(logo)
(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Open Source Books | Project Gutenberg | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Children's Library | Additional Collections

Search: Advanced Search

UploadAnonymous User (login or join us) 
See other formats

Full text of "A CHURCHILL READER THE WIT AND WISDOM OF SIR WINSTON CHURCHILL"

A 

Churchill 
Reader 




(Photograph "I he Times) 

SIR WINSTON CHURCHILL IN THE CABINET ROOM 
ON HIS SEVENTY -NINTH BIRTHDAY 



A 

Churchill 
Reader 



The Wit and Wisdom 
of Sir Winston Churchill 

Constructed from his own sayings and writings 

and framed with an introduction by 

COLIN R. GOOTE 

with the collaboration of 

P. D. BUNYAN 



HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY BOSTON 

S&toettfoe $te*g Cambridge 

1 954 



Copyright, 1954, by Colin K. Coote 
All riglits reserved including the right to ie produce this 

book or parts thereof in any foim 
Library of Congress catalogue card number: 54-10086 

The selections from Great Contemporaries; copyright, 1937, by 
Winston Churchill; are used by permission of the publishers, 
G. P. Putnam s Sons. 

The selections from Amid These Storms by Winston Churchill; 
copyright, 1932, by Charles Scribner s Sons; are used by permis 
sion of the publishers. 

The selections from The World Crisis by Winston Churchill; 
copyright, 1923, 1927, 1929, 1931, by Charles Scnbner s Sons; 
are used by pet mission of the publishers. 



CAMBRIDGE! MASSACHUSETTS 
PRINTED IN THE U.S.A. 



Preface 



OEVEN YEARS AGO, when Sir Winston Churchill was a mere 
lad of seventy-three, I compiled a short anthology of his max 
ims and reflections. Since then many more such sayings have 
come from his pen and his tongue; he has many more achieve 
ments to his credit, including that of becoming Prime Minis 
ter for the third time; and he has entered on his eightieth 
year. These circumstances combined to suggest that an ex 
pansion of the original quotations and a revision of the in 
troductory disquisition on Sir Winston s personality might 
not be untimely. It is true that he is not the sort of man 
who excites differences of appraisal from year to year; and 
I do not feel any urge to vary the essence of what I wrote in 
1947. 

The classification of quotations is no easier now than it 
was then. A person s life may be divided into stages less con 
troversially than his sayings into subjects. I have, however, 
thought it fair to diminish the quotations relevant to dead 
issues, such as Indian constitutional reform, and to increase 
those which have a bearing on problems still alive today. 



VI PREFACE 

I am indebted to G. P. Putnam s Sons, Charles Scribner s 
Sons, and Houghton Mifflin Company for permission to 
quote from various works of Sir Winston Churchill, pub 
lished by them. 

To Sir Winston himself, I am most grateful for approving 
and endorsing this revision of my earlier work, 

COLIN COOTE 
January 1, 1954 



Contents 



Preface v 
Introduction by Colin R. Coote 1 

1 On Himself 30 

2 On His Dislikes 68 

3 On Russia 84 

4 On His Likes 101 

5 On Parliament and Parties 120 

6 On Policies and Politics 142 

7 A Political Miscellany 167 

8 On the English Language 183 

9 On War 194 



Viii CONTENTS 

10 On Men in War 220 

11 On Battles and Weapons 234 

12 On Socialism and Socialists 260 

13 On Britain and the Empire 282 

14 On the Monarchy 316 

15 On India 321 

16 On Foreigners 332 

17 On America 360 

18 On Human Conduct 376 
Index 407 



A 

Churchill 
Reader 



Introduction 



HEN by sheer luck I was pitchforked from the trenches 
into Parliament thirty-six years ago, the first statesman whom 
I met personally was Sir Winston Churchill. It was a gather 
ing of prospective Coalition Liberal candidates before the 
election of 1918. A slightly bent figure, with a slightly echo 
ing articulation, gave us a few words of greeting and of 
exhortation. 

This young man of forty-five had already been a highly 
controversial figure for twenty years. My sympathies even 
then were all with him. Before the war only Lloyd George 
had outshone him in Liberal eyes. During the war, whatever 
the high-ups may have thought, the soldiery and the subal 
terns felt in their bones that the Gallipoli venture was right. 
Yet he had already passed through some of those strange 
variations in popular affection which it was his fate to en 
counter throughout life. It is curious to reflect, for example, 
that when he was appointed First Lord of the Admiralty in 
1911, nervousness was prevalent in the "blue-water school." 
The reason was that he was his father s son; and it was 



2 A CHURCHILL READER 

remembered, when much else was forgotten, that Lord 
Randolph had resigned office on the issue of economy in the 
fighting services. That was the "tattered flag* which, in his 
first speech in Parliament, young Winston had spoken of 
raising again. Oblivious therefore of the intermediate evolu 
tion of the German menace, men rather expected that the 
new First Lord would skin the Navy. 

The songs of the people often reflect a popular mood better 
than the most erudite histories; and one song, dating from 
1911, ran somewhat as follows: 

Don t let us scrap the British Navy! 

Don t let us scrap our men of war! 

What do we care if the income-tax is five bob in the pound, 

We can owe it as we ve always done before. 

Let Winston say ta-ta to the totems he adores, 

But never to the gallant tars what guard our native shores. 

He can scrap his bowlers, boaters, toppers, Homburgs and 

velours 
But he mustn t never scrap the British Navy. 

The mention of "five bob" as an incredibly astronomical 
rate of income tax is not the only feature which will excite 
a wry grin. The song s Aunt Sally was the very man to whom 
Kitchener could say five years later: "One thing they cannot 
take from you the Fleet was ready/ 

These early stages on the long journey from enfant terrible 
to elder statesman are not the least fascinating. They gave 
him the label "impulsive" which he has always found it im 
possible to unstick. He has not tried very hard to unstick it, 
and with reason, for what was intended as a slur has proved, 
by and large, to be a compliment. There can be no strong 
pulse in a man without that very characteristic of impulsive 
ness, which is not synonymous with unbalance. 



INTRODUCTION 3 

To admire trimmers is like admiring a motorcar without 
an engine. The tires look lovely, but they don t turn. "Tran 
quillity " is a slogan on which at least one Government in our 
time has been returned to power. "Tranquillity" indeed! 
There is nothing more tranquil than the grave. "I will never 
stifle myself in such a moral and intellectual sepulchre/ 
exclaimed Sir Winston anent the " tranquillity" Government 
of 1922. He certainly never has; and if some drops from his 
cataract of impulses have been unproductive, the main body 
of it has been like the Niagara and the Victoria Falls com 
bined, generating a fertilising electricity in men s minds and 
actions. 

The purpose of this book is to show in and from his own 
words what he is, as a man, as a statesman, as an orator, and 
as a writer. It may therefore seem superfluous that I should 
try in this introduction to add one more to the many assess 
ments made of him by others. But it has been my duty, as a 
professional journalist for thirty years, to do so continuously, 
refreshed by an acquaintance extending over that period 
and to me from the very first moment stimulating and 
fascinating. It was never possible to approach him, as jour 
nalists so often approach politicians, with some degree of 
scepticism! Even when you thought him mistaken, his 
sincerity and capacity blazed out at you like a lighthouse. 
His light to his friends has indeed almost invariably been a 
guiding beam and not a will-o -the-wisp. 

It is one, and one only, of the characteristics of great men 
that they arouse extremes of affection and of hostility. 
Charles James Fox ploughed a lonely oflficeless furrow for 
twelve years, subject to the unrivalled rancour of the majority 
but sustained by the devoted affection of a few friends. No 
statesman in our history seems to me to bear a closer analogy 
to Sir Winston, and had he lived to Sir Winston s age, the 



4 A CHURCHILL READER 

analogy might have been closer still. But of course the 
capacity to evoke such extremes of hostility and of adulation 
is no complete criterion of true greatness. Quite inferior 
types have clawed their way to eminence and had their season 
of splendour, only to reveal shoddiness and squalor in defeat. 
It is, perhaps, a peculiarity of the British race that it has 
often indulged in affection for nonentities, but never sur 
rendered its soul to third-class tyrants. Others, of course, 
have. The most extraordinary case is not that of Hitler or 
of Mussolini. There was a certain Francesco Lopez, Dictator of 
Paraguay, who fought all his neighbours for twenty years 
until the proportion of men to women among his people 
was one to twenty. The story of so many "great" careers 
illustrates the gullibility of followers rather than the genius 
of leaders. For my part, I think the calibre of a statesman is 
shown less by how he behaves in triumph than by how he 
behaves in adversity. 

Sir Winston s claim to greatness is that he has achieved a 
towering eminence in spite of a usually preponderating and 
always latent unpopularity. This hostility has always puzzled 
and pained him, though he has borne its manifestations with 
resilient composure. Only twice, I think, in his career has 
any cry of despair escaped from him. The first was when 
he was hounded from office after the Gallipoli failure; the 
second was when he heard of Mr. Eden s resignation in 1937. 
The first was wrung from him by blatant injustice, not so 
much towards himself as towards the one fertile strategic idea 
which emerged during the First World War. The second 
was prompted by the knowledge that Mr. Eden was the only 
prominent member of the Chamberlain Government who 
shared and strove for his conception of the German danger, 
His resignation meant a Second World War, which we were 
more than likely to lose. 



INTRODUCTION 5 

Sir Winston has never thought or said that the British 
people were not good enough to appreciate him when they 
have turned against him. That sort of reaction belongs to 
the Hitlers and Mussolinis of this world. He has, I think, 
in spite of an astonishing versatility, a stark simplicity of 
mind. Until the age of twenty, when he began to educate 
himself, he had repulsed every attempt to give him academic 
instruction. But he had learned a code of conduct, which it 
is, perhaps, the main purpose of education to provide. Never 
whine in defeat. Never gloat in victory. As he has put it him 
self, "In war, Resolution. In defeat, Defiance. In victory, 
Magnanimity. In Peace, Goodwill." 

Let us take him first as a writer. The being who, in his first 
written examination, could find nothing to fill the page 
except his name, has just completed a book of about a million 
words in eight years, in spite of the distractions of being 
Leader of the Opposition, Prime Minister, and a world 
figure. He has also found time during the same period for 
some farming, painting, and horse-racing. Neither his work 
nor his pastimes have been unsuccessful. 

They have given him the one thing essential to a writer, 
namely, background. You may write with the vocabulary 
of men and of angels, but if you have not background, it 
profits you nothing. I suppose the fictional character of the 
"strong silent man" does exist in fact; but in my experience 
strong men are not silent. If they are strong it is because, 
like Odysseus, they have seen many cities of men and known 
their minds. Faced with any given situation, they know 
what to do, and the expression of it wells out of them in 
words; and the best way to get ideas in order is to put them 
down on paper. 

Sir Winston was not born with the capacity to do so. He 
could always talk, but he could not write. I have often 



6 A CHURCHILL READER 

noticed that the two capacities seldom go together. The 
rousing orator is liable to be a flat writer. The reason may 
well be that you cannot transpose into writing variations of 
tone, of expression, of gesture. The orator is essentially an 
actor, the writer is a playwright. It is one of Sir Winston s 
titles to fame that he has succeeded in combining the two 
capacities. 

One misfortune of his success is that whenever a schoolboy 
is caught out in a piece of peculiarly crass ignorance, he can 
round on his indignant parents by quoting Sir Winston s 
example. The parent can only hope that the example will 
be followed beyond adolescence; but that is not very likely. 
For Sir Winston had several spurs, peculiar to himself, 
towards producing the change of interests which took place 
when he was a cavalry subaltern at Bangalore. First and 
foremost, of course, was admiration for a father, remote, 
talented, unfortunate, and wronged. It is quite certain that, 
viewing the golden happiness of Lord Randolph s beginnings 
and the leaden misery of his end, the son formed the ambition 
to vindicate and even to avenge. 

In the second place, his mind had never been unfertile. It 
was restless; not lazy. The catchcrops of soldiering and of 
polo could not for ever be the only growths from so rich a 
soil. He must be a dull dog indeed who has not tried his 
youthful hand at writing and shuddered in after years at 
the doggerel and cliches which such attempts produced. 
Writing is, after all, one of the few methods by which man 
can respond to his innate hope of being remembered. "When 
I am dead, I hope it may be said: His sins were scarlet, but 
his books were read/ " Belloc s epigram succinctly states 
our aspirations after immortality. But writing is something 
which has to be learned. It simply is not true, as many of 
my correspondents seem to think, that a capacity to write 
is innate and exists in those who have manifested no other 



INTRODUCTI ON 7 

sign of capacity. It requires a frustrating and lengthy ap 
prenticeship. It requires a great sensibility to the sound and 
music of words. For words even if only written can and 
should ring in the auditorium of the mind, and prose has a 
cadence as well as verse. Every competent journalist knows 
that though a sentence may be grammatically correct, it can 
sound clumsy and ugly. It can look as wrong as a misspelt 
word. You have to learn to write tunefully just as you have 
to learn to spell correctly. 

At this point, I ask pardon for interpolating a prejudice. 
I consider that to compose on a typewriter greatly increases 
the difficulty of good writing. In the first place, a typewriter 
is the refuge of those too slovenly to write in a legible hand 
and good handwriting is a lovely thing. In the second place 
(unless, of course, you copy on a typewriter what you have 
written out first), the use of a machine seems to me to militate 
against finding the right word, against good phrasing, and 
even against grammar. "The structure of the English sen 
tence is a noble thing," Sir Winston once wrote. So is the 
structure of an arterial road; and both are spoiled by ribbon 
development. Writers in English are lucky. They possess 
an instrument in the English tongue which, though terse and 
strong, is also flexible and variegated. For example, English 
lyric poetry, though it borrows its forms, is supreme in its 
music. There are many English lyrics, and many pieces of 
English prose, which arouse in the reader the emotions felt 
by Keats on dipping into Chapman s translation of Homer 
a sort of ecstatic thrill compounded of awe and a desire for 
emulation. 

Sir Winston possessed this sensibility at an early age. The 
sonorous tones of Gibbon and Macaulay found an echo in his 
mind. Having begun reading, largely out of self-reproach 
for the academic years which the locust had eaten, he became 
fascinated and enthralled by what he read. Gibbon, as Sir 



8 A CHURCHILL READER 

Arthur Conan Doyle in one of his less-known books once said, 
gives the impression of serenely floating upon a cloud and 
watching pygmies hurrying and scurrying about below. That 
alone tickles the fancy of self-confident young people. Speak 
ing again from personal experience, I find that most of the 
writing submitted by youthful contributors is an unconscious 
parody of Gibbon, with robustness deteriorated into ro 
tundity. Only occasionally does the exhilaration produced 
by a great writer produce the retention of his qualities 
coupled with something new and individual. That happened 
in the case of Sir Winston. Whatever traces of other men s 
styles appear in his writings, they have a style of their own. 
Let me give one example his verdict on the Margrave of 
Baden. 

"His military epitaph for all time must be that the two 
greatest captains of the age . . . rated, by actions more ex 
pressive than words, his absence from a decisive battlefield 
well worth 15,000 men/ 

The roll of the sentence is Gibbonian, but the humour is 
infinitely more subtle and cleaner. 

That does not mean that Sir Winston Churchill is in 
variably original. Nobody soaked in history ever is; and since 
history repeats itself, historians are liable to repeat each 
other. Thus when, in the dark hours of May 1940, he was 
called upon to champion an apparently collapsing cause, his 
mind went back to Garibaldi, similarly about to set out on 
a fearful and desperate journey. So he echoed Garibaldi s 
words to his followers and offered us nothing but "blood, 
toil, tears, and sweat." Or again, when he first became Prime 
Minister in an hour of impending doom, he thought of old 
Clemenceau, as he was being asked, "What is your 
policy?"; and of Clemenceau s reply, "Je fais la guerre." And 
there was a famous passage in a later speech about "fighting 
on the beaches, in the hills, in the streets," which echoed 



INTRODUCTION V 

Clemenceau s defiance in 1918, "I shall fight in front of Paris, 
within Paris, behind Paris." 

I have spoken of the music of words, and of how that music 
can be transmuted from the spoken to the written word. 
Let me give one more example from Sir Winston s great war 
speeches. They have the quite unusual quality of reading 
as well as they sounded. Indeed, as Sir Norman Angell has 
pointed out, they fall naturally into the vers libre of the 
Psalms. Similarly his writings, if you speak them aloud, 
sound as well as they read. That is as it should be, though it 
rarely is. For writing was originally a transcript of sound. 
The "thunder of the Odyssey" is a true description, though 
I do not suppose anybody has recited Homer for centuries. 
You can hear the horn of Roland sounding in the dolorous 
pass when you read his Song. 

In Sir Winston s case the relationship between the written 
and the spoken word is easily explained. His method of pre 
paring a speech is or, for a long time, was to write it 
out and learn it by heart. His method of writing is to dictate, 
and revise the result, not merely once but as many times as 
are necessary for the writing to satisfy him. It might be 
thought that this would involve late delivery of copy, which, 
in a writer, is the unforgivable sin. But in my experience 
he has never committed it. After delivery of the first proofs, 
there is generally a massive sequence o overtakes and quite 
often a substantial piece of rewriting. But all arrive in time. 
He has himself castigated unpunctuality as intolerable rude 
ness, and he satisfies the definition of a gentleman as one 
who is never unintentionally rude. There is very great 
versatility in his writing. He is not, of course, a journalist 
in the day-to-day professional sense, but he started his literary 
career as a war correspondent in the spacious days when sub 
editors were grammarians rather than executioners, and he 
regularly wrote feature articles for years. To write such 



10 A CHURCHILL READER 

articles requires a technique wholly different from that of a 
writer of books; though they can be, and Sir Winston was one 
of the first to do so, tailored into a book. To both the lesser 
and the greater tasks he devotes equal care, and in both he 
has achieved success. Those who work for him on the prep 
aration either of articles or of books must not expect that 
they will be allowed to be "ghost writers" people who 
write something that somebody else signs. I still remember 
rather ruefully an occasion, years and years ago, when I was 
asked to help in the preparation of a certain article. Im 
mensely flattered, I produced not information but an article 
itself, written in a combination of the styles of Carlyle, 
Chesterfield, and (as I thought) Churchill. The article ap 
peared; but not a comma of it was mine. That was editorship 
indeedl 

There is, however, one form of writing in which he has 
never indulged. Not a single poem has ever been attributed 
to him; and that is strange in one with so deep a sense of 
rhythm. He has, moreover, a most capacious memory for 
poetry, and I have heard him repeat on the spur of the 
moment verses as appropriate to the occasion as his quotations 
from Clough ("Westward, look, the land is bright") in a 
famous wartime speech. (Sir Winston was referring in a dark 
hour to the hope and help to be expected from America.) It 
is queer that one with such a fine taste in words should not 
have tried his hand at serious verse. His only indulgence in 
verse of any kind which I can recall is a neat little couplet, 
urging that the Big Three should get down to business. 

No more let us alter or falter or palter. 
From Malta to Yalta, and Yalta to Malta. 

He has tried it at every form of prose writing the full- 
length history; the biography (at which, as he has shown 



INTROD UCTION 11 

both in Lord Randolph Churchill and Marlborough, he is 
outstanding); the autobiography; the feature article; the 
character sketch; and, last but not least, that more airy form 
of writing, sometimes called a vignette, in which a picture is 
drawn of a hobby or an incident outside the ordinary run of 
a man s life. Such a work, for example, is Painting as a 
Pastime. 

There is one other lacuna in his activities which will 
strike the English, at least, as curious. So far as I know, he 
has never struck a golf ball, kicked a football, or bowled a 
cricket ball. This may be, to some extent, due to an early 
accident at polo; but no game except polo has ever greatly 
appealed to him. Fencing (which hardly ranks as a game) 
was an accomplishment at which, as a boy at Harrow, he 
was an expert enough to carry off the foils championship. 
But he did not pursue this sport into adult life. For the rest, 
he has deliberately preferred such recreations as building, 
riding, and in later life painting; and even in the 
matter of riding, there is no trace of him in the hunting field. 

Much of what has been said about him as a writer applies to 
him as an orator. That must, of course, follow from a habit 
of writing speeches and of speaking writings. The technique 
which he employs is very much the same. There is first of all 
the careful build-up of relevant information, presented with 
enough embellishment of phrase to attract and to hold the 
interest of the uninstructed, and enough profundity of 
knowledge to impress the expert. Then there is a pause, 
more evident in speech than in writing, though a reader can 
sense the pen quivering just as the audience can see the eye 
twinkling. Finally, out it comes a phrase or a word sum 
marising what he has had in mind all through the prepara 
tory period. I give one example not for the argument, 
which is hotly disputed by naval opinion, but for the style. 
His account of the Battle of Jutland begins with a wealth of 



12 A CHURCHILL READER 

soberly marshalled technical detail. The frightful clash of 
the steel monsters, with their armaments so powerful as to 
make the impact of their shells even on steel casing like "hit 
ting an eggshell with a hammer/ is dramatically described. 
He lists, at each of the three climacterics of the engagement, 
the courses open to the British Commander-in-Chief. He 
tells how, by some fatality, not the most fruitful course was 
followed upon any of the three occasions; and sums it all up 
by saying simply, "Three times are a lot/ 7 As good an 
example from a speech as any other is the sentence which still 
surrounds like an aureole the Battle of Britain pilots: "Never 
in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many 
to so few." These two examples, by the way, support Mr, 
Charles Morgan s contention that he produces his effects by 
the hammer strokes of short words and not by the caresses of 
polysyllables. 

As a speaker, Sir Winston confesses that at the beginning 
of his career he could not string two sentences together with 
out preparation. His maiden speech in Parliament had to 
be launched by a kindly piece of prompting from a fellow 
member. (Who does not know only too well that dark blank, 
black as the pit from ear to ear, so to say, which descends 
upon one as the Speaker utters one s name!) But practice 
made perfect. For many years now there has been no greater 
master of the impromptu. I recall an occasion when that 
nine stone of quicksilver, Wedgwood Benn (now Lord Stans- 
gate), worked himself up into a frenzy and was told, "The 
honourable gentleman should not generate more indigna 
tion than he can conveniently contain"; or his comment to 
another short-legged member in a similarly frequent state 
of ebullition, "The honourable member should not be so 
ready to hop down off his perch "; or his retort to charges of 
partisanship during the General Strike, "I cannot undertake 



INTRODUCTION 13 

to be impartial as between the Fire Brigade and the fire." 

There is, moreover, one form of speaking in which Sir 
Winston excels, though it is impossible to illustrate his elo 
quence by citation. This is conversation talk on those 
private occasions when language is given to us to reveal and 
not to conceal our thoughts. The conditions requisite for 
conversation are that bodies should be relaxed but minds 
active; that the company should be congenial though of varied 
opinions; that nobody should be in a hurry; and that there 
should be a certain moderate lubrication of the inner man. 
It is easy to see how the complexity of modern existence and, 
more recently, the impact of rationing have destroyed the 
opportunities for this fertile and fruitful form of human 
intercourse. But it survives in odd corners, and those fortu 
nate enough to find Sir Winston in one of them will have a 
pleasant evening. "Churchill," the late President Roosevelt 
is reported to have said, "has a hundred ideas a day, of 
which at least four are good ideas." Well, four are a lot. 

It is therefore quite untrue that the figure which he cuts 
as a master of language owes everything to the corsets of 
preparation. He has a natural taste for the delicacies of the 
English tongue, which is, indeed, the supreme instrument 
for both delicacy and indelicacy. (A case can be made out 
that it is the best language in which to write lyric poetry and 
the best language in which to swear.) For myself, I think that 
however good the instrument and the technical use of it, the 
effect of oratory depends very largely on the orator s voice. 
Not only what the orator says, but how he says it is important. 
It is even true today that the most effective speaker over the 
radio is not the most effective to an audience. Lord Baldwin 
was much better over the air than on the ground, so to say; 
and if we were to revive the classical schools of rhetoric, they 
might do worse than study why some disembodied voices are 



14 A CHURCHILL READER 

so much better than others. It is so. As for Sir Winston, he 
is pretty good at both, but, in my opinion, not quite so good 
over the radio. It is not the gestures that one misses, for he 
uses few gestures. I think the inability to see the facial ex 
pressions as he works through and up to his points is one 
reason. Another may be that an audience is necessary for 
some speakers to give of their best the corporative mind 
reacts on the individual mind, and vice versa. Soliloquy does 
not suit Sir Winston. He is, first and foremost, a House of 
Commons man. Parliament is his natural platform, or grind 
stone, or touchstone. Incidentally, there is no audience 
which can better silence the bore or spur the brilliant. 
The calibre of an orator must be assessed relatively as well 
as absolutely. It has been my fate to hear (and to understand) 
orators of many nations; and I have an admiration for any 
body who can make a speech, because I am wholly incapable 
of making one myself. I can say, therefore, with complete 
objectivity that Mussolini could be a finer actor, Briand 
more persuasive, Viviani more polished, Lloyd George more 
witty, Lord Birkenhead more trenchant. But none of these 
gave the same impression of power and sincerity as Sir 
Winston. (Incidentally, I could never understand Hitler s 
undoubted successes with his audiences. Goebbels was far 
better.) On great occasions he does not seem to have to find 
the mot juste it seems to be given to him. The quality 
of oratory consists not merely in arousing emotions, but also, 
if need be, in calming them. Personally, therefore, I am not 
inclined to rank even his finest war speeches as necessarily 
his best. Any man with any gift of speech at all would have 
caught inspiration from the grimly ecstatic courage of those 
times. The best speech, qua speech, is surely that which 
makes head against a current. On this view the two speeches 
which I would select as Sir Winston s best are that which he 



INTRODUCTION 15 

made in the debate on the Amritsar shooting and that which 
he made on the Munich Agreement. In the first he faced a 
House vehemently hostile, bored it into calmness with a dis 
quisition on military law, and then caught its interest with 
exactly the same arguments as those which, in another s 
mouth, had roused it to fury. In the second, he had to make 
head against the almost hysterical relief that war had been 
averted. He gained no new converts, but he made the hysteri 
cal "think it possible that they were mistaken." 

There is another speech of Sir Winston s which, in racing 
parlance, is worthy of a place. It was made in the debate 
on the murder of Sir Henry Wilson by an Irish gunman 
a debate which found the Home Secretary of the day unable 
to make head against charges of inadequate security precau 
tions. The Colonial Secretary, as Sir Winston then was, came 
to the rescue and saved the Parliamentary day. 

My last example is taken to show that at the age of seventy- 
nine this capacity to disarm opponents was undiminished. 
Sir Winston spoke in the foreign affairs debate on May 11, 
1953. It must be remembered that one of the few jobs he has 
never held is that of Foreign Secretary; that eighteen months 
earlier he had been vociferously accused of being a war 
monger; and that his remarks upon Communism all his life 
had been as blunt as a bludgeon. The House was therefore 
expecting fireworks. Instead, they got a piece of sober and 
constructive reasoning, a piercing analysis of the chances of 
an accommodation with the Communist world the dia 
metric opposite of sabre-rattling. The astonishment evinced 
by his audience only shows how profoundly his career and 
his character have been misunderstood. "Peace," he said 
during the election of 1951, "is the last prize I have left to 
win." It is the prize which he has sought all his life; and 
would often have won, had he been heeded. How it can be 



16 A CHURCHILL READER 

supposed that war could appeal to one with so broad a streak 
of emotion and of tenderness in his character passes my com 
prehension. But I suppose that it is a principle of party 
politics that one s opponents should be considered not only 
wrong but damned. 

It is to be observed that two out of the four speeches 
selected changed, the third shook, and the fourth surprised 
the prevalent opinion of the House of Commons. To have 
done any of these things is an achievement of which any 
statesman can be proud. In an experience of Parliament 
extending over nearly thirty years I can count the occasions 
on which it has been done on the fingers of two hands. So 
rare it is for an orator to "get beyond the guard o the English 
heart." Where Sir Winston is exceptional is that there is 
always a chance of his doing it. To those who may think that 
the terrible difficulty of the task is a reflection on the capacity 
of M.P.s, I must point out that, if it were easy, stability of 
Government would become impossible; and it is precisely 
in its quality of stability that the British Parliamentary 
system is superior to others of the same stamp. 

The last comment to be made upon Sir Winston s speeches 
and writings is that though they are both mouth and brain 
filling, they are immune from the jargon in which so many 
State papers and statutes are couched. Nor, happily, are they 
tinted with the new horror of "basic English/ though it must 
be admitted that, in an odd moment, he himself toyed with 
the idea of some simplification which would help English to 
become an even more widespread lingua franca. Sir Win 
ston s tilt against linguistic monstrosities during the war was 
certainly one of the four bright ideas which he had on that 
particular day. Unfortunately, the wound inflicted by his 
lance was not mortal, but the recovery of the Goliath of de- 
partmentalese does not detract from the merit of Sir Win- 



INTRODUCTION 17 

ston s attempt to save both England and English. 

How does he rank as a statesman? Well, what is a states 
man? It is, as usual, much easier to define what he is not than 
what he is. Aristotle defined him as a man of a great soul; but 
that is an uninformative generality. He must indeed have 
principles, but not necessarily fixed principles. They must, 
as Sir Winston has said, be subject "to a harmonious process 
which keeps them in tune with the course of events." Perhaps 
he can best be defined as a man of character, with a frame of 
knowledge and experience, not so clever as to be unstable, 
not so dense as to be invariably stubborn. He must, as the late 
Lord Morley wrote, possess "fibre." Many years ago I will 
not say in whose Premiership a Frenchman remarked to 
me, "How unfortunate you English are! Formerly you were 
ruled by men of character. Now you are ruled by men of 
brains." It is not always clever to be always clever. 

To all these qualities of a statesman, Sir Winston has a 
strong claim. He did what he thought right for many years, 
though the consequence was living in the political wilderness. 
His experience of office is quite unique and his experience 
of the world hardly less. In his veins runs the civilisation of 
the Old World and the colour of the New. He has "warmed 
both hands before the fire of life." He has belonged to all 
parties, except the extremes; and to no party. And as for 
character, there is no assembly in which he would be a nonen 
tity and few in which he would not be outstanding. 

Are these claims to statesmanship at all impaired by foibles? 
Let us see. One of these foibles is the wearing of queer-shaped 
hats. As the doggerel quoted earlier shows, it was this pecu 
liarity which once struck most forcibly the popular conscious 
ness. But hats do not matter nearly so much as what is under 
neath them. Again, he smokes cigars incessantly; but since 
the time of James I that has not been considered a degrading 



18 A CHURCHILL READER 

habit. He likes the good things of the table and of the cellar 
who, except the dyspeptics and the cranks, does not? One 
of the few survivals from the age of rotten boroughs is the 
rotten insinuation that men in the public eye are alcoholics 
unless they are teetotallers. No time need be wasted, in this 
case, upon denying such a charge. Sir Winston s own words 
are enough: "I have been brought up and trained to have the 
utmost contempt for people who get drunk. 11 

Another foible is his partiality for military history, of which 
he has read, written, and made a good deal. People have de 
duced therefrom that he enjoys war. On the contrary, the 
true soldier has an even greater horror of war than the civil 
ian, and though interested in the technical conduct of opera 
tions is no less interested in the problem of how to avoid 
them. There comes a point when life must be risked to save 
all that makes life worth living; and then indeed battle must 
be sustained up to and beyond the edge of endurance. But 
until then, the soldier is no Jingo; nor is Sir Winston. Indeed, 
it is his custom, when called upon to drink the loyal toast, to 
add to The Queen I" the sot to voce prayer "And no war. 

It has often been said that his changes of party are in them 
selves a proof of volatility. His own pronouncement on the 
point begs some questions, such as how far personal ideas 
should be subordinated to party policy; but it makes a strong 
case in a world where parties change their views more fre 
quently than politicians change their party "The only way 
a man can remain constant amid changing circumstances is 
to change with them, while preserving the same dominating 
purpose. 1 He started as a Tory; became a Liberal; then a 
Coalition Liberal; then a Constitutionalist; and finally a 
Tory again. But not one of these changes was due to "gen 
uinely seeking work," as was so cruelly said of another states 
man who changed his party. The kind of Toryism with 
which *Jbe bfflan was the Torv Democracv of hw father 



INTROBU CTI ON 19 

gifted and tragic figure, who captured the fervent and endur 
ing admiration of his son by such slender and casual contacts. 
As his father s experience showed, the Tory Party at the turn 
of the century was very different from the party as it is today. 
Sir Winston broke with it largely upon the khaki view of the 
Boer War, which was the view responsible for winning the 
election of 1902. When he changed over, it was not generally 
anticipated that the Liberals would prevail at the next elec 
tion. He was transferring to what many thought would be the 
losing side. What he did was to move to his then spiritual 
home among that section of the Liberal Party known as 
"Liberal Imperialists." 

The fiscal controversy which developed in 1904 was not cal 
culated to make him regret the change. To one who "believed 
in Free Trade as in the laws of mathematics," Mr. Joseph 
Chamberlain s new tariff policy was the reverse of a lodestar. 
Moreover, there was, and always has been, a streak of the 
social reformer in Sir Winston. He believed in bringing "the 
magic of averages to the rescue of millions" and was in good 
company in scorning the Tory Party s campaign against 
"stamp licking." His adherence to the Lloyd Georgian rather 
than to the Asquithian wing of the Liberals at the close of 
the First World War was also natural. Apart from L. G. 
having been the Prime Minister who won the war, they had 
been close friends long before it. What is, at first sight, aston 
ishing is that the Conservative leaders who had refused only 
two years earlier to enter any Government of which he was a 
member should have accepted him in the postwar Coalition 
as a valued colleague. The reason was, of course, that a new 
political alignment had emerged. The old Radical tail of the 
Liberal dog, under the new and masterly name of the Labour 
Party, wagged most of the animal. This party crossed the line 
dividing Reform from Revolution. There could be no ques 
tion upon which side of the line Sir Winston would be found. 



20 A CHURCHILL READER 

He is a reformist, through and through. He has even favoured 
measures with a Socialistic flavour, such as the nationalisation 
of the railways, seeing or foreseeing that such a service was at 
once indispensable and unremunerative. But the idea of a 
Socialist State was repugnant to him. 

When Socialism uprooted the undergrowth in the old 
Liberal forest, a number of trees were left in an isolation far 
from splendid. Sir Winston was one such. He was in quite a 
different position from Conservative Ministers, such as Sir 
Austen Chamberlain, who stood aloof from their party when 
the Coalition broke up in 1922. He was politically derailed; 
they had just shunted themselves into a siding. It was his 
good fortune that Mr. Baldwin, who was the supreme po 
litical manager of our time, whatever else he was not, was 
quite determined, after his defeat on the tariff issue in 1924, 
to give the Tory Party a wider umbrella. The spread covered 
Sir Winston, who has always been essentially a Coalitionist. 
He has never been at his happiest as a party man; for he is a 
Parliament man a "child of the House of Commons * 
and Parliament cannot thrive without both cut and thrust, 
and give and take. In his very first by-election he made an 
error of tactics, which caused the late Lord Balfour to ex 
claim, "I thought he was a young man of promise* It appears 
he is only a young man of promises/* He has often been so 
far in advance of the electorate that the attempt to keep up 
has led them to look back to someone else. Thus Dundee, 
after serenely voting him in from 1908 to 1918, savagely voted 
him out in 1922. Or again the vision of a Socialist Gestapo, 
imparted in a broadcast in 1945, was viewed by the electors 
as a hallucination, and an unknown incoherent polled 10,000 
votes against the Prime Minister who had won the war. He 
has never had a territorial base like David Lloyd George in 
Wales or the Chamberlains in Birmingham. Britain is his 
constituency, and not any particular part of it, nor any par- 



INTRODUCTION 21 

ticular party in it. At any crisis in our national affairs, his 
instinct has been to search for a national Government, 
broadly based upon all classes. 

That was also Mr. Baldwin s instinct. That was why Sir 
Winston, to his own surprise, was given the Chancellorship of 
the Exchequer from 1925 to 1929. I must devote a few words 
to this period, because it is sometimes considered to mark a 
lapse in his standards of achievement. 

This view is based upon a highly selective memory. It is 
recalled that he returned to the gold standard, and thus 
opened the door to the spectre of unemployment. The error 
was, however, committed because for once he listened too 
much to some of his advisers. The real "bankers ramp" was 
then, not in 1931. Nobody could be dogmatic about the 
question in advance. Thus the late Lord Keynes was origi 
nally against the step, and, some time after it had been taken, 
persuaded Sir Winston that it had been a mistake. Sir Win 
ston made all arrangements to say so in a public speech, but 
to his dismay heard Lord Keynes, who spoke first, declare 
that on reflection he considered the return to the gold stand 
ard to have been rightl 

What is also forgotten about his tenure of the Exchequer 
is the great stride forward in social reform constituted by 
widows and orphans pensions. He carried through that 
measure in spite of the horribly costly General Strike a 
trial which helped to precipitate another and more pro 
longed trial, namely, the onset of a world-wide glut. This 
latter wholly unfamiliar phenomenon on so extensive a scale 
posed problems even more complex than those of scarcity. No 
British Government is more than partly responsible for the 
course of prices, and I have often wondered what Sir Win 
ston s Socialist critics would have done if such problems had 
faced them during their tenure of office. When Napoleon 
was asked what quality he sought in a general he replied 



22 A CHURCHILL READER 

"Luck!" Certainly nobody without luck can consistently be 
a Napoleon. As Chancellor of the Exchequer, Sir Winston 
had no luck at all. 

So much for the famous "inconsistency" of party or of per 
formance. In no party and in no performance has anybody 
ever accused Sir Winston of being short of ideas. His judg 
ment has indeed been questioned by Mr. Neville Cham 
berlain; and the reason for these questionings may be found 
in his own remark: "I have a tendency, against which I 
should, perhaps, be on my guard, to swim against the stream." 
Sometimes, of course, the stream is right as it was on the 
question of the abdication, or (at least, so it seems to me) on 
the question of Indian self-government. But sometimes also 
the swimmer against it has been right. For example, he was 
a thousand times right in urging the forcing of the Darda 
nelles in 1915; and (as I have hinted earlier) I fancy there is 
nothing in his whole career, not even the defeat of his Gov 
ernment in the General Election of 1945, which has left be 
hind it such a taste and tang of bitterness as the frustration 
by fate and fools of the Gallipoli expedition. Again, he was 
all too right about the menace of Hitler, though in that case 
the current against him was not a stream, but a tide; and, like 
a tide, it turned. I shall always think that this period in his 
career was in many respects his "finest hour." Nobody who 
has not had the experience can imagine how unpleasant it is 
to face a hostile House of Commons, savagely resolved to shout 
or sneer one into silence. 

Forgiveness to the injured doth belong, 

But he ne er pardons who has done the wrong. 

When the House is determined to be wrong it cannot for 
give anybody who persists in proving that it is wrong. The 



INTRODUCTION 23 

hostile atmosphere of Westminster spreads through the press 
and the public, like the smell of cooking through a boarding- 
house. The only doubtful question about the object of this 
hostility is whether he is more knave or fool; and it becomes 
as hard for him to stage a comeback as for a discredited pu 
gilist. For some six years Sir Winston was exposed to this all- 
pervasive hostility. He never winced or wilted. That alone 
would establish his claim to be a statesman. 

But, after all, it is the man behind all these manifestations 
of the man who is the most interesting. About the man 
and the boy, too there is one outstanding characteristic, 
namely, a zest for living which has become all too rare in 
these harassed times. "Twenty to twenty-five! Those are the 
years!" says Sir Winston himself. But nobody has less reason 
to sigh over the days that have fled; for the vital spark that 
coruscates so splendidly in youth has, in his case, continued to 
sparkle past the allotted span. 

It seems hard to recapture, in days when danger is faced no 
less firmly but far more as a duty, the spirit which was drawn 
to face danger for its own sake, as steel is drawn to a magnet. 
I would not disparage the modern generation. Indeed, theirs 
may well be the truer courage, when they face unflinchingly 
perils about which, at first hand or vicariously, they know all, 
so that the glamour has departed and only the hard skeleton 
of horror remains. Nevertheless, the panache of the pre-1914 
generation of young men was attractive; and those who regret 
its passing may find the gist of it in Sir Winston. The reader 
may take exception to the choice of a French term to describe 
the chief characteristic of an Englishman. But it is not inap 
propriate to Sir Winston, whose French vocabulary is exten 
sive and whose French accent is something all his own. 

For the greater part of his career he displayed a certain 
inclination towards France. No Englishman has expressed a 



24 A CHURCHILL READER 

more brilliant and generous understanding of French achieve 
ments and failures; and if he has been greatly saddened by a 
certain lack of resilience since the war, he has never fallen 
into the kind of contemptuous snorting about French insta 
bility to which some others are prone. 

Indeed, he is singularly objective towards all foreigners, 
and particularly towards those who put up a good show, 
whether as allies or as enemies. The first strong stroke which 
he made against any stream was an appreciative remark about 
the Boers then in arms against us. Possibly as a result of 
attending the Kaiser s army manoeuvres, he has never been 
very partial towards the Germans the cloven hoof, so to say, 
showed too much through the "shining armour" but even 
in their case his book on the 1914-18 war ends with a sonorous 
catalogue of their efforts and the appeal, "Surely, Germans, 
for history it is enough," Even in respect of the Russians, 
whose Communism evoked some of his most sulphurous ful- 
minations, he never hesitated a moment when Hitler attacked 
them in 1941. He never held the foolish theory that it was 
practicable to expect the Germans and the Russians to exhaust 
each other. So, in June 1941, he acted at once on the princi 
ple which he once defined as "if Hitler invaded Hell, I would 
make at least a favourable reference to the Devil in the House 
of Commons/ 7 

How does he rank as a soldier? I do not mean as the pert 
and pushing subaltern, who pulled strings to get into action 
and used pens to describe it both in a shockingly successful 
way. I mean as a strategist, whether at the Admiralty in the 
First World War or as Minister of Defence and Prime Min 
ister in the second. As for 1914-18, something has already 
been said about the Dardanelles; and Sir Winston s share in 
the development of the tank may be added to his claims to 
fame during that period. They were indeed endorsed by the 
simple fact that when, in 1939, he returned to the Admiralty 



INTRODUCTION 25 

on the outbreak of war an exhilarated whisper ran round the 
Navy: "Winnie is back." 

During the last war the test was, of course, much sterner. 
It will, I think, be admitted that the main strategic decisions 
all through were his. At least (to echo Marshal Joffre s reply 
to the question who won the Battle of the Marne), the blame 
if these decisions had been wrong would have been laid upon 
him; and there were occasionally whimsical or malicious 
whispers that he fancied himself to be the reincarnation of 
Marlborough. Moreover, war, in our country and under our 
Constitution, is run by a committee composed wholly or 
mainly of civilians over which the Prime Minister presides; 
and the decisions of committees over which Sir Winston 
presides are liable to be Sir Winston s. He was not, like Hit 
ler, surrounded by mere toadies, and it is not suggested that 
Cabinet meetings were occasions for burning incense before 
"the greatest strategic genius of all time." I only mean that, 
though the team was good, he was the undisputed captain 
of it. 

But there is another feature of our constitutional practice, 
which has developed through subcommittees of the Commit 
tee of Imperial Defence, namely, that the committee of civil 
ians never acts without the advice of military experts. That 
does not diminish their responsibility; and when the experts 
disagree, as they sometimes do, the civilians have to decide. 
I mention the experts particularly because Sir Winston was 
always extremely sensitive to their advice perhaps this sen 
sitiveness was a reaction from the Dardanelles experience. 
He worked them hard. He worked them at queer hours, 
because of his practice of taking a nap in the afternoons and 
of being particularly active through a large part of the night. 
But he listened to them. Unlike Hitler, he was not guided 
purely by his intuition. 

Such is the background to the great strategic decisions of 



26 A CHURCHILL READER 

the war. Let us list some of them. I do not include the deci 
sion to fight on alone after the fall of France, because if ever 
there was a decision of a whole nation and not of any man or 
group in it, that was the one. Indeed, Sir Winston himself 
has said of the first Cabinet meeting over which he presided 
that if anybody had even hinted at anything like giving in, 
that person would have been torn to pieces. But no similar 
prejudgment governed the decision to send our first, and at 
that time our only, armoured division to Africa in the autumn 
of 1940 instead of keeping it at home; nor the refusal to open 
a Second Front in Europe until it could be more than a for 
lorn hope; nor the steady devotion of so much of our resources 
(though not as much as Air-Marshal Harris wanted) to build 
ing up the bomber offensive. These were crucial decisions; 
and they were sound, marked alike by daring and by discern 
ment. Moreover, as we now know from the last volumes of his 
War Memoirs, some of his ideas which did not prevail were as 
sound as those which did. For example, he wanted an attain 
able, complete, and early victory in Italy rather than a proble 
matically useful invasion of southern France in 1944; and he 
urged vehemently in 1945 that the Allies should not sur 
render Central Germany to the Soviets before a long-term 
agreement had been achieved with Russia. The first idea 
might have given us an earlier peace; the second might have 
prevented the Cold War. 

Sir Winston is more than a descendant of the Duke of 
Marlborough. He is also half American; and it is perhaps 
from across the Atlantic that a touch of restlessness and even 
of flamboyance in him originates. But personally I consider 
all talk of national characteristics to be more or less rubbish; 
and if asked to place him in any special category, I should 
prefer the criterion to be a period rather than a country. In 
many ways he belongs to the second half of the eighteenth 
century, when, at least for a considerable part of society, life 



INTRODUCTION 27 

was brilliant and assured and ideas fresh and blazing. There 
should be nothing offensive in talking about a "governing 
class" in a country where entry into it is open to all classes. 
Some are qualified, others qualify for it; and it is stupid to say 
that only those who qualify for it, without originally belong 
ing to it, should govern. Well, Sir Winston does belong to it. 
He would have qualified if he had not belonged, but belong 
to it he does, not because of his birth, or even his cigars, but 
because of his temperament. He was certainly born in the 
political purple, but he wears it as to the manner born, and 
not all sons of famous fathers can say that. 

That temperament has, admittedly, the defects of its quali 
ties. A man who knows what he wants and thinks it natural 
that he should get it is not a good listener. It is not only fools 
that he does not suffer gladly. Or to put the same point in 
another way when ideas and arguments boil and bubble up 
ceaselessly in a human brain its possessor is liable to sweep 
aside any interruption. You can turn off a tap, but not a 
spring. 

It is not that he resents interruption or opposition he 
just disregards them. Yet there are exceptions to this indiffer 
ence. I have heard it said that Sir Winston has had few inti 
mate friends, but there are certainly two who can rank as such. 
To the late Lord Birkenhead and to the late Field-Marshal 
Smuts he always listened, and that not merely because it 
tickled his fancy to have as a friend and counsellor his fiercest 
political adversary or one who was once his jailer. What he 
saw in F.E. was a vivid energy in the grand manner not unlike 
his own. What he saw in the Field-Marshal was the living 
embodiment of the virtues of the British system a man 
once in arms against the British Empire and thereafter its 
most loyal supporter. As has already been mentioned, Sir 
Winston is half American, but in his love for things British, 
in veneration for British traditions, and in admiration for 



28 A CHURCHILL READER 

British achievements, he is the most English soul alive. 

You can think your own people have a lot to teach others 
without assuming that others have nothing to teach them. 
You can love old things without loving old ways. Sir Winston 
can certainly be moved by the spectacle or memory of ma 
jestic events and institutions. The cynic may think that he 
regards the twentieth century too much through spectacles of 
the eighteenth. But he can also be moved by very humble 
and modern things. For example, one of the things which 
moved him most during the war was the attitude of the people 
when he passed among them after, and sometimes during, bad 
raids. "What an imperial race!" he exclaimed on one occa 
sion when, as he himself told the House of Commons, people 
emerged from the wreck of their homes to cry, "We can take 
it!" and also "Give it em back!" 

He is, after all, like them himself. All his life he has taken 
it, and also given it back. He has sought colour in life and he 
has found it, whether dark or bright. The prayer in history 
which suits him best is surely the prayer of La Hire: "Sir God, 
I pray you to do to La Hire as La Hire would do to you if you 
were La Hire and La Hire were God." 

The message in history which fits him best Js perhaps that 
which Michael Collins sent on the eve of his assassination, 
and which many other men in many other contexts have 
echoed: "Tell Winston we could never have done anything 
without him." 

It would be fitting to close this account of a master of the 
English tongue by singling out from the magnificent diapason 
of English verse a note appropriate to his life and character. 
Shelley supplies it. 

To suffer ills which hope thinks infinite; 

To forgive wrongs, blacker than death or might; 



INTRODUCTION 29 

To defy power which seems omnipotent; 
To love and bear; to hope, till hope creates 
Of its own self the thing it contemplates. 
Never to change, nor falter, nor repent; 
This, like thy glory, Titan, is to be 
Great, good, and joyous; beautiful and free 
This is alone Life, Joy, Empire, and Victory. 



On Himself 



This chapter begins with certain general principles which 
have governed Sir Winston Churchill s actions, and then 
gives his own comments on major events in his life, roughly 
in chronological order. 

I HAVE a tendency against which I should, perhaps, be on my 
guard, to swim against the stream. 

At all times, according to my lights and throughout the 
changing scenes through which we are all hurried, I have 
always faithfully served t\vo public causes which, I think, 
stand supreme the maintenance of the enduring greatness 
of Britain and her Empire, and the historical continuity of: 
our island life. 

On accepting the leadership of 
the Conservative Party, Oc 
tober 1940 

[It must be remembered that Sir Winston had throughout his 
life been unpopular among a large section of that party, and 
never more so than when he was fighting appeasement.] 



O N H I MSELF 31 

Looking back with after-knowledge and increasing years, 
I seem to have been too ready to undertake tasks which were 
hazardous or even forlorn. 

"The World Crisis" written 
in 1923 

[There were still in store a few similar tasks for him to 
undertake.] 

Everybody threw the blame on me. I have noticed that 
they nearly always do. I suppose it is because they think I 
shall be able to bear it best. 

"Amid These Storms" 

Because I show robust energy, it does not follow that I have 
a sensitive or injured disposition. 

Speech in the House, April 
23, 1953 

[Mr. Shinwell had asked whether Sir Winston was in a better 
temper than he was earlier in the day.] 

I am certainly not one of those who need to be prodded. 
In fact, if anything, I am the prod. 

Speech in the House, Novem 
ber 11, 1942 

I have been brought up and trained to have the utmost 
contempt for people who get drunk. 

"Amid These Storms" 

I neither want it nor need it, but I should think it pretty 
hazardous to interfere with the ineradicable habit of a life 
time. 

"Time," July 6, 1953 



32 A CHURCHILL READER 

[Sir Winston had asked Lord Moran, his doctor, whether a 
Cointreau was permitted after lunch. Lord Moran said, 
"Do you want it or do you need it?"] 

I always avoid prophesying beforehand, because it is much 
better policy to prophesy after the event has already taken 
place. 

Cairo, Press Conference, Feb 
ruary 1, 1943 

I am by no means sure I have been right. It is no part of 
my case that I am always right. 

Speech in the House, May 21, 
1952 

My views are a harmonious process which keeps them in 
relation to the current movement of events, 

Speech in the House, May 5, 
1952 

I give my opinion. I dare say it will weigh as much as a 
mocking giggle, 

Speech in the House, 1944, 
when jeered at for his refer 
ence to Prince Umber to 

I never take pleasure in human woe, 

Glasgow, April 17, 1953 

I will not pretend that, if I had to choose between Com 
munism and Nazi-ism, I would choose Communism. I hope 
not to be called upon to survive in the world under a Govern 
ment of either of those dispensations. 

Speech in the House, April 14, 
1937 



ON HIMSELF 33 

Personally I am always ready to learn, although I do not 
always like being taught. 

Speech in the House, Novem 
ber 4, 1952 

I can practise, in an honorary fashion, the arts of surgery 
and medicine. Unless there is a very marked shortage of 
capable men in both these professions, I shall not press myself 
upon you. No doubt in these difficult times it will be a com 
fort not only to the profession but to the nation at large that 
you have me in reserve. I have not yet taken any final de 
cision as to which of those beneficent branches I should give 
priority (in case an emergency arises). Being tempera 
mentally inclined to precision and a sharp edge, it might be 
thought that I should choose the surgeon s role. 

London, July 10, 1951 

I was once asked to devise an inscription for a monument 
in France. I wrote "In war, Resolution. In defeat, Defiance. 
In victory, Magnanimity. In Peace, Goodwill." The in 
scription was not accepted. 

"Amid These Storms" 
(published in 1932) 

[It is interesting to note that Sir Winston has used this in 
scription, eighteen years after he had first composed it, for 
the moral of his work The Second World War the first 
volume of which appeared in 1948.] 

I have always urged fighting wars and other contentions 
with might and main till overwhelming victory, and then 
offering the hand of friendship to the vanquished. Thus I 
have always been against the Pacifists during the quarrel, 
and against the Jingoes at its close. 

"Amid These Storms" 



34 A CHURCHILL READER 

I thought we ought to have conquered the Irish and then 
given them Home Rule; that we ought to have starved out 
the Germans and then revictualled their country; and that 
after smashing the General Strike, we should have met the 
grievances of the miners. I always get into trouble because 
so few people take this line. 

"Amid These Storms" 

My hate had died with their surrender. 

Triumph and Tragedy, "The 
Second World War," Vol. VI 

[On Germany.] 

If the worst came to the worst, I might have a shot at it 
myself. 

Reply to an Opposition re 
quest to name a Minister to 
speak on behalf of the Gov 
ernment 

I have no intention of passing my remaining years in ex 
plaining or withdrawing anything I have said in the past, 
still less in apologising for it. 

Speech in the House > April 21, 
1944 

This is the first time in my political life that I have kept 
quiet for so long. 

Margate, October 10, 



[This speech to the Conservative Party Conference was Sir 
Winston s first since his illness in May 1953 a period of 
five months enforced abstention from public speeches.] 



ON HIMSELF 35 

I was happy as a child with my toys in my nursery. I have 
been happier every year since I became a man. But this 
interlude of school makes a sombre grey patch upon the 
chart of my journey. 

"Amid These Storms" 

In all the twelve years I was at school no one ever succeeded 
in making me write a Latin verse or learn any Greek except 
the alphabet. 

"A mid These Storms" 

I never had the advantage of a university education. But 
it is a great privilege and the more widely extended, the 
better for any country. It should not be looked upon as 
something to end with youth but as a key to open many 
doors of thought and knowledge. A university education 
ought to be a guide to the reading of a lifetime. . . . One who 
has profited from university education has a wide choice. 
He need never be idle or bored. He is free from that vice 
of the modern age which requires something new not only 
every day but every two or three hours of the day. . . . The 
first duty of a university is to teach wisdom, not a trade; 
character, not technicalities. We want a lot of engineers in 
the modern world, but we do not want a world of engineers. 

Speech in the House, Septem 
ber 19, 1950 

I am surprised that in my later life I should have become 
so experienced in taking degrees when as a schoolboy I was 
so bad at passing examinations. In fact, one might almost 
say that no one ever passed so few examinations and received 
so many degrees. From this a superficial thinker might argue 
that the way to get the most degrees is to fail in the most 



36 A CHURCHILL READER 

examinations ... no boy or girl should ever be disheartened 
by lack of success in their youth but should diligently and 
faithfully continue to persevere and make up for lost time. 

Miami, U.S.A., February 26, 
1946 

There is a good saying to the effect that when a new book 
appears one should read an old one. As an author I would 
not recommend too strict an adherence to this saying. But I 
must admit that I have altered my views about the study of 
classical literature as I have grown older. At school I never 
liked it. I entirely failed to respond to the many pressing 
and sometimes painful exhortations which I received to 
understand the full charm and precision of the classic 
languages. But it seems to me that should the classic studies 
die out in Europe and in the modern world, a unifying 
influence of importance would disappear. 

Oslo, May 12, 194S 

I like the song "Boy," although when I was at School I did 
not advance to that position of authority which entitles one 
to make that call. 

Harrow School, December 8, 
1940 

[The reference is to the system under which upper school 
boys are allowed to use lower school boys as fags,] 

You have the songs of Bowen and Howson (whom I re 
member well as housemasters here) with the music of John 
Farmer and Eaton Fanning. They are wonderful; marvel 
lous; more than could be put into brick and mortar, or 
treasured in any trophies of silver or gold. They grow with 
the years. I treasure them and sing them with joy. 

Speech at Harrow, November 
19, 1942 



ON HIMSELF 37 

Hitler, in one of hi$ recent discourses, declared that the 
fight was between those who have been through the Adolf 
Hitler schools and those who have been at Eton. Hitler has 
forgotten Harrow. . . . 

Speech at Harrow, December 
18, 1940 

May I say with great respect and with the indulgence of 
the Committee, that I do not in the least mind being called 
a goose? I have been called many worse things than that. 

Speech in the House, Decem 
ber 3, 1952 

It took me three tries to pass into Sandhurst. 

"Amid These Storms" 

I resolved to read history, philosophy, economics, and 
things like that. . . . Without more ado I got out the eight 
volumes of Gibbon s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. 

"Amid These Storms" 

[Sir Winston explains how, when a subaltern at Bangalore, 
he began, to realise that polo was not everything.] 

I had a feeling once about Mathematics that I saw it all. 
Depth beyond Depth was revealed to me the Byss and 
Abyss. I saw as one might see the transit of Venus or 
even the Lord Mayor s Show a quantity passing through 
infinity and changing its sign from plus to minus. I saw 
exactly how it happened and why the tergiversation was 
inevitable but it was after dinner and I let it go. 

"Amid These Storms" 

Twenty to twenty-five! Those are the years! 

"A mid These Storms" 



38 A CHURCHILL READER 

So, at any rate, I had been "under fire." That was some 
thing. Nevertheless, I began to take a more thoughtful view 
of our enterprise than I had hitherto done. 

On first coming under fire in 
Cuba, 1895 

"I presume/ Lord Curzon said to me, "it will not be long 
before we hear you declaim in the House of Commons!" 
Though greatly hampered by inability to compose at the 
rate necessary for public speaking, I was strongly of the same 
opinion myself. 

"Great Contemporaries" The 
occasion was a visit to Cur 
zon as Viceroy 

The President of the Psychical Research Society extracted 
rather unseasonably a promise from me after dinner to "com 
municate" with him should anything unfortunate occur. 

"Amid These Storms" On 
leaving for Kitchener s army 
in the Sudan 

I, too, was proud of my prisoner until we reached the 
army. Then it appeared that ... he was a most important 
individual in the employ of the Intelligence Department 
who had been spying in Omdurman. . . . Naturally, several 
young gentlemen saw fit to be facetious on the subject. . . . 
Reuter s correspondent even proposed to telegraph some 
account of this noteworthy capture. But I prevailed on him 
not to do so, having a detestation of publicity. 

"River War; an Account of 
the Reconquest of the Sou 
dan 9 



ON HIMSELF 39 

He spoke nothing but Arabic; I knew only one word of 
that language. Still, we conversed fluently. By opening and 
shutting my mouth and pointing to my stomach, I excited his 
curiosity, if not his wonder. Then I employed the one and 
indispensable Arabic word "Backsheesh." After that, all 
difficulties melted away. 

"River War; an Account of 
the Reconquest of the 
Soudan" 

There are lots of people who have been employed in 
political office who have had professional military experience. 
Even I myself was nearly five years a cadet and a lieutenant 
in the Army and I have frequently interfered in civilian 
matters. 

Speech in the House, January 
30, 1952 

[Sir Winston was replying to questions upon appointing a 
Field-Marshal (Lord Alexander) to the post of Minister of 
Defence.] 

Certainly I have been fully qualified so far as the writing 
of books about wars is concerned; in fact, already in 1900, 
which is a long time ago, I could boast to have written as 
many books as Moses, and I have not stopped writing them 
since, except when momentarily interrupted by war, in all 
the intervening period. 

Royal United Services Institu 
tion, July 4, 1950 

I have been a journalist and half my lifetime I have earned 
my living by selling words and I hope thoughts. 

Ottawa, January 12, 1952 



40 A CHURCHILL READER 

I have consistently urged my friends to abstain from read 
ing it. 

On "Savrola/ f his first novel 
and his only one 

For my part, I consider that it will be found much better 
by all parties to leave the past to history, especially as I pro 
pose to write that history myself. 

Speech in the House, January 
23, 1948 

On the first night when I visited the wardroom the officers 
were singing songs. At the end they sang the chorus of "Rule, 
Britannia." I asked them what were the words. Nobody 
knew them. So I recited some of Thomson s noble lines 
myself. 

Triumph and Tragedy, "The 
Second World War," Vol. VI 

[On board the cruiser Enterprise on July 20, 1944, after visit 
to the Mulberry Harbours in Normandy*] 

The night was chilly. Colonel Byng and I shared a blanket. 
When he turned over I was in the cold. When I turned over 
I pulled the blanket off him and he objected. He was the 
Colonel. It was not a good arrangement. 

At Spion Kop with Colonel 
Byng later Lord Byng of 
Virny 

Keep cool, menl This will be interesting for my paper. 

[When the armoured train from Estcourt on which he was 
travelling as a war correspondent was ambushed by the 
Boers.] 



ON HIMSELF 41 

The best advice I got was from Mr. Henry Chaplin, who 
said to me in his rotund manner: "Don t be hurried! Unfold 
your case! If you have anything to say, the House will listen." 

On the birth-pangs of his 
maiden speech 

I am a child of the House o Commons. I was brought up 
in my father s house to believe in democracy. "Trust the 
people" was his message. ... In my country, as in yours, 
public men are proud to be servants of the State and would 
be ashamed to be its masters. 

Speech to the American Con 
gress, December 1941 

I am your servant, and you have the right to dismiss me 
when you please. What you have no right to do is to ask me 
to bear responsibilities without the power of effective action, 
to bear the responsibilities of Prime Minister but "clamped 
on each side by strong men." . . . 

The Hinge of Fate, "The Sec 
ond World War/ VoL IV 

[Towards the middle of 1942 there was some feeling in the 
House of Commons that Sir Winston was taking too much 
upon himself, and a Vote of Censure was moved by a few 
back-bench Conservatives. They explained that they did not 
want to dismiss him, but to limit his authority. However, all 
this disappeared with the Alamein victory in November.] 

... It was with some pride that I reminded my two great 
comrades on more than one occasion that I was the only one 
of our trinity who could at any moment be dismissed from 
power by the vote of a House of Commons freely elected on 
universal franchise, or could be controlled from day to day by 



42 A CHURCHILL READER 

the opinion of a War Cabinet representing all parties in the 
State. The President s term of office was fixed, and his 
powers not only as President but as Commander-in-Chief 
were almost absolute under the American Constitution. 
Stalin appeared to be, and at this moment certainly was, all- 
powerful in Russia. They could order; I had to convince and 
persuade. I was glad that this should be so. The process was 
laborious, but I had no reason to complain of the way it 
worked. 

Closing the Ring, " The Sec 
ond World War; 9 Vol. V 

I cannot help reflecting that if my father had been an 
American and my mother British, instead of the other way 
round, I might have got here on my own. 

Speech to the U.S. Congress, 
December 16, 1941 

I feel on both sides of the Atlantic. ... In my mother s 
birth city of Rochester, I hold a latch-key to American hearts. 

Speech in Rochester, U.S.A., 
June 1942 

My mother was American and my ancestors were officers in 
Washington s army. So I am myself an English-speaking 
union. 

[Quoted by Mr. Adlai Stevenson the Democratic Presidential 
Candidate at a reception of the English Speaking Union in 
London, July 29, 1953. Mr. Stevenson had had lunch earlier 
with Sir Winston at Chequers, and Mr. Stevenson told Sir 
Winston that he had to attend the reception later that day. 
Sir Winston then made the remark above.] 



ON HIMSELF 43 

I am very glad the House has allowed me after an interval 
of fifteen years to lift again the tattered flag I found lying on 
a stricken field. 

Speech in the House, 1901 

[Sir Winston is referring to his father s fight for economy in 
the Services, which ended in defeat and resignation. Economy 
was the text of this, one of the earliest speeches, of his son.] 

It is easy for an individual to move through those in 
sensible gradations from left to right, but the act of crossing 
the floor [i.e., changing one s political party] is one that 
requires serious consideration. I am well informed on the 
matter, for I have accomplished that difficult process not only 
once, but twice. 

All the years that I have been in the House of Commons 
I have always said to myself one thing: "Do not interrupt," 
and I have never been able to keep to that resolution. 

Speech in the House, July 10, 
1935 

I now (as Home Secretary in 1911) signed general warrants 
authorising the examination of all the correspondence of 
particular people upon a list, to which additions were con 
tinually being made. This soon disclosed a regular and 
extensive system of German-paid British agents. [The field 
of preparation], once I got drawn in, dominated all other 
interests in my mind. For seven years I could think of little 
else ... all the war cries of our election struggles began to 
seem unreal. . . . Only Ireland held her place among the grim 
realities. No doubt other Ministers had similar mental ex 
periences. I am telling my own tale. 

"The World Crisis 9 



44 A CHURCHILL READER 

When I think of the fate of poor old women, so many of 
whom have no one to look after them and nothing to live 
on at the end of their lives, I am glad to have had a hand in 
all that structure of pensions and insurance which no other 
country can rival and which is especially a help to them. 

"Amid These Storms" 

[The reference is to Sir Winston s championship of social 
insurance almost from his entry into politics to his Widows, 
Orphans, and Old Age Contributory Pensions Act, 1928.] 

Don t get torpedoed; for if I am left alone your colleagues 
will eat me. 

Letter to Mr. Lloyd George in 
1916, when latter was pro 
posing to go on a visit to 
Russia 

[Sir Winston was, at the time, still in bad odour with the 
Conservatives.] 

I am finished, 

To Lord Riddell, in losing his 
position at the Admiralty in 
1915 

Political dramas are very exciting at the time to those 
engaged in the clatter and whirlpool of politics, but I can 
truthfully affirm that I never felt resentment, still less pain, 
at being so decisively discarded in a moment of national 
stress. 

The Gathering Storm, "The 
Second World War/ Vol. I 



ONHIMSELF 45 

[Upon his not being asked to take part in the National Coali 
tion Government, 1931-35.] 

I have myself some ties with Scotland which are to me of 
great significance ties precious and lasting. First of all, I 
decided to be born on St. Andrew s Day and it was to 
Scotland I went to find my wife. ... I commanded a Scottish 
battalion of the famous 21st Regiment for five months in the 
line in France in the last war. I sat for fifteen years as the 
representative of "Bonnie Dundee," and I might be sitting 
for it still if the matter had rested entirely with me. 

Edinburgh, October 12, 1942 

[Lady Churchill was Miss Clementine Hozier. Sir Winston 
was defeated in Dundee at the General Election of 1922.] 

I will never stifle myself in such a moral and intellectual 
sepulchre. 

[On the Bonar Law Government of 1922, with its policy 
allegedly reactionary.] 

I am without an office, without a seat, without a party, and 
without an appendix. 

After his defeat at Dundee in 
1922 

[Mr. Churchill had been operated upon for appendicitis just 
before the contest, and had quarrelled with both the Liberal 
and Conservative parties over their refusal to continue the 
Coalition.] 

I was surprised, and the Conservative Party dumbfounded, 
when he invited me to become Chancellor of the Exchequer, 
the office which my father had once held. 

The Gathering Storm, "The 
Second World War," Vol. I 



46 A CHURCHILL READER 

[Sir Winston was appointed Chancellor by Mr. Baldwin in 
his 1924-29 Government] 



The years from 1931 to 1935, apart from my anxiety on 
public affairs, were personally very pleasant to me. I earned 
my livelihood by dictating articles which had a wide circula 
tion not only in Great Britain and the United States, but also, 
before Hitler s shadow fell upon them, in the most famous 
newspapers of sixteen European countries. I lived, in fact, 
from mouth to hand. I produced in succession the various 
volumes of the Life of Marlborough. I meditated constantly 
upon the European situation and the rearming of Germany. 
I lived mainly at Chartwell, where I had much to amuse me. 
I built with my own hands a large part of two cottages and 
extensive kitchen-garden walls, and made all kinds of rock 
eries and waterworks and a large swimming-pool which was 
filtered to limpidity and could be heated to supplement our 
fickle sunshine. Thus I never had a dull or idle moment 
from morning till midnight, and with my happy family 
around me dwelt at peace within my habitation. 

The Gathering Storm, "The 
Second World War," Vol. I 

In 1930, when I was out of office, I accepted for the first 
and only time in my life a directorship. It was in one of the 
subsidiary companies of Lord Inchcape s far-spreading or 
ganisation of the Peninsular and Oriental shipping lines. 
For eight years I regularly attended the monthly board meet 
ings, and discharged my duties with care. 

The Grand Alliance, "The 
Second World War," Vol. 
Ill 



ON HIMSELF 47 

There was a moment . . . o a world aglare, of a man aghast. 
... I do not understand why I was not broken like an egg 
shell or squashed like a gooseberry. 

On being run down by a taxi 
in New York, 1931 

I was eleven years a fairly solitary figure in this House and 
pursued my way in patience; and so there may be hope for 
the hon. Member. 

Retort to Mr. Gallacher, the 
solitary Communist M.P., 
December 8, 1944 

[Sir Winston was teasing Mr. Gallacher on his failure to gain 
support in the House.] 

I suppose they asked me to show him that, if they couldn t 
bark themselves, they kept a dog who could bark and might 
bite. 

Remark upon being invited by 
the Chamberlain Cabinet to 
meet von Ribbentrop, when 
the latter was German Am 
bassador 

It was my duty as Home Secretary more than a quarter of 
a century ago to stand beside His Majesty and proclaim his 
style and titles at his investiture as Prince of Wales. ... I 
should have been ashamed if, in my independent and un 
official position, I had not cast about for every lawful means, 
even the most forlorn, to keep him on the Throne of his 
fathers. 

Speech in the House of Com 
mons on the abdication of 
Edward VIII 



48 A CHURCHILL READER 

[The point is that Sir Winston had been accused, not openly, 
but in the miasmic coulisses of politics, of wanting to form a 
King s Party with himself at its head, and to climb back into 
power on the shoulders of a crisis. This was a loathsome 
slander. Sir Winston was animated by personal and senti 
mental memories, and by them alone.] 



To be so entirely convinced and vindicated in a matter 
of life and death to one s country, and not to be able to make 
Parliament and the nation heed the warning, or bow to the 
proof by taking action, was an experience most painful. 

The Gathering Storm, "The 
Second World War/ Vol. I 

No one had ever been over the same terrible course twice 
with such an interval between. No one had felt its dangers 
and responsibilities from the summit as I had or, to descend 
to a small point, understood how First Lords of the Ad 
miralty are treated when great ships are sunk and things go 
wrong. If we were in fact going over the same cycle a second 
time, should I have once again to endure the pangs of dis 
missal? ... I could feel that I had effectively taken over the 
great Department which I knew so well and loved with a 
discriminating eye. I now knew what there was in hand and 
on the way. I knew where everything was. I had visited all 
the principal naval ports and met all the Commanders-in- 
Chief. By the Letters Patent constituting the Board, the 
First Lord is "responsible to Crown and Parliament for all 
the business of the Admiralty/* and I certainly felt prepared 
to discharge that duty in fact as well as in form. 

The Gathering Storm, "The 
Second World War," Vol. I 



ONHIMSELF 49 

[Reflections upon taking over the duties of First Lord of the 
Admiralty for the second time in 1939.] 

When in 1940 the chief responsibility fell upon me and 
our national survival depended upon victory in the air, I 
had the advantage of a layman s insight into the problems of 
air warfare resulting from four long years of study and 
thought based upon the fullest official and technical informa 
tion. Although I have never tried to be learned in technical 
matters, this mental field was well lit for me. I knew the 
various pieces and the moves on the board, and could under 
stand anything I was told about the game. 

The Gathering Storm, "The 
Second World War/ Vol. I 

[Sir Winston became a member of the Air Ministry and Air 
Defence Committee in July 1935 at the request of the then 
Prime Minister, Mr. Baldwin.] 

In my long political experience I had held most of the 
great offices of State, but I readily admit that the post which 
had now fallen to me was the one I liked the best. Power, for 
the sake of lording it over fellow-creatures or adding to per 
sonal pomp, is rightly judged base. But power in a national 
crisis, when a man believes he knows what orders should be 
given, is a blessing. In any sphere of action there can be no 
comparison between the positions of number one and num 
bers two, three, or four. The duties and problems of all 
persons other than number one are quite different and in 
many ways more difficult. It is always a misfortune when 
number two or three has to initiate a dominant plan or policy. 
He has to consider not only the merits of the policy, but the 
mind of his chief; not only what to advise, but what it is 



50 A CHURCHILL READER 

proper for him in his station to advise; not only what to do, 
but how to get it agreed, how to get it done. Moreover, 
number two or three will have to reckon with numbers four, 
five and six, or maybe some bright outsider, number twenty. 
Ambition, not so much for vulgar ends, but for fame, glints 
in every mind. There are always several points of view 
which may be right, and many which are plausible. I was 
ruined for the time being in 1915 over the Dardanelles, and 
a supreme enterprise was cast away, through my trying to 
carry out a major and cardinal operation of war from a sub 
ordinate position. Men are ill-advised to try such ventures. 
This lesson had sunk into my nature. 

At the top there are great simplifications. An accepted 
leader has only to be sure of what it is best to do, or at least 
to have made up his mind about it. The loyalties which 
centre upon number one are enormous. If he trips he must 
be sustained. If he makes mistakes they must be covered. If 
he sleeps he must not be wantonly disturbed. If he is no 
good he must be pole-axed. But this last extreme process 
cannot be carried out every day; and certainly not in the days 
just after he has been chosen. 

Their Finest Hour, "The Sec 
ond World War; VoL II 

[Upon becoming Prime Minister for first time in May 1940.] 

When I xvas called upon to be Prime Minister, now nearly 
two years ago, there were not many applicants for the job. 
Since then perhaps the market has improved. 

Speech in the House, January 
1942 

It had many defects and teething troubles, and when these 
became apparent the tank was appropriately rechristened 



ONHIMSELF 51 

the "Churchill/* These defects have now been largely over 
come. 

Speech in the House, July 2, 
1942 

I am invited under the threats of unpopularity to vic 
timise the Chancellor of the Duchy (Mr. Duff Cooper) and 
throw him to the wolves. I say to those who make this 
amiable suggestion ... "I much regret that I am unable to 
gratify your wishes," or words to that effect. 

Speech in the House, January 
1942 

[It had been sought to make Mr. Duff Cooper (the late Lord 
Norwich), sent on a special mission to Singapore, responsi 
ble for the early disasters in the Japanese war. Sir Winston 
has always refused to hear a word against either Mr. Duff 
Cooper or Mr. Eden, chiefly, I think, because of their revolt 
against the Chamberlain appeasement policy.] 

I was the most miserable Englishman in America since 
Burgoyne. 

On receiving the news of the 
fall of Tobruk, June 1942, 
when on a visit to Washing 
ton 

... on the night of the tenth of May (1940) ... I acquired 

the chief power in the State I was conscious of a profound 

sense of relief. At last I had the authority to give directions 
over the whole scene. I felt as if I were walking with destiny, 
and that all my past life had been but a preparation for this 
hour and for this trial. Eleven years in the political wilder 
ness had freed me from ordinary Party antagonisms. ... I 



52 A CHURCHILL READER 

thought I knew a good deal about it all, and I was sure I 
should not fail. Therefore, although impatient for the 
morning, I slept soundly and had no need for cheering 
dreams. Facts are better than dreams. 

The Gathering Storm, "The 
Second World War/ Vol. I 

A man who has to play an effective part in taking, with the 
highest responsibility, grave and terrible decisions of war may 
need the refreshment of adventure. He may need also the 
comfort that when sending so many others to their death he 
may share in a small way their risks. His field of personal 
interest, and consequently his forces of action, are stimulated 
by direct contact with the event. As a result of what I saw 
and learned in the First World War, I was convinced that 
generals and other high commanders should try from time 
to time to see the conditions and aspect of the battle scene 
themselves. I had seen many grievous errors made through 
the silly theory that valuable lives should not be endangered. 
No one was more careful of his personal safety than I was, but 
I thought my view and theme of the war were sufficiently 
important and authoritative to entitle me to full freedom 
of judgment as to how I discharged my task in such a per 
sonal matter. 

Closing the Ring, " The Sec 
ond World War/ Vol. V 

I had to ask myself the question [taking the leadership of 
the Conservative Party in 1940] about which there may 
still be various opinions whether the Leadership of one 
great party was compatible with the position I held from 
King and Parliament as Prime Minister of an Administration 
composed of, and officially supported by, all parties. I had 



ON HIMSELF 53 

no doubt about the answer. The Conservative Party possessed 
a very large majority in the House of Commons over all other 
parties combined. Owing to the war conditions no election 
appeal to the nation was available in case of disagreement or 
deadlock. I should have found it impossible to conduct the 
war if I had had to procure the agreement in the compulsive 
days of crisis and during long years of adverse and baffling 
struggle not only of the Leaders of the two minority parties 
but of the Leader of the Conservative majority. Whoever had 
been chosen and whatever his self-denying virtues, he would 
have had the real political power. For me there would have 
been only the executive responsibility. 

Their Finest Hour, "The Sec 
ond World War; 9 Vol. II 

I knew nothing about science, but I knew something of 
scientists, and had had much practice as a Minister in 
handling things I did not understand. I had, at any rate, an 
acute military perception of what would help and what 
would hurt, or what would cure and of what would kill. 

Their Finest Hour, "The Sec 
ond World War/ Vol. II 

[Sir Winston was the first to associate scientists with the con 
struction of national policy. He had consulted from about 
1935 onwards with an old friend, Professor Lindemann, 
holder of the Chair of Experimental Philosophy at Oxford. 
Throughout the war, Professor Lindemann was his personal 
scientific adviser. After the election of 1951, the Professor 
(now Lord Cherwell) became a member of the Cabinet.] 

I saw therefore that I should have to strive my utmost to 
keep pace with the generation now in power and with fresh 



54 A CHURCHILL READER 

young giants who might at any time appear. In this I relied 
upon knowledge as well as upon all possible zeal and mental 
energy. 

For this purpose I had recourse to a method of life which 
had been forced upon me at the Admiralty in 1 9 14 and 1915, 
and which I found greatly extended my daily capacity for 
work. I always went to bed at least for one hour as early as 
possible in the afternoon and exploited to the full my happy 
gift of falling almost immediately into deep sleep. By this 
means I was able to press a day and a half s work into one. 
Nature had not intended mankind to work from eight in the 
morning until midnight without that refreshment of blessed 
oblivion which, even if it only lasts twenty minutes, is suffi 
cient to renew all the vital forces. I regretted having to send 
myself to bed like a child every afternoon, but I was re 
warded by being able to work through the night until two 
or even later sometimes much later in the morning, and 
begin the new day between eight and nine o clock. This 
routine I observed throughout the war, and I commend it 
to others if and when they find it necessary for a long spell to 
get the last scrap out of the human structure. 

The Gathering Storm, "The 
Second World War; Vol. I 

I do not think any expression of scorn or severity which I 
have heard used by our critics has come anywhere near the 
language which I have been myself accustomed to use, not 
only orally, but in a stream of written minutes. In fact, I 
wonder that a great many of my colleagues arc on speaking 
terms with me. 

Speech in the Home, June 25, 
1941 

If I am accused of this mistake, I can only say with M. 



ON HIMSELF 55 

Clemenceau on a celebrated occasion: "Perhaps I have made 
a number of other mistakes of which you have not heard." 

Speech in the House, Novem 
ber 12, 1944 

More difficulty and toil are often incurred in overcoming 
opposition and adjusting divergent and conflicting views 
than by having the right to give decisions oneself. It is most 
important that at the summit there should be one mind 
playing over the whole field, faithfully aided and corrected, 
but not divided in its integrity. I should not of course have 
remained Prime Minister for an hour if I had been deprived 
of the office of Minister of Defence. 

The Hinge of Fate, "The Sec 
ond World War," Vol. IV 

All my work had come to me hour by hour at the Annexe, 
and I had maintained my usual output though feeling far 
from well. But now I became aware of a marked reduction in 
the number of papers which reached me. When I protested, 
the doctors, supported by my wife, argued that I ought to 
quit my work entirely. I would not agree to this. What 
should I have done all day? They then said I had pneu 
monia, to which I replied, "Well, surely you can deal with 
that. Don t you believe in your new drug?" Doctor Marshall 
said he called pneumonia "the old man s friend." "Why?" I 
asked. "Because it takes them off so quietly." I made a suit 
able reply, but we reached an agreement on the following 
lines. I was only to have the most important and interesting 
papers sent me, and to read a novel. I chose Moll Flanders, 
about which I had heard excellent accounts, but had not 
found time to test them. On this basis I passed the next week 
in fever and discomfort, and I sometimes felt very ill. 

The Hinge of Fate, "The Sec 
ond World War," Vol. IV 



56 A CHURCHILL READER 

A gentleman, Mr. Thomson, kindly presented me with a 
lion . . . "Rota" was the lion s name. . . . He was a male lion 
of fine quality and in eight years became the father of many 
children. The assistant secretary who had been with me in 
the airplane came with some papers. He was a charming man, 
highly competent, but physically on the small side. Indulg 
ing in chaff, I now showed him a magnificent photograph of 
"Rota* with his mouth open, saying, "If there are any short 
comings in your work I shall send you to him. Meat is very 
short now/ He took a serious view of this remark. He re 
ported to the office that I was in a delirium. 

The Hinge of Fate, "The Sec 
ond World War," Vol. IV 

[This was when Sir Winston had pneumonia in February, 
1943.] 

It is indeed remarkable that I was not in this bleak lull 
dismissed from power, or confronted with demands for 
changes in my methods, which it was known I should never 
accept. I should then have vanished from the scene with a 
load of calamity on my shoulders, and the harvest, at last to 
be reaped, would have been ascribed to my belated disap 
pearance. For indeed the whole aspect of the war was about 
to be transformed. Henceforward increasing success, marred 
hardly by a mishap, was to be our lot. I was not denied the 
right to share in this new phase of the war. ... All this shows 
how much luck there is in human affairs, and how little we 
should worry about anything else except doing our best. 

The Hinge of Fate, "The Sec- 
ond World War," Vol IV 

[Sir Winston was reflecting upon die fact that for twenty- 
eight months while he was at head of affairs we had sustained 



ON HIMSELF 57 

unbroken military defeats. We were, he said, alive and at 
bay; but that was all.] 

I did not suffer from any desire to be relieved of my re 
sponsibilities. All I wanted was compliance with my wishes 
after reasonable discussion. 

The Hinge of Fate, "The Sec 
ond World War; Vol. IV 

[On suggestions in February 1942 that the Prime Minister 
had too much to do and that he should have been relieved 
of some of the burdens that fell upon him.] 

Now for a short spell I became "the man on the spot." 
Instead of sitting at home waiting for the news from the front 
I could send it myself. This was exhilarating. 

The Hinge of Fate, "The Sec 
ond World War/ Vol. IV 

[On visit to Cairo and Middle East, July 1942.] 

This was a memorable occasion in my life. On my right 
sat the President of the United States, on my left the master 
of Russia. Together we controlled a large preponderance 
of the naval and three-quarters of all the air forces in the 
world, and could direct armies of nearly twenty millions of 
men, engaged in the most terrible of wars that had yet oc 
curred in human history. 

Closing the Ring, " The Sec 
ond World War," Vol. V 

[On Teheran Conference.] 

I ... insist . . . that I be host at dinner tomorrow evening. 
I think I have one or two claims to precedence. To begin 



58 A CHURCHILL READER 

with, I come first in seniority and alphabetically. In the 
second place, I represent the longest established of the three 
governments. And, in the third place, tomorrow happens 
to be my birthday. 

Quoted by Robert E. Sher 
wood in the White House 
Papers of Harry Hopkins 

[At the Teheran Conference in November-December 1943 
Sir Winston suggested that he and President Roosevelt have 
lunch together before the second Plenary session. Roosevelt 
declined as he did not want the report spread that he and 
Sir Winston were hatching their own schemes without Russia. 
Sir Winston made the above remark to Mr. Averell Harri- 
man, who brought the President s message.] 

On the way out from the dining-room I did a very foolish 
thing. I saw before me five yards away the two formidable 
guardians (of Marshal Tito) who had once again been ex 
cluded. I have a very large oblong gold cigar case which 
belonged to Lord Birkenhead and was given to me by his 
family after his death. This was in my right-hand pocket. I 
grasped it firmly and marched towards them. Arrived within 
two yards I drew it from my pocket as if it were a pistol. 
Luckily they grinned with delight and we made friends. But 
I do not recommend such procedure in similar cases. 

Triumph and Tragedy, "The 
Second World War/ Vol. VI 

[Sir Winston was entertaining Marshal Tito at dinner at 
Naples on August 13, 1944. The Marshal was accompanied 
by two "ferocious-looking" bodyguards, who were excluded 
from all meetings which the Marshal attended.] 



ONHIMSELF 59 

Be on your guard! I am going to speak in French a for 
midable undertaking and one which will put great demands 
upon your friendship for Great Britain. 

Speech in Paris after the Lib 
eration of France 

The United States stood on the scene of victory, master of 
world fortunes, but without a true and coherent design. 
Britain, though still very powerful, could not act decisively 
alone. I could at this stage only warn and plead. Thus this 
climax of apparently measureless success was to me a most 
unhappy time. I moved amid cheering crowds, or sat at a 
table adorned with congratulations and blessings from every 
part of the Grand Alliance, with an aching heart and a mind 
oppressed by forebodings. 

Triumph and Tragedy, "The 
Second World War/ Vol. VI 

Apprehension for the future and many perplexities had 
filled my mind as I moved about among the cheering crowds 
of Londoners in their hour of well-won rejoicing after all 
they had gone through. ... I could not rid my mind of the 
fear that the victorious armies of democracy would soon 
disperse, and that the real and hardest test still lay before us. 
I had seen it all before. I remembered that other joy-day 
nearly thirty years before, when I had driven with my wife 
from the Ministry of Munitions through similar multitudes 
convulsed with enthusiasm to Downing Street to congratulate 
the Prime Minister. 

Then, as at this time, I understood the world situation as 
a whole. But then at least there was no mighty army that we 
need fear. 

Triumph and Tragedy, "The 
Second World War," Vol. VI 



60 A CHURCHILL READER 

This struck a knell in my breast. But I had no choice but 
to submit. 

Triumph and Tragedy, "The 
Second World War; Vol. VI 

[President Truman s order that the American forces should 
withdraw to the agreed lines of occupation on June 21, 1945. 
Sir Winston had made vigorous pleas for this to be done only 
after a meeting of the Big Three to settle the important Euro 
pean problems which loomed large with the ending of the 
war.] 

All the while I felt that much we had fought for in our 
long struggle in Europe was slipping away and that the hopes 
of an early and lasting peace were receding. The days were 
passed amid the clamour of multitudes, and when at night, 
tired out, I got back to my headquarters train ... I had to 
toil for many hours. The incongruity of party excitement 
and clatter with the sombre background which filled my 
mind was in itself an affront to reality and proportion. 

Triumph and Tragedy, "The 
Second World War; r VoL VI 

I was myself deeply distressed at the prospect of sinking 
from a national to a party leader. Naturally I hoped that 
power would be accorded to me to try to make the settle 
ment in Europe, to end the Japanese war, and to bring the 
soldiers home. This was not because it seemed less pleasant 
to live a private life than to conduct great affairs. ... I had 
the world position as a whole in my mind, and I deemed 
myself to possess knowledge, influence, and even authority, 
which might be of service. I therefore saw it as my duty to 
try, and at the same time as my right. I could not believe 
this would be denied me. 

Triumph and Tragedy, "The 
Second World War," VoL VI 



ON HIMSELF 61 

[On preparation for the General Election, 1945.] 

It fell to me in those days to express the sentiments and 
resolves of the British nation in that supreme crisis of its life. 
That was to me an honour far beyond any dreams or ambi 
tions I had ever nursed; and it is one that cannot be taken 
away. 

Verdict on his war Premiership 

I regret that I have not been permitted to finish the work 
against Japan. 

From the message after the 
General Election of 1945 

It would be easy for me to retire gracefully in an odour of 
civic freedom. 

Speech to the Conservative 
Conference., 1946 

[After the defeat of the Conservatives in 1945, Sir Winston 
was tempted to retire. He was certainly full of years and 
honours his "civic freedoms" are no fewer than thirty-two. 
But his combative spirit had been aroused by the defeat, 
and he decided to carry on.] 

On the whole, I accepted the view of the party managers, 
and went to bed in the belief that the British people would 
wish me to continue my work. 

Triumph and Tragedy, "The 
Second World War," Vol. VI 

Just before dawn, I awoke suddenly with a sharp stab of 
almost physical pain. A hitherto subconscious conviction 
that we were beaten broke forth and dominated my mind. 

Triumph and Tragedy, "The 
Second World War; 9 Vol. VI 



62 A CHURCHILL READER 

[On the 1945 General Election. The Socialist victory was 
generally unexpected even by the Socialists themselves. It 
is agreed that the result was not a reflection upon Sir Win 
ston but on the inter-war Conservative Governments.] 

The decision of the British people has been recorded in 
the votes counted today. I have therefore laid down the 
charge which was placed upon me in darker times. ... It 
only remains for me to express to the British people, for 
whom I have acted in these perilous years, my profound 
gratitude for the unflinching, unswerving support which 
they have given me during my task, and for the many ex 
pressions of kindness which they have shown towards their 
servant. 

Triumph and Tragedy, "The 
Second World War; 9 Vol. VI 

As to being booed this was an experience which in ... 
fifty years of the House of Commons I had never previously 
endured, and indeed it was an exhibition which I had never 
witnessed employed against anyone in all the Parliamentary 
storms through which I have lived. 

Speech in the House, Febru 
ary 7, 1951 

I have today to deal with a Motion of censure and therefore 
I hope I shall be pardoned if I do not confine myself entirely 
to the uncontroversial methods which I usually practise. 

Speech in the House, Decem 
ber 4, 1952 

I have not for quite a long time imported any cigars from 
hard currency areas. I have nevertheless received some from 
time to time. 

Speech in the House, Novem 
ber 19, 1951 



ON HIMSELF 63 

[Sir Winston was answering questions about the importation 
of cigars from hard currency areas.] 

You remember Fulton. I got into great trouble being a bit 
in front of the weather that time. But it s all come out since 
I won t say right, but it s all come out. 

Press Conference on board the 
"Queen Mary/ January 
1953 

[The speech at Fulton in America was that in which Sir 
Winston first stated in public his apprehensions of the post 
war Soviet attitude. His warnings were jeered at by his 
opponents, but swiftly proved justified.] 

Mr. James Glanville: "The electors did not accept the 
Right Hon. Gentleman s advice." 

Mr. Churchill: "I am afraid that that is a shaft too deadly 
for me to reply to." 

Speech in the House, March 8, 
1948 

[Speaking on the Navy Estimates, Sir Winston said that if 
the Government had done what he advised in 1945 there 
would have been a stronger Navy.] 

I can only hope that the raw material is as good as the 
method of distribution. 

New York, January 5, 1953 

[Sir Winston was commenting at a Press Conference on the 
marvels of television and the fact that every expression on 
his face could be seen on screens in millions of homes.] 



64 A CHURCHILL READER 

If I stay on for the time being, bearing the burden at my 
age [78], it is not because of love for power or office. I have 
had an ample feast of both. If I stay it is because I have the 
feeling that I may, through things that have happened, have 
an influence on what I care about above all else the build 
ing of a sure and lasting peace. 

Margate, October 10, 1953 

[Sir Winston was answering the speculation on whether he 
would retire, especially after his illness which necessitated a 
month s complete rest.] 

If I remain in public life at this juncture it is because, 
rightly or wrongly, but sincerely, I believe that I may be able 
to make an important contribution to the prevention of a 
third world war, and to bringing nearer the lasting peace 
settlement which the masses of the people of every race and 
in every land fervently desire. I pray indeed that I may have 
this opportunity. It is the last prixe I seek to win. 

Plymouth, October 21, 1951 

[Sir Winston was dealing with the Socialist allegation that he 
was a warmonger and possibly with the suggestion that he 
should have retired. He was then a month off his seventy- 
seventh birthday.] 

I will get on the plane and take my pill and I will wake 
up either in Bermuda or in heaven. Unless one of you 
gentlemen has another fate in mind for me. 

Reported in New York "ffcr- 
ald Tribune" October 6, 
1953 



ON HIMSELF 65 

[Sir Winston had announced his determination to fly to 
Bermuda, where he was to meet President Eisenhower and 
the French Premier Laniel. Some members of the Cabinet, 
mindful of his increasing frailty at the age of seventy-eight, 
sought to persuade him to give up this plan and go by sea.] 

I am perhaps the only man who has passed through both 
the two supreme cataclysms of recorded history in high 
executive office. . . . These thirty years of action and advocacy 
comprise and express my life-effort, and I am content to be 
judged upon them. I have adhered to my rule of never criti 
cising any measure of war or policy after the event unless I 
had before expressed publicly or formally my opinion or 
warning about it. 

Preface from The Hinge of 
Fate, "The Second World 
War; 9 Vol. IV 

Not until I am a great deal worse and the Empire a great 
deal better. 

Quoted in the "Sunday 
Times," February 8, 1953 

[When Sir Winston was visiting the United States in Jan 
uary 1953, he was asked how soon would he retire. He made 
this retort.] 

I am ready to meet my Maker. Whether my Maker is pre 
pared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter. 

[On his seventy-fifth anniversary, Sir Winston was asked if he 
had any fear of death. He made the above reply.] 



66 A CHURCHILL READER 

This is the first occasion when I have addressed this as 
sembly here as Prime Minister. The explanation is con 
vincing. When I should have come here as Prime Minister 
the Guildhall was blown up and before it was repaired I 
was blown out. 

Lord Mayor s Banquet, Lon 
don, November 9, 1951 

I notice that the first Englishman to receive the Nobel 
Prize was Rudyard Kipling and that another equally re 
warded was Mr. Bernard Shaw. I certainly cannot attempt 
to compete with either of those. I knew them both quite well 
and my thought was much more in accord with Mr. Rudyard 
Kipling than with Mr. Bernard Shaw. On the other hand, 
Mr. Rudyard Kipling never thought much of me, whereas 
Mr. Bernard Shaw often expressed himself in most flattering 
terms. 

At No. 10 Downing Street, Oc 
tober 15, 1953 

[On receiving notification that he had been awarded the 
Nobel Prize for Literature. Sir Winston was the first states 
man and the seventh Briton to receive the world s highest 
literary award.] 

We shape our dwellings, and afterwards our dwellings 
shape us. 

Speech on rebuilding the 
House, October 28, 1944 

I have no more ambitions, but a last task I still see in front 
of me, which possibly nobody can take from me, is to ease 
world tension, to pave the way for peace and freedom. Power- 



ONHIMSELF 67 

ful political manoeuvres are no longer practicable. One must 

negotiate. 

Report of a conversation by 
Von Tirpitz, son of the fa- 
mous Admiral Von Tirpitz, 
with Sir Winston, given in 
the "Evening News" Decem 
ber 16, 1953 

I am proud, but also I must admit, awestruck at your de 
cision to include me. I do hope you are right. I feel we are 
both running a considerable risk and that I do not deserve 
it. But I shall have no misgivings if you have none. 

Speech on receiving the Nobel 
Prize for literature. The 
speech was read by Lady 
Churchill in Oslo on De 
cember 10, 1953 



On His Dislikes 



The slimness of this chapter shows the narrow limitations of 
Sir Winston s capacity to dislike many individuals or to dis 
like any for very long. There was a very typical incident in 
the debate on November 3, 1953, when Mr. Herbert 
Morrison recalled that Sir Winston had once expressed the 
wish ee never to see him again." To this Sir Winston retorted 
with a beaming smile, "I have got over that." 

ON LORD MACAULAY 

It is beyond our hopes to overtake Lord Macaulay. . . . We 
can only hope that Truth will follow swiftly enough to fasten 
the label "Liar" to his genteel coat-tails. 

(< Marlborough y His Life and 
Times" 

ON THE LATE LORD ESHER 

It is remarkable that Lord Esher should be so much astray. 
, . . We must conclude that an uncontrollable fondness for 
fiction forbade him to forsake it for fact. Such constancy is 
a defect in an historian. 



ON HIS DISLIKES 69 

[Note on Lord Fisher s description of Sir Winston s part in 
the Antwerp operation.] 

ON THE MARGRAVE OF BADEN 

His military epitaph for all time must be that the two 
greatest captains of the age, pre-eminent and renowned in all 
the annals of war, rated, by actions more expressive than 
words, his absence from a decisive battlefield well worth 
fifteen thousand men. 

"Marlborough, His Life and 
Times" 

ON LORD CURZON 

His facility carried him with a bound into prolixity; his 
ceremonious diction wore the aspect of pomposity; his wide 
knowledge was accused of superficiality; his national pre 
eminence was accompanied by airs of superiority. . . . He 
aroused both envy and admiration, but neither much love 
nor much hatred. 

"Great Contemporaries" 

The morning had been golden; the noontide was bronze; 
and the evening lead. But all were solid and each was pol 
ished till it shone after its fashion. 

"Great Contemporaries" 

ON MR. DALTON 

The hon. Gentleman is trying to win distinction by rude 
ness. 

[On Mr. Dalton s reference to the non-publication of an 
appeal for a peaceful settlement of the General Strike by the 
Christian Churches, May 10, 1926.] 

ON THE LATE LORD STRABOLGI 

(THEN LIEUTENANT-COMMANDER KENWORTHY, M.P.) 



70 A CHURCHILL READER 

His doctrine and his policy is to support and palliate every 
form of terrorism so long as it is the terrorism of revolution 
aries against the forces of law and order. 

Speech on the Punjab disturb 
ances, July 8, 1920 

ON RAMSAY MACDONALD 

The Government are defeated by thirty votes and then the 
Prime Minister rises in his place, utterly unabashed, the 
greatest living master of falling without hurting himself, and 
airily assures us that nothing has happened. 

Speech in the House, January 
21, 1921 

\ remember, when I was a child, being taken to the cele 
brated Barnum s Circus, which contained an exhibition of 
freaks and monstrosities, but the exhibit on the programme 
which I most desired to see was the one described as "The 
Boneless Wonder/ My parents judged that that spectacle 
would be too revolting and demoralising for my youthful 
eyes, and I have waited fifty years to see the Boneless Wonder 
sitting on the Treasury Bench, 

Speech in the House, January 
28, 1933 

We know that he has, more than any other man, the gift of 
compressing the largest amount of words into the smallest 
amount of thought. 

Speech in the House, March 
23, 1933 

ON LORD CHARLES BERESFORD 

He can best be described as one of those orators who, before 



ON HIS DISLIKES 71 

they get up, do not know what they are going to say; when 
they are speaking, do not know what they are saying; and, 
when they have sat down, do not know what they have said. 

Speech after his appointment 
to the Admiralty in 1911 

[Lord Charles Beresford was a bitter critic of the new 
broom.] 

ON COUNT BERCHTOLD 

He meant at all costs, by hook or by crook, to declare war 
on Serbia. In the whole world that was the only thing that 
counted with him. That was what Germany had urged. That 
he must have; and that he got. But he got much more, too. 

"The World Crisis" 

ON THE EX-KAISER 

The defence which can be made will not be flattering to 
his self-esteem. . . . "Look at him; he is only a blunderer." 

"Great Contemporaries" 

It is shocking to reflect that upon the word or nod of a 
being so limited there stood obedient and attentive for thirty 
years the forces which, whenever released, could devastate the 
world. It was not "his fault"; it was his fate. 

"Great Contemporaries 9 

ON BERNARD SHAW 

He was one of my earliest antipathies. . . . This bright, 
nimble, fierce, and comprehending being Jack Frost danc 
ing bespangled in the sunshine. 

He is at once an acquisitive Capitalist and a sincere Com- 



72 A CHURCHILL READER 

munist. He makes his characters talk blithely about killing 
men for the sake of an idea; but would take great trouble not 
to hurt a fly. 

"Great Contemporaries 9 

If the truth must be told, our British island has not had 
much help in its troubles from Mr. Bernard Shaw. When 
nations are fighting for life, when the palace in which the 
jester dwells not uncomfortably is itself assailed, and every 
one from prince to groom is fighting on the battlements, the 
jester s jokes echo only through deserted halls, and his witti 
cisms and condemnations, distributed evenly between friend 
and foe, jar the ear of hurrying messengers, of mourning 
women and wounded men. The titter ill accords with the 
tocsin, or the motley with the bandages. 

"Great Contemporaries" 

ON LADY ASTOR 

She enjoys the best of all worlds. . . . She denounces the vice 
of gambling in unmeasured terms, and is closely associated 
with an almost unrivalled racing stable. She accepts Commu 
nist hospitality and flattery, and remains the Conservative 
Member for Plymouth. 

"Great Contemporaries" 

ON TROTSKY 

He sits disconsolate a skin of malice stranded for a time 
on the shores of the Black Sea and now washed up in the Gulf 
of Mexico. 

He possessed in his nature all the qualities requisite for the 
art of civic destruction the organising command of a Car- 
not, the cold detached intelligence of a Machiavelli, the mob 
oratory of a Cleon, the ferocity of a Jack the Ripper, the 
toughness of Titus Gates. 

"Great Contemporaries" 



ON HIS DISLIKES 73 

I must confess that I never liked Trotsky. 

Speech in the House, August 
2, 1944 

ON LENIN 

He alone could have found the way back to the causeway. 
The Russian people were left floundering in the bog. Their 
worst misfortune was his birth, the next worst his death. 

"The World Crisis" 

[Sir Winston had a certain admiration for Lenin s talents, 
and is pointing out that his early death took place at a mo 
ment when he seemed anxious to curb the worst practical 
and theoretical excesses of the Revolution.] 

It was with a sense of awe that they [the Germans] turned 
upon Russia the most grisly of all weapons. They transported 
Lenin in a sealed truck like a plague bacillus from Switzer 
land into Russia. 

"The World Crisis" 

ON PRESIDENT WILSON 

The inscrutable and undecided judge upon whose lips the 
lives of millions hung. 

He did not truly divine the instinct of the American peo 
ple. First and foremost, all through and last, he was a party 
man. The spacious philanthropy which he exhaled upon 
Europe stopped quite sharply at the coasts of his own country. 

"The World Crisis" 

ON LORD NORTHCLIFFE 

... at all time animated by an ardent patriotism and an in 
tense desire to win the war. But he wielded power without 
official responsibility, enjoyed secret knowledge without the 
general view, and disturbed the fortunes of national leaders 
without being willing to bear their burdens. 

"The World Crisis? 



74 A CHURCHILL READER 

ON LORD OXFORD AND ASQUITH 

When Lord Fisher resigned in May and the Opposition 
threatened controversial debate, Asquith did not hesitate to 
break his Cabinet up, demand the resignation of all Ministers, 
and the political lives of half his colleagues, throw Haldane 
to the wolves, leave me to bear the burden of the Dardanelles, 
and sail victoriously on at the head of a Coalition Govern 
ment. Not "all done by kindness 1 ! Not all by rose-water! 
These were the convulsive struggles of a man of action and 
of ambition at death-grips with events. 

The phrase "Wait and see" which he had used in peace, 
not indeed in a dilatory but in a minatory sense, reflected 
with injustice, but with just enough truth to be dangerous, 
upon his name and policy. 

Great Contemporaries 9 

He fashioned with deep thought impeccable verses in com 
plicated metre, and recast in terser form classical inscriptions 
which displeased him. I could not help much in this! 

"Great Contemporaries" 

[Sir Winston and Lord Asquith went together for a holiday 
in the Mediterranean on the Admiralty yacht. The scion of 
Balliol proved to have a mind which "opened and shut 
smoothly and exactly like the breech of a gun/ and Sir 
Winston rather found that the bigger the gun the greater 
the bore.] 

ON SIR WILLIAM ROBERTSON 

The reader may pass lightly over such incidents as that of 
General Robertson, who never himself at any time led even a 
troop in action . . . speaking of the Cabinet as "poltroons." 

"The World Crisis" 



ON HIS DISLIKES 75 

ON THE HOUSE OF LORDS 

. . . this Second Chamber as it is one-sided, hereditary, un- 
purged, unrepresentative, irresponsible, absentee. 

Speech in the House, June 29, 
1907 

I will retort the question of the Leader of the Opposition 
by another question. Has the House of Lords ever been right? 

Speech in the House, June 29, 
1907 

[In later life, Sir Winston s views on the House of Lords 
mellowed see chapter on Politics.] 

ON THE LATE SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT (1931) 

After listening to his [Mr. William Graham s] capacious 
harangue and its immaculate delivery, one would never have 
thought that the speaker was the representative of an admin 
istration which, having reduced this country almost to beg 
gary, had fled from their posts in terror of the consequences 
which were approaching them. 

Speech in the House on the 
Revised Budget Proposals, 
September 15, 1931 

ON THE 1931-35 GOVERNMENT 

We must regard as deeply blameworthy before history the 
conduct not only of the British Na