IMAGE EVALUATION
TEST TARGET (MT-3)
I
5/ >*■ '^
4Ko
^
z
^
1.0
i I.I
Uitll §15
ut Itt 12.2
2! 144 ■"
^ us. 12.0
L25 11.4 il.6
/:
O
/
^
I
o^
CIHM/ICMH
Microfiche
Series.
CIHM/ICMH
Collection de
microfiches.
Canadian Institute for Historical ISAicroreproductions Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques
1980
Technical Notes / Notes techniques
The Institute has attempted to obtain the best
original copy available for filming. Physical
features of this copy which may alter any of the
images in the reproduction are checked below.
D
D
n
Coloured covers/
Couvertures de couleur
Coloured maps/
Cartes g6ographiques en couiaur
Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/
Pages d6color6es, tachet^es ou piqudes
Tight binding (may cause shadows or
distortion along interior margin)/
Reliure serr6 (peut causer de I'ombre ou
de la distortion le long de la marge
intdrieure)
L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire
qu'il lui a 4t6 possible de se procurer. Certains
dAfauts susceptibles de nuire A la quaiiti de la
reproduction sont not^s ci-dessous.
D
D
D
D
Coloured pages/
Pages de couleur
Coloured plates/
Planches en couleur
Show through/
Transparence
Pages damaged/
Pages endommagies
The
pos
oft
film
The
con
ort
app
The
film
inst
Mai
in o
upp
boti
folk
El
Additional comments/
Ccmmentaires suppl6mentaires
Original copy restored and laminated.
Bibliographic Notes / Notes bibliographiques
D
D
D
Only edition available/
Seule Edition disponible
Bound with other material/
Reli6 avec d'autres documents
Cover title missing/
Le titre de couverture manque
n
Pagination incorrect/
Erreurs de pagination
Pages missing/
Des pages manquent
Maps missing/
Des cartes gdographiques manquent
n
Plates missing/
Des planches manquent
Additional comments/
Commentaires suppl6mentaires
The images appearing here are the best quality
possible considering the condition and legibility
of the original copy and in keeping with the
filming contract specifications.
Les images suivantes ont AtA reproduites avec le
plus grand soin. compte tenu de la condition et
de la nettetA de I'exempialre film6, et en
conformity avec les conditions du contrat de
filmage.
The last recorded frame on each microfiche shall
contain the symbol -^ (meaning CONTINUED"),
or the symbol V (meaning "END"), whichever
applies.
Un des symboles suivants apparaTtra sur la der-
nlAre image de cheque microfiche, selon le cas:
le symbole — ^ signifie "A SUIVRE". le symbole
y signifie "FIN".
The original copy was borrowed from, and
iWmkid with, the kind consent of the following
institution:
Library of the Public
Archives of Canada
Maps or plates too large to be entirely included
in one exposure are filmed beginning in the
upper left hand corner, left to right and top to
bottom, as many frames as required. The
following diagrams illustrate the method:
L'exemplaire f ilmi fut reproduit grfice d la
g6nArosit6 de I'dtablissement prAteur
suivant :
La bibliothAque des Archives
publiques du Canada
Les cartes ou les planches trop grandes pour dtre
reproduites en un seul cliche sont fiim^es d
partir de I'angle supirieure gauche, de gauche A
droite et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre
d'images n6cessaire. Le diagramme suivant
illustre la m^thode :
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
6
6
Wh
^r\ \
^^
,>)
s
most
for tl
Prov
mark
siaD
almo
for 1"(
he ra
ment
there
Whi]
taxes
comj
way
Can?
mark
stanc
whea
to ra
[commercial union club leaflets — I ]
What Commercial Union will do for
the Farmer in Ontario. '
T is time that the Farmer sliould begin to look to
his own interest. It is time that he should claim
a voice in the Commercial Icf^islation of the
country. Hitherto, the head of the Government
been closeted before an election only with the
manufacturer, though the farming interest is by far the
mobt important and pays the bulk of the taxes.. The outlook
for the farmer in Ontario is not good. Wheat growing in this
Province will never again be what it has been. The English
market is being more and more supplied with Indian and Rus-
sian wheat. In India, the extent of wheat land seems to V)e
almost unlimited, and, as the Hindoo needs only a little ricfl
for food and hardly any clothes or fuel, he can send almost all
he raises to market; he only wants railways and better imple-
ments, both of which i& government is giving him. Then
there is likely to be vact competition from the North- West.'
While the manufacturer is 'protected against competition by
taxes laid on the farmer,' the farmer is taxed to bring down
competition on himself by building the Canadian Pacifio Rail-
way to open the North- West. England as a cattle market for
Canada has failed; it'istoo far off. Still less is the <listant
market likely to be good for v horses, as the horse may have to
stand long at livery before he is bought Engluid, now that
wheat-growing no longer pays there, will probpoly turn more
to raising her own meat and dairy produce. The value of farm
li^^/operty in Ontario has gone down greaily ; in large districts
>
'■*'
It ha8
What
Can
ii
The government seem^
it has gone down thirty per cent. The best of our young
farmers are leaving the country by hundreds.
The N. P. was to give the farmer a home market,
given him nothing but dearer clothes and •'combines."
is the N. r. but a set of additions to the taxes ?
country make itself rich by taxation I
to think so, for it goes on piling up debt and taxes. A countrv
trying to improve its condition by taxing itself is like a man
" trying to lift himself by his own boot-sti aps."
The only way of really improving the condition of the
farmer is to give him a better market. The best market in iW
world is that of the United States. The people of the United
States are now the richest in the world, and the readiest to ]'Ay
for anything which they need or fancy. Their numbers ami
wealth arc always increasing. This market, v/hich is close at
hand, not on the other side of the Atlantic, is the natural
market of the Canadian farmer. Lut he is shut out of it by a
tariff wall. That tarifl' wall Commercial Union, or call it if
you like Unrestricted Ixeciprocity, proposes to throw down,
giving the farmer of Ontario a fair market to sell in, and at the
same time a fair market to buy in, so that he may get the full
earnings of his labour and spend them to the best advantage.
Trade is trying all the time to climb over the tariff wall.
Out of our $81,000,000 worth of exports we already sell to the
Americans more than $30,000,000. Out of $105,000,000 of
imports we already buy of the Americans $45,000,000. These
figures would double or treble if the tariff wall were out of the
way.
Out of 18,779 horses that we sold, the United States
lx)ught 18,225. Out of 443,000 sheep, the United States
bought 363,000. Of 116,000 cattle, the United States bought
45,000. Of about two millions worth of eggs they bought all.
Ot 1,416,000 pounds of wool they bought 1,300,000 pounds.
Of 9,456,000 bushels of bailey they bought all. . Of 8T4:5,O0('
of hay they bought $670,000. Of 8439,000 worth of potatoes
they bought $338,000. Of $83,000 worth of general vege-
tables, they bought $75,000 worth.
Wherever an opening is made in the tariff wall, trade at
ouce rushes through. When the duty was taken off eggs, the
trade rose from a nominal amount to nearly two n:illious.
Where is the use of telling us then that the Americans would
not trade with us or that we should not profit Ijy tlio trade 1
The United States import over Sixty- MiLLiy-N dollars
worth of foreign products with all of which Canada could supply
them. The horse trade with the United States especially, is
likely to develop greatly if the trade is set free. Instead of the
horses having to stand at livery, as they do when sent to Eng-
land, the American purchaser takes them up on the spot. The
Americans use horses more and are willing to give higher
prices for them than the English.
Commercial U aion would give at the same time a free and
good market for all our products, for our minerals, in which we
are incredibly rich, but which now are not worked because
they cannot be sold, and for our lumber and our fish. All our
industries would be developed, the number of our peojile and
their power of buying would be increased, and the farmer
would then be provided with the best of home markets without
having to pay taxes or bonuses for creating it It has been
said by some who had studied the subject that if our mining
industry had free trade and fair play, our farmeit*s would have
employment enough in feeding our miners.
Under the Reciprocity Treaty the Canadian farmer pros-
pered. The Government has repeatedly tried to make an-
other treaty, showing that it recognizes the benefit of Reci-
procity. This is the answer to all the partisans of the govern-
ment who now argue that by Reciprocity the farmer would
\
giin nothing. The N. P. Tariff Act contains a standing offer
of reciprocity in natural prodicts. But this ia a mockery, ae
the Americans will not admit our natural products unlofs we
will admit their manufactures. ^ . •,
The JCnglish murket, whatever it mar be worth, will not
be closed when the Ai erican market is opened. It will re-
main just as open l|kt is now, and we shall have the advantage
of both. M A ,.%...
As to tfte Annexirtion Bogey, see Grip's woodcut below.
Reciprocity did not annex us, or show any tendency to annex
us, when we had it befiore. Why should it annex us now 1
On one side is the party Shibboleth : on the other is the
fanner's bread, and that of his wife and children. Will ho
choose the Shibboleth or the bread 1
>:'^. i Vl fc^ < *•
Printed by Hunter, Hose d: Co.^for the Commercial Union Club of Toronto.
ng offer
eery, as
I era we
'ill not
rt'ill re-
antage
below.
annex
w ?
is the
»^ill he
mto.