Skip to main content

Full text of "Coal resources of Illinois"

See other formats


IMN  53 

a, 3 


tool  SjuOOU^ 


ILLINOIS  STATE  GEOLOGICAL  SURVEY 

John  C.  Fry*,  Chief 


ILLINOIS    MINERALS   NOTE   53 


COAL   RESOURCES   OF   ILLINOIS 


M.   E.   Hopkins  and  J.  A.   Simon 


URBANA,  ILLINOIS  61801 


JANUARY    1974 


*Vl 


ILLINOIS  STATE  GEOLOGICAL  SURVEY 


3  3051  00005  9042 


COAL  RESOURCES  OF  ILLINOIS* 


M.   E.    Hopkins   and  Jack  A.    Simon 


COAL  RESERVES  IN  ILLINOIS 

Illinois  is  blessed  with  abundant  coal,  the  fuel  that  at  present 
represents  the  nation's  best  hope  of  becoming  more  self-sufficient  in  energy 
production  in  the  future.   Coal -bearing  Pennsylvanian  rocks  underlie  about 
65  percent  of  the  state  of  Illinois  (36,806  out  of  a  total  of  56,UOO  square 
miles),  appearing  in  all  or  parts  of  86  of  the  state's  102  counties  (fig.  l) . 

Compared  to  the  other  states,  Illinois  is  in  an  enviable  position 
in  regard  to  coal  reserves  (table  l).   It  has  the  largest  reserves  of  bitu- 
minous coal  of  any  state  and  is  surpassed  in  total  reserves  only  by  North 
Dakota  and  Montana,  which  have  large  quantities  of  lower  rank  lignite  and 
subbituminous  coals.   Although  large  quantities  of  reserves  in  the  western 
states  lie  at  shallow  depths,  a  significant  amount  are  coals  that  lie  too 
deep  for  strip  mining  but  still  would  be  difficult  to  mine  by  underground 
methods . 

Long-term  and  continuing  studies  of  Illinois  coal  reserves  by  the 
Illinois  State  Geological  Survey  have  amassed  a  fund  of  data  on  Illinois  coal 
reserves  that  is  extremely  detailed  and  comprehensive.   An-  estimate  of  Illi- 
nois coal  reserves  was  published  in  1952  and  has  been  supplemented  by  more  re- 
cent material  for  various  parts  of  the  state.   Coal  reserves  have  been  esti- 
mated for  79  Illinois  counties  (Cady  et  al. ,  1952;  Clegg,  196l,  1972;  Hopkins, 
1968;  Reinertsen,  I96U;  Searight  and  Smith,  1969 ;  Smith,  1957,  1958,  196l,  1968 
Smith  and  Berggren,  1963).   In  October  1973,  h6   mines  were  operating  in  the 
state — 21  underground  and  25  strip  mines.   Preliminary  figures  show  Illinois 
produced  about  61,31^,107  tons  of  coal  in  1973. 


*From  a  paper  presented  at  the  First  Annual  Illinois  Energy  Conference  at  the  University  of 
Illinois  at  Chicago  Circle,  June  13-15,  1973. 

-  1  - 


-   2   - 


EH 

CO  ITN 
VO 
O  ON 
W  H 
EH 


H   O 


CO 

rt 

CO 

UN 

o 

o 

rH 

T 

O 

rt 

XJ 

o 

o 

O  '-O    o 

O 

o 

X) 

o 

UN 

UN 

O 

O 

O 

O 

rt 

ON 

O 

o 

O 

h- 

[*- 

.:-■ 

UN 

-: 

o 

^H 

CM 

CO 

m 

rt 

o 

in 

O    J-    MD 

o 

-=f 

CM 

t 

rH 

ON 

CO 

CO 

O 

rH 

NO 

ON 

vo 

r- 

O 

t- 

co 

t— 

UN 

x, 

CM 

ON 

CO 

o 

NO     O     CO 

Cxj 

o 

UN 

K\ 

f- 

UN 

CM 

t— 

NO 

rt 

o 

■  n 

-.-\ 

rt 

r- 

■    ■ 

r- 

CO 

JS- 

1-1 

CM 

r—    rH     MD 

•"* 

o 

h-\ 

ON 

CO 

ON 

MD 

cr^ 

UN 

VO 

30 

VO 

UN 

^ 

K> 

,_, 

,_, 

CM 

3 

J- 

vo 

o 

vo 

Os 

rH 

00     CM     O 

CM 

KN 

t— 

rH 

c- 

0- 

ON 

rH 

CM 

CM 

CO 

CM 

VC 

■'■'■, 

r<> 

CM 

KN 

CM 

r—        •-< 

rt 

UN 

CM 

O 

CM 

no 

vo 

o 

rt 

CO 

KN 

-It 

rH       O 

rt 

NO 

NO 

UN 

r- 

rH 

^ 

St 

DO 

CM 

.a- 

ir> 

KN 

,-" 

d 

J-      rH 

ON 

d 

d 

CO 

t^- 

rH 

ON 

st 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

I 

UN 

O* 

CM 

O 

o 

f-, 

ft 

CM 

7 

o 

o 

-r 

1 

rt 
••-  ■ 

'CO 

-o 

CO 

o 

UN 

KN 
rt 
VO 

KN 

1 
1 

CM 

rt 
MD 

o 

UN 

o 

CM 

r*N   ON 

NO      Li"N         t 

UN 

CM     O 

ON    C^ 
MD     CM        1 
MD 

O* 

CM 

1 

fN 

rt 

CO 

CM 

-o 
J- 

O* 

ON 

rt 

ON 

1 

CO 

UN 

UN 

d 

CO 
KN 

rt 

• 

ON 
ON 

KN 

1 
1 

1 

1 

CM 

ON 

rt 

ON 

UN 

1 

I 

VO 

UN 

o 

ON 

J- 
KN 

CM 

t> 

■■     t 

o 

00 

rH 

o 

KN 

t— 

ya 

C^    O 

f*N 

CM 

NO 

C— 

rt 

l>- 

rt 

d 

: 

r- 

:- 

CO 

■'■ 

r 

CO 

MD    O 

UN 

r— 

t>- 

ON 

C— 

co 

CM 

1 

rt 

1 

I 

t- 

rt 

ITN 

C\J 

c- 

1 

UN   J"        1 

1 

CO 

t- 

1 

00 

1 

1 

rt 

1 

C\J 

oo 

r- 

KN 

rt 

c- 

UN 

CM 

CM 

sfi 

o 

=1 

CM 

MD 

ON 

UN 

KN 

o 

f\ 

"■ 

" 

ON 

-=t 

ON 

u  ■ 

VO 

VO 

rt 

■; 

O 

o 

UN 

NO 

UN 

CO 

o 

O 

"- 

^ 

o 

d 

'•■  s 

- 

CO 

UN 

d 

d 

L^^ 

d 

rH 

o 

f- 

1 

■ 

1 

t- 

1 

r- 

on 

in 

5 

1 

1      t—       1 

1 

<7N 

ON 

1 

1 

1 

1 

ON 

1 

1 

o 

^r 

co 

r- 

-I 

O 

CM 

c 

KN 

CM 

OJ 

CO 

ON 
ON 

rt 
CM 

St 

UN 

co 

o 

Lf> 

-3- 

r~- 

'■-■. 

KN 

OO 

O 

j^- 

UN 

CM 

o 

ON 

rH 

ON 

UN 

00 

• 

ON 

'• 

rn 

Vfl 

CO* 

J, 

d 

d 

ON 

DO 

CO 

KN 

VO 

vo 

NO 

lf> 

1 

LT* 

1 

I 

"\ 

& 

1 

KN 

K> 

m 

ON 

1 

1     O       l 

i 

un 

1 

CO 

r- 

h- 

1 

CM 

1 

ON 

I 

KN 

r* 

"^ 

i  . 

O 

r*> 

•^ 

•^ 

^t 

r— 

NO 

'", 

ON 

•""* 

rt 

vo 

r'\ 

CM 

ON 

00 

r— 

1-1 

rt 

CO 

,_ 

oo 

C— 

o 

CO 

MJ 

CM 

CM 

,-, 

ON 

t-- 

ON 

VO 

rt 

CO 

CM 

NN 

co 

-■ 

■■■1 

oo 

zt 

r- 

o 

CO 

st- 

CO 

rt 

o 

i 

UN 

co 

1 

ON 

1 

I 

j- 

1 

^0 

ir« 

CM 

1 

1        ON        | 

i 

NO 

1 

CM 

UN 

1 

CM 

1 

ON 

1 

CM 

CM 

.r\ 

<-o 

KN 

KN 

rt 

CM 

UN 

CM 

UN 

on 

-=f 

CM 

1  . 

KN 

CM 

St 

r- 

r* 

o 

OJ 

o> 

■  a 

CO 

O 

O 

O 

rt 

ON 

,H 

C^ 

C^ 

t— 

^ 

CO 

CO 

ITS 

'^ 

ON  MO 

LfN 

ON 

LTN 

rt 

UN 

C^- 

ON 

US 

VO 

C\J 

I 

CM 

I 

i 

o 

3 

I 

00 

1 

1 

1      O       1 

i 

\o 

CM 

1 

CM 

1 

r-  i 

t 

CM 

.-* 

CO 

un 

CM 

CM 

NN 

CO 

'■O 

t^ 

NO 

CO 

ITS 

KN 

CM 

r- 

CM 

ON 

rt 

KN 

o 

CM 

o 

o 

ON 

CM     O 

o 

CM 

o 

rt 

ON 

O 

UN 

rH 

MD 

VO 

o 

ON 

CM 

ON 

o 

I 

'.— 

NO 

1 

KN 

, 

i 

1 

rH 

, 

1 

1     CO    jt 

i 

r-l 

CM 

r} 

rt 

O 

1 

rt 

t>- 

CM 

O 

vo 

VO 

CO 

UN 

CO 

o 

t-— 

t— 

ON 

rH     t^- 

C— 

UN 

<o 

CO 

c— 

[^ 

ON 

CM 

CM 

rt 

CM    d" 

«D 

f- 

IT\ 

O 

VO 

C^ 

UN 

vo 

ON 

f- 

KN 

CO 

UN 

KN 

NO 

\o 

CM 

NO 

O 

CM 

rt 

KN 

UN 

ON 

CM     O 

NO 

O 

KN 

=t 

UN 

ON 

O 

CM 

rt 

M  . 

o> 

f— 

CO 

C- 

ON 

rH     (M 

o 

rt 

KN 

rH 

rH 

OO 

rH 

CM 

CO 

: 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CM 

o* 

CM 

1 

in 

CM 

i 

1 

■tt- 

o> 

1 

r«N 
WO 

1 

1      UN    •-« 
CM 

UN 
O 

i 

cO 

c 

O 

rH 

UN 
CM 

rt 

cO 
•H 

c 

cO 

CO 

1 

UN 
UN 

00 

00 
ON 

ON 
CO 

C 
O 

NO 

o 

CM 

CO 
•H 
C 

to 

CM 
NO 

1 

CO 

CO 

-p 

a 

NO 

H 

rt 

0 

to 

O 

10 

5 

T3 

c 

-H              -H 

CO 

rt 

> 

CD 

CO 

Jp 

u 

■p 

rH 

nJ 

CI) 

■o 

CO 

■H 

CO 

s 

Ct 

f^      CO     X 

O 

B 

VI 

•H 

9 

•H 

9 

to 

CO 

^ 

E 

CO 

to 

rd 

■H 

o 

c 

o 

4J 

JJ 

cO 

tn 

2      C      <l> 

o 

c 

>> 

W 

c 

> 

4-i 

O 

cO 

^J 

c 

Pi 

M 

C 

CO 

rt 

3 

W 

10 

•H 

O      CO    E 

£ 

SI 

o 

V) 

CO 

to 

■H 

•H 

■H 

u 

O 

jcj 

(0 

rt 

o 

Eh 

•H 

CO 

■p 

0) 

CO 

>i 

x: 

W     -P 

+s 

O 

cO 

bl 

C 

cO 

-C 

til 

£ 

4-> 

E 

CO 

Eh 

+J 

cO 

rt 

rrf 

o 

n 

5 

c 

c 

s 

w 

Fh 

w     C    3 

u 

-H 

01 

c 

X 

CO 

L 

CO 

CO 

O 

SI 

C 

rH 

b 

o 

<u 

rH 

a 

o 

rt 

Ct) 

CO 

•H 

•H      O      CO 

O 

£ 

>: 

Fh 

a 

CO 

0) 

4-> 

■H 

CO 

CO 

>> 

-p 

01 

< 

< 

3 

o 

o 

H 

M 

H 

Srf 

fcrf 

^ 

E 

E    E    2 

)Z 

o 

o 

O 

Ph 

Eh 

E-< 

P 

> 

s 

3 

3 

o 

CO     rH      C     3     to 


-  3  - 


m  CO  ON  o 

O     r<N  l*N  t^- 

ia  a-  o  4 

•-<«-*  on  o 

■*  Er  ■=*■ 


o   o   r-  o 


o   o  mo  o 


i     i     i     i 


KN     ON 

on  tr- 

MO       LTv 


^)    S    S    o 


O      "-"    CO  *-*     CM    VO 

ur\  co    as      m   o    i-i 

IA     41     ^  O      ON     H 


,  3 


i    i    i    i 


O       H 

^T)    00 


o    .-I    t-- 

f-  j-   CO 

^H    on 


.-H  ^o    (M 


cfl     ai     aj    Q 


ffl^ict,        3«W£ 


M       rf     t< 


O   CO    o    o 

o   o    o 

CO 

O 

UN 

o 

■-H       i-H      O     MO 

h    in  in 

ON 

O 

KN 

o 

O     to     ON 

f-t    un 

o- 

O 

kn 

o 

-H      J- 

cm   m 

o 

CM 

1         1         1         1 
1         1         ■         1 

1         1         1         1 

I      r      i      i 

CM 

1          1          1 

1          1          1 

1          1          1 
1          1          1 

UN 
1 

1 

i 

o 

CO 

UN 

c— 
r— 

i 

ON 
KN 

CM 
t- 

cd 
o 

ON 

r- 

=*■ 

MO 
CO 

UN 

MO 

o 

CO 

t— 
UN 

kn 

r-N 

r-N 

o 

CM 

o 

MO 

MO 

CM 

r*N 

tA 

1     CO       1        1 

1          1          I 

CO 

CM 

C\J 

CM 

ON 

un 

UN 

ON 

MO 

CO 

i    un     i      i 

1          1          1 

UN 

O 

KN 

CM 

J- 

J" 

i      i      i      i 

1          1          1 

' 

1 

O 

-3" 
^t 

O 

J- 

J" 

o 

ON 

UN 

o   o 

O 

MO 

C— 

CM 

O    MO 

MO 

o 

ON 

o> 

I          1       ON 

1          1          1 

ON 

ON 
ON 

CM 
O 
KN 

o 

o   o   o 

O 

UN 

KN 

VD 

^ 

h    in   in 

CM 

MO 

O 

O        |         |         | 

«-<     KN 

LfN 

ON 

MO 

1 

CM     KN 

\o 

O 

CM 

CM 

Zt 

O 

CM 

CO 

cO 

rt 

4J 

rt 

•H 

.p 

O 

P 

o 

C          c 

o 

J-J 

■ 

aJ             O 

.p 

4-> 

W      O     «H 

>     a)    -P 

t-\ 

T3 

ca   -d    x 

r-i     -ri      bQ 

CO 

<M 

C 

'.  | 

nJ      to      CO      <L> 

■P 

o 

CO 

0 

^     C     fn    E 

W     *H     *H 

O 

h 

w     rt     o 
n3    i2    M     3 

c    bo  x: 

En 

.p 

o 

' ) 

C     Fh    w 

c 

a 

r-\      t*      O      IU 

0)     *H      nJ 

a 

QJ 

<     <     O     2 

P4    >    s 

Eh 

at 

Pm 

Oh 

tn      0)     -H     ti     CO 


CO      QJ      CO     -P 
-P      CO      U     -O"      O 


O      (0  H       U 

£h    o    <m    <-i    <u 

3     O       O     M     CO 


-  u  - 


t 


Extent  of   coal-bearing  sequence     ' 

Area  where  No. 6    Coal  is  IOOO  ft 
or  more  in  depth 

v      Underground    mine 

•      Strip  mine 

0  20  40     miles 


J     UNION 

,'"■£  V"  '--~-f  MASSAC'S 

--    <^_  APULiSKi        I  \      \ 

\%   /     ^  !/ 


Fig.  1  -  Operating  coal  mines  as  of  October  1973.   (Source:   Illinois  Department  of 
Mines  and  Minerals.) 


-  5  - 

The  latest  estimate  of  reserves  of  coal  in  the  ground  is  1^8,172, 5^0  ,000 
tons  (table  2).   Included  are  coals  more  than  28  inches  thick  if  they  are  more 
than  150  feet  deep,  and  more  than  18  inches  thick  if  they  are  less  than  150 
feet  deep.   Thinner  coals  are  not  included  in  the  reserves.   This  estimate  is 
based  on  data  developed  in  Cady's  1952  study  and  on  additional  information  de- 
rived from  exploratory  drilling  conducted  in  recent  years.   It  makes  no  deduc- 
tion for  coal  mined  since  the  later  reports  were  published.   The  new  informa- 
tion has  significantly  increased  the  estimated  reserves — more  coal  has  been 
added  to  the  reserves  than  has  been  removed  by  coal  mining  since  1952,  at  which 
time  reserves  were  estimated  (Cady,  1952)  at  more  than  137  billion  tons. 

In  Illinois,  about  lU  percent  of  our  total  coal  reserves  is  found  in 
seams  lying  less  than  150  feet  deep  (table  2) ,  and  much  of  that  coal  is  econom- 
ically strippable  with  present  equipment.   The  remaining  coal  reserves  that 
have  been  mapped  lie  between  150  and  1500  feet  deep,  the  deeper  reserves  occur- 
ring in  the  deepest  part  of  the  Illinois  Basin  in  Cumberland,  Jasper,  Richland, 
Clay,  and  Wayne  Counties  (fig.  l). 

Changing  technology  and  economic  conditions  determine  how  thick  a 
coal  must  be  to  be  considered  commercially  minable  at  any  given  time,  and  these 
factors  vary  in  different  parts  of  the  state  at  any  one  time.   For  example,  al- 
though relatively  little  coal  as  thin  as  18  inches  has  been  mined  in  Illinois, 
one  major  strip  mine  in  the  state  is  now  mining  coal  that  will  average  only 
slightly  more  than  18  inches.   Furthermore,  although  it  is  technologically  pos- 
sible, very  little  strip  mining  in  the  state  has  yet  removed  more  than  100  feet 
of  overburden,  but  what  thickness  of  overburden  will  ultimately  be  practical  to 
mine  in  Illinois  has  not  yet  been  clearly  defined.   Although  some  coal  no  more 
than  30  inches  thick  has  been  mined  underground,  such  operations  have  generally 
been  very  small.   In  years  past,  sizable  underground  operations  have  mined 
coal  3  to  h   feet  thick,  but  the  coal  mined  in  present  large-scale  operations 
is  generally  thicker. 

An  important  aspect  of  Illinois  coal  reserves  data  compiled  by  the 
Illinois  Geological  Survey  is  the  detail  in  which  they  are  given.   Thicknesses 
recorded  for  each  county  are  now  making  it  possible  to  estimate  current  reserves 
of  given  minimum  thicknesses  above  the  l8-inch  and  28-inch  minima  we  mentioned 
previously.   On  a  statewide  basis,  for  example,  if  5*+  inches  were  the  minimum 
thickness  specified,  total  in-ground  reserves  would  be  reduced  by  50  percent, 
because  only  50  percent  of  all  Illinois  coal  reserves  are  estimated  to  be  5^ 
inches  or  more  thick. 

For  many  years  various  agencies  estimating  reserves  have  assumed  that 
50  percent  of  the  coal  is  lost  or  rendered  unminable  in  underground  mining.  Al- 
though individual  mines  now  generally  exceed  50  percent  recovery,  the  estimate 
is  still  valid  when  counties  or  larger  areas  are  considered,  for  in  Illinois 
only  oil  pool  areas  heavily  drilled  for  oil  and  gas  have  been  excluded  from 
reserves  estimates.   Many  surface  features  (cities,  towns,  superhighways,  and 
similar  areas)  will  also  render  coal  unavailable  for  underground  mining.   There 
are,  of  course,  several  other  factors  that  must  be  considered  in  determining 
minability  of  coal,  including  mining  conditions  and  a  variety  of  economic  factors. 

Technology  designed  to  increase  recoverability,  with  due  regard  to 
minimizing  environmental  damage,  should  be  encouraged.  The  coal  left  in  the 
ground  in  mined  areas  constitutes  a  loss  of  an  important  source  of  energy. 


-  6  - 


MD     CM     m 

CD     IA    ■"* 


On    t~-   d"  CM  f~ 

4-    o\  m  cm  r- 

<J\   f-~  C—  ON  o 

cm    o    t—  f-  no 

CM     C*\  ON  m 

>-<     W  IA  l^\ 


ao         h   in      h 

Cvj  ^-i    NO  CM 

CO  •**     0J  (^ 


ON    O 
E*-    CM 


U"\  O 
O  CM 
NO     KN 


.-I       .-H  .-I       pOj      O        f— 

O     O         O     t^  MD    J- 
CO  CO 


NO     ON    ON 
O    00     ^ 


CO 

< 
o 
o 


h   h  vo  \o   m  o  4  j  t^  o 

^    CO     ON    OJ     H  ON  CO  .3-    m    KN 

cMm^tf^o  co  co  e—  m  »-« 

,vo  ^   in  m  r-  -^  ©  on  on 
m  co   on 

M3     f-   m    (M 


•"<    CO     On    ff\    ON        f-«     •-*     •-!     i-i     t— 

comOON<-<      o  no  co    r^  '-'      o\  on'_ 

NO     —<    m  CO    NO         ON    H   CO    "^    ^         H    j    CO     C^    CA 


oo   no   in  in  m 

co    in  m   NN    " 
E—   m  jt    m 


<-*      t-  on  r-  t- 


o  in 

NO  CO 
no  CO 


*h      M3    on  in  in  no 

K\         CNJ     CM    CO     O    CO 

CM         r-i    J-     CJ\    t-  CO 


co  co   m  h  no 
m  on  m   rn  ■=£ 


NO      O 


it     h   CO  [-   c— 

on  md    m  cm    o 

t—  oo  no  m  in 

CM    NO     O  0\    ro» 

*-*     ?—    CM  t—    CM 

>-    CM     m  CM     '-' 


CO  CO     ON    H     O 

in  KN    CM     O    MO 

o\  J"     ON  VO    NO 

ON  ON    O     ON    ON 

no  in  in  co  oo 

E--  i-«   on  on  in 

•~*  CM     CM     CM     CM 


N     ON    J 

in  «-•  co 
oo    in  in 


o 
o 

pq 

CO 
H 

o 

s 

H 
H 


S     CQ 

H   T) 

C 

CQ    aj 

K    O 

CQ  Eh 
W  — 
K 

$ 
O 

o 

o 


h   w  *o   on  m 
j-    ON  on  co    h 

CM    O    J-     f-    O 


a     sa 


NO     -h     CM 

KN    «-»     O 

m  in  t^ 


cm    J-    on  ^    m 
in  ^t    cm   r—  c^ 


ON    CM 

co    in 

t-  o 


in  oo 


OMJ\    h        CO    NO    NO     O     ON        ^HOin^^O         .-<    co     c*- 

it^-NONOfH      h   ^  vo   ia^      m  co   ^ 
mo^hojm3       o    n   ia  m  no       on  h  j 


.-h   .-<   f-i    -h   on      c—  int— 

■"■  j-   m  ^o   m      c^  co   ■-< 

j-     o     t-H     »-h         ON    C*-    rn 


Zj"     CM     ITN 


m  6$ 

no    m 


NO         NO     CM 


0J 

PQ 
Eh 


00  -    zj-     -• 


ONmMOCMr'N        «-•    00    O     jt 

n  no    h    t^  m      m   h    n    r- 

OOmf*"\OON         CM     CM    CO     CJ 


NO  '-t     CM 


_    CD     CM 

r-  no  no 


i^  in  H   t^ 


H      H  ^VO 

in  no  ^h    in 

in  no  t^   CM 

NO      rH  CO      h 

m  no  jt   t— 

CM    00  CO 


no    in  co    on 

NO     CO     ON   NO 

o    o  no   m 

h  c-nd    m 
in   h  co    cm 

CM     CvJ     H     H 


CO  CM 
CM  ON 
ON   J- 


.3-   J-  ir\ 
co    in  in 

CO     it   N£) 


m    cm    c^  t 

CM     CO     CM     CM 

in   r—  Jt  no 
cm    on  m   CM 

CO     (M     H 

4-    OJ    m 


X)      3      CO     Si 


<    ffl     CQ     W    U 


Fh     >j         £    -CD      3     £>     S 


w     rt     Eh     rt     cfl        -Hf-tnj 

co    r    £    H 


o    o    o   o   o 


Eh      Eh      G     P  ^iOrtC'O 


3      «     3     ^      ?i 

o    -o    *o    Q-t    rt 


C     -P     M      CU 


OQ  Q     U     Id      Id     [i.  faPnOOO 


X    X    X    X 


O  Eh  Eh  >>  ,* 

iii  u)  cj  hi  id 

^  a.  v.  w  X 

O  W  <i-H  Eh  C 

aj  nj  <u  cu  rt 

i-a  "-a  »-3  ^>  t*i 


a)     cu     C     C 
X    co     Eh    -H     rt 


n    co    gj  «h    o 

W       v4       J       ,_H       ^ 


-  7  - 


rH       0\  VO 


rH  J-     MD 


NO  rt 

CM  O 


00  *-*        -* 


-H  CT\ 


CM     O     r<-\    O    NO 

C\J  ON    O     (\J     h    VO 

O  rH       O      rH      .^-       |*N 


j-    on  on  •-«    un 

J-     O    NO     ON    O 
UN  ^     UN    ON    O 


UN    CM     ON    UN   CO  ONNOj-LfNO 

J-J-J-'-'  •-«     CM    CO     CM     UN 

CM     UN    -3"  f—    0J  UN     <-» 


st    kn  m  co 
cm    r—  no    UN 

ON    J-    NO     ON 


f*N  O 
C\J  CM 
MO    CO 


UN    r<N         •-* 


«-i  ON 


CM    NO    MD     [■—    CM         OknOOO 
Of—    On   OJ    f-        O     t"^    UN    O     C*— 


O    CO    J 

O     ON  CO 
•-*  ON 


fT\ON       .-<    ND     .-t    O     f—       y)     lACO    j-     w 


.-h  ON  l"*-  «-* 

NO  NO  ^O  ufN  l*N     C—     f— 

.-.  .-.  NO  O  CM     —I    CO 

CM  VO  ON  CM  VO 


O    VO     UN    CM 

in  on  i^  h 


J-         J-     O    J-     iA    w 
-•  KN     i-t     J-     J-     O 


rf\  r^  h  (\j  + 
r*N  i"N  P—  •-*  O 
UN    *-•    NO    t—  J- 


CO    NO 

f—  CO 

•-*   o 


J-  On  0\  h  r^ 
J-  ^  J-  ON  UN 
UN   NO    VO      ON    f- 


r—    CM     C—    UN   -d- 


UNUNI*N«-HNO  r*N     m     .-I     O 

■ZJ-      ■-<     CM     CM     ON         O      CM     vO    CO 
CM     ON    CM     Jd"     O  m^O     ON    H 


ON  4-  ON  (A  ^ 
1A  H  O  H  (\J 
J-     VO     ^      H     \fl 


J"      0J     O     t— 


UN 
UN 

ON 
UN 
CO 

J- 

3 

UN 
UN 

m 

CvJ 

C— 

CO 
UN 
UN 

CVJ 
CM 
KN 

t—   O       MD    r<N 


ON  -h 
O  i-^ 
ON    UN 


UN  .-I     UN 


O     W     H  CO 


J-  CO 
0J  ON 
KN   MD 


UN   J"    CO 

NO     ON    i-h 
UN  NO    NO 


r-H  O     O 


2      3 


J±  ON  CO  --• 
r<N  O  ON  O 
UN  CO     UN    m 


CO       ^O     ON 
ON        (\l      h- 


1*^       CO     ON 


NO 
NO 

o 

<M 

UN 
M3 

J- 

CM 
UN 

CM 
f*N 

fn 

kn 

J- 

CM 

\o 

UN 
UN 

O 

c- 
o 

o   r-  t—  c— 
cm  f-  o  co 

•-I     UN     UN   NO 


2      3 


NO      r-,     J- 

KN   MD     ON 

m  ro   H 


NO     KN     CM     ON 


NO  CM 

KN  CO 


£      Ph      (U  ObOcfl-P-H 


J      T)         fn      Eh      W      C      b 

on)       nJ     rt     cu     <u     <u 
E    S      £    E    E    E    E 


£    £    £    £    Pl. 


aJ    M    r-i     <D 


<U     C     TJ        £     ^ 


fc     cfl    .*    -P     C 

Cm      Cm      U.      U,      ir; 


t»  +*  O  ^  3 

3  -P  .H  Jh  CD 

.C  o  a;  rfl  n 

o  o  si  -p  a) 

CO  CO  CO  CO  H 


EctJfn.CC:  -P     rH      r-t      *d 

fn      O       fn       W       >i  -HrHrHO 

aiajctjnjctj       xi^h-ho 


-  8  - 

In  evaluating  coal  reserves  of  any  area,  how  the  reserves  are  de- 
fined is  of  major  importance.  In  Illinois ,  for  example,  if  a  minimum  thick- 
ness of  5*+  inches  for  all  types  of  mining  (about  50  percent  of  total  reserves 
mapped  to  date)  and  the  figure  of  50  percent  recovery  were  accepted,  only 
about  25  percent  of  the  nearly  1^8  billion  tons  of  coal  would  be  estimated  as 
recoverable. 

Whatever  assumptions  may  be  made  for  estimating  recoverable  coal 
reserves,  Illinois  compares  very  favorably  with  all  other  states  having  bi- 
tuminous coal  reserves  because  of  its  generally  thicker,  more  continuous, 
and  relatively  flat-lying  seams . 


Ac  knowl edgme  nt  s 

Much  of  the  statistical  data  used  in  the  preparation  of  this  report 
was  gathered  from  the  Illinois  State  Department  of  Mines  and  Minerals  Annual 
Coal  Reports  and  from  the  Minerals  Yearbooks  of  the  U.S.  Bureau  of  Mines.   A 
more  detailed  report  covering  much  of  the  same  subject  material  was  submitted 
in  February  1970  by  Jack  A.  Simon  as  testimony  before  the  Illinois  Commerce 
Commission.   The  present  report  brings  the  data  of  this  earlier  report  up  to 
date  and  discusses  the  relation  of  coal  in  Illinois  to  current  problems,  par- 
ticularly those  related  to  the  current  energy  shortage. 


COAL  QUALITY 


Rank 

Illinois  coals  are  all  of  high-volatile  bituminous  rank.   The  rank 
for  each  coal  increases  from  northwest  to  southeast ,  ranging  from  high-volatile 
C  (the  lowest  rank  of  bituminous  coal)  in  northwestern  Illinois,  through  high- 
volatile  B  in  the  central  and  southern  parts  of  the  state,  to  high-volatile  A 
in  extreme  southeastern  Illinois  (Cady,  1935;  Bamberger,  1971).   Natural  mois- 
ture contents  range  from  about  20  percent  in  the  northwest  to  about  5  percent 
in  the  southeast.   Heating  value  (on  an  as-received  basis)  of  Illinois  coal 
ranges  from  about  10,500  to  more  than  13,000  Btu  per  pound,  with  the  older 
coals  of  any  area  generally  having  higher  heating  values  than  younger  coals. 
No  systematic  variation  in  ash  content  has  been  discerned.   Most  coals  that 
are  being  or  have  been  mined  are  reported  to  contain  between  5  and  15  percent 
ash  (as-received  basis),  with  an  average  of  about  11  percent. 


Sulfur  Content 

The  sulfur  content  of  coal  has  recently  assumed  great  importance  as 
regulations  concerning  air  quality  have  limited  the  use  of  high-sulfur  coals. 
Sulfur  occurs  in  coal  in  three  forms:  organic  sulfur,   which  occurs  in  the  or- 
ganic compounds  in  the  coal;  pyritic  sulfur,   which  is  found  as  iron  sulfides 
(FeS2)  that  may  be  finely  disseminated  in  the  coal  in  microscopic  grains,  or 


-  9  - 

found  in  nodules,  in  lenses,  in  bands,  and  perhaps  on  cleat  (fracture)  faces; 
and  sulfate  sulfur,   which  normally  occurs  in  relatively  minor  amounts  in  fresh 
coal. 

Total  sulfur  in  Illinois  coals  has  been  reported  to  vary  between  0.5 
and  6.0  percent  (dry  basis),  with  occasional  samples  having  a  higher  sulfur 
content.   The  average  total  sulfur  content  of  ^73  face-channel  samples  from 
Illinois  mines  reported  by  Gluskoter  and  Simon  (1968)  was  3. 57  percent.   They 
also  reported  an  average  of  1%  times  as  much  pyritic  sulfur  as  organic  sulfur 
in  the  same  coals.   Face-channel  samples,  excluding  mineral  bands  over  three- 
eighths  of  an  inch  thick,  are  believed  to  approximate  the  coal  seam  after  mod- 
erate preparation. 


Coals  in  certain  well  defined  areas  of  Illinois  have  a  significantly 
lower  sulfur  content  than  coals  in  the  rest  of  the  state,  a  condition  than  can 
be  related  geologically  to  variations  in  the  roof  strata  immediately  overlying 
the  coal.  Most  of  the  relatively  high-sulfur  coals  (those  with  3  to  5  percent 
sulfur  on  a  dry  basis)  are  overlain  by  either  black  shale,  limestone,  or  fos- 
siliferous  shale,  all  of  which  have  at  least  one  thing  in  common — they  contain 
animal  fossils  that  indicate  they  were  deposited  in  marine  waters.   Conversely, 
every  important  known  occurrence  of  Illinois  coal  that  has  a  significantly  low 
sulfur  level  is  overlain  by  nonmarine  gray  shale  in  which  plant  fossils  predom- 
inate.  The  gray  shale  separates  the  coal  from  the  overlying  marine  unit,  usu- 
ally black  shale  or  limestone.   A  fairly  sharp  change  in  sulfur  content  nor- 
mally occurs  between  areas  with  marine  roof  and  those  with  nonmarine  roof.  When 
the  gray  shale  exceeds  20  feet  thick,  the  total  sulfur  content  of  the  coal  is 
normally  less  than  2.5  percent  and  commonly  averages  about  1.5  percent.   The 

nonmarine  shale  is  usually  associated 
with  a  river-laid  sandstone  unit  that 
replaces  the  coal  in  a  long,  sinuous 
band,  or  "sandstone  channel." 

Areas  of  low-sulfur  coal  have  been 
mapped  (Gluskoter  and  Simon,  1968;  Hop- 
kins, 1968)  and  are  shown  in  figure  2. 
Total  reserves  (i.e.,  total  in  ground) 
in  these  areas  for  the  Herrin  (No.  6) 
Coal  and  the  Harrisburg  (No.  5)  Coal 
Members  amount  to  U.8  billion  tons,  or 
3.2  percent  of  the  total  reserves  of 
the  state  (table  3).  About  65  percent 
of  the  coal  in  the  so-called  "Quality 
Circle"  low-sulfur  area,  principally 
parts  of  Williamson,  Franklin,  and  Jef- 
ferson Counties,  has  been  mined  out, 
and  the  remainder  is  under  development 
by  five  large  underground  mines.  Most 
of  the  production  goes  to  the  metallur- 
gical coke  market.  Other  areas  of  low- 
sulfur  Herrin  Coal  are  the  "Troy  Area," 
lying  principally  in  Madison  and  St. 
Clair  Counties,  and  the  "Hornsby  Area" 
in  east-central  Macoupin  County.    In 


Sulfur    content 

Harrisburg    (No  5) 
Cool  Member- 
estimoted    I  to  3%, 
ov    2.0% 

Cool   missing  or  split 


POPE*         T  HARDIN    *\ 


( 


1    SvVv 


-.S  MASSAC  \ 


Pig.  2  -  Low- sulfur  coal  areas  in  Illinois 
that  have  been  mapped. 


-  10  - 

TABLE  3— ILLINOIS  LOW-SULFUR  RESERVES  IN  GROUND 


Coal 

County 

Millions   of  tons 

Herrin   (No.    6) 

Clinton 

23 

(<  2.5#  S, 

Franklin 

3  07 

av.    1.5#, 

Jackson 

37 

dry  basis ) 

Jefferson 

580 

Macoupin 

396 

Madison 

21+5 

Perry 

35 

St.   Clair 

381 

Williamson 

59 

Total 

2,063 

Harrisburg 

Edwards 

5^ 

(No.    5) 

Franklin 

2i+3 

(<  2.5#  S, 

Hamilton 

563 

av.  a.    2$, 

Saline 

627 

dry  basis ) 

Wabash 

262 

Wayne 

89 

White 

626 

Williamson 

27^ 

Total 

2,738 

Total   Illinois 

low-sulfur  reserves             4,801* 

*  3.23  percent  of  total  coal  reserves  of  Illinois. 

these  three  areas  slightly  more  than  2  billion  tons  of  coal  in  the  ground  con- 
tains an  estimated  average  of  1.5  percent  total  sulfur.   The  Troy  and  Hornsby 
areas  are  not  being  mined  at  present ,  although  the  Troy  area  has  been  mined  in 
the  past . 

Less  is  known  about  the  average  sulfur  content  of  the  low-sulfur 
Harrisburg  (No.  5)  Coal,  but  it  is  thought  that  the  belt  extending  from  Mt.Car- 
mel  in  Wabash  County  to  Harrisburg  in  Saline  County  contains  about  2.7  billion 
tons  of  coal  with  an  average  sulfur  content  of  about  2.0  percent;  some  of  the 
coal  contains  as  little  as  1.0  percent  sulfur.  This  low-sulfur  coal  area  has 
been  mined  only  in  Saline  County,  where  it  has  been  extensively  worked.   A  new 
mine  has  just  begun  production  in  this  low-sulfur  coal  in  Wabash  County. 

Low-sulfur  coals  occur  in  other  less  well  known  areas  in  Illinois, 
but  their  extent  is  either  relatively  small  or  not  enough  data  are  available 
to  permit  their  delineation.   However,  no  additional  large  occurrences  of  min- 
able  low-sulfur  coals  are  likely  to  be  found,  particularly  in  the  better  known 
minable  seams  ,  because  the  relatively  abundant  subsurface  data  reveal  no  ex- 
tensive areas  of  coal  under  nonmarine  gray  shale,  the  geologic  indicator  of 
low-sulfur  coal. 

The  1970  production  of  coal  in  Illinois  is  shown  in  table  U,  accord- 
ing to  sulfur  content.   Nearly  27  percent  of  the  coal  contained  less  than  2.5 
percent  sulfur,  whereas  more  than  73  percent  of  the  coal  exceeded  2.5  percent 
sulfur. 


-  11  - 

IMPORTANCE  OF  COAL  TO  ILLINOIS 

Coal  is  by  far  the  largest  mineral  resource  in  Illinois  and  it  has 
the  highest  annual  mineral  production  value.  With  the  present  energy  short- 
age facing  this  country,  judicious  use  of  this  important  commodity,  with  due 
regard  for  environmental  quality,  is  vital. 

Coal  production  (fig.  3)  in  Illinois  in  1972,  from  59  mines  in  22 
counties,  totaled  65,521,394  tons  and  was  about  equally  divided  between  sur- 
face and  strip  mines.   This  was  the  largest  production  since  1948,  following 
which  year  production  declined  to  a  low  point  in  1954.   Since  196l ,  the  trend 
of  the  state's  coal  production  has  been  generally  upward,  although  some  fluc- 
tuation has  occurred  in  recent  years. 

The  1972  coal  production  had  a  value  of  more  than  402  million  dol- 
lars (at  $6.14  per  ton)  and  constituted  almost  50  percent  of  all  Illinois  min- 
eral production  (fig.  4) .   Petroleum,  the  second  most  valuable  mineral  resource 
in  Illinois,  had  a  value  of  more  than  121  million  dollars  in  1972  (figured  at 
$3.1+7  per  barrel),  or  14.9  percent  of  the  state's  total  mineral  production  value, 

The  value  of  a  basic  raw  material  to  the  economy  is  only  partially 
expressed  by  its  actual  value.   Basic  raw  materials  generate  or  support  other 
industries  that  convert  the  raw  material  to  consumable  products.   Also  involved 
are  the  various  industries  that  provide  materials  and  services  to  the  basic  in- 
dustry and  to  the  people  employed.   Coal,  for  instance,  is  by  far  the  most  im- 
portant single  commodity  carried  by  our  railroads,  both  in  tonnage  and  in  reve- 
nue. 


PRODUCTIVITY  AND  EMPLOYMENT 

Illinois  mines,  among  the  most  productive  in  the  world,  are  large 
and  highly  mechanized.   Illinois  mines  (both  strip  and  underground)  have 


TABLE  4— ILLINOIS  COAL  PRODUCTION  BY  SULFUR  RANGE 
AND  CUMULATIVE  TOTALS  AT  EACH  RANGE* 


Sulfur 

Cumulative 

content 

Cumulative 

Total   tons 

%  of 

if) 

Tons 

tons 

(*) 

total   tons 

1.0  -  1.49 

8,823,114 

8,823,114 

13.8 

13.8 

1.5    -    1.99 

3,997,656 

12,820,770 

6.3 

20.  1 

2.0  -    2.4-9 

4,162,803 

16,983,573 

6.5 

26.6 

2.5   -   2.99 

14,508,072 

31,491,645 

22.8 

49.4 

3.0  -   3.^9 

17,610,333 

49,101,978 

27.6 

77-0 

3.5    -   3.99 

8,751,686 

57,853,664 

13.7 

90.7 

4. 0  and  over 

5,936,555 

63,790,219 

9-3 

100.0 

*Source:   Midwest  Coal  Producers  Institute  ( I97O) 


-  12  - 


100 


75 


ILLINOIS 


—i — i — i 1 — i — i 1 — i — i 1 — i — i 1 — i — i 1 — i — r- 

1948  1952  1956  I960  1964  1968  1972 


Percentage    of  production   by  stripping 


Underground  and  strip  production  from    Illinois  coal   mines 


Pig.   3   -  Illinois  maintains   a  good  balance  between  strip  and  underground  mining.      In 
the   nation  as  a  whole,   strip  mining  has   steadily   increased. 


-  13  - 


900 


800- 


1948  1952  1956  I960  1964  1968 

Value  of  mineral  production  in  Illinois 


100 


c 
a> 
o 

i_ 

9> 

0_ 


50- 


25- 


1948 


972 


NON-FUEL  MINERALS 


PETROLEUM   AND 
PRODUCTS 


1952 


1956 


COAL 


I960 


1964 


1968 


1972 


Percentage  of  mineral  value  accounted  for  by 
various  commodity  groups  in  Illinois 

Fig.  4-  -  Coal  is  the  most  important  mineral  commodity  produced  in  Illinois.   (Source: 
U.  S.  Bureau  of  Mines  Minerals  Yearbooks.) 


-  Ik  - 


35 



c 
2   30 

/^ 

o 
t=>    25 

yS 

a> 
pi 

STRIP    MINES                           / 

20 

c 
o 

E 

: 

■~^^^                                                            ^ 

Yield    per 

ALL    MINES                           ^^~^\^^^                                     X. 

5 

■■ — •    r 

UNDERGROUND    MINES 

■      i      i      i      i      i      i      i      i      i      i      i      i      i      i      i      i      i      i      i      i      i      i 

1948  1952  1956  I960  1964  1968 

Trends    in   labor   productivity   in   United    States    coal  mines 


1972 


UNDERGROUND   MINES 


_l ■  ' L. 


1948  1952  1956  I960  1964  1968 

Trends  in  labor  productivity  in  Illinois    coal  mines 


1972 


Fig.  5  -  Illinois  has  consistently  led  the  United  States  as  a  whole  in  productivity 
per  man  in  both  strip  and  underground  mining.   (Source:   U.S.  Bureau  of 
Mines  Minerals  Yearbooks.) 


-  15  - 

consistently  been  ahead  of  the  national  average  in  productivity  per  man  (fig. 
5).   Only  during  1971  and  1972  has  the  national  average  for  strip  mine  labor 
productivity  exceeded  that  in  Illinois.   The  decline  is  probably  related  to 
such  factors  as  the  enactment  in  1967  of  a  new  reclamation  law  and  to  the  in- 
creasing depth  of  overburden  in  Illinois  mines.   Illinois  strip  mine  produc- 
tivity per  man-day  declined  in  1968  but  rose  again  in  1971. 

The  over-all  reduction  in  productivity  per  man  in  Illinois  and  through- 
out the  country  has  two  causes,  both  of  which  arose  at  about  the  same  time. 
First,  the  increasing  awareness  of  the  need  for  protection  of  the  environment 
diverted  manpower  from  mining  to  activities  such  as  strip  mine  reclamation, 
acid-water  treatment  or  containment  facilities,  and  the  prevention  of  contin- 
ued exposure  of  refuse  material  to  the  environment,  adversely  affecting  pro- 
ductivity.  Second,  the  Health  and  Safety  Act  of  1969  affected  production  in 
underground  mines.   A  steady  increase  in  productivity  for  many  years  had  cul- 
minated in  the  highest  productivity  reported  for  the  country  as  a  whole,  15.6l 
tons  per  man  per  day  in  1969.   The  rate  dropped  nationally  to  12.03  in  1971 
and  is  expected  to  be  below  12  for  1972.   In  Illinois,  productivity  of  under- 
ground mines  has  dropped  from  almost  23  tons  per  man-day  in  1969  to  slightly 
less  than  19  in  1971,  although  Illinois  underground  mines  still  have  the  high- 
est productivity  per  man-day  of  all  the  coal-producing  states.   Strip  mine 
productivity  has  more  or  less  leveled  off  for  the  nation  as  a  whole,  but -has 
dropped  considerably  for  Illinois. 

Illinois  mines  are  large  producers,  averaging  over  1.1  million  tons 
per  mine  for  the  year  1972  (fig.  6).   The  average  mine  size  (measured  in  out- 
put) has  increased  rapidly  in  Illinois,  especially  since  1958,  and  the  number 
of  mines  has  consequently  declined  markedly  from  350  mines  in  1950  to  the  pres- 
ent kQ.      The  national  average  has  increased  only  slightly.   In  1971  there  were 
some  5,1^9  coal  mines  in  the  country — only  6U  of  them  in  Illinois.   These  6k 
mines,  constituting  only  1.2  percent  of  the  total  number  of  mines  in  the  United 
States,  accounted  for  10.6  percent  of  the  total  production,  attesting  to  the 
efficiency  of  this  industry  in  Illinois. 

In  1972  the  total  number  of  men  directly  employed  in  the  coal  mining 
industry  in  Illinois  was  11,237.   Of  these,  7,870  were  employed  by  underground 
mines  and  3,367  by  strip  mines.   Mining  activities  employ  men  in  22  counties; 
distribution  of  the  11,237  employees  by  county  is  shown  in  figure  7.  Three  con- 
centrations of  mining  occur — in  western  Illinois  where  operation  is  principally 
by  surface  methods,  in  west-central  Illinois  where  three  very  large  underground 
mines  are  located,  and  in  southern  and  southwestern  Illinois,  the  largest  area, 
where  both  underground  and  strip  mining  methods  are  employed. 


USES  OF  ILLINOIS  COAL 

Most  projections  for  the  future  use  of  energy  in  the  United  States 
point  to  a  substantial  increase  in  the  need  for  coal,   for  the  generation  of 
electrical  power  now  and  conversion  to  gas  or  liquid  fuels  later.   Table  5  is 
one  such  projection  (Dupree  and  West,  1972),  and  many  of  the  others  are  simi- 
lar (Risser,  i960).   This  projection  forecasts  a  need  for  almost  one  billion 


-  16  - 


350 


100- 


1948 


UNITED   STATES 


1       '1952'       ' 


1  I9561       ' 


I960  1964 

Trends  in  overage  output  for  the  coal  industry 
in  Illinois  and  the  United  States 


1 1  I 1 r 

1968  1972 


Fig.  6  -  Because  many  of  the  smaller  mines  in  Illinois  have  been  closed,  the  average  out- 
put per  mine  in  Illinois  has  increased  markedly,  far  more  dramatically  than  the 
average  for  the  United  States  as  a  whole.   (Source:  U.S.  Bureau  of  Mines  Miner- 
als Yearbooks. ) 


-  IT  - 


0 

50  to  99 
I  I  to  49 


Number  of  Employees 
More  than  1000 
500  to  999 
100  to  499 


20   40 


Miles 


Fig.  7  -  Pattern  of  employment  in  the  Illinois  coal  industry,  by  counties,  1972. 
(Source:   Illinois  Department  of  Mines  and  Minerals  1972  Coal  Report.) 


-  18  - 

TABLE  5— PROJECTED  DEMAND  FOE  U.S.  COAL  BY  POWER-CONSUMING  SECTORS* 

(millions  of  tons) 


Coal    supply 

1971+ 

1975 

1980 

1985 

2000 

Household  and  commercial 

14.6 

12 

11 

4 

— 

Industrial 

164.6 

I69 

175 

190 

247 

Electrical  generation 

331.6 

384 

460 

613 

755 

Synthetic   gas 

— 

— 

19 

86 

308 

Export 

Total 

58.0 
568.8 

636 

_I5_ 
740 

_8J 
980 

108 
1,418 

*  Source:   Dupree  and  West,  1972. 
t  Actual  figures. 

tons  of  coal  in  1985  and  almost  1^  "billion  tons  in  2000.   U.S.  production  in 
1971  was  only  569  million  tons;  in  1972  it  was  595  million  tons. 

In  1972  more  than  32  million  tons  of  coal,  25  million  from  Illinois, 
were  consumed  in  Illinois  for  the  generation  of  electrical  energy  (tables  6 
and  7)»  almost  77  percent  of  all  coal  used  in  the  state.   The  amount  is  pro- 
jected to  increase  substantially  as  the  demand  for  electrical  energy  continues 
to  soar  (Risser,  1970).   Much  of  the  increased  demand  for  electricity  will  be 
met  by  electricity  generated  by  nuclear  energy,  but,  even  if  the  development 
of  nuclear  capacity  progresses  as  hoped,  a  substantial  increase  in  coal  con- 
sumption will  still  be  needed. 

At  present,  two  principal  sources  supply  steam  coal  for  Illinois 
power  plants,  the  Illinois  Basin  mines  (including  those  of  Indiana  and  western 
Kentucky)  and  the  western  subbituminous  mining  area  in  Wyoming  and  Montana, 
from  which  about  six  million  tons  are  reportedly  coming  into  the  Chicago  area 
annually.   The  western  coal  is  low-sulfur  coal,  and,  although  of  lower  heating 
value  than  midwestern  or  eastern  coals,  is  becoming  increasingly  important  in 
the  central  part  of  the  United  States.   Several  new  power  plants  will  be  using 
this  coal  in  Texas,  Oklahoma,  Kansas,  and  other  states. 

A  large  percentage  of  low-sulfur  coal  produced  in  Illinois  is  used 
by  steel  companies  for  blending  with  higher  rank  coals  to  produce  metallurgi- 
cal coke.   The  coal  with  the  lowest  sulfur  content  produced  from  the  relatively 
low-sulfur  coal  mines  is  generally  committed  to  this  market. 


SOME  COAL-RELATED  PROBLEMS 


Sulfur  Emission 

Illinois  faces  several  problems  related  to  its  most  abundant  energy 
resource  (Risser,  1973a,b).  One  immediate  problem  is  that  present  and  proposed 


-  19  - 

state  and  Federal  regulations  on  emissions  of  sulfur  dioxide  prohibit  the  use 
of  most  Illinois  coal  unless  most  of  the  sulfur  it  contains  is  removed. 

Although  the  Illinois  Geological  Survey  has  done  extensive  research 
to  determine  the  possibility  of  reducing  the  sulfur  content  of  coal  and  has 
achieved  substantial  reductions  in  total  sulfur,  no  methods  have  been  devised 
to  lower  the  sulfur  to  the  level  that  proposed  regulations  require  (Helfinstine 
et  al. ,  1971  and  in  press;   Deurbrouck,  1972).   Pyritic  sulfur,  which  makes  up 
about  60  percent  of  the  total  sulfur  in  our  coals,  is  the  most  amenable  to  re- 
duction by  conventional  gravity  techniques  of  coal  cleaning,  but,  even  when  the 
coal  is  reduced  to  relatively  fine  sizes  (minus  three-eighths  of  an  inch) ,  gen- 
erally only  about  half  of  the  pyritic  sulfur  is  removable  (about  one-third  or 
less  of  the  total  sulfur  in  the  coal).   There  is  some  variation  in  the  "clean- 
ability"  of  Illinois  coals,  but,  since  a  significant  portion  of  total  sulfur  is 
organic,  only  a  very  small  portion  of  Illinois  coal  can  be  cleaned  to  0.7  per- 
cent total  sulfur — the  approximate  level  that  regulations  will  require. 

Extensive  research  has  been  conducted  throughout  the  country  on  methods 
of  removing  sulfur  dioxide  and  cleaning  stack  gases  from  large  units,  such  as 
those  found  in  power  plants.   Some  processes  are  currently  undergoing  full-scale 
plant  tests  in  Illinois,  as  well  as  in  a  number  of  other  states. 


TABLE  6— ILLINOIS  CONSUMPTION  OF  BITUMINOUS  COAL  FROM  ALL 
PRODUCING  DISTRICTS,  INCLUDING  ILLINOIS,  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES* 

(net  tons) 


Commercial 

Electric 

Coke 

and 

Industrial 

Year 

utilities 

plants 

domestic 

and  misc. 

Total 

I960 

19.13^,000 

2,948,000 

6,570,000 

10,053,000 

38,705,000 

1961 

19,182,000 

2 , 774 , 000 

5,696,000 

9,827,000 

37,479,000 

1962 

20,380,000 

2,874,000 

5,803,000 

10,202,000 

39,259.000 

1963 

20,924,000 

2,798,000 

5,288,000 

10,076,000 

39,086,000 

1964 

22,995,000 

3,309,000 

4,809,000 

10,353,000 

41,466,000 

1965 

25,180,000 

3,608,000 

4,558,000 

11,010,000 

44,356,000 

1966 

27,808,000 

3,626,000 

4,263,000 

10,685,000 

46,382,000 

1967 

29,497,000 

3,449,000 

4 , 074 , 000 

9,690,000 

46,710,000 

1968 

28,221,000 

3,069,000 

3,312,000 

8,863,000 

43,465,000 

1969 

30,393,000 

3,713,000 

3,077,000 

8,061,000 

45,244,000 

1970 

29,453,000 

3,688,000 

2,591,000 

6,579,000 

42,311,000 

1971 

27,930,000 

3,347,000 

1,871,000 

5,141,000 

38,289,000 

1972 

32,294,000 

3,243,000 

1,415,000 

5,076,000 

42,028,000 

*  Source:  U.S.  Bureau  of  Mines  Mineral  Industry  Surveys,  Annual  and  Quarterly 
Distribution  Reports. 


-  20  - 


TABLE  T— ILLINOIS  CONSUMPTION  OF  BITUMINOUS  COAL  FROM  ILLINOIS  MINES* 

(net  tons) 


Commercial 

Electric 

Coke 

and 

Industrial 

Year 

utilities 

plants 

domestic 

and  misc. 

Total 

i960 

14 ,  97^  ,  000 

499,000 

3,078,000 

8,289,000 

26,840,000 

1961 

16,439. 

ooot 

2,526,000 

8,082,000 

27,047,000 

1962 

16,720,000 

755 . 000 

2,558,000 

8,437,000 

28,470,000 

1963 

17,670,000 

801,000 

2,316,000 

8,513,000 

29,300,000 

1964 

19,706,000 

922,000 

2,203,000 

8,565,000 

31,396,000 

1965 

22,115,000 

1,170,000 

1,959,000 

8,903,000 

34,147,000 

1966 

25,058,000 

1,513,000 

1,889,000 

9,113,000 

37,573,000 

1967 

26,825,000 

1,468,000 

1,831,000 

8,386,000 

38,510,000 

1968 

25,539,000 

1,200,000 

1,362,000 

7,618,000 

35,719,000 

1969 

26,622,000 

1,538,000 

1,141,000 

7,102,000 

3  6,403,000 

1970 

25,688,000 

1,618,000 

1,015,000 

5,657,000 

33,978,000 

1971 

22,204,000 

1,424,000 

723,000 

4,189,000 

28,540,000 

1972 

25,329,000 

1,288,000 

630,000 

4,084,000 

31,331,000 

*  Source:   U.S.  Bureau  of  Mines  Mineral  Industry  Surveys,  Annual  and  Quarterly 

Distribution  Reports. 
t  Mineral  Industry  Distribution  Report  for  1961  combines  utilities  coal 

consumption  with  coke  and  gas  plant  consumption. 

The  National  Academy  of  Engineering/National  Research  Council,  stud- 
ied and  reported  on  the  abatement  of  sulfur  oxide  emissions  from  stationary- 
sources  in  1970.   The  report  stated  "...contrary  to  widely  held  belief,  com- 
mercially proven  technology  for  control  of  sulfur  oxides  from  combustion  pro- 
cesses does  not  exist   [on  a  scale  considered  for  demonstration  or  larger]." 
A  recent  report  prepared  for  the  Federal  Interagency  Committee  on  Evaluation 
of  State  Air  Implementation  Plans  by  the  Sulfur  Oxide  Control  Technology  As- 
sessment Panel  (S0CTAP,  1973)   indicated  that  technological  problems  in  con- 
trolling sulfur  dioxide  emission  would  be  solved  sometime  in  1974.   However, 
not  all  task  force  members  agreed  with  that  optimistic  projection. 

Despite  claims  made  by  some  manufacturers,  prior  to  and  since  the 
NAE/NRC  study,  that  their  equipment  could  effectively  remove  sulfur  dioxide, 
we  feel  the  conclusion  of  the  committee  is  still  true.   The  level  of  work  on 
this  problem  is  such,  however,  that  one  or  more  successful  processes  for  re- 
moving sulfur  dioxide  from  flue  gases  will  be  developed  soon.   One  process  in 
Japan  has  been  in  successful  operation  on  a  full-scale  plant  for  about  a  year. 
Various  technical  observers  have  reported  that  this  operation  does  not  meet 
U.S.  needs,  but  some  qualified  observers  have  indicated  the  process  could  be 
applied.   Close  analysis  of  the  scrubbing  agent  used,  the  nature  of  load,  oper- 
ation at  full  capacity,  disposal  of  wastes,  and  costs  will  determine  if  the 
process  can  be  used  in  the  United  States. 


-  21  - 

Whether  the  cost  of  any  of  the  promising  techniques  will  prevent 
their  acceptance  will  be  determined  after  technical  feasibility  has  been 
demonstrated.   It  is  unlikely  that  any  single  process  will  be  applicable  to 
all  installations,  and  time  will  be  required  to  design,  manufacture,  and  in- 
stall any  device  in  the  wide  variety  of  plants  to  which  it  may  be  applicable. 

Liquefaction  and  Gasification 

Another  major  area  of  research  in  the  past  10  years  has  been  the 
liquefaction  and  gasification  of  coal.   Extensive  efforts  on  pilot-plant 
scale  are  being  planned  and  conducted  to  produce  gas  of  pipeline  quality 
(about  1000  Btu  per  cubic  foot).  The  relatively  good  mining  conditions,  the 
extensive  reserves  of  relatively  thick  coals,  the  moderate  water  potential, 
the  availability  of  pipelines,  and  the  presence  of  underground  gas  storage 
facilities  suggest  that  Illinois  would  be  an  ideal  location  for  such  devel- 
opments. However,  such  gas,  which  is  essentially  sulfur  free,  will  probably 
not  be  available  much  before  1980.   Furthermore,  the  gas  probably  will  be  too 
expensive  for  electric  power  generation. 

Conversion  of  coal  to  low-Btu  gas  at  a  power  plant  for  on-site  use 
is  being  planned  in  the  United  States.  As  the  process  would  include  the  re- 
moval of  sulfur  from  the  gas,  its  successful  development  holds  much  promise 
for  installations  that  could  employ  this  technique,  providing  economics  prove 
favorable . 

Manpower 

Many  have  recognized  that  if  demands  for  coal  to  meet  utility  needs 
and  to  serve  as  a  raw  material  for  gas  and  liquid  fuels  increase  greatly,  the 
nation  will  find  it  difficult  to  obtain  and  train  the  highly  skilled  manpower 
required  for  modern  coal  mine  operations,  particularly  for  underground  mining. 
The  largest  part  of  our  Illinois  reserves,  as  noted  previously,  must  be  mined 
by  underground  methods. 

Because  of  the  potential  of  this  valuable  resource  for  meeting  future 
energy  requirements,  it  is  important  that  the  trained  manpower  force  we  now  have 
should  not  be  allowed  to  disperse.  The  present  trained  corps  of  miners  will  be 
an  essential  nucleus  for  the  much  larger  work  force  that  will  certainly  be  re- 
quired before  the  end  of  the  decade. 

New  Mines 

One  considerable  problem  related  to  obtaining  fuel  resources  to  meet 
our  energy  needs  is  the  time  factor  involved  in  the  planning,  exploration,  de- 
sign, and  construction  of  the  new  mines  that  will  be  needed.  There  appears  to 
be  a  reluctance  to  invest  in  the  opening  of  new  mines  in  areas  such  as  Illinois 
where  permission  to  use  high-sulfur  coal  may  not  be  forthcoming  in  the  near  fu- 
ture.   Lead  times  of  at  least  from  2  to  h   years  are  required  for  construction 
of  large  strip  mines ,  and  3  to  5  years  are  needed  for  construction  of  large  un- 
derground mines.   This  required  lead  time  and  the  present  hesitancy  to  begin  new 
mines  will  have  an  adverse  effect  on  potential  coal  production  in  the  next  sev- 
eral years. 


-  22  - 

Alternate  Strategies 

An  unpublished  report  of  the  Task  Force  for  Sulfur  Dioxide  Control 
Technology,  prepared  in  1971  for  the  Illinois  Institute  for  Environmental 
Quality,  suggested  strategies  for  improving  ambient  air  quality  in  the  imme- 
diate future,  in  case  sufficient  low-sulfur  fuels  are  not  available  and  until 
various  sulfur  dioxide  control  processes  have  been  perfected.  The  procedures 
include : 

1.  Stock  piling  of  available   low-sulfur  fuels  for  use  only 
when  meteorological  conditions  are  adverse,  and  use  of 
available  higher  sulfur  fuels  during  periods  when  weather 
conditions  permit  wide  dissemination  of  gases. 

2.  Shut-downs  or  reduced  operations  of  plants  for  which  low- 
sulfur  fuels  may  not  be  available,  even  on  emergency  basis, 
when  meteorological  conditions  are  adverse. 

3.  Use  of  tall  stacks,  which,  while  not  reducing  total  emis- 
sions, can  reduce  level  of  concentration  in  ambient  air. 

k.      Shift  of  power  generation  from  stations  where  meteoro- 
logical conditions  are  adverse  to  other  stations  that 
have  favorable  conditions. 

In  closing,  we  cannot  ignore  the  place  of  other  fuel  resources,  in- 
cluding oil,  natural  gas,  and  nuclear  energy.   It  is  our  firm  belief,  however, 
that  future  competition  among  fuels  will  be  relative  to  where   each  fuel  will 
be  used,  rather  than  what   fuel  will  be  displaced.   In  the  near-  and  long-term 
future,  we  shall  need  to  draw  on  all   of  our  available  fuel  resources.  While 
nuclear  energy  will  be  used  increasingly  for  generation  of  electricity,  we 
agree  with  others  that  there  will  also  be  a  greatly  increasing  demand  for  coal, 
at  least  to  the  end  of  the  century. 

We  have  vital  energy  resources  in  Illinois.   It  is  hoped  that  we  can 
use  them  wisely  and  well. 


-  23  - 

REFERENCES 

Cady,  G.  H.  ,  1935 »  Classification  and  selection  of  Illinois  coals:   Illinois  Geol.  Survey- 
Bull.  62,  354  P. 

Cady,  G.  H.,  et  al . ,  1952,  Minable  coal  reserves  of  Illinois:   Illinois  Geol.  Survey  Bull. 
78,  138  p. 

Clegg,  K.  E.,  196l,  Subsurface  geology  and  coal  resources  of  the  Pennsylvanian  System — 
Sangamon,  Macon,  Menard,  and  parts  of  Christian  and  Logan  Counties,  Illinois: 
Illinois  Geol.  Survey  Circ.  312,  28  p. 

Clegg,  K.  E.,  1972,  Subsurface  geology  and  coal  resources  of  the  Pennsylvanian  System  in 
De  Witt,  McLean,  and  Piatt  Counties,  Illinois:   Illinois  Geol.  Survey  Circ.  473, 
25  P. 

Damberger,  H.  H. ,  1971j  Coalif ication  pattern  of  the  Illinois  Basin:   Econ.  Geology,  v.  66, 
no.  3,  p.  488-4911. 

Deurbrouck,  A.  W.,  1972,  Sulfur  reduction  potential  of  the  coals  of  the  United  States: 
U.S.  Bur.  Mines  Rept.  Inv.  7633,  289  p. 

Dupree,  W.  G.,  Jr.,  and  J.  A.  West,  1972,  United  States  energy  through  2000:   U.S.  Dept. 
Interior,  80  p. 

Gluskoter,  H.  J.,  and  J.  A.  Simon,  1968,  Sulfur  in  Illinois  coals:   Illinois  Geol.  Survey 
Circ.  432,  28  p. 

Helfinstine,  R.  J.,  N.  P.  Shimp,  J.  A.  Simon,  and  M.  E.  Hopkins,  1971»  Sulfur  reduction 
of  Illinois  coals — washability  studies.   Part  1:   Illinois  Geol.  Survey  Circ.  462, 
44  p. 

Helfinstine,  R.  J.,  N.  F.  Shimp,  M.  E.  Hopkins,  and  J.  A.  Simon,  in  press,  Sulfur  reduc- 
tion of  Illinois  coals— washability  studies.  Part  2:   Illinois  Geol.  Survey  Circ. 

Hopkins,  M.  E.,  1968,  Harrisburg  (No.  5)  Coal  reserves  of  southeastern  Illinois:   Illinois 
Geol.  Survey  Circ.  431,  25  p. 

National  Academy  of  Engineering/National  Research  Council,  1970,  Abatement  of  sulfur 

oxide  emissions  from  stationary  combustion  sources:   NAE/NRC ,  Washington,  D.  C, 
75  P- 

National  Air  Pollution  Control  Administration,  1969.  Control  techniques  for  sulfur  oxide 
pollutants:   U.S.  Dept.  Health,  Education,  and  Welfare,  NAPCA  Publication  AP-52. 

Reinertsen,  D.  L.,  1964,  Strippable  coal  reserves  of  Illinois.   Part  4 — Adams,  Brown, 
Calhoun,  Hancock,  McDonough,  Pike,  Schuyler,  and  the  southern  parts  of  Henderson 
and  Warren  Counties:   Illinois  Geol.  Survey  Circ.  374,  32  p. 

Risser,  H.  E.,  i960,  Coal  in  the  future  energy  market:   Illinois  Geol.  Survey  Circ.  310, 
15  P. 

Risser,  H.  E.,  1970»  Power  and  the  environment — A  potential  crisis  in  energy  supply: 
Illinois  Geol.  Survey  Environmental  Geology  Note  40,  47  p. 


-  24  - 

Risser,  H.  E.,  1973,  Energy  supply  problems  for  the  1970s  and  beyond:   Illinois  Geol. 
Survey  Environmental  Geology  Note  62,  12  p. 

Risser,  H.  E.,  1973,  The  U.S.  energy  dilemma:   The  gap  between  today's  requirements  and 
tomorrow's  potential:   Illinois  Geol.  Survey  Environmental  Geology  Note  64,  64  p. 

Searight,  T.  K. ,  and  W.  H.  Smith,  19^9»  Strippable  coal  reserves  of  Illinois.  Part  5B — 
Mercer,  Rock  Island,  Warren,  and  parts  of  Henderson  and  Henry  Counties:   Illinois 
Geol.  Survey  Circ.  439,  22  p. 

Simon,  J.  A.,  1970.  Comments  on  fuel  resources  and  pollution  in  the  power  generation  in- 
dustry:  Unpubl.  information  testimony  for  Illinois  Commerce  Commission,  Docket 
No.  55321,  46  p. 

Smith,  W.  H. ,  1957,  Strippable  coal  reserves  of  Illinois.  Part  I — Gallatin,  Hardin, 

Johnson,  Pope,  Saline,  and  Williamson  Counties:   Illinois  Geol.  Survey  Circ.  228, 

39  P. 

Smith,  W.  H. ,  1958,  Strippable  coal  reserves  of  Illinois.  Part  2 — Jackson,  Monroe, 

Perry,  Randolph,  and  St.  Clair  Counties:   Illinois  Geol.  Survey  Circ.  260,  35  p. 

Smith,  W.  H. ,  1961,  Strippable  coal  reserves  of  Illinois.  Part  3— Madison,  Macoupin, 

Jersey,  Greene,  Scott,  Morgan,  and  Cass  Counties:   Illinois  Geol.  Survey  Circ.  311, 

40  p. 

Smith,  W.  H. ,  1968,  Strippable  coal  reserves  of  Illinois.   Part  6 — La  Salle,  Livingston, 
Grundy,  Kankakee,  Will,  Putnam,  and  parts  of  Bureau  and  Marshall  Counties:   Illi- 
nois Geol.  Survey  Circ.  419,  29  p. 

Smith,  W.  H. ,  and  D.  J.  Berggren,  1963,  Strippable  coal  reserves  of  Illinois.  Part  5A — 
Fulton,  Henry,  Knox,  Peoria,  Stark,  Tazewell,  and  parts  of  Bureau,  Marshall,  Mer- 
cer, and  Warren  Counties:   Illinois  Geol.  Survey  Circ.  348,  59  P» 

Sulfur  Oxide  Control  Technology  Assessment  Panel  (SOCTAP),  1973,  Final  report  on  projected 
utilization  of  stack-gas  cleaning  systems  by  steam-electric  plants:  Washington, 
D.  C,  April  15,  93  p. 

Task  Force  for  Sulfur  Dioxide  Control  Technology,  1971,  Report  on  abatement  strategies 
for  sulfur  dioxide  emissions  from  stationary  sources:  Unpubl.  rept.  to  Illinois 
Inst,  for  Environmental  Quality,  submitted  September  1971,  86  p. 


SELECTED  LIST  OF  SURVEY  PUBLICATIONS 

MINERAL  ECONOMICS  BRIEFS  SERIES 

5.  Summary  of  Illinois  Mineral  Production  in  1961.   1962. 

11.  Shipments  of  Illinois  Crushed  Stone,  1954-1964.   1966. 

12.  Mineral  Resources  and  Mineral  Industries  of  the  East  St.  Louis  Region,  Illinois.   1966. 

13.  Mineral  Resources  and  Mineral  Industries  of  the  Extreme  Southern  Illinois  Region.   1966. 
17.  Mineral  Resources  and  Mineral  Industries  of  the  Springfield  Region,  Illinois.   1967. 

19.  Mineral  Resources  and  Mineral  Industries  of  the  Western  Illinois  Region.   1967. 

20.  Mineral  Resources  and  Mineral  Industries  of  the  Northwestern  Illinois  Region.   1967. 

21.  Illinois  Mineral  Production  by  Counties,  1966.   1968. 

22.  Mineral  Resources  and  Mineral  Industries  of  the  Northeastern  Illinois  Region.   1968. 

26.  Evaluation  of  Fuels — Long-Term  Factors  and  Considerations.   19&9- 

27.  Illinois  Mineral  Production  by  Counties,  1968.   1970. 
29.  Directory  of  Illinois  Mineral  Producers.   1971 . 

INDUSTRIAL  MINERALS  NOTES  SERIES 

13.  Summary  of  Illinois  Mineral  Industry,  1951-1959.   1961. 

17.  Pelletizing  Illinois  Fluorspar.   1963. 

19.  Binding  Materials  Used  in  Making  Pellets  and  Briquets.   1964. 

20.  Chemical  Composition  of  Some  Deep  Limestones  and  Dolomites  in  Livingston  County,  Illinois.  1$ 

21.  Illinois  Natural  Resources — An  Industrial  Development  Asset.   1964. 

23.  Limestone  Resources  of  Jefferson  and  Marion  Counties,  Illinois.   1965. 

24.  Thermal  Expansion  of  Certain  Illinois  Limestones.   1966. 

26.  Binders  for  Fluorspar  Pellets.   1966. 

27.  High-Purity  Limestones  in  Illinois.   1966. 

29.  Clay  and  Shale  Resources  of  Clark,  Crawford,  Cumberland,  Edgar,  Effingham,  Jasper, 

and  Vermilion  Counties.   1967* 

30.  Lightweight  Bricks  Made  with  Clay  and  Expanded  Plastic.   1967. 

31.  Clays  as  Binding  Materials.   1967. 

32.  Silica  Sand  Briquets  and  Pellets  as  a  Replacement  for  Quartzite.   1968. 

34.  Neutron  Activation  Analysis  at  the  Illinois  State  Geological  Survey.   1968. 

35.  Computer-Calculated  Lambert  Conformal  Conic  Projection  Tables  for  Illinois  (7-5-Minute 

Intersections).   1968. 

36.  Beneficiation  of  Kaolinite  Clay  from  Silica  Sand  Washings.   1968. 

37.  Peat  and  Humus  in  Illinois.   1969. 

38.  Kankakee  Dune  Sands  as  a  Commercial  Source  of  Feldspar.   1969* 

39-  Alumina  Content  of  Carbonate  Rocks  as  an  Index  to  Sodium  Sulfate  Soundness.   1969» 
10.  Colloidal-Size  Silica  Produced  from  Southern  Illinois  Tripoli.   1970. 

41.  Two-Dimensional  Shape  of  Sand  Made  by  Crushing  Illinois  Limestones  of  Different  Textures. 

1970. 

42.  An  Investigation  of  Sands  on  the  Uplands  Adjacent  to  the  Sangamon  River  Floodplain: 

Possibilities  as  a  "Blend  Sand"  Resource.   1970. 

43.  Lower  Mississippi  River  Terrace  Sands  as  a  Commercial  Source  of  Feldspar.   1970* 

44.  Analyses  of  Some  Illinois  Rocks  for  Gold.   1970. 

45.  Clay  and  Shale  Resources  of  Madison,  Monroe,  and  St.  Clair  Counties,  Illinois.   1971» 

46.  Sideritic  Concretions  in  Illinois  Shale,  Gravel,  and  Till.   1972. 

47.  Selected  and  Annotated  List  of  Industrial  Minerals  Publications  of  the  Illinois  State 

Geological  Survey.   1972. 

ILLINOIS  MINERALS  NOTES  SERIES 
(The  Illinois  Minerals  Notes  Series  continues  the  Industrial  Minerals  Notes 
Series  and  incorporates  the  Mineral  Economics  Briefs  Series) 

48.  Illinois  Mineral  Production  by  Counties,  1970.   1972. 

49.  Clay  and  Shale  Resources  of  Peoria  and  Tazewell  Counties,  Illinois.   1973. 

50.  By-Product  Gypsum  in  Illinois — A  New  Resource?   1973. 

51.  Illinois  Mineral  Production  by  Counties,  1971.   1973. 

52.  Fuels  and  Energy  Situation  in  the  Midwest  Industrial  Market.   1973.