Skip to main content

Full text of "Determinations of nitrogen in the soils of some of the experimental fields at Rothamsted [microform] : and the bearing of the results on the question of the sources of the nitrogen of our crops"

See other formats


•54.  ^   *,\1 


IMAGE  EVALUATION 
TEST  TARGET  (MT-3) 


^^ 


1.0 

tea  128     ||2.5 

moo 

tii  Ui    199 

I.I 

Hill  1  ft 

1.25 

l|i^ 

1.6 

6" 


vQ 


v] 


/ 


1/  "^^ 


Photographic 

Sdences 
Corporation 


^ 


V 


€^ 


k 


<^ 


fv 


^  ». 


^ 
^ 


^\r  ^  '% 


23  WEST  MAIN  STREET 

WEBSTER,  N.Y.  14580 

(716)872-4503 


CIHM/ICMH 

Microfiche 

Series. 


CiHM/ICMH 
Collection  de 
microfiches. 


Canadiair  Institute  for  Historical  Microreproductions  /  Institut  Canadian  de  microreproductions  historiquas 


1 


Technical  and  Bibliographiic  Notes/Notes  techniques  et  bibiiographiques 


The  Institute  has  attempted  to  obtain  the  best 
original  copy  available  for  filming.  Features  of  this 
copy  which  may  be  bibliographically  unique, 
which  may  alter  any  of  the  images  in  the 
reproduction,  or  which  may  significantly  change 
the  usual  method  of  filming,  are  checked  below. 


□    Coloured  covers/ 
Couverture  de  couleur 


I      I   Covers  damaged/ 


D 


D 
D 


D 


D 


D 


Couverture  endommagte 


Covers  restored  and/or  laminated/ 
Couverture  restaur^  et/ou  pelliculie 


I      I    Cover  title  missing/ 


Le  titre  de  couverture  manque 


I      I    Coloured  maps/ 


Cartes  giographiques  en  couleur 


Coloured  ink  (i.e.  other  than  blue  or  black)/ 
Encre  de  couleur  (i.e.  autre  que  bleue  ou  noire) 


Coloured  plates  and/or  illustrations/ 
Planches  et/ou  illustrations  e.i  couleur 


..    Bound  with  other  material/ 
^'    ReliA  r'vec  d'autres  documents 


Tight  binding  may  cause  shadows  or  distortion 
along  interior  margin/ 

La  re  liure  serrie  peut  causer  de  I'ombre  ou  de  la 
distortion  le  long  de  la  marge  intirieure 

Blank  leaves  added  during  restoration  may 
appear  within  the  text.  Whenever  possible,  these 
have  been  omitted  from  filming/ 
II  se  peut  que  certaines  pages  blanches  ajouttes 
lors  d'une  restauration  apparaissent  dans  le  texte, 
mais,  lorsque  ceia  Atait  possible,  ces  pages  n'ont 
pas  iti  filmies. 

Additional  comments:/ 
Commentaires  suppi^mentaires: 


L'Institut  a  microfilm^  le  meilleur  exemplaire 
qu'il  lui  a  M  possible  de  se  procurer.  Les  details 
de  cet  exemplaire  qui  sont  peut-Atre  uniques  du 
point  de  vue  bibliographique.  qui  peuvent  modifier 
une  image  reproduite,  ou  qui  peuvent  exiger  une 
modification  dans  la  m6thode  normale  de  filmage 
sont  indiquAs  ci-dessous. 


I      I   Coloured  pages/ 


D 


Pages  de  couleur 

Pages  damaged/ 
Pages  endommagies 

Pages  restored  and/oi 

Pages  restauries  et/ou  pellicul4e& 

Pages  discoloured,  stained  or  foxet 
Pages  ddcolordes,  tachetdes  ou  piqudes 

Pages  detached/ 
Pages  ddtachdes 

Showthrough/ 
Transparence 

Quality  of  prir 

Qualiti  inigale  de  I'impression 

Includes  supplementary  materit 
Comprend  du  materiel  supplimentaire 

Only  edition  available/ 
Seule  Edition  disponible 


I     I  Pages  damaged/ 

I      I  Pages  restored  and/or  laminated/ 

r^  Pages  discoloured,  stained  or  foxed/ 

I      I  Pages  detached/ 

r^  Showthrough/ 

I      I  Quality  of  print  varies/ 

r~1  Includes  supplementary  material/ 

I     I  Only  edition  available/ 


Pages  wholly  or  partially  obscured  by  errata 
slips,  tissues,  etc.,  have  been  refilmed  to 
ensure  the  best  possible  image/ 
Les  pages  totalement  ou  partieilement 
obscurcies  par  un  feuillet  d'errata.  une  pelure, 
etc.,  ont  4t^  filmdes  d  nouveau  de  fapon  d 
obtenir  la  meilleure  image  possible. 


4 


This  item  is  filmed  at  the  reduction  ratio  checked  below/ 

Ce  document  est  filmi  au  taux  de  reduction  indiquA  ci-dessous. 


10X 

14X 

18X 

22X 

26X 

30X 

y 

12X 


16X 


20X 


24X 


28X 


32X 


Th«  copy  filmdd  h«r«  Hm  b««n  raprodue«cl  thanks 
to  tho  gonorosity  of: 

McLennan  Library 
McGill  University 
iMontreal 

Tho  ImagM  appoaring  hara  ara  tha  bast  quality 
posaibia  considarinf;  tha  condition  and  lagibility 
of  tha  original  copy  and  in  kaaping  with  tha 
filming  contract  spaciflcationa. 


Original  copiaa  in  printad  papar  eovars  ara  filmad 
baginning  with  tha  front  cevw  and  anding  on 
tha  laat  paga  with  a  printad  or  illustratad  impras- 
tion.  or  tht  back  covar  whan  appropriata.  All 
othar  original  copiaa  ara  filmad  baginning  on  tha 
first  paga  with  a  printad  or  illustratad  impraa- 
sion,  and  anding  on  tha  laat  paga  with  a  printad 
or  illuatratad  impraaaion. 


L'axampinira  film*  f ut  raproduit  grica  i  la 
g4n4rositi  da: 

IMcLennan  Library 
IMcGill  University 
IMontreal 

Laa  imt  :aa  suivantaa  ont  4ti  raproduitaa  avac  la 
plua  grand  soin,  compta  tanu  da  la  condition  at 
da  ]a  nattati  da  I'axampiaira  film*,  at  an 
conformiti  avac  laa  conditions  du  contrat  da 
filmaga. 

Laa  axamplairaa  originaux  dont  la  couvartura  mn 
papiar  aat  imprimia  sont  fiimAs  an  comman9ant 
par  la  pramiar  plat  at  an  tarminant  soit  par  la 
darnlAra  paga  qui  comporta  una  amprainta 
d'lmpraaaion  ou  u'illustration.  soit  par  la  sacond 
plat,  salon  la  caa.  Toua  laa  autraa  axamplairaa 
originaux  sont  filmte  an  commandant  par  la 
pramlAra  paga  qui  comporta  una  amprainta 
dimpraaaion  ou  dliiuatratlon  at  an  tarminant  par 
la  darnlAra  paga  qui  comporta  una  taila 
amprainta. 


Tha  last  racordad  frama  on  aach  microficha 
shall  contain  tha  symbol  —^(moaning  "CON- 
TINUED"), or  tha  symbol  ▼  (moaning  "END"), 
whichavar  appliaa. 


Un  daa  symbolaa  suhrants  apparattra  sur  la 
darniAra  imaga  da  chaqua  microficha,  salon  la 
caa:  la  symbols  — *•  signlfia  "A  SUIVRE".  la 
symbols  ▼  signlfia  "FIN". 


IMapa,  plataa,  charts,  ate.,  may  ba  filmad  at 
diffarant  raduction  ratioa.  Thoaa  too  larga  to  ba 
antiraly  included  in  ona  axpoaura  ara  filmad 
baginning  in  tha  uppar  laft  hand  comar,  iaft  to 
right  and  top  to  bottom,  aa  many  framaa  aa 
raquirad.  Tha  following  diagrama  illustrata  tha 
mathod: 


Laa  cartaa,  planchaa,  tablaaux,  ate,  pauvant  Atra 
filmia  i  daa  taux  da  rMuction  diff Grants. 
Lorsqua  la  document  aat  trop  grand  pour  Atra 
raproduit  an  un  saul  clichA,  il  aat  film*  A  partir 
da  i'angia  supAriaur  gaucha,  da  gaucha  A  droita, 
at  da  haut  an  baa,  an  pranant  la  nombra 
d'imsgaa  nAcaaaaira.  Laa  diagrammas  suivants 
illuatrant  la  mAthoda. 


1  2  3 


1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

T>  "    iqoU'  Liuoi% 


"W 


■.HffW"fl^»*r»w»>«"*** 


DETERMINATIONS  OF  NITROGEN  IN  THE  SOILS 


OF  SOME  OP  THE 


EXPERIMENTAL  FIELDS  AT  ROTHAMSTED, 


AND   THE 


BEARING  OF  THE  RESULTS  ON  THE  QUESTION  OF 
THE  SOURCES  OF  THE  NITROGEN  OF  OUR  CROPS. 


BY 


Sir  JOHN  BENNET  LAWES,  Bart.,  LL.D.,  F.R.S.,  F.C.S., 


AND 


JOSEPH  HENRY  GILBERT,  Ph.D.,  F.R.S.,  F.C.S.,  F.L.S. 


Bead  in  the  Chemical  Section,  at  the  Meeting  of  the  American  Association 
for  the  Advancement  of  Science,  held  at  Montreal,  in  Augrust,  1882. 


{^Reprinted,  with  corrections,  from  an  uncorrected  copy  issued  hy  the  Government 
Department  of  Agriculture,  WashingtonJ] 


LONDON: 
HARRISON  AND  SONS,  ST.  MARTIN'S  LANE, 

JPrinte«  in  ©rbinHrg  ia  fa  pajestg. 

1883. 


555! 


<.t^ 


k' 


^4 

i 


J 


CONTENTS. 


Introduction 

Yield  op  Nitrogen  in  different  Crops 
Yield  of  nitrogen  in  wheat  and  barley 
Yield  of  nitrogen  in  root-crops 
Yield  of  nitrogen  in  leguminous  crops 
Yield  of  nitrogen  by  a  rotation  of  crops 
Yield  of  nitrogen  in  the  mixed  herbage  of  grass  land 
Yield  of  nitrogen  in  MeUlotus  leucantha 

Summary  op  yield  of  Nitrogen  in  Crops.. 

Sources  op  the  Nitrogen  in  Crops  . . 

Combiiied  nitrogen  in  rain,  etc. 

Other  supposed  sources  of  combined  nitrogen 

Do  plants  assimilate  free  nitrogen  ?  . . 
Recapitulation 


page 
5 

7 
9 
9 
11 
13 
14 
16 
17 

17 
18 
21 
22 
29 


The  Nitrogen  op  the  Soil  as  a  source  op  the  Nitrogen  of  Crops  £0 

Nitrogen  in  the  soils  of  the  experimental  wheat  plots        . .  . .  . .  32 

Nitrogen  in  the  soils  of  the  experimental  barley  plots       . .  . .  , .  39 

Nitrogen  in  the  soils  of  the  experimental  root-crop  plots    . .  . .  . .  40 

Is  THE  Soil  a  source  op  the  Nitrogen  op  the  Lbguminos^  ?  . .  41 

Nitrogen  in  the  soils  of  the  experimental  clover  plots        . .  . .  .  42 

The  soils  of  the  MeUlotus  leucantha  and  white  clover  plots  . .  . .  45 

Nitrogen  as  nitric  acid  in  the  Melilotus  and  white  clover  soils     . .  . .  40 

Nitrogen  as  nitric  acid  in  other  soilu  and  subsoils    . .         . .  . .  . .  48 

Nitrogen  in  some  of  the  soils  of  the  experimental  mixed  herbago  ])lo(8  . .  51 

Source  of  the  nitrogen  of  clover  grown  on  rich  garden  soil  . .  55 

Q-ENERAL  Conclusions      ..         .,        ..         ..         ..         -  .  57 


k  2 


-*li..' 


J   ,-ff'  Jff-JiFJg 


!■■ 


DETERMINATIONS  OF  NITROGEN  IN  THE  SOILS  OP 
SOME  OP  THE  EXPERIMENTAL  PIELDS  AT  ROTHAM- 
STBD,  AND  THE  BEARING  OP  THE  RESULTS  ON  THE 
QUESTION  OP  THE  SOURCES  OP  THE  NITROGEN  OP 
OUR  CROPS. 

By  Sir  John  Bennet  Lawes,  Bart.,  LL.D.,  P.R.S.,  P.C.S.,  and  Joseph 
Henry  Gilbert,  Ph.D.,  P.R.S.,  P.C.S.,  P.L.S. 


Introduction. 

It  is  just  about  a  century  since  the  question  of  the  sources  of  the 
nitrogen  of  vegetation  became  a  subject  of  experimental  inquiry,  and 
also  of  conflicting  opinion.  It  is  nearly  half  a  century  since  Bous- 
singault  was  led  by  a  study  of  the  chemistry  of  agricultural  produc- 
tion to  see  the  importance  of  determining  the  sources  of  the  nitrogen 
periodically  available  to  vegetation  over  a  given  area  of  land.  Some- 
what later  the  Rothamsted  experiments,  now  in  their  fortieth  year, 
were  commenced,  and  in  their  progress  many  facts  have  been  elicited 
bearing  upon  the  same  subject.  Still,  almost  from  the  date  of  Bous- 
singault's  first  investigations,  the  question  has  been  one  of  contro- 
versy, and  at  the  present  time  very  conflicting  views  are  entertained 
respecting  it. 

Por  ourselves,  we  have  pointed  out  how  entirely  inadequate  is  the 
amount  of  combined  nitrogen  coming  down  in  the  measureable 
aqueous  deposits  from  the  atmosphere  to  supply  the  nitrogen  of  the 
vegetation  of  a  given  area.  Other  possible  supplies  of  combined 
nitrogen  from  the  atmosphere  have  also  been  considered,  and  pro- 
nounced inadequate.  Again,  the  question  whether  or  not  plants 
assimilate  the  free  or  uncombined  nitrogen  of  the  atmosphere  has 
been  the  subject  of  laborious  experimental  inquiry,  and  also  of  critical 
discussion,  at  Rothamsted.  Finally,  the  question  whether  the  stores 
of  the  soil  itself  are  an  important  source  of  the  nitrogen  of  our  crops 
has  frequently  been  considered. 

It  may  at  the  outset  be  frankly  admitted  that  so  long  as  the  facts 
of  production  alone  are  studied,  without  knowledge  of,  or  reference 
to,  the  changes  in  the  stock  of  the  nitrogen  in  the  soil,  it  would  seem 
essential  to  assume  that  a  large  proportion  of  the  nitrogen  of  crops 


B 


growing  without  any  direct  supply  of  it  by  manure,  must  be  derived, 
in  some  way  or  other,  from  atmospheric  sources. 

The  assumption  which  is  most  in  favour  with  some  prominent 
writers  is,  that  whilst  some  plants  derive  most  or  all  of  their  nitrogen 
from  the  stores  of  the  soil  itself,  or  from  manure  applied  to  it,  others 
derive  a  large  proportion  from  the  free  nitrogen  of  the  atmosphere. 
We,  on  the  other  hand,  whilst  freely  admitting  that  the  facts  of 
production  are  not  conclusively  explained  thereby,  have  maintained 
that  such  collateral  evidence  as  the  determinations  of  nitrogen  in  our 
soils  afford,  is  in  favour  of  the  supposition  that  the  soil  may  be  the 
source  of  the  otherwise  unexplained  supply  of  nitrogen.  This  latter 
conclusion  we  have  frequently  stated  in  general  terms  ;  but  we  have 
not  hitherto  published  the  numerical  results  upon  which  it  is  based. 
Fairly  enough,  it  has  been  objected  that  such  an  important  conclusion 
cannot  be  accepted  without  the  numerical  evidence  to  support  it. 
Further,  erroneously  interpreting  our  statements,  calculations  have 
been  made  to  show  that  it  is  quite  beyond  the  reach  of  present 
methods  of  determination  of  nitrogen  in  soils  to  afford  results 
justifying  the  conclusions  we  have  drawn. 

Since  this  subject  of  the  sources  of  the  nitrogen  of  our  crops 
has  been  much  discussed  in  America,  it  has  been  thought  that  it 
would  not  be  inappropriate  tO  answer  the  challenge  by  bringing  for- 
ward some  of  the  numerical  evidence  we  have  accumulated  before 
this  meeting  of  the  American  Association  for  the  Advancement  of 
Science,  and  to  do  this  is  the  object  of  the  present  communication. 

Before  calling  attention  to  the  special  results  in  question,  it  will 
be  necessary,  in  order  to  convey  a  clear  idea  of  the  problem  to  be 
solved,  to  recapitulate  some  of  the  important  facts  which  have  been 
established  as  to  the  amount  of  nitrogen  yielded  over  a  given  area  by 
different  crops. 

In  his  original  inquiries,  Boussingault  estimated  the  amounts  of 
nitrogen  supplied  by  manure,  and  removed  in  the  crops,  in  ordinary 
agricultural  practice.  This  mode  of  estimate  is  also  the  one  generally 
adopted  by  others,  and  we  have  ourselves  not  neglected  it.  But  it  is 
obvious  that  the  results  of  experiments  in  which  different  crops  have 
been  grown  for  very  many  years  in  succession  on  the  same  land,  both 
separately  and  in  an  actual  course  of  rotation,  and  both  without  nitro- 
genous manure  and  with  known  quantities  of  such  manure,  must 
afford  very  important  data  as  to  the  amounts  of  nitrogen  available  to 
vegetation,  from  soil  and  atmosphere,  over  a  given  area.  The 
Biothamsted  field  experiments  are  pre-eminently  adapted  to  provide 
such  data.     Thus,  wheat  has  now  been  grown  for  thirty-nine  years 


in  succession  on  the  same  land ;  barley  for  thirty-one  years ;  wheat  in 
alternation  with  fallow  thirty-one  years  ;  beans  for  nearly  thirty 
years  ;  clover  for  many  years ;  turnips,  sugar-beet,  or  mangels,  nearly 
forty  years ;  whilst  experiments  on  the  mixed  herbage  of  grass  land 
have  been  continued  for  twenty-seven  years,  and  on  an  actual  course 
of  rotation  for  thirty-five  years.  "We  have,  from  time  to  time,  pub- 
lished what  we  may  call  the  nitrogen  statistics  of  the  crops  so  grown ; 
and  we  have  compared  these  facts  of  production  with  what  is  known 
of  the  sources  of  nitrogen  available  to  the  crops. 

Yield  op  Nitrogen  in  Different  Crops. 

The  following  table  (I)  shows  the  yield  of  nitrogen  per  acre  per 
annum,  in  wheat,  barley,  root-crops,  beans,  clover,  and  in  ordinary 
rotation,  in  each  case  without  any  nitrogenous  manure.  It  will  be 
observed  that  only  in  the  case  of  the  root-crops  is  the  record  brought 
down  to  a  later  date  than  1875.  Independently  of  the  fact  that  the 
requisite  nitrogen  determinations  are  not  yet  completed  for  the  subse- 
quent period,  it  has  been  decided  that,  owing  to  the  number  of  very 
exceptionally  unfavourable  seasons  for  corn  crops  which  have  occurred 
since  1875,  it  would  be  fallacious  to  bring  the  result''  for  those  crops 
in  the  later  seasons  as  illustrating  the  falling  off  of  yield  due  to  soil 
exhaustion. 


n-- 


8 


Table  I. 

Yield  of  Nitrogen  per  acre  per  anyiuin  in  various  Crops  grown  at  Bothani- 
sted,  without  Nitrogenoiis  Manure. 


Crups,  &c. 


Wheat.. 


Barley ....  - 


L 


Boot-crops  •< 


Beans  . . 


L 


Clover 


••••{ 


Barley ....  "I 
Clover . . . .  / 


Barley. 


Botation . .  < 
7  courses.  ■ 


Condition  of  Manuring,  &c, 


Unmanured 


r 

I 


Complex  mineral  manure. 


Unmanured 


Complex  mineral  manure. 


Complex  mineral 


Duration  of  Experi- 
ment. 


8  years,  1844-51 
12  years,  1852 -'63 
12  years,  1864-75 
24  years,  1852-75 
32  years,  1844-75 

12  years,  1852-'63 
12  years,  1864-75 
24  years,  1852-75 

12  years,  1852-'63 
12  years,  1864-75 
24  years,  1852-75 

12  years,  1852-'63 
12  years,  1864-75 
24  years,  1852-75 


'Turnips 8  years,  1845-'52 

(Barley) 3  years,  1853-'55 

Turnips 15  years,  1856-70* 

manure "j  Sugar  beet  ...  5  years,  1871-75 

I  Mangels 5  years,  1876-'80 

(.Total 36  years,  1845-'80 


Unmanured 


Complex  mineral  manure , 


Unmanured 

Complex  mineral  manui'e , 


Unmanured  . 

Unmanured  . 

Barley  after 
after  barley . 


{ 


f  After  barley . . 
'"  \  After  clover  . . 
clover  more  than 


} 


1.  Turnips ' 

2.  Barley    

3.  Clover  or  beans 

4.  Wheat 


Unmanured  . 

Superphos-  "I 

phate   ..  J 


12  years,  1847-'58 
12  years,  1859-70t 
24  years,  1847-70 

12  years,  1847 -'58 
12  years,  1859-'70t 
24  years,  1847-'70 

22  years,  1849-'70t 
22  years,  1849-'7o| 

1  year,  1873 
1  year,  1873 

1  year,  1874 
1  year,  1874 


28  years,  1848-75 
28  years,  1847-75 


Average 

Nitrogen  per 

Acre  per 

annum. 


lbs. 
25-2 
22-6 
159 
19 
20' 


•3 

•7 


27 
17 
22 


22-0 
14-6 
18-3 

26-0 
18-8 
22-4 

42-0 
(24-3) 
18-5 
13  1 
15-5 
25-2 

48-1 
14-6 
31-3 

61-5 
29  5 
45-5 

30-5 
39-8 

37  3 
151-3 

39-1 
69-4 

30-3 


36-8 
45-2 


*  Thirteen  years'  crop,  two  years  failed. 

t  Nine  years'  beans,  one  year  wheat,  two  years'  fallow. 

X  Six  years'  clover,  one  year  wheat,  three  years'  barley,  twelve  years'  fallow. 


Yield  of  Nitrogen  in  Wheat  and  Barley. 

The  first  series  of  results  relates  to  the  yield  of  nitrogen  in  wheat 
grown  thirty-two  years  in  succession  on  the  same  land  without 
manure.  It  is  seen  that,  over  the  first  eight  years,  the  yield  was 
25*2  pounds  of  nitrogen  per  acre  per  annum,  over  the  next  twelve 
years  22'6  pounds,  and  over  the  last  twelve  of  the  thirty-two  years 
only  15-9.  There  has  thus  been  a  considerable  reduction  in  the 
annual  yield  of  nitrogen  over  each  succeeding  period;  and  for  the 
third  period  of  twelve  years  the  average  is  less  than  two-thirds  as 
much  as  for  the  first  period  of  eigh  u  years. 

Excluding  the  first  eight  years  of  the  growth  of  wheat,  the 
average  annual  yield  of  nitrogen  over  the  next  twenty-four  years 
was  19'3  pounds  per  acre  per  annum ;  and  the  table  shows  that  over 
the  same  twenty-four  years,  barley  without  man  ire  yielded  18"3 
pounds ;  and  whilst  with  the  wheat  the  decline  in  yield  was  from 
22'6  pounds  over  the  first  twelve  of  the  twenty-four  years  to  15'9 
over  the  second  twelve,  it  was  with  the  barley  from  220  to  14'6 
pounds,  or  almost  in  the  same  proportion 

It  might  be  objected  that  here  the  evidence  is  not  conclusive  that 
the  falling  off  is  due  to  the  gradual  reduction  in  the  amount  of 
nitrogen  annually  available  from  the  soil.  But  the  results  with  the 
two  crops,  where  there  is  a  liberal  supply  of  mineral  constituents 
every  year,  exclude  the  supposition  that  the  decline  is  due  to  the 
exhaustion  of  mineral  constituents.  Thus,  over  the  same  twenty- 
four  years,  with  a  complex  mineral  manure,  such  as  is  very  effective 
in  conjunction  vrith  artificial  supply  of  nitrogen  to  the  soil,  the  yield 
of  nitrogen  in  the  wheat  falls  off  from  270  pounds  per  acre  per 
annum  over  the  first  twelve  years,  to  17'2  pounds  over  the  second 
twelve  yeara ;  and  in  the  barley,  over  the  same  two  periods,  it  declines 
from  26"0  to  18'8  pounds. 

The  similarity  in  the  actual  yield,  and  in  the  rate  of  decline 
of  yield,  of  nitrogen  over  the  same  periods  in  these  two  closely  allied 
crops,  though  growing  in  different  fields,  and  with  somewhat  different 
previous  manurial  history,  is  very  striking.  The  slightly  higher 
yield  in  both  cases  with  than  without  the  mineral  manure  is  doubtless 
due  to  more  complete  utilisation  of  the  previous  accumulations 
within  the  soil,  and  not  to  increased  assimilation  from  atmospheric 
sources. 

Yield  of  Nitrogen  in  Boot-crops. 

We  now  come  to  the  yield  of  nitrogen  by  plants  of  other  natural 
families,  and  the  first  of  such  results  relate  to  the  so-called  "  root- 


10 


crops" — turnips  of  the  natural  order  Cruciferce,  and  sugar-beet,  and 
mangel-wurzel  of  the  order  Chenopodiaceoe.  The  table  records  the 
results  for  thirty-six  years  in  succession,  1845-18S0 ;  but  it  should  be 
stated  that  during  three  of  those  years  barley  was  interposed  without 
any  manure,  in  order,  as  far  as  possible,  to  equalise  the  condition  of 
the  land  before  re-arranging  the  manurir.g;  and  during  two  other 
years  the  turnips  failed,  and  there  was  no  crop.  It  should  be  further 
explained  that,  without  manure  of  any  kind,  root-crops,  after  a  few 
years,  give  scarcely  any  produce  at  all,  and  hence  the  results  selected, 
and  recorded  in  the  table,  are  those  obtained  by  the  use  of  mineral 
manures,  but  without  any  supply  of  nitrogen. 

During  the  first  eight  years  (four  years  Norfolk  whites  and  four 
years  Swedes),  the  turnips  gave  an  average  of  42  pounds  of  nitrogen 
per  acre  per  annum,  or  very  much  moi'e  than  either  of  the  cereal 
crops.  During  the  next  three  years  barley  (without  manure)  yielded 
243  pounds,  or  even  somewhat  less  than  the  yield  in  wheat  or  barley 
with  mineral  manures  in  the  earlier  years  of  their  continuous  growth. 
During  the  next  fifteen  years  (thirteen  with  Swedish  turnips  and  two 
without  any  crop),  the  yield  was  reduced  to  18*5  pounds ;  during  the 
next  five  years,  with  sugar-beet,  to  13"1  pounds  ;  and  during  the  last 
five  years,  to  1880  inclusive  (with  mangel-wurzel),  to  15'4  pounds. 
Lastly,  over  the  whole  thirty-six  years,  the  average  annual  yield  of 
nitrogen  was  25"2  pounds. 

Here,  then,  compared  with  wheat  or  barley,  we  have  with  the 
root-crops,  the  growth  of  which  extends  much  further  into  the 
autumn  months,  a  much  higher  annual  yield  of  nitrogen  in  the  earlier 
y?ars,  and  with  this  a  much  more  rapid  rate  of  decline  subsequently, 
the  annual  yield  over  the  last  ten  years  being  only  about  one-third  as 
much  as  over  the  first  eight  years ;  whilst  the  yield  in  the  later  years 
is  actually  less  than  in  either  wheat  or  barley  with  the  same  complex 
mineral  manure.  Here,  again,  the  marked  decline  in  the  yield  of 
nitrogen,  with  liberal  mineral  manuring,  points  to  a  deficiency  in  the 
available  supply  of  nitrogen  itself  as  the  cause  of  the  deficient  assimi- 
lation of  it  by  the  crop. 

It  may  here  be  observed,  that  those  who  maintain  that  the  atmo- 
sphere is  an  important  source  of  the  nitrogen  of  our  crops  assume 
that  the  root-crops,  if  provided  with  a  small  quantity  of  nitro^Tenous 
manure  to  favour  the  early  development  of  the  plant,  will  obtain  the 
remainder  from  the  atmosphere.  How  far  this  is  the  case  may  be 
illustrated  by  the  following  results,  which  are  the  average  of  five 
years'  successive  growth  of  mangel-wurzel  on  the  same  plots,  and  in 
each  case  with  the  same  manure  year  after  year. 


d 

le 


11 


Table  II. 
Averacje  produce  oj  Mangel-wurzel  Jive  years,  1876 — 1880. 


1.  Superphosphate  of  lime,  and  sulphate  potassium  . 

2.  As  1,  and  36^  lbs.  ammonium  salts  (=  7"8  lbs.  N) 

3.  As  1,  and  400  lbs.  ammonium  salts  (=86  lbs.  N) 


Boots. 

Tons. 

Cwt. 

4 

10 

6 

0 

14 

0 

Leaves. 


Tons.  Cwt. 

1  0 

1  6 

2  16 


Thus,  the  annual  application  of  about  7"  8  pounds  of  nitrogen,  as 
ammonium  salts,  has  increased  the  crop  of  roots  by  only  30  cwts.  per 
acre  per  annum  ;  and  the  increased  yield  of  nitrogen  in  the  crop  was 
even  somewhat  less  than  the  amount  supplied  in  the  manure.  An 
application  of  86  pounds  of  nitrogen  has,  however,  increased  the  crop  by 
160  cwts.  more.  It  is  obvious  from  these  facts,  that  the  small  application 
of  nitrogen  did  not  enable  the  plant  to  take  up  any  from  atmospheric 
sources,  and  that  it  required  further  direct  supply  of  nitrogen  to 
obtain  further  increase  of  crop.  These  results  obviously  aiford  con- 
firmation of  the  view  that  it  was  a  reduction  of  the  available  supply 
of  nitrogen  within  the  soil  that  was  the  cause  of  the  decline  in  the 
annual  yield  of  the  crop,  and  of  the  amount  of  nitrogen  contained 
in  it. 


JiJ 


^ 


Yield  of  Nitrogen  in  Leguminous  Crops. 

We  next  come  to  the  consideration  of  the  yield  of  nitrogen  in 
crops  of  the  leguminous  family,  when  these  are  grown  separately, 
year  after  year,  on  the  same  land.  Plants  of  this  family  are  said  to 
rely  almost  exclusively  on  atmospheric  sources  for  their  nitrogen. 

Table  I  shews  that,  without  manure,  beans  gave  over  the  first 
twelve  years  an  annual  yield  of  48-1  pounds  of  nitrogen,  but  over  the 
second  twelve  only  14-6  pounds.  Over  the  first  period,  therefore,  the 
yield  was  about  twice  as  much  as  in  either  wheat  or  barley,  and  more 
even  than  with  the  roots.  But  with  this  greater  yield  in  the  earlier 
years,  the  reduction  is  proportionally  much  greater  over  the  second 
period ;  the  yield  then  coming  down  to  less  than  one-third,  and  to 
much  the  same  as  in  the  later  periods  with  the  other  crops.  Over 
the  whole  period  of  twenty-four  years,  however,  there  was  an  annual 
yield  of  31-8  pounds  of  nitrogen,  or  more  than  one  and  a  half  time  as 
much  as  in  either  wheat  or  barley,  and  more  than  in  the  roots. 

It  was  seen  that  in  the  case  of  the  cereal  crops  the  mixed  mineral 


I 


12 


manure  increased  tlie  yield  of  nitrogen  but  little.  Not  so  in  tLo  case 
of  the  leguminous  crop,  beans.  During  the  first  twelve  years,  the 
complex  mineral  manure  (containing  a  large  amount  of  potash) 
yielded  61'5  pounds  of  nitrogen  per  acre  per  annum,  against  48'1 
pounds  without  manure.  During  the  next  twelve  years,  the  mineral 
manure  gave  29"5  pounds,  against  only  146  pounds  without  manure. 
Daring  the  whole  period  of  twenty-four  years,  the  potash  manure 
yielded  45 "5  pounds  of  nitrogen  per  acre  per  annum,  against 
31"3  pounds  without  manure.  Lastly,  with  the  mixed  mineral  manure 
beaui.  have  yielded  over  a  period  of  twenty-four  years  more  than 
twice  as  much  nitrogen  per  ncre  as  either  whaat  or  barley. 

But  notwithstanding  that  the  beans  have  for  a  long  series  of  years 
yielded  so  very  much  more  nitrogen  over  a  given  area  than  either  of 
the  gramineous  crops,  and  much  more  also  than  the  root-crops,  the 
significant  fact  cannot  fail  to  be  observed  that  this  crop  of  the  legu- 
minous family,  which  is  supposed  to  rely  almost  exclusively  on  the 
atmosphere  for  its  nitrogen,  has  declined  in  yield  as  strikingly  as  the 
other  crops,  even  when  grown  by  a  complex  mineral  manure,  con- 
taining a  large  amount  of  potash.  Why  should  this  be  so  if  the 
supply  of  nitrogen  is  from  the  atmosphere  and  not  from  the  soil  ? 

The  results  next  recorded  relate  to  red  clover,  and  the  period  of 
experiment  was  twenty-two  years.  It  is  well  known  that  on  most 
soils  a  good  crop  of  clover  cannot  be  relied  upon  oftener  than  once  in 
about  eight  years,  and  on  mauy  soils  not  so  frequently.  It  will  not 
excite  surprise,  therefore,  that  in  the  course  of  the  twenty-two  years 
of  experiment,  in  only  six  was  any  crop  of  clover  obtained,  and  in 
some  of  those  only  poor  ones.  Indeed,  the  plant  failed  nine  times  out 
of  ten  during  the  winter  and  spring  succeeding  the  sowing  of  the 
seed.  In  one  year  a  crop  of  wheat,  and  in  three  years  barley,  was 
taken  instead ;  whilst  in  the  remaining  twelve  years  the  land  was  left 
fallow  after  the  failure  of  the  clover.  Still  the  annual  yield  of 
nitrogen  over  the  twenty-two  years  was  30'5  pounds  without  any 
manure,  and  39"8  pounds  by  a  complex  mineral  manure  containing 
potash.  Unfavourable  as  is  this  result  in  an  aj^ricultural  point  of 
view,  it  is  still  seen  that  the  interpolation  of  this  leguminous  crop  has 
greatly  increased  the  yield  of  nitrogen  compared  with  that  in  either 
wheat  or  barley  grown  continuously ;  and  here  again,  as  with  beans,  a 
potash  manure  has  considerable  increased  the  yield. 

The  next  experiment  afforus  a  still  more  striking  illustration  of  the 
large  amount  of  nitrogen  that  may  be  taken  up  in  a  clover  crop  ;  and 
it  further  illustrates  the  fact,  well  known  in  agriculture,  that  the 
removal  of  this  highly  nitrogenous  leguminous  crop  is  one  of  the  best 


13 

possible  preparations  for  the  growth  of  a  cereal  crop,  which  charac- 
teristically requires  nitrogenous  manuring.  A  field  which  had  grown 
six  corn  crops  in  succession,  by  artificial  manures  alone,  was  then 
divided,  and  (in  1873)  on  one  half  barley,  and  on  the  other  half 
clover,  vras  grown.  The  barley  yielded  37-3  pounds  of  nitrogen  per 
acre;  but  the  three  cuttings  of  clover  yielded  151-3  pounds.  In  the 
next  year  (1874)  barley  was  grown  on  both  portions  of  the  field. 
Where  barley  had  previously  been  grown,  and  had  yielded  37-3  pounds 
of  nitrogen  per  acre,  it  now  yielded  391  pounds;  but  where  the 
clover  had  previously  been  grown,  and  had  yielded  151-3  pounds  of 
nitrogen,  the  barley  succeeding  it  gave  69-4  pounds,  or  80-3  pounds 
more  nitrogen  after  the  removal  "  151-3  pounds  in  clover  than  after 
the  removal  of  only  37-3  pounds  in  barley.  It  will  be  seen  further  on 
that  this  result  was  not  in  any  way  accidental. 


Yield  of  Nitrogen  hy  a  Rotation  of  Crops. 

The  last  results  recorded  in  the  table  relate  to  the  yield  of  nitrogen 
in  an  ordinary  four-course  rotation  of — turnips,  barley,  clover  or 
beans,  and  wheat.  The  average  yield  per  annum  is  given  for  seven 
courses,  or  for  a  period  of  twenty-eight  years  ;  in  one  case  without  any 
manure  during  the  whole  of  that  time,  and  in  the  other  with  super- 
phosphate of  lime  alone,  applied  once  every  four  years,  that  is,  for  the 
turnips  commencing  each  course. 

Here,  with  a  turnip  crop,  and  a  leguminous  crop,  interpolated  with 
two  cereal  crops,  we  have,  without  manure  of  any  kind,  an  average  of 
36-8  pounds  of  nitrogen  per  acre  per  annum,  or  very  much  more  than 
was  obtained  in  either  of  the  cereal  crops  grown  consecutively.  With 
superphosphate  of  lime  alone,  which  much  increased  the  yield  of 
nitrogen  in  the  turnips,  reduced  it  in  the  succeeding  barley,  increased 
it  greatly  in  the  leguminous  crops,  and  slightly  in  the  wheat  suc- 
ceeding them,  the  average  annual  yield  of  nitrogen  is  increased  to 
45-2  pounds,  or  to  about  double  that  obtained  in  either  wheat  or 
barley  grown  consecutively  by  a  complete  mineral  manure.  On  this 
point  it  may  be  further  remarked  that  in  adjoining  experiments,  in 
which,  instead  of  a  leguminous  crop,  the  land  was  fallowed  in  the 
third  year  of  each  course,  the  total  yield  of  nitrogen  in  the  rotation 
was  very  much  less.  In  other  words,  the  removal  of  the  most  highly 
nitrogenous  crops  of  the  rotation — clover  or  beans — was  succeeded  by 
a  growth  of  wheat,  and  an  assimilation  of  nitrogen  by  it,  almost  as 
great  as  when  it  succeeded  a  year  of  fallow  ;  that  is,  a  period  of  some 
accumulation  by  rain,  &c.,  and  of  no  removal  by  crops. 


14 


Yield  of  Nitrogen  in  the  Mixed  Herbage  of  Grass  Land. 

Another  illustration  of  the  amounts  of  nitrogen  removed  from  a 
given  area  of  land  by  different  descriptions  of  crop  will  be  found  in 
Table  III,  which  shows  the  results  obtained  when  plants  of  the 
gramineous,  the  leguminous,  and  other  families,  are  grown  together, 
in  the  mixed  herbage  of  grass  land. 

Table  III. 

Yield  of  Nitrogen  on  the  Mixed  Herbage  of  Permanent  Grass  Land 

at  Rothamsted. 


Conditions 

of 
Manuring. 

Average  Produce  per  acre 
per     annum,     20    years, 
1856-1875,   according   to 
mean    per    cent.,   at    six 

Average  Nitrogen 

per  Acre 

per  annum. 

Plots. 

periods,    1862,    '67,   '71, 
'72,  '74,  '75. 

Ten 
years 
1856- 
1865. 

Ten 
years 
1866- 
1875. 

Twenty 

Grami- 
netB. 

Legumi- 
nosse. 

Other 
Orders. 

years 
1856- 
1875. 

3 
4-1 

8 
7 

Unmanured 

Superphosphate*. .  . . 
Comp  ex  Min.  Man.f 
Complex  Min.  Man.  J 

lbs. 
1635 
1671 
2442 
2579 

lbs. 
219 
149 
296 

806 

lbs. 
529 
673 
639 
573 

lbs. 
35  1 
35-7 
54-4 
55-2 

lbs. 
30-9 
31-5 
38-1 
56  0 

lbs. 
33-0 
33-6 
46  3 
55-6 

Before  referring  to  the  figures,  attention  should  be  called  to  the 
fact  that  gramineous  crops  grown  separately  on  arable  land,  such  as 
wheat,  barley,  or  oats,  contain  a  comparatively  low  percentage  of 
nitrogen,  and  assimilate  a  comparatively  small  amount  of  it  over  a 
given  area.  Yet  nitrogenous  manures  have  generally  a  very  striking 
effect  in  increasing  the  growth  of  such  crops.  The  highly  nitro- 
genous leguminous  crops,  on  the  other  hand,  such  as  beans  and 
clover,  yield,  as  has  been  seen,  very  much  more  nitrogen  over  a 
given  area :  yet  they  are  by  no  means  characteristically  benefited  by 
nitrogenous  manuring,  but  their  growth  is  considerably  increased, 
and  they  yield  considerably  more  nitrogen  over  a  given  area,  under 
the  influence  of  purely  mineral  manures,  and   especially  of  potash 


*  Mean  of  four  separations  only,  namely,  1862,  1867,  1872,  and  1875. 

t  Including  potash,  six  years,   1856-1861 ;  without  potash,   14  years,   1802- 


1875. 


X  Including  potash,  20  years,  1856-1875. 


^./> 


15 


manures.     Bearing  these  facts  in  mind,  the  results  given  in  the  table 
will  be  seen  to  be  quite  consistent. 

The  first  three  columns  in  the  table  show,  approximately,  how 
the  mixed  herbage  was  made  up  under  the  four  different  conditions 
of  manuring.  It  will  be  observed  that,  without  manure,  and  with 
superphosphate  of  lime  alone,  both  the  proportion  and  the  amount  of 
the  different  descriptions  of  herbage  are  much  the  same.  Plot  8, 
with  a  complex  mineral  manure,  including  potash  the  first  six  years, 
but  excluding  it  the  next  fourteen  years,  gave  a  considerable  increase 
of  both  gramineous  and  leguminous  herbage ;  whilst  plot  7,  with  a 
complex  mineral  manure,  including  potash  every  year  of  the  twenty, 
there  is  a  still  further  increase  of  gramineous  herbage,  but  a  very 
much  greater  proportional  increase  of  leguminous  herbage. 

It  will  be  observed  how  much  greater  is  the  increase  of  gramineous 
produce  by  the  application  of  purely  mineral  manures  to  this  mixed 
herbage  than  in  tie  case  of  gramineous  crops  grown  separately.  It 
is  a  question  how  far  this  is  due  to  the  mineral  manures  enabling 
the  grasses  to  form  much  more  stem  and  seed,  that  is,  the  better 
to  mature,  which  in  fact  they  do ;  how  far  to  their  favouring  more 
active  nitrification  in  the  more  highly  nitrogenous  permanent  mixed 
herbage  soil ;  or  how  far  to  an  increased  amount  of  combined  nitrogen 
in  a  condition  available  for  the  grasses  in  the  upper  layers  of  the 
soil,  as  the  result  of  the  increased  growth  of  the  Leguminos89  in  the 
first  instance,  induced  by  the  potash  manure,  as  in  the  case  of  the 
alternation  of  clover  and  barley,  and  as  in  the  actual  course  of 
rotation  ? 

To  turn  to  the  yield  of  nitrogen  on  the  different  plots  of  the 
mixed  herbage,  it  will  be  seen  that  the  amounts  are  almost  identical 
without  manure,  and  with  superphosphate  of  lime  alone,  about 
33  pounds  per  acre  per  annum.  On  plot  8,  where  a  co/nplex  mineral 
manure,  including  potash  six  years,  but  excluding  potash  fourteen 
years,  was  employed,  the  amount  is  raised  to  46*3  pounds ;  and  on 
plot  7,  which  received  the  mixed  mineral  manure,  including  potash 
every  year  of  the  twenty,  the  yield  is  55'6  pounds  per  acre  per  annum. 
Further,  without  manure,  and  with  superphosphate  of  lime  alone, 
there  was  a  decline  in  the  yield  of  nitrogen  in  the  later,  compared 
with  the  earlier  years.  With  the  mineral  manure,  including  potash 
in  the  first  six  yea:'S  only,  there  was  a  much  more  marked  decline. 
With  the  miners  nanure,  including  potash  every  year,  there  was, 
on  the  other  hand,  even  a  slight  tendency  to  an  increased  yield  of 
nitrogen  in  the  later  years. 


m 


16 


Yield  of  Nitrogen  in  Melilotus  Lencantha. 

One  more  striking  illustration  of  high  yield  of  nitrogen  by  a 
plant  of  the  leguminous  family,  this  time  on  soil  which  had  not 
received  any  nitrogenous  manure  for  nearly  thirty  years,  must  be 
given.  In  1878,  the  land  upon  which  attempts  had  been  made  to 
grow  red  clover  in  frequent  succession  since  1849,  was  devoted  to 
experiments  with  fourteen  different  descriptions  of  leguminous  plants ; 
so  that  the  present  season,  1882,  is  the  fifth  year  of  the  experiments. 
The  object  was  to  ascertain  whether,  among  a  selection  of  plants,  all  of 
the  leguminous  family,  but  of  different  habits  of  growth,  and  especially 
of  different  character  and  range  of  roots,  some  could  be  grown  success- 
fully for  a  longer  time,  and  would  yield  more  produce,  containing 
more  nitrogen  as  well  as  other  constituents,  than  others;  all  being 
supplied  with  the  same  descriptions  and  quantities  of  manuring  sub- 
stances, applied  to  the  surface  soil.  Further,  whether  the  success  in 
some  cases  and  the  failure  in  others,  would  afford  additional  evidence 
as  to  the  source  of  the  nitrogen  of  the  Leguminosas  generally,  and  as 
to  the  causes  of  the  failure  of  red  clover  in  particular,  when  it  is 
grown  too  frequently  on  the  same  land.  Fourteen  different  descrip- 
tions of  plants  were  jelected,  and,  after  two  or  three  immaterial 
changes,  the  list  at  the  present  time  includes  eight  species  or  varieties 
of  Trifoliurn,  two  of  Medicago,  Melilotus  leucantha,  Lotus  corniculattis, 
Vicia  sativa,  and  Onohrychis  sativa. 

Of  the  numei'ous  species  or  varieties  of  Trifoliwn,  all  gave  but 
meagre  produce,  excepting  T.  incarnatum.  The  Lotus  corniculatus 
also  gave  very  small  produce.  The  two  species  of  Medicago,  the  black 
Medick,  and  the  purple  MedicJc  or  Lucerne,  and  the  OnohrycJiis,  or 
common  Sainfoin,  gave  much  more  ;  the  Vicia  sativa  or  common 
vetch,  more  still.  But  of  all,  the  Melilotus  leucantha,  or  Bokhara 
clover,  has  yielded  the  most.  It  is  estimated  that,  taking  the  average 
of  four  years,  1878-81,  it  yielded  about  70  pounds  of  nitrogen  per 
acre  per  annum,  on  plots  which  have  received  no  nitrogenous  manure 
for  more  than  thirty  years;  whilst  the  produce  of  the  fifth  season, 
1882,  is  heavier  than  in  either  of  the  preceding  years  ;  and  it  is  esti- 
mated to  contain  about  150  pounds  of  nitrogen.  In  fact,  in  the 
second,  as  well  as  in  the  fifth  year,  the  melilotus  yielded  considerably 
more  than  100  pounds  of  nitrogen  per  acre ;  and  on  the  average  of 
the  five  years  it  has  yielded  between  80  and  90  pounds  per  acre  on 
this  nitrogen-exhausted  soil. 

How  long  this  very  luxuriant  growth,-  and  this  very  high  yield  of 
nitrogen  per  acre,  will  continue,  is  a  question  of  very  great  interest. 


F 


f 


^ibi> 


17 


a 

lot 
be 
to 
to 

its; 

iits. 

of 


On  tliis  point  it  may  be  observed  that,  in  parts  of  the  continent  of 
Europe  where  some  of  the  very  free-growing  and  deep-rooted  Legn- 
minosaj  are  cultivated,  it  is  usual  to  let  them  grow  for  several  years, 
after  which  they  cannot  be  repeated  for  twenty  years  or  more.  We 
shall  recur  to  the  result?  above  quoted  further  on. 

Summary  of  Yield  of  Nitrogen  in  Crops. 

The  foregoing  facts  of  production,  showing  the  yield  of  nitrogen 
in  different  crops  grown  without  nitrogenous  manure,  generally  for 
very  many  years  in  succession  on  the  same  land,  may  be  briefly 
summed  up  as  follows  : 

The  average  yield  of  nitrogen  per  acre  per  annum,  was,  with 
wheat,  thirty-two  years  without  manure,  207  pounds,  and  twenty-four 
years  with  a  complex  mineral  manure,  22  "1  pounds ;  with  barley, 
twenty-four  years  without  manure,  18"3  pounds,  and  twenty-four  years 
with  a  complex  mineral  manure,  22"4  pounds  ;  with  root-crops,  thirty- 
six  years  (including  three  of  barley),  with  a  complex  mineral  manure, 
25*2  pounds;  with  beans,  twenty-four  years  without  manure,  31*3 
pounds,  and  twenty-four  years  with  a  complex  mineral  manure,  45'5  ; 
with  clover,  six  crops  in  twenty- two  years,  with  one  crop  of  wheat,  three 
crops  barley,  and  twelve  years  fallow,  without  manure,  30'5  pounds ; 
with  complex  mineral  manure,  39"8  pounds ;  with  clover,  on  land  which 
had  not  grown  the  crop  for  very  many  years,  one  year,  151*3  pounds ; 
with  a  rotation  of  crops,  seven  courses,  twenty-eight  years,  without 
manure,  36'8  pounds,  and  with  superphosphate  of  lime,  45'2  pounds ; 
with  the  mixed  herbage  of  grass  land,  twenty  years  without  manure, 
33  pounds,  and  with  complex  mineral  manure,  including  potash,  55'6  ; 
lastly,  with  Bokhara  clover,  five  years,  with  mineral  manure,  between 
80  and  90  pounds  of  nitrogen  per  acre  per  annum. 

The  root-crops  yielded  more  nitrogen  than  the  cereal  crops,  and 
the  leguminous  crops  very  much  more  still. 

In  all  the  cases  of  the  experiments  on  ordinary  arable  land — 
whether  with  cereal  crops,  root-crops,  leguminous  crops,  or  a  rota- 
tion of  crops  (excepting  as  yet  the  Bokhara  clover) — the  decline  in 
the  annual  yield  of  nitrogen,  none  being  supplied  by  manure,  was  very 
great. 

Sources  of  the  Nitrogen  of  Crops. 

We  must  next  consider  whence  comes  the  nitrogen  of  the  crops, 
and  especially  whence  comes  the  much  larger  amount  taken  up  by 
plants   of  the   leguminous,    and   some   other  families,  than  by   the 

h 


18 

Gramineae.  Lastly,  what  is  the  significance  of  the  great  decline  in  the 
yield  of  nitrogen  in  all  the  crops  grown  on  arable  land  when  none  is 
supplied  in  the  manure  ? 

Combined  Nitrogen  in  Bain,  8fc. 

It  has  been  assumed  by  some  that  the  amount  of  combined  nitrogen 
annually  coming  down  in  the  measured  aqueous  deposits  from  the 
atmosphere  is  sufficient  for  all  the  requirements  of  annual  growth.  In 
Liebig's  earlier  writings  he  assumed  the  probability  of  a  very  much 
larger  quantity  of  ammonia  coming  down  in  rain  than  he  did  subse- 
quently ;  but  even  in  his  more  recent  work,  "  The  Natural  Laws  of 
Husbandry,"  published  in  1863,  he  supposes  that  as  much  as  24 
pounds  of  nitrogen  per  acre  may  be  annually  available  to  vegetation 
from  that  source.  Such  an  amount  would,  it  is  obvious,  do  much 
towards  meeting  the  requirements  of  many  of  the  crops  the  nitrogen 
statistics  of  which  have  been  given. 

The  earliest  considerable  series  of  determinations  of  the  amount  of 
ammonia  coming  down  in  rain  in  the  open  countiy  were  by  Boussin- 
gault,  in  Alsace.  He  gives  the  amount  of  ammonia  per  million  of 
rain-water  in  each  fall  for  a  period  of  between  five  and  six  months, 
May-October,  1852  ;  but  he  does  not  calculate  the  amount  so  coming- 
down  over  a  given  area  of  land.  His  average  amount  per  million 
was,  however,  somewhat  less  than  that  found  at  Rothamsted  in  1853 
and  1854,  and  found  by  Mr.  Way  in  Rothamsted  rain-water  collected 
in  1855  and  1856 ;  which,  calculated  according  to  the  rain-fall  of  the 
periods,  give  the  following  amounts  of  nitrogen  so  coming  down  per 
acre.  The  amounts  of  nitrogen  as  nitric  acid,  as  determined  by 
Mr.  Way,  and  the  amount  of  total  combined  nitrogen  as  ammonia 
and  nitric  acid  together,  are  also  given. 


Table  IV. 

Nitrogen,  as  Ammonia  and  Nitric  Acid,  in  the  Rainfall 
Year's,  at  Rothamsted,  in  Pounds  per  Acre 

of  Three 

Rainfall. 

Nitrogen  per  Acre,  as — 

Years. 

Ammonia. 

Nitric 
Acid. 

Total 
Nitrogen. 

1853-54 

Indies. 
29-014 
29  166 
27-215 

lbs. 
5-20 

E-82 
7-28 

lbs. 
(0-74) 
0-72 
0-76 

lbs. 
5-04 

1855 

6 -.18 

1856 

8*00 

Mean 

28  -465 

6-10 

0-74 

6-84 

^ 


19 


IS 


It  will  be  seen  that,  according  to  these  results,  an  average  of  6'84 
pounds  was  contributed  per  acre  per  annum  in  the  rain  in  the  form 
of  ammonia  and  nitric  acid.  More  recently,  however.  Dr.  Frankland 
has  determined  the  amount  of  ammonia  and  nitric  acid  in  numerous 
samples  of  rain  and  snow  water,  dew,  hoar-frost,  &c.,  collected  at 
Rothamsted  from  April,  18G0,  to  ^lay,  1870,  inclusive  :  and  the  average 
amount  of  ammonia  per  million  of  water  found  by  him  is  considerably 
lower  than  the  earlier  determinations  show.  More  recently  .;till  the 
ammonia  has  been  determined  in  the  Rothamsted  laboratory,  in  the 
rain  of  each  day  separately  (if  any),  for  a  period  of  six  months,  July- 
December,  1881  ;  also  in  the  proportionally  mixed  rain  for  each 
month,  for  a  period  o"  thirteen  months,  June,  1881,  to  June,  1882. 
The  average  proportion  of  ammonia  in  these  most  recent  determina- 
tions accords  with  the  results  of  Dr.  Frankland,  and  points  to  a 
smaller  amount  of  total  combined  nitrogen  supplied  per  acre  in  the 
average  annual  rainfall  at  Rothamsted  than  that  recorded  in  the 
table ;  probably,  indeed,  to  not  more  than  four  or  five  pounds  of  total 
combined  nitrogen  per  acre  per  annum. 

Dr.  R.  Angus  Smith,  in  his  work  entitled  "  Air  and  Rain,  the 
Beginnings  of  a  Chemical  Climatology,"  1872,  gives  the  results  of 
numerous  analyses  of  rain-water  collected  both  in  country  and 
town  districts  in  the  United  Kingdom.  The  amounts  of  ammonia 
and  nitric  acid  in  the  rain  vary  exceedingly,  according  to  1  xlity ; 
b\it  the  amounts  in  the  rain  of  country  places  accord  generally  with 
those  found  in  the  Rothamsted  rainfall. 

The  following  table  summarises  the  results  of  numerous  determi- 
nations made  at  various  stations  on  the  continent  of  Europe,  in  each 
case  extending  over  a  whole  year  : — 


B  2 


20 


Table  V. 

Nitrogen  as  Ammonia  and  Nitric  Acid  in  the  Rain  of  various 

Localities  in  Europe. 

[Quantities  in  Pounds  per  Aero  per  Annum.] 


Localities. 


Euschen 

Kuschen 

Insterburg 

Tnsterburg 

Dahme 

Regenwalde    

Regenwalde    

Regenwalde    

Ida  -  Marienhiitte  ;     mean 

six  years 

Proskaw 

Florence  

riorence  

Florence  

Vallombrosa   

Montsouris,  Paris 

Montsouris,  Paris 

Montsouris,  Paris 

Mean,  22  years 


Years. 


1864-'65 

1865-'66 

1864-'65 

1865-'66 

1865 

1864r-'65 

1865-'66 

1866-'67 

1865-'70 
1864-'65 
1870 
1871 

1872 

1872 

1877-'78 

1878-'79 

1879-80 


Rainfall. 


Inches. 

11  85 

17-70 

27-55 

23-79 

17  09 

23-48 

19-31 

25-37 

22-65 
17-81 
36-55 

42  -48 
50-82 
79-83 
23-62 
25-79 
15-70 


27-03 


Nitrogen  as — 


Nitric 

Ammonia. 

Acid. 

lbs. 

lbs. 

1-44 

0-42 

1-83 

0-67 

3-55 

1-94 

4-14 

2-67 

5-50 

1-16 

10-82 

4-27 

8-27 

2-11 

13-20 

3-24 

13-58 

7-33 

9-71 

3-65 

7-78 

2  11 

9-50 

3  01 

7-65 

2-73 

10-25 

1-29 

7  05 

4-11 

4  83 

5-69 

•• 

•  • 

Total. 


lbs. 


86 
50 
49 

81 


6-66 
15  -09 
10-38 
16-44 

9-92 
20-91 
13-36 

9-89 
12-51 
10-38 


11 
11 


54 
16 


10-52 
10-23 


It  is  seen  that  the  numerous  very  widely  varying  determinations, 
some  made  in  the  vicinity  of  towns  and  some  in  the  open  country,  give 
a  mean  of  10-23  pounds  of  combined  nitrogen  annually  supplied  per 
acre  by  rain  with  a  mean  rainfall  of  27-03  inches.  Making  all  allow- 
ance for  far  inland  open  country  positions  on  the  one  hand,  and  for 
proximity  to  towns  on  the  other,  the  very  small  amounts  of  combined 
nitrogen  so  supplied  per  acre  in  some  of  the  cases,  and  the  compara- 
tively large  quantities  in  others,  seem  difficult  to  explain,  or  to  recon- 
cile, either  with  one  another  or  with  the  results  of  Boussingault  and  of 
Rothamsted.  When,  however,  the  comparatively  limited  and  uniform 
total  amounts  recorded  for  Montsouris,  within  the  walls  of  Paris,  are 
considered,  11*54  pounds,  11-16  pounds,  and  10-52  pounds  per  acre  per 
annum,  it  will  not  excite  surpi-ise  that  we  should  estimate  the  amount 
of  combined  nitrogen  coming  down  in  the  measured  aqueous  deposits 


21 

from  the  atmosphere  at  probably  not  more  than,  if  as  much  as, 
5  pounds  per  aero  per  annum  in  the  open  country  at  Rothamsted. 

With  records  of  the  amounts  of  combined  nitrogen  contributed  to 
a  given  area  in  rain,  we  come  to  an  end  of  all  quantitative  evidence 
as  to  the  amount  of  combined  nitrogen  available  to  the  vegetation  of 
a  given  area  from  atmospheric  sources.  It  will  be  seen  how  entirely 
inadequate  is  the  amount  probably  so  available  to  supply  the  quanti- 
ties yielded  in  different  crops  grown  without  nitrogenous  manure,  as 
recorded  in  Tables  I  and  III  (pp.  8  and  14). 

It  is  true  that  the  minor  aqueous  deposits  from  the  atmosphere  are 
much  richer  in  combined  nitrogen  than  rain,  and  there  can  be  no 
doubt  that  there  would  bo  more  deposited  within  the  pores  of  a  given 
area  of  soil  than  on  an  equal  area  of  the  non-porous  even  surface  of  a 
rain-gauge.  How  much,  however,  of  this  might  be  available  beyond 
that  determined  in  the  collected  aqueous  deposits,  existing  evidence 
does  not  afford  the  means  of  estimating  with  certainty. 


Other  Supposed  Sources  of  Combined  Nitrogen. 

Further,  it  has  been  argued  that,  in  the  last  stages  of  the  decom- 
position of  organic  matter  in  the  soil,  hydrogen  is  evolved,  and  that 
this  nascent  hydrogen  combines  with  the  free  nitrogen  of  the  atmo- 
sphere, and  so  forms  ammonia.  Again,  it  has  been  suggested  that 
ozone  may  be  evolved  in  the  oxidation  of  organic  matter  in  the 
soil,  and  that,  uniting  with  free  nitrogen,  nitric  acid  would  be  pro- 
duced. 

We  have  discussed  these  various  possible  supplies  of  combined 
nitrogen  to  the  soil  from  atmospheric  sources  on  more  than  one  occa- 
sion ;  and  we  have  given  our  reasons  for  concluding  that  none  of  them 
can  be  taken  as  accounting  for  the  facts  of  growth.  Incidentally,  some 
evidence  will  be  given  further  on,  confirming  the  conclusion  that  any 
such  supplies  are  limited  and  inadequate. 

But,  if  the  supplies  from  the  atmosphere  to  the  soil  itself  are 
inadequate,  how  about  the  direct  supplies  from  the  atmosphere  to  the 

plant  ? 

One  view  which  has  been  advocated  is,  that  broad-leaved  plants 
have  the  power  of  taking  up  combined  nitrogen  from  the  atmosphere, 
in  a  manner,  or  in  a  degree,  not  possessed  by  the  narrow-leaved 
gramineous  plants.  The  only  experiments  that  we  are  aware  of,  made 
to  determine  whether  plants  can  take  up  nitrogen  by  their  leaves 
from  ammonia  supplied  to  them  in  the  ambient  atmosphere,  are  those 
of  Adolph  Mayer  in  Germany,  and  of  Schlosing  in  France.     Both 


22 

found  that  very  small  qnantitics  of  nitrogen  wcro  so  taken  up ;  but 
both  concluded  that  the  action  takes  place  in  very  immaterial  degree 
in  natnral  vegetation. 

We  have  elsewhere  shown  that  a  consideration  of  the  chemistry 
and  the  physics  of  the  subject  would  lead  to  the  conclusion  that  the 
plants  which  assimila'^e  more  nitrofjfen  over  a  given  area  than  others 
do  not  do  so  by  virtue  of  a  greater  power  of  absorbing  already  com- 
bined nitrogen  from  the  atmosphere  by  their  leaves.  But,  apart  from 
such  considerations,  our  statistics  of  nitrogen  production  seem  to  pre- 
elude  the  idea  tliat  the  broad-leaved  root-crops,  turnips  and  the  like, 
to  which  the  function  has  with  the  most  confidence  been  attributed, 
take  up  any  material  proportion  of  their  nitrogen  by  their  leaves  from 
combined  nitrogen  in  the  atmosphere.  We  need  only  here  recall  atten- 
tion to  the  fact  that  the  yield  of  nitrogen  in  these  crops,  even  with 
the  aid  of  a  complex  mineral  manure,  was  in  the  later  years  reduced 
to  as  low  a  point  as  in  the  cas^  of  the  narrow-leaved  cereals. 


:i 


Do  Plants  Assimilate  Free  Nitrogen? 

The  question  still  remains  to  consider — whether  plants  assimilate 
the  free  nitrogen  of  the  atmo.sphero,  and  whether  some  descrijitions 
do  so  in  a  much  greatc  '  degi'ee  than  others  ?  It  is  freely  admitted 
that  if  this  were  establisued  many  of  our  difficulties  would  vanish. 

This  question  has  been  the  subject  of  a  great  deal  of  experimental 
inquiry,  since  the  time  that  Boussingault  entered  upon  it  about  the 
year  1837  ;  and  more  than  twenty  years  ago  it  was  elaborately  investi- 
gated at  Rothamsted. 

We  will  here  give  a  snmmary  of  the  very  conflicting  results  which 
have  been  published  in  reference  to  this  subject,  of  the  assimilation  of 
the  free  nitrogen  of  the  atmosphere  by  plants,  contining  attention,  for 
want  of  space,  to  the  three  most  comprehensive  series  of  experiments 
which  have  been  undertaken  relating  to  it. 

Though  not  the  first  in  point  of  date,  we  will  first  refer  to  the 
experiments  of  M.  G.  Ville,  the  results  of  which  led  him  to  conclude 
that  plants  do  assimilate  the  free  nitrogen  of  the  air — a  view  of 
which  he  has  been  the  arch-apostle  for  many  years,  and  upon  which 
ho  may  be  said  to  have  founded  a  system,  in  his  work  on  "  Artificial 
Manures." 

From  1849  to  1856,  M.  G.  Ville  made  numerous  experiments  on 
this  subject.  The  following  table  (VI)  gives  a  summary  of  his  results, 
and  shows  the  special  conditions  of  each  separate  series  of  experi- 
ments:— 


23 


■bat 
free 

itrj 


% 


r 


Table  VI. 

Eestilts  o/M,  G.  Villk's  Expentneiits,  to  determine  whether  Plants 

assimilatii  free  Nitro'jen. 


Plants 


Nitrogen,  grama. 


In  Seed, 
and  Ail' ; 

and 

Manuro, 

if  any. 


Nitrogen 

in 
Products 

tol 
Supplied. 


1849 :  Car  -. 

•■>t  of  unwashed  air  aapphjing  0*001 

gram  N.  as 

Ammonia.* 

Cress 

0 -0260 
0-0610 
0 -0640 

0  1470 
0-0610 
0  0470 

0-1210 

0  -0000 

-  0  -0170 

5-6 

Large  Lupins 
Small  Lupins 

1-0 

0-7 

0  -1550 

0  -2580 

0  -1030 

1-7 

1850:  Current  of  unwashed  air  supplying  0-0017  gram  N.  as  Ammonia. 


Colza  (plants) 
Wheat 

Rye   

Maize    


0 -0260 
0  -0160 
0-0130 

o-02yo 

0  -OS.-)? 


1  -0700 
0-0310 
0  0370 
0-1280 

1-2660 


1  0440 
0 -0150 
0 -0240 

0  -0990 

1  -1803 


41-1 
1-9 
2-8 
4-4 

14-8 


1851 :   Current  of  washed  air.* 

Sunflower 

0  -0050 
0  -00 10 
0  -0040 

0  -1570 
0-1750 
0-1620 

0 -1520 
0-1710 
0 -1580 

31-4 

Tobacco 

43-7 

Tobacco 

40-5 

1852  :    Current  of  washed  air.* 

Autumn  Colza . , 
Spring  Wheat  . . 

Sunflower , 

Summer  Colza  . , 
Summer  Colza  . , 


0  0480 
0  -0290 
0-0160 
0 -1730 
0  -1050   j 


0  -2260 
0  0650 
0-4080 
0  -5950 
0  -7010 


0-1780 
0  -0360 
0-3920 
0-4220 
0-5960 


4-7 
2-2 
25-5 
3-4 
6-7 


1854 :   Current  of  washed  air  (under  superintendence  of  a  C 

ommission) . 

Cress 

0  -0099 
0-0038 
0  -0039 

0-0097 
0  -0530 
0 -0110 

-0-0002 
0  -0492 
0-0071 

10 

Cress 

13-9 

Cress 

2-8 

*  Recherches  Experimentales  sur  la  Vegetation,  par  M.  Georges  Villa,  Paris, 
1853. 


u 


Table  VI. — continued. 


Plants. 


Nitrogen,  grams. 


In  Seed, 
and  Air  j 

and 

Manure, 

if  any. 


In 
Products. 


Gain 

or 
Loss. 


Nitrogen 

in 
Products 

tol 
Supplied. 


1854:   Current  of  washed  air  {closed,  superintended  by  a  Commission)  * 

Cress , 

0  -O063 

0  -0350 

0  -0287 

5*6 

1855  and  1856  :  In  pure  air,  icith  0*5  <jra7n  Nitre  =  0'ub9  Nitrogen.f 

Colza 

0-0700 
0 -0700 
0 -0700 

0  -0700]: 
0-0660+ 
0  -0680]: 

0  -0000 
-0-0040 
-0-0020 

1  -0 

Colza 

0-9 

Colza 

1  -0 

1855  and  1856  :  In  free  air,  ivith  1  gram  Nitre  =  0-138  Nitrogen.f 

Colza . 
Colza . 
Colza . 
Colza . 


0-1400 
0-1400 
0  -1400 
0-1400 


0  -19701 
0  -3740f 
0  -21601 
0  -2500^ 


0 -0570 
0  -2340 
0  -0760 
0  -1100 


1-41 
2-67 
1-54 
1-79 


1856: 

In  free  air,  with  0'792  gram  Nitre 

=  0-110  Nitrogen.f 

Wheat  

0-1260 
0-1260 

0  -2180t 
0  -22401 

0  -0920 
0  0980 

1-7 

Wheat  

1-8 

1855: 

In  free  air,  with  1'72  grams  Nitre  - 

=  0-238  Nitrogen.f 

Wheat 

0  -2590 

0  -30801 

0  0490 

1-2 

1856: 

In  free  ai"',  witS  1-765  grams  Nitre 

=  0-244  Nitrogeyi.f 

Wheat 

0  -2650 
0  -2650 

0  -21701 
0  -3500J 

-00480 
+  0-0850 

0-8 

Wheat  

1-3 

These  results,  as  well  as  those  of  others,  we  have  fully  discussed 
elsewhere  {Phil.  Trans.,  1859,  aud  Jour.  Chem.  Soc,  vol.  xvi,  1863),  and 
we  can  only  very  briefly  refer  to  them  in  this  place. 

The  column  of  actual  gain  or  loss  shows  in  one  case,  with  colza, 
a  gain  of  more  than  1  gram  nitrogen  ;  and  the  amount  in  the  products 
is  more  than  forty-one  times  as  much  as  that  supplied  as  combined 

*  Compt.  rend.,  1855. 

t  Recherches  Experimcntales  sur  la  Vegetation,  1857. 

X  In  plants  only. 


1 


mmmm 


25 


3d 
id 

a, 
ts 
jd 


nitrogen  in  the  seed  and  air.  The  results  with  wheat,  rye,  or  maize, 
showed  very  much  less  of  both  actual  and  proportional  gain.  Experi- 
ments with  sunflower  showed  in  one  case  thirty-fold,  and  with  tobacco 
in  two  cases  more  than  forty-fold,  as  much  in  the  products  as  was 
supplied.  It  will  be  observed,  however,  that  upon  the  whole  M.  G. 
Ville's  later  experiments  showed  considerably  less  both  actual  and 
proportional  gain  than  his  earlier  ones. 

M.  G.  Ville  in  some  cases  attributed  the  gain  to  the  large  leaf 
surface.  In  explanation  of  the  assimilation  of  free  nitrogen  by  plants, 
he  calls  attention  to  the  fact  that  nascent  hydrogen  is  said  to  give 
ammonia,  and  nascent  oxygen  nitric  acid,  with  free  nitrogen,  and  he 
asks :  Why  should  not  the  nitrogen  in  the  juices  of  the  plant  combine 
with  the  nascent  carbon  and  oxygen  in  the  leaves  ?  He  refers  to  the 
supposition  of  M.  De  Luca,  that  the  nitrogen  of  the  air  combines  with 
the  nascent  oxygen  given  off  by  the  leaves  of  plants,  and  to  the  fact 
that  the  juice  of  some  plants  (mushrooms)  has  been  observed  to 
ozonise  the  oxygen  of  the  air,  and  he  asks  :  Is  it  not  probable,  then, 
that  the  nitrogen  dissolved  in  the  juices  will  submit  to  the  action  of 
the  ozonised  oxygen  with  which  it  is  mixed,  when  we  bear  in  mind 
that  the  juices  contain  alkalies,  and  penetrate  tissues,  the  porosity  of 
which  exceeds  that  of  spongy  platinum  ? 

The  following  table  (VII)  summarises  the  results  of  M.  Boussin- 
ganlt.  His  experiments  on  the  subject  commenced  in  1837,  and  were 
continued  at  intervals  up  to  1858.  The  conditions  of  each  set  of  ex- 
periments as  to  soil,  air,  or  application  of  manurial  substances,  are 
given  in  the  table. 

Table  VII. 

Results  of  M.  Boussingault's  Experiments  to  determine  whether  Plants 

assimilate  free  Nitrogen. 


Plants. 


Nitrogen,  grams. 


In  Seed, 

or  Plants ; 

and 

Manure, 

if  any. 


In 
Products. 


Gain 

or 
Loss. 


Nitrogen 

in 
Produets 

to  1 
Supplied. 


1837  :  Burnt  soil,  distilled  water,  free  air,  in  closed  summer-house. 


Trefoil 
Trefoil 
Wheat 
Wlieat 


0-1100 
0-1140 
0  0130 
0-0570 


0-1200 
0-1560 
0  -0400 
0  -0600 


+  0  0100 
+  0-0420 
-0  0030 
+  0-0030 


1-09 
1-37 
0-93 
105 


*  Ann.  Ch.  Phys.  [2],  Ixvii.  (1838). 


26 


Table   Yl\.— continued. 


Plants. 


Nitrogen,  grams. 


In  Seed, 

or  Plants ; 

and 

Miinure, 

if  anj. 


In 
Products. 


Gain 

or 
Loss. 


Nitrogen 

in 
Products 

tol 
Supplied. 


1838  :   Conditions  as  in  1837.* 

Peas 

0  -0  IfJO 
0  -0330 
0  -0590 

0  -1010 
0  -OoGO 
0  -0530 

+  0  -OooO 
+  0  -0230 
-0-0060 

2-20 

Trefoil  (Plants)     

Oats  (Plants')    

1-70 
0-90 

1851  and  '52  :    Washed  and  iijnited  lonmice  with  ashes,  distilled  ivater, 
limited  air,  under  glass  shade,  tvith  Carbonic  Acid.f 


Haricot,  1851 
Oats,  1851..  . 
Haricot,  1852 
Haricot,  1852 
Oats,  1852... 


0-0319 
0-0078 
0-0210 
0-0215 
0  -0031 


0  -0340 
0-0067 
0  -0189 
0  -0226 
0  -0030 


-0-0009 
■O-OOll 
■0-0021 
-0-0019 
-0-0001 


0-97 
0-86 
0-90 
0-92 
0-97 


1803  :  Prepared  pumice,  or  burnt  brick,  tvith  ashes,  distilled  water, 
limited  air,  in  glass  globe,  ivith  Carbonic  Acid.i 


White  Lupin 
White  Lupin 
White  Lupin 
White  Lupin 
White  Lupin 
Dwarf  Haricot 
Dwarf  Haricot 
Garden  Cress 
White  Lupin 


04S0 
1282 
0319 
0200 
0399 
0354 
0298 
0013 
■1827 


0  -04S3 
0  1246 
0  -0339 
0  -0204 
0  -0397 
0  0360 
0-0277 
0  0013 
0-1697 


-H  0-0003 

1- 

-0-0036 

0- 

-0-00 10 

0- 

+  0  -0004 

1- 

-0-0002 

1- 

+  0  -0006 

1- 

-  0  -0021 

0- 

0  -OOOO 

1- 

-0-0130 

0- 

-01 

1-97 
•97 
•02 
-00 
•02 

•  •93 
•00 

193 


1854:   Prepared  pumice  with  ashes,  distilled,  water,  current  of  washed 
air,  and  Carbonic  Acid,  in  glazed  casc.'l 


Lupin    

Dwarf  Harir-ot 
Dwarf  Haricot 
Dwarf  Haricot 
Dwarf  Haricot 

Lupin    

Lupin    

Cress 


0196 
0322 
0«35 
0339 
0676 
0 -0180 
0  •0175 
0  -0O16 


0-0187 

-0-0009 

0-95 

0  -0325 

+  0  ^0003 

1-01 

0  0:541 

-f-  0  ^0006 

1-02 

0  •0329 

-0-0010 

0-97 

0  ^0666 

-0-0010 

0-99 

1 0^0334 
0  -0052 

-0-0021 

0-94 

+  0-0006 

113 

*  Ann.  Ch.  Pliys.  [2],  Ixix.  (1838). 

t  Ann.  Cli.  Phys.  [3],  xli.  (1854). 

I  Ann.  Ch.  Phjs.,  Sor.  [3],  xliii.  (1855). 


27 


Table  VII. — continued. 


Plants. 


iV'itrogen,  gram  3. 


In  Si!0(l, 

or  Plants ; 

and 

Manuro, 

if  any. 


Tn 

Products. 


Gain 

or 
Loss. 


Nitrogen 

in 
Product.s 

to  I 
Supplied. 


1851,  '52,  '53,  a7id  '54;:  Prej^ctred  soil,  or  pumice  ivith  ashes ;   distilled 
water,  free  air,  under  glazed  case.* 


Haricot  (dwarf),  1851. 

Haricot,  1852   

Haricot,  1853    

Haricot  ( ' 
Lupin  (w    ' 

Lupin,  I80 1 

Lupin,  1851 

Gars,  1852 

VV'lieat,  1853 

Garden  Cress,  185 1. 


),  185A. ... 
1853    .... 


0  -0.3 19 
0  0213 
0  0293 
0 -0318 
0  0214 
0  0109 
0  -OSfi? 
0  0031 
0  -OOfi  l 
0  -0259 


0  -0380 
0-0238 
0-0270 
0  -0350 
0  0256 
0  -0229 
0  -0387 
0-00  it 
0  -0075 
0  0272 


+  0-0031 
+  0  0025 
-0-0023 
+  0-0032 
+  0-0042 
+  0  0030 
+  0-0020 
+  0-0010 
+  0-0011 
+  0.0013 


•09 
-12 
•92 
-10 
-20 
-15 
•05 
•32 
•17 
•05 


1858  :  Nitrate  of  Potassium  as  Ma^mre.f 


Heliantlius 


1 


0^01 11 J 
0  -025  j; 


0  0130 
0-0245 


-0-0014 
■  0^0010 


0^90 
0  96 


The  last  two  columns  of  the  table  (VII)  show  the  actual  and  pro- 
portional gain  or  loss  of  nitrogen  in  M.  Boussingault's  experiments. 
It  will  be  seen  that  in  his  earlier  experiments,  those  in  free  air  in  a 
summer  house,  the  leguminous  plants,  trefoil  and  peas,  did  indicate  a 
notable  gain  of  nitrogen:  but,  in  all  his  subsequent  experiments,  there 
was  generally  either  a  slight  loss,  or,  if  a  gain,  it  was  represented  in  only 
fractions,  or  low  units,  of  milligrams.  After  20  years  of  varied  and 
laborious  investigation  of  the  subject,  M.  Boussingault  concluded  that 
plants  have  not  the  power  of  assimilating  the  free  nitrogen  of  the  atmo- 
sphere. And  in  a  letter  received  from  him  as  recently  as  1876,  after 
discussing  several  aspects  of  the  question,  he  says : — 

"  If  there  is  one  fact  perfectly  demonstrated  in  physiology,  it  is 
this  of  the  non-assimilation  of  free  nitrogen  by  plants ;  and  I  may 
add  by  plants  of  an  inferior  order,  such  as  my^oderms  and  mush- 
rooms."— (Translation.) 

Our  own  experiments  on  this  sub'oct  were  commenced  in  1857, 
and  a  young  American  chemist,  the  late  Dr.  Pugh,  of  the  Pennsylvania 

*  Ann.  Ch.  Phys.,  S6r.  [3],  xliii.  (1855). 
t  Compt.  rend.,  xlvii.  (1858). 
X  Nitrogen  in  Seed  and  Nitrate. 


28 


Table  VIII. 

Jlesalts  of  Experiments  made  at  Bothamsted  to  determine  whether  Plants 

assimilate  free  Nitrogen. 


Nitrogen,  grams. 


In  Seed, 

and 
Maniu-e, 
if  any. 


In 

Plants, 

Pot,  and 

Soil. 


Gain 

or 
Loss. 


Nitrogen 

in 
Products 

to  1 
Supplied. 


With  NO  combined  Nitrogen  supplied  beyond  that  in  the  seed  sown. 


p  1857 

f  Wheat.... 
■<  Barley .... 
[  Barley .... 

0-0080 
0  -0056 
0 -0056 

0-0072 
0  0072 
0  0082 

-0-0008 
+  0-0016 
+  0-0026 

0-90 
1-11 
1-46 

Gramineae  . . . .  ■ 

1858 

["Wheat.... 
•<  Barley .... 
[Oats 

0  -0078 
0  -0057 
0-0063 

0-0081 
0  -0058 
0-0056 

+  0-0003 
+  0  0001 
-0-0007 

1-04 
102 
0-89 

1858 

r  Wheat .... 
X  Oats 

0  -0078 
0-0064 

0-0078 
0-0063 

0-0000 
-0-0001 

1-00 
0-98 

P  1857 

Beans  .... 

0  -0796 

0  -0791 

-0-0005 

0-99 

Leguminosee   . .  ■ 

lt')8 

f  Beans  .... 
LPeas 

0-0750 
0-0188 

0  -0757 
0  -0167 

+  0-0007 
-0-0021 

I'Ol 
0-89 

Other  Plants  . . 

1858 

r  Buck-       l 
L  wheat  . .  J 

0 '0200 

0  -0182 

-0-0018 

0-91 

With  combined  Nitrogen  supplied  beijond  that  in  the  seed  sown. 


Graminese 


rWheat . 

l_Barley . 

f  Wheat. 

1858   <  Barley . 

[  Oats . . . 


1858 
A* 


Leguminossc 


I 


1858 


1858 


r  Wheal. 
<  Barley . 
L  Oats     . 

/  Peas. .  . 
\  Clover . 

3ean8  . 


Other  Plants..       1858  {^£;     _  } 


0-0329 
0-0329 
0  0326 
0  -0268 

0  -0548 
0  -0496 
0-0312 

0  -0268 
0  -0257 
0  -0260 

0  -0227 
0  0712 

0  0711 


0  0308 


0383 
0331 
0328 
0337 

0536 
04G4 
0216 

0274 
0242 
0193 

0211 
0065 


0  -0655 


0-0292 


+  0-0054 
+  0-0002 
+  0  -0002 
+  0 -0069 

-0  -0012 
-0-0032 
-0-0096 

+  0-0006 
-0-0015 
-0-0062 

-0-0016 
-0  0047 

-0-0056 


-0-0016 


16 
01 
01 
25 

98 
94 
69 

02 
94. 
76 

93 
93 


0-92 


0-95 


*  Those  experiments  were  conducted  in  the  apparatus  of  M.  G.  Villa. 


29 


State  Agricultural  College,  devoted  between  two  and  three  years  to 
the  investigation  at  Rothamsted.  The  conditions  of  the  experiments, 
and  the  results  obtained  up  to  that  date,  are  fully  described  in  the 
papers  in  the  Fhilosopldcal  Transactions  for  1859,  and  in  the  Journal 
of  the  Chemical  Society  in  1863,  already  referred  to.  Table  VIII 
(p.  28)  summarises  the  results  obtained. 

The  upper  part  of  the  table  shows  the  results  obtained  in  the  experi- 
ments in  which  no  combined  nitrogen  was  supplied  beyond  that  con- 
tained in  the  seed  sown.  The  growth  was  in  all  cases  extremely  re- 
stricted ;  and  the  figures  show  that  there  was  in  no  case,  whether  of 
Graminese,  Leguminosse,  or  buckwheat,  %  gain  indicated  by  as  much  as 
3  milligrams  of  nitrogen.  There  was  in  most  cases  much  less  gain,  or 
a  slight  loss. 

The  lower  part  of  the  table  shows  the  results  obtained  when  the 
plants  were  supplied  with  known  quantities  of  combined  nitrogen,  in 
the  form  of  a  solution  of  ammonium  sulphate  applied  to  the  soil.  The 
actual  gains  or  losses  rauge  a  little  higher  in  these  experiments,  with 
larger  quantities  of  nitrogen  involvtid  ;  but  they  are  always  represented 
by  units  of  milligrams  only,  and  the  losses  are  higher  than  the  gains. 
Further,  the  gains,  such  as  they  are,  are  all  in  the  experiments  with 
the  Gramineae,  whilst  there  is  in  each  case  a  loss  with  the  Leguminosee 
and  the  buckwheat. 

It  should  be  stated  that  the  growth  was  far  more  healthy  with  the 
Gramineae  than  with  the  Leguminosse,  which  are  even  in  the  open  field 
very  susceptible  to  vicissitudes  of  heat  and  moisture,  and  were  espe- 
cially so  when  inclosed  under  glass  sliades.  It  might  be  objected, 
therefore,  that  the  negative  results  with  the  Leguminosse  are  not  so 
conclusive  as  those  with  the  Graminese.  Nevertheless,  we  do  not  hesi- 
tate to  conclude  from  our  own  experiments,  as  Boussingault  did  from 
his,  that  the  evidence  is  strongly  against  the  supposition  that  either 
the  Graminese  or  the  Leguminosse  assimilate  the  free  nitrogen  of  the 
atmosphere. 


Recapitdlation. 

In  the  foregoing  re'smne  of  mostly  previously  recorded  facts,  we 
have  shown  the  amount  of  nitrogen  assimilated  by  various  crops  over 
a  given  area,  wlien  grown  for  many  years  in  succession  on  the  same 
land  without  any  nitrogenous  manure ;  that  is,  under  conditions  in 
which  the  source  of  the  nitrogen  is  as  little  as  possible  obscured  by 
the  influence  of  indefinite  amounts  available  from  manure. 

It  has  been  shown  that  tlie  determined  amounts  of  combined  nitrogen 
annually  coming  down  in  the  measured  aqueous  deposits  from  the 


^.i 


30 


atmosphere  in  the  open  country  are  entirely  insufficient  to  do  more 
than  supply  a  small  proportion  of  the  nitrogen  assimilated  by  crops  so 
grown. 

With  regar  '^'^her  possible  supplies  of  already  combined  nitrogen 
from  the  atmoH^  e  to  the  soil,  it  has  been  pointed  out  that  there  is 
no  direct  quantitative  evidence  at  command,  and  that  such  evidence 
as  docs  exist  leads  to  the  conclusion  that  such  supplies  are  very  limited 
and  inadequate. 

The  same  may  be  said,  even  in  a  greater  degree,  of  the  supposed 
combination  of  the  free  nitrogen  of  the  air  within  the  soil ;  also  of 
the  supposition  that  plants  take  up  any  material  jjroportion  of  their 
nitrogen  from  combined  nitrogen  in  the  atmosphere  by  their  leaves. 

Finally,  it  has  been  concluded  that  the  balance  of  direct  experi- 
mental evidence  is  decidedly  against  the  supposition  that  plants 
assimilate  the  free  nitrogen  of  the  atmosphere.  Indeed,  the  strongest 
argument  that  we  know  of  in  favour  of  such  a  supposition  is  that,  in 
defect  of  other  conclusive  evidence,  some  such  explanation  of  the 
facts  of  production  would  seem  to  be  needed. 


W'i 


The  Nitrogen  of  the  Soil  as  a  Soukce  of  the  Nitrogen  of 

Crops. 

We  now  turn  to  that  part  of  the  subject  which  it  is  the  special 
object  of  this  communication  to  bring  furward,  namely,  the  determi- 
nations of  nitrogen  in  the  soils  of  some  of  the  experimental  fields  at 
Rothamsted,  the  yield  of  nitrogen  in  which  has  been  given,  and  to 
show  the  bearing  of  the  results  on  the  question  of  the  sources  of  the 
nitrogen  of  the  crops. 

We  have  no  wish  or  intention  to  ignore  the  difficulties  inherent  in 
the  treatment  of  the  subject  from  this  point  of  vicAv.  The  difficulty 
of  the  problem  will  at  once  be  recognised  when  it  is  borne  in  mind 
that  a  difference  of  0"001  in  the  percentago  of  nitrogen  in  the  dry  soil 
may  represent  a  difference  of  from  20  to  25  pounds  of  nitrogen  per 
acre  in  a  layer  of  9  inches  in  depth.  Again,  it  is  farther  to  be  borne 
in  mind  that,  in  the  case  of  the  Rothamsted  arable  soils  with  which 
we  have  to  deal,  the  percentage  of  nitrogen  in  the  first  9  inches  of 
depth  is  sometimes  only  about  0"1,  and  seldom  exceeds  0'14  or  0'15  ; 
that  in  the  second  9  inches  it  ranges  from  under  0'07  to  little  over 
0-08;  in  the  third  9  inches  from  under  006  to  about  0'07;  and  that 
in  the  lower  depths  is  rather  lower  still. 

It  will  be  seen,  therefore,  that  if  any  quantitative  estimates  are  to  be 
based  on  the  percentage  amounts  of  nitrogen  determined  in  samples 


31 


I 


of  soil  from  different  depths,  the  greatest  care  must  be  taken  to  insure 
that  the  samples  truly  represent  the  exact  depth  supposed.  The  mode 
usually  adopted  of  taking  samples  of  an  indefinite  area,  perhaps  not 
to  a  definite  depth,  and  ahncsfc  certainly  not  of  uniform  breadth  or 
width  to  the  depth  taken,  is  obviously  quite  inapplicable  for  the 
purposes  of  any  such  inquiry  as  tliat  here  supposed. 

Another  difficulty  is  that,  in  the  case  of  subsoils,  with  a  low  actual 
percentage  of  nitrogen,  the  variations  in  the  amount  in  different 
samples  are  often  proportionally  great,  and  obviously  unconnected 
with  the  special  history  of  the  plot. 

Unfortunately,  the  few  samples  of  soil  that  were  collected  in  the 
early  years  of  the  Rothamsted  field  experiments  were  not  taken  in 
such  a  manner  as  to  afford  results  applicable  to  our  purpose.  Com- 
mencing in  1856,  however,  the  mode  adopted  has  been,  after  carefully 
levelling  the  soil,  to  drive  down  a  square  frame,  made  of  strong  sheet- 
iron,  open  at  top  and  bottom,  and  of  an  exact  area,  and  of  an  exact 
depth,  to  the  level  of  the  surface.  The  inclosed  soil  is  then  carefully 
taken  out,  and  its  weight  determined.  The  soil  around  the  frame  is 
then  removed  to  the  level  of  its  lower  edge,  aiid  it  is  again  driven 
down,  and  the  inclosed  soil  removed  ;  and  this  process  is  repeated 
until  the  desired  depth  of  sampling  is  reached. 

Of  surface  soils,  samples  are  taken  from  three,  four,  or  as  many  as 
eight  places  on  the  same  plot.  A  portion  of  each  such  sample  is  kept 
separate,  as  a  means  of  testing  the  range  of  variation,  and,  if  need  be, 
of  correction  in  case  of  any  abnormal  results  due  to  accidental  animal 
droppings,  or  other  causes.  Another  portion  of  each  separate  sample 
of  the  surface  soil  is  used  to  make  a  mixture  of  all.  In  the  case  of  the 
subsoils,  the  separate  samples  of  corresponding  depth  from  the  same  plot 
are,  as  a  rule,  at  once  mixed.  Surface  soils  are  sometimes  taken  of  an 
area  of  12  by  12  inches,  but  frequently  of  only  6  by  G  inches,  and 
subsoils  almost  invariably  of  the  smaller  area.  The  depth  of  each 
sample  is  generally  9  inches ;  but  in  some  special  cases  it  has  been 
only  3  inches,  and  in  some  6  inchcF.  It  is  perhaps  to  be  regretted 
that  the  depth  originally  fixed  upon  did  not  more  nearly  represent  that 
to  which  the  soil  is  more  directly  affected  by  the  mechanical  operations, 
and  by  the  application  of  manure,  say  G  inches.  But  having  originally 
adopted  9  inches,  it  has  been  necessary  to  adhere  to  this  depth  sub- 
sequently, in  order,  as  far  as  possible,  to  obtain  comparable  results  at 
different  dates. 

The  soils  when  brought  to  the  laboratory  are  first  broken  up,  and 
then  partially  dried  in  a  stove-room  at  a  temperature  of  about  130°  F., 
to  arrest  nitrification,  which  would  be  liable  to  take  place  if  the  soils 


Ill 

I:  I 


32 

were  moist.  Next,  the  stones  are  removed  ;  first  those  retained  by  a 
sieve  of  1-inch  mesh,  next  by  a  sieve  of  one. half-inch  mesh,  and  then 
by  a  one-foarth-inch  sieve.  All  that  passes  the  ono-fourth-inch  sieve 
is  termed  the  mould.  Portions  of  this  are  very  finely  powdered  and 
sifted  for  analysis ;  and  the  weights  being  recorded  at  each  stage  of 
preparation,  and  the  water  lost  on  drying  at  100°  C.  being  determined 
on  the  finely-powdered  mould,  all  results  of  analysis  are  calculated 
into  percentage  on  the  so-determined  dry  mould.  From  the  same  data 
the  amount  of  dry  mould  per  acre  is  calculated,  and  upon  this  the 
amount  of  nitrogen  per  acre.  It  will  be  seen  further  on,  that  not- 
withstanding the  means  adopted  to  secure  uniformity,  the  amounts  of 
dry  mould  per  acre  calculated  for  a  given  depth,  from  the  samples 
taken,  vary  considerably  for  the  same  field  at  diffc'rent  times,  accord- 
ing to  the  dryness  or  wetness  of  the  season,  the  condition  of  the  land 
as  affected  by  the  crop,  the  mechanical  operations,  and  other  circum- 
stances. The  amounts  also  vary  very  considerably  for  the  soils  of 
adjoining  fields. 

Nitrogen  in  the  Soils  of  the  Experimental  Wheat  Plots. 

The  first  series  of  determinations  of  nitrogen  to  which  attention 
will  be  called  relates  to  those  made  in  the  soils  of  some  of  the  plots  of 
Broadbalk  field,  which  has  now  grown  wheat  for  thirty-nine  years  in 
succession,  and  the  yield  of  nitrogen  in  which,  on  the  plots  receiving 
no  nitrogen  in  manure,  has  been  given  in  Table  I.  It  will  be  remem- 
bered that,  under  those  conditions,  there  was  a  very  marked  decline 
in  the  annual  yield  of  nitrogen  in  the  crop,  both  without  any  manure, 
and  with  a  mixed  mineral  manure  used  alone. 

The  first  wheat  crop  of  the  series  was  harvested  in  1844,  and 
although  isolated  samples  of  the  soil  were  taken  in  the  early  years,  it 
was  not  until  1856  that  any  were  collected  on  the  plan  now  followed. 
At  that  date  only  four  plots  were  sampled,  and  only  to  the  depth  of 
the  first  9  inches.  Eight  samples  were,  however,  taken  from  each 
plot,  each  12  by  12  inches  area,  and  the  eight  were  mixed  together. 
In  1865,  samples  were  taken  from  eleven  plots,  from  eight  places  on 
each  plot,  each  sample  12  by  12  inches  area,  and  this  time  to  a  depth 
three  times  9  inches,  or  to  a  total  depth  of  27  inches.  Lastly,  in  1881, 
twenty  plots  were  sampled  ;  six  samples,  each  6  by  6  inches  area, 
were  taken  from  each  plot,  and  in  each  case  to  three  depths  of  9  inches 
each,  or  in  all  to  27  inches. 

Thus,  it  is  only  in  1865  and  1881  that  we  have  any  considerable 
series  of  samples,  and  the  nitrogen  determined  in  them ;  that  is,  in 
1865  after  the  twenty-second,  and  in   1881   after  the  thirty-eighth 


M/' 


83 


a 
m 

re 

id 

of 
ed 


crop  had  been  removed.  It  is  obvious  that,  if  tho  results  at  these 
two  periods  are  to  be  compared,  we  must  first  determine  whether  the 
samples  taken  represent  layers  of  equal  depth  and  weight  in  the  two 
cases.  Confining  attention  on  the  present  occasion  to  the  results 
relating  to  the  first  9  inches  of  depth,  the  following  figures  show  the 
average  weight  of  dry  mould  per  acre ;  that  is,  of  soil  excluding 
stones  and  moisture,  calculated  from  the  weight  of  the  samples  taken, 
and  from  the  results  of  the  mechanical  separation,  and  of  the  deter- 
mination of  moisture  in  the  soils.  For  18G5,  tho  calculations  are 
based  on  the  results  afforded  by  80  samples,  eight  from  each  of  ten 
of  the  eleven  plots,  the  eleventh  being  the  one  annually  receiving 
farmyard  manure  ;  and  for  1881  they  are  based  on  the  results  relating 
to  114  samples,  that  is,  six  samples  each  from  19  plots,  again 
excluding  the  one  with  farmyard  manure. 


Number  of  Samples. 


1865,  10  plots,  8  samples  from  eacli 
1881,  19  plots,  6  samples  from  each 


Calculated 

dry  Mould 

per  Acre. 


lbs. 
2,299,038 
2,552,202 


ITU 

s 


Tho  importance  of  taking  samples  of  definite  area  and  depth,  and 
of  determining  the  weights,  is  here  strikingly  illustrated.  Thus,  it  is 
obvious  that  the  samples  analysed  in  1881  represented,  on  the  average, 
almost  exactly  one-ninth  more  soil  per  acre  than  those  analysed  in 
1865.  In  other  words,  if  the  samples  of  1865  fairly  represented 
9  inches  of  depth  in  the  average  condition  of  consolidation  of  the  soil, 
those  of  1881  represented  10  inches  of  soil  in  the  same  condition : 
that  is,  they  included  1  inch  more  of  subsoil,  with  its  much  lower 
percentage  of  nitrogen  than  the  9  inches  above  it.  It  may,  of  course, 
be  a  question  whether  the  condition  of  consolidation  of  the  soil  was 
the  more  normal  at  the  one  period  or  at  the  other.  It  would,  how- 
ever, make  scarcely  any  difFerence  in  the  relation  of  the  results  to  one 
another  at  the  two  periods,  whether  the  actually  determined  per- 
centas-es  of  nitroeren  in  the  1865  samples  were  lowered,  on  the 
assumption  that  they  should  have  included  1  inch  more  of  subsoil,  or 
whether  the  determined  percentages  in  the  1881  samples  are  raised, 
on  the  assumption  that  they  contained  1  inch  too  much  of  subsoil. 
We  have  concluded,  from  a  consideration  of  all  the  facts  afc  command, 
that  the  latter  alternative  is  upon  the  whole  the  best.     We  adopt, 

c 


m/ 


34 


therefore,  the  percentages  of  nitrogen  as  actually  determined  in  the 
166;')  samples,  and  we  assume  the  weight  of  dry  mould  (9  inches  deep) 
represented  by  the  samples  to  be  2,300,000  pounds  per  acre.  But,  in 
the  case  of  the  1881  samples,  we  assume  that  one-tenth  of  the  heavier 
weight  had  the  composition  determined  iu  the  second  9  inches  (it 
would  be  very  slightly  higher),  and  the  percentage  in  the  remaining 
nine-tenths,  representing  2,300,000  pounds  of  surface  soil,  is  raised  by 
calculation  accordingly. 

The  following  table  (IX,  p.  35)  gives  for  the  surface  soils  (9  inches 
deep),  of  the  unmanured  plot,  and  the  nine  artificially  manured  plots, 
sampled  in  1805,  the  actually  determined  percentages  of  nitrogen  in 
the  dry  mould ;  and  for  the  1881  samples  from  the  same  plots,  it  gives 
both  the  actually  determined  percentages,  and  the  corrected  percentages 
calculated  as  above  described.  The  table  also  shows  the  amount  of 
nitrogen  per  acre,  reckoning  2,300,000  pounds  of  dry  mould,  calculated 
for  1805  according  to  the  actually  determined  percentages,  and  for 
1881  according  to  the  corrected  percentages.  The  quantities  per  acre 
more  (  +  ),  or  less  (  — ),  in  1881  than  in  1805  are  also  given.  Lastly, 
for  each  period,  there  are  given  the  quantities  more  or  less  on  each  of 
the  other  plots  than  on  plot  5a,  which  received  the  mineral  manure 
alone. 

As  already  said,  in  1865  the  land  had  grown  twenty-two  crops  of 
wheat  in  succession,  and  in  1881  thirty-eight  crops.  Plot  3  had  been 
unmanured  from  the  commencement.  Plot  lOci  received  mineral 
manure  in  the  first  year,  but  the  ammonium  salts  alone  each  year 
since.  The  remaining  plots  were  somewhat  variously  manured  during 
the  first  eight  of  the  thirty-eight  years  ;  but  (excepting  plot  16)  each 
has  been  manured  every  year  for  the  last  thirty  of  the  thirty-eight 
years,  as  described  in  the  table. 

It  will  be  observed  that,  for  every  plot,  the  actual  determinations 
show  a  lower  percentage  of  nitrogen  in  1881  than  in  1865,  The  cor- 
rected percentages  for  1881  are,  of  course,  all  rather  higher  than  the 
actual  determinations ;  and  they,  in  some  cases,  show  a  higher,  and  in 
others  a  lower,  percentage  than  in  1865.  Nevertheless,  it  cannot  fail 
to  be  noted  that  the  relation  of  plot  to  plot  is  essentially  accordant  at 
the  two  periods. 

The  significance  of  the  results  will,  however,  be  rendered  the  more 
appai'ent  on  an  examination  of  the  calculated  quantities  per  acre.  It 
is  obvious  that  absolute  accuracy  cannot  be  claimed  for  such  figures, 
but  the  general  accordance  of  the  indications  at  the  two  periods  is 
such  as  to  leave  no  doubt  of  their  import. 

Keeping  in  view  the  special  object  of  this  communication,  which 


35 


he 

P) 
in 

ior 

(it 

ng 
by 


CO 

l-( 
O 
02 


M 


Hi 


03 
O 


8 


S      00 


S 

r 

22 

o6 


>> 

1> 

£ 

a^ 

c1 

»* 

K 

s 

o 

a 

O 

PI 

fc. 

s^ 

kl 

?*: 

■e 

c 

O 


.o 


'4J 

o 


o 


lO 


^  I 


5    I 


M        05  -O 

W         54  i-H 

+  +    + 


05 


CO         CO 

(N      eo 

+       + 


00 

CO 


00 


M     I 


00 

X 


^  CO 


o 

00 
»0 


U5  CO 

i.O  -*< 

l«  l-H 

+  + 


2? 

eo 
+ 


CO      CO 

+     + 


10 

T 


+ 


05 

+ 


O 


+ 


^*;? 


^  r-l   -N 
-11  + 


O        C5  t>. 


CO        05 
^        00 


+     I  I 


10 

o 

00 


o  'T  CO 
«  M  (N 


00 


(N 


CO  iH 
00  l>. 
00  -^ 
(N  7i 


'J 
I- 

o 


lO 

o 


CO 
00 

IN 


a  1.0  lo      00 


Tfl  00 

CO  •+ 

O)  lO 

(N  74 


CO 
05 

IN 


00 
00 


.   T3 


■w  lO  5<l  Tf( 
S  -*  rt  to 
goo        iN 


CO  ^        ^ 
lO  l^       o 

C^    O  F-t 


<N 


,i!oo 
^1 


oo 


e8 
u 


00 


3 
u 


^OO 


O  o 


p^ 


O  O 


O  o 


^^ 

/^  >o 

t  ' 

p.  00 
«-• 

0)    rt 


!^ 


go     o 
+       I 


« 


•*        (N 


05         CO 
!>.         CO 

l-H  CO 


ri      o 

't        10 
CO 


-ft  r- 

Oi  lO 

!■«•  lO 

IN  (N 


00  -"Jl  CO 

!>.  l>.  10 

i>  1^  t>. 

!^  IN  IN 


lO       >o 
IN        IN 


IN 


IN 


'"  C>  rt  t>.  O  -H  p-(  lO  r-t  CO  CD 

i-,  ©  00  O  O  CO  IN  lO  05  ID  O 

gOC5  IN  INO  rH  iH  r-t  i-l  O 

.1— lO  i-H  I— lr-(  r-l  iH  iH  pH  r-l 


■S005  O  INX  pH  00  O  1>  -^ 

C  ClrH  M  coo  t^  O  O  05  O 

SOrH  IN  e^i-<  f-l  IN  IN  l-H  IN 

.1-Hi-H  i-H  I— li-H  l-H  pH  pH  iH  l-H 


01 
O 


■-3 
C 
e3 


^ 

d 

3 

eo 

S3 

"i* 

r- 

on 

'"' 

t-H 

rt 

r—^ 

0) 

O 

C 

L. 

3 

c 

S 

« 

rS 

1".J 

c 

X 

c 

tJg 

a 
a 

ID 

3 
3 


o 


T5 
3 

2" 

3 

3 

F-    sS 

bD , 

o  r3 


O)    J< 
O    Hi 

3    f^ 
3 


« 


UQ 


10   3 

2   " 

3    SC 
o  p 

o  .-S 

m  F-H 
o    II    " 


o 

,3 
<— 

V 

P. 
3 


ft- 

&^ 

3 


•     CD 

.  o 

:£- 

■   ft^ 

.    3 

i     91 


3 

:  cs 


3  •  a 
P  2 
"S  2  c 


m  I 


I  CD 


£  3i;  3-0 


.   3  „,   3 

O,  aJ    O 

t?  o  5  o 

3  i»     . 

3  js  S  i; 


CO 
00 


CO 

00 


ci 


to   3 

lU 


e.  ^ 


"b  's 
o 


fl3    4)    c 


-73    cS 


S    O    O 


CO 

00.2 


a  5 


S      a      ^<1 


J  ^ 

S  2 

rfl      3 


O    3 

d  2 


SOO    g^# 
II    ^  II     I 

w  r-  3 

Q.  to     C     «     c- 

-O    rt-Sls    3 
3    in    3    n    3 

=^  d  =5  d-^a 

O    c    ^    G    51 

-g  2^  g  § 

-3    3  ,3    3-3 
Png    Ag    3 


O 


eo  lO  t* 


05 


O  r-< 


IN 


C3 

CO 


c  2 


CO 


.a 

to 
O) 

3 
S3 


00 


CO 

I-H 

♦ 


36 


is  to  show  tho  bearing  of  what  may  bo  called  the  nitrogen  statistics  of 
the  soils,  on  tho  question  of  the  sources  of  tho  nitrogen  in  the  crops,  it 
will  be  seen  that,  during  tho  sixteen  years  from  180-5  to  1881,  both 
the  unraanured  plot  (;J),aiul  tho  mineral  manured  plot  (5a),  tho  yield 
of  nitrogen  in  tho  crops  of  which  declined  so  sti-ikingly,  show  a  groat 
reduction  in  tho  stock  of  nitrogen  in  the  surface  soil.  The  reduction 
in  these  later  years  is  considerably  greater  in  tho  surface  soil  of  tho 
mineral  manured  than  in  that  of  tho  entirely  unmanured  plot,  tho 
previous  accu.nulation  in  which  had  been  many  more  years  subject  to 
exhaustion.  Taking  tho  results,  however,  for  the  first,  second,  and 
third  9  inches,  tlie  calcnlatcd  loss  to  the  depth  of  27  inches  is  approxi- 
mately the  same  for  tho  two  plots.  The  figures  recorded  for  tho  first 
9  inches  only  are,  however,  sufficient  to  show  that  tho  decline  in  tho 
yield  of  nitrogen  in  the  crop,  where  none  has  been  supplied  in  manure, 
is  accompanied  by  a  decline  in  the  stock  of  nitrogen  in  the  soil. 

A  further  illustration  on  this  point  is  afforded  by  tho  results  for 
plot  lOa.  For  tho  thixteen  years,  1852 — 1864,  plot  16  received, 
besides  the  mixed  mineral  manure,  twice  as  much  ammonium  salts  as 
any  of  the  other  plots,  tho  results  for  which  arc  given  in  the  table  ; 
and  it  gave  on  the  average  of  those  years  30|  bushels  of  grain  ^er 
acre  per  annum.  Since  18G4,  however,  the  plot  has  been  left  un- 
raanured, and  during  the  seventeen  years,  1865 — 1881,  it  has  yielded  an 
average  of  only  14f  bushels  of  grain;  and  in  recent  years  the  produce 
has  been  very  little  more  than  witliout  manure,  or  with  purely 
mineral  manure.  The  table  shows  that  in  1865,  that  is,  after  one 
crop  had  been  removed  since  the  application  of  the  excess  of  ammo- 
nium salts,  the  surface  soil  still  contained  considerably  more  nitrogen 
than  any  other  plot  in  the  series.  In  1881,  however,  after  sixteen 
years  more  of  cropping  without  manure,  the  stock  of  nitrogen  on  tho 
plot  was  reduced  by  a  greater  amount  than  on  any  other  plot,  and  to 
a  lower  point  than  on  any  other  of  the  ammonium  plots,  excepting 
plot  10  with  the  ammonium  salts  alone. 

Let  us  now  refer  to  the  last  three  columns  in  the  table,  which 
show,  for  each  of  the  plots  receiving  ammonium  salts,  the  amount  of 
nitrogen  per  acre  in  the  surface  soil,  more  or  less  than  in  that  of  plot 
5a,  with  mineral  manure  alone.  All  the  plots,  7  to  14  inclusive, 
received  the  same  quantity  of  nitrogen,  namely  86  pounds  per 
acre  per  annum.  But  it  will  be  seen  that  the  excess  of  nitrogen  in 
the  surface  soils  compared  with  the  mineral  manured  plot  5,  varies 
exceedingly.  In  fact,  it  is  obvious  that  the  amounts  have  no  direct 
relation  to  the  amount  of  nitrogen  supplied  in  the  manure. 

The  following  table  (X)  will  afford  some  explanation  of  the  diffei'- 


M4^ 


of 


37 


ences.  Tho  plots  under  considoration,  all  of  which  received  the  same 
amount  of  nitrogen  in  manure,  are  there  given  in  tlie  order  of  their 
average  annual  increased  yield  of  nitrogen  in  the  crops  over  plot  5. 
The  first  column  shows  the  estimated  average  annual  increased  yield  of 
nitrogen  per  acre  in  the  crops ;  the  second,  the  estimated  annual  loss 
of  nitrogen  as  nitric  acid  by  drainage ;  the  tliird,  the  estimated  pnnual 
excess  of  nitrogen  in  the  surt'ace  soil  over  that  on  plot  5  with  tho 
mineral  manure  alone  ;  and  the  last  column  shows  the  relation  which 
that  excess  in  tho  soil  bears  to  100  increased  yield  of  nitrogen  in  the 
crops 


Tahlk   X. 
.Estimated  Nitrojen  j)er  Aero  per  Annum, 


In 

Excess 

In 

Loss  by 

Surface 

in  Sur- 

PlotB. 

Crops 

Drainage 

Soil 

face  Soil 

over 

over 

9  inches 

to  100 

Plot  5. 

Plot  5. 

deep, over 

increase 

Plot  5. 

in  Crop. 

lbs. 

lbs. 

lbs. 

lbs. 

10 

Ammonia  salts  =  8G  lbs.  nitrogen 

(1845  and  since) 

12-4 

31-2 

4-8 

38-7 

11 

Ammonia  salts  =  8G  lbs.  nitrogen 

and  suporpliosphato 

17-7 

28-5 

11 -G 

G5-5 

12 

Ammonia  salts  =  80  lbs.  nitrogen 

superphosphate  and  soda 

22-2 

24  -5 

14-0 

G5-8 

13 

Ammonia  salts  =  80  lbs.  nitrogen 

siiporpliospliate  and  potash    .... 

23-4 

25-0 

17-8 

76-1 

14 

Ammonia  salts  =  80   bs.  nitrogen 

superphosphate  and  magnesia  . . 

24-1 

27-5 

15-5 

G4-3 

7 

Ammonia  salts  =  80  lbs.  nitrogen 

and  mixed  mineral  manure    .... 

25-9 

19  0 

19-3 

74-5 

9 

Nitrate   soda  =  80   lbs.  nitrogen 

and  mixed  mineral  manure    .... 

26-5 

23-7 

18 -5 

71-2 

It  is  seen  that  tho  increased  yield  of  nitrogen  in  the  crops  also 
varied  exceedingly  with  the  same  amount  supphed  in  manure,  accord- 
ing to  the  condition  as  to  supply  of  mineral  constituents.  Plot  10, 
with  the  ammonium  salts  alone,  gives  the  smallest  increased  yield  of 
nitrogen  in  the  crop ;  and  plots  7  and  9,  with  the  most  complete 
mineral  manure,  each  more  than  twice  as  much;  the  other  plots 
giving  intermediate  amounts. 

The  order  of  the  estimated  loss  of  nitrogen  by  drainage  is  almost 
the  converse  of  that  of  the  increased  yield  in  the  crops.  Plot  10, 
which  gives  the  least  increased  yield  in  the  crop,  shows  the  greatest 


<c 


38 


loss   by  drainage ;    and    plots   7   and   9,   which    yield  the   greatest 
increase  in  the  crop,  show  the  least  loss  by  drainage. 

The  excess  in  the  soils  (over  plot  6)  is  obviously  much  more  in 
the  order  of  the  increased  yield  in  the  crops.  Plot  10,  with  the 
least  in  the  increase  of  crop  and  the  most  in  the  drainage,  shows  the 
least  excess  in  the  soil ;  whilst  plots  7  and  9,  with,  the  greatest 
increased  yield  in  the  crop,  and  the  least  loss  by  drainage,  show  the 
greatest  excess  in  the  soil. 

It  is  clear,  therefore,  that  whilst  the  excess  in  the  soil  has  no 
direct  relation  to  the  amount  supplied  in  the  manure,  it  has  a  very 
obvious  relation  to  the  increased  yield  in  the  crop  ;  in  other  words,  to 
the  amount  of  growth.  The  last  column  of  the  table  brings  this 
out  more  clearly.  Excepting  in  the  case  of  plot  10,  with  the  ammo- 
nium salts  alone,  there  is  a  general  uniformity  in  the  proportion 
of  the  excess  in  the  soil  over  plot  5  to  the  increased  yield  in  the 
crop  over  plot  5  ;  and  the  variations,  such  as  they  are,  have  an 
obvious  connection  with  the  conditions  of  growth.  Thus,  plots  11, 
12,  and  14,  all  with  a  deficient  supply  of  potash,  show  approximately 
equal  proportions  retained  in  the  soil  for  100  of  increase  in  the  crop. 
Plots  13,  7,  and  9,  again,  all  with  liberal  supplies  of  potash,  show 
higher,  but  approximately  equal,  proportions  retained  in  the  surface 
soil  for  100  of  increased  yield  in  the  crop. 

Upon  the  whole,  it  is  obvious  that  the  relative  excess  of  nitrogen 
in  the  soils  of  the  different  plots  is  little,  if  at  all,  due  to  the  direct 
retention  by  the  soil  of  the  nitrogen  of  the  manure,  but  is  almost 
exclusively  dependent  on  the  dift'erence  in  amount  of  the  residue  of 
the  crops — of  the  stubble  and  roots,  and  perhaps  of  weeds. 

Recurring  to  the  main  point  which  it  is  our  object  to  elucidate, 
there  can  be  no  doubt  that  the  determinations  of  nitrogen  in  the  sur- 
face soils  of  the  plots  of  the  experimental  wheat  field,  at  different 
dates,  establish  the  fact  that  the  decline  in  the  yield  of  nitrogen  in 
the  crops,  when  none  is  supplied  in  manure,  is  accompanied  by  a 
decline  in  the  stock  of  nitrogen  in  the  soil. 

It  will  be  well  to  consider,  as  far  as  the  data  at  command  will 
allow,  what  relation  the  yield  of  the  nitrogen  in  the  crops  bears  to 
the  loss  of  nitrogen  by  the  soil  ? 

On  this  point  it  may  be  stated  that,  taking  the  average  of  thirty 
years,  1852 — 1881,  it  is  estimated  that  the  nnmanured  plot  yielded 
18'6  pounds  of  nitrogen  in  the  crops,  and  lost  10"3  pounds  in  the 
drainage,  or  in  all  289  pounds  per  acre  per  annum  over  that  period. 
In  like  manner,  it  is  estimated  that  plot  6,  which  received  nitro- 
genous as  well  as  mineral  manure  during  the  preceding  eight  yeais. 


39 


in 
ho 
he 

est 
ihe 


bat  mineral  manure  alone  during  the  thirty  years,  yielded  an  average 
of  20*3  pounds  of  nitrogen  in  the  crops,  and  12  pounds  in  the  drain- 
age, or  in  all  32 "3  pounds  per  acre  per  annum.  It  would  thus 
appear  that,  without  nitrogenous  manure,  about  30  pounds  of  nitrogen 
has  been  contributed  per  acre  per  annum,  from  some  source,  to  crop 
and  drainage  together.  The  determinations  of  nitrogen  in  the  soils  of 
the  two  plots  indicate  that  they  have  lost  an  average  of  about  two- 
thirds  of  this  amount  annually  to  the  depth  of  27  inches.  There 
would,  therefore,  according  to  this  reckoning,  i-emain  about  one-third 
— say  10  pounds  more  or  less — to  be  contributed  by  seed,  by  rain  and 
condensation  from  the  atmosphere,  and  by  all  the  other  supplies  of 
combined  nitrogen  which  have  been  supposed  to  be  available,  whether 
by  the  combination  of  free  nitrogen  within  the  soil,  or  its  assimilation 
by  the  plant.  Of  this  amount  about  2  pounds  will  be  due  to  seed, 
and  if  we  suppose,  say,  only  5  pounds  to  be  annually  supplied  by  rain 
and  the  minor  aqueous  deposits  from  the  atmosphere,  there  is  but 
little  left  to  be  provided  by  all  the  other  sources  assumed. 

Nitrogen  in  the  Soils  of  the  Experimental  Barley  Plots. 

Unfortunately  we  have  not  so  complete  a  series  of  determinations 
of  nitrogen  in  the  soils  of  the  experimental  barley  plots  as  of  those  in 
the  experimental  wheat  field.  In  1868  four  of  the  barley  plots  were 
sampled.  Four  samples,  each  6  by  6  inches  area,  by  9  inches  deep, 
were  taken  from  each  plot,  and  the  four  mixed  together.  In  March, 
1882,  26  plots  were  sampled,  four  samples  being  taken  from  each  plot, 
each  6  by  6  inches  area,  and  to  the  depth  of  three  times  9,  or  27 
inches.  Of  the  plots  sampled  in  1868  only  one  had  received  no  nitro- 
genous  manure,  but  we  are  able  to  give  the  percentage  of  nitrogen  in 
the  surface  soil  of  this  plot  at  the  two  dates. 

Table  XI. — Hoosfield  Barley  Land. 

Nitrogen^  per  cent,  in  the  dry  Mo^dd,  first  9  inches. 

[Barley,  31  years  in  succession,  1852-1882  inclusive.] 


Description  of  Manure. 

1868. 

1882. 

Per  cent. 
0  1202 

Per  cent. 
0  1124 

The  calculated  average  weights  of  dry  mould  per  acre,  to  the  depth 
of  9  inches,  were  not  very  different  at  the  two  dates.  The  1882  samples 


■  liv  _ 


40 


were,  however,  slightly  the  heavier,  which  vrould  indicate  that,  for 
comparison,  the  percentage  of  nitrogen  given  for  the  latter  date  is 
perhaps  somewhat  too  low.  Still,  it  is  obvious  that,  as  in  the  case  of 
the  "wheat  land,  so  also  in  that  of  the  barley  land,  there  is,  with  the 
decline  in  the  yield  of  nitrogen  in  the  crop  at  the  same  time  a  decline 
in  the  stock  of  the  nitrogen  in  the  soil. 

Nitrogen  in  the  Soils  of  the  Experimental  Boot-crop  Plots. 

The  next  results  relate  to  the  land  upon  which  root-crops — com- 
mon turnips,  swedes,  sugar-beet,  and  mangel-wurzel  (with  the 
exception  of  the  interpolation  of  three  years  of  barley  without 
manure)  have  been  grown  for  forty  years  in  succession,  1843-1882 
inclusive.  Samples  of  the  soil  have  only  been  taken  once,  namely, 
in  April,  1870;  that  is,  after  the  experiment  had  been  continued 
twenty-seven  years.  At  that  time  35  plots  were  sampled,  and  four 
samples  were  taken  from  each  plot,  each  6  by  6  inches  area,  and  to 
a  depth  of  3  times  9,  or  27  inches. 

The  following  table  shows  the  percentage  of  nitrogen  in  the  surface 
soil  of  the  continuously  unmanured  plot,  and  of  three  plots  with 
mineral  manure  alone : — 


Table  XII, — Barnfield  Root-crop  Land. 

Nitrogen,  j)er  cent,  in  dry  Mould,  first  9  inches. 

[Root-crops  (except  barley  three  years)  40  years  in  succession,  1843-1882  inclusive.] 


Description  of  Manure. 


1870. 


Plot  3. — Unmanured    

Plot  4. — Mixed  mineral  manure. .  . . 
Plot  5. — Superphospliate  alone  .... 
Plot  6. — Supcrph'isphate  and  potash 

Mean  of  plots  4,  5,  G. .  . . 


Per  cent. 
0  -0852 


0 -0934 
0  -0888 
0  -0807 


0  -0896 


Having  only  taken  samples  once,  we  have,  of  course,  no  means  of 
comparing  the  condition  of  the  land  as  to  its  percentage  of  nitrogen 
at  different  periods.  The  point  to  b"  observed  in  the  results  given  in 
the  table  is,  that  each  of  these  four  plots,  which  have  received  no  nitro- 
genous manure,  shows,  after  twenty-seven  years  of  experiment  (twenty- 
four  years  roots  and  three  years  barley),  a  lower  percentage  of  nitrogen 


41 


or 

is 

of 

,he 

ine 


in  the  surface  soil  tban  lias  been  found  in  any  of  the  other  experi- 
mental fields ;  though  determinations  made  in  samples  from  other  parts 
of  the  same  field,  and  also  in  an  adjoining  field,  show  considei'ably 
higher  results.  The  nearest  approach  to  so  low  an  amount  in  any 
other  field  is  where  the  land  had  been  under  alternate  wheat  and 
fallow,  without  manure,  for  more  than  thirty  years. 

It  will  be  remembered  that  the  root-crops  gave,  with  mineral 
manure  alone,  a  very  much  higher  yield  of  nitrogen  than  the  cereals 
in  the  earlier  years,  and  as  low  a  yield  in  the  later  years.  That  they 
did  not  give  less  still  is  probably  owing  to  the  fact  that  their  growth 
extends  later  in  the  season  than  that  of  the  cereals,  by  virtue  of 
which  they  are  probably  enabled  to  arrest  the  nitric  acid  formed 
within  the  soil  during  the  early  autumn  months,  which  in  the  case  of 
the  cereals  would  be  more  subject  to  loss  by  drainage. 

Both  the  mechanical  conditions  of  surface  soil  known  to  be  favour- 
able for  the  growth  of  th'^  root-crops,  and  the  large  amount  of  fibrous 
root  they  throw  out  near  the  surface,  are  indications  of  an  active 
demand  on  the  resources  of  the  upper  layers  of  the  soil,  and  are  per- 
fectly consistent  with  the  supposition  that  their  growth  has  led  to  a 
greater  reduction  in  the  stores  of  nitrogen  of  the  superficial  layers 
than  in  the  case  of  any  of  the  other  crops. 

The  evidence  afforded,  both  by  the  facts  of  production,  and  by  the 
determinations  of  nitrogen  in  the  soil,  is  indeed  strongly  in  favour  of 
the  view  that  the  source  of  the  nitrogen  of  the  root-crops,  as  of  the 
cereals,  is,  when  grown  without  nitrogenous  manure,  the  soil  itself, 
and  the  small  quantity  of  combined  nitrogen  annually  contributed  by 
rain,  and  the  minor  aqueous  deposits  from  the  atmosphere.  It  is  said, 
however,  that  these  crops  require  a  certain  amount  of  nitrogen  to  be 
supplied  by  manure,  and  that  they  are  able  to  take  up  the  remainder 
from  atmospheric  sources.  The  facts  of  production  recorded  at  page  11 
afford  no  countenance  to  such  a  view.  We  conclude,  indeed,  that  the 
dependence  of  these  crops  for  their  nitrogen,  on  the  stores  of  the  soil 
itself,  or  on  supplies  by  manure,  is  as  clearly  established  as  in  the  case 
of  the  cereals. 


Is  THE  Soil  a  Source  of  the  Nitrogen  of  the  Leguminos^  ? 

We  have  now  to  consider  the  bearing  of  the  evidence  on  the 
question  of  the  sources  of  the  nitrogen  of  the  Leguminosje ;  and  here 
we  approach  not  only  the  most  important  but  the  most  difficult  part 
of  our  subject. 


42 


The  first  of  the  leguminous  crops,  the  yield  of  nitrogen  in  which 
is  recorded  in  Table  I,  is  beans.  Without  manure  the  yield  of  nitrogen 
was  in  the  earlier  years  very  much  higher  than  with  the  cereals ;  but 
the  decline  was  very  great,  and  in  the  later  years  it  was  as  low  as 
with  the  cereals.  With  mixed  mineral  manure,  including  potash,  the 
yield  throughout  was  much  higher,  but  the  decline  was,  as  without 
manure,  very  great.  We  have  not  a  sufficiently  comparative  series  of 
determinations  of  nitrogen  in  the  soils  of  the  bean  plots,  but  such 
results  as  are  at  command  lead  to  the  conclusion  that  there  has  been 
a  gradual  decline  in  the  percentage  of  nitrogen  in  the  surface  soils ; 
but,  considering  the  little  tendency  of  the  plant  to  throw  out  feeding 
root  in  the  superficial  layers,  it  may  be  a  question  how  far  the  reduc- 
tion is  due  to  exhaustion  by  the  direct  action  of  growth,  or  how  far 
to  nitrification  and  passage  of  the  nitrates  downwards. 


Nitrogen  in  the  Soils  of  the  Experimental  Glover  Plots. 

The  most  important  of  the  leguminous  crops  to  which  reference 
has  been  made  is  red  clover.  In  Table  I  is  recorded  the  yield  of 
nitrogen  over  twenty-two  years,  1849-70,  in  only  six  of  which,  how- 
ever, was  any  crop  obtained.  The  experiment  has  '  een  continued, 
with  some  modifications  ;  and  in  1877,  that  is  after  twenty-nine  years, 
in  nine  of  the  last  ten  trials  the  plant  had  died  ofp  during  the  winter 
and  spring  succeeding  the  sowing  of  the  seed.  Several  small  crops 
have  since  been  obtained,  and  in  March,  1881,  samples  of  soil  were 
taken  from  five  places  where  no  nitrogenous  manure  has  been  applied 
from  the  commencement,  and  at  each  place  to  thi'ee  depths  of  9  inches 
each.  Exactly  corresponding  samples  were  also  taken  from  an  imme- 
diately adjoining  plot,  which  had  been  thirty  years  under  alternate 
wheat  and  fallow,  without  manure  of  any  kind.  The  nitrogen  was 
determined  in  each  of  the  five  separate  samples,  and  also  in  the  mix- 
ture of  the  five.     Table  XIII  summarises  the  results. 


43 


lich 
ygen 
but 
as 
the 
lout 
iS  of 
|mch 
3een 
loils ; 
[ding 
|duc- 
far 


I. 


Table  XIIL— Hoosfield  Clover,  and  Wheat  and  Fallow,  Land. 

Nitrogen  ;per  cent,  in  dry  Motdd,  first  9  inches. 

[Experiments  more  than  30  years.] 


Mean. 


Mean  of  determinations  on  five  separate  samples, 
Mean  on  the  mixture  of  the  five  samples 

Mean , 


1881. 


Clover  Land. 


Per  cent. 
0  -1007 
0  -1055 


0-1061 


Fallow  Land. 


Per  cent. 
0  0925 
0-0984 


0  -0955 


It  is  true  that  the  tendency  of  the  evidence  on  the  point  is  to  show 
that  red  clover  derives,  at  any  rate  much  of  its  nitrogen,  from  the 
lower  layers  of  the  soil ;  but  it  is  surely  significant  that,  after  the 
growth  of  heavy  crops  in  1849,  when  the  land  was  in  ordinary  condi- 
tion as  to  manuring  and  cropping,  and  the  constant  failure  since,  there 
is,  coincidently  with  this,  nearly  as  low  a  percentage  of  nitrogen  in  the 
surface  soil  as  with  alternate  wheat  and  fallow  without  manure.  It  is 
obvious  that  any  accumulation  near  the  surface,  due  to  residue  from 
the  small  crops,  has  been  more  than  compensated  by  exhaustion.  The 
evidence  afforded  by  the  figures  may  be  said  to  be  of  a  somewhat 
negative  character ;  but  it  is  at  any  rate  clear  that  failure  of  growth 
of  the  clover  has  been  associated  with  a  declining,  and  a  very  low, 
percentage  of  nitrogen  in  the  surface  soil. 

The  next  results  are  of  a  very  much  more  definite  character.  They 
relate  to  the  two  portions  of  the  field  which  had  grown  six  corn  crops 
in  succession  by  artificial  manures  alone,  was  then  divided  (in  1873), 
and  on  one  half  clover  (sown  in  the  previous  year),  and  on  the  other 
half  barley,  was  grown.  Table  I  shows  that  in  the  clover  crops 
151  "3  pounds,  and  in  the  barley  only  37"3  pounds  of  nitrogen  were 
removed.  Yet,  in  the  next  year  (1874),  barley  being  grown  over 
both  portions,  the  one  which  had  yielded  151-3  pounds  in  clover 
now  yielded  69*4  pounds  in  barley ;  and  the  other,  which  had  yielded 
only  37"3  in  barley,  now  yielded  only  39-1  pounds  in  barley. 

In  October,  1873,  after  the  clover  and  barley  had  been  removed, 
and  before  the  land  was  ploughed  up,  samples  of  the  soil  were  taken 
as  follows :  From  each  portion  four  separate  samples,  each  12  by  12 
inches  area  and  9  inches  deep,  and  the  nitrogen  was  determined  in 


44 


each  separate  sample,  and  also  in  an  equal  mixture  of  the  four.  Six 
other  samples,  each  6  by  G  by  9  inches,  were  also  taken  from  each  of 
the  two  portions,  and  the  six  samples  representing  each  portion  were 
mixed,  and  the  nitrogen  determined  in  the  mixture.  At  each  place 
corresponding  separate  samples  were  taken,  and  mixtures  made,  re- 
presenting respectively  the  second  and  the  third  9  inches  of  depth. 
In  all  cases  three  and  in  many  four  determinations  of  nitrogen  were 
made  on  each  sample.  The  following  table  gives  the  mean  results  on 
each  of  the  four  separate  samples,  the  mean  of  these,  the  mean  on  the 
mixture  of  the  four,  the  mean  on  the  mixture  of.  the  six,  and  the  mean 
of  all : — 

Table  XIV. 

Experimental  Clover  and  Barley  Land. 

[Nitrogen  per  cent,  in  dry  Mould,  first  9  inches.] 


Description  of  Samples. 

• 

1873. 

Clover  Land. 

Barley  Land. 

Samnle  No.  1  fl2  x  12  x  9  inches') 

Per  cent. 
0-1574 
0-1529 
0-1484 
0  1G31 

Per  cent. 
0-14G8 

Samole  No.  2  (12  x  12  x  9  inches) 

0-1341 

Sample  No.  3  (12  x  12  x  9  inches) 

0  1431 

Samnio  No.  4  (12  x  12  x  9  inches) 

0 • 1405 

Mean  on  the  four  separate  samples  (12  x  12  x  9  inches) 
Mean  on  a  mixture  of  the  four  samples  (12  x  12  x  9  ins.) 
Mean  on  a  mixture  of  six  samples  (G  x  G  x  9  inches) .... 

0  1554 
0  15G6 
0-1578 

0-1411 
0  -1387 
0-1450 

General  means 

0-15G6 

0-141G 

The  determinations  on  the  individual  samples  given  in  the  upper 
pr  tion  of  the  table  (XIV),  forcibly  illustrate  the  inapplicability  of 
results  obtained  on  single  samples  of  soil.  But  the  accordance  of 
the  mean  results  of  the  three  sets  of  determinations  for  the  clover 
land,  and  again  of  the  three  for  the  barley  land,  can  leave  no  doubt 
whatever  that  there  was  a  considerably  higher  percentage  of  nitrogen 
in  the  first  9  inches  of  the  clover  ground  than  to  the  same  depth  of 
the  barley  ground. 

The  results  must,  indeed,  be  accepted  as  indicating  a  marked  distinc- 
tion, which,  in  direction,  is  entirely  consistent  with  what  is  known  of 
the  influence  of  a  clover  crop  as  a  prepai'ation  for  a  succeeding  cereal 
one,  and  entirely  consistent  with  the  results  actually  obtained  with  the 
barley  succeeding  the  clover.      It   is,    however,  difficult,  to   suppose 


45 


that  the  figures  correctly  r  ^present,  in  degree,  the  average  difference 
in  the  composition  of  the  first  9  inches  of  the  two  plots ;  for,  calcu- 
lated per  acre,  the  excess  of  nitrogen  in  the  surface  soil  of  the  clover 
plot  would  represent  an  accumulation  equal  to  about  twice  as  much 
as  was  removed  in  the  three  cuttings  of  the  clover,  notwithstanding  all 
visible  vegetable  debris  was  removed  before  the  soils  were  submitted 
to  analysis  ;*  nor  have  the  subsequent  crops  benefited  as  much  as  might 
have  been  expected  from  such  an  amount  of  accumulation.  On  the 
othtir  hand,  samples  taken  in  1877  still  show  a  higher  percentage  of 
nitrogen  in  the  surface  soil  of  the  clover  than  of  the  barley  land. 

It  is,  at  any  rate,  obvious  that  the  surface  soil  of  the  clover  ground 
has  gained  nitrogen,  either  from  above  or  from  below — from  the 
atmosphere  or  from  the  subsoil.  And,  so  far  as  the  determinations  of 
nitrogen  in  the  subsoils  go,  the  indication  is  that,  if  from  below,  it  is 
at  least  mainly  from  a  lower  depth  than  27  inches. 

It  is  freely  admitted  that,  in  the  facts  of  this  experiment  as  they 
stand,  there  is  no  evidence  as  to  the  source  of  the  large  amount  of 
nitrogen  of  the  clover  crop,  and  of  the  increased  amount  of  it 
in  the  surface  soil.  In  the  absence  of  such  evidence,  it  is  natural 
enough  to  assume  that  the  atmosphere  has  been  the  source.  But 
whilst  there  is  absolutely  nothing  in  favour  of  this  view  excepting 
the  fact  that  an  explanation  is  needed,  and  that  if  that  source  were 
established  the  difficulty  would  be  solved,  there  is,  to  say  the  least, 
much  more  evidence  in  favour  of  the  supposition  that  the  subsoil  has 
been  the  source  of  at  any  rate  much  of  the  nitrogen. 


The  Soils  of  the  Melilotus  leucantha  and  White  Clover  Plots. 

Reference  has  already  been  made  to  the  enormous  growth  of 
Melilotus  leucantha,  and  the  enormous  amount  of  nitrogen  it  yielded, 
for  several  years  in  succession,  on  the  land  where  no  nitrogen  had 
been  applied  for  more  than  thirty  years,  and  where  red  clover  had  so 
frequently  failed  (p.  12).  The  crop  of  1882,  the  fifth  in  succession, 
was  the  highest,  and  the  yield  of  nitrogen  in  it  was  not  far  short  of 
150  pounds  per  acre ;  whilst,  under  exactly  similar  conditions,  ordi- 
nary red  and  white  clover  gave  very  small  produce.  Accordingly,  as 
soon  as  the  crops  were  removed,  samples  of  soil  were  taken  from  one 
of  the  melilotus  plots,  and  from  the  corresponding  white  clover  plot. 
Samples  were  taken  from  two  places  on  each  plot,  and  in  each  case  to 

*  This  was  more  completely  done  in  the  case  of  the  four  12x12x9  inch  samples, 
than  in  that  of  the  six  6  x  6  x  9  inch  ones,  and  the  latter  are  seen  to  give  slightly 
higher  percentages  of  nitrogen. 


46 

the  depth  of  six  times  9  inches,  or  in  all  54  inches.  The  examination 
of  these  samples  of  soil  is  as  yet  very  incomplete,  but  the  following 
interesting  facts  have  been  ascertained  : — 

Whilst  the  strong  roots  of  the  melilotus  were  found  to  penetrate 
to  the  lowest  depths  of  the  sampling,  there  was  very  little  develop- 
ment of  white  clover  roots  beyond  the  surface  soil.  Whilst  to  the 
eye,  and  to  the  hand,  the  subsoil  where  the  melilokis  had  grown  was 
obviously  pumped  dry,  and  was  somewhat  disintegrated,  to  the  full 
depth  sampled,  that  of  the  clover  plot  had  no  such  characters.  De- 
terminations of  moisture  in  the  soils  and  subsoils  show,  at  each  of  the 
six  depths,  much  less  water  in  the  melilotus  than  in  the  white  clover 
soils ;  and  the  difference  is  by  far  the  greater  in  the  lower  depths. 
Calculated  per  acre,  it  would  appear  that,  to  the  depth  of  54  inches, 
the  melilotus  soil  had  lost  approximately  540  tons  more  water  per 
acre  than  the  white  clover  soil ;  and  there  can  be  no  doubt  that  the 
pumping  action  had  extended  deeper  still. 

There  is  here,  then,  clear  evidence  that  the  plant,  whose  habit  of 
gi'owth,  and  especially  whose  range,  and  feeding  capacity,  of  root, 
suited  it  to  the  conditions,  was  enabled  to  take  up  much  more  water, 
and  doubtless  with  it  much  more  food,  than,  under  exactly  similar 
conditions  of  soil,  were  at  the  command  of  the  plant  of  the  much 
weaker  and  more  restricted  development. 

Nitrogen  as  Nitric  Acid  in  the  Melilotus  and  White  Clover  Soils. 

That  the  deep-rooting  melilotus  did  derive  more  nitrogen  from  the 
subsoil  than  the  shallow-rooting  white  clover  is  obvious  from  the 
following  facts : — Watery  exhausts  were  made  of  each  soil,  at 
each  depth,  and  the  nitrogen  as  nitric  acid  determined  in  them,  by 
Schlosing's  method,  as  nitric  oxide,  by  its  reaction  with  ferrous  salts. 

The  f oUowir     iable  summarises  the  results  : — 


■» 


ion 
ate 


47 

Table  XV. 
Nitrogen  as  Nitric  Acid. 


Per  million,  dry  Soil. 

Per  Acre. 

Melilotus 
Soil. 

White 
Clover  Soil. 

Melilotus 
Soil. 

White      T^.„ 
Clover  Sou.  difference. 

First  9  inches 

Second  9  inches 

Third  9  inches 

Fourth  9  inches 

Fifth  9  inches 

Sixth  9  inches 

1-28 
0-36 
0-21 
0-33 
0-28 
0  55 

3  24 
1-10 
0-66 
1-03 
146 
1-77 

lbs. 
3  39 
0-97 
0-61 
0-C9 
0-84 
1-65 

lbs. 
8  59 
2-97 
1-91 
3  09 
4-38 
5-31 

lbs. 

5  20 

2-00 

1-30 

210 

3-54 

3  66 

Total 

•  • 

•• 

8-45 

26  25 

17  -80 

Thus  the  melilotus  had  not  only  exhausted  the  water,  but  the  nitric 
acid  of  the  soil,  at  each  depth  very  much  more  than  the  white  clover 
had  done  ;  and  the  difference  is  very  marked,  and  increases,  at  the 
lower  depths.  It  is  seen  that  in  the  case  of  the  white  clover  soil  there 
is  a  diminishing  amount  of  nitric  acid  from  the  first  to  the  third  depth, 
and  then  an  increasing  quantity  to  the  sixth  depth.  There  was,  in 
fact,  about  the  same  total  amount  found  in  the  three  lower  as  in  the 
three  upper  layers.  It  may  fairly  be  supposed  that  there  is  greater 
concentration  lower  still,  and  that  the  exhausting  action  of  the  melilotua 
extended  beyond  the  depth  examined. 

There  is  here  direct  evidence  that  the  soil  is  the  source  of  at 
any  rate  some  of  the  excess  of  nitrogen  of  the  melilotus  over  that  in 
the  white  clover.  The  quantity,  and  the  distribution,  of  nitric  acid 
in  the  soil  at  any  one  time  are  so  dependent  on  temporary  conditions, 
that  it  would  be  fallacious  to  attempt  to  estimate  from  the  figures  as 
they  stand  the  exact  amount  which  the  melilotus  has  taken  up  more 
than  the  white  clover.  Then  it  is  obvious  that  the  action  extended 
below  the  depth  examined ;  and  it  is  a  question  whether,  with  the 
greater  disintegration,  and  greater  aeration,  nitrification  would  not  be 
favoured  in  the  lower  depths,  and  if  so  the  supply  would  be  in  a  sense 
cumulative.  Lastly,  it  may  be  that  the  deeply  and  widely  distributed 
m.elilotus  roots  have  the  capacity  of  taking  up  nitrogen  from  the  soil 
in  other  forms  than  as  nitric  acid. 


\*..J^ 


48 


i 


Nitrogen  as  Nitric  Acid  in  other  Soils  and  Subsoils. 

It  will  be  some  furtlicr  aid  in  judging  of  tho  possibility  or  pro- 
bability that  the  nitric  acid  in  the  soil  and  subsoil  may  be  an  adequate 
source  of  tho  nitrogen  of  the  LeguminoscB,  if  wo  quote  a  few  results 
indicating  the  amount  of  nitric  acid  found  in  some  other  soils  under 
known  conditions. 

In  the  first  place,  three  soil  drain-gauges,  one  with  20,  ono  with  40, 
and  one  with  GO  inches  depth  of  soil,  in  its  natural  state  of  consolida- 
tion, and  each  of  one-thousandth  of  an  acre  area,  have  been  under 
experiment  for  between  eleven  and  twelve  years.  No  manure  has  been 
applied  to  these  soils,  nor  have  they  gi'own  any  crop,  from  the  com- 
mencement. The  drainage  has  been  regularly  collected  and  measured ; 
and  for  nearly  the  whole  of  the  last  five  years  the  nitric  acid  has 
been  determined  in  monthly  average  samples  of  the  drainage  waters. 
Taking  the  result  of  the  three  gauges,  for  four  harvest-years  (Sep- 
tember 1,  1877,  to  August  31,  1881),  these  soils,  which  had  been 
about  six  years  without  any  manure  at  the  commencement  of  the 
period  under  consideration,  have  lost  by  drainage  an  average  of  nearly 
43  pounds  of  nitrogen  as  nitric  acid  per  acre  per  annum,  of  which 
perhaps  not  much  more  than  5  pounds  would  be  duo  to  rain  and  con- 
densation of  combined  nitrogen  from  the  atmosphere.  In  fact,  about 
35  pounds,  or  perhaps  more,  would  appear  to  have  been  annually  due 
to  the  nitrification  of  the  nitrogenous  matter  of  these  unmanured  soils. 
It  has  to  be  borne  in  mind,  however,  that  tho  blocks  of  soil  having 
access  of  air  from  below  as  well  as  from  above,  the  nitrification  may 
have  been  freer  than  it  would  be  in  soil  in  its  ordinary  condition. 

Again,  in  some  of  the  samples  of  soil  taken  from  the  plots  in  the 
experimental  wheat  field,  in  October  18G5,  and  in  many  of  those  taken 
in  October  1881,  that  is  in  each  case  about  two  months  after  the 
removal  of  the  crop,  the  nitric  acid  has  been  determined. 

In  the  case  of  one  plot  sampled  in  18G5,  which  had  received 
annually  mixed  mineral  manure  and  ammonium  salts,  determinations 
made  in  186G  (by  Br.  Pugli's  method),  showed  nearly  76  pounds  of 
nitrogen  as  nitric  acid  per  acre  to  tho  depth  of  27  inches.  As,  how- 
ever, these  soils  had  been  stored  in  a  rather  moist  condition,  it  is 
possible  that  nitrification  may  have  taken  place  after  the  collection, 
and  that  the  results  are  so  far  somewhat  too  high. 

The  following  table  (XVl)  gives  an  abstract  of  the  results  of  the 
determinations  of  nitrogen  as  nitric  acid  in  the  1881  samples  of  the 
experimental  wheat  field  soils : — 


\'WW^ 


49 

Taiu-e  XVT. 

NUror/en  as  Nitric  Acid. 


Complex  Mineral  Manure 


and 

Ammonium 

Salts. 


and 
Sodium 
Nitrate. 


Sodium 

Kitrate 

alone. 


Unmanured 
continuously. 


Per  Million  Dry  Soil. 


Per  Acre. 


"Pirsf.  P  inrlifia 

lbs. 
22-8 
11-3 
5-8 

lbs. 
19-7 
10-0 

8-3 

lbs. 
16  3 
20  1 
18-0 

lbs. 
9-7 

Second  9  inches   

Third  9  inches 

5-2 

2-8 

Total 

39-9 

38-0 

54-4 

17-7 

Thus,  in  these  1881  samples,  collected,  like  those  in  18G5,  about 
two  months  after  the  removal  of  the  crops,  the  amounts  of  nitric  acid 
found  to  the  depth  of  27  inches  only,  represented — in  the  soil  of  the 
plot  receiving  mixed  mineral  manure  and  ammonium  salts,  39"9 
pounds  of  nitrogen  per  acre  to  that  depth ;  in  that  of  the  plot  receiving 
the  same  mineral  manure  and  sodium  nitmte,  38  pounds ;  in  that  of 
the  plot  to  which  nitrate  of  soda  alone  is  annually  applied,  54-4  pounds; 
and  in  the  soil  of  the  continuously  unmanured  plot,  177  pounds. 

As  in  the  case  of  the  white  clover  land,  in  all  cases  (except  with  the 
nitrate  alone),  the  amount  decreased  from  the  first  to  the  third  9  inches 
of  depth  from  the  surface  ;  and  if,  as  in  that  case,  it  increased  in  the 
lower  depths,  and  in  anything  like  the  same  degree,  we  have  evidence 
of  a  considerable  store  of  nitric  acid  available  for  such  plants  as,  by 
virtue  of  their  habit  of  growth,  are  able  to  gather  up  the  residue 
accumulated  within  the  subsoil. 

Determinations  made  in  samples  collected  in  the  experimental  rots,- 
tion  field,  in  September  1878,  showed  the  following  amounts  of 
nitrogen  as  nitric  acid  per  acre  to  the  depth  of  18  inches    - 


iii# 


50 


With  Super- 
phosphate 
only.* 

With 

Complex 

Mineral  and 

Nitrogenous 

Manure.* 

After  fallow 

lbs. 
30-3 
10 -G 

lbs. 
48-8 

After  beana    

20-5 

Difference  ■ .  . > 

25-7 

28-3 

Samples  collected  at  the  same  date  from  the  unmanured  alternate 
wheat  and  fallow  plots  showed  to  the  same  depth : — 

lbs. 

After  fallow 33-7 

After  wheat 2  G 

Diifercnce    31  '1 

Lastly,  two  fields  which  had  been  manured  and  cropped  in  the 

ordinary  course  of  the  farm,  and  had  been  fallowed  since  the  previous 

autumn,  showed,  according  to  determinations  in  samples  collected  in 

October  1881,  the  following  amounts  of  nitrogen  as  nitric  acid  per 

acre  to  the  depth  of  27  inches : — 

lbs. 

Claycroft  field 58-8 

Foster's  field    5G  '5 

Thus  there  was  very  much  less  nitrogen  as  nitric  acid  found  in  the 
soils  to  the  depths  examined,  after  the  growth  of  the  leguminous  crop 
beans,  as  well  '^er  that  of  the  gramineous  crop  wheat,  than  in  the 
correspond'  .w   soils;    indicating,   therefore,    a   like   source   of 

some,  r '  .  jc;,  of  the  nitrogen  of  both  crops. 

It  oe   seen,  however,  that   even   in  the   cases   of   the   soils 

receiving  nitrogenous  manure,  the  amuunt  of  nitric  acid  found  to  the 
depths  examined,  is  very  far  from  sufficient  to  account  for  so  large 
an  accumulation  in  the  crop,  and  in  the  surface  soil,  as  the  figures 
relating  to  the  nitrogen  in  the  produce  of  the  clover,  and  in  the  clover 
and  barley  soils,  would  indicate  had  been  accumulated. 

The  amounts  of  nitric  acid  formed,  or  remaining,  within  a  limited 
depth  from  the  surface,  at  any  one  time,  is,  it  is  true,  as  already 
intimated,  dependent  on  so  many  temporary  circumstances,  that  it  is 

*  The  manures  are  applied  every  fourth  year,  for  the  root-crop  commencing 
each  course  of — roots,  bp-  ^ey,  leguminous  crop  or  fallow,  and  wheat. 


51 


IX 

and 

0U8 

* 


not  to  be  expected  that  tlio  amount  found  within  such  limits  at  any 
given  time  would  represent  more  than  a  fraction  of  that  which  would 
be  available,  even  within  that  range,  during  the  long  period  of  growth 
of  the  clover  crop.  Then,  the  indications  are  that  there  is  considerable 
accumulation  beyond  the  depth  to  which  most  of  our  examinations 
apply.  Still,  it  is  difficult  to  suppose,  with  the  evidence  at  command, 
that  the  whole  of  ^he  nitrogen  which  has  to  be  accounted  for,  either 
in  the  Melilotus,  or  in  the  clover  and  barley  experiment,  can  be 
attributed  to  that  source.  There  remains  the  question  whether  the 
roots  of  the  plant  do  not  take  up  nitrogen  from  the  soil  in  other 
states  than  as  nitric  acid. 

Finally  in  regard  to  the  experiments  with  clover  and  barley,  it  is 
admitted  that  the  various  results  of  soil  examinations  which  have 
been  adduced  do  not  conclusively  show  the  source  of  the  whole  of 
the  nitrogen  to  have  been  the  soil.  It  will,  we  think,  nevertheless 
be  granted,  that  they  do  clearly  point  to  the  fact  that  at  any  rate 
much  of  it  is  derived  from  that  source ;  whilst  there  is  no  evidence 
whatever  of  an  atmospheric  source  of  more  than  the  small  amount  of 
combined  nitrogen  coming  down  in  rain,  and  the  minor  aqueous 
deposits,  and  the  probably  still  smaller  amount  absorbed  from  the 
atmosphere  by  the  porous  soil. 


Nitrogen  in  some  of  the  Soils  of  the  Ex;periviental  Mixed  Herbage  Plots. 

The  results  next  to  be  referred  to  will  afford  additional  evidence  of 
the  soil-source  of  the  nitrogen  of  the  Logurainosaj. 

In  Table  III  it  was  shown  that  in  the  mixed  herbage  of  permanent 
grass  land,  without  manure  33'0  pounds,  and  with  a  purely  mineral 
manure  (including  potash)  55-6  pounds  of  nitrogen  were  yielded  per 
acre  per  annum  in  the  crop  over  a  period  of  twenty  years.  Whence 
comes  the  22*6  pounds  more  nitrogen  per  acre  per  annum  taken  up 
when  the  mineral  manure  was  applied  than  without  manure  ? 

After  twenty  years  of  continuous  experiment,  samples  of  soil 
were  taken  from  three  places  on  each  plot,  and  in  each  case  to  the 
depth  of  six  times  9  inches,  or  54  inches.  The  mean  results  of  the 
determinations  of  nitrogen  in  the  surface  soils  of  the  unmanured 
plot,  and  of  the  plot  receiving  a  complex  mineral  manure  (including 
potash),  are  given  in  Table  XVII  which  follows :— 


m-m 


52 

Table  XVII. — Experiments  on  Permanent  Meadow  Land. 
Nitrogen,  per  cent,  in  dry  Mould,  and  per  Acre. 


1870. 

187G. 

1878. 

Plot  3. — Unmanured - 

Per  cent. 
0  2517 

•  • 

•  f 

•  • 

•  • 

Per  cent. 
0  -2466 
0'223G 

Plot  7. — Mixed  mineral 

manure,  including  potash 

0  -2246 

Difference 

0  0230 

lbs. 

506-0 

25-3 

Difference  per  acre 

r  Total  20  yeai^ 

\  Average  per  annum 

•  t 

•  • 

Although  we  have  not  previously  quoted  the  figures,  we  have  on 
several  occasions  stated  in  general  terms  that  determinations  of  nitro- 
gen show  a  lower  amount  in  the  mineral-manured  soil,  approximately 
corresponding  to  the  increased  yield  in  the  crop. 

It  is  in  reference  to  our  statements  on  this  point  that  M.  Joulie  has 
called  in  question  +he  possibility  of  obtaining  results  of  the  kind  appli- 
cable to  our  argument.  He  takes  the  fact  of  the  increased  yield  of 
nitrogen  under  the  influence  of  purely  mineral  manure  as  conclusive 
proof  of  the  atmospheric  source  of  the  increased  amount  of  nitrogen 
assimilated.  He  assumes  that  our  calculations  are  based  on  determi- 
nations of  nitrogen  in  a  sample  of  the  mixed  soil  to  the  total  depth  of 
54  inches.  He  calculates  that  in  the  mass  of  soil  to  that  depth  the 
difference  in  the  amount  in  the  two  cases  would  be  far  too  small 
to  furnish  a  justitication  for  the  important  conclusion  that  the  soil 
was  the  source  of  the  nitrogen.  He  objects  that  the  roots  of  such 
herbage  would  derive  their  nutriment  chiefly  in  the  superficial  layers. 
He  further  objects  that  if  the  diflerence  we  assume  were  a  fact,  it  is 
probably  due  to  an  accidental  difference  in  the  soil  of  the  two  plots, 
such  a  difference  having  been  admitted  by  us  in  the  case  of  another 
plot.  Lastly,  he  suggests  that  if  there  really  were  the  reduction  we 
suppose,  it  might  be  due  to  other  causes — such  as  increased  activity 
of  nitrification  under  the  influence  of  the  mineral  manure  and  passage 
of  the  nitrates  downwards. 

In  the  first  place,  in  the  case  of  the  irregularity  in  the  condition 
of  one  of  the  plots  referred  to,  the  difference  was  readily  seen  in  the 
section  of  the  soil,  and  there  was  no  such  difference  in  the  instance 
now  under  consideratior. 

Then  it  is  the  determination  of  nitrogen  in  the  first  9  inches  of  soil 


M 


53 


alone,  to  which  we  have  hitherto  referred,  and  to  which  we  confine 
attention  on  the  present  occasion. 

In  the  nex<-  place,  that  the  difference  in  the  condition  of  the  two 
plots  is  not  merely  local  is  shown  by  the  fact  that  the  determinations 
on  a  sample  from  the  unmanured  plot  taken  in  1870  entirely  confirm 
the  relative  composition  shown  Ly  the  samples  of  1876.  Again,  the 
lower  percentage  of  nitrogen  in  the  1876  samples  of  the  mineral 
manured  plot  is  entirely  confirmed  by  the  results  obtained  on  samples 
taken  in  1878.  Further,  of  the  twenty  experimental  plots,  there  is 
only  one  other  showing  so  low  a  percentage  as  the  mineral-manured 
plot,  and  that  is  the  one  which  had  received  the  same  mineral  manure, 
but  for  a  shorter  series  of  years. 

We  have  in  fact  no  doubt  whatever  that  the  differences  indicated  by 
the  figures  are  real,  and  dependent  on  the  conditions  of  manuring  and 
of  growth.  The  reduction  is,  moreover,  very  great,  amounting  to 
nearly  one-tenth  of  the  total  quantity  of  nitrogen,  and  far  beyond 
the  limits  of  accidental  difference  in  the  sampling  or  the  analysis. 

Calculated  per  acre,  the  sui'face  soil  of  the  mineral-manured  plot 
contained,  at  the  end  of  the  twenty  years,  50G  pounds  less  nitrogen  than 
the  soil  oi  the  unmanured  plot  to  the  same  depth,  corresponding  to  an 
annual  reduction  of  25"3  pounds  of  nitrogen  per  acre  per  annum.  It 
is,  to  say  the  least,  a  very  remarkable  coincidence  that  the  in'^reased 
yield  of  nitrogen  in  the  crop  on  the  mineral-manured  plot  which  has 
to  be  accounted  for  is  22'6  pounds  per  acre  per  annum. 

We  do  not  pretend  to  claim  absolute  accuracy  for  such  results,  but 
we  ourselves  entertain  no  doubt  whatever  of  their  significance  and 
their  importance. 

It  will  be  asked — How  is  it  that  in  the  case  of  the  red  clover,  and 
the  melilotus,  it  was  concluded  that,  so  far  as  the  plants  had  derived 
their  nitrogen  from  the  soil,  it  was  at  any  rate  mainly  from  the  lower 
depths,  and  that  here,  in  the  case  of  the  permanent  mixed  herbage 
plots,  we  assume  the  increased  yield  of  nitrogen  to  be  derived  from 
the  surface  soil  ? 

Under  the  influence  of  the  mineral  manure,  a  larger  proportion 
and  amount  of  leguminous  herbage  was  developed  than  on  any  other 
p,ot ;  but  the  leguminous  plant  the  most,  indeed  very  prominently, 
favoured  was  the  Lathyrns  p-atensis,  which  throws  out  an  enormous 
quantity  of  root  near  the  surface ;  and  it  is  sufficiently  established 
that  the  potash  of  artificial  manures  remains  almost  exclusively  in  the 
superficial  layers.  On  the  other  hand,  the  perennial  red  clover,  and 
the  Lotus  corniculatus,  which  have  a  much  more  deeply-rooting  ten- 
dency, are  comparatively  little  encouraged. 

D  2      ' 


I! 


54 

The  actual  amount  of  leguminous  herbage  produced,  however,  is 
not  sufficient  to  account  for  nearly  the  whole  of  the  increased  yield 
of  nitrogen  in  the  produce  of  the  plot.  The  fact  is  that,  besides  a 
porportionally  very  large  increase  in  the  growth  of  leguminous  her- 
bage, there  has  been  a  gradually  increasing  amount  of  gramineous 
produce  developed ;  far  beyond  what  would  be  anticipated  from  the 
extremely  limited  effect  of  such  manures  on  gramineous  crops  grown 
separately  on  arable  land.  How  far  this  result  may  be  due  to  an 
increased  tendency  of  the  grasses  to  form  stem,  and  to  ripen,  under 
such  conditions ; — how  far  to  more  active  nitriBcation  induced  under 
the  influence  of  the  mineral  manure  in  the  much  more  highly  nitro- 
genous gi'ass-land  than  in  the  poorer  arable  soil,  and  so  yielding  a 
direct  supply  to  the  Gi-amineoe  of  the  mixed  herbage  ; — or  how  far  to 
an  increased  supply  in  a  condition  available  for  the  grasses  as  the 
result  of  a  previously  increased  growth  of  the  Legumiuosse,  may  be 
a  question.  But  it  is  of  interest  to  note  that  the  gramineous  species 
that  are  developed  are  among  the  most  superficially  rooting  of  the 
grasses  found  on  the  experimental  plots. 

Before  leaving  the  subject  of  these  experiments  on  the  mixed 
herbage  of  grass  land,  it  may  be  well  to  call  attention  to  the  fact  that, 
on  the  assumption  that  the  whole  of  the  nitrogen  of  the  herbage, 
beyond  the  small  amount  of  already  combined  nitrogen  coTjtributed  by 
rain  and  condensation  from  the  atraosphe*"e,  is  derived  from  the  soil, 
we  have  to  conclude  that  about  25  pounds  per  acre  per  annum  have 
been  yielded  by  the  soil  of  the  unmanured  plot,  and  nearly  an  addi- 
tional 25  pounds,  or  in  all  about  50  pounds,  from  the  mineral- 
manured  plot.  It  was  estimated  that,  in  the  case  of  the  continuous 
wheat  experiments,  about  20  pounds  of  nitrogen  had  been  annually 
obtained  in  the  crop,  and  a  minimum  of  12  pounds  lost  by  drainage ; 
in  all  32  pounds.  It  cannot  fail  to  be  observed  how  closely  this 
amount  corresponds  with  the  annual  yield  of  nitrogen  (83  pounds)  in 
the  unmanured  mixed  herbage.  With  the  richer  grass-land,  tliough  less 
aerated  than  arable  land,  it  might  be  expected  there  would  be  some 
increased  activity  of  nitrification,  even  in  the  unmanured  soil ;  and 
there  may  be  some  loss  by  drainage.  But,  with  a  mixed  herbage  of 
some  50  species,  of  very  varying  habit  of  growth,  and  with  the 
possession  of  the  soil  all  the  year  round,  it  is  only  what  would  be 
expected  that  there  would  be  more  of  the  available  nitrogen  taken  up 
by  the  crop,  and  less  lost  by  drainage,  than  with  the  cereal  grown  sepa- 
rately on  arable  land,  and  occupying  the  soil  for  only  a  very  limited 
period  of  the  year. 

We  conclude,  then,  that  the  results  relating  to  the  two  mixed 


a 
3r- 
us 
he 
wn 
an 
er 
er 
fro- 

a 


I 


55 

herbage  plots  can  leave  little  doubt  that  the  increased  yield  of  nitro- 
gen in  the  more  highly  leguminous  produce  of  the  mineral-manured 
plot  had  its  source  in  the  stores  of  the  soil  itself. 

Source  of  the  Nitrogen  of  Glover  Grown  on  Rich  Garden  Soil. 

We  have  one  more  illustration  to  bring  forward  having  an  import- 
ant  bearing  on  the  question  of  the  sources  of  the  nitrogen  of  the 
Leguminosee. 

In  view  of  the  signal  failure  in  the  attempts  to  grow  red  clover  on 
a  nitrogen  exhausted  arable  soil,  it  is  of  much  interest  that  large, 
though  declining,  crops  have  been  grown  for  twenty-nine  years  in 
succession  on  a  small  plot  of  rich  kitchen- garden  soil. 

The  experiment  was  commenced  in  1854,  and  the  following  table 
shows  the  percentage  of  nitrogen  in  samples  of  the  first  9  inches  of 
soil,  taken  in  October  1857,  and  in  IMay  1879 ;  that  is,  with  an 
interval  of  twenty-one  seasons  of  growth.  In  1857  only  one  sample 
was  taken,  and  only  to  the  depth  of  9  inches ;  but  in  1879  three 
samples  were  taken,  in  each  case  to  the  depth  of  twice  9,  or  18  inches. 
The  results  given  in  the  table  relate  to  the  first  9  inches  of  depth 
only : — 

Table  XVIII. — Clover  Grown  on  Kitchen  Garden  Soil. 
Nitrogen,  per  cent,  in  dry  Mould,  and  per  Acre. 


1857. 

1879. 

Difference. 

Per  cent. 

Per  cent. 
0-3C35 
0  -3610 
0 -3026 

Per  cent. 

0-5095 

0-3G3i 

0  1461 

"Ppi*  nr»iv>    tnfjil*                               ........••■'<••«  •• 

lbs. 
9,528 

lbs. 
6,790 

lbs. 
2,732 

130 

The  percentage  of  nitrogen  given  for  the  single  sample  collected  in 
October  1857,  is  the  mean  of  determinations  made  in  1857,  1866,  and 

*  In  the  original  paper,  too  high  an  average  weight  of  soil  per  acre  was  adopted, 
and  hence  the  amounts  of  nitrogen  per  acre  were  estimated  to  be  higher  than  now 
given  ;  but  the  difference  was  only  9  pounds  more  (139)  than  according  to  the 
new  calculation. 


i;'W 


If 
1 


^1 


if 

i  >.: 


56 


1880,  and  is  almost  ideutical  with  the  mean  of  those  made  at  the  latest 
date. 

The  first  point  to  observe  is  that  the  first  9  inches  of  the  garden 
ground  contained  more  than  half  a  per  cent,  of  nitrogen,  nearly  four 
times  as  much  as  the  average  of  the  arable  soils,  and  nearly  five  times 
as  much  as  the  exhausted  clover  land  soil.  It  is  of  course  true  that 
the  soil  would  be  correspondingly  rich  in  all  other  constituents ;  but 
some  portions  of  the  arable  soil  where  clover  failed,  had  received 
much  more  of  mineral  constituents  by  manure  than  had  been  removed 
in  the  crops. 

The  means  of  the  determinations  made  on  the  three  separate 
samples  taken  in  1879  are  seen  to  agree  very  well,  and  the  results  can 
leave  no  doubt  that  there  has  been  a  great  reduction  in  the  stock  of 
nitrogen  in  the  surface  soil.  The  reduction  amounts  to  nearly  29  per 
cent,  of  the  total.  Reckoned  per  acre,  as  shown  at  the  foot  of  the 
table,  it  corresponds  to  a  loss  of  2,732  pounds  during  the  twenty-one 
seasons  of  growth  ;  and  although  really  good  crops  are  still  grown  in 
mo.st  years,  there  has  been,  with  this  great  reduction  of  the  stock  of 
nitrogen  in  the  soil,  a  very  marked  reduction  in  the  clover-growing 
capability  of  the  soil.  Thus,  during  the  first  fourteen  of  the  twenty- 
nine  years  of  the  experiment,  seed  was  sown  only  three  times ;  whilst 
during  the  last  fifteen  years  it  has  been  necessary  to  sow  ten  times.  It 
is  obvious,  therefore,  that  the  plant  stood  very  much  longer  during 
the  earlier  than  the  later  years.  Then,  again,  the  produce  from  the 
three  sowings  during  the  first  fourteen  years  was  nearly  twice  as 
much  as  has  been  obtained  since. 

The  question  obviously  arises — what  relation  does  the  amount  of 
nitrogen  lost  by  the  soil  bear  to  the  amount  taken  off  in  the  crops  ? 
We  quite  admit  the  uncertainty  of  calculations  of  produce  per  acre 
from  the  results  obtained  on  a  few  square  yards.  We  are,  however, 
disposed  to  estimate  the  average  yield  of  nitrogen  over  the  twenty-one 
years  between  the  two  periods  of  soil  sampling  at  about  200  pounds 
per  acre  per  annum.  The  table  shows  that  against  this  we  have  an 
estimated  loss  of  nitrogen  by  the  first  9  inches  of  soil  of  130  pounds 
per  acre  per  annum,  corresponding  approximately  to  two-thirds  of 
the  amount  estimated  in  the  crop. 

There  is,  however,  evidence  leading  to  the  conclusion  that,  in  the 
case  of  arable  soils  to  which  excessive  amounts  of  farm-yard  manuro 
are  applied,  there  may  be  a  loss  by  evolution  as  free  li-^rogen ;  and, 
obviously,  so  far  as  this  may  have  occurred  in  the  garden  soil,  there 
will  be  the  less  of  the  loss  determined  in  the  surface  soil  to  be  credited 
to  assimilation  by  the  growing  clover. 


57 

On  the  other  hand,  it  is  known  that  when  growing  on  ordinary 
arable  soil,  the  clover  plant  throws  out  a  large  amount  of  roots  in  the 
lower  layers,  and  although  in  the  case  of  so  rich  a  surface  soil,  the 
plant  may  derive  a  larger  proportion  of  its  nutriment  from  that 
source,  we  must  at  the  same  time  suppose  that  it  has  also  availed 
itself  of  the  resources  of  the  subsoil.  Unfortunately,  we  did  not 
sample  deeper  than  9  inches  in  1857,  so  that  we  can  make  no  com- 
parison of  the  condition  of  the  subsoil  at  the  two  periods.  It  may, 
however,  be  observed  that,  in  1879,  the  second  9  inches  showed  about 
three  times  as  high  a  percentage  as  the  subsoils  of  the  arable  fields  at 
the  same  depth ;  indeed,  not  far  from  twice  as  high  a  percentage  as 
several  of  the  exhausted  arable  surface  soils.  It  cannot  be  doubted, 
therefore,  that  the  subsoil  of  the  garden  plot  has  contributed  to  the 
yield  of  nitrogen  in  the  crop. 

If,  then,  we  have  not  here  absolute  proof  that  the  source  of  the 
whole  of  the  nitrogen  of  the  clover  growing  on  the  garden  soil  was 
the  soil  itself,  we  have  surely  very  strong  grounds  for  concluding  that 
much,  and  perhaps  the  whole  of  it,  has  been  so  derived. 


General  Conclusions. 

After  this  review  of  the  evidence  which  the  determinations  of 
nitrogen  in  the  soils  of  our  experimental  plots  afford,  we  end,  as  we 
began,  by  saying  that,  although  we  admit  the  facts  of  production  are 
not  yet  conclusively  explained,  we  maintain  that  there  is,  to  say  the 
least,  much  more  of  direct  experimental  proof  of  the  soil  than  of  the 
atmospheric  source  of  the  nitrogen.  Moreover,  we  submit  that  this 
rnay  be  said,  not  only  c .  the  source  of  the  nitrogen  of  the  cereals,  but 
also  of  that  of  the  root-crops,  and  of  the  Leguminosse. 

If,  on  the  other  hand,  the  atmosphere  is  the  main,  if  not  the  ex- 
clusive, source  of  the  nitrogen  of  the  Leguminosoe,  we  would  ask  here, 
as  we  have  asked  elsewhere — why  those  leguminous  crops  which  take 
up  the  most  nitrogen  can  be  less  frequently  grown  on  the  same  soil  ? 
Why  we  entirely  failed  to  grow  clover  successively  on  ordinary  arable 
land,  which  was  nevertheless  in  a  condition  to  yield  fairly  good  cereal 
crops  ?  Why  the  only  condition  under  which  we  have  been  able  to 
grow  clover  continuously  was  where  the  soil  was  very  much  richer  in 
nitrogen  (and  of  course  in  other  constituents  also)  than  the  arable 
land  ?  And  lastly,  why  its  growth  under  such  circumstances  has  been 
accompanied  by  a  rapid  diminution  in  the  amount  of  nitrogen  in  the 
soil,  and  with  this  a  marked  decline  in  the  produce  ? 

It  will  not  for  a  moment  be  supposed  that  because  in  the  foregoing 


illustrations  and  arguments  we  have  confined  attention  almost  ex- 
clusively to  the  nitrogen  in  the  soils,  we  in  any  way  ignore  the 
importance  of  a  liberal  available  supply  of  the  mineral  constituents, 
so  essential  for  the  effective  action  of  the  nitrogen.  There  is  abundant 
evidence,  however,  that  the  failures  that  have  been  cited  have  not 
been  due  to  a  deficiency  of  mineral  constituents. 

If,  then,  the  supply  of  mineral  constituents  not  being  defective, 
the  yield  of  our  crops  is  in  the  main  dependent  on  the  amount  of 
nitrogen  which  is  available  to  them  within  th„  period  of  their  growth 
from  the  soil  itself,  or  from  manure  applied  to  it,  surely  the  fertility  of 
a  soil  must  be  largely  measured  by  the  amount  of  nitrogen  it  contains, 
and  the  degree  in  which  it  becomes  available.  And,  if  this  be  so,  is 
not  the  soil  a  *'  mine,"  as  well  as  a  laboratory  ? 

In  this  connection,  speaking  here  in  America,  it  will  not  be  in- 
appropriate to  conclude  with  a  brief  reference,  such  as  the  limited 
data  at  our  command  will  permit,  to  what  we  believe  must  be  a  cha- 
racteristic difference  between  a  large  proportion  of  the  comparatively 
recently,  or  even  not  yet,  broken  up  soils  of  this  continent,  and  those 
which  have  been  long  under  arable  culture  on  the  other  side  of  the 
Atlantic. 

A  sample  of  Illinois  Prairie  soil,  obtained  some  years  ago  by  Mr. 
(now  Sir)  James  Caird,  and  submitted  by  him  for  analysis  to  Dr. 
Voelcker,  to  whom  we  are  indebted,  not  only  for  his  own  analytical 
results,  but  also  for  a  sample  of  the  soil  itself,  shows,  by  almost 
identical  results  in  the  two  laboratories,  very  nearly  0*25  per  cent,  of 
nitrogen.  We  have  no  special  history  of  this  soil,  nor  do  we  1  low 
the  depth  to  which  it  was  taken ;  but  Dr.  Voelcker  informs  us  that 
the  sample  supplied  to  us  was  a  mixture  of  both  soil  and  subsoil  as 
supplied  to  him,  and  that  in  the  separate  surface  soil  he  found  0"33 
per  cent,  of  nitrogen. 

During  the  present  year  (1882),  between  forty  and  fifty  samples  of 
soil  from  the  North-west  Territory,  taken  at  intervals  between  Win- 
nipeg and  the  Rocky  Mountains,  were  sent  over  to  the  High  Com- 
missioner in  London,  and  exhibited  at  the  recent  show  of  the  Royal 
Agricultural  Society  of  England,  at  Reading.  The  soils  were  exhi- 
bited in  glass  tubes  four  feet  in  length,  and  are  stated  to  represent 
the  core  of  soil  and  subsoil  to  that  depth.  Three  samples  of  the 
surface  soils  have  kindly  been  supplied  to  us  for  the  determination 
of  the  nitrogen  in  them  : — 

No.  1  is  from  Portage  le  Prairie,  about  60  miles  from  Winnipeg, 
and  has  probably  been  under  cultivation  for  several  years.  The  dry 
mould  contained  0"2471  per  cent,  of  nitrogen. 


^MEm' 


59 


No.  2  is  from  the  Saskatchewan  district,  about  140  miles  from 
Winnipeg,  and  has  probably  been  under  cultivation  a  shorter  time 
than  Wo.  1.     The  dry  mould  contained  0'3027  per  cent,  of  nitrogen. 

No.  3  is  from  a  spot  about  40  miles  from  Fort  Ellis,  and  may  be 
considered  a  virgin  soil.  The  dry  mould  contained  0'2500  per  cent,  of 
nitrogen. 

In  general  terms  it  may  be  said  that  these  Illinois  and  North-west 
Territory  Prairie  soils  are  about  twice  as  rich  in  nitrogen  as  the  average 
of  the  Rothamsted  arable  surface  soils ;  and,  so  far  as  can  be  judged, 
they  are  probably  about  twice  as  rich  as  the  average  of  arable  soils 
in  Great  Britain.  They  indeed  correspond  in  their  amount  of  nitrogen 
very  closely  with  the  surface  soils  of  our  permanent  pasture  land.  As 
their  nitrogen  has  its  source  in  the  accumulation  from  ages  of  natural 
vegetation,  with  little  or  no  removal,  it  is  to  be  supposed  that,  as  a 
rule,  there  will  not  be  a  relative  deficiency  of  the  necessary  mineral 
constituents.*  Surely,  then,  these  new  soils  are  "  mines  "  as  well  as 
laboi-atories  ?     If  not,  what  is  the  meaning  of  the  term  a  fertile  soil  ? 

Assuming  these  soils  not  to  be  deficient  in  the  necessary  mineral 
supplies,  and  that  they  yield  up  annually  in  an  available  condition  an 
amount  of  nitrogen  at  all  corresponding  to  their  richness  in  that  con- 
stituent, it  may  be  asked — whether  they  should  not  yield  a  higher 
average  produce  of  wheat  per  acre  than  they  are  reported  to  do  ? 

The  exhausted  experimental  wheat  field  at  Rothamsted,  the  sur- 
face soil  of  which  at  the  commencement  of  the  experiments  thirty- 
nine  years  ago  probably  contained  only  about  half  as  high  a  percentage 
of  nitrogen  as  the  average  of  these  four  American  soils,  yielded  over 
the  first  eight  years  17|;  over  the  next  fifteen  years,  15| ;  over  the 
last  fifteen  years  (including  several  very  bad  seasons),  only  11]| 
bushels ;  and  over  the  whole  thirty-eight  years  about  14  bushels  per 
acre  per  annum. 

So  far  as  we  are  informed,  the  comparatively  low  average  yield 
of  the  rich  North-west  soils  is  partly  due  to  vicissitudes  of  climate, 
partly  to  defective  cultivation,  but  partly,  also,  to  the  luxuriant 
growth  of  weeds,  which  neither  the  time  at  command  for  cultivation, 
nor  the  amount  of  labour  available,  render  it  easy  to  keep  down. 
Then,  again,  in  some  cases,  the  straw  of  the  grain  crops  is  burnt,  and 
manure  is  not  retu  ned  to  the  land.    Still,  if  there  be  any  truth  in  the 

*  Since  the  above  was  in  type,  we  have  seen  Dr.  Voelcker's  report  on  the  Illinois 
Prairie  soil  above  referred  to,  and  find  he  caUed  attention  to  its  richness  in  potash 
and  other  mineral  constituents.  He  also  called  attention  to  the  much  higher  per- 
centage of  nitrogen  in  it  than  in  the  soils  of  this  country  which  he  and  others  had 
analysed. 


60 


views  we  have  advocated,  it  would  seem  it  should  he  an  ohject  of 
consideration  to  lessen,  as  far  as  practicable,  the  waste  of  fertility  of 
these  now  rich  soils.  At  the  same  time  it  is  obvious  that,  with  laud 
cheap  and  labour  dear,  the  desirable  object  of  bringing  these  vast 
areas  under  profitable  cultivation  cannot  be  attained  without  some 
sacrifice  of  their  fertility  in  the  first  instance,  which  can  only  be 
lessened  as  population  increases. 


HAEBIBQir  AND  aONfl,  PEINTEE8  IN  OEDINABY  TO  HKB  MAJE8TT,  8T.  MAETIn'b  IAKB.