//■»A«y
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2011 with funding from
University of Toronto
http://www.archive.org/details/celtromansaxonhOOwrig
r
THE CELT, THE ROMAN, AND
THE SAXON:
A HISTORY OF THE EARLY INHABITANTS OF
BRITAIN,
DOWN TO THE CONVERSION OF THE ANGLO-SAXONS
TO CHIJISTIANITV.
ILLUSTRATED BY THE ANCIENT REMAINS BROUGHT TO LIGHT EV
RECENT RESEARCH.
BY
THOMAS WRIGHT, Esq.,
M.A., F.S.A., M.R.S.L.,
AND COBBESPONDING MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FBANCE
(Acudemie des Inscrijtions et Belles Lettre.').
WITH NUMEROUS ENGRAVINGS ON WOOD,
FIFTH EDITION.
LONDON:
KEGAN PAUL, TRENCH, TRUBNER, & CO. L^
TATERXOSTER HOUSE, CHARING CROSS ROAD.
1892.
» 2 5 8 2 4
The rights of translation and of reproduction are reserved.
TO
THE RIGHT HONOURABLE
i^Ijc (Sari of ^lotoijs
THIS VOLUME
On the EARLIEll HISTORY OF OUR POREFATHERS
IS MOST REijrECTFULLY DEDICATED HY
THE AUTHOR.
PREFACE.
There is hardly a corner in our island in wliicli the spade
or the plough does not, from time to time, turn up relics of
its earlier inhabitants, to astonish and to excite the curiosity
of the observer, who, when he looks to an ordinary history
of England, finds that the period to which such remains belong
is passed over with so little notice, that he is left with no more
information on the subject of his research than he possessed
before he opened the book. There is, in fact, no popular
history of what is termed by antiquaries the Primeval Period,
and those who are placed in the position just mentioned, if
they happen not to possess a library of expensive publications,
or to have the opportunity of consulting with those who have
made archaeology their study, are at present obliged to remain
satisfied with uncertain conjectures, and are thus led, in the
absence of the requisite elementary knowledge, to form theories
of their own which are far removed from the truth. It was
in the wish to supply a want tluis very extensively felt that
the following volume originated. Its object is to give a
sketch of that part of our history which is not generally treated
of, the period before Britain became Christian England — tlie ^/-i
pwiod, indeed, which, in the absence of much documentary -^ '*^
evidence, it is the peculiar province of the anticiuary to illus- 't^»
.1^7
vi PREFACE.
trate. Every article which, as just stated, is turned up by the
spade or the plough, is a record of that history, and it is by
comparing them together, and subjecting them to the assay of
science, that we make them tell their story. I have attempted
in the following pages to show what light the still imperfect
discoveries of the antiquary have thrown npon the condition of
tliis island, during centuries which present little more tlian a
blank in our ordinary annals.
Tlie studies of the antiquary are not so dry or so useless as
many have been led to suppose, and it is clear that this is be-
ginning to be generally understood by the widely increased
popularity which they have gained during the last few years.
His science, however, is as yet but very imperfectly developed, but
the difficulties which stood in the way of its advance are now in
a great measure cleared away, and we may hope that it is
making a steady and satisfactory progress. The great obstacle
with which the student has had to contend was, the want of
examples brought together for comparison, which led him con-
tinually to make assumptions that had no foundation, and to
appropriate incorrectly, the consequences of which are visible in
almost every work touching on the primeval antiquities of
Britain that has appeared until the last few years- This obstacle
is now rapidly giving way before the increasing facility of com-
municating knowledge, the formation of local museums, and the
greater number of good books on the subject. But there is
another danger against which the student in British archaeology
is to be especially warned ; the old scholars failed in not follow-
ing a sufficiently strict course of comparison and deduction ; but
some of the new ones run into the opposite extreme of general-
izing too hastily, and they thus form systems specious and
attractive in appearance, but without foundation in truth. Such
I am convinced is the system of archaeological periods which has
PREFACE. vii
been adopted by tlie antiquaries of the north, and which a vain
attempt has been made to introduce into this country. There is
something we may perhaps say poetical, certainly imaginative, in
talking of an age of stone, or an age of bronze, or an age of
iron, but such divisions have no meaning in history, Avhich can-
not be treated as a physical science, and its objects arranged in
genera and species. We have to do with races of mankind, and
we can only arrange the objects which come under our examina-
tion according to the peoples to whom they belonged, and as
tliey illustrate their manners and history. In fact, the divisions
alluded to are in themselves, I believe, incorrect, and so far is
the discovery of implements of stone, or of bronze, or of iron, in
themselves a proof of any particular age, that we often find them
together. It is true that there may have been a period when
society was in so barbarous a state, that sticks or stones were
the oidy implements with which men knew how to furnish them-
selves ; but I doubt if the antiquary has yet found any evidence
of such a period. Stone implements are certainly found with
articles of metal, and it may fairly be doubted if the stone im-
plements in general, found either in these islands or in the north,
belong to a period antecedent, or much antecedent, to that in Avliich
metals were in common use. In the early period to which the pre-
sent volume refers, intercommunication was slow and diflncult, and
an individual in any obscure village conld not, as at present, send
off by post to any distant town and get immediately the material he
wanted in any given quantity. It Avas thus necessary to usf;
such materials as came to hand, and there is no possible reason
why one man should not possess a weapon or a tool formed of
stone, while his richer or more fortunate contemporary had one
of iron or of bronze. This latter is the metal fomid almost ex-
clusively in what seem to be the earliest sepulchral interments ;
but we are not sufKciently acquainted Avith the manners and
sentiments of the people to whom they belonged, to say that
viii PREFACE.
tliere was not 3ome particular reasons why the deceased preferred
articles of bronze to those of other metals. Perhaps it was
looked upon as more precious. What was the origin of bronze
but the attempt to harden copper in countries where iron was
not known, or could not be procured ? it is a mixed metal, and
it is absurd to suppose tliat its use could have preceded that of
iron in countries where the latter metal was abundant. We
must also bear in mind that iron undergoes ujuch more rapid
decomposition ; and if even in interments of the Anglo-Saxon
period we very often find scarcely a trace reuiaining of what we
know were articles composed of that metal, what must be the
case with regard to similar interments made six or seven hundred
years earlier, or possibly at a still more remote period ?
I have thought it necessary to make these observations, be-
cause it will be seen, that in the following manual I have alto-
gether discarded this vague system of metallic periods. I have
treated antiquities simply according to the races to which they
belonged. In fact, I have attempted to make archaeology walk
hand-in-hand with history.*
I feel conscious, at the saniu time, that my attempt must be,
in many respects, an imperfect one, and that I have good reason
for appealing to the indulgence of my readers. My object was
to supply the want of a manual of British archaeology, where
there was really no such work existing, and it has been the
occupation of leisure moments under many disadvantages. If it
* After this pi'eface was written, I delivered at the meeting' of the British
Association a Paper on this subject of Primeval Antiquities, which was
printed in the Transactions of the Ethnological Society of London, in
which I had examined a little more carefully into the arguments which
had been for and against. I have yielded to the suggestion of friends to
give this paper, slightly revis-ed, as the first chapter in my book in the pre-
sent edition.
PREFACE. ix
help to render the science more popular, and to call the atten-
tion of Englishmen more generally to the memorials of the past
history of their country, my object will be fully accomplished.
Those who wish to pursue the subject furtlier must study the
objects themselves, and refer to some of the larger and more ex-
pensive works which may be found in public libraries. To place
such objects and works within the reach of people in general is
the chief purpose of local museums and societies. A great mass
of valuable material for the illustration of the anticjuities of the
period under our present consideration, will be found scattered
\ through the volumes of the Archceologia of the Society of Anti-
Iquaries of Loudon; but the unexperienced antiquary must pay
anore attention to the plates than to the descriptions. The best
rallection of antiquarian materials we possess at present is the
bollectanea Antiqua by Mr Roach Smith, wtiich. however, is
already becoming rare. Many good papers on primeval anti-
(uities, by Mr Roach Smith and others, Avill also be found in the
\'t>lumes of the Journal of the British Archaeological Associa-
tion, and in the Archgeological Journal published by the
Alchaeological Institute. Other valuable works for reference,
bit of a less general character, will be pointed out in the
noies to the following pages,
Tlie value of a work on antiquities depends much on its pic-
tori^ illustrations, for it is evident that descriptions of the
objeis without engravings would be very vague and unsatisfac-
tory.M have endeavoured in the present work to give engravings
of su^i objects as represent the classes, or peculiar types, with
whicliJt is necessary that the student in archaeology shouhl make
himsell acquainted. In doing this, I have to acknowledge the
kind a^l ready assistance of one or two friends, to whom the
antiquaknism of this country owes much of its progress at the
present Viy ; and, altho\igh by far the greater part of the illus-
trations \ere engraved expressly for this work, and are due to
X PREFACE.
the skilful pencil of Mr Fairholt, I have availed myself of the
otters of Dr Bruce of Newcastle, to lend me some of the cuts
from his excellent work on the Eoman Wall, and of Mr Eoach
Smith, who similarly placed at my disposal the cnts of his Collec-
tanea, of his woi'k on the antiquities of Eichborough, Eeculver,
and Lymne, and of his still more recent work on Eoman London.
A new edition of this work having been called for, I have
only here to add a few words to the foregoing remarks. A
volume like this, cx)ntaining so many facts brought together from
different sources, could hardly be expected to be free from errors.
I have done my best to discover and correct these in the v.ew
edition, and the text lias not only been revised throughout, bit
many additions have been made, chiefly arising out of discoverits
made since the appearance of the former edition, and amoig
these additions are a considerable number of new illustrati/C;
THOMAS WEIGHT.
Bgompton, December, 1874,
CONTENTS.
CHAPTER I.
PAGE
On the True Assignation of the Bronze Weapons, etc., supposed to indicate
a IJronze Age in AVestern and Northern Europe — Stone, the eai-liest
known material used for Weapons — Th3 Stone Age, Bronze Age, and
Iron Age of tlie Northern Antiquaries 1
CHAPTER 11.
Ethnological Views— Political I\Iovenients in Gaul— Caesar's first and second
Invasions— Cassivellaunus — The Britons, as described by Caesar, Strabo,
and Diodorus — Cunobeline and his Sons — Expedition of Claudius —
Conquests of the earlier Propr?etors — (Jaract:icus — Cartismandua and
Venusius — Invasion of IMona — insurrection of Boadicea — War with the
Brigantes — Campaigns of Agricohi — Total Subjection of the Island to
Rome — Enumeration of the British Tribes — Hibernia — Mannei-s of the
Britons, as described by Ancient Writers — The Druids . . . .23
CHAPTER III.
British Antiquities — Barrows — Cromlechs, and Sepulchral Chambers —
Circles ; Stonehenge — Other Monuments of Stone — N'arious descriptions
of British Barrows — Their contents — Pottery — Instruments of Stone —
Instruments of Metal — Other articles— Their value as illustrative of
History — The British Coinage — Earthworks, and supfwsed sites of
Towns and Villages .
CHAPTER IV.
Britain at the beginning of the Second Century— Towns eniunerated by
Ptolemy— Hadrian— The Wall — LoUius Urbicus ; the Wall of Antoninus
— Rebellion of the Soldiery in Britain — Albinus contends for the Purple
— Campaigns of Severus, who dies at Eburacum (I'oiA) — The Caledonians
— Carausius usurps the Purple— Allectus — Britain restored to the Em-
pire by Constantius — Constantine the Great— Revolt of Magnentius —
The Picts and Scots I'JQ;
xii CONTENTS.
CHAPTER Y.
PAGE
A Journey through Roman Britain — Londinium — Great Road from Londinium
to yegontium — A'erulamium ; Uricouium, <fcc. — Direct Northern Road
from Londinium ; Diirobrivse, Lindum, Danum, Eburacum, Isurium—
Passage of tlie two Walls— Stations on the Wall — 13ranch to Luguballium
and Blatum Bvilgium — Eastern Road ; Camulodunum, Camboricum —
From Londinium to Calleva — Branch to Corinium and Glevum ; Isca
and Maridunum — From Glevum by Magna to Deva, and thence through
Coccium to the North — Cross Roads — Salinaj and other Towns — The
Western Road, from Calleva to yorbiodunum, Durnovaria, and Isca
Uumnoniorum — Aquae Solis — ^ The trajectux to Wales, and the Sarn
Helen — The Road on the youthern Coast ; Yenta Belgarum, Clausentum,
Portus Magnus, Regnum, Anderida, Portus Lemanis .... 145
CHAPTER VI.
Rnman Town in Britnin— Its Walls, Towers, and Gates — Materials, and
Modes of Construction — The Houses — Their Plan and Arrangement —
The Tessellated Pavements and Frescoed Walls — Method of Warming
tlie Houses ; the Hypocausts — the Baths — Windows and Roofs — Distri-
bution of the Houses in Streets — Public Buildings ; Temples, Basilica^,
Theatres, Amphithearres — The Suburbs and Biu'ial-places — Sanitary
Arrangements ; Sewers, Rubbish-pits — The Language of Britain . '. 171
CHAPTER VTI.
The Cnuntrj' — Roman Roads and their Construction — 'Milliaria; the Roman
Mile — Bridges — HoTnan Villas; Woodchester, Bigiior, &c. — Tessellated
Pavements, and the Subjects represented on them— Rustic Villages-
Agriculture and Farming — Country Lite ; the Chase — British Dogs . 221
CHAPTER VIII.
Manufactures of tl>e RomaTis in Britain — Pottery— The Upchurch Ware —
Dymchurch — The Potteries at Durobrivfe — The Samian Ware — Romano-
Salopian Wares — Other Varieties— Terra-cottas — Roman Glass — Kim-
lueridge Coal Manufacture — Mineral Coal — Metals — The Roman Iron-
works in Britain ; Sussex, the Forest of Dean, <bc. — Tin and Lead —
Other Metals — Bronze — The Arts ; Sculpture — Medicine ; the Oculists'
, Stamps — Trades ; a Goldsmith's Sign 25'J
CHAPTER IX
Ethnological Character of the Roman Population of Britain — Countries from
which it was derived — The Auxiliary Troojjs — Names and Birthplaces
of Individuals— Traces of Languages ; Inscribed Pottery; the Roundels
found at Colchester — Debased Latinity — Remains of the British Popu-
lation 30(3
CHAPTER X.
Rcligioiis Worship of the Romans in Britain — Roman chief Deities ; Jupiter,
Mars, Apollo, Minerva, Ceres, cfcc. — The eight Deities— Lesser Deities ;
Silvanus, J<]sculapius — Grecian and Eastern Deities ; the Tyrian Her-
cules, Mithras, Serapis— The Nymphs and Genii, Fortune, and Deified
Personifications — Deities of the Auxiliary Races ; the Dete Matres, Vite-
res, or Vitris, Belatucadrus, Cocidius, Mogoutis, &c. — Did Christianity
prevail or exist in Roman Britain ? 313
CONTEXTS. xiii
CHAPTER Xr.
Modes of Sepulture in Roman Britain — Cremation and Urn-Burial — Modes
of Interment — Burial of the Body entire— Sarcophagi — Coffins of Baked
Clay, Lead, . and Wood — Barrows — iSepulchral Chambers — Inscriptions
and their Sentiments — Various Articles deposited with the Dead —
Fulgor Divom 3oT
CHArTER XII.
Domestic Life among the Romans in Britain as Illustrated by their Remains
— Dress and Personal Ornaments — The Toilette — The Household ; Fur-
niture and Utensils — Female Occupations— Cutlery — Styli — Scales —
Ornamental Articles— AVeapons, &c. . . .... 301
CHAPTER XIII.
The Roman Province — Its Divisions and Officers — The Military Force —
Centurial and other Inscriptions — Towns and their Municipal Constitu
tion — The Coinage- -Roman Coins relating to Britain — Spurious Coin-
age— Different methods of Hoarding Money 416
CHAPTER XIY.
Declining State of the Roman Empire after the age of Julian — Theodosius
sent to Bi'itain — Revolt and Career of Maximvis — Stilicho — Marcus and
Gratian revolt in Britain — The Usurper Constantine— -Honorius — Britain
independent of the Empire and harassed by the Northern Barbarians —
The Britons receive assistance from Rome — The last Roman Legion
withdrawn— The Angles and Saxons come in — The Angles settle in
Northumbria — The Jutes in Kent — Hengest and Horea— iEUa in Sussex
— Cerdic arrives in Hampshire — Essex and the Angles — Mission of St
Augustine and Conversion of the Anglo-Saxons to Christianity . . 440
CHAPTER XV.
Anglo-Saxon Antiquities — Barrows or Graves, and the general Character of
their Contents — Arms^Personal Ornaments ; Fibulae, &c. — Anglo-Saxon
Jewellery — Pottery — Glass— O'i.^sr ilJes found in the Barrows
Bowls, Buckets, &c. — Coins — Early Anglo-Saxon Coinage . . . 405
CHAPTER XVI.
Anglo-Saxon Settlement — Division of the Land — Population of the Country
and of t-he Towns — Continuance of the Roman Municipalities — Traces
of Municipal Privileges in the Anglo-Saxon Towns ; Canterbury,
Rochester, Dover, Exeter, London 605
CHAPTER XVII.
Celtic Establishments — Strath-Cluyd, Cornwall, "Wales — Early Sepulchral In-
scrijDtions found in the two latter Countries 525
Appendix I. — The Itineraries and Lists of Towns :
Itinerary of Antoninus 531
Itinerary of Richard of Cirencester 533
The Ravenna List of Towns 536
Appendix II.— Roman Potters' Marks 541
LIST OF PLATES.
KOMAN BRITISH POTTERY ♦•^ f«ce Title
3iAP OF BRITAIN UNDER TUP. ROMANS . . to (uce Apueiidix
STONEHENGE, FROM THE W.N.W ^^ ^'^^-^ P^^S^ SO
RU1N6 OF THE GATE AT LYMNE . . . . „. k?^
PART OF THE WALLS OF A TOWN . . .
FOUNDATIONS OF ROMAN HOUSES AT ALDBOKOUGH
THE PROCESS OF FRESCO-PAINTING ....
HYPOCAUST IN THE ROMAN VILLA AT WOODCHESTEK
CORNER OF THE CRYPTOPORTICUS, ROMAN VILLA AT
BIGNOR . .
TESSELLATED PAVEMENTS AT WROXETER, NO. 1
„ „ „ NO. 2 V
ROMAN POTTERY FROM CASTOR AND THE UPCHURCH
MARSHES
CASTOR, NORTH AMPTONsriRS {Ddrobflvce)
ROMAN POTTERY KILN, AT SIBSON
ROMAN potter's KILN AT CASTOR {Burohnvo)
GROUP OF SAMIAN WARE FOUND IN ENGLAND .
ROMAN TOMBS
ANGLO-SAXON WEAPONS, ETC
ANGLO-SAXON FIBULA
ANGLO-SAXON JEWELLERY
ISO
192
i?')3
2;i6
2i3
241)
250
260
2()3
203
207
273
303
470
478
48G
THE BRITON'S.
CHAPTER I.
On the True Af=signation of the Bronze Weapons, etc., supposed to indicate
a Bronze Age in "Western and Northern Europe — Stone, the earliest
known material used for "Weapons — The Stone Age, Bronze Age, and
Iron Age of the Northern Antiquaries,
Within a few years there has come into existence, I will
not say a new science, but certainly a new and very extraordi-
nary field for scientific inquiry. Not long ago, antiquaries
limited their knowledge of the remains of human industry in
this part of the world to a few generations, at most, before the
(late when we are made acquainted with its inhabitants by the
Roman historians, and everybody was satisfied with the biblical
account, that mankind had existed upon this earth somewhat
more than six thousand years. It is but recently that we were
all surprised by the announcement that flint implements, which
had evidently been formed by man's hand, had been found in
the geological formation known by the name of drift. As soon
as this discovery became an accepted fact, and more general
attention was called to the subject, it was discovered that these
fiint implements, instead of being rare (as we might perhaps
have expected), were, in many parts where the drift was exam-
ined, so abundant as to imply the evidence of a considerable
population at a period of course preceding the formation of the
(h"ift itself. These implements present a great uniformity in
shape, and to some degree in size, — at all events there are only
two or three varieties, — and it is remarkable that, while the
fossil bones of various animals are found in the same drift, there
lias been as yet no authentic discovery of Innnan bones ; yet
tnere ajjpears to be no room for doubt that these implements
B
2 THE BRITOXS. [ciiAr. i.
are really the work of man. Of course, according to the opin-
ions of geologists on tlie age of the drift, this discovery would
carry back the existence of man on earth to an immense dis-
tance beyond tlic biblical date, and it leaves ns for speculation
and theory a period of far greater extent than the whole
liistorical period.
The question of the Antiquity of Man became thus an attract-
ive, and even an exciting, study. It happened that tlie nortli-
crn — the Scandinavian — antiquaries, wliose peculiar fault, if
any, is a spirit of too hasty generalising, had already started an
ingenious theory in relation to these pre-historic times, accord-
ing to wdiich tliese were divided into three periods or ages,
distinguished by the names of stone age, bronze age, and iron
age. During the first of these periods, it is supposed th.at
metal was unknown to man, and that stone was the best
material he had for the manufacture of weapons or of other
implements for cutting or hammering ; the second was cliarac-
terised by the use of bronze as the only metal; in the tliird,
bronze had been superseded for these purposes by iron. Tliis
system of periods Avas eagerly embraced by the new scliool of
pre-historic antiquaries, who have even refined upon it and
divided at least the first two periods into subdivisions.
It is this dark and mysterious pre-historic penod whicli
lias furnished tlie subject treated in a handsome volume pub-
lished by Sir John Lubbock,* Avhich treats successively on
the system of periods or ages just mentioned, on th^ tumuli of
the pre-historic times, on the lake-habitations, shell-mounds,
and caves, on the more general subject of the Antiquity of Man
himself, and on the manners of modern savages, which the
author employs very judiciously to illustrate those of the savages
of pre-historic ages, for absolute savages at all times bear a
certain resemblance to one another. I will only add, as to the
book itself, that it is a well-w^'itten and well-arranged work,
characterised equally by purity of language and by its singidar
clearness and perspicuity, while it presents a view of the whole
subject which surprises us by its comprehensiveness, without
wearying us with what too often constitutes comprehensiveness,
a close dry mass of enumerations of facts. I take Sir John
Lubbock's work only from one point of view — so far as its
talented author treats of the system of periods — a system which
* ' Prehistoric Times, as illustrated by Ancient Remains, and the Mau-
H'Ts and Customs of Modern Savages. ' By Sir John Lubbock, Bart.,
F.R.S. 8vj. AVilliams and Norgate. I860.
CHAP. I.] TPIE ANTIQUITY OF MAN. 3
it is tolerably well known that I, in common with antiquaries
of some eminence in their science, reject altogether, and look
upon as a mere delusion, and some parts of the first chapters
of my friend's book are aimed at me ; that is, they are directed
against opinions which I have expressed and which are here
rightly put into my mouth, and I am glad of the opportunity
of explaining my reasons rather more fully. It will be undei*-
stood by everybody that whatever strictures I have to make
are directed, not against Sir John Lubbock's writings, but
against the opinions of the school of pre-historic archaeologists
ivhich he has adopted, and which are here stated more fairly
and distinctly than in any othcx Avork with which I ant
acquainted.
I am by no means inclined to impugn hastily the general
conclusions at which men of science seem now arriving upon
the great question of the antiquity of man — it is a subject in
regard to which I look forward with anxious interest to the
increase of our knowledge, certain that the ultimate result must
be truth. Magna ed Veritas, et pi'covalebit. But L complain of
the treatment which the science of archaeology has hitherto
received at their hands. There was a cry some time ago — and
nobody joined in it more heartily than myself — that a close
alliance should exist between archiEology and geology ; but this
was to have been a fair and equal alliance, in which the geolo-
gist should accept the conclusions of archaeology on the same
footing as the archaeologist is expected to receive the opinions
of the geologist. Instead of this, the geologist seems to have
considered that the Science he had thus to give his hand to is a
vague and uncertain one, — he has created a sort of archaeology
of his own, made in the first place to suit his own theories, and
he takes only the advice of those who will give him an opinion
which is in accordance with a foregone conclusion, and this is
often quite contrary to the teachings of archaeological science.
Archaeology, as a science, has now reached too high a position
to be treated with so little respect. But let us go on to tlu
more especial subject now before me.
Sir John Lubbock alleges that ' Mr Wright sees nothing in
Great Britain which can be referred to ante-Roman tunes' (p. 35);
and u])on this he remarks (p. 36), 'But if we are to refer
not only the bronze implements, but also those of stone, to the
Roman period, what implements, we may ask, does Mr Wright
;«. suppose were used by the ancient Britons before the arrival of
Caesar? It would be more reasonable to deny the existence of
4 THE BRITONS. [chap. r.
ancient Britons at once, than thus to deprive them, as it were,
of all means ^ of obtaining subsistence.' What I have said on
this subject must have been strangely misunderstood, or I may
have explained myself badly ; for 1 am entirely unconscious of
having ever uttered an opinion which could bear the interpret-
ation here given to it. I have said, and I still say, that [ do .^
not believe we have many — perhaps any — monuments of im-
portance much older than the Roman period, and that such
ancient remains as are supposed to be older than the Eoman
period bear no characteristics which would enable us to ascribe -
them to any particular date. I have never pretended to deprive
the Britons of the use of stone, — it would not be in my power ;
but I say that stone was also in use for the same purpose in
Roman and Saxon times, and that the mere presence of a stone
implement does not prove that the deposit was British any more
than Roman. Stone, of various kinds, is a very ready and
convenient material for purposes such as the stone implements
of antiquity evidently served, and it is found in use in Western
Europe even in the middle ages. Stone implements have often
been found on Roman sites in this island ; they have been found
in Saxon graves in Kent, and I have myself found flint flakes^'
evidently placed there by the hand of man, in Saxon graves in
the Isle of Wight, perfectly resembling those of which the
o-eoloo'ists have talked so much of late. The Abbe Cochet
found similar flint flakes in Roman graves in Normandy, so ar-
ranged as to leave no doubt that they were placed there inten-
tionally.
Sir John, indeed, acknowledges that implements in stone
were in use in Roman times, but it was not so nnich a.ditter-
ence between the poor and the rich, as he puts it (the structure ^
of society was altogether different from that of modern times),
as between ditterent localities. It would be very wrong to sup-
pose that the social condition of Britain under the Romans was
uniform in cultivation and condition throughout the province.
There were no doubt ' savages ' in wild and retired parts of
the island, as there have been in much more r6cent times, and
communication between distant localities, except on the lines oi
the great roads, was slow and precarious. People must thus
have been frequently exposed to the inconvenience of falling
short of metals, which, moreover, were probably always expens-
ive, and then they would be obliged to have recourse to stones,
the use of which would thus be habitual. People, under this
CHAP. I.J IMPLEMENTS OF STONE AND BRONZE. 6
state of society, could not 2:0 to obtain tlieir flint implements at
distant manufactories, but must either have made them individu-
ally for themselves, or, at the most, there may have been a man
ill each villao-e or rural district who was more skilful in making'
them than his neighbours, and supplied them to those who were
able or willing to purchase. In this manner there must have
been, throuohout the land, at the same time, a vast variety in
the form and style of flint implements, according to local taste
or individual caprice, so that it would be absurd to consider
difterence of form and character as a proof of difference of date.
In primitive times diversity, and not uniformity, was usually
the rule, and sometimes this diflerence of form and design be-
came almost a family distinction. Among the Anglo-Saxons,
long after they had risen above the character of savages, the
different tribes were distinguished by different forms of personal
ornaments, and we know that in much later times the clans of
the Scottish highbinders have been similarly distinguished by
the patterns of their plaids.
But, enough of stone for the present — let us proceed to
bronze, which forms the grand corner-stone of the edifice of this
system of periods. We may, perhaps, consider as the most im-
portant of these objects of bronze the swords, because they
present a 'greater number of peculiarities of form than any of
the other classes, and the circumstances connected with their
discovery seem at a first glance of the subject to suggest more
difficulty in identifying them with the Romans ; I shall, there-
fore, take them as the special object of investigation, but the
arguments I shall use with regard to them apply with still more
force to the other objects made of the same metal. I give four
examples of tliese swords in the cut No. 1, three of which are
taken from Sir John Lubbock's ' Pre-historic Times,' as the
readiest and most convenient book to quote. It will be seen
that there are here three forms of blades, of which figs. 2 and 3
are what are commonly called leaf-shaped, the blade of fig. 1
tapers from the hilt to the point, while the two edges of the
blade in fig. 4 are nearly parallel. They are all distinguished
i)y the peculiarity of being ribbed. The swords, as will be
seen, present two descriptions of handler, which were either of
the same material as the blade and rivetted to it, or of material
of a more perishable nature, and attached to the blades in the
same manner as our old knife-handles. These swords, it must
be agreed, do not present any varieties of forms which might be
THE BRITONS.
[ciiAr. I,
No. 1. Examples of Bronze Swords.
supposed to have ovig-iiiated among- different peoples nnar-
quainted with one another, but they are perfectly identical in
character, yet they have been found in almost all parts of
Europe. Of the four examples here g-iven, jSTo, 1 was found in
the valley of the Somme in Prance ; 3, in the lake of Neuf-
ohatel in Switzerland ; 3, in Sweden • and 4, in some part of
Scandinavia, but I am not aware of the exact locality.* No
one could doubt for a moment the identity in form of the
handles of figs. 1, 2, and 4.
Sir John asserts that ' bronze weapons are never found asso-
ciated with coins, pottery, or other relics of Roman origin ; '
he then proceeds to quote a statement of mine to the effect that
on all the sites of ruined Eoman towns these other objects are
found scattered about rather abundantly ; and he adds some-
what triumphantly, ' We may assume, then, on the authority of
Mr Wright himself, that, if all these bronze arms were really of
Eoman origin, many of them would have been found from time
to time in conjunction with other Eoman remains.' I can
admit of no such assumption as arising from the facts I have
stated ; and I am sorry to be obliged, to say that this remark
only shows that my friend, in common Avitli the advocates of
this system of periods generally, is but imperfectly acquainted
with the archaeological conditions of the question. The reason
we do not find bronze swords under the circumstances which he
* In the noble museum of my friend Mr Joseph Maj^er. in Liverpco!,
there is one of these leaf-shaped, bronze swords, which was found in Hun-
gaiy ; it came from the collection of the late Count .Pulszty.
CHAP, i] BRONZE AND IRON SWORDS. 7
insists U])Ou, is :i vory simple one, easily explained, and applies
to iron swords ecpially with bronze swords. The Uonians did
not bnry their weapons with tlie dead, and they took g-reat care
of them, espeeially of, the sword, while alive. Even in the last
strugg-les of the empire, when the Romans must sometimes have
been obUu'ed to leave their Aveapons behind them, the barbarians, ^
amon^- whom we know that a sword was an object of inestiin-
able value, took veiy <i,-ood care to carry them away. The con-
si'(pr.'nce of this is that a Roman sword m iron is one of the
r.irest objects of antiquarian discovery. I remember, within
my own observation, hardly a single instance of one haviiiu'
b(;en found in Roman Britain, and not above two swords sup-
])osed to have been found here, and it is my impression that tlie
bronze handle of one of the latter presented a considerable re-
semblance, in its style of ornarr.ent, to those of some of the
i)ronze swords found in Scandinavia. Duruig the whole of our
excavations at Wroxeter, which have tilled a considerable musevun
Avith articles of Roman fabrication, we have never met with the
smallest fragment of a Rouuui sword, nor do [ remember a
single instance of such a Hud on any site of a Roman town or
villa in this island. In one or two cases in the West of Eng-
land, as in the very remarkable discoveries at Hod Hill in
Dorsetshire,* bundles of unfinished iron blades, which looked
like swords, have been discovered under circumstances which
appeared to me to show that they had been government stores
on their way to some imperial manufactory where the finish was
to be given to them ; other antiquaries thought they were not
swords at all, and I think they may be right ; but it is a very
remarkable circumstance that among the Roman antiquities
found at Hod Hill there was one undoubted iron sword-blade,
aiid this was in eveiy I'cspect an exact copy of one of the swords
in bronze, of which we are now speaking, a proof beyond doubt
that the latter were at that time well known. f This Roman
sword-blade is represented in the cut annexed (No. 2), and will
be seen to possess fhe characteristic leaf-shape, with the ribs,
and the holes for the rivets, by .vliich the handle was fixed on.
* See Roach Sinith's 'Collectanea Antiqua,' vol. vi. p. 1.
t I may remark that, to my kiio\vled<;e, one or two examples have been
f(juii(l in this island of the so-called ' celt ' cast in iron, instead of bronze,
but of course the casting- in bronze was the easier process. It is a proof,
however, that, when these implements were made, iron and bronze were
both in use. In my friend Mr Roach Smith's museum, now in the British
jNIuseum, there was a remarkable Roman spear-head, of the bronze tijpe^
but ii iron ; it \\ is found in the Sommc at Abbeville.
THE BRITONS. [ciiai-. i.
No. 2. Blade of a Roman Sword.
The fact of no Koman swords in iron l)eing found, woidd be
rather in favour of the bronze swords being- Eoman. Again,
Sir John Lubbock gives as one of his arguments against me the
fact tliat the bronze and iron swords and other implements are
not found mixed together in the same locality. It seems to
me that this is exactly what we might expect, especially in
the case of the swords. These, as I have just observed, were
valuable articles, and were probably, at least in the provinces,
in the possession of few individuals, except the military. The
inhabitants of a lacustrine village, for instance, were not likely
to be in possession of a sword, unless they had stolen it, and
whence would they steal it ? From some soldier belonging to
the nearest military post. I am sure that Sir John Lubbock
will allow that it has never been the custom to arm any corps
of troops with a variety of weapons — if their swords were bronze,
they were all bronze^ if iron, all iron. The discovery, therefore,
of weapons in any particular place would only necessarily show
that it was the weapon with which the detachment of Roman
troops stationed in that neighbourhood — or, at least, nearest to
it — were armed. But I think that it is stated rather rashly
that bronze swords are not found with iron swords ; for in the
very rare instances of the discovery of Roman iron swords found
in Britain, in, I believe, almost a majority of cases, they have
been found associated with bronze swords. A few years ago a
Roman sword in a bronze scabbard, the blade appearing from
the rust to be of iron, was dredged up from the Thames, along
with a very fine specimen of the well-known bronze leaf-shaped
sword, and a large stone celt, all which were in the museum of
the late Lord Londesborough ; * and a similar iron sword in a
bronze scabbard was found together with a bronze sword in the
river below Lincoln, at a spot where a bronze circular shield had
previously been found. t The discovery, in one or two instances,
of a mass of bronze implements, with no mixture of iron, leads
* The iron sword is eng^raved and described in Iloach Smith's ' Collec-
tanea Antiqua,' vol. iii. p. 67.
t Roach Smith, ib. p. 68.
CHAP. I.] SWORDS OF BRONZE AND IRON. 9
only to the conclusion that they had formed the stock-in-trade
of some dealer in bronze implements, or that they had been a
consignment of such articles lost on the way. But of this I
shall say more.
I must, however, state g-enerally that the archaeological fact is
that, instead of our 7Lot finding the bronze swords in juxta-
position with Roman remains, in every case where they have
l)een found in Britain or Gaul, where the details of the dis-
covery have been carefully observed, it has occurred under
circumstances which lead to the strongest presumption of their
being Roman. A. bronze sword, of the usual leaf-shaped type,
is stated to have been found at the Roman station of Ardoch
in Scotland, on the wall of Antoninus, and there appears no
reason to doubt the accuracy of the statement.* But, to come
farther south, it is well known to the archaeologist that the great
treasury of the antiquities of Roman London — and of mediaeval
London also — is the mud of the river Thames, and within the
limits of the town I believe that no object has been found that
could claim an earlier date than Roman. This is just the place
where objects of all kinds would be deposited by accidents, such
as boats upsetting in the transit, people falling in and being
drowned, and the dropping into the water of objects of various
kinds which would sink by their weight. Now swords have
been found in the Thames at London, and I should imderrate
the number in saying a few, but they were nearly all of bronze,
and leaf-shaped in form, which might almost be taken to show
that this bronze sword was most in fashion among the Romans
in London. Certain it is, that my friend Mr Roach Smith,
who has examined these Roman antiquities of London more
extensively and deeply than anybody else, and whom I have no
hesitation in saying that I regard as the first authority on the
antiquities of the Roman period in England or even on the
continent, is convinced, equally with me, that the bronze swords
are of Roman manufacture or origin. f Discoveries of the axes,
chisels, and other implements of bronze, have been much more
frequent, and in positions wdiich speak still more strongly of
their Roman character. Thomas Hearne, who first called
attention to these objects more than a century ago, took it for
* Stuart's ' Caledonia Antiqua,' second edit. pi. v., ^vhere this sword
is en<rraved. I make the remark, because Sir John Lubbock expresses a
doubt upon it : — ' Yet Mr Wright himself has only been able to give me
one doubtful instance of this kind' {p. 12).
f See, for ^ome remarks on this subject, his ' Catalogue of London Anti-
quities,' p. 80.
10 THE BRITONS. [chap. i.
o-ranted that they wore Roman, l)ut he unfortunately gave it as
liis opinion that they represented the Roman celtis (a technical
/ word for a sort of chisel), and, in tlic low ebb at which arch;i3o-
log'ical knowledge has stood from his time down to the present
generation, antiquaries seem to liaA'e blindly fallen into the mis-
take that the name celt {cdtis) was e([uivalent to Celtic, and
that it meant that they belonged to the ancient Britons. In
this blunder solely, I believe, originated the notion that these
' celts ' are not Roman.
Let lis now cross the Channel to our neighbours, and see
what is the case in Gaul. Prance has undoubtedly produced by
fai' the ablest, the soundest, and the most judicious antiquaries
of modern times; and I believe that they have all regarded the
bronze swords, equally with the other bronze implements, as
Roman. I will c|uote the authority of Monsieur de Caumont,
to which I am sure that nobody who knows anything of archpe-
ology will object. In his Conrs cV /hitiqniU'iH Moniunentales, De
Caumont, in speaking of these so-called ' celts,' says, ' But we
tind also very frequently these bronze axes in places covered
with Roman ruins ; I have acquired the certainty of this by my
own observations and by the information I have collected in my
travels.' * Again, the same distinguished scholar, in speaking
of the bronze swords, after noticing the opinion of a previous
writer who thought that the Gauls had derived the use of these
swords from the Greeks, goes on to say, ' At all events, I must
not conceal from you the fact that the bronze swords have been
found sometimes along with objects of Roman manufacture,
which would seem to annoinice a ditierent origin.' f
I Avill go back a little farther among the antiquaries of
France to produce not only opinions, but facts, such as I think
ought to set the whole question at rest. At the beginning of
the present century flourished the able antiquary Antoine Mon-
)gez, one of the most celebrated members of the Institute of
France, a man distinguished for his science and learning, and
for his judicious use of them. On the 16th of Prairial, an 9
(for we are still in the days of the Republic), according to our
reckoning the 5th of June, 1801, the ' citoyen ' Mongez read at
* Mais on trouve aussi tris fvtquemment des Laches en bronze dans des
emplacements converts de mines Romaines ; j'en ai acquis la certitude par
moi-meme et par les renseij^nements que j'ai recueillis dans mes voyages. —
Be Caumont^ Cours cV AHtiqnitds Monument ales^ torn. i. p. 232.
\ Toutefois je ne dois pas vous laisser ignorer que les epees en bronze
ont ete trouvees parfois avec des objets de fabrique Komaine, ce qui paroi-
trait annoncer une autre origiue. — Ih.^ p. 239.
CHAP. I.] BiiO.XZE SWORDS IX FRANCE. 11
tlie Institute, bcTore ^vhat was then called the Class of Litera-
ture and It'ine Arts, but which is now represented by tlie
Academie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres, a memoir on an
ancient bronze sword, which had been found with the skeleton
of a man and hoi'se, in a turbary {tonrbiere) near Corbie, at
Hailly, in the valley of the Albert, a tributary of the Somme.
In this memoir, which is published in the volume of the papers
read before the class,* this sword is described, and hg'ured in
an engTaving ; it is the sword represented in fig. 1, in our cut
No. 1, and is entirely of bronze, blade and handle. The object
of Mongez was chietiy to analyse the bronze of which this sword
Avas made ; but he also enters into the question of what manu-
facture it might be, and, after careful discussion, he arrives at
the conclusion that these bronze swords were all lloman. On
the Sth Frimaire, an 10 of the Republic, or the 29th of No-
vember, 1 801, in our reckoning, M. Mongez read another paper
en three bronze swords which had been recently found near
Abbeville, and which resembled the other so closely that he
thought it unnecessary to have them engraved. f Mongez re-
considered the question, and again pronounced them Roman —
je les crols liomabies.
After Mongez had read his Memoires on the bronze swords
before the Institute, his opinion received a singularly remark-
able confirmation in a more exact and complete account of the
«?ircumstances of the discoveries, which he obtained from a very
zealous and able antiquary of Abbeville, M. Traulle. The
bronze sword, as just stated, was found in the turbary at Heilly
along with the skeletons of a man and a hoi'se, and by the
sword were four brass coins of the Emperor Caracalla, who, as
is well known, reigned from a.d. 311 to 217. + This sword,
therefore, was that of a Roman cavalry soldier, not older, and
perhaps a little later, than this reign, who had sunk in the bog
to which the turbary had succeeded. The history of two of the
other swords, found in a turbary at Pequigny, near Abbeville,
was, if anything, still more curious. A large boat was found,
which had evidently sunk, and in it Avere several skeletons.
One of these had on his head a bronze casque, or helmet, accom-
panied witli the remains of the other accoutrements of a soldier.
Tlie bronze sword lay by his side, and with it some Roman
coins, some of Avhich, if not all, were middle brass of the Em-
peror Maxentius, who reigned from 306 to 312. § Another
* 'Memoires de I'lnstitut Nationalc des Science et Arts.' — Litterature
el Beaux Arts, torn. v. p. 187.
t lb., p. 49G. :;: lb., note on p. 193. § lb., note on p. 501.
12 THE BRITONS. [chap. i.
similar sword was found in tlie turbary outside the boat, whicli
would appear to have been sunk in a skirmish after some of its
(;rew had been killed in it. We learn here that Roman soldiers,
in the wars and troubles which agitated Gaul in the third and
fourth centuries after Christ, were armed with these bronze
swords, which some have so in(2;eniouslv supposed to have been
brought into this island by the Phoenicians, some seventeen or
eighteen hundred years before the Christian era. From the
time of Mongez, the French antiquaries have generally regarded
the bronze swords as Roman.
I have thus crept on from one little, though significant, fact
to another, until it seems to me tolerably clear that they all
point to one conclusion, that the bronze swords found so often
in different parts of western and northern Europe are Roman ;
that is, that they were all either of Roman manufacture, or, at
the least, copied from Roman models. 1 consider that this
evidence is sufficiently strong, but still it will be worthy of
inquiry, whether it be confirmed by pictorial delineations on
Roman monuments. I have no doubt that with a little labour
we might bring together a mass of corroborative evidence of
this description which would be quite irresistible, but I regret
to say that pressing engagements of a ditterent character will
not at present allow me to undertake that labour myself to its
full extent. I think, however, that I can produce a few very
satisfactory examples of it — and I will oidy take them in two
classes of such monuments.
First, as to the sculptures on stone, the figure of a Roman
soldier, generally on horseback, is a common adjunct to sepul-
chral inscriptions found in the Roman cemeteries. Unfor-
tunately, the soldier usually has his sw^ord by his side in its
sheath, and although the shape of the sheath would lead us to
believe that they did hold blades of the diflerent known forms
of the bronze swords, yet we cannot insist upon it. If the
sheath were made of the form of the blade of a leaf-shaped
sword, of course the blade could not be draw^n out ; it is there-
fore represented in one uniform shape, distinguished only from
any ordinary scabbard by being short. However, I feel con-
vinced that I have seen one or two of these sculptures in which
the Roman soldier held the sword drawn, and in which it w^as
clearly leaf-shaped ; but I cannot at this moment put my hands
upon them. If any one, however, will take the trouble to look
over the plates of that readiest of all books of reference, the
pere Montfaucon's Aiitlqidte E.rpHqnea, he must, I think, be
convinced of the absurditv of denying that these swords are
CHAP. I.]
ROMAN SWORDS.
13
Roman. In the sculptures on the arch of Constantine at Rome,
al)out contemporary with the bronze swords found near Abbe-
ville, and described by Mongez, the Roman soldiers are evidently
armed with the leaf-shaped swords, as well as with the other
forms shown in our cut No. 1, a circumstance which brings
into immediate relation the forms and the metal.*
But I will g-o farther from Italy, and give examples from an
important work very recently printed, — I mean the Exploration
sclentlfique de l" Alger'ie, published at the expense of the French
government, — which are represented on Roman monuments in
another part of the w^orld. In the archaeological part, the work
of M. Delamare, engravings are given of a number of Roman
monuments of
various kinds
found at the town
of Constantine in
the province of
Algeria, the Ro-
man Constantina,
representing the
still older Numid-
ian town of Cirta.
Most of these
sculptures are
rather rude, and
belong probably
to the time of the
emperor from
whom the town
took its second
name. On one
of them, t we have
a re})resentation
in sculpture of
the accoutrements of a soldier, with the figure of a sword on
* I will merely refer to this great work, torn. iv. plate vii. fig. 3, for a
Roman soldier from a sculpture at Narbonne, with the leaf-shaped sword
by his side ; to pi. xxiv., where there are several of our swords a little
varied in ornament ; to pi. lii., representing a combat in which the Romans
have their swords in their scabbards, but the handles seem clearly to re-
present the scroll-formed ornament represented in our cut No. 1 ; to pi.
^Ixix. and Ixx., where the swords are the same represented in our cut,
though not leaf-shaped ; and to the Supplement, tom. iv. pl. xv. and pi.
XXX. In the work itself, tom. iv. pl. xiii., the Etruscan soldiers are repre-
sented as armed with the leaf-shaped sword. In fact, it was the Italian
swnrd, derived, no doubt, from the Greeks.
+ Ilepi'esented in plate 156, fig. 3, of the work in question.
/
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2. Fig. 3.
No. 3. Roman Swords from Algeria.
14
THE BHITOXS.
[chap. I.
eacli side — the swords are represented in oar cut No. 3, figs. 1
and 2. Another sculptured monument, found also at Con-
stantine,* contains several fig-ures of swords, one of which I
give in the same cut, fig*. 3. One of these swords is distinctly
Ieaf-sha):)ed, and they are all characterised, as clearly as such
things are usually drawn in these rude Eoman sculptm-es, by
the ribs which are found on the bronze swords. The handles
are cleai'ly intended to be represented as fastened on in the
same way as those of the bronze swords, and fig. 3 is no doubt
intended to represent the same termination of the hilt as is
shown in figs. 1, 2, and 4, of our cut No, 1. In the other two,
this termination is replaced by a ball, but the rest of the
liaiulles are quite identical.
I will next proceed to a class of monuments of, if possible,
still greater importance in the discussion of our subject, the
llonian coinage. The coins of what are called by numismatists
the consular series, are remarkable for the interesting illustra-
tions they give us of Roman costume and Eoman manners, and
are, on that account, well worthy of the study of the antiquary.
Examples of swords are found on coins of the Servilia, Carisia,
Plfetoria, I'erentia, and jMinutia families, which evidently repre-
sent the ordinary forms of the bronze swords which we are
discussing. I give as an example a well-known coin of the
Servilia geus.-\ The obverse represents the head of the goddess
Flora, with the inscription flora . pkimvs, meaning that in
giving the Eloralia
that year, the mem-
ber of this family in
whose honour the
coin was struck, and
whose name is given
on the reverse as
C . SEllVEIL . C . F. ; ^'^- *• <^om of C. Servilius.
i.e., Cains Servilius, the son of Cains, stood first. On this
reverse we see two military figures, standing face to face, with
drawn swords, and these plaiidy have the same ribbed leaf-shaped
blades which are represented in our cut No. 1, The man in
whose honour this coin was struck was a contemporary of Julius
Caesar. The second example of these coins I give belongs to the
Minucia family, and to a member of that family named in the
* lb., plate 128, figs. 7 and 8.
t It is ccjpied from a beautiful example of the coin in the cabinet of my
friend Mr C. Roach Smith.
CHAP. I.J
BRONZE SPEAR- HE ADS.
iO
No. 5. Coiji of Quintus Thcrmus.
inscription Q . theum .
MF, C^uintus Therm us,
the son of Marcus.*
Three men are here en-
aaued in combat, one
apparently a Roman proy
tectmg- a fallen com-
rade ao-ainst his foe,
whose differeune of costume probably denotes a foreigner. f
The swords of t!.e two Romans are evidently identical in form
with that represented by fig. 4, in our cut No. 1 . Thus an
examination of this best of all evidence, the coinage, leaves us
no room for doubting that the characteristic sword of republican
Rome was actually this same sword to which the pre-historic
archaeologists have been ascribing such a remote date in our
islands.
In these coins we trace, curiously enough,
all the forms of weapons of bronze found in
this country. The spear-heads, drawn small,
are like spear-heads in general, but nobody
doubts that the Roman spear-head Avas made
of bronze. We trace here the fii'-ures of the
ro\md bronze shields formed of concentric
circles, which the pre-historic antiquaries
ascribe to the Britons of the ante-Roman
])eriod, and of which a good example is seen
in the hands of one of the soldiers holding
the leaf-shaped swords, in our cut No. 4 ;
and in^some examples the concentric circles
are more numerous, and resemble still more
closely those found in l^ritain. /• But there
is another object on which the light thrown
by these coins is still more remarkable. A
curious broad-bladed dagger, of bronze, is
not unfrequently fount! in early barrows in ^"^^ ^- ^^"ze Dagger.
this country, the blade ribbed, and evidently belonging to the
same period as the bronze swords. I give, from Sir John
Lubbock, an example found in Ireland (cut No. G), which will
* It is here engraved from a coin in the Briti.sh INIuscuin.
t Juhus Cfiisar made his first cauipaign under Marcus Minucius Ther-
nm.s, and fought with distinction at the taking of Mytelene, on which
occasion he saved the life of a Roman citizen, and received from Therm us
a civic crown as his reward. It is understood that this act of Cy^sar is
commemorated in this coin of Quintus Thermus, the sou of Marcus.
^
THE BRITONS. Fchap. t.
afford a general idea of the form of tliese dagg-ers, \vhicli used
to be called British. I was always inclined to ascribe them to
rather an early date ; that is, to a period very little before
Cajsar's time, or at least early under the Eoman domina-
tion, not because I thought they could not be Roman,
but because, as the Eomans did not bury their arms with
the dead,^ it seemed reasonable enougli to suppose that
barrows in which they are found are older than the final
and entire establishment of Roman customs and laws. ]^ut
the Roman consular coins, on which daggers identical
in character, broad-bladed and ribbed, and with the same
handles, occur - frequently. I give in cut No. 7, a very
curious example.''^ It is a coin of Junius Brutus, who slew
Julius Caesar. On the obverse we have the name l . plaet .
CEST ; i.e., Lucius Plse-
torius Cestianus, one of
the officers of Brutus, by
whose order the coin was
struck, and who gives to
his chief the title brvt .
IMP; 2.^., Brutus iinpera-
No. 7. Coin of Brutus. ^^r. On tlic rcvcrsc, we
see the terrible emblems, the plleus or cap of liberty in the
middle, two daggers, and the word eid . mak', Ekhis (the
archaic form of Idus) MartlcB, the day on which the deed was
done. We see at a glance that the dagger with which Caesar
was slain was identical in every particular with those found in
the tumuli of Britain which- some antiquaries are now ascribing
to the remote age of Phoenician colonies 1
Thus we see that the bronze swords, the bronze sliields, the
bronze spears, the bronze daggers, which liave been found in
Britain, are all Roman in character. The so-called 'celts,'
chisels, etc., bear the same character with the weapons, and are
sometimes found with them, and probably continued in use
later. It is my firm conviction that not a bit of bronze which
has been found in the British islands belongs to an older date
than that at which Caesar wrote that the Britons obtained their
bronze from abroad, meaning, of course, from Gaul, (Bre ntuntur
importato. In fact, these objects in bronze were Roman in cha-
racter, and in their primary origin.
And who has ever brought forward any evidence to show
that the Romans did not use bronze for their weapons? Pliny
* Enffravod from one in tho British Museum.
CHAP. I.] SWORDS AMONG THE GAULS AND ROMAXS. 17
tells us that, in the treaty which concluded the war between
Porsena and the Romans after the expulsion of the Tarquins,
that is, about five hundred years before Christ, it was expressly
stipulated that the Romans thenceforth should use iron for no-
thing but ao-ricultural purposes.* Our acquaintance with the
condition of that time is not sufficiently minute to enable us to
judge Avhat was the cause or the object of this stipulation, but i.|.
seems clear that swords were not made of iron, and they must
therefore have be^n made of bronze. This stipulation coiivtinued
in force during some three centuries, and it was only after the
second Punic war, we are told, that the Romans began to adopt
the form and material of the sword as it was in use among the
Spaniards. Polybius tells a curious anecdote relating to the
gi'eat victory obtained by the Romans over the Gauls during the
consulate of Cains Flaminius, a little more than two hundred
years before Christ. He informs us that the Gauls were armed
with long pointless swords, which they used only in striking the
enemy, while the Romans used short, stiff", pointed swords, with
wliich they stabbed at the face and person. When the Gauls
struck hard, the blade of the sword became so much bent that
the soldier had to straighten it with his foot before he could .
strike another blow. The Roman officers, having observed this,
directed the soldiers to close upon the ranks of the Gauls, and
thrust vigorously at their bodies and faces, before the latter had
time to recover the use of their swords, and by this manoeuvre
the great inequality of numbers was partly compensated.! We
cannot doubt, from this description, that the swords of the Gauls
were made of iron, and that their liability to bend arose from
the circumstance that that people did not yet possess the art of
tempering it; Avhile the account of the Roman swords answers
exactly to the short pointed bronze weapons of which we are
speaking. We have a rather similar anecdote, of a later date,
which brings us nearer home. Tacitus tells us that, in the great
battle in which Agricola defeated the Caledonians under Gal-,
gacus, the Britons were armed with immense swords, that is, of
course, long ones, and small bucklers ; while the Roman auxili-
aries, consisting of three cohorts of Batavi and tw'o of Tungri.
who were chiefly put forward in the engagement, were armed
with short pointed swords {mncrone>i). The result was the same
* In fcjedere quod expulsis regibus populo Romano dedit Porsena noiiii-
iiatim comprehensum inveninms, ne ferro nisi in agricultura uterentur. —
riiny, ' Hist. Nat.,' lib. xxxiv. c. 39.
+ Polybii Histor., lib. ii. c. 33.
C
18 , THE BRITOX?. [chap, i,
;is that just described : the Roman auxiliaries closed upon the
Caledonii, who, unprepared for this to them new mode of fight -
, ing-, were defeated witii great slaughter.* These anecdotes point
very distinctly to the bronze swords of which we are speaking.
We Site thus tracing the use of bronze swords very near to the
time, or ..quite to the time, when the leaf-shape and otlier forms
nfe seen on the consular coins, so that we are quite justified in
supposing that those represented swords of bronze. 1 know
nothing' in the Latin classical writers contradictory to this view
~ni' the subject. Even Yirgil, the fashionable court poet, and the
least likely of any to give evidence on my side of the question,
was certainly well aware of the use of bronze in the manufacture
of arms. Tiie armour was of bronze — that of Mazentius was
triple in thickness ('are cavum trijylici,' jEj/., x. 784), like the
triple bronze which surrounded the breast of the brave man in
Horace (' ^s triplex circa pectus erat,^ Carm., lib, i. od. 3) ; the
' helmet was of bronze C" 6ere cap^it ftdgens^ jEil, x. 869); the
shield was of bronze {' arei clypei^ j^ri., xii. 541, and ' cei^ea
scuta,' j3^n., x. 313); the battle-axe was of bronze {' et (srotam.
quatiens Tarpeia securim,' jEh., xi. 656). In one instance, Virgil
speaks even of bronze swords, —
' iErataeque micant peltee, micat aereus ensis.' — JEn.^ \\\. 743.
It is true, that these bronze swords are put into the hands of a
people foreign to Italy, but it is not stated that they were pecu-
liar to that people. Virgil, further, uses the word as for arms
generally. ^Eneas, describing his flight from Ti'oy, with his
father on his shoulder, says, —
' Genitorque per umbram
Pro-spiciens, "Nate," exclamat, " f uge, nate ; propinquant, —
Ardentes clypeos atque oera micantia cei'no." ' — ^n.^ ii. 734.
More than once Virgil uses the word ceratus as a general epithet
for troops (seeJSn., vii. 703, and ix. 463) ; in the latter passage,
the 'bronze-armed battalions' are described as marching into
battle, —
' Turnu.s in anna viros, anni.s circunidatus ipse,
Suscitat, ajiatasque acies in prailia cogit
Quisque suas.'
Eor the spear, we might quote Ovid's hasta ceraicB ctispidis
(Metam., v. 9), or the line of Tibullus (lib. i. eleg. xi. 1. 25), —
' At novis serata, Lares, depellite tela.'
In fact, when the Roman thought of arms and accoutrements of
* Taciti Agricola, c. 35.
CHAP. I.] BRONZE WEAPONS. 19
war, cES, or bronze, appears to have been the metal^ which' came
vippermost to his mind.
I confess that I see little weight in the argument which has
been drawn from the secondary use of the word/t'/Twrn as syno-
nymous with (jladlus or ensis, a sword. It can only prove that
tliere were swords made of iron among the Romans at the time '
when tlie word was thus used ; probably the swoixl of iron was
then considered the more fashionable — the moie aristocratic. 'At
all events, it woidd be becoming more distinctive. Iron was then
the newest, and probably the most esteemed, material. We must
not forget that, as we have just seen, on one hand the word a-'i
was used for arms in general, not for a particular arnftr'and
therefore, when iron was employed for swords, it would be more
distinctive of the particular weapon ; and that, on the other >
hand, from the time when money had begun to be coined among
the Romans, 6es, as the material of which it was made, was ustd
in a secondary sense to signify money.
When Sir John Lubbock (p. 35) says that I ' lay much stress
on the fact that the bronze weapons have generally been found
near Roman stations and Roman roads,' he has applied to the /
weapons what I had said of a rather different object. During
ages Avhen travelling was neither quick nor safe, and people
seldom took long journeys unnecessarily, they had to depend
for many even of the necessaries of life upon men who carried ^
them round for sale periodically, and a multitude of people gained
their living as itinerant traders and manufacturers. It was a
practice general throughout the middle ages, no doubt derived
from the Romans, and the very utility of such -dealers formed
their protection against injury and interruption. We find abund-
ant traces of this practice, curiously enough, in relation to the
bronze swords and hatchets. These consist in discoveries of
deposits, usually of an earthen vessel for uielting bronze, of
which there is sometimes a residuum at the bottom, of moulds
for casting the implements, and generally of some broken swords
or other bronze implements, no doubt intended to be melted
down for metal, and of similar articles entire, constituting stock
in trade. Now my remark was, that these tools and stock of
itinerant bronze manufacturers are almost always found near a
Roman road, or in the neighbourhood of a Roman station, and
that therefore we are justified in considering them as Roman
subjects, who had travell6d along the Roman roads, and rested
at those spots for personal or local reasons which are unknown
to us. Discoveries of sucl/cleposits have been very numerous in
2C THE BRITOX>?. [chap, l
Britain, Gaul, Swilzerlcind, and Germany. 1 am not nware if
they have been found on the other confines of the empire. One
of these, consisting- of a quantity of bronze celts, both entire and
broken, was found near the foot of the Wrekin in Shropshire,
not far from the gTeat Roman road, the Watlingstreet ; another,
anionu; which there were fragments of a bronze sword, at Sit-
tingbonrne, on the Kentish portion of the Watlingstreet ; a third,
consisting- of bronze punches, chisels, and other implements, witli
several pieces of unused metal, one of which was evidently tlu;
residuum of the melting-pot, at Attleborough in Norfolk, on tiie
Roman road between Thetford and Norwich ; a fourth, consist-
ing of sixty bronze chisels, etc., with a portion of a bronze sword
and a piece of bronze wliich again appeared to be the residue
from melting, all contained in an eartlien pot, at Weston in
Yorkshire, on the road from Old Malton (where tliere are the
remains of a Roman town) to York. It is not necessary to
enumerate any further examples. Sir John Lubbock seeks to
explain tlie position of these iinds by supposing that tiie Roman
roads were laid upon older British roads, but this is an objection
to which I cannot listen until he brings me the slightest sub-
stantial evidence tliat sucli was the case. To me, these ' finds '
I alone are sufficient to explain a fact which Sir John hardly, or
only feebly, denies, the identity of forms, and not mere similarity,
of all these bronze swords, in whatever part of Europe they ai*e
found. I cannot imagine that any one will believe tliat tliis
identity of form is the result of chance, but they must have been
derived from one general centre; and, when we consider the
radius through which they are scattered, it was only the Roman
empire that could have snpplied such a centi'e. it is nonsense
to suppose that, brought into Britain at a remote and obscure
period by the Phoenicians, they could have spread in this manner.
The whole mystery, then, is dispelled by the proceedings of these
itinerant manufacturers, who must have been very inunerous,
and who went not only to the limits of the Roman province, but,
no doubt, penetrated into the surrounding countries, and made
weapons for their inhabitants. It was, for these, the easiest way
of obtaining weapons. Swords were so rare, and so valued,
among the Scandinavians and Teutons, that they believed them
to have been forged by the gods ; and I beg to state that the
arms which the gods forged were made of iron.* There are
* It may be remarked, on this subject, that even in the early Anglo-
SMxon cemeteries in this island, which belong- to the period immediately
following the Komans, only one warrior here and there is found with u
(HAP. I.] THE EARLY IRTSII. 21
many reasons, into wliicli I will not now enter, for believin<i-
tliat it was a subject of honour and o-lory, amono- the different
branches of the Teutonic race, for a man to possess a sword ;
and here the 'barbarian' had a chance of gettino- a sword to
wear by his side at not so great an expense of wealth and trouble
as if it had been made by the gods, and he no doubt proKted
largely by it. And then, the ' barbarians,' contrary to the
Uoman practice, buried their weapons with the dead, in cons(;-
(luence of which we find in their graves a sufficiency of those
weapons to till our museums, wdiile we only pick up one now
and then within the bounds of the Roman empire. Such is tlie
case with Ireland, where, by the way, it has been somewhat
too hastily asserted that the Roman arms never penetrated, ^->
^ seeing that we know little of the /iisto?y of our islands under the (Jy
Romans, — that Juvenal, speaking as of a fact generally known,
asserts, —
' Anna quidem ultra
Litora Juvernai promo vim us,' —
and that Roman antiquities are now found in Ireland. Such is
the case with Scandinavia, and also of the other countries of
Europe bordering upon the Roman provinces. It has been
alleged that some of the ornamentation of the Scandinavian
bronze-work is not Roman in its character, which is true — but
why ? It is not probable that an enterprising people like the
Scandinavians Avould be satisfied to remain long dependent on
the precarious supplies, as they must have been at such a dis-
tance, of wandering merchants, and they would soon learn to
imitate what they had seen done by others. Roman ornament-
ation and design, in their hands, wouhi soon undergo degrad-
ation until it took a character of its own, just as it did among
the Anglo-Saxons, and among the Germans, and indeed among
all the other non-Roman peoples into whose hands it fell. I
have always held the belief that the mass of the Scandinavian
ornamented bronze is nothing more than the development of
Rword, while most of them were buried with spears. This would show
that the sword was comparatively rare among the Anglo-Saxons, that only
one individual here and there possessed one, or that they were considered j'
too precious to be buried. Yet the common poetical phrase for being killed i
in battle was siveordum aswefede^ ' put to sleep with swords.' In fact, the /
naine of the more valuable of the weapons was employed to represent them I
all, just as among the Romans the name of the more valued metal for '
making a sword, ferrum, was used to signify all swords, and then used for
weapons in general, because the sword was considered the most excellenr.
We still talk of putting the enemy ' to the sword,' omitting altogether the
mention of muskets, rifles, lances, revolvers, etc., etc.
Lb THE BUnOXS. LCHAr. I.
Koman popular art under the influence of barbaric taste ; and I
think this will hardly be denied by any one who is familiarly
acquainted with the forms and spirit of Roman art.
But it is time to conclude these remarks. I will only repeat
the belief, on which I have always insisted, that in this part of
the world the use of bronze did not precede that of ii'on, and I
believe that I am fully supported in this view by the opinion of
our <!;reat metallurgist, my friend Dr Percy. At the time of
Caesar's invasion, as that g-reat warrior and statesman declares
deliberately, the only bronze known to the Britons was im-
ported ; of course from Gaul, and it could not have come in
large quantities. The Britons could not have made bronze
themselves, for I am satisfied, by my own researches among
our ancient mines, that no copper was obtained in this island
\ until it was found by the Eomaiis. I am informed that, instead
] of being easy, the process of mining copper and tin, and pre-
j paring bronze, is very complicated and difficult; whereas the
smelting of iron is extremely easy, and in some parts of our
island, as in the forest of Dean, the iron ore presented itself on
the surface, and in a form which could not fail to di-aw the
attention of men who knew anything about metals. I confess
that I only look upon the modern myth of the colonisation of
this island by the Phoenicians as unworthy the consideration of
a serious antiquary. It is based upon speculations which have
no historical foundation. In these new questions which are
agitated by men of science, we nuist enter upon the study of
the remote period of archaeology of which we have no practical
knowledge, with a very profound knowledge of the subsequent
historic period; wdiereas this new school of antiquaries prefer
contemplating altogether the doubtful period speculatively from
the utterly unknown period which preceded it, to going back to
/it from the known period which followed. Indeed, I fear that
(far too much of prehistoric archaeology, as it has been hitherto
presented to us, rests only upon a want of knowledge of what is
historic.
c:iAP. II.] ETHNOLOGICAL VIEWS. 2?
CMAPTEH II.
Lthuological Views — Political Movements in Gaul — Cajsar's fir^^t and
second Invasions — Cassivellaunus — The Britons, as described by
Ca^isar, Strabo, and Diodorus^ — Cunobeline and his Sons — Expedition
of Claudius — Conquests of the earlier Propreetors — Caractacus— -Car-
tisniandua and Venusius — Invasion of Mona — ^Insurrection of Boadi-
cea — War with the Brigantes — Campaigns of Agricola — Total Sub-
jection of the Island to Rome — Enumeration of the British Tribes —
Hibernia — Manners of the Britons, as described by ancient writers —
The Druids.
According to the system now generally adopted by ethnolo-
gists, Europe was peopled by several successive migrations, or,
as they have been technically named, waves of population, all
liowiiig from one point in the east. Of these the two principal
were the Celts and the Teutons or Germans, both branches of
tlie same great race, which has been popularly termed the
Japhetaii, l)ecause, according to the Scriptural account, the
various peoples which belonged to it were all descended from
Japhet. The Celts came first in point of time, and, making
tlieir way apparently through the districts bordering on the
Mediterranean, they spread over all Western Europe. The
German nations, entering Europe from the shores of the Black
Sea, advanced through its central parts, till, coming in contact
with the Celts, they gradually drove them forwards to the west
and south-west. The Germans themselves were urged west-
n^ard by a new migration which was pressing upon them from
behind, that of the Sclavonic or Sarmatian race, which, as early \
as the tinu! of the Greek historian Herodotus, that is, in tlie I
middle of the fifth century before Christ, had already established /
itself on the eastern borders of Europe.
Of the successive movements of these nations, and the
mutual struggles which ended in their location in the positions
they occupied when we tirst became acquainted with them,
history has preserved no record. The early Greek writers knew
little cf Western Europe, and Herodotus co\ild only inform us
V
24 THE BRITOXS. - [chap. ii.
that the western extremity was occupied by a people wliom lie
terms the Cynetae, and that all the countries next to them Avere
said to be inhabited by the Celtse or Celts ; and he had an
indistinct notion of the British Isles, under the general term of
Cassiterides, or the tin islands, as the g-i-and source from which
the Phoenicians derived their supply of that metal. The philo-
sop>|ier Aristotle, who lived a hundred years later, or about three
centuries and a half before Christ, speaks more definitely and dis-
tinctly of the ocean without the Pillars of Hercules (the Straits
of Gibraltar), in which he tells us there were ' two islands,
\ which are very large, Albion and lerne, called the Britannic,
I which lie beyond the Celta?.' This is the earliest mention of
I our islands by their names. Another Greek historian, Polybius,
who w^rote very little more than a hundred and tifty years
before the Christian era, adds nothing to our knowledge on this
subject, but he speaks of the method in which the tin was ob-
tained and prepared in the ' Britannic Isles,' as of a matter with
which he was well acquainted, and which was then a subject of
so .much interest that he wrote a separate treatise upon it, now
unfortunately lost. All that we learn from these ^e\\ and
scanty notices is, that from a very early period of the history of
the world, the merchants of Phamicia obtained tluir supply of
tin (an article in use bs far back as the time of Homer) from
Britain. As this metal is found chiefly in Cornwall and the
tScilly Islands, the parts of Britain which would first present
themselves to navigators from the Phoenician port on the coast
of Spain, Gadeira or Gades (the modern Cadiz), we are justified
in believing tliat these and the south of Ireland were the only
districts visited by that people, who, as we are further assured,
kept their knowledge a profound secret, in order that they
might with greater ease monopolise a lucrative brancli of
commerce. The geographer Strabo tells us that the Eomans
long attempted in vain to discover the place from Avhence the
Phoenicians obtained their tin, to which at this time were added
lead and perhaps copper, and that on one occasion a Phoenician
captain, perceiving that he was followed and watched by Roman
vessels, ran his own ship intentionally on the roci<s rather than
let the secret b(; discovered, aud, escaping with his crew on a
raft, was rewarded by his own government for his patriotism.
A It was not till a Roman named Publius Crassus, who is sup-
j)osed to be the commander sent by Caesar at the end of his
first campaign in Gaul to reduce the Gallic tribes on the sl)or<s
of the British Channel, discovered the trade of the Pha^nicians
CHAP. II.] EARLY MOVEMENT OF THE CELTIC RACE. "io
with Britain, that the Komans became acquainted with the
ronte by which their mercliants reached Britain by sea, and
with the ease with whicli the tin was dug- up, it being- then
found at a very small depth under the surface of the ground. -
Previous to this, however, two other commercial states had
established an intercourse with the tin district bf Britain. The
Carthaginian Himilco, sent by his government on a voyage of
discovery between the years 362 and 350 before the Christian
era, visited the tin islands, which he calls (Estrymnides, near
Albion, and two days' sail from lerne, by which lie is supposed
to mean some of the isles on the Cornish coast ; and the
Phocean colonies of Massilia and Narbona carried on the same
commerce overland. We are informed by another Greel:
^ writer, Diodorus Siculus, that the tin was conveyed i'vbm the
district in wliich it was found to an island ' in front of Britaift,'
named Ictis, apparently the Isle of Wight, wliere it was pur-
chased by native merchants, who transported it to Gaul, and it
was then cai'ried overland on pack-horses a journey of thirty
days to the mouth of the Khone. Everything, however,
relating to this distant region, almost unconnected Avitli the
world as then known, was wrapped in mystery ; and Scipio
could obtain no satisfactory answer to the anxious inquiries
concerning Britain which he made among the merchants of the
great cities of Massilia, Narbona, and Corbelo. The veil was at
length drawn aside by the ambition of Julius Caesar.
At this time the movement of the German race towards the
west was proceedingly rapidly, and the Celtic populations of
(laul and Britain Avould probably have been soon crushed
beneath the invasion, had not the Romans stepped fn to arrest
its progress. Perhaps the northern parts of Gaul were already
extensively peopled by tribes of German extraction, and there
are reasons for believing that the Belgse were themselves a
Teutonic race,* a circumstance whicli would explain some diffi-
culties in the history of Western Europe at this period.
The mass of the Celtic population, as we learn from Csesar,
were serfs, without civil influence or even civil rights ; the mere
* Cassar tells us distinctly, that the Belga^ differed in lan^^uage, customs,
and laws, from the Celtae, equally with the Aquitani : ' Gallia est onmis
divisa in partes tres ; quaruih unam incolunt Belgae, aliam Aquitani, ter-
tiam qui ipsorum lingua Coltai, nostra Galli, adpellantur. Hi onmes lingua,
institutis, legibus inter se differunt.' This statement, combined witji
various circumstances of their history, lead me to believe that the Belgjc
wore of German origin ; and I confess that the arguments of Dr Priphard
aud others, to the contrary, seem to me unsatisfactory.
26 THE BRITONS. [chap. ri.
slaves of the superior orders. Tlie latter were divided into two
very distinct classes — the Druids and the kniglits {mllites) ; or
in other words, the priests and the chiefs of chins or military
leaders. The former, who resembled the Brahniinical class in
India, combined with the sacerdotal profession the functions of
judg-es and legislators, and during' the course of ages they seem
gradually to have usurped the supreme powers in the state, and
to have reduced the military chiefs to a state of political sub-
jection. These, however, had not entirely forgotten their
ancient independence, and the spirit of resistance appears to
have been stirred up and encouraged by the example of the
i Teutonic tribes who were now mixing with them, and who were
far less priest-ridden, for Caesar tells us that they had no Druids.
' The whole of Gaul became thus divided into two great political
factions, some of the tribes uniting in support of the Druidic
iiitiuence, while others took part with the military chiefs. The
western Celtse — among whom were the Carnutes, in whose terri-
tory (the modern Chartres) stood the sacred grove, the head seat
of Druidic worship in Gaul, with the people of Brittany, of whose
devotion to the religion of their race so many rude monmnents
still remain — all supported the Druidic faction, of which the
Hedui, who inhabited the modern Burgundy, took the lead.
The Belgse, as might be expected, with the northern tribes, sup-
ported the other faction, at the head of which were the Sequani,
whose capital was Vesontio (the modern Besan9on). Hard
pressed by the Druid faction, the tribes who supported the
military chiefs had called to their assistance the Germans
under Ariovistus, while, to resist these terrible invaders, the
Hedui appealed for protection to Rome. To Caesar this was a
welcome proposal ; he came with his legions, drove the Germans
back over the Rhine, and then taking advantage of the political
divisions among the nations of Gaul, proceeded to reduce it to
a Roman province. The Gauls, too late, threw aside their
mutual animosities in order to resist their common enemy, and
when Caesar thought that they were cut off from all foreign aid
by the ocean behind them, he found that they Avere drawing
])owerful reinforcements from Britain. The Belgye, who sur-
passed all the other nations of Gaul in valour and conduct,
— JL. wer(! the last to yield to the military genius of the Roman
' commander, and to the steady discipline of liis cohorts. \\ hen
lie at length reached their coast, and saw from the lieights
between Boulogne and Calais the white cliffs of Albion, he
resolved to carry his arms into the island which had so long
V
CHAP. II] THE CELTIC RACE IN BiaTAIX. 27
l)een an object of curiosity to his countrvmen, and ascertain tlie
resources which might be used to assist those wlioni he liad
made their foes.
]5ritain contained at tin's time nearly the same political ele-
ments as Gaul. The basis of its population was the same
Celtic race which there held with the Druidic faction ; and the
supremacy of the Druids or priestly order seems to l.Mve been
established more firmly in Britain even than in Gaul. We are
not able to say with any certainty if any, or how much, of the
population of the western parts of our island derived its origin
from the Aquitanian or Basque race, but we know that the
BelgiB had taken possession of the richest parts of South Britain,
and that these settlers wei'e in close alliance with their brethren
on the other side of the Straits, while the Celtic Yeneti of Gaul,
a seafaring tribe, maintained their old commercial intercourse
with the Celts of Britain. We are ignorant of the extent to
wdiich the division between the Druids and the military chiefs
had been introduced into this island, but Ave know that the
British tribes in the time of Caesar were no strangers to civil
strife.
As the season Avas far advanced, the Roman commander saw-
that no time was to be lost, and he called together the mei'-
cliants irom diiferent parts of the coast, in the hopes of obtain-
ing from them the necessary information relating to the country
which he Avas about to invade. But they seemed to have con-
spired together to deceive him, and Avhen he questioned them,
they could tell him neither the extent of the island, nor the
number or character of the natiA^es who inhabited it, nor even
the harbours in Avliich a fleet might anchor. Nevertheless,
they sent intelligence to the Britons of the designs of invasion
and conquest Avhich Csesar had not concealed. Several of the
British states, thus Avarned, despatched messengers to Caesar,
offering to submit to the government of the Eoman people and
to give hostages for their fidelity. These he sent back Avith
liberal promises, and they were accompanied by Commius,
whom the Jioman commander had made king over the A^an-
([uished Attrebates of Gaul, and who Avas directed to visit as
many of the states as he could, and to exhort them to submit to
the Romans. The real object of the British envoys Avas perhaps
to gain information, as Caesar Avas still as ignorant as ever of
the country and its coasts. He, therefore, sent one of his
officers, Cains Volusenus, Avith a war-galley, to survey tlie
l^ritish coasts, while he assembled his troops in the country of
V
{
28 THE BRITONS. [chap. ii.
the Morini (the Pas-de-Calais), and ordered the ships which
had been employed in the precedin"- year against the Veneti to
repair to the Portus Iccius, a naval station afterwards called
Gessoriacnm (Boulogne).
Satisfied with the imperfect survey of Yoluseniis, Caesar em-
barked at the Portns Iccius before daybreak in an autumn
morning, carrying with him, in about eighty vessels of burden,
his favourite legion, the tenth, in the courage and devotion of
which he placed the utmost confidence, and the seventh. His
cavalry was directed to follow in eighteen vessels which Avere
stationed in a port about eight miles from that in which Caesar
end)arked. About ten o'clock in the forenoon the Roman fleet
arrived on the coast of Ih'itain, here formed of low cliffs, which
were covered with British warriors prepared for battle. After
w^aiting in vain for the arrival of his cavalry until three o'clock
in the afternoon, Caesar took advantage of a favom-able wind
and tide, and naming on about seven miles further, brought his
ships up on an open and level strand, which was more favour-
able for the landing of his troops. The latter were seized wdth
alarm at the novel and formidable appearance of the multitude
of warriors who had huriied forwards to meet them, and were
now drawn up in hostile array on the shore, and, nnacquainted
with the depth of the water, they w^ere unwilling to leave their
siiips. At length, after much hesitation, the standard-bearer of
the tenth legion, calling on his fellow-soldiers to follow, jumped
into the sea. It Avas some time before the Eoman soldiers could
reach firm ground ; for the depth of their ships had obliged
them to anchor at a considerable distance from the shore, and
they had to struggle through deep water, in which they were
impeded by the weight of their arms and accontrements ; while
their enemies, lighter and more agile, rode into the water with
their horses, and attacked them, as they attempted to form, in
small parties, or overwhelmed them with a shower of missiles
from the beach. As soon, however, jis the soldiers obtained a
firm footing, the Britons who had sh(, »vn no want of courage in
the previous confused engagement, yielded to superior discipline,
and fled, making their escape with the less loss because the in-
vaders wei'e destitute of cavalry.
Thus did the Romans, for the first time, place their feet on
that distant island whose name had hitherto belonged rather to
the poet than to the historian. It is not easy to explain the
subsequent conduct of the Britons, except by the entire want
of union amony: the various tribes which were scattered over
CHAP. II.] ARRIVAL OF THE ROMANS IN BRITAIN. 29
the island. Their chiefs, instead of making any furtlier attempt
to retrieve their first defeat, or appealing to the other tribes to
join them in resisting tlie invaders, sent messengers to Caesar
with excnses for the resistance they had already made, promis-
ing obedience in futnre, and offering hostages. Commius, the
chief of the Attrebates, came with these messengers ; he liad
been seized on his arrival in Britain, and thrown into chains ;
but the chiefs now gave him his liberty, throwing the blame of,
his detention on the multitude, and promising to make amends
for their imprudent hostility. Caesar readily granted them
])eace, demanding a certain number of hostages, part of whom
were immediately delivered ; and the chiefs dismissed their fol-
lowers, and repaired, in considerable numbers, to Caesar's camp.
The insincerity of their submission was, however, soon proved.
Caesar had been four days in Britain before his cavalry could
put to sea from the coast of Gaul, and then, although a favour-
able wind brought them within sight of the camp, the weather
became so stormy that they were driven back to the ports they
had left. The storm increased during the night, dragged the
transports from their ancliors, and drove the whole fleet on the
sliore, where most of the Roman ships were destroyed, or more
or less damaged. This accident, and the dismay into which it
threw Caesar's army, encouraged the British chiefs to form a
new confederacy, with the design of attacking the camp, from
which, under various pretences, they gradually withdrew. Tlie
Romans busied themselves with refitting their fleet, and were
not aware of the designs of the Britons, till one day tlie seventh
legion went out, as usual, to forage, and they had not been long
absent, when the guards at the gate of the camp reported that
there Avas an unusual cloud of dust in the direction which they
had taken. Caesar, hurrying with other troops to the assistance
of his foragers, found that the latter were surrounded by a mul-
titude of armed Britons, who had rushed upon them from the
woods, and that they were defending themselves with difficidty
against the attacks of the horsemen and charioteers. The
assailants were now repulsed ; but Caesar found it necessary to
draw off his men, and make good his retreat to the camp, where
the Britons, who considered this engagement as a victory, deter-
mined to attack him; and they sent messengers in all directions
to call the neighbouring chiefs to their standard. A continu-
ance of stormy weather prevented the attack for several days
during which Caesar, Avarned of their design, made every pre-
paration for defence, the result of which was a new and severe
30 THE BKITONS. [chap. ji.
defeat of tlie Britons, wlio were pursued with slau<;liter by a
small body of cavalry which attended upon the Attrebatiaii
Commius. The same day, the chiefs sent again to demand
peace, which Caesar, anxious to return to Gaid before the set-
tiiig-in of the equinoctial gales, granted, after exacting double
the number of hostages which he had previously required. He
then embarked his troops, and reached the country of the Morini
in safety, from whence the intelligence sent him by his friends
recalled him to Italy. But, before his departui-e, he gave direc-
tions for fitting out a great number of ships, of a shape better
adapted for landing his troops on the shores of Britain, announc-
ing that it vvas his intention to return to the island in the en-
suing spring.
The officers and troops left in Gaul showed their zeal in the
completeness with which they executed the orders of their great
commander; and when Ctesar returned to them, in the year 64
B.C., he found everything ready for the transport of his troops,
his horses, and his provisions. The former consisted of five
legions, with two thousand cavalry. These were embarked in
upwards of eight hundred ships, and the appearance of this
numerous fleet so alarmed the Britons, that tlicy deserted the
coast, and retired to the less accessible parts of the country.
The Eomans, on this occasion, landed in or near the same spot
as in the year preceding ; and Csesar chose a place for his camp
on the shore. Some priso-ners, taken in the course of the same
afternoon, having given information of the spot where the Britons
were assembled, he marched against them at night, leaving ten
cohorts and three hundred horse to guard the ships. He found
the Britons posted in a woody district, about twelve Koman
(perhaps sixteen English) miles from his camp, on the banks
of a river supposed to be the Stour ; and as he approached (I
now use his own words), they ' came down to the river to meet
him, with their horsemen and chariots, and attempted, from
elevated ground, to begin the battle, and repel our troops. But
our horse soon drove them back, and they took refuge in the
woods, where they had a place singularly strong both by nature
and art, and which, to all appearances, had been constructed by
them as a stronghold during their civil wars ; for every approach
to it was efiectually blocked up with felled trees. Some few of
their troops, however, continued to skirmish from the woods,
and prevented our men from entering their fortress. But the
soldiers of the seventh legion lockecl their shields together, so
as to form what is called the ttdudo, and, mounting over a
CHAP. II.] CASSIVELLAUiXUS. 31
iriound thrown up against the defences, took the place, and ex-
pelled the Britons from the woods, without experiencing much
loss tliemselves.'
CiEsar was prevented from following- up this success by the
intelligence of another disaster which had befallen his fleet,
tiirough a violeut storm on the second night after his arrival.
He returned in haste to his camp, found that the damage doue
to his fleet had not been exaggerated by the messengers who
brought him intelligence of it, and gave immediate directions
for repairing the shattered ships. ' He now resolved, not-
withstanding the difficidty of the task, to haul up all his ships,
and inclose them in one line of fortification with the camp.
This labour occupied about ten days ; and the work was not
intermitted during the night. The vessels were thus drawn ;
up, and a camp strongly fortified ; after which, leaving the |
same force to guard the fleet, he recommenced his march in /
the same direction as before.' Caesar found that the
Britons had employed the time which he had lost by the
disaster of his fleet, in composing their differences and uniting
against him ; for when he landed in Britain, the different
tribes were engaged in mutual hostilities : perhaps it was a
struggle between the Belgian settler and the aboriginal Celt: *
and the chief of the latter is named l)y Caesar, Cassivellaunus
or Cassibellaunus. This chief, who seems to have been of the
British race, and whose territoiy is supposed to have been the
present county of Hertford, had been gradually reducing under
his sway the tribes around him. We learn, incidentally, that
some of the chiefs, whose rights he had usurped, had fled to
Gaul, and there made their complaint to Caesar, and implored
his protection. This was the case with Mandubratius, the
young chief of the Trinobantes, a people occupying the modern
county of Essex, and considered, at the time of Caesar's inva-
sion, as the principal tribe of this part of the island. The
kingdom of the Trinobantes had been seized by Cassivellaunus,
who murdered its king, Imanuentius, the father of Mandu-
bratius, and the latter only escaped a similar fate by flight.
The different tribes of the south-eastern parts of the island,
as we have just said, now joined in a temporary league against
the invaders : and it is a proof of the general estimation of
the talents of Cassivellaunus, that they agreed in selecting him
* It may perhaps be considered, in favour of this supposition, that the
chiefs who were oppressed by Cassivellaunus fled to the continent to seek
assistance, instead of applying to the native tribes of the interior.
32 . THE BRITONS. [chap. ii.
for their leader. In consequence of this confederacy, when
Csesar marched back to the position from Avhicli he had been
called by the disaster of his fleet, he found the enemy collected
in much greater numbers than before, to oppose his further
progress. The Roman legions and their auxiliaries were now-
exposed to constant attacks, in the course of which they lost
many men ; for the woods, which appear to have covered or
skirted the country through which Caesar marched, gave a
secure shelter to the Britons, and they were thus enabled to
harass the Romans by sudden and unexpected attacks, and,
when repulsed, to retreat without loss, as the heavy-armed
legionaries would seldom overtake them in their flight. ' In
all these skirmishes,' Caesar tells us, ' so immediately under
our eyes, and close to the camp, it was evident that the weight
of our men's arNinovlr prevented them from pursuing the enemy
when they retreated, or advancing far from their own colours.
In short, their accoutremeirts were ill-adapted for contending
with such an- enemy as they had now to deal with ; and the
cavalry, in particular, were much exposed on the held of battle ;
'for the Britons would often make a feigned retreat, and allure
them to separate from the legions, after which they would leap
from their chariots, and take the cavalry at a disadvantage. . . .
Moreover, the Britons never advanced in one body, but fought
in small parties, stationed at intervals, so that one squadron
relieved, another, and our men, who had been contending
against those who were exhausted, suddenly found themselves
engaged with a fresh body, who hjid taken their places. The
next day, the e'nemy posted themselves on the hills, at some
distance from the camp, and only appeared a few at a time ;
and they were also less disposed to attack our cavalry than
they had been the day before. About noon, Csesar sent out
Cains Ti'ebonius, the lieutenant, with three legions and all the
cavalry, to forage ; upon which the enemy assembled from all
sides, and surrounded the foragers, who were unable to leave
their colours, or separate from the legions. Our men now
made a general attack upon them, and put them to flight and
pursued them Avithout interruption, as long as the legions kept
in sight to give the cavalry confidence of support whilst they
drove the Britons before them. In this manner, they did not
allow them time to rally, or halt, or leap from their chariots,
according to their usual custom. In consequence of this defeat,
the British reinforcements, which were arriving from all sides,
again disbanded, and from that time the enemy never again
CHAP. II.] DEFEAT OF CASSIVELLAUNUS. 33
came to a "general engngement. Caesar, now knowing their
intentions, led liis army towards the Thames, in order to invade
tlie territories of CassiveUaunus. The river could only be
passed, on foot, in one place, and that with difficulty. When
lie arrived on its banks, he perceived a large force drawn up
on the other side to oppose him ; the bank, moreover, was
planted with sharp stakes, and others of the same kind were
fixed in the bed of the river beneath the Avater. Caesar gained
intelligence of this from ])risoners and deserters. He accord-
ingly sent the cavalry in advance, and brought up the infantry
nnmediately in the rear. So great were the ardour and
impetuosity of the soldiers, that, whilst their heads alone
appeared above the water, the enemy, unable l/o sustain their
attack, abandoned the bank and fled precipitrftely. Cassivel-
launus, as we have before observed, abandoned all idea of
lighting, and dismissed the greater part of his forces, retaining
only about four thonsand men in chariots. With these he
watched our march, and, retiring out of our way, lay m wait
for us among the woods and difficult passes. Meanwhile, he
cleared the whole country threttgh whicli dur road4ay, both of
men and cattle ; and when our foragers went out to get pro-
visions and waste the country, his knowledge of the ways
enabled him to assail them with all his chariots ; this caused
much danger to our cavalry, and prevented tliem from going-
far from the main body.'
One defeat was sufficient to break th^ ill-consorted alliance
which CassiveUaunus had formed against the Romans ; and the
superiority of the latter once demonstrated, the ditf'erent tribes
Avho had been oppressed by that chieftain seem to have thrown
the blame of their resistance on his intiuence, making a merit
of their personal hostility towards him, and seeking an alliance
with the invaders. First came messengers from the Trino-
bantes of Middlesex and Essex, who ottered to submit to the
Romans on condition that they should espouse the cause of
their young chief Maudnbratius, and restore him to the sove-
reignty of their tribe, which CassiveUaunus had usurped. - The
treaty was soon arranged ; Mandubratius, who happened to be
in Caesar's camp, Avas sent back to rule his tribe as a Roman
tributary ; and the Trinobantes, according to agreement, gave
forty hostages, and supplied the Roman army Avith corn. The-
examples of the Trinobantes was immediately followed by^ the
Cenimagni, the Segontiaci, the Ancalites, the Bibroci, and the
Cassi. The first of these tribes lay to the north of the Trino-
D
34 THE BRITONS. [chap. ir.
bantes, in the present county of Suffolk ; the Segoutiaci occupied
the greater part of the present counties of Hampshire and
Berksliire ; the Bibroci inhabited a thickly-wooded country
contaiuiug the celebrated forest of Anderida- — including a small
part of Hampshire and Berkshire, and stretching through th(^
modern counties of Sussex and Surrey into the eastern parts of
Kent ; the position of the Ancalites is less certain, but they,
perhaps, lay on the north of Berkshire and on the western
borders of Middlesex ; and if the Cassi were the same tribe
that was called by Ptolemy the Catyeuchlani, as is supposed,
they formed the link between these other tribes and the Tiino-
bantes, stretching through the modern counties of Hertford,
Bedford, and Buckingham. The envoys of these tribes iuformed
Caesar, ' that the town of Cassivellaunus was not far off,
surrounded by woods and marshes, and occupied by a large
number of men and cattle. The Britons call by the name of
town a place in the fastnesses of the woods surrounded by a
mound and trench, and calculated to afford them a retreat and
protection from hostile invasion.* Ca3sar immediately marched
to this place, which he found extremely strong, both by nature
and art ; nevertheless, he assailed it at once in two different
quarters. The enemy stood their ground for a time, but at
length gave way before the onset of our men, and abandoned
the town by the opposite side. A great number of cattle were
found there, and many of the enemy were slain or taken
prisoners in the pursuit.'
It will be seen by reference to a map that Caesar had now
received the submission of a verv lar^e tract of countrv,
extending from sea to sea, and completely surrounding the
! country of the Cantii, in which he had first landed. All these
tribes seem to have bargained for protection against Cassivel-
launus, and it is probable that they had been all more or less
brought under his rule. Iliis had been the case also with
Cantium, or Kent, which was then ruled by four kings, or
chiefs, whom Caesar calls Cingetorix, Carvilius, Taximagulus,
and Segonax. When Caesar marched across the Thames,
CassiveHaunus, driven from his own country, seems to have
formed the project of cutting him oti" from the coast, and,
marching into Kent, he sent to the four Kentish chiefs just
mentioned his orders to assemble their forces immediately, and
* Oppidum autem Britanni vocant, quum sylvas impeditas vallo atque
fossa iDunierunt, quo, incursionis liostiuin vitandse causa, convenire cuii-
sueverunt. Eo pi'oficiscitur cum legionibus : locum vppoiit egregia natura
atque opere munitum. — Ctesar, Bell. Gall. lib. v. o. 17.
cuAP. II.] SUBMISSION OF CASSIVELLAUNUS. 35
join liim in surprising the naval camp of the Eomans. This
attack was, like so many others, unsuccessful ; the assailants
were beaten from the camp with considerable slaughter, and a
young chief of consideration, named Lugotorix, was taken
prisoner. This action convinced Cassivellaunus that it was in
vain to contend with his irregular warriors against the disci-
pline of the Roman veterans ; and now, finding that even his
own subjects were disaffected to him and had made their peace
with the invaders, he also, through the intermediation of the
Attrebatian Commius, offered to submit. His proposals were
accepted, for Caesar was now anxious, for various reasons, to
return to Gaul ; and having agreed upon a tribute which the
Britons were to pay annually to the E-oman people, and
given his injunction to Cassivellaunus not to make war upon
Mandubratius or the Trinobantes, who were naturally supposed
to have incurred his hatred by their being the first to submit,
Csesar led his legions back to Gaul, carrying with him hostages |
whicli he had taken from the British chiefs as pledges for their '
fulfilment of the terms of the treaty.
Such is Caesar's account of his exploits in Britain, which
have every appearance of being truthful, although we have no
other authority by which to test them. His descriptions are
much too indefinite to enable us to trace with any certainty the
line of his march, and it is but a waste of time with so few
data to attempt to fix the sites of his camps or battle-fields.
There can be little doubt that the Romans landed somewhere on
the line of coast between Folkestone and Sandwich, but as that
coast is known to have undergone great changes since that
period, it would be unsafe to rely on his description at the
present day.* The river on the banks of which he found the
Britons posted is supposed to have been the Stour. We can
hardly doubt that his subsequent march lay along the edge of
the Weald, perhaps along the vale of Maidstone. The place at
which the Romans crossed the Thames was fixed by a tradition
which existed in the time of Bede, when the stakes, said to have
been those which defended the river, remained,t at a place now
* The theory has recently been sustained with some ingenuity, that the
Romans did not start for this expedition from the country of the Morini,
but from the mouth of the river Somme, and that the Romans landed in
the neighbourhood of Pevensey ; but I do not believe that Caesar's narrative
will bear this interpretation. See my remarks on this subject in the
'Wanderings of an Antiquary,' pp. 102, 103 (London, 18-54).
+ Traditions, even of the time of Bede, are not of much value, unless
well supported by other circumstances. The words of this writer, after
36 THE BRITOX.^
(f-
called Cowev Stnkes, near Cliertsey, in Surrey. Tlie stron
hold of Cassivellaiiiius, which tlie Roman soldiers carried by
storm, lias been conjectured witli much less probability to have
stood on tlie spot afterwards occupied by the Roman city of
Yerulamium (near St Alban's). Other sites have been su"--
ii'ested, but we willingly pass over such vague and useless con-
jectures to confine ourselves as much as possible to known,
or more apparent, facts.
Csesar's expedition to Britain was looked upon as one of the
mOst remarkable events of the time, and from this moment the
distant western island was a common theme for poetry and
"S declamation. The victorious commander was looked upon as
one whq^ had carried the Roman arms into a new world —
penitus toto dlvisos orbe Brltannos — and his countrymen listened
'eagerly to the account brought home by their armies of these
hitherto unknown peoples. Caesar evidently gained the best
information he could on the manners of the Britons, and his
brief description of the island and its inhabitants is apparently
given at least with good faith. He knew that the island was
in its general form triangular, and he was sufficiently well
informed of the comparative proportions of its different sides.
He knew that another island, which he reckoned to be half the
size of Britain, and which he called-ffiberuia (Ireland), lay to
the west of Britain, and he placed between these an isle named
Mqna (Anglesea or Man). He speaks more doubtfully of other
islands,, of smaller dimensions, with a more northerly position.
(The inhabitants of the interior of Britain, according to the
traditionary information gained by Cfiesar, were the original
inhabitants of the island, while the south-eastern coasts Avere
inhabited by Belgic colonies, who, as he informs us, had given
to the different petty states {clvitate^Y^i Britain the name of
giving' the account from Caesar of the fortifying of the river with stakes,
are, ' the remains of which stakes are to be seen there to this day ; and it
appears to the observer as though the several stakes — each about the thick-
ness of man's thigh, and cased with lead — were fixed innnoveably in the
bed of the river,' — {quarum vestigia sudium ibidem usque hodie viswifur,
et^ videtnr inspectmitihus quod singular earum admoduni humani feinoris
arosscR et circumfusce plumbo immobilifer ha:reant in profundumjiuniinis
vnfixfe. Bedae Hist. Eccl. i. 3.) Bede's account of these stakes is pro-
bably correct ; but, as it is not likely that in the hurry of a sudden defence,
like that against Caesar's march, the Britons would have the time to erect
posts of this magnitude, and case them with lead, we are justified in sup-
posing that the stakes existing in Bede's time were a Roman work of a later
period connected in some way with the navigation or fishery of the Thames,
which we cannot now explain, and that they had nothing to do with Caesar's
passage of the river.
CHAP. II.] MANNERS OF BRITOXS. 37
those from which they came. Tliis statement is corroborated by
die list of Britisli tribes given by subsequent writers, in which
the Hedui of Somersetshire, the Morini of Dorset, the Senones
of Hampsliire, the Ehemi (another name of the Bibroci) of Berk-
shire and Surrey, the Attrebates, stretching from the former
county into Hampshire, the Cimbri of the borders of Devon,-
had all their representatives in Gaul. The people of Cantium
(Kent) were the most civilized of all the ih'itish tribes, and in
tlu'ir manners bore a strong resemblance to their Gallic neigh-
bours. The maritime districts were essentially corn countries,
for it was the Belgic settlers who introduced agriculture ; the
wild tribes of the interior did not cultivate the earth, but^
they lived on milk and flesh, and clothed" themselves with ^
skins. All the Britons, we are assnred by Csesar, s^tained-
themselves with a blue dye made from woad, to give them a
more teri-ible appearance in battle ; and they wore their hair
long, and shaved every part of the body but the head and
upper lip. A sentiment of national pride has led many wi iters
to doubt the truth of Csesar's account of the prevalence of
p.olygamy among the Britons, and he was probably speaking-
only of the maritime districts when he tells us with a tone of
wonder of their numerous population, and of the frequency of.
buildings which resembled those of the Gauls. Cattle were very
abundant. But the Britons had no money, using in place of it
pieces of brass or iron rings, reduced to certain standard weight.*
White pluvibum (tin) was procured in the midland districts,
and iron Avas found, though not very abundant, in the parts
bordering on the sea.f Brass, Caesar tells us, Avas imported
from abroad. The island produced timber of every kind, except
beech and fir.
Such Avas Britain as known to Julius Caesar. Two nearly
contemporary writers, Strabo the geographer, and the historian
Diodorus Siculus, have supplied us with some information
omitted by him, and probably obtained from subsequent com-
munications^ Avith the island. These authors describe the island
as being for the most part flat and Avoody, having hoAvever,
'many strong places on hills.' The produce, they tell us, con-
sisted of corn and cattle, gold, silver, and iron, Avith skins, .
* ' Utuntur aut a?re aut annulis ferreis ad certum pondus examinatis pru
nummo.'— Csesar, Bell. Gall. lib. v. c. 10.
t Ca3sar may perhaps be supposed to have taken Cornwall for a midland
district, as it was far from the country in which he was engaged. His
iion district Avas perhaps the weald of Sussex and Kent.
33 THE BRITONS. [chap. n.
slaves, and dog's of a superior breed for the chase. The British
doj^s were widely celebrated, and so strong and fierce that the
Gauls are said to have nsed them in war. The aboriginal
l-5ritons are described as being- tall of statnre, and corpnlent,
but not well made. According to Strabo, although they nsed
milk in great abundance, they were not acquainted with the art
of making cheese, and they were total strangers to gardening
and agriculture. Diodorus describes them as practising agri-
culture, gathering the corn and storing it up in the stalk in
thatched houses, out of which 'they plucked the old ears from
day to day, and used them to make their food. ' Their houses,
we are told, were mere temporary establishments, foi-med in the
foi'ests by enclosing a space with felled trees, within Avhich they
made huts of reeds and logs, and sheds for their cattle, 'not
intended to remain long' (oh irpac ttoXvv xpovov). Cfesar as
we have seen alludes to the tin {plumbum albnui, as it is named
also by Pliny), which appeal's to have been the principal export
of Britain in those remote ages; and Strabo tells us that 'the
inhabitants o\ Britain who live near the Belerian promontory
I (the Land's End, Cornwall), are peculiarly hospitable, and, from
I Uie great resort of foreigners, more polished in manners than the
others. They prepare the tin, and show much skill in working
the earth which produces it. This being of a stony nature and
having- earthv veins in every direction, thev work their wav into
tliese veins, and so by means of water separate the fragments,
These they bruise into small pieces, and convey to an island
which lies in front of Britain, called Ictis [Wight ? or perhaps an
island on the Cornish coast] ; for at the great ebb of the tide
the channel becomes dry, and they carr^ver the tin in large
quantities on waggons. From Ictis the tin is purchased by
native merchants, and transported to Gaul.' The same writer
tells us that ivory bracelets, necklaces, vessels of glass, and
such like small wares, were usually imported from Gaul into
Britain.
In comparing these writers, we have some difficulty in
separating the characteristics of the maritime states from those
which applied only to the tribes of the interior ; but it seems
clear that the island was then inhabited by two very distinct
v/ races, differing no doubt /in language as well as in manners.
The country extending along the coast from the mouth of the
Humber to Devonshire, and stretching inwardly perhaps througli
the modern counties of Hertford, Buckingham, and Berk-
shire, was possessed by tribes who had passed over from the
CHAP. II.] THE LATER BRITONS. 39
Continent, and driven tlie aboriginal inliabitants into tlie in-
terior. They Avere distiiigiiislied by a mncli hig-her civilization,
especially in Kent, which had j^robably been settled more re-
cently than the others, and althongh they had no towns projDcrly
so called, they had permanent dwellings, and were extensively
employed in cultivating the land. The primitive Britons wan-
dered over the interior of the island, driving their herds and
flocks from pasture to pastnre, having no fixed habitation, but
throwing up tem|)orary dwelling-places for security for them-
selves and their cattle — in fact, living precisely in the same
manner as the wild Irish three centu.ries ago. In a few places
accidental circumstances led the natives to adopt a more settled
mode of life, and to become less barbarous. This was especially
the case in Cornwall, where, from a remote period, the ti'ade in
the metals produced so abundantly in that district had, as
Strabo says, brought them into a continued intercourse wdth
merchants from foreign lands, but chietiv, it would appear, from
Gaul.
During the long period of a century, from the time of Caesar
to that of Claudius, we have scarcely any information relating
to the island of ]5ritain. We have seen that, before Csesar left
its shores, all the tribes in the south-east from the Iceni or
Cenimagni of Snfiblk to the inhabitants of Hampshire, had
agreed to acknowledge the supremacy of Eome. Among the
chiefs of these ti'ibes there appears to have arisen a sudden
emulation of imitating Roman forms and manners — a sort of
pride, as we might say, of wearing the livery of their masters.
l3ritons now w^ere seen not unfreqiiently in Rome, and travellers
from Italy probably made their way throngh (laul to visit the
distant home of the strangers whose appearance in the south
must always have excited curiosity. The feeling of eai^-erness
for what was called friendship with Rome seems to have soon
spread into other parts of the island, and when Strabo was writ-
ing his Geography, British ambassadors were in Rome, bowing
to the throne of Augustus. 'At present,' he says, ' some of
their princes have sent ambassadors to cidtivate the friendship
of Augustus Caesar, and have deposited offerings in the Capitol,
thus bringing the whole island to be in friendly connection wdth
the Romans.' *
* Strabo's account is fully confirmed by an insci'iption in honour of
Augustus, found aJi-i^iL'or;!.. in Asia Minor, in >vhicb/,-^among the public
acts of tins eniperorV^reig^u, the submission of the Britisli princes is
mentioned. The Latin text of this inscription, which is completed from
^
V
40 THE BRITONS. [chap. ii.
Among the various arts now imported from Eome was that
of coining nioiiew No evidence lias vet been discovered to
make ns doubt the truth of C;x3sar's statement that, when he
visited the ishuid, the ]5ritons had no coinage; bnt soon afU r
that event mints were established in Britain, and we lind nu-
merous coins, many of which bear inscriptions in Roman
characters. Most of these inscriptions evidently give us the
names of British chiefs who, sinc(> their 'friendship' with Rome,
assumed the title of reges, and they adopted the foruud.i of the
coinage of Augustus, cj^sar divi filius. The history of this
coinage is still very obscure, but the eaiiier examples seem to make
us acquainted with two distinct families of chiefs, both of which
are connected with the ditt'ereut tribes who submitted to Csesar.
The poAver which in Caesar's time had been held by Cassivel-
launus, appears to have descended to a prince namect Tasciova-
nus, who was father of the (we may say) celebrated C'unobelinus
or Cunobeline.* The latter, we know, had three sons, Adnun-
ius, Caratacus or Caractacus, and Togodumniis. Another, and
apparently contemporary (or nearly contemporary), family of
Jiritish kings, named Eppillus (or Ippillus), Yeric, Yiric, or
]^eric, and a name of which only the first syllable Tine is known,
are described on a number of coins as sons of a British chief
named Comius.f There is no necessity for believing that the
latter was the Commius whose name occurs in Caesar's transac-
tions with the British chiefs. The coinage of Tasciovanus and
of Cunobeline was very numerous, and it furnishes us with
another piece of very important information, for it appears from
the inscriptions on it that after the Britons had become more in-
timately acquainted with their Roman allies they began to imi-
the parallel Gi-eek text, is, Britannorum reges, Damno, Eellatinos, ct
Tiinan, Sicambrorum Maelo, Marcoiuaiinoruiu Suebo, tideiii petiveruiit
nieam (the kings of the Britons, Danino, Bellaunos, and Tinian, of the
Sicambri Maelo, and of the Marconianni Suebo, submitted to me).
* The legend on the coins of Cunobeline is cunokelixus tasciovaxi
F HEX, in one or two instances complete, but in general mure or less abbre-
viated. I believe that it was Mr Birch who pointed out ^he simple and
natural explanation that F stood for the \.^i\.xv filius. Mr Beale Poste has
given, in a series of papers in the Journal of the British Archaeological
Association, a very different explanation of this and the whole series of the
British coinage, supported by an ingenious train of argument, which,
however, appears to me neither convincing nor satisfVictory, as being
founded too much, on assumptions and suppositions. Like every other
branch of archaeology or historical inquiry which is very imperfectly
known, the coins of the ancient Britons furnish a wide field for speculative
theory.
t The legends on the most perfect specimens are, eppillus comi f,
VEKIC COM F KEX, and TING COM F HEX.
CHAP. II.] THE BRITISn COIXAGE. 41
tate them in buildino; stationary towns. The coins of Tuscio-
vaniis Avere struck at Verlamiiim, as it is spelt on the coins,
wliich was no doubt the capital of that prince ; his son Cnno-
Ijeline fixed his chief residence at Camulodunum (Colcliester, in
Essex), on the borders of the Iceni, who acknowledged his
power, the name of which also is impressed on his money.*
The coins of the sons of Comius bear no indication of the place
where they were minted, but it seems probable from the locali-
ties in which they have been founds that Eppillus nded in Kent, y'"
and that Veric and Tine were joint or rival chiefs
(or perhaps one succeeded the other), in Sussex and Hampshire.
During* the reigns of Augustus and Tiberius, making to-
gether a period of nearly eighty years, the British states which
had submitted to Julius Csesar were left in that position of
friendship or alliance with Home which we have already de-
scribed, and history tells us nothing of their condition or of tlie
actions of tiieir chiefs. We know that Cunobelinus, who has
been made familiar to every Englisii ear by Shakespeare under
the name of Cymbeline, was living in the time of the latter of
the two emperors just mentioned, but the stories of that chief's
intercourse with Augustus, resting on no very early authority,
are evidently monkish fables. The very numerous coinage of
Cunobeline, and its superior execution, show that he was a
powerful and distinguished prince ; yet war and sedition pre-
vailed among the tribes under his command, and in his latter
years, the rivalry among his own sons arose to such a height
that he was obliged to banish one of them, Adininius, from his
court. Adminius, with a few of his adherents, hurried to Rome,
and claimed the protection of Caligula, who had now succeeded
to the imperial throne. The British refugees were received as
vassals of the Empire, and were exhibited in triumph to the
Romans, and Caligula having placed himself at the head of an
army, marched to the coast of Gaul with the declared intention
of restoring Adminius and reducing Britain to a province. But
this vaunted expedition ended ingioriously ; instead of passing
* It has been conjectured, that one or two legends, not yet understood,
may be names of towns. A coin beaiing- the name tascio (for Tascio-
vanus or Tasciovani) has sego on the reverse, which, some interpret as
Segontium, the name of a town, while others make it Segonax, the name
of a chief, perhaps a son of Tasoiovanus. It has, in a similar manner,
been sug<icsted that calle, vricon, soliuo, and cun, found on coins most
of whicli appear to have belonged to Tascio vanus and Cunobelin, indicate .
towns named Calleva, Uriconium, Solidunum, and Cunetio. In the tirst \/
of these, the word hex, joined with calle, seems to prove that it is the
name of an individual ; and the others arc far from certain.
s/
4'-' THE BRITONS. [chap. ii.
over into Britain, the Romnn soldiers Avere ordered to o-ather
sliells on the beach, antl they were then led back to Eon;e to
triumph in what were called the ' spoils of the ocean.'
In the mean while, Britain seems to have been more and more
disturbed witli civil strife. As far as we can understand by a
comparison of the slig-ht notices preserved by the Roman annal-
ists, with the yet imperfectly explained British coins, tlie sor.s
of Cunobeline, who was now dead, were oppressiu"- the sons of
Comius. One of the latter, called by l3io Cassius, Bericus,
pi'obably the Veric of the coins, was compelled to iiy from the
island, and took refuge at the court of Claudius, to whom he
explained the state of Britain and the facility with which, at
that moment, it might be conquered. We are told that the
Britons sent to Rome to demand that the fugitives should be
delivered up, and that the refusal was accompanied with re-
criminations on the irregularity with which the islanders had of
late paid their tribute. Claudius, anxious to deserve a triumph
by some military exploit, listened willingly to the representatives
of the fugitive chief, and found an excuse for hostilities in the
complaints of the l^ritons. An army was collected in the spring
of the year 43, under the command of a senator of distinction,
named Aulus Plautius ; but the legions mutinied at the pros-
pect of an expedition which seemed to expose them to the perils
of the unknown ocean, and it was not until after much labour
and anxiety that their fears were calmed, and they were per-
suaded at length to embark. They landed on the shores oi"
l^ritain in the autumn of the same year. The Britons, who
seem to have formed no combined plan of resistance, retired to
the woods and marshes, and it was some time before the Romans
could discover their retreat, and bring them to battle. At length,
however, the Britons ventured to fight, not collectively, but in
divisions, and Plautius defeated first Caractacus (who is named
by Dio Cassius, our authority for these events, Cataracus), and
then his brother Togodunmus. In pursuing these chiefs, the
Roman commander had overrun the south of England as
far as Oxfordshire and Gloucestershire, the country of the
Dobuni, who were at this time under the dominion of the Ca-
tuellani, the hereditaiy tribe of Cassivellaiinus, and probably of
Cunobeline. The Dobuni submitted, and Plautius raised a
fortress and left a garrison to hold them in subjection, and then
pursued the sons of Cunobeline. Among the distinguished
officers w^ho served in Britain under Plautius were two future
emperors, Vespasian, and his son Titus. In one of the obsti-
CHAi'. II.] WAR WITH THE ROMANS. 43
nate eno;a<>-emeiits Avitli the Britons, which occuiTed after tlie
advance of the Romans from the countiy of the Dobimi, the life
of the fatlier was saved only by the bravery of his son. It was
thus in our island, as it has been well observed, that the arms
were trained, which were destined to be the instrument of God's
vengeance against the stubborn people of Israel. The sons of
C'unobeline, after having retreated before the Romans towards
tiie west, seem to have doubled upon their pursuers, and to
have souglit refuge in the marshes which covered the lower part
of Essex towards the mouth of the Thames, Here also they
were pursued and attacked, and Togodumnus, one of the
brothers, was slain in battle. The death of their chief seems to
have provoked the Britons to a more obstinate resistance, and
the Roman commander found himself obliged to act upon the
defensive. He sent information of his position to the emperoi',
Avho hastened to command in person his legions in Britain. On
the arrival of Claudius, they again crossed the Thames, defeated
the Britons in battle, and took possession of Camulodunum, the
royal seat of Cunobeline. The Britons now submitted, and the
emperor hastened back to Rome to celebrate his trinmph, leav-
ing Aulus Plautius in command of the army. The emperor
and his son were both honoured by the senate with the title of
Britannicus, and a coin was subsequently struck to commemor-
ate the conquest of the Britons.*
That conquest, however, Avas as yet very imperfect, and in-
cluded only the south-eastern district of the island. But a
foreign power, like that of Rome, established in a hostile manner
ill one district of Britain, coidd not long remain without excuses
for attacking the others. The south-western division of the
island, extending from Hampshire to the extremity of Cornwall,
was held by two powerful tribes, called the Belgae and the ^
Damnonii or Dumnonii. Both appear to have been late settlers
from the opposite continent, and to have been able to resist
successfully the influence of Cunobeline. In retaliation for as-
sistance, wliich they had probably given against the Romans in
the war with Caractacus and Togodumnus, their country was
now invaded by Vespasian with the second legion, and after an
* This coin, which is found in silver and prold, has a laureated head
of Chiudius on the obverse, with the inscription, Tl . clavd . caesar .
AVG . p . M . TR . v . VI . IMP . XI, which is to be read, Tiberius Claxidius
C(tsar Augustus, pontifex maxinius, Tribunitia potestate sextum, imperator f
u)idecimu>n. On the reverse, a triumphal arch is surmounted by an "
equestrian statue between two trophies, with the inscription de britann,
i.e. de Britarons, on the conquest of the Britons.
^
44 THE BRITONS. [chap. it.
obstinate and apparently a long- stnig-g-le, in wliicli Vespasian
foug-ht nearly thirty battles and captnred twenty of the British
oppida, or fortified posts, these two tribes, with the adjacent
island of Vectis (Wight), were reduced to submission.*
Previous to the year 50, Aulus Plautius was recalled, and he
seems to have left the Koman legions engaged in war with the
Britons. It was now the tribes of the interior who had taken
up arms against the invaders, and were making inroads upon
the tribes who had submitted to them, considering their submis-
sion as a just cause for attacking and plundering them. They
had chosen for this attack the moment when the lloman army
in Britain was without a commander-in-chief, and when the
immediate approach of winter promised them a sufficient period
of impunity to enable them to secure their booty. In the midst
of this confusion, a new governor ox proprcetor of Britain arrived
from Eome. His name was Ostorius Scapula, a good soldier,
and a man of eminent abilities. He had no sooner landed than
he collected such troops as were at hand, and, falling upon the
Britons unexpectedly, defeated them with great slaughter, and
drdve them out of the Roman territory. He then proceeded to
inclose and protect the latter with a line of forts from the Avon
to the Severn, f from which it appears that the whole country
within these rivers, from the farthest coast of Norfolk to the
Land's-End, and thence to the extreme point of Kent, had at
this time, voluntarily or by compulsion, submitted to the power
of Rome.
Among those Avho had submitted voluntarily was the ex-
tensive and powerful tribe of the Iceni, who occupied the
modern counties of Suffolk, Norfolk, Cambridge, and Hunting-
don, The Iceni were jealous of the attempt of the Romans to
establish their power by these forts, and, confident in their oavu
strength, which had not yet been tried with the Romans, they
* Our know]edp:e of this war is taken chiefly from Suetonius, who says
of Vespasian, ' Inde in Britanniam translatus, tricies euni hoste conflixit,
duas\alidissirnas gentes, superquo xx. oppida, et insulam Vectem Brit-
anniae proximani, in deditioneni redegit.' From the niention of the island
.of Vectis, and other circumstances, there seems little reason to doubt that
the du(e ijentes were the Belfi:8e and the Damnonii, although it is not so
clear whether the thirty (or, according- to Eutropius, thirty-two) batlles did
not include four or five battles Vespasian is known to have fought in the
previous war.
t ' Cinctosque castris Anton am et Sabrinam fluvios cohibere parat.' —
Tacitus. The Antona is usually considered to be the Nen, but it seems
more probable that it here signifies the Avon. I understand that sonio
editions or MSS. read Ai(foiia.
CHAP. II. J DEFEAT OF THE BRIG ANTES. 45
put themselves at the head of a confe^leracy, with some of the
ueig-hbounn<>- tribes, and when Ostorius marched against them,
they prepared for battle in a place which they had inclosed
with ramparts of earth, with a narrow entrance to hinder the
approach of cavalry.* But this was of little avail against the
discipline of their opponents, and Ostorins, with only a few
cohorts of auxiliaries, attacked them in their entrenchments,
made a breach for the entrance of his cavalry, and defeated
them with great slaughter. The Iceni now returned to
their obedience, and other tribes, which had before hesitated,
submitted.
Beyond the boundary which Ostorius had formed by his line
of forts, the interior of the isLuid was inhabited by tribes who
were fiercer and less civilized than the southern nations. The
chief of these was the great tribe of the Brigantes, extending
through the mountainous and wooded districts from the borders
of Lincolnshire, through Torkshire, Lancashire, Westmoreland,
Cumberland, and Northumberland. The lesser tribes, such as
the Cornavii and Coritavi, which were intermediate between the
tribes subject to the Romans and the Brigantes, probably ac-
knowledged the superiority of the latter. The Brigantes seem
to have been so much discouraged by the defeat of the Iceni,
that they souglit the alliance of, or rather bought their' peace
with, the Romans. Ostorius, I'elieved from the hostilities of
the various tribes just mentioned, carried his arlny into Shrop-
shire and North Wales, and had proceeded as far as the tribe of
the Cangii on the shores of the Irisli Sea, when he was recalled
by a revolt of the Brigantes, which was apparently partial and
easily subdued. The only formidable enemy now in arms on
the borders of the Roman possessions was the tribe of the
Silures, which had rallied under Caractacus, the defeated son of
Cunobeline, who, after various turns of fortune, hnd been elected
tlie chief of this tribe, and eiitered into a confederacy with the
Ordovices of North Wales.
After the defeat of the Brigantes, Ostorius gave his attention
to the interior arrangement of the province committed to his
cliarge. He made Camulodunum, wliich was raised to the rank
of a colonla, the head-quarters of the Roman power, and estab-
lished there a numerous body of veterans, among whom the
conquered lands were distributed. The city was adorned with
public buildings, and more especially with a temple dedicated
* _' Locum pugnae delegrere, septum agresfi ajrgere, et aditu angusto ne
pervius equiti foret.' — Tacitus, An/ial., lib. xii. c. 31.
>/
46 THE BRITONS. [uhap. ii.
to Claudius, and was increased in size and importance. Havinuj
settled these things to his satisfaction, Ostorius marclu^d aii,-ainst
Caractacns. That chief, leaving- the more open country of tlie
Silures to be overrun by the enemy, had withdrawn into tlie
wilder country of the Ordovices, where he chose a strong-
position, difficult of access even without the assistance of arti-
ticial defences. On the more accessible parts of the high hills
he threw up a kind of rampart of stone, while below and in
front was a river difficult to ford.* Here the British chief
awaited the attack of his enemies, or, perhaps, amused himself
with the belief that his stronghold was too formidable to be
attempted, for he had with him his family, consisting of a wife
and daughter. The Britons, thus posted, and excited by the
example and exhortations of their leader, presented a formidable
appearance to the Roman legionaries, protected as they were by
the river which ran before them, and the steep declivity Avhich
rose in their way. ' But the soldiers,' to use the words of
Tacitus, ' were clamorous for the attack, crying out that their
valour would overcome all opposition ; and the inferior officers
breathing the same sentiments, gave additional courage to the
troops. Ostorius, after reconnoitring the ground to see which
parts were impenetrable and which accessible, led on the eagei-
soldiers, and with much difficulty crossed the river. When they
came to the rampart, while the enemy threw their javelins at a
distance, our sokliers sutfered most, and many were slain ; but
when ours closed their ranks and placed their shields over them,
they soon tore down the rough irregular piles of stones, and
attacking the enemy on level ground obliged them to fly to the
hills. Thither also both the light and heavy armed soldiers
followed, the former attacking them with their speai-s, the latter
in a dense body, till the Britons, who had neitlier armour nor
helmets to protect their persons, were thrown into disorder, and
if they made any resistance to the auxiliaries, they were cut in
pieces by the swords and spears of the legionaries, and when
* ' Tunc montibus arduis, et si qua clementer accedi poterant in moduni
valli saxa praestruit ; et praofluebat atnnis vado incerto, catervaquo niajor-
utn pro munimentis consisterant.' — Tacitus. A lofty mountain at the
northern extremity of the Stretton Hills in Shropshire, still called Caer
Caradoc, has been supposed by some to be the scene of the final defeat of
Caractacus, but this is very uncertain, or perhaps we had better say very
improbable. To other hills the same honour has been given, and with
perhaps about the same degree of reason. From the account of Tacitus,
the position of the Britons on this occasion would seem to have been part
of a mountain range, but we have not sufficient detail to enable us to
identify it.
I
CHAP. II.] DEFEAT OF CARACTACUS. 47
they turned upon the ktter, the auxiliaries destroyed them with
their sabres and javc4ins.'*
This victory was a decisive one. The wife and daughter of
Caractacus fell into the hands of the conquerors, and two
brothers who had shared his fortunes submitted. Caractacus
himself escaped from the battle, and fled to the tribe of the
Brigantes, from whose queen, Cartismandua, he sought prot(!C-
tion : but this princess, anxious to remain in friendship with
the liomans, threw him into chains and delivered him to his
enemies. The dignifled appearance of Caractacus and his ')
family at the court of Eome, as related bv the historian I
Tacitus, is the theme of every schoolboy. The loss of their y
leader did not discourage the Silures, who, trusting to their
woods, continued to carry on a flerce warfare against the
liomans, cutting off their stragglers, and in more than one
instance nearly overwhelming the legions which were left to
erect fortresses in their country. ' After this,' says Tacitus,
' there was incessant fighting, generally of a predatory charac-
ter; sometimes the annies would meet in the woods, at other
times in the midst of marshes, according as chance or their
own headlong valour directed : many an engagement took place
by accident, while others were the result of stratagem and
military manosuvre ; many an expedition was undertaken to
revenge some previous defeat, while others had plunder for
their object ; and they were sometimes undertaken by order of
the generals, and at other times without their knowledge.
The Silures were the most obstinate in their resistance, and
their obstinacy was increased by the threat of the Roman
commander, that he would root the very name of the Silures
out of Britain, as had been done with the Sigambri, who had
been transported to Gaul. These words enraged the Silures,
who assailed and cut off' two cohorts of the auxiliaries, and
stirred up the other tribes to revolt by giving them a large
share of their booty, and thus exciting their love of plunder.
In the midst of these disorders, Ostorius, overcome by the
troubles with which he was surrounded, departed this life ; and
the Britons rejoiced at his death, not merely as if they had
gained a battle, but rather as if the war w^as entirely at an
end.'
An old officer, Avitus Didius Gallus, was appointed to
succeed Ostorius as propraetor, and hastened to Britain to take
* ' Et si auxiliaribus resisterent, gladiis ao pilis le^ionariorum, si liac
verterent, spathis et hast is auxiliarium sternebautur.'
4S THE ERITONS. [chap. ii.
tlie command. Before he arrived, a Eoman legion had been
defeated l)y the Sikires, but he immediately marched ag-ainst
them, and gave them in their turn a sev^ere defeat. Then,
\{ unequal to the arduous character of this war, Didius left it to
be conducted by his subordinate officers, and relapsed into the
inactivity which was moi'e in accordance with his advanced ajre.
It was probably in this war that tlie second legion, which had
had Vespasian for its commander, was established at Isca
(Caerleon, on the Usk),
At the time of the arrival of Didius in Britain, a civil war
arose among the Brigantes, which threatened to add to the
embarrassments of the Romans. I have already mentioned
that this powerful tribe was now governed by a queen, named
Cartismandua, Avho proved a woman of high spirit and some
abilities. Her conduct Avith regard to Caractacus had naturally
drawn upon her the hatred of those who w^ere most hostile to
the liomans, and this included many of her own subjects. She
had married one of her chiefs, named Venusius, who, as far as
vve can gather from the brief account of Tacitus, quarrelled with
his wife because she would not surreiuler to him the supreme
power over her tribe, and he then placed himself at the head of
a party in the state who cried out against the indignity of men
living under the rule of a woman. Cartismandua, wdiose party
appears, at first, to have been the strongest, claimed the pro-
tection of the Romans, and her husband, Avho seems to have
been driven from among the Brigantes, endeavoured to make
himself popular among the other tribes, by now placing himself
at the head of the party who were in arms against the invaders.
It Avas this man who, connnanding the Silures and their allies,
had defeated the Koman legion connnanded by Manlius Valens
before the arrival of the new propraetor Didius. After this
success, Venusius, collecting his allies, and joined by the party
of the Brigantes who were opposed to the Roman influence,
proceeded to make war on his wife Cartismandua, who had
crushed the first attempt against her government, and captured
and put to death a brother and other relatives of Venusius. A
Roman army was immediately sent to assist the queen of the
, Brigantes, and in a Avell-contested battle overcame the Britons
wiio were in arms against her. About the same time another
Roman legion, commanded by Csesius Nasica, obtained a
decisive victory over an army of Britons.
Thus the administration of Didius had not been entirely
without credit, when, towards the end of tlie year 58, he was
CHAP. II.] CAIUS SUETOXIUS PAULLINUS. 49
replaced by Yeranius, who made one or two successful expedi-
tions against the Silur^s ; but he died l)efore he had been a year
in Britain, at a moment wlien the g'reatest expectations were
formed from his military talents, lie was immediately suc-
ceeded by Caius Suetonius Paulliniis, one of tlie uiost warlike and
skdfnl of the imperial gvnerals. The Eoman arms had expeii-
enced a reverse [gravis claries) before the arrival of Suetonius, >/
and he found the districts from the Silures to the Brigautcs in
great disorder.
It seems that in Britain, as in Gaul, as foreign intercourse
and consequent civil is ition advanced, the head seat of the old
Druid ical religion was removed more and more into the remoter
districts, until in the latter country it established itself on the
Armorican coast and in the Channel Islands, and in the former
it retreated into the distant island of Mona (x\nglesea), equally
arrested in its further advances by the Avaves of the ocean,
We gather from the Eoman historians that it was the Druids
of Mona who excited the Ordovices and the Silures and their
other allies to obstinate resistance, and it was in that island
that were collected togetlier the bravest and bitterest enemies'
of the foreign invaders, ever ready to issue forth and incite
their countrymen to insurrection. Suetonius Paullinus soon
discovered the influence which Mona exercised against him, and
he determined to reduce it to obedience to Rome. For this
purpose he marched his forces to the coast of Caernarvonshire,
and having caused a number of flat-bottomed vessels to be
constructed, he placed the foot soldiers in them, and ordered
the cavalry to try to ford the strait which divided the island
from the mainland ; or, if they found this impossible, to go
in the boats and tow their horses after them. When they
approached the island, an miusual scene presented itself to
their view. ' The shore of the island was lined with the hos-
tile army, in which were Avomen dressed in dark and dismal
garments, with their hair streaming to the Avind, bearing torches
in their hands, and running like furies up and down the ranks.
Around stood the Druids, with hands spread to heaven, and
uttering dreadful prayers and imprecations. The novelty of the
sight struck our soldiers with dismay, so that they stood as if
petrified, a mark for the enemy's javelins. At length, animated
by the exhortations of their general, and encouraging one an-
other not to fear an army of women and fanatics, they rushed \f
upon the enemy, bore down all before them, and involved them
in their own fires. The troops of the enemy were completely
E
•50 THE BRITONS. [chap. ji.
defeated, a garrison placed in the island, and the groves wliicli
had been the consecrated scenes of the most barbarous super-
stitions, were levelled with the ground. It had been their
practice to sacrifice on the altars prisoners taken in war, and to
divine the pleasure of their gods by inspecting human entrails.'
Suetonius was called otf from this expedition by the most
>^ alarming revolt of the Britons in the Eoman province that had
hitherto occurred.
The Romans were seldom conciliatory or generous towards
the provinces they had conquered, and the empire was now
ruled by Nero, under whom those provinces were delivered to
the Avorst of tyranny, by governors whose only principle of
action was to grind the unfortunate people under tlieir cliarge
in order to contribute to the avarice and luxury of Rome. The
more distant the province, the more cruelly was it oppressed,
and Tacitus, in the account he gives us of the consultations
among the tributary chiefs in Britain on their wrongs, affords
a sufficient view of the manner in which this island was treated.
' They reflected,' he says, ' on the miseries attendant on servitude,
and when they came to compare their sevei'al injuries, they were
heightened tenfold by putting them together. It was clear that
passive submission would but encourage their oppressors to
proceed to still greater lengths. Instead of one king, as for-
merly, they had now two, the lieutenant and his procurator ;
the former exercising his tyranny over their persons, the latter
over their goods. Whetlier their governors were at harmony
together or at variance, it was alike fatal to their unhappy sub-
jects ; the one oppressed them by his troops and his centiu'ions,
the other by his insolence and extortion. Nothing was now safe
from their avarice, or from their licentiousness. In battle it was
the bravest or strongest man who carried off the spoil ; but here
the meanest-spirited and most contemptible of men entered and
pillaged their houses, carried away their children, and made
them enlist in the Roman armies as if they were ready to die
for anything but their country. If the Britons would but con-
sider their own numbers, they would find that the Roman troops
who were among them were but a paltry and inconsiderable
force. . . . Their country, with their wives and parents, should
be so many motives for them to support a Avar, to Avhich tlieir
enemies were urged only by avarice and luxury, and the armies
of Rome would no doubt retire as Ca3sar had done, if the
l^ritons would but imitate the bravery of their ancestors, and
not be discouraged by the issue of one or tAVO battles.'
CHAP. 11.] QUEEN BOADICEA. .51
It was usual, during the earlier period of the Eoman cou-
quest, to leave the British chiefs in nominal command of their
tribes, with more or less power or wealth, according to their
tried obedience and devotion to their imperial masters. In
(Jogidunus or Cogidnbnns, a chief of the Eegni of Sussex, we
have an instance of a British prince who was so faithful to the
Itoraans, that he was allowed to enjoy liis dignity and title of
rex, or king, from the reign of Claudius to tliat of Trajan, and
his name appeared down to the latest period of Roman rule oi'
an inscription as one of those who embellished the city of Reg-
num (Chichester) with public buildings.* Others, who, al-
though they acknowledged the supremacy of the Romans, bad
not shown the same submissive spirit, were treated more
oppressively. The Iceni, as we have seen, were kept in obedi-
ence only by fear, and. their chief, or king (as he was called),
Prasutagus, wlio had hoarded up immense wealth, dying in the
reign of Nero, when the licence of the imperial officers in the
provinces was at its height, attempted to secure protection for
his family by leaving one half of his riches to the emperor, and
the other half to his two daughters. But he was no sooner
dead, than the Roman officers took possession of his kingdom,
and treated it as a conquered province. His queen, Boadicea,
a woman of high spirit, resisted or expostulated, which only
provoked the haughty Rom.ans to act with greater brutality.
The queen was publicly scourged; her two daughters were
* In the earlier part of the last century, as some workmen were digging
a cellar in a house at the corner of St Martin' s-lane and North-street,
ill Chichester, they came to the massive walls of a building, near which
lay, with the inscribed face downwards, a mutilated stone with the follow-
ing inscription : —
. EPTVXO . ET . MINERVAE
TEMFLVM
. . O . SALVTE . DO . . . DIVIXAE
AVCTOKITA . . . CLAVD.
. . . GIDVBNI . R . L . . . VG . . . IN . BRIT.
. . . GIVM . FARROR . E . . QVI . IN . EG
. . . D . S . D . DONANTE . AREAM
. . . ENTE . PVDENTINI . FIL.
which has been read thus : ' Neptuno et Minervc^e templuin pro salute
domus divina3 ex auctoritate Tiberii Claudii Cogidubni regis iegati augusti
in Britannia collegium fabi'orum et qui in eo a sacris sunt de suo dedica-
verunt donante aream Pudente Pudentini filio.' This inscription refers, no
doubt, to the same British prince mentioned by Tacitus as receiving
favours from Claudius, and who appears by it to have taken the name of
the emperor in addition to his own. ' Qua3dam civitates C^giduno regi
erant donatsB ; is ad nostram usque memoriam fidissimus rcmansit, vetere
ac jam pridem recepta populi Romani consiietudiue ut haberet instrumenta
servitutis et re^'ss,.'— Tacit i Agric, c. 14.
52 THE BEITOXS. [chap. ii.
violated ; and otlicr meinbers of the royal family, or relatives
of the deceased chief, were thrown into prison, and even sold as
slaves. It is not to be wondered at if the Iceni rose in arms to
avenge their wrongs, and the Trinobantes of Essex immediately
joined in the revolt. The latter seem to have been goaded into
rebellion by the insolence of their Roman masters in Camnlo-
(lunnm. iVccordhig to Tacitus, ' they looked \i))on the temple
which the Romans had bnilt and dedicated to Claudius, as a
kind of citadel to hold them in perpetual bondage, and the
priests Avho celebrated religious worship in it as so many harpies
who lived upon the substance of the natives. It would be no
(litficult task, they thought, to destroy the Roman colony, for it
had no fortifications to protect it, an omission into which the
Romans were led by paying more attention to the gratification
of their luxury than to provide for their public safety,'
Before the insurrection broke out, the Romans appear to
have been alarmed by unequivocal indications of an approaching
storm, and we are told that there were not wanting prodigies
to warn them of their danger. The account wdiich Tacitus
gives of these is curious, as throwings ome light on the con-
dition of the town and country. ' At Camulodunum,' he tells
us, ' the statue of Nero fell to the ground, and turned its back
where the face had been, as if it fled before the enemy. Women
were seen as if mad, singing wild songs, in which they foretold
the destruction of the colony [perhaps they were native women,
aware of the conspiracy, and employed to create alarm]. Strange
noises were heard in the house of assembly, and loud bowlings
in the theatre. In the estuary of the Thames there was an
appearance like that of a sunken town. The sea assumed the
colour of blood, and human forms appeared to be left on the
shore by the ebbing tide. All these things were of a nature to
encourage the Britons, whilst they overwhelmed the veterans
Avith terror.' The inhabitants of Camulodunum, in their alarm,
applied for assistance to the procurator Catus Decianus, who
commanded in the absence of Suetonius, but who appears to
have slighted the warning. ' He sent them only two hundred
]nen, very imperfectly anned, and to these were added a small
body of soldiers belonging to the town. The temple of Claudius
was taken possession of by these troops, as a citadel, but their
measures of defence were thwarted by those around them who
Avere in the secret of the conspiracy ; so that they had neither
(lug a fosse nor cast up an earthen rampart for protection, and the
precaution, usual in such cases, of sending away the old men
CHAP. II.] ATTACK OX CAMULODUXinr. 53
and tlie women, and retaininf^ only the younj^ and active, had
l)een entirely neglected. They were, indeed, taken by surprise
in time of profound peace, and found themselves suddenly sur-
rounded by tlie bai-barians. Everything- but the temple was
plundered and burnt at the first attack, and the temple itself,
in which the soldiers had taken refuge, was captured after a
siege of two days.'
The success of the attack on Camulodunum gave courage
and force to the insurgents. It appears that the ninth legion,
commanded by its lieutenant, Petilius Cerealis, had its station-
ary camp witliin the territory of the Trinobantes. Cerealis
hurried to the relief of Camulodunum, but he arrived too late,
and, rashly engaging the insurgents, he w^as entirely defeated,
his infantry, comprising the great mass of the legion, was ut-
terly destroyed, and the cavalry, with Cerealis himself, fled to
their camp and shut themselves up in their entrenchments.
The alarm of the Romans was now so great, that the procurator ',,
Catiis, fearing to expose himself to the resentment of the !
natives whom his own avarice had excited to revolt, deserted/
his post and Hed into Graul. '
Suetonius, engaged in the reduction of the distant isLand of
Mona, heard of these alarming disorders, and hastened back.
As he approached towards the head seat of the Roman power in
Britain, he found the whole country in arms and in possession
of the insurgents. Nevertheless, ' he marched through the
midst of the enemy to Londinium (London), which was not yet
honoured with the name of a colony, but considerable from the
resort of merchants, and from its trade. Here, hesitating
whether he should make that town the seat of war, he con-
sidered how weak the garrison was, and warned by the check
which Petilins had incurred by his rashness, he determined to
preserve the whole by sacrificing one town. Nor did the tears
and lamentations of the people imploring his assistance prevent
him from giving the signal for marching, though he received
into his army all who chose to follow him. But all those whom
the weakness of sex, or the infirmities of age, or attachment to
the place, induced to stay behind, fell into the hands of the
enemy. The same calamity befell the municipal town of
Verulamium ; for the barbarians, neglecting the fortified
stations {casteUa) and garrisons, plundered the richer and more
defenceless places, their principal object being booty. Seventy
thousand citizens and allies are said to have perished in these
})laces ; for they made no prisoners to sell or exchange them,
54 THE ERITOXS. [ciiAr. n.
according to the usual practice in Avar, but thouglit of notliing
but slaughter, hauging, burning, and crucifying, as if to
retaliate for former sutteriugs, and eager to quench their thirst
for vengeance. '
The Eoman coramauder had wow collected about ten thousand
regular troops, consisting of the fourteenth legion with the
\' vexillarii of the twentietli, and tlie auxiliaries from the nearest
niilitarv posts, and he determined to give battle to the numer-
ous but tumultuous hordes who followed tlie stanchird of
J^oadicea. ' He made choice of a spot defended by defiles, and
closed in the rear by a forest, as the safest position to receive an
enemy who would make their attack in front, while the open
phiin before him relieved him from all fear of anduiscades. The
legionaries were drawn up in many deep ranks, the light-armed
troops disposed around in companies, and the Hanks coA^ered
Avith the cavalry. The British forces bounded about {exsuUahaiit)
in companies and troops, an innumerable multitude, and Avith
so niuch confidence that they brought their Avomen to be
Avitnesses of their victory, and placed them in Avaggons on the
outer circuit of the plain, Boadicea, Avho rode Avith her
daughters in a chariot, as she came to the several clans, Avith
Avhoni it Avas not unusual for a Avoman to command an army,
told them that she considered herself not as the descendant ot
noble ancestors, possessed of sovereignty and great riches, but
as one of the community, prepared to avenge the loss of liberty,
the stripes inflicted upon her body, and the dishonour done to
her daughters ; for the lusts of the Romans where risen to such
a height, that neither their persons, their age, nor their chastity
Avas safe. The gods, hoAvever, she said, favoured their just
reA^enge ; the legion which had attempted an engagement Avas
cut off ; those who had escaped had concealed themselves within
their fortresses (castrls) or Avere preparing for flight. The
Eoman army uoav opposed to them would never stand the
shouts and clamour of so many thousands, much less their
shock and fury. If they considered the number of forces, or
the causes of the Avar, they Avould resolve that day to conquer
or die ; this Avas the last resource for her, a Avoman ; let the
men, if they pleased, live and be slaves.'
This address of the British queen contains, at least, the senti-
ments that actuated the Britons in this revolt, as they Avere well
knoAvn to the contemporary Eoman historian, who has placed it
in her mouth. Suetonius also addressed his troops, urging them
not to fear the immense numbers of tlieir enemies, or to be
d
CHAP. II.] DEATH OF BOADICEi. - 65
alarmed at tlie dreadful shouts with which tliey were accustomed
to march into battle. The legion acted on the defensive, pro-
tected by its. position, until the fury of tlie first attack was
exhausted. It then formed in a Avedo-e, and marched steadily
on the Britons, while the auxiliaries made the same movement,
and the cavalry, rushini!; down with their spears levelled, bore
all before them. The Britons were soon routed with terrible
slaugiiter, for the circle of wag-gons impeded their liight, and
the Roman soldiers spared none, but massacred the women, and
even the beasts. Eighty thousand Britons are said to liave
been slain on this fatal day, and then queen Boadicea, unwill-
ing- to survive the destruction of her country, put an end to her
own life by taking poison.*
The Iceni were utterly crushed in this revolt. The numbers
assembled in the last disastrous battle, and the fact of their
being accompanied with their women, show that the tribes
engaged in it had arisen eii masse, and their country was now
left without defenders, and probably almost without inhabitants.
Their lands were overrun and plundered by the Roman troops,
and all the other tribes Avhose inclinations were known to be
hostile or wavering, were ravnged by tire and sword. The
troops wiiYQ augmented by the arrival of two thousand legion-
aries, eight cohorts of auxiliaries, and a thousand horse from
Germany; and out of these, the ninth legion, which had suf-
fered so much, was recruited. Although the war lingei-ed on
for a time, the defeat of tliis insurrection had fixed so firmly
the Roman yoke, that we hear no more of serious revolts in
the conquered provinces, although from time to time an out-
break among the oppressed natives furnished the excuse for
destroying the families of their chiefs and reducing the natives
to a more degrading state of slavery.
The reduction of the rebellion of the Iceni led, however, to
at least a temporary change of policy towards the Britons, and
even the Roman soldiers seem to have been satiated with the \/
wholesale slaughter. Suetonius Paullinus appears to have beeu
a harsh and rigorous ruler, and his disinclination to show any
* Our iiuniisiiiatists have ascribed to Boadicea certain British coins
which bear the inscription bodvoc. I think too hastily ; for the history
of the Britisli queen is that of a hurried insurrection, suppressed imme-
diately, and scarcely atibrdin<i- time for a distinctive coinag-e. Previous
to the rising:, she had no authority or power, and the miserable woman y
who Avas subject to the lash at the pleasure of her Roman masters, is not
likely to have possessed a mint. Boduoc may have been some one of the
British chiefs whose existence has not been recoided by history.
.56 THE BIIITONS. [chap. ii.
It'iiity towards the conquered Britons is said to have been a
subject of dispute between the general and the new procurator,
.Iiilius CLissicianus, who had l)een sent as tlie successor of the
fuuitive Catus Decianus. Polycletus, an imperial agent, re-
paired to Britain to enquire into the state of the province, and
it was probably his report that led soon after to the recall of
Suetonius. He was succeeded byPetronius Turpilianus, a man
who had just laid down the consulship, and whose only qualifi-
catiou mentioned by the historian, Avas a spirit of forberirance
and lenity, which the commanders who had been accustomed to
tyrannise over conquered nations looked upon with contempt.
The mild administration of this proprietor, however, soothed the
wounds with wliich this distant province was bleeding, and
seems to have wiped away the last traces of the ferocious
struggle which had taken place under his predecessor. A short
time before the death of Nero, Petronius resigned his office and
was succeeded by Trebellius Maximus, who governed the
province with equal moderation and aflability. While the rest
of the empire was torn by civil commotion, the province of
l^ritain enjoyed unusual tranquillity, and was disturbed only by
a quarrel between the propraetor and Roscius Cnelius, the
lieutenant of the twentieth legion. As the soldiers seem in
general to have taken part Avith Coelius, this feud ended in the
flight of Trebellius, who went alone and without followers to
join the standard of Yitellius, leaving Britain to be governed
nominally by the lieutenants of the ditt'erent legions, but really
by Roscius Ccclius. Yitellius had already drawn from Britain
a body of eight thousand troops, while Suetonius Paulliuus had
carried over the whole of the fourteenth legion to tight under
the standard of Otho.
When Yitellius had rid himself of his competitors, and
secured the purple, he sent to Britain, as propraetor, one of his
immediate attendants, Yettius Bolanus, who carried back with
him the fourteeiith legion, which was in disfavour, because it
had fought for one of the unsuccessful pretenders to the throne.
Tacitus tells us that the government of Bolanus ' was too mild
for so fierce a province ; and that Agricola, who was still
serving in Britain, checked the ardour of his own martial dispo-
sition, lest he should be suspected of disobedience or disaffection
towards his commander-in-chief.' The insecurity of the pro-
vince was increased by the number of troops which were now
draughted off to join in the new struggle for the empire be-
tween Yitellius and Yespasian. It was at this moment that
CHAP. II.] REVOLT OF THE BEIGAXTES. 57
symptoms of insubordination ajijain l)eg-an to show tliemselves
among the Britons Tlie insurrection began with the extensive
ti-ibe of the Brigantes, where the autliority of Cartismandua
app(!ars to have been still supported by tlie Romans.* Tliis
imperious lady remained separated from her husband, and in
contempt of him, she had taken to lier bed his armour-bearer,
Vellocatus, and deputed to him a part of her power. Many of
her subjects were shocked by this scandalous proceeding, and
Veuusius soon raised a powerful party, and pursued tlie queen
with so much vigour, that she was only rescued with difficulty
by a body of Eomau troops after several battles. The revolt
of the Brigantes had become so general, that the Eomaus were
obliged for a moment to leave them in a state of independence
with Venusius at their head.
On the accession of Vespasian, various changes were made
in the establishment in Britain, Petilius Cerealis, the com-
mander of the ninth legion, who had incurred the signal disaster
in the war against Boadicea, was sent to succeed Vettius Bo-
lanus as propraetor, while an officer of great talents, both as a
soldier and as a statesman, Julius Agricola, was appointed to
the command of the twentieth legion, which had shown some
unwillingness to acknowledge the new emjjcror. An attectionate
friendship had long subsisted between Agricola and Cerealis,
and they joined heartily in carrying on tlie Avar which had now
broken out in Britain. But after several successful engage-
ments with the Brigantes, by which a large portion of that tribe
was reduced to obedience, Cerealis was recalled, and Julius
Frontinus appointed in his place. Under this propraetor the
iSdures, who had hitherto remained independent in the fast-
nesses of the mountains, and had perhaps taken part with
the Brigantes, were conquered. Bnt the spirit of disaffection
was now spreading widely, and when in the year 78, Julius
Prontinus was recalled, the Ordovices of North Wales rose and
destroyed a troop of cavalry which was stationed in their
country, and various other tribes were preparing to rise in a
general revolt.
At this moment the man of all others most capable of
wrestling with the dangers which seemed on all sides to threaten
* From the manner in which Tacitus introduces the history of Cartis-
mandua and her husband in the Histories and the Annals, it appears
Mimewhat confused, and it has been usual to regard the two notices as
relating- to one event. I think, however, that they are distinct, and I have
treated them so in this sketch.
63 . THE BEITOXS. [chap. ir.
the province, was appointed as a successor to Prontinns. It
was towards the close of the sunnner of the year 78, when
\/ Jidius Agricola returned Irom Ronie to assume the g'overnnient
of Britain. In spite of the advanced period of the year, lie im-
mediately assembled the legions and a small nundjer of the
auxiliaries, and, marching into the mountains of the Ordovices,
he caused nearly the whole tribe to be put to the sword. He
then passed over to Mona (Anglesea), and reduced that island
entirely under the Roman power. As the time of the year was
now past for further military operations, and the slaughter of
the Ordovices had sti'uck terror through mo^3t of the other
tribes, Ag;ricola spent the winter in regulating* and reforming
the government of the province, and correcting the innmnerable
abuses which had crept into the administration. As the sum-
mer of the year 79 approached, the legions were again in
motion, and by a mixture of rigour towards those who resisted,
and extraordinary lenity towards those who submitted, he suc-
ceeded in establishing the lioman power throughout the island,
almost to the borders of Scotland. In the midst of these suc-
cesses, the emperor Vespasian died, and left the purple to his
son Titus. Agricola, who was continued in the government of
Britain, spent the remainder of the year in securing his con-
quests. He now, as Tacitus tells us, saAv the necessity of
weaning the tierce passions of the Britons from the unsettled
state of war and tumult to which they had become habit-
uated, and of leading them to adopt the pursuits of peace
and the refinements of civilisation. He saw that this could only
be effected by giving them a relish for the arts and a taste for
elegant pleasure. To this he excited them by his conversations
in private and by his public measures. He encouraged them to
erect temples, forums, and houses. He caused the sons of the
British chiefs to be instructed in the language and knowledge
of their conquerors. Such measures produced rapid effects.
The Britons soon began to adopt the Eoman dress, and they
exchanged the rude garb of their ancestors for the dignified
toga. The manners of the Romans also gradually took root
r among them, and they gained a taste for erecting porticos and
baths, and indulging in other luxuries.
In the spring of the year 80, Agricola placed himself again
at the head of the army, and, proceeding to invade and reduce
the lowlands of Scotland, extended the Roman territory as far
as the estuary of the river Taus (the Tay). When this cam-
])aign was over, the Roman troops Avcre employed under the
■J
CHAP. II.] THE GOVERXMEXT OF AGRICOLA. 59
eye of their leader in erecting" fortresses over the newly-acquired
territory, and the sites were chosen with so much judgment that
it was a common remark that no castellum huilt by Agricohi
was ever taken by the enemy, Avhile they were placed near y
enough together to communicate easily with each other.
Agricola's fourtli summer (a.d. 81) Avas employed in the
ei'ection of a chain of foils betw^een the two estuaries knoAvn to
the Romans by the name of Clota and Bodotria (the Clyde and
Forth), as a check upon the incursions of the northern high-
landers ; and in the following spring he brought his Heet into
tlie Solway Firth, and cai-ried liis troops over to the country
where it approached nearest to Ireland, Avhicli also he secured
with fortresses and troops. The exact locality of these opera-
tions has been a matter of some dispute, but the opinion whicii
seems to carry most weight places it in the country known in
more modern times by the name of Galloway. It was under- v
stood that the Eoman general already projected an invasion of
Ireland. One of its petty princes, driven into exile by a
domestic sedition, had repaired to Agricola to ask for •assist-
ance from the Eomans, and Agricola was ready to seize: the
occasion of carrying over a Eoman legion, had his intention not
been drawn away by other events.
Early in the year 83, which was Agricola's sixtli campaign,
the Eoman general marched with liis army into the country
beyond the line of fortresses erected two years before, to reduce
the nortliern tribes, who appear to have harassed his borders
by their inroads. Having assembled his iieet in the Firth of
Forth, he ordered it to accompany the march of his army, which
proceeded through the districts bordering on the eastern coast.
The Caledonian tribes harassed the Eoman legions on their
march ; and when they had reached a position supposed to be
a little to the south of the Ochil mountains, the ninth legion,
which Avas in advance and obliged to encamp in an unfavourable
position, was so vigorously attacked that, had it not been soon
relieved by the arrival of the rest of the Eoman forces, it might
liave experienced a disaster more serious even than that which
fell upon it in its march to Camulodunum. The object of this ^
campaign appears to have been to take possession of the districts
of Fife and Kinross, preparatory to the entire reduction of the
northern parts of the island in the following year. Accordingly
ill the summer of the year 84, having ordered his fleet to sail
nnind Scotland and alarm the enemy by making descents on the
coast, he advanced with the army, in which the southern
60 THE BRITONS. [chap. \u
]>ritons now served as Roman auxiliaries, and reached the foot
>^ of the Grampian mountains, on tlie declivity oi' which he found
thirty thousand of the bravest warriors of the north, under a
celebrated chief named Galg-acus, asseuibled to resist his further
advance. As the Romans advanced to the attack, they suffered
much from the arrows of the enemy, while the north Britons,
who were armed with long' pointless swords and small round
shields, used them so skilfully that they pari'ied off the Roman
missiles. Agricola, observing the inequality of this mode of
combating, chose three troops of Batavians and two of Tun-
grians, and ordered them to hurry forward and attack the Britons
with their swords. These were short and pointtd, and thci-e-
fore much better calcidated for close action than the long swords
of their opponents. The attack was made with courage and
\ success ; the Britons, crowded together too closely in their
* r?.nks, were deprived of the free use of their arms to strike with
their swords in their usual manner, while their faces and bodies
w^ere exposed to the deadly thrusts of their opponents, and
they soon began to give way. The rest of the Roman troops
had now come up, and the main body of the Caledonians,
which had remained in their position on the hill, rushed down
to the assistance of their companions, so that the battle became
general. The discipline of tiie Romans, however, soon overcame
the bravery of their opponents, and the noi'th l^ritons were
routed with terrible slaughter. About ten thousand are said to
have been killed, and those who escaped fled with their families
into the more remote and inaccessible parts of the country.
This last great battle of Agricola is believed to have been
fought on the moor of Ardoch, in Perthshire. It made the
Romans masters of the whole island. Agricola left his army
to winter in the district of the Horestii, and returned to his seat
of government in the south. His fleet made the cii'cuit of
North Britain, and, while they took a survey of its coasts and
obtained information relating to the interior, they flUed the in-
/ habitants with terror and alarm. They took possession of the
I Orkney Islands. The merits of Agricola were, however, too
V bright for the worthless ruler who then sat on the imperial
throne ; and this distinguished propraetor, with an empty
triumph, was deprived of his command in Britain, to experi
ence at home the ingratitude of Domitian. He left the pro-
vince of Britain in perfect tranquillity ; and, though history has
told us nothing; of the events of the next few vears, it seems
CI • '
probable that the Roman troops in Britain, flnding no employ-
CHAP. II.] AGEICOLA IN IRELAND. 61
nieiit at home, passed over to Ireland, and reduced that island
to nominal subjection. The poet Juvenal, who is said to have j ^
written his satire in a.d. 06, just twelve years after Ag-ricola's J /
last campai»'n, speaks of Irehmd as one of the most recent ac-
quisitions of the Roman arms —
' Anna quidem ultra
Litora Juvernre promovimus, et modo captas
Orcadas, ac minima contentos nocte Britannos.'
Britain was now entirely subjected to the power of imperial
Rome. Its people had irrecoverably lost their independence,
and they soon lost their nationality, Avhen their new rulers be-
«;• m to divide the province of liritain into departments. The
very nations, many of whom had so bravely foug'ht for their
freedom, lost their names, and gradually merged into Roman
subjects, or rather Roman slaves. A little more than thirty
years after the recall of Agricola, the celebrated geographer,
Claudius Ptolemseus, published his survey of the Avorld as then
known, in which he has given us a very exact survey of the
coasts of Britain and Ireland, with an enumeration of the native
tribes. From this account, compared with the allusions of
other writers, it appears that the south-eastern part of the island,
or the district now occupied by the county of Kent, was occupied
by the Cantii, a large and intiuential tribe, which, in CfBsar's
time, was divided ainono- four chiefs or kino-s. To the west,
the Regni hekl the modern counties of Sussex and Surrey, from
the sea-coast to the Thames. Still farther west, the Belgfe
occupied the country from the southern coast to the I»ristol
Channel, including nearly the whole of Hampshire, Willshire,
and Somersetshire. The whole of the extensive district e?.tend-
ing from the Belgse to the extreme western point of the inland,
then called Antivestseum or Bolerium (now the Land's End),
including Devonshire and Cornwall, was occupied by the Dum-
nonii, or Damnonii. On the coast, between the Dumnonii and
the Belgae, the smaller ti'ibe of the Durotriges held tlie modern
county of Dorset. On the other side of the Thames, extending
northwartls to the Stour, and including the greater part of
Middlesex, as Avell as Essex, lay the Trinobantes. To the
north of the Stour dwelt the Iceni, extending over the counties
of Suffolk, Norfolk, Cambridge, and Huntingdon. The Coritavi
possessed the present counties of Northampton, Leicester, Rut-
land, Derby, Nottingham, and Lincoln ; and the south-eastern
part of Yorkshire was held by the Parish Between the tribes
last enumerated, in the counties of Buckingham, Bedford, and
62 THE BRITOXS. [chap. ii.
Hertford, lay the tribe called by Ptolemy tlie Catyeuclilani
{KuTVEvx-'^nroi), and by others Catuvellani. Another name
apparently for tliis tribe, or for a division of it, was tlie Cassii.
West of these were tlie Attrebates, in Berkshire ; and still fur«
ther west were the Dobnni, in the connties of Oxford and
Gloucester. All these tribes are supposed to have been later
settlers than the tribes of the interior, those nearer the coast
being' always, of course, the more recent colonies, and it is far
from improbable that some of them were of German origin.
The interior of the island northward was occu])ied by the
Bi'igantes, who held the extensive districts, difficult of ap-
proach on account of their mountains and woods, extending
from the Humber and the Mersey to the present borders of
Scotland. This extensive tribe appears to have included several
smaller ones. Two of these are called by Riciiard of Ciren-
cester, the Yoluntii and the Sestuntii, the former in the west of
Lancashii'e, the latter in Westmoreland and Cumberland. The
Jugantes and the Cangi of Tacitus, on the borders of the Irisli
Sea, are also understood to have belonged to, or been dependent
upon, this tribe. The Brigantes are believed to have been the
original inhabitants of tlie island, who had been driven nortli-
I ward by successive invasions and settlements, and they appear
I to have been the least civilised tribe of South Britain ; their
wild independence w^as encouraged and protected by the nature
of the country they inhabited. Wales also was inhabited by a
primitive population. The northern counties, Flint, Denbigh,
Montgomery, Merioneth, and Caernarvon, with the island of
Angiesea (then, as we have said before, called Mona), was the
territory of the Ordovices. The south-eastern counties of Cor-
digan, Caermarthen, and Pembroke, were held by the Demetae.
The still more celebrated tribe of the Silures inhabited the
modern counties of Hereford, Kadnor, Brecknock, Monmouth,
and Glamoro-an. Between these and the Bri^'antes lav the
Cornabii, or Carnabii, who occupied the present counties of
Warwick, Worcester, Stafford, Salop, and Chester, and perhaps
the adjoining part of Flintshire.
The Avilder parts of the island of Britain, to the north of the
Brigantes, were inhabited by a great number of smaller tribes,
some of whom seem to have been raised in the scale of civibsa-
tion little above savao-es. Of these we have the names of no
less than twenty-one. Bordering on the Brigantes, were the
Otadeni, inhabiting the coast from the Tyne to the Firth of
Forth, including a large portion of Northumberland, with the
CHAP. II.] BRITISH TRIBES. f.Z
modern counties of Berwick and East-Lothian, and part of
Roxburg-lishire. Next to them were the Gadeni, occupying-
tlie western part of Northumberland, the small part of Cum-
berland north of tlie Irthin<>-, the western part of Roxburgh-
shire, tlie whole of the county of Selkirk, with Tweedale, a
great part of Mid-Lothian, and nearly all West-Lothian. The
Selgov3e inhabited Annandale, Nithsdale, and Eskdale, in Dum-
friesshire, with the east of Galloway. The Novantes inhabited
the remainder of Galloway. The Damnii, a larger tribe, held
the countiy from the chain of hills separating Galloway from
('arrick, northward to the river Ern. These tribes lay to the v
south of the Eorth and Clyde. Beyond the narrow boundary
formed by these rivers lay, first, the Horestii, who occupied the
modern counties of Clackmannan, Kinross, and Fife, with the
eastern part of Strathern, and the country to the west of the
Tay. The Venricones occupied a part of Perthshire, the whole
of Angus, and a large part of Kincardineshire. The northern
part of the Mearns, and the greater part of Aberdeenshire, were
inhabited by the Taixali. The Yacomagi possessed the country
forming the modern shires of Bantt", Elgin, and Nairn, with the
east part of Inverness and Brsemar, in Aberdeenshire. The
Albani held the districts of Braidalban and Athol, with parts of
Lochaber and Upper Lorn. The ferocious tribe of the Atta-
cotti inhabited part of Argyleshire, and the greater part of ^
Dumbartonshire. The wild forest country of the interior,
known as the Caledonia Si/lva (or forest of Celyddon), extend-
ing from the ridge of mountains between Inverness and Perth
northward to the forest of Balnagowan, including the middle
parts of Inverness and lloss, was held by the Caledonii, which
appears to have been at this time the most important and powei--
ful of all the tribes north of the Brigantes. The eastern part
of Ross was inhabited by the Cantae. On the south-eastern
coast of Sutherland were the Logi. Beyond them, the Carnabii
occupied the greater part of Caithness, leaving only the north-
west corner, which, with a part of Sutherlandshire, belonged to
the Catini. The interior of Sutherlandshire was peopled by the
jNIertse ; while the north and west coasts, and a small part of
the western coast of Ross, were inhabited by the Carnonacse. A
tribe named the Creones d\velt on the west coast of Ross ; the
Cerones held the western coast of Inverness and part of Argyle-
shire ; and the neck of land, now known by the name of Cantyre,
was the seat of the Epidii. We have no information on the
etlmological character of these tribes ; some of them are sup-
64 THE BRITONS. [ciiAr. n.
posed to have come from Scandinavia and the opposite coast of
^ Germanv ; others no doubt ori<>-inated in miy-rations from the
si south ; while others ai;"ain probably came from Ireland.
This island, known to the Homans by the names of Hibernia
and Jnverna, appears to have been tolerably well known in the
aji'e of Ptolemy, who <;ives ns a description of its coasts, and
enumerates the tribes and toAvns both iu the maritime districts
and in the interior. On the northern coast dwelt the Veiiiconii,
iu the modem county of Donegal, and the Robogdii, in London-
derry and Antrim, Adjoining to the Venicoiiii, westward, were
the Erdini or Erpeditani, and next to them the IMagnata:, all iu
Donegal. Farther south were the Auteri, in Sligo ; the Gan-
gani, in Mayo ; and the Velibori, or Ellebri, in the district
between Galway and the Shannon. The south-west part of the
island, with a great portion of the interior, was inhabited by the
Iverni, who gave name not only to the great river, but to the
whole island, and who may, perhaps, be considered as the
aboriginal inhabitants. The south-eastern promontory, now
called Carnsore Point, was then known by the title of the Holy
Promontory {Itpuv ak-pov), to the north-west of which, in the
modern counties of Waterford and Tippei'ary, Ptolemy places a
tribe called the Usdise or Vodire, according to the variations of
the manuscripts. In the modern comity of Wexford (hvelt the
I^rigantes ; and northward from them were the Coriondi, in
I Wicklow ; the Menapii, in Dublin ; the Canci, on the banks of
I the Boyne ; the Blanii, or Eblani, on the bay of Dundalk ; the
Voluntii, in Down ; and the Darini, borderhig on the Robogdii,
in Antrim.
Three, at least, of the tribes who held the eastern coast of
Ireland, the Brigantes, the Menapii, and the Voluntii, were, no
tloubt, colonies from the opposite shores of Britain. This cir-
cnmstance gives additional force to the conjecture that the
l^rigantes, with their dependent tribe, the Voluntii, are to be
considered as the remains of the earlier Celtic population of the
latter island. Driven inward by the later settlers, whether
Geltic or Teutonic, they were obliged also to seek new settle-
ments in the neighbouring island.*
It is evident that these various tribes, not only governed by
ditferent chiefs, but belonging to different races, must have
dilfered also in their manners and in their comparative civilis-
* It also p:ives rise to a supposition that the orio^inal Celtic lang-uas'e nf
Britain is represented rather by the modern Irish than by the Welsh,
which, for several other reasons, is more than probable.
CHAP. II.] THE BRITISH TOPULATIOXS. 6-5
ation, and that we should be Avrong in applying to them all
the various notices on this subject found in ancient writcn'S,
and much move so in transferring to the inhabitants of Britain,
without reserve, the description which the old geographers and
historians have left us of the people of Gaul. Most of the
descriptions found in subsequent writers are little more than a
repetition of the scanty information given by Caesar, who was
himself acquainted only with the south-eastern part of the
island.
We should probably form the best appreciation of the con-
dition of our Celtic forefathers before their conquest by the
Romans, if we compared them with the septs or clans in Ireland
and the highlands of Scollmd in the twelfth and thirteenth
centuries. Each chief exercised the same independent and
unrestrained authority over his clan, and the disunion of the
whole Avas probably increased by difference of language and
race. There seems to be no reason for assuming that the
different tribes were accustomed to unite under one head (or,
as he has been termed, Pendragon) in cases of emergency. On *~^
the contrary, we observe, as far as their history is known, that
they never acted together, unless Avhen their union was caused
by conquest, or by the alliance of one or two neighbouring and,
perhaps, kindred tribes.* The statement that they went naked,
and that they painted their bodies, can only have been true of
some of the more barbarous tribes. We have no very distinct
information on the costume of the Britons, except that we know
from the earlier Roman writers that they wore breeches {h'acccs),
like the Gauls and Germans. They are described as being in
person taller than the average height of the Romans. The
lu'ief account of Tacitus confirms the views already stated, as to
the difference of races which peopled the island. He imagined y/
that the red hair and masculine forms of the Caledonians be-
spoke a German origin ; that the Silures, by their complexions
{caloratl v/iltns), and curly hair, were a colony of the Iberi of
Spain ; and that the tribes who inhabited the coasts came from
Gaul ; and one of the arguments he adduces for believing that
the maritime tribes were of Gallic origin, the similarity of lan-
guage {sermo haudmnltum dlversus), leads us to believe that the
language of these tribes was totally different from that of the
* Tacitus, speaking of the British tribes, says, * Nee aliud adversus
validissiinas gentes pro nobis utilius, quam quod in commune non consu-
lunt. Rarus duabus tribusve civitatibus ad propulsandum commune
periculum conventus ; ita, dum singuli pug-nant, universi vincuntur.' —
Tacitus, Agric., c. 12.
P
-/^
66 THE BRITONS. [chap. it.
Silures, or from that of the Caledonians, and of the tribes of liie
interior.
In one particular, we are justified in considering the descrip-
tion of the manners of the people of Gaul as ap))licable to those
of Britain, I mean their religion. All the ancient writers agree
that the Druidic system was the same in both countries. Al
tliat we really know of it is given by Caesar, and may be best
repeated in his own words. ' The Druids,' he says, ' act in
all sacred matters ; they attend to the sacrifices, which are
offered either by the tribe in general, or by individuals, and
answer all questions concerning their religion. They always
liave a large number of young men as pupils, who treat
them with the greatest respect. For it is they who decide in
all controversies, Avhether public or private, and they judge all
causes, whether of murder, of a disputed inheritance, or of
the boundaries of estates. They assign both rewards and punisii-
nients, and whoever refuses to abide by their sentence, whether
he be in a public or private station, is forbidden to be present at
the sacrifices to the gods. This is in fact their most severe mode
of punishment, and those who have been thus excommunicated
are held as impious and profane ; all avoid them, no one will
cither meet them or speak to them, lest they shonld be injured
by their contagion ; every species of honour is withheld from
them, and if they are plaintiffs in a lawsuit, justice is denied
them. All the Druids are subject to one chief, who enjoys the
greatest autliority among them. Upon the death of the chief
Druid, the next in dignity is appointed to succeed him ; and if
there are two whose merits are equal, the election is made by
tlie votes of the whole body, though sometimes they dispute for
pre-eminence with the sword. . . , The Druidic system is thought
to have had its origin in Britain, from Avhence it was introduced
into Gaul ; and it is still customary for those who wish
;to study it more thoroughly, to pass over into Britain for that
purpose. The Druids enjoy peculiar privileges ; they are
exempted from service in war, and from the payment of taxes ;
they have also many other immunities, which cause their order
to become so munerous and influential, and young men are
gladly placed with them by their parents and relations to learn
tlieir doctrines. In their schools the pupils are said to learn by
heart a large number of verses, and in this way some of their
scholars pass twenty years in completing their education ; for
it is unlawful to commit their doctrines to writing, though they
are not ignorant of the art of writing ; and for all other pur-
CHAP. II.] CHARACTER OF THE DRUIDS. 67
poses, both in their public and private reckonings, tliey make
use of the Greek characters. It seems to me that they have
two motives for this conduct : in the first phice tliey are
uuwillino- that their tenets should become known to the vuk-ar ;
and, secondly, they are afraid that their pupils will be less apt
to cultivate their memories, if they trust to written characters,
which often have the effect of checking- diligent study. Among
their most important tenets is that of the immortality of the
soul, which they believe passes after deatli into other bodies ;
tliey hold this to be a great inducement to the practice of
virtue, as the mind becomes relieved from the fear of death.
Their other doctrines concern the motions of the heavenly
bodies, tlie magnitude of the earth and the universe, the nature
of tilings, and the power and attributes of the immortal gods.'
'AH the Gallic nations,' Caesar adds, 'are much given to
superstition ; for which reason, when they are seriously ill, or
are in danger through their wars or other causes, they either offer
up men as victims to the gods, or make a vow to sacrifice them-
selves. The ministers in these offerings are the Druids ; and
they hold that the wrath of the immortal gods can only be
appeased, and man's life be redeemed, by offering up human
sacrifice, and it is part of their national institutions to hold
fixed solemnities for this purpose. Some of them make
immense images of wicker-work, wdiich they fill with men who
are thus burned alive in offering to their deities. These victims
are generally selected from among those who have been con-
victed of theft, robbery, or other crimes, in whose punishment
they tliink the immortal gods take the greatest pleasin-e ; but
if there be a scarcity of such victims, they do not hesitate to
sacrifice innocent men in their place.'
'Their principal deity,' continues Caesar, 'is Mercury, in
whose honour they have erected numerous statues ; they hold
him to be the inventor of all tlie arts, and the god who protects
men on a journey, and leads them on their way ; moreover,
they ascribe to him the power of granting success and prosperity
in affairs of gain and commerce. Next to Mercury come
Apollo, Mars, Jupiter, and Minerva, to whom tliey ascribe
attributes similar to those which are attributed to the same
deities among other nations. Apollo is believed to heal diseases,
Minerva to initiate mankind in the arts and sciences, Jupiter
to be the king of heaven, and Mars to be the god of war. When
the Gauls are about to fight a battle, they often make a vow to
dedicate to Mars the spoils which they may take from thfir
%
)
-4.
68 THE BRITONS. [chap. ii.
enemies. If there be a superabundance of cattle taken in war,
the surplus is offered up in sacrifice. The rest of the spoil is
collected into one mass. In many of their tribes, large heaps
of these things may be seen in their consecrated places ; and it
is a rare occurrence for any individual sacrilegiously to conceal
part of the booty, or to turn it to his own use ; the severest
punishment, together with bodily torture, is inflicted on those
who are guilty of such an offence. The Gauls boast that they
sprung from father Dis (Pluto) ; and say that they derive their
information from the Druids. This is the reason why they
measure time by uights and not by days, and their birthdays,
together with the commencement of their months and years,
T are so arranged, that the days are reckoned as parts of the
preceding nights.'
Caesar had an interest in collecting all the information he
could relating to the Druids and their religion, but we are
almost led to suspect that he obtained it from different races,
German and Celtic, and that he mixed it together without due
discrimination. The five deities which he gives to the Gauls
seem to be Teutonic, the same whose names have been preserved
in our modern days of the week. The great god of the Ger-
mans was Woden, who is always identified with the Koman
Mercury ; Jupiter was Thor ; Mars was Tuisco ; Minerva was,
no doubt, Frigga ; and Caesar's Apollo was perhaps intended
for Saeter, the god whose name has been preserved in our
Saturday. It has always been the custom of the Germans to
reckon time by nights — we still say sennlgJd, fortuigJd, &c.,
for what the French call hnit jours, quinze jours, but we know
so little of the Celts, that we cannot venture to assert that they
did not reckon time in the same way.
An edict of the emperor Claudius proscribed the Druidic
caste, with its superstitions, and they quickly disappeared from
Gaul. A curious passage of Tacitus, where he compares the
tribes on the south and south-eastern coast of Britain with the
Gauls on the Continent, and points out as a point of similarity,
in which the other British tribes did not partake, the resem-
blance of their religious rites,* would lead us to imagine that
Druidism prevailed only among those maritime people. As the
* ' Proxinii Gallis, et similes sunt .... eorum sacra deprehendas, su-
perstitionum persuasione.' — Taciti Agric, c. 11. We must bear in n)ind
that Druidism was abolished when Tacitus wrote, so he could only speak
of the traces of it which remained among the people ; yet we know by many
instances how long such traces endure.
CHAP. II. J THE DRUIDS. 6S
Romans advanced, tlieir ban still fell upon the Druids, who
made their last stand in Mona, and were destroyed there by
the arms of Suetonius Paullinus. Subsequent winters only
speak of them as a race who belonged to past ages, and they
add nothing- to our knowledge, at least nothing in which we
can place any trust. It is Pliny who tells us of their respect
for the mistletoe. ' The Druids/ he says, ' who are the mngi
of Gaul, esteem nothing more sacred than the mistletoe, and
the tree on which it grows, if only it be an oak. Indeed they
select groves of oaks, and use their leaves in all their sacred
rites, so that their very name of Druids may seem to be derived
from the Greek name for oak (cpvt). Everything which grows
upon these trees is considered by them as sent from heaven,
and a sign that the tree is chosen by the deity himself. But
tlie mistletoe is very rare toftnd, and where it occurs is sought
with great avidity ; particularly on the sixth moon, which, a
a.iiong these nations, marks the beginnings of their months and »
years, and of a generation after thirty years, because it then
lias abundance of strength, though not yet half of its full size.
They call it in their language by a name which signifies all-
heal (omnia sauanteui), and when they have made ready their
sacrifices and banquets under the tree, they bring up two white
bulls, whose horns are then bound for the first time. A priest
clothed in a white robe ascends the tree, and with a golden
pruning-knife lops ott' the bough, which is caught in a white
towel. They then immolate the victims, praying that God
may prosper the gift to all who shall partake of it ; for they
believe that by using it as a drink barren animals are rendered
fruitful, and all kinds of poisons are deprived of their noxious
power,' *
* Plinii Hist. Nat., lib. xvi. c 9-5.
7i THE BRITONS, [chai'. hi.
I
CHAPTER III.
British Antiquities — Barrows — Cromlechs, and Sepulchral Chambers —
Circles ; Stoneheng-e — Other Monuments of Stone — Various descrip-
tions of British Barrows— Their contents— Pottery — Instruments of
Stone — Instruments of Metal — Other articles — Their value as illustra-
tive of History — The British Coinage — Earthworks, and supjjosed
sites of towns and villages.
Such is all we know from record of the history and condition
of tlie inhabitants of Britain before it Avas finally reduced to a
Koman province. We are able to add little to this knowledge
from tlie discoveries of the antiquary, for tlie monuments of
the Britisli period are few, and uncertain, on account of the
difficulty of appropriating- them in a satisfactory manner. It
has been the custom to consider all articles of rude make, which
appeared not to be Roman, as belonging to a period antecedent
to the Roman invasion ; but later experience, and more careful
investigation, liave sliown that this view was altogether erro-
neous. Much which used to be called British, is now known
to be Saxon, and it is impossible to say how much of the rest
belongs to the period of the Roman occupation, or to that which
immediately followTd it.
The only monuments to which people in a rude state of
civilisation seem to have been anxious to give durability, were
Iheir graves, and to the contents of these we must look for any
traces of the character and manners of those who built them.
From the remotest ages it was customary to mark to future
generations the last resting-place of the honoured dead, by
raising mounds, more or less elevated according to circumstances
connected with the locality, or according to the power and in-
fluence of the deceased. To these sepulchral mounds our
Anglo-Saxon forefathers gave the names of low (klcew), and
barrow {beorh, beanc) -, of which the former is chiefly preserved
CHAP. iii.J SEPULCIIRAJ. EAilKOWS. 7i
ill names of places, siicli as Bartlow, Houndslow, Ludlow, &c.,
while tlie latter lias been g-enerally used, by Eug-lisli writers on
archaeology as the technical term for all ancient sepulchral
mounds. Both are equivalent to the Latin tumulus. The form
of the barrow was in its original state more or less conical,
especially when it was of large dimensions, but ages of exposure
to the elements and to other actions, Avhich have swept so many
of them entirely from the soil, have no doubt greatly modified
the forms of those which are left, and, whatever may once have
been the distinction of form, we can now only judge of tlu;
people to whom they bexr.ged by th^ir contents. Sir Eichanl
Colt Hoare, an earnest and diligent antiquary, if not always a
correct one, opened a great number of barrows in the south of
England, and hastily undertook to classify them according to
their outward forms, inventing a nomenclature which has been
too blindly followed by antiquaries of later times. '^ He thus
not only distinguished by their outward forms what were British
barrows, but he subdivided the British barrows themselves. Yet
his own errors show how little truth there was in this system, for
he confounds British with Saxon, and sometimes either or both
with what may have been Koman.
It is only by pi'obability, greater or less, that we can attribute
any of these barrows to the British period, for unfortunately
we have no known and undoubted monuments of British manu-
factui'c with which to compare them, as is the case with the
Roman and with other later periods. The very fact that great
errors have been made, obliges us to proceed with the more
caution in forming our judgment.
There is one class of barrows, and those usually large ones,
which, when found in this island, antiquaries in general seem
to agree in ascribing to the Britons — mounds which contain a
rude chamber of rough stones, often of colossal dimensions. 1\\
the greater number of instances, the superincumbent mound
has been removed, either for the sake of the earth, or in the
belief, prevalent during the middle ages, that treasure Avas con-
tained under it, and the massive chamber of rough stones alone >.
has been left standing. Groups of large stones arranged in this I
.manner have been found scattered over various parts of the '
* The chief varieties in the cLissification alluded to, have received the
names of conical barrows, bell barrows, bowl barrows, Druid barrows, broad
barrows, twin barrows, long barrows, and pond barrows. No doubt
barrows with the forms indicated by these names are found, but it is most
probable that they frequently owe thon to accidental circumstances, among
which we must not omit the caprice of the makers.
72 THE DRITOXS. [c:iap. hi.
Rritisli islands, as well as in other countries. Our antiquaries
have applied to them the name of cromlechs, and have given to
tliem every sort of absurd explanation, the most general of
which was tliat which made them Druids' altars. But recent
researches have left no room for doubt tliat tiiey are all sepul-
chral chambers denuded of their mounds. In fact they liave
been found with tlieir original coverings iu the Cliannel Islands,
in Brittany, in Ireland, and in England. One instance occurred
about the year 1800, at Lanyou, in the parish of Maddern, or
Madron, near Penzance in Cornwall, which has been more care-
fully recorded than other similar discoveries in England, and it
furnishes us with an example of the motives which have led to
the removal of the original moimds. The farmer to whom the
ground belonged had often cast a longing eye to what appeared
to be an immense heap of rich monld, and at length he resolved
to clear it aAvay and spread it over his iield. As these large
barrows are generally raised in localities where the soil is not
very deep, tlie earth of which they are formed is the more
attractive. When they had carried away about a hundred cart
loads, the labourers came to a great stone, and not knoAving
what this might be, they removed the surrounding eartli more
carefully, and thus brought to light a large cromlech, formed,
like many known examples, by three upright stones, making
the three sides of the sepulchral chamber, covered with a mas-
sive cap-stone. Within were found a heap of broken urns and
human bones, but it was evident that it had been disturbed at
some former period, probably by treasure-seekers.
The word cromlech is said to be Celtic, and to have a mean-
ing not differing much from that of the name dolmen given to
them in France, which signifies a stone table.* Indeed, their
appearance in an uncovered state readily suggests the idea of
a table, and the peasantry in France often call them fairies'
tables and devils' tables. These chambers are usually closed
in only on three sides, and consist of four stones, three of which
raised on their ends form the sides of a square, while the fourth
serves as the covering. Such is the very reuiarkable cromlech
on the hill between Maidstone and Rochester, in Kent, known
by the name of Kits-Cotty House. In the annexed view of the
cromlech of Chun-Quoit, in the parish of Morvan, in the western
part of Cornwall, only the lower corner of tlie stone forming the
* Some of our Celtic antiquaries, not satisfied with the name of ' crom-
lech,' had named them kist-vaeiis, or, as they interpret it, 'stone-
chests.'
CHAP. HI.] THE CllUMLECII OF CIIUX-QUOIT.
73
transverse side is seen. Tliese monuments vary in size, though
iliey are often very large. The covering stone of the cromlech
Cromlech of Cliiln-Quoit in Cornwall.
of Chun, just described, is calculated to weigh about twenty
tons ; the covering stone of one at Lanyon, in the parish of
Madron, in Cornwall, weighs about fifteen tons ; that of Kits-
Cotty House, in Kent, has been estimated at ten tons and a y^
half. Others are much smaller. Three upright stones, with a
covering, constitute the cromlech in its simplest form. The
stones are usually joined as close together as their shape will
permit, for they seldom present any traces of having been
squared with a tool ; sometimes they are left with interstices
betAveen them, which give the chamber a still more rude appear-
ance ; and they are sometimes not arranged in a regular square
In some instances, as they now stand, the back stone has been
carried away, and the cromlech consists only of three stones,
two standing like the portals of a door, to support the trans-
verse cap-stone or lintel ; in others, where the cromlech has
fallen, only two stones are left, one upright, and the other lean-
ing upon it with on.' edge on the ground ; and in many instances
all that remains of the original cromlech is a single stone, stand-
ing upright or lying flat. We owe these forms doubtless to the
dilapidations of time, and examples are known of the destruc-
tion of whole cromlechs to break up the stones for roads, or
74 THE lUilTONS. [chap, hi
other purposes. But the ohl anticpiaries had mnde differeiil
classes of all these imperfect moniiiuents, and in France they
^•ave them distinctive names. They termed the first Uchavens,
which is intei-pi'eted also as meaning- stone-tables, but later
French antiquaries have given them the Greek name of triliths,
on account of the three stones of which they are composed ; the
second are called by the French antiquaries de mi-dolmens ; and
the third class they have termed indiscriminately menhirs, or
peulvans, Celtic terms signifying- long stones, or stone pillars.
This, as I have said, was the simplest form of the Britisli
sepulchral chamber, but it was sometimes much more compli-
cated in its structure. In some instances it presents the foi'm
of a ponderous cap-stone, supported at its corners by four
stones, and leaving the sides of the chamber more or less open.
In other instances the chamber is made more complete, its
sides being- formed by a number of stones joined side by side,
with one or more very large cap-stones above. Crondechs thus
constructed are found in different parts of England, and
especially in the Channel Islands. Sometimes more than one
crondech is found under the same mound. On the hills between
Gloucester and Clieltenham, a rather low% but very extensive
oljlong mound, overgrown with tir-trees, w'as a few years ago
accidentally dug into at one end, and a small crondech was
brouglit to light. From the appearance of the mound, we are
justified in supposing- that one or more similar cromlechs still
remain uncovered in the part which has not been touched.
There is a remarkable monument of this kind at Plas Newydd,
in the Isle of Anglesea ; it consists of two cromlechs close
togetlier (the French antiquaries call it a double dolmen), one
considerably larger than the other.* The cap-stone of the
largest, which measures about twelve feet in length by ten in
l)readth, and from four and a half to three and a half feet in
thickness, rests on five ujDright stones ; it is said to have had
originally seven supports. These two cromlechs were no doubt
included in one mound.
A glance at the monument last described shows us how
readily the idea wouhl present itself of building-galleries, or a
series of chambers, in these large sepulchral mounds, probably
to serve as family tombs. Vast works of this kind are found
* It may be mentioned, as a sample of the absurdities which have been
published on the subject of these monuments, that a writer of the earlier
part of the present century, describing this monument, ' had no doubt '
that the greater cromlech was appropriated to the sacrifice, and the lesser
to the priest while he attended it I
CHAP. i:r. ]
CROMLECH AT PLAS NEWYDD.
in l^rittaiiy, as well as in Ireland. Tlie chambered monument
of New Grange, in Meatli, in the latter country, is celebrated V
Cromlech at Plas Newydd, Isle of Ang-lesen.
amonj? Celtic antiquaries ; it contains a chamber twenty feet
hig'h by thirty feet in circumference, approached by a narrow
passage from the side of the mound, the entrance to which was
(^losed by a large slab of stone. The researches of Air Lukis
among the Celtic sepnlchres of the Cliannel Islands, show that
these stone chambers had been there used by generation after
generation through many ages. As far as antiquarian re-
searches have yet been carried, extensive moiumients of this
kind are of rare occurrence in England. They are found,
however, in Wiltshire. When denuded of their covering of
earth, they have been more easily thrown down than the
simple cromlech, or perhaps they have afforded greater tempta-
tion to those who -va ere in want of stone for other purposes.
The monument at Ashbury, in Ikrksliire, to -which the Saxons
attached the name of TFelaudes Smiththan (Weland's Smithy —
Weland was the Saxon Vulcan), a name which has been
corrupted to that of Wayland Smith's cave, appears to haVe
been originally a gallery with chambers of this description. A
very curious monument of the same kind, nearWellow, in Som-
cn-setshire, was opened by Sir Eichard Colt Hoare, in the May
of 1S16, and an account of it published in the nineteentli vol*
76
THE BRITONS.
[CUAP. UT.
ume of the Archaeolog-ia. The barrow, composed of stones
instead of earth, and of a very irremdar form, stood on the side
of a sloping- field called Eonnd Hill Tyning, at a place called
Stoney Littleton, about three quarters of a mile west of Wellow
church. The barrow was a hundred and seven feet long, fifty-
four feet in its extreme width, and thirteen feet higli in its
most elevated part. When opened it was found to contain a
long gallery with chambers on each side. The annexed cut
represents a section of the barrow in the length of the gallery,
Barrow at Stoney Littleton, in Somerset,
and a plan. The entrance was on the north-west side, where a
stone upwards of seven feet long, and three and a half wide,
supported by two others, left a square aperture of about four
feet high, which had been closed by another large stone. This
entrance led to a long passage or avenue, extending in the
direction from north-west to south-east forty-seven feet six
inches, and varying in breadth. There were three transepts,
or recesses, on each side. The side-walls were formed of thin
laminee of stone piled closely together without cement, and a
rude kind of arched roof, made by stones so placed as to over-
lap each other. Where the large stones in the side walls did
not join, the interstices were filled up with layers of small ones.
This, like so many of the larger barrows, had been disturbed,
and the deposits removed or scattered about. In one of the
CHAP, iir.j MATERIALS OF THE MOUNDS. 77
recesses, fragments of an earthen vessel with burnt bones were
found ; but in general the deposits had been taken out of the
recesses and scattered over the avenue, which Avas strcAved with
fragments of bones, mostly imburnt. In oue place, just before
the second transept, a stone had been placed across the avenue,
which closed the access to the further part, but with what
object it is not easy to guess.
The mound or barrow, which, as we have stated, originally
covered these cromlechs and stone structures, Avas generally
formed of fine mould, and the value of the earth as soil has
doubtless been the principal cause of their removal. Sometimes,
liOAvever, the mouud is composed of small loose stones, or of
stones and earth mixed. That at Stoney Littleton, in Somer-
setshire, appears to have been peculiar in its construction, hmlt,
as it were, of small stones. The reason of the use of stones y
instead of earth may generally be traced to the natural character
of the locality, as such barrows are found most frequently on
spots were stone was much more easily obtained than earth.
A few instances have occurred in Wiltshire, but they are
seldom found iu the interior or in the south of England, except
in Cornwall, where they are not uncommon. Tliey are common
in Wales, and are found also in the north of England. In
Scotland, where they are known by the name of cairns, they
abound. The Welsh call them carmjdd. In Erance they call
the mounds of stones galgals.
The base of the larger sepulchral mounds, and very often of
the smaller ones, was usually defined either by a shallow fosse,
or by a circle of stones, and sometimes the two were combined.
In some instances, especially in Cornwall, instead of the circle
of stones, the base of the barrow was supported by a sort of
low wall. These circles have often disappeared with the
mound, as the stones of which they were composed were
smaller and more portable than those which constituted the
cromlecli. But they as often remain encircling the cromlech.
At Molfra, in Cornwall, on a bare hill with a commanding-
view of Mount's Bay, a fine crondech is surrounded by a
circular base of stonework, thirty-seven feet in diameter, and
two feet high. A cromlech at Zennor, or Sennor, in Cornwall,
is surrounded by a similar base. Our cut of the cromlech at
Chun shows the circle of stones round that monument. The
circles of stones are frequently fomid with the cromlechs in
various parts of England. They are also often found without
any cromlech in the centre. One of these, called Dance Maine,
THE BRITONS.
[CHAP. III.
at Bolleit, in the parish of St Biirian, near the Land's End, is
represented in the accompanying sketcli. This circle is abont
eighty feet in diameter. There are several other good examples
in Cornwall, nearly of the same magnitude, such as the circle at
Boscawen-un, in tlie parish cf Sancrcd, near the Land's End,
Circle called Dance Maine, near the Land's End, Cornwall.
about the same size as that of Dance Maine; one in the parisli
of Madron, seventy feet in diameter; and two adjoining circles
in St Just, each between sixty and seventy feet in diameter.
The last stands on an eminence commanding a view of the
Scilly Islands. There is a similar circle on the summit of the
lofty Pen-maen-mawr, in North Wales. There are remains of
J. others at Salkeld, near Carlisle, at Rollrich, near Banbury in
V Oxfordshire, and in several other places in England. One,,
called Arbor-low, in the Peak of Derby, nearly one hundred and
tifty feet in diameter, is surrounded by a deep intrenchment.
Sometimes the stones forming the circle are nearly equal in
size, while in other cases they are very irregular. The latter
is especially the case in a circle near Winterb urn in Dorsetshire.
It does not necessarily follow that the mounds raised on all
these circles contained each a cromlech — the interments may, in
some cases, have been made without a cham1)er, as it has been
found to be the case in some larger barrow^s.
Antiquaries observed these circles before they noticed liow
CHAP. III.] STONEHEXGE. . 7^
often they accompanied cromlechs, or were aware that cromlechs
are sepulchral mon\unents, and they g'ave them the name of
J)rnld>i' circles, imagMned that they were temples, or courts of
justice, or places of assembly, and even built extravagant
speculations on the mimber of stones which formed each circle.
It is now quite certain that the majority of such circles were
originally made to support or inclose sepulchral mounds, and
even the circle at Arbor-low, which has been set down so
positively as being the great Druidical temple of the Peak of
Derby, would seem, by its name of low, to have had another
Dbject, and when that name was given, to have presented a
different ap])earance. Yet we should be rash in asserting, Aviih
our scanty knowledge of the subject, that some few of the
circles of stones still remaining on our own soil may not have
been erected for other purposes, though it is difficult to make
the distinction. The greater number of these circles are not
larger than the basis of ordinary large barrows, and there are
sepulchral mounds known, whose bases are ecpial to the largest ;
yet I am not aAvare that any barrow so large has yet been
discovered in this country resting on such a cii'cle of stones.
Moreover, as we pursue these circles thi'ough the ascending ,.
scale of magnitude, we become still more embarrassed when we i
reach the gigantic monuments of Avebury and Stonehenge.
The extraordinary monument called Stonehenge, an Anglo-
Saxon term meaning the hanging stones, is situated on a gentle
knoll in the midst of a wide and barren tract, only distinguished
iVom a plain by not very considerable elevations. It consisted
originally of an outer circle of thirty upright stones, sustaining
as many others placed horizontally, so as to form a continuous
impost. These upright stones were about fourteen feet high
above the ground, and seven feet broad, by three in thickness.
They differ from other Celtic stone monuments in the circum-
stance that the stones have been hewn and squared with tools,
and that each of the upright stones had two tenons or projections . /
on the top, Avhicli fitted into mortices or hollows in the super-
incundjent slabs. Within this first circle, which was about a
hundred feet in diameter, was another circle, eighty-three feel
in diameter, containing about the same number of perpendicular
stones, but much smaller, and without imposts. This again
inclosed two elliptical arrangements of large and small stones,
the former arranged in what the French archaeologists term
trilitiis, or groups of three stones, two upright ones and an
impost, and the other formed by a series of small upright
80 THE BRITOXS. [chap. tii.
stones, three of wliicli stood before eaeh trilitli. The triliths,
were from sixteen to twenty *one feet in heig-ht. In tlie central
space, in front of the principal trilith, is a large flat stone,
which those who look upon the whole as a primeval temple,
call the altar. Such is the arrangement of this monument as
nearly as we can judge from its present condition, Avhich pre-
sents to the eye at first sight an apparently confused mass of
upright and fallen stones, the appearance of which, as seen from
the W.N.W., is exhibited in our engraving, taken from a
sketch by Mr Fairholt. The form of the tenon on the
uprights of the outer circle is shown on the leaning stone in
front, somewhat more prominently than it is really seen, in
order to make it more intelligible to the reader. This structure
of stones occupies the centre of an area, inclosed by a circular
intrenclunent, consisting of a ditch and bank, three hundred
feet in diameter. It was approached by a wide intrenched
avenue from the north-east, which, at the distance of a few
hundred feet, branched off in two ways, running north and
east.
The ground around Stonehenge is covered with barrows, and
was evidently the cemetery of a very extensive tribe, but
nothing has yet been discovered to throAv any light upon the
object or date of the structure itself. The earliest existing
legends relating to it descrilje it as a monument raised to the
memory of the dead ; a notion which may easily have arisen
from the number of sepulchral monuments surrounding it.*
The earliest writer who mentions it, Henry of Huntingdon,!
looked upon it as involved in the same impenetrable mystery
which still envelopes it, and which will probably never be
cleared. From the aiTangement of the stones, the most pro-
bable conjecture seems to be that whicii makes it a temple for
some kind of Avorship ; but the wild specidations to which this
and other suppositions have g'iven rise should be deprecated by
* Geoffrey of Monmouth, and the host of writers who translated and
paraphrased his fabulous History of the Britons, pretended that these
stones were brought from Ireland, and that they were raised to the me-
mory of the British princes fabled to have been murdered by Hengist and
his Saxons.
t In the list of the wonders of Britain, written in the earlier half of the
twelfth century, and given by Henry of Huntingdon, Stonehenge is the
second wonder. ' Apud Stanhenges lapides mirte magnitudinis in niodum
portarum elevati sunt, ut portse portis superpositse videantur, nee potest
excogitare qua arte elevati sunt, vel qualiter constructi.' — 'At Stanhenges
stones of wonderful magnitude are raised in the manner of doors, so that
they seem like doors placed over doors, nor can any one imagine by what
art they were raised, or how constructed.'
CHAP. III.] CIRCLES AT AVEBURY. «2
all who are sincerely desirous of arriviii£>: at truth.* It has
been observed with reg'ard to the stones of wliich this inoiin-
ment is constructed, that the outer circles of larg'e stones, as
well as the inner triliths, are of the sandstone found plentifully
in the neighbourhood, whereas the inner circle of small stones,
as well as the small stones within the triliths, are of a diHerent
sort of stoue, which appears to have been brought from Devon-
shire. This litis led to a conjecture that Stonehenge was built ^
at two different periods, but those who have adopted this
opinion differ as to which was the earliest and which the lai^st
part.
A series of circles more reniai'lvable even tlian those of
Stonehenge, is found at the village of Aveburv, distant from
IStonehenge about twenty miles. It consisted originally of an
area, about fourteen hundred feet in diameter, inclosed by a
deep ditch and bank, immediately within which was a Hrst
circle of a hiuidred stones. Within the area were two double
circles, which have been designated as temples, one having
three stones in the centre, and the other one only. The stones
with which these various circles were composed, Avere no less
massive than those at Stonehenge, varying from five to twenty
feet in height. Two entrances were approached by two Avinding
avenues, each consisting of a double row of upright stones,
branching off to the extent of about a mile and a half to the
West and south. These avenues of approach, from their form,
have been a fertile subject of specidation, and have been
imagined to have some connection with the worship of the
serpent. At no great distance from the outer circle of iVvebury
is a fine cromlech Avith its attendant circle of stones. The
I'emains at Avebuiy are much less known than those of Stone-
iienge ; and they are not easily observed, on account of the
extent of grouud they cover, and its subdivision by hedges and
other inclosures. The space inclosed by the earthen embank-
ment contains a village, with various fields and buildings,
over which the stones that remain are scattered in apparent
confusion.
Stones which have been classed by our anti(piaries under the
indiscriininate title of Druidic, but Avhich come under the head
^' The young antiquary is particularly to be warned against such specu-
lations as have recently been publi.shed in a book entitled ' The Druidical
Temples of the County of Wilts,' by the Rev. E. Duke, as more calculated
to throw ridicule upon s.-ieiice than to promote it. Very good accounts of
those monuments are given by Mr Britton, in his articles on Stonehenge
und Aveburv in the ' 1 enny Cyclupa-dia.'
vi
84 THE BRTTOXS. [chap. hi.
of none of the monuments already described, are found in
groups, or sing-ly scattered, over many parts of our island. Some
of these appear to be natural formations, others have been set
up at different periods for various purposes, and others are pro-
bably the remains of cromlechs and circles. Geologists and
antiquaries seem now generally agreed that the rocking-stones
are not works of art, but that they are the result of natural
causes, and that they have been classed erroneously among
Druid ic remains. In the neighbourhood of Boroughbridge, iu
Yorkshire, there are masses of scattered rocks Avhicli in the same
manner have been erroneously supposed to be Druidical. In
some cases a few scattered stones are the remains of circles or
avenues. Single stones belonging to a long avenue of this kind
are still traced here and there in a line from the foot of the hill
on which Kits-Cotty House stands, across the valley to the
opposite chalk-hills, a distance of five miles. Celtic antiquaries
have given to these single stones the names of peulvan [i. e.
stone pillar), and menhir (long stone). They have no doubt
been erected at different periods, and for different purposes.
Some, as I have just observed, are the last remains of cromlechs.
Others are sepulchral monuments, often of tlie Roman or post-
Roman period, which is proved sometimes by inscriptions.
Several such inscribed stones have been found in Wales and
Cornwall ; and there is a celebrated one near Joinville, in
France, witli the inscription in Roman characters, viuomarvs
ISTATILI F (Viromarus the son of Istatilius). Two, found in
the neighbourhood of Neath, in Glamorganshire (the Roman
Nidum), have severally the inscriptions imp. c. fla. val.
MAXIMINO INVICTO AUGUS [TO], and IMP. M. C. PIAVONIO
viCTORiNO AUGUSTO, aud Were perhaps boundary-stones or
mile-stones. There is a rougli uninscribed stone of this descrip-
tion, perhaps a boundary-stone, standing on the common at
Harrowgate, in Yorkshire, concerning whicli the inhabitants
can only tell you, that ' the oldest man that ever lived there
knows nothing about it.' A single stone, or peulvan, in the
department of the Haute-Marne in Prance, is said to bear a
Latin inscription, stating that it marked the ancient limits of
the Leuci. That such stones marked the sites of battles, or
were memorials of celebrated events, is a mere assumption. Al-
thou"-h the stones of the so-called Druidic monuments are in
general rough and untouched with a tool, some instances are
known, as in the extraordinary sepulture of Gavr'inis in the
Morbihan (Brittany), and at New Grange, in Ireland, where they
CHAP. III.] SUPERSTITIOUS LEGENDS. 8/i
liave been sculptured with rude ornaments. In some instances /
in En<2^1and, one of the stones of a cromlech is pierced with a V
round hole, perhaps accidental, or the result of caprice.
Long after the people who raised them had passed away, and
Avhen tlieir meaning, and the object for which they were erected,
were alike forgotten, these monuments of stone continued to
be regarded by the peasantry with reverence, which, combined
with a certain degree of mysterious fear, degenerated into a
sort of superstitious worship. In this feeling originated legends
connected with them, and the popular names which are often
found attached to them. Stonehenge was called the Giants'
Dance {chorea glgantum), a name no doubt once connected with
a legend which has been superseded by the story attached to it
by Geoffrey of Monmouth. A circle in Cornwall, of which we
have given a sketch on a former page, is called Dance Maine,
or the dance of stones, and is said to be the representation of a
party of young damsels who were turned into stones because
they danced on the Sabbath Day. According to a somewhat
similar legend, a party of soldiers, who came to destroy Long
Compton, were changed into the Bollrich stones in Oxfordshire.
The people of Brittany declare that the extraordinary multitude
of stones arranged upright in lines at Carnac, was an army of
pagans changed into stones by St Cornilly. As we have seen,
the Saxons believed that a cromlech in Berkshire was a work-
shop of their mythic smith Weland. A cromlech on Marlborough
Downs is called the Devil's Den. Legends like these, which \/^
are found in every part of our island, are generally good evidence
of the great antiquity of the monmnents to which they relate.
In Prance, as in England, and indeed in most countries, they
are usually connected in the popular belief with fairies or with
demons — and in England often with Robin Hood. In France
this latter personage is replaced by Gargantua, a name made
generally celebrated by the extraordinary romance of Rabelais.
A cromlech near the village of Toury, in Brittany, is called Gar-
gantua's stone ; a not uncommon name for the single stone or
menhir is paid de Gargantua (Gargantua's quoit). A very
common name for cromlechs among the peasantry of France is
fairies' tables, or devils' tables, and in one or two instances they
have obtained the name of Caesar's table ; the covered alleys, or
more complicated cromlechs, are similarly named fairies' grottos,
or fairy rocks. The single stones are sometimes called fairies'
or devils' seats. The prohibition to worship stones occurring
so frequently in the earlier Christian ecclesiastical laws and
8G TEIE BRITONS. [chap, iir
oivlinances, relates no doubt to tliese Druidical inoininieiits, and
was often the cause of their desti'uction. Traces of tliis Avorsliip
still remain. In some instances people passed tliroug'h the
Druidical monuments for trial, or for purification, or as a mode
of defensive charm. It is still a practice among the peasantry
at Columbiers, in France, for YOung girls Avho want husbands,
to climb upon the cromlech called the Pierre levee, place there
a piece of money, and then jump down. At Guerande, with the
same object, they depose in the crevices of a Celtic monument
bits of rose-coloured wool tied with tinsel. The women of
Croisic dance round a menhir. It is the popular belief in
Anjou, that the fairies, as they descended the mountains, spin-
ning by the way, brought down the Druidical stones in their
aprons, and placed them as they are now found.
In a great number of cases, the British cromlechs, like the
barrows of other periods, are placed on lofty hills, commanding-
extensive views of the sea, if on the coast, or, Avhen inland, of
the surrounding country. It seems always to have been the
desire of the chiefs to be buried in such commanding positions.
A cromlech at Molfra, in Cornwall, is thus situated on a bare
hill, which commands a wide range of view over Mount's Bay.
The mound of some Celtic chief has once been raised on the
elevated summit of Pen-maen-mawr, in Wales, of which the
circle of stones that confined its base alone remains at the present
day. It would be difficult to select in this respect a finer position
than that occupied by Kits-Cotty House, in Kent, of which a
slight sketch is given in the cut in the next page. This large
cromlech stands on the summit of a lofty knoll, a little in
advance of tlie chalk-hill which rises behind. Below, the Med-
way Avinds in iN course from Maidstone to Rochester. Further
on extends a Avide valley, bounded on the north by another range
of chalk-hills. Under these latter hills, at the spot indicated in
the cut by three crows, lies the parish of Addington, in which
are several circles, cromlechs, and other early sepulchral monu-
ments ; and from this spot, proceeding in a direct line eastAvard,
large upright stones are found at intervals, Avhich seem to have
belonged to an avenue extending from the group of monuments
at Addington to the foot of the hill on which Kits-Cotty House
stands, a distance of not less than five miles. The hill behind
Kits-Cotty House is also covered Avith sepulchral monuments,
consisting of smaller cromlechs and circles, either throAvn down
or partly buried ; and there are several remarkable cromlechs
and circles in the fields below ; all seeming to indicate that this
CFIAP. III.]
KITS-COTTY HOUSE.
valle}^ was the Imrial-place of a British tribe. Another class of
UioriUinents are found on the liill above Kits-Cotty House.
Kils-Colly ILiuPO, in Kent, from llic hill above.
Lnrg-e stones, resenibliii<2^ the nienliirs, are found lying* flat on
the oTound, and, on excavating, it is discovei-ed that they are
])laced over round pits cut in the chalk, and filled np with Hints.
None of these have yet been carefully investigated, but, on the
opposite hills, and in other parts in the neighbourhood, are
found similar pits open, communicating with chambers cut in
the chalk, regarding the purpose of which many conjectures have
been hazarded, but it is not improbable that they were sepulchral.
Very few of the cromlechs and stone chambers in Britain
had been uncovered from their mounds of earth in recent
times, under proper examination. This deficiency has been
compensated, in some measure, by the extensive and carefid
researches among the cromlechs of the Channel Islands, by
Mr Lukis,* although there would, no doubt, be found a marked
difference between their contents, which belonged to Gaul, and
those of the British monuments of a similar character. But
there is another numerous class of barrows, which are generally
* iSIr Lukis's diflferent accounts of his researches in the Channel Islands
will be found in the first volume of the ' Archa;oU)gical Journal,' pp. 14'2,
'222; and in the 'Journal of the Archaeological Association,' vcl. i. i'l-.
2o, 306, 311 ; vol. iii. pp. 4, 269, 342 ; vol. iv. p. 323.
/
88 THE BRITONS. [chap. hi.
considered to be British, but vvnicli do not contain the se-
pulcliral chamber or cromlech. Numerous examj)les of this
class of barrows have been opened in AViltshire, Dorsetshire,
and Derbyshire, and a few in other parts.* These are the
oidy barrows in this conntiy which have furnished us, to any
extent, witli articles which, from a chain of indirect evidence,
are believed to be British. These barrows differ very much
in form and size. The interment is sometimes placed on the
level of the ground, and sometimes in a shallow grave dug
below the surface, with variations in the manner of burial
which can only have arisen from individual caprice. The
body is sometimes found to have been buried entire, wliile,
perhaps, in a majority of cases, it had been burnt, and the
ashes deposited in rude urns. When the body Avas interred
without cremation or burning, it was sometimes stretched at
full length, and at others doubled up and laid on one side,
or was sometimes phiced in a sitting position. The urns con-
taining the burnt bones are sometimes found in their natiu'al
position, and sometimes inverted, with the mouth downwards.
When upwards, the urn is often covered Avith a flat stone.
There is no evidence to support the conjectures of some
writers, that these different modes of burial belong to different
dates ; it seems more probable that they were fashions adopted
by different families, or by subdivisions of tribes or septs, but
it would be a vain speculation to attempt to give a decided
opinion on such questions, Avith the little we know of the
manners and history of the ancient iidiabitants of this island.
It is certain, however, that all these different modes of inter-
ment are often found in the same barrow, for some of the
barrows seem to have been family graves, and it is rare to find
only one interment, Avhile tlie larger barroAVs contain usually a
considerable number of urns and bodies. In many cases these
are distinguishable into primary and secondary interments, and
so on, and in opening these barrows the excavator is never sure
in Avhat part of the mound he will find a deposit. A very large
* Numerous barrows in Wiltshire were opened by Mr W. Cunnington
und Sir Richard Colt Hoare, the latter of whom has given copious de.scrip-
tions of them in his ' Ancient Wiltshire ; ' those of Derbyshire have been
largely examined by Mr Thomas Bateman, and described in a very useful
volume, the ' Vestiges of the Antiquities of Derbyshire.' Some of the
British barrows in eastern Yorkshire have been opened by Lord Londes-
borough ; many of those of Dorsetshire were opened by the late Mr Syden-
ham, by Mr Warne, Mr C. Hall, and other local antiquaries, whose reports
of their discoveries are found scattered over volumes of the ' Archjeolo^ia,'
and of the ' Journal of the Archaeological Association.'
CHAP. III.] TUMULUS AT ST WE^XAUD'S. 89
barrow near Dorchester, Avas found to co'.isist of a low primary
barrow, on which subsequently a secou 1 iiiteriuent had been
placed, and then a new mound raised over it. ISometimes the
different interments are arrano-ed in regular order. In the
Deverill barrow, between Whitechurcli and Milbourne St
Andrew, in Dorsetshire, opened in 1825, and described in a
little volume by W. Augustus Miles, the urns were found ar-
ranged in a circle under protecting stones. Throughout these
early barrows we find much irregularity, and evidently a good
deal of caprice in the mode of burial.
Some few years ago I nad the direction of the opening of a
lartre tumulus at St Weonard's in Herefordshire. This was a
large barrow, its diameter at the base being, as near as I could
roughly measure and calculate it, about a luuidred and thirty
feet, and its elevation from the ground somewhat more than
twenty. The summit forms a circular platform, about seventy-
six feet in diameter, levelled in such a manner that my first
impression was that tlie tumulus had been truncated. The
edge of this platform is planted with large fir and other trees,
among which is a decayed yew tree, of great antiquity, and a
tall poplar stood exactly in the centre. It appears that, until
a recent period, the platform on this mound Avas the usual
scene of village-fetes, and that it was the spot especially chosen
for morris-dancing, a custom very prevalent in Herefordshire,
and that the poplar tree in the middle was used as the village
maypole. Placed on a bold isohnted eminence in the middle of
ihe village, the height of the mound gives to its summit a won-
derfully extensive prospect around. In the popular belief these
mounds Avere generally looked upon as sepulchral, and this at St
AVeornard's was believed by some to have been the grave of the
hermit so named, from Avliom the neighbouring church had
taken its name, and by others that of some great chieftain .
The appearance of this tumulus at the time it was excavated is
shown in the accompanying cut. The men began their work
on the south-eastern side, Avith a cutting from eight to nine feet
wide, in a direct line toAvards the north-west.
I have described the process of opening this fine tumulus in
the first volume of my Essays on Archaeological Subjects,* from
Avhich I extract the foUoAving. ' At about six feet above the
level of the base of the tumulus there Avas an evident difference
* ' Essays on Arclia?olo<iical Subjects and on various questions connected
with the History of Art, Sciouce, and Literature, iu tlie Middle Ages,' vol.
i. p. 62.
90
TUE BRITONS.
[chap. m.
in the character of the soil, and the appearances were stronj^ly
in favour of the belief that this Mas the oriiiinal snrface of the
Sopulcliral Tunmhis at Si Wconard's, Iloiofoidsliire.
i^ronnd, wliich must in tliat case have been very uneven. Actinuj
on this belief, we took this as the level of our cutting, which
was exactly fourteen feet deep from the top of the mound. On
a Thursday alternoon, when the workmen had amved within
about fifteen feet from the centre of the mound, th(;y came upon
what appeared to be the base of a heap of large flat stones
(the sandstone of the spot, which breaks up into this form),
rudely built up one over the other, and so completely free of
earth within that we could thrust our arms in between them.
My tirst impression was that we had come upon a cairn, and I
thought it advisable to clear away the earth from above, before
removing the stones. This operation occupied the wdiole of
the day on Friday. We found that, instead of being the l)ase
of a large cairn, the stones formed a small mound, and then
sunk again ; but we found also a layer of these large stones
along the level of our cutting, until near the centre they began
to rise again, and evidently reached a somewhat greater eleva-
tion than before. It was now thought advisable to carry the
cutting to a little distance beyond the centre, and tlie poplar
tree was sacrificed. It was not till Saturday night that this
operation was nearly completed, leaving uncovered a great part
of the heap of stones in the centre, which presented the appear-
CHAP. HI.] TUMIJJ.US AT ST WEONARD'S. 91
aiice of the exterior of a rude vault. On jMoiulay, tin IGth
[of April], the stones iu tlie centre were cleared away, and
within them appeared a inttss of much finer mould than the rest
of the mouhl. This mould also was cleared away to the level
of the cuttino- ; but as yet no indications of a sepulchral inter-
ment presented themselves, although the workmen were still of
opinion that they Avere on the orif>"inal hard surface of tlu;
ground. JUit of the accuracy of this opinion I now became
very doubtful, and on the following- morning I directed the
men to sink a pit on the spot which had been covered by the
vaidt of stones. They had not proceeded far before they canu'
to a mass of ashes, mixed with pieces of charcoal and fragments of
burnt human bones, which was found to be about a foot and a half ^
thick, and was apparently about nine or ten feet in diameter. A.
piece of thigh bone, part of the bone of the pelvis, and a fragment
of the shoulder-blade, were picked up here ; and it appeared evi-
dent that the Avhole of the ashes of the funeral pile had l)een
placed on the ground at this spot, and that a small mound of
fine earth had been raised over them, upon which had been
built a rude roof or vault of large rough stones. No traces of
urns, or of any other manufactured article, were met with.
Having been thus successful in discovering the central deposit,
our attention was now turned to the first mound of stones, and
it was determined to clear those away and dig below our level
there also ; and the result Avas the discovery of another inter-
ment of ashes, also mixed with human bones in a half-burnt
state. This last operation was performed on the mor^iing of
Wednesday, the 18th of April ; after which the excavations
were discontinued.
' The accompanying diagram, giving a section of the mouno
in the direction of our cutting (which is shown in the shaded
part), will give the best notion of the position of the two deposits
Section of the Tumulus at St Weonard's.
at f and/, which represent the two pits dug through the ashes,
(represented by the black lines), to a small depth below. One o.
th»^ ;«:>ost interesting circumstances connected with the cutting
92 THE BRITOXS. [ciiai-. hi.
itself was that of" the re^nilav discolorations visible on the surface,
arisiii<>;, of course, from the employment of different kinds of
material, and displayini;- in a most remarkable manner the mode
in which the mound was raised. These are carefully fig-ured on
the accompanying- section. As I have ah-eady stated, the mass
of the mound consists of a uniform light-coloured sand ; but
from the point (i) near where we first fell in with the stones, a
narrow arched stripe occurs of a much darker mould, as represented
in the cut. Beyond this, two or three other bands of a similar
description, but thinner, and of a lig'hter- coloured soil, and,
therefore, less strongly marked, follow each other initil, at ^^, we
come upon a narrow band of small stones, also represented in
the cut, and at k, near the summit of the moimd, there is another
bed of similar stones. It is evident, therefore, that when the
small mounds roofed with stones had been raised over the
deposits of ashes, a circular embankment was next formed round
the whole, and from this embankment the workmen filled up the
interior inwards towards the centre. When they began filling in
they appear to have fallen in with some darker mould, which has
formed the band at i, and this dark band probably defines very
nearly the outlines of the first embankment. The lighter-shaded
bands show the successive fillings-in towards the centre, until at
last the workmen made use of a quantity of stones and rabble,
taken perhaps from the quarry which furnished the large stones
of the interior vaults. This bed of stones forms a kind of basin
in the middle of the mound. They went on filling again witli
the sand till the work was nearly finislied, when they returned
to the stony material again, Avhich appears at h. The length of
our cutting fi'om c to d was, as near as I could measure it with
accuracy, 46 feet 6 inches, and that of the surface from a to fj,
was 64 feet 5 inches ; as I have stated before, the height of this
cutting was 14 feet. The distance from a to k whs 29 feet 7
inches, making therefore the diameter of the platform on the top
of the mound, in the direction of our cutting, exactly 76 feet.
This I found to be rather the longest diameter, for the circle had
not been quite a perfect one, though very nearly so.'
The excavation of this fine barrow left no doubt of its sepul-
chral character, but no remains were found to show definitely the
])eople to whom it belonged, or the period at which it was
t^rected. It belongs to that class of monuments which are
evidently not more modern than the Roman period, and, having
no decidedly Roman character, have been set down as British.
Perhaps the truth is that it belongs to the perhaps earlier Roman
CHAP. III.] BRITISH B.\RROWS. 93
period, but that the persons to wliom it belonged were natives
of the soil who soti<i;ht to be bnried in the lloman manner. The
old road from Monmonth to Hereford, Avhich runs by it, was
p;n"haps a Roman road from Blesthim to Magna.
To judo^s by the barrows hitherto opened, it was not the
c.istora of the Britons to inter with their dead many articles of
value. By mncli the o^re iter number of barrows, whether large
or small, are fonnd to contain nothing- but urns and burnt bones.
In some cases we find a few implements of stone or bronze,
and, in much rarer instances, bsads and fragments apparently
of other personal ornaments occur. As these articles furnisli
the only evidence of tlie age of the barrow, and as they admit
of easy classification, they deserve particular attention Tlie
j)ottery, as being of more universal occurrence, demands our
first consideration, ^t is in general, though not always, very
]"udely made, not baked, but merely dried in the sun. Its forms
are peculiar, and have none of the elegance of the lloman urns.
They are ornamented more or less with parallel lines, zigzags,
crosses, dots, and otlier marks, which appear usually to have
been made by the hand, with some instrument like a stick
sharpened to a point, though they are sometimes more elabor-
ately and skilfully worked. Many, however, have no ornament
at all, which are usually those containing burnt bones.
A few examples are here given of the moi*e ordinary forms
of what are believed, and apparently with good reason, to be;
i^ritish urns. The most remarkable, and in general the most
carefully ornamented, class of British earthen vessels is that of
which specimens are here given, marked 1, 2, 3, 4. They vary
nuich in size, and in general have nothing in them. Some have
called them incense cups, Avhile others have believed them to be
drinking cups. No. 1 was found by Sir Richard Colt Hoare,
at the side of a skeleton in a barrow near Stonehenge ; the
original is about nine inches and a half high. No. 4, fouiul l)y
Mr Cunnington, also in a barrow in Wiltshire, was about the
same height, and six inches and a half in diameter over the
brim, holding about two quarts. This was a red ware, not bright
like the Roman pottery called Samian ware; and Mr Cunning-
ton found, at the same time, a much smaller vessel, of the same
form, but of a darker-coloured pottery. Nos. 2 and 3 were
found by Mr Bateman : the first in a barrow called Green
Lowe, on Alsop Moor, in Derbyshire, witli a skeleton ; and the
other in a large barrow at Castern, near Wetton, in Staftbrd-
shire, also with a skeleton. In the latter instance, Mr Batemau
91
THE BRITONS.
[chat. in.
snys, that the vase had internally an incrustation, as thoug-h t
had contained some liquid when deposited in the grave. Urns
of this description, which are baked, and not sun-dried, are
found more frequently in the south of F^ngland than elsewhere.
17 8 t) 4
One i'ouiul by Sir Richard Colt Hoare, in a barrow at Stone-
heng-e, was not above three inches high. These cups are
usually found with skeletons. The urns, Nos. 5 and 6, are
from barrows in the neighbourhood of Dorchester, opened by
Mr Sydenham, and described in the thirtieth volume of the
Archseologia. The tirst was seven inches and a half, the other
nine inches in height, and both had contained burnt bones.
Urns of the form No. 6, are frequently found in an inverted
position. Nos. 7, 8, 9, and 10, were found with a great many
others, more or less similar in form, in the Deverill barrow.
The loops found in Nos. 7 and 9 occur not unfrequently in
these British iu*ns, but it is uncertain if they were intended for
fixing cords for suspension, or if they were merely ornamental.
An \u'n closely resembling No. 7, and found in a cromlech in
the Chainiel Islands, has been engraved by Mr Lukis. The
other three, and especially No. 10, bear a rather striking resem-
blance in form to a class of burial urns, which recent researches
have proved to be Saxon, although they wei-e formerly cou-
CHAP. III.] IMPLEMENTS MADE OF ST05E. 95
sidered British. Specimens of tliese will be given further on ;
but one, taken from an Anglo-Saxon cemetery near Derby, is
given here, No. 12, for the sake of comparison. The Anglo-
Saxon urns are generally harder baked than the British ; tliey . /
are distinguished by some peculiarities in-" the form, and on ^
closer examination the ornament will be seen to be of a ditterent
character, and made in a difterent manner. No. 11, in our cut,
is an urn containing burnt bones, taken from a barrow in Coi-n-
wall. Similar urns are found in Wiltshire, Dorsetshire, and
other parts, especially in Yorkshire.
The foregoing are the more usual forms of supposed British
pottery, and Avill serve to give a general notion of its character.
Many other varieties, and some much more rude in form and
construction, occur, but they will generally be recognized by
the similarity of ornament to those given here.
As I have already observed, the other articles found in
the British barrows are not much diversified, and are of rare
occurrence. They consist chiefly of implements of stone and
implements of bronze. Those made of the former materials
are usually the heads of axes or hammers, chisels, and ai-ro\v-
heads.
Implements made of stone are found abundantly in all parts
of the British Islands, and we might add, all over the world ;
and nothing seems more natural, not only in a very rude state
of society, but also in much more civilized times, when com-
munication between different parts of the country was slow, and
metal was not always to be had, than to form rough tools or
weapons, especially for the chase, of hard stones. Stones of a
siliceous character, which were chipped into the required forms
without much difHculty, were used most generally for this pur-
pose. But other kinds of stone Avere also used.* Our cut in the
next page represents a few of the more usual types of the imple-
ments of stone found in this country, chiefly taken from originals
preserved in the museum of the Society of Antiquaries. Nos. 1
and 2 are dift'erent samples of axe-heads, the first, Avhich is
elaborately cut, found by Mr Bateman in a barrow in Derby-
shire, the othei" from the bed of the Severn at Ribbesford in
\Vorcestershire ; 3 and 4 appear to have been used as chisels,
* Mr Lukis (Journal of the Br. Arch. Ass., vol. iii. p. 127) f?ives the
following;- list of the substances from which stone weapons in his possession,
chiefly found in the Channel Islands, are made : serpentine, greenstone,
{granular greenstone, indurated claystone, trap f^'reenstone, claystone, quartz,
syenite, schistus, yellow hornstone or chert, granular porphyry, s/liceous
schist, serpentine or jade.
96
THE BRITONS.
[chap. hi.
and are very sharp at the broad end. No. 8 is a spear-head
9 is an instrument apparently intended for stabbing or boring- ;
7 is a chisel of a different form from the others; and 10 is a
piece of flint notched at tlie edge, so as to serve as a saw.
iSeveral of these stone saws have been found in ditt'erent parts
Implements of Stone.
of England. Nos. 5 and 6 are arrow-heads, taken by Sir
llichard Colt Hoare from barrows in Wiltshire, where, as well
as in Derbyshire, they are frequently found. A very large and
remarkable collection of stone implements, found chiefly in the
more easterly districts of Yorkshire, has been made by Mr
Edward Tindall, of Bridlington.
Stone knives are mentioned in the Old Testament (Joshua
V. 2), in a way which shows that implements of this material
may have been employed at times for special purposes. It has
been assumed rather hastily that where we find these imple-
ments of stone, the people to whom they belonged were not
acquainted with the art of working metals. That stone and
metal were in use for such implements at the same time is quite
evident from the manner in which they occur together. In the
tumuli in Wiltshire, the stone arrow-heads are usually found
with bronze daggers. In Derbyshire stone implements are found
not only with bronze, but with iron. Thus, in a barrow opened
CHAP. III.] STONE AXD METAL. 97
at Miiminglowe by Mr Bateman, an upper deposit of two
skeletons was accompanied with an urn, a flint arrow-head, a
small piece of iron, and part of a horse's bit; and lower down,
in the same barrow, an earlier interment, in a stone cist or
cromlech, was accompanied with an iron knife or dago^er in a
sheath of the same metal. Another interment in the same
barrow was accompanied with an ornamented urn of the same
description as the four first flgures in the preceding- group of
British pottery, a small brass pin, and an arrow-head of grey
flint. In a small barrow at Middleton-by-Yolgrave, a iiint
arrow-head was found Avith one of the small bronze chisels or
axes, which will be described further on. In a barrow called
C'arder-lowe, along- with a great number of implements of flint,
were found a bronze dagger and an iron knife ; there had been
several interments, no doubt at ditterent periods, but the bronze
dagger was found in a lower, and therefore older, deposit than
one which contained nothing but flint implements. A large
barrow opened by Mr Bateman in 1846, was supported at tlie
base by a regular circle of large stones, and had in the interior
a cromlech. Within the latter was found a skeleton, which was
accompanied with ' a brass dagger of the usual type, measuring-
six inches and a quarter in length, and in the highest preserva-
tion ; it has the appearance of having been silvered, and still
retains a brilliant polish. . . . near it were two instruments of
flint, and two more were found during the progress of the
examination of the tumulus.' A barrow with a cromlech cist
opened by the same gentleman in 1847, contained a skeleton,
with a flint spear-head and a bronze pin or bodkin, which had
been inserted in a wooden handle.
The stone chisels or axes are less frequently found in
tnmuli, than in accidental localities where there is nothing to
fix their date or to indicate the people to whom they belonged.
They are sometimes met with in a very rough condition, and
sometimes more or less flnished, and in one or two instances,
l)undles of finished and rough stone implements have been
found, as though they belonged to the stores of a manufacturer.
Tills is most frequently the case with the arrow-heads. In
other instances, especially in Scotland, bundles of flint chip- /
pings, or, as they have been termed, flint flakes, have beeny
found, which appear to have been struck oft' from a solid mass,
and, as these generally occur in districts where flint is not found
naturally, we are justified in regarding them as importations of
the; rough article, merely formed to the size required by the
98 THE BRITOXS. [chap. hi.
mnimtaoturer. Tii oxiinining; tliese implomcnts in tlie (lifi'erent
stati:es of their mauutactiire, as thus pn^seiited to iis, we become
convinced that not only must implements of metal liave been
used in makinu' them, but that some machine like a latlie nuist
hnve been used in boring' an I finishinii; them. Besides the fact
just stated of their having been deposited in the same inter-
ments with instniments of metal, insnlated facts liave occurred
corroboratino' the conclusions winch we should naturally draw
i'rom this circumstance. Tn France some of the stone imple-
ments are said to have heen found with handles of bone, but we
are assured of a circumstance still more intercstinij;, tluit at old
Toulouse one of these stone implements was found, in the place
of its original deposit, surrounded with a circle of iron that had
evidently tixed it to its handle.* Instances might be adduced
of the continuation of the use of implements of stone down
to a maich more recent date. Ac-Sordino- to the recital of
AVilliam of Poitiers, some of the Anglo-Saxons fought with
weapons of stone at the battle of Hastings : f and they are said
to have been employed by the Scots as late as the wars of
Wallace.
The older implements of metal found in this island are
generally of bronze. I here give a group of the more usual
forms of those attributed generally to the British period, all,
except No. 8, taken from specimens in the museum of the
Society of Antiquaries. No. 1 is the usual form of the bronze;
axehead or chisel, to which the name of celt has been given,
not because it was conceived to be characteristic of the Celtic
race, but because our earlier antiquaries supposed it to be the
instrument to which the Romans gave the name of celtU (a
chiselj.t. It has a socket for receiving the handle. Nos. 2
* See a paper in the llemoires de la Socitte ArcJttologique du Midi de
la France, torn. i. p. 78.
i" Jactant ciisiiides ac diversoruiii g'enerum tela, s;r?vissiinas quasque
secures, et lig-nis iinposita saxa. p. 201, ap. Uuchesne. These stones, fixed
on pieces of wood, were perhaps used for striking', as with clubs.
X The eai'liest dissertation on these instruments I know, is one by the
well-known antiquary, Thomas Heanie, to whom the historian Thoresliy
conimunicated some examples in his possession, found in Yorkshire.
Hearne wrote a long^ and learned epistle to Thoresby, in the December of
1709, which he printed as an appendix to the first volume of his edition of
liCland's Itinerary, under the title of ' A Discourse concerning some Anti-
quities found in Yorkshire,' and in which he stated his opinion that these
instruments were the Roman celtes or chisels. This opinion .seems to have
been generally ac(piiesced in by Hearne's contemporaries, and this particu-
lar tool obtained the name of a celtis or celt. Subsequent writers, ascribing
these instniments to the BritoDS; have retained the name, forgetting- itd
CHAP. III.]
BROXZE IMI'LEMENTS.
9:»
and 3, the latter found in tfie Isle of Inanet, ana laiCiV in tlie
museum of my friend Mr. Crofton Croker, are also common
S 2 13
Imp^eii^enls of Lronze.
forms, with a different contrivance for fixing the handle. No.
4 is another variety, exhibiting a much rarer form. There can
be no doubt that these were tools in very common use by work-
men in England at some period, for they are found very fre-
(luently, though very rarely in sepulchral interments, all over
tlie island ; and rather numerous instances have occurred of the
discovery of considerable quantities of thern, wliole or broken,
under circumstances which can leave no doubt of their having
been the stock in trade of some maker of such instruments.
They are found in great abundance in tlie county of Norfolk :
and they generally occur along with chisels of different forms,
and sometimes with spear-heads and daggers. In a meadow at
Stibbard, in the county of Norfolk, no less than seventy of the
so-called celts, and ten spear-heads of bronze, were found in a
single lot. In 1845, a quantity of such instruments, including
the chisels or axe-heads of the usual forms, with punches,
gouges, and other similar instruments, as well as several pieces
of unused metal, one of which appeared to have been the resi-
orisrin, and have applied it indiscriminately, not only to other implements
of bronze, but o\«n to the analo<;ous instruments of stone. It is not good
as a technical term, because it is mistaken too generally as implying that
things to which it is applied are Celtic, and it would therefore be better to
lay it aside.
H
100 THE BRITONS. [chap, in,
cliiuin left in the melting'-pot, were found at a villaij-e near
Attleborough, in the same county. A similar discovery of
bronze chisels, goug-es, &c., with portions of a bronze sword,
was made at Sittingbourne, in Kent ; and another occurred some
years ago in Shropshire, at the foot of the Wrekin. More re-
cently, at Westow, about twelve miles from York, a collection
of sixty similar instruments, presenting the same varieties, with
the addition of a piece of dagger or sword, and a similar piece of
bronze, which appeared to be the residuum from melting, were
found in an earthen jar or vase. A very similar hoard was found
in the parish of Lanant, in Cornwall, in the year 1802 ; and
Leland has recorded the discovery of a similar hoard in the
parish of St Hilary, in the same county, in the time of Henry
VIII. * A parcel of the so-called celts, spear-heads, and frag-
ments of swords, of bronze, were found by Mr Lukis in the
Isle of Alderney, under similar circumstances.
No. 7, in our cut, represents a bronze chisel, from a specimen
in the museum of the Society of Antiquaries, and will serve to
give a general idea of the forms of these instruments, as tbund
with the ' celts.' We are convinced at once that all these
instruments have been cast in moulds, and accordingly several
examples of these moulds have been found, both in England
and other countries. I have given examples, Nos. 5 and 0,
from casts in the museum of the Society of Antiquaries, of two
such moulds, found in Normandy ; they represent the two
varieties of which we have examples in the cut, Nos. 1, 2, and 3.
No. 8, in our cut, is a fragment of a bronze saw.
I have stated that antiquarian writers have been in the
habit of calling these bronze tools British, but 1 am inclined to
believe that Hearne was nearer the truth when he pronounced
them to be Eoman. The localities in which they have been
usually foiuid, especially when they have occurred in any
quantities, have generally been Eoman sites. One of the
moulds engraved above, is said to have been found by the side
of a Roman road, and tlie other at a place well known for its
Roman antiquities. The discovery at Sittingbourne, in Kent,
* ' There was found of late yeres syns, spere heddes, axis for warre,
jind swerdes, of coper, wrappid up in lynin scant perishid, near the mount
in St Hilaries paroch in the tynne works.' — Leland' s Itin., ed. Hearne,
vfil. iii. p. 7. The discoveries alluded to in the text will be found more
fully described in the ' Arch seologia,' vol. xv. p. 118; in the 'Journal
<if the British Arch.'voloprical Association,' vols. i. pp. 51, c9, and ii. pp.
!*, 58; and in Mr Iloach Smith's Collectanea Autism ^ vol. i. pp. iOl,
105.
CHAT. III.]
INSTRUMENTS OF BRONZE,
101
was made also near a Roman road, in the immediate vicinity
of an extensive Saxon cemetery, and perhaps further researches
will lay open Roman remains. The general shape and charac-
ter of these instruments seem to be nmch more like Roman
than anything we know of Celtic make; and I believe they are
found in Italy. The question here raised is, however, one of
considerable obscurity, until further discoveries, and a more
2 6
careful observation of the circumstances umn.'r wnuMi tney are
found, shall enable us to clear it awav.
102 THE BRITOXS. [cjhap. i;i.
Tlie frao-nients of swords found iu one or two instances with
these parcels of bronze instruments, were appai'ently placed
there as old metal. They belong to a class which have usually
been considered as Celtic by Eng-lish antiquaries, but Avhich I
have always regarded as unmistakably Roman. They are
found in England and Scotland, in Ireland, in Denmark (less
\ frequently), in Germany, in France, and, I believe, in Italy.
f Four specimens are given in the preceding cut. Th3 first
\ is preserved in the museum of the Society of Antiquaries
' of England, but it is uncertain where it was found. The
second was found at Arthur's Seat near Edinburgh, and is now
preserved in the museum of the Society of Antiquaries of
Scotland. The third was found in the bed of the Thames,
near Vauxhall, and the fourth at Twerton, near Bath. Tiie
two last are engraved in the Journal of the Archaeological
Association. They are short, usually from sixteen to eighteen
inches in length, and were evidently used for thrusting rather
than for cutting.
These swords, in whatever country Ave lind them, are so
uniform in shape, that we can hardly doubt their being all the
workmanship of one people. They do not answer the ancient
descriptions of the swords used by the Celts and Germans, who,
from the time when Marius encountered the Cimbrians and
Teutons, to the great battle in which Agricola defeated
the Britons under Galgacus, are described as using long
pointless swords.* Indeed, I believe, all people in a rude
/ state, whose soldiers are not highly disciplined, are more apt to
\/ use swords for striking than thrusting. We know that the
Romans had an advantage over their British foes in close
condjat, from the circumstance, that they used their short and
pointed swords in thrusting, while the Britons were unable to
use with the same effect their long pointless ones. The swords
of the form figured above have, I think, been genei'ally found
on or near lloman sites. Many are taken iip from the Thames,
where such multitudes of Roman Antiquities are found, but no
other swords that can be accounted Roman. The question,
iiowever, seems to be set at rest by discoveries in France. One
of these swords was found at Heilly, in the department
of the Somme, with other articles, among which were four
* Besides the niention of these long swords in the accounts of the battles
mentioned in the text, Dion Cassius, lib. xxxviii. c. 49, in his account of
''4'sar's battle with Ariovistus, in Gaul, mentions the large long swords of
tlie barbarians.
CHAP. III. J INSTRUMEXTS OF BROXZE. 103
brass coins of Caracalla; and another was found in another
locality along- with skeletons and coins, some of which belonged
to the emperor Maxentius, so that they could not have been
deposited there before the beginning of the fourth century
after Christ.* It may be added, that in the museum of the
Louvre, in Paris, there is one of these bronze leaf-shaped
swords (as they are usually termed), with its sheath, the latter
undoubtedly Roman ; and I am informed that there is another
similar sword and sheath in the Musee de I'Artillerie, also in
Paris.
It is well known that in some countries the use of copper
and bronze for weapons and other instruments preceded that of
iron. Copper weapons are supposed to have preceded those of
bronze. The alloy of tin in the latter metal gave it a hardness
and a brittleness not possessed by tlie pure copper, and th«
ancients are said, though on late and doubtful authority, to
have employed a method of tempering it as we do steel. The
weapons of the Homeric age were of these materials, whicli
appear to have been regarded almost with a superstitious vener-
ation by the llomans. In the treaty between Porsena and
the Koman people, about four hundred years before the Christian i
era, it was expressly stipulated that the llomans should not use
iron except for implements of agriculture. f It was not till
th]"ee hundred years later — that is, after the second Punic war
— that the Homans began to use iron in the fabrication of arms;
and it is a very remarkable circumstance, that in the battle in
which the Gauls were defeated by the consul /Emilius, when
the Eomans used swords of bronze, those of the Gauls, as we
are told by Polybius, Avere long, and so badly tempered, that
they bent when the Gallic warriors struck a hard blow against
the Roman armour. It would appear, from their being tern- n/
pered, that they Avere made of iron. |
Among the most curious of the instruments of bronze found
in this country, are the daggers or knives, which are not
unfrequently found in the barrows supposed to be British, and
were no doubt peculiar to the people Avho were buried in them.
* These are described in the fifth volume of the Mtmoires of the Insti-
tute of France, class of Litter atur e et Beaux Arts, pp. 193 and 501. I give
the reference from the work of M. Mauduit, mentioned below.
t In foedere quod repulsis regibus populo Romano dedit Porsena, nomi-
native comprehensiim invenimus, ne ferro nisi in agricultura uterentur. —
Flinii Hist. Nat. lib. xxxiv. c. 14.
X Much information on the early use of bronze will be found in the
Dtcoi-overtes du/ts la Troade, by M. Mauluit, Paris, 18i0.
Ui
THE BRITOXS.
[chap. in.
The usual forms of these instruments will be best understood
by cbo accompanying cut. They are found frequently witliout
Bronze daggers or knives.
handles, but with the rivets which fixed them, and the bladt^
ii'enerally bears marks of havino- been placed in a shank of
wood. The handle appears to have been generally of the same
material, and has only been preserved Avhere, in particular
instances, it has been made of ivory or bone. The blades are
from six to ten inches long ; sometimes they are much smaller.
At first, until one was found with a handle, they were supposed
to be spear-heads. Tn a barrow at Normanton, in Wiltshire,
Sir Richard Colt Hoare found the handle of one of these
daggers, of wood, richly ornamented with zig-zags and lines,
resembling those found on the pottery, formed by innumerable
diminutive points or pins of gold driven into the wood. It is in
the barrows of Wiltshire and Dorset that these bronze daggers
are found most abundantly. A few have been met with in
Derbyshire, and they occur more rarely in Scotland ; they are,
however, not uncommon in Ireland ; they are also found in
Gaul. The figure No. 2, in the group above, represents one
of these dagger or knife blades of the more usual form, which
was found in a barrow called Dowe-lowe, near Church-Sterndale,
in Derbyshire, opened by Mr Bateman : it accompanied a
CHAP. III.] THE GOLD CORSET. IC)
skeleton. No. 5, is a dcig'^iTr of the same form, Avitli a liaiullc,
found by Sir "Richard Colt Hoare in a barrow at Brio-milson in
Wiltshire, accorapanyino- an urn with ashes ; and No. 3 is a
blade of exactly the same form, found in Ireland, and formerly
in the possession of my friend the late Mr Crofton Croker. No. V
1 is a somewhat similar bronze blade, found at Pitcaithly, in
Perthshire; Avhile the other, No. 4, with the same shaped blade,
but with its handle of ivory, came from a bari'ow near Bland-
ford, in Dorsetshire. This latter is in a perfect state of pre-
servation ; it was found with two bronze speardieads, iyini;
beside an urn with burnt bones.
There are very few other articles found under circumstances
which could lead us to ascribe them to the Celtic population of
our island. Bronze spear-heads, often with loops at the side, t/
are found under the same circumstances as the swords, and uo
doubt belonged to the same people. A few persoiud ornaments,
chietiy beads, with now and then a piece of bone or metal, are
found in some of the barrows of Derbyshire, Wiltshire, and
Dorset. Several discoveries have also been made of circular
shields, generally of bronze, and of rather small dimensions,
which have been considered to be British, though the justice
of this appropriation is doubtful. Traces of a metal cover-
ing for the breast, very thin, and therefore more for orna-
ment than protection, have also been found with skeletons,
apparently of this early date. The most remarkable discoveiy
of this kind was made in the October of 1833, at Mold, in
Flintshire. A mound, composed of pebbles and stones, had
long stood at the corner of a field, and it Avas then cleared
away for agricultural purposes. It was found to contain inter-
ments of urns and burnt bones, and also, in another part of
the mound, a skeleton, round the breast of Avhich was a corset
of thin gold, eud)ossed with an ornamentation resembling nail
heads and lines. Tins interesting article is uoav in the British
Museum. This barrow was called by the Welsh peasantry
hrt/N-yr-elbjUori, or the hill of fairies or goblins ; and it was
believed to be haunted. But the most curious circumstance
connected with it was the declaration, nuide before it was
opened, of a woman of the neighbourhood, that, as she was
going home late one night and had to pass by it, she saw
moving over the barrow, a spectre ' clothed in a coat of gold,
which shone like the sun.'
It is the business of the antiquary, by comparing and dis-
criminating the objects of each period, to make them throw
new light on the manners and condition of the people to whom
1G6 THE BRITONS. [chap. hi.
they belon*!;, and also to endeavour to tracs, by tlieir peculiar-
ities, the movements of the different tribt^s, and the positions
they occupied. Unfortunately, the antiquities of the British
period ] ave as yet proved but of little use in either of these
points of view. The solitary daii^o-er, with the few fragments •
of pottery, and two or three beads or pins, can give us no
satisfactory notion of the dress or riches of the person who wore
them. If, as Caesar says was the practice among the Gauls,
the Britons buried Avith their dead all the articles of value they
possessed, they must indeed have been poor. But it is hardly
probable that the contents of the graves, as we now find them,
are any fair measure of the wealth of those who were buried in
them. We cau feel no doubt, after a comparison of their
contents, that the cromlechs and the other barrows of which
we have been speaking, belong to the same people, and that
they are of about the same date. They occur in large groups.
The Kits-Cotty House group belongs to Kent; there was
another group in the valley of the White Horse, in Berkshire ;
another lay in Oxfordshire ; a larger group lay in Dorsetshire ;
then came the vast group about Stonehenge ; and finally, a
tolerably numerous one in Cornwall. The only large group of
the interior is that of Derbyshire. There is a group towards
the south-east of Yorkshire, and they are scattered over Wales,
and in the Isle of Anglesea. This distribution woidd certainly
lead us to imagine that the barroAVs and other monuments of
this island, which w^e are accustomed to attribute to the Druids,
belong, not to the earlier Celtic population, but to the later
settlers. If this be the case, we might perhaps go further, and
assume that the British population of the earlier mining dis-
tricts, Cornwall, Wales, and Derbyshire, Avas also composed of
later settlers, wdio knew hoAv to work the metals, of Avhich the
earlier aboriginal tribes Avere perhaps ignorant. But these are
obscure questions, Avhich we are, from Avant of accurate know-
ledge, unable to solve ; and it must not be forgotten that the
cromlechs are numerous in Ireland.
The next question that presents itself, with relation to these
monuments, is their date, which I am inclined to believe less
remote than is usually imagined. It has often been a fault
among antiquaries to be too eager in fixing great antiquity on
everything about Avhich they are uncertain. The comparison
of these barrows Avith one another, Avhile it shows that some of
them had served apparently for family sepulchres during a
length of time, Avould lead us to think that they mav in general
cii.M". Ill] THE AGE OF CPtOMI.ECHS. IC?
be placed within no very wide limits. In times like these of
which we are now treatinfi-, individuals possessed but a small
quantity of personal property ; the communication between one
place and another was slow and uncertain ; and while one man,
l)y accident or throuji'h his superior Avealth and power, had
weapons and other implements of bronze or iron, or even of
silver and ^old, his neighbour might be obliged to remain con-
tent with a chisel or axe of stone, or, if a hunter, he might be
satisfied with a few Hint-headed arrows to his bow. In the
same way, one man might be rich or ostentatious enough to
depose in the gi'ave elegant vessels of superior manufacture,
while another at the same time would use only the rude urn of
chiy and gravel baked hastily in the sun. Nothing indeed is
more unsafe than the rule that mere rudeness of consti-uction
is a proof of antiquity. One or two circumstances have been
discovered that are certainly rather startling. In Belgium, on
the borders of the Ardennes, a cromlech with a Roman intei*-
ment in it has been recently found in the middle of a Eoman
cemetery.* A discoveiy of a somewhat similar kind was made
by Mr Bateman, in his researches among the barrows of
Derbyshire, which he describes as follows : ' In a plantation on
the summit of Minninglowe Hill,' he says, ' are two tumuli
of large size, one being nearly fifteen feet high from the level
of the ground. In the centre, and in four places in the area of
the circle, are large cists, or, as they now appear, from the soil
being removed from them, large cromlechs, exactly of the same
construction as that well-known Driddical structure, Kits-Cotty
House. They are formed of the large limestones of the country,
and have all had covers of the same, only two of which now
remain in their places The soil in the interior of the
cists of the large barroAV was removed down to the surface of
the rock on the 5th of July, 1843, when it was found that all
the interments had been before removed, with the exception of
one, which was a skeleton, laid at full length on the outside of
the cist, imaccompanied by any weapon or ornaments. In the
cell near wduch this body lay, were found fragments of five
* ' Le seul tombeau qui, dans ce cimetiere Romain, ineritait ce nom,
cotisistait. en cinq enornies pierres en quartiers de roches. Trois de ces
pierres foriiiaieut un triangle dont les deux autres etaient la base et le cou-
vercle. Dans ce tombeau, ainsi que pies des assietles niortuaires, j'ai
trouve des feiTements et des clous, qui indiqueraieut que ces restes de
Koniains auraient ete ent'ermes dans une sorte de cercueil en bois, dont il
ne Y'^te plus tneo.' — Ihdletin de la SociHd llistoriqae et Archioloyiqne di
iSoissoi's, torn. iii. p. 187.
V
VCS THE BIUTOXS. [chap. hi.
urns, some animal bones, and six tliird brass Roman coins,
namely, one of Claudius Goihicus, two of Constantine the
Greal, two of Constantine Junior, and one of Yalentinian. An
attempt to penetrate the substance of the mound was then
made, which, from want of time, proved ineft'ectual. A few
human teeth, and a third brass coin of Constantine, were the
only relics found in this part of the excavation.' Sir Richard
Colt Hoare also found Eoman coins in one of the supposed
British barrows in Wiltshire,
These facts niig'ht perhaps be considered to be accidental ;
but it is very remarkable that the only excavation within the
area of Stonehenge of which we possess any account, brought
to light Roman remains. We are informed by Aubrey that
the Duke of Buckingham, in 1620, * did cause the middle of
Stonehenge to be digged, and this under digging was the cause
of the falling downe or recumbencie of the great stone there.'
He tells us that in the course of this ' digging ' they found
' a great many horns of stags and oxen, charcoal, batter-
dashes (?), heads of arrows, some pieces of armour eaten out
with rust, and rotten bones.' An inscribed tablet of tin is
pretended to have been found at Stonehenge, in the reign of
Henry A' HI. ; and, according to Inigo Jones, the cover of a
t/mrtb/ilniji, or incense-cup, was found within the area at a
later period. ' In more modern times,' adds Sir Richard Colt
Hoare, whose description is more to be depended upon, ' we
have found, on digging, several fragments of Roman as Avell as
of coarse British pottery, parts of the head and horns of deer
and other animals, and a large barbed arrow-head of iron. ])r
Stukeley says that he dug close to the altar, and at the depth
of one foot came to solid chalk. Mr Cunnington also dug
about the same place to the depth of nearly six feet, and found
that chalk had been moved to that depth ; and, at the depth
of three feet, he found some Roman pottery, and, at the depth
of six feet, some pieces of sarsen stones, three fragments of
coarse half-baked pottery, and some charred wood. . . . Jn
digging into the ditch that surrounds the area, Mr Cunnington
found similar remnants of antiquity ; and in the waggon tracks,
near Stonehenge, you frequently meet with chippings of the
stones of which the temple was constructed. Soon after the
fall of the great trilithon in 1797, Mr Cunnington dug out
some of the earth that had fallen into the excavation, and found
a fragment of fine black Eoman pottery, and since that another
piece in the same spot ; but I have no idea that this pottery
CHAr, III.] BlUTISII COINS. 109
ever lay beneath the stones, but probably in the earth adjoining
the trilithon, and, after the downfall of the latter, it fell witli
the mouldering- earth into the excavation.'
Although some of the remains of antiquity which are from
time to time dug up in our island may belong to an age more
I'emote. the most probable view of the case seems to be, that
the mass of our British antiquities belong to the age immedi-
ately preceding the arrival of the Eomans, and to the period
which followed.
The date of one class of British antiquities, the coins, are
more easily fixed, and they will, perhaps, eventually throw
some light on one period of British history. These coins have
been found in considerable quantities in most parts of England,
often in hoards, and they are remarkable for the large propor-
tion in gold and silver. Many of them have inscriptions,
always in Eoman characters, which, as far as we can judge
from discoveries hitherto made, express the names of the chiefs
for whom they were minted. In form they resemble the Greek
coinage, being thicker in proportion to their size than Eoman
coins, and usually slightly convex on one side and concave on
the other. Some of these British coins show a considerable
degree of artistic skill, and bear distinct representations of
human heads, animals, and other figures, while a still greater
number are extremely rude, and some of them bear confused
marks and attempts at devices which appear totally inexplica-
ble. These, like everything that is mysterious, have furnished
ground for many theories, founded on the supposition that they
had some connection with the mythology or history of the
lU'itish tribes. But a more careful study and comparison has
shown us that the British, like the Gallic coinage, consisted
merely of imitations of Greek and, subsequently, of Eoman
coins. It appears that when the chiefs began to mint money,
they adorned it with mere copies of the figures on foreign coins
brought as models by their coiners, and that, while their rela-
tions with Eome induced them to adopt Eoman inscriptions,
they chose in preference the forms and pictorial devices of tlu;
money of Greece, selecting especially those of the Macedonian
kings. The first minters were probably brought over from Gaul,
and they made tolerably good, copies of the originals, as we find
to be the case in many of the coins of Cunobeline. Subsequently
these copies served again as models to British and very unskilful
artists, and in their hands they gradually degenerated into
forms which can only be understood when we place them beside
no
THE BRITOXS.
[chap. !TI
the more perfect copies from whicli they were imitated. Some-
times we only trace the British imitation of the Greek coin
throuo-h an intermediate Gallic copy. To explain better this
g-radual deg-eneration, and furnish at the same time an example
of one of the ruder types of the British coins, we g'ive a cut
representino- three gold coins, in their obverses and reverses.
The uppermost is a li'old stater of Philip of Macedon. The
Greek and British Coins.
second is a gold coin of one of the Gaulish chiefs, in whicl;
the head of the king is copied in a very rude manner, with
the wreath round the head; but the charioteer and horses are
given in a manner much more rude, though still distin-
guishable. The name of Philip has been transformed into a
rude ornament. The lowermost coin is a rude British copy
of the same type — one of a hoard of British gold coins found in
Whaddon Chace. Until compared with the two previous coins,
we cannot even guess at what the coiners intended to repre-
sent ; but on laying the three coins thus side by side, we trace
distinctly on the obverse the wreath and ears of the head of
Philip of Macedon, while it is equally evident that the reverse
<H\V. III.]
BRITISH COINS.
lU
was intended as a copy of tlie cliarioteer. In this, as in many
cases of the British coinage, the die was cut clumsily and nuicli
larg'er than the piece of metal which was to receive the impres-
sion. Hence the coin only represents a part of the sidjject,
and as the metal sometimes fell on one side of the field, and
sometimes on another, we have often to compare several
examples of a British coin before we get the design complete ;
md the accidental discovery of one which contains a portion ot'
the design not previously fovmd often explains what was before
unintelligible. Our next cut represents another palpable copy
Greek and British Coins.
of a Greek coin. The large figure is the obverse of a silver
tetradrachm of Alexander the Great, in which that monarch is
represented under the character of Hercules, with the head aiul
mane of the lion's skin over his head, and the claws tied in a
knot under his neck and chin. The smaller coin beside it is a
silver coin of a British chief, whose name is represented by the
Koman letters epat. Mr Beale Poste has, I think, mistaken
part of what was intended to represent the lion's claws for a
Greek K, and he proposes to read the inscription in Greek
characters, KEPAT (/cerat), which he interprets as referring to
('aractacus. But, in general, the British coins seem rather to
have been struck by chiefs who were friendly or submissive to
the liomans, than by those who were warring against them.
The eagle on the reverse of the coin just described was probably
also copied from a Greek or Eoman model. Among the Roman
coins copied by the Britons is one of Augustus, with a figure
of Victory seated on the reverse. Future examinations and
discoveries will, no doubt, lead to the identification of them all.
A figure of an animal, on some British brass coins found in
Kent, is evidently the rude copy ot an elephant, from one of the
consular coins. The charioteer of the coin of Philip, copied
112 THE BRITOXS. [chap. in.
more or less rudely, is rather a common reverse of tlie British
coins. Many of the fig-ures, still unintelligible, will probably
be explained by future discoveries. One of the reverses of the
coins of Tasciovanus, which has been described as ' an unknown
ornament,' seems to have been intended for the prow of a
Roman g'alley.
The knowledo'e of British coins is as yet in its infancy, and
comparatively little has been done towards classifying them in
a satisfactory manner. From the process of degeneration
shown above, and other circumstances, it appears tliat the
ruder coins are often to be considered, in point of date, as the
latest, and not as the earliest. The best in point of workman-
ship, and the most numerous, are those of Tasciovanus and
Cunobeline : of the latter nearly fifty varieties are already
known. Of the names inscribed on these coins, the varieties
are not numerous, and it seems most probable that they all
represent chiefs. The greater number are, unfortunately,
without inscriptions, and, therefore, it is impossible from the
coins themselves to determine the tribes or chiefs to whom they
belonged. By careful observations of the places where they
were discovered, certain types have been found to be peculiar to
certain districts, and it is not unreasonable to suppose that they
belonged to the British tribes there located. But we must
wait till further discoveries throw light on this subject. It is
impossible to say how long the Bi'itish coinage remained in
circulation ; but it has been found mixed with E-oman money,
though I believe the latter was of the consular period or of the
earlier emperors.
Among the monuments of a remote period which it is most
difficult to class, are the earthworks and entrenchments which
are found in considerable numbers in every part of our island.
In some parts there is scarcely a hill-top which is not crowned
with a circle of ditches and embankments, and in some cases they
are of colossal magnitude. These have been ascribed, too indis-
criminately and too hastily, to the British period, and have
been called British camps and British towns. In some cases,
it will be found, on examination, that these entrenchments
were merely intended to inclose a barrow or a cemetery. ISome
of them were, probably, medieval. They may, in some
instances, have inclosed a primitive town or village : and we
know that the early Anglo-Saxon mansion was a mere structiu'e
of wood inclosed by an earthen entrenchment. It has been
also rather too hastily assumed that the Komans never, under
CHAP. Ill] r,lUTISH VILLAGES. 113
cUiy circumstances, departed from the rectanp:ular system of
castrametation, which is not justilied by a careful examination
of facts.
Nevertheless, if there is a difficulty in fixing" the date of
what are usually called British camps, there is one very inter-
esting- class of earthworks which, doubtless, belong to an early
period, and which are scattered over many parts of our island.
They are genei'ally found at some distance from the Eoman
towns, but they are usually not far from Roman roads. These
are groups of shallow pits, or rather of bowl-shaped excavations,
on the surface of the ground. These curious works have been
observed with most care by Sir Eichard Colt Hoare, in Wilt-
shire, who calls them British villages ; but they occiu* in
Leicestershire, Derbyshire, Yorkshire, and probably in most
other parts of the country, where the traces of them have not
been obliterated by cultivation ; but some of the most perfect
specimens are met with on the Wiltshire downs. Two such
traces of settlements are found on Knook Down, near Heytes-
bury, which seem to have been protected by an ancient fortress,
now called Knook Castle. Sir Richard Colt Hoare states that
' the site of these villages is decidedly marked by great
cavities and irregularities of ground, and by a black soil.
Where the moles were more abundant, numerous coins were
constantly thrown up by them, as well as fragments of pottery
of different species. On digging in these excavations, we
tind the coarse British pottery, and almost every species of what
has been called Roman pottery ; also Jibulce, and rings of brass
worn as armillce or bracelets ; flat-headed iron nails, hinges of
doors, locks and keys, and a variety of Roman coins, of which
the small brass of the lower empire are the most numerous, and
particularly those of the Constantine family. Of the larger
and first brass, we have coins of Vespasian, Nerva, Antoninus,
Trajan, Julia Mammsea, and Postumus ; of the denarii, we
have Caligula, the elder Faustina, Julia Mammsea, the elder
Philip, Gallienus, and Gratianus : the small brass are too
numerous to particularize, but some of the smallest are remark
able, having only a radiated head (often very rude), and one or
two Roman letters, which, perhaps, may have been struck
during the latest struggles between the Britons and Saxons.
In digging within these British villages, we have but rarely
discovered any signs of building with stone or flint ; but we
have several times found very thin stones laid as floors to a
room. The fire-places were small excavations in the ground, in
lU THE BEITOXS. [chap. hi.
which we liave frequently fouud a large flat henrthstoiie ; and
in two parts of this extensive village we have discovered hypo-
ca lists similar to those in the Roman villa at Pitmead, near
Warminster. These are regular works of masonry, made in
the form of a cross, and covered Avith large flat stones, well
cemented hy mortar. We have also, dnring onr investigations
of this spot, repeatedly fonnd pieces of painted stncco, and of
brick flues ; also pit-coal, and some fragments of glass, or
crystal, rings, beads, &c. In one of the banks raised for the
old habitations, we discovered a skeleton with its head laid
towards the north ; at its feet was a tine black celt [of stone],
and at the distance of a few feet was a bead. In this, as well
as in the generality of other Bi'itish villages, the attentive eye
may easily trace ont the lines of honses, and the streets, or rather
holiow ways condncting to them ; these are particularly visible
in the npper village on these downs, as w^ell as the entrance to
it. The whole adjoining country is also strongly marked by
the intersection of slight banks along the sides of the hills,
which point to us the limits of ancient British cultivation, and in
many instances the smallness of them will show^ the contracted
scale on which agriculture was at that time carried on.'
Several groups of similar works are described by the same
writer in ditt'erent parts of his great work on ancient Wiltshire.
Of these not the least remarkable is the very extensive group
called the Pen Pits, near Stonrton, the character of which ap-
pears somewhat doubtful. Another group, of a moi"e deflnite
character, runs along the brow of a slight eminence in the
neighbourhood of Wily, known by the popular name of Stockton
Works. ' Stockton Works,' says Sir Kichard Colt Hoare, ' ap-
pear to have been originally surrounded by a ditch, and a single
rampart of earth, of which a considerable part towards the east
still remains ; but the western boundary, and many of the in-
terior w^orks, have been much defaced by a great waggon track,
which for many ages has passed through the works. The ori-
ginal entrance w-as on the eastern side, near the head of a steep
valley; but many other adits, of a more modern date, have beer
made for the accommodation of Avaggons frequenting the wood.
At one point there is also an entrance to an inner work, where
we see lumierous excavations, &c., and near the centre is a sin-
gular little work of a pentagonal form ; and beyond it the irregu-
larities and cavities continue deep and numerous for a consider-
jible distance to the westward. These works cover the space of
sixty-two acres, and extended, probably, much further towards
CHAP. III.] BRITISH VILLAGES. llo
tlie west, and into the wood on the soiitli, but they are so defaced
ill njany places, and in others so very doubtful, that what now
remains can only be considered as a veiy imperfect specimen of
tlie original works. We have dug in various places within the
area, and found both large and small lloman coins, pieces of
brass, iron nails, fragments of millstones, brick flues, tiles, and
both British and lloman pottery ; also the neck of a glass bottle,
of a sea-green colour: in short, all the vestiges of a numerous
popidation.' The writer from whom we are quoting adds : —
' A series of coins, from the first Claudius to Theodosius, mark
also their continued residence on this spot for a long period ;
they are so numerous and common, that the labourers employed
to dig flints throw them up and leave them amongst the
stones : twice, on visiting these works, I found coins in this
situation.'
There can be little doubt that the excavations described by
Sir Richard Colt Hoare are the floors of dwellings, the supei-
structure of which consisted of perishr.ble materials ; and we
should be justified in considering them as the remains of the
villages occupied by tlie pastoral and agricultural popuhitiou
during the Roman occupation of the island. What he calls
British pottery was no doubt the commoner and rougher de-
cription of Roman ware ; and the coins, which he could not ap-
propriate, seem to have been the small rude coins, or possibly
the later imitations of the Roman money, known to antiquaries
by the name of ml/ilmi. This may be remarked as a very
curious circumstance, because, though it has nothing to do with
the antiquities of the British period, it seems to show, that in
some parts of the island, even in the country villages, the
peasantry were not driven from their habitations. In other
parts of the country, we have not always the same certain indi-
cations of the people who inhabited the settlements indicated
by their excavations, as were found in Wiltshire, and in some
places perhaps they only mark the sites of villages of a much
later date, destroyed amid the turbulence of the middle ages.*
* A careful antiquary makes the following: remarks, in the Leicester
Chroxicle, on the 'Deserted Villa<;-es ' of Leicestershire :— ' On the north-
eastern side of the county of Leicester may be found, apart from human
habitations, sites of ancient villages, of which not a fragment is now
visible above-ground. One of these lies near Ingarsby, a second near Cold
Newton, and a third near Humberstone. An ordinary passer-by would
not notice these curious sites, and the peasant may daily pass over their
broken surfaces without experiencing any emotion of curiosity or interest ;
but it is not so with the intelligent man and the reader of history. In iheir
116 THE BRITONS. [chap. hi.
We find the habitations of the early inhabitants of these
ishmds under eircninstances wliich seem to denote a still lower
scale of civilisation. These are the caves on the sea-coast, such
as Kent's Hole, near Torquay, in Devonshire, and other caves
on that and the Cornish coast, which interest the geologist as
well as the antiquary. The cave just mentioned was explored
by a local geologist, who has given the folloAving account of
the appearances which presented themselves when it was first
examined: — 'The fioor of the entrance, except tliat it had the
appearance of being broken np, offered nothing remarkable to
detain us. We shall have occasion to return to it presently.
Not so the lateral branch by wliich it communicaies with the
body of the cavern on the left. Under a ledge on the left was
found the usual sprinkling of modern bones, and, in the mould
beneath, which had acquired the consistence of hard clay, were
fragments of pottery, calcined boo-es, charcoal, and ashes ; in
the midst of all were dispersed arrow-heads of fiint and chert.
The ashes furnishes a lai'ge proportion of the mould. In the
same heap were discovered round slabs of rooting slate, of a
plate-like form, some crushed, others entire. The pottery is
of the rudest description, made of coarse gritty earth, not
tiu'ued on a lathe, and sun baked ; on its external marghi it
bears zigzag indentations, not unlike those represented on the
urns found by Sir Richard Colt Hoare in the bai-rows of Wilt-
shire. These fragments, there seems no reason for doubting,
are the remains of cinerary urns, which once contained the sub-
stances scattered around, and to which the slates served for
covers. At a short distance, nearer the entrance, were found,
in a continuation of the same mould, articles of bone of three
sorts ; some of an inch long, and pointed at one end, or arrow-
niinds these spots excite inquiry and reflection. They know that the face
of the country has witnessed many a " bloody broil," and that populous
hamlets have been razed to the gi-ound in the times of civil war or feudal
contest. One of the sites well calculated to elicit observation lies, as we
have hinted, near to Humberstone. About two miles to the north-east of
it, midway between Barkby and Scraptoft, may be found a field present-
ing numerous irregularities of surface, which is known as the " Town
field." On paying a vi.sit to this a few days ago, we were struck with
the evidence it afforded of former occupancy, and of having been covered
with buildings and fortitied works. It slopes in a northerly direction, a
brook running along the lower ground. On the upper part may be traced
very clearly three sides of an encampment or enclosure, defended by a
mound and' trencli. In the part bordering on the brook, but higher up
in the field, traces of the existence of buildings are obvious. There can be
little doubt this is the site of the town of Hamilton, which is marked in
maps as being in this quarter.'
CHAP. III.] HABITATIONS IX CAVES. 117
heads ; others ahoiit tliree inches long, rounded, slender, and
likewise pointed. Conjecture was long busy as to their destin-
ation. They were thought by some to be bodkins, by others
for confining the hair, like those ornaments used by the women
in Italy ; lastly, they were supposed, with more probability, to
be a species of pin for fastening in front the skin which served
savages for garments. The third article does not seem so easy to
explain ; it is of a different shape, quite flat, broad at one end,
pointed at the other ; the broad part retains the truncated form
of a comb, the teeth of which were broken ott' near their root ;
whether it was used for a comb, or for making nets for fishing,
is not clear. There was only this solitary example found, and
two of tlie former, but several of the first, with a quantity of
bone chips. All three bore marks of polish. Nearer the
mouth we collected a good number of shells of the mussel, lim-
pet, and oyster, with a palate of the scarus. Tliis, as well as
the nacre of oysters, which was thickly disseminated througli
the mould, served, as they do at the present day among the
savages, most probably for ornament. Tlie shell-fish may have
furnished bait for fishing. The presence of these rude articles
renders it probable that they were collected here by the ancient
al)origines, who divided their time between the chase and
fishing in the adjacent sea. Close to the opposite wall, in
the same passage, buried in black mould, I found a stone
hatchet, or celt, of sienite, the only one found in the cavern.
Another of the same material, but of a different shape, I
found shortly after, not far from the cavern, near Anstis Cove,
which labourers engaged in making the new cut had just thrown
up with the mould. As we advanced towards the second mouth,
on the same level, were found, though sparingly, pieces of pot-
tery. The most remarkable product of this gallery were round
pieces of blue slate, about an inch and a half in diameter, and
a quarter thick. In the same quarter were likewise found sever-
al round pieces of sandstone grit, about the form and size of a
dollar, but thicker and rounder at the edge, and in the centre
pierced with a hole, by means of which they seem to have been
strung together like beads. Clusters of small pipes or icicles
of spar, such as depended from the roof at our first visit, we
saw collected here in heaps, buried in the mud. Similar
collections we had occasion to observe accompanied by char-
coal, throughout the entire range of the cavern, sometimes
in pits excavated in the stalagmite. Copper ore, Avith these
varioiis articles in the same stuff", was picked up ; a lump mucli
U
118 THE BRITONS. [chap. hi.
oxvdised, wliich the late Mr Phillips analysed, was found to be
pure virgin ore.
' Havino- taken a general survey of the surface of tlie floor, we
returned to the point from which we set out, viz., the common
passage, for the purpose of piercing into the materials below
the mould. Here, in sinking a foot into the soil (for of stalag-
mite there remained only the broken edges adhering to the
sides of the passage, and which appeared to be repeated at
intervals), we came upon flints in all forms, confusedly disse-
minated through the earth, and intermixed with fossil and
liuman bones, the whole slightly agglutinated together by cal-
careous matter derived from the roof. My collection possesses
an example of this aggregation in a mass, consisting of pebbles,
clay, and bone, in the midst of which is imbedded a fine blade
of flint, all united together by sparry cement. The flints were
in all conditions, from the rounded pebble as it came out of the
chalk, to the instruments fabricated from them, as arrow and
spear-heads, and hatchets. Some of the flint blocks were chip-
ped only on one side, such as had probably furnished the axes ;
others on several faces, presenting planes corresponding exactly
to the long blades found by their side, and from which they
had been evidently sliced ofl" ; other pebbles still more angular
and chipped at all points, were no doubt those which yielded
the small arrow-heads. These abounded in by far the greatest
number. Small irregular splinters, not referable to any of the
above divisions, and which seem to have been struck oft* in the
operation of detaching the latter, not urdike the small chips in
a sculptor's shop, were thickly scattered throughout the stufl^',
indicating that this spot was the workshop where the savage
prepared his weapons of the chase. . . . With the exception of a
boar-spear (of iron) and a blade of the same metal not far from
it, very much rusted, all the articles in the mould or in the dis-
turbed soil consisted of flint, chert, sienite, and bone.' *
These caves, like the remains of the villages already described,
were probably inhabited in the time of the Eoman rule, but by
that portion of the population who lived by fishing. We need
only look to the condition of the fishers and wreckers on the
wilder parts of the Cornish coast not a hundred years ago, to
form a notion of what must have been the savage mode of life
of a similar class in the same localities long after the Eoman
* ' Cavern Researches ; or, Discoveries of Organic Remains, and of
British and Roman Reliques, in the Caves of Kent's Hole, Anstis Cove,
&c.' By the Rev. J. MacEnery.
CHAP. III.] IIABITATIOXS IX CAVE^. 119
occupation. Caves of a very similar character have been dis-
covered more recently in King's Scar, near Settle, in Yorkshire, '^'
in which the remains are mostly Roman, and they were here
mixerl with coins, some of which were Roman, while the greater
proportion belonged to that class of rude copies of Roman coins,
struck when the island was losing its dependence on Rome.
The fisher population is thus traced in these rude habitations,
uninterrupted in their vocation, and probably unchanged in
their condition and manners, through the revolutions of empires.
* A description of these sing-ular caves, with a number of engravings,
will be found in Mr Roach Smith's ' Collectanea Antiqua,' vol. i. p. 69.
120 THE ROMANS. [chaiv iv.
V
CHAPTER IT.
Britain at the beg-innmg of the Second Century — Towns enumerated hv
Ptolemy — Hadrian — The Wall — LoUius Urbicus ; the Wail of Auiu-
ninus — Rebellion of the Soldiery in Britain — Albinus contends for the
Purple — Campaigns of Severus, who dies at Eburacuiu {York) — The
Caledonians — Carausius usurps the Purple— AUectus — Britain re-
stored to the Empire by Constantius— Constantine the Great — Revolt
of Maffnentius — The Picts and Scots.
Before the end of the first centnvy, "Britain was reduced to
a Roman province ; it began to receive an influx of population
from foreign lands, and there appears to have been a frequent
and general intercourse between this island and Rome. Its
exports, and even its peculiarities, were already well known in
Italy. The oysters of Rutupise {RlcJi borough) were favourites
at the table of the rich —
Ostrea,
Rutupinove edita fundo
and the whales which were seen in the British seas were pro-
verbial for their magnitude —
Quanto delphinis balsena Britannica major.
The same poet, Juvenal, tells us that the learning and elo-
quence of Greece and Rome had established themselves in the
far west —
Nunc totus Graias nostrasque habet orbis Athenas ;
Gallia causidicos docuit facuuda Britannos ;
De conducendo loquitur jam rhetore Thule.
A boast of his contemporary. Martial, leaves no doubt of the
rapid progress which civilisation had made in this land after tlie
Roman legions had taken possession of it —
Dicitur et nostros cantare Britannia versus.
Indeed, various circumstances in subsequent history show that
cii.vr. IV.
THE ROMANS. 121
wliatever was new at Rome was quickly communicated to this
distant province of the empire.
The Boman troops had now, indeed, been long- eng-aged in
building towns and in making roads ; and under their influence
the face of the country was undergoing a rapid and extraordin-
ary change. We have seen that, after some of the British
chiefs entered into relations with the Homans, a town or two
were built, such as Verulamium and Cainulodunum, in imita-
tion, probably, of those on the Continent, and differing entirely
from what had been called towns in the time of Caesar. We
have no means of ascertaining how many such towns were built,
and it is by an assumption without authority that writers have
betni accustomed to say that this or that Roman town was
built on the site of a ])revious town of the Britons. But under
the influence of Roman manners and refinements, cities and
towns soon rose up on all sides, and were joined together by an
immense system of military and other roads. The first indica-
tion of thes3 towns on any considerable extent is found in the
pages of Ptolemy, who has merely enumerated those which
were then of most account. We find that when he wrote
(about A.D. 120), Rutupise was already the principal port of
Kent, and the usual point of debarkation for visitors from the
('ontineut. Not very far from it was another principal town of
Kent, called Dai'vernum (Aapovtpyoy), no doubt a corruption
of Durovernum (Cauterdnn/). Londinium, which Ptolemy places
in Cantium, was already, in the time of Tacitus, known as a
great trading town. Within the district of the Regni of Surrey
v/as Noviomagus, which seems to have stood in the neighbour-
hood of Bromley, on the borders of Kent. In the ancient dis-
trict of the Belgse were three important towns, Yenta {TFiucJieH-
ter), Aquae Calidas {Bath), and Ischalis {Ilchester). The small
district of the Durotriges, in Dorset, possessed but one town
which Ptolemy thought worthy of notice, and of that his copy-
ists seem to have corrupted the name ; for it is probable that
what he calls Duniuui, was the same place called by later
writers Durnovaria {Dorchester). Further west, in the territory
of the Dumnonii, four towns are enumerated, one of which, Isca,
is kjiown to have occupied the site of the present Exeter, but
the other three, Yoliba, Uzela or Uxela, and Tamare, are less
certain, though they are supposed to have stood respectively,
the first on the river Fowey, the second in the neighbourhood
of Bridgewater, and the third on tlie Tamar. The two districts
to the north of the l>elg8e, those of the Attrebates and tlie
V
122 THE EOMAXS. [cuAr. iv.
Dobuni, liad each an important city, the first called Caleva
{S'dchester), the other, Coriniiun {Clrencedei') .
North of the Thames were the towns of Camulodiinum {Col-
cJieder), in Essex, and another, Venta (Caistoi), in the country
of the Iceni, in Norfolk. More westward lay Verulamium (St
Albans), and, to the north of this town, another called SalinK)
[liaXfjvui), the site of which is supposed to be Salndy, or Sandy,
near Biggleswade, in Bedfordshire. In the country of the Coritavi
were Lindum (L'mcohi), and Hagse, or, according to the in ore
correct reading, Ratse {Leicester). In the small coastclistrict to
the north of the Humber, which had been the territory of the
Barisii, there was a town called l)y Ptolemy, Petnaria, the site
of which is not certain. Some of the most important Eoman
towns in the island were now scattered over the once wild haunts
of the fierce Brigantes. Pirst of these was Eburacum (Joy/),
the head-quarters of the sixth legion. The others were Isnrium
{Aldborough), Caturactoniuni (Catterlc), OWvdwa {Ilklej/), all in
Yorkshire; Gralagum or Galacum, an uneertam site, but sup-
posed to be near Kendal, in Westmoreland ; Epiacum (Lanches-
ter), in Durham, Vinnovium {Blnchester), in the same county,
Kigodunum, believed to be the place subsequently called Coc-
cium, in Lancashire, and Camunlodununi, or, as later Avriters
call it, Cand)0(lununi (Slack), in Yorkshire. Ueva, the garrison
of the twentieth legion, occupied the site of the present city of
Chester. Below it stood Viroconium or Uriconium (TFroxeter),
in Shropshire ; Brannogeniuin (supposed to be near Leintward-
iiie), on the northern borders of Herefordshire ; and, more
westwardly, Mediolanium, a town on the banks of the Tanad, in
North Wales. Par down in the western part of Wales, in a
])art of Cardiganshire still rich in antiquities, was a town named
iiUentinura (Llanib) -, further south was Maridunum (Caermar-
then) ; and eastward again, in the borders of the Silures, was
lUdlseum, supposed to be the same town which is mentioned at
a later period under the name of Burrium ( Usk). By confound-
ing two names, Ptx)lemy has omitted the Silurian Isca (Caerleon) ,
wliich was the hepd-quarters of the second legion.
Since the caiu^^aigns of Agricola, the conquerors had covered
tlie lowlands of Scotland, as far as the borders of the great
(Caledonian forest, with an extraordinary number of towns and
stations on the sites of most of which the spade still brings to
light traces of Roman civilisation. Ptolemy enumerates no less
than twenty towns (TroAtic) to the north of the Brigantes, the
names of which wei'e Lucopibia (Whithern), and Retigonium
CHAP. IV.] TvOMAX TOWNS IX BRITAIX. 123
[Stranraer), in the district of the Novantac, on the extreme coasts
of Galloway ; Carbantorigiim {Kircudbright), Uxehiin, Corda,
and Trimontiiim, the three last of uncertain site, but believed to
have ranged across the district north of the head of Solway
Firth, as they were in the district of the Selgovse. The first
two have been supposed by some to be represented by entrench-
ments found at Raeburufoot, in Eskdale, and Birrenswork Hill,
in Annandale. The Roman Trimontium is supposed to be Eil-
don, in Lauderdale. The Roman towns in the extensive district
of the Damnii, who occupied the larger portion of the lowlands,
were Colania (Carstalrs), Vanduara {Paisley), Covin (imcei'taiti) ,
Alauna [Kier), \A\\(\.\\m{^yh'doch), and Victoria {Beat gin Boss).
In the district of the Otadeni were built Curia {Ciirrie), and
Bremenium {Rochester) ; in that of the Vacomagi,, bordering on
the district of the Caledonians, Banatia {Bonness), Tamia {Brae-
mar Castle), Pteroton Castrum {Burghhead), and Tuesis, a town
on the Spey, perhaps at Cromdale ; in that of the Yeiiicontes,
Orrea {Bertha at the head of the Tay) ; and among the Texali,
Devana {Old Aberdeen^.
The strength which was thus permanently established in the
north shows us to what a state of dependence the Romans had
now reduced all the southern parts of the island. Further evi-
dence of this is seen in the distribution of the Roman legions,
which had now been placed in the permanent quarters which
they held until nearly the moment of their final withdrawal.
The fourteenth legion, the one which had crushed the insurrec-
tion of Boadicea, had been drawn from Britain by Yitellius in
the year 70, and had never returned. Several of the others had
left at a still earlier period. Four only remained-=^the second,
sixth, ninth, and twentieth. Of these, the second was posted
at Isca {C:rleo7t), and the twentieth at Deva {Chester), whence
they held in restraint the mountaineers of Wales, and of Cum-
berland and Westmoreland, the retreat of such of the Brigantes
as still retained their wild independence, and protected the
country from the Irish pirates, who landed usually in the SeVern
and the Dee. The sixtli legion was established at York, from
whence it could be marched quickly into Scotland. After the last
campaign of Agricola, the ninth legion suddenly disappears, and
is no more heard of in history ; but as avc find it coiiuuemor-
ated in inscriptions found at York, it is supposed to have been
combined with, or incorporated into, the sixth. The north
of England and the lowlands of Scotland were thickly covered ^'
with posts of auxiliaries ; and we trace other bodies of auxili-
/
124 THE ROMANS. [chap. iv.
nries scattered in the towns of the south, but not in such
nuiribers as to lead us to believe that they were placed there as a
curb on the popuhition.
The Roman writers have, unfortunately, left us very few
notices of the internal affairs of our island after it was reduced
to a province ; and for many years subsequent to the departure
of Ag-ricola, Britain is hardly noticed. We are, probably, to
suppose from this, that it remained without any serious disturb-
ances, and that the progress of Eomanising and civilisino- went
on without interruption. We do not even know who succeeded
Agricola in the propraetorship, and we only learn incidentally
tliat the governor of this province, towards the end of the reign
of Domitian, was an officer named Sallustius Lucullus, whom
that tyrant caused to be put to death for having allowed a new-
foi'med spear he had invented to be called, after his own name,
Lucullian. But the frequent weakness of the central power,
and the various struggles for the empire, gradually enfeebled the
imperial power in the distant provinces, and threw them into
disorder. This was especially the case in Britain. During the
reduction and conquest of the lowland tribes, the fierce Cale-
donians had risen into so much importance, that their name be-
gan not only to be used for the collective tribes to the north of
the Brigantes, but it was adopted very often as a common term
fo-r the Britons in general — that is, for all those who had not
acknowledged themselves Roman subjects. They probably
carried on the same plan of warfare which was continued by
their descendants to a comparatively recent period. Rushing un-
expectedly from their strongholds in the mountains and forests,
they swept over the open country, plundering, slaughtering, and
burning, and disappeared with their booty before a sufficient
force could be brought together to encounter them. In such
warfare, wild tribes, who used to move about rapidly, with no
])ermanent residences or possessions, had great advantages over
a rich and civilized country, which it required a steady govern-
ment and active and skilful commanders to protect. These
seem to have been wanting during that period which preceded
the accession of Hadrian, and it is probable that the successes
of the Caledonians had encouraged some other British tribes to
revolt. The emperor Hadrian visited Britain in person in the
year 120, and he is said to have found many things that required
reformation. We have no account of his proceedings, but it ap-
pears that he restored the island to order, and that he di'ove
back the Caledonians into their fastnesses. We are justified in
CHAP. IV.] HADRIAN'S WALL. 125
believing that he marched in person into the northern wikls,
from the satirical verses of a contemporary poet,* and we learn
from direct testimony that he cansed that formidable barrier to
l>e built across the island from the Solway to the Tyne, of which
we still trace the stupendous remains ; a massive wall, nearly
seventy miles in extent, extending over plain and mountain,
from Bowness on the Solway Firth to the now celebrated locality
of Wall's End on the Tyne, accompanied on its southern side
by an earthen vallum and a deep ditch, and fortified with a
formidable series of twenty-three stationary towns, with inter-
mediate mile-castles and watch-towers. It has been the custom
to consider the wjdl only as the structure raised by Hadrian,
while the earthen vallum or rampart was ascribed to Severus ;
but I entirely agree with Mr Collingvvood Bruce, who has re-
cently published a most interesting volume on ' The Roman
Wall,' that both are parts of one work, erected by the former
emperor.
This immense work seems to have been part of a system of
circumvallation adopted by tlie emperor Hadrian, for it appears
that remains of similar w^alls are found on the distant frontiers
in Germany. I suspect it has been rather hastily supposed that it
implies that this emperor relinquished the territory between it
and the more northerly line of forts erected by Agricola; for the
towns and forts to the north of the wall seem still to have been
kept up, and to have been continued till the decline of the em-
pire. Perhaps it was intended to protect the richer and more
highly cultivated country to the south of the ' lower isthmus'
I'rom the sudden and destructive inroads to which it had previ-
ously been exposed. We know from the history of the border,"
at a later period, how far, without a barrier of this kind, the
ravages of the Scots might be carried, and wdiat damage might
be effected before a surticient force could be gathered on any
particular point to drive tlieni back.
* The historian Sfartianiis has preserved the epigram written on
Hadrian by the poet Florus, as well as the enipei'or's reply. The first was
foutaiued in the three lines :
Eg'o nolo Caesar esse,
Ambuhire per Britannos,
Scythicas pati pruinas.
To which the emperor replied as follows : —
Eg;o nolo Florus esse,
Ambulare per tabernas,
Latitare per popinas,
Calices pati rotundos.
126 THE llOMAXS. [chap. iv.
The expedition of Hndrian seems to liave been followed by a
period of profound tranquillity,* and we learn from the historian
Xiphilinus, that, about twelve years afterwards, the propi-setor,
or, as he was then called, the lei>;ate of Britain, named Julius
Severus, Avas able to carry away some of his best otticers and
troops to assist in the war against the revolted Jews. The
name of another propreetor under Hadrian, perhaps the suc-
cessor of Julius Severus, Priscus Liciuius, has been found in
inscriptions, but nothing further is known of him.
Hadrian was succeeded, in the year 138, by the emperor
Antoninus Pius. His propraetor iu Britain, Lollius Urbicus,
was a man of energy and talent, which he was soon called to
exercise in withstanding a new irruption of the northern bar-
barians. We learn, quite incidentally, of an insurrection to the
south of Hadrian's wall, at this period. f The remains of the
Brigantes seem to have preserved a precarious independence.
/ perhaps in the rugged country extending from the wilds of
/ Lancashire over the lake district, in the same manner as wild
Irish clans occupied the Wicklow mountains for ages after the
surrounding plains had acknowledged the domination of the
Anglo-Normans, and these probably imitated the northern
(Caledonians in making occasional predatory outbreaks. On
the present occasion these had attacked a small tribe living under
Koman subjection, called the Genuni, to which they had per-
haps been encouraged by the invasion of the Caledonians
beyond the wall. The Brigantes were quickly overwhelmed,
and we are told that the greater part of the tribe was destroyed.
The Homan arms were equally successful against the Caledo-
nians, who were driven into their mountains, and Lollius Urbi-
cus caused a new barrier to be raised for their restraint. We
have seen how, when Agricola had reduced the lowland districts
to subjection, he erected a line of forts across what has been
termed the upper isthmus, from the Forth to the Clyde. Lol-
(lius iJrbicus raised, on the same site, a new line of forts, and
joined them together by an immense continuous rampart, of
eai'th and turf, which from the name of the emperor under
* The expedition of Hadrian to Britain was commemorated by several
coins in large and middle brass, which are interesting, because some of
them give on the reverse a figure seated with a spear and shield, which,
as it is surrounded by the word brittannia, is supposed to have been
intended for a personification of Britain. These coins, especially the large
bi'ass, are rare:
f This insurrection and destruction of the Brigantes is mentioned by
Pausanias, Arcad. lib. viii. cap. 43.
CHAP. IV.] LOLLIUS URBICUS. 12;
whom it was l)uilt, is usually called tlie wall of Antoninus.
It is now called popularly Graham's Dike, and alono- its course
are frequently found inscribed tablets commemorating- the poi-
tion built by the different troops and cohorts of the Romai
army.* We learn from these inscriptions that, besides the
numerous bodies of foreign auxiliaries which were permanently
stationed in the north, the three legions in Britain, the second,
the sixth, and the twentieth, were all drawn from their quarters
to take part in the campaign of LoUius Urbicus, His successes
threw splendour on the reign of Antoninus, and coins were
struck bearing on the reverse a figure of Victory surrounded by
the letters of the word Britannia.
In spite of the ene^'getic measures of Urbicus, the Caledo-
nians soon reappeared in arms, and the circumstance that they
seem almost always to have risen on the death of the emperoi-,
shows that the barbarians must have had intelligence among
their enemies. They calculated, no doubt, that, amid the hesi-
tating inactivity which naturally followed such an event, they
might make an extensive raid with less danger of interruption.
The Roman province was thus invaded on the accession of
Marcus Aurelius, in 161, but the invaders Avere checked by a
new propraetor, Aufidius Victorinus. An invasion of a still
more formidable character followed the accession of Commodus ;
a Homan commander, who attempted to arrest their progress,
was killed, and his army cut to pieces ; and the emperor was
obliged to send an officer who was remarkable for his extraordin-
ary perseverance and capability of sustaining the hardships of
war, named Ulpius Marcellus, to support the authority of Rome
in this distant province. From this man the Caledonians met
with terrible reverses, and the island Avas again restored to
peace. Ulpius Marcellus was, however, soon recalled, for, in
1 the eyes of a tyrant like Commodus, merit itself was a crime.
His departure was followed by a mutiny among the troops in
Britain, arising from dissatisfaction at the proceedings of the
imperial favourite Perenius, who displaced the men of senato-
rial rank from the commands which they had always held, and
* The following:, from a richly sculptured stone found iit West Kilpa-
trick, is the usual fornmla of these inscriptions ;
IMP. C. T. AE. HADKIANO ANTONINO AUG. PIO P.P. VEX. LEG. XX. V. V.
F. P. P. nil CDXI.
To the emperor Cmsar Titus ^iius Hadrianus Antoninus Augustm Fins,
t he father of his country. A vexillation of the twentieth legion, {sur-
named) the valiant and victorious, executed four thousand four hundred
and eleven paces.
)
128 THE llOMAXS. [ciiAr. iv.
iippoiiited ill tlieir stead youiifi'er men taken from the equestrian
order. The officers in Britain met and consulted, and they
finally sent an armed deputation of fifteen hundred men to lay
their grievances at the foot of the throne. When they arrived
at the gates of Rome, Commodus went out to meet them, and,
aware that there was discontent among his other troops, and
that it mrght be dangerous to provoke them, he abandoned his
minister to his accusers, and they put him to death. Still the
troops in Britain remained unsatisfied, and the mutiny con-
tinued, on which Publius Helvius Pertinax, a commander of great
military talent, was sent to appease them ; but instead of return-
ing to their obedience, they disclaimed the authority of Commo-
dus, and invited their new commander to be their emperor.
This he prudently declined, and he succeeded in restoring order
in the province, though not without considerable personal risk,
for, in opposing himself to the fury of one of the mutinous
legions, he was struck down, and left for dead.
At length Pertinax obtained his recall, and was succeeded in
the proprsetorship by Decimus Clodius Albinus. This governor
soon made himself popular in his government, especially among
the troops, and he seems even to have retained the favour of
the emperor Commodus, who conferred upon him the title of
Ctesar. At length an unfortunate accident had nearly proved
his ruin. It was reported that Commodus was dead, and this
rumour quickly reaching Britain, Albinus assembled his troops,
and addressed them on the event. He used some expressions
in his speech which, being repeated before the emperor, gave so
much displeasure, that an order was immediately despatched
for the recall of the propraetor, and a creature of Commodus,
named Junius Severus, was appointed to succeed him. But
the murder of Commodus, before the order could be carried in-
to execution, saved Albinus for a more glorious, if not for a
liappier fate.
The imperial throne was now occupied for a moment by the
same Pertinax who had preceded Albinus in the government of
Britain. He was raised to the purple by the praetorian guards,
who, three months afterwards, rebelled and cut off his head, and
then offered the empire for sale. The disgraceful purchase was
made by a rich but worthless merchant, named Didius Julianus.
Three commanders, in different parts of the empire, stepped
forward at this moment to resist the tyranny of the pi'aetorian
soldiery, and expel the, emperor of their choice; these were,
Severus in Pannodia, Pescennius Niger in Syria, and Albinua
CHAP. IV.] THE EMrEllOR SKVERUS. 12^
ill Britain. Severiis, witli liis cliaracteristic activity, was tlu;
first in tiie field, and, inarcliinu; upon Rome, put to death tin;
usui'per, deoTaded the pra^toiiaii guards from their privilej^-es,
and assumed the purple. Severus was a man possessing extra-
ordinary talents for empire, indefatigable in pursuing the object
of his ambition, unscrupulous in attaining the object of it, and
merciless towards those who stood in his way. He had gained
possession of the empire, but he had still two competitors in
the Held, against whose united forces he Avould perhaps have
been unable to struggle. It was his policy therefore to sepai'ate
his rivals, and while he prepared to march against Niger, he
pacified Albinus with professions of the warmest friendship,
conferred upon him the title of Caesar, and, making him nomi-
nally his associate in the empire, caused money to be coined in
his name, and statues to be erected in his honour. Albinus
thus gained over, Severus proceeded to the east to encounter
Pescenniiis Niger.
This occurred in the year 193. Niger was defeated in batthj
near Antioch, and slain, and after a protracted struggle, Severus
returned victorious to Rome in 196, and prepared to rid him-
self of his other rival Albinus. The governor of Britain was a
formidable antagonist ; he also was a man of great military ta-
lents ; he was popular in his ])rovince as well as in Gaid, and .
he was closely allied by blood and friendship with some of the s/
greatest and oldest families in Rome. He was ambitious, too,
and, though his vanity had been flattered by the honours showered
on him by Severus, he seems to have let it be known that he
was not yet satisfied, Ind that he aimed at securing for himself
tlie imperial dignity. • We are told that, during the absence of
Severus in the east, Albinus had been invited to Rome to as-
sume the purple, and that it was the knowledge of these in-
trigues which deternuned the emperor Severus to destroy him.
This was not, however, an easy task. It is evident tliat the
Roman province of Britain had become at this time extremely
populous and rich. Multitudes of auxiliary troops had been
gradually transplanted into it, and had no doubt taken with
them or been followed by colonies of their countrymen. Mer-
chants, tradesmen, artisans, even probably artists, and men of
letters, had sought their fortune where the increase of commerce
and civilisation opened a field for their exertions. The strength
of the native Britons had been drawn off to serve in foreign
countries ; * and that part of the original population which i-e-
* It was the constant policy of the Romans to draught ofif the rising
>/
130 THE ROMANS. [cHAr. iv.
luained at home had probably been f>-reatly diminished in nnm-
bers, and reduced to tlie condition of serfs. In fact, from this
time forward, when the Roman writers speak of tlie Britons who
existed in the island as a people, they include under that
name only the Caledonian tribes of the north. Britain Avas
thus looked upon as one of the most powerful and important
pi'ovinces of the empire ; and its propraetor, surrounded by
troops devoted to his person, with a population which seems to
have been always ambitious of an independent emperor of its
own, mig-ht easily set the court of Rome at defiance. Severns,
therefore, aware of all these circumstances, determined to de-
stroy his opponent by treachery, and he wrote him a letter in
terms of the most affectionate friendship, which was entrusted
to messenf^ers in whom he could confide for the execution of his
secret orders. These were, that they should endeavour to ob-
tain a private interview with Albinus, and if they succeeded
they were instantly to slay him ; if they were not adnutted to a
private interview, they were to insinuate themselves among- his
cooks and with the servants who waited at his table, and by
bribing- them, convey a deadly poison, which the emperor had
g-iven them for that purpose, into his food. It happened that
Albinus and his officers were well aware of the treacherous
character of Severus, and that they were on their guard. His
messengers had no sooner arrived in Britain, than they were
seized, and so strictly examined, that they made a full confes-
sion. They w^ere at once ordered for execution, and Albinus,
conscious that now his only chance of safety was immediate
action, caused himself to be proclaimed emperor, and declared
war against Severus. He marched into Gaul, and took posses-
sion of the city of Lyons, near which was fought the decisive
population of the conquered provinces, and send them to occupy stations ;
and, in fact, to form c(>k)nies in other countries. It was, indeed, the most
effectual manner of destroying; the nationality of the people they had suh-
jecced to their power ; for, holding no natural sympathy with the land in
which they were settled, and regarded only as Roman soldiers, they gradu-
ally came to consider themselves as a part of Rome. We find, mentioned
in old writers and in inscriptions, numerous nice and cohorts of Britons in
various parts of the Roman empire. According to the Notitia, the fourth
ala of Britons was stationed in Egypt. The tiventy-sixth cohort of
Britons occurs in Armenia. A body of the ' Invincible Younger Britons '
were stationed in Spain ; and one of the ' Elder Britons ' in Illyricuni.
The ' Younger British Slingers {exculcatores) ' are found among the Pala-
tine auxiliaries. Other bodies of Britons are found in Gaul, Italy, and
other countries. Britons of tlie tribe of the Horesti (in Scotland) have
been traced by Mr Roach Smith on the banks of the Rhine. See his
' Collectanea Antiqua,' vol. ii. p. 134.
CHAP. IV.] BATTLE OF LYONS. 131
battle which secured the empire to Severus, and put an end to
the ambitious projects of Albinus by his death. The power of
the province of Britain was exhibited in the numerous and
excellent army which its g-overnor led into ihe field. The
ancient liistorian from whom we obtain tlie most detailed ac-
count of these events, Xiphilinus, estimates his force at a hun-
dred and fifty thousaiul men, part of whom probably were Gauls ;
and, if we suppose this to be exag-g-erated, it is certain that his
soldiers were sufficiently numerous and brave, to leave the event
long doubtful in a contest with the military force of the empire
under the command of the emperor himself.
The great battle of Lyons was fought on the 19th of Feb-
ruary, 197. It appears probable that the victor immediately
appointed to the government of Britain one of his commanders
who had served in the campaign against Albinus, named Virius
Lupus, who perhaps led back the shattered remains of the
British legions. At all events, we find this officer established
there as proprsetor very soon afterwards. At this period some
great change was taking place in the population of North Britain,
which we have a difficulty in explaining, though it is su])posed
to have arisen from a large immigration of foreign tribes, per-
haps from the north of Europe. The slight notices of events in
Britain given by the Eoman writers throw no light upon the
subject, further than showing us that the Caledonian tribes had
suddenly become much more numerous and formidable, and that
apparently a new tribe under the name of Maeatae had established \/
themselves immediately to the north of the barrier of Antoninus. ^
Dion Cassius, the historian of these events, informs us that ' the
two greatest tribes among the Britons are the Caledonii and the
Mseatse, Ibr even the names of all the other tribes have in a
manner merged in these two. The Mseatse dwell close to the
wall which divides the island into two parts, and the Caledonii
live beyond them. Each of these people inhabit wild mountains,
where there is no water, and desert plains and marshes, where
they live without walls or cities ; neither do they practise hus-
bandry, but live by pasturage, or the chace, and on berries
which grow in the woods ; for they never taste fish, although
their lakes and rivers furnish an inexhaustible supply.* They
live in tents, naked and barefooted, having their wives in '
* It is a curious circumstance, that the apparently superstitious aversion .
to the eating of tish was pieserved in Scuthmd to a very recent period; "'^
and 1 am not sure it' it does not still to some degree exist in the High-
lands.
K
13'2 THE ROMANS. [chap. it.
common, aiul lliey rear all the cliildren which are born to them.
The government of these tribes is democratic, and they delight
above all tilings in pillage. They tight from chariots, which are
drawn by small swift horses ; they fight also on foot, run with
great speed, and are most resolute when compelled to stand.
Their arms consist of a shield and a short spear, which has a
brazen knob at the extremity of the shaft, that when shaken it
may terrify the enemy by its noise. They use daggers also.
They are capable of enduring hunger, thirst, and hardships of
every description ; for they will plunge into the marshes, and
remain there several days, with only their heads above the water.
When they are in the woods they subsist on bark and roots ;
and they prepare for all emergencies a certain kind of food, of
which if they eat only so much as the size of a bean, they neither
hunger nor thirst.'
Such were the northern tribes, as report, probably applying
the description of those who were in the lowest state of civilisa-
tion to the whole, pictured them at Eoine. We have before
had occasion to observe that the Caledonians appear to have
had quick intelligence of the condition of the southern province,
and they seem, according to the same policy which led their
descendants at a much more recent period to select the moment
when the Edwards and Henries were absent in their Pi-ench
wars, to make their most formidable inroads into England, to
have chosen the moment of the insurrection of Albinus, and of
the troubles and weakness which followed, to invade the Roman
province. The history of these invasions is extremely obscure.
It appears to have been the Mtratse who conducted theni, and
the sudden turbulence of this people, their strength and their
position, certainly give force to the opinion that they were a
new colony from Scandinavia or from the north of Germany.
Virius Lupus was at length induced to adopt the dangerous ex-
pedient of purchasing peace with the Mseatae, who received the
money, and then, entering into an alliance with the Caledonians,
renewed their hostilities. The propraetor gave tliem more gold,
and they remained quiet during two years, and then in conjunc-
tion with their allies recommenced their predatory excursions
with more ferocity than ever. At length, in the year 208,
A^irius Lupus was so much embarrassed by the attacks of these
northern enemies, that he sent an urgent message to the emperor
Severus, praying for a considerable reinforcement of troops, and
representing the advantage which would arise from the presence
of the emperor himself.
CHAP. IV.] SEYERUS IN BRITAIN. 133
Severus had found little happiness in the gratification of his
ambition ; the severity of his rule on one hand, and the weak
indulgence he displayed towards his own family, had raised him
troubles both abroad, where he was annoyed by frequent insur-
rections, and in his own household, where his domestic hours
were ernl)ittered by the undutiful and even cruel conduct of his
sons Caracalla and Geta. He was not unwilling, therefore, to
change his domestic torments even for the hardships of a cam-
paign in the inclement north, although age, now advancing upon
him, was rendered more burthensome by the attacks of a cruel
disease. When the letter of Virius Lupus arrived, announcing
that the Roman province was overrun by the northem plunder-
ers, the sound of war seemed to stir up the spirit of the old
veteran, as if he had suddenly recovered his youthful energies.
He instantly assembled his army and placed himself at its head,
and, ordering his sons to accompany him, he made a forced
march through G-aul, stopping nowhere, although the painful
disease of his joints, with which he was habitually afflicted, was
at this time so severe, that he was obliged to be carried on a
litter. He thus reached the shores of Britain in an incredibly ,
short space of time. It was late in the year 208, yet, without j
a moment's delay, he drew too-ether the armies from different )
parts, and, with those he had brought with him, concentrated a |
vast force, and marched at once to meet the enemy. The latter /
were astonished at the rapidity of his movements, and quickly |^
ceasing their hostilities, they sent envoys, who met him perhaps
at Eburacum {York), begging for peace, and offering to make
amends for their previous offences. But Severus had come too
far to be so easily satisfied, and he was resolved to deprive them
of the power of further hostility. He detained their ambassa-
dors for some time, and then sent them away without any
answer to their demands.
The emperor established his court at Eburacum, the second
city of the island, and the station of the sixth legion. He
there made extensive preparations for the war, and at the begin-
ning of the year 209 he put his forces in motion. He found it
necessary to separate his two sons, Avho not only treated their
father with insolent disrespect, but quarrelled with each other.
Geta was left to command the southern province, assisted by a
council of the oldest and most experienced of the emperor's
friends, while Caracalla accompanied him into the wilds of
Caledonia. They had no sooner passed the boundary formed
by the Forth ancl Clyde, and the wall of Antoninus (ra irpoi^ip-
134 THE ROMANS. [chap. iv.
XrjjJU'a pEv^aTct rt Kcil ^wfjara rfjc 'Pw^ota;)' dp-^ijc), than
they were involved in daily skirmislies with the barbar ans, who
only showed themselves in small botlies, and manifested a reso-
lution to avoid a g-eneral eng-agement. The Eomans had to
nndergco extraordinary hardships, for as they drove the enemy
before them they were oblig-ed to force their Avay through thick
forests and immense morasses, with a climate to tlie asperity of
which they were imaccustomed. But everything seemed to
yield to the stern will of their extraordinary leader, who, in the
midst of the most incredible difficulties and hardships, canstd
bridges and roads to be thrown over the marshy places, actually
filling some of them up, so as to give his troops a solid footing ;
while he cut down forests, and made roads over the mountains.
In the course of these labours the Koman soldiers frequently
fell into ambuscades of the natives, who exposed sheep and
oxen a little way out of the line of their march, and then fell
upon them suddenly when they went to carry away the booty.
So certain were they that all stragglers. would be killed without
mercy, and probably subjected to horrible indignities, that
whenever a soldier was rendered unable to keep up with the
march of his comrades, we are told that they put him to death,
rather than let him fall alive into the hands of their enemies.
We are assured by the old writers, that the Komans lost not
less than fifty thousand men in this invasion. Yet neither
marsh nor forest, rain nor storm, of Avhicli there seems to have
been no lack, averted the inflexible will of the aged emperor,
who, sometimes on horseback, but more freqnently stretched on
his litter, which he was not able to leave for days together, con-
tinued to advance nntil he reached the extreme northern coast
of Bi'itain. He there observed the parallax of the sun, and the
comparative length of the days and nights, and he ascertained
beyond a doubt that Britain was an island. Severus was now
willing to treat with the Caledonians, against whom his opera-
tions had often been hindered and embarrassed by the untilial
behaviour of Caracalla. At times when the old man was unable
to leave his bed, he tried to persuade his son to take the com-
mand of the troops, and march against the barbarians. But
Caracalla only occupied himself in corrupting the soldiers, in
order that, in case of his father's death, he might use them
against his brother Geta, and obtain the empire entirely for
himself. He was even impatient of the lingering duration of
his father's life, and is said to have attempted to bribe his phy-
sicians and servants to hasten his death. When he found the
CHAP. IV.] SEVERUS IX CALEDONIA. 135
old kin2,-'s attendants too faithful to listen to his proposals, he
resolved to slay hiin himself. One day Severus, having had the
soles of his feet punctured, had thus obtained so much relief
from his complaint, that he was enabled to ride on horseback.
He left the camp with his son and a detachment of his forces,
to receive a surrender of arms from the Caledonians and to
confer with them on terms of peace. The emperor rode for-
ward towards the enemy, with his son behind him, and the
troops following in the rear. At this moment Caracalla sud-
derdy checked his horse, and, drawing his sw^ord, prepared to
stab his father in the back ; but the troops, who saw the
treacherous movement, set up a shout, which made the emperor
turn round, and thus saved his life. Severus had seen the drawn
sword, but, without appearing to take any further notice, he
proceeded in his negotiation with the Caledonians. When this
was concluded, he retired to his tent, and seiuling for his son,
reproached him with his murderous intentions in the presence
of two of his confidential friends, Papinian, the celebrated
lawyer, and Castor. Provoked at the conduct of his children,
Severus hastened the treaty with the Caletlonians, and it was
agreed that they sliould give up a considerable portion of their
territory to the Romans, on condition that he should retire with
his army into the Roman province. He accordingly returned
to York, it is supposed towards the end of the year 209. It has
been popularly supposed that the following year was employed
in the construction of that immense line of fortification which
recent examinations and a careful consideration of ancient testi-
monies have left little doubt was the sole w^ork of the emperor
Hadrian. It is not, indeed, probable that, after having added
to the Roman territory towards the north, a man like Severus
would raise a barrier on the limits to which the Roman power
had been confined, when almost at its lowest ebb.*
It is possible, however, that Severus may have repaired the
wall, and it seems that, during his stay at Eburacum, he not
unfrequently visited its towns and garrisons. We are told that
on one of these visits to the wall, he was returning to the near-
est station (mansio), when he was accosted by an ' Ethiopian '
soldier, celebrated among his comrades for his wit,f who bore
* We owe the account of the Caledonian campaigns of Severus chiefly
to the historian Herodian, who wrote about thirty years after they took
place. Some particulars are added by a later writer, Xiphilinus.
t /Ethiops quidaiii e nuinero militari, clarte inter scurras famse, et cele-
bratorum semper j<jcov\im.—^Eli us Spartianus, de Vit. ISever. c. 22.
136 ~ THE ROM AX?. [chap. iv.
a crown of cypress, niid who, wlicii the empei-or seemed od'eiided
bv what he looked upon as an ill omen, addressed him in a tone
of vulg-ar adulation, ' You have been evervthlng, and conquered
everythino-; noAV then be a god.'* Other fatal omens accom-
panied the em])eror's progress, one of which occurred atEbnra-
cum, when on his return thither he went to offer saci-itice in
the temple of Bellona. While he was there, confiding in the
solemn promises of the northern bai-barians to preserve the
peace, news suddenly arrived that the Mseata3 had again united
with the Caledonians, and that they had recommenced their
/ predatory inroads. The emperor w^as fnrious at the faithlessness
I of the barbarians, and raising himself up, to order his officers
to prepare for a new campaign, he addressed them in the words
of Homer —
'Vciw fit'} Ti? vTTf.Kfpityoi aiTrvv oXtQpnv
ILovpou kovTa cpipui, /jlijS' cis tpuyoi aiirvi/ oAttipoi'.
which is translated by Cowper —
Die the race !
May none escape us ! Neither he who flies,
Nor even the infant in the mother's womb
Unconscious.
But Severus was sinking rapidly under his bodily infirmities,
and he Avas at this moment suffering nnder so severe an attack
of liis disease, that he w^as nnable to "walk or ride. The troops,
murmuring at his absence, and agitated by the intrigues of his
worthless son, saluted Caracalla with the imperial title of
Augustus. When this was told to Severus, all the energies of
the w^arrior were roused, and, causing himself to be placed on
the tribunal, he commanded the new emperor, Caracalla, with
all w^ho liad joined in the act of insubordination, wdiether tri-
bunes, centurions, or private soldiers, to appear before him.
Then suddenly acklressing tlieni, he said, ' Soldiers, it is not the
feet, but the head, which discharges the duties of a general ; '
and in the same breath he gave the order to march against the
enemy. But the old man's effort was fatal to him. He relaps-
ed into a state of helpless weakness, was carried back to his
palace, and died in Eburacum, or York, on the 4th of February,
* We have not much difficulty in fixing the scene of this anecdote. A
detachment of Moors was, as we learn from the ' Notitia Imperii,' stationed
at Aballaba ( JVatch-cross ?), which was no doubt the town where the em-
peror on this occasion sought a lodging.
CHAP. IV.] THE EMPEROR CARACALLA. 137
211. By his will, his two sons, Caracalla and Geta, Avere to
share between thein his enormous treasures and the Eoman
empire.
Caracalla, eag'er to secure the grand object of his ambition,
and to possess alone his father's empire and his treasures, seems
to have kept the real state of the health of Severus from the
knowledge of his mother and brother until his death. He then
caused most of the officers of his father's household to be put
to death, and tried to corrupt the army ; but they remained
faithful, and insisted on acknowledging the two brothers as
equal, according to their father's will. Failing in his attempt
upon the soldiery, Caracalla made a hurried peace Avith the
barbarians, and, pretending to acquiesce in the will of Severus,
he hastened to tlie south to join his brother and mother. The
body of the late emperor Avas consumed on a funeral pile at
York, and the ashes having been placed in an urn of alabaster,
they carried it with them to Eome.
Such were the events which have given a classic celebrity to \
the city of York. A long period passed over, and many em- \
perors sat on the throne, before Britain is again mentioned in
the ancient historians. The government seems to have been
carried on with a silent tranquillity, which leaves us to suppose
that the island prospered, and that it was visited by no great
dangers or troubles to excite attention at Home. In fact, the
next great events that we shall have to contemplate are not over-
whelming attacks of the barbarians, but revolts of the island
ngainst the imperial government, Tavo or three inscriptions
found in different parts of England refer distinctly to this period,
and as they belong principally to dedications and restorations
of buildings, they seem to confirm the supposition that the is-
land remained in peace. One of these, raised by the troop of
Asturians stationed at Cilurimm on the Wall (C/iesters), relates
to the rebuihling of a temple, and shoAvs us not only that in
221, under the reign of Heliogabalus, Marius Valerianus Avas
l)ropra)tor of Britain, but that the troops and people in this dis-
tant province took so much interest in the revolutions at Rome,
that no sooner had Heliogabalus been deposed and assassinated,
than his name Avas erased from the inscription, in this remote
and comparatively obscure toAvn. iVnother inscription, foimd
in CunUjerland, shows that the propraetor of the emperor Gor-
dian, in the year 243, Avas Nonnius Philippus.
Amid the disorder and anarchy of the reign of Gallienus (260
to 268). a number of usurpers arose in different parts of the
-h
138 THE ROMANS. [ch.ip. iv.
empire, who were popularly called the thirty tyrants, of whom
Lollianus, Victorimis, Postumus, tlie two Tetrici, and Marius,
are believed on g'ood grounds to have assumed the sovereignty
in Britain. Perhaps some of these rose up as rivals at the same
time, and from the monuments bearing the name of Tetricus,
found at Bittern, near Southampton, we are perhaps justified in
supposing that the head-quarters of that commander lay at the
station of Clausentum and along the neighbouring coasts. We
have no information of the state of Britain at this time, but it
must have been profoundly agitated by these conflicting claim-
ants to empire. Yet, though so ready to rise in support of their
own leaders, the troops in Britain seem to have turned a deaf
ear to all solicitations from without. When an ofhcer in the
Homan army, named Bonosus, born in Spain, but descended of
a family in Britain, proclaimed himself emperor, in the reign of
Aurelian, and appealed for support to the western provinces, he
found no sympathy among the British troops. Another usurper,
whose name has not been recorded, had taken advantage of his
appointment to the government of tbe island by the emperor
Probus to assume the purple. The frequency of such usurpa-
tions within the island seem to show a desire among the in-
habitants to erect tliemselves into an independent sovereignty.
We are told that a favourite courtier of Probus, named Yic-
torinus Maurusins, had recommended this usurper to the pro-
prietorship, and that, when reproached on this account by the
emperor, Victorinus demanded permission to visit Britain.
When he arrived there, he hastened to the propraetor, and sought
his protection as a victim who had narrowly escaped from the
tyranny of the emperor. The new sovereign of Britain received
him with the greatest kindness, and in return was murdered in
the niglit by his guest. Victorinus returned to Rome to give
the emperor this convincing proof of his ' loyalty.' Probus
was succeeded in the empire by Cams, and he was followed by
Dioclesian, who began his reign in the year 2,84, and who soon
associated witli himself in the empire the joint emperor Max-
imian. Their reign, as far as regards Britain, was rendered
remarkable chiefly by the successful usurpation of Carausius.
About this time another great change was taking place among
the independent tribes in the north, the particulars of which are
lost in tlie obscurity of history. It is supposed that the Dal-
readic colony, under a leader wiiom tradition in the time of Bede
named Keuthi, now passed over from Ireland into the wilds of
Lorn and Kintire, and laid the foundation of that people who
CHAP. IV.] CARAUSIUS. 139
ultimately gave to the whole of North Britain the name of Scot-
land. It is certain that, after the period of which we are now
speaking, we lose sight of the old name of Caledonians, and even
of the more recent one of Mfsatse, and in their place appear those
of Picts and Scots, with a tribe which was apparently of older
date, and which now gained notoriety for its savage fei-ocity, the
Attacotti. At the same time the eastern "and south-eastern
coasts of Britainbegan to be infested with the predatory incursions
of the Saxon seafarers from the mouth of the Elbe. To oppose
these it was found necessary not only to erect a series of for-
tresses along the coast, but to establish and keep up a strong
Heet in the channel, which had its places of rendezvous at Grcs-
soriacum {Boulogne), and in the ports on the coasts of Kent,
Sussex, and Hampshire.* Among the officers of this fleet who
distinguished themselves most against the enemy, was a Mena-
pian of low birth, probably of the Batavian tribe of the Menapii,
named Carausius, whose talents soon caused him to be singled
out from his fellow-soldiers, and he was eventually appointed to
the command of the whole fleet. His ambition seems now to
have been flxed on a higher aim, and he appears to have formed
leagues and alliances, the object of which could hardly be mis-
luiderstood. He showed his military and naval skill in his fre-
quent victories over the German pirates ; but information was
carried to the emperors that the plunder which he recaptured
from the barbarians Avas seldom restored to those from whom it
had been flrst taken, and it was even intimated, that instead of
preventing the attacks of the enemy, he always contrived to let
them flrst load themselves with plunder, and then attacked them
and deprived them of their prey. By these or other means
^ Carausius collected enormous wealth, which also was reported
to Maximian, who sent orders to put the commander of the
British fleet to death. Carausius was soon informed of the em-
peror's intentions, and became aware that he had only one chance
of safety. He seems to have been extremely popidar among the
soldiery both on land and in the fleet ; his great wealth gave J
liim the means of attaching the mercenary to his fortunes ; and,
making use of both these advantages, he entered into an alliance
with the Franks, on whose borders he seems to have been born,
* The British fleet is mentioned in an inscription found at Lymne, thn
Fort as LemaNi's, one of the Roman ports on the southern coast ; it is the
dedication of an altar, probably to Neptune, by Aufidius Pantera, prajfoct
of the British fleet . . , . iv . . . aram .... avfiuiv pantera praefect
CLAS. BRIT.
a40 the ROMAXS. [chap. iv.
niui witli other German tril)es, seized tlie great naval station of
(iessoriacnni, and proclaimed himself one of the emperors of
Jiome. Embarrassino- revolts in other parts of the empire en-
coiirao-ed him in his desia'Ti.
Having thus proclaimed himself the equal and colleague of
Dioclesian and. Maximian, the talents of Carausius enabled him
to retain his usurped sovereignty during a period of seven years.
History has left us no account of the manner in vi^hich his
government Avas carried on, but he was evidently a man of very
extraordinary abilities, for it is said that, during this period, he
not only set the poAver of Eome at detiance, but that he protected
his subjects from the Saxons, and that he compelled the bar-
barians of the north to keep within the limits of their woods
and marshes. One of the most extraordinary characteristics of
the short reign of Carausius is the number and variety of his
coinage. Upwards of three hundred ditferent types are known,
and there can be little doubt that there are many othei's yet
luiknown. These authentic monuments throw some liy-ht on
his character and history, and we have every reason to hope,
that, in the hands of a skilful antiquary, they will some day be
rendered still more available.* Of the great variety of reverses
found on these coins, many, no doubt, refer to historical events.
One of these, with the legend expectate veni, is supposed to
have been struck on his arrival in Britain, after having assumed
the imperial title at Gessoriacum ; the tigure beneath the
inscription represents the genius of Britain, with a trident in her
hand, welcoming the new emperor. A number of coins having
such inscriptions as adventvs caeaysi, adventvs avgvsti,
&c., with others inscribed victokia avgvsti, and viiiTVS
avgvsti, seem to have been struck on his return from success-
ful expeditions against his enemies. One, with a tigure of a
trophy between two captives, and the inscription victoria gee,
perhaps commemorated some exploit on the coast of Germany.
His care to conciliate the troops is shoAvn not only in coins with
the inscriptions concordia militvm and eides militvm, but
in others struck in honour of each particular legion. The
second legion, with its badge the capi'icorn, and the twentieth,
with its badge the boar, are thus commemorated, as well as
* The antiquary Stukeley published a ' Medallic History of Carausius,'
which, although it displays too much of that writer's hasty speculations
and conclusions, shows us with how much advantag:e the coins might be
made to illustrate the history. My friend Mr Roach Smith has announced
a work on the coins of Carausius and Allectus, which we may be sure will
be a valuable addition to the early history of this island.
CHAP, IV.]
C.VRAUSIUS.
141
several leii'ions or parts of le<i;ions stationed in Gaul, which no
doubt took part with the usurper. Other inscriptions, such as
VBERTAS AVG, AEQVITAS AVG, FORTVNA AVG, FELICITAS AVG,
HTLARITAS AVG, LAETITIA AVG, PAX AVG, PIIOVIDENTIA AVG,
RESTITVT SAECVLI, SAECYLI FELICITAS, TEMPORVM FELICITAS,
no donl)t were intended to proclaim the prosperity and happiness
of the province under the rule of Carausius. When embarrass-
ments in other parts of the empire oblig'ed Maximian to leave
iiiin for a while to the enjoyment of his assumed dignity, and
even, it is said, to ag'ree to a treaty of friendship with him,
Carausius proclaimed himself an associate in the empire by
coins with inscriptions such as caravsivs et fratres svi
(round the three heads of Carausius, Dioclesian, andMaximian),
PAX AVGGG, SALVS AVGGG, PIETAS AVGGG, &C., the three g'S
indicating the tliree emperors, l^ut the most curious of all the
coins of Carausius yet discovered, is one which was formerly
in the possession of my friend, Mr E-oach Smith, and which,
contrary to the universal practice of the earlier Roman coiuage,
gives the emperor's head with a f'rout face, instead of a profile.
From this circumstance, and from its superior execution, Mr
Smith is inclined to believe that it was struck expressly as a
V
correct portrait of this remarkable man, and as thus it forms
one of the most interesting records of our history, it is here
given from his ' Collectanea Antiqua,' where it was first pub-
lished. This unique coin is in small brass, in an excellent state
of preservation, and was found at Wroxeter, in Sliropshire, the
site of the Homan town of Uriconium.*
We have said that Carausius held the supreme power in
Britain during nearly seven years (from 287 to 293). In 292, ^
the two emperors, Maximian and Dioclesian, strengthened their
government by the appointment of two Csesars, Constantius and
* This coin is now, with Mr Roach Smith's collection of antiquities
from Roman London, in the British Museum.
142 THE ROMANS. [chap. it.
Galerius ; and Constantiiis, to whose lot the provinces of tlie
west fell, prepared immediately to reduce the island chieftain.
We have the account of the events that followed chiefly from
imperial panegyrists, who conceal all the circumstances advan-
tageous to the usurper, but their outline is no doubt correct.
Constantius having collected a very powerful army, made a rapid
march to Gessoriacum, and laid siege unexpectedly to the grand
naval station of Carausius. Then, as now, this port could only
be entered at full tide, and Constantius took advantage of the
ebb to block it up entirely with an embankment of piles and
stones. Before this, however, had been effected, Carausius,
Avho Avas in Gessoriacum at the time of the arrival of Constan-
tius, took to his ships and sailed away to Britain.
Gessoriacum soon surrendered to the imperial arms, but
Constantius found a greater obstacle to his immediate success
iu the want of ships. Four years passed away in the construc-
tion of a fleet, in the course of which Carausius himself had
ceased to live. The empty bauble of empire had excited the
ambition of Allectus, an officer whom Carausius had placed at
the head of his fleet, and who basely and treacherously mur-
dered his master. Allectus immediately seized the imperial
authority, and, without the abilities of Carausius, attempted to
follow in his course. During three years, while Constantius re-
mained inactive, or only occupied in reducing to obedience the
Franks and other allies of the usurper, Allectus was allowed to
remain undisturbed. His coins include some which are different
from those of his predecessor, and, considering the duration of
his reign, they are almost as numerous. At length, in the year
296, Constantius had completed his vast preparations for inva-
sion, and he is said to have been the first to set sail. His
])rincipal force, under the command of the praefect Asclepiodotus,
Avhich had assembled in the mouth of the Seine, immediately
followed, and directing their course towards the western coast of
Britain, were enabled by a thick fog to elude the fleet of Allec-
tus, which was stationed off the Isle of Wight. It was after-
wards said in praise of Asclepiodotus, that he ventui-ed out to sea
on a stormy day, with a side wind (which was then considered
bold seamanship), and that when he landed on the British
coast, he burnt his galleys, that his troops might find their only
safety in victory.
Meanwhile Allectus, Avho expected that the imperial forces
would cross over directly into Kent, had taken up a position in
the neighbourhood of London. He no sooner received intelli-
CAW. IV.] CONSTANTIUS. 143
<>'ence of tlie landing of Asolepiodotiis, than lie Imrried hastily
to meet hiin, carrving- with him only a part of his troops, and
those chiefly his Frankish anxiliaries. The consequence was
that he was defeated in his first engagement with his enemies,
and he was himself slain in the battle. As much of his army P ^
as escaped fled to London, plundered that rich city, and pre- -^r
pared to sail with the spoils to the continent. But they were
so closely pursued hy the imperial army, that the greater part
of them are said to have been slain in the streets of the capital.
According to the panegyrists, the population of Britain hailed
the day of the arrival of Constantius as that of their redemption
from an oppressive and ci'uel tyranny. The imperial com-
mander took up his residence in York, from which we may
perhaps assume that he had been called to the north to repress
the turbulence of the Picts and Scots. But all we know of his
proceedings is tiie simple fact, that he had been in Britain
nine years when, in the year 305, the resignation of Dioclesian and
Maximian left the lloman empire to Galerius and Constantius.
Constantius, who is usually known by the name of Constan-
tius Chlorus, was the father of C'onstantine the Great ; but the
story that his wife Helena was of British origin appears to be a
mere fable. At the time of his father's accession to the empire
of the West, Constantine was serving in the army under Gale-
rius, in Nicomedia, aiul it is supposed that Galerius, who would
willingly have been without a partner in the empire, intended
to keep him as a hostage for his father. But Constantine
made his escape, and travelling with extreme rapidity, reaclK^d
Gessoriacura in safety, and finding his father there, passed with
him into Britain, Avhere he assisted in the government, and soon
ingratiated himself with the troops and with the people. They
proceeded immediately to the north, to direct an expedition
against the barbarians, but Constantius was already struck with
disease, and, after this expedition, on the 25th of July, 306, he
died at York. The soldiers immediately saluted his son Con-
stantine as their emperor, and Galerius was induced to yield to
their wishes. Constantine remained resident in our island,
though his acts are not recorded, until, six years afterwards, he
was called away to enter upon the contest which ended in mak-
ing him sole ruler of the Ronuui world.
Britain now enjoyed a continued calm of more than thirty
years. Tiie emperor Constans paid a visit to Britain in 347, but
we know not for Avhat purpose ; though it is probable that the
British legions had begun again to show an inclination to throw
lU THE ROMANS. t^HAP. iv.
off tlieir dependence on Eonie. Tliree years after his retiini
tVom l^ritain, Constans i'ell a sacrifice to tlie ambition and trea-
son of Magnentins, one of his officers, a Triton by birth. The
troops in Britain probably snpported the canse of Magnentins,
and, after that usurper's defeat and deatli, in 853, the province
snifered severely from the anger of the conqueror. The historian
Aminianus MarceUinus tells us that a Spanish notary, named
Paulas, who had gained by his cunning and astuteness the sur-
name of Catena (the chain), was sent to Britain to institute
proceedings against those who had espoused tlie cause of Mag-
nentins. Baukis made use of the powers which had been given
him by the emperor in so cruel and oppressive a manner, that he
became an object of general detestation ; and when the civil
ruler of the island, whose name was Martin, interfered in favour
of his victims, he attempted to involve him, and many of his
officers, under the same accusations. Ammianus tells us how
Martin tried to save himself and his friends Ijy slaying the im-
perial accuser, but failing in the attempt, he immediately killed
himself with his own sword. ' Paulus returned to court steeped
in British blood, and dragging Avith him a multitude of wretched
victims loaded with chains, whose looks depicted the hopeless-
ness of their destiny. Some of these suffered horrible toi'tiu-es
at the hands of the executioners ; while others were proscribed
and exiled, and others had their heads struck from theii' bodies
on the scaffold.'
The visitation of Paulus Catena was followed by one of a
diffei'eut kind, but no less disastrous to the inhabitants of the
province. The Picts and Scots joined together, and began to
carry their ravages far into the south. Britain had, no doid)t,
been robbed of much of its military force in the recent struggles
for empire, and it had been further weakened by the severities
of Paulus ; its troops, therefore, Avere insufficient for its defence,
and they were obliged to send over into Gaul to ask assistance
of Julian, to whom Constantius had entrusted the defence of
that province against the incursions of the Germans. Julian
sent to Britain his vtagister armornni, or camp marshal, Lupi-
cinus, a brave and experienced officer, who took with him some
light auxiliary troops, with a few companies of the Heruli,
MiBsians, and Batavians, and hastened over from Gessoriacum
to Rutupise, and thence to London. We have no further account
of his expedition, but he probably retabated severely on the
northern invaders, for the island seems to have had again along-
period of undisturbed tranquillity.
CHAP, v.l THE ITIXEKARIES OF BRITAIN. U5
CHAPTEE V.
A Journey throufjli Roman Britain— Londinium — Great Road from Lon-
diniuin to Seg'ontium — Verulamiuin ; Uriconiuiii, &c. — Direct North-
ern Road from Londinium ; Durobrivae, Lindum, Danum, Ebura-
cum, Isurium — Passa<;-e of the two Walls — Stations on the Wall —
Branch to Ltig-uballium and Blatuiu Buliiium — Eastern Road ; Camu-
lodunum, Camboricum — From Londinium to Calleva — Branch to
Corinium and Glevum ; Isca, and Maridunum — From Glevum by
Mag-na to Deva, and thence throug'h Coccium to the North — Cross
Roads — Salinas and other towns — The Western Road, from Calleva to
Sorbiodunum, Durnovaria, and Isca Dumnoniorum — Aqute Solis —
The trnjeetus to Wales, and the Sarn Helen — The Road on the
Southern Coast ; Venta Belgarum, Clauscntum, Fortus Magnus.
Regnum, Anderida, Fortus Lemanis.
At the period we have now reached, the face of the island was
strang-ely altered from that which it ])reseuted when visited by
Caesar. Well inhabited and well cultivated, it "was divided like
a network by innumerable roads, many of tliem wide and all of
excellent construction, wliich formed a communication between
a multitude of nourishing cities and towns. Several principal
lines of roads carried the traveller into and across the island in
different directions.*
* Two impei'fect itineraries, giving us the names and distances from each
other of the towns and stations on the principal military roads, have been
preserved. The first is contained in the great Itinerarium of the Roman
empire, which goes under the name of Antoninus, and is believed to have
been compiled about a.d. 320. The other is contained in the work of
Richard of Cirencester, and is supposed to have been copied by a monk of
the fourteenth century, from an older itinerary or map. They ditt'er a
little from each other, and, though our faith in Richard's Itinerary is not
strong, it is certain nearly all the roads he gives which are not in Antoni-
nus have been ascertained to exist. Traces of many Roman roads are
found all over the country, not mentioned in these itineraries, and names
of a areat number of towns found neither in Antoninus nor in Richard, v
are given by an anonymous geographe)* of Ra\ennu, who wrote about the
middle of the seventh century ; but as he has placed them in no regulai-
Older, it is very difficult uow to identify their sites.
146 THE ROMANS. [chap. v.
Tlie stranger wlio embarked at Gessoriaciun, on the eoast of
Gaul, was carried, <>-uided at night by the light from the lofty
pharos of Dubrae (Dover), into the port of Rutupiie, celebrated
for its oysters, Avliich was the usual place of landing from the
Continent. The citadel of Rutupiae stood on an elevation com-
manding the beach, and its massive walls still remain at Kich-
borougli, about three-quarters of a mile to the north-east of the
modern town of Sandwich. From the masses of white marble
that have been scattered about, it is evident that this citadel was
adorned with handsome buildings. The town lay behind the
citadel, spread over a gentle declivity, while at the top of the
hill to the north are still seen the remains of its amphitheatre,
llutupiae stood on the edge of the isle of Thanet, separated from
the rest of Cantium by a creek which ran through to the mouth
of the Thames, where its entrance was defended by another
town and citadel, named Eegulbium, now Keculver, of which a
portion of the walls still remains. Another Roman port s.-ems
to have occupied the site of the modern harbour of Ramsgate.*
From Rutnpisethe traveller crossed over the water — the place
whence the Rutupine oysters were taken, and where, in digging,
the remains of the oyster-beds are still found — to the site of
tlie present town of Sandwich, and. here he entered the high
road, which led directly over the downs, by the present village
of Ash, to a hu'ge town called Durovernum, which occupied
probably the whole site of the modern city of Canterbury. Part
of the Roman walls were standing a century ago, and tesselated
pavements and other antiquities discovered tliere at different
times, show its importance. It was the point from which sever-
al roads branched, communicating with the towns on the coast,
Regnlbium, Rutupise, Dubrse, and the Portus Lemanis. The
road leading to the interior of the island left Durovernum on the
north-east, and proceeded over the high grounds of tiie forest of
Blee, by a town named Durolewan, ilie probable site of which
seems to be Davington, but which was apparently one of those
imimportant stations that have left scarcely a trace behind, to a
more important town named Durobrivae, on the site of the pre-
sent city of Rochester, situated on a river then called the Madus.
now the Medway. The road then proceeded across towards the
* On the antiquities )i Rutupiae and Reg:ulbiuin, the reader should con-
sult the excellent work by Mr Roach Smith, ' The Antiquities of Rich-
boroiigh, Reculver, and Lyinne,' in which tliey have been inve-;tigated
with remarkable skill and care. It is itself almost a manual of Roman
antiquities.
CHAP, v.] ROMAX LONDON. 147
banks of tlie Thames, where the traveller arrived at a town named
Vag-niacae, the situation of which is also somewliat douljtfid,
thoug-h it is g-enerally believed to have stood in the neighbour-
hood of Southfleet. Traces of Roman settlements are found
tliicklv scattered along the line of this road, and betw-si^'n it and
the Thames. Prom Vagniacse the road proceeded by Dartford,
over Shooter's Hill, across Blackheath, and to a town in the
territory of the ancient tribe of the Regni, called Noviomagus,
which is supposed to have stood on the side of Holwood II ill,
in tlie parish of Bromley. Fifteen Roman miles to the north
brought the traveller again to the banks of the Thames, at the
foot of the bridge by which he entered the great commercial
town of Londinium.
Roman London was built on the elevated ground on both
sides of a stream, known in after time by the name of Wall-
brook, which ran into the Thames not far from Southwark
Bridge, and extending Avestward to the edge of a hill overlook-
ing another stream, called in later times Holbourne, and on the
east almost to the Tower. Its walls were identical with those
which enclosed the mediaeval city of London. At this time it
seems to have had two principal lines of streets, one running
from the bridge northward in the line of Bishopsgate-street,
the other branching from it, and running along or near tiie line
of the modern Watling-sti-eet, till it left the city by Ludgate.
At the western end of this street the principal temples and
public buildings seem to have stood, crowning the hill, and
occupying the side Avhich sloped down to the river. The
northern and north-eastern parts of the town were occupied
with extensive and — to judge by the remains which have been
brought to light— magniftcent mansions. Londinium had in-
creased much in extent since it had been founded by the
Romans. It has been supposed by a recent writer that the
iirst town was confined to the hdl on the east of Wallbrook.*
Mr Roach Smith discovered, in excavations on the site of the
Royal Exchange, pits which had been receptacles of the rubbish
from the shops and houses of Roman London at an earlier
period of its existence, and which had been afterwards filled up
and built over. At the period to which our last chapter has
brought us, the city had extended to the other side of the
* This notion on the earliest form of Londinium was published in an
essay on the original site of Roman London, by Mr Arthur Taylor, in the
thirty-third volume of the ' Archaeolojiia. '
MS THE ROMANS. [chap. v.
Tliames, and tlie boroiig'li of Soutluvark stands upon o-roimd
M'hicli covers tlie floors of Roman liouses and the paving-s of
Eoman streets.*
Two principal roads led out of Londinium on the nortli side
of the Thames ; one apparently in the direction of Bishopsg-ate,
tlie other westward, through Ludgate, across Holbonrne, and in
the direction of Fleet-street and the Strand. Without New-
gate, on each side of this road, the principal sepulchral monu-
ments of the citizens of Londinium appear to have stood. It was
the grand route to the west of Britain ; hut somewhere near
the present site of Knightsbridgc another large road branched
off northward, and proceeded in a direct line along the modern
Kilbnrn road, until the traveller arrived at a town named
SulloniacPB, the traces of which are now found on an elevation
called Brockley Hill, a little south of Elstree, on the borders
of Hertfordshire. Hence the road continued its direct course,
through a rich and varied country, to the grand municipal city
of Verulamium, the extensive walls of which are still traced in
the neiglibourhood of St Albans. A'^erulamium was the fashion-
able town of the south-east, and possessed, wliat probably few
towns in Britain did, a theatre.
From Verulamium the road proceeded through the same rich
country, nearly straight, to a town named Durocobrivse, which
must have stood at or in the immediate vicinity of the modern
town of Dunstable, which is marked as an ancient station by
the number of tumuli and intrenchments in the neighbourhood.
It was apparently the great market of tliese agricidtural dis-
tricts, over which the goddess Diana presided, as it was known
also by the name of Forum Dianse. On leaving this place the
traveller continued his route across the beautiful country to the
south of Woburn till he entered a more open valley, where he
reached the town of Magiovintum, supposed to have stood at
the place where the road crossed the river Ousel, in the im-
mediate vicinity of Fenny Stratford. The road then again
* Numerous particulars relating; to Roman London will be found in
papers by Mr Roach Smith, scattered throug-h the volumes of the ' Arclne-
olofj:ia,' of the Society of Antiquaries, and other archfeological works. See
'also a paper on this subject in my ' Aichseological Album.' Whenever
excavations are made witliin the limits of the city of London, the workmen
come to the Roman floors at a depth of from twelve to eighteen or twenty
feet under the present level. Since the first edition of this volume was
published, Mr Roach Smith has given to the public his valuable work on
tiie early antiquities of the capital of Britain, entited ' Antiquities of
Roman London.'
CHAP, v.] THE XORTH-WESTERX ROAD. 140
mounted higher gTOimd, passing over the site of Stoney Strat-
ford, and so on to Lactodorum, a town occupyino; the site of
the modern Towcester. The road then turned slightly north
to Weedon, at which point a cross road turned off leading to
what some have considered two towns, Isannavaria and Benna-
venta, wliich have been placed at Burnt Walls and Burrow Hill,
;:ncient sites near Daventry, though others have imagined this to
be one town under two different names. The main road con-
tinued its course from Weedon in a straight line across an open
country to the neighbourhood of the modern town of Lilburne,
where it crossed the river Avon at Dove Bridge. Here stood a
town called Triponthnn, which must have possessed something
remarkable in its bridge or bridges across the river. Tumuli
and earthworks, scattei'ed over the country around, again mark
it as a place of some importance. The country now became
more uneven, and the road proceeded till it reached the top of a
liill witliin tlie borders of Leicestershire, where stood the town
of Benonae, the site of which is now occupied by High Cross.
The next town at which the traveller arrived was Mandues-
sednm, occupving the slope of a hill over the river Anker, and
surrounded by high grounds. The site of this town is now
called Manceter (in the county of Warwick), and the square
intrenchments of the ancient station are still seen, while the
hills to the south are covered with tumuli. After leaving
Mandiiessedum, the traveller passed through a continuation of
rich agricultural district, open to tlie north, but rising into a
fine hilly country to the south, the road generally taking the
higher grounds, until it readied the town of Eteocetum. The
last traces of its buildings have long disappeared, but the tra-
dition of them appears to be preserved* in the modern name of
the site. Wall, in Staffordshire. The road turned hence west-
ward, proceeding direct through Stretton, till it crossed the
little river Penk, where stood the town of Pennocrucium. The
road now went through a more wooded and hilly country, until
the traveller arrived at Uxaconium, a])parently but a small un-
important town, which has been placed by some at Bed Hill, a
little to the north-east of Shiflnall, in Shropshire, and by others
at Oaken -gates, near Wembridge. It proceeded thence, turn-
ing slightly south, to the important town of Yiroconium or
Uriconium, the remains of which are found at the modern
village of Wroxeter. Important excavations have been, during
the last few years, made on this site, which have thrown con-
siderable light on the earlv history of our island. Uriconium
<
150 THE ROMANS. [chap. v.
was one of tlie Inr^-est Roman cities in Britain. It was snr-
rounded by a wall and toss, the remains of which maybe traced
all round, and are npwards of three miles in extent; and inclose
a space of about double that of Roman London. The town
occupied a pictnresque and strono^ position, at the foot of the
celebrated Shropshire hill of the Wrekin, which, pei'haps, o"ave
its name to the place, and on the bank of the river Severn, just
where it is joined by the Tamar. It was evidently of con-
siderable importance, and well inhabited ; it had a forum of
great extent, and it possessed a theatre of considerable size
in the heart of the town, as well as an amphitheatre outside.*
Here one branch of the g'reat road crossed the Severn, and
])roceeded in a north-westwardly direction to Rutunium, a
Roman town, the site of Avhicli is generally placed at Rowton,
in Shropshire, after which it entered Wales, passing under the
north end of the Breidden mountain, to a town called
Mediolanum, situated where the road crossed the river Tanad.
The traveller then pursued his way among the wild mountains
of North Wales, till he approached the majestic heights oi
Ivlons Heriri {S note don) , and halted at a station of that name,
the intrenchments of which are still observed at a place named
from them. Tomen-y-mur, in the valley of Maentwrog. Thence
the road led down to the coast, where the traveller entered
Segontium, one of the most important Roman towns in Wales,
the walls of which are still visible at Caer Seiont, near Caer-
narvon, on the coast of the Irish Sea.
If the stranger were not bound for the midland districts, he
might leave Londiuium by the gate known in later times by the
name of Bishopsgate, and pursue the great road to the noith..
His way at first ran through woods and corn districts, and the
traveller passed over considerable distances without meeling
with towns or stations. His Hrst halting- place was a small
station named — we are not certain Avhy — Ad Fines, the site of
which is supposed to have been at Broughing, in Hertfordshire,
at the confluence of two streams, the Rib and the Quin.
Thence the road proceeded in a direct line to Durolipons, the
site of which is fixed without doubt at Godmanchester, on the
river Ouse. The traveller had noAv entered upon the low, flat
* I have published an account of these excavations, and of the discoverit s
made in the course of them, in a rather large volume entitled ' Uiiconiuiii ;
a Hist(«rical Account of the Ancient Roman City, and of the Excavations
made upon its site at Wroxeter, in Shropshire, forming- a sketch of the
Condition and History of the Welsh Border during the Roman Period.
By Thomas Wright, M.A., F.S.A. 8vo. London, 1872.'
cn.vp. v.] TOWNS IX THE NORTH ROAD. lol
oountrv on the borders of tlie fens, to avoid which the road
turned a little west, and then continuinii; its dreary course to
the north reached a district covered with potteries, in the midst
of which he entered a rich and ele^-ant town named Durobrivpe,
situated on one of the sluo'g'ish rivers of this district, which in
modern times is called the Nen, and the site of the Eoman
town is now occupied by an obscure villao'e called Castor.*
Hence the road contiiuied nearly north, with a slig'ht cnrve, to
another town of some importance, named Causennse, or, accord-
in^- to other authorities, Isir.Ee, situated on slig-htly elevated gTOund.
There can be no doubt th:it this town occupied the site of the
modern Ancaster, Avhich has been celebrated for its Roman
antiquities since the time of Leland.f Another stag-e brouii'ht
the traveller to Lindum, a noble city, both for the elegance of
its buildings, and its position on a lofty isolated hill, command-
ing extensive views on every side over the flat country around.
Its modern representative is easily recognized in the city of
Lincoln.
The traveller Avho is not willing to follow the dreury road
we have been describing, might take another route, which,
though less direct, lay through a more beautiful country, in
Avhich the towns wei-e more numerous and interesting. He left
Londinium by its western gate, and, proceeding along the road
already described, he passed through Sulloniacse, Verulamiuni,
Hurocobrivae, Magiovintum, Lactodorum, and Tripontium, to
Venonre. There, instead of continuing his route to Manduesse-
dum, he took another gi-eat road which turned off to the north-
east, and proceeded direct to llita?, one of the largest and most
important of the midland cities, adorned with rich mansions
* The very inferestinj? antiquities of this Roman town were explored by
the late Mr E. Tyrrell Artis, of Castor, who published them in a series of
expensive plates, but which were not accompanied with a text.
t Leland, in his Itinerary, vol. i. pp. 28, 29, has left us the following-
note on the antiquities discovered at Ancaster in his time : — ' In tymes
past it hath bene a celebrate toune, but not waullid, as far as I could' per-
ceive. Tlie buildini>- of it lay in leu,2:hth by south and north. In the
s(mth ende of it be often tymes founde in ploughing- great square stones of
old buildinges and lloniayne Coynes of brasse and sylver. In the west
ende of it, where now meadowes be, ar founde yn dichiug; grreat vaultes.
... An old man of Ancaster told me that by Ureby, or Roseby, a ploug-h-
man toke up a stone, and found iinother stone under it, wherein was a
square hole having Romaine quoin in it. He told me also that a plough-
man toko up in the felde- of llarleshm a 2 miles from Granteham a stone,
under the which was a potte of brasse, and an helmet of gold, sette with
stones in it, the which was presentid to Catarine princes dowajjer. There
were bedes of silver in the potte, and writings corruptid.'
152 TllK ROMAXS. [chai>. v.
and temples, and other public buiklino-s.* Its site is now
occupied by the town of Leicester. Thence, keeping' to tlu^
eastward of tlie gTeat forest of Charnwood, the road proceeded
over a rich country to Yerometuin — a town supposed to have
stood in the immediate neifrhl)ourhood of Willoughby, on tlie
borders of Nottinghamshire. A few miles more brou<i-ht the
traveller to a town on the river Trent, named Margidunum,
supposed to have stood at or near Bri(Ii>vford, and next he
reached a station on the same river, called, no doubt from its
bridge over tlie river, Ad Pontem, believed to have stood near
the modern village of Earndon. The next halting-place was
Crococolana, a town supposed to have stood at Brough, in
Lincolnshire, from \\hich another stage took him to Lindum.f
Here he again took the north road from Londinium, and
soon after leaving Lindum he turned off westwardly, and, aftei*
a short stage, repassing the river Trent, halted at the town of
Segelocum, or Agelocum, on the site of the modern town of
Littlcborough. Thence, still keeping a little westward, the road
brought him, after a somewhat longer stage, to the more im-
jDortant station of Danum, a site now known by the somewhat
celebrated name of Doncaster. From Danum the road turned
north, and after a shorter stage, reached Legiolium, supposed to
have occupied the site of the modern village of Castleford, at
the continence of the Ayr and the Calder, and proceeded thence
to the town of Calcaria, which probably received its name from
its lime-works, and is now represented by Tadcaster, the last
station before reaching Eburacum, the second, if not the first,
city in Britain,
There was another road from Lindum to Eburacum. It pro-
ceeded in a direct line from the former place to a town or station
on the Humber {Abus), called — no doubt from the great river
near which it stood — Ad Abum, supposed to have been at Win-
terton. The traveller arrived here in two stages, stopping only
at a half-way station, the only name of which that has come
* The importance and beauty of Ratai are evinced by the numerous fine
tesselated pavements that have been found tliere. Some of its public
buildings appear to have been standing in the time of Geuflrey of Mon-
mouth, who speaks of a subterranean temple of Janus : ' In quodam sub-
terraneo quod sub Sora tluvio intra Legecestriam fieri prajceperat. Erat
autem subterraneum illud c(mditum in honorem bifrontis Jani.' — Galf.
Hon. Hist. Brit., lib. ii. c. 14.
t The Roman towns between Rata3 and Lindum have been less a]mo.*t
than any others examined by modern antiquaries, and their sites are only
iixed by conjecture.
c^\r. v.] EBUEACUM. 1.33
down to us is one taken from its position, In Medio. From
Ad Abum the traveller crossed the Hnmber in a boat, and
landed at another town, called, from the river on which it stood,
Ad Petuariam, supposed to have occupied the site of Broug-li,
on the Hnmber, where interesting- Eoman antiquities have been
found. From Brough the road seems to have proceeded to
Eburacum without any intermediate station, a distance esti-
mated in the ancient Itinerary at forty-six Roman miles, so that
it perhaps went by a circuitous route, joining some one of the
roads from Eburacum to the coast.
Ebnracnm, or Eboracum* (as its name was difl'erently spelt),
occupietl the i)anks of a navigable river called the Urus (now
the Ouse). AVithin its walls, which were of considerable extent,
stood the imperial palace, and no doubt other magnificent edi-
fices, and both within and without were temples to most of the
Roman gods, as well as to the eastern deities, Serapis and
Mithras. Ontside the Avails, the city was surrounded with ex-
tensive and well-built suburbs. f
Many roads branched off from Ebnracnm in different direc-
tions. Several of these ran towards the coast, and communicat-
ed no donbt with trading ports. Of these the principal was a
military road, leading by two towns, named Derventio and
Delgovitia, to an apparently important town on the coast called
Praetonmn. Various positions have been fixed for these towns,
chieHy on the assumption that Praetorium stood at Flamborough
Head. There are extensive remains of an important Roman
station at Old Malton, on the river Derwent, and as we know
that there was a Derventio in the interior of the island on a
river called the Derwent, it is not improbable that the station
at Old Malton may have been Derventio. But the Roman an-
tiquities of East Yorkshire have as yet been very imperfectly
explored.
The great north road which we have been pursuing, after
leaving* Ebnracnm, tnrned westAvard, in the direction of the
Ouse, until at the end of a comparatively short stage, the tra-
* Eburacum is the spelling- g-iven in the Itinerary of Antoninus, in
Ptolemy, and in the geo(^rapher of Ravenna, while an inscription fonnerly
found at York, but not preserved, as well as the llonian histoi'ians who
mention this place, call it Eboracum. The weight of authority, however,
.^eeins to be turned in favour of the former, by an inscription more recently
discovered, and certainly reading ehvk.
t An excellent volume on the Roman antiqiiities of York was pub-
lished by the Rev. C. Wellbeloved, of that city, under the title of ' Ebura-
cum, or York under the Romans,' which is reconuucnded earnestly to the
student of the history and antiquities of the Romans iu Britain.
]'54 THE ROMANS. [chap. v.
veller arrived at another larg-e and well-built town, Isiiriiun,
the walls of which are still traced at Aldboroiigh, and within
them the excavator meets continually with the tesselated floors
of the Roman houses.* A long'cr sta<^-e carried the traveller to
Cataracto, or Cataractoniuni, the ancient name of which has
been preserved by the villag-e of Catteric, on the river Swale,
and a few miles further the road crossed the river Tisa [the Tees),
it is supposed at Piercebridge, near Darlington, where there
was also a station. The traveller had now entered the modern
countv of Durham, and the road pursued its course nearly north,
through a rich and interesting country, to Viiiovium, a town of
some extent, of which there are considerable remains in the
modern hamlet of Binchester, near Bishop Auckland. The
next town on this road was Epiacum, which occupied a lofty
brow on a tongue of land formed by the junction of two small
streams on the west side of the modern village of Laiichester,
where abundant remains of the Roman town have been found.
It appears by inscriptions fouml on this site, that this town
had its basilica or court-house, and its public baths and arsenal,
and other important buildings. The road now turned west-
wardly again till it reached Vindomora, which is supposed to
be the station traceable at Ebchester, on the borders of North-
umberland, f A few miles further he came to the town of Cor-
stopitum, the modern site of which is called Corchester, near Cor-
bi'idge on the Tyne, and before he reached it, a bridge, of which
the remains are still to be traced, carried the traveller over the
river Tina. He was now only about two miles from the great
wall erected by the emperor Hadrian, which the road passed at
an opening a little to the west of the station of Hunnum. On the
other side of the wall the road separated into two branches, one
of which turned oil" towards the coast, while the other proceeded
to the town of Habitancum (now Risingham), situated on a
pleasant stream, in a small valley, sheltered by surrounding
hills. An inscription found in this place commemorates the
rebuilding, in the reign of Caracalla, of the gate and of the
* A series of very carefully executed plates of the tesselated paveruents
of Isurium were published by Mr H. Ecroyd Smith, who has since pub-
lished a quarto volume, illustrated with numerous engravings, on the An-
tiquities of Aldborough.
t Some doubt has been thrown on the appropriation of these two last
sites, though it does not appear to be well founded. No other sites answer
so well to Epiacum and Vindomoi-a, and we can tind no other names for
what, by the reuiains still visible, were evidently towns of considerable
importance.
CKAP. v.] THE TOWN OF LUGUBALLIUM. loo
walls, which liad become ruinous by age : tlie remains, which
al'ter so many centuries still present themselves, show that they
were rebuilt well. A very little further stood the town of Ere-
menium, which an inscription identities wdth the modern villao-e
of Hig'h Rochester. Here also a bridge passed over tlie river.
The traveller then pursued his way by longer stages by Trimon-
tium, which has been fixed at Eildon, and Curia, placed by
some at Currie, and by others at Borthwick Castle, to the east-
ern end of the vallum of Antoninus, and passing it, if he were
bound to the far north, he proceeded to the towns of Alauna,
Lindum, Victoria, and Orrea.
In the course of the great road from Eburacum to the north,
it had several smaller offsets or branches. One of these led
apparently from Vinovium to the important town of Pons ^^lii,
or Newcastle, and another to the stations which commanded the
mouth of the Tyne, at Jarrow and South Shields. A larger
branch turned oft" a little beyond Cataracto, and carried the
ti'aveller westward to the town of Lavatrae, which, there seems
little reason for doubt, occupied the site of the present town of
Bowes. A few miles further he reached Verterae, which is sup-
posed to liave stood on the site of the town of Broiigh in
Westmoreland, where many lloman antiquities have been found
at different times.* He was now on the confines of the mount-
ainous district which had formed the stronghold of the
Brigantes ; to the south rose the heights of Stanemoor, while to
the west were seen the stdl nobler mountains of the lake dis-
trict, Avhich he approached nearer as he reached the neit town
of BrovonacfB, supposed to have stood at the modern villao-e of
Kirby-Thore, where Roman antiquities are found, and Bro-
cavium, which its position and the niunerous antiquities found
tliere seem to identify with Brougham. f Another stage and
the traveller arrived at the important city of Luguballium, or
Luguvalliuin, with its temples and palaces, and other public
* In the time of Leland, Brough seems to have been proverbial for
the antiquities continually found there. He says; — ' Borow, now a
vyllage, set in Lunesdale a vi. myles beneth the foote of Dentdale, hath
heene by likelyhod sum notable town. The ploughnienne find there
yn ering lapides qnadratos, and many other straung thinges ] and
this place is much spoken of the inhabitants there' —Itinerary , vol. vii.
p. 48.
t ' At Burgham is an old castel that the commune people ther sayeth
dith synke. Abovvt this Burgham plowghmen fynd in the feldes niany
.-({uare stones, tokens of old buildinges. Tlie castefis set in a stronge place
by reasons of ry vers enclosing the cuntery ihanihowt.'' —Leland' is Itinerani.
vul. vii. p. 49. '^'
\r,r, THE IIOM.ANS. [cHAr. v.
edifices. Tlicre can be no (loiil)t tliat the modern eity of Car-
lisle starids upon its ruins.* From Liig-uballiuui the road a^i'ain
passed the Avail of Hadrian, proceed ini;' by the Castra Explora-
torvim, Avliich is identified with the nodern Ketherby, where
numerous antiquities have been found, T51atuni Bulg'ium, which
is placed at Middleby, and Uxelum, which is supposed to have
stood at Castlcover, and so on to Colania, the modern Lanark,
and Yanduaria, or Paisley, where it passed the western extremity
of the o-reat barrier of Antoninus, and ended at the remote
town of Theodosia, or Pumbarton.f
The traveller in Britain has thus, l)y two different roads,
passed the Avail of Hadrian, and the more northern earthen
vallum of Antoninus. The first of these monuments must
have attracted his attention by its extraordinary chai"acter, and
he Avould be tempted to cross the island by the great road which
accompanied its course. As he approached it from Eburacum
he entered a populous region, which marked the great com-
mercial importance of the stations on the Tyne. Strong posts
commanded the entrance to the river both on the south and on
the north. One of these stood at Tynemouth, where, as we
learn from a mutilated inscription still preserved, the usurper
Maximinus, then an officer in the sixth legion, erected some
public buildings, Avhich included a basilica, as Avell as a temple.
Avhich seem to have occupied the site of the famous abbey of
after ages. A few miles up the bank of the river brought the
* There is a curious passage in Bede's Life of St Cuthbert (oliap. 27).
where the saint is described as visiting the city of Lugubalia. and as being
taken by the citizens to see the Roman walls, and the wonderful fountain
which had been built there by the Romans. ' Venit ad Lugubaliaiu
civitatem (qua3 a populis Anglorum corrupte Luel vocatur).
Postera autem die deducentibus eum civibus ut videret moenia civitatis,
fontemque in ea miro quondam Romanorum opereexstructum.' This was
in the seventh century. Leland, at the beginning of the sixteenth century,
speaks of the numerous antiquities found at Carlisle in his time (Itt>i.,
vol. vii. p. 54). 'In diggying to make new building yn the towne often
tymes hath bene, and now a late, fownd diverse fundations of the old cite,
as pavimentes of streates, old arches of dores, coyne, stones squared,
paynted pottes, mony hid yn pottes so hold and muldid that when it was
stronly towchid yt went almost to mowlder ; as yn M . . . glalbyls howse
yn digging for the squaryng .... his gardin and orchard, the
M'hich ston . . . eth much sowth. The hole site of the towne is sore
chaungid. For wher as the stretes where and great edifices now be vacant
and garden plottes. In the feldes abowt Cairluel yn plowghing hath be
found diverse cornelines and other stony s well entayled for seales, and in
other places of Cumbarland in plowinge hath be fownd brickes conteyn-
inge the prints of antique workes.' — Page 54.
f The Roman antiquities of Scotland have been collected in a volume,
entitled ' Caledonia Romana,' by Robert Stuart. Edinburgh, 1845.
cUAi'. v.] THE WALL OF IIADrjAX. lo7
traveller to the town or station of Seo-edniuim. Here tlie wall
of Hadrian beg-an, and from this cireunistance the spot has
received in modern times the name, now so widely celebrated,
of AVallsend. The wall was a massive work of masonry, vary- ,
iiig- from six to nearly ten feet in thickness, and from eighteen ]
to nineteen feet high. On the north it was accompanied by a i
foss thirty-six feet wide, and fifteen feet deep. To the sonth
was another lesser foss, Avith a triple entrenchment of earth and
stones. At no great distance apart, along the line of the wall,
were stations or towns, erich consisting of a citadel, strongly
walled, with streets and habitations within, and often extensive
subni'bs without. Between these towns stood smaller fortresses,
which, from the circumstance of their occurring at the distance
of one Eoman mile irom each other, have been termed mile-
casth's ; and between each of these again were ibur small sub- ^
sidiary buildings, which for distinction have been termed watch- A
towers.
The wall, as we have just stated, began on the east at Seg-e-
dununi. It there advanced to the south into the river Tyne, as
far as the low-water mark, while it pursued its course westwardly
to a town of great extent and commercial importance, named,
from its bridge across the river Tyne built by Hadrian, Pons
JElu, which occupied the site of the present town of Newcastle.
Little more than two miles from this place brought the traveller
to Condercum, a town beautifully situated on an elevated knoll,
which commaiuls views of the valley of the Tyne to the south-
west, and northwardly of the distant and lofty Cheviots. The
houses and walls of the ancient town may still be traced in the
unevenness of the sod Avhicli covers them, at a spot which is now
called Benwell. Thence the wall proceeded over hill and vale,
for the country was here much varied, to the next town, which
appears to have been of less importance, and Avas called Vindo-
bala ; its site is now called Rutchester. The next town which
presented itself to the traveller was named Hunnnm, apparently
a handsome a)id Avell-inhabited place, the deserted site of which
may now be distinctly traced at Halton-Chesters. He now cross-
ed the great road which passed the wall in its way from York,
and, pursuing the course of the wall, crossed the northern Tyne
by a bridge, of which the piers still remain, and entered the large
town of Cilurnmu, the extensive ruins of which, Avell described
as a British Pompeii, are visible near the modern hamlets of
Chesters. This station also had its temples and public build-
ings, which, to jutlge from the broken statues and fragments of
158 THE ROMANS. [chap. v.
jircliitectural decoration wliicli are found there, must have been
distiu<>-uished by tlieir beauty. The next town, Procolitia, dis-
tant only a sliort stag'e, is traced at the spot now called Carraw-
burgli. Another stage, al)out the same lengtli, brought tlie
traveller to the fine town of Boi-covicus, perhaps, after Pons ^Elii,
the largest on the wall, the very extensive remains of which are
found at a place now named Housesteads. He was now among
the hills, surrounded with magnificent scenery, and might con-
template in the distance the rugged mountains which sheltered
the northern enemies of Eome. A little to the west of Borco-
vicus, he left the wall to proceed a short distance south, to the
town of Vindolana, the site of which is now marked distinctly
by tlie remains of walls and houses at Chesterholm. He tlien
regained the wall, and arrived at ^Esica, the walls of which are
still seen at Great Chesters. The wall now again ran its course
through the mountains, in some places rising up or descending
precipitous heights, which struck the traveller with astonishment
and even with terror. The ground was unfit for towns, and the
next he came to. Magna, was built a little to the south of the
wall, on the ground belong at a place now called Carvoran, on
a little river, and by the side of a high road which ran south-
ward to the town of Aliona, which is believed to have stood at
Whitley Castle, about two miles to the north of Alston, and
northward into the country betu^een the two walls. Hence,
follow^ing the valley, the traveller came soon to Amboglanna, a
larger town, of which there are very extensive remains at Bird-
oswald, in a rich valley on the river Irthing. Further on, a
little south of the wall, stood Petriana, at a place now called
Cambeck Fort, and a short distance south-east of this, on a road
which led from Magna direct to Luguballium, thus avoiding
the circuit here made by the wall, Wiis another station, named
Bremetenracum, the intrenched area of which is supposed to be
still traced in the park at Brampton. The next town on the
wall was Aballaba, supposed to have stood at Watch-cross, though
its site is not quite certain. The traveller, in following the
course of the wall, now passed successively the towns of Con-
gavata, near which the wall joined the city of Luguballium,
Axelodunum, Gabrosentae, and Tunnocelum, where it ended
on the coast of the estuary of Ituna {the Solwai/ Frith). The
last-mentioned town is supposed to have occupied the site of
Bowness ; the others are doubtful, but they have been placed by
conjecture at Burgh-upon-Sands and l)nind)urgh. A road from
Luguballium led through a series of tou^ns which were evidently
CHAP, v.] CAMULODUNU.\r. 159
connected with tlie wall as a system of defence an'ainst tlie in-
cursio.is of the northern barbarians and their allies from Hibernia.
This road proceeded from Lngnballiuin to Olenacum, which is
supposed to have been the strong* station now seen at Old Carl-
isle ; Virosidum, supposed to be identical with the Eoman r^;-
niains at Marvport and the adjacent village of EllenborouL!;h, on
the coast of Cumberland ; and Glanovanta, the site of which is
more doubtful.*
The stranger who was desirous of visiting the eastern districts
of Britain, the old territory of the Trinobantes and the Iceni,
might have proceeded from the south to Lindum by a more
circuitous route. Leaving the great northern road soon after
it quitted Londinium, he proceeded by a road wliich took an
easterly direction, till he reached a town named Durolitum, or
Durositum, which is believed to have stood near Romford in
Essex. The next town he came to was called Csesaromagus,
and is generally identified with the modern Chelmsford. Cano-
nium, whi{;h followed, is usually placed in the vicinity of Kelve-
don, on the river Pant. From thence the traveller approached
tlie grand city of Camulodunum, or, as it is called in the Itine-
rary, Camalodimum, the capital of the British princes after they
had submitted to the Romans, and the first Roman city in the
island which was honoured with the rank of coloula. History
speaks of its temples and public buildings ; and if, at any earl;
period of its history, it was exposed to attack without walls of
defence, that want was so well supplied at a subsequent period,
that the ponderous masonry of its walls has endured to the
present day, and ought never to have allowed anybody to hesitate
in placing the site of this ancient city at Colchester. f A few
* No district in England is so interesting for its antiquities as that of the
wall of Hadrian. It has been made the subject of an excellent and most
instructive volume, by the Rev. J. CoUingvvood Bruce, of Newcastle-upon-
Tyne, under the title of ' The Roman Wall : a historical, tt)pographical,
and descriptive Account of the Barrier of the Lower Isthmus, extending
from the lyne to the Sol way, deduced from numerous personal Surveys.'
The Wall district shows us in a remarkable manner the effect of modern
cultivation in destroying ancient monuments. From Newca.stle to the
ancient Amboglanna {Birdosivald), which extends over a wild and insecure
country, the stations and posts are easily identified, and buildings of all
kinds lie in masses of ruins, which are only slightly cohered by the accu-
mulation of earth. To the west of Amboglanna, the country has been more
highly cultivated, and the plough has so completely obliterated the trace of
Roman work.s, that we can only guess at the sites of ancient towns, and
the positions of all the western stations of the wall ai'e very doubtful.
t The only good a(T-(»unt of the Roman antiquities of Colchester will be
found in a paper by Mr Roach Smith, in the ' Journal of the Archaeological
Association,' vol. ii. p. 29.
IGO THE ROMAXS. [chap. v.
miles to the north of Caimilodiinum, the road crossed the river
Sturiiis {Si our), where there was a station called Ad Ansam,
snpposed to liave stood on the site of the present village of
Stratford. The traveller then proceeded by longer stag-es to the
towns of Conibretonium and Sitoinagus, which are conjectnred
to have stood at Bnrgli, near Woodbridge, and at Dnnwich, on
the coast. The conrse of this road is, however, at present very
uncertain, and we only know that it ended at the eastern Yenta,
or Venta of the Iceni, which, there seems no reason to doubt,
stood at Caistor, near Norwich. From Yenta the Itinerary
brings us, without any intermediate station, to Camboricum,
which occupied the site of the modern town of Cambridge.
Another road from Colchester led by Yilla Paustini, the position
of which seems to be exceedingly doubtful, to Iciani, a town
which has been conjectnred, perhaps only from a fancied resem-
blance of name, to have occupied the site of the modern Ickling-
ham, and in that case the road seems there to have joined the
other road from Yenta to Candjoricum. There Avas also a direct
road from Camulodunnm to Camboricum, of which the Itine-
raries give no account. Camboricum w^as w^ithout doubt a very
important town, which commanded the southern fens. It had
three forts or citadels, the principal of Avhich occupied the dis-
trict called the Castle-end, in the modern town of Cambridge,
and appears to have had a bridge over the Cam or Granta ; of
the others, one stood below the town, at Chesterton, and the
other above it, at Granchester.* Numerous roads branched oft"
from this town. One of these proceeded to Durolipons (God-
ma/i Chester), where it joined the great north road, and proceeded
by it to Lindum. Another ran north into the Pens, towards
Ely and Lynn. Others proceeded to Yenta of the Iceni and to
Camulodunmn. Another proceeded southward to London,
having stations at Chesterford and perhaps at other places in its
course. Lastly, a continuation of the road from Yenta ran in
a south-w-esterly direction towards the fashionable districts of
Gloucestershire ami Somerset. Bede calls the representative of
Candjoricum, in his time, ' a little deserted city,' and tells us
how, when the nuns of Ely wanted a coffin for their saintly ab-
bess, Etlieldreda, they found a beEuitiful sculptured sarcophagus
of white marble outside the city walls of the Roman town.f
* A very valuable essay on the Roman antiquities of Cambridf^e, and on
the Roman roads branching from it, by a well-known and distinguished
antiquary, Mr C. C. Babington, was published by the Cambridge Anti-
quarian Society, 8vo. 1853.
t ' Veuerunt ad civitatulam quandam desolatam, non procul indo sitam,
CHAP, v.] WESTERN TOWXS-GLEVUM. ir.i
If the traveller, wlieii he entered Britain, desired to visit the
■western parts of the island, he left Londiniuin by its western
gateway, and proceeded along" the great road, leading througli
the present towns of Brentford and Honnslow to Staines, where
it crossed the Thames over the bridge, from which the Roman
town at this place took the name of Pontes. Having here
passed the river, the traveller came to a town named Bibracte,
the position of Avliich is not known, and then continued his
way through a rich and varied country to the great town of
Calleva, the walls of Avhich, as they still remain at Silchester,
on the northern border of Hampshire, enclose an area three
miles in circuit. Thence he proceeded over hilly grounds and
heaths to a town named Spina?, the name of whicli seems to be
preserved in the modern village of Speen, in Berkshire. Tlie
road then carried him over a more level and open country,
after a long stage, to Corinium, a town tilled with magniticent
houses and public buildings, which occupied the site of the
modern Cirencester. Some of the richest and most elegant
mosaic pavements in tiiis island, dug up here, show its ancient
splendom*.* Another stage conducted the traveller over the
hills to the large colonial city of Glevum, now represented by
Gloucester.
Glevum was a town of great importance, as standing not
only on the Severn, near the place where it opened out into the
Bristol Channel, but also as being close to the great Eoman
iron district of the Porest of Dean. A road passed the Severn,
and ran north-westward over the hilly country on the east of
the forest to the town of Ariconium, the great station of the
iron manufactures of this district, a tine position, commanding
an extensive prospect over the surrounding country. Its site
is now called Weston, at a short distance to the south-east of
Ross. The road proceeded hence across the beautiful country
on the banks of the Wye, among hills covered with cinders and
iron furnaces, to the town of Bbstiuni, which antiquaries agree
in placing at Monmouth, on a bend of the river. Thence the
old road, continuing nearly in the same direction, carried the
traveller to Burrium, another considerable town, the remains
quie lmp:ua Anglorum Grantacestir vocatur ; et mox invenerunt juxta
muros civitatis locellum de niarmore albo pulcherrime factum, operculo
quoque similis lapidis aptissiiue tei;tuin.' — Bedce Hist. EccL, lib. iv.
c. 19.
* See the recently published work on the Roman antiquities of Ciren-
ooHter, by Messrs Buckman and Newraarch, entitled ' Illustrations of thti
llomains of Roman Art, in Cirencester, the site of Aucieat Coriuium.'
162 THE ROMANS. [cnAP. v.
of wliicli have been found at Usk. This heantiful conntrv, aiul
all the southern coast of Wales, were well inhabited. After a
short sta<4-e the traveller arrived at the g-rand city of Isca, the
head-quarters of the second leg-ion, remarkable for its theatre,
its temples, and its palaces.* It stood on the river Usk, in a
deep bottom, surrounded by lofty lulls. Part of its massive
walls still remain at Caerleon. The road proceeded hence to a
station on tlie banks of the river Tibia \tlie Taaf), which it
crossed, and continued its course to the town of Bovium, which
is supposed to have stood at Ewenny, and to that of Nidum,
the name of which appears to be preserved in that of Neath.
A shorter stage than the two last brought the traveller to the
town of Leucarum, the name of which is again preserved in the
village of Llychwr, on the borders of the counties of Glamorgan
and Caermarthen. Another stage conducted him to the more
important town of Maridunum, finely situated on a beautiful
river. Its site is occupied by the modern town of Caermarthen. f
Twenty Eoman miles further west was a station, which was
probably of too little importance to have a name of its own, r.s
it is simply designated in the Itinerary as Ad Vigesimum,
which we may translate ' at the twentieth milestone.' Its
site is supposed to be the spot now called Castle Flemish.
The traveller next arrived at the town of Menapia, represented
by the modern city of St David's, on the point of the pro-
* A large portion of the buildings of Isca seem to have been standing in
the latter part of the twelfth century, when Giraldus wrote. He speaks oi
splendid palaces, a gigantic tower, public baths, a theatre, temples, sub-
terranean buildings, aquteducts, or sewers, and he remarks the ingenious
method of warming the houses by means of hypocausts ; ' Erat autem h;ec
urbs antiqua et autentica, et a Romanis olim coctilibus muris egregie con-
structa. Videas hie multa pristinae nobilitatis adhuc vestigia ; palatia
immensa aureis olim tectorum fastigiis Romanos fastus imitantia, eo quod
a Romanis principibus primo constructa et sedificiis egregiis illustrata
fuissent ; turrim giganteam ; thermas insignes ; templorum reliquias ; et
loca theatralia muris egregiis partim adhuc extantibus, omnia clausa.
Reperies ubique, tarn intra muroruni ambitum quam extra, aediiicia sub-
terranea, aquarum ductus, hypogeosque meatus. Et quod inter alia notabile
censui, stuphas undique videas miro artificio consertas, lateralibus qui-
busdam et pra^angustis spiraculi viis occulte calorem exhalantibus.' —
Girald. Cainh.., Itiner. Camhrixe^ lib. i. c. 5. Recent discoveries of con-
siderable interest, made on the site of Isca, have been described by Mr
John Edward Lee, of Caerleon, in a quarto volume, entitled * Delineations
of Roman Antiquities found at Caerleon,' and in a supplemeatary volume,
entitled ' Descripticm of a Roman Building and other Remains lately dis-
covered at Caerleon.'
t The Roman walls of Maridunum were partly standing in the time of
Giraldus Cambrensis, who says : ' Est igitur haic urbs antiqua coctilibus
muris partim adhuc extantibus egregie clausa. —/^i>i. Cainb.^ lib. i. c. 10.
CHAP, v.] THE WELSH BORDER. 163
montoiy called by Ptolemy Octopitarvim Promontoriinn. Tin's
was one of the ports from wliicli ships passed over into Ireland.
Prom Burriuin, a branch road turned off to the north-east,
and carried the traveller towards the mountains of the interior
of Wales, until he reached, at the foot of lofty hills, a town of
no great magnitude, named Gobannium, which is supposed to
have occupied the site of the present town of Abergavenny.
Thence, returning eastwardly, he entered a fine open country
surrounded with hills, in the centre of which was a town of
much larger dimensions, which probably, from that circumstance,
was called Magna. Its site is still to be found at Kenchester,
near Hereford, where its tesselated floors are found in digging.
The traveller here joined the direct road which had proceeded
from Ariconium, through the rich country now forming the
county of Hereford, to Magna, and thence it continued its
course northwardly to Bravinium, a Roman town, supposed to
have stood on the banks of the Teme, near the village of
Leintwardine. The road proceeded thence to Uriconium, or
Wroxeter, on the Severn,* and so continued its course north-
wardly. But the traveller might at Uriconium take the north-
eastern road, which has been followed before, to Eutunium, the
modern Rowton, or Ruyton, from whence another branch road
carried him first to a town named Bovium, and, at a later
period, Banchorium, which later name seems to be preserved
in that of the modern village of Bangor on the border of Plint-
shire, and thence to the great city of Deva, the station of the
twentieth legion, the interesting remains of whose labours. are
still found at Chester, on the Dee.
Deva, as may be supposed from its importance, both in a
military and in a commercial point of vicAV, was the centre of
an extensive system of roads. One of these proceeding west-
wardly, carried the traveller first to Yarse, which stood at the
modern Bodfari, the pass tlirough the range of mountains which
bound the Vale of Clwyd, and then to Conovium, a town, of
wiiich the remains are found at Caer-lmn in the vale of the
Conway, at the northern foot of the mountain range of Snow-
don. Another sta^e carried him to Segontium. If the tra-
veller had taken the ^vestern road from Deva, at the end of tlie
first stage, he would have reached the town of Co idate, sup-
posed to be Kinderton in Cheshire. Here he joined the
nortliern road from Uriconium, and proceeded by it to Man-
* See before, p. 150.
164 TUE ROMANS. [chap. v.
€uniiun, now Manchester, and to the important town of Coccium,
the site of which is found at Eibchester, celebrated for its
Roman antiquities.* The next town on this road was near the
sea, and was called, no doubt from the river on which it stood,
Ad Alaunam. Its site is now occupied by Lancaster, lloads
from tliis town and from Coccium met at Bremetonacae, Avhich
has been placed at Overborough in Lancashire. Thence, in one
direction, the road continued straight to Bronovacse, and so
forwards to Luguballium. The other road turned into the lake
district, and proceeded first to the town of Galacum, supposetl
to have stood at or near Kendal, then to Alonae, which has been
identified with Ambleside, at the head of Windermere, thence
to Galava, which is supposed to have occupied the site of the
modern town of Keswick, and so on to Gilanoventa and the
coast towns at the entrance of the Solway.
Prom Coccium a road led eastwardly to the coast, where a
port-town named Portus Sistuntiorum is supposed to have
occupied the site of the town of Freckleton in Lancashire.
Eastwardly from Coccium this road passed over a ridge of hills
on the borders of Yorkshire, where, in one of the passes, was a
station named from them Ad Alpes Penninos, to a town appa-
rently of some importance called Olicana, now Ilkley in York-
shire, from whence there was a road direct to Isurium, and
another by Calcaria to Eburacum. Another road from Olicana
led the traveller back to Mancunium, which also was the centre
of several roads. One of these led eastward to Cambodunum,
which seems to be rightly placed at Slack in Yorkshire, whence
branch roads proceeded to Calcaria and to Danum. We will
return, however, by the southern road to Condate, whence the
road proceeded by another Mediolanum, which is placed at
Chesterton in Staffordshire, to Eteocetum, or Wall, on the
north-western road. Hence a road proceeded south, through
an intermediate station, of which the name is lost, to the town
of Salinas, remarkable then for its salt-works and its salt-baths.f
* An altar found at Ribchester, and now preserved in St John's College,
ranibridge, which has only recently been correctly read, seems to identity
Ribchester with Bremetonacae, in which case the Roman topogra^jhy of
this district requires a new investigation and arrangement.
f In a very curious Latin tract on the marvels of Britain, attached in
manuscript to the pretended history of Nennius, and as old, no doubt, as
the earlier part of the twelfth century, we have an account of a warm
bath at Wich, or Druitwich, the walls of which were built of tiles and
stones, and in which the bather always found the water of the temperature
he wished : * Tertium miraculum ; stagnum calidum quod est in regione
I
CHAP, v.] WORCESTER. 165
Its site has still the same celebrity, and is called Droitwich.
Ptolemy, at a much earlier period of the Roman rule, mentions
a town called Saliiiae, which he seems to place in the south of
Jiincoliishire; but this may possibly be an error of his copyists.
The Salinae of which we are speaking was a place of import-
ance, on account of its salt trade, and several Roman roads are
stOl traced from it ; one of these led eastwardly, by another
town called Alauna, now Alcester, on the river Alne in Warwick-
shire, crossing the river Avon at Stratford-upon-Avon. An-
other road led southerly, from Salinse to a town of which
the name is lost in the ancient Itinerary, but which we can
hardly doubt occupied the site of the modern city of Worcester.
Tliis last place stood on the verge of the iron district, and seems
to have been distinguished by its forges, as Alauna was by its
smiths.* The road next crossed the Avon at a station named,
froui the river, Ad Antonam, and so continued its course to
Glevum. The station on the Avon was the first stage in pro-
ceeding from Glevum to Alauna, and so to Benonae and Ratse,
and to Lindum. The road by Salina3 and Eteocetum was also
continued northerly, to a town called — also, no douOt, from a
river — Ad Trivonam, supposed to have stood at Bury, in the
parish of Bramsion in Staffordshire. Thence the road pro-
ceeded to Derventio, Avhich occupied the site of the hamlet of
Huich, et muro aiubitur ex latere et lapide facto, et in. eo vadunt homines
per oinne teinpus ad lavaiiduni, et unicuique sicut placuerit illi lavachruiu
sic fiat sibi secundum voluntatem suani ; si voluerit lavachrum frigiduni,
erit, si calidum, calidum erit.'
* A very curious legend relating: to the destruction of this town, isg-iven
in the life of St Eg-win, the founder of Evesham, in Capgrave's ' Nova
Legenda Anglife.' The inhabitant>;, we are told, were an arrogant race,
given to every kind of luxury. ' Erat namque juxta Eoveshain ad octo-
milliaria castrum Alnecester, regale tunc mansum, cujus loci habita tores
quanto rerum opulentia et temporalium abundantia affluebant tanto ma2:is
gulce et luxuriaB dediti, studentes avaritise et cupiditati misericordia Dei
se indignos efficiebant.' — They were principally workers in iron, and when
the saint came to preach to them, in contempt of his doctrine they beat
upon their anvils with a great noise. — ' Et cum castrum illud veluti
nemoribus undique consitum conflandi ferrum locus esset aptissimus, et
fabris et ferri exclusoribus maxime replcretur, gens incredula incudes
ferreis malleis tanto strepitu continue percutiebat, ut beati viri sermo nou
audiretur et a castro recedere cogitaretur.' — Upon this, he addressed his
prayers to Heaven, — ' contra artein fabrilem castri illius dominum impre-
catus est.' — And the town was immediately destroyed. ' Et ecce subito
castrum ipsum terra absorbuit, ita quod novo super veteri qualitercumque
rccfdificato usque in hodiernum diem in construetione novarum domorum
in fundamentis antiqua iedificia reperiuntur. Nunquam enim postea in
loco illo aliquis artem fabrilem recte exercuit, nee aliquis earn exercere
vulena ibi v.gere potuit.'
IOC TriE TvOMAXS. [chap, v
Little Chester on the Derwent. The road now entered tlie
g-reat miniiio- district of the mountains of the Peak, and con-
ducted the traveller to the town of Lutudaruin, now Chester-
field, where the metals were brought to be transported to the
south or the north. The road continued its course thence
through the town of Morbium, supposed by some to have
occupied the site of the modern Templeboroug-h in Yorkshire,
to Leg'iolium, and so on to the city of Eburacum. Morbium
was on the western coast, a Not'dla station. It is identified in
Moresby by an inscription recording the Cataphracteridae locatetl
there.*
The central districts of Roman Britain appear to have been
traversed in every direction by cross roads. The traveller, in
his return to the south, when he reached Eteocetum, might
turn by the great road south-eastward towards Londinium, till
he reached Tripontium, whence he turned off, by Benaventa and
Isannavaria, south-westward to the town of Brinavse, which is
believed to have stood at a place called Black Ground, near
Chipping Norton, Avhere considerable remains are found. The
country he now entered was thickly populated, and seems to
have been covered with small towns and elegant villas. Two
of the former stood near together at Bicester and Alcester, in
Oxfordshire. The latter is considered to be the Boraan ^lia
Castra, the next station on this road, which proceeded thence
over Ottmoor to Dorocina, which is identified with Dorchester
in Oxfordshire. Six Roman miles hence the road passed the
Thames to a station which, if we could suppose the number in
the old Itinerary was wrong", might be the post on Sinodun Hill,
Avhich has been celebrated for its antiquities ever since the days
of Leland,t otherwise we must either place it at or near Wall-
ingford. The Itinerary of Richard of Cirencester calls it Tamesis.
Hence the road proceeded direct to Calleva, but the Itinerary
mentions no intermediate station.
The traveller from the metropolis passed through this city on
* Horseby is in error in placing all these towns and stations in ekv e
sequence. There seems to have been a station at Templeborough, but the
name is not known.
+ ' From Walingford to Sinodune a mile and a half. This place is
wonderful dikid about, and stondith on a hille in Barkshir, hanging over
the Tamise. It is yn by estimation half a mile. And withyn it hath
beene sum toune, or, as the commune voice sayith, a castello in the
Britannes tyme, defacid by lyklihod by the Danes. At this tyme it berith
very plentifuUye both barley and whete, and itumismata Jioma/ior?t)n be
ther found yn ploughyng. About this Sinodune beginnith the fruteful
vale of Whitehorse.' — Lela)td'is Jtin., vol. ii. p. 14.
CHAP, v.] TOWNS IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICTS. 167
liis Wcav to tlie western extremities of the island. From Calleva
lie had a choice of two routes ; one led him to the southern
Venta, or, as it was called, from the tribe in whose district it
stood, Venta Bel^•arum, an important town, represented by the
modern city of Winchester. Ilence the same road proceeded
to the post of Clausentnm, now Bittern, on the Southampton
Water, from whence he might sail over to the Isle of Vectis, or
Wiffht. Between Venta and Clausentnm was a small town or
station called Ad Lapidem.* Another road proceeded westward
from Venta to the town of Brigis, or Brig-e, supposed to have
stood at or near ]3roughton, in Hampshire, and soon after leav-
ing this place the traveller approached the commanding fortifi-
cations of Sorbiodunum, surrounding the summit of a bold hill
in the midst of a valley, and now called Old Sarum. The other
road from Calleva ran direct by a town called Vindomis, sup
posed to have stood near Finkley beyond Whitchurch and
St Mary Bourne, over the eastern part of Salisbnry Plain to
Sorbiodunum. The main road, leaving Sorbiodunum, proceed-
ed to a town called Vindogladia, the traces of which are believed
to be visible on the Dorsetshire Downs, near the Gussages, in
the neighbourhood of Blandford. The next town of importance
was Dnrnovaria, now Dorchester, but there appears to have been
an intermediate station, the name of which is lost. The road
now passed nearer the coast, and, after a long stage, in which
there were probably some intermediate stations the names of
which are not known, reached the town of Moridunum, placed
by some at Honiton and by others at Seaton, and then pursued
its course to the western Isca, called, from the British tribe
which inhabited the district, Isca Dnmnoiiiorum, a rich and
important city on the borders of the mining districts. Its repre-
sentative is the modern Exeter, remarkable for the number of
lloman antiquities which have been from time to time dng up
in it. The road next made a bend southward to avoid the
wilds of Dartmoor, crossed the river Durius {the Dart), where
there was a station, arid there appear to have been others
* This place, whicli no doubt received its name from some remarkable
monumental stone which was standing in the time of the Anglo-Saxcms,
was still known by its Roman name in the time of Bede, who tells us how
the two young brothers of Oswald, king of Wight, were carried thither to
be concealed from their enemies— perhaps among the ruins of the ancient
town : ' Ubi cumdelali essent in locum qui vocatur Ad Lapidem, occuleu-
dos se a facie regis victoris credidissent.' — i^tW. Hist. Ecc, lib. iv. c. 16.
The memory of the monument that gave name to the Roman station, seems
to be pieserved in its present name of Stoneham.
IOC
Trie ftn;« « .
!ri
1 br Tvmd CI
■Kslrm 1
OS to
«l «l A I
of \Uc lorn
CHAP, v.] TOW.Xi IN THE SOUL
his way to the \vest<*m extrrv.
he had a choice of '
A enta, or, as it v"<
stood, Veiita IttL
modern city of Wine
to the post of C! ^
Water, from when
Wijjht. l^etween VenU
station called Ad '
from Venta to th^ :
stood at or near ]iTon.
inir this place the travt-lhr apprtjo,
cations of Sorbiod-
in the midst of a \
road from Cailcva ran dir
posed to ltav< *~ '
St Mar\' lioiji
Sorbiodunnm. The i
ed to a town called Vi
to be visible on the 1
thenein^hbonrhoo*!
was Pii , \
an int( 1 II ,_ .
now r»o<;Qp([ jjj
9
169
»■ the towns of
Ixonjan anti-
>uirh, and Vt-r-
it Hiuhfii'lil, in
I'loni A(]u;e
Vvon called Ad
placed at liit-
of the Avon,
Ad Sabrinnni,
distance from
•i"oss the estn-
^t at a station
' 'I -^pot now
■ '■ ui'cat road
I "" iru JKlcn, or
' I press of that
ii;ht him to ;i
distin-^niish it
\ tnta Silnrnm.
^K' mi^Hit pro-
•ulhcni road,
• ''■' Jo Alcnapia;
"I (M)l)annium
't.\ traced across
tolemy^vliirh, from its
'«"«iii(», iiCardi^ranshire,
and thicc in a direc-
Con()V.in and ^e-on-
}Vl|i the traveller
riveic might havu
rst sl|e on this road
ed.
pton
iie fin
•cnsive an massive walls
' ' • The nejstai^re bron^rjit
sented by tl modern Chi-
^ .le river Avonvas a station,
lied, from itt]istance from
ich no traces ^ left to mark
•im to the imp-tant port of
ly be a donblis Pevensev,
li? remains of loman build-
•oss the w..al(ito Novioma-
e in the Roman aa at Pevensev.
I
1G8 THE KOMANS. [chap. v.
where the road crossed the rivers Tamara {the Trnmr), Yohiba
{the Fowey), and Cenia ( the Fal), on its way to the extremity
of Cornwall. This was a wild country, and perhaps thinly in-
habited.
The extensive and rich district between Sorbiodnnum and
Glevum was covered in every direction with extensive and
magnificent villas, marking* it out as the most fashionable part
of the island. In its centre stood a city remarkable for its
splendid edifices, its temples, its buiklings for public amuse-
ment, and still more so for its medicinal baths. For this latter
reason it was called Aquae Solis, the Waters of the Sun, and for
the same cause its representative in modern times has received
the name of Bath. Kemains of the Eoman bathing-bouses have
been discovered in the course of modern excavations. Among
its temples was a magnificent one dedicated to Minerva, wlio is .
supposed to have been the patron goddess of the place.* Prom
inscriptions found at different periods, it appears that military
commanders, high municipal officers, and other persons of rank,
frecpiented this city for the benefit of its waters, and, perhaps, to
mix in its fashionable society.
As might be expected, Aquse Solis was the centre of many
roads, which communicated with every part of the island. One
road went northwardly to Corinium {Cirencester), whence the
traveller might proceed across the island to Lindum {Lincoln),
or he might go to (ji\Q\mn [Gloucester) and to the towns on the
Severn, or he might turn eastward towards London. The road
from Corinium to Aquae Solis continued its course southwardly
from the latter place to another bathing town called Ad Aquas,
and now known by the somewhat similar name of Wells. Here
the road separated into two branches, one of which proceeded
to a town called, from the river on which it stood. Ad Uxellam,
now Bridgewater, and thence to Isca {Exeter) ; the other led by
a town of some importance named Ischalis, now Ilchester, to
Moridunum on the southern coast. The traveller, who woidd
proceed direct from Londinium to Aquae Solis, followed the
western road till he reached the town of Spinae {Speen), where
* The temple of Minerva, at Bath, is mentioned by Geoffrey of Mon-
mouth {Hist. Brit., lib. ii. c. 10), and it was, perhaps, standing? in his
time. The ruins of it were found in the course of excavations for the found-
ations of a new Pump Room, at the close of the last century. A magnifi-
cent volume on the Roman antiquities of Bath, was published by Samuel
Lysons, and forms a part of his Reliquice Romano- jBritannicce. Leland
[Itin., vol. ii. j). 34) describes a considerable number of Roman sculptures
then (in the time of Henry VIII.) built up in the town-walls of Bath.
DiiAP. v.l SOUTH WALES. 169
l\e turned oft' by a branch road which led iiim by the towns of
Cunetio, the site of which has been traced, by Eoman anti-
quities found there, at Polly Farm, near Marlborough, and Ver-
lucio, which, for similar reasons, has been fixed at Highfleld, in
Sandy Lane, near Heddington, to Aquae Solis. From Aquse
the same road was continued to a station on the Avon called Ad
Abonam, or Abona, which seems to be correctly placed at Bit-
ton, and thence to another post on the banks of the Avon,
where it enters the Bristol Channel, thence called Ad Sabrinam,
and believed to have stood at Sea-Mills, a short distance from
]3ristol. Hence was the trajectas, or passage, across the estu-
ary, and the traveller landed on the opposite coast at a station
called Ad Trajectum, supposed to have stood on a spot now
called Severn- Side. He now entered upon the great road
through Wales, called still by the Welsh the Sarn Helen, or
road of Helen, from a notion that a Iloman empress of that
name caused it to be made. A short stage brought liim to a
sti'ongly fortified town, name Venta, and often, to distinguish it
from other towns of the same name in the island, Yenta Silurum.
Its walls are still seen at Caerwent. If he liked he might pro-
ceed hence to Isca {Caerleon), and so along the southern road,
which is called by some old writers the Via Julia, to Menapia ;
but his direct road lay by Burrium (Usk), and Gobannium
{Abergavenui/), whence the Sarn Helen is distinctly traced across
the mountains to the Luentinum of Ptolemy, which, from its
remains that have been discovered at Llanio, in Cardiganshire,
seems to have been an important post, and thence in a direc-
tion parallel to the western coast up to Conovium and Segon-
tium.
One road only remains to be noticed. When the traveller
was at Clausentum, on the Southampton river, he might have
returned eastward along the coast. The first stage on this road
carried him to Portus Magnus, the extensive an(l massive walls
of which are still standing at Porchester. The next stage brought
him to Regnum, a large town, represented by the modern Chi-
chester. Wiiere the road passed the river Avon was a station,
probably a mere posting place, called, from its distance from
llegnum, Ad Decimum, but of which no traces are left to mark
its site. The road then carried him to the important port of
Anderida, which there can hardly be a doubt is Pevensey,
a place remarkable for its imposing remains of Roman build-
dings.* A road went hence across the Wv*ald to Novioma-
* Considerable excavations were made in the Roman area at Pevensey,
+
170 THE ROMANS. [chap. v.
gus and Londhiiiim, having a station in the inidst of the forest,
which from it was called Silva Anderida. The coast road, after
leaving Anderida, proceeded to a post, or station, on the Lymne
river, named Ad Lemanum, and then running across the land to
avoid the low marshes on the coast, about ten miles further it
readied the Portus Lemanis, at the place now called from it
Lymne, where so many interesting discoveries have recently been
made.* The road next passed behind Folkestone, where, though
not mentioned in the Itinerary, there was probably a small town,
perhaps the elevated entrenchments now called popularly Caesar's
Camp, which contained a lighthouse or pharos. At the next station,
Dubrae, now Dover, the pharos itself, within somewhat similar
entrenchments, is still standing. The road now conducted the
traveller to Rutupiae, whence, havhig thus traversed the whole
island, and viewed the excellence of its roads, its flourishing
towns, the highly-cultivated plains of the interior, its forests and
mountains rich in mineral productions and game, he might em-
bark and return to Gaul.
in 1852, under the direction of Mr Roach Smith, and have been described
ill his 'Report on Exc<ivations made upon the site of the Roman Castrum
at Pevensey, in Sussex, in 1852,' 4to, 1858.
* Tbe account of the recent excavations on this interesting site is given
in Mr Roach Smith's ' Antiquities of Richborough, Reculver, and Lymne,'
and in a separate volume by the same well-known antiquary, entitled a
' Report on Excavations made on the site of the Roman castrum at Lymne
in Kont, in 1850,' 4to, 1852.
J
CHAP. VI.] THE ROMAN TOWNS. 171
CHAPTEE VL
A Roman Town in Britain — Its Walls, Towers, and Gates — Materials and
Modes of Construction — The Houses — Their Plan and Arrangement
— The Tesselated Pavements and Frescoed Walls — Method of AVarni-
ing the Houses ; the Hypocausts — The Baths — Windows and Roofs
— Distribution of the Houses in Streets — Public Buildings ; Temples,
Basilica?, Theatres, Amphitheatres— The Suburbs and Burial-places
— Sanitary Arrangements; Sewers, Rubbish-pits. — The Language of
Britain.
We have seen in the precedins: chapter liow thickly Roman
Britain Avas studded with towns, even if we only reckon those
marked in the official Itineraries, which have perhaps come down
to us themselves in an imperfect form. When we look, on one
hand, at the description of Britain in the anonymous cosmogra-
phy of the seventh century, where many names occur that are
not mentioned elsewhere ; and when we consider, on the other
hand, the numerous sites of Roman towns or stations that may
still be traced in different parts of the island, which are not
mentioned in the Itineraries, we are still more struck with the
picture of Roman Britain as it thus presents itself to us. The
English reader of the nineteenth century will naturally be curi-
ous to have some notion of the appearance of these towns, and
of their comparative magnitude and comforts ; and fortunately,
although much remains to be done by the anticjuary in this re-
spect, accidental discoveries have furnished us with considerable
materials for gratifying his wish.
We havK no means of ascertaining the periods at which, or
the circiunstances under which, the Roman towns in Britain
were built. The Roman Camulodunum we know was founded
by a body of disbanded veterans, and the other towns seem to
have been built in the same manner by bodies of troops, Romans
or auxiliaries, as they advanced in the occupation of the island.
We learn from the earlier historians, that, though the troops had
here and there fortitied stations — castiu or cadclla — the towns
172 THE KOMAX.^. [chap. vi.
Avere not suiTonnded Avitli wnlls, &ioh Avas the case with Camii-
lodimum, Londiniinn, and Yerulaminm. But subsequently —
we cannot fix the period, tlioug'li it was no doubt at the time
when the towns rose into political importance — they were all
surrounded with walls, and these walls, Avhicli were so massive
in character that in some instances they liave outlived sixteen
centuries, must have formed so prominent an object in the out-
ward appearance of the town, that they will naturally first attract
our attention.
The more usual form of the enclos\u'e, following- that of the
Eoman camp, was a paralleloo-rara more or less elongated, but
in some cases, especially in large towns, such as Calleva (Sll-
c/iester), Magna {Ke?tckester) , Uriconium {JFroxeter), and per-
haps Durovernum {Canterhury), the walls inclosed an area of a
very irregular form. When the town stood on the coast, or on
the banks of a large river, there were usually walls only on three
sides, the side to the sea or river being open. From their
ruinous condition in modern times, w^e are imperfectly accpiainted
with the altitude of the walls of the Roman towns in Britain.
The Avails of Rutupise {lliclihoromjli), Avhere most perfect, are
nearly thirty feet high, but this was perhaps an unusual eleva-
tion. The Avails of Gariannonum {Burgh in Suffolk), Avhere
they appear to be of nearly their original height, have an ele-
vation of only fourteen feet. The great wall of Hadrian Avas
not above eighteen or nineteen feet high. The highest part of
the Avail at Lymne is about twenty-three feet. At Lymne, the
Avails are about fourteen feet thick ; those at Eichborough are
at the bottom between eleven and tAveh^e feet thick, and diminish
I slightly toAvards the top ; Avhile those at Burgh, in Sufiblk, are
not more than nine feet in thickness
The Avails Avere supported at the corners, and at certain dis-
tances along their face, by toAvers, either square or round. At
Richborough, there Avere round toAvers at the corners, and two
square towers at each side wall. The round toAvers have been
here so entirely destroyed that their existence Avas only ascer-
tained by excavations. The ciit on the next page represents the
lower part of the tower at the south-west angle, as thus brought
to light, Avith a part of the adjacent Avail. It Avill be seen that
the angle of the wall Avas built first, and that the tower, which,
as far as it remains, is a solid mass of masonry, was added
afterwards. The square towers along the face of the Avail seem
to have been attached much in the same Avay ; they projected
only about eight feet from the Avail, and were solid to the height
CU/.F. TI.j
TOWEES AND GATEWAYS.
^7d
of eight foet fVoin the fouiulatiou, after which tliey Averc hollow
in the centre and thev were built into the main wall at tlif^
Wall and Tower at Ricliborouyh {liutujAai).
top. This was probably the case with the round towei's also.
At Burgh Castle the towers are all round, and they are singidar
in their construction. From the foundation to about one half
their elevation, that is, to the height of about seven feet, they
are entirely detached from the wall, but at that height they
become enlarged in diameter, so as to join to the Avail. They
consist of solid masonry, with the exception of a hole in the
centre of the upper surface, two feet deep, and as many wide,
tlie object of which is by no means evident. The towers at
Lymne appear to have been quite solid. The most perfect of
them is represented in the cut on the next page. It remains
about ten feet in height, and seems, like those at Richborough,
to have been built separate from the wall ; the other towers at
Lymne have been segments of circles, joined to the wall. In
other instances we find no round towers, but only square but-
tresses ; at Aldborougli and York these seem to have been small
hollow towers. At Caerwent the Avail is supported by a series
of pentagonal towers or buttresses, perfectly solid, and built up
against the Avail, and not into it, tliough they may have been
attached at the top. At York, the large multangular tower
which occupied one corner of the walls is still standing.
174
THE ROMANS.
[chap. VI.
Each fortress or town had g:enerally one principal entrance
g-ate, wln'ch, for its importance, was usually called the decuman
j^ate {jjorta deciiiiuuia). Sufficient remains of the principal
Tower at Lymne [Portus Lemanis).
t>*ateway have been preserved in very few instances in Eritain to
enable us to understand its form, probably because it was often
composed, more or less, of larger stones, which offered a tempt-
ation to mediaeval builders. At Lymne, the great entrance
gateway stood about the middle of the eastern wall. It con-
sisted of two semicircular solid towers, Avith the gate probably
in a curtain between them. It was raised upon a solid plat-
form of immense stones, and, when recently uncovered, the
stones wdiich formed the pavement bore distinct impressions,
worn by the wheels of the carriages which had passed over
them. Our engraving represents the ruins of this gateway as
they appeared after the earth which covered them had been dug
away. The lower part of the tower on the left was well pre-
served, and the stones of the lower course of the other Avere
in their place when first opened, but they were soon cleared
away or covered, and the tower is only represented by a small
mound of shapeless masonry. The stones, partly displaced,
which formed the platform, are seen in front ; the stones of the
gateway were thrown in confusion in a deep hollow behind.
Some of them appeared by their mouldings to have formed the
c.
o
CHAP. vr. ROMAN TOWN GATES. 177
lintels ; one seemed to be the base of a column, and in others
were found holes still containini»- masses of lead whicli had fixed
the ironwork of the hin<>-es of the ^-ate. On the left is seen
the wall as it joined up to the g-ateway tower. The most
singular circumstance in the structure of this o-ateway was the
manner in which the semicircular towers joined the wall. The
latter was cut off vertically at ri^rht ang-les, and the corner of
the tower joined the corner of the wall, so that the inner flat
surface of the tower was in a line with the outer surface of the
wall. Thus the tower and the wall did not support each other,
and if there was nothing else to strengthen them, an enemy
might have broken his way through the point of junction with
the greatest ease. This, however, is probably to be explained
by supposing that the gate itself was an edifice built of large
blocks of stone, and forming the continuation of the wall, and
that the two towers were only facings or supports to it.
The decuman gate at Richborough was in the middle of the
western wall, and excavations have shown that it also stood
on a platform of large stones. The wall adjoining to it has
been much damaged and broken, but it appears to have been
cut through by a small opening in its whole height, in which
opening a gateway was built of larger stones. There are no
traces of its having had towers as at Lymne. At Pevensey
{Anderida), the principal gateway stood at one corner of the
angular area, and had side towers, as at Lymne. The founda-
tions of the buildings of this gateway have been laid open in
the course of recent excavations. The most perfect example
of a Roman gateway now existing in this country is that called
the Portway gate, at Lincoln, which is represented in our cut
on the next page. It will be seen at once that this difiers
essentially from those we have been describing, and in fact it
is not the decuman or principal gate of the Roman city of
Lindum, but one of the subordinate entrances. The two actual
entrances, one for carriages and the other for foot passengers,
are well preserved, and the wall, running off inwardly at right
angles between them, appears to have formed part of the portal
buildings, containing guard-rooms and other offices. At Col-
chester, Mr Roach Smith discovered verv interestinor remains
of the buildings attached to one of the gates of Camulodunura.
It was the gate on the west side of the town, and consisted of
a chief entrance for horses and carriages, and a subordinate
archway, apparently on each side, for foot passengers. It was
protected bv advanced bastions. The chief entrance was not
i7n
THE ROMANS.
[CllXP. VI.
quite twelve feet wide. The subordinate arcliway on the riffht
hand on entering- is preserved in comparatively a perfect state,
the upper part of it entirely composed of long- tJle?. By the
Roman Gate at Lincoln [Lindum).
su!e of it is a room in the form of a quadrant, twenty-six feet
in length by fourteen in widtli, entered by a large arched door-
way, and which, there can be little doubt, ^vas a guard-room.
At Borcovicus (Housesteads), on the wall of Hadrian, the gate-
ways, especially that on the western side, remain in a state in
which we can easily understand their details. This western
gateway had two portals or passages, with a square guard-room
on each side. Its outer face was level Avith the wall of the
station, and each portal led through a passage which extended
the depth of the two guard-rooms, which were entered by doors
from the passage. At Colchester, the entrance to the guard-
room was not from the passage, but from the interior wall.
' This gateway,' says Mr CoUingwood Bruce, speaking of the
entrance to Borcovicus, ' as well as the others which have
been explored, is, in every sense of the word, double. Two
walls must be passed before the station can be entered ; each
is provided Avith two portals, and each portal has been closed
with two-leaved gates. The southern entrance of the outside
wall has alone, as yet, been entirely cleared of the masonry
CHAP. VI.] W.\LLED TOWNS. 179
wliicli closed it. Tlie jambs and pillars are foriiied of massive
stones of rustic masonry. The doors, if we may judg-e from
the fragments of corroded iron which have been lately picked
up, were of wood, strengthened with iron plates and studs ;
they moved, as is apparent from the pivot-holes, upon pivots
of iron. In the centre of each portal stands a strong upright
stone, against which the gates have shut. Some of the large
projecting stones of the exterior Avail are worn as if by the
sharpening of knives upon them ; this has probably been done
by tlie occupants of the suburban buildings after the closing
of the gateway. The guard-chambers on each side are in a
state of choice preservation, one of the walls standing fourteen
courses high. Were a roof put on them, the antiquary might
here stand guard, as the Tungrians did of old, and, for a while,
forget that the world is sixteen centuries older than it was
when these cliambers were reared.'
Besides these larger gateways, there were posterns and smaller
gateways, moi'e or less numerous, according to the extent of the
walls. At Richborongli there is a well-preserved postern gate,
of a peculiar construction, in the middle of the north-eastern
wall. Tlie gate is covered by an advanced wall, which outwardly
has the appearance of a large square tower. The entrance is on
one side, and runs first by the side of the main wall and between
it and the advanced wall, and then turns at a right angle tlirough
the main wall into the inclosure. It appears to have been open
to the top, without any covering. At Lynnie there appear to
have been several small portals, and some of what were outwardly
semicircular towers had snuJl chambers below.
From the dilapidated state in which the walls of the Eomau
stations in this country now present themselves, we cannot form
a perfect idea of their appearance when entire. The walls of
Chester, and probably those of other places, were crowned with
an ornamental coping, above which perhaps rose battlements.
There is an illuminated MS. of the Psalter in the British
Museum (MS. Harl., No. 603), which appears to belong to the
latter end of the Anglo-Saxon period, and in which, we find
several pictures of walled towns, no doubt either copied from
much more ancient drawings of such objects, or representing
the walls as they were still seen. In either case, though they
are often defective in regard to perspective, and the artist, by a
conventional mode of treating his subject which was common
in the middle ages, represents the buildings of the interior only
by a temple or public edifice, these pictures no doubt give ns a
180
THE ROMANS.
[chap. VI.
tolerably accurate notion of tlie appearance which the walls of a
lloman town must have presented. Our eng-raving represents
a part of one of these pictures, in which the mode of represent-
ing- the sun (Apollo) is peculiarly classical. The serpentine
figure in the interior is intended to represent water running in
two streams from a pond or reservoir. The supporting towers,
with the exception of those of the gateway, are here scpiare, and
they all appear to be, like those in our Roman remains, solid up
to a certain height. The diminishing >of the gateway towers, as
they rise, is also to be remarked. The principal gateway at
Lymne must, when entire, have borne a close resemblance to
tho one in this picture. Another similar gateway is shown in
x--^
Sketch of an ancient Town-wall, from MS. Harl. No. 603.
the smaller cut annexed, taken from the same manuscript. The
supporting towers are here round, still solid at the bottom, and
terminating at the top in the same manner-as those of the gate-
way. The opening at the bottom of the tower to the right is
probably intended to represent a postern entrance, rather than
a low window.
The masonry of Roman buildings in this country is univers-
ally gootl, and the materials well chosen and well prepared.
The town walls generally consist of two parallel facings of stones
and tiles, the interior tilled up with a mass of mortar mixed
with rubble and other materials. The stone for building may
be generally traced to neighbouring quarries ; but if none good
enough is found in the neighbourhood, it was often brought
from a considerable distance. Some of the stone used for build-
ing at Richborough is supposed to have been brought over from
w
CHAP. VI. J
FACING STONES.
13:3
(rnul. The careful and exact manner 111 wliicli even the small
facing- stones of the w.ills are squared, shows them to be tlie
work of excellent masons. In u'eneral, these facing stones are
slightly wedge-shaped, the smaller end being placed towards
the interior of the wall, which seems to have been intended to
give them a better hold on the mortar. In Hadrian's Wall, the
facing stones, which taper towards the inner extremity consider-
ably, are remarkably long in comparison to the size of the face
which presents itself outwardly ; the latter being usually eight
or nine inches by ten or eleven, while the length inwardly is as
much as twenty inches. This was no doubt designed for
strength. The part of the stone exposed to the weather was
cut across what masons call the bait, to hinder its scaling off
by the lines of stratification. The facings of the stones in
Hadrian's Wall are sometimes roughly tooled, or, as it is tecli-
nically termed, scabbed with the pick ; and in some parts of the
line this tooling takes a definite form. Sometimes the pattei-n
thus formed consists of upright, or nearly upright, lines ; at other
Facings of Stones, Hadrian's Wall.
times tlie stone is scored with waved lines, or with small squares,
and Avith other designs. Of the three examples here given, the
one in the middle, which is usually termed diamond-broaching,
is the most common. The masons' marks are often found on the
stones in Eoman buildings, and resemble most closely those of
the masons of tlie middle ages. Sometimes they consist of a
letter, perhaps the initial of the mason's name ; but they are
more usually crosses, triangles, and other geometrical figures.
The cut in the next page represents four of the more connnon
masons' marks on the Wall of Hadria.'.
One of the most remarkable characteristics of Roman building
was the extensive use of bricks, or, perhaps more properly
speakiug, tiles ; for the latter word, as we now understand it,
(ixpresses more accurately the form of the Koman building tiles.
They are always fiat, generally from half an inch to an inch, or
even two inches, in thickuess, and the smaller tiles are generally
N
184
THE ROMi\^'S.
[CKAP, vr.
A ' -. — :>.i --SJ^yi^v,. , I ,
Masons' Marks, Hadrian's Wall.
about seven inches square. But others are found considerably
laro-er, and these are often much longer than broad. The old
writers, such as Pliny and Yitruvius, g-ive exact directions for
the making of tih^s, and in those found in England the clay has
evidently been prepared and tempered with great care , they are
most commonly of a dark red colour, but in others the colour is
much brighter, and tiles of the two colours are mixed together
in a regular arrangement, no doubt for the purpose of ornament.
Our cut on the next page represents a group of the different
sorts of tiles most commonly used in Iloman buildings in Bri-
tain. In front are three ordinary building tiles, of different
shapes and dimensions ; one, taken from the remains of a house
found at Dover {Duhrfe), has four holes, which had been used
in some way or other to fix it in its place. The two standing
i)ehind are flue tiles, for the passage of air or water. These are
always scored, in patterns of great variety, apparently for the
purpose of being fixed more tenaciously by the mortar. Many
of them, for purposes which will be explained hereafter, hav«^
square holes at the sides. The lile ly-iij, ^^^ ^^^ ^^^^ ^'^^^ ^^^^ ^^^
edges turned, or, as it is technically termed, flanged, and was
used principally for roofing, though we find these flanged tiles
employed sometimes for forming the body of drains, and they
are not unfrequently met with in the bonding courses of Avails,
probably when the builders fell short of the regular building
tiles.* The other is a ridge tile.
* An example of this will be found in the cut on p. 1 7+. from Lymne,
wherA there is a row of flanged tiles in the walls adjacent to the tower.
1
OT^A** Vl.j
llOMAN TILES.
1S6
Tlie ordinary building-tiles often bear inscriptions indicating
the troops or officials, by whom, or under whose directions, the
Roman Tiles.
building's were erected. This is especially the case with tlie
diflereut legions. Thus at Chester {Deva) the tiles bear the
Uiune and title of the twentieth legion, leg. xx. v. v. {legio xx.
valens indrix) ; at Caerleon {Isca) and the stations thereabouts,
and in South Wales, we find tiles with the inscription leg. ii.
AVG. {legio il. Aiifjusta) ; and at York
{Ehuracmii) the inscriptions on the tiles
are leg. vi. vict. [Itcjlo ri. victrix), and
'^/EG. TX. msv. {legio ix. Hispanica). At
TiVmne and Dov^r, on the Kentish coast,
the usual inscription on the tiles is CL.
^n\., which is supposed to mean classlar'ii
Britannki, the marines of the British
fleet. The inscriptions on tiles found in
London are more difficult of interpreta-
tion. They read prb. lon, or ppbr. lon,
or as it occurs in one case, p. pii. br.
This latter form of the inscription occurs
on a flanged tile, found in excavations
in the city, which is represented in the annexed cut. The
most probable interpretation is that which explains it as
proprator BritannicB Londlnii^ the Propraetor of Britain at
Londinium. This inscription has thus a peculiar interest, as
Flanofed Tile fruiii
London.
186
THE ROMAXS.
[CHAP. VI.
showing that Roman London was the seat of government of
the province.
The tiles were probably made in the neighbourhood of tlie
buildings in which they were used, and the brick-yards seem to
have been unenclosed, for we find on the surfaces of many of
them the indentations not only of the feet of men, but of a
considerable variety of animals which have passed over them
before they were baked. On bricks found at Wroxeter (Ut'i-
couium), we find the footsteps of several kinds of dogs, of
sheep, of goats, and of pigs. The tile to the right in the
annexed cut, which was found at Wroxeter, has the prints of
the feet of a dog ; the other, from an extensive Eoman villa,
at Linley Hall, near Bishop's Castle, in Shropshire, presents
the impressions of the two shoes of a man who has stood upon
it. They are remarkable for their numerous and large nails.
The tiles found at Wroxeter also present impressions of the feet
of a cow, and of those of apparently a colt.
Homan Tiles with Iinprfssions of Foot.
As stated before, the Romans chose good stones for tlieii
buildings, and squared them and fitted them together witli
great care, and even where the facings of their walls have been
exposed to the air so many centuries, if not injured by the
hands of man, they preserve a remarkable freshness of appear-
ance. But Avherever they have been biu'ied by the accumula-
tion of soil, when the earth is removed the masonry appears as
fresh as if it had been the work of yesterday. Such Avas the
<^ase Avitli the town walls at Lymne, as well as the lower parts
of the walls at Richborough as shown in our cut on p. 173.
(jn the walls of Cilurnum. on Hadrian's Wall, as on those of
CHAP. VJ.]
ROMAN WALLS.
187
Pevensey, the marks of the trowel on the mortar are still dis-
tinctly visible, and our cut annexed shows the reg-ular appear-
ance of the masonry at another station on the wall, Borcovicus,
as it appeared when uncovered.
Wall at Housesteads in Northumberland {Borcovtcus).
This latter is a very o-ood example of Roman masonry. The
woUs, even in houses, liarl generally one or two set-oft" courses
of stone at the bottom. Tliere were two, as we here see, in the
walls of Borcovicus, and tliis seems to have been o-euerally the
case o\L the line of Hadrian's Wall. In some instances the
second course was bevelled off into a moidding-. At Ricli-
borough, as shown in our cut on page 173, there was one foot-
ing course bevelled off in this manner. In the Wall of Hadrian,
as we are informed by Mr Bruce, the foiuulation had been pre-
pared by the removal of the natural soil to the Avidth of about
nine feet. This excavation was at most from fifteen to eighteen
inches deep. On the outer and inner margins of the ground
thus bared, two rows of flags, of from two to four inches in
thickness, and eighteen to twenty in breadth, v/erc generally
hiid without mortar. On these lay the first course of facing-
stones, which were usually the largest stones used in the struc-
ture. In higher courses the facing-stones are uniformly of
freestone, but on the ground course a whin-stone is occasionally
188 THE ROMANS. [ciiAr. vi.
introduced. Tlie flag'- stones of the foandation usually project
from one to five inches beyond the lirst course of facing-stones,
and these again usually stand about an inch or two beyond the
second course, after which the wall is carried straight up. The
foundation of the walls at Richborough is formed of two rows
of boulders, laid upon, or a very little below, the suiface of the
natural soil, Avhich is a compact pit-sand. At Burgh Castle, in
Suffolk, the ancient Gariannonum, the massive walls were
simply built upon the plain ground. The chalk and lime of the
original soil was covered with earth hard beaten down ; upon
this were laid planks of oak nearly two inches thick, and upon
them a bed of coarse mortar, on which the first stones of the
superstructure were placed. Some years ago, one of the round
towers, undermined by a channel cut by continual floods of rain,
was overthrown, and thus the nature of the foundation was
shown, the form and even tlie grain of the oaken planks being-
impressed on the mortar. At Wroxeter [Uriconbi.in), in the
buildings of the town, the walls have very deep foundations in
the ground.
The Roman bricks, or tiles, were not used in construction as
we use them now, to form the mass of the wall, but they were
built in as bonding courses, or used for turning arches, and for
various other purposes of ornament or strength. The bonding
courses of bricks are peculiarly characteristic of Roman masonry
in this country, as well as on the continent. They are shown,
as seen at Richborough and Lymne, in our cuts on pages 173
and 174. In both these localities, the courses consist of two
rows of tiles ; at Burgli, in Suffolk, tliere are three rows of tiles
in eacli course ; and at Colchester there are three and four rows
of tiles in a course. Sometimes they are still more numerous.
In the multangular tower at York there are five rows in a
course ; and the walls of a building in LoAver Thames Street,
London, discovered in 1848, were constructed entirely of tiles
set in mortar, without any courses of stones. At Richborough
the first bonding course of tiles commences at three feet fou.
inches from the surface of the ground at its present level, and
about five feet from the bottom of the wall ; and they are re-
peated upwards at distances varying from three feet three inches
to four feet three inches. The distances between the bonding
courses vary in other places, and they appear not to liave been
regulated by any fixed rule. In some rare instances the rows
of tiles went through the whole thickness of the wall, but
generally they only run one tile deep. They are almost always
CHAP. VI.] EOMAN WALLS. 1S9
multiplied at the angles and turning's of walls. At Ricliborougli,
in the angles, tliere are generally two short courses between
each of the regular courses. In some instances, more especially
in houses and public buildings, the angles of the Avails are com-
posed entirely of tiles. Arches are generally formed of tiles
placed in a position radiating from the centre. In some in-
stances, large arches and vaults are composed entirely of im-
mense masses of tiles placed in this manner, as in the fragment
called the Jury Wall, at Leicester, and in the arched gatcAvay
already mentioned at Colchestcu*.
The system just described was the one generally followed in
Eoman buildings in this country, though there are exceptions.
In the walls of several Eoman towns, as at Reculver {Regnl-
bhtm), Silchester {Calleva), Kenchester {Mogua), Caerwent
{Venta Slluruni), Chester {Leva), and in Hadrian's Wall, and
all the stations adjacent to it, tiles are not used. It is not
possible, with our present knowledge, to assign any reason for
this deviation from the general practice. At Silchester there
are bonding courses of single rows of large flat stones. At
Caerwent, where the walls are faced with limestone, there are
four bonding coui'ses of red sandstone, which when fresh would
look like tiles. Similar variations are found in regard to the
stone-masonry. The walls at Chester were formed of large
squared stones, and must have had a very noble appearance.
The walls of Burgh Castle and Silchester, and those of Eich-
borough, in the interior, were faced with flints. At Silchester,
the flints were placed in what is popularly called herring-bone
work. The small remains of Avails at Kenchester also exhibit
herring-bone Avork. A^ariations like this arose no doubt from
fashion or caprice Avhich prevailed in particular districts, or was
adopted by certain masons. The herring-bone masonry is often
found in Eoman buildings; and Avas seen in its perfection in
the numerous houses brought to light bv the excavations of ]\Ir
Artis at Castor {Diirobiivce).
The mortar employed by the Eomans possesses several pecu-
liarities ; and Ave leai-n from the directions of Vitruvius, that
the composition of it Avas attended to Avith great care. It
strikes the ordinary observer by its extreme strength and
durability ; he Avill bi-eak Avith much greater ease the stones
tvith Avhich the Avail is faced than the mortar Avhich holds them
together. As Ave find it in Britain, the Eoman mortar is genei'-
ally composed of lime, pounded tiles, sand, and gravel, more or
less coarse, and even small pebble stones. These ingredients
^
190 THE ROMANS. [chap. vi.
vary in tlieir quantities, but usually the lime and pounded tiles
predominate, which is the cause of its exti-eme hardness. Oc-
casionally, as at Silchester, Caerwent, aud Keiichester, the
pounded tiles are omitted, and in common buildings, mortar of
an inferior description is used, composed merely of sand and
N lime. At Richboroug-h, the mortar used in the interior of the
wall is composed of lime, sand, and pebbles, or sea-beach; but
the facing-stones throughout are cemented with a much finer
mortar, in which pounded tile is introduced.*
The mode in whicli the wall was constructed seems to have
beeu as follows. The facing-stones were tirst built up to a
certain height, and set in mortar of a finer and better descrip-
tion. Then fresh liquid mortar was poured in in large quau-
tities in the space between, heaps of rubble or stones were cast
in with it, and the whole soon hardened into a solid mass. In
some instauces, the stones of the interior of the wall are placed
in layers, and are arranged with considerable precision. The
* ' The tenacity of the mortar which was used forms an important
element in the strength of the whole fabric. That which is in use now is
aenerally spoiled, from a variety of circumstances. The prevailin<r prac-
tice is, first of all to slack the lime by pouring a quantity of water upcm it
Avhen lying' in a heap ; in most cases this does not sufficiently pulverize it ;
it is then mixed with any earth bearing the least resemblance to sand, and
the two are worked together very imperfectly with a shovel. The mortar
thus made often stands and hardens, so as to require to be once and again
niixed with water, and worked up before it is used. It thus becomes quite
impoverished ; and after all, for the ccmvenience of the mas(m, it is em-
ployed in so dry a state, that the stone soon takes all the moisture from it,
and it becomes little better than powder. The gigantic railway operations
of recent times have driven men out of the beaten track, and compelled
them afresh to discover the Roman method of preparing mortar. On the
authority of engineei's well acquainted with the Roman Wall, I am enabled
to state, that the mortar of that structure is pi-ecisely similar to the grout
and concrete of the railway mason of the present day. Specimens of the
ancient and modern grout are before me, and there cannot be a doubt as to
the identity of their preparation. The following is the mode in which the
railway engineer prepares his mortar. The lime, in the state in which it
comes from the kiln, is fiist ground to poMder, and is then mixed with
sand and gravel, and chippings of stone. The purposes for which ihe
mortar is required, indicate the coarseness and quantity of the interming-
ling gravel. When wanted as concrete, to form, independently of other
materials, the foundation of some heavy structure, stony fragments of
larger size are mingled with the lime than when the mortar is to be used
to cement chiselled stones, or even than when wanted to constitute, with
rubble, the interior of a wall. The mixture of pounded lime and gravel,
when made, is not mingled with water until the moment of application to
the work for which it is required, but it is then intimately united with an
abundant quantity of it. When used as concrete, the mass will, in thi'ee
hours, have solidity sufficient to bear the weight of a man, and in about
three days it will have acquired a rock-like firmness.' — Brace's '■Roman
Wall; p. 86.
CHAP. VI.] ROMAN MORTAR. H'l
interior of the walls at Lymne is composed cliiefly of the hard
stone of the neig-hbourhood, Avhich has been tlirown into the
mortar in rongli pieces as quarried. In the Wall of Hadrian,
whin-stones, as the material most abundant in the district, were
' puddled in ' amongst tlie mortar to fill up the interior of the
wall. When this had been done, more courses of facing-stones
were built up, and then the interior Avas filled in in the same
manner, and when the whole was finished it formed a solid,
compact mass. In the walls at llichborough, and at other
places, we trace a number of small holes on the face of the
walls, Avhich were probably made to support scaffolding-. In
some cases, where the avails, as in the buihlings at Wroxeter
( Uncoidum) , were not more than three feet thick, these holes go
light through.
In some parts of the Roman walls in Britain w^e observe
irregularities, which seem to have arisen from the accidental
deficiency of particular kinds of materials. In the pharos at
Dover, when the masons ran short of the large tiles which are
so plentifully employed in its construction, they hewed pieces
of the Tolkestone rock into the form of tiles, and used them
instead. In other instances, we find roof or other tiles used
instead of building tiles. An instance has been already noticed,
and will be seen in our engraving of the tower at Lymne,
on p. 171, where, at the bottom of the wall, on the left, tiles
with turned or Hanged edges are used along with the plain Hat
tiles.
Having thus examined the walls, Avith their towers and
gates, let us pass through the latter, and survey the interior.
A to^n consisted then, as now, of its private and its public
buildings, the former of which Avould naturally vary much in
form and magnitude, according to the caprice as well as the
([uality of those for whom they Avere built. The discovery of
the buried city of Pompeii first tlirew any considerable light on
the domestic arrangement of Roman houses, yet difference of
climate, and many other causes, existed in this island which
should make us cautious in applying to Roman houses in Britain
the rules which we know were observed in Italy. The only
instance with which we are acquainted of a small separate house
in a Roman town in this country, is one recently discovered at
Lymne, in Kent, a plan of which is here given. This house,
which stood north and south (the semicircular projection looking
due south), was about fifty feet (east and west;, and thirty feet
in the transverse direction, exclusive of the semicircular part
H»2
THE llOMA^^S.
[CHAT. VI.
and the eastern recess. Tlie walls evidently remain only to tlie
level of what was originally the floors, and we have no indiea-
Plan of a lioiiso at Lymne {Partus Lemams).
tion of the position of doors or windows ; bnt, from an examin-
ation of the motion that mnst have been given to the ruins Ijy
the ancient landslip which rednced them to their present con-
dition,* it is probable that this house stood on the south side
of the street at the entrance of the principal gateway, and
therefore that the entrance-door of the house stood at its
northern wall, Avhich was supported by buttresses. The arrange-
ment of this house was very simple, for it seems that it con-
sisted of four rooms of about the same dimensions. We have
no means of ascertaining whether it had any upper story, but
there seems little doubt that it was a detached house. The
accompanying engraving of Koman foundations laid open at
Aldborough in Yorkshire, clearly represents a long row of
* At some period long after the Roman town at Lymne had been ruined
and deserted, an extensive landslip took place on the site, which is easilj'
explained by geologists, the consequence of which was that a great part of
rhe walls has been overthrown, and much of the interior appears to have
been entirely defaced and destroyed. The house of which the plan is given
above had suffered less than most of the other buildings, and although the
walls were in part dislocated, it was easy to restore them in the plan
9/4
vA m'Mi
v^K'if
</■'
hkmn'
a
CHAP, vr.] ROMAN HOUSES. 195
houses, tlioiig'li tliey are by no means easily explained. The
corner to the left appears to have been a little shop, and the
other rooms in a line with it may perhaps have served the same
purpose.
It has been questioned whether the Roman houses in this
country were built of stone and brick np to the roof, or whether
they were only raised a little above the floor, to support a
superstructure of wood. It is a remarkable circnmstance that,
in most of tlie numerous villas Avliich at different times have
been discovered and examined, the walls are fonnd remaining
about as high, or very little higher, than the floors, and that
tliey do not terminate in a broken line as though the walls had
been thrown down, but in a regular level through the whole
building. We must, however, take into consideration, on the
other hand, the circumstance that the upper walls would, in the
middle ages, be gradually carried aAvay for materials down to
the then level of the ground ; and instances have occurred,
especially in the larger country villas, where the walls remain at a
greater elevation in some parts than in others, and in which they
have evidently been broken away. Walls of timber, too, would
hardly have supported such heavy roofs as those formed of
Hags, and we might expect to find more distinct indications of
them. Perhaps the safest conclusion to which we can come is,
that in houses of people of wealth and importance the walls
were of masonry, while in the more ordinary houses the masonry
of the walls may have risen oidy two or three feet above ground,
and sometimes not so much, to support a superstructure of
timber. In exposed districts, and more especially in the north,
houses of stone were no doubt more common. Mr Roach
Smith discovered a Roman house in the neighbourhood of
Hadrian's Wall, the walls of which, budt of stone, are still » /
standing to an elevation above the doors and windows, the '
openings of which remain.'^
Generally, however, the only parts of a Roman house which
lemain perfect are the floors and snbstructui-e, which, therefore,
will naturally first attract our attention. We invariably find
tliat in a certain number of the rooms of a Roman house in
Britain the floors were supported, not on the solid ground, but
upon a number of short thick columns, arranged in regular
* An engraving of this house is given in Mr Roach Smith's Collectanea
Atitiqna, vol. ii. p. 188.
196 THE ROMANS. [ciiAr. vi,
rows, with narrow passages between them. These formed what
were called the hvpocanst (from a Greek word signifying- liter-
ally ,//*e or heat nnderneath) ; it was the Roman method of warm-
ing a house. Tliese pillars were generally formed of piles of
square tiles ; sometimes, as in a building found at Inverness in
Scotland, described in Stuart's ' Caledonia Romana,' in one
found at Wroxeter [Urlcouuim), and described in the ninth
volume of the ' Archseologia,' and in other instances, the co-
lunms supporting the floor were of stone, or stone columns
mixed alternately or irregularly with brick pillars. Along with
these supporting pillars were rows of flue tiles, chietly against
the walls, and flue tiles of various forms were laid against
the walls above, so as to distribute the hot air over the building.
These flue tiles have square holes on one side to admit hot air
or smoke, from the Arcs of the hypocaust. Sometimes, but this
is of rarer occurrence, instead of these pillars, the floor Avas sup-
ported on parallel walls of masonry, with passages in which the
fires were made, and through wdiich the heat was conducted.
Tlie fire was made under the arch in the outer wall below the
level of the ground, and appears to have been approached from
without by the servants who had the care of the fires, in the
same manner that we now^ approach the stoves of hot-houses.
Similar arches in the foundations of the walls communicated
between the hypocaust of one room and that of another. In
our plan, just given, of the house at Lymne, the two rooms on
the right had hypocausts with pillars of square bricks, the lower
parts of most of which Avere found when the covering of earth
was first cleared awMy. At T and i were the passages, built in
rougher masonry than the walls, which led to the fire-places
under the two arches indicated in the walls. Three other arches,
through the wall which divided these two apartments, all neatly
turned with the large flat tiles, formed the connnunication be-
tween the hypocausts. Another similar arch in the Avestern
wall of the moi-e northerly of these two rooms communicated
with the parallel walls of rough masonry which formed a hypo-
caust under a part of the room marked b. The small recessed
room at the south-eas-t corner, supported by much thicker
columns of bricks than those of the other hypocaust, may per-
haps have served as the kitchen, or cooking room. The ar-
rangement of the hypocaust will perhaps be better understood
by the annexed cut of one of these structures found in a Roman
house at Cirencester, which ^ve give because it presents several
CHAP. VL]
ROMAV HYPOCAUSTS.
197
peculiarities. One of the supports here is a stone pillar, another
stands upon a stone base. Between the last row of pillars and
Hypocaust at Cirencester [Coi inium).
the side-Avall, is a row of npright flue-tiles, and in the wall itself
are two apertures, intended no doubt to convey the hot air iiilo
the upper part of the building;. In this instance the hypocaust
only extended under one half of the room, the pavement of the
other half resting upon a prepared solid foundation.* The room
marked B, in the plan of the house at Lymne, seems to have
had a similar arrangement in this respect. The more we
* We should avoid giving refined and unnecessary explanations where
very simple ones are sufficient. In Messrs Bucknian and Newinarch's
woric on the Roman remains at Cirencester, from which our cut of the
hypocaust is taken, the circumstance of the hypocaust extending under one
half only of the floor, is explained by considering that ' the two parts of
the room were intended for use at different seasons of the year, and that it
vfK^ t\iQ tricliiiiHm oi the house ; that portion over the hypocaust being
the triclinium hybernu))), and the other end the tricliiiinm (cstivumior U'^e
in warm weather.' It seems to nie very easy to understand how a room
may be perfectly well warmed by a hypocaust on one side only, but I do
not perceive how this arrangement would make one half of the room warm
and the other half cold, which I presume is the meaning of this explana-
tion. If there were in summer no fire in the hypocaust, it would be quite
as cool over it as on the other side of the room ; and if there were a fire in
it, no part of the room could be cool.
198 THE ROAfAXS. [(-hap. vi.
examine tlie remains of Eoman building-s in Britain, the more
we are struck with the care and ingenuity displayed in pro-
viding- for internal warmth, as well as for other comforts. In
many instances, the subterranean hypocausts are elaborately
arranged. The excavations in the large villa at Woodchester,
in Gloucestershire, at the latter end of the last century,
brought to light a hypocaust which is represented in an engrav-
ing in our next chapter. It consisted of parallel walls, pierced
with an elaborate system of flues, formed of ridge tiles placed
two and two together, so as to form pipes. Eows of flanged
tiles were placed along the sides of the -walls, thus making hol-
lows through wdiich the hot air was distributed equally over the
whole interior surface of the walls of the apartment.
In laying the floors, a layer of large flat tiles was first placed
on the columns of the hypocaust. Flanged tiles were not un-
frequently used for this purpose, with the flanged edges some-
times turned upwards and sometimes downwards, perhaps
according to the caprice of the builder. Sometimes there were
two layers of tiles, and in some cases, where tiles were probably
not at hand, thin flag-stones were used instead. Upon these
was laid a mass of flue mortar or concrete, generally about six
inches thick, in the surface of which the pavement was set.
This pavement was variously constructed according to the
richness and elegance of the house, and to the purposes for
which the apartment Avas designed. In rich houses the principal
floors were beautifully ornamented Avith figured pavements,
composed of very small cubes or tesserae of ditterent colours.
In less expensive houses, the ornament Avas plainer, and formed
of mucli larger tesserae. Ordinary floors Avere usually paved
Avith tesserae of brick, Avhich Ave should perhaps rather call
small tiles, one or tAvo inches square. In a fcAV instances a
mere floor of flao--stones has been found laid reg'ularlv over the
mass of concrete.
It is quite impossible, in the condition in Avhich the founda-
tions of the Roman houses are found, even to otter a probable
conjecture on the use or objects of the several rooms Avhich we
are enabled to trace by them. We can have little doubt that
the principal rooms Avarmed by hypocausts Avere those in Avliich
the masters of the house Avere accustomed to assemble together,
or receive visitors. In the larger country villas it has been ob-
served that the rooms Avith hypocausts lie often on the southern
part of the building, and it has therefore been assumed that
they were the Avinter apartments, while the summer apartments
rkAP. VI. 1 ROOMS OF A HOUSE. .y9
were placed with a more northern aspect, and were without
hypocausts ; but this observation does not liold good in all
cases. There is one peculiarity Avhicli is observed almost in-
variably in Eoman houses in Britain ; one room has always a
seniicircidar recess or alcove, and in some, but rarer, instances,
more than one room possesses this adjunct. It is not omitted
even in the little house at Lymne, of which we have given a plan.
There is, generally, as in the example just cited, at each side
where it joins the room, an advancing piece of wall or pier, as
though a curtain, or something of that kind, had been drawn
across to separate the recess from the room. In a suburban
villa, which was partially excavated in Leicester {RatcB), a shrat
pillar was found lying upon the tesselated pavement of the
semicircular recess, which seemed to have served as an altar, or
to have supported a small statue, and it has been conjectured
that this recess served as the sacrarium, or place of domestic
worship, where the image of the patron god of the family was
placed. A Roman house of any extent generally presents to
view such a numerous assemblage of crowded and very small
rooms, that w^e are led to believe that some of the transverse
walls have only been raised to a slight elevation above the floor,
and that they served for seats or other purposes in the middle
or at one side of the room. In one or two instances low pro-
jections have been observed in the interior of the wall of a room,
which have every appearance of having been intended for stone
seats. Drains and gutters are often found in and under the
floors, for carrying off water, and these are sometimes ingeni-
ously, and even elaborately, constructed ; generally of tiles ;
pieces of leaden pipe have also been found, formed by turning
a thin plate of lead rounded into the form of a cylinder.
]\Iany writers have concluded hastily, that every house with
a hypocaust was a public bath ; but it required very little
observation and comparison to expose this error. In some
instances, but more especially in country villas-^ we find baths
belonging to the house, generally \\\ a room \\^hich seems to
have been set aside for them. Two such baths were observed
in the villa excavated at Ilartlip, in East Kent. One of these,
which is represented m the cut annexed, was of very small
dimensions, being only three feet six inches in length by three
feet one inch in width, and about two feet deep. At the
bottom, on one side, was a seat six inches and a half wide. A
moulding of plaster ran round the floor and up the angles, aiMi
the irterior was originally covered entirely with stucco, pauitea
v^
TEE ROMANS.
(cu*^. "■"
huih. in a Villa at Hartlip, Kern.
of a pink or red colour, as appeared by portions of it stil]
reinaining". From the size of this I ath, it must have bet'ij
Second ButL in the Villa at Hartlip.
intended for partial immersion and ablution; in fact, after
the use of the hot vapour bath, which was usually m an
adjacent room. Adjoining was another bath, i^presented
m our second cut, of larger dimensions than the former.
u .vas six feet two inches in length, by fourteen in wuit.i,
ci:ap. VI.] rATNTINGS OF THE WALLS. 203
but it Avas only fourteen inclies deep. Eotli batlis were J)(m--
liaps deeper when the buildin<>; was perfeet. This bath also
had a seat extending- the whole length of one side, but it was
composed of hollow flue-tiles, placed leiigtliAvays, and coated
over with a thick layer of cement ; the sides, as in the former,
had been stuccoed and painted, and a simdar moulding ran
round the bottom. Both had leaden pipes still remaining,
which condncted the water from the baths through the external
wall of the house. There was no pipe or channel of any kind
for conducting water to either of these baths, so that either hot
or cold water must have been brought when wanted in buckets
or other vessels. A room' adjoining Avas probably open to the
baths ; a recess in the wall of this room is supposed by Mr
Roach Smith to have held a cistern for warm water.
Internally, the walls of the apartments were invariably covered
with a thick coating of plaster, or stucco, composed of lime,
sand, and small stones, so tempered as to harden into a very
solid and firm mass. The surface of this was made perfectly
smooth, and upon it was laid a very thin coating of fine cal-
careous cement. On this, while moist, the various designs
were painted, and the whole became so durable, that on the
broken fragments we pick up among the ruins of the houses
and villas in this country, the colours often look as bright and
fresh as if they had but just been laid on. The accompanying-
engraving, from Mr Roach Smith's valuable work on Roman
London, represents the process of painting the walls in fresco
as sculptured on the sepulchral monument of a Roman painter,
found at Sens in France {SerioiKp). 'The subject,' Mr Smith
says, 'represents the decoration of a corridor in fresco paint-
ing. A low scafi'old is constructed, partly on tressels, and
partly resting upon the basement of the corridor. Upon this
scaffold are the painter and his plasterer. The latter is on the
right side of the relief, and is exhibited in the act of laying on
the thin finishing coat of plaster (mtonaco) for the painter, who
is folloAving him. He has his Jfoat in his left hand, and is
passing it over the wall, while his right hand is thrust downward
into a pail of Avater, most likely to reach a brush to sprinkle
the rough coat or ground so as to render it sufficiently moist to
receive the iutoiiaco, or thin cement of lime, which, in general,
Avould not be thicker than a crown piece. The painter is
following the plasterer, to lay on his colours while the plaster
is still Avet. He appears as if resting one foot upon a stool,
Avliich, p?rha))s, has also a tablet of mixed coloiu's upon it.
o
201 THE ROMANS. [chap. vi.
Peliind him is a cylindrical box, in wliicli, it may be imag-ined,
he has his rolls of paper or parchment with designs of the
work he is engaged upon. There is a short la(hler to mount
the scaffold, by the side of which is a stool, with a tablet of
colour upon it; and close by this clie painter's assistant is
mixing tints; and his action is energetic, no doubt to indicate
liaste. This is quite in accord with the modern practice of
fresco -painting, which requires every department to be con-
ducted with rapidity as well as wdth skill. The assistant must
always have the tints ready mixed, and in sufficient quantity
for the work. Under the arch of the corridor, at the left side
of the relief, is the director or master-designer. He is seated
with an open book or tablet before him, and appears to be
studying or reviewing the design.''^' Some of the fragments
found among the ruins of Koman houses in Britain belong to
w^alls painted of a uniform colour ; others are striped, or made
to represent arabesques and other patterns. Some fragments
in the museum of Mr Roach Smith (now in the British
Museum), taken from the site of a large building near Crosby
Hall, in London, exhibit a sort of decorated trellis-w^ork on a
red ground, in the divisions of which are stars, or flowei's, in
yellow, white, and dark blue colours, with a man carrying a
staff" and wdiat appears to be a basket ; the whole pattern, man
and all, being repeated over the face of the wall, and enclosed
in. a dark border, upon which is a stripe of white. The cut in
the next page represents a fragment of this design, drawn on a
scale of one-third the actual size. Other fragments are painted
ill imitation of coloured marbles. A. considerable variety of rather
elegant patterns were fovmd in the ruins of a Roman villa at
Chesterford, in Essex, among which were some representing
portions of the human figure. The most remarkable of the
latter was the foot of a female, as large as life, with drapery
flowing round it. In one of the larger I'ooms of the villa at
Coml)e-End, in Gloucestershire, the lowei- part of tlie wall
remained covered with the fresco painting, on which were a
row of feet, also as large as life, which had belonged to the
figures in some grand historical painting that had once adorned
the walls of this af)artment. In one of the rooms of a building
at Wroxeter {Uriconium), the walls w^ere tesselated, the tessellre
being half-an-inch by three-fifths in dimension, and of alternate
colours, so as to produce the effect of chequer work.
* Illustrations of Roman London, by Charles Roach Smith, p. 61.
CHAP. VI.] RO:^IAN DOORS AXD WINDOWS. 206
"Where we find the opening's of doors, they are in general
narrow, and they appear to have been sqnare-headed, like tiie
Roman Wall- Painting, from London.
ordinary doors of the present day. Amono; the stations ou
Hadi'ian's Wall, where the materials of the bnildings have not
been so extensively cleared aAvay, ornamental heads of doors
and windows in stone have been fonnd, and some of them are
engraved in Mr Brnce's ' Roman AVall.' We seldom open
llotnan honses of any extent withont finding abnndant frag-
ments of window-glass, so that there can be no donl)t that the
Roman windows were glazed. Some fragments of very thin
window -glass were picked np under the walls of the houses
within the Roman town of Lymne, where the walls had no
doubt been pierced with windows above. At Wroxeter, on the
contrary, the Roman window-glass hitherto found is very thick,
some slightly exceeding the eighth of an inch. We have little
information on the nature of the ceilings and roofs of the
Roman houses in Britain, Supporting columns, and fragments
106
THE ROMANS.
[CHAF. TI.
oC ornamtnt and plaster, found in some of the villas, seem to
show that the more important apartments Avere sometimes
vaulted ; but it is probable that the ceiling was more usually
Hat. In the midland and southern parts of Britain, the houses
appear to have been most commonly roofed with tiles, consist-
iii«i of parallel courses of flanged tiles, with the flanges turned
u] wards, and the joints covered with ridge tiles. This arrange-
ment will be best understood bv
the accompanying cut. In other
cases, especially in the northern
parts of England, the houses were
roofed with slates. In the stations
on the wall, thin slabs of free-stone
slate, with nail-holes in them, as
well as the nails themselves, are
*ound on the ground. Sometimes
the roofing was formed of flags of
stone, shaped into hexagons, as at
fig. b in our next cut, with half-flags {a) for the top. These
overlapped one another, so as to form a pattern of lozenges, as
A-rrangcment of Roof Tiles.
Arrangement of Roof Flags.
i'epresented in the cut, the ridge being no doubt covered with
a row of ridge-tiles. This kind of roof seems to have been
common at Wroxeter {Urlconium), where the fallen Hags are
found scattered about in great abundance, Avith the iron nails
which held them to the woodwork still remaining. These flags,
at Wroxeter, are formed of the micaceous laminated sandstone
found on the edge of the North Staflbrdshire and Shropshiie
coal-field, and must have given the houses a very glittering-
appearance in the sunshine. At Maryport, in Cumberland,
when some parts of the interior of the station were excavated,
it Avas found that the houses had been roofed with Scotch
slates, which, with the pegs that fastened them, 1; y scattered
about in the streets. In the Iloman villas in the soutiv, we
CHAP. VI.] ARRAXGEMEXT OF HOUSES IX STREETS. 207
often find the roofinp; tiles scattered over the floors of the rooms
ill the same manner.
We have few opportunities of examinino; the internal ar-
nngements of a Roman town, and until the uncovering of
l^ompeii, our knowledg-e on this subject was very limited.
Where a modern town stands on the site of an ancient town,
which is the case with most of the more important Roman
cities in Britain, it is of course impossible to excavate ; and
where such is not the case, there have usually been so many
difficulties to contend with in obtaining permission to dig, and
raising the necessary funds, that very little progress has yet been
made. Yet there are many localities in this island, where the
site of an ancient city of great extent lies merely covered
with earth, and that not very deep, and in which excavations
would, no doubt, lead to very interesting results. Among
the more remarkable of these, we may enumerate Silchester
(Calleva), Old Verulam {Vendamium), Aldborough {Isnrluni),
E,ibchester (supposed to be Cocclnni), Caerwent (^Fe)ita,)
Wroxeter* {Uriconiiim), Kenchester {Magna), and some others.
Some of the towns on Hadrian's Wall, though not so large
or magnificent as these great cities, appear, from the com-
parative neglect in which their ruins were left, to promise
perhaps more than some of the larger sites. It has been often
assumed by some that the streets of the Roman towns in Britain
were arranged with great regularity, and by others that the^^
were in general identical with the streets of the modern towns
that occupy their sites ; but both seem equally erroneous. At
Wroxeter (Uricouliim), as far as the excavations have been
carried, the streets appear to have run at right angles to one
another, and to have been tolerably wide. They are paved
with small cobble-stones, like the streets of our mecliaeval
towns. A variety of excavations, however, in the city of
London have proved that the principal streets, such as Cheap-
side, Cornhill, &c., are in almost every instance traversed by
masses of Roman liouses underneath. We have learnt from
the discoveries at Pompeii, that Roman streets were arranged
irregnlarly, and they were there in general narrow. Perhaps
even in Roman London there were only two or three lines of
streets through which any kind of carriage could pass, and
* It need hardly be remarked that very important excavations have
now been made at this place under the direction of the author of the pre-
sent volume; and a volume has been published under the title of ' Uri-
citnium : a Histoi-ical Account of the Ancient Roman City, and of the
Excavations made npni its site at Wroxeter, in Shroj^shire ; ' by Thomas
Wriglit. Londor, 187J.
2Gi
TJIF. iiO.MA>\^.
U'HA}. r:.
the rest were only narrow alleys. A small part oi the Roman
town of Cilurnum, at Chesters in Northumberland, has been
Plan of Houses at Chesters in Northumberland {Cilurnnni) .
uncovered, and presents us with a curious example of these
small alleys and houses. A plan of it is given in the cut
on the present pag-e. Eigiit apartments are here repre-
sented, which belonged to at least two, if not to three,
houses. Descending a few steps at l, we enter a street or
alley, three feet wide at one extremity, and four at the other.
CHAP. VI.] ruiJLiU BUILDINGS. 209
*.r. II, 'inothev straet runs off at right angles, whidi is about
tbur feet wide. At d, an entrance door, approached by steps,
leads into tlie room e, wliich, as well as the other rooms
with Avhicli it communicates, is paved with thin flag-stones,
and has a hypocanst underneath. There is one of the semi-
circular recesses at G, which has an aperture through the
wall, perhaps one of the fire-places of the hypocausts, though
]\Ir Bruce tells us that the furnace, which warmed the suite
of apartments, stood near F, at the south-eastern extremity of
the building. When these hypocausts w^ere first opened, the
soot in the fines was found as fresh as if it had been pro-
(hiced by fires lighted the day before. In the room to tlie
north of that we first entered, at c, was found a bath, in good
preservation, covered with stucco, which was painted red.
Near it, at b, the exterior wall of the house had been broken
in, and among the rubbish was found the statue oi' a river god.
The pavements had been damaged by the falling in of the roof.
The steps at d were much worn by the tread of feet, and stones
had been inserted in place of others which had been worn out,
which also were partially worn; hence Mr Bruce thinks that this
was a public building of some kind. Outside the circular recess,
A, there seemed to have been a larger open space than the street
first mentioned. A door nearly opposite that at d led into the
house I, of which two apartments were uncovered, both having
similar floors and hypocausts. The street h d appears to com-
municate by a narrow passage with another transverse sti'eet, but
the ground beyond has not been cleared away. The rooms of
the house i are in dimension each abont twenty-four feet by
seventeen ; that at E about nineteen feet by fifteen. The walls
of the latter house had been covered internally with a stucco
painted dark red.
At Maryport, in Cumberland, where excavations were made
in 1766, the streets were found to be paved, like those at Cilur-
num, with large flag-stones, wliich we are told ' were much worn
by use, particularly the steps into a vaulted room, supposed to
have been a temple.' The foundations at Aldborough, repre-
sented in our plate, at p. 193, seem evidently to have belonged
to a row of houses, apparently Avith shops in front ; but-the artist
has, by an oversight, represented them as parallel to the town
wall, whereas in reality they are at an angle to it. They have
not been excavated to any extent backwards; but there are
reasons for supposing that in the more impoi-tant towns,
the great dwelling-houses stood, as at Pompeii, back from
210 THE ROMANS. ' [chap. vi.
the street, and tliat each was inclosed ontwardly with small
honses and shops. At Durol)nvfe {Castor), as far as we can
jud^-e fi'oni Mr Artis's plan, the honses were scattered abont in
no regular order.
The nnmerons pieces of sculptured stone Avhich are found
about the ruins in the remains of Roman towns, show that the
houses did not want in architectural ornament. Capitals and
shafts of columns, cornices, moulding's, and other fragments, are
frequently met with ; but as these materials were in after times
much more usefid, and more easily carried away, than the
masonry on the walls, it seldom happens that there is a sutHcient
quantity left to enable us to form a notion of the manner in which
the bidldino- was adorned. It is remarkable, also, that these
architectural fragments, although often very elegant, are seldom
of pure style ; instead of plain or simply fluted columns, we
often have them covered with scales, or leaves, or other designs,
as if the models had been brought from Egypt or India ; and
the bases and capitals are sometimes profusely ornamented. The
same circmnstance of the utility of the materials caused the
public buildings to disappear sooner than the dwelling-houses,
and there are iew cases in which they have been distinctly
traced out in modern times. Lysons discovered so many archi-
tectural fragments of the Temple of Minerva at Aquae Solis
{Bath), that he was enabled to make a restoration of the build-
ing.; and considerable remains are said to have been found, and
perhaps still exist under-ground, of the temple of the same god-
dess at Coccium {Rlbcheder). No doubt, every town had its
temples, of greater and less raagniticence, which were tilled with
the votive altars that are discovered so numerously in some
parts of the country. A few inscriptions have been found re-
cording the building or repairing of such editices. At Regnum
{CJilchester), a temple was dedicated to Neptune and Minerva.*
At Condercum, on Hadrian's Wall {Bemoell), an officer stationed
there ' rebuilt from the ground ' a temple dedicated to the
Dere Matres, and to the genius who presided over his troops. f
At Cilurnum {Chesters), a temple which was dilapidated through
age, was rebuilt in the year 221, during the reign of Helio-
gabilus.| At Petriana {Cambeck Fort), a temple to the
* See the commemorative inscription in our note on p. 51.
t MATRIHVb .... TEMPLVM A SOLO KESTITVIT. — BrUCe" S ' Wall,
p. 140.
X TEMPLVM VETVSTATE COXLAPSVM RESTITVEllVXT. — BrUCe, p. 186.
CHAP. VI.] rUBLIC BUILDIXG?. 211
deities ' of all nations,' whidi had througli r.gc fallen into
deoay, was similarly restored.*
Such slabs were generally placed against the walls of the
building they commemorated, and it was not always thought
necessary to describe in them the nature of the building itself,
so that they are now often useless for identification. Yet in
some instances public buildings are commemorated by name.
Thus an inscription found at Habitancum {Risingham), comme-
morates the restoration of the gate and walls. f We learn also,
from such inscriptions, that at Epiacum {Laiichester), the pub-
lic baths and basilica (or court-house) were built from the
foundations in the reign of Gordian ; % that some other build-
ings (the name is partly obliterated), Avith a basilica and temple,
were built on the site of the modern Tynemouth ; § that public
baths and a basilica were rebuilt at Coccium {Ilihchestei') ; ||
that the public baths at Lavatrae {Bo?ces) had been burnt down,
and rebuilt and dedicated to the goddess Fortune (they were
probably joined with a temple), under the propraetor Virrius
Lupus ; IF and that, at the Reman town which occupied tlie
site of Netherby in Cumberland, a basilica for riding, which
appears to have taken some time in building, avcs completed imder
Severus Alexander (a.d. 221 — 235).* * As well as its basilica
and public baths, Epiacum {Lanchedei') had an arsenal and a
building for the commanding officer, or governor's lodgings. ft
It appears from these inscriptions that every town of any
importance had a basilica, or court-house, and public baths,
and that these were usutdly placed together, and joined often
with a temple. In several of our ancient Roman towns, as at
Leicester, and, formerly, at Kenchester, masses of masonry
within the town, which it has not been easy to account for,
may have formed part of these combined buildings. Remains
* . . . OMNIVM GEXTIVM TEMPLVM OLIM VETVSTATE COXLAUSVM. —
llorsley.
+ PORTAM CVM MVRIS VETVSTATE DILAPSIS. — BvUCC, p. 331.
X BALNEVM CVM RASILICA A SOLO INSTKVXIT. — Li/SOItS.
§ . . . . GYRVM CVM RASI ET TEMPLVM FECIT. — BniCC, p. 319, SO
i>^;id by Mr Bruce ; Hoi'sley read it cvrvm ; but on examining- this altar,
wliieh is in the collection of the Society of Antiquarians, with Mr Roach
Smith, I agree with him that the true reading seems to be cypvm (for
cippuiu) CVM BASi ET, &c. The stone is much worn in the upper part.
II RALINEVM RKPECT . . . ASILICAM VETVSTATE COXLABSAM SOI.O
Restitvtam. — Whitakcr.
^ BALINEVM VI IGNIS EXVSTVM. — HorsJe;/.
* * BASILICAM EQVESTREM EXERCITATORIAM lAMPRIDEM A SOLO
COEPTAM AEDIFICAVIT CONSVMMAVITQVE. — Ll/SOi/S.
t t PRINCIPIA ET ARMAMENTARIA CONLAPSA RESTITVIT. — LyS0}iii.
"in THE ROMANS. [chap. vt.
of public baths liave been found in excavations iu some of tlie
Roman towns in Britain, as, for instance, at Silcliester. The
basilica and public baths of Uriconium {Wroxeter) have been
uncovered; the former was 226 feet long, and the batV?
covered a square of about 200 feet. Of other public buil'lino's
we know little. Giraldus Cambrensis speaks vaguely of build-
ings for theatrical purposes at Caerleon, but perhaps he only
meant the amphitheatre. A theatre of considerable extent,
and elaborate construction, has been brought to light at Yeru-
lamium (near St Albans).* A theatre has also been found at
Wroxeter. The Romans were everywhere passionately addicted
to gladiatorial exhibitions, and almost every station had its
amphitheatre. We need only mention those at Richborough,
Colchester, Silchester, Dorchester, Cirencester, Wroxeter, and
Caerleon. The amphitheatre at Richborough has been recently
excavated, and it was then found that it was not, as had been
supposed, a mere raised circle of earth, but that it had been
surrounded with walls, and had doubtless seats and passages
of masonry. The same was probably the case with the other
amphitheatres just referred to. At Aldborough there are
remains of a stadinm, and perhaps also at Leicester.
The walls of the Roman towns in Britain varied much in
extent. Those of Silchester, which are three miles in circuit,
inclose an area of about a hundred and twenty acres; th.3
Avails of Wroxeter are upwards of three miles in circuit ; those
of Kenchester inclosed about twTnty-one acres ; the walls of
Colchester included a hundred and eight acres ; wdiile the walls
of Lymne inclose only twelve acres, and those of Richborough
not more than four. It is evident that, in cases like the latter,
we must consider the fortress as a mere citadel, and suppose
that the town stood around. In the other instances, the wa,.'.'
surrounded the town. In many cases, however, the popula-
tion became gradually too large to be contained within the
inclosure, and then suburbs were built outside. Most of the
stations along Hadrian's wall appear to have consisted of an
inner town and an outer town. There are reasons for believing
that the walls of Roman London were erected at a later date,
when that city had reached its full extent, and hence we cannot
trace that it had any suburbs on the northern side of the
Thames ; but it had apparently a large one on the southern
* An account of this discovery was published in a pamphlet entitled
' A Description of the Roman Theatre of Verulam,' by Mr R. Gro\ e
Lowe, of St Albans, under whose care the excavations were carried on.
CHAP. VI.] THE SUBITRP.S. 213
bank. Eburiicum had been probably fortified earlier, and it
had increased more rapidly, and accordingly we find tli:it it
had extensive subnrbs at each of its gates. That on the side
towards Calcaria (^Tadcaster) extended, as we are informed by
Mr Wellbeloved, as much as a mile along the road, and the one
on the road to Isuriiim {Aldboi'ongh) was nearly as long. Ex-
tensive subnrbs have also been traced round Caerleon, and it is
the tradition of tlie place, that the ancient city filled a circuit
of nine miles. Considerable suburban buildings have, in like
manner, been discovered at Leicester.
Tlic suburbs were probably not built so closely as the town
itself, but consisted often of detached villas. They were also
the site of the cemeteries, and the tombs generally stood along-
each side of the road. The principal sepulchral monuments of
the Roman citizens of London appear to have stood outside
Ludgate, where inscribed stones have been found ; but we
know also that there was a large cemetery at the outside of
Eishopsgate. At York, the burial-places were without all the
gates, but the road leading to Calcaria has been called empha-
tically, on account of the great number of interments found
along it, the Street of the Tombs.
Before we quit the Eoman towns, Ave must notice one of
their important features, the sanitary precautions. We have
seen how careful the inhabitants were to keep themselves warm
and dry, and they seem not to have neglected cleanliness.
Traces of pipes and drains are found in their houses, which
were no doubt intended to carry off superfluous water and filth.
AYe have no means of ascertaining how the streets were drained,
but we seldom carry on excavations long on the sites of Roman
towns without meeting with large and extensive sewers. At
Wroxeter one of the streets has a gutter running down the
sides, well formed of hewn stones, and something like those
still found in old towns like Salisbury. A large drain of this
description was found outside the town at Hunnum, on the
Wall {HaUon-CJiesters). 'My informant,' Mr Bruce tells us,
' crept along it for about one hundred yards ; the bottom of it
was filled with hardened mud, imbedded in which were found
a lamp and many bone pins, such as those with which the
Romans fastened their Avoollen garments.' The Roman sewers
at Lincoln are still in good preservation, and are constructed
of excellent masonry. They are covered with large flags of
stone. A smaller transverse drain brought down the waters
from each house. The accompanying cut, representing a part
2U
THE ROMANS.
[chap.
of tlie. interior of one of these sewers, with the mouths of two
transverse drains, is taken from a sketch by ]\lr Roach Smith,
Interior of a Sewer at Lincoln {Lindiini).
who walked up it .nhont a hundred yards. Mr Smith tells me
that the sewers of the city of Treves (tlie Eoman Trevir), sti'i
in use, bear a clos3 reserahirm'^r, to thnse of Lincohi, an'l the^y
are probably of lloraan orio-in.
As far as we can judg-e by existing- remains, water was not
conducted into the Roman houses. It was probably bi'ougdit
by aquecUicts or watercourses to a foinitain or conduit in the
town, whence the inhabitants fetched it in buckets. We learn
from Bede, how St (kithbert Avas shown the extraordinary
Roman fountain at Carlisle, which, no doubt, had supplied the
citizens of Lugubalhum with water. Girahlns Cambrensis
speaks of watercourses at Caerleon, but, as his words are some-
M'hat vague, these may perhaps have been merely sewers. But
on the line of Hadrian's Wall, we still see the curious water-
course which supplied tlie Roman town of ^sica {Great Ches-
ters), and which was worked through a tortuous course of six
miles. In a similar manner, an aqueduct (or rather two
aqueducts), of considerable extent and labour, was constructed
to bring the water from a distant stream to Epiacum (Lanc/i&s-
te?') ; they delivered their water into a reservoir outside the walls,
near the south-west corner of the station, and there, no doubt,
the inhabitants went to take it for their domestic purposes
CHAi-. VI.] IlCJBBISIl PITS. 21.5
One circvimsiance remains to be noticed with regard to the
ecuiioniy of the Iloinan towns. We have as yet discovered no
arrangements about the Roman liouses for personal easement,
but close at the outside of Roman towns are found numbers of
deep and very narrow round wells, which, no doubt, are the
remains of conveniences for this purpose. The discovery of
such wells is the sure sign of the proximity of a Roman station.
They are numerous at Richborough and at Winchester, and
have indeed been observed in many other places, and they are
rich mines for the antiquary, from the great number of mis-
cellaneous articles they contain. In fact, they appear to have
been common depositories for refuse of every description, such
as animals' bones, broken pottery, and a variety of other articles
which have been dropped in by chance, or thrown in iriten-
tionally, and they have hence been very properly termed
rubbish holes. The earth taken from the bottom of those at
Richborough, on being examined by an experienced chemist,
was pronounced to be the remains of stercoraceous matter.
These pits are formed so carefully, and are some of them so small
in diameter, and at the same time so deep, that we might
almost suppose that they had been made with a large cheese-
scoop. Perhaps they were originally covered with some light
structure. Some antiquaries, from finding broken urns in
them, have imagined that these pits were sepulchral, but they
have probably been misled by erroneous impressions of acci-
dental circumstances connected with them.*
There is one other question of great interest and importance
connected with the towns of Roman Britain, — the origin and
formation of our lan"uao-e.
It is remarkable how generally in the earlier ages of peoples,
fable usurps the place of history. iVnd even long after the
memory of the past has assumed a form wdiich we look upon as
history, it still continues to be little more than legend and
romance. It is one of the great results of the deeper and more
comprehensive studies of the present day, to dispel by degrees
the dark clouds of error thus formed, and drag from behind
them the truth which has been so long hidden.
* See a paper in the ' Arcbaeologia,' vol. xxxii., on such pit.'?, found at
Ewell, by Dr Diamond, and another, in vol. xxxiv., on a similar pit found
at Stone, Bucks, by Mr Akerman. In the latter it is stated, erroneously,
that sepulchral deposits were found in the wells at Richborough ; they
were carefully examined by good antiquaries as they were cut away by
the railway excavators, and most certainly there was nothinc: sepulchral
about them ; they hud literally been receptacles of filth and refuse.
7^
-f
216 THE ROMANS. [chap. vi.
Tliere is, perhaps, no part of history which has been moi-e
obscured by the causes aUuded to tlian that of the Eomau and
post-Eomau period of our island, and yet it is one in wliich we
must all feel the greatest interest. Our old histories represent
the Romans as finding the isle of Britain occupied by an ab-
orig-inal population of Celtic races, formed into tribes under a
number of great chieftains, whom with much trouble they re-
duced to subjection, in which subjection they remained dui-ing
the Roman period, and then, when the Romans departed from
the island, they recovered their old position of British chief-
tains, and retained it, till they fell before the Saxon invaders.
Various researches and discoveries, but especially a more com-
prehensive study of the written records of history, and a more
extensive examination of the remaining monuments of the Ro-
man age of our island, have shown us that most of our common
notions of our condition during that period are very erroneous, s/
I will endeavour to put this in a more correct light.
The Romans appear to have had an especial regard for the
Western provinces of the Empire, and the natural consequence
was that those provinces soon became far more entirely Roman-
ised than the provinces of the East. This, indeed, was more
easy in the one case than in the other ; for the Eastern Empire
was fouiuled upon bygone civilisations which far exceeded that
of Rome itself, whereas the population of the Western Empire
consisted chiefly of only half-civilised tribes, which hai'dly had
one common system of action, and which, therefore, were more
easily acted upon. The province of Gaul was especially Roman,
both politically, and in the extent of its Roman civilisation.
This province of Graul had already been completely formed
under the rule of the emperor Augustus. It was then, as we
have just seen, covered with towns and cities connected with
each other by admirable roads. The cities were, in every re-
spect, Roman cities, tilled with noble buildings, and other ob-
jects, displaying the perfection of Roman art. The population
was dressed in the Roman costume, and their manners were
entirely Roman. The only language talked through the pro-
vince, with the exception of two remote districts the conditions
of wdiich are explained by other causes, was Latin. This was
the case in all the Roman provinces of the West, and was in-
sisted upon, at all events in theory, in the East also. The
emperor Claudius, who was himself a native of Lugdunum
(Lyons), the capital of Gaul, is said to have been especnally
tirm in insisting upon the use of the Latin language. We are
+
s/
CHAP. VI.] THE LATIN LANGUAGE IX BRITAIN. 217
informed by the historian Dio Cassiiis, t1iat a Koman citizen
from Lycia, having been sent by his province on a deputation
to the emperor, and not being- able to reply to his questions
in Latin, was immediately deprived of his rights of citizenship.
' No man,' said Claudius, ' can be a citizen of Eome who is
ignorant of the language of Rome ! ' Claudius is understood _,
to have introduced the common use of the Latin language into /
Ih'itain.
Not only did the Latin language become that of the towns
in the provinces, and no doubt that of the people also, but art
and literature sprang up and to some degree tiourished among
them. One or two well-known Latin writers of tlie later Eo-
man period came from the provinces. I need hardly say that
the almost classic poet Ausonius was a native of BurdigahiY/
{Bordaaux). And, in fact, all the writing we can trace in
(ji-aul during the Roman or post-Roman period, was undoubt-
edly in the Latin tongue. It continued, indeed, long after the
overthrow of the Roman empire in the West to be the ver-
nacular language of the people of Gaul, and it was by the
Gauls themselves called Roman — in fact, they then considered
themselves Romans — and so firmly was it identified with them,
that even the conquests of the Franks, whose language of
course was Teutonic, not unlike our Anglo-Saxon, did nothing y
towards unseating it. We have a curious record of this con-
dition of the Latin language in Gaul so late as the middle of
the 9th century; when, at a great meeting at Strasbourg, in
the March of the year 842, Charles le Cliauve, king of France,
and his brother Louis, the king of Germany, made mutually a
solemn oath for their two peoples, Louis made liis oath in Gei*-
man, while Charles made his in Latin, or, as they call it,
Roviana lingua, and Charles's Roman is still pure Latin in y
words, though it has undergone a certain amount of degrada-
tion in form. After tlie 11th century, this language, still
under the name of Romaue, begins to come out largely in
literature; it still preserves the remains of Latinity in form.
This, in the abundance of literary monuments of the ages which
follow, goes on softening down, until the memory of Romanism
itself is lost, and then it is called French.
Thus was formed gradually the French language of the pre-
sent day from the Roman or Latin language as talked in Gaul.
There is mixed with it, in its modern form, a German element,
derived from the Franks, but no Gallic (Celtic) element that I
am aware of. In this same manner have been formed the
i^
^
/
2i8 THE I10MA>^S. [chap, vi,
modern jangiinji'es of all the Roman provinces of the Western
Empire, and they all betray their origin. The Latin, or Koman,
languag-e as talked in the Sonthern Peninsula produced the
Italian, that of Aquitaiiia pi-oduced the rroven9al, and that of
Hispania the Spanish. All these languages were known in the
n.i(klle ages to those who spoke them by the name of Romcuie
tongues. It is a name which plays an interesting paiTln" the
mediaeval literary history of Western Enro]:)e. There is onlv
one exception to what I have just been describing, and that is
I found in the instance of the province of Britain. It is a vei'V
interesting and important question, which is worthy of our con-
sideration.
•When the Eomans came to Britain, they found the island
occupied by a number of independent tribes, under different
chieftains, the greater part of which appear to have been of
Celtic race, talking a Celtic tongue, but to judge from the
accounts they have left, there Avere some tribes of a ditferent
origin. Such, for instance, were the Belgae, who no doubt had
passed over from Gaul, and spoke the language of the Belgai
there. To the latter they applied the term JFcelisc or Wcehc.
I In the German of the middle ages, the Erench language
was always spoken of as W(bIscJi, and it is the name used
to signify Italian in the German of the present day. In
fact fKe~princIpal foreigners to them were the provincials
of the Eoman provinces, whom they always found speaking-
Latin. So, Avhen our Anglo-Saxon forefathers came to
I^ritain, they called the Roman population they found here
TFahc, or Welsh, no doubt on account of the language
they spoke. Thus all circumstances combine to show that
Latm was the language spoken in the Roman pi-ovince of
Britain. I have a strong suspicion, from difterent cir-
cumstances I have remarked, that the towns in our island
continued, in contradistinction frorii tlie country, to use the
Latin tongue long after the empire of Rome had disappeared,
and after the country had become Saxon, and they settled in
our south-Avestern counties, Hampshire, Wiltshire, and Somer-
setshire. The Belgae, no doubt, talked Latin, and it Avas
equally the language of their colonists in Britain ; and there,
as in other parts of the island, Latin Avas no donbt the language
•*y^ talked in the Roman provinces and towns. We have evidence
' of this in the fact that in exploring the Roman remains here,
whether in town or country, Avhen we meet with inscriptions,
they are invariably expressed in Latin. Even in Wales, Avheie
I
CHAP. VI.] THE LANGUAGE. 219
Iloman inscriptions are tolerably abundant, I have never heard
of one which was Romano-Celtic. And, in fact, the existence
of anything; of tliis kind is so rare, that I think we may con-
sider it doubtful if we have now any authentic sample left of
the lanp;uage which the Eritons talked when the Romans came
to our ishmd. It was no doubt a Celtic dialect, but it seems
to be only preserved to us in the formation of the names of
places which are older than the Anglo-Saxon, chiefly of moun-
tains and rivers, and we are rather led to believe that it closely
resembled the languages of Ireland and Scotland. I confess
that I am much inclined myself to the opinion that the Welsh
language has a diiferent origin, which may perhaps be accounted
for as follows : It seems to be commonly acknowledged, that
the Welsh is the same dialect of Celtic as the Breton tongue of
Armorica, and several stories are told in connection with the
Peninsular War of the earlier part of the present century, of the
ease with Avhich the AVelsh soldiers in our army understood
and conversed with the Bretons our allies. There can be little
doubt that, during the period at which the Saxon settlement
of our island took place, the Bretons of France were great ad-
venturers on the sea. At a very early period, but rather later
than this, they were the principal visitors to Newfoundland ;
and I think it more than probable that in the time of which
we are speaking they sent expeditions to the coasts of Britain
in the same manner as the Angles and Saxons, and as it was
in a manner the part of the island which looked to them, just
as the others regarded at this time the various peoples of the
northern race. Thus the Bretons formed their establishment
in Cornwall and Wales, and the Welshmen, to whom the Anglo-
Saxons gave a name which signified strangers, and the Cornish,
who speak the same dialect, began soon to considei' themselves
as the original inhabitants of Britain, and have been so con-
sidered ever since. This belief was strengthened by the circum-
stance that the settlers had brought with them from Brittany
their national legends, which seem to have formed the mass of
the early British poetry in Geoffrey of Monmouth and that clasps
of writers. Thus I myself feel very strongly the belief that
the Welshmen of the present day are not the descendants of
the ancient inhabitants of our island, but a later Celtic colony ^
, from Armorica, and this explains how they became so familiar
'^ wi*h the Bretons of the maritime districts of the north-west of
I France.
On a fair consideration of all these facts, I am led to the
1/
220
THE ROMANS.
[chat
VT.
+
belief that tlie lano;ua2:e spoken throug-liout the isles of Britain
was Latin, and that if the Angles and Saxons had never come,
•\ve should have been now a people talking a Neo-Latin tongne,
closely resembling French. The Irish or Gaelic has perhaps
the best claim to be considered as representing the lanjniai'je o\
the Ancient Britons. ^
V
H
if'"
>
/-^
^
Ir'^
A
CHAP. vri.l EOMAN ROADS. 22 i
CHAPTEU VIT.
The Country — Roman Ro.ads, and their Construction — Milliaria: the
Roman Mile — Bridges — Roman Villas; Woodchester, Bignor, &c. —
Tesselated pavements, and the Subjects represented on them — Rustic
Villag:es — Agriculture and Farming — Country Life; the Chase —
British Dogs.
With the imperfect view which we. have thus been able to
obtain of a Eoman town in Britain, we see enough of comfort
and elegance to convince us that the island was then in-
habited by a population which had reached a high degree of
civilisation and refinement. Of this we shall find still more re-
markable traces when we leave the town and proceed into the
country. The first objects that would there attract attention
were the roads, which were constructed with such ex:lraordinarv
skill that even now many of the best roads in England are laid
upon the ancient Eomau foundation.
Vitruvius has given exact directions for making a road.
Tliey began, it appears, by making two parallel furrows., the
intended width of the road, and tlieu removed all the loose
earth between them till they came to the hard solid ground,
and they filled up this excavation with fine earth hard beaten
in. This first layer was called the pavlmentiim. Upon it was
laid the first bed of the road, consisting of small squared stones,
nicely ranged on the ground, which was sometimes left dry,
but often a large quantity of fresh mortar was poured into it.
This layer was termed datiimeii. The next was called rudus or
ruderatio, and consisted of a mass of small stones, broken to
pieces and mixed with lime, in tlie proportion of one part of
broken stones to two of lime. The third layer, or bed, which
was termed nucleus, was formed of a mixture of lime, chalk,
pounded or broken tiles, or earth, beaten together, or of gravel
or sand and lime mixed with clay. Upon this was laid the
surface or pavement of the road, which was called technically
summum dorsum, or summa crusta. It was composed some-
222 THE ROMANS. [chap. vit.
times of stones set like the paving stones in our streets, and
sometimes of flag-stones cut square or polyg-onally, and also,
probably oftener, of a firm bed of gravel and lime, Tht loads
were thus raised higher tlian the surrounding grounds, .iiid on
this account the mass was termed cKjger.
The residt of the above process would be a Eoman road of
tlie most perfect description ; but we must not suppose that in
any part of the empire tliese directions Avere always strictly ad-
hered to. On the contrary, there arc \t\\ Roman roads exist-
ing which do not in some way or otiier vary from them ; some
^ are entirely without the nucleus, in otliers there was no
\| datumsu.. Nevertheless, there is always found a sufficiently
close resemblance between the structure of the old Roman
roads as they exist, and the directions given above. They are
often found in 'our island in an extraordinary degree of per-
fection ; where they have been used to the present time as high-
I'oads, they are naturally worn down, and it is only at rare in-
tervals that we can find any characteristic to identify them,
except it be the extraordinary straightness of the course; but
where the course of the road has been changed at a subsequent
period, and especially where it runs along an uncultivated
heath, the ancient Roman road often presents itself to our view
in an imposing embankment for several miles together. When
they came upon higher ground, the Romans were not in the
habit of entrenching, but they often raised the embankment
higher even than in the plain, probably as a measure of pre-
caution. Thus, on the summit of the Gogmagog hills, near
Cambridge, the embankment of the Roman road is very lofty
and remarkably perfect. They seem seldom to have turned out
r»f their course to avoid a hill, and, in some instances, we find
tiie Roman ]'oad proceeding direct up an acclivity which we
should not encounter at the present day. A Roman road runs
over the top of one of the mountains of Westmoreland, almost
two thousand feet above the level of the sea, which is named
from it, High Street.
The roads here described are of course to be looked upon as
the grand military roads of the empire, those along which the
lines of the Itineraries are traced, and Avhich formed the direct
communication between the towns in this island which have
been enumerated in a former chapter. But there were numer-
ous other roads in all parts of the island, such as the Romans
termed vice viciuales, branch roads, private, private roads,
agrarice, country roads, device, by-roads. These were con-
CHAP. VII.] ROMAX ROADS. 223
strncted with mncli less labour than tlie others, yet they were
still sufficiently ii,-ood and durable to have left distinct traces
down to the present time. They were sometimes paved with
Hau'-stones, as is the case with one over the hills near Mon-
mouth, where the stones are fitted tog'ether with care, thouo-h
tliey are of all shapes and sizes. This, as it has been already
observed, was probably a common way of pavino; the streets of
towns. The Roman road leadino^ direct from Lymne to Can-
terbury, seems, by old accounts, to have been paved in this
manner, and it is still, no doubt from that circumstance, called
Stone Street. The stones themselves, in the course of ag-es,
have been carried away for various purposes of utility. Other
larg-er roads, which seem to have traversed nearly the whole
island, and which were not constructed in tlie same laborious
manner as the military roads, Avere probably intended for com-
mercial purposes, such as those which branch from the salt (lis- .
tricts of Droitwich, and from the mining districts. Antiquaries "V
seem often to have been so misled by their dissimilitude to
the great Roman military roads, as to imagine many of these
to have been British. It is not very probable that the older
inhabitants of the island, such as CiBsar found them, divided
into separate and hostile tribes, which seem often to have
changed their boundaries, as they were pressed forwards by
other colonies, should liave been great road-makers.
We know that the Roman roads were constructed and regu-
lated at an enormous expense, and we learn, from ancient
writers, that the office of curator vlarum was one which implied
considerable honour. Nearer the centre of the empire, if not
in the distant provinces, there were from place to place muta-
t'iones, or places where post-horses might be taken, which were
termed agm'maleH, and which were conducted by vereda?'ii, or pos-
tilions. The keepers of these stations were called statores. It
was by m^eaus of these posts that Constantine, the son of Con-
stantius Chlorus, made his rapid and celebrated progress from
the east to join his father in Britain, and as they appear to have
been continued to the coast of Gaul, it is probable that they
were also established in this island. There were also found by
the road-side dlversor'ia, caupona, or tahernm dlversorice, places
of entertainment for man and horse, which were kept by diver-
sores and caupoiies. Further, at stated intervals, stood iiiait-
siones, the keepers of which, named manclpes, stopped the pas-
sengers to examine their diploDiata, or passports.
Through all the immense systems of great roads which thus
224 THE ROMANS. [chap. vii.
run over the whole Koinan empire, tlie distances were marked
out with the <>'i'eatest care, and at the end of eacli miUe pansKS,
or Roman mile, was erected a milliary cohmm or milestone,
{iiilUiarmni), with an inscription, indicating the distance from
the next town. These milestones usually consisted of a lari>e
plain cylinder of stone, raised on a l)ase ; and the insciiptiou
stated tlie name of the emperor under whose reig-n it was
erected, so that they were probably often changed, in order to
honour a new emperor's name. After the Romans had departed
from the island, these monuments were gradually taken for th^r;
material, and only a few of them have been preserved, which is
to be lamented, as they would have thrown great light on the
lionian topography of Britain. The only perfect example known
at present in this country is one preserved in the local museum
at Leicester, and its inscription, which is as follows, states that
it was set up under the emperor Hadrian, at the distance of two
juiles from llatse.
IMP CAESAR
DIV TRAIAN PARTH F DIV
TRAIAN HADRIAN AVG
PONT IV COS III A RATIS
II.
It is a perfect cylinder, three feet six inches in height, and five
feet seven inches in circumference, and was dug np, in 1771,
by the side of the ancient Roman road, called the Foss-Avay,
about two miles to the north of Leicester, thus identifying the
Roman name of tliat town. There is another with an inscrip-
tion nearly perfect, at Caton, near Lancaster, also erected under
Hadrian. These milestones have been found more numerously
in Gaul, and one of them, discovered near the town of Vic-sur-
Aisne, lias the following inscription, stating that it was raised
in the fourteenth year of the reign of Caracalla, or a.d. 212, at
the distance of seven leagues from Soissons.
IMP CAES
M AVRELIO AN
TON IN O PIO
AVG BRIT ANN I
CO MAX TRIE
POT XIIII IMP II
COS III PPPRO
COS AB AVG
SVESS LEVa
VII.
CHAP. VII.] EOMAN ROADS. 225
It will be seen by tliis last inscription, that in ancient Gaul,
as in modern France, they reckoned by leagues, and not, as in
Britain, by miles. If we had but two consecutive milliaria
remaining in their places, we should be able at once to solve
the much-debated question of the length of the Eoman mdes
in Britain ; but, unfortunately, no such discovery has yet been
made. We know that the mile consisted of a thousand passns,
QY paces, which, accorduig to D'Anville, was equivalent to 756
French toises, or 4S3'1"28 English feet. The English mile is
5380 feet. We gain, however, not much in knowing the exact
measure of the Roman mile, because we cannot place trust in
the numbers given in the Itineraries. The Eoman numerals
were easily altered by careless copyists, and they are found to
be so often wrong in the texts of the Itineraries as they now
exist, that we can place no confidence in them, at all events as
far as regards Britain, and the only safe method of applying
them to the actual sites is first to find the traces of the stations,
and then compare them with the Itinerary.
One of the most remarkable characteristics of the Eoman
roads is the extraordinary straightness of their course. The
great military roads may often be traced for many miles without
a single deviation from the direct line. When there is a
deviation, if between two stations, it Avas for some very import-
r.nt reason, and may generally be explained by the circumstances
o'i the locality. As avc have before remarked, hills, even when
of considerable elevation, presented no obstacle to the course of
the road. The Eoman engineers even drained or filled iq)
marshes, when they stood in their way, if there were any
advantage to be gained by passing across them. We have
many proofs that the rivers in this country were passed by an
extensive system of bridges — it is probable, indeed, that a mili-
tary road seldom passed a river without one. Some of tlieV
more important Eoman bridges remained till a recent period,
forming the foundation of the modern structures which replaced
tliem. Such was tlie case little more than twenty years ago at
London, and when the old bridge over the Tyne at Newcastle
was taken down in 1771, the piers were found to be Eoman
masonry. The foundation Avas laid upon piles of fine black oak,
Avhich were in a state of perfect preser\'ation. The remains of
three bridges are found along the line of the Wall. When the
old Teign-bridge in Devonshire, by which the Eoman road
crossed the Teign in its way to Totness and Plymouth, was
taken down in 1815, the Eoman work beneath was found in a
~f
2Z6 THE ROMANS. [chap. vii.
remarkable state of preservation. It is the opinion of Mr Bruee
and of other antiqnaries tliat the hridg-e at Newcastle, as well as
the otliers in the Wall district, had no arches, but that a liori-
zontal roadway of timber was laid on the piers. ' The founda-
tions of the piers of three Roman bridges in the region of the
AVall,' Mr Bruce tells us, 'still remain; one across the Tyne
at Corstopitum, one across the North Tyne at Cilurnum, and
another across the Rede-water at Habitancum ; an examination
of these has induced me to believe that they, at least, had no
arches. The piers are of a size and strength sufficient to with-
stand the thrust of the waters without the aid of an arch ; and
in one at least of these cases, the requisite spring of the arch
would have raised the road to an inconvenient height. An ex-
perienced mason, who examined carefully the ruins of the bridge
at Habitancum, told me that he observed that all the stones
which encumbered the spot were square, none of them having
the shape of stones used in building arches. It is certain that
in the mediaeval period the Newcastle bridge had a road of
timber.' We cannot doubt, nevertheless, that many Roman
bridges had arches. Mr Roach Smith has pointed out a very
tine semicircular arched bridge over the little river Cock,
near its entrance into the Wharfe, about half-a-mile below
Tadcaster, on the Roman road leading southward from that
town (the ancient Calcaria), which he considered as Roman.
The masonry of this bridge is massive, and remarkably well
preserved, and the stones are carefully squared and shai'ply cut,
and on some of them the mason's mark, an R, is distinctly
visible. The roadway was very narrow. The Saxons seem to
have preserved carefully the bridges they found in existence,
though they probably built few themselves ; and I am inclined
to believe that most of the bridges in this country at the time
of the Norman conquest w^ere Roman. The preservation of
these ancient bridges was considered of so much importance,
that the charge of them was often thrown upon the hundred,
or on the county. Thus, at Cambridge, the county was bound
to see that the bridge was kept in repair, and certain lands were
allotted for the expense of the repairs ; and I have very little
doubt that the bridge Avhich in the thirteenth century was in
such a ruinous condition, that people's carts used to fall over
into the river, was the ancient bridge of the Roman town of
Caraboricum.* It was probably from a broken Roman bridge,
* Dicunt quod reparatio et refcotio magni pontis Cantebrigiae pertinent
ad couiitatuui Cantebrigise, et quidam de comitatu prsedicto tenent terras
CHAP. VII.] ROMAN VILLAS. 227
the remains of whicli seem to liave been visible in the time of
Leland, that the town of Pontefract, in Yorkshire {pons fracttis)
derived its name.
The objects, however, which must liave struck the traveller
most forcibly as he passed along the road between one town
and another, were the numerous country villas or mansions,
many of them magnificent palaces, covering as much ground as
a wliole town. Modern discoveries have shown us how mar-
vellously the country was covered, especially in some of tiie
southern and midland districts, with these great rural residences,
which will be better understood by the reader, if we describe
the relative positions of two or three known groups. Perhaps
the largest and most magnificent Roman villa yet discovered in
England is that at Woodchester, in Gloucestershire. Wood-
chester is situated in a beautiful valley in the high grounds
bordering on the vale of Gloucester, on the bank of a stream which
runs down thence into the plain to join the Severn, and at about
four miles from the Roman road from Corinium {Clrenceder') to
the trajectus Augicstl {Aiist Fassage) across the Channel. It
was about twelve miles from the town just mentioned, and the
same distance from Glevum {Gloucester). If we left Corinium
by the ancient road just mentioned, we should first have seen
on a hill to the right, between this road and the road to
Glevum, a villa of some extent, the remains of which have
been discovered at Daglingworth, about three miles to tlie
north-west of Cirencester. Close to the road on tlie left, under
a hill about five miles from Corinium, was a Roman station, or
building, at a place now called Trewsbury. About two miles
further, on the right-hand side of the road, stood another hand-
some villa, which has been excavated to some extent at Hoc-
berry, in the parish of Rodmarton. Two miles more brought
us to a villa on the opposite side of the road, and, like the last,
close to it, which has been discovered in the parish of Chering-
ton. About six miles further, on the same side of the road,
extensive buildings have been found at a place called Kingscot,
which belonged either to a villa or to a station. About half-
way between the two last places, a by-way probably ]e:l to tlie
g'cldabiles qui debent pontem reficere qiiando pons indiget reparatione et
refectione. Dicunt etiani quod pons praedictus debilis est, fractus, et dis-
solutus, ita quod carectae magnatuuni et alioruin ibidem transitum facientes
cadunt in aqua, ita quod taui homines quam equi emergunt ad majrnum
pevieulum et dampnum ibidem trausieutium. — Hundred Rolls vol. ii
p. 392.
228 THE ROMANS. [chap. vii.
villa at Woodchester, among' the liills to the right. Eight or
nine miles from Kingscot, at a place called Croom-hall, remains
of another villa, or mansion, have been found, close to the left-
hand side of the road, where it passes over an eminence. A
few miles carried, the traveller hence to the shores of the Bristol
Channel. If we had taken the road from Corinium to Glevum,
we should first have seen the villa at Dagiingworth, on the hill
to the left, and then, on the right hand, and near the road,
about seven miles from Corinium, we should have seen a fine
villa which has been discovered at Combe-end. On the other
side of the road, in a fine valley among the hills, about half-way
between the road and Woodchester, was another rich villa, the
remains of which have been discovered at a place called Brown's
Hill. In the vale of Gloucester, at the foot of the hills, about
four miles to the west of Woodchester, stood another handsome
villa, or perhaps a small town, at Procester. All these places
are within a very small circuit, and have been discovered
accidentally, so that there may be others within the same
compass.
Let us now turn to Somersetshire, and take as a centre the
ancient town of Somerton, situated on a Eoman road leading
from Ilchester in the direction of Glastonbury. If we follow
this road towards Ilchester, two miles from Somerton, two ex-
tensive Roman villas have been traced in the parish of Kings-
don, one near the Roman road, the other a little to the east, on
the bank of a small stream called the Cary. Further east, on
the other side of the stream, a third villa has been found at
Lytes Cary. These three villas are included in a distance of
about a mile. In the parish of Hurcot, joining Somerton to the
east, two villas have also been found, one near Somerton, the
other about three-quarters of a mile to the north-east. Barely
half a mile to the south-east of the latter is another extensive
Roman villa at Charlton Mackrel ; and in the opposite direction,
somewhat more than half a mile from the Hurcot villa, is an-
other at Copley. To the east of this, in the parish of Littleton,
close to the Roman road just mentioned, a group of several Roman
villas has been found. Proceeding along the road northwardly,
at about four miles from Somerton, we arrive at Butleigh
Bottom, where a Roman villa of considerable extent has been
traced. Villas are found in equal abundance within two or
three miles to the west of Somerton, among which the most
extensive is that at Pitney, covering an acre and a half of
ground, and containing a very remarkable pavement. It may
CHAP. VII.] ROMAN VlLl.AS. 229
be remarked that tlie walls of the villas in this district abound
in herring'-bone work. We might give similar examples of the
profusion with which the Eoman villas were scattered over
the country in Hampshire and Oxfordshire. In the latter
county, two uoble villas stood within a mile of each other,
in the parishes of Stouesfield and North Leigh, near the
Roman road now called the Akeman Street. The splendid
Roman villa at Bignor, in Sussex, at the foot of tlie hills to the
north of Arundel, close by the Roman road from Rcgnum
{Chichester) (o London, has a situation something like that of
Woodchester. Over the hills, between two and three miles to the
north-west of Bignor, a villa has been traced near the church
at Duncton. To the north-east, by the side of the Roman
road to London, at about two miles distant from Bignor, traces
of Roman occupation are found, and about three miles further,
in the parish of Pulborough, there has been a Roman station.
Rather more than six miles to the south of Bignor, the
discovery of a Roman sepulchre at Avisford seems to indi-
cate the vicinity of another villa ; about six miles eastwardly
from this place a villa has been found in the parish of Ang-
niering : and another villa has been found on the coast of Bog-
nor, about seven miles to the southward of Avisford.*
While we are thus speaking in general terms of villas scat-
tered over the country so thickly, few will imagine what an im-
mense pile of building a Roman villa usually was. I will,
therefore, proceed to describe one of the largest in this country,
that of Woodchester, which was opened partly under the
superintendence of Mr Lysons during the years from 1793
to 1796. Nothing could be finer than the site which the
Roman proprietor had here chosen for his residence. A
square level platform, Avith a little narrow gorge on the north,
down which a small stream ran into the larger stream that
washed the foot of its eastern declivity, was backed by a
hill Avhich sheltered it from the damp -winds of the west.
* The "villas of "Woodchester and Bignor formed the subject of very
splendid publications by Lysons. An account of the Pitney villa and
pavement was published by Sir Richard Colt Hoare, in a thin 8vo volume,
printed in 1832. A description of the North Leigh and Stonesiield villas
was printed in 1836, by Mr Henry Hakewill, in a similar form. The
great collection by Lysons contains, in addition to Woodchester and
llignoi-, accounts of villas at Littlecote in AViltshire, Frampton in Dorset,
Witliington in Gloucestershire, Horkstow in Lincolnshire, and some
others, all illustrated with magnificent plates of pavements, &c. Accounts
ui other villas will be found in the various volumes of the Archseologia of
the Society of Antiquaries.
2?>0
THE ROMANS.
[ofiAi. vn
It was also sheltered from the east winds by a hill which
rose on the opposite side of the stream. Tlie main valley
Plan of tlie Roman. Villa at "Woodchester.
ran north and west, and, curiously enough, what
appear to have been the principal apartments, lay
with a north-westerly aspect. The arrang-ement of
this extensive building* will be the best understood
by the accompanying plan.^ The apartment marked
1, was a room nearly fifty feet square. It lay under
the churchyard at Woodchester, and the sextons, in
digging graves, had at various periods, during more than
two centuries, brought to liglit and destroyed portions of its
splendid pavement. This consisted of a central circular com-
* Tho rooms in wliich mosaic pavements were found, are shaded in
iLe n.un.
CHAP. VII.] VILLA AT WOODCIIESTER. i>31
partment of about twenty-five feet in diameter, consisting; of
an outer border formed of a Yitruvian scroll, edgtjd on each
side by a g-uiHoche, and enriched with foliag'e proceedins;
from a mask of Pan, having; a beard of leaves. Immediately
within this border was a wide circular band containing- repre-
sentations of twelve different animals, on a white g-round, with
trees and flowers between them. Within this circle was a
smaller band, sepai'ated from it by a guilloche and a border of
acorns, and containing- representations of birds on a Avhile
ii'round. Amony; them was a fi2;ure of a fox. On the southei'u
side was a fig-ure of Orpheus playing on the lyre. This band
was bounded internally by a twisted guilloche, and within was
a central hexagon about ten feet in diameter. This centre had
been entirely destroyed long before the time of the opening of
the villa by Lysons, but some old drawings, made on former
partial openings, show that tlie field was covered with figures
of fish and sea monsters. I am inclined to think that it was
a little lower than the rest of the pavement, and formed the
floor of a shallow reservoir ibr water. Tlie circular compart-
ment I have been describing was inclosed in a square IVame,
consisting of twenty-four compartments, enriched with a great
variety of guilloches, scrolls, frets, and other ornaments, edged
on the inside with a braided guilloche, on the outside with a
labyrinth fret, between a single fret and a braided guilloche. In
the four angular spaces between the great border of this "^ov-
geous pavement and the great circular compartment were the
remains of female figures, two of which appear to have occupied
each space ; they had evidently been naiads. At the fonr
inner corners of the s(juare were found sufficient indications that
they had once been occupied by columns, which had no doubt
supported the roof, which was probably vaulted. It was found
that the pavement was supported by a hypocaust, or system of
flues, intended to warm the room.
On each side of this large apartment was found a passage,
twenty-nine feet four inches long by seven feet and a half wide,
the entrance into which was by a door tliree feet wide. The
floor of these passages was paved with coarse mosaic work, orna-
mented with a double labyrinth fret of a dark bluish-grey on
a white ground, surrounded by a plain red stripe. Curiously
enough, at the extremity of the eastern of these passages, part
of another pavement was discovered laid over it, a foot above its
level, formed of much coarser materials than the original
one, and very ill executed ; the design being merely stripes of
232 THE ROMANS. [chap. vh.
white, blue, and red, very irregularly put together. It had evi-
dently been an alteration made at a late period.
To the southward of these two passages, were, on each side
of the great apartment, two rooms, of which that nearest to the
great apartment on eacli side had a mosaic pavement, of the
same degree of coarseness as the passnges, but of a simple and
elegant design, consisting of a mat of tliree colours, dark grey,
red, and white, surrouuded by a double red border.
These were the first discoveries made, aud they led to a more
extensive investigation. On the south of the great apartment
a gallery was discovered, a hundred and fourteen feet in lengtli,
by ten iu width, except where it passed the wall of the great
pavement, where it was only nine feet wide. The mosaic was
of the same degree of coarseness as that of the other passages,
but it was ornamented with a great variety of patterns, con-
sisting cliietly of labyrinths, mats, and stars, for the most part
in a good taste, forming square compartments, with a single
twisted guilloche and two plain red stripes running round the
whole of tlieni. Those parts of the wall of this gallery whidi
remained on the south side were two feet thick, and beyond it
towards the south was a hard terrace floor. As the pavement
of the gallery was destroyed at the centre, and no foundations
of the wall remained there, it was impossible to ascertain if
there had been any entrance from this gallery immediately into
the room of the great pavement.
Excavations were now commenced at the end of the southern
gallery running from the large apartment, and the room to the
north of that marked No. 2 was found. This apartment, which
had been a square of twenty-two feet ten inches, appeared also
to have been new floored, for on excavating to the depth of
three feet, the workmen came to a floor of very hard cement or
terrace, on removing some of which a small fragment of mosaic
pavement was discovered, six inches below the level of that
floor. The whole of the terrace floor was then removed, .not
without much difficulty, on account of the extreme hardness ot
the cement. Under it were found four fragments of a mosaic
pavement, which had been partly broken up. They were in a
very good style, and the design had consisted of five octagonal
compartments, containing figures on a white ground, surround-
ed by a double labyrinth fret ; immediately within which, on
the north side, was a scroll of flowers, with a vase in the centre.
In the remains of the compartments, at the north-west and
south-east corners, Avere fragments of Bacchanalian figures.
CHAP. vTi.] VILLA AT WOODCHESTER. 233
The octagon il compartment at tlie south-west comer was entire,
and contained figures of two boys holding- up a l)asket of fruit
and leaves, with the inscription bonvm eventvm under tliem,
in large capital letters. The compartment at the north-east
corner had been nearly destroyed, but the letters biinii c . . .
remained, evidently for bhnh colite, the Greek H being used
for the Latin E, of which there are other examples. The
inscription, when entire, would thus be, Bouum Eve)dum beue
colite, a recommendation to worship well Bonus Eventus, one
of the twelve deities who presided over the aftairs of husbandry.*
The walls of this room were two feet thick, formed of stone,
roughly hewn, and remained to the height of about three feet
on every side. Fragments of stucco, painted in fresco, lay
scattered about. On the west side the wall was double, witli
a space of six. inches between, to secure the room against
humidity. Another system of flues for warming was found
under this room, the passages being about four feet deep.
The room adjoining. No. 2, had no tesselated pavement, but
the same hypocaust of flues extended under it, and outside the
wall was the fire-place communicating with them. The apei'ture
under the wall, where the fire seemed to have been placed, Avas
formed by bricks, one foot five inches long, one foot wide, and
two inches thick ; it was one foot eleven inches wide at the
bottom, and six inches at the top, where a sort of arch was
formed by the edges of the bricks gradually advancing beyond
each other. This fire-place had walls one foot eight inches
thick on each side ; they were four feet two inches apart, and
projected outwards four feet from the wall. A considerable
quantity of skulls and bones of animals, chiefly sheep, were
found near the fire-place.
To the south of the room marked 2, was another apartment,
twenty feet long, by twelve feet eight inches wide, which con-
tained a mosaic pavement, of a tasteful design. It consisted
of a circular compartment, between two oblong ones, united
together by a single twisted guilloche, with a border formed by
a labyrinth fret, between which and the wall was a considerable
space filled up with plain red tesserae, rather more than an inch
* So we are informed by Varro, de Re Rustica, lib. i. There was a
temple of Bonus Eventus at Rome, and Pliny mentions statues of this
deity, which represented him holding a patera in the right hand, and an
ear of corn and a poppy in the left. He is represented in the same shape
on the reverse of a coin of Titus ; and the reverse of one of Geta has a
ff^male tigure holding a dish of fruits in her right hand, and ears of corn
ic iier left, with the inscription liONi eventvs.
£34 THE ROMANS. [chap. vir.
square. The circular coinpartinent was Tiearly (iesivoved, "but
it had probably contained a fi<>ure. This floor was also sup-
ported by a hypocaust, and it had a fire-place outside the wall,
near which was found a coin of Magnentius.
Two rooms were subsequently opened, between the room
No. 2, and the large room No. 1, and the one adjoining to the
latter had a tesselated pavement, consisting of two square com-
partments, filled Avith labyrinths, and united together by a
braided guilloche, on the outside of which were tAVO narrow red
stripes. The parts of the building next explored Avere the
large rooms, numbered 9 and 10, and the room to the left of
the latter. One of them AA^as thirty-eight feet square; another
Avas thirty-eight feet by forty- six ; and the third Avas thirty-
eight feet by fifty-one. The Avails remained in several places,
to the height of four feet from the foundation. Those on the
north side were two feet tAvo inches thick, and Avere in some
places lined with brickwork ; the south walls w(?re one foot t(;n
inches thick. These Avails Avere in several places plastered on
the outside, and painted of a dull red colour. Many frag-
ments of the stucco which had covered the walls internally,
and had been painted in fresco, Avitli various colours, Avere
found among the rubbish. Some of them were painted Avith
large ca])ital letters, Avhich had formed parts of inscriptions.
These rooms appeared to have had tesselated pavements, Avhich
had been broken up ; and several slices of marble of different
sorts, but chiefly foreign, Avere also found. These had, per-
haps, been employed to encrust the Avails, a practice Avhich Ave
know prevailed among the Konians. Some of these pieces of
marble Avere not more than a quarter of an inch thick. Parts
of tAVo stone columns, and fragments of statuary, Avere subse-
quently found in the room No. 10, and in the room adjoining
it to the left ; on digging trenches across, several inner walls,
two feet four inches Avide, Avere discovered running in the
directions indicated by the light outlines in our plan. These
walls were covered Avith large flat stones on the top, which did
not rise higher than the foundations of the other Avails, so that
it is probable that they supported a floor, and that their object
Avas to prevent humidity in the apartment above. Among the
ruins of this room Avere found quantities of tesserse, many frag-
ments of the figured Samian Avare, and of glass vessels, and
portions of two statues in Samian marble, Avhich seemed to
have belonged to figures of Diana Lucifera and Meleager. At
the east end of the room, No. 9, great part of an arch was
CHAP. VII.] VILLA AT WOODCIIESTER. 23-5
discovered, about three feet below the surface of the earth,
which was doubtless connected with the substructure of the
floors.
From the autumn of 1795 to the summer of 1796, the
excavations were carried on more to the south, and the g'reat
coiu't, B, was traced, with the various apartments round it.
On the west side was a mass of building-s, containing twelve
rooms, which had been entered from the court by a vestibule,
l)et\ve3n the rooms marked 18 and 19. In this vestibule a
iVagment of a beautiful group, in Avhite marble, of Cupid and
Psyclie, was found, which had evidently been copied from the
same model as a well-known group of sculpture in the
Museum Florentinum. The walls in this part of tlie building
were of stone, with bonding courses of brick ; and among the
ruins were found thin slabs of stone, of an irregnhxr hexagonal
form, whicli, no doubt, belonged to the roof. Pieces of stags'
horns, several of them saAved off at the ends, were also found
here ; and several human bones were met with in the buildings
on the north and west sides of the great court. Many coins,
chiefly in small brass, were found here and in various parts of
the building.
A wall extended along the wliole length of the south side of
the great court, B, near the centre of which were discovered the
foundation walls of three rooms, or perhaps of a gateway, with
a door on each side (No. 21). Here, as in many other parts
of the building, the walls were destroyed down to the founda-
tion, so that it was impossible to ascertain the width of more
than one of the doorways, wliich was four feet wide. Frag-
ments of large columns were found here, which showed that
there had been an imposing display of architectural ornament.
A little to the west of these foundations, and attached to the
long southern Avail, Avere the remains of a singular building,
consisting of tAvo parallel Avails, three feet distant from each
other, connected by two transverse Avails, having an opening
between them. At the bottom of this opening there Avas a con-
siderable quantity of coal ashes, and, at the Avest end, at the
height of fifteen inches from the bottom, Avas a small tine through
the Avail. This building is described as presenting very much
the appearance of having held a boiler,
Considerable remains of buildings Avere also discovered on
the eastern side of this great court. A gallery first presented
itself, marked 24 in our plan, and measuring sixty-five feet
eight inches in length, by ten feet four inches wide.' The en-
236 THE ROMANS. [chap. vii.
trance from tlie court was eig-ht feet eip;lit inches wide. Another
opening in the east wall, immediately opposite and nearly of
the same dimensions, led into what appears to liave been a
court, c, surrounded with apartments. In one of these rooms,
to the east of the court, there were two pai'allel narrow walls
(tifteen inches wide), running the whole length of the room,
and square projections from the west wall. As these walls
rose no higher than the foundation part of the other walls, they
])robably suppoi-ted a pavement. At the north end of this
room was found the leg of a statue, of white marble, and not
far from it was a foundation of square stones, which appeared
to have been intended as a pedestal. The outward Avail on the
east side of this range of building was entire to the height
of from four to tive feet. It was three feet thick, and built of
stones roughly hewn, with six projections on the outside, which
were evidently buttresses. We may, therefore, suppose that
this was the exterior of the whole building on this side.
At the north end of the range of rooms of which we are
now speaking, at No. 22, were found the remains of what
Jjvsons considered to be a lacouictim, or sweating-room. At
the depth of five feet below the surface of the ground the ex-
cavators met with a very hard cement Hoor, eight feet ten
inches wide, and nine feet ten inches long. On removing this
Hoor, wdiich was eight inches thick, a layer of bricks was dis-
covered under it, which proved to be the covering of flues that
ran under the floor. The flues were two feet two inches in
depth, and one of them was longitudinal, and four transverse.
The longitudinal flue was one foot nine inches wide at the
bottom, and sev^en inches at the top. The transverse flues were
six inches wide at the top, and one foot six inches at the
bottom. They were built partly of unhewn stone, and partly
of brick, forming rude kind of arches. The intermediate
space between the transverse flues was filled up with ridge
tiles formed into funnels, and placed between layers of brick
and stone ; while the interstices, which were much wider than
is usual in walling, were filled with a reddish clay. The fun-
nels were -on an average eighteen inches long, and four and
a-half in diameter, some formed by only one of the curved
tiles. A row of perpendicular funnels extended along the
north and south walls, and seemed to have been carried up to
the top of the building. This elaborate hypocaust is shown,
as it appeared wdien opened, in our accompanying plate, whicli
is a view taken from the south-west corner, and exhibits a
Hypocaust in the Roman Villa at VYoodcliester.
1
CHAP. VII.] VILLA AT WOODCIIESTER. 239
frag'ment of tlie cement floor, as well as the floor of another
room on the east. The latter has no flues or hypocaust under-
neath, but at the north-east corner was a sort of basin hol-
lowed in the floor, from which a leaden pipe passed through
the wall. From the opposite corner of this room was a pas-
sage, with a floor of cement, rising towards the west, to more
than three feet above the level of the other part. The upper
part of it is destroyed, but at the south-east corner of the
great court is a passage, which appears to have been one of the
entrances to it.
From excavations made in diff^erent parts, it appeared that
the great court, b, had been laid with a coarse sort of terrace
pavement. Further excavations outside the southern wall of
the great court, brought to light a continuation of the western
wall, with an apartment in the corner, No. 27, and further on
a range of rooms, at 28. The excavations were next carried
on from the north-east corner of the great court, B, along the
eastern side of the court, A, which led to the discovery of a
ncAv series of apartments, Nos. 3 to 8, with traces of pave-
ments and hypocausts. These and the corresponding rooms
on the west side were carefully examined. In the room. No.
11, were found eight square stone pillars, two feet nine inches
and three-quarters high, which seemed to have been the sup-
ports of a hypocaust. On each side of the court was a gallery,
sixty-two feet five inches long, and eight feet five inches wide,
each of which had possessed handsome mosaic pavements, and
Avhich joined up to the great gallery on the north side of the
conrt. These galleries had had flues under them, and on the
outside of the walls of each, within the court, were short
parallel walls, that appeared to have been the fire-places to
hypocausts. In some of the rooms on the west side, remains
of very haiulsome mosaic pavements were discovered. The
floors on the east side of the court appeared to have been
much more thoroughly destroyed than on the west. The walls
of the apartment. No. 3, Avere continued northwardly, but
could not be traced except at intervals, as they ran under the
churchyard and tlie church ; and it was evident that the whole
mass of buildings had extended much further in that direction.
Perhaps there was another court. A transverse wall below the
room. No. 27, appeared also to lead to other buildings, so that
in spite of the immense extent of the building thus uncovered,
it appears that it was by no means the whole villa.
Our cut on page 237 gives a plan of as much of this exten-
240 THE ROMANS. [cirAP. vii.
sive building as lias been explored, and will furnish us with a
•general notion of its arrangeuients. It covers an area of five
hundred and fifty feet by above three lumch'ed feet. The ap-
proach was by a level platform from the south, with outbuild-
ings on the left, if not also on the right. Here the visitor
approached apparently a long dead wall, witli tlie grand portal
in the centre. On passing through the entrance gateway, he
found himself in an immense court, about a hundred and fifty
feet square, Avith masses of buildings on each side. In front
of him was another gateway, which led him into a second
court, ninety feet square, surrounded on three sides by a gallery,
or, as the ancients called it, cri/ptoportlcns, whicli was, no doubt,
either closed in, or capable of being closed in, as the hypo-
causts under it show that it was intended to be warmed. Op-
posite tlie gate by Avhich the visitor entered, was probably
another portal that led him through the northern ci-yptoporticus
into the gTand hall, No. 1, whicii was decorated with every
kind of ornamentation, and perhaps with a fountain or basin
of water in the middle. It is possible that beyond this there
was another small court, surrounded by buildings, the founda-
tions of which lie under the churchyard and church. A. simple
ghince at the plan is sufticient to show us that it is useless to
attempt to give any explanation of the mass of rooms which
surround these different courts. It seems reasonable to suppose
that the more elegant and private apartments were those built
round the inner court, a. The apartments round the little side
court, c, were perhaps, as Lysons supposed, baths and rooms
for purposes connected with them. Perhaps those on the other
side of the court were rooms for recreation and conversing, and
they seem to have been adorned with sculptures, and perhaps
with pictures, ornamental pottery, and plants.*
The only counnon feature in the Roman villas in Britain
seems to have been the large courts round which the buildings
were grouped : and it is in this alone that they bear any close
* The Roman villas no doubt long remained, as imposing ruins, after
the departure of the Romans, The earth gradually accumulated, till, at a
much later period, the upper parts of the walls were cleared away for the
materials, leaving the substructure underneath. The pavements have
sutfered most from being accidentally discovered, from time to time, by the
ignorant peasantiy, who broke them up, imagining that treasures wtrj
concealed under them. Perhaps the Caledonian or Saxon invaders oft* n
destroyed the pavements for the same cause. The early Saxons imagined
that all statues and busts were implements of magic, and that the dan-
gerous spell could only be broken by breaking them. Hence, we seldom
find more than frasuients of statues.
£^ W
>
CHAr. vir.] ROMAN VILLAS. 243
resemblance to the directions given bv Vitruvius.* In the villa
at Big-nor there were also two courts, larp;er even than those at
Woodchester, hut they ky with a different aspect, runniiiii;
north-west and south-east, instead of nearly north and south.
The inner court at Big-uor was surronnded hy a more perfect
aud extensive cryptoporticus than that at Woodchester. The
court itself was a parallelog-ram, not quite perfect, as the
northern side was a little louger that the side opposite. The
southern cryptoporticus measured a hundred and thirty-seven
feet nine inches in length, and eight feet in width. The westeru
cryptoporticus, extending across the width of the court, was
niuety-six feet long, by ten wide. The great outer court ajj-
])eared not to have had buildings round it, although traces oi
buildings were found towards the middle of the area. Therr
appears to have been a large entrance gate from the ontside ol
the building into the inner court on its sonthern side. The
baths, which were more extensive and more clearly defined than
at Woodchester, were attached to the inner conrt, near its sonth-
eastern corner. The cryptoporticus of the villa at Bignor had
had tesselated pavements ; the level of the floor on the northern
side was more elevated than the others, and at the northern
corner, where this northern cryptoporticns joined the western
one, there was a small sqnare room, with a very elegant pave-
ment, throngh which, by means of steps, people passed from one
into the other. The accompanying plate represents this room
as it appeared when first discovered. The painted stucco
remained fresh on the wall. The end of the floor of the
riorthern crypto]iorticus is seen to the right. It is singular that
nnder the middle of the court at Bignor, fonndations of old
walls were fonnd, which appeared to have belonged to a pre-
vious villa that had been rebuilt on a different plan. At North
Leigh, in Oxfordshire, the stone materials of a former building
had been made nse of, for the stones of an arch which were
found in one of the larger rooms, had been made out of frag-
ments of columns, and the monldings of bases and capitals still
remained on the back. The inner quadrangle only of this villa
has been explored, if it ever consisted of more than one. There
was a large entrance gateway with several rooms adjoining on the
south-eastern side, and the apartments round the other three
* Lysons iittempted to trace out the clesi<rn of the villa at Woodchester,
by api)lying' the rules <>iveii by Vitruvius, but I think without much suc-
c^^ss. ahhdugh that villa is uiore re^-nlar in its plan than most of the
others. To most of them the rules of Vitruvius seem quite inapplicable.
214 THE ROM.VXS. [cha-. vn.
sides are very numerous. Tlu^ (juadning-le is not an exact
square ; tlie dimensions of its four sides being, north-east, a
hundred and sixty-seven feet ; south-east, a hundred and
eighty-six feet ; soutli-west, a lumdred and lifty-three feet ; and
north-west, two hundred and thirteen feet.
Many of the Eoman villas hitherto discovered in this country
appear to have been of nearly equal extent with those described
above, and we derive an extraordinary notion of tlie condition
of the island at this period from the number of these extensive
and evidently magnificent buildings which have been discovered.
As these discoveries have generally been the result of accident,
there can be no doubt that we are only acquainted with a
small number of the villas which were scattered over the soil of
Britain. The number already discovered amounts proba])ly to
not less than a hundred. Some of the most magnificent lay in
the south-west. In Gloucestershire, besides the great villa at
Woodchester, and the extensive group wliich has already been
mentioned as scattered over the country around it, large villas
liave been discovered at Lidney Park, Great Witcombe, Eod-
niarton. Combe-end, Withington, Bisley, and Stancombe Park,
near Dursley. No less extensive villas have been found in
Somersetshire, at Combe St Nicholas, East Coker, and Wellow ;
in Wiltshire, at Bromham, Littlecote Park, Pitmead near
Warminster, and RudgenearProxfield; in Dorset, at Prampton,
Lenthy Green near Sherborne, and Halstock ; in Hampshire,
at Bramdean, Crondall, West Dean, and Thruxton ; in Sussex,
at Bignor, and in other places ; at Basildon, in Berkshire ; in
Oxfordshire, among many other places, at North Leigh,
Stonesfield, Great Lew, and Wigginton ; in Northamptonshire,
at Cottersbook, AVelden, Burrow Hill, Harpole, &c. ; in Not-
tinghamshire, at Mansfield Woodhouse. Kent and Essex appear
to have been covered with extensive villas, but they seem to
have been generally less magnificent than those in tlie west,
and no fine tesselated pavements have yet been found in them.
Li the former of these two counties they lay thickly scattered
along the road from Canterbury to London, and on the banks
of the Medway towards Maidstone, as well as on the southern
coast. Among the principal villas found in Essex are those at
West Mersey, discovered long ago, and those explored more
recently in tlie north-west of the county, at Icklington, Chester-
ford, and Hadstock. Lincolnshire appears to have been a
rich and important district, and large villas with magnificent
pavements have been found at Horkstow, Winterton, Roxby
CHAP. VII J ROMAN VILLAS. 245
near the Huinber, Hasehy, Storton, Scampton, and Grantham.
It must be borne in mind that Lincolnshire is comparatively
unexplored, and so are most of the northern and midland
counties. Yorkshire must have contained, many fine country
mansions of this kind, yet I am only aware of the discovery of
one, at Hovingham, in the North Riding. Some years ago,
remains of a Roman villa were found at Buxton, in Derbyshire,
which seems even at that early period to have been visited
for its mineral waters ; and several have been found on the
AVelsh border in Shropshire and Herefordshire, as well as in
North and South Wales.
Many of the villas which have been opened present unequi-
vocal traces of having been plundered and injured by the
violence of invaders, and sometimes they bear traces of having
been burnt. Here and there human bones have been found,
and while many of these may be accounted for by subsequent
interment, yet in some cases there can hardly be a doubt of
tlieir having belonged to persons who were slain when the
building was attacked. In 1833, some excavations at Silchester
brought to light Roman baths, in a good state of preservation,
having, like the baths discovered in the villas, leaden pipes to
carry off the water. In one of these pipes were found two
hundred Roman coins in brass, and in the bath lay a human
skeleton, which, with a slight stretch of the imagination, may
be supposed to have been that of an inhabitant of Calleva, who
had sought refuge there when the city was invaded by the
enemy, in the hope of saving his little treasure by concealing it
where no one would think of seeking for it. Perhaps, if we
carefully noted the articles of domestic use which are dug up in
the excavations, we might at least form probable conjectures on
the purposes of the rooms in which they were found. The
number of such articles found at Woodchester was much less
than might be expected from the space excavated ; they con-
sisted chiefly of several knives and choppers, a weight, a key,
some fibulae and buckles, and several hair-pins, and other small
personal ornaments of this kind ; two spears, and parts of
weapons, with a considerable quantity of pottery, and a certain
number of coins. The latter are always found scattered about.
"We are often tantalised by finding mere fraji-ments of what
might have given us the most important information relating to
the occupiers of these villas. Such are the fragments of in-
scriptions on the walls found at Woodchester. Inscribed stones
were found within the quadrangle of the villa at Pitney, but
246 THE ROMAXS. [chap. vii.
tliey also proved mere fragments, one of tliem having the
words : — ■
PATER
PATRI
SANC
The other, whicli appears to have been a sepulchral inscriptioa
and to commemorate probably some member of the household
who had been buried in the court, had the impeifect inscrip-
tion : —
VIXI SIN
TRIGINTA
Q,V,^ CAPI
KOXO A
The most interesting portion of the villas, as they now re-
main, is, however, the tesselated pavements. These are beau-
tiful as works of art, and interesting for the subjects they re-
present ; and they must have been the result of immense labour
and great skill. These tesselated pavements Avere not confined
to the country villas, but were used in the better mansions in
the towns, and examples have been found in London, Ciren-
cester, Gloucester, Caerleon, Caerwent, Kenchester, Leicester,
York, Aldborough, Lincoln, Colchester, Canterbury, Dorchester,
&c. Some of those found in London, Circencester, and Leices-
ter,* are of very superior execution. As I have stated before,
these pavements are formed with a number of small tesserae, or
cubes, set into a tine cement, and arranged in patterns or sub-
jects, somewliat in the manner of Berlin wool patterns; but in
the pavements the cubes are of different sizes, which enabled
the artist to give far more freedom to his lines and effect to his
])icture. The cubes were made of different substances, in order
to produce various shades of colour ; some being of stone, others
of terra-cotta, and others again of glass. Professor ]^uckman,
in his description of the beautiful pavements found in Cirences-
ter, has given us an excellent analysis of the materials of which
they are composed. Six of the colours employed there are
natural substances, and show us how skilfully the Eoman artist
turned to account the materials furnished by the neighbourhood.
* Part of an extremely fine Roman tesselated pavement lias been un-
covered in the cellar of a grocer in Leicester, who has kept it open, and
show's it to visitors at a shilling each. It is well worth visiting. The
jiriacipal pavements at Bignor, in Sussex, have also been kept open, and
tiiey are protected by buildings erected over them.
jiiiiiiiife
D
- SECTION -
Tessellated Pavements at Wroxeter, No. 1.
i
ciiAi'. VII.] TESSELATED PAYEMEXTS. 24S
White wns produced by small cubes of chalk, which, ou account
of its softness, was used very sparingly, and oidy where it was
necessary to produce very high relief. The hard, fine-grained
free-stone from the quarries round Cirencester furnished a cream
colour, and, when it had been exposed to a certain degree of
heat, it served for a grey. Tellow was furnished by tlie oolite
of the gravel drift of the district. The old red sandstone, from
Herefordshire, Avas used to produce a chocolate colour; and
slate-colour was furnished from the lime-stone bands of the
lower lias in the vale of Gloucester. Three colours, light red,
dark red, and black, were produced by terra-cotta ; and one, a
transparent ruby, by glass. Other materials are used in differ-
ent parts of the country, the coloured glass being always the
rarest. ' When the tessercTe were all set, and the cement hard-
ened, the finish appears to have been given by polishing over
the surface of the whole, which not only gave a j)erfectly smooth
surface to the floor, but increased the brilliance of the effect ;
the cream-coloured and grey stones, from their hardness, took a
fine polish, whilst we may conceive that the reds, being made of
terra-cotta, would remain opaque, and this very contrast tended
to heighten the effect, which was perhaps the reason why sub-
stances capable of high polish were not chosen in all instances.'
AVhen the tesselated floor had no hypocaust under it, it was
usually laid on a very substantial foundation. Mr George Maw,
of Benthall Hall, near Broseley, who carefully examined the
fragments of tesselated pavements recently discovered at Wrox-
eter, in the corridor of the large building supposed to be the
basilica of Uriconium, has given me the folloAving account of its
structure, with the drawings, from which the illustrations in our
two plates are engraved : — 'As one of the numerous evidences
of the great interest the Eomans entertained for this tesselated
work, the care and expense they w^ent to in the preparation of
the foundations may be noticed. At AVroxeter they consist of
four distinct strata of materials, forming together a bed between
two and three feet in thickness. Ou the native ground they
first placed a layer of large lumps of sandstone, rather irregu-
larly disposed, and above eighteen inches thick {e e in the sec-
tion in our first plate), the uneven surface of which was made
tolerably smooth by a bed of soft concrete or mortar {d d), ex-
actly like that now used in ordinary building. In breaking up
the foundations, its surface, pressed in between the broken
stones, looks, after an existence of fifteen hundred years, as
fresh as the day ou which it was prepared. On this bed of
250 THE ROMANS. [chap. vii.
mortar was placed the stratum (c c) on which the tesserae were
laid, about two aud a half inches thick, exceeding-lv hard and
evidently composed of a mixture of roug-hly- pulverised burnt
clay and lime, prepared with more care than the others, being
of a very uniform thickness, and having its upper and under
surfaces perfectly level. On this hard and even stratum the
tesserae {a a) were bedded in a layer of wliite and very hard
cement (b b), not more than half an inch thick. The patterns
of these Wroxeter pavements are all of a very simple descrip-
tion, and not comparable either in design or execution to many
existing specimens. They are mostly very simple arrang(!ments
of geometrical forms, surrounded by fret borders or plain bands,
consisting for the most part of but two materials, viz., a cream-
coloured compact limestone or marble, and a bluish-black lime-
stone. It is probable that both these materials have been
brought from a distance, or perhaps imported, as they occur
nowhere in the neighbourhood. The light stone is identical
with that of a similar colour composing the Roman mosaics
found on the continent and the mediaeval mosaics of Italy, where
it is called palombino- The dark stone appears to have been
sparingly used, as though it were difficult to procure. In the
plain dark margins next the walls it is replaced by a much
coarser stone of a dark green colour (travertine), obtained, I be-
lieve, at the foot of the Wrekin, close at hand. I^'ragments of
this stone also occur interspersed here and there in the body of
the pavements, probably used to repair them. In addition to
these three materials, bits of red earthenware are introduced in
a guilloche border surrounding one of the panels.'
In the subjects represented on these pavements, we observe
a considerable variety ; though, as far as the discoveries go, two
or three subjects seem to have been more popular than the
others. It is not impossible that the subjects thus chosen may
have had some reference to the purpose for which the room was
designed. One of the most popular subjects hitherto observed,
is that of Bacchus seated on a tiger or leopard, which perhaps
indicates a love of conviviality among the people to whom these
extensive residences belonged. This subject, which usually
forms the centre of a pavement, was found in the fine pavement
discovered in Leadenhall-street, in London ; in the pavement at
Thruxton ; and in others at Stonesfield and Frampton. Another
very popular central subject was Oi'pheus playing on the lyre,
which seems to have been a favourite, because it gave the oppor-
tunity of picturing birds and beasts in the field of the pavement.
i
Tessellated Pavements at Wroxeter, Xo. 2.
i
CHAP. VII.] TESSELATED PAVEMEXTS. 253
This subject lias been found in pavements at Woodcliester,
Horkstow, Winterton, and Littlecote. A field covered with
fishes and sea monsters is also not an uncommon subject, and
has been found at Witcombe, Cirencester, Withington, and
F^romham in Wiltshire. The four seasons formed anotlier
favourite subject, which has been fbund at Thruxton, Littlecote,
and Cirencester; in the latter place, the seasons are represented
bv heads in medallions, in a circle alternating with four other
medallions, of which two are destroved, but the two which re-
main contain respectively Bacchus on the ti^^-er, and Actseon.
At Littlecote, the seasons are represented by female fi^-ures
ridin'j- on difterent animals in a circle round the fi<rure of
Orpheus. The Gorgon's head forms a centre piece in pave-
ments found at Bignor and Bramdean ; an Amazon encounter-
ing a tiger, at Framptou ; Actseon, at Cirencester; Mercury,
at Dorchester ; and Hercules and Antaeus, at Bramdean. A
iine pavement at Horkstow was divided into compartments, each
containing a group of mythological and emblematical figures ;
along the side were represented chariot races, enlivened by
accidents, one carriage being overthrown by tlie wheel going
off, and another with tlie horse fallen down. The pavement at
East Coker represented hunting scenes, and, on a fragment pre-
served from destruction, w^ere seen the attendants carrying home
the slaughtered deer. On one of the pavements at Bignor
there is a border of winged Cupids, or Genii, in the characters
of gladiators, in armour, with sliields, swords, and tridents.
The large pavement at Frampton was also divided into compart-
ments containing mythological subjects, such as Bacchus, ISFep-
tune, Diana hunting, &c. On the sides of a compartment
containing a large bearded head of Neptune, was an inscription,
intended evidently for verse, and relating to the picture ; on one
side are the lines, —
KEPrVNl VERTEX REG MEN
SORTITI MOBILE VENTJS
On the other,- -
SCVLTVM CVI CERVLEA EST
DELFINIS CINCTA DVOBVS
Under a compartment, which was neai'ly desti'oyed, was the
fragment of another inscription, —
. . . NVS PERFICIS VI.LVM
. . . . GNARE CVPIDO.*
• Lysons supplies it: '■facinus perjicis ullnm . . . ignare citpido.* The
254 THE ROMANS. [CHAr. vii.
A pavement at Thruxton bore an inscription, wliicli seems to
have commemorated the person for whom the vilhi was built ;
but unfortunately only a portion of it remains perfect, whicli
is distinctly read as follows : — qvintvs natalivs natalinvs
ET BODENi. Of the line at the other side of the pavement
(the continuation of the inscription), frag-ments only of two
letters were found, apparently a V and an O, and some anti-
quaries have rather hastily concluded that these must have be-
longed to the word voto, and propose to read the whole Qniu.-
tiis Natfdlus Natal'uiHS et Bodeni fccerunt ex voto^ i.e., Quintus
Natalius Natalinus and the Bodeni have made this in fulfilment
of a vow. But there are strong reasons against such an inter-
pretation : it is not probable that this is a votive offering ; the
l^odeni seem to be an invention of the interpreter, and a com-
parison of the space with the number of letters in the tirst
half of ihe inscription and the position of the fragments, will
show that there must have been more letters in the lost part
than ai'e here supplied, and that the last o of the supposed voto
was not the end of the inscription. We should perhaps have
found a letter or two at the beginning of the second line, which
would have completed the name of the Avife of Quintus Nata-
lius Natalinus.*
It must be observed that, when we compare the different
pavements representing the same subject, we do not find them
copied after the same model, or treated in the same manner.
It is also curious that the subjects most frequently repeated
were the same on the continent as in Britain, The central
Orpheus, with his circle of animals, has been found in a pave-
ment at St Colombe, in Prance, and in one at cr near Friburg,
in Switzerland ; the Gorgon's head has also been found in
pavements in France ; and a pavement of fishes and sea mon-
sters was found at Pan. Perhaps the artists who made the
pavements, carried about with them a professional list of sub-
jects which they ottered for choice, if their employer had not a
subject of his own to propose.
It is impossible to discover, from the appearance of these
villas, to what class of the comnumity they usually belonged,
but we can hardly doubt that their owners were men of wealth,
meaning: these inscriptions were intended to convey, is more evident than
the construction of the words.
* Tlie interpretation alluded to was proposed by the late Dr Ingram, of
O.K.ford, and has been recently published under the sanction of the Ar-
chajological Institute of Great Britain, in the proceedings of the Salisbury
meetiu';- of 1849.
CHAP. vilI the state OF AGRICULTURE. 2o,^
who souglit here that splendid country retirement to which we
know the Roman gentry were much attached. When we con-
sider the great nnmber of rooms which were grouped round the
different courts, we must be convinced that the lord of the
mansion had a numerous household, troops of slaves, and
ineiiials, and clients ; and it is not improbable that some of the
buildings, more distant from the domestic apartments of the
lamily, were separate dwellings, tenanted by his farmers, and
even by their labourers. But the peasantry in general, no
doubt, lived in huts, slightly constructed, and of perishable
materials, either separately, or grouped together in villages.
These villages are apparently the settlements, the nature of
which has been described in a former chapter, and which have
been commonly called British villages. The coins and other
remains found in them, show that they belonged to the Roman
period, but it is highly probable that the peasantry who inhabited
them were chiefly of the old British race.
We know very little of the state of agriculture in this island
under the Romans, though, as it was celebrated for its fertility,
it was probably extensively and highly cultivated. When
Cirsar visited the island, he remarked chiefly the large herds of
cattle, which are the principal wealth of uncivilised peoples,
but under the Romans it appears to have been celebrated for
the production of corn. The emperor Julian, in one of his
orations, states that when he commanded in Gaul, about the
year 360, agriculture had been so entirely interrupted in the
countries bordering on the Ehine, by the ravages of \va\\ that
the population was in danger of perishing by famine. In this
emergency, Julian caused six hundred corn-ships to be built
on the Rhine, with timber from the forest of the Ardennes, and
these made several voyages to the coast of Britain, and, return-
ing up the Rhine laden with British corn, distributed it among
the towns and fortresses on that river, and he thus obtained a
sufficient supply to prevent the threatened calamity. Gibbon
has supposed that each of Julian's corn-ships carried at least
seventy tons, which I am told is a very low estimate. But
taking this, and reckoning wheat at sixty pounds a bushel, the
six hundred vessels would have carried at eacli voyage a hun-
dred and ninety-six thousand quarters, which would not be
a very large export. But as we are ignorant of the number of
voyages tliey made, and the estimate of tonnage is perhaps too
small, we are justified in supposing that the expoit was large
enough to prove that this country was vrny extensively, and,
2o6
THE no MAX S.
[chap. VII.
perliaps, for the a,2,-e, very well cultivated. In many parts of
Jiritain wc find distinct marks of former cultivation o.i laud
which is now common, and has certain'y lain fallow for ages,
and it is not impossible that it may have been the work of the
lloman ploughshare. A curious legend has been told in some
parts to explain these appearances of ancient cultivation ; it is
pretended that when, in the time of king John, the country lay
under an interdict, the pope's ban fell expressly on all cultivated
laiul, and that the superstitious peasantry, imagining that the
lauds which were not cultivated when the bull was written were
excepted from its eti'ects, left their cultivated lands, and
>Y ploughed the wastes and commons as long as the interdict
lasted. The suggestion made above is at least as probable an
explanation as the legend. Mr Bruce observed similar traces of
cultivation on the waste lands in Northumberland, and he is
probably right in attributing them to the Eomans. ' A little
to the south of Borcovicus,' he says, 'and stretching w^estward,
the ground has been thrown up in long terraced lines, a mode
of cultivation much practised in Italy and the East. Similar
terraces, more feebly developed, appear at Bradley ; I have seen
them very distinctly marked on the banks of the Eede-water, at
old Carlisle, and in other places.' It is probable that Julian's
corn-ships came for theii* cargoes to the Tyne or the Humber.
Bronze of a Roman Plouiihuiau.
To judge by the accompanying cut, the plough used in Roman
Britain was rather of a primitive construction. It represents a
lloman bronze, said to have been found at Piersebridge in
Yorkshire, and now in the collection of Lord Londesborough.
CHAP. VII.] HUNTING. 257
The %ure of the ploughman f^ives us probably a correct picture
of the costume of the Eomano-British peasant. Fruit-trees
were also cultivated with care, and the Komans are said to have
introduced, among others, the cherry. We may probably add
the vine.
One of the chief occupations of country life among- the higher
classes was the chase, to which the Romans were much attached.
If we cast our eyes over the map of Roman Britain, we per-
ceive considerable tracts of land which the great roads avoided,
and in which there were apparently no towns. These were
forest districts, represented by the mediaeval forests of Cham-
wood, Sherwood, and others, which abounded in beasts of the
chase. Some of the more extensive forests were inhabited by
wild boars, and even by wolves. The chase of the boar appears
to have been a favourite pursuit in Britain. An altar was
found at Durham, dedicated to the god Silvanus, by the prefect
of an ala of soldiers, who had slain an extraordinary fine boar,
which had set all the hunters before him at defiance.* At
Birdoswald in Northumberland {Jmboglanna), was found a
small altar dedicated also to Silvanus by the hunters of Banna.f
Tlie Roman pottery, made in Britain, was frequently ornamented
with hunting scenes, in which the stag or the hare is generally
the victim, and it gives us pictures of the dogs for which Britain
was famous. I These are at times represented with something
of the character of the modern bull-dog or mastiff, Avhile others
have the more delicate form of the greyhound and stag-hound.
Skulls of dogs found at VVroxeter have been pronounced to be
tliose of mastiffs and greyhounds. The classic waiters contain
not unfrequent allusions to the dogs of Britain. Claudian,
eniunerating those peculiar to different countries, speaks of the
British breed as capable of overcoming bulls : —
' Mag-uaque tauroruiu fracturae colla BritanricB.'
* SILVANO INVICTO SACUUM C TETIVS YETVRIVS MICIANVS PUJEF
ALAE SEBOSIANAE 015 APRVM EXIMIAE FORMAE CAPTVM QVEM MVLTI
ANTECESSOUES EIVS PRAEDARI NON POTVERVNT V. S. L. P. This iu-
scription is given in Camden.
t Banna was a town or station not mentioned in the Notitia Imperii, or
in the Itineraries, but it is found in the list of Roman to^^^ls in Britain
piven in the Ravenna Cosmography, which places it between ^^sica and
Uxellodunum. An ornamental bronze cup was found in a rubbish pit at
Rudge in Wiltshire, more than a century ag'o, having the names of five of
these towns in an inscription round the rim — aballava vxellodvm g
AMBOGLAN s BANNA . A . MAIS. It secms to have been made for a club
or society of persons belonging to these towns, perhaps hunters.
X Figures of these dogs will be given in the next chapter.
2')S TTIE ROMAX=^. [chap. vii.
The more dcjcately-slinped (I02:, often iour.J on the Roinano-
Hritish pottery, appears to be the one named by the Romans
TO'traguH, which was also (hn'ived from this island. Martial
says, —
' Nr.n sibi, sed domirio, venarur vertrag-us acer,
Illesuiu loporem qui tibi dente feret."
And Nemesiati speaks of the export of British honnds for the
purpose of huntin<i; : —
' Sed non Spartanos tantum, tantuinve molossos
Pa^jcendum catulos ; uivisa Britannia niittit
Veloccs, uostrique orbis vcuatibus aptc^:/
CHAP, VIII.] ROMAN MANUFACTUEER. 259
CHAPTER VIII.
Manufactures of the Romans in Britain — Pottery— The LJpchurch Ware
— Dymchurch — The Potteries at Durobrivse — The Samian Ware —
Romano- Salopian Wares — Other Varieties — Terra-cottas — Roman
Glass — Kimmeridge Coal Manufacture — Mineral Coal — Metals — The
Roman Iron Works in Britain ; Sussex, the Forest of Dean, &c. — Tin
and Lead — Other Metals — Bronze— The Arts ; Sculpture — Medicine ;
the Oculists' Stamps — Trades ; a Goldsmith's Sign.
With a considerable population, great riches, as evinced by
its numerous splendid villas, and an advanced state of civilisa-
tion, manufactures and trade must doubtless have been carried
on in Britain to a very considerable extent. Many of these
were naturally of a description wliich left few traces behind
them, but of the existence of others we have proofs of a more
substantial kind, and as they form a rather important class of
our antiquities, they deserve especial attention. We begin with
that of which the remains are most numerous, the pottery.
Any one who has sailed up the Medway, will have observed
that the left bank of the river, a little above Sheerness, consists
of low flat ground, cut by the water into innumerable little
creeks, and at high water almost buried by the sea. This is
called the HalstoAV and the TJpchurch marshes. In the time of
the Romans the channel of the river appears to have been here
nnich narrower, and the ' marshes ' had not been encroached
upon by the sea as they are now. If we go up the little creeks
in the ITpchurch marshes at low water, and observe the sides of
tlie banks, we shall soon discover, at the depth of about three
feet, more or less, a stratum, often a foot thick, of broken pot-
tery. This is especially observable in what is called Otterham
creek, and also in Lower Halstow creek, where it may be traced
continuously in the banks, and may be brought up by handfuls
from the clay in the bed of the creek. This immense layer of
u
2G0 THE ROMANS. [chap. \ul
broken pottery, mixed with plenty of vessels in a perfect, or
nearly perfect, state, has been traced at intervals through an
extent of six or seven miles in length, and two or three in
breadth, and there cannot be the least doubt that it is the re-
fuse of very extensive potteries, which existed probably during
nearly the whole period of the Roman occupation of Britain,
and which not only supplied the whole island w^ith a particular
class of earthenware, but which perhaps also furnished an ex-
port trade ; for we find urns and other vessels precisely similar
to the Upchurch ware in considerable quantity among- tlie
Roman pottery dug up in the neighbourliood of Boulogne.
The clay which constitutes the soil in tlie Upchurch marshes is
very tenacious, of a dark colour, and of fine quality, well calcu-
lated for the manufacture of pottery.
The prevailing colour of the Upchurch pottery, which is of a
fine and hard texture, is a blue-black, which was produced by
baking it in the smoke of vegetable substances. A sufficient
number of perfect examples have been found, to show that the
variety of forms was almost infinite ; but a few of the more
remarkable are given in the lower group on the accompanying
plate. The patterns with which it is ornamented, though gener-
ally of a simple character, are also extremely diversified. Some
are ornamented with bands of half-circles, made with compasses,
and from these half-circles lines are in many instances drawn to
the bottoms of the vessels with some instrument like a notched
piece of wood. Some are ornamented with wavy intersections
and zigzag lines ; while on others, the ornament is formed by
raised points, encircling the vessels in bands, or grouped into
circles, squares, and diamond patterns. The crosseJ-lined
pattern of the large urn in the back-ground of our group, is a
very connnon one. Mr Roach Smith has found tracings of
buildings in the neighbourhood of the marshes, which perhaps
mark the habitations of the potters. It is evident from the
extent of the bed of pottery, that a great number of workmen
must have been en^ployed here; and, as might be expected, v.e
scarcely excavate a Roman site in any part of the island without
finding samples of the Upchurch ware.
There can, indeed, be no doubt that the Upchurch marshes
furnished a great proportion of the commoner pottery used in
Roman Britain. A few years ago, as Mr James Elliott of
Dymchurch, the engineer of the Dymchurch marshes, was carry-
ing on excavations connected with the works of the sea-wall
Vhei'e, where the clay difiers not much from that at Upchurch,
I
E.oniau Pottery from C(is,tov (Dnrohivce).
Koman Pottery from the Upchurfh ;Marshes.
Y. 263. Castor, N()rthaniiiton8liire (Ditrobiivce).
V. 264. Roman Pottery-kiln, at Sib.son.
CHAP. VIII.]
UrCHURCH POTTERY.
2G3
he found traces of extensive potteries on that part of the south-
ern Kentish coast. The examination of the ground was not
carried out sufficiently to decide on the character of tlie ware
manufactured there, but the fragments seemed to be rather those
of amphorae, and such-like vessels, than the sort of pottery made
at Upclmrch.
The site of the potteries which produced another prevailing
sort of Romano-British pottery, was discovered by the late Mr
Artis, at Castor, on the eastern boundaries of Northamptonshire,
the site of the Roman town of Durobrivse. These potteries
extended thence westward, along the country bordering on the
Nen, to the neighbourhood of Wansford. The Durobrivian
pottery was of a superior quality, and adorned with more ele-
gance than that made in the Upcliurch marshes. Some ex-
amples of this ware are given in the upper group on our plate.
It also is usually of a bluish or slate colour, but the ornaments,
which are in relief, and added with the hand after the vessel had
been made and burned, are sometimes white. They consist
often of elegant scrolls, like those in our engraving, and of a
variety oi other patterns. Among these, scenes of stag and
hare hunting are very common, and they are executed with a
freedom of touch which shows much artistic skill in the work-
men. The annexed cut represents on a diminished scale one of
Hunting Subject, from Durobrivian pottery.
these hunting scenes, in which we have a picture of a British
stag-hound. In some rare instances, figures of men are intro-
duced, urging on the dogs, or spearing the stag or boar : and
the costume of these figures indicates a rather late period of thf
Roman sway in Britain. In the pictures of hare-hunting scenes
the dog has much the same form as that here represented, but
in some fragments, of which our second cut is an example, we
see a dog of a stronger and fiercer description, which, perhaps,
if we had the whole pattern, would be found to be engaged in
264 THE ROMANS. [chap. viii.
hunting the boar. Other favourite representations on tliis pot-
tery were dolphins and other fishes. In-
dented vases, usually of a dark copper colour,
like that in the middle of our group, are
also characteristic of the potteries of Duro-
brivjB : in examples found at Chesterfield,
in Essex, these indentations are filled with
figures of the principal deities, in white.
Similar pottery appears to have been manu-
factured in Flanders ; and the large urn in
the back-ground of our group was found at British Dog.
Bredene, in the department of the Lis.
The Roman potteries at Castor have a peculiar interest from
the circmnstance that Mr Artis's researches were there rewarded
by the discovery of the potters' kilns, and that he was thus
enabled to investigate the process of the manufacture. This we
shall be best able to describe in his own words, giving in the
accompanying engraving a sketch of one of the kilns, as it ap-
peared when uncovered. One of these kilns, discovered in
1844 at Sibson, near Wansford, Mr Artis described as folloAvs :
— ' This kiln,' he says, ' had been used for firing the common
blue or slate-coloured pottery, and had been built on part of the
site of one of the same kind, and within a yard and a half of
one that had been constructed for firing pottery of a difi'erent
description. The older exhausted kiln, which occupied part of
the site of that under consideration, presented the appearance of
very early work ; the bricks had evidently been modelled with
the hand, and not moulded, and the workmanship was alto-
gether inferior to that of the others, which were also in a very
mutilated state ; but the character of the work, the bricks, the
mouths of the furnaces, and the oval pedestals which supported
the floors of the kilns, were still apparent. The floors had been
broken up some time previous to the site being abandoned, and
the area had then been used as a receptacle for the accumulated
rubbish of other kilns.
' During an examination of the pigments used by the Roman
potters of this place,' Mr Artis continues, ' I Avas led to the
conclusion that the blue and slate-coloured vessels met with
here in such abundance, were coloured by suftbcating the fire of
the kiln, at the time when its contents had acquired a degree of
heat sufficient to insure uniformity of colour. I had so firmly
made up my mind upon the process of manufacturing and firing
this peculiar kind of earthenware, that, for some time previous
! ^
«
p^
Wft''^ ;'^'0.
1
ciiAi'. VIII.] SMOTHER KILXS. 267
to the recent discoveiy, I had denominated the kilns in wliich
it had been fired, smother kilns. The mode of manufacturing
the bricks of which these kilns are made, is worthy of notice.
Tlie clay was previously mixed with about one-third of rye in
the chalV, which, being' consumed by t]\e lire, left cavities in the
room of the grains. This might have been intended to modify
expansion and contraction, as well as to assist the gradual dis-
tribution of the colouring vapour. The mouth of the furnace
and top of the kiln were no doubt stopped ; thus we find every
part of the kiln, from the inside wall to the earth on the outside,
and every part of the clay wrappers of the dome, penetrated with
the colouring exhalation. As further proof that the colour of
the ware was imparted by firing, I collected the clays of the
neighbourhood, including specimens from the immediate vicinity
of the smother-kilns. In colour, some of these clays resembled
the Avare after firing, and some were darker. I submitted them
to a process similar to that I have described. The clays, dug
near the kilns, whitened in firing, probably from being bitumin-
ous. I also put some fragments of the blue pottery into the
kiln ; they came out precisely of the same colour as the clay
fired with them, which had been taken from the site of the kilns.
The experiment proved to me that the colour could not be
attributed to any metallic oxide, either existing in the clay, or
applied externally ; and this conclusion is confirmed by the ap-
pearance of the clay wrappers of the dome of the kiln. It
should be remarked, that this colour is so volatile, that it is ex-
pelled by a second firing in an open kiln.
' I have now traced these potteries to an extent of upwards
of cwenty miles.* They are principally confined to the gravel
beds on the banks of the Nen and its tributary streams ; the
clay used at some of them appears to have been collected at
some little distance from the works. The kilns are all con-
structed on the same principle. A circular hole was dug, from
three to four feet deep, and four in diameter, and walled round
to the height of two feet. A furnace, one-third of the diameter
of the kiln in length, communicated with the side. In the
centre of the circle so formed was an oval pedestal, the height
of the sides, with the end pointing to the furnace mouth. Upon
this pedestal and side wall the floor of the kiln rests. It is
formed of perforated angular bricks, meeting at one point in the
* Mr Artis, in another report, estimates the number of hands who must
Iiiive been employed at once in the Durobriviun potteries, at not lesi than
two thousand.
2l>8 THE llOMANS. [chap. viii.
centre. The fiimac^is arclied with bricks moulded for the
purpose. The sides oT~ttie kiln are constructed with curved
bricks, set edgeways, in a thick slip (or liquid) of the same
material, to the height of two feet.* I now proceed to describe
the process of packing the kiln, and securing uniform heat in
firing the ware, which was the same in the two different kinds
of kilns. They were first carefully loose-packed with the articles
to be fired, up to the height of the side walls. The circum-
ference of the bulk was then gradually diminished, and finished
in the shape of a dome. As this arrangement progressed, an
attendant seems to have followed the packer, and thinly covered
a layer of pots with coarse hay or grass. He then took some
thin clay, the size of his hand, and laid it flat on the grass upon
the vessels ; he then placed more grass on the edge of the clay
just laid on, and then more clay, and so on until he had com-
pleted the circle. By this time the packer would have raised
another tier of pots, the plasterer folloAving as before, hanging
the grass over the top edge of the last layer of plasters, until he
had reached the top, in which a small aperture was left, and the
clay nipt round the edge ; another coating would be laid on as
before described. Gravel or loam was then thrown up against
the side wall where the clay wrappers were commenced, pro-
bably to secure the bricks and the clay coating. The kiln was
then fired with wood.f In consequence of the care taken to
place grass between the edges of the wrappers, they could be
unpacked in the same sized pieces as when laid on in a plastic
state, and thus the danger in breaking the coat to obtain the
contents of the kiln could be obviated.
' In the course of my excavations, I discovered a curiously-
constructed furnace, of which I have never before or since met
with an example. Over it had been placed two circular earthen
fire vessels (or cauldrons) ; that next above the furnace was a
third less than the other, Avhich would hold about eight gallons.
The fire passed partly imder both of them, the smoke escaping
by a smoothly-plastered flue, from seven to eight inches wide.
The vessels were suspended by the rims fitting into a circular
groove or rabbet, formed for the purpose. The composition of
* See the kiln represented in the accompanying engravinp:, in which the
two labourers are standing on the original level of the ground, while the
single man, with the spade, stands on a level with the bottom of the pit in
which the kiln was built.
+ In the furnace of a kiln discovered by Mr Artis in 1822, there was a
layer of wood ashes from four to five inches thick. This kiln, which was
iu a very perfect state, was covered in again undisturbed.
I
CHAP. VIII.] DUROBRIVIAX POTTERY. 2P0
the vess(3ls was that of a clay tempered with penny-earth. They
contained some perfect vessels and many frag-ments. It is
probable they had covers, and I am inclined to think were
used for glazing peculiar kinds of the immense quantities of
ornamented ware made in this district. Its contiguity to one
of the workshops in which the glaze (oxide of iron) and some
other pigments were found, confirms this opinion.'
Mr Artis then proceeds to explain the process by which the
Diu'obrivian pottery was ornamented. ' The vessel, after being
thrown upon the wheel, would be allowed to become somewhat
firm, but only suihciently so for the purpose of the lathe. In
the indented ware, the indenting would have to be performed
w'th the vessel in as pliable a state as it could be taken fi'om
the lathe. A thick slip of the same body would then be pro-
cured, and the ornamenter would proceed by dipping the
thumb, or a round mounted instrument, into the slip. The
vessels, on which are displayed a variety of hunting subjects,
representations of fishes, scrolls, and human figures, were all
glazed after the figures were laid on ; where, however, the
decorations are white, the vessels were glazed before the orna-
ments were added. Ornamenting with figures of animals was
eflected by means of sharp and blunt skewer instruments, and
a slip of sui*^able consistency. These instruments seem to have
been of two kinds : one thick enough to carry sufficient slip
for the nose, neck, body, and front thigh ; the other of a more
delicate kind, for a thinner slip for the tongue, lower jaws, eye,
foi'e and hind legs, and tail. There seems to have been no
retouching after the slip trailed from the instrument. Field
sports seem to have been favourite subjects with our Ilomano-
l^ritish artists. The representations of deer and hare hunts
are gdt)d and spirited ; the courage and energy of the hounds,
and the distress of the hunted animals, are given with great
skill and fidelity, especially when the simple and oft'-hand
process, by which they must have been executed, is taken into
consideration.'
The two descriptions of pottery just described were undoubt-
edly made in England ; the Upchui'ch ware is found more or less
in almost all Roman sites, but that manufactured at Durobrivte
is by no means so common. We now come to a third description
of pottery, which is found in great quantities in Britain, though
we have every reason for believing that it was not made in this
island. It is that which is usually termed Sainian ware ; and,
if it be not the pure Samian pottery of antiquity, it appears to
270 THE ROMAXS. [chap. viii.
have been an inferior description of the same class of ware.
The Samian ware was of g:reat repute among the ancients, and
is frequently alluded to by Roman writers as that most used at
table. It appears certain that it was of a red colour, and the
terms applied to it in the classic authors answer to the specimens
which are found in such g-reat abundance in England.* It is
frequently mentioned by Plautus as the ordinary ware used at
table, as well as for sacred purposes. Pliny speaks of it as
being in common use for the festive board ; and he gives
the names of several places famous for their pottery, amonii"
which Arctium, in Italy, holds the first place. Sarrentum,
Asta, and Pollentia, in Italy, Saguntum in Spain, and Perga-
mus in Asia Minor, were, as we learn from this wiiter, cele-
brated for the manufacture of cups. Tralleis in Lydia, and
Mutina in Italy, were also eminent for manufactures of earthen-
ware. The manufactures of these different places were ex-
ported to distant countries. f Isidore of Seville, at the end of
the sixth century (he died in 610), speaks of the red pottery
made at Arctium (tlie modern Arezzo) which he calls Aretine
vases, and also of Samian ware, wath an expression of doubt as
to the exact locality w^hich produced the latter ; so that it was
probably made under that name in diflerent parts of Roman
Europe. Modern researches at Arezzo, in Italy, have not only
brought to light a considerable quantity of the Aretine ware,
but also the remains of the kilns in which it was baked ; and a
scholar of that place, A. Eabroni, has published a book on the
subject, under the title of Storia degli antlcJd VasiJiUiUAret'mi.
The specimens given in his engravings bear a general resem-
blance to the Samian Avare found in Britain, and there are
some points in which the one seems to be imitated from the
other, yet there are also some very strongly marked circum-
stances in which they differ. The names of the potters are
different, and they are marked in a different form and position
* Among a large and very curious collection of Grfeco-Roman terra-
cottas from Lycia, are some fragments of red ware, closely resembling what
we call Samian ware, with the potter's name, in Greek, similarly impress-
ed. These are now in the possession of Mr Mayer of Liverpool. Perhaps
they are samples of pure Samian w^are.
+ The words of Pliny {Hist. Nat., lib. xxxv. c. 12) are as follows :
' Major quoque pars hominum terrenis utitur vasis. Samia etiamnum in
esculentis laudantur. Retinet hanc nobilitatem et Arctium in Italia ; et
calicum tantum Surrentum, Asta, Pollenlia ; in Hispania, Saguntum ; in
Asia, Pergainuiu. Habent et Tralleis opera sua, et Mutina in Italia ; quo-
niam et sic gentes nobilitantur. Ha3c quoque per niaria terrasque ultro
citruque purtantur, insignibus rota? officinis Erythris.'
o
C5
CHAP. VIII.] SAMIAN WAllK. 273
on Ihe vessels ; the red of the Aretiiie ware is of a deeper shade,
the fig-ures are in a superior style of art, and they seem to be of
an earlier date.
The common Samian ware is of an extremely delicate texture,
having somewhat the appearance of fine red sealing-wax. The
vessels composed of it are of all sizes and sliapes, sometimes
strong-, but more frequently thin, and consequently very fragile;
and it is only under favourable circumstances that we find them
unbroken. The frailty of the pure Samian ware appears, in
classical times, to have been proverbial ; when, in Plautus, a
person is desired to knock gently, he exclaims, in surprise,
' You seem to fear that the door is made of Samian ware.'
M. Placide pulta. P. Metuis, credo, ne fores Samise sient. —
MciticcJim., 1. 98,
And, on another occasion, the brittleness of Samian ware is
directly mentioned —
Vide, quaeso, ne quis tractet illam indili^ens —
Scis tu, ut confringi vas cito Samiuni s(jlet. — Bacch., 1. 166.
It is by no means unusual to find bowls and paterae of the ware
of which we are speaking, that have been broken by their
possessors in former times, and subsequently mended, generally
l)y means of leaden, but sometimes of bronze, rivets. This
shows the value which must generally have been set upon it.
The question whether this so-called Samian ware was ever
manufactured in Britain has given rise to some discussion among
antiquaries. In the mouth of the Thames, a short distance from
the Kentish coast between Eeculver and Margate, is a spot
known popularly by the name of the Pan Kock, and Pudding-
pan Sand, because, almost from time immemorial, the fishermen
in dragging there have been accustomed to bring up pieces of
ancient pottery, and not unfrcquently entire vessels. These
are chiefiy of the fine red or Samian ware. It was at first
supposed that these marked the site of an extensive manufac-
ture of this ware ; but other writers suggested as a more
probable explanation that some Roman ships laden with it, per-
haps from the potteries on the Rhine, had been wrecked in this
place, and the notion that it was the site of a pottery seems to
be abandoned. More recently, fragments of this ware having
been picked up about the Upchurch marshes, I believe in one
or two spots rather plentifully, it has been supposed that it
might have been manufactured there, and by experiment it
274
THE ROMANS.
[chat. vrii.
appeared that the chiy of the locality was capable of being
made into similar ware. But the evidence that such ware was
manufactured there appears to be quite insufficient ; and the
opinion g^enerally received among antiquaries, after all the dis-
cussion which has taken place, seems to be, that the Samian
ware was not made in England, but that it was imported from
the continent.
The accompanying engraving represents a group of vessels
of Samian ware found in England ; but it is far from givini]^
Subiects troni Siiinian ware.
any notion of the great variety of forms, or the still greater
diversity of ornament, which they present. Many of the
smaller vessels are quite plain, or are merely adorned with the
ivy-leaf, a very favourite ornament on this kind of ware. The
characteristic moulding is the festoon and tassel, to which the
somewhat inappropriate term of egg-and-tongue border has
been given. The subjects represented on the more ornamental
vessels are extremely varied. Many of them are groups taken
from the ancient mythology, such as the labours of Hercules,
the amours of Jupiter, Diana surprised by Acta^on, and Actaeon
attacked by his dogs, Apollo and Daphne, and figures of Venus
and other personages of ancient fable. Many of the figures
and groups were evidently copied from some of the well-known
masterpieces of ancient art; thus we have Jupiter and Leda,
I
CHAP. VIII.] SAMIAN rOTTERY. 275
an evident imitation of a celebrated sculpture at Rome, and the
fi»-ures of the Farriese Hercules, the Apollo Belvidere, and the
Venus de Medici, are often repeated. Some represent genii,
Cupids riding" upon marine animals, tritons, grifhns, and other
imaginary beings : others again represent domestic scenes,
hunting subjects, gladiatorial combats, groups of musicians and
dancers, and subjects of a still more miscellaneous description.
In the preceding cut are given three samples of the more com-
mon subjects — combats of gladiators — the war between the
pygmies and the cranes — and a dancing scene. Another series
of designs comprises scrolls of foliage, fruits, and flowers, ar-
ranged in different manners, and always with great elegance.
A multitude of the Samian vases found in this country, as well
as other articles, such as lamps, bronzes, and even knife-handles,
represent licentious scenes of the most infamous description.
Prinking vessels of this class are alluded to by Pliny ; * and
tlieir comparative frequency in Britain, shows how deeply not
only the manners but the vices of Rome had been planted in
this distant province.
A great proportion of the vessels in this ware have the
name of the ])otter stamped in a label, usually at the bottom,
in the inside, but sometimes, especially on the embossed bowls,
on the outside. The manner in which the label is stamped
across the centre of the vessel is shown in the accompany-
ing cut, from a specimen found at Wroxeter (?7r/co;«w?;?). In
this instance the reading of the name is somewhat obscure,
fi'om the doubtful character of the two letters in the middle,
which may either be ligatured letters,
each standing for de, or merely capricious
forms of the d. In the former case it
might be read tededei. It is probable,
however, that there is only one liga-
ture, and that we must read the name teddi. The name is
given in the nominative with f for fecit, or in the genitive,
with o, or OF, or m, for officina or manu : thus sabinvs f.
Sabinus fecit (Sabinus made it), amici m., Jmici manu
(by the hand of Amicus), of. felic, officina Felicis (from
the workshop of Pelix). The name was often put merely in
the genitive singular, without the addition of of, or m, as in
* ' In poculia libidines cnelare juvit ac per obscaenifates hVoevc.'—TUn.
Unt. Nat., lib. xxxiii., proa'iu. ' Yasa adulteriis ccplata.'— i^., lib. xiv.
c. 22.
276
THE ROMANS.
[ciiAr. viri.
the example in the foregoing cut. These names, of whicli
long lists have been made, are many of them Gaulish and
German, and they seem to point to the countries from whence
this class of pottery was derived. In fact, potteries of the
ware we term Samian have been found in Trance, particularly
on the banks of the Rhine, as at Brusche (Bas-Rhin), Lux-
embourg, Saverne (near Strasburg), and e.specially at Rhein-
zabern, in Bavaria. In these places not only have the potters'
kilns been found, but the moulds, and the implements for
stamping borders and names. Tlie annexed cut represents
Potters' stamps from Gaul.
two sucli stamps, from potteries discovered at Lezoux in
Auvergne. One has been used for stamping the pattern so
commonly found serving as a sort of frieze round the vessel ;
the other the stamp of the potter's name, austri . of, and as
this name occurs on the Samian ware found in England, it fur-
nishes at least one proof of importation. Some of the moulds
from Rheinzabern are now preserved in the national museum in
Paris. These are earthenware bowls, with the figures impressed
on the inner surface, so that the A^essel when formed of soft clay,
being placed in the mould and pressed in it, took the figures in
relief, and when dry had shrunk sufficiently to be taken out.
Sometimes the moulds were made in more than one piece, like
our moulds for plaster-of- Paris casts, but this was only when
I
CHAP. Tin.] OTHER KINDS OF POTTERY. 277
the subjects were in hi<j:lier relief. The impressions in tlie
moulds seem to have been made by a great number of small
stamps, each contaiuiup; a single ornament, or a single figure or
group, and these were varied continually in making the moulds.
It is thus that we see the same figure often repeated on differ-
ent examples of the pottery witli totally different accompa-
niments. This also explains why the figures on the pottery
are so seldom sharp and fresh ; in the course of making
the impressions in the moulds and casting from them the im-
j)ressiou had become imperfect, and the figures look often like
impressions in sealing-wax rubbed or bruised. The clay seems
1o have received its redness from some substance mixed up with
it, which is supposed to have been oxides of iron and lead.
The kilns found in Prance appear to have borne a general re-
semblance to those discovered by Mr Artis. A few examples
of this red ware, which are now chiefly in the collection of Mr
Roach Smith, have been found in England, exhibiting a much
higher degree of artistic excellence, the figures of which are in
higher relief than the others, and have not been made with the
pottery, but moulded separately and then attached to the sur-
face of the vessel. This class of pottery is very rare. The
ware found in these foreign potteries is identical with that
which our anti([uaries have agreed to call Samian ware in Eng-
1(1 nd, it evidently came from the same moulds, and the potters'
names are the same, so that we have little room for doubting
tliat it was im])orted into this country. I believe, however,
that Mr Artis discovered in the Durobrivian potteries traces of
an unsuccessful attempt to imitate the foreign red ware, and
such imitations of the Samian ware have been found among the
pottery at Wroxeter.
On this last-mentioned site, the Koman city of Uriconium, a
considerable quantity of different sorts of pottery have been
found, uo doubt of local manufacture, as they are evidently
made from the clays of the Severn valley, apparently from the
neighbourhood of Broseley. Two sorts, especially, are found
in considerable abundance, the one white, the other of a rather
light red colour. The white ware, which is made of what is
commonly called Broseley clay, and is rather coarse in texture,
consists chiefly of rather handsomely-shaped jugs, of different
sizes, the general form of which is represented by the example
given in the accompanying cut ; of mortaria, differing somewhat
in form from the mortaria found on Roman sites in other parts
of England, and of which a fragment of one is also given in our
278
THE ROMANS.
[chap. viti.
cut ; and of bowls of different shapes and sizes, which are often
painted with stripes of red and yellow. The red Eomano-
Romano- Salopian Ware. — White. Romano- Salopian Ware. — Red.
Salopian ware is also made from one of the clays of the valley
of the Severn, but is of finer texture, and consists principally
of jugs not dissimilar to those in the white ware, except in a
very different form of mouth, one of the simplest examples of
which is represented in our cut, and of bowl-shaped vessels
pierced with a multitude of small lioles, which have no doubt
served the pm'pose of colanders.
Among- the examples of pottery found in exploring Roman
sites, are many others which are totally dissimilar to the ware
made in the great potteries at Upchurch and Castor, and which
were probably derived from other potteries in Britain, the sites
of which have not yet been ascertained. Traces of potteries
have been noticed, I believe, in Lincolnshire and in several
other parts of England, but they have not yet been explored.
Some of the examples alluded to are vt;ry peculiar in character,
and of very rare occurrence. The two fragments represented in
the cut on the next page were found at Richborough ; but I
understand that similar ware has been found in one of the
Roman stations in Wales. They are of a red colour, and are
stamped with the ornament which, in the first example, is
evidently a rude copy of the festoon and tassel pattern of the
Samian ware. The lower one is curious for its resemblance to
the ornamentation of the Frankish pottery, which we shall
CHAP, vm.] OTHER KINDS OF POTTERY.
279
describe furtlier on. Our next cut represents an urn found at
York ; it is of a dusky grey colour, with a very singular orna-
ment in relief, which may be described as a frill pattern, and
which is far from inelegant. Two or three samples of this pot-
Urn from York.
Portcvy from Ricliborough.
tery may be seen in the York museum, ])ut it appears to have
been found nowhere else, and came probably from some manu-
factory in Yorkshire or Lincolnshire.
Other potteries produced vessels of a different character, in-
tended for other purposes than those of which we have been
speaking. Among the most important of these were the
amphorae, or wine vessels. They are of large dimensions, and
strongly made, usually of a reddish yellow colour. There are
two distinct forms of amphorae. Some are long arid slender,
and very elegantly shaped. The two examples on next page,
one of which has lost its neck and handles, were dug up at
Mount Bures, near Colchester. The other form of amphorae
is nnich more spherical in shape, and is therefore more
capacious. These are shorter in the neck than the others.
Both sorts were pointed at the bottom, for the purpose, it is
said, of fixing them in the earth ; one of our examples, however,
has a knob. Numerous fragments of broken amphorae are
gcnierally foimd in the rubbish-pits, mentioned in a former
chapter ; and they occur so abundantly elsewhere, that we can
'im THE ROMANS. [chap. vm.
hardly doubt their being made in the potteries in Britain.
Roman Ampliora-.
Another class of domestic earthenware utensils have been termed
mortaria, because it is supposed that they were used for pound-
iuo- vegetables and other soft articles for the kitchen with a
pestle. They are usually made of yellow, drab, or fawn-coloured
clay, and the surface of the interior is often studded with small
siliceous stones, broken quartz,
and scoria of iron, no doubt to
counteract attrition. The one
here represented is in the pos-
session of Mr Koach Smith, and
was foimd in London. It is
made of clay, kneaded with a
mixture of about one-third of
tile, broken small, and it is
studded with small white siliceous stones. Other examples are
shallower, but the f^-eneral form is the same. The names of the
potters are often marked on tlie amphorae and mortaria, much
A Moiiiinuin.
I
1
CHAP. VIII.] mCHBOIlOUGH TERRA-COTTAS.
281
ill the same way as on tlie Sainian ware. It appears froin the
researches of Mr Artis, that inortaria were made in the Duro-
brivian potteries.
Before we leave the subject of pottery, Ave must not over-
look one class of vessels, which, tliongh of very rare occurrence
ill this country, are of peculiar interest. They are probably of
foreig-n manufacture. They are urns, or jugs, ornamented at
the mouth with heads, usually of females. The two examples
Heads of Roman Jars from Richborough {Rutiqyice).
given in our cut were found at Eichborough. Each is four
inches and a half across, so that they have belonged to large
vessels. They are of brown clay. It has been observed that
they are evidently the prototypes of a class of
earthenware vessels which were popular in the
mi(klle ages. The rubbish-pits of Kichborough
also furnished the museum of Mr Rolfe of Sand-
wich with some broken terra-cotta statuettes,
a class of Homan antiquities which are now ex-
tremely rare. The Kichborough terra-cottas
\ \ l^^\M ^^'<^'i"^ ^y ^^o means of a low style of execution,
\ \ l\\ 1 ^^ works of art, but they were unfortunately all
fragments. A portion of a figure of Venus,
represented in our cut, was perhaps the best ;
in its present state it is four inches high.
These statuettes were probably imported from
Gaul. A manufactory of such articles was
discovered a few years ago near the village of
Heiligenberg, about three miles from Mutzig,
on the Rhine.
Whenever we open Roman sites, we are as-
tonished at the quantities of pottery which lie scattered about,
s
Terra-Cotta
from
Richborough.
282 THE EOMAXS. [chap. viii.
and we feel convinced that this article must have formed a larg'e
proportion of the furniture of a Roman house. It was used,
indeed, for a mucli <iTeater variety of purposes than at the pre-
sent day, and we find many proofs that earthenware vases were
continually employed as the receptacles of money and of a
variety of little articles, which we should lay up in chests and
boxes, or in baskets, bags, caskets, or work-boxes.
There was another manufacture in which the Romans attained
to great excellence, that of glass, and we are struck not only
Avitli the extraordinary beauty, but with the endless variety of
the samples that are continually found on Roman sites. All
our readers will be familiar with the old story of the accidental
discovery of glass-making by the merchants who lit their fires
upon the sands of the river Belus on the coast of Syria. Pliny
gives a brief account of the manufacture of glass in his time,
from which we gather that the great glass furnaces were gener-
ally established on the sea-coast, where a fine sand was found
adapted to the purpose. In these manufactories the glass was
made in lumps, in which form it was distributed to the work-
shops of the workers in glass, who melted the lumps as they
wanted them, and it was then coloured and formed into bottles,
vessels, and other articles, sometimes by blowing, at other
times by grinding on awheel or lathe, and at others by emboss-
ing or casting in a mould.* Pliny goes on to tell us that the
working of glass was carried to such a perfection in Rome that
the emperor Tiberius put a stop to it, lest the precious metals
should be thrown into discredit. Sidon was the site of tlie
great glass-works of antiquity, but the most celebrated estab-
lishment of the Romans was that situated on the coast between
Cumse and Lucrinum. In the time of Pliny, glass manufac-
tories had been established on the coasts of Spain and Gaul.f
I have always believed, from the quantity of Roman glass
that is found in this island, that we should some day trace
the existence of Roman glass manufactoiies in Britain, and
it is naturally to the coast that we must look for them. But
I was not aware that anything of the sort had yet been ob-
served, until I was informed by my friend, Augustus Guest,
Esq., LL.D., of a very curious discovery he had made on the
* Continuis fornacibus ut jbs liqnatur, niassseque fiunt colore pingui
nigricantes. Ex iiiassis rursus fuuditur in officinis, tingiturque, et aliud
flatu figuratur, aliud torno teritur, aliud argenti inodo ccelatur. — Plin.
Hist. Nat., lib. XXX vi c. 26.
t Jaui vero et per Gallias Hispaniasque simili niodo arenas temperantur.
CKAP. VIII.] THE GLASS MANUFACTURE.
283
coast at Eri^liton, tlic sand of wliich I am told is extremely
well calculated for the manufacture of this article. Dr Guest
told me that in 1848, as he was searcliing along the shore for
specimens of agates, he picked up, on that portion of it ex-
tending from opposite Kemptown towards Rotting or Rotten
Dean, several pieces of what, in consequence of the attrition to
which it had been subjected, appeared, on placing them before
a strong light, to be coloured pebbles ; but on taking them
to an intelligent lapidary in the town, he at once recognised
them as pieces of glass, of which, after a lieavy sea, he occa-
sionally found considerable quantities. He produced several
large pieces, the colours of which were amethyst, amber,
emerald green, and deep maroon, the latter colour being the
rarest. The lapidary was accustomed to cut and polish small
sections of the glass, and to apply them to ornamental pur-
poses, as brooches, &c. The largest piece shown to Dr Guest
was about double the size of a man's fist; it was of an amber
colour, and much encrusted by marine insects. A large portion
of the cliff on this spot has evidently given way under the
action of the sea, which has here encroached considerably on
the land, and it is not improbable that one of the slips common
in the chalk formation has at some distant period carried away
v,'ith it the remains of one of the Romano-British glass manu-
factories. The fragments cast upon the shore are no doubt
parts of the lumps (massce) of the material which were sent
awav hence to the glass-workers in the greater towns throuo'h
the island. Pliny seems to intimate that the mass of glass thus
sent out was colourless, and that it was coloured by the glass-
workers, but it seems here to have been made in coloured
masses, to be still more ready for use.
From the brittle character of the material, glass vessels are
found in a perfect state much more seldom than pottery ;
Koman Glass Vessels,
indeed, perfect specimens are rarely found, except in sepulchral
284
THE ROMAXS.
[chap. VIII.
interments, where tlit^y have been intentionally protected. The
shapes and uses of vessels of o-lass were evidently very numer-
ous, and one or two only of the forms more worthy of notice
are given in the accompanying cut. The two vessels to the
left are -those usually found, with calcined bones, in Eoman
sepulchres, . They are generally of green glass. The three
smaller ones to the right are also frequently found in sepulchres,
and are usually termed lachrymatories, from the somewhat
romantic notion that they were filled with the tears of the
mourners; the received opinion among antiquaries at the pre-
sent day, is that they contained the unguents and aromatics
which it was usual to depose with the dead. The jug in the
middle exhibits one of the simpler forms of the embossed orna-
ments on the moulded glass. Some of these are elaborate and
beautiful, and woidd present difficulties even to the modern
glass-makers. This is said to be especially the case with a
class of round cups or bowls, which are by no means uncommon
in green, blue, and mixed colours, and which are ornamented
with projecting pillars. This pillar-moulding was considered
to be one of the great inventions in modern glass-making, and
it was not supposed among glass-workers that it was a mere
revival of an ornament common among the Romans. The cups
alluded to are nearly all of the same form, and would be
described now as sugar-basins, though they were probably
Part of a Roman Glass Bowl or Cup.
drinking cups. The annexed cut represents a fragment of one
of th^se cups, given by Mr Roach Smith from the excavations
at Richborough ; it is here engraved the full size of the original.
In some instances the embossed ornaments were much more
•elaborate, and, as on the ornamental pottery, it extended to
CHAP, viii.] EMBOSSED AND FIGURED GLASS.
285
fig-ures and to inscriptions. This figured glass ware is, how-
ever, rare, and was no doubt precious. Mr Eoacli Sniitli has
pubHslied in Ids ' Collectanea ' a fragment of a very remark-
able cup in green glass, found in tlie Roman villa at Hartlip in
Roman embossed Glass Cup, from Hartlip, Kent
Kent. It is here given, from his book, about half the actual
size, the thin lines indicatmg the form of the vessel whei'
entire. The subjects represented upon it are chariot racing
and gladiatorial combats, with the names of the charioteers
and combatants. The figures are in the original somewhat
indistinct, and the letters so faint, that it is questionable if
tliey are all given correctly. Mr Smith possessed, in his
museum, two simihir fragments, found in London, one of which
is identical with the Hartlip fragment in its design, and appears
to be from the same mould ; the other is from a vessel of a
different shape, and has a quadriga in bas-relief. We have
before had occasion to observe how popular gladiatorial subjects
and the gam(;s of the circus were among the Roman inhabitants
of this island, and how often we find them represented on the
pottery as well as on the glass. In the Hartlip glass the
charioteer has just reached the goal, which is marked by three
conical columns of Avood raised upon a base. This was the
asual form of the vietcs, and it is said to have been assumed as
the imitation of the form of a cypress tree : —
' Metasque imitata cupi'essus,'
286 THE ROMANS. [chap. viii.
says Ovid (Metnmorph. lib. x. 1. 106). The names here given
to the charioteers and coinl)atants are probably mei'e conven-
tional appellations. A series of gladiatorial snbjects are sculp-
tnred on one of the tombs of Pompeii, with names attached to
them in a similar manner, although in this instance they appear
to have beim the real names of the individuals represented.
The charioteer is here driving the biga ; in the other example
of embossed glass in the possession of Mr lloach Smith, he
rides, as we have stated, the quadriga. It no doubt formed
j^art of a scene from the cii'cus. Embossed glass vessels of this
description are of the utmost rarity, and I am not aware of the
existence of any other examples in this country.
Drinking-cups, with inscriptions, are found not unfrequently.
It was a trait of Eoman sentiment, both on the continent and
in Britain, to accompany familiar or domestic occupations with
invocations of happiness or good fortune upon those who took
part in them, and this seems to have been especially the case in
their convivial entertainments. Cups have been found with
such inscriptions as bibe feliciter (drink with good luck !),
or BiBE VT VIVAS (drink that you may live !), or again, vivas
BiBERE (may you live to drink!). An analogous drinking
formula was preserved in the middle ages, in the Anglo-Saxon
7vcds heel (be thou in health !). Mr lloach Smith, in his
' Collectanea,' has given samples of cups in red pottery with
inscriptions in white letters, such as ave (hail !), vivas (may
you live!), bibe (drink), imple (fill). In excavations on the
site of the Roman villa at Ickleton, in Essex, Lord Braybrooke
found a fragment of a drinking-cup of fine earthenware, with
an inscription, inscribed with a stilus, or some sharp instru-
ment, of which there remained the letters camicibibvn, no
doubt part of the words ex hoc amlci blbunt (out of this cup
friends drink). Among fragments picked up in a Eoman, and
subsequent Saxon, cemetery, near Holme Pierrepoint, in Not-
tinghamshire, was part of a small cup of thin yellow glass, with
a portion of a raised inscription (of which the word semper
only remained), above the figure of a bird. Tiie figures in this
and most similar articles are rather rude, but there are speci-
mens in which the execution shows not only a high feeling of
art, but also an extraordinary skill in manipulation on the part
of the workman. The cut annexed represents the base of a
handle to a vase, of fine blue glass, representing the head of a
female, in very high relief. It was dug up in Leadenhall-
street, in London, and is now in the collection of Lord Lou-
I
CHAP. VIII.]
GLASS BEADS.
287
desborough. Mr lloacti Smith possessed a similar fragment
in green glass, but of still finer execution, also found in
London.
The skill of the Roman glass-workers, in the manipulation
of their art, is shown still more
remarkably in the manner in which
they fused into each other pieces of
glass of different colours, so as to form
the most elegant and tasteful patterns.
This art was displayed especially in
the manufacture of glass beads, which
are found in considerable quantities
on Roman sites in this country.
They present so many varieties in
form and colour, that it would be
impossible here to give any descrip-
tion that could include them all ;
yet there are a certain number of
types which occur more frequently
than others, and I will give a
f(nv of these which have sometimes been misappropriated.
The large bead to the left in the accompanying group is
one of common occurrence, and it and some other Roman
beads of different forms have been fancifully and very erro-
neously termed druids' beads. They are sometimes found
of a large size, twice or even thrice the size of the one in
Embossed Glass.
Roman Glass Beads.
our cut. The most common forms of Roman glass beads are
slight variations of the upper figure to the right, which are
288
THE ROMANS.
[chap. viri.
executed in g'lass of different colours, tliougli most commonly
blue, sometimes very lig'lit, at others of a deep shade, and
sometimes of a material that has been only imperfectly vitrified.
The other bead, in which a serpentine ornament is infused
into the glass, was found among the ruins of Cilurnum in
Northumberland. In many of these beads of compound colours,
the shades are exquisitely blended together. Our second cut
represents a bead and a button, both of glass, found at Eich-
borough. The bead is of blue glass, with white enamel ; tlie body
Roman Glass Bead and Button.
of the button is dark blue, Avith the central dot red, and the
other four light blue. Mr Smith informs us that a considerable
number of such buttons, but chiefly in plain white and blue
glass, have been found with sepulchral remains on the site of a
Roman burial-ground near Boulogne.
Extensive traces of the manufacture of personal ornaments
from another material have been discovered in Britain. This
material was what the Romans seem to have designated by the
name o^ gagates, or jet, and Avhich is now popularl\ called in the
different localities where it is found. Kennel coal and Kim-
meridge coal. In our own time Kennel coal has been exten-
sively used in the manufacture of ornamental vases, turned on the
lathe, and other such articles. The articles in jet of the Romans
in Britain were also made on the lathe, and consisted chiefly of
rings, armlets, beads, buttons, and similar ornaments, and, as
I have just said, the traces of the manufactories in one district
have been discovered. In the wildest and least frequented
part of the isle of Purbeck, on the coast of Dorset, are two
small secluded valleys, opening to the sea into what are termed
the Kimmeridge and Worthbarrow bays, and divided by an
intervening ridge of consideraole elevation. The soil of these
valleys, laid out from time immemorinl in uninclosed pastures,
has never been disturbed by the Dlough share, and when for any
accidental purpose it is dug, at a tew inches under the surface
are fouml great numbers of small, round, and flat pieces of
a mineral substance, found in extensive beds on this part of the
coast, and known by the name of Kimmeridge coal. It is a
CHAP. VIII.] KIMMERIDGE COAL. 280
bituminous shale, wliich burns freely, with a white ash and
slaty residue, ditt'iising" a disagreeable bituminous odoiu*, in this
respect answering to Pliny's description of the gagates. The
round pieces found in such abundance in these localities are
generally from a quarter to half an inch thick, and from an
inch and a quarter to two inches and a half in diameter,
with bevelled and moulded edges, and having on one side two,
three, or four round holes, and on the other side a small pivot
hole. In a few instances these round holes are absent, and the
pieces are wholly perforated with a single central square hole.
A single glance at these articles is sufficient to convince any
one acquainted with the use of the lathe, that they are simply
the refuse pieces of the turner, the nuclei of rings and otlier
articles formed by his art. The round holes were evidently
made to attach the piece of material on the point of the chuck ;
and the square one was for fixing it on a small square mandril-
head ; circumstances, it has been observed, which prove that
the people who made these articles were well accustomed to the
use of the lathe, not in its primitive rude form, but as an im-
proved and, in some degree, perfected instrument. Much
irregularity is obsei-vable in the number of the holes. The
greater number hitherto found have two holes ; while pieces
with four holes are rare, and generally of a small size. Frag-
ments of the raw material are frequently found mixed with
these round pieces. Some of these show the marks of cutting-
tools, as if prepared for the lathe, whilst the shale, being fresh
from the quarry, was comparatively soft. Others exhibit lines,
angles, circles, and other tigures, drawn with mathematical
accuracy, the central point, in which one leg of the compasses
was inserted, being often visible. Pieces of rings of the same
material, and sometimes a perfect ring, are also found scattered
about ; so that we cannot have the least doubt that here existed
once an extensive manufactory of this material. Fragments of
Roman pottery, mixed here and there with these remains, fix
the date to which they belong. Yet, with all these facts before
them, our antiquaries of the old school have remained blind to
their real character, and it was gravely conjectured, and even
asserted, that these refuse pieces from the Roman lathe had
been manufactured to serve the purposes of money by Pha>-
nician traders, who c.une in the remote ages of the world to
trade with the primeval Celts.*
* The real character of these remains was, I believe, first pointed out hy
the late Mi Sydenham, a gentleman known to antiquaries by his contribu-
290 THE ROMANS. [chap. viii.
Articles of this material seem to have had a peculiar value
from the circumstance that it was supposed, as Ave are told by
Pliny, to possess the virtue of driving- aAvay serpents. Probably
future discoveries will bring to light similar manufactories in
other parts of the island, and it is not unlikely that they con-
tinued to exist through the earlier Anglo-Saxon period. Bede
describes i\\e gagates as being in his time an important produc-
tion of Britain, and he speaks of its quality, when burnt, of
driving away serpents, and tells us how, when warmed with
rubbing, it has the same attractive quality as amber.* In'
interments, chiefly of the Eomnn period, and on Roman sites,
rings, and other articles, of the Kimmeridge and Kennel coal
liave been found.
The Romans were more attentive to the utility of the mineral
productions of our island than we are accustomed to suppose.
There cannot be a doubt that they knew the use of mineral
coals, and that they employed them, but they ordy obtained
them where the coal-bed was near the surface, and the coal was
probably burnt chiefly in the district where it was found.
Mineral coal has been supposed to be referred to by Solinus,
when he tells us that Minerva was the patron of the warm
springs in Britain, alluding apparently to Bath, and that th<^
fire that burnt on her altars did not fall into white ashes, but
as the fire wasted away it turned into stony globules. f A
more unequivocal proof of the use of this fuel is, however,
furnished by the fact that the cinders of mineral coal have been
not unfrequently found in the fire-places of Roman houses and
villas in diftereut parts of the island. It is found abundantly
among the fire-places of the hypocausts of the buildings of
Roman Uriconium, at Wroxeter. Mr Bruce assures us that
in nearly all the stations on the line of the wall of Hadrian,
' the ashes of mineral fuel have been found ; in some, a store
tions to the Archaeologia on Dorsetshire barrows. The notion of their being
made by Phoenician merchants, to represent money, and of t eir being-
used also in the religious worship of the natives of Britain, was set forth,
among others, by Mr Miles, in an appendix to the account of the Deverill
barrow.
* Gignit et lapidem gagatem plurimum optimumque; est autem nigro-
gemmeus et ardens igni admotus ; incensus serpentes fugat, attritu cale-
ifactus applicita detinet aique ut succinum. — Bede, Hist. Eccl. lib. i, c. 1.
It niust be stated that Bede's account is taken almost literally from
Solinus.
f Quibus fontibus praesul est Minervse numen, in cujus aede perpetui
ignes nunquam canescunt in favillas, sed ubi ignis tabuit, vertit in globo8
saxeos. — Holini Fohjhist., c. 22.
1
CHAP. VIII.] METALS OF BRITAIN. 291
of un consumed coal has been met with, which, thonj^h intended
to g'ive warmth to the primeval occupants of the isthnms, has
been burnt in the g^i-ates of the modern Eng-lish. In several
places the source whence the mineral was procured can be
pointed out ; but the most extensive workino;s that I have heard
of are in the neig-hbourhood of Grindon Lough, near Sewing-
sliields. Not long ago a shaft was sunk, with the view of
procuring the coal which was supposed to be below the surface ;
the projector soon found that, though coal had been there, it
was all removed. The ancient workings stretched beneath the
bed of the lake.'
The metals of Britain formed, we know, the great proportion
of its exports, under the Roman occupation. They consisted
chiefly of iron, lead, tin, and copper. Round pigs of the last-
mentioned metal, belonging to the Roman period, have been
found in Wales, whence, and from Cornwall, the Romans derived
their chief supply. One of these, still preserved at Mostyn
Hall, in the county of Flint, bears the inscription socio romae,
which has not been satisfactorily explained. Iron was obtained
by the Romans in vast quantities from various parts of the
island, though the principal Roman iron-works were in the
wooded district of the country of the Silures, now called the
Porest of Dean, and in the extensive forest of Anderida, forming
the modern weald of Sussex and Kent. Traces of the Roman
occupation are found abimdantly in both these districts. In
various places in Sussex, as in the parishes of Maresfield, Sedles-
combe, and Westfield, immense masses of ancient iron scoriae,
or slag, are found. At Oaklands, in Sedlescombe, there is a
mass of very considerable extent, w hich, on being cut into for
materials for road-making, was ascertained to be not less than
twenty feet deep. The period to which they belong is proved,
by the frequent discovery of Roman coins and pottery inter-
mixed with the cinders. At Maresfield, especially, the frag-
ments of Roman pottery and other articles are so abundant,
that, as we are informed by Mr M. A. Lower, of Lewes, who
first laid these facts before tlie ])ublic, when one of these cin-
der-beds was removed, scarcely a barrow-load of cinders could
be examined without exhibiting several fragments. The mate-
rial for the Roman furnaces was the clay ironstone, from the
beds between the chalk and oolite of this district, which is
found in nodular concretions, consisting often of an outer shell
of iron ore, with a nucleus of sand. These are found near the
surface of the ground, and the liomans dug small pits from
V
-I
292 THE ROMAXS. [chap. vri.
wliicli they extracted these nodules, and cavried them to the
furnaces, Avhich stood in the immediate vicinity. These p.'ts
are still found in considerable groups, covered almost always
with a thick wood, and the discovery of pottery, &c., leaves ns
no room to doubt that they are Roman works. Large as the
Sussex works seem to have been, those in the Forest of Dean,
and more especially along the banks of the Wye, appear to
have been much more extensive. Hei'e the ground for miles
rests upon one immense continuous bed of iron cinders, the
antiquity of which is proved by the occasional discovery of
lloman coins and other remains, with unmistakeable traces of
Roman settlements. The ore is here of a much richer descrip-
tion, and lies in veins at no great depth under the ground.
The Romans sank a large pit until they came to the vein of
metal, vvliich they then followed in its course, and thus exca-
vated caverns and chambers under-ground, extending often to
some hun(h"ed feet. In the neighbourhood of Coleford these
ancient excavations are called Scowles — a term of which tlie
derivation is not very evident. They are often looked upon
with a superstitious feeling, and have received names from it.
Thus, in a hill on the banks of the Wye, called the Great
Doward, is an extensive Roman iron mine, popidarly called
' King Arthur's Hall,' at the bottom of which tradition says a
chest of treasure is concealed. In this district the river Wye
formed a convenient medium of transport, and either the pure
ore, or the iron in its first rough state, was carried up the
Severn as high at least as the present city of Worcestei",
where large beds of iron scorise with Roman remains have
been discovered. AVe have already quoted a tradition which
describes the Roman Alauna {Alceder, in Warwickshire)
as a town of iron-workers. Traces of Roman iron-works are
met with in various other parts of Britain. Large beds of
cinders, or, as they are technically termed, slag, mixed with
Roman remains, have been found in Northinnberland and, I
understand, in Yorksliire.
The process of smelting among the Romans appears to have
been simple and imperfect. The fuel used was charcoal, pieces
of which are often found impressed in the cinders. It is sup-
posed that layers of iron ore, broken up, and charcoal, mixed
Avith lime-stone as a flux, were piled together, and inclosed in
a wall and covering of clay, with holes at the bottom for letting
in the draught, and allowing the melted metal to run out. For
this purpose they were usually placed on sloping ground.
CHAP. VIII.] TROCESS OF SMELTING IRON. 293
Kude bellows wore perhaps used, worked by dififerent con-
trivances.* In Sussex, and in the Forest of Dean, tliey appear
to have been worked by means of water, at least in some of the
streams in those districts remains of ancient tanks are founrl,
which are supposed to have been made to collect the water for
that purpose. Mr Bruce, in his account of the ' Roman Wall,'
lias pointed out a very curious contrivance for producing- a
blast in the furnaces of the extensive Roman iron-works in
the neig-hbourhood of Epiacum {Lanclteder). A part of the
valley, rendered barren by the heaps of slightly covered cinders,
had never been cultivated till very recent times. ' During- the
operation of bringing this common into cultivation,' Mr Bruce
says, ' the method adopted by the Romans of producing the
blast necessary to sm(;lt the metal was made apparent. Two
tunnels had been formed in the side of a lull ; they were wide
at one extremity, but tapered oft" to a narrow bore at the other,
where they met in a point. The mouths of the channels open-
ed towards the west, from which quarter a prevalent wind
blows in this valley, and sometimes Avith great violence. The
blast received by them would, when the wind was high, be
poured with considerable force and eftect upon the smelting
furnaces at the extremity of the tunnels.'
Any one who takes one of these ancient cinders in his hand,
will be at once convinced by its weight how imperfect had been
the process of smelting, and how much metal still remains in
* This primitive mode of smelting is still in use amono- some peoples
imacquainted with the improvements of civilized nations. We are told by
the early Spanish writers, that the Peruvians built their furnaces for
smeltinji- silver on eminences where the air was freest ; they were perforated
on all sides with holes, throug-h which the air was driven when the wind,
blew, which was the only time when the work could be carried on, and
under each hole was made a projection of the stonework, on which was laid
burning coals to heat the air before it entered the furnace.
The smelting furnaces fur iron in the Himmaleh mountains of Central
Asia are described as follows ; — A chinmey is built of clay, about four feet
and a half high, by fifteen to eighteen inches in diameter, upon a stage of
stonework, over a fire-place. In an opening below the stage there is a hole,
through which the metal when melted flows, and this is stopped with clay
or earth, easily removed with an iron poker. The fire is blown with two
pair of bellows, each made of a goat's skin, and worked by a woman or
boy. The iron ore was mixed with pounded charcoal, and thrown into
the chimney. A somewhat similar tower of clay was made for smelting
by an African people, visited by Mungo Park, but they trusted partly to
the wind for a blast, and placed the iron ore, after it had been broken into
pieces of the size of a hen's ^^^^^ in alternate layers with charcoal. See
further on this subject, Scrivener's ' Comprehensive History of the Iron
Trade.'
294
THE ROMAXS.
[chap. VIII.
it. During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries the Eoraan
iron scoriae in the Porest of Dean and in Worcestershire, were
re-smelted on a very extensive scale; and it is said that, being-
gathered with so little trouble, they were actually found more
profitable than fresh ore which had to be dug from a consider-
able depth in the ground. Besides the marks of charcoal still
visible on some of the cinders, examples occur which show the
effects of the irregular heat produced by this fuel. One,
which I picked up among a vast heap of cinders at Sedlescombe,
in Sussex, proved by coins found in it to be Eoman, exhibits a
curious appearance of a compact mass with veins and drusy
cavities with crystalline iron ; in this instance an imperfect steel
or carburet of iron has been the result of the excessive heat
produced by the wood fuel.
Among the other principal metallic productions of om- island,
worked by the Romans, were lead and tin, called by the
Romans, plumbum nigrnm and plumbum album. The latter we
know was, under its Greek name of casslteros, the chief and
most valuable production of the Brittanic Isles at a very remote
period, and procured for them the name of the Cassiterides, or
Tin Islands. We are told by ancient writers that lead was
found so plentifully, and so near the surface of the ground, that
it was found necessary in the earlier period of the Roman occu-
pation to make a law limiting the quantity to be taken each
year.* The tin districts were, as at present, Cornwall and
Wales, and I believe that Roman mines have been traced, and
that blocks of Roman tin have been found, though they are of
extreme rarity. This, however, is not the case with lead ; for
I VL PMG5
Eoiuan Pig of Lead, from Hauipshii-e.
the traces of Roman lead mines are very numerous, and pigs of
lead, with the official stamps of the Roman miners, are by no
means of uncommon occurrence. This stamp usually consisted
* Tn Britannia summo terrje corio adeo large, ut lex ultro dicatur, ne
plus carlo modo fiat. — I'lin. Mist. Nat.^ lib. xxxv. c. 17.
CHAP. VIII. J THE LEAD MANUFACTURE. 205
of an inscription J^ivinoj the name of the emperor under whose
reig-ii the lead had been produced from the furnace. The fore-
g'oing cut represents one of these pigs of lead, found in 1783,
on the verge of Brougliton brook, near Stockbridge, in Hamp-
shire. It will serve to give a general idea of the form and clia-
racter of these articles, and it has a certain historical interest from
the circumstance that it was made the year before the insurrec-
tion of Boadicea. The main inscription is, nekonis avg. ex
KiAN nil cos BRIT. On one side are the letters hvl pmcos;
on the other, ex atigent and capascas, with tlie numeral
XXX.* Other examples found at different times have presented
the following inscriptions : —
1. TI CLAVDIVS CAESAR AYG P M TRIE P YIII IMP XVI DE BRIT AN
2. IMP DOMIT AVG GER DE CEANG
3. CAESARI VADOM
4. IMP CAES DOMITIAN AVG COS VII PRIG
5. IMP VESP VII T IMP V COS DE CEANG
6. TI CL TR LVT BR EX ARG
7. IMP CAES HADRIANI AVG MET LVT
8. IMP HADRIANI AVG
9. IMP DVOR AVG ANTONINI ET VERI ARMENIACORVM
10. L ARVCONI VERECVND METAL LVTVD
11. C IVL PROTI BRIT LVT EX ARG
The greater number of these inscriptions, it will be seen at once,
commemorate the emperor in whose reign each was made. The
two last, no doubt, give us the names of private individuals,
eitlier governors of the province, or persons appointed to super-
intend the mines of Britciin. Some of the words of these inscrip-
tions have provoked rather long disquisitions, yet they are capable
of a simple explanation, lvt is supposed to be an abbreviation
of latum, washed, in reference to the process through which the
metal (met) had passed ; and the ex aug, or ex argent, is
explained by a passage of Pliny, who informs us that lead was
found under two different forms, either in veins by itself, or
mixed with silver. f The latter had to go tiirough a more coni-
* Mr Roacli Smith observes on this inscription : — ' As Nero never
assumed the title of Britannicus, and as the numerals precede the cos, I
suspect the insci'iption should be read —
(Plumbum or Metallum) Neronis Aug. cos. iiii., Ex. Kian. Brit.
The P.M. Cos may belong to the above, and the rest be the name of some
superintendent.'
f Plumbi nigri origo duplex est ; aut enim sua provenit vena, nee quic-
quaiii ahud ex se parit ; aut cum argento nascitur, mistisque venis con-
tlutur.— P/j«. Hist. Nat., lib. xxxiv. c. 16.
296 THE ROMANS. CcHAr. viii.
plicated process of extraction, which is referred to bv tlie words
of the inscription, hitnm ex arcjento, and which it seems the
lioniano-British metallurgMst considered it necessary to specify.
Tlie exaniph's on which the words bhig and de ceang occnr,
were fonnd cliiefiy in Cheshire and Yorkshire, and tliese words
are supposed to signify that they came from the tribe of the
Ceang'i, or Cangi, and the Brigantes. Tlie words ex kian on
the pig of lead, represented in our cut, are supposed to refer to
the same tribe of the Ceaugi, by an earlier mode of spelling the
name. It had no doubt been left in Hampshii-e on its way to
the coast for exportation.
It is indeed difficult in many cases to form any opinion re-
lating to these relics from the place where they were found.
Three of them were found near Matlock, in Derbyshire, no
doubt in the neighbourhood of the mines from which they WTre
taken. They have been found also in Shropshire, near tlie site
of ancient lead mines. The inscriptions are curious, as belonging
mostly to the earlier emperors, and show-ing that the metallic
riches of Britain were among its first resources turned to account
by the Eoinan conquerors.*
The wording of some of the above inscriptions is sufficient
evidence that the Romans obtained silver from the mines in
Britain, and the island province appears also to have furnished
gold, though probably in \'£\"^ small quantities. Gold has been
traced in the quartz formation near Lampeter, in Wales, in the
immediate neighbourhood of a Roman settlement, where enor-
mous mounds of broken and pounded quartz remain as memo-
rials of the Roman gold diggers. A still more curious memorial,
perhaps, of the British silver mines was discovered in the latter
part of the last century, among remains of very old masonry
cleared away in digging the foundations of the then new office
for the Board of Ordnance, in the Tower of London. It had
apparently been a square ingot of silver, about thi-ee-eighths of an
inch thick, but it had subsequently been beaten at each end
with a hammer, till the whole had assumed the form of a double
wedge. From its weight, when found, there could be little
doubt of its having been originally a Roman pound of silver.
* For further information on these pie;.s of lead and on the Roman
mining- operations in this island in g-eneral. the reader is referred to very
excellent papers by Professor Phillips and Mr Albert Way, in a recent
volume of the ' Archaeological Journal,' and by Mr James Yate.s, in the
eighth volume of the ' Proceedings of the Somer.ietshire Archicoiogic al
and Natural History Society.'
CHAP, viii.] BRONZE. 297
In the middle, on one side, within a simple square label, ^vas
the inscription: —
EX OFII
HONOR]
in which the last letters of each line had been partly effaced,
probably by a blow of the hammer. It seems doubtful if the
Honorius here commemorated was an officer of the Komau
mint in Britain, or the emperor of that name ; though the pro-
bability seems to be turned in favour of the latter by the dis-
covery close by it of three gold coins, one of which was of tlie
emperor Honorius, while the two others belonged to his partner
in the empire, Arcadius.* In this case, it would belong to the
closing period of the Roman rule in Britain.
The metal most in ftwour among the Eomans for the manu-
facture of useful and ornamental articles, appears to have been
bronze. It would extend beyond our limits, and be of no real
practical utility, to give a description of the almost endless
variety of articles of bronze belonging to the Eoman period,
which have been found in this country, some of very rude work-
manship, and others showing a very high state of art. It is not
possible to say how many of the articles were made in Britain,
and how many were imported, but there can, I think, be little
doubt that such articles were manufactured here in considerable
quantities. As the rough, unformed glass was distributed from
the manufactory to the small glass-workers, so the bronze was
probably sold in lumps to small manufacturers, who, either
with the hand, or more frequently by melting it into moulds,
formed statuettes, vessels of various kinds, ornaments, tools,
and toys, under Avhich latter head I suspect we ought to place a
large number of the small^ rude figures of animals, &c., in bronze,
which are frequently found on Eoman sites. I believe that the
fragments of old bronze with chisels and other implements of
the same metal, already described (p. 98), as found in different
parts of England, belonged to the Eoman workers in bronze.
Smelting pots, with remains of molten bronze, and lumps of the
same metal, and even entire foundries, with moulds and the
articles cast in them, have been found in different parts of
Germany, as at Demmin, in Mecklenburgh ; Gross Jena, in
Thuringen ; Braunfels, in Hessen ; and at Zurich, in Switzer-
land; and, I believe, in Trance; and if I am not mistaken,
* This infj^ot of silver and the three coins are engraved in the fifth
volume of the ' Archaeologia ' of the Society of Antiquaries.
T
29S THE ROMANS. [chap, viii,
they will he found to have been all discovered in localities occu-
pied by the Roinaus.
That Rouiau art did flourish to a certain dep;ree in Britain,
we have proofs in the various traces of oi'naniental decoration
in the houses, in articles of bronze and other material, and in
the remains of statuary. Some few frag'ineuts of wall-painting-s
that have been rescued from the general destruction of the
frescoes of the Roman houses, are artistically executed ; and,
although many of the sepulchral and other sculptures found in
our ishuid are of a rude character, others are quite the contrary.
It is probable that most of the finer pieces of sculpture in
marble, found in the Roman villas and elsewhere, were executed
abroad ; but other similar remains of great beauty have been
found sculptured in materials which were imdoubtedly obtained
in the island, and generally near the spot where they seem to
have been erected. Such were the statues, which exhibit a
very high degree of art, found by Mr Artis in 1844, 1845, and
1 846, near Sibson, in Bedfordshire, and at a place between
Wansford and King's Clift", in the same county, known as Bed-
I'oi'd Pnrliens, which were formed of the oolite of the district,
popularly known as Barnack rag. They are now preserved in
the collection of the Duke of Bedford, and include large portions
of figures of Hercules, Apollo, and Minerva Gustos. At Birrens,
in Scotland, was found a dedicatory inscription, by Julius
Cerealis Censorinus, who is described as the image-maker {s'kjU-
larlirs), or fabricator of the statues of the gods, to the college
of Ugniferl ; and the mutilated trunk of a colossal statue of
jMercury, found at the same spot, was supposed to be a relic of
his works.
Of the other professions of the Romans in Britain, we find,
from their very nature, fewxr traces among existing remains,
1 hough one or two of them are commemorated in inscriptions,
'i'hus, a votive statue to the goddess Brigantia, found at Birrens
in Scotland, was dedicated, if not made, by Amandus the archi-
tect. A monumental stone, found at Housesteads in North-
nnd)erland, commemorates a young medical practitioner, Anicius
Ingeniuis, physician in ordinary to the first cohort of the Tun-
grians.*
There is, however, a class of monuments relating to the
Roman medical profession and their practice in Britain, which
are so cmious, that they require a more minute description and
* D M ANICIO IXGENVO MEDICO OUDI COH PRIMAE TVXGR VIX AN XX.V.
CHAP, viii.] THE ]\rEPICAL I'KuFESSIOX.
!99
■explanation. These are the stamps used for impressing- the
names of tlie makers and the purposes of certain medicinal pre-
parations.
Numerous examples of tliese medicine stamps have heen
found in Germany, France, and Italy, as well as in Britain ;
and in the former countries they have been the subject of several
learned treatises.* They are usually made of a g'reenish schist,
or steatite, and consist of a small thin square block, generally
with an inscription on each of the four edg*es. In a few in-
stances the stone is of an oblong* form, and has only two in-
scribed sides. The inscriptions are inverse and retrograde, and
they were evidently intended as stamps; but when first noticed,
they were a great puzzle to the antiquary. The example given
in our cut, which was found a few years ago at Kenchester in
Herefordshire {Magna), belongs to the former of these two
classes. The inscription usually expresses the name of the
Roman Medicine Stamp from Kenchester [Magna.)
maker of the medicine, that of the medicine itself, and the
disease for which it was intended as a specific. From the
phices in which they are found, the name appears to be gener-
ally that of a medical practitioner iu oue of the principal towns,
who composed the medicines, and, perhaps, sold them in pack-
ages to the minor practitioners or dealers in the smaller towns
and in the country, in the manner that patent medicines used
to be sold in England. It is somewhat remarkable, that in all
the examples yet found, amounting in number to at least sixty,
the diseases are uniformly those of the eyes, and hence they are
* Two French writers especially have written at length on this subject :
M. Sichel, in a tract entitled Cinq Cachets inedits ch MMecins-Oculistes
Romains (Paris, 1&45), and M. Duchalais, Observations sur les Cachets
des Mddecins-OcHlistes aticiens, d-propos de cinq Fierres sigillaires
inedites (Paris, 1846). Still more recently an interesting paper on the
Koman medicine stamps found in Britain has been contributed to the
' Monthly Journal of Medical Science,' by Professor Simpson, of Edin-
burgh, but a part only of which has, as far as I can learn, been yet printed.
300 THE ROMANS. [chap. vnr.
supposed to have been only used by pliysieians who treated
that very numerous class of diseases, and some writers have
spoken of them by the name of oculists' stamps.*
Any one who will turn to the index to an ordinary edition
of Pliny's Natural History, will see at one glance how much
attention the Romans gave to diseases of the eyes, which appear
to have been extraordinarily prevalent, not only in Italy, but
throughout the western provinces. This is probably to be at-
tributed to some circumstance connected with the diet or way
of living of the ancients. The Greek medical writers enumerate
more than two hundred diseases of the eyes, for which an im-
mense number of different ointments, or collyria, were invented.
The reader will remember the lines of Horace —
' Hie oculis ego nigra meis collyria lippus
Illinerc'
These collyria were composed of a great number of ingredients,
and were many of them celebrated among all physicians by
their particular names. These were sometimes taken from
those of the original inventors, as the coUyrium of Dionysius,
and the collyrium of Sergius. A more numerous class received
their names from the characteristic of the mixture or from some
particular ingredient. Thus we have the collyrium chloro^'^
named from its green colour ; the cirrlion, from its yellow tint ;
the evodes (ehujdec), from its pleasant smell; the cnicetum
{hviKr]Tov, invincible), because pretended to be superior to all
the others ; the crocodes, made of crocus or saffron ; the na?'-
dlmmi, containing spikenard ; the dlasmyi'ties, containing myrrh ;
the dlarrhodori, containing roses; and so on. The example
given above, which was found at Kenchester, had belonged to
a physician named apparently Titus Vindacius Ariovistus, who,
to judge from his name, appears to have been of German race.
On the upper surface is the word senior, the first three letters
of which are repeated on tlie low^er surface, and it has been sug-
gested that it was probaldy the name of a subsequent possessor.
The four inscriptions of the sides, which are in double lines,
are —
(1) T. VINDAC. ARIO
VISTIAXICET
* Medici ociilarii and medici ophthalmici are mentioned by the Roman
medical writers in a manner to make us believe that this formed a special
branch of the practice.
CHAP. VIII.] THE MEDICAL PROFESSION. 301
(2) T. VINDACIAR
OVISTI . NAIID
(3) . . VIXDAC . ARI
OVISTICHLOROX
(4) T . A'INDACAKIO
VISTI . . .
The name of tlie colly rium, indicated in tlie last, has been lost
by a fractnre of the stone. The other tlu'ee were the anicetum,
the nardluum, and the cJdoron, well known collyria, all men-
tioned above. Another of these stamps, found at Cirencester
in 1818, is now in the possession of P. B. Purnell, Esq., of
Stanscombe Park, Gloucestershire. It is an oblong piece of
hone-stone, or whet-slate, with two sides inscribed, which com-
memorate a physician named Minervalis. They are —
(1) MINERVALISDIALEB
ANVMADIMPETLIPEXOV
(2) MINERYALISMELINV
ADOMNKMDOLOREM
The dialebanum was composed, with the plant ledanum or
ladanum found in Crete, and it is here directed to be used with
es:!? {ex ovo) on the first attack of lippitudo — ad inipetum I'lppi-
tiidbds. The second was a well-known collyrium, which is
mentioned by the old medical writers under the same name of
meUmim, but the origin of the name seems very doubtful.
Another medicine stamp was found at Bath in 1781. A fourtli
was dug up at Gloucester (not, as some writers have stated by
mistake, at Colchester), at the beginning of the last century, and
^^'as published by Chishull. It bore the name of the physician,
Quintus Julius Murranins, and had two inscriptions —
(1) QIVLIMVRRANIMELI
NVMADCLARITATEM
(2) QIVLMVRRANISTACTV
MOPORALSAMATADCAL
The first of these was another meUniim, which was to be effica-
cious for producing clearness of vision — ad claritatem. The
second was an opobalsamic ^^^c^//;;?, or liquid (from fTTai^w), in-
tended as a remedy for dimness of siglit — ad caUglnem. In
1808, a medicine stamp of an unusual form was found at
Wroxeter in Shropshire {Uncou'umi) ; it was a round, instead
of quadrangular, stone, with the inscription on the face, as in a
302 THE ROMANS. [chap. vm.
seal. It is now preserved in the Museum of Wroxeter anti-
Oculist's Stamp, from Wroxeter [Uricomu/h).
qnities in Slirewsbury, and the inscription is easily read as
follows — •
TIBCLM
DIALIKA
AD-OM
NE A TIT
O EX O
Intimating- that it was the d'laUhauum of Tiberius Claudius the
physician (medictis), for all diseases of the eyes {ad omiie vituim
ocniorum), and was to be applied, like the dlalehanum oi Miner-
valis, ex ovo, with egg.
It is curious that we have thus a series of these medicine
stamps belonging to the great Homan towns in the west,
Corinium, Aquae Solis, Glevum, Magna, and Uriconium. None
have yet been found, as far as we have any distinct infoi'mation,
in the Roman towns of the eastern and northern parts of the
island, but there are two, or at least fragments of two, preserved
in the British Museum, which are stated to have been found in
this country, although the exact locality is not known. One of
these is a iiat quadrilateral stone, and commemorates a physician
named Sextus Julius Sedatus. It is inscribed only on three
sides ; which is also the case with at least one of the foreign
examples. The inscriptions are —
(1) SEXIVLSEDATI
CROCOUPACCIAN
(2) SEXIVLSEDATICRO
COriFSDIALEPIDOS
I
(;^)
IVLSEDATICKO
ESADDIATHES
These collyria were all of the class already mentioned as taking
r
I
CHAP. VIII.] MEDICIXE STAMPS. 302
its 7\ame crocodi^s from one of its ins^-redients, the crocus or saftVon.
The tirst was distiriii-uished by the name Paccianum, from its
inventor, Paccius, a celebrated ancient oculist, several of.Avhose
medicines, as well as this identical crocodes Pacciannm, are
mentioned by Galen. Tiie crocodcs dlalepldos, the second on
our stamp, is also mentioned by tlie ancient medical Avriters,
and derived its name from the circumstance that it contained
tlie scales (XEiricec) of burnt copper, or the black peroxide of
that metal. The second stamp in the British Museum, which
is evidently a mere fragment, bears the letters —
COLLYR-P-CLOC
They are probably to be read colhjrmm post caUginem oculorum,
a collyrium to be used after an attack of dimness of the eyes.
The Museum of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, at
Edinburgh, contains one of tlie oblong medicine stamps, which
was found at Tranent in East Lotliian, near Inveresk, the site
of an extensive Eoman town. It had belonged to an oculist
named Lucius Vallatinus. The two inscriptions are — ■
(1) LVALLATINIEVODESADCI
CATRICESETASPRITYDIX
(2) LVALLATINIAPALOCllO
CODESADDIATHESIS
The first was tlie collyrium named evodes, and was a remedy
against cicatrices of the eyes and granulations of the eyelids.
The second Avas some modification of the usual character of the
crocodes {apaloc r ocodes), v/hich has been interpreted ' a mild
crocodes,' used as a general remedy against affections of the
eyes — ad dlat'keses* The person who cut the inscription has
made an error in the termination of tlie last word.
It has been supposed by writers on the subject of these
stamps, that the various preparations were hardened Mdth gum
or some viscid substance, and kept in a solid state to be liquefied
with fluids wlien required for use; the stamps being impressed
just before the medicines attained the last stage of solidification
* An account of this stamp was first f^oinmunicated by Mr Daniel Wil-
son (iit'terwards Dr Wilsuu), Secretary of the Society of Antiquaries oi
Scotland, to the ' Journal of the Archi^ological Association,' vol. v. p
351, whero an editorial note has been added, to state that 'diathesis can
only imply a particular state of the body disposi/iff to any disease, and not
niean the disease itself.' 'L'his is the use of the word in modern medi-
cine, but the ancient physicians used it in the sense of an affection or dis-
ease.
5(U
THE ROMANS.
[chap. VI n.
The Cirencester stamp is said to have been found in a Roman
urn, but no further particulars of the discovery have been pre-
served. It is a curious circumstance that Cay his (vol. vii. p.
261) has o:iven the rim of an earthen vessel marked by one of
these medicine stamps, which might be supposed to indicate
that the mark was intended to be placed on the vessel containing-
the medicine, and not on the medicine itself. But this may
have arisen from some accident which we cannot now explain,
and the circumstances under which the stamps are generally
found seem to contradict such an inference.
Of Roman trades, in this island, we have fewer indications
even than of professions. What appears to have been the
workshop of an enameller, or perhaps of a fabricator of orna-
mental objects in metal of various kinds, has ah'eady been
opened in the excavations at Wroxeter on the site of Uriconium.
It is probable that the Roman tradesman was seldom com-
memorated in a sepidchral inscription. Mr Roach Smith found
in a very ancient rubbish pit, deep under the site of the Royal
Exchange, in the city of London, the refuse of the shops of
Roman shoemakers, weavers, and workers in other such handi-
crafts. I owe to the pencil of the same zealous and skilful
antiquary the sketch of a monument of a still more remarkable
character — the sign of a Roman goldsmith, found amid the
ruins of a town at Old Malton in Yorkshire, which probably
represents the Roman Derventio. It is a large stone, which has
i
ff ELICIT E RS
^J G"EN iOLO(?C:I-I
SERVVLE-VTER.E
AA^ AV R Efl
n I A/ AAA _
Goldsmith's Sign, from Old Malton [Derventio ? ).
apparently been let into a wall, and bears on one face, within a
label, an inscription which seems to commemorate the shop of
ChAP. viii] SIGN OF A GOLDSMITH'S SHOP. S'^'?
a o-old smith named Servulus. The inscription is as follows —
not very correct in its Latinity : —
rELICITERSIT
GENIO LOCI
SEHVULE-VTERE
FELIXTABEKX
AM AVKEFI
CINAM
I have had occasion more thon onre ir, allude to the practice of
the Romans of invocating* good fortune on every occasion.* The
sign of an artisan here begins with an invocation to the pre-
siding genius or spirit of the locality, — a pro])itiation to the
divinity of the spot on which he settled, that his undertakings
there might prosper, — and next comes the wisli that the owner
of the shop may have good fortune in his profession. Mr Well-
beloved has published the fragment of the commencement of an
inscribed stone, found at York, and containing the w^ords —
GENIO LOCI
EELICITEH
which he believed to be part of a votive tablet. But on com-
paring it with the complete inscription found "at Old Malton, I
am inclined to think that this also may have formed part of a
tradesman's sign.
* These invocations were used in private houses, as well as in shops, and
are sometimes joined with the name of the possessor. Thus, a mutilated
Roman tesselated pavement found at Salzburg, in Germany, presented the
following fragment of an inscription (the name of the person is lost) : —
HIC HABITAT
NIHIL INTK.ET MALI
«." e. ( ) dwells here — ma^ nothing evil enter. This supports our
interpretation of the iascription on the Thruxton pavement.
3oo THE ROMANS. I chap. w.
OJlArTEPt IX.
Ethnological Character of the Roman Population of Britp.in — Countries
Jioni which it was derived — The Auxiliary Troops-^Nanies and
Birthplaces of Individuals — Traces of Languages ; Inscribed Pottery ;
the Roundels found at Colchester — Debased Latinity — Remains of the
British Population.
When avc contemplate these nnmeroiis towns and cities, so
many buildings and pnl)lic Avorks of all descriptions, manufac-
tures, and monuments of art and science, onr inquiries naturally
return to the people from whom they came, and we ask who
were the Romans in Britain ? It is a question much more
complicated in its various bearings than it woidd appear at tlie
first thouglit to those who have not previously studied the
subject.
AVlien Rome first established colonies, they were composed
])urely of Roman citizens, usually of veterans or soldiers, who,
having completed their time, were no longer compelled to serve,
except in defending the town and territory which was given to
them. The land of this territory was distributed among them.
Such was the foundation of Camulodunum {ColcJiestei^), as we
learn incidentally from the narrative of Tacitus. As their con-
uuesLs excendwl. tlie Roman legions, which still consisted of
Italian soldiers, were accompanied with numerons bodies of
auxiliaries, or troops raised from the ditterent countries which
jiad been successively subdued. It was a policy henceforth
pursued with great steadiness by the Roman conquerors to
transplant, under the name of anxiliaries, colonies from one
nation to another, and they thus not only made a gradual
amalgamation of the different peoples who composed the empire,
but they established effective defences without exhausting the
central force.* Gradually, however, while destroying the
nationalities of other peoples, Rome lost its own nationality in
* Cicero, in more passages than one, speaks of the Roman colonics as the
defences of the empire, propuffnacula imperii.
i
ciiAi'. ix.] THE PEOPI.E OF BRITAIX. 307
the mass. Men from those very nations upon wliom ancient
Rome had trampled as barbarians, were made commanders in
its armies, nobles in its senate, and emperors on its throne, s/
The Roman legions were now recrnited indiscriminately, and we
shall have to point ont officers of the lei>-ions in J3ritain, who
were natives of countries far distant from Italy.
Even with our present imperfect information, we can trace
the parcelling- out of l-^ritain among colonies of almost every
people who had been subdued by the Roman arms, and it must
have presented a strange assemblage of races.* The Notitla #
Imperii, composed under Theodosius the younger, and therefore /^
at the close of the Roman domination in Britain, gives us a
]"ather long list of the auxiliary nations who held the towns and
stations along the south-eastern and eastern coasts and in the
north, the parts then exposed to invasion by the Saxons and
the Picts. Thus we learn from that valuable record, that
Othona (supposed to be the lost town of Ythancester, on the
coast of Essex), Avas occupied by a body of Eortensians, who
came from the town of Fortia in Asiatic Sarmatia. Dubra3
(Dove?') was held by Tungricanians, supposed to be only another
form or an error of the scribe for Tungrians. At the Port us
Lemanis {Lymne) there were Gauls from Tornacum (^Toiirnai/).
The Abulci, a Spanish people, held Anderida {Pevenst:!/). At
Regulbium (^llecidver) was the first cohort of Vetasians, or
Iktasians, from Belgic Gaid. On the coasts of Suffolk and
Norfolk, we find Stablesians, perhaps a tribe from Germany,
at Garriannonum {Bu7'f/h Castle), and Dalmatians at Brano-
dunum {Brancaster). There were Dalmatians, again, at Prae-
sidium {^Brovgldon, in Lincolnshire); Crispians, from a town
named Crispiana in Pannonia, at Danura {Doucaster) ; a people
called Barcarii Tigrienses, perhaps from Africa, at Arbeia
{Moresby ?) ; and Nervians, from Belgium, at Dictis {Aiiibh-
side ?). Returning eastward again, we find Solenses, from Cilicia,
at Maglone (supposed by Horsley to be Gretabridge) ; and Pa-
censians from Lusitania or Portugal, at Magse (Piercebridge).
Along the line of Hadrian's Wall, the inhabitants of the dif-
ferent towns were still more varied in their races. Segeduiuim
( U allse)id) was occupied by Lingones from Belgium ; Pons >/
/Elii (^Newcastle) by a people called Cornovii ; Condercum
* I here use the woj-d colony, not in its Roman legal sense, but to signif}-
any town or settlement formed in one country by a body of people from
another.
308 THE ROMANS. [chap. ix.
{Benwell) by Asturians from Spain ; Vindobala (Rutcheste?') by
Frixagi ; Himnum {Halton Chesters) by a tribe whose name
has not been preserved ; Cilurnum {Chesters) by another body
of Spanish Asturians; Proeolitia {Carrawhurgli) by Batavians ;
Borcovicus {?Iousesteads)hy Tungrians; Yindolana {Chesterholm)
by Gauls ; yEsica {Great Chesters) by another colony of Astu-
rians; Magna (Ctt/'wrfl'w) by Dalmatians ; Amboglanna {Bird-
osicald) by Dacians ; Petriana {Cambeck-fort) by Tungrians ;
Aballaba {Watch-cross?^ by Moors; Congavata {Stanwicks)
by Lingones ; Axelodunum {Bnrcjh-on'the-Sands) by Spaniards ;
Gabrosentis {Brumhurgli) by Tliracians. There were Morini
from Gaul at Glannibanta (a town of uncertain site) ; Nervians
at Alionis {Whitley Castle) and at Virosidum {Ellenbo7'ough) .
These are the different races established in Britain mentioned
in the Notitia, because, by their position and the circumstances
of the time, they were obliged to be on active duty. We must
not, however, imagine that they were bodies of troops in tem-
porary quarters which could be changed at pleasure, for in-
scriptions on altars and tombstones, found on many of these
sites, show us that they had remained in the same place from a
very early period of the Roman occupation of the island, and
some monumental stones are stated to have been set up by the
heir or heirs of the deceased {hcei-es, haeredes), which seems
sufficient to prove that they Avere possessors of the land. No
/doubt the colonists of these towns were accompanied or fol-
lowed by relations and friends, and as evidently they we"j
recruited from their own countries, they must have gone on
increasing and strengthening themselves. They were all, how-
ever, obedient to Roman laws and institutions, used the Latin
tongue, and had indeed become entirely Romanised, as we shall
see more and more fully in subsequent chapters.
Many others of the races, who thus colonised towns in
Britain, are now unknown, though a few from time to time
are recovered by the discovery of inscribed stones. In different
places in Cumberland there appear to have been Gauls, Dacians,
and Lingonians. A people called the Carvetii are found at Old
Penrith. Spaniards, Dalmatians, and Betasians, were established
at, or in the neighbourhood of, Ellenborough. At Brougham,
there were Germans. In Scotland, inscriptions mention the
Tungrians in several places : Gauls at Cramond and at Castle-
hill on the Wall of Antoninus; Spaniards at x\.rdoch ; Thracians ;
Hamii from the Elbe, at Barhill fort on Antoninus's Wall ;
jS'ervians, Germans, and Cugerni, a people of Belgic Gaul,
i
CHAP. IX.] DIFFERENT RACES IX ROMAN BRITAIN. 309
l)et\veen the Ubii and the Batavi. The Roman town at
Risinfi'ham, Habitancum, was hehl by the Yag'iones, a people
from the banks of the Rhine. The Varduli, from tlie foot of
the Pyrenees in Spain, were established at Bremenium {Ro-
chester), and they are mentioned also in an inscription found at
Epiacum {LancJiester). An inscription found at Bowes, in York-
shire, proves that that site, the Roman Lavatrse, was hehl by
Thracians. In Lancashire, Coccium {Rlbcheste?') was a settle-
ment of Sarmatians, while Mancunium (^Manchester) was a
colony of Frisians, called, in the inscriptions, Frislngl, Frisones,
and Frlsavl. The latter seem to have found some difficulty in
expressing* the name of their country in the languao-e of their
conquerors. If we descend towards the south, Cirencester
appears to have been occupied by Thracians. The rarity of in-
scriptions in the midland and southern towns renders it at
present impossible to identify the races from which they sever-
ally drew the nucleus of their population.
We see still more how people from all parts of the world
came to intermingle in our island, when we compare their
names as they occur in inscriptions. Thus, in one of the in-
scriptions found at Cirencester, Dannicus, who belonged to the
cavalry stationed there, was a citizen of Rauricum, in Swit-
zerland. Sextus Valerius Genialis, the subject of another
monument at Cirencester, who belonged to the Thracian cavalry,
was a Frisian. Titus Domitius Heron, prefect of the second
cohort of Gauls at Old Penrith in Cumberland, came from
Nicomedia of Bithynia in Asia Minor. iEmilius Crispinus,
prefect of the ala Augusta at Old Carlisle, was a native of
Tusdrus, in Africa {natus in provincla Jfrica de Tusdro).
Publius ^lius, also prefect of the ala Augusta at Old Carlisle,
was a native of Mursa, in Lower Pannonia (de Mursa ex Fan-
nonia wferiore). Marcus Censorius, prefect of the cohort of
Spaniards at EUenborough, was of Nimes, in Gaul (ex provincla
Narbonensi domo Nemausensis). Lucius Duccius, an officer
buried at York, was of Vienna, in Gaul. Flavins Longus, a
tribune of the twentieth legion at Chester, was a native of
Samosata, in Syria, the birth-place of Lucian, An individual
mentioned in an inscription at Lincoln, named Nominius Sacer,
the son of Bruscus, was of the tribe of the Senones, in Gaul
(civis Senonii). Cains Valerius, standard-bearer of the second
legion at Caerleon, was a native of Lugdunum, in Gaul {Lyons).
Julius Vitalis, \\\e fabriciensis of the twentieth legion, comme-
morated in the celebrated inscription found near Bath, was a
}
i
(
310 THE HOMAXS. [chap. ix.
]>elg-ian [)iatione Belga). Cains Miiri-ius, of tlie second leg-fon,
also buried at Bath, was a native of Fosuin Julii in Gaul
{Frfjiis). Cains ('ornelins PeregTinns, the tribune of a cohort
at Maryport, in Cumberland, was a native of Mauritania {ex
provbicla Manritanice Ccjesariensis domo Se . . . . the name ol
the town is broken off). Cornelius A^ictor, a soldier of th«
Ganls of Yindolana at Chesterholm, was a citizen of Pannonii;
[clulfi Panuouloi). Althou<>-h the barbarians frequently assumed
a Roman name, yet in the inscriptions found in Britain wc
often meet with names which betray their provincial orig-in.
Such are Blescius Diovicus, probably the name of a Gaul, found
in an inscription at Rising-ham ; Titus Oisedio, at Cambeck-fort ;
,, Menius Dada, at Carvoran ; Audagus, at Brougham; Iminius
Honius Tertullus, a Gaul, at Cramond,.in Scotland; Marcus
Decius Yoconticus, also in Scothmd ; and Pabius Bera, in the
same country. Hermagora, commemorated in an inscription at
Riechester, and a woi'shipper of Astarte named Pulcher, at
Corbridge, were no doubt Greeks.
VVlien we contemplate the facility with Avhich the Romans
moulded the nations they had conquered to tlieir own govern-
ment and manners, we feel inclined to doubt the existence
among the ancients of those deepl^'^ implanted Srentiments of
nationality which are observed in modern times. The moment
a new country was subdued, its inhabitants seem to have
rivalled each other in their eagerness to become Romanised,
and to have soon relinquished the manners, the worship, and
even the languai>-e, which they had received from their forefathers.
Yet it was hardly possible that here and there some sentiment
of attachment for the land of nativity and its recollection^
should not outlive the change, some confession of the influence
of old superstition, some remains of reverence for the gods
of their ancient land, or some remembrance of friends, or
places, or language. We have seen how often the original
country of the deceased was commemorated on his tombstone.
Perhaps, if we examine closely the names of Romano-British
towns, and could compare them extensively with those of the
countries from which their founders came, we should find, as in
British America at the present day, that they also were more
or less commemorative of the land they had left.* Instances
* It h<as often struck me that we ought to look for the derivation of the
iianies of the Roman towns in Britain rather fnmi the countries from which
tne settlers came, than from the 2^^'C^U})wd language of the original Celtic
population. Thus we know that Aballaba in the North was a colony of
I
CHAP. IX.] DIFFEREXT RACES IX ROMAX CRITAIX. 311
have also been met with among the Iloman remains found in
Britain of inscriptions rudely scratched on cups and bowls,
and other articles, in languages of which we are now ig-norant.
Some of these were in the possession of Mr Roach Smith, and
have been pronounced by an oriental scholar, I think somewhat
hastily, to be Arabic. Perhaps we should look rather for the
language in which tliey are written, to Spain or Africa. I
believe these inscriptions have been found chiefly in Loiidon
and at Exeter. At Colchester, a very curious class of anti-
rpiities has been found, the use of which is not very apparent.
These are thin roundels of reddish earthenware, on the surface
of Avhich inscriptions — usually names or numei'als — and figures
of animals, &c., have been scratched. It has been conjectured
that these may have been tickets of admission to the theatre or
amphitheatre. One of them has a roughly drawn Egyptian
cartouche, with a name in hieroglyphics, a proof that there was
at least one Egyptian resident at Camulodiuium. Others appear
to be Hebi-ew.
It is also to be noticed, as illustrating the variety of race
which here passed under the name of Eomaus, that the inscrip-
tions not unfrequently contain errors in spelling and in Latinity,
which seem to show that they were composed by persons whose
mother tongue was not Latin. In an inscription at Caerleon an
adjective in the feminine gender is joined with a masculine
name. In an inscription found in Cund^erland we liave doiiin
instead of domo. We hud still more frequently such errors as
numeni for numhi.i, aginte for ageiite, and the like, which show
the Latin tongue spoken by a people whose pronunciation was
organically different from that of the Eomans. Thus we trace,
at this early period, one of the causes which led to the forma-
tion of th(; neo-Latiu dialects of the middle ages.
Among this variety of races, we are led naturally to inquire,
what had become of the original Britons? What portion of the
population of the island did they form ? Unfortunately we arc
entirely wanting in the materials for solving so interesting a
(piestion. It appears that British troops served as auxiliaries
in the Koman army in I^ritain during the wars of Agricolu ;
and we know that they afterwards served thus in various parts
of the Roman empire, though it seems contrary to the Roman
policy to have employed them thus in their nativD land.
Moors, and certainly the name sounds Moorish. Some of the names of
Roman towns in Britain are identical with towns ou the continent, from
which the settlers may have been brouaht.
)
)
312
THE ROMANS.
[chap, IX.
Horsley '/ives a fraf^ment of a votive tablc^t found at Castlecan
ill Scotland, on which was traced the word britton ; and
another was found at Ebchester in Durliam, dedicated to tlie
goddess Minerva by Julius Gneiieius, who is styled actvarivs
coHORTis iiii. BR, but the last letter appears to have been
doubtful. Inscriptions are said also to have been found in the
north conveyino- the words civitas domni, civitas dvmnon,
civiTATE CATUVELLAVNORVM, and civiTAT BRicic, signifying
that the British tribes thus indicated were employed in the
erection of Hadrian's Wall. This would show that at that
period they were still allowed a certain degree of political exist-
ence. But this no doubt was soon taken from them, and the few
glimpses we have of tlie earlier period of their history wonhl
seem to show that they were gradually reduced to the lowest
degree of dependence. In the towns of the legions or of the
auxiliaries they would not be allowed to enjoy any rights, and
it is probable that in the latter part of the Roman period the
British blood in the south was found chiefly in the peasantry, y
The name of Britons was then applied almost exclusively to
J the independent tribes of Caledonia.
CHAP. X.J RELIGIOUS WORSHIP. 313
CHAPTEE X.
Religious Worship of the Rotnans in Britain — Roman chief Deities : Jupi-
ter, Mars, Apollo, Minerva, Ceres, «fec. — The eight Deities — liesser
Deities ; Silvanus, ^sculapius — Grecian and Eastern Deities ; the
Tyrian Hercules, Mithras, Serapis — The Nymphs and Genii, Fortune,
and Deified Personifications — Deities of the Auxiliary Races : the
Deae Matres, Viteres or Vitris, Belatucadrus, Cocidius, Mogontis, &:c.
— Did Christianity prevail or exist in Roman Britain ?
No characteristics of races are more permanent than their re-
ligious belief and superstitions, and we may expect in these, if
in anything', to perceive some traces of the original peoples vvlio
formed tlie Roman state of Britain through the outward cover-
ing of Roman forms. Our expectations in this respect will not
be entirely disappointed, for amid the immense numbers of
altars found in this island dedicated to the gods of Rome, we
find some dedicated to deities Avhose names are new to us, and
who, there can be little doubt, belonged to the distant province
to which the auxiliary owed his birth. We know iiow tolerant
in this respect the Roman mythology ever showed itself, and
though, as a matter of course, those who served under its
banners were bound to show reverence to Rome's gods, they
were not restricted from offering homage to those who had been
worshipped by their own foref[\thers.
We have already stated that almost every town, or station,
had its temple, or more usually, its temples, dedicated to differ-
ent deities. Of these, as far as discoveries have yet gone, few
traces now remain. The materials of which they were built
were too valuable in subsequent ages to remain untouched, and
the stones were cleared away, and their sculptures and inscrip-
tions defaced, by mediaeval builders. Immense quantities of
altars shared the same fate, and the great number of these
moniunents which still exist, shows beyond a doubt how very
u
314 THE ROMANS. [chai. x.
numerous they must have been. In the wild country aloiijj^
the line of Hadrian's Wall, where they have escaped destruc-
tion in greater numbers than elsewhere, it was a practice amon<»:
the peasantry, even within the memory of man, to chip away
the sculptures and inscriptions wherever they found them, be-
cause they associated them in their minds with notions of mag-ic
and witchcraft. The altars to the diflerent deities — especially
to the lesser objects of worship — seem to have been placed
within the temples of the superior gods in tlie same manner
that the saints had their chapels and shrines in the K-omish
churches ; and they were perhaps also placed in the open air,
by the forum, or on the roadside, or in the cemeteries, like the
Romish crosses.
The Roman altar consisted usually of a rectangular block of
stone, with an inscription in front. On each side were carved
ornaments, usually representing the instruments of sacrifice,
ihe pi'cefericulum, or pitcher, which contained the wine for the
oifering ; the patera^ a dish with a handle, used for throwing a
portion of the wine upon the altar; tiie securls, or axe, with
which the animal was slain ; and the cnlter, or knife, used in
cutting it up ; with a figure of the whole or part of the victim,
usually the head of an ox. Sometimes other figures were in-
troduced, emblematical of the deitvto whom the altar was dedi-
cated, or relating perhaps in some cases to the dedicator. The
back of the altar is usually rough, which shows that it was
intended to be placed against a wall. The upper part was the
most elaborately ornamented, and in the middle of the upper
surface a basin -shaped cavity was sunk in the stone, called the
focus (or hearth), which received the portion of the victim that
was offered up in sacrifice, and burnt in the fire kindled ni the
focus. The inscription set forth first the deity to whom the
altar was dedicated, next the name and condition of the dedi-
cator, and often concluded with stating the cause of dedication.
This was usually a vow.
This description will be best understood by comparison with
the annexed cut, which represents a Roman altar dedicated to
Jupiter, found at Tynemouth, in Northumberland, and now
preserved in tlie museum of the Society of Antiquaries of
London. It was dedicated by the prefect of the fourth cohort
of Lingones, which, we are informed by the Notitia, was
stationed at Segedunum, usually placed at Wallsend, of wdiich
Tynemouth is, probably, the site of an advanced outpost ; or,
perhaps, it may have been carried from the ruins of Segedunum,
I
CHAP. X.]
WORSHIP OF JUriTER.
S16
as materials for the foundations of the celebrated monastery at
the mouth of the Tyne. On one side, which is concealed in
the perspective view, but given in the side sketcli, are seen tJic
Altar to Jupiter, found at Tynemouth.
pra'fiulcnhiui, the seciois, or axe, and the culter, or knife, witii
the; usual ox's head. On the other side is \}i\^ patera, supported
by two serpents, which had no doubt a symbolical sia^nihcation.
The inscription commences with the ordinary initials of dedica-
tion to the chief deity of the mythology of Rome, i. o. M., and
must be read as follows : —
l[0Vl] o[PTIMOj m[aXIM0]
a'el[iVS] RVrvs
rR.'F:F[ECTVs] coh[oiitis]
nil LINGO
N VM
To Jupiter the best and greatest,
JElius Rut'us
the prefect of cohort the
fourth of the Lingo-
nes.
Numerous inscriptions to Jupiter have been found in Britain,
which show that all the various races brought together in this
island joined in worshipping the chief deity of Rome. We
have just seen that he was reverenced by the Lingones at
\\allsend. An altar found at Birdoswald (^/Imbof/lanua), wn's
316 THE ROMANS. [chap. x.
dedicated to Jupiter by the Dacians ; another, found at Cam-
heck-foit {Petriand), was dedicated to the same deity by the
Tungrians ; and a third, found at Maryport, by the Spaniards.
Other altars dedicated to Jupiter have been i'ound at Auchin-
davy, in Scotland; at Old Carlisle {Olenacum) ; at Chesterholni
(Vrndolana), dedicated by Gauls; at Housesteads (Borcovlcus),
by the Tunorians ; at Ellenborouoh {Virosidiim) , by Spaniards ;
at Plunipton Wall {uncertain), by Gauls; at Netherby (Castra
vxploratorurn) ; at Lauercost and Bevvcastle {uncertai7i), all by
Dacians ; at Lanchester (Epiacum) ; at Chester [Deva), by the
twentieth leoion ; at Caerleon (Isca), by the second legion ; and
at York by the sixth legion. Many others might be added to
the list. In some of these altars the deity is distinguished by
peculiar appellations, or is joined Avith others. Three altars
have been found in Britain dedicated to Jupiter Dolichenus.
One of these was found in the middle of the seventeenth cen-
tury in the neighbourhood of Caerleon, at a place named St
Julians, and was read as follows : — -
lovi.o.M. DOLICHV To Jupiter the best and greatest,
I. ON." AEMILIANVS the Dolichene, JBiinilianus
CALPVRNivs Calpurnius
KVFiLiANVS . . .EC Rutiliunus {dedicates this) by
AVGVSTORVM the eiJiperors'
MONITV direction.
There appears to have been a peculiar aptness in the epithet as
used in this locality, which was on the edge of the great iron
district. Reinesius has printed an inscription found at Rome
which describes this title as bearing reference to a place where
iron was produced : —
lOVI OPTIMO MAXIMO DOLYCHENO
VBI FEKKYM NASCITVR C SEMPRO
MIVS RECTVS CENT VII FRVMENTARIVS
' The Doliche,' Mr Roach Smith observes,* ' which gives
the name of Dolichenus to Jupiter, was most probably the
town of that name in Macedonia, a country which, Strabo
says, abounded in iron ; and to this Doliche, the words in the
last inscription, ubi ferrum nascltur, where iron is produced,
seem more applicable, than to Dolichenes, a city of Commagene,
♦ In the JBrst number of his Collectanea, where he has published some
other inscriptions to .Jupiter Dolichenus.
CHAP. X.] THE WORSHIP OF JUPITER. 317
in Asia, whence, according to Stephanus, this name was
derived.' Two other altars dedicated to Jupiter Dolichenus
are published by Horsley, one found in the neighbourhood of
Newcastle, in the midst of the coal district, where remains of
ancient coal-mines have been found, the other at Risingham
{Habitanciim).
Early in tlie seventeenth century, an altar was found at
('hester dedicated to Jupiter under the name or epithet of
Tanarus : —
I. o. M. TAXAUO To Jupiter, best and greatest, Tanarus,
T. ELVPivs GALER Titus Elupius Praesens of the tribe Galeria,
I'KAESENS GVXTIA of Guntia (a town in Vindelicia),
PHI. LEG. XX vv prefect of the twentieth legion, styled volois victrix,
COMMODO ET Coniniodus and
LATEKANO Lateranus
cos being consuls,
V. s. L. M. performed his vow willingly and dutifully.
The date of this inscription is fixed, by the names of the con-
suls, in the year 154. It is curious for several reasons. Tan-
arus is supposed, and apparently with good reason, to be the
Teutonic Thunar, the Scandinavian Thor, whose name is pre-
served in our Thursday, and who is always identiHed with the
classic Jupiter. It tints shows the influence of Teutonic feel-
ings in England at a very early period.
Jupiter is often combined in these inscriptions with other
deities or objects of worship. An altar found at Chesterholm
in Northumberland (Fmdolana), is dedicated by Quintus
i*etronius, prefect of the Gauls established there, Jovi optimo
viaxlmo caterisque diis immortalibiis et genio prator'd — to
Jupiter, best and greatest, and to the rest of the immortal
gods, and to the genius of the prsetorium. A centurion of the
second legion dedicated an altar, found at Auchindavy in
Scotland, to Jupiter and Victoria victrix — Victory the van-
quisher. An altar found at York bore the following inscrip-
tion : —
I. o. M. To Jupiter best and greatest,
Dis. UEABVsavE and to the gods and goddesses
HOSPITALIBVS . PE who preside over the household,
NATiBVSQ . OBCON and to the penates, for the
8ERVATAM , SALVTEM preservation of the health
8VAM . svoRVMU of hiiuself and his family,
P . AEL . MARCIAN Publius ^lius Marcianus,
vs . PRAEF . COH prefect of a cohort,
ARAM . SAC . F . NO . D, dedicated and consecrated this altar.
318 TnE ROMANS. [chap. x.
Even the emperor liimself was thus associated with the deity,
At Housesteads, on the Wall of Hadrian (Borcovicus), an altar
has been found with the inscription —
I. o. M. To Jupiter the best and greatest,
ET NVMiNiBvs and the deities
AVG COH I TV of Augustus, the first cohort
NGRORVM of the Tungrians,
MIL cvi PRAEE a military one, commanded
ST Q, VEKivs by Quintus Yerius
svpERSTis Superstis,
PRAEEECTVS its prefect.
'The emperor himself,' as Mr Bruce observes, 'is probably
intended by this phrase, not the gods whom the emperor wor-
shipped. The use of the noun in the plural number, riumiiw,
is not opposed to this view. Horsley remarks that numina is
frequently, in classical writers, applied to a particular deity ;
thus we have numina Diana in Horace, and numina Phoebi in
Virgil. The emperors, Ave know, were frequently worshipped
as gods. The Mantuan bard, addressing Augustus, has no
doubt of his divinity, though he knows not what region to
assign to his especial care : —
. . . . urbesne invisere Caesar,
Terrarumque velis curam ; . . . .
An deus immensi venias maris, ac tua nautse
Numina sola colant.'
Other altars have been found in Britain dedicated to Jupiter
H viuminibus Augusti, or Aiigustorum.
Perhaps, after Jupiter, the deity most extensively Avorshipped
in Roman Britain was Mars, which is easily explained by the
military character of the mass of the settlers. Mars, like
J upiter, is often coupled with other divinities, and distinguished
by various epithets. At Ben well [Condercum), an altar was
found dedicated to Mars, the contjueror and avenger — deo
Marti vidori vindici. An altar was dedicated by the Bsetassi
at Ellenborough to the military Mars, — Marti militari — which
we should imagine to be an unnecessary epithet. One found at
Lanchester {Epiacum), was dedicated Marti Augusti, to Mars
of Augustus. An altar foimd at Ribchester [Cocci?mi), was
dedicated deo Mai'ti et Victoria dominoruvi Augustorum — to
the god Mars and Victory of the emperors. Another altar
found at the same place was dedicated Marti pacifero — to
CHAP. X.]
MARS AND APOLLO.
319
Mars the peace-bearer. Amono^ several altars dedicated by a
Koman officer named Cocceius Pirmus, and found at Aiichindavy,
in Scotland, was one witli the following inscription : —
MARTI
MINEKVAE
CAMPESTKI
BVS HERO . . ,
EPONA
VICTORIAE
M COCCEI
PIRMVS
C LEG II AVG
To Mars,
to Minerva,
to the deities of the fields,
to Hero,
to Epona,
to Victory,
Marcus Cocceius
Firmus,
centurion of the second legion
called Augusta.
A singular epithet is given to Mars on an altar found at
Iladdon Hall, iu Derbyshire, with the following inscription : —
DEO To the god
MARTI Mars
RRACIACAE Braciaca,
osiTTivs Osittius
CAECii-iAX Ctecilianus,
PRAEFKCT prefect
COH I AQViTAXi of the first cohort of the Aquitani,
Y . s in performance of a vow.
Horsley supposes that Braciaca is the name of a place. Other
epithets, or synonyms, applied to Mars, will be mentioned further
on. Altars dedicated to this god have also been found at Lan-
chester, Castlesteads, Lancaster, and other places.
Dedications to Apollo, in his simple classical character, are
of rarer occurrence. One found on the line of Hadrian's Wall
bears the following inscription : —
l)EO APOL
INI ET O. X
SIXIS EXPL
CVI PR SVLP
VOTVM S
L. L. M.
To the god Apollo
and all the deities,
the left wing of exploratores (or guides),
under the command of Sulpicius,
in discharge of a vow,
most willingly and dutifully {dedicates
this).
An altar found at E,ibchester (Coccium), dedicated to this deitv,
is more curious, though somewhat more obscure. It was first
ilescribed by Camden, and the inscription very incorrectly
copied, and it was afterwards supposed to be lost, till Dr
Whitaker discovered it in 1815 at Sahsbury Hall ; it is now
320 THE ROMANS. [chap. x.
preserved in St John's College, Cambridge, The inscription
runs thus :
DEO SANCTO To the holy g'od
APOLLONI APOXC Apollo ApOTlUS,
OB SALVTEM UN for the health of our lord (fhe emperor),
AL EQ SAK.M the wing of Sarmatian horse
liREMETNN of Bremetenracum,
SVB DiANio under Dianius
ANTONINO Antoninus,
c LEG VI V centurion of the sixth legion, called
ic DOMV the conquering-, his native town
ELIBER was Eliber.
The god is said to have received his appellation of Aponus
from the Fontes Aponi, warm springs near Padna, at a place
still called Poni, which were celebrated for their medicinal
qualities. At Inveresk, in Scotland, an altar had been found
dedicated to Apollo Qrannus; and at Auchindavy there Avas
one dedicated conjointly to Apollo and Diana. An altar and
the dedication of a temple to Diana, have been found at Caer-
leon {Isca).
Altars to the female deities of Rome are not numerous among
those hitherto found in Britain. I am not aware of any instance
of a dedication to Yenus, but I believe there is one to Juno.
Minerva occurs on several occasions. Under the title of
Suliminerva she had a magnificent temple at Bath [AqucB
Soils), the inscription on which was restored by Lysons. There
Avas a temple to Minerva at Ribchester {Coccium), the dedi-
cation of which was commemorated in an inscription found
there in 1811.* Minerva is joined with Neptune in the cele-
brated inscription relating to the dedication of a temple at
Chichester {Begniini). A small altar found at Rochester in
Northumberland [Breineninm) , was dedicated to ]\Iinerva in
the following simple inscription : —
BEAE MI
To the goddess
NERVE IVL
Minerva, Julius
CARANTVS
Carantus
S. C.
dedicated this.
Minerva is joined Avith Mars in an inscription already men-
tioned as found at Auchindavy, in Scotland. At Kirk Haugh,
* DEAE MINERAAE PRO SALVTE IMP ALEXANDRI AVG ET lA'LI MAM-
MEAE MATRIS DN ET CASTR SVOR ET VAL CRESCENTIS FULA'IANI LEO
EIVS PP PR PR T FLORIDA'S NATALIS LEG PRAEP N ET REGINAE TEM-
PLVM A SOLO EX RESPONSV RESTITVIT ET DEDICAVIT.
CHAP. X.]
INSCRIPTIOX TO CERES.
321
in Northumberland, an altar was discovered, dedicated decs
M'mervcB et Herctdi victori — to the goddess Minerva, and to
Hercules the conqueror. But perhaps the most curious in-
scription found in this country, is a slab discovered in 1816 at
Carvoran {Magna), containing an inscription relating to the;
goddess Ceres, consisting of a sort of mystical declaration of the
creed of a Roman tribune composed in iambic verse. The an-
nexed cut, taken from Mr Brace's work on tlie lloman Wall,
IHtr'"|lil||||il!U|IMri'V|l(r(jatT-:'';-'!.'^^'- ''■;;■;'■■ ■■'■ ' ■ ll" ' ■ . I " l'( I'M
Inscription to Ceres, found at Carvoran [Magna).
represents this slab and its inscription, which, arranged properlv
in lines, is as follows : —
Imniinet leoni virgo caelesti situ
Spicifera, justi inventrix, urbium conditrix,
Ex quis muneribus nosse contigit deos.
Ergo eadem mater divum, pax, virtus, Ceres ;
Dea Syria ; lanoe vitam et jura pensitans.
In cfelo visum Syria sidus edidit
Libyse colendum, inde cuncti didicimus ;
Ita intellexit, nuniine inductus tuo,
Marcus Caicilius Donatinus, militans
Tribunus in praefecto dono principis.
322 THE ROMANS. [chap. x.
It has been thus translated by Mr Bruce : —
The Virgin in her celestial seat overhang's the Lion,
Producer of com, inventress of right, foundress of cities,
By which functions it has been our good fortune to know the deities.
Therefore the same Virgin is the mother of the gods, is peace, is
virtue, is Ceres;
Is the Syrian Goddess, poising life and laws in a balance.
The constellation beheld in the sky hath Syria sent forth
To Libya to be wor^ihipped, then(!e have all of us learnt it ;
Thus hath understood, overspread by thy protecting influence,
Mitrcus Caecilius Donatinus, a warfaring
Tribune in the office of prefect, by the bounty of the emperor.
* Csecilius,' as Mr Bruce observes, ' probably prepared this
exposition of his faith on being admitted into the mysteries of
Ceres.' An altar dedicated to the goddess under one of tlie
titles here mentioned — deae svriak — was found at Little
Chesters, in Northumberland; it was raised by an officer of one
of the auxiliary cohorts, named Aulus Licinius Clemens, in the
propraetorship of Calpurnius Agricola, that is, between the years
162 and 180. * •
Mercury is often figured among Homan remains found in
this island, and an altar was found at Birrens, in Scotland,
dedicated to this deity by Julius Cerealis Censorinus, image-
maker of the college of the ligniferi, which appear to have
been a religious order attached to the worship of tlie gods, and
the occupation of Cerealis was to make their statues : —
DEO MERCv To the god Mercury,
RIO IVL CRS Julius Cerealis
CENS siGiLL Censorinus, image-maker
COL LiGN CVLT of the College of ligniferi, his worshippers,
Eivs D s 1> gave it at his own cost,
V. s. L. M. in performance of a vow willingly and dutifully
Mercury appears to have been the favourite deity of this col-
lege, for they also dedicated a statue of Mercury to the god and
to the emperor — numini Angusti deo Mercurio,
We have already seen how the principal deities were often
combined together, or with others. One of these combinations,
which was very popular, consisted of the deities who presided
over the days of the week — the signa or planets — combined
Avith another to make up the number eight. They were Sol, or
Apollo, who presided over Sunday {dies soils) ; the moon, or
Diana, for Monday ; Mars, for Tuesday ; Mercury, for Wed-
CHAP. X.] GODS OF THE DAYS OF THE WEEK. 32:^
nesday ; Jupiter, for TImrsdnv ; Venus, for Friday ; and Saturn,
for Saturday. They are thus enumerated in an ' eclogue,' or
epigram, of Ausonius —
Primum supremumque diem radiatus habet Sol ;
Proxima fi'aternae sucoedit Lima coronas ;
Tertius assequitur Titania luinina Mavors ;
Mercurius quarti sibi vindicat astra diei ;
Inlustrant quintam Jovis aurea sidera zonam ;
Sexta salutigenim sequitur Venus alma parentem ;
Cuncta supergrediens Saturni septima lux est ;
Ootavum instaurat revolubilis orbita Solem.
In most of the Roman monuments the week commences with
Saturn (Saturday), and not, as in Ausonius, with Sol (Sunday).
A fragment of an octagotial monument in stone, scidptured
with the eight deities, which long lay neglected in a black-
smith's shop at Chesterford, in Essex, and is now in the British
Museum, contains four of these figiu'es, namely Mars, Mercury,
Jupiter, and Venus. It is a curious circumstance that at the
same station, Chesterford, portions of two of the indented
earthenware vessels made in the Durobrivian potteries have been
found, which had the eight deities tigured in eight indentations.
In the volume of the ' Magna Britannia ' of Lysons for Cum-
berland, are engravings of sculptures, in rather superior work-
manship, of deities found at Plumpton Wall, which appear also
to have belonged to the eight deities. They are represented in
the tesselated pavement of what has been called the Medusa
room, in the Eoman villa at Bramdean, in Hampshire. Mr
Roach Smith possesses a very curious bronze forceps, found in
t!ie bed of the Thames, the purpose of which is by no means
evident ; but representations of these planetary deities in busts
are arranged on the two parallel shanks. They commence at
the bottom of the left shank with Saturn, and conclude at the
bottom of the opposite side with the bust of a female divinity,
supposed to be Ceres, wdiich completes the number eight. It
is from this number that the French still call the week halt
jours, and the Germans acht tatje. We have ourselves pre-
served the reckoning of our Saxon forefathers, and instead of
calling the week huit jours, and the two weeks qu'vnze jours,
with the French, we call them smydglit (seven nights), and
fortmyJit (fourteen nights). Mr Roach Smith, who has given
some remarks on these deities in the second volume of his
' Collectanea,' informs us that there is, ' in the Museum at
Mayence, a votive altar, found at Castel, on the opposite side
324 THE ROMANS. [chap. x.
of the Rhine, which belono^s to the same cLiss of mythic repre-
sentations as those on the Bramdean pavement and on the forceps.
This monument is about three feet and a half hig-h, and is
divided into two parts, the lower of which is quadrilateral ; the
upper, of smaller dimensions, octagonal. On the former are
sculptured the full-leng-th figures of Mercury, Hercules, Minerva,
and Juno ; the latter contains busts of Saturn, Sol, Luna, Mars,
Mercury, Jupiter, and Venus ; the eighth compartment is in-
scribed IN H D D, m lionorem domus dlmnce. Over the left
shoulder of Saturn is a sickle in form of our modern bill-hook ;
Sol wears a radiated crown ; Luna, a crescent ; Mars is helmet-
ed, and carries ashield; the head of Mercury is winged; the
bust of Jupiter has been injured, and his emblems are not clearly
to be recognised ; Yenus carries a mirror. Other museums in
Germany, I am informed, contain sculptures of the planets
similarly arranged. Montfaucon has published an engraving of
the seven busts, in a boat, or more probably a half-moon, in
bronze.' In the Bramdean pavement, where they are similarly
represented in busts, Saturn, as the first, has been destroyed
with a portion of the pavement ; Sol is represented with the
radiated crown, and with his usual attribute, a whip ; Luna has
the crescent ; Mars is distinguished by his helmet and spear ;
Mercury has a winged cap, and the caduceus in his hand ;
Jupiter, a sceptre in the form of a trident; and A^enus, a
mirror. The eighth head has been destroyed by the same
fracture which has erased the figure of Saturn. This eighth
figure seems to have been chosen almost at pleasure.
The minor deities and heroes of Roman mythology also have
their place among the Roman altars found in Britain. Silvanus,
the god of forests and of hunting, was an object of general
reverence. We have already (p. 257) given an inscription
dedicating an altar to Silvanus, in consequence of the slaughter
of an enormous boar. An altar found at Birdoswald (^Amho-
glatma) bears the following inscription : —
DEO SANCTO To the holy God
siLVANO VE Silvanus,
NATORES The hunters of
BANNE ss Banna have consecrated this.
At Moresby, in Cumberland, an altar was found dedicated to
the God Silvanus (deo silvano), by the second cohort of
Lingones. Another, dedicated to the same deity, was found at
Netherby, and another at Newcastle-upon-Tyne. An altar
CHAP. X ] THE ORIENTAL DEITIES. 32o
found in the north of England was dedicated Slloano Paniheo.
In Scotland, a mutilated altar dedicated to Silvanus was found
at Castlecary ; and one found at Eidon bore the follou'ing in-
scription : —
DEO siLVA To the g'od Silvanus,
NO PRO SA tor the health (or welfare)
LVTE SVA ET of himself and
SVORVM CAK his family,
Rivs DOMITI Carrius Domitianus,
ANVS 0 LEG XX centurion of the twentieth legion
vv vs LL M the valiant and victorious, perforins his
vow most willingly and dutifully.
Altars were dedicated to other gods for health and welfare.
An altar to iEsculapius found at Lanchester, in Durham, bears
a Greek inscription, stating that it was dedicated to the god by
a tribune named Titus Flavins Titianus, for the recovery of his
health {vTrep (Ttorrjpiag). Altars dedicated to Hercules are not
very uncommon. They have been found on the line of Hadrian's
AVall and in Scotland. An altar was dedicated by the Vangiones
at Habitancum [Rlsinr/hani) to Hercules, as tlie unconquered
god — deo inmcto Hercull. Another altar found in the nortli
was dedicated to Hercules and the deity of Augustus — Hercnll
ct nmnini Aug. An altar found at Polmont in Scotland, was
dedicated by a soldier in a troop of Tungrian cavalry to Her-
cules Magusanus, an epithet which the deity derived from
Magusa, a town of Ethiopia, from wlience, perhaps, the dedi-
cator came. At Corbridge an altar was dedicated by a Grecian
priestess to the Tyrian Hercules, with the brief inscription : —
HPAKAEI To Hercules
TIPPIQ the Tyriau,
AIOAQPA Diodora
APXIEPEIA the high-priestcss.
Several of the Syrian and Oriental deities shared with those
of Home the devotion of the inhabitants of Britain. At (.'or-
bridge ( Corstopitum), where there appears to have been a Gra^^o-
Syriac population, an altar has been found dedicated to tiie
Pliccnician Astarte, the Ashtaroth of Scripture, with an inscrip-
tion which forms a line in Greek hexameter verse.
A C T A PT H C Of Astarte
BQMON M the altar me
ECOPAC you see,
nOYAXEP M Pulcherme
ANEeHKEIs dedicated.
326
THE ROMANS.
[CIlAl-. X.
Tlie curious fio^ured plate of silver found at Corbridg-e in 1734,
and known as the Corbridfi:^ lanx, had no doubt some connection
with the mysterious worship which these inscriptions show to
have existed there under the Romans. It contained figures of
Diana, Minerva, Juno, Vesta, and Apollo, with other objects,
the meaning of which is obscure
Another eastern superstition, the Mithraism of Persia, had
])lanted itself deeply in this island. The worship of Mithras
was established at Rome under Trajan, and it afterwards spread
through the western provinces of the empire. An altar found
at Housesteads in Northumberland (Borcovicus) was erected in
the year 252, when Gallus and Volusianus were consuls. It
bears the following inscription, in which the title of Jupiter
(i. o. M., or Jovi Optimo maximo), is usurped : —
T). o. M.
INVICTO MIT
RAE SAECVLAKI
PV15L rilOCVLI
NVS 0 PKO SE
ET PROCVLO FIL
SVO V S L M
DD NN GALLO ET
YOLVSINO COS
To the god best and greatest,
the invincible Mith-
ras, lord of ages,
Publius Proculi-
nus, centurion, for himself
and his son Proculus,
performs his vow willingly and dutifully,
our lords Gallus and
Volusianus being consuls.
This altar was found in a Mithraic cave. We know that a cave,
or, at least, a dark and generally subterranean room repre-
senting a cave, Avas properly the scene of the worship of this
deity, which continued long- established in the western empire.
We are told that as late as the year 378, G-racchus, prefect of
Rome, destroyed the cave of Mithras in that imperial capital.
Porphyry tells us that Mithras was worshipped in a cave,
because this was the image and symbol of the world, and that
it was dark, because the essence of the virtues is obscure.
The mysticism of the Mithraic worship entered deeply into the
doctrines of the Neo-Platonists, to whose school Porphyry
belonged. ' The cave at Housesteads,' says Mr Bruce, ' was
situated in the valley to the south of the station. It was dis-
covered in 1822 by the tenant of the farm in which it stood,
who fixed upon the spot as one likely to yield him the material
which he required for building a stone fence hard by. The
building was square ; its sides faced the cardinal points ; it had
been originally, as was u'sually the case in a Mithraic temple,
permeated by a small stream. Hodgson, who saw it as soon
as it was laid bare, says, " The cave itself seems to have been a
CHAP. X.] WORSHIP OF MITHIIAS. 327
low contemptible hovel, dag out of a hill-side, lined with dry
walls, and covered with earth or straw." Tlioug-h the building-
has been entirely removed, a small hollow is left which marks
the spot where it stood. All the sculptured stones have happily
been placed in the custody of the Society of Antiquaries of
Newcastle-upon-Tyne.'
The largest of these sculptures appeared to have been broken
to pieces, and part of it carried away ; it has been one of those
remarkable bas-reliefs of which so many examples have been
found on the sites of the Mithraic worship in the Roman pro-
vinces. The god Avas usually represented as a youth wearing
the Phrygian l)onnet and costume, and kneeling on a prostrate
bull, which he is sacrificing. Among the numerous figures ami
emblems attendant on this group, the most conspicuous are a
])ersonage carrying an uplifted torch, representing the sun in
the vernal equinox, and another with an extinguished and
reserved torch, representing the sun on its approach to the
winter solstice. These two figures are otherwise explained as
the guides and guardians of souls into and out of life ; the one
with the inverted torch denoting the descent of the souls to /
earth ; the other, with the torch erect, their return to heaven, v
One of these figures, nearly entire, Avas found among the frag-
ments in the cave at Housesteads. The remaining portions of
this monument had, no doubt, been carried away and broken
up at a remote period — perhaps for the sake of the material —
by the ignorant peasantry of the neighbourhood. Another
sculptured stone, found in the same place, represented a figure
of Mithras, holding a sword in his right hand, and a rather
indefined spiral object in his left, in the centre of an egg-shaped
tablet, on which were sculptured the signs of the zodiac.
Other altars, besides the one of which the inscription is given
above, were found in this cave. One bore an equally interest-
ing inscription, Avhich was easily read as follows : —
DEO To the god
SOLI iNvi the sun, the in-
CTO MiTii.E vincible Mithras,
SAECVLARi the lord of ages,
LiTORivs Litorius
PACATIANVS Facatianus,
B F. COS. PRO a consular beneficiary, for
SE ET svis. V. s himself and family, fulfils his vow
L. M. willingly and dutifully.
An inscription found at lliechester in Northumberland com-
328 THE ROMANS. [chap. x.
inemoratcs the dedication of a temple, deo invlcto soil socio
sacrum, by Lucius Caecilius Optatus, a tribune of the first
cohort of the Varduli. Another smaller altar found in this
cave, from that circumstance, identifies Mithras with the sun ;
it bears the simple inscription, —
SOLI To the Sun,
HiEKOX Hieronymus,
v. L. M. performs his vow willingly and dutifully.
It is to be re<>:retted that even bare walls, which marked the
site in this island of those dark and fearful mysteries, which
w^ere said to have been stained with human blood, and which are
I'epresented as having been a principal cause of the murder of
Ihe imperial tyrant, Heliogabalus, should have been wantonly
destroyed. It was a national monument of no little value.
The important town of Borcovicus, where these remains w^ere
found, was held by a cohort of Tung-rians. At Chesters
{(Murmim), another town on the line of the wall, held by
Asturians from Spain, a sculptured slab of stone was found,
which is supposed also to refer to the worship of Mithras.*
Hodgson has hazarded the following description and explanation
of it : — 'The sculpture is in two compartments: that on the
left seems to contain a lion, statant, raising the head of a naked
and dead man; that on the right, a figure of Mithras seated on
a bench, and having a flag in one hand, a wand [or sceptre] in
tlie other, and on its head the Persian tiara (?). I would hazard
a conjecture that the whole relates to the Mithraic rites, called
Leontica ; for the lion, in the zodiac of the ancient heathens,
stood for Mithras, or the sun, which threw its greatest heat
upon the earth during its course through the constellation Leo.'
Monuments of the Mithraic Avorship are said to have been
found in Cambeck-fort in Cumberland ; and a portion of a
sculptured entablature of Mithras and the bull was found early
in the last century at Chester. But the most perfect of these
monuments yet seen in Britain was one found at York, and still
preserved in the vestibule of the museum of that city. An
engraving of it is given in Mr Wellbeloved's ' Eburacum.' It
represents Mithras stabbing the bull, with all the usual attend-
* Engravings of these altars and sculptures will be found in Bruce' s
' Roman Wall.' On the monuments of the worship of Mithras, see Von
Haiimier's ' Mithriuca,' and especially the French work of M. Lajard ou
this subject.
CHAP. X.] SERAPIS; THE XYMPIIS. 320
atit fip,'ures. It is supposed tliat the spot where tliis very
iiit(3restiiig- niouuineut was discovei-ed was the site also of a
Mithraic cave, where the rites of the Persian deity Avere per-
formed by the ancient citizens of Eburacum.
At York also has been found a monument commemorative
of one of the deities of ancient Egypt. It is a large slab,
Avith an inscription dedicating a temple to Serapis, in the fol-
lowing words : —
DEO . SAXCTO To the holy God
SERAPi Serapis,
TEMPLVM . Aso this temple from the
LO . FECIT ground made
CL . HIERONY Claudius Hierony-
MiANVS . LEG mianus, legate
LEG . VI . VIC of the sixth legion, called the victorious.
It is not necessary here to speak of the prominent place lield
by the god Serapis among the objects of worship in imperial
Eome, and w^e are not surprised to lind that a temple was
dedicated to him in almost the hrst city in Eoman Britain. If
we had a few more of the altai's and other religious monuments
which have been destroyed, or are yet buried under the sod,
we should, no doubt, trace his worship in other parts of Britain.
An altar dedicated lovi serapi (to Jupiter Serapis) has been
found at Appleby, in (Ximberland.
There was another class of Eoman deities wdiich -were, no
doubt, better understood by the Teutonic, and probably by the
Gallic races, because they bore a closer affinity to that popular
class of mythic beings which are represented by our elves and
fairies — the nymphs and genii. These are commemorated in
numerous altars found in this island. The nymphs presided
over groves and meadows, and especially over fountains. Close
l)y a spring of clear water overlooking the ancient station of
Habitancum {RmiKjham), Avas found an altar dedicated to the
nymphs of the spot in the following hexameter couplet : —
Somnio praimonitus miles hanc ponere jussit
Aram quaa Fabio nupta est uymphis veuerandis.
The writer Avas evidently more anxious to preserve the measure
of his verse than to make himself intelligible, and the sense
intended to be conveyed is far from clear Mr Bruce has
ottered two explanations. ' Taking nupta est to signify dedi-
cated, a peculiar use of the Avord, suggested perhaps by its
X
330 THE ROMANS. [chap. x.
etymological relationship with the one which it governs.
uj/Mphis, the inscription will read — "A soldier, warned in a
dream, directed the erection of this altar which is dedicated
by Fabius to the nymphs to whom worship is dne." The other
method, of rendering it is the follownig: — -"A soldier, warned
in a dream, directed her (earn supplied) who is married to
Fabius, to erect this altar to the nymphs to whom worship is
due." According to either interpretation tlie altar was erected
to the sylphs of the fountain in consequence of a dream.' An
altar found near Chester {Beva), to the east of the town, on a
spot abounding in springs, bore the inscription : —
N'YMPHIS
To the nymphs
ET
and
FONTIBVS
fountains,
LEG XX
the twentieth legion,
V V
the valiant and victorious,
It reminds us of the poets description of ^Eneas, who, when he
had reached an unknown land,
Nymphasque et adhuc ignota prccatur
Fluniina.
Tlie nymphs and kindred deities were, in fact, regarded by th(i
Homans with extreme reverence, not less than that shown by
tlie Germans to their popular deities, which has not been
entirely eradicated from the minds of the peasantry even at the
])resent day. Another altar dedicated to the nymphs was found
at Nether Croy, in Scotland; and at }i\itch.estei' (Findobala),
one was dedicated to a kindred class of deities, the gods of the
mountains. The gods of the fields have also their altars, and
in one, found at Castle Hill, on the wall of Antoninus, they are
identified with Britain. —
CAMPES To the field deities
TRiBYs ET and the deities
BRiTAXNi of Britain,
Q piSENTivs Quiutus Pisentius
ivsTvs PREF Justus, prefect
coH nil GAL of the fourth cohort of Gauls,
V s LL M performs his vow most willingly
and dutifully.
Even the roads had their deities ; an altar preserved in a muti-
lated state at Tretire, in Herefordshire, on the borders of the
great Koman iron district, was dedicated, apparently, to the
CHAP. X.]
THE GENII.
331
0-0(1 who presided over cross roads, deo
perfect altar, found at Gretabridge, in
Ibllowing inscription : —
trimi ; and a more
Yorkshire, had the
DEO QUI VIAS
ET SEMITAS COM
MEXTVS EST T IR
DAS S C E V LL M
a VARIVS VITA
LIS ET E COS ARAM
SACRAM RESTI
TVIT
APRONIANO ET BRA
DVA COS
To the ^od who ways
and paths has de-
vised, Titus Ir-
das performed a holy vow most
willingly and dutifully.
Quintus Varius Vi ta-
lis, beneficiary of the consul,
the holy
altar restored,
Apronianus and Bra-
dua being consuls.
The altar erected by Titus Irdas having- become dilapidated,
Quintus Yarius Vitalis appears to have caused another to be
made in its place; he may have been a relative of the first
dedicator. Apronianus and Bradua were consuls in the year
191. An altar has been found in the neighbourhood of
Hadrian's Wall dedicated to the gods who preside over cidtiva-
tion, dls cultorihiis.
The genii were a somewhat different description of divinities,
having each a peculiar object entrusted to his care. We have
seen how, even when a man opened a shop or established a
trade, he began by propitiating tlie genius of the place on
which he settled. When ^neas arrived at the mouth of the
Tiber, he invocated genium loci. An altar found at Chester
was dedicated to the genius of the place for the health of the
two emperors (probably Diocletian and Maximian) ; and the
same genius occurs in more than one other instance on Roman
altars found in Britain. One of these, found in the camp at
Maryport, in Cumberland, and remarkable for its elaborate
ornamentation, is represented in the annexed cut. The inscrip-
tion must be read as follows : — ■
OENIO LOCI
rORTVNAE REDVCI
ROMAE AETERNAE
ET FATO BONO
G CORNELIVS
PEREGRIXVS
TRIB COHOR
EX PROVINCIA
MAVR CAESA
1>0M0 SE
To the genius of the place,
to fortune, who had brought him ba'^.k
to eternal Rome,
and to propitious fate,
Gaius Cornelius
Peregrinus,
tribune of a cohort,
from the province of
Mauritania Cassariensis
native of Se . , . .
!32
THE ROMANS
[chap, jl
The last line of the inscription, probably containing the
usual formula, V s L l m {votam solveus libeitti..'s8iiut iiierlto), luis
Roman Altar found at Maryport.
been entirely erased, and we have only two letters left of the
name of the town from which Peregrinus came ; perhaps it was
on the river Serbes.* ' Peregrinus,' observes Mr Bruce, ' ad-
dresses first the deity of the place over which his arms had
triumphed ; lest the local god should not smile benignantly, he
* The last remaining letters of tlie inscription have usually been ex-
plained domos e\yersos\ and supposed to refer to some buildings which tlie
tribune Peregrinus had restored, but the interpretation give i above is the
only one authorised by a comparison of other similar inscriptions.
I
CHAP. X.] THE GEXII. 333
resorts to Fortune, who had conducted him safely to the hind
of* his adoption. If this deity should fail him, he thinks to
find a refuge in the o-enius of the eternal city ; but, driven
from this resource, there is nothing' for it but to trust to fate or
chance.'
Besides the genii which presided over each particular locality,
there was a genius of each province of the empire, and a genius
of imperial Rome itself. At Auchindavy, in Scotland, were
found several altars, dedicated to different deities by a centurion
of the second legion, named Marcus Cocceius Firmus. On one
of these was the inscription : —
GEXIO
TERRAE
To the genius
of the land
RRITA
NNICAE
M COCCEI
of
Britain,
Marcus Cocceius
FjRMVS
0 LEG II AVG
Firmus,
centurion of the second legion,
the Augustan
Tlie pedestal of a statue, which probably represented a figure of
Britannia, was dug up at York in the nuddle of the last century,
with the inscription : —
r.RiTANNiAE To sacred
SANCTAE, Britain,
1' . NicoMEDES Publius Nicomedes,
AVGG .N.N of our two einperors
libertvs the freednian.
The two emperors were no doubt Severus and Caracalla.
At Whitby Castle, in Northumberland, an altar Avas dedi-
cated by the Nervii to the genius of Rome, genio Roma. At
Maryport, in Cumberland, was found another inscription,
KOMAE AETEKNAE ET EORTUNAE REDVCi. One at Ricchester
was dedicated, dea Roma, to the goddess Roma, A tablet was
found at Stanwicks, in the same county, with an inscription
which has been interpreted as follows : —
leg. VI. The sixth legion,
vie. P.r. the victorious, pious, and faithful,
G. p. r.f. to the genius of the Roman people
made (or erected) this
There were genii who presided even over palaces and public
Sci
THE ROMANS.
[CHAP. X.
offices. The fine altar represented in our cut, was found at
C'hesterholm (^Flndolana) ; it is ornamented with figures of the
Roman Altar found at Chesterholm (Vlndola)ta).
usual instruments of sacrifice, and with another object, which is
not so easily explained, and it may be observed that the focus,
or hollow at the top, was reddened by the action of the sacri-
ficial fire. The inscription is : —
GENIO
PRAKTOllI
SACKVM PI
TVANIVS SE
CVNDVS PllAE
VECTYS CHO nil
GALLOR
To the genius
of the prfetorium
sacred, Pi-
tuanius Se-
cundus prae-
fect of the fourth cohort
of Gauls.
An altar was found at Lanchester (Epiacum), dedicated to the
same genius by a tribune of the Lingones : —
CHAP. X.] THE GEXII. S25
GENIO PRAETORI To the g-pniu.^ of the pr.netjrium,
CL EPAPHRODiTVS Clfiudius Epiiphroditus
CLAVDIANVS Claudianus,
TRIBVNVS CHO tribune of the second cohort
. . I LING V L p M of Ling-ones, placed his vow
willingly and dutifully.
An altar Avas found at Caerleon (^Isca Silmvon^, dedicated to
tiie genius of tlie second le2;ion ; and one found in Nortli
Britain was dedicated to the genius of the first wing of
Spaniards, (/e7tio ala i. Hispanorum. Thus each pra3torium,
or quarters, and each troop, had its presiding genius. An
altar recently discovered at Chester has the still more curious
inscription : —
GEXio To the genius
AVERXi of Avernus,
IVL QViN Julius Quin-
TILIANVS tilianus.
which shows that even the presiding genius of the infernal
regions had his worshippers in Roman Britain.
The numen, or divinity, of the emperors, was also an object
of worship, and occurs rather frequently on altars. We have
already referred to examples in which the imperial niimiua were
combined with other deities. At Chester, an altar was found
dedicated numini AkcjusU, to the deity of Augustus. The
dedication, mimmibus Avgustl, is common on altars found in
different places in Northumberland. One found at Risingham
was dedicated by tlie fourtli coliort of Gauls, luiviinihtis Aiigiis-
tonoii, which is supposed by Horsley to refer to Sever us and
Caracalla, and by others to Caracalla and Geta. An altar,
found also at Risingham, which will be given further on, is
dedicated, nnuilui dom'mi nostrl Angnsti, to the divinity of
our lord the Augustus. Another, found in Cumberhnnd, has,
nummi Imperatoris Alexandrl August i, to the divinity of the
emperor Alexander the Augustus, referring to Alexander Severus,
who held the empire from 222 to 235. In an inscription found
at Hexham, in 1726, the emperor, supposed to be Commodus,
is spoken of as, pr absent Issivium nnmoi del. ^
Numerous altars have been found dedicated to Fortune, who
seems to have been a popidar deity among the towns of Roman
Britain. AVe have one on the line of the wall of Antoninus,
ill Scotland, dedicated conjointly by detachments of the second
and sixth legions. An altar, dedicated to the same goddess by
a centurion of the sixth legion, occurs at Chesterholm (^Flndo-
laua), in Northumberland. A lady, whose father belonged to
336 . THE ROMANS. [chap. x.
the second legion, dedicated an altar to Fortune, at the head-
quarters of the sixth leg-ion at Eburacum (York). This monu-
ment, which may still be seen in the York museum, has the
inscription ; —
DEAE
To the goddess
FORTVNAE
Fortune,
SOSIA
Sosia
IVNCIXA
Jimcina,
F ANTONI
daughter of Antonius
ISAVRICI
I?auricus,
LEG AVG
of the Augustan legion,
An altar at Netherby was dedicated by the Spaniards, dea
sanct(2 TortimfB, to the sacred goddess Fortune. On an altar
at Whelp Castle, in Westmoreland, she is reverenced as For-
tima servatrlx. One at Manchester was dedicated, Fc7'tiince
conservatricl ; and on several altars the goddess is worshipped
as Fortuna rednx. An altar at Chester was dedicated con-
jointly to Fortuna redux, JEsculapius, and Salus. One found
at Chesterliolm {Vindolana), was dedicated, fortmice popidi
Romani, to the fortune of the Koman people. But the most
interesting of all the inscriptions to this goddess is one found
at Bowes in Yorkshire {Lavatra), which was raised by the
celebrated pro-praetor, or governor of Britain, Virius Lupus: —
DEAE FORTVNAE To the goddess Fortune,
viRivs Lvpvs Virius Lupus,
LEG AVG PR PR legate of Augustus, proprietor,
BALiNEVM VI the bath, by force
IGNIS EXVST of fire burnt,
VM COH I THR of the first cohort of the
ACVM REST Thracians, restored,
ITVIT CVRAN under the care
TE vAL FRON of Valerius Fronto,
TONE PRAEF praefcct
Ea ALAE VETTO of the wiug of horse of Vottones.
Victory was no less favourite a deity with the Eomans in
Britain than Fortune. A large sculptured figure of this goddess
has been found at Housesteadsin Northumberland (Borcovicus).
An altar at Rough Castle in Scotland was dedicated to Victory
by the Nervii. Another, at Ribchester in Lancashire ( Coccium),
was dedicated to Mars and Victory. A sculptured figure of
Victory at Cambeck-fort in Cumberland bore the inscription
viCToiiiAE AVG, to victory of Augustus ; and the same words
occur in the dedicatory inscription of an altar found at Hex-
ham. At Benwell {Condercum), an inscribed slab, probably
PHAF. X.] MORAL DEDICATIONS. ??!
belon^-ing- to a temple, was found with the tbllowiug- dedicatory
inscription, in a label supported on each side by a winged
figure : —
vTCTOiaAE To Victory
. . . GG NN TE of our two Augusti {this) made
N s SENECio the nephew of Socius Senecio
N cos FELIX the consul, Felix,
ALAE I ASTO of the first wing of the Asturians
. . . M PRAE pruifect.
At Castlesteads, in Cumberland, was found an altar dedicated
DisciPViJNAE AVG, to the discipline of the Augustus. This is
an inscription which is found on several of the Koman imperial
coins. Virtues or moral principles were deified in the same
manner. We have seen before (p. 233) the god Bonus Eventus
commemorated in the tesselated pavement of a Eoman villa ;
at Binchester in Durham a nmtilated altar was found with an
imperfect inscription, to Mars and Bonus Eventus, hyf a tribune
of the tirst cohort of Cartovians (?) : —
TRiB COHOR I tribune of the first cohort
CARTOV .... of Cartov
MARTI viCTORl to Mars the victor,
GENio LOCI to the genius of the place,
ET BONO and to good
EVENT VI event.
An altar at Caerleon was dedicated to Fortune and Bonus
Eventus. An inscription was found at Elsdon in Northum-
berland, near the Watling Street, which Horsley reads as
follows : —
BONO GENERIS To the good of the
HVMAN IMPE human race,
RANTE CALPVR by Order of Calpur-
Nio AGRICOLA nius Agricola,
AVG PR PR PosviT the pi'opraetor of Augustus {this) placed
AC DEDiCAViT and dedicated,
c A ACiLivs Cams Aulus Acilius.
Calpurnius Agricola was proprietor of Britain under Antoninus ,
and the inscription was probably the dedication of the temple,
but I am not aware of any other instance in which the good of
the human race was deified. Not less singular is an inscribed
altar found at Kisingham {Ilahitancnm) to a goddess who is
supposed to be the personitication of the tertian ague : —
3;:8 THE ROMANS. [chai. x.
DEAR TER To the goddess
TIAN'AR SA Tertian
CRVM AKL sacred, ^lius
TIMOTHEA p Tiinothea placed it,
/ s LL M performing a vow most
willingly and dutilally.
At Ccirvorau a small altar was found, dedicated deae
EPONAE — to tlie goddess Epona, who presided over mules and
stables ; the favourite deity of the gay jockey in Juvenal
{Sat. viii. 155), —
Intcrea dum lanatas torvumque juvencum
More Niimae ciedit Jovis ante altaria, jurat
Solam Eponam et facies olida ad pr;esepia pictas.
Some of tlie (ledicators, not content Avith invoking one deity,
endeavoured to include them all under one invocation. Tlius
a prefect of tlie Dalmatian coliorljit Ellenborough, dedicated
an altar collectively to the gods and goddesses, dm (Jeahns'pir.
Another altar found at Chesters {Cil/inuuj/), was dedicated to
Apollo 'and all the deities,' d&o JpoUuil ei owuibns nunn-
iilhioi. There has been found also in the neighbourhood ot
Hadrian's wall an altar inscribed, deabus onutlbiis, to all the
goddesses.
We now come to a class of divinities which have a peculiar
interest in connection with the early history of our island, the
deities of the auxiliary races who formed so important an
element of its population. Among these we must place, first,
a class of deities commonly known by the title of the dere
matres. Altars and inscriptions to these deities are very numer-
ous in Belgic Ganl and Germany, and more especially along
the banks of the Ehine, where they are often called viatroiup
instead of matres, and they seem to have belonged to the
Teutonic race. Not more than one altar to these deities has, I
believe, been found in Italy, and we do not trace them in the
classic writers. When the de(S matres are figured on the altars
or other monuments, they are always represented as three
females, seated, with baskets or bowls of fruit on their knees,
which were probably emblematical of the plenty which they
were believed to distribute to mankind. ]\\ the accompanying
representation of the npper part of an altar preserved in the
museum at Cologne, the group of the three goddesses has
suffered less injury than is nsually the case with such monu-
metits.
We are fortunately enabled in this instance to identii'v the
niAT. X.]
THE DE.E iMATUES.
389
people to wliom these deities belong-ed, for it is an iiiterestiiiii;
fact that tlie reverence for the three goddesses who presided
over the wood? and fields, pre-arranged the fates of individuals,
MATPvONIS
AFLIABV^
The Deae Matres, from the altar at Cologne.
and dispensed the blessings of Providence to mankind, may be
traced down to a comparatively late period both in Germany
and England. Among the slight and contemptuous notices- of
Germanic paganism by the Christian writers of the earlier ages
after the conversion of the Teutonic tribes, we find allusions to
the conjoined images of three deities, but not sufficiently
explicit to allow us to identify them completely with those
which remain on the Roman altars. When, in the sixth
century, Columbanus and St Gall arrived at Bregenz {Brigan-
tlam), in Switzerland, they found that the people there paid
adoration to three images placed together against the wall of
their temple.* Probably this was a monument of the dece
matres in their original country. But it is among the popuhir
* Trcs ergo iniarjhies sereas et deauratas superstitiosa gentilitas ibi
Qo\chi\\.—Aiion. Vit. IS. Gal. — Repererunt autem in templo trcs imagines
wreas deauratas parieli affixas, quas populus .... adorabat. — WalaJ'rid
Strabo, Vit. S. Gal.
340 THE ROMANS. [chap, x
superstitious that we shall find the most distiuct allusion to the
three personages, who are looked upon often as three wood-
nymphs, and who are characterized by the same appellations, of
domhia^ matronce, dames, houiies dames, &c., which Ave find on
the Roman monuments.*
They are sometimes regarded as the three Fates — the Noj-ni
of the north, the wo'lcyrian of the Anglo-Saxons (the weird
sisters, transformed in Shakespeare into three witches), disposing
of the fates of individuals, and dealing out life and death. But
they are also found distributing rewards and punishments,
giving wealth and prosperity, and conferring fruitfulness. They
are the three fairies, who are often introduced in the fairy
legends of a later period, with these same characteristics. In a
story of the Italian Pentamerone, ire fate (three fairies) are
described as residing at the bottom of a rocky dell, and as con-
ferring gifts upon children who went down into it. In the
collection of superstitions condemned by Burchard, bishop of
Worms, who died in 1024, we are told that the German women
of his time had the custom, at certain times of the year, of
spreading tables in their houses with meat and drink, and
laying three knives, that if the three sisters should come (whom
Burchard interprets as being equivalent to the Roman Parcse),
they might partake of their hospitality. f These were the later
fairy women who visited people's houses by night, and whose
benevolence was thus conciliated. In the older legends, the
fairies are most commonly thi-ee in number. In later German
tales, we have sometimes three females occupied in spinning,
described as hateful old women ; sometimes they are old women,
but not engaged in this occupation ; in another story, they are
two young Avomen sitting spinning, and a third, the Avicked one,
bound below. In one instance, on a Roman altar, the middle
figure seems to be bound. Instances of most of these Avill be
found in the Kinder -Mar chen, and in the Deutsche Sagen, of the
Grimms. It may be observed that the Norni and the wselcyrian
Avere represented sitting and spinning. When Fridlaf went to
* It was a feeling of dread in the popular superstition of the middle
ages not to call such beings by their particular names ; and the same senti-
ment exists still in Ireland, and even in some remote parts of England,
Avhere the peasantry dai-e not call the elves and fairies by any other name
than Ihe respectful title of the good people, the ladies, &c.
t Fecisti ut qua^dani mulieres in quibusdam teniporibus anni facere
Solent, ut in domo sua mensam praeparares et tuos cibos et potum cum
tribus cultellis supra mensam poneres, ut si venissent tres ilke scn'on s qua^
antiqua posteritas et antiqua stultitia Parcas nominavit, ibi reticerentur.
CHAr. X.] THE FATES AXD NYMniS. 341
consult the oracle of the fates, he saw, withm the temple, three
neata, occupied by three ni/uiphs,^ each of whom conferred a ^-I'ft
npon liis sou Olaf, two of them givinp; good gifts and the third
an evil one.
At the beginning of the eighth centnrv, according to a pious
legend, a Worcestershire swine-herrl, forcing his way tlirougli the
dense thickets of the forests which then covered that part of the
island, in search of a stray swine, came suddenly to a fair open
lawn, in the midst of which he saw three beautiful maidens, cKid
in heavenly garments, and singing sweetly, one being snperior
to the otheis ; (avc have here the distinction constantly observed
in Ihe traditionary legends between two of the goddesses and
the third ;) he told his story to the bishop, Egwin, Avho accom-
panied him to the spot, and was also favoured with the vision.
Egwin decided at once that it was the Yirgin Mary, accompanied
by two angels ; and he built on the spot a monastery, which
was afterwards famous by the name of Evesham. f The vision is
represented on tlie old abbey seal. In all probability the site
of Evesham had been a spot dedicated by the nncon verted
Saxons to the worship of the three goddesses, and Egwin had
seized the popular legend to consecrate it for a Christian estab-
lishment.
A Latin poet of AYinchester, the monk Wolstan, who lived in
the middle of the tenth century, has left us a singular story
relating to the three nymphs who presided over that district, and
whom, differing in this from Egwin, but agreeing with the gen-
erality of ecclesiastical writers when they handled the popular
superstitions, he has blackened both in person and character. A
citizen of Winchester one day went out to visit his farm, and
returning somewhat late towards his home, near the little stream
which passes by the city, he was stopped by two dark women
in a state of nudity —
* Mos erat antiquis super futuris liberorum eventibus Parcarum oracula
consultare. Quo ritu Fridlevus Olavi filii fortunam exploraturus, iiuncu-
patis solenniter votis, deorum sedes precabundus accedit, ubi introspe(;to
sacello ter>ias sedes totidem mjmphis occupari cognoscit. Quaruui prima
induli^cntioris animi liberalein puero fonuani, uberemque huniani favoris
copiaiu erogabat. Eidem secunda beneficii loco liberalitatis excellentiani
condonavit. Tertia vero protervioris ingenii invidentiorisque studii foeinina
sororuin indulgentiorem aspernata ccnsensuiu, ideoque earuin donis ofticere
cupiens, tuturis pueri nioribus pursiinoniHe criiueu affixit. — Saxo Gram-
maticus, lib. vi. p. 102.
t MS. Cotton, Nero E, I. fol. 26, v", wlicre the story is told by bishop
Egwiu himself.
342 THE ROMANS. [chap. x.
Nam prope praefatum solus dum pergeret ainnpn\,
Haud procul aspiciens furias videt ecce geiuellas
Ante suaiu faciem, nullo velamine tectas,
Sed piceas totas obsceno nt corpore nudas,
Crinibus horrendas furvis et vultibus atras,
Armatas g-elido serpentinoque veneno.
Quae super extremam praedioti fluminis undam
Ceu geininae externis furium sedere sorores.
Quae mox ut coram sese properantor euntem
Conspexere virum, surgunt, et coniinus illi
Occurrunt, et eum pariter hac voce salutant :
' Frater amande, veni ; nostras adtende loquelas ;
Hue celer appropia, volunius quia pauca loquendo
Verba referre tibi : tu stans ea protinus audi.'
JFolstani Mirac. S. Sivithttui, MS. Reg.
15 C, vii. fol. 74, v°.
The man, instead of paying due respect to the hidies by
listening to them, ran away in a fright, and they pursued him,
threatening vengeance for the disregard which he had shown to
their commands — •
Cur, insane, fugis ? quo, jam inoriture, recurris ?
Non nos incolumis, miser, evasisse valebis,
Sed nobis spretis borrenda pericla subibis.
He now gave himself up for lost, and his terror was increased
when a third female, who had lain concealed on the hill, stopped
his way. — It is not improbable that these nymphs haunted
the deserted fortress of the pagans of old, and the barrow-
covered downs which still overlook this ancient city, from which
their worship had then been banished by the influence of the
gospel.
Tertia progreditur veniens a vertice coUis,
Terribilis vultu proceraque corpore vasto,
Usa tamen niveo pictoque decenter amictu,
Dissimilisque habitu vultuque prioribus extans.
Haec etenim latuit post collem fraude reperta,
Propter iter per quod cupiit transire viator
Quatinus hunc caperet, furvis si intactus abiret.
In her angry mood, the third nymph struck the inobedient
mortal senseless to the ground, and then they disappeared in
the waters of the river —
Nee mora, cum furiis linquens abscessit in amnis
Gurgite, praecipiti saliens ac praepete saltu.
Tlie man graduallv recovered his senses, but he found hiniseir
CHAP. X.] THE DEiE MATRES. 343
a cripple, and with dirticiilty crawled to the eastern gate of tlie
city, which was not far distant.
Another Ang-lo-Latin poet, but who lived in the latter half
of the twelfth century, Nigellus Wireker, has preserved in his
Speculum Stdtorum, a tale which furnishes a still more remark-
able illustration of the character of the three goddesses when
they had become mere personages of mediieval popular fable.
Nigellus still compares them with the Latin Parcce. The three
sisters, he says, went out into the woi'ld to relieve men from
their troubles and misfortunes — ^'
Ibant tres liominum curas lelevare sorores,
Quas nos fatales diciiiius esse deas.
Unus erat cultus tribus his eadeiiique voluntas,
Naturae vitiis ferre salutis opem ;
Et quod avara minus dederat, vel prodiga multuin,
His emendandis pluriina cura fuit.
As they went along, they found, mider a shady bank, a
beautiful maiden, of a noble family, and rich in the goods of
the world, yet, in spite of all these advantages, she was weeping
and lamenting. Two of the sisters proposed to relieve her of
her grief, but the third opposed their desires, and gave them a
short lecture on the ill uses some people make of prosperity.
' Venimus, ut nostis, nos tres invisere munduni,
Ut ferremus opem, sed qui bus esset opus.
Non opus est isti, quia quam natura beavit
In quantum potuit, et quibus ansa fuif,
Cui genus et speciem formae tribuit specialem,
Debet id et nobis et satis esse sibi.
Forsitan auxiliuni si praestaremus eidem,
I'osset de facill deteriora pati.'
They left the weeping damsel, and proceeded to a shady wood,
M'here lay another maiden on a couch : she, like the former, was
beautiful and intellectual, and, as it appears, like her, also rich ;
but she was lame of her lower extremities, and, unable to walk,
she had been brought thither to enjoy the green shade. She
courteously addressed the three nymphs, and showed them the
way to the most beautiful part of the wood, where a pleasant
fountain gave rise to a clear stream. The two sisters now pro-
posed to relieve the damsel of her infirmity, but the third again
* The extracts froa. iLis poc;;., tuiven rioui au old printed eait.on, are
compared with a copy in MS. Harl., No. 2422.
:m THE ROMANS. [CHAP. x.
iuterposc'dj on tlie ground that the Lidy enjoyed advantages
sutiicient to overbahmce this one inconvenience under which she
Jaboured, and whicli were granted to few of those who ai'e made
perfect in their limbs. The nymphs again passed on, and,
towards evening, were proceeding towards a town, Avhere, not far
outside the gates, they saw a rustic girl, wlio, unacquainted Avith
the delicacies of more cultivated life, performed an act in public
which shocked the two nymphs who had shown so much com-
passion on the former occasions. The third nymph drew the
others back.
Erubuere duae, visum vultumque tegentcs,
Vestibus objectis, arripuere fugam.
Tertia subsistens, revocansque duas fugientes,
'Ut quid,' ait, ' fugitis Y siste, quaeso, gra Una.'
She shows them that they have here really an occasion of
bettering the condition of one who enjoyed none of the advan-
tages of fortune, and they determine to give her all sorts of
riches, and to make her the lady of the town.
' Quodque nequit fieri, naturani degonerare
Nolumus, injustas non decet esse deas.
Res et opes adjici possunt, extraque liniri
Naturae salva proprietate sua.
Nos igitur quibics est super his collata 2)otestas,
Denius abundanti munera magna manu,
Divitias et opes, census, fundos, et honoves,
Praidia, montana, pascua, prata, greges ;
Urbis et istius dominam statuamus eaudem,
Ut nihil in nostro muuere desit ei.'
It may be observed that, from the Pojnitentiale of Baldwin
bishop of Exeter, the contemporary of Nigellus Wireker, who
composed this work for the use of his own diocese, it would
appear then to have been the common practice in England,
to lay the table with three knives (at night, of course) to con-
ciliate these three personages, that they might confer good gifts
on chddren born in the house.*
In a fabliau of the thirteenth century, of so indelicate a
character that we cannot even mention its title, the three god-
desses appear in the character of three beautiful fairii^s bathing
* Qui mensam prajparavit, cum tribns cultellis in famulatum por-
sonarum, ut ibi nascentibus bona prtedestinent. — Liber Foenitent. Baldw
rsraui Evisc. MS. Cotton. Faustiu<« A. viij., tH. 32, r°.
CHAP. X.] THE DE^ MATRES. 34o
in a fountain, and are still endowed with the same quality of
conferring benefits. There was a beautiful shady fountain in
the midst of a fair meadow.
En la fontaine se baignoient
Tfois puceles preuz et senees,
Qui de biaute .^ernbloient fees ;
Lor robes a tout lor chemises
Orent desor un arbre mises.
A knight passing that way, very ungallantly seizes upon their
dresses ; but softened by their urgent entreaties, he restores
them. In return for this courtesy, each of them confer a gift
upon him : the gift of the first was that he should be received
into favour wherever he went ; that of tlie second was, that he
should ahvays be successful in his suits to the ladies; and the
third, who hei'c again appears as giving something totally con-
trary in character to that of her two companions, conferred a
gift which cannot easily be named. In a manuscript in the
British Museum (MS. Harl. No. 2253), there is a different
version of this fabliau, which seems to be the one current in
England at the begiiming of the fourteenth century ; in it the
scene of the nymphs bathing is thus described : —
Ce fust en este quant la flour
Verdist e dount bon odour,
E les oylsels sunt chauntanz,
E demenent solas graunz.
Come il ererent en une pleyne,
Qe ert delees une fonteyne,
Si virent un petit russhel,
Auke petit, nies molt bele ;
Yleque virent treis damoiseles,
Sages, oortoises, e tresbeles,
Qu'en la russhele se bagnerent,
Se desduront e solacerent.
Eoman monuments commemorative of the de^ mntres are by
no means uncommon in Britain. The lower portion, much
damaged, of a large sculpture of the dese matres was found in
digging to the Eoman level in Hart-street, in the City of
London, and a good and correct engraving of it is given in Mr
Eoach Smith's ' (lollectanea Antiqua.' It is now in the Guild-
hall. Monuments of the three goddesses have been met with
at Ancaster and at Lincoln. An altar dedicated to them has
been found at York ; and more northwardly, especially in the
M'all districts, where the Teutonic race predominated, tliey are
S46
THE ROMANS.
[chap.
X.
Very common. At Bincliester, in Durham {Finovluvi), an altar
was found dedicated deab matkib q, l o, which has been inter-
preted deabu8 matrihm qua locum occupant, to the dese matres
wlio occupy the place. This was in accordance with the popular
belief of the Germans, that every place had its presiding-
Altar found at Risingliani {HahitancuDi).
mothers. An altar found at Eisingham, and represented in
the annexed cut, is dedicated to the transmarine mothers, by
one who preferred the presiding deities of his native land : —
MATRiBV To tLe mothers
8 TRAMA transmarine,
RiNis IVL Julius Victor
VICTOR . V . s . L . M performs a vow willingly and dutifully.
The cone, which is introduced on this altar, is generally con-
sidered to have been an aphrodisiac emblem, and the ornaments
round it seem to indicate rather a late date — they resemble
tliose on some of the late Eoman pottery.
An altar found at Brougham, in Westmoreland, was dedicated
to the transmarine mothers by a vexillation of Germans, which
is a further indication of the country to which these deities
belong : —
DEABVS MATRIRVS
TRAMAR VEX GERMA
NORVM PRO SALVTE
lil' V S L M
To the g'oddess mothrrs
transmarine, the vexillation of
Germans, for the safety
of the state, perform a vow willinjjly
and dutifully.
cirA?. X.] THE DE-E MATRES. 347
A broken tablet found near Old Penrith, in Cumberland, was
inscribed by a vexillation, of which the name of the country is
lost, to the transmarine mothers, in conjunction with the em-
peror, Alexander Severus, and his mother, Mammaea : —
DEAUVS MATRIBV8 THAMARINIS
ET N IMP ALEX AND HI AVG ET IVL MAM
MEAE MATR AVG N ET CASTRORVM TO
TI . . . . DOMVI DIVINAE AE
.... LATIO ....
An altar found at York, with a somewhat difficult inscription,
has been interpreted as dedicated, viatribus Jfricls, Itallcis,
GaUlcis, to the mothers of Africa, Italy, and Gaul; but this
interpretation is rather doubtful. Anotlier inscription found in
Enghnid i^oes still further; it is a dedication, vicdrlbns onnuinn.
(jentlum, to the mothers of all nations. An altar found at
Stanwicks, in Cumberland, was dedicated to the domestic
mothers, matribus domestlcls. Another, found at Cramond, in
Scotland, was dedicated by the first cohort of Tiuigrians to the
mothers of Alaterva and of the fields, matribus Alatervls et
matribus campestribus. A slab found at Benw^ell {Condercum)
commemorates the erection of a temple to the mothers of the
fields — matribus campestribus — by tiie prefect of the first wing- of
Asturians from Spain. Curiously enough, an altar found at the
same place, and which had, perhaps, been placed in the temple,
was dedicated, to the three deities under the title of lamice,
denoting their noxious qualities, lamits tuibvs. Other altars,
dedicated dlis Matribus, have been found at llibchester, South
Shields, &c. ; and one at Binchester, with the inscription
MATRiBVS SACiivM. Broken sculptures of the deje matres have
l)een found at Netherby, and at other places in the north.
Mr Roach Smith has given examj)les from Germany, of
dedications viatrouis AJliabus (the one engraved in our cut
on p. 339), MaJdinehis, Hamavehis, Ruiiia)ichabus, matribus
Treveris, and a great many others, which are evidently named
from places ; and he remarks that ' it will be observed, that
wliile in Germany the adjective always represents tlie locality,
in those found in England it is merely a general epithet, as
tliougli the divi.iities addressed were those of strangers to the
country.'
The worship of the German or other colonists, as far as it
was derived from their native countries, seems to have been
348
THE ROMANS.
[chap. X.
<>enerally directed to tliose popular deities wliicli were not known
to them by distinctive names. Tlie names of the gods appear
to have been regarded as too sacred to be entrusted to every
tongue. Hence, in almost all cases where Ave can trace the
origin of the names of such deities on altars in Roman Britain,
they are fonnd to be derived from the names of places, from
whence probably the dedicators derived their origin. There are,
however, one or two exceptions of names of foreign deities,
which, from their frequent recurrence, must have belonged to a
national mythology. Thus, in the north of England, sevei-al
altars have been found dedicated to a god whose name appears
to have been Veteres, Vetires, or Vetiris. At Netherby, in
Cumberland, which appears to have been occupied by Dacians,
two altars have been found, one dedicated deo vetiri sancto,
the other deo mogonti vitires. At Lanchester, in the county
of Durham, a small altar bore the simple inscription deo vit.
Another found at Ebchester, in the same county, on one side of
which was the figure of a boar, and on the other that of a toad,
had the following inscription : —
DEO
VITIRI
To the g-od
Yitires
MAXIMV
S V S
Maximus
performs a vow
Two altars of the same deity had been found at Ben well
{Condercimi), in both of which he is distinguished by the
Roman Altar found at Ben well {Condercum).
ciiAr. x] THE GOD VITIRES. 349
epithet sanctus, or lioly ; on the first, which is represented in
the accoinpanyiiio; cut, the inscription is merely deo vetki
SANCT, to the lioly god Vetris. This altar has the usual figures
of the implements of sacritice. The other has the figure of a
liog, with the inscription vitirb v s, which is either tntirbus, or
vltlrb votiim solvit. The station at Benwell was occupied by
Asturians. An altar at Tliirlwall Castle, also on Hadrian's
wall, was dedicated deo sancto vetei?!. Three altars to this
god have been found at Carvoran {Magna), Avhich was occupied
by Dalmatians. The inscription on one was : —
DEO
To the god
VITIRI
Vitires
MEN I
Menius
DADA
Dnda
V S L M
lultilled a vow willingly and dutifully
A second had an inscription, of which the commencement was
DEO vitirine . . . , the two last letters of which may be tlie
commencement of another word, though, I think, there has also
been found an altar dedicated deo veterino. The third of the
Carvoran altars bore the inscription : —
DiRUS To the rustic gods
viTiRiBVS Vitires,
DECcivs Deccius
V . s . L . M performs a vow willingly and dutifully.
I translate it according to a suggestion which has been made
that the first line should be read, dlis rustlcis. On some other
altars the name is in the plural, veterlbus, and veterubus. As
the altars were dedicated apparently by people of widely differ-
ent countries, they give us no assistance in appropriating this
deity. The word has been supposed to be identical with
Vithris, one of the names of the northern Odin, the Woden of
the Germans.
Another deity, whose altars are found chiefly in Cumberland,
where they are numerous, was named Belatucadrus ; by which
name, without any epithet, a small altar found at Ellenborough
was dedicated by Julius Civilis. Several other altars dedicated
to this deity have been found at Netherby, Castlesteads,
Burgh-on-the-Sands, Bankshead, and other places. In some
instances, as in an altar found at Druinburgh, the deity is
addressed by the epithet, deo sancto belatvcadro. In some
altars he is identified with Mars, as on one found at Plumpton
350 tup: ROMANS. [cHAr. x.
Wall, dedicated deo marti belatvcadi?! et nvminib augg.
Several attempts have been made to derive the name from
Hebrew, Welsh, or Irish, and it has been hastily tahen for
granted that this god was identical with the Piioeuician Baal.
.Altars to Belatncadnis have been found at Kirby Thore, at
AVhelpcastle, and at Brougham, in Westmoreland. The one at
]^rougliam was dedicated by a man named Andagus, which
sounds like a Teutonic name.
In Cumberland also are found rather frequently altars dedi-
cated to a god named Cocideus or Cocidius. Tour were found
at Bankshead and Howgill. One at Netherby — dedicated deo
SANCTO cociDio — gives him the same epithet which has been
before applied to Yetires and Belatucadrns. He is also identi-
lied with Mars in an inscription at Lancaster, deo sancto
MARTI COCIDIO, as well as in another found at Old Wall, in
Cumberland. The latter was dedicated by a soldier of the tirst
cohort of Dacians. Of the two found at Bankshead, one was
dedicated by a soldier of the second legion, the other by one of
the sixth. An altar was found at Bewcastle dedicated sancto
cociDEO TAVRVNC. It is probable that somewhere in the neigh-
bourhood of Bankshead or Howgill there has been a temple
dedicated to this god, important enough to give its name to a
small town. The anonymous geographer of Eavenna mentions
a town in this part of the country which in the ordinary
printed text is called Fanocedi, but one of the manuscripts
gives Fanococidi, which is no doubt the correct reading. The
place was called Fanuni Cocidi, from the temple of the deity.
An altar to Cocidius at Netherby was dedicated by a tribune of
the first cohort of Nervians.
Another deity, whose altars are found chiefly in Cumberland,
is called, in the dative case, Mogonti ; perhaps the nominative
was Mogonlis. An altar at Netherby, mentioned above, seems
to identify him with Vetires. The inscription at Old Penrith,
DEO MOGTi, is perhaps only an abbreviation of the name. The
name deo movnti, found on an altar at Plumpton Wall, is pio-
bably only another form. At Kisingham, in Northumberland.
{Ilabitancum), an altar Avas found with the inscription : —
MOGONT CAD To Mongontis Cad . . .
ET . N . D . N . AVG and the deity of our lord the Augiistus,
M . G . SECVNDINVS Marcus Gaius Secundinus,
«r . cos . HABiTA a beneficiary of the consul, at
xci PKIMA STA the first station of Habitancuin,
PRO SE ET svis I'os ])laced it for himself and his family.
CHAP. X.] GODS OF THE AUXILIARIES. 351
Another altar in the same place was dedicated deo movno cad.
Horsley supposes that 6W refers to the Caledonian tribe of the
Gadeni, which I think is at least very doubtful. It appears
that a cohort of Vangiones from Belgic Gaul was established
here.
A considerable number of names of gods are found on]>
once, and were, there can be little doubt, taken from the names
of places. Thus an altar discovered recently at York was
(h'dicated to a god named Arciaconus, probably from the town
of Arciaca, in Gaul : * —
DEO To the god
ARCIACOX Arciaconus,
ET N . AVG SI and to the divinity of the Augustus,
MAT VITALIS Simatius Vitalis
OKD V . s. M .... performs a vow dutifully.
A goddess Ancasta is mentioned on an altar found at Bittern,
in Hampshire, (Clausentum) : —
DEAE To the goddess
ANCA Ancas-
STAE G ta,
EMiNV Geminus
s MANTI Mantius
V s L M performs a vow willingly and dutifully.
AtBirrens, in Scotland, is a dedication to a goddess Brigan-
tia, with n winged figure of the deity, holding a spear in her
right hand, and a globe in the left. It was supposed that this
was the deity of the country of the Brigantes, but I am not
aware that this country was ever called Brigantia, and it is not
probable that the conqueror would worship the deity of a van-
(juislied tribe. I feel more inclined to suppose the name was
taken from Brigantium, in Switzerland, a town which occupied
the site of the modern Bregentz. An altar found at Chester
was dedicated deae nvmphae brig, which in this case would
be ' to the nymph goddess of Brigantium.'
An altar dedicated deo ceaiio, to a deity named Ceajius,
was found at Drumburgh, in Cumberland. One found at
* It has been remarked that in other provinces of the empire we find
deities characterised by similar appellations. Thus we have among the
inscribed altars found in the country on the Rhine, one dedicated ' Dete
Bibracte,' a name perhaps taken from the town of Bibracte, in Roman
Britain.
352 THE ROMANS. [chap. x.
Gretabridge, in Yorksliire, was dedicated drae IsYmphae
ELAVNAE, to the nvmpli goddess of Elauna. An altar found at
Plumpton Wall, in Cumberland, gave us the name of a god
called (jadunus. One found at Thirl wall, on the wall of
Hadrian, was dedicated to a dea Hammia, who is supposed by
Hodgson to have been named from Hamah, on the Orontes.
Perhaps, however, this goddess may have been named from the
Hamii, a tribe from the banks of the Elbe, who are found
stationed in this part of Britain. A goddess named Harimella
— DEAE HARIMELLAE — is mentioned in an inscription found at
Birrens, in Scotland. An inscription, deo hercvlenti, occurs
at E,ibchester ; and one to a goddess called Jalona is said to
have been found at the same place. An altar at Armthwaite,
in Cumberland, presented the following inscription to a god
Maponus, dedicated by Germans : —
DEO
To the god
MAPONO
Maponus,
ET N AVG
and to the divinity of the Augustus,
DVRIO
Durio
ET RAMI
and Rami
ET TRVrO
and Trupo
ET LVRIO
and Lurio,
GERMA
Germans,
NI V S L M
performed a vow willingly and dutifully
Another altar inscribed to this deity was found at Hexham.
An altar found at Elsdon, in Northumberland, is dedicated to
a god Matunus — deo matvno. A goddess named on an altar
found at Birrens, in Scotland, dea Ricagm . . . , is shown by the
inscription to have belonged to the Beda pagus, in Germany.
Mr Roach Smith, who first pointed out this fact, has also
suggested that a title given to Neptune in an inscription on an
altar found in the north of England, Neptuno Sarabo sino, may
be explained as referring to the Saravus, now the Sarr, a
tributary of the Moselle, commemorated in the lines of
Ausonius : —
Tuque per obliqui fauces vexate Saravi,
Qua bis terna fremunt scopulosis ostia pilis.
A dea Setlocenia is mentioned in an altar found at EUenborough,
in Cumberland. At llkey, in Yorkshire {OUcana), was found
an altar dedicated to Verbeia — verbeiae sacrvm. Lastly, a
CHAP. X.] GODS OF TEIE AUXILIAKIES. 3o3
<2:o(l(iess called Viradesthi appears on the altar at Birrens, dedi-
cated bv a Tungrian soldier : — ■
DEAE viRADES To the {^oddess Viradesthi
THi PAGVS CON PafTUS Condustris,
DvSTius MiLi a soldier in
IX COH II. TUN the second cohort of Tungrians,
GR SVB sivo under Sivus
AVSPICE PR Auspex,
AEFE the praefect.
Sucli is a ""eneral view of the character of the religious monu-
ments of the Roman period found in Britain. It cannot but
excite our astonishment that among such an immense number
of altars and inscriptions of temples, and with so many hun-
dreds of Eoman sepulchres and graves as have been opened in
this country, we find not a single trace of the religion of the
Gospel. We must bear in mind, moreover, that a large pro-
portion of these monuments belonged to a late period of the
Roman occupation ; in many of the inscriptions relating to
temples, the building is said to have been rebuilt, after having
fallen into ruin through its anticptity — vetustate collapsum ; and
the examination of more than one of the more magnificent
villas has proved that they Avere erected on the site of an older
villa, which had probably been taken down for the same reason.
We seem driven by these circumstances to the unavoidable
conclusion that Christianity was not established in Roman
Britain, although it is a conclusion totally at variance with the
preconceived notions into which we have been led by the eccle-
siastical historians.
The accounts of the supposed establishment of Christianity
in our island at this early period may be divided into three
classes. Pirst, we have a few allusions to Britain in the earlier
(/hristian writers, which must evidently be taken as little better
than fiourishes of rhetoric. Britain was the western extremity
of the known world, and when the z?alous preacher wished to
impress on his hearers or readers the widely extended success
of the gospel, he would tell them that it extended from India
to Britain, without considering much whether he was literally
correct in saying that there were Christians in either of these
two extremes. We must probably consider in this light certain
passages in Tertullian, Origen, Jerome, and others. In the
second class we must place the statements of certain ecclesiastical
writers who lived at no great length of time after the Roman
period. In the year 314, the emperor Constantine called the
/
354 THE ROMANS. [chap. x.
first ecclesiastical council, at Aries, to settle a dispute among-
the African bishops ; a list of the clergy who attended has been
preserved, and is printed in the Collections of Councils, but T
am not aware that it reposes upon any good authority ; in it
ai"e said to have come from Britain, Eborius, bishop of Ebura-
cnm (York) ; Eestitutus, bishop of London ; Adelfius, bishop of
Colotiia Loud'uiensimn ; Sacerdos the priest ; and Arminius the
deacon. I confess that the list looks to me extremely suspi-
cious, much like the invention of a later period. In the year
360, under the emperor Constantius, a council was called at
Ariminum {Rimini)^ in Italy, on account of the Arian contro-
versy, and it is said to have been attended by four hundred
bishops. The prelates assembled on this occasion were to be
supported at the public expense, but we are told by the eccle-
siastical historian, Sulpicius Severus, who wrote about forty
years afterwards, ' that this seemed unbecoming to the bishops
of Aquitaine, Gaul, and Britain, and they chose rather to live
at their own charge, than at the public expense. Three only
from Britain, on account of their poverty, made use of the
public provision ; for, though tlie other bishops offered to make;
a subscription for them, they thought it more becoming to be
indebted to the public purse, than to be a burthen upon indi-
viduals.' If this account be true, and three bishops really
went from Britain, they were perhaps only missionaries, whose
converts were too few and too poor to be able to support
them.*
A third class of authorities is mucb less valuable, and far
more extravagant. When the popes began to claim a sovereign
])ower, they were anxious to make it appear that the whole of
the western empire had been converted at an early period, and
had been deperulent on the Roman see. Eor this purpose,
legendary stories were invented which will not bear criticism.
Such were the stories of Joseph of Arimathea and St Paul,
who were each said to have planted Christianity in Britain not
long after the death of Christ. It need hardly be stated that
there is no authority for either of these legends. According to
a legend existing in the time of Bede, Lucius, king of the
Britons, in the year 156, wrote to the pope Eleutherius,
* It seems to me that the three names of British bishops pretended to
have been at the council of Aries, had been made to answer to the thre<»
bishops mentioned by Sulpicius Severus. I think it has not been yet sati.-*-
faotorily ascertained when the name Jh'ifaiuii was first applied to the
people of the country now called Breragne.
CHAP, x] CHRISTIANITY. 3.55
• beseeching him to issue a mandnte that he miglit be made a
Christian ; and afterwards he obtained the object of his pious
petition, and the Britons preserved immaculate and sound, in
peace and tranquillity, the faith Avhich they had received, until
tiie reign of the emperor Diocletian.' There are anachronisms
in this story which have furnished matter for much discussion ;
but the whole is quite as inconsistent with history, and with
what we know of the state of the island, as with chronology.
The story of king Lucius can be regarded as nothing more than
a Romish fable. The pretended persecution in Britain under
Diocletian is a kind of sequel to the history of king Lucius.
A persecution of the Christians is not likely to have taken place
under the orders of the tolerant Constantius, who was governor
of Britain when the persecution of Diocletian commenced, and
who became emperor two years later, and in another year left
his title to his son Constantine. The outline of the legend of
St Alban was probably an invention of the sixth century, at /
the latter end of which his name is mentioned by the poet ^
Tortunatus, who enumerates him among the blessed martyrs, —
Albanum egregium foecunda Britannia profert.
In the ' Biographia Britannica Literaria' (Anglo-Saxon period),
I have pointed out, I think, substantial reasons for doubting
the authenticity of the work attributed to Gildas, on which
chiefly our notions of the establishment of Christianity in
Eoman Britain are founded ; and the more I examine this book,
the more I am convinced of the correctness of the views I there
stated. If the authority of such writers be worth anything,
we mnst take it for granted that at least after the age of Con-
stantine, Eoman Britain was a Christian country ; that it was
filled with churches, clergy, and bishops, and, in fact, that
paganism had been abolished throughout the land. We should
imagine that the invaders, under whom the Roman power fell,
found nothing but Christian altars to overthrow, and temples of
Christ to demolish. It is hardly necessary to point out how
utterly at variance such a statement is with the result of anti- w
quarian researches. I have stated that not a trace of Chris-
tianity is found among the innumerable religious and sepulchral
monuments of the Roman period found in Britain.* One
* In considering questions of this kind we should avoid, as much as
possible, conjectures and suppositions, and accept nothing but absolute
tacts. Writers have at times taken for granted that certain modes of
interments, or forms of ornament, indicated the sepulchres of followers uf
'60b TIIK KOMANS. LcHAi'. v
solitary memorial of the religion of Ciirist has, however, been
found, and that under very remarkable circumstances. On the
principal tesselated pavement in the Roman villa at Frampton
in Dorsetshire, the Christian monogram (the x and p) is found
r in the midst of figures and emblems, all of which are purely
Pagan. Lysons, who published an engraving of this pavement,
attempted to explain this singular anomaly, by supposing that
the monogram of Christ had been added at a later period by a
Christian, who had become possessed of the old Pagan house.
Eut there seems to have beeii nC' a;}pea;ance in the work of the
pavement that it had been a subsequent insertion, and it must
b'.; agreed that a Christian of this period was not likely to be
so tolerant of heathenism, as to place a Christian emblem
among pictures and even inscriptions relating to that profane
mythology on which he was taught to look with horror, and
which he could not for a moment understand. I am inclined
to think it more probable that the beautiful Roman villa at
Frampton had belonged to some wealthy proprietor who pos-
sessed a taste for literature and philosophy, and with a tolerant
spirit which led him to seek to surround himself with the me-
morials of all systems, he had adopted among the rest that
which he might learn from some of the imperial coins to be the
emblem of Christ. Jesus, in his eyes, might stand on the same
footing as Socrates or Pythagoras.
We can understand, without difficulty, when we consider
that this distant province was, from its insular position, far
more independent of the central influence of the empire than
other parts, why the new faith was slow in penetrating to it,
and was not readily adopted. No doubt, among the recruits
who were sent to the Roman troops, and the strangers who
visited the island as merchants, or settlers, there must have
been individuals who had embraced the truths of the Gospel.
But we must bear in mind also, that the population of Britain,
during the later period of the Roman power, seems to have
been recruited more and more from, the Pagan tribes of Ger-
many and the North.
the gospel. Thus some have supposed that burial of the body without
cremation was an evidence of Christianity, which certainly is not the case.
Others have insisted that the presence of a wreath, or palm-branch, among-
the ornaments of sepulchral inscription, is a proof that it stood over the
body of a Christian. Before, however, we can take this for granted, we
must be satisfied that such an ornament could not be employed on a Pagan
monument.
CHAP, xi.l MODES OF SEPULTURE. 367
CHAPTER XL
Modes of Sepulture in Roman Britain — Cremation and Um-T3uriul — Modcis
of Interment — Burial of the Body entire — Sarcophagi — Coffins of
Baked Clay, Lead, and Wood — Barrows — Sepulchral Chambers —
Inscriptions, and their Sentiments — Various Articles deposited with
the Dead — Fulgor Divoni.
The burial customs of a people are closely allied to its
relig'ious belief; but tlie settlers in Roman Britain appear to
have adopted exclusively the Roman forms of sepidture. We
lesiirn from the ancient writers that it was the earlier practice of
the Romans to bury the body of their dead entire, and that it
was not till the time of the dictator Sylla that the custom of
burning the dead was established. From this time either usage
continued to be adopted, at the will of the individual, or of the
family of the deceased ; but in the second century of the
C'hristian era the older practice is said to have become again
more fashionable than that of cremation, and from this time it
gradually superseded it. We find that both modes of burial
were used indiscriminately in Roman Britain, and it is probable
that the different peoples who composed the Roman population
adopted that practice which was most agreeable to their own
prejudices. The practice of burning the dead and burying the -
ashes in urns seems, hoAvever, to have predominated.
The earliest code of the Roman laws, that of the Twelve
Tables, prohibited the burial or burniug of the dead within the
city, and it was only in rare instances that this prohibition was
evaded or transgressed. The same law was acted upon in the
towns of the provinces, A sepulchral interment, consisting of
a skeleton laid in a tomb of Roman tiles, was found a few
years ago in Green Street, in the very heart of the city of
London ; it formed an exception to the general rule in Roman
Britain, where, as in Italy, the cemetery w^as always placed
i^
358 THE ROMANS. [chap. xr.
outside tlie town, usually by the side of tlie roads wliicli led
from the principal g-ates. In the country we generally tind the
bnrial-places in the immediate neighbourhood of the villa or
of the hamlet.
When a Eoman had breathed his last, his body was laid out
and washed, and a small coin was placed in his mouth, which
it was supposed he would require to pay his passage in Charon's
boat. If the corpse was to be burnt, it was carried on the day
of the funeral in solemn procession to the funeral pile, which
was raised in a place set apart for the purpose, called the
ustrlmim. The pile, called rogus, or pyra, was built of the
most inflammable wood, differing in size according to the rank
or wealth of the individual ; and when the body had been
placed upon it, the whole was ignited by the relations of the
deceased. Perfumes and spirituous liquids were often poured
over it ; and objects of different kinds, which had belonged to
the individual when alive, were thrown into the flames. When
tlie whole was consumed, and the fire extinguished, wine was
scattered over the ashes, after which the nearest relatives
gathered what remained of the bones and the cinders of the
dead, and placed them in an urn, in which they were committed
to the grave. The site of the ustrinum has been traced, or
supposed to be traced, in the neighbourhood of several towns in
Roman Britain. A Roman cemetery, found at Litlingtou,
near Royston, is described in the twenty-sixth volume of the
' Archseologia ; ' it formed a square of nearly four hundred
feet, and the wall or boundary was distinctly traced. At two
of the corners, where there was no trace of interments, the
original level of the ground was covered with a great quantity
of ashes, which, no doubt, in each place, marked the site of
the ustrinum, or place set apart for burning the dead. I believe
the site of the tistr'mum has also been discovered outside the
walls of the Roman town of Isurium, at Aldborough, in York-
shire. W^e are told by Herodian that, on the death of Severus
at Eburacum, his sons caused his body to be burnt, and placed
the ashes with aromatics in an urn of alabaster, which they
carried with them to Rome. Persons of rank were burnt witli
greater ceremonies than were observed on ordinary occasions,
and on a spot chosen for the purpose {bustmn) instead of the
ordinary ustrinum. A large barrow, about twenty feet high,
and about two hundred feet in circumference, stands on the
side of a hill in the parish of Snodland in Kent. In 1814, a
trench was cut through the middle of the mound, and it was
CHAP. XI.]
CINERARY URNS.
3o9
discovered tliat it stood on a level and smooth floor cut m tlie
side of the hill, and covered with a tliiii layer of wood-ashes.
All doubt that these were
the remains of an immense
funeral pile were set at rest
by the circumstance, that
numbers of very long- nails
were scattered about among-
the ashes. As far as the
excavations were carried,
there were no traces of a
Senul'^iiral Urn and Leaden Case from
W roxeter.
sepulchral deposit; so that,
perliaps, this was the scene
of the last ceremonial of
a Roman of distinguished
family, whose ashes had been
gathered into an urn and
carried to Italy, to be depo-
sited in the tomb of his kin-
dred, while the mound was
raised as a memorial over
the spot where he had been
burnt.
The cinerary urns found in the cemeteries in Britain are
generally plain, large (often holding as much as two gallons), of a
hard dark-coloured pottery, and of the form represented in the
two large vessels in the back-ground of the cut on the next page.
The other figures in the same cut are some of the varieties of
urns which have been found containing- bones and ashes. The
cut here given in the margin represents a singularly formed
sepulchral urn, with a leaden case in which it was closed ; it
was found in the cemetery of Uriconium {Wroxeter). and is now
preserved in the Museum at Shrewsbury. In some instances,
where the regular sepulchral urn perhaps could not be obtained,
vessels wliich were made for domestic purposes have been used
as sepulchral urns. Sometimes the ashes are deposited in glass
jars, which are usually of the forms represented in the first two
figures of our group on p. 283. Among the ashes we often find
the coin, the offering to Charon ; and sometimes fragments of
different articles which have been burnt with the body. One
of the small unguent bottles, usually but erroneously called
lachrymatories, is often found within the urn.
Sometimes the cinerary urn, with its contents, was placed
560
THE ROMANS.
,[CHAP. XI.
merely in a liole in the f^round, and covered with a tile or flat
stone. We cannot tell in such cases what sort of memorial,
Roman Sepulchral Urns.
i^ nnv, was placed above-ground, as everything of this kind
has been long cleared away. Perhaps each was covered with
a small mound of earth. But when we open a regular Eoman
cemetery, we usually find the cinerary urn surrounded by a
group of vessels of different descriptions, which perhaps held
wine, aromatics, and other such articles. Among these are
often elegant cups and paterae of the red Samian ware. In the
cemetery of the Kentish Durobrivae {Rochester), the groups
consisted generally of three or four vessels ; at Litlington they
varied in number from three to live. They have been found
similarly grouped in other places. In many cases traces of the
decayed material seem to prove that each group of urns had
been enclosed in a chest of wood, but they were usually
covered above with a large tile or flat stone. The chest, or
grave, was itself often formed of tiles or stones, instead of
wood ; a tile was laid flat for the floor, one long tile formed
each side of the chest, and a shorter one the end, and another
large tile formed the cover. Such sepulchral chests are fre-
quently found on the site of the Roman cemeteries at Colchester.
In one, opened a few years ago, which was fifteen inches long
Roman Tombs.
CHAP. XI.] FORMS OF ROMAN SEPULCHRES. 331
and twelve wide, an urn was found in the middle, lying- on its
side, containing- bones, and beside it were three small vessels,
which had probably been used for ointments, balsams, and other
funeral offerings. Another similar chest of tiles, in the same
locality, contained two earthenware ampullce, or bottles, an in"ii
with burnt bones, and a lamp ; the space between the vessels
was filled with a sandy earth. The largest group of sepidchral
vessels found in this cemetery consisted of fifteen, comprising
two large and two small earthen bottles, six paterae, three small
urn-shaped pots, a terra cotta lamp, a lachrymatory, and the
fragments of a large urn, no doubt the one which had contained
the bones or ashes. A group of twelve vessels comprised an
urn with calcined bones, one large ampulla and three small ones,
two paterae of Samian ware, an earthen lamp, three small urn-
shaped pots, and a bottle of blue glass Avith a long straight
handle. We are told that, from the scorched appearance of
some of the vessels, it appeared that both of these last-mentioned
deposits had been placed on the live embers of the fire of the
funeral piles of the persons at whose obsequies they had been
used. The practice of enclosing or covering the sepulchral
deposits with tiles appears to have been so general, that the
word tegida, a tile, was often used to signify a tomb. The reader
will at once call to mind the lines of Ovid : —
Est honor et tumulis ; animas placate paternas,
Parvaque in extinctas munera ferte pyras.
Pai'va petunt manes ; pietas pro divite grata est
Muncre ; non avidos Styx habet ima deos.
Tecfida prujectis satis est velata coronis,
Et sparsae fruges, parcaque mica salis.
Tt appears from these lines that it was the custom for the
relatives to place on the tile, which covered the sepulchral
deposit, garlands, fruits, and salt.
At York, graves have been found made of tiles, in a very
peculiar arrangement, which is represented in the upper figure
in the accompanying plate, taken from one which is still pre-
served in its original form in the museum of that city. It was
found in the February of 1833, at the distance of about a mile
from York, on the north-west side of the Roman road from
York (EdtiracMm) to Tad caster {Calcarla). It Avas formed of
ten roof-tiles, each one foot seven inches long, one foot three
inches and a half broad, and an inch and a quarter in thickness.
Four of these tiles were placed on each side, and one at eacli
end. with a row of ridge-tiles on the top. Each tile bore the
z
864 THE ROMANS. [chap. xi.
impress, leg vi vi {leg'io sexta vlctrix, the sixth legion vic-
torious). No urn or vessel of any kind was found under these
tiles ; but there was a layer of the remains of a funeral pile,
consisting- of charcoal and bon«s, about six inclies thick, mixed
witli iron nails. Such was not the case with another similar
tomb, dug up at a short distance without the city walls, in
1768. It was formed in tlie same manner, of three tiles on
each side, covered where they joined each other by ridge-tiles,
and with ridge-tiles on the top. Within had been deposited
several urns, containing ashes and earth, standing on a Hat-
tiled pavement. One of them was nearly entire, but the others
w^ei-e more or less broken. A coin of Vespasian and another of
Domitian were picked up near the tomb. On each tile was the
inscription leg ix hisp {leglo nona Hlspmdca, the ninth legion,
the Spanish) . Tombs exactly similar to these have been found
at Strasbourg on the Rhine (^Argentoratiuii), erected over
soldiers of the eighth legion, which was stationed there. One
of them is represented in an engraving in the tenth volume of
the ' Histoire de I'Acadeniie des Inscriptions.' Each tile in
the Strasbourg- tomb was stamped with the words leg vrii AV(i
{legio octava Augusta, the eighth legion, the Augustan).
Sepulchral chests made of stone are much more rare in
Roman burial-places than those formed of tiles. One of the
most remarkable was that found at Avisford in Sussex, in 1817,
which is represented in the middle figure (No. 2) in our plate.
Avisford is in the immediate neighbourhood of the Roman
road leading from Regnum to the station called in the Itinerary,
Ad Decimum. It appears to have been a chest formed out of a
solid stone, and covered with a flat slab or lid. ^w the middle
was a large square vase of fine green glass, like those already
alluded to, containing calcined bones. Around it were arranged
on the floor of the chest, three elegantly-shaped earthen vases
with handles, several paterae, a pair of sandals studded with
numerous little hexagonal brass nails fancifully arranged, three
lamps placed on sup]3orting projections of the stone, an oval
dish and handle escalloped round the edge, containing a trans-
parent agate of the form and size of a pigeon's e^g, and a
small double-handled glass bottle placed in one of the patera?.
Lamps are frequently found in Roman sepulchres, and popular
superstition has given rise to stories which represent them as
l)eiug discovered still burning in ancient sepulchral vaults.
This notion is so absurd, that we cannot but wonder how it
ever gained credit : but they were probably burning when placed
CHAP. XI.] SEPULCHRAL CHESTS. 3C,o
in the grave. Among other inscriptions relating to this custom,
Gruter has published the following, which, it will be sten, was
intended to form three lines in verse : —
HAVE • SEPTIMIA Aclieu, Septimia ;
SIT • TiBi • TERRA * LETis May the earth lie light upon you !
aviSQVE • HVic • TVMVLO Whoever on this tomb
posviT • ARDENTE * LVCERNAM has placed a lamp burning,
iLLivs • ciNERES may his ashes
AVREA • TERRA ' TEGAT a golden soil cover !
Instances occur of more singular contrivances for producing
the sepulchral cliest, or tomb. In a Homan cemetery at Ciren-
cester was found a stone which had been cut into the shape of
a short cylindrical column ; this had been sawn through the
middle, and in tlie centre of the lower half a cell was cut to
contain the urn, which was enclosed by joining the two parts
of the column together. This probably had stood above-
ground. Several instances have been met with in which an
amphora has been used for a tomb ; the upper part, or neck,
having been sawn or broken off, the cinerary urn, with the
other vessels and articles usually deposited with the urns, were
placed inside 5 and the neck was then rejoined to the body of
the amphora, and the whole buried in the ground. An instance
of this mode of interment was found at Colchester in 1844.
The upper part of a large globular amphoi-a, of a pale red
colour, had been sawn off, and replaced after the different
articles were deposited inside. These articles were a cinerary
urn, with a lid, represented in front of our group of sepulchral
urns on p. 360, filled with calcined bones, a lachrymatory of
pale green glass, a small earthen lamp, and another lamp of a
finer clay, a number of iron nails, and a coin of second brass
with the head of Faustina Junior. One or two instances have
occurred in which, instead of the calcined bones or ashes being
placed in an urn, the sepulchral chest was partly filled with, a
loose heap of ashes. One of the tombs at York described
above furnishes an example of this practice. An instance of
one of the small rectangular cists of tiles, thus filled with ashes,
has occurred, I think, at Colchester. We may perhaps explain
this, by supposing that, in consequence of some accident, the
ashes of the deceased had been so mixed with those of the
funeral pile, that it was not possible to separate them, and that
therefore the relations had gathered all the ashes near wdiere
the body must have lain, and thrown them into the tomb.
When the body was buried entire, it was interred in several
366
THE ROMANS.
CHAP. XI,]
different manners. The skeleton, as now found, appears often
as thougli it had been merely committed to the eartli ; but as
it is in most instances accompanied with a quantity of larj^e
iron nails, it is probable that in all tliese cases the body was
placed in a chest or coffin of wood. In some places, and
especially at York, massive chests, or sarcophagi, of stone, have
been found, which appear from their forms and inscriptions to
have stood above-ground. The accompanying cut represents
a sarcophagus found at London, and somewhat remarkable
Sarcophagus found in London.
for its ornaments. In the centre of the front side is a sunken
medallion containing a youthful bust, no doubt intended as
a portrait of the person interred in it. The back was quite
plain, as thougli it had stood against a wall or other building.
It contained a skeleton. Several fine examples of these sarco-
phagi may be seen in the museum of the Philosophical Society
at York ; and examples are given, from the plates to Mr Well-
beloved's ' Eburacum,' in the third or lower group in our plate
at p. 362. Such sarcopliagi have been frequently found at
York, and they present a very peculiar mode of sepulture.
After the body had been laid, apparently in full dress (those
hitherto discovered have generally contained the remains of
ladies), on its back at the bottom of the sarcophagus, liquid
lime was poured in until the body was covered. This, be-
coming hard, has preserved, to a certain degree, an impression
of the form of the body, of which the skeleton is often found
entire. Of one of these sarcophagi, which was found by the
side of the road from Heslington to Grimston, and is now in
the York museum, Mr Wellbeloved gives the following de-
scription : — ' On removing the lid, the coffin appeared to be
about half filled with lime, excepting the place in Avhich the
head had lain. The lime having been very carefully taken out.
CHAP. XI.]
STONE COFFINS.
367
the lower surface presented a distinct impression of a human
body, over which, with the exception of tlie face, the lime had
been poured in a liquid state ; the body having been first
covered with a cloth, the texture of which is still clearly to be
seen in the impression on the lime. The feet had been crossed,
and covered with shoes or sandals, having nails in the soles ;
the marks of which on the lime were distinctly visible, and
several of the nails themselves were found in the coffin, in a
very corroded state. A very small portion of the bones re-
mained ; sufficient, however, to indicate that they were those of
a female, and, according to the opinion of a very eminent sur-
geon, that she had been buried in a state of pregnancy. All
the teeth, except one, were found, with the enamel undecayed.
Just above the left shoulder a small portion of a gold ring-
appeared, and the lime surrounding it having been carefully
scraped away, the remnants of a lady's ornaments were brought
to light, consisting of fragments of large jet rings, two earrings
of fine gold, two bracelets, several brass or copper rings, one
of which resembled a cog-wheel, about two inches in diameter,
three finger-rings, one of them of jet, of a modern pattern, and
two necklaces. One of the necklaces was formed of glass
beads, yellow and green ; the other of small beads of coral, in-
termixed with smaller beads of blue glass, strung, in both
cases, on very slender twisted silver wire.' In a coffin of this
description more recently found at York, and also deposited itf
the museum, the lime bears the impression of a female with s
small child laid in her lap, and the colour, a rich purple, ai
well as the texture of the cloth which covered her, is distinctly
visible in the impression. One of these coffins, found at York,
had contained the body of a large man, whose skull was cloven
as though by the blow of an axe or sword. The lids of these
stone sarcophagi were often fastened to the lower part, or chest,
with iron cramps.
Cliiy Coffin found at Aldborough [Isurium).
Sarcophagi, for the reception of the body when not burnt,
368
THE ROMANS.
[chap. XL
were sometimes made of baked clay, either in one piece with a
lid, or in several pieces, so formed as to fit tof>:ether. Several
examples of such clay coffins have been found at York, and at the
neio-hbouring town of Aldboroug-h ; in the latter place they are
found somewhat resembling violin-cases in form. The acconi-
panying example of these clay coffins from Aldborough is shaped
like the sole of a shoe.
A description of coffin found more frequently in this country
was formed of lead. Many examples of these leaden coffins
have been met with in the Eoman cemeteries at Colchester,
York, London, and elsewhere. When these coffins are orna-
mented, the ornaments consist almost always of scallop shells
and bead-mouldings, sometimes interspersed with small circles.
The annexed cut represents one of these coffins dug up, a few
Leaden Coffin from Colcliester {Camulodunum) .
years ago, in a Koman cemetery near Colchester. It Avas four
feet three inches in lengtli, fifteen inches wide at the head, and
eleven at the feet, and nine and a half inches deep exclusive of
the lid. It was formed of a sheet of lead cast in a mould, and
bent upwards on each side, with square pieces, soldered at the
top and bottom, to form the ends. The lid was formed by
being notched at the head and feet, and then bent down at the
edges and soldered, to lap over the coffin. The entire exterior
was tastefully ornamented with scallop shells, rings, or circles,
and a beaded pattern. All that is known of its contents is that,
like the stone coffins found at York, it was partly filled with
lime. The coffin itself is now in the private museum of Mr
Bateman, of Yolgrave, in Derbyshire ; another leaden coffin,
found at Colchester about the same time, was sold for old lead,
and melted down ; but from a sketch which was taken of it
before it was destroyed, it appears to have been still more
elaborately ornamented, chiefly with the same scallop shells,
rings, and bead moulding. Morant records the discovery of a
similar leaden coffin at Colchester, in the March of the vcar
i
■JHAP. XI.] LEADEN COFFINS. 369
1750. It contained wliat Avas called a qnantity of dust, per-
haps lime, but very little of the bones remained. ' There lay
near the head two bracelets of jet, one plain, the other scalloped,
and a very small and slender one of brass wrought, and four
bodkins (? hair-pins) of jet. The coffin was cast, or wrought,
all over with lozenges, in each of which was an escallop shell.
Near it was found an urn, holding about a pint, in which were
two coins of large brass, one of Antoninus Pius, and the other
of Alexander Severus.'
Several Roman leaden coffins have been found at different
times on the sites of the cemeteries of Eoman London. One,
dug up in Mansell-street, AVhitechapel, in 1843, had contained
the body of a child, and resembled in constmction and orna-
ment the one engraved above. In the immediate vicinity, and on
the same level, were found skeletons, urns with l)urnt bones,
and various articles, such as are usually found in Roman ceme-
teries. In a leaden coffin dug up at Stratford-le-Bow, in 1844,
the remains of a skeleton were found embedded in lime. In
Weever's 'Funeral Monuments,' published in 1631, we are
informed that, 'within the parish of Stepney in Middlesex, in
Ratcliffe-tield, where they take ballast for ships, about some
fourteen or fifteen years ago, there was found two monuments,
the one of stone, wherein was the bones of a man, the other a
chest of lead, the upper part being garnished Avith scallop
shells, and a crolister border. At the head of the coffin and
the foot, there were two jars, of a three-feet length, standing,
and on the sides a number of bottles of glistening red earth,
some painted, and many great vials of glass, some six, some
eight square, having a whitish liquor within them. Within the
chest was the body of a Avoman, as the chirurgeons judged by
the skull. On either side of her there Avere two sceptres of
ivory, eighteen inches long, and on her breast a little figure of
Cupid, neatly cut in Avhite stone. And amongst the bones two
painted pieces of jet, Avith round heads in form of nails, three
inches long. It seemeth (saith Sir Robert Cotton, from Avhoui
I had this relation) these bodies Avere buried about the years
of our Lord 239 ; besides there Avere found divers coins of
Pupienus, Gordian, and the emperors of that time ; and thus
one may conjecture by her ornaments, that this last body should
be some prince's or proprietor's Avife herein Britaineinthe time
of the Roman government.' It need hardly be remarked that,
to the modern antiquary. Sir Robert Cotton's conjectures seem
very ridiculous. Stepney is known to be the site of one of the
610 THE ROMANS. [chap. xi.
cemeteries of Uonian London. A similar coffin was fonnd
towards the close of the last century in a Eoman burial-place
in Battersea-fields ; it was ornamented with scallop shells and
cord moulding, and contained a skeleton embedded in lime.
Another, found in 1811, in the Kent-road, near the Asylum
for the Deaf and Dumb, is engraved in the ' Archseologia.' It
was bordered and divided into five compartments by the band
and fillet ornament. In the uppermost compartment Avere two
figures of Minerva, counterparts of each other ; the three
intermediate compartments were diagonally crossed by tlie same
ornament, and tlie lowest compartment contained two scallop
shells. The remains of a skeleton were found also in this coffin.
The leaden coffins found at York are supposed, by Mr Well-
beloved, to have been encased in wood. Wooden coffins appear
to have been extensively used in Roman cemeteries in this
country. They are traced by the marks of decayed wood, and
more especially by the presence of large long nails which had
been used to attach the planks of the coffin together. These
nails are found in great quantities in the Koman cemeteries at
Colchester, and elsewhere on similar sites. In a cemetery in
Eourne Park, near Canterbury, several skeletons were found,
lying near each other, and accompanied with such nails, from
six to nine inches long. Pour or six nails are said to have
been found with each skeleton, near the shoulders, hands, and
feet, which are the positions into which they would naturally
have fallen from the coffin as it decayed. Prom the nature of
the ground, here, as in many other places under similar circum-
stances, after such a great length of time, the decay of the wood
had been so complete, that no further trace of it was perceived ;
and it was rather hastily supposed that the presence of these nails
proved that the skeletons were the remains of crucified martyrs.
Wooden coffins of another fashion are found in this country,
chiefly towards the north, and they seem to have been peculiar
to the part of our island represented in modern times by East
Yorkshire. These are rudely constructed out of the trunks of
large trees. In the year 1834 a large tumulus on the cliffs
near the village of Gristhorpe, some six miles from Scarborough,
was opened, and was found to contain what was at first taken
for a mere rough log of wood ; but, on further examination, it
proved to be a wooden coffin formed of the rough trunk of an
old oak tree, the external bark of which was still in good pre-
sei'vation. It had been roughly hewn at the extremities, split,
and then liollo\ved internally to receive the body. My cut wilJ
CHAP. Xt.]
WOODEN COFFINS.
371
give the best idea of the appearance of this primitive coffin,
which was much damaged in its removal from the tumulus.
Tlie trunk of the tree ])ad been split tolerably equally for the
Wooden CoflRn found at Gristhorpe.
coffin and its cover were of nearly the same dimensions. The
oidy attempt at ornament was what was taken for a rude figure
of the human face cut in the bark at one end of the lid, which
appeared to have been held to the coffin only by the uneven
fracture of the wood corresponding on each part. At the bot-
tom of the coffin, near the centre, a hole, three inches long and
one wide, had been cut through the wnod, apparently for the
purpose of carrving off the aqueous matter arising from the
decomposition of the body. This coffin was about seven feet
long by three broad. When first 0})ened it was nearly full of
water; but on this being cleared away, a perfect and Avell-
preserved skeleton presented itself, which was laid on its right
side, with its head to the south. The body, the skeleton of
which measured six feet two inches, having been too long for
the hollow of the coffin, which was only five feet four inches
long, the legs had been necessarily doubled up. Several small
articles were found in this coffin with the skeleton, which are
represented in the following cut. These were three pieces
372
THE ROMANS.
[chap. XI,
of chipped flint (figs 1, 2, and 6) ; a well-executed ornament,
resembling a large stud or button, apparently of horn, wliich
mw
Articles found in the Gristliorpe Coffin.
had every appearance of having been formed by the lathe (tig.
4) ; a pin of the same material, which lay on the breast, and
had apparently been employed to secure a skin, in which the
body had evidently been enveloped (fig. 7) ; an article of wood,
also formed like a pin, but having what would be its point
rounded and flattened on one side to about half its length (fig.
8) ; fragments of an ornamental ring of similar material to the
stud, and supposed, from its large size, to have been uscd for
fastening some part of the dress (fig. 3) ; the remains of a small
basket of wicker-work, the bottom of which had been formed of
bark, and a flat bronze dagger or knife (fig. 5). None of these
articles give us much assistance in fixing the age of this curious
interment, except the dagger, and that is not very certain.
Chipped flints are found very frequently in Eoman interments,
both in this coimtry and on the continent ; and I have also
found them in Saxon graves ; but the dagger belongs to a type
of which several examples have been found in the Wiltshii-e
bari'ows, as well as in similar interments in other parts of
England, which, from all the circumstances connected with
them, we shoidd be led to ascribe to a remote date, probably to
the earlier period of the Eoman occupation of our island. A
quantity of vegetable substance was also found in the coflHn,
which was rather hastily conjectured to be the remains of
mistletoe. The coffin, after being deposited in its grave, had
been covered over with large oaken branches. It may be added
that, above this, the tumulus was formed first of a layer of
CHAP. XI.]
WOODEX COFFINS.
373
clay, followed by a layer of loose stones, another layer of clay,
and a second layer of loose stones, and tlie whole was finally
covered with soil, which had doubtless collected upon this
tumulus during- the long- period since it was raised. This
coffin was placed in the Museum at Scarborough. I was sul)-
sequently informed that a somewhat similar coffin had been
found at Beverley Parks, near Beverley, in dig-g-ing a drain
there in 1848. It is represented in the accompanying cut. A
slab, wliich had been cut or split from the rest, formed a lid ;
but it had been fastened to the chest by means of four oaken
thrindles, or pegs, about the size of the spokes of a common
Wooden Coffin found at Beverley.
ladder, and the ends of the coffin liad been bevelled off, so as
to leave less of the substance of the wood where the holes for
the pegs were drilled through. This coffin was nearly eight
feet and a half long externally, and seven feet and a half in-
ternally ; and it was four feet two inches in width. Some
fi'agments of human bones were found in it, but not calcined.
The next coffin of this description, which is represented in our
cut, was found in a barrow on an elevated spot on the bank of
Wooden Coffin found near Great Driffield.
V
374 THE ROMANS. [chap. xi.
a stream in the neig-hbovirliood of Great Driffield, near a place
called Sunderlandwick. Two large and thick branches of trees
had here, as at Gristhorpe, been placed over the coffin before
the mound was filled in. The coffin, in this instance, was, like
the others, hollowed from the solid trunk of an oak tree, but it
diftered from them in having no ends ; and, though it came in
two pieces when taken out of the earth (or rather in three, for
the lid broke in two), it was supposed bv those who found it
that it had been originally one entire piece, a sort of large
wooden tube, or pipe, formed by hollowing through the heart
of the timber. This coffin was about six feet in length and
four in breadth, the disproportion in breadth being accounted
for by the circumstance that it was intended to contain three
bodies, two of which were laid with their heads turned one
way, and the other turned in the contrary direction. The
coffin, in consequence of the ends being unprotected, was filled
Avith clay and sand, which had become mixed with the human
remains, and the bones were in so fragile a condition through
(tecay that they fell to pieces when disturbed, and ad-
mitted of no careful examination. A quantity of ashes lay
mixed with the surrounding soil, which are described as still
retaining a smell of burning. The coffin in this instance lay
east and west. From the remains that were found, it would
seem that these coffins belonged to a date not later than the
close of the Roman period.
I repeat these observations on the wooden coffins found in
East Yorkshire from my Essays on Archa:>ological Subjects,
published in the year 1861.* At that time the local Ijoard
of health at Selby was carrying on excavations for sewerage,
&c. in that town, which brought to light numerous ancient
remains. While cutting through a piece of ground called
the Church Hill, which was understood to be the site of the
ancient parish church, destroyed when the old abbey church
was inade parochial, the workmen met with no less than four-
teen of these wooden coffins, all made, like those I have been
describing, out of the solid trunks of oak trees, which had been
separated into two pieces in order to form a chest and lid, and
had been scooped out to form a receptacle for the corpse. I
was informed that these coffins were found near the surface of
the ground, some of them at a depth of not more than eighteen
inches, lying parallel to each other, in a direction nearly ease
* See my Essays on Archaeological Subjects, London, 1861, vol. i. p. 36
to p. 47.
1
CHAP. XI.] WOODEN COFFINS. 375
and west. The annexed cut represents one of tliese coffins, tlie
only one which had been examined with raucli care. It con-
tained what was pronounced to be the body of a full-grown
"Wooden Coffin found at Selby.
female. This coffin was six feet ten inches long ; another,
which lay near it, measured nearly eight feet. All the other
similar coffins were found to contain the remains of human
skeletons. It may be remarked that in this Selby coffin the
upper part, or lid, Avas hollowed out in a corresponding man-
ner to the lower part. The two parts of the same coffin were,
in all the wooden coffins found at Selby, fastened together by
oval wooden p(;gs driven down into the side, as in the Bevei'ley
coffin. When first discovered, the wood of the npper part was
decayed and broken away, so as to expose the face of the
skeleton, as here shown.
Although the wooden coffins found at Selby contained no
articles by which their age was determined, we can have
no doubt that they belonged to Christian interments, and
that they were laid in regular juxtaposition in a churchyard.
There are, however, circumstances connected with the barrows
in the maritime district of Yorkshire to the south of Scarborough
which would lead us to believe that most of them belong to the
later Roman period, in which case we may more easily under-
stand how a particular form of coffin then in use may have
continued in use during the subsequent Anglo-Saxon period.
I am not aware of the discovery of coffins of the same de-
scription in other parts of the island ; and they seem to show,
which would indeed be a curious fact, that a peculiar buriid
practice had continued to exist in the district of Eastern York-
shire from a period dating as far back as the commencement of
the Roman occupation of our island to probably a late Anglo-
Saxon period.
[n some cases, the sepulchral chest was expanded into a
376 THE ROMANS. [chap. xr.
spacious chamber. One found at York, in the time of Thoresby,
is described by that antiquary as large enough to contain two
or three corpses ; it was carefully paved with bricks eight inches
square and two inches thick, and covered with bricks two feet
square. When discovered, it was found to be empty. Another
sepulchral chamber, larger than this, was found, as Mr Well-
beloved informs us, 'by some workmen in the year 1807, Avhen
digging for the foundation of a house, near the Mount, without
Micklegate-bar. It is a small room or vault, about four feet
below the present surface, eight feet in length, five feet in
breadth, and six feet in height ; the roof being arched and
formed of Roman tiles, each of about one foot square, and two
and a half inches in thickness. In this vault was found a
sarcophagus, of a single grit-stone, covered with a blue Hag-
stone, containing a skeleton, in remarkable preservation ;
arising, probably, from its being immersed in water, which
had filtered through the earth ; the head elevated by being
placed on a step. At the north end of the vault there was an
aperture, too small to have admitted the sarcophagus, and
carelessly closed by large stones. On each side of the skull a
small glass vessel, usually called a lachrymatory, was found,
one of them perfect, the other broken. The sarcophagus was
without an inscription. The other sides of the vault wei-e not
seen, except that through which the workmen broke, and by
which visitors are now admitted to view this interesting sepul-
chral antiquity.' Perhaps, if the whole were uncovered, an
inscription would be found on the outside of the building. A
large sepulchral chamber of rather a ditt'erent description, and
containing a variety of amphorae, paterae, and other articles,
was found in 1849, at Mount Bures, near Colchester.
Sepulchral chambers, like that found at York, no doubt
stood above-ground, forming conspicuous objects by the side of
the highway. We find in Britain very few traces of sepulchral
buildings of this kind, because where they existed they were
no doubt cleared away during the middle ages for their
materials.
In some cases, particularly at a distance from large towns,
the sepulchral chamber was inclosed in a mound of earth, or
barrow. The mound of earth was a form of monument which
belonged to an early age, and was perhaps adopted in the case
of Romans who died in the provinces, as more durable thaji
the sepulchre of stone —
Ergo instauramus Polydoro funus, et in^'ens
Aggeritui' tumulo tellus. — Vi>'(j. ^iJ/i., iii. 62.
CHAP, xi.l ROMAN BARROWS. 377
The most remarkable Eoman tumuli, or barrows, in Britain,
are the group called the Bartlow hills, in the parish of Ashdon,
on the northern border of Essex. They were opened a few
years ag'o, and the different modes in which the internal tombs
were constructed seemed to show that they were not all
erected at the same time. In form they are all conical. Tin;
height of the largest is forty-five feet, and its diameter a
hiui(h'ed and forty-seven. Six others, which complete the
group, are of somewhat smaller dimensions. When the largest
barrow was opened, it was found that the sepulchral chamber
in the centre had been constructed of wood ; it contained a
large glass vessel resembling the second figure in our group on
p. 283 ; a bronze patera, with a reeded handle terminating in a
I'am's head ; a bronze dish ; a lamp, also of bronze ; a beauti-
fnl bronze enamelled urn with handle ; a folding stool or seat ;
and a pair of strigils. A large amphora, filled Avith earth, ashes,
and fragments of bones, was placed outside this wooden chest.
In the centre of one of the smaller Bartlow barrows was found
a closed vault, built of brick, six feet three inches long, two
feet three inches and a half wide, and about three feet high,
standing north and south on a bed of chalk, about a foot below
the natural surface. The covering was formed of flat tiles
overlapping each other. When these were removed, the tomb
was found to contain a large glass vessel, which is the first
figure in our group just alluded to, and which contained bones
and ashes ; a small glass vessel of the same form, containing a
dark-coloured fluid ; and a vessel of wood, formed like a pail,
with a handle at the side.
In these barrows the body had undergone the process of
cremation, but in a very remarkable one, called Eastlow hill,
at llougham in Suffolk, opened by Professor Henslow, in the
year 1844, the body of the deceased had been buried entire.
The tomb in this case was a miniature Roman house, of strong-
masonry, with a roof peaked and tiled on the outside. It was
built upon a platform, fifteen feet square, formed of a concrete
of large flints and very hard mortar mixed with sand. The
lengtli of the tond), or house, on the exterior, was twelve feet,
and its width six feet and a half. The tliickness of the walls
was two feet, and their height at the sides the same ; the height
of the roof, fVom the ground to the ridge, was five feet. The
interior was found to be a cylindrical vault. In the middle of
the floor stood a leaden chest or coffin, six feet nine inches long,
one foot five inches broad, and one foot four inches deep. It
haci oeen formed of a sheet or sheets of lead, by turning up the
^78 THE ROMANS. [chap. xi.
sides and ends, after cutting out the piece at the corners. The
edges were soldered on the inside. The lid was a loose sheet of
lead, turned in at the edges in the same wny. Within this
chest lay the skeleton, which was in a tolerably good state of
preservation. The leaden chest appeared to have been enclosed
in wood-work, for a great many nails, from two to twelve inches
long, were found lying by its side, among a mass of decayed
wood. A Roman coin was found within the leaden tomb —
Professor Henslow seems to say in the mouth of the skeleton —
the obolus to propitiate Charon. A little chamber at one end,
outside the vault, appeared to have contained glass and other
vessels, which Avere broken to pieces. This large tumulus was
one of a group of four ; the others had been opened in the
previons year, and had presented the usual appearance of urns,
&c., which characterise Roman sepulture.
The tomb at Eastlow lay north-east and south-west. That in
the Bartlow hill stood north and south. The most common posi-
tion of the skeletons in Roman cemeteries is east and west, the feet
usually towards the east, but this is by no means always the case.
The Roman sepulchral inscriptions, fonnd in this country,
possess much interest. They are generally met with in the
cemeteries near towns, and consist usually of a slab of stone,
which appears to have been fixed in the ground like our
common churchyard gravestones. At York, the inscriptions
are found on the sides of some of the large stone sarcophagi.
Some of the slabs appear by their form to have been placed
against a larger sepulchre of masonry. The inscription is often
surmounted by a sculptured figure, intended sometimes to
represent the individual commemorated by it. The usual in-
scriptions are dedicated at the beginning to the gods of the
shades, perhaps meaning to the shades of the departed, dlis
manibiis, which is most frequently expressed merely by the two
letters d.m.* The name of the deceased is then stated, with
his age, and, if a soldier, the number of years he had served.
This is usually followed by the name of the person who has
raised the tomb. The age is often stated with great precision,
as in the following simple memorial found on a sepulchral slab
at Ellenborough in Cumberland : —
DM To the g-ods of the shades.
IVL MAKITIM Juli<a Maritiiiia
A vix AN lived twelve years,
XII. M. Ill D. XXII three nio-nths, twenty-two days.
* At Carrawburgh, in Northumberland (Frocolitia), was found an altar
CHAP. XI.]
SEPULCHRAL INSCRIPTIONS.
379
Another common form of inscription, omitting sometimes the
D. M. at the beginning, closed with the words, hie situs est, is
placed, or laid, here. We may quote as an instance of this
formula a rather well-known tombstone found, a few years ago,
at Cirencester, and renresented in the aTinexed cut. The
RVTVS-SlTAEaVES'CHOV ^
7RKCVN\'AMNi'XLSTlPXXil
HEREDPS-EXSTESTF-CVRIWE j
)\ H S X \ E
^m^ih^
J\,^/-*■^
■HlHilllil
^l_A
4
7!^
Tomb from Cirencester (Ooriniiim).
figure above is one often met with on the moni.me.Ttf» of
soldiers in the Roman cavalry. The inscription must he
read, —
RVrVS • SITA • EaVES * CHO VI
TKACVM • ANN * XL STIP XXII
HEREDES • EXS ' TEST * F. CVRAVE
H S E
It may be transkted, ' Rufus Sita, a horseman of the sixtli
dedicated to the dei manes, with the inscription D. M. D. tranqvila
SEVERA PRO SE ET SVIS V. S. L. M.
380 THE ROMANS. [chap. xi.
coliort of Tliracians, aged forty years, served twenty- two years.
His heirs, in accordance with his will, Imve caused this monu-
ment to be erected. He is laid here.' In a monument found
at Caerleon, the formula is varied as follows : —
1) M IVL IVLIANYS To the p:ods of the shades, Julius
Julianus,
MIL LEG II AVG STIP a Soldier of the second legion, the
Augustan, vserved
XVIII ANNOR XL eighteen years, aged forty,
Hic SITVS EST is laid here,
CVRA AGENTE by the care
AMANDA of Amanda
CONIVGE his wife.
A sepulchral monument, found at Ellenboroug'h in Cumberland,
begins with the words Hic exsegere fata, here have undergone
their fates. We see in these inscriptions how cautiously a
direct allusion to death is avoided. We have an exception to
this remark in an inscription found of late years at Caerleon, in
which one of the persons commemorated is said to have died in
a war in Germany.
i> M To the gods of the shades.
I'ADA • VALLAVNivs vixiT Tadia Vallaunius, who lived
ANN • Lxv • ET TADivs * EXVPERTVS sixty-fivc years, and Tadius
Exupertus,
riLivs • vixiT • ANN * xxxvii • DEFVN her son, who lived thirty-seven
years, and
TVS • EXPEDITIONE GERMANICA died in the German expedition.
TADIA • EXVPERATA ' FILIA Tadia Exuperata, a daughter
MATRI • ET • FRATiii * piissiMA to her mother and brother most
attached,
SECTS TVMVLVM near the tomb
PATRis POSViT of her father placed this.
In another inscribed slab, found at Caerleon, the tomb is
called a monumentum, and another phrase is used, —
D • M To the gods of the shades.
IVLIA • VENERi Julia Vcneria,
A • AN • XXXIII aged thirty- three years.
I • ALE SAN • CON Alexander, her husband
piENTissiMA most attached,
ET * I • BELiciANVS and Julius Belicianus,
F • MONiME her son, this monument
F • c caused to be made.
In a sepulchral inscription, given by Camden as found at
Silchester, the tomb is dedicated to the memory of the de-
ceased,—
I
MEMORIAE To the memory
PL • viCTORi of Flavia Victorina,
I
CHAP. XI.] SEPULCHRAL INSCRIPTIONS. 381
NAE • T • TAM Titus Tampliilus
VICTOR Victor,
CONIVN'X lier husband,
posviT placed this.
In some instances, as in an inscription at York, and another
found at London, memrn'm is used for momimentum, and the
plirase memoriam posidt is adopted in the sense of ' raised a
monument.' An inscription found at Eibchester, in Lan-
cashire, which has been often quoted, commenced with the
words Jus terns tegitur Ael'ia Matrona, with this earth is covered
iElia Matrona. It was the custom among the Romans for
men of family or wealth to build up their own sepulchres before
they (lied, which was usually expressed in the inscription by
the letters v. f. {vivus fecit), V. r. c. [vlvus fociendum ciiravit),
or V. s. P. iv'ivus sibi posuit). Inscriptions of this kind were
placed on monuments of a more ostentatious character, whicii
were raised by the road-side, near large towns. An inscription
was found at York, commemorating one of the magistrates of
the city, which, from the form of the stone, must have been
built in the wall of a large sepulchre. The inscription has
been given as follows : —
M VEREC DIOGENES IIIIIIVIK COL
EBOR IBIDEMQ MORT CIVES BITVKIX
CVBVS HAEC SIBI VIVVS FECIT
which may be translated, ' Marcus Verecundus Diogenes, sevir
of the colonia of Eburacum, and who died thei'e, a citizen of
Biturix Cubus, caused these to be made for him during his life-
time.' Biturix. Cubus, it appears, referred to the district of
Avaricum in Gaul (^Bourges), as the native country of Marcus
Verecundus Diogenes.
Many of the Eoinan sepulchral inscriptions found in this
country display feelings of the tenderest and most affectionate
description. They are addressed to the deceased by near
relatives, who apply to them loving epithets. Sometimes
they are addressed from parents to a child. Thus a large
sarcophagus found at York was made to receive the body of
an infant, whose father was a soldier in the sixth legion. The
inscription is —
D • M • SIMPLICIAE * FLORENTINE
ANIME INNOCENTISSIME
QVE • VIXIT • MENSES * DECEM
FELICIVS • SIMPLEX ' PATER * FECIT
LEG • VI • V
382 THE ROMANS. [chap xi.
' To the gods of the shades. To Simplicia Florentinn, a most
innocent thing, who lived ten months, her father, of the sixth
legion, the victorions, made this.' A monument in the form
of an altar was found at Chesters, in Northumberland {Cllnr-
num), with the inscription, —
I) M s Sacred to the gods of the shades,
FAHIB HONOR To Fabia Honurata,
ATE FABivs Hox Fabius Honoratius,
OHATivsTRiBVN tribune
COH I VANGioN of the first cohort of Vangiones,
ET AVHELiA EGLi and Aurclia Egliciane,
lANE FECKR made this
VXT FiLiE D to their daughter
VLCissiME most sweet.
A stone slab found at Bath, and which seems also to have 1)eeu
placed on a building, bore the following inscription : —
]) M To the gods of the shades,
svcc • PETRONiAE vix To Succia Petronia, who lived
.\XN • III • M • nil • D • IX ' V PETRO three years, four months, nine days,
Valerius
MYLVs • ET TVICTIA SABiNA Petroniulus and Tuictia Sabina,
FiL • KAR • FEC to their dearest daughter, made this.
Several otlier such inscriptions to children, chiefly to little girls,
have been met with in this country, as well as others from
children to their parents. A stone found at Great Chesters, m
Northumberland, presented, under the rude sculpture of a
female figure, the short and simple inscription, —
PIS M To the gods of the shades.
PERViCAE FiLiA F To Pervica, her daughter made this.
On another, found at the same place, was an inscription from
a sister to her brother, —
I) M To the gods of the shades.
AEL • MERCv To ^Uus Mercurialis,
RtALi CORNICVL a trumpeter,
VACIA • SOROR his sister Vacia
FECIT made this.
A wife is often found raising the monument to her husband.
The following inscription was found on a sepulchral slab at
Stanwicks, in Cumberland : —
Dis MANIBV To the gods of the shades
s MARCi TROiANi Of Marcus Trojanus
AVGVSTlMi TVM FA Augustiuius the tomb
ciENDVM CVRAVI erected
T • AEL • AMMiL LVsi.MA j£Ai&, Ammilla Lusima,
coxivx KARiss his most dear wife.
I
CHAP. XI.] SEPULCHRAL IXSCllIPTIONS. 3S3
An inscription found on the line of the wall in Northumber-
land, also addressed by a wife to her deceased husband, a native
of Pannonia, furnishes us with an undoubtedly Teutonic name ;
the inscription is imperfect : —
D ' M To the gods of the shades.
DAGVALD 'MI ... . Dagvald, a soldier
PAN • vixiT • A . . . of Pannonia, lived years ....
. . . PVSINNA. .... ... Pusinna, his wife,
XTITVL placed this monument.
This last line is not very distinct in the origin al, but it appears
to be part of conjux titulum posuit. Several examples have
been found of affectionate addresses from a father to a wife and
several children. A sepulchral monument at Old Penritli,
•i'iven by Camden, bore the inscription : —
DM To the gods of the shades.
AiciCTVOs MATER Aicetuos, the mother,
vixiT A xxxxv lived forty-five years,
ET LATTio FiL ' vix and Lattio, the daughter, lived
A XII • LiMisivs twelve years. Limisius,
coNiv ET FiLiAE to a wifo and daughter
piENTissiMis most affectionate,
POSViT placed this.
In an inscription on a broken stone, found in the Homan ceme-
tery at Bulmore, near Caerleon, a deceased lady is apostrophised
by her husband and three sons : —
D M To the gods of the shades.
CAESORiA CORO Caesoria Coroca,
CA V A XLViii REM ' " who lived forty-eight years.
s coNivx • • • • s ET Remus, her loving husband, and
MVNAT • • • LEST Munatius, and Lestinus,
Nvs E • • • • EONTi and Leontius,
vs FECERVNT her sons,
FiLi Eivs made this,
A slab found at Carvoran in Northumberland (Magna), bears
the following affectionate inscription : —
D M To the gods of the shades.
AVRE FAiAE To AurcHa Faia,
D SALONAS a native of Salona,
AVR MARCVS Aurelius Marcus,
0 OBSEQ CON a centurion, out of aflfectioo
IVG * SANCTIS for his most holy wife,
siMAE QVAE VI who lived
xiT ANMS xxxiii thirty-three years
SINE VLLA MACVLA without any stuiu,
Gruter has recorded a Roman sepulchral inscription, by one
Marcus Aurelius Paullus, coiijmji incomparablli, cum qua vixit
^
384 THE ROMANS. [chap. xi.
aunis xxv'd, sine ulla querela — to his incomparable wife, with
whom he had lived twenty-seven years, withont any dispute.
When there was no near relation left, the tomb was erected
by the heirs to the property of the deceased, generally, it would
appear, by direction of the will. Many of the sepulchral
monuments in Britain were thus raised by the heirs. The fol-
lowing inscription, found at Ardoch, in Scotland, will serve for
an example of the ordinary formula used under such circum-
stances : —
Dis M\NiRVS To the gods of the shades.
AMMOMVs DA ^ Aiiimonius Damionis,
Mioxis 0 coH centurion of cohort
I HISPANORVM the first of the Spaniards,
STirENDTORVM having served
XXVII HEKEDES tvventy-seven years. His heirs
F c caused this to be made.
In an inscription found at Ellenborough, in Cumberland, the
sons of the deceased acted under the name of his heirs, ^ —
1") M To the gods of the shades
MORI REGIS Of Morus Rex
FiLii HEREDEs the sons, his hoirs,
Eivs SVBSTITVB Substituted this.
KVNT vix A Lxx He Hvcd seventy years.
We have several instances of the desire among members of the
same family to be buried beside each other. A soldier slain in
Germany was brought to Isca {Caerleon) to be interred beside
his father. A broken inscription in one of the stations along
the wall of Hadrian commemorates a native of Galatia, whose
father havhig, as it appears, died in Britain, the son, who died
in his native country, wished on his death-bed to be carried
into Britain to be laid in his father's grave.
. . . . TL SER .... son of Servius,
Qvi NANAT who, born
GALATIA DEC in Gahitia,
* Horsley observes on this inscription, ' It was customary with the
ancients to erect sepulchral monuments for themselves and families, while
they were living ; which might ossibly be the case here, with respect to
this Morus Rex. But the monument he built might have fallen to decay,
or by some accident have been demolished, before his death, and his sons,
upon his decease, have rebuilt it. The word substituerunt seems to intimate
something like this, which signifies the putting of some person or thing in
the room of another which was there before. So we say substituerejudi-
eem ; and by the Roman law the usufructuary was obliged siibstituere
pecora, or arbores, in the room of such as died. It would be very diflBcult
to put any other meaning upon sribstituerunt in this inscripti(m ; for, to
take it in the sense of constituerunt, is perhaps without example.'
CHAP. XI.] SEPULCHRAL IXSCRIPTIOXS. 385
HViT GALA . . . died in Galatia ;
xiT ANN .... he lived .... years ;
MORiTV . . . . on his death-bed
UEsiDER .... he desired
HIS INT .... in his father's tomb to be buried.*
It has been remarked that, to judge from the ages set forth
ill these sepulchral inscriptions, the Romans in Britain gener-
ally died young. The average age seems to be not much more /
than thirty. We find, however, one or two instances of V
longevity. A decurion, or municipal magistrate, of the city of
Ghwxm (Gloucester), was buried at the fashionable watering-
place of Aquae Solis (Bath), who died at the age of eighty-six.
Length of years had perhaps increased his attachment to life,
and he went thither to seek new vigour from the medicinal
waters of the place. From the form of the stone we may
suppose that it was placed on the wall of a tomb of some mag-
nitude. The following is all that remains of the inscription : —
DEC COLONIAE GLEV Dccurion of the colonia of Glevum ;
vixiT AN • Lxxxvi he lived eighty-six years.
One instance has occurred of an age still more patriarchal. In
a cemetery at Bulmore, near Caerleon (Lsca), one or two monu-
ments connected with the same family were found. On one
was the inscription : —
ivL ■ VALENS • VET Julius Valcns, a veteran
LEG • II • AVG • VIXIT of the second legion, the Augustan,
lived
ANNTS • c • IVL a hundred years. Julia
SECVNDINA • CONIVNX Secundina, his wife,
ET IVL MARTiNVS " FiLivs and Julius Martiuus, his son,
F • c caused this to be made.
Close by this stone, another was found with an inscription
recording the death of the wife of this aged veteran, and raised
by their son. The inscription furnishes us with another
formula, dls manibus et memoi'ice^ of which we liave an example
in Gruter, found on tlie continent. It is interesting to find
this identity of expression and sentiment in different parts of
the Roman world. The inscription on the Caerleon monument
runs as follows : — '
* The translation of this inscription is made after the ingenious restora-
tion of Mr Roach Smith, who (Collectanea, ii. p. 202) explains it, I believe
correctly, as follows : — ... fihius sbkvH qvi nat^/.s galatia dec?<bvit
GALATIA ^ixiT ANNOS • . , UORlTYrUS DESIDKKavit j(>a^RIS IN TUmulo
sepeliri. In the second line, nanat appears to be an error of the stone-
cutter for NAT.
386 THE ROMANS. [chap. xi.
D M ET To the j?ods of the snades, and
MEMORIAE to jneinory.
IVLIAE . SECVNDi To Julia Secundina,
NAE . MATRI . PI a most aftectiooate mother,
issiMAE . vixiT . AN who lived years
Nis . LXXV . c . IVL seventy-live, Caius Julius
MARTiNvs . FIL Martinus, her son,
F . c caused this to be made.
Few inscriptions have yet been found referring- to persons of
any rank in society, or to officials, except officers in the army
tliongh we have seen inscriptions commemorative of a decurion
of Glevum and a sevir of Eburacum.
A lingering sentiment of attachment to the living caused
the Romans to select for the sites of their tombs spots by the
side of the high-roads. The inscription on the grave of a
Roman named Lollius, quoted from Gruter, said that he was
' buried by the road -side, that they Avho pass by may say,
Farewell, Lollius.' It was from this circumstance that the
inscription is not unfrequently addressed to the way-faring
traveller, with such phrases as siste, viator (stop, traveller) ;
aspice, viator {look, traveller) ; or cave, viator (beware, traveller).
They were, nevertheless, anxious to protect the last dwellings
of the dead from neglect or disrespect, and warnings to those
who might be inclined to offer indignities to the tombs are not
unfrequently incorporated in the monumental inscription. It
seems to have been considered necessary to tell people that
they shoidd not throw dirt or rubbish against the tombs, or
treat them otherwise in an unseemly manner.* In Italy, it is
sometimes expressly forbidden by the inscription to raise a
funeral pile against a tomb — ad hoc monumentum itstrlnum
appllcare non licet. Sometimes a notice was given that punish-
ment awaited the intruder who should bury any other body in
a sepulchre already occupied. Warnings of this kind belonged
more properly, perhaps, to family sepulchres. A broken stone
found at Watercrook, in Westmoreland, contained an inscription
of which a few letters at the end of each line were wanting, and
the last line was not distinctly legible — it appears, by the form
of the stone, to have been placed against the wall of a large
tomb : —
r . AEL . P . F SERG . BASS
Q D LEG . XX VV . VIX . AN
* Horsley gives an inscription in which a still greater profanation is
spoken of — c . caecilivs . c . et . o. l. florvs . vixit . annos . xvi .
KT MENSIBVS . Vll . QVI . HIC . MIXERIT . AVT . CACARIT . IIABEAT .
DEOS . SVPEROS . ET . INFEROS . IRATOS.
CHAP. XI.] ARTICLES BURIED WITH THE DEAD. 38:
KT . P . KIVATVS LIT5E . ET . HEKO
M . LEG . VI , VIC . EEC . SI a . . •
SEPVLC . ALIVM MOKT
EllIT . INFER .F.D. D.N.N . .
As filled up and explained by Horsley, it may be translated :
' Publius ^lius Bassus, the son of Pablius, of the tribe Sergia,
quaestor designatus of the twentieth legion, the valiant and
victorious, who lived .... years, and Publius
Eivatus, his freedman, and Hero .... a soldier of the sixth
leg-ion, the victorious, caused this to be made. If any one /
shall hitrude another corpse into this sepulchre, he shall pay as y
a fine into the treasury of our lords.'
A superstition, deeply imprinted in the minds of the people,
taught that articles of various kinds burnt or interred with the
deceased would add to the comfort of the departed spirit in the
world of shades. The dead were, therefore, clothed in their
full dress, with their jewellery and personal ornaments, and
they carried with them the coin or coins to pay their passage.
They were often furnished with wine or provisions. The occu-
])ant of the tomb at Avisford, in Sussex, carried with him oi-
lier a pair of sandals nailed with bronze instead of iron. A
mirror was found in a Eoman grave at Colchester, In the
sepulchral chest, in one of the Bartlow hills, a folding stool and
strigils were found. Fictile vases and vessels of glass seem,
in many instances, to have been interred as useful for domestic
purposes. Amphorse were added probably for a similar reason.
Sometimes we meet even with culinary utensils. In one in-
stance, an iron tripod, for placing over a fire, was found with
a chain and pot-hooks in the middle. Almost the only articles
not found in Eoman graves are arms, and I am not aware that
in any example yet known in Britain, a Roman was buried with >/
his warlike weapons. It must also be remarked that Eoman
graves, ricli in such articles as are mentioned above, are not
very common.
Branches and garlands of box and palm, as well as of other
trees or shrubs, appear to have been also deposited in tlie
grave. Such objects were also sculptured on the grave-stones,
and they were perhaps borrowed as emblems by the Christians
from their heathen predecessors. Ii has been rather hastily
supposed by one or two writers that the presence of such sculp-
tures— garlands and branches of palm — proves that the tomb-
stones on which they occur were raised over converts to tlie
38S THE ROMANS. [chap. xi.
faith of the p;ospeL Mr Gag-e (Rokewode), in his account of
the opening of one of the Baitlow hills, published in the twenty-
eighth volume of the Archseologia, has made the following-
remarks on the traces of vegetable substances found there : —
' In the observations made in 1832 upon the objects found in
the brick hiidam^ he says, ' some conjectures were offered on
a dark incrustation seen upon the cinerary urn. A branch of
yew, or other dark vegetable substance, was supposed to have
been the origin of it. This receives confirmation from the
actual finding, on the present occasion, of vegetable remains
scattered in the tomb, and adhering to several of the objects.
Leaves were found adhering to the bottom of the cinerary urn,
from which it would appear that some had been thrown in
before the urn was deposited ; while round the handle of the
lamp a wreath would seem to have been entwined. " These
vegetable remains," remarks Mr Brown, F. E. S., who has had
the kindness to examine them, " appear to consist of the epider-
mis of leaves and ultimate branches of box, the vascular part
and parenchyma being in most cases entirely removed ; I judge
the leaves to belong to box [bitxus sempervlrens), from their
insertion as indicated in the ramuli, from their outline, size,
thickened margin, and arrangement and form of stomata, which
in most cases, however, are removed, leaving round apertures
of the form and size of the whole stoma." Professor Henslow
informs the writer of this memoir, that a skeleton was lately
found in or near Chesterford churchyard, together with a
Roman vase, and that box-leaves lay loose in the soil near the
skull and vase. Some of the leaves are in my possession, and
they are similar to those found at Bartlow.' Mr Gage cites,
in illustration of these discoveries, the beautiful epigram of
Martial (i. 89), in which the box and the palm are connected
with the last home of mortality.
Alcinie, queni raptuni domino crescentibus annis
Labicana levi cespite velat humus,
Accipe non Phario nutantia pondera saxo,
Qua) cineri vanus dat ruitura labor ;
Sed fragiles buxos et opacas palmitis umbras,
Quseque vireiit lacrymis rosoida prata meis.
Accipe, care puer, nostri monumenta laboris ;
Hie tibi perpetuo tempore vivet h(mor.
Cuju mihi supremos Lachesis perneverit annos,
Non aliter cineres mando jacere meos.
It is, of course, to be supposed that the sepulchres which we
have been describing belonged to the better orders of society.
r-H^r. XL] FULGUR DJVOM. 3SQ
The process of cremation was an expensive one, and it was
probal)ly tliis circumstance which gradually led to its abolition.
People of the lower class of society Avere regarded contemptu-
ously, and were thrown into trenches in the ground with little
ceremony or respect. The public burial-grounds for the poor
were called in Italy, puticuU, from puteiis, a pit, on account of
the unceremonious manner in which the dead were thrown into
the shallow pits or trenches. The ground was not even looked
upon as consecrated, and it was without difficulty turned to
other purposes. A burTvl-groiuifl of th^'s kind, at the Esquiline
gate of Eome, was given by Augustus to his favourite ministei",
Maecenas, to be turned into a garden, and the change was
celebrated by Horace : —
Nunc licet Esquiliis habitare salubribus, atque
Aprg'ere in aprico spatiari ; quo modo tristes
Albis infonnem spectabant ossibus humum.
Lib. i., Sat. viii., /. 14.
We have not sufficient information to enable us to trace the
gradual disappearance of the practice of cremation, but we are
told by Macrobius,* who wrote at the beginning of the fifth
century, that the custom of burning had been then so long-
discontinued, that it was only from books lie could gather any
information relating to it. Persons who had committed suicide
were never allowed to be burnt, and the same prohibition
extended to those who died in their infancy. Those who were
struck dead by lightning were believed to have suffered under
the special visitation of the gods, and they were interred as
they died, and on the same spot, if it were not a place where it
was unlawful to bury. On the continent, several Eoman
inscriptions have been found, commemorative of the effects of r
the ' lightning of the gods,' and perhaps marking the place y
where some unfortunate mortal has been thus launched into
eternity. One at Florence bears the inscription fvlgvr divm ;
a similar inscription found at Ntmes {Nemaiisus) has fvlgvk,
DivoM ; another at Palermo (Pcniormus), fvlgvr conditvm ;
and anotlier at Oderzo on the Adriatic {Opiterginm), de caelo
TACTVM ET CONDITVM. We have here another interesting hnk
between the manners of the Romans in Britain and in their
native Italy. A little to the west of the ancient town of Hun-
num {Halion-Chesters) on the wall of Hadrian, has been found
* ' Deinde, licet urendi corpora defunctoruni usus nostro sa^culo nullum
8it, lectio tanien docet eo tempore quo igni davi honor uiortuis habebatur,'
&c. — Macrob. Satio >/al., lib. vii. c. 7.
3yO
THE ROMANS.
[chap. XI.
a stone, represented in the annexed cut, with the identical in-
scription mentioned above, fvlgvr divom. Perhaps one of the
soldiers of the station here met his death from heaven.
Inscribed stone at Halton-Chesters {Runniim).
CHAP. XII.] hOMAX FIBVLM. idi
CHAPTER XII.
J>oiacs(ic Life amonf;- the Roman.s in Britain a.s Illustrated by their Re-
inain.s — Dress and Personal Ornaments — the Toilette — the Household ;
Furniture and Utensils — Female Occupations — Cutlery — Styli^
Scales— Ornamental Articles — ^ Weapons, &c.
If tlie numerous articles belonging- to tlie ordinary usages of
life, which have been found on Roman sites in dift'ereiit parts of
the country, were collected together and arranged, they vvouhl,
no doubt, go far towards giving us a perfect picture of tlie
manners of the population of Britaiu under the Romans. Un-
fortunately, in times back, great quantities have been lost, or
destroyed after their discovery, and those which remain are
scattered about, mostly in private hands, from the want of any
really national museum in which to depose them. They uni-
formly give evidence to the fact that the civilization of Britain,
during the whole of this period, was purely Roman, and that
whatever races settled here under tlie banner of Rome, they
accepted unreservedly its dress and manners as well as its lan-
guage and laws.
The dress of the Romans appears not to have varied much iu
its general character until the later period of the empire. It
was simple in its forms, and the principal distinction between
the garments of classes and individuals consisted in the richness
of the material and in the brilliance of the colours. The dress
of the male sex continued to be composed of the tunic, Avorn
next to the skin, and the toga, over it ; though in later times
it was not unusual to wear more than one tunic, and the
pallium or mantle, a garment borrowed from the Greeks, was
thrown over the toga, or rather sid)stituted in its place. The /
tunic worn by men reached generally to the middle of the thighs, ^
or not, at all events, below the knees. Females had a longer
tunic reaching to the feet, and over it they wore the stola,
Teaching a little below the knees, instead of the toga, and over
392
THE ROMANS.
[cHAr. XTI.
it the pallium, or mantle.* In the formation of these dresses
there was not much ' tailoring' ; ' they consisted of little more
than pieces of clotli, linen, or silk, with fring-es and borders,
wrapped loosely round the body. Almost the only fastenings
appear to have been fibuloe, or brooches, which, from the num-
bers that are continually found on all Roman sites, must have
been used in great profusion. We scarcely ever meet with even
the smallest collection of Roman antiquities, but a considerable
proportion of it consists of fragments of fibulae. The annexed
cut represents the more usual forms of these articles, which
Roman fibulae.
are sometimes more ornamental, but they always, with the
exception of the circular brooches, follow these designs. The
first on the left was found at Caerleon ; the second, which is in
my own possession, came from Boulogne ; the third was found
near Maidstone ; the fourth, at Caerleon ; the fifth, at Stroud
in Kent ; and the one to the extreme right, at Cirencester. The
material is usually bronze, though Roman fibulpe in silver and
gold have been found. A fibula of the form of the last to the
right in our group, of a large size, and made of solid gold, Avas
found at Odiham in Hampshire, in 1844. The round fibulae
appear, from figures in coins and pictures, to have been iised
for fastening the pallium over the shoulder. They are often
more ornamental than the bow-shaped fibulae, and are some-
times enamelled. Lysons has published an engraving of a
beautiful circular fibula, in gold, with figures of griffons on one
side, and bears on the other ; it was found at Old Penrith, in
Cumberland. Buttons are also found, sometimes elegantly
* For the forms of their articles of dress, the reader may refer to any of
the general treatises on the history of costume, such as that by Mr Fair-
httlt, which I would especially recommend.
CHAP, xn.]
HAIR-riXS.
39'
ornamented, but the manner in which they were employed is not
well known.
Bracelets {armlllce) for the wrists are also articles of common
occurrence in l)ronze, silver, and gold. They consist generally
of a simple narrow ring, seldom much ornamented, and often
without any ornament at all. Roman rings, which are more
frequently of gold, are so varied in form that it would not be
possible to give any general description of them. They some-
times contain engraved stones, but these are more frequently
found without their mounting. The frequency with which Eonian
engraved stones, or intaglios, are met with, show that they
were very much in use in all parts of the empire. Roman
ear-rings are usually in gold, though they sometimes occur in
bronze ; it would be as difficult to give a general description of
them as of finger-rings. The beads of the Romans, which were
mostly of glass, have already been described ; they are found
with various fittings and adjuncts, some of which were no doubt
looked upon as amulets.
Among the articles of female ornament that occur in the
greatest abundance are pins {acus), generally of bone or bronze,
which were used for fastening the knot of the hair behind the
head, and are represented as thus employed in ancient busts
and statuettes. Those figured in the annexed cut are all of
B'.'ne Pius and Meedle.
V
391 THE ROMANS. • [chap. xii.
bone, and are represented half the size of the originals. The'v
were in the museum of Mr Rolfe, of Sandwich, and are here
taken from Mr Roach Smith's work on Richborough. Mr
Smith's own museum presents a large and varied collection of
such pins. They have sometimes large heads, and were
elaborately ornamented, terminating, in some instances, in a
bust, 01" in a figure. Some very curious Roman hair-pins,
made of coloured glass, were found near Dorchester, in Dorset-
shire, in 1850. Martial has left us a shoii epigram which
illustrates the use of the hair-pin, —
u4cus aurea.
Tenuia ne inadidi violent bombycina crines ;
Figat acus tortas sustineatque comas.
Eplg. lib. xiv. 24.
An article of personal ornament, worn by men, the torques,
torquis, or collar, must not be overlooked in speaking of the
subject which now occupies our attention. The torques is said,
by ancient writers, to have been originally used by the I'ersians
in the east, and by the nations of northern and western Europe.
Virgil describes it as worn by the Trojans, when they came to
colonize Italy : —
Omnibus in morem tonsa coma prossa corona,
Cornea bina ferunt prsefixo hastilia ferro ;
Pars leves humero pharetras ; it pectore summo
Flexilis obtorti per collum circulus auri.
It is first mentioned in Roman history in the year 360 B.C.,
when Manlius, having torn a torques of gold from the neck of
a vanquished Gaul, placed it on his own, and received, from
this circumstance, the name of Torquatus. From this time, in
the wars with the Gauls, the example of Torquatus Manlius
Avas often imitated, and the torques was adopted among the
Romans as the reward of military merit. Torques are not
unfre([uently found in our island, and appear, in some instances,
to be of British manufacture, thougli in others they are
undoubtedly Roman. The Roman writers speak of them as
worn by the Britons, and the queen of the Iceni, Boadicea, is
described by Dion Cassius as having a torquis of gold round
her neck. This was the metal of which they were usuallv
made. They consisted of a long piece of gold, twisted or
spiral, doubled back in the form of a short hook at each end,
and then turned into the form of a circle. The usual form is
represented in fig. 1 in the cut on the next page. The gold was
sometimes worked with more elaborate ornament into twisted
CHAP. XII.]
TORQUES AND AmilLL.^.
cords, &c., and ended in serpents' heads, instead of plain
hooks An inscription found in France, and published by
Montfaucon, mentions a torques dedicated to yEsculapius,
which was made by twistini>: together two golden snakes. A
very remarkable torques of line gold was found in Needwood
Forest, in Staffordshire, in 18 -i 8, where it had been turned up
out of the earth by a fox. It was formed of eight plaited
cords of gold, weighing together 1 lb. 1 oz. 7 dwts. and 10 grains.
At Pattingham, also in Staffordshire, a golden torques was found
in the year 1700, which weighed no less than 3 lbs. 2 oz. It
is described as being ' curiously twisted and wreathed, with
two hooks at each end, cut even, but not twisted.' Its
value, probably, hindered it from being preserved. The torques
found in Needwood Forest is now in the possession of her
IMajesty; and an engraving of it was given in the thirty-third
Torques and Arniillae.
volume of the ' Archseologia,' from which the one in our cut
(2) is taken. The torques was sometimes bent into a spiral,
instead of a circular, form, in which case it was intended for
the arm, not the neck ; it was in this case denominated torquis
h'achialis, and was usually of bronze. In some instances it is
merely a piece of metal like that in fig. 1, twisted into a spiral
form for the arm ; but it is often much more massive. The
elegant bronze armlet (fig. 3 in our cut), found on the coast of
Murrayshire, in Scotland, weighed nearly two pounds and a
half. x\nother description of bronze armlet, or bracelet, in-
tended, like the one last mentioned, for the military, probably
as a mark of honour, was formed of a triangular bar of bronze,
2 B
156
THE ROMANS.
[ciiAr. XII.
first doubled, with a lobe, and then twisted round into the fonn
n;presented in fig*. 4 in our cut. The example here p:iven was
tbund in Northumberland, on the line of Hadrian's Wall, and
weig-hs about three-quarters of a pound.
The only part of the dress of tlie Eomans in Britain wliich
has come down to us entire, is the sandal or shoe {calif/a).
Many of these sandals, taken chiefly from the bed of tlie
Thames opposite London, were in the possession of Mr
Jloach Sinitli. They are of leather, of various sizes, and the
soles, formed usually of four layers of leather held tog'ether by
nails clenched on the inside, are cut as in our modern rii>iit-
and-left shoes. The layer of leather next to the sole of the
foot is close sewn to the lower portions, and then forms an
exterior ridge, from which, at the sides, rise strong loops for
fastening the sandals over the instep with straps or fillets. In
nearly all instances this ridge folds a little way over, and
protects the extremities of the toes. Other examples, appar-
ently intended for women and children, have reticulated work,
also in leather, round the heels and sides, of various degrees of
fineness, and more or less elegant in design. Three of these
shoes, or sandals, are here given, from the collection of Mr.
Eoach Smith. The first of these has its upper-leather made in
two pieces, and sewed at the toes and at the heel. In the
Sandal, seven inches long by three wide.
second, the upper-leather, which covered the foot up to the
ankle, was sewed at the heel only, and appears to have been
tied or laced up the front with a thong. The third example is
constructed somewhat difterently from the othei's in the up])er
part, as the latchets were intended to tie over the instep, and
not fasten with a thong. In this case, the layers of the sole
are preserved quite perfect, with the nails Avhich held them
criAp. xii.]
ROMAN SANDALS.
3);
togetlier. In otlier examples, the heads of the nails are flat
instead of pointed. The Roman sandals found in Britain have
Sandal, ten inches long, by three and a half wide.
the soles almost always covered with nails, which are often veiy
larg-e and clumsy, thoug-h sometimes, as in those found in the
tombs at York and Avisford, smaller and finer. In these nails
Sandal, nine inches long, by three wide.
wc have another link between tlie manners of Roman Britain
and those of Italy. Pliny, describing- the scales of a peculiar
fish, tells us that they resemble tlie nails of sandals ; * and
Juvenal, alluding to the profusion of nails with which the sole
of the caliga was covered, says : —
Dignum erit ergo
Declaniatoris niulino corde Vagelli,
Quuiu duo crura habeas, oflFendere tot caligas, tot
Millia clavoruiii. — Sat. xvi., 1. 22.
The sandals are here used to represent the soldiers who woie
* ' Squamis oonspicui crebris atque pcracutis, clavorum calij?aruui
efhgie.'— P/i>^ Hist. Nat. hb. ix. c. 18.
398 . THE EOMAXS. [chap. xii.
tliein, and we know that the calig'a was the proper shoe of tlie
military. The nailed soles from the tombs just alluded to
liclonged no doubt to the shoes of ladies ; but the upper cover-
ing, whether of leather or other still more perishable material,
is no longer remaining, and Ave cannot even guess at its form.
The shoe {calccus or calceamentnm) , worn by the better classes
of society, appears to have differed little in form from those
made in modern times ; they vvere of different colours, and of
various materials. The ladies, and even men of fashion, appear
to have worn them of linen, or silk, and sometimes ornamented
with jewellery : the shoes of a female in a picture at JI?r"ub-
neum are painted yellow.
Among the Roman antiquities found in this island, mstrn-
ments of the toilette are by no means unfrcquent. Amon;;
these was the mirror, or speculum, which consisted usually o( n
round plate of polished metal, set in a frame of the same shape,
with a handle. For, when used, it was held up to the person
using it by a servant. Several such mirrors of polished metal
have been found in the cemeteries at Colchester ; and one,
found in an extensive Eoman burial-place near J)everill-street,
Southwark, is engraved in the twenty-sixth volume of tlie
' Archseoloo-ia.' Thev are usuallv small ; those found at Col-
Chester were between three and four inches in diameter. I am
not aware that any other description of Roman mirror has been
met with in this country ; rare examples of square ones have
been found in Italy, and we know that the Romans used
mirrors of glass, and that they even placed large mirrors on
their walls and ceilings.
The Roman comb {peden) was usually toothed on both sides,
and the common material in Italy was box-wood. This was
so generally the case, that Martial, speaking ironically of the
uselessness of such an instrument in the hands of a woman ivho
was bald, adopts the name of the wood for the cond) : —
Quid faciei nullos hie inventura capillos,
Multifido buxus quae tibi dente datuv ?
Ep.^ lib. xiv. 2o.
Bone and metal were also used. The museum of Mr Roach
Smith contains fragments of Roman combs in wood and bone
found in London. In one of the Roman rubbish pits at
Chesterford in Essex, a comb of bronze, with a double row of
teeth, was found. It is now in the museum of Lord Bray-
brooke, at Audley End, who also possesses a similarly shaped
CHAV. x:i.l THE TOILETTE; LOCKS AND KEYS.
399
K(jinaii comb of iron, found on the site of the railway station
at Cliesterford. Small tweezers {volsellcs) are also frequently
met with among- the Roman remains in this country, and
evidently formed a necessary part of the toilette of the ladies ;
their use, no douht, was to pluck superfluous hairs from th(i
body. Small articles in bronze have been dug up at Cirencester
and elsewhere, which, from their form, appear to have been
used for cleansing- and dressing the nails.
We have very few remains that throw any light on the man-
ner in which the houses of the Romans in Britain were furnish-
ed, ajid we can only assume, from the resemblance iu other
things, that the fashions of Italy, in this respect, also prevailed
liere. It has been already stated that the not uufrcquent
occurrence, in the remains of Roman houses, of walls which
seem to run into apartments, and of projections at the lower
parts of the walls internally, would induce us to suppose that
these were intended to serve permanently as seats. Move-
able furniture was generally made of perishable materials, and
consisted of articles least likely to be left among the ruins of
the houses when abandoned. The only article of this descrip-
tion that I can call to mind as having been fourid in Britain,
was the metal frame of a folding seat found in one of the
Bartlow hills. From the great number of keys of all sizes,
which are found scattered about the floors of Roman houses
when they are excavated, there must have been many chests,
colters, and caskets witli locks, independently of the locks of
the doors. Three rather common forms of keys are given in
the annexed cut, taken from examples found in London. The
Romiin Keys.
400
THE ROMANS.
[chap. XII.
interment of small caskets of this kind in [graves has been,
in some instances, traced by the existence of decayed wood,
and the presence among it of ornamental nails and fragments
of metal. Several Koman locks, mostly of bronze, have been
found in the cemeteries at Colchester, of which one of the most
perfect is represented in the cut below. The plate of this lock
was four inches broad by two and three-quarters deep, and it
lias evidently belonged to a chest. Tlie key-hole was covered
by a guard, as in modern locks of the same description. The
forms of Roman keys are so extremely varied that it would be
difficult to give any notion of them in a general description.
They are most commonly, especially the smaller ones, of bronze.
]\Iany resemble closely the keys of the present day. Others
present fanciful shapes, with a good deal of ornament. One
form of key, of very frequent occurrence, evidently intended to
be placed on the finger like a ring, is represented in our cut.
The ring is at right-angles to the axle of the key, Avhich is
always very short. These keys are generally so small and
delicate, that they can only have been used for locks of small
caskets, which required the least possible force to turn them.
The larger keys are often of iron, and they are sometimes found
of a form resembling our modern latch-keys, and were no doubt
used in the same manner. Two of these Roman latch-lveys,
found at Colchester, are represented in our cut ; they are both
Roman Lock and Keys, from Colchester {Camulodioium).
of iron, the upper example eight inches long, and the other five
inches and a half, so that they probably belonged to doors.
Similar latch-keys were found in the Roman villa at Hartlip in
Kent.; and they have been met with elsewhere on Roman sites
CHVP. XII.] COOKING UTENSn.S. 401
in this country. The padlock was also in use amonp; th(
Homans, who termed it sera pensllls, a hang'ing lock ; it was
formed not like those at present in use, but somewhat like the
cylindrical locks, which were in more g-eneral use some years
ago, but are now becomino- obsolete.
It has already been shown how the Koman houses were
warmed by means of hypocausts, and no traces have yet been
found of fire-places in the interior of the rooms. We know,
however, that in the south, the Romans had portable fire-places,
or braziers, of metal, which they could bring into the room
when wanted, and which might be used equally for warming
the guests, or for keeping warm the plates or viands ; and we
would fain believe that the exhortation of Horace, —
Dissolve frigus, linga super foco
Large reponens, —
was as applicable in Britain, as in the land of the snow-clad
Soracte. The appeals so frequently repeated in the Roman
writers, that people should amai-e focos,\oYn their fire-sides, and
that they ^\\o\\\.(l piignare pro focis et am, fight for their hearths
and altars, had doubtless some substantial foundation in the
manners of the people. Mr Roach Smith has given an engrav-
ing in the second volume of his ' Collectanea ' of a pair of
andirons, or fire-dogs, of iron, discovered in 1839, in a sepul-
chral vault at Mount Bures, near Colchester. Each consisted of
a frame, the two upright sides of which were crowned witli
heads of oxen, with a brass knob on the tip of each horn. Two
very similar implements, also of iron, had been found near
Shefford, in Bedfordshire, in 1832, and. an engraving of them
has also been given by Mr Roach Smith. Articles of the same
character, but smaller, have been found at Pompeii, and in a
tomb at Paestum. The Italian antiquaries seem to consider
that they were used, not like the mediaeval fire-dogs, to support
the fuel, but that they were cooking utensils, intended to
support iron bars to serve as a gridiron over the fire for cooking-
meat. The two fire-dogs found near Shefford terminated in
stags' heads. The gentleman who found them, Mr Inskip of
Shefford, has given the following account of the discovery,
which seems to confirm the opinion of the antiquaries of Italy : —
' I employed two men,' he says, ' to dig on the spot, and w(;
quickly found an iron fire-dog of simple construction, and
doubtless used by the Romans for cooking. After this we met
with a stout iron-bar, one end of which was curved somewhat
402 THE ROMANS. [chap. xii.
like a pump-sweep or handle, having a hole thronuh it at the
ends ; for this I could at first assign no apparent use. T dug-
further, and found a second fire-dog, a duplicate of the former ;
they were both in a small degree mutilated, yet 1 was led to
admire the grace and spirit with which all articles of Roman
manufacture were executed. Their designs are still more
striking; and, even in these homely utensils, the imitations of
nature are of the boldest order ; the graceful turn of the stag's
neck, and the outline of the head, which form the ornamental
part of each end, are singularly effective ; and it is a matter of
admiration, the simplicity of contrivance in these fire-dogs for
cooking the greatest quantity of victuals at one and the same
fire. To eftect this, the bar before alluded to was laid longitudi-
nally on one side of the stag's head ; betwixt that and one of his
horns, another bar lay parallel, on the opposite side ; from both
of which descended two rows of hooks, to supply the means of
boiling or roasting, the curved ends of the bars having holes
tlirough each of them, into which might be thrust pivots of
iron so contrived, that upon necessitous occasions, they wouhl
form four bars, and thus multiply the means of making the
most of one fire. The end of each bar also turned up grace-
fully as a hook, from which might depend additional pots and
kettles.' Mr Inskip's explanation may perhaps be altogether
fanciful ; but it is remarkable that an utensil undoubtedly
intended for cooking was found at the same place. This was an
iron tripod, consisting of three curved legs turning on a swivel
at the top, under which w^as fixed a massive iron ring, Neai-
it was found a chain and pot-hooks, which evidently belonged
to the ring at the top of the tripod.
We have other examples of such tripods used by the llomans
to support culinary vessels over the fire ; but a great portion
of their cooking appears to have been performed on stoves, and
the few supposed culinary vessels that have been found in this
country partake rather of the character of saucepans and frying-
pans than of kettles. The vessels found in Britain most de-
cidedly belonging to the Roman kitchen are the earthenware
mortaria already described, and metal as w^ell as earthenware
strainers or colanders. The former were used for pounding or
mincing meats and vegetables, and, from the profusion in which
they are found, seem to show that the Romans in Britain were
very partial to made dishes. The strainer (colnm) was used in
Italy for many purposes, the chief of which was that of cooling
wine. This sort of strainers wei'e called cola uivaria ; they
CHAP. XII.] KITCHEN UTENSILS. 4C3
were formed like basins, and filled Avitli snow or ice, and tlie
wine was passed throuo-li them. Those found in this country
consist generally of a rather deep bowl, perforated with small
holes, and a long handle, and were evidently intended for taking
cooked meats, &c., out of the boiler, without carrying the water
with them— in fact, a ladle and strainer combined. Utensils of
this kind were termed tnta or tridla. They are found not
unfrequently in this island. One was foimd at Chesteiford, in
Essex, in 1847, with the bowl partly filled with brass coins.
One, exactly similar, even in pattern, and of the same material
(bronze), was found some years ago at Whitfield, in Northum-
berland, along with three kettles or boilers, resembling camp-
kettles, which were evidently intended to be placed over a fire.
They are all now preserved in the museum at Newcastle-upon-
Tyne. The kettles are also of bronze, but of extremely thin
metal, so that they would readily feel the fire. They have been
patched in several places. One of them has three feet to stand
upon, which was a form of boiler invented to supersede the use
of a simple pot placed over the fire upon a tripod.
A general description has already been given of the earthen-
ware used for culinary and other dcm.estic purposes ; but it
would be extremely difficult to point out the purposes for which
each particular form of vessel was designed, though it is pro-
bable that most of them were intended for the table. The
m.ortarinm, as I have just stated, belonged peculiarly to the
kitchen. The mnpliora was used to contain wine, and also
olives, oil, or honey. The amphora contained these articles in
large bulk, and occupied the place of our modern barrels ; the
liquids were served at table in the ampulla, or bottle, which
was made of earthenware or glass, and was always distinguished
by its narrow neck and swollen body. Hence the term ampulla
was applied metaphorically to anything swollen, even to turgid
language ; for Horace talks of —
ampullas et sesquipedalia verba.
The other description of earthen vessel, which had the mouth
not much less wide, or even wider, than the body, was desig-
nated by the general term of olla, pot or jar. The olla had
sometimes a lid ; it was used to hold solids rather than liquids,
but it was often made large, to be placed on the fire for culinary
purposes. Great quantities of vessels, answering all these
descriptions, are found among the Roman remains in Britain.
They are sometimes nuide of bronze, with verv eles-antlv orna-
404
THE EOMAXS.
[ciiAP, xir.
mented liandles. Another article beloni>'iiii>- to the Uomnn
kitchen was the quern, or handmill, for o-rimlino- corn. Jt
consisted of a couple of round stones, one forniinfi; a sort o\
socket to tiie other, and by turning the upper one round, the
corn Avas pounded — a rude method of manufacturing" meal.
Corn appears to have been kept in the house in grain, and to
have been thus ground by the hand whenever it was necessary
to bake. These stone querns are found frequently on Eoraan
sites in this country. In the back-yard of one of the houses of
ancient Tsurium (Aldboroitf///, in Yorkshire), represented in our
plate at p. 193, the querns were found in the situation in
which they had been used.
Among other articles which belonged to the culinary depart-
ment of the Roman house was the water-cock {epistomium) .
It is an article, as might be expected, of not very frequent
occurrence ; but Mr Roach Smith possesses, among his nmner-
ons relics of Roman London, an ornamental bronze water-cock,
which issues from the moutli of a dog's head. It is rather a
singular combination of names, that it Avas i'ound in excavations
in Philpot Lane, Penchurch Street.
Before we leave the kitchen, Ave must speak of a class of
remains intimately connected with its purposes. Attached to
Roman vilhis and towns, we invariably find large heaps of the
remains of provisions, consisting especially of the shells of fish
and of the bones of animals. These organic remains are Avorthy
of study in many points of vicAV ; they make ns acquainted
with the various classes of animal food consumed by the Romano-
Rritish population of our island : and they are particularly
interesting to the naturalist, from the circnmstance that they
show the existence of some animals — such as the bos longifroun
— Avhich haA^e now long been extinct. The proximity of Roman
sites is almost always shown by the presence of immense quan-
tities of oyster- shells, Avhich shoAv that there Avas a great con-
sumption of oysters in Roman Britain ; and the shells of cockles
and mussels are also abundant. It has been supposed that the
Romans fed snails as delicacies for the table, and it is a curious
circumstance, that a large species of snail is often found still
existing about I'oman stations. In excaA'atiiig on Roman sites,
large quantities of shells of snails are not unfrequently found ;
at Lymne, in Kent, {Portus Lemcnms), I have seen them dug
\ip at the foundations of the walls, in masses almost as large as
ordinary buckets, and completelv embedded together. The
snails may, hoAvever, have thus collected together in such places
CHAP. XII.] AXIMAL REMAINS. 405
at «T much more recent period than tliat Avith which tlicir con-
nexioa with the ruins around w^ouhl seem to identify them.
Among- tlie animal remains found among relics of the Roman
period in Colchester are horns of a short-horned ox, of the stag,
and of a very large goat, as well as of the hos lovgifrons, jnst
mentioned, a species of ox named from the length of its frontal
hone, which is found by geologists among fossil remains, but
which does not exist at present ; bones of the ox. sheep, and
goat ; jaws, teeth, and tusks of wnld hogs ; and teeth and jaws
of dogs, and apparently of wolves. The different forms of tlie
horns discovered in ditierent localities show that there must
have been many varieties of oxen in Britain. The bones and
horns of animals found with lioman remains in London include
the bos longifroufi, sheep, goats, deer, and swdne. A deep pit
attached to the Eoman villa at Hartlip, in Kent, contained a
large quantity of the bones of the sheep, hog, horse, and also
of the bos longifrons. In a Eoman villa at Dursley, near Glou-
cester, were found remains of the hoi'se, stag, fox, wild boar,
liares, rabbits, mice, wild ducks, chickens, goats, pigs, sheep,
kids, lambs, rooks, and small birds, cats, polecats, and of a
small kind of ox. The Rev. Mr Layton, of Sandwicli, who
watched the opening of the rubbish pits at Richborough, furn-
islied Mr Roach Smith with the following account of the
animal remains found there : — ' The major part consists of tlu;
common bones of tlie ox, sheep, and roebuck- -especially the
first. , [ have seen one head also of the ox, with the frontal
bone broken through, as if with a pole-axe, just as by a butcher
of the present day. It may be noticed, too, that the oxen and
sheep were small when compared with ours ; and one is pleased
with finding the account of Tacitus, in his "Germany," ( pecorimi.
fecnnda, sed plerHinqne improcera,) so Avell illustrated by tin;
dirt-pits of Richborough.' A great variety of animal bones
are found at Wroxeter [Urlconinm). Pieces of the horns of
deer and other animals are found sawed off, no doubt for the
])urpose of manufacturing the different articles Avhich were
abundantly made of such materials. Boars' tusks are often
found fitted up for ornaments, and sometimes apparently
designed to be suspended on the person, or to the horse — per-
haps tropics of the chase.
An article found very frecjuently on the sites of Roman
buildings is the small bell {t'mt'mnabuli(m), which was probably
used to sunnnon the slaves and attendants when their services
were vvanted. These bells are as frequently scpiare as round.
40G
THE ROMANS.
[chap. xir.
and are usually made of bronze. One, in tlie cabinet of ]Mr
Koacli Smith, is so well preserved, that it still produces a clear
and sliarp sound ; it was found in the ruins of one of the house:;
of Eoman London.
Another article of very frequent occurrence is the lamp
{Incerna), made usually of terra-cotta. It has been already
stated that lamps are frequently found in sepulchres. They
were also used in liiihtino* houses, apparently in considerable
profusion, and it is evident that it would require a considerable
number to illuminate a room effectively. In one corridor of
the public baths of Pompeii, upwards of five liundred lamps
were found ; and in the course of excavating- the different parts
of the same buildinp;, more than a thousand were collected
The terra-cotta lamp is usually circular, from two inches and a
half to three inches in diameter, with a projecting- spout for the
wick. A hole, or two holes, in the circular body, allowed the
air to pass, and the spout was sometimes double or treble, to
admit of two or three separate wicks. The annexed cut repre-
s(!nts two examples of terra-cotta lamps, selected from several
I
Koman Laui^js, frum Co'cbe.ster {CajuHiudtniKii.).
loinid at Colchester. The field, often plain, is, however, fre-
([uently ornamented with figures, which are no less varied and
interesting- than those on the red Samian pottery. Our tw(^
examples represent a centaur carrying an amphora of wine, and
what appears to be a fuller at work. Others have theatrical
masks, busts, mythological figures, gladiatorial subjects, domestic
arid sometimes licentious scenes, &c. Mr Eoach Smith has
CHAP. XII.]
L.\MrS; HOUSEHOLD GODS.
407
several examples of a terra-ootta lamp, on which is the repre-
s(^iitation of a mill for g-riiuling corn, turned by an ass, one of
which is here given in a cut. Lamps made of metal, usually
Roman Lamp, from London.
bronze, are of rarer occurrence. One, in Mr Smith's museum,
which was taken from the Tham.es, has been made from a
bronze cup, of a very eleg-ant pattern, by breaking- in one side
and adding a spout. An engraving of this carious relic is
given in the Archseological Album. When used for domestic
purposes, the lamp was placed on a little disc, raised on a shaft
— a candelabrum. The York Museum contains two leaden
stands with handles, evidently intended for carrying lamps
about the house without the risk of dropping the oil. The
metal lamps, which have frequently fanciful and grotesque
forms, were often suspended by chains, or by a rod. One of
these, with the rod which suspended it, was fouiul in one of the
J^artlow hills.
Among the articles of household furniture peculiar to the
llomans, there is one class which deserves particular notice.
1'hese are the images oi' the household gods, the penates and
lares, which answered in some respect to our niediseval fairies.
They were supposed to watch over the prosperity of the house
and its occupants, and visitors were in the habit of saluting
them, for which purpose their images were placed in the house
in conspicuous places. When iEiieas had first experiencetl
hospitality on the shores of Italy, he is represented as paying
his respects to the household gods : —
Hesternumque larem, parvosque penates
Lyetus adit. — Virgil^ ^n. viii. 543.
408 THE ROMAXS. [cHvr. xii.
Tliey were called tlie little deities (dU viliint'.), and it was usual
to propitiate theiu with oft"erini>-s of the remnants of provisions,
or other small articles, a custom to which Juvcmul refers in tlie
following lines : —
O parvi nostrique lares, quos thure minuto,
Aut farre, et tenui soleo exorare corona. — Sat. ix. 137.
In accepting sncli offerings they were supposed to exhibit a
sort of goodfellowship towards the people of the house, and in
this resembled the brownies and cluricaunes of modern times.
They were supposed to show themselves at times in various
forms, often of a grotesque description, and sometimes as animals,
such as dogs, and even as serpents. A bronze figure of a lar,
or household god, found at Hercnlaneum, represents him as a
little old man sitting on the ground, with his knees up to his
chin, a large head, ass's ears, a long beard, and a droll roguish
face. There can be little doubt that many of the numerous
bronze images of the Roman period found in tliis country were
intended for such household gods. Others probably owed their
existence to the same love of ornament which loads our chimney-
pieces with figures in plaster or porcelain. Others, again, of
the smaller bronze images, were probably mere toys — play-
things for children. We must distinguish from all these the
bronze statuettes of the lloman deities, which are also not
unfrequent, and which were perhaps placed in some corner ot"
the house set apart for private worship.
The traces of the domestic occupations of the female part of
the household, found among Roman remains in Britain, are
not very numerous. Much of their time was probably em-
ployed in spinning and weaving. In Mr Roach Smith's
nmseum may be seen a number of small implements of wood,
found in excavations in the city of London, which, from the
circumstance that when brought to light the remains of wool
were still attached to them, were no doubt used in the manu-
facture of cloth. Needles for sewing are of frequent occurrence.
Several are in the collection of Mr Roach Smith. One, made
of bone, and found at Richborough, is represented in our cut
in p. 393. The Roman scissors {forfex) was usually of the form
still common among clothiers ; an example, found at Rich-
borough, is represented in the accompanying cut. A more com-
])lete example, but differing somewhat in shape, is engraved in Mr
J^ee's ' Ronian Antiquities of Caerleon.' Scissors of the same
construction as those now in common use are also fouiul, but
CHAT. XII.]
SCISSORS AND KXIVE«.
40!>
much less frequently. Our cut presents also some of tlie
commoner forms of lloman knife-blades found in this country ;
they are all represented one-fourth of the real size. The kniCci
Knives and Scissors, from Richborougb.
\cu.Uer) wat; generally straight on the cutting" edge, and curved
on the back. These probably have had handles of wood ; but
they are not unfrequently found with bone handles, well
preserved. Several knives, with handles of bone, are in tlie
imiseum of Mr Eoach Smith ; some of which have the ring at
the end, like that in our example to the left in the cut, just
escaping from the handle. This ring was no doubt intenchxl
for suspending the knife to the girdle. Juvenal, when describ-
ing the frugality of his country-house, speaks of bone handh.'s
to knives as a nuirk of poverty : —
Adeo nulbi uncia nobis
Yj>t eboris, nee tessellse, nee calculus ex bac
Materia ; quin ipsa nianubria cultelloruiu
Ossea.— *S«^. xi. 131.
The handle (cnjj/dus) was often made of bronze, and verv
elegantly ornamented. It not unfrequently terminated in the
head of an animal ; in an example in the possession of Mr
lloach Smith it is the head of a horse, while in two found at
Caerleon and York it is that of a dog. lloman clasp-knives are
by no means unconnnon ; and one sliape of hantlle, represe.iting
410
THE ROMANS.
[chap. XII.
a dog in close pursuit of a hare, seems to have been a great
favourite, from the numerous examples which have been found
in this country. The one given in the annexed cut was found
The Handle of a Clasp-knife. ,
at Iladstock, in Essex, and is now in the museum of the Lord
i5ra>H>rooke, at Audley End ; it has the remains of the steel
blade shut into the handle. It is here represented the size of
the original, Two, exactly similar, Avere found at Eeculver, in
Kent {Regidblum) ; and another at Kenchester, in Hereford-
shire {Magna). Mr Smith possesses what appears to be a
Roman fork, and I believe that other examples of that instru-
ment have been found. There is, also, in Mr Smith's collection,
a steel for sharpening knives, taken from Roman London,
exactly resembling those used by butcliers at the present day,
and still retaining the ring by which it was suspended to the
girdle.
Spoons, of different shapes and sizes, are also of frequent
occurrence. The one with the larger bowl {cocJdem') has almost
always a handle terminating in a point, and illustrates the
epigrammatic description in Martial, who speaks of it as being
applied to two purposes, for picking periwinkles or snails out
of the shell (with the pointed end), or for eating eggs (with the
bowl) —
Sum cochleis habilis, sed nee minus utilis ovis,
Nuniquid scis pocius cur cochleare vocer ?
Mart'ml, Ep. xvi. 121.
The bowl of ihe cochlear is more usually circular than oval.
One found at Reculver was made of silver, but they are gener-
ally of bronze. The two examples of the diminutive spoon
{I'ljjuld), given from Mr Eolfe's collection of Eichborough
antiquities, in the accompanying cut (tigs. 1 and 3), are also of
bronze. It is not easy to explain the exact purposes of these
last-mentioned articles, but they have been supposed to be
ciiAr. XII.] SPOONS AND STYLT. 411
designed for taking" ointments or prepared oils out of long-
necked bottles.
^ ^=^Si^.^:m^::::^^
izzj-nr^'innT
:2J30=
Ligulae and a Stylus.
The article between the ligulae in the last cut (tig. 2) is an
example of the Roman stylns, used for writing on the waxed
tablet {tabula). The tablet was composed of two or more thin
pieces of wood, fastened at the back with wires, like a book.
Wax was spread over the wood internally, and on this the
person nsing it wrote with the pointed end of the stylus. The
Hat end was used for erasing what had been written, and
smoothing the wax for writing again. Hence vertere stylum,
to turn the stylus, for the purpose of erasing and correcting
what had been ill or incorrectly written, became a proverbial
expression : —
Siepe stylum vevtas, iterum quae dig'na leg^i sint
Scripturus ; neque te ut miratur turba labores,
Contentus paucis lectoribus —
says the poet Horace {lib. i., Sat. x., 72). It is from the
same usage that we derive the modern word style, applied pri-
marily to the character of a man's writing, and thence to other
characteristics. A painting, found in Herculaneum, represents
a lady with a stylus, closely resembling the one in our cut, in
her right hand, and the tablet in her left. The tablet and its
styli was a very necessary article in the houses of educated
people, for, among other purposes, it served for that of letter-
M'riting. The letter was written upon the wax, the tablet was
then closed and tied with a thread and sealed, and so dis-
patched to the person to whom it was addressed, w'ho could rub
it out, and write the answer on the same tablet, which was
then returned to its original owner. Hence, wdien one of
Plautus's characters wants to write a letter, he calls for a tablet,
stylus, wax, and thread* —
EfFer cito stylum, ceram, et tabellas, et linuni.
Bacchld.^ iv. 4, 64.
This accounts for the number of styli which are found in all
2 c
412
THE ROMANS.
[chap. XII.
Roman sites in Britain. They are usually of bronze. As the
tablet was made of more perishable materials, it is seldom
found : but Mr Eoach Smith possessed two leaves of these
tablets, made of wood, found in London, from which however
the wax has perished. One of them, which was an outside
cover, is represented in tl\e accompanying cut ; the leaves had
been threaded to^-ether by two
holes nmuino- throuu'h one side,
and the marks of the string- or
thong which tied it are distinctly
visible. Other instruments, bear-
ing some analogy to the stylus, are
also frequently found on Eoman
sites, especially in London, Avhich,
from a comparison with the tools
used at the present day by sculp-
tors, appear to be modelling tools.
Among instruments connected
with the Eoman arts in Britain, we
Leaf of a Tablet, from London. j^^,g|^ ^^^t overlook the compass
(eircimis). Two Eoman compasses have been found at Ciren-
cester, exactly representing those in use at the present day,
and an engravuig of one of them will be found in Buckmau
and Newmarch's work on ancient Corinium. Similar instru-
ments have been found on other Eoman sites.
The steelyard {statera or trut'md) is also frequently met with
among other Eoman antiquities found in this island, and bears a
perfect i-esemblance to those now in use. The two examples given
in our cut on the next page were found at Eichborough. A
weight, found in the same place, is attached to one of them.
The weights are ahvays more or less ornamental ; they often
Roman Steelyard Weights.
CHAP. XII.]
STEELYARD; STRIGILS.
413
consist of lii^lily-finished busts of emperors, or disting-uishecl
personao'es, deities, or fabulous heroes, or of fig'iires of birds
and animals. Three examples are given in the cut ; the first,
representing a dog's or wolf's head ; the second, a female bust ;
and the third, a bust of Diana. On another example of tlu;
statera, found at Richborough, the yard is notched into frac-
tional divisions, and is furnished with two hooks. In ex-
amples found at Pompeii, sometimes a hook, at others a scale,
is suspended at the end of the yard.* Scales {libra, hllaux)
Roman Steelyards, from Richborougli {Rulitp'uc
were also in use among the llomans from a ver\ early period,
and are often figured on coins and other works of art, but tliey
are rarely met with in antiquarian excavations in this country.
Among other miscellaneous articles in use among the Ro-
mans in Britain, strigils are not unfrequently found, an addi-
tional proof how extensively the manners of Italy had been
translated to our clime. The strigil was a curved instrument,
generally of bronze or iron, with which the bather in the hot
baths, after having been put into a profuse sweat, was scraped —
somewhat in the manner that ostlers scrape a horse when he
comes in hot. While this operation was performed, the patient
sat upon a seat which was under the water — a seat of this
kind is generally discovered in baths in Roman villas in
Britain. Sometimes the bather performed the operation him-
* Vitruvius pives us the names for the different constituent parts of the
Roman steelyard : — the scale [lancula]^ hanginji: from the head {caput),
near which was the point of revolution {centrum), and the handle (anso) ;
on the other side of the centre from the scale was the beam {scopu,s)^ with
Ihe weig-ht or equipoise {requlpo)i(Ui()ii), which was made to move alonj--
llio ]«)ints {per puiictn) expressinp: the different weis,-hrs.
It should be observed that in the upper tigure in our cut. thn steelyard
is turned the wrong: way up.
41 1 THE ROMANS. [chap, xii
self, 1)ut if lie Avas rich enough he had a slave for the purpose.
Public baths were provided with strigils for the use of the
bathers ; but people of respectability had their own strigils at
home, which their slaves carried after them when they went to
bathe. Hence Persius, —
I, puer, et strigiles Crispini ad balnea defer. — Saf. v. 126.
This is sufficient to warn us against supposing that the dis-
covery of strigils among the remains of buildings, is any proof
that those buildings were batlis. Two strigils of bronze were
found in one of the Bartlow tumuli, which resemble the
generality of those found in Italy, in having a hole in the
handle through which the hand was passed in using them. One
of the same material found at Reculver, in Kent, more than a
century ago, and engraved in Mr Roach Smith's ' Antiquities
of Richborough,' had a straight handle to grasp in the haiid.
This latter discovery furnishes a remarkable instance of the
danger of forming hasty opinions on such objects, without the
previous knowledge arising from careful comparison. An
antiquary of the time, Aubrey, Avho examined the bronze
strigil found at Reculver, immediately judged it to be one of
the golden sickles with which the British Druids cut their
mistletoe ! * The strigil had, indeed, a sharp edge turned
inward, which might lead a person ignorant of its real use to
suppose that it was a cutting instrument. The operation of
being scraped with it could not have been an agreeable one ;
and we are told that the emperor Augustus was subjected to
considerable suffering by an over-violent application of the
strigil. It was on this account customary to soften the edge by
the application of oil.
We find fewer remains of Roman weapons and armour in
Britain than almost any other article. As I have observed
before, it is more than probable that the bronze swords whicli
have been usually described as British, are purely Roman. Tlie
same may be said of the bronze spear-heads. A considerable
number of spear-heads and arrow-heads of iron were found in
the Roman camp on Hod Hill, in Dorsetshire. They are foimd
also from time to time on other Roman sites. A few fragments
of what is supposed to be Roman armour, formed both of
scales and of rings, have also been found, and some remains of
* It is remarkable tbat the Roman bronze, under certain circumstanres,
especially when it has lain in the water where it was subjected to friction,
bears an extraordinary resemblance to gold.
CHAP. XII. ] SPURS. 41.5
military standards. Very remarkable remains of one of the
latter articles were found near Stoney Stratford at tlie beg'innini::
of the present century, and have been eno-raved and published
by Samuel Lysons. A mono; the extensive Eoman remains
found in tlie camp at Hod Hill, already alluded to, were
several spurs of iron, wliich resemble so closely tiie Norinau \/
pricic-spurs, that they might be easily mistaken for them. J
suspect that many of the prick-spurs which have been found oi
or near Roman sites, and hastily judged to be Norman, are,
especially when made of bronze, Roman. As far, however, as
comparison has yet been made, the Roman and the Saxon spurs
are sliorler in the stimulus than those of the Normans.
416 . THE ROM.VXS. [chap, xil
CHAPTER Xlll.
The lloman Province — Its Divisions and Officers — the Military Force —
Centurial and other inscriptions — Towns and their Municipal Con-
stitution— the Coinage — Roman Coins relatinji: to Britain — Spurious
Coinage — Different methods of Hoarding Money.
The importance of Roman Britain is sliown by the circumstance
that it was constituted a separate province of the empire. From
the first, Britain was governed by a propraetor, who is stated, in
inscriptions, to have been a legatus Augusti, or viceg-erent of
the emperor, from which we are to conclude that it was a
province of the Caesar, and not a province of the people. At
tlie close of the Eoman occupation, when the ' Notitia Imperii '
was compiled, the o-overnor of Britain was called a vicarius, and
was honoured with the title of mr spectabills. It is at this
period only that we obtain any distinct information on the
political divisions of the province and on its officers, and these
had probably undergone considerable modifications. According
to the ' Notitia,' the province of Britain was divided into five
departments, called Britannia Prima, Britannia Secunda, Flavia
Caesariensis, Maxima Caesariensis, and Valentia. The first of
these consisted of the country to the south of the Thames and
the Bristol Channel ; Britannia Secunda answered to the
modern Principality of Wales ; Flavia comprised the middle
portion of the island, from the Thames to the Humber and the
Mersey ; the country beyond this, extending twenty-five miles
north of Hadrian's wall, formed the department of Maxima
Caesariensis ; while the lowlands of Scotland were comprised
under the title of Valentia. It is stated on the single and
dubious authority of Eichard of Cirencester, that the country to
the north of the Wall of Antoninus was formed into a sixth de-
partment under the name of Vespasiana. After the time of
Constantine, the first three were governed by presidents, while
CHAP. XIII.]- INTERNAL ADMINISTRATION. 417
the two northern departments were placed under the jurisdiction
of consulares. These officers were nnder the vicarius, who
probably resided in Londinium, or London.
The vicarins of Britain was himself subject to the pra^fectus
])raetovio Galliarum, who resided first at Treviri (Treiyes), and
afterwards at Arelatum {Aries). His official establishment con-
sisted of a prliiceps, or chief officer ; of two ag-ents (de scJiola
agentum in rebus), chosen out of the ducenaril, or judges; a
chief secretary {cor)iicidarius) ; * two accountants or auditors
{numerarios duos) ; a master of the prisons {commeutariensis) ;
a notary {ab act is) ; a srrr'^tary ^br despatches {curam episto-
larum) ; an assistant {adjutor) ; under assistants (subadjiwa) ;
clerks for appeal {exceptor es) ; seijeants, and other officers
{smgulares, et rellqnos qfjlciales') .■\ For the revenues of the
country, which were under the control of a supei'ior officer in
Gaul, entitled the comes sacrarum largitlonum, there were a
collector for the whole of Biitain {ratlonalis summarinn
Britanuiarum) ; an overseer of the Augustentian treasures in
Britain {praposltiis thesanrorum Augiistentimn m Brltanrdas) ;
procurators of the cynegia, or hunting establishment {procura-
tores cyne iorum) ; and another officer, entitled procurator
ci/negil in Britamna Biennensis. Under the count of the
private affairs of the western division of the empire {comes
rermn privatarum) was a collector of private affairs in Bi'itaiu
{rationalis rei privates per Britarmias). The militaiy affairs of
the province also came at this time directly under the manage-
ment of the government in Gaul, without the intermediation of
the vicarius, or governor, of Britain. They were divided
between three chief officers, the count of the Saxon shore
{comes Utoris Saxonici), the count of Britain {comes Britau-
'j/lar/fii/), and the duke of Britain {dux Britariniarum). The
garrisons of nine fortresses along the coast from Portchester to
J3rancaster in Norfolk, were placed under the command of the
first of these officers, who had an official establishment com-
posed of a chief officer from the office, or court; of the general
of foot in ordinary attendance {principein ex officio magistri
prcBsentalium a parte peditiim) ; two auditors {uumerarii) and a
* In a sepulchral inscription found near Great Chesters in Northumbci-
liind, a cornicularius is conniieuiorated, but whether he belonged to t\u)
departmental court, or not, is uncertain. — The inscription reads : — D . M .
AEL . MERCVKIALI COllNICVL TACIA SOROR FECIT.
t In tho interpretation of these various official titles I have chiefly
followed Horsley ; it is not easy to explain the exact duties of them all.
sf
418 THE HOMANS. ciiAr. xiii.
master of tlie prisons {comnwutarleiisis) from the same office ; a
secretary ; an assistant, and nnder-assistant ; a reg-isti-ar {reger-
eiidariiis) : clerks of appeals, Serjeants, and other officers.
The count of Britain had an official establishment exactly
similar, but apparently without any military command. The
duke of Britain had under his command the sixth leg-ion, which
was at Eburacum (For/c), where, probably, the duke held his
court, and all the g-arrisons in the north of Britain and along
the Wall of Hadrian. His official establishment consisted of
the same officers as the others.
This rather complicated system of officials, comoined with
the numerous secondary employes who must have been scattered
over the island, shows us the regularity of administration which
at this late period prevailed still in Eoman Britain. We have
no means of knowing the details of government, or the cha-
lacter or amount of the taxes which were raised from the island.
The military force, as we have before stated, was fixed soon
after its reduction to a province, at three legions, and it was
now reduced to two, the second and the sixth. These were
also, at the time of the composition of the ' Notitia ' (the
beginning of the fifth century), directly under the command of
the imperial government in Gaul. The military force in Britain
at this time has been estimated, from the information given in
the ' Notitia,' at nineteen thousand two hundred infantry, and
seventeen hundred cavalry.
This is the amount of the direct information we can at
present obtain relating to the internal administration of the
government in Britain and the amount of its military establish-
ment. The Eoman troops have fortunately left us abundant
memorials of their presence in the numerous inscriptions com-
memorating their burial, their religious worship, or their labours.
Both the legions and the auxiliary troops seem to have been
constantly employed in works of public utility, and the share
each legion, or cohort, or century took in them, is often indi-
cated by their names and titles inscribed on tiles or stones.
The latter are usually termed centurial stones, as they bear the
name of the centuria, or troop, by which the building or other
work, to which they were attached, was executed. This is often
expressed in the simplest possible form. Thus, a centurial
stone found near Cilurnum (^Chesters), in Northumberland, is
inscribed* —
* The words centurio and centuria are generally fi^'ured on the stones
by a niark which is here represented by a 0 reversed, but in reality it is
CHAP. XIII.]
CEXTURIAL STOXES.
419
COH V
0 CAECILI
PKOCOLI
The fifth cohort,
The century of Caecilius
Proculus.
Similar stones with sucli inscriptions as centvria peregrin i
CENTVRIA ARRII, CENTVRIA IIERENNIANI, COH VI D DELI-
viANA, are found frequently along the line of Hadrian's Wall,
and in Cumberland, and sometimes in other parts of the country.
Sometimes, especially in the legionary inscriptions, there is
more of ornament, the name being placed Avithin a wreath or
tablet, surrounded with the emblems of the legion and other
A Roman Legionary stone,
figures. One of these, found at Halton Chesters, in Northum-
berland (Himufim), is represented in the accompanying cut, and
js to be read thus, —
LKCr
II
AVG
F
Legion
the second,
the Augustan,
made it.
An inscription of this kind, found at Whitley Castle, in Nor-
thumberland, speaks of the rebuilding, or making again, of some
temple or other w^ork : —
VRX . LEG
XX vv
IIKFKC
A vexillation of legion
the twentieth, the valiant and
victorious,
remade it.
more like a > , though it was no douht intended for a o. A cut is given a
little further on which shows how oddly, at least at one period, the cutters
ul the Roman inscriptions joined letters together.
420 THE ROMANS. [chap. xiir.
Sometimes the name of the officer who directed the work is
added, as in the following- inscription found at Kisinghani
{Hahitancum) : —
COH , I . VANG The first cohort of the Vangiones
FF.ciT cviiANTK made it, under the direction of
IVL . PAYLLO TKIB Julius Paullus the tribune.
Ou a similar stone found at Rochester, in Northumberland
{Breiiienium), tlie name of the tribune only is given : —
p . AEL . ERAS Publius iEh'us
IX vs TiiiB Erasinus, the tribune.
The soldiers frequently dedicated their work to the reigning*
emperor, or contrived to introduce his name into the inscription.
Thus, along the line of the wall in Northumberland, inscriptions
to Hadrian are very frequent, which leave no doubt on our
mind that the g^eat military works there were executed under
that emperor. In the same manner the neighbourhood of tht;
more northern wall presents us with numerous inscriptions
commemorative of Antoninus. As an exam])le of the insci-ip-
tions to Hadrian along the Northumberland Avail, we may cite
the following, found at Milking-gap : —
IMP CAi:s TRAIAN Of the emperor Caesar Trajanus
HADRIANI AVG Hadrianus Augustus,
LEG II AVG the second legion, the Augustan,
A PLATORio NEPOTE LEG PR PR Auhis Platorius Nepos being legate
propraetor.
Similar inscriptions are found in other places in nearly the
same words. The inscriptions along the Antonine wall are
more precise, detailing the quantity of work performed in each
case by those who set np the inscription, and are often very
elaborately ornamented. They occur, moreover, in greater
numbers. The following was found at West-Kilpatrick : —
IMP. c To the emperor Csesar
T. AE. HADRIA Titus ^lius Hadrianus
NO. ANTONINO. AVG. PI. P. P. Antoninus Augustus Pius, father
of his country.
VEX A vexillation
LEG XX of the twentieth legion,
vv. FK the valiant and victorious, made
pp nil CDxi four thousand four hundred and
eleven paces.
In this instance the slab of stone is sculptured into the
representation of a Corinthian portico ; the emperor's name
CHAP. XIII.] IXSCRIITIOXS TO THE EMTERORS. 421
and titles ave inscribed on the tympanum ; the name of the
legion is placed within a wreath or garland, held by a winged
Victory between the supporting columns ; while the number of
paces is given at the foot, on each side of a boar, the ensign of
that legion.
Inscriptions of the reigning emperors, or commemorative of
tliem, are found in other places, Avhere they have originally
appeared on public buildings or other monuments. As we \m\v.
before had occasion to observe, the emperors' names were
always placed on the milllaria, or milestones. They are his-
torically important, as showing us the interest which the people
in this distant province took in all the changes and movements
of the Roman empire. We find now and then an inscription
to an emperor whose reign was so short and insignificant that
we could hardly suppose the influence of his name would have
been felt here. A fragment of an inscription to Numerianus,
on whicii remained the words imp c mar avr nvmeriano,
was found at Kenchester, in Herefordshire {^Maxjnd). Nume-
rianus was the brother of Carinus, and reigned conjointly with
him about two years (from 282 to 284). It is the only inscrip-
tion yet found in Britain in which his name occurs. At Castor,
m TS'orthampton shire {Durobriva), a cylindrical stone, appar-
ently a milliarium, was found with an inscription to Florianus,
the brother of the emperor Tacitus, who reigned not more than
two or three montlis, in a. D. 276. It is imperfect, but appears
to read as follows : —
IMP CAES To the emperor Caesar
M. ANXio Marcus Annius
FLOKiANO Florianus,
p. F. INVICTO the pious and faithful, unconquereJ,
AVG. the Augustus.
M. p. II Two miles.
An inscription found at Ancaster {Causemirp), commemorates
the emperor Constantine the Great (308 — 337) : — •
IMP c To the emperor Caesar
FL val Flavins Valerius
(;()NSTANTi> o Constantinus,
p F INV the pious and faithful, unconquered,
avg- the Augustus.
Divi of the deified
CONSTANTI Constantius,
Pii AVG the pious, the Augustus,
FiLio the son.
A milestone found in Cumberland was dedicated to Flavins
422
THE ROMANS.
[chap. XIII.
Julius Cri'^pus, a son of Coiistantine tlie Great, and therefore
l)eloi)ge(l to the earlier part of the fourth centnry. One found
near Old Carlisle was dedicated to the emperor Marcus Julius
Philippus, and is fixed l)y the mention of his consulship to the
year 247. Another, found near the Eoman road at Greta-
bri(li>-e, in Yorkshire, was dedicated to tlie emperors Gallus and
Yolusianus, in tlie year 252.
At Bittern, in Hampshire [Clausentnvi), no less than six
stones have been found with inscriptions to various emperors.
Three of these are dedicated to Gordinn the Younirer, to Gallus
and Volusiamis, and to Aurelian. The other three are all
dedicated to Tetricus, and are particularly interesting as beinu;
the only inscriptions yet found in ]^ritain to any of the local
usurpers, with the exception of one to Yictorinus, found near
Neath, in South Wales. It is remarkable that we have no such
memorial now remaining of Carausius or Allectus, although
they reigned during ten years, and their numerous coinage
proves that they were not neglectful of commemorating them-
selves. The want of inscriptions with their names can only be
explained by the great care which was probably taken to destroy
or erase them, after the island was restored to its dependence
on Home. There are several instances among the inscriptions
found in Britain of the erasure of the name of an emperor by
Inscription at Ctesters {Cilurnuni).
his successor or rival. An interesting inscription found at
Hexham had contained the name of Severus and his two sons,
1
CHAP. XIII.] THE VALUE OF IXSCRIPTiOXS. 423
l)ut tliat of Geta had been subsequently and carefully craved,
no doubt after that prince had been murdered by his brother,
(yaracalla. An inscribed slab was discovered some years ag-o at
Chesters, in Northumberland {Cllurnmn), of which a represent-
ation is given in the accompanying cut, and on wliich also
were clearly traced some intentional erasures. The inscription
may be given, by comparing and supplying from similar con-
temporary inscriptions, as follows : —
IMP CAES Marc avrei, . . .
AVG . . pont max
TiiiR P cos . . PP Divi Antonini fil
DIVI SEVER NEP
cvi:sAH iMPEii diiplares
alae II. AsToiivM teniplvm vetvstat conlapsum restifu-
ERVNT per MARivM VxVLERiAiiuni log', avg'. pr pr
INSTANTE SEPTIMIO NILO PRAK . . .
DEDICATVM III KAL J^OVEM GRATO ET SELEUCO COSS.
which may be translated : — To the emperor Marcus Aurelius
Augustus Pontifex Maxiinus, with the tribuuitian
power, fourth time consul, father of his country, son of divine
Antoninus, grandson of divine Severus, to Caesar our emperor
the duplares of the second wing of Asturians restored this
temple, through age dilapidated, by command of Marius Valeri-
anus, legate of the Augustus and propraetor, under the super-
intendence of Septimius Nilus the Prsefect. It was dedicated
on the third kalends of November (the 30th of October),
Gratus and Seleucus being consuls.
Mr Bruce, from whose work on the Eon^^an wall I take this
inscription, makes the following illustrative remarks, which
deserve to be impressed on the minds of all students of our
early antiquities. ' Hutton,' he observes, 'who has done such
good service to the wall, underrated the value of inscriptions.
" When the antiquary," says he, " has laboured through a parcel
of miserable letters, what is he the wiser? " Let this fractured
and defaced stone answer the question. 1. This dedication
was made by soldiers of the second wing of the Astures ; —
we thus learn the name of the people who garrisoned the fort,
and by a reference to the Notitia, ascertain with certainty that
this was Cilurnum. 2. We acquire the fact that a temple,
which through age had become dilapidated, was restored ; —
learning thereby, not only the attention which the Komans
paid to what they conceived to be religious duties, but their
long occupation of this spot. It has been already observed.
1^
424 THE ROMANS. [chap. xiii.
tliat some of the pillars of the hypocaust have been portions of
a prior building- ; — the ruin and inscription thus corroborate
each other. 3. The date of the dedication is given ; the third
of tlie kalends of November falls upon the thirtieth of October,
and the year which Gratus and Seleucus were consuls corre-
sponds to A. D. 221 ; — the data on which antiquaries found their
conclusions are not always so vao-ue as some imagine. 4. Even
the erasures are instructive. By a reference to the date, we
find that Ileliogabalus was reigning- at the time of the dedica-
tion of the temple ; we find that what remain of the names and
titles on the stone apply to him ; he, consequently, is the,
emperor referred to. The year following he was slain by his
own soldiers, his body dragged tlu'ough the streets, jind cast
into the Tiber. The soldiers in Britain seem to have sympa-
thised with their companions at Home, and to have erased the
name of the fallen emperor from the dedicatory slab. Human
nature is the same in every age. How often have we, in modern
times, seen a name cast out with loathing, which yesterday
received the incense of a world's fiattery ! ' *
This inscription also furnishes us with a name of a propraetor
or governor of E-oman Britain, who is not mentioned elsewhere.
Other inscriptions have added to our list of propraetors, or
confirmed the names of those who are mentioned in history.
Thus : —
Aulus Plautius, the first propraetor, who came over under tlie
emperor Claudius, is mentioned in an inscription found in Italy,
and published by Gruter.
Licinius Priscas, who governed Britain under Hadrian, is
commemorated in an inscription found at Bewcastle, in Cum-
berland, as well as on a monument found at Rome.
Lollius Urbicus, the celebrated propraetor of Antoninus Pius,
is mentioned in an inscription found in Scotland.
Platorius Nepos is mentioned as propraetor under Hadrian in
inscriptions found at more than one place along the line of the
Northumbrian wall.
C. Valerius Pansa occurs as holding the same office under
Trajan, in an inscription found at Novara, in Italy, published
by Muratori.
Virius Lupus, the propraetor of the emperor Severus, occurs
* It may be observed that this inscription affords a remarkably good
example of the combininji,- of letters together, technically called ligature,
bo common in Roman inscriptions, especially of this age.
CHAP. xiii.J MUNICIPAL TOWNS. 42o
in an inscription found at Ilkey, in Yorkshire {Ollcana), and
in anotlier found at Bowes {LavatrcB).
Claudius Xenoplion, whose date is doubtful, is mentioned in
an inscription found at Little Chesters, in Northumberland.
Marias Valerianus, under Heliogabalus, is mentioned in the
inscription g-iven above.
Maecilius Fuscus, propraetor under Gordian, occurs in an
inscription at Lanchester, in Durham.
(Inseus Lucilianus, propraetor under the same emperor, occurs
in another inscription found at the same place.
Claudius Paulinus, proprastor, is mentioned in an inscription
found near Caen, in Normandy, of the date of A. D. 240
Nonnius Philippus, propraetor also under Gordian, is men-
tioned in an inscription found at Old Penrith, in Cumberland,
and in anotlier at Old Carlisle, of the date 242.
As far as we can perceive, the military, civil, and fiscal
departments of the administration of Britain were united, at
first, in the office of the propraetor; but, as we have seen above,
after Constantine had divided the empire into four governments,
the different departments of administration in this island wei'c
each placed separately under the prgefect of the west in Gaul.
His vicar (vicar lus) had the manag'ement of the civil govern-
ment of the island. But there was another, and an independ-
ent jurisdiction, that of the towns, which it is of the utmost
importance we should not overlook. The very doubtful treatise
attributed to Richard of Cirencester, which, however, may pos-
sibly in this case offer us correct information, states that there
were in Britain two municipal towns (miauclpla), Verulamiuni
{St Albans), and Eburacum {York). The same authority enu-
merates nine coloiila, Londinium {Londori)^ Camulodunnm
{Colchester), Rutupiae {lllchhoroicgJi), Aquae Solis {BatJi), Isca
{Caerleon), Deva {C/ieste?'), Gleyum {Gloucester), Lindum {Lin-
coln), and Caraboricum {Cambridge) ; ten cities under the Latin
law {cloltates La tlo jure donates), Durnomagus, considered to be
another name for Durobrivae {Castor), Cataracto {Catterlck),
Cambodunnm (Slack), Coccium (Rlbchester), Luguballium (Car-
lisle), Vtoroion (Btcrgh-head), Victoria {Dealgln Ross), Theodosia
(Dumbarton), Ooxiniwrn (Cirencester) , Sorbiodunum (Old Sarmn);
and twelve stipendiary towns, of less consequence,* Venta
Silurian (Caerwent), Vonta Belgarum [JViuchester), Venta Iceno-
rnin {Calstor, near Norwich), Segontinin (Caer Segont), iMari-
* Delude xii. stipendiaric^e niinorisque nioiuenti.
426 THE llOMAXS. [chap. xiii.
(luniim {Cnermnrth(-;)i), Hatse {Lelceste)') , Caiitiopolis {Canter-
bnrij), Duriiiuin {IJorchestei'), Isca (Exeter), ]-5remeniiuu
{Rochester), Yiiidouum {m Ilam-ps/ilre), and Durobrivae (Jloch-
ester) .
In earlier times tlie colonize were the cities out of Italy
which possessed in tlie most perfect degree the rights of Eoman
citizens, but at a later period the vmuiclpla and colonia appear
to have been nearly identical with each other. The Latian
Liw was a uiodiHcation of the municipal privileges and forms,
which it is not necessary here to enter upon. The stipendiary
towns are said to have been distinguished by the payment of
their taxes in money, instead of giving a certain proportion of
the produce of the soil. All these towns enjoyed the civltas, or
riglits of Roman citizens; they consisted of the town and a
certain extent of land around it, and had a government of their
own, republican in form, resembling the ancient constitution of
Home, and exempt from all control of the imperial officers. As
soldiers, they were obliged only to defend their own town, and
were not liable to serve elsewhere. They possessed, in fact,
their own free constitution and officers, perhaps differing at
times from one another; but, speaking generally, the Roman
viuulclpiiim, or town corporation, consisted of the people at
large and the curia or governing body. The members of the
curia were called curiales, decuriories, or senators ; the rank was
hereditary, the son of a ciirialis becoming a mendjcr of the
curia by right of birth. Persons who were not of senatorial
birth might, however, be elected into that body. The curiales
received various emoluments, and possessed important privi-
leges ; they alone had the right of electing the magistrates and
officers of the viuuiciphim. These officers Avere, first, two
duumviri, or chief magistrates, who answered to the consuls at
Rome, and whose authority extended over the civitas, or terri-
tory surrounding and depending upon the town. Sometimes
the municipium had oidy one duumvir. The duummri were
chosen from among the curiales, no person not a member of the
senatorial body being capable of election to that office. They
were obliged to accept office, if elected ; a curialis refusing to
act as duumvir, or concealing himself to escape election, was
punished by confiscation of his property. After the duumviri,
a certain number of officers, termed principales, were elected
out of the body of the curia, who were the administrators of
the municipal affiiirs, and formed the permanent council of the
curia. The duumviri were in general elected yearly; i\iQ prin-
cii\p. XIII.] MUNICIPAL COXSTITUTIOXS. 427
clpales continued in office during- fifteen years. Besides these,
there were different inferior officers, equally elected by tlie curia.
The whole body of the citizens — the plebs — elected an important
officer, called the defensor clvltatls, who was not to be a member
of the curia, and whose duty it was to protect the populace
against the senatorial body, when the latter acted unjustly or
tyraniucally ; he was to the municipium what the tribune had
been in Rome. There were also corporations or colleges of the
different trades in the vmnicipia, who chose their patrons
among the senators or curialen.
At present we have unfortunately few inscriptions found in
Britain which illustrate the municipal constitution of the towns
under the Romans, probably because most of those which were
thus constituted are now covered with modern towns, and the
others have never been properly explored. The few which have
been found leave no doubt that the Roman laws in this respect
were firmly established here. We have already (p. 385) given /
an inscription commemorating a decurion of the colouia of
Glevum (Gloucester) , who died at Aquse Solis (Bath). Another
inscription (p. 381), mentions a sevir of the colonia of EI)nra-
cum (York). This word is generally understood as belonging-
to a military officer, but it must here refer to a municipal one.
Several instances occur in which the collegia are mentioned in
inscriptions in Britain. The collegium ligniferoriim mentioned
in inscriptions found at Castle Gary, in Scotland, has been
conjectured to be of a religious character. A collegium, fa.brorum,
is mentioned in a celebrated inscription of an early date found
at Chichester.* A still more celebrated inscription found near
Bath, mentions a collegium fabricensium, a guild of smiths, or,
as we should say now, smiths' company. This inscription relates
to a member of this college who belonged to the twentieth
legion, and is read as follows : —
ivLivs VITA Julius Vitalis,
LIS FABiiiciES smith of the
IS . LiiG . XX . V . V . tvventieth legion, the valiant
and victorious,
sTiPEXDiou who served, nine years,
VM IX AN NOR XX lived twenty-
IX. NATION K BH nine, by nation a Belgian,
LGA EX . cor.LRGio by the college
FABKICE . ELATV ot' the suiiths carried to burial,
s . H s E He is placed here.
* I have already given this inscription in a note to p. 51. It will be
2 D
V
428 THE ROMANS. Lciiap. xiii.
G niter has published an inscription, found on the site of the
ancient Nonientuni, in Italy, which commemorates an indi-
vidual who held the otfi.ce of cemltor (or censor) of the citizens
of Carauloduuum {Colchester) : —
CN . MUNATivs . M . F . PAL Cneius Munatius, Aurelius Bassus,
AVHELivs BASSVS SOU of Mavcus, ui the tribe
Palatina,
PR^F . COH . II pnefect of the second cohort
ASTVRVM . CENsiTou . civiVM of the Asturiaus, censitor of
the
UOMANOUVM . COLONIAE . VIC- Roman citizens of the colonla
TRiCENPis victrix*
CiUAE . FST . IN . BRITANNIA which is in Britannia
CAMOLODVNI .... at Camulodunum.
At first the rights of citizenship Avere o-iven as a mark of
honour and the reward of merit, chiefly to soldiers, for the
lloman municipalities in the provinces were all originally mili-
tary foundations ; but subsequently they Avere granted more
lavishly, and almost all the free population of the empire became
eventually Roman citizens. In earlier times the grants of
citizenship were duly registered at Rome, and copies of the
grant, inscribed on plates of copper or bronze, appear to
have been sent to the place where these new citizens
resided. Several such plates have been discovered in Britain,
as well as in other parts of the empire. One of these was
dug up in the parish of Malpas, in Ciieshire, in 1812; frag-
ments of two others were found in a gravel-pit on Sydenham
Common, in Kent, in 1806; and another was found at Stain-
ington, in Yorkshire, in 1761. They are all decrees of the
emperor Trajan, in favour of certain veterans serving in the
troops in Britain, and conferring upon them the clvltas, or
rights of citizenship, and the consequent coiinnbiiini, or civil
rights belonging to legitimate marriage. f The inscription
nnderstood that, in the inscription which follows, fabriciesis is merely
contracted or mis- written for fabriciensis.
* This epithet applied to the colonial town of Camulodunum, coincides
with the account of Tacitus that it was placed under the auspices of
Victory, whose temple served as a refuji^e to the inhabitants when attacked
by the insur<;ent Britons.
t The Romans termed a discharg-e from military service, mlssio ; and
these inscribed plates, as honourable discharges, are called by antiquarians
tabulfc ho)iest(e iiiissioiiis. Those found at Malpas and Sydenham were
published by Samuel Lysons ; the other is given in Gough's 'Camden,'
edition of I80G.
CHAP. xiiT.] TABULtE honesty MISSIONIS. 429
found at Malpas, as the most perfect, may be given as an
example of this important ckss of inscriptions : —
IMP . CAESAR . DIVI . NERV.^i:. F. NERVA . TRAIANVS
AVGVSTVS . GEKMANICVS . DACICVS . rONTU'EX . MAX
IMVS . TRIBVNIC . POTESTAT VII IMP IIII COS . V , PP.
EQVITIBVS . ET . PEDITIBVS . QVI MILITANT . IN ALIS
QVATVOR . ET . COHORTIPVS . DECEM . ET . VNA . QVAE . A
PELLANTVR . I . THRACVM . ET . I . PANNONIORVM . TAM
PIANA . ET . II . GALLORVM SEBOSIANA . ET . I . HISPA
NORVM YETTONVM , C . R . ET . I . HISPANORVM . ET . I
YALCIONVM , MILLIARIA . ET . I . ALPINORVM . ET . I
MORINORVM . ET , I . CVGERNORVM . ET . I . BAETASI
ORVM . ET . I . TVNGRORVM . MILLIARIA . ET . II . THRA
CVM . ET . Ill . BRACAR . AVGVSTANORVM . ET . IIII.
LINGONVM , ET . IIII . DELMATARYM , KT . SYNT
IN BRITANNIA SUB . I . NERATIO MARCELLO
QVI QVINA ET VICENA PLURAVE STIPENDIA
MERVERVNT . QVORVM . NOMINA . SVBSCRIPTA.
SVNT IPSIS LIBERIS POSTERISQVE EORVM . CIVITA
TEM DEBIT ET CONVBIVM . CVM . VXORIBVS . QVAS .
TVNC HABVISSENT . CVM . EST . CIVITAS . IIS . DATA .
AVT . SI . QVI , COELIBES . ESSENT . CVM IIS QVAS
POSTEA . DVXISSENT . DVMTAXAT . SINGVLI . SIN
GYLAS . AD XIII K FEBR
M . LABERIO MAXIMO II
Q GLITIO ATILIO AGRICOLA II CO
ALAE . I . PANNONIORVM . TAMPIANAE . CVI PRAEEST
C YALERIYS CELSYS . DECVRIONI
REBYRRO SEVERI . P . HISPAN
DESCRIPTYM . ET . RECOGNITVM . EX TABYLA . AENEA
QVAE . FIXA . EST . ROMAE . IN MYRO . POST . TEMPLYM
DIVI AYGYSTI AD MINERVAM .
Q . POMPEI HOMERI
C . PAPI EYSEBETIS
T . FLAVI SECYNDI
P . CAYLI VITALIS
C . YETTIENI MODESTI
P . ATINI HKDONICI
n. CLAVDI MENANDRI
The date of this record is fixed by its internal evidence to the
20th tlay of January a.d. 103. The other similar monuments
found in Britain are all of the same year. The example given
aljove may be translated thus : — The emperor Caesar, deified
Nerva's son, Nerva Trajanus Augustus, the German, the
Pacian, Pontifex Maximus, invested with the tribunitian power
the seventh time, emperor the fourth year, cousid the fifth time,
father of his country, to the cavaliy and infantry who serve
in the four alae and eleven cohorts, whicli are called the first
of the Thraciaus, and the first of Pannonians termed the Tam-
pian, and the second of Gauls termed the Sebosiaii, and the
430 THE ROMANS. [chap. xiii.
first of Spanish Yettoiies, Roman citizens, and the first of
Spaniards, and the first of Valciones, a milliary one, and tlie
Hrst of Alpini, and the first of Morini, and the first of Cng-erni,
and the first of Bsetasii, and the first of Tung-rinns, a niilliarv
one, and tlie second of Tliracians, and the third of Braccse
Aug-ustani, and the fourth of Lingones, and the fourth of
Dahnatians, and they are in Britain nnder Julius Neratius
IMarcellus, who have sers'ed twenty-five or more years, whose
names are written below, to themselves, their children, and
posterity, has given civitas and connublum (the rights of
citizensliip and marriage) with their wives, whom tliey miglit
then have when citizenship was given to them, or if any of
them were unmarried, with those wdiom they might afterwards
take, that is to say, provided they have only one each. On
the 13th kalends of February. To M. Laberius Maximns twice,
and Q. Glitius Atilius Agricola tAvice consuls. To Reburrus,
son of Severus, the Spaniard, decurion of the first ala of
the Pannonians, termed the Tampian, wliich is commanded by
C. Valerius Celsus. Copied and revised from the tablet of
brass which is fixed at Rome on the wall beliind the temple of
divine Augustus near that of Minerva. Quintus Pompeius
Homerus, Caius Papius Eusebes, Titus Flavius Secundus,
Pul)lius Caulus Vitalis, Caius Yettienus Modestus, Publius
Atinius Hedonicus, and Titus Claudius Menander.
We have no traces of a Roman mint in Britain until the
reign of Dioclesian and Maximian, on the exergue or vacant
space on the reverse of some of whose coins we find the letters
LON and ML, which numismatists seem agreed in interpreting
Loudinium, and moneta Londlneitsis, and in considering as an
indication of the place at which they were minted. It is,
however, far from certain that Roman money was not coined
in the island before it was thought necessary to indicate the
circumstance by such letters, and we cannot but be astonished
at the extraordinary activity of the Roman mint in Britain
during the usurpation of Carausius and Allectus. The great
mass of their coins appear to have been struck in Britain.
Those of Carausius bear in the exergues various combinations
of letters, which, there can be little doubt, refer to different
Roman towns in this island where they were minted. One of
the more common forms is ml, which is interpreted moneta
I Londiiiensis, money of Londinium {Loudon). In other examples
there is simply an l for Londiniinn. Another common form is
R s, which is believect to signify Jiidnplis signata (jnoneia),
CHAr. XIII.] ROMAN MINT-MARKS. 431
money coined at Rutnpiae {Rlchhorough) . The most common
form of all is iiSR, which is also supposed to mean mouev
struck at Richboroug-h, though the meaning* of the second u
has not been satisfactorily explained. The letters mrs, found
on some coins of Carausius, may also signify moneta Rutup'ux
slfjn.ata. Two difi'erent types of the same usurper have on the
exergue the letters rsp, which are perhaps the initials of
Riditplls slgnata pecimla. The letter c is found singly on a
considerable number of different types of the coinage of Carau-
sius, and is believed to refer to Clausentum (^Bittern) ^ one of
the great naval stations on the southern coast of Britain ; and
other similar inscriptions, such as MC, sc, msc, spc, are believed
to refer to the same place, and to admit of the interpretations
moneta Clausenti, slgnata Clausentl^ vioueta slgnata Cluasentl,
and slgnata pecnnla Clausantl. The letters iiSA, found in the
exergue of at least one type, may refer to Rutupite. Other
types exhibit the letters MS, or msp, or simply M, which may
possibly refer to Magna {Ken Chester), where a remarkabh^
quantity of the money of Carausius is constantly found. The
letters may be thus interpreted, Magnls slgnata, Magrils slgnata
pecunla, or giving* merely the name of the place, Magnls.
Many examples have numerals added to the name of the place,
but their meaning is very doubtful. Thus we have many types
of coins of Carausius bearing on the exergue the letters mlxxi,
which seems to stand for moneta Londlnll xxl ; a combination
of letters equally common is cxxx, which may stand for Clau-
senti xxl ; and we have some wdiich are marked simply with the
numerals xxi. We have on other examples mlx {^nwneta Lon-
dlnll »r), and x by itself; LVii {Londlnll vll) ; and the numerals
XX and xxxx, without any indication of the name of the place.
On the coinage of Allectus we find in the exergues the letters
ML (^moneta Londlnensls) , which is the most common ; MSL
{moneta slgnata Londlnll) ; c. {Clausenti), which is also \('vy
common; M {Magnls?) CL, QL, and Q,c, which have not been
explained. A few of the coins of Constantine the Great have
in the exergue p lon {pecnnla Londlnensls), but they are far
more common w^ith the continental mint-marks. The inscrip-
tion p LON IS also found on the coins of Constantine's empress
Fausta, of his sons Crispus and Constantine, and of his daugh-
ter-in-law (as it is supposed) Helena; but after the time of
Allectus there are no indications of other towns in Britain in
which money was minted; and even the simple p lon dis-
appears after thj reigns of the sons of Constantine, There may,
4 32 THE ROMANS. [chap. xiii.
Iiou'ever, have still remained a local mint, wliicli, as fiir as is vet
known, has left no distingnishing- mark on its coinnge.*
It is to be remarked that the insular coins of Caransiiis are
not in general inferior in purity of metal and in execution to the
contemporary coinage of the continent. But it is no less true
that among the Roman money found in this coimtry we find a
great mass of debased or adulterated coinage, and, which is
still more curious, that very extensive manufactures of spurious
money have been traced. A few years ago, during the excava-
tions for laying the foundations of King William-street, in the
city of London, a considerable quantity of coins made of iron
})lated with silver, intended to pass as silver, were found packed
up in tiers, as they had been imported into Britain, probably
to pay the troops. The latest of them were of the emperor
Claudius, which was perhaps the time when they were brought
over hither. Most of these coins are in the cabinet of Mr
Koach Smith, who also possesses a number of Roman forged
coins cast in lead, found chiefly in the Thames. Amongst the
numerous coins found at Mary port, in Cumberland, were a great
([uantity of forged denarii , of Trajan and Hadrian, mostly,
like those in Mr Smith's museum, cast in lead. It has been
remarked that ' genuine coin must have been exceedingly
scarce among the soldiers of this camp, and their credulity very
great, to allow of the circulation of such base imitations.'
Extensive remains of the manufactures of spurious money
under the Romans have been found in several places in this
island, but more especially at Lingwell Gate, near Wakefield,
in Yorkshire ; at Edington, in Somersetshire ; at Ruyton and
Wroxeter, in Shropshire ; and at Castor, in Northamptonshire.
The last three places Avere the sites of well-known Roman towns,
Rutunium, Uriconium, and Durobrivse. The manner of casting
the coins was a very simple process. A fine clay, found on the
locality, was formed into small round tablets, of uniform size and
thickness. A coin of one of the emperors was pressed between
each two tablets, so as to leave a perfect impression, and the
latter were then arranged upon one another in files or columns,
the upper and lower tablets being impressed only on one side.
A notch was broken into the side all the way down, which
admitted the metal into each impression. Two, or three, of
these columns, as the case might be, were placed side by side,
* It must be remarked that many of the foregoing explanations are
conjectural, and they may perhaps admit of other interpretations. Tlie
c, for instance, may stand for Camulodunum, instead of Clausentuin.
CHAP. XIII.] MANUFACTURE OF FOUGED MONEY
433
witli the side notches joined tog-ether, and tliese were enclosed
in a clay case, with a hole at the top, tiirouoh which tlie
melted metal ran down the opening- left by the notches, by
whicli it entered into all the impressions. Tlie arrangement,
as observed in the monlds found at Lingwell Gate, is exhibited
in our woodcut, where the upper
tigure represents the faces of three
impressed tablets as they were
joined together in the columns.
It Avas only necessary that care
should be taken to place the tablets
on one another so that the re-
verse might correspond with the
head belonging to it. Their mis-
placement would produce those
wrong reverses which are some-
times found among ancient Roman
coins, and which have often puzzled
the numismatist.
From the number of these
moulds, which are found on the
sites where they occur, we might
imagine that after being used two
or three times, they were thrown
aside as waste, and new ones
formed. In an account of those
found at Edington, in Somerset-
shire, printed in the fourteenth
volume of the ' Archseologia.'
the writer informs us that ' the field in which they were
found is a meadow that bears no marks of ever having
been ploughed ; which accounts for the moulds remaining so
long undiscovered. It is situated at the north eih^e of Polden
liill, at about a quarter of a mile to the north of the village
of Chilton. We were led to this particular spot by a person who
had, some time before, cut through a bed of them in digging
a drain. They were lying promiscuously scattered over a space
about four feet square, and from six inches to a foot below the
snrface of the ground.' He adds that in the space of an
hour they picked uj) several hundred moulds. They are found
also scattered about very plentifully at Lingwell. In somt;
instances pieces of metal have been found, and at Lingwell
Gate an earthen crucible for melting it was met with. Some
Moulds for Coinins;.
434 THE ROMANS. [chap. xiii.
moulds have even been found to contain tlie forg-ed coins as
the metal had been poured in, which had never been taken
out.
Moulds of the same kind have been found in France, espe-
cially in Lyons, and at Damery, near Epernay, in the depart-
ment of the Marne. This latter place occupied the site of a
lloman station. Excavations made there in the whiter of 1829,
brought to light, under a heap of burnt matter, the remains of
extensive buildings which had evidently been destroyed by
tire, and appeared to have consisted of baths and a money er's
workshop. In some of the apartments were found vases full
of coins. The tirst contained at least two thousand pieces of
base silver, more than fifteen hundred of which bore the head
of Postunuis ; the remainder presenting the series Avhich is
generally found from the elder Philip down to that reign.
The fjibric was bad, and the metal much alloyed. Another
vase contained a silver coin of Antoninus ; five small brass of
the money of Treves, with the types of Home and Constanti-
nople ; a hundred other small brags of the money of Treves,
Lyons, Aries, Aquileia, and other towns, with the heads of
Constans and Constantius, sons of Constantine ; and neai'ly
ibur thousand pieces in small brass of the fourth size, all of the
same emperors, Constans and Constantius. All these coins
were so fresh, that it seemed evident they had been made
in the place where they Mere found, and that they had never
been in circulation. This circumstance was soon explained by
the discovery in an adjoining room of a manufactory of money,
which, at the time the buildings were destroyed, must have
been in full activity. ' There, under a heap of ashes and
tiles, Avere found together, shears and the remains of other
instruments suitable for the making of money ; and several
collections of moulds of baked earth, still containing the
pieces wdiich had been cast in them, and the ingot formed by
the superlluoiis metal. These moulds were moulded from the
money Avhich they were intended to reproduce, by pressing the
models between discs of worked clay of larger diameter, in
order to form ledges, and were then placed one upon another,
so that, with the exception of the first and last, they received
on the two faces the stamp of the obverse and the reverse of a
piece. The cavities and the impressions being obtained by this
process, both easily and accurately, the discs composing the
moulds were notched, in order to form a passage for the fused
metal; Ihey were then hardened in the fire, and replaced on
CHAP. XIII.] COIXS RELATING TO BRITAIN. 43.)
one another, notch over notch, in tlie same order as when
moulded.'
It lias been a question rather learnedly and warmly discussed,
whether these workshops were those of private forgers, or
whether they were establishments under the direction of the
imperial g-overnment. The latter supposition seems to be au-
thorized by the fact that they are found in large towns, and ap-
parently, in some instances, in public buildings. The moulds
found at Polden Hill, in Somersetshire, were of Severus and
his wife Julia, of Caracalla, Geta, Macrinus, Elagabalus, Alex-
ander Severus, Maximinus, Maximus, Plautilla, Julia Paula,
and Julia Mammaea, These, compared with other circum-
stances, seem to show that the forgeries were caiTied on after
the reign of Severus, and that it w^as probably one scheme of
the fiscal administration to raise money by the issue of debased
coin, which, to protect the reigning emperor from odium, was
cast from moulds of the coins of previous emperors. Of
course, it does not follow necsssarily that some of the moulds
which have been found in other places may not have belonged
to private forgers, who thus enriched themselves by defrauding
the public.
Mr Akerman has published a useful volume under the title
of ' Coins of the Eomans relating to Britain.' The series of
Eoman coins which come under this denomination have a
peculiar interest connected with the history of our island.
From the moment wdien Claudius set his foot on our shores,
there was a regular series of imperial coins conniiemorative of
victories in l^ritain by the emperors or by their military com-
manders. Those of Claudius, bearing on the reverse a
triumphal arch wqth the inscription de brittan (over tin;
l^ritons), are well known. The expedition of the emperor
Hadrian was commemorated by a coin in large brass, struck in
the year 121, on the reverse of which is the inscription,
ADVENTVS AVG BllITANNIAE (the advcut of tllC AugUStuS to
Britain). The same emperor commemorated his exploits by
another coin, bearing on the reverse a figure of a female seated
OH a rock, holding a spear on her arm, with a shield resting by
her side, and the inscription Britannia. There are several
different coins of Hadrian with this device, from which they
ara usually knoAvn as the Britannia types, and similar coins
w^ere struck under Antoninus Pius ; but in the latter the figure
is more frequently a male than a female. Tt is from these;
lionian coins that the fi<>-ure of Britannia was taken for our
436 THE llOMAXS. [chap. xiii.
modem English niintap,-e. Coins of Severus bear tlie inscrip-
tion victoriak BiiiTANNiCAE, to commeuiorate the expeditious
of that emperor against the Caledonians. Similar inscriptions
appear on those of his sons, Caracalla and Geta. The mintage
of the usurpers Carausius and Allectus furnish the most
important monuments of tlie history of Britain during that
period ; Avhile those of their successors are chiefly connected
with our island by the marks of the London mint.
The great quantities of Roman coins which are found in this
island, and "which have been continually found for many ages,
prove that there was no want of money in Roman Britain.
They are usually found hoarded up in earthen vessels, each
containing sometimes several thousand pieces. These had, no
doubt, been concealed by the original proprietoi's, wlio were, by
some accident or other, prevented from taking them from their
hiding-places. The great number of pots of Roman money
found in almost every part of Britain, show that this was the
ordinary maimer of storing up monc}' which was not in circula-
tion. It was no doubt buried in the ground within the limits
of the residence of its proprietor, or in some spot where it was
not likely to be intruded upon. Large urns of this kind are
sometimes turned up by the ploughshare, and thus made to
display their contents to the wondering eyes of the modern
Imsbandman. Roman urns filled with coins have been found,
in some instances — chiefly in the mining districts — concealed
in crevices of rocks. The receptacle of the treasure was not
always, hoAvever, an earthenware vessel. Li the year 1837, a
quantity of gold and silver coins of Roman emperors, from
Nero to Hadrian, was found in a bronze vessel, formed like a
shallow basket, and covered with a lid, concealed in the crevice
of a rock at Thorngrafton, near Hexham, in Northumberland.
Several instances have also occurred, where the coins had been
placed in receptacles of a much more singular description. At
Cirencester, in the time of Leland (under Henry YIIL), a
quantity of Roman silver coin was found concealed in the shank
bone of a horse, which was closed at the end with a peg ;* and
ten British gold coins were found by a boy tending sheep, a
few years ago, near High Wycombe, in Buckinghamshire, in a
hollow flint. A still more remarkable circumstance is the
manner in wdiich coins are spread over almost all Roman sites.
* ' By the town nostrls temporibiis was found a broken sliank bone of
a horse, the mouth closed with a pegoe, the which was taken owt, a shep-
ard t'ounde yt tillid nummis argenteis.' — Leland' s Itl//., vol. v. p. 61.
ciiAV. XIII.] PRorORTIOXAL NUMBKES OF ROMAN COINS. 437
In excavating a town, or a villa, we iind tliem scattered in the
houses and courts, about the streets, and over the fields around.
In the partial excavations at Lyrane, where few of the usual
articles of Roman antiquity were found, coins occurred every-
where. In the ploughed land on the hill round the walls of
Kichborough, one cannot walk long without picking up a
Roman coin ; and on many other long-deserted sites there is
scarcely a cottager in the neighbourhood who has not a collec-
tion of coins, which he has picked up in liis garden, or when at
work in the adjoining fields. Any one would imagine that the
Romans in Britain amused themselves with throwing their
money away ; and I am not aware that any probable explana-
tion of this circumstance has yet been given.* The coins
found thus scattered about are generally, as might be expected,
in much worse condition than those which are found in hoards.
The mass of the Roman coins found in Britain are of very
common types, and of small intrinsic value ; but a few rarer
specimens are generally found even in small hoards, and now
and then an unique or nearly unique example occurs. This is
more frequently the case with the coins of Carausius. Coins
are founcl of all periods, from the consular sei'ies to the time
when the Roman legions abandoned the island, and in collec-
tions of any extent, in whatever part of the island they are
made, the proportional quantities of the coins of the different
emperors are generally much the same. There are some local
exceptions to this rule, more especially with regard to the coin-
age of Carausius and Allectus, which are found to predominate
in one or two places, which were no doubt chief stations of
their troops. More than eleven hundred Roman coins found
of late years at Richborough, and described by Mr Roach
Smith, presented the following proportional numbers for each
emperor or empress : —
British . = . . .
Consular
Augustus (B.C. 27 — A.D. 14) .
Agrippa (b.c. 9— a.d. 30) . .
Tiberius (a.d. 14—37)
Antonia (wife of Drusus senior)
Caligula (a.d. 37 — 41) . .
1
3
7
1
2
1
2
ir
Brought forward . .17
Claudius (a.d. 41 — 54) . . 15
Nero (a.d. 50—68) . . .11
Vespasian (a.d. 69 — 79) . . 13
Titus (a.d. 69—81) ... 1
Doinitian (a.d. 69—96) . . 10
Nerva (a.d. 96—98) . . 1
68
* Great quantities of Rtmian coins have been brought up from the bed
of the river Thames at London, by dredgers.
438
THE ROMANS.
[chap. xr.i.
68
7
o
1
9
3
4
-5
2
) 1
Brought forward
Trajan (a.d. 98—117) . - •
Hadrian (a.d. 117—138) .
Sabina (wife of Hadrian)
.Elius Caesar (a.d. 136—138) .
Antoninus Pius (a.d. 138 — 161)
Faustina the Elder (wife of
Antoninus) ....
Marc. Aurelius (a.d. 161 — 180)
Faustina the Younger (wife of
M. Aurelius) . . . .
Lucius Verus (a.d. 161—169)
Lucilla (wife of Lucius Verus
Con)modus (a.d. 166 — 192)
Severus (a.d. 197—211) . . 5
Julia Domna (wife of Severus) 3
Caracalla (a.d. 196-217) . . 3
Julia Ma3sa (sister of Julia
Domna) .... 1
Severus Alexander (a.d. 221 —
235) 7
Gordianus (a.d. 238—244) . 6
Philippus (a.d. 244—249) . . 4
Valerianus (a.d. 254—260) . 3
Valerianus junior . . . 1
Gallienus (a.d. 253-268) . . 19
Salonina (wife of Gallienus) . 4
Postunms (a.d. 260—267) . 10
Victorinus (a.d. 265 — 267) . . 1-1
Marius (a.d. 267) ... 1
Tetricus (a.d. 267—272) . . 13
Claudius Gothicus (a.d. 268
—270) 15
Quintillus (a.d. 270) . . . 2
Aurelianus (a.d. ?'^0 — 275) . 4
Tacitus (a.d. 275) ... 5
Florianus (a.d. 276) . . . 1
Probus (A.D. 276—282) . . 7
Carinus (a.d. 282—285) . . 1
Numerianus (a.d. 282—284) . 2
Uiocletianus (a.d. 284—313) . 8
244
Brought forward . . 244
Maximianus (a.d. 286—310) . 16
Carausius (a.d. 287—293) . . 94
Allectus (a.d. 293—296) . .45
Constantius I. (a.d. 293—306) 4
Helena (wife of Constantius) . <S
Theodora (second wife of Con-
stantius) . . . .13
Galerius Maximianus (a.d. 292
—311) 1
Maxentius (a.d. 306—312) . 2
Romulus (son of Maxentius) . 1
Licinius (a.d. 307—324) . .12
Licinius junior . . . . 1
Consrantine the Great (a.d. 306
—337) 149
Fausta (wife of Constantine) . 2
Crispus (a.d. 317—326) . .18
Delmatius (nephew of Constan-
tino) 1
Constantine II. (a.d. 317—340) 9S
Constans (a.d. 333—350) . . 77
Constantius II. (a.d. 323—361) 42
Urbs Roma . . . .52
Constantinopolis . . . . 60
Magnentius (a.d. 350—353) . 21
Decentius (a.d. 351 — 353) . 4
Julianus II. (a.d. 355—363) . 7
Helena (wife of Julian) . . 1
Jovianus (a.d. 363—364) . . 1
Valentinianus (a.d. 364—375) 22
Valens (a.d. 364-378) . . 39
Gratianus (a.d. 375—383' . .. 40
Theodosius (a.d. 379—395) . 14
Mv.gnus Maximus (a.d. 383 —
388) . . _. . .6
Victor (son of Miiximus) . . 3
Eugenius (a.d. 392—395) . 1
Arcadius (a d. 383—408) . . 27
Honorius (a.d. 393—423) . 8
Constantine III. (a.d. 407) . 1
Total . . 1144
Of these Eicliboroup,'li coins, seven (including tlie British coin)
;u"e of gold, fifty-six of silver, fifteen of billon or debased
silver, and the rest of brass. Tiie coins of billon, like most of
the debased silver, belong to tiie immediate successors of
Severus. Silver coins are often found in much larger propor-
tions to the others ; and the gold coins are too often carried
away separately, on account of their value, and they have thus
frequently found their way direct to the melting-pot. Among
two hundred and sixty-eight Roman coins foimd at Caerleon,
and described in Mr Lee's work on that ancient citv, there
CHAP. XIII.] PROrORTIOXAL NUMBERS OF ROMAN COINS. 439
were two of gold, forty-four of silver, eleven plated, and three of
billon or debased metal. These coins belonged to the different
emperors in the following proportions : —
Claudius ....
1
Nero
1
Vespasian
Titus .....
i;j
1
Domitiau ....
o
Nerva .....
2
Trajan ....
12
Hadrian ....
9
Antoninus Pius
11
Faustina, flu; older
3
Marcus xlurelius
8
Faustina, the younscr
1
Lucius Verus .
1
Lucilla ....
2
Mamiiiaea
1
Julia Soaiinias
2
Com mod us
3
Se verus ....
11
Julia ....
2
Caracalla ....
7
Geta ....
3
Julia MaBsa
I
Macrinus ....
1
Severus Alexander
1
Elag-abalus (Heliogabalus)
1
Gordianus
3
Philippus ....
Valerianus
2
1
Brought forward
Gallienus
Salonina .
Postumus .
Victorinus
The Tetrici .
Claudius Gothicus .
Probus
Maximianus
Carausius .
Allectus .
Constantius
Helena
Galerius Maximianus
Licinius .
Constantine the Great
Fausta
Crispus
Constantine II.
Constans
Constantius II.
Urbs Roma .
Constantinopolis
Magnentius
Decentius
Valens
Gratianus
Ai'cadius
104
1
2
2
. 4
7
7
2
5
21
4
1
1
2
4
2.S
1
4
o
13
6
13
o
12
1
7
2
1
:u
lotal
2G8
44C THE R()x\rA-XS. [cuat. xiv.
CHAPTER XIY.
Declining State of the Roman Empire after the age of Juh'an — Theodosius
sent to Britain — Revolt and Career of Maximus — Stilicho — Mai'cu?
and Gratian revolt in Britain — The Usui'per Constantine — Honorius—
Britain independent of the Empii'e and harasvsed by the Northern Bar-
barians— The Britons receive assistance from Rome — The last Roman
Legion withdrawn — The Angles and Saxons come in — The Angles
settle in Northunibria — The Jutes in Kent — Hengest and Hoi'sa —
^Ua in Sussex — Cerdic arrives in Hampshire— Essex and the Angles
— Mission of St Augustine and Conversion of the Anglo-Saxons to
Christianity.
At the period when we have to resume our sketch of tlie his-
tory of Britain, the vast empire of the Csesars, harassed on all
sides by its outward enemies, was approaching fast towards a
dissolution. It had required all the courage and vigilance ot
Julian to keep the Teutons at bay on the northern frontier, and
the Saxons were becoming every day more Ibrmidable in the
western seas. Tlie governor or vicar of Britain, at the time
when Julian ascended the imperial throne, was an ofticer named
Aly])ius, who was recalled by the emperor, in order to be
entrusted with the charge of directino- the rebuildiu"- of the
walls of Jerusalem, which Julian had determined to restore
in a feeling of hostility to the Christians. We know notliiug
of the state of Britain during Julian's reign, but soon after the
accession of Jovian it was fearfully harassed by the joint
attacks of the Picts, Scots, and Attacots from the north, and
of the Saxons from the sea. They seem to have met with
little resistance until the reign of his successor Valentinian,
who, giving up the empire of the east to his brother Valens,
employed his own energy in restoring security and order to the
west. It was in the year 368, as Valentinian was on his way
from Amiens to Treves, that he received intelligence from
Britain of a new and terrible irruption of the barbarians, who
J
CHAP. XIV.] TROUBI-ES IN BPJTAIN. 441
had defeated and slain the count of the maritime district (the
Saxon coast), Nectarides, while the duke FuUofaudes (no douljl
the same officer called in tlie Notitia duke of Britain), had
fallen into an ambush. In his first moment of indignation, the
emperor despatched Severus, the count of the domestics, or
steward of the household, to take the command in the island ;
but, on reflection, he recalled this appointment, and substituted a
in his place Jovinus, who instantly sent Provertuides to Britain V
to assemble the troops, that they might be ready on his arrival.
Purther consideration seems to have opened A^dentinian's eyes
still more to the gravity of the crisis, and the appointment was
changed again, the conunand of Britain being finally entrusted
to one of the ablest of the imperial generals, the celebrated
Theodosius.
Theodosius hastened to Boulogne, which was at this time
called Bononia, and he soon landed at Rntupise with a strong
force, composed of the Batavii, the Eruli, the Jovii, and the
A^ictores. We are told by the historian Ammianus Marcellinus, sj^^
the brief narrator of these events, that the Picts, who at this
time were divided into two great tribes (the Dicalidones and the
Yecturioiies), had joined Avith the Scots and the fierce nation of
the Attacotti, in this invasion, and we can understand its grave
character, when we are assured that at the time of the landing
of Theodosius at Rutupiae, the enemies were plundering the
country round London, tiie name of which had then been
changed to Augusta. The Roman commander immediately
marched against them, and sub-dividing his forces, defeated
their numerous predatory bands with great slaughter, and
deprived them of their booty, a great part of which was re-
stored to those from whom it had been taken. The citizens of
London joyfully opened their gates to their deliverer, and he
remained there a short time to give repose to his troops, and to
consider the difficulties with which he had to contend. He
soon learnt from deserters and captives the character of the
enemy with which he had to deal, and he came to the con-
clusion that they might be conquered by policy as much as by
arms. He issued a proclamation offering a pardon to all who
would desert from their ranks, and ' on this promise a great
number returned to their duty.' It is evident iVoni this, that
there was an insurrection of the subject population combined >^
with the invasion. Theodosins next sent a report on the
state of Britain to the emperor, and reconunended that an
officer named Civilis, distinguish(;d for his energy and honesty,
^t2 THE ROMANS. [chap. yiv.
should be sent to liim as o-overnor of Britain, accompanied by
a distinguished military commander, the duke Dulcitius.*
After remaining- some time at London, to wait the effect of
his proclamation, and the arrival of Civilis and Dulcitius with
reinforcements, Theodosius left that city at the head of a brave
and well-appointed army, and, by his rapid and great snccess,
soon jnstitied the high military character for which he was
previously known. ' He ahvays anticipated the enemy in
occupying the most important positions, and gave no orders to
the common soldiers which he was not himself the first to
execute. In this way, discharging the duties both of an able
general and brave soldier, he routed the various tribes whose
insolence, prompted by security, had led them to attack the
Roman province, and he re-established the cities and fortresses,
Avhich had suffered severely by their manifold losses, but which
in their foundation had been calculated for preserving the island
in permanent tranquillity. 'f Among the auxiliary troops sent
into Britain by the emperor Valentinian, and probably at this
time, was a body of Germans {iinmerm AUemaunoruni), with a
king or chief (j'ex), named Fraomarius, who received the title
and office of tribune.
The ffrst successes of a commander like Theodosius were
sufffcient to discourage the opponents with whom he had to
deal ; and he not only cleared the southern districts of their
invaders, but he recovered from the Picts and Scots the country
between the walls of Hadrian and Antoninus, which he found
in the undisturbed posses'sioii of the enemy, and to which he
now gave the name of Yalentia, in honour of the emperoi'.
He repaired and strengthened the forts and garrisons which
protected the northern frontier, and the island appears to have
been restored to a degree of peace and prosperity which it had
not enjoyed for many years. For tliis Britain was probably
indebted in some degree to the indulgence of Valentinian,
whose constant study it is said to have been to ease the pro-
vinces by relieving them of taxes and protecting their frontiers.
* Denique edictis propositis impunitateque promissa, desertores ad pro-
cinctuni vocabat, et multos alios per diversa libero commeatu disperses.
Quo inonitu utrediere plerique, incentivo peroitus, retentusque anxiis curis,
Civileni nomine recturum Britannias pi'o prtefectis ad se poposcerat mitti,
virum acrioris ingenii, sed justi tenacem et recti ; itidenique Dulcitiuni
ducem scientia rei niilitaris insignem, — Ammianus Marcel.^ lib. xxvii.
0. 9.
t In intearum restituit oivitates et castra, niultiplicibus quidem damnis
affli(!ta, sed ad quietem teniporis longi fundata. — Ammimnis Marcel.^ lib.
xxviii. c. 3.
CHAP. XIV.] THE ARCAXT. 443
Indeed, ^vllen we consider the brief and imperfect acconnt of
these events f;-iven by the ohl historian, we become convinced
that there was somethinp; more than a mere invasion of barba-
rians, and tliat these had been joined, if not called in, bv a
large portion of the population of the Eoman province. AVe
have seen many instances of the readiness with which the cities
in Britain rose up in rebellion against the imperial authority, y
and it is not improbable that they looked upon the change
which had turned their governor into a mere vicar under the;
government of Gaul as a serious diminution of their independ-
ence. Pei'haps, under the new regime, their taxes and services
had become more burthensome. It is certain, however, that ,^
Ammianus Marcellinus, in resuming briefly the character of the
emperor Valentinian, blames him for an habitual inattention to
the complaints of his subjects in the distant provinces, and
accidentally informs us that it was this circumstance which had
caused the tumults in Britain.* The people of Britain had*
therefore asked for a redress of grievances, and the emperor had
turned a deaf ear to their complaints. Another incident men-
lioned by the historian shows us that there was intelligence be-
tween the insurgents and the invaders. There was, we are told,
in the province a class of men employed who were entitled,
according to the text of Ammianus as now printed, Areani, but
Avhich is supposed to be an error for Areani, secret agents ; for
he informs us that their duty was to travel as spies among
the different peoples on the frontiers of the empire, and bring
early intelligence of their movements and designs. These men,
we are told, in Britain, had entered into comnuuiication Avith
the enemies, and had given them information which enabled them
to make their invasions with the greater security and advantage.
The Areani had become so dangerous, tliat Theodosius found it
necessary to deprive them of the power of doing further evil,
and, as far as avc can gather, the otiice itself appears to have
been abolished. f
* In hoc tantum deerrans, quod, quuni gregarioruni etiam levia puniret
orrata, potiorum diicuni flag-itia progredi sinebat in majus, ad querelas in
COS motas aliquoties obsurdescens ; undo Britannici strepitus et At'rican;e
clades et vastitas ernersit lUyrici. — Ammianus Marcel.^ lib. xxx. c. 9.
t Aniniianus had given a further account of these Areani, or Areani, in
a part of his book which is now lost. The manuscript which preserved his
history throuj^h the destructive period which followed the fall of the
empire had been much mutilated ; and it happens unfortunately that, as
ill the case of Tacitus, the very books which would have o-iven us imnoi-t-
ant informafiou uu the history and condition of Britain were those whirh
have perished.
2 E
4U THE ROMANS. [chap. xiv.
Another occurrence related by the same liistorian gives us a
passing- glance of the divisions and intrigues which at this time
reigned in the province of Britain. There was in Britain at
this time a man named Valentinus, a native of A^aleria, in
Pannonia, notorious for his intrigues and ambition, who had
been sent as an exile to Britain in expiation of some heavy
crime. This practice of banishing political offenders to Britain
appears to have been, at the time of which we are now speak-
ing, very prevalent ; for we learn from the same annalist that a
citizen of Home, named Frontinus, was at tiie time of the
revolt just described sent into exile in Britain for a similar
cause. Men like these no sooner arrived in the island than
they took an active part in its divisions, and brought the talent
for political intrigue which had been fostered in Italy to act
upon the agitation already existhig iu the distant province.
Such was the case with A^alentinus, who, as the brotlier-in-law
of one of the deepest agitators of Eome, the vicar Maximinus
(described by Ammianus as ille exltialis vlcarlus), had no doubt
been well trained for the part he was now acting. As far as
we can gather from the brief notices of the histoidan, this
individual seems, when Theodosius arrived in Britain, to have;
heen actively engaged in some ambitious designs, which the
ari'ival of tliat great and \ipright commander rendered hopeless.
Theodosius had not been long in Londinium, when he received
private information that Valentinus was engaged with the other
exiles in a formidable conspiracy, and that even many of the
military had been secretly corrupted by his promises.* With
the vigour which characterised all his actions, Theodosius
<'aused the arch-conspirator and his principal accomplices to be
seized suddenly, at the moment when their designs were on the
point of being carried into execution, and they were delivered
over to duke Dulcitius, to receive the punishment due to their
crimes ; but, aware of the extensive ramifications of the plot
in which they had been engaged, and believing that it had been
sufficiently crushed, Theodosius wisely put a stop to all further
inquiries, fearing lest by prosecuting them he might excite an
alarm, which would only bring a renewal of the scenes of tur-
bulence and outrage which his presence had already in a great
* Quiet is impatiens niiilefica bestia ad res perniciosas consuroebat et
novas, in Theodosiuiu tuiuoie quodam, quein solum resistere posse nefandis
<-ogitationibus advertebat. Multa tamen clam palamque circumspiciens,
♦■rescente flatu cupiditatis immensae exsules solicitabat et milites, pro tem-
fforis captn ausorum illecebrosas pollicendo mercedos.
CHAP. XIV.] REVOLT OF MAXLAIUS. 44.5
measure appeased.* The lorudence as well as the valour of \
Theodosius Avere thus united in restorino- Britain to peace and \
tranquillity; and we are assured that when, in 359, he quitted 1
the island, he was accompanied to the port where he embarked /
by crowds of «;rateful provincials.
The spirit of discontent and rebellion, which appears to have
been so widely spread amon^ the inhabitants of tlie island
])rovince, was only suppressed by Theodosius to break out a
i'ew years afterwards in a more alarming form. The emperor
Valentinian died in the November of the year 375, and left
the empire to his two sons, Gratian, who had already partaken
in its cares, and Valentinian, a mere child. Theodosius had
already fallen a victim to the jealousies of the court, but he
had left a son, also named Theodosius, to inherit his greatness.
The empire of the east having been made vacant by the death
of Valens, Gratian chose the young Theodosius as his successor,
in 379 ; he had already divided the empire of the west, by
placing Italy and the countries bordering on the Mediterranean
under his younger brother, while he retained for himself the
more difhcult task of governing Gaul, Spain, and Britain. The
elevation of Theodosius to the imperial dignity was the signal
for a general revolt in the latter province. There was at this
time in Britain a young ofiicer, a native of Spain, named
Magnus Maximus, who had served in the island along with
young Theodosius, and who was now a great favourite with the
troops, although Ave are not informed what command he held.
Tt is said that his jealous mind was profoundly wounded at
the honours showered upon Theodosius, and that he Avas easily
induced to join in a conspiracy for Avresting the Avesteru
division of the empire from Gratian. In the year 383, the
soldiers in Britain, who are characterised by the almost contem-
porary historian as the most arrogant and turbulent of all the
imperial troops,f rose, it appears, unanimously, and proclaimed
Maximus their emperor. Maximus at once placed himself ,
at the head of the British army, and, passing over to the con- .
tinent, landed at the mouth of the Ehine. The troops in J
Germany immediately revolted to his standard, and the new I
emperor marched .triumphantly into Treves, which he made/
his capital
* De conjuratis qusesfiones agitari prohibuit, ne fonnidine sparsa per
innlfos revivisoerent provinciarutn turbines ccMiipositi.
T Oirt T<i)v uWoDu aiTuvrtaif irXtov audnofia Kai Oujulu) vtKvoiJiii'ov^.^
Zoniiniis, lib. iv. c. '6o.
446
THE ROMANS.
[chap. XIV
Of the events which followed, the accounts of different
writers are very contradictory ; but, according- to that which
appears to be entitled to most credit, Gratiiin was residing' at
Paris, without any suspicion of the danger which threatened
him, when he received intelligence of this dangerous revolt.
Perceiving that he was deserted by the troops in Gaul, Avhose
hostility he liad provoked, and having ascertained that it was
in vain to attempt to resist the usurper, he tied tow^ards Italy,
accompanied by a faithful body of cavalry. But treason seemed
to beset him on all sides. The governor of the province of
Lugdunum {Lyons) treacherously persuaded him to remain in
Gaul, and amused him with deceitful stories of armies thnt
were rising up to support his cause, until the general of the
cavalry of Maximus, the unscrupulous Andragathius, arrived
with a strong body of troops, to whom Gratian was delivered,
to be sacriticed immediately by the hand of an assassin.
The triumph of Maximus was uoav complete, and having no
longer any formidable rival to contend with in the west, he
assumed all the insignia and attributes of empire, conferred the
rank of Caesar on his son Victor, still a child, and sent an
junbassador to the court of Theodosius, instructed to represent
to the eastern emperor that he had been compelled by the
army to assume the purple, to express his grief for the nmrder
of Gratian, which he pretended had been done without his
knowledge, and to offer Theodosius the choice of war or peace.
Theodosius, considering it prudent to temporise, chose the
latter, and it w^as agreed that Maximus should retain Britain,
Gaul, and Spain, leaving to the young emperor Valentinian
the provinces wdiich had been assigned to him by his brother
Maximus now took up his residence in Treves, where he dis-
played the cruelty of his disposition in persecuting some Chris-
tian heretics, with the object, it is said, of conciliating the mo]"e
orthodox Christians in Italy, that they might assist him in his
ultimate designs of reducing* Italy to his obedience. At length,
v»hen the moment appeared favourable for this enterprise, he
began by treacherously obtaining possession of the fortresses
which guarded the passes of the Alps. This w^as no sooner
effected, than the usurper, by a secret and rapid march, canie
unexpectedly with his formidable army before the gates of
Milan. Valentinian fled with his mother, the empress Justina,
and his court, and succeeded in reaching in safety the dominions
of I'heodosius ; while Maxnnus, who had met with no serious
opposition, entered Aquileia as emperoi' of the undivided west.
CHAP. XIV.] FATE OF MAXIMUS. 447
Theodosius was now roused to resistance and reveng'e by this
l)olil usurpation, and having despatched a body of foreign auxili-
aries under Arbogastes, to march along the shores of the Danube,
he placed himself at the head of another army which marched
through Panrionia, while a numerous fleet conducted Valentinian
and his mother back to Italy. JNIaximus had hitherto succeeded
by treason and fraud, and not by arms, and he seems to hav(-
been overcome with the consciousness of the superior military
talents of the adversary with whom he had now to contend.
His troops were defeated whenever they attempted to oppose
the advance of the enemy, and Aquileia itself, in spite of its
impregnable walls, was soon obliged to throw open its gates to
Theodosius. Maximus was taken, and immediately put to
death ; and Arbogastes having by this time advanced into Gaul,
the child Victor Avas also taken, and fell an innocent victim to
the ambition of his father.
The expedition of Maximus has been made by the old his-
torians of Britain a fertile source of fable. It is pretended
that the island was so entirely drained of its population, that
it was never again able to defend itself against its barbarian
invaders ; that the vast host of Britons who followed Maximus
into Gaul settled in Armorica after his defeat, and caused that
country to receive the name of Brittany ; and that the eleven
thousand virgins, who afterwards tigured so prominently in the
Romish martyrology, were maidens sent over from the island of
Britain to serve as Avives to these adventurers. Such stories'
have no foundation in accurate history ; and we have no good
reason for supposing that the usurpation of Maximus had led to
any very formidable invasion of the province in which he had
assumed the purple, although it is not probable that the Picts
and Scots would allow such an opportunity to pass Avithout a,
reneAval of their predatory incursions. All that Ave know is,
that after the death of Maximus, Theodosius marched into
(jaul, Avhere he appointed one of his eastern officers, Chrysan-
thus, to the government of l^ritain. The new vicar probably
carried back Avith him most of the British troops, and perhaps
he took reinforcements. He is said to have restored the island
to a state of trancjuillity. After ruling Britain for a shoi'i
period, Chrysanthus returned to the east, Avhere he Avas made
prsefeot of Constantinople ; and by a singular change of pro-
fession, this minister of the imperial Avill Avas subsequently
made a bishop.
We are now a^-ain left in utter darkness as to the internal
)^
418 THE ROMANS. [chap. xiv.
condition of Roman Britain, but it seems to liave been exposed
to continual attacks from the Picts and Scots, or from the
Saxons. The emperor Theodosius died in 395, and left his
western dominions to be ruled by the feeble Honorius, while
Arcadius governed the east. For a time the talents of Stilicho
arrested the fate of the empire, and it appears that Britain
owed to this great general some years of unusual tranquillity.
In the Notitia Imperii, composed in this reign, we learn the
military force which was then employed for the protection of
the island.* The twentieth legion, vvliich had been so long
stationed at Deva {Chester), had then been entirely withdrawn ;
it is believed to have been taken away towards the end of the
fourth century, to be employed in the Getic war. Two legions,
however, still remained, with numerous bodies of auxdiaries ;
and as these legions were the same that had always been in
Britain, they furnish evidence of the inaccuracy of the state-
ment that the island had been exhausted of its defenders. The
sixth legion remained in its old quarters at Eburacum, but the
second legion had been removed from Isca to Rutupise, in
order, no doubt, that it might be ready to act against the
Saxon marauders, or, in case of need, to be transported into
(Taul. The south-eastern and eastern coasts were strongly
guarded, and in the latter several fortresses appear to have
been newly erected, which are not mentioned at an earlier
peiiod ; such as Othona, on the coast of Essex (the Saxon
Ythanceaster, the site of which is supposed to be now covered
l)y the sea), Gariannonum, in Suffolk (now Burgh Castle), and
l^ranodunnm, in Norfolk (the site of whicli is now called Bran-
caster). The cities and municipal towns no doubt retained
tlieir military organisation ; and in the invasions to which the
island was at this time exposed, they had to provide for thei/
own defence.
In the beginning of the fifth century, the soldiers in Britain
revolted, and conferred the title of emperor on a man named
Marcus, Soon tired of his rule, they slew him in 407, and
chose in his place Gratian, a burgher of one of the towns
in Britain. t This shows the prominent part Avhich the towns
took in the political troubles which then prevailed. Gratian
was allowed to reign four months, and then he also Avas slain.
The lot next fell upon an obscure soldier, who is said to have
* See before, p. 418.
t Apud Britannias Gratianus, municeps ejiisdem insuUie, tyrannu
creatur et occiditur. — Orosius, Mist., lib. vii. c. 40.
CHAP. XIV.] THE USURPEE COXST.\XTIXE. 449
])een chosen merely hecniise liis nniiie was Constantiiie, whieh
was imagined to be a good oineii. It is probable, however,
tliat he possessed other qualities, for lie was lio sooner invested
with the purple than he showed a vigour and decision of cha-
racter equal to the task he had undertaken. He at once col-
lected his army and passed into Gaul, where he was received
as a deliverer, and acknowledged as the emperor of the west.
His reputation and popularity increased, when the Germans,
who had harassed the country, were reduced to submission by
his two praefects, Justinus and Neviogastes.
At this moment (the earlier part of the year 408), the death
of the emperor Arcadius, and the elevation to the throne of the
east of Theodosius 11., occupied the attention of the western
etnperor; but, on the arrival of news of Constantine's revolt,
Stilicho, who was still alive, proceeded to Rome to concei't
measures for suppressing it. He began by sending one of his
generals, Sarus, into Gaul, who defeated the praefect Justinus
in battle, and slew him and a great part of his men. He then
laid siege to Valentia, where he had been informed that Con-
stantine was holding his court. Here Neviogastes ottered to
negotiate, but he was entrapped by Sarus, and treacherously
put to death. Constanthie, not discouraged, appointed two
new praefects, Edovinchus, a Frank, and Count Gerontius, a ^
native of Britain, whose military talents were so well known, \
that Sarus raised the siege of Valentia, and made so hasty a '
retreat before Constantine's troops, that he was obliged to give ;
up his plunder and baggage to the Bagandi, Avho lield the passes /
of the Alps.
Constantine now felt secure in his power, ami he proceeded
to strengthen the frontiers of his territories wiih garrisons and
military posts. He next conferred the dignity of Ca3sar on his
eldest son Constans, whom, it is said, he took from a monastery
to associate with him in the empire. Constans marched with
a part of his father's army into Spain, and, not without some
dithculty, reduced that province also to his sway, and then,
leaving Count Gerontius to command it, returned to Gaul, at a
moment when the death of Stilicho seemed to have relieved the
usurper from all danger. Constantine now followed a policy
simdar to that of Maximus, in sending an embassy to Eavenna
to entreat the forgiveness of Honorius for accepting an empire
which he said had been forced upon him by the soldiery.
Honorius, pressed by difficulties on all sides, reluctantly per-
mitted him to retain the title he had usurped. Constantine
t
450 THE EOMAXS. [criAr. xiv.
afterwards sent Jovius, a man of learning;' aiul talent, as liis
envoy to the imperial court, to ask forgiveness for the murder
of Didymus and Verinianus, two near relations of Honoiiiis,
who had been taken prisoners by Constans in Spain, and lie
succeeded in obtaining a formal recognition of his title.
The snceessful rebel had now to contend with a rebellion
against himself. Constans returned to Spain, carrying with
him a new general, named Justus, whose appointment was so
oifensive to Count Gerontius, that he revolted Avith the army
under his command, and by means of his agents procured a
new invasion of Gaul by the barbarians. Instead of assuming
the purple himself, Gerontius conferred the dignity of emperor
on a man named Maximus, and leaving him to reign in Spain,
pursued Constans across the Pyrenees, and having captured
liim at Vienne, immediately put him to death. He then
marched to besiege the father in the city of Aries. At this
time (a. d. 411), occurred the death of Alaric, and Honorius,
relieved from the terror which the name of the (jothic king-
had so long inspired, sent Count Constantius with a powerful
army to assert his authority in Gaul and Spain. (Constantius
approached Aries at the moment when it was closely besieged
by Gerontius, whose soldiers raised the siege tuuiultuously,
and rising furiously against their commander, put him to death.
Gerontius being thus disposed of, Constantius, wdtli the troops
of Honorius, continued the siege of Aries, and, after defeating a
body of troops which had come to the assistance of Constantine,
compelled him to surrender. He made conditions for his life,
a)id was sent a prisoner to Italy ; but he was privately put to
death before he reached Eavenna.
The triumph of Constantius did not restore Gaul to obe-
dience, and from this time its Avestern provinces, as well as
Spain and Britain, threw of!:* all sid)jection to Home, and began
to rule themselves in their own Avay. This was not in itself a
difficult task, for the cities had always been accustomed to
govern themselves, Avliile the superior government consisted prin-
cipally of the fiscal department and the military command. It
appears by the narrative of Zosimus, that Avhile the usurper
Avas establishing himself in Gaul, Britain had been again visited
by the Saxon invaders, and Ave are assured that the British
cities took up arms to defend themselves, and that they drove
away their assailants.* Their freedom was acknoAAdedged by
* O'iTf ouv £/c tT/s BpsTTatia; o7r\a ei'Ooj/ths, <y(pcoi/ hutwu irpoKivGvvtv-
niAP. XIV.]
THE CITIES m EEITAIX.
4ol
Hoiiorius, who, in 4-10, scut letters to the cities of Britain
exhortino^ them to provide for tlieir own safety.*
We now approach a period, tlie real liistorv of which is
involved in profound obscurity, and to understand it at all we
must o'lance back on what has been already said of the state of
the ishnnd under Roman rule. Tlie municipal cities, as it has
l)een seen, were founded for the secuiity and protection of tlie
province, and by their constitution each was a little republic in
itself, governed by itself, while they wxm'c linked tog-ether only
by the superior fiscal administration which took from them
certain fixed -taxes, by the judicial administration which regu-
lated the relations between them, and by the military command
which held the province and defended it. During four cen-
turies the original population of the island must have been
much diminished, and perhaps, except in particular parts, con-
sisted of little more than the servile peasantry ; f the popula-
tion of the cities had been recruited by the natural increase of
the inhabitants and by arrivals from the continent, and we
have already seen by the inscriptions and other monuments
that the latter class of I'ecruits were becoming more and more
Teutonic. In fact, there can be little doubt that (icrniau
blood predominated, to a great extent, in many of the Koman
cities in Britain, at the time when Honorius gave them entire
independence. They wei'e thus left somewhat in the position
of the free cities of the middle ages, each ruling itself inter-/
nally, within its own massive walls and surrounding territory ,\
and, in external aflairs, either acting by itself or joining in ,
confederacy with other towns.
The invasions of the Saxons resembled much that of the
Danes at a later period. At first mere predatory attacks, they
had gradually made their leaders acquainted with the islauc'
and its inhabitants, and these appear to have attempted soon to
ibrm permanent settlements, selecting just the same coast dis-
tricts as were chosen by the Danes for the same purpose. It
seems to be the received opinion that the title littns Saxouicum,
rrawTs<;, 7/A.£uOtija)(r«f tmu ktr LKELfxtvuiu ^ap^dpcov Tag ttoXei?. — Zosilli/(s\
lib. vi. c. 6.
* 'OvMfiiov ok ypi'i/uL/mdaL Trpo? Tag kv BpETTauia xp^craptvov iruXiig^
(pvXitTTtadai TTapayyiWouTL. — Zoslni/ts, lib. vi. C. lU.
t Some confusion hus been created by mi.sunderstandint? the term Britons
as used by the later historians, who apply it to the Roman population born
in the island, and not to the ori<>inal Celtic race. In the same way the
later writers apply the term Celtic to the Romano-Gallic population (jf
Gaul, to distin<;ui.sh it from the Teutonic invaders from the other side of
the Rhine.
iii7
4
4o2 THE r.OMAXS. [chap. xiv.
applied to the coasts of Suffolk and Norfolk (luriiig Hie later
Hoiiian period, indicates that there was a Saxon population
there, subject of course to the Eoman government. It was
])erhaps also the case in other parts of the kingdom. When
new invasions took place, these settlers probably often rose to
join their brethren. The latter, during the divisions of the
island under the later emperors, were frequently called in by
one party in the island as allies, and they took part in the
attempt to throw off the yoke of Rome. AVhen, therefore, the
British cities were left to themselves, it is natural that they
should become more intimately connected, either as friends or
foes, with the Teutons from the Rhine and the Elbe. It seems
certain that in some parts, especially in some of the cities, the
transition from Roman to Saxon was gradual, and that the two
races mixed together. At Canterbury, Colchester, Rochestei-,
and other places, we find Roman and Saxon interments in the
same cemetery ; and in the extensive Saxon burial-ground at
Osengal, in the isle of Thanet, a Roman interment in a leaden
coffin was met Avith. The result of the discoveries which have
been made in the researches among the Saxon cemeteries has
been to render it more and more probable that the Saxons were
gradually gaining a footing in the island before the period at
which the grand invasions are said to iiave commenced.
The Picts appear to have entered the Roman provinces, not
by scaling the wall, according to the vulgar notion published
under the name of Gildas, but from the Solway, where they
were joined by the Scots, or Irish, and thence they spread
themselves over the north-eastern parts of England. When we
excavate the sites of Roman toAvns in this part of the countiy,
we still meet with traces of their destructive progress. Thus,
Avhen the interior of the station at Maryport, in Cumberland,
was excavated in 1766, the workmen Ibund the arch of the
gate beaten violently down and broken ; and on entering the
great street, tliey discovered evident marks of the houses having
been more than once burnt to the ground and rebuilt, as though
the place had been several times taken and recovered. At Rib-
chester, in Lancashire, the important Roman town supposed to
be Coccium appeal's to have betni destroyed in one of these later
inroads. In the course of excavations made thei'e in the earlier
part of the present century, the ruins of the temple of Minerva
were discovered ; they presented indisputable proofs of its
having been burnt, and among the ddhrh Avere found skeletons,
no doubt those of soldiers who had here made their last stand
CHAP. XIV.] R.WAGES OF THE BARBARIANS. 453
ao'aiiist tlie assailants. It was a parallel storv to that of the
destruction of Camulodununi by the tierce troops of Boadicea.
It is also worthy of remark, that all the Roman towns on the
Welsh border to the north of Gloucester were destroyed, appar- ^^^
ently, before the period of the Saxon invasion.
Such are the sli<i;ht and rather va,<2;ue notions we can form
of what took place in Britain after the cities were left to take
care of themselves. It was not an independent state, but a
number of small independent republics, which of course had a
common interest ao;ainst invaders, but which would most pro-
bably be soon divided into hostile confederacies among'st them-
selves. In these intestine wars, the prevalence of Teutonic
blood in the population of so many of the towns would naturally
lead them to call in Teutonic allies, and we c;;n thus easily
nnderstand how Angles and Saxons were gradually establishing
themselves on the eastern and south-eastern coasts, while the
western districts were harassed by continual invasions of Picts
and Scots. The only allusion to these events by a contem-
]iorary writer is found in the Chronicle of Prosper of Acjuitaine,
about A. D. 455, who states that in the eighteenth year of the
reign of Theodosius the Yonnger (a. d. 441), Britain, after yy^
many slaughters and revolutions, was reduced under the rule of i^
tlie Saxons.*
The period which intervened, left a bhmk by contemporary
annalists, was at a later period filled up with fable. According
to the tract which goes under the name of Gildas, wdien Maximus
carried with him the soldiery of Britain to establish his usurpa-
tion in Gaul, he left the island not only destitute of military,
but without men capable of bearing arms, and it was thus
exposed in a state of helplessness to the attacks of the bar-
barians. The British soldiers and youths, we are told, never \
again returned, and ' for many years ' the Britons groaned j
under the cruel oppressions of the Picts and Scots. f At/
length, their power of forbearance being exhausted, they sent
an embassy to Eome, offering as suppliants to submit to the
authority of the emperor if he would render them assistance."
In his compassion for their sad condition, the emperor forgot
their past rebellion, and sent a legion to help them, who
* Britanni.-v usque ad hoc teinpus variis cladibus eventibusque lata?, in
ditioneni Saxonum redig:untur.
t Exinde Britannia, onmi arinato niilite, militaribusque copiis, rectori-
bus linquitur immanibus, ingenti juventute spoliata, qua? condtata vesti-
giis supradicti tyvanni donium nunquaiu ultra rediit, ki^. — Gildas, § 14.
454
THE SAXONS.
[OHAP. XIV.
-/-
defeated the invaders witli terrible slaii;2,"liter. Before the
leg'ion returned, tliey showed the Britons how to build a wall
f-cross the island from sea to sea, as a defence against the bar-
barians ; but they were so unskilful as to build it of nothing
but turf, and the Roman soldiers were no sooner gone than the
Picts and Scots, despising such a barrier as this, spread them-
selves again over south Britain, and committed greater havoc
than ever. 'And now again,' says the writer we are quoting,
' the Britons sent suppliant ambassadors, with their garments
rent and their heads covered with ashes, imploring assistance
from the E-omans, and, like timorous chickens, crowding under
the protecting wings of their parents, that their wretched
country might not altogether be destroyed, and that the Roman
name, which now was but an empty sound to fill the ear, might
not become a reproach even to distant nations. Upon this, the
Romans, moved with compassion, as far as human nature can
be, at the relation of such horrors, send forward, like eagles in
their flight, their unexpected bands of cavalry by land and
mariners by sea, and, planting their terrible swords upon the
shoulders of their enemies, they mow them down like leaves
Avhich fall at the destined period.' On this occasion the;
Romans were more generous than before, for they helped the
natives to build a stone wall from sea to sea (the Wall of
Hadrian) ; and they raised fortresses at stated intervals along
the south-eastern coast. When they were gone, the Picts and
Scots reappeared. Throwing up hooks, they pulled the Britons
down from the top of their wall, and slew them, and then,
passing the wall, they destroyed the cities and murdered the
inhabitants. At length the Britons made a third appeal to
Rome, and, addressing themselves to ' a powerful Roman
citizen ' named vEtius, in a letter entitled ' the groans of the
Britons,' they implored assistance in the most piteous terms.
This, however, could no longer be given, and the Britons were
h^ft to the accumulated evils of invasion and famine. After a
while, however, came peace and plenty, and then the Britons
fell into luxurious habits, became proud and turbulent, and
quarrelled among themselves. ' Kings were annointed, not
according to God's ordinance, but such as showed themselves
more cruel than the rest ; and soon after they were put to
death by those who had elected them, without any inquiry
into their merits, but because ethers still more cruel were
chosen to succeed them.' At length rumours came of a new
and terrible invasion of the Picts and Scots, and the British
CHAP. XIV.] HISTORTCAL LEGENDS. 4o5
chiefs \uM a council under their proud tyraut Gurtlirio-eni
(Vortig-cni), and came to tlie fatal resolution of calling- in the
Saxons. These, thong-li broui;-ht in peaceably, became worse
tyrants than the Picts and Scots, until at leng-th the Britons
I'ose under Ambrosius Anrelianus, 'the only one of the lioman
nation who had been left alive' in the island, and then followe(
a Ions* struii"U'le between the Britons and the Saxons, until the
o Do ^ '
latter finally established themselves in tiie land.
Such is the uarrative which has been usually taken for the
history of Britain during- the first half of the fifth century. Its
composer Avns ignorant of the events wdnch followed the usurpa-
tion of Maximus, as well as of the early Saxon invasions ; he
adopted later and vulgar l(!gends relating- to the two walls, and
he evidently misunderstood and misplaced the usurpations of
Marcus, Gratian, and Constantine, who were probably the cruel
kings to whom he alludes. In fact, the whole story, built ap-
jjarently on some slight notes in an old continental chroniclej-,
displays the most profound ignorance of the period to which it
relates. All we know relating to the book ascribed to Gildas
is. that it existed before Bede — the style of its Latinity appears
to me to be of the latter part of the seventh century, and these
brief notices of history seem to be founded partly on Saxon
traditions. This, however, is not the place to discuss the
question of its authenticity.
Bede has adopted the narrative of Gildas, only-adding to it
some circumstances from more authentic historians, and tiie
account of the Saxon invasion from the traditions of his own
countrymen. Here he is unfortunately very brief. He tells us
that the Teutonic settlers came hither under their two chiefs,
Hengest and Horsa, in the year 449, and that they were
received in peace, and allowed to settle in the isle of Thanet.
Their success he says, induced others to follow in greater
numbers, wdio were also received into the island as friends and
allies. They consisted of three of the bravest of the Teutonic,
tribes — ^the Saxons, Angles, and Jutes. The Jutes formed the\
population of Kent, the Isle of Wight, and the opposite coast \
district. The Saxons established themselves in Essex, Middle- I
sex, and Wessex. The Angles occupied East-Anglia, the C
country of the Middle- Angles, Mercia, and all the northern )
parts of the kingdom. ^
The ordinary notion, that the first settlement was that under
Hengest and Horsa, has arisen from the circumstance that the
Anglo-Saxon accounts of these events were founded on the
)
X
456 THE SAXONS. [chap. xvi.
traditions of Kent. It is probable, liowever, tliat tliey had been
preceded by the Angles in the north, for when we first become
acquainted with them, this tribe appears to have been long- in
undisputed possession of the whole country from the Humber
to the wall of Antoninus, which was formed into two kingdoms,
that of Bernicia and that of Deira. Eburacum, to which the
Angles gave the name of Eofor-wic, afterwards con-upted into
York — the important town on the w^all, Pons iElii, which
was under the Saxons still a great commercial town, known by
the ftame of Munuces-ceaster (Monk's-chester) — with others
of the Roman towns in Yorkshire, appear to have passed
peaceably or by treaty under the rule of the settlers ; while
others, more especially in Northumberland and the lowlands of
Scotlarul, had perhaps been destroyed before their arrival.
The presumption, however, is that the settlement of the Angles
in the north had begun at a very early period after the island
lad been abandoned by the Romans, and that they had been
called in to the assistance of the northern towns.
The Saxon Chronicle, composed ages afterwards, gives us the
first narrative of the wars between the Saxons and the Britons
in the south, after the former had gained a footing there ; it is
founded on the Anglo-Saxon traditions, perhaps on poems, and
there are many circumstances about it which wouki lead us to
>J-. believe that it is partly romance. Even the names of Hengest
and Horsa are supposed to be mythic* The Saxon Chronicle
informs iis^ that in the year 455, or six years after the arrival
of Hengest, a battle was fought at ^geles-throp in Kent
{AyleHford), between the Saxons under Hengest and Horsa,
and the Britons under Vortigern, in which Horsa was slain ;
and according to Bede, who also mentions this battle, his tomb
was still shown at a place which, was called by his name — it is
said to be the modern Horsted. After this, the Chronicle tells
us, Hengest and .^sc^ his son, obtained the Kentish kingdom.
The royal race of Kent w^as called, after the latter, TEscingas.
Next year, Hengest and iEsc defeated ' four troops ' of
Britons at a place called Crecganford {Crayford), Avith great
slaughter. In 457 there Avas another battle at Crecganford,
in which the Saxons slew four thousand men, ' and the Britons
then forsook Kent, and in great terror fled to London.' Eight
* On the un-histovic character of the narrattves of the Saxon invasion of
Britain, the reader is referred to a rather lonj? dissertation in Lappenberji's
' England under the Ang-lo- Saxons ' (Thorpe's TiMnslation), and to Kem-
ble's ' Saxons in England.'
CHAP. XIV.] FIRST SAXON IXVASIOXS. 457
years afterwards, in 465, Hena-est and ^Esc are said to have
IbuLi-lit 'against the Welsli ' at Wippedes-fleot, a place of
which we are not acquainted with the modern representative,
l;ut which is said to have received that name from Wipped, a
Saxon ciiief wlio was shiin on this occasion. We are iid'orined
that 'twelve Welsh eahionnen,' or chiefs, were slain in this
battle. After eight years again, in 473, there was another war
between the Kentish Saxons and the Britons, and ' the Welsh
tied from tliem like tire.' * After this date, we hear no more of
the Kentish kingdom and its wars, except that ^'Esc succeeded
to the kingdom in 488, until the accession of king Atlielbeit or
Ethelbert, in 565. The principal iloman towns of Kent seem
to have passed into the possession of the Saxons peacefully.
Heugcst and Horsa are said to have tirst landed at Ypwines-
Heot {Ebbs-Jleet), and the Saxons no doubt innnediately received
Rutupiae {Rlchborougli) into their hands. Durovernum tliey
made their capital, ahd on that account it received the name of ^
C'antwara-byrig, the city of the Keutishmen, now Canterbury ;
Dubrse and E-egulbinm retained their original names, slightly
changed into Dover and Eeculver ; and DurobrivjB was called,
it is said, from a chief who ruled over it, Hrofes-ceaster, the
Chester or city of Hrof, now Rochester.
Leaving the history of Kent, the Saxon Chronicle, taking np
another set of traditions, tells us, that in the year 477, the
Saxons, under iElla and his three sons, Cymen, Wlencing,
and Cissa, landed on the southern coast, at a place named after
one of the sons, Cymenes-ora {Keynor on Sdsea), ' and there
they slew many Welsh, and some they drove in flight into the
wood that is named Andredes-leah,' the Roman Slloa Aiiderlda.
^EUa and his sons, like Hengest and Horsa, came in three
ships. Here, again, eight years passed nntil the next great
struggle between the followers of /Ella and the Britons. l\\.
*' The reader must bear in mind, tliat Britons and Welsh are merely
lieueval terms applied by the Saxons to the Romanised population of the
island. The former was, of coui'se, merely the Roman name, as they
adopted it. The word AVelsh [icilisc, wcei/'sc) meant simply a foreigner,
one who was not of Teutonic race, and was applied especially to nations \
using the Latin language. In the middle ages the French language, and, I
in fact, all those derived from Latin, and termed on that account iu/r/aee I
Roma)ne, were called in German IFelsch. France was called by the me- •
dia3val German writers daz xvelschc Unit, and when they wished to express
' in the whole world,' they said, in alien icelsehen n)i(l in tlutscheu richeii^
in all Welsh and Teutonic kingdoms. In modern German the name
irdlsch is used more esyjecially for Italian. It was in its primitive sense
that the Saxons applied the name to the Britons, aad ffom Ihem it has come
gradually to its pri'sent restricted use.
si
s/
i<'>S THE SAXOXS. [CHAP. xiv.
485, iElla foug'lit against the Britons near tlie banks of tlie
Mearcrsedes-bnrna, and the battle is represented, in traditions
gathered by a later writer, to have been obstimitely fonght, and
to liave had a doubtful result. Eor six years both pai'ties
seemed to have remahied in peace; and then, in 491, in con-
sequence, it is said, of new arrivals from the continent, the
Saxons recommenced the war, and iElla and Cissa laid siea-e to
the ancient Eoman city of Anderida, which was called by the
Saxons Andredes-ceaster.' It is said to have been reduced by
famine, and the Saxons, irritated at its long and obstinate
defence, slew all the inhabitants. The massive walls of the
ancient city are still seen at Pevensey. Thus was established
the kingdom of the South-Saxons, or Sussex. Here the coun-
li-y was evidently dependent on the Roman city, and was only
conquered when that city was taken. The other lloman city,
Eegnum, probably submitted without a siege, and received the
name of Cissan-ceastei', the Chester or fortified town of Cissa,
since softened down into Chichester.
The Saxon Chronicle next informs us, that in 495, another
body of Saxons, under two chiefs, Cerdic and his son Cynric,
landed from five ships at a place called Cerdices-ora, on the
coast of Hampshire, ' and the same day they fought against the
Welsh.' Six years afterwards, another Saxon chief, named Port,
with his two sons, Bieda and Alsegla, landed at a place named,
it is pretended, from him, Portsmouth,* and there fought with
tlie Britons, and 'slew a young British man of high nobility.'
In 508, another great battle was fought by Cerdic and Cynric,
in which a British king named Natan-leod and hve thousand
men were slain. 'After that the country was named Natan-
lea, as fciras Cerdices-ford {CViarford) .' In six years again (a. d.
514), Cerdic's two nephew^s, Stuf and Wihtgar, came with three
more ship-loads of Saxons, and landed at Cerdices-ora. The
Britons were still there to oppose them, but the new-comers
were victorious in battle. Cerdic and Cynric are stated to have
established the kingdom of the West-Saxons in 519, in which
year they defeated the Britons in a great battle at Cerdices-ford.
In 527 they gained another great battle at a place called Cerdi-
ces-leah. During the intervening years, Cerdic was, no doubt,
occupied in strengthening and regulating his conquest ; the
lloman city of Venta had passed over to him, and under the
* This is most undoubtedly a legendary derivation, and should make us
the more cautious in receiving' the statements of the Chronicle with regard
to these early events.
CHAP. XIV.] WARS OF THE S AXONS. 450
name of the Wiritau-ceaster {JFlucheder), which, no doubt,
iiieaus the Chester of Venta, was made the capital of the West-
Saxons. The last exploit of Cerdic and Cynric recorded in the
Chi'onicle, is the conquest of Wight from tlie Jutes ; Cerdic
died in 534, and his son g-ave the Isle of Wight to Stuf and
Wihtgar, who had probably been instrumental in its conquest.
Cynric soon sought to extend his kingdom. In 552 he de-
feated the Britons in a battle near the Koman city of Sorbiodu-
num, called by the Saxons Searo-byrig (now old Sarnm). He
(bed in 560, and was succeeded by his son Ceawlin, whose
power extended into Surrey, and he was engaged in resisting
an attack from Athelbert, king of Kent; after which he ex-
tended his conquests northwards, so far as to make himself
master of some of the principal towns in the modern counties
of Bedford, Buckingham, and Oxford. He next pushed his
conquests westward; and, in 5 77, Ceawlin and his brother
Cuthwine, or Gutha, defeated the Britons in a great battle at
Deorham {Derhani) in Gloucestershire, and obtained possession
of the three great Roman cities of Glevum, Corinium, and Aquae
Solis, which became known to the Saxons by the name of Glev-
ceaster or Gleow-ceaster {Gloucester), Cyren-ceaster {Clreu-
ceder), and Bathan-ceaster {Bath).
We have no information to enable us to judge on what
authority the dates of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle during this
period rest; but the singular manner in which one kingdom
begins to be founded, after the preceding kingdom had been
estabbshed, cannot tail to arrest our attention. It seems as
though the brief narrative had been abridged from some memo-
rial poem, whei-e the compiler mistook the order in which the
establishment of the different kingdoms was told, as indicating^
the succession of dates at which they took place. It certainly
appears more probable that the invasion of the Teutonic tribes
took place nearly at the same time, or in rapid succession one after
another ; and we might expect them to have begun in the north.
Tlie Saxon Chronicle, compiled in Wessex, gives little in-
formation on the progressive establishment of the kingdoms
founded by the Angles. We are merely informed that, in
547, Ida began to reign in Northumbria, and that he built a
town which was called, in honour of his wife Bebba, Bebban-
byrig {Bamhoroiujlt). In 560 Ida died, and was succeeded by
his son ^lla. According to an obscure tradition, the Saxons
first landed in Essex, under their king J^scwine or Ercenwine,
as early as the year 527 ; thev probably only came to strengthen
2 r '
-f
H-
460 THE SAXONS. ♦ [chap xiv.
t]\e older settlements on what had long been known as the
Saxon coast. Camulodimum and other towns seem to have
been occupied without any resistance. The coasts to the north
of them were seized by the Angles, who appear to have con-
sisted of two tribes, distinguished bv their positions as the
North-folk and the South-folk (Norfolk and S/ffolk). Their
])o\ver extended over Cambridgeshire and into Lincolnshire. It
Avas from settlements in the north of the latter county that
another branch of the Angles extended themselves so rapidly
through the heart of England, until they reached the borders of
(Wales, and intrenched upou the West-Saxons to the south.
They took the name of Myrce, which has been Latinised into
Mercians, The great extent of ground which the Angles oc-
cupied in Britain is quite sufficient to explain the statement of
the old historians, that they had completely evacuated theii'
native land, and left it uninhabited. From them, as the
earliest settlers, and the most numerous, the island became
known among foreign writers by the names of Anglla and
Anglormii terra, and among the Saxons themselves it was
usually called Engla-land {England), and the language of its
irdiabitants Englisc (English). The population of the Teutonic
portion of the island is still known by no other name than that
of Englishmen.
The Teutons who had come into the island at an earlier
period as auxiliaries, had always, as a matter of course, con-
formed to the religions forms and laws of the Romans ; but
now they preserved their own religion and their own institu-
tions. Saxon paganism was everywhere substituted for Roman,
and it was only perhaps in a few cases — chietly, we may suppose,
in the towns — that individuals preserved for a while their ]-espect
for Roman gods, or their attachment to Roman ceremonies.
The latter are sometimes traced in Saxon cemeteries, where a
Roman interment is found in the midst of graves of undoubted
T'eutonic character. This is the only indication we have of the
transition, and it would be difficult to point out an exact date
when pure Saxon interments began. We have less difficulty in
fixing the other limit.
The Latin language, too, continued probably for some time
to be in use in the towns. I believe indeed that when the
Angles and Saxons came into Britain they found the people
talking not a Celtic dialect, but Latin, and hence when they
formed the English language, the foreign words introduced into
it were not Celtic but Latin. I think I have traced the citizens
CHAP. XIV.] THE LANGUAGE. 461
of English towns speakiuf^ Latin at a later period, and we find
that it was the earlier language of our municipal records and
deeds, and of the inscriptions on monuments. There was a
Celtic people in modern Gaul, the Armoricans, who talk a
Celtic dialect down to modern times, and who issued forth on
piratical excursions on the sea about the time of the Saxon in-
vasions ; and these Armoricans invaded Cornwall and Wales ap-
parently about the time of the Anglo-Saxon invasions of Britain,
and they appear to liave formed the population of the Cornish
peninsula and of the principality of Wales. The remarkable
similarity between the Celtic languages of Cornwall and Wales
and that of the Bretons of Gaul has been frequently pointed
out, and we may perhaps be justified in considering that our
Welsh were really a Breton settlement from Gaul about the;
time of the Saxon invasions of our island, and that they by no
means represent the original Celtic population of Britain, the
ancient Britons, and that the Welsh language was not the
British. There appear to be reasons for believing that that
was similar to the modern L'isli.'^'
The traffic in slaves prevailed very extensively among all the
Teutonic peoples, and it is frequently mentioned or alluded to
in the early historical records of Saxon England. We are told
that, during the pontificate of Pelagius IL, some boys from
Saxon Britain, distinguished by their beauty, were exposed for
sale in the slave- market at Eome. The priest Gregory, as he
passed through the ancient forum, Avas struck with their appear-
ance, and on being told that they were Pagans from Britain, he
lamented that people having such bright countenances slioidd
remain a prey to the spirit of darkness. Continuing the con-
versation, with the same play upon words, he was told that they
were called Angles, upon which he observed that it was a just
name, for they had angelic faces, and ought to be the co-heirs of
angels in heaven. He then asked the name of the province
from which they came, and was told that it was the kingdom of
Deira. ' It is well,' he said, ' they shall be de ira eniH.
snatched from the wrath and brought to the mercy of Christ."
He was next told that the name of their king was J^lla.
' That,' he said, ' is Alleluiah, and it is right that the praise
of God should be sung in that land.' Full of projects of con-
version, Gregory hastened to the pope, and begged to be eni-
ployed on this distant mission ; but the citizens, with whom he
* See what has boon siid on this subject in a former chapter, at p. 219
uf thi.s vuluine.
)^
462 THE SAXOXS. [chap. xiv.
was extremely popular, were unwilling to allow of liis absence.
Xothin<>- further, therefore, was done towards the conversion of
the Anglo-Saxons, until, in 590, Gregory himself was elected
to the papal see. The Anglian children were then remembered,
and Gregory despatched missionaries under the guidance of St
>J Augustine to visit the distant island. Their zeal, however, was
not equal to that of their employer ; for they had proceeded no
further than Provence, when they were so alarmed by the de-
scriptions of the barbarous character of the Anglo-Saxons, that
Augustine was sent back to Eome to obtain the revocation of
their mission. Gregory exhorted him to persevere, gave him
hitters of recommendation to the Frankish kings, Theoderic and
Theodebert, and to their grandmother Brunhilda, as well as to
the Prankish bishops, who furnished them with interpretei-s.
In the year 597, Augustine, with, it is said, above forty
nio:d<;s, landed in the isle of Thanet, no doubt in the old
Roman port of Rutupise ; from whence he sent a messenger to
Etlieibert, king of Kent, to announce the object of his mission.
It happened that Ethelbert had married Berta, the daughter
of Charibert, king of Paris ; and it was one of the terms of the
marriage contract that, as a Christian princess, she should b(;
allowed the free exercise of her faith, and that she should
retain for that purpose the Frankish bishop Liudhard, who had
accompanied her to England, and who now officiated in the
little church of St Martin, near Canterbury. Christianity was
not thus totally unknown among the Kentish Saxons. Ethel-
bert received the message of the missionaries with favour, and
directed that they should remain for the present in Thanet. A
few days after he went to visit them, and gave audience in the
open air; for, influenced by the ancient superstitions of his
forefathers, he feared that if he received them in a house, they
might get the better of him by magical arts. It is recorded,
that when the king liad patiently listened to what they had to
say, he replied, ' Your words and promises are very fair, but
as they are new to us, and of uncertain import, I cannot so far
approve of them as to forsake that which I have so long fol-
lowed with the whole English nation. But because you are
come from afar into my kingdom, and, as I conceive, are
desirous to impart to us those things which you believe to be
true, we will not molest you, but give you favourable enter-
tainment, and take care to supply you with your necessary
sustenance ; nor do we forbid you to preach and gain as many
as you can to your religion.' The Roman monks m:irche.l in
I
CHAT. XIV.] CONVERSION OF THE ANGLO-SAXONS. 463
solemn procession to Canterbury, where tliev established them-
selves, and of which city Augustine was subsequently made the
lirst bishop.
The new faith was ultimately accepted by king Ethelbert,
and soon spread with extraordinary rapidity ov^r Kent, and
through the other kingdoms wherever that king's influence ex-
tended. The East-Saxons received baptism in 604; and in
(i07, tlie year of the battle near Chester, rendered celebrated by
the slaughter of the Welsh monks, the faith of the Gospel must
have been established far towards the west. With the mass of
the people conversion wus at tirj,t a n.cie change of forms, and
they easily resumed their old customs ; and it naturally took
some years to make the change permanent. Thus Augnstiuc
had appointed Mellitus bishop of London, and he is said to
have selected there the site of a ruined temple of the Roman
])eriod to build a church, no doubt because it furnished an un-
occupied place and ready materials. The Saxon Chronicle
informs us, that after Mellitus became bishop of Cantei'bnry,
an event Avhich is generally placed in the year 619, 'then the
men of London, where Mellitus had been formerly, became
heathens again.' The example had already been set them by v/
the East-Saxons, and even by the Kentish men, after the death ■
of their first Christian kings.
The progress of the Christian faith among the Anglo-Saxons
was, on several occasions, materially assisted by intermarriages
among their chiefs. Ethelbert of Kent, before the arrival of
the missionaries, had married a Christian lady, the daughter of
a Erankish king. The king of Essex, who first received the
Gospel, had married a daughter of king Ethelbert, who was also
a Christian. Another daughter of Ethelbert, Ethelberga, was
married to Edwin, king of the Northumbrians, and she no
doubt paved the way for the preaching of Paulinus. The con-
version of king Edwin took place in the year 626. The West-
Saxons were converted by l^irinus in 635 ; the East-Angles
had embraced the ucav faith under their kii.g Earpwald, about
the year 632 ; but the Middle-Angles were not converted until
the reign of Peada, the son of l^enda, about the year 653. This J
king became a Christian on marrying a daughter of the king of
the Northumbrians, and from Lincolnshire, the country of the
Middle- Angles, the faith soon spread through the extensive
dependencies of Mercia. At this time the faith of Christ had
penetrated into every part of the island, except the small and
secluded kinirdom of the South-Saxons, which was cut oft" from
4t)4
THE SAXONS.
[chap. XIV.
-^
the other Saxon states, and protected in its independence, by
the ancient forest of Anderida, the impervions Andredes-weahl,
As late as the year 681, the people of Snssex remained pag-ans.
Tlieir condition became known to Wilfrid, archbishop of York,
Avho, in returning- from the continent was driven by stress of
Aveather on the coast, and who subsequently founded a monas-
tery on the little island of Sehe-i,
CHAP. XV. T SAXON ANTIQUITIES. 46a
CHAPTER XV.
Anglo-Saxon Antiquities — Barrows, or Graves, and the general Character
of their Contents — Arms — Personal Ornaments ; Fibulae, &c. — An^lo-
Saxon Jewellery — Pottery — Glass — Other Articles found in the Bar-
rows ; Bowls, Buckets, &c. — Coins — Early Anglo-Saxon Coinage.
We derive our antiquities of the period of Anglo-Saxon
paganism almost entirely from one source, the graves. It hap-
])ens, however, fortunately for the study of the history of this
])eriod, that the contents of the Anglo-Saxon graves are par-
ticularly rich and interesting, and that we are enabled, from the
various articles found in them, to form a tolerable estimate of
the civilisation of our ancestors before the days of St Augustine.
The Anglo-Saxon graves occur generally in extensive groups,
and on high ground. They are found thickly scattered over
the downs of Kent, Sussex, and the Isle of Wight. Extensive
cemeteries have also been found in Gloucester and Oxford-
sliire, as well as in Leicestershire, Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire,
Northamptonshire, Lincolnshire, Cambridgeshire, Suffolk, and
Norfolk, and in Yorkshire. They exist, no doubt, in other
counties, where they have not been explored.*
* The larg'est and most important collections of Ang-lo-Saxon antiquities
are those of Lord Londcsboroug:h, the late Dr Faussett of Heppin<iton neai-
Canterbury, and the late Mr W. H. Rolfe of Sandwich, all taken from
barrows in Kent. The two latter collections are now in the possession of
Mr Joseph Mayer of Liverpool. Smaller private collections are found in
different parts of England, and a few articles belonging to this class are
met with in most local museums ; but there is as yet no public collection
of early Anglo-Saxon remains of any importance. The most valuable work
on the subject is the * Nenia ' of Douglas, a folio volume published in .
1793. An interesting- volume on the Anglo-Saxon cemeteries in Gloucester- \^
shire, bus been recently published by Mr W. M. Wylie, under the title of
' Fairford Graves ; ' and extensive materials for the archaeology of this
period will be fimnd in Mr Koach Smith's ' Collectanea,' and in some ut"
the volumes of the ' Arcba^ologia.' We may also recommend Mr Aker-
niun's ' Pagan Saxendom.'
466 THE SAXO^fS. [chap. xv.
An Ano-lo-Saxon poem belonginii', no doubt, to tliis primitive
period — the adventures of Beowulf — has been preserved; and,
altliough it has been considerably modified in the transition, it
still gives us gdimpses of the manners of our forefathers before
they had turned from the worship of Woden.* In this poem,
but unfortunately in a part of it which is imperfect in the
manuscript, we find a description of the ceremonies attendant
on the burial of the hero. Beowulf's dying- request was, that
his people should raise a barrow ' on the place of his funeral
pile,' proportionate in size to the celebrity of his deeds. They
accordingly raised a mighty funeral pile to burn his corpse; it
was —
hung round with helmets,
with boards of war {shields)
and with bright byrnies {coats of mail),
as he had requested.
Then the heroes, weeping,
laid down in the midst
the famous chieftain,
their dear lord.
Then began on the hill,
the warriors, to awake
the mightiest of funeral fires ;
the wood-smoke rose aloft,
dark from the lire ;
noisily it went,
mingled with weeping.
After the burning of the body had been completed, Beowulf's
people proceeded to raise —
a mound over the sea ;
it was high and broad,
by the sailors over the waves
to be seen afar.
And they built up
during ten days
the beacon of the war-renowned.
They surrounded it with a wall
in the most honourable manner
that wise men
could desire.
They put into the mound
rings and bright gems,
all such ornaments
* The Anglo-Saxon jjoem of Beowulf was published with an English
translation by my friend Mr J. M. Kemble, in 1837. An edition, in many
7-espects more convenient, was subsequently published by Mr Thorpe, in
1855
CHAP. XV.] ANGLO-SAXON BARROWS. 467
as before * from tlie hoard
the fiei'ce-minded men
had tak(>n ;
they suffered the earth to hold
the treasure of warriors,
g-old on the sand,
where it yet remains
as useless to men
as it was of old. — Beowulf, line 62 ;8.
Wlien the mound was completed, the war-chiefs rode round
it, chanting the praises of their departed king.
In Enghmd we find in the graves of the Saxon period tlie
same mixture of the two modes of interment, cremation and
the burial of the body entire, as among the Romans, but in
different and varying proportions. Tlie custom in this respect
appears to have varied with the different tribes who came into
the island. In the Anglo-Saxon cemeteries in Kent, cremation
v/' is the rare exception to the general rule ; while it seems to have J^^i^
been the predominating- practice among the Apgles, from Nor- ^^^
folk into the centre of Mercia. The poemof Beowulf was -,
perhaps derived from the Angles, and it thus describes the \r^
mode of burning the dead as it existed among them.
The Anglo-Saxon barrows in general have a character very
distinct from those of the Komans or Britons. They were the
prototypes of our modern graves in country churchyards. A
rectangular cist, or pit, was cut in the ground, varying in depth
from thi'ee or four feet to seven or eight, on the fioor of which
the body was laid on its back in full dress, surrounded with a
variety of articles which, no doubt, the deceased had valued when
alive; the grave was then filled up, and a mound of earth raised
above. This mound was termed hlfsw, a hillock, the modern
word low, as in names like Ludlow, which is still used in Derby-
shire, and beorh, beorg, or bearw, a word having the same signiri- y
cation, from wlrch is derived our modern name of barrow. In
Sussex they are still called burghs. Generally, each grave
contains the remains of one body ; but instances occur where more
than one body has been interred in the same grave, and under cir-
cumstances which show that they must have been buried simul-
taneously. We can only account for this by supposing that
they were members of the same family who had been carried
off' by an epidemic disease or slaughtered in a sudden invasion
* Reowulf had sig-nalised himself by killing a dragon which guarded a
hoard of treasures, of which, as a matttT of course, he took possession.
468
THE SAXONS.
[chap. XV.
of plunderers. In the Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Osengal, in
the Isle of Thanet, one grave contained a male and a female
skeleton, laid side by side, with their faces turned toward each
other ; and another contained three skeletons, a lady in the
middle, a man, no doubt her husband, on her right side ; and
a child, apparently a little girl, on lier left ; they lay arm in
arm. More than one instance has occurred where a grave con-
tained all the articles usually interred with a body, but no
traces of the body. A remarkable instance of this was found
in a large Anglo-Saxon grave in the cemetery in Bourne Park,
near Canterbnry. The grave was nearly fourteen feet long,
about half that width, and somewhat more than four feet deep.
The floor was very smoothly cut in the chalk, and surrounded
by a narrow gutter ; and the grave was filled up with fine
mould brought from a distance, and not, as in most other cases,
Avith the chalky soil of the spot. At the foot of the grave, in
the right-hand corner, had stood a bucket, of -wliicli the bronze
hoops, in perfect preservation, occupied their position one above
the other as if the wood had been there to support them. A
little higher up in the grave, in the position generally occupied
by the right leg of the person buried, was found a considerable
heap of fragments of iron, among which were the boss of a
shield of the usual Saxon form, a horse's bit, a buckle, and
other fragments which appeared to have belonged to the shield,
a number of nails with large ornamental heads, with smaller
nails, the latter mostly of brass. From the position of the boss,
it appeared that the shield had been placed with the convex
(or outer) surface downwards. Not far from these articles, at
the side of the grave, was found an iron ring with two smaller
ones attached to it, apparently belonging to the horse's bridle,
or to a belt. On the left-hand side of the grave was found a
small piece of iron resembling the point of some weapon. At
tlie head of the grave, on the right-hand side, was an elegantly-
shaped bowl, about a foot in diameter, and two inches and a half
deep, of very thin copper, which had been thickly gilt, and with
handles of iron. It had been placed on its edge leaning against
the wall of the grave, and was crushed and broken by the
weight of the superincumbent earth. Two small round discs,
resembling counters, about seven-eighths of an inch in diameter,
were found near the head of the grave. They were flat on one
side and convex on the other, the one of bone, while the other
had been cut out of a piece of Samian ware. There was not the
slightest trace of a body having ever been deposited in this
CHAP. XV. J ANGLO-SAXON BARROWS. 469
grave; the appearances were decisive to tlie contrary. Tliis
may be explained by supposing that tlie person for whom the
grave was made had been a chief killed in battle in some distant
expedition, and that his friends had not been able to obtain his
body. It was, in fact, an Anglo-Saxon cenotaph. This view
of the case seemed to be supported by the fact that, although
so many valuable articles were found in the grave, there were
no traces of the long sword and the knife usually found
with tlie bodies of male adults m the Saxon barrows. These
would have been attached to the body itself as a part ot the
dress.
It is a singular circumstance connected with the Anglo-Saxon
graves that human bones are often found among the earth at
tlie top, sometimes in the mound above, and the unexperienced
excavator is discouraged by this discovery, in the belief that tlie
grave has been previously broken up, whereas, when he reaches
the bottom, he finds that the original deposit has not been dis-
turbed.* I can only explain this by the supposition that they
are the bones of slaves or captives, L-..,m as a propitiation to the
shades of their master or mistress, and thrown upon the grave.
We know that the immolation of slaves at funerals was a com- !
mon practice among the Teutonic races. In the northern Edda /
when Brynhild, like Dido, slew herself for her faithless lover,
we are told that she ordered that at her funeral pile two im-
molated slaves should be placed at her head, and two at her
feet.
As I have said, the Anglo-Saxon barrows are generally found
in large groups or cemeteries, and the moimd which covers each
grave is very low, but this is perhaps to be attributed to the
effect of time, as they are generally placed in exposed situations.
But we sometimes find isolated Anglo-Saxon barrows, which we
can only appropriate by the Saxon character of the articles they
contain. Several of these are found in the peak of Derbyshire ;
but they are met with chiefly on elevations near the sea. A
bold conical hill overlooking Folkestone, in Kent, is crowned
with a fine Saxon barrow. The sentiment which led to the choice
of such positions may be gathered from more than one passage
in the poem of Beowulf. It was the hero's dying request to
his people, —
* In a few instances the bones in the upper part of the mound have
been found so much less decomposed than those underneath, that we can
hardly avoid coming to the conclusion that tb'^v belonj;cd to some later
iaternient.
470
THE SAXONS.
[chap. XV.
command the war-chiefs
to make a mound,
bright after the funeral fire,
upon the nose of the promontory ;
which shall for a memorial
to my people
rise high aloft
on Hronesness ;
that the sea- sailors
may afterwards call it
Beowulf's barrow,
when the Brentings
over the darkness of the floods
sliall sail afar. — BeowiclJ\ line .7e599.
The hill of Oseiigal, overlooking Pegwell Bay near Eamsgatc;,
and furnishing- a niagnitioent view of the Channel with the dis-
tant coast of France, is perforated like a honeycomb with the
graves of an immense Saxon cemetery. Here time has entirely
obliterated the barrows which once covered the graves, and the
latter w^ere only discovered accidentally in the course of the
railway cutting. Many of them have been since opened by the
late Mr Eolfe, of Sandwich, and have added considerably to
tlie richness of his museum. The Anglo-Saxons generally
placed their cemeteries on elevated spots, where these coidd be
found in the neighbourhood of their settlements. People seem
to have been carried for burial there from the country at a
distance around; we generally also find Saxon cemeteries in
the immediate neighbourhood of a Eoman city or town, where
it continued to be occupied in Saxon times, and it is not un-
frequently placed on the site of the older Roman cemetery of
the town. Such is the case at Canterbury, Colchester, and
other places.
The Anglo-Saxon was buried in his full dress, with all his
arms and accoutrements. By his side we often find the long
iron sword, the presence of which is, in itself, an unfailing
evidence of the people to whom the grave belonged. These
swords are often nearly a yard long, and Avere evidently in-
tended rather for cutting than for thrusting. They appear
usually to have been double-edged, and the blades are plain,
and nearly uniform in shape. The one represented in our
plate (fig. 5), fc^xivi in the cemetery at Osengal in Thanet,
seems to have had but one edge, with a blunt back. The
hilts appear usually to have been made of wood or some other
})erishable material ; but sword hilts of metal have also been
found, and thev are then extremeiv ornamental. Their general
Anglo-Saxon Weapons, &c.
I
CHAP. XV.] AXGLO-SAXOX SWOEDS. 473
form may be understood by fig. 10 in our plate, which repre-
sents the hilt of a sword found in a barrow at Ash, near Can-
terbury, and now in the collection of Mr Eolfe. The metal
appears to have been g-ilt or silvered. A very handsome hilt of
the same description, found with the sword in the parish of
Coombe, in Kent, is engraved in the second volume of Mr
Eoach Smith's Collectanea; the ornamental parts in this in-
stance were of bronze gilt. Mr Ilolfe also possessed tin;
extremity of a Saxon sword-hilt of silver, ornamented, and bear-
ing an inscription in rudely formed runes, which nobody has /
yet been able to decipher. This curious relic, which was found '
also in the parish of Ash, is engraved in the Archaeological
Album. In the poem of Beowulf, swords are not unfrequently
described as having richly ornamented hilts. Thus one of the
heroes —
gave his oi-namented. swoi'd,
the costliest of irons,
to his servant. — Beowulf^ line 1338.
Aiul in another passage it is said, —
and with it the hilt,
variegated with treasure. — BvowulJ\ line 3.228.
And a little further on tliere is a description particularly intei--
esting as illustrating the description of the sword-hilts just
given, especially of the silver hilt with the runic inscription.
A sword, described as follows, bore not only the name of the
possessor inscribed in runes, but also an episode of the ancient
Saxon mythologv, —
Ho looked upon the hilt,
the old legacy,
on which was written the origin
of the ancient contest ;
after the flood,
the pouring ocean
slew the race of giants ;
dai'ingly they behaved :
that was a race strango
to the eternal Lord,
therefore to them their last reward
through floods of water
the ruler gave.
So was on the surface
of the bright gold
with runic letters
rightly marked.
474 THE SAXOXS. [chai. X7
set and saifl,
for whom that swovd,
the costliest of irons,
was first made,
with twisted hilt and variegated like a snake.
Beowulf, line 3373.
The slieath appears to liave been frenerally of wood, tipped
with metal, and it Avas sometimes covered with, or made en-
tirely of, leather. One found at Strood, in Kent, was covered
externally with a substance resemblinfi- shagTeen. A Saxon
sword found at Faivford, in Gloucestershire, had its wooden
scabbard partly remaining, protected at the top and bottom
with bronze.
On the opposite side of the body from tlie shield, and simi-
larly attached to the girdle, we usually find one or even more
knives. These are nsnally of not very large dimensions, though
they probably served tli': purposes of a dagger as well as those
of a knife. In former days, people did not keep knives for the
use of their guests, but the latter always carried their knives
with them. A small knife is usually found with the other
articles which ap])ear by their position to have been suspended
at the girdles of the Auglo-Saxon ladies. Mr lloach Smith
has engraved an interesting collection of Anglo-Saxon knives in
the second volume of his Collectanea. The four represented in
our plate, figs. 13 to 16, are from the Saxon cemetery at
OsengaL Some antiquaries have supposed that these knives
are the seaxas, from which the Saxons were pretended to have
dt;rived their name.
The figures in our plate, Nos. 6 to 9, are examples of Saxon
spear-heads, obtained from the cemetery of Osengal ; they
represent the usual forms of this weapon. The position of the
shaft in the grave may generally be traced by a long line of
black, decomposed wood, and a ferrule, with a knob or spike, is
sometimes found at the bottom. The spear appears in some
cases to have been seven, or even eight, feet long. A remarkable
spear-head, with four edges, was found in the Saxon cemetery
at Fairford. The spear-heads are usually from ten to fifteen
inches long. Arrow-heads are occasionally found, but they
are rare.
The shield was generally laid flat over the middle of tlie
corpse. It has been traced in some instances to have been
round, and not of large dimensions. It was usually formed of
wood, generallv of the linden tree, which was of a vellow tint.
CHAP. XV.] AXGLO-SAXON WEAPONS. 47o
Hence, tlie poem of Beowulf speaks of ' the broad shield, yel-
low-rimmed,' and it is sometimes railed a ' war-board ' [hilde-
hord). Ill one instance we are told —
he seized his shield,
the yellow linden-wood. — Beowulf, line o21o.
The wood of the shield seems to have been sometimes covered
with leather; and mention is made in Beowulf of a shield of
iron. It may be suspected that tlie round metal shields whicli
have been pronounced to be British, are really Saxon. The
principal relic of the shield found in the g-raves, is the iron boss
which occupied the centre externally, and which has usually
attached to it all or some of the rivets whicli fixed it to the
wood. The usual form of the boss is tliat of a small basin,
tapering- at the top to a point, and endiiio- in a knob. Some
of our old writers on antiquities have indeed taken the Saxon
bosses for basins, and others liave thought them to be skull-
caps, so little observation was made on the circumstances of
their discovery. Fig. 1, in our plate of Anglo-Saxon weapons,
is also rather a common form of the boss of the shield. The
three other bosses represented in the plate are unusual forms ;
fig. 2 was found in a barrow on the Breach downs, and was in
the collection of Lord Londesborough, and fig. 3 was found at
Sittingbourne, also in Kent. Fig. 4 is a very singular boss,
which was found among Anglo-Saxon graves near Driffield,
in the East Riding of Yorkshire ; the boss itself is not of an
unusual form, but it has four circular discs arranged round it, as
represented in the cut.
Strips of iron, formed into different shapes, but evidently
designed to be held by the hand, are often found in Saxon
Braces ot Ansrlo-Saxon Shields,
ixraves, among the remains of the shield, and were supposed by
Douglas to be the braces of bows. This explanation, liowe\er,
476 THE SAXOXS. [chap. \v.
Iiad been lonp; doiibtetl, wlien,in opening; the o;raves at Oseiig-al,
in Thanet, a more careful observation cleared np the nivsterv.
Jn every instance, the article referred to was found in the centre
of the shield, just under the boss, and in such a position that
there could be no longer any doubt of its having been the
liandle of the shield. Two of these handles, from the graves
at Osengal, are represented in the annexed cut. The lower
example retains the rivets by which it was fixed to the woqd of
the shield, in which there was, no doubt, in the middle, a hole
to receive the hand, which was covered by the boss on the out-
side. We thus learn the importance of very careful observation,
^ even of the minute circumstances connected with antiquarian
discoveries.
The (Hscovery of buckles of different forms shows clearly that
the swords and knives were suspended to a girdle drawn tight
round the body. Two such buckles, from the cemetery at
Osengal, are represented in figs. 11 and 12 of our plate at
p. 471. These buckles are often highly ornamented, and they
are sometimes enamelled. We find very little traces of dress
in the graves, though a fragment of the material found some-
times impressed in decomposed metal, seems to show that it was
generally of rather coarse texture. We know from passages in the
poem of Beowulf, that the early Saxons wore armour, apparently
composed of rings, but no very distinct traces of it have yet
been found in the graves. This may, perhaps, be accounted
for by the rapid decomposition whicli articles made of iron
undergo in the ground. Perhaps, moreover, it was not the
custom to equip the body in armour and helmet when it was
buried. The ril)s, or framework, in bronze, of a defensive cap
of some kind or other, supposed to be Saxon, were discovered
on a skull dug up at Leckhanipton Hill, near Cheltenham, and
are preserved in the museum of that town. A framework of a
helmet, not very unlike that at Cheltenham, was taken by Mr
Bateman from an Anglo-Saxon barrow in Derbyshire, and his
description of it is sufficiently curious to be given in his own
words. It had been formed, he says, ' of ribs of iron, radiating
fi'om the crown of the head, and coated with narrow plates of
liorn, running in a diagonal direction from the ribs, so as to form
a herring-bone pattern ; the ends were secured by strips of horn,
radiating in like manner as the iron ribs, to which they were
riveted at intervals of about an inch and a half; all the rivets
had ornamented heads of silver on the outside, and on the front
rib is a small cross of the same metal. Upon the top or crown
CHAP. XV.] ANGLO-SAXON ARMOUR. 477
of tlie helmet, is an elongated oval brass plate, upon wliicli
stands tlie fii;-ure of an animal, carved in iron, now much rusted,
l)ut still a very good representation of a pig ; it has bronze eyes.
There are also many smaller decorations, abounding in rivets,
all which have pertained to the helmet, but Avhicli it is impos-
sible to assign to their proper places, as is also the case with
some small iron buckles.' Mr Bateman adds, that there was
found with the helmet a mass of chain-work, formed of ' a large
quantity of links, of two descriptions, attached to eacli other
by small rings, half an inch in diameter ; one kind is Hat and
lozenge-shaped, about one inch and a half in length ; those of
the other sort are all of one pattern, but of different lengths,
varying from four to ten inches ; they are simply pieces of
square rod iron, with perforated ends, through which are passed
the rings connecting them with the diamond-sliaped links.
Along with them was a six-pronged instrument, similar to a
hay-fork, with the difference that the fang, which, in a fork, is
inserted into the shaft, is in this instance flattened and folded
over, so as to form a small loop, as for suspension. All the
iron articles, except this and the helmet, were amalgamated
together from the effects of rust ; they also present traces of
cloth over a great part of their surface ; it is therefore not
improbable that they may have originally constituted some
kind of defensive armour by being sewn upon or within a
doublet.' Mr Roach Smith has quoted, in illustration of the \
swine or boar on this helmet, passages from Tacitus, and from \
the Anglo-Saxon poem of Beowulf, which shows that that |
animal was a favourite ensign on the helmets and arms of the /
ancient Saxons.*
Another weapon found in Anglo-Saxon graves, though it is
of very rare occurrence, must not be overlooked. This is the
axe, which seems to have been more common among the Franks
tlian among the Saxons in England. The lower of the two
examples given in the accompanying cut was taken from a Saxon
barrow in the isle of Thanet, and is preserved in the museum of
Mr Rolfe ; the axe represented in the upper figure was found
in a grave of this same period, from a cemetery discovered nt
Selzen, in Ehenish Hesse, f and is here given for the sake of
* Cuts of these helmets will be found in Mr Roach Smith's Collectanea,
vol. ii. p. 238.
t A very interesting^ account of this cemetery, which resembled closely
the Anglo-Saxon cemeteries in England, was published at Maintz, in 1S18,
bv the brothers W. and L. Lindenschmidt.
2 G
478
THE SAZONS.
[chap. XV.
\^'
4
Saxon Axes.
comparison. Their identity of form is remarkable. A similarly
shaped axe was found in a grave
at Ash, near Canterbury ; Mr
Eoach Smith possesses one which
was obtained in Berkshire ; and
two or three others have been
found in different parts of Eng-
land.
It will be seen by what has
been already said, and by the ex-
t/ amples given, that the weapons
of our Anglo-Saxon forefathers
were purely Teutonic, and that
so far they had borrowed nothing
of the Romans. In war, they
fought as Saxons : and it was
only when they came in social contact with the people who had
preceded them that they felt the superiority of the Romans in
the arts of peace. The personal ornaments found in our Anglo-
Saxon barrows are numerous, especially in Kent, where the
discoveries hitherto made show a greater degree of wealth and
refinement than in the other Saxon or Anglian kingdoms. Of
all the articles of personal ornament found in the Anglo-Saxon
interments, the fibulce are the most remarkable, and at the
same time the most characteristic ; and they have a peculiar
interest from the circumstance that there are several distinct
varieties, and that the difference arose evidently, not from indi-
vidual caprice, but from the distinctive fashions of the different
races who came into the island. They help to corroborate the
statements of the early Anglo-Saxon annalists of the positions
of these various tribes in Britain. We have given examples of
these different varieties in the accompanying plate.
The first and the richest variety of these ornaments are the
circular fibulae found in the barrows in Kent, of which some
very fine examples are preserved in the museums of Lord
Londesborough, Dr Eaussett, Mr Rolfe (the two latter now
united in the possession of Mr Mayer, of Liverpool), and other
collectors. They are more usually of gold than any other
matei'ial, are genei'ally ornamented with filigree work, and are
set with stones, usually garnets, or with glass or vitreous
pastes, and sometimes with enamel. One of the finest examples
of this class of fibulae was found a few years ago at Sitting-
bourne, in Kent. The form of the ornament was that of a
Anglo-Saxon Fibuloe.
cuAP. XV.] AXGLO-SAXON FIBUL.E. 481
double star, set with garnets, or coloured glass, upon cliequered
fods of gold. The rays of the inner star were of a Ijlue stone.
Between tjie rays of the larger star were four studs, with a
ruby in each, surrounded with a circle of garnets, the spaces
between being tilled up with gold filigree.
A much diminished sketch of this fibula is given in the
upper figure to the left in our plate. In another very hand-
some round fibula in the collection of Lord Londesborough,
found in a barrow at Wingham, in Kent, the outer riin is
bronze, but all the rest gold, set with garnets and blue stones,
as usual, over thin gold foil, which was indented with cross
lines, to give greater brilliancy ; the spaces between the limbs
of the cross or flower formed by the stones were here also filled
up with the twists of gold filigree which are so common in
Anglo-Saxon jewellery. These round fibulae appear to have
been worn by ladies, and from the position in which they are
found they seem to liave been placed on the breast. They
were evidently peculiar to the people of Kent and to the
kindred inhabitants of the Isle of Wight, where examples have
bf,en found. It is very unusual to find them in other parts of
England ; though a very rich gold fibula of this description was
found some years ago at Sutton, near Woodbridge, in Suffolk,
which was covered with filigree work, and had been set Avith
stones and enamel.*
The second class of Anglo-Saxon fibulae present a totally
different type ; they are generally made of bronze or brass,
though they appear in almost every instance to have been gilt.
They have been usually termed cross-shaped, a term Avhich is
not always correct, and we must be careful not to imagine that
the approach to the form of the cross has any connexion witli
Christianity, for there can be little doubt that all these barrows
belonged to the pagan Saxons. Several examples of this class
of fibulae are given in our plate. The upper one to the right
was found at Ingarsby, ten miles from Leicester. It has been
broken, and, as will be seen by comparison with the other
examples, the upper part only remains. When perfect, it must
have been very large, for the part here represented is five
inches in length. The figure immediately below it represents
one of this class of fibulae, of a rather different type, found at
* This beautiful fibula is given in colours, and of the size of the original,
with several other examples of the round Kentish fibula, in a plate in tiie
' Archyeological Album.' Other examples will be found in Douglas's
' Neuia.'
Ib2
THE SAXONS.
[chap. XV.
Stowe Heath, adjoiniii<^ to Icklingham, in Suffolk. The
original is six. inches in length, and it is ornamented, like
others of the same class, with attempts at representing mon-
strous heads. The ornamentation of the large fibulae of this
class is often very elaborate, though rude in character. The
fibulae of this form are found in large quantities in the counties
of Derby, Leicester, Nottingham, Northampton, and thence
through Cambridgeshire, Suffolk, and Norfolk, as well as in
Yorkshire. They were evidently peculiar to the Angles, who
formed the population of Mercia, East-Anglia, and North-
umbria. As shown in the examples just described, some of the
more ornamental ones were of very large dimensions ; but
others, and that by much the most numerous class, are smaller
and plainer. The two examples given in our plate, between
the circular fibulae, both from Stowe Heath, in Suffolk, are
types of rather a numerous class of the smaller fibulae, found
chiefly in Mercia and East-Anglia. Many similar fibulae were
found by Lord Braybrooke in the Anglo-Saxon cemetery at
Wilbraliam, in Cambridgeshire. Sometimes in these smaller
fibulae, the head was formed into a plain trefoil, or clover leaf,
as in the example found in Yorkshire, which is given in fig. 1,
in the cut below. Fibulae of this form were found in the Anglo-
Saxon cemetery at Barrow Furlong, in Northamptonshire, de-
scribed in the thirty-third volume of the Archaeologia. Others
with square heads were found in the last-mentioned cemetery,
one of which is reprosented in fig. 2 in our cut. This class of
Anglo-Saxon Fibulse.
fibulae is fo\md much more rarely out of the Anglian districts.
Some have been found in Kent, difiering a little in form and
CHAP. XV.] AXGLO-SAXOX FIBULJE. 483
ornament, and by no means so common as the circular ones.
We find also in Kent a fibula of this class, but of a peculiar
pattern, having- its head semicircular. One of these, found
near the turnpike road at Folkestone-hill, between Folkestone
and Dover, is represented in fig. 3 in the preceding- page. The
body was of bronze-gilt, the central band had been ornamented
with slices of "-arnet, one of which still remains at the bottom
in a silver rim ; and the projecting buttons in the upper part
had also been set with stones, or with some kind of glass. A
fibula exactly similar to this was found at Osengal in Thanet,
and is in the collection of Mr Roife. Precisely the same type
has been found in Germany and in France. In fact, the class
of fibulae we are now describing is that usually found in the ^
graves of the same period on the Continent, especially in those
of the Franks in Gaul.
The third variety of Anglo-Saxon fibula? is, as far as has yet
been discovered, peculiar to the counties of Gloucester, Oxford,
and Buckingham ; and it can now hardly be doubted that
they belonged to the West-Saxons, but comparatively little
accurate observation has yet been made of Anglo-Saxon
remains found in the purely Saxon districts. These fibula?,
which are also of brass or bronze, are circular, and deeply
concave, or, rather, formed like a saucer. The rim, or side,
is usually plain, but the flat bottom is ornamented with Saxon
tracery. The example represented in our plate at p. 480, is
now in the museiun of Lord Braybrooke, who bought it at
the sale at Stowe, in Buckinghamshire ; it is said to have
been found with a skeleton at Ashendon, in that county, with
a smaller fibula of the same description, which is also in Lord
Braybrooke's collection.* In Lord Braybrooke's example,
which is, I believe, in this respect unique, the centre and the
four points of the cross of the ornament are set with coloured
glass on gold foil, like the circular fibula? of Kent, from which,
in other respects, it differs widely. It is much larger than the
Kentish fibulae, measuring- in diameter nearly three inches and
a half. Others of equal, and of smaller, dimensions have been
found in the counties above mentioned. The field is always
covered with ornamentation of the same class, in some instances
with rude figures of faces and animals, and resembling in style
* It is a proof of the low state of antiquarian science in England till a
very recent date, that, while this fibula was in the collection at Stowe, it
was considered to be one of a pair of scales, and as such it was described
in the sale catalo<>ue.
484 THE SAXONS. , [chap. xv.
and diameter that of the cross-shaped fibulce. Tlie only in-
stance I know at present of the discovery of one of these
ribnlae out of the counties mentioned, occurred in an Anglo-
Saxon burial-place in Yorkshire.
Other small circular fibulae of a much plainer and less clia-
racteristic description are also found with Saxon remains in
different parts of the island. Sometimes they consist of a
circular plate, at others of a mere circular rim, or fiat ring-,
the material being generally of bronze. They are sometimes
ornamented in the style of the fields of the saucer-shaped fibulae,
while in many instances they are merely marked with small
circles, or lines, or are left quite plain. Fibulae of more fan-
ciful forms are also foinid with Anglo-Saxon remains, and not
unfrequently shaped into the rude figure of a bird. Circular
fibulae, apparently of the early Anglo-Saxon period, made of lead,
have also been found, but they are very rare, and possess many
j)('culiarities. Of three which I have examined, one was found
in Yorkshire, and the other two in London. The first is in the
collection of Mr Hargrove, of Y^ork ; it is a thin circular plate
of lead, exactly an inch and a half in diameter, ornamented
with three concentric circles, and a rude figure in the centre.
The outer cn'cle, or rim, is of a chain or cable pattern ; the two
inner circles are hatched in square compartments ; Avhile the
central figure was intended to represent a dragon, with its tail
twisted and inserted in its mouth. In one of the London spe-
cimens, the field in the centre, which is raised above the rest,
bears the figure of a lion ; it is surrounded with a series of con-
centric rings formed of ovals and circles of various sizes. The
other London example, which was in the museum of Mr Hoach
Smith, is still more curious, from the circumstance that the
ornament of the central field is made of a confused mass of
letters, exactlv resemblino' those marked on the earlier Anglo-
Saxon coins.
We have no very distinct notion of the particular use of the
Anglo-Saxon fibulae in attaching the dress, though the larger
and more ornamental ones Avere probably employed in fastening
a mantle. The Kentish circular fibulae are usually found on
the breast, and the others are often in front of the body, some-
. what nearer the girdle. In East-Anglia and Mercia, the cross-
T-shaped fibulae, and, more to the south-west, the saucer-shaped
fibulae, are often found in pairs, either over the breast, or,
especially in the case of the saucer-shaped fibulae, on tlv)
shoulders. It mav be observed, that the buckle of the belt cr
CHAP. XV.] PERSONAL ORXAMEXTS. 485
girdle is often ornamented in the same style as the fibuh^, and
sometimes it bears some resemblance in form to the cross-shaped
variety. The use of other personal ornaments is more exactly
defined by tlieir form and position. Amongst these the most
remarkable and numerous are rings, armlets, ear-rings, hair-pins,
})cn(hints to the neck, and beads.
Eings and bracelets are not found so abundantly as we miglit
expect from the manner in which they are spoken of in the old
Anglo-Saxon poetry, and they are seldom of better material
than bronze. Finger rings of silver have been found in Kent,
but, from their character, it is not improbable that they were
of Roman workmanship. In the cemetery at Barrow Purlong,
in Northamptonshire, only one ring was found, which was on
the finger-bone of one of the skeletons ; it was made simply of
a bit of silver wire, bent into a circle, and tied at the two ends
by twisting the wire. In the graves at Fairford, in Glouces-
tershire, were found several rings of bronze, all of them unorna-
mented. A rather massive bronze spiral ring, perhaps of
Eonian workmanship, was found in a Saxon grave, in the same
county. The Saxon ladies were evidently more anxious to
adorn their heads and necks, than their hands and arms. Ear-
rings are not very uncommon, but they are extremely varied in
form. Sometimes they consist, like the finger-rings, merely of
a bit of- silver wire, either bent into a plain ring, or twisted in
a spiral form. In the Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Chavenage, in
Gloucestershire, was found a pair of ear-rings, formed of thin
plates of silver, shaped like crescents, the ends drawn out fine
and twisted together. Hair-pins are common, and resemble in
character those of the Romans. They are usually of bronze, a
metal the use of which the Saxons probably derived from th(^
people on whose lands they came to reside. They are often
ornamented, and in some cases they seem to have been en-
amelled. A hair-pin with the head set with jewels, was found
in a barrow at Wringham, in Kent. A very highly ornamented
hair-pin, of bronze gilt, found, in a Saxon grave at Gilton, in
East Kent, and now preserved in the Canterbury museum, is
engraved in the second volume of the ' Collectanea Antiqua '
of Mr Roach Smith, who considers it to be of late Roman
workmanship. These pins were no doubt intended, like the
Roman ones, for fastening up the hair behind the head. The
greater immber are mere pins of. bronze, or sometimes of bone ;
but it is remarkable that these plain hair-pins have almost
always a ring at the top, or, at least, the head pierced for one,
v/
•186 THE SAXONS. [chap. xv.
wliicli was, no douljt, intended for attaeliino^ some part of the
liead-dress with which we are unacquainted. The jewellery
suspended round the neck was often rich and highly orna-
mented. A beautiful necklace of stones set in gold, pendent
to a gold band, was found by Mr Bateman, in an Anglo-
Saxon barrow in Derbyshire. Sometimes a gold ornament in
the form of a cross, or a circular bulla, or, in place of these,
a gold lioman or Merovingian coin, was suspended to the
necklace. Examples of all these ornaments are found abund-
antly in the Kentish barrows, but they are rare in other parts
of the kingdom. A few of these necklaces and bullse are re-
presented in our plate, chiefly taken from barrows in Kent.
Fig. 1, from the cemetery at Sibertswold, is curious as inclosing
a K-oman intaglio ; fig. 2, is a gold bulla from Kingston Down :
7 and 8 are examples of the bullae from Breachdown and Wing-
ham ; 3 and 4, beads or ornaments in glass from Sibertswold
and Beakesbourne ; 5 and 6, the parts of a neck-ornament from
Roundway Down, near Devizes, in Wiltshire. There can be
no doubt of these ornaments being of native workmanship,
and they show us to what a high state of perfection the art of
the goldsmith was carried among our forefathers at this early
period. At a later date, the Anglo-Saxons were celebrated
throughout Europe for the beauty of their jewellery, ■ A poem
on the various fortunes of men, in the valuable collection of
Anglo-Saxon poetry called the Exeter Book, describes the high
consideration in which the Saxon goldsmifh was held ; —
For one a wondrous skill
in goldsmith's art
is provided,
full oft he decorates
and well adorns
a powerful king's nobles,
and he to him gives broad
land in recompense.
Beads are found in the Anglo-Saxon barrows in great variety,
and they present a mixture of the common Eoman types and
of others which were doubtless of Saxon manufacture. Per-
haps tiie Roman manufactories of beads continued to exist after
the settlement of the Saxons ; but whether this were the case
or not, it is certain that almost every variety of Roman beads
are found in the Saxon interments. The Roman beads are
generally of glass, while of those which are purely Angi(»-
Saxon a large proportion are of terra-cotta or earthenware, aid
Anglo-Saxon Jewellery.
CHAP. XV.] AXGLO-SAXOX BEADS. 4S9
these are sometimes incrusted with vitreous substances. The
Saxons introduced the same kind of ornament into their eartlien-
ware beads which had been used by the Komans in beads of
glass, and we find them often tastefully variegated with stripes
of different colours. These colours are often very brilliant. A
few examples of the o-lass beads are given in the plate, fig. 5.
Two examples of the striated earthenware beads from the
cemeterv at Osengal, in Thanet, are given in the annexed cut.
Beads from Oscngal.
Other substances used very extensively by the Anglo-Saxons in
the manufacture of beads, were amethystine quartz, which is of
a lilac colour, and amber. Beads appear to have been worn
round the neck very generally by persons of both sexes ; and it
is probable that they were not only considered as personal orna-
ments, but that they were looked upon with a superstitious feel-
ing as preservatives against danger, and especially agamst witch-
craft. This was peculiarly the case with amber, which, according
to the belief of the ancients, protected the person who bore it about
him against the evil spirit. Hence we find continual instances
of interments in which the deceased had merely one bead of
amber attached to the neck, and sometimes it appears to have
been simply placed in the grave by the side of his head. The
lumps of amber were generally made into beads by drilling a
hole through them, without attempting to shape them into
regular form.
At the girdle of the Saxon lady was suspended a bunch of
various small implements, answering to what in modern times
is called a chatelaine, and which appears to have been usually
buried wdth the person to whom it belonged. These articles
appear to have been very numerous, but, unfortunately, from
tlie circumstance of many of them being small, and of iron,
which decomposes rapidly, they are often reduced to mere
shapeless bits of rust. Sometimes, however, they are more
nerfect, and articles of bronze are always better preserved. We
usually find among these articles a small knife — sometimes more
490
THE SAXONS.
[chap. XV.
than one — and a pair of scissors. The scissors, or rather
shears, are almost always of the description represented in onr
cnt on page 409, which were no doubt borrowed from tlie
Eomans; but one or two instances have been met with in
Anglo-Saxon barrows of scissors of the same construction as
those used at the present day. Scissors of this latter descrip-
tion were found in the Saxon burial-place at Driffield, in York-
shire. Needles and pins, made of bronze or bone, are some-
times found ; they had prol)ably been placed in a case or sheath.
Of articles of the toilet found attached to the chatelaine, if we
Anglo-Saxon Tweezers.
may adopt the word, the one of most frequent occurrence is a
pair of bronze tweezers, used, no doubt , for extracting super-
fluous hairs fi-oni the body. This
instrument is so perfectly identical
in form and character with the Ro-
man tweezers, that we might sup-
pose it to be a mere relic of the
Roman period preserved by one of
the Saxon conquerors, if it were not
of such common occurrence in An-
glo-Saxon graves, that it must have
been an article in general use. One
of these bronze tweezers, from the
cemetery at Osengal, is represented
in our cut. A number of small im-
plements resembling bodkins, are
often found attached together by a
ring ; some of them seem to have
been intended for tooth-picks and
others for ear-picks, and they all
sl.o\> Ih'.it the Anglo-Saxon ladies
paid considerable attention to per-
sonal cleanliness. As jl have before
observetl, it would be impossible,
from the state in which they are
generally found, to particularise all Anglo-Saxon LatcIi-keT7(:')
the various articles which the Anglo-
CHAP. XV.]
ANGLO-SAXOX ANTIQUITTES.
491
Saxoii lady carried at lier girdle. Some are almost inexplicable.
The three implements suspended by two rings, represented in the
cut on the preceding page, were found in the cemetery at Osen-
gal, and are in the collection of Mr Eolfe. Tlie only explana-
tion that can be offered is, that they may have been latch-
keys ; but I believe that nothing exactly similar to them has
been found elsewhere to assist in explaining them, though
they may be compared with the Eoman latch-keys, which we
have given at p. 400. Another class of objects, found always
with the articles hung to the lady's girdle, and invariably in
])airs, has furnished a puzzle to antiquaries. Several pairs of
them were found in the Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Wilbraham,
in Cambridgeshire, in most cases attached together by a ring,
or small frame at the top. One of these is gi^^en in our next
cut, of the form which seems to have been most common. The
extremities of others were of the form represented by the figure
at the side. A number of other
^\ — ». \ examples found at Stowe Heath,
\ j) ill Suffolk; near Swaff'ham, in
' " Norfolk ; at Scaleby, near Cais-
tor, in Lincolnshire ; and at an
unascertained locality in Lei-
cestershire ; are given in the
second volume of Mr Eoach
Smith's ' Collectanea.' They
seem to be confined to the
x\nglian districts, and I am
not aware of any example
found in Kent ; but, curiously
enough, they are not uncom-
mon in the Prankish cemeteries
in "France. They have puz-
zled the few antiquaries, who
have observed them, extremely.
They were supposed at first to
be latch-keys, but their being
found in pairs and the thin-
ness of the metal (bronze)
seemed to militate against this
explanation, which was quite
exploded when other examples
were found with the ends perforated for small rings, and in some
y
V^
Articles from Wilbraham.
402 THE SAXOXS. [chap. xv.
the rings were still foun;l in the perforations. The most pro-
bable explanation seems now to be, that each pair either formed
the framework of a bag" or purse ; or that they belonged to a
frame, to which the various articles the lady carried by her side
wei'e attached. In some cases they are slightly ornamented.
Among other articles of the toilette, we must not forget to
mention comb«5, which have been found in several instances in
Anglo-Saxon graves. A double-toothed comb, of bone, with
I'ivets of iron, was found in an urn in the cemetery at Barrow
Furlong, in Northamptonshire ; and a single one. of the same
material, was found in a grave in Kent.
Eemains of various smaller articles are found scattered
about the Anglo-Saxon graves, many of which, made of perish-
able materials, are only indicated by decayed matter. Thus we
often trace the place once occupied by a small box, or coffei",
and find hinges, or clasps, or metal guards, which have belonged
to it. A very remarkable small bronze coffer, or box, was found
in the Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Stroud, in Kent. It was made
of two thin plates of bronze, riveted together, and bound round
at the lower part with a narrow band of the same metal ; on
one side was a ring, which appeared to have been intended for
hanging it to the girdle. It was stamped with Christian figures
and emblems, and was, doubtless, of foreign manufacture :
perhaps obtained in barter or in war, for the interment Avas
clearly a pagan one.* It is unnecessary to attempt an enu-
meration of all the small miscellaneous articles found in the
Anglo-Saxon graves. In one of those at Osengal, a pair of
compasses was found, and in another lay a pair of scales, the
scales of which were very neatly made of thin bronze ; along
with them were the weights, which were formed of Roman
coins, carefully adjusted by i-ubbing away the surface. It is
not unusual to find in the Anglo-Saxon graves in Kent, sea-
shells, and even snail-shells, and we sometimes meet with
cowries, which nuist have been brought from the East. These,
with the occurrence of Byzantine coins, and articles like the
coffer described above, show to what extent the early Anglo-
Saxon settlers held communication with foreign and even dis-
tant nations.
The larger portion of the pottery found in the Anglo-Saxon
* This very curious relic is engraved in Mr Roach Smith's ' Collec-
tanea Antiqua,' vol. ii, plate 36. A somewhat similar hox, ornanjented
with Christian subjects, has recently been found by Mr Ackerman in Qie
Saxon cemetery of Little Wittenham, Oxfordshire.
CHAP. XV.]
AXGLO- SAXON TOTTERY.
493
cT'-aves ill Kent, is Eoman, often cups and paterae, sometimes
in frag-nients, of the red Samian ware. Tlie pottery of Saxon
manufacture found in tliis country occurs chiefly in tlie cenip-
Anglo- Saxon Pottery.
teries wliere cremation was practised, that is, in JNIercia and
East Ang'lia, and consist of burial urns. These were long-
classed indiscriminately as British, and it is not till lately that
their distinctive cliaracteristics have been pointed out. The
cut given above presents five examples of Ang-lo-Saxon earth-
enware vessels. The two to the left, taken from a Saxon
cemetery at Kingston, near Derby, are the ordinary types of
burial urns found in interments of this period in England. They
are usually made with the hand, without the use of the lathe,
of a dark-coloured clay, and are not well baked ; their colour is
generally a dark brown, passing either to a black or to a dark
green tint. Their distinguishing characteristics are projecting
knobs or bosses at the sides, peculiar zigzag patterns, and a
still more usual ornamentation of circles or squares, which have
the appearance of having been stamped with the end of a notched
stick. The small unornamented vessel on the right was found
in the same cemetery, but without bones, and it was probably
a cup for domestic purposes: it exactly resembles one found
in a grave in Kent. The long-nocked amj)ulla in the middle
494
THE SAXONS.
[chap. XV.
was found in an Ang-lo-Saxon grave in Kent. Tlie vessel
at the bottom, to the right, from
the same cemetery at Kingston, was
also used as a burial urn. An Anglo-
Saxon burial urn, of a somewhat dif-
ferent pattern, but similar in general
character, is represented in the annexed
cut. It was found by Mr Bloxam, at
Chertersover, in Warwickshire, tilled
with ashes, and accompanied with an
iron sword, a spear-head, and other
articles, all undoubtedly Saxon. The
articles constantly found with the urns
of this class, leave no room for doubt
that they have been correctly appropriated to the early Saxon
settlers in our island ; and this appropriation is corroborated in a
very remarkable manner by discoveries made on the continent. In
1848, two German antiquaries, the brothers Lindenschmit, pub-
lished an account of the opening of an ancient Teutonic cemetery
of the pagan period, at Selzen, in Rhenish Hesse, the articles
found in which presented exactly the same character as those
in our Anglo-Saxon barrows. There w^as a similar mixture of
Anfflo- Saxon Urn.
^g9 Q & gi>& &
1^^) a) © S) ® ® ®
Germano- Saxon Pottery.
tliC two kinds of interment, but tlie practice of burying the
body entire seemed to prevail. The pottery was of precisely
the same character; it was similar in form, and was ornamented
CHAP. XV.]
GLASS DRINKING VESSELS.
49o
with tlie same bosses on the sides, and the same impressed
notches as in the Anglo-Saxon pottery described a1)ove. Yov
the sake of comparison, fonr examples of the pottery from
Selzen are given in the annexed cnt : the two to the left arc
cinerary nrns, like those found in Derbyshire.
TheAng-lo-Saxon glass, which is not uncommon, differs from
the Roman in being thinner, not so fine in texture, and more
subject to that kind of decomposition, which destroys its trans-
parency, and gives it a variegated tint. It is probable that tlie
Anglo-Saxon Drinking'-glasses.
Saxon glass-workers derived the art from their Roman pre-
decessors, and they certainly possessed very great skill, although
the form and ornament of their work differed entirely from
Eoman work. The glass vessels found in Anglo-Saxon graves
are generally drinking-cups, the forms of which will be best
understood by the cut above. When ornamented, they are
usually ribbed or striated. The forms were evidently derived
from the imitation of drinking-horns.* The examples given
in our cut were all taken from barrows in East Kent, and
were in the collections of Lord Londesborough and Mr Kolfe.
The ornamentation answers sufficiently well to the epithet of
* It will be observed that these drinking-- cups are so made that they
could not stand upright ; each guest was expected to drink his glass oti' at
a draught. It is said that this custom of making drinking-cups which
would not stand, in order to compel the drinkers to empty thein at once, was
the origin of the modern name of tttmblers, given to glasses which are not
now placed in the same predicament.
496
THE SAXO^iS.
[chap. XV.
twisted, which is applied in Ano-lo-Saxon poetry to drinkiiio;-
eiips. Thus in Beowulf (line 983), we are told that —
the thane observed his office,
he that in his hand bare
the twisted ale-cup.
The small cup-shaped glass vessel at the bottom of our cut is
also the type of a class of not uncommon occurrence in Kent.
A remarkable characteristic of the early Anglo-Saxon glass
Anglo-Saxon Glass Vessels.
manufacture is an ornamentation formed by separate threads of
glass twisted round the vessel after it had been formed ; and
sometimes of large knobs added to the glass, these latter
assuming very singular shapes. It is difficult to say how far
this kind of ornament was derived from the late Roman period,
but there is in the little museum at Lewes, in Sussex, a
glass ampulla, said to have been found among purely Roman
remains, which is ornamented with the same strings twisted
round the neck. I give, on this page, two examples of An»-lo-
Saxon glass vessels, with these singular ornamentations. The
one with knobs attached was found at Reculver, in Kent, and
is now preserved in the museum at Canterbury : it is about
six inches high, of a colour varying from olive green to yellow
(the variations perhaps caused by decomposition), the projections
being of a dark green — it is also ornamented with the strings
mentioned above. The other vessel represented in tlie cut was
found at Ash, in Kent, in 1849, and is in the collection of Mr
Rolfe ; it is a curious specimen of the application of the thread
ornament. Other examples of glass vessels, resembling the
CHAP. XV.]
DIIIXKIXG VESSELS.
407
first of these, with the projecting; claws, have been found 'm
(litterent parts of Saxon Eng-laiid. One is given in Mr Wylie's
account of the Fairford o-raves, in Gloucestershire, where it was
I'oLind. Another was found in a Saxon g-rave in liampshirc,
and a fourth at Coonibe, in East Kent. Another was found at
Castle Eden, in Durham, and was engraved in the fifteenth
volume of the Archseologia.
It is a very remarkable circumstance, and shows us the
necessity of comparing the antiquities of cognate races, that
one of these cups with the projecting claw^s, so similar to those
foiuid in England that w^e might suppose it bad come from the
same workshop, was found in a grave in the ancient cemetery j~
at Selzen, in Rhenish Hesse.* To show the close similarity \f
between the glass vessels found in the Selzen graves and those
of the Anglo-Saxons, which is the best evidence we could have
of their purely Teutonic chai'acter, I give in this page three
Gennauo- Saxon Drinking- Vessels.
(Irinking-glasses copied from the work of the brothers Lindcn-
schmit. One of the cup-shaped glasses, like those in our Anglo-
Saxon graves, with two earthenware jugs, also from Selzen, are
given in our cut on the next page. These two vessels are evi-
dently the original type of our modern pitcher. They are not
often found in Anglo-Saxon barrows, but exam})les have occur-
red, and others probably have been passed over unobserved. A
good specinu'u is preserved in the museum of Dover; it is said
to have been dug up in that neighbourhood. Mr Koach Smith
* Mr Roach Snutli has o-iven enpravings of this Selzen specimen, aloii.ir
wirh theditferent cxaniples found in England, in his • Collectanea Antiqua,'
vul. ii.
2 11
4«}S
THE SAXOXS.
[chap. XT.
extrarted frai>-nients of nnotlier from a barrow on tlie siuiniiit of
tiie liills beliind Folkestone.
Germano-Saxon Pottery and Glass.
Although there is no doubt much of purely Teutonic cliaractcr
iu tlie ornamentation of the pottery and glass, and of many of
the other articles manufactured by the Anglo-Saxons, it is pro-
bal)le tliat much of it also originated in attempts, more or less
rude, to imitate that which was seen on Homan woi'k. In some
of the jewellery we observe an evident design to inntate late
Koman and Byzantine ornaments, and perhaps if we compared
more closely the ornamental pottery, we should tind it was the
same. This is observable more
distinctly on the Prankish
])ottery, which differs some-
what in character from tliat
of the Anglo-Saxons. The
accompanying cut represents
a prevailing type of the Frank-
ish burial urns, which have ,'^^/^,!<^$x^cnn
often, however, much more f^^^@^^J^'^^
ornament. The ornament here '^^^^
is evidently a rude imitation
of that found on the lloman
red Samian wares ; it may be
i-ompared with that of some
late lloman pottery found in ,^ Fraukish TJru
Britain, of which we have al-
r;^ady given a cut at p. 279, ai;d also with the orn.iment of a
Itjuum altar given in p. 370. The comparison ot these ex-
CHAP. XV.]
ANGLO-SAXON POTTERY,
499
ainples shows how an elegant ornament, in passing through
successive imitations, degenerates into a very rude one.
There are two chisses of househokl utensils found frequently
in Anglo-Sax:on interments, which are worthy of particular notice.
Bowls of ])rouze, highly gilt, are met with in the cemeteries in
Kent, and generally so eleu'aut in form, that we can hardlv
Anglo-Saxon Bowls.
hesitate in looking upon them as the work of Roman manufac-
turers. Three examples of these bowls are given in our cut,
the first of which was found in a barrow at Wingham, in Kent ;
the lower example was found at Bourne Park, near C-anterbury;
and the one in the middle, on Barham Downs. They are of
different sizes, from five or six inches to thirteen in diameter.
Another article, found very frequently in Anglo-Saxon graves,
is a bucket, which generally retains
sufficient proofs of having been more
or less highly ornamented. These
buckets are found in Anglo-Saxon
cemeteries in all parts of England.
Many of them have been found at
different times in Kent, and traces
of others, which had been formed of
more perishal)le materials, have been
met with. One found in a grave in
Bourne Park, near Canterbury, had
been of rather large dimensions ; tlie
hoops only remained perfect, but
they were of bronze, and very eU?-
gantly formed ; the lower hoop was
a foct in diameter, the upper hoo})
Bucket, from Bourne Park.
iOO
THE SAXONS.
fciIAP, XV.
ten inches, and the wliole heig'lit of the bucket appeared to
lir.ve been about a foot. The lioops are represented in the
annexed cut as they must have stood on tlie wood, whicli had
pcrislied ; the liooked feet of the lower bronze hoop appear to
luive been intended to turn over the woodwork and hold it
Hrni. The l)ucket on the rig'ht, in our uext cut, was found in
a liTHve on the Chatham lines, and is engraved in T)ou<>;las's
Anglo- Saxon Buckets.
' Nenia.' It was made of iron and brass, and was, tlierefore,
l)ettcr preserved. This bucket was only seven and a half
inches in heig'ht, by eight inches in diameter. Buckets found
in the East- Anglian cemeteries are often of still smaller dimen-
sions. Several were found by Lord Braybrooke, at Wilbndiam, in
(/andjrido-eshire. The bucket on the left in the last cut was
found in a barrow near Marlborough, in AViltshire, opened by
Bucket from Fairfurd.
Sir Richard Colt Iloare, who erroneously supposed ii ic be
CHAP. XV.] ANGLO-SAXON BUCKETS. oOl
llomau. The in(;tal hoops, in this case, were embossed or
stamped with figures of animals. Our last cut on the preceding
page represents one of these bucket-formed vessels found in a
grave at Fairford, in Gloucestershire, formed as nsual of wood,
with brass lioops, and ornaments; it was ouly four inches in
diameter, and between three and four inches high. These buckets
are, as far as I have observed, always found in the graves of num,
and they were evidently vessels which served for something moi'(^
than ignoble purposes. The only explanation 1 can suggest is,
that they were for containing the ale, mead, or wine, which
was to be served in the Saxon hall. Tliey are probably the
vessels {vats) alluded to in the words of the poem of Beowulf,
which describes how
ciip-bcarers ^ave
the wiiio from wondrous vats.
Beowidf, line 231G.
The Anglo-Saxon translation of the book of Judges (vii. 20),
rendered lujdnas coufregisseid, by ' to-brsecon ]7a bucas,' they /
broke the buckets. A common name for this vessel, which ^
Avas probably called buc, was cescen, signifying literally a vessel
made of ash, the favourite wood of the Anglo-Saxons.
Roman coins are not unfrequently found in Anglo-Saxon
graves, and in some instances a single coin has been found, as
though the deceased, or his relatives, had retained some of the
older Roman customs. A few later Byzantine, and also Frankish,
coins have been found, but they are much rarer than the
Roman coins, which, uo doubt, continued in circulation under
the Saxons.* The earlier history of the Anglo-Saxon coimige
is very obscure. On many Roman sites, especially such as are
known to have been occupied down to a late period, are found
very small coins in brass, which appear, from their rude cha-
racter and imperfect design, to have been late imitations of the
Roman coins of the size denominated third brass. These coins,
from their diminutive size, are termed by luunismatists ui'uumi,
and are supposed to have been struck during the period be-
tw(!en the abandonment of the island by the imperial govern-
ment, and the establishment of the Saxon kingdoms. It is
vei-y probable that these coins began to be struck very soon
after the imperial authority was extinct, and they are of his-
* It is by no means imcominon to find coins, especially of gold, both
Roman, Byzantine, and Merovingian, witli loop.s attached to them, for the
I'urpose ot svispension as ornaments. It was a custom which prevailed
among the Koniaus themselves.
r)02
THE SAXONS.
fCHAP. XV,
torical interest, because tliey seein to show tlie continued ex-
istence of the municipal g-overniuent in the town. Tliese so-
called vilniml are not always of the diminutive size which irave
rise to their name, as we find tliem sometimes as large, or
nearly, as the small copper coin of the mintage of the emperors
of the Constantine familv,
which seem in most cases
to have been the types from
which they wcrtt rudely
copied. I give two exani-
])les from coins recently
found at AVroxeter ( Urico-
iiliuu). On this site, two
instances have already been
met Avith in which, at the
time the ancient city was
destroyed, individuals have ^J^inimi, iromWroxetcv [Uricoiiium).
dropped the money with
which they were attempting to make their escape, leaving ^is
curious evidence of the class of money which was at that
moment in circulation. The first of these individuals was an
old man, whose skeleton was found where he had sought to
conceal himself in one of the hypocausts of the public baths,
and he may have been the money-taker in that establishment,
for liis treasure consisted almost entirely of coins of small
value. They were :
Tetricus (much worn)
. 1
The type urbs koma . . . . 24
Claudius Gothicus
1
That of COXSTANTINOFOLIS . . 31
Constantine the Elder
. 13
Valens (much worn) . . . . 1
Constans
. 1
llude copies of llomau coins, or
Constantine IT.
. 36
minDni . . . . . . G
Constantius II.
o
Illegible G
Julian (a plated denarius)
. 1
Helena . .
2
Total 132
Theodora
. 1
The second bundle of coins alluded to, appeared to have
Ix^longed to some one who was making his escape from what is
supposed to have been an enameller's workshop, and consisted
of the followino- coins : —
C'aracalla (a silver denarius) . .
1
Salonina (copper,
washed
with
Severus Alexander (a plated de-
silver) . .
1
narius) . .
1
Postunius
1
Maximus (second brass)
1
Victorinus
. .
, .
8
(tallienus
2
Tetricus . .
3
,:i!Ar. XV. i EARLY AXGLO-SAXOX COIXS. 503
Claudius Gotliicus . . . . 2
Carausius . . . . . . 1
The Constantine family . . 12
Valentiniaa . . . . . . 1
Gratian . . . . . . . . 1
A minimus . . . . . . 1
Illegible . . . . . . . . 2
Total ;5S
The m'utlnins foinul in this second lot is tlie lower coin of t1i(^
two engraved on the preceding page. All tliese coins, which arc
not otherwise described, are small copper; and Ave cannot bnt
remark how large a proportion are those of tlie Constantine family.
The very small comparative number of miuimi found in circula-
tion in so important a town, would seem to show that this coinage
was quite recent when Uriconium was destroyed. On the site
of some other Roman tow^ns, which had continued to exist
through the period between the Romans and the Saxons, they
are found in pi'oportionally greater numbers. In London a
large cpiantity of these have been found; and Mr Roach Smith
enumerates among the coins found of late years at Richborough
{Riiti^plfp), no less than two hundred of these iiwilmi, which
show that that post continued to be occupied as a place of
importance during the period just mentioned. These coins
were followed by a different coinage, which was undoubtedly
Saxon, but whicli nlso was imitated from that of the Romans,
and it is not improbable that the old minting establishmerits
continued to exist. These early Saxon coins, for the classifica-
tion of which very little has yet been done, are called scmttas.'^
it is remarkable, that while the Roman riiudiiiL are all in brass,
the sceattas are invariably in silver. The devices may generally
be traced to he rude imitations of Roman types, especially of
the coinage of Constantine and his family, which are found in
great abundance in this country. Of the two examples given
in our cut, the upper has on one side a copy of a very common
reverse of tlie coins of the Constantine period, which are
usually classed under the head of nrbs Roma, representing Ro-
mulus and Remus suckled by the wolf. The second lias a
head on one side, aiul on the other, a device which is pro-
bably copied from the altar which occurs on the coins of the
Constantine family. Many are copied from the coins of
Arcadius, Honorius, and others of that period. The sccatfa-s
* The sfoattds were the common coins of the Anglo-Saxons at an early
period; and the name was often used as a general term for money. 'J'he
wt)rd, in the singular, is seeat or scfct, and to pay your sceat, was literally
to pay your reckoning. This has been by course of time corrupted into the
modern ale-house phrase of pnywcj your shot.
5C4
THE SAXOXS.
[chap, XV,
liave been foiiiul at Eicliboroug-li, lleculver, and other places
in East Kent, in considerable nnui-
bers, as well as in tlie north of Eno:-
land. They are met with occasionnlly
in the pairan Anulo-Saxon barrows or
<>'raves, which fixes the period to
which they belong*. The monlder-
ing" remains of what appeared to
liave been a small purse, with four
.sreattas of silver, were found by the
side of a skeleton in a barrow on Anglo-Saxon Sceattas from
tiie Breach Downs, in Kent. Richborouiih.
;HAr. xvi.i AXGLO-SAXOX SETTLEMENT. oC:
CtlAf J'^.R A N 1.
Anglo-Saxon ©erclcinent — Division ot the Land — Population of the Countr/
and of the Towns — Continuance of the Roman Municipalities — Traces
of Municipal Privileges in the Anglo-Saxon Towns ; Canterbury,
Rochester, Dover, Exeter, London.
The remains of our Anglo-Saxon Ibrefatliers, as described in
tlie precedino; chapter, present sufficient evidence that society
then consisted of two very distinct elements : one purely Teu-
tonic, the other derived from intercourse with the Konian popu-
lation. The Teutonic settlers took possession of the land, which
the various chiefs divided anioni;- themselves by lot ; and it
was held by a totally different tenure to that which existed
under the imperial g-overiiment. The characteristic of Teutonic
society Avas a deeply implanted aristocracy, that of the heads of
clans, or tribes, and there was very little tendency to the central-
isation which was exhibited in the Roman imperial constitution.
Each chief received his share of land, on which he settled with
his household and followers, and which descended in his family
as a freehold. We still trace these orig-inal allotments of land
in the names of places in every part of En>>lan(l, which are com-
posed of the patronymic of the family or race. Thus, when we
find such a name as Birmingham, we may be sure that it was
originally the ham, or residence, of the Beormingas, the descend-
ants or clan of ]3eorm, for this was the regular form of the Teu-
tonic patronymic — Bt'ODidiig, the son of Beorm. And thus we
hav6"]^adlinghamin Canibrid<>:eshire, the seat of the Bsedliniras ;
J-Juckingham, of the Bueingas ; Warmingham, in Cheshire, of
the Wearmingas ; Littlington, the tun or head residence of the
Lytlingas ; Elvington, the seat of the Elfingas ; Killinghall,
the hall of the Cylingas ; and a vast number of similar names.
The family or clan did not always take its name from the chief
who obtained the allotment of land ; it was often but a branch
of a much older family in the land from which the settler canif.
606 THE SAXOXS. Tchap. xvi.
Hence we find tlie same patronvinics in distant parts of Eng'land,
A\ liieli would seein to indicate that ditt'ereut members ol' the same
orig-inal family had joined in various separate expeditions to
l^ritain ; and it is still more curious that this identity of name
is found in districts peopled severally by the ditierent races,
Angles, or Saxons, or Jutes. This admits of two explanations :
it shows the close relationship between the three races them-
selves ; and it proves, probably, that when a great chieftain of
one. race, an Angle, for instance, planned an expedition to
Britain, subordinate leadei's from the other races, Saxons,
Jutes, or others, were ready to enlist among his followers.
Thus we find the Billingas at Billingham, in D'lvham ; at Bil-
lingley, in Yorkshire; at Billinghay, in Lincolnshire: at Bil-
lington, in the counties of Bedford, Statt'ord, and Lancaster ;
as well as at other places, all within the districts occupied by
the Angles. We find a settlement of the same family at Bil-
lingshurst, in Sussex ; and some of them appear to have estab-
Jished themselves in the outskirts of London, and to have
given their name to Billingsgate. The Bosingas are found at
J^ossingham, in Kent, and again at the two Bossingtons, in
Ham])shire and Somerset. The Scearingas are found at Shar-
ringtou, Sheringford, and Sharringham, in Norfolk ; at Sheer-
ing, in Essex ; at Scarrington, in Nottinghamshire ; and at
Sherrington, in Buckingham, and in AViltshire. AYe have the
Haningas at three places named Hannington, in Northampton-
shire, Hampshire, and Wiltshire, and also probably at Han-
uingfield, in Essex. When Ave examine further we find, among
these patronymics, names which belong to the great families
Avhose history is mixed up in the earliest Teutonic mythology.
The Wselsings, who are found at Walsingham, in Norfolk, at
Walsingham, in Durham,, and at Woolsington, in Northum-
berland, appear to have been offsets of the great family of the
Yolsungar of the Edda, the Volsungen of the old German ro-
mances. The Harlings (Herelingas), who are found at three
places named Harlington, in Middlesex, Bedfordshire, and
Yorkshire, as well as at Hai'ling, in Norfolk, are also connected
with the ancient Teutonic mYtholo"T, and their name is found
at Harlingen, in Eriesland. The Swasfas, a tribe who are
known to have dwelt on the borders of the Angles, on the con-
tinent, appear to have given their najne to Swatfham, in Nor-
folk. Mr Kemble, quoting other well-known names from the
iHvthic and half-mythic history of the continental Teutons,
points out, as further instances, that the Brentings of northern
ciixw XVI.] THE ANGLO-SAXON SETTLEMENT. o07
romance arc foiiiul in England, at P)rentino;ley, in Leicester-
shire, and at Brantinghani, in Yorkshire. The Scylding's, and
Scylfing-s, celebrated Northern races, gave their names to Skel-
ding, and to two places named Skillington, in Northnmherhind
and Dorset; the Ardings, wlio are found at Ardington, in
Berkshire, and at Ardingly, in Sussex, are, he says, the
Azdingi, the royal race of the Visigoths and Vandals ; and the
Banings of the continent, over whom, when the curious Anglo-
Saxon fragment called the Traveller's Song- was written, a
prince named Becca ruled, are recognised in Banningham, in
Norfolk. The Helsings gave nam3 to Helsington, in West-
moreland, and to Helsingland, in Sweden; and we find the
name of the Bleccingas as well in Bleckingen, in Sweden, as in
Bletchington, in Oxfordshire, and Bletchingley, in Snri-ey. In
the Gytingas, found at Guyting-, in Gloucestershire, we perhaps
trace the Jutungi of Germany ; and another Alamannic tribe,
the Scuding-i, are supposed to be traced in the Scytiugs, who
gave their name to Shuttington, in Warwickshire. In these
instances, conjecture is, perhaps, carried too far, as well as in
the supposition that the Wasrings, wdio left their name in two
Warringtons, in Lancashire and Buckinghamshire, and to the
same number of Werringtons in Northamptonshire and Devon,
belonged to the same race as the Varangians (Vajrinjar), so
celebrated in ])yzantine history ; but there can be no doubt
that the carefvJ study of the xVnglo-Saxon names of localities is
calculated to throw a light upon the history and condition of
the first settlers which we can hope to derive from no other
source.* Many of these names point directly to the state of
the country itself, at the time the Teutonic population came in,
and we can have no doubt that then the site of Beverley was a
plain so unfrequented by man, that it was occupied only by
beavers, or that places with names compounded of those of
wolves, boars, &c., were the usual resorts of wild beasts.
The Teutonic settlers established themselves chiefly in the
country, where they retained all their old national feelings.
\\e know that they Avere averse to living- in towns, and, from
a superstitious feeling which led (hem to believe that the houses
budt by other peoples might be rendered dangerous for them
by means of charms and magic, they preferred the houses
nhich they built for ^hemselves. ^Moreover, the country villas
* Extensive materials on this interesting subject have been oollootetl liv
Mr Keiiible in t.ie tir^^t voluuic uf his ' Saxun iu Enu-land.'
o08 THE SAXONS. [chap. xvi.
of the llomaiis, and the smaller and unfortified towns, liad
Ijeeii mostly burnt or overthrown, and their plan and construc-
tion were not tliose to which the Saxons were accustomed.
However, we do meet with instances of E,oman villas occupied
and altered by the Anglo-Saxon settlers, and in some instances
we find that the residence of the Saxon chief did occupy a
lloman site. This was the case with the two seats of the
Iclings ; Icklingham, in Suffolk, and Tckleton, or Icklini>-ton,
in Cambridgesiiire, in both which places have been found
extensive traces of lloman settlement. One of them is sup-
posed to occupy the site of the lloman station of Iciani, and
it is not quite impossible that the Saxon name in this case may
liave arisen from mistaking- the Roman n.ame for a patronymic.
Tlie Anglo-Saxon landholders held a position totally different
IVom that of the Komans ; they were lords over their own
allotment of soil and its population, and the principle of cen-
tralisation existed so little amongst them, tliat, rather than
look up to a superior head for justice, the laiullords formed
associations among themselves, to manage their own affairs,
and administer justice in their mutual transactions. Such
mutual associations formed the groundwork of the subsequent
division of the country into hundreds, shires, &c. Each land-
holder, nevertheless, acknowledged a certain dependence upon,
or subjection to, the chief under whom he had come into the
island, and the latter assumed the title of king over his chief-
tains and their people. These kings were soon tempted by the
splendour of the old Roman rule, and they tried to establish
and increase their authority by imitating Roman forms, and
adopting, as far as they could, the Roman principles of admin-
istration. Tiiey were wealthy, by the, extensive landed estates
wliich they had reserved to themselves in the division of lands,
and by the possession of the old Roman towns, "which fell to
their share ; and they had a natural influence over the oilier
chi(>fs Aviio had followed their banner from the first, because
they belonged to the great families of supposed divine blood,
who alone commanded that sort of confidence and respect which
was necessary to insure obedience. .
Tlie population of the country consisted of two elements —
the chiefs and their followers, who had obtained possession and
lordship of the lands, and the agriculturists and labourers, Avho
were in the position of serfs and bondmen, and comprised
chiefly the old Romano-Rri^ish population, which under the
Saxons was probably quite as well off as under the Romans.
CHAP. XVI.] THE ANGLO-SAXOX LANDHOLDEUS. 509
The Saxous thus held the country, while the Uomau citizens
continued to liold the towns as tributaries of the Saxon kinj>-s,
within whose bounds tliey stood. The country tlnis exhibited
Teutonic rudeness, while the towns were the representatives of
Koman civilisation, and tlioug'h the intercourse between tlie
two, and the fjradual infusion of Saxon blood into the towns,
laid the foundation of modern society, there was a feelin<>- of
hostility and rivalry between town and country, which has
hardly yet disappeared. Between the aristocratic feeling* of
the Saxon landholders, and the republican principles that
existed in the towns, arose, under the balancing inlluence ot
the crown, the modern political constitution.
We can understand best the mode and forms in which the.
Anglo-Saxons established themselves here, by comparing them
with what took place, under simihar circumstances, in other
parts of Europe, where our historical accounts are more detailed
and precise. There, also, the barbarian settlers seized upon the
lands, while the cities were generally left in the hands of the
old citizens. On a former occasion [ have described briefly the
internal constitution of the Romaii towns, with their cnriahs,
or senators, and their various numicipal officers, which we
know were all preserved after the Teutonic conquests in the
cities in Gaul and the other Roman provinces on the continent,
and which were, no doubt, also ])reserved in Britain.* h\
Italy, where, in the mixture, the spirit of the Roman institu-
tions prevailed most over the barbarian population, the cities,
relieved from the imperial power to which they had been pre-
viously subjected, became in the middle ages powerful repub-
lics, and the curia was the prototype of those bodies of
patrician princes, whose personal feuds led in the end to their
subversion. In other parts of Europe, amid the general
w^reck, some powerful commercial cities retained a complete
independence, and became known as free cities, and some ot
them have continued so to the present day. In France, M.
Haynouard has traced the existence of the municipal officers
by their original titles, even the defensor clvitatls, during
several centuries after the fall of the Eoi^ian power. We have
unfortunately few documents which throw any light on the
condition of the towns in England during the Saxon period of
our history; but we catniot help recognising in the Roman
* The following- remarks were first, published in .a paper coniniuiiicatc 1
to the Society of Auticiuurios, and printed in the thirty-second vuluine ol
the Arch;eolo"ia.
■^10 THE SAXOXS. [CHAP. xvi.
rinia tlie ori<>-iu of the elective body in our medieval towns,
the probl honiuies or hoiil hoinbies of the older records, the
l)iir<2,-esses, who, like the cnrlales or senators, obtained their
rank by birth or election. The dniimmn answered to the two
bolUvl or bailiffs, or as the Saxons called i\\Qm,p)YpfectloY reeves,
Avho were the chief ma^'istrates in most of our medieval borondis.
1 he pniiapaJes were the .scab'uii {JiclteoinH) of the continental
towns, in Eng-land o^enerally known by the Saxon name of
ahk^rmen. We might g-o on to enumerate other minor points
of resemblance betw^een the constitutions of the munic'ipiuui
and of the medieval borough at the time when we become
fully acquainted with the domestic affairs of the latter ; but I
will only now point out a few circumstances which tend to
thVow a light upon the condition of these boroughs under the
Anglo-Saxons, when they have commonly been supposed by
legal wiiters to have had no corporate existence.
It strikes us at the first glance, that the few historical facts
relating to the condition of our towns during the Saxon period,
preserved by the older annalists, exhibit them in a state of
importance and independence, wdiich they could hardly have
reached, had it not been derived from municipal constitutions
already existing when the Saxons settled in this country, and
which is observed most distinctly in those places which are
known to have occupied the sites of the more powerful Roman
towns.* All traditions (for our history of the first Saxon
invasion is nothing more than tradition, and that very vague)
represent East Kent as having been occupied by the Saxons
under a pacific arrangement, when they took Durovernura, or
Canterbury, as their capital. Recent discoveries show that the
Saxons not only continued to inter their dead on the site of
the Roman burial-places around the ancient city, down to the
time of their conversion, but that they afterwards erected
^Christian churches on the same spots ; one of the strongest
proofs we could have of the gradual change from Roman to
Saxon in that city. We find Canterbury at an early period
■governed by a prefect, or reeve, who gives land to the monks ;
and in a later charter confirming his grant, dated in 805, there
is a remarkable distinction between the villa or town, and the
ciintas or corporate body, such as we might naturally expect
* It may be observed that the destruction of Roman towns is rarely
"mentioned in our earlier historians. The Saxons Chronicle speaks of the
destruction of Audredesceaster in 491 as though it were a remarkable
occurrence.
CHAP. XVI.] ROCHESTER AND DOYEIl. 511
ill the transiiiissiou of tlie Uouian principle to the Saxon
people.*
Rocliester (^llrofes.-ede)') derived its Saxon name, accordini;-
to Bede, from one of its eai'lv riders or prefects named Hrof,
wlio, for some circnmstance or other, had probably g-ained
irreater notoriety than most persons of his class and rank.f
In the reign of king Ethelred (in the latter half of the tenth
centnry), on account of some dissensions Avith the bishop, the
king" besieged tiiis city witli an army, but, being unable to take
it, he in revenge Hid waste the surrounding and dependent
district.:]: We here find the body corporate of the city taking
part Avith its bishop, engaged in open war with the king, ami-
successfully resisting him. The anger of the king is said to
have been finally appeased by a sum of money given by the
archbishop of Canterbury (Dnnstan).
Dover occupies the site of the Roman Dnbra?. It is not
often mentioned by our earlier historians, because Ricliborough
{Tlutnpiai) was the more usual port in landing from Prance ;
but an incident occurred in the reign of Edward the Confessor
which throws some light on the position of its municipal body.
In 1048, Eustache count of Boulogne, Edward's brother-in-
law, visited the king at Gloucester, where he was then holding
his court. On liis return, when at a short distance from
Dover, Eustache and his men put on their armour, and, enter-
ing the toAvn in a rude manner, they proceeded to take forcible
possession of the lodgings which pleased them best.§ This
Avas a right which the feudal barons of the continent claimed
under the title of the droit tie gite, and which was ex-
pressly provided against in the English municipal charters
subsequent to the Conquest. One of Eustache's men went to
the dwelling of a townsman, and Avounded the householder,
* Hnnc pfienoniinatani terrain quidam homo bonus nomine Aldliun, qui
in liac rei^ali villa inlustris civitatia pra3t'ectus fuit, pro intuitu interna;
nieivodis t'ratribus nostris ad mensam tradidit. Kemble's Codex Dii)b)iiia-
ticus Anglo-Saxonum, vol. i. p. 231.
t Quam gens Anfi,lorum a primario quondam illius, qui dicebatur Ilrof,
Hroi'cscestir cognonunat. Bede, Hist. Ecel. lib. ii. c. 3. In another ])lacc,
lib. ii. 0. 6, Bede calls the city, in Latin, civitas llrofi.
X Osborn's Life ot Dunstan, in the Act. SS. Benedict. Sonc. Y. p. G83.
W. Malmsb. de Ge.st. Keg. p. Go. (Ed. Savile.)
§ \>;\. hi l>ider coinon, ])a woldon hi innian lii \nx}X heoni sylfan ge-licode.
Sax. Chron. From the circumstance oi' their arming before they cjuae to
ilie town, we might be led to suspect that h]ustache and his men had had
a ijrevious dispute with the townsuieu of Dover on this subject, perhaps
when they first came to England. ^
.512 THE SAXOXS. [chap. xvr.
Ix'cause lie refiiseJ to admit liim. The latter seized liis own
weapon and slew the intruder. 'Then,' to use tlie Avords of
the contemporary Saxon chronicler, ' Eustache got upon his
horse, and his companions upon theirs, and they went to the
householder and slew him within his own dwelling; and then
went up towards the burgh, and slew, as well within as with-
out, more than twenty men. And the townsmen slew nineteen
of the count's men, and wounded they knew not how many,
and Eustaehe escaped with only a few companions.' Eustache
returned to the king, gave a partial account of the affair, and
made him so 'wroth with the townsmen,' that he ordered
Godwin, in whose earhlom of Kent the occurrence had taken
place, to proceed with an army against the men of Dover.
But earl Godwin, knowing that Eustache ]iad begun the quarrel,
espoused the cause of the townsmen, and an irruption of tlie
Welsh seems to have turned the king's attention in another
direction. Eonr years after this, in 1052, count Eustache
again visited king Edward, and on his landing at Dover the old
feud was renewed. ' Then,' says the chronicler, ' went his
men inconsiderately after lodgings, and slew a certain man of
the town, and then another, until seven lay slain. And much
harm was then done on both sides, both with horse and witii
Aveapons, until the people gathered together, and then Eustache's
men tied aAvay till they came to the king at Gloucester.' On
this second occasion, Godwin more openly took part with the
townsmen of Dover, and, raising a considerable army, marched
towards the king, and demanded that count Eustache and his men
should be delivered into his hands. We have here a town
virtually claiming a very important municipal right, and defend-
ing it by force ; Avhile the king proceeds, not judicially against
the indivi(Uials who had offended, but against the whole cor-
porate body, as though it were an independent state.* ^^ e
learn, also, from the Domesday Survey, that in this same reign,
the burgesses of Dover had purchased certain immunities of the
king, for the con(Htion of serving him with twenty ships foi"
fifteen days in the year f
* The above version of tlie story is taken from the Saxon Chronicle as
printed in the text and in the notes of the Collection of Historians edited
by order of the Record Commission, which appears to be the best authority.
The subsequent historians have confounded the two riots, and made only
one. See Florence of Worcester, sub an. 1051 ; W. Malnisb. de Gest. Key-
p. 81. &c.
+ Burg-enses dederunt xx. naves regi una vice in anno ad xv. dies ; et in
nnaquaque navi trant homines xx. et unus. Hoc faciebant pro eo quo!
eis perdonaverat sacani et sucam.
I
criAr. xvT.] INDEPENDENCE OF THE TOWNSMEN. 513
We liave another instance of municipal responsibility in the
case of Thetford, in Norfolk. In 952, the people of that town
were engaj^ed in hostilities with the monks (probably in defence
of some of their privilef>-es), in the conrse of which they slew
their abbot Eadhelm. King Edred appears to have taken no
steps to discover the persons immediately concerned in this act
of violence, but he sent an army, and caused ' a great slaughter '
to be made of the townsmen.*
In 1040, king Hardacnut imposed a very heavy tribute on
his English subjects. Two of the king's kmcarles were sent to
enforce its payment by the citizens of Worcester, who rose
against them, and slew them in the cathedral. The king, in
revenge, sent an army to ravage the neighbourhood and destroy
the city, but the inhabitants had taken shelter, with their
most valuable effects, in an island in the river Severn, and
there they set their persecutors at defiance. f We here find a
town asserting its right to exemption from extraordinary taxa-
tion ; another of the municipal privileges guaranteed by the
charters of a later period.
The city of Exeter affords a remarkable instance of the
manner in which the Roman municipal institutions w^re pn--
served. In other towns the Romano-British population gradu-
ally disappeared ; but we learn, from William of Malmsbury,
that, down, to the reign of Ethelstan, Exeter was inhabited by
English and Welsh, who lived on an equality of rights (jEquo
jiireX), which they could only have done by virtue of an
original composition with the Saxon conquerors. It may be
cited as a proof of the correctness of this view of the mode in
which the Roman corporations outlived the shock of invasion,
and thus became a chief instrument iu the civilisation of s\d)se-
(juent ages, that even the Danes, in their predatory excursions,
often entered into similar compositions with the Saxon towns,
as with Canterbury, in 1009. It may be added, that there is
no greater evidence of the independence and strength of the
towns under the Saxons, than the circumstance that, while the
king and his earls, with the forces of the counties, were not
able to make a successful stand against the Danish invaders, it
frequently happened that a town singly drove a powerful army
* Saxon Chron. sub an.
t Saxon Chron. Florence of Worcester.
4^ Illos [Cornewallensesl (pioquo iinpi<ire adorsus, ab Excestria. qiiani ;i(l
id loiiiporis aiquo cum Anf;lis jure inhabitarant, cedere oonipulit. — W.
ISlalin.sb. do Gost. Ilej^-. p. 50.
2 I
•5U THE SAXONS. [chap. xvr.
from its gates, and the townsmen sometimes issuad forth aud
defeated the enemy in a pitched battle. The Saxon Clironicle
furnishes many examples. In 855, the townsmen of Rochester
made a brave defence against the Danes, till they were relieved
by Alfred. The iidiabitants of Exeter opposed the invaders
with success on several occasions ; the townsmen (bnrgvvare)
beat them in battle in 895. In 918, the men of Hereford and
Gloucester went out, and defeated the Danes in a pitched battle.
In 921, the Danes wer^^ beaten by the men of Bedford, and
also by the inhabitants of Maldon in Essex. In 1001, the
people of Exmonth drove away tlie Danisli army which came
to attack that town. When the Saxons began to obtain the
ascendancy by the abilities of the family of Alfred, we find the
towns revolting from the Danes in a manner which can hardly
leave a doitht of their acting as free corporate bodies. The
Saxon Chronicle, under the year 918, speaking of Ethelfleda,
tells us, ' in the early part of this year, by God's help, she
got into her power, by treaty, the burgh of Leicester, and the
greater part of the army which owed obedience thereto {pe
]?aer-to hyrde) became subject to her; and the people of Tork
(Eforwicingas) had also covenanted with her, some having given
a pledge, and some having bound themselves by oath, that they
would be at her command.' And again, in the same year,
' Thurcytel the eorl sought king Edward to be his lord, and
all the lioldas and almost all the chief men who owed obedience
to Bedford, and also many of those who owed obedience to
Northampton.' In the year following, 'those who owe obe-
dience to Bedford' are called <i'/;^ry^^(2r«^, burgesses. In 921,
' the army which owed obedience to Cambridge ' chose king
EdAvard to be their lord.
We can trace the power and independence of the citizens of
London from the earliest period of our annals. We have no
reason for believing that this city, which was a powerfid com-
nun'cial port, was ever taken and ravaged by the Saxon in-
vaders. It appears to have afforded a shelter to the people of
West Kent, when that district was overrun by the Saxons in
their first inroads.* At the end of the sixth century, London
was considered as the capital of the East-Saxons, although
Ethelbert, king of Kent, appointed Mellitus to the bishopric,
and built there for him the church of St Paul.f At that
* See the Saxon Cliron. sub an. 457.
t Bade, Hist. Eccl. lib. ii. c. o.
ci-iAr. XVI.] LONDON. 515
])eriod it was still a rich trading- town,* and it appears to liave
experienced no clieck to its prosperity. After the relapse of
the East-Saxons to idolatry, tiie Londoners i-efused to receive
back their bishop, and neither the king- of Kent, nor the two
l^]ast-Saxon kings, had power to force him upon theni.f About
the year 635, AVini boiig-ht of Wulfhere, king- of the Mercians,
the see of the city of London, and i-emained bishop thereof till
his death. At a subsequent period, archbishop Theodore
appointed bishops of the East-Saxons ' in the city of London,'
and Essex has been ever since included in the diocese. In 679,
we hear of Friesland merchants in London, and it appears to
have been then a great mart of slaves. :{: A comparison of these
ditferent circumstances gives us some grounds for believing-
that, although nominally the metropolis of the kings of the
East-Saxons, London was in the fullest sense of the word a
free-trading- town, neutral to a certain degree between the
kingdoms around, although each king- exercised a greater or
less degree of influence over it according- as he was more or less
powerful than his neighbours, and perhaps each had his officers
there to look after the interests of his own subjects. This
would explain in some deg-ree an obscure law of the Kentish
kings, Hlothhere and Edric (673 — 685), made at a time when
we should expect London to have been under the power of the
kings of Mercia : — ' If any Kentish- man buy a chattel in Lun-
den-wic, let him then have two or three true men to witness,
or the king's wlc-reeva. If it be afterwards claimed of the man
in Kent, let him then vouch the man who sold it him to Avar-
ranty, in the 2olc (town) at the king's hall, if he know him and
can bring- him to the warranty : if he cannot do that, let him
prove at the altar, with one of his witnesses, or with the king's
wic-reeve, that he bought the chattel openly in the zvic, with his
own money, and then let him be paid its worth : but if he
cannot prove that by lawful averment, let him give it up, and
let the owner take possession of it.'§ The king's wie-reece
appears to have been an officer of the king of Kent who exer-
cised a jurisdiction over the Kentish men trading wit]i or at
London, or who was appointed to watch over their interests.
* Et ipsa niultorum emporium popiilorum terra marique venientium.
Becle, ib.
t Bedo, Hist. Eccl. lib. ii. c. 4.
X Bede, Hi«r. Eccl. lib. iii. c. 7, and lib. iv. cc 6, 12, 22.
§ Thorpe's Anj^lo- Saxon Laws, j\ 14. Some aiitiquaiies have supposed-
very erroneously, that Landcn-ivic is here another name for Sandwich.
516 THE SAXONS. [chap. xvr.
AVhen the different Saxon king-doms became consolidated into
one, the influence of the sole monarch over the metropohs
would be of course greatly increased, but we still meet with
remarkable proofs of its power and independence. Ethelstan
was one of the most powerful of the Anglo-Saxon monarchs of
England; yet under his reign, soon after the year 900, we And
' the bishop and reeves, who belong to London,' making in
the name of the citizens laws, which were confirmed by the
king (because they had reference to the whole kingdom), and are
preserved in the Anglo-Saxon code. These laws prove that the
body corporate of the city of London exercised an independent
jurisdiction in matters which concerned themselves far beyond
the limits of their own territory, and tlie necessity of making
this power known tliroughout the kingdom was the cause that
their laws on this subject were entered among the public laws of
t]ie land, which circumstance has led to tlieir preservation,
while every document relating to the internal government of
the city at this early period has perished. These laws relate
chiefly to robberies committed by strangers, to whicji a large
commercial city was naturally exposed, and against which it
could provide itself with no redress unless it could pursue the
offenders to a distance. One of the clauses provides, ' if it then
should happen that any kin be so strong and so great, within
land or without land, whether twelve-hynde or two-hyude, that
tliey refuse us our right, and stand up in defence of a thief, that
we all of us ride thereto with the reeve within whose district
{manicng) it may be ; and also send on both sides to the reeves,
and desire from them aid of so many men as may seem to us
adequate for so great a suit, that there may be the more fear
in those culpable men for our assemblage, and that we all ride
thereto, and avenge our wrong, and slay the thief, and those
who fight and stand with him, unless they be willing to depart
from liim.' * The power of making a law like this, implies
something like an understood agreement or treaty between a
free commercial city and the states which surround it, whereby
those states are allowed commercial privileges on, condition of
giving the citizens the right of pursuing offenders through their
territories ; and it agrees perfectly with the interpretation given
to the earlier law of the kings of Kent.
This also explains to us why, at a very early period after the
Norman Conquest, the privileges of the city of London are
* Judicia civitatis Lundoniae, viii. § 2, 3. Thorpe, p. 100.
I
cuAP. XVI.] LONDON. 517
excepted and protected in charters given to corporate towns in
far distant parts of the kingdom. In a dispute with the abbot
of Bury, in the twelfth century, the citizens of London, so far
from admitting (as Brady supposed) that their privileges wer(;
newly acquired from their Norman sovereigns, professed to
have enjoyed them from the first foundation of their city,
which they carried as far back as the time of the foundation of
Home.*
We learn from the Saxon Chronicle that, in the Danish inva-
sion of the year 994, ' Anlaf and Swegen came to London, on
the Nativity of St Mary (Sept. 8), with ninety-four ships ; and
tliey then continued fighting stoutly against the town; and
would eke have set fire to it. But they there sustained more
harm and evil than they ever imagined that any townsmen
{biiruhwani) would be able to do unto them.' In 1009, the
men of Canterbury bought a peace with the Danish invaders,
aud then, as we learn from the contemporary authority just
quoted, the latter ' fought oft against the town of London ;
but, praise be to God, that it yet stands sound, and they there
ever fared ill.' In 1013, king Ethelred sought shelter in
London, Avhich was besieged by Swegen : ' When he came to
the town,' says the chronicle, ' the townsmen (seo burhwaru,
la honrgeolsie, it is a collective noun in the singular number)
would not submit, but held out against him with all their
might.' Although the Danes now overrun without opposition
the rest of the kingdom, the Londoners defended the Saxon
king, until at length he deserted his protectors, and then,
Swegen being generally acknowledged as king of England;
' the townsmen of London submitted, and delivered hostages,
because they dreaded lest he should utterly undo them.' f
When king Etlielred returned, after the death of Swegen, he
was again received by the Londoners, who formed his surest
defence. - In 1016, Edmund Etheling collected his forces
against Cnut. ' When the forces were assembled, then would
it not content them, except it so were that the king were
there with them, and they might have the help of the townsmen
of London.' As the townsmen would not go, Edmund's army
* Et dicebant cives Lundonienses fuisse quietos de theloneo in orrni fore,
et semper et ubique, per totain Angliam, a tempore quo Roma primu
t'undata fuit, et civitatem Lundonia; eodem tempore fundatum. Josceliue
de Brakclonde, p. 56.
t Compare W. Malmsb. de Gest. Reg. Angl. p. G9, with the Saxou
Chrouicle.
518 THE SAXONS. [chap. X' i.
dispersed itself. On king Etlielred's deatli, wliicli occurred tlie
same year, ' all the witan who were in London, and the towns-
men (seo burhwaru, William of Malmsbury calls them the
proceres Limdonice), chose Edmund to be king-.' The Danes
soon afterwards laid siege to London, but the citizens again
defended themselves with obstinacy, until Edmund came and
relieved them. They sustained a second siege the same year,
but, after Edmund's defeat at Assandun, ' the men of London
made a truce with the army.' *
It appears from the foregoing statements of a contem.porary
chronicler, that the men of London were brave and experienced
warriors; but they were evidently, like the citizens of the
Koman WAmicipium, not liable to be called out of their own
walls to fight, even when the country was on the brink of ruin
])y a successful invader ; and the power of the monarch over
ihem was very limited. In the course of the history I have
just recited, they act in every respect as a small independent
state. Another incident occurred at this period, which illus-
trates in a remarkable degree the extent of their power. When
archbishop Elfey had been slain by the Danes in 1012, the
Londoners purchased his body of the murderers, and deposited
it in St Paul's cathedral. After Cnut had obtained the crown
by conquest, and peace was restored, archbishop Agelnoth
( Elfey 's successor) applied to the king to give up the body of
the martyr to the monks of Canterbury. Cnut, wdio was then
jjolding his court in London, consented, but he would only
undertake to get away the body by deceiving the citizens. He
gave orders to his Jmscarles, or household soldiers, to disperse
themselves in parties, some on the bridge and along the banks
of the river, whilst others went to the gates of the city, and
there raised tumults and riots. t By dint of promises and
persuasions, the men who had the care of the body of Elfey
were prevailed upon to assist in the plot, and, whilst the atten-
tion of the citizens was called to the disturbances at the gates,
the sacred deposit was carried by stealth to the river and there
placed in a boat, which was roAvedin all haste beyond the limits
of the capital, and then landed in Kent. The king stood on
the bank of the Thames, and watched its progress with anxious
* Saxon Chi'onicle.
f Mandans omnibus familia3 sua? militibus, quos lingua Dannrum
hnscarles vocant, ut alii eoruui per extrenms civitatis portas seditiones cou-
c.itent, alii pontem et ripas fluminis armati obsideant, ne exeuntes eus; cum
Curpove sancti Lundanus pupulus pra^j^edire valeat.
ciiAr. XVI.] LOXDOX. 519
eye, for lie vxis of raid of the citlzeus* When tlie latter dis-
covered tlie trick which liad been played upon them, they sent
out a party in pursuit of the fugitives, who, however, had
reached a place of safety before they were overtaken.!
This anecdote gives us a curious glance at London manners
at the beginning of the eleventh century. About half a century
later, at the entry of the Normans, we find tlie citizens of
London again holding the same bold position ; and the con-
queror of Hastings was obliged to make conditions with them
before they would acknowledge him as king. It is not neces-
sary to enter into their subsequent history ; but it must be
stated to their glory that, if we begin with their defence against
the Danes, in the tenth century, the citizens of London have
been, through at least nine centuries, the constant, powerful,
and untlinching — perhaps, sometimes, turbulent — champions of
the liberties of Englishmen.
To return again to the more general subject, we trace by
various allusions during the Anglo-Saxon period, that in these
corporate towns there was, independent of the municipal officers,
an officer of the king, or king's reeve, who took certain tolls or
dues which were reserved for the king on sales, manumissions,
judicial executions, &c., and which tlie king had obtained in
the transmission of the municipal system from the Roman to
the Saxon government. Thus at Exeter, as we learn from the
entries on the Hy-leaves of the now Avell-known ' Codex Ex-
oniensis,' such duties were regularly paid to an officer ' for the
king's hand,' to use the phrase of the original ; as, for instance,
Alfric Hals took the toll in Tovie's house ' for ])8es kynges
liand ' (fol. 6, r°) ; Widfet took the toll 'for ]?as cinges hand'
(\'o\. 6, v"j, and so forth. When we hear of a Saxon king giving
a town to a queen, or to a bishop, or to an abbey, it means, of
course, that the king gave to those persons merely the duties
which accrued to him from the towns in question.
Although the municipal privileges were all derived directly
from the Romans, it does not of course follow that such privi-
leges Avere enjoyed only by towns which had been founded in
Roman times. As the Saxons became established throughout
the island, and adopted, to a certain degree, the manners of
their Roman predecessors, they founded other towns, and they
* Tiinclnit nainque civium intorruptiones.
t Tnuislatio S. Elphegi, ty Osborn, up. Act. SS. Ordinis Benedict.
s{«c. Yl. part. i. pp. 124 — 126. Osboni received his accuuut I'roin people
who were present, see p. 12j.
520 THE SAXONS. [cHAr. xvi.
naturally imitated the forms presented to their view in the
Roman models already existini^-. Most of these were, as tlie
Eoman towns had become, royal towns, that is, they had no
superior lord but the king. But others, after the conversion of
the Saxons to Christianity, gradually sprung up about, and
luider the protection of, episcopal sees and abbeys, and these
eventually received their rights and privileges at tlie hands of
their ecclesiastical protectors. Numerous instances of such
towns might be pointed out, such as St Alban's, Bury,
]-)everley, &c. It was more common for the early Saxon and
Frankish monarchs to give towns to bishops and abbots than
to any other class of persons, or, at least, gifts to ecclesiastical
dignitaries were always of a more permanent character. Hence
it arises that, at a later period of mediaeval history, we find
so many corporate towns whose charters are derived from
ecclesiastical, and not from lay, lords. On the continent, one
or two towns became, in this manner, ecclesiastical princi-
palities.
We trace in these ecclesiastical towns of the Anglo-Saxon
period the existence of a municipal government, and the same
jealousy of their privileges, as in the more perfect models de-
rived from Roman times. When the Danish king Swegen,
then at Gainsborough, ignorant or careless of local privileges,
demanded a tax of the people of Bedricsworth, or Bury St
Edmunds, the latter pleaded their exemption from royal taxes,
and refused to pay. The monks of St Edmund's of course took
their part, because to them the regular taxes of the town had
been given. Swegen was furious, and threatened with his
vengeance both the monks and the townsmen : but the ecclesi-
astics have recorded, exultingly, that that same night the hand
of death was laid upon the proiid and scornful Dane, and that
the country was thus delivered from one ferocious enemy.*
In the foregoing remarks, my ol^ject has been to bring toge-
ther a few historical incidents which, in the entire absence of
more explicit documents, seem to show clearly that the muni-
cipal government and privileges of corporate towns, derived
from Roman civilisation, had existed in this country, as on the
continent, uninterruptedly from Roman times. In these inci-
dents we trace here and there the pi'eservation of Roman forms
and Roman principles, and we trace still more distinctly almost
* An infprestina;- account of this afFiiir is given among the miracles of St
.Edmund, MS. Cotton. Tiber. B. II. fol. 25 and 26. See also W. Malmsb.
de Gest. Reg. p. 71-
CHAP. XVI.] CHARTER OF TOWNS. .*i?l
every municipal rig-ht and municipal power whicli were at a later
period guaranteed by royal or other charter, and which, by
comparison with the privileges and government of corporate
towns in France and Italy, and elsewhere on the continent, we
know to liave been derived from the political constitution of
the Romans. From these circumstances we are justified in
concluding that our municipal corporations were not the crea-
tions of the royal will in Norman times, but that they had
existed in a perfect form throughout the Saxon period. By
these considerations, also, we are enabled to understand better
the entries relating to the towns in Domesday Book. We find
there that in many of these towns the king received Jus rates
by his receiver (the pr^sposUiis rerjis), from each particular
person from whom they were due individually, and in each
individual case. In such towns the numbers of burgesses paying
rates are enumerated, both in the time of king Edward and in
that of king William. Tiie propositus regis, or king's reeve,
is frequently mentioned, as at Dover, Lewes, Guildford, &c.
In other instances, and these are not few, we find that the
municipality, to escape the too officious interference, and some-
times oppressive conduct, of a collecting officer who was not
under their own jurisdiction, had compounded for the king's
taxes, by the yearly payment of a certain sum of money. Such
was the case with Dorchester, Bridport, Wareham, Sliaftesbury,
Hertford, and other places. It was a very necessary safeguard,
especially for smaller towns, whose revenue the king might let
out to farm to some one who paid a certain sum, and mai'e as
much of it as he could, and would probably practise every kind
of extortion to enrich himself. This was experienced more
severely in Norman times ; and when the towns obtained
charters, they invariably bought the farm of the king's dues for
ever, which was called the fee-fi\rm of the town.
The judicial entries on the fiy-leaves of the Exeter manu-
script, written before and after the Conquest, show us that the
municipal forms and conditions of that city underwent no
change upon the transfer of the English crown to a Norman
line of sovereigns ; and such was probably the case in all other
cities and towns then in existence. But, although their privi- '
leges and constitution were in principle untouched, iu practice
they were frequently trespassed upon. A new race of feudal
lords had entered upon the land, who were ignorant of the
customs of the people over whom they had intruded tl\em-
selves, and who had little respect for any customs which stoo I
522 THE SAXONS. [chap. xvi.
as obstacles in the gratification of tlieir views of agi^randise-
ment. This must have led to continual riots and disturbances
in the old Saxon towns, and to infringements of their privileges
where they had little power to obtain permanent redress. After
undergoing all these vexations during a few years, they saw the
advantages — or we may perhaps better say the necessity — of
purchasing from the king written charters, confirming their old
rights, which became an effective protection in a court of law.
Thus originated municipal charters, which are rather to be con-
sidered as a proof of the antiquity, than of the novelty, of the
privileges they grant. They were given most abundantly under
Henry 11. and his sons, when it became the policy of the Eng-
lish monarchs to seek the support of the independent burghers
against a turbulent feudal aristocracy.
Perhaps we may be thought to linve wandered a little from
our immediate subject in the preceding remarks ; but in the
absence of all contemporary inibrmation on the state of the
Roman towns in Britain after they had fallen under the sub-
jection of the Saxons, it is only by these traces of their con-
dition at a subsequent period that we can perceive how the
Ixoman element of civilisation was preserved in them. They
hold a very important place in the history of social develop-
ment, ina-smuch as, while the country itself underwent so many
violent revolutions — while Britons, and Saxons, and Normans,
alteniately gained possession of the soil — the population of the
towns contimied to exist without any further alteration than
that gradual infusion of foreign blood which must necessarily
take place in the course of ages, and to which we owe that due
mixture of Saxon and Eoman that forms the basis of modern
civilisation.
If we possessed the necessary information on the subject, we
should no doubt find that the Anglo-Saxons had adopted many
of the arts and amusements of society from the Romans.
Although the large potteries and such establishments in the
country, having been deserted by the workmen, were no doubt
left in ruin, many of the manufactories, where they existed in
the towns, continued probably in activity. We know nothing
of the fate of public buildings in the towns, but we have a
proof that the amphitheatres continued in use, in the circum-
stan.ce that long afterwards we find them the scene of perform-
ances of bears and of bull-baiting. I have stated before that
the Anglo-Saxons adopted the Roman roads and bridges in
every part of the island. To the former they gave the name of
CHAP. XVI ] THE SAXON TK)ADS. .^23
Hin^eU {drret), a Avord no doubt derived from the Latin word
.sirnfa, by which probably tliey heard theni designated among
the Roman population. We may still trace their course, by the
continued recurrence of names of places in which the Saxon
word, under such forms as stret, drat, drcat, occurs in compo-
sition, as Stretton, Stratford, Streatham, &c. A glance at tlie
map will show that the great Roman military roads resolved
themselves into a few grand lines Avhich traversed the island in
diti'erent directions. Of these there were four principal lines,
of which perhaps the most important was that which ran from
Richborough or Dover, through Caul-e/uury and I.ondon, across
the island to Chester. The Saxons, who planted their own
local traditions wherever they settled, connected tiiis uoiidei'm'.
work with one of their own mythic traditions, and called it
AYiiitlinga-strset, the road of the Wsetlings, or sons of Wyetk,-'-
and it was celebrated down to recent times as the Watlinu-
street, a name still retained by the portion of it which ran
through London. To the road which ran direct from Pevensey
and Reguum through London, and by Lincoln and the great
Yorkshire towns to the south-east of Scotland, they gave i\\?.
name of Eormen-strget, the street of Eormen, who was one of
the chief Anglo-Saxon divinities, and whose name was often
compounded in those of persons and things which were regarded
as great or wonderful. The name at a later period was cor-
rupted to Ermyn-street. Two other great roads which crossed
the island, one from the coast of Norfolk, by Cambridge, Old
Sarum, and Exeter, to the extremity of Cornwall ; the other,
from the mouth of the Tyne to Gloucester, and thence to St.
David's ; were named the Iknield-street and the Ryknield-
street, but the origiu of these names is very doubtful. Other
roads of less importance received also their distinctive appel-
lations. Two, originating at the great saltworks at Droitwich,
* The milky way was also popularly called Watling- street, and it is
mentioned under this name in Chaucer's house of Fame :
Lo there, quod he, cast up thine eye,
Se yondir, lo, the galaxie,
The wiehe men clepe the milky way.
For it is white ; and some, p((>' /((ij,
Y-cullin it han Watlinge-strete.
Florence of Worcester, in his chronicle, under the year 1013, mentioning-
the British Watling--street, says, ' Omnia populisqui habitabant insepteu-
trionali plag-a Weatlingastreatro, id est strata quam filii Weatla? reg-is ab
orientali mare usque ad occidentale per Angliam straverunt." King
Weatla was no doubt a personage of the Anglo-Saxon mythology.
524 THE SAXOXS. [chap. xvj.
and proce(^,ding", one eastwardly to the coast of Lincolnshire,
vlie other southwardly to the Hampshire coast, have been
desio^nated as the Salt-ways ; and another leading from the east
to Cirencester, was known as the Akeman-street, it is supposed
because it was the way by which invalids travelled to Bath, ono
of the Saxon names of which was Akemannes-ceaster, or the
citv of J aval ids.
CHAP. XVII J THE WELSH. OZD
CHAPTEfl XVTI.
wf'.'tii E.stp-blishments — Strath-Cluyd, Cornwall, Wales — Early sepulchral
inscriptions found in the two latter countries.
While the Saxon tribes were penetratinp^ into the island
fiom the east and south, other races were establishing them-
selves on the western side, whose history is completely lost. We
are assured by nearly contemporary writers that, when the
Teutonic invaders beo;an to harass Britain, the Picts and Scots,
who were of course joined by the Irish, carried on their de-
structive inroads on the other side of Britain, which would be
left in a comparatively defenceless state by the withdrawal of
the legions from Deva (^C/tester) and Isca {Caerleou) some
years before the Roman emperors relinquished the island.
From this time history and tradition are equally silent, until,
when we arrive again at the period when the annals of at least
one part of the island become authentic, we find three distinct
Celtic states in existence, that of the Strath-Cluyd Britons
in the north, that of the Wealas, or Welsh, in the moimtainous
region to which they have given their name, and which was
divided into several petty states, and that of the Cormvealas,
who gave their name to Cornwall. It has been a doubted
(juestion as to whence the population of these districts came,
whether they were the primitive Britons, who had arisen and
taken possession of the land of their forefathers ; whether they
were Caledonians from the north, who, like the Saxons, at last
settled down in the country which they had been accustomed to
invade ; or Irish from the neighbouring island ; or perhaps even
Armoricans, at a later period, from Gaul ; but the latter appears
to be the more correct explanation of the subject. We know
too little of the language of the Britons before Caesar's invasion
to found any certain argument upon it ; and all that we can say is,
that these Celtic settlers seem to have been a barbarous people,
o'lQ THE SAXOXS. L^^HAP. XVII.
who were much less tliau the Saxons capa1)le of l)enefitirig by tlif^
Roman civilisation with which they came in contact. We find no
antiqnities of this period among the Welsh, as we do among
the Anglo-Saxons, and in Wales at least the Eomaii towns seem
to have been mostly destroyed.
We can hardly doubt that it was the Caledonian Picts who,
while the Angles were establishing themselves in Bernicia and
Deira, got possession of the district extending on the western
side of the island from Lancashire, of which they formed a
kingdom, called by the Scots the kingdom of Strathcluyd,
because its northern limits lay upon the Clyde. They have
been called by historians Cumbrian Britons. The Cumbrian
('elts preserved, we know, two Eoman towns, Luguballium
m the neighbourhood of the wall of Hadrian, and a stron<>:
town on the waters of the Clyde, which had been called, under
the Eomans, Tamea and Theodosia. The latter became the
metropolis of the chieftains of the Cumbrians, and they named
it, from its situation, Al-cloyd ; the Irish Scots, their neigh-
bours, called it Dun-Breton, the- fortress of the Britons, a
name still preserved in that of Dumbarton, by which it is
known at the present day. Their southern town, Luguballium,
retained its old name, corrnpted, with the addition of caer,
which, like the Saxon ceaster, is a mere corrnption of th(3
Roman castrum, and was called Caer-luel, or Caer-leol, now
Carlisle. The legendary Scottish annalists give us names of the
kings of Strathcluyd, and speak of their exploits ; some of
them pretend that Carausius granted Cumberland and West-
moreland to a Scottish king named Crathlynt, in consideration
of important services which he had rendered to that usurper,
and they add that Crathlynt's son was confirmed in possession.
These, however, are no doubt mere ftibles ; and all that we
know with certainty is, that the Cmnbrian Britons were at an
early period engaged in war with the Angles, and that the
sonthern part of the kingdom of Alcluyd, with the city of
Carlisle, fell eventually under the power of the Northumbrian
kings. Carlisle is celebrated in British legend as the favonrite
]-esidence of king Arthur.
To judge by the tenor of these legends, the Cumbrians
appear to have preserved more of Eoman culture than the
Welsh or Cornish. The latter seems to have had a close con-
nection with the Irish and with the Celts of Armorica, and we
can hardly help believing that invaders from the one country,
and settlers from the '^ther, helped to swell its population.
CHAP, xvn.] THE CELTIC DISTRICTS. 527
They were dependent on the important Roman town of Isca,
which the Saxons called Exan-ceaster, the city on the river
Exe. The Corn-wealas preserved their independence until tliV
time of kin<^ Ethelstan.
Wales was divided under several petty chiefs, of whom those
who inhabited the southern district, where the principal lloman
towns stood, seem to have been the least barbarous. Hei'e
they are believed to have taken possession of the important
Roman town of Maridnnuni, and to liave preserved tlie niemoiy
of its ancient name in that of Caer-Marddyn, or Caermarthen,
which dnriuij; the mi(hlle ages was tlie most important town in
Wales. Most of the names of Roman towns in Wales were
preserved in the same manner, as in Caer-Seiont {Scgontluin\
Caer-Went (f^enta), Neath (Nldum), &c. ; and this might
certainly make us incline to l)elieve that the Welsh race was an
indigenous one, and that it consisted, at least in part, of ;r
population which had been left there by the Romans. In
memory of tlie second legion, which had been so long estab-
lished at \\m Silurian Isca, they gave to the ruins of that city
the name of Caer-Legion, the city of the legion, now softened
to Caerleon. They gave the same name of Caer-Legion to
Deva, or Chester, the head-quarters of the twentieth legion.
ft is a remarkable circumstance connected with these Celtic
kingdoms, that when we first become acquainted with them — ■
about the time of St Augustine— we find that Christianity
was established among them. We have no evidence, indeed,
that the Cumbrian Britons were Christians, and we may per-
haps presume the contrary ; but there can be no doubt that the
Welsli and the ]3eople of Cornwall professed the Gospel, and tlie
former had a large establishment of monks at a place called by
the Saxons Bancorna-byrig, which probably occupied the old
Roman station of Bovinm, which may have been called at the
close of the Roman period Banchorinm (a name found only in
the Itinerary of Richard of Cirencester), and is supposed to
be the place now called Baugor Iscoed, in the Welsh county of
Flint. The origin of Christianitv in Cornwall and Wales is a
Very obscure question, and one which it is not a part of our
plan to discuss. It has been already intimated that we find no
traces of Christianity among the innumerable Roman remains
found in this country ; and the Christian faith of the Britons
seems to have been closely allied with that of Ireland. To
this connection the later legends of the Welsh and Cornish
saints seem distinctly to refer; and we might be induced by
523 THE AVELSIl. [chap. xvri.
these legends and otlier circumstances to suspect that their first
missionaries came from Spain or Armoi'ica, after the period
wlien the island was relinquished by Rome.
There is one class of antiquities ibutid in Wales and Corn-
wall, but more especially in the latter county, wliich appears to
belong- to the period following immediately after that of the
departure of the Roman legions. These are large, roughly-
hewn stones, bearing sepulchraL inscriptions, in letters nearly
resembling those of the late Roman monuments. They are in
Latin, bnt the names are apparently Celtic, and they give
simply the name of the individual commemorated and his
father. They differ from the Roman inscriptions in this, that
usually the inscription runs the length way of the stone, instead
of being read across. A number of examples will be found in the
volumes of Lysons's Magna Britannia for Devonshire and Corn-
wall, and in Borlase's Antiquities of Cornwall. One of the
earliest and best preserved stands in the parish cf St Colomb
Minor, in the latter county ; it is five feet high, by twenty
inches in width, and the inscription is particularly curious, as
giving to the person it commemorates the Roman title of
tribune : —
HONEMIMOR Honemimorus
TRIBVN the tribune.
Another of these stones, which is found at Lanyon, in the
parish of Maddern, where it is popularly known as the men
skrjjfa, or inscribed stone, has the inscription ; —
RIALORRAX Rialobranus,
CVXOVAL FIL son of Cunovalis
The inscription on a similar stone, at Tavistock in Devonshire,
is : —
NKPRAXl ISepranins,
FiLi CONDEVI son of Condevus.
Lysons gives two others found in Devonshire, at Buckland
Monachorum, and at Lastleigh. One, which had been used
as the gate-post to the vicarage-house at St Clement's, near
Truro, had the following inscription in one line, giving a
Roman name combined with a Celtic or a Teutonic name : —
ISNIDC VITAL FILI TORRici Isniocus Yitalis, son of Torricus.
Sometimes the words Jdc jacet are added to the inscription.
Thus the inscription on one of these monuments, standing in the
CHAP. XVII.] EARLY SEPULCHRAL INSCRIPTIONS. 529
road between Eowey and Castledor, and popularly called from
its height (eight feet) the long stone, is : —
c^RVRivs Hic lACET Cirusius lies here,
CVNOMOKI riLivs the son of Cunomorus.
At Worthyvale, not far from Camelford, in Cornwall, there
is an inscribed stone, nine feet nine inches long, and two feet
three inches wide, which had been formerly thrown across a
small stream to serve as a bridge. The inscription is : —
CATiN HIC lACiT Catinus lies here,
riLivs MAGAKi the son of Magarus.
These inscriptions are usually assigned, and probably with
reason, to the fifth and sixth centuries. Those found in Wales
have generally a mixture of cursive letters with tlie capitals,
and belong apparently to a later period, perhaps from the nintli
to the eleventh centuries. One stone, however, which was dis-
covered near the Eoman road from Nidum {Neath) to the
southern Bovium {Eioenny), is of a date as early as those found
in Ccrnwall, and is expressed in the same form. The insmp-
tion. in one line, commemorates Cantusus, the father of Pavi-
nus : —
HICI ACIT CANT"\ SVS TATER PAVINVS.
It was evidently written by one who spoke Latin corruptly ;
but its greatest singidarity is the circumstance that the inscrip-
tioit is cut on the back of an older inscribed stone, dedicated to
the emperor Maximinus ; and although the pure Roman in-
scription is written in lines across the stone, the later inscription
is written, like those found in Cornwall, lengthways. It re-
mains to be stated that one or two of these stones have evi-
dently had a cross at the top, so that there can be no doubt of
the people to whom these belonged being Christians.
5J K
1
APPENDIX.
T.— THE ITINERARIES AND LISTS OF TOWNS.
In our fifth chapter we have given a general account of the Roman
towns in Britain, with their modern representatives, as far as these
have been ascertained, or where they have been fixed conjecturally.
Many of them are identified without any room for doubt, while others
(though comparatively few) remain still uncertain, from errors in the
distances given in the Itineraries, or for the want of a proper investi-
gation of the neighbourhoods in which they must have stood. It will
be perhaps of use, to assist such investigations, if wo give here the
texts of the Itineraries relating to our island, with the distances as there
given in Roman miles.
The first and most undoubtedly authentic of these is the great Itinerary
of the Roman empire which goes under the name of Antoninus Augustus.
It is supposed to have been composed about the year 320. The best
edition is that of "Wesseling, from which the portion relating to Britain is
here taken.
A Gessoriaco de Galliis Ritupis in
portu Britanniarum stadia
numero ccccl.
(1) A limite, id est a vallo, Prse-
torio usque . m. p. clvi.
A Bremenio Cor-
stopitum . m. p. xx.
Vindomora . . m. p. ix.
Vinovia . . m. p. xix.
Cataractoni . . m. p. xxii.
Isurium . . m. p. xxiv,
Eburacum, leg.
vi victrix . m. p. xvii.
Derventione . m. p. vii.
Delgovitia . . m. p. xiii.
Praetorio . . ni. p. xxv.
(2) Iter a vallo ad portum Ritupis,
m. i[>. cccclxxxi, sic :
A Blato Bulgio
Castra Explo-
ratorum
. m.
P-
xii.
Luguvallo
. m.
P-
xii.
Voreda
. m.
P-
xiv.
Brovonacis
. m.
P-
xiii.
Verteris
. m
P-
xiii.
Lavatris .
. m.
P-
xiv.
Cataractoni
. m.
P-
xiii.
Isurium
. m.
P-
xxiv.
Eburacum
. m.
P-
xvii.
Calcaria
. m.
P-
ix.
Camboduno
. m.
P-
XX.
Mamucio
. in.
P-
xviff.
Condate .
. m.
P-
xvij;.
532
ArPEXDIX.
Deva leg. xx. vie
trix . . .
Bovio
Mediolano . .
Rutunio .
Uroconio . .
Uxacoiia .
Pennocrucio
Etoceto
Manduessedo .
Venonis .
Bennavenna
Lactodoro .
Magiovinto
Durocobrivis .
Verolaniio
SuUoniacis .
Londinio .
Noviomago . .
Vagniacis
Diirobrivis . .
Durolevo .
Duroverno . .
Ad portuni Ri-
tupis .
ni. p.
m. p.
m. p.
m. p.
m. p,
m. p.
m. p.
in. p.
m. p.
m. p.
m. p.
m. p.
m. p.
ni. p.
m. p.
ni. p.
m. p.
m. p.
m. p.
m. p.
m. p.
m. p.
XX.
X.
XX.
xii.
xi.
xi.
xii.
xii.
xvi.
xii.
xvii.
xii.
xvii.
xii.
xii.
ix.
xii.
X.
xviii.
ix.
xiii.
xii.
m. p. xii.
^"8) Iter a Londinio ad portum
Dubris, n>. p. Ixvi, sic :
Durobrivis . . m. p. xxvii.
Duroverno . m. p. xxv.
aC. i»ertuni Du-
bris . . m. p. xiv.
{-t'f iter a Londinio ad portuni
Lemanis, ni. p. Ixviii, sic :
Durobrivis . . m. p. xxvii.
Duroverno . m. p. xxv.
Ad portuni Le-
manis . . m. p. xvi.
(';) Iter a Londinio
vallum, m. p
Caesaromago
Colonia
Villa Faustini .
Icianos . .
CaniDorico'
Duroliponte . .
Durobrivas
Causennis . .
Lindc
Segeloci . .
Dano
Legeolio . .
Eburaco .
Isubrigantunx .
Cataractoni . .
Luguvallio ad
. ccccxliii, sic :
m. p. xxviii.
m. p. xxiv.
m. p. XXXV.
m. p. xviii.
m. p. XXXV.
ni. p. xxv.
m. p. XXXV.
m. p. XXX.
ni. p. xxvi.
m. p. xiv.
m. p. xxi.
ni. p. xvi.
m. p. xxi.
m. p. xvii.
m. p. xxiv.
(fi)
liavatris .
Verteris
Brocavo .
Luguvallio , .
Iter a Londinio
clvi, sic ;
Verolamio
Durocobrivis .
Magiovinio
Lactodoro . .
Isannavatia
Tripontio .
V8nn,..nis . .
Ratis
Veronieto . .
Margiduno
Ad Ponteni . .
Crococalano
Lindo
m. p. xviii.
m p. xiii.
ni. p. XX.
ni. p. xxii.
Lindo, ni. p.
P-
P-
P-
P-
P-
P-
P-
P-
m. p.
m. p.
m. p.
in. p.
m. p.
xxi.
xii.
xii.
xvi.
xii.
xii.
ix.
xii.
xiii.
xiii.
vii.
vii.
xii.
(7) Iter a Regno Londinio, ra
xcvi, sic :
Clausentum . m. p. xx.
Venta Belgaruni in. p. x.
Calleva Attreba-
tum . . m
Pontibus . . m
Londinio . . ni
xxn.
xxii.
xxii.
(8) Iter ab Eburaco Londinium,
m. p. ccxxvii, sic :
Lagecio
Dano .
Ageloco .
Lindo .
Crococalano
Margiduno
Vernemeto .
Ratis
Vennonis
Bannavanto
Magiovinio
Durocobrivis
Verolamio
Londinio
m. p. XXI.
m. p. xvi.
lu. p. xxi.
m. p. xiv.
m. p. xiv.
m. p. xiv
111. p. xii.
m. p. xii.
111. p. xii.
in. p. xviii.
m. p. xxviii.
m. p. xii.
m. p. xii.
m. p. xxi.
(9) Iter a Venta Icenorum Lon-
dinio, m. p. cxxviii, sic :
Sitomaao .
Combretonio
Ad Ansani .
Camuloduno
Canonio .
Cajsaroinago
Durolito .
Londinio
m.
ni.
m.
m.
m.
ni.
m.
m.
xxxii.
xxii.
XV.
vi.
ix.
xii.
xvi.
XV.
ITINERARY OF ANTONINUS
5.'] 3
(10) Iter a Glanoventa Mediolano,
m. p. cl, sic :
Galava
Bravinio .
Viroconio
Alone .
Galacuin .
Bremetoiiaci
Cacicio
Mancunio .
Condate .
Mediolano .
m. p. xviii.
m. p. xu.
ni. p. XIX.
ni, p. xxvii.
111. p. XX.
ni. p. xvii.
111. p. xviii.
in. p. xviii.
(11) Iter a Sep:ontio Devam, m. p.
Ixxiv, sic :
Conovio . . m. p. xxiv.
Varis . . . m. p. xix.
Deva . . m. p. xxxii.
(12) Iter per Muridunum
nium, ni. p. clxxxv
Vindomi . . m. p.
Venta Belgaruni ni. p.
Brige
Sorbioduni . .
Vindogladia
Dumovaria
Muriduno .
I sea Duninunio-
rum
Leucaro . .
Nido
Bomio . . .
Iscae, leg:, ii. Au-
gusta
Burrio .
Gobannio
Waa-nis
m. p.
m. p.
m. p.
ni. p.
ni. p.
m. p.
ni. p.
m. p.
m. p.
m. p.
m. p.
ni. p.
ni. p.
Viroco-
i, sic :
XV.
xxi.
xi.
ix.
xii.
viii,
xxxvi.
XV.
XV.
XV.
XV.
xxvii.
ix.
xii.
xxii.
m. p. XXIV.
m. p. xxvii.
(13) Iter ab Isca Calleva, m.
cix, sic :
Burrio
Blestio
Ariconio .
Glevo .
Durocornovio
Spinis
Calleva
ni. p.
m. p.
m. p.
m. p.
ni. p. xiv,
ui. p. XV.
111. p. XV.
IX.
xi.
xi.
XV.
(14) Item alio itiaere ab Isca
Calleva, in. p. ciii, sic :
Venta Siluruni . m. p. ix.
Abone
Trajectus
Aquis Solis
Verlucione
Cunetione
Spinis .
Calleva
m. p. IX.
ni. p. ix.
in. p. vi.
m. p. XV.
m. p. XX.
m. p. XV.
111. p. XV.
(15) Iter a Calleva Isca Dumnu-
niorum, m. p. cxxxvi, sic ;
Vindomi . . in, p. xv.
Venta Belgarum ni.
Brige . . m.
Sorbioduni . . ni.
Vindogladia . m.
Durnovaria . . in.
Muriduno . m.
Isca Dumnunio-
rum . . ni. p. xv.
XXI.
xi.
viii.
xii.
viii.
xxxvi
The description of Britain attributed to Richard of Cirencester has
been ihe subject of much discussion, and appears to be made up of
very discordant materials. How much was r«a)ly the work of a monk
of Westminster, and iiow mucn we owe to the modern editor, Bertram
of Copenhagen, it is not easy to say, for the manuscript has very
strangely disappeared. It is supposed, however, that the old monk may
have had before him a Roman Itinerary similar to that of Antoninus, or
perhaps a map, from which he extracted the part relating to Britain,
which is inserted in his book under the title of Diaphragmata. I confess
that the more I read this book, the more I am inclined to believe that the
M'hole is a mere fabrication. The following is the text of Richard's
Diaphragmata, which is in some parts imperfect, as stated, from the
damaged state of the manuscript : —
^
Iter I. Rhutupis prima in Bri-
tannia insula civitas versus
Galliam, apud Caiitios sita, a
Gessoriaco Boununiai portu,
unde commodissimus in su-
pradictam insulam transitus
obtingit, ccccl. stadia, velut
alii volunt xlvi. mille pas-
o34
APPENDIX.
suum reniota. Ab eadeni
civitate ducta est via Guethe-
lino^a dicta, usque in Segon-
tiuin, per ni. p. cccxxiiii. plus
minus, sic :
Cantiopoli, quae et
Dm-overno . . m, p. x.
Durosevo . . xii.
Duroprovis . . xxv.
deinde in. p. xxvii. transit 'Ihame-
sin, intrasque provinciani Fla-
viain et civitatem Londiniuin
(Aug'ustain),
Sulomag-o . . m. p. ix.
Verolamio Tuuni-
cipio . . . xii.
Unde fuit Amphibalus et Albanus
inartyres.
Foro Diaufe . . xii.
Mag'iovinio . . xii,
Lactorodo . . xii.
Isantavaria , . xii.
Tripontio . . xii.
Benonis ... ix.
Hie bisecatur via, alterutrumque
ejus brachium Lindum usque,
alterum versus Viriconiuiu
proteiiditur, sic ;
Manduessuedo . m. p. ix.
Etoceto . . xiii.
Pennocrucio . . xii.
Uxaconia . . xii.
Yirioconio . . xi.
Banchorio . . xxvi.
Deva colonia . x.
Fines Flavian et Secundfe.
Varis . . . in. p. xxx.
Conovio . . . XX.
Seguntio . . xxiv.
Iter II. A Seguntio Virioconium
usque m. p. Ixxiii, sic :
Heriri monte . in. p. xxv.
Mediolano . . xxv.
Ilutunio . . xii.
Yirioconio . . - xi.
Iter III. A Londinio Lindum
coloniaiii usque, sic :
Durosito . . m. p. xii.
Csesaromago . . xvi.
Canonio . . xv.
Camaloduno colonia ix.
Ibi erat teinplum Claudii, arx
triumphalis, et imago Yic-
toriie dea3.
Ad Sturium am-
nem . . , m. p. vi.
et finibus Trinobantum Ceniman-
nos advenis.
Cainbretonis
in. p. XV.
Sitomago
xxii.
Yenta Cenom.
xxiii
Camborico . .
xxii.
Duraliponte .
XX.
Durnomago . .
XX.
Isinnis .
XX.
Lindo
XX.
Iter lY. A Lindo ad vallum
usque, sit; :
Argolico . . m. p. xiv.
Dano . . . XX.
Ibi intras Maximam Caisariensom.
Legotio . . m. p. xvi.
Eboraco municip.
olim colonia sex-
ta ... m. p. xxi.
Isurio . . . xv'i.
Cattaractoni . . xxiv.
Ad Tisain . . y.,
Yinovio . . . x'.i.
Epiaco . . . x;x..
Ad Murum . . ij;.
Trans Murum intras Yalentiam.
Alauna amne . m. p. xw.
Tueda flumine . xxx.
Ad vallum .
er Y. A
linii
te
X 1
ajlui'um
usque, sic
Curia
. . m.
P-
. . .
Ad Fines
i...
r-
. . .
Bremenio
.
m.
P-
...
Corstoplio .
XX.
Yindomora
,
ix.
Yindovio
xi-:.
Cattaractoni
,
jk.A..A.
Eboraco
X..
Derventione
.
\r..
Delgnvicia .
x;ii.
Prieturio .
.
.<..-» , .
Iter YI. Ab Eboraco "Oevam
usque, sic :
Calcaria . . m. p. ix.
Camboduno . . xxii.
Mancunio . . xviii.
Finibus MaxiiUcie et
Flaviae . . xviii.
Condate . . xviii.
Dova . . . xviii.
ITINERARY OF RICHARD.
535
Iter VII. A portu Sistuntiorum
Eboracum usque, sic :
Rerigonio . . m. p. xxiii.
Ad Alpes Peninos viii.
Alicana ... x.
Isurio . . . xviii.
Eboraco . . . xvi.
Iter VIII. Ab Eboraco Luguva-
lium usque, sic :
Cattaractoni
Lataris .
Vataris
Brocavonacis
Vorreda
Lugiibaiia
xl.
xvi.
xvi,
xviii.
xviii.
xviii.
Iter IX. A Luguballio Ptoroto-
rurn usque, sic
Trimontio
Gadanica
Corio .
Ad Vallum
Incipii; Vespasiana.
Alauiia
Lind'j
Vijtcria
Ad Iliernani
Orrea .
Ad Tavum
Ad JEsicain
Ad Tinam
Devana
Ad Itunam
Ad montem Gram
pium
Ad Selinam
Tuessis
Pto"( tone
m. p.
m. p.
m. p.
XII.
ix.
ix.
ix.
xiv.
xix.
xxiii.
viii.
xxiii.
xxiv.
m.
m.
Iter X. Ab ultima Ptorotone per
ni'jdium insula? Iscam Damno-
ncrum usque, s
ic :
Va^is .
m.
P-
viii.
Ad Tuessim .
xvMii.
Tatnpa .
xxix.
ra.
P-
xxi.
xn Medio
ix.
Orrea .
ix.
Victoria .
xviii.
Ad Vallum .
xxxii.
Luguballia
Ixxx.
Brocavonacis
xxii.
Ad Alauuam .
. m.
P-
• • •
Coccio .
m.
P-
. . .
Maucunio
Condate
Mediolano
Etoceto
xxni.
xviii.
m. p.
Salinis .
m. p.
Glebon colonia . m. p. . . .
Corino . . . xiv.
Aquas Solis . . m. p. . . .
Ad Aquas . . xviii.
Ad Uxellam am-
nem . . . m. p. . . .
Isca . . . m. p. . . .
Iter XI. Ab Aquis per viain
Juliam Menapiam usque, sic ;
Ad Abonani . m. p. vi.
Ad Sabrinam . . vi.
Undo trajectu intras in Brit-
taniam Secundam et statio-
nem Trajectum m. p. iii.
Venta Silurum . viii.
Isca colonia . . ix.
Unde fuit Aaron martyr
Tibia amne . . m. p. viii.
Bovio . . . XX.
Nido . . . XV.
Leucaro . . . xv.
Ad Vigesimum . xx.
Ad Menapiam . xix.
Ab hac urbe per xxx. m. p. navi-
gas in Hybemiam.
Iter XII. Ab Aquis Londiniuni
usque, sic :
Verlucione . . m.
Cunetione . .
Spinis .
Calleba Attreba-
tum . . . XV.
Bibracte . . xx.
Londinio . . . xx.
p. XV.
XX.
XV.
Iter XIII. Ab Isca Uriconium
usque, sic :
Bultro .
Gobannio.
Magna .
Branogenio
Uriocouio
p. vni.
xii.
xxiii.
xxiii.
xxvii.
Iter XIV. Ab Isca per Glebon
Lindum usquc^, sic :
Ballio . . . m. p. viii.
Blestio . . . xii.
Sariconio . . xi.
Glebon colonia . xv.
536
APPENDIX.
Au Amonam .
Alauna
. ir
. p. XV.
XV.
Voluba
m. p. xxviii.
Vennonis
. ni.
P-
xii.
Cenia
ni. p. . . .
Ratiscorion
xii.
Venromento
xii.
Iter XVII. Ab Anderida [Ebora-
Margiduno
xii.
cum] usque, sic
■
Ad Pontem .
xii.
Sylva Anderida
m. p. . . .
Crococolaua .
^
.
• • •
Noviomago .
ni. p. . . .
Lindum
xii.
Londinio .
Ad Fines
ni. p. XV.
ni. p. . . .
Iter XV. A Lone
inio
per Clau-
Durolisponte . .
m. p. . . .
sentuni iu Loiidinium,
sic:
Durnoniago .
m. p. XXX.
Caleba
. m.
P-
xliv.
Corisennis . .
XXX.
Yindomi
XV.
Lindo .
XXX.
Venta Belgarum
xxi.
In Medio
XV.
Ad Lapidem
vi.
Ad Abum .
XV.
Clausento
iv.
Unde transis in Maxiniam.
Portu Magno
X.
Ad Petuariani .
m. p. vi.
Regno .
X.
Deinde Eboraco, ut
Ad Decirnum .
X.
supra
m. p. xlvi
Anderida portu .
m.
P-
. . .
Iter XVIII. Ab
medium insul
Eboraco per
fe Clausentum
Ad Lemanum
m.
P-
XXV.
Lemaniano portu
X.
usque, sic :
Dubris .
X.
Legiolio . . ,
m. p. xxi.
Rhutupis colonia
X.
Ad Fines
xviii.
Regulbio
X.
m. p. xvi.
Contiopoli .
X.
m. p. xvi.
Durolevo .
xviii.
xii.
Made .
Derventione .
m. p. xvi.
Vagnaca .
xviii.
Ad Trivonam . .
xii.
Noviomago .
xviii.
Etoceto
xii.
Londinio . .
XV.
Manduessuedo
Benonnis
xvi.
xii.
Iter XVI. A Londinio
Ceniara
Tripontio . .
xi.
usque, sic :
Isannavaria .
xii.
Venta Belgarum .
m.
P-
xc.
Brinavis .
vii.
Brige .
xi.
^lia castra .
xvi.
Sorbioduno . .
viii.
Dorocina .
XV.
Ventageladia
xii.
1'araesi
vi.
Durnovaria .
ix.
Vindomi .
XV.
Moriduno
xxxiii.
Clausento
xlvi.
Isca Damnon
XV.
Plurima insuper
mani in Brits
suis quseque n
habebant Ro-
mniis castella,
Durio amne .
. m.
P-
...
mris, turribus,
portis, et repagi
ilis munita.
Tamara . . .
m.
P-
. . .
The work known by the title of the Cosmography of the anonymous
writer of Ravenna, is a treatise on geographical science compiled in
that city, apparently in the seventh century. Its writer had evidently
before him large maps of the provinces of the Roman empire, from
THE RAVENNA LIST.
537
which he derived liis lists of towns and rivers, but as he took them
without any apparent system, paying no attention to the roads of the
Itineraries, and as his names are written very corruptly, we can only
identify them by similarity of sound. Two manuscripts, one in the
Vatican, the other in the National Library in Paris, furnish various
readings, which sometimes give assistance in explaining the printed
text. I here give the part relating to Britain, placing opposite such of
the names as can be made out, the parallel names from the two pre-
ceding Itineraries, or the conjectures of Horsley as to the present sites.
Such of the various readings as seem important are given at the foot
of the page.
In Britannia plurimas fuisse
legimus civitates et castra, ex
quibus aliquantas designare volu-
mus, id est, —
Giano
Eltabo
E Iconic
Nemetotacio
Tamaris . . . {Tamerton)
Durocoronavis
Pilais
Vemalis
Ardua
Ravenatone
Devionisso
Statio Deventia
Stene
Duriarno . . (Durnovaria)
Uxelis . . [Lostwithiel)
Vertevia
Melarnoni
Scadum Namorum (Isca Dum-
noniorum)
Termonin
Mostevia
Milidunum
Apaunaris
Masona
^ Alongium
Item juxta suprascriptam civita-
tem Scndomorum est civitas
quae dicitur
Moriduno
Alauna silva
Omire
Tedertis
" Londinis
Canca
Dolocindo
Clavinio
(Maridunum)
Morionio
Bolvelaunio
Alauna
Coloneas
Aranus
Anicetis
^ Moiezo
Ibernio
Bindogladia . (Vinuo^-Iudia)
Noviomagno
Onna
Venta Velgarum (Vcnta Bi-lga-
rum)
Armis
Ardaoneon .
4 Ra vim ago .
Regentium
Leucomago
Cunetzone .
Punctuobice
Venta Silurum
Jupania
Metambala
Albinunno
Isca Augusta
Bannio .
Brenna
Alabum
Cicutio
Magnis .
Branogenium
Epocessa
Ypocessa
Macatonion .
Glebon colonia
Argistillum .
Vertis
Salinis
Corinium Dobunorum
Caleba Atrebatium . (Callsva)
Sorbioduuu!!. ';)
(Noviuinagut-)
(Leucaruir; ': )
. (Cunetio)
{Coivbridge)
^Tsca Silurum)
(Gobannium)
[Brenbriclge)
(Magna)
(Biuviniuiii)
(-.'^v.conium)
. (Glevum)
{Arwystli)
(Salinaj)
Alovergium, Vet. '^ Laiidinis, Fr. Lindinus, Vat. "^ Malezo, Vat.
4 Noviomago Regentium, t. e. Noviomagus of the Regni.
5;^8
APPENDIX.
1 Anderesio . . (Anderida F)
Miba . . . [Midhurst)
2 Mutuantonis
Lenianis . (Portus Lemanis)
Dubris . . . (Dubrae)
Durovemo Cantiacorum (Duro-
vernuni)
Rutupis . . . (Rutupiae)
Durobrabis . (Durobrivae)
Londini . . . (Londinium)
Taniese . . . (Tamesis)
Brinavis . . . (Brinavse)
Alauna
Uriconiuni Cornovinorum
Lavobrinta
Medioniaiio . (Mediolanum)
Seguntio . . (Segontium)
' Canubio . . . {Conway)
Mediolano . {Meivod)
Sandonio
T'rv.n vict'ix
Yeratino
Lutudaruin
r»orbenti(jno . (Derventio)
Salinis . . {JSantwich)
Condate
*Ratocorion . . (Ratae)
EUanori
Lectoceto . . {Litchfield)
^ lacio
Dulina . , (Dujwitffble)
Yirolaniuni . (Verulamiuni)
Londinium Augusta
Caesaromaguni
Camulodulo colonia (Camulo-
dunura)
Durcinate
Duroviguto
Durobrisin . . (Durobrivae)
Venta Cenomnm (Venta Iceno-
rum)
Lindum colonia
Banovailuni . . [Benwell)
Navione
Aquis . . {Aidon Castle)
Arneme'/: \.
Zerdotalia
Mantio
Alunna . {Allen ton, or Whetley)
Camulodonu . {Almonburij)
Calunio . . . {Coin)
Gallunio . . ( Whaley)
Modibogdo
Cantiurneti
Juliocenon
Gabrocentio . {^Gabrosentai)
Alauna
Bribra
Maio
Olerica
Derventione . . (Derventio)
Ravonia . . {Ravenglosse)
Bresneteuati Vetcranorum {Over-
borough)
Pampocalia
Lagentiuni
Valteris . . . (Vert eras)
Bereda .... (Voreda)
Lugubalum . (Luguballiuni)
Magnis . . . (Magna)
Babaglanda . (Amboglanna)
Vindolande
Lineojugla
Vinovia . (Vinovium)
Lavaris . . . (Lavatrae)
Cataractonion . (Cataracto)
Eburacum
Decuaria . . (Petuaria)
Devovicia . . . (Delgovitia)
Dixie
Lugvmdino
Coganges . {CayngJiam)
Corie .... (Corium)
Lopocarium
Iterum sunt civitates ipsa in
Britannia, quae recto traniite
de una parte in alia, id est
de oceano in oceano, et Sis-
tuntiaci dividunt in tertia
portione ipsam Britanniani ;
id est, —
Serduno . . (Segedunum)
Conderco . . (Condercum)
Vindovala . . (Vindobala)
Onno . . . (Hunnuni)
Celunno . . . (Cilumum)
Procoliti . . (Procolitia)
Yolurtion . . (Borcovicus F)
Aesica .... (-Slsica)
Banna . . . (Banna)
Uxeludiano . (Axelodunum)
Avalaria . . (Aballaba)
Maia
^ Fiir.ocedi
^ /Vrdereliomiba, Vat. ^ Mantuantouis, Vat. 3 Conovio.
Ratae Coritanorum. S Static Dulma, Vat. 6 Fauococidi, Vat.
THE RAVEXXA LIST.
.'^'^0
Brocara . (Crocavonacpe)
Croucingo . . {Crosby)
Stodoion
Sinetriadum
Clidum .
Carbantium
Tadoriton
Maporiton
Alitacenon
Loxa
Locatrene
Canibruiana
Snietri
Uxela
Lucotion
Corda
Camulossesa
Praesidium ,
Brigomono
Abisson
Ebio
Coritiotar
1 Celerion
Itucodon
Maremago
Duablisis .
Venutio
TrimuntiuTii
Ebiirocassuiii
Brenieniuiu
Cocuneda
Alauna
Oleiclavis
Ejudensca
Runiabo . {Drumburgh Castle)
Iterum sunt civitates in ipsa Bri-
tannia retro {al. recto) tra-
mite, una alteri connexa, ubi
et ipsa Britannia plus angus-
tissinia de oceano in oceano
esse dinoscitur, id est, —
Velunia
Volitanio
Pexa
Begesse
Colanica . . (Colania)
Medionenietom
■ Subdobiadon
Litana
Cibra
Credigone
Iterum est civitas qu« dicitur
- I a no
Maulion
{Glasgow)
(Carbantoriguni)
. . {Elgin\
[Innerlochy)
( Loch Catrine ?)
(Lucopibia)
(on Lough Cure)
{Camuloit)
(Rerigoniuni)
(Curia Otadenorum ?)
. [Calendar Castle)
{Duplin)
. (Banatia)
(Trin)ontium)
{Coquet)
{Alnwick)
. {Ogle Castle)
[ Dumfries)
Pemcrof-e^a
Cindocellum
Cerino
Veronio
Matovion
Ugrulentum
Ranatoniuni
Iberran
3 Praematis
Tuessis
Ledone
Litinoniagj .
Devoni
Memanturuni
Decha
Bograndium
Uguesto
Leviodanuin ^ ^
Poreo Classis IForfar, or linr*- <)
{Berwick)
. {Dunbar)
[Linlithgow)
{Livingston)
Levioxana
Cerniium
Victorice
Marcotaxvn
Tagea
Voran .
Sunt autem in
di versa loca,
{Lennox)
. {j\[enteith'\
.{Caer Voram\
ipsa Britannia
ex quipus aii-
quanta nominari vclumus, lu
est, —
Maponi
Mixa
Panovius
Minox
Taba . . . (Tava)
Manavi
Segloes
Daunoni
Currunt autem per ipsam Britan-
niani plurima flumina, ex
quibus aliquanta nominare
volumus, id est,-
Fraxula
Axium ,
Maina
Sarva
Tamaris
Nauruiu
Aboua
Isoa
Taniion ,
Aventio
Leuca
Juctius
(Ashbourne)
. {Axe,
. {Mintern)
{iieverne)
{ Taniar)
'Nacier, Wilts)
{Avon)
{lavy)
(Aun)
. 'Low)
C«lorion, Ku<.
Lane, Vat.
^ Pinna tis, Vaf.
0
APPENDIX.
Coantia
. {Keutzey)
Vividin .
( tnwey)
Dorvatium
{Bart, or JJarent)
Duiolani
{Leiiham river)
Anava
Alauna
Bdora
Coguvensuvon
{Soar)
Novitia
Durbis .
{Dour, or Dover)
Adron
Lemana
. {Lij»me river]
Certisnassa
^ Rovia .
{Rother\
(KacotA
Intraum
Ractomessa
Tinea
{Teing)
{Livor)
Senua
Liar
2 Ciiiiia
Lenda
Yelux
No via, Kif.
» Cunia velRT, Vat
APPENDIX II.
ROMAN POTTERS' MARKS.
It will be useful to local antiquaries to furnish them with a list of
the names of potters stamped on the red Samian ware, as mentioned
at p. 275. This list is naturally incomplete, for new names are turning?
up daily, but it will enable those who are occupied in researches on
Roman sites to judge it tne names they meet with are new, or of com-
n on occurrence, and it will assist the general reader in forming- a
notion of the extent of the Roman power. It will be observed in this
numerous list of names, that many are not Roman, and some are
a^iparently Teutonic. The explanation of the different formulae of the
potters will be found in our text at the page just referred to. It will
be seen in the list that most of the potters used the different formula)
indiscriminately.
Before these potters' marks were collected and explained, writers
who had met with single instances, fell into the most ridiculous mis-
takes in attempting to interpret them. Dr Leigh, who published in
1G99 a ' Natural History of Lancashire, Cheshire, and the Peak, with
an account of the Antiquities in those parts,' obtained at Ribchester,
where the Samian ware is found in great abundance, a fragment with
the stamp fab. pro {fabrica Frobi), which he conjectured must have
been made when one of the Fabii was proconsul or procurator !
A still more curious blunder was made in the county of Essex. By
the road siae, at Coga-eshall, in that county, a sepulchral interment
was found, in which, among other objects, was a vessel of Samian ware
with the stamp cocciLLi. M, which will also be found in the following
list. It was immediately interpreted as an abbreviation of CocciUl
incDiibus, to the manes of Coccillus, and it was resolved that, from this
personage, who was supposed to have been the lord of the spot, and to
have been buried there, the place derived its name of Coggeshall !
Such errors show us how necessary it is for the antiquary to begin by
studying his science elementarily.
At the end of the list of potters' marks, I have given very imperfect
lists of names stamped on mortaria and amphorai found in this island,
which have hitherto been less carefully noted than those on the
Samian ware. It will be observed that the formula; and the names are
ditierent.
The frequent use of the n, for E, will be observed in these potters'
marks. See the observations on this subject at p. 23o.
542
APPENDIX.
POTTERS' MARKS OX THE RED WARE, TERMED SAMTAN.
OF. A. AN
ABALANIS
OF. ABALI
OF. ABARI
OF. ABIN
ABIANI
ABILI. M
ACCILINVS. F
OF. ACIRAP
A. C. E. R. O
AGO. M
ACRIS. O
ACVRIO. F
ACVTVS
ADIECTI. M
ADIVTORI
L. ADN. ADGEXI
ADVOCISI
ADVOCISI. OF
ADVVCISI. O
AEI. XANT
AELIANI. M
AEQVIR. F
AEQVR. F
AESFIVINA
AIISFIVI. M (!')
AIISTIVI. M
AISTIVI. M
AESTIVI. M
M. INaiTaA
M. AIAVCNI
AETERNI. M
AGEDILLI
AGEEDILLVS. F
AGIILITO
OFF. AGER
OF. ALBAN
OF. ALBANI
ALBANI. M
ALBILLI. M
OF. ALBIN
ALBIN. F
ALBINVS
ALBINI. MA
ALBVCI
ALBVCIANI
ALBVS
ALBV8. FE
ALBVSA
ALIVS. F.
AMABIVS
AMANDO
AMARiLis. F (? Ama-
bilis)
AMATICI. OF
AMATOR
AMATORIS
AMIIEDV
AMICI. M
AMMIVS. F
AMONVS
ANDORN
ANISATVS
ANNLOS. F
ANVNI. M.
A. POL. AVSTI
At'oLAVCIR
OF. APRILIS
OF. APRIS
OF. APRO
APRONIS
AQVIINVS
AQVIT
AGVIT
OF. AQVITA
OF. AQVITANI
ARACI. MA
ARDAC
ARGO. P
ARICI. M
ARICI. MA
ARRO
ASCILLI. M
ASIATICI. M
ASIATICI. OF
ATECII. M
ATEI
ATIL1«\.NI. M
ATILIANI. O
ATILIAN. 01-
ATILIANVS. F
ATILLVS
ATTIUI. M
ATTILLI. M
ATTILLII. M
ATTINVL
ATTIVS. FE
AVCELIA. F
AVENTI
AVENTINI. M
AVGVSTALIS
AVGVSTINVS
AVITI. M
i AVITOS. OF
AVITVS
AVITVS. F
AVLIVS. F
OP. AVRAP
AVRICV. F
AVSTRT. M.
AVSTRI. OF
AVSTVS. F
B.
BALBINVS. F
BANOLVCCI
BASSI
OP. BASSI
OF. BASSICO
BELINICCI
BELINICCr. M
BELINICCVS. F
BELINOI. M
BELINICI
BELLIAIICI
BELSO. ARV. F
BELSO. ARVE. F
BENNICCI. M.
BENNICI. M
BICAAICD
BIGA
BIGA. FEC
OFIC. BILICANI (?)
BILICAT
OFIC. BILICAT
BILLICI
BILLIC. OP
BIO. FECIT
BIR. ANIII
BIRANII
BIRBIIIXI
BISENE . . ,
BISSVN
BITVRIX
BL. AESI
BOINICCI. M
BOLDVS
BONOXVS. P
BORTLL OP
BORILLI. M
BORILI.L OV
BORILLr. OKFIC
BORVSL FE
BOVTL M
BUACKILLO
POTTERS' MARKS.
nn
BIIICCI
MRICC. M
BRITAEXII
MV. 1)0
BVCCIO
M. BVCIANl
BVRDO. r
BVRDONIS. OF
OF. KVRILINDI
BVTRIV,
c.
C. C. F
CABIAN
CABRVS
CACAS. M
CACASI. M
CACILANTRO
CADDIRON
CAI. M. S
CAIVS. F
CAIVS. OF
OF. CAI. IVI
OF. CAIVI
CAKIVFDO. FE
CALENVS. OF
CALENVS. F
CALETI. M
CALAVA
CALCIO. F
T. CALIXA
CALLI. M
CALMVA. F
CALVI. M
OF. CAL
OF. CALVI
CALVINI. M
CALVINVS
CAMBVS. F
CAMPANO
CAMTI. M
CANAI. M
CAN. PATR
0. ANPATR
CANETII. M
CANRVCATI
CAPAS
CAPELLIV. F
CAPIIRI. O
CAPRASTAS, FE
CAPRASIVS
CARANI
CARANI. F
OF. CARAN
CARANT
FECI
CARANTIXI. M
CARATILLI
CARETI. M
CARBONIS. M
OF, CARI
CARINVS
CARINOS
CARITI
CARVS. F
CARO
O. CARO
CARVSSA
CASIVS, F
CASSIA. O
CASTVS
CASTVS. P
CASVRIVS. F
CATASEXTVS. V
CATIANVS
CATVCI
CATVLII
CATVS. F
CAVPI .
OF. CE
OF. CEI
CELSIANI. F
L. C. CELSI. O
CELSINVS
CELTAS. FC
CENETLI. M
M. CENI
CENSORI
CENSORIXI
OF. CEN
f OF. CENSO
I CENT. AI. E
! OF. CERA
I CEREA
i CEREALIS
CERIALIS
j CERIAL. M
I CERESI. M
I CERTVS. F
I CETI
I CHRESI. M
! CIAMAT. F
1 CIMINI
i CINIVS. M
j CINNAMI
I CINNVMI
i CINTIRIO. M
I CINTVAGENI
' CINT. VGEN'J
I CIN. T. VSSA
j CINTVSMI. J»i
I CINTVSMIJi
I CINTVSMV
CINTVSMVS. P
CIRIil. M
CIRRVS. FEO
CIVPPI. M
CLEMENS
CLIVINTI. O
COBNERTI. Sf
COBNERTVS
COCCIL. M
COCCILLI. M
OF. COCI
COCVRNV. F
COCVRO
COCVHO. P
OF. COE
OF. COKLI
OF, COET
OF. COFI
COLLO. P
COLLON
COLON
COMITIALIS
COMPRIN, P
COMPRINNL M
CONSERTI. M
CONGI. M
CONSTANS. P
CONSTAS. F
COSAXTIS. P
COSIA. F
COST. R . . .
COSIRV
COSIRVFIN
F. L. COS. V
COSMI. M
COSRV. P
COTTO. F
OF, COTTO
CRACIS. M
CRACI. S. M
CRACIS A. F
CRACVNA. P
CBANI
CRAOSNA. F
CRASS lACVS. F
CRAVNA. F
CRECIRO. OFI
OF. CREM
OF. ORES
CRESCENI
CRESCENTI
OF. CRESI
CREST. M
CRESIMT
M. CRFSTT
M. CRESTF. O
OF. CRESIIC
544
APrEXDIX.
CRIMVS. FE
CRISP IN I. ^[
CUOBISO M
CROHUO. y
CRVCVKO
CVCALl. M
CVCCIL
CVCCILIJ. M
OK. CVEN
CVFF
CVI. M
OFI. CVIRTTt
CVNI. I A. F
CVSPICI
CVTAI
D.
DAGO. M
DACUIMNVS. F
DAGO
D0G0DVBNV8. F
DAGOMARV.S
DAGOMARVS. F
DAGOMARVS. FiS
DAMIMI. M
DAMONVS
DAVICI. M
DECMI. M
DECVMINI. M
DECVMNI. M
DEM ... R. M
DESTEll. F
DIGNVS
DIOGNATO
DIVICATI. M
DIVICATVS
DIVICL. M
DIVIX
DIVIX. F
DIVIXI
DIVIXTI
DIVIXTVL
DMCCIVE
DOCALT. M
DOCCIVS. F
DOIICCI
DOECA
DOLIC (?)
DOMETOS. P
DOMINAC
DOMINCI
DOMINICr
D0MITIANV8. F
DOMITVS
DONATVS
DONATVS. F
DONNA. M
DONNA. OF
DONNAV
DONTIOM
DONV. M
DOVIICCVS
DOVIIICCVS
DRAVCVS. F
DRAVCI. M
DVPI . . .
DVKINX
E.
ECVESF.R
ELVIL J
OF. IIMAN
EPPA
EPPN
ERICI. M
EROK
E 03 CTI Cfi I. IVI
ERRIMl
ESCVSI
ETVS. F
1 1 VST
F.
0. FABIN
OF. FAGE
FALENDl. O
FELIX. F
FELIXS. F
FELICIO. O
FELieiS. O
OF. FELIC
OF. FELICI?
FELICIOMS
p. FELMA
FESTVS. F
FESTVS. FO
FETI \
FIR . . .
O. FIRMONIi^
FIVI. M
FLOI
FLORVS. I
FOVRI
FRONTINJ
FRONTINVS
O. FROM!
OF. FRONTf
G. FRONT IN I
OF. FHONTTNI
M. FVCA
OF. FYS
OFF. FYS
G.
GABRVS. P
GAIVS. F
GALHINVS. F
GENIALIS. FECI
GEMINI. M
GENITOR. F
G. E. N. I. T. O. R F
GENIV.
GERMANI
GERMANI. F
GERMANI. OF
GERMANYS
OFF. GER
GERTAL. M
GLVPEI. M
GONDI. M
GRACCHYS
GRANANI
GRANI
GRANIANI
GRANIO. M
GRANIVS. F
H.
HABICNS. M
HABILIS. P
HABITIS. F
HELI . . . VS. FI. FE
HELINIY
HELL . . . S. FKC
HIBI . . .
I.
I + OFFIC
lABI
lABVS. FK
lACOMIO. F
IANYARIV&
lANVARII
lANVARI. OF
lASSO. F
ICMCRIMO. F
IGINI. MA
ILLIANI. M
ILLIOMEN
POTTERS' MARKS.
ILLIOMUm
LOLLIVS. F
MARCELIJ. M
IMANN
LOSSA
MAUCELLI.>1. M
INPRINTV. F
OF. LOVIRILO
MA UCI
lOKNALIS
LVCANVS
MAKCI. F
TOVAXTI
LVCANVS. F
MARCI. MA
ISABINI. F
LVCANTVS. F
MAUCI. O
ISTVllOXIS
M. LVCCA
MARCILLI. M
IVCANVS. F
OF. LVCCEI
MAKCVS. Fl C
OF. IVCVX
LVGETO. FE
MARIM. M
IVENALIS. MA
LVPEI. M
MAUITVS. M
IVENIS. M
LVPI. M
MAROILLI. M
OF. IVLIA
LVPINI. M
MAUTANJ. M
IVLIA
LVPPA
OF. MARO
IVLIA. PATH
LYPPA
MAROI. M
OF. IVL. FAT
LVTAEVS
MARONI. M
IVLII. MA
LVTAEVS. FKC
MARONI. F
IVLIOS
LVTAFVS
MAR8I, M
IVLI. M
MAHSVS. FECI
IVLIVS. F
MARIAN I. M
IVINVMI. M
M.
MARTI
IVRONIS. OF
MAKTI. M
IVSTI. MA
MACCAIVS. F
MARTIALIS, FEC
OF. IVSTI
MACCALI. M
MARTIALIS. M
OF. IVVENAL
OF. MACCIA
MARTINI
MACCIVS
MARTIM. M
MACCIVS. F
MARTIN V
K.
MACERATI
MARTINVS. F
MACI. OF
MARTII. O
KALENDI. ()
MACILLI. M
MARTI VS
MACIRVS
MASCL
MACRI. M
MASCVLVS. F
L.
MACRIA
OF. MASCVL. .VVlilU
MACRINVI
MASVETI
O. LAE
MACRIXVS
MASVRIAXI
OF. LAHIONIS
MACRIANI. M
MAT EM I
LALLI. MA
MAGNVS. F
MATERXI
LANCIV . . .
MAIANVS
MATERNIXVS
LATINIAX. F
OF. MAIO
MATERNNI. M
LATIXIAXVS
MAIORI. M
OF. MATE
LATIXVS
MAIOR. I
MATRIANI
LIHEKALIS
MAIORIS
MATVCEXVS
LI15EKIVS
MAIORIS. F
MATVCVS
LIHER VS
MALCI. O
MATVRI. M
LIIJERTI. M
MALLIIDO. F
MATVRX
OF. LICIM
MALIVRX
MAXI. MA
OF. LICIXIAX
MALLI. M
MAXIMI
LICINILVS
MALLIACI
MAXMII. M
LICIXVS
MALLIACI. M
MAXMINI
LICIXVS. F
MALLICI. M
OF. MEM
LICXVS
MALLVRO. F
MEMORIS. M
LILTAXI. M (!')
MALXCNI
MERCA
LIXIVSMIX
MAMILIAXI
MERCAO
I.ITVOAMVS
MAXDVIL. M
MERCATOR
LOCCO. F
OF. MANX A
MERCATOR. M
LOCIRM. M
MANTIIO. F
MERCVSSE, M
LOGIRX. M
MANVS. F
MERCVSSA. M
L0LIV8. F
a. MAR. F
MEDETI. M
2 L
ArPEXDIX.
METHILLV8
METTI. M
MICCIO
MICCIO. F
MICCIOXIS. M
MIDI. M
MILIACI
MILIANI
MILLIAKII
OF. MINI
MINYLI. M
MINVS. FE
MINTS. O
MINVTIVS.
MISCIO. F
MO
OF, MO
OF. MODEST
OF. MODEST I
OF. MOE
MOM
I). MOM
MOMI. M
MON
OF. MOXO
OF. MONT AX I
OF. MONTRCI
OF. MONTEI
OF. MONTI
OF. MONTO
MOSSI. M
MOXIVS
MVISVS. F
OF. MVllRA
OF. MVIUIANI
OF. MVSEKA
MVXTVLI. M
MVXTVLLI. M
MVXIVIII. M {.-
N.
NAMILI
NAMILIANT
NANII. CKOES
OF. NAKIS
NASSO. F
NATALIS
O. NATIVI
NEBVRRI. OF
OF. NEM
NEPOTIS
NEKT. M
OF. NERT
NERTVS
OF. NEKI
NEQVREC
NICEPHOK
NICEl'IIOR. F
OF. NI
OF. NIGRI
OF. NIGRIAN
NIGRINI
NIMILIANI
OF. NITORI
NO HI LI AM. M
NORILIANVS
NVMIDI. M
IVL. NVMIDI
NVTIS
o.
OCRI. MA
ONATIVI {?)
OFPHIN (:)
OPTATI. M
OPVSIA
ORI. MAN {?)
OSBI. MA
OVIDI
P.
PANI. L. F
OF. PARI
PASSENI
PASSI. F
PASSIENI
OF. PASSIENI
OF. PASS [EN VS
O. PAS. F (r)
PATER. F
PATERATI. OF
PATERCLINI. OF
PATEHCLOS
PATEB0L03. FE'J
PATEUCLVS. F
PATERIKANVS. FIT
PP. PATERMI
PATERNI
PATEHNI. M
PATERNI. OF
PATERNVLI
PATIIRNV
PATNA. FEC
PATNI. FEC
PATRC M LIXI
PATRCIINI
PATRICI. M
C. AN. PATH
OF. PATHC
OF. PATKICI
OF. PATRVCI
PAA^LIANI
PAVLTVS. F
PAVEI. M
PAVLI. MA
PAVLIANI. M
PAVLLI. M
PAVLLVS. P
PAVLVS
PAZZENI
PECVLIAE
PECVLIAH. P
PECVLIARIS. F
PIINTII. MANV
PERE ....
PERECUILT
PEREGRIN
PERPET
PERRVS. F
PERVS
PERVS. FB
PITVRICI. M
OF. POLIO
OF. POLLIO
OF. PONTEI
OF. PONTHEI
PONTI. OFFIC
O. PONTI
POTIACI
POTITINI. M
POTITIANI. M
C. IVL. PR
PRID. FEC
PRI. IMO
PRIM
PRIM AX I
PRI MI
OF. PRIM
OFIC. PRIM
OF. PRIMI
PRIM IS
PRIMITIVI
PRIMVL
PRIMVLI
PRIMVL. PATER
OF. PRIMVL
OF. PRIMVS
PRISC. L. M
I PRISCINI. M
PRIVATI. M
OF. PRM
FAB. PRO
PROBI. OF
PROBVS. F
PROTVLI
rOTTERS' MARKS.
■ tn
OF. PVDEN
I'VOXI. M
I'VRIXX
I'VTHI. M
PYLADES
Q.
QVADUATI
(iVADUATVb
aVARTVS
QVAKTVS. I-
QVIETVS, !•■
QVINNO
aVIXTl. M
QVINTIXI. M
QVINTIXIAM
QV. C
R.
JIAC'VXA. F
KAMVLVS
KEHVUKI. or
KEBVHUIS
KEBVKRVS F
KECEN. F
KECMVS
REDITI. M
HEGALIS
REGALIS. F
REGEXVS
REGENTS. F
REGINI. M
REGINVS
REGINVS. F
RUGNVS
REGVILL
REGVLI. M
RIIGVLI. M
REGVLIX VS
REGVLIN. F
REXECR. M
RIIOGENI. M
REVILIXVS
RI. lOGEXl
OF. RICIMI
RIPAXI
RIVICA
ROFFVS. TY(^
ROFFVS. FE
ROIPVS. F
ROLOGEXI. M
ROMVLI. OF
KOPPVS. FF
ROPVSI. FE
ROPPIRVI. M
ROTTLAI. IM
OF. RVRA
RVFFI. MA
RVFFI. M
OF. RVFI
UVFIA
RVFIXI
RVFINI. M
OF. RVFIX
OF. RVFXI
RVFVS. FE
SA. ARTI (r)
OF. SAR
SABELLVi;
SAKELVr
SAJUAXl
SARIXIAXVS. I
SARINYS
SARINVS. F
SARINI, M
OFF. SAB
SACERVASIII
SAOERVASIFi'
SACEH. TASl. OF
SACERI. OF
SACEROT. M
SACIANT
SACIRAP. O
SACIRO. M
SACREM
SACRI. OF
SACRILI. M
SACROTI. M
SACROT. M. S.
SALIAPVSi
SALV. F
SALVS. F
SAMACVIS
SANTINVOV. O
SANVCIVS. F
SANVILLI M
SANVITTI. MA
SAREXTIV
OF. SARRVT
SATERNYS
SATERNIXE. O
SATVRNNI. OF
SATTO-. F
SCOLYS
SCOPLI. F
SCOPLI. M
SCORVS
SECANDI. M
SECANDJN
SKCINI
SECVNDI. OF
OF. SECVN
SECVNDINI
SEC VXD VS
SECVXDVS. F
SEDATVS. y
SEDATI. M
feEDETl. M
SKN[. A. M
hEXICA. M
SEXICI. O
SENILA. M
SENNIVS. F
8KXO. M
SENONI
SENTRVS. FE
SERRVS
SERVILIS
SEVERI
SEVElir. OF
SEVERI. M
OF. SEVKKI
SEVEEIAXVS
SEVEUIANI
SEVEIIIAXI. M
SEVER] N VS. YV.
OF. SEVERPVJi
OF. SEVIEMi
SEXTI. O
SEXTI. M
SEXTI. MA
SnXTI. J[A
SIIXTI. MAN
SEXTVS. F
SIIXTITJ. F
8HVLXI
SILDATIANI. M
SILENVS
SILVAXI
SILVIIRI. M
SILVI
SILVI. PATER
SILVINl
STLVINI. F
SILVI NVS. F
SILVI OF
C. SILVII
SILVI. PATIU. O
SILVIPATRICI
SILVVS
SIMVBS. O
SlNTVl^NV . . .
SITVSIRI. M
548
APPENDIX
SOIIILLI. M (?)
80LIMI. OKI
SOLLEiMNl. or
SOLLVS
SOLLVS. F
MA. SVETI
SVLPICl
OF. SVLPTCI
SVLPICIANI
SVOBNI. ()
SVODNED. OF
8VRIVS
SYMPHO
T.
TALLIN!
TASCONVS. F
TASCIL. U
TASCILLA
TASCILLI. M
TAVRI
TAVRIANVS
TAVRICVS. F
TEBBIL
TEDDI
TENEV. M
lEKRVS
TERCII. M
TEKT. M
TERTI. MA
TERTIVS
'J'EST\S. FO
TETTVR
TETTVH. O
TETVR. O
TITTICl
TITTILI
TITTIVS
TITVKI. M
TITVRONIS
TITVRONJS. OF
TVLLVS. F
TVLLVS. FE
TVUTVNN
V.
VACIR. O
C. VALA]?
VALERI
VAKIVS. F
VASSALI
VAXTI
VECETI. M
VEGETI. M
VENKUAND
VENI. M
VENICAKV? F
VERECV
VRRECVNDl
VEREDV. M
VERTECISA. F
VIIRI. M
VERVS
VESPO. i
VESPOXI
VEST. M
VESTRI. OF
VETERXIV
OF. VIA
VICARVS. r
VICTOR'. M
VICTORINVS
VIDVCOS. F
VIDVCVS. V
A'IMPVS
VINN
VIRIL
O. VIKILI
VIRILIS. F
OF. VIRTLLI
OF. L. COS. VTRIL
OF. L. C. VIRIL
OF. L. Q. VIRIL
VIRONI. OF
VI RT
VIRTHV
VIRTHVS
V1RTHV8. FECI-^
VIRTIVAS
VIRTVTI. F
OF. VIRTVI IS
VISI. M
VITA
OF. VITA
OF. VITAL
OF. VIIALIS
OF. VITALI
VITAL]. OF
VITALIS. FE
VITA LIS. M. S. F.
VITALIS. M. S. FECIT
VITALIS. PP
VITINVS. F
Q. VO
Q. VOVO
VOCEV. F
VOSIICVNNVS
VNICVS. F
VRNINI
VRSVLVS. FE
VSTI. MA
VXMLIM
VXOPILLI. M
XANTHl
XIVI
XViNX
Z
ZAPEPIDIV
ZOIL
ZOLVS
. . RVIL LV F
OIVNV
POTTERS' MARKS ON MORTARIA.
ALBTNVS
ALBINVS. FECIT
APBILIS
ANDON
P. ARVA
ANDID. FECIT
AMMIVS
BRIXSA
CAS . . .
CATVLVS. F
CIKEKOFNS
CKICIR. OF
DEVA . . .
DVBITATVS
DOINV
DO . . .
EOAB
ESVNERT
Q. VALKKI
GATTIV.>
MANSINVS
LICINIL » S
LITVCEM
LVGVDI. i;
rOTTERS' xMARKS.
WJ
I.VGVDVS. FACTVS
T.VGVDV
F. LVGVDV
LVGVDV. FACTV
L. E. ECIT
M AKIN VS. FECIT
MARTIN VS. F
MATVCKNVS
MATVSEXS. F
MAXI
FRASSO. OF
PRIMVS, F
L. LVRIVP. niiscvs
P. P. R
P. R. B
POTATICVS. FE
Q. S. D
RIDANVS
KID AN VS. M
RIPANI
RIPANVS TIHKR. F
A. TEREX
RIPANI
RVCCVS
SAVRANVS
SATVRNIXVS
SATYRNINVS. FEC
Q. VA. SE
L. CAN. bfiO
6ECVNDVS
SOLLVS
SOLLVS. F
TANK)
SEX. VAL
Q. VALC. F
VERANI. F
Q. VALERI.
ESVNERTI
Q. VALERIVS
; VERANIVS
T . . . S. VALEN
VIALLA
POTTERS' MARKS ON THE HANDLES OF AMPHOR.li.
A. A. F
AERI
C. F. AI
C. AZ.
AXII
BELLVCI
L. VI. Rll
C.
C. IV. R
C. V. H
L. CES
C. AP. F
CRADOS
CARTVNIT. M (!')
CORI
F. C. CVFIA
L. F. CRESCIV. FE (?)
EIPC
EROV. IF
FAVSTI. MAN IB
GMT.
G. S. A.
HILARI
L. A. GE
L. C. F. P. C. O
IIVN. (r) MKLISSAE
MELISSE
L. IVNI (r)
MELISSI
MAMILI (?)
MELISSI
M. P. R
MCC
MIM
NYMPH
P. S. A
POR. L. AN
Q. S. P
CAT. QVIE
CANTON. GV
CANTON. QV. ET
CANT. QVESI (?)
QIMFN
ROMANI
L. V. ROPI. M
RVFSANI
SAENAS
OF. SANI
SCALENS
L. SER SENC
C. SEMPOL
L. S. SEX
L. C. SOL
C. MARI. STIL
S. VENNR
VALERI
VENVSTI
VIBIOR
S. VENN'S
INDEX.
A.
Aballnba [IVatch-cross), 158
Ahoiia {JBitton), 169
AcHs, 393
Ad Abonam {Bitton), 109
Ad Abum {JFintcrton), 152
Ad Alaunam [Lancaster) 164
Ad Alpes Penninos, 16 i
Ad Ansaiii (Stratford), 160
Ad Autonani, 165
Ad Aquas {Wells), 168
Ad Decimuni, 169
Ad Fines, [Bronghing), 150
Ad Lapidem {S to/wham), 167
Ad Leraanura {on tlie Lxjmiie), 170
Ad l^etuariam [BrougJt), 153
Ad Pontera [Farndon), 152
Ad Sabrinam [Sea Mills), 169
Ad Tisam, 154
Ad Trajectuin [Severn sid^), 169
Ad Trivonam [Burg), 165
Ad Uxellam [Bridgetvater), 168
Ad Yigesinium [Castle Fle/iiish),
162
Adminius, a British prince, 41, 43
JSi-atus, 18
.Es, 18, 19
^■Elia Castra [Alcester), 166
^EUa, the leader ot the West
Saxons, 457
JEquipondium, 413
^•Esc, king of Kent, 456
^•Esculapius, worship of, 325
..Escwine, king of the East Saxons,
•±59
^sica [Great Chester!<), 1'^. 214
.Etius, letter cl iU Bvitons to,
451
Ago, average of the Romans in
IBritain, 385
Agelocuni [Littlchorough), 152
Agger, 222
Agminales, 223
Agricola, Julius, 57 — 60
Agriculture, state of, under the
Pomans, 255 — 257
Akeman-street, 524
Akemannes-ceaster [Bath), 524
Alauna [Alcester), 165
Alauna [Lancaster), 164
Alauna (Kier), 123, 155
Alhani [Scottish tribe), 63
Albinus, Decimus Clodius, 128 —
131
Alcluyd [Dumbarton), 526
Aldermen, 510
Aliona [WJiitley Castle), 158
Allectus, his usurpation, 142
Alon« [Ambleside), 164
Altars, Eonian, 316—320
Amber, use of, and superstitions
connected with, among the
Anglo-Saxons, 489
Araboglanna [Birdostcald), 158
AmOrosius Aurelianus, 455
Amphitheatres, Ponian, 212
Amphoric, 280, 403, used for
cofhns, 365
Ampulla, 363, 403
Ancjilites [People (f Bahshiref),
34
INDEX.
5.^1
Aiicastn, a goddess \voi-s!iip[)cd in
Koiuun liritilin, 'Sol
Aiiderida {Pevoiscy), 169
Amlredes-cejister [recenscy), 4o8
Audredes-leah [tiUca Auckridd),
4.37
Angles, 45o
Anglo-Saxons, their mode of snt-
tling on tlie conquered lands,
505, prejudiced against set-
tling in towns, 507
Animal remains found near Pto-
mari sites, 405
Ansa, 413
Antivesta3Uin {tJie LcnuVs End), 61
Antoninus ]*ius, 126
Antoninus, Itinerary of, 146, 531
Antonii.Lb J waT., J27, 133
A[)(dl(), worship of, 322, 324
A(pi;ie Calida?, Aqiuc Solis {Bath),
68, 121, 210
Arcani, agents employed in Bri-
tain, 443
Arciaconus, a deity worshipped
in lloiiian Britain, 351
Ariconium [Weston), 161
ArniilUe, 393
Armour, Roman, 414, Anglo-
Saxon, 470, 471
Arrow-heads of stone, 96 ; Anglo-
Saxon, 474
Astarte, worship of, 325
Athelbert beconics king of Kent,
457; converted to Christi-
anity, 462, 463
Attacotti {Scottish tribe), 63, 139,
441
Attrebates (Berkshire), 62
Augustine, St., the apostle of the
Anglo-Saxons, 462
Auteri {Irish tribe), 64
Avebury, British circles at, 83
Avisford, in Sussex, remarkable
llonian tomb found there, 364,
387
Axe, Anglo-Saxon war-axe, 477
Axelodununi [Bowness), 158
B.
Banatia [Bonness), 123
Banchorium {Fxnif/or), 163
Bancorna-byrig [Bangor Iscoed),
527
Banna, a Boman town near ILi-
drian's Wall, 257
Barrows, or seijulchral mounds,
70, 71, 86; Boiuan, 377, 378;
Ando- Saxon, 467, 469
Barth)w hills, 377
Hasilica, Boman, 211
Bathan-ceaster {Bath) 459
I Baths, in lloman houses, 19i),
2G0 ; public, 211, 212, 414
I Beads, Ilt.man, 287, 288 ; Anglo-
I Saxon, 486, 489
, Bebban-byrig ( Bamborongh), built,
459
ReLitucadrns, a ^od Avorsbipped
in lloman Britnin, 349
Belg;e [Hants, ITilts, and So'nc-'--
set), 25, 43, 61
Bells, Roman, 405
Bennaventa [Barroiv Hill), 149
iienonii; [High Cross), 149
Beorh, beorg, bearw, 467
Beowulf, the Anglo-Saxon poem
of, 466
Bericus, a 15ritish prince. 40, 42
Bernic'ia, kingdom of, 456
Bibracte, 161
Bibroci [People of Sassca:), 34
Bignor, Roman villa at, 243
Bilanx, 413
Blanii [Irish tribe), 64
Blatuin Bulgium {Middlebg), 156
Blestium [Monniotith), 161
Boadicea, 51 — o-i
Bolanus, Vettius, 56
Boh-rium {the lattd' s End), 61
Bollivi, 510
Boni homines, 510
Bonus Eventus worshipped, 233,
337
Borcovicus [Hoascsteads), 158,
316
Bos loiigifrons, 404
liovium [Bangor), 163
Bovium {EtveiDig), 162
Bowls, Anglo-Saxon, 499
Box, branches ;ind leaves of, l)u-
ried with the dead by tlie
Romans, 387, 388
Bracca), 65
552
IXDEX.
]5i*aciaca, nn epithet of Mars, 310
l^rannof^eniiini [Leintwardine), 122
l^raviiiiiim (Lrii/tiotrrdiiic), 168
liremenium [Hiyh Rochester), 123,
155
Bremetenraoum [Brampton), 15S
lirenietonacic {Orcrhorou(jh), 1H4
Bricks or tiles, Rom an, 183, ISl
])ridges. Roman, 225
IJiigantes [North of England), 45,
62, 126
Erigantes [Irish tribe), 64
]irioaiitia, the goddess, 351
Brigis, or Brige [BroagJiton), 1G7
Brinavaj [Black-ground], 166
Biitain, description of, by C.esar,
36 ; by Strabo and Diodorus, 37
liritannia, tlie goddess, 333
Britons, their condition and man-
ners, 37, 65 ; serving as aux-
iliaries abroad, 139
Brocavium (fi rough an/), 155
Bronze, age, 2 ; swords, 5 — 18,
101 ; coins, 14, 16 ; spear-
lieads, 15; daggers, 15, 103;
primary origin of, 16 ; armoin-,
18; weapons, 19; Celts, 20;
instruments made of, 95 ; Bo-
man manufactures iu, 9, 19,
22, 297
Bronzes, Roman, 408
]5rovonaCiB [Kirbg Tliore), 155
J^uckets, Anglo-Saxon, 499
]*ullieum, sec Burrium
Jiargwara, 514, 517
Burrium [Usk), 122, 161, 139
liastum, o6t)
Cacr, 526
Caer-Legion [Caerlon), 527
Caer-Luel [Carlisle) 526
Caer-Marddyn [Caer mar then), 527
Caer-Seiont, 527
Caer-AVent, 527
Ciesar, Julius, invades Britair, 28;
his second invasion. 30
Cfcsaromagus [Chelmsford), 159
(.'aims, 77
T'alcaria [Tadcaster), 152, 213
ValccKS, calceamentum, 398
Caledonia Svlva, 63
Caledonii [Scottish tribe), 18, 59,
63, 131
Caliga, 396
Caligula marches to the coast of
Gaul, 41
Calleva [Silchester), 122, 161
(lambodununi [Slack], 122, 164
Cainboricum [Cambridge], 160
Caniulodununi [Colcltester), 41,
43, 45, 52, 122, 159
Camunlodunum, see Cambodu-
num.
Candelabrum, 407
Cangi, 45, 62
Canonium [Relredon], 159
CiintiC [Scottish tribe), 63
Canterbury, its municipal condi-
tion under the Anglo-Saxons,
510
Cantii [tribe inhabiting Kent), 37,
61
Cantwara byrig [Canterbury), 457
Capulus, 409
Caput stater a;, 413
Caracalla, 11, 133, 137
Caractacus, 40, 45
('aransius assumes the empire,
139; his coins, 140; mur-
dered, 142
Carbantorigum [Kirkcudbright),
123
Carnabii [Scottish tribe), 63
Carnonacffi [Scottish tribe], 63
Carngdd, 77
Cartismandua, 47, 48, 57
Cassi [Hertfordshire], 34, 62
Cassivellaunus, 31, 34
Castra Exploratorum [Netherbg],
156
Cataracto, or Cataractonium [Cut-
ter ick], 122, 154
Catini [Scottish tribe], 63
Catus Bccianus, 52
Catyeuchlani [Buckingham, Bed-
ford, and Hertford), 62
Cauci [Irish tribe), 64
Cauponce, caupones, 223
Cansenna) [Ancaster), 151
Caves, habitations in, 115, 118
Ceajius, a deity worshipped in
lloman Britain, 351
Ceaster, 526
I
IXDEX.
OO.i
Ceawlin, king of the West Saxons,
459
Celtic tribes, their origin and
movement, 23
Celtis, 10
Celts, instruments so called, 8, 10,
16, 20, 98
Cemeteries, lloman, 213
Cenia {the Fal), 168
Cenimagni [tJie people of Suffolk),
39
Cenotaph, Anglo-Saxon, 367, 368,
469
Centnim staterce, 413
Centurial stones, 418, 420
Ccrdic, king of the West Saxons,
458
Cerealis, Petilius, 53, 57
Ceres, worship of, 321
Cerones {Scottish tribe), 63
Chatelaine of the Anglo-Saxon
ladies, 489
Christianity, its establishment in
lloman Britain questioned,
353, 356 ; among the AVelsh,
_ 527
Cilurnum {Chcsters), 137, 157,
210, 328, 338, 418
Circii/us, 413
Circles of stones, 79, 83
Cissan-ceastcr {Chichester), 453
Cities of Britain, their condition
when the Homan legions left
the island. 451
Cioitas, 426, 427, 428, 510
Classicianus, Julius, 56
Claudius, his expedition to Bri-
tain, 42
Clausentum {Bitten)), 167, 351,
422, 431
Cnut, king, deceives the citizens
of Tjondon, 518
Coal, Kimnieridge, 290, mineral,
used as fuel by the Romans,
292
Cocci um {Ribchester), 164, 210,
336
Cochlear, 410
Cocidius, a god worsliipped in
lloman Britain, 350
Cogidubnus, or Cogidunus, 51
Coiiiiige, Koman, 14, 15 ; British,
40
Coins, British, 109, 112; Ronuin
plated, 431; for>>ed, 432;
coins relating to Britain, 435 ;
modes in which they were
hoarded up, 436, 437 ; pro-
portional numbers in which
lloman coins are found, 438,
439; Anglo-Saxon, 501
Colania [Corstairs, or Lanark),
123, 156
Collegia, 427
Colonia, 426
Colonies, Roman, 296
Colani, cola niraria, 402
Coinbretonium {Utof/h), IGO
Combs, Roman, 398; Ang'o-
Saxon, 492
Comius, a British prince, 40
Commius, the Attrebatiau, 27, 29,
30, 35
Cominodus, 128
Compasses, Roman, 412
Condate {Kinderton), 163
Condercum, {Benwell), 210, Z'^/),
348
Congavata, 158
Connabium, 428
Conovium {Caer Jiitii), 163
Constans visits Britain, 143
Constantino the Great, 143
Constantino, the usuri)er, his his-
tory, 449, 450
Constantius, marches against Ca-
rausius and Allectns, 142
Copper, found in Britain, 22
Corbridge lanx, 326
Corda {Birrensworh), 123
Coria, 123
Coiinium {Cirencester), 122, 161.
168
Corioudi {Irish tribe), 64
Coritavi {Northampton, Leicester,
lintUoid, Derby, Nottingham,
Lincoln), 61
Cornabii ( IFariviek, iroreesftr,
Stafford, Salop, Cheshire), 62
Corn-woalas, 525
Corstopitun\ {Corchester, Cor-
bridge), 154, 325
Costume of the Romans, 391
Cowey Stakes, 36
Cowries found in Anglo-S.ixon
graves, 4iy2
5rA
INDEX.
Crassus, Publius, 2-t
Ci'eoiies {Scoftiah tribe), 63
Crococolaiia {Bro/ir/h), 152
(Cromlechs, 72—77; their position,
83—86; age of, 106, 107
Crvptoporticus, in Roman villas,
' 240, 2-13
Culinary utensils, Roman, 401, 403
Caltn; 314, 409
Cumbria, kingdom of, 526
Cunetio {Foil;/ Farm), 161)
Cnnobeline, 40, 41
Curator viartim, 223
Caria {Cnrrii'), 123, 155
Curia, 426, 509
Ciiriales, 426, 509
Cynric, king of the AVest Saxons,
459
Cyrcn-ceastcr [Cirencester), 459
D.
Da^'gers, early bronze, 15, 16
Damiiii (a Scottish tribe), 63, 123
Damnonii {Devon and Cor/nvali),
43, 63
Daiiuni [Boncaster), 152
Darini [Irish tribe), 64
Decianus, Catns, 52
J)ecuriones, 426
J)efe)isor civitatis, 427, 509
Dt'ira, kingdom of, 456
Delgovitia {site uncertain), 153
iJenietcB {Welsh tribe), 62
Derventio {Old Malton), 153
Derventio {Little Chester), 165
Deva {Chester), 123, 163
Devana {Old Aberdeoi), 123
Diana, worship of, 320
Dicalidones {a Scottish tribe), 441
Dichus Gallus, Avitus, 47
Diploinata, 223
JJiversoria, diver sores, 223
Dobnni {Gloucester and Oxford),
42, 62
Di)gs, British, 38, 257, 558
Dolicliene, Jupiter, 316
Dolmen, 72
Dorocina {Dorchester, Oxf.), 166
Dover, its municipal privileges
under the Anglo-Saxons, 51 L
Drift, geological formation, 1
Drinking-glasscs, Anglo-Saxon,
495
Droit de gite, 511
Druids, their political faction in
Gaul, 27 ; retire to Anglesea,
49; their system and worship,
66—69
Druids' circles, 79
Druids' beads, 288
Dubnx) {Dover), 146, 170, 184
Duninm {Dorchester), 121
Durius {the Dart), 167
Durnovaria {Dorchester), 121, 167
Durotriges {Dorset), 61, 121
Durobriv;e (liochester), 14!), 360
Durobrivte {Castor), 151, 210
DurocobriviB {Dunstable), 148
Durolevuin {Davinffton), 146
Durolipons {Godmanchestcr), 150,
160
Durolitum, or Durositimi {Ho/n-
ford), 159
Ourovernum {Canterbury), 121,
146, 457
Duumviri, 426, 510
E.
East-Anglia, kingdom of, founded,
459; the East- Angles con-
verted to Christianity, 463
Eastlow hill, in Suffolk, a remark-
able barrow opened by Pro-
fessor Henslow, 377
East-Saxons converted to Ciiristi-
anity, 463
Eblani {Irish tribe), 64
Eburacum {York), 122, 133, 136
152, 153,456
Echcvins, 510
Elauna, the goddess, 352
EUebri {Irish tribe), 64
Ensis, 19
Eofor-wic {Yorlc), 456
Epiacuin {Lanchester), 122, 151,
21)3
Epidii {Scottish tribe), 63
Fpistomiiim, 404
Kpona, the goddess, 338
Eppillus, a liritisb prince, 43
Erdini {Irish tribe) 64
Ermyn Street, 523
INDEX.
bob
Erpeditani [Irish trihe) 64
Kteocetum [IVall), 149, 164
Eustache, Count of Boulogne, his
quarrel with the burghers of
Dover, 511
Exeter, its position under the
Anglo-Saxons, ol3
Exan-ceaster [Exeter), b27
F.
Eanum Cocidis [near Bankshead).,
350
Ferrnm, 19, 21
Fibuhe, lioinan, 392 ; Anglo-
Saxon, 478, 484
Fire-dogs, lloman, found in
Britain, 401
Fire-places, Boinan, 401
I'liiit im[)lenients, 1
Flora, coin representing the god-
dess, 14
Focus, 314, 401
Forfex, 408
Forgeries of Eoman coins, 432,
434
F'irks, Roman, 410
Fortune, worship of, 336, 337
Forum Dianas [Dunstable), 148
Frontinus, Julius, 57
Fahjur divom, 389
G.
Gabrosenta) [Burgh-upon- Sands),
158
Gadeni [Cumberland and Scott is/'
hordes), 64, 351
Gagates, or jet, 289, 290
Galacum [near Kendal), 122, 164
Galava [Kesivick), 164
Galgacus, 17, 60
G algal, 77
Gallus, Avitus Didius, 47
Gangani [Irish tribe), 64
Gariannonum [BurgJt, Castle), 448
Genii, worship of the, 329, 331,
333
Gerontius, Count, 449
Gessoriacum [Boulogne), 28, 139,
142
Gildas, his legendary history, 452
— 455
Gladius, 19
Glanovanta, 159
Glass, Eoman, 282 ; manufactured
at Brighton, 283 ; difi'ereut
articles made of it, 284, 287 ;
Anglo-Saxon glass, 495 ; Ger-
man-Saxon glass, 497
Glass windows in lloman houses,
205
Gleow-ceaster [Gloucester), 459
(ilevum [Gloucester), 161
Gobauniuin [Abergavenny), 163,
169
Gold found in Britain, 296
Goldsmiths, skill of the Anglo-
Saxon, 486
Goldsmith's sign at Old Maltoii,
304
Government, Roman, in Britain,
416
Governors of Roman Britain —
Froprcetors :
Aulas riautius, 42, 424
Ostorius Scapula, 44
Avitus Didius Gallus, 47
Veranius, 49
Cains Suetonius Paulliaus, 49
Petronius Turpilianus, 56
Trebellius Maximus, 56
Vettius Bolanus, 56
Petilius Cerealis, 57
Julius Frontinus, 57
Julius Agricola, 57 — 60
Sallustius LucuUus, 124
Julius Severus, 126
Prisons Lieinius, 126, 424
J.ollius Urbicus, 126, 424
Platorius Nepos, 424
Aufidius Yictorinus, 127
C. Valerius Pansa, 424
Ul'pius Marcellus, 127
Perennis, 127
I'ublius Helvins Pertinax, 128
Decimus Clodius Albinus, \2'6
Yirius Lupus, 131, 336, 424
Chiudius Xenophon, 425
Marius Yalerianus, 137, 425
MiBcelius Fuscus, 425
Guicus Lucilianus, 425
C'laudius Panlinus, 425
Nonnius Philippus, 137, 425
o56
INDEX.
Governors {continued) —
Vicarii :
Martin, 144
Alvpius, 440
Civilis, 441, 442
Chrysanthus, 447
Gratian, a British usurper, 448
Gregory, Pope, undertakes the
coiiversiou of the Anglo-
Saxons, 461
H.
Ilahitancum {Risingham), 154,
337, 420
Hadrian in Britain, 124
Hadrian's wall, 125, 156, 157, 210
Hair-pins, Roman, 393 ; Anglo-
Saxon, 485
11 am, 505
Hammia, a goddess worshipped
in Roman Britain, 352
Hariinella, a goddess, 352
Hengest and Horsa arrive in Kent,
455 — 457
Herculentus, the god, 352
Hercules, worship of, 325
Heriri Mons [Snowdon), 150
Hibernia {Ireland), invaded by
the Romans, 61 : description
of, by Ptolemy, 64
Himilco, the Carthaginian, 25
]Ioly Promontory {Carnsore
Point), 64
Honorius, the emperor, gives li-
berty to thecitiesof Britain, 451
Horestii {Scottish tribe), 63
Household gods of the Romans,
407
Houses, Roman, 187—199
Hrofes-ceaster,(72wc//<?.s7<;r),457, 511
Hunnum {Halton-clieNters), 157,
213, 389, 419
Huscarles, 513, 518
Hypocausts in Roman houses, 196,
199
I.
Iconi {Snffolk, Norfolk, Cambridge^
and liantingdon), 44, 61
Iciani {IcIcUngham), 160, 508
Ictis {the Isle of Wight), 2o
Ida, king of Northumbria, 459
J erne, 25
Iknield Street, 523
Imanueiitius, king of the Trine-
bantes, 31
\\\ Medio, 153
Inscriptions, on Roman coins, 14 ;
in Roman villas, 245, 254 ;
on drinking vessels, 286 ; on a
Roman pig of copper, 291 ; on
pigs of lead, 294, 295 , on
silver, 296 ; on medicine
stamps, 299, 303 ; on signs,
304 ; on roundels at Colches-
ter, 312; on altars, 314—352;
sepulchral inscriptions, 378 —
387 ; centurial stones, 418,
419; early inscriptions to the
emperors, 420—423; to muni-
cipal officers, 427 ; sepulchral
inscriptions found in Cornwall
and Wales, 528, 529
Iron, swords, 7, 19; early use of,
17, 22 ; procured in Britain,
37 ; manufacture under the
Romans, 291—294
Isannavaria {Burnt Walls), 149
Isca Dumnoniorum {Exeter), 121,
167
Isca Silurnm {Cuerleon), 48, 122,
162, 169
Isclialis {Ilchester), 121, 168
Isimee {Ancaster), 151
Isurium {Aldborough), 122, 154,
213, 225, 404
Itiuinaries, Roman, 145, 182, 166,
527, 528
I tuna {Solwag Firth), 158
Iveiiii {Irish tribe), 64
J.
.fewellery, Anglo-Saxon, 485, 4SC
Juuantes, 61
Julianus, Didius, 128
•lupiter, worship of, 315—318
Jutes, 455, 506
K.
Kent, kingdom of, founded, 4 36
INDEX.
55]
Kevs, Roman, 339 ; Anglo-Saxon,
'490, 491
Kimmeridg-e coal, ornaments made
of, 288
Kisi-vaen, 72
Knives, Koman, 409 ; Anglo-
Saxon, 474, 489
]..
Lachrymatories, 284
Laconicum, 236
Lactodorum [Towcester), 15 1
Lamps, Roman, 406, 407
Lamps placed in Roman graves,
363
Lancida, 413
Lares, 407
Lavatrai {Bowes), loo, 336, 42o
J^ead, manutacturt'S in, in Roman
Britain, 294; leaden coffins
found in Roman cemeteries, 368
Legions, Romifli, in Britain, 123,
448
Legiolinm [Castleford), 152
Lemanis Tortus [Lyiunc], 146, 170
Leucarum [Llt/cliwr), 162
Libra, 413
Liehavens, 74
liicinius I'riscus, 126
Ligula, 410, 411
Lightning, people killed by,
buried on the s'3ot, 389
Lindum (Lincoln), 122, 151
Lindum [Ardoch), 123, 155
Locks, Roman, 399, 400
Logi [Scottish tribe), 63
Londinium {Loudon), 53, 121, 147,
148 ; the residence of the
propra)tor, 185
London, its municipal history
under the Anglo-Saxons, 514—
517
Low, 70, 79, 467
Tjucerna, 406
Lucius, king, a fabulous person-
age, 354, 355
Lucopibiii {IFhifhern), 122
Lucnllus, Sallustius, 124
Luentinnm {Llanio), 122, 169
Luguhallium, Luguvallium [Car-
llsk), 155, 158
Lundenwic {London), 515
Lupicinus, 144
liUpus, Virius, 131
Lutudarum {Chesterfield), 166
M.
MuGcUffi [a northern tribe), 131
Madus {Medway), 146
Magiovintuin {Fenny Stratford),
151
Magna {Kenchester), 163, 299
Magna {Carvoran), 158, 321, 349
Magnatae {Lrish tribe), 64
Magnentius, 144
Mais, a town near Hadrian's wall,
257
Maiicipes, 223
Mancunium {Manchester), 164
Mandubratius, ciiief of the Trino-
bantes, 31, 33
Manduessedum {Ma)iceter), 149
Mansiones, 223
Maponus, a god worshipped in
Roman Britain, 352
Marcellus, Ulpius, 127
Marcus, a British usurper, 448
Margidunum {Bridgeford), 152
Maridunum {Caermartheu), 122,
162
Mars, worship of, 318
Martin, governor of Hritain, 144
Masonry, Roman, characteristics
of, 179—191
Matres deae, worship of the, 338 ;
traces of, in the middle ages,
338 — 315; Roman altars in
Britain dedicated to, 345 — 347
Matunus, a god worshipped in
Roman Britain, 352
Maurusius, Victorinus, 138
Maximus, Magnus, his revolt and
usurpation, 445 ; his death,
447 ; fables connected w.th
him, 447
Medicine stamps, Roman, 299,
304
Mediolanum {Chesterton), 164
Mediolanum {on the Tanud), 122,
150
Menapia {St. David's), 162
Menapii {Lrish tribe), G4
5.j8
IXDEX.
MiUihir, 74, 82
jNIorcia, kingdom ot, 460, 4G3
Mercury, worship of, 322
Mertie [Scottish tribe), 63
Middle Angles converted to Chris-
tianity, 463
Mile-stones, Roman, 224 ; length
ot the lioraan mile, 225
jNIilitary force in Britain under the
Romans, 418
MiUiariuin, 223, 421
jNlinerva, Avorship of, 320
3Iiuimi, 115, 501 — 503
jMint, Roman, in Britain, 430
Mirrors, Roman, 398
Missio, 428
jMistletoe, a sacred plant among
the Druids, 69
]\Iithras, Avurship of, 326—329
Mugontis, a god worshipped in
Jiritain, 350
Mona {Ajtglesea) 49, 62
jNIoney, see Coins.
Mons Heriri [Si/owdon), 150
Morbium [Temple-boroug]i), 166
Moridunum {Honiton ?), 167
Mortar, Roman, 189
Mortaria, Roman, 280, 403
Miicfoues, 17
Jfunicipia, 425, 426, 510
jMunuces-ceaster [Newcastle), 456
Jliitationes, 223
N.
Xuils in the Roman sandals, 397
Nasica, Csesius, 48
Needles, Roman, 408
Xidum [Neath), 162, 527
Xiger, Pescennius, 128
Northumbrians converted to Chris-
tianity, 463
Notitia Imperii, 416
Novantes (« Scottish tribe), 63
Noviomagus [Holwood hill), 121
147
Nucleus, 221
Numeii, nuinina, 311, 335
Nymphs, worship of the, 330
. . 0.
Octopltarum Promontorium, 163
Oculists' stamps, Roman, 200 —
303
Officials, Roman, in Britain, 417,
418
Olenacum [Old Carlisle), 159
Olicami [IlJdey), 122, 164
Olla, 403
Ordovices [North Wales), 45, 57,
62
Orestii, see Horestii.
Orrea [Bertha), 123, 155
Ostorius Scapula, 44
Otadeni [JNorthiimberland and
South of Scotland), 62
Othona [Ythanceaster), 448
Oysters, British, 120
Oyster-shells found on Roman
sites, 404
Parisii [Yorkshire), 61
Patera, 314
PauUmus, Cains Suetonius, 49, 56
Paulus Catena, 144
Pavements, tesselated, 230, 246 — ■
254
Tavimentum, 221
Fecten, 398
Penates, 407
Pcnuocrucium [on the Poilc), 149
Perennis, 127
Periods, divisitm of pre-historic
times into, 2, 5
Pertinax, 128
Petriana [Cambeck Fort), 158, 210
Petronius rnrpilianus, ii(j
Petuaria, 122, 153, 316
Peulvan, 74, 82
Philippus, Nonnius, 137
Picts and Scots, 139, 44 i, 454
Planets, deities of the, 322
Plautius, Aulus, 42, 44
Plebs, 427
I'olybius, anecdote by, 17
Polycletus, 56
Pons ^lii [Neivcastle), loo, 157
Pontes [Staines), 161
Population of Roman Britain, its
character, 306
Portus Leraanis(Z^;»?it'), 146, 170,
404
INDEX.
5o<i
I'drtus iMa^^nus [Portchefiter), 1G9
I'ortus Sistuntionini [Fnxklcton],
164
Totters' marks, 275, o41 — oiO
Tottery, British, 93 ; lloinan,
made in the Upcluirch marshes,
260 ; at Duvobriv;u, 263 ; pot-
ters' kilns, 264; Samian ware,
269—276 ; other varieties of
Roman potteries, 277 ; Ang'lo-
Saxon, 493, 494; Germnn-
Saxon, 494, 498; Frankish,
498
Prcefecti, 510
Frcefericiduiit, 314
Frcepositus regis, 521
Tne tori urn {Flamhoroitcjh Head /),
153
Trasutagus, 51
Prliicipales, 426, 510
Prohi homines, 510
]^rocolitia [CarrauhxrgJt), 158
]*ropnBtors of liritain, see Go-
vernors.
Trovince, Roman, its constitution
and divisions, 416
Tteroton Castrum {BurgheacV), 123
I'tolerav's account of Britain, 61
Pa)icta stater ce, 413
VnticHli, 389
Pijra, 358
Q.
Uuorns, for grinding corn, 404
R.
Ritix; {Leicester), 122, 151
Ravenna, anonymous geographer
of, 145 ; his list of Roman
towns in Britain, 257, 537
Peeves, 510, 515, 521
Regni {Sussex and Surrei/), 61
Regnntn {Chichester), 51, 210
Regulbium {Reculver), 146, 410
Retigonium [Stranraer), 122
Ricagm . . ., a goddess w(n-shipped
in Roman Britain, 352
Ricliard of Cirencester, 145, 533 ;
his Itinerary, 527
Rigodunum [Coccium], 122
Kings, Roman, 393
Roads, Roman, construction of,
221—223; adopted by the
Anglo-Saxons, 522 — 524
Robogdii [Irish trihe), 64
Rochester, its municipal privilog(\s
under the Anglo-Saxons, 511
Rocking-stones, 84
Pogus, 358
i^oofs of Roman houses, 206
Roundels, inscribed, found at Col-
chester, 311
Rubbish pits attached to Roman
towns, 215
Rudge cup, 257
Pudus, ruder atio, 221
Rutuniura {Poivton), 150, 163
Rutupia3 {Pichborough), 120, 121,
146
Ryknield Street, 523
S.
Salinaj [Broitwich), 164
Salime of Ttolemy, 122, 165
Salt- ways, the roads so called, 524
Samian ware, 269 — 275
Sandals, Roman, 396, 397
Sarabus sinus, Neptune so callrd,
352
Sarcophagi of stone at York, 3()3
Saxonicuni littus, 451
Saxons, invasion of the, 452, 455 —
459
Scabini, 510
Scales, Roman, 413
Scapula, Ostorius, 44
Sceat, sceattas, 503
Scissors, Roman, 408 ; Anglo-
Sax(m, 490
Scopus stater cc, 413
Scots, 139
Scowles, 292
Sculptures on stone, 12, 13
Searo-byrig [Old Sariim), 459
Seaxas, 474
S'curis, 314
Segedunum [IFallsotd), 157
Segelocum [Littleborough), 152
Segontiaci [Hampshire and Pertcs),
34
5oO
IXDEX.
Seijontium {Cacr Seinnt), 150, 163
Sclgovie {<i Scotcis/i trc/tc), 63
iSL'pulchre, uiodes of, iiinon^' t.lie Ro-
mans, 357 — 360 ; articles buried
with the dead, 363 ; rites of,
among- the Aiiy;lo-Saxons, 456
Sera pensilis, 40 1
Seiapis, worship of, 329
Sestuiitii ( fFe-sijnorelu/id and C'ujn-
berliind), iSl
Setlocenia, a <;-oddess worshipped
in Roman Ijritaiii, 352
Severiis, tlie emperor, 129 ; pro-
ceeds to Britain, 133 ; estab-
lishes liis court at Eburacum,
133 ; his canip;ii<i,ns against the
Caledonians, 134; dies at York,
136
Severus, Julius, 126
Severus, Junius, 128
Shields, Anglo-Saxon, 475
Sifjna, 322
Silures [border of Wales), 45, 47,
57, 62, 65
Silvanus, worship of, 257, 324
Silver, found in Britain, 295
Sitomagus {Dunwich), 160
Slaves, traffic in, among the Saxons,
461 ; sold in London, 515
Slaves, immolated at the burial of
their chiefs by the Anglo-
Saxons, 469
Sorbiodunum {Old Sarum), 167
South-Saxons, kingdom of the,
founded, 458
Snails found on Roman sites, 404 ;
snail shells found in Anglo-
Saxon barrows, 492
Spears, Anglo-Saxon, 21, 474
Speculum, 398
Spinas {Spee/i), IGl, 168
Spoons, lioman, 410
Spurs, Roman and Saxon, 415
Standard, lioman, found near
Stonev-Siratford, 415
Stater.(, 412, 413
Statores, 223
Statnmen, 221, 223
Steel for sharpening knives, Ro-
man, 410
Steelyards, Roman, 413
tiiepeudiarice civitafos, 426
Stone, early use of, 4, 5 ; sculp-
tures, 12, 13 ; implements, 95
—98
Stonehenge, 79, 83, 85, 108
Strathcluyd, kingdom of, 526
Street, 523
Strigils, 413
Sturius [the Stonr), 160
Stylus, 411
Suetonius Paiillinus, Caius, 49, 56
SuUoniacae {Urockky Hill), 148
Summum djrsum, sainnia orasta,
222
Superstitions connected with nn-
cient monuments, 85, 86, 105
Swegen, king, liis death, 520
Swords, bronze, 5, 20 ; iron, 7, 19;
characteristics of Roman, 7 —
14; on coins, 14; used by the
Gauls, Romans and Britons,
17 ; British or Roman, 101,
102 ; Anglo-Saxon, 21, 470—
474
Syria dea, worship of the, 322
Taberiifc. dirersoricc 223
Tabula, 411
TabuUe honestcc missionis, 429
Taixali {Scottish tribe), 63
Tamara {on the Tamar), 121, 168
Tames is {Sinodun Hill ?), 166
Tamia {Braemar Castle), 123
Tasciovanus, 40
Tcgida, 363
Terra-cottas, Roman, 281
Tertiance decc, 338
Testudo, 30
Tetricus, 138
Theatres, Roman, 212
Theodosia {Dumbarton), 156
Theodosius takes the command in
Britain, 441
Thetford, the townsmen of, kill
their abbot, 513
Tibia {the Taaf), 162
Tiles, Roman, 183
Tin, procured from Biitain, 24, 25
Tine . . . , a British prince, 40
Tintinnabulum, 405
Tisa {the Tees), 154
Titus, the emperor, 42
A
INDEX.
561
Togodumnus, a British prince, 40,
43
Tombs, Roman, made of tiles, 360
Torques, torquis, 394 ; torquin bra-
chialis, 395
Town, Roman, description ot a,
171; its walls, 172; gates,
174 ; houses, 187 ; streets, 207 ;
public buildings, 210 ; suburbs,
212; drainage, 213
Towns, municipal, under the Ro-
mans, 425 ; preserved under
the Anglo-Saxons, 508 ; exam-
ples, Canterbury, 510; Roches-
ter and Dover, 511 ; Thetford,
"Worcester, Exeter, 513 ; Lon-
don, 514 — 519; charters grant-
ed to towns, 520
Trebellius Maximus, 56
Trebonius, Caius, 32
Triliths,^ 74
Trimontium {Eildon), 123, 155
Trinobantes [the people of Essex),
31, 61
Tripontium [Dove Bridge), 149,
151
TrtM, or trulla, 403
Triitina, 413
Tuesis [Gromdale), 123
Tumblers (origin of the word), 495
Tumulus, 71
Tun, 505
Tunnocelum [Drumburgh), 158
Turpilianus, Petronius, 56
Tweezers, Roman, 399 ; Anglo-
Saxon, 490
U.
Urbicus, Lollius, 126, 127
Uriconium [Wroxeter), 122, 149,
163, 212, 301
Urns, sepulchral, Roman, 359 ;
Anglo-Saxon, 493
Usdioe [Irish tribe), 64
Ustrinum, 358
Uxaconium [Red-hilL or Oaken-
gates), 149
Uxela {Bridgewater), 121
Uxelum {Raeburnfoot, or Castle-
cver), 123, 156
Vacomagi {Scottish, tribe), 63
Vagniacae {8outhjieet), 147
Valentinus, his intrigues against
Theodosius, 444
Valerianus, Marius, 137
Vanduara [Paisley), 123, 156
Varse [Bodfari), 163
Vectis [Wight), 44, 167
Vecturiones [Scottish tribe), 441
Velibori [Irish tribe), 60
Vellocatus, 57
Veniconii [Irish tribe), 64
Venonae, 151
Venricones [Scottish tribe), 63
Venta Belgarum ( Winchester), 121,
167
Venta Tcenorum [Caistor), 122,
160
Venta Silurum [Caerwent), 169
Venusius, chief of the Biigantes,
48, 57
Veranius, 49
Verbeia, a goddess worshipped in
Roman Britain, 352
Veredarii, 223
Verio, a British prince, 40, 42
Verlucio [Highfield), 1 69
Verometuin [near Willoughby),
152
Verterse [Brough), 155
Verulamium [near St. Alhan' s), 36,
41, 53, 122, 148, 212
Vespasian, the emperor, 42
Veteres, Vetires, or Vetiris, a god
worshipped, in Roman Britain,
349
Vettiiis Bolanus, 57
Vice vicinalcs, privxtce, agrarice,
device, 22
Vicarii of Britain, see Governors.
Victoria [Dealgin Ross), 123,
155
Victorinus, Aufidius, 127
Victorinus, Maurusius, 138
Victory, Avorship of, 336
Villa,' dlQ
Villa Faustini, 160
Villas, Roman, 227 — 255 ; occu-
pied by the Anglo- Saxons, 508
Villages, JSritish and Roman, 113
—115, 255
2M
562
INDEX.
Vinclol;ala {Eutchester), 157
Vindogladia {Gussages), 1G7
Viiidoluna (Chester/ioitii), 158
Vindomis [Whitechiirch), 167
Vindomora [Ehchester), 154
Vinovium or Vinnovium {Binclies-
ter), 122, 154
Viradesthi, a g-oddess worshipped
in Roman Britain, 353
Viroconium, see Uriconiuni.
Virosidum {Maryport and Ellen-
horoiigli)^ 159
Yodioe [Irish tribe), 64
Voliba {o)i the Foivey), 121
Volsellw, 399
Voluha [the Fowcij), 168
Voluntii [Lancashire), 62
Voluntii [Irish tribe), 64
Vortigern, king of the Britons,
455, 456
Walls, Roman, character of, 172 —
177 ; Hadrian's, see Hadrian.
Water-cock, Roman, 404
Watling- Street, 523
Weapons, Roman, 414
Week, gods of the days of the,
322, 323
Welsh, origin and meaning of the
word, 457 ; the Welsli settle-
ment in England, 525 — 527 ;
Christianity introduced among
them, 527
Wessex, kingdom of, founded, 459
West-Saxons, kingdom of the,
founded, 458 ; converted to
Christianity, 463
Wintan-ceaster [Jfl'nchester), 459
Woodchester, Roman villa there
described, 229—240
THE END.
f'KlNTED BY BALLANTVNE, HANSOX AND CO.
EUINBUKGH AND LONUO.N'.
Wright, Ti
Saxon»
- The Celt, the Roman, and the
PONTIFICAL- '^S^'^^7,^^
OF M£QiA::VAL STUDIES
59 QUEEN'S PARK
TORONTO 5. CANADA
2 5824'