Skip to main content

Full text of "[Circular of household science]"

See other formats







m 7 



,!UL Irs 




Dea7' ATadam President, — Will you read the following circular to 
your club, and give the subject careful consideration ? 


There is a growing tendency a^iong thoughtful women to 
look upon the conducting of the household as a science and 
an art, instead of an affair of tradition, habit, fashion, or 
instinct. We ask you to consider what this tendency means. 
Household science is not satisfied with any routine perform- 
ance of duties, nor with any self-sacrificing devotion to trifles 
in the home. Instead, it demands of us an intelligent adap- 
tation of means to the accomplishment of really worthy ends. 
What a}'e scmie of these e?tds, and 7vhat ai'e their I'elative 
values ? What means can we best e77ipby i?i working toward 
them 1 We submit these questions to you for study. We 
cannot answer them in this circular, but we give some 
topics with comments and a list of books, which may prove 
helpful in their solution. We suggest : — 

I. That clubs form classes and study topically the subjects 
indicated, referring to the books given in the subjoined list, 
or to others which may come to their notice. A leader may 

be appointed from the class for each meeting or for the 
entire course, 

2. That, where pubhc hbraries do not contain an adequate 
number of suitable books on the subject of household 
science, they be requested to furnish them ; and, where no 
public libraries exist, clubs start circulating libraries upon 
the subject of household science. 

3. That " Home Talent Days " be held during the year, 
with papers from members, giving the results of their reading 
and study, followed by a general discussion. Exceptionally 
good papers might be lent to other clubs. 

By these means we believe that women may gain more 
information for the same expenditure of money than through 
paid lectures ; and they may learn, besides, what is most 
valuable, how to acquire knowledge of a subject through 
independent study. They may have, too, in the interchange 
of their ideas on " Home Talent Days " a really keen social 


" Let us not always say, 
* Spite of this flesh to-day 

I strove, made head, gained ground upon the whole ! ' 

As the bird wings and sings, 

Let us cry, ' All good things 

Are ours, nor soul helps flesh more now than flesh helps soul.' " 


Primarily it should be the object of all household science 
to promote in every member of the family superb physical 
health and strength. It is easy to assent to this proposition, 

but probably not one of us in fifty in apportioning our house- 
hold outlay of time and money makes health the first con- 
sideration. We are too thoughtless and too ignorant. %Do 
we realize that carpeted rooms and upholstered furniture and 
dresses which drag in the street are not compatible with 
absolute cleanliness ? Do we know, except by hearsay, any- 
thing about the nutritive value of different foods ? Do we 
value our own health -and serenity in the family more than 
the tucking or ruffling of a child's frock? Have we self- 
control enough to refrain from worrying and pushing our 
children, in order that they may excel those of our neighbor ? 
Under this topic of "health," the committee wish to call 
your attention to the subject of noon luncheons for children 
in one-session schools. Every mother knows the importance 
of proper food at certain intervals to keep the child in a 
healthy condition. The early and oftentimes light breakfast 
is entirely insufficient to last until two or three o'clock, when 
the child returns home too hungry and tired to care for food. 
Sometimes a lunch is carried from home, but not generally ; 
and the best and surest way of meeting the need is to have 
it provided in the school-house at a slight cost to the pupil. 
In Massachusetts there are 261 high schools, with an attend- 
ance of 38,133 pupils. Many of the schools have already 
adopted the method proposed. How many others are will- 
ing to try the experiment? In 1894 school lunches were 
established in the high schools in the city of Boston. In 
the beginning a public-spirited woman generously furnished 
the means, but at the present time they are practically self- 
supporting. Lunches may be furnished by contract or they 


may be largely prepared in the school kitchen. Different 
menus may be offered each day, soup and simple food 'being 
requisite. It is a satisfaction to know that, among the mas- 
ters, the testimony is unanimous that through these lunches 
the child is being educated in right living-, and that their 
beneficial effect is evident in the increased vigor of the 
pupils, and indirectly is influencing the men and women of 
the future. 

We suggest that you study the relations of this subject of 
" Health and Strength " to the following : — 

1. Cleanliness. 5. Sleep. 

2. Air and light. 6. Exercise. 

3. Food and water. 7. Cold baths as a tonic. 

4. Clothing. 8. Regularity in living. 
9. Worry, cramming in schools, idleness, undue competitive strain. 


" Simplicity is the main elegance." 


The subject of economy in the use of money was brought 
before you at the Federation meeting in Fitchburg. There 
is another economy, which saves the housekeeper's time and 
labor, that seems to us not less important. Many a house- 
wife is like a traveller endeavoring to go sight-seeing 
with six trunks to repack daily. The really important needs 
of her family she cannot attend to, because of a host of 
details and trifling elegances to look after. Could we not 
avoid much waste of time and energy through getting rid of 

superfluities, doing nothing for mere show, and systematizing 
our labor ? Is any one, not of the very poor, Hving simply 
enough, who cannot find at least an hour of leisure daily ? 
Do we recognize sufficiently the fact that a little leisure 
wisely spent may give more grace and elegance to a home 
than fine furniture, bric-k-brac, or elaborate dinners ? When 
a woman sacrifices her freshness, her cheerfulness, and her 
individual growth to her house and table and servants, is it 
not a short-sighted unselfishness ? Do we remember that 
beauty of heart and generous thought more than material 
surroundings make hospitality gracious ? Let us have the 
independence to set our own standards of living and of enter- 
taining ; and, in doing this, let us consider a little more what 
things are really most worth while. 

Could not washing, ironing, bread, pastry, and cake- 
making be done better and with a saving of time, money, 
and labor, if done co-operatively ? Good bread is compara- 
tively rare. Why should not families employ through co-op- 
eration an expert scientific bread-maker with modern improve- 
ments for baking ? A club or a group of friends might do 
the community a service by trying some experiments in 
co-operative work, to show what is possible. 

We suggest that you study the relations of this subject, 
the " Saving of Time and Labor in the Household," to the 
following : — 

1. Simplicity in style of living — in house, furniture, food, clothing. 

2. Systematization of work, 

3. Co-operation. 


" Responsibilities educate." 


One often hears parents deplore the fact that their chil- 
dren have not the same opportunities which they had of 
learning to be useful in the home. Is it so much, though, 
that opportunities for usefulness do not exist, as that they 
are not embraced ? If the members of the family, each 
according to his ability, took some share of the household 
work and responsibility, the mother could more easily find 
some hours of freedom for herself, the servant question 
would be less pressing, and the strain of meeting the expenses 
of the family diminished. Then, since it is acknowledged 
that childhood is the best time to learn to do things with the 
hands, why ask for manual training in schools and shut it 
out of the home ? Can there be any better way of giving 
men and women a sense of obligation to society than by 
teaching them early that they owe some service to the 
family ? And, if we wish to show others that we respect 
labor and believe in helping each other, must we not show it 
by example in our households ? We suggest that you con- 
sider. How under viodern conditions cJiildrcn may be made 
helpful in the household. 


" IJeauty rests on necessities." 


The importance of beauty needs very little emphasis. 
Most women strive for it sufficiently, but with results far 

from satisfactory even to themselves. We need to learn hinv 
to make our homes beautiful. For simple, practical help on 
this subject, we refer you especially to some leaflets published 
by the Twentieth Century Club, under the title of " Beauty 
in the Home," and suggest that several copies of these be 
purchased by each club for circulation among its members. 
They cost only $i.oo for twenty copies. We suggest also 
the following questions for discussion in classes, or upon 
" Home Talent Days " : — 

Is beauty best obtained by making it the chief end 
sought ? 

How shall we distinguish between the beautiful, and the 
fashionable, costly, showy, or novel ? 

Which do you value most in rooms and in furniture, 
beauty of form, of color, or of ornamentation ? 

Do you agree with the thought from Emerson, " Beauty 
rests on necessities " ? 

Why would a museum or curiosity shop not be beautiful 
as a sitting-room ? 


Hygiene and Public Health. Louis C. Parkes, M.D. (H. K. Lewis, 

How to Drain a House. George E. Waring, Jr. (H. Holt & Co., 
New York). 

The Influence of Clothing on Health. Sir Frederic Treves (Cassell 
& Co., London). 

The Commonwealth. Sir Benjamin Ward Richardson, M.D. (Long- 
mans, London). 

Health and Life. Sir Benjamin Ward Richardson, M.D. (Daldy, J., 
& Co., London). 

Dust and its Dangers. Prudden (G. P. Putnam's Sons). 

Drinking Water and Ice Supplies. Prudden ((i. P. Putnam's Sons). 

Modern Dress. T. F. Pearse, M.D. (Wyman & Sons, London). 

The Philosophy of Clothing. W. M'atthieu Williams (T. Laurie, 

Household Economics. Helen Campbell (Little, Brown & Co.). 

Domestic Science, Lucy Salmon (G. P. Putnam's Sons), 

Food for School Children. Collected Leaflets, Home Science Pub- 
lishing Company, 485 Tremont Street. 

Rumford Kitchen Leaflets, Nos. 16 and 20. 

Llousehold Financiering. Professor Smith in the Kitchen Magazine 
for September. 

House Beautiful. A magazine published by Herbert Stone & Co., 

Beauty in the Home. Leaflets published by Twentieth Century 
Club, 14 Ashburton Place. 

You will find other valuable books in the list published by 
the Anna Ticknor Library Association, Trinity Court, Sta- 
tion B, Boston ; in the one on the last page of " l^eauty in 
the Home " ; and in the one given in " Household Econom- 
ics " by Helen Campbell. 

Mrs. Sarah A. Forbes, Chainnau, 
Mrs. Mary C. Collar, 
Mr^. Anna D. Hallowici ^ 
Miss Helen A. Wright, 

Ciwunittee on Household Science 
Boston, October, 1899. J^^ ^ ^cl^ ^'^VA ^'^"^ 



3 9999 06706 668 6 

Boston Public Library 
Central Library, Copley Square 

Division of 

Reference and Research Services 

The Date Due Card in the pocket indi- 
cates the date on or before which this 
book should be returned to the Library. 

Please do not remove cards from this