, who has published a letter contesting the
authority of the Church ; Patrick Leith, known in Edinburgh
by the impious lectures which he has delivered against the
Apostolic decrees ; George Duncan, brought up in the sem
inary of Scalan, and taught by Innes at Paris; and John
Gordon, who refused to sign the formulary, and is now pub
lishing in Scotland an account of the pretended miracles of
Monsieur Paris.1 . . .
It is believed that he is not untainted by Jansenism, and
consequently it is not unreasonably feared that as regards doc
trine the young men will be badly educated. Mgr. Gordon,
vicar-apostolic of the Lowlands, does not fail to give grounds
for deeming that he also shares the infection. According to
report, he has led away many of the Catholics there : he has
employed on the mission disaffected ecclesiastics, without
first assuring himself of their submission to the Constitution.
He permits Catholics to read books written by Jansenists,
notwithstanding that many of the more fervent Catholics have
represented to him the evil that results from such permission :
he gives every token of partiality for the suspected clergy :
he keeps up a close correspondence with Thomas and Louis
Innes : he has constantly sent youths to the College at Paris,
although he cannot have been in ignorance of the errors
taught there : he has examined and approved of the before-
mentioned catechism, which has already been condemned in
Rome : he has opposed, more than any one else, the subscrip
tion to the formula sent from Rome; — and finally, he has
chosen for his coadjutor Mr Alexander Smith, a man much
suspected in these parts ; and fearing to find his choice
opposed, he has obtained his appointment, and consecrated
him, without any of the Catholics knowing anything about
it. ...
1 Lercari proceeds, in the passage immediately following this, to state that
the Bishop of Nicopolis (Gordon) wishes to procure help to found a seminary.
REPORT OF MGR. LERCARI, 1737. 413
I should not omit to mention that, although we have no
information of his [Bishop Smith] having joined in the ap
peal, yet it is known from other sources that during the time
of his residence in Paris he was regarded as a Jansenist, and
since his departure thence he has continued to correspond
with many of those disaffected professors who were expelled
from the Sorbonne ; so that there is assuredly ground for fear
that, were he to succeed Mgr. Gordon as vicar-apostolic, the
mission would greatly suffer. . . . For the rest, I hear that
the mission is in a very bad state, and that to make sure of
the orthodoxy of the clergy it would be very salutary to oblige
them to subscribe the formulary. I am aware that this has
been already sent to Scotland, and that up to now it has
remained unenforced, inasmuch as it was feared to excite by
such a novelty the attention of the Government, and to draw
down some persecution on the Catholics; but on the other
hand it has been represented to me that this objection was
put forward by an artifice of the Jausenists themselves. . . .
I hear further, from persons of much credit, that the division
of the mission which took place in the year 1734 has not
resulted in the advantages that were hoped for, and that all
the more fervent missionaries are now desirous of the reunion
as before.
Lastly, Mgr. Magdonol [Macdonald] has been spoken of to
me with the highest praise, as well with regard to doctrine,
as to his true zeal for religion, so that the most entire reliance
can be placed in his orthodoxy. . . .
NICCOLO LEKCAKI.
PARIS, March 4, 1737.
414 APPENDIX.
XIX. (p. 308).
EXTKACT FROM THE APOSTOLIC LETTER OF POPE LEO XIII.,
EX SUPREMO APOSTOLATUS A PICE, RESTORING THE HIER
ARCHY IN SCOTLAND, MARCH 4, 1878.1
But Pius IX., of happy memory, had exceedingly at heart
the restoration of the illustrious Scottish Church to its pristine
beauty and comeliness. For the bright example of his prede
cessors urged him on, they having, as it were, smoothed the
way for the advancement of the work. And in truth, having
on the one hand considered attentively the whole state of the
Catholic religion in Scotland, and the daily increase of the
number of the faithful, of sacred workers, churches, missions,
and religious houses, and like institutions, as well as the
sufficiency of temporal means ; on the other hand, being
aware that owing to the liberty which the renowned British
Government grants to Catholics, any impediment there might
be in the way of giving back to the Scots the ordinary rule of
bishops was lessening day by day, the said Pontiff was per
suaded that the restoration of the Episcopal Hierarchy should
be no longer deferred. Meanwhile the vicars -apostolic
themselves, and very many of the clergy and laity, men
conspicuous by noble birth and virtue, besought him earnestly
to delay no longer to satisfy their earnest wishes in this
matter. This humble request was again laid before him
when a chosen band from every rank in the said country,
having at their head our venerable brother, John Strain,
Bishop of Abila, in partilus Infidelium, and Vicar- Apostolic
of the Eastern District, came to this city to congratulate him
on the fiftieth anniversary of his episcopal consecration.
"When the matter was in this position, the said Pius IX.
intrusted it, as its importance demanded, for full discussion
to our venerable brethren, Cardinals of Holy Eoman Church
of the Congregation Propagandas Fidei, and their opinion
1 Authorised Translation (Edinburgh : Miller, 1878).
APOSTOLIC LETTER OF POPE LEO XIII., 1878. 415
confirmed him more and more in the resolution he had
formed. But whilst he rejoiced that he had come to the
completion of a work long and greatly wished for, he was
called by a just Judge to receive the crown of justice.
What, therefore, our predecessor was hindered by death
from bringing to a conclusion, God, who is plentiful in mercy,
and glorious in all His works, has granted us to effect, so that
we might, as it were, inaugurate with a happy omen our
Pontificate, which in these calamitous times we have received
with trembling. Wherefore, after having acquired a full
knowledge of the entire matter, we have willingly deemed
that what had been decreed by the lately deceased Pius IX.
should be put in execution. Therefore, raising up our eyes
to the Father of light, from whom cometh every best gift
and every perfect gift, we have invoked the aid of divine
grace, praying also for the help of the Blessed Virgin Mary,
conceived without stain ; of blessed Joseph, her spouse, and
Patron of the Universal Church; of the blessed Apostles,
Peter and Paul, of Andrew and of the other saints whom
the Scots venerate as patrons, in order that they, by their
suffrages before God, might aid us to bring the said matter to
a prosperous issue.
Having therefore premised these things, by an act of our
own will, with certain knowledge, and acting in virtue of the
apostolic authority which we possess over the whole Church,
to the greater glory of Almighty God, and the exaltation of
the Catholic faith, we ordain and decree that in the kingdom
of Scotland, according to what is prescribed by the canon
laws, the hierarchy of ordinary bishops, who shall be named
from the sees which by this our constitution we erect, shall
be revived and shall constitute an ecclesiastical province.
Moreover, we ordain that, for the present, six sees shall be
erected, and these we will to be founded : to wit, St Andrews,
with the addition of the title of Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aber
deen, Dunkeld, Whithorn or Galloway ; likewise Argyll and
the Isles.
416 APPENDIX.
i
Eecalling to mind the illustrious past in the history of the
Church of St Andrews, and taking into account the existing
capital of the said kingdom, and weighing other considerations
as well, calling up, as it were, from the grave, the said
renowned see, we cannot but raise it, or restore it, with the
addition of the title of Edinburgh, to the rank of the
metropolitan or archiepiscopal dignity, to which it had for
merly been raised by our predecessor, Sixtus IV., of venerable
memory, and assign to it, as by these presents, by virtue of
our apostolic authority, we do assign, add and give unto it
four of the above-named sees as suffragans — namely, Aber
deen, Dunkeld, Whithorn or Galloway, Argyll and the Isles.
As regards the See of Glasgow, considering the antiquity,
importance, and nobility of that city, and specially in view
of the highly flourishing state of religion therein, and the
archiepiscopal pre-eminence conferred upon it by Innocent
VIII., we have thought it altogether fitting to decree to give
to its bishop the name and insignia of an archbishop, as also,
by these presents, we give ; in such manner, however, that,
until it shall have been otherwise ordained by us or our
successors, he shall not receive, beyond the prerogative of the
name and honour, any right proper to a true archbishop and
metropolitan.1 We will, also, and ordain that the Archbishop
of Glasgow, as long as he shall be without suffragans, shall
be present with the other bishops in the provincial synod of
Scotland.
Now in the aforesaid archiepiscopal or metropolitan See of
St Andrews and Edinburgh shall be included the counties
of Edinburgh, Linlithgow, Haddington, Berwick, Selkirk,
Peebles, Eoxburgh, and the southern part of Fife, which lies
to the right of the river Eden ; also the county of Stirling,
saving the territories of Baldernock and East Kilpatrick.
In the archdiocese of Glasgow shall be included the
1 Cf. Ferraris, Prompta Sibliotheca, tit. Archiep., art. 1, sect. 4. " Dantur
archiepiscopi quidem qui proprie non sunt Metropolitan!, ex quo nulluin habent
suffraganeum."
APOSTOLIC LETTER OF POPE LEO XIII. . 1S7S. 417
counties of Lanark, Renfrew, Dumbarton, the territories of
Baldernock and East Kilpatriek, situated in the county of
Mirling, the northern portion of the county of Ayr, which
is separated from the southern portion of the same by the
Lugton Water flowing into the river Garnock ; also the islands
of Great and Little Cumbrae.
In the diocese of Aberdeen shall be contained the counties
of Aberdeen, Kincardine, Banff, Elgin or Moray, Xairn, Eoss
(except Lewis in the Hebrides), Cromarty, Sutherland, Caith
ness, the Orkney and Shetland Islands ; finally, that portion
of the county of Inverness which lies to the north of a straight
line drawn from the most northerly point of Loch Luing to
the eastern boundary of the said county of Inverness, where
the counties of Aberdeen and Banff join.
In the diocese of Duukeld shall be included the counties
of Perth. Forfar, Clackmannan, Kinross, and the northern
portion of the county of Fife lying to the left of the river
Eden ; also those portions of the county of Stirling which
are disjoined from it, and are surrounded by the counties of
Perth and Clackmannan.
The diocese of Whithorn or Galloway shall contain the
counties of Dumfries, Kirkcudbright, "Wigtown, and that
portion of Ayr which stretches southwards to the left of the
Lugton Water flowing into the river Garuock.
Finally, the diocese of Argyll and the Isles shall embrace
the county of Argyll, the islands of Bute and Arran, the
Hebrides, and the southern portion of the county of Inver
ness which stretches from Loch Luing to the eastern bound
ary of the said county, according to the line above described.
Thus, therefore, in the kingdom of Scotland, besides the
honorary archbishopric of Glasgow there shall be one only
ecclesiastical province, consisting of one archbishop or
metropolitan and four suffragan bishops,
We doubt not but that the new prelates, following in the
footsteps of their predecessors who by their virtues rendered
the Church of Scotland illustrious, will use every endeavour
VOL. IV. 2 D
418 APPENDIX.
to make the name of the Catholic religion in their country
shine with still greater brightness, and to promote the sal
vation of souls and the increase of the divine worship, in
the best manner possible. Wherefore, we from now declare
that we reserve to ourselves, and to our successors in the
Apostolic See, to divide when needful the aforesaid dioceses
into others, to increase their number, to change their boun
daries, and to freely execute whatever else may seem to us in
the Lord most conducive to the propagation of the orthodox
faith in the same.
And as we see clearly that it will be of great benefit to
the said churches, we will and ordain that their prelates
shall never fail to transmit to our Congregation cle Propa
ganda Fide, which hitherto has bestowed special and assiduous
care upon the said region, reports upon their sees and flocks
committed to their care; and shall inform us through the
said Congregation concerning whatever they may deem it
necessary or useful to decree in fulfilment of their pastoral
duty, and for the increase of their churches. Let them
remember, moreover, that they are bound to send in this
report, as well as to visit the tombs of the holy apostles,
every four years, as is enacted in the constitution of Sixtus V.,
of sacred memory, dated 20th December 1585, beginning
Romanus Pontifex. In all other matters, likewise, which
belong to the same pastoral office, the above-named arch
bishops and bishops shall enjoy all the rights and faculties
which the Catholic bishops of other nations do enjoy or can
now or hereafter enjoy; and shall be bound by the same
obligations which, through the same common and general
discipline of the Catholic Church, bind other bishops. What
ever, therefore, either owing to the ancient state of the
churches of Scotland, or to the subsequent condition of the
missions by special constitutions or privileges or particular
customs, may have been in force, now that the circumstances
are changed, shall not henceforward have any power to con
vey any right or to impose any obligation. And for this
APOSTOLIC LETTER OF POPE LEO XIII. , 1878. 419
end, in order that no doubt may arise in future on this
head, we, by the plenitude of our apostolical authority, de
prive the said special statutes, ordinances, and privileges of
whatever kind, and customs, at however a remote or im
memorial time they may have been introduced, and are now
in force, of all power of inducing any obligation or conveying
any right.
Wherefore it shall be in the power of the Scottish prelates
to decree whatever is requisite for the execution of the com
mon law, and whatever is competent to the episcopal authority
according to the common discipline of the Church, let them
feel assured that we shall willingly lend them the aid of our
apostolic authority in whatever may seem conducive towards
increasing the glory of God's name and helping on the spiritual
welfare of souls. And as an earnest of our goodwill towards
the beloved daughter of the Holy See, the Church of Scotland,
we will and declare that the bishops, when they have been
invested with the name and rights of ordinary bishops, must
by no means be deprived of those advantages and more ample
faculties which they formerly enjoyed along with the title of
vicars of ourselves and the Holy See. For it is not right that
they should suffer any loss from what, in compliance with the
wishes of the Scottish Catholics, has been decreed by us for
the greater good of religion in their country. And whereas
the condition of Scotland is such that adequate means for the
support of the clergy and the various needs of each church
are wanting, we have a certain hope that our beloved sons in
Christ, to whose earnest wish for the restoration of the Epis
copal Hierarchy we have acceded, will continue to aid those
pastors whom we shall place over them with still more ample
alms and offerings, whereby they may be able to provide for
the restoration of the episcopal sees, the splendour of the
churches and of the divine worship, the support of the clergy
and the poor, and the other needs of the Church.
But now we turn with most humble prayer to Him in
whom it hath pleased God the Father in the dispensation of
420 APPENDIX.
the fulness of time to restore all things, beseeching Him
o * O
who has begun the good work to perfect it, confirm it, and
strengthen it, and to give, to all those whose duty it is to
execute the things which we have decreed, the light and
strength of heavenly grace, so that the Episcopal Hierarchy
restored by us in the kingdom of Scotland may be for the
greater good of Catholic religion. For this end, also, we
invoke as intercessors with our Saviour Jesus Christ, His
most blessed Mother, blessed Joseph His reputed father,
the blessed apostles Peter and Paul; likewise St Andrew,
whom Scotland venerates with special devotion, and the rest
of the saints, and especially St Margaret, Queen of Scotland,
the glory and pillar of the kingdom, that they may benig-
nantly favour that Church now rising again fronf its ashes.
Finally, we decree this our letter can never at any time be
charged with the fault termed sulrcptio obreptio,1 or with any
defect of our intention, or with any other defect, but shall
always be held valid and firm, and shall obtain effect in all
things, and shall be inviolably observed. Notwithstanding
apostolic edicts and general or special sanctions published in
synodal, provincial, and universal councils, and notwithstand
ing the rights and privileges of the ancient sees of Scotland,
and of the missions and apostolic vicariates afterwards con
stituted therein, and notwithstanding the rights and privi
leges of all churches or pious institutes whatsoever, even
although ratified by oath, or by apostolic or any other con
firmation, and all things to the contrary notwithstanding,
we expressly abrogate all these things in so far as they con
tradict the foregoing, although for their abrogation they would
require special mention, or any other formality, however par
ticular. We decree, moreover, that whatever be done to the
contrary knowingly or ignorantly by any person in the name
1 Subreptio or obrcptio. These are legal terms for which there are no adequate
words to give their exact meaning, which is, taking away craftily, little by
little, or adding anything in the same way.— [Note by Translator of the
Papal letter.]
APOSTOLIC LETTER OF POPE LEO XIII. , 1878. 421
of any authority whatsoever, shall be null and void. We will
also that copies, even printed, of this letter, when subscribed
by a public notary, and stamped with the seal of an ecclesi
astical dignitary, shall have the same credit as would be given
to the expression of our will by the exhibition of this diploma
itself.
Let no man, therefore, dare to infringe or rashly gainsay
this page of our erection, constitution, restoration, institution,
assignation, addition, attribution, decree, mandate, and will.
If any one should presume to attempt this, let him know
that he shall incur indignation of Almighty God, and of His
blessed apostles Peter and Paul.
Given at Rome, at St Peter's, in the year of the Lord's
Incarnation one thousand eight hundred and seventy-seven,
the fourth of the nones of March l [4th March 1878], in the
first year of our Pontificate.
F. CAKDINAL ASQUINT.
C. CAEDINAL SACCONI, Pro-Datarius.
Visa de Curia J. de Aquila e Vicecomitibus. Keg. in Secre-
taria Brevium.
1 In the expedition of bulls, the Pontifical Datary employs the Florentine
mode of reckoning (calculus Florentinus) , according to which the year com
mences, not on January 1, but on the following 25th of March.
422
APPENDIX.
XX.
BISHOPS IN SCOTLAND, FROM 1695 TO 1890.
[From 1653, when the Scottish clergy were incorporated
into a missionary body by decree of Propaganda, until 1695,
the Catholics of Scotland were governed by the following
Prefects - Apostolic : WILLIAM BALLANTYNE (or Bcllenden),
1653-61 ; ALEXANDER WINSTER (or Duribar], 1662 - 68,
1672-94; JOHN WALKER (or Boss), 1668-71.]
NAME.
TITLE.
CONSECRATED.
DIED.
I.— VICARS-APOSTOLIC, 1695-1731.
1. Thomas Nicolson
Peristacluum . Feb. 27, 1695
Oct. 23, 1718
2. James Gordon .
Nicopolis .
April 11, 1706
March 1, 1746
3. John Wallace, Coadj.
Cyrrha
Oct. 2, 1720
July 11, 1733
II.— LOWLAND DISTRICT, 1731-1827.
James Gordon ...
4. Alexander Smith
Misinopolis . Nov. 13, 1735
Aug. 21, 1767
5. James Grant
Sinita . . . Nov. 13, 1755
Dec. 3, 1778
6. George Hay
Daulis . . May 21, 1769
Oct. 15, 1811
7. John Geddes, Coadj.
Morocco . . Nov. 30, 1780
Feb. 11, 1799
8. Alexander Cameron .
Maximianopolis . i Oct. 28, 1798
Feb. 7, 1828
HIGHLAND DISTRICT, 1731-1827.
9. Hugh Macdonald
Diana .
Oct. 2, 1731
March 12, 1773
10. John Macdonald
Tiberiopolis
Sept. 27, 1761
May 9, 1779
11. Alexander Macdonald
Polemo
March 12, 1780
Sept. 9, 1791
12. John Chisholm .
Oria .
Feb. 12, 1792
July 8, 1814
13. ^Eneas Chisholm
Diocsesarea .
Sept. 15, 1805
July 31, 1818
14. Ranald Macdonald .
Aeryndela .
Feb. 25, 1820
Sept. 20, 1832
BISHOPS IN SCOTLAND, FROM 1695 TO 1890. 423
NAME.
TITLE. CONSECRATED.
DIED.
HI.— WESTERN DISTRICT, 1828-1878.
Eanald Macdonald .
15. Andrew Scott .
Eretria
Sept. 21, 1828
Dec. 4. 1846
16. John Murdoch .
Castabala .
Oct. 20, 1833
Dec. 15, 1865
17. Alexander Smith, Coadj. .
Pariura
Oct. 3, 1847
June 15, 1861
18. John Gray
Hypsopolis .
Oct. 19, 1862
Jan. 14, 1872
19. James Lynch, Coadj.
Arcadiopolis
Kildare & Leigli-
Nov. 4, 1866
April 4, 1869
Trans, to Kild.
and Leigh.
lin, Coadj.
20. Charles Eyre, Arclibp.
Anazarba .
Glasgow . . ,
Jan. 31, 1869
March 15, 1878
Translated to
Glasgow.
EASTERN DISTRICT, 1828-1878.
21. Alexander Paterson .
Cybistra . . Aug. 15, 1816
Oct. 30, 1831
22. Andrew Carruthers .
C'eramis . . Jan. 13, 1833
May 24, 1852
23. James Gillis
Limyra . . ! July 22, 1838
Feb. 24, 1864
24. John Strain
Abila . . . ' Sept. 25, 1864
St Andrews and March 15, 1878
Translated to
St Andrews
Edinburgh
& Edinburgh.
NORTHERN DISTRICT, 1828-1878.
25. James Kyle . . . Germanicia . . | Sept. 28, 1828 Feb. 23, 1869
26. John Macdonald . . Nicopolis . . : Feb. 24, 1869 ! Translated to
Aberdeen . . March 15, 1878 , Aberdeen
IV.— HIERARCHY EESTORED, MARCH 4, 1878.
John Strain, Archbp.
St Andrews and
Translated from
July 2, 1883
Edinburgh
Abila
CHARLES EYRE, Arclibp. .
Glasgow
Translated from
Anazarba
27. WILLIAM SMITH, Archbp. '
St Andrews and
Oct. 28, 1885
Edinburgh
John Macdonald
Aberdeen .
Translated from
Feb. 4, 1889
Nicopolis
28. ANGUS MACDONALD .
Argyll & the Isles
May 23, 1878
29. JOHN MACLACHLAN .
Galloway .
May 23, 1878
30. George Rigg
Dunkeld
May 26, 1878
Jan. 18, 1887
31. Colin Grant
Aberdeen .
Aug. 13, 1889
Sept. 26, 1889
32. HUGH MACDONALD, C. SS.R.
Do.
Oct. 23, 1890
33. JAMES SMITH .
Dunkeld
Oct. 28, 1890
424 APPENDIX.
XXI.
LIST OF THE RELIGIOUS HOUSES ix SCOTLAND
BEFOKE THE REFOKMATIOX.
1. CANONS OF ST AUGUSTINE (Black Canons).
Abbeys (5). — Cambuskenneth, Holyrood, Inchaffray, Jedburgh,
Scone.
Priories (22). — Abemethy, Blantyre, Canonby, Colonsay,
Crusay, Inchkenneth, Inchmahome, Isle of May, Lochleven, Loch
Tay, Monymusk, Oransay, Pittenweem, Portmoke, Eestinot,
Roseneath, Rothesay, Rowadil, St Andrews (Cathedral Priory),
St Mary's Isle, Scarinch, Strathfillan.
2. BENEDICTINES (Black Monks).
Abbeys (6). — Arbroath, Dunfermline, Kelso, Kilwinning, Lin-
dores, Old Melrose.
Priories (5). — Coldingham, Fyvie, Lesmahagow, Tyninghame,
Urquhart.
(Cluniacs.} Abbeys (3). — Paisley, Crossraguel, lona (held with
the Bishopric of the Isles).
Priory. — Fail. 1
3. CARMELITES (White Friars).— Aberdeen, Banff, Berwick, Dunbar,
Edinburgh, Inverberry, Irwyn, Linlithgow, Lufness, Queensferry,
Roxburgh, Tylilum.
4. CARTHUSIANS. — Mackerstone, Perth.
5. CISTERCIANS (White Monks).
Abbeys (11). — Balmerino, Culross, Cupar, Deer, Dundrennan,
Glenluce, Kinloss, Melrose, Newbotle, Sweetheart, Sandale.
Priories (3). — Friar's Carse, Hassingdean, Mauchline.
6. DOMINICANS (Black, or Preaching Friars). — Aberdeen, Ayr, Berwick,
Cupar-Fife, Dundee, Dysart, Edinburgh, Elgin, Glasgow, Had-
dington, Inverness, Linlithgow, Montrose, Perth, St Andrews,
St Monan's (Fife), St Ninian's (Stirling), Wigtown.
7. FRANCISCANS (Grey Friars or Minorites).
(a) Conve-ntuals, — Berwick, Douglas, Dumfries, Dundee, Had-
dington, Innerkeithing, Roxburgh.
(b) Observants. — Aberdeen, Aberdour, Ayr, Banff, Edinburgh,
Elgin, Glasgow, Jedburgh, Kirkcudbright, Lanark, Perth, St
Andrews, Stirling.
1 Included by most writers among the Cluniac Houses ; but Chalmers is
probably right in stating that the only monastery at Fail was the Trinitarian
(red) Friary founded by Andrew Bruce in 1252.— TRANSLATOR.
THE RELIGIOUS HOUSES IN SCOTLAND. 425
8. GILBERTINES. — Dullmullen (afterwards Cluniac).
9. HOSPITALLERS OF ST ANTHONY. — Leith.
10. KNIGHTS HOSPITALLERS OF ST JOHN.- — Ancrum, St John's Hill
(Edinburgh), Kinkell, Eothwell, Torphichen.
11. KNIGHTS TEMPLARS. — Aberdeen, Aboyne, Adamton, Ballantradoch
(now Arniston), Edinburgh, Inchinnan (Eenfrew), Maryculter,
Oggerstone, St Germans, Temple (011 the South Esk), Tulloch,
Turriff.
12. PREMONSTRATENSIANS (White Canons).
Abbeys (5). — Dryburgh, Feme, Holywood, Soulseat, Tongland.
Cathedral Priory. — Whithorn.
13. TRINITARIANS (Mathurin or Red Friars). — Aberdeen, Berwick,
Brechin, Cromarty, Dornoch, Dunbar, Dundee, Dunet, Fail,
Houstoun, Lufness, Peebles, Scotland's Well (Lochleven).
14. VALLISCAULIANS.
Abbeys (2). — Ardchattan, Pluscardine (afterwards Benedictine).
Priory. — Beauly.
CONVENTS OF NUNS.
1. CANONESSES OF ST AUGUSTINE. — lona.
2. BENEDICTINES. — Coldingham, Kilconquhar, Lincluden, North Ber
wick.
3. CARMELITES. — Edinburgh, Maxwell.
4. CISTERCIANS. — Coldstream, Edinburgh, Eccles (Berwick), Elbotle
(Haddington), Elquho (Strathearne), Manuel (Linlithgow),
Gulyne (Dirlton), Haddington, Halystan (Berwick), Perth, St
Bothans (Lammermoor), South Berwick, Trefontanes (Lammer-
moor).
5. DOMINICANESSES. — Edinburgh.
6. FRANCISCANS. — Aberdeen, Aberdour, Dundee.
7. GILBERTINES. — Dullmullen (the nuns followed the Benedictine
Rule).1
1 The above catalogue is compiled chiefly from Walcott (Ancient Church of
Scotland), with amendments and additions. The list given by Spottiswoode
is much less complete. — TRANSLATOR.
426
APPENDIX.
XXII.
STATISTICS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1890.
DIOCESE.
Catholic
Popula
tion.
Churches,
Chapels,
and
Stations.
Priests.
Elemen
tary
Schools.
Orders of Men.
Orders of Women.
Secular.
Regular.
ST ANDREWS
AND EDIN
BURGH.
52,000
68
50
11
38
Jesuits, Ob-
latesof Mary
Immaculate.
Franciscans, Little
Sisters of the
Poor, Sisters of
Mercy, Ursulines
of Jesus, Sisters
of the Immacu
late Conception.
GLASGOW . .
220,000
106
121
27
198
Franciscans,
Jesuits, Pas-
sionists, Laz-
arists, Marist
Brothers.
Franciscans, Sis
ters of the Good
Shepherd, Little
Sisters of the
Poor, Sisters of
Mercy, Sisters of
Charity, Faith
ful Companions
of Jesus.
ABERDEEN .
11,749
54
41
14
21
Benedictines.
Franciscans, Poor
Sisters of Naz
areth, Sisters of
Mercy.
DUNKELD .
25,894
29
27
7
27
Redemptor-
ists, Marist
Little Sisters of
the Poor, Sisters
Brothers.
of Mercy,' Ursu
lines of Jesus.
GALLOWAY .
17,000
38
24
2
24
Premonstrat-
ensians, Mar
Benedictines, Fran
ciscans, Sisters
ist Brothers.
of Mercy, Sisters
of St Joseph.
ARGYLL AND
THE ISLES.
12,000
37
26
8
Servants of the
Sacred Heart.
TOTAL, .
338,643
332
289
61
316
INDEX.
AARON of Caerlyon, early British
martyr, i. 4.
Abbot of lona, his position, i. 94.
Abbots, succession of, in the Irish
monasteries, i. 50.
Abel, Bishop of St Andrews, i. 370.
Abercorn, Earl of, conversion of the
sons and daughter of the, iv. 79.
Abercorn, treatment of the Mar
chioness of, iv. 15.
Abercromby, Robert, S.J., iii. 341 —
converts Queen Anne of Denmark,
347 — sentence passed on, 350 — his
death, 351 — his narrative of Queen
Anne's conversion, 451.
Aberdeen, foundation of bishopric of,
i. 291 — Trinitarian house at, 332 —
provincial council held at, ii. 28 —
Franciscan convent at, 98 — founda
tion of university of, 198— disorders
in the diocese of, 239 — breviary of,
128, 407 — collegiate churches
founded at, 415— hospitals at, 417
— succession of bishops of, 425 — the
Reformation and the university of,
iii. 204 — the General Assembly at,
400 — destruction of Catholic monu
ments at, iv. 30 — abolition of
Christmas and Easter at, 32 — a
stronghold of Catholicism, 113 —
anti - Catholic demonstrations at,
138 note — dispersion of "Popish
meeting " at, 142 — restoration of
the see of, 310, 416 — its extent,
417.
Abernethy, first foundation of, i. 26
— second, 82, 83 — seat of the
primacy, 216.
Abernethy, Mr, his dispute with
Bishop Hay on miracles, iv. 224.
Aboyne, Charles, Earl of, unsuccess
ful attempts to pervert, iv. 347.
Acca, Bishop of Galloway, i. 12.
Acca, Bishop of Hexham, i. 17 1, 172.
Ada de Warenne, wife of Prince Henry
of Scotland, i. 308.
Adam, Bishop of Brechin, ii. 24.
Adam, Bishop of Caithness, murder
of, ii. 259.
Adamnan, his portrait of St Columba,
i. 89 — Abbot of lona, 143 — con
verted to the Roman rite, 145 —
attends the Synod of Tara, ib. — his
Lex Innocentlum, ib. — death of, 146
— his foundations, ib. — ancient copy
of his life of St Columba, ii. 360.
Adamson, John, provincial of the
Dominicans, ii. 129.
Adamson, Patrick, Protestant Arch
bishop of St Andrews, iii. 242, 278,
358.
Aelred, St, biographer of St Ninian,
i. 5— on King David I., 290.
Agatha of Hungary, mother of St
Margaret, i. 240.
Aidan, King of Dalriada, crowned by
St Columba, i. 74.
Aidan, St, sent from lona to North-
umbria, i. 116 — Bishop of Lindis-
farne, 118 — his foundations, 121 —
his death, ib.
Airth, William, preacher, ii. 150.
428
INDEX.
Alan of Galloway, i. 340.
Alban, kingdom of, i. 220.
Alban, St, martyred under Diocletian,
i. 4.
Albany, Alexander, Duke of, ii. 101 —
regency of, 103, 118-130.
Albany, Robert, Duke of, ii. 33 — ap
pointed regent, 44 — his religious
policy, 54.
Albert of Austria, Archduke, bene
factor of Scotch College, Douai, iii.
390.
Alcuin, letter of, to the brethren at
Whithorn, i. 5.
Aless, Alexander, Protestant theo
logian, ii. 145, 146.
Alexander, Bishop of Moray, ii. 41.
Alexander I., King of Scotland, i. 271
— new sees founded by, 284 — intro
duces religious orders, 285 — his
death, 286.
Alexander II., King, i. 339 — religious
foundations under, 356 — his love
for the Dominicans, 357 — his death,
361.
Alexander III, King, i. 339, 361 —
religious foundations under, 369 —
his marriage and death, 372.
Alexander III., Pope, on the claims
of York, i. 321 — excommunicates
William the Lion, 326.
Alexander VII., Pope, iv. 40 — mis
sion from King Charles II. to, 95
— his reply to the king's proposals,
102 — his formula against Jan
senism, 252.
Allen, Cardinal, iii. 153 — supports the
proposed Spanish expedition, 276 —
letters from Queen Mary to, 280 —
his eulogy of Bishop Leslie, 325 —
his view of Queen Elizabeth's char
acter, 372.
Alwyn, Bishop of St Andrews, i. 233.
America, emigration of Highland
Catholics to, iv. 219, 272.
Anastasius IV., Pope, subjects the
sees of Orkney and the Isles to
Drontheim, i. 307.
Anderson, Alexander, principal of
King's College, Aberdeen, ii. 13, 14
— refuses to conform to Protestant
ism, 204.
Anderson, Patrick, S.J., rector of the
Scotch College, Rome, iii. 387, 411
— imprisoned, 411 — his death, 412.
Andrew, St, devotion to, at Hexham,
i. 171, 197 — his relics brought to
Scotland, 192.
Angus the Culdee, litany of, i. 36 —
on St Columba, 62 — on St Donnan,
113.
Angus, Archibald, sixth Earl of, ii.
104, 105 — marries the queen-
dowager, 106.
Angus, William, tenth Earl of, con
forms to Protestantism, iii. 354 —
again professes himself Catholic, ib.
— exiled for the faith, 403 — his son
to be educated a Protestant, iv. 16
—persecuted by the Kirk, 35.
Annabella, Queen to Robert III., ii. 33.
Anne of Denmark, Queen to James
VI., iii. 346 — conversion of, 347 —
her firmness in the faith, 348 —
letter of Clement VIII. to, 394, 473
— documents relating to her con
version, 450-455.
Anne, Queen, accession of, iv. 156 —
condition of Scottish Catholics
under, 158, 159 — her proclamation
against Catholics, 161 — church pa
tronage restored under, 321.
Annuity-tax imposed upon Catholics,
iv. 278 — abolition of the, 279, 325.
Anselm, St, censures Irish customs,
i. 103 — his letter to Count Haco,
265— on the claims of York, 273—
his death, 277.
Anti-pope, Scotland and the, i. 297,
ii. 45, 60 — Scotch cardinal ap
pointed by the, 40.
Applecross, church of, i. 142, 208.
Aquhorties, seminary founded at, iv.
223— death of Bishop Hay at, 271
— transferred to Blairs, 281.
Arbroath, foundation of abbey at, i.
325— David Beaton commendator
of, ii. 152.
Arbuthnot, Benedict, last abbot of
Ratisbon, iv. 288 note.
Arbuthnott, missal of, ii. 406.
Architecture, character of Irish mon
astic, ii. 350 — Celtic church, 351-
356 — Scotch medieval, 387.
Arculphus of Gaul visits lona, i. 144.
Ardchattan, monastery of, i. 356.
IXDEX.
429
Argyle, Archibald, fifth Earl of, his
ex-Carmelite chaplain, ii. 230, 233,
234 — openly professes Protestant
ism, 269 — usurps the temporalities
of Brechin, iii. 91.
Argyle, Countess of, represents Queen
Elizabeth at baptism of James VI. ,
iii. 104 — penance imposed on her,
ib., 158 note.
Argyle, John, Duke of, on lona, i. 65
— on Scotch Episcopalianism, iv.
317.
Argyle, see of, its erection, i. 337 —
succession of bishops, ii. 425 — the
bishopric restored, iv. 410, 416 —
its extent, 417.
Armagh, subjection of lona to the
Abbot of, i. 218 — Archbishop of,
claims primacy of Scotland, iv. 66
— Hebridean mission intrusted to
him, 86.
Arnold, Abbot of Kelso, Bishop of St
Andrews, i. 315.
Arran, Earl of, Regent of Scotland, ii.
161 — favours the Reformation, ib.
— created Duke of Chatelherault,
193 — unites himself to the Con
gregation, 276 — intrigues against
Queen Mary, iii. 85.
Art in medieval Scotland, ii. 347.
Articles of the faith, as defined in
1559, ii. 421.
Articles, book of, produced at the
Westminster Conference, iii. 190
—the five (of Perth), 382, 385.
Articles, Lords of the, instituted by
James I., ii. 48.
Assembly, General, meetings of the,
iii. 11, 15, 29, 31, 78, 87, 140, 141,
158, 203, 221, 316, 362— prohibited
by James VI., 376— restoration of
the episcopate sanctioned by the,
380 — anti-Catholic enactments of
the, 400 — abolishes episcopacy, iv.
6 — iconoclastic zeal of the, 30, 63
— forcibly dissolved by Cromwell,
86 — protests against Catholic relief,
234.
Augustinians. See Canons-regular.
Aynslie bond, the, iii. 119, 179.
Ayr, Franciscan convent at, ii. 98.
BABINGTON PLOT, origin of the, iii. 291
— extent of Queen Mary's com
plicity in it, 297.
Badenoch, Wolf of, ii. 29, 41.
Badulf (Beadwulf), last Anglo-Saxon
Bishop of Galloway, i. 13, 172.
Bagnall, Mr, attack of Glasgow Pro
testants on, iv. 235.
Baithene, Abbot of lona, i. 106, 110.
Baldred of the Bass, St, i. 173.
Balfour, Sir James, commissary for
ecclesiastical causes, iii. 108 — com
mandant of Edinburgh Castle, 136
— sells himself to Moray, 159 — his
death, 264 — "the most corrupt man
of his age," 265.
Baliol, John, claimant to the Scottish
crown, ii. 2, 6 — his coronation, 6 —
deposed and banished, 8.
Ballantyne (Bellenden), William, pre
fect-apostolic of Scotland, iv. 41 —
his early life and conversion, 43 —
appointed prefect, 44 — his labours
in Scotland, 45 — imprisoned in Lon
don, ib. — his death, 46.
Ballard, accomplice in the Babington
plot, iii. 296, 300.
Balmerino, Cistercian monastery of, i.
356 — sacked by the Reformers, ii.
271.
Balmyle, Nicholas de, Bishop of Dun
blane, ii. 24.
Balnaves, Henry, assistant - commis
sioner at the York Conference, iii.
172.
Bancroft, Richard, his sermon against
Calvinism, iii. 359.
Bangor (Ireland), monastery at, i. 43.
Bannockburn, battle of, ii. 12 — the
Abbot of Inchaffray at, 25.
Banns, compulsory publication of, iv.
279— abolished in 1878, ib. — effect
of the measure, 280.
Baptism, question of the validity of
Catholic, iii. 87, 267 — of children
of Protestants, on what conditions
allowed, iv. 172.
Bar, St, i. 292.
Barberini, Cardinal Francis, his letter
on the marriage of Charles, Prince
of Wales, iii. 488— letter of Hen
rietta Maria to, 493 — named Pro
tector of Scotland, iv. 38 — faculties
granted to, ib.
430
INDEX.
Barberini, Cardinal Maffeo, Protector
of Scotland, iii. 387.
Barberini Library, report on the Scot
tish mission preserved in the, iv. 47.
Barbour, John, ii. 41.
Barclay, William, professor and
writer, iii. 334.
Bards, privileges of ancient Irish, i.
76.
Barlow, chaplain to Henry VIII.,
envoy to Scotland, ii. 140.
Barra, Catholic school at (1675), iv.
119 — visit of Bishop Nicolson to,
152 — almost entirely Catholic, 163
— Nicolson's account of, 372.
Bartholomew, Massacre of St, iii.
226.
Basillkon Doron, publication of the,
iii. 363 — contemporary criticism of
the, 364 — the Scotch Reformation
depicted in the, 365.
Basle, Scotch prelates at the Council
of, ii. 52, 79.
Bassandine, Thomas, suppression of
work printed by, iii. 203.
Bassoll, John, O.S.F., ii. 337-
Bavaria, Duke of, obtains the release
of Bishop Nicolson, iv. 147 — sec
ularisation of the Scotch abbey at
Ratisbon by the Government of,
288-290.
Beaton, David, birth and education
of, ii. 151 — envoy to France, ib. —
made Lord Privy Seal, 152 — Bishop
of Mirepoix, 153 — becomes cardinal,
154 — Archbishop of St Andrews,
ib. — his proceedings against here
tics, 158 — his imprisonment, 161
— his energetic policy, 164 — ap
pointed papal legate, 165 — con
spiracy against him, 166 — his
assassination, 176 — sketch of his
character, ib. — extant portraits of
him, 178.
Beaton, James, Archbishop of Glas
gow, ii. 131 — translated to St An
drews, 133 — his vigour in defend
ing the faith, 136— his death, 154.
Beaton, James (II.), Archbishop of
Glasgow, ii. 195 — ambassador in
France, iii. 57 — letter from Queen
Mary to, 111 — reports suspicions
attaching to her, 116 — declared an
outlaw, 231 — his correspondence
with Pope Gregory XIII. , 239 —
attends the deathbed of Lennox,
272 — imposed on by Elizabeth's
agent, 283 — favoured by James
VI., 313, 327— his death, 327—
his benefactions to the Scotch Col
lege, Paris, 328.
Beaton, John, assists Queen Mary's
escape from Lochleven, iii. 161.
Beaulieu, monastery of, i. 356 — re
stored by Bishop Reid, ii. 196 note.
Beaumont, French ambassador, on
the conversion of Queen Anne of
Denmark, iii. 348.
Bede, Venerable, his account of St
Ninian, i. 5, 8 — his life of St
Cuthbert, 157 et seq. — on the
decline of the Northumbrian
Church, 195.
Bell, Dean of Dunkeld, ii. 30.
Bellenden, John, Archdeacon of
Moray, ii. 142.
Bellenden, William. See Ballantyne.
Bellings, Sir John, sent by Charles
II. to Rome, iv. 95.
Bells, Celtic, preserved, ii. 363.
Beltancourt, French ambassador to
Scotland, ii. 262.
Bene, Bishop of St Andrews, ii. 23 —
his flight and death, 30.
Benedict XIII. (anti-pope), ii. 40,
41 — confirms foundation of St
Andrews University, 58 — conse
crates Scotch bishops, 41, 68.
Benedict XIII., Pope, approves divi
sion of Scotland into two vicariates,
iv. 187.
Benedict XIV., Pope, on Queen
Mary's claim to title of martyr,
iii. 308 — his efforts for the perse
cuted Scottish Catholics, iv. 192
— interview of Lord Andrew Gor
don with, 193 note.
Benedict Henry. See York, Car
dinal of.
Benedictines, introduced into Scot
land, i. 301 — on the Scottish mis
sion, iii. 392 — at Fort -Augustus,
iv. 336 — their former houses in
Scotland, 424 — convents of, 425.
Benefices, hereditary succession to, i.
233.
INDEX.
431
Benham, Hugo, Bishop of Aberdeen,
ii. 334.
Berchan, St, on the death of King
Constantine, i. 221 — on Malcolm
Canmore, 260.
Bernard, Bishop of Man, ii. 31.
Bernard of Clairvaux, St, his account
of the Irish monasteries, i. 43 — on
abuses in the Irish Church, 235 —
hia description of Prince Henry of
Scotland, 309.
Bernham, David of, Bishop of St
Andrews, i. 352, 358.
Berulle, Oratorian Father, iii. 429 ;
iv. 51.
Berwick, convent at, i. 303 — diocesan
synod at, 308 — sack of, ii. 7 —
treaty of, 282.
Bestiaries, spiritualised natural his
tories, ii. 381.
Beveridge, burned for heresy at Edin
burgh, ii. 144.
Beza, communication from Scottish
Protestants to, iii. 103 — his treatise
on the episcopate, 243.
Biggar, collegiate church at, ii. 183,
416.
Birkhead, George, appointed arch-
priest for England, iii. 422 — his
death, ib.
Birsay, church of, i. 263 — relics of
St Magnus at, 265 — antiquarian
discoveries at, ii. 363.
Bishop, William, first English vicar-
apostolic, iii. 433 — his consecra
tion, 434 — advice of the French
nuncio to, 435 — erects chapter in
England, 436 — petitions for release
from the care of the Scottish
Church, 437 — his letter on the
marriage of Charles, Prince of
Wales, 486 — text of the nuncio's
instructions to, 494.
Bishops, succession of Scottish, ii.
424 — since the Reformation, iv.
422, 423.
Black, David, violent sermon preached
by, iii. 360.
Black, John, Dominican friar, iii. 35
— murdered at Holyrood, 97.
Blackadder, Archbishop of Glasgow,
ii. 115.
Blackness, imprisonment of ministers
at, iii. 377— Father Stephen Max
well confined at, iv. 127.
Blackwell, George, arch-priest, sub
jection of the Scotch clergy to, iii.
386 — opposes the Pope's views, 421
— his deposition, 422.
Blackwood, Adam, Scottish writer,
iii. 333.
Blair, John, O.S.B., chaplain and
biographer of William Wallace, ii.
337.
Blairs, Cardinal Beaton's portrait at,
ii. 179 — foundation of seminary at,
iv. 281 — books from the Scotch
College, Paris, transferred to,
287.
Blakhal, Gilbert, missionary in Scot
land, iv. 51.
Blathmac, martyred Abbot of lona,
i. 213.
Boece, Arthur, ii. 129, 341.
Boece, Hector, first principal of Aber
deen University, ii. 129, 341.
Boiamund, the roll of, i. 368.
Boisil, Prior, receives St Cuthbert at
Melrose, i. 159 — dies of the yellow
plague, 162.
Bondington, William de, Bishop of
Glasgow, i. 358.
Bonfrere, Father, rector of the Scotch
College, Douai, iv. 220.
Boniface, St, legend of, i. 177.
Boniface VIII., Pope, ii. 9, 21.
Boniface IX., Pope, ii. 40.
Borthwick, Sir John, tried for heresy,
ii. 159, 160.
Bothwell, defeat of the Covenanters
at, iv. 108.
Bothwell, Adam, bishop-elect of Ork
ney, ii. 199 — conforms to Protes
tantism, ib., iii. 89 — marries Queen
Mary to Bothwell, 132 — deposed
by the Assembly in consequence,
129 note, 158 — anoints James VI.
at his coronation, 147 — one of
Moray's commissioners at York,
171 — reinstated in the ministry,
203.
Bothwell, James, fourth Earl of, con
spires to murder Darnley, iii. 112
— carries off Queen Mary, 120 —
his treatment of her, 121 — extorts
her consent to marry him, 125 —
432
INDEX.
divorces his wife, 126 — created
Duke of Orkney, 132 — his mar
riage to Mary, ib. — confederation
of nobles against, 134 — his rela
tions with Mary, 1 35 — at Carberry
Hill, 136— his flight, 148— impris
oned in Denmark, ib. — his death, ib.
Bourbon, royal family of, in Edin
burgh, iv. 282.
Bourignon, Antoinette de, erroneous
doctrines of, iv. 169, 200.
Bower, Walter, Abbot of Inchcolm,
1. 286 ; ii. 338.
Bowes, Marjory, John Knox's first
wife, ii. 223.
Boyne, battle of the, iv. 137.
Brady, Patrick, Franciscan mission
ary in Scotland, iv. 66 — his report
to Propaganda, 68.
Braemar, Bishop Nicolson at, iv. 177
— labours of Father Gordon, S.J.,
at, 402.
Braunsberg, death of Father Aber-
cromby, S.J., at, iii. 351 — Scotch
students at, 352, 455.
Breasal, Abbot of lona, i. 209.
Brecbennoch, the, ii. 370.
Brechin, foundation of, i. 225 — bish
opric of, 303 — Bishop of, envoy
to England, ii. 3 — Baliol degraded
at, 8 — succession of bishops of,
425.
Breda, King Charles II. at, iv. 91 —
the Declaration of, 94.
Breviary, the Aberdeen, ii. 407.
Bricius, Bishop of Moray, i. 284, 338,
339, 358.
Bridget, St, church at Abernethy
dedicated to, i. 26 — her prophecy
to King Nectan, 27.
Brigham, Treaty of, ii. 5.
Britain, introduction of Christianity
into, i. 1 — Roman Christians in,
2, 3 — early martyrs of, 4.
Broun, Gilbert, Abbot of New Abbey,
iii. 235 — his zeal for the faith, 405
— apprehended and banished, 406.
Brown, John, Friar Minim, iii. 332,
333.
Bruce, Robert, his claim to the crown
of Scotland, ii. 3 — crowned at
Scone, 12 — twice excommunicated,
12, 14— his death, 15.
Brude, King, converted by St Col-
umba, i. 66 — grants Lochleven to
the Keledei, 190.
Bunmargy, Franciscan convent of,
Highland converts at the, iv. 71.
CADOME, home for Scottish priests at,
iv. 130, 131 note, 362.
Cadroe, St, i. 218, 229.
Cainmach, St, companion of St Col-
umba, i. 83.
Cairnech, St, the first Irish martyr, i.
38.
Caithness, united to Scotland, i. 231
— foundation of see of, 292 — mur
der of the Bishop of, 359 — succes
sion of bishops of, ii. 426.
Calixtus II., Pope, on the see of
Orkney, i. 266, 267 — on the claims
of York, 283, 289.
Calixtus III., Pope, ii. 80.
Calvin, intimacy of Knox with, ii.
222 — influence of, iii. 10 — modifi
cation of his system, iv. 328.
Cambuskenneth, destruction of the
abbey of, ii. 273.
Cameron, John, Bishop of Glasgow,
ii. 52, 54.
Cameron, Alexander, coadjutor to
Bishop Hay, iv. 261.
Cameron, Alexander, S.J., missionary
in Scotland, his death in prison at
Gravesend, iv. 401.
Cameronians, sect of the Covenanters,
iv. 108 — severe proceedings against
them, ib.
Campbell, Alexander, bishop-desig
nate of Brechin, iii. 91.
Campbell, Colin, convert to Catholi
cism, iv. 27.
Campbell, Colin, missionary priest,
his report as to the Scotch College,
Paris, iv. 210 — dies of wounds re
ceived at Culloden, 401.
Campbell, George and John, charged
with Lollardism, ii. 112.
Campbell, John, bishop-elect of the
Isles, ii. 195.
Campeggio, Antony, nuncio to Scot
land, ii. 141.
Canada, Highland Catholics in, iv.
272.
Candida Casa, letter from Alcuin to
INDEX.
433
the brethren of, i. 5 — erected by St
Ninian, 8 — pilgrims to, 10, 14 —
bishops of, 12. See Whithorn,
Galloway.
Canna, visit of Bishop Nicolson to,
iv. 151 — inhabited entirely by
Catholics, 163 — Nicolson 's report
^ of, 372.
Canonesses of St Augustine at lona,
iv. 425.
Canons, institution of secular, i. 183.
Canons-regular, introduced by Alex
ander I. , i. 285 — list of their
houses in Scotland, 424.
Capuchins on the Scottish mission, iv.
73, 81 — privileges granted to, 73.
Carberry Hill, surrender of Queen
Mary at, iii. 137.
Cardney, Bishop of Dunkeld, ii. 68.
Carlisle, St Kentigern at, i. 153 —
council of, 297 — bishopric of, ib. —
Queen Mary at, iii. 165.
Carmelites, foundations of, i. 369 —
list of their houses in Scotland, iv.
424 — convents of, 425.
Carpentras, report by Mancini, Bishop
of, on the religious state of Scot
land, iii. 404, 475.
Carr, Sir Andrew, accomplice in
Darnley's murder, iii. 115.
Carriden, church of, i. 308.
Carruthers, Andrew, eastern vicar-
apostolic, iv. 283 — his death, 290.
Carsewell, John, superintendent of
Argyll and the Isles, ii. 295 ; iii.
118 — censured by the Assembly,
204.
Carthusians, their monastery at Perth,
ii. 53 — of Paris, their rights over
the Scotch College, iii. 328 ; iv.
209 — list of their houses in Scot
land, 424.
Casket Letters, the, iii. 112 note,
155, 181, 192 — conclusion as to
their authenticity, 184.
Cassillis, Gilbert, Earl of, embraces
Protestantism, iii. 103 — roasts the
commendator of Crossraguel, 213.
Castalesi, Adrian, nuncio to Scotland,
ii. 77.
Catechism, Archbishop Hamilton's, i.
xvii. ; ii. 215 — specimen of the,
421.
VOL. IV.
Catherine of Braganza, queen to
Charles II., her marriage, iv. 91 —
canonical penalties incurred by, ib.
note — text of document discussing
them, 352 — refuses to go through
Protestant marriage rite, 93.
Cecil, letter from Knox to, iii. 207.
Ceile De, Irish anchorites so called, i.
186 — brought under canonical rule,
187.
Celchyth, council of, i. 212.
Celestine I. , Pope, sends Palladius to
Scotland, i. 18, 20.
Cellach, Abbot of lona, i. 209.
Cellach, Bishop of St Andrews, i.
224.
Ceode, Abbot of lona, i. 147.
Ceolfrid, Abbot of Jarrow, i. 145,
147 note.
Chad, Bishop of York, i. 164 — and of
Mercia, ib.
Challoner, Bishop, on the death of
Queen Mary, iii. 308 — his friend
ship with Bishop Hay, iv. 214.
Chalmers, George, author of Cale
donia, on the sanctity of lona,
quoted, i. 64 — on the Catholics of
Scotland in 1810, iv. 268.
Chalmers, Thomas, Scottish mission
ary, iv. 51.
Chfilons-sur-Saone, council of, declines
to acknowledge Scottish orders, i.
212.
Chambers, David, his report on the
Scottish mission, iv. 41.
Chapman, printer of the Aberdeen
Breviary, ii. 322.
Chapters, cathedral, first erected in
Scotland, i. 304 — statutes passed
by, 371 — uiicanonically erected in
England, iii. 436 — proposed by
Bishop Nicolson for Scotland, iv.
178 — re-erection of, at Glasgow
and St Andrews, 306 note.
Charles I., King, projected Spanish
marriage of, iii. 425 — negotiations
broken off, 428 — proposed marriage
to Henrietta Maria, 428 — stipula
tions of the Pope, 430 — articles of
the marriage treaty, 431 — marriage
solemnised, 432 — proclaimed king,
iv. i. — ecclesiastical policy of, ib. —
visits Scotland, 2 — in collision with
2 E
434
INDEX.
the Kirk, 3— attempts a compro
mise, 6 — the Scotch take up arms
against him, 7 — is surrendered by
the Presbyterians to Parliament, 8
— executed at Whitehall, 8 — state
of Scotch Catholics under, ib. —
penal laws enforced by, 9, 10 — his
personal sentiments, 1 7 — occasional
indulgence shown by, 23 — George
Cone at the Court of, 53 — anoma
lous position of, 54 — his injustice
towards Catholics, 55 — efforts made
by his son on his behalf, 90.
Charles II., King, restoration of, iv.
89 — his character, 91 — marries
Catherine of Braganza, ib. — Catho
lic tendencies of, 93 — promises tol
eration, 94 — his relations with M.
Olier, ib. — sends a mission to the
Pope, 95 — favour shown to Catho
lics by, 97 et set/. — his negotiations
for reunion with Rome, 101 —
reason of their failure, 102 — his
reconciliation and death, 103 —
ecclesiastical policy of, ib. — the
penal statutes under, 120 — Hudles-
ton's account of his last hours, 353
et seq.
Charles Edward, Prince, lands in
Scotland, iv. 190 — Bishop Mac-
donald's advice to, ib. — at Preston-
pans and Culloden, 191.
Charles Emmanuel III., King of Sar
dinia, appealed to by the Pope on
behalf of Scottish Catholics, iv.
192.
Chatelherault, Duke of. See Arran.
Cheam, John of, Bishop of Glasgow,
ii. 19.
Cheyne, James, founder of Scotch
College, Tournai, iii. 388 et seq.
Chisholm, yEneas, Highland vicar-
apostolic, iv. 271, 272.
Chisholm, John, Highland vicar-
apostolic, iv. 261 — his death, 272.
Chisholm, William (I.), Bishop of
Dunblane, refuses to receive the
papal nuncio, iii. 60 — envoy to
Pius IV., 77.
Chisholm, William (II.), Bishop of
Dunblane, iii. 64 note — envoy from
Queen Mary to Pius V., 93 — the
Queen's letters to, 441 — his address
to the Pope, 442 — summoned for
saying mass, 151 — deprived of his
see and property, 154 — declared an
outlaw, 231 — named Bishop of
Vaison, 329 — becomes a Carthusian
at Grenoble, ib. — his death, ib.
note.
Chisholm, William (III.), Bishop of
Vaison, iii. 329 — his proposed ele
vation to the cardinalate, 331.
Chorepiscopi, in the early Irish Church,
i. 36.
Christianity, introduced into Britain,
i. 1 — in Scotland, 3 — embraced by
the Southern Picts, 9 — in the Ork
neys, 262.
Christians, Roman, in Britain, i. 2.
Christie, George, S.J., before James
VI., iii. 344.
Christie, William, S.J., attends
Huntly's deathbed, iv. 29 — con
verts made by, 58 — rector of Scotch
College, Douai, ib.
Chrodigang of Metz, rule of, i. 183.
Church, Scottish, relapse of the early,
i. 31 — first definitely mentioned,
218 — St Margaret's reforms in the,
245 — supremacy claimed by York
over the, 254 — its diocesan reorgan
isation under David I., 304 —
attempted subjection to England of
the, 319 — declared independent,
329— extinction of the Celtic, 335
— violation of the liberties of the,
364 — its independence confirmed at
Brigham, ii. 5 — abolished by Act of
Parliament, 307 — its material con
dition at the Reformation, 311 et
seq. — division of the plunder of the,
315 — relics of the early, 363 — its
liturgy, 391 et seq. — liturgy of the
medieval, 404 et seq. — statistics of
the, under Queen Anne, iv. 162 —
gradual development of the, under
Bishop Hay, 268 — in the Highlands,
271— state of the (1800-1829), 273
— Cardinal York's legacy to the,
285, 286 — internal divisions in the,
291— present position and prospects
of the, 334.
Cistercians, list of their houses in
Scotland, iv. 424 — convents of,
425.
INDEX.
435
Claudia, wife of Pudens, supposed
British origin of, i. 3.
Clement, Bishop of Dunblane, i. 361.
Clement III., Pope, on the claims of
York, i. 327— declares the Scottish
Church independent, 329.
Clement IV., Pope, sends a legate to
Scotland, i. 365.
Clement VI., Pope, consecrates a
Bishop of Man, ii. 31.
Clement VII., Pope, letter from
James V. to, ii. 104 — privileges
granted to the see of Glasgow by,
133 — sends an envoy to Scotland,
134 — confirms the institution of
the College of Justice, 139.
Clement VII., anti-pope, supported
by Scotland, ii. 45.
Clement VIII., Pope, assists the
Catholic cause in Scotland, iii. 323
— his solicitude for Scotland, 354,
393 — writes to James VI. and his
Queen, 394 — the king's reply, 395
— text of his letter to Queen Anne,
473.
Clement XI., Pope, his brief against
Jansenism, iv. 201.
Clement XII., Pope, prescribes the
anti-Jansenistic formula throughout
Scotland, iv. 203.
Clement XIV., Pope, suppresses the
Society of Jesus, iv. 227.
Clifton, Walter de, preceptor of the
Templars, ii. 21.
Clonard, Saint Finnian of, i. 40, 41
— -three thousand monks at, 45.
Cluniac Benedictines, i. 317 — list of
their houses in Scotland, iv. 424.
Co-arbs, term applied to the abbots
of lona, i. 207.
Cochheus, controversy of Alexander
Aless with, ii. 146.
Coldingham, founded by St Aidan, i.
121— St Cuthbert at, 167— restored
by King Edgar, 271.
Coldstream, Cistercian convent at, i,
316.
Coligny, Admiral, communications of
Regent Moray with, iii. 149.
Coll, Protestant zeal of the laird of,
iv. 188 note.
College of Justice, institution of the,
ii. 138.
Colleges, episcopal, in the early Irish
Church, i. 37.
Collegiate churches, first foundation
of, ii. 29 — their scope and object,
184— list of, 414 et seq.
Colman, Bishop of Lindisfarne, i.
131 — opponent of Wilfrid at the
Synod of Whitby, 136— case decided
against him, 138 — refuses to sub
mit, and resigns his see, 139 —
returns to Ireland, 140.
Columba, St, Irish monasteries
founded by, i. 41, 57 — his birth
and training, 56, 57 — legend of his
banishment, 58 — true cause of his
quitting Ireland, 61 — arrives at
lona, 63 — Protestant writers on,
64, 65 — converts King Brude, 66
— his missionary labours, 68 — con
secrates King Aidan, 74 — at the
Synod of Drumceatt, 75 — his love
of country, 77 — work of his life, 78
— his foundations, 79 — revisits Ire
land, 83 — his pilgrimage to Rome,
84 — his last days, 86 — his death,
88 — his character as drawn by
Montalembert, ib. — by Adamnan,
89 — his so-called Rule, 91 — his
successors, 110 — his meeting with
St Kentigern, 155 — removal of his
relics to Ireland, 211 — brought
back to lona, 212 — taken to Dun-
keld, 215— to Ireland, 218, 227—
manuscript written by him, ii. 360.
Columbanus, St, Rule of, i. 92, 98,
182.
Colville, John, convert to Catholicism,
iii. 332 — his works, ib. note.
Comgall, founder of monastery at
Bangor, i. 43.
Comyn, Lord, one of the council of
regency, ii. 2 — killed by Bruce at
Dumfries, 12.
Conall, King of Dalriada, grants lona
to St Columba, i. 66 — his death,
74.
Cone, Edmund, Franciscan mission
ary in Scotland, iv. 66, 72.
Cone, George, Scotch secular priest,
iv. 53 — papal agent in London, 54
— his relations with Charles I., ib.
— barrenness of his mission, 56 —
his death, ib.
436
INDEX.
Confession of Faith, Protestant,
sanctioned by the Parliament of
1560, ii. 303 — analysis of the, iii.
1 , 2 — compilers of the, 3 — the
"King's," 250 — amended under
James VI., 382 — Catholics ordered
to subscribe the, iv. 229 — Mr
Macrae and the Westminster, 330
et seq.
Confiscation of Church property by
Parliament, ii. 309.
Congregation, establishment of the,
ii. 232— meets at Perth, 265—
manifestoes issued by the, 267 —
seizes the Mint, 273 — its negoti
ations with the English Govern
ment, 281— triumph of the, 291—
its activity, 294.
Conmael, Abbot of lona, i. 146.
Conservators of provincial councils, i.
342, 343.
Constantine I., King, and the legend
of St Andrew, i. 192.
Constantine II., King, i. 201 — fixes
the primacy at Abernethy, 216 —
holds assembly at Scone, 220 — his
death, 221.
Corda, Oswald de, prior of Carthu
sians at Perth, ii. 97.
Coroticus, king of the Picts, i. 31,
32.
Corrichie, battle of, iii. 68.
Councils, general, third Lateran, i.
324— fourth do., 339— of Lyons,
367— of Basle, ii. 52— of Trent,
169 — Vatican, iv. 291 — provincial,
i. 295, 341, 349, 351, 367; ii. 18,
19, 28, 63, 85, 111, 138, 169, 200,
211, 240, 251 note.
Covenant, National, subscription of
the, iv. 5 — burned at Holyrood,
104.
Covenant, Solemn League and, iv. 7
— subscribed by Charles II., 90.
Covenanters, the, take up arms against
Charles!., iv. 7 — destroy the rood-
screen at Elgin, 31 — open rebellion
of, 106 — their sufferings, ib. —
defeated at Bothwell, 108.
Craig, John, ex - Dominican and
preacher, iii. 32, 33 — protests
against Queen Mary's marriage to
Bothwell, 131 — assists at the cere
mony, 132 — draws up the "King's
Confession," 250.
Crambeth, Bishop of Dunkeld, ii. 24.
Crannoch, Bishop of Brechin, ii. 52,
68.
Crawar, Paul, Hussite teacher, ii. 55.
— his tenets, 56 — executed for
heresy, 57.
Crawford, David, ninth Earl of, adher
ent of Queen Mary, iii. 211, 285 —
on Burghley's list of Catholic lords,
313 — conversion of his brother,
345.
Crawford, Thomas, witness against
Queen Mary at Westminster, iii.
194.
Creighton, Robert, missionary in
Scotland, condemned to death, iii.
407.
Creighton, William, S.J., iii. 258 —
imprisoned by Queen Elizabeth, 337.
Crichton of Brunston, agent of Henry
VIII., ii. 166, 173.
Crichton, Robert, Bishop of Dunkeld,
ii. 194; iii. 61, 64.
Crinan, lay-Abbot of Dunkeld, i. 233,
238.
Criton, James, envoy from Pope
Clement VII., ii. 134.
Cromwell, Oliver, condition of Scottish
Catholics under, iv. 8 — his dealings
with the Kirk, 86 — moral and re
ligious state of Scotland under, 87
— his decrees against Catholics, 345,
351.
Cross, sign of the, at lona, i. 104.
Crossraguel, Cluniac Abbey of, i. 356
— Kennedy, last abbot of, ii. 253 —
demolition of, iii. 15 — temporalities
of, bestowed on George Buchanan,
78 — Allan Stewart commendator of,
107 note — "roasting of the abbot"
of, 213.
Croyser, William, Archdeacon of
Teviotdale, ii. 65 — nuncio to Scot
land, 67.
Crucifubreis, Alfonso de, papal nuncio
to Scotland, ii. 82.
Cruikshanks, citizen of Edinburgh,
condemned to death for harbouring
priests, iii. 402.
Crusades, Scottish barons at the, i.
366.
INDEX.
437
Cuil-Dremhne (Cooldrevny), battle of,
i. 58.
Culdees, when first so called, i. 174 —
misuse of the term, ib. — sprung from
the early Deicoht, 181 — the Saxon
Godefrihte, 185 — the Ceile De in
Ireland, 186— called in Scotland
Kelfidei, 188 — brought under canon
ical rule, 198 — synonymous with
secular canons, 199 — of Lochleven,
222, 237, 239, 255— of St Andrews,
257, 341— of Ross, 291— of Dor-
noch, 293 — their suppression, 298
ct seq.
Culloden, battle of, iv. 191 — sufferings
of Scottish Catholics after, 192.
Culross, Cistercian abbey founded at,
i. 356.
Cumberland, Wm. Augustus, Duke of,
his cruelty after Culloden, iv. 192 —
opposes Catholic emancipation, 277.
Cumbria, kingdom of, i. 149 — evan
gelised by St Kentigern, ib. — united
to Scotland, 229.
Cummene, Abbot of lona, i. 131 — his
death, 141.
Cummian, Abbot of Durrow, i. 123.
Cupar, monastery of, i. 310, 316.
Curie, Hippolytus, S.J., benefactor of
Scotch College, Douai, iii. 391 —
rector of the College, iv. 220.
Cuthbert, St, Bede's life of, i. 158—
his birth and parentage, 159 — enters
Melrose, 160 - — guest - master at
Ripon, ib. — his labours and austeri
ties, 161 — made prior of Lindis-
farne, 162 — retires to Fame, 163 —
consecrated Bishop of Lindisfarne,
166— his death and burial, 167 —
devotion to him, 169 — his tomb at
Durham, ib. — enshrining of his
relics, 211.
DABI, St, his well at Dull, i. 161.
Daganus, Bishop, visits lona, i. 112.
Dalian Forghaill, his portrait of St
Columba, i. 61, 90.
Dalltoun, Thomas de, Bishop of Gal
loway, ii. 25.
Dalriada, establishment of the Scottish
kingdom of, i. 28 — declared inde
pendent, 76 — united with the Picts
under Kenneth Mac Alpine, 215.
Damasus, Pope, receives St Ninian in
Rome, i. 7.
Danes, the, ravage Northumbria, i.
201— and lona, 209, 213, 226.
Darius, Sylvester, nuncio to Scotland,
ii. 140.
Darnley, Henry, Earl of, his lineage,
iii. 80 — marries Queen Mary, 81 —
proclaimed King of Scots, ib. — at
matins and mass, 88 — his jealousy
of Rizzio, 96 — privy to his murder,
97 — his political schemes, 110 —
falls ill at Glasgow, ib. — sentiments
of Mary towards him, 111 — con
spiracy against, 112 — murdered at
Kirk-of-Field, 114 — trial and exe
cution of accomplices in the crime,
159.
D'Aubigny, Esm6 Stuart, his influence
over James VI., iii. 248 — created
Earl of Lennox, 249 — signs the
Protestant Confession, 259 — vacil
lating character of, ib. — his death,
271.
David, Bishop of Moray, ii. 24.
David, Earl of Huntingdon, i. 308.
David I., King, his Earldom of Cum
bria and Lothian, i. 271 — succeeds
to the crown, 287 — his wars, ib.—
his religious foundations, 288 — re
stores the bishopric of Glasgow, ib.
— new sees founded by him, 291,
292, 303 — suppresses the Culdees,
298 — introduces new religious
orders, 301 et seq. — organisation of
the Scottish Church under, 304 —
his character, 311 — his death, 313.
David II., King, ii. 25 — imprisoned in
London, 27 — divorces his queen, ib.
—his death, 31.
David, St, founder of Menevia, i. 40 —
receives St Kentigern, 153.
Davidson, Robert, missionary in Scot
land, iv. 125 — his sufferings and
death, 126.
Dawston, battle of, i. 114.
Deaneries, establishment of rural, i.
305.
Deer, monastery of, i. 293, 356 — the
Book of, ii. 357 et seq. — extract from
it, 423.
Deerness, Celtic monastery at, ii. 351.
Deicolia, the early hermits so called, i.
438
INDEX.
181 — brought under canonical rule,
183 — in the Saxon Church, 184.
Dempster, Thomas, S.J. , professor at
the Scotch College, Rome, iv. 65 —
his imprisonment and death, ib.
Dempster, William, philosopher, ii.
386.
Denbigh, Rudolph, Earl of, converted
by Bishop Gillis, iv. 291.
Derry, Columban foundation at, i. 41
— love of St Columba for, 78.
Devorgoil, foundress of Sweetheart
Abbey, i. 369.
Diarmaid, attendant on St Columba,
i. 86.
Diarmaid, Abbot of lona, i. 213.
Diarmaid, King of Ireland, i. 58, 60.
Discipline, First Book of, analysis of
the, iii. 5 et seq. — Second Book of,
244.
Doire, Malise, possessor of St Fillan's
crosier, ii. 365.
Dolgfin, Bishop of Orkney, ii. 25.
Dominicanesses at Edinburgh, iv.
425.
Dominicans, King Alexander III. and
the, i. 357 — their houses in Scot
land, ib., iv. 424.
Donald, King, i. 4.
Donnan of Egg, St, his martyrdom,
i. 113.
Donydower, Stephen de, Bishop of
Glasgow, ii. 23.
Dorbeni, Abbot of lona, i. 147.
Dornoch, church of, i. 293 — cathedral
built at, 359.
Douai, Scotch College at, its founda
tion, iii. 389 — transferred for a
time to Louvain, ib. — benefactions
to, 390, 391 — Franciscan convent
at, iv. 72 — need of reform in the
College, 121 — successive rectors of,
220 — recovery of its funds by
Bishop Hay, 221 — the College
under the Revolution, ib.
Douglas, David, executed for pro
fessing Catholicism, iii. 231.
Douglas, Gavin, Provost of St Giles',
ii. 117 — Bishop of Dunkeld, 125 —
his death, ib. — witty retort of, 131
— his writings, 342.
Douglas, George, son of the Lady of
Lochleven, iii. 143 — assists Queen
Mary's escape, 161 — accompanies
her flight, 163.
Douglas, Sir James, ii. 15, 16.
Douglas, John, ex-Carmelite, chap
lain to Earl of Argyle, ii. 230, 233,
237 — usurps the see or St Andrews,
iii. 220, 221.
Douglas, Lady, custodian of Queen
Mary at Lochleven, iii. 139.
Douglas, Marquis of. See Angus,
Earl of.
Downpatrick, St Columba's relics at,
i. 2-27.
Draxholm, imprisonment and death
of Bothwell at, iii. 148.
Drontheim, subjection of Man and
the Isles to, i. 307 — Man made
suffragan of the see of, 371 — pro
test of the Archbishop of, ii. 91.
Drumceatt, St Columba at the synod
of, i. 75.
Drummond, Alexander, missionary in
Scotland, death of, iv. 195, 397 —
charged by Lercari with Jansenism,
411.
Drummond, Annabella, queen to
Robert III., ii. 33.
Dryburgh, monastery of, i. 303 —
burned by the English, ii. 169.
Dubthach, Abbot of Raphoe, co-arb
of St Columba, i. 223.
Duddingston, conversion of the min
ister of, iv. 68.
Duff', King of Scotland, i. 222.
Duggan, Lazarist missionary in Scot
land, iv. 83.
Dull, monastery of, founded by
Adamnan, i. 146 — St Cuthbert at,
161 — secularisation of its property,
233, 285.
Dullmullen, Gilbertine house at, iv.
425.
Dumbarton, capital of Strathclyde, i.
149 — collegiate church at, ii. 416 —
captured by the Regent Lennox,
iii. 213.
Dumfries, conversion of the governor
of, iii. 341 — persecution of Cath
olics at, iv. 27, 28 — Protestant
rising at, 163 — death of Bishop
Macdonell at, 272 note.
Dunbar, Alexander. See Winster.
Dunbar, Gavin, Archbishop of Glas-
INDEX.
439
gow, ii. 133, 137, 138, 159, 171,
182— his death, 183.
Dunbar, Gavin, Bishop of Aberdeen,
ii. 183 — defacement of his tomb,
iv. 30.
Dunbar, Scottish poet, iii. 345.
Dunbar, Trinitarian house at, i. 356
— collegiate church of, ii. 30, 415
— Queen Mary a prisoner at, iii.
120, 121.
Dunblane, foundation of, i. 83 —
bishopric of, 303 — subjected to
Glasgow, ii. 110 — restored to St
Andrews, 119 — succession of
bishops of, 426 — shameful treat
ment of priests at, iii. 205.
Duncadh, Abbot of lona, i. 147, 203.
Duncan, Bishop of Man, ii. 42.
Duncan, King, i. 236 — slain by Mac
beth, 237.
Dundee, council at, i. 18 — destruc
tion of convents at, ii. 173 — witches
burned at, iii. 205.
Dundrennan, monastery of, i. 302 —
Thomas, Abbot of, at the Council
of Basle, ii. 79 — Queen Mary at,
iii. 163.
Dunfermline, royal seat, i. 241 —
royal burial-place, 259, 261 — Bene
dictine monastery at, 301 — sack of
the abbey, ii. 276 — Fergusson
appointed preacher at, 294 — Cath
olic commendators of, iii. 318 note.
Dunkeld, becomes primatial see, i.
215— lay abbots of, 233, 256— see
of, 284 ; ii. 69 — subjected to Glas
gow, 110 — restored to St Andrews,
119 — succession of bishops of, 427
- — restoration of the bishopric, iv.
310, 416 — extent of the see of,
417.
Dunkirk, Benedictine convent at, iv.
99 — Thomas Nicolson confessor
to the nuns of, 147.
Duimichen, church of, i. 27 — battle
of, 127, 173.
Dupplin, battle of, ii. 26.
Durham, St Cuthbert's shrine at, i.
169— David II. defeated at, ii. 27.
Durie, John, S.J., converts Lord
Maxwell, iii. 314, 341.
Durrow, Columban foundation at, i.
57— the Book of, ii. 360.
EADMER, bishop - designate of St
Andrews, i. 276 — his difficulties,
277 — his advisers, 279 — returns to
England, 281— his death, 282.
Easter, reckoning of, in the early
Irish Church, i. 37 — commence
ment of discussion as to, 111 —
twofold controversy as to, 134 —
the question discussed at Whitby,
136 — the Roman, accepted by the
synod, 139 — communion, among
the Celts, 247.
Eata, first Abbot of Melrose, i.
121.
Ebba, St, procures liberation of Wil
frid, i. 165.
Eborius, Bishop of York, attends the
Council of Aries, i. 4.
Eccles, Cistercian convent at, i. 316.
Edana, St, legend of, i. 31.
Edgar, King of Scotland, i. 269 —
restores Coldingham, 270 — his
death, 271.
Edilweld, Bishop of Lindisfarne, i.
172.
Edinburgh, origin of the name of, i.
31 — included in diocese of Lindis
farne, 173 — Cistercian convent at,
i. 323 — provincial councils at, ii.
138, 200, 211, 240— foundation of
university of, 198— treaty of, 289
— pre-Reformation hospitals at, 417
— theological disputation at, iii. 13
— seat of an Anglican bishopric, 385
note — anti-Catholic demonstrations
at, iv. 109, 137, 138, 160, 164—
Catholic population of, under Queen
Anne, 162 — No-Popery riots at, 235
el seq. — foundation of St Margaret's
convent at, 282.
Ednam, church of St Cuthbert at, i.
271.
Edward, Bishop of Aberdeen, i. 292.
Edward I., King of England, ii. 3 —
invades Scotland, 7 — deposes
Baliol, 8— his death, 12.
Edward II., King, ii. 13, 23.
Edward III., King, ii. 26, 30, 31.
Edwin, King of Deira, conversion of,
i. 115 — his death, ib.
Effetti, George degli, papal agent in
London, iii. 396.
Egbert, induces the monks of lona
440
INDEX.
to conform to Rome, i. 147, 203 —
his death at lona, 205.
Egfrid, King of Northumbria, i. 127
—expels St Wilfrid, 142— killed
at Dunnichen, 143.
Egg, martyrdom of St -Doiman of, i.
113 — visit of Bishop Nicolson to,
iv. 151, 371.
Eichstadt, Scotch monastery at, iii.
392 — benefactions to Ratisbon of
the bishops of, iv. 176.
Eithne, mother of St Columba, i. 56.
Elbottle, convent at, i. 303.
Elfleda, Abbess of Whitby, i. 167.
Elgin, burned by Wolf of Badenoch,
ii. 29, 41 — Franciscan convent at,
98 — architecture of the cathedral
of, 389 — burial of Lord Huntly at,
iv. 29 — destruction of the rood-
screen at, 31 — Ballantyne buried
at, 46.
Elizabeth, Princess, daughter of
James I., her education, i. 15.
Elizabeth, Queen, her aversion to
Knox, ii. 280 — sponsor of James
VI., iii. 104 — buys Queen Mary's
jewels, 160 — Mary's appeal to, 165
— her policy regarding Mary, ib. —
refuses to receive her, 166 — her
relations with Moray, 167 — violates
her solemn promise, 187 — intrigues
to surrender Mary to Moray, 207
— and to Mar, 218 — her efforts to
save Morton's life, 251 — plot to
murder her, 273 — its lawfulness
discussed, 274 — continued affection
of Mary for, 287 — her plan for
Mary's assassination, 305 — signs
her death-warrant, ib. — pensions
James VI. , 315 — stipulates for the
expulsion of Jesuits from Scotland,
340 — her death and character, 371.
Elphinston, William, convert to Ca
tholicism, iii. 352 — dies a Jesuit
novice, ib.
Elphinstone, Nicolas, confidential
agent of Moray, iii. 160, 207, 218.
Elphinstone, William, Bishop of Ross,
ii. 127 — translated to Aberdeen, ib.
— founds Aberdeen University, 128
—his death, 129.
Emancipation, bill for Catholic, iv.
276 — feeling in Scotland against,
ib. — distinguished Scotchmen in
favour of, 277 — the bill becomes
law, ib. — position of Catholics after,
278 — its effect on the development
of the Church, 281.
Emigration of Highland Catholics, iv.
219, 271, 272.
Episcopalianism, leanings of Regent
Morton towards, iii. 219 — in con
flict with Presbyterianism, 357 e,t
seq. — established in Scotland, 362
— predilection of Charles I. for, iv.
1 — restored by Charles II., 104 —
effect of the fall of James II. on,
137 — toleration secured to, at the
Union, 158 — its prelates protest
against the restoration of the Cath
olic hierarchy, 315.
Eremitical life, development of the, i.
179— in Ireland, 185.
Erfurt, Scotch monastery at, iii. 247
note, 392 note ; iv. 82.
Eric, King of Norway, father of
Queen Margaret, ii. 2.
Ermengarde, mother of Alexander II. ,
co-foundress of Balmerino, i. 356.
Ernald, Bishop of St Andrews, i. 315.
Errol, Francis, eighth Earl of, con
verted to Catholicism, iii. 314, 341
— apostasy of, 354 — his scruples,
403— his death, iv. 29.
Erskine, Charles, Cardinal, sketch of
his career, iv. 259 note.
Erskine of Dun, John, leading re
former, ii. 223; iii. 76, 204, 220.
Ethelred, Prince, his grant to the
Culdees of Lochleven, i. 255.
Eugenius III., Pope, consecrates Her
bert, Bishop of Glasgow, i. 150 —
suppresses the Culdees of St An
drews, 299.
Eugenius IV., Pope, ii. 65, 80 — ac
knowledged by Scottish Church,
81.
Eyre, Charles, appointed to the West
ern Vicariate, iv. 295 — named
apostolic delegate, 297 — trans
lated to the See of Glasgow, 311
— the Glasgow Herald on, 341.
FAELCHU, Abbot of lona, i. 204.
Fail, Trinitarian house at, i. 369 —
demolition of, iii. 15.
INDEX.
441
Failbhe, Abbot of lona, i. 141.
Fairfoul, David, missionary in Scot
land, imprisoned and banished, iv.
142.
Falaise, treaty of, i. 318.
Falkland, death of James V. at, ii. 157.
Fame, St Cuthbert's hermitage at, i.
163.
Farquharson, Abbe", rector of the Scotch
College, Douai, iv. 222.
Farquharson, John and Charles, Jesuit
missionaries in Scotland, iv. 402 —
their banishment, ib:
Fedleimidh, father of St Columba, i.
56.
Feidhlimidh, Abbot of lona, i. 205.
Feilding, conversion of Viscount, iv.
291.
Fe'nelon, La Mothe, French ambassa
dor, iii. 189 note — his efforts on
behalf of Queen Mary, 201— ban
quet to, 269.
Feradach, Abbot of lona, i. 218.
Fergna, Brit, Abbot of lona, i. 112.
Fergus, Lord of Galloway, founder of
Dundrennan, i. 302.
Fergus, St, legend of, i. 178.
Ferguson, appointed preacher at Dun-
fermline, ii. 294.
Ferhfjinn, reader in the Celtic Church,
i. 186 — at lona, 334 — his jurisdic
tion, ii. 328.
Fernihurst, converted by Father Tyrie,
iii. 210.
Ferrerius of Piedmont, at Kinloss
Abbey, ii. 196.
Festivals, Christian, suppressed by the
Book of Discipline, iii. 5 — Winzet's
defence of the, 50 — kept in Geneva,
but not in Scotland, 103 — Spalding
on the abolition of, iv. 32 — number
of, as laid down by Bishop Nicol-
son, 172.
Feudalism, introduced into Scotland
by David I., i. 287.
Fieschi, Ottoboni de, papal legate to
Scotland, i. 365.
Fife, Malcolm, Earl of, founder of
Culross, i. 356.
Fillan, St, churches dedicated to, i.
27, 146 — story of his crosier, ii.
365 et seq.
Finan, St, second Bishop of Lindis-
farne, i. 128 — founder of Whitby,
129— his death, 130.
Finbar, St, church of Dornoch dedi
cated to, i. 192.
Finlay, Bishop of Argyle, ii. 68.
Finnian of Clonard, St, i. 40.
Finnian of Moville, St, at Whit-
horn, i. 11, 39— teacher of St Col
umba, 57 — his death, ib.
Finnie, Alexander, converted Episco
palian minister, iv. 162.
Fintry, Graham of, corresponds with
Archbishop Beaton, iii. 277 — his
arrest and execution, 319.
Fitz-Alan, founder of Paisley, i. 317.
Fitzgerald, Lord Robert, demands
protection for the Scotch College,
Paris, iv. 221.
Flann, Abbot of lona, last of founder's
kin, i. 218.
Fleming, Archbishop of Dublin, sends
missionaries to Scotland, iv. 66.
Fleming, Malcolm, Lord, founder of
church at Biggar, ii. 183.
Fleming, Malcolm, Prior of Whithorn,
summoned for saying mass, iii. 72 —
imprisoned, 73.
Fleming, Placid, Abbot of St James's,
Ratisbon, iv. 175 — founds a sem
inary there, ib.
Flodden, battle of, i. 102.
Fogo, John of, Abbot of Melrose, ii.
57, 61.
Forbes, A. P., Bishop, on St Ninian,
quoted, i. 15 — liturgical works
edited by ii. 406, 408 — on the sem
inary at Ratisbon, quoted, iv. 177
note.
Forbes, James, superior of the Scot
tish Jesuits, iv. 127.
Forbes, John, Moderator of the Kirk,
imprisoned by James VI., iii. 377.
Forbes, John, Master of (Father Arch
angel), iii. 408 — becomes a Capu
chin, 409— his death, ib. — permis
sion given by Pope Paul V. to, 476.
Forbes, Thomas, convert to Catholi
cism, iv. 139.
Forbes, William, Master of (Father
Archangel), iii. 409 note.
Fordun, his development of the legend
of St Palladius, i. 20— his life and
work, ii. 338.
442
INDEX.
Foreman, Andrew, Bishop of Moray,
ii. 116 — translated to St Andrews,
118 — synod held by, 117 — his
death, 125.
Forglen, church of, founded by Adam-
nan, i. 146.
Forrest, Henry, burned at St Andrews,
ii. 144.
Forrester, Alexander, missionary in
Scotland, iv. 402 — his imprisonment
and banishment, ib. note.
Forrester, Robert, burned at Edin
burgh, ii. 144.
Forret, Thomas, burned at Edinburgh,
ii. 144.
Fort-Augustus, provincial council of,
ii. 251 note — Benedictine abbey at,
iv. 336.
Fortrenn, ancient Pictish bishopric,
i. 216.
Fothad, last Celtic Bishop of St An
drews, i. 222 et seq., 239 — his
death, 254.
Fotheringay, trial and execution of
Queen Mary at, iii. 204, 205.
France, alliance of Scotland with, ii.
45 — the nuncio to, named Ordinary
of England and Scotland, iii. 253 —
reception in England of emigrant
clergy from, iv. 267 — their employ
ment in Scotland, ib.
Francis, Dauphin of France, married
to Queen Mary, ii. 197 — his death,
iii. 18.
Franciscans, introduced into Scotland,
i. 357 — their foundations in the
fifteenth century, ii. 97, 132 — James
V. and the, 139, 160— attacked by
Buchanan, 139 note — convent of,
at Douai, iv. 72 — list of their
houses in Scotland, 424 — convents
of, 425.
Frankfort, John Knox pastor at, ii.
222.
Frascati, Charles Edward Stuart
buried at, iv. 285 — death of Cardinal
of York at, 286.
Fraser, John, Scottish Franciscan, ii.
343.
Fraser, John, Rector of Paris Univer
sity, iii. 332.
Fraser, William, Bishop of St An
drews, i. 370 ; ii. 20.
Free Church of Scotland, origin of the,
iv. 322 — its influence, 323.
Friars, spread of the, in Scotland, i.
356.
Frithwald, Bishop of Galloway, i. 13.
Froissart, on the death of Robert
Bruce, ii. 15.
Froude, unfounded assertions of, iii.
133, 138 note — on Queen Eliza
beth, 372.
Fulda, bishopric of, i. 95 note — Scot
tish abbey at, iii. 392.
Futerna, monastery at Whithorn
known as, i. 39.
GALL, Robert, S.J., missionary in
Scotland, iv. 64 — his report to his
general, ib.
Galloway, Alexander, four times
rector of Aberdeen University, ii.
129.
Galloway, history of the see of, i. 13 —
declared subject to York, 290 ; ii.
25, 42 — made a suffragan of St
Andrews, 90 — succession of bishops
of, 427 — restoration of the see of,
iv. 310, 416— its extent, 417.
Gamaliel, Bishop of Man, i. 307.
Gameline, Bishop of St Andrews, i.
370.
Garioch, Elizabeth, her sufferings for
the faith, iv. 22.
Gartan, birthplace of St Columba, i.
56.
Gartnaidh, King, founder of church
at Abernethy, i. 82.
Geddes, Jenny, iv. 5.
Geddes, John, sent to Valladolid, iv.
58 — named coadjutor to Bishop
Hay, 248 — his consecration, 249 —
his missionary labours, 255 — con
demns the Catholic oath, 257 — his
action with regard to the Scotch
College, Paris, 260— his death, 261.
Geneva, John Knox at, ii. 222, 227.
George I., King, grants money in aid
of Highland Protestantism, iv. 166.
George, III., King, address from the
Scottish Catholics to, iv. 240.
Gervadius, St, apostle of Moray, i.
283.
Gibbon (historian), on the Gordon
Riots, quoted, iv. 245.
INDEX.
443
Gibson, William, coadjutor to Car
dinal Beaton, ii. 155.
Gifford, Gilbert, instrument of Wal-
singham, iii. 292 — sketch of his
career, 293 — his character, 294 —
his treachery towards Queen Mary,
295.
Gilbertines, at Dulmullen, iv. 425.
Gilda Aldan, Bishop of Galloway,
acknowledges the claim of York, i.
290.
Gildas, historian of sixth century, i.
40.
Gillies, Dr, his harangue against
Catholic relief, iv. 234.
Gillis, James, his efforts for the foun
dation of St Margaret's Convent,
iv. 282— early life of, 286— con
secrated bishop, 287— visits France
and Germany, ib. — his business at
Ratisbon, 288 — succeeds to the
Eastern Vicariate, 290 — introduces
religious orders, 291 — conversions
through his means, ib. — his death,
ib.
Giraldus Cambrensis, on abuses in the
Welsh Church, i. 234.
Gladstone, W. E., editor of Hamilton's
Catechism, ii. 216 note — advo
cates Scottish disestablishment, iv.
325 note — 011 the Anglican Church,
330.
Glasgow, church of St Thenog in,
i. 151 — Kentigern first bishop of,
152— arms of, 155 — early history of
the see of, 157 — bishopric of, re
stored by David I., 288 — erection
of cathedral chapter of, 290 —
building of cathedral of, 336 — foun
dation of university of, ii. 86 —
Franciscan convent at, 98 — privi
leges of the see of, 109 — raised to
an archbishopric, 110 — riot in the
cathedral of, 171 — succession of
bishops of, 424 — chartulary of,
rescued by Abbe" Macpherson, iii.
328— martyrdom of F. Ogilvie at,
417 — anti- Catholic riots at, iv. 234
— progress of the church at, 275,
284 — effect of the Irish immigration
to, 292 — its claim to metropolitan
rank, 303 —cathedral chapter re-
erected at, 306 note — restoration
of the archbishopric of, 310 — Mgr.
Eyre named archbishop of, 311 —
extent of the see, 416.
Glasnevin, St Columba a student at,
i. 57.
Glencairn, Alexander, fifth Earl of,
in arms against Mary of Guise, ii.
269— destroys the altars at Holy-
rood, iii. 140.
Glendochart, lay abbacy of, i. 285.
Glendoning, Matthew of, Bishop of
Glasgow, ii. 41.
Glenfinnan, raising of Charles Ed
ward's standard at, iv. 191.
Glengarry, conversion of the chief of,
iv. 83 — adventures of Father White
in, 84 note — Catholic school at,
119 — death of Father Munro in the
castle of, 126 — fencibles, embodi
ment of the, 272 note — Bishop
Nicolson, at, 372.
Gleiilivat, battle of, iii. 322.
Glenluce, Cistercian abbey of, i. 332.
Godrich, Bishop of St Andrews, ii.
334.
Goodman, Christopher, appointed
preacher at St Andrews, ii. 294.
Gordon, Alexander, bishop -elect of
Aberdeen, ii. 131.
Gordon, Alexander, archbishop-elect
of Glasgow, ii. 195 — translated to
Athens in partibus, ib. — professes
Protestantism, 292 — applies for of
fice of superintendent, iii. 31.
Gordon, Alexander, fourth Duke of,
his indulgence towards Catholics,
iv. 255.
Gordon, Alexander, S.J., missionary
in Scotland, dies in prison at In
verness, iv. 400.
Gordon, Andrew, circumstances of
the conversion of, iv. 193 note.
Gordon, attainder of the barons of,
iii. 69.
Gordon, George, first Duke of, im
prisoned for hearing mass, iv. 143
— his death, 167-
Gordon, Lord George, riots instigated
by, iv. 245, 246.
Gordon of Gicht, George, proceedings
against, iii. 398.
Gordon, James, S.J., missionary la
bours of, iii. 338 — converts Lord
444
INDEX.
Errol, 341 — banished, ib. — returns
to Scotland, 343 — disputes with
the preachers, ib. — acknowledges
subsidy from the Papal treasury,
449.
Gordon, James, rector of the Scotch
College, Paris, iv. 159 — appointed
coadjutor to Bishop Nicolson, 179
— his consecration, 180 — visits the
Highlands, ib.— his zeal, 181, 184
— Bishop Wallace named coadjutor
to, 182 — consecrates the first High
land vicar-apostolic, 189 — Bishop
Smith coadjutor to, 194 — his death,
195 — translation of his reports to
Propaganda, 377, 381, 383, 395—
charged by Lercari with Jansenism,
412.
Gordon, John, his sufferings for the
faith, iii. 352, 458.
Gordon of Craig, John, his petition to
the Privy Council, iv. 20.
Gordon, John, S.J., superior of the
Scottish Jesuits, iv. 127.
Gordon, John, (Protestant) Bishop of
Galloway, convert to Catholicism,
iv. 139, 140.
Gordon, Lord, commission to, iv. 18
— his report, ib.
Gordons of Tilliesoul cited for Popery,
iv. 11, 19.
Gordon, William, Bishop of Aber
deen, ii. 182.
Gouda, Nicholas of, nuncio to Queen
Mary, iii. 58 — his report, 59 et
seq.
Gourlay, Norman, burned for heresy,
ii. 144.
Gowrie, Earl of, carries off James VI.
to Stirling, iii. 257 — his execution,
261.
Graham, murderer of James I., ii.
53.
Graham, Patrick, first Archbishop of
St Andrews, ii. 88 — charges brought
against him, 93 — his deprivation
and death, 94.
Grant, Alexander, vicar - apostolic-
designate of the Highlands, iv.
187 — his disappearance, 188.
Grant, James, imprisoned at Inver
ness, iv. 199 — named coadjutor to
Bishop Smith, ib. — death of, 217.
Gray, John, Western vicar-apostolic,
assists at Vatican Council, iv. 291
receives an Irish coadjutor, 293 —
his resignation, 294.
Greenlaw, Gilbert de, Bishop of Aber
deen, ii. 41.
Gregory, employed to tamper with
Queen Mary's letters, iii. 295.
Gregory, Bishop of Ross, attends
third Lateran Council, i. 324.
Gregory I., Pope St, visited by St
Columba, i. 84, 85 — sends St
Augustine to Britain, 111 — styled
co-arb of St Peter, 208— his letter
to St Augustine, 254, 272.
Gregory VIII., Pope, i. 327.
Gregory IX., Pope, petition from
King Alexander II. to, i. 341.
Gregory X., Pope, summons Scotch
bishops to Council of Lyons, i. 367.
Gregory XIII., Pope, correspondence
of Scotch bishops with, iii. 339 —
letter of John Irving to, 241 —
writes to James VI. , 245 — his
plans as to the Scoto-German mon
asteries, 246— cognisant of the plot
to murder Queen Elizabeth, 274 —
letter from James VI. to, 279 —
subsidises the proposed Spanish
expedition, 285 — supports Scottish
seminaries abroad, 252, 389.
Gregory XV., Pope, iii. 426 — death
of, 427 — text of his letter to Charles,
Prince of Wales, 484.
Gregory XVI., Pope, iv. 282, 283.
Gretser, James, S.J., his correspond
ence with Prior Stuart on Anne of
Denmark's conversion, iii. 347,
450.
Greyson, John, Dominican provincial,
ii. 244 — professes Protestantism,
293.
Grier, John, benefactor of Scotch
College, Pont-a-Mousson, iii. 389.
Grierson, Calam, " notorious Papist, "
iv. 163.
Grig, King, and the Scottish Church,
i. 218.
Grimani, Marco, nuncio to Scotland,
ii. 164.
Grostete, Bishop of Lincoln, i. 364.
Gualteri, Cardinal, protector of Scot
land, iv. 160 note.
INDEX.
445
Guercino, Nicholas, prebendary of
Glasgow, ii. 19.
Guise, Duke of, approves of Spanish
expedition, iii. 258 — plans the
murder of Queen Elizabeth, 273 —
negotiations of James VI. with,
276.
Gulyne, Cistercian convent at, i. 303.
HACO, murderer of St Magnus of
Kirkwall, i. 263.
Hadden-Rig, Scottish victory at, ii.
156.
Haddington, Cistercian convent at, i.
310, 316.
Halkerton, Sir Thomas, tutor to
Alexander Stuart, ii. 115.
Hamburg, claims supremacy over
Orkney, i. 266.
Hamilton, Archibald, convert to
Catholicism, iii. 232.
Hamilton, Francis, prior of Wiirz-
burg, iii. 333.
Hamilton of Bothwellhaugh, James,
assassin of the Regent Moray, iii.
208 — declared an outlaw, 231.
Hamilton, John, Abbot of Paisley, ii.
181 — becomes Bishop of Dunkeld,
182 — translated to St Andrews,
194 — the Catechism of, 215—
summoned for saying mass, iii. 72
— imprisoned, 73 — baptises James
VI., 104 — consistorial jurisdiction
restored to, 107 — his alleged com
plicity in Darnley's murder, 114
note, 214 note — his action in regard
to Bothwell's divorce, 127, 128 —
declared a traitor, 170 — appre
hended at Dumbarton, 214 — hanged
at Stirling, ib. — his character, 215,
216.
Hamilton, John, rector of Paris
University, iii. 406 — apprehended
and dies in prison, 407.
Hamilton, Patrick, tenets of, ii. 135
—his trial and execution, 136.
Hampton Court, conference at, iii. 378.
Hannay, James, Dean of St Giles',
Edinburgh, iv. 5.
Harding, English Franciscan, pleads
the cause of the anti-pope in Scot
land, ii. 60.
Harehope, Lazarite house at, i. 303.
Harold, first Bishop of Argyle, i. 337.
Harrison, William, appointed arch-
priest for England, iii. 423 —
faculties granted to, ib. note — his
death, 433.
Harrison, alias Hatmaker, William,
missionary in Scotland, iv. 402.
Hay, Edmund, S.J., iii. 58, 59 —
declared an outlaw, 231 — on the
Scottish mission, 339.
Hay, George, preacher, iii. 53 — his
controversy with Abbot Kennedy,
54— and with Father Gordon, 341.
Hay, Bishop George, birth and edu
cation of, iv. 212— at the battle of
Prestonpans, 213 — imprisoned in
London, ib. — his conversion, 214 —
ordained priest, 215 — on the Scot
tish mission, ib. — consecrated bishop,
217 — his labours in Scotland, 218
— his efforts on behalf of the Cath
olics of Uist, 219 — recovers the
Scotch church property in France,
221 — founds seminary at Aquhor-
ties, 223 — his writings, 224 et seq.
— claims the administration of the
property of the ex-Jesuits, 227 —
Catholic statistics furnished by, 229
— destruction of his house by the
mob, 236 — his advice to the Cath
olics, 239 — presents address to
George III., 240 — publishes his
Memorial, 241 — loyalty manifested
by, 247 — consecrates Bishop Alex
ander Macdonald, ib. — his visit to
Rome, 250 — his amendments to the
missionary statutes, ib. — advocates
national superiors for the colleges
abroad, 254, 259 — disapproves of
the Catholic Oath, 257 — employs
emigrant French clergy in Scotland,
267 — his report on the state of the
Church (1804), 269— his death at
Aquhorties, 271.
Hay, John, S.J., missionary in Scot
land, iii. 339 — condition of the
country described by, 369.
Hay, Robert, archbishop-elect of St
Andrews, iii. 216.
Hay of Tallo, accomplice in Darnley's
murder, his execution, iii. 159.
Hebrides. See Isles, Western.
Hegerty, Patrick, Franciscan mission-
44G
INDEX.
ary in Scotland, proposed for the
bishopric of the Isles, iv. 43 — his
reports to Propaganda, 70, 71.
Henderson, William, prior of Domini
cans at Stirling, iii. 232.
Henrietta Maria, queen to Charles I. ,
iii. 428 — articles of her marriage
treaty, 431 — violation of them, 433,
493 ; iv. 10— letter of Pope Urban
VIII. to, 26 — recommends Colin
Campbell to the Holy See, 27—
recommends Clifford as vicar-
apostolic, 40 — her visits to the
Paris Carmelites, 93.
Henry, Abbot of Kelso, at the fourth
Lateran Council, i. 339.
Henry I., King of England, founds
bishopric of Carlisle, i. 297.
Henry II., King, his interference in
Scotch ecclesiastical affairs, i. 279
— his heart presented to Bishop
Gillis, iv. 287.
Henry III., King, objects to the
coronation of Alexander III. , i. 361.
Henry IV., King, detains James I.
twenty years in England, ii. 47.
Henry VIII. , King, his efforts to per
vert James V., ii. 140 — intrigues
with the Scottish nobles, 143 —
declares war against Scotland, 156
— connives at the murder of Car
dinal Beaton, 166.
Henry III., King of France, his bene
fits to English and Scottish Catho
lics, iii. 240.
Henry, Prince, son of David I., i.
308— his death, 309— founder of
Holmcultram, 310.
Hepburn, John, prior of St Andrews,
ii. 116 — co-founder of St Leonard's
College, ib. — candidate for the
primacy, 117.
Hepburn, John, Bishop of Brechin,
iii. 89.
Hepburn, Nicholas, Scotch Franciscan,
in Germany, ii. 343.
Herbert, Bishop of Glasgow, i. 150,
290, 336.
Heriot, Adam, Canon of St Andrews,
ii. 294 — appointed Protestant
preacher at Aberdeen, ib.
Hierarchy, Scottish, extinction of the
ancient, iii. 327 — proposed restor
ation of the, iv. 295 — opinions as
to its advisability, 297 — address to
Pius IX. on the subject, ib. — his
reply, 298 — preliminary negotia
tions on the subject of the, ib. —
arguments against the measure,
299 — reasons in its favour, 300 —
various modes of electing the, 304
— means of support of the, 307 —
erection by Leo XIII. of the, 308
— provisions of his bull, 309, 310
• — public opinion on the act, 311 et
seq. — passivity of Scotch Protes
tants as to the, 315 — legal opinions
on the, ib. — protest of the Scotch
Episcopalians against the, ib. —
effects of the measure on the posi
tion of the Church, 334 — extract
from the bull of restoration (trans
lated), 414 et seq. — list of the
(1653-1890), 422, 423.
Highlands, Catholic statistics of the,
under Queen Anne, iv. 163 — per
secution of Catholics in the, 186 —
erection of vicariate of the, 187 —
disappearance of the first vicar-
apostolic-designate of the, ib. — the
Church in the (1805), 271.
Hilary, Pope, his regulations as to
Easter, i. 134, 135.
Hilda, Abbess of Whitby, i. 133.
Holdelm, St Kentigern at, i. 154.
Holmcultram, Cistercian priory of, i.
310.
Holt, William, S.J., iii. 340.
Holyrood, foundation of, i. 295 — anti-
Catholic riot at, iii. 24 — pillage of
the Chapel-Royal at, 140 — the chapel
fitted up for Anglican service, 383
— burning of the Covenant at, iv.
104 — restoration of the mass at, 135
— sacked by the mob, 138.
Holywood, John of, canon-regular,
ii. 334.
Honorius I., Pope, his letter to King
Edwin, i. 115 — exhorts the Scots
to conform to Rome, 123.
Honorius II., Pope, sends legate to
Scotland, i. 296.
Honorius III., Pope, i. 300, 357, 358.
Hospitallers, Knights, introduced by
David I., i. 303 — their houses in
Scotland, iv. 425.
INDEX.
Hospitals, pre-Reformation, in Scot
land, ii. 135— list of, 417, 418—
unknown in Protestant Scotland
for nearly two centuries, iv. 154.
Howard, Philip, Cardinal, protector
of England, iv. 131, 132.
Hudleston, John, O.S.B. , reconciles
Charles II. to the Church, iv. 103
— his account of the king's last
hours, 353 et scq.
Hugh, bishop - designate of St An
drews, i. 326— disputes as to his
election, 327, 328.
Huntly, George, fourth Earl of, ques
tionable religious policy of, iii. 66
— incurs Queen Mary's displeasure,
67 — attacks Moray at Corrichie, 68
— his defeat and death, ib. — at
tainder of the barons of his house,
69.
Huntly, George, fifth Earl of, iii. 77
— Bothwell married to his sister,
126 — witnesses Queen Mary's mar
riage to Bothwell, 132.
Huntly, George, sixth Earl of, iii.
313 — commendator of Dunfermline,
318— at the battle of Glenlivat, 322
— quits Scotland, 323 — signs the
Confession, 354 — tergiversation of,
403, 405 — ordered to make inquisi
tion for Catholics, iv. 12 — his edi
fying death, 29 — buried in Elgin
Cathedral, ib.
Huseman, John, nuncio to Scotland,
ii. 93.
Hussites, mission to Scotland from
the, ii. 55.
Hy. See lona.
INCHAFFRAY, canons-regular at, i. 332
— Maurice, Abbot of, at Bannock-
burn, ii. 25.
Inchcolm, i. 285 — priory of canons-
regular, 286 ; ii. 50 — Archbishop
Graham confined at, 94 — chapel on,
351.
Indulf, King of Scotland, i. 222.
Ingelram, Bishop of Glasgow, at the
Synod of Norham, i. 315 — conse
crated by Pope Alexander, iii.
336.
Inncs, Cosmo, on the medieval Church
of Scotland, Rioted, ii. 410.
Innes, John de, Bishop of Moray, ii.
68 — founds Franciscan convent at
Elgin, 98.
Innes, Louis, charged with Jansenism,
iv. 206, 409, 410.
Innes, Thomas, on the destruction of
Scottish records, quoted, i. 31 —
charged with Jansenism, iv. 206,
210, 410.
Innocent II., Pope, acknowledged by
the king and clergy of Scotland, i.
297.
Innocent III., Pope, proclaims a
crusade, i. 332 — holds the fourth
Lateran Council, 339.
Innocent IV., Pope, his agreement
with King Alexander II., i. 352 —
institutes "Peter's pence," 355 —
his correspondence with King Henry
III., 361.
Innocent VIII., Pope, sends the Golden
Rose to James VI., ii. 77 — asked
to canonise Queen Margaret, 98 —
confers primatial rank on St An
drews, 108 — raises Glasgow to an
archbishopric, 110.
Innocent XII., Pope, privileges
granted to the Scotch College, Paris,
by, iv. 145 — appoints first vicar-
apostolic for Scotland, 146 — his in
terest in Scotland, 367, 370.
Innrechtach, Abbot of lona, i. 214.
Interdict, Scotland under, ii. 162.
lolan, Bishop of Kingarth, i. 145.
lona, landing of St Columba at, i. 63
— Protestant writers on, 64 —
granted to St Columba, 66 — the
cloister life of, 91 et seq. — its pre
eminence over other Columban
houses, 109 — arrival of Angles at,
114 — schism at, on the Easter
question, 147 — adoption of the
Roman rite at, ib. — an anchorite
abbot of, 206 — its abbots termed
co-curbs, 207 — end of the schism at,
208 — removal of St Columba 's relics
from, 211 — they are brought back
to, 212 — becomes subject to Ar
magh, 218 — attacked by the Danes,
209, 213, 226 — restored by St
Margaret, 253 — and by Somerled,
334 — foundation of Cluniac mon
astery at, 334 — becomes an epis-
INDEX.
copal see, ii. 69 — canonesses-regular
at, iv. 425.
Ireland, pilgrims to Whithorn from,
i. 10 — monachism in, 38 — St Col-
umba's foundations in, 41, 79 —
character of the early monasteries
of, 43 — state of, in the time of St
Columba, 48 — reciprocal rights of
church and tribe in, 52 — love of St
Columba for, 77 — sends missionaries
to Scotland, iv. 65 — immigration
to Glasgow from, 292.
Irish Church, connected with that of
the Southern Picts, i. 26 — episcopal
period of the, 35 — monastic period,
38 — monachism in the, derived
from Scotland, 38 — and from Wales,
40.
Irish saints, three orders of early, i.
33 — their tonsure, 37.
Irvin, John, procurator of Scotch
mission at Paris, iv. 150 — his re
port to Rome (translated), 367 et
seq.
Irvine of Drum, converted by Father
Walker, iv. 123.
Irving, John, his letter to Pope
Gregory XIII., iii. 241.
Isabella of Scotland, married to the
Duke of Brittany, ii. 51.
Isles, Western, occupied by Vikings,
i. 217 — annexed to Scotland, 362
— division of the diocese of the, ii.
69 — succession of bishops of the,
428 — Patrick Hegerty proposed as
Bishop of. the, iv. 42 — Lazarist
missionaries in the, 83 — report of
Cardinal Rospigliosi on the, 85 —
mission of the, intrusted to Arch
bishop of Armagh, 86 — -visited by
Bishop Nicolson, 151 — Catholic
statistics of the, under Queen Anne,
163 — restoration of the bishopric
of the, 310 — Nicolson's report of
his visit to the, 371 et seq.
JACOBITES, first rising of the, iv. 165
— its results, ib. — the second, 190,
191.
James I., King of Scotland, ii. 44 —
his marriage, 47 — effect of his
English training, ib. — his religious
zeal, 51 — urges the reform of the
monasteries, ib. — murdered by his
nobles, 53 — founder of Charter
house at Perth, 97.
James II., King, accession and cor
onation of, ii. 70 — his marriage to
Mary of Gueldres, 72 — death of,
73 — his charter to Glasgow Uni
versity, 87.
James III., King, crowned at Kelso,
ii. 74 — married to Margaret of
Denmark, ib. — receives the Golden
Rose from the Pope, 77 — at the
battle of Sauchie, ii.— his assassina
tion, 78 — state of the Scottish
Church under, 98 — his connection
with St Fillan's crosier, 365.
James IV., King, his accession, ii. 99
— married to Margaret of England,
100— his character, 101— killed at
Flodden, 102 — founder of convent
at Stirling, 132.
James V., King, crowned at Scone,
ii. 103 — his action towards Luther-
anism, 134 — founds the College of
Justice, 138 — his attachment to
Catholicism, 139, 140 — Papal
favours bestowed on him, 141 —
marries (1) Magdalen of France,
142 ; (2) Mary of Guise, 153— de
feated by the English at Solway
Moss, 157 — his death, ib. — col
legiate churches founded by, 415.
James VI., King, birth of, iii. 103 —
baptised a Catholic, 104 — crowned
at Stirling, 146 — letter of Pope
Gregory XIII. to, 245 — influence
of D'Aubigny with, 248— signs the
" King's Confession," 250 — his at
titude towards Catholicism, 254,
275, 462 — carried off to Stirling by
Gowrie, 257 — corresponds with the
Guises, 276 — writes to Pope
Gregory, 279 — his behaviour to
wards his mother, 309 — his con
duct after her execution, 312 — won
over by Queen Elizabeth, 315 —
married to Anne of Denmark, 346
— establishes Episcopacy in Scot
land, 362 — publishes the Basilikon
Doron, 363 — succeeds to the crown
of England, 373 — his coronation at
Westminster, ib. — his church policy
in Scotland, 375 et seq. — forbids
INDEX.
449
the General Assembly to meet, 376
— summons a conference at Hamp
ton Court, 378 — restores the autho
rity of the episcopate, 379 — his
solicitude for the Episcopal Church,
381— revisits Scotland, 382— his
dispute with the ministers, 384 —
congratulated by Pope Clement
VIII. , 393, 394— his reply, 395— his
disposition towards Catholics, 396,
462— letter from Pope Paul V. to,
419, 477 — defends the oath of
allegiance, 420 — negotiates his son's
marriage, 424 et seq. — his death,
439 — contemporary estimate of his
character, 497 — church patronage
under, 319, 320.
James VII. (II.), King, conversion of,
iv. 95 — feeling among English
Protestants against him, 108 — in
sulted in Edinburgh, 109 — Winster
at the Court of, 1 1 5 — his accession
to the throne, 134— his marriage
to Mary Beatrix, ib. — publishes
edict of toleration, ib. — restores the
mass at Holyrood, 135 — his en
croachment on Church rights, 136
— forced to abdicate, 137 — defeated
at the Boyne, ib, — his death, 139.
James Francis, Prince, recommends
Wallace and Macdonald for bishop
rics, iv. 183, 189 note — his privilege
of nominating a cardinal, 184 note.
James, papal legate, i. 340.
Jameson, John Paul, professor of
theology at Padua, iv. 124.
Jansenism, spread of, in Scotland,
iv. 200 — papal briefs against, ib. —
formula of the vicars-apostolic cen
suring, 202 — strong measures of
Pope Clement XII. against, 203—
the Scotch College at Paris infected
with, 204 — report of Lercari as to,
205 et seq. — fresh papal condemna
tion of, 208 — text of Lercari's
report on (translated), 408 et seq.
Jedburgh, monastery of, i. 301 —
Abbot of, envoy to England, ii. 3 —
burned by the English, 169 —
Methven appointed preacher at,
294.
Jesuits, the, on the Scotch mission,
iii. 253 — sent on a mission to Spain
VOL. IV.
and Rome, 258 — results of their
labours, 260 — proscribed by James
VI., 319 — their work as mission
aries, 336 et seq. ; iv. 126, 127
— their relations with the bishops,
196 — suppressed by Pope Clement
XIV., 226 — their property in Scot
land, 227 — brought back by Bishop
Gillis, 291.
Joan of England, queen to Alexander
II. , i. 339, 360.
Joan of England, queen to James I.,
ii. 47 — remarried to Stewart of
Lorn, 70.
Joceliii, Bishop of Glasgow, i. 319,
336.
Jocelyn of Furness, biographer of
St Kentigern, i. 150 — his account
of the saint's death, 156.
John, Bishop of Caithness, murdered
by the Earl of Orkney, i. 338.
John, Bishop of Dunkeld, i. 337—
enters the Cistercian order, 338.
John, Bishop of Glasgow, i. 280, 289,
297.
John of Salerno, Cardinal, legate in
Scotland, i. 330.
John IV., Pope, his letter to the
Irish Church, i. 125.
John XXII., Pope, sends legates to
Scotland, ii. 13 — his decree as to
coronation of Scottish kings, 15 —
opposes the royal claims, 19 —
petition of King Edward II. to,
22.
Joleta, queen to Alexander III., i.
372.
Jop, Peter, his petition to the Privy
Council, iv. 35.
Julius of Caerlyon, early British
martyr, i. 4.
Julius II., Pope, sends an envoy to
Scotland, ii. 101 — bestows dignities
on Alexander Stuart, 115.
Juvenale, Latino, nuncio to Scotland,
ii. 154 — instructions to, 413.
KALEXDARS of the Scottish Saints,
Forbes's, ii. 408.
Keillor, burned at Edinburgh, ii.
144.
Keith, Lady Mary, iv. 162.
Keledei. See Culdees.
2 F
450
INDEX.
Kells, the Book of, i. 106; ii. 361 —
becomes the head of the Columban
monasteries, i. 210.
Kelso, monastery of, i. 301 — burned
by the English, ii. 169 — its archi
tecture, 388.
Kennedy, James, Bishop of St An
drews, ii. 71 — his virtues, 72, 95 —
founds St Salvator's College, 86 —
his death, 95.
Kennedy, burned at Glasgow, ii. 144.
Kennedy, Quintin, last Abbot of
Crossraguel, ii. 253 — his Com
pendious Tractive, 254 — his con
troversy with Willock, 260 — with
Knox, iii. 54 — his death, 55.
Kenneth MacAlpine, King, i. 215.
Kenneth II., King, founder of
Brechin, i. 225 — acquires Lothian
and Cumbria, 228, 229.
Kentigern, Apostle of Cumbria, i.
149 — his biographers, ib. — his
birth, 150 — becomes Bishop of
Glasgow, 152 — goes to Menevia
in Wales, 153 — returns to Strath -
clyde, 154 — his labours among the
Picts, 155 — his meeting with St
Columba, ib. — his death, 156 — his
office and mass, ib.
Kerr, Lady, iv. 162.
Kilwinning, sack of the abbey of, ii.
276 — demolition of, iii. 15.
King's College, Aberdeen, "reforma
tion " of, iii. 204.
Kingston, Bishop Macdonell of, iv.
272 note.
Kinloss, Cistercian monastery of, i.
302 — foundation of Culross from,
356.
Kirkaldy of Grange, his letter on the
doings of the Congregation, ii. 278
— intrigues against Queen Mary, iii.
86 — his perfidy towards her, 137 —
abandons Moray, 206 — his conten
tion with Knox, 224.
Kirkinner, church of, ii. 80.
Kirkmaiden, sanctuary of St Edana,
i. 30.
Kirk-of-Field, collegiate church of,
ii. 415 — murder of Darnley at, iii.
114.
Kirk-sessions, anti-Catholic action of,
iii. 237.
Kirk wall, cathedral of, i. 263— relics
of St Magnus at, 265, 266— burial
of the ' ' Maid of Norway " at, ii. 6
— restored by Bishop Reid, 197 —
erection of chapter of, 419.
Knox, John, parentage and educa
tion of, ii. 188 — his call to the
ministry, 189 — imprisoned in
France, 190 — offered an Anglican
bishopric, 221 — goes to Geneva,
222 — pastor at Frankfort, ib. —
returns to Scotland, 223 — proceed
ings taken against him, 225 — his
letter to the queen-regent, 226 — •
again retires to Geneva, 227 — con
demned by the Church courts, 228
— his "Appellation," ib. — re
appears in Scotland, 263 — preaches
in Perth, 265 — incites the ' ' rascal
multitude," 266 — claims to depose
the Regent, 277 — his inconsistency,
278 — his relations with Queen
Elizabeth, 279 — envoy from the
Congregation to the English Gov
ernment, 280 — his aspersions on
the Regent, 288 — charges against
his character, ib. note — appointed
preacher at Edinburgh, 294 — his
violent behaviour, iii. 26 — his con
ference with Queen Mary, ib. —
disputes with Abbot Kennedy, 54
— his pulpit invectives, 70, 87 —
marries Margaret Stewart, 78 —
his flight from Edinburgh, 99 —
his probable complicity in Rizzio's
murder, 100 — preaches at corona
tion of James VI., 147 — his re
markable letter to Cecil, 207 —
protests against pluralities, 222 —
quarrels with Kirkaldy, 224 —
his controversy with Father Tyrie,
225 — his continued hostility to
Queen Mary, 226— his death, 227
— his character, ib. et seq.
Knox, Thomas F., on the projected
assassination of Queen Elizabeth,
quoted, iii. 275.
Kyle, James, Bishop, his arguments
against the restoration of the Scot
tish hierarchy, iv. 299.
LADIES, persecution of Scotch Cath
olic, iv. 21.
INDEX.
451
Laing, Bishop of Glasgow, ii. 98.
Laisren, Abbot of lona, i. 111.
Lamberton, William, Bishop of Glas
gow, ii. 21, 22, 23.
Landel, William de, Bishop of St
Andrews, ii. 30.
Lanfranc, Archbishop of Canterbury,
condemns abuses in Irish Church, i.
103 — his esteem for St Margaret,
245 — recognises the supremacy of
York over the Scottish Church,
254.
Langay, John, biographer of Beza,
iii. 333.
Langside, defeat of Queen Mary at,
iii. 163.
Laud, Anglican Archbishop of Can
terbury, accompanies James VI. to
Scotland, iii. 384 — arraigned for
treason, iv. 7.
Lander, Thomas, Bishop of Dunkeld,
ii. 113.
Laurence, Archbishop of Canterbury,
on the Easter reckoning, i. 111.
Laureo, Bishop of Mendovi, papal
nuncio to Scotland, iii. 94 — failure
of his mission, 95 — Bishop Leslie's
account of, 448.
Law, John, Scotch financier in France,
mentioned in Lercari's report, iv.
411.
Lawder, Archdeacon of Lothian, Scot
tish envoy to France, ii. 44.
Laynez, Genera] of the Jesuits, re
port of Goudanus to, iii. 58 — his
pupil converts Anne of Denmark,
347.
Lazarist missionaries in Scotland, iv.
83.
Lazarus, St, military order of, intro
duced by David I., i. 303.
Lecky, historian, on the ascendancy
of the ministers, quoted, iv. 153 —
on the tyranny of the Kirk, 264.
Lennox, Matthew, Earl of, father of
Darnley, iii. 110, 115— at the West
minster Conference, 188 — chosen
Regent, 212— killed at Stirling, 217.
Lennox, Esme" Stuart, Earl of. See
D'Aubigny.
Lent, the Celtic, i. 246.
Leo I., Pope St, his regulations as to
Easter, i. 134.
Leo X., Pope, ii. 103.
Leo XII. , Pope, divides Scotland into
three vicariates, iv. 275.
Leo XIII. , Pope, restores the hierarchy
in Scotland, iv. 308 — announces the
event to the cardinals, 311 — erects
the abbey of Fort- Augustus, 336 —
his brief Romanes Pontifices, 336,
337.
Lercari, Niccol6, nuncio at Paris, iv.
205 — his report on the spread of
Jansenism, 205 et seq. — recommen
dations of, 207 — result of his repre
sentations, 208 — text of his report
(translated), 408 el seq.
Leslie, Alexander, papal visitor to the
Scottish mission, iv. 128 — his report,
ib. — measures recommended by, 129
—result of his visitation, 130 — text
of his report and suggestions (trans
lated), 356 et seq.
Leslie, Archangel, iii. 410 note ; iv.
37 — Rinuccini's life of, 75 — enters
the Capuchin order, 76 — arrives on
the Scottish mission, 77 — goes to
Rome, 78 — his own account of
his labours, ib. — his death, 80.
Leslie, John, parson of Murthlach, ii.
239 — official of Aberdeen, iii. 13—
his mission to Queen Mary, 20 —
accompanies her to Scotland, 22 —
honours bestowed on him, 92 — be
comes Bishop of Ross, ib. — declared
a traitor, 170 — commissioner of
Mary at the York Conference, 171
— imprudent conduct of, 196 — pro
tests against surrender of Mary to
Moray, 208 — his correspondence
with Pope Gregory XIII., 240 —
receives benefice from Henry III.
of France, ib. — his negotiations on
behalf of Mary, 241 — his zeal for
the faith, 247 — restored by James
VI., 313 — imprisoned in the tower
of London, 324 — named Bishop of
Coutances, 325 — his death, ib. —
list of his writings, ib. note — his
account of the mission of Bishop
Laureo, 448.
Leslie, John, S.J., missionary in Scot
land, iv. 58.
Leslie, William, professor of theology
at Padua, iv. 125 — becomes Prince-
452
INDEX.
Bishop of Laybach, ib. — a bene
factor of the Scotch College, Rome,
ib.
Lesmahago, Benedictine priory of, i.
301.
Lethington. See Maitland.
Lex Innocentium, the, i. 145 — revived
in Ireland, 206.
Lichton, Henry de, Bishop of Moray,
ii. 68.
Lignerolles, French envoy to Scot
land, Hi. 150.
Lincluden, Benedictine convent of, i.
303 note ; iv. 425 — refounded as a
collegiate church, ii. 416.
Lindisfarne, episcopal seat of St
Aidan, i. 118 — seminary at, 120
— St Cuthbert prior of, 152 — be
comes his episcopal see, 166 — ex
tent of the diocese, 173 — the Gos
pels of, ii. 361.
LincVores, Benedictine abbey of, i.
332— Laurence of, ii. 54, 56, 58
— the abbey twice sacked, 173,
271.
Lindsay, Sir David, effect of his play,
"The Three Estates," ii. 160 —
his talents as poet and dramatist,
345.
Lindsay, Epiphanius, missionary in
Scotland, iv. 73 — condemned to
death and banished, ib. — becomes
a Capuchin, 74 — letter from, 75 —
his death, 76.
Lindsay, James, convert to Catholi
cism, iii. 345.
Lindsay, Jerome, Superior of Fran
ciscans at Perth, ii. 97.
Lindsay, John of, Bishop of Glasgow,
ii. 19, 23— his flight and death,
30, 31.
Lindsay, Patrick, Lord, conspires to
murder Rizzio, iii. 96 — pardoned
by Queen Mary, 1 05 — escorts Mary
to Lochleven, 139 — compels her to
abdicate, 142 — his perjury, 146 —
one of Moray's commissioners at
York, 171.
Linlithgow, Countess of, governess of
Princess Elizabeth, i. 15; iii. 454
— chapel of the Knights of the
Thistle at, ii. 415— Lazarite house
at, i. 303.
Linse, Leo, first Abbot of Fort- Augus
tus, iv. 336 note.
Linton, Lord, his efforts for the relief
of Scottish Catholics, iv. 241.
Lismore, cathedral at, i. 337 — semin
ary of, transferred to Blairs, iv.
281.
Liturgy, Scoto-Celtic, ii. 391 et seq. —
medieval, 404 et seq.
Lochleven, Culdees of, i. 222, 237,
239, 255 — death of Archbishop
Graham at, ii. 94 — Queen Mary
confined at, iii. 139 — visit of
Moray to, 151 — escape of Mary
from, 161.
Loch Tay, priory of canons-regular
at, i. 286.
Logic, Gavin, President of St Leon
ard's College, ii. 148.
Logic, Robert, Canon of Cambusken-
neth, ii. 148.
Lollardism, spread of, in Scotland, ii.
55 — legislation against, ib. — pro
ceedings against its adherents,
111.
London, Scottish prelates at the synod
of, i. 366 — No-Popery riots in, iv.
244, 245.
Lords of the Articles, instituted by
James I., ii. 48.
Lothian, evangelised by St Cuthbert,
i. 157 — its cession to Scotland,
228.
Louis of Anjou, married to Princess
Margaret of Scotland, ii. 50.
Louis XII., King of France, a bene
factor of the Scottish mission, iv.
119.
Louis XIV., King, consulted by
Charles II. on a question of con
science, iv. 95.
Louis XV., King, restores the Scotch
property in France to the bishops,
iv. 221.
Louvain, address to Cardinal Beaton
from the university of, ii. 136 —
Ninian Winzet at, iii. 51, 53 note
—Scotch College at, 389, 390—
transferred to Douai, 391 — opinion
of the university of, as to the
Pope's dispensing power, iv. 257.
Lucina, St, identical with Pomponia
Grsecina, i. 2.
INDEX.
453
Lucius II., Pope, confirms foundation
of priory of St Andrews, i. 299.
Lucius III., Pope, removes interdict
from St Andrews, i. 326.
Lumsden, Thomas, Lazarist mission
ary in Scotland, iv. 83, 349.
Luna, Peter de, anti - pope. See
Benedict XIII.
Lutheranism, introduced into Scot
land, ii. 134 — spread of, 137.
Lydell, Patrick, Scottish envoy to the
Pope, ii. 180, 181.
Lynch, James, coadjutor -bishop of
the Western district, iv. 293 —
appointed to Kildare and Leighlin,
294.
Lyons, General Council of, i. 367.
M'ALPiNE, John, Protestant pro
fessor, ii. 147.
MacAlpine, Kenneth. See Kenneth.
Macaulay, Lord, on Neville Payne,
iv. 141 note — in favour of Catholic
emancipation, 277.
Macbeth, King of Scotland, i. 237.
Macdonald, Alexander, Highland
vicar-apostolic, iv. 247 — his death,
261.
Macdonald, Alan, missionary in Scot
land, iv. 401 — imprisoned and ban
ished, 402 note.
Macdonald, Angus, appointed Bishop
of Argyle and the Isles, iv. 311.
Macdonald, Hugh, first Highland
vicar - apostolic, iv. 188 — conse
crated at Paris, 189 — disapproves
the rising of 1745, 190— blesses
the royal standard at Glenfinnan,
191 — his apprehension and trial,
193 — his death, 194 — Lercari's
opinion of him, 208 — text of his
reports to Propaganda (translated),
388, 392, 405.
Macdonald, John, Highland vicar-
apostolic, iv. 247.
Macdonald, John, Northern vicar-
apostolic, iv. 291 — assists at the
Vatican Council, ib. — translated to
Aberdeen, 311.
Macdonald, Ranald, Highland vicar-
apostolic, iv. 272.
Macdonell, Alexander, his devotion
to the Catholic Highlanders, iv.
272 — becomes first Bishop of King
ston, ib.
Macgill, James, assistant - commis
sioner at the York Conference, iii.
172.
MacGillis, Angus, missionary in Scot
land, iv. 402.
Machar's, St, cathedral of Aberdeen,
i. 292 — destruction of images at,
iv. 30.
Machut, St, churches dedicated to,
i. 83.
Maclachlan, John, appointed Bishop
of Galloway, iv. 410.
Maclauchlan, Angus, missionary in
Scotland, iv. 402.
Macleans, apostasy of the chief of the,
iv. 373.
Macpherson, Father Paul, his report
to Propaganda (1835), iv. 284.
MacQuarry (MacWhirrie), Alexander,
S.J., preserves the arm of St Nin-
ian, i. 14 — on the Scottish mission,
iii. 318 note.
Macrae, Mr, and the Westminster
Confession, iv. 330 et seq.
Madrid, Scotch College at, iv. 57 —
interest of the King of Spain in,
ib. — transferred to Valladolid, 58
— in need of reform, 121.
Maelduin, Bishopof St Andrews, i. 239.
Maelrubha, founder of Applecross, i.
142.
Magdalen of France, queen to James
V., ii. 142.
Magnus, St, murdered by Haco, i.
263 — dedication of Kirkwall Cathe
dral in his honour, ib. — his relics
brought thither from Birsay, 265.
Mair (Major), John, Provost of St
Salvator's, ii. 147, 342.
Maitland of Lethington, Speaker of
the Parliament of 1560, ii. 299 —
and the Confession of Faith, iii. 3
— conspires to murder Darnley, 112
— his perfidy towards Queen Mary,
138 — frames act of accusation
against her, 155 — assistant-com
missioner of Moray at York, 171
— abandons Moray, 206.
Malachy, St, Archbishop of Armagh,
visits Prince Henry of Scotland, i.
309.
454
INDEX.
Malcolm L, King of Scotland, i.
222.
Malcolm II. , King, i. 230, 291.
Malcolm III. (Canmore), King, i. 238
— marries St Margaret, 241 — his
reign a time of transition, 258 — his
death, 259.
Malcolm IV. (the Maiden), King, i.
314 — his monastic foundations, 316
— his death, 317.
Malisius, Bishop of St Andrews, i.
223.
Malvaria, papal nuncio, his report on
the state of Scotland, iii. 355 —
text of his report (translated), 460
et seq.
Malvoisin, Bishop of St Andrews, i.
331, 336, 358.
Mambrecht, James, S.J. , missionary
in Scotland, iv. 62 — his description
of the state of the country, ib. —
imprisoned at Edinburgh, 64 — ban
ished, ib.
Mambrecht, John, S.J., missionary in
Scotland, iv. 61 — imprisoned and
sentenced to death, ib. — banished,
ib. — dies at Warsaw, 62.
Man, early history of, i. 268 — ecclesi
astical changes in, 306 — suffragan
see to Drontheim, 371 — supports
the anti-pope, ii. 42 — division of
the see of, ib.
Mancini, Bishop Ottavio. See Car-
pentras.
Manning, Archbishop, appointed apos
tolic visitor of the Western District,
iv. 293 — his report, 294 — advocates
the restoration of the hierarchy,
297 — assistance given by him to the
measure, 299.
Mansfield, Earl of, friendly to the
Catholics, iv. 244.
Manuel, Cistercian convent at, i. 316.
Manuscripts, early Celtic, ii. 357 —
peculiarities of, 362.
Mar, John, Earl of, chosen Regent,
iii. 217 — sanctions plot against
Queen Mary's life, 218 — his death,
ib.
Marcfoschi, Cardinal, protector of
the Scotch College at Rome, iv.
253.
Marcus, Bishop of Man, i. 371.
Margaret, St, married to Malcolm
III., i. 241 — her character and in
fluence, 242, 243 — her zeal for re
form, 245 — protector of anchorites,
251— her interest in lona, 253 —
her death and canonisation, 261 —
her relics, ib. note — their transla
tion and enshrinement at Dunferm-
line, 363 — convent at Edinburgh
dedicated to, iv. 282 — devotion of
Pius IX. to, 298.
Margaret of England, queen to Alex
ander III., i. 372.
Margaret, Maid of Norway, ii. 1 — her
death, 6.
Margaret Logy, queen to David II.,
divorced by him, ii. 27.
Margaret of Denmark, queen to James
III., ii. 74 — her death, 76 — pro
posed canonisation of, 98.
Margaret of England, queen to James
IV., ii. 100 — remarried (1) to Earl
of Angus, 106; (2) to Henry Stuart,
ib.
Marist Fathers, brought to Scotland
by Bishop Gillis, iv. 291.
Marjory, queen to Robert Bruce, ii.
17.
Markinch, church of, i. 239.
Marriage customs, reformed by St
Margaret, i. 251.
Marston Moor, battle of, iv. 7.
Martin V., Pope, acknowledged by
Scotland, ii. 61.
Martin of Tours, St, visited by
Ninian, i. 8 — Candida Casa dedi
cated to him, 9.
Mary of Gueldres, queen to James II.,
ii. 72 — her courage, 73 — foundress
of Trinity Church, Edinburgh, 415.
Mary of Guise, queen to James V.,
ii. 153 — appointed Regent, 193 —
her tolerance, 234 — change in her
policy, 262 — pretended deposition
of, 277 — her death and character,
287— buried at Rheims, 289.
Mary, Queen of Scots, her accession,
ii. 157 — her marriage with the
Dauphin agreed upon, 192 -
taken to France, ib. — married to
the Dauphin, 197 — becomes Queen
of France, iii. 1 7 — her claims to the
English crown, ib. — quits France,
INDEX.
455
22— arrives in Scotland, 23— frus
tration of her hopes of tolerance,
ib. — her conference with Knox, 26
— her progress through Scotland,
28 — her relations with Rome, 55 —
receives the Golden Rose, 56 — pro
tests against Knox's violence, 71,
76 — opens her first Parliament, 74
— sends an envoy to Rome, 77 — her
marriage to Darnley, 81 — proclaims
toleration, 82 — her letter to Pius
V., 93 — influence of Rizzio with,
96 — intrigues against, 98, 101 —
her flight to Dunbar, 98 — birth
and baptism of her son, 103, 104
— pardons Rizzio's murderers, 105
— restores the primate's jurisdic
tion, 106: — her sentiments towards
Darnley, 111 — her action after his
murder, 115 — suspicions attaching
to, 116 — carried off by Both well,
120 — her own account of his treat
ment of her, 121 et seq. — motive of
her consent to marry him, 125 —
creates him Duke of Orkney, 132 —
married to him at Holyrood, ib. —
her unhappiness, 133, 135 — sur
renders to her enemies at Carberry,
137 — cruel treatment of, 138 — con
fined at Lochleven, 139 — compelled
to sign her abdication, 143 — her
marriage with Bothwell declared
null, 148 — act of council passed
against, 154 — escapes from Loch
leven, 161 — defeated at Langside,
163 — her flight, ib. — arrives at
Carlisle, 165 — Elizabeth refuses to
receive her, 166 — agrees to a con
ference, 168 — her instructions to
her commissioners, 173 — complaints
brought by her before the York
Conference, 174 — documents pro
duced against her, 178 — reasons
against their authenticity, 179 et
seq. — behaviour of Elizabeth to
wards her, 187 — protest of her
commissioners at Westminster, 188
— production of the Book of
Articles and the Casket Letters,
190 et seq. — her energetic action,
197 — refuses to confirm her abdi
cation, 199 — her efforts through
the French ambassador, 201 — plot
for her surrender to Moray, 207 —
and to Mar, 217 — negotiations on
her behalf, 241 — her interest in the
Scotch seminaries, 252, 388 — her
hopes of deliverance, 280 — hard
ships suffered by, 287 — her senti
ments towards Elizabeth, ib. — re
strictions imposed on her, 290 —
how far implicated in the Babing-
ton plot, 291, 297— her deplorable
situation, 295 — writes to Babing-
ton, 301 — authenticity of her letter
discussed, 303 — her trial and con
demnation, 304 — her last hours,
305 — execution of, 306 — interest of
her career, 307 — her claim to the
title of martyr, 308 — James VI. 's
treatment of her, 309 — feeling
caused in Scotland by her death,
312.
Mary Beatrix of Este, queen to James
VII. (II.), iv. 134— married with
out papal dispensation, ib. note.
Mary of Medici, Queen, Archangel
Leslie appointed preacher to, iv. 76.
Mass, punishment of Catholics for
saying or hearing, iii. 398 et seq.,
407; iv. Ill, 114, 142, 143, 166.
Matilda, queen to David I., i. 308.
Maurice, Abbot of Inchaffray, at the
battle of Bannockburn, ii. 25 — ap
pointed Bishop of Dunblane, ib.
Maybole, collegiate church at, ii. 416
— disputation between Knox and
Abbot Kennedy at, iii. 54.
Maxwell, Elspeth, confined in Dum
fries jail for Popery, iv. 28.
Maxwell, Lord, convert to Catholi
cism, iii. 314, 341.
Maxwell, Stephen, superior of Scot
tish Jesuits, iv. 127.
Meldrum, William, precentor of Aber
deen, benefactor of Scotch College,
Pont-a-Mousson, iii. 389.
Melfort, John, Earl of, Scottish Sec
retary of State, iv. 137 — popular
fury against, 138 — escapes to
France, ib.
Melrose (Old), founded by St Aidan,
i. 121 — St Cuthbert at, 159 —
burned by Kenneth MacAlpine,
215.
Melrose, Cistercian abbey of, i. 302
456
INDEX.
— Kinloss and Newbattle founded
from, ib. — burned by the English,
ii. 1 69 — architectural style of, 389.
Melvill, John, charged with painting
a crucifix, iii. 389.
Melville, Andrew, Principal of Glas
gow University, iii. 243 — flies to
England, 357 — his violence at the
Hampton Court Conference, 378 —
his death, 384.
Melville, James, assassin of Cardinal
Beaton, ii. 177.
Melville, Sir Robert, iii. 134 —
charged to procure Queen Mary's
abdication, 142.
Menainville, De, ambassador from
France, iii. 268.
Menevia, founded by St David, i. 40
— St Kentigern at, 153.
Menteath, Robert, converted minis
ter, iv. 68 — becomes a canon of
Notre Dame, Paris, ib.
Menteith, Walter de, Regent, i. 364.
Menzies of Pitfodels, converted by
Father Smith, S.J., iv. 61.
Menzies, John, of Pitfodels, founder
of Blairs College, iv. 281.
Methven, Paul, preacher, ii. 220, 230
— appointed to Jedburgh, 294.
Military orders, introduction of the,
i. 103.
Ministers, Protestant, provision for
the support of, iii. 7, 30, 78.
Mint, the, seized by the Congrega
tion, ii. 273.
Mionna of St Columba, the, i. 214.
Missal, the Arbuthnott, ii. 406.
Missionaries, earliest to Scotland, i.
4- — English, in Scotland, iii. 255 —
their zeal, 256 — Scottish, perse
cuted by the Kirk, iv. 36, 37—
number of (1663), 49 — Irish, in
Scotland, 65 — society of Protes
tant, 166 — their number in 1703,
178 — relation to the bishops of the
regular, 197 — ordered to subscribe
formula against Jansenism, 203 —
Government grant to, 256 — grow
ing respect paid to, 282 — poverty
of the, 284— report of superior of
the Scottish, 344 et seq.
Mobhi, St, teacher of St Columba, i.
57.
Modan, St, i. 29 — his oratory on Loch
Etive, ib. — when commemorated,
205.
Moderates, rise of the party so called,
iv. 321 — failure of their church
policy, 323.
Moffat, James, S.J. , missionary in
Scotland, iii. 413 — banished, 414.
Moluag of Lismore, St, his staff, ii.
367.
Monachism, Irish, whence derived, i.
38, 40.
Monasteries, early Irish, i. 38, 40 —
founded by St Columba, their
character, 43 — number of monks,
45 — their organisation and in
fluence, 46 — their privilege of
sanctuary, 49 — their abbots, 50 —
life in the Columban, 91 et seq.
— result of the abolition of, iii. 318
— condition of tenants under the,
319 — schools attached to, 327 —
records kept in, 329— remains of
Celtic, 350 — demolition of, ordered
by General Assembly, iii. 15 — the
Scoto - German, 246, 247 note —
supply of missionaries to Scotland
from, 392 — scholars reared by,
ii.— relaxation of discipline in, iv.
82 — list of pre-Reformation, 424.
Monenna, St, legend of, i. 29.
Montalcmbert, portrait of St Columba
drawn by, i. 189.
Montecuculi, Tuscan ambassador, his
testimony to the conversion of
Anne of Denmark, iii. 349.
Monuments, sculptured, in Scotland,
ii. 373 — ornamentation of, 375 —
symbolic representations on, 379 —
inscribed, 383— Runic, 385.
Monymusk, Culdees of, i. 358 —
preservation of the Jirecbennoch at,
ii. 373.
Moran, Cardinal, on the origin of
the name of Edinburgh, quoted,
i. 29.
Moray, foundation of see of, i. 283 —
succession of bishops of, ii. 428.
Moray, Gilbert de, i. 293, 359.
Moray, James Stuart, Earl of, joins
the Protestants, ii. 269 — charged
with the demolition of monasteries,
iii. 15 — his mission to Queen Mary,
INDEX.
457
21 —created Earl of Moray, 68 —
defeats Huntly at Corrichie, ib. — -
intrigues against Mary, 84, 134,
149 — concerned in Rizzio's murder,
96 — and in Darnley's, 113 — in
communication with French Prot
estants, 149 — visits Mary at
Lochleven, 150 — proclaimed Re
gent, 151 — public feeling against,
159 — his negotiations with England
and France, 160 — at the York
Conference, 171 — at the West
minster Conference, 188 — anti-
Catholic zeal of, 203 — burns
witches, 205 — loses his supporters,
206 — his plan to recover Mary's
person, 207 — shot by Hamilton of
Bothwellhaugh, 208 — his character,
209 — state of Scotland at his death,
211.
Morgan, Thomas, Queen Mary's agent
in Paris, iii. 293 — letter from Mary
to, 301 note.
Mortlach, foundation of church of, i.
232, 291.
Morton, James, fourth Earl of, con
spires to murder Rizzio, iii. 96 —
and Darnley, 112 — one of Moray's
commissioners at York, 171 — ap
proves plot against Queen Mary's
life, 218 — elected Regent, 219—
favours Episcopalianism,z'6. — his at
titude towards the Catholic clergy,
222, 223 — his epigram on Knox,
227 — execution of the penal laws
under, 230 — forced to resign, 242
— arrest and execution of, 251.
Morton, John, S.J., iii. 342 — anec
dote of James VI. and, 349 note.
Mowbray, Geoffrey de, envoy to
England, ii. 3.
Muck, island of, inhabited by Catho
lics, iv. 163.
Mugint, St, at Whithorn, i. 10 — his
prayer, ib.
Muintir, designation of the Irish
monasteries, i. 46.
Mull, persecution of Catholics in, iv.
384.
Mungo, St. See Kentigern.
Mimro, Robert, missionary in Scot
land, iv. 126 — his imprisonment
and death at Glengarry, ib.
Murdoch, Father, punished for saying
mass, iii. 400.
Murdoch, John, Western vicar-apos
tolic, iv. 293 — charged with favour
itism, ib.
Murdoch, William, S.J., missionary
in Scotland, iii. 342.
Musselburgh, diocesan synod of St
Andrews held at, i. 352.
Mylne, Alexander, Abbot of Cambus-
kenneth, ii. 117 — first president of
the College of Justice, 139.
Mylne, Walter, tried for heresy, ii.
235 — burned at St Andrews, 236.
Myrten, Patrick, treasurer of Aber
deen, his disputation at Edinburgh,
iii. 13.
NAPOLEOX, attitude of England to
wards, iv. 266.
Nathalan, early Aberdeenshire saint,
i. 143.
Nau, Claude, secretary of Queen Mary,
his testimony to Moray's intrigues,
iii. 101, 113 — on the supposed at
tempt to poison Mary, 104 note —
on Mary's visit to Bothwell, 192.
Nectan, Bishop of Aberdeen, i. 291.
Nectan (Naiton), King of the Picts,
supposed founder of Abernethy, i.
26, 82 — adopts the Roman Easter,
147 — expels the Columban monks,
148 — enters the ecclesiastical state,
179 — his death and burial at lona,
ib.
Neville, George, Archbishop of York,
protests against the erection of St
Andrews into an archbishopric, ii.
90.
New Abbey. See Sweetheart.
Newbattle, Cistercian monastery of,
i. 302.
Newspaper press, the, on the restora
tion of the Scottish hierarchy, iv.
311 et seq.
Nicholas III., Pope, ii. 20.
Nicholas V., Pope, founds Glasgow
University, ii. 86.
Nicholas, Prior, on the claims of York,
i. 280.
Nicol, James, missionary in Scotland,
imprisoned, iv. 126.
Nicolson, Thomas, first Scottish vicar-
458
INDEX.
apostolic, iv. 146 — consecrated at
Paris, 147 — imprisoned in England,
148 — his letter to Propaganda, ib.
— his first report from Scotland,
149 — number of his clergy, 151 —
visits the Highlands and Islands,
ib. — his report on the severity of
the penal laws, 159 — zeal of, 168
— his missionary statutes, 168 et
serj. — founds seminary at Seal an,
174 — his second visitation of the
Highlands, 177 — proposes a chapter
for Scotland, 178 — his death and
character, 182 — text of his reports
to Propaganda (translated), 364,
371.
Ninian, St, his birth, i. 6 — studies in
Rome, 7 — his consecration and re
turn to Scotland, 8 — erects the
Candida Cam, 9 — his austerities,
10 — his death, 11 — devotion to
him, 14 — his relics, ib. — Bishop
Forbes on, 15.
Nithsdale, Earl of, ordered to have
his son educated a Protestant, iv.
17, 24.
Norfolk, Thomas, Duke of, commis
sioner of Queen Elizabeth at York,
iii. 172.
Norham, synod of, i. 315.
Norrie, Duncan, regent of King's
College, Aberdeen, deprived for
Popery, iii. 204.
Northallerton, battle of the Standard
at, i. 288.
Northampton, council of, i. 319 —
treaty of, ii. 15.
Northumbria, conversion of first king
of, i. 115 — Scottish missionaries to,
116 — St Aidan, first bishop in, 118
— decline of the kingdom of, 127
— end of the Columban Church in,
140— visit of Adamnan to, 144 —
changes in the church of, 164 —
decay of religion in, deplored by
Bede, 195 — ravaged by the Danes,
201.
Norwegian power in Scotland, end of
the, i. 231.
Nuns, convents of, founded under
David I., i. 303 — re-established in
Scotland by Bishop Gillis, iv. 281,
282.
OATH OF ALLEOIANCE, condemned by
Pope Paul V., iii. 421 — form of,
proposed by Pitt, iv. 256 — con
demned by the Scottish vicars-
apostolic, 257.
O'Brolchan, Abbot of Derry, placed
over lona, i. 334.
Ochiltree, Lord, his daughter married
to Knox, iii. 78 — intrigues against
Queen Mary, 86.
O'Connell, Daniel, ascendancy ac
quired by, iv. 276.
Ogham inscriptions, ii. 384.
Ogilvie, Alexander, S.J., iv. 64 —
imprisoned and banished for the
faith, 65.
Ogilvie, John, S.J., apprehended, iii.
414 — his examination, 415 — mar
tyrdom of, 417.
Ogilvie, John, S.J., sufferings of,
under Cromwell, iv. 127.
Ogilvie of Craig, Sir John, prosecuted
for Popery, iv. 23, 24.
Ogilvie, Sir Patrick, Scottish envoy
to France, ii. 50.
Ogilvy, Lord, adherent of Queen
Mary, iii. 211— on Burghley's list
of Catholic lords, 313.
Ogilvy, William, Abbot of Wiirzburg,
iv. 41.
Olav the Peaceful, King of Norway,
receives Turgot, i. 180.
Olav Trygvessen, King, converted to
Christianity, i. 231.
Olav the White, Norwegian king of
Dublin, i. 202.
Olier, M., intercourse of Charles II.
with, iv. 94.
Oliphant, Lord, founder of Franciscan
convent at Perth, ii. 97.
O'Neill, Paul and Daniel, Franciscan
missionaries in Scotland, iv. 72.
Ordericus Vitalis, on the restoration
of lona, i. 253.
Orkney, Christianity in, i. 262 —
double episcopal succession in, 263
— murder of the Bishop of, ii. 43
— ceded to the Scottish crown, 74
— ecclesiastically united to Scot
land, 90 — succession of bishops of,
428 — Bothwell created Duke of,
iii. 132 — Bishop Geddes travels on
foot to, iv. 255.
INDEX.
459
Oswald, Bishop of Galloway, ii. 42.
Oswald, King of Xorthumbria, i. 115
— sends for Scottish missionaries,
116 — his death, 125 — devotion to
him in Ayrshire and Galloway,
172.
Oswy, King, successor of Oswald, i.
126 — defeats Penda, ib. — his death,
127.
Otho, papal legate, i. 350.
Otterburn, Sir Adam, Scottish ambas
sador in England, ii. 143.
Otterburn, battle of, ii. 32.
PADUA, Archbishop Alexander Stuart
at, ii. 115 — Scottish professors at,
iv. 124, 125.
Paisley, Cluniac Abbey of, i. 317 —
sacked by the mob, ii. 276 — burn
ing of, iii. 15.
Palladius, St, successor of St Ninian,
i- 17 — Prosper of Aquitaine on,
18 — Fordun's development of the
legend of, 20 — in the Lives of St
Patrick, 21 — devotion to him in
Scotland, 25 — mentioned in the
bull restoring the Scottish hier
archy, iv. 309.
Panter, David, Bishop of Ross, ii.
182 — consecrated at Jedburgh
194.
Paolini, Mgr. , first rector of the
Scotch College, Rome, iii. 387.
Paris, Scotch College at, its origin,
ii. 24 — its need of reform, iv. 121
— papal privileges to, 145 note —
infected with Jansenism, 204, 209,
251 — its condition as depicted by
Bishop Hay, 252 — complaints
against the principal of, 260 —
broken up at the Revolution, ib.
— part of its library taken to Blairs
College, 287 — Lercari's report of,
408 et seq.
Paris, Matthew, on the opposition
encountered by papal legates in
Scotland, i. 350, 351.
Parliament, Church questions decided
by, ii. 35, 59 — of 1560, ecclesias
tics present at the, 296 — doubtful
character of that assembly, 298 —
its enactments against the Catholic
Church, 307, 309 — opening of
Queen Mary's first, iii. 74— penal
laws passed by, 233 — enactments
of, in favour of Episcopalianism,
357 — Catholic emancipation passed
by, iv. 277.
Parochial system, its first appearance
in Scotland, i. 275, 289.
Paterson, Alexander, coadjutor to
Bishop Cameron, iv. 272 — his
death, 283.
Paton, Alexander, charged with paint
ing a crucifix, iii. 399.
Patras, traditional connection of St
Andrew with, i. 191, 192.
Patrick, St, Palladius in the Lives of,
i. 21 — on the relapse of the early
Church, 31.
Patronage in the Scotch Established
Church, iv. 318 — under James VI.,
319 — abolition of, 320 — restored
under Anne, 321 — revival of the
contest as to, 322.
Patterson, Thomas, S.J., chaplain to
James II. at Holyrood, iv. 127.
Paul, St, his supposed visit to Britain,
i. 1.
Paul II. , Pope, ii. 88.
Paul III., Pope, writes to James V.,
ii. 141 — creates Beaton a cardinal,
154 — his subsidy to King James,
158.
Paul IV., Pope, sends a legate to
Scotland, ii. 274.
Paul V., Pope, writes to James VI.,
iii. 419 — condemns the oath of
allegiance, 421 — his death, 425 —
permission granted by him to
Father Forbes, 476 — text of his
letter to King James, 477 — his
memorandum on the Spanish
match, 481 — grants privileges to
the Capuchin missionaries in Scot
land, iv. 73 — and to the Scotch
College at Paris, 145 note.
Pay, Stephen de, bishop-elect of St
Andrews, ii. 39.
Payne, Henry Neville, charged with
conspiracy, iv. 141 — tortured and
imprisoned, ib.
Pecthelm, Bishop of Galloway, i. 12,
172.
Peel, Sir Robert, supports Catholic
emancipation, iv. 277.
460
INDEX.
Pelleve', Nicholas cle, papal legate in
Scotland, ii. 274.
Penal laws, enacted against Catholics,
ii. 307 — passed by successive Par
liaments, iii. 233 — enforcement of,
under Charles I., iv. 9, 10 — under
Charles II., 120 — additional, under
William III., 144 — in the reign of
Anne, 159 — summary of the, 229—
riots caused by proposed repeal of,
233 — protest of the General As
sembly against the repeal, 234 —
relief bill supported by Protestants,
238 — Burke denounces the, 243 —
partial repeal -of the, 246 — con
demned by Protestant historians,
232, 247 note.
Penda, King of Mercia, defeats and
slays St Oswald, i. 125 — killed by
Oswy, 126.
Percy, Sir Henry, in correspondence
with the congregation, ii. 278.
Persico, Archbishop, blesses the first
abbot of Fort-Augustus, iv. 336
note.
Perth, Carthusian monastery at, ii.
53, 97 — destroyed by the " rascal
multitude," 266 — Franciscan con
vent at, ii. 9" — meeting of the Con
gregation at, 263.
Perth, councils held at, i. 330, 331,
340, 349, 367, 368 ; ii. IS, 29, 62,
85.
Perth, James, fourth Earl of, Chancel
lor of Scotland, iv. 137 — popular
fury against, 138— imprisoned at
Stirling, ib. — proceeds to Rome, ib.
— governor to the Prince of Wales,
139— his death, ib.
Peter, Bishop of Aberdeen, statutes
promulgated by, i. 371.
Peter, St, churches in Scotland dedi
cated to, i. 179.
Petraleoni, Cardinal, papal legate,
holds a council at Northampton, i.
319.
Phelippes, Thomas, employed to de
cipher Queen Mary's letters, iii.
294, 301.
Philip II., King of Spain, acquires
the relics of St Margaret, i. 262
note — his proposed expedition
against England, iii. 276 — his
contribution towards the cause,
285 — report sent to, as to the
religious attitude of James VI.,
310 — sends Colonel Sempill to
Scotland, iv. 57.
Philip IV., King, proposed marriage
of his sister to Charles, Prince of
Wales, iii. 424 — appoints a com
mission to draw up the marriage
articles, 425 — the negotiations
broken off, 427.
Phillip, Robert, missionary in Scot
land, iv. 51 — enters the French
Oratory, ib.
Piazza, Giulio, internuncio at Brussels,
on Bishop Nicolson's appointment,
iv. 147, 148.
Piccolomini, ^-Eneas, his visit to Scot
land, ii. 67.
Picts, character of their paganism, i.
69 — its identity with Irish Druid-
ism, 72 — Columban foundations
among the, 82 — united to Dalriada
under Kenneth, 215.
Picts, Northern, first evangelised by
St Columba, i. 55 — the saint's
labours among them, 68.
Picts, Southern, embrace Christian
ity, i. 9 — connection between their
Church and that of Ireland, 26 —
Nectan, King of the, 27 — charged
by St Patrick with apostasy, 32 —
conform to the Roman rite, 122 —
united with Northumbria, 126 — -
evangelised by St Kentigern, 155
—and by St Cuthbert, 162.
Pilgrims, Irish, to Whithorn, i. 10.
Pinkie, defeat of the Scotch at, ii.
191.
Pitcairn, Robert, commendator of
Dunfermline, iii. 171.
Pitt, Catholic oath proposed by, iv.
256 — its condemnation by the Scot
tish bishops, 257.
Pittenweem, priory of, granted to
Archbishop of St Andrews, ii. 89 —
bestowed by Moray on Sir James
Balfour, iii. 159.
Pius IV., Pope, sends the Golden
Rose to Queen Mary, iii. 56 —
despatches Goudanus to Scotland,
58 — forwards to Mary the acts of
the Council of Trent, 79 — grants
INDEX.
461
dispensation for her marriage to
Darnley, 82.
Pius V., Pope, envoy from Scotland
to, iii. 93 — sends Bishop Laureo as
nuncio to Queen Mary, 94 — text of
bishop's address to, 442.
Pius VI. , Pope, letter from the Scot
tish bishops to, iv. 247.
Pius VII., Pope, raises Charles Erskine
to the cardinalate, iv. 259 note.
Pius IX., Pope, consecrates Bishop
Strain, iv. 291 — address of Scottish
Catholics to, 297 — his opinion as
to the restoration of the Scottish
hierarchy, 298.
Plunkett, Archbishop Oliver, visits
the Hebrides, iv. 86.
Pluscardine, Valliscaulian monastery
of, i. 356.
Pomponia Grjecina, one of the first
Christians in Britain, i. 2.
Pont-a-Mousson, Scottish seminary at,
iii. 252, 388 — transferred to Douai,
389.
Poulet, Sir Amias, appointed keeper
of Queen Mary, iii. 287 — his re
fusal to assassinate her, 305.
Prefect-apostolic, appointment of the
first Scottish, iv. 44.
Premonstratensians, foundations of,
i. 303 — list of their houses in Scot
land, iv. 325.
Presbyterianism, tyranny of dominant,
iv. 263, 264 — successive phases of,
318.
Preshome, death of Bishop Nicolson
at, iv. 182— Bishop Hay at, 215.
Prestonpans, Jacobite victory at, iv.
191 — George (afterwards Bishop)
Hay at, 213.
Primacy, seat of the, at Dunkeld, i.
215 — at Abernethy, 216 — at St
Andrews, 220.
Prosper of Aquitaine, St, on St Pal-
ladius, i. 18.
Puritans, English, their disappoint
ment at the Church policy of James
VI., iii. 375.
QUIGRICH, the, ii. 365.
RAE, Bishop of Glasgow, ii. 31.
Ralph, Archbishop of Canterbury,
and the see of St Andrews, i. 275,
276.
Ralph (I. and II.), Bishops of Orkney,
i. 263, 264.
Ramsay, Thomas, minister of Dum
fries, prosecutes Catholics, iv. 28 —
becomes insane, 74.
Randolph, English agent in Edin
burgh, ii. 309 — reports the flight
of Scottish priests, iii. 74 — obliged
to quit the country, 251.
Ranny, Patrick, Franciscan guardian
at Stirling, ii. 132.
Rationalism, spread of the spirit of,
iv. 329.
Ratisbon, Scotch monastery at, iii.
247 note — missionaries from, 392- —
foundation of seminary at, iv. 175
— benefactions to it, 176 — its use
fulness impaired, 177 — Bishop
Gillis at, 267 — appeal to the Bavar
ian Government on behalf of, 288 —
distinguished alumni of, ib. note —
suppression of the monastery, 290
— fate of its library, ib. note —
Abbot Stuart's account of, 374
et fieq.
Records, early Scottish, destroyed at
the Reformation, i. 30.
Reform, zeal of St Margaret for, i.
245.
Reformation, changes wrought by the,
ii. 320 — causes of its success in
Scotland, 321 — education and art
in Scotland before the, 326 et seq. —
the Scottish, depicted in the Basill-
Icon Doron, iii. 365.
Reginald, Lord of the Isles, founder
of Sandale Abbey, i. 316 — restores
lona, 334 — becomes a feudatory of
the Pope, 357.
Regulus, St, and the relics of St
Andrew, i. 291 et seq.
Reid of Barskimming, Adam, charged
with Lollardism, ii. 112.
Reid, Robert, Bishop of Orkney, ii.
195 — restores Kirkwall Cathedral,
197 — witness to Queen Mary's
marriage with the Dauphin, ib. —
dies at Dieppe, 198 — his bequest
for college at Edinburgh, ib.
Religious orders, introduced into
Scotland, i. 285 — brought back by
4G2
INDEX.
Bishop Gillis, iv. 290— list of their
houses before the Reformation, 424,
425— in 1890, 426.
Resby, John, charged with Lollardism,
ii. 54 — burned at Perth, ib.
Restalrig, collegiate church of, ii. 415
— its demolition, iii. 12.
Restitutus, Bishop of London, attends
the Council of Aries, i. 4.
Richard, Bishop of St Andrews, i.
315.
Richard, Bishop of Man, i. 370 —
drowned on a voyage from Norway,
ib. note.
Richardson, Robert, canon of Cam-
buskenneth, ii. 149.
Rievaulx, St Aelred of, biographer of
St Ninian, i. 5 — abbey of, 302.
Rig, Robert, prosecuted by Dumfries
Presbytery for Popery, iv. 27, 28.
Rigg, George, appointed bishop of
Dunkeld, iv. 311.
Rinuccini, Archbishop, his life of
Archangel Leslie, iv. 76 — inac
curacy of its details, ib. note.
Ripon, St Wilfrid, Abbot of, i. 133—
staff of St Columba preserved at,
156 — St Cuthbert guest-master at,
160— tomb of St Wilfrid at, 171.
Rizzio, David, Secretary to Queen
Mary, iii. 96 — plot against, ib. —
his murder, 97.
Robe, Father, rector of the Scotch
College, Douai, iv. 220.
Robert, Bishop of St Andrews, i. 291,
308, 314.
Robert I., King of Scotland. See
Bruce.
Robert II., King, ii. 32.
Robert III., King, his accession, ii.
32 — his death, 34 — abuses in the
Church during his reign, 82.
Robertson, Alexander, missionary in
Scotland, efforts made to apprehend
him, iv. 51.
Robertson, Andrew, missionary in
Scotland, capture and imprison
ment of, iv. 52.
Robertson, Anselm, O.S.B., last
monk of St James's, Ratisbon, iv.
288.
Robertson, John, S.J., imprisoned for
the faith, iv. 59.
Robison, Thomas, executed for saying
mass, iii. 230.
Rochester, Anglican bishopric of,
offered to John Knox, ii. 221.
Roger, Bishop of Orkney, consecrated
by Archbishop of York, i. 264.
Roger, Bishop of St Andrews, i. 329.
Komanos Pontifice.n, bull of Pope Leo
XIII., iv. 336 et seq.
Rome, education of St Ninian at,
i. 6 — visit of St Columba to, 84 —
Bishop Hay in, iv. 250 — intimate
relations of Scotland with, 339.
Rome, Scotch College at, founded by
Clement VIII., iii. 386 — its need
of reform, iv. 121 — legacy to, from
Bishop Leslie of Laybach, 1 25 — list
of rectors of, 249 note — question of
appointing national superiors to,
254, 258 — unsatisfactory state of
the College, 258 — erection of new
building, 290.
Ronald, Earl of Orkney, builder of
Kirkwall Cathedral, i. 263.
Ronan, St, at lona, i. 205 — his feast-
day, 206.
Roslin Chapel, architecture of, ii. 390
— collegiate foundation of, 415.
Rosnat, name applied to Whithorn, i.
39.
Rospigliosi, report of Cardinal, on the
Hebrides, iv. 85.
Ross, James, Duke of, Archbishop of
St Andrews, ii. 113 — his death,
114.
Ross, foundation of see of, i. 291—
succession of bishops of, ii. 429.
Rothes, Norman, Master of, assassin
of Cardinal Beaton, ii. 176.
Rothesay, murder of David, Duke of,
ii. 33.
Rough, apostate Dominican, in the
service of Arran, ii. 161.
Row, John, joins the Reformers, ii.
294 — appointed preacher at Perth,
ib.
Roxburgh, council of, i. 296 — siege
and capture of, ii. 73.
Rudolph, Emperor of Germany, en
deavours to restore the Scoto-Ger-
man monasteries, iii. 246 — his
letter to the Pope on the subject,
247.
INDEX.
463
Rum, island of, inhabited entirely by
Catholics, iv. 163.
Runic monuments, described, ii. 385.
Russell, Bishop of Man, ii. 31.
Russell, Jerome, burned at Glasgow,
ii. 144.
Ruthven, Lord, conspires to murder
Rizzio, iii. 97 — escorts Queen Mary
to Lochleven, 139 — perjury of,
146.
Ruthven, the Raid of, iii. 257.
Ruthwell Cross, the, ii. 385, 386—
ordered to be demolished, iv. 31.
SABIXA, mother of St Cuthbert, i. 159.
Sadler, Sir Ralph, implicated in the
murder of Cardinal Beaton, ii. 167
— Queen Elizabeth's commissioner
at York, iii. 172.
Salisbury, Scottish cathedral chapters
erected on the model of, i. 290, 305
—Glasgow adopts the customs of,
371 — treaty of, ii. 4 — rite of, how
far prevalent in Scotland, 404.
Sanctuary, privilege of, in the early
Irish monasteries, i. 49.
Sandale, Cistercian abbey of, founded
by Reginald of the Isles, i. 316.
Sandilands, Sir John, ii. 336 — his
mission to France, iii. 18.
Sanquhar, Lord, on Burghley's list of
Catholic Lords, iv. 313.
San Vito, Antony of, papal legate to
Scotland, ii. 66.
Sarum breviary and missal, adopted
in Scotland, i. 307.
Sauchie, battle of, ii. 77.
Scalan, seminary of, founded by
Bishop Nicolson, iv. 174 — plunder
ed and burned after Culloden, 192
— transferred to Aquhorties, 223.
Scarborough, Darnley's scheme to
seize the castle of, iii. 110.
Schaffhausen, ancient copy of life of
St Columba discovered at, ii. 360.
Scholars, eminent Scottish, ii. 332 et
seq, — Scottish, on the Continent,
343.
Schools, Scottish medieval, ii. 326 —
monastic, 327— Celtic, how direc
ted, 328 — Catholic, under Charles
II. , iv. 1 1 9 — help asked for erecting,
130.
Scilly Isles, Charles II. in the, iv.
89.
Scone, assembly at the Moot-hill of,
i. 220— canons-regular at, 286, 360
— coronation stone of, ii. 8 — coun
cil at, 19 — destruction of the abbey
and palace of, 272 — Charles II.
crowned at, iv. 90.
Scot, Alexander, his sufferings for the
faith, iii. 353, 459.
Scotia, kingdom first so called, i. 230.
Scots, Columban foundations among
the, i. 79 — the inhabitants of Pict-
land, when first so called, 202.
Scott, Andrew, action brought against
The Protestant by, iv. 273 —
damages awarded to him, 274 —
development of Catholicism in
Glasgow under, ib. — vicar-apostolic
of the Western District, 283.
Scott, Michael, of Balwirie, ii. 335.
Scott, Sir Walter, on the intruded
curates, iv. 105 note — in favour of
Catholic emancipation, 277.
Scotus, Adam, Fremonstratensian
canon, ii. 333.
Scotus, David, ii. 333.
Scotus, Duns, ii. 335.
Scotus, John, bishop-elect of St
Andrews, i. 325 et spq.
Scotus, Marianus, ii. 332.
Scroope, Lord and Lady, custodians
of Queen Mary at Carlisle, iii. 166.
Seaton, Friar Alexander, ii. 150.
Sects, subdivisions of Protestant, iv.
87, 327.
Sedulius, probable successor of St
Kentigern, i. 157 — attends council
at Rome, 170.
Segine, Abbot of lona, i. 114— sends
missionaries to Northumbria, 117
— founds church of Rathlin, 125.
Selkirk, Benedictine house at, i. 288
— removed to Kelso, 301.
Sempill, Lord, charge brought against,
iii. 235.
Sempill, Colonel William, founder of
Scotch College, Madrid, iv. 57 —
letter from Archangel Leslie to,
78.
Servanus (Serf), St, his connection
with Palladius, i. 25 — and with
Kentigern, 26— legend of, 188.
464
INDEX.
Service-book, the, of Edward VI.,
sanctioned by Knox, ii. 278 — of
Geneva, iii. 9— introduced into St
Giles', Edinburgh, iv. 3.
Session, institution of the Court of,
ii. 49.'
Seton, Alexander, Chancellor of Scot
land, iii. 336.
Seton, James, S.J., missionary in
Scotland, iv. 59.
Seton, John, S.J., missionary in
Scotland, iv. 127 — his imprison
ment and death, ib. — his petition
to the Privy Council, 144.
Seton, Lord, Provost of Edinburgh,
ii. 273 — his fidelity to the faith,
iii. 241, 256.
Severinus, Pope, letter from the Irish
Church to, i. 124.
Shand, Robert, Benedictine mis
sionary in Scotland, iv. 394.
Shand, William, missionary in Scot
land, his death, iv. 195, 397.
Sharp, James, minister of Crail,
turns Episcopalian, iv. 104 — ap
pointed Archbishop of St Andrews,
ib. — his unpopularity, 106 —
brutally murdered, 107 — his claim
to rank as a martyr, ib. note.
Shaw of Polkemmet, Andrew, charged
with Lollardism, ii. 112.
Shetland, ceded to the Scottish crown,
ii. 74.
Sheves, William, second Archbishop
of St Andrews, ii. 94 — privileges
granted to, 108 — his death, 111.
Sibilla, Queen to Alexander L, re
ceives Bishop Eadmer at St
Andrews, i. 279 — her death and
burial at Loch Tay, 111.
Sigillo, Hugh de, Bishop of Dunkeld,
the "poor man's bishop," i.
338.
Sigurd of Orkney, attacks lona, i.
227 — converted to Christianity,
230, 262— his death, 231.
Silvaiius, Father, superior of Bene
dictine missionaries in Scotland,
iv. 41, 81 — applies for a papal
visitation of the Scoto - German
monasteries, 82.
Simson, Duncan, burned at Edin
burgh, ii. 144.
Sinclair, Henry, Bishop of Ross, ii.
195 — refuses to receive the papal
nuncio, ii. 60 — his death, 89.
Sinclair, John, Provost of Restalrig,
iii. 12 — marries Darnley to Queen
Mary, 81 — appointed Bishop of
Brechin, 90 — his death, ib.
Sinclair, Robert, Keeper of the
Privy Seal, iii. 144 — refuses to
violate his trust, ib.
Sinclair, William, Bishop of Dun
keld, leads his vassals against the
English invaders, ii. 24.
Sinclair, citizen of Edinburgh, con
demned to death for harbouring
priests, iii. 402.
Siricius, Pope, consecrates St Ninian,
i. 8.
Sixtus IV. , Pope, writes to the Scot
tish nobles, ii. 76 — erects the
archbishopric of St Andrews, 88
— sends a nuncio to Scotland, 93
— deposes Archbishop Graham, 94
— exempts Aberdeen from juris
diction of St Andrews, 108.
Slebhine, Abbot of lona, i. 208.
Slingardi, Bishop, nuncio in France,
reports numerous conversions in
Scotland, iii. 344.
Smith, Alexander, named coadjutor
to Bishop Gordon, iv. 194 — apos
tolic zeal of, 196 — his proposals
to Propaganda, ib. — receives a co
adjutor, 198 — charges brought by
Lercari against, 207 — his death,
217— text of his reports to Rome
(translated), 392, 395, 399, 405.
Smith, John, S.J., missionary in
Scotland, iv. 60 — converts Menzies
of Pitfodels, 61.
Smith, Richard, second vicar-aposto
lic in England, iv. 39 — resigns, 40
—letter of Pope Urban VIII. to,
343, 344.
Smith, Professor Robertson, his
arraignment for heresy, iv. 329.
Soltre, hospital at, i. 316.
Solway Moss, rout of the Scotch at,
ii. 157.
Somerled, Lord of the Isles, i. 333,
334.
Somerset, Duke of, invades Scotland,
ii. 191.
INDEX.
465
Sorbonne, doctors of the, their visit
to Edinburgh, ii. 274.
Soulseat, Premonstratensian monas
tery of, i. 303.
Spalding, on the abolition of Christ
mas and Easter, quoted, iv. 32,
34.
•Spanish expedition against England,
proposed, iii. 276, 278 — Queen
Mary's hopes of the, 280 — collapse
of the scheme, 285.
Spence, Thomas, Bishop of Aberdeen,
founds Franciscan convent, ii. 98
— exempted by Sixtus IV. from
jurisdiction of St Andrews, 108.
Spinelli, Cardinal-protector of Scot
land, ordains Bishop Hay, iv. 215.
Spottiswood, James, Archbishop of
Glasgow, on the demolition of
churches, quoted, iii. 16 — nom
inated to the see of Glasgow, 376
— consecrated in London, 381 —
his' ruffianly treatment of Father
Ogilvie, 415.
Spreule, Francis, S.J., convert from
Presbyterianism, iv. 60.
Spynie, cathedral of the see of
Moray at, i. 284, 338.
Spynie, William of, Bishop of Moray,
consecrated by anti-pope Benedict
XIII. , ii. 41.
Sta. Agatha, Peter de, papal legate
in Scotland, i. 323.
St Albans, abbey of, i. 5.
Standard, battle of the, i. 288.
St Andrews, origin of the city and
university of, i. 161 — legends re
lating to the foundation of, 190 et
seq.— Bishop Cellach of, 220—
primacy transferred to, ib. —
church of, under Malcolm III.,
057 — the last Celtic bishop of,
254 — priory of canons-regular at,
299 — disputed succession to see
of, 325, 370 — diocesan synod of,
352 et seq. — its cathedral com
pleted, ii. 22 — synodal statutes of,
36, 119 — foundation of university
of, 5? et seq. — St Salvator's College
at, 86, 414 — erected into an arch
bishopric, 88 — opposition to the
measure, 92 — Franciscan convent
VOL. IV.
at, 97- -St Leonard's College at,
116 — Protestants burned at, 57,
136, 144, 175, 236 — provincial
council at, 169 — conspirators in
the castle of, 181, 188 — wreck of
the churches of, 270 — succession
of bishops of, 424 — burning of
witches at, iii. 205 — re-erection of
cathedral chapter of, iv. 307 note
— restoration of the see of, 310 —
Bishop Strain named archbishop
of, ib. — extent of the restored dio
cese, 416.
St Asaph's, church of, founded by St
Kentigern, i. 153 note.
Statistics of the Church in Scotland
under Queen Anne, iv. 162, 178 —
in 1778, 228— in 1800, 263, 268—
in 1829, 273, 275— in 1835, 284—
in 1890, 426.
St Bathans, Cistercian convent at, i.
316.
Stephen, King of England, forbids
Waltheof's election to the see of
York, i. 310.
Stevens, Bishop of Dunblane, ii. 58,
68.
Stewart, Allan, Commendator of
Crossraguel, iii. 107 note — roasted
by Earl of Cassillis, 213.
Stewart, James, banished as a noted
Papist, iii. 400.
Stewart of Lorn marries Joanna,
queen-dowager, ii. 70.
Stewart, Robert, bishop - elect of
Caithness, embraces Protestantism,
iii. 89.
Stewart, Sir Walter, Scottish envoy
to France, ii. 44.
St Fillans, parish in Strathearn, i.
27.
St Giles's Church, Edinburgh, colle
giate foundation of, ii. 415 — the
" Service-book " in, iv. 3 — riot in,
ib.
Stirling, Franciscan convent at, ii.
132 — chapel-royal of, 415 — narrow
escape of Queen Mary at, iii. 29
note — baptism of James VI. at,
104 — his coronation at, 146 —
death of Regent Lennox at, 217 —
James VI. confined at, 257.
2 G
466
INDEX.
Strachan, George, Scottish mission
ary, expelled from Edinburgh by
the town council, iii. 408.
Strachan, James, Canon of Aberdeen,
at religious disputation in Edin
burgh, iii. 13.
Strachan, Robert, Professor of Greek
at Padua, iv. 124.
Strain, John, Eastern vicar-apostolic,
iv. 291 — consecrated by Pius IX.,
ib. — spokesman of Scottish depu
tation to Rome, 297 — named Arch
bishop of St Andrews and Edin
burgh, 310.
Straiten, David, banished for heresy,
ii. 144.
Strathclyde, evangelised by St Ken-
tigern, i. 152, 154 — its inhabitants
conform to Rome, 170 — ravaged by
the Danes, 201.
Strozzi, Leo and Peter, land at Leith
in command of Italian troops, ii.
192.
Stuart, Alexander, archbishop-elect
of St Andrews, ii. 114 — killed at
Flodden, 116.
Stuart, Andrew, Bishop of Caithness,
ii. 182.
Stuart, Benedict Henry, Cardinal.
See York.
Stuart, Bernard, Abbot of St James's,
Ratisbon, describes the ravages of
Jansenism, iv. 204 — sketch of his
life, 288 note — his appeal to Pro
paganda, 374 ft seq.
Stuart, Lord James. See Moray,
Earl of.
Stuart, John, pseudo - envoy from
James VI., iii. 282 — detected in
Rome, 283.
Stuart, Louis, of Aubigny, proposed
by Charles II. for the cardinalate,
iv. 96.
Stuart, Robert, bishop-elect of Caith
ness, ii. 182 — turns Protestant,
ib.
Study in the Columban monasteries,
i. 105.
Stuteville, Robert de, bishop-elect of
St Andrews, i. 370.
St Victor, James of, papal legate,
presides over a Scottish council, i.
340.
St Victor, Richard of, mystical
writer, ii. 333.
St Vigeans, the stone of, ii. 383.
Suarez, Francis, S.J., his controversy
with James VI. on the oath of
allegiance, iii. 421.
Suma, Albert de, papal legate in
Scotland, i. 323.
Sunday, zeal of St Margaret for the
observance of, i. 249 — name of,
superseded by Sabbath, iii. 11.
Superintendents, appointment of Pro
testant, ii. 294 — provision for, in
the Book of Discipline, iii. 7.
Sweetheart, Cistercian abbey of, i.
369.
Synods, diocesan, i. 308 ; ii. 113.
TAILLTE, supposed excommunication of
St Columba by the synod of, i. 59.
Tara, fortress of, i. 50 — canons passed
by the synod of, 145.
Taylor, Simon, Dominican writer on
church music, ii. 335.
Taylor, William, servant to Darnley,
iii. 114.
Tayre (Tyrie), James, S.J., ii. 344—
his controversy with Knox, iii. 225
— disputes with Andrew Melville,
243.
Teller, Canon Henry, proposed as
vicar-apostolic in England, iv. 40.
Templars, Knights, introduced by
David I. , i. 303 — proceedings
against them, ii. 21, 25 — list of
their houses in Scotland, iv. 425.
Ternan, St, disciple of Palladius, i.
23 — brings his relics to the Mearns,
24— his bell and gospel-book, 25 —
church dedicated to him at Arbuth-
nott, ii. 406.
Tertullian on early British Christian
ity, i. 3.
Thenog, St, mother of St Kentigern,
i. 151 — singular survival of her
name in Glasgow, ib.
Theodore, Archbishop of Canterbury,
his differences with St Wilfrid, i.
142 — consecrates St Cuthbert at
York, 166.
Thomas, Archbishop of York, conse
crates Bishop Turgot of St Andrews,
i. 273.
INDEX.
467
Thorulf, Bishop of Orkney, i. 265.
Thurstin, Archbishop of York, i. 264
— Scottish suffragans of, 266 —
opposes the consecration of Ead-
mer, 279.
Tighernac, monasteries founded by,
i. 39.
Tiron, Benedictines brought to Scot
land from, i. 288.
Toledo, council of, i. 183 — John
Geddes consecrated by the Arch
bishop of, iv. 249.
Tolorggain (Talarican), founder of
church of Fordyce, i. 113.
Tonsure, form of the Celtic, i. 34,
103 — other kinds, ib. — adoption in
lona of the Roman, 204.
Torphichen, preceptory of Knights
Hospitallers at, i. 303.
Torres, Aegidius de, papal legate in
Scotland, receives contributions for
the Crusade, i. 340.
Tournai, foundation of Scotch College
at, iii. 388 — the Master of Forbes
becomes a Capuchin at, 409.
Tours, visit of St Ninian to, i. 8 —
marriage of Princess Margaret of
Scotland at, ii. 51.
Tradition, survival in Scotland of
Catholic, iii. 418.
Trail, Bishop of St Andrews, ii. 40.
Traquhair, Countess of, ordered to
educate her son a Protestant, iv.
Ill — raid on her residence, 140.
Trefontaney, Cistercian convent of, i.
303.
Trent, Scotland and the Council of, ii.
169 ; iii. 56, 78.
Trinitarians, foundation of, i. 332 —
list of their houses in Scotland, iv.
425.
Trinity Church, Edinburgh, founded
by Mary of Gueldres, ii. 415 —
wanton destruction of, ib. note.
Trumuin, Bishop of the Southern
Picts, i. 143 — forced to fly, ib.
Tuath, tribal system in Ireland, i.
36.
Tuda, Bishop of Lindisfarne, i. 163.
Tulchan - bishops, summoned before
the General Assembly, iii. 267 —
explanation of the term, ib. note.
Turgot, biographer of St Margaret, i.
241 — first Saxon Bishop of St
Andrews, 272 — his death, 275.
Turnbull, Bishop of Glasgow, founds
Glasgow University, ii. 86.
Tuthald, Bishop of St Andrews, i.
239.
"Twapenny Faith," the, ii. 219.
Twyford, St Cuthbert chosen bishop
at the synod of, i. 166.
Tylilum, Carmelite friars at, i. 369 —
diocesan synod of Dunkeld held at,
ii. 113.
Tyninghame, foundation of monastery
of, i. 173.
Tyrie, Father. See Tayre.
UIST, visit of Bishop Nicolson to, iv.
152 — persecution of Catholics in,
218 — exertions of Bishop Hay on
their behalf, ib.
Ulrich, Cardinal, papal legate, gives
pallium to Bishop Turgot, i. 273.
Ungus, King of the Picts, i. 191, 192.
Union of England and Scotland, iv.
158 — means by which it was
carried, ib.
Universities, first in Scotland, i. 191,
192 ; ii. 57 — Scotsmen at the
Continental, 331 — opinion of the
Catholic, as to the Pope's dispens
ing power, iv. 257.
Urban III, Pope, i. 327, 336.
Urban VI., Pope, ii. 45.
Urban VIII., Pope, and the marriage
of Charles I., iii. 430 — grants dis
pensation, 432 — report to, on the
state of Scotland, iv. 8 — his letter
to Queen Henrietta Maria, 26 —
names Cardinal Barberini Protector
of Scotland, 38 — appoints Richard
Smith vicar-apostolic, 39 — grants
faculties to Archangel Leslie, 80 —
privileges granted by him to Scotch
College, Paris, 145 note — his letter
to Bishop Smith, 343, 344.
Urquhart, Benedictine priory of, i,
302 — disputed appointment to the
priorship of, ii. 35.
Ursulines, brought to Edinburgh by
Bishop Gillis, iv. 282.
VAISON, Scottish bishops of, iii. 129.
Val-des-Choux, monks of, i. 356, 358
468
INDEX.
— list of their houses in Scotland,
iv. 425.
Valens, Robert, S.J., missionary in
Scotland, iv. 59 — dangers incurred
by, 60.
Valladolid, Scotch College at, iv. 58,
248 — Father Geddes appointed
rector of, 248.
Vatican Council, Scottish bishops at
the, iv. 291.
Venaiitius Fortunatus, on the sup
posed visit of St Paul to Britain,
i. 1.
Vicar-apostolic, appointment of the
first English, iii. 433 — the first
Scottish, iv. 145 — of the High
lands, 187 — nomination of a third,
275.
Victor of Aquitaine, reformed Paschal
reckoning of, i. 134, 135.
Victor, Pope, and early Scottish
Christianity, i. 3, 4.
Vienna, Scotch monastery at, iii. 247,
392.
Vikings, the, on the west coast of
Scotland, i. 217.
Vincent of Paul, St, sends mission
aries to Scotland, iv. 83.
Visitation of the sick, Celtic form of,
ii. 423.
Vitelleschi, general of the Jesuits,
report on the state of Scotland sent
to, iv. 59.
Vivian, Cardinal, papal legate to
England and Scotland, i. 322.
WALCIODOKUS, St Cadroc Abbot of, i.
230.
Waldby, Bishop of Man, ii. 42.
Wales, Irish monachism introduced
from, i. 40.
Walker, John, superior of the Scot
tish mission, iv. 12 — conversions
wrought by him, ib.
Wallace, Adam, executed for heresy,
ii. 220.
Wallace, John, converted to Cathol
icism, iv. 183 — summoned for
"apostasy," ib. — named coadjutor
to Bishop Gordon, 184 — arrest
and imprisonment of, 166 — text of
his reports to Propaganda (trans
lated), 381, 383.
Wallace, Sir William, ii. 12— his life
written by his chaplain, John Blair,
337.
Walsh, Friar Peter, said to have
drawn up a formulary for the
Catholic oath, iv. 100.
Walsingham, Sir Francis, intercepts
Queen Mary's letters, iii. 288 — his
connection with the Babington
plot, 291 — agents employed by
him, 292, 294, 295.
Walter, Bishop of Glasgow, i. 331,
339.
Walter, High Steward of Scotland,
ii. 17.
Waltheof , half-brother to David I. , i.
309 — successively canon-regular,
Abbot of Melrose, and bishop-elect
of St Andrews, 310— his death,
ib.
Ward, Cornelius, Franciscan mission
ary in Scotland, iv. 66 — conver
sions through his means, ib., 70 —
imprisoned in London, 69.
Wardlaw, Henry, Bishop of St An
drews, ii. 40 — founds St Andrews
University, 58.
Wardlaw, Walter, Bishop of Glasgow,
ii. 31 — made cardinal, 758. V\O
Watson, John, theological lecturer at
Aberdeen, ii. 200.
Wauchope of Niddry, forbidden to
communicate with his son, iv. Ill,
112 — Jesuit missionaries living
with, 369.
Weems, minister in Edinburgh, his
zeal against Catholics, iv. 51.
Wemyss, John, benefactor of Scotch
College, Pont-a-Mousson, iii. 389.
Westminster, opening of Conference
at, iii. 188— its close, 200.
Weymouth, Lord, supports Scotch
Catholic relief bill, iv. 240.
Wharton, Lord, Warden of the
Marches, reports Cardinal Beaton's
murder to Henry VIII., ii. 187-
Whitby, founded by St Finan, i. 129
— synod of, 131 — its result, 139.
White, Alexander, convert to Cathol
icism, iv. 139.
White, Francis, Lazarist missionary
in Scotland, iv. 84 — his adventure
in Glengarry, ib. note.
INDEX.
469
Whiteford, Charles, procurator of
Scotch College, Paris, iv. 205 —
charged with Jansenism, 409.
Whitehall, execution of Charles I. at,
iv. 8.
Whithorn, first stone church in Scot
land at, i. 8 — Irish pilgrims to, 10
— St Ninian's cave at, 11 — Irish
monachism derived from, 38 —
Premonstratensian monastery at,
303 — imprisonment of the last
prior of, ii. 73 — ancient monument
at, 386 — restoration of the bishop
ric of, 416.
Whittingham, murder of Darnley
plotted at, iii. 113.
Wilfrid, St, his early training, i. 132
— becomes Abbot of Ripon, 133 —
opposes Colman at the synod of
Whitby, ib. — decision in his favour,
138— made Bishop of York, 141—
expelled from his see, 142 — appeals
to Rome, ib. — becomes Bishop of
Lindisfarne, 171 — his death, ib.
Wilkes, John, and the Scotch Cath
olic relief bill, iv. 242.
Wilkie, citizen of Edinburgh, con
demned to death for harbouring
priests, iii. 402.
Wilkie, John, S.J. , chaplain to Lord
Nithsdale, converts Francis Spreule,
iv. 60.
William, first Bishop of Orkney, i.
265.
William, Bishop of Orkney, ii. 25 —
charges brought against him, ib.
William the Lion, King of Scotland,
i. 317 — his attitude towards the
York claims, 320 — founds Arbroath,
325 — excommunicated, 326 — re
ligious foundations under, 331.
William of Orange, assumes the crown
of Britain, iv. 137 — moral and
religious state of Scotland under,
152.
Williams, apostate Dominican, in the
service of Arran, ii. 161.
Willock, John, Protestant preacher,
ii. 220 — 'his controversy with Abbot
Kennedy, 260 — at the deathbed of
Mary of Guise, 287 — named super
intendent of Glasgow, 295 — his dis
pute with Friar Black, iii. 35.
Wilson, Florence, Scottish scholar,
ii. 342.
Windsor, council of, the claims of
York over the Scottish Church re
cognised at the, i. 254.
Winram, John, sub-prior of St An
drews, ii. 117 — his Protestant lean
ings, 147 — preaches at Wishart's
trial, 174 — professes Protestan
tism, 293 — named superintendent
of Fife, 295 — joint author of the
Confession of Faith, iii. 3 — resigns
his office, 221.
Winster (Dunbar), Alexander, prefect
of the Scottish mission, iv. 84 — suc
ceeds Ballantyne in the office, 115
— at the Court of James II., ib. —
his death, 116 — his report to Pro
paganda, 116 et seq. — his character,
122.
Winzet, Ninian, iii. 35 — his tractates,
37 — his challenge to Knox, 43, 49
— quits Scotland, 51 — becomes
Abbot of St James's, Ratisbon, 53
— his death, ib.
Wiseman, Nicholas, Cardinal, his
opinion as to the restoration of the
Scottish hierarchy, iv. 296, 300—
on the episcopal titles, 302 — on
the question of the metropolitan
see, 303.
Wishart, Bishop of St Andrews, i.
370.
Wishart, Robert, Bishop of Glasgow,
ii. 11 — taken prisoner by English
troops, 23 — his death, ib.
Wishart, George (the "Martyr"), his
early life, ii. 172 — his connection
with the murder of Beaton, 167 —
and with the traitorous party in
Scotland, 173 — apprehended and
tried, 174 — his execution, 175.
Witches, burned by order of Regent
Moray, iii. 204 — belief of Presby
terian ministers in, iv. 154.
Wodrow, on the growth of Popery
in the north, quoted, iv. 165,
166.
Wordsworth, Dr Charles, on the suc
cessive phases of Presbyterianism,
quoted, iv. 326.
Workington, Queen Mary lands from
Scotland at, iii. 164.
470
INDEX.
Wulstan, Bishop of Worcester, assists
to consecrate Ralph Bishop of
Orkney, i. 26.3.
Wiirzburg, Scotch monastery at, iii.
247 note— visited by Bishop Hav,
iv. 250.
Wyclifism, first appears in Scotland,
ii. 53— spread of, 55— legislation
against, ib,
Wyntoun, Andrew, chronicler, his
monody on the death of Alexander
III., i. 370 — style of his chronicle,
ii. 340.
YORK, claims supremacy over the
Scottish Church, i. 254 — and over
Orkney, 266— claims revived, 272
—supported by Rome, 282, 304—
its claim over Galloway acknow
ledged, 290 ; ii. 42— question dis
cussed at Roxburgh, i. 296 — at
Norham, 315 — at Northampton,
320 — opposes the annexation of
Galloway to St Andrews, ii. 90 —
its claim renewed by Henry VIII.
after Flodden, ib. — opening of con
ference at, iii. 174.
York, Benedict Henry, Cardinal of,
possessor of Queen Mary's veil, iii.
307 — enters the ecclesiastical state
after Culloden, iv. 191 — sketch of
his career, 285— his death, 286—
his affection for Scotland, ib.
ZIERIKSEE, Cornelius of, first Francis
can superior at Edinburgh, ii. 97.
THE END.
PRINTED BY WILLIAM BLACKWOOD AND SUMS
: