CLIO, A MUSE
AND OTHER ESSAYS
LITERARY AND PEDESTRIAN
BV THE SAME AUTHOR
ENGLAND IN THE AGE OF
WYCLIFFE. 8vo, ds. net.
GARIBALDI'S DEFENCE OF THE
ROMAN REPUBLIC (1848-9). With 7
Maps and 35 Illustrations. Svo, bs. 6d. net.
GARIBALDI AND THE THOUSAND
(May, i860). With 5 Maps and numerous
Illustrations. 8vo, 75. 6d. net.
GARIBALDI AND THE MAKING OF
ITALY (May-November, i860). With 4
Maps and numerous Illustrations. 8vo,
"js. 6d. net.
ENGLISH SONGS OF ITALIAN
FREEDOM. Chosen and Arranged, with
an Introduction, by George M. Trevelyan.
Crown 8vo, gilt top, 3^. 6d, net.
LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO.
LONDON, NEW YORK, BOMBAY, AND CALCUTTA
CLIO, A MUSE
AND OTHER ESSAYS
LITERARY AND PEDESTRIAN
BY
GEORGE MACAULAY TREVELYAN
LATE FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE
AUTHOR OF "the POETRY AND PHILOSOPHY OF GEORGE MEREDITH"
"garibaldi's DEFENCE OF THE ROMAN REPUBLIC,"
"the LIFE OF JOHN BRIGHT," ETC.
SECOND IMPRESSION
LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO.
39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON
NEW YORK, BOMBAY, AND CALCUTTA
I913
All rights reserved
la ' ?
TO
WALTER MORLEY FLETCHER
The essays on "Poetry and Rebellion" and the
" Middle Marches " are reprinted from the Indepen-
dent Review, with alterations ; " If Napoleon had
Won the Battle of Waterloo " is reprinted from the
Westminster Gazette; and a portion of the essay
on " George Meredith " from the Nation. My best
thanks are due for permission to reproduce them.
CONTENTS
>'Clio, a Muse
Walking ....
George Meredith
Poetry and Rebellion
John Woolman, the Quaker
Poor Muggleton and the Classics
The Middle Marches
If Napoleon had Won the Battle of Waterloo
PAGE
I
56
82
lOI
^33
143
153
184
Map of the Middle Marches
157
Wind of the morning, wind of the gloaming, wind of the night,
What is it that you whisper to the moor
All the day long and every day and year,
Resting and whispering, rustling and whispering, hastening and
whispering
Around, across, beneath
The tufts and hollows of the listening heath ?
Geoffrey Young, Wind and Hill.
CLIO, A MUSE
AND OTHER ESSAYS, LITERARY
AND PEDESTRIAN
CLIO, A MUSE W^-sV^^riA.!
The last fifty years have witnessed great changes
in the manasement of Clio's temple. Changes in
* ^ the Temple
Her inspired prophets and bards have of Clio.
passed away and been succeeded by the priests of
an established church ; the vulgar have been ex-
cluded from the Court of the Gentiles ; doctrine
has been defined ; heretics have been excommuni-
cated ; and the tombs of the aforesaid prophets
have been duly blackened by the new hierarchy.
While these changes were in process the statue of
the Muse was seen to wink an eye. Was it in ap-
proval, or in derision ?
Two generations back, history was a part of our
national literature, written by persons moving at
large in the world of letters or politics. Among
them were a few writers of genius, and many of
remarkable talent, who did much to mould the
2 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
thought and inspire the feeling of the day. Of
recent years the popular influence of history has
greatly diminished. The thought and
feeling of the rising generation is but
little affected by historians. History was, by her
own friends, proclaimed a "science" for specialists,
not " literature " for the common reader of books.
And the common reader of books has accepted his
discharge.
That is one half of the revolution. But fortu-
nately that is not all. Whereas fifty years ago
history had no standing in higher education, and
even twenty years ago but little, to-day
Clio is driving the classical Athene out of
the field, as the popular Arts course in our Universities.
The good results attained by University historical
teaching, when brought to bear on the raw product
of our public schools, is a great fact in modern
education. But it means very hard work for the
History Dons, who, in the time they can spare from
these heavy educational tasks, must write the modern
history books. Fifty years ago there were no such
people ; to-day they are a most important but sadly
overworked class of men.
Such is the double aspect of the change in the
status of history. The gain in the deeper, aca-
demic life of the nation must be set off against the
loss in its wider, literary life. To ignore either is
to be most partial. But must we always submit to
CLIO, A MUSE 3
the loss in order to secure the gain ? Already
during the last decade there are signs in the highest
quarters of a reconciling process, of a synthesis
of the scientific to the literary view of history.
Streaks of whitewash have been observed on the
tombs of those bards and prophets whose bones
Professor Seeley burned twenty years ago. When
no less an authority than Professor Firth thinks
it worth while to edit Macaulay ; when Mr. Gooch
in his History of Historians can give an admirable
appreciation of Carlyle, times are evidently chang-
ing a little in those high places whence ideas gradu-
ally filter down through educational England. Isis
and Camus, reverend sires, foot it slow — but sure.
It is then in no cantankerous spirit against the
present generation of academic historians, but in all
gratitude, admiration and personal friendship towards
them, that I launch this "delicate investigation"
into the character of history. What did the Muse
mean when she winked ?
These new History Schools, still at the formative
period of their growth, are to the world of .^^^ ^^^ g.g
older learning what Western Canada is to *<>^ Schools.
England to-day. Settlers pour into the historical
land of promise who, a generation back, would have
striven for a livelihood in the older "schools" and
" triposes." The danger to new countries with a
population rapidly increasing is lest life there grow
4 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
up hastily into a raw materialism, a dead level of
uniform ambition all directed to the mere acquisition
of dollars. In the historical world the analogue of
the almighty dollar is the crude document. If a
student digs up a new document, he is happy, he
has succeeded ; if not, he is unhappy, he has failed.
There is some danger that the overwhelming rush
of immigrants into the new History Schools may
cause us to lose some of the old culture and the
great memories. But I hope that we shall not be
forgetful of the Mother Country.
And who is the Mother Country to Anglo-Saxon
historians ? Some reply " Germany," but others of
England or ^s prefer to answer "England." The
Germany. methods and limitations of German learn-
ing presumably suit the Germans, but are certain
to prove a strait waistcoat to English limbs and
faculties. We ought to look to the free, popular,
literary traditions of history in our own land. Until
quite recent times, from the days of Clarendon down
through Gibbon, Carlyle and Macaulay to Green
and Lecky, historical writing was not merely Qhe
mutual conversation of scholars with one another^
but was the means of spreading far and wide through-
out all the reading classes a love and knowledge of
history, an elevated and critical patriotism and
certain qualities of mind and heart. But all that
has been stopped, and an attempt has been made to
drill us into so many Potsdam Guards of learning.
CLIO, A MUSE 5
We cannot, however, decide this question on a
mere point of patriotism. It is necessary to ask a
priori whether the modern German or the old English
ideal was the right one. It is necessary to ask,
"What is history and what is its use?" We must
"gang o'er the fundamentals," as the old Scotch
lady with the ear trumpet said so alarm- The Funda-
mental
ingly to the new minister when he en- questions.
tered her room on his introductory visit. So I now
ask, what is the object of the life of man qud historian ?
Is it to know the past and enjoy it forever ? Or is
it to do one's duty to one's neighbour and cause him
also to know the past ? The answer to these theoretic
questions must have practical effects on the teaching
and learning, the writing and reading of history.
The root questions can be put in these terms : —
" Ought history to be merely the Accumulation of
facts about the past ? Or ought it also to be the
Interpretation of facts about the past ? Or, one
step further, ought it to be not merely the Accumu-
lation and Interpretation of facts, but also the Exposi-
tion of these facts and opinions in their full emotional
and intellectual value to a wide public by the difficult
art of literature ? "
The words in italics raise another question which
can be put thus : —
" Ought emotion to be excluded from history on the
ground that history deals only with the science of
cause and effect in human affairs ? "
[^
^
6 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
It will be well to begin the discussion by consider-
ing the alleged "science of cause and effect in human
affairs." This alleged "science" does not exist, and
cannot ever exist in any degree of accuracy remotely
deserving to be described by the word " science."
Difference be- V^^ ideal that the facts of history are of
^^^^ ^" value as part of an exact science con-
Science, fined to specialists] is due to a misapplica-
tion of the analogy of physical science. Physical
science would still be of immense, though doubtless
diminished value, even if the general public had no
smattering thereof,)even if Sir Robert Ball had never *>£,
lectured, and Huxley had never slaughtered bishops
for a Roman holiday.
OThe functions of physical science are mainly two.
Direct utility in practical fields ; and in more intel-
lectual fields the deduction of laws of " cause and
effect." Now history can perform neither of these
functions.
In the first place it has no practical utility like
physical science. INo one can by a knowledge of
history, however profound, invent the steam-engine,
or light a town, or cure cancer, or make wheat grow
near the arctic circle^ For this reason there is not
in the case of history, as there is in the case of
physical science, any utilitarian value at all in the
accumulation of knowledge by a small number' of
students, repositories of secrets unknown to the
vulgar.
CLIO, A MUSE 7
In the second place history cannot, Hke physical
science, deduce causal laws of general application, t
AH attempts have failed to discover laws of " cause /)[ \
and effect" which are certain to repeat themselves
in the institutions and affairs of men.\The law of
gravitation may be scientifically proved because it is
universal and simple. But the historical law that
starvation brings on revolt is not proved ; indeed the
opposite statement, that starvation leads to abject
submission, is equally true in the light of past events.
You cannot so completely isolate any historical event
from its circumstances as to be able to deduce from
it a law of general application. Only politicians
adorning their speeches with historical arguments
have this power ; and even they never agree. An
historical event cannot be isolated from its circum-
stances, any more than the onion from its skins,
because an event is itself nothing but a set of circum-
stances, none of which will ever recur.
To bring the matter to the test, what are the
"laws" which historical "science" has discovered
in the last forty years, since it cleared the laboratory
of those wretched " literary historians " ? Medea
has successfully put the old man into the pot, but
I fail to see the fine youth whom she promised us.
Not only can no causal laws of universal appli-
cation be discovered in so complex a subject, but
the interpretation of the cause and effect of any one
particular event cannot rightly be called "scientific."
8 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
The collection of facts, the weighing of evidence as
to what events happened, are in some sense scientific ;
but not so the discovery of the causes and effects of
those events. In dealing even with an affair of which
the facts are so comparatively well known as those
of the French Revolution, it is impossible accurately
to examine the psychology of twenty-five million
different persons, of whom — except a few hundreds
or thousands — the lives and motives are buried in
♦he black night of the utterly forgotten. No one,
therefore, can ever give a complete or wholly true
account of the causes of the French Revolution.
But several imperfect readings of history are better
than none at all ; and he will give the best inter-
pretation who, having discovered and weighed all
the important evidence obtainable, has the largest
grasp of intellect, the warmest human sympathy, the
highest imaginative powers. Carlyle, at
Carlyle.
least in his greatest work, fulfilled the last
two conditions, and therefore his psychology of
the mob in the days of mob rule, his flame-picture of
what was in very fact a conflagration, his portraits of
individual characters — Louis, Sieyes, Danton, Marat,
Robespierre — are in the most important sense more
true than the cold analysis of the same events
and the conventional summings up of the same
] persons by scientific historians who, with more
■ knowledge of facts, have less understanding of Man.
It was not till later in his life that Carlyle went mad
CLIO, A MUSE 9
with Hero-worship and ceased to understand his
fellow-men with that all-embracing tolerance and
sympathy which is the spiritual hall-mark of his
French Revolution :
"The Fireship is old France, the old French Form
'' of Life ; her crew a generation of men. Wild are
" their cries and their ragings there, like spirits
"tormented in that flame. But, on the whole, are
" they not gone, O Reader ? Their fireship and they,
"frightening the world, have sailed away ; its flame^
"and its thunders quite away, into the Deep of Time.
"One thing therefore History will do : pity them all,
"for it went hard with them all."
But the fatal weakness even of that great book is
that its author knew nothing in detail about the ancien
regime and the " old French Form of Life." He
described the course of the fire but he knew nothing
of the combustibles or of the match.
How indeed could history be a " science " ? You
can dissect the body of a man, and argue thence the
general structure of the bodies of other men. But
you cannot dissect a mind ; and if you could, you
could not argue thence about other minds.^ You can
know nothing scientifically of the twenty million
minds of a nation. The few facts we know may or
may not be typical of the rest. Therefore, in the
most important part of its business, history is not a
scientific deduction, but an imaginative guess at the
most likely generalisations.
lo CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
History is only in part a matter of " fact." Collect
the " facts " of the French Revolution ! You must go
down to Hell and up to Heaven to fetch them.[__The
pride of the physical scientist is attacked, and often
justly. But what is his pride compared with the
pride of the historian who thinks that his collection
of "facts" will suffice for a scientific study of cause
and effect in human affairs ? 1 "The economist," said
Professor Marshall,^ " needs imagination above all to
put him on the track of those causes of events which
are remote or lie below the surface." Now if, as
Need of im- Professor Marshall tells us, imagination
agination in
History. IS necessary for the economist, by how
much more is it necessary for the historian, if he
wishes to discover the causes of man's action, not
merely as a bread-winning individual, but in all his
myriad capacities of passion and of thought. The
man who is himself devoid of emotion or enthusiasm
can seldom credit, and can never understand, the
emotions of others, which have none the less played
a principal part in cause and effect. Therefore, even
if history were a science of cause and effect, that
would be a reason not for excluding but for including
emotion as part of the historian's method.
It was no unemotional historian, but the author of
Sartor Resarius, who found out that Cromwell was
not a hypocrite. Carlyle did not arrive at this result
1 Economic Teaching at the Universities in Relation to Public Well-
Being.
CLIO, A MUSE II
by a strictly deductive process, but it was none the
less true, and, unlike many historical discoveries, it was
of great value. Carlyle, indeed, sometimes neglected
the accumulation of facts and the proper sifting of
evidence. He is not to be imitated as a model
historian, but he should be read and considered by
all historical students, because of his imaginative and
narrative qualities. While he lacks what modern
historical method has acquired, he possesses in the
fullest degree what it has lost.
Carlyle uses constantly an historical method which
Gibbon and Maitland use sometimes, and other
historians scarcely at all — humour. The " dignity of
history," whether literary or scientific, is too often
afraid of contact with the comic spirit. Yet there
are historical situations, just as there are domestic
and social situations, which can only be carlyie's
treated usefully or even truthfully by l^^our.
seeing the fun of them. How else could Anacharsis
Clootz' deputation of the Human Species to the French
Assembly be profitably told ? " From bench and
"gallery comes 'repeated applause'; for what august
" Senator but is flattered even by the very shadow of
" the Human Species depending on him ? Anacharsis
" and the ' Foreigners' Committee ' shall have place at
"the Federation; on condition of telling their respective
"Peoples what they see there. In the meantime, we
" invite them to the ' honours of the sitting, honneur de
" la stance.' A long-flowing Turk, for rejoinder, bows
l^
12 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
"with Eastern solemnity, and utters articulate sounds :
" but owing to his imperfect knowledge of the French
" dialect, his words are like spilt water ; the thought
"he had in him remains conjectural to this day."
I conclude, therefore, that the analogy of physical
science has misled many historians during the last
thirty years right away from the truth about their
profession. /There is no utilitarian value in knowledge
of the past, and there is no way of scientifically
deducing causal laws about the action of human
Value of beings in the mass. In short, the value
History is °
educational, of history is not scientific. Its true value
is educational. It can educate the minds of men by
causing them to reflect on the past.\
Even if cause and effect could bfe discovered with
accuracy, they still would not be the most interesting
part of human affairs. It is not man's evolution but
his attainment that is the great lesson of the past and
^ the highest theme of history. The deeds
happened. themselves are more interesting than their
causes and effects, and are fortunately ascertainable
with much greater precision. " Scientific " treatment
of the evidence (there only can we speak to some
extent of " science ") can establish with reasonable
certainty that such and such events occurred, that
one man did this and another said that. And the
story of great events is itself of the highest value
when it is properly treated by the intellect and the
CLIO, A MUSE 13
imagination of the historian. The feelings, specula- V
tions and actions of the soldiers of Cromwell's army
are interesting in themselves, not merely as part of
a process of "cause and effect." Doubtless, through
the long succeeding centuries the deeds of these men
had their effect, as one amid the thousand confused
waves that give the impulse to the world's ebb and
flow. But how great or small their effect was, must
be a matter of wide speculation ; and their ultimate
success or failure, whatever that may have been,
was largely ruled by incalculable chance. \It is the
business of the historian to generalise and to guess "XA
as to cause and effect, but he should do it modestly
and not call it " science," and he should not regard
it as his first duty, which is to tell the story .\ For,
irrespective of " cause and efTect," we want to know
the thoughts and deeds of Cromwell's soldiers, as
one of the higher products and achievements of
the human race, a thing never to be repeated, that
once took shape and was. And so, too, with Charles
and his Cavaliers, we want to know what they were
like and what they did, for neither will they ever
come again. On the whole, we have been faithfully
served in this matter by Carlyle, Gardiner and Pro-
fessor Firth.
It is the tale of the thing done, even more than
its causes and effects, which trains the political
judgment by widening the range of sympathy and
deepening the approval and disapproval of con-
14 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
science ; that stimulates by example youth to aspire
and age to endure ; that enables us by the light of what
men once have been, to see the thing we are, and dimly
to descry the form of what we should be. " Is not Man's
history and Men's history a perpetual evangel ? "
It is because the historians of to-day were trained
by the Germanising hierarchy to regard history not
as an " evangel " or even as a " story," but as a
" science," that they have so much neglected what
Narrative the ^^ ^^^^^ ^^^ the principal craft of the
histo^':°its historian— the art of narrative. It is in
neglect. narrative that modern historical writing
is weakest, and to my thinking it is a very serious
weakness — spinal in fact. Some writers would seem
never to have studied the art of telling a story.
There is no " flow " in their events, which stand like
ponds instead of running like streams. Yet history
is, in its unchangeable essence, "a. tale." Round
the story, as flesh and blood round the bone, should
be gathered many different things — character draw-
ing, study of social and intellectual movements,
speculations as to probable causes and effects, and
whatever else the historian can bring to illuminate
the past. But the art of history remains always the
art of narrative. That is the bed rock.
It is possible that, in the days of Carlyle and
Macaulay, Motley and Michelet, too much thought
was given to narrative, at least in comparison with
other aspects of history, for absolutely too much can
CLIO, A MUSE 15
never be given. It is possible that when Professor
Seeley said, " Break the drowsy spell of narrative.
Ask yourself questions, set yourself problems," he
may have been serving his generation. But it is
time now for a swing of the pendulum. " The drowsy
spell of narrative " has been broken with a vengeance.
Readers find little " spell " in historical narrative
nowadays — however it may be with the "drowsiness."
One day, as I was walking along the side of Great
Gable, thinking of history and forgetting the mountains
which I trod, I chanced to look up and see the top
of a long green ridge outlined on the blue horizon.
For half a minute I stood in thoughtless enjoyment
of this new range, noting upon it forms of beauty
and qualities of romance, until suddenly I remembered
that I was looking at the top of Helvellyn ! Instantly,
as by magic, its shape seemed to change under my
eyes, and the qualities with which I had endowed
the unknown mountain to fall away, because I now
knew what like were its hidden base and its averted
side, what names and memories clung round it. The
change taking place in its aspect seemed physical,
but I suppose it was only a trick of my own mind.
Even so, if we could forget for a while all that had
happened since the Battle of Waterloo, Difficulty of
we should see it, not as we see it now, o^^anc^sfors*
with all its time-honoured associations point of view,
and its conventionalised place in history, but as our
1 6 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
ancestors saw it first, when they did not know
whether the " Hundred Days," as we now call them,
would not stretch out for a Hundred Years. Every
true history must{ by its human and vital presentation
of events, force us to remember that the past was
once real as the present and uncertain as the future, j
Even in our personal experience, we have probaBTy
noticed the uncanny difference between events when
they first appear red hot, and the same events calmly
reviewed, cold and dead, in the perspective of sub-
sequent happenings. I sometimes remember, each
time with a shock of surprise, how the Boer War
and the Election of 1906 appeared to me while they
were still portents, unsettling our former modes of
thought and expectation. Normally I cannot recol-
lect what I then felt. It comes back to me only at
chance moments when my mind has let slip all forms
and pressures stamped on it in later days. It is not
that my worthless " opinions " have altered since
then. I am speaking of something much more subtle
and potent than " opinions " ; I mean the pangs felt
by the soul as she hastily adapts herself to new
circumstances, when some strange joy or terror,
with face half hid, ineluctably advances. I have
forgotten most of it, but I remember some of it
sometimes, as in a dream.
Now, if so great a change of emotional attitude
towards an event can take place in the same person
within a few years, how very different must our view
CLIO, A MUSE 17
of the Battle of Waterloo and of the Reform Bill of
1832 be from the aspect which first they bore to our
grandfathers and great-grandfathers, men so very
different from ourselves, brought up in habits of
thought and conduct long passed away. Deeply are
they buried from our sight
" Under the downtrodden pall
Of the leaves of many years,"
and sometimes deeper still under the formulae of con-
ventional history. To recover some of our ancestors'
real thoughts and feelings is the hardest, subtlest and
most educative function that the historian can per-
form. It is much more difficult than to spin guess-
work generalisations, the reflex of passing phases of
thought or opinion in our own day. To give a true
picture of any country, or man or group of men in
the past requires industry and knowledge, for only
the documents can tell us the truth, but it requires
also insight, sympathy and imagination of -pj^e qualities
the finest, and last but not least the art requisite,
of making our ancestors live again in modern narra-
tive. Carlyle, at his rare best, could do it. If you
would know what the night before a journee in the
French Revolution was like, read his account of the
eve of August 10, in the chapter called "The Steeples
at Midnight." Whether or not it is entirely accurate
in detail, it is true in effect : the spirit of that long
dead hour rises on us from the night of time past.
Maitland, too, has done it for the legal side of the
i8 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
English mediaeval mind — the only side thereof yet
clearly revealed to us except what we see through
Chaucer's magic little window.
On a somewhat lower imaginative plane Professor
Pollard is doing wonders in showing us how the
Professor folks in Tudor times thought about their
fheRefor^** affairs, political and religious. This is
mation. great news, for hitherto the English
Reformation has mainly been told from the point
of view either of priests, curates or Orangemen of
the nineteenth century. Professor Pollard's work is
a credit to latter-day history, and is much more true
than that of Froude or his opponents. But, although
Professor Pollard is one of the most popular living
historians, he does not arouse the same amount of
public interest that those antagonists used to excite.
This is partly, no doubt, because the public is less
interested in religious controversy. But it is also
partly because the public is less interested in history,
and by a habit of mind now inbred, thinks that
a professional historian must be writing his best
books not for the nation but for his fellow-students.
And the worst of it is that this lamentable error was
put about in the last generation by the historians
themselves, when they denounced from the altar
any of their profession, alive or dead, who had had
dealings with literature.
But since history has no properly scientific value,
its only purpose is educative. And if historians
CLIO, A MUSE 19
neglect to educate the public, if they fail to interest
it intelligently in the past, then all their historical
learning is valueless except in so far as it educates
themselves.
What, then, are the various ways in which history
can educate the mind ?
^The first, or at least the most generally acknow-
ledged educational effect of history, is to train the
mind of the citizen into a state in which History as a
he is capable of taking a just view of poh°t°ca/
political problems^ But, even in this """isdom.
capacity, history cannot prophesy the future ; it
cannot supply a set of invariably applicable laws
for the guidance of politicians ; it cannot show, by
the deductions of historical analogy, which side is
in the right in any quarrel of our own day. It can
do a thing less, and yet greater than all these. [^^
can mould the mind itself into the capability of
understanding great affairs and sympathising with
other men. The information given by history is
valueless in itself, unless it produce a new state of
mindTl The value of Lecky's Irish history did not
consist in the fact that he recorded in a book the
details of numerous massacres and murders, but
that he produced sympathy and shame, and caused
a better understanding among us all of how the sins
of the fathers are often visited upon the children,
unto the third and fourth generations of them that
20 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
hate each other. He does not prove that Home
Rule is right or wrong, but he trains the mind of
Unionists and Home Rulers to think sensibly about
that and other problems.
For it is in this political function of history that
the study of cause and effect is of some real use.
Though such a study can be neither scientific nor
exact, common sense sometimes points to an obvious
causal connection. Thus it was supposed, even
before the invention of scientific history, that Alva's
policy was in some causal connection with the revolt
of the Netherlands, that Brunswick's manifesto had
something to do with the September Massacres, and
the September Massacres with the spread of reaction.
Such suggestions of cause and effect in the past
help to teach political wisdom. When a man of
the world reads history, he is called on to form a
judgment on a social or political problem, without
previous bias, and with some knowledge of the final
protracted result of what was done. The exercise
of his mind under such unwonted conditions, sends
him back to the still unsettled problems of modern
politics and society, with larger views, clearer head
and better temper. The study of past controversies,
of which the final outcome is known, destroys the
spirit of prejudice. It brings home to the mind the
evils that are likely to spring from violent policy, based
on want of understanding of opponents. When a
man has studied the history of the Democrats and
CLIO, A MUSE 21
Aristocrats of Corcyra, of the English and Irish,
of the Jacobins and anti-Jacobins, his poHtical views
may remain the same, but his poUtical temper and
his way of thinking about politics may have
improved, if he is capable of receiving an im-
pression.
[ And so, too, in a larger sphere than politics, a
review of the process of historical evolution teaches
a man to see his own age, with its peculiar History
. broadens the
ideals and uiterests, ni proper perspective outlook.
as one among other ages.\ If he can learn to under-
stand that other ages had not only a different social
and' economic structure but correspondingly different
ideals and interests from those of his own age, his
mind will have veritably enlarged. I have hopes
that ere long the Workers' Educational Association
will have taught its historical students not to ask,
" What was Shakespeare's attitude to Democracy ? "
and to perceive that the question no more admits
of an answer than the inquiry, " What was
Dante's attitude to Protestantism ? " or, " What was
Archimedes' attitude to the steam-engine ? "
The study of cause and effect is by no means
the only, and perhaps not the principal means, of
broadening the mind. History does most to cure
a man of political prejudice, when it enables him,
by reading about men or movements in the past,
to understand points of view which he never saw
before, and to respect ideals which he had formerly
2a CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
despised. Gardiner's History of the Civil War has
done much to explain Englishmen to each other,
by reveahng the rich variety of our national life,
far nobler than the unity of similitude. Forms
of idealism, considerations of policy and wisdom,
are acceptable or at least comprehensible, when
presented by the historian to minds which would
reject them if they came from the political opponent
or the professed sage.
But history should not only remove prejudice, it
should breed enthusiasm. To many it is an important
Should breed source of the ideas that inspire their lives.
an?s\'ggeTt With the exception of a few creative
ideals. minds, men are too weak to fly by their
own unaided imagination beyond the circle of ideas
that govern the world in which they are placed.
ArxfTsince the ideals of no one epoch can in them-
selves be sufficient as an interpretation of life, it is
fortunate that the student of the past can draw
upon the purest springs of ancient thought and
feeling.) Men will join in associations to propagate
the old-new idea, and to recast society again in
the ancient mould, as when the study of Plutarch
and the ancient historians rekindled the breath of
liberty and of civic virtue in modern Europe ; as
when in our own day men attempt to revive
mediaeval ideals of religious or of corporate life,
or to rise to the Greek standard of the individual.
We may like or dislike such revivals, but at least
CLIO, A MUSE 23
they bear witness to the potency of history as some-
thing quite other than a science. And outside the
circle of these larger influences, history supplies
us each with private ideals, only too varied and
too numerous for complete realisation. One may
aspire to the best characteristics of a man of
Athens or a citizen of Rome ; a Churchman of the
twelfth century, or a Reformer of the sixteenth ; a
Cavalier of the old school, or a Puritan of the Inde-
pendent party ; a Radical of the time of Castle-
reagh, or a public servant of the time of Peel.
Still more are individual great men the model and
inspiration of the smaller. It is difficult to appro-
priate the essential qualities of these old people
under new conditions ; but whatever we study
with strong loving conception, and admire as a
thing good in itself and not merely good for
its purpose or its age, we do in some measure
absorb.
This presentation of ideals and heroes from other
ages is perhaps the most important among the edu-
cative functions of history. For this purpose, even
more than for the purpose of teaching Truth re-
quires pas-
political wisdom, it is requisite that the sion.
feyents should be both written and read with intel-
lectual passion."\ Truth itself will be the gainer,
for those by whom history was enacted were in
their day passionate.
Another educative function of history is to enable
24 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
the reader to comprehend the historical aspect of
The historical Hterature proper. Literature can no
aspect of
Literature. doubt be enjoyed in its highest aspects
even if the reader is ignorant of history. But on
those terms it cannot be enjoyed completely, and
much of it cannot be enjoyed at all. For much
of literature is allusion, either definite or implied.
And the allusions, even of the Victorian age, are
by this time historical. For example, the last half
dozen stanzas of Browning's Old Pictures in Florence,
the fifth stanza of his Lovers' Quarrel, and half his
wife's best poems are already meaningless unless
we know something of the continental history of that
day. Political authors like Burke, Sydney Smith, and
Courier, the prose of Milton, one-half of Swift, the best
of Dryden, and the best of Byron (his satires and
letters) are enjoyed ceteris paribus, in exact proportion
to the amount we know of the history of their times.
And since allusions to classical history and mytho-
logy, and even to the Bible, are no longer, as they
used to be, familiar ground for all educated readers,
there is all the more reason, in the interest of litera-
ture, why allusions to modern history should be
generally understood. History and literature cannot
be fully comprehended, still less fully enjoyed, except
in connection with one another. I confess I have
little love either for " Histories of Literature," or
for chapters on " the literature of the period,"
hanging at the end of history books like the tail
CLIO, A MUSE 25
from a cow. I mean, rather, that those who write
or read the history of a period should be soaked in
its Hterature, and that those who read or expound
Hterature should be soaked in history. The " scien-
tific" view of history that discouraged such inter-
change and desired the strictest speciahsation by
political historians, has done much harm to our
latter-day culture. The mid-Victorians at any rate
knew better than that.
The substitution of a pseudo-scientific for a literary
atmosphere in historical circles, has not only done
much to divorce history from the outside public,
but has diminished its humanising power over its
own devotees in school and university. Not a few
university teachers are already conscious of this
and are trying to remedy it, having seen that his-
torical " science " for the undergraduate means the
text-book, that is, the " crammer " in print. At
one university as I know, and at others I dare
say, literature already plays a greater part in
historical teaching and reading than it played
some years ago. Historical students are now en-
couraged to read the " literary " historians of old,
who were recently taboo, and still more to read
the contemporary literature of periods studied.
But for all that, there is much leeway to be
made up.
■ The value and pleasure of travel, whether at home
or abroad, is doubled by a knowledge of history.
26 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
For places, like books, have an interest or a beauty
History and of association, as well as an absolute or
local associa- « • ,
tion. aesthetic beauty. Ihe garden front of
St. John's, Oxford, is beautiful to every one ; but,
for the lover of history, its outward charm is blent
with the intimate feelings of his own mind, with
images of that same College as it was during the
Great Civil War. Given over to the use of a Court
whose days of royalty were numbered, its walks and
quadrangles were filled, as the end came near, with
men and women learning to accept sorrow as
their lot through life, the ambitious abandoning
hope of power, the wealthy hardening themselves
to embrace poverty, those who loved England pre-
paring to sail for foreign shores, and lovers to be
parted forever. There they strolled through the
garden, as the hopeless evenings fell, listening,
at the end of all, while the siege-guns broke the
silence with ominous iteration. Behind the cannon
on those low hills to northward were ranked the
inexorable men who came to lay their hands on
all this beauty, hoping to change it to strength
and sterner virtue. And this was the curse of the
victors, not to die, but to live, and almost to lose their
awful faith in God, when they saw the Restoration,
not of the old gaiety that was too gay for them
and the old loyalty that was too loyal for them,
but of corruption and selfishness that had neither
country nor king. The sound of the Roundhead
CLIO, A MUSE 27
cannon has long ago died away, but still the silence
of the garden is heavy with unalterable fate, brooding
over besiegers and besieged, in such haste to de-
stroy each other and permit only the vile to survive.
St. John's College is not mere stone and mortar,
tastefully compiled, but an appropriate and mournful
witness between those who see it now and those
by whom it once was seen. And so it is, for the
reader of history, with every ruined castle and
ancient church throughout the wide, mysterious
lands of Europe.
Battlefield hunting, a sport of which my dear
master, Edward Bowen, was the most Battlefield
strenuous and successful patron, is one ^"^^mg.
of the joys that history can afford to every walker
and cyclist, and even to the man in the motor,
if he can stir himself to get out to see the
country through which he is whirled. The charm
of an historic battlefield is its fortuitous character.
Chance selected this field out of so many, that
low wall, this gentle slope of grass, a windmill,
a farm or straggling hedge, to turn the tide
of war and decide the fate of nations and of
creeds. Look on this scene, restored to its rustic
sleep that was so rudely interrupted on that one
day in all the ages ; and looking, laugh at the
" science of history." But for some honest soldier's
pluck or luck in the decisive onslaught round yonder
village spire, the lost cause would now be hailed
2 8 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
as " the tide of inevitable tendency " that nothing
could have turned aside ! How charmingly remote
and casual are such places as Rosbach and Valmy,
Senlac and Marston Moor. Or take the case of
Morat. There, over that green hill beneath the
lowland firwood, the mountaineers from alp and
glacier-foot swept on with thundering feet and
bellowing war horns, and at sight of their levelled
pikes the Burgundian chivalry, arrayed in all the
gorgeous trappings of the Renaissance armourers,
fled headlong into Morat lake down there. From
that day forward, Swiss democracy, thrusting aside
the Duke of Savoy, planted itself on the Genevan
shore, and Europe, therefore, in the fulness of time,
got Calvin and Rousseau. A fine chain of cause
and effect, which I lay humbly at the feet of
science
" 1
The skilled game of identifying positions on a
battlefield innocent of guides, where one must make
out everything for oneself — best of all if no one has
ever done it properly before — is almost the greatest of
out-door intellectual pleasures.^ But the solution of
the military problem is not all. If the unsentimental
tourist thinks of the men who fought there merely as
pawns in a game of chess, if the moral issues of the
^ Let me recommend Mr. Oman's History of the Art of War to
would-be hunters of battlefields, if any of them do not know it. That
work and Gardiner's Civil War will set them to work the right way on
many of our best British battlefields. But when is Mr. Oman's instructive
and delightful book to be completed ?
CLIO, A MUSE 29
war are unknown to him or indifferent, he loses half
that he might have had. To be perfect, he must know
and feel what kind of men they were who climbed
the terraces at Calatafimi or stormed the rifle-pits on
Missionary Ridge ; who marched up to the stockade
at Blenheim to the sound of fife and drum ; who
hacked at each other that evening on Marston Moor.
And it is best of all when the battle decided some-
thing great that still has a claim on our gratitude. As
a humble follower of Mr. Norman Angell, I regret that
the well-meaning poet who sang long ago of ''old
Kaspar" was not historically better informed. To
choose Blenheim as an example of a useless waste of
blood and treasure was unfortunate, for it was one of
the few battles thoroughly worth fighting. "OldKas-
par's " mis-
" What they fought each other for " ! take.
Why, to save us all from belonging to the French
king who had at that moment got Spain, Italy,
Belgium, and half Germany in his pocket. To pre-
vent Western Europe from sinking under a Czardom
inspired by the Jesuits. To make the " Sun King's "
system of despotism and religious persecution look so
weak and silly beside English freedom that all the
philosophers and wits of the new century would make
mock of it. Who would have listened to Voltaire and
Rousseau, or even to Montesquieu, if Blenheim had
gone the other way, and the Grand Monarch had been
gathered in glory to the grave ? We are always tell-
ing ourselves " How England saved Europe " from
30 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
Napoleon — truly enough, though incidentally we
handed her over to taskmasters only a degree less
abominable. But we hear very little of "how Eng-
land saved Europe " from Louis XIV. How many
Englishmen have ever visited Blenheim ? It is as
good a field as Waterloo, though a little further off in
time and space, and it still lies undisfigured by monu-
ments, its villages and fields still as old Kaspar knew
them, between the wooded hills above and the reedy
islands of slow moving Danube, into which Tallard's
horse were driven headlong on that day of deliver-
ance to mankind.
In this vexed question whether history is an art or
j^^ Qj. a science, let us call it both or call it
Science? neither. For it has an element of both.
Neitner or
^o*^- It is not in guessing at historical "cause
and effect" that science comes in; but in collecting
and weighing evidence as to facts, something of the
scientific spirit is required for an historian, just as it
is for a detective or a politician.
To my mind, there are three distinct functions of
history, that we may call the scientific, the imagina-
The three tive or speculative, 2in6. ihe literary. First
history. comes what we may call the scientific, if
we confine the word to this narrow but vital function,
the day-labour that every historian must well and
truly perform if he is to be a serious member of his
profession — the accumulation of facts and the sifting
CLIO, A MUSE 31
of evidence. " Every great historian has been his
own Dry-as-dust," said Stubbs, and quoted Carlyle
as the example. Then comes the imaginative or
speculative, when he plays with the facts that he has
gathered, selects and classifies them, and makes his
guesses and generalisations. And last but not least
comes the literary function, the^ exposition of the
results of science and imagination in a form that will
attract and educate our fellow-countrymen, j For
this last process I use the word literature, because I
wish to lay greater stress than modern historians are
willing to do, both on the difficulty and also on the
importance of planning and writing a powerful narra-
tive of historical events. Arrangement, composition
and style are not as easily acquired as the art of
type-writing. Literature never helps any man at
his task until, to obtain her services, he is willing to
be her faithful apprentice. Writing is not, therefore,
a secondary but one of the primary tasks of the
historian.
Another reason why I prefer to use the word
'' literature " for the expository side of the historian's
work, is that literature itself is in our
, . • 1 1 1 ii i^i . . "Literature."
day impoverished by these attempts to cut
it off from scholarship and serious thought. It would
be disastrous if the reading public came to think of
literature not as a grave matron, but as a mere fille
de joie. Until near the end of the nineteenth century,
literature was held to mean not only plays, novels
32 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
and belles lettres, but all writing that was above a
certain standard of excellence. Novels, if they are
bad enough, are not literature. Pamphlets, if they
are good enough, are literature — for example, the
pamphlets of Milton, Swift and Burke. Huxley's
essays and Maine's treatises are literature. Even
Maitland's expositions of mediaeval law are litera-
ture. Maitland, indeed, wrote well rather by force
of genius, by natural brilliancy, than by any great
attention paid to composition, form and style. But
for us little people it is just that conscious attention
to book-planning, composition and style that I would
advocate.
All students who may some day write history,
and in any case will be judges of what is written,
should be encouraged to make a critical study of
past masters of English historical literature. Yet
there were many places a little time ago where it
was tacitly accepted as passable and even praise-
worthy in an historical student to know nothing of
the great English historians prior to Stubbs. And,
for all I know, there are such places still.
In France historical writing is on a higher level
than in England, because the Frenchman is taught
French his- to write his own language as part of his
torical
writing. school curriculum. The French savant
is bred, if not born, a prose writer. Consequently
when he arrives at manhood he already writes well
by habit. The recent union effected in France of
CLIO, A MUSE 33
German standards of research with this native power
of composition and style, has produced a French
historical school that turns out yearly a supply of
history books at once scholarly and delightful. Of
course any attempt to assimilate English history
to the uniform French pattern would be as foolish
as the recent attempt to assimilate it to the German.
We must be ourselves. All our scholars cannot
be expected to write with the smooth cadence and
lucid sequence of idea that is the hall-mark of
the commonest French writers. But many more
of us, if we held it our duty to labour at writing
well, would soon rival French stylists ; and not
seldom, in the future as in the past, some master
of our language might arise who would surpass
them far.
French is in any case an easier language to manipu-
late than our own. Apart even from the handicaps
in our system of education, it is probably harder for
the English than for the French historian to write
prose up to a certain level of excellence. But if
that is so, it is only an added reason for a greater
expenditure of effort on prose composition and book-
planning by the rising generation of English his-
torians. It is very difficult to write good Literary side
English prose ; and to tell a learned story ^^^^^£°h'Ir?"
as it should be told requires both Intel- labour,
lectual and artistic effort. The idea that history is
a " soft option " for classics and science still subtly
34 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
operates to keep some of the very best men out of
the history schools. This would cease altogether to
be the case, if it were universally recognised that
history is not merely the accumulation and interpre-
tation of facts, — hard enough that, in itself ! — but
involves besides the whole art of book composition
and prose style. Life is short, art is long, but history
is longest, for it is art added to scholarship.
The idea that histories which are delightful to read
must be the work of superficial temperaments, and
that a crabbed style betokens a deep thinker or
conscientious worker, is the reverse of the truth.
What is easy to read has been difficult to write.
The labour of writing and rewriting, correcting and
recorrecting, is the due exacted by every good book
from its author, even if he know from the beginning
exactly what he wants to say. A limpid style is
invariably the result of hard labour, and the easily
flowing connection of sentence with sentence and
paragraph with paragraph has always been won by
the sweat of the brow.
Now in the case of history, all this artistic work
is superimposed on the labours of scholarship, them-
selves enough to fill a lifetime. The historical archi-
tect must quarry his own stones and build with his
own hands. Division of labour is only possible in
a Umited degree. No wonder then that there
have been so few historians really on a level with
the opportunities of their great themes, and that,
CLIO, A MUSE 35
except Gibbon^ every one of them is imperfect either
in science or in art. The double task, hard as it is,
we little people must shoulder as best we may, in the
temporary absence of giants. And if the finest intel-
lects of the rising generation can be made to realise
how hard is the task of history, more of them will
become historians.
Writing history well is no child's-play. The round-
ing of every sentence and of every paragraph has to
be made consistent with a score of facts, some of
them known only to the author, some of them perhaps
discovered or remembered by him at the last moment
to the entire destruction of some carefully erected
artistic structure. In such cases there is The tempta-
an undoubted temptation to the artist to Jj^JJ-a^^Jis-
neglect such small, inconvenient pieces torian.
of truth. That, I think, is the one strong point in
the scholar's outcry against " literary history " ; but if
we wish to swim we must go into the water, and there
is little use in cloistered virtue, nor much more in
cloistered scholarship. In history, as it is now written,
art is sacrificed to science ten times for every time
that science is sacrificed to art.
It will be well here, in our search after the true
__E^nglish tradition, to hold briefly in review the history
of history, so far as our own island is concerned.
Clarendon was the father of English history.
The Chroniclers and Shakespeare, Bacon and Sir
36 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
Walter Raleigh had prepared the way, but Clarendon,
Development ^Y his History of the Great Rebellion, estab-
His^tofJ?'^ lished the English tradition, which lasted
Clarendon. {qj- \y^Q hundred years : the tradition,
namely, that history was a part of the national
literature, and was meant for the education and
delight of all who read books. Like Thucydides, and
Philippe de Comines before him, Clarendon wrote a
chronicle of great events in which he had himself
taken part. For in those early days, whether in
ancient Athens, mediaeval France or Stuart England,
there was no large body of trained antiquaries
collecting, sorting and studying the documents of
the past ; and therefore history, if it was to be in
the least detailed and even partially reliable, must
needs concern itself only with contemporary affairs.
That w^as a grave limitation and disadvantage ; yet
Clarendon's partisan history of his own time was
raised by the dignity of its author's mind, and the
grave majestic eloquence of his style, into a treasure-
house whence five successive generations of the
English governing class, both the Tories who agreed
and the Whigs who disagreed with his principles,
drew their first deep lessons in the art of politics
and in the management of men, their pride in the
institutions of the country which they were called upon
to govern, and their detailed knowledge of the great
events in the past by which those institutions had
been shaped and inspired. There is no class that
CLIO, A MUSE 37
has any such education to-day. When I was at
Harrow I came across an antiquarian survival of this
Clarendon regime: the Head Master, according to an
excellent old custom, used faithfully to present a
copy of Clarendon's history to every sixth-form boy
when he left the school. But in my day I doubt
whether many sixth-form boys of their own free will
opened that or any other history book. How it is
now, I know not.
During the century that followed Clarendon, many
people wrote political memoirs and '' histories of my
own time" modelled more or less successfully upon
his great exemplar. Of these, Burnet's is one of the
best known. By means of this Clarendonian litera-
ture, most educated persons were admirably trained in
the history of the earlier and later Stuart Revolutions.
After this Clarendonian epoch, of which the best
products were contemporary history and political
memoirs, there followed, in the middle of the
eighteenth century, attempts to collect evidence
and write reliable history about events in the past
altogether outside the author's own experience. This
movement, associated with the names of Hume and
Robertson, was rendered possible by the antiquarian
activity and scientific spirit of the "age of reason."
The new school quickly culminated in the perfect
genius of Gibbon. I call his genius
^ . *=* Gibbon.
perfect because, though limited, it had no
faults in its kind. As all historians should aspire to
38 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
1^ do, Gibbon united accuracy with art. If proof is
needed that a hterary history may be accurate, it is
found in Gibbon. His scientific work of sifting all
the evidence that was in his day available, has
suffered singularly little from criticism, even in
our archaeological age when the spade corrects
the pen. His literary art was no less perfect, and
was the result of infinite pains to become a great
writer. If Gibbon had taken as little trouble about
writing as later historians, his volumes would have
been as little read, and would have perished as
quickly as theirs.
I have said that Gibbon had his limitations, though
his science and his art were alike perfect of their
kind. His limitations were those of his age. His
friends and contemporaries, the encyclopaedist philo-
sophers, prepared the successes and errors of the
French Revolution by their a priori conception of
society in all countries as a blank sheet for the pen of
I pure reason. Like them Gibbon conceived mankind
to be essentially the same in all ages and in all
countries. In all ages and in all countries his sceptical
eye detected the same classes, the same passions, the
same follies. For him, there is always and every-
where the ruler, the philosopher, the mob, the aristo-
crat, the fanatic and the augur, alike in ancient Rome
or modern France and England. He did not perceive
that the thoughts of men, as well as the framework of
society, differ from age to age. The long centuries
CLIO, A MUSE 39
of diverse human experience which he chronicled /
with such passionless equanimity, look all much the
same in the cold, classical light of his reason. /
But Gibbon was scarcely in the grave when a genius
arose in Scotland who once and probably for ever
transformed mankind's conception of itself from the
classical to the romantic, from the uniform to the
variegated. Gibbon's cold, classical light was replaced
by the rich mediaeval hues of Walter
„ , Scott.
Scott s stained glass. To Scott each age,
each profession, each country, each province had its
own manners, its own dress, its own way of thinking,
talking and fighting. To Scott a man is not so much a
human being as a type produced by special environ-
ment whether it be a border-farmer, a mediaeval abbot,
a cavalier, a covenanter, a Swiss pikeman, or an
Elizabethan statesman. No doubt Scott exaggerated
his theme as all innovators are wont to do. But he
did more than any professional historian to make man-
kind advance towards a true conception of history, for
it was he who first perceived tha^_Uie history of man-
kind is not simple but complex, tliaf:' history never
repeats itself but ever creates new forms differing
according to time and place^ The great antiquarian
and novelist showed historians that history must be
living, many-coloured and romantic if it is to be a
true mirror of the past.^ Macaulay, who was a boy
^ Both as literature and as social history his Scotch novels are his best.
They are the real truth about the land which "the Shirra " knew so well,
40 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
while Scott's poems and novels were coming out, and
who knew them, Hterally, by heart, was not slow to
learn this lesson.
Then followed the Victorian age, the period when
history in England reached the height of its popularity
and of its influence on the national mind. In the
eighteenth century the educated class had been
numerically very small, though it had been a most
powerful and discriminating patron of letters and
The Victorian learning, above all of history. No
®^** country house of any pretension was
without its Clarendon, Robertson, Hume, and Gibbon,
as can be seen in many an old neglected private
library to-day, where now the inhabitants, in the
intervals of golf and motoring, wear off the edge of
their intellects on magazines and bad novels.
In the Victorian era education and reading was
beginning to spread from the few to the many, and
the modern habit of reading mainly trash had not yet
set in. Therefore it was a golden age for all sorts of
literature, including history. In the earlier half of
the Victorian period, when Arnold and Milman,
Grote and Merivale flourished, the American Motley
and Prescott were household words over here as well
as in their own country. It is hard for us to conceive
whereas Ivanhoe, Queniin Durward and Woodstock are only the guess-
work of learning and genius, in every way less valuable now than they
once were. But when first published, those novels, no less than the
Scotch novels, revealed to an astonished world the reality and variety of
past ages.
CLIO, A MUSE 41
the degree to which serious history affected our grand-
fathers. History no longer, as in the eighteenth
century, confined its influence to the upper classes.
I have often seen Motley's Dutch Republic on the
ancestral shelf of a country cottage or an inn parlour,
where only magazines and novels are now added to
the pile.
Above all others there were Macaulay and Carlyle.
Of Carlyle I have spoken already, as an historian not
indeed to be imitated directly, but to be admired and
studied because he was a man of genius, and because
he was everything good and bad that we modern
historians are not. Of Macaulay, too, something must
here be said, because an undistinguishing condemna-
tion of him used to be the shibboleth of that school
of English historians who destroyed the habit of
reading history among their fellow-countrymen.
In "arrangement," that is to say, in the planning of
the book, in the way subject leads on to subject
and paragraph to paragraph, Macaulay's
Macaulay.
History has no equal and ought to be
carefully studied by every one who intends to write
a narrative history. His " style," the actual form
of his sentences, ought not to be imitated, partly
because it is open to criticism, still more because
it was his own and inimitable. But if anybody
could imitate his "arrangement" and then invent
a " style " as effective for our age as Macaulay's
was for his, he would be able to make the best
42 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
results of the modern history school familiar to
hundreds of thousands, and influential on all the
higher thought and feeling of the day.
People have been taught to suppose that Macaulay's
Wiiiggism was his worst historical fault. I wish it
had been. His real fault was an inherent over-
certainty of temper, flattered by the easy victories
of his youth. He never met serious historical criti-
cism or resistance until he was too old to change.^
But in his view of history he was not such a Whig
as he has been painted. Not only does he per-
petually fall foul of the Whigs on minor issues, but
he censures them on the point of their main policy
at the end of Charles II's reign— the candidature
of Monmouth for the throne. And again, when
having beaten Louis to his knees they refused to
make peace with him, their supposed apologist
writes : " It seems to us that on the great question
which divided England during the last four years
of Anne's reign the Tories were in the right and
the Whigs were in the wrong." This position he
maintained against his Tory friend and fellow-
historian, Lord Mahon. Shaftesbury, the founder of
the Whig party, is treated by this " Whig historian "
' The same may be said of other great Victorians — Carlyle and Ruskin
in particular. Our own age is too critical to be highly favourable to
creative genius, that is in regions where there are any literary or intel-
lectual standards at all. But the early Victorian age had not enough
criticism to trim the mighty plants that grew in it so wild. Matthew
Arnold came twenty years too late for this purpose.
CLIO, A MUSE 43
with marked animosity, and even unfairness. Shaftes-
bury is accused of advising "the Stop on the
Exchequer," which in fact he opposed ; and is
never given credit for any disinterested motive. No
doubt Shaftesbury, like most of the statesmen of
that era, was a very bad man, but modern historians
differ from Macaulay in ascribing to the first Whig
some quahties not wholly devihsh. It is clear that
in this case at least Macaulay was misled not by
his " Whiggism " but by a too simple-hearted hatred
of knavery and by the artistic instinct to paint a
study in black. And from this it is fair arguing that
in some other cases where the paint is laid on too
thick, the temptation to which he has yielded has
not been political but artistic. Antithesis was dear
to him not only in the composition of his sentences
but in the delineation of his characters. It was with
him a matter not of politics but of unconscious
instinct to contrast as vividly as possible the selfish-
ness with the genius of Marlborough. But unfortu-
nately he lived to complete only the least important
and pleasing half of the picture. He had blocked
in only too well the black background, but died
before he came to the red coat and eagle eye of the
victor of Blenheim. If Macaulay had lived another
five years, Marlborough would now enjoy the full
meed of admiration and gratitude still denied to
him by his countrymen's little knowledge of what
he did.
44 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
Mommsen and Treitschke, at whose German
shrines we have been instructed to sacrifice the
traditions of English history, were partisans, the one
of Roman, the other of Prussian Caesarism, more
bhnd and bitter than Macaulay was of middle-class
Parliamentary government. Macaulay's historical
sympathy was, more often than not, aroused by
courage, honesty or literary merit, irrespective of
party or creed. But Mommsen's treatment of Caesar's
enemies is an outrage against good sense and
feeling. Compare his unworthy sneers at Cicero
to Macaulay's reverence for the genius of Dryden
and Swift, the piety and moral courage of Jeremy
Collier, the valour of Claverhouse at Killiecrankie or
Sarsfield at Limerick. Macaulay's generosity of mind
— within its natural limitations — the glow of pride
with which he speaks of anything and anybody
who has ennobled the annals of our country or of
European civilisation, his indignation with knaves,
poltroons and bullies of all parties and creeds, his
intense and infectious pleasure in the annals of the
past, rendered his history of England an education
in patriotism, humanity and statesmanship. The
book made men proud of their country, it made them
understand her institutions, how they had come into
existence and how liberty and order had been won
by the wear and tear of contending factions. His
Whiggism in the historical field consisted of a belief
in religious toleration and Parliamentary government,
CLIO, A MUSE 45
principles in which an historian has just as good a
right to believe, as in absolutism and persecution.
His errors as an historian sprang not from his
opinions on Church and State which, right or wrong,
were commonplace enough, being very much those
of a moderate free-trade Unionist of the present day.
Neither did his errors spring from any limitation in
his reading, which was far deeper than that of any
English historian in his own time. Neither was
he lacking in general equipment as an historian : he
was a very good linguist ; he was a man of the world
and accustomed to great public affairs ; and he was
a fine historical lawyer — Maitland one day, in
praising Macaulay, said to me that he was always
right in the frequent discussions of legal points
that characterise his History, It was not then from
his politics, nor from lack of reading his authorities,
nor from lack of general equipment that his errors
sprang. They sprang from three sources. First, from
a too great reliance on his miraculous memory and
an insufBcient use of notes. Secondly, from too great
certainty of temper, a combined precision and limita-
tion of intellectual outlook which annoyed men like
Matthew Arnold and John Morley in the more
sceptical age that followed his own and will continue
in a less degree to annoy most of us, though we can
now afford to be more fair towards him than were
those first rebels against his once so formidable power.
And, lastly, he had a disastrous habit of attributing
46 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
motives ; he was never content to say that a man did
this or that, and leave his motives to conjecture ; he
must always needs analyse all that had passed through
the mind of his dramatis personce as if he were the
God who had created them. In this habit of always
attributing motives as if they were known matters
of fact, Macaulay is " a warning to the young."
In his own day and for a generation after his
death his History of England was read by hundreds
of thousands of his countrymen, and it made our
history and institutions familiar to all the world.
If I have been right in arguing that the ultimate
value of history is not scientific but educational, then
the service that he rendered to Clio by making her
known to the people was the most essential and
pertinent of all.
Indeed in the period immediately following on
Macaulay's death, history seemed to be coming to
The golden ^^'^ own. His works and Carlyle's con-
age^ tinned to be read, and those of Motley,
Froude, Lecky, Green, Symonds, Spencer Walpole,
Leslie Stephen, John Morley and others carried on
the tradition that history was related to literature.
The foundations of a broad, national culture, based
upon knowledge of our history and pride in Eng-
land's past, seemed to be securely laid. The coming
generation of historians had only to build upon the
great foundation of popularity laid for them by
their predecessors, erecting whatever new structures
CLIO, A MUSE 47
of political or other opinion they wished, but pre-
serving the basis of literary history, of history as
the educator of the people. But they preferred to
destroy the foundations, to sever the tie between
history and the reading public. They gave it out
that Carlyle and Macaulay were " literary historians"
and therefore ought not to be read. The public,
hearing thus on authority that they had been "ex-
posed " and were " unsound," ceased to
The reaction,
read them — or anybody else. Hearing
that history was a science, they left it to scientists.
The craving for lighter literature which characterised
the new generation combined with the academic
dead-set against literary history to break the public
of its old habit of reading history books.
At the present moment the state of affairs seems
to me both better and worse than it was twenty years
ago when I came to Cambridge as an undergraduate,
and was solemnly instructed by the author of Ecce Homo
that Macaulay and Carlyle did not know what they
were writing about and that "literary history" was
a thing of nought. The present genera- Is a counter-
tion of historians at O.xford and Cam- ginning?
bridge have ceased, so far as I am aware, to preach
this fanatical crusade ; they recognise that history
has more than one function and are ready to welcome
various kinds of historians. There is therefore much
hope for the future, because ideas on such matters
in the end spread down from the Universities to
48 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
the schools and the country, and gradually permeate
opinion far away.
But for the present things in the country at large
are scarcely better than they were twenty years ago.
We are still suffering the consequence of the anti-
literary campaign carried on by the historical chiefs
of the recent past. Schoolmasters, private tutors
and other purveyors of general ideas are often a
generation behind the time, though striving hard
to say and do what they imagine to be the " correct
thing." The camp-followers of the historical army
of to-day sometimes seek an easy reputation by
repeating as the last word of wisdom the shibboleths
of the anti-literary movement, which appears to me
to be regarded as somewhat out of date in the centre
of things at the Universities. I have more than once
come across the case of schoolboys being positively
forbidden to read Macaulay, who, whether he be a
guide for grown-ups or not, is certainly an admirable
stimulus to the sluggish youthful mind, none too
apt to develop enthusiasm either for history or for
literature. And I have known a history book
condemned by a reviewer on the ground that it
would read aloud well ! Often, when recommending
some readable and stimulating history, I have been
answered : " Oh ! but has not his view been proved
incorrect ? " Or " Is he not out of date ? I am told
one ought not to read him now." And so, the
" literary historians " being ruled out by authority,
CLIO, A MUSE 49
the would-be student declines on some wretched text-
book, or else reads nothing at all.
This attitude of mind is not only disastrous in its
consequences to the intellectual life of the country,
but radically unsound in its premises. For it assumes
that history — "scientific history" — has "proved"
certain views to be true and others to be false. Now
history can prove the truth or falsehood of facts
but not of opinions. When a man begins with
the pompous formula — "The verdict of "The Verdict
history is — " suspect him at once, for of History."
he is merely dressing up his own opinions in big
words. Fifty years ago the "verdict of history"
was mainly Whig and Protestant ; twenty years
ago mainly Tory and Anglo-Catholic ; to-day it is,
fortunately, much more variegated. Each juror now
brings in his own verdict — generally with a recom-
mendation of everyone to mercy. There is even
some danger that history may encourage the idea
that all sides in the quarrels of the past were equally
right and equally wrong.
There is no "verdict of history," other than the
private opinion of the individual. And no one
historian can possibly see more than a fraction of
the truth ; if he sees all sides, he will probably not
see very deeply into any one of them. The only
way in which a reader can arrive at a valuable
judgment on some historical period is to read several
good histories, whether contemporary or modern,
D
NX
50 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
written from several different points of view, and to
think about them for himself. ^ But too often the
reading of good books and the exercise of individual
judgment are shirked, while some vacuous text-book
is favoured on the ground that it is " impartial " and
No short cut " up-to-date." But no book, least of all
to truth. a text-book, affords a short cut to the
historical truth. \fhe truth is not grey, it is black
and white in patches. And there is nothing black
or white but thinking makes it so.y
The dispassionateness of the historian is a quality
Dispassion- ^'^ich it is easy to value too highly, and
ateness, [^ should not be confused with the really
indispensable qualities of accuracy and good faith.
We cannot be at too great pains to see that our
passion burns pure, but we must not extinguish the
flame. Dispassionateness — ni/ adniirari — may betray
the most gifted historian into missing some vital
truth in his subject. In Creighton's treatment of
Luther, all that he says is both fair and accurate,
yet from Creighton alone you would not guess that
Luther was a great man or the German Reformation
a stirring and remarkable movement. The few pages
on Luther in Carlyle's Heroes are the proper comple-
1 Biography is very useful for this purpose. The lives of rival states-
men, warriors and thinkers, provided they are good books, are often the
quickest route to the several points of view that composed the life of an
epoch. Ceteris paribus, a single biography is more likely to mislead than
a history of the period, but several biographies are often more deeply
instructive than a single history.
CLIO, A MUSE 51
ment to this excessively dispassionate history. The
two should be read together.
Acton is sometimes thought of by the outside
public as an impartial and dispassionate historian.
Yet it was his favourite doctrine that history ought
always to be passing moral judgments — generally
very severe ones. On every subject that
^ ■' ■" Acton,
he treated historically he showed himself
a strong partisan, although his "party" in Church
and State seems to have consisted of only one
member. Nor was he deficient in the artistic sense :
his lectures at Cambridge were dramatic perform-
ances, with surprises, limelights and curtains. He
dearly liked to " make your flesh creep." No doubt
these qualities sometimes misled him,^ but if he had
not had in him ethical passion and artistic sense he
would by now be forgotten. Lord Acton's opinions
are not likely to be accepted by anyone en masse, and
for my part I accept only a small portion of them ;
yet I firmly believe that his opinions and the zeal
with which he held them were the spiritual force that
made him not only a great man but a great historian.
In the Victorian age the influence of historians
and of historical thinkers did much to wantofhis-
form the ideas of the new era, though less gnceTregr^t-
of course than the poets and novelists. *^^ie.
To-day almost all that is characteristic in the mind of
^ Sec Edinburgh Review, April 1907.
52 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
the young generation is derived from novelists and
playwrights. It is natural and right that novelists and
playwrights (provided we can count among them
poets !) should do most to form the type of mind of
any generation, but a little steadying from other
influences like history might be a good leaven in
modern gospels and movements.
The public has ceased to watch with any interest
the appearance of historical works, good or bad.
The Cambridge Modern History is indeed bought by
the yard to decorate bookshelves, but it is regarded like
the Encyclopcedia Britannica as a work of reference ;
its mere presence in the library is enough. Publishers,
meanwhile, palm off on the public books manufactured
for them in Grub Street, — " publisher's books," which
Present dis- ^^^ neither literature nor first - hand
contents. scholarship. This is the type generically
known as "Criminal Queens of History,"spicy memoirs
of dead courts and pseudo-biographical chatter about
Napoleon and his family, how many eggs he ate and
how many miles he drove a day. And Lady Hamilton
is a great stand-by. The public understands that this
kind of prurient journalism is history lightly served
up for the general appetite, whereas serious history is
a sacred thing pinnacled afar on frozen heights of
science, not to be approached save after a long
novitiate.
By itself, this picture of our present discontents
would be exaggerated and one-sided. There is much
CLIO, A MUSE 53
truth in it, 1 fear, but on the other hand there is much
good in the present and more hope in the future.
For a new pubHc has arisen, a vast democracy of all
classes from " public " school and " council " school
alike, taught to read but not knowing what to read ;
men and women of this new democracy of intellect,
from millionaire to mechanic, refuse to be bored
in a world where the means of amusement have
been brought to every door ; but subject to that
condition, the best of them, the natural leaders of
the rest, are athirst for thought and knowledge if
only it be presented to them in an interesting
form.
To meet this demand, to grasp this opportunity,
several great movements are now afoot. Newmove-
The new historical teaching at universities rightVire^c^-*
and public schools is one of them. The *'^°°-
Workers' Educational Association is another. A
third is the movement for short outline books written
by the best specialists in the most popular style they
can master. The Home University Library is the
principal of these — organised by Mr. Herbert Fisher,
and supported by books from half a dozen others
among our very best historians. All this is magnificent.
I only hope that yet another movement, tending in
another way to meet the opportunities of the new
age, will also gradually come about. I mean that
not merely these small handbooks, but the main
works of our historical scholars should be written not
^4 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
merely for the perusal of brother historians but for the
best portion of the general public; in other words, that
they should be written as literature. And above all,
One thing that the art of narrative in history should
8 1 needed, j.^^ treated with much greater reverence,
and accorded a larger portion of the effort and brain-
power which our modern historians dispend so
generously, and in other respects so fruitfully, in the
service of Clio.
If, as we have so often been told with such glee,
the days of "literary history" have gone never to
return, the world is left the poorer. Self-congratula-
tion on this head is but the mood of the shorn fox
in the fable. History as literature has a function
Value of lit- ^^ ^^^ Own, and we suffer to-day from its
erary history, atrophy, [jine English prose, when de-
voted to the serious exposition of fact and argument,
has a glory of its ownjand the civilisation that boasts
only of creative fiction on one side and science on
the other may be great but is not complete. Prose
is seldom equal to poetry either in the fine manipula-
ftion of words or in emotional content, yet it can
have great value in both those kinds, and when to
these it adds the intellectual exactness of argument
or narrative that poetry does not seek to rival, then
is i^ sovereign in its own realm,] To read sustained
and magnificent historical narrative educates the mind
and the character ; some even, whose natures, craving
the definite, seldom respond to poetry, find in such
CLIO, A MUSE 55
writing the highest pleasure that they know. Un-
fortunately, historians of literary genius have never
been plentiful, and we are told that there will never
be any more. Certainly we shall have to wait for
them, but let us also wish for them and work for
them. If we confess that we lack something, and
cease to make a merit of our chief defect, if we
encourage the rising generation to work at the art
of construction and narrative as a part of the
historian's task, we may at once get a better level
of historical writing, and our children may live to
enjoy modern Gibbons, judicious Carlyles and scepti-
cal Macaulays.
WALKING
" La chose que je regrette le plus, dans les details de ma vie dont j'ai
'' perdu la memoire, est de n'avoir pas fait des journaux de mes voyac:;es.
"Jamais je n'ai tant pense, tant existe, tant vecu, tant ete moi, si j'ose
"ainsi dire, que dans ceux que j'ai faits seul et a pied." — Rousseau,
Confessions, I. iv.
" When you have made an early start, followed the coastguard track
" on the slopes above the cliffs, struggled through the gold and purple
"carpeting ofgorse and heather on the moors, dipped down into quaint
" little coves with a primitive fishing village, followed the blinding white-
" ness of the sands round a lonely bay, and at last emerged upon a headland
"where you can settle into a nook of the rocks, look down upon the
" glorious blue of the Atlantic waves breaking into foam on the granite,
"and see the distant sea-levels glimmering away till they blend imper-
" ceptibly into cloudland ; then you can consume your modest sandwiches,
" light your pipe, and feel more virtuous and thoroughly at peace with the
" universe than it is easy even to conceive yourself elsewhere. I have
" fancied myself on such occasions a felicitous blend of poet and saint —
" which is an agreeable sensation. What I wish to point out, however, is
" that the sensation is confined to the walker." — Leslie Stephen, In
Praise of Walking.
I HAVE two doctors, my left leg and my right. When
body and mind are out of gear (and those twin parts
of me Hve at such close quarters that the one always
catches melancholy from the other) I know that I
have only to call in my doctors and I shall be well
again.
Mr. Arnold Bennett has written a religious tract
called The Human Machine. Philosophers and
clergymen are always discussing why we should be
s6
WALKING 57
good — as if any one doubted that he ought to be.
But Mr. Bennett has tackled the real problem of
ethics and religion — how we can make ourselves
be good. We all of us know that we ought to be
cheerful to ourselves and kind to others, but cheerful-
ness is often and kindness sometimes as unattainable
as sleep in a white night. That combination of mind
and body which I call my soul is often so choked up
with bad thoughts or useless worries, that
*' Books and my food, and summer rain
Knock on my sullen heart in vain."
It is then that I call in my two doctors to carry me
off for the day.
Mr. Bennett's recipe for the blue devils is different.
He proposes a course of mental " Swedish exercises,"
to develop by force of will the habit of " concentrating
thought" away from useless angers and obsessions
and directing it into clearer channels. This is good,
and I hope that every one will read and practise
Mr. Bennett's precepts. It is good, but it is not all.
For there are times when my thoughts, having been
duly concentrated on the right spot, refuse to fire,
and will think nothing except general misery ; and
such times, I suppose, are known to all of us.
On these occasions my recipe is to go for a long
walk. My thoughts start out with me like blood-
stained mutineers debauching themselves on board
the ship they have captured, but I bring them home
58 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
at nightfall, larking and tumbling over each other
like happy little boy-scouts at play, yet obedient to
every order to " concentrate " for any purpose Mr.
Bennett or I may wish.
" A Sunday well spent
Means a week of content."
That is, of course, a Sunday spent with both legs
swinging all day over ground where grass or heather
grows. I have often known the righteous forsaken
and his seed begging their bread, but I never knew
a man go for an honest day's walk, for whatever
distance, great or small, his pair of compasses could
measure out in the time, and not have his reward
in the repossession of his own soul.
In this medicinal use of Walking, as the Sabbath-
day refection of the tired town worker, companion-
ship is good, and the more friends who join us on the
tramp the merrier. For there is not time, as there
is on the longer holiday or walking tour, for body
and mind to attain that point of training when the
higher ecstasies of Walking are felt through the
whole being, those joys that crave silence and soli-
tude. And indeed, on these humbler occasions, the
first half of the day's walk, before the Human
Machine has recovered its tone, may be dreary
enough without the laughter of good company, ring-
ing round the interchange of genial and irresponsible
verdicts on the topics of the day. For this reason
WALKING 59
informal Walking societies should be formed among
friends in towns, for week-end or Sabbath walks in
the neighbouring country. I never get better talk
than in these moving Parliaments, and good talk is
itself something.
But here I am reminded of a shrewd criticism
directed against such talking patrols by a good walker
who has written a book on Walking.^ " In such a
case," writes Mr. Sidgwick, " In such a case walking
"goes by the board; the company either loiters"
[it depends who is leading] "and trails in clenched
"controversy" [then the trailers must be left behind
without pity] " or, what is worse sacrilege, strides
"blindly across country like a herd of animals,
"recking little of whence they come or whither they
" are going, desecrating the face of nature with sophism
"and inference and authority, and regurgitated Blue
" Book." [A palpable hit !] " At the end of such a
" day what have they profited ? Their gross and
" perishable physical frames may have been refreshed :
" their less gross but equally perishable minds may
" have been exercised : but what of their immortal
"being? It has been starved between the blind
"swing of the legs below and the fruitless flicker-
"ing of the mind above, instead of receiving,
" through the agency of quiet mind and a co-
-ordinated body, the gentle nutriment which is its
"due."
* Sidgwick, IValking Essays, pp. lo-ll.
6o CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
Now this passage shows that the author thoroughly
understands the high, ultimate end of Walking, which
is indeed something other than to promote talk. But
he does not make due allowance for times, seasons,
and circumstances. You cannot do much with your
" immortal soul " in a day's walk in Surrey between
one fortnight's work in London and the next ; if
"body" can be " refreshed " and "mind exercised,"
it is as much as can be hoped for. The perfection
of Walking, such as Mr. Sidgwick describes in the last
sentence quoted, requires longer time, more perfect
training, and, for some of us at least, a different
kind of scenery. Meanwhile let us have good talk
as we tramp the lanes.
Nursery lore tells us that " Charles I walked and
talked : half an hour after his head was cut off."
Mr. Sidgwick evidently thinks that it was a case not
merely of post hoc but propter hoc, an example of
summary but just punishment. Yet, if I read Crom-
well aright, he no less than his royal victim would
have talked as he walked. And Cromwell reminds
me of Carlyle, who carried the art of " walking and
talking " to perfection as one of the highest of human
functions. Who does not remember his description
of " the sunny summer afternoon " when he and
Irving " walked and talked a good sixteen miles " ?
Those who have gone walks with Carlyle tell us
that then most of all the lire kindled. And because
he talked well when he walked with others, he felt
WALKING 6 1
and thought all the more when he walked alone,
" given up to his bits of reflections in the silence
" of the moors and hills." He was alone when he
walked his fifty-four miles in the day, from Muirkirk
to Dumfries, "the longest walk I ever made," he
tells us. Carlyle is in every sense a patron saint
of Walking, and his vote is emphatically given 7iot
for the " gospel of silence " !
Though I demand silent walking less, I desire
solitary walking more than Mr. Sidgwick. Silence is
not enough, I must have solitude for the perfect walk,
which is very different from the Sunday tramp. When
you are really walking'^ the presence of a companion,
involving such irksome considerations as whether the
pace suits him, whether he wishes to go up by the
rocks or down by the burn, still more the haunting
fear that he may begin to talk, disturbs the harmony
of body, mind, and soul when they stride along no
longer conscious of their separate, jarring entities,
made one together in mystic union with the
earth, with the hills that still beckon, with the
sunset that still shows the tufted moor under foot,
with old darkness and its stars that take you to
their breast with rapture when the hard ring-
ing of heels proclaims that you have struck the
final road.
Yet even in such high hours a companion may be
^ Is there the same sort of difference between tramping and walkitig as
between /aflW/?«^ and rowing, scrambling d,nd climbing?
62 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
good, if you like him well, if you know that he likes
you and the pace, and that he shares your ecstasy of
body and mind. Even as I write, memories are
whispering at my ear how disloyal I am thus to
proclaim only solitary walks as perfect. There
comes back to me an evening at the end of a stubborn
day, when, full of miles and wine, we two were
striding towards San Marino over the crest of a high
limestone moor — trodden of old by better men
in more desperate mood — one of us stripped to
the waist, the warm rain falling on our heads
and shoulders, our minds become mere instru-
ments to register the goodness and harmony of
things, our bodies an animated part of the earth
we trod.
And again, from out of the depth of days and
nights gone by and forgotten, I have a vision not
forgettable of making the steep ascent to Volterra,
for the first time, under the circlings of the stars ;
the smell of unseen almond blossom in the air ; the
lights of Italy far below us ; ancient Tuscany just
above us, where we were to sup and sleep guarded
by the giant walls. Few went to Volterra then, but
years have passed, and now I am glad to think that
many go yf ante de mieux, in motor cars; yet so they
cannot hear the silence we heard, or smell the almond
blossom we smelt, and if they did they could not feel
them as the walker can feel. On that night was
companionship dear to my heart, as also on the
WALKING 63
evening when together we lifted the view of distant
Trasimene, being full of the wine of Papal Pienza and
striding on to a supper washed down by Monte
Pulciano itself drawn straight from its native cellars.
Be not shocked, temperate reader 1 In Italy wine
is not a luxury of doubtful omen, but a necessary part
of that good country's food. And if you have walked
twenty-five miles and are going on again afterwards,
you can imbibe Falstaffian potions and still be as lithe
and ready for the field as Prince Hal at Shrewsbury.
Remember also that in the Latin village tea is in
default. And how could you walk the last ten miles
without tea ? By a providential ordering, wine in
Italy is like tea in England, recuperative and innocent
of later reaction. Then, too, there are wines in
remote Tuscan villages that a cardinal might envy,
wines which travel not, but century after century
pour forth their nectar for a little clan of peasants,
and for any wise English youth who knows that Italy
is to be found scarcely in her picture galleries and
not at all in her cosmopolite hotels.
Central Italy is a paradise for the walker. I mean
the district between Rome and Bologna, Pisa and
Ancona, with Perugia for its headquarters, the place
where so many of the walking tours of Umbria,
Tuscany, and the Marches can be ended or begun. 1
^ The ordnance maps of Italy can be obtained by previous order at
London geographers, time allowed, or else bought in Milan or Rome — and
sometimes it is possible to get the local ordnance maps in smaller towns.
64 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
The "olive-sandalled Apennine" is a land always of
great views, and at frequent intervals of enchanting
detail. It is a land of hills and mountains, un-
enclosed, open in all directions to the wanderer at
will, unlike some British mountain game preserves.
And, even in the plains, the peasant, unlike some
south -English farmers, never orders you off his
ground, not even out of his olive grove or vineyard.
Only the vineyards in the suburbs of large towns
are concealed, reasonably enough, between high
white walls. The peasants are kind and generous
to the wayfarer. I walked alone in those parts with
great success before I knew more than twenty words
of Italian. The pleasure of losing your way on those
hills leads to a push over broken ground to a glimmer
of light that proves to come from some lonely farm-
stead, with the family gathered round the burning
brands, in honest, cheerful poverty. They will,
without bargain or demur, gladly show you the way
across the brushwood moor, till the lights of Gubbio
are seen beckoning down in the valley beneath.
And Italian towns when you enter them, though
it be at midnight, are still half awake, and every
one volunteers in the search to find you bed and
board.
April and May are the best walking months for
Italy. Carry water in a flask, for it is sometimes
ten miles from one well to the next that you may
chance to find. A siesta in the shade for three or
WALKING 6s
four hours in the midday heat, to the tune of cicada
and nightingale, is not the least pleasant part of
all ; and that means early starting and night walking
at the end, both very good things. The stars out
there rule the sky more than in England, big and
lustrous with the honour of having shone upon the
ancients and been named by them. On ItaUan
mountain tops we stand on naked, pagan earth,
under the heaven of Lucretius :
" Luna, dies, et nox, et noctis signa severa."
The chorus-ending from Aristophanes, raised every
night from every ditch that drains into the Medi-
terranean, hoarse and primaeval as the raven's croak,
is one of the grandest tunes to walk by. Or on a
night in May, one can walk through the too rare
Italian forests for an hour on end and never be out
of hearing of the nightingale's song.
Once in every man's youth there comes the hour
when he must learn, what no one ever yet believed
save on the authority of his own experience, that
the world was not created to make him happy. In
such cases, as in that of Teufelsdrockh, grim Walking's
the rule. Every man must once at least in life have
the great vision of Earth as Hell. Then, while his
soul within him is molten lava that will take some
lifelong shape of good or bad when it cools, let him
set out and walk, whatever the weather, wherever he
66 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
is, be it in the depths of London, and let him walk
grimly, well if it is by night, to avoid the vulgar
sights and faces of men, appearing to him, in his
then daemonic mood, as base beyond all endurance.
Let him walk until his flesh curse his spirit for
driving it on, and his spirit spend its rage on his
tlesh in forcing it still pitilessly to sway the legs.
Then the fire within him will not turn to soot and
choke him, as it chokes those who linger at home
with their grief, motionless, between four mean,
lifeless walls. The stricken one who has, more wisely,
taken to road and field, as he plies his solitary
pilgrimage day after day, finds that he has with him
a companion with whom he is not ashamed to share
his grief, even the Earth he treads, his mother who
bore him. At the close of a well-trodden day grief
can have strange visions and find mysterious
comforts. Hastening at droop of dusk through some
remote byway never to be found again, a man has
known a row of ancient trees nodding over a high
stone wall above a bank of wet earth, bending down
their sighing branches to him as he hastened past
for ever, to whisper that the place knew it all centuries
ago and had always been waiting for him to come
by, even thus, for one minute in the night.
Be grief or joy the companion, in youth and in
middle age, it is only at the end of a long and solitary
day's walk that I have had strange casual moments
of mere sight and feeling more vivid and less for-
WALKING 67
gotten than the human events of Hfe, moments like
those that Wordsworth has described as his common
companions in boyhood, hke that night when he was
rowing on Esthwaite, and that day when he was
nutting in the woods. These come to me only after
five-and-twenty miles. To Wordsworth they came
more easily, together with the power of expressing
them in words ! Yet even his vision and power
were closely connected with his long daily walks.
De Quincey tells us : "I calculate, upon good data,
" that with these identical legs Wordsworth must have
"traversed a distance of 175,000 or 180,000 English
"miles, a mode of exertion which to him stood in the
" stead of alcohol and all stimulants whatsoever to
" the animal spirits ; to which indeed he was indebted
" for a life of unclouded happiness, and we for much
" of what is most excellent in his writings."
There are many schools of Walking and none
of them orthodox. One school is that of the road-
walkers, the Puritans of the religion. A strain of
fine ascetic rigour is in these men, yet they number
among them at least two poets.^ Stevenson is par
excellence their bard :
" Boldly he sings, to the merry tune he marches."
It is strange that Edward Bowen, who wrote the
Harrow songs, left no walking songs, though he
^ Of the innumerable poets who were walkers we know too little to
judge how many of them were road walkers. Shakespeare, one gathers,
preferred the footpath way with stiles to either the high road or the moor.
68 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
himself was the king of the roads. Bowen kept
at home what he used to call his "road-map," an
index outline of the ordnance survey of our island,
ten miles to the inch, on which he marked his walks
in red ink. It was the chief pride of his life to cover
every part of the map with those red spider webs.
With this end in view he sought new ground every
holiday, and walked not merely in chosen hill and
coast districts but over Britain's dullest plains. He
generally kept to the roads, partly in order to cover
more ground, partly, I suppose, from preference for
the free and steady sway of leg over level surface
which attracts Stevenson and all devotees of the road.
He told me that twenty-five miles was the least
possible distance even for a slack day. He was
certainly one of the Ironsides.
To my thinking, the road-walkers have grasped
one part of the truth. The road is invaluable for
Wordsworth preferred the lower fell tracks, above the high roads and below
the tops of the hills. Shelley we can only conceive of as bursting over or
through all obstacles cross-country ; we know he used to roam at large
over Shotover and in the Pisan forest. Coleridge is known to have walked
alone over Scafell, but he also seems to have experienced after his own
fashion the sensations of night -walking on roads :
" Like one that on a lonesome road
Doth walk in fear and dread,
And having once turned round walks on
And turns no more his head ;
Because he knows a frightful fiend
Doth close behind him tread."
There is a "personal note" in that! Keats, Matthew Arnold, and
Meredith, there is evidence, were " mixed " walkers — on and off the road-
WALKING 69
pace and swing, and the ideal walk permits or even
requires a smooth surface for some considerable
portion of the way. On other terms it is hard to
cover a respectable distance, and the change of
tactile values under foot is agreeable.
But more than that I will not concede : twenty-five
or thirty miles of moor and mountain, of wood and
field-path, is better in every way than five-and-thirty
or even forty hammered out on the road. Early
in life, no doubt, a man will test himself at pace
walking and then of course the road must be kept.
Every aspiring Cantab, and Oxonian ought to walk
to the Marble Arch at a pace that will do credit to
the College whence he starts at break of day : ^ the
wisdom of our ancestors, surely not by an accident,
fixed those two seats of learning each at the same
distance from London, and at exactly the right
distance for a test walk. And there is a harder test
than that ; if a man can walk the eighty miles from
St. Mary Oxon. to St. Mary Cantab, in the twenty-
four hours, he wins his place with Bowen and a very
few more.
But it is a great mistake to apply the rules of
such test Walking on roads to the case of ordinary
Walking. The secret beauties of Nature are un-
veiled only to the cross-country walker. Pan would
not have appeared to Pheidippides on a road. On
* Start at five from Cambridge and have a second breakfast ordered
beforehand at Royston to be ready at eight.
70 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
the road we never meet the " moving accidents by
flood and field " : the sudden glory of a woodland
glade ; the open back-door of the old farmhouse
sequestered deep in rural solitude ; the cow routed
up from meditation behind the stone wall as we
scale it suddenly ; the deep, slow, south-country
stream that we must jump, or wander along to find
the bridge ; the northern torrent of molten peat-hag
that we must ford up to the waist, to scramble,
glowing warm-cold, up the farther foxglove bank ; the
autumnal dew on the bracken and the blue straight
smoke of the cottage in the still glen at dawn ; the
rush down the mountain side, hair flying, stones and
grouse rising at our feet ; and at the bottom the
plunge in the pool below the waterfall, in a place
so fair that kings should come from far to bathe
therein — yet is it left, year in year out, unvisited save
by us and "troops of stars." These, and a thousand
other blessed chances of the day, are the heart of
Walking, and these are not of the road.
Yet the hard road plays a part in every good walk,
generally at the beginning and at the end. Nor must
we forget the " soft " road, mediating as it were
between his hard artificial brother and wild sur-
rounding nature. The broad grass lanes of the low
country, relics of mediaeval wayfaring ; the green,
unfenced moorland road ; the derelict road already
half gone back to pasture ; the common farm track
— these and all their kind are a blessing to the walker,
WALKING 71
to be diligently sought out by help of map ^ and
used as long as may be. For they unite the speed
and smooth surface of the harder road with much
at least of the softness to the foot, the romance and
the beauty of cross-country routes.
It is well to seek as much variety as is possible
in twelve hours. Road and track, field and wood,
mountain, hill, and plain should follow each other
in shifting vision. The finest poem on the effect
of variation in the day's walk is George Meredith's
The Orchard and the Heath. Some kinds of country
are in themselves a combination of different delights,
as for example the sub-Lake district, which walkers
often see in Pisgah-view from Bowfell or the Old
Man, but too seldom traverse. It is a land, sounding
with streams from the higher mountains, itself com-
posed of little hills and tiny plains covered half by
hazel woods and heather moors, half by pasture and
cornfields ; and in the middle of the fields rise lesser
islands of rocks and patches of the northern jungle
still uncleared. The districts along the foot of moun-
tain ranges are often the most varied in feature and
therefore the best for Walking.
Variety, too, can be obtained by losing the way —
a half-conscious process, which in a sense can no
more be done of deliberate purpose than falling in
^ Compass and coloured half-inch Bartholomew is the walker's vade-
mecum in the North ; the one-inch ordnance is more desirable for the more
enclosed and less hilly south of England.
72 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
love. And yet a man can sometimes very wisely let
himself drift, either into love, or into the wrong path
out walking. There is a joyous mystery in roaming
on, reckless where you are, into what valley, road or
farm chance and the hour is guiding you. If the
place is lonely and beautiful, and if you have lost all
count of it upon the map, it may seem a fairy glen, a
lost piece of old England that no surveyor would
find though he searched for it a year. I scarcely
know whether most to value this quality of aloofness,
and magic in country I have never seen before and
may never see again, or the familiar joys of Walking-
grounds where every tree and rock are rooted in the
memories that make up my life.
Places where the fairies might still dwell lie for the
most part west of Avon. Except the industrial plain
of Lancashire the whole West from Cornwall to
Carlisle is, when compared to the East of our island,
more hilly, more variegated, and more thickly strewn
with old houses and scenes unchanged since Tudor
times. The Welsh border, on both sides of it, is good
ground. If you would walk away for a while out of
modern England, back and away for twice two
hundred years, arrange so that a long day's tramp
may drop you at nightfall off the Black Mountain
onto the inn that nestles in the ruined tower of old
Llanthony. Then go on through
" Clunton and Clunbury, Clungunford and Clun
The quietest places under the sun,"
WALKING 73
still sleeping their Saxon sleep, with one drowsy eye
open for the " wild Welsh " on the " barren mountains "
above. Follow more or less the line of Offa's Dyke,
which passes, a disregarded bank, through the remotest
loveliness of gorse-covered down and thick trailing
vegetation of the valley bottoms. Or if you are more
leisurely, stay a week at Wigmore till you know the
country round by heart. You will carry away much,
among other things considerable scepticism as to the
famous sentence at the beginning of the third chapter
of Macaulay's History: "Could the England of 1685
" be, by some magical process, set before our eyes, we
" should not know one landscape in a hundred, or one
"building in ten thousand." It is doubtful even now,
and I suspect that it was a manifest exaggeration
when it was written two generations ago. But
Macaulay was not much of a walker across country.^
One time with another, I have walked twice at least
round the coast of Devon and Cornwall, following for
the most part the white stones that mark the coast-
guard track along the cliff. The joys of this method
of proceeding have been celebrated by Leslie Stephen
in the paragraph quoted at the head of this essay.
But I note that he used to walk there in the summer,
when the heather was " purple." I prefer Easter for
that region, because when spring comes to conquer
our island he lands first in the South-west. That is
^ Like Shelley, he used to read as he walked. I do not think Mr.
Sidgwick would permit that !
74 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
when the gorse first smells warm on the cliff-top.
Then, too, is the season of daffodils and primroses,
which are as native to the creeks of Devon and Corn-
wall as the scalded cream itself. When the heather
is "purple " I will look for it elsewhere.
If the walker seeks variety of bodily motion, other
than the run down hill, let him scramble. Scramb-
ling is an integral part of Walking, when the high
ground is kept all day in a mountain region. To know
and love the texture of rocks we should cling to them ;
and when mountain ash or holly, or even the gnarled
heather root, has helped us at a pinch, we are thence-
forth on terms of affection with all their kind. No
one knows how sun and water can make a steep bank
of moss smell all ambrosia till he has dug foot, fingers,
and face into it in earnest. And you must learn to
haul yourself up a rock before you can visit those fern-
clad inmost secret places where the Spirit of the
Gully dwells.
It may be argued that scrambling and its elder
brother climbing are the essence of Walking made
perfect. I am not a climber and cannot judge. But
I acknowledge in the climber the one person who,
upon the whole, has not good reason to envy the
walker. On the other hand, those stalwart Britons
who, for their country's good, shut themselves up
in one flat field all day and play there, surrounded
by ropes and a crowd, may keep themselves well and
WALKING 75
happy, but they are divorced from nature. Shooting
does well when it draws out into the heart of nature
those who could not otherwise be induced to go there.
But shooters may be asked to remember that the
moors give as much health and pleasure to others
who do not carry guns. They may, by the effort of
a very little imagination, perceive that it is not well
to instruct their gamekeepers to turn every one off
the most beautiful grounds in Britain on those 350
days in the year when they themselves are not shoot-
ing. Their actual sport should not be disturbed, but
there is no sufficient reason for this dog-in-the-
manger policy when they are not using the moors.
The closing of moors is a bad habit that is spreading
in some places, though I hope it is disappearing in
others. It is extraordinary that a man not otherwise
selfish should prohibit the pleasures of those who
delight in the moors for their own sakes, on the off-
chance that he and his guests may kill another stag,
or a dozen more grouse in the year. And in most
cases an occasional party on the moor makes no
difference to the grouse at all. The Highlands have
very largely ceased to belong to Britain on account
of the deer, and we are in danger of losing the
grouse moors as well. If the Alps were British, they
would long ago have been closed on account of the
chamois.
The energetic walker can of course in many cases
despise notice-boards and avoid gamekeepers on the
76 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
moors, but I put in this plea on behalf of the majority
of holiday-makers, including women and children.
One would have thought that mountains as well as
seas were a common pleasure-ground. But let us
register our thanks to the many who do not close
their moors.
And the walker, on his side, has his social duties.
He must be careful not to leave gates open, not to
break fences, not to walk through hay or crops, and
not to be rude to farmers. In the interview, always
try to turn away wrath, and in most cases you will
succeed.
A second duty is to burn or bury the fragments
that remain from lunch. To find the neighbourhood
of a stream-head, on some well-known walking route
like Scafell, littered with soaked paper and the relics
of the feast is disgusting to the next party. And this
brief act of reverence should never be neglected, even
in the most retired nooks of the world. For all nature
is sacred, and in England there is none too much of it.
Thirdly, though we should trespass we should tres-
pass only so as to temper law w'ith equity. Private
gardens and the immediate neighbourhood of in-
habited houses must be avoided or only crossed when
there is no fear of being seen. All rules may be thus
summed up : " Give no man, woman, or child just
''reason to complain of your passage."
If I have praised wine in Italy, by how much more
WALKING 77
shall I praise tea in England ! — the charmed cup that
prolongs the pleasure of the walk and often its actual
distance by the last, best spell of miles. Before
modern times there was Walking, but not the perfec-
tion of Walking, because there was no tea. They of
old time said, '' The traveller hasteth towards evening,"
but it was then from fear of robbers and the dark,
not from the joy of glad living as with us who swing
down the darkling road refreshed by tea. When they
reached the Forest of Arden, Rosalind's spirits and
Touchstone's legs were weary — but if only Corin
could have produced a pot of tea, they would have
walked on singing till they found the Duke at dinner.
In that scene Shakespeare put his unerring finger fine
on the want of his age — tea for walkers at evening.
Tea is not a native product, but it has become our
native drink, procured by our English energy at sea-
faring and trading, to cheer us with the sober courage
that fits us best. No, let the swart Italian crush his
grape ! But grant to me, ye Muses, for heart's ease,
at four o'clock or five, wasp-waisted with hunger and
faint with long four miles an hour, to enter the open
door of a lane-side inn, and ask the jolly hostess if
she can give me three boiled eggs with my tea — and
let her answer "yes." Then for an hour's perfect
rest and recovery, while I draw from my pocket some
small, well-thumbed volume, discoloured by many
rains and rivers, so that some familiar, immortal
spirit may sit beside me at the board. There is true
78 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
luxury of mind and body ! Then on again into the'
night if it be winter, or into the dusk falling or still
but threatened — joyful, a man remade.
Then is the best yet to come, when the walk is
carried on into the night, or into the long, silent,
twilight hours which in the northern summer stand
in night's place. Whether I am alone or with one
fit companion, then most is the quiet soul awake ;
for then the body, drugged with sheer health, is felt
only as a part of the physical nature that surrounds
it and to which it is indeed akin; while the mind's
sole function is to be conscious of calm delight.
Such hours are described in Meredith's Night Walk :
*' A pride of legs in motion kept
Our spirits to their task meanwhile,
And what was deepest dreaming slept :
The posts that named the swallowed mile;
Beside the straight canal the hut
Abandoned ; near the river's source
Its infant chirp ; the shortest cut ;
The roadway missed were our discourse ;
At times dear poets, whom some view
Transcendent or subdued evoked . . .
But most the silences were sweet T^
Indeed the only reason, other than weakness of
the flesh, for not always walking until late at night,
is the joy of making a leisurely occupation of the
hamlet that chance or whim has selected for the
night's rest. There is much merit in the stroll after
supper, hanging contemplative at sunset over the
WALKING 79
little bridge, feeling at one equally with the geese
there on the common and with the high gods at
rest on Olympus. After a day's walk everything has
twice its usual value. Food and drink become
subjects for epic celebration, worthy of the treatment
Homer gave them. Greed is sanctified by hunger
and health. And as with food, so with books. Never
start on a walking tour without an author whom you
love. It is criminal folly to waste your too rare hours
of perfect receptiveness on the magazines that you
may find cumbering the inn. No one, indeed, wants
to read long after a long walk, but for a few minutes,
at supper or after it, you may be in the seventh
heaven with a scene of Henry 7V, a chapter of
Carlyle, a dozen "Nay, Sirs" of Dr. Johnson, or
your own chosen novelist. Their wit and poetry
acquire all the richness of your then condition, and
that evening they surpass even their own gracious
selves. Then, putting the volume in your pocket,
go out, and godlike watch the geese.
On the same principle it is good to take a whole
day off in the middle of a walking tour. It is easy
to get stale, yet it is a pity to shorten a good walk
for fear of being tired next day. One day off in a
well-chosen hamlet, in the middle of a week's "hard,"
is often both necessary to the pleasure of the next
three days, and good in itself in the same kind of
excellence as that of the evening just described. All
day long, as we lie perdu in wood or field, we have
8o CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
perfect laziness and perfect health. The body is
asleep like a healthy infant — or, if it must be doing
for one hour of the blessed day, let it scramble a
little ; while the powers of mind and soul are at
their topmost strength and yet are not put forth,
save intermittently and casually, like a careless giant's
hand. Our modern life requires such days of " anti-
worry," and they are only to be obtained in perfection
when the body has been walked to a standstill.
George Meredith once said to me that we should
" love all changes of weather." That is a true word
for walkers. Change in weather should be made
as welcome as change in scenery. "Thrice blessed
is our sunshine after rain." I love the stillness of
dawn, and of noon, and of evening, but I love no
less the "winds austere and pure." The fight against
fiercer wind and snowstorm is among the higher
joys of Walking, and produces in shortest time the
state of ecstasy. Meredith himself has described
once for all in the Egoist the delight of Walking
soaked through by rain. Still more in mist upon
the mountains, to keep the way, or to lose and
find it, is one of the great primaeval games, though
now we play it with map and compass. But do
not, in mountain mist, "lose the way" on purpose,
as I have recommended to vary the monotony of
less exciting walks. I once had eight days' walking
alone in the Pyrenees, and on only one half-day
saw heaven or earth. Yet I enjoyed that week in
WALKING 8 1
the mist, for I was kept hard at work finding the
unseen way through pine forest and gurgling Alp,
every bit of instinct and hill-knowledge on the stretch.
And that one half-day of sunlight, how I treasured
it ! When we see the mists sweeping up to play
with us as we walk the mountain crests, we should
"rejoice," as it was the custom of Cromwell's soldiers
to do when they saw the enemy. Listen while you
can to the roar of waters from behind the great grey
curtain, and look at the torrent at your feet tumbling
the rocks down gully and glen, for there will be no
such sights and sounds when the mists are with-
drawn into their lairs, and the mountain, no longer
a giant half seen through clefts of scudding cloud,
stands there, from scree-foot to cairn, dwarfed and
betrayed by the sun. So let us " love all changes
of weather."
I have now set down my own experiences and
likings. Let no one be alarmed or angry because
his ideas of Walking are different. There is no
orthodoxy in Walking. It is a land of many paths
and no-paths, where every one goes his own way
and is right.
GEORGE MEREDITH
On Mafeking night a Briton of the older school was
found roaming about in the quiet streets behind
Westminster Abbey, and sorrowfully exclaiming, at
intervals between the yelpings of six millions of his
more festive countrymen, " We're getting Frenchi-
fied ! We're getting Frenchified ! " The city-bred
Englishman of to-day is certainly more light in hand
than the Briton immortalised by Gillray. If that
artist has not libelled both us and our lively
neighbours, we were then strong, brutal, and stupid
like bulls, while the French were clever, silly, and
nasty like apes. The apes had their guillotine and
the bulls had their prize-ring. To-day the contrast
is less striking. The lower forms of our popular
reading and of our stage (I will not say of our
literature and drama) would seem to be composed
for the delight of a bull-ape, wonderfully blending
much that is least admirable in both beasts. But in
the higher forms of art the " Frenchifying" has done
us good : the union of Paris and the Five Towns
has been blessed with a notable progeny. But our
own "Celtic Fringe" has done even more than
GEORGE MEREDITH 83
France to stir our sluggish blood, in literature, drama,
and life.
It was a custom of George Meredith to boast of
his Welsh-Irish origin. Yet, to quote his own words,
" it is England nourishing, England protecting him,
" England clothing him in the honour he wears."
He devoted his wild Celtic imagination to the praise
of the English landscape, and his Celtic wit to the
comedy of English society. Luckily for us Saxons,
there was no Abbey Theatre when he started author,
so we took him to ourselves, or, more exactly, he
gave himself to us. It is because he is a Celt that
his style is that unruly compound of wit and poetry,
grotesque fun and tragedy, borne along on a perpetual
flood of metaphors and similes, following each other
fast as the waves of the sea. The river of his genius
drew its source from those distant mountain springs
whence flowed the Welsh and Irish legends, the
speech of the peasants in Synge's plays, the fantastic
fun of such a book as the Crock of Gold. But unlike
the other Celts, Meredith joined himself to our
larger English world, to show us our follies and to
glorify our most distinctive virtues ; to gibbet for
us our own Willoughby ; to exhibit in all their worth
our Vernons, our Roses, our Janets, and our Beau-
champs ; to teach our raw Wilfreds and Evans the
true choice of the path between duty and egoism,
love and sentimentality ; to make our English land-
scape glow with a redoubled glory, and to people
84 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
it with our Richards and Lucies ; to make our English
days and nights, dewy fields and nightingale-haunted
thickets, breathe into our hearts our old fighting faith
that life is well worth the living. Such are the uses
to which this Celtic poet has turned his gifts of wild
vision and of winged words. All this Walpurgis
night of the intellect and imagination to show us
plain Vernon Whitford ! All the wonder and
wealth of the Hall of Aklis, to turn the barber's con-
ceited young nephew into a true man ! Diana to fall
at last into the arms of Tom Redworth ! Surely none
but we English, to whom, in the words of one of
our preachers, *' conduct is three-fourths of life,"
would hold such a set of conclusions to be anything
but lame and impotent. It is to be observed that
they contented Meredith.
Thus, with an imagination so brilliant as to verge
sometimes on the insane, he preaches truest sanity.
He stands for morality and the serious study of
conduct, for the social order and the social spirit.
Even his Essay on Comedy turns upon these themes.
The need is felt of such a man. Our great modern
writers are more interested in analysis for its own
sake, hke Mr. Henry James, or in new ideas and
plenty of them, like Mr. Shaw, than in character and
in the conduct of life as we find it. But the problem
of character — what it is and how it is to be obtained
— was of prime interest to Meredith. And he has
more Hght to throw on the problem of conduct than
GEORGE MEREDITH 85
had Carlyle or Tolstoi. In Sartor Resartus there is
an immense force, which renders it an inspiration
to youth in trouble for all ages to come ; but there
is more inspiration than guidance. Tolstoi again, at
least in his old age, seemed to consider conduct in
its narrowest sense 2.sfour parts of life, and proposed
to sacrifice at its shrine literature, art, and the in-
nocent pleasures.^ Tolstoi, like so many of his
countrymen, is an irruption of the fifth into the
twentieth century. But Meredith knows well the
essential place in any true scheme of morality of
those
"Pleasures that through blood run sane,
Quickening spirit from the brain."
He links up the old Puritan in us with the modern
moralist of a broader and more rational school.
This Celtic Englishman has made us feel the poetic
beauty of life, not only on the solitary hills of Wales
or Ireland, but in the heart of civilised life, wherever
there is effort made, however blindly, to live it well.
Most Celtic poetry is a pure rushing stream, yet it
turns no wheel. But the great flood that Meredith
has guided turns tha wheels of our daily life in
* The effect of Tolstoi's teachings is sometimes startling. I was told in
Italy the following story about a devotee of Shakespeare who was going
round lecturing on the bard. He was billed to lecture at a certain Italian-
speaking university, but he could not go there, being warned that the
students had sworn to do him grievous bodily injury, if he ventured to
appear. The young gentlemen, it seemed, had been reading Tolstoi, and
had learnt irom the Russian prophet that Shakespeare was all wrong. I
was told this as true : it is at any rale ben trovalo.
86 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
England. The solitudes of nature fill that true Irish
poet, Mr. Yeats, with an added horror of London
and its "pavements grey" by contrast with his "bee-
loud glade" in Innisfree. The solitudes of nature
are no less the breath of life to Meredith, but they
fill him, not with a horror of London, but with a
desire to return to its strife, where also Nature is to
be seen at her eternal work of creation, no less than
in the fields, only moved onto a more intellectual
plane by the evolution of man. (Perhaps if Meredith
had really lived in London he would have liked it as
Uttle as Mr. Yeats ; but that is neither here nor there.)
In two of his noblest poems of nature, the Thrush in
February and the Lark Ascending, those birds send
him back in thought to London and its "heroes
many." So, too, in an early and less well-known
poem addressed to his friend Captain Maxse, he de-
scribes his thoughts by the side of an Alpine torrent :
" The old grey Alp has caught the cloud,
And the torrent river sings aloud ;
The glacier-green Rosanna sings
An organ song of its upper springs.
Foaming under the tiers of pine,
I see it dash down the dark ravine,
And it tumbles the rocks in boisterous play,
With an earnest will to find its way.
Sharp it throws out an emerald shoulder,
And, thundering ever of the mountain,
Slaps in sport some giant boulder,
And tops it in a silver fountain.
A chain of foam from end to end,
GEORGE MEREDITH 87
And a solitude so deep, my friend.
You may forget that man abides
Beyond the great mute mountain-sides.
Yet to me, in this high-walled solitude
Of river and rock and forest rude,
The roaring voice through the long white chain
Is the voice of the world of bubble and brain.
I find it where I sought it least ;
I sought the mountain and the beast,
The young thin air that knits the nerves,
The chamois ledge, the snowy curves ;
Earth in her whiteness looking bold
To Heaven for ever as of old.
And lo ! if I translate the sound
Now thundering in my ears around,
'Tis London rushing down a hill.
Life, or London ; which you will !
How often will these long lines of foam
Cry to me in my English home.
To nerve me, whenever I hear them bellow
Like the smack of the hand of a gallant fellow ! "
We find from one of his letters in the recently
published collection, that these lines on the Rosanna
were inspired by a likeness which he conceived
between the Tyrolese river and his English friend at
home, the original of Beauchamp. " The Rosanna,"
he writes to Captain Maxse, " put me in mind of you
" — nay, sang of you with a mountain voice, some-
" how, I don't know how. Perhaps because it is both
" hearty and gallant, subtle and sea-green. You never
"saw so lovely a brawling torrent."
88 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
It is always so with Meredith. The inspiring
touches of his portraits of men and women come
when he has them "anew in Nature dipped." The
characters in his novels put on their full grandeur or
charm only when they stand in direct contact with
Nature : Vernon Whitford in his sleep under the
wild white cherry tree ; Diana by the mountain pool
above the Italian lake ; Beauchamp at sea or under the
Alps at dawn ; Ottilia at sea or in the thunderstorm :
Emilia by Wilming Weir or in the moonlit fir-tree
glade ; Carinthia Jane when she goes out to "call the
morning" in her mountain home; Lucy by the
plunging weir, amid the bilberries, long grass, and
meadowsweet. It is at such moments, not when
they are bandying epigrams in the drawing-room,
that they leave their eternal impression upon us.
And Richard Feverel learns the lesson of life — too
late, it is true — on his walk through the thunderstorm
at night in Rhineland, when he feels all Nature
drinking in the glad rain.
Thus it is in the novels. And most of Meredith's
finest poems are inspired by this connection of human
life and passion with the life of nature. It is so in
the two greatest poems he ever wrote, The Day of the
Daughter of Hades 2Lnd Love in the Valley. Once, in
his old age, he was talking in a slighting manner of
Love in the Valley, placing it below other more didactic
poems in which he took an interest obstinate in pro-
portion to the world's refusal to be taught by them.
GEORGE MEREDITH 89
I expostulated, and to humour him in his love of
doctrine, suggested that Love in the Valley gave us
human passions inspired by the contact with Nature.
This seemed to please him, and he replied : " Well,
perhaps it has something of down there in it " — point-
ing through the floor — not at the nether regions, I
presume, but at his mother Earth " down there." All
his best work comes from "down there," or at least
from "out there" on the right side of door and
window. Within the four walls of the drawing-room
he often gets wearisome. I confess I dread the entry
of Lady Busshe and Lady Culmer, and sometimes
(low be it spoken) of Mrs. Mount Stewart herself, and
before their invading presence would fain rush out
with Crossjay into the woods, whither Vernon always
slinks away with a pipe and book when the front
door bell rings, if he has not already started off on a
thirty-mile walk.
In this preference for the outdoor to the indoor
Meredith, I differ from one whose perceptions of
literature were very much finer than my own. But I
still have the courage of my opinion, because I dis-
agree with Verrall's estimate of George Meredith not
as to anything that he has said but on the point of
his omission to notice the element of imagination or
poetry in the novels. The essay to which I refer is
printed at the end of Verrall's posthumous volume.
Literary Essays, Classical and Modern. All lovers of
literature or of scholarship should buy that volume
90 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
and cherish it, reading first the memoir of Verrall at
the beginning if they would draw inspiration from the
living picture of a man far greater in powers of mind
and in perfection of character than many world-
famous saints and sages. Of the classical essays that
occupy the middle part of the volume I can say
nothing except that they entrance the mind of the
layman. But the last two pieces, which have added
something new to the development of English literary
criticism, are on the subject of Scott and Meredith.
Here at least I am not disqualified for full enjoyment
by ignorance of the subject.
One half of Meredith's prose, his wit, is here
analysed and appraised by Verrall once and for ever.
But the other half of his prose, namely the poetry
of it, is ignored. If Verrall's definition of George
Meredith is accepted as the last word — as might
well happen, for do we not all " leave off talking
when we hear a master play " — then it would be a
very incomplete Meredith, a man dexterous in the
manipulation of language, but nothing more, who
would become traditional with posterity.
The following passages from Verrall's essay on
Meredith are supremely well said and true — except
that they make no mention of the poetic element,
and by implication rule it out :
" What may safely and rightly be said is that,
<' if we do not take pains to appreciate Meredith so
'*far as may be possible for us, we miss the best
GEORGE MEREDITH 91
"chance that Englishmen have, or ever had, to
" cultivate a valuable faculty which is of all least
" natural to us. This faculty is wit — wit in the sense
" which it bore in our ^Augustan ' age of Pope and Prior "^
" and should always bear if it is to be definite enough
" for utility : — wit or subtlety, on the part of the artist,
" in the manipulation of meanings, and on the part
" of the recipient or critic the enjoyment of such
" subtlety for its own sake, and as the source of a
"distinct intellectual pleasure."
" Now, since wit always makes a part, and a very
"large part, of Mr. Meredith's interest in his subject,
" whatever that subject may on the surface appear
" to be, and since — to repeat once more the only
"point on which I care to insist — the reader who does
" not appreciate linguistic dexterity, and does not rate
" it highly among human capacities, had much better
^^ let Mr. Meredith alone, it is well that on this point
"our attention should be challenged at once. Doubt-
"less there are many aspects in which Diana of the
" Crossways may be regarded. It is a study in the
" development of character ; it exhibits many pleasant
" pictures ; it has scenes, two at least, of elaborate
" and nevertheless effective pathos ; its plot turns
"upon the deep problem of marriage. In these
"matters among others, and especially in the last
"mentioned, it is possible, it may just now be
* The italics are my own.
92 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
"fashionable, to see the essential and most signifi-
"cant element. But none of these things are the
" essential — no, not the problem of marriage. If
"you want pathos, or pictures, or social problems,
"you can get them elsewhere, you will find them
" more easily elsewhere ; which is practically to say
"that you will find them better. What you have
" here is a touchstone which, were it not for other
" volumes from the same hand, would be in its kind
" unique among the products of England, to ascertain
"whether you have the faculty of enjoying dexterity
" in the manipulation of language ; this you have,
" and also an instrument with which to cultivate
"that faculty, if you happen to possess it."
The question, to my mind, is whether there is not
another quaUty as well as "wit" that raises Meredith's
novels to the place they hold. I quite agree that
"pathos," "pictures," and "social problems" can be
found elsewhere than in Meredith, as pathetic, as
pictorial, and as socially problematic. But in no
other novels, not even in Mr. Hardy's own, is the
element of poetry so strong. It is for this reason
that the " pathos " in the chapter of Diana where
the stricken heroine is comforted by her friend,
rises to something above the pathetic. For this
reason the " picture " of Diana beside the mountain
pool is a great deal more than pretty ; and often the
"social problem" itself is raised to the level of
poetry, as for instance in the passage quoted by
GEORGE MEREDITH 93
Verrall as an example of "wit" which seems to me
also an example of *' wit " inspired by poetry :
" With her, or rather with his thought of her soul,
" he understood the right union of women and men
" from the roots to the flowering heights of that rare
"graft. She gave him comprehension of the meaning
"of love — a word in many mouths, not often ex-
" plained. With her, wound in his idea of her, he
" perceived it to signify a new start in our existence,
"a finer shoot of the tree stoutly planted in good
"gross earth ; the senses running their live sap, and
" the minds companioned, and the spirits made one
" by the whole-natured conjunction. In sooth, a
" happy prospect for the sons and daughters of
" Earth, divinely indicating more than happiness :
" the speeding of us, compact of what we are, between
" the ascetic rocks and the sensual whirlpools, to
" the creation of certain nobler races, now very
"dimly imagined."
That is a wonderful piece of penmanship, as
Verrall points out ; but there is a poet behind the
pen.
Other novels of Meredith's are more poetical than
Diana. The Egoist indeed is first and foremost a
feast of "wit." But what of Vittoi-ia? There is
more than "linguistic dexterity" in the first page of
Vittoria, the view from Motterone ; — that passage, by
the way, Verrall admired and loved, thereby showing
that he was in fact far from insensible to those
94 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
qualities in Meredith that I call " poetical." The
scenes in the Milan opera house are the creation of
a poet. Harry Richmond s father is Falstaffian in
his proportions : that is, he moves in an atmosphere
where wit and farce are fired by poetic imagination.
The love scenes of Lucy and Richard are poetry ;
chapter xix. of Richard Feverel, entitled "A diversion
played on a penny whistle," is a poem and nothing
else at all. A hundred other scenes and a thousand
other phrases, scattered throughout the sometimes
wearisome psychology and often halting plot of the
novels, raise us into the finer air breathed by the
poet. There is no reason why we should not look
for poetry in a novel if it happens to be there. Mr.
Hardy's Return of the Native is, first and foremost,
an epic poem about a moor. Judged otherwise it
is a poor melodrama, but judged so it is immortal.
No doubt there are many passages in all our greatest
authors which are both " wit " and " poetry." The
dispute is partly, though not indeed entirely, a
question of nomenclature. Every poet must have
"wit" in the sense of "linguistic dexterity" or remain
a mute inglorious Milton. Even Wordsworth was
in this sense a "wit." It may be quite legitimate,
and even usefully suggestive, for once to call all
good poetry " wit." Most of Hamlet's remarks in
prose and verse display wit or linguistic dexterity
in the highest perfection ; and yet we commonly
call them "poetry," more especially such a passage
GEORGE MEREDITH 95
in prose as that beginning, " What a piece of work
is man ! " Of course in Ha^nlet the poetry and the
wit are both continuous. In Meredith both are
intermittent, and so far as they can be distinguished
one from the other, the poetry is more intermittent
than the wit. Yet it is the seasoning of poetry that
keeps many of his novels good to read. I therefore
propose an amendment to Verrall's sentence, which
should run as follows :
" The reader who does not appreciate either linguistic
" dexterity or poetry, and does not rate either of them
" highly among human capacities^ had better leave Mr.
" Meredith alone."
And this would be perfectly true even if he had
never written a line of verse. Meredith and Brown-
ing go together in our minds, because the merit
of both is the combination of poetry with " wit."
In the recently published letters of George Meredith
occurs a passage, one among many, which Verrall
would call " wit " but which I should call " poetry,"
and we should both be right. It is typical of
hundreds in his novels. Meredith is writing from
Italy to a friend in England who has fallen in
love :
" I have been in Venice. I have followed Byron's
" and Shelley's footsteps there on the Lido. I have
" seldom felt melancholy so strongly as when standing
"there. You know I despise melancholy, but the
"feeling came. I love both those poets; and with
96 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
" my heart given to them I felt as if I stood in a dead
" and useless time. So are we played with sometimes !
" At that hour your heart was bursting with a new
" passion, and the past was as smoke flitting away from
" a Hred-off old contemptible gtcn."
That last sentence, descriptive of the lover's state
of mind towards the past, is it to count as "wit" or
as poetry ? Surely it is both.
Or again, let us take two passages at random out
of Beauchamp's Career. They shall be of the very
texture of the story, not purple patches inserted
like chapter xix. of Richard Feverei. This is the first :
"Cecilia's lock of hair lying at Steynham hung
"in the mind. He saw the smooth, flat curl lying
"secret like a smile. And as when life rolls back
"on us after the long ebb of illness, little whispers
"and diminutive images of the old joys and prizes
" of life arrest and fill our hearts ; or as, to men who
" have been beaten down by storms, the opening of
" a daisy is dearer than the blazing orient which bids
"it open; so the visionary lock of Cecilia's hair
" became Cecilia's self to Beauchamp, yielding him as
"much of her as he could bear to think of, for his
" heart was shattered."
The other passage describes the delirium of fever.
Earl Romfrey, walking in the garden of Dr. Shrapnel's
house, hears the voice of Beauchamp raving :
" He heard the wild scudding voice imperfectly :
" it reminded him of a string of winter geese changing
GEORGE MEREDITH 97
"waters. Shower gusts, and the wail and hiss of
"the rows of fir trees bordering the garden, came
"between, and allowed him a moment's incredulity
"as to its being a human voice. Such a cry will
"often haunt the moors and wolds from above at
"nightfall. The voice hied on, sank, seemed swal-
" lowed ; it rose, as if above water, in a hush of wind
"and trees. The trees bowed their heads raging,
"the voice drowned; once more to rise, chattering
"thrice rapidly, in a high-pitched key, thin, shrill,
"weird, interminable, like winds through a crazy
"chamber-door at night." i
The value of these two passages is not wit but
poetry, and they are typical of Meredith the novelist.
Meredith's "Last Poems," like those of Browning,
Tennyson, and others, have interest because they
show what kind of spiritual profit he drew from old
age, and with what countenance he sat in the shadow
of death. Did earth grow dark and terrible to him
as he watched it from the sentinel chair to which
illness confined him in that last, long watch ?
Or did all our affairs grow far away, and dim and
foolish in the light of some higher reality drawing
near ? Did the new world of machines and mobs
and vulgarity that had grown up since his youth
seem to him at the last, as it did to Carlyle and to
Tennyson, just a bad mistake and nothing more, a
driving of the car of humanity into the ditch ? Or
98 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
did he, like Browning, fixing his eye on the curtain
behind which he himself was about to pass, "greet
the unseen with a cheer" ?
Meredith did none of these things. Although in
its hearty cheerfulness his attitude resembles that of
Browning more closely than that of Tennyson or
Carlyle, yet to him the unseen remains unseen, and
if he had his last thoughts on it he carried them
away with him. But, indeed, he had already said
what he had to say about death and the beyond, in
his earlier works, when he was more speculatively
interested in such questions. Only when the
question of death became personal to him, it ceased
to occupy his mind. It was many years before
that he had asked in a rapturous irony :
"Into the breast that gives the rose
Shall I with shuddering fall ? "
And then again he had written :
" If there is an eternal rest for us, it is best to
" believe that Earth knows, to keep near her, even in
" our utmost aspirations."
And there he left the matter, peacefully at rest.
During the long years when he waited with kindly
patience for death, he was entirely preoccupied with
fears and hopes, not for himself, but for the actual
world that he was to leave behind. Here, on Mother
Earth, would live the race of Man, with whom he
had, in his altruistic philosophy, absolutely identified
GEORGE MEREDITH 99
himself. And so we find that Meredith's " Last
Poems" are ahuost entirely concerned with — history
and politics ! There is no " Crossing the Bar," no
"Epilogue." With a characteristic touch of in-
dependence and dislike for curiosity, he squares his
own accounts with death in private. But he is
gravely concerned in these last poems with such
workaday questions as Home Rule and Conscription,
His last voice is raised to commemorate Nelson and
Garibaldi, and to proclaim sympathy with the struggle
for Russian freedom. There is a valour and a jollity
in this way of ending life that is infinitely touching,
in view of the grave, beautiful things that he had
formerly written about death in the fourteenth chapter
of Lord Ormont, and again and again in his other
novels; in ''The Ballad of Past Meridian," in the
"Faith on Trial," and in the sonnet on "A Friend
Lost."
No murmur or complaint was heard from this
athlete and lover of life, as he sat crippled alike by
disease and age. He was the man who had written,
" There is nothing the body suffers that the soul may
not profit by." His soul enriched itself with all the
pleasures and activities that his once splendid body
was now compelled to forgo. Youth never left him,
but became transformed into a gracious spiritual
repossession of youth's joys, by memory and by
seeing others enjoy them in their turn. He loved
the presence of the young, to hear how they fared
loo CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
in their work, and in the sane pursuit of Artemis
and Aphrodite. I have seen him watching the
esplanade from a seaside-lodging window. To most
of us it would have seemed a very ordinary lodging-
house window indeed, but to him, and to those who
heard him talk, it was a peephole on glorious life.
A girl passing on a bicycle set him prophesying the
fuller life that was now setting in for women. A
boy leading a pet goat up and down aroused his
envy and delight, made him again in spirit a boy,
a Crossjay. To listen to him was to be plunged by
Esculapius into the healing waters of youth.
There is only one intimate personal confession in
his last poems. It is a perfect expression of what
old age was to him, and what we may pray that
it will be to each of us. The poem is called Youth
in Age : —
" Once I was part of the music I heard
On the boughs or sweet between earth and sky,
For joy of the beating of wings on high
My heart shot into the breast of the bird.
I hear it now and I see it fiy
And a life in wrinkles again is stirred,
My heart shoots into the breast of the bird,
As it will for sheer love till the last long sigh."
POETRY AND REBELLION ^
When a foreign author, counted among the most
distinguished critics in Europe, has written a book
on a great period of our national poetry, it
is certain to contain some views not altogether
English, and therefore all the more instructive for
Englishmen. We have previously heard George
Brandes on Shakespeare : we have now the oppor-
tunity, thanks to this translation of a work which
appeared thirty years ago in the original Danish, to
hear him on that other poetical constellation which
has no central sun, but which, in its total force of
light and heat, perhaps rivals the Elizabethan — on
Wordsworth, Coleridge, Scott, Keats, Shelley, Byron,
and those lesser planets (the foils to their brightness),
Southey, Moore, Campbell, Landor. In these Mr.
Brandes finds his theme ; but the fiery comet Blake
apparently never swam into his ken.
If we had to give up either these or the Eliza-
bethans, there are some reasons, not indeed sufficient,
why we should prefer to part with Shakespeare.
1 Main Currents in Nineteenth Century Literature. George Brande*
IV. Naturalism in Engtand. (Heinemann. 1905.) (Translated from
Danish of 1875.) This essay is revised from an article which appeared in
the Indepettdent Review in 1905.
I02 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
They are six giants against one colossus. And
although the body of Shakespeare's work is left, he
himself is but dimly known to us, while the lives of
the moderns are as familiar as their poems. They
were fortunate in their friends, at least they were
posthumously fortunate in their friends' biographi-
cal powers ; the records of Hogg, Trelawny, De
Quincey, Lamb, Leigh Hunt, Lockhart, — and Keats'
and Byron's own letters, — show to what height
of beauty and power, if also at times of folly, it
has been possible for the human spirit to attain.
But no one looks to find such matter in the
gleanings which Mr. Sidney Lee has so scrupu-
lously gathered behind the harvest that time has
carried away. Further we suspect that even if we
knew him, Shakespeare, unlike his poetry, would
prove too perfect, too wise, and too bourgeois in
the best sense to have the picturesque charm of
the Inspired Charity Boy, the Ineffectual Angel or
the Pilgrim of Eternity. But this we shall never
know. For however many thousands of years our
civiHsation may last, neither we nor our remotest
descendants will ever see into the Mermaid Tavern.
Its doors are closed, its windows shuttered, Time Past
has got the key, and our scholars can only sweep
the doorstep.
Then, too, Shakespeare did not take part in the
Gunpowder Plot, or WTite satires on James and Cecil,
or sail with the Sea Beggars, or die defending
POETRY AND REBELLION 103
Rochelle. But the moderns, whether or not they
prove to be " for all time," were at least no small
part of their own stirring age. The times were great
and the literary gentlemen were not small. Their
alchemy has resolved each of the dark, hot and heavy
political passions of their own day into its corres-
ponding poetical essence. They are the Radicals
and the Tories of Eternity. They founded Pantiso-
cratic Societies and Quarterly Reviews. They were
stalked over the Quantock Hills by Pitt's spies, as
they plotted the downfall of Pope beside " the ribbed
sea sand." They sang of Highland clansmen and of
knights in armour, and poetic Toryism sprang on
to the stage, fully bedizened, out of Sir Walter's head.
Others of them defied the gods of the Holy Alliance,
concentrated on their own heads the whole weight
of tyranny's anathema, and rode down the Pisan
Lungarno in the face of Austria, England and Italy,
" Dower'd with the hate of hate, the scorn of scorn,
The love of love."
Four things, rarely united, combine to enhance
their story : great poetic genius ; great personal eccen-
tricity and power ; great principles come to issue
in poUtics ; and the picturesque surroundings of
the old world in its last generation of untarnished
beauty. Except Tolstoi with his smock and his
weather-beaten face, standing among the Russian
snows and revolutions, there has been no figure in
104 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
our own time that exerted the same sway over the
imagination of Europe. Even in the Victorian era,
our great poets paid their debt to society by inspecting
Board Schools instead of heading Mediterranean
revolutions. And so, for centuries to come, the eyes
of men somewhat weary with the dull drab of their
own generations, will be turned to the funeral pyre
on the shore of the blue Mediterranean, with the
marble mountains of Carrara behind, " touching the
air with coolness," the heart of hearts unconsumed
in the flame, and the doomed figure beside it looking
out to sea. The prayer of old Europe for liberty
and new life seems to rise up to the skies in that
sacrificial flame " waving and quivering with a bright-
ness of inconceivable beauty." ^ Such is the romance
that England once gave mankind, to show what
poetry she can create when her heart is turned for
a moment from the cares of the world to the things
of the imagination and the mind.
It is these outward suits and trappings of poetry —
its historical, political, and personal accidents — of
which Mr. Brandes' book gives a brilliant survey.
Not a paragraph is unmeaning or trite. His method
of treating the poetry itself is to analyse these external
accompaniments. He scarcely attempts to judge
the style but only the content ; he does not place
the writers in order of their merit as poets, but in
order of their effectiveness as revolutionaries. For
^ Leigh Hunt, Recollection!, p. 200.
POETRY AND REBELLION 105
instance, Wordsworth is introduced as the tyrannicide
who slew Pope, and led the exodus of the English
poets back to nature ; but he is cast aside, when
he invests himself in the "strait-jacket of orthodox
piety." That is Mr. Brandes' account of the matter,
where most people are content to say that Wordsworth
first wrote good poetry and then bad :
"Two voices are there : one is of the deep ;
And one is of an old half-witted sheep,
And, Wordsworth, both are thine."
Mr. Brandes makes it his task to appraise each
poet in turn, according as he adds some new element
to the rebellious growth of literary, religious or
political " naturalism." Wordsworth begins the re-
turn to nature ; Coleridge adds " naturalistic roman-
ticism " ; Scott " historical naturalism " ; Keats
"all-embracing sensuousness " ; Landor "republican
humanism " ; Shelley " radical naturalism " ; but Byron
is the " culmination of naturalism " and has seven
whole chapters to himself, while none of the com-
moners has more than two. Each new element is
analysed, each character and personality described
with an insight that never fails, and a sympathy
that fails only in the case of Wordsworth.
Now this method, which really consists in talking
all round the subject of poetry but never plucking
out its heart, is the best as a means of stimulating
io6 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
the love of poetry in the young, and of introducing
readers to a particular group of poets. It is in-
teresting, picturesque, alive. It gives the colour,
the setting, the intellectual formulas that contained
the poetic essence. But that essence it does not
attempt to define.
By thus limiting the range of his inquiry, Mr.
Brandes has saved himself from disaster, for we are
left with the impression that if he had told us which
were the best poems, we should have been asked
to regard Cain and Don Juan as the " culmination "
not only of "naturalism," but of English poetry.
Incidentally he lets it slip out that Burns was a
"much more gifted poet" than Wordsworth. But
these views are of no consequence, because not
obtruded. The brilliant and suggestive analysis of
the content, fortified by long and well-chosen quota-
tions, enable the reader to form his own judgment
on the style. Now one's own judgment on poetry
is the only judgment worth having, not because it is
necessarily right, but because it alone is strongly felt.
The value of the appreciation of poetry lies, not in
mere correctness of opinion, but in combined right-
ness and depth of feeling. Therefore the critic,
even if he were infallible, would do well to leave the
final judgment to the reader.
For these reasons, I believe that Mr. Brandes' book
is the best existing introduction to the poets and
poetry of this period as a whole. The errors of the
POETRY AND REBELLION 107
book are not such as could possibly deceive our
present literary public, while its truth would add
something new to their stock of ideas. It is only if
people understand what the system of political and
religious persecution was like when these poets were
young, that they can do justice to the merits, while
they detect the errors, of Mr. Brandes' book. What
was it (other than the law of marriage) against which
Shelley and Byron, as formerly Wordsworth and
Coleridge, declared themselves rebels ? What justi-
fication has Mr. Brandes for such language as this ? —
" The neutral qualities of the nation were educated
" into bad ones. Self-esteem and firmness were nursed
"into that hard-heartedness of the aristocratic, and
" that selfishness of the commercial classes which
" always distinguish a period of reaction ; loyalty was
"excited into servility, and patriotism into the hatred
" of other nations. And the national <5«(^ qualities were
" over-developed. The desire for outward decorum at
" any price, which is the shady side of the moral
" impulse, was developed into hypocrisy in the domain
" of morality ; and that determined adherence to the
"established religion, which is the least attractive
"outcome of a practical and not profoundly reasoning
" turn of mind, was fanned either into hypocrisy or
"active intolerance" (p. 16).
This is the picture, the "political background,"
which Mr, Brandes has sketched for his panorama.
Is it overcharged ? I think not ; but to show this
io8 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
I must call attention to a few facts not generally
emphasised in our historical text-books. And before
doing this, I will quote another passage, which clearly
shows that Mr. Brandes is not prejudiced against
England. He sees the faults of Englishmen, but
he admires the Englishman.
" Beneath that attachment to the soil, and that
"delight in encountering and mastering the fitful
" humours of the sea, which are the deep-seated causes
"of Naturalism, there is in the Englishman the still
"deeper-seated national feeling which, under the
" peculiar historical conditions of this period, naturally
" led the cleverest men of the day in the direction of
" Radicalism. No nation is so thoroughly penetrated
" by the feeling of personal independence as England.
" It took an Englishman to do what Byron did, stem
" alone the stream which flowed from the fountain of
"the Holy Alliance. . . . But an Englishman, too,
"was needed to fling the gauntlet boldly and defiantly
"in the face of his own people" (p. 12).
And Mr. Brandes appreciates no less warmly the
character of the Tory Scott, — all in him that was "racy
of the soil " of North Britain.
In the generation following 1792 Britain was not a
free country. The island was governed by a certain
number of privileged persons, and the bulk of the
inhabitants not only had no share of any sort in the
POETRY AND REBELLION 109
government, but they were debarred from demanding
a share, by laws specially enacted for this purpose
and savagely administered. In politics and religion,
a system like Strafford's " thorough " ruled the land
under the forms of Statute and Common Law.
This revived Straffordism had two periods of
activity : one in the last decade of the eighteenth
century, in the radical days of Coleridge and Words-
worth : the other after Waterloo, in the time of
Shelley and Byron. In the intervening years, 1800
to 181 5, British liberty, gagged by Pitt's previous
legislation, gave no sign of life ; and indeed every one
was preoccupied with the pressing danger of conquest
by Napoleon. After Waterloo came the second period
of conflict ; but then the Tory ministers were only
acting on the principles and re-enforcing the measures
of twenty years before. It is therefore to the earlier
period that we must look for the heroic age of tyranny,
when Burke, finding in the French Revolution a subject
as great as his own genius, first inspired our statesmen
with the un-English desire to prevent all further
development of religious and political thought, and to
root out the spirit of independence.
An agitation for Parliamentary Reform, begun by
the middle classes of Yorkshire in the 'eighties, had
spread, under the influence of the French Revolution,
to some of the lower classes in London ; these men
began, in 1793 and 1794, to hold orderly public meet-
ings in the suburbs, where speeches were delivered in
no CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
favour of Parliamentary Reform and of the new
principle of Democracy. Thereupon Acts were passed
enabling a single magistrate to disperse a meeting at
will, and making death the penalty for disobedience
to his orders. The result was that no one attempted
to hold such meetings again till after Waterloo. The
upper classes were mad, inevitably and perhaps ex-
cusably mad with fear of the French Revolution. In
their blind panic they saw Englishmen as Jacobins
walking.
They so little knew their countrymen and so little
understood the causes of what was going on in France
that they feared a repetition of the same phenomena
in this island, where there was neither the fuel nor
the fire for such a conflagration. Pitt put a stop even
to lectures given by his opponents, and soon after-
wards Political Associations and Trade Unions
were universally suppressed by law. All Liberal
politicians, except the few who held seats in Parlia-
ment, were driven back into private life, and even
there they were followed by government spies —
sinister figures unfamiliar to the freeborn Englishman,
but evoked by the passions of that unhappy time.
Meanwhile the Press was effectually gagged, for the
juries readily sent publishers to prison, at the dicta-
tion of the law officers of the crown. The demand
for Parliamentary Reform was punished in Scotland
by transportation, in England by imprisonment for
sedition. Under this treatment it ceased to make
POETRY AND REBELLION iii
itself heard before the century of enlightenment
closed in darkness and in fear.i
Such was the system which Fox denounced as
destructive to "the spirit, the fire, the freedom, the
boldness, the energy of the British character, and
with them its best virtue." The man who used this
language was more truly a Briton than the ministers
who sent spies to betray the private conversation of
their countrymen, and taught the English for a while
to abase their spirit like the tame nations who fawned
on Napoleon and Metternich. Fox " a Briton died,"
but he also lived a Briton : his traducers, who then
and since have assumed to themselves all the
"patriotic" virtues, did not seem to understand that
to be a Briton means to speak your mind without
fear.
The measures of coercion, as Mr. Brandes points
out, killed independence of character and made an
end of the free play of intellect and imagination.
The revival, twenty years later, could only be effected
by violent, and not altogether wholesome, literary
stimulants. And if Byron attacked morality as well
as despotism, he had at least been provoked to this
unfortunate conflict by the hypocrisy which had long
pretended, for party purposes, that morals were the
^ So abject was the terrorism produced by the prosecutions that in 179S
even honest old Major Cartwright, " the father of constitutional re-
formers," could not get any publisher to take his word in favour of
Parliamentary Keform, but had to "hire a shop and servant" to sell it.
See Mock and Constitutional Keform (1810), p. 47.
112 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
peculiar preserve of orthodoxy and Toryism. The
whole movement of coercion had been a religious
movement, as can be seen in the government writers
from Burke and the Anti-Jacobin downwards. There
was much that was noble in the evangelicalism that
defied Napoleon and afterwards freed the slave. But,
closely connected with this, and often indistinguish-
able from it, was religion in its most odious form, not
a moral influence, but an influence pretending to a
monopoly in morals ; not a martyr defying the strong,
but an inquisitor punishing the weak. An attempt
was made, with considerable success, to eradicate the
very slight traces of free thought then observable in
England, and to reduce by persecution the power
even of orthodox dissent. A few examples will serve
to illustrate the spirit of the system.
Paine's Age of Reason, an argument grounding
religion on Deism and the belief in Immortality, was
directed equally against the Atheism then prevalent
in France, and the Biblical literalism then universal
in England ; it was highly moral and earnest in its
tone, but sometimes violent in its language against
the ethics of the Old Testament and the miraculous
elements in the New. In 1797 an English publisher
of this work, Williams by name, was prosecuted by the
Society for the Suppression of Vice and Immorality.
Williams was himself a Christian ; he had a large
family ; he was abjectly poor ; he repented, and he
begged, after the case had gone against him, that
POETRY AND REBELLION 113
Wilberforce and his Committee of Bishops would not
bring him up for judgment. This prayer was urged
on humanitarian grounds by Erskine, on this occa-
sion counsel for the prosecution, who had found his
victim stitching tracts in a wretched little room, where
his children were suffering with small-pox. But the
godly men were " firm," as Wilberforce boasts in his
diary, and proceeded to ruin the miserable family in
the name of Christ. If this was the spirit of Wilber-
force, when impelled by fanaticism, we can imagine
what was the spirit of less humane men. Twenty
years later, times had not changed ; for in the year
of Peterloo, Richard Carlile, his wife and shop assis-
tants, were imprisoned for republishing Paine's A^e
of Reason.
Meanwhile the campaign of slander was carried on
in the alleged interests of morality. One instance will
suffice, from the very highest type of Tory literature —
the Beauties of the Anti-facobin (1799). In a note on
Canning's wittiest poem. The New Morality, we read
that Coleridge " has now quitted the country, become
a citizen of the world, left his little ones fatherless,
and his wife destitute. Ex uno disce his associates
Southey and Lambe " {sic). Here is Anti-Jacobin accu-
racy and logic in a nutshell. In the cause of religion
and morality a lie is told — that Coleridge in 1799 had
deserted his wife and children. In the next sentence
the deduction is made. It is stated that Southey and
Lamb, because they associate with a Unitarian and
H
114 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
radical like Coleridge, may be pilloried as the sort of
people who desert their wives and children. Society
is duly warned against a scoundrel like Charles Lamb !
He is the sort of person who breaks up family life !
Priestley was a scientist of European reputation,
and a Unitarian of the biblical school, an avowed
opponent of Paine and the Deists. He was driven
from the country by the social persecution roused
against him by the clergy and the " Church and
King" mob, who would not suffer a Socinian to
live in England. And if Priestley had to retire to
America, we can imagine how unendurable life was
made to his humbler followers. Nor were orthodox
dissenters under cover. Not only did nonconformists
remain excluded from the Universities and from
numerous civil rights, but a social persecution was
now directed against them ; some were forced to
abandon their business in the towns and to fly to
America, while the position of dissenters on the
estates of Tory landowners was often rendered un-
tenable. To this persecution it was the design of
the Cabinet in the year 1800 to give legislative force.
The design to go back on the Toleration Act of
1688 so far got a hold of Pitt's mind that he was
only diverted from his purpose by the appeals of
Wilberforce. The hypocrites and formalists were
stopped from further progress on the path of perse-
cution by the man of real religion. For Wilberforce,
while he pursued Deism with the sharpest edge of
POETRY AND REBELLION 115
the law, while he stirred up the educated classes to
regard Priestley's views with a horror of which their
Laodicean ancestors had been innocent, knew that
the Gospel had true though erring friends in the
orthodox nonconformists. He therefore checked the
design, which would, as he said, at once have filled
the gaols with the best of the dissenting ministers.
But that the Cabinet should have seriously considered
such iniquity, shows what was the spirit of the age.
The legal persecution of nonconformity had been
suggested to Pitt by Bishop Pretyman,^ the type
of the clergyman of that day, hostile to every earnest
movement within the Church, whether evangelical
or other, but stringent to put down the unorthodox
and the dissenters by law, and shameless in the
pursuit of the loaves and fishes. He finally made
use of his position as Pitt's old tutor and friend
to ask his pupil to make him Archbishop of Canter-
bury ; 2 the best use of the prerogative ever made by
George III was to veto this scandalous job. In Ireland
the Bishops added open vice to the characteristics
of their English brethren. "In the north," wrote
the Primate of Ireland in 1801, "I have six bishops
under me. Three are men of tolerable moral charac-
ter, but are inactive and useless, and two are of
acknowledged bad character. Fix Mr. Beresford at
Kilmore and we shall then have three very inactive
1 Life of Wilberforce, ii. pp. 360-5.
2 Rose's Diaries, ii. pp. 82-9.
ii6 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
bishops, and, what I trust the world has not yet
seen, three bishops in one district reported to be
the most profligate men in Europe." ^ At Kilmore
Mr. Beresford was duly fixed.
Such was the Church which in the name of morality
urged the State to suppress every movement of
thought. For the cry had been raised which used
most easily to appeal to the English ear, that the
foundations of morality were m danger. In the full
eighteenth century the governing class had been
openly profligate, and some of George Ill's favourite
ministers had been among the worst. That caused
no alarm. But when democracy showed its head,
the Tories became the patrons, though not always
the examples, of morality. The silly marriage theory
promulgated by the philosopher Godwin, gave his
enemies their cue. Family life was being undermined
by the Jacobins ! If the standard of English morals
was not high the continental standard was lower still,
and it was easy therefore for our alarmists to call
attention to the continental standard, and to ascribe
to the teaching of Jacobinism evils that had been
rampant in the days of Louis XIV. Canning's satires
are full of this idea ; and one of the most distin-
guished men of learning in the United Kingdom
solemnly wrote a book to prove that Frederick
William II of Prussia was the saviour of social
morality, because he had suppressed free thought
* MacDonagh, The Viceroys Post-Bag, p. 99.
POETRY AND REBELLION 117
in his dominions by force ; Frederick William, religi-
ous mystic and voluptuary, who even in his de-
bauches never forgot to be pious, and who caused
the Lutheran clergy solemnly to legalise and sanctify
his bigamy ! ^ With Frederick William thus recog-
nised by the Tories as a saviour of society, we can
understand why Byron afterwards plunged to the
assault of throne, altar and hearth together.
Hypocrisy was the order of the day. The word
" freedom " was, by a masterpiece of irony, retained
in the official cant. When Pitt introduced his Sedi-
tious Meetings Bill into the House, he spoke large
words on the undoubted right of the people to that
freedom of speech of which the measure was designed
to deprive them. "The perfect freedom, civil and
religious, which we enjoy in this happy country," be-
came the cant phrase of the persecutors. Even Scotch
writers, the countrymen of Muir and Palmer, in books
written to argue that religious persecution is a duty
of the State, could talk of our Constitution as one
in which each man sits "under his own vine, and
under his own fig-tree, and there is none to make
him afraid." 2 Language like this has to a large
extent imposed upon posterity, but it goaded con-
temporaries like Byron to madness.
^ Proofs of Conspiracy, Robinson, 1797 (dedicated to Secretary
Windham), pp. 90-2, 276, 283, 316-7. For the private life and public
policy of Frederick William II, see Sorel, V Europe et la K&v. Fr. /.,
478-496.
* Proofs of Conspiracy, pp. 94, 446.
ii8 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
Another form of hypocrisy was to inveigh perpetu-
ally against the cruelties exercised by the French
revolutionists as being the peculiar results of liberal
principles, while our allies, the despots, were perpetra-
ting like acts in Poland without even a shadow of
excuse, and threatening them against France in
Brunswick manifestos ; and while we ourselves were
torturing the Irish by flogging and pitchcapping as a
regular system. The torture was condoned over here,
just as the Terror was condoned in France, as being
the only means of self-preservation in time of deadly
peril. Whether massacre without torture, or torture
reduced to a system, be the worst, it is for casuists
to decide. But whereas Robespierre and Carrier
of Nantes paid the penalty of their crimes at the
hands of their fellow revolutionists as soon as the
worst danger of civil war and invasion had passed,
Judkin Fitzgerald was shielded by special Act of
Parliament from the natural legal consequence of
his crimes, and was raised to the Honourable
Order of Baronets. That men who condoned and
rewarded Fitzgerald should accuse the Jacobins of
inhumanity, is the kind of thing that astounds those
who have not been brought up in the English tradi-
tion. And it has not escaped Mr. Brandes.^
This system of hypocrisy and tyranny, in the course
of its long struggle with the yet more tyrannical
^ Brandes, pp. 154-5. Lecky, History of England, ed. 1890, viii. pp.
22-30. State Trials, xxvii. pp. 759-820.
POETRY AND REBELLION 119
though possibly more useful revolutionary govern-
ments of France, successfully smothered the first
stirrings of radical and free thought. The appalling
failure of the French Revolution to establish liberty
turned over Coleridge, Wordsworth, Southey and
many others to join the reaction here. Fox died.
Then came Waterloo and the restoration of the ancien
regime throughout the European world. Thereupon
Radicalism in England again attempted to lift its
head, jstung by the economic miseries of the mass
of the people, but was stamped down once more by
repressive measures associated in the minds of the
victims with the name of Castlereagh, who introduced
the "Six Acts" into the House of Commons. That
was the era when Byron's poetry suddenly became
a force in politics.
I have set down these few facts to explain what
Mr. Brandes calls " the political background " of his
book, and to justify the high importance and value
which he attaches to Byron's place in history. The
true splendour of Byron lay in his instinct to re-
bellion, in which the pride of the aristocrat and the
self-assertion of the egoist against the society that
rebukes him were compounded with a generous rage
for public justice and a democratic sympathy with
the poor. His service to mankind was this, that in
the hour of universal repression and discourage-
ment, he made all England and all Europe hear the
I20 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
note of everlasting defiance. He was called Satanic :
there have been moments in history when the quali-
ties of Milton's Satan are needed to save mankind.
" Yet, Freedom ! yet thy banner, torn, but flying,
Streams like the thunderstorm against the wind."
He spoke, and the oppressor looked pitiable, and
the inquisitor stood naked to the scorn of the world ;
the laugh at last was turned against the anti-Jacobin.
The government no more dared silence him than
the Russian government dared silence Tolstoi. His
previous literary fame, his personal prestige, the very
force of the offending satires made it impossible to
institute proceedings against the Dedication of Don
Juan, or the Vision of Judgment. But although the
first crash of Byron's thunder could scarcely have
been louder or more electric, the destructive bolts
might have been more wisely aimed. He might then
have exerted a more lasting influence upon England,
where even liberals soon said that the " thunder's
roll " had " taught them little." ^ And though abroad
the Byronic cult has had length of days that are not
yet at an end, it might well have been the religion
of a purer humanity. Mr. Brandes sees this, but he
will not call attention to the spots on his sun.
I have already indicated, in describing the claim
^ I am not raising the question whether Matthew Arnold is to be
counted as a "liberal" or not. It is characteristic of him that he has
packed into two sonneis, " To a Republican P^iend, 1848," the higher
faith of Liberalism and the higher wisdom of Conservatism in lines so
admirable that every good citizen ought to know them by heart.
POETRY AND REBELLION ill
set up by the reactionaries to be considered as the
high priests of virtue, how the atmosphere of the
time provoked Byron to confound the hearth with
the altar and the throne. The temptation no doubt
was strong, but he could have resisted it if there
had not been a weak place in his own armour.
His cynical view of private morals, so different from
the generosity of his political passions, was connected
with his old-fashioned and essentially aristocratic
ideas of women. This deficiency in his equipment
as a rebel has escaped Mr. Brandes' attention. Byron
was not revolutionary enough : his ideas of male
supremacy were those of the ancien regime. He
understood the rights of man, but he seems never
to have heard of the rights of woman. Yet the
idea had already been set afloat among our English
radicals, though only in the crudest form. Shorn
of its coarseness and hardness, Mary WoUstonecraft's
Rights of Women was in her day a great advance in
social thought. It is a vulgar error to suppose that
the book contains a single word against marriage ;
but it claims education for women, on the ground
that the relation of the sexes must be essentially in-
tellectual and moral, not sensual and trivial. All
such ideas were to the creator of Juan and Haidee
no less ridiculous than to Lord Eldon or George III.
"You must have observed," says Byron, "that I
give my heroines extreme refinement, joined to great
simplicity and want of education " : this cheap
122 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
surrender to the "manly" ideal of "the fair sex"
largely accounts for the popularity of his works
with the vulgar and the conventional. The moment
he touched on women Byron was the dandy and
grand seigneur. He thus writes (November 8,
1819) of the Countess Guiccioli : " As neither her
birth, nor her rank, nor connections of birth or
marriage are inferior to my own, I am in honour
bound to support her through." What revolutionary
sentiments! What justice and equality is here
implied to the Guiccioli's humbler sisters ! The
truth is that the deliverer of Greece had not " doubled
Cape Turk." Mr. Brandes might have pointed out
this fact in one of his seven chapters on Byron, with-
out sinning against the rigidity of his own liberalism.
Again, Mr. Brandes treats the Byronic philosophy
of life with the same respect with which he treats
the Byronic politics. This seems a mistake. So,
too, some of the pages devoted to the content of
Byron's nature poetry, might have been better spent
on Wordsworth's. Is Manfred really "matchless as
an Alpine landscape " ? (p. 302). It has some
formidable rivals 1 The true poetry of nature and
of the then newly discovered Alps, may rather be
sought in Coleridge's Hymn to Mont Blanc; in Shelley's
Prometheus (Act II. sc. 3), and above all in the
Sixth Book of the Prelude, with all the absurd, pleasing,
trivial realism of the walking tour, lighted by oc-
casional gleams of solemn grandeur wherein the
POETRY AND REBELLION 123
mountains are revealed as the symbol of something
too great for our comprehension.
Mr. Brandes in no way under-estimates the value
of the content of Shelley's poetry. He says, speaking
of the birth at Field Place in August 1792, that his
"life was to be of greater and more enduring signi-
ficance in the emancipation of the human mind than
all that happened in France" even in that great
month. Here, surely, he is more in the right than
Matthew Arnold, Because Shelley does not, like
Byron, deal with politics and daily life, he is not
therefore " ineffectual." It is through his poetry that
we occasionally get glimpses into that other sphere
of passions not of this earth.
"Nor seeks nor finds he mortal blisses,
But feeds on the aerial kisses
Of shapes that haunt thought's wildernesses."
It is, indeed, true that whenever Shelley tried to
apply the standards of his world to the hard facts
of ours, he made himself, at best, ridiculous. As
an influence on politics in his own day, he was
nothing. His cry after " something afar from the
sphere of our sorrow," died away like faint music
over the heads of the men whom Byron summoned
to the barricades,
" Ad arma, cessantes ad arma
Concitet, imperiumque frangat."
But now that Metternich and Castlereagh are no
124 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
more, and Garibaldi's statue is safe on the Janiciilum,
and the ages still go by bringing to Western Europe
subtler oppressions and larger liberties ; now that
we must apply our minds to " Riddles of death
Thebes never knew"; now it is that we find best
of all in Shelley's poetry the atmosphere which can
truly be called Freedom, the zeal for the unfettered
pursuit of truth and of justice and of beauty ; in
each fresh generation, youth will for ever be
setting out on some new voyage for which the last
chorus in Hellas is the sailors' chant of departure.
This idea Mr. Brandes has well expressed as
follows : —
" When Shelley sings to liberty, we feel that this
" liberty is not a thing which we can grasp with our
"hands, or confer as a gift in a constitution, or
"inscribe among the articles of a state church," or,
one might surely add, on the programme of a revolu-
tionary club ! " It is the eternal cry of the human
" spirit, its never-ending requirement of itself ; it is
"the spark of heavenly fire which Prometheus placed
" in the human heart when he formed it, and which
" it has been the work of the greatest among men to
"fan into the flame that is the source of all light, and
'all warmth in those who feel that life would be
"dark as the grave and cold as stone without it."
But liberty, even Shelley's liberty, is not an end
but a means. This brings us at last to issue with
the central idea of Mr. Brandes' book. Liberty,
POETRY AND REBELLION 125
indeed, is the indispensable condition of any noble
function of the soul — a condition so seldom realised,
to be won in the first instance only by such deter-
mined and painful warfare, and retained only by
so constant a watch upon our conduct and its
motives, that it is no wonder if those few who know
the value and the rarity of freedom, sometimes make
the error of supposing it to be the end of life. Yet
it is not the end but the means. The mischief is
that the majority of men, who do not regard it as
an end, greatly under-estimate its importance as a
means, or think that they have got it when they
are only following some conventional standard.
And as with life, so with poetry, which is the
essence of life. The condition of poetry is freedom,
but the content of poetry is joy, sorrow, beauty, love,
man's awe at the strength and his hope in the
beneficence of those unknown powers upon whose
lap all living things are cradled. Poetry must speak
not merely or even chiefiy, as Mr. Brandes seems
to think, of liberty, but of all that the human spirit
desires and fears. It is because Shelley has created
his goddess Liberty in the image of all these things,
that she has some reality as an object for our
devotion ; there is little to distinguish his liberty from
those spiritual and material forces of nature to which
he appeals in the Ode to the West Wind. And all the
great passions of the heart and of the intellect find
expression in Wordsworth, Coleridge, Shelley, and
126 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
Keats. Mr. Brandes comprehends all these passions,
but his heart is stirred most deeply by the note
of rebellion. Hence, after doing full justice to
Coleridge, Scott, Keats and Shelley, he dwells longer
and more lovingly on Byron. " In the First Canto
"of Childe Harold^' he says, "we already find the love
" of freedom exalted as the one force capable of emanci-
"pating from the despair with which the universal
"misery (the Weltschmerz, as the Germans call it)
"has overwhelmed the soul " (p. 296). The prescrip-
tion is too limited to cope with a disease so general.
It is only for particular individuals in special epochs
of history that the love of liberty by itself alone can
be enough to ennoble life. Byron in the age of
Metternich was perhaps a case in point, but Byron
was neither an ordinary person, nor ordinarily situ-
ated,— nor altogether satisfactory. And, after all,
the reason why it was good to overthrow Metternich
was that we might advance freely to the positive
values of life which Byron so often afifected to
deny.
Liberty, then, is not the last, but the first, word in
human affairs. Its spirit must envelope and preserve
the poet, lest he suffer decay, like Wordsworth and
Tennyson growing thistle-headed in old age. But
his eye must be fixed on things of more positive
value. In an age of tyranny and hypocrisy such as
I have described, this atmosphere of liberty had
perforce to materialise into rebellion, as in Coleridge
POETRY AND REBELLION 127
and Wordsworth in their youth, and in Shelley and
Byron. Keats, indeed, with that wonderful artist's
sanity of his, remained an onlooker with strong
liberal sympathies, rather than an active rebel. He
never belonged to a " Pantisocratic " society. And it
was easy for Browning and Meredith to find "liberty"
enough in this attitude, in an age of comparative
freedom. But by whatever means, whether by
rebellion or otherwise, each kept the windows of his
mind clear, the chief value of their work (except only
in Byron's case) lay not in the wars they waged, but
in the things for which alone it is worth while to
wage war.
Blessed be the Quantock Hills, blazing with bell-
heather above Somerset's green lanes, and sea, and
blessed among English summers be that of 1797 !
For there and then did Coleridge and Wordsworth,
no less creative than young Buonaparte in the Italian
fields, plan out the downfall of Pope and of the ancien
regime in letters. If the spy whom Pitt sent to
watch them had fathomed their real design and its
ultimate effect on the established order of things
literary and spiritual, what a report the honest fellow
might have sent his master ! Perhaps in the style
of Carlyle's Cagliostro s Prophecy : — " Ha ! What see
I ? All the Alexandrines in creation are burnt
up ! . . ."
And yet it was not by rebellion but by creation
that Wordsworth and Coleridge triumphed. How
128 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
many times have young men, seemingly as clever
and foolish as those two, hopefully sworn to
" Run amuck
With this old wodd for want of strife
Sound asleep."
And how often has the poor sequel been
" No work done, but great works undone."
But those two actually performed all that they
promised to each other upon the Quantock heaths.
And the marvellous Coleridge did the greater part
of his share in the revolution that very winter before
they parted ! For there and then he wrote The
Ancient Mariner and the first part of Christabel. He
wrote them to illustrate his new theory of poetry ;
how it should thrill men with tales of antique glamour.
If more of us could just sit down and " illustrate "
our new theories of literature as happily as Samuel
Taylor on that occasion, what a world it would be !
Wordsworth, on the other hand, proposed as the
proper substitute for Pope something very different
from a revival of mediaeval supernaturalism. He
aspired to give us the inner life of man in contempla-
tion of nature. His mountain ash took a few months
longer to grow to perfection than Coleridge's magic
gourd. In the Quantocks the principal products
of his Muse, according to his own account of it in
the Prelude, were Peter Bell and The Thorn. There
are fine passages in both poems, but both failed
POETRY AND REBELLION 129
to show their author's full strength — not merely or
even chiefly because they contained lines immortally
absurd, like
and
" The Ass turned round his head, and grinned.
Appalling process ! "
" I've measured it from side to side :
'Tis three feet long, and two feet wide,"
— but for the larger reason that both poems contain
too much of incident, glamour and violence, which
assort ill with the true genius of Wordsworth. The
fact was that, although he was writing to illustrate
a principle opposed to Coleridge's theory, he was
nevertheless for the moment too much under his
friend's influence. But in those same months on
the Quantocks he also wrote minor poems entirely
in his own best manner : — " I heard a thousand
blended notes " ; " It is the first mild day of March " ;
the last two lines of Simon Lee; and "Up ! up! my
Friend, and quit your books." And he had scarcely
left the Quantocks and Coleridge in the summer of
1798, before he wrote the first of his masterpieces,
Tintern Abbey. In the next half-dozen years followed
nearly all his greatest work replete with " vital feelings
of delight." He had in that short while done more
for the happiness and perfection of mankind than
all the Pantisocratic Societies that ever talked. His
poems dwell in us, while the Ancient Mariner, a greater
miracle of art perhaps, is a tale told us by a strange
I30 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
man from a far country. Mediaeval magic is outside
our daily experience, a recreation, not a sustenance ;
but Wordsworth's poems are the inner life we live
if we are wise : —
" Under such banners militant, the soul
Seeks for no trophies, struggles for no spoils
That may attest her prowess, blest in thoughts
That are their own perfection and reward,
Strong in herself and in beatitude
That hides her, like the mighty flood of Nile
Poured from his fount of Abyssinian clouds
To fertilise the whole Egyptian plain."
It is, then, more desirable than Mr. Brandes thinks,
that the Truce of Poetry should be observed, when-
ever the spirit of liberty can honestly exist without
open rebellion. The best poetry should be the
common ground of all creeds and of all parties.
What a blessing it is that we do not know what
"party" or "Church" or no-Church Shakespeare
" belonged to " ; and the innate conservatism of
Paradise Lost so neatly balances Milton's Republi-
canism that he remains a national instead of a party
asset. Poetry unites those whom all other writing
divides. It is a body of scripture, almost a religion,
common to those who, though not of one opinion
in everything, seek some method by which to
approach one another on subjects of deepest feeling
and importance. Liberal spirits and pious souls
would have greater difficulty in understanding each
other, if it were not for Milton, Wordsworth and
POETRY AND REBELLION 131
Shelley, and the emotions to which they give the most
perfect expression. If poetry were at all widely
understood and loved, we should find among men
more of those several qualities to engender which
is the true function of religion and of free thought,
of conservative and liberal movements.
For this reason, and for many others besides,
there is truth in the old saying about the songs
and the laws ; yes, the songs of the people would
indeed be more important than their laws, if only
they learnt the songs and lived by them, as they
learn and observe the laws ! But how little is this
condition fulfilled, even among us English whose
greatest achievement among so many great achieve-
ments is the body of poetry we have produced. Of
how much real account is this heritage of ours in
the spiritual life even of our educated class ? What
percentage of persons in any section of the com-
munity has read Wordsworth's Resolution and Inde-
pendence twice through for love of it ?
There is also another and potentially a vaster
sphere of influence for our poets, in America, where
for thousands of years to come, innumerable millions
will be brought up to speak our common tongue.
Let us hope that at least some thousands of them
in every generation may be endowed with the
qualities of mind and spirit necessary to make
Shakespeare and Milton, Wordsworth and Keats
more to them than names of people whose houses
132 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
are to be visited on tour. May these poets exert
over us and our remote descendants the same
enormous and enduring influence that Virgil and
Dante exerted over old Europe. Otherwise, whatever
successes may attend on Democracy or on Empire,
the Anglo-Saxon race will have failed in its chief
mission of spreading in widest commonalty the
highest pleasures which the human spirit can enjoy.
JOHN WOOLMAN, THE QUAKER
There are three religious autobiographies that I
think of together — the Confessions of St. Augustine
and of Rousseau and the Journal of John Woolman,
the Quaker. Each of these men had soul-life
abundantly, and the power of recording his experi-
ences in that kind ; and each gave the impulse to
a great current in the world's affairs — the Mediaeval
Church, the French Revolution, and the Anti-Slavery
Movement. But Woolman is to me the most at-
tractive, and I am proud to think that it was he
who was the Anglo-Saxon — the " woolman " of old
English trader stock.
There is an element of self in the finest ecstasies
of St. Augustine, the spiritual parent of Johamies
Agricola in Meditation as depicted by Robert Brown-
ing, and of all that hard soul-saving clan. He begins
religion at the opposite end from Francis of Assisi,
and they never meet. The African Saint started
Western Europe on the downward course of religious
persecution proper. Before him there had, indeed,
been persecution of religions for racial or political
reasons, but St. Augustine was perhaps the chief of
those who supplied the religious motive for religious
133
134 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
persecution, and turned God Himself into Moloch,
a feat which no one but a really " good " man could
have performed. Thenceforth, until the age of the
much abused Whigs and sceptics, all the best people
in the world were engaged in torturing each other
and making earth into hell. It was through St.
Augustine rather than through Constantine that the
Church drank poison. The torch was handed down
from him through St. Dominic and St. Ignatius till
it scorched the hand of St, John of Geneva by the
pyre of Servetus. They were all, at least after their
conversions, unusually " good " men, but not good
all through like John Woolman.
Rousseau, at any rate, was not "good." We all
ought to read his Confessions, but I fear the reason
why many of us perform this duty is not always
the highest. For this great spiritual reformer owns
up to common weaknesses indulged to degrees that
rise to an epic height. The story of the piece of
ribbon thrills us with a moment's illusion that we
are morally superior to the man who started the
"religious reaction" and the love of mountains, as
well as the French Revolution. And then he fulfilled
the social contract by leaving his babies at the door
of the foundling hospital. The imaginary story of
the youth and manhood of one of those unfathered
children of genius, say during the French Revolution,
would be a fine theme for an historical fictionist of
imagination and humour : Stevenson, for instance,
JOHN WOOLMAN, THE QUAKER 135
would have loved to show by what strange routes
through the Quartier Latin or elsewhere that deserted
brood of the " old Serpent of Eternity " found their
way to the Morgue — or perhaps to a bourgeois' easy-
chair. O " Savoyard Vicar," first lover of the moun-
tains, brother of the poor, shaker down of empires,
how from such weakness as yours was born such
strength ? No wonder he puzzles his biographers,
of whom himself was the first. No one can under-
stand the people who do not understand themselves.
Rousseau, having puzzled himself, inevitably puzzled
Lord Morley, who had caught hold of simple Voltaire
and packed him neatly into one small volume (with
Frederic thrown in to keep him company), while the
insoluble problem of Rousseau trails on through two
volumes — the more interesting but the less " final "
of the twin biographies. Carlyle, though he posed
Rousseau for " Hero as man of letters " did not even
touch the problem. But the uncouth, rebellious child
of nature struck in him sympathetic chords, and
evoked outbursts of grim Carlylean humour, thus : —
" He could be cooped into garrets, laughed at
"as a maniac, left to starve like a wild beast in his
"cage; — but he could not be hindered from setting
"the world on fire. His semi-delirious speculations
"on the miseries of civilised life, and suchlike, helped
" well to produce a whole delirium in France generally.
"True, you may well ask, — what could the world, the
"governors of the world, do with such a man ? Diffi-
136 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
"cult to say what the governors of the world could
"do with him ! What he could do with them is un-
" happily clear enough, — guillotine a great many of
« them ! "
On another occasion, it is said, at a very English
dinner table, Carlyle was bored by a tribe of
Philistines who were reiterating over their port
our great insular doctrine that " political theories
make no difference to practice." After listening
long in silence he growled out, "There was once
"a man called Rousseau. He printed a book of
"political theories, and the nobles of that land
"laughed. But the next edition was bound in their
"skins." And so with a big Scottish peasant's
chuckle, he fell silent again amid the apologetic
coughs of the discomposed dinner-party.
John Woolman was a contero.porary of Voltaire
and Rousseau though he scarcely knew it. And the
spirit of that age, "dreaming on things to come,"
spoke a new word through him also, bidding men
prepare the ground for what we may call the Anglo-
Saxon Revolution, the abolition of negro slavery.
Woolman's Journal tells how this humblest and
quietest of men used to travel round on foot, year
after year, among those old-fashioned American
Quakers, stirring their honest but sleepy consciences
on this new point of his touching " the holding their
fellow men as property." A Quaker Socrates, with
JOHN WOOLMAN, THE QUAKER 137
his searching, simple questions, he surpassed his
Athenian prototype in love and patience and argu-
mentative fairness, as much as he fell below him in
intellect. And when the Friends found that they
could not answer John's questions, instead of poison-
ing him or locking him up as an anarchist, they let
their slaves go free ! Truly, a most surprising out-
come for the colloquy of wealthy and settled men with
a humble and solitary pedestrian ! Incredible as it
may seem, they asked no one for " Compensation " !
But then the Quakers always were an odd people.
Woolman's religious experience, from first to last
concerned his love and duty toward his fellow
creatures, and not the selfish salvation of his own
soul. His conversion, we may say, dated from the
following incident in his childhood : —
" On going to a neighbour's house, I saw on the
"way a robin sitting on her nest, and as I came near
" she went off ; but having young ones, she flew about
"and with many cries expressed her concern for
" them. I stood and threw stones at her, and one
" striking her she fell down dead. At first I was
" pleased with the exploit, but after a few minutes
" was seized with horror, at having, in a sportive way,
"killed an innocent creature while she was careful
" for her young. I beheld her lying dead, and thought
" those young ones, for which she was so careful,
'' must now perish for want of their dam to nourish
" them. After some painful considerations on the
138 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
"subject, I climbed up the tree, took all the young
"birds and killed them, supposing that better than
" to leave them to pine away and die miserably. In
"this case I believed that Scripture proverb was ful-
" filled, The tender mercies of the wicked are cruel. I
" then went on my errand, and for some hours could
"think of little else but the cruelties I had committed,
"and was much troubled. Thus He whose tender
" mercies are over all His works hath placed a principle
"in the human mind, which incites to exercise good-
" ness towards every living creature."
He was so filled with the spirit of love that he
became, as it were, unconscious of danger and suffer-
ing when he was about the work dictated by this
impelling force.
"Twelfth of sixth month," 1763, in time of war
with the Red Indians, " being the first of the week
" and a rainy day, we continued in our tent, and I was
" led to think on the nature of the exercise which hath
"attended me. Love was the first motion, and thence
" a concern arose to spend some time with the Indians,
"that I might feel and understand their fife and the
" spirit they live in, if haply I might receive some in-
" struction from them, or they might be in any degree
" helped forward by my following the leadings of truth
" among them ; and as it pleased the Lord to make
"way for my going at a time when the troubles of
"war were increasing, and when by reason of much
"wet weather travelling was more difficult than usual
JOHN WOOLMAN, THE QUAKER 139
" at that season, I looked upon it as a more favourable
"opportunity to season my mind, and to bring me
" into a nearer sympathy with them." And so he went
among the Indians to exchange with them what we
should now call " varieties of religious experience,"
at a time when one section of them had proclaimed
"war with the English," and were actually bringuig
back English scalps.
His objections to luxury, which he carried to the
greatest lengths in his own case, were based not
on any ascetic feeling, but on the belief that luxury
among the well-to-do was a cause of their rapacity and
therefore of their oppression of the poor. " Expensive
"living," he writes, "hath called for a large supply,
"and in answering this call the faces of the poor
" have been ground away and made thin through
" hard dealing." He was himself a man of but slender
means, yet on this ground he denied himself things
which he regarded as luxuries, and others would call
common comforts. Humanity he thought of as a
whole, not as a collection of individuals each busy
saving his own soul or amassing his own fortune.
The rich, he held, were responsible for the miseries
of the poor, and the " good " for the sins of the
reprobate. " The law of Christ," he said, " consisted
"in tenderness towards our fellow-creatures, and a
"concern so to walk that our conduct may not be the
" means of strengthening them in error."
If the world could take John Woolman for an
HO CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
example in religion and politics instead of St. Augustine
and Rousseau, we should be doing better than we
are in the solution of the problems of our own day.
Our modern conscience-prickers often are either too
"clever" or too violent. What they have said in
one play or novel, they must contradict in the next
for fear of appearing simple. Or if they are frankly
simple, they will set fire to your house to make you
listen to their argument. " Get the writings of John
Woolman by heart," said Charles Lamb — sound advice
not only for lovers of good books but for would-be
reformers.
They say John Brown in the ghost went marching
along in front of the Northern armies. Then I guess
John Woolman was bringing up the ambulance behind.
He may have lent a spiritual hand to Walt Whitman
in the flesh, bandaging up those poor fellows. As
to John Brown, to use a Balkan expression, he was
a comitadji "undaunted, true and brave." He could
knock up families at night and lead out the fathers and
husbands to instant execution, or be hung himself,
with an equal sense of duty done, all in the name of
the Lord, who he reckoned was antagonistic to negro
slavery. And then came the war, those slaughterings
by scores of thousands of the finest youthful manhood
in the world, the grinding up of the seed-corn of
Anglo-Saxon America, from which racially she can
never wholly recover. And all because the majority
of slave-owners, not being Quakers, had refused to
JOHN WOOLMAN, THE QUAKER 141
listen to John Woolman. Close your ears to John
Woolman one century, and you will get John Brown
the next, with Grant to follow.
The slave-owners in the British Empire were not
Quakers, but fortunately for us they were a feeble
folk, few enough to be bought out quietly. One of
England's characteristic inventions is Revolution by
purchase. It saves much trouble, but it is a luxury
that only rich societies can afford. It was lucky for
England that George III did not keep the Southern
colonies when he lost us New England. It very
nearly happened so, and if it had, then would Old
England have been wedded to slavery. As it is she
became John Woolman's best pupil.
The Anti-Slavery movement was quite as important
as the French Revolution. For if the " industrial
revolution " had been fully developed, all the world
over, while men still thought it right to treat black
men as machines, the exploitation of the tropics
by the modern Company promoter on " Congo "
lines would have become the rule instead of the
exception. Central America, Africa, perhaps India
and ultimately China, would be one hell, and Europe
would be corrupted as surely as old Rome when
she used the conquered world as a stud-farm to
breed slaves for her latifundia. The Anti-Slavery
movement came in the nick of time, just before
machinery could universalise the slave system.
Slavery on the scale of our modern industries, bind-
142 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
ing all the continents together in one wicked system
of exploitation, would have been too big an " interest "
for reformers to tackle. Even as it was, America was
very nearly strangled by " cotton " in the Southern
States, a more evil and a far more formidable thing
than the old eighteenth-century domestic slavery in
the same region. But Wilberforce had by that time set
the main current of the world's opinion the other way.
So it was too late. But even now Congo and Putu-
mayo and the Portuguese Colonies remind us how
narrow was the world's escape and how incomplete
is the victory. We still need men like Mr. Morel and
Sir Roger Casement to cut the bandages from our
eyes, or we stand blindfold holding the clothes to the
never-ending wickedness of Mammon. How then
would it have gone with the world if that poor Quaker
clerk had kept to himself those first queer questionings
of his about " holding fellow-men as property " ?
Woolman was not a bigwig in his own day, and he
will never be a bigwig in history. But if there be a
" perfect witness of all-judging Jove," he may expect
his meed of much fame in heaven. And if there be
no such witness, we need not concern ourselves. He
was not working for " fame " either here or there.
POOR MUGGLETON AND THE CLASSICS
Poor Muggleton was a failure at the classics. With-
out the help of Mr. Bohn's translations he never could
read Greek or any but the simplest Latin, though he
had studied little else save those two languages during
eight years at school ; so he had to be rescued
ignominiously by some new-fangled tripos at Cam-
bridge. Hence he writes with the proverbial bitter-
ness of the incompetent, on a subject of which he
really knows nothing. Only to-day I received from
him the following precious lucubration about our
methods of classical teaching, written in complete
ignorance of the reforms that have taken place in
it since he was a boy : —
" Greek tragedy, unlike Homer and Aristophanes, is
the hardest thing in the world of letters to be ap-
preciated by an Englishman with Shakespeare in his
blood. The plays require a Verrall to turn them inside
out and a Gilbert Murray to translate them into Swin-
burnian, before I can see something they might have
meant, — and didn't according to some critics ! And
these masterpieces, requiring the finest subtlety of
literary feeling and scholarship in the reader, are
selected for the perusal of boys who have not
144 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
yet mastered Greek grammar and are ignorant of
the real values even of English literature. I was
actually turned on to read Hecuba when I was ten !
What was Hecuba to me or I to Hecuba ? I remember
feeling vaguely depressed by a mental picture of the
poor old lady sitting in the dust at a tent door, but I
was not purified by fear and pity. I thought it all
strangely dull, whereas Homer and Aristophanes I
always understood and felt, even when I had to look
out every second word. I daresay the age for begin-
ning Greek tragedy has since been raised to eleven,
or even twelve ! Who knows ? For Reform is afoot
in the scholastic world nowadays.
" I am sometimes told that Greek tragedy has to be
put thus early into boys' hands, in order to provide
examples of the Iambic verse which they are shortly
afterwards required to compose. But why are they
asked to compose poetry in a language they have
not yet mastered ? In the case of any modern
language, no schoolmaster would dream of adopt-
ing a method so absurd. I only wish I had been
taught to read Greek fluently, instead of being com-
pelled to translate English into Greek verse. That
process was, with my schoolfellows and me, a very
remarkable kind of literary occupation. We first
looked out all the English words in a dictionary and
wrote down the Greek equivalents in their English
order ; and then we tried to transpose the words thus
collected into an order consonant with the rules of
MUGGLETON AND THE CLASSICS 145
Iambic metre, which were to us purely arbitrary and
meaningless. It was neither more nor less educative
than putting together the pieces of a Chinese puzzle.
I have certainly been helped in my understanding
of the construction of sentences and the subtlety of
language by a rigid course of Latin Prose composi-
tion ; but Greek composition was quite beyond me,
and I believe that only the best scholars have time
to learn both properly.
"The fact is," continues Muggleton — [Whenever
a man writes "the fact is," or "doubtless," he is
always going to rush into the realms of purest fancy
or conjecture, as Muggleton now] — " The fact is that
the scheme of education now made to serve for the
average English upper class boy was devised in its
main outlines in the time of Erasmus, in the glorious
days when Learning like a stranger came from far and
lodged in Queen's College, Cambridge. The scheme
was then devised, not for many stupid boys, but for
a few clever boys ; not to prepare them for business,
government or general culture, but to enable them to
edit ' brown Greek manuscripts,' to * give us the
doctrine of the enclitic De,' and rout the Scotists.
Almost the sole duty of the learned at that moment
in the world's affairs, was to master Greek and Latin
grammar and edit Greek and Latin texts. And into
this ancient mould, contrived for a special purpose long
ago fulfilled and done with, the mind of the average
little Englishman is still in great measure forced. The
146 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
thing was already an anachronism and a scandal as
long ago as the reign of Charles II, when Eachard, in
his famous Contempt of the Clergy, pronounced in quite
the modern spirit against the methods of classical
education common to his day and our own.
" I cannot join in the wish often expressed that a
classical education may be preserved for the ordinary
boy, because he has never had one yet. But I hope
he may get one soon. Hitherto he has always been
sacrificed to the real or supposed needs of a scholarly
minority. The present system is skilfully contrived
to enable a boy of average talents to spend eight
years almost exclusively at Latin and Greek, and
leave off unable to read at sight either of those
languages, save the very simplest Latin."
Poor old Muggleton ! This is one of the subjects
on which he is like a bear with a sore head — and an
uncommonly thick one at that ! Yet his bitterness
against classical education is not extended to the
classics. Hellas herself, the mistress whom he has
wooed in vain, he follows with the " old-dog " faith-
fulness of the rejected lover in comedy. As one who
has ceased to hope but not to sigh, finds it his chief
bliss to watch the lady drive past in the Park, so does
Muggleton still sit down to his Homer, — Greek and
English, — opening it ever with a secret thrill of
reverence. He is often found sitting in front of the
Elgin Marbles. And he loves to listen to tales of the
MUGGLETON AND THE CLASSICS 147
spades of Crete. He would never go to Athens in
company, or at a season when others were there.
But last summer he cunningly designed and executed
a feint of visiting the Balkans, ostensibly to see how
the Christians in those parts loved one another, but
really to emerge thence at Salonika and make a bolt
for Athens in the hot season, when no one else would
be on the Acropolis ! All seems to have gone well,
for I received the following from him, written at
Salonika : —
"No, I don't care whether the Bulgarian troops
round the corner have their throats cut, or cut the
throats of the Greeks, though clearly one or the other
will happen before the month is out. I am sitting on
the balcony, looking over the busy little modern port
at a better world and a greater epoch in Levantine
history, looking at Olympus across the shining waters
of the Aegean, across the bay where Xerxes' fleet rode
at anchor when it had come through the canal of
Athos ; I am on the spot — it may be — where he sat
to review it. His army must have been camped in
the great plain behind, across which our slow train
dragged us yesterday from Monastir. It was as he ap-
proached Therma ( = Salonika) that the lions attacked
his camels. And then, says Herodotus, Xerxes seeing
from The^nna the mountains of Thessalj, 0/ywpus —
Well, there across the bay is Olympus, seen from
Therma still, though no longer by Xerxes, crowned
with snow in June, girdled with rocks, cleft with
148 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
gullies and wrapped round its base with white
morning clouds, which leave it above, alone in aether,
in a world far from ours. So it stood for aeons before
the first fair-haired Achaean warriors came across
the plain from the north, seeking sunnier lands by
this gay blue sea. So it stood when they looked at it
and wondered what lands lay beyond, hidden by it,
and went south to see, and stayed, for the lands were
good and they and their children might dwell there.
So it stood, when Xerxes looked at it from here, and
his courtiers, it may be, told him that the Hellenes
deemed that their gods dwelt on the summit. By the
issue of that happier Turkish war of old, when first
'the barbarian' came, it was decided whether that
mountain should be as other mountains which have
been clothed with legends by the valley-dwellers and
seafarers at their base, — legends that rested on them
awhile and melted off like the summer snow and were
forgotten ; or whether after some 2500 years the bare
sight of that mountain and the knowledge of its name
should be to a traveller from an island beyond the
limits of the world the one sight that he could not
endure to see without tears, though he had passed
through lands just liberated and villages desolated by
war, — because no place on earth could win of him
such reverence, were it not that there is a city beyond
that mountain."
From a subsequent letter I gather that the city
referred to is Athens. Muggleton was not seasick on
MUGGLETON AND THE CLASSICS 149
the voyage from Salonika to Chalcis, so he was able
to imagine himself on board an Athenian trireme at
Artemisium, beating up and down the straits of
Euboea in alternate fits of pluck and panic during
Thermopylae week. Luckily it was midnight when he
went by Thermopylae, so he missed the disillusion-
ment of seeing the famous pass now broadened by
the retirement of the sea. He saw it all, vaguely, by
a Byronic moon, weaving " her bright chain o'er the
deep," and could imagine that the lights at the foot
of the mountains were the torches of the barbarians
preparing to attack Leonidas at dawn.
So next week I got this letter from Muggleton,
dated 7 A.M., from " the roof of the Parthenon."
" You are still in bed. I am on the high top gallant
of the world. The Acropolis opens at dawn and I
have had an hour here alone ! There was one guardian
on the scene, with whom I made friends over a little
wild bird he had caught and was nursing. He let
me into the staircase that leads onto the roof of the
Parthenon and locked me in. I say 'roof,' though
roof there is none, but I am sitting on the top of the
unroofed marble walls. A few inches under my left
foot is the riders' frieze, — for Elgin left the west side
of it. I crossed onto the top of the outer or pedi-
ment wall and thence looked back and saw the frieze
at close quarters, hailing the youth in the felt hat
whom I have long loved in casts and photographs.
There he still rides, as Phidias taught him, with head
150 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
half bent ; only the back rim of his hat is broken off
into mere outline by Time. Then I crossed by a
breach in the marble cliffs onto the pediment — the
ledge where the Elgin Marbles used to sit — and made
m.y way along it, like a mortal on Olympus while the
Gods are away. At the other end of the pediment
are the two remaining statues, male and female, in an
awful and religious solitude. There these two now sit
alone, ' strength and beauty met together,' looking
over Aegina and Salamis, and waiting for the end of
the world. Now I have stood beside them ; I have
made my pilgrimage and touched the gods of my
idolatry.
"No description can give you Athens. If you feel
that these were the greatest people in the world, who
invented freedom, art, literature and thought, and if, so
feeling, you stand on the Acropolis and see all the
undoubted places in which they did it, with the old
school-familiar names upon them — Pnyx, Parthenon,
Dionysus' Theatre, Salamis Bay — all blent together in
a harmony of reds and greys, yellows and olive-greens,
with purple hills beyond to crown Cephisus' vale as
yesterday at sunset, — why then not Rome has any-
thing like it to show the heart.
"A stone's-throw from the Parthenon stands the
Erechtheum, loveliest of buildings in the Ionic style
as the Parthenon is the grandest in the Doric. Fifty
years only parts them, the second great fifty years of
Athenian history, yet the change from one perfect form
MUGGLETON AND THE CLASSICS 151
of architecture and ornament to another was made as
easily as when a sleeper turns on his side.
" The modern town has kindly built itself far away
not merely from the summit of the Acropolis but
from the site of the greatest places below. There, for
instance, is the Areopagus, a kopje or limestone outcrops
as naked and as primeval to-day as it was when Orestes
and other less mythical personages were tried there.
The cave underneath was where the Furies lived.
The modern town, where it is permitted to appear, is
most inoffensive and does duty in the spectacle for
the old one, its tiles forming part of the colour
scheme in the view from up here. Nothing in the
landscape distracts the eye in its leap from the
Acropolis to the hills and islands on the horizon, —
corresponding to Alban and Sabine hills in the Jani-
culan view. Aegina, in the middle distance, is really
as far away from here as Dover from Calais, but in this
clear atmosphere the distance only begins with Argolis
beyond.
" It is half-past eight, and already as I sit up here
the sun is reverberating off Pericles' huge marble
blocks. The birds are going in and out of the holes
in the smooth, white walls. Not that the walls are
ruinous, for what is left of the Parthenon is most
beautifully cared for and repaired. New marble
blocks, carefully dated i8y2y igo2, iQii, as the case
may be, are put in where required to hold it together.
" What irony that this, the central hall of the civi-
152 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
lised world, should have stood complete during the
1200 years when mankind was too barbarous to care
about it, and was blown up by Christians and Moslems
between them in 1678, just before the West returned
to worship it. Think of those thousand years, when
the sun rose and set every day on the Parthenon
standing in perfect beauty, uncared for by the savage
tribes of men. Even the ruins are worth to us any
othtr ten buildings. For here the plant ' man ' first
shot up aloft into aether. From primal brushwood
suddenly he grew up straight into an oak of which the
head touched heaven ; and in the branches such
birds sang and such fruits hung as never since are
seen or heard. Since then we have all been smaller
offshoots of that tree, save when the brushwood
reconquers territory, as it often does and has most
sadly here, with its squat Turkish fungus, followed
by the merry little scrub-oak Greek of to-day, to
whom I wish all good things. But here, where for
once the holy spirit of man "
Here Muggleton grows speculative, and I return
his letter to my pocket.
THE MIDDLE MARCHES
" On Keilder-side the wind blaws wide ;
There sounds nae hunting-horn
That rings sae sweet as the winds that beat
Round banks where Tyne is born.
The Wansbeck sings with all her springs,
The bents and braes give ear ;
But the wood that rings wi' the sang she sings
I may not see nor hear ;
For far and far thae blithe burns are,
And strange is a'thing near."
Swinburne, A Jacobite^ s Exile.
The glories of cloudland, the white mountains with
their billowy clefts, lie along the horizon, rather
than in the dome of the sky. They are frescoes
on the walls, rather than on the ceihng, of heaven.
Sunrise and sunset often paint upon them their
pictures of an hour, unseen by us, behind some
neighbouring grove or hill. Still more often do
Alpine or Cumbrian mountains, from their very
height and the nearness of one giant to another,
hide the wealth of heaven from the climber on
the hill-side, who has, however, in those lands
his terrestrial compensations. In fen country, the
clouds are seen, but at the price of an earth of flat
disillusionment. In Northumberland alone, both
'53
154 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
heaven and earth are seen ; we walk all day on
long ridges, high enough to give far views of moor
and valley, and the sense of solitude above the world
below, yet so far distant from each other, and of
such equal height, that we can watch the low skirt-
ing clouds as they " post o'er land and ocean without
rest." It is the land of the far horizons, where the
piled or drifted shapes of gathered vapour are for
ever moving along the furthest ridge of hills, like
the procession of long primeval ages that is written
in tribal mounds and Roman camps and Border
towers, on the breast of Northumberland.
The foreground between us and the horizon view
is sometimes heather, alive with the call and flight
of grouse ; more often the " bent," as the ballad
writers called the rough white-grass moor, home of
sparse broods of black game. The silence is only
broken by water's ancient song, as the burn makes
its way down rocky hollows towards the haymakers
at work under the sycamore beside the grey stone
farm below. Up above here, on the moor, the
silent sheep browse all day long, filling the mind
with thoughts of peace and safety ; they seem diligent
to compensate themselves for a thousand years of
raids and interrupted pasture. The farms are so
large, that often, in spite of good shepherding, the
bones of a sheep are found behind some " auld fail
dyke"* — an old-world landmark of this oozy desert.
^ Fail = turf.
THE MIDDLE MARCHES 155
In the great days, the Border poets used to find
skeletons, not of sheep only, thus derelict under the
wasting wind.
" In behint yon auld fail dyke,
I wot their lies a new-slain Knight ;
And naebody kens that he lies there
But his hawk, his hound, and his lady fair.
Mony a one for him makes mane,
But nane sail ken whae he is gane ;
O'er his white banes, when they are bare.
The wind sail blaw for evermair."
Still the west wind blows over Northumberland,
bending seaward each lonely tree. And if it no
longer parches the bones of men, around us and
under our feet in the covering "bent" are strewn
the bones of sheep, and of the lesser victims of the
hovering birds of prey. The ungarnished moorland
tells no flattering tale. For on it we see written the
everlasting alternation of life and death. Peace and
beauty reign, but sternly mindful of the conditions
of their tenure, the eternal law that the generations
must live by devouring each other. So on the moor,
" We wot of life through death.
How each feeds each we spy."
Northumberland throws over us, not a melancholy,
but a meditative spell.
" It gives us homeliness in desert air,
And sovereignty in spaciousness."
156 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
For the distance, the illimitable, is seldom out of
sight. The far ridge, the horizon rich with cloud
shapes, is always there. Like all the greatest things,
like the universe itself, this land does not easily yield
up the truth, whether its secret heart is of joy or
of sorrow. It heightens both, till they are fused, and
the dispute between them loses meaning. The great
silence is too profound to be broken with a question.
The distance is so grand, that we cannot wish it
near. We are satisfied by we know not what.
One of the greatest of these far views, and the
central one of all for the right geographical compre-
hension of Northumbrian history, is to be had from
a ridge two miles south-east of Elsdon, where the
Harwood road from the east reaches the summit,
pauses appropriately under Winter's Gibbet to take
in the western view, and then begins to fall down
rapidly to Elsdon and Redesdale. It is markedly a
water-shed, as will be seen on the map ; for it divides
the sources of Font and Wansbeck that flow directly
eastward to the sea through the pale of civilisation,
from the Rede Water and North Tyne Valleys, that
here turn and sweep southward for a while through
the old lawless borderland, till at last they reach the
South Tyne, and turn to flow down with it to New-
castle and the sea. Behind the traveller, as he comes
up to the Gibbet, lie a few miles of " bent " and
moorland sloping east towards the agricultural wealth
of seaward Northumberland ; before him, to the west,
THE MIDDLE MARCHES
157
158 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
suddenly revealed as he breasts the ridge, is the
Border country — Redesdale coming down out of the
Cheviot hills in a straight line for twenty miles, and
at its head the massive bluff of Carter Fell, under
whose northern edge the great road passes into
Scotland.
Thus the Gibbet seems the flag of war hung out
on the ramparts by civil against savage man.
Yet, in fact, it was only set up in 1791, when
the shepherds of Redesdale and Tynedale were no
longer lawless, but had become honest Presby-
terians, true to the faith of Burns and the Bible.
The corpse of an unheroic tramp named Winter
was hanged here to rot in chains (and finally,
when he fell to pieces, in a sack) — the last case of
this legal barbarity perpetrated in England, they say.
He had done a sordid murder in these parts, which
struck such a horror through the law-abiding North
England of that later day, that the great Here-
fordshire pugilist, Tom Winter, when he arrived at
a national reputation, had to change his ill-omened
name for the world-renowned title of Tom Spring.
The heroic Border thieves of an earlier age swung
for it often at Hexham or "at that weary Carlisle,"
or on the numerous " Gallows Hills " hereabouts ; but
in their time this spot was marked, not as now by
a wooden gibbet, but by a stone cross, of which
the pedestal still lies sunk in the moss hard by.
Sting Cross, as it was called, stood where its grim
THE MIDDLE MARCHES 159
successor stands now, high on the water-shed, far
seen against the sky line, a guide and encouragement
to the traveller seeking his adventurous way westward
on business among the Redesdale thieves, or bound
to pass up their long valley into Scotland. Sting
Cross must have been a landmark well known to
the waggonless armies of the Border, who rode their
thirty miles a day over the moorland. The chivalry
of Scotland must have passed it, on their raids, when
they came over " Ottercap Hills" and " lighted down
at Greenleighton." A rough road now runs by the
Gibbet ; but then only bridle tracks crossed the
water-shed, several probably converging at the Cross,
to fall thence into the marshy bottom of Redesdale.
From the water-shed on which the Gibbet stands,
another and greater water-shed is clearly visible,
twenty miles away at the head of Redesdale. This
is the curving sweep of the Border Ridge dividing
Scotland and England, sweeping down from the
north-east to the south-west corner of Northumberland,
like the curve of England's head. The view from
the Gibbet embraces the north-eastern half of this
arc, from the Great Cheviot Hill itself to Carter
Fell. There stand the finest of the English Cheviots,
ranged round the head-waters of Coquet, Redesdale,
and North Tyne. This country, the Middle Marches
of Border times, once beyond the pale of civilisation,
is now perhaps the safest and most hospitable district
in the whole world, but is still difficult of access,
i6o CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
except to the pedestrian, for it lacks roads and inns.
In old days, there was no road in it along which a
wheeled vehicle could pass over the Border. The
moss-troopers rode up the length of Redesdale by a
track that forded the Rede Water again and again ;
such, till 1777, was the only way into Scotland
through the Middle Marches. Even to-day there
are only two roads, one up the North Tyne by
Deadwater, and one up the Rede under Carter Fell,
ever swarming with tramps and motors. But the
tramp who seeks, not work but pleasure and medita-
tion, penetrates on foot the recesses of these hills
and walks along the sharp Border Ridge south-west-
wards from Great Cheviot, with the Scottish view
of the Eildon Hills and Tweed over his right shoulder,
and Northumbrian moors over his left. When his
high-level walk has led him past the camp where
the Romans shivered Ad fines, and over Carter Fell,
he will reach the summit of Peel Fell, where the
western view opens before him down Liddesdale
to the Solway. In order to avoid leaving the ridge,
and going ten miles down stream in search of the
nearest inn, he will gladly seek lodging at night with
the Cheviot farmers, true descendants of Dandie
Dinmont, hospitable as the Arabs of the desert, —
Scots and Presbyterians for the most part, even on
the English side. These men, assembling from both
sides of the Border, still at the New Year hunt the
fox in the Bezzle and Henhole, two rocky gashes on
THE MIDDLE MARCHES i6i
the round sides of Great Cheviot Hill, in the tradi-
tional manner recorded long ago by Scott in the
XXVth chapter of Guy Mannering. A run on foot
after the fox, among the moss-hags, on the very top
of Great Cheviot itself, on a frosty morning, with
both kingdoms full in view, is no ill way to begin
the year.
Walter Scott, from this encircling Cheviot Ridge,
threw a few lines and phrases at our English streams,
— Coquet and Rede picked crumbs from the table
he spread for Ettrick and Teviot and Yarrow. Also
he gave us Diana Vernon ; her hunt upon the
mountain side was above Biddlestone Hall, where the
spurs of the English Cheviots, green, round, and
steep in that district, overlook the Coquet, as it
breaks from the hills and spreads down over the
plain towards Rothbury.
The English Border was divided for administrative
and military purposes into the East, Middle, and
West Marches. The East Marches contained the
lands between Berwick and the great Cheviot Hill,
that is, the plain where Till flows into Tweed and
Tweed into the sea, the spacious Thermopylae of
the war between the two great kingdoms, studded
with famous castles — Etal, Wark, Norham ; and
famous battlefields — Homildon Hill and Flodden.
This was one of the two royal routes into Scotland.
The East Marches also included a piece of mountain
1 62 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
district, the great Cheviot Hill and its purHeus, known
as the Forest of Cheviot.
The West Marches corresponded in general nature
to the East. The plain of Carlisle was the only other
route, beside the plain of Berwick, by which the royal
armies with trains of waggons could be passed
over the Border ; and there too were famous castles,
like Naworth ; famous battlefields, like Solway Moss.
And the West Marches, like the East, contained a
piece of wild country, the Bewcastle and Gilsland
wastes, less mountainous, but more lawless than the
Cheviot Forest.
The East and the West Marches have much
the same history. From the beginning of the long
wars in the days of Bruce, down to the union of
the Crowns, they were perpetually subject to Scottish
invasion. But the plain by the Northern Ocean,
and the plain by the Solway Firth, was each inhabited
by a well-ordered society, necessarily pre-occupied
with the military aspects of life, but highly organised
by the King's deputies for purposes of internal police
and external warfare. Only the Cheviot Forest in
the East, and Bewcastle Waste in the West March,
shared the geographical and political character of
the notorious Middle Marches.
The Middle Marches included Redesdale, North
Tynedale, and upper Wansbeck and Coquetdale. Two
long Reports of Royal Commissioners, one in 1542
and another in 1550, give a minute and fascinating
THE MIDDLE MARCHES 163
account of the society of these districts towards the
close of the long centuries of Border warfare, early
in the period celebrated by the Lay of the Last
Minstreiy The Commissioners tell the King that,
in the Middle Marches, the enemy whose raids are
most frequent and most formidable, is not the Scots,
but the English robbers of North Tynedale and
Redesdale. The reason is not far to seek. The in-
habitants of these two valleys were cut off from the
rest of the world, as a glance at the map shows, by
the high moorland rampart on which stood Sting
Cross ; they were thus divided from Coquetdale and
Wansbeck, and the plains beyond. They lived
secluded, under the influence of perpetual Border
warfare, from which the rest of Northumberland
was partly sheltered. North Tynedale and Redesdale,
as the Commissioners report, are inhabited by a
population, sparse according to some standards, but
thick out of all proportion to the meagre soil ; and
as, in North Tynedale at least, very little effort is
made at tillage, a great surplus population has to
find its subsistence by raiding the country outside
the valley bounds.^ In Redesdale, although it is
reported to have the poorer soil of the two, there
is more tillage, and more wealth lawfully acquired.
But in both valleys the surplus population lives by
^ Hodgson's Nor thttmber land. III. ii. pp. 171-248.
2 Pp. 233, 237-8. The Commission reports 1500 able-bodied men,
ready for war and robbery, inhabiting the two valleys.
164 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
raiding the settled country to the east. The raiders
were in close league with those of Scottish Liddesdale,
where a very similar state of society existed. The
national feud was often set aside for the convenience
of uniting to prey upon the honest roen of the two
kingdoms. Thieves, when hard pressed by a foray
of the King's officers, could cross the border at
Deadwater, and defy extradition.
Indeed the only racial and national allegiance
which the warrior of these districts really felt, was
loyalty towards his own clan. Family feeling served,
more than anything else, to protect culprits and defy
the law. Stolen property could not be followed up
and recovered in the thieving valleys, because each
raider was protected by the revengeful jealousy of a
large and warlike tribe. The inhabitants of these
valleys were grouped in communities based upon
the tie of kinship. Small families came for protection
under the rule of the Charltons, who answered for
half of North Tyne. The Halls, Reeds, Hedleys,
and Fletchers of Redesdale, the Charltons, Dodds,
Robsons, and Milbournes of North Tynedale, were
the real political units within a society that had little
other organisation. The King, when he raised taxes
from these districts, sometimes secured the tribute
through the agency of the great families.^ They
united for raids into foreign territory ; but they
stained their native valley with the blood of intestine
* Pp. 229-235 and 243-4, sub. 1550.
THE MIDDLE MARCHES 165
feuds. The most famous of these is celebrated in the
Ballad of Percy Reed, whom the " fause-hearted
'Ha's'" did to death at the famous hunting, high
in Bateinghope, under the Carter Fell.^
In North Tynedale, more entirely given over to
thieving, and less addicted to agriculture than Redes-
dale, the whole valley wore a barbarous and martial
appearance. The clans lived in strong houses, placed
in positions of natural security among the soft deep
mosshags up on the moor, or behind " banks and
"cleughs of wood wherein of old time for the more
"strength great trees have been felled and laid so
"athwart the ways and passages, that in divers places
" (unless it be by such as know and have experience
" of those strait and evil ways and passages) it will
" be hard for strangers having no knowledge thereof
" to pass thereby in any order and especially on
"horseback." In this savage and unsettled com-
munity, preyed upon by its own feuds, by the Scots
and by the English Keeper from Chipchase, the
military architects built these " strong houses " not
of stone but of great oak beams. (Were there
then oak forests in the neighbourhood?) "The
"outer sides or walls be made of great sware {sic)
" oak trees, strongly bound together with great tenors
"of the same, so thick mortressed that it will be
"very hard without great force and labour to break
^ Apparently because Percy Reed had, in an evil hour, allowed himself
to be made Royal Keeper of his native valley of Redesdale.
1 66 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
"or cast down any of the said houses ; the timber as
"well of the said walls as roofs be so great, and
" covered most part with turfs and earth that they will
"not easily burn." In Redesdale the houses were
"not set in so strong places as they be in Tynedale,
"nor the passages into them so strait or dangerous."^
By the pleasant banks of Coquet, another state of
society was found. Coquetdale was not, like the two
thieving valleys, cut off by any moorland rampart
from the rest of Northumberland. Once the river
emerges from the hills at Alwynton, it flows down
through fertile country direct to the sea. Civilisation
had therefore spread quietly up along the course of
its tranquil waters, past Brinkburn and Rothbury,
up through the plain of Harbottle, till it reached the
foot of the hills. So it is natural that the Commis-
sioners should have to report : " The people of
" Coquetdale be best prepared for defence, and most
"defensible people of themselves, and of the truest
"and best sort of any that do inhabit endlong all the
"frontier or border of the said Middle Marches of
" England." But security went no further up the
stream than Alwynton. The King's Peace did not
extend to the sources of the Coquet and its tribu-
taries, the Alwyn and Usway. These streams come
down through the green Cheviot Hills from the
Border Ridge, curving and sweeping in "great
number of hoops and valleys," as the Commissioners
* Hodgson, III. ii. pp. 232-3, 237, sub. 1542.
THE MIDDLE MARCHES 167
say. This ground of Kidland Lee, the most beautiful
part of the English Border, does not, like the wastes
round Rede Water and North Tyne, consist of long
straight ridges, gradually and slightly raised above
valleys several miles across and prairies of long white
rough grass. The Coquet sources are an exception from
this general character of the Northumbrian scenery ;
their streams come down through green rounded
hills, cutting for themselves winding passages, scarcely
a hundred yards broad, whose high and slippery
walls, clad in turf and bracken, are too steep for the
pedestrian. He is forced to keep either the valley
bottom or the hill top ; and, if he walks along by the
burn bank, he sees nothing but the steep green wall
on each side, and the blue dome of sky above.
This country was considered to contain " reason-
able good pasture," then as now. But, while now
grey stone farms are scattered at intervals of a few
miles along these deep valley bottoms, then no
one dared live in them, for fear of the murderous
raids of the Scots and the men of Redesdale. The
Commissioners attribute some of these difficulties
to the peculiar nature of the ground : —
" The said valleys or hoops of Kydland lie so
" distant and divided by mountains one from another,
" that such as inhabit in one of these hoops, valleys,
" or graynes, can not hear the fray, outcry, or exclama-
" tion of such as dwell in another hoop or valley
" upon the other side of the said mountain, nor come
1 68 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
" or assemble to their assistance in time of necessity.
"Wherefore, we can not find any of the neighbours
"thereabouts willing continually to inhabit or plenish
"within the said ground of Kydland, and especially
" in winter time ; although they might have stone
" houses builded thereupon for their defence, and
"also have the said ground free without paying rent
" for the same. The dangers afore recited be so great
"and manifest." ^
In the summer time, indeed, the law-abiding men
of Coquetdale drove their flocks a-field up these
higher valleys, and lived out in " sheals," watching
them. This practice, then common in Northumber-
land, of " shealing " or " summering," analogous to
the high summer pasturage of Alpine districts, was,
however, impossible round the headwaters of Coquet
and Usway in time of " war or troublous peace."
So, in time of war with Scotland, or in years when
the men of Redesdale were in an evil humour, no
bleating of sheep was heard all the summer long
amid the winding passages of the hills ; and the
blackcock strutted through the bracken on the steep
bank above, and the heron fished beside the sparkling
stream, month after month, undisturbed by man,
save when now and again a hungry spearman
rode swiftly and silently through the silent land.
In happier days to come, these steep, slippery
banks of Alwyn and Usway were hunted by Diana
^ Hodgson, III. ii. 223.
THE MIDDLE MARCHES 169
and the Osbaldistone pack ; and these passages of
the hills were threaded by Andrew Fairservice and
his friends the smugglers, and his enemies the
Jacobites.
A few miles below the place where Coquet and
its tributaries at length break out into the plain,
stand the ruins of Harbottle Castle, on a green hill
by the river. It was from this comparatively well-
ordered and secure district that the short arm of
the King was occasionally extended into Redesdale.
Harbottle Castle was the headquarters of the Keeper
of Redesdale ; he dared live no nearer to the valley
of which he had charge, for fear of the fate that
befell Percy Reed. The Commissioners of 1542
advised, that if thirty horsemen were kept in Harbottle
Castle, ever ready to mount and ride behind the
Keeper over the steep Elsdon Hill into Redesdale,
that turbulent valley might be kept in order. At
Chipchase, fifty mounted men would be required
for like service by the Keeper of North Tynedale.
Meanwhile, stones and mortar were as much required
as men and horses : Harbottle Castle had " for lack
of necessary reparations fallen into extreme ruin
and decay." ^
But, since the impoverished State could not afford
to take these necessary measures to extend its control
1 This was in 1542. In 1550 it had been partly repaired, but had still
no hall, kitchen, or brewhouse, or enough room for prisoners. (Hodgson,
III. ii. pp. 212, 237, 243.)
fjo CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
into the two thieving valleys, it attempted to isolate
them by an elaborate system of local watch and
ward. The farmers and gentlemen bordering along the
lower reaches of Rede Water and North Tyne, were
expected to keep nightly watch at their own expense,
to prevent the thieves from passing down towards
the coast, or into the civilised valleys of Coquet
and Wansbeck. A watch is " to be surely kept upon
the night time, that is to say from the sunset until
the sunrise at diverse places, passages, and fords,
endlong all the said Middle Marches, for the better
preservation of the same from thieves and spoils."
Henry VIII's Commissioners presented him with a
list of the places where two horsemen are supposed
to be stationed every night. Roughly, the line runs
along the water-shed on the top of which the Sting
Cross was so prominent a feature. The charge of
maintaining the watchmen was laid on the men of
this district. The " townships" (some, like Hartington,
Greenleighton, Catcherside, scarcely more than a
group of farm buildings), standing in lonely places
along the eastern slope of the water-shed, had to
maintain the nightly guard for the protection of
the rich seaward districts. Naturally, complaint
and recrimination arose, and the Commissioners of
1542 were faced by an interesting problem of the
proper incidence of local rates. The Borderers of the
hill townships complained, that all the expense of
the ward fell on them, and the advantage to the low
THE MIDDLE MARCHES 171
country. The men of the low country replied, that
the watch was so ill kept, that they themselves had
to maintain night watches in their seaward townships
against the frequent invasions of the men of Redes-
dale and North Tyne.^ We may well believe that
the thieves found it no hard matter to ride eastward
through the line at night, avoiding each of the widely
scattered points where, as all the world knew, two
shivering watchmen were eagerly hoping that day
would dawn before they had met with any unpleasant
encounter. The difficulty of the thieves in effecting
their return journey with large droves of cattle would
no doubt be more severe ; and it was, perhaps, at
this latter part of the "fray" that the watchmen were
expected to make themselves most useful.
The first social and political duty of the English
and Scottish Borderer was to " follow the fray," that
is, to mount at a moment's notice, and ride in pursuit
of plunderers. As the "riding" ballads, such as
Jamie Telfer, show, personal affection was not always
strong enough to induce the farmer, awakened in
the small hours of the morning, to turn out and en-
danger his life on behalf of a neighbour who had
** brought him the fray."
" The sun was na up, but the moon was down,
It was the gryming o' a new fa'n snaw,
Jamie Telfer has run three myles a-foot,
Between the Dodhead and the Stob's Ha'.
^ Hodgson, III. ii. 238-242.
172 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
And when he cam to the fair tower gett,
He shouted aloud, and cried weel hie,
Till out bespak auld Gibby Elliot —
' Wha's this that brings the fraye to me ? '
' It's I, Jamie Telfer o' the fair Dodhead,
And a harried man I think I be !
There's naething left at the fair Dodhead,
But a waefu' wife and bairnies three.'
' Gae seek you succour at Branksome Ha',
For succour ye'se get nane frae me ;
Gae seek your succour where ye paid blackmail.
For, man ! ye ne'er paid money to me.' "
The scene of this suggestive dialogue is laid in
Scotland ; but there must often have been the same
story to tell in Northumberland. The repeated
efforts of the Tudor Government to make the duty
of "following the fray" a State obligation enforceable
by fine, were, in the end, largely successful, though,
even towards the close of Elizabeth's reign, the
average of murders on the English side was
estimated at over a hundred, and the average of
property stolen at over ^10,000, in a year.^
But all this talk of "thieves" is beside the point
which gives value to the history of the Borderland.
What is it that has brought our cultured and com-
mercial society to collect the relics of these cut-
1 Creighton, Historical Essays, "The Northumbrian Border," pp.
256, 263-5.
THE MIDDLE MARCHES 173
throats ? If we ascribe it all to Scott, why did he
make them his stock-in-trade ? It is not that the
moss-troopers can claim any monopoly in robbery
and murder. There is a murder every night in our
evening papers ; and our thefts are too plentiful to
bear recording. If, again, it is armed lawlessness
and cruelty that we want, or the primitive social
state, we can find these in the history of any barbar-
ous people ; and if we want them in a setting of
mountain scenery, there are the Balkans to our hand
to-day. What then was peculiar to the Border life
which Scott celebrated ? It was this : that the
Border people wrote the Border Ballads. Like the
Homeric Greeks, they were cruel, coarse savages,
slaying each other as the beasts of the forest ; and
yet they were also poets who could express in the
grand style the inexorable fate of the individual man
and woman, and infinite pity for all the cruel things
which they none the less perpetually inflicted upon
one another. It was not one ballad-maker alone but
the whole cut-throat population who felt this magna-
nimous sorrow, and the consoling charm of the
highest poetry. A large body of popular ballads
commemorated real incidents of this wild life, or
adapted folklore stories to the places and conditions
of the Border. The songs so constructed on both
sides of the Cheviot Ridge were handed down by
oral tradition among the shepherds, and among the
farm girls who, for centuries, sang them to each
174 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
other at the milking. If the people had not loved
the songs, many of the best would have perished.
The Border Ballads, for good and for evil, express
this society and its quality of mind, as well and truly
as the daily Press and the Music Hall Stage express
that of the majority of the town-dwellers of to-day.
The Border Ballads are distinguished from the
old ballads of South England, similar in form and
often based upon the same folk-legends, by a
tenser poetic strain, and a far deeper melan-
choly. Their more tragic mood may be in some
part due to the real conditions of Hfe prevailing in
the Border country, where violent death dogged
man's footsteps every day. To be a lover in a South
English ballad is to run a fair chance of "living
happily ever afterwards " ; but to assume the part
in a Border Ballad is a desperate undertaking.
No father, mother, brother, or rival will have pity
before it is too late ; they are " more fanged than
wolves and bears." And chance is generally in
league with the Tragic Muse. When her brother
determines to burn Lady Maisry for loving an
Englishman too well. Lord William rides up just
too late to do anything but burn her whole family
in revenge. Even when the ballad ends well, there
has generally been blood shed, as in the original
Lochinvar, which has none of the rollicking canter
and swagger of Scott's modern rendering.^ And the
* /Catherine /anfarie (Aytoun's Ballads, 1858, ii. p. 75).
THE MIDDLE MARCHES 175
best ballads are the most tragic. Something grand
and inevitable, like the doom impending over the
Lion Gate at Mycenae, broods over each of these
stone peel-towers high upon the " bent," and rude
forts of "great svvare oak trees," "covered with
turfs." Even the most wicked and horrible stories
are not sordid, but tragic.
" Why does your brand sae drop wi' blude,
Edward, Edward ?
Why does your brand sae drop wi' blude,
And why sae sad gang ye, O ? "
"01 hae killed my father dear,
Mither, mither;
O I hae killed my father, dear,
Alas ! and wae is me, O ! "
" And what will ye do wi' your tow'rs and your ha',
Edward, Edward?
And what will ye do wi' your tow'rs and your ha'.
That were sae fair to see, O ? "
" I'll let them stand till they doun fa',
Mither, mither ;
I'll let them stand till they doun fa',
For here never mair maun I be, O."
Or again, when Helen of Kirkconnel has been
killed by a shot aimed at her lover, not even a herce
revenge can give him any ease.
" As I went down the water side.
None but my foe to be my guide,
None but my foe to be my guide,
On fair Kirkconnell Lee,
176 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
I lighted down, my sword did draw,
I hack'd him into pieces sma',
I hack'd him into pieces sma',
For her sake that died for me.
I wish I were where Helen lies !
Night and day on me she cries,
And I am weary of the skies.
For her sake that died for me."
Lyke-Wake Dirge is perhaps the most awful and
solemn expression that was ever given to the bar-
barous popular religion of the Dark Ages, as dis-
tinct from the higher flights of more cultivated
Italian and French Catholicism. Yet in nine Border
Ballads out of ten, there is no religious motif ;
and consolation is hardly ever sought in expectation
of a meeting in heaven. The sense of human life,
its passions, its love, its almost invariable tragedy,
seem the abiding thoughts of this savage but great-
souled people. The supernatural world consists of
ghosts of the departed, and of the fairies — those
friends, with whom the poets go on mysterious rides
like that of Thomas the Rhymer.
" O they rade on, and farther on,
And they waded through rivers aboon the knee,
And they saw neither sun nor moon.
But they heard the roaring of the sea.
It was mirk, mirk night, and there was nae stern ^ light.
And they waded thro' red blude to the knee.
For a' the blude that's shed on earth,
Rins through the springs o' that countrie."
^ Stern = star.
THE MIDDLE MARCHES 177
In another ballad, the Queen of Fairies steals a
young mother from a farm to be Elphin Nourice
(Elf nurse) to the little Prince of Fairies. The poor
woman hears out of fairyland a noise of the dear
world she has left, and remembers her own son.
" I heard a cow low, a bonnie cow low,
An' a cow low doun in yon glen ;
Land, lang, will my young son greet,
Or his mither bid him come ben.
" I heard a cow low, a bonnie cow low,
An' a cow low doun in yon fauld ;
Land lang, will my young son greet,
Or his mither take him frae cauld.
" Waken, Queen of Elfan,
An' hear your Nourice moan."
" O moan ye for your meat,
Or moan ye for your fee,
Or moan ye for the ither bounties,
That ladies are wont to gie ? "
" I moan na for my meat,
Nor yet for my fee.
But I mourn for Christen land —
It's there I fain would be."
The Border life, at any rate in its most highly de-
veloped form in the thieving valleys, had no set
object, no political or social end to attain. It was a
life good or bad in itself alone. These people have
left nothing behind, except these ballads, which have
made all their meaningless and wicked ways interest-
ing for all time. Law-making, road-laying, bridge-
M
178 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
building — everything which Carlyle would have ap-
proved— had no place in their ambitions. Their life
was a game with Death, in which each in turn was
sure soon to pay forfeit ; it was played according to
certain rules of family honour, varied and crossed by
lovers' passions. All classes of a sparse population
joined in this game with Death, and relished it as the
poetry and breath of life. It is useless to wish the
conditions of that life back, in the hope of getting
ballads instead of music-hall songs ; men often drive
away cattle without writing immortal poetry, and to
drive cattle and leave the owner dead on his hearth-
stone is in itself a very bad thing.
The inhabitants of the Cheviot Hills to-day are a
fine people, and, upon the whole, greatly preferable
to the moss-troopers. Burns and the Bible long
ago superseded the Ballads ; and vulgarity has not
yet invaded from the cities. In the course of the last
three centuries, the Scottish farmers have moved into
and occupied the English Cheviot valleys. The
origin of this movement is said to have been the
persecution in the "killing times" of Claverhouse,
when a Covenanter had a better chance of safety on
the English side of the Border. But the movement
has not yet come to an end ; and it is difficult to say
how far the inhabitants of Redesdale are descendants
of the Englishmen of the sixteenth century, and how
far of Scottish immigrants.
THE MIDDLE MARCHES 179
The social and religious state of the valley half way
between the Border times and our own, is described
in a most amusing letter written from the fine old
peel-tower of Elsdon, then, as now, used as the
Rectory, where the unfortunate incumbent, Mr.
Dodgson, has been snowed up. He is the best type
of an eighteenth century clergyman and letter-
writer, a worthy contemporary of Sterne and Horace
Walpole. Of course it has never entered his head
that moorland scenery is anything but a horror.^
"There is not a town in all the parish, except
" Elsdon itself be called one ; the farmhouses, where
" the principal families live, are five or six miles distant
" from one another ; and the whole country looks like a
" desert. The greater part of the richest farmers are
" Scotch dissenters, and go to a meeting-house at
" Birdhope Craig, about ten miles from Elsdon ; how-
"ever, they don't interfere in ecclesiastical matters, or
" study polemical divinity. Their religion descends
" from father to son, and is rather a part of the personal
" estate than the result of reasoning, or the effect of
"enthusiasm. Those who live near Elsdon come to
" the church, those at a greater distance towards the
" west go to the meeting-house at Birdhope Craig ;
" others, both Churchmen and Presbyterians, at a very
'< great distance, go to the nearest church or conventicle
"in the neighbouring parish. There is a very good
" understanding between the parties ; for they not only
^ Northumberland Table Book. Legendary Division, vol. i. p. 232.
i8o CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
" intermarry with each other, but frequently do penance
" together in a white sheet with a white wand, barefoot,
"in one of the coldest churches in England, and at
"the coldest seasons of the year. I dare not finish
" the description for fear of bringing on a fit of the
" ague ; indeed, the ideas of sensation are sufficient to
"starve a man to death without having recourse to
" those of reflection. If I was not assured by the best
"authority upon earth that the world was to be de-
"stroyed by fire, I should conclude that the day of
" destruction is at hand, and brought on by means of
" an agent very opposite to that of heat. There is not
"a single tree or hedgerow within twelve miles to
" break the force of the wind ; it sweeps down like a
"deluge from hills capped with everlasting snow, and
" blasts almost the whole country into one continued
"barren desert. The whole country is doing pen-
" ance in a white sheet ; for it began to snow on
" Sunday night, and the storm has continued ever
" since."
Yet, for all this, Elsdon lays firm hold on the
imagination of those who are not intimidated by
moorland scenery, and who love the Northumbrian
ridges. It remains to-day as the spiritual capital of
the Middle Marches, the yet unviolated shrine of the
tradition of the English Border. It served the Redes-
dale clans for their common place of burial and of
religious rites, their market and assembly place, as
Bellingham served the men of North Tynedale. But,
THE MIDDLE MARCHES i8i
whereas Bellingham has now a railway, and has
suffered change. Elsdon is the same as ever. It Hes
low in a green hollow, visible from many surrounding
heights ; and one glance at it from far off recalls the
life of innumerable generations. The famous Mote
Hills, green mound-circles towering above the burn,
tell that Elsdon was the capital of Redesdale in days
when neither Scotland nor England existed, before
the Romans camped in the valley, and long before
the monks of Lindisfarne, in their wandering flight
from the Danes, halted for a while with the relics of
St. Cuthbert on what is now the site of Elsdon
Church. That church, beneath which lie the dead of
Otterburne, and the peel-tower thrusting up through
the scant trees its battlements and its stone roof, call
back the Border life, while the stone houses scattered
round the broad village green mark the civilising
progress of the eighteenth century,
Otterburne, the glorified Border foray of 1388, was
fought a few miles higher up the Rede valley. It was
there that they " bickered on the bent." The Douglas
himself had come over the Border with an army of
picked men, burnt Northumberland and Durham,
and had, before the closed gates of Newcastle, given
Harry Percy a challenge to follow and fight him
before he recrossed the Border. It was chivalry and
love of the game, and no military considerations, that
made Douglas wait for Percy ; he occupied an old
tribal entrenchment, still clearly traceable on a knoll
1 82 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
above Greenchesters, beyond Otterburne. It was
chivalry that made Hotspur attack the camp at
nightfall, when his English bowmen could not show
their skill, when all his men were wearied with a
forced march of thirty miles that day from Newcastle,
when reinforcements under the Bishop of Durham
were scarcely twelve hours behind.^ The result was
the midnight battle of heroes, ending in an English
rout. Douglas was killed ; but Hotspur was taken,
and the remainder of his men fled back past Elsdon,
hotly pursued, but often turning fiercely on their
pursuers. As the August day dawned, they were
struggling up the side of the high ridges, to south and
east of Elsdon, in broken parties of wounded and
wearied men. Some of the fliers and pursuers were
met by the Bishop of Durham's forces, who had
marched hard over the moors and streams by the
light of that moon which was glinting on the flash
of swords at Otterburne.
The skeletons of a regiment of men, mostly in the
prime of life, many of them with skulls cleft, have
been found under Elsdon Church, and are believed
to be the English killed on that famous night. The
main part of the aisle was built about that date,
perhaps in memorial of them. But at the western
end there still stand two massive Norman pillars,
black and dripping with age ; beneath them, we
^ A good authority on the locality, time, and circumstances of the
battle, is Robert White's Battle of Otterburn, 1857.
THE MIDDLE MARCHES 183
may fairly suppose, were laid out the long lines
of the dead, brought there on the
"biers
Of birch and hazel grey,"
which the mourners had hastily torn from the clefts
of the burns that empty themselves into the Rede.
And there is preserved in the church a slab of
time-blackened stone, whereon is carved, in rude and
barbarous fashion, a nameless knight in the armour
of that time. The church is the tomb of the old
Border life ; and the hills around are the everlasting
monument. One form of life has passed away ; but
another has come to take its place. As we climb the
steep green road again towards the Gibbet at Sting
Cross, we see the clouds still moving along the far
horizon ridges ; the sun sets over Carter Fell ; the
stars come out against the blackness :
" Life glistens on the river of the death."
IF NAPOLEON HAD WON THE
BATTLE OF WATERLOO ^
The day of the signature of the Convention of
Brussels, June 26, 1815, is the point of time that
divides into two strangely contrasted halves the
greatest career of modern times, and ushers in
the reign of the Napoleon of Peace. When, in that
little room in the Hotel de Ville, now filled every
morning by crowds of tourists, the red-coated
patrician, who had once been regarded by his partial
countrymen as the rival of the lord of armies, sat
listening in proud and stoical humiliation to the
torrent of words poured forth in dispraise of war
by his perambulatory host, who, with clenched fists,
invoked the Goddess of Peace, the laconic English-
man probably thought that he was present at a
Napoleonic farce of the usual character. He did not
guess that his conqueror had in all truth drained the
cup of Peace, a draught as bitter to Napoleon as
Defeat was bitter to his conquered foe. Wellington,
indeed, during the terrible week between the battle
and the Convention, had not uttered one complaint
' In July 1907 the Westminster Gazette offered a prize for an essay on
this subject. This was the successful essay.
IF NAPOLEON HAD WON WATERLOO 185
against Bluchcr for breaking tryst, nor shown to
his staff-officers one sign of his agony — beyond the
disuse of his customary oaths.
A new Napoleon had been evolved, the Napoleon
of Peace, a mere shadow, in spiritual and intellectual
force, of his former self. The Buonaparte of 1796
would have urged the advance of Ney's columns
until they had destroyed the last of Wellington's
regiments, and would himself, with the bulk of his
army, have fallen on the traces of Blucher, instead
of suffering him to effect a junction with the Austrians
and Russians, and so present a barrier to the French
reconquest of Germany. Nor would the Napoleon
of 1813, who refused, in defeat, the most favourable
offers of a settlement, have hesitated after such a
victory as that of Mont St. Jean to undertake with
a light heart the subjugation of Central and Eastern
Europe. But the Napoleon of 1815, one week after
his triumphal entry into Brussels, was offering to
Wellington the same facilities to evacuate the seat
of war which the English general had offered at
Cintra, seven years before, to the defeated lieutenant
of the Emperor. And this unexpected clemency was
extended to England, in order as easily and as
quickly as possible to remove from the scene of
affairs and from the counsels of the Continental
monarchs the paymaster and inveterate instigator of
war, and so to clear the stage for Napoleon and
the time-serving Metternich to arrange by collusion
1 86 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
a permanent and lasting peace for all Europe, not
exclusive of England herself.
Whence came this extraordinary change in the
intentions, one might say in the character, of the
French Emperor ? The history of what passed in
the headquarters at Brussels between June i6 and 26
can never be fully known, though whole libraries have
been written upon the subject. Secret agents of
Metternich had been in Brussels as early as June 14,
with orders, in case Wellington were defeated,
instantly to offer Napoleon the Rhine frontier and
the bulk of the Italian Peninsula, and to represent to
him how utterly impossible it was that he should hold
down Germany after the national movement of 1813.
The latter argument, though based upon a just insight
into the condition of the Fatherland, would have had
little effect upon the man to whom it was addressed
had he been sure of support from France herself.
But, so far from being dazzled by the news of Mont
St. Jean, Paris, on June 20, formed a determined
alliance of all classes and all parties — Liberals,
Jacobins, Royalists, and old servants of the Empire —
to insist upon peace. The representatives commis-
sioned by the Chambers and by other bodies, official
and unofficial alike, were welcomed in the Belgian
capital, and supported in their petition by all the
marshals and by almost every superior officer. But
Napoleon's will, it appears, was not finally overcome
until the great review of June 24, held outside the
IF NAPOLEON HAD WON WATERLOO 187
town for the purpose of testing the attitude of the
common soldiers. Though most of them were
veterans, they had too lately rejoined the camp to be
altogether insensible to the national feeling ; many of
them had come out to liberate France, not to subju-
gate Europe — a task which no longer seemed as easy
as before the days of Borodino and Leipzig. The
long shout for " Peace " that ran down the lines seems
to have dazed the Emperor. He spoke no word to
the assembled troops to thank them for the late
victory, rode slowly back like one in a trance, dis-
mounted in the square, passed through the ante-
chamber staring vacantly at his marshals and Ministers
as if on men whom he had never seen before. As he
reached the threshold of his cabinet his eye lit upon
the Mameluke by the door, who alone in all the crowd
was gazing with intense devotion on his master. The
Corsican stopped, and still in a reverie, interpellated
the Oriental : " The Franks are tired of war, and we
two cannot ride out alone. Besides, we are growing
old. One grows old and dies. The Pyramids they
grow old, but they do not die." Then, with intense
energy, he added : " Do you think one will be
remembered after forty centuries ? " He stood for a
moment, as if waiting for an answer from the mute,
then dashed through the door, flung himself at the
table, and began dictating messages of peace to
Wellington and the allied Sovereigns.
Napoleon's physical condition probably contributed
1 88 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
no less than the attitude of the French army and
people to the formation of his great resolution ; during
the critical week, the decision between peace and
war seems to have been as much as he could attend
to in his waking hours, which were greatly curtailed
by his peculiar malady. Hence it was that he made
no serious effort to follow Bliicher's retreat through
Namur, beyond leaving a free hand to Grouchy.
Though he was not yet sufficiently cognisant of
his growing feebleness to delegate to anyone either
his military or political duties, he seems to have been
subconsciously aware that the two together were
beyond his strength. It is, therefore, not strange
that he decided to accept the Rhine frontier and the
hegemony in the Italian Peninsula as the basis of
a permanent peace, and that his ever-increasing
lassitude of body kept him faithful to the decision
during the last twenty years of his life.
Those years were a period of but slight change
for Europe. Monarchs and peoples were too much
exhausted to engage in war for the alteration of
frontiers ; internal reform or revolution was rendered
impossible by the great standing armies, which the
very existence of Napoleon on the French throne,
valetudinarian though he was known to be, rendered
necessary, or at least excusable, in England, Austria,
and the German States. Hatred of the crowned
Jacobin, and fear of renewed French invasions, gave
to the Governments of the ancien regime a measure
IF NAPOLEON HAD WON WATERLOO 189
of popularity with the middle classes which they
would not otherwise have enjoyed ; it has even been
suggested that reform might have made some notable
step forward in England within twenty years of
Mont St. Jean, had the great Tory champion succeeded
in overthrowing the revolutionary Emperor on the
field of battle.
As it was, the condition of England was most
unhappy. In spite of the restoration of trade with
the Continent, impeded indeed by the extravagantly
high tariffs due to Napoleon's military ideas of
economic science, in spite of our continued supremacy
at sea, the distress grew yearly more intolerable, both
among the rural and industrial populations. The
taxation necessary for the maintenance of both fleet
and army on a war footing allowed no hope of
amelioration ; yet while Napoleon lived and paraded
his own army and fleet as the expensive toys of
his old age, the Tory Ministers could see no possibility
of reduction on their part. Probably they were glad
of the excuse, for the great army enabled them to
defy the Reformers, who became ever more violent
as year after year passed by without prospect of
change. If Mont St. Jean had been a victory for
England, and if it had been followed by that general
disarmament to which Wellington himself had looked
forward as the natural consequence of Napoleon's
downfall, Catholic Emancipation must have been
granted to Ireland, and this concession would at
I90 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
least have averted the constant revolts and massacres
in that unhappy country which so sorely tempted
Napoleon to resume hostilities during the last ten
years of his life. In Great Britain, where starvation
and repression were the order of the day, there
occurred in 1825 the ill-advised but romantic rebellion
of Lord Byron, in whose army the rank and file
consisted almost entirely of working men, and the
leaders (except Napier) had no more knowledge of
war than was possessed by such ruffians as Thistle-
wood and the ex-pirate Trelawny. The savage re-
prisals of Government established the blood-feud
between one half of England and the other. The
execution of Lord Byron made a greater noise in
the world than any event since the fall of the Bastille,
though it was not immediately followed by political
changes. After two years of terror. Canning, who
was always suspected by his colleagues of semi-
popular sympathies, restored partial freedom of the
Press in 1827, and it became apparent in the literature
of the next decade that all young men of spirit were
no longer anti-Jacobins — no longer even Whigs, but
Radicals. The worship of the dead poet went side
by side with the worship of the living. The writings
of Shelley, especially after his long imprisonment,
obtained a popularity which was one of the most
curious symptoms of the time. His ^^ Men of Englatid,
wherefore plough ?" was sung at all Radical gatherings,
and his ode on the death of Napoleon {The Dead
IF NAPOLEON HAD WON WATERLOO 191
Anarch, 1836) passed through twenty-five editions
in a year. The younger literary stars, like Tennyson
and Arthur Hallam, blazed with revolutionary ardour.
Excluded from Oxford and Cambridge, the Dissenters
and Radicals formed a University at Manchester,
which soon almost monopolised the talent of the
country. Meanwhile serious politicians like Lord
John Russell and the irrepressible Mr. Brougham
abandoned the older Whig creed and declared for
Universal Suffrage. No wise man, in the year after
Napoleon's death, would have foretold with confidence
whether England was destined to tread the path of
revolution or to continue in the beaten track of
tyranny and obscurantism. At least, it was clear
that there was no longer any third way open to her,
and that the coming era would be stained with blood
and violence. Whiggery died with Grey — that pathetic
and futile figure, who had waited forty years in vain.
The English character was no longer one of com-
promise ; it was being forced by foreign circum-
stances into another and more violent mould.
Similarly in the Continental States outside the
limits of the Napoleonic Empire, the ancien regime
was not only triumphant but to some extent popular
and national, because the late persecutor of the
German and Spanish peoples still remained as their
dangerous neighbour, and was still by far the most
powerful prince in Europe. In Spain the Liberals
and Freethinkers were extirpated with an efficiency
192 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
which Torquemada might have approved ; the In-
quisition was indeed abolished in consequence of
Napoleon's threat of war in 1833, a year in which
the Tories were unable to give Spain diplomatic
support, because the execution of the eccentric
"gypsy-Englishman" for smuggling Bibles into
Andalusia had raised a momentary storm among
their Evangelical supporters in the House and
country. But the disappearance of the Inquisition
made no real difference to the methods of Church
and State in Spain, and the diplomatic incident
only served, as it was intended, to restore the old
Emperor's popularity with the French Liberals.
Meanwhile the revolted Spanish colonies in South
America continued their efforts for freedom with
ever-increasing success until the interference of the
English army, sent out by Government on pure anti-
Jacobin principles, against the wish and the interest
of the British merchants trading in those parts.
" We must preserve," said Castlereagh, " the balance
between monarchy and Republicanism in the New
World as in the Old." But not enough troops could
be spared from policing the British Islands to do
more than prolong the agony of the Transatlantic
struggle. The vast expanses of the Pampas became
a permanent Field of Mars, where Liberal exiles and
adventurers of all countries, principally English and
Italian, side by side with the well-mounted Gauchos,
waged a ceaseless guerilla war on the English and
IF NAPOLEON HAD WON WATERLOO 193
Spanish regulars. Here Napier's brothers avenged
his death on the army of which they had once been
the ornaments ; and Murat, riding-whip in hand,
was seen at the head of many a gallant charge, lead-
ing on the Italians whose idol he had now become
in either hemisphere. " The free life of the Pampas "
became to the young men of Europe the symbol of
that spiritual and political emancipation which could
be realised only in exile and secured in rebellion and
in war. Hence it is that the note of the Pampas
is as prevalent as the note of Byron in the literature
and art of that epoch.
In Germany the national hopes of union and
liberty were cheated by the monarchs, who continued
however, to enjoy safety, prestige, and the bodyguard
of those great standing armies which were necessary
to secure French respect for the Rhine frontier. The
reforms previously effected in those German States
which had been either subject to Napoleon's rule or
moved by his example, were permitted to remain,
wherever they made for the strength of the monarchic
principle. The Prussian peasants were not thrust
back into serfdom ; the reformed Civil Service was
kept in some of the "Westphalian" States ; the Act of
Mediation and the Abolition of the Prince-Bishoprics
were maintained for the benefit of the larger princes.
But all traces of the Code Napoleon were abolished
in Hesse-Cassel and Hanover ; while the University
and National movements were effectively suppressed
194 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
throughout the Fatherland under Austrian influence,
paramount since the faikire of Blucher in Flanders
and the deal between Metternich and Napoleon at
the Conference of Vienna in 1815. If Prussia
obtained nothing else, she recovered her share of
Poland, whose cries were smothered by the Christian
Powers of the East as easily as Greece was put down
by the Turk.
The only Germans who were at once contented and
well governed were those on the left bank of the
Rhine, who continued to be, in peace as in war, the
quietest and most loyal of all Napoleon's subjects.
The French were less easy to satisfy ; they had,
indeed, forced their lord to make peace, but could
they also compel him to grant that measure of liberty
which they now claimed ? The solution of that
question would scarcely have been possible except by
violent means had the Emperor retained half of his
old health and vigour. But it was solved provision-
ally from year to year, because the energies of the
autocrat decreased in almost exact proportion to the
increase of his subjects' demand for freedom. He
cared not who wielded powers which he was no
longer in a condition to exercise himself, and was
ready, out of sheer indifference, to hand them scorn-
fully over to Ministers more or less in sympathy with
the Chambers. So long as he could keep his own
eye on the censorship, it was rigid ; but when he
became too ill to read anything except the most
IF NAPOLEON HAD WON WATERLOO 195
important despatches, the censorship was again as
feebly administered as in the days of the last two
Bourbons. Under these conditions of irritating but
ineffectual repression, French literature and thought
were stimulated into a life almost as flourishing as in
the days of the Encyclopaedists. The Romantic
movement undermined the Imperial idea with the
intellectuals ; the " breath of the Pampas " was felt
in the Qiiartier Latin. It was in vain that the police
broke the busts of Byron and forbade plays in which
the unities were violated.
Yet as long as Napoleon lived and let live the
Liberals, the quarrel of the ruled against their ruler
v/as but half serious. The movement towards a fresh
revolution was rather a preparation for his death than
a very deliberate disloyalty to the man who had saved
France from the ancien regime. And whatever the
W'Orkmen and students might think, the peasants and
soldiers regarded the political and social condition cf
France after Mont St. Jean as almost perfect. The
soldiers were still the favourites of Government ; the
peasants at length tilled in peace and security the
lands which their fathers had seized from the nobles
and the clergy. The religion of the vast majority of
Frenchmen was respected, but the priest was con-
fined to the church ; the home and the women
belonged to the father of the family, and the school
to the State.
Indeed, the chief cause of complaint against
196 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
Napoleon's government, in the eyes of the majority
of his subjects, was not political, social, or religious,
but administrative. The executive machine at Paris,
to which the life of the remotest hamlets was *' mor-
tised and adjoined," worked with an inefficiency
resultant on the bad health of the autocrat. His
personal attention to business became more and more
irregular, and since the ineradicable tradition of the
Imperial service was to wait upon his initiative,
France was scarcely better governed from the Tuileries
in 1820 than she had been in 1807 from the camp-fires
of Poland.
in the treaties of Autumn 1815 the wily Metternich
had succeeded, by a masterpiece of cunning, in re-
taining the Venetian territories for Austria as the
price of abandoning at the conference the claims of
Prussia to expansion in Germany. As in Northern
Europe the Rhine, so in Italy the Mincio, became the
geographic boundary between the Napoleonic system
and the ancien regime — both as yet rather feebly
threatened by the rising spirit of Italian nationality.
Murat, who had by his recent conduct fairly sacri-
ficed the goodwill of both parties, lost his kingdom
and fled to South America. No one dared to proposF
to Napoleon the restoration of the temporal power
of the Pope ; it had, indeed, no more claim to recog-
nition than that of the Prince-Bishops, whose recently
secularised territories none of the German Princes
proposed to restore. Sicily, protected by the British
IF NAPOLEON HAD WON WATERLOO 197
ships, remained to the House of Bourbon. From the
moment that the signature of peace removed the
fear of the French invasion, British influence waned
at Palermo, and the old methods of Sicilian despotism
returned. But the fact that the King of Sicily was
obliged by the Powers to renounce all his claims
to the throne of Naples stood him in good stead
with his insular subjects, whose jealousy was ap-
peased by this act of separation.
All the Italian Peninsula, except the territory of
Venice, was subject to the unifying influence of the
French Imperial system. The Code Napoleon, the
encouragement of the middle class, the abeyance
of clerical influence in government and education
in favour of military and official ideals, continued
as before the peace. The Clerical and Liberal forces,
still divided by the deadliest enmity, which would
certainly break out in bloodshed if the foreigner were
ever to be expelled from Italy, were alike hostile to
the French. But, whereas the Clericals hoped to
restore the ancien regime, either by extending the
Austrian dominions or calling back the native Princes,
and especially the Pope, the Liberals, on the other
hand, dreamed of an Italian Republic. These two
movements were represented to Italy and to the
world, the one by the Prince of the House of Savoy,
the hope of the reactionaries ; and the other by the
son of the Genoese doctor, the founder of the formid-
able " Societa Savonarola," in which many of the rising
198 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
generation hastened to enlist themselves. In 1832 both
these romantic young men fell victims to Napoleon's
police; Charles Albert was detected in disguise in Turin,
and suffered the fate of the Due d'Enghien. Mazzini,
who had the year before escaped with difficulty from
the Venetian Alps, where he had raised the national
flag against Austria, attempted a rising against
Napoleon in the streets of Genoa, but being opposed
by the Italian soldiery, who found all that they wanted
in the existing regime, was captured and shot, with
twelve of his followers.
The executions of the Savoyard Prince and the
Genoese prophet served to remind Europe that
Napoleon, in his old age, still remained, as in his
youth, the enemy alike of the ancien regime and of
democratic liberty. Which of the two would be
the chief gainer by his death it was impossible to
predict.
On the evening of June 4, 1836, Napoleon was
presiding, with even more than his habitual invalid's
lethargy, at one of his Councils of State. The latest
reports from Italy were presented, and a closer entente
with the Austrian police was under discussion. The
Emperor had been sitting, silent and distracted, his
head sunk on his breast. Suddenly the word " Italy"
penetrated to his consciousness. He looked up with
fire in his eyes. " Italy ! " he said ; " we march to-
morrow. The army of the Alps will deserve well of
the Republic." Then, more distractedly, he murmured :
IF NAPOLEON HAD WON WATERLOO 199
" I must leave Josephine behind. She will not care."
He had often of late been talking thus of his first
Empress, whom he seemed to imagine to be some-
where in the palace, but unwilling to see him. It
was the custom of the Council, dictated by the
physicians, to adjourn as soon as he mentioned her
name. The Ministers therefore retired.
The rest of the story can best be told by M. Ville-
bois, physician of the Imperial Household :
"While the Council sat I was walking in the
"Tuileries Gardens below. It was a hot and silent
"night of June. The city was at rest and the trees
" slept with her. Suddenly from the open window
" of the Council Chamber, a noise, inconceivably un-
" melodious, makes itself heard. I look up, and behold
"the Emperor standing alone at the balcony, with
"the lights behind him framing him like a picture.
"With the gestures of a wild animal just set free, he
" is intoning, in a voice of the most penetrating dis-
"cord, the Revolutionary hymn of France, which he
"has forbidden under penalty of the law to the use
"of his subjects. But to him, I know it, it is not a
" hymn of revolution but a chant dii depart. I rush
" upstairs, and find a group of Ministers and lackeys
" trembling outside the door. No one dares enter.
" ' Doctor,' said old Marshal , ' he sang that cursed
"song like that the night before we crossed into
"Russia. On that occasion we stood in the room
"below and trembled, and one told me that he had
200 CLIO, AND OTHER ESSAYS
"sung it thus, in solitude, on the night before he
"first crossed into Italy.'
" Pushing past the brave old man, I opened the door
" and entered alone. The sound had now ceased, but
" the song had penetrated through the summer night,
"and in the Rue de Rivoli a drunken ouvrier had
"caught it up and was thundering it out. 1 looked
"round for my master, and did not at first see him.
" Suddenly I perceived that Napoleon was lying dead
"at my feet. I heard the oaths of the ouvrier as the
"police seized him under the arcade."
THE END
Printed by Ballantvne, Hanson is' Co.
at Paul's Work, Edinburgh
/ X^Jn. X
RETURN TO DESK FROM WHICH BORRL
14 r ' ^"''■"
RETURN CIRCULATION DEPARTMENT
T0»^ 202 Main Library
LOAN PERIOD 1
HOME USE
2
3
4
5
6
ALL BOOKS AAAY BE RECALLED AFTER 7 DAYS
1 -month loans may be renewed by calling 642-3405
6-month loans may be recharged by bringing books to Circulation Desk
Renewals and recharges may be made 4 days prior to due date
DUE AS STAMPED BELOW
OCT 20 197?
Ktu gilt OCT 2
W$
^ CO I
nn
08. n If!!3^1»0 3^L
m^m. mn'^^
2 7 1998
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
FORM NO. DD6, 60m, 1 1 /78 BERKELEY, CA 94720
®s
LD21A-60ni-6,'69
(J9096sl0)476-A-32
General Library
University of California
Berkeley
C0SSD7355M
/
J m
»
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY